diff --git a/data/part_2/0017402122.json b/data/part_2/0017402122.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ff4903ffdc8d6259623dbb8137a06c03de34ca6c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0017402122.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"5c18153fd9080ca4938eb1e311c2e644","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/1c3695c5-5f95-4173-b16c-c6976716aba7/retrieve","id":"-1504569634"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"9a28707e-4e56-4d81-aa45-67a9174dd80c","pagecount":"46","content":"In addition to the focus countries, regional engagement and a series of virtual events and stakeholder interviews have been synthesised into the knowledge series. We would like to thank the time and expertise from stakeholders for interviews, workshops, regional events and sharing their insights towards this important project.This section provides a brief analysis of the history, progress and key bottlenecks related to the Great Green Wall (GGW) initiative within Senegal. It also provides an overview of key institutions responsible for coordinating and implementing GGW-related activities within the focus country.The GGW in Senegal is 545 km long, 15 km wide and involves three regions: Louga, Matam and Tambacounda. The population affected by this project is 322 221 inhabitants.Senegal was one of the first countries where the GGW was operationalised, starting with the creation of the Senegalese National Agency of the Great Green Wall (ANGMV) in 2008, through the leadership of former President Abdoulaye Wade. In 2014 the GGW initiative was ratified.According to the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), the implementation of the GGW initiative can be attributed to institutional continuity between 2005 and 2012, and the active participation of scientific, institutional, research and academic partners, such as the Cheick Anta Diop Dakar University (UCAD), the Centre de Suivi Ecologique (CSE), the Institut Senegalais de Recherche Agricole, the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Agriculture (ILRI, 2022).In 2019, Haidar El Ali was appointed Director General of the Senegalese Agency for Reforestation and the GGW (ASERGMV). The Agency was by decree merged with two other structures, extending its portfolio to also cover eco-villages and reforestation (Savadogo, personal communication, 2022). As such, the newly created ASERGMV is a \"super structure\", based in Dakar, that operates under the technical supervision of the Minister of Forestry and the financial supervision of the Finance Ministry. It implements and overseas all sustainable land management (SLM) interventions nation-wide.ASERGMV now has three departments:1. The management of the GGW;2. The management of ecovillages; and,The management of reforestation.The Agency's core mandate is to continue to re-green the GGW area and to reforest the whole of Senegal. The 2020 GGW Global Report (UNFCCD, 2020) indicates that Senegal had restored a total area of 119 202 hectares (ha), as of 2019, broken down as follows: 72 452 ha reforested area, 33 500 under Assisted Natural Regeneration (ANR) and 13 205 km of windbreaks. These achievements required the production of 18 million seedlings/plants and resulted in the creation of 1 396 jobs.Total funding allocated to the GGW in Senegal, as of 2019, amounted to US$18.3 million of international funding (UNFCCD 2020). The domestic funding allocated to the GGW is not reported in the 2020 report.The ASERGMV's general mandate is to intensify reforestation, develop ecovillages and implement the GGW. This mandate includes mobilizing actors to implement and maintain reforestation activities, create green jobs, ensure access to renewable energy in ecovillages and support sound water management as well as sustainable funding sources for these eco-villages.The national strategy for the GGW focuses on:• Local appropriation -implementing GGW with and for local communities, through local authorities;• Development partnerships; and • Job creation for youth and women and poverty eradication (African Union 2022).The ASERGMV includes a Surveillance Council (which include a representative from the Presidency, representatives from the Ministries of Finances, Community Development, Agriculture, Forestry, Livestock, Wellbeing, Youth, and a representative from the Union of Associations of the Locally Elected Officials) who meet on a quarterly basis.The ASERGMV Director General is nominated by the Minister of Forestry and is responsible for ensuring the implementation of the decisions made by the Surveillance Council.In 2020, the Agency signed a framework agreement with the Programme for the Inclusive and Sustainable Development of Agriculture in Senegal (PDIDAS). Partnership agreements to support implementation were also signed with the Organisme National de Coordination des Activités de Vacances, which represents more than 7 600 sports and cultural associations in Senegal. Partnership agreements were also signed with numerous cities in the Louga, Thiès, Casamance and Tambacounda regions, as well as with CorpsAfrica (which has placed 20 volunteers in 10 regions in support of establishing Tolou Keur, i.e. 'circular gardens'), and with Fabrimétal in Dakar (which has developed a tree nursery near its factory, from where it distributes saplings free of charge for reforestation and sponsors the Tolou Keur of Belvédère).On the ground, 2 000 water and forestry agents are responsible for supporting the implementation of the programme in the field. These agents supervise the 7 000 young people recruited by the agency for GGW activities.All actors are represented within the national GGW multi-stakeholder consultation frameworks, including state structures, NGOs, civil society organisations, the private and parastatal sectors and research institutions. The modus operandi of these consultation frameworks at different levels is described below:• At the local level (local authorities/communes), meetings are held on a quarterly basis. The Agency signs territorial plans with monitoring and implementation mechanisms, validates the plans, and provides guidance and recommendations. Issues emerging from these local meetings are fed into the regional meetings (Diop, personal communication, 2022). To promote coordination the Agency has brought together all the mayors of the GGW intervention zone and established performance contracts. In addition, the Agency has recently set up a schedule of conditions between the communities (Ba, personal communication, 2022).• At the regional level, meetings are held every six months. The results of these meetings are consolidated in a follow-up report that is used to inform the annual national meeting (Diop, personal communication, 2022).• At the national level, an annual meeting is convened during which the work plan and budget for the coming year are validated. The ASERGMV submits an annual report to the Pan-African Agency of the GGW (PA-GGW). The technical committee of national GGW experts (focal points) meets once a year to prepare for the annual Council of Ministers of the Environment and the Conference of Heads of State (Diop, personal communication, 2022).Meetings with the PA-GGW and its implementation partners happen in an informal manner -meetings are organised on an ad hoc basis and this informal arrangement has proved functional (Boëte, personal communication, 2022).In March 2021, a Presidential Council on GGW met to discuss the development of a national coalition to implement GGW. This meeting resulted in 10 recommendations, including the creation of consultation frameworks at the national, regional and local level.The national consultation framework will gather actors across all relevant ministries, as well as civil society, to leverage the GGW for resilient socioeconomic development. In addition, local planning contracts will be signed with all 17 local authorities in order to increase local communities' participation in the GGW, with technical, financial and operational support provided by the Government of Senegal (AU, 2022).In March 2021, Oumar Abdoulaye Ba was appointed the Director General of the ASERGMV. He has been described by his peers as very dynamic and pro-active. Since his arrival, ASERGMV has been revitalised, with more partnerships and better visibility in the field. Upon taking office, the Director General took European Union and US ambassadors to the GGW field sites to sensitize them to the project.The Director General is reportedly reviewing the Agency's organisational chart and is actively putting the ASERGMV on a highly technological pathway (Ba, personal communication, 2022). This technological focus is apparent in the strategic orientation of the Agency , as captured by the UNCDD (2002). The Great Green Wall Accelerator's briefing note underlines Senegal's focus on the \"promotion of the green economy, articulated around the strengthening of SMEs and their economic environment\" (GGW Pillar 1: Investment in farms, value chains, local markets, exports), as well as on the \"development of techniques and technologies for reforestation and integrated and sustainable management of ecosystems\" (GGW Pillar 2: Land restoration and sustainable management of ecosystems). With regards to the GGW Pillar 3 (Climate resilient infrastructures and access to renewable energy), Senegal's priority is to \"develop techniques and technologies that are resilient to climate change both in the field of agro-sylvo-pastoral and fishing production (food security), in access to alternative energy (energy security) and in the prevention of risks and disasters\". This is illustrated for instance by the purchase of solar powered digging machinery (Ba, personal communication, 2022). Under GGW Pillar 4 (Frameworks for effective governance, sustainability, stability and security), Senegal's reported main intent is to \" improv(e) the institutional and economic environment of the programme intervention area\". Lastly, in terms of the Agency's capacity building priority (GGW Pillar 5) Senegal seeks to \"develop capacity building activities for the various stakeholders for the effective, efficient, and sustainable implementation of the programme\" (UNCCD, 2022:25).Among the new partnerships engaged in by the Agency, notable is the partnership with the Moroccan Office Cherifien des Phosphates. Through this partnership, ASERGMV has acquired new equipment such a solar-powered shovel tractor to plant trees (Ba, personal communication, 2022).The ASERGMV, under the leadership of the new Director General, embarked on a new 'Integrator' programme for the GGW. This programme is providing support for the development of a new fiveyear strategic plan for the ASERGMV.One of the challenges highlighted by national GGW stakeholders was that many of the programmes had limited impact at ground level. Sufficient studies have been done on the biophysical context for land restoration in Senegal, but the funds are not reaching the communities. Generally, the sense was that an adequate skills base was in place, but the costs of land restoration processes was a barrier. That being said, new skills development may be required as ASERGMV ratchets up its use of modern technologies, for example, training on the piloting of drones.A key issue plaguing the progress of the GGW, as related by the GGW Director in Senegal, Colonel Diop, is the lack of adequate and systematic information sharing. This challenge will be addressed by a new communications department withinASERGMV.There is also further work to be done in terms of the analysis of degraded lands in Senegal. It has been suggested that the Institute of Soil Science needs to strengthen the technical capacity of its teams to support accurate assessment of the total amount of degraded land by type of degradation and to assess all the land restoration interventions that are being carried out. This would allow stakeholders to better understand the status of national land restoration efforts, identify good practice, and assess progress against stated policy objectives (Sow, personal communication, 2022).The ASERGMV is currently working to translate into a national programme the PA-GGW Decennial Priority Investment Plan (DPIP) Critical bottlenecks flagged with regards to researchinclude:• Technical expertise in restoration is not matched by strong research on the socio-economic dimensions of restoration, which might constitute one of the main stumbling blocks to the longterm sustainability of interventions;• Critical research topics concerning water stress and water management are not adequately addressed;• The lack of coordination in the research undertaken around the GGW;• The lack of a central repository where all the research linked to the GGW in Senegal could be housed;• Research is often top down and not fed back to the community level;• The lack of research funding to support Senegalese researchers. Research organisations such as the Observatoire Homme-Milieu could increase their research production if more funding was allocated to support PHD and Master candidates;• Research grants are allocated for short time periods (2-3 years), whereas the monitoring of restoration takes place over long time periods (i.e. 10 years); and,• There are gaps in the mapping of stakeholders on the ground and facilitation of information flow to synergise initiatives.Senegal's needs around consolidating platforms is ambiguous. Colonel Diop, the GGW-A Director, has argued that there are already adequate consultation frameworks and that the focus should lie in strengthening these platforms rather than creating new ones. He further underlined that those platforms set up by international NGOs are not sustainable.Others also argue that existing platform structures, especially those that seek to integrate SLM efforts, need additional support. The multi-stakeholder, inter-ministerial platform called the National Strategic Investment Framework for Sustainable Land Management is a case in point. This platform was originally launched under the Terra Africa platform and administered by the World Bank. It was then formally adopted as a ministerial framework in 2014, with support from the EU. This framework brings together different actors working on SLM, in an attempt to integrate interventions related to the GGW. The framework includes a portfolio of projects and is intended to be a framework for dialogue and investment in SLM. However, this framework is not very active.The actors want a formalisation of this organisational structure, which is one of the objectives of the Riposte project. For a while the committee sought formal recognition from the Presidency, then from the office of the Prime Minister. In October 2022, all the stakeholders involved in the platform met and decided that the platform would fall under the Ministry of Agriculture, and a committee was established to support further activities. The committee drafted a technical note addressed to the Ministry of Agriculture in support of the institutionalisation of this structure. Strategic partners were also requested to support this initiative (Sow, personal communication, 2022). Engagement with various stakeholders in the 1. The Decennial Priority Investment Plan (DPIP) will be a reference framework for planning and technical and financial execution of the activities and financial resources required for their implementation. The national consultation framework initiated by the National Agency of Senegal is focused on fostering a national coalition to gather actors across all Ministries, as well as civil society, to leverage GGW for resilient, socio-economic development. This is reflected in the above mentioned effort by the Agency to establish local planning contracts with 17 local authorities in order to increase local communities' participation in the GGW, with technical, financial and operational support provided by the Government of Senegal (AU 2022).Prior to the establishment of the GGW national coalition in early 2022, stakeholders underlined that there was a dire lack of inclusion and information sharing with many relevant actors. However, all key stakeholders were included in the establishment of the national coalition and the activities of the coalition itself may well serve to address these concerns. Going forward, there is a need to ensure the systematic inclusion and information sharing with all actors (including non-state actors) relevant to the GGW (Mbaye, personal communication, 2022). At a national level, a priority should be to support formalising the National Strategic Investment Framework for Sustainable Land Management (Sow, personal communication, 2022).There doesn't seem to be a system of clear data and evidence organisation related to the GGW ambitions and this lack of a centralised system was flagged as problematic by the GGW Accelerator. The ASEGMV website is out of date and, in the words of the Director, information is not shared adequately, which gives a poor reflection of the work Senegal is doing and undermines its relationships with other governmental entities, the donor community and non-state actors (Diop, personal communication, 2022).At the national level, each entity has its own data. The research identified several initiatives involved in centralising data linked to SLM and climate change on existing platforms: • The National Council for Food Security has developed a Land Resource Information System (SIRT) to use modern information and communication technologies to provide information on the specific resourcesbiophysical, social and economic -of each of the defined territories. It is also a tool for integrating this knowledge for better decision-making in support of enhanced food security and resilience.• A database of reforestation and GGW initiatives and actors is listed on a Google Maps database.The latest updates to the map date back to 2021 and speak of the tree planting the Agency supported in some areas.There are several climate information services (CIS) available in Senegal:• Two additional platforms with a focus on climate change adaptation will be developed for Senegal by ClimBer through the Governance for Resilience (G4R) project, which will be rolled out in 2022-2025. These are:• The Early Warning, Early Action, Early Finance (AWARE) platform that will be used as trigger mechanism to manage the response to floods and droughts, developing standard operating procedures with the relevant stakeholder coalitions. The purpose is not to duplicate data but to co-create locally-owned specific datasets for Senegal, reflecting the needs of disaster risk management stakeholders in Senegal (ClimBer 2022).• The ClimAdapt-Gov dashboard aims at empowering farmers, communities and policy planners to help community or provincial level organisations assess different resilience strategies at their scale, using simple resilience assessment indicators that could monitor if the portfolio of adaptation options they chose is right for their community and if there is resilience impact (ClimBer, 2022).The World Overview of Conservation Approaches and Technologies (WOCAT) is a global network aiming to document, share, and apply SLM knowledge. The network establishes an innovative space for sharing and scaling good practices to address land degradation, climate change, and biodiversity loss. This facilitates local, national, regional and global knowledge sharing and analysis of which good practices work where, how and why, and their costs and benefits. The WOCAT Global SLM Database has been officially recognised by the UNCCD as the primary recommended global database for SLM best practice. The best practice adopted by the GGW are profiled on the WOCCAT database.Through the support of the TerrAfrica Leveraging Fund, TerrAfrica's Regional SLM Knowledge Base has been established. It contains tools, documents, and practical information to assist in sustainable land and water management upscaling at national, regional and continental level. Senegal is in the process of creating a country-specific information system based on this system. One of the main tools of the TerrAfrica platform is the Country SLM Investment Framework (CSIF), which aims to provide guidance on the design and implementation of SLM investment frameworks at national level. The Green Alliance for Reforestation is a non-state initiative developing platforms based on satellite imagery. This is an interactive platform where large international NGOs can create awareness around their initiatives. This NGO database does not include state programmes and activities.The key needs related to institutional strengthening in Senegal include:• The development of a robust M&E system: This is an issue the GGW Accelerator is seeking to address. It is worth noting that the Ministry of Environment is implementing a monitoring system to inform the Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) of Senegal, with support from the French Development Agency (ClimBer, 2022). This M&E system should be integrated into the GGW system.• Senegal needs to build capacity of the various stakeholders for the effective, efficient, and sustainable implementation of programmes, as identified in the GGW results framework (UNFCCD 2022a:26).• The Land Degradation Assessment (2008) developed a baseline scenario of land degradation for Senegal and subsequently set the country's restoration targets. However, since then there has been no inventory update. Capacity building is required on the use of improved methodologies and tools to carry out such an update (Sow, personal communication, 2022).• Optimising information sharing between stakeholders through online collaboration (identifying the right tools and methodologies).• There is a need to build a strong community base to support the sustainability of national GGW activities and reduce implementation costs.There is also a need to undertake more rigorous evaluation of the success rate of tree planting programmes (ILRI, 2022).2 Bottlenecks for GGW's implementation • Support the formalisation of the National Strategic Investment Framework for Sustainable Land Management.• All the codes that deal with the same resources should be merged under a common heading and addressed under relevant categories.• The inconsistency of public policies is reflected by a poor harmonisation between regulations on decentralization, land use planning, mining operations (mining code), forestry code, agriculture, pastoral development strategies and land laws, which maintain the different resource managers and management in a siloed sectoral vision.• What is lacking in the policy framework is a process/law articulating the synergies between different forms of land use. The Forestry Code, the Water Code and the Agro-Pastoral Law need to be synergized through a focus on development, taking the drivers of degradation into account.• Weak communication and lack of information sharing are highlighted by the GGW Director as critical bottlenecks.• According to Col Diop, these shortcomings will be remedied with the new communication department of the ASERGMV• A global study on the contribution of NGOs in reforestation and addressing desertification would be required (Ba, personal communication, 2022).• The image of the Agency is poor in relation to donors. Information is not up to date or transparent (Diop, personal communication, 2022).• Ecosystem restoration is not only focused on recovering the ecological function of degraded ecosystems; it also involves changes in land management. Large scale agro-industrial development still features strongly in Senegal (despite strong emphasis on supporting an agroecology transition) which is contradictory to the recommended land management practices linked to restoration.• Despite the fact that some key documents support agroforestry, for example: • ANR and agroforestry should be adopted by the Ministry of Agriculture, as well as the MEDD, as essential elements of agricultural extension to achieve real impact on agricultural productivity and resilience.• This could form part of a possible revision of the Agro-pastoral Orientation Law.• In the Ferlo region pressures on silvo-pastoral resources are already exacerbated by climate change, competition for land, and competition between users. In this context, reforestation of plots to which access is prohibited seems to be an additional factor in the fragmentation of the pastoral space and the immediate removal of resources without compensation (Goffner et al 2022).• Scope for mainstreaming land restoration into the Plan for an Emerging Senegal.Description and underlying factors How this can be addressed within the country• Incomplete decentralization processes limit the effectiveness of local institutions (including those overseeing land management) to support national land restoration initiatives. Senegal is slightly in advance, with their decentralization law completed, however the transfer of financial resources from the state to the local government remains challenging.• The decentralization reforms undertaken in Senegal in 1996 and 1998 conferred various prerogatives on rural communities in the management of natural resources.• All prerogatives are held by the local government, but natural resource management issues are often neglected in favour of other sectors and issues (health, education, etc.).• Weak capacity of local authorities in terms of intellectual and technical skills.• Competences transferred without commensurate transfer of resources.• Establish legislative and regulatory frameworks supportive of local initiatives.• The Senegalese land tenure system is characterized by a plurality of norms that is manifested by the coexistence of customary law (widely applied by local communities) and modern land legislation• There is no formal recognition in the forestry legislation that farmers have an exclusive right to the trees resulting from ANR on their fields• There is a need to put up fences before reforestation efforts commence.• Support land tenure security mechanisms developed in collaboration with local authorities that will ensure that local actors, especially women, and investors benefit from the added value generated by their interventions.• The lack of a coherent policy framework results in failures to take advantage of synergies between projects related to land restoration. This leads to an inefficient use of time and resources and ultimately undermines the effectiveness of interventions (Sow, personal communication, 2022).• There is a need to strengthen the coherence of action at the level of the governorates and prefects, whose mission is to promote community dialogue; there is a lot of duplication in the field and a lack of coordination of actions -it is necessary to harmonize this and allow for efficiency of actions (Ba, personal communication, 2022).• Local populations perceive GGW projects such market gardens or large scale SLM as a government environmental project with a \"top-down\" logic disconnected from local realities• A tendency has prevailed to implement the GGW with a \"one size fits all\" approach, whereas each and every socio-ecosystem along the GGW route is unique, with its own characteristics and dynamics, calling for adapting and aligning actions implemented accordingly. \"This alignment requires in-depth knowledge of each socio-ecosystem, as a condition for success and acceptance of future actions. However, the time required for diagnosis, analysis and consultation is often considered incompatible with the urgency felt by decision-makers and GGW implementers.\" (Goffrey et al 2022).• There are reports that the protocol for planting is so strict that other potential partners are precluded from being incorporated into the GGW. 2• The implementation of each project is to be preceded by a grounded consultation and co-design with each community, with a greater focus on political ecology.Exclusion of farmers • The GGW is problematic by design -the chosen location is essentially a pastoral axis, hence the importance of consulting the herders -this implies a strong capacity building and engagement of communities in designing interventions (Ka, personal communication, 2022).• Lack of effective inclusion of a wide range of key actors, e.g. producer organisation are the grassroots of the GGW. The options advocated by producer organisations are often very close to the objectives of the GGW; they should be an integral part of the implementation of the GGW (Garreau, personal communication, 2022).• The proposed 10 recommendations brought forward by the UNFCCC (2021) to improve the work of the national coalition address these concerns.• Put in place practical mechanisms for planning dialogue and action at the local and national levels, especially focusing on producer organisations. This would allow for getting closer to producers' organisations and to associating them with the GGW, taking into consideration their natural resource management strategies (UNFCCC, 2021).• Elevate the GGW as a tool for improving the livelihood of populations to the highest political level.• The solution is to work through the farmers' organisations, so that the communities and other stakeholders carry the project. The CNCR is present in the 14 regions, it includes grassroots farmers' organisations.Participation by the CNCR could allow better implementation and sustainability of the project.• A study on the mobilization of non-state stakeholders of the GGW found that the implementation of the initiative was top down, technocratic and non-inclusive. Greater involvement of CSOs and research actors in the dynamics of the GGW should be encouraged via a support programme for the field actors of the GGW (UNFCCC, 2021).• Failing to introduce these actors in projects will result in the risk that \"the projects presented (lack) territorial anchorage\". Funding partners should be encouraged to set up dedicated funding programmes for these actors (UNFCCC, 2022:14).• Set up multi-stakeholder, multi-sector dialogue mechanisms around the objectives of the GGW• Involve local authorities in project management and the implementation of the GGW projects• For better connections between GGW actors, harness existing opportunities and knowledge through the creation of a GGW multi-stakeholder hub.• Establish practical, simple and clear criteria and procedures for engagement.• Integrate the greatest number of actors through a system of recognition of different levels of commitment of actors and actions (UNFCCD 2022).• National coalitions should enable the establishment of MoU between ministries and decentralized institutions, municipalities and cities, so that states can request dedicated funding for GGW municipal plans (UNFCCD 2022).Description and underlying factors How this can be addressed within the country• The populations that benefit from the land restoration measures must be able to take over from the state services. However often the lack of ownership and co-design of interventions with the local populations, as well as other factors such as access to resources and the absence of land tenure rights, are all factors inhibiting the buy in form local beneficiary populations.• Lack of genuine support from pastoral communities.• The humanitarian approach to implementing market gardens compromises their long-term sustainability. For instance, the \"Food for Work\" programme consist of providing women's groups with food aid; it is conditional on their participation in the farm plot. But most development initiatives do not yield high economic returns. This poor productive and financial performance might condemn them to remain dependent on programmes such as the GGW and actors such as the World Food Programme. This is the major ambiguity of the GGW gardens which, in attempting to promote tools for the fight against poverty, adopt the institutionalized practices of humanitarian aid.• Given that this is their environment, rather than talking about a lack of ownership, we should talk about a lack of project continuity at the GGW level (Ka, personal communication, 2022).• Implementation of GGW projects rely on existing instruments of territorial governance and shared resource management, such as pastoral units, borehole management committees and communal councils. The GGW would thus be catalytic to consultation processes and to consolidate decision-making and management bodies at the intermunicipal level for SLM.• Farmers and farmer organisations lack technical capacity.• Supporting their technical staff is an action that the Accelerator should consider (UNCCD 2022). There are only a small number of NGOs with the required expertise on these issues.• Entry points identified by the GGW Accelerator: \"In West Africa, the ROPPA network took the lead in January 2020 in the so-called West African initiative on agroecology and is a good entry point. (...) Farmerto-farmer exchanges have proven to be a powerful tool for scaling up agroecological techniques.\"• While there is mention of gender equity and inclusion of women, youth and other groups in situations of vulnerability in the policy documents, there is a lack of coordinated planning and activities able to address the root causes of inequalities. Most of the actions relate to solving the current needs of these groups, but there is less focus on changing their status through addressing their strategic needs.• Land restoration is extremely costly.• Insufficient logistics given the isolation of reforestation areas.• ASGGMR has embarked on a hightech drive to increase the pace at which activities are deployed on the ground (modern machinery, etc.).• Many land restoration targets and commitments rely heavily on funding from external donors. The GGW was expected to receive financial support from the government, local authorities and villagers, while these entities, particularly at the local level, have limited capacities for resources mobilization.• The main obstacle to the mobilization of resources is the positioning of national agencies. These agencies are under the direction of their country's Ministry of the Environment. However, the financial partners all dialogue at the level of each country with one interlocutor: the Ministry of Finance and Planning.• \"There is a need to communicate about the opportunities available, not only to the Ministry of Finance and Planning, but also to the sectoral ministries that prepare projects for the government budget\" (UNFCC 2021:5).Description and underlying factors How this can be addressed within the countryWater scarcity • The GGW operates in water constrained environments, with deep aquifers (230 m) compounded by climate change (delayed arrival of long rains).• There is tremendous pressure from pastoralist communities on government to drill boreholes for their livestock. The Agency promised many boreholes -the most challenging area is the Ferlo region.• There is a high mortality of seedlings -approximately half the seedlings are lost before planting or at planting due to water constraints, cattle roaming and fire damage (ICLEI, 2022).Freshly transplanted trees need extra water due to the lack of moisture in the soil.• The agency is planning on multiplying boreholes in the region. It has acquired highly technological equipment. It is important to verify whether there is enough water to irrigate newly restored land. This has long term consequences on the use of underground water.• The water stress issue has implications from a gender perspective -women are forced to allocate significant time to collecting and transporting water.• Alternatives to and better management of water points/ponds.• Studies required on the replenishment of underground water given the high intensity of boreholes being created.• Some actors contend that uncertainty remains in terms of the most optimal species, whereas some maintain that the optimal species are known but that improvements could be done in terms of the management of these species.• Different use of space by several actors e.g. pastoralists and farmers.• Livestock wandering in reforested plots leads to inter-community conflicts. Incidents of open provocation by pastoralists have been reported, with livestock keepers walking their herds through the GGW perimeter at night during the season when pastures are abundant (i.e when there is no scarcity of feed); this has been construed as a sign of provocation towards the GGW (Ouedraogo, personal communication, 2022).• Maintenance of measures to guard against external attacks (firewalls, fences, etc.).• \"In Senegal, the government introduced the concept of pastoral units (PUs) in the 1980s around water points with the objective to sustainably manage resources and spaces for the benefit of local populations and the community of transhumant pastoralists. Despite their apparent success, PUs have been implemented in a top-down manner and have failed to invest in or empower pastoral communities to manage the PUs. Once management plans are established, the PUs are often left without supervision, capacity building programmes or monitoring and as a result, management plans are rarely implemented. Where pastoral unit management bodies exist, they are often politicized and heavily influenced by local chiefs.\"• The PRM approach can assist in overcoming these shortcomingit is embedded in local land use practices with the community, building on customary management and governance norms. PRM can help bring a greater degree of community participation by including women and youth and in managing activities and interventions contributing to the GGW, where the mainly top-down approach to date has excluded communities and, in some situations, has created conflict with them.• The GGW does not go through protected forest areas but through silvo-pastoral areas, and one of the important challenges to be taken into account in planning human developments in the area is the sharp increase in the number of farms in the western zone. At the time, the law prohibited the development of crops in this area, but the agricultural sector is progressing, and livestock numbers in this area is increasing.In the northern part, there are important hydro-agricultural developments that favour crop production; in this sense, the government responds to the needs of the population, particularly in terms of agriculture, but the ecological aspect does not figure sufficiently in the planning.• The theme of water usage should be rethought within a framework of resource management, which calls for a revision of the Silvo-pastoral Law (2004), in order to accommodate these new dynamics (Ndiaye, personal communication, 2022).Description and underlying factors How this can be addressed within the countryLacking M&E system • There is no systematic way of tracking and reporting on the progress made towards achieving SLM that addresses and meet the GGW goals (regionally applicable). This was underlines by Colonel Diop as the 'weakest link'. He says that 'we are aware of the gaps and problems, but the reality is that most people only see the money and the very large amounts. When the US$1.7 billion is announced, there is a rush, there is no excitement about the impact and results' (Diop, personal communication, 2022).• Lack of reliable monitoring and evaluation system for strong reporting on the achievements of the GGW. In policy documents, emphasis is put on reports, making it difficult to trace and verify the interventions' results.• Obsolete datasets for tracking land degradation and impact of interventions. The 2008 land degradation assessment gives a baseline scenario of land degradation. This dataset is outdated and mid-term inventory of degradation is required.• Improve M&E by setting up a system accessible to all actors that centralises all knowledge for innovations in the field.• Undertake a mid-term appraisal of the status of land degradation in Senegal. • Explore the possibility of a \"GGW\" label which actors can used depending on their level of contributions to the GGW.• The evaluation of the effectiveness of investments related to the fight against land degradation should be inseparable from the inventory of global investments made at the level of the concerned sectors of activity (agriculture, livestock, water, etc.). However, in the absence of analytical accounting, it is difficult to know the real share of the total amount of investments that have had a positive impact on actions to combat land degradation.• A review of the Sahelian GGW reveals a \"predominance of ecological studies in the GGW literature and a concentration of studies in certain geographies of interest, such as northern Senegal\" (Bruckmann et al, 2022).• Redress this research bias by supporting research focusing on socio-economic and other aspects of GGW implementation, as well as addressing geographic bias.• Research funding is often allocated for short (2-3 year) time frames, which is deemed highly insufficient to capture the outcome of reforestation projects, taking social dynamics into account -these research time frames need to be expanded to a 10-year period (Mbaye, personal communication, 2022).• Set up a mechanism to centralise all scientific and technical information and innovation and to easily disseminate findings, strengthen knowledge exchange, and promote valorisation of research findings.• Often research outcomes are not fed back to the level of community-based organisations that could benefit from these research findings.• As above -promote the establishment of observatories. Under the MEDD, the key departments are:• The Directorate of Water, Forests, Hunting, and Soil Conservation (DEFCCS), which helps implement GGW activities on the ground The Senegalese Agency for Reforestation and the GGW falls under the Presidency.Local authorities are the custodians of local land management and access to resources (tenure, land use, etc.). They are responsible for local development planning and are equipped with legal tools adapted to this responsibility. Local government entities (\"collectivités territoriales\") further play a role in institutionalizing rural participation in national policy commitments; help form federations of elected local authorities; and support public forums to debate national policies that affect rural populations. These institutions also play an important role in developing models of natural resource management and in informing rural populations of their rights and the roles and powers of their elected representatives.The Association of Mayors of Senegal plays a role in training municipal councils on policy frameworks (especially around decentralisation functions) and on their rights as local representatives and the means by which they can defend, exercise and develop these rights.The Agency for National Statistics and Demographics (ANSD) centralizes and disseminates statistical data produced by the national statistical system. The Agency is also responsible for monitoring international technical cooperation on statistics. In this capacity, it represents Senegal in subregional, regional and international meetings relating to matters within its competence and monitors the activities of international organisations in the field of statistics. At the request of the government and public and private entities, the Agency may undertake research on statistical, economic and social issues.The National Agricultural and Rural Advisory Agency (ANCAR) manages agricultural and rural advisory services throughout Senegal. It develops a decentralized agricultural advisory system, working for the producer organizations through a participatory approach based on partnership. It has set up the Agricultural Services and Digital Inclusion in Africa (SAIDA) platform.The National Food Security Council (CNSA) was created in 1998. The Executive Secretariat of the National Food Security Council (SECNSA) was created within the CNSA. Its function is to inform all decisions in the field of food security and resilience, to facilitate the monitoring and evaluation of the food security and resilience policies and programmes, to participate in the mobilization of financial resources for the national food security and resilience system; and to facilitate consultation, synergy and ensure complementarity between actors involved in the implementation of food security and resilience projects and programmes. This Council is responsible for providing food insecurity early warnings, with two important meetings every year where all food security actors gather to analyse and map the food security situation for Senegal.• The AfDB has in 2021 pledged US$6.5 billion in support of the GGW. It is involved in the recently launched Africa Integrated Climate Risk Management Programme.• The West African Development Bank (BOAD) announced that between 2024 and 2034, the \"100 Million Trees\" project will bring together the efforts of eight West African countries mobilised against desertification. This major reforestation operation will cover the entire West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) zone, as part of the GGW. • The European Investment Bank funds several environmental projects in Senegal.• Green Climate fund (GCF) funds a number • The ASERGMV has signed a framework agreement with the Programme for the Inclusive and Sustainable Development of Agriculture in Senegal (PDIDAS), a programme initiated in 2014 with funding from the World bank and the GEF and another specific agreement for the implementation of the following activities:• The demarcation and signposting of eight classified forests in the Saint-Louis region.• The construction of three nurseries, two in the Saint-Louis region and one in the Louga region.• The production of 800 000 seedlings of a dozen species.• Capacity building of actors grouped in Intervillages Association (AIV).• The establishment of 40 000 ha of land degradation defences.• The development of nine development and management plans (PAG).• These activities will, among other things, contribute to the increase of the vegetation cover rate, the management of biodiversity and the development of income-generating activities in the regions of Saint-Louis and Louga.• The OPEC Fund for International Development contributed financially to the Agricultural Development and Rural Entrepreneurship Programme -Phase II (PADAER-II).• As France relaunched the GGW initiative at the One Planet Summit in January 2021, by announcing the creation of the GGW Accelerator, the French Development Agency (FDA) naturally features as one of the primary development partners, especially in Senegal. The FDA positions itself as a key strategic partner of the GGW Accelerator.• The EU supports several land restoration and agro-ecologically focused projects. See the EU funded project database for further details. Amongst the EU-funded projects is Regreening Africa.• The African Risk Capacity (ARC) Group is involved in the recently launched Africa Integrated Climate Risk Management Programme.• USAID funds the Feed the Future Senegal Agricultural Policy and Reform Support Project (PSS).• The Canadian (Quebec) Union des producteurs agricoles du Québec (UPADI) has been working with the CNCR on SLM projects country wide.• The Moroccan Office Cherifien des Phosphates (OCO) features among key partners to the Agency, providing modern equipment to improve planting.• GIZ supports land tenure security among the rural population and is very involved with developing a sustainable electricity supply through the deployment of renewable energy and the promotion of energy efficiency measures. A project on \"climate-friendly cooking\" in Senegal is underway (2020-24). Local and international NGOs working on land restoration, climate change and land management include:• The Organisme National de Coordination des Activités de Vacances which accounts for more than 7 600 sports and cultural associations.• Fabrimétal has developed a tree nursery near its factory, from which it provides saplings free of change in support of reforestation, as well as sponsoring the the Tolou Keur (\"circular gardens) of Belvédère. 3• IUCN is a membership union uniquely composed of both government and civil society organisations. It has recently called for bringing back the focus on the wetlands and water issues within the GGW. A biodiversity status assessment of the GGW was undertaken in 2017 \"Biodiversity and the GGW: Managing nature for sustainable development in the Sahel\".• Oxfam is involved in the Regreening Africa project and support small scale agricultural projects in Senegal.• CARE is involved in the Regreening Africa project.• Catholic Relief Services are involved in the Regreening Africa project.• The Pierre Rabhi Endowment fund supports associations with agroecological work in Senegal.• SOS SAHEL is a French NGO currently active in 11 countries in the Sahel, from Senegal to Djibouti. It helps rural communities in sub-Saharan Africa to guarantee their food security and nutritional quality in a sustainable manner that respects their environment. The NGO has been actively involved in the GGW. It has taken part in identifying GGW champions and has, together with the 1t.org platform 4 , which is hosted by the World Economic Forum, formed a partnership to support the GGW. This initiative is focused on encouraging the establishment of partnerships around landscape restoration, supporting and strengthening the visibility of Sahelian eco-preneurs, and attracting investment for restoration in the Sahel.• Sahel Eco has signed a partnership agreement with the Pan-African Agency for Food Security to strengthen collaboration between governments and civil society actors. It also runs the GGW Partners' Platform.• The NGO Elevage Sans Frontières has supported several livestock projects in Senegal.• Entrepreneurs Without Borders (OZG) is implementing agroforestry projects in Senegal.• World Vision has committed with ministries and national networks to institutionalise ANR and other sustainable land use practices.• The Association for the Promotion of Agroforestry and Forestry (APAF) is a peasant organisation that supports the application of agroforestry techniques.• Reforest'Action plants trees to restore soils depleted by decades of groundnut cultivation.Planted by and for the local farmers, the trees protect their fields and secure their crops.• WeForest is a Belgium NGO which supports local governance frameworks in the GGW project areas. In Senegal, Weforest is involved in rehabilitating mangroves. It was involved in a reforestation project of 1 000 ha in the silvopastoral zone of Ferlo, a three-year pilot project with a view to scaling up over 10 years (Neyra, personal communication, 2022).• The \"Sukyo Mahikari\" association has been working alongside the Forestry Service on a voluntary basis on large-scale actions, notably through group of young people from different countries in Europe, America, Asia and Africa, to participate in the building of the GGW programme (GGW Action Plan 2011).• University Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar (UCAD) has been involved in GGW activities through reforestation activities, as well as providing medical care and literacy training, in particular to women's groups and youth associations, as a contribution to the building of the GGW by students and teachers with the support of the competent services (GGW Action Plan 2011).• Union Nationale des Exploitants Forestiers du Sénégal (National Union of Forest Users) (UNCEFS), has also been active in the field assisting the GGW. • Agrécole Afrique uses an approach based on agroecology, on the social economy of solidarity and the development of innovations to help the population in a situation of poverty to become aware of this situation of vulnerability, to organize and mobilize themselves to better produce while respecting the environment, the earth and the health of people and animals, all in a participatory and responsible management.• ENDA Pronat is a preeminent NGO in Senegal.It is a member of the international network Enda Tiers Monde, of the Senegalese National Federation for Organic Agriculture (FENAB) and leads the Avaclim research in Senegal. ENDA Pronat sits on the Cadre de Réflexion et d'Action sur le Foncier au Sénégal (land tenure think tank in Senegal -CRAFS), the multistakeholder task force for the promotion of agroecology in Senegal (TaFAé), and the national Alliance for Agroecology in West Africa (3AO) steering committee. The NGO is secretary of the Dynamique National pour la Transition Agroécologique au Sénégal (DyTAES), focal point of the Coalition for the Protection of African Genetic Heritage (COPAGEN) at the national level and also of the sub-regional and international networks COPAGEN, and participates in the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa (AFSA).• The National Partnership for Senegal's Water (Partenariat National de l'Eau du Sénégal -PNES) is an association working in the field of integrated water resource management.• The Platform of European NGOs in Senegal is a network of NGOs that was formed with the objective of creating synergies and establishing new partnerships. It aims to strengthen the effectiveness of the participation of its members in the economic, social and cultural development of Senegal. It seeks to promote dialogue between the different civil society actors in Senegal.Total Energies Foundation has in 2018 partnered with the Téssékéré International Human and Environment Observatory, which is working in Senegal to promote the sharing of experiences between states and raise awareness of the project among local communities.The Jokalante platform combines feedback mechanisms, IVR systems, voice services, SMS, social media and data collection tools. Through local community radios, a dynamic web platform and dedicated agents, Jokalante creates linkages with the rural population. Jokalante works with ANACIM (a climate information institution) to scale the distribution of this information.MLouma is a company specialized in the digitalization of agriculture; with the support of several partners (ICCO, USAID, UNCDF, ICRISAT, ANACIM, ORANGE, OCP, MEDA), mLouma has in recent years developed a range of tools that address the problems of producers based on specifications developed by international organisations. Assists the agency in the planification of the activities and the formulation of some indicators. Gives orientations in order to inform all decisions in the field of food security and resilience, to facilitate the monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of food security and resilience policies and programmes, to participate in the mobilization of financial resources for the national food security and resilience system; to facilitate consultation and complementarity.To be involved in GGW to foster synergy and ensure complementarity between actors involved in the implementation of food security and resilience projects and programmes.Identify synergy and ensure complementarity in the fields of food security and resilience, access to funding opportunities.The Resources to pursue restoration activities.On site implementation of restoration.ONCAV (Organisme National de Coordination des Activités de Vacances) which counts more than 7600 Sports and Cultural Associations in SenegalPartner of the ANGMV for the realization of land restoration activities.Resources to pursue restoration activities.On site implementation of restoration.Partner of the ANGMV for the realization of land restoration activities and developed a tree nursery.Resources to pursue nursery/tree planting activities.On site implementation of restoration.Has been working alongside the forestry service on a voluntary basis on large-scale actions.Resources to pursue restoration activities.Participation in the building of the GGW programme. Resources to pursue restoration activities.On site diffusion of agroforestry techniques.Reforest'Action Plants trees in agroforestry initiatives.Resources to pursue restoration activities.On site diffusion of agroforestry techniques.Partners with the PPSZ in researching social dynamics and setting up local governance frameworks in the GGW project areas.To be part of the Alliance.On site diffusion of agro-forestry techniques.Partner of the ANGMV for the realization of land restoration activities -has placed 20 volunteers in 10 regions for Tolou Keur and with Fabrimétal in Dakar.Not known.Availing volunteers to project sites.This network brings together different associations of farmers, fishermen, foresters, breeders, women's organisations, the youth college, 32 national peasant federations in all.In each federation there are hundreds of organisations; some are structured by region or by association (there are 38 associations that cover specific localities).It launched the National family farming Observatory and in 2015 it drove the launch of the National Observatory for land tenure.Inclusion in GGW Alliance.Works in projects that seek to promote a community-based natural resource management approach to GGW projects.Best placed organisation to make linkages with farmer sat ground level and ensure participatory approach to GGW activities.These include cooperatives, associations, unions, federations, confederations, foundations and foundations and unions.The CNOP and its member organisations, FENAFER, FENAJER, AOPP (at the national and regional levels) feature among the key professional agricultural organisations.Being included in co-design, to have farmers benefit GGW, knowledge shared.Enhanced, participatory, sustained implementation of GGW and lasting legacy. The success of the GWI essentially rests on producers as the contributors to restoration and the gate keepers of restored areas.The GTPs set up by ANACIM at the department level gather all relevant sectors concerned by the preparedness and monitoring of the winter cropping season to guide farmers with their decisionmaking.Expansion and use of the network to benefit farmers on the ground. National Platform on DV and Land Governance (COPIL DV/ GF)Ensures dialogue on land governance, the development of national consensus, the preparation of action plans for the implementation of the Voluntary Guidelines, and the monitoring and evaluation of land governance in Senegal.Application of provisions in decentralisation law.Platform aimed at addressing land tenure issues can be leveraged by GGW to address localised land tenure in the context of projects being implemented.Land tenure thinking and action tank in Senegal (CRAFS)CRAFS in 2017 called onto the President to finalise the land reform process.Application of provisions in decentralisation law.Multi-actors Task force for the promotion of agroecology in Senegal) (TaFAé)A group of actors, born from a desire to think and act together between farmers' organisations, researchers, NGOs, institutions in order to promote agroecology in Senegal.Greater uptake of agroecology.Platform can be used to engage actors to promote/ learn about agroecology fr GGW projects.Dynamique Nationale pour la Transition Agroécologique au Sénégal (DyTAES)Network that brings together umbrella organisations of producers, consumers, NGOs and Senegalese and international research institutions, networks of Senegalese and West African civil society organisations, a network of local elected officials.Greater uptake of agroecology.It plays a key role in fostering a transition towards agroecology. A good platform to engage on how to deepen agroecology uptake in context of GGW.National framework of the Alliance for Agroecology in West Africa (3AO)Coordination and information platform composed of farmers' organisations, research institutes/universities, international NGOs and social movements. It aims to promote and support an agroecological transition in West Africa.Greater uptake of agroe-cology.It seeks to facilitate inter-sectoral cooperation through a series of concrete and concerted actions in favour of agroecology, while providing greater visibility to the agroecological movement in West Africa.Green Climate Fund (GCF) Funds a number of regional projects of which Senegal is part, such as the Africa Integrated Climate Risk Management Programme, Inclusive Green Financing Initiative (IGREENFIN I), both projects focusing on the GGW.Direct support to GGW projects.Funding.Stakeholder & Contact Person Phone, Email, Website, Address Role Specific role of the stakeholder related to GGWGlobal Environment Fund (GEF) GEF funds multiple SLM and climate resilience projects including.Direct support to GGW projects.Funding.European Investment bank Funds several environmental projects in Senegal.Status of support/ interest in GGW unknown.Has been earmarked to fund projects for the GGW .African Development Bank (ADB)In 2021 pledged US$6.5 billion in sup-port of the GGW.Direct support to the GGW.Consultations were held within the framework of the support project for the implementation of the GGW on the initiative of the ADB (pillar III of the transition support facility).World Bank World Bank's IDA is the main funder of the livestock climate finance in Senegal. It finances activities of the Regional Support Project for Pastoralism in the Sahel to mitigate and adapt to climate change through sustainable landscape management, improved animal health and veterinary drug control, improved livestock value chains.Vision for the Sahel: mobilize financial resources to protect a fragile environment, and help the countries restore the living conditions of populations, particularly live-stock herders.Funding -In 2021 the World Bank announced it would invest US$5 billion to help restore African dry-lands.Was earmarked to fund projects for the GGW (discussion held in 2022). Will fund the \"100 million trees\" project 2024 and 2034 (cover the GGW area).Direct investment in GGW.Funding.European Union Supports several land restoration, agro-ecologically focused projects.Fostering an agroecological transition in the Sahel.Funding.Canadian (Quebec) Union des producteurs agricoles du Québec (UPADI)Has been working with the CNCR on SLM projects country wide.Funding & technical supports involved with on some SLM project in GGW.French Development Agency (AFD)Hélène JulienSupporting regional projects focused on the agroecological transition, resolving transboundary issues in the context of the GGW. + funds \"Programmeme d'Appui à la Transition Agroécologique\" (PATAE). The French Development Agency puts itself forward as a key strategic partner of the GGW Accelerator.Fundingenhancing AE dimension of projects. The GEF, through UNEP, has committed to supporting the APGMV Member States in establishing their baseline situation.Being part of GGW Alliance.Direct support to GGW, technical support.GGW project funding.Involved in several programmes related to climate change resilience and agricultural development.Being part of GGW Alliance.GGW project funding. Although not always strictly located within the GGW intervention zones, a number of transboundary programmes and projects exist to support the implementation of the GGW initiative at the regional level. The GGW in Senegal overlaps with a number of these global and regional restoration initiatives.In as much as an attempt was made here to classify projects according to a main theme, the reality is that many projects linked to the GGW have a multisectoral focus.The • The demarcation and signposting of eight classified forests in the region of Saint-Louis in order to avoid any encroachment by the populations and the agro-industrialists installed in the zone;• The construction of three nurseries, two in the Saint-Louis region and one in the Louga region;• The production of 800 000 seedlings of about 10 species;• Capacity building of actors grouped in the Intervillages Association;• The establishment of 40 000 ha of land degradation defences; and The project seeks to promote the social and occupational inclusion of youth in family farms and profitable ventures that will create income and decent, sustainable jobs in agro-silvo-pastoral and fisheries value chains. The project will benefit 150 000 rural young people. Among this group, 45 000 young people (50% of whom will be female) will be integrated into or receive support to start up a sustainable profitable activity in the agro-silvopastoral and fisheries value chains. The project will be implemented across four agroecological zones in Senegal: the Niayes region, the groundnut basin, the silvopastoral zone and lower and middle Casamance (not GGW areas). Recent research by ILRI found that, of the total amount of climate funding allocated for the livestock in Senegal between 2015 and 2022, only 39% was allocated to the livestock sector as the main target, the remaining of 61% was allocated to the agricultural sector, with a component for the livestock sector (2022b:46). Most of this was World Bank funding (95%) for phases 1 and 2 of the Regional Support Project for Pastoralism in the Sahel, and a small contribution from the French Development Agency (AFD) and the NGO Elevage Sans Frontières.Strengthening Agricultural Adaptation (SAGA) funded by the Government of Quebec and implemented by FAO and a range of partners on the ground focuses on reinforcing adaptation planning for food security and nutrition in Senegal which has increasingly suffered from climate change impacts.Through training and community-based participatory approaches, the project has reached more than 1300 beneficiaries and is implementing a broad range of initiatives from gender-sensitive Farmer Field Schools, market gardens, agroforestry and rainwater harvesting to beekeeping activities and the production of energy-efficient vegetable charcoal.The programme is proving catalytic in adopting a \"new\" approach to GGW projects, that are far more community based. The CNCR was recently involved in the conception of the project. 3. Specific strategies for building climate change resilience are refined and piloted in agropastoral systems and scaled up, including the optimal use of genetic resources as well as dryland farming in the three agroecological zones targeted by the project.The project was subject of a Good Practice Brief: Strengthening Climate Resilience through People-centred Approaches which highlights how the resilience of people to climate change was enhanced by the project by building the capacity of communities and women through two innovative, people-centred approaches, namely the Farmer Field Schools and Dimitra Clubs.The Down to Earth: Territorial Approach to Climate Change (TACC) is part of a partnership between the United Nations and sub-national governments for fostering climate friendly development at the subnational level. This partnership is a collaborative effort involving UNDP, UNEP and 8 associations of regions.CASSECS 2019-2023 -The CASSECS project is an ongoing project, funded by the EU, on the impact of livestock on climate change in CILSS countries.The overall objective of the project is to provide the CILSS countries with emission factors and reference data that will enable them to better establish the seasonal and annual carbon balance of agro-silvopastoral ecosystems and thus correctly fulfil their commitments in the implementation of the Paris Agreement. Among the project objectives are a focus on training and strengthening the skills of the technical services of the CILLS member states, local and international NGOs and livestock breeders' associations. Fair carbon: a research project still at the final stage of conception, to be funded by the EU and being led by IRD and involving the PPZS, with a possible start in 2023. The project will focus on assessing soil carbon in the GGW area.Senegal is signatory to the three Rio Conventions for biological diversity, climate change and the fight against desertification, as well as a number of other agreements and commitments reflected below:• The Bonn Challenge 5 .• The New York Declaration on Forests 6 .• The African Forest Landscape Restoration Initiative (AFR100) 7 launched in 2015.• The UNCCD Land Degradation Neutrality by 2030.• The African Resilient Landscapes Initiative 8 .• The UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021-2030) 9 .Senegal has also adhered to international conventions on the elimination of specific ozone depleting substances (for example the Vienna Convention, the Montreal Protocol and the Kigali Amendment) and has set national targets, and instruments to reach the elimination objectives. ","tokenCount":"9987"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0028337707.json b/data/part_2/0028337707.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2f8c0bdc3c030f30d5ee9573ccf27ed09277c565 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0028337707.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4193e5ad16b6006d1e1fcfaef5e4bf12","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/6d25e988-55e7-49ac-b10f-20865556c0eb/content","id":"-626354467"},"keywords":["alternative oxidase (AOX)","carbon balance","photosynthesis","respiration","yield potential"],"sieverID":"034493b2-7076-4260-bf50-a70e1bcee0e2","pagecount":"18","content":"The rate with which crop yields per hectare increase each year is plateauing at the same time that human population growth and other factors increase food demand. Increasing yield potential (Y p ) of crops is vital to address these challenges. In this review, we explore a component of Y p that has yet to be optimisedthat being improvements in the efficiency with which light energy is converted into biomass (ϵ c ) via modifications to CO 2 fixed per unit quantum of light (α), efficiency of respiratory ATP production (ϵ prod ) and efficiency of ATP use (ϵ use ). For α, targets include changes in photoprotective machinery, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase kinetics and photorespiratory pathways. There is also potential for ϵ prod to be increased via targeted changes to the expression of the alternative oxidase and mitochondrial uncoupling pathways. Similarly, there are possibilities to improve ϵ use via changes to the ATP costs of phloem loading, nutrient uptake, futile cycles and/or protein/membrane turnover. Recently developed high-throughput measurements of respiration can serve as a proxy for the cumulative energy cost of these processes. There are thus exciting opportunities to use our growing knowledge of factors influencing the efficiency of photosynthesis and respiration to create a step-change in yield potential of globally important crops.Anthropogenic carbon emissions since the Industrial Revolution have led to sustained global warming, with 2020 tying 2016 as the hottest year on record, at 1.25°C above preindustrial times (Voosen, 2021). How climate change affects our natural and managed systems is of major concern, particularly the effect of warming on major agricultural crop production. To keep pace with increasing crop demand for human and animal consumptionwhich will potentially double between 2010 and 2050 (van Dijk et al., 2021) and to minimise the demand for arable land, grain yields per hectare need to increase by 2.4% each year. Yet, for the period 1989-2008, actual annual increases fell markedly short of this figure, being 1.6%, 1.0%, 0.9% and 1.3% for maize, rice, wheat and soybean, respectively (Ray et al., 2013). Therefore, it is imperative that we improve major crop yields (Smith, 2013). This goal can be achieved through increasing both yield resilience in suboptimal 60 New Phytologist (2023) 237: 60-77 conditions (Munns & Gilliham, 2015;Rivero et al., 2022) and yield potential, discussed herein.To date, increases in crop yields have been driven by Green Revolution cultivarsthat lent themselves to more intensive irrigation, fertilisation and mechanisationand continued selective breeding (Tilman, 1998;Crespo-Herrera et al., 2018). These strategies doubled wheat yield and tripled that of maize between 1961 and 2000outcomes that were achieved with only a 30% increase in cultivated land area (World Bank, 2007;Hazell, 2009). Global wheat production grew from 222 Mt in 1961 to 585 Mt in 2000 and then to 735 Mt as of 2018. However, in recent years, yield per hectare has plateaued and further investment in the current strategies may be ineffective at further boosting yield (Tester & Langridge, 2010;Mózner et al., 2012;Iizumi et al., 2017). To avoid farming more land and using more fertilisers, it is essential that new pathways are found to boost crop yields. Improving yield potential (Y p ) is one such opportunity.Breaking Y p into components allows assessment of targeted multiplicative improvements. Y p is the product of several underlying components:where Q is the cumulative incident solar radiation (MJ m −2 ) throughout the growing season; ϵ p is the partitioning efficiency (commonly referred to as harvest index), the proportion of biomass allocated to harvested product; ϵ i is the efficiency with which the plant intercepts/absorbs radiation; and ϵ c is the efficiency with which the intercepted radiation is converted into biomass (Monteith, 1977;Long et al., 2015) (see Box 1 for a mathematical expansion of ϵ c , and Fig. 1 for examples of factors that influence each underlying component of Y p ). In theory, an increase in any of these factors would increase overall Y p . However, not every term of the equation holds promise for a significant improvement in future years (Loomis & Amthor, 1999). Both ϵ p and ϵ i have improved greatly since the Green Revolution through selective breeding, approaching 0.6 and 0.8-0.9, respectively (Zhu et al., 2010). Increasing crop yields throughout the second half of the 20 th century came with a concomitant increase in harvest index, attributable to biomass allocation patterns and dwarf genes that resulted in shorter stems that could support more grain (Sinclair, 1998). Meanwhile, because higher ϵ i increases the amount of incident solar radiation available for photosynthesis, improvements in canopy architecture and responses to light have been targets for selection. In many field-grown crops, plants with leaves perpendicular to incoming light will intercept most of the solar radiation at the uppermost layer of the canopy, shading lower levels and preventing them from achieving light-saturated levels of photosynthesis (Campbell & Ogren, 1990;Ort & Long, 2003). Structuring canopies such that leaves higher in the canopy arrange themselves at steeper angles allows for deeper penetration of solar radiation, potentially doubling ϵ i at peak irradiance or low latitudes. Through selective breeding during the Green Revolution, ϵ i was increased through reductions in plant stature and lodging.By comparison, there are still many untapped opportunities for improvements in the underlying factors that influence the efficiency with which solar radiation is converted into biomass (i.e. ϵ c ). Currently, the maximum observed value of ϵ c lies at c. 0.024, yet the ϵ c for C 3 crops has a theoretical maximum efficiency of 0.046-0.051 (Monteith, 1977;Long et al., 2006;Zhu et al., 2010). Given this gap, ϵ c values could be strategically targeted as they provide one of the best options for future improvement (Fig. 2). To enable this, opportunities to increase the efficiency of the biochemical processes underpinning ϵ c urgently need to be identified and prioritised.Steps to improve the efficiency of net photosynthetic CO 2 fixation One way of improving ϵ c is to increase the efficiency of photosynthesis (Eqn B3). But how might this be achieved? Ultimately, improvements are needed in the ability of plants to convert absorbed light energy into products (ATP and NADPH) needed to drive CO 2 fixation by ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/ oxygenase (Rubisco) and in minimising carbon loss through processes such as photorespiration, while protecting the system from photoinhibition. Here, we discuss attributes that influence the efficiency of photosynthesis and strategies being employed to improve net photosynthesis.The variable nature of light availability across space and time in the plant canopy requires consideration of biochemical responses to these fluctuations. Incoming solar radiation above saturating rates can cause photooxidative damage to light-harvesting complexes (Havaux & Niyogi, 1999;Baroli & Niyogi, 2000). Photoprotective mechanisms can decrease the quantum yield of photosystem II, accounting for c. 15% decrease in daily canopy carbon uptake, and even higher values under stress conditions (Long et al., 1994;Zhu et al., 2004). Photosynthetic induction, the ramp-up of photosynthetic activity after exposure to light, can delay a leaf from reaching optimal photosynthetic rates under given conditions on the scale of minutes (Retkute et al., 2015;Soleh et al., 2017). Modulating these responses could improve net photosynthetic performance in certain situations (Murchie & Niyogi, 2011). The issue of induction is related to canopy structure because lower canopy layers are more reliant on intermittent light interception for photosynthesis. For example, total canopy photosynthesis could increase up to 17% with increased light penetration to the lower canopy in rice (Burgess et al., 2016). Additionally, the delay of photosynthetic induction ramping up to full capacity can cause a > 20% loss of potential carbon assimilation in wheat (Taylor & Long, 2017), which could potentially be ameliorated through overexpression or amino acid substitutions in Rubisco activase (Yamori et al., 2012;Carmo-Silva & Salvucci, 2013). Because leaf N is not necessarily distributed to maximise photosynthesis, optimising nitrogen distribution throughout the canopy is another strategy for increased photosynthesis, particularly at key growth stages (Johnson et al., 2010;Moreau et al., 2012). Potential strategies to improve induction of photosynthesis include speeding up the rate at which proteins are activated in the photosynthetic electron transport system, increasing carbon fixation capacity via increases in concentrations in Rubisco and Rubisco activase, and improving CO 2 supply via increases in stomatal and mesophyll conductance (Yamori, 2021). Increasing nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) relaxation under fluctuating light conditions could also be beneficial, in order to increase the efficiency of light energy use under light-limiting conditions (Yamori, 2021). A recent example is the study by De Souza et al. (2022) for soybean; they reported that the overexpression of genes linked to NPQ relaxation (AtVDE, AtPsbS and AtZEP) improved photosynthetic efficiency of soybean under fluctuating light over 2 yr in field trials. Yield may also be improved, as shown by the 24% higher soybean yields of five independent transgenic lines at the Urbana site in 2020. While further work is needed across multiple sites and years, the work of De Souza et al. (2022) does highlight opportunities to improve yield potential via targeting photosynthetic properties such as NPQ relaxation.Another approach to improve photosynthesis is via targeting the biochemical properties of Rubisco. As a central protein in the Calvin cycle, Rubisco's biochemical properties play a large role in defining photosynthetic performance. Variations in Rubisco's Currently, the maximum observed value of ϵ c lies c. 0.024 (Monteith, 1977). Yet, the ϵ c for C 3 crops has a theoretical efficiency of 0.046-0.051 (Long et al., 2006;Zhu et al., 2010). With current ϵ c values being only half of their theoretical maximum, there is clearly scope for improvement. Here, improvements in the efficiency of biochemical processes underpinning ϵ c are urgently needed. To understand ways of improving ϵ c , we can mathematically consider which factors contribute to variation in ϵ c . One way of achieving this is to define ϵ c according to:where ϵ c (and thus the biomass produced per joule of light absorbed) is the product of how much CO 2 is fixed by photosynthesis per joule of light, multiplied by the amount of plant mass per unit of CO 2 fixed by photosynthesis. Eqn B2 shows that ϵ c could be improved through targeting aspects of photosynthetic biochemistry to improve the amount of CO 2 fixed per unit quantum of light. Put another way:It also shows that ϵ c can be improved via changes in the efficiency with which plants accumulate biomass per unit of CO 2 fixed:Bringing Eqns B3 and B4 together, we see that ϵ c is related to α and ϵ biosynthesis according to:where ϵ biosynthesis is dependent on the efficiency of ATP production (hereon termed ϵ prod ; i.e. how much substrate must be consumed for a certain ATP yield) and the efficiency of ATP use (ϵ use ), with the latter being the ATP yield necessary to drive processes of biosynthesis, transport and cellular maintenance. Bringing these factors together, we see that:and therefore:These equations thus show that improvements in ϵ c could be achieved through α, ϵ prod and ϵ use . In subsequent sections, we discuss strategies available for improvement in these components of ϵ c .New structure, catalytic activity and interactions with other proteins (such as Rubisco activase) present both opportunities and limitations for engineering improvements in photosynthesis (Whitney et al., 2011;Conlan & Whitney, 2018). Collaborations such as the Realizing Increased Photosynthetic Efficiency project (https://ripe. illinois.edu/) highlight the role of strategies such as introducing novel Rubisco types (Prins et al., 2016), selecting for shorter photosynthetic induction (Acevedo-Siaca et al., 2020) and improving stomatal CO 2 response of mesophyll conductance of CO 2 (Bailey-Serres et al., 2019). Hyperspectral reflectance has also shown promising correlations to related traits, such as the maximum catalytic activity of Rubisco (V cmax ) and maximum rate of photosynthetic electron transport (J max ) (Silva-Perez et al., 2018;Fu et al., 2020). Focusing on such traits, and using emerging highthroughput, nondestructive methods of quantifying photosynthetic traits, provides opportunities to breed for increased α and through it, improve ϵ c .Another route to improving the efficiency of net photosynthesis is via modifications to photorespirationthe pathway through which the oxygenation reaction by Rubisco consumes RuBP to form 3-Fig. 1 Logic flow of improvements to the carbon economy of plants in order to increase yield potential. Minimising the ratio of respiration to either photosynthesis (R : P) or growth (R : RGR) increases the amount of photo assimilate available for yield (yellow). This goal can be achieved in two ways (green): by shrinking the numerator (decreased mitochondrial CO 2 loss) or by increasing the denominator (more CO 2 uptake). To date, increases in yield potential have been in part due to improvements in ϵ i (violet). Further improvements will require improving ϵ c through modifying the photorespiratory pathway (α; orange), increased ϵ prod (blue) or increased ϵ use (red). AOX, alternative oxidase; COX, cytochrome c oxidase; SWEET, Sugars Will Eventually be Exported Transporter; UQ, ubiquinone pool.Fig. 2 Theoretical efficiencies of yield potential factors. Yield potential can be improved by increasing any of its factors -ϵ i , ϵ c and ϵ p . However, only ϵ c shows appreciable difference between its observed and theoretical efficiency and therefore stands as the best target for improvement. Energy remaining after ϵ c processes is in the form of biomass, and a doubling would hypothetically flow downstream and double energy remaining during ϵ p , that is yield. Q, incoming solar radiation for growing season.Ó 2022 The Authors New Phytologist Ó 2022 New Phytologist Foundation.New Phytologist (2023) 237: 60-77 www.newphytologist.comPGA and 2-phosphoglycolate (2PG), the latter being converted to glycolate. The 2PG inhibits triose-phosphate isomerase and disrupts the Calvin cycle, emphasising the need not only to minimise Rubisco oxygenation, but also to efficiently metabolise 2PG once produced. This is achieved, in part, via the export of glycolate to the peroxisome where it is converted to glyoxylate and then glycine (resulting in the release of H 2 O 2 ), with glycine being exported to mitochondria where it is decarboxylated by glycine decarboxylase (GDC) to yield serine, NH 3 , NAD(H) and CO 2 .Together, these reactions mean that photorespiration reduces the efficiency of net photosynthesis (and thus α and ϵ c ). Because of this, minimising Rubisco oxygenation and associated rates of photorespiratory CO 2 release are potential targets for improving yield potential. Importantly, any strategy to modify photorespiration needs to regulate the production and metabolism of toxic intermediates, the loss of nitrogen as volatile NH 3 , and also consider the current role of photorespiration in wider amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism (Novitskaya et al., 2002;Abadie & Tcherkez, 2019).From a carbon metabolism perspective, photorespiration represents an energetically expensive process, either as an opportunity cost during Rubisco oxygenation (every O 2 bound to Rubisco represents a potential CO 2 that did not bind), or as CO 2 release during glycine decarboxylation. Rubisco oxygenation will be influenced by the relative specificity of Rubisco (S c/o ), leaf temperature and the intercellular and intracellular concentrations of CO 2 (Parry et al., 2013), with the subsequent rate of photorespiratory CO 2 release varying depending on which metabolic intermediates are shuttled to other pathways (Peterhansel et al., 2010;Busch, 2020). Reassimilation of photorespiratory CO 2 by Rubisco will also influence the extent to which photorespiration reduces α and ϵ c (Sage & Sage, 2009).Because of its potential to reduce the efficiency of net photosynthesis, many researchers have investigated the effect of mutations to different points in the photorespiratory pathway over the past 30 yr. These studies have revealed a wide range of 'photorespiratory phenotypes' that vary depending on the site of disruption to photorespiratory pathway and the environmental conditions in which plants are grown (e.g. see table 2 in Timm & Bauwe (2013) for a list of mutants and associated phenotypes). In many cases, knockout of key steps in the photorespiratory pathway is deleterious and potentially lethal. For example, in Arabidopsis thaliana, the most severe phenotypes show conditional lethality in GDC double knockout mutants (gldp1 × gldp2) and serine hydroxymethyltransferase double knockout mutants (shm1 × sh-m2) (Engel et al., 2007(Engel et al., , 2011)). Other deletions result in a milder photorespiratory phenotype because of functional redundancy with other members in the gene family (Timm & Bauwe, 2013) and/or because of the plasticity of phenotypic response in photorespiratory mutants (Peterhansel et al., 2013;Walker et al., 2016). In any case, the available mutant studies highlight that fully knocking out the entire photorespiratory pathway is not a viable strategy and that photorespiratory modifications (to reduce photorespiratory CO 2 release) must consider reducing flux through the pathway, while regulating production and metabolism of toxic intermediates.A range of studies provide examples of how modifications of photorespiration can increase biomass production (see Fig. 3), including: increasing CO 2 concentration around Rubisco (to reduce the rate of oxygenation) based on the modelled introduction of cyanobacterial carboxysomes; changing associations between chloroplasts and mitochondria; and engineering photorespiratory bypasses (Sage & Sage, 2009;Price et al., 2013;Xin et al., 2015;Betti et al., 2016;Batista-Silva et al., 2020). One example is the expression of CO 2 permeable aquaporins to improve membrane CO 2 conductance (Groszmann et al., 2017;Zhao et al., 2017;Ermakova et al., 2021) and reabsorb emitted CO 2 in the chloroplast. Another example of the latter is recent work by South et al. (2019) who detail three alternative photorespiratory pathways (APs) in Nicotiana tabacum, two of which led to increased biomass and one which increased light-use efficiency. AP1 plants (with Escherichia coli glycolate oxidase genes targeted to the chloroplast) exhibited a 13% increase in plant dry mass. AP3 plants (with replaced malate synthase and glycolate oxidase) exhibited an 18% increase in the absence of an RNAi construct that reduced PLGG1 expression and 24% biomass increase with the RNAi constructas well as increased glyoxylate and pyruvate, increased photosynthetic rate, increased chloroplastic CO 2 concentration and decreased serine and glycerate. These findings highlight the potential and viability of modifications to the photorespiratory pathway to improve plant growth.Net photosynthesis determines the upper bounds of the plant carbon budget; however, understanding the fate of fixed carbon is just as important to ultimately improving Y p . Photoassimilate from the Calvin cycle is stored or exported to sink tissues, where it can be respired to produce ATP, carbon skeletons and reductants. Between 30 and 60% of daily fixed carbon ends up being respired (Amthor et al., 2019). The ultimate goal is to improve the efficiency of ATP synthesis and use, reducing the proportion of daily fixed carbon that is respired and improving yield through enhanced ϵ c . This could be accomplished through improvements in ϵ biosynthesis (Eqns B4 and B6). Knowing that respiration is a key component in determining available carbon for growth in a plant's carbon budget, we first explore the components of ϵ biosynthesis (i.e. processes that influence the efficiency of ATP production and consumption).To improve ϵ biosynthesis , one option is to consider ϵ prodthe efficiency with which ATP and other respiratory products are made (Eqn B7). During oxidative phosphorylation, high-energy electrons generated during glycolysis and from the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle are transported through a series of complexes along the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) to the terminal electron acceptor, oxygen. The flow of electrons through Complexes I (NAD(H) dehydrogenase), III (cytochrome bc 1 complex) and IV (cytochrome c oxidase, COX) is coupled to the pumping of protons across the IMM to create the electrochemical gradient that drives generation of ATP by Complex V (ATP synthase). Importantly, the plant IMM also contains rotenone-resistant dehydrogenases (alternative DHs) that reduce the ubiquinone pool without utilising Complex I (Rasmusson et al., 2004) and the cyanideresistant alternative oxidase (AOX) that diverts the flow of electrons from the ubiquinone pool directly to O 2 (McIntosh, 1994;Vanlerberghe & McIntosh, 1997;Berthold et al., 2000). The alternative DHs and AOX pathway reduce the efficiency of ATP production per mol substrate because electrons bypass either Complex I, or both Complex III/IV, respectively, resulting in a decrease in the number of protons pumped across the membrane such that the amount of ATP per unit of CO 2 released and/or O 2 consumed decreases. Similarly, dissipation of the electrochemical gradient also occurs when protons are transported through the IMM-located uncoupling proteins (UCPs) or mechanosensitive ion channels and results in reduced ATP yield, with energy being dissipated as heat (Sweetlove et al., 2006;Lee et al., 2016). Because of this, ϵ prod has the potential to be inversely related to engagement of the AOX pathway and/or other nonphosphorylating/uncoupling pathways (Fig. 4). While we lack examples of where engagement of these pathways are linked to changes in ϵ prod , low activity of them couldin theorycontribute to increased ϵ prod and ultimately Y p .One challenge for improving ϵ prod through targeting the AOX and/or other nonphosphorylating/uncoupling pathways is the fact that nonphosphorylating and uncoupling pathways broadly increase stress resistance. For example, AOX transcripts increase under stressed conditions such as the presence of inhibitors of mitochondrial electron transport chain (Saisho et al., 1997;Polidoros et al., 2005), chilling temperatures (Djajanegara et al., 2002) and oxidative stress (Yukioka et al., 1998). Loss of AOX makes plants susceptible to stress (Giraud et al., 2008;Demircan et al., 2020), and overexpression can improve plant stress tolerance (Dahal et al., 2015;Gong et al., 2020). Changes in UCP and NDH expression have similar effects (Taylor et al., 2005;Arcuri et al., 2021). Increases in the abundance of nonphosphorylating and uncoupling pathways enable plants to maintain flux through glycolysis and the TCA cycle under conditions of low ATP demand (i.e. enabling flexibility in the ATP yield and depending on demand). This flexibility comes with the trade-off of decreased efficiency in ATP production, and a decrease in ϵ prod means that more assimilated carbon must be consumed to produce ATP. However, suboptimal ATP yield is counteracted by increased stress tolerance and blunt excision of these pathways may do more harm than good, as the aforementioned mutant phenotypes show.Assuming in specific scenarios that changes in ϵ prod could help increase ϵ biosynthesis , how might future studies incorporate screens for genotypic variability in ϵ prod into breeding strategies? One approach is to quantify the relative engagement of these pathways in vivo. In the case of terminal oxidases, COX and AOX exhibit differential isotope discrimination when consuming O 2 (Guy et al., 1987;Cheah et al., 2014). When placed in a closed system, the ratios of 16 O and 18 O change through time; when coupled to measurements of overall O 2 uptake, rates of COX and AOX can be calculated. While such an approach could be used to screen divergent genotypes of crops, the method is currently low throughput and requires sustained use of high-sensitivity mass spectrometers; thus, as currently available, the oxygen isotope discrimination method is unlikely to provide the rapid screening required by the crop breeding industry. Similarly, we lack methods to rapidly screen for variability in in vivo proton translocation via uncoupling pathways or the use of alternative NDHs. Thus, new approaches will need to be developed that enable in vivo rates through any or all of these alternative pathways in high-throughput measurements as part of screens of diverse germplasm. An alternative approach could be to employ a synthetic biology approach to modify their engagement. For example, Amthor et al. (2019) suggested engineering a light-specific AOX to replace constitutive expression, minimising AOX flux in the dark and improving ϵ prod . A dual-track approachusing screens of diversity panels and a synthetic biology approachwould allow us to take advantage of natural variation in engagement of alternative pathways and engineered variation. Finally, further efforts need to be made to adapt the genetically-encoded biosensors developed for live monitoring of photosynthetic redox and energy status in chloroplasts (Müller-Schüssele et al., 2021) to the monitoring of respiratory energetics in mitochondria.Improvements to ϵ biosynthesis can also be accomplished through changes to the efficiency by which respiratory energy is used (i.e.