Dataset Viewer
instruction
stringlengths 14
71
| response
stringlengths 53
3.78k
|
|---|---|
How is Planning used in the Straumann® system? | <html><body><table><tr><td>3.1 Implant position 12</td></tr><tr><td></td></tr><tr><td>3.2 Planning aids 19</td></tr><tr><td></td></tr></table></body></html> |
Why is Thoma important in implant procedures? | 1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30) 2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11 3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212 4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737 5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21 6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434 7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551 8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486 9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272 10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). "Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans." Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356. 11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). "Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760. 12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). "10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface." Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124. 13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). "Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial." Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961. 14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). "Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744. 15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115. 16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450 17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86 |
What are the key considerations for Ti Alloy? | 1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30) 2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11 3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212 4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737 5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21 6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434 7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551 8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486 9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272 10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). "Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans." Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356. 11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). "Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760. 12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). "10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface." Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124. 13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). "Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial." Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961. 14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). "Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744. 15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115. 16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450 17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86 |
Can you explain Determining? | Determining each magnification factor or scale is facilitated by showing the X-ray Reference Sphere on the template (next to the scale reference). |
How is Depth used in the Straumann® system? |  Depth stops for osteotomes |
When do we use Morse? | The CrossFit® connection of Straumann® Bone Level Implants applies the know-how and benefits from the Straumann® synOcta® Morse taper connection to the connection requirements at bone level. Similar to the Straumann® synOcta® connection, the mechanically locking friction fit of the $15^{\circ}$ conical-cylindrical CrossFit® connection with four internal grooves has excellent long-term stability under all loading conditions and virtually eliminates screw loosening. The CrossFit® connection is available for Straumann® Bone Level Implants only. |
What is Ratchet? | Use the pivot of the Holding Key to stabilize the Ratchet during implant insertion or during tapping. |
Why is Indications important in implant procedures? | ѹ The Straumann® Dental Implant System ѹ Indications and Contraindications ѹ Preoperative Planning ѹ Surgical Procedures ѹ Healing Phase ѹ Additional Information on Instruments ѹ Appendix |
Why is Rinse important in implant procedures? | ѹ Never allow instruments to land on their tips. ѹ Use each instrument only for its intended purpose. ѹ Never let surgical residues (blood, secretion, tissue residues) dry on an instrument; clean immediately after surgery. ѹ Thoroughly clean off incrustations with soft brushes only. Disassemble instruments, clean cavities especially well. ѹ Never disinfect, clean (also ultrasound) or sterilize instruments made of different materials together. ѹ Use only cleaning agents and disinfectants intended for the material and follow the instructions for use of the manufacturer. ѹ Rinse disinfectants and cleaning agents very thoroughly with water. ѹ Never leave or store instruments moist or wet. |
What are the key considerations for Gapwidth? | <html><body><table><tr><td>Shoulder diameter D (mm)</td><td>Gapwidth amin (mm)</td><td>Distance between adjacent teeth atbone level bmin (mm)</td></tr><tr><td>3.5 (NNC)</td><td>5.5</td><td>6.5</td></tr><tr><td>4.8 (RN)</td><td>7</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>6.5 (WN)</td><td>8.5</td><td>9.5</td></tr><tr><td>Rule</td><td>D + 2 mm</td><td>D+3mm*</td></tr></table></body></html> |
What is Tappingwith Handpiece? | <html><body><table><tr><td>Tappingwith Handpiece</td><td>Tappingwith Ratchet</td></tr><tr><td>Connect the Tap for Adapter to the Handpiece via the Handpiece Adapter. Do not exceed 15 rpm.</td><td>For tapping with the Ratchet connect a Ratchet Adapter to the Tap for Adapter.After inserting the Tap into the ca- vity, the Ratchet is placed on its coupling and the thread is tapped with a slow rotating movement.The Holding Key is used as a stabilizer to maintain the direction of tapping during the procedure.</td></tr><tr><td>Handpiece Handpiece Adapter Tap for Adapter</td><td>Holding Key Holding Key Ratchet Adapter Tap for Adapter</td></tr></table></body></html> |
What are the key considerations for Healing Abutments? | A versatile portfolio of Healing Caps and Healing Abutments is available for all Straumann® implants, enabling soft-tissue sculpturing during transmucosal healing. They are recommended for intermediate use. After the soft-tissue healing phase they are replaced with the appropriate temporary or final restoration. |
What is Shape? | Shape the coronal part of the implant bed with the Standard Plus Profile Drill. |
What is While? | While approaching the final implant position, make sure that the drilled holes on the blue transfer part are oriented exactly orofacially. This positions the four protrusions of the internal connection for ideal prosthetic abutment orientation. A quarter turn to the next drilled hole corresponds to a vertical displacement of $0.2{\mathsf{m m}}$ . The drilled holes also show the depth of the implant shoulder in the bone. |