ϵ use ) for biosynthetic, maintenance and active transport. Cellular respiration not only provides the energy required for metabolic reactions, but also creates the carbon skeletons necessary for biosynthesis and regulates the cellular redox environment in which these reactions to take place (Plaxton & Podestá, 2006;Millar et al., 2011;O'Leary et al., 2019). Changes in the efficiency of processes that use products of respiration can thus influence ϵ use , with consequences for ϵ biosynthesis , ϵ c and Y p .Biosynthesis costs of plant tissues are generally invariant Could ϵ use be improved via screening for variation in the energy costs of synthesising new tissues? The energy demand associated with biosynthesis depends on two factors: (1) the ATP costs of making individual chemical constituents; and (2) the relative abundance of individual chemicals in plant tissues (De Vries et al., 1983;Lambers & Rychter, 1989). Beyond acquisition (described later), minerals have no construction cost, and organic acids, total nonstructural carbon and total structural carbon are relatively cheap to produce (0.91, 1.09 and 1.22 g glucose g −1 dry mass, respectively). Meanwhile, the costs of synthesis are higher for lignin, protein, soluble phenolics and lipids (2.12, 2.48, 2.60 and 3.03 g glucose g −1 , respectively), and key components of energy organelles. Theoretically, differences in the chemical makeup of different tissues could mean that some tissues are cheaper to produce than others. However, in studies that have quantified the construction costs of plant tissues in a range of contrasting plant species, relatively minor differences have been observed. For example, Poorter & Villar (1994) found only small differences in the construction costs for different functional types: a 6% difference between herbaceous and woody plants (1.45 to 1.54 g glucose g −1 , respectively) and a 4% difference between deciduous angiosperms and evergreens (1.52 and 1.58 g glucose g −1 , respectively). Additionally, environmental-limiting conditions ((CO 2 ), light and nutrients) have a minimal impact (≤10%) on construction costs. Underpinning the uniformity of construction costs is the fact that there are often trade-offs in the abundance of energetically expensive compounds. For example, fast-growing species are protein-rich, whereas slow-growing species contain high concentrations of lignin, with both compounds being energetically expensive to construct (Poorter & Villar, 1994), with there being a general trade-off between inexpensive and expensive constituents in both slow-and fast-growing species (Lambers et al., 2008). Given these observations, targeting the efficiency of biosynthesis is unlikely to be the best strategy for improving ϵ use . Rather, improvements are likely to come through a focus on the efficiency with which respiratory energy is used by processes of cellular maintenance and/or ion transport.Improvements through targeting the energy costs of maintenance processes Perhaps of greater significance in determining whether a particular plant has low or high ϵ use are the energy costs associated with maintenance of mature tissues (e.g. protein turnover and maintenance of solute gradients across membranes), which can consume 30-60% of daily fixed carbon (Penning de Vries, 1975;Amthor, 2000), with high costs being associated with slow growth rates (Lambers et al., 2008). More recently, Amthor et al. (2019) outlined the opportunity to reduce energy costs of maintenance processes, including decreasing protein and membrane turnover, relocating and/or rescheduling metabolic activities, suppressing futile cycles in metabolism and reducing ion transport costs. As such, there is potential for ϵ use to be improved through screening for variation in the energy costs of these processes and/or genetic manipulation of the underlying components of each process (Jacoby et al., 2016;Amthor et al., 2019).Plants employ a diverse assortment of proteins for daily growth, metabolism and function, as well as in response to dynamic stimuli. The plant proteome is responsive to abiotic and developmental factors as well as carbon and nitrogen economy (Kosová et al., 2011). Total protein content in a plant is not constant and changes in response to environmental factors such as salinity (Doganlar et al., 2010;Jouyban, 2012), drought (Akhzari & Pessarakli, 2016) and heat stress (Giri et al., 2017) to name a few. Protein abundance depends on the rate of protein synthesis (k s ) and degradation (k d ) (Li et al., 2017;Ross et al., 2021). As Li et al. (2017) note, these two processes are often combined to loosely define protein turnover, the process by which degradation of existing proteins and replacement with newly synthesised proteins modify the proteome. For a given time period, Ross et al. (2021) define total protein produced simply as the integral of k s , whereas total protein degraded is expressed as an exponential decay function, with k d as the rate constant. By relating protein abundance to rates, the authors find that k d controls turnover under steady-state conditions, including after changes in k s , as only k d controls protein half-lives (see Ross et al., 2021).What do we know about the relationship between protein turnover and its associated ATP costs? Reflecting the factors mentioned earlier, it is clear that plants have evolved a complex system to regulate protein synthesis and degradation, allowing metabolism to dynamically adjust to changes in the type and abundance of proteins needed in different environments and growth stages (Vierstra, 2009;Marshall & Vierstra, 2018). Protein synthesis can be controlled at the transcriptional, posttranscriptional and translational levels, whereas degradation is dependent on post-translational regulation related to protein location and function, local environment and protein-protein interactions (Hinkson & Elias, 2011;Nelson & Millar, 2015;Huang et al., 2020). The balance between synthesis and degradation dictates maintenance costs of protein turnover, either through differences in specific ATP cost of turnover or the absolute amount of turnover occurring.While protein turnover can help plants adjust to new environments, it is energetically expensive. Each day, c. 6% of all proteins are replaced, with 6-10 mol ATP being consumed per mol peptide bonds undergoing turnover and 0.9-1.6 CO 2 per amino acid (Noguchi et al., 2001;Nelson et al., 2014;Ishihara et al., 2015). Bouma et al. (1994) estimated that protein turnover in bean leaves accounted for 17-21% of darkened mature leaf respiration (c. 2.3 nmol CO 2 g −1 s −1 ). In a review of previous research, Noguchi et al. (2001) reported that protein turnover consumes 3.5-60% of total ATP produced. In their own experiment, Noguchi et al. (2001) found protein turnover consumed 15.9-23.8% and 40.8-61.3% of total ATP produced in shaded and sunlit leaves, respectively. Quigg & Beardall (2003) reported that the proportion of maintenance respiration is attributable to protein turnover in higher plants, ranging from Dactylis glomerata roots (7%) to Hordeum vulgare full-grown leaves (30-60%). In wheat, protein turnover consumes approximately a third of total respiratory energy (Zagda ńska, 1995). In Arabidopsis, 25-40% of ATP is used for protein turnover, depending on the age and growth rate of leaves, and this overall cost has been broken down to specific costs of maintaining different kinds of cellular organelles, metabolic pathways and enzymes (Li et al., 2017). Specific proteins also play disproportionately large roles in turnover costs. For example, thiazole synthase (THI4) turnover can account for 2-10% of total maintenance respiration (Amthor et al., 2019). Thus, while there is clearly considerable variability in the estimated ATP costs associated with protein turnover, what is clear is that reducing the costs of turnover could be a target for improving ϵ use , particularly when designing plants for future, warmer climates. This is because turnover costs are likely to increase under conditions of environmental stress (e.g. heat, salinity and hypoxia) that accelerate the turnover of proteins, thereby consuming more of the ATP budget (Hachiya et al., 2007;Edwards et al., 2012).Bearing in mind the goal of maximising ϵ use , are there correlations between whole-plant growth and protein turnover? In Arabidopsis, larger (higher growth rate and rosette biomass) accessions reduced ribosome abundance at night, whereas smaller accessions maintained end-of-day levels of ribosomes (Ishihara , 2017). Smaller accessions also had rates of protein synthesis up to 30% higher than the estimated rate required for growth, and up to 25% of the observed difference in relative growth rate could be tied to increased ATP costs of protein turnover. Gibon et al. (2009) found a tight correlation between growth, starch metabolism and protein content in Arabidopsis grown under different photoperiods, although they observed protein amount, not turnover rate. There are currently few studies in this space, but it should be considered a priority for further study, considering the substantial proportion of ATP use devoted to protein turnover.Other substantive energy demands are phospholipid membrane turnover (c. 0.7 nmol CO 2 g −1 s −1 ) (Penning de Vries, 1975) and maintenance of ion gradients within cells; for the latter, Penning de Vries (1975) estimated that the total cost of maintaining intracellular ion gradients was c. 4.6 nmol CO 2 g −1 s −1 in some leaves, that is over 50% of respiratory rate. Lipids (a large part of membrane composition) are expensive to produce, costing nearly 3 g of glucose to produce 1 g of lipid (De Vries et al., 1974) To our knowledge, little work exists on the specific construction costs or turnover rates of plant membranes. Prior studies show that wholeplant cell membranes can be fully turned over in 200 min (Warren & Glick, 1968;Steer, 1988). However, Hao & Maxfield (2000) found membrane turnover rates as low as 5-10 min in Chinese hamster ovarian cells. This large difference between very distinct cell types suggests more work remains to address gaps in how membrane turnover is supported by maintenance respiration. Similarly, considering protein turnover, improved measurement techniques will allow for fine-resolution, context-specific descriptions of synthesis and degradation rates, k s and k d , respectively (Nelson et al., 2014;Ross et al., 2021), across the multitude of subcellular and ambient environments experienced, allowing greater specificity of turnover characterisation. Variation in energy demands associated with maintenance can, therefore, have a substantive impact on ϵ use of leaves. From the context of increasing ϵ use and ultimately Y p , minimising the energy costs associated with protein turnover, while maintaining adequate function, would present an opportunity to decrease the maintenance respiration costs incurred (Amthor et al., 2019).Lowering the energy costs of phloem loading A further factor that influences the demand for respiratory ATP is nocturnal carbohydrate export from mature leaves. Once synthesised in photosynthetic source leaves, sucrose (Suc), the main assimilate in most seed plants, needs to be loaded into the phloem for translocation towards nonphotosynthetic sink organs where Suc is unloaded. This source-to-sink allocation of assimilate plays critical roles in determining how biomass is translated into crop yield (Ruan, 2014;Fernie et al., 2020). Opportunities exist to increase source-to-sink phloem translocation efficiency with no or little additional ATP cost as elaborated later.In most species, phloem loading takes place either via the apoplast across plasma membranes or via the symplast through plasmodesmata (PD) at the interface of phloem parenchyma and the companion cell-sieve element (CC-SE) complex in developed leaves. The latter pathway also includes Suc moving from mesophyll and bundle sheath cells through PD into specialised CCs called intermediary cells, where Suc is synthesised into a raffinose family oligosaccharide for loading into the SE, the socalled polymer trap model. This pathway has been observed in Cucurbita genus and some trees (Fu et al., 2011;Zhang & Turgeon, 2018). In apoplasmic phloem loading, the uptake of Suc into CCs is typically mediated by H + -Suc symporters energised by plasma membrane-bound ATPase, while efflux of Suc from phloem parenchyma is facilitated by the energy-independent clade III Sugars will Eventually be Exported transporter (SWEET). Knockout of clade III SWEETs significantly reduced phloem loading, leading to a severe growth phenotype in a range of species such as Arabidopsis (Chen et al., 2012) and maize (Bezrutczyk et al., 2018). These findings indicate a major role of SWEETs in controlling Suc efflux for subsequent uptake into the CC-SE. It is therefore plausible that enhancing Suc efflux by increasing clade III SWEET expression or activity could improve phloem loading of Suc with no direct energy cost (and thus improve ϵ use ).In parallel to apoplasmic loading, Suc may also be loaded into CC-SE symplasmically via PD (Braun et al., 2014;Bezrutczyk et al., 2018). In this case, phloem loading may be improved through increasing PD conductance by modifying sterol homeostasis or callose turnover or other PD-associated proteins (Zhang et al., 2017;Fernie et al., 2020). To this end, β-1,3 glucan synthase and β-1,3 glucanase are the two enzymes synthesising and degrading callose, respectively (Ruan, 2007;Zhang et al., 2017). Thus, the knockout of η-1,3 glucan synthase could block callose synthesis at the PD neck region, while overexpressing β-1,3 glucanase could degrade callose at the PD neck region. Such changes would have the effect of 'opening up' or increasing PD conductance for symplasmic loading (potentially increasing ϵ use ).The SWEETs also play an important role in unloading of Suc into sinks. Interestingly, clade III SWEETs could be bound and inactivated by SP6A, a homologue of FT and phloem-mobile tuberigen in potato tubers, which switches the apoplasmic unloading route into symplasmic unloading, triggering tubulisation (Abelenda et al., 2019). This shows potential to optimise phloem unloading for yield gain such as tuber formation via manipulating SWEET activity. On the contrary, PD appears to impose major restrictions on the delivery of assimilates to meristematic sinks such as shoot or root apex and ovules (Ruan, 2012). In this context, computational modelling has identified inefficient delivery of carbon as a cause of floral and seed abortion on the secondary and tertiary branches of rice panicles (Seki et al., 2015), likely due to low PD conductance in those highorder branches (Fernie et al., 2020). Collectively, the above analyses indicate potential scope and avenues for improving phloem loading and unloading for growth and yield gain in an energy-efficient manner, with positive implications for ϵ use .Reducing the energy costs associated with root nutrient uptake Uptake of nutrients from the soil into roots is another major energy cost, with 50-60% of root respiratory ATP being used to support ion uptake (Poorter et al., 1991). Importantly, the specific energy costs of ion uptake differ among species adapted to contrasting environments, with more respiratory ATP being needed to take up a given amount of nitrate in inherently slow- growing species than their fast-growing counterparts, when plants are provided with high nutrient supply (Poorter et al., 1991). The differences in the specific costs of ion uptake reflect the fact that: (1) there is an efflux of ions (e.g. nitrate) from roots, resulting in a reduction in the net rate of ion uptake; and (2) the extent of efflux is relatively greater in inherently slow-growing species than in fastgrowing species (Scheurwater et al., 1998(Scheurwater et al., , 1999)). Such differences suggest that we may be able to increase ϵ use via understanding the mechanistic basis for these differences.Roots collect water and nutrients from the surrounding soil matrix, not only through bulk flow passive transport but also through active transport facilitated by transporter proteins. Active transport impacts ϵ use by using ATP to transport nutrients across membranes, against a concentration gradient, to be assimilated by roots or transported to shoots (Xu et al., 2012). In the case of nitrate, this movement is undertaken by nitrate transporter 1 (NRT1)/peptide transporter gene superfamily (NPF) that encodes transporters throughout the plant that allow its movement from root to shoot and ultimately nitrate reduction (Campbell, 1999;Plett et al., 2010;Zhang et al., 2020). However, as outlined earlier, nitrogen efflux from roots is common (Segonzac et al., 2007;Xu et al., 2012) and can contribute to high rates of respiration in slower growing plants as the ratio of nitrate influx to net nitrate uptake increases (Scheurwater et al., 1998). Ideally, ϵ use would be maximised through maintaining high rates of net nitrate uptake and assimilation per ATP used. This could be achieved through increased influx, decreased efflux or more rapid translocation to the shoot. Strategies including suppressed expression of nitrate efflux transporters such as NAXT1 (Segonzac et al., 2007) or other anion channels (Teakle & Tyerman, 2010;Wege et al., 2017), targeted overexpression of influx transporters with high NO À 3 selectivity (Fan et al., 2016), increasing structural barriers to impede leakage in roots such as suberised hypodermal or endodermal layers (Barberon, 2017) and relocation of nitrate assimilation from roots to shoots have been proposed to increase biomass gains from lower respiration rates (Amthor et al., 2019). Microbiome interactions, for example with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, also aid with nutrient uptake and growth promotion (Pascale et al., 2020). Griffiths et al. (2021) studied hydroponically-grown Zea mays and found genotypic variation in specific root ion uptake rates, which were heritable and positively correlated with specific root respiration rates. Variation between two rice subspecies in their NRT1.1B transporter showed increased nitrate uptake and transport to shoots, as well as upregulation expression of root and shoot nitrate reductase genes (Hu et al., 2015). As Griffiths & York (2020) point out, the extent of genetic variation in transporter traits such as energy costs of active transport is not yet well-characterised. Thus, variations in uptake kinetics exist and present another target for improved ϵ use .The earlier sections have shown that there is potential for variability in both ϵ prod and ϵ use to occur in nature, with consequences for ϵ biosynthesis and ϵ c . Amthor et al. (2019) estimated that a 10% reduction in the energy costs of maintenance could increase biomass accumulation by 6%, and a 20% maintenance respiration reduction could lead to gains up to 14%. This provides a rationale for screening genotypic variability in ϵ prod and/or ϵ use and therefore possibly identifying genotypes with improved yield. However, to be useful, such an approach needs an array of high-throughput methods capable of large-scale phenotyping of ϵ prod (e.g. rapid assays of nonphosphorylating or uncoupling pathway engagement) and/or ϵ use (e.g. measurements of the ratio of net to gross nitrate uptake and associated rates of root respiratory ATP production). However, such high-throughput tools are not available.Consequently, we need to consider new ways of assessing variation in ϵ biosynthesis . Here, one option is to screen for variation in the relationship between plant respiration and photosynthesis (i.e. what fraction of daily fixed carbon is respired rather than conserved in plant biomass). Another is to look for variability in the relationship between respiration and relative growth rate (i.e. screen for genotypes that achieve high growth rates while also having low rates of respiration).What evidence is there that rates of plant respiration vary among genotypes that differ in productivity? Here, insights can be drawn from the eco-physiology literature which has shown that inherently fast-growing species respire a lower fraction of daily fixed carbon than their slow-growing counterparts (Poorter et al., 1990;Lambers & Poorter, 1992;Loveys et al., 2002). Rates of whole-plant respiration are also relatively similar among species that differ markedly in relative growth rates, with high growth rates of some species being achieved without concomitant proportional increases in respiration rates. Such studies point to variation in ϵ biosynthesis being an outcome of evolution, with ϵ biosynthesis being highest in fast-growing species adapted to resource-rich, favourable habitats, and lowest in species adapted to resource-poor, unfavourable habitats.Further evidence of the possible link between ϵ biosynthesis , biomass accumulation and yield comes from the work done on Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass) in the 1980s. In a series of papers by Wilson, Jones and Robson, up to 13% increases in biomass accumulation and up to 40% increases in annual yield (in repeated years) were observed in plants grown under highdensity conditions and selected for lower rates of mature leaf respiration (Wilson, 1975(Wilson, , 1982;;Robson, 1982a,b;Wilson & Jones, 1982). In Wilson (1982), slow-respiring and fast-respiring progeny were produced by pair-crossing parents within either a slow-or fast-respiring cultivar. Additionally, progeny with low rates of mature leaf respiration were found to have higher net assimilation rate, relative growth rate, dry weight at harvest and leaf area index. Another study comparing selected fast-and slowrespiring ryegrass cultivars found the slow-respiring cultivar to have higher shoot and root mass at each harvest point (Day et al., 1985). More recently, selection across multiple generations of lines with low respiration rates has been shown to be associated with higher yields in canola (Hauben et al., 2009). Thus, there is some evidence that screening for variability in plant respiration rates may enable genotypes with higher ϵ c to be identified, with future work needing to use screens to ultimately identify what genes are responsible for variability in ϵ biosynthesis .Ó 2022 The Authors New Phytologist Ó 2022 New Phytologist Foundation.New Phytologist (2023) 237: 60-77 www.newphytologist.comThe link between respiration, growth and yield is not, however, always consistent. For example, in perennial ryegrass, the relationship between low rates of mature leaf respiration and improved biomass accumulation disappeared when plants were grown in lowdensity swards (Kraus et al., 1993), a result that was supported by a later study (Kraus & Lambers, 2001). Similarly, there is evidence that the growth of pea plants is linked to the efficiency of the respiratory system in some studies (Musgrave et al., 1986) but not others (Obenland et al., 1988). Thus, future efforts to explore the link between respiration, growth and yield will need to ensure that this relationship holds over a wide range of industry-relevant planting regimes.One of the challenges facing work designed to link respiratory rates to photosynthesis, biomass accumulation and yield is the need to screen large numbers of plants for variability in traits of interest and to establish the genetic basis of variability in ϵ biosynthesis . In the past, assays of photosynthesis and respiration were painstakingly slow, limiting our ability to screen large numbers of plants. Similarly, growth analysis required repeated destructive harvesting of plants. However, in recent years, methods have been developed that enable each of these parameters to be quantified in high throughput. Growth analyses are now possible using light detection and ranging technology to quantify aboveground biomass in field experiments (Jimenez-Berni et al., 2018;Furbank et al., 2019;Walter et al., 2019;Jin et al., 2020). For respiration, a breakthrough was the development of a high-throughput, robotic fluorophore method for measuring respiratory O 2 uptake (Scafaro et al., 2017). This method has provided the opportunity to screen hundreds of plant samples per day and has revealed that there is substantial variation in leaf respiration rates among genotypes of individual species, both in wheat (Scafaro et al., 2017) and Arabidopsis (O'Leary et al., 2017). Subsequent work has also shown that we can use hyperspectral reflectance signatures to predict variability in leaf respiration rates of laboratory and field-grown wheat (Coast et al., 2019), further increasing our ability to screen respiration rates in field trials; similarly, hyperspectral reflectance can be used to predict photosynthetic capacity in wheat (Silva-Perez et al., 2018). There is now an opportunity to use these methods to screen diversity panels and recombinant inbred line populations for variations in leaf respiration, photosynthesis and growth, and to identify quantitative trait loci for traits associated with high ϵ biosynthesis .To fully exploit the potential for screens of variability in respiration rates to be used in strategies to improve ϵ biosynthesis , consideration needs to be given, not just to screening variations in leaf respiration (R leaf ), but also R stem and R root . An understanding of the fraction of whole-plant biomass allocated to leaves (LMF), stems (SMF) and roots (RMF), with rates of whole-plant respiration (R total ) being calculated according to:The challenge going forward will be developing high throughput, (ideally) nondestructive ways of estimating stem and root respiration, and the patterns of biomass allocation above and belowground.How would a warmer world temperature affect ϵ c ?Given that the world is warming, it is important to understand how rising temperatures affect ϵ c . Noting that ϵ c ¼ α  ϵ prod  ϵ use (Eqn B7), any temperature-dependent change in the factors and processes previously discussed would likewise influence ϵ c . On a short-term timescale, increasing temperature past the photosynthetic optimum will decrease photosynthetic efficiency by decreased Rubisco carboxylation, damage thylakoid membranes and induce changes to vapour pressure deficit that result in stomatal closure (Mathur et al., 2014;Dusenge et al., 2019). At the same time, respiration, along with photorespiration and reactive oxygen species, is stimulated by increasing temperatures (Tjoelker et al., 2001;Mundim et al., 2020). Importantly, the initial imposition of heat likely results in an increasing proportion of respiratory ATP being used to support maintenance processes instead of growth (Gibon et al., 2009;Scafaro et al., 2021). Rapid increases in temperature result in membranes becoming more fluid and therefore leaky (Allakhverdiev et al., 2008), decreasing ϵ use as a result of more ATP being needed to maintain ion gradients across membranes and decreasing ϵ prod as protons leak across the IMM (Divakaruni & Brand, 2011). Heat also increases the rate of protein turnover and associated demand for respiratory ATP, lowering ϵ use . More severe temperature increases can denature proteins, deactivating enzymes and elevating the cost of maintenance chaperone and heat shock proteins, further lowering ϵ use (Wang et al., 2004). Such factorscombined with knowledge of the mechanisms via which plants adjust membrane fluidity (via alterations in the degree of saturation of fatty acids) and stabilise proteins (e.g. via synthesis of heat shock proteins), as well as thermally acclimate photosynthesis and respiration (Smith & Keenan, 2020) will need to be considered in work targeting higher ϵ c in crops developed to cope with more frequent and severe heat waves.Considering abiotic stress more broadly, the complex, interacting nature of many of the components affecting energy efficiency in plants requires a multivariate investigative approach. Screening for trait variation in ϵ prod and ϵ use and isolation of genetic candidates via GWAS or QTLwhile being an approach that can enhance classical breeding approachesis complicated by the high degree of environmental sensitivity of ϵ prod -and ϵ use -related traits (O'Leary et al., 2019;Scafaro et al., 2021). As such, the experimental design used to screen trait ϵ prod and ϵ use variation needs to be done in ways that enable the roles of genetics and adverse environments to be clearly identified.A further option to improve ϵ prod and ϵ use is to combine the above trait screens with additional approaches that harness the potential of genetic engineering. For example, modern genetic engineering techniques will permit the introduction of low-cost alleles that maintain stress responsiveness by targeting modifications to specific tissues only under permissive conditions, or by editing regulatory elements of promoters to better tune expression under such (Smith et al., 2011), while knockout of AtNDB2 lead to susceptibility to environmental stress (Sweetman et al., 2019). Therefore, a strategy for improvement will need to be tissue specific or timed to avoid these detriments. Alternative oxidase pathway Flux through AOX does not pump protons into IMM Replace constitutive AOX isoform with a diel-scheduled isoform (such as with a light-specific promoter region) to increase ϵ prod at night (Amthor et al., 2019). ϵ use Growth Construction costs Expensive constituents (lignin, protein, lipids) cost > 2 g glucose g -1 to construct Employ Fourier transform (near-) infrared spectroscopy for high-throughput screening for variation of chemical composition in tissues (Collins et al., 2014).Membrane composition Lipids in membranes are expensive to synthesise and leaky membranes can reduce efficiency of cellular processesEngineer DNA nanostructures to mimic transmembrane proteins, regulate liposomes, modify membrane morphology and mediate membrane interface chemistry (Feng et al., 2021).Slowing protein turnover may translate to higher growth rate and biomass (Jacoby et al., 2016), for example by modifying synthesis of THI4, a high-turnover protein (Hanson et al., 2018).Inefficient energy use with no net gain in useful productMinimising enzymatic sucrose degradation and resynthesis (especially that paired with active transport), or F6P/F16BP cycling under specific developmental or stress conditions (Amthor et al., 2019).Active transport costs ATP Upregulate SWEET/SUC/WAKL proteins to increase phloem loading, biomass and yield (Xu et al., 2020).Ó 2022 The Authors New Phytologist Ó 2022 New Phytologist Foundation.New Phytologist (2023) 237: 60-77 www.newphytologist.com conditions (Zhang et al., 2018). The generation of a range of cisregulatory element edits provides the opportunity to produce a wide range of expression levels of endogenous genes, producing a broader range of potential trait variation than can be seen in natural populations (Rodriguez-Leal et al., 2017;Liu et al., 2021). Because of this, trait stacking (i.e. incorporation of multiple genetic modifications into a single variety of a crop) via transgenesis has enormous potential to speed up the process of crop improvement compared with approaches that relay on traditional breeding approaches. Trait stacking has proven successful in improving crop resistance/tolerance to biotic stresses (Dormatey et al., 2020) where a binary responseimmune or susceptiblecan be easily assessed; with improvements in high-throughput phenotyping methods, the same is likely to be true for assessing the outcomes of stacking of traits that contribute to improved ϵ c . While 'trait stacking' will not always deliver overall positive outcomes for plant metabolism and biomass accumulationwith balance between positive vs negative likely to depend on developmental stage, environment and management practicesthere is clearly potential to create crop lines with marked improvements in ϵ c through exploring the effect of multiple changes in energy-related traits.As outlined earlier, annual increases in crop production are well behind that needed to meet future global demand for food, with new ways needed to improve yield potential (Y p ). Our review has highlighted opportunities to increase Y p using a range of approachessummarised in Table 1 that target photosynthesis and respiration to improve the efficiency with which light energy is converted into biomass (ϵ c ). For photosynthesis, this includes changes in the properties of Rubisco and photosynthetic induction rates to increase carbon fixation (Table 1). Minimising photorespiratory carbon loss through metabolic engineering to increase carboxylation rates while still allowing oxygenation at a reduced but viable rate also shows promise (Table 1). Similarly, reducing the percentage of daily fixed carbon that is released through respiration could improve ϵ biosynthesiswith there being potential to improve the efficiency of ATP synthesis (i.e. ϵ prod ) and/or ATP use (i.e. ϵ use ) to improve ϵ c (Table 1). When such changes are brought together through a 'trait stacking' approach, there is potential to create additive or even multiplicative improvements to ϵ c , and through it, a step change in Y p . Key to exploiting the potential to improve yields through increases in efficiency of photosynthesis and respiration will be the development of high-throughput assays that quantify components of ϵ c . We suggest prioritising high-throughput and digital phenotyping of these components through hyperspectral and automated fluorophore systems and associated growth. The ability to phenotype variation in the balance between respiration, photosynthesis and growth across many plants would provide opportunities to exploit genetic variation in α and ϵ biosynthesisand through them ϵ c and Y p . Collectively, a focus on these strategies will inform breeding programmes targeting the increases in annual yield necessary to keep pace with increasing demand for food, reduce the amount of land used for agriculture, limit the demand for inorganic fertilisers and restrict greenhouse gas emissions from the agriculture sector.","tokenCount":"9122"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0049169232.json b/data/part_2/0049169232.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8af8c4e53be8772c0732839d957b98d6132deb78 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0049169232.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"95f23df9307f8eeecbf5d2263bbbcda8","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/43ff8ee7-bb7f-4f17-ae00-271145325531/retrieve","id":"122789945"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"f23150b8-64b9-4b7b-819d-c54857f63a00","pagecount":"10","content":"• Contested hegemony: peasantry and nation-state formation processes in Latin America 10 .• Agency: relationship between producer families, private companies and the state (from field schools and farm plans to Heirs of Tradition).• Power dynamics within families, youth livestock producers as a discrete social group 1,2,4,6,7,9,11,12,13 .• Participation in educational projects, as well as in rural household economies.The origins of \"Heirs of Tradition\", (2012-2020)• Alquería's program and the company's importance in Colombia's dairy sector. • Pilot initiative in Meta, Colombia, one of the most affected regions due to the presence of armed actors and illicit crops. • Objetive: to tackle the low rates of schooling amongst producers, and the need for a technification of livestock farms to increase their productivity and, in turn, the quality of life of families. • Initial field activities were centered on two major fronts: ECAS or field schools (Escuelas de Campo) and the Plan Finca (farm plan), an educational initiative that introduces tools to facilitate the planning and improvement of farms (Alquería's suppliers) 15 .The role of young participants • Objective: that \"young farmers from different parts of the country be trained on livestock practices at no cost and enhance their knowledge and skills on management of soil, animals, and the environment\".• Address generational transfer, critical issue in the livestock sector in Colombia and Latin America at large 3,5,8,14,16,17 .• Duration: two years. It awards the title of Livestock Production Technologist.• The first 18 months students receive their training at SENA educational centers, and the last 6 are spent in practical on-the-job experience.• 2020-2021, partnership with the Alliance Bioversity International-CIAT (environment, productivity, socioeconomics)The program at a glance (students, dissagregated) Assessing the impact achieved (qualitatively)• Interviewing former and present participants on their perceptions of the program, and exploring if they continued a career in the livestock sector or maintain their bonds with the company.• Bridging and facing gender disparities (not central to the project from its inception, yet critical in terms of equality, and generational transfer).• Maintaining the program for educational purposes (that can and will benefit the company), in addition to the improvement of milk quality and farm management.\"I was able to gain vital knowledge and tools to grow professionally, as a farmer and as a family member. Yet, overcoming gender stereotyping was one of the hardest parts, as many employers (producers, managers) could not stand the fact of being somewhat \"trained\" by a woman.\"• Closer, deeper relationships with producers and their families, getting to know their needs and ways of life• COVID contingency: rethink educational initiatives when circumstances deepen existing gaps (gender inequity, access to technology and information, remote learning, etc).• Build on past and present testimonies to strenghten the program onwards: listening To young farmers, amplifying their concerns and including their feedback. In sum, contesting hegemonic relationships, as historiographical readings on rural Latin America suggest.","tokenCount":"472"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0064710375.json b/data/part_2/0064710375.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f9f2a936b1f912a9a77d9a783e5cc7380083b5fa --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0064710375.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a5a3dd2fd9ff119e24029ff7bc75f9f6","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/396f66ca-003a-467b-80c5-879eeb43f33d/retrieve","id":"-1624170991"},"keywords":["gender equality","social equality","women's empowerment","food systems","climate change","resilience"],"sieverID":"ddd33538-46cd-4513-afed-ea1fcaf6d298","pagecount":"12","content":"The CGIAR Generating Evidence and New Directions for Equitable Results (GENDER) Impact Platform is grateful for the support of CGIAR Trust Fund Contributors (www.cgiar.org/funders) and in particular wishes to thank the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations for supporting this work (https://www.fao.org/home/en).These evidence-based papers address key themes important for gender and social equality, and women's empowerment in agriculture and food systems. They each discuss: • current status and emerging thinking • the theme's relevance for transformative change toward more inclusive food systems • the evolution of equality in agriculture and food systems over the past 10 years in low-and middle-income countries • what has proved effective to ease structural constraints, and promote equality and empowerment • specific suggestions about interventions, programs and policies that can help make agriculture and food systems more inclusive.COVER PHOTO CREDIT: Felix Clay/Duckrabbit/WorldFish. Weeding maize, Mongu, Western Zambia.Generating Evidence and New Directions for Equitable Results (GENDER) is CGIAR's impact platform designed to put gender equality at the forefront of global agricultural research for development. The Platform is transforming the way gender research is done, both within and beyond CGIAR, to kick-start a process of genuine change toward greater gender equality and better lives for smallholder farmers everywhere. gender.cgiar.org.The working paper has gone through a process of nonblinded peer review by two reviewers external to the CGIAR GENDER Impact Platform, and has also been reviewed by the FAO team working on the 2023 FAO report on the Status of Rural Women in Agrifood Systems. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations nor of the CGIAR GENDER Impact Platform.Elizabeth Bryan, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), e.bryan@cgiar.org (Corresponding author)Glossary of terms in gender equality in agri-food systems workAdaptation (to climate change) for human systems refers to the process of adjusting to actual or expected climate and its effects, in order to moderate harm or exploit beneficial opportunities (IPCC 2018). The options, strategies and measures for adaptation can be categorized as structural, institutional, ecological or behavioral (IPCC 2018).Adaptive capacity is the ability of systems, institutions, humans and other organisms to adjust to potential damage, to take advantage of opportunities or to respond to consequences (IPCC 2018;MEA 2005).Agroforestry ''is a collective name for land-use systems and technologies where woody perennials (trees, shrubs, palms, bamboos, etc.) are deliberately used on the same landmanagement units as agricultural crops and/or animals, in some form of spatial arrangement or temporal sequence. In agroforestry systems there are both ecological and economical interactions between the different components. Agroforestry can also be defined as a dynamic, ecology-based natural resource management system that, through the integration of trees on farms and in the agricultural landscape, diversifies and sustains production for increased social, economic and environmental benefits for land users at all levels. In particular, agroforestry is crucial to smallholder farmers and other rural people because it can enhance their food supply, income and health. Agroforestry systems are multifunctional systems that can provide a wide range of economic, sociocultural and environmental benefits\" (FAO 2015).Aquaculture, or farming in water, ''is the aquatic equivalent of agriculture, or farming on land. Defined broadly, agriculture includes farming both animals (animal husbandry) and plants (agronomy, horticulture and forestry in part). Similarly, aquaculture covers the farming of both animals (including crustaceans, finfish and molluscs) and plants (including seaweeds and freshwater macrophytes). While agriculture is predominantly based on use of freshwater, aquaculture occurs in both inland (freshwater) and coastal (brackish water, seawater) areas\" (FAO n.d.a).Aspirations are defined as forward-looking goals or targets (Locke and Latham 2002) and as orientations toward a desired future, where such futures may be individual or collective projects, more immediate or longer term, and pertain to imaginations, affect as well as material practices (Huijsmans, Ansell and Froerer 2021).Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is a framework that is used to promote coordinated efforts to achieve three objectives (pillars): (1) increasing agricultural productivity and incomes, (2) adapting and building resilience to climate change at multiple scales, and (3) mitigating greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) from agriculture (Lipper et al. 2014). CSA provides a basis to evaluate alternative strategies and approaches to address climate change across the three pillars. It is often criticized for its lack of attention to political and equity dimensions.Crop productivity or yield is the output of either a particular crop or all crops produced on a unit of land. It is usually presented in physical weight (kilograms) per hectare.Endowment effects are the component of the gender productivity gap that is accounted for or explained by farmer characteristics and the unequal access to production inputs.Empowerment is the process by which people who have been denied the ability to make strategic life choices acquire such an ability. It encompasses three dimensions: resources (economic, human and social preconditions), agency (power-related processes), and achievements (well-being outcomes) (Kabeer 1999).Social empowerment entails receiving recognition in one's community.Economic empowerment entails generating income and purchasing of assets.Exposure and sensitivity to climate shocks and stressors are properties of a system, community or individual that are dependent on the interaction between the characteristics of the system (e.g., livelihood characteristics) and on the attributes of the climate stimulus (severity, duration, scale, etc.) (Smit and Wandel 2006).Fisheries refers to the capture of aquatic organisms in marine, coastal and inland areas, as well as their processing, marketing and distribution.Forest: \"Land spanning more than 0.5 hectares with trees higher than 5 meters and a canopy cover of more than 10 percent, or trees able to reach these thresholds in situ. It does not include land that is predominantly under agricultural or urban land use.\" (FAO 2022)Gender differences arise from the socially constructed relationship between women and men (Oakley 1972;Quisumbing and McClafferty, 2006). Sex differences, on the other hand, are biological and innate. The roles that women and men play in society show similarities and differences across classes and societies. Since the definition of men's and women's roles is specific to time and place, gender divisions are not as simple as 'ticking a box' (Moser 1989;Quisumbing and McClafferty, 2006). Gender differences affect the distribution of resources between women and men and are shaped by ideological, religious, ethnic, economic and social determinants (Moser 1989;Quisumbing and McClafferty, 2006). Being socially rather than innately determined, this distribution can be changed through conscious social action, including public policy.Gender gaps in productivity refer to either within-household or between-household differences in productivity between women and men. Broadly, two types of gender-based farming practices exist: individual and joint production units (farms). Intrahousehold gender productivity differences involve individual farms wherein plots are distinguished by the sex (female and male) of the plot owner or manager or decision-maker, usually wife and husband who are part of the same household; interhousehold gender gaps involve productivity differences (at plot or household level) between joint farms wherein households are distinguished by the sex of the household head or farm decision-maker in the household. Interhousehold gaps also involve productivity differences between households (joint farms irrespective of the gender of household head).Conditional gender productivity gap refers, in this report, to gendered productivity gaps reported after factoring in the gendered differences in access to and control over key agricultural resources such as land, agricultural inputs (fertilizer, improved seeds, plot area, climatic conditions, etc.).Unconditional gender productivity gap refers to reported gender difference in productivity after taking into consideration the gendered differences in access to and use of key agricultural resources such as land and inputs (inorganic fertilizer, improved seeds, etc.).Structural effects are the component of the gender productivity gap which is residual or unexplained by the observable factors and is due to unequal returns to production factors.Gender integration refers to the process of applying strategies in policy and program planning, assessment, design, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation to consider gender norms and to compensate for gender-based inequalities (Catacutan and Naz 2015;Njuki et al. 2013).Along the gender integration continuum, gender-blind programs are programs that ignore gender, gender differences and gender relations. Gender-accommodating programs acknowledge gender, gender differences and gender relations. They seek to ensure that women benefit but do not necessarily attempt to reduce gender inequality or address the gendered systems that contribute to the differences and inequalities. Gender-responsive/ gender-sensitive programs acknowledge gender differences in barriers and outcomes related to specific program objectives that aim to address gender inequalities in the local context through program design and implementation. Gender-transformative programs (such as gender-transformative approaches below) seek to address structural barriers and transform gender relations to promote gender equality (USAID 2017; ICO 2022).Gender-transformative approaches actively strive to examine, question and change rigid gender norms and imbalances of power. They encourage critical awareness among women and men of gender roles and norms, promote the position of women, challenge the distribution of resources and allocation of duties between women and men, and/or address the unequal power relationships between women and others in the community (Rottach, Schuler and Hardee 2009).The ultimate goal of gender-transformative approaches is to catalyze gendertransformative change whereby norms and other structural barriers to gender equality are removed and more equal power relationships emerge.Hazard refers to the potential occurrence of a natural or human-induced physical event or trend that may cause loss of life, injury or other health impacts, as well as damage and loss to property, infrastructure, livelihoods, service provision, ecosystems and environmental resources (IPCC 2018).Institutions, as commonly defined in economic and political sciences, are the \"rules of the game\" of a society or, in other words, the rules, norms and conventions that people devise to guide, constrain or enable human interaction and behaviors. Institutions can be established formally, through rules such as statute law, common law, regulations and the enforcement mechanisms of these, or informally, through more informal conventions, normative or selfimposed rules of behavior, traditions and their enforcement mechanisms (North 1990;IPCC 2022). From a post-institutionalist perspective, institutions are defined as \"regularised patterns of behavior that are made and remade through people's practices but emerge from underlying structures and sets of 'rules in use'\" (Leach, Mearns and Scoones 1999, 237).Discriminatory social institutions are formal and informal laws, social norms and practices that restrict or exclude women and consequently curtail their access to rights, justice, resources and empowerment opportunities (OECD 2018). They consist of both formal constraints (sanctions, taboos, customs, traditions, codes of conduct/ norms) and formal rules (constitutions, laws, property rights). They influence decisions, choices, and behaviors of groups, communities and individuals (OECD 2018).Social norm is a rule of behavior that individuals prefer to conform to if they believe that most people in their reference network (i.e., people whose behaviors and beliefs matter to their own behavior) conform to it (empirical expectations) and most people in their reference network believe they ought to conform to it (normative expectations) (Bicchieri 2006). Social norms can be held in place, at least in part, by anticipation of positive and negative sanctions (Cislaghi and Heise 2018).Gender norms are a subset of social norms defining acceptable and appropriate actions for women and men and governing behaviors and practices in a particular social context and at a particular time in a given group or society. They are informal, deeply entrenched and widely held beliefs about gender roles, power relations and standards or expectations that people tend to internalize and learn early in life. They are embedded in formal and informal institutions, nested in the mind and produced and reproduced through social interaction. Gender norms play a role in shaping women and men's (often unequal) access to resources and freedoms, thus affecting their voice, power and sense of self. They sustain a hierarchy of power and privilege that typically favours what is considered male or masculine over that which is female or feminine, reinforcing a systemic inequality that undermines the rights of women and girls and restricts opportunity for women, men and gender minorities to express their authentic selves (Cislaghi and Heise 2020; UNICEF 2020).Laws: Rules of conduct formally recognized as binding or enforceable by an established authority. Laws relating to gender issues include personal property and inheritance laws and laws prohibiting gender-based violence, sexual harassment and discrimination (Markel and Jones 2014).Livestock are ''domesticated terrestrial animals that are raised to provide a diverse array of goods and services such as traction, meat, milk, eggs, hides, fibres and feathers. The term livestock systems embraces all aspects of the supply and use of livestock commodities, including the distribution and abundance of livestock, the different production systems in which they are raised, estimates of consumption and production now and in the future, the people engaged in livestock production and the benefits and impacts of keeping livestock.\" (FAO n.d.b).Mitigation (of climate change) refers to a human intervention to reduce emissions or enhance the sinks of greenhouse gases (IPCC 2018). Mitigation measures are technologies, processes or practices that contribute to mitigation, such as renewable energy technologies, afforestation and soil carbon sequestration.Policies are statements by a government of what it intends to do or not to do, including laws, regulations, decisions or orders. Markel and Jones (2014) note that policies differ from laws in that they do not have legal standing; however, they govern the management, decisions and actions of institutions.Relations are the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, groups and organizations (Hillenbrand, Karim and Wu 2015).Resilience, broadly defined, is the capacity of social, economic and environmental systems to cope with a hazardous event, trend or disturbance, responding or reorganizing in ways that maintain their essential function, identity and structure while also maintaining the capacity for adaptation, learning and transformation (IPCC 2018). Most definitions of human resilience focus on the ability of people, households, communities, countries and systems to act upon a set of capacities to mitigate, adapt to and recover from shocks and stresses in a manner that reduces chronic vulnerability and maintains or improves well-being outcomes, such as food security (Frankenberger et al. 2014;Mercy Corps 2016;USAID 2012USAID , 2017)).Resilience capacities include absorptive, adaptive and transformative capacities. These are subject to gender and other social distinctions as well as the intersection of these identities, including those related to age, class, caste, ethnicity, marital status and sexual identity (Béné et al. 2014;Djoudi et al. 2016).Responses to climate change are broadly defined to include adaptation, mitigation, climate-smart or climate-resilient approaches. They can also be categorized in several different ways as coping, risk management, adaptive and transformative responses (Bryan et al. 2017;Theis, Bryan and Ringler 2019). Coping responses are usually short-term, ex post responses to experienced shocks or stresses and include actions like selling assets or changing consumption patterns and, at larger scales, humanitarian interventions (Corbett 1988;Dercon 2002). While coping responses may aim to maintain well-being at pre-shock levels, they are often associated with a deterioration in well-being, such as poorer diets and increased indebtedness. Risk management strategies, like diversifying production or livelihood activities, and adaptive responses, like adopting new agronomic practices, tend to be proactive and aimed at avoiding or minimizing harmful impacts of shocks and stresses over the medium to long term (Jost et al. 2016;Corcoran-Nantes and Roy 2018;Lawson et al. 2020). Transformative responses aim to change the fundamental attributes of a system or context to improve well-being outcomes, such as actions that directly address underlying social inequalities (McOmber, Audia and Crowley 2019;Carr 2020).Role models are defined as individuals who inspire people to make similar choices or adopt a similar set of values and to achieve comparable results (Madhavan and Crowell 2014;Porter and Serra 2020).Structural constraints on equality (by gender and other sources of social differentiation) are features of the institutional or normative environments (at any of multiple scales) that tend to restrain women from exerting agency and achieving their full potential.Technical efficiency is the effectiveness with which a given set of inputs is used to produce an output. A farm is said to be technically efficient if it is producing the maximum output from the minimum quantity of inputs, such as labor, capital and technology.Vulnerability encompasses a variety of concepts, including exposure and sensitivity to climate hazards and adaptive capacity (Adger 2006;IPCC 2018;Smit and Wandel 2006).Generating ","tokenCount":"2674"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0066536948.json b/data/part_2/0066536948.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..639c871b59a92846aee348a82d3fe7526557dc89 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0066536948.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"131e8adf9eeb86aa22579e50b27be8ed","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/2eff9f55-00ef-49ec-b6d4-f12ae91d5d54/retrieve","id":"-519941518"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"a9191a75-cdc1-4a65-918b-51c098a709e9","pagecount":"11","content":"Fair dealing and other rights are in no way affected by the above. The parts used must not misrepresent the meaning of the publication. ILRI would appreciate being sent a copy of any materials in which text, photos etc. have been used.Innovation Platforms as an approach to foster agricultural innovation Linking small scale farmers to markets using value chain approaches has become an important element of many agricultural developing interventions in developing countries.Traditional interventions normally focus on farm productivity to ensure food security among households and their capacity to market the surplus.Innovation Platforms (IPs) target a wide range of farmers, those who are still ensuring food security and those already participating in the market.Agricultural cooperatives often target farmers who are already engaged in growing cash crops and ensure that farmers maintain access to critical farm inputs, market farm products, strengthen farmers' bargaining power and improve income opportunities.There is a need for supporting the IPs which embrace a cooperative societies' approach. Such support would help to avoid certain pitfalls (see: the Bubaare IP Case Summary) and encourage the IPs trying to adopt the enhanced cooperative society's model to generate wider benefits.The role of an IP is to facilitate and strengthen interaction and collaboration in networks of farmers, extension officers, policy makers, researchers, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), development donors, the private sector and other stakeholder groups.The nature of agricultural innovation can be both technological (e.g. information and communication technology (ICT), agricultural inputs or machinery) and institutional (market approaches, modes of organization, policies and new rules).IPs aim at stimulating continuous involvement of stakeholders in describing and explaining complex agricultural problems and in exploring, implementing and monitoring agricultural innovations to deal with these problems.• They can provide various insights about the biophysical, technological and institutional dimensions of the problem.• They understand what type of innovations are economically, socially, culturally and politically viable.• Stakeholder groups become aware of their fundamental interdependencies and the need for action to address their constraints and reach their objectives.• Stakeholder groups are more likely to support and promote specific innovations in which they have been part of the decision making or development process.IPs provide opportunities for exchange of knowledge and learning, negotiations and dealing with power dynamics. They can contribute to strengthening the capacity to innovate across stakeholder groups which means the individuals, collectives or networks will be more capable of continuously shaping and adapting to change. This is because they collectively posses a varying degree of resourcefulness in assets, time, knowledge, dialogue, experimentation and persistence. The higher the capacity the better their ability to react proactively, flexibly and creatively to challenges and opportunities.• Continuously identify and prioritise problems and opportunities • Take risks, experiment with social and technical options, and assess the trade-offs that arise from these • Mobilize resources and form effective support coalitions around promising options • Link with others in order to access, share and process relevant information and knowledge • Collaborate and coordinate with others and achieve effective action.IPs can function on different levels ranging from the community or village level to the administrative or spatial levels, and these depend on their specific objectives such as:• Enhancing the capacity to innovate.• Supporting the scaling of successful local innovations.• Facilitation of national policy development and implementation.• Interconnected IPs may be required to strengthen the development and implementation of coherent intervention strategies across different levels.• The involvement of local producers, regional processors, distributors and retailers as well as certification bodies may be required.IPs have the potential to perform robust agricultural research, development and policy strategies. Their impact depends on the quality of platform organization and facilitation, communication within the IP, stakeholder representation and institutional embedding. Learning from the successful and effective IP case studies is essential to promoting best practices and role modelling the most effective approaches.The SSA CP is a research program developed, funded and implemented by the Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA). It was implemented between 2008-2010 and employed the Integrated Agricultural Research for Development (IAR4D) approach, which is an innovation-based research approach involving many stakeholders and innovative partnerships.SSA CP altogether formed 12 IPs in the region, four in each participating countries: Uganda, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo. The IPs formed around chosen value chains such as sorghum, potatoes or beans, which were selected by all stakeholders. Thanks to adopting the IAR4D innovation approach they were able to address most categories of agricultural problems at the same time.In Uganda problems such as poor management and political interference led to near-collapse of the cooperative sector. The case study of Bubaare IP demonstrates how the registration of the IP as a cooperative society has opened market opportunities for its members. The Bubaare IP was established with a focus on the development of the sorghum value chain. As a result, they managed to increase the production of sorghum grain, most of which is purchased by the Huntex Ltd to process it for producing Mamera. The members are also able to process and pack sorghum flour and they even managed to introduce it into supermarkets. Over the years the IP has introduced other value chains such as potato and honey. Members of the IP are welcome to have other enterprises. The registration of the Bubaare IP cooperative society has created opportunities for a large number of smallholder farmers to participate in various market activities. The other IPs in southwestern Uganda are in the process of registering as cooperative societies after they observed the achievements of the Bubaare IP cooperative society. This case presents how the registration of the Bubaare IP as a cooperative society has opened opportunities for a large number of smallholder farmers to participate in market activities. The model also empowered the farmers into innovations and product diversification, favoured women farmers who responded in large numbers to take advantage of the benefits offered.The Bubaare IP was formed in the Bubaare sub-country of Kabale District in southwest Uganda in the Lake Kivu Pilot Learning Site by the SSA CP.The Bubaare IP decided to focus on sorghum as the enterprise because every household in Bubaare grows a traditional sorghum variety. This plant has been used for generations to produce porridge and weaning food for babies and is a traditionally and culturally important crop.The crop, however, brings low yields and the process of producing it is tedious hence making it unprofitable. Locally processed products such as the weaning food for babies last only about three days.The IP decided to pursue value addition as the key driver of sorghum value chain development. The IP, led by an executive committee, set out to form a strategy for increasing production and value addition through improved processing and creation of market linkages.Since the establishment of the Bubaare IP in 2009 a number of innovations have been generated to support the development of the sorghum value chain and to link farmers to the market:1 Improved farming practices Before looking for market opportunities it was necessary to raise the quantity and the quality of sorghum produced by the local farmers. The two local wild varieties of sorghum mature in seven months and are harvested once a year. With support from SSA CP members of the IP were introduced to improved agronomic practices such as correct plant spacing.Kabale Zonal Agricultural Research Institute, which was one of the partner institutions, developed varieties of sorghum that mature in shorter time and have higher yields. As a result, currently about 50 percent of the IP members have adopted the recommended spacing for sorghum by planting in lines instead of broadcasting. They also apply fertilizers to improve yields.With a help from the Department of Food Science and Technology at Makerere University, the IP members/farmers produce two types of sorghum flour -unmalted sorghum for food and malted sorghum for porridge, which will soon be launched in supermarkets around the country.In order to enhance the development of the sorghum value chain from production to marketing, the community wanted to revise their Natural Resource Management byelaws. They realized that the existing byelaws were poorly implemented and inadequately enforced and that there was a lack of review procedures to maintain the relevance of the existing byelaws and to formulate new ones.The IP members mobilized their respective parishes and villages to begin the process of reviewing and formulating the byelaws. They were finally approved and implemented in several parishes and used to protect gardens and guide marketing procedures.The IP negotiated with one of the IP stakeholders, Huntex Ltd -a food processing company, to process and pack sorghum produced by the member farmers into a non-alcoholic beverage, Mamera. It has a shelf life of six months, which is much longer than the drink original sold in local supermarkets with the shelf life of only two weeks. The Mamera drink has now two varieties: sweetened with honey and unsweetened, and its new packaging makes it both attractive and hygienic.It became necessary to include other enterprises which the IP farmers were involved in and these included honey and Irish potato. The IP members also purchased equipment to produce and pack potato crisps and they will soon be launching it on the market.The IP purchased a computer which helps them research the market. The IP members have also been introduced into savings mobilization and a credit by a partner institution -Agriculture Innovation Systems Brokerage Association. Now the IP savings are kept with financial institutions such as Crane Bank, Muchahi Savings and Credit Cooperative.Your Key Takeaways:The Main Achievements of the Bubaare IP • Improvement of farming practices such as correct plant spacing and fertilizing • Development of a variety of sorghum that matures in shorter time and have higher yields • Revision of the existing byelaws and formulation of new ones to support the development of the sorghum value chain, protect the gardens and guide marketing procedures • One of the IP stakeholders, a food processing company Huntex Ltd, agrees to process sorghum into a non-alcoholic beverage Mamera and give it a much longer shelf life and an attractive packaging • Local farmers (the IP members) produce sorghum flour while the IP stakeholder company produces the Mamera beverage• The IP introduces other value chains such as honey and Irish potato. They also purchase equipment to produce potato chips and will soon launch them on the market • The IP purchases a computer to allow the members to research the market • The IP members are introduced into savings mobilization and a credit, and their savings are now kept with financial institutions.The Bubaare IP Success Factors• The political stability in the country provided a supportive environment for the private sector to develop • The local governments (district and sub-country) have given support to the IP activities • The government has pursued a conductive macro economic policy environment and a decentralized form of governance. This, in turn, supports innovativeness to the point that specific localities are able to deal with development challenges.• The sub-country administration provided the venue for the IP meetings as well as security for the IP property• The identified stakeholders to join the IP were suitable to address the challenges of the community • The following institutions contributed to the above developments: Huntex Ltd, KAZARDI, KDLG, Ministry of Trade, Tourism and Industry (MTTI), NGOs.Why the Bubaare IP registered as a Cooperative SocietyThe Bubaare IP was initially registered as an association, which allowed the members to operate within the district, get into ventures and interactions. The development partners gave them a grant of 30,000 USD for the expansion of sorghum production and the processing it into larger quantities of Mamera. The IP decided to loan the funds to Huntex Ltd to expand their premises and purchase the required equipment to process and package Mamera.As advised by one of the major IP stakeholders, through the District Commercial Office, at this point they needed to be formally registered beyond the level of an association. This would allow them to sue and to be sued in courts of law in case of a breach of contract by the IP or Huntex Ltd.The process of registration was initiated by the District Commercial Office and after the meetings with IP members during which the implications of such registration were explained, the IP was finally registered as Bubaare Innovation Platform Multipurpose Cooperative Society in 2013. It became the first among the 36 IAR4D-driven IPs in Sub Saharan Africa to register as a cooperative society.Outcomes and the impact of the Bubaare IP registration as a cooperative society 1 Infrastructural development• The sub-country authority donated a piece of land for future developments and let the IP use a store for bulking and storing sorghum• The registration of the IP cooperative society has given them a new status • The society has decided to embark on the construction of a new building to house their office, a community bank, a potato processing unit, sorghum milling, packaging facility and a computer room• The premises at Huntex Ltd. have also been expanded and more equipment purchased to process larger quantities of sorghum having the capacity to produce 2,000 litres of Mamera from 250 kg of per day. The previous capacity was 50 litres from 13 kg per day.2 Increased formation of Self Help Groups (SHGs) and a membership in the society• Since the registration of the IP cooperative society, there has been more Self Help Groups formed and joining the IP to take advantage of the benefits. Total membership has risen from 32 in 2009 to 1121 in 2014.• After becoming a cooperative society the new plans provided incentives for more farmers to join. The plans included signing a contract with Huntex Ltd to purchase more of the farmers' sorghum, hence ensuring the market for it. As a result more farmers have joined since then.• More women farmers joined the IP than men farmers most likely due to the fact that the crop is commonly grown by women. After the registration, the number of women farmers doubled with more of them taking leadership positions.3 Increased access to small affordable loansThe society was able to internally generate funds from its members to create a start-up capital for loaning to the groups. Individuals or an entire group may borrow funds to grow crops, to store sorghum which is later sold when the market price is favourable or for other enterprises. In general, the affordable loans have opened up more market activities among the IP member groups and individuals.The IP cooperative society enabled member farmers to obtain short-term small and affordable loans, which was a big incentive for farmers and especially for women farmers to form Self Help Groups and to join the IP.Since they joined all the SHGs have been able to get a loan.Small affordable loans are available to a wide range of socio-economic groups of farmers, who can use the loans for a variety of enterprises and to market their products outside the cooperative. The IP cooperative society has overcome the challenge, which prevented women and poorer farmers from joining a conventional cooperative society and receiving a loan. Also, under normal circumstances women would not own items that could be used as security and would not have any formal identification. As a result, the IP encouraged more socio-economic diversity in membership and impact across different socio-economic groups.4 Improved supply of good sorghum grain to Huntex Ltd.The supply of sorghum grain to Huntex Ltd has improved. Since signing the contract both the society and the Huntex Ltd have been able to meet their obligations.The registration has increased the demand for training in savings, lending, marketing and processing. KDLG in partnership with Makarere University contracted Durosh Empowerment Consult Ltd to train the Self Help Groups. Altogether 32 Groups were trained by the end of 2014 and were given a free savings kit each. Women members were entrusted with the responsibility of counting the group's savings every time the group meets to collect their savings.6 The quality standards of the product are set to improve• The Bubaare IP cooperative society has linked with the Uganda National Bureau of Standards to obtain the S&Q marks for quality certification.• The Department of Food Science and Technology at Makerere University has trained IP members to process high quality flour and introduced the use of new equipment such as food weighing machines, sealers and food grade bags.• The Department has also analysed the nutrient content of sorghum and produced a label for the sorghum flour packets. Such standard certification procedures enable access to affluent but previously inaccessible markets in Kampala, a city eight hours away from Kabale.• The society is pursuing the patenting of Mamera.• The new status of the IP enables it to pursue the development of other value chains, which has already gained interest of organizations such as National Organic Agriculture Movement in Uganda.• There is need for the IP leaders and partners to internalize regulations of the new society to assist members to operate within these regulations. • It is not clear how membership will be sustainably motivated as unlike in a conventional society members of an IP cooperative society do not receive yearly bonuses related to their shares. The contribution of shares by member SHGs and the potential bonuses have not yet been worked out. • As the society continues to expand it might be necessary to employ professionals to run a society as a business entity as conventional societies do.IP cooperative as a business entity:• An IP cooperative is a business with full legal rights, which give it the credibility, recognition and more opportunities for support from development partners, to attract other credible partnerships both within and outside the country. • It has possibilities to engage new development partners while still owning the cooperative.• It can engage the services of a consultancy company, a new processor, an input provider and much more as new innovations develop. • It can also provide several services itself. It may operate a SACCO to provide loans to its members, establish a bulking store for farmers' produce, operate a processing plant.Development partners with resources to make investments should be encouraged to participate in an IP in order to support private sector engagement with small farmers. In the Bubaare case, Huntex Ltd did not have the incentive funds to expand its plant for processing sorghum. With the development partners of the IP funds were made available for the expansion of the premises and purchasing equipment for processing large quantities of sorghum under a contract.Public sector institutions such as Ministry of Trade, Tourism and Industry are instrumental in supporting the registration process of IPs. Local governments should be aware of the concept of an IP to help interpret regulations of the cooperative movement that could be used in the new proposed model of cooperative society and help to facilitate IPs requiring the same registration but with diversity of activities. Such support will enhance the transfer of already observed impact of an IP cooperative society across the entire sub-sector in Uganda.The Bubaare IP, which was the first to register as a multipurpose cooperative society, is still adapting itself to operating both as an IP and a cooperative society.The IP multipurpose cooperative society created in Bubaare is a new model of cooperative society and is a key factor of their success because:• It creates wider impact in the community with less transaction and monitoring costs than a conventional primary society.• The IP is comprised of Self Help Groups as members. Each group has 20-30 individuals who due to a lack of relevant society in the area or a lack of resources to buy shares to join a conventional society would not have been able to join any. Thanks to the new IP cooperative society model it is now possible.• The group members monitor each other's recovery of the acquired loan, which in turn reduces the cost of monitoring. • The individual members of SHG each produce commodities of their choice at the scale they can manage, which enables the IP society to produce variety of products from a very large number of small farmers. These farmers would not have been targeted by a conventional society.• The IP society is part of a wider IP of which partners and private sectors are stakeholders but not necessarily members of the cooperative society. This enables long term support from partners such as research institutions, private sector or farmers. The IP remains open to wide membership while it still owns its cooperative society.","tokenCount":"3399"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0070496228.json b/data/part_2/0070496228.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6f6d04f7ea6152571c7a0f78f15ca6feb240af31 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0070496228.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4a44433c7d22328ab78a7db796513f2a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/cb4cbb96-8bed-46d3-a082-248e9067a293/content","id":"-2036063523"},"keywords":["maize","multiple-hybrid population","heterosis","heterotic groups","combining ability"],"sieverID":"41b42a4f-300e-4ef0-8448-0692bfbb8d51","pagecount":"16","content":"Combining Ability and Heterosis in Maize efficiency by using both temperate and tropical maize to broaden genetic basis. Large sets of parental lines with available genotypic information can be shared and used in worldwide hybrid breeding programs through an open-source breeding strategy. Potential applications of the reported results in developing hybrid maize breeding strategies were also discussed.Understanding combining ability and heterosis among diverse maize germplasm resources is important for breeding hybrid maize (Zea mays L.). Using 28 temperate and 23 tropical maize inbreds that represent different ecotypes and worldwide diversity of maize germplasm, we first developed a large-scale multiple-hybrid population (MHP) with 724 hybrids, which could be divided into three subsets, 325 temperate diallel hybrids and 136 tropical diallel hybrids generated in Griffing IV, and 263 temperate by tropical hybrids generated in NCD II. All the parental lines and hybrids were evaluated for 11 traits in replicated tests across two locations and three years. Several widely used inbreds showed strong general combining ability (GCA), and their derived hybrids showed strong specific combining ability (SCA). Heterosis is a quantifiable, traitdependent and environment-specific phenotype, and the response of parental lines and their hybrids to environments resulted in various levels of heterosis. For all the tested traits except plant height and hundred grain weight (HGW), NCD II (temperate × tropical) hybrids showed higher average heterosis than the temperate and tropical diallel hybrids, with higher hybrid performance for ear length, ear diameter, and HGW. Tropical maize germplasm can be used to improve the yield potential for temperate lines. Grain number per row and grain number per ear were two most important traits that determined yield heterosis, which can be used as direct selection criteria for yield heterosis. The hybrids from heterotic groups, Reid × SPT, Reid × LRC, SPT × PA, and Lancaster × LRC, contributed highly significant positive SCA effects and strong heterosis to yield-related traits, and the heterotic patterns identified in this study were potentially useful for commercial maize breeding. Heterosis was more significantly and positively correlated with SCA than GCA, indicating that SCA can be used in heterosis prediction to develop potential hybrids in commercial maize breeding. The results of the present study not only contribute to developing breeding strategies, but also improve targeted breedingMaize (Zea mays L.) is one of the most important crops for staple food, livestock feed, edible oil, and biofuel (Mackay, 2009). Its cradle is in America's tropical and subtropical areas, subsequently generating a variety of ecotypes and diverse germplasm through a process of evolution and domestication. Compared to temperate maize, those developed in tropical and subtropical zones usually have more diverse genetic variation with resistance to diseases and pests, flourishing roots, toughness stalk, lodging resistance, drought tolerance, and higher levels of heterosis in their hybrids with temperate inbreds (Vasal et al., 1992). The phenomenon of heterosis or hybrid vigor was perceived by Darwin (1876) and described as hybrid F1 offspring exhibiting phenotypic superiority than both parents (East, 1908;Shull, 1908). In plants, heterosis could be attributed to the interaction among multiple loci, depending on hybrids and traits (Schnable and Springer, 2013), as shown in the magnitude and ratio of heterosis for biomass (Li et al., 2001), flowering related traits (Krieger et al., 2010), yield (Luo et al., 2001), and resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses (Miller et al., 2015).Utilization of heterosis is of great importance for agricultural production and one of the most successful examples in crops is from maize (Duvick, 2001). Breeding practice indicates that the performance of parents per se is not consistent with the hybrid performance. Excellent hybrid varieties are not necessarily derived from elite parents. Therefore, breeders should judge a parental line by its potential to produce superior hybrids, not only by its performance per se (Riedelsheimer et al., 2012). To identify the parental lines with great potential in making hybrids, combining ability has been estimated and used to select desirable parents and thus their hybrids. Two types of genetic parameters, GCA and SCA, have been used, which may be primarily caused by additive and non-additive gene actions, respectively (Sprague and Tatum, 1942). GCA for an inbred line is measured as the average performance for all the hybrids produced with that inbred line as the common parent, and SCA for a specific cross or hybrid is measured by the deviation of the hybrid performance from what can be predicted by the parental GCA (Sprague and Tatum, 1942). In generally, GCA evaluation is performed at early generations or breeding stages in order to save time and money in hybrid breeding, particularly in hybrid maize breeding (Sprague, 1946). The relative contribution of GCA and SCA effects to hybrid performance depends on traits and hybrids, and in some cases, for example, aflatoxin and grain yield (GY) (Meseka et al., 2018), GCA effects are more important than SCA effects. Evaluating GCA is inevitably a cumbersome and time-consuming task, becoming one of the major constraints in hybrid breeding programs.To breed ideal hybrids with high GY (Yong et al., 2019), good quality (Machida et al., 2010) and strong resistance to biotic (Sibiya et al., 2013) and abiotic stresses (Makumbi et al., 2018), heterosis and combining ability have been analyzed for available germplasm with limited numbers of parental lines. Heterosis and combining ability are usually estimated by populations derived from special genetic designs, such as diallel (Griffing, 1956) and the NCD II (North Carolina design II) (Comstock and Robinson, 1948), which are two most powerful genetic designs for combining ability analysis and have been applied extensively. Using an NCD II with 6 × 18 parents, the combining ability analysis indicated that at least one parent with higher GCA is required for producing a hybrid cross with high SCA for nitrogen use efficiency (Cui et al., 2014). Heterotic grouping among 378 hybrids derived from diallel crosses of 28 early inbreds was evaluated for their tolerance to Striga hermonthica, indicating that grouping based on SCA and GCA was the most effective in classifying early maturing maize inbreds for tropical maize breeding programs (Akinwale et al., 2014). Therefore, the better understanding of the genetic basis of heterosis and combining ability we can get, the more effective maize improvement programs and hybrid performance prediction can be achieved (Dhillon and Singh, 1977). However, only limited numbers of parents and their hybrids have been used so far, with a few of exceptions that over 100 hybrids were used (Akinwale et al., 2014). The population for a hybrid crop with a large number of hybrids generated from mating designs can be simply called as multiple-hybrid population (MHP) (Wang et al., 2017). Using a specific mating design or a combination of multiple designs, large-scale MHPs can be produced for more effective analyses of combining ability and heterosis. Diverse germplasm from different ecotypes, including temperate and tropical maize, should have been used for identifying genetic variation for both basic research and commercial breeding. So far, very few analyses of combining ability and heterosis have been performed using the hybrids between different ecotypes in maize (Fan et al., 2016). Considering great genetic diversity existing in tropical maize germplasm that could contribute to further genetic improvement, more studies are required by using between-ecotype hybrids. Therefore, large-scale analysis of heterosis and combining ability using diverse germplasm resources will improve our understanding of hybrid performance significantly, thus contributing to increased genetic gain in maize hybrid breeding.Here we report a large-scale analysis of combining ability and heterosis using an MHP consisting of 724 hybrids derived from 28 temperate and 23 tropical maize inbred lines. Our objective was to measure heterosis in both intra-and between-ecotype hybrids, estimate GCA and SCA effects and compare combining ability and heterosis across ecotypes and environments. Our results will facilitate our future maize breeding through improved combining ability analysis, defined heterotic patterns and broaden genetic basis using different maize ecotypes. The largescale phenotypic data, combining with high-density genotypes, which can be shared and used in worldwide hybrid breeding programs through open-source breeding strategy, will provide a great opportunity for whole genome prediction of heterosis and hybrid performance.A maize MHP was developed by using diallel and NCD II mating designs consisting of 28 temperate and 23 tropical inbred lines, representing a broad selection of breeding germplasm from temperate and tropical regions (Wang et al., 2017). The 724 hybrids were developed, which were divided into three subsets, 325 temperate hybrids derived in Griffing IV involving 26 parental lines, 136 tropical diallel hybrids involving 17 parental lines, and 263 NCD II hybrids generated between 13 temperate and 21 tropical parental lines. Among the 28 temperate inbred lines, 15 were from China and 13 were from United States, which included six heterotic groups, Reid, SPT, LRC, Lancaster, PA, and PB (Wang et al., 2017). Among the 15 Chinese temperate lines, six are common testers, including Ye478, HZ4, Dan340, Mo17, Tie7922, and Qi319, which have been widely used in Chinese maize breeding programs. The rest nine Chinese temperate inbreds have been also playing a very important role in hybrid breeding across maize zones in China. The 23 tropical lines have been widely used as parents across worldwide breeding programs in China and CIMMYT, three of which, Jiao51, Chuan29 Female, and 18-599, are from China.The temperate diallel hybrids, NCD II hybrids and their parental inbred lines were phenotyped in 3 years (2013)(2014)(2015) and two locations, Shunyi, Beijing (116.6 • E, 40.2 • N) and Xinxiang, Henan (113.8 • E, 35.1 • N) in randomized block design with two replications. The tropical diallel hybrids were phenotyped in Jinghong, Yunnan (100.8 • E, 22.0 • N) in 2014 and Sanya, Hainan (109.2 • E, 18.4 • N) in 2015. In each replication, each entry was planted with two 4-m rows with 25 cm between plants and 60 cm between rows. Thinning was done at the fifth leaf stage to maintain a density of 66,600 plants/ha. Traditional agronomical practices for local maize production were adopted in each trial to manage the experimental plots.Eleven traits of agronomic importance for hybrid performance were investigated. Two flowering related traits, days to silk (DTS) and days to anthesis (DTA) were scored. At harvesting stage, plant height (PH) and ear height (EH) were measured and seven yield-related traits, including ear length (EL), ear diameter (ED), row number (RN), grain number per row (GNPR), grain number per ear (GNPE), hundred grain weight (HGW) and grain weight per plant (GWPP), were measured after the harvested ears were air-dried. PH and EH were measured as the average height from ground to the top of the tassel and from ground to the node of the ear, respectively, each with five consecutive plants after excluding the edge ones. DTS and DTA were measured as the number of days from sowing to 50% silk and 50% anthesis, respectively. EL, ED, and RN were measured as the length from the ear bottom to tip, the diameter in the ear middle, and RN per ear, respectively. HGW was estimated with three samples of 100 kernels randomly selected from the total kernels and measured to give the average.