What are the key considerations for Medvedev? | 1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30) 2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11 3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212 4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737 5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21 6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434 7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551 8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486 9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272 10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). "Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans." Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356. 11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). "Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760. 12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). "10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface." Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124. 13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). "Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial." Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961. 14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). "Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744. 15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115. 16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450 17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86 |
Why is Chapter important in implant procedures? | After implantation, the implant is closed – hand-tightened – with an SCS Closure Screw, Healing Cap or Healing Abutment to protect the implant (for SCS Screwdrivers see Chapter 6.1.8). The surgeon can choose between submucosal and transmucosal healing and has many options available for soft tissue management through a set of secondary healing components. |
What are the key considerations for Depth Stop? | <html><body><table><tr><td colspan="4">Straumann@BLX implants</td><td colspan="7"> Surgical protocol</td><td colspan="4">FDI notation (World Dental Federation)</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td> Straumann? VeloDrillTM Guided Surgery</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Position</td><td>Milling Cutter</td><td>02.2 X VeloDrillTM</td><td>Bone density</td><td>02.8 X VeloDrillTM</td><td>03.2X VeloDrillTM</td><td>03.5 X VeloDrillTM</td><td>03.7 X VeloDrillTM</td><td>04.2 X VeloDrillTM</td><td>04.7 X VeloDrillTM</td><td></td><td>05.2X VeloDrillITM</td><td>06.2X VeloDrillIM</td><td>Implant</td><td> Depth Stop</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">32</td><td rowspan="3">03.5</td><td rowspan="3">三</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td rowspan="3">H6</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>。=</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>12mm</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>hard/D1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>SLActive</td></tr></table></body></html> |
What is the purpose of Implant Line? | ѹ Prosthetic Procedures for the Narrow Neck CrossFit® Implant – Straumann $\textcircled{1}$ Narrow Neck CrossFit® Implant Line (702058/en) ѹ Straumann® synOcta® Prosthetic System, Basic Information (702163/en) ѹ Cement-retained Crowns and Bridges with the Solid Abutment System: Straumann® Solid Abutment Prosthetic System (152.254/en) ѹ Straumann® Bone Level Prosthetic Procedures, Basic Information (702061/en) |
What are the key considerations for Careful? | Careful treatment of all instruments is of the utmost importance. Even slight damage, for instance to the drill tips (e.g., when the drills are “thrown” into a metal bowl) impairs cutting performance and thus the clinical result. With correct and careful care, the high quality of the material and excellent workmanship ensure that the cutting instruments (drills, taps etc.) can be used repeatedly (up to a maximum of ten times is recommended). The Surgery Tracking Sheet for Straumann Cutting Instruments (152.755/en). helps to give an overview of how often the individual instruments have already been used. |
Why is Overview important in implant procedures? | 1.1 Overview 3 1.2 Implant lines 4 1.3 Implant-abutment connections 6 1.4 Material 8 1.5 Surface 8 1.6 Transfer piece 8 |
How is Switzerland Phone used in the Straumann® system? | International Headquarters Institut Straumann AG Peter Merian-Weg 12 CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland Phone $+41$ (0)61 965 11 11 Fax $+41$ (0)61 965 11 01 www.straumann.com |
What is the purpose of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed? | 1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30) 2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11 3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212 4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737 5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21 6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434 7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551 8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486 9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272 10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). "Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans." Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356. 11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). "Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760. 12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). "10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface." Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124. 13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). "Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial." Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961. 14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). "Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744. 15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115. 16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450 17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86 |
How is Buser used in the Straumann® system? | 1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30) 2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11 3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212 4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737 5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21 6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434 7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551 8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486 9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272 10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). "Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans." Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356. 11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). "Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760. 12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). "10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface." Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124. 13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). "Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial." Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961. 14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). "Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744. 15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115. 16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450 17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86 |
When do we use Module Guided Surgery? | The C Module Guided Surgery stores guided handles and instrumentation for template fixation pins. All tools are stored horizontally on the holder. |