(1) SCA and GCA effects were calculated as described by Sprague and Tatum (1942) and Griffing (1956):where g i and g j are the GCA effects for i-th and j-th lines, respectively; s ij is the SCA effect for ij-th hybrid; y ij is the trait value of ij-th hybrid; ȳi. is the average of the hybrids among i-th line crossed with a series of parents; ȳi.. is the overall mean.The genetic variances of GCA and SCA effects were obtained in a joint linear mixed model analysis of MHP over all tested environments by following Riedelsheimer et al. (2012):where y ijkl is the phenotypic observation for the i-th environment, µ is the overall mean, L i is the i-th fixed environment effect, b j(i) is the effect of j-th block within the i-th environment, gca k and gca l are the random GCA effects of the k-th female and the l-th male, sca kl is the random SCA effects of the k-th and the l-th parents, L × gca ik and L × gca il are the random GCA by environment interaction effects, L × sca ikl is the random SCA by location interaction effect, and e ijkl is the random error.GCA/(GCA + SCA) ratio was calculated using the equation modified from Baker (1978) by Hung and Holland (2012):where σ 2 GCA is the variance of GCA effects derived from the mean square of GCA and σ 2 SCA is the variance of SCA effects derived from the mean square of SCA. Since the total genetic variance among F1 hybrids is equal to twice the GCA component plus the SCA component, the closer this ratio is to unity, the greater the proportion of a specific hybrid's performance can be predicted based on GCA alone (Baker, 1978).(2) Heterosis was estimated based on two criteria, mid-parent heterosis (MPH) and high-parent heterosis (HPH), using the following formulae:where F1 is the mean performance of F1 hybrids, MP is the parental mean, and HP is higher parent values for all tested traits.(3) Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for phenotypic performance was performed based on combined data and linear mixed model by following Hallauer et al. (2010):where y ijkl is the i-th phenotypic observation for the j-th year, kth environment, and l-th block, µ is the overall mean, v i is the effect of i-th cross, y j is the effect of j-th year, s k is the effect of k-th environment, (vy) ij is the interaction effect between i-th cross and j-th year, (vs) ik is the interaction effect between i-th cross and k-th environment, (ys) jk is the interaction effect between j-th year and k-th environment, (vys) ijk is the interaction effect among i-th cross, j-th year, and k-th environment, r l(jk) is the effect of l-th block within j-th year and k-th environment, and e ijkl is the error. The genetic effect v i is considered as fixed effect while all other effects as random.Broad sense heritability (H 2 ) was calculated for each trait by following Knapp et al. (1985):where σ 2 G is genotypic variance of the hybrids, σ 2 GL is genotype × environment interaction variance, σ 2 E is error variance, L is the number of environments and R is the number of replications per location.The ANOVA was performed to evaluate the effects of genotype (G), environment (E), and the interaction (G × E) using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS R . 1 Best linear unbiased predictions (BLUPs) were used to estimate phenotypic traits across multiple environments based on a linear model (Brown et al., 2011). Calculation of GCA, SCA, MPH and HPH were conducted based on the BLUP value for each trait. The correlation coefficients were assessed by the \"cor.test\" function in R, and the significance of the correlation coefficient was tested with t-test.Phenotypic performance across environments and years with tested traits for inbreds and hybrids is shown in Table 1. Significant genotype effects were found for all measured traits (P < 0.01), indicating significant genetic variation among parental lines and hybrids (Supplementary Table 1). For the temperate diallel and NCD II hybrids, environment and year had significant effects on all traits except DTS and DTA, and genotype by environment effect was significant for all traits except RN. Significant genotype by year interaction (P < 0.01) were also found for all traits but PH and HGW. Therefore, the phenotypic performance of inbreds and hybrids was significantly affected by genotype, environment and genotype by environment interaction (Supplementary Table 1). Highly significant GCA and SCA effects were found for all tested traits (Table 2). Significant GCA × E and SCA × E interaction effects were revealed for all the traits but RN. GCA/(GCA + SCA) ratios indicate that the tested traits were predominantly controlled by additive gene effects. Broad-sense heritability estimated was high (0.77-0.93) for all traits except GWPP (0.59), suggesting that phenotypic variation observed in flowering time and yield-related traits was highly inheritable (Table 2). GCA effects were highly variable across the traits (Supplementary Table 2). In the temperate diallel, 13 temperate inbreds showed negative GCA effects for PH and EH, suggesting that these inbreds had genetic potential for reducing plant and EHs. Two inbreds, P11 (HZ1) and P22 (Qi319), showed positive GCA effects for GNPE, HGW, and GWPP. P26 (Zheng58) exhibited positive GCA effects for HGW and GWPP but negative effects for PH and EH, indicating its value in increasing GY and deceasing plant sizes. The line P2 (AS6103) showed negative effects on PH, EH and flowering related traits, with stress tolerance at early flowering stages. P19 (PH4CV) and P20 (PH6WC) had positive effects on yield traits. For 28 temperate inbred lines, American inbred lines had desirable GCA effects on HGW and GWPP, while Chinese ones had desirable GCA effects on other yield-related traits with shorter plant and EHs. For tropical parental lines, CIMMYT inbred lines had much better GCA and performance than Chinese lines. P38 (TR0415), P41 (622016-ZCN-2), P43 (CML312SR), and P48 (DTMA227B) contributed to shorter plant and EHs. P38 (TR0415), P43 (CML312SR), and P45 (CML330) contributed to early flowering. P39 (TR0423), P40 (18-599), P46 (CML504), and P50 (TR0582) contributed to higher yield-related traits. In the NCD II, temperate inbred lines had desirable GCA effects on EL, ED, HGW, DTT, and DTS, while tropical ones had more favorable effects on EH, RN, GNPR, GNPE, and GWPP. Several widely used inbreds showed higher desirable GCA effects, and SCA analysis demonstrates that the hybrids with elite materials as parents have been identified as combinations with higher desirable SCA effects (Supplementary Table 3). As shown in Figure 1 for the hybrids from different heterotic groups, the hybrids from LRC × PA showed the lowest SCA effects on PH, EH, GNPR, and GNPE but the highest SCA effects on DTS and DTA. PA × PB hybrids had the lowest SCA effects on yield-related traits, including ED, HGW, and GWPP. Reid × LRC hybrids had the highest SCA effects on PH, EH, and RN. Reid × SPT and Lan × PB hybrids had the lowest SCA effects on flowering related traits than the hybrids derived from other heterotic groups. There was no significant difference found in SCA effects for the hybrids between tropical and temperate groups. From the aforementioned analysis, Reid × SPT, Reid × PB, Reid × LRC, and SPT × PA had favorable SCA effects for yield-related traits, while Reid × SPT and Lan × PB had lower SCA effects for flowering related traits.Significant MPH and HPH were observed for all the tested traits (Tables 3, 4). Two flowering related traits, DTS and DTA, exhibited negative heterosis, while others exhibited positive heterosis. For all the tested traits except HGW, a higher level of heterosis was observed in NCD II hybrids than in temperate and tropical diallel hybrids, indicating a higher level of heterosis in between-ecotype hybrids. NCD II hybrids showed a higher level of negative heterosis for flowering related traits, indicating that compared to tropical by tropical hybrids, NCD II (temperate × tropical) hybrids, with shorten growth period and improved stress tolerance, have advantages allowing them to be planted in temperate conditions. Overall, NCD II hybrids showed high levels of heterosis for EH and yield-related traits, indicating that temperate by tropical hybrids showed obviously stronger heterosis than intra-ecotype hybrids. Temperate diallel hybrids showed the lowest level of heterosis on flowering related traits, illustrating that they flowered earlier than other hybrids. The result revealed that tropical hybrids showed stronger heterosis on vegetative traits, while between-ecotype hybrids, i.e., temperate by tropical hybrids, showed a higher level of yieldrelated heterosis.The correlation of heterosis among traits varied greatly (Figure 2). MPH showed highly significant correlation (0.87) between two flowering traits, DTS and DTA. Conversely, the correlations of the flowering traits with other traits were lower than 0.30. Yield-related traits exhibited highly significant MPH correlation with each other except HGW. A very similar trend was observed for HPH (Figure 2). Highly significant correlation was observed between MPH and HPH for all the tested traits, and the correlation for yield-related traits was higher than 0.77 (Table 5). Thus, observed heterosis largely depends on the genotype and could be correlated with related traits. Heterosis per se (MPH and HPH) can be treated as a phenotypic trait and used for genome selection and heterosis prediction.In temperate diallel hybrids and NCD II hybrids, significantly different levels of MPH were observed between two environments, Shunyi and Xinxiang, for all tested traits except ED, GNPR, and HGW (Figure 3A). Significantly different levels of HPH were also observed for all tested traits except GNPR and HGW (Figure 3B). Parents, hybrids and their combined effects contributed to the varied heterosis levels across environments. The response of maize parents and their hybrids to environmental factors may result in different levels of heterosis. We used the coefficient of variation (CV) to evaluate the stability of parents and their hybrids across the two environments. For 8 of the 11 traits, parents exhibited significantly higher CVs than hybrids (Supplementary Figure 1), indicating that for these traits the unstable heterosis across environments was driven more significantly by unstable parental lines. The rest three traits, including GNPR, HGW, and GWPP, did not exhibit significantly different CVs between hybrids and parents. These results indicate that a great variability existed in hybrids and parental lines across environments for all tested traits, and hybrids were more stable than parental lines. From the above results, environmental variables affect heterosis and hybrid performance greatly when maize hybrids and inbred lines respond differently to environmental stimuli.We evaluated the average levels of heterosis across heterotic groups for the tested traits (Figures 4, 5). The Reid × LRC hybrids showed higher MPH for PH, but higher HPH for RN. The Lancaster × LRC hybrids had higher MPH for EH, and GNPE. The SPT × LRC hybrids had higher MPH for RN. Therefore, LRC group can be used to increase heterosis for yield-related traits. Both Reid × PA and Reid × PB hybrids had lower MPH and HPH for yield-related traits. SPT × LRC and Reid × SPT hybrids had lower MPH for DTS and DTA. Nonsignificant difference was found in MPH for DTA, EL, HGW, GNPR, and GWPP, or in HPH for EL, ED, HGW, DTA, GNPE, GNPR, and GWPP, among heterotic groups. Tropical × Lancaster, tropical × SPT, tropical × LRC hybrids showed higher MPH for GNPR, GNPE, and GWPP, but higher HPH for HGW, GNPE, and GWPP. Therefore, the hybrids from specific heterotic groups tended to exhibit specific trait advantages. For example, LRC group showed favorable heterosis for yield-related traits, while LRC, SPT and Lancaster groups had lower heterosis for flowering related traits.Yield was evaluated based on GWPP. The tested hybrids showed significant MPH and HPH for both yield and six yield-related traits (Tables 3, 4). GWPP in temperate diallel hybrids showed 141.30% (MPH) and 116.21% (HPH) on average over parental lines. Moreover, the hybrids showed significantly higher yieldcomponent traits than both parents. The means and ranges of seven yield-related traits in three subset populations were shown in Supplementary Figure 4. The result indicates that apparent heterosis for yield-related traits was observed in the three types of populations. The average performance of hybrids in the temperate diallel was higher than that in the NCD II and tropical diallel hybrids for ED, RN, GNPR, GNPE, while the performance in NCD II was higher than that in other two populations for EL, ED, and HGW. Temperate × tropical hybrids exhibited better yield performance and heterosis than within-ecotype hybrids for most of yield-related traits. Maize yield is determined by GNPR, GNPE, RN, and HGW. Improvement of GNPE related traits is an effective way for breeding yield heterosis. As GNPE is the multiplication of GNPR and RN, in-depth analysis of the traits related to GNPE has important theoretical and practical impacts on hybrid breeding. However, GNPR and RN are two traits that interact with each other, and GNPE is determined by both GNPR and RN. MPH showed highly significant correlation between GNPR and GNPE (0.95), between GNPE and RN (0.75) and between RN and GNPR (0.55) (Figure 2). GNPR and GNPE were two most important traits which determine yield heterosis.Heterosis for GNPR and GNPE in the temperate diallel was 58.80 and 77.18%, respectively. Heterosis for RN and HGW (13.39 and 12.14%, respectively), was relatively low, even with negative effects (Supplementary Figures 2, 3). When compared across years and locations, heterosis for GY and yield-related traits were varied significantly. Correlation analysis of heterosis between the two environments, Shunyi and Xinxiang, indicates that heterosis for yield-related traits was significantly affected by environments.The correlation of heterosis between Shunyi and Xinxiang was more significant for GNPR and GNPE than for RN and HGW (Supplementary Figures 2, 3). As heterosis for RN and HGW was relatively low (Tables 3, 4), no steadily MPH or HPH across the environments was observed. When these observations are considered together, yield heterosis can be largely explained by two major yield-related components, GNPE and GNPR, which in most cases have to offset the negative effects of RN and HGW. By examining the top 5% hybrids ranked by MPH and HPH of GWPP and four representative commercial hybrids from China, Xianyu335 (P19 × P20), Zhengdan958 (P21 × P26), Yedan13 (P10 × P16), Ludan981 (P06 × P22) (Figure 6), significant yield heterosis (MHP and HPH) was observed in all the selected hybrids, and GNPE was a major contributor to yield heterosis. GNPR was also an important determinant for yield heterosis in most hybrids. In contrast, no consistent heterosis (MPH and HPH) across environments or hybrids was observed for RN and HGW. Thus, the results suggest that both MPH and HPH for GNPE and GNPR were highly stable or consistent across these high-yielding and commercial hybrids, whereas those for RN and HGW were case-dependent.Simple linear correlation coefficients were used to reveal the relationship among MPH, HPH, GCA, SCA, and F1 hybrid performance (Table 5). MPH was highly significantly correlated with SCA, and also positively correlated with GCA for all tested traits expect PH, EH, and ED. HPH was positively correlated with the sum of parental GCAs for all the tested traits except EH, DTA, ED, and GWPP. Hybrid performance showed stronger correlation with the sum of parental GCAs than with hybrid SCA. The strong correlation between heterosis (both MPH and HPH) and SCA suggests that SCA could be used to predict hybrid performance and heterosis. In contrast, no significant correlation was found between heterosis and GCA for most tested traits. The correlation of hybrid performance with SCA was higher than that with heterosis (MPH and HPH) for PH, EH, DTA, DTS, ED, and GWPP. We found that both MPH and HPH were significantly correlated with SCA, while their correlation with the sum of parental GCAs was not consistent across the tested traits. Meanwhile, we also found that both SCA and the sum of parental GCAs were highly significantly correlated with hybrid performance, and SCA was highly significantly correlated with heterosis (MPH and HPH).Combining ability and heterosis among maize lines and correlation between combining ability, heterosis and hybrid performance provide important insights for developing breeding strategies, defining heterotic groups, and predicting hybrid performance. Complex trait dissection and crop improvement for combining ability and heterosis need to use diverse germplasm resources and large populations. Although required phenotypic variability exists in diverse maize germplasm, most researches have been using relatively small sets of inbred lines (Fan et al., 2014;Badu-Apraku et al., 2015), largely due to the fact that the number of hybrids that can be produced increases exponentially with the increase of parental lines. The MHP used in this study, consisting of 724 hybrids, was developed with Griffing IV diallel and NCD II designs using temperate and tropical elite maize inbreds as parental lines, which is suitable for combining ability and heterosis analysis and can be used for breeding different ecotypes by taking the advantages of different maize germplasm resources. Both diallel and NCD II designs can provide detailed genetic information, including dominance-recessiveness relationships and genetic interactions.In this study, an MHP could be used to reveal useful information about combining ability, heterosis, hybrid performance and genotype × environment interaction.On the other hand, the parental lines, which have been genotyped using 55K SNP markers and resequencing (Wang et al., 2017), can be shared with international collaborators. By inferring hybrid genotypes from their parental lines, various sets of MHPs can be developed for a specific target environment or research purpose, by sharing the 51 parental lines, from which any set of hybrids, up to 1275, can be generated. If the number of parental lines increases to 200, which is manageable for many breeding programs, up to 19,900 potential hybrids can be generated to meet the requirement of worldwide breeding programs. The genotyped parental lines can be used worldwide as proposed for open-source breeding programs (Xu et al., 2017(Xu et al., , 2020)).A full understanding of genetic basis of heterosis and combining ability remains elusive (Birchler, 2015), which, however, does not affect the vital role heterosis and combining ability play in maize breeding. Combining heterosis in different traits such as yield-related traits and stress tolerance could improve gain yield (Fujimoto et al., 2018). As shown in the present study, heterosis varied across environments as maize hybrids and inbred lines responded differently to environmental stimuli. Although heterosis was greatly affected by environmental variables, it is a quantifiable, trait-specific phenotype. In the temperate maize with six heterotic groups, the hybrids from different heterotic groups tended to exhibit trait-specific advantages. To be commercially advantageous, a hybrid should outperform its parents with respect to agronomic traits, especially the traits related to GY. Normally, GY heterosis is an important indicator of yield potential. In the present study, we demonstrated that heterosis was contributed mainly by two outperformed yield components, GNPE and GNPR. Moreover, heterosis was compromised in few cases by the negative effects of other component traits, RN and HGW. Therefore, GNPE and GNPR can be used as direct selection criteria for yield heterosis. Based on our analysis, nine elite inbred lines, HZ1, PH4CV, PH6WC, Qi319, Zheng58, TR0423, 18-599, CML504, and TR0582, had highly significant positive GCA effects for yield-related traits, which should have contributed to the improved hybrid yield. Six inbred lines, AS6103, PH4CV, PH6WC, TR0415, CML312SR, and CML330, manifested negative GCA effects for DTS and DTA, responsible for early flowering. The hybrids between heterotic groups exhibited various levels of dominance across traits, which were inconsistent among identified heterotic loci. In the elite maize hybrid Yuyu22 (Zong3 × Yu87-1), 13 heterotic loci were identified, including three for GY, seven for EL, one for RN and two for HGW (Tang et al., 2010). Several QTL were identified for seedling weight (SW), number of kernels per plant (NK), and GY in a cross between two elite inbred lines, B73 and H99 (Frascaroli et al., 2007). Using the elite maize hybrid Zhengdan958 (Zheng58 × Chang7-2), 38 heterotic loci for ear-related traits were identified, suggesting that the combination of heterotic loci in tested hybrids was genotype-dependent (Li et al., 2017). In another report, 156 QTL, 28 pairs of epistatic loci, and 10 QTL × environment interaction regions were identified, and the inheritance of yieldrelated traits and their MPH in Reid (PA) × Tem-tropic I (PB) hybrids with improved heterotic pattern is trait-dependent (Yi et al., 2019). The hybrids from different heterotic groups, Reid × SPT, Reid × LRC, SPT × PA, and Lancaster × LRC, showed highly significant positive SCA effect and heterosis. Considering combining ability (GCA and SCA), performance and heterosis together will help identify the hybrid combinations with comparative advantages for maize breeding. P05 × P21 (Lancaster × SPT), P07 × P21 (Reid × SPT), P32 × P23 (Tropical × SPT), P37 × P21 (Tropical × SPT), P39 × P21 (Tropical × SPT), P45 × P27 (Tropical × LRC), and P51 × P26 (Tropical × PA) contributed a highly significant positive SCA effect to GWPP and relatively high yield, MPH and HPH (Supplementary Table 3). As a result, these hybrids could be used in breeding for high yielding and wide-adaptability. Consequently, elite inbred lines with improved combining ability and associated heterotic patterns could be explored for efficient hybrid breeding.Introduction of exotic and diverse germplasms into breeding programs is of great importance in broadening genetic variation and thus improving breeding efficiency. Tropical maize germplasm, which come from the location of maize origin, host rich genetic diversity that can be used for temperate maize breeding. With the development of molecular markers and high-efficient genotyping technologies, researches have been introgressing favorable alleles from tropical into temperate maize, as shown in GY, grain moisture content and lodging resistance (Lewis and Goodman, 2003) and resistance to maize lethal necrosis disease (Gowda et al., 2015). Introgression of temperate maize germplasm into tropical lines did not disrupt the existing heterotic groups, because the introgressed lines remained genetically inclined towards the original heterotic groups from which they were derived (Musundire et al., 2019). In the present study, we observed higher average heterosis in NCD II (temperate × tropical) hybrids than that for within-ecotype hybrids for all yield-related traits except HGW, with higher hybrid performance for EL, ED, and HGW. Introgression of favorable genes and alleles from tropical maize germplasm can be explored to broaden the genetic basis of temperate maize, improve biotic and abiotic stress tolerance, optimize heterotic patterns, and develop improved temperate-tropical hybrids (Teixeira et al., 2015). Thus, large-scale analysis of combining ability and heterosis can facilitate improving targeted breeding efficiency using different ecotypes by broadening the genetic base of commercial hybrids.","tokenCount":"5585"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0072787289.json b/data/part_2/0072787289.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..26ade007ef460090722c2bcf460f6e3d9865ff12 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0072787289.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"86fa85a7dbd6bd3517ce37421c3270bb","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/38d9ee9a-3d80-421e-9b8f-a186250b124b/retrieve","id":"-888643527"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b88feed9-8eb0-4c66-9897-f391330abefa","pagecount":"23","content":"AICCRA-Ghana focuses on br idging the gap between research insti tutes that develop improved t echnologies and organizations that pr omote the adoption of developed technologies for the purpose of enhancing the resilience of t he countrys's agr iculture and food systems in the face of climate change while improving livelihoods of of farmers. AICCRA -Ghana mutualizes existing expertise to strengthen the t echnical, instit utional, and human capacity needed to move CGIAR innovat ions off the she lf and achieve impacts i n the country. The project will specifically launch a \"O ne -health platform for climate -driven pests and diseases\". It is an advanced climate -informed One -health innovation that builds on CGIAR's track records in this area, framing the nexus of the crop, li vestock, soil, and water health for improved human and ecosyste m health, food safe ty and nutrition, and climate change as a complex public health issue. The project is anchored to CGI AR's mult i -stakeholder platform of the Biorisk Management Facility (BIMAF ) hosted by IITA's station in Benin, West Africa. AICCRA -Ghana will use the CGIAR's Scaling Readiness Tool to undertake assessments of CSA options for accelerated upt ake of innovat ions. NFCS and innovation platforms including the private sector, Nour ishing Africa network, and farmer s will be capacitate d towards identi fication, promotion and implementation of suitable CIS and bestbet CSA and One -health innovations. Media and mass -campaign awareness will be launched while developing business models and engag ing champion wome nand youth-led enter prises. Pilot sites will be identified and training provided t o farmers for successful implement ation of One -health and CSA technologies.Building community resilience to climate risk through demonstration plots is a priority in sub-Saharan Africa, where the agricultural system is mainly rainfed and underdeveloped due to multiple underlying causes, such as limited access to information, improved seeds/inputs, modern production practices, and technologies. The use of demonstration plots serve as a platform to promote validated climatesmart and One health technologies. Under the current project, demonstration plots were used to provide training on good production practices of the various AICCRA-Ghana value chains. Thirty-one (31) demonstration plots were established across eighteen (18) communities in four agroecologies (Coastal savannah, Transition, Guniea savannah, and Sudan savannah) of Ghana. The value chains piloted were maize (13 pilots), yam (6 pilots), cowpea (8 pilots), and sweet potato (4 pilots). These value chains were chosen because of their socio-economic importance in Ghana. Maize and cowpea technologies constituted 42 and 26% of the number of demonstration plots established, respectively.Twenty-one field days were organized to introduce beneficiaries and other stakeholders in the project intervention communities to the various technologies the project demonstrated (i.e climate-smart seeds, One health innovations, and good agronomic practices). A total of one thousand one hundred and thirteen (1113) people directly participated in the field days. Four hundred and fifty-nine of the participants, representing 41% were female. While farmers from intervention communities expressed gratituted to the project, farmers from other communities that participated in the field days have requested for the project to extend the demonstrations to their communities. Generally, participants expressed their satisfaction and willingness to adopt these new technologies and incorporate them into their farming business next year and beyond.Food security is a major development challenge in Africa. Demand for food has been growing rapidly and will continue to do so in the conceivable future, exceeding 3% per year through 2025 (Ademola Braimoh, 2020). However, food production does not meet the pace of food demand. Multiple factors such as climate variability, pests and diseases, poor soil fertility, and low adoption of improved agronomic practices owing to inadequate access to information limit the pr oductivity of crop production. These challenges are not peculiar to isolated communities but are also major characteristics of communities selected to benefit from AICCRA project intervention. A major step towards the scaling up of CSA technologies is through the establishment of demonstration plots across communities to showcase community-specific technologies.Demonstration plots enable beneficiaries to observe improved technologies and their associated benefits as well as interact with researchers, extension staff , and other actors towards technology adoption.The study was undertaken in ten districts in six regions of Ghana including Central (Cape Coast and Komenda, Edina Equafo, Abirem District), Bono East (Kintampo North, Kintampo South, and Techiman North Districts), Northern (Tolon Districts), Upper East (Kassena Nankana and Bongo Districts), Upper West (Jirapa and Lawra Districts). Pilots/demonstration plots were established in twenty-two (22) communities in four of the six agroecological zones of the country ( Figure 1). The agroecological zones include the Coastal savannah, Transition Zone, Guinea, and Sudan Savannah agroecological zones of Ghana. Crop production in the transition zone is mainly rainfed and farmers remain vulnerable to climate change manifested in unpredictable rainfall patterns and elevated temperatures. The area is associated with low rainfall caused by drought stress, low soil fertility, and inappropriate seeds. The soil in the savannah area is fragile and liable to dry out rapidly due to free drainage. Guinea and Sudan Savanna Zones are characterized by a single rainfall season lasting from May to October with an average annual rainfall of about 700-1000 mm (MoFA, 2020). The area is characterized by short dry spells of three to five weeks which sometimes result in serious crop damage or complete failure. Rainfall is the main determining environmental element of the Sudan and Guinea Savanna zones. The vegetation is dominated by relatively short trees with grass, shrub and scrub undergrowth. The soils of Sudan and Guinea Savanna are mainly Ochrosols and Groundwater Laterites (SARI, 1996). The soils generally have a low organic matter that imparts a low fertility status to the soil (SARI, 1996). The Coastal Savannah area has an average annual rainfall of about 920 mm with bi-modal rainy seasons. The Agroecology is characterized by high population density and grassland savanna vegetation. The vegetation is grass interspersed with shrubs and, at times, residues of crops cultivated during the previous crop season.Five value chains namely maize, yam, cowpea, sweet potato, and tomatoes were piloted. These crops were prioritised and chosen by stakeholders in various intervention communities due to their socioeconomic importance in Ghana. They are regarded as food security crops as well as gender-friendly crops as they are highly consumed by households and produced in all the agro-ecologies in Ghana. The value chains were also selected due to their high potential to improve household nutritional food security. The matrix of the regions, districts, communities, selected value chains, and a number of pilots are shown below (Table 1). A total of thirty-one (31) demonstration plots were established in eighteen (18) communities across the four agro-ecologies (Fig. 1; Table 1) to test the different technologies under the various value chains (Table 2). Majority (42.0%) of the demonstration fields exhibited maize technologies four fields representing 12.9% of exhibited technologies on sweet potato weevil management technology (Figure 2). Thirteen (13) stress-tolerant maize varieties and hybrid demonstration plots were established (Figure 2). Certified seeds of each of the maize variety (Table 3) tested in demonstration plots was sourced from CSIR-Crops Research Institute, Kumasi and CSIR-Savannah Agriculture Research Institute, Tamale.Local varieties popularly cultivated by farmers in each community was tested along side. Seeds of local varieties were obtained from community agrochemical dealers. The plot size per treatment was 20m x 20m for each variety and the demonstrations were rainfed. All recommended activites such as nutrient, pest and weed management practices were carried out with farmers. To facilitate technology transfer, farmers were invited at various stages of the season to inspect demonstration fields (figure 3). Generally across all locations, it was observed that maize varieties introduced by the project outyielded local varieties (Figure 4). Mean grain yield of 4868 and 4841 kg were recorded by Opeaburo and Suhudoo respectively (Table 5). This was followed closely by Denbea and Abotem. Although Denbea and Abotem are early maturing compared to Opeaburo, they produced comparable maize grain yield.In all the communities, the local check produced the lowest grain, which ranged between 38 to 62% less compared with the other varieties tested. The highest yield of Suhudoo, Opeaburo, and Denbea, Abotem were observed in Dahyia, Offuman, Dompoase, and Adiemmra respectively. Across the various intervention communities, farmers appreciated, selected and expressed their preference for the maize varieties introduced by the project to local varieties. This was because they found them to be early maturing and tolerated stress better than the prefered local variety. With respect to the improved varieties however, farmers ranked Suhudoo and Denbea as the most preferred variety (Table 4) and requested the project to facilitate the provision and supply of seeds for cultivation in their farms. Their preference for Suhudoo and Denbea was based on the fact that these varieties, produced good yield, were early maturing, drought tolerant and biofortified. Demonstration fields were established (Figure 5) in ten AICCRA intervention communities to promote four cowpea varieties with various characteristics (Table 5). These were planted alongside locally preferred farmer varieties. Certified seeds of the four cowpea varieties were sourced from CSIR-Crops Research Institute, Kumasi and CSIR-Savannah Agriculture Research Institute, Tamale whilst the local variety was obtained from input dealers in each community. Each cowpea variety was planted on a plot size of 20 m x 20 m (400 m 2 ) and the demonstrations were established under rainfed conditions. The highest average cowpea seed yield of 1919kg was recorded by Nketewade (Table 6). This was followed closely by Padi-tuya, Zamzam, and Kirkhouse. In all the communities, the local check produced the lowest grain, which ranged between 40 to 52% less compared with the other varieties that were tested. The aim of the demonstration was to introduce farmers to ecological friendly low cost technologies to manage sweet potato weevils. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the intervention, an orange-flesh sweet potato variety susceptible to the sweet potato weevil was selected and vines obtained from farmers in the various intervention communities. Four demonstration fields in the Central Region were established (Table 1; Figure 6). Sweet potato vines of 20-30cm were cut from healthy parents showing no signs of insect damage and symptoms of viral attack and planted on ridges. Two technologies were exhibited along side farmer practices (Table 7). The plot size per treatment was 20 m x 20 m (40 m 2 ) for each treatment. The demonstrations was rainfed and harvesting of sweet potato was done 12 weeks after planting of vines. Across the communities, it was observed that tubers harvested from CS One Health plots were generally larger and cleaner than tubers from farmer practiced plots (Figure 7). The highest average tuber number and weight per plant was recorded at Dompose. This was observed in plots where sweet potato vines were treated in crude neem extract, soil amended with 40 g neem powder and onion used as border plants. On the contrary the lowest tuber number and weight was recorded at Cape Coast under farmer practice treatment (Table 8). While no incidence of damage tubers were observed in neem+ onion border treatment at Dompoase, 46.7% of harvested tubers in the farmer practice at CapeCoast were damaged and unmarketable. Using neem leaf powder amendment and onion as border plants showed positive effect on weevil infestation. It was realized at all locations that, applying neem leaf powder amendment plus onion border resulted in higher tuber weight and numbers compared with sole neem powder amendment and farmer practice. However, at all locations, the two CS-One health intervention practices demonstrated resulted in higher tuber numbers,weight and low incidence and severity of weevil infestation than the farmers' practice. 9) with farmer practices in yam production. For the the bundle CSA-One health practice, yam minisettes (50g) were treated with a cocktail of insecticides and fungicide before planting. At planting, 40g neem leaf powder was applied per stand on the rideges as soil ammendment. For the farmer practice, the conventional means of cultivating yam was followed.Generally for all locations, raised mounds (~1m high) were constructed, seed yam of approximately 250-300g was used with no form of seed treatments or soil amendment practice followed. At every location, the two technologies (Bundle CSA-One Health and Farmer) were set at 5m apart for easy monitoring and comparism. Each practice occupied a land size of 300m 2 (20m x 15m). An average of 14 ridges and 150 mounds were constructed on bundle CSA One Health and farmer practice plots respectively. An average of 45 plants were planted per ridge. Famers expressed delight about the number tubers harvested (Figure 9) from the size of land utilized for the demonstrations. It was however more thrilling as more tubers were harvested from bundle CSA One Health plots than farmer practice plots in all the communities (Figure 10) although the number of ridges constructed were less than the number of mounds formed on farmer plots. The total number of tubers harvested from bundle CSA-One Health plot was about 30% more than farmer practice plots.Similarly, higher tuber weights were recorded in majority (67%) of the bundle CSA One Health plots compared to farmer pratices plots except in Adiemra and Tanoboase where, tuber weight from farmer practice plots were higher than bundle CSA One health plots (Figure 11). Treating seed yam coupled with the application of neem leaves powder resulted in lower incidences of nematodes infestation as well as activity of yam beetles damage. As high as 84 and 44.5 % tubers from farmer plots showed varied symptoms nematodes infestation and arthropod pest damage respectively (Figure 12-13). A total of twenty-one field days were organized in the AICCRA intervention communities to showcase the potential of the various varieties (Figure 14). One thousand one hundred and thirteen (1113) participants were reached directly through the field days. Also, four hundred and fifty-nine participants, representing 41% were female. During the field days, participants were introduced to various technologies (i.e climate-smart seeds and good agronomic practices). The capacities of participants were also strengthened on best production practices and post-harvest handling technologies.Discussions were also organized around current challenges and opportunities with regard to access and cost of climate-smart seeds. Participants also assessed the technology to indicate their preferences. This document has provided summary of demonstration activities successfully organised to transfer different adoptable bundled CSA One Health technologies to small scale resource poor farmers in 22 communities in 6 regions of Ghana. In all the piloting activities, farmers were engaged in all stages of implementation such as the planning process, site selection, land preparation, field establishment and maintenance and harvesting. The farmers had the opportunity of meeting and interacting directly with researchers and other stakeholders. Results and observations from the demonstrations have clearly shown that the adoption and utilization of improved technologies have the potential to increase productivity and improve livelihood of farmers. All the 1113 farmers reached out to, through the various field days confidently attested to the fact that using technologies introduced by the project can help build resilience against both biotic and abiotic conditions. The stress tolerant maize and dual purpose cowpea varieties tested did not not only prove to be tolerant to major stresses such as striga, pest and diseases and drought in the communities but also outyielded all farmer preferred and popular varieties in each locality. Similarly, application of one health technologies such as application of neem leaves powder improved tuber health quality of both yam and sweet potato. More interesting, the use of onion Demonstration pilots are effective means of scaling up technologies. Engaging farmers and letting them own the process ensured full participation and success of the activities. Again for technology to be accepted, it should be readily available and the beneficiaries will need to easily relate to. Neem leaves from which neem leaves powder was prepared was found and accessible in all the communities making it easier for beneficiaries to appreciate it. To reap the full benefit of the demonstration activities, seeds of maize and cowpea varieties should be accessible to farmers in the community to facilitate adoption of the technologies promoted. ","tokenCount":"2660"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0082560569.json b/data/part_2/0082560569.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c388bf355eec29dd80238d5614a1ebf0e26dc2c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0082560569.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"da0edf04ee2e81d469bebcaa7cd4813b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/940ebaa6-613b-49e0-8096-171b37428b25/retrieve","id":"1739516356"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"415556e1-4de3-4c84-96dc-2a7e18d878b5","pagecount":"17","content":"The discovery and use of genetic markers associated with carotenoid levels can help to exploit the genetic potential of maize for provitamin A accumulation more effectively. Provitamin A carotenoids are classes of carotenoids that are precursors of vitamin A, an essential micronutrient in humans. Vitamin A deficiency is a global public health problem affecting millions of people, especially in developing countries. Maize is one of the most important staple crops targeted for provitamin A biofortification to help alleviate vitamin A deficiency in developing countries. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) of maize endosperm carotenoids was conducted using a panel of 130 diverse yellow maize tropical inbred lines genotyped with Genotyping by Sequencing (GBS) SNP markers. Numerous significant association signals co-localizing with the known carotenoid biosynthesis genes crtRB1, lcyE and ZEP1 were identified. The GWAS confirmed previously reported large effects of the two major carotenoid biosynthesis genes lcyE and crtRB1. In addition, significant novel associations were detected for several transcription factors (e.g., RING zinc finger domain and HLH DNA-binding domain super family proteins) that may be involved in regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis in maize. When the GWAS was re-conducted by including the major effects of lcyE and crtRB1 genes as covariates, a SNP in a gene coding for an auxin response factor 20 transcription factor was identified which displayed an association with b-carotene and provitamin A levels. Our study provides a foundation for design and implementation of genomics-assisted selection strategies for provitamin A maize breeding in tropical regions, and advances efforts toward identification of additional genes (and allelic variants) involved in the regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis in plants.Carotenoids are diverse organic pigments that are naturally found in plants and other organisms (Cazzonelli 2011;Moran and Jarvik 2010). The b-ionone ring(s) containing carotenoids, known as provitamin A carotenoids (e.g., b-carotene, b-cryptoxanthin and a-carotene), are precursors of the essential micronutrient vitamin A in humans (Fraser and Bramley 2004;West and Darnton-Hill 2008). However, humans cannot synthesize vitamin A de novo, and therefore need to obtain the nutrient from dietary sources either as preformed vitamin A (retinol) from animal-based foods (e.g., liver, whole milk, and egg), and/ or as precursors of vitamin A from colored vegetables and fruits (e.g., carrots, dark green leaves and papaya) in the form of provitamin A carotenoids (West and Darnton-Hill 2008).Vitamin A deficiency is a global public health problem. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 190 million pre-school children and 19 million pregnant women worldwide were vitamin A deficient (in the period [1995][1996][1997][1998][1999][2000][2001][2002][2003][2004][2005] with a prevalence rate of 33 and 15%, respectively, based on low serum retinol content (,0.7 mmol/ liter) (World Health Organization 2009). Almost half a million children lose their sight every year due to xerophtalmia caused by vitamin A deficiency, the leading cause of preventable blindness (Sherwin et al. 2012). Millions of child deaths annually are attributed to vitamin A deficiency coupled with other undernutrition problems (Black et al. 2003).Genetic improvement of staple crops for improved nutritional quality (e.g., enhanced level of micronutrients) has been termed biofortification and is a promising approach for reducing vitamin A and other micronutrient deficiencies in human populations. Maize represents a significant proportion of the total calorie intake of people in many African countries, accounting for 30% of the per-capita calorie consumption in Eastern and Southern Africa, even reaching as high as 56% in some of the southern African countries (FAO, 2011). The biofortification of maize with higher levels of provitamin A carotenoids could play a significant role in reducing vitamin A deficiency in regions where maize is a major staple crop (Wurtzel et al. 2012;Burt et al. 2011;Meyers et al. 2014). While breeding lines of maize that can accumulate up to 26 mg/g b-carotene (and 30 mg/g of provitamin A carotenoids) in the endosperm have been reported (Pixley et al. 2013), commonly cultivated maize varieties contain low levels of provitamin A carotenoids ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 mg/g (Harjes et al. 2008).Understanding the genetic variation, genes and regulatory mechanisms controlling maize endosperm carotenoid levels is important for biofortification of maize with high levels of provitamin A carotenoids. Genome wide association study (GWAS) approaches are a powerful approach for ascribing gene-phenotype relationships (Huang and Han 2014;Yu and Buckler 2006;Zhu et al. 2008), while genotyping by sequencing (GBS) is a next-generation sequencing (NGS) based genotyping approach that has dramatically facilitated large-scale genomewide marker development and GWA studies in crop species (Chia et al. 2012;Davey et al. 2011;Elshire et al. 2011;Varshney et al. 2014).A number of GWA studies have identified loci controlling agronomic traits such as plant height, yield and yield components, flowering time and plant architecture in a range of crops, including barley (Pasam et al. 2012), tomato (Shirasawa et al. 2013), wheat (Edae et al. 2014;Wang et al. 2014), and maize (Thornsberry et al. 2001;Wang et al. 2012). GWA studies have also identified loci associated with grain quality traits including oil content in maize (Li et al. 2013), protein contents in wheat (Edae et al. 2014;Wang et al. 2014) and essential micronutrients such as a-tocopherol (vitamin E) and b-carotene in maize (Harjes et al. 2008;Li et al. 2012;Lipka et al. 2013;Yan et al. 2010). In particular, two key carotenoid biosynthesis genes, namely LCYE and crtRB1 (HYD3), have been found to be significantly associated with accumulation of provitamin A carotenoids in maize endosperm (Harjes et al. 2008;Yan et al. 2010). Different allelic variants of these genes can affect the flux of substrates through the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway leading to synthesis of higher levels of provitamin A carotenoids (e.g., b-carotene). The total provitamin A carotenoid proportion in maize endosperm is affected by the level of total carotenoids accumulated in the endosperm which is a function of substrate flux into the carotenoid pathway and downstream catabolic steps involving degradation of carotenoids (Rodríguez-Concepción 2010;Vallabhaneni et al. 2010) There have been only a few GWA studies for carotenoid composition and content in maize endosperm to date (Owens et al. 2014;Suwarno et al. 2015). In our study, we have used a GBS-based GWA approach to identify loci associated with carotenoid content and composition of maize endosperm. Uniquely, our study used a collection of genetically diverse yellow maize inbred lines (with a mixed genetic background of both tropical and temperate germplasm) developed by the maize breeding program of the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). In addition, we factored in the effect of already identified provitamin A alleles as covariates to detect additional association signals. Our findings contribute to ongoing efforts to identify allelic variants that can be used for genomic selection to develop maize lines with higher levels of provitamin A carotenoids.A panel of 130 diverse yellow maize inbred lines previously described in Azmach et al. (2013) was employed for the GWAS. This panel had inbred lines with kernel colors ranging from light yellow to dark orange. White maize lines were not included, since our focus was to investigate the genetic variability underlying composition and content of the various carotenoids in maize endosperm. We did not investigate the variation between white and yellow lines, which is largely determined by a mutation in the psy1 locus (Palaisa et al. 2003). This maize germplasm panel was composed of inbred lines developed by IITA from eight bi-parental crosses, four broad based populations, and 28 backcrosses of tropical inbred lines, involving five temperate lines as donors of high b-carotene alleles (Azmach et al. 2013). The inbred lines were considered to represent the allelic diversity underlying the variation in carotenoid composition and content in both the temperate and tropical maize gene pools, since each line contained both tropical and temperate maize germplasm in its genetic background.Field trial evaluation of the maize inbred lines was performed at IITA's research station, Ibadan, Nigeria (7°29911.99$N, 3°5492.88$E, altitude 190 m above sea level) for two seasons, in 2010 and 2011. The trial was arranged in (10,13) alpha-lattice design with two replications. Each line was planted in a 5 m row plot, with 0.75 m spacing between rows and 0.25 m within each row. The fields were managed as per the recommended agronomic practices (Menkir et al. 2008) which included fertilization at the rates of 60 kg N, 60 kg P, and 60 kg K ha 1 at the time of sowing, with an additional 60 kg N ha 1 applied as top dressing 4 wk later; plus weed control using Primextra and Gramazone herbicides applied as pre-emergence herbicides each at 5 liter ha 1 . Subsequent manual weeding was done to keep the trials weed-free. The environmental conditions during the first season were as follows: Total rainfall of 310 mm (supplemented with irrigation); temperature ranged from 19.4 to 33.8°with average 27.7°; relative humidity ranged 28-97% with average 67%; and solar radiation ranged from 19.4 to 21.2 MJ/m 2 /d. During the second season the total rainfall was 1022.5 mm; the temperature ranged from 21.7 to 32.4°with average 25.8°; the relative humidity ranged from 40 to 97% with average 78%; and the solar radiation was from 15.2 to 20.2 MJ/m 2 /d. The dominant soil type of the trial site is Ferric Lixisols (FAO 1991), which is a sandy loam soil, moderately drained with a PH of 6.2.Seed samples for carotenoid analysis were generated by controlled self-pollination of all plants in each plot. The self-pollination protocol employed consisted of covering the shoots with shoot bags before emergence of the silks to avoid cross pollination, once the shoots were ready for pollination, the tassels were bagged with pollination bags a day before pollination. The next day fresh pollen was collected and applied on the silks of the same plant using the pollination bags, after which the shoots were covered with the same bag used for self-pollination. The shoots remained bagged until harvesting. The ears of each self-pollinated maize line in each plot were harvested, dried under ambient temperature with minimal exposure to direct sunlight, and separately shelled. Samples of 100 kernels were used from each seed lot for carotenoid analysis.The carotenoids from kernel samples of each of the 130 maize inbred lines were extracted and quantified with HPLC at the University of Wisconsin, USA. The extraction protocol used was the method of Howe and Tanumihardjo (2006) for carotenoid analysis of dried maize kernels, as previously described in Azmach et al. (2013). Extraction was performed using finely ground 0.5 g samples of each inbred line's kernels. The internal standard consisted of 200 ml of b-Apo-8'-carotenal (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), which was added at the beginning of the analysis for calibrating losses of carotenoids during extraction and the entire work-flow process. Fifty microliter aliquots of each extract were injected into the HPLC system (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA). The gradient was applied for 30 min from 70% solvent A:30% solvent B, to 40% solvent A:60% solvent B. Each carotenoid type was quantified based on calibrations using its respective external standard. Total carotenoid content was calculated as the sum of concentrations of a-carotene, lutein, b-carotene, b-cryptoxanthin, zeaxanthin. Provitamin A was calculated by summing the concentrations of b-carotene, and half concentrations of each of b-cryptoxanthin and a-carotene, since b-cryptoxanthin and a-carotene can provide only one molecule of retinol each as opposed to two molecules of retinol for b-carotene (US Institute of Medicine 2001). Other derived carotenoid traits were also calculated as indicated in Harjes et al. (2008), Yan et al. (2010): i.e., ratio of carotenoids in b to a branch of the carotenoid pathway, ratio of b-carotene to b-cryptoxanthin and ratio of b-carotene to all carotenoids (b-carotene + a-carotene + lutein + zeaxanthin + b-cryptoxanthin). The data for the ratio traits were transformed using natural logarithm (log e ) before being subjected to statistical analysis to correct for the non-normal distribution of the data. All carotenoid concentrations were measured in microgram/gram dry weight (DW). BLUEs (best linear unbiased estimates) calculated for each trait based on the two season carotenoid data were used in the GWAS. BLUEs were calculated using the GLM option of TASSEL software version 4 (Bradbury et al. 2007) with a statistical model Y = Xb + e, where Y is matrix of the dependent or response variables, i.e., each carotenoid type; X is the design matrix; b is vector of fixed effect parameters, and e is vector of the random errors that are assumed to be normally distributed and independent of the other variances.Genome wide SNP marker generation using GBS DNA samples were isolated from freeze-dried leaf samples of each inbred line using Qiagen DNeasy plant mini kit following the protocol supplied with the product. DNA samples were quantified using a NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer. Samples having at least 10 ng/ml DNA each were prepared and sent to the Genome Diversity Facility (GDF), formerly Institute for Genomic Diversity (IGD), Cornel University, USA, for GBS genotyping. Genotyping by sequencing (GBS) libraries were prepared, analyzed and sequenced at GDF, according to Elshire et al. (2011). SNP calling from the sequenced GBS library was also performed at GDF using the GBS production pipeline (Version: 3.0.134), an extension of the Java program TASSEL (Bradbury et al. 2007;Glaubitz et al. 2014) which used aligned short reads of GBS (tags). The GBS pipeline options used for calling SNPs consisted of: 0.1 minimum locus coverage, 1 • 10 6 maximum number of SNPs per chromosome, duplicate SNPs above 0.05 mismatch rate were not merged, and 0.8 cutoff frequency between heterozygote vs. homozygote calls. Tags were aligned to the reference genome B73 refgen_v2 (Schnable et al. 2009).The GBS pipeline generated a data set containing a total of 619,596 unfiltered SNPs. This SNP dataset had a total of 51% missing data points possibly caused by biological presence-absence of sequences between the reference and each test genome, or errors introduced in the GBS procedures (Glaubitz et al. 2014;Poland and Rife 2012). The dataset was further filtered in TASSEL 4 on the basis of missing data proportion and minor allele frequency (MAF) cutoff thresholds (Bradbury et al. 2007). The cutoff thresholds used to filter the dataset for the GWAS allowed only those SNPs showing a maximum of 20% missing data, and 1% minimum MAF (MMAF). This resulted in a dataset of 109,937 SNPs. The diversity and genome-wide Linkage Disequilibrium (LD) analysis were performed using datasets obtained by filtering with criteria of no missing data points and 1 and 10% MAFs which resulted in 3532 and 1658 genome-wide SNPs, respectively. SNP data summary and basic diversity parameters were calculated using TASSEL 4 (Bradbury et al. 2007) and PowerMarker 3.25 (Liu and Muse 2005) softwares.The two commonly used measures of LD are Lewontin's D and the squared pairwise correlation coefficient R 2 (Chen et al. 2006;Flint-Garcia et al. 2003). Although D' is a good measure of recombination history, it is severely affected with reduced sample size. R 2 summarizes both recombination and mutation history (Flint-Garcia et al. 2003). In our study, LD was estimated using R 2 , since it helps detect LD with minimal error despite small sample size and low MAF (Khatkar et al. 2008;Yan et al. 2009). In addition R 2 is a more relevant measure of LD for conducting association analysis between genotype and traits (Flint-Garcia et al. 2003).To determine the degree of resolution achieved in the association analysis (Yu and Buckler 2006), both genome and chromosome wide linkage disequilibrium (LD) were estimated using the squared allele frequency correlation coefficient (R 2 ) for all possible pairs of SNPs in a dataset. For genome-wide LD, SNP datasets of the 10 maize chromosomes were combined and filtered with cutoff threshold of no missing data and 10% MMAFs yielding 1658 SNPs typed across all inbred lines. On the other hand, LD estimation within each chromosome was performed using the SNP data of each chromosome filtered at 10% maximum missing data per marker and 10% MMAFs. Missing data in all the SNP datasets used for chromosome wide LD analysis were not imputed. The software used to estimate LD was TASSEL 3 (Bradbury et al. 2007), which uses permutation tests to determine the P-values for each pairwise correlation. LD estimate significance levels were considered at a = 0.001 (Pasam et al. 2012). Genome-wide and chromosome wide rate of LD decays were estimated by plotting localized regression curves (LOESS) of the R 2 values vs. the corresponding physical distances between the SNP pairs, followed by observation of the intersection point between the fitted LOESS curve and a critical R 2 values (Cleveland and Devlin 1988;Breseghello and Sorrells 2006). Two background critical R 2 values for estimating LD decays within and across chromosomes were considered in the present study to offer comparison. The first baseline critical R 2 was determined by taking the parametric 95 percentile of distribution of R 2 values for unlinked SNPs, taking SNPs on different chromosomes and SNPs beyond 50 Mbp apart on the same chromosome as unlinked (Breseghello and Sorrells 2006;Pasam et al. 2012). The second baseline R 2 value was 0.2, an arbitrary value often used to describe LD decay (Zhu et al. 2008). Scatter plots and fitted smooth curves for estimating LD decay were plotted using a base scatter plot function of R version 3.0.3, \"scatter.smooth\" (R Core Team 2014). The function plots and adds a smooth curve to a scatter plot computed according to LOESS (R Core Team 2014). LD patterns of all SNPs significantly associated with carotenoids and local LD patterns in regions surrounding significant genes were visualized using LD plots generated with HaploView (Barrett et al. 2005).Associations between genome-wide SNPs and carotenoid content was identified using the R (R Core Team 2014) package GAPIT (Genetic Association and Prediction Integrated Tools) (Lipka et al. 2012(Lipka et al. , 2013)). GAPIT package uses a unified mixed linear model (MLM) to calculate genome-wide association between traits and large number of markers by employing methodologies that maximize statistical power, provide high prediction accuracy, and run in a computationally efficient manner (Kang et al. 2010;Lipka et al. 2012Lipka et al. , 2013;;Yu et al. 2006;Zhang et al. 2010). A unified MLM incorporates both population structure (Q) and relative kinship (K) inferred from marker data into the GWAS to control for the confounding effect of Q and K and thus minimize spurious associations due to both type I and type II errors (Yu et al. 2006). Since the panel used in this study was composed of groups of inbred lines that were extracted from many backcrosses and single crosses involving diverse parental germplasm, multiple level relative kinship and non-random population structure was expected. Thus, the unified MLM model was applied to compute accurate associations. The analysis was executed mainly with the default settings of the software which automatically calculated both K and Q using the entire SNP marker data. The default setting implements VanRaden's algorithm option (VanRaden 2008) to calculate the K matrix, and uses principal component analysis (PCA) to define Q. It applies optimum compression levels using default kinship clustering and grouping values \"average\" and \"mean,\" respectively. The model selection option was used to estimate the optimum number of principal components (PC) covariates using Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) (Schwarz 1978).n Table 1 The variation explained for a trait by the model and a particular SNP in question were determined using the likelihood R 2 statistics calculated in GAPIT. SNP data used for GWAS was filtered in TASSEL 4 with maximum missing data of 20% and MMAF of 1%. Missing data were imputed automatically within GAPIT using the conservative option of \"major allele,\" which replaces missing data points with the major allele of the SNP. Different significance cut-off thresholds were used to assess the effect of the SNPs on carotenoids. The statistical significances of the SNPs were evaluated at 5 and 1% critical thresholds of the false discovery rate (FDR) adjusted P-values (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995) and the Bonferroni procedure was used to control the experimentwise type I error rate at both a = 0.05 and a = 0.01. FDR values generated with the GWAS result in GAPIT were used.Variations in carotenoid content and composition of the association panel caused by allelic variants in the two genes, lcyE (Harjes et al. 2008) and crtRB1 (Yan et al. 2010) were accounted for by including marker score data of the three allele-specific markers of each gene as covariates. These marker data were scored in the same inbred line panel used in the current study to validate the allele specific markers by Azmach et al. (2013). To incorporate these markers into the GWAS the six allele specific marker data were first transformed to principal components. Components explaining the largest proportion of the variation were then included as covariates in the unified mixed model for calculating the second GWA using GAPIT.The genotype and phenotype data for this GWAS population are available in Supplemental Material, File S1 (hapmap file containing GBS generated SNP data for the 130 maize inbred lines, filtered with maximum of 20% missing data and 1% minimum allele frequency) and File S2 (an excel file containing BLUEs of carotenoid contents for the 130 maize inbred lines).The carotenoid composition and content of maize lines used for this GWA study has been described in Azmach et al. (2013). The panel displayed considerable diversity in carotenoid profile. The ranges of least square means of the carotenoid concentrations (over two growing seasons) are presented in Table S3 in File S3 (can also be referred in detail in Azmach et al. (2013)). The BLUEs of the carotenoids are available in File S1. The concentration of a-carotene was low across the inbred lines, with poor repeatability, and hence a-carotene was not included in the GWA study.The summary of the 110 k SNP data set used for the GWAS and its diversity parameters are presented in Table 1. The average missing data for this data set was 10%. SNP distribution across the genome was not uniform but attained significant coverage (Figure S1). The MAF displayed a uniform distribution across the 10 maize chromosomes n Table 3 (average = 0.13-0.14, median = 0.06-0.8). The rare allele frequencies (,0.05) represented the largest proportion of the MAFs (Figure S2).The average inbreeding coefficient (f) estimates per locus ranged from below zero to one, while the genome-wide mean f was 0.82. a Representative significant SNPs selected based on their positions and approximate LD decay. Significant SNPs were selected at FDR 1%, except for chromosome 8 SNPs associated with lutein -which were selected only at Bonferroni 1%. For zeaxanthin and total provitamin A the threshold was set at 5% FDR to be able to detect significant SNPs. Some SNPs may appear two to four times as they were associated with multiple related traits. and f had more or less uniform values across the chromosomes. The genome-wide polymorphic information content (PIC) of the SNPs ranged from 0.02 to 0.38, while the average was 0.18. PIC is one of the diversity parameters that is used to measure the informativeness of genetic markers. A large proportion (.40%) of SNPs used for diversity analyses in this study had PIC values higher than 0.2, suggesting informativeness of the GBS generated SNPs for the association study.The Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC) suggested the population structure calculated (based on PCA) had only a small contribution to the variation in carotenoid profile of the panel (Table S2 in File S3). The kinship heat map indicated a low level of overall relatedness in the panel (Figure S3). The genome-wide extent of LD estimate was 0.83 Mbp at baseline R 2 = 0.2 and 0.65 Mbp at R 2 = 0.25 (Figure S4, Supplemental Information in File S3, and Table 1). There was heterogeneous distribution of LD decay across the genome, as was evident from the pattern of LD heat-map generated using the same SNP dataset (Figure 1).Of the 110 k SNPs tested, 386 unique significant SNPs were detected at 5% FDR (Table 2). At this significance threshold, at least two significant SNPs were identified on each of the 10 chromosomes. The number of significant SNPs declined to 168 at 1% FDR correction rate, discarding all the significant SNPs on chromosomes 1, 5 and 7. Application of the conservative multiple comparison correction term, the Bonferroni test, at 5 and 1% levels further reduced the number of significant SNPs to 81 and 32, respectively. The vast majority of significant SNPs were found on chromosome 8 followed by chromosome 10, which were mainly associated with lutein and b-branch carotenoids, respectively. Except for significant SNPs on chromosome 6 and 9, the average MAFs of the significant SNPs at FDR 1 and 5% were above 10%. Only 5% of the significant SNPs at FDR 1% had their MAFs below 10% (Figure 1). The number of significant SNPs in relation to each carotenoid across each chromosome is summarized in Table 3. The allelic variants and effects selected for the most significant SNPs in the GWAS are indicated in Table 4, while the associated candidate protein coding genes along with their genomic positions are listed in Table 5. Figure 2 illustrates the GWAS result for each carotenoid trait, complemented by Figure S5 which summarizes the association using the lowest P-values attained at 5% FDR threshold. The strongest association was detected for lutein content. At the significance level of 1% FDR, a total of 129 SNPs distributed on chromosomes 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 9 were associated with lutein levels, with the largest fraction of SNPs (.90%) located on chromosome 8. The most significant SNPs associated with this carotenoid scored the lowest of all the P-value (SNPs S8_138938983 and S8_138938949, P = 9.81E212). The model containing each of these SNPs explained 53% of the variation in accumulation of this carotenoid. The majority of significant SNPs that survived the stringent significance threshold of 1% Bonferroni were also associated with lutein (27 SNPs on chromosome 8). Many of these SNPs were also associated with the ratio of ato b-branch carotenoids at FDR 5%. The second most significant association was detected for the ratio of b-carotene to b-cryptoxanthin derived carotenoid trait. Twenty six SNPs were associated with this derived trait at FDR 1%, the most significant SNP (S10_136007578) scoring P-value of 6.75E210 and R 2 of 60%.Using the Bonferroni approach to adjust the family-wise type I error rate at a = 0.01, 13 SNPs on chromosome 10 were associated with carotenoids of the b branch and some of the derived ratio traits (b-carotene, b-cryptoxanthin, b-carotene to b-cryptoxanthin and/or b-carotene to zeaxanthin). The ratio of a to b branch carotenoid was significantly affected by 10 SNPs on chromosome 8 at FDR 5%, the most significant SNPs in the group accounting for 33 and 36% of the variations in the derived trait, respectively. These SNPs were also significantly associated with lutein.Associations with zeaxanthin (12 SNPs) and provitamin A (3 SNPs) could only be detected when relaxing the significance cutoff threshold to 5% FDR. The variances explained by the model involving the most significant SNPs were 33% for zeaxanthin (SNP S10_136840488, P = 5.53E207) and 51% for provitamin A (SNP S10_134601800, P = 6.39E207). These SNPs were also associated with b-carotene and its derived ratio traits.The genomic locations of significant SNPs were investigated to identify what protein-coding genes the SNPs were located in or adjacent to, zooming in based on SNP data retrieved from online databases for maize genome (http://www.maizegdb.org/ and http://ensembl.gramene.org/ Zea_mays/). The list of all annotated genes, including those encoding uncharacterized proteins, within circa 0.8 Mb of the most significant SNPs are presented in Table S4 in File S3. Here only those candidate genes the closest to the most significant SNPs listed in Table 5 are described.The most significant SNP in the association signal for lutein content 16 Mbp on chromosome 8 (SNP S8_16743428, P-value = 8.65E209) was located within a putative gene GRMZM2G143211 (Figure 3a). This gene model contains a WD domain and displays sequence similarity to the yeast autophagy 18 (AtATG18) gene class in Arabidopsis thaliana. Two additional significant SNPs (S8_16444572 and S8_16444587) in this region were located within another candidate gene GRMZM2G380414, which encodes a protein called Ultraviolet-B-repressible which is likely involved in photosynthesis. The association peak between 110 and 144 Mbp on the same chromosome for the same trait contained three highly significant SNPs, namely S8_111289041 (P-value = 5.82E209); S8_124434722 (P-value = 3.97E210), and S8_138938949/S8_138938983 (P-value = 9.81E212) that were in strong LD to one another, with R 2 value ranging from 0.31 to 0.67 (Figure 4). These SNPs were located within three different protein-coding putative genes GRMZM2G333079, GRMZM2G330693 and GRMZM2G463133, respectively with the first and third genes having some evidence of expression in maize endosperm (Sekhon et al. 2011). The two SNPs, S8_138938949 and S8_138938983, are 50 kb distal from one of the major carotenoid biosynthesis genes, lcyE. Pairwise LD among these highly significant SNPs on chromosome 8 varied from R 2 = 0.23 to 0.67 (Figure 4).On chromosome 10, the strong association peak surrounding the 138 Mbp region for b-carotene (Figure 2 and Figure 3b) contained two closely spaced and significant SNPs S10_136007575 and S10_136007578, P = 6.75E210. These SNPs are the closest significant SNPs to the major candidate gene of carotenoid crtRB1 (40 kb distal), but are physically located within a putative RING zinc finger domain protein coding gene, GRMZM2G397684 (Figure 3b). The other significant SNPs in this region were S10_134650981 (P-value = 1.99E208) and S10_139877594 (Pvalue = 5.12E208), residing within candidate genes GRMZM2G018314 and GRMZM2G080516, respectively. The latter encodes an AP2-EREBP transcription factor which is expressed in maize seed endosperm (Sekhon et al. 2011). LD among the peak SNPs on chromosome 10 ranged from 0 between SNPs S10_134650981 and S10_139877594, to 1, between SNPs S10_136007575 and S10_136007578 (Figure 4).A smallbut significant SNP association was detected on the short arm of chromosome 2 coinciding with a gene involved in the conversion of carotenoids to abscisic acid, namely zeaxanthin epoxidase 1 (ZEP1, GRMZM2G127139). Two of the six SNPs that were significantly associated with total carotenoids at FDR 5% (S2_44448438, P = 1.11E206) and S2_44448432 P = 1.11E206) were physically located within the ZEP1 gene (Figure 3c). However, the most significant SNP, S2_44473758, P = 1.78E207, was located circa 33 kb downstream of the ZEP1 gene within another protein-coding gene GRMZM2G062559 that encodes an uncharacterized protein. All of these SNPs were in high LD forming a haplotype block (Figure 4) when considered without the non-significant SNPs in the region. We consider that the significant effect most likely arises from ZEP1 (or some of these SNPs could be linked with regulatory regions or control elements). The other SNP on the same chromosome around position 139 Mbp that showed a strong association with total carotenoid (S2_139644276, P-value = 2.53E207) was located in a putative gene GRMZM2G066213 (Figure 3c).Strong and extensive pairwise LD was observed among the significant SNPs selected at 1% FDR (Figure 5a and Table 6). Seventy percent of the pairwise comparison among the SNPs led to statistically significant LD (P , 0.001) of which 21% was comprised of inter-chromosomal correlations. LD for within chromosome Figure 5 LD plots of significant SNPs and LD blocks surrounding the genes lcyE, crtRB1 and ZEP1. (a) LD plot of all significant SNPs selected at FDR 1%. Labels 2, 3, 4, 8 and 10 refer to the chromosomes of the SNPs that reached significance at this threshold; (b) an LD block on chromosome 2 surrounding the gene ZEP1; (c) an LD block on chromosome 8 surrounding the gene lcyE; (d) an LD block on chromosome 10 comprising the gene crtRB1; (e) LD plots that included non-significant SNPs in regions +/2 of crtRB1, lcyE and ZEP1 where significant associations were detected. Haplotype blocks were defined with the option of confidence interval (Gabriel et al. 2002). Green highlighted SNPs are the closest SNPs to the carotenoid genes indicated, with the most significant ones enclosed with oval shapes. The grayscale shading pattern of LD plot reflects the strength of linkage as it increases from the lightest to the darkest shaded cells paralleling the range of no LD (R 2 = 0%) to absolute LD (R 2 = 100%). Plots generated using HaploView software (Barrett et al. 2005).comparisons ranged from 0.37 to 1, both on chromosome 3, with genome-wide average of 0.42. For inter-chromosomal comparisons, LD ranged from 0.18 in chromosome 10 to 0.5 in chromosome 3, with a genome-wide average of 0.25. Significant SNPs on chromosomes 3 and 4 displayed strong inter-chromosomal LD with those on chromosome 8, but was negligible for SNPs on chromosome 10. The confidence interval algorithm deployed in HaploView software generated 11 haplotype blocks based on LD of the significant SNPs on chromosome 8, five blocks for those on chromosome 10 and one block for those on chromosome 2. Haplotype blocks were identified for each of the three carotenoid genes crtRB1, lcyE and ZEP1 when analyzing the significant SNPs in regions surrounding their corresponding genomic locations. Further analysis of LD for regions comprising these three genes, with the inclusion of non-significant SNPs revealed heterogeneous LD. This suggests that the LD among the significant SNPs residing in regions of these major genes could be functional, rather than tight genetic linkage occurring as a result of long range average LD decay in the association panel.GWA re-calculated with the allele specific markers of crtRB1 and lcyE included as covariates GWA was re-calculated by incorporating the allele specific markers of the two genes lcyE and crtRB1 as additional fixed effect covariates in the MLM model. As expected, the number of SNPs significantly associated with the traits in this analysis was drastically reduced from 386 in the previous analysis to 38 SNPs (excluding the four SNPs significant at 10% FDR), at a cut-off threshold of 5% FDR (Table 7). Numerous SNPs on chromosome 8 and 10 previously associated with lutein and b-carotene (plus its derived traits) became statistically non-significant, even at a lower significance threshold of 10% FDR (Figure 6 and Table 7). Using this approach, chromosome 10 was devoid of significant SNPs, and only two SNPs on chromosome 8 (SNP S8_138938949 and S8_138938983) were strongly associated with lutein (P-value = 7.66E208; R 2 = 0.53). These SNPs were also the most significant SNPs in the initial GWAS result. The SNPs were physically located within a putative gene GRMZM2G463133 encoding an HLH binding domain protein. Since these two SNPs were in high LD with SNPs in the lcyE region (Figure 5c), it is possible that the significant effect arises from linkage to this known carotenoid biosynthesis gene. However, functional studies would be required to unequivocally ascribe the significant effect to these SNPs.On the other hand, the re-run GWAS detected new significant associations on chromosome 5 for b-carotene and provitamin A. In particular, SNPs S5_78384689 and S5_78427240 were associated with provitamin A at 5% FDR (P-value = 1.81E207; R 2 = 68) and one of these SNPs S5_78384689, was associated with b-carotene at 10% FDR (P-value= 7.08E207; R 2 0 = 81). The SNP S5_78384689 lay within an auxin-response factor 20 gene (GRMZM2G102845, 5:78,381,834-78,389,884, Table 5). In addition, seven SNPs on chromosome 2 were significantly associated with zeaxanthin content at FDR 1% (Table 7). Three of the zeaxanthin associated SNPs (44,473,748, S2_44473758, and S2_44473801) were located within the gene ZEP1 while the other two were located 23 kb upstream of the ZEP1 gene.Genome-wide and candidate-gene based association studies are powerful approaches to identify nucleotide variants that functionally underlie important agronomic and nutritional traits. Such nucleotide variants can be harnessed in breeding programs to develop improved cultivars through marker-or genomics-assisted selection (Babu et al. 2013;Hamblin et al. 2011). Association mapping using large population sizes and high marker densities can be used for successful and reliable prediction of LD and associations between alleles and target phenotypes (Yu and Buckler 2006;Khatkar et al. 2008;Zhu et al. 2008).As a major staple crop, maize has been the focus of both candidate gene and GWA studies for a number of agriculturally and nutritionally significant phenotypes (Cook et al. 2012;Li et al. 2012Li et al. , 2013;;Lipka et al. 2013;Yan et al. 2010;Yu and Buckler 2006). In our GWA study, we have used a panel of 130 diverse and partially related inbred lines of maize where we have used genome-wide GBS to generate a highly-dense SNP map for association analyses. Our use of inbred lines combining the genomes of both temperate and tropical maize germplasm has allowed us to capture small to large effect carotenoid allelic variants that are present in the two gene pools within IITA's maize breeding program.Despite its predisposition to large levels of missing data (Heslot et al. 2013), GBS generates large number of SNPs with dense coverage and potentially less ascertainment bias, which is ideal for consistent GWAS (Crossa et al. 2013;Elshire et al. 2011). The SNP data set used in our GWA study had acceptable level of missing data of only 10% (which was predicted with conservative imputation criteria in GAPIT genetic analysis software to allow reliable genome-wide associations). A minimum MAF criteria of 1% was used to filter out potential spurious SNPs stemming from sequencing error (Glaubitz et al. 2014).The frequency of minor alleles is an important factor that can affect the accuracy of LD analysis and GWAS especially when using small samples (Tabangin et al. 2009;Yan et al. 2009). The filtered data set had a large proportion of MAFs distributed uniformly across the genome, frequencies ranging between 1 and 5% accounting for the largest proportion. However, the MAFs of the vast majority of the significant SNPs were above 10% which might be indicative of the positive detection power of the GWAS as the biasness associated with rare alleles when using small sized samples for association mapping was eliminated (Schnable et al. 2009). This could suggest that alleles associated with carotenoid content and composition may be segregating in our panel at frequencies higher than 10% (Hamblin et al. 2011).The average genome-wide LD decay in our study was estimated at circa. 830 kbp at a background critical R 2 = 0.2. Previous studies in maize reported LD extent to be ,1000 bp for maize landraces, .2000 bp for diverse breeding lines, and 100 kb for commercial elite inbred lines (Yu and Buckler 2006). Although it can lack the power for high precision mapping, a mapping panel with persistent LD can be considered ideal, if low-resolution mapping is targeted (Flint-Garcia et al. 2003). The long range LD in this panel was expected since such extensive LD is characteristics of advanced maize inbred lines that have experienced strong recent selection (Yu and Buckler 2006). Also, small populations are prone to genetic drift leading to loss of rare alleles and increased LD (Flint-Garcia et al. 2003). Nonetheless, there was considerable localized variation in LD structure across the genome suggesting that the map-ping resolution also vary. The extensive LD in our study could lead to the identification of SNPs in genes that are either causal or contributory to the carotenoid phenotype, or which act as linked markers associated with the carotenoid phenotype.The two MLM GWAS models we employed detected a number of small to large effect known carotenoid biosynthesis genes, as well as several putative genes encoding characterized or uncharacterized proteins. The first MLM GWAS considered population structure (Q) and relative kinship (K) only, while the second incorporated the allele specific markers of lcyE and crtRB1 major carotenoid genes as additional fixed effect covariates. The identification of known carotenoid biosynthesis genes in our study indicates that our study had sufficient power to identify causal or contributory genes.The vast majority of highly significant hits in the first GWAS were on chromosome 8 associated with lutein, followed by chromosome 4, and Table 5). The large effects of these genes on carotenoids within the maize panel used in our study were expected, as the markers designed to detect the allelic variants of these genes were previously confirmed (Harjes et al. 2008;Yan et al. 2010) to have significant impact in the same mapping panel (Azmach et al. 2013), indicating the successful introgression of the favorable alleles of these two genes into the tropical yellow maize genetic background. While the most significant SNP (P = 9.81E212; Table 4 and Table 5) on chromosome 8 was located 49 kb downstream of the lcyE gene, another significant SNP (SNP: S8_138888278, P = 3.19E28) was detected within the gene 1 kb upstream of the 39indel functional polymorphism that was previously reported by Harjes et al. (2008). Despite no SNP was found within the gene crtRB1, the closest SNPs (S10_136007575 and S10_136007578) significantly associated with b-carotene to b-cryptoxanthin ratio (P-value = 6.75E210) and other ratio involving b-carotene were located 50 kb upstream of this gene.The inclusion of the allele-specific marker information for lcyE and crtRB1 as additional fixed effect covariate allowed to control for the large effects of the two genes. Using this approach, 10% of the significant SNPs detected at 5% FDR in the first GWAS survived the correction for the allele specific markers. The two most significant SNPs on chromosome 8 detected in the first GWAS still displayed a strong association with lutein levels, which could be due to a stronger LD of the SNPs with larger-effect functional polymorphisms in the 39TE untranslated region of lcyE not captured with the present genotyping and possibly different from the polymorphisms previously described by Harjes et al. (2008). This could explain the relatively low effect of the known allele-specific markers of lcyE in our previous marker validation study (Azmach et al. 2013), although the strongest association was still detected in this gene region in our GWA study.The controlling of the effects of lcyE and crtRB1 in the GWAS including marker covariates led to the detection of significant associations for zeaxanthin levels on chromosome 2 at 1% FDR. The significant SNPs co-localized with a known downstream carotenoid biosynthesis gene ZEP1 (chromosome 2: 44,440,449,237). These SNPs were detected in the first MLM GWAS, but they were then significantly associated with total carotenoid content at a 5% FDR. In the GWAS without covariates, zeaxanthin was significantly affected by SNPs only from the large association signal detected on chromosome 10. This could suggest that increases or decreases in the rate of conversion of b-carotene to zeaxanthin through b-cryptoxanthin may be more pronounced than that of decreases in the rate of conversion of zeaxanthin to violaxanthin by ZEP1 in the maize inbred line panel used in our study. This would provide a reason for the greater impact of crtRB1 on the level of zeaxanthin than ZEP 1. This could be interpreted as a scenario where reduced function of crtRB1 leads to accumulation of b-carotene at the expense of zeaxanthin synthesis, reflecting the larger effect of crtRB1 on the concentration of zeaxanthin.Indeed, recent association studies have reported similar associations of SNPs within the gene ZEP1 with zeaxanthin content (Owens et al. 2014;Suwarno 2012). In addition a small effect QTL underlying kernel color close to the gene ZEP1 has also been reported and suggested as a target for allele mining by Chandler et al. (2013). This locus can therefore be considered as one of the loci potentially contributing to the variation in total carotenoid in the mapping panel used in this study and can be the next target gene for allele mining. Allele-combinations of ZEP1 and other genes in the biosynthesis pathway can be used in breeding programs to increase accumulation of provitamin A and total carotenoid in maize endosperm.Our GWAS including marker covariates also identified an association between SNPs on chromosome 5 and provitamin A at 5% FDR and b-carotene at 10% FDR. These SNPs were co-localized with a gene encoding an auxin-response factor 20 (arf20) protein (5:78,381,834-78,389,884). Auxin-response factors are transcription factors that target auxin response DNA elements (AuxRE) in the promoters of auxinregulated genes (Li et al. 2016). The key enzymes involved in carotenoid biosynthesis in cereals are well known and have been previously reviewed; e.g., figure 1 in Zhai et al. (2016). This family of transcription factors is known to have a role in conditioning carotenoid biosynthesis through coordinated regulation of transcription of genes involved in the pathway (Meier et al. 2011). As the ARF20 gene is highly expressed in the maize endosperm (Sekhon et al. 2011), the gene may constitute a novel target for further unraveling of the regulatory mechanism of carotenoid biosynthesis in maize endosperm.Using a panel of IITA's tropical maize inbred lines that incorporated high b-carotene alleles introgressed from a temperate maize germplasm, our study detected SNPs co-localizing with known major and small effect carotenoid biosynthesis genes, demonstrating the detection power of our GWA analyses. In addition, a number of associations were detected for novel candidate genes encoding transcription factors, which might have roles in regulation of the carotenoid biosynthesis in maize endosperm. As our study is based on IITA's tropical maize breeding program, it can contribute to transitioning of the maize biofortification efforts of the breeding program toward molecular-marker assisted approaches. Our findings pave the way for additional allele mining efforts and greater understanding of the genes involved in regulation of expression of carotenoid biosynthesis genes, which is necessary to further exploit the genetic potential of maize in accumulating provitamin A in maize endosperm.","tokenCount":"7474"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0082903694.json b/data/part_2/0082903694.