What is the purpose of Quintessence Int? | 1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30) 2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11 3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212 4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737 5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21 6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434 7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551 8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486 9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272 10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). "Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans." Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356. 11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). "Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760. 12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). "10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface." Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124. 13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). "Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial." Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961. 14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). "Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744. 15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115. 16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450 17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86 |
How is Guided Surgery Cassette used in the Straumann® system? | The conventional, non-modular Straumann® Guided Surgery Cassette (Art. No. 034.001) and the Straumann® Basic Guided Surgery Cassette (Art no. 034.281) don't provide the adequate storage space and workflow for the new Straumann® Guided Surgery components, like the Guided Adapters FIBA, the FIBA compatible Profile Drills and Taps and the new short Drill Handles. |
How is Widen used in the Straumann® system? | Step 7 – Widen the implant bed to $\theta4.2\mathsf{m m}$ Continue with the $\varnothing4.2{\mathrm{mm}}$ Straumann® Twist Drill PRO and check the final preparation depth with the $\varnothing4.2{\mathrm{mm}}$ Depth Gauge. |
Why is Guided Surgery Workflow important in implant procedures? | This guide provides an overview of the instruments required for the Straumann® Guided Surgery Workflow and describes the steps required for guided implant bed preparation and guided placement of implants of the Straumann® Dental Implant system. It is assumed that the user is familiar with placing dental implants. Not all detailed information will be found in this guide. Reference to existing Straumann® procedure manuals will be made throughout this document. |
Can you explain Never? | 1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30) 2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11 3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212 4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737 5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21 6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434 7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551 8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486 9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272 10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). "Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans." Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356. 11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). "Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760. 12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). "10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface." Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124. 13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). "Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial." Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961. 14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). "Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744. 15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115. 16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450 17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86 |
What are the key considerations for Current Treatment Modalities? | ѹ Volume 1: Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone – Single-Tooth Replacements ѹ Volume 2: Loading Protocols in Implant Dentistry – Partially Dentate Patients ѹ Volume 3: Implant Placement in Post-Extraction Sites – Treatment Options ѹ Volume 4: Loading Protocols in Implant Dentistry – Edentulous Patients ѹ Volume 5: Sinus Floor Elevation Procedures ѹ Volume 6: Extended Edentulous Spaces in the Esthetic Zone ѹ Volume 7: Ridge Augmentation Procedures in Implant Patients – A Staged Approach ѹ Volume 8: Biological and Hardware Complications in Implant Dentistry ѹ Volume 9: Implant Therapy in the Geriatric Patient ѹ Volume 10: Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone – Current Treatment Modalities and Materials for Single-tooth Replacements ѹ Volume 11: Digital Workflows in Implant Dentistry |
What is Access? | ѹ Mucosal thickness, ѹ Type of Surgical Template (mucosa, bone or tooth-supported) ѹ Access for instrument irrigation. |
Why is Prosthetic Instruments important in implant procedures? | ѹ Well maintained instruments are a basic requirement for successful treatment. You will find detailed information in the brochure Straumann® Surgical and Prosthetic Instruments, Care and Maintenance (702000/en). |
When do we use Template Fixation Pin? | To insert the pins, a T-sleeve for Template Fixation Pin (art. no. 034.283) and Drill for Template Fixation Pin (art. no. 034.284) are used. |
What is the purpose of All Closure Screws? | Note: All Closure Screws are delivered sterile and ready to use. |
What is the purpose of Recommendations? | Recommendations for correct torque with the Straumann® Dental Implant System |
Can you explain Chappuis? | 1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30) 2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11 3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212 4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737 5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21 6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434 7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551 8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486 9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272 10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). "Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans." Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356. 11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). "Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760. 12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). "10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface." Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124. 13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). "Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial." Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961. 14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). "Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744. 15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115. 16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450 17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86 |
Why is Handles important in implant procedures? | ѹ Straumann® Dental Implant System, Basic Information (702084/en) ѹ Straumann® Bone Level Tapered Implant, Basic Information (702167/en) ѹ Straumann® BLX Implant System, Basic Information (702115/en) ѹ Straumann® TLX Implant System, Basic Information (702854/en) ѹ Straumann® Modular Cassette, Basic Information (702527/en) ѹ Straumann® Modular Cassette, Selection Guide (702824/en) ѹ Straumann® Surgical and Prosthetic Instruments, Care and maintenance (702000/en) ѹ Guidance for Implant Removal, Basic Information (702085/en) ѹ Straumann® Guided Surgery (702083/en) - Guided Surgery System with C-Handles |
What are the key considerations for Basic Guided Surgery Cassette? | The conventional, non-modular Straumann® Guided Surgery Cassette (Art. No. 034.001) and the Straumann® Basic Guided Surgery Cassette (Art no. 034.281) don't provide the adequate storage space and workflow for the new Straumann® Guided Surgery components, like the Guided Adapters FIBA, the FIBA compatible Profile Drills and Taps and the new short Drill Handles. |
What are the key considerations for Tapping? | Step 2 – Tapping the thread in dense bone Tap the implant bed with the S/SP Tap according to the endosteal diameter, in case of too high insertion torques. |
When do we use Mucosal? | ѹ Mucosal thickness, ѹ Type of Surgical Template (mucosa, bone or tooth-supported) ѹ Access for instrument irrigation. |
How is Extraction used in the Straumann® system? | ѹ Extraction sites, where the bone cavity is often wider than the diameter necessary to hold the Drill Stop. ѹ Use with drill templates, due to the interference with the template. |
When do we use Surgical? | ѹ Well maintained instruments are a basic requirement for successful treatment. You will find detailed information in the brochure Straumann® Surgical and Prosthetic Instruments, Care and Maintenance (702000/en). |
How is The Bone Level Tapered Implants used in the Straumann® system? | The Bone Level Tapered Implants are delivered with the Loxim® Transfer Piece, which is connected to the implant with a snap-in mounting. |
What is the purpose of Combined? | ѹ Manual thread tapping ѹ Manual placement of implants into their final position in the implant bed ѹ Manual screwing of healing caps and closure screws\*. ѹ Screwing of abutments and occlusal screws\*. \*Combined with the torque control device for defined torque |
How is Screwdrivers used in the Straumann® system? | After implantation, the implant is closed – hand-tightened – with an SCS Closure Screw, Healing Cap or Healing Abutment to protect the implant (for SCS Screwdrivers see Chapter 6.1.8). The surgeon can choose between submucosal and transmucosal healing and has many options available for soft tissue management through a set of secondary healing components. |
What is Partially Dentate Patients? | ѹ Volume 1: Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone – Single-Tooth Replacements ѹ Volume 2: Loading Protocols in Implant Dentistry – Partially Dentate Patients ѹ Volume 3: Implant Placement in Post-Extraction Sites – Treatment Options ѹ Volume 4: Loading Protocols in Implant Dentistry – Edentulous Patients ѹ Volume 5: Sinus Floor Elevation Procedures ѹ Volume 6: Extended Edentulous Spaces in the Esthetic Zone ѹ Volume 7: Ridge Augmentation Procedures in Implant Patients – A Staged Approach ѹ Volume 8: Biological and Hardware Complications in Implant Dentistry ѹ Volume 9: Implant Therapy in the Geriatric Patient ѹ Volume 10: Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone – Current Treatment Modalities and Materials for Single-tooth Replacements ѹ Volume 11: Digital Workflows in Implant Dentistry |
Can you explain Templates? | The $\mathsf{X}$ -ray Templates are used for measurement and comparison. They also assist the user in selecting the suitable implant type, diameter and length. The following X-ray Templates are available: |
How is The Narrow Neck used in the Straumann® system? | The Narrow Neck CrossFit $\textcircled{1}$ (NNC) Implant is a $3.3{\mathsf{m m}}$ diameter implant with a narrow prosthetic platform. The NNC Implant is a Standard Plus (SP) Tissue Level Implant with a machined neck of $1.8\mathsf{m m}$ in height. The implant body and thread design is the same as the Straumann ${\textsuperscript{\textregistered}}3.3\mathsf{m m}$ Bone Level NC Implant. |
How is First used in the Straumann® system? | ѹ The bone is prepared using the twist drills $(\emptyset2.2{\bmod{2}}.8{\mathsf{m m}}/3.5{\mathsf{m m}}/4.2{\mathsf{m m}})$ in accordance with the desired implant diameter. The surgeon feels his or her way very carefully down to the cortical bone of the sinus floor (minimum distance $\mathsf{1m m},$ . This process requires precise radiological planning. ѹ Before the instruments are used, it is advisable to mount the depth stops in order not to exceed the pre-determined working depth. These are mounted onto the instrument using an SCS screwdriver. ѹ First, the sinus floor is fractured, which requires precise radiological planning. The use of depth stops is also recommended in order not to exceed the pre-determined working depth. The instrument is introduced by lightly tapping with a hammer in accordance with the desired implant length. ѹ During elevation, autologous and/or alloplastic filling or bone material should also be applied to the implant bed. The material introduced acts like a cushion, lifting the mucous membrane in accordance with the principles of hydraulics. ѹ Insert the implant carefully without applying extra force. |
Why is Technical important in implant procedures? | For more information please refer to Chapter 3. Technical information on Straumann® guided instruments on page 16. |
Why is Windows important in implant procedures? | The Surgical Template must allow for proper irrigation of the surgical site. Windows may also be included in the Surgical Template. For a correct fit of the handle cylinder in the T-sleeve, remove additional material around the T-sleeve. |
What is Correct? | #### Step 4 – Correct implant orientation for Straumann® implants with CrossFit® connection |
What is Closure? | <html><body><table><tr><td>Connection</td><td>Recommended torque</td></tr><tr><td>Abutment (incl. angled abutments)</td><td>35 Ncm</td></tr><tr><td>Closure screws</td><td>15 Ncm</td></tr><tr><td>Healing caps</td><td>15 Ncm</td></tr><tr><td>Occlusal screws</td><td>15 Ncm</td></tr></table></body></html> |
What is the purpose of This Basic Information? | The Straumann® Dental Implant System offers a wide range of implant lines with diverse body and neck designs and different materials. This Basic Information focuses on the Titanium and Roxolid® Tissue Level and Bone Level implants with a parallel-walled endosteal design. These implants can be placed with the instruments from the Straumann® Surgical Cassette while using very similar surgical procedures. |
What are the key considerations for Bridges? | ѹ Prosthetic Procedures for the Narrow Neck CrossFit® Implant – Straumann $\textcircled{1}$ Narrow Neck CrossFit® Implant Line (702058/en) ѹ Straumann® synOcta® Prosthetic System, Basic Information (702163/en) ѹ Cement-retained Crowns and Bridges with the Solid Abutment System: Straumann® Solid Abutment Prosthetic System (152.254/en) ѹ Straumann® Bone Level Prosthetic Procedures, Basic Information (702061/en) |
When do we use Replacements? | ѹ Volume 1: Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone – Single-Tooth Replacements ѹ Volume 2: Loading Protocols in Implant Dentistry – Partially Dentate Patients ѹ Volume 3: Implant Placement in Post-Extraction Sites – Treatment Options ѹ Volume 4: Loading Protocols in Implant Dentistry – Edentulous Patients ѹ Volume 5: Sinus Floor Elevation Procedures ѹ Volume 6: Extended Edentulous Spaces in the Esthetic Zone ѹ Volume 7: Ridge Augmentation Procedures in Implant Patients – A Staged Approach ѹ Volume 8: Biological and Hardware Complications in Implant Dentistry ѹ Volume 9: Implant Therapy in the Geriatric Patient ѹ Volume 10: Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone – Current Treatment Modalities and Materials for Single-tooth Replacements ѹ Volume 11: Digital Workflows in Implant Dentistry |
Can you explain Narrow? | <html><body><table><tr><td colspan="2">List of abbreviations</td></tr><tr><td>SCS =</td><td>Screw Carrying System</td></tr><tr><td>HDD =</td><td>Horizontal Defect Dimension</td></tr><tr><td>NNC =</td><td>Narrow Neck CrossFit connection (3.5 mm)</td></tr><tr><td>RN =</td><td>Regular Neck (4.8 mm)</td></tr><tr><td>WN =</td><td>Wide Neck (6.5 mm)</td></tr><tr><td>NC</td><td>Narrow CrossFit? connection (for Bone Level lmplants)</td></tr><tr><td>RC</td><td>Regular CrossFit? connection (for Bone Level lmplants)</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>Standard</td></tr><tr><td>SP</td><td>Standard Plus</td></tr><tr><td>BL</td><td>Bone Level</td></tr><tr><td>SPS</td><td>Standard Plus Short</td></tr></table></body></html> |
How is Information used in the Straumann® system? | Information on the Straumann® Guided Implants and the Straumann® Guided Surgery System can be found in the brochure Straumann® Guided Surgery, Basic Information (702083/en). |