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a51644a68d81beb4c45e2c7edbe789681c5ae409 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0082903694.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"77efea2d443c4bd1356f4a3e7316ec39","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/f2dc7f60-68b1-4ad3-afa5-14c5ac443fad/retrieve","id":"713993260"},"keywords":["TSBF-CIAT's achievements and reflections","2002-2005. Cali","CO : Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT); Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility (TSBF) Institute","2006. 95 p. --(CIAT publication no. 350) ISBN 978-958-694-088-7 AGROVOC descriptors in English: 1. Soil fertility. 2. Soil management. 3. Cropping systems. 4. Soil biology. 5. Soil organic matter. 6. Genetic resources. 7. Land management. 8. Socioeconomic environment. 9. Water management. 10. Capacity building. 11. Sustainability. 12. Organization AGRIS subject category: P35 Soil fertility / Fertilidad del suelo LC classification: S 596 .7 P7"],"sieverID":"3199f4f6-310e-4bb5-b8a2-2d0c171b38b3","pagecount":"101","content":"CIAT encourages wide dissemination of its printed and electronic publications for maximum public benefit. Thus, in most cases colleagues working in research and development should feel free to use CIAT materials for noncommercial purposes. However, the Center prohibits modification of these materials, and we expect to receive due credit. Though CIAT prepares its publications with considerable care, the Center does not guarantee their accuracy and completeness.The Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Programme (TSBF) was founded in 1984 to develop capacity for soil biology as a research discipline in the tropical regions, and to conduct research on the role of soil biology in maintaining or improving soil fertility and combating environmental degradation, on the premise that biological management of soil fertility is an essential component of sustainable agricultural development.In 1997, the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT, or Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical) created a soils team in Latin America to focus on identification of strategic principles, concepts and methods for protecting and improving soil quality through the efficient and sustainable use of soil, water and nutrient resources in crop-pasture-fallow systems in tropical savannas and hillsides agroecosystems.In December 2001, an agreement between CIAT and the TSBF Programme led to the latter's becoming an institute of CIAT (TSBF-CIAT). Today, the Institute operates as an integral part of the CIAT research programme, and the TSBF Director reports to the CIAT Director General. TSBF-CIAT staff are located in two major target areas in the tropics (Africa and Latin America), with the directorate housed on the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) campus in Nairobi, Kenya.The 2005-2010 TSBF-CIAT strategy is aligned with the Millennium Development goal: \"to help create an expanded vision of development that vigorously promotes human development as the key to sustaining social and economic progress in all countries, and recognizes the importance of creating a global partnership for development.\" The strategy also encompasses the CGIAR's agricultural and environment mission: \"to contribute to food security and poverty alleviation in developing countries through research, partnerships, capacity building and policy support, promoting sustainable agricultural development based on environmental sound management of natural resources.\" The strategy is also aligned with CIAT's three Development Challenges: (1) Enhancing and Sharing the Benefits of Agrobiodiversity, (2) Improving the Management of Agroecosystems in the Tropics and (3) Enhancing Rural Innovation.TSBF-CIAT's programme goals are: to strengthen national and international capacity to manage tropical ecosystems sustainably for human well-being, with a particular focus on soil, biodiversity and primary production; to reduce hunger and poverty in the tropics through scientific research leading to new technology and knowledge; and to ensure environmental sustainability through research on the biology and fertility of tropical soils, targeted interventions, building scientific capability and contributions to policy. However, successful resource management and sustainable agricultural productivity need to go still further, into the realms of markets, health and policies. The central hypothesis is that natural resource management (NRM) research will have more leverage if the apparent gaps between investment in the natural resource base and income generation can be bridged. Therefore, TSBF-CIAT's new strategy has been to take ISFM an additional step forward by addressing the full chain of interactions from resources to production systems to markets and polices-the \"Resource to Consumption\" (R-to-C) framework [547]. Under this framework, investment in soil fertility management represents a key entry point to agricultural productivity growth, and a necessary condition for obtaining positive net returns to other types of farm investments.TSBF-CIAT is pursuing the following three objectives under our new strategy:• To improve the livelihoods of people reliant on agriculture by developing profitable, socially-acceptable and resilient agricultural production systems based on ISFM.• To develop sustainable land management (SLM) practices in tropical areas while reversing land degradation.• To build the human and social capital of all TSBF-CIAT stakeholders for research and management on the sustainable use of tropical soils.To achieve these objectives, all of TSBF-CIAT's work can be conceptualized using seven strategic pillars:1. Improving fertilizer efficiency and developing soil and water management practices.2. Improved germplasm as an entry point for managing soil fertility.3. Managing the genetic resources of soil for enhanced productivity and plant health.4. Understanding farm level social dynamics.5. Linking farmers to markets, nutrition and health.6. NRM strategies to move from plot to landscape scales.7. Strengthening scientific and institutional capacity of partners for ISFM.The following sections present the background, achievements, gaps, and potential opportunities and challenges for the research of TSBF-CIAT over the period 2002-2005 and are reviewed with reference to citations of work published (or in progress). With few exceptions, the panels found the quality of the staff and of the research at CIAT to be high. The major substantive recommendations were: to more tightly focus the research program; to attain greater integration of that program; and to improve lines of authority and responsibility. Specific recommendations made by the review team and responses by TSBF-CIAT staff are given in Annex 1 and the TSBF-CIAT staff are listed in Annex 2.1. Improving fertilizer efficiency and developing soil and water management practicesThe technical backbone of ISFM advocates the integration of mineral and organic sources of nutrients, thereby using locally available sources of inputs and maximising their use efficiency. TSBF-CIAT has embraced ISFM research to reverse land degradation and improve the livelihoods of people reliant on agriculture. What is needed is to break the cycle between poverty and land degradation in SSA by employing strategies that empower farmers economically and promoting sustainable agricultural intensification using efficient, effective and affordable plant nutrients.Such affordable management systems should be accessible to the poor, small-scale producers and the approach should be holistic and dynamic in order to foster both technical and institutional change.Nitrogen and phosphorus deficiencies are widespread in all SSA agro-ecosystems, with 80% of the soils deficient in P despite the availability of phosphate rocks in many parts of the continent. The main research highlights on soil characterization in the recent years have been on soil fertility gradients within farms [59,72,74,116,120]. While these studies have shown strong relationships between households' social categories, their production of organic materials, and the intensity with which inputs are applied to \"homefields\" or \"outfields\", variance of soil fertility status within farms is much greater than that observed between farms. For example, in Western Kenya, 58% of the variance in soil organic C was due to variability within farm compared to only 9% for variability between farms [74]. Total N decreased in all sites with distance to the homestead (from 1.30 to 1.06 g/kg), as did Olsen-P (from 10.5 to 2.3 mg/kg). Grain yields in the no-input control plots followed the decrease in soil fertility status with distance to the homestead (from 2.59 to 1.59 t/ha). In the NPK treatments, however, this difference between field types disappeared (from 3.43 to 3.98 t/ha), indicating that N and P are the major limiting nutrients in the target areas [116]. In another study in the drylands of Niger, West Africa, variation of soil C at farm level ranged from 0.1% to 3.2% from the bush fields to the homestead. The fertilizer use efficiency increased with increasing soil C, indicating the need to improve soil with organic amendment in order to increase the fertilizer use efficiency [287].Similar soil constraints (soil acidity, aluminium toxicity, P and N deficiencies) are the major chemical constraints together with soil compaction and erosion as physical constraints for crop-livestock production in tropical savannas of Latin America. In acid savanna soils of Colombia, deep-rooted tropical pastures enhanced soil quality by improving the size and stability of soil aggregates when compared with soils under mono-cropping. Increasing intensity of production systems resulted in improved soil physical conditions but decreased soil organic matter (SOM) and macrofauna populations with the exception of agropastoral systems evaluated where an overall soil improvement was observed [122,220,236].Several studies addressed the dynamics of N, P and C in the soils across the different agro-environments and sustainability indicators were determined from longterm soil fertility management trials [8,220,236]. The rate of decline of soil C has been determined and the importance of the fine fraction in the protection of soil organic carbon assessed. The use of vertical tillage and agropastoral treatments contributed to the build-up of an arable layer in low fertility savanna soils of the Llanos of Colombia as indicated by improved soil physical properties and nutrient availability [55,517,518]. Influence of contrasting agropastoral systems and related P fertilizer inputs on size of P fractions in soil and their isotopic exchangeability were determined in acid savannas of Colombia and the results showed that organic P dynamics are important when soil P reserves are limited [211]. Recent work has shown that additions of charcoal to low fertility, acid Oxisols increases soil pH, cation exchange capacity, BNF and availability of various soil nutrients and result in a net increase in crop and plant yield. Another significant achievement was that the nitrification inhibition activity of accessions of Brachiaria humidicola was similar to the commercial apomictic cultivar indicating the possibility for genetic regulation of this important trait to improve nitrogen use efficiency in crop-livestock systems [318].The quality of organic inputs and their interaction with mineral fertilizers have been the main focus [161,162,175]. A decision tree for selecting organic inputs for nitrogen management have been developed based on their N, lignin and polyphenol contents [51], as has one on manure use in southern Africa [39]. Fertilizer equivalency values of organic materials have been determined and it was found that organic leaves of Tithonia, Senna and Tephrosia had fertilizer equivalencies near 100% [82]. Decision guides have been developed in response to on-farm adaptive research that translate into simple assessments of resource quality to be used by extension agents and farmers, which have been tested with community-based learning activities [112]. Combining organic and mineral inputs has been observed to sometimes result in added benefits in terms of extra crop yield, compared with sole applications of organic and mineral inputs at equivalent rates [78]. In some cases, these benefits were the result of improved soil moisture conditions or reduced wind erosion after application of organic inputs [11,78,80,89]. In other cases, however, mechanisms underlying the creation of positive interactions were not understood.Except for a few phosphate rocks (e.g. Tahoua in Niger, Tilemsi in Mali and Mijingu in Tanzania), most of the phosphate rocks in Africa are low in reactivity and not suitable for direct application. Field work indicated that the P use efficiency from the unreactive rocks can double when phosphate rock was combined with the micro-dose technology.The dry mixture of 25% of P as water soluble P and 75% of P as phosphate rocks gave yields comparable to the use of 100% water soluble P [330].Research on the micro-dose application of fertilizers has focused on evaluating and promoting point or hill application of 4 kg P/ha at planting time of millet and sorghum [233,330]. The combination of strategic hill application of fertilizer with complementary institutional and market linkages, through an inventory credit system (\"Warrantage\") offers a good opportunity to improve crop productivity and farmers' incomes [233].The considerable research invested in water harvesting techniques (e.g. the zaï, stone bunds, contours, tied ridges, etc.) frequently neglects the role of soil nutrients, which in many cases are the most limiting factors. Our research in nutrient and water harvesting in Western, Southern and Eastern Africa has clearly indicated that application of nutrients greatly increased the water use efficiency [100]. In Ethiopia, extremely eroded farm plots were not responding to direct application of organic biomass, however, use of \"zai\" (small ditches to trap water and nutrients) increased yields up to 450% in comparison to the control [120].Given the successes of conservation agriculture in Latin America and elsewhere, AfNet has established network field trials of various conservation agriculture options in 12 sites in East and West Africa. Crop yield was lower with no-till than with tillage practice in continuous cereal, intercropping and rotation systems. There was no difference in maize yield between no-till and tillage practices when crop residue was added in the no-till in Western Kenya. In Burkina Faso, even with crop residue, no-till had lower yields compared to tillage practice and this is attributed to the crusting nature of these soils. Nevertheless, taking advantage of the reduced labour in the no-till, it is likely that the no-till could be more profitable.The concept of \"building up an arable layer\" of improved soil quality addresses the physical and chemical constraints of acid savanna soils, using corrective tillage, amendments, and fertilizers, and deep-rooting plants in rotational systems to recover water and nutrients from the subsoil. Such arable layer technologies lay a foundation for implementing no-tillage systems on infertile tropical soils; research in close collaboration with CORPOICA and other partners in the Llanos of Colombia show the concept is both technically feasible and economically attractive to farmers [5]. Long-term field experiments are testing the effects of grain legumes, green manures, intercrops and leys as possible components that could increase the stability of systems involving annual crops. No-till treatments have consistently provided lower bulk density, higher total porosity, and significantly higher maize yields than the minimum tillage system. Maize yields on native savanna soils were also markedly lower than in the rest of the treatments, indicating the need for improved soil conditions in subsoil layers for root growth of maize [55,94,303,404].• Increase fertilizers' use efficiencies in order to make them more profitable.• Contribute to the development of the local fertilizer sector through feasibility studies (e.g. on the use of the indigenous phosphate rocks).• Investigate and quantify fertilizers' effects on global change, green house gas (GHG) emissions, water quality, deforestation and land degradation, interactions with pest and diseases and carbon sequestration.• Use decision support tools to improve fertilizer use efficiency (e.g. NuMaSS expert system). Field trials conducted in Nicaragua and Honduras have shown that farmers can optimise fertilizer use when they take into account previous crop management, crop and soil characteristics, expected yields and resources available.• For the concept on building an arable layer to be functional, more attention needs to be given to the driving forces behind farmer decision making and the existing policies for intensifying agriculture on infertile savanna lands.The traditional starting point for soil fertility management is developing options that improve nutrient availability (i.e. the supply of nutrients). Whilst the research that TSBF-CIAT has conducted along this logic has added much to our knowledge of these processes, it is increasingly recognised that investments in soil fertility can only realise their potential in the presence of plants that are able to incorporate nutrients in their biomass (i.e. with sufficient demand for those nutrients). For example, given the soil acidity and soil physical constraints in tropical savannas, CIAT researchers realized that selection and development of acid tolerant crop and forage germplasm was the logical way to manage low fertility acid soils and to contribute to food security and poverty alleviation. In close collaboration with rice, beans, forages and other CGIAR commodity programs and regional partners, significant research for development efforts were made to introduce, test and disseminate productive and adapted germplasm. Finally, it should be noted that due to the short-term benefits associated with improved varieties, targeting better soil fertility management in integration with such varieties usually results in immediate interest from farming communities. Consequently, the integration of resilient germplasm is a full component of the ISFM research for development paradigm.These improved crop and forage germplasm options interact with rural livelihoods and soil fertility management in a number of ways:(1) through direct improvement of the natural resource base (soil fertility, soil and water retention), e.g. by integration of legumes in existing cropping systems and dual purpose live barriers, (2) through enabling crop production under conditions where local germplasm produces little yield, e.g. by integration of acid-tolerant varieties on soils with low pH, novel crop rotation system, (3) through generation of cash income that maybe re-invested in soil management, and (4) through provision of nutrient-dense (biofortified) edible components that can substantially enhance the health status of people engaged in agriculture with obvious consequence on the availability of labour.The original mandate of TSBF in Africa before joining CIAT focussed on the management of organic inputs, rather than their production per se, the latter being the mandate of the institutes that are engaged in breeding activities. These activities culminated in the development of the Organic Resource Database, the Decision Support System for Organic N Management, and initiatives aimed at validating these concepts [39,51,81,82,120]. While validating the above concepts with farmers, it became apparent that most organic inputs available at the farm level are of medium or low quality and that the total amount of organic resources available was insufficient to sustain or increase production. The mandate of TSBF-CIAT therefore broadened to include activities aimed at producing organic resources, such as the integration of N-fixing legumes, among them, Mucuna and other cover crops [28,29,43,155], cereal-legume rotations, (e.g. cowpea-sorghum in West Africa [97,123], maize and soybean in southern Africa [156]).Through these activities, it also became apparent that not all legumes grow equally well across all plots within a farm and that farmer interest in certain legumes was driven by issues far beyond soil fertility improvement in itself. Niches can be identified at the farm and landscape scale where specific production options can be optimized, applied and evaluated [1,13,43,112,142,143,150,151,154,155,156,183]. In Latin America, fertilizer availability is greater and emphasis on biomass production is lower, except when used to improve soil fertility in planted fallow systems. Short-term planted fallows on volcanic ash soils in the Andean hillsides restored soil fertility by enhancing nutrient recycling through the provision of SOM. Field and greenhouse studies indicated that a significant diversity exists in decomposition and nutrient release patterns of several organic materials and highlighted the value of screening new farming system components to achieve efficient nutrient cycling [19,20]. In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility (IVDMD) was identified as a quality parameter of plant materials that significantly correlated to nutrient release rates [19,76,77] and can be easily and cheaply used to assess forage quality in animal nutrition studies to predict decomposition and N release. Studies on the impact of improved fallows on soil fertility also indicated that Tithonia diversifolia slash/mulch system has the greatest potential to improve SOM, nutrient availability, and P cycling because of its ability to accumulate high amounts of biomass and nutrients [6] possibly due to strong symbiotic association with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi [8,56,68,220]. The Calliandra calothyrsus slash/mulch fallow system proved to be the most resilient as it produced similar amounts of biomass independent of initial level of soil fertility and was thus a candidate for wider testing as a potential source of nutrient additions to the soil and to generate fuelwood for resource-poor rural communities.Specific constraints to crop production can halt the utilisation of other nutrients that are not in short supply. Germplasm that is adapted to adverse biotic and abiotic stresses have been evaluated in various regions-e.g. new Lablab accessions [43], aluminium-resistant beans and Brachiaria grasses [40,60,117,209,220,316], drought tolerant crop and forage options [2,3,229,447,448], herbicide-resistant maize for striga control, dual purpose soybean varieties [64,125], tissue culture bananas inoculated with specific arbuscal-mycorrhizal fungi [104], and acid soil adapted crop and forage options to the tropical savannas of Latin America [168,317]. New drought tolerant beans, upland rice for hillsides and early maturing soybeans are currently under testing in novel rotational systems hillsides of Nicaragua [122]. Genetic variability was found among accessions of Brachiaria humidicola regarding the nitrification inhibition activity of root exudates [149].Situating improved germplasm within a full context of economic, socio-cultural, and policy conditions has developed within TSBF-CIAT to the point that research on how to link improved germplasm is now a full-fledged strategic pillar of its own (cf.2005-2010 Strategic Document and the discussion of \"Linking farmers to markets, nutrition, and health\" below). Whilst this is a new area, initial research has shown that linking germplasm demand to markets can greatly facilitate and guide research on technology choices and soil fertility constraints. Examples include the marketoriented evaluation, adaptation, integration of dual-purpose soybean in cropping systems in Kenya and Uganda [125,126], and the evaluation of cowpea, sugar bean and soybean varieties linked to market types and market demand in Zimbabwe [137,154]. Other activities have successfully developed and linked improved NRM with export markets though smallholder farmers producing for certified organic markets in Europe [286]. In Latin American hillsides, the approach has been to combine improved soil fertility management (high fertility trenches) with market oriented high value crops. Net income increased by several fold in prototypes developed in San Dionisio, Nicaragua [122].This theme is also a new research priority, but initial progress has focussed on understanding the implications of changing production priorities at the farm level on household food (energy and protein) security and their implication on nutrient balances and household income [4,154].Developing more profitable and resilient production systems in the coming years will require the application of the knowledge and understanding of nutrient management processes in the following areas:• Managing biomass:(i) Quantification of the multiple benefits of organic inputs for specific environments;(ii) Quantification of the long term impact of organic resource quality on the quantity and quality of the SOM pool; (iii) Use of drought tolerant germplasm for increasing dry season feed supply and coping with climate change; (iv) Further evaluation of organic resource production options with farming communities in relation to their current and future priorities and constraints.• Germplasm that is adapted to low fertility conditions:(i) Quantification of the overall contribution of improved germplasm to the sustainability and profitability of the systems and to rural livelihoods as a whole using simulation modelling tools and trade-off analysis (e.g. DSSAT, NUANCES, IMPACT, APSIM); (ii) Drought tolerance will be an increasingly important trait in new germplasm together with resistance to major biotic constraints.• Linking improved germplasm to markets:Evaluating and quantifying the soil-based implications of the market-led hypothesis (e.g. does inclusion of improved germplasm result in better soil management practices or does it merely enhance nutrient mining? Does the increased income from market sales lead to increased investment in agriculture and NRM? Is it feasible to produce high value crops without investing in IPM+INM?)• Linking improved germplasm to nutrition:(i) Evaluating relationships between soil fertility status, soil management practices, and the post-harvest and nutritional quality of the produce (especially for the much advocated bio-fortified germplasm (e.g. Zn and Fe-dense beans) promoted by the HarvestPlus challenge program);(ii) Investigating the linkages between improving access to high-quality (i.e. nutrient dense) diets and improved health status and labour availability at the household level.Soil microbiology is facing a number of challenges in the new century. There are societal demands for more information on sustainable resource management in forestry, rangelands, and intensive agriculture, and on maintaining biological diversity in those ecosystems. Below-ground biodiversity (BGBD) is dramatically reduced when forests are converted to agricultural land, and when agricultural land use is intensified. Reduced BGBD may decrease agricultural productivity and reduce the \"resilience\" of agricultural systems, which then become more vulnerable to adverse climatic events, erosion, pests, diseases, and other threats. Sustainable management of BGBD will enhance the resilience and sustainability of agroecosystems and, at the same time, help conserve soil genetic resources for bioprospecting. The recognition of global climate change as a research priority raises many questions about the role of SOM and macro and micro-organisms in C cycling and the production and consumption of radiative gases. While there has been great progress in molecular biology and in the procedural aspects of genetic engineering, the problem is much more one of \"what to do\" rather than \"how to do it\".The urgency to slow down BGBD losses and better assess the potential uses of soil biodiversity in ecosystem management and bio-prospecting underpin the \"Conservation and Sustainable Management of Below-Ground Biodiversity\" (CSM-BGBD) Project. During the first phase, an inventory of soil organisms (from micro-organisms through macro-fauna, including bacteria, fungi, protozoa, insects, worms, and other invertebrates), has been carried out in the seven participating countries (Brazil, Côte d'Ivoire, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Mexico, Uganda) [164]. This inventory has identified and described many new species-e.g. 11 belowground biota groups were recorded in Lampung, Indonesia: 53 ant genera, 59 beetle families/subfamilies, 37 termite species, 10 earthworm species, 44 collembolla species, 113 nematodes genera, 26 arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi/ AMF morphospecies, 9 plant pathogenic fungi genera, 4 lignin degrading fungi genera, 7 cellulose degrading fungi genera and 228 legume nodulating bacteria isolates. In some cases, these organisms may ultimately be useful to society (e.g. as inoculums for improving yields). For example, the inoculation of soil with earthworms for improving the formation of soil aggregates has been tested with promising results [200].According to the importance of the soybean activities within TSBF-CIAT and the presence of a new staff soil microbiologist in TSBF-CIAT, some new activities have started on the utilization of rhizobial inoculums for improving plant growth. A soil Microbiology Laboratory has been set up in TSBF-CIAT (Kenya) where it is possible to isolate and cultivate rhizobial strains in both solid and liquid culture. Ongoing projects on both grain and tree legumes require the capacity to characterize the indigenous rhizobia present in the nodules harvested in the field. In the absence of indigenous strains capable of nodulating the host plant, we need to inoculate with selected rhizobia. Interesting results were obtained in the field with tree legumes [24,36,66]. With banana production, initial work has shown that it is possible to significantly increase the growth of banana plants produced in vitro (tissue culture) by inoculation with well-identified arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) isolates.The combination of soil fertility and pest and disease management approaches provides a unique opportunity to exploit synergies allowing better control of these limitations to crop productivity [376].Organic matter management can benefit soil biota (e.g. through erosion protection, nutrient cycling, control of pathogens) but can have complex impacts on the balance between the populations of harmful and beneficial organisms. Work studying pathogens, microregulators and microsymbionts during cultivation of common bean in soils infested with pathogenic fungi has shown that despite the relatively limited time of green manure treatments, application of 6 t/ha of Calliandra houstoniana biomass to root-rot infested soil significantly reduced incidence (about 15%) and simultaneously increased yield (about 10%) in rootrot susceptible bean variety (A70) compared to control plots [519].However, while application of Tithonia diversifolia reduced the root-rot incidence by close to 30%, it also reduced yield significantly.Further studies are in progress to understand the interactions among soil fertility, soil biota (pathogenic and beneficial), and crop yield.Soil structure influences multiple dimensions of soil fertility such as erosion, infiltration, drainage, water holding capacity and aeration, as well as nutrient and carbon cycling and biological activity. Earthworms, ants and termites constitute the soil macrofauna with greatest effects on soil structure while AMF, soil bacteria and plant roots have received increased attention in recent years as key determinants in soil aggregate formation and stabilization in the 'aggregate dynamic model'. This model directly links aggregate formation and breakdown in soils to the turnover of particulate organic matter (POM) as mediated by microbial and macrofauna activity proposes that in tropical soils several biological processes lead to the formation of \"biological macroaggregates\" through the activity of fungi and bacteria, plant roots and macrofauna (e.g. earthworms). Earthworms have pronounced effects on soil structure as a consequence of their burrowing activities as well as their ingestion of soil and production of biogenic structures or casts. Several studies have shown a strong relationship between AMF hyphal length and water stable aggregation in different soil types. Our studies in Colombia [144] have developed a bioassay in which we confirmed this relationship in volcanic-ash soils for a mixed inoculum.On going studies have focused on the functional diversity of three AMF genera (Entrophospora, Gigaspora, Glomus) in the production of external hyphae and soil aggregation [392].A key question when trying to link soil organisms with their soil structure modification function is the need to define the origin of different types of aggregates found in soils and their temporal and spatial dynamics. Recent studies have developed a visual method to separate soil aggregates that is sensitive to land use change [152]. Additionally, the use of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) on visually separated soil aggregates in this study has also shown the capacity to link such biogenic structures to the organisms that produced them. This is a major step forward that will allow exploring the relative importance of soil organisms in soil structure modification as well as the study of their temporal and spatial dynamics as affected by land use change along intensification gradients.The \"Quesungual\" slash and mulch agroforestry system of southern Honduras presents an opportunity for studying the effects of trees on soil macrofauna dynamics in time and space [436]. While at a broad scale soil macrofauna communities are highly variable, preliminary results found positive associations between tree distribution (and tree management, such as pruning), the distribution of leaf litter, and the distribution of ant and earthworm activity. This has important implications for farm management, as it shows that farmers do not have to increase the density of large trees (which compete with crops for sunlight, water and nutrients) in order to increase litter cover and soil fauna activity.In the seven CSM-BGBD project countries, the response of BGBD to different land use intensities varied from forest land to agricultural land. For example, the richness and abundance of ants, beetles and termites decreased with increasing land use intensification in Indonesia. Meanwhile, the abundance and biomass of earthworms were not affected by land use change, although intensification tended to reduce the individual earthworm size. \"Exotic\" earthworm species thrived in agricultural land, whereas \"native\" species were encountered only in forest. The ecological importance of exotic vs. native earthworms was unclear and will be studied in the second phase of the BGBD project. Nematode abundance was not affected by land use change although its richness decreased. Intensification reduced the AMF spore numbers but did not affect the richness of other fungi [164].Building the capacity of partners in soil microbiology, linking soil biology and broader ISFM research (including integration with social science research), and improving communication and collaboration between partners in multi-site research.• Linking the management of SOM and soil functions (ecosystem services) to either direct or indirect manipulation or control of soil organisms (e.g. CSM-BGBD, WOTRO, and MICROBES projects).• Investigating the effects of climate change on land use and the soil's genetic resources (e.g. the effect of extreme oscillations in rainfall and temperature on nutrient cycling and biologically moderated carbon sequestration).• Initiating new research on the biology of dryland soils, including microsymbionts in dryland agroforestry systems (Gum Arabic) and the effects of climate change on dryland production systems.• Improve understanding and opportunities for biological farming within the framework of ISFM.From its beginnings, TSBF-CIAT has been known for leading edge biophysical research in soil fertility management. Its contributions to understanding the sociocultural and gender dynamics of soil fertility have been more modest, but TSBF has been committed from its inception to including social sciences in its research agenda [446]. Pioneering work where social scientists took the lead in research addressed the dynamics of agrarian and land-use change [21], the gendered nature of ISFM decision-making [176], the role of social institutions mediating farmers' access to resources [520,521,523] and the interaction of local and scientific knowledge on soil fertility management [227,228].The growth of TSBF-CIAT and its expanding research agenda confronts the broader problem of a lack of social science research capacity (in our partner NARES as well as within CIAT) able to contend with NRM issues. Efforts to build rigorous social research capacity within AfNet, MIS, and within the partnerships of research projects are on-going but require sufficient resources and the support of multidisciplinary \"champions\" from outside the social sciences.Work addressing the existing knowledge base of local communities has been led by both social and biophysical scientists, in Latin America and Africa [7,43,93,112,153,159]. These activities have served both to investigate and value local knowledge and to provide forums for studying the dynamics of the interaction between scientists and farmers. For example, understanding local soil management units has provided a logic for developing land-use plans [46] and for sampling soil biota [148,436,528]. On studying the dynamics of the interaction between local knowledge(s) and that of outsiders, the Strengthening \"Folk Ecology\" project in Western Kenya has tested and studied a community-based methodology with local partners and community groups [112]. Particular attention has been paid to how knowledge is generated, shared, and withheld within social networks [216]. This approach uses on-going dialogue between scientists and farmers to build a \"dynamic expertise\" on soil fertility management that shares the strengths of disparate knowledge bases. Key outputs include: documenting ecological knowledge (including local indicators of soil quality and of ecosystem change); and empowering communities to continue conducting and evaluating ISFM experiments without the presence of a project.This body of research was started by Simon Carter and Eve Crowley, through their work on land use change and the role of off-farm income and social institutions in farming livelihoods and the sustainability of the soils in Western Kenya. The research explored the dynamics of special micro-niches on the farm high in soil fertility. The gender dynamics of land and livelihoods were researched further, with focus on the changing nature of the gender division of labour, land tenure and social relations [176]. This work further nuanced understandings of labour availability, the increasing demands to generate cash incomes and farmers' priorities and constraints. It also demonstrated how land tenure played a key role in determining how resources (especially soil fertility inputs) are invested in the special micro-niches high in soil fertility.Another area of innovation has been in the area of methodologies. This has been carried out through the use of ethnographic work, the collection of personal narratives, participatory photography, on-farm experimentation, household typologies, social-network and diffusion mapping [28,72,133,406,424]. Many of the experiences of the Strengthening \"Folk Ecology\" project have been compiled as a Manual of Interactive Techniques [529], intended to serve not as a template for others to follow but to provide situated examples of how certain efforts at engaging researchers or farmers in experimentation succeeded or failed. Most recently, social scientific programming is including a special fund (the \"Sikana fund\", in memory of the late Patrick Sikana who first proposed the idea), equal to 5%-10% of total project funds that will give farmers the opportunity to decide for themselves how to invest the funds. How farmers choose to apply the funds will itself be part of the research process, and shed further light on their constraints and priorities, as well as the social dynamics (including the negotiated and contested nature of decision making).Interdisciplinary collaboration ensures that social scientific research priorities and hypotheses inform and influence the broader bodies of biophysical research (and vice versa). Such co-learning can be immensely rewarding when it succeeds but must such efforts should not \"drown out\" social scientific research in it own right, which be carried out in conjunction and at the same time as this service provision role [214]. Examples of the positive influence of social scientific ideas within interdisciplinary projects include: (i) the analysis of the role of both social differentiation and local knowledge bases in the generation and maintenance of soil fertility gradients [72,74,133]; (ii) social scientific research in aspects of BGBD in all seven countries; (iii) plot to landscape level research (different scales, farm characterization and household characterization to target technologies) in Ethiopian highlands focusing on strengthening bylaws and collective action schemes for soil and water management [159]; (iv) research on the formation, restructuring, and scaling up processes of farmer field schools in Uganda and Kenya [43,196].• Social science in the lead role:(i) Gender and land tenure (expanding on past research, as well as contributing to work spear-headed by IDRC);(ii) Rural-urban linkages, resource flows and dynamics of vulnerability; (iii) Special micro-niches (soil fertility gradients);(iv) Relationship between indigenous and scientific knowledge; (iii) Approaches and knowledge required for scaling out of technologies (e.g. how up-scalable are ISFM technologies and the farmer-scientist interactions).• Documenting and show-casing the institutional memory of the Institute in terms of social science (a \"social sciences symposium\", interactions with the Anthro-No-Apology network-e.g. edited volume \"Beyond the Biophysical\" [166]).• Developing other partnerships (e.g. with ERI, Latin America, AHI, AfNet) through NGOs, extensions, farmers groups, local-level partnerships.In the past, increasing agricultural production occupied the central position in all agricultural development efforts. This emphasis held land as the most important factor of production and explains why agricultural productivity (yield) was commonly expressed in terms of output per unit area. Little attention was given to the productivity of the other traditional factors of production such as labour and capital.In the last few years this focus has changed in TSBF-CIAT, as the research for development paradigm has evolved and as it has been increasingly recognized that increased production alone cannot solve the multiple problems of smallholderfarmers. There is now strong research focus on improving their general livelihood dimensions (income, improved well-being, reduced vulnerability, improved food security, more sustainable use of natural resources, more access to external inputs, etc.). Linking farmers to markets, nutrition and health is an important entry point for improving livelihoods and address the fact that intensification of agricultural production cannot be sustained without linking farmers to input and output markets. Production has also been constrained through (i) unorganized marketing structures, whose conduct and performance has badly affected farmers' access to farm inputs and profitable agricultural production (ii) low value-addition (processing, grading, bulking, inspection, certification, standardization, branding, etc.) along the market chain has also reduced the profit potentials of farmers' agricultural production. Poor nutrition and health have also been linked with both inadequate farm labour availability and low factor (including labour) productivity, especially with the advent of HIV/AIDS pandemic. All these explain the need to link farmers to input and output markets, nutrition and health. Improvements in technology, with no change in the product that is to be consumed locally or traded, will not be sufficient to radically alter this situation. High value crops offer a solution to this problem.Whilst the majority of TSBF-CIAT's research outcomes have concentrated on production constraints, this strategic pillar of our research focus has only gained momentum in the last 2 years. Previous work in this area has been through support to broader CIAT-Africa research activities through their ERI program under the Rural Innovation Institute and has focused on the market-led hypothesis that tests whether increased incomes leads to increased investments in NRM [64,283,285].Soybean: Results (unpublished) of the inventory data aimed at understanding why many past efforts to promote soybean (a well-known versatile crop) in the farming systems of Kenya led to limited success and impact on soybean development implicated: (i) low productivity, (ii) lack of know-how on soybean processing and utilization, and (iii) lack of markets. Following this understanding, we have developed an action plan and strategy to address problems of low productivity through farmer-led screening and participatory evaluation of improved promiscuous dual-purpose varieties obtained from the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) in Nigeria. Farmer evaluation of eight dual-purpose soybean varieties tested in five locations in western Kenya identified varieties best suited to each environment and community. Only one variety (SB19) was ranked amongst the top four selected in each of the five locations. Some of the remaining varieties were only selected in specific locations.With respect to lack of knowhow on soybean processing and utilization and lack of market for soybean, we developed a \"three-tier approach\", for comprehensive soybean processing and market development in Kenya. The first tier is on household-level soybean market development centred on training on various processing methods for household food consumption. The second tier is a community-level soybean market development centred on soymilk production. A two-price scenario (pessimistic and optimistic price scenarios) analysis of soymilk production shows that this value addition leads to 4 to 14 times (US$1946-7069) more net returns than if the soybean is sold as grains without any further processing. The third tier improves on earlier work [433] on value addition, emphasizing the training of stakeholders on processing soybean into products with good market potential.Although gum Arabic has a strong market potential, there are significant differences in the level of organization of its market (cf. Fagg and Allison, 2004). The contribution of TSBF-CIAT is the link to the effect of some microbiological interventions such as rhizobia inoculation and mycorrhiza symbioses on the survival and yield of the acacia trees producing gum Arabic.Results from 2-year on-farm trials in Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger showed that average grain yields of millet and sorghum were greater by 44%-120%, while farmers' incomes increased 52%-134% when using hill application of fertilizer than with the earlier recommended fertilizer broadcasting methods and farmers' practice. Farmers using the \"Warrantage\" inventory credit system realized substantial net profits: revenue obtained from the micro-dose treatment was greater than that from the recommended practice (3x greater for millet, 2.5x greater for sorghum) [233].The strategy in Latin America has been to work closely with other CIAT projects such as the Agro-enterprise project to identify most suitable crop-oriented options Selected crops (tomato and green pepper) were planted in Yorito, Honduras, and San Dionisio, Nicaragua, in high fertility trenches with combined organic and inorganic inputs [122]. Recent results showed a significant increase in gross income compared to traditional maize-bean rotations.An area of increasing interest for market linkages is through organic and Fair-Trade certification of production to take advantage of premium prices paid by exporters. Whilst it is recognized that this is a niche market that can not be entered into by all farmers, its potential as a growth market is huge and in turn this will impact on many more farmers: in Uganda expansion is around 20% a year, with 46,000 farmers currently certified. Examples from pilot sites in Uganda and Mozambique have shown how this approach has enabled farmers to access new market information (e.g. prices, quantities, quality) and new research products (e.g. disease resistant germplasm, variety evaluation for export, investing in natural resources and soil fertility) on critical aspects of production and how they have used this new information to develop competitive and profitable export organic agroenterprises. Building farmers' capacities to learn about biological and ecological complexity using participatory approaches and involving farmers in experimentation is a critical success strategy for empowering farmers to be able to learn and to innovate [286,291].• Understanding and scaling up knowledge and methods to other crops and systems (e.g. the \"three-tier\" approach with soybean, the micro-dosing and \"warrantage\" revolving credit system).• Quantifying the following relationships:(i) between good market access and soil fertility improvement;(ii) between HIV/AIDS and nutrition and HIV/AIDS and the consumption of soybean products;(iii) between soil fertility status and nutrition and between soil fertility status and postharvest quality of produce;(iv) between fertilizer use/soil fertility and food quality; (v) between bio-fortification and food quality.• Ensuring the sustainability of the institutional linkages for promoting crops.• Linking TSBF-CIAT activities with other regional and global initiatives.• Linking productivity resulting from the manipulation of the biodiversity under the BGBD and Microbes projects with markets.• Develop strategic alliances with the private sector to warrant economically beneficial prices and provide inputs for small farmers.• Address trade agreements (CAFTA for Central America and TLC for Colombia) and diversification of current cropping systems with the introduction of high value crops under user friendly IPM and ISFM strategies.5. Linking farmers to markets, nutrition and healthLand and resource degradation encompasses a complex of soil and water loss, nutrient depletion, depleted forest resources, scarce and inefficient water use, declining livestock contributions to the systems and infrastructure limiting access to markets. Up to very recently R4D actors did not also realize the need for developing various technological options for various landscape scenarios and the non-linear scaling relationships of different processes from plot to watersheds and from farmer to communities and vice versa. Plot and farm level interventions are typically less influenced by externalities (e.g. the need for collective decision and management of resources) than cross-boundary issues. Furthermore, the economic conditions and policy environment have not provided the necessary incentives for communities to make long term investments in better management of their resources to arrest this degradation scenario at plot, farm and landscape scales.Farm and landscape characterization tools and models for targeting technologies in various farm niches have been tested and validated in both Africa and Latin America. Work with farmer research committees (FRC) in the highlands of East Africa (Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda) has used scenario analyses to identify and characterize NRM constraints, landscape positions and production options, which can then be used to target suitable technologies and solutions [4,28,29,118,120]. Such interventions began rather conservatively with a focus on crop varieties but with ongoing support from modelling and scenario analysis FRCs have broadened to more complex issues, such as soil and water conservation with elephant grass contour strips, and farmer experiments with herbaceous and agroforestry legumes for fodder in improved dairy production, soil fertility and mixing early-and latematuring maize varieties opened a niche for a legume relay [118]. Modelling in Ethiopia has also shown how the current risk of food insecurity and erosion could be reversed (while still satisfying household food and cash requirements) by reallocating land from low biomass producing cereal-dominated cropping to high biomass producing perennial food and cash crops [4,119]. A decision guide which combined biophysical and socio-economic determinants was developed and validated to facilitate the identification of social and biophysical niches for the integration and landscape level adoption of legumes [182].In the Colombian Andes, farm and landscape characterization was involved in the identification and classification of local knowledge about soils and their management [46]. The characterization of land-use distribution facilitated uncertainty analysis and risk management by local farmers (e.g. Potrerillo microwatershed of Cauca) [411,477]). In the Amazon region, characterization and modelling tools have quantified the impacts of land-use change on soil C to enhance plant productivity and C sequestration in soils in areas where slash and burn is still 6. NRM strategies to move from plot to landscape scales a common management practice [30]. Preliminary results from the Quesungual Slash and Mulch Agroforestry System (QSMAS) in Honduras indicated that soil losses under QSMAS of different ages (2, 5 and >10 years) were less than 2 Mg/ha in 14 weeks in comparison to the 30 Mg/ha soil losses observed in the traditional slash and burn control treatments [264]. Finally, application of these tools to the Llanos of Colombia and Venezuela has shown that intensification of agriculture, livestock and forestry in the region in the next 2 decades could result in a net increase of 160 Tg of C in the soil stocks, demonstrating the high potential of the region for providing environmental services [221].In hilly landscapes soils and nutrients are washed away by run-off following heavy rains, particularly before crop establishment, and a strategy was tested to trap nutrients that could be otherwise lost. In farms where there is a tree cover and/or where the homestead is surrounded by perennial food and fiber crops at the head of the slope, nutrient loss in the outfields was successfully reduced by fast growing fallow crops (e.g. Vetch) while in farms where there was no vegetation at the head of the slope, nutrient could be trapped by fast growing multipurpose legumes and other herbaceous shrubs planted as a hedge at the lowest end and the middle of the slope following conservation ditches. Cut-and-carrying of this biomass can then effectively recycle nutrients to the original plots [8,19,181].Work with partners and community-based organizations has highlighted the complexity of ways in which local and external factors can facilitate or impede collective action for ISFM [170,213,214,323]. There are no general principles that obtain everywhere under all conditions, but generally working with existing institutions and networks is preferable to creating new structures. ISFM knowledge in many communities is treated as a privileged resource not to be shared indiscriminately, which means that scientists seeking to promote new technologies need to provide settings that validate both the new knowledge itself and existing knowledge [7], as well reinforcing the positive value of knowledge dissemination within multiple social networks [424]. Some farm-level activities provoked interfarmer boundary conflicts (e.g. construction of soil bunds), which demand a process of collective management and negotiation to build the confidence needed to address higher-scale community issues. In Ethiopia, this scheme was used not only to organize labour and encourage the communities to put bunds, trees, waterways, etc. across the landscape, but also to develop and strengthen bylaws to help manage collective benefits [159].Work in the seven countries of the CSM-BGBD project (Brazil, Côte d'Ivoire, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Mexico, Uganda) has used comparative sampling with landscape level systematic grids to begin establishing and testing the relationships between land management intensity and BGBD [164]. The rich database (biophysical, biological and socio-economic) has data collected that transcends scales and can be ordered according to plot and landscape attributes that target differentiated beneficiaries some at plot level and others at landscape level. These experiences show the dependence of farmers on common land (e.g. BGBD project experience in India and Mexico where portions of community of land is set aside for shared interests such as for water catchments and other ecological and social needs). From this experience, lessons will be learnt on how to address land-uses that require communal participation and conservation at the landscape level.The project \"Payment for Ecosystem Services\" (financed by the Water and Food Challenge Program-WFCP) is applying a methodology for integrated watershed analysis in pilot watersheds of Colombia and Peru [113]. Scenario analyses of economic payments for ecosystem services determined the cost of each ton of reduced sediment. In the Miskiyacu micro-watershed, for example, it was calculated that only 2 months of payments were required to cover the cost of promoting coffee under shade in the prioritized area [443]. A multi-criteria optimization model permits ex ante analysis of multiple land-use options, calculating the socioeconomic and environmental costs of changes in land use and technology under different spatial and temporal scenarios. This approach is being applied with stakeholders in analysing the five pilot Andean watersheds (Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia), to support the identification of land use alternatives and management practices that internalize externalities [173].One of the key elements in devising payments or compensation schemes for environmental services is through knowledge about the environmental service itself and the changes or modifications this is facing [443]. This is the case for the water quality of Fuquene Lake in Cundinamarca, Colombia, which is eutrophying with nutrients from urban and agricultural activities. Research with multiple partners is clarifying the origin and quantities of pollutants, using standard monitoring and modelling techniques as well as the use of stable isotopes [113,173,440,442,443].To accelerate interpretation of soil quality, NIRS analysis methods have been validated for different agro-ecosystems in both Colombia and Kenya [69,72,83,152]. The calibration of different NIRS signatures with soil chemical and biological properties show the high potential of NIRS for evaluating soil quality in large areas, rapidly, reliably and economically, thereby facilitating decision-making with respect to soil management and conservation.• Addressing soil fertility and carbon-sequestration and GHG emissions at higher scales (e.g. new project to rehabilitate degraded lands through silvopastoral systems and reforestation with native timber species in the Caribbean savannas of Colombia under the Biocarbon Fund).• Erosion and water management at higher level (addressing conflicts because of erosion and deposition, Upstream down stream conflicts).• Under what conditions will the landscape level interventions work and under which conditions will it not work (e.g. fragmented land ownership across watersheds makes it difficult to consolidate landscape level activities and interventions).• Convincing farmers to invest in collective action at landscape level using crossboundary technologies and interventions.• Building the case for farmers and communities to participate in BGBD conservation at landscape, regional and global levels (based on BGBD processes and expected benefits).• Trade-offs between economic considerations and environmental concerns (i.e. degradation/regeneration) for selected interventions (e.g. growing Eucalyptus spp.) on the landscape vs. the economic benefits presented by presence of the trees.Most African countries allocate less than 2% of GDP for agricultural research and the annual growth in agricultural research spending since 1990 has continued to decline.This situation is similar in Latin America, except in Brazil. Most NARES in both SSA and Latin America have therefore suffered a dramatic reduction in human and financial resources. Tertiary education has also not been spared the erosion caused by decades of underinvestment, loss of staff incentives and failure to recruit replacements for an ageing cadre of professors. Education programmes in agriculture, forestry and environment delivered to most scientists use dated, narrowly defined, and specialized perspectives that do not produce scientists with the scope and analytical skills and techniques needed to solve real development issues.TSBF-CIAT established its AfNet in 1988 to exploit the advantages of networking as a means of building the capacity of African institutions to conduct interdisciplinary ISFM research at regional and international levels. The Consortium for the Integrated Management of Fragile Soils (MIS) in Central America was likewise formed in 1998 with the participation of 19 institutions that embraces the full spectrum of research, education and development. These two networks are adopting participatory and gender perspectives in research, technology testing and adaptation in addition to conducting process research. Partnerships, collaboration and multidisciplinary approaches are enabling a holistic and comprehensive problem and opportunity analysis, taking into account different stakeholder perspectives and socio-economic limitations to solutions. Both networks are increasingly adopting a market-oriented approach in order to diversify production systems and support ISFM through increased farmer income.A range of network trials are being implemented in over 100 sites across SSA. Implementation of the trials is undertaken by scientists and partners from NARES. Such network trials cover all aspects of the ISFM research agenda and contribute significantly to the strategic understanding of how specific management options perform, as influenced by agro-ecological conditions. Research activities include management of mineral and organic inputs, the integration of legumes in cropping systems, biological nitrogen fixation, BGBD, conservation agriculture and soil and water conservation. The research highlights from these trials have been presented in previous sections of this report.In the case of MIS, partners developed a common logical framework that put emphasis on three aspects: (1) collection and synthesis and of available information • In Africa a total of 101 MSc and PhD students have been trained during the period.• In Latin America, a total of 64 BSc, MSc and PhD students have been trained.• An innovative initiative between AfNet and the International Foundation for Science (IFS) has helped young MSc and PhD graduates throughout SSA to develop project proposals for IFS funding on TSBF-CIAT's major research and development themes. At present about 20 researchers have received the grants and this effort will be further strengthened. The Below-Ground Biodiversity Program (BGBD) has also organized a range of international training workshops on: \"Ecology and taxonomy of termites and ants\", \"Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) and Ectomycorrhiza (ecology, taxonomy and methods of inventory)\", \"Ecology and taxonomy of earthworms\", \"Nematodes\", and a training course on \"Molecular techniques for BGBD\".Training courses organized by MIS include: soil quality indicators, water quality, SWAT modelling, nutrient management (NuMaSS), desertification processes, and field monitoring systems on land degradation. Eight soil-plant-water laboratories from Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua made initial steps to develop a sub-network to foster quality control and information comparison/exchange on analytical procedures for nutrient management recommendations. Twelve field days were organized in Cauca and three training courses were organized in the Colombian Llanos.Numerous projects have addressed the challenges of building farmers' capacity for improved soil fertility management. For example, the exchange of ISFM knowledge within farmer field school and farmer research groups in East Africa has been facilitated and studied in diverse settings, including with farmers' own 7. Strengthening scientific and institutional capacity of partners... evaluation of the learning process [29,43,112,119,406]. The \"Payment for Environmental Services\" project of the WFCP has used training courses held in the conservation agriculture pilot site in Fuquene and subsequent courses at the extrapolation sites to build skills and capacity in farmer groups and partner organizations (development agencies, NGOs). Finally, in developing the guide for integrating local and technical indicators of soil quality, Latin American and East African universities, NGOs, and local communities participated in the process, exchanging information and updating the knowledge base [93].• Restructuring AfNet under the umbrella of the Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA), managed by TSBF-CIAT, to accommodate the growing membership. Multidisciplinary, regional research teams will coordinate and facilitate research in three regions (East Africa, West and Central Africa and Southern Africa). Interdisciplinary country-level proposals will be developed to further strengthen the country and regional teams.• MIS is concentrating on developing proposals where the role of the Consortium as the key component for capacity building could be sold (e.g. Quesungual Agroforestry System and NuMaSS projects). Partners are now leading the consortium (e.g. the Executive committee is now driven by experienced researchers from Honduras and Nicaragua).• Institutionalizing capacity in universities and other training institutions. AfNet members in selected universities will develop and implement curricula on soil biology and fertility.• Implementing the \"T-shaped skills\" approach to capacity building (specialization within a context of broad multidisciplinary ability), using multi-disciplinary and participatory research approaches, increased integration of training with field experiments/practice (\"Learning by doing\"), with follow-up activities after training to assess impact.• The networks will play a major role in the advocacy of the problem of soil fertility depletion and the role policy makers need to play to redress the situation. 2. Further strengthen research in TSBF on practical strategies and decision support tools for integrated water and nutrient management, including organic and mineral nutrient sources. Add such components to the existing organic resources DSS/database and include social science aspects in the decision-making process and tools to better understand actionable management strategies, their knowledge requirements, and economics.Agreed. At the moment, TSBF is undertaking research to address the water and nutrient issues within the newly funded project from SDC-Switzerland under the Water and Food Challenge Program (WFCP). Efforts for the next 3 years will be intensified to build the capacity of TSBF and its partners in the application of decision support tools. Linkages with the BP2 Decision Support Project of CIAT could be an important resource. Efforts are being made to build the capacity of TSBF-CIAT and its collaborators in the application of decision support tools including the role of water in the interaction between the organic and inorganic inputs on crop productivity especially in semi-arid areas in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).3. Improve linkages with the private sector to improve access to fertilizer and develop recommendations for its use that are of mutual benefit to all stakeholders involved. TSBF should become the lead institution for providing scientific information to the industry on realistic markets. These will incorporate: data on soils and cropping systems, optimal fertilizer formulations for balanced crop nutrition, fertilizer packaging and information content provided to farmers, practical ISFM concepts, the decision support tools needed for their implementation, and socio-economic research on needs for fertilizer marketing infrastructure, integration with local knowledge to enhance adoption, economic benefits for farmers, and societal costs as a whole. Seek collaboration with BP-2 on developing a joint digital soil mapping project for the SSA region, which could include non-destructive soil measurement methods such as VNIR-DRS.Agreed. TSBF-CIAT soil research is based on the ISFM model and the in-built concepts and integrates local communities and their 'real worlds'. In this regard, TSBF will continue to simplify soil classification in terminologies and farming aspects that farmers easily identify with. TSBF-CIAT is already assembling soil characteristics spatial datasets, spatial climatic datasets, spatial altitude datasets in East Africa with emphasis to Kenya with a view to combining the datasets to aid in decision support for areas most suitable for soybean cultivation in Kenya. These datasets are available and will be shared with BP-2 and other CIAT projects to aid in decision making for other crops and germplasm and for formulating research agenda. TSBF-CIAT in collaboration with ICRAF is already having projects that are going to use VNIR-DRS spectroscopy in soil characteristics mapping and developing markers for other soil attributes that are not yet characterized to aid TSBF-CIAT in technology up-scaling and out-scaling. Agreed. Yes indeed there are already lessons learnt from the soil fertility gradient research in TSBF-CIAT with results that have generic attributes that can aid in formulating cropping generic decision rules that can be applied to new areas with minimal validation as inputs to the ISFM approach. Further on this, work by TSBF-CIAT at the farm and the landscape levels have already been initiated in new project proposals one to SSA Challenge Program for the lake Kivu pilot learning site including Rwanda, Uganda and East DRC. Plans to scale up results of this pilot learning site to the other two sites (i.e. in West Africa and Southern Africa) are being discussed with FARA. The other project is with WFCP in which collective action on watersheds and larger landscapes are emphasized. Collaboration with PE-3, BP-2 and ERI will strengthen the understanding of landscape level interactions that will aid in the development of most appropriate impact pathways for land use decisions as well as for quantifying the impact magnitudes. emphasis on improving crop adaptation to soil acidity and other abiotic stresses.Agreed. CIAT intends to maintain a small Latin American soils research capacity supported mostly with regional funding sources while attempting to reinvigorate this line of research with a view to tapping funds to expand this work in the future. 14. CIAT needs to ensure that the administrative support systems allow TSBF to operate as an institute. Likewise, we recommend the inclusion of the CIAT Regional Coordinator for Africa as an ex oficio participant in the annual scientist evaluation and project development process so that he/she is fully informed and can contribute to team development, as well as linkages with other CIAT programs and potential donors. The Regional Coordinator should not have a staff evaluation authority for TSBF scientists.Partly agreed. There has been for some time an established exchange of visit from the administrative staff of CIAT-HQ to improve the financial management of TSBF-CIAT in Nairobi and the TSBF-CIAT administration staff periodically visit CIAT-HQ to familiarize with administrative and financial issues. There is an ongoing daily exchange of financial information through electronic means. Nonetheless, considerable effort remains to be made to further improve these systems. As for information exchange with the Regional Coordinator for Africa, besides ongoing information between the RCA and the Director of TSBF, there is also an annual joint meeting between CIAT Africa and TSBF-CIAT to coordinate implementation of joint projects. There are ongoing joint projects and new projects are being developed to integrate both CIAT and TSBF-CIAT research portfolios. Reporting relations are reviewed annually and will be modified as needed. 15. Decision Support Tools are an important component of crop, soil fertility and nutrient management research and extension. TSBF should ensure that some of its strategic research includes high-quality field studies and data collection that would allow to validate and further improve processbased DST such as crop simulation or more complete agroe-cosystem simulation models. Understanding of prediction uncertainties must be a key component of such research. • FTE = full time equivalent (person-years).• Senior staff time FTE = SS + SRF + VS time allocations to the each project.• Grant funding per senior staff FTE = includes restricted core, special projects and Challenge Programs.• Refereed journal publications per FTE senior staff = all journal articles published from the project (numbers provided by projects).• Senior staff journal publications track record = based on all refereed journal papers published by each SS, SRF or VS during 2002-2005/6(derived from CVs provided; only includes SS, SRF and VS with more than 2 years work in the project, also counting papers they have published from other work outside the projects reviewed here).* PE-1 = numbers are not fully correct because outputs from five SS with voluntary participation in PE-1 are included, whereas those SS have no official resources (inputs) allocated. A pro-forma FTE of 0.3/yr was included for this in the analysis, but this does not reflect the true contributions and still results in inflated estimates of students/FTE/yr and publications/FTE/yr. Senior staff journal publication track record is a better measure of scientific quality and directly comparable with the other projects. ","tokenCount":"10650"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0107693631.json b/data/part_2/0107693631.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b58e67d9b96cbd80e4c11dc370dd8f86c501f3a6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0107693631.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"695059b0655b7f998880efcaf10e1cf4","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/c08d74ae-fd5c-4236-b5a3-224ae0e50f97/retrieve","id":"1059150777"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"d8d5bf2a-2361-4c93-8345-7dcac89741f8","pagecount":"7","content":"The cMonic food-deficit situation in the province resulta in a cycle of poverty leading to hunger, and hunger leading to even greater poverty, which is very difficult to reverse. Because of its remoteness, very few assístance agencies are abre to work in the province.In response lO the food deficit in the region, FOCUS is implementing a relief programo The program has included the distribution of 10,000 tons of food aid to 250,000 people over the last years. Food rations were provided for every household in about half of the province. In sorne dístricta, food was provided in a food-for-work programo FOCUS ís able to carry out ¡ls activíties in Badakshan for several reasons: FOCUS is affiliated with the Aga Khan Development Network, wruch has been active in Tajikistan and Pakistan on the northem and southem borders of Badakshan. During the last three years, good working relationships bave been established with localleaders and wíth international organizations. A participatory model for rehabilitation comprising situation assessment, health, food assistance, village organization, agriculture, physical infrastructure, education, and economic initiatives is being considered.Only 2% of eastern Badakshan is suitable for agriculture, and its soil quality is ofien poor and deficient in nutrients. A large portion of the agriculture is based on irrígation from rivers and torrents. Extensive systems of irrígation ehanne1s have been developed by the communities over centuries, bringing water long distances along tbe mountainsides. Tbere is also a considerable amount of farrning tbat depends on moisture from rainfall and melting snow, which ís less productive.Tbe general constraínts on crop and livestock production in tbe area include the followíng:• lack of access to good, pure seed for cereal crops• lack andlor cost of inputs such as fertilizers and plant-protection materials• diseases, pests, and weeds• lack of írrígation water and the state of tbe water system• remoteness of markets and lack of transport facilities• lack of agricultural and livestock services• taxes (generally as a part of their crop yield)• displacement of technical staff and farrners and destruction of institutionsIn all formal and informal agricultural surveys, the farrners' priorities have always been fertilizers and good seed of improved varieties. Most farrners are aware of tbe possibilities of increasing their production through these inputs, especially fertilizers. The soH is generally very shallow and lacks sufficient nutrients to support intensive crop production. Witb shortages of fuel, especially firewood, most of tbe available animal dung is used for cooking and for heating in winter. Tbe population of trees remaining is barely sufficient for watershed purposes and needs to be replenished. Lack of sufficíent fodder for feeding livestock during the winter also limits tbe amount of animal dung available for the household. Small amounts of fertílizers are sometimes available in the markets but are usually of poor quality and very costly. Mos! farrners lack resources at planting time and have to pay hígh ínterest to borrow money for purchasing small amounts offertilízer against the expected harvest.Tbe attitude of farrners towards weeds ís ratber tolerant, as many are abo seen as serving a useful purpose. At a certain level, weeds in tbe wheat are considered to improve the quality oftbe straw as fodder. Tbe presence of sorne wild rye is saíd to improve the quality ofbread. Wild mustard is harvested separately by tbe women and processed for lamp and cooking oí!. Sorne families consume plants of edible specíes weeded in tbe fields, such as Chenopodium spp.Wheat is a staple food in all the cornmunities of eastern Badakshan and is grown on botb irrígated and rain-fed land. Altitude and snow cover tends to dictate whether wheat is sown as a spring or an autumn crop. Wakhan, Ishkashem, Zebak, and southern Sheghnan grow mostly spring wheat, whíle nortbern Sheghnan and Darwaz grow winter wheat.Overall, wheat yields per hectare vary from 0.5 to 2.0 tons under itrigation and from 0.3 to 0.7 tons in rain-fed areas. Tbe yields vary enormously with location, altitude, soil quality, the availabilíty of farrnyard manure (chemical fertilizer in tbe area is a rarity), susceptibílity to fungal diseases such as rust and smut, pests such as locusts, weeds, and the gene tic origin and purity of the seed planted.Little or no íntroduction of ímproved varieties had taken place in eastern Badakshan prior lO 1979. AfghanAid has recently estahlished demonstration plots of ímproved varietíes from the Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo (CIMMYT) as part of an integrated development program in Badakhshan, including the districts ofIshkashem and Zebak Almost all farmers grow a number landraces tbat are onocal origin and of very mixed appearance, ofien heavily infested wilh weeds, particularly wild wheat, wild oats and mU5tard. Sorkhak, an indigenous red-grained wheat, 15 generally planted in Ihe autumn, while safidak, an amber/light-grained wheat, is planted in the spring. A few farmers have par! oftheír fields under seed from other districts, inc1uding from Pakistan and Tajikistan. Sorne ofthis is of ímproved origín but by now very mixed wilh other varieties and weeds.In Darwaz, different types of wheat are cultivated wilh different lengths of straw, sorne wilh awns and sorne awnless. Winter-wheat types c1early owe their origin to Russian varieties and to the facultative varieties introduced elsewhere in the province under various United Nation and aid programs. Local cultivars are almost exclusive1y sown on rain-fed land. .Seed security (farmers' access to adequate, good-quality seed oftbe desired type at Ihe right time) is the first defense for food security (the access by all people at all times to enough food to maintaín an active and healthy life). This is especially true for war-torn Afghanistan in general and for neglected Badakhshan in particular. As recognized at the World Food Surnmit held in Rome (F AO 1996), poverty and impoverishment precondition people to a state of vulnerability-vulnerable to life-cycle hunger, vulnerable to seasonal hunger, and vulnerable to the impact of disaster. Thís also, describes the state of food security today in eastern Badakshan,The loss of access lo seeds and food are ofien interconnected. While seeds are crucial to agricultural recovery, human energy í5 equally important. Seed reHef is being viewed as an integral par! of the emergency package. There are several examples from other parts of tbe world that show that tbe action taken to restore seed security quickly afier disaster is an effective way to help restore food security in an area. During Ihe 1991192 drought in Soutbern Africa, an emergency seed-production project,jointly coordinated by the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and tbe International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), was highly successful compared to tbe projects in which seed was imported. Their success was due to the distribution of better-quality adapted varieties. The Seeds ofHope initiative helped rebuild domestic food security through the rehabilítation of seed security following tbe civil war in Rwanda in 1994. Adapted varieties and landraces were assembled and multiplied in neighboring countries and reintroduced into Rwanda.The seed program aims to ensure avaílability of the right kínd of seed in tbe right place. Adapted varieties are obtaíned from similar agroclimatic conditions in Tajikistan and delivered across the Panj River lo severa! distribution points. Transportation within Afghanistan i5 mostly by volunteers, by donkeys made avaílable by the cornmunities for tbis purpose. This helps to keep the costs of introducing tbe varieties to a minimum. The amounts being distributed have been mínimized to enable the local seed-production and -distribution systems to continue functioning smoothly.Early in spring ofthis year, seeds ofhígh-yielding varieties ofwheat, maíze, otber cereals, potatoes, and vegetables appropriate to the agroecological conditions of the area were introduced through on-farm, fanner-managed observation sites in the target districts. Al! the villages in the Wakhan, Ishkashem, Zebak, Sheghnan, and Darwaz districts are participating. The farmers are selected through village committees, traditionally known as shuras. Attempts are being made to involve as many differen! farmers as possible by restricting the distribution of only one kind of crop commodity to each participating farmer.lnitially, for each kind of erop, varieties that are widely adapted and available in sufficien! quantity are being introduced. Ihis will be followed by varieties and landraces witb superior traits 5uch as higher yield, better adaptability, improved disease and pest resistance and stress tolerance, and more consumer acceptability. In future, dífferent kinds oflentils, forages, fiuit and timber trees, and herbs of medicinal value will also be íntroduced ínto the farmíng systems. It ís expected tbat the introductíon of useful germplasm will be repeated every growíng season whenever new potentíal rnaterials are available and tbe farmers-through their village eommíttees-are in favor of it.Rather tban replacing existing germplasrn, the goal is to increase the range of germplasrn available on-fann. This will contribute to enhancing on-farm genetie diversity arnong and within different erop specles.The ernphasis is on fanner and communíty ernpowerment. Participating fanners and theír neíghbors wiUjudge the usefulness oftbe rnaterials being introduced and tbeir subsequent rnultiplication and distribution. Fanner-to-farrner seed exchange forms tbe basis oftbe local seed system in the region. It is a part ofthe local culture tbat anyone with seed of irnproved varieties is obliged to share the seed produced at the first harvest with his extended family. Such acts of cooperatíon reinforce family ties witb distant blood relatives. In sorne cases, extra amounts of seed will be distributed on credit if tbe dernand for tbe varieties introduced cannot be met by tbe local seed systems. Credít systerns in wruch fanners pay for tbe inputs al harvest are also being used for supplying fertilizers.These activities will be gradually transformed into participatory breeding, allowing tbe cornrnunity to gain full control over the type and セ ュ ッ オ ョ エ @ of varieties being produced and exchanged witb tbeir neighbors. Participation in tbe management and decision rnaking for seed security by the farming community will contribute to reestablishing local food security and peace in the area.Maize is one ofthe tbree most important cereal crops in the world. Global annual maize production nowexceeds 550 million toos. Oflhat, approximately 100 millíon tons are used directly for human food (CIMMYT 1999). Maíze is growíng in importance in Asia, primarily as a feed for animals. Nevertheless, there are significant areas of Ihe regíon where maíze is still the dominan! cereal in the human dieto In Nepal, for example, ofthe 1.4 míllíon toos produced annually, it is estimated thal 86% ís used directly as human food (CIMMYT 1999). The development ofhybrids ís one ofthe maín reasons for the phenomenal advances in maize productivity tbroughout !he world in Ihe past few decades. In mosl developed countries, the area planted lo hybrids approaches 100% of allland planted to como Growth in the use ofhybrids has been impressive in areas ofthe developing world as well. For example, 60% and 46% ofthe area planted to maíze is sown lo hybrids in Thailand and Vietnam, respectively. 