What is the purpose of The Profile Drill? | When inserting a Straumann® Standard Plus Implant up to the implant shoulder level (see Chapter 3), the preparation depth must be $2\mathsf{m m}$ deeper than the indicated implant length. (Example: The preparation depth for a $\boldsymbol{10}\boldsymbol{\mathrm{mm}}\mathsf{S P}$ Implant inserted up to shoulder level must be $12\mathsf{m m}$ .) The Profile Drill should also be used deeper for fine implant bed preparation. Examples are illustrated below |
When do we use Maestre? | 1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30) 2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11 3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212 4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737 5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21 6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434 7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551 8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486 9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272 10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). "Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans." Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356. 11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). "Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760. 12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). "10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface." Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124. 13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). "Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial." Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961. 14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). "Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744. 15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115. 16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450 17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86 |
Can you explain Endosteal? | <html><body><table><tr><td colspan="7">Instrumentation for basic implant bed preparation</td><td colspan="5">Endosteal (mm)</td></tr><tr><td>Step</td><td>Art. no.</td><td>Product</td><td> max.rpm</td><td></td><td></td><td>3.3</td><td></td><td>4.1</td><td></td><td>4.8</td></tr><tr><td>1 Ridge preparation</td><td>044.004</td><td>Round Bur, 3.1 mm</td><td>800</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">2 Mark implant</td><td>026.0054</td><td>Needle Drill, 1.6 mm</td><td rowspan="3">800</td><td>026.0054</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>044.022</td><td>Round Bur, 1.4 mm</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>044.003</td><td>Round Bur, 2.3 mm</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">3 Mark implant axis</td><td>044.004</td><td>Round Bur, 3.1 mm Pilot Twist Drill PRO,</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>044.785*</td><td>2.2 mm, long</td><td>800</td><td>044.785</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>046.704</td><td>Depth Gauge,with Implant Distance Indicator, 2.2/2.8 mm Pilot Twist Drill PRO,</td><td></td><td>1614121086</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">4 Prepare implant bed to 2.2 mm</td><td>044.785*</td><td>2.2 mm, long Alignment Pin, 2.2 mm,</td><td>800</td><td>044.785三中</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>046.799</td><td>straight Twist Drill PRO,</td><td></td><td>2181614121086</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">5 Prepare implant bed to 2.8 mm</td><td>044.789*</td><td>2.8 mm, long</td><td>600</td><td>上044.789三1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>046.800</td><td>Depth Gauge, 2.8 mm</td><td></td><td>21816141210816</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">6 Prepare implant bed to 3.5 mm</td><td>044.793*</td><td>Twist Dril R</td><td>500</td><td>044.793三三</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>046.802</td><td>Depth Gauge 3.5mm</td><td></td><td>18161121086</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">7 Prepare implant bed to 4.2mm</td><td>044.797*</td><td>Twist Drill PRO, 4.2 mm, long</td><td>400</td><td>E 04.797 </td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>046.804</td><td>Depth Gauge 4.2 mm</td><td></td><td>24181612108</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table></body></html> |
What is the purpose of Ratchet Adapter Hold? | Step 1 – Attach the Ratchet Adapter Hold the enclosed part of the implant carrier. Attach the Ratchet Adapter. A click will be heard when the Adapter is attached correctly. |
What is Closure Screw? | Spread the flap slightly and remove the Closure Screw with the SCS Screwdriver. |
Can you explain Mucosa? | <html><body><table><tr><td>Connection</td><td>Recommended torque</td></tr><tr><td>Basal screw</td><td>35 Ncm</td></tr><tr><td>Mucosa cylinder</td><td>35 Ncm</td></tr><tr><td>Bone graft abutment</td><td>15 Ncm</td></tr></table></body></html> |
What are the key considerations for Implants Standard? | <html><body><table><tr><td colspan="6"></td></tr><tr><td>Tissue Level Standard Implants</td><td></td><td>RN 4.8mm</td><td>RN 4.8mm</td><td>RN 4.8mm</td><td>WN* 6.5mm</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>√ 不 2.8 mm</td><td>3.3 mm</td><td>mD</td><td></td><td>不 2.6mm1 #</td></tr><tr><td>6 mm</td><td>S 3.3 RN</td><td></td><td>4.1mm S 4.1 RN</td><td>4.8 mm S Q 4.8 RN</td><td>4.8 mm S Q4.8 WN</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">8mm 10mm 12 mm</td><td rowspan="5"></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>H2/H4</td><td>H2/H4</td><td>H2/H4</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>H2</td><td>H2</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>TissueLevelStandard Plus</td><td>RN</td><td colspan="2">RN</td><td>RN</td><td>WN*</td></tr><tr><td>Implants √ 1.8 mm</td><td>NNC 3.5mm 上</td><td>4.8 mm D</td><td colspan="2">4.8mm D</td><td>4.8mm 1.6mm</td><td>6.5mm</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>3.3 mm SP 3.3 NNC</td><td>3.3mm SP 3.3 RN</td><td colspan="2">4.1 mm SP 4.1 RN</td><td>4.8 mm</td><td>4.8 mm</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">4mm 6 mm 8mm 10 mm</td><td></td><td colspan="2"></td><td>SP 4.8 RN H4/H6</td><td></td><td>SP 4.8 WN H4/H6</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="2"></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="2"></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="2"></td><td colspan="2"></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>H2/H4</td><td>H2/H4</td><td colspan="2">H2/H4</td><td>H2/H4</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td colspan="2"></td></tr><tr><td>TLX Implants Standard TLX Implants Standard Plus</td><td>NT 3.5mm</td><td>RT 4.8 mm</td><td>NT 3.5mm</td><td>RT 4.8 mm</td><td colspan="2">WT* 6.5mm</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>7</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>S/SP 3.5 NT</td><td>S/SP 3.75 RT</td><td>S/SP 4.5 NT</td><td>S/SP 4.5 RT</td><td>S/SP 5.5 WT</td><td>S/SP 6.5 WT</td></tr><tr><td>6 mm</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>8 mm 10 mm</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>12 mm</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>14mm</td><td>H2/H4</td><td>H2/H4</td><td>H2/H4</td><td>H2/H4</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>16 mm</td><td>H2</td><td>H2</td><td>H2</td><td>H2</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>18 mm</td><td></td><td>18 mm implants cannot be placed guided </td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table></body></html> |
Can you explain Maintenance? | ѹ Well maintained instruments are a basic requirement for successful treatment. You will find detailed information in the brochure Straumann® Surgical and Prosthetic Instruments, Care and Maintenance (702000/en). |
What is the purpose of Early? | 1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30) 2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11 3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212 4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737 5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21 6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434 7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551 8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486 9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272 10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). "Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans." Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356. 11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). "Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760. 12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). "10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface." Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124. 13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). "Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial." Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961. 14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). "Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744. 15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115. 16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450 17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86 |
Can you explain Further? | Continuing education ensures long-term success! Please ask your Straumann representative directly for information on the Straumann® Dental Implant System courses and training. Further information at www.straumann.com. |
Why is Ratchet Adapter important in implant procedures? | Step 1 – Attach the Ratchet Adapter Hold the enclosed part of the implant carrier. Attach the Ratchet Adapter. A click will be heard when the Adapter is attached correctly. |
Why is Modular Cassette important in implant procedures? | For more technical information, please see the brochure Straumann® Modular Cassette - Basic Information (702527/en). |
Can you explain Guided Adapter? | <html><body><table><tr><td>Art. No.</td><td> Picture</td><td>Article</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">BModule</td></tr><tr><td>041.776</td><td></td><td>Straumann? Modular Cassette, B Module</td></tr><tr><td>041.781</td><td>00 中 品品 ?</td><td>B Module, Guided Basic Tray</td></tr><tr><td>034.010</td><td>034.010 3</td><td>Mucosa Punch 3.4mm, 30 mm, guided</td></tr><tr><td>034.011</td><td>034.011</td><td>Mucosa Punch 4.0 mm,30 mm, guided</td></tr><tr><td>034.012</td><td>034.012 034.2150001</td><td>Mucosa Punch 4.7 mm, 30 mm, guided</td></tr><tr><td>034.215 034.415</td><td>034.41501</td><td>Milling Cutter, 2.8 mm, 32.5 mm, guided Milling Cutter, 3.5 mm, 32.5 mm, guided</td></tr><tr><td>034.615</td><td>03455</td><td>Milling Cutter, 4.2 mm, 32.5 mm, guided</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>034.257 034.258</td><td>034.257</td><td>BLT Drill, short, guided, length 33.4mm, 2.2mm</td></tr><tr><td>034.259</td><td>034.258</td><td> BLT Drill, medium, guided, length 37.4 mm, 2.2 mm</td></tr><tr><td>034.260</td><td>F034.259 034.260</td><td>BLT Drill long, guided, length 41.4mm,2.2 mm</td></tr><tr><td>034.261</td><td>034.261</td><td>BLT Drill, short, guided, length 33.4 mm, 2.8 mm</td></tr><tr><td>034.262</td><td>034.2621</td><td>BLT Drill, medium, guided, length 37.4 mm, 2.8 mm BLT Drill,long, guided, length 41.4 mm, 2.8 mm</td></tr><tr><td>034.263</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>034.263</td><td> BLT Drill, short, guided, length 33.4 mm, 3.5 mm</td></tr><tr><td>034.264</td><td>034.26412</td><td>BLT Drill, medium, guided, length 37.4 mm, 3.5 mm</td></tr><tr><td>034.265</td><td>034.265</td><td> BLT Drill, long, guided, length 41.4 mm, 3.5 mm</td></tr><tr><td>034.266</td><td>034.266 三</td><td> BLT Drill, short, guided, length 33.4 mm, 4.2 mm</td></tr><tr><td>034.267</td><td>034.267世</td><td> BLT Drill, medium, guided, length 37.4 mm, 4.2 mm</td></tr><tr><td>034.268</td><td>034.268</td><td>BLT Drill,long, guided, length 41.4 mm, 4.2 mm</td></tr><tr><td>034.354</td><td>034.354 034.355H</td><td>Guided Adapter for Profile Drill, FlBA, H2, handpiece, stainless steel</td></tr><tr><td>034.355</td><td>6</td><td>Guided Adapter for Profile Drill, FlBA, H4, handpiece, stainless steel</td></tr><tr><td>034.356</td><td>034.356 208</td><td>Guided Adapter for Profile Drill, FlBA, H6, handpiece, stainless steel</td></tr><tr><td>034.357</td><td>034.357 034.358</td><td>Guided Adapter for Tap, FlBA, H2, handpiece, stainless steel</td></tr><tr><td>034.358</td><td>034.35920864</td><td>Guided Adapter for Tap, FlBA, H4,handpiece, stainless steel</td></tr><tr><td>034.359</td><td></td><td>Guided Adapter for Tap, FlBA, H6,handpiece, stainless steel</td></tr><tr><td>034.324</td><td>BLT03.3</td><td>BLT Profile Drill short, FlBA compatible, 3.3 mm, L 27 mm, stainless steel</td></tr><tr><td>034.325</td><td>BLT04.1</td><td>BLT Profile Drill short, FIBA compatible,4.1 mm, L 27mm, stainless steel</td></tr><tr><td>034.326</td><td>BLT04.8 咖</td><td> BLT Profile Drill, short, FlBA compatible,4.8 mm, L27mm,stainless steel</td></tr></table></body></html> |
Why is Only Taps important in implant procedures? | Only Taps labeled to be FIBA compatible are to be used with the Guided Adapter for taps, FIBA. Always use the correct Guided Adapter according to the T-sleeve position (H2, H4, H6). Using the incorrect Guided Adapter or non-FIBA compatible may result in an incorrect drilling depth. |
Can you explain Cigarette? | 1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30) 2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11 3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212 4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737 5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21 6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434 7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551 8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486 9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272 10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). "Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans." Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356. 11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). "Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760. 12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). "10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface." Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124. 13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). "Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial." Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961. 14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). "Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744. 15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115. 16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450 17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86 |
What is the purpose of Healing Phase? | ѹ The Straumann® Dental Implant System ѹ Indications and Contraindications ѹ Preoperative Planning ѹ Surgical Procedures ѹ Healing Phase ѹ Additional Information on Instruments ѹ Appendix |
Why is Surgical Procedures important in implant procedures? | ѹ The Straumann® Dental Implant System ѹ Indications and Contraindications ѹ Preoperative Planning ѹ Surgical Procedures ѹ Healing Phase ѹ Additional Information on Instruments ѹ Appendix |
What is Bone Level Prosthetic Procedures? | ѹ Prosthetic Procedures for the Narrow Neck CrossFit® Implant – Straumann $\textcircled{1}$ Narrow Neck CrossFit® Implant Line (702058/en) ѹ Straumann® synOcta® Prosthetic System, Basic Information (702163/en) ѹ Cement-retained Crowns and Bridges with the Solid Abutment System: Straumann® Solid Abutment Prosthetic System (152.254/en) ѹ Straumann® Bone Level Prosthetic Procedures, Basic Information (702061/en) |