80th within Asia and globally, there is a significant negative correlation between the percent utilization of maize for human food and the use of improved varieties (CIMMYT 1999). Ihis can partial1y be explained by the fact that subsistence farmers have limited cash and are reluctant to pay the premium price associated with improved seeds, particularly hybrid seed, which must be purchased each year. Single-cross hybrid seed in Asia costs on average US $3.12 per kg, in comparison to US $0.69 per kg for open-pollinated varieties (OPVs) (Gerpacio 1999). The development ofOPV s for areas of the world where maize is grown as a subsistenee erop makes good sense. Compared to hybrids, OPV seed is more readily produced, it can be made available to farmers at a lower cost, and ít can be generated by farmers themselves. Nevertheless, in large areas of the world where maize is a subsistence food erop, a large percentage ofthe area is no! planted to improved varieties (OPVs or hybrids) even though modern varieties with excellent adaptation are available from both the public and private sectors. The poor adoption of improved maize varieties can be attributed to many factors, primary among whieh may be the lack ofviable seed enterprises.Other factors, such as the varieties' lacking the eharacteristics that are important to farmers, also constrain adoption. Farmers in Nepal for example, prefer the-tr own varieties because they are ear-Iier, have better husk cover and culinary characteristies than improved OPVs. In order to improve adoption of modem varietíes, there is a need for greater farmer input ¡nto the development of genotypes that take these preferences into account. Thls paper discusses issues relative to developing and providing improved maize genotypes to farmers and describes a get111plasm-improvement scheme adopted by the National Maíze Research Program in Nepal to ensure that the products they develop are better targeted to the requirements of farmers.Maize is cross-pollinated under normal cireumstances. Therefore, a crop or plot of a desrred genotype must be earefully managed if the seed it produces is to be genetieally pureo Furthermore, in relatíon to participatory approaches lo plant breedíng it means that seed of genotypes !hat are tested or demonstrated in farmers' fields in a typical small plot are likely to be contaminated or genetically altered through the inflow of foreign pollen. Saved seed will, therefore, not produce a phenotype idcntícal to tbat observed the previous season. In a varietal-improvement program, be it through informal farmer selection or through a forrnally organized plant-breeding program, success is determined by the abílity of the breeder to find desirable charaeteristics and fix them in the population so that they can be expressed in subsequent generations. For traits that do not exist or that have little expression in an otherwÍse desirable populatíon, eonventional breedíng programs have a substantial competitive advantage over farmer-Ied approaches. In order to find favorable alleles for stress toleranee, for example, many thousands oflines and populatíons might need to be sereened in order to identif'y a few genotypes with the desired characteristics. Similarly, for alleles tbat are found in a very low frequency in a population, breeding techniques that inc\\ude selfing and extensive testing with reeombination of best lines can be used to increase their expression relatívely quickIy.Developing OPVs through conventional methods requires both time and land resourees. As an example, the following steps are required to develop a superior experimental variety using full-sibs developed from an improved population (which itself may have been improved through many cycles of selectíon). First, 250 full-sib progenies are generated by hand-pollinatíon. Ihese are tested in up to six locations, including sites where a stress of interest is presento Next, eight to 10","tokenCount":"2391"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0109580889.json b/data/part_2/0109580889.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d28ba449e9c3258e04c82680d9f528ebda5e44c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0109580889.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e810cf528126f873853a7c2b940f044e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/260d28e5-dcdf-494e-b8ac-ced1bf5b0b2f/retrieve","id":"909429838"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"95149e1c-ae4e-4e8d-8bdd-f8521ba72dd2","pagecount":"1","content":"The African Research in Sustainable Intensification for the Next Generation (Africa RISING) comprise three research for-development projects for West Africa, East and Southern Africa, and the Ethiopian highland supported by the United States Agency for International Development as part of the U.S. government's Feed the Future Initiative. Africa RISING in East and Southern Africa is being implemented in Tanzania, Malawi and Zambia.Tanzania and Malawi and soon, Zambia Tanzania Project sites:The project is being implemented in Babati and Kiteto districts in Manyara region of northern Tanzania and Kongwa district in Dodoma region, central Tanzania (Figure 1). The action sites were selected to acknowledge agroecological differences, allow appropriate targeting of technologies and strategies, and complement the development efforts of another USAID-supported program, the Tanzania Staples Value Chain (NAFAKA) project.The key constraints to agricultural productivity identified in these areas include poor soil fertility, limited access to improved seeds, climate variability, pest and disease infestations, low mechanization, weak linkages between research/extension and farmers, insufficient knowledge about healthy human nutrition, inadequate agroprocessing, and poor markets. For livestock, the challenges include in availability of improved breeds and better pasture and fodder species, overstocking, pests and diseases, conflicts between livestock keepers and farmers, and wildlife -livestock conflict among others. Africa RISING will, through a participatory approach, prioritize the challenges to address over time, allowing the sequencing and targeting of technologies to continually enhance farm-level outcomes.Through participatory action research, the project is identifying and pretesting the best management practices for integrating crops, livestock and land management, and linking farming and marketing practices to nutrition and health. These will then be widely disseminated by development partners for scaling up and wider adoption in the project area and beyond to significantly impact on food security, nutrition, farm incomes, and environmental sustainability. These practices comprise of single technologies or varied combinations of: Africa RISING aims to enhance farmers' knowledge and support intensification to increase productivity in maizelegume farming systems, beginning with integrating technologies that address soil and land degradation.The research in Malawi is coordinated by Michigan State University and builds on its past successes of promoting legume-diversified farming systems in northern Malawi through participatory action research using 'mother-baby' adaptive trials as platforms for knowledge dissemination.Mother trials: The researchers set up 'mother trials' on lead farmers' fields that demonstrate an array of existing technologies and technology combinations for sustainable intensification. These are:• Intensified grain legume production as sole crops in rotation with cereals or using various maize/legume intercropping options, and a unique intercropping of two grain legumes based on their complementary growth characteristics and plant architecture. This 'doubleup legume' technology hinges on pigeon pea's unique growth habit compared to the potential under-storey companion crops (groundnut, soybean, cowpea, beans), which ensures enhanced soil fertility benefits and grain for better nutrition. • Soil fertility and soil health management through application of organic, inorganic, or a mixture of both fertilizers, use of cover crops and short fallow rotation with green manure. Adaptive baby trials: Members of the farmers' groups involved in setting up the mother trials select their preferred Africa RISING Research Action Sites (sections) in Malawi options and set up 'baby trials' for experimentation on their farms. Livestock integration and intensification: While the livestock density in Malawi is very low, the project is exploring options for enhancing productivity across the interventions sites among the farmers who own livestock.Katete, Chipata, Lundazi districts in Eastern Province Challenges: low soil fertility conditions, frequent droughts, farmers can only make limited use of high yielding varieties and inorganic fertilizer, lack of capital and assets to invest in improved production methods. \"Through this project we want to increase the productivity of smallholder farms while paying careful attention to avoid any negative environmental impacts and also address some of the challenges we are currently facing due to climate change. We want to use science to bring about a Green Revolution but avoid the negative consequences that are often overlooked.\"USAID Senior Sustainable Agricultural Systems Advisor Africa","tokenCount":"654"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0109849062.json b/data/part_2/0109849062.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d35b844e9a1a7ebccec1cdac19301e7ad3a9cb93 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0109849062.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"48c64b19e56b842302a092b8989f8e57","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/274d8ed0-358e-49e9-89da-327c1b29ede9/retrieve","id":"-1901966257"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"c47ad130-1a60-4473-bd94-e8134f56e6b1","pagecount":"22","content":"Annex 2 v Characterisation of crop-livestock production system and potential for improving productivity through improved feeding in Rubavu district, western province, RwandaThe study was conducted in Kanyundo cell in Rubavu District in Western Province of Rwanda. The main objective was to characterize the crop-livestock farming system using the Feed Assessment Tool (FEAST). Data was collected using focus group discussions (FGD) and individual interviews with farmers. The FGD was carried out with 16 participants (9 female). Farmers in Rubavu District practice zero grazing; they use a cut-and-carry system with forage from their farms or roadsides. The key issue is inadequate capital to construct cowsheds where animals could be tethered during feeding. Feed scarcity is a major issue and the quality of feedstuff (forage/pasture) is generally low. This is due to lack of knowledge on cultivating suitable forage and sub-optimal management, conservation and use of locally available feed resources (crop residues and all other resources). The problems mentioned by farmers may be used as entry points for further interventions in Kanyundo cell of Mudende sector.Livestock is an important part of the farming systems and other socioeconomic activities in Rwanda. Extensive, semiintensive and intensive systems of livestock farming are all practiced within the country. However, the availability of sufficient and quality feed resources in Rubavu District varies greatly throughout the year, depending on climatic conditions, particularly rainfall and the length of growing season. In addition, the limited farming land, limited use of byproducts in animal feeding, insufficient and non-controlled commercial feeds lower the level of animal production (MINAGRI 2012).The Feed Assessment Tool (FEAST) was used to characterise livestock production systems and locally available feed resources in Rubavu District. Kanyundo cell, Mudende sector of Rubavu District of Rwanda was selected in order to identify farming system constraints for livestock production, assess feed resources and propose suitable interventions in the district. The survey was conducted in cooperation with farmers affiliated with the Rwanda Dairy Development Project (RDDP) in collaboration with International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).The survey was conducted in Kanyundo cell, Rubavu District in Western Province of Rwanda located at an altitude of 1,780 meters above sea level. The total population of Rubavu District is 403,662 (about 208,673 are female) (Republic of Rwanda 2017). Rubavu District is densely populated with 1,039 inhabitant/km 2 and Kanyundo cell has 835 households. Data was collected using focus group discussion and individual interviews with selected farmers. Selection criteria included involvement in the crop-livestock farming system, landholding capacity, milk production zone, cattle population density and availability of feed resources. The focus group discussion was done with 16 representative participants (9 female) while individual interviews were administered to nine farmers representing each of the three farm sizes (small, medium and large) in Kanyundo, Muyange, Rubavu, Rebero, Nyamirama and Mugongo villages. Small farms were defined as farmlands with less than 0.5 ha of land, medium farms are between 0.5 and 1.0 ha and large farms had above 1 ha of land. The geographic coordinates (longitude, latitude and elevation) of the site were recorded using GPS. The assessment was conducted in February 2019. The information from the focus group was summarized and data from individual interviews were processed through the FEAST software (https://www.ilri.org/ feast).Figure 2: Group discussion with selected farmersThe majority (45%) of farmers in Kanyundo cell own medium landholdings used mainly for crop cultivation (Table 1). About 30% of the households had less than 0.5 ha land. The average number of household members is six. Cropping seasonsGenerally, in Rwanda, there are three agricultural seasons that correspond to the rainfall patterns. The first season is from September-December, the second season is from January-June and the third season is from July to mid-September (Table 2). The dominant food and fodder crops grown in Kanyundo cell are potato, maize, common beans and cowpea. The average area of land used for each of these crops is shown in Figure 3. Farmers in this area have small areas of land to cultivate and potatoes are the main crop grown in the area while maize is mainly grown in rotation with potato as a dual-purpose crop to provide green maize for food and green stover for livestock. Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) is the only fodder crop grown in the area. A relatively large area is allocated to Napier by large farmers whereas medium and small landholding farmers grow it on limited border areas surrounding crop lands. Apart from Napier grass, some farmers revealed that they grow maize and harvest it at \"milk\" stage for animal feeding. Most farmers rely on collected fodder, Napier grass and crop residues for animal feed.In Kanyundo, farmers keep different types of livestock such as cattle and goats and the majority of farmers raise improved cattle (crossbreed of Friesian) as shown in Figure 4. The main reason for raising cattle is milk, manure and income generation.Animals are raised in different systems that involve stall feeding in poor cowsheds and open grazing. Farmers use maize stover, bean haulms and vegetable waste as livestock feed when they are available mainly after harvest. Farmers do not offer supplement feeds to their animals and storing of crop residues for feeding during time of scarcity is not common in the area. The average daily labour cost ranged from FRw1,000-1,200 1 for most households. The activities are shared based on gender, whereby ploughing, manure transportation, cowshed cleaning, seeding, harvesting water, weeding and sowing are dedicated to women. The activities mainly done by men are milking, manure application, drug application, bush clearing and cut and carry of forage.The income of farmers is derived from various sources (Figure 5). Food crops account for 37% followed by off-farm business (27%), labour (23%) and livestock (13%). Diseases affecting animals are mastitis, anaplasmosis and East Coast fever (ECF). The services provided by different veterinary service providers are drugs, vaccines and artificial insemination (AI). These services are provided by government animal resource officers and private veterinarians. The amounts paid for these services range from FRw5,000-10,000 for treatment while AI service costs FRw3000. Vaccines cost FRw300. Most households use artificial insemination (62.5%) while bull service is also used (37.5%).The top two feed resources that contribute to dry matter (DM), metabolizable energy (ME) and crude protein (CP) content of dairy cattle feeding in Rubavu District are cultivated and collected fodder. In terms of DM, cultivated fodder contributes about 54% while collected fodder accounts for 40% (Figure 6A). The primary ME source for dairy cattle in the district is also cultivated fodder, contributing to 54% of the ME intake in smallholder dairy cattle (Figure 6B). About 62% of crude protein is supplied by cultivated fodder (Figure 6C). Farmers purchase small amounts of feeds throughout the year but the contribution is generally insignificant. Grazing does not contribute as most smallholder dairy farmers adopt a zero grazing system. The dominant purchased feed types by most households are maize thinnings, green maize stover and dry residues. The average amount purchased for green maize is estimated to be around 67 kg per year per household while the corresponding figure for crop residues is around 9 kg (Figure 7).Cropping 37%Labour 23%Figure 7: Average quantities of feed purchased per household over the yearFigure 8 shows rainfall pattern and the corresponding availability of different feed resources for smallholder dairy farmers in Rubavu District. According to the information collected from farmers, the highest rainfall occurs in March and November. During that period, farmers have full access to green forage and the chance to increase milk production. The months with the lowest rainfall are July and August, during which farmers face critical feed shortage in both quantity and quality to feed their animals. Green forage is the dominant feed source throughout the year. Crop residues, which include dried maize stover, green maize biomass and potato haulms are also important feed sources used by smallholder dairy farmers for a period of seven months. Due to the extremely small pieces of land used for cultivation, the primary source of feed for livestock is fodder collected from field margins, weeds and thinnings. Rainwater harvesting techniques are applied in the area to increase water availability from June-August. The main challenges faced by farmers in Kanyundo cell are lack of standard cowshed, quality feed, water shortage, low quality of improved breeds and low milk price (Table 3). The first set of challenges mentioned by farmers was lack of cowshed (due to the expansion of cultivation land that limited land for building cowshed), conflict between farmers, low capital and the tradition of farmers in keeping their animals inside the living quarters. The second set of main problems mentioned included shortage of feed due to lack of skills and knowledge in conservation of forage and crop residues to be used in dry season and lack of enough land for cultivation of both food crops and forages. Water shortage observed during dry seasons was put in third place. Most farmers lack knowledge of rainwater harvesting technologies, and river and tap water sources are limited in the surveyed area. Lack of improved dairy cattle genetic supply is also among the challenges smallholder farmers face in Rubavu District. In Rubavu District, Kanyundo cell, land used for cultivated fodder is reducing mainly due to increasing human population and encroachment on land reserved for growing food crops for livestock. This leads to a decrease in animal production. The potential intervention to curb this problem is intercropping grasses with other crops. Most farmers rely on collected fodder to feed their livestock and this needs to be improved by integrating suitable perennial cultivated forages into the cropping system, particularly in niches that are not used for cropping, such as ditches and terraces. Farmers can also overcome feed problems by plating annual forage crops such as oats, maize, sorghum and vetch.The farmers in the surveyed area do not use concentrates, which leads to a reduction in milk production and overall performance. Thus, there is need to support and motivate farmers to enable them to buy concentrates. However, low milk prices are a disincentive for farmers to invest in purchasing supplementary feed. Table 4 shows the potential of different interventions in relation to their capacity to solve specific feed challenges and relevance to smallholder dairy commodity. The characterisation of the crop-livestock farming system was conducted in Kanyundo cell, Rubavu District located in Western Province of Rwanda, where the farming systems is dominated by crop and livestock mixed subsistence farming.Based on the survey findings, households rely on cropping as their major source of income. Most households use collected fodder for feeding their animals and do not frequently purchase concentrate feeds. The milk production is constrained by:• inefficient production related to poor housing, breeds, diseases and water scarcity• weak genetic improvement extension system with low conception rate in the areaTo mitigate these constraints, different interventions are recommended:• Improve cut and carry systems (cut from cultivated fodder field under rainfed) and intercropping legumes with crops• Support farmers to establish associations that enable them to buy processed feed in bulk.• Promote cultivated forages which can adopt to the environment in western zones• Increase the use of crop residues, e.g. maize drying on the fields to be used and conserved for animal feed mainly in the dry season• Improve the efficiency of AI service by supporting private investment in AI• Support local milk processing and install milk feeding programs at school and village levels and advocate to increase milk price. ","tokenCount":"1891"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0111837383.json b/data/part_2/0111837383.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..607ddba72a7524482b91ea34ddb676589d5815db --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0111837383.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b619a7c6311b8a9c449b9ba3ecbc9a24","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/8b713999-6b5b-4033-b825-ced4024eda39/retrieve","id":"-925520701"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b78c7a19-189c-46e9-adf7-1d156e3c13c9","pagecount":"37","content":"To the Board of Governors of International Water Management InstituteWe have audited the accompanying statement of the financial position of International Water Management Institute as at 3 1'' December 2005 and the related statement of activities, changes in net assets and cash flows for the year then ended, together with the accounting policies and notes as set out on pages 3 to 24.The institute's management is responsible for preparing and presenting these financial statements in accordance with the recommendations made in the Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research(CGIAR) financial Guidelines series No.2 CGIAR Accounting policies and Reporting practices manual (revised March 2004).0ur responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements, based on our audit.We conducted our audit in accordance with the International Standards on Auditing, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about weather the said financial statements are free . from material misstatement. An audit includes examining, 'on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the said financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the institute's management, evaluating the overall presentation of thehancial statements, and determining whether the said financial statements are prepared' and presented in accordance with the recommendations made in the CGIAR Guidelines. We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit. We therefore believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.In our opinion, so far as appears from our examination, the institute maintained proper books of account for the year ended 31\" December>2005, and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said financial position and related statements of activities, changes in net assets, cash flows and the accounting policies and notes thereto, which are in agreement with said books and have been prepared and presented in accordance with the recommendations made in the CGIAR financial Guidelines Series No 2-CGIAR Accounting polices and Reporting Practices manual(revised March 2004) and give a true and fair view of the Institute's state of affairs as at 31\" December 2005 and of its activities and cash flows for the year then ended. Supplementary information on pages 25 to 35 are not a required part of the financial statements and have not been subjected to audit procedures applied in the audihof the financial statements. The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of these financial statements are set out below:1The financial statements are prepared and presented in accordance with the recommendations made in the CGIAR Financial Guidelines Series, N0.2: Accounting Policies and Reporting Practices Manual (March 2004).The financial statements are prepared under the historical cost convention.Transactions denominated in currencies other than reporting currency, US Dollars, are translated to US Dollars at the rates of exchange prevailing at the beginning of the month in which the transaction took place.Monetary assets and liabilities expressed in currencies other than US Dollars are translated to US Dollars at the rates of exchange prevailing at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary items denominated in foreign currency which are carried at cost is reported using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction.All exchange gains or losses resulting from such translations are treated as other revenues and support or other losses and expenses in the statement of activities.3 Revenue Revenue is the gross inflow of economic benefits during the period arising in the course of the ordinary activities of a Center where those inflow result in increase in net assets.Grants to the Centre may be categorized as either unrestricted or restricted.Unrestricted Grants Unrestricted grants refer to the revenue arising from the unconditional transfer of cash and other resources to the Center. Unrestricted grants are recognized as income for the year in which they have been pledged.Restricted Grants Restricted grants refer to the revenue arising from a transfer of resources to the Center in return for past or future compliance relating to the activities of the Center.Accounting Policies (contd..)Restricted grants as well as conditional promises to give grants are recognized as revenue only upon or until the conditions relating to its operating activities have been substantially met or the donor has explicitly waived the conditions.Revenue includes only the gross inflow received and receivable by the Center on its own account.Gross inflow of economic benefits include amounts collected on behalf of the principal and which do not result in an increase in the net assets are treated as \"Agency Transactions\" and are not recognized as revenue. Revenue is treated as the amount of any commission or management fee received.When the outcome of a transaction involving the rendering of services can be measured reliably, revenue associated with the transaction is recognized by reference to the stage of completion of the transaction at the balance sheet date.When the outcome of the transaction cannot be estimated reliably, revenue should be recognized only to the extent of the expenses recognized that are recoverable.Cash grants are recorded at the face value of the cash received or the US dollar equivalent.Grants in kind are recorded at the fair value of the assets (or services) received or promised, or fair value of the liabilities satisfied.Other Revenues Other revenues and gains are recognized in the period in which they are earned.Expenses Expenses are recognized when a decrease in future economic benefits related to a decrease in an asset or an increase in a liability has arisen that can be measured reliably.The Centre is exempt from income tax under the provisions of Section 8 of the Inland Revenue Act No28 of 1979 of Sri Lanka. The Centre is also exempt from USA (United States of America) tax under Section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of the United States of America, as an organization described in Section 501 (c)(3).Accounting Policies (Contd..) 7 Inventories Inventories are valued at the lower of acquisition cost or net realizable value and charged when used. The acquisition cost includes the purchase price plus cost of freight, insurance and handling charges. Cost is determined by the First In First Out (FIFO) method.Provision is made where necessary for obsolete, slow moving and defective items.All individual tangible assets of US$ 500 or over in cost with an estimated useful life beyond one year are treated as fixed assets and designated property, plant and equipment. These are stated at cost. The cost of an item comprises its purchase price and all other incidental cost in bringing the asset to its working condition for its intended use.Property, plant and equipment acquired through the use of grants restricted for a certain project should be recorded as assets. Such assets are depreciated at a rate of 100% and the depreciation expense charged directly to the appropriate restricted project.Depreciation is recognized for all property, plant and equipment owned by the Center based on the full acquisition cost of the property, plant and equipment, net of salvage value.The straight-line method of depreciation is applied consistently from period to period unless altered circumstances justifL a change.The principal annual rates used for this purpose are:Heavy-duty equipment When property, plant and equipment are sold, the cost as well as the accumulated depreciation is removed from the books; any gain or loss from the sale is charged as other gains or losses.Depreciation of required assets is charged in the month the asset was placed in operation and is continued until the asset is fully depreciated or its use was discontinued.Accounting Policies (contd..) 8Subsequent expenditure relating to property, plant and equipment that has already been recognized are only added to the carrying amount of the asset when the expenditure improves the condition of the net asset beyond its original assessed standards of performance. All other subsequent expenditure are recognized as an expense in the period in which it is incurred.The initial lease agreement with IWMI and Government of Sri Lanka is for 25 years commencing from 1990. IWMI has the right to negotiate for extension of the lease period under the lease agreement upon the expiry of the current lease.Leasehold property and improvements thereon are amortised over the lease period or if shorter, the useful economic life of the property or improvement concerned.Receivables are stated at the amounts they are estimated to realize.When an Accounts Receivable -Donor, was deemed doubtful of collection, a provision is made based on past experiences and on continuing review of receivable aging reports and other relevant factors.Terminal Benefits (a) Severance and Gratuity.In accordance with the terms and conditions of recruitment, internationally recruited staff members are entitled to terminal benefits referred to as \"Severance\" on the completion of 3 full years of continuous service. Provision is made for \"Severance\" payable for all international staff members..Provision is made in the financial statements for gratuity benefits payable under the Centre's personnel policies to the nationally recruited staff. Nationally recruited staff qualify for gratuity on the completion of 5 years continuous service with the Centre. It is the policy of the Centre to recognize the liability for such benefits payable from the date of employment.Accounting Policies (contd..) (b) Repatriation In accordance with the terms and conditions of recruitment, internationally recruited staff members are entitled to repatriation benefits on the completion of contract period. Provision is made for repatriation payable for all international staff members based on the estimated cost of air fare, relocation charges, and fieight charges. purposes, such as a reserve for the future acquisition of property and equipment. Post balance sheet events No events have occurred since the balance sheet date which would require adjustment to or disclosure in the financial statements.Comparative figures Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to the presentation of the current year. ","tokenCount":"1616"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0122784804.json b/data/part_2/0122784804.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ff82ae8b335868645729b9ba0354ae6e4f8938be --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0122784804.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"8bec953c430471112ddea520954ff7f4","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/afcc7bbb-f43f-4acf-891c-44d4a0f3b458/retrieve","id":"188154066"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"220fe5c1-f914-4a84-a9d7-2bc1a95685f6","pagecount":"280","content":"This document, prepared under the overall leadership of Mark Rosegrant with Ruth Meinzen-Dick and Maximo Torero, has benefited enormously from a range of written and oral comments at different stages of the writing process. The feedback on the initial concept note from anonymous external reviewers from other CGIAR centers and academic institutions was critical to the restructuring of the document and the writers' efforts to clarify their research programs. The comments from the e-consultation stimulated new thoughts, many of which are incorporated in the proposal. In addition, the diverse participants at the Addis Ababa meeting (researchers, donors, NGO representatives, government officials, and businesspeople) provided excellent feedback in different sessions. Several people also provided additional written comments on the full document that were particularly helpful: David Spielman and Ewa Sobczynska of IFPRI and Victor Manyong and colleagues at IITA. Pascale Sabbagh was instrumental in drafting the January, May, and October revisions of the document, and Susan Buzzelli contributed ideas and editing on key sections.The September document was compiled and edited by Deborah Rubin and Cristina Manfre (Cultural Practice LLC), the January submission was edited by Mary Jane Banks, the May submission benefited from the input of Rajul Pandya-Lorch and was edited by Heidi Fritschel, and the October submission was edited by Steve Williams and Heidi Fritschel.Last but not least, special appreciation is due to Nancy White, Owner of Full Circle Associates (http://www.fullcirc.com/about/) and her global support team-Simone Staiger, Stephan Dorn, David Shepard, and Alex White-who offered technical support to e-consultation participants in the discussion and solved technological glitches. Nancy's facilitation of the e-consultation and in Addis Ababa not only depicted the discussions that occurred colorfully and creatively, but also showed how the visual representation of ideas can support clearer thinking.Table 2.1-How CRP2 subthemes contribute to the system-level outcomes of the CGIAR .. The Comparative Advantage of CRP2 CRP2 will for the first time bring together analysis of policies and institutions related to food security, poverty, and sustainable agriculture from across the CGIAR. It will combine research expertise in both the social and the biophysical sciences at key CGIAR centers to find ways to enhance agricultural productivity while reducing rural poverty and improving outcomes for the environment.The CGIAR and its partners are well placed to provide the research laid out in CRP2. Although many institutions work on issues related to policies, institutions, and markets in developing countries, the CGIAR has a comparative advantage based on its specific mandate related to the intersection of food security, poverty, and sustainable agriculture; its focus on research-based capacity building in the public, private, civil society, and academic sectors; its institutional and political independence; its scale (large enough to generate an intellectual critical mass but nimble enough to flexibly adjust to emerging needs); its recognized research capabilities; and its large network for data collection in developing countries.Other institutions possess some of these characteristics, but the combination of all of them is unique to the CGIAR.The program will be a platform of excellence, drawing on expertise not only within the CGIAR system, but also in many other research and development organizations and agencies worldwide. The challenges facing the rural poor are large and complex. As one of the largest research programs focused on food policy for the rural poor in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, CRP2 will be well positioned to identify solutions for improving policies, institutions, and markets in ways that will improve the lives of millions of rural poor people.The CGIAR seeks to achieve four system-level outcomes: (1) reduced rural poverty; (2) increased food security; (3) improved nutrition and health; and (4) more sustainable management of natural resources. CRP2 will contribute to all four of these outcomes, with an emphasis on the first two, through activities related to three overall themes: Effective Policies and Strategic Investments (Theme 1): This theme will improve policy options at the global, regional, and country levels by modeling scenarios of future trends, analyzing how best to allocate public resources for research and investment, and strengthening governments' capacity to design and carry out policies and investments that will increase agricultural productivity and enhance rural incomes. Inclusive Governance and Institutions (Theme 2): This theme will examine the scope for policy, institutional, and governance reforms and contribute to effective and equitable access to rural services, property rights, collective action, and assets by studying existing systems and testing institutional innovations in these areas. Linking Small Producers to Markets (Theme 3): This theme will increase the competitiveness of markets to benefit producers and consumers and offer greater income opportunities by integrating small-scale producers into upgraded value chains.These themes, which were determined after an analysis of development challenges in different types of countries and a priority-setting consultation with key stakeholders, are interlinked (see Figure 1). Policies set the enabling environment for effective agricultural growth; institutions structure the delivery of goods and services and the context for action; and markets organize the relationships among valuechain actors, including smallholder producers. Given these linkages, working across the themes will allow CRP2 researchers to address key challenges and opportunities related to policies, institutions, and markets.The CRP2 team developed current research areas and priorities through a participatory process and an analysis of the major development challenges and strategies for each type of region. Research priorities among activities and regions will be further developed and adjusted at the beginning of the program implementation phase. The team will organize participatory priority-setting workshops, applying a multicriteria scoring approach, and complement these consultations with a modeling approach that uses quantitative ex ante assessment tools. These activities will result in a ranking of priority research areas and regions aimed at optimizing CRP2's contribution to the system-level outcomes.CRP2 will help achieve CGIAR system-level outcomes through three main impact pathways (see Figure 2):1. Informing and enriching research and bolstering the capacity of research communities 2. Influencing policy development and implementation by major development agencies 3. Providing policy recommendations for policymakers and decisionmakers at the global, national, and local levels One foundational element is common to all three impact pathways: the contribution of research (under all three themes) to improved knowledge and analysis of development processes.Impact pathway 1 shows how social science information feeds back into CGIAR and non-CGIAR research. This feedback loop will continually bolster the Consortium's capacity to produce ambitious, cutting-edge research that leads to long-term improvements for the poor. Impact pathway 2 reflects the potential for CGIAR-generated research to influence the international development and implementation community, including global and international agencies, donors, and implementers, such as governments and civil society organizations. Impact pathway 3 shows how social science research can influence government policy. The body of research-based evidence and analysis generated by CRP2 will provide concrete evidence of policy options that policymakers can use to craft reform policies aimed at achieving the desired outcomes.High-quality research outputs alone are not enough to achieve impact; they must also be taken up and used. In addition to the three impact pathways described above, the CRP2 strategy to ensure that outputs are translated into outcomes includes the following components: partnerships, to link research to on-the-ground implementation and widen CRP2's influence;  capacity strengthening, to enhance the capacity of partners who will translate research results into on-the-ground impacts;  communication, to produce different outputs that will ensure research dissemination and influence; and  specific outreach strategies to be developed by each subtheme. All these components aim to build bridges to users, going beyond the basic question of \"what is produced?\" to address the broader issue of \"who is being reached?\". This process starts at the inception of the research, when intended users of the research can help identify the relevant questions and priorities. Some of these users will become partners in the research itself, such as when policymakers or NGOs participate in action research or when CRP research evaluates the impact of particular programs. Application of best practice methods and publication in peerreviewed outlets will help ensure the legitimacy of the findings. Also needed, however, are broader forms of outreach, including policy briefs, web-based dissemination, media outreach, and presentations at in-country and international forums. IFPRI's Country Strategy Support Programs (CSSPs), by helping researchers stay close to the issues and facilitating the delivery of results in the developing world, are a promising vehicle for enhancing the impact of CRP2 at the country and local level.CRP2 will include a monitoring framework to report on program activities, track progress, and take corrective actions when needed. Monitoring will be based on indicators and metrics for all outputs and outcomes. Evaluations will assess the achievement of outcomes and the translation of outcomes into impact. The main outputs, outcomes, and impacts of CRP2 research are described in the performance indicators matrix in Annex 1.Research in the three overall themes will be managed at the subtheme level. Within the broad focus of each subtheme (described in the following sections), the specific development challenges, problems, opportunities, and required strategies vary depending on the characteristics of the different countries and regions. Because developing countries face a great variety of challenges and opportunities, approaches to improving policies, institutions, and markets must be country and context specific.To reflect this heterogeneity, the activities in each research theme and subtheme are specified in more detail based on a country typology. Drawing on the World Development Report 2008(WDR 2008), we have identified three types of countries or major subnational regions-agriculture-based, transforming, and urbanized-based on the main characteristics of countries' agricultural development. Following from this typology, we have determined the key development challenges, approaches, and strategies for each type of country. Based on this assessment, we have specified the key CRP2 research areas at a more detailed level and categorized them by subtheme for each type of country or region. The detailed research areas are shown in Table 3.1.Policies provide the enabling environment in which development actions occur and investment choices play out. This first theme of CRP2 analyzes which policies and investments might be better formulated to improve food security and accelerate agricultural income growth and, of equal relevance, how. It also evaluates key growth, equity, and sustainability tradeoffs associated with alternative development strategies and scenarios that provide the broader context in which policies and investments are formulated.Theme 1 consists of 4 subthemes aimed at addressing the key policy gaps identified above. Subtheme 1.1 (Foresight and Strategic Scenarios) focuses on designing scenarios reflecting emerging challenges, modeling the consequences of these scenarios, and using the outputs of the modeling to inform policy research, thereby improving existing agricultural policy and investment decisions. The Foresight program will work closely with the GCARD process. The three other subthemes center on policy analysis, with a global objective of enabling smallholders, the rural poor, and other vulnerable groups to participate in income-generating and asset-building growth. Research under Subtheme 1.2 (Macroeconomic, Trade, and Investment Policies) is designed to correct underinvestment and policy and market distortions in the agricultural sector relative to other sectors. Subtheme 1.3 (Production and Technology Policies) will strive to facilitate participation of smallholders, female farmers, rural laborers, and vulnerable groups in agricultural productivity growth and sustainable resource use. Subtheme 1.4 (Social Protection Policies) plans to increase poor people's access to safety nets, food assistance, and cash transfers to reduce their vulnerability to risks.For new policy ideas to be translated into changes on the ground, two conditions need to be met: (1) policy ideas must be formulated into policies; and (2) policies must be adequately implemented.Subtheme 2.1 (Policy Processes) will study research-policy linkages and policy implementation processes in order to increase the likelihood that science-and evidence-based policy options will be adopted into progressive reforms.One major obstacle to policy implementation arises from the failure of governments and markets to provide rural services and infrastructure. Subtheme 2.2 (Governance of Rural Services) will address this issue by identifying governance arrangements suitable for providing critical rural services and for supporting effective and equitable farmer organizations, resource user groups, and producer groups.Tenure security and capacity for collective action are prerequisites for reducing poverty and enabling more effective management of common pool resources and environmental services. Moreover, agricultural policy processes often suffer from the lack of voice of smallholder farmers and women, who make up so much of the agricultural labor force in developing countries. How can sound arrangements for property rights and collective action be achieved, and how can small-scale producers be empowered to increase their voice in policy decisions and to gain access to investment and market opportunities? These are the questions that Subtheme 2.3 (Collective Action and Property Rights) will strive to address.Translating increased productivity and incomes into sustainable rural development requires ensuring that poor people are able to accumulate the tangible and intangible assets that will allow them to generate sustainable livelihoods. Such changes often go beyond single policies and require appropriate institutional structures. To address this challenge, Subtheme 2.4 (Institutions to Strengthen the Assets of the Poor) will focus on creating enabling institutions for the poor.Establishing competitive and efficient markets is a central challenge of achieving economic growth. Millions of low-income people participate in agricultural value chains as producers, small-scale traders, processors, retailers, and consumers. Improving the performance of value chains therefore stands to benefit large numbers of people. This theme identifies key constraints and opportunities in value chains; evaluates options for upgrading value chains; and provides tools, strategies, and policy approaches for achieving development change that is pro-poor, sustainable, and gender sensitive. Subtheme 3.1 (Innovations across the Value Chain) will look into how to make commodity markets function better for the poor through value-chain innovations in five key areas: reducing transaction costs, managing risk, building social capital, enabling collective action, and redressing missing markets. Subtheme 3.2 (Impact of Upgrading Value Chains) will develop a comprehensive strategy for assessing the impact of interventions designed to upgrade value chains across different CRPs. It will identify appropriate indicators and methods for monitoring the performance of projects, evaluating their effectiveness, and assessing their impact on the poor and other target groups, including women.For the CGIAR to deliver on its mission-achieving sustainable and positive change for those who need it most-its approaches to agricultural research and development must engage, empower, and invest in women, not only to correct gender inequities, but also to achieve more effective development. CRP2 will ensure that gender issues are not only integrated into each of the research themes, but also that critical gender issues become a focus of R&D in their own right. In CRP2, experiences with gender analysis under individual projects will be collected, compared, and contrasted to uncover broader lessons on gender integration in its research.Poverty and hunger remain enormous problems. Nearly 1 billion people in the world go hungry, and more than 1 billion live on just $1.25 a day; Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia account for the largest shares of these people. Despite global efforts to overcome these problems, one of the most promising tools for promoting development and reducing poverty-pro-poor, sustainable agricultural growth-has been underexploited. Seventy-five percent of the poor in developing countries live in rural areas, and the majority of them depend on agriculture for their livelihoods. Evidence shows that agricultural growth reduces poverty by twice the rate of growth in nonagricultural sectors (World Bank 2007;Diao et al. 2007). Improving agricultural productivity is also critical to achieving most of the targets specified under the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) (Rosegrant et al. 2006). Agriculture is central in the lives of poor people, and any strategy for cutting poverty and hunger must center on rapid agricultural growth.Growth in agriculture, however, has been slowing. During the past two decades, a slowdown in investments in agricultural research and development (R&D) and rural infrastructure has contributed to a decline in crop yield growth in much of the world. Equally important, lack of enabling policy environments, poor governance, weak institutions, and inadequate markets for small producers have held back agricultural growth (World Bank 2007). These developments have gradually tightened global food markets over the past decade. Now, with lower food stocks and reduced excess capacity, the global food system is exposed to greater price volatility and trade instability when exogenous supply shocks occur, as seen in the food price spike of 2007 and 2008 and in the current run-up in prices as of early 2011. The food price spikes (as well as sharply rising energy prices and the financial crisis) have affected all countries in differing ways, but developing countries, and especially poor and vulnerable producers and consumers, have generally fared the worst. Poor people in Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, and Latin America still spend 50-70 percent of their income on food, so price spikes and fluctuations hit them hard. Higher food prices could in principle give farmers an opportunity to raise their incomes, but they often lack the inputs, technologies, markets, and financial and credit services they need to exploit this opportunity. And, in any case, most farmers in developing countries are currently net purchasers of food.Prospects for future food security remain serious. After declining slowly for decades through the mid-2000s, food prices appear likely to keep on climbing. Maize, rice, and wheat prices are projected to rise by 21-61 percent, and beef, pork, and poultry prices by 17-40 percent by 2050 according to IAASTD's reference projections (Rosegrant et al. 2009a). Under conditions of more severe climate change, price increases could be even larger (Nelson et al. 2010). Rising prices will dampen food demand of poor consumers and lead to relatively slow growth in calorie consumption. If current policies and investments continue-that is, under business as usual-the number of malnourished children in the group of developing-countries will decline only slowly, from about 146 million in 2000 to 99 million by 2050, with one-third of malnourished children in Sub-Saharan Africa (Rosegrant et al. 2009a). This poor progress on food security does not come close to meeting the targets set out in the MDGs (Rosegrant et al. 2006).Yet a combination of improvements in agricultural policies, accelerated investments, and market reforms can change this situation markedly. Scenarios of alternative futures suggest that concerted action could lead to real improvement in food security. These scenarios estimate that policy reforms and high agricultural investments-including more and more efficient agricultural research, expanded irrigation, enhanced natural resource management with more efficient water use, investments in rural roads, and improved marketing and communications-could reduce the number of malnourished children in 2050 by 30-40 percent, compared with business-as-usual, depending on assumptions about climate change (Rosegrant et al. 2009a(Rosegrant et al. , 2009b)).In the coming decades, challenges to agricultural growth and food security will be driven by factors on both the demand side and the supply side (see Box 1.1). On the demand side, rapid economic growth and urbanization in much of the developing world is expected to raise demand for meat, maize, and soybeans for livestock feed, and higher-value commodities such as fruits and vegetables. Improved economic growth in Africa will likely strengthen demand for staples, such as rice and wheat. At the same time, growth in cereal and meat consumption will be much slower in developed countries. These trends will lead to an extraordinary increase in the importance of developing countries in global food markets.On the supply side, resource constraints will be a key challenge. Water scarcity due to competition from other sectors, changes in the volume and pattern of rainfall, and declining water tables and quality will play a particularly important role. Farmers who rely on irrigation and who live in waterscarce areas-where gross domestic product (GDP) is rising and population is expanding rapidly-will be most affected. By 2050, key water-scarce agricultural regions in China, India, Central and West Asia, and North Africa will likely need to produce more food with virtually no increase in water for agriculture because of little increase in supply and significant transfers of water from agriculture to other uses and sectors. Land and water resources will also come under pressure, as food production increasingly competes with urban and industrial expansion, biofuel crop production, and demand for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions mitigation and carbon sequestration practices. Although some GHG-reducing strategies such as minimum tillage will create win-win synergies with continued crop yield growth, other strategies, including reduced fertilizer use and shifts to carbon farming, may have trade-offs with food production. Emerging energy scarcity also poses new challenges and opportunities for sustainable and equitable agricultural productivity growth. In the longer run, demands for ecosystem conservation and biodiversity will also compete with food for agricultural land and water resources. Because of the decline in the availability of water and land that can be profitably brought under cultivation, expanding cultivated area will make only a limited contribution to future food production growth (Evans 2009), except in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. The burden of meeting future cereal demand and achieving Income and population growth  Urbanization  Biofuels and links to energy markets  Climate policy related to emissions, mitigation, and carbon sequestration Supply Side  Science and technology policy  Investment in agricultural research and complementary public services  Macroeconomic, trade, and sectoral policies, farming systems management, and governance reform  Value chains and markets  Climate variability and change  Water and land scarcity and quality, rising energy prices  Nonmarket ecosystem services, such as biodiversity levels and its feedbacks sustainable agricultural productivity growth thus rests on crop yield growth, which will need to provide 90 percent or more of future growth (Rosegrant et al. 2009a).Two separate but related strategies are required to achieve sustainable crop yield growth that reduces poverty and improves food security. The first is the development of new agricultural technologies. As noted in the CGIAR's Strategy and Results Framework (SRF), \"If poverty and hunger are to be eradicated, substantial investments must be made in agricultural research and innovation as well as in agricultural development\" (CGIAR 2011). Because demand for new technologies will always exceed available resources, it will be important to carefully assess and prioritize appropriate agricultural and rural investments.But investments in agricultural R&D alone are not enough. Improved technologies will not lead to the necessary yield growth without appropriate policies, extension, and other services to disseminate the technologies; property rights and collective action institutions to enable smallholders to adopt technologies; and well-functioning markets to provide farmers with inputs and incentives for increased production. Thus, the second strategy centers on carefully crafted policies, institutions, and markets that ensure that these technologies are adopted and benefit the poor. Indeed, sound policies, institutions, and markets go beyond technologies to contribute to the food security and incomes of the rural poor in a whole range of ways. This is the focus of CRP2, \"Policies, Institutions, and Markets to Strengthen Food Security and Incomes for the Rural Poor.\"Current policies, institutions, and markets suffer from some important gaps and failures, including the following: Neglect of emerging challenges: Development policies often fail to anticipate and address the emerging challenges of rising energy prices, climate change, natural resource scarcity, and agrobiodiversity loss. Neglect of smallholders: Policies that support agricultural productivity and marketing tend to favor large-scale farmers while failing to address the needs of smallholders, women farmers, and other vulnerable groups, and they often do not provide adequate risk protection for the rural poor. Few policies are in place to support producers' organizations, resource users groups, producers groups, and other actors who are essential for building effective smallholder-oriented value chains. Narrow focus on agriculture: Agricultural policies tend to overlook important macroeconomic conditions and environmental implications of policy implementation, with large costs to agricultural and economic development. Underinvestment and market distortion: Market and governance failures result in underinvestment and policy and market distortions in the agricultural sector, especially with regard to R&D and the pricing of inputs and natural resources. Weak institutions and infrastructure: Current policies are often ineffectively implemented because of weak institutions and are not sufficiently supported by infrastructure and agricultural service provision owing to market and government failures.Solving these problems will be critical to fostering the positive change in policies, governance arrangements, and market systems that will allow agriculture to fully contribute to poverty reduction and development.It is precisely here that CRP2 can make a critical contribution. CRP2 research will clarify how to overcome these gaps and failures so that policies, institutions, and markets can be used most effectively to reduce poverty and improve food security, health, nutrition, and sustainability: Policies: Policies should be designed to sustainably increase land, labor, and water productivity and to promote appropriate, gender-differentiated technology adoption (Quisumbing 2003). They should support the marketing of agricultural inputs and outputs, especially for small producers (Rosegrant et al. 2009b).Targeted social protection policies to increase poor people's access to safety nets, food assistance, and cash transfers (Evans 2009) will also be needed, as an alternative to subsidies (which drain government's budgets) or price controls (which reduce farmers' incentives to produce). Governance and institutions: Inclusive and enabling governance and institutions are needed to foster policy implementation, promote technology adoption, and provide services, as well as ensure that benefits are translated into long-term asset building (Birner, Quisumbing, and Ahmed 2010;World Bank and IFPRI 2010). The CGIAR's Social Science Stripe Review notes: \"Just as agricultural technologies and NRM practices are deeply embedded in the farming systems in which they are found, so are those farming systems equally embedded in agroecological processes and economic, political, and social structures that fundamentally shape their evolution and performance (Conway et al. 2006). In many of the settings of greatest interest to the CGIAR-areas with the highest rates of poverty, malnutrition and resource degradation-these broader structures limit the speed and extent of adoption of improved technologies, practices and policies\" (CGIAR Science Council 2009). Markets: Effective markets benefit both producers and consumers and offer greater income opportunities by integrating small-scale producers into upgraded value chains.Within these major challenges, the specific development challenges, problems, opportunities, and required strategies vary depending on the characteristics of countries and regions. In order to adapt the research areas to the country types, we have utilized the typology developed by the World Development Report (2008). As shown in Table 3.1 in Section 3, this typology divides countries or major subnational regions into three broad types based on the main characteristics of agricultural development. These three types are agriculture-based, transforming, and urbanized. Table 3.1 therefore specifies the main CRP2 research areas for each subtheme according to these country types.Improving agricultural productivity and translating agricultural gains into food and nutrition security also requires addressing the gender gap. The 2011 FAO State of Food and Agriculture report highlights that women almost everywhere \"face more severe constraints than men in accessing productive resources, markets, and services\" (FAO 2011). This gender gap in assets constrains agricultural productivity growth. There is strong evidence that men and women do not use income or assets in the same ways and that increasing the resources under the control of women is likely to do more to increase the nutritional status and health of children (Quisumbing 2003). The 2009 Global Hunger Index (IFPRI 2009) shows a significant correlation with the gender inequality index. CRP2 will thus consider ways to address the gender gap in assets; ensure that agricultural technologies, extension, and other services address the needs of women producers and consumers; and make markets accessible to women.Under business as usual, projected growth in agricultural productivity in the next two decades is unlikely to meet effective demand for food. Small agricultural producers face enormous challenges, but they also have great potential to feed the world-if they can get access to the inputs, technologies, markets, and public services they need. The adoption of evidence-based policies, inclusive institutions, and equitable markets-based on sound and innovative research focused on the complex agricultural development process-can help achieve this goal. The purpose of CRP2, \"Policies, Institutions, and Markets to Strengthen Food Security and Incomes for the Rural Poor,\" is to address this challenge by producing a body of knowledge to support appropriate policies, institutions, and markets for pro-poor agricultural growth.The CGIAR and its partners are well placed to provide the necessary research. Many institutions work on issues related to policies, institutions, and markets in developing countries. Therefore, it is important to clarify the comparative advantage that CRP2 organizations have to work on those issues. This comparative advantage is based on several factors.First, the CGIAR institutions have a specific mandate to focus on the intersection of food security, poverty, and sustainable agriculture. Other international organizations have mandates on development, macroeconomic, trade, and microeconomic issues, but their focus-in terms of sectors and topics-is more general. Second, the activities of CRP2 are centered on research and knowledge-based capacity building in the public, private, civil society, and academic sectors. Other organizations that may use loans and financing of technical assistance do not focus on research and knowledge generation, and sometimes interact only with certain actors within the public, private, civil society, and academic realms. Third, the CGIAR organizations have the advantages of institutional and political independence. This feature allows the CGIAR Consortium to be seen as an \"honest broker\" that can tackle different problems without a priori institutional points of view and without being constrained by political decisionmaking processes. Fourth, the CGIAR organizations operate at a large enough scale to generate an intellectual critical mass but are not so large that they are hampered by cumbersome organizational arrangements. Therefore, these organizations can be relatively flexible and agile in responding to new intellectual and policy challenges in ways that larger organizations with more constraining political structures of decisionmaking may not be able to replicate. Fifth, the CGIAR organizations are widely recognized as centers of high-quality research and development that apply novel approaches and instruments and possess large networks of data collection in developing countries. Whereas other institutions may show some of the above traits, the combination of all of them is unique to the CGIAR institutions.Further analysis of the CGIAR's comparative advantage with respect to alternative suppliers for each research area is provided in Section 4 and in Annex 5. Please note that most alternative suppliers are also, by design, partners in CRP2. Rather than \"alternative suppliers,\" we prefer to think of most of these as joint suppliers of joint products.The CGIAR seeks to achieve four system-level outcomes (SLOs): (1) reduced rural poverty; (2) increased food security; (3) improved nutrition and health; and (4) more sustainable management of natural resources. This section describes how CRP2 will contribute to these outcomes while addressing the major challenges described in Section 1.As previously noted, there are many constraints to meeting the SLOs. The CGIAR's Strategy and Results Framework notes: \"Multiple and interacting constraints imply the need for multiple interventions, with the objective that a subset of critical interventions release further investment by poor households as a pathway out of poverty. Such complementary interventions to productivity-enhancing technologies include organizational innovations for access to input and output markets, insurance, microcredit, enhanced property rights, especially for women, and safety nets\" (CGIAR 2011). CRP2 is designed to facilitate these complementary interventions by providing knowledge and tools to support a policy, institutional, and market environment in which agriculture and directly related sectors fully contribute to rural poverty reduction, food security, nutrition, and sustainable rural development.Besides directly contributing to the SLOs, CRP2 will have synergies with other CRPs and with the work of national agricultural research system(s) (NARS[s]) and other organizations involved in agricultural research for development (AR4D). CRP2 will inform priorities for appropriate investment by the public and private sector, including producers themselves. It will facilitate the creation of environments that ensure that appropriate technologies are developed and adopted. And it will ensure that small-scale producers and poor consumers benefit from increases in agricultural production through better access to markets.Many areas of research have the potential to contribute to delivering on the SLOs. After extensive priority-setting and consultation with key stakeholders, we have grouped the components of CRP2 into three interlinked themes to optimize the delivery of solutions to the problems detailed in Section 1: Effective Policies and Strategic Investments (Theme 1): This theme will improve policy options at the global, regional, and country levels by using models and scenarios; analyzing how best to allocate public resources for research and investment; and strengthening capacity for formulating and implementing policies and investments designed to increase agricultural productivity and enhance rural incomes. Inclusive Governance and Institutions (Theme 2): This theme will examine the scope for institutional and governance reforms and contribute to effective and equitable access to rural services, property rights, collective action, and assets by studying existing systems and testing institutional innovations in these areas. Linking Small Producers to Markets (Theme 3): This theme will increase the competitiveness of markets to benefit producers and consumers and offer greater income opportunities by integrating small-scale producers into upgraded value chains.The third section of Annex 1 (performance indicator matrix) provides the detailed contributions of each of these themes to the SLOs.Policies set the enabling environment for effective agricultural growth; institutions structure the delivery of goods and services and the context for action; and markets organize the relationships among value-chain actors, including smallholder producers. Therefore, each of these research themes provides a critical entry point to addressing the challenges identified in Section 1. Working across the three themes will allow us to address several of the market failures and research gaps laid out in Section 1. Figure 2.1 illustrates the linkages between themes and the overall integration across themes. For example: Theme 1 identifies needed technology policies, investments, and safety nets, thus contributing to Theme 2. Theme 1 identifies macroeconomic conditions, investments, and technology policies to improve inclusive markets for smallholders, thus contributing to Theme 3. Theme 2 analyses how producer groups and control over assets can help smallscale producers participate in value chains, thus contributing to Theme 3 (see Figure 2.1 for more examples).Because of these links among the themes, research is needed in all three areas to contribute to an environment in which pro-poor, sustainable agricultural growth can thrive. Reforming policies or institutions without linking small producers to markets, for example, could risk leaving smallholders behind. Strengthening markets without reforming macroeconomic policies could doom market-building efforts to failure. Research on strategic scenarios will identify emerging challenges and their implications for agricultural policy and investment (P&I). These scenarios will inform research on what policies can best provide an enabling framework for agricultural and rural development in a dynamic and changing world. Research on macroeconomic, trade, and investment policies; agricultural production and technology policies; and social protection policies will make it possible for smallholders, the rural poor, and other vulnerable groups to participate in growth that generates income and builds assets. Effective policies can correct state and market failures-for example, by helping to internalize the cost of environmental externalities and by factoring overall economic and trade policies into the development of agricultural support policies.Theme 2 investigates governance and institutional arrangements that are needed for critical policy reforms and institutional changes to be adopted and implemented. This research will be carried out within four subthemes: Policy Processes (Subtheme 2.1) Research on policy processes will examine policy and implementation processes and policyresearch linkages. Research on governance of rural services will analyze alternative reform options that are helpful to the agricultural sector and to smallholders and address critical implementation issues for delivering rural services. Research on institutions that support collective action and property rights and strengthen the assets of the poor will deal with the interface between policies, on the one hand, and people's responses, on the other. Theme 2 will interact closely with actors and institutions, analyzing their institutional incentives and reform options and helping strengthen their capacity and coordination.Theme 3 identifies constraints and opportunities in value chains, evaluates options for upgrades, and provides tools and strategies for development change that is pro-poor, sustainable, and gender sensitive. Theme 3 has two subthemes: Innovations across the Value Chain (Subtheme 3.1) The Impact of Upgrading Value Chains (Subtheme 3.2)Research on innovations across the value chain will seek to foster opportunities for smallholder farmers by, for example, revealing ways to reduce transaction costs and improving value-chain outcomes for smallholders. To evaluate option for upgrading value chains, Subtheme 3.2 will examine both upgrades that apply to a number of commodities and upgrades that are commodity specific (this work will be done in collaboration with commodity-specific CRPs). This theme will thus contribute to relieving market failures related to investment in value chains for smallholder agriculture.Of course, there are complementarities among the different subthemes. In the example of Theme 2, policy processes will affect governance of rural services and property rights reform; rural services may rely on collective action approaches for provision of water or extension; and collective action and property rights will affect the accumulation of social capital and other tangible assets. These four subthemes will therefore regularly share information and approaches.The outputs of each theme will lead to a range of intermediate outcomes that, collectively, will contribute to the CGIAR's four SLOs, and particularly to rural poverty reduction and increased food security. To be as specific as possible, we are providing this information by subtheme in Table 2.1, while Annex 1 (performance indicators matrix) provides the detailed contributions of the overall themes to the SLOs. Some work will cut across all themes in CRP2. The strategic gender research, as well as attention to key gender issues in each theme of CRP2, will ensure that strategies are identified to overcome gender disparities. Partnerships, policy communications, and capacity-strengthening activities are also crosscutting. These activities are linked to and embedded in the research agenda, in addition to being key elements of achieving impact in the follow-up to the research.Although CRP2 research will be conducted at different levels, from the local to the national, regional, and global levels, all of it will contribute to the production of international public goods (IPGs). Innovative global models will simulate different scenarios on how regions and countries could be affected by critical drivers of change and could develop strategies to respond to these changes and optimize investments. Comparative analysis across research sites and projects will ensure that the research carried out in particular countries and even localities contributes to IPGs, as recommended by the CGIAR Social Science Stripe Review (CGIAR Science Council 2009). As much as possible, we will design research to be comparable across sites. In other cases, we will study particular innovations or \"outliers\" to identify lessons applicable to other regions. As estimated in Rosegrant et al. (2009b) and as noted in the CGIAR's SRF (2011), CRP2 is expected to have several measurable impacts on the poor. Ex ante analysis of the impacts of policy research can be undertaken using simulation and scenarios analysis. Estimates of the impacts of strategic foresight and technology policies and investments that are given in this proposal are derived from the background paper prepared for the CGIAR Strategy and Results Framework (Rosegrant et al. 2009b) and from additional simulations utilizing the IMPACT model. In Rosegrant et al. (2009b), a series of agricultural investment and policy scenarios were designed and implemented using The positive impact of gender equality on poverty reduction has been well documented (Meinzen-Dick et al. 2002;World Bank 2007). A recent study estimates that countries that are off track on meeting MDG 3 on gender parity are likely to lose an average of 0.4 percentage points in annual economic growth between 2005 and 2015 (Abu-Ghaida and Klasen 2004). Therefore, improved governance and policy processes that reduce gender disparities through reductions in the gender asset gap and increases in women's involvement in decisionmaking processes will be a crucial component of further efforts to reduce poverty.Section 1 presents a description of key development challenges related to agriculture and rural development and Section 4 provides a detailed description of the research themes and subthemes. Given the constraints of the proposal format, this material is presented at a relatively general level. To better reflect the heterogeneity in the relative importance of problems and opportunities across regions, Table 3.1 provides a typology of countries or major subnational regions in terms of characteristics, development challenges, approach/strategy, and CRP2 research areas.The three types of countries or major subnational regions listed in this table (agriculture-based, transforming, and urbanized) are based on the main characteristics of countries' agricultural development and are drawn from the World Development Report (WDR 2008). Following from this typology and based on our own analysis and other literature referenced in the table, we have identified the key development challenges (column 2 of the table) and development approaches and strategies (column 3) for each type. This analysis has led us to determine CRP2 research areas-at a more detailed level and categorized by subtheme-for each country/region type (column 4).It should be noted that some research areas cut across the different types of countries or subnational regions. For example, Subtheme 1.1 on Foresight and Strategic Scenarios is a global activity, designed to capture how global drivers and scenarios influence countries throughout the world while capturing the interconnections of agricultural markets and the global externalities of climate change. Although global in nature, the analysis allows for assessment of highly disaggregated and spatially explicit subnational productivity and natural resource impacts of drivers of global change. As can be seen in Table 3.1, other research areas also cut across two or more country/region types.At this early stage, the typology outlined in Table 3.1 does not fully capture the complexity of some large countries in which significant differences are found across regions. For example, in the rapidly transforming countries of Brazil, China, and India, some regions have lagged behind in agricultural development, such as western China, northeast Brazil, and eastern India. Relatively higher levels of poverty and food insecurity persist in these regions (Pingali 2010). The research areas for these regions are similar to those for the agriculture-based countries.Research priorities across types of countries and regions will be further developed during the participatory priority-setting process that will be established during the project implementation phase (see below). (regional, global) and trade reform in terms of economic (macro and micro) effects -Identifying multiple pathways for the rural poor to move out of poverty traps and policy options needed to promote sustainable rural employment -Improving macro, trade, and agricultural sectoral policies in both agriculture and nonagriculture for broad-based rural growth -Prioritizing and sequencing public investment and improving its efficiency -Crafting policies to mitigate excessive volatility and its impacts through the role of trade and trade policies in managing price fluctuations in agricultural markets Subtheme 1.3 -Crafting policies that facilitate access to improved crop cultivars and animal breeds -Improving legal, regulatory, and policy frameworks on improved cultivars and breeds, including seed systems, NUSs, and international collaboration -Improving policy research capacity and cross-country knowledge sharing -Crafting policies that sustainably increase productivity along the land-water-energyfood nexus -Evaluating policies on improving access to resource-efficient and multifunctional technologies, focusing on appropriate technologies -Crafting policies that enable adoption of more sustainable agricultural practices -Strengthening analytical capacity on systems-based and impact analysis -Evaluating impacts of alternative extension approaches on women and men -Reform export taxation of agriculture and remove barriers to regional trade -Evaluating the joint impacts of social protection and smallholder interventions -Making innovative institutional arrangements for the provision of weather and health insurance Subtheme 2.1 -Building capacity for policy analysis to support evidence-based policy-making -Political economy of institutional reforms to empower smallholders and women, especially devolution policies -Including women and poor in community and local government political processes -Determining factors that facilitate or limit the uptake of policy research findings Subtheme 2.2 -Innovating institutional arrangements to provide rural services and infrastructure, especially in situations where government capacity is low -Crafting governance reform strategies to address governance challenges of public and other organizations in the agricultural sector -Focusing on most binding constraints in rural services (which may differ across agriculture-based economies) Subtheme 2.3 -Crafting land tenure reforms and other strategies to strengthen property rights of smallholders, pastoralists, fishers, indigenous peoples, women, and the poor -Crafting strategies for improving collective action and tenure security for effective management of common-pool resources and environmental services -Ensuring that benefits of land-based investments are shared with local residents and land users -Identifying effective collective action strategies for small-scale producers and rural poor to gain access to market opportunities Subtheme 2.4 -Understanding the roles of assets of women and men in pathways from poverty -Identifying improved institutional arrangements for asset accumulation by poor women and men -Utilizing risk management in protecting assets -Evaluating agricultural and other programs and policies to strengthen assets of the poor Subtheme 3.1 -Identifying opportunities for smallholders to benefit from rising demand for highvalue commodities and gain access to the available retail structures, including modern retail chains -Upgrading value chains by removing constraints to participation and enhancing benefits from participation -Improving institutional designs for collective action among smallholders and through contract farming Subtheme 3.2 -Crafting policies for creating an environment for willing buyers and enabling sustainable linkages between capable farmers and willing buyers -Utilizing best practices to upgrade value chains and increasing the adoption of best practices through the knowledge clearinghouse -Improving sectoral policies for broad-based rural growth -Identifying more effective international trade policies (regional and global) and institutional setting needed to support inclusion of poor countries in trade negotiations -Examining the impacts and interactions of national macroeconomic policies with agricultural, climate change, and biofuel policies -Assessing the macro and micro effects of FDI, including foreign investment in land, on the agricultural sector, particularly on the smallholder agriculture and rural households -Identifying excessive price volatility in global food markets and the most vulnerable groups that will be negatively affected by price volatility, and promoting policies to mitigate such shocks and impacts Subtheme 1.3 -Crafting policies that facilitate access to improved crop cultivars and animal breeds -Improving legal, regulatory, and policy frameworks on improved cultivars and breeds, with a focus on market-led growth -Crafting policies that sustainably increase productivity along the land-water-energyfood nexus -Evaluating polices on improving access to resource-efficient and multifunctional technologies, focusing on advanced farm management systems -Assessing potential impacts of advanced science applications on food security -Evaluating impacts of alternative extension approaches on women and men -Crafting policies that diversify rural incomes sustainably -Analyzing the role of public and private sectors in rural income diversification -Evaluating the impact of sustainability standards on efficiency and equity organizations, commodity-specific organizations) in agricultural policy processes -Identifying factors that facilitate or limit the uptake of policy research findings Subtheme 2.2 -Making reforms of rural services to allow for increasing private sector participation -Strengthening governance of public sector services that are required for high-value and export crops (e.g., food safety regulation) -Improving the investment climate for private sector service providers Subtheme 2.3 -Identifying ways to strengthen property rights of women and small-scale producers so that they benefit from rising land values -Crafting strategies for improving collective action and tenure security for effective provision of environmental services -Identifying effective collective action strategies for rural poor to gain access to market opportunities Subtheme 2.4 -Mapping asset portfolios of women and men and role in empowerment, poverty reduction -Crafting policy reforms and institutional arrangements to allow asset accumulation for women and men -Utilizing risk management and insurance in protecting assets Subtheme 3.1 -Identifying strategies to target vulnerable groups to increase their access to inputs and dynamic markets (small-scale, vulnerable, or female-headed farm households) -Promoting rural innovation and provision of information to communities on inputs, technologies, and resource management systems through the public, private, and civil society sectors -Prioritizing post-harvest and hard infrastructure needed to improve competitiveness of producers and to address standards required by dynamic markets -Improving institutional design on horizontal coordination (rural producer associations) and vertical coordination (contract farming) Subtheme 3.2 -Improving small farmers' access to financial markets and insurance mechanisms -Identifying policies for creating environments for willing buyers and enabling sustainable linkages between capable farmers and willing buyers -Increasing the adoption of best practices through the knowledge clearinghouse and collaborative partnerships c) Urbanized greater specialization or diversification -Making policies and investments required to promote equitable economic development -Investigating the endogenous policy and political processes and identifying policies that can be implemented to benefit the poor -Identifying and mitigating the effects on the poor of excessive price volatility in global food markets -Investigating the mechanism through which international migration and remittances affect poor household income, rural development and agriculture Subtheme 1.3 -Crafting policies to sustainably increase agricultural productivity along the land-waterenergy-food nexus -Assessing technology and policy solutions to reducing adverse impacts of sustainable renewable energy on food security -Assessing potential impacts of advanced science applications on food security -Crafting policies that diversify rural incomes sustainably -Evaluating impacts of sustainability standards on efficiency and equity -Determining policy processes involved in establishing social protection policies in rural areas Subtheme 2.2 -Crafting governance reforms that promote transformation of agricultural and rural service providers (e.g., reduction of the state involvement to essential functions in support of devolving functions to farmers' organizations and the private sector) -Promoting of social protection services and services that facilitate exit from agriculture Subtheme 2.3 -Improving collective action and empowerment of women, small-scale producers Subtheme 2.4 -Identify how migration, rural-urban linkages, and structural transformation affect poor women's and men's abilities to acquire and protect different forms of assets -Strengthening the assets of the poor, especially human capital -Utilizing risk management and insurance in protecting assets Subtheme 3.1 -Making innovations in contract farming and linking farmer associations to dynamic export markets -Prioritizing post-harvest and hard infrastructure needed to improve competitiveness of producers and as to address standards required by dynamic markets -Crafting policy incentives to facilitate the participation of the private sector in delivery systems of inputs -Improving small farmers' access to financial markets and insurance mechanisms Subtheme 3.2 -Crafting policies for creating an environments for willing buyers and the enabling sustainable linkages between capable farmers and willing buyers, and for upgrading value chains to promote south-south cooperation and learning -Increasing the adoption of best practices through the knowledge clearinghouse and collaborative partnershipsTypological criteria for improved selection of IFPRI Short-term priorities will be based on commitments in the existing research pipeline. As anticipated in the CGIAR Strategy and Results Framework (CGIAR 2011), a core of research consists of contracted and funded research already underway across partner CGIAR centers. The need to complete and finalize these existing projects, which represent about two-thirds of CRP2's first-year budget, makes them a priority. Our prioritization of research activities in Section 4 also takes into account uncertainties in initial funding levels. We would accommodate funding restrictions by changing the phasing and scaling of new subthemes and activities, rather than by eliminating a subtheme. We would also scale down the level of ambition across the themes (for example, we would work in fewer countries and decrease the number of cases and study sites), whereas greater investment would allow a finer scale of research.In the longer term, the strategic priorities of each theme and subtheme will increasingly be aligned with the outcomes of a systematic priority-setting process aimed at refining the typology presented in Table 3.1 to point out the most efficient ways of delivering on the SLOs. In terms of regional prioritization, a global priority at the CRP level will be given to Africa and South Asia; more refined regional priorities, by subtheme and activity, will be laid out within the frame of this priority-setting process.Our philosophy is that strategic research projects should be defined not only from the top down, but also from the bottom up. Therefore, the first component of the CRP2 priority-setting process is based on a participatory approach.The research activities described in Section 4 were developed during a preliminary phase of this participatory process, based on an extensive expert e-consultation that involved more than 200 participants (June 28-July 14, 2010); on a face-to-face consultation with more than 50 participants (August 17-19, 2010, in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia); and on continuing interactions with writing teams throughout the proposal development process. These intense discussions have led to the identification of a number of priorities, including the science-technology-practice link; gender; multistakeholder partnerships; regional specificities; enabling institutions; farmer costs; and many other factors, all of which are reflected in the prioritization of proposed new activities.The second phase of the participatory approach will start in November 2011. This more elaborate process will include consultation with the following stakeholders: End users or beneficiaries: These key groups include farmers, farmers' organizations, extension services, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and national, regional, and multilateral organizations.  Researchers: Inputs from those who carry out the research are essential, including partners within the CGIAR, NARs, and universities.  Senior policymakers and decisionmakers: These groups have responsibility for final decisions.  Disciplinary experts: These experts identify relevant research parameters and provide data.  Donors: In addition to funding, donors bring insight and expertise to the table and are important stakeholders in using research findings and scaling up their application.Two main sets of criteria will be used to establish policy research priorities for CRP2: 1. the potential benefits of the research in terms of contributing to the SLOs (for instance, the potential for research results to engender socioeconomic equity; to answer scientific problems related to income enhancement, poverty reduction, and environmental sustainability; and to strengthen institutions, etc.); and 2. the likely costs/barriers related to research development (such as investments required, lag time of adoption, risk that research is not successful, etc.).The participatory priority-setting process will use a multicriteria scoring method: participants will assign a weight coefficient to the different criteria belonging to the two categories described above, and assign a score to each of these criteria for each of the research alternatives. The scores for the different criteria will then be aggregated and rigorously discussed by participant groups in order to obtain an overall assessment of each research alternative. Regional prioritization exercises will be conducted using the same method.At this point, five regional priority-setting workshops are envisaged, one for each of the following regions: (1) South Asia; (2) Southeast Asia, East Asia, and the Pacific; (3) Central and West Asia and North Africa; (4) Sub-Saharan Africa; and (5) Latin America and the Caribbean. These will be followed by a global priority-setting workshop. The aim of the regional workshops will be to assess priorities among themes and subthemes within one region. The aim of the global workshop will be to assess priorities among the different regions and to finalize the priority-setting exercise at the subtheme level. Expert working groups will then be held for each theme, to pursue prioritization at the activity level. Guidelines will be developed for translating priorities into funding allocation. In some cases, priorities may translate into phasing of research components over time. The phasing of the research also includes an opportunistic component and therefore will not be determined entirely in the initial priority-setting process.If possible, the priority-setting sessions will be held in tandem with existing events in order to reduce the costs. The first regional workshop is currently being planned (Alexandria, Egypt, November 28-29, 2011, within the frame of the Conference on Setting Priorities for Food Security and Poverty Reduction in the Arab World). The other regional priority-setting exercises will be planned in due course and will take place in the first months of 2012.The second component of CRP2 priority-setting will consist of modeling approaches. Ex ante and ex post quantitative analysis will provide estimates of economic, poverty, and environmental benefits per dollar of investment in the different research areas, and these estimates will serve as inputs into the priority-setting process. The ex ante assessment tools that will be used for this exercise are reviewed in detail in the description of Subtheme 1.1. To assess progress against goals, ex post impact assessment will be employed when CRP2 research becomes more mature.Once CRP2 is formally established, the combined participatory and modeling approaches will  guide initial collective priority-setting,  guide periodic revision of CRP2's overall strategy and approach, including rolling three-year annual planning processes, and  closely link to the program monitoring and evaluation approaches described later in this section, as a basis for dynamic adaptation to the changing environments of CRP2.Producing high-quality research is not enough; to achieve the strategic objectives of the CGIAR, CPR2 must also ensure that those outputs are used by a range of key stakeholders, whose actions will, in turn, have an impact on improving the lives of millions of poor people. Ensuring impact of policy and institutional research is particularly challenging. Strong and sustained engagement at the country level (e.g., through Country Strategy Support Programs) has been shown to increase uptake of the findings. However, creating international public goods also calls for sharing information internationally, and creating multiplier effects of the research requires strengthening the capacity of a range of partners to undertake similar research, adapted to their particular conditions. Thus, CRP2 has developed a strategy that involves multiple impact pathways.Although each research theme will have specific types of impact (as discussed in detail below), the impact of CRP2 on the SLOs can be broken down into three main impact pathways (see Figure 3.1): Improved knowledge about what works in agricultural development will inform individuals and units involved in policy research (such as the CGIAR, other agricultural research organizations, regional economic bodies, ministries of agriculture, and academic research institutions in both developed and developing countries), enabling them to  acquire a deeper understanding of the complex problems linked with agricultural development processes;  identify constraints and targets for research; and  plan research work and set research priorities.This feedback loop will continuously enrich research and bolster the Consortium's capacity to produce ambitious, cutting-edge research leading to long-term improvements for the poor. It will also enhance the efficiency, effectiveness, and overall impact of agricultural research outside the CGIAR system. For example, strategic foresight models or improved gender analysis will provide guidance for priority-setting in agricultural research to meet the needs of women and men in responding to changing conditions. 1Impact pathway 2 reflects the potential for CGIAR-generated research to influence the international development and implementation community, including donors and implementers, such as governments and civil-society organizations and global and international agencies, among which the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the Global Forum on Agricultural Research (GFAR) and regional agricultural forums, the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), the World Bank, the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Food Programme (WFP), and the World Trade Organization (WTO). This pathway builds on CRP2's direct involvement in the implementation or evaluation of programs led by international, national, nongovernmental, and producer and women's organizations, as well as CRP2's outreach to such organizations with research findings. Donor policies and civil society initiatives are formed using a combination of different elements, including sound research and a sense of \"how development works\"-both of which the CGIAR is equipped to take a lead in providing. Donors, implementers, and producer organizations are thus a highly important audience for CRP2 research.Impact pathway 3 represents the way in which social science research can influence government policy. CGIAR research has already had significant impacts on policies, which in turn have resulted in higher agricultural growth, more food production, and reduced poverty in many countries (see Box 3.1). The body of research-based evidence and analysis generated by CRP2 will provide further concrete evidence of policy options that policymakers can use to craft reform policies aimed at achieving the desired outcomes. The targets of this pathway are not only policymakers, but also the policy analysts and specialists who support decisionmakers. We will go beyond the traditional agricultural sector to work with ministries of finance, trade, women's affairs, environment, and others, as needed.As it pursues impact pathway 3, CRP2 will focus on the CGIAR's fundamental role-conducting and disseminating research and supplying policy information to policymakers. In some cases, working closely with policymakers can help improve our understanding of the policy process and implementation constraints, which can be synthesized to generate international public goods. In general, however, we believe that the CRP should rely on a network of partners to help implement the more action-and policyoriented tasks and translate CGIAR research into on-the-ground action. For example, close ties to the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) process can help disseminate research findings to policymakers in numerous African countries. Advocacy can be considered \"extension for policymakers,\" and many other organizations have extensive expertise in this activity. CRP2 will thus pass advocacy activities on to partners better qualified for it. Identifying partners qualified to implement CRP2 research on the ground will be an essential component of CRP2's initial research design.These three pathways may have different time lags in achieving impact, with impact pathways 1 and 2 taking longer than impact pathway 3. However, for researchers to be able to respond to short-term requests, they must draw on longer-term research results, as the example of responses to the food price crisis has shown (see Box 3.2). Therefore, as described in Section 4, CRP2 resources and programs will focus on achieving both shorter-term goals/quick impact and longer-terms goals along these pathways.CGIAR research has significantly affected policies in a number of countries, including Bangladesh, China, Ethiopia, India, and Vietnam.IFPRI's study of the rice sector in Vietnam provided original insights on aspects such as trade flows, marketing channels and margins, costs of production of paddy, price differentials within and outside the country, and transport costs. This research showed that relaxing rice export quotas and internal trade restrictions on rice would not adversely affect regional disparities and food security and would have benefits for farm prices and poverty. These findings \"changed the level of dialogue in Vietnam\" (Ryan 1999, 19) and led to the relaxation of the country's rice export quotas and internal trade restrictions. The most conservative estimate of IFPRI's contribution to Vietnam is a present value of $45 million, yielding a benefit-cost ratio of 56. For the more optimistic scenario, the present value increases to $91 million and the benefitcost ratio to 114-to-1 when calculated to 2000. The present value of the two policy changes without attribution is estimated at $222 million up to 2000, rising to almost $1 billion if policies remain in place until 2020 (Ryan 1999).IFPRI's evaluation of the Food for Education Program (FFE) in Bangladesh led policymakers to begin the program one year earlier than they might have without the IFPRI input. This program, which reached 2.1 million students in 17,811 schools, created total benefits estimated at $248 million. Capacity building and policy research guided the conception, evaluation, and targeting of the initiative starting in the early 1990s. Based upon the total cost of the IFPRI-FFE research program of US$151,000, the internal rate of return on this research investment ranges from 64 to 96 percent if all the other benefits are added to this (Ryan 2004).Other examples of the impacts of policy research and advocacy by CGIAR centers include research and advocacy aimed at decriminalizing the marketing of milk by small-scale vendors in Kenya. The results of this effort created benefits for producers and consumers worth an estimated $44-$283 million. Another example is research on improved policies on pesticides in the Philippines. This work started in the late 1980s and involved the regulation of highly toxic products used on rice and the training of rural health officers; it has resulted so far in benefits valued at $117 million (Renkow and Byerlee 2011).Partnerships are a critical component of each of the three impact pathways. Impact pathway 1 emphasizes researchers and scientists-in the CGIAR, NARSs, and developed countries-not only as producers of research results, but also as users of research. Collaboration with other CRPs (as indicated in Annex 2) will facilitate the application of CPR2 outputs within the CGIAR, while working with GFAR and regional agricultural forums will facilitate broader outcomes among NARSs and other research institutes. Impact pathway 2 involves various development stakeholders (such as development organizations, producers' and women's organizations, advocacy groups). Working with organizations involved in developing or implementing policies and programs will ensure that the research addresses their needs and that the findings are likely to be taken up. For example, lessons from research to assess the impact of agricultural development projects are likely to be applied by the local implementing agency, other offices of that agency, and the organization that funds that type of program. Impact pathway 3 is intended to reach policymakers and policy analysts. Research in response to government requests has a high likelihood of being taken up through this pathway. Training and other capacity-strengthening activities will enable policy analysts to carry out such research themselves, broaden outcomes to other groups, and enable such analysis to continue beyond CRP2's direct research. IFPRI's Country Strategy Support Programs provide an example of such partnerships. And circulation of highly visible publications in journals, policy briefs, and websites will promote the international public goods nature of this impact, by spreading it beyond the partners we work with directly.Thus, partnerships will  strengthen CRP2's ability to undertake sound applied research in a range of countries;  widen CRP2's range of influence and expand its overall impact; and  allow CRP2 research teams to concentrate on their comparative advantage-that is, the production of policy-oriented research. For the impact pathways to be effective, CRP2 research must be designed in a way that makes it useful to end users. We will integrate extensive feedback into the initial research design from key stakeholders, including representatives of community groups, local government officials, and a range of CGIAR partners, from donors to development organizations. Another crucial condition for maximizing the uptake of research and capacity outputs is packaging the outputs to suit the specific needs of different user groups. To ensure policy relevance, CRP2 will work closely with other CRPs to ensure that the new When global food prices began to rise in 2007, the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) was one of the first institutions to warn of an impending global food price crisis. With an extensive research portfolio and expertise ranging from markets and trade to nutrition and food consumption, IFPRI was well placed and well prepared to answer questions from the public, media, and policymakers with regard to \"What happened?\" and \"Why did it happen?\" The Institute provided evidence-based information through a coordinated communication campaign to inform policy debates through publications, media interviews, face-to-face meetings with policymakers, testimony before legislators, press releases, and the communication of research findings through the internet. During 2007-08, more than 700 media citations, ranging from major international media to influential outlets in the countries most affected helped raise public awareness and engage policymakers.In May 2008, well before many others, IFPRI published an action plan proposing an emergency package of policy actions that could yield immediate impacts as well as medium and longterm activities. These recommendations were used as the basis for discussions at several high-level meetings and summits. Seven out of the eight urgent actions advocated by IFPRI appear in the UN's Comprehensive Framework for Action as policy recommendations and are being implemented through the High-Level Task Force on the global food security crisis.Source: IFPRI 2009a.technologies for accelerating agricultural growth that these CRPs are developing will reach small producers and the rural poor through the formulation of appropriate policies, effective and equitable governance structures, and efficient markets. Monitoring, evaluation, and impact assessment, in turn, will provide feedback to help reshape research agendas and processes.Other more diffuse impact pathways involve flows of research and capacity products through other users, such as the media and the general public. These pathways affect the general discourse on certain key issues and create greater public awareness and demand for appropriate policies, feeding into both impact pathways 2 and 3 (see Figure 3.1). Examples include the media outreach in response to the food price crisis, innovative approaches such as the IFPRI/International Livestock Research Institute TEDx presentations on gender and development, and partnership with Oxfam to provide information for their information campaigns.Measuring progress along these impact pathways is challenging, especially for policy-oriented research. Even a standard linear model, the results chain from inputs, to activities, to outputs, to outcomes (use of the outputs), to impact (effects on poverty reduction, environment, ultimate goals) involves decreasing levels of involvement or control on the part of the researchers and greater uncertainty, resulting in an \"attribution gap\" (Earl, Carden, and Smutylo 2001;Kuby 2003). Until now, few researchers have tackled the complex methodological issues that are inevitably encountered in assessing the concrete benefits of policy research (Ryan and Garrett 2003). There are several other challenges with measuring impact along the pathways identified for CRP2. The complex nature of the relationships means that it is possible neither to identify simple cause and effect nor to predict where impacts will be seen. The objective of generating public goods means that findings from one country or sector may be taken up in a different country or sector.The CGIAR's increasing emphasis on partnerships increases the likelihood of impact, but also makes attribution of impact much more problematic. Unlike crop varietal improvement, research on policies and institutions does not necessarily develop identifiable \"germplasm.\" In a research program in which researchers work with policymakers, ideas are co-produced; if changes in policy or programs are attributed to the \"adoption\" of research ideas, the local ownership of the changes can be reduced. Moreover, given the relatively rapid timeframe for decisionmaking compared with the time required for scientific publications, policies and programs may change based on research findings before those findings are published. The researchers have no control over what their other partners may do; political, institutional, or other considerations may restrict the adoption of particular recommendations. Agricultural policies are particularly challenging to measure because of the diversity of their types and objectives, and any analysis must be disaggregated by major policy type (Norton and Alwang 1998). Even then, the direct relationship between policy research and policy is difficult to capture due to \"human\" factors such as politics. Even more difficult is predicting the adoption of policy recommendations. The effects of policy are complex, blurring the clear link between results, action, and outcomes (Ryan and Garrett 2003). Research under CRP2 (Subtheme 2.1) will address methodologies for assessing the impact of policy research.Thus, while the outcomes of research, such as publications or training materials, are quantifiable and relatively easy to verify, tracing impacts is much more difficult and requires a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, with more reliance on ex post analysis that traces the pathways through which research influenced policies or other changes, which in turn had an impact on the lives of the ultimate beneficiaries (Kuby 2003;CGIAR Science Council 2008).Therefore, CRP2 will use a mix of methods for monitoring, evaluating, and assessing impact. In the following sections, we will first discuss monitoring, which focuses on outputs, then go on to discuss what will be done to transform outputs to outcomes, and finally to methods for impact assessment.With support from the Program Management Unit, the CRP2 director and the Management Committee will have the primary responsibility for designing the M&E framework and for monitoring progress. This M&E framework will also serve as a crucial tool for the independent Science and Policy Advisory Panel. More generally, the M&E framework will be used by all CRP stakeholders to  report on program activities and outputs;  track progress; and  take corrective actions when needed. We will develop a monitoring plan under each subtheme, encompassing all of that subtheme's activities. The monitoring will be based on indicators and metrics for all outputs and outcomes. Progress in delivery of the outputs of each research theme and subtheme will be reviewed and reported annually. All researchers will use a standardized, web-based, real-time tracking system, so that all outputs can be captured and accounted for on a continuing basis, using information such as that presented in Table 3.2. In addition to these generic outputs, specific outputs have been identified at the subtheme level: see performance indicators matrix in Annex 1. Within each subtheme and in consultation with the leaders of each research theme, we will identify key performance indicators and metrics to be used to review the quality and quantity of outputs and outcomes. For example, all journal articles will be quantified, but the number of journal articles published in high-impact journals and influential open-access outlets-as identified by research theme leaders for reaching target audiences-will be prioritized over articles published in less influential outlets. Conferences, trainings, and other research outcomes will be similarly weighted.High-quality research outputs alone are not enough to achieve impact; they must also be taken up and used. While the use may be beyond the control of the researchers, much can be done to increase the likelihood that outputs are translated into outcomes by building bridges to users. At the most basic level, this may mean ensuring that findings are published in a form and an outlet that is accessible to the intended users. For example, if the intended users are other researchers, publications in a prestigious scientific journal may be effective, but if the intended users are government policymakers, policy briefs translated into appropriate languages are more important. Even the availability of the research findings is insufficient: the intended user needs to know about the research and trust the findings. Cash et al. (2002) identify three key factors linking research findings to decisionmaking: (1) salience (findings are relevant to the problems at hand); (2) credibility (findings are authoritative and believable); and (3) legitimacy (findings are perceived as fair). They also highlight the importance of boundary-spanning organizations that link research to users of the information.Taking these factors into consideration increases the likelihood of research outcomes. CRP2 researchers will therefore consider publication outlets in terms of reaching their intended audience. In addition to ensuring the credibility of findings by applying best-practice methods and peer reviews, researchers will increase salience by working with prospective research clients (for example, governments and NGOs) to identify the most relevant questions and increase legitimacy by working with appropriate partners. Professional societies, policy networks, or project advisory committees can provide boundaryspanning functions. In addition, presentations about the project and research results in a variety of forums increase awareness of the findings and the likelihood that results will be applied. Each subtheme will develop its own outreach strategy to increase the uptake of research results, going beyond the basics of \"what did you produce?\" to \"who did you reach?\" Process indicators can be used to document whether these strategies are being effectively followed to increase the likelihood of project outcomes. Beyond this, CRP2 can use stakeholder feedback and knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) surveys to provide indicators of outcomes and influence.Another important set of indicators is the extent to which each of the user groups (such as donors, policymakers, other researchers, and women's or producers' organizations) is being served by, is using, and is satisfied with the program's research deliverables. This satisfaction will be assessed through the collection of distribution and product usage statistics and citations in peer-reviewed publications; the media; and government, NGO, and donor reports. Examples of quantitative indicators include downloads and citations of publications, downloads and uses of databases and films (including uses in student theses or training courses), and follow-up evaluations of training courses or materials. Many government and donor reports may not include direct citations, but content analysis can identify where key findings or concepts have been used in policies. Stakeholder feedback on the quality of outputs using annual web-based surveys will generate indicators of satisfaction and provide information on the end users of each type of product.KAP surveys go a step further in documenting the influence of research on various stakeholders. For example, a newly initiated study of the impact of agricultural programs on the gender gap in assets is administering a KAP survey to donors and implementing organizations at the project's outset and after three years in order to document the extent to which staff members have improved their knowledge of gender relations in agriculture, their attitudes toward the importance of addressing gender issues, and the practices of their organization. This approach could be broadened to include a larger set of stakeholder organizations, as well as other issues related to CRP2. While the methodology for KAP studies is relatively well established, using it to track the impact of CRP2 will present challenges, including turnover of individual staff in surveyed stakeholder organizations. Using this approach requires identifying the appropriate stakeholders and a minimum set of KAP questions for each.IFPRI's Country Strategy Support Programs (CSSPs) (see Box 3.3,Box 3.4,and Box 3.5) are a promising vehicle for enhancing the impact of CRP2 at the country level, staying close to the issues, and facilitating the research and delivery of results in the developing world. CSSPs will also be key in understanding agricultural and rural development processes, collecting longitudinal data, testing and experimenting policy options, and building capacity for impact within countries. CSSPs can serve as a platform to integrate different research themes together to present policy options and strategies in a holistic approach.A Country Strategy Support Program (CSSP) is a country-based intensive and sustained program of research, policy communication, and capacity strengthening undertaken by IFPRI and its partners in an individual country. CSSPs work directly with national research institutions, decisionmakers within the government, and other stakeholders to (1) increase the availability of research in that country on a broad range of issues related to food policy and development strategies, (2) enhance national capacity to undertake such policy research, (3) provide a platform through which CGIAR research staff can remain better informed about the national policy process of food policy and development strategies, and (4) promote dissemination and outreach of research results and facilitate public dialogue on key issues at various levels of government, civil society, and the private sector.The quality of the research is crucial for policy uptake. High-quality research addressing highpriority issues and effectively communicated to policymakers can play a catalytic role in the policy process. Researchers can use the credibility of their research to influence policy, and CSSPs allow researchers to play such a role. For example, CSSPs in Africa have been actively involved in supporting the CAADP process by conducting high-quality research, organizing and participating in strategy development consultations and other events, and participating in direct dialogue with policymakers. CSSP research programs are designed to meet demand from policymakers and other stakeholders in a timely way to contribute to policy debates in host countries. Examples of such research include analysis of fertilizer marketing and pricing (Nigeria, Ghana, and Malawi), agricultural growth options and prioritization of public investment (Ghana, Ethiopia, and Uganda), and options for enhancing rural and urban linkages (Ethiopia, Ghana, Malawi, Mozambique, Nigeria, and Uganda). Research results, such as from the Ghana fertilizer subsidy analysis, has provided useful input into policy dialogue and contributed to the improvement of the relevant policy. CSSP research also provides international public goods in the form of broad lessons on agricultural and rural issues for other developing countries.The CSSP approach to strengthening the analytical capacity of selected national institutions uses collaborative research, based on state-of-the-art analytical tools and techniques. Almost all CSSP research projects are designed and undertaken by IFPRI researchers jointly with their in-country partners. For example, the Ethiopia Strategy Support Program (ESSP) has developed sustainable partnerships with the Ethiopian Development Research Institute (EDRI), the Central Statistics Agency (CSA), and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MoARD) and has conducted various research and survey projects jointly with these partners. CSSPs also provide training programs to their partner institutions. More than 200 women and 500 men in Africa have been taking short courses organized by CSSPs about the application of different policy analytic tools. The technical assistance ESSP provided to Ethiopian CSA analysts in GIS techniques, database management, and data analysis helped CSA produce the Population and Housing Census Atlas of Ethiopia 2007, published in 2010.The institutional platform developed by CSSPs creates an environment where research teams within the CGIAR can jointly undertake country-specific work on strategies to alleviate hunger and poverty. In so doing, the CSSPs facilitate the generation of international public goods and contribute to achieving better impact on policy and national capacity in the countries. CSSPs are also useful for regional networking and can play an important role in bringing a variety of stakeholders-including the numerous bodies of the CGIAR-together to inform the policy process.The Ghana Strategy Support Program (GSSP) is a research, communication, and capacity-strengthening program that builds the capabilities of researchers, administrators, policymakers, and members of civil society in Ghana to develop and implement agricultural and rural development strategies. With core funding from the USAID and a mandate to develop a multi-donor-funded program, IFPRI launched GSSP as a partnership between Ghana and its development partners.Unlocking the potential of Ghanaian agriculture and achieving the country's growth and poverty reduction goals requires strong and strategic partnerships committed to the achievement of the following GSSP objectives:  To develop and implement a research and capacity-building agenda that addresses knowledge and capacity gaps;  To improve the information and knowledge base required to develop and implement strategies through better data standards, integration of information across sectors, and improved management of knowledge;  To strengthen the analytical capacity of Ghanaian researchers and institutions by adopting innovative collaborative arrangements that take advantage of complementarities;  To stimulate and invigorate policy discussions by popularizing innovative policy analysis tools; and  To strengthen policymaking processes, stimulate policy dialogue, and communicate research outcomes to relevant stakeholders.To meet these objectives, GSSP collaborates closely with policymakers, researchers, and other partners at the national and subnational levels who identify program priorities and guide their implementation. GSSP builds on existing work and capacities in Ghana by forming broad partnerships and networks with institutions and individuals in research, the private sector, civil society, and government. Examples include the Office of the President, the Department of Agricultural Economics at the University of Ghana in Legon, the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), and the Private Enterprise Foundation (PEF).Government and donor stakeholders have emphasized the unique and unprecedented value-added dimension that GSSP has brought to Ghana. The program has been able to create a niche in research and has been recognized as providing knowledge-based services that donors, the Government of Ghana, and other stakeholders can identify with. The program has helped provide an avenue for improving analytical capacity among numerous stakeholders, namely the Ministry of Food and Agriculture, the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning, Ghana Statistical Services, the National Development Planning Commission, the Institute of Statistical Social and Economic Research (ISSER), the University of Ghana, and the University of Cape Coast.Based in Addis Ababa, the Ethiopia Strategy Support Program (ESSP) began its activities in late 2004, with the aim of forming broad partnerships and undertaking timely and actionable research to fill knowledge gaps, improve knowledge database management systems, and strengthen national capacity to undertake policy relevant economic analysis.Phase I of ESSP conducted a varied program of economic research and provided extensive technical and analytical support toward the establishment of the Ethiopia Commodity Exchange (ECX). Phase II (ESSP-II), which began in July 2008, places a greater emphasis on strategic partnerships and capacity strengthening, while continuing a collaborative program of capacity building, research, policy analysis, and knowledge dissemination by IFPRI and the Ethiopian Development Research Institute (EDRI).ESSP-II is country-driven and country-owned program that aims to promote sustainable development and poverty reduction in Ethiopia through policy-oriented research, institution strengthening, capacity building, and dialogue on economic and agricultural policy issues. The program's priorities are set and updated regularly by a high-level National Advisory Committee. Additionally, ESSP-II is supported by a consortium of four donors, with the understanding that national partners set the agenda. As a result, ESSP-II is structured in a way that enables close collaboration with an extensive and unlimited range of partners, including national academic institutions, private-sector and civil-society actors, technical experts in line ministries, and donor agencies.To respond effectively to Ethiopia's growing development challenges, IFPRI, ESSP-II, and the latter's advisory committee identified four key activities. The first main activity includes collaborative research with EDRI, the Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia, and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, with a focus on promoting poverty reduction and economic development in Ethiopia. The second activity focuses on the achievement of robust knowledge management to contribute to policy dialogue, strategic priority-setting, and evidence-based policy analysis. Capacity strengthening and increased knowledge dissemination within the academic and policy research community is the third activity. The final activity seeks to enhance communications and institutional linkages among policymakers, policy analysts, civil society, and other policy and research actors through joint seminars and other dissemination events.ESSP-II achievements depend on collaboration, coordination, and communication with key partners and stakeholders, including policymakers, donors, researchers, and private-sector and civil society leaders. Therefore, the program has developed formal and important links with institutions such as the Central Statistical Agency, the Ministry of Agriculture, the Ministry of Finance and Economic Development, the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, the Ethiopian Economics Association, Ethiopian universities and research institutes, and numerous private trade associations.For further details, please see: http://www.ifpri.org/book-757/ourwork/program/ethiopia-strategysupport-program.Finally, studies of the policy process (Subtheme 2.1) will provide insights on political constraints and on how the values, motivation, and power of different actors shape the policymaking process. This research is analogous to the \"constraints to adoption\" research that can increase the likelihood that new crop varieties or other technologies will be adopted. Policy research findings are more likely to contribute to policy if they fit an environment's political limits, institutional pressures, and vested interests. Changing political environments often provide opportunities for better use of research by decisionmakers. Such insights can help to increase the application of CRP2 outputs and thereby make a difference in practice.The aim of impact assessment is to evaluate the success of CRP2 in achieving its stated goals by measuring the effects of the project on intended beneficiaries, using tangible intermediate and final impact indicators. Moving from outcomes to impacts requires triangulation among quantitative and qualitative methods to identify how research has influenced policies or practice and how those changes have, in turn, affected the welfare of poor agricultural producers and rural laborers, the ultimate beneficiaries of CRP2. These methods include the following: Impact narratives: These narratives document cases where research has led to policy changes and impact on the ground. Narratives will be suggested by project teams and independently verified through interviews with key stakeholders to document the mechanisms through which research contributed to change. Ex post impact assessments: These assessments can document the impact of a particular change in policy, institutions, or markets on the SLOs of poverty reduction, food security, nutrition and health, and environmental sustainability. Wherever possible, these impact assessments will also explicitly address the differential impact of changes on men and women. Ex post studies play an important role in documenting the value of policy-oriented research, as well as in examining how the implementation of a policy affects the ultimate impact. External reviews: These reviews will assess the effects of major research projects after their completion and provide lessons for other research. Once every five years (or another agreed-upon timeframe), external reviews of the entire CRP2 will be commissioned by the Independent Evaluation Arrangement of the CGIAR on behalf of the Fund Council. These independent evaluations will provide an external perspective on research relevance and performance and will serve as an important input into the periodic revision of the CRP.Once the final structure of CRP2 is approved, a workshop will be held to finalize the impact assessment framework of CRP2. The outputs of this workshop will include  a complete set of measurable indicators at the subtheme and research theme level and more globally aggregated at the CRP level (the indicators mentioned in each subtheme of this proposal and in the performance indicators matrix in Annex 1 are initial propositions, with quantitative targets and dates to be provided at the initiation workshop, when the resource availability is known);  a baseline of the values of those indicators by target region, and the evolution of the values of those indicators by target region as expected over the CRP period;  the modalities and timeframe for collecting and analyzing the information needed for assessing the values of the indicators; and  the roles and responsibilities of the different partners in the measurement of indicators The indicators should be aligned with  the SLOs of reducing rural poverty, improving food security, enhancing nutrition and health, and facilitating sustainable management of natural resources; and  the impact pathways of CRP2, as described above. In designing the impact assessment framework, we will consult the CGIAR Social Science Stripe Review, keep a pragmatic approach (the system should be as simple as possible so as not to be too great a burden for stakeholders), and focus on the goals of M&E, which are to report on the actual progress made thanks to CRP funding, as well as to provide institutional learning about what makes research effective in influencing policies and improving the welfare of the ultimate beneficiaries.The proposed research portfolio of CRP2 addresses policy, institutional, and market challenges for global food security and rural poverty and is derived from an extensive consultation with our partners and beneficiaries. The program proposed here builds upon the ongoing programs and funding of the CGIAR centers, with CRP2 providing new integration to move from individual projects to a more comprehensive approach to the key and strategic research areas. In the first year of its operation, two-thirds of CRP2's funding is committed to ongoing restricted donor projects. As these projects are completed, funding will be freed up to develop new programs addressing critical gaps, new collaboration, and integration across research activities. In Year 2, 52 percent of the funding is from the CGIAR Fund, and by Year 3, 64 percent of the funding is new and will be allocated through the CGIAR Fund and CRP2. This funding can be allocated to filling research gaps and new programs, in addition to expanding core CRP2 research areas. During subsequent years, the remaining restricted donor-funded projects will come to a close, completing the transition. Because of this transition process, most of CRP2's research activities comprise both ongoing and new projects over the course of the three-year budget horizon.For each of the subthemes in the proposed research portfolio, we present the following:  Rationale for the research, including its goals and the processes through which those goals will be reached  Selected research questions  Proposed research activities that will be conducted to answer those questions  Tentative priorities (these priorities might be modified after the priority-setting process that will start in November 2011 [please also see Table 3.1 for a typology of countries or major subnational regions in terms of research areas]) Main partners/alternative suppliers 2 , and CRP2's comparative advantage  Expected outputs, outcomes, and impacts of the research Annex 1 (performance indicators matrix) provides an integrated view of CRP2's contribution to the SLOs at the theme level. Table 2.1 in Section 2 provides the detailed contributions of each of the research subthemes to the SLOs.Policies provide the enabling environment in which development actions occur and investment choices play out. This first theme of CRP2 analyzes which policies and investments might be better formulated to improve food security and accelerate agricultural income growth and, of equal relevance, how. It also evaluates key growth, equity, and sustainability tradeoffs associated with alternative development strategies and scenarios that provide the broader context in which policies and investments are formulated.Theme 1 consists of 4 subthemes aimed at addressing the key policy gaps identified above. Subtheme 1.1 (Foresight and Strategic Scenarios) focuses on designing scenarios reflecting emerging challenges, modeling the consequences of these scenarios, and using the outputs of the modeling to inform policy research, thereby improving existing agricultural policy and investment decisions. The Foresight program will work closely with the GCARD process. The three other subthemes center on policy analysis, with a global objective of enabling smallholders, the rural poor, and other vulnerable groups to participate in income-generating and asset-building growth. Research under Subtheme 1.2 (Macroeconomic, Trade, and Investment Policies) is designed to correct underinvestment and policy and market distortions in the agricultural sector relative to other sectors. Subtheme 1.3 (Production and Technology Policies) will strive to facilitate participation of smallholders, female farmers, rural laborers, and vulnerable groups in agricultural productivity growth and sustainable resource use. Subtheme 1.4 (Social Protection Policies) plans to increase poor people's access to safety nets, food assistance, and cash transfers to reduce their vulnerability to risks.At its core, the Theme 1 policy and investment research agenda involves the design, implementation, and dissemination of public goods tools and analyses that examine and inform strategic agricultural development choices for practitioners and researchers at different spatial levels, including the global and regional context, both macro and micro levels, for both agriculture and nonagricultural sectors.A key area of innovation in the policy and investment agenda of Theme 1 will be spatially explicit, multiple-scale analysis in which more detailed national and subnational analysis can be embedded within and bounded by regional and global contexts.To address these challenges, each of the four subthemes of Theme 1 draws on cutting-edge modeling approaches that permit macro, meso, and micro analysis of agriculture and the broader economy, in an increasingly spatially explicit way. Some examples of the economic models that will be applied are single-commodity, economic surplus models (for example, Dynamic Research EvaluAtion for Management, or DREAM) and economywide, multimarket models (such as IFPRI's national models for African countries); multicommodity, agriculture-focused, global food projection models (for example, the International Model for Policy Analysis of Agricultural Commodities and Trade, or IMPACT); and computable general equilibrium (CGE) models, such as the Global Trade and Analysis Project (GTAP) and Modeling International Relationships in Applied General Equilibrium (MIRAGE). Other research approaches include the Spatial Production Allocation Model (SPAM) and the GeoWiki supported georeferenced data analysis coupled with the application of biophysical models (for example, water resources, crop and livestock systems, and soil carbon balance) that can evaluate the potential marginal physical productivity and natural resource impacts of a range of R&D interventions.Many of these models will be adapted to address specific research questions. For example, gender will be integrated into the research to assess the differential impact of trade and macroeconomic policies on men and women. By enhancing CGE models, econometric estimations will be able to capture impacts disaggregated by the gender of the household head. Building on the GTAP database, a global database in which labor is broken down by gender and skill level at the sectoral level will improve analysis of gendered labor markets.Complementing these modeling approaches, research activities will also involve socioeconomic analyses relying on both quantitative and qualitative methods. Data will increasingly be collected at the level of individuals, disaggregated by sex and age, and at the household and community level. Experimental/randomized and quasi-experimental (matching, regression discontinuity) designs will be used. Where appropriate, survey work will be complemented by experimental/\"games\" work (for example, to elicit preferences and willingness to pay and to understand gender and age differences in response to social protection interventions), as well as web-based \"crowd-sourcing\" techniques for data collection and data and model validation.Over the next half century, the world's population will increase by roughly 50 percent-mostly in poorer countries-and become increasingly urbanized. Aggregate demand for food, feed, fiber, and biofuel products is projected to double. 3 Just keeping pace with this scale of growth would represent an unprecedented global food security challenge, but agriculture is also being subjected to increasing stresses from socioeconomic, environmental, and other drivers of change. Growing competition for water and biomass resources, increasing variability in cereal yields in Sub-Saharan Africa, and slowing productivity growth in the rice-wheat systems of South Asia's Green Revolution belt-one of the world's primary breadbaskets-are all symptomatic of the stresses being faced by major farming and food systems. These changes are rapidly shifting the structure, composition, and distribution of the agricultural production and farming systems that support the livelihoods of smallholder producers and the rural poor. The interplay of underlying drivers 4 has ushered in an era of increasing variability, uncertainty, and risk. Given these challenges, there is an increasing demand for incorporating more strategic foresight into decisionmaking in many areas of agricultural research and agricultural development for the developing world.To help meet this demand, this subtheme will develop a CGIAR Strategic Foresight Platform consisting of sets of spatially explicit data, scenario-building and modeling capacities, and a global network of analysts and partner scientists. This platform will be linked to the mobilization of foresight activities identified through Global Conferences on Agricultural Research for Development (GCARD) 2010 to bring together a wide range of partners active in foresight considerations at global, regional and national levels. Mobilizing diverse perspectives and models in foresight-linked prioritization of agricultural research for development is recognized as essential to identifying best bet approaches for successful impact from research for development. CRP2 will build on the good fit between the delivery capability of the CGIAR CRP2 and the convening role of GFAR and the actions supported in the GCARD \"forward thinking\" initiative in creating a strategic platform between foresight initiatives that mobilizes a diversity of models, perspectives and analyses. The latter will be brought together with the development of critical analyses and research on specific issues that can be mobilized through the expertise of the CGIAR centers and mobilization of the funding available under CRP2, to address particular scenarios and their implications in different development contexts.The Strategic Foresight Platform resources will  articulate \"plausible\" sets of future trends in drivers of change and their potential interactions;  assess the potential effects of those changes on food security, agricultural growth, welfare improvement, and the environment; and identify policies and investments that will deliver the most beneficial outcomes while limiting undesirable tradeoffs. This work builds on research that IFPRI and other CGIAR centers have conducted for more than a decade and that has already provided useful input into research agendas and policy debates. Many of the individual research activities comprising this subtheme are thus underway, but there has been limited integration across activities. CRP2 provides the multi-institutional framework and funding levels required for true integration of scenario assessment methodologies and innovative data management and modeling to create the foresight platform.This subtheme is designed to help policymakers, researchers, and practitioners set priorities, formulate more effective policies, and better target agricultural investments and interventions in a context of rising variability, uncertainty, and risk. Overall, the goal of this subtheme is to improve the design and cost-effectiveness of policies and investments that can significantly improve future food security, human welfare, and natural resource outcomes at local to global scales.The initial set of research questions from which our core international public goods research agenda will be distilled is as follows: How and where will the socioeconomic, technological, and environmental drivers of global change affect future food security and human well-being?  What stresses will this change impose on social, market, and natural resource systems? What are the implications for international agricultural research policies and priorities and strategic portfolio design, by system, theme, and region?  Which regions and agroecosystems will be most exposed to change, and which food systems and groups of individuals (men, women, better-off, and poor) are most at risk?  What combinations and sequences of enabling policies and agricultural investments hold most promise for advancing global development goals for growing populations under alternative future scenarios?  How can the tradeoffs in meeting different development goals be minimized to promote more equitable, inclusive, and sustainable growth?Any foresight and scenario research must begin with a baseline. Research in this subtheme will therefore involve establishing and maintaining a comprehensive and coherent set of databases quantifying the baseline conditions and trends in key variables (for example, change drivers, evaluation model parameters, and variables and outcome indicators). Through this activity, researchers will forge strategic alliances with groups collecting primary data critical to modeling and impact assessment and invest in activities that fill critical data gaps. Examples of strategic data partnerships to be developed include sentinel data networks designed to generate data on critical policy-relevant indicators, such as the Longitudinal Village Studies of the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics; the World Bank's Living Standards Measurement Survey initiative for improved agricultural panel data for Africa (LSMS-ISA); and IFPRI's census-type survey of all the households in 26 natural villages in Guizhou Province, China, in 2005China, in , 2007China, in , and 2010. Global agricultural monitoring platforms (CIRAD, FAO) could also be important sources of data. Other strategic data partners will include, but not be limited to, the Consortium on Spatial Information (CSI), HarvestChoice, and Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators (ASTI).Scenario building often involves many formal and informal and quantitative and qualitative approaches. It includes decisions about appropriate baselines, drivers of change, intervention options to be included or excluded, and a range of technical options conditioned by the specific analytical tool to which the defined scenarios will be applied. This activity will draw on the perspectives of all relevant stakeholders, not only to ensure that the right questions and expectations are being tested, but also to enhance engagement, ownership, and, ultimately, impact. One extremely relevant approach to development and documentation of scenarios (that includes climate change as a driver and technical change as an intervention) is currently being developed and tested by the Global Futures project, which will become part of CRP2. 5 Links through GFAR will also allow open linkage and evaluation of situations and scenarios by different methods such as comparison among diverse foresight evaluations and by cross-comparison with models examining the same questions, but based on assumptions beyond productivity, such as nutrition supply and sustainability. These latter may themselves create research needs in adding data, or locality context.Biophysical models (for example, water resources, crop and livestock systems, soil carbon balance) will be used at a number of scales to generate more disaggregated and reliable insights into the marginal physical productivity and natural resource impacts of a range of R&D interventions. To decide on the required scope and operating scale of such models and ensure their appropriate calibration and validation, researchers will engage in dialogue and collaboration with other CRPs, seeking to maximize synergies across scarce, specialized capacities within the entire CGIAR portfolio (for example, cross-center crop modeling collaboration built into Global Futures and HarvestChoice initiatives). A key factor influencing inter-versus intra-CRP choices in providing modeling capacity is the required degree of coupling between the biophysical and economic models. For example, can the models be run independently or sequentially, simply sharing common data elements, or, as is increasingly the case, are they best dynamically linked in the simulation process? Such choices are also relevant across biophysical models (for example, optimum degree of coupling between crop and livestock productivity models). All major biophysical models will be formulated in a geo-referenced framework and will be harmonized as much as possible to make analytical results more coherent. For instance, they will draw from common databases on climate, soil, terrain, production, demographics.To evaluate the economic, environmental, and welfare consequences of change, we will also apply a range of analytical approaches, from single-commodity, economic surplus models to multicommodity, agriculture-sector-focused, global food projection models, and CGE models. The models of choice for addressing specific research questions will depend on, among other things, the geographic scale of relevance, the nature of the interventions to be evaluated, and the range of relevant outcome indicators required. This research will build on the current intercenter effort involving IFPRI, the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), ICRISAT, the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), and others, through links with the Global Futures for Agriculture project and with the HarvestChoice project. Much of the research will involve better assessing environmental and welfare outcomes and analyzing gender-disaggregated impacts.We will develop tools to improve our ability to assemble and compare scenario results and to examine the impacts on (1) different intervention goals, such as income growth, poverty reduction, food security, improved nutrition, and resource sustainability; (2) micro-versus macro-level interventions; and(3) key policy and investment strategies, such as public versus private, rural versus urban, and on-farm versus off-farm.While short-term priorities will be based on commitments in the existing research pipeline, the strategic priorities of this subtheme will be increasingly aligned to delivering on the System Level Outcomes (SLOs) prescribed in the CGIAR Strategy and Results Framework, and new issues as they are identified, relying heavily on the consultative processes facilitated by GFAR as part of its contribution to the overall GCARD Roadmap. Within these system-level frameworks and mechanisms, we will regularly review research, outreach, and capacity-building priorities to ensure that available resources are being effectively used and that the Strategic Foresight agenda properly reflects changing client needs.As a general principle, highest priority will be given to  maintaining and developing baselines, driver scenarios, and foresight evaluations that address the strategic policy and investment knowledge needs of the CGIAR and its primary stakeholders;  a Strategic Foresight Report and organizing a Foresight Conference on at least a biannual basis; and  a web portal to deliver Foresight research products. a greater range of strategic evaluation studies would be conducted;  more ambitious model, data functionality and reliability goals would be established;  the Foresight Report and Conference would be delivered annually;  outreach products would be more diverse, targeting different research, practitioner, and media audiences; and  a more extensive set of user capacity-building products and services would be developed.At all funding levels, high priority will be placed on partnering opportunities with the Foresight Academy proposed as part of the GCARD Roadmap. The Academy concept is aimed at fostering and accelerating professional growth of national and regional strategic planning capacities, and as such could represent a major tool for meeting the outreach expectations for this subtheme (GFAR 2011) (see section on Partnerships below).As is the case for other subthemes and themes of CRP2, a range of client, partner, and stakeholder groups have important interests in shaping, co-implementing, or utilizing the core research outputs and findings of this subtheme. However, unique to this subtheme is the direct interest of other CGIAR-related bodies or processes in the Strategic Foresight activity and outputs: SRF: By definition, Strategic Foresight capacities and analysis are an integral part of the SRF process. Indeed much of the data and analysis used in the current SRF was supplied by members of the proposed Strategic Foresight team. The revised Consortium SRF that will be developed in the coming three to five years (SRF 2011) will play an even greater role in achieving a more effective Consortium agenda for delivering on the four SLOs. Subtheme 1.1 will play a major analytical role in the development of all future SRFs. ISPC: The ISPC has specific, mandated responsibilities with regard to CGIAR Strategic Foresight. It is tasked with providing the Fund Council and the Funders Forum with \"foresight advice on trends and emerging issues, as well as potential strategies of addressing them related to the CGIAR Strategy and ResultsFramework. In undertaking this role the ISPC will act as commissioner and coordinator of any required foresight studies, drawing on expertise within the Consortium and beyond, as appropriate, to undertake them.\" Early dialogue with the ISPC Chair and members suggest their focus will be in identifying key, emerging scientific issues and assess how best for the CGIAR to broach them. The ISPC will not have the resources to undertake its own modeling work and is more likely to commission studies to be undertaken by the CRP2's Strategic Foresight team. The IPSC sees the role of CRP2 as \"evaluating plausible scenarios with regard to the impact of various research outputs on the SLOs, and then using these analyses to help guide and prioritize the CGIAR research portfolio, and the global research portfolio more generally\" (Cassman, personal communication, April 18, 2011). GFAR: As part of the overall GCARD Roadmap, GFAR has identified several roles and goals related to improving national and regional capacities in strategic foresight. These are being taken forward as a collective action, including through CRP2 and IFPRI, termed the forward thinking initiative, this is supporting biannual meetings among those concerned with foresight studies, to enable specific common issues to be addressed from a variety of perspectives at global and regional levels. It will be crucial for the CRP2 Strategic Foresight subtheme to forge strong partnerships with GFAR, particularly in two areas: (1) CRP2 will take advantage of and contribute to the various stakeholder consultative forums that GFAR convenes and facilitates; and (2) CRP2 will play a role in GFAR's activities to develop strategic foresight capacities through, for example, foresight \"academy consortia.\" CRP2 might, for example, help develop training modules, provide relevant data and analytical tools and support, or engage interns or academy students in evaluation studies. We plan early dialogue with GFAR to develop partnership ideas and plan for a set of strongly mutually beneficial outputs.More broadly, the set of proposed partners can be summarized as follows: CGIAR system management and oversight entities responsible for planning, monitoring, and evaluating the priorities, investments, and impacts of the entire system (SRF, ISPC, and GFAR);  other CRPs and other themes of CRP2 that need to undertake periodic strategic analyses from a more focused regional, thematic, commodity, or system perspective;  participants in regional and international agricultural research and development processes and institutions, such as the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP), whether or not these are part of a formal GFAR process;  foresight and strategic research groups in national agricultural research systems such as CAAS, Embrapa, and ICAR; and  public and private funders of international agricultural research and agricultural development efforts (for example, bilateral donors, multilateral banks, private companies, and philanthropic organizations). Research partnering with these groups will leverage and extend existing knowledge bases and experiences of CGIAR centers-for example, spatial targeting, systems productivity modeling and impact-assessment tools, databases, and expertise. A new cross-center/cross-CRP Strategic Foresight community and mechanism, when established, will support strategic ex ante evaluation capacity development across the CGIAR (and appropriate partners) for the purposes of priority-setting, targeting, and investment decisionmaking.The main alternative suppliers of CRP2 on Subtheme 1.1 are the following (in alphabetical order): CRP2 will link teams and individuals working on foresight, targeting, and priority-setting issues across CRPs, and in so doing strengthen and deepen the Consortium's internal capacity to generate and act on strategic information in the planning and designing of its research portfolio. Thus, the knowledge, tools, and data generated in this process will not only serve to enhance the capacity of individual CRPs to better target and prioritize their own work, but will also provide consistent information for Consortiumwide evaluation. This cross-CRP evaluation platform that will be delivered by CRP2 can serve as a broad accounting framework for assessing the coherence and consistency of impact expectations across individual CRPs.One example of how CRP2 will foster cross-CRP engagement and the nurturing of a Consortiumwide community-of-practice will be to convene (annually or biannually, depending on funding) a Strategic Foresight Conference that will bring together CRP specialists and their research partners working on these issues. They will present latest findings, review methods and data, and participate in this venue for technical capacity-building workshop sessions.There are several reasons why hosting a world-class strategic foresight capacity and network in CRP2 makes sense compared to relying on external suppliers: It provides an ongoing platform for foresight and scenarios research to frame and analyze foresight and allocation questions for the Consortium.  The cross-CRP evaluation platform provided by CRP2 will serve, as noted above, as an \"accounting framework\" and reality check across the expectations of impact from individual CRPs.  CRP2 institutions have collaborated for a long time directly as partners with most of the leading alternative suppliers listed above.  The strategic planning and strategic directions are understood and owned by the Consortium and its staff.  CRP2 modeling tools are being regularly expanded and updated, have been used for many years by CG centers, and are contributing to other past and future global foresight exercises, including the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, GEO-IV and GEO-V, the IAASTD, AgMIP, and others.The outputs of this research will include the following:  Relevant, documented, and accessible datasets and scenarios showing likely drivers of change in the coming decades; how changes are likely to affect future agricultural production, food security, and poverty; and which policies and investments will help deliver the most beneficial outcomes  Analytical and capacity-building tools for scenario and foresight assessments of key partners in developing countries and regional and subregional organizations  Qualitative and quantitative knowledge products, including peer-reviewed scientific publications that will advance understanding of strategic assessments in this complex global environment  An actively supported Strategic Foresight community of practice, served by a web portal that continually provides information on strategic scenarios and global conditions, that will work in partnership with GFAR and will plan and support a biannual (or annual) Foresight Conference and Strategic Foresight Report These outputs will provide a picture of the most serious challenges the world faces in combating food insecurity, poverty, and environmental degradation. The datasets, tools, and projections will help to guide strategic investment in the CGIAR and, through partnership with GFAR, in NARSs. They will thus make important contributions to the effort of developing effective policies and investments in a rapidly changing and risky environment at both global and national levels. International development donor organizations have expressed demand for such data and projections on the priority needs and potential for agricultural research and other policy reforms, so we are confident that they will use the outputs of this work to increase the effectiveness of agriculture-related investments.The main outcomes of Subtheme 1.1 will be the following: Greater capacity of targeted decisionmakers and policy and investment practitioners to access, interpret, and use strategic foresight knowledge products and findings Growing influence of strategy foresight products and findings on policy and investment decisions  Increasing interest and understanding of general audience and media  Cohesive relationships and understanding of technical expertise among CGIAR centers and other partners  Enhanced relationships and increased cooperation with the private sector and public donorsThe contributions of Subtheme 1.1 to achieving impacts and contributing to the SLOs are described in Table 2.1 in Section 2.Macroeconomic, trade, and nonagricultural policies have important roles for sustainable and pro-poor agricultural growth in developing countries. The impact of these policies on food security and small producers' livelihoods has increased in recent years as a result of increased globalization, international financial crises, global macroeconomic imbalances, and differential growth patterns between industrialized and developing countries. Moreover, a critical constraint in promoting pro-poor agricultural growth remains lack of adequate public investment.Thus, this subtheme will analyze both the general policy environment and the variety of country contexts in order to identify the macroeconomic, international trade, public and private investment, and nonagricultural policies that will maximize the contributions of agriculture and the rural economy to food security, poverty reduction and smallholders' incomes, and sustainable resource management in different types of developing countries. It will investigate how to better tailor domestic fiscal policy and public investments to include the agricultural sector as a key player in the development process, by reducing the bottlenecks faced by the sector, with a special emphasis on the rural poor and disadvantaged groups. This research will examine the complementarities between sound macroeconomic and trade policies, on one side, and government investment, on the other, through a series of strategically selected country-level studies. It will also examine options for prioritizing, sequencing, and financing public investments; test the effectiveness of public spending compared with other policy interventions; and support institutions in decentralizing public investment implementation. Equally important, this subtheme will address capacity building to improve the efficiency of the agencies that provide public goods and services, and develop tools for monitoring and evaluating public investment and strengthening capacity in the developing countries to enable them to conduct their own impact evaluations.The CGIAR is uniquely positioned to address these issues. No other institution has the clear mission and the expertise to analyze how these macroeconomic, trade, and investment policies may affect global food security and small producers' income in an increasingly complex world. How should national and global trade and macroeconomic policy agendas be shaped to ensure inclusive agricultural growth, poverty reduction and food security?  What is the impact of international migration, foreign direct investments, and international cooperation on food security and poverty reduction?  What role should agriculture play in economic growth, poverty alleviation, and food security in different types of developing countries?  What are the priorities for public spending and the appropriate sequencing of public resources to achieve food security and improve small producers' income efficiently, and how do these priorities and sequences change over time and across space?  How can institutional mechanisms and public finance responsibilities of different tiers of government be designed to ensure efficient use and effective allocation of public resources?Identifying more effective international and national macroeconomic and trade policies Macroeconomic factors (monetary, fiscal, trade, and exchange rate policies) and trade openness increasingly shape trade specialization and have consequences for poor people in developing countries. This research will examine their impacts and their interrelations with agricultural, climate change, and biofuel policies in developed countries. A dynamic CGE model including a large set of policy tools (macroeconomic factors, energy, land use, and trade) and accounting for household heterogeneity will be used to study how shocks in world markets affect households based on the structure of their consumption, the source of their income, and their dynamic reaction to these shocks (for example, migration, trade specialization and investment in education). Researchers will also use an enhanced model and database to examine the impacts of trade policies on men and women at the national and household levels. By providing objective analysis of how global macroeconomic and trade issues affect poor people in developing countries, this research will generate knowledge that can be used by developing-country delegates and other stakeholders in international negotiations and various arenas (G20, the World Trade Organization, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and multilateral development banks). This research will also identify (1) the policies and investments required to promote equitable economic development; and (2) the international institutional setting needed to support social inclusion. While other organizations focus on similar general topics (for instance, WTO on trade, IMF on macroeconomics, World Bank on development policies in general), CRP2 looks at these issues from the point of view of food security, poverty, and sustainable agriculture. It offers the unique combination of a specific mandate; a focus on research-based capacity building in the public, private, civil society, and academic sectors; institutional and political independence; adequate scale; and recognized research capabilities.Researchers will explore how trade and trade policy can benefit developing countries by encouraging greater specialization or diversification. They will complement the consistent analysis provided by CGE modeling with more flexible models that deal with the heterogeneity of farms and households, and they will integrate detailed information on transportation costs 6 and value chains. Spatial, partial equilibrium models for key commodities will be developed to capture detailed information about specific value chains, drawing on data from commodity-specific research done in other CGIAR centers. Lastly, political economy models will investigate how endogenous processes have resulted in heterogeneous trade policies and how these policies affect poor men and women. Researchers will identify optimal country-level trade policies in situations where supply of agricultural products is constrained and provide new models and product or market-level parameter estimations that other researchers can use. Attention will be paid to the consequences of specific specialization patterns on gender and to the use of trade policies to mitigate gender inequalities. A global database of domestic trade margins and transportation costs within and across borders will be set up to support the modeling work. This research will be performed in close association with the work on value chains (see Theme 3) to improve understanding of the different stages separating the producer from the consumer. The modeling will assess how imperfect price transmission affects trade policy outcomes. These results will help to define infrastructure or competition policies that can reinforce the expected gains from, or mitigate the potential costs of, trade liberalization and accrue gains for consumers and producers.Poor people have only limited capacity to respond to adverse shocks in food prices. Researchers will develop methodologies to identify excessive price volatility in global food prices, identify the groups likely to be most negatively affected by price volatility (Ivanic and Martin 2008;Robles and Torero 2010), and propose policies to mitigate excessive volatility and its impacts. The research team will explore the definition and scope of volatility relevant for producers and consumers and develop methodologies to identify how price volatility is transferred from international markets to domestic markets. Researchers will also study the role of trade and trade policies in managing price fluctuations in agricultural markets to help design policies that balance the needs of agricultural producers, poor consumers, and industries that use agricultural products as inputs (Díaz-Bonilla, Diao, and Robinson 2004). We will also examine how a country's trade patterns and reliance on foreign markets affects domestic price volatility, and develop a stochastic analytical framework to capture these random shocks and the behavior of private and public agents in this context. We will take account of the policies (including export and import restrictions) set up by some countries to stabilize domestic prices, which potentially also export volatility to world markets and thus to smallholders in other countries (Bouët and Laborde 2010)-an important issue for ongoing global trade negotiations and governance.In many developing countries, remittances of international migrants contribute significantly to household incomes and government revenues. Aside from remittances and impacts on labor markets, migration can also encourage trade flows arising from new social networks. International migration, differentiated by skill level and by gender, affects the supply of domestic labor and may have differentiated impacts on the agricultural, industrial, and service sectors. Research activities based on econometric estimation and global CGE modeling will involve investigating the mechanisms through which international migration of male and female workers and remittances affect household income and structure, the agricultural sector, and national economies through changes in domestic labor markets, income transfers, and their role in financing the current account deficit. The research outputs will include policy options that will help international migration to ensure income growth and stability for poor households and limit gender disparities. A global, gendered database on migration and remittances will be developed to support the analysis and provided as a public good to other researchers.The proposed research will also analyze how foreign direct investment (FDI) (and its associated effects on macroeconomic variables) and technology transfer affect the agricultural sector in developing countries. Research will explore how FDI affects the economics and the political economy of trade negotiations and trade liberalization. Foreign direct investment in land and its consequences for land markets and the agricultural sector will also be examined. A global database on FDI will be developed from external data and linked to the global CGE model. The main output will be knowledge to guide policy formulation regarding the mechanisms through which FDI affects agricultural households, the agricultural sector, and developing economies.Lessons from cross-country comparative research will illuminate the different pathways and conditions of successful development approaches. Based on a typology of developing countries, we will examine the factors and strategies that have led to successful or failed rural and agricultural development outcomes in each type of country. We will investigate countries' patterns of adaptation and advancement, as well as how changes in demographic structure affect household agricultural production and labor decisions, agricultural productivity, technology use, and food security. Activities such as South-South learning workshops and field study tours will provide opportunities for researchers and government officials from African, Asian, and Latin American countries to discuss and compare development experiences.The proposed research will further identify multiple pathways for the rural poor to move out of poverty traps. Building on CGIAR research on rural farm and nonfarm employment opportunities (Haggblade, Hazell, and Reardon 2007) and on a conceptual framework 7 to understand the policy options needed to promote sustainable rural employment, researchers will examine conditions and policies that broaden income generation and job creation for women, and the role of formal and informal sectors in this process. Through a macro-spatial, micro-integrated analytical framework, this research will identify constraints to creating employment opportunities for different types of countries and different household groups. It will also design growth scenarios based on agricultural growth targets at the sector or commodity level set by national governments or defined in commodity-oriented CRPs. A similar approach has been applied to selected African countries within the CAADP framework (for example, Diao et al. 2011).Researchers will examine the role of small and medium-sized town development in rural growth and income creation, especially in agroprocessing and nonagricultural activities, and the policy options that facilitate the development of these activities. Besides, they will look at the role of migration and remittances in rural development and identify policies that support the expansion of pro-poor nonfarm activities, and especially that increase women's participation in nonfarm activities. Ways to develop regionally based public services, urban land-use planning, and rural infrastructure for water and energy will be identified. Finally, research will assess barriers to market entry for small enterprises in rural areas. The work will cover micro, spatial, and economywide aspects of rural-urban linkages in an integrated way.Many governments and their development partners have expressed a need to prioritize their scarce public resources, but they lack the information needed to translate this principle into action. 8 Building on the expertise the CGIAR centers already possess, this research activity will conduct econometric analysis of the relative returns to different types of public investments in agriculture (for example, research, extension, and irrigation) and rural areas (for example, roads, energy, education, and health) at national, subnational, and regional levels. Based on these estimated returns, it will estimate the public financial resources required to achieve specific development impacts, such as reducing poverty by 50 percent or achieving an 8 percent yearly average rate of agricultural growth. This activity will also study the poverty and rural development implications of financing public investment from different sources. The current literature does not explain how decentralization reforms have affected the intergovernmental allocation of budgets for agriculture and how these allocations have affected performance in the sector. This activity will place particular weight on the role and impact of agricultural budgets in the context of decentralization reforms. It will also investigate the relative outcomes associated with the level or participation of women in the decentralization process.To our knowledge, no analysis has been undertaken on the effect of disaggregated public spending on different sections of the income distribution in developing countries. Such analysis is critically needed to evaluate the quality of public spending as a pro-distribution instrument and in targeting the poor. This research activity will (1) measure the impact of the level and composition of public spending on income distribution; and (2) estimate various indicators of distribution within the household sector itself as a function of fiscal variables, while controlling for other factors. We will conduct critical studies of implemented policies on public expenditures to better understand potential underlying structural problems, to develop potential solutions, and to estimate the budgets needed to implement such policies.The success of this research will ultimately depend on developing countries' capacity to implement effective monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems for public investments. The types of partnerships that will be built for this research reflect the relative capacities in different subregions: in the subregions that consist of mostly small countries with relatively weak national capacities, regional and cross-country analyses and partnerships will be more cost-effective than country-by-country approaches.Methodologies developed in large countries with higher capacity, such as China and India (Fan 2008), will have to be refined and adapted. Tools and frameworks for data collection and M&E will be regularly updated, as will global databases on public and private investment in agricultural research and development (such as ASTI and Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System, or ReSAKSS).The research activities comprised in this subtheme are closely linked. In the event of a shortfall in funding, it will be important to maintain the ongoing research activities and prioritize the regions and countries identified in the typology. the role of global macroeconomic, trade, migration, and FDI on poverty and food security in developing countries;  identifying the pathways through which domestic macroeconomic, trade, and nonagricultural policies affect agricultural growth, employment, food security, and small producers' income at the national, local, and household levels;  prioritizing, sequencing public investment, and improving its efficiency.Many research activities have global relevance. In terms of regional priorities, this subtheme, like CRP2 as a whole, will focus on Africa and South Asia.We plan to include various partners at different stages of the research cycle: institutions with experience on agricultural and rural development, which can contribute expertise in economic modeling, international trade, analysis of public investment, and gender analysis; potential partner institutions include African Growth and Development Policy (AGRODEP) modeling consortium, the Poverty and Economic Policy (PEP) Research Network, GTAP, and the African Union;  researchers and policy analysts in developing countries, including Bangladesh, Brazil, China, India, and Vietnam among many others, at the national, regional, and subregional levels, with whom collaboration will generate the policy and contextual relevance of the research, as well as help to develop cross-and incountry analytical capacity;  civil-society groups, intergovernmental institutions, and private-sector advocacy groups (for example, the Gender Responsive Budgeting [GRB] initiative of United Nations Development Fund for Women [UNIFEM], the International Budget Partnership, umbrella agricultural cooperative unions, and chambers of commerce), which are the primary targets of the research findings;  government bodies, including ministries of finance and agriculture and parliamentary standing committees on agriculture, as well as donor agencies, particularly in CSSP countries; and  international and regional development agencies, such as the World Bank, FAO, IFAD, ADB, African Development Bank (AfDB), and IDB, that can use findings in setting their investment priorities and improving the efficiency of their investments. 9The main alternative suppliers of CRP2 The main comparative advantages of CRP2 with respect to these alternative suppliers are the following: A specific focus on how macroeconomic, trade and investment policy interacts with food security, poverty reduction, and agricultural and rural development  Large datasets in global trade, economywide modeling and public investment related to agriculture, rural development, and food security  History of building national capacity facilitated by large presence in and strong collaboration with national institutes in developing countries  Ongoing direct research input and policy advice provided to G20 and WTO platforms and negotiations  Existing collaboration with many of the alternative suppliers listed aboveSpecific outputs and/or outcomes of each activity have been identified above. This research will provide the analytical basis and country-level capacity to support the design and adoption of macroeconomic, international trade, and nonagricultural policies, public investment, and fiscal policies that take agricultural growth and rural development into account for the more efficient functioning of the food, nutrition, and agricultural systems at the subnational, country, regional, and global level. This subtheme will produce readily applicable tools for developing-country governments. These tools include (1) typologies to assess countries' deficiencies, opportunities and risks both at the international and national levels; (2) specific simulations to gauge the effect of macroeconomic and trade policies; (3) a body of studies pointing out where and how to invest scarce resources to boost the agricultural sector under alternative conditions; (4) methodologies and tools for monitoring and evaluating public investment, and (5) databases on public expenditures and investment in agriculture (for example, research, irrigation) and nonagriculture (for example, education, health, transportation, defense, social security) that will be made publicly available and downloadable via the ASTI, ReSAKSS, and AGRODEP websites. 10 Research results will be reported in scholarly and policy-oriented publications.The results of this subtheme will inform developing countries on  how to improve their trade negotiations through sounder evidence of the impact of different reforms;  how to design macroeconomic, trade, and nonagricultural policies for pro-poor agricultural growth and for improving small producers' income including women farmers; and  how to make investments more efficient, including better budgetary allocation policies across sectors and within agriculture. Typically, in international negotiations, the interests of the poorest and most vulnerable are neglected. Sound research to reduce the asymmetry of information among stakeholders is a key element in shifting policies toward a more inclusive outcome and in ensuring that the concerns of the poorest are addressed directly or indirectly through specific redistributive policies. Although the global governance agenda will likely remain contentious in the years ahead, the research activities proposed and the evidence and options provided by the modeling innovations at the product-and country-level will play an important role in informing the debate and policymakers.CRP2 will work closely with various national governments and stakeholders to ensure that CRP2's analyses on pro-poor macroeconomic and nonagricultural policies are used in formulating policies, strategies, and decisions for achieving pro-poor agricultural growth and increasing small producers' income. Partnerships with national collaborators and think tanks will ensure that research results are used by various stakeholders.With regard to more efficient investments, the research outcomes will include positive influences on public finance policies in decentralized countries, such as policies affecting the revenue and expenditure assignments of different tiers of government (local, state, and central/federal) in agriculture and other sectors key to agricultural and rural development. These also include policies on the design of intergovernmental transfers and systems to monitor the spending performance of the different tiers of government.The contributions of Subtheme 1.2 to achieving impacts and contributing to the SLOs are described in Table 2.1 in Section 2.As recently reaffirmed by the CGIAR Stripe Review of Social Sciences, the effort to enhance agricultural productivity has been and should remain at the core of CGIAR research, comparative advantage, and expertise. The goal of this subtheme is to increase productivity and sustainability of agricultural production systems 11 in Africa, Asia, and Latin America in the face of growing food demand; increasing scarcity of natural resources, particularly land and water; and other emerging drivers of global change. To contribute to this goal, research under this subtheme will identify production and technology policies that enable pro-poor, gender-equitable and sustainable growth in agricultural productivity. This work will also seek to increase research capacity related to food, agriculture, and rural development, in partnership with governments, the private sector, and civil society. Research activities will investigate policies that support aspects of sustainable agriculture, from germplasm to natural resource management. Using a variety of tools and data sources (see Section 6), researchers will look at market-agent interactions, biophysicalenvironment linkages, and institutional and policy constraints to assess and identify policies that support sustainable agricultural productivity growth. Given that land, water, and energy use are interlinked, and agricultural technology policies are often associated with increased energy use, our assessments of policies on sustainable agricultural productivity improvement will also consider the potential impacts on renewable energy sources. Because effective production and technology policies need supportive governance systems and institutions, research under this subtheme will build on Theme 2 research.We will answer the following critical research questions: What policies and strategies can facilitate the conservation, development, dissemination, and effective use and management of plant and animal genetic resources and improved crop cultivars and animal breeds?  What policies and strategies can sustainably increase agricultural productivity along the land-water-energy-food nexus?  What policies and strategies can increase technology dissemination, delivery, and adoption?  What policies and strategies can expand opportunities to diversify agricultural and nonagricultural incomes while also sustaining the natural resource base and enhancing biodiversity? In each of these areas, we will conduct ex ante and ex post impact assessments and analyze key factors such as the comparative advantage across locations and production systems; the roles of the public, private, and civil society sectors; and the contribution of farmers, communities, and consumers to the innovation process. We will also place particular emphasis on assessing the suitability of different technologies for women, producers in remote areas, landless farmers, and farmers without tenure security.Research activities on how to better develop, disseminate, exchange, use, and manage improved crops and animal breeds and neglected and underutilized species (NUSs) will continue to be conducted in collaboration with the commodity-based CGIAR centers and CRP3, within programs such as the Cereal Systems Initiative for South Asia (CSISA). Research will focus on both micro-and macro-level analysis of the development and deployment of improved cultivars and animal breeds-a fundamental part of the CGIAR mandate, a comparative advantage of the CGIAR network of centers and programs, and a historically proven success that requires continued attention on the policy side.At the micro-level, the research will focus on understanding firm-and farm-level responses to the development and deployment of improved cultivars and breeds, and on the legal, regulatory, and policy frameworks that influence these responses. At the macro-level, the research will focus on the impact of national and regional policies on supply and demand for major agricultural commodities and NUSs and the food security implications of these policies. Given persistent low productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa, concerted efforts will be made to expand research in this region to enhance capacity and policy development with governments, NARSs, producer organizations, and public-private partnerships. National case studies and cross-country comparisons of activities related to commodity crops and NUSs derive lessons from experiences in Asia and Latin America and encourage knowledge transfer to Sub-Saharan Africa.An important part of this work will be to support the sustainable conservation and use of NUSs. 12 This activity will examine the constraints faced by these species along the value chain, support policies that promote their cultivation and use, and study the roles of women in conserving, developing, using, and earning income from NUSs.Another important component of this work will focus on improving policies related to the functioning of seed systems in Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean. In many countries, market liberalization has encouraged the emergence of commercial and nongovernmental seed producers alongside the entry of domestic and foreign technology seed developers. However, public policies and investments designed to encourage the movement of genetic materials, information, and technologies between public researchers, technology companies, seed producers, and farmers often fail to improve smallholders' access to improved seeds. Effective policies related to seed access, seed regulation, intellectual property rights, seed trade harmonization, fiscal incentives for research and development, management of public innovation, and compliance with the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) are critical. Our research will address this topic across a range of countries, regions, crops, traits, and technologies.In the coming years, given current projections for population and economic growth and climate change, maximizing agricultural output while minimizing resource input and adverse impacts on ecosystems and the environment will be crucial. This research activity will focus on policies in support of maximizing agricultural productivity under all natural resource constraints, including land, water, and energy, to increase food production sustainably. Up to now, most agricultural technology policies have incorporated only part of this nexus (for example, technology policies on land management might focus on the fertilizer-land productivity nexus but might not assess associated greenhouse gas emissions or water uses). This research will identify policies that can shape the development, dissemination, and marketing of technologies to increase agricultural productivity using more resource-efficient methods and multifunctional technologies, as well as policies that will make these technologies more accessible to poor women and men. New research on low-external-input agriculture, integrated soil nutrient management, and energy-saving low tillage systems will study the productivity of these practices and their income potential in regions. Tradeoffs between sustainability and productivity associated with low-energy waterlifting and application devices will be identified and researched, in close collaboration with CRP5. Many of the technologies that reduce pressure on natural resources already exist-such as integrated soil fertility management, technologies and economic incentives to conserve irrigation water use, and policies and incentives to promote carbon-sequestering practices-but adoption rates are low. This research activity will therefore continue to identify bottlenecks that hinder technology uptake and strengthen capacity to enhance the adoption of combined, resource-use efficient land, water and energy management strategies.This research will also assess how to reduce adverse impacts of sustainable renewable energy production, such as biofuels, on the natural resource base (land, water, and energy), and on national and global food security. Some studies have been ongoing in this area, such as the \"Biofuels and the Poor\" project, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, but more research needs to be done to assess the most effective policies in this area. Assessing the food-land-water-energy nexus also requires new research on policies to encourage consumers to promote on-farm fuelwood production and improved stoves as part of the shift from unsustainable fuelwood to sustainable biomass or modern fuels, as well as the cost of this transition. We will use experimental approaches and randomized controlled approaches to identify policies, investments, and innovative market and financing mechanisms that can help facilitate organizations and agreements, including the CBD (http://www.cbd.int/recommendation/sbstta/?id=10689), the International Treaty for PGRFA (ftp://ftp.fao.org/ag/agp/planttreaty/gb3/gb3w16e.pdf), the FAO Global Plan of Action for PGRFA (http://www.globalplanofaction.org/id/gpa/), and the Chennai Platform for Action (http://www.underutilizedspecies.org/documents/PUBLICATIONS/chennai_declaration_en.pdf). this transition. We will also consider the significance of this shift for agriculture, agroforestry, ecosystem health, and human health. This activity will work closely with CRP5 and CRP7. The research will be implemented in selected Asian countries where energy and resource use is high, as well as in selected countries in Sub-Saharan Africa where resource intensity is relatively low. Analyses will be implemented across scales, production systems, and regions-using econometric and simulation model-based quantitative analyses combined with qualitative analyses-and include the study of impacts and policy options for female producers.Moving along the scientific frontier from biotechnology to nanotechnology, synthetic biology, and other advanced scientific applications allows for more rapid development of plant and animal varieties. Biotechnology and GM crop research is rapidly providing applications to enhance yields, nutrition, resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses, or other desirable traits. Similarly, nanotechnologies offer considerable potential for helping the poor-for example, by increasing plant input use, raising animal vaccine efficacy, and reducing postharvest losses. Synthetic biology and other advanced applications hold similar promise. However, gaps in research prevent their potential from being realized. These gaps include: weak biosafety regulatory systems in developing countries; a limited analysis of the constraints in access, knowledge, and affordability; insufficient investment in risk assessment and management; questions about market acceptance; and limited attention to intellectual property rights. This research will assess food-and nutrition-related science and technology policy, with attention to the socioeconomic opportunities and risks of advanced applications for resource-poor farmers, food-insecure consumers, biodiversity, and trade. It will emphasize innovations that are safe and accessible to poor people. The research specifically aims to identify and evaluate the benefits and risks of advanced applications for the poor, to analyze the distribution of risks and benefits by gender and occupation, and to help anticipate the emerging institutional and marketing challenges specific to these new technologies. Work will include (1) ex ante assessments and research prioritization of applications for the poor in specific countries or commodities (supporting NARS involvement); (2) ex post evaluations of agricultural and food technologies adopted in the emerging economies that are leading in this field (Brazil, China, India, and South Africa); and (3) analyses of the governance, institutional, and market constraints and solutions to enable the most promising high-benefit/low-risk technologies to reach and be used by the poor at a global, regional, national, or subnational level. For major staples, this work will be done in collaboration with CRP3, but we will also consider how the methods already in use for major crops can be applied to overcome constraints affecting NUSs. This work will also address the regulatory reforms necessary for farmers and consumers in developing countries to benefit from GM crops and other advanced applications, building on the integrated program of research, capacity development, and outreach of the Program on Biosafety Systems (PBS), and leveraging partnerships with advanced research institutes working on relevant applications. The project will examine gender-differentiated issues that may affect adoption and use of GM crops in developing countries.This research activity will assess the costs and benefits of alternative science, technology, and innovation policy and marketing strategies, including those related to biotechnology, high-input technology, conservation agriculture, mainstream agricultural practices, precision agriculture, organic agriculture, crop/livestock/tree interactions, enhanced use of NUSs, and associated standards and quality-assurance systems, such as certification methods. We will look into how to make such policies and strategies more accessible to women and low-income farmers by (1) analyzing their potential payoffs, in terms of yield growth and food security, taking into account the spatial variability of crop production, climate, soil, and projected climate change; (2) assessing the market-level consequences of broad adoption of these technologies and associated policies at a regional and global scale; and (3) identifying suitable governance systems and policy frameworks (in collaboration with Theme 2).While this type of analysis cuts across several CGIAR CRPs, the activity described here is unique in scope. First, the activity addresses policy and institutional issues in a manner that is holistic and systems-based rather than crop specific, taking an integrated macro-level policy view of micro-level evidence on crops, traits, resources, policies, and institutions. This means that research on individual technologies will allow for analysis of interplays between policies on commodities (e.g., minimum support prices for food staples), policies on external inputs (e.g., subsidies on fertilizer, machinery and equipment), policies on seeds and traits (e.g., public and private investment in hybrids and GM crops conducive to ZT and RCTs), and so on. Second, this activity will provide more comprehensive and crosscutting approaches across farming systems and technologies to identifying opportunities for women. While this area of inquiry has received some focus in the past, intensification and mainstreaming of gender-related analytical work will be an essential component of future work. Third, this activity builds on work conducted at IFPRI, other CGIAR centers, and partner institutions under programs such as the Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators (ASTI) initiative, which compiles, analyzes, and publicizes data on institutional developments, investments, and capacity in agricultural R&D at national, regional and global levels; Harvest Choice, which generates knowledge products to help guide strategic investments to improve the well-being of poor people in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia through more productive and profitable farming; and other established research initiatives. The integrated assessments described here will be implemented across all developing countries and regions. Partners include NARSs; private companies in biotech, hybrid seed, inputs, processing, and packaging; CGIAR commodity centers; government regulatory authorities and focal points; farmer organizations; women's organizations; trade organizations; and regional associations in Africa and Southeast Asia.Historically, models of extension have typically been top-down and expensive to implement. More recent models are demand-driven and pluralistic (involving public and private sectors, NGOs, and civil society), and they focus on helping farmers learn how to obtain information on a wide variety of services rather than simply training them to use available production technologies. However, there is little systematic analysis of the effectiveness of these new models. Important questions remain about how extension and advisory services function and what roles different actors should play in supporting innovative extension approaches. More also needs to be learned about appropriate roles for public, private, and civil society organizations in pluralistic extension systems designed to support value-chain development-and how these roles vary by commodity, land use system, gender, and the target group's level of wealth. Anderson (2007) has called new extension approaches \"a chronically under-researched field.\" This activity will make advances in five areas for which satisfactory outcomes have yet to be achieved in developing countries: Understanding how rural communities obtain and spread new technologies and information and how extension services can make the best use of existing individuals and networks  Determining the key factors affecting the impact of innovative extension approaches, such as volunteer farmer extension programs, farmer field schools, rural resource centers, and short message service (SMS) information systems  Assessing the impact of innovative extension approaches by commodity, land use system, gender, social setting, and region  Identifying how extension systems can support value-chain development  Identifying effective strategies for reaching both women and men and ensuring that they are able to obtain and use the information This research will address the challenge of reaching female farmers. The number of female extension agents remains low, and extension services are often biased toward men. Even programs oriented toward women fail to adequately consider and address the heterogeneity of female farmers. Strategies need to be context-specific to reach women effectively and should involve a comprehensive diagnostic approach to identifying diversity among female farmers (Quisumbing and Pandolfelli 2010). This activity will be implemented in two to three countries each in Latin America and the Caribbean, Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, and the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), in close consultation with CRP3 and CRP6, the private sector, NGOs, farmer organizations, and NARSs, as appropriate. A key partner at the global level will be the Global Forum for Rural Advisory Services.Agricultural and livelihood diversification can be an effective strategy for improving food security, increasing incomes, and coping with risk and uncertainty, particularly in the face of climate change. This research will focus on what enterprise types and combinations (for example, NUSs, legumes, livestock, and trees) can improve poor farmers' incomes and identify the technology policy and capacity needed to support these enterprises. Economies of scale may dictate that greater efficiency and higher incomes are achieved when individual households and even communities specialize in particular enterprises. Therefore, the research will assess trade-offs between specialization and diversity by area, commodity, social setting, and degree of market access, and it will highlight the advantages of such strategies and policies for female farmers and the poor.Other research will study the potential of private-public partnerships to facilitate nonfarm employment and agricultural income diversification and determine the key factors that contribute to effective linkages between the public and private sector and how they vary across space and by commodity. This activity will also assess approaches to implementing private-public partnerships and building trust and production and marketing arrangements that are mutually beneficial for both smallholders and private enterprises. Our assessments will cover partnerships involving local traders and processors and those involving multinational corporations, because both types can provide important benefits to the poor. This research will also examine the lessons learned from experiences with sustainability standard schemes such as organic and fair trade products and payments for environmental services (biodiversity, freshwater resources, and carbon sequestration). It will assess how such schemes can best be implemented, their efficiency and equity impacts, and how the poor and women can gain better access to certified markets. Research will be implemented in Latin America and the Caribbean, Asia, and Sub-Saharan Africa, across a range of commodities (tree crops and annual crops; commonly grown crops and NUSs).Key partners at the global level may include the Committee on Sustainability Assessment (COSA), a global consortium of institutions and UN agencies developing and applying innovative ways of measuring and understanding sustainability in the agrifood sector, as well as certification bodies, NGOs, and other entities facilitating the implementation of sustainability standards.All four research activities in this subtheme are fundamental to CRP2's thrust to support sustainable propoor agricultural growth. They have been, and will remain, at the core of CGIAR research and comparative advantage and expertise (see CGIAR Science Council 2009). Besides, they are closely linked with other CRPs and CGIAR centers. Therefore, we have chosen to give them equal priority at this point. The priority-setting process described in Section 3 will probably lead to differentiation in priority levels between activities and regions for this subtheme, either in terms of funding allocation or in terms of sequencing over time.To ensure that priorities for technologies are adapted to each region and country, research on policies and strategies that facilitate access to improved crop cultivars and animal breeds is undertaken with over 40 national agricultural research and extension institutions, in close collaboration with regional organizations such as APAARI, FARA, FORAGRO, and AARINENA, under the GFAR umbrella. The research on policies to promote carbon sequestration in agricultural systems will involve a range of applied organizations and initiatives such as the African Climate Policy Centre, the African Centre of Meteorological Applications for Development (ACMAD), the Climate Prediction and Applications Centre (ICPAC), AGRA, the World Wildlife Fund, the Katoomba Group, the National Research Conservation Center (NCRC-Ghana), the World Land Trust, Forest Trends, and the Clinton Foundation. This activity will also work closely with CRP7's agricultural mitigation theme.To achieve goals in women's agricultural productivity, we will work directly with women's groups (such as the self-help groups in India and District Women's Associations in Zambia); farmer organizations; NARSs, both on the research and extension side; government departments; and the private sector. This effort will continue and increasingly engage directly with the private sector, given its large research development and dissemination budgets and the potential for increased engagement in poor areas. Furthermore, the active participation of community-based organizations is essential and will be promoted, for example, in work with the MSSRF, Professional Assistance for Development Action (PRADAN, India), or PROINPA. CRP2 will also disseminate its technologies, methods, and tools in socially and culturally acceptable ways to reach poor beneficiary groups.Researchers under this subtheme will work very closely with several other CRPs (see  CRP5: Collaboration with CRP5 will cover land, water, and ecosystems. CRP6: Collaboration with CRP6 will address certification and quality assurance issues. CRP7: Collaboration with CRP7 will look at climate change, agriculture, and food security.The main alternative suppliers of CRP2 The main outputs of research activities under Subtheme 1.3 will be the following:  Synthesis of evidence on effective germplasm management systems for food and nutrition security  Scenario analyses and interactive tools on food, land, water, and energy use;  Design of policies, strategies, and capacity-building materials for resourceefficient technologies  In-depth analyses of biotechnology and nanotechnology impacts, policy challenges, and knowledge gaps  Platforms and other collaborative mechanisms for promoting neglected and underutilized species  Assessments of key technology opportunities and extension modalities  Decision-support tools for policymakers on strategies for sustainable intensification of agriculture  Design of technology policies and capacity building for rural diversification, including nonfarm activities  Innovative certification schemes for enhanced productivity, biodiversity, and rural incomesThese outputs should translate into the following outcomes:  Improved smallholder access to better quality seeds  Increased investment and improved regulatory systems to support biotechnology and nanotechnology  Increased food security and income opportunities arising from local species  Increased investment in public and private research and extension systems  Improved access of rural poor to promising high-benefit/low-risk technologies  Enhanced diversification of rural activities  Increased adoption of policies that sustainably increase agricultural productivity  Adoption of resource-efficient policies  More effective policies in support of value chain integration for local agrobiodiversity We will strive to make our research findings relevant and available to a wide range of people and groups who can effectively act on them. We will make use of regional forums, GFAR, and universities to ensure that our data and findings are peer-reviewed and shared as widely as possible. Through our work with partners, we will strive to ensure that our research on raising agricultural productivity sustainably will be demand driven and owned by NARSs, governments, donors, NGOs, and the private sector.The contributions of Subtheme 1.3 to achieving impacts and contributing to the SLOs are described in Table 2.1 in Section 2.The principal drivers for achieving the goals of this CRP-increased food security and incomes for the rural poor-are necessary to meet the CRP's objectives, but they are not sufficient in themselves. Certain groups may not be able to benefit directly from these activities-for example, households with low and nonexistent land endowments and individuals suffering from illnesses and disabilities. In addition, many of the world's poorest households live with great risk, related, for example, to weather and price variability and health. When health, climate, or price shocks hit, households may cut back on consumption, reduce investments in education, or sell productive assets. Even the potential of an uninsured shock has welfare costs if it discourages smallholders from adopting potentially more productive technologies. The malign effects of risk and the goal of ensuring that all households experience growing incomes while maintaining or increasing their asset bases provide the rationale for including social protection in this CRP.Social protection refers to a set of benefits available from the state to the individual or household to reduce hunger, poverty, vulnerability to poverty, and other forms of deprivation. Social protection encompasses three broad sets of public action (see Figure 4.1): Social safety nets: Safety nets are targeted noncontributory programs that transfer resources to poor households, such as cash welfare payments, school feeding programs, subsidies to goods purchased by the poor, and public works schemes. Publicly provided state contingent insurance: Here, financial assistance is triggered by an event-for example, drought, illness, or unemployment. Eligibility and benefit levels are typically based on past contributions, not current poverty status. Elements of social-sector policies: Such policies complement social safety nets and include fee waivers for the use of primary healthcare facilities, interventions to prevent malnutrition in preschool children living in poor households, and free primary education. Within the universe of social protection interventions, this subtheme will focus on social safety net programs and forms of state-contingent insurance relevant to poor people in developing countries. The goal is to clarify how safety net and insurance programs can promote agricultural development and increase rural incomes by creating assets, as well as reduce risk and protect assets from shocks so that the rural poor who cannot directly benefit from enhanced agricultural growth are not left behind. As such, it addresses two system-level outcomes-rural poverty reduction and improved food security-both through the direct impact of social protection on these outcomes and through its indirect impact on the ability of poor rural households to take up new agricultural technologies.Work carried out under this subtheme will link to value-chain work within this CRP (to understand how risk can affect the adoption of new technologies and how these risks can be reduced or mitigated; see Theme 3) and on gender and assets (see Subtheme 2.4). The work on the effects of risk, the consequences of shocks, and the role of social protection in mitigating shocks will link with CRP7. How are benefits from social protection interventions distributed across beneficiaries, in particular between men and women and within households?  Under what circumstances does social protection stimulate agricultural income growth, asset preservation and accumulation? Which farmers benefit the most? Are these benefits gender differentiated?  How can innovations in insurance markets provide better health and livelihood protection for poor households, and men and women and their assets? How can these innovations complement and strengthen publicly provided safety nets and existing semi-formal and informal insurance arrangements?Targeting beneficiaries, distributing benefits, and assessing impact on assetsSocial protection programs must be carefully designed if they are to deliver the greatest possible benefit to the neediest people in the most efficient way. Sound evidence can inform this design, and countries have shown themselves to be eager to adopt social protection programs that are backed up by such evidence (as in the case of CCTs). Many questions remain, however, about how best to design and implement social protection interventions for different populations and in different countries. This research will address how to target the beneficiaries of social protection interventions, determine the distribution of benefits across and within households, and assess the impact on food security, poverty, and asset protection and formation. Researchers will work with stakeholders, including governments, civil society organizations, and donors, to design and implement demand-driven evaluations of pilot programs. These evaluations will assess how the implementation modality affects asset creation and the targeting of benefits across and within households. Aspects to be assessed will include the form in which resources are provided to households (cash, vouchers, food items, or other in-kind goods), delivery mechanisms (subsidies, direct payments, use of ICTs, and other technologies), and whether the transfers are conditional or unconditional (that is, whether disbursement is contingent on specific behaviors, such as children's school attendance). Where feasible, researchers will assess multiple types of interventions-for example, those providing both food and cash-to facilitate comparative analysis. This work will also examine the interface between transfer modalities and the gender and generational dimensions of resource allocation within households-for example, the perceived and actual differences between transfers targeting women or children and those targeting households more generally.The role and effectiveness of social protection interventions in Latin America are well understood, but their role in Sub-Saharan Africa is less well understood. In South Asia, some evidence exists on the impact of public works programs, but much less evidence is available on direct versus conditional transfers. For these reasons, we anticipate that the bulk of this work will be carried out in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Research activities will involve collecting socioeconomic data using both quantitative and qualitative methods. Where appropriate we will use double differenced randomized control trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental methods (such as matching methods and regression discontinuity designs) combined with qual-quant process and operations research.IFPRI and other centers have undertaken past work on social protection, but the focus here on the interplay between modality, gender, and impact is new. Initial work on this topic was funded externally in 2010. Because the transfer component of this work is expensive, we will continue to work with partners who will provide funds for both the transfer programs and the data collection. CRP funds will be used to support the analysis and dissemination of results.Potential synergies between social protection and the delivery of agricultural innovations, including those that strengthen the value chain, are underexploited. Poor households often fail to adopt new innovations because they lack the necessary working capital to get started or are unable to risk failure. Conceptually, it is clear that combining agricultural innovations with social protection programs, particularly social safety nets, can help overcome these constraints, but evidence of these complementarities and their implications for the design of social protection and agricultural interventions is lacking. An important aspect of this work will be the distributional consequences of such interventions. This work will involve dialogue at national and regional levels to inform policymakers of these potential synergies.Certain components of social protection, such as insurance, may be more efficiently provided by the market rather than the state. Under this research activity, we will work with private insurers to explore the design of affordable insurance contracts. We will also work with governments and the private sector to determine appropriate institutional arrangements for the provision of such insurance (whether reinsurance of publicly provided safety nets, the provision of individual insurance through public-private partnerships, or the provision of insurance for semi-formal and informal organizations). At the household and individual level, we will undertake survey and experimental work to determine the willingness and ability of poor households to pay for insurance products, such as health and livelihood insurance. Insurance itself is an innovation, so we will identify constraints that prevent or inhibit poor households from adopting or purchasing innovative financial products designed to reduce risk. Based on earlier analyses of the sources of risk of greatest concern to the poor, work will initially focus on the development of weather and health insurance, beginning in East Africa and South Asia, and thereafter gradually expanding to other parts of the developing world.The three research activities are closely linked, so the successful implementation of this subtheme requires that all three activities move forward. Nevertheless, the first activity on targeting beneficiaries, distributing benefits, and assessing impact is better funded across the various institutions and initiatives, and its policy findings are more established compared with the activities on social protection and agriculture and social protection and risk mechanisms. Hence, in the event that cutbacks are required, in order to scale up high-impact work on the last two activities, we will scale back the use of CRP funds for the first activity, expanding it more slowly than originally envisaged.Collaborators in implementing this research include developing-country governments at national, regional, and local levels, including ministries of finance and agriculture and those responsible for implementing social protection programs; international agencies such as the World Food Programme, IFAD, World Bank; regional banks such as ADB, AfDB, and IDB; civil society organizations; developing-country research institutes; and the private sector. These partners will supply the resources needed for the transfers (such as money and staffing), as well as collaborating in the design and implementation of interventions. In addition, these collaborators are the primary audience for the research outputs and outcomes produced.The main alternative suppliers of CRP2 on Subtheme 1.4 are the following (in alphabetical order): Research in this subtheme will provide evidence that can be used to better design social protection and agricultural interventions and that will be communicated along all three impact pathways (informing research, influencing policy development, and providing policy recommendations, see Section 3).Research outputs will focus on creating knowledge on  the design of social protection interventions that more cost-effectively protect and increase the asset bases of poor households;  the design of social protection interventions that reach neglected and vulnerable groups;  improved understanding of linkages between social protection and agriculture; and  improved understanding of the gender-differentiated impacts of social protection interventions. Work on this subtheme will contribute to the following research outcomes: Interactions with governments, donors, and other development community stakeholders, combined with further dissemination of research outputs in newsletters, briefs, and materials understandable to project staff (as well as peerreviewed publications), will contribute to improved social protection interventions and better integration of social protection and agricultural growth policies at the national level. We will engage with these actors during the development of specific interventions and as part of general policy discussions on the appropriate role and scope of social protection. These interactions and others that take place during process and impact evaluations will allow us to understand the needs of stakeholders, the constraints they face, and the most effective means of communicating new knowledge and its implications for policy.  Evidence from this research will contribute to the design of new insurance products and services that poor households can use to protect their consumption and assets, based on interactions with both suppliers of insurance products (privateFor new policy ideas to be translated into changes on the ground, two conditions need to be met: (1) policy ideas must be formulated into policies; and (2) policies must be adequately implemented. Subtheme 2.1 (Policy Processes) will study research-policy linkages and policy implementation processes in order to increase the likelihood that science-and evidence-based policy options will be adopted into progressive reforms.One major obstacle to policy implementation arises from the failure of governments and markets to provide rural services and infrastructure. Subtheme 2.2 (Governance of Rural Services) will address this issue by identifying governance arrangements suitable for providing critical rural services and for supporting effective and equitable farmer organizations, resource user groups, and producer groups.Tenure security and capacity for collective action are prerequisites for reducing poverty and enabling more effective management of common pool resources and environmental services. Moreover, agricultural policy processes often suffer from the lack of voice of smallholder farmers and women, who make up so much of the agricultural labor force in developing countries. How can sound arrangements for property rights and collective action be achieved, and how can small-scale producers be empowered to increase their voice in policy decisions and to gain access to investment and market opportunities? These are the questions that Subtheme 2.3 (Collective Action and Property Rights) will strive to address.Translating increased productivity and incomes into sustainable rural development requires ensuring that poor people are able to accumulate the tangible and intangible assets that will allow them to generate sustainable livelihoods. Such changes often go beyond single policies and require appropriate institutional structures. To address this challenge, Subtheme 2.4 (Institutions to Strengthen the Assets of the Poor) will focus on creating enabling institutions for the poor.Although the focus of each subtheme is distinct, complementarities between the subthemes will be maximized by regular sharing of methods and results.Partnerships for participatory action research between CGIAR research institutions and policy actors as well as implementing organizations will be used to improve the links between research, policymaking, and policy implementation. Theme 2 will also focus on capacity building in these areas. The theme is designed to distill lessons that can be adopted by a wide range of organizations involved in policymaking and implementation. By focusing on ways in which research can be used more effectively in agricultural policymaking and implementation, the theme will increase the overall institutional and policy impact of CGIAR research.CRP2 will use a range of methods to identify mechanisms for improving the policy processes and institutions critical to increasing agricultural incomes and strengthening the assets of poor people.Quantitative methods will include surveys of individuals, households, users, and providers of infrastructure and services as well as actors involved in policy processes. Where possible, research will use longitudinal surveys and panel data to facilitate research on changes over time. Quantitative methods for analyzing policy processes will go beyond the existing political economy models developed in agricultural economics and apply innovative approaches to link political bargaining models with economywide models, taking into account the role of voting behavior, lobbying strategies, and belief systems (see Henning 2008;Henning, Saggau, and Hedtrich 2010). Quantitative methods for analyzing asset accumulation will include randomized allocation of interventions to control or treatment groups, propensity score matching to construct a counterfactual comparison group, regression discontinuity designs that exploit eligibility criteria to create the counterfactual, and instrumental variables approaches (see Ravallion 2008 for a discussion of program evaluation methods).Experimental game methods and randomized experimental design will be used with infrastructure and service providers, as well as collective action groups. New applications of experimental games will enable us to study the effects of rule changes on cooperation and provide feedback to user groups to help them increase. Social network analysis will be applied to model, measure, and promote the inclusiveness and use of networks, including policy networks, to promote collective action, innovation, and use of best practices. Qualitative methods will enable evaluators to hear the impact of an intervention \"in their own words,\" as well as to better understand the processes that underlie the success or failure of the intervention. Participatory assessments, participatory mapping methods such as Net-Map (Schiffer and Waale 2008), life histories, focus groups, and key information interviews are among the qualitative methods that will be applied to this theme.Policymaking processes that are inclusive and based on evidence are an important dimension of good governance. However, agricultural policy processes are often dominated by vested interests and lack of inclusion and participation, which limits the voice of smallholder farmers and women in policymaking. Likewise, there are often weak analytical capacity and limited political incentives to use research-based evidence as a basis for agricultural policymaking. These factors constrain the effectiveness of policy research, including that conducted by the CGIAR. This subtheme specifically addresses this challenge. Only a better understanding of the strategies that can make agricultural policy processes more inclusive and evidence-based will enable us to create strong demand for our research products by policymakers and their advisers, which is an essential element of an effective impact pathway.The political economy of agricultural policymaking has been subject to extensive academic research, mostly with a focus on formal models and cross-country regressions. A recent review by Swinnen (2010) points to the limitations of this approach and emphasizes the need to combine modeling approaches with detailed knowledge of individual countries and other methods such as analytical narratives. Here is where CGIAR policy researchers have a comparative advantage, thanks to their experience with modeling approaches on the one hand and their extensive country presence and involvement in policy processes on the other. Accordingly, this subtheme will combine innovative methods to model political decisionmaking processes (Henning, Saggau, and Hedtrich 2010) with innovative participatory approaches to engage stakeholders, including farmers' and women's organizations, in policy processes (Schiffer and Waale 2008). This research will also serve other CPRs by identifying the factors determining the political feasibility of policy options and improving our knowledge on the types of interactions and communications among researchers, stakeholders, and political decisionmakers that can promote effective policy changes. Special priority will be given to strategies that increase the voice of smallholder farmers, including women, in the policy process. The subtheme will also identify the political factors that promote policy implementation, considering that lack of political incentives for implementation often undermines the effectiveness of policy change (Birner and Resnick 2010).This subtheme can be compared to \"constraints to adoption\" research in technical fields: it will identify the factors that facilitate or limit the uptake of policy research findings.Key questions include the following: What are the determinants of political feasibility of agricultural policies and policy reforms?  How can participatory policy processes and research-based evidence contribute to pro-poor policy change?  Which factors promote the effective implementation of pro-poor policy decisions?  Which factors increase the performance of the political system in responding to opportunities and challenges for pro-poor agricultural development?These research questions will be investigated from a comprehensive perspective of the overall agricultural and food system, taking into account where decisionmaking and rule-setting power lies and acknowledging that the state formal institutions often play a limited role in determining policy outcomes. Consequently, research under this subtheme will address the interactions between the state and civil society (local and international NGOs and associations), the private sector, and donor agencies, all of whom play an important role--especially in the context of weak states. This research will explore diverse levels and types of policies and will also address the influence that international and regional policymaking has on national and subnational policy choices. Research will focus on three new areas, which are particularly important for increasing the effectiveness of CGIAR research.Since smallholder producers, and especially women smallholders, have limited political voice, agricultural policies generally fail to support smallholder agriculture or are biased in favor of larger commercial enterprises. Examples are agricultural input subsidies or concessions for forest and fisheries exploitation. Institutional reforms that aim to empower smallholder producers and resource users face particular political obstacles because they involve the devolution of state authority. Other areas of CRP2 and the policy research in other CRPs focus on identifying the policies and institutional reforms that are most suitable to support smallholder agriculture, building on existing CGIAR research. We will increase the effectiveness of this research by analyzing the political economy of formulating and implementing such policies under this new priority area. We will place emphasis on collaborating with CGIAR centers' research activities on institutional reforms, such as the devolution of authority for managing irrigation systems, forests, fisheries, and rangelands to community-based organizations, agricultural research and extension systems and livestock services, and agricultural market reforms. Research will focus on political factors that have been relatively neglected in the existing agricultural economics literature on agricultural policies, such as the role of leadership and policy beliefs.Political participation is a key topic for pro-poor politics-both in terms of understanding which mechanisms allow for effective and efficient collective political action and in terms of studying the role of participation through voting behavior via institutions of representative democracy, such as parliaments. The three research activities described are presented in order of priority. As already explained, this research not only provides valuable information on its own, but it has been specifically designed to complement other CGIAR policy research. The full budget proposal includes standalone research on the policy process; if budget constraints apply, the research will initially focus on and integrate with projects that complement other policy research under CRP2. This integration will allow research in this area to be conducted with lower budgets.For this research subtheme, CRP2 will build partnerships with research organizations specializing in political science and agricultural policy analysis, including institutes in the US, Europe, and Australia, such as the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, the LICOS Center for Institutions and Economic Performance, the University of Leuven, Belgium, and departments dealing with agricultural policy analysis at the Universities of Kiel and Hohenheim, Germany. These partnerships will allow for synergies between the specific political science expertise of these institutions and the expertise of the CGIAR in agricultural policy as well as its close involvement with partner institutions and policy processes at the country level. Equal emphasis will be placed on partnerships with university institutes and political science think tanks in the countries where the research is being conducted, such as the Department of Political Science at the University of Ghana, Legon, the Department of Political and Administrative Studies at Chancellor College, University of Malawi, and the Center for the Study of Law and Governance at Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.Given the nature of this research subtheme, partnerships with policymakers and stakeholders are particularly important as well. Apart from staff in ministries and departments of agriculture, who have traditionally been strong partners of the CGIAR, new partnerships will be developed with elected political representatives, ranging from parliamentarians to local council members, and with civil society organizations, including farmers' and women's organizations. In the work on policy processes, researchers will intensify their collaboration with FAO, and especially FAO's country-level representatives, who are typically strongly connected to agricultural policymakers and stakeholders in the respective countries. Partnerships will also be developed with the associations that represent small-scale private sector organizations engaged in agribusiness. Finally, to strengthen the capacity of the partners for participatory and evidence-based policy-development, researchers will work with institutes that train elected representatives, policymakers, and civil society organizations.The main alternative suppliers of CRP2 on Subtheme 2.1 are the following (in alphabetical order):  Greater role and voice of women, smallholders, and the poor in formulation, design, and implementation of policies affecting them IFPRI's Country Strategy Support Programs will provide a platform for dissemination and outreach such that evidence-based research results can facilitate public dialogue on key issues at various levels of government, civil society, and the private sector. In addition to direct work with stakeholders in the research under this subtheme, another avenue through which outputs of policy process research will be used is by informing other policy research, including other subthemes of CRP2. Regular communication with other research teams in CRP2 will therefore be an important channel for increasing application of this research.The contributions of Subtheme 2.1 to achieving impacts and contributing to the SLOs are described in Table 2.1 in Section 2.Smallholder-based agricultural development depends on the effective provision of many types of services (such as agricultural research and extension, finance and insurance, land administration, and food safety regulations) and rural infrastructure (such as rural roads, electrification, postharvest processing, and commodity storage). Efforts to improve rural service and infrastructure provision in recent decades have included governance reforms that, for example, involved local communities and the private sector in providing services and assigned a coordinating, regulating and facilitating role to the state (World Bank 2007). These efforts have often had limited success, and there are persisting knowledge gaps about which governance arrangements best fit a specific situation. For example, it is unlikely that the rural poor will benefit from better access to inputs and services unless there is better knowledge of how to develop wellfunctioning commercial input supply systems or successful farmer-driven extension systems. In view of its geographical and subsectoral coverage, the CGIAR is in a unique position to promote cross-country learning on what governance arrangements work best where and why.Against this background, the goal of this subtheme is to contribute to the formulation of more effective, poverty-oriented, and gender-sensitive policies and governance arrangements that can support the provision of services and infrastructure essential for crop and livestock production, forestry, and fisheries. To reach this goal, the research will  identify innovative institutional arrangements to provide services and infrastructure, involving the public sector, the private sector, and civil society organizations; and  identify and enhance governance reform strategies that strengthen the capacity and the incentives of the organizations involved in implementing agricultural policies and regulations. Which governance arrangements ensure that agricultural research, extension, and education systems and other institutions in the agricultural innovation system are effective in promoting innovation in agriculture, especially among male and female smallholder farmers?  Which governance arrangements are most appropriate to ensure effective regulatory services in agriculture, such as biotechnology, biosafety, food safety regulations, quality control of inputs, regulation of agrochemicals and veterinary drugs, and standards and labels?  Depending on context-specific factors, what is the appropriate institutional set-up for managing rural infrastructure 13 in support of smallholder agriculture? How can such institutions be more inclusive in terms of gender and marginalized groups?  What are the appropriate regulatory frameworks for agricultural finance and insurance to ensure that the different risks facing rural lenders (such as banks) are recognized and that the soundness of lending institutions, including the protection of deposits, is assured?  What are the most appropriate governance structures for the institutions in charge of land administration and management, including conflict resolution regarding land?A wide range of academic institutions and think tanks are studying governance reforms such as liberalization, decentralization, and public sector reforms, but this research often fails to address the application of governance reforms to agriculture and natural resource management-the specific area of focus of this subtheme. This is an area in which the CGIAR has a clear comparative advantage.Public sector reforms are essential for (1) creating an enabling environment for the private sector and NGOs; and (2) effectively providing the services and infrastructure that allow markets to function.Research in this area will focus on the governance reform strategies for ministries, departments, and agencies responsible for agriculture, livestock production, fisheries, and forestry, including public sector research, extension, and education organizations; regulatory agencies; agencies in charge of road management; and agencies in charge of land registration and management.Agriculture depends on a mix of centralized and decentralized services. Since some subject areas, such as food security and the prevention of crop and livestock diseases, require central coordination, some services are most effectively organized at the level of agroecological zones or the national level. Others, such as extension services, can be decentralized to the community level. Countries may also benefit from delegating some agricultural subjects, such as agriculture-related regulations, to the supranational level.The appropriate level of political, fiscal, and administrative decentralization or regional integration for agricultural services also depends on a range of country-specific conditions, such as government capacity and scope for elite capture at different levels.Better service and infrastructure provision also requires management reforms in the areas of financial and human resource management, to strengthen capacity and staff incentives, improve the working environment, and reduce undue political interference. Research in this area will focus on innovative approaches, including e-governance (for example, for land registration and program implementation), to resolving these longstanding problems that affect the performance of agricultural institutions.In all governance reforms relating to agriculture, it is essential to build the capacity of farmers to demand better services and infrastructure and to hold providers accountable. Such \"demand-side\" governance reforms include ensuring that farmers-whether male or female, large-scale or smallholders-are represented in organizations providing infrastructure and services. Empowerment strategies include participatory planning, monitoring and evaluation methods, participatory budgeting, citizen report cards, complaint mechanisms, social audits, and right-to-information approaches. Farmers' organizations can also be empowered to award service contracts and become service providers themselves--for example, in the case of dairy cooperatives. Research in this area will focus on the factors that influence the success of such reform strategies, paying special attention to strategies that build the capacity of inclusive farmers' organizations representing the voice of smallholders and both male and female farmers.Within this subtheme, the highest-payoff activities are those that deal with services that support agricultural innovation, land administration, and management of rural infrastructure.Activities under this subtheme will involve policymaking and implementation organizations in order to catalyze changes along the impact pathway. At the policy level, it will be important to work with actors involved in policy processes, such as parliamentarians, members of the executive, policy planning units in the relevant ministries, elected and administrative members of local governments, producers and agribusiness organizations, and the media. A range of advocacy groups, including women's and indigenous people's groups, will be targeted to enhance the influence of research outputs on policies that shape service provision.To pilot and evaluate new institutional arrangements, CRP2 researchers will seek partnerships with providers of services and infrastructure in the public and private sectors and civil society organizations. Examples of these types of organizations include agricultural research, education, and extension organizations; land administration institutions; forestry agencies and forest user groups; agricultural banks and insurance companies; regulatory agencies; and NGOs and farmer organizations, including cooperatives. Because these organizations are directly involved in service provision, engaging them in the research process will facilitate the transfer of knowledge so that they can in turn deliver better services to their clients. Special attention will be paid to working with institutions that train agricultural service providers and strengthen the capacity of service users, especially in terms of women's ability to hold agricultural service providers accountable. The CGIAR will also collaborate with international organizations that support governments in their efforts to improve agricultural service provision, such as FAO or OIE. Another set of partners will consist of development partners and international financial institutions that finance reform processes for agricultural services and infrastructure. An example of this collaboration between the CGIAR and other global organizations in the field of agricultural governance is the newly established Global Partnership for Land Governance Assessment, which includes FAO, IFAD, UN-Habitat, the World Bank, and IFPRI (with IFPRI housing the partnership secretariat).The main alternative suppliers of CRP2 on Subtheme 2.2 are the following (in alphabetical order): The research outputs in this subtheme will provide a range of policy options for delivering more effective and equitable services to smallholders and the rural poor. Research will identify key factors that influence the suitability of different governance arrangements for agricultural service and infrastructure provision and provide tools for assessing governance arrangements, including arrangements for controlling corruption and creating a conducive business environment in agriculture. The research activities will generate learning among the implementing organizations by facilitating collaboration among the public and private sectors and civil society organizations involved in providing infrastructure and services. These partnerships will promote capacity development and cross-country learning, thereby promoting institutional change at the implementation level and leading to efficient infrastructure and service provision in response to the needs of the rural poor. For example, the Global Partnership for Land Governance Assessment convenes panels of national experts to undertake land governance assessments, which engage high-level policymakers to identify priorities for improvement in land governance services. This leads to identification of priorities for research, with findings taken up not only within the countries of the research, but also internationally through the network of other organizations in the global partnership. The effectiveness of the research under this subtheme will be measured in terms of recipients of infrastructure and services based on defined quality per unit of investment.Additionally, this research will facilitate collaboration with institutions in charge of training, service delivery personnel employed at universities, civil service colleges, local government training institutes, and vocational training institutions for agriculture. In addition to the specific research outputs derived from the activities outlined above, the findings of the research will be integrated into training modules and material used by these organizations to increase the multiplier effects of the research. Evaluations of the determinants of effective and efficient delivery of public services to smallholder farmers and the rural poor, and of the determinants of access to these services  Innovative methods to design rural services that improve the productivity and welfare of the poor  In-depth analyses and insights on how public services can be more genderequitable, using innovative gender-disaggregated data collection methods The contributions of Subtheme 2.2 to achieving impacts and contributing to the SLOs are described in Table 2.1 in Section 2.Farmers, fishers, pastoralists, and forest-dependent communities are struggling to maintain and improve their livelihoods in the context of intensifying resource competition. A number of trends are jeopardizing these producers' livelihoods, including increased integration of international agricultural markets, increased investments in agricultural resource assets and natural resource extraction, growing populations, a shrinking and degrading resource base, new markets for environmental services including carbon sequestration, and the growth of biofuel at the expense of food crops. Producers need secure access to land and other natural resource assets (forests, rangelands, water, and fisheries) to achieve sustainable natural resource use and agricultural production systems, because property rights give producers incentives and authority for long-term investment. At the same time, coordination is needed to manage resources and develop livelihood strategies beyond the individual farm level (Meinzen-Dick et al. 2002). Collective action and property rights provide a fundamental basis for managing natural resources, addressing climate change, and reducing resource-based conflict. Collective procurement of agricultural inputs and services and collective marketing of produce can lower transaction costs for smallholders and address market failures. Thus tenure security and capacity for collective action are prerequisites for reducing poverty and making local livelihoods more resilient in the face of rapid economic and ecological change. How can sound arrangements for property rights and collective action be achieved? Applied research for development can help strengthen appropriate institutions, from local to regional scales, and derive lessons that will catalyze institutional and policy change in other areas (Ostrom 2007).The goal of this subtheme is to strengthen appropriate property rights and collective action institutions that contribute to sustainable natural resource management and reduce poverty. Research under this subtheme will engage multistakeholder networks through the CGIAR Systemwide Program on Collective Action and Property Rights (CAPRi) to  increase security of resource tenure for small-scale producers;  enable more effective management of common pool resources and environmental services; and  empower small-scale producers to increase their voice in policy decisions and to gain access to investment and market opportunities. CRP2 researchers will work jointly with multistakeholder networks that articulate a focused demand for learning to influence policy and institutional reform. Empirical research conducted in collaboration with CRPs 1, 5, 6, and 7 will support poverty reduction and sustainable agricultural and natural resource-based livelihoods (in dryland, coastal, aquatic, watersheds, and forested systems, etc). What are effective ways to strengthen the access and tenure security of poor men and women to land, water, trees, and other critical natural resources in the face of increased and globalized competition for resources, particularly in multiuse landscapes?  What combinations of property rights are needed for small-scale producers to improve environmental management, enhance production, and be active participants in value chains?  What community and state actions are needed to secure rights to, and effectively manage, common property (for example, water, rangelands, forests) and environmental services (for example, genetic resource conservation, water and watershed management, pest management, carbon sequestration), especially for smallholders, pastoralists, fishers, indigenous peoples, women, and the poor?  What interventions increase the effectiveness of collective action and its inclusion of women and marginal groups? What measures help reduce gender and other inequalities in accessing, participating, and leading collective action institutions?As resources become scarcer, strategies are needed to minimize conflicts. Yet many programs to formalize property rights have ignored the multiple overlapping uses of resources that are vital to the livelihoods of the poor. This research will go beyond \"ownership\" as defined by state title to consider the entire bundle of rights derived from customary and statutory law. Methods include action research to strengthen the property rights of marginalized groups (for example, indigenous peoples, women); intrahousehold surveys, focus groups, and key informant interviews to identify the strength and impacts of rights held by different actors; and factors that strengthen property rights of marginalized groups. Case studies of large-scale agricultural investments and projects for biofuel development or environmental service payment programs that increase land value will identify ways to ensure that poor people share the benefits rather than lose their resource rights. These case studies will seek innovative tenure measures to secure private, collective, and common property. This research builds on prior CAPRi work on legal pluralism and a set of four case studies on securing access to natural resources, as well as studies of carbon payments and tree tenure conducted under CRPs 6 and 7. CRP2 will carry out new studies on investor pressures and identify cross-cutting lessons.This research examines the interactions between various property rights with productivity and environmental sustainability, considering not only private lands, but also shared land, water, and biological resources and environmental services. Action research and the study of decentralization programs, such as joint forest management or fisheries co-management, will identify what is needed to establish effective organizations at the local level, explore the feasibility and potential outcomes of expanding local authority over natural resources, and determine the necessary state support for such efforts. Studies of programs for payment of environmental services will identify the need for collective action or certain types of property rights among smallholders for participation and how such programs can be more inclusive of the poor. Partnerships between research organizations (CGIAR, agricultural research institutes, and NARSs) and implementing organizations (NGOs and governments) will ensure that research findings are linked to national policies, donor initiatives, and international conventions seeking technical advice. These partnerships will promote the inclusion of local institutional development and secure poor people's access to development policies and programs, and identify how to measure the effectiveness of globally coordinated systems, including indicators that measure benefits delivered to the poor. Although past studies of these issues have been conducted at the local level (through CAPRi and others), new research will address these issues at a broader scale, particularly in the context of growing vulnerability due to climate change.Research to help small-scale producers claim their voice in policy decisions and gain access to markets will include action research involving producer organizations, NGOs, and national and international development programs designed to increase the effectiveness and inclusiveness of collective action. Cross-cutting lessons will be identified through ongoing case studies and new comparisons of the performance of hundreds of groups, meta-analysis, and agent-based modeling (Poteete, Janssen, and Ostrom 2010). New applications of experimental games provide a tool for studying the effect of rule changes on cooperation and for giving feedback to user groups to increase their cooperation. Researchers under CRP2 will work with producer, fisher, and pastoralist organizations in value chains, women's organizations participating in agriculture, and federations engaging in policy advocacy. Activities will coordinate with research conducted by CRPs 1, 5, 6, and 7, as well as CRP2 Theme 3 on collective action for agricultural production and value chains. The research will look at fisheries, rangelands, forests, water, watersheds, genetic resources, and climate change programs, providing methods and research tools; continuing CAPRi's work in learning across different types of groups through conceptual frameworks, methodologies, and meta-analyses; and commissioning new cases to fill critical gaps.The highest-priority research within this subtheme is the expansion of work on property rights and tenure security, which feeds into the current window of opportunity in land tenure reforms, such as FAO's Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries, and Forests and the African Union's Land Policy Initiative. This work will also have a heavy focus on Africa, where customary tenure is most prevalent and most insecure. Within other regions, areas with a high proportion of indigenous people and marginalized groups will receive priority because they are likely to face greatest tenure insecurity. Ongoing and new work under property rights, collective action, and improved management of resources will also receive priority in order to address the institutional underpinnings of payment for environmental services so that they can be scaled up to help poor producers cope with climate change. Funding cuts would mostly affect activities related to collective action and empowerment of small-scale producers, which would be limited to working with and synthesizing studies under other themes and CRPs, without commissioning any new empirical work.Issues of collective action and property rights are relevant wherever people manage natural resources or work together in agriculture, but the emphasis of empirical work will differ by region and agroecological zone. In Africa, interaction between customary and statutory property rights is particularly important, especially in the context of foreign investment in agriculture. In Asia and Latin America, distribution of property rights and access to resources for poor households is relatively more important. Latin America has stronger farmer movements and more gender integration of groups. Postsocialist countries, such as in Central and Southeast Asia, have experienced changes in property rights, and previous forced collectivization has often disrupted voluntary cooperation.The research process to address these issues requires collective action across disciplines and types of organizations. CGIAR researchers work with NARSs to conduct all research, often involving top faculty in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) universities and their students in the field work. Research will be conducted in close collaboration with producer organizations, NGOs, and national and international development programs.Research and outreach will influence the formation and implementation of policies that deal with natural resource access and allocation, especially land tenure policy, at both national and international levels, to strengthen the resource tenure of women, pastoralists, fishers, and secondary resource users. Researchers participate in key networks, including the African Union Land Tenure Initiative, the International Land Coalition, and the Global Land Tools Network. Work on conditions for equitable partnerships between agricultural investors and local land users will link to initiatives by the World Bank, FAO, the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) to develop a code of conduct for agricultural investment. It will contribute to the initiative by the International Land Coalition (ILC), ActionAid, and regional farmers' organizations to widen the dialogue on large-scale land acquisitions and their alternatives. And it will seek to influence private investment trends through corporate social responsibility norms and programs in the area of property rights for the poor.An example of this engaged mode of action research is a CAPRi project led by the WorldFish Center in Cambodia's Tonle Sap (see Box 4.1).Most development programs involve some type of group in managing resources, delivering services, or marketing products, but these programs often do not recognize the collective action and associated institution building necessary for success. Therefore, in addition to working directly with programs to strengthen collective action on the ground and implement decentralization policies, CRP2 researchers will share lessons on how to strengthen inclusive collective action with governments, NGOs, bilateral and multilateral donor agencies, and producer organizations. This subtheme will bring interest groups together across sectoral or institutional boundaries to identify and support innovation and action. Input from government and development agencies, NGOs, and civil society/producer organizations will provide clear demands for analysis and capacity building in support of policy and institutional reform. Partnerships with universities will ensure that research teams learn from the most recent academic findings and that the results of this research strengthen the capacity of a new generation of researchers, who will be encouraged to go into applied research, whether in the academic, public, private, or NGO sectors. These partnerships with universities will target university curriculums, involve students in dissertation research, prepare training materials from research, and offer interdisciplinary training workshops in each region. Links with professional societies, including disciplinary associations, the International Association for the Study of the Commons (IASC), and networks such as the International Land Coalition, will ensure that findings reach broader audiences.The main alternative suppliers of CRP2 on Subtheme 2.3 are the following (in alphabetical order): The partnership joins the key government agency, the leading domestic policy research institute, and the most important grassroots network of small-scale fishers to jointly assess the sources of competition and conflict over fishery resources and identify opportunities for building collective action across sectors to manage such competition equitably. Because all key stakeholders, including community leaders, the police, and local and provincial government officials representing a range of sectoral agencies, are analyzing the problem and exploring options jointly, solutions emerge on the spot. Because the commitments these actors make are reinforced by local mechanisms of social accountability, the action research process is catalyzing institutional change processes. Even before the project has concluded, community fishery representatives are reporting improved enforcement of local regulations that combat destructive fishing and ensure access by the poor to fishing grounds, as well as more effective resolution of tenure disputes with the commercial sector. The civil society network is maturing beyond its former adversarial relationship with government and is empowered with new capacity to work with government in seeking joint solutions. The government's recent halting of all fisheries concessions pending resolution of such issues indicates a willingness on the part of the government to address the identified problems. Workshop on Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University CRP2's comparative advantages with respect to these organizations are the following:  CAPRi's strong reputation for bringing together collective action and property rights research of high caliber  Conceptual frameworks and application of best practice methods  Close collaboration with alternative suppliers  Ability to link theory and research to practical applications  Strong networks with NGOs and policy agencies (governmental and international)to ensure application of research findingsThe research strategy includes exchange among multiple stakeholders to create conditions for implementing policies, laws, and institutional reforms in a manner that serves the interests of poor resource users and marginalized groups. The research will use several impact pathways to ensure that research translates into effective and inclusive collective action and tenure security for people who depend on natural resources for their livelihoods. The most immediate pathway is active engagement with user groups and government or NGO programs to improve capacity for collective action or security of tenure for the poor in the study areas. Researchers will also promote findings from studies and impact assessments of programs to help governments, NGOs, and donor agency partners address collective action in their programs. By feeding research results into discussions on international conventions, CRP2 will promote the inclusion of local institutional development and secure access rights. By articulating corporate social responsibility norms, CRP2 will influence private-sector investment to respect the customary property rights of farmers, herders, fishers, forest-dwellers, and women. Policy briefs, presentations, films, and other outreach materials will be used to share findings with other government, NGO, and donor organizations. Peer-reviewed publications will ensure the quality of research findings and feed these back to universities and NARSs. Multistakeholder networks of which CAPRi is a member-such as the International Land Coalition and the Global Land Tools Network-will provide opportunities for dissemination and uptake of research results and recommendations. This research activity will also develop and document research methods and provide capacity-building materials to ensure that a new generation of applied researchers can apply this research in new areas, creating a multiplier effect. This research will contribute to the greater effectiveness of at least 5,000 collective action groups through direct engagement in action research and results applied by NGOs and government agencies, and to the creation in five to six subregions of robust institutions that link producer organizations and national and regional policy networks to effectively advocate for access rights for millions of resource-dependent people. By using the research results, governments will be better able to create or strengthen policies that provide security of rights to land, water, trees, and fisheries for poor and resource-dependent women and men. These policies will also contribute to achieving other poverty reduction goals, such as increased incomes and greater asset accumulation, reduced vulnerability to risks, including environmental shocks, and improved health and nutrition. Research findings, repackaged as products oriented toward policymakers and practitioners, will contribute to the creation of effective intermediary institutions advocating for the provision of secure rights to resources and highlighting the important role of local institutions, such as producer organizations, water user groups, and civic associations, in helping improve local livelihoods. Case studies and experimental games identifying factors leading to effective collective action groups  Identification of effective ways to strengthen inclusive collective action and coordination for managing natural resources  Studies of large-scale land-based investments to identify ways in which such investments can be made without loss of property rights for women and poor local populations  Identification of effective ways to strengthen property rights to commons and customary rights  Capacity-building materials for producer organizations and NGOs These outputs should be translated into the following outcomes:  Creation or strengthening of intermediary institutions advocating for access rights  Programs to improve tenure security that pay particular attention to the needs of the poor, women, and marginalized groups  Strengthening of associations of women and smallholders for improved voice in decisionmaking and market access  Enhanced capacity of government and NGOs to work with collective action institutions (and vice versa)The contributions of Subtheme 2.3 to achieving impacts and contributing to the SLOs are described in Table 2.1 in Section 2.Raising people's stock of assets has been shown to be a more enduring contributor to reducing poverty than increasing incomes alone. Like income, assets can be converted to cash, but they are also multidimensional. Assets both store wealth and can increase in value; they can act as collateral and facilitate access to credit and financial services; they help deal with unforeseen contingencies and smooth consumption streams. Their flexibility provides security through emergencies and opportunities in periods of growth (Deere and Doss 2006, 1). Increasing ownership of, and control over, assets also helps provide more permanent pathways out of poverty compared with measures that focus on increasing incomes or consumption alone. Sabates-Wheeler's (2006) review of the relationship between ownership and control over tangible assets and agricultural productivity concludes that the combination of asset inequality and market failure has a negative impact on growth and that inequalities tend to reproduce inequalities. Ownership and control of agricultural assets-physical, human, and social capital--is also highly correlated with the adoption of new agricultural technologies, including environmentally sustainable farming practices (Meinzen-Dick et al. 2002;Deininger, Ali, and Yamano 2008;Deininger et al. 2008). Agricultural development projects that seek to increase the asset holdings of poor people not only contribute to sustainable poverty reduction, but also help promote socially desirable and empowering behavior by both individuals and marginalized communities. Asset-based approaches view well-being as a cumulative process, resulting from a lifetime of stored efforts and accrued wealth (Sherraden 1991). Savings and stored wealth (assets) are necessary for the kinds of cushioning and security needed to exit poverty (Carter and Barrett 2006). This is especially true for poor women, who typically have lower levels of ownership and control over assets than men, but whose assets contribute to their empowerment and the education and health of children, reducing the intergenerational transmission of poverty (Quisumbing 2003).Although there is increasing evidence that assets matter for moving out of poverty in the long term, we know less about the role that institutions play in enabling the poor to accumulate assets, protect them from shocks, and transmit these assets to future generations. These institutions include property rights institutions (encompassing customary and statutory laws), social protection institutions (both formal and informal), and inheritance laws. Social and cultural institutions, including gender norms surrounding or concerning asset ownership, as well as political institutions that determine individuals' ability to participate in and benefit from decisionmaking at the local and national levels, are also important. The role and importance of institutions is context-specific. Because institutions are not \"given\" but evolve in response to external factors and internal change processes, it is important for the CGIAR to know how institutions can be made more conducive to reducing hunger and poverty. The argument that attention to assets-as well as to the distribution of those assets within the household-is key to attaining better development outcomes implies a shift in the \"theory of change.\" The conceptual framework underlying this theory of change is found in Meinzen-Dick et al. (2011). The goal of this research is to identify mechanisms and institutions to strengthen the portfolio of those assets that enable the poor to be agents of their own development, to protect those assets from adverse shocks, and to increase their stock of other assets. These assets include natural capital (rights to land, water, trees, livestock, and biodiversity), financial capital (credit, savings), physical capital (especially tools and technologies), human capital (education, health, nutritional status, extension services, knowledge of agricultural environment, and information, including access to and use of information and communication technologies), and social and political capital.CRP2 will work with action research programs under CRPs 1, 4, 5, and 6, which seek to strengthen poor people's assets-including education, health, nutritional status, livestock, water, fisheries, agrobiodiversity, and associated natural resources-to draw out lessons related to the questions above. Because assets are multidimensional and because the relevant institutions that constrain or facilitate asset accumulation are context-specific, mixed-method approaches using quantitative and qualitative techniques will be used in a representative set of countries and regions in order to reach general conclusions.Differences in resource endowments and institutional settings across regions make it imperative to strive for regional balance in the research portfolio. Because gender norms and gender disparities are also quite different across regions, each region may have to develop a specific policy focus, but with comparable methodologies to enable the creation of international public goods. For example, asset poverty traps have been documented only in Sub-Saharan African societies with missing markets, particularly in capital and labor (for example, Carter and Barrett 2006). Evidence for these types of poverty traps has not been found in Asia (see Naschold 2006;Quisumbing and Baulch 2009), possibly because of the existence of wellfunctioning credit and labor markets. A broad question with cross-regional implications would be why the conditions and institutions that give rise to poverty traps are present in one region but not in the other. Another issue would be the different roles that control of assets play in men's and women's livelihoods. In Sub-Saharan Africa, one possible focus might be women's access to and control of assets as agricultural producers and the interaction between customary and statutory law, particularly with respect to land rights. In South Asia, where labor markets are active, the focus might be on the role of assets and access to financial services in enabling women to participate in nonagricultural enterprise and labor markets. The following are selected research questions. What kind of assets do poor men and women hold, how do they acquire them, and what can be done to help them build up and protect their stocks? Which assets, not typically held by poorer people, act as critical constraints to self-improvement in different contexts?  What is the effect of trends such as increases in agricultural productivity and land values, migration, the increased role of the nonagricultural sector in the economy, and the growth of alternative financial service delivery mechanisms (such as microfinance) on poor women's and men's abilities to acquire, protect, and realize returns to assets? What types of human assets have been most critical for poor men and women in increasing the returns to their other assets, and what policies and programs are needed to build and enhance those types of human assets?  What role do different types of assets play in enabling men and women to escape poverty traps, participate in agricultural and nonagricultural growth, and protect their productivity and well-being against shocks? Do the roles of assets in fulfilling these functions differ for men and women and for poor and nonpoor households?  What are the institutional arrangements that contribute most effectively to building the assets of the poor? Of women? What existing or proposed programs or policy reforms have the potential to strengthen the assets of the poor, and reduce gender asset gaps? What institutional arrangements need to be in place to support these programs? How can action research contribute to learning about the appropriate institutional arrangements that support asset accumulation by the poor?Small-scale producers and the poor in general face serious financial constraints and are unable to obtain credit easily. They face difficulty in building their asset base. This research activity will use quantitative techniques (a household survey) and qualitative techniques (participatory assessments, life histories, focus group discussions) to ascertain the assets held by poor men and women in different country and regional contexts. The activity will adopt an inclusive definition of assets (natural, financial, physical, human, social, and political capital) and examine not only the quantities or levels of assets held by men and women, but also their quality, importance, and possible substitutability or complementarity at different stages. CRP2 will econometrically analyze large-scale surveys and panel data, ideally with information on individuals within households, to (1) identify how broader trends and policies (such as migration, rural-urban linkages, the process of structural transformation, and the changing landscape of financial services) affect poor women's and men's abilities to acquire and protect different forms of assets; and (2) study the economic returns and other impacts (for example, empowerment, reduction in vulnerability) of assets held by women and men. Attention will be paid to the legal and political bases for asset ownership and the extent to which property rights regimes and contextual factors (including cultural practices) assist or hamper asset accumulation by the poor (this activity complements Theme 1). Attention will also be paid to the evolution of institutions that support accumulation of different types of assets by the poor--for example, microfinance institutions (the use of social capital, such as group liability, to obtain access to financial capital and thus enable the accumulation of physical capital) or conditional cash transfers programs and school expansion (interventions facilitating the accumulation of human capital). This research will look into regional comparisons between Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, the two areas of the world with the greatest concentration of poor people, which also have very different resource endowments and sociocultural institutions. This component will include continuous panel data collection in key countries in order to analyze the consequences of asset accumulation and disposal for managing food security, risk, and vulnerability.Most analyses of the role of the different types of capital and their relationships to livelihoods strategies have been conducted at the household level. This research will examine the role of assets for different household members in moving out of poverty. It will investigate whether poverty traps exist at the household and individual levels and whether particular individuals are more likely to be trapped in poverty.] Yet, because risk is not shared equally within the household (Goldstein 1999;Dercon and Krishnan 2000;Duflo and Udry 2004), and because men and women may have different perceptions regarding risk (Doss, McPeak, and Barrett 2008), shocks affect men's and women's assets in different ways. In Thailand, women tend to keep more of their individual assets in tangible forms (such as jewelry), because this gives them more control over asset use (Antonopoulos and Floro 2005). Men and women may also use assets in different ways to move out of poverty. In the Philippines, where sons inherit land and daughters are favored in schooling, daughters have been able to acquire nonagricultural jobs, migrate to urban areas, and send remittances to their parents (Quisumbing, Estudillo, and Otsuka 2004); these patterns are different in other countries where men and women hold different types of assets. In Ghana, for example, where returns to schooling in the nonagricultural sector were still low, women's incomes would increase more when they were given equal access to land than when they were sent to school. (Note that new funding would be used to expand country coverage through the collection of new genderdisaggregated datasets, which could also build on impact evaluation work.)Evidence from life histories (see Krishna 2010 on India, Kenya, Peru and Davis 2006 on Bangladesh) suggests that asset accumulation is gradual and incremental, but shocks such as death and illness can lead to a rapid depletion of assets. Both formal and informal safety nets that enable the poor to smooth consumption (publicly provided health insurance; credit, whether formal or informal; credit-cum-insurance schemes; food-for-work) may protect the poor from temporary shocks that could otherwise lead to a permanent depletion of asset stocks. This research activity will examine the range of risk management and insurance mechanisms available to the poor, the extent to which poor men and women avail themselves of such mechanisms, and the effectiveness of such mechanisms in protecting consumption and assets after shocks. These mechanisms will include not only formal social protection mechanisms, but also informal mechanisms (migration and transfers) and local institutions that poor rural communities use to manage their biological assets, such as seeds, seed systems, and other components that contribute to risk reduction and livelihood improvement. Findings will inform the design of social protection mechanisms that enhance the ability to manage risk without displacing indigenous social protection systems.This subtheme will undertake rigorous impact assessments of a range of development interventions and institutional arrangements that seek to strengthen different types of assets or increase the returns to assets held by the poor. It will use a mix of quantitative and qualitative methods. To maximize the effectiveness and uptake of lessons learned from these evaluations, researchers will undertake them jointly with implementing agencies-not just government agencies, but also civil society organizations-and will elicit views from a diverse range of stakeholders. Attempts will be made to choose projects with regional balance, with the priority given to Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Quantitative methods can include randomized allocation of interventions to create randomly assigned control or treatment groups, propensity score matching to construct a counterfactual comparison group, regression discontinuity designs that exploit eligibility criteria to create the counterfactual, or instrumental variables approaches (see Ravallion 2008 for a discussion of program evaluation methods). Qualitative methods will enable evaluators to hear from beneficiaries about the impact of the interventions in their own words, as well as to better understand the processes that underlie the success or failure of the intervention. Data collected in these evaluations will be gender-disaggregated. The evaluation of alternative implementation modalities will be an explicit focus of the research. By involving a range of stakeholders and employing qualitative and quantitative methods, this research will avoid the dichotomy between action research and academic research and will generate knowledge useful for identifying and scaling up programs that help poor people build assets. (Note that funding to assess the gendered impact of agricultural programs on assets has recently been obtained [2010] and can cover impact assessment of eight projects in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia).Given that partial funding for both impact evaluation and data collection (in line with impact evaluation, as well as other projects) has already been obtained for this research program, priority should be given to these newly funded efforts so that activities remain on schedule. If budgets are cut, analytical work on mapping asset portfolios and understanding the context of asset accumulation would be delayed, but the impact evaluation and risk management work would have generated datasets that can be used to undertake this analysis at a later time. Funding would eventually be raised for this cross-cutting analytical work.This research program will involve not only NARs and researchers from developing-country universities, but also government and civil society organizations. Many of the organizations that have undertaken innovative programs to transfer assets to the poor are civil society organizations (for example, the Grameen Bank, BRAC International), and action research programs that pay specific attention to implementation modalities and scaling up will be important to distill the lessons learned from these initiatives. Action research programs can be undertaken in partnership between development institutions and CGIAR research institutions so that rigorous and replicable research designs can be used, which can yield benefits directly to program implementers. Attention to implementation issues and capacity building will help researchers distill lessons beyond the specific program being evaluated. CRP2 researchers will also actively collaborate with networks of researchers and academics in universities in developed countries. For example, CGIAR researchers in this area already work with, and are supported by, collaborative research support programs (CRSPs) funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development, such as the livestock and assets for market access CRSPs, and research networks and universities in the United Kingdom and European Union.The main alternative suppliers of CRP2 on Subtheme 2.4 are the following (in alphabetical order): Outputs of this research will consist of  mixed-methods approaches to improve our understanding of the factors, processes, and institutions that enable poor men and women to accumulate assets, protect them from shocks, and use them to move out of poverty;  a set of country case studies documenting different ways that men and women accumulate assets and use them to move out of poverty, including synthesis and comparative analysis across country case studies;  a set of action research studies or impact evaluations, using mixed-methods approaches, that document the impact of policies and interventions (including changes in institutional arrangements) on assets of the poor and recommend best practices to increase and/or protect assets of the poor; and  gender-disaggregated datasets generated by the project and a set of best practice recommendations for gender-disaggregated data collection.Outcomes of the research will include  the use of asset-based indicators to evaluate project and program impacts on the poor;  use by project implementers of promising approaches and best practices to reduce gender-based constraints affecting the control and ownership of key productive assets in agricultural development programs; and  recognition by research managers, donors, and NGOs of the importance of reducing asset disparities and explicitly targeting them in their programming. Key elements of this subtheme's strategy to ensure translation of outcomes into outputs include (1) working with project implementers to evaluate the impact of their interventions on assets and identifying ways of strengthening the long-run asset accumulation by women and the poor; 14 (2) strengthening the capacity of NARSs and NGOs to undertake such studies themselves;(3) sharing information with key government agencies, donors, and land rights and women's advocacy agencies to document positive outcomes of asset accumulation; and (4) ultimately, working to create a \"paradigm shift\" to give greater attention to long-run strategies of genderequitable asset accumulation. increased assets held by the poor;  reduced asset inequality;  reduced gender asset disparities; and  achievement of better development outcomes related to agricultural productivity, food security, and nutrition as a result of the inclusion of assets as well as income in the development paradigm from an income to an assets focus;  ultimately, poverty will be reduced as the asset base of such groups is strengthened and made more secure against shocks, enabling greater productivity and reduced vulnerability (see Table 2.1).Establishing competitive and efficient markets is a central challenge of achieving economic growth. Among the most severe constraints are those related to costs (such as direct and indirect costs, opportunity costs, transaction costs, and others). The high costs to farmers and other actors of poor infrastructure, lack of information, insufficient credit, and policy distortions reduce the efficiency of value chains and impede producers' ability to connect to market systems. A value chain is the sequence of interlinked agents and markets that transforms inputs and services into products with attributes for which consumers are prepared to pay. Millions of low-income people, a large proportion of whom are women, participate in agricultural value chains as producers, small-scale traders, processors, and retailers. Many millions more, including the great majority of the developing world's poor, participate in value chains as consumers. Improving the performance of value chains therefore stands to benefit large numbers of people (Aramyan, Lansink, and van Kooten 2005;Lohman, Fortuin, and Wouters 2004;Lambert and Pohlen 2001;Beamon 1999). This theme identifies key constraints and opportunities in value chains; evaluates options for upgrading value chains; and provides tools, strategies, and policy approaches for achieving development change that is pro-poor, sustainable, and gender sensitive.Few tools have been developed to design and implement economics-and management-based change within value chains. Moreover, the tools that are in existence suffer from the lack of unifying theory and performance metrics that enable consistent data collection and analysis. Taken together, these conditions mean that value chains have been subject to little consistent and constructive research but offer an excellent platform for research activities and communication of results. This is the opportunity that Theme 3 exploits. Filling this research gap will involve tracing impact pathways via their commercial linkages and developing more advanced economic tools that measure impacts in a consistent way. Value chains research, as proposed here, would broaden the analysis from the farm level to the level of the agricultural and rural sector. The CGIAR and other partners in CRP2, including NARSs, GFAR, and IFAD, have a strong comparative advantage in this research, partly because it combines knowledge of technology and policy, and the value chains theme maximizes complementarity with Themes 1 and 2 and commodity CRPs. GFAR has been mobilizing collective learning and knowledge sharing around experiences and best practices in linking smallholder farmers to markets for a number of years and this theme has strong ownership among regional forums and farmers' organizations alike. The research capabilities of the CRP2 offer the chance to look across learning among regions with an analytical lens and analyze underlying trends, rationales and solutions that could be readily transferrable elsewhere to increase the speed of change and better benefit poor farmers as they struggle to organize for large scale markets.The goal of Theme 3 is to create an overarching theoretical framework to understand and address problems and opportunities in agricultural value chains as they relate to the poor, and to apply this framework to understand and improve the efficiency and access to value chains by small producers. It will target productivity increases and marketing changes that are not only location-and product-specific, but also relevant across products and locations. Theme 3 provides a framework for compiling existing knowledge as a precursor to formulating prototypes for field testing, stimulating learning processes, and disseminating findings with other CRPs and other initiatives. Such initiatives include the GFAR/FAO/CGIAR initiative, Coherence in Information for Agricultural Research for Development (CIARD) initiative, which identifies what works where, for whom, and promotes its dissemination. Targeting of locations and specific chains will be carried out as participatory activities with partners, facilitated where appropriate by other CRPs' activities. Further complementarities to commodity CRPs is provided by CRP2's capacity for analysis across multiple commodities, specifically in key constraint contexts, such as innovations in institutional arrangements (vertical and horizontal coordination), infrastructure, and information flows.Value-chain analysis provides a vital aspect of evidence-based policy advice. This theme provides an understanding through value chains of the market performance portrayed in Theme 1 on prioritization of value chains, policies and investments, households' participation in those markets, the roles played by public and private actors, and the public investments required to upgrade value chains. The governance and institutions of the public and private actors are, in turn, analyzed in Theme 2, by understanding how to structure number of interventions specific to problem and opportunity identification, and three cross-cutting activities featuring gender, extension, and knowledge sharing. This theme's focus on value chains is intended to complement and extend research carried out in the other themes of this CRP and in other CRPs. Research within this theme will  define the value chain for analysis, measure its performance, and evaluate the benefits and costs associated with upgrading options; identify opportunities for smallholders to benefit from rising demand for highvalue commodities and gain access to the available retail structures, including modern retail chains, based on the different policy scenarios simulated in Theme 1; and foster institutional and infrastructure innovations to generate equitable and sustainable benefits-including the mitigation and management of risk-for value-chain actors.Research activities can be described in terms of the location within the value chain and the type of commodity. With respect to the location within the value chain, research activities can be distinguished between those that focus on inputs, including agricultural technology, and those that focus on output markets. With respect to type of commodity, one way to distinguish commodities is high-and low-value crops. Low-value commodities (such as staples) are those that generate a relatively low economic return per unit of land or labor. Markets tend to be insensitive to quality, whereas large market volumes and the poor consumer base magnify sensitivity to price. Key policy research issues concern how to reduce marketing and processing costs to raise producer prices, while ensuring consumer affordability and access. High-value commodities, by contrast, feature quality-sensitive demand, with associated requirements for grading and standards in serving income-responsive markets. Policy research issues include market failure in information flows, capacity building, postharvest action, and market access and response.In both high-and low-value commodity value chains, commodity-specific CRPs address technical issues that will be complemented by CRP2 (see Annex 3). Of particular policy interest is the potential for upgrading value chains through postharvest activities as a way to help women generate value added. Such benefits are associated with chain coordination, particularly linkages with traders, and the research in this theme will identify predisposing factors and optimal intervention strategies. research on innovations to foster opportunities for smallholders across the value chain (Subtheme 3.1) and  research on impact evaluation to measure the costs and benefits of options for upgrading value chains (Subtheme 3.2).As these two subthemes are deeply interrelated, the \"Selected research questions,\" \"Prioritysetting,\" \"Partnerships,\" and \"Outputs, outcomes and impacts\" sections are common to both subthemes.CRP2 will apply a mixed set of methods to identify constraints and opportunities in the value chain and evaluate interventions for improvement. This research will require engaging actors along the value chain and refining existing methods to identify and define performance. To complement Theme 1's examination of alternative objectives in models, CRP2 will examine alternative value-chain performance measures. Moreover, the recognition and measurement of variables associated with innovation, governance, and risk will complement Theme 2's work addressing transactions.Value-chain methodologies have in the past focused on participatory data collection for point estimates of prices. These methodologies are good practice for consulting firms, serve the needs of many commercial actors, and are well supported by handbooks and examples from the World Bank, FAO, the German Agency for Technical Cooperation (GTZ now part of GIZ), and others. CRP2 will use research, rather than consultancy, methods: innovative sampling techniques of mobile market agents such as traders, margin calculation for diversified and seasonally affected producers and traders, definition and measurement of whole-chain performance (by financial and social numéraires), assessment of intrahousehold equity in the context of value addition, power relationships related to defining and achieving standards, and many other measurement issues. The use of these innovative research methods will allow to identify generic measures (for example, on equity issues, or as return on working capital), while also expanding context-specific measures (for example, risk factors associated with delays in cultivation, or in delivery).The value-chain approach allows close examination of issues related to transmission of consumer preferences regarding food safety and quality, impacts of market related policies, incentives to reduce postharvest losses, and risks. Research will draw on existing biophysical and detailed household survey data to estimate the efficiency of local farmers and rural workers given certain conditions such as climate, topology, prices, and their own economic and demographic characteristics, using a stochastic profit frontier.Contact with value-chain agents will necessarily be participatory, and a major challenge faced by past research has been quantification of this qualitative research for rigorous analysis. Methods applied in CRP2 will therefore complement other CRPs' work, suggesting variables to observe and means to measure them, and feeding back benchmarked values of performance. Participatory approaches will support a key objective by creating the awareness, capacity, and opportunities for farmers to become more positive, informed actors in the market chain. They will also provide an unprecedented opportunity to address gender-related issues and ensure increased empowerment and equity for female farmers and other women through increased participation in the value chain. CRP2 will collaborate in this regard with the emerging global Gender in Agriculture Partnership (GAP) spearheaded by GFAR, FAO, Agropolis-Foundation and AWARD with support from United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the CGIAR Consortium.To further exploit opportunities posed by current commercial momentum, researchers will use randomized and quasi-experimental interventions to examine the value-chain role of improving access to market information using mobile phones and other information and communication technologies. They will identify sustainable delivery systems for training and certification related to value chains, and they will examine mechanisms to promote formal and informal business networks (such as lead farmers and trader-driven networks) to optimize potential knowledge spillovers. Cost-benefit analysis will be used to compare the cost of quality assurance systems to farmers, traders, or processors with the benefits accruing to farmers and consumers.Value-chain studies of input distribution systems will evaluate the effects of market imperfections and policy interventions (for example, subsidies) on input distributors. They will identify ways to improve access to inputs and reduce farm-level costs, particularly by studying internal chain arrangements and assessing the impact of different marketing policy interventions on the behavior of traders and processors. For this work, researchers will use state-of-the-art behavioral economics techniques. Finally, agriculture-sector models will be used to evaluate the impact of interventions on production, consumption, prices, and trade in agricultural markets. Stochastic simulation models will be used to study the impact of alternative policies to stabilize prices and farm income. power and tacit collusion among firms. According to Integer Research, leading fertilizer producers have achieved record profits in recent years (with total revenues over US$50 billion). Market power exertion may allow firms to fully transmit price spikes in raw materials (for example, natural gas for the production of ammonia) to fertilizer prices and to take advantage of any increase in grain prices by also raising fertilizer prices. A time-series analysis will be used. To evaluate tacit collusion, researchers would track leading fertilizer producers and their range of operation in order to uncover potential pricing patterns among them. The second objective of this activity is to examine the structure of supply chains in specific developing countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, and South Asia with different characteristics (for example, net importers or exporters, coastal or inland, featuring high or low levels of government intervention, and with different size markets). Researchers will analyze procurement and distribution costs and market margins at the production, import, wholesale, and retail levels to examine price differences between markets within a country (whenever possible) and between countries within a region. They will identify the components of the supply system in each country and collect cost and price data through visits, interviews, and surveys of different market participants. This analysis for some key countries will help identify factors-beyond market power exerted at the global level-that drive prices up in particular developing regions and reduce their fertilizer intensity use. Countries using small quantities of fertilizers are expected to pay higher prices for the product because of economies of scale, but other factors at the country level might influence prices, such as a lack of competition among suppliers and distributors, a poor dealer network, high transportation costs, and the cost of finance.This research activity will also examine the impact of alternative marketing policies. The performance of agricultural value chains is strongly influenced by agricultural policies, particularly marketing policies. Although direct government participation in agricultural processing and marketing has declined since the 1980s, many governments continue to intervene in markets for selected inputs and crops. In response to the global food crisis, numerous countries have reintroduced fertilizer subsidies, expanded food security stocks, and increased efforts to stabilize food prices, including some protectionist measures. The crisis has renewed interest in staple food self-sufficiency to insulate domestic food prices from the uncertainty and volatility of world markets. Research is needed to determine whether these policies are meeting their stated goals and how they affect different types of farmers and consumers. This activity will involve applied research, using a range of methods (as noted above), on key policy issues such as fertilizer or other subsidies and other aspects of marketing policy. The research outputs will be country-and global-level guidance on the effects of marketing policy interventions on agricultural markets (production, consumption, trade, and prices), as well as the distributional impacts on different types of households. The guidance will contribute to more well-informed marketing policies, leading to a more efficient and pro-poor marketing system.An important aspect of this research activity relates to high-value agriculture and value-added activities. Income growth and urbanization in developing countries are contributing to the transformation of diets in which consumers are shifting from basic grains and other staple foods toward high-value commodities, including animal products, fish, fruits, and vegetables. At the same time, international trade and foreign direct investment are creating opportunities for farmers in developing countries to take advantages of the demand for high-value agricultural commodities in other countries. Finally, the modernization of the food industry, including the rise of supermarkets, large processors, and exporters is changing the nature of agricultural supply chains. The effect of these transformations of agricultural supply chains on small-scale farmers in developing countries is mixed and requires a systematic assessment. One of the main challenges in seeking greater public investment in agricultural research and extension in high-value agricultural commodities is the perception that staple food self-sufficiency is necessary to achieve food security. In addition, there is a perception that high-value commodities are grown mainly by better-off farmers, so that improving horticultural markets, for example, will not contribute to reduction in rural poverty (Reardon and Timmer 2007). Analysis of existing data can be used to challenge and test these assumptions. Based on experience in some countries, it seems likely that (1) farmers who have a diversified mix of rice and high-value crops can achieve a higher level of food security than those who seek rice self-sufficiency, (2) high-value crops can make a significant contribution to the income of poor rural households, and (3) diversification into high-value agriculture contributes to rural income growth and poverty reduction. If these hypotheses can be confirmed in systematic research across countries, it will assist the advocacy efforts to increase public investment in high-value agriculture. The challenge of this research activity is to test these assumptions and to identify the policies, regulatory environment, public investments, and institutional innovations that will ensure that these transformations have a pro-poor impact.Another important component of this research activity will be to investigate farmers' information needs and mechanisms to supply it. Much of the value added in agricultural marketing depends on the processing of information-for example, about the availability, location, and prices of products on farms and in markets and about what product attributes consumers value. Information is subject to market failure in that it is difficult to sell (the buyer does not know its value until after it is \"purchased\") and easy to reproduce (making it hard for the \"producer\" to recover costs). One policy research question concerns private-sector underprovision of information and the government's role in providing directly information or promoting more provision of information by the private sector. In the value-chain context, information flows enable value-chain actors to add value through branding and certification schemes, for which many examples exist but no repository of developing-country-relevant knowledge is yet available (Torero and von Braun 2006;Aker 2008;Goyal 2010;Jensen 2007). This research activity will provide that knowledge and engage partners in producing and testing prototypes for application across a range of applications. As such, it will complement the CIARD initiative and the global platform on linking farmers to markets being established through GFAR and provide an internationally relevant research methodology and set of analytical principles that can be used in support of all sectors.This research activity will bring three major opportunities: (1) improving the flow of information in value chains in different countries across regions through the implementation of market information systems (we estimate that the project could reduce marketing margins between 2.5 and 5 percent, reducing the incidence of poverty in 2 to 3 percentage points for almost 2 million people affected by the project); (2) identifying the best practices in designing and implementing pro-poor market information systems and disseminating these recommendations; (3) designing and scaling up a framework for proposed information and communication technology interventions. Within each selected country, the project will identify the regions of intervention based on an index combining the following four criteria:(1) market potential (revealed comparative advantage); (2) high rate of poverty; (3) accessibility to major markets; and (4) level of information and communication technology development in rural areas. This selection framework will allow us to estimate the potential impact of scaling up the intervention to the entire country or to other countries based on the four dimensions specified. Researchers will identify and promote methods for generating, delivering, and transmitting information such as prices (outputs and inputs), standards, and cross value-chain production innovations and solutions. Activities will include randomized and quasi-experimental interventions to improve access to market information using mobile phones and other information and communication technologies; the identification of sustainable delivery systems for training, certification, and promotion new technologies and inputs; and the identification of mechanisms to promote formal and informal business networks (lead farmers, trader-driven, and so on) to optimize potential spillovers. This research will have a direct effect on poverty in the areas where it carries out interventions because improved market information will reduce marketing margins, increase farmgate prices, and boost the incomes of rural households. The key outputs will be (1) characterization of the key information needs of each actor in the value chain; (2) a database of existing management information systems and the information included in them; (3) a set of best practices in designing and implementing market information systems that maximize pro-poor impact; and (4) detailed plans for scaling up the proposed ICT interventions (produced together with our NGO implementation partners).Recognizing that marketing infrastructure strongly affects the cost of getting agricultural commodities from the farmer to the consumer, as well as the degree of competition at each stage in the value chain, this analysis will improve knowledge about the impact that complementary investments in rural infrastructure (water, sewerage, roads, electricity, and telecommunications) and postharvest infrastructure (storage facilities, processing equipment for home and market, market facilities, certification, and sanitation facilities, and so on) may have on market development, reduction of postharvest losses, and poverty reduction. It will identify investments with the largest multiplier effects; design institutional strategies that provide adequate access to the public infrastructure necessary to enhance the environment for private sector activity; and identify infrastructure investment opportunities across the food value chain that generate the largest multiplier effects and attract public and private ruralsector investments. Researchers will consider how to raise the private and social profitability of executed investments and identify which bottlenecks (physical or institutional) impede the attainment of maximum potential investment potential in rural infrastructure. The key outputs of this research will be (1) a systematic review of existing information on infrastructure provision best practices (this review will consider not only hard infrastructure, but also postharvest infrastructure, freight capacity, airport capacity, and sanitary and phytosanitary facilities); (2) research that overlaps development domains with economic corridors identified for infrastructure development (particularly for Sub-Saharan Africa) to increase the economic return of infrastructure investments; (3) identification of a framework for prioritizing infrastructure investment, taking into account development domains; (4) identification of ways to forge public-private partnerships based on competitive funds best practices (as the telecommunication and electricity rural funds) as a way to minimize the use of public resources ; (5) measurements of the gains in coordination of different types of infrastructure investments; and (6) identification of best practices in infrastructure provision through solid impact evaluation.Finally, this research activity will also address standards/certification. Quality assurance systems are mechanisms for verifying to consumers the quality, food safety, or production methods of food products, while providing signals to farmers regarding production practices that will be rewarded in the marketplace. Examples are grades, standards, and certification systems, including those organized by private firms, associations, and public agencies. Quality assurance systems are particularly important for perishable high-value commodities, where they are usually organized by private firms or associations. They are also relevant to low-value staple crops, where both public and private systems exist. For example, grades for food grains facilitate long-distance trade and can eliminate the need to inspect lots personally before purchase. The rise of quality assurance systems raises a number of important research questions: How and under what circumstances can quality assurance systems help small-scale farmers (particularly women and the poor) get access to new markets? What are the lessons from established quality assurance systems? What is the appropriate mix of standards, grades, and labeling that will improve product quality and farm income without unnecessarily restricting the market? What methods can firms, associations, and public agencies use to evaluate the usefulness of a quality assurance system ex ante? The outputs of this research will be (1) recommendations regarding the feasibility of quality assurance systems for specific commodities in specific countries; (2) guidelines regarding the situations in which grades, standards, or certification systems are likely to be successful; and (3) best-practice guidelines concerning the design of effective quality assurance systems, including the appropriate combination of grades and standards, the conditions under which certification is best provided by a thirdparty company, an association of producers, and a government agency. The audience for this research includes private firms, associations, and public regulatory agencies. Finally, the development impact of this research will be to create new opportunities for small-scale farmers to tap into growing markets for quality-sensitive, high-value foods and to facilitate a better match between agricultural supply and demand.This research activity will focus on organizations to improve vertical and horizontal coordination. Poor, rural farmers are often left out of the market. They may not be able to compete with larger farmers who can provide firms with consistent quantities of high-quality products. These barriers to entry for small farms may be due to the fact that they cannot exploit economies-of-scale in production. Farmer associations and other ways of collective action can help to address this problem in production and marketing, contracting, and other interventions, such as quality assurance. However, these elements of market entry have not been assembled in a chain-relevant package that is widely applicable to collective action (for example, Minot and Roy 2006;Coulter, Goodland, and Tallontire 1999;Wibonpoongse et al. 1998;Boselie, Henson, and Weatherspoon 2003;Delgado, Narrod, and Tiongco 2003;Dolan and Humphrey 2000). While Theme 2 provides guidance on designing organizations to achieve pro-poor collective action, this theme formulates value addition interventions that use vertical integration and collective action to correct scale-and capacity-related market failures.The related field research tests and validates innovative marketing arrangements (including contracts) to solve the problems of barriers to market entry faced by small farmers, particularly those growing high-value crops across different regions and countries. This research will (1) undertake randomized and quasi-experimental interventions to improve market access through contract farming, outgrowing schemes, or a combination of horizontal and vertical coordination; (2) evaluate methods and tools for improving development interventions that build the business capacities of farmer association; (3) seek to understand the costs and benefits of organizational models, identifying best practices; (4) evaluate alternative incentives for improving or learning from collective models (cooperatives, producer associations, and other farmer groups); ( 5) evaluate vertical and horizontal arrangements relative to other institutional designs, such as farmers' becoming shareholders in for-profit firms; and (6) evaluate the role of women, youth, and excluded populations in horizontal and vertical coordination arrangements and the potential for members of these groups to serve as enterprise leaders.Outputs from this research will help design new institutional mechanisms that give smallholders access to dynamic markets through efficient contract farming arrangements, horizontal coordination arrangements, and improved business capacity, improving the welfare of the poor. Consequently, in addition to scholarly contributions to the topic, we will target policymakers in ministries of agriculture, development practitioners in NGOs, and key private-sector buyers, among others, through forums and policy-relevant bulletins. CRP2 researchers will develop series of documents on optimal strategies for contract farming arrangements, horizontal coordination, and business capacity development, including policies and strategies that institutions can use to improve market access for smallholders. The ultimate beneficiaries of the research project are poor, rural men and women who will have better access to dynamic markets. It is anticipated that the tested mechanisms will be replicable elsewhere in Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and Latin America and will be able to be expanded to different crops, including those used for biofuels.Another important aspect of this research will be developing willing buyers through improved private-sector business practices. Research in the CGIAR typically focuses on increasing farm productivity to leverage improved livelihoods for smallholder farmers and their families. A value-chain approach encompasses additional actors and opens an additional area of inquiry, recognizing that many of the organizational and institutional rules that constrain or permit rural poverty reduction are not formulated at the farm level but rather by private actors. The previous themes have focused on building farmer capacity to become good partners for business and on providing an enabling environment to achieve solid linkages. This theme, in contrast, focuses on providing information and inputs to privatesector firms to influence them to adopt pro-poor business practices to support successful market linkages for smallholders. The rationale behind this theme is the increasing importance of organizational and institutional decision-making by firms, often well removed from the reality of smallholder agriculture in the developing world. As market chains formalize into more modern configurations, firms choose to implement private standards and higher-value differentiated products become more relevant. As a consequence, the decisionmaking nexus and power shifts toward the buyer's end of the chain. Unfortunately this power shift often occurs in an information vacuum in which buyers may make decisions that have unintended negative effects on smallholders in these value chains. Despite the often negative consequences of this shift, previous work by CIAT 16 and CIP (such as the \"Papa Andina\" platforms) has shown that targeted research can influence private sector decisions in a way that supports rather than undermines the position of smallholders. The opportunity, therefore, is to identify effective mechanisms that firms can apply or adapt to help include smallholder farmers in value chains with special emphasis in agricultural products important for the poor.The principle objective of this research is to identify cross-cutting principles that underpin sustained business linkages between smallholder farmers and buyers, thereby contributing to rural poverty reduction for women and men. We will conduct comparative case studies using both qualitative and quantitative methods to examine issues such as chain-wide collaboration and innovation, social intermediary models, fair and transparent governance, risk and cost sharing, and access to services as they pertain to lead-firm business models. This research will be conducted with private-sector firms, international NGOs, and multistakeholder forums, such as the Sustainable Food Laboratory, Sustainable Agriculture Initiative Platform, and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, among others. Outputs from this theme will include (1) a regional series of in-depth case studies of successful and failed attempts at building links between smallholders and large buyers that evaluate the impact of business mode changes on household outcomes in terms of smallholder livelihoods; (2) regional and global comparative analysis to identify key principles for effective linkages and to evaluate the impact of changes in private sector practices on poor women and men; (3) a toolkit to design and consistently measure the outcomes from improved business practices on smallholder livelihoods in a genderdifferentiated manner; (4) scholarly and applied publications on inclusive design principles and evaluation methods and tools; and (5) continued participation and engagement in multistakeholder forums to ensure a clear linkage between research demands and end users.This research activity will explore access to two key financial services--financial markets and insurance mechanisms--for the different players in the value chain. It is well known that access to financial services is important but often inhibited by imperfections in the credit markets. In low-income rural areas, contracts are difficult to enforce and the problem of adverse selection is acute. Banks face high risks and lend conservatively. They lack appropriate, well-developed, and suitably designed credit-scoring models that can help identify suitable borrowers and significant asymmetries of information. Research on access to financial markets will study institutional designs that can reduce the problems of adverse selection and lack of collateral. Such designs might include, for example, a certified warehouse receipt system for staple crops; innovative contract farming arrangements; and a credit-scoring system for rural lending. Absence of a well-developed credit-scoring system both restricts access to credit and prevents the growth of differentiated borrowing options (for example, a menu of choices involving interest rates, loan terms, and loan amounts).Researchers will also investigate three approaches designed to overcome weaknesses of current market-based insurance products that have been hypothesized to explain low pick up rates of the existing insurance mechanisms, as follows: Reducing the complexity of insurance products offered. Many of the weatherbased index insurance products currently offered are complex, and some observers suspect that low take-up rates may result in part from farmers' limited understanding of the products (see in particular the results from Malawi presented in Gine and Yang 2007 in which take-up rates for uninsured loans were higher than take-up rates for insured loans). Increasing demand for these new products may require designing a simpler version, even if it results in more basis risk for an individual farmer. Researchers will analyze the potential success of fairly simple mechanisms that can closely replicate a standard lottery. Our hypothesis is that a simple, more familiar mechanism will result in a faster learning process for farmers and therefore a faster adoption rate. Research on the specific design of the proposed lottery-insurance mechanism will be undertaken--in particular, analysis of indicators that will guide the underlying lottery. The definition of \"losing\" and \"winning\" events must be clearly identified based on indicators highly correlated to the source of risk one wants to insurance against. Experiences with weatherbased index insurance schemes in developing countries will be analyzed to draw lessons  Designing mutual savings products as opposed to insurance products. Throughout Sub-Saharan Africa informal insurance arrangements closely resemble mutual savings arrangements. The concept of insurance offered through these arrangements is quite different from the concept of insurance offered in marketbased schemes. A disconnect between the types of insurance currently understood and used and the types of insurance offered by the market, may explain disappointing take-up rates. Researchers will examine whether offering a mutual savings product may encourage a higher rate of adoption. Providing insurance through a trusted intermediary. Entering into an insurance contract requires trust that the other party has correctly portrayed and explained the terms of the contract and that they will honor the terms of the contract in case a claim is made. Improving the level of trust in the provider of insurance may improve the take-up rate, particularly if insurance can be provided to individuals by groups that already currently insure them. Offering weather insurance through traditional insurance networks builds on the knowledge of insurance provision these groups already have. In addition, providing insurance through groups may reduce the cost of insurance and helps ensures that the new forms of insurance provided do not weaken these groups that are already effective at dealing with some types of risk. The key outputs of this research activity will be the development of innovative mechanisms to improve smallholders' access to credit and insurance.The main alternative suppliers of CRP2 on Subtheme 3.1 are the following (in alphabetical order): This research activity will prepare a comprehensive strategy for evaluating and assessing the impact of different interventions in upgrading value chains under Subtheme 3.1 and across different CRPs. It will identify appropriate indicators and a combination of methods to monitor the performance of different projects, evaluate their effectiveness, and assess their impact on the poor and other target groups, including women. The strategy will describe indicators and methods best suited to the needs of the different interventions on science and technology (CRP1), productivity (CRP3), market access (CRP2), and nutritious content in value chains (CRP4). The design of the methodology will draw on partners experienced in designing and implementing qualitative and quantitative impact evaluation, in designing and using monitoring systems, and in validating different measurement tools for different purposes.This subtheme will  develop sets of indicators to monitor and evaluate the impact of the full range of interventions across CRPs in upgrading value chains; design cost-effective yet rigorous methods for measuring the impact of different types of interventions on the selected indicators; and implement impact evaluations and document best practices and feed them into knowledge clearinghouse in coordination with existing initiatives.The first step will be to identify the impact pathway of the intervention, defined as the expected causal chain of events leading from project activities to outputs to changes in the target population to the achievement of project objectives. For example, a project to assist agro-input dealers may be based on the following sequence of events: the money is allocated, training and credit are provided to agro-input dealers, the dealers sell more fertilizer (especially to women and poor farmers), farmers apply more fertilizer on their crops, and the farmers get better yields, which leads to higher income and reduced poverty.One or more indicators should be selected for each of the main steps along the impact pathway. In this way, the indicators may serve as a diagnostic tool, identifying the place in the impact pathway where the chain was broken. For example, if indicators reveal that agro-input dealers are getting credit and training but they are not able to expand sales or only increase sales to men or better-off farmers, then the project team may want to revise the training or examine other constraints to fertilizer sales. In contrast, if sales are increasing but yields are not responding, the project team may want to reexamine its fertilizer recommendations.Two types of indicators will be developed: 1. Process indicators to measure the inputs and outputs of the intervention itself. These indicators would include the number and distribution of farmers trained or the amount of credit provided. Because they can be easily and inexpensively collected, they can be monitored on a continual basis. Examples include the value of plant breeding, the number of agro-input dealers trained, the area under new micro-irrigation schemes, and the number of modern-input packages delivered to farmers, disaggregated by gender of farmer recipients. 2. Impact indicators, which refer to the range of effects of the project on the intended beneficiaries. Impact indicators are usually collected through household or business surveys. Because these surveys are more expensive and time-consuming, and because impact often takes time to achieve, impact indicators are usually collected less frequently than other indicators. Intermediate impact indicators include the share of farmers using improved seed varieties, the number of farmers able to obtain fertilizers, and average yields for staple crops. They will vary according to the project to be evaluated. Final impact indicators might include the incidence of poverty, the proportion of farmers that experience hunger periods during the year, and the nutritional status of children.Researchers will include gender-disaggregated data wherever possible, both to assess the effectiveness of programs and to strengthen the availability of information on the extent of the gap in assets and services between men and women. Two common measures of problems in targeting are the rate of undercoverage (the proportion of the target group that does not benefit) and leakage (the proportion of beneficiaries that are not in the target group). Indicators also vary according to the level of aggregation.Finally, the impact evaluation will be designed using different methods according to the specific type of intervention. Value-chain interventions pose particular challenges to impact evaluation techniques, so we propose using both qualitative and quantitative techniques to address this problem. To effective evaluate the impact of value-chain interventions, researchers will integrate qualitative and quantitative methods and use operational research methods (for process evaluation and monitoring). They will also use experimental and quasi-experimental approaches for impact evaluation, as well as innovative sampling techniques across the value chain. They will build appropriate counterfactuals to address issues related to (1) confounding factors, and (2) selection biases (Habicht, Victora, and Vaughan 1997). In our view, the use of mixed methods in monitoring and evaluation is necessary not only for the triangulation of findings, but also for achieving a thorough understanding of the different design, operational, or contextual factors that may have fostered or hindered the achievement of expected impacts. This need will imply significant innovation in the designs and techniques used.The main alternative suppliers of CRP2 on Subtheme 3.2 are the following (in alphabetical order):  It brings together a unifying theory and performance metrics that enable consistent data collection and analysis.  It brings together state-of-the-art tools on impact evaluation to identify best practices in upgrading value chains across different commodities.  It offers a unique platform for research activities and communication of results.Theme 3 features a core set of interrelated activities that might receive priority, although it could also be assigned to \"low-hanging fruit\" opportunities or to problems of evident and persistent magnitude. Engaging all three criteria, the research program has identified the following priority areas for Theme 3: Core input to other CRP activities: work on transaction costs and infrastructure and on risk in the value chain; \"Low-hanging fruit\": development of a knowledge clearinghouse and of research methodologies surrounding value-chain performance, both of which would be addressed in partnership with extension services; and  Evident problems: improved market access through partnerships and research on input provision.Efforts devoted to reducing rural poverty have traditionally focused on small-scale farmers trying to increase their competitiveness within the market chain by augmenting productivity through new technologies and organizational strengthening. Despite these efforts, some challenges cannot be overcome through a farmer level approach alone. The market chain encompasses diverse actors ranging from smallscale producers to modern supermarket chains or restaurants, including wholesalers and processors. These actors live in distinct geographical areas and cultural settings, and sometimes have never met or have only informal relationships characterized by lack of trust and strong competition. They lack the capacity to identify common interests and joint opportunities, and to innovate to overcome hurdles at different levels of the market chain. For innovation to occur, new patterns of interaction and new institutional arrangements among the diversity of actors involved in the value chain are necessary. These interactions and arrangements need to focus on adapting scientific expertise to the local context, paying special attention to the socioeconomic, environmental, technological, and market-driven dimensions, while ensuring strong linkages to policy development and incorporating public-private partnerships. CRP2 recognizes the significant potential for drawing on existing work that addresses the developed world's food systems, and which has analyzed and presented the achievements of transition and rapidly advancing economies. The creation of a knowledge clearinghouse, in combination with Theme 1's Strategic Foresight Platform, will catalyze this exchange of experience and bring a range of new partners to the value-chain research, including the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-Pal) from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, University College London, and the International Growth Center with Oxford University and the London School of Economics. The key partner types for the markets and value-chain research include  public, private, local, and international development agencies and the farmer associations they support; 17  national and multinational private-sector firms that purchase goods from the rural poor; 18  national and subnational public-sector agencies that set the rules of the game and decide on infrastructure investments; 19 and  key public and private donor agencies and investment funds, which fund the above. 20 The use of learning alliances will be a key mechanism for developing successful partnerships. Learning cycles provide opportunities to promote interaction, social learning, social capital formation, and collective activities with partners from the private sector, development NGOs, public-sector agencies, Southern and Northern research centers, other CRPs, and donor spheres. CRP3 will have its own commodity-specific learning alliances that will interact with the CRP2 regional learning platforms, providing feedback on technological, market and organizational innovations and contributing to the development of policies and approaches for effective public-private partnerships.The strategy will build on experiences of existing partnerships in different commodities. Over the years, the centers have invested both direct funding and human resources into different forms of partnerships. Good examples of partnership found in CRP3-RTB include Banana Regional R4D Networks (global), the Sweetpotato for Profit and Health Initiative-SPHI (Sub-Saharan Africa [SSA]) and the Latin American and Caribbean Consortium to Support Cassava Research and Development. In relation to staple crops, IFPRI, IRRI, CIMMYT, and ILRI all participate in CSISA in collaboration with the NARSs of South Asia; private crop-science, seed, and agricultural input companies; farmers' organizations, and NGOs. This partnership seeks to prioritize value-chain development in the context of inputs, technologies, and resource-management systems, and aims to decrease hunger and malnutrition, and increase food security among resource-poor, small-scale farm families in South Asia. IFPRI also partners with COMESA to conduct a series of policy seminars and training courses on various topics related to staple food marketing in the region, in addition the value-chain theme will be directly linked to CAADP Pillar 2, which focuses on value chains for SSA.Various partnerships also promote linkages between farmers and high-value markets. This would include the University of Bonn's Foodnet efforts toward supply-chain excellence, Monash University's Centre for Retail Studies, and a host of others spanning promotion of contracting to the establishment of high-value direct sales to the consumer. Similarly, the research theme will continue partnerships with the Mathematics, Computing, and Technology Faculty of Open University and with University College London and Wageningen University. The International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) partners with IFAD's Latin America and Caribbean Division to develop systematic ways for IFAD, as a donor agency, to support market linkage programs between private-sector enterprises and smallholder farmers in innovative and effective ways. IFPRI also has partnerships with IFAD and with the World Food Program 17 Their role is to co-develop methods and approaches in collaboration with the CGIAR to build the capacities/access to infrastructure of poor farmer associations to function as effective and attractive business partners in ways that contribute to reducing poverty. 18 Their role is to co-develop methods and approaches in collaboration with the CGIAR that develop and move more inclusive private-sector policies (purchasing, payment, grading, and so on) toward the mainstream of national and multinational business practice. 19 Their role is to co-develop methods, approaches, and good practices in collaboration with the CGIAR to identify and implement efficient investments in critical social and productive infrastructure that benefits the rural poor. 20 Their role is to co-develop methods and approaches in collaboration with the CGIAR that are more effective at promoting equitable and sustained economic and social growth for the rural poor.(WFP) in linking farmers to markets (in the case of WFP, the key partnership will be with the Purchase for Progress program). In addition, IFPRI partners with the University of Adelaide, the Indonesian Center for Agriculture and Socioeconomic Policy, and the Indonesian Center for Agricultural Policy and Agribusiness Studies to evaluate horticultural value chains in Indonesia. In partnership with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Bank, FAO, and the National Bureaus of Statistics and Livestock Line Ministries, ILRI has created a large-scale project involving piloting improvements to the database for livestock production and marketing systems in Mali, Tanzania, and Uganda.Many of these partnerships focus on capacity-building around the world. IFPRI partners with the Regional Unit of Technical Assistance of Central America (RUTA), with the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa), the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (CEPAL), and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). CIAT also participates in the Sustainable Food Laboratory, which is a coalition of private companies and international NGOs that focuses on increasing the sustainability of the global food system in themes related to smallholder inclusion, social equity, and rural development.In addition to the outputs described at the research activity level, Theme 3 will establish a web-based information and knowledge clearinghouse. This clearinghouse will serve as a fully-accessible repository linked to the GFAR/CIARD portal for all the existing and future products developed through the markets theme of CRP2 for use by other CRPs working on global and local market issues impacting on smallholders (that is, CRP1, CRP3, CRP4, and others), as well as the broader research and development audience. The ethos of the clearinghouse will be that of \"Creative Commons\" (in contrast to materials under \"copyright\"), where all products are made available as quickly and widely as possible under the stipulation that authorship be respected although changes can be made and shared. Specific products in the clearinghouse will include  a common toolbox of methods for use by other CRPs or other research and development partners built around CRP2 prototypes;  best practices from CRP2 and components of other CRPs focused on markets;  quality and attribution methods and tools, which will be provided through the impact evaluation activities of Subtheme 3.2; and  results from quality and attribution testing under diverse crop, market, and policy conditions and cross-cutting analysis. These research results will provide the analytical base and country-level capacities to provide smallholders with access to dynamic markets. The key research outputs will be  tools to optimize and prioritize investment in institutional arrangements and valuechain infrastructure;  best new practices to upgrade value chains across CRPs and through institutional innovations on CRP2, increasing the adoption of best practices through the knowledge clearinghouse and collaborative partnerships; and  identification of policies for creating an environment for willing buyers and the enabling sustainable linkages between capable farmers and willing buyers. Key outcomes will be  improving access to markets for smallholders at better prices and with lower transaction costs; and  upgrading value-chain governance and equity.These research outcomes will have a direct impact on equity and poverty because improved market access, technical innovation, information, and improved efficiency will reduce marketing margins, increasing farmgate prices, expanding labor opportunities for women and the landless, and boosting the incomes of rural women and men. In addition, the research will reduce the risk to farmers through the promotion of risk coping mechanisms, and increase the quality of produce, thereby improving food security. Working with partner organizations that complement the strengths of the CGIAR centers and that focus more on the implementation of the proposed innovations is a key aspect of this theme's strategy for ensuring uptake of outputs. We will promote collaboration with ministries and other public-sector agencies to take into account political and administrative constraints in valuechain recommendations, and to ensure buy-in of the results. Cooperation with NGOs with a strong field presence will be useful in understanding farm-level problems and mobilizing participation to solve them. Working with local universities and research institutes will enable us to draw on local expertise, as well as to develop local capacity to undertake policy-relevant research on agricultural value chains. By design, the evaluation component of Theme 3 (Subtheme 3.2) directly contributes to ensuring that outputs are translated into outcomes and impacts.Farmers and other rural actors are not a homogeneous group. In the developing world, their access to resources and their abilities to initiate and expand agriculture-related businesses are frequently shaped by access to resources according to their gender roles and responsibilities. Neither opportunities nor risks are shared equally within the household (see Subtheme 2.3); men and women may have different perceptions of risks, such that both entrepreneurial efforts and shocks can affect men's and women's welfare in different ways. Furthermore, there is a growing body of evidence that increasing the resources under women's control is likely to increase their bargaining power and improve their children's nutrition and health. Accordingly, for the CGIAR to deliver on its mission-achieving sustainable and positive change for those who need it most-its approaches to agricultural research and development must engage, empower, and invest in women, not only to correct gender inequities, but also to achieve more effective development.This has been widely recognized as a critical and high return, issue to address in agriculture and rural development, most recently in the FAO 2011 State of Food and Agriculture report and the GCARD 2010 Conference and subsequent agreed GCARD Roadmap. Following the GCARD 2010, extensive discussions have continued, through the collaborative mechanism of the Global Forum on Agricultural Research, between the CGIAR, FAO and GFAR's other constituent forums, institutions and networks. The outcome is now an initial agreement to pursue a collective global partnership among these institutions to address (1) strengthening the role of women in agricultural research for development institutions and (2) a more effective gender-based focus on agricultural research prioritization and delivery to better meet the particular innovation needs of women farmers. We will continue to work with GFAR and the regional agricultural research organizations, as well as individual NARS institutions, to promote appropriate attention to gender in agricultural research and extension, and contribute materials for capacity strengthening on gender-responsive agricultural research.CRP2 will ensure that gender issues are not only integrated into preexisting research programs, but also that critical gender issues become a focus of R&D in their own right. In CRP2, experiences with gender analysis under individual projects will be collected, compared, and contrasted to uncover broader lessons on gender integration in its research.An overarching aspect of the three themes of CRP2 will be addressing constraints to collecting and analyzing gender-disaggregated data so that they can be used in all aspects of agricultural policy research. In some cases, no data have been collected, or data are incomplete or inconsistent. In other cases, where gender-disaggregated data are available, they have not been adequately analyzed to identify key gender relations and their influence on agricultural productivity or poverty reduction. Examples include agricultural censuses in Africa that have applied new methods of collecting intrahousehold data, which in many cases have yet to be analyzed, and longitudinal datasets (for example, ICRISAT's villagelevel surveys and IFPRI's datasets on Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Kenya). In such situations, relatively low levels of funding for gender analysis can yield valuable insights. Further linking gender-disaggregated data to geographic information systems (GIS) can ensure that gender is integrated in strategic foresight research, to better identify, for example, who are the key decisionmakers and stakeholders who will be affected by technology innovations or climate change.The CGIAR has internationally-recognized research capability in this area and has particular capability in studying the implications of gender in relation to agricultural research and its role in development. Researchers will both develop methodologies and analyze existing data collaboratively with in-country partners (especially NARSs), providing an opportunity for mutual capacity building. That is, CGIAR researchers can help strengthen NARSs' capacity to collect and analyze data while themselves learning more contextual information about local gender relations from their partners in country.The output of this activity will be strengthened information systems on gender in agriculture, including better methods, data, and analysis. Gender-disaggregated datasets will be documented and made available on the web so that they can be used in training courses and student theses. Synthesis studies on gender in agriculture will provide evidence on how and why it is important to pay attention to gender in agricultural projects. This work will feed into major global reports and processes, including providing information for the next World Bank World Development Report, which will focus on gender. The impact will be seen in public investments and agricultural research systems that meet the needs of both women and men.Research will also explore the role of technology policies in gender relations. As part of a larger, regular set of evaluation activities, researchers will formulate and test a range of hypotheses relating to (1) gender imbalances in access to assets, technology, and support services; (2) gender differentials in agricultural productivity and incomes (Alene et al. 2008); and (3) intrahousehold distributional impacts of technological and institutional innovations. Specific steps will be taken to leverage this knowledge to inform technology development and delivery systems so that both men and women benefit. Although the conceptual frameworks for each theme will differ, each will examine how contextual factors, assets, activities, and outcomes may differ for men and women, as well as examining the degree of \"jointness\" within households. During R&D interventions, in-depth baseline studies will initially be conducted on the roles, livelihood strategies, constraints, and preferences of male and female farmers (including the roles of female-headed households and female farmers within male-headed households). The results will be used to improve on the design of R&D interventions in ways that increase participation among disadvantaged groups and achieve an informed and balanced emphasis on empowering women and strengthening their assets.Evaluations of technical and institutional innovations will be designed to allow researchers to systematically assess gender-differentiated technology needs, choices, and constraints and to test mechanisms for targeting and delivering technologies for greater impacts among both men and women. Farmer participatory research and extension approaches will be used to promote participation of women and other marginalized groups in developing and disseminating technologies, as well as in evaluating programs, as called for under the GCARD Road Map (GFAR 2011). By expanding the range of genderdisaggregated analyses of potential and actual technology adoption and the impacts of alternative innovations, the program will increase awareness and use of gender analysis in agricultural research and extension. Special emphasis will be given to enhancing female farmers' capacity to obtain information, credit, and technologies and to integrating them into input and output markets to strengthen their assets and incomes.In addition, a number of the subtheme descriptions have identified how they will investigate gender issues as a cross-cutting theme.Research on the impact of technology policies on gender, health, and nutrition that will build on an irrigation technology evaluation on health, gender, and nutrition project conducted in Kenya and Tanzania. The \"Gender and Health Impacts of Genetically Engineered (GE) Crops in Developing Countries\" project will examine the interdynamics of these three topics.Research on policy processes will pay particular attention to the formal and informal institutions that can increase women's voices in agricultural policy processes through capacity development and work with leaders to improve their awareness and knowledge of the issues. Another example is the research on governance and institutions will identify strategies to make the provision of infrastructure and services more gender sensitive. These strategies will target public administration (such as promoting gender targets for extension services and training frontline service providers-both women and men-to address gender-based constraints), local political institutions (such as promoting women in local councils), and community-based organizations (such as examining gender dynamics in producer organizations and involving women's groups in service delivery). Research on property rights and assets will identify ways to strengthen women's tenure security and narrow the gender-asset gap to reduce present and future poverty.Research on value chains will promote increased opportunities for women and greater gender equity in value-chain development and operations. This work will consider ways to ensure that commercialization does not transfer control of assets from women to men, while improving the representation of women as actors throughout the value chain.Prioritization of gender work overall will emphasize areas in which gender disparities are greatest, notably in Africa and South Asia. A context-specific strategy of engagement and outreach on gender, including a training and communications strategy, will ensure that outputs serve the needs and capacities of women as clients and partners. CRP2 will, for example, include women in research teams, work with women's producer organizations, and address gender attitudes among managers, NGOs, aid administrators, and other key actors in the agricultural field. We will also build on our close collaboration with FAO and IFAD on gender issues to influence broader development policy and practitioner audiences. Continued close interaction with the other organizations brought together through GFAR at global and regional scales will ensure mutual synergies with the regional agricultural research-fordevelopment networks and constituencies of farmers, NGOs, private sector and national government research, extension and education institutions, maximizing the impact of the gender research and capacity strengthening in CRP2.Developing new tools and methods will be one of the hallmarks of CRP2's approach. Following the CGIAR Science Council's advice on the importance of using social science methodologies in interactions between social and biophysical scientists (CGIAR Science Council 2009), CRP2 will draw on the social science expertise of the CGIAR system and of other advanced research centers as well as on the unique knowledge of NARSs and local partners to assess existing policies, institutions, and investments.Box 6.1 summarizes the range of innovative and interdisciplinary methodologies that form the foundation of the research themes and subthemes described in sections 4 and 5 of this proposal. CRP2 will use cutting-edge research designs. These designs will include randomized experimental design to evaluate the impact of policy reform, institutional change, and marketing innovations; action research linked to comparative analysis; digital survey methods to ensure rapid turnaround; and GIS analysis of marketing networks and market accessibility. Experimental economics will incorporate farmer behavior into the testing of value-chain analysis and identify ways of strengthening farmers' organizations, as well as provide feedback to organizations to foster collective action. Various techniques for understanding gender differences, such as the collection and analysis of sex-disaggregated data and information on social norms, will be integrated into each research theme.Research on policy processes will be based on innovative quantitative methods, such as combining political economy modeling with computable general equilibrium modeling, and on innovative qualitative methods, such as the participatory influence mapping method, Net-Map. 21 To understand how policy change can occur despite political obstacles, researchers will apply analytical concepts in new ways. These possible lenses for analysis include the Advocacy Coalition Framework and the concepts of political capital, policy beliefs, and policy discourse. CRP2 will also apply creative methods for analyzing governance arrangements, such as empirically measuring the transaction costs incurred by farmers in accessing inputs and markets. Researchers will develop special assessment tools and indicators, such as gender-disaggregated governance indicators for agriculture and natural resource management.CRP2 promotes interdisciplinary research, another facet of its innovative approach to agricultural science. CRP2 researchers will use an economywide approach to integrate different policy and institutional topics within a particular region and to assess and compare the effects of alternative policy and institutional reforms on agricultural growth, income generation, poverty reduction, food security, and nutrition improvement. Although focused on agriculture, the policy work will examine links to other types of policies. Collaboration with biophysical scientists will enhance the synergy between technology and institutional innovations on the ground. Systematic comparative analysis of the economic and environmental impact of new technologies under alternative policy regimes across agroecosystems will enhance the understanding and impact of these technologies.To ensure policy relevance, CRP2 will work closely with other CRPs to ensure that the new technologies for accelerating agricultural growth that they are developing will reach small producers and the rural poor through the formulation of appropriate policies, effective and equitable governance structures, and efficient markets.Drawing on the expertise of the CGIAR system, we will apply a diversity of approaches and methods to research activities under CRP2. The analyses will be informed by state-of-the-art theoretical and conceptual frameworks and methods, a few of which are described here.  Econometric methods including cross-country panel data analyses, multilevel estimations, crosscommunity estimations, and intrahousehold and microeconometric approaches will be used to analyze the poverty and income distribution impacts of different policies.  Model-based simulation analyses will be used to assess the national and global impact of policies.Economywide models, such as CGE models, will be used in conjunction with farm/household and spatial models to assess these impacts at the household and local level. CGE models and agent-based models will also be combined with political-economy models to facilitate a better understanding of policy processes.  Strategic foresight assessments will be formalized on an ongoing basis for scenario analyses, using stateof-the-art modeling tools combining economic and biophysical models with geo-referenced physical data.  Social network analyses will be used to model, measure, and promote the inclusiveness and use of networks to encourage collective action and to better understand the innovation process, from discovery to development to delivery, emphasizing key decision points in the network. Data collection methods for network analyses include both gender-disaggregated questionnaire-based survey techniques and mapping techniques.  The value