What is Disassemble? | ѹ Never allow instruments to land on their tips. ѹ Use each instrument only for its intended purpose. ѹ Never let surgical residues (blood, secretion, tissue residues) dry on an instrument; clean immediately after surgery. ѹ Thoroughly clean off incrustations with soft brushes only. Disassemble instruments, clean cavities especially well. ѹ Never disinfect, clean (also ultrasound) or sterilize instruments made of different materials together. ѹ Use only cleaning agents and disinfectants intended for the material and follow the instructions for use of the manufacturer. ѹ Rinse disinfectants and cleaning agents very thoroughly with water. ѹ Never leave or store instruments moist or wet. |
What are the key considerations for Bone Level? | 1. Pilot Twist Drill PRO, $\ensuremath{\mathcal{O}}2.2\ensuremath{\mathrm{mm}}$ 2. Alignment Pin, $\mathcal{O}2.2\mathsf{m m}$ 3. Twist Drill PRO, $\ensuremath{\mathcal{O}}2.8\ensuremath{\mathrm{mm}}$ 4. Twist Drill PRO, $\mathcal{O}3.5\mathsf{m m}$ 5. Twist Drill PRO, $\varnothing4.2{\mathsf{m m}}$ 6. Straumann® Standard Plus Implant, $\mathcal{\ K}4.1$ RN, length $\boldsymbol{10}\boldsymbol{\mathrm{mm}}$ 7. Straumann® Bone Level Implant, $\mathcal{O}4.1$ RC, length $\boldsymbol{10}\boldsymbol{\mathrm{mm}}$ |
When do we use Article Name? | <html><body><table><tr><td>Art. No.</td><td>Picture</td><td>Article Name</td><td>Max rpm.</td><td>Endosteal implant diameter (mm)</td></tr><tr><td>026.0144</td><td>二 026.01441111</td><td>Milling Cutter, 2.2 mm, guided</td><td>800</td><td>Q2.9</td></tr><tr><td>034.215</td><td>034.215</td><td>Milling Cutter,2.8 mm, guided</td><td>600</td><td>Q3.3 3.5</td></tr><tr><td>034.415</td><td>034.4151112</td><td>Milling Cutter, 3.5 mm, guided</td><td>500</td><td>3.75 4.0 Q4.1</td></tr><tr><td>034.615</td><td>034.61511111S</td><td>Milling Cutter, 4.2 mm, guided</td><td>400</td><td>84.5</td></tr></table></body></html> |
What is the purpose of Handpiece Adapter Hold? | Step 1 – Attach the Handpiece Adapter Hold the enclosed part of the implant carrier. Attach the Handpiece Adapter. A click will be heard when the Adapter is attached correctly. |
What is Prosthetic System? | ѹ Prosthetic Procedures for the Narrow Neck CrossFit® Implant – Straumann $\textcircled{1}$ Narrow Neck CrossFit® Implant Line (702058/en) ѹ Straumann® synOcta® Prosthetic System, Basic Information (702163/en) ѹ Cement-retained Crowns and Bridges with the Solid Abutment System: Straumann® Solid Abutment Prosthetic System (152.254/en) ѹ Straumann® Bone Level Prosthetic Procedures, Basic Information (702061/en) |
How is Related used in the Straumann® system? | 7.1 Related documentation 55 7.2 Important guidelines 56 |
When do we use Clinical Analysis When Using? | 1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30) 2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11 3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212 4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737 5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21 6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434 7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551 8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486 9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272 10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). "Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans." Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356. 11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). "Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760. 12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). "10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface." Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124. 13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). "Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial." Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961. 14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). "Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744. 15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115. 16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450 17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86 |
Why is Loading Protocols important in implant procedures? | ѹ Volume 1: Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone – Single-Tooth Replacements ѹ Volume 2: Loading Protocols in Implant Dentistry – Partially Dentate Patients ѹ Volume 3: Implant Placement in Post-Extraction Sites – Treatment Options ѹ Volume 4: Loading Protocols in Implant Dentistry – Edentulous Patients ѹ Volume 5: Sinus Floor Elevation Procedures ѹ Volume 6: Extended Edentulous Spaces in the Esthetic Zone ѹ Volume 7: Ridge Augmentation Procedures in Implant Patients – A Staged Approach ѹ Volume 8: Biological and Hardware Complications in Implant Dentistry ѹ Volume 9: Implant Therapy in the Geriatric Patient ѹ Volume 10: Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone – Current Treatment Modalities and Materials for Single-tooth Replacements ѹ Volume 11: Digital Workflows in Implant Dentistry |
What is Edentulous Patients? | ѹ Volume 1: Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone – Single-Tooth Replacements ѹ Volume 2: Loading Protocols in Implant Dentistry – Partially Dentate Patients ѹ Volume 3: Implant Placement in Post-Extraction Sites – Treatment Options ѹ Volume 4: Loading Protocols in Implant Dentistry – Edentulous Patients ѹ Volume 5: Sinus Floor Elevation Procedures ѹ Volume 6: Extended Edentulous Spaces in the Esthetic Zone ѹ Volume 7: Ridge Augmentation Procedures in Implant Patients – A Staged Approach ѹ Volume 8: Biological and Hardware Complications in Implant Dentistry ѹ Volume 9: Implant Therapy in the Geriatric Patient ѹ Volume 10: Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone – Current Treatment Modalities and Materials for Single-tooth Replacements ѹ Volume 11: Digital Workflows in Implant Dentistry |
When do we use Moderate Insertion Torque? | 1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30) 2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11 3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212 4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737 5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21 6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434 7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551 8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486 9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272 10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). "Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans." Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356. 11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). "Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760. 12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). "10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface." Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124. 13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). "Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial." Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961. 14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). "Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744. 15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115. 16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450 17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86 |
What are the key considerations for See Chapter? | Ideally, in the esthetic region, the implant shoulder should be positioned about $3-4{\mathsf{m m}}$ subgingival of the prospective gingival margin and with the correct implant orientation (See Chapter 4.3). |
What is the purpose of Biological? | ѹ Volume 1: Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone – Single-Tooth Replacements ѹ Volume 2: Loading Protocols in Implant Dentistry – Partially Dentate Patients ѹ Volume 3: Implant Placement in Post-Extraction Sites – Treatment Options ѹ Volume 4: Loading Protocols in Implant Dentistry – Edentulous Patients ѹ Volume 5: Sinus Floor Elevation Procedures ѹ Volume 6: Extended Edentulous Spaces in the Esthetic Zone ѹ Volume 7: Ridge Augmentation Procedures in Implant Patients – A Staged Approach ѹ Volume 8: Biological and Hardware Complications in Implant Dentistry ѹ Volume 9: Implant Therapy in the Geriatric Patient ѹ Volume 10: Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone – Current Treatment Modalities and Materials for Single-tooth Replacements ѹ Volume 11: Digital Workflows in Implant Dentistry |
How is Nelson used in the Straumann® system? | 1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30) 2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11 3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212 4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737 5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21 6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434 7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551 8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486 9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272 10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). "Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans." Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356. 11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). "Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760. 12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). "10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface." Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124. 13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). "Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial." Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961. 14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). "Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744. 15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115. 16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450 17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86 |
What is Milling? | Note: Milling cutters have no stop. Milling cutters must only be used for flattening the alveolar ridge. |
Why is Straumann important in implant procedures? | Straumann® and/or other trademarks and logos from Straumann® mentioned herein are the trademarks or registered trademarks of Straumann Holding AG and/or its affiliates. |
What are the key considerations for Belser? | Buser D./ Martin W./ Belser U.: Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla :anatomical and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2004; 19 Suppl: 43–61. |
What are the key considerations for Prosthetic Procedures? | ѹ Prosthetic Procedures for the Narrow Neck CrossFit® Implant – Straumann $\textcircled{1}$ Narrow Neck CrossFit® Implant Line (702058/en) ѹ Straumann® synOcta® Prosthetic System, Basic Information (702163/en) ѹ Cement-retained Crowns and Bridges with the Solid Abutment System: Straumann® Solid Abutment Prosthetic System (152.254/en) ѹ Straumann® Bone Level Prosthetic Procedures, Basic Information (702061/en) |
What is Minimum? | Minimum vertical space requirement for access with surgical instruments |
What is the purpose of Surgical Template? | ѹ Implants colored in green are compatible with the fully guided workflow. ѹ Implants colored in blue are too wide to fit through the $\mathcal{O}5.0\mathsf{m m}$ T-sleeves. Remove the Surgical Template after guided implant bed preparation and place the implant freehand. ѹ Implant colored in yellow offer guided pilot drilling only. |
When do we use Ridge Augmentation Procedures? | ѹ Volume 1: Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone – Single-Tooth Replacements ѹ Volume 2: Loading Protocols in Implant Dentistry – Partially Dentate Patients ѹ Volume 3: Implant Placement in Post-Extraction Sites – Treatment Options ѹ Volume 4: Loading Protocols in Implant Dentistry – Edentulous Patients ѹ Volume 5: Sinus Floor Elevation Procedures ѹ Volume 6: Extended Edentulous Spaces in the Esthetic Zone ѹ Volume 7: Ridge Augmentation Procedures in Implant Patients – A Staged Approach ѹ Volume 8: Biological and Hardware Complications in Implant Dentistry ѹ Volume 9: Implant Therapy in the Geriatric Patient ѹ Volume 10: Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone – Current Treatment Modalities and Materials for Single-tooth Replacements ѹ Volume 11: Digital Workflows in Implant Dentistry |
Why is With Straumann important in implant procedures? | ѹ After removing the implant from the solution, the SLActive® surface treatment is chemically active for 15 minutes. ѹ With Straumann® guided instruments, increased insertion torques can occur due to precise osteotomy preparation. ѹ For immediate loading, a final torque of at least 35 Ncm should be achieved ѹ Excessive insertion torque must be avoided because this can lead to over-compression of the bone. |
What are the key considerations for Standard Plus Im? | When inserting a Straumann® Standard Plus Implant up to the implant shoulder level (see Chapter 3), the preparation depth must be $2\mathsf{m m}$ deeper than the indicated implant length. (Example: The preparation depth for a $\boldsymbol{10}\boldsymbol{\mathrm{mm}}\mathsf{S P}$ Implant inserted up to shoulder level must be $12\mathsf{m m}$ .) The Profile Drill should also be used deeper for fine implant bed preparation. Examples are illustrated below |
Why is Salvi important in implant procedures? | 1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30) 2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11 3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212 4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737 5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21 6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434 7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551 8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486 9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272 10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). "Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans." Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356. 11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). "Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760. 12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). "10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface." Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124. 13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). "Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial." Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961. 14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). "Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque." Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744. 15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115. 16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450 17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86 |
Why is Drill Stop important in implant procedures? | For more information, please refer to Straumann® Drill Stop, Basic Information (702874/en). |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
🦷 Straumann Stage 2 – Instruction-Tuned Q&A Dataset
This dataset contains 300 domain-specific question–answer pairs generated from two technical manuals:
- Straumann® Dental Implant System
- Straumann® Guided Surgery System Instruments
Each entry is formatted as an instruction + response pair, optimized for use in training medical or dental assistant LLMs.
📁 Dataset Structure
Each example looks like:
{
"instruction": "What is the purpose of a guided pilot drill?",
"response": "The guided pilot drill is used to ensure accurate initial osteotomy depth and angulation based on the surgical plan."
}
- Downloads last month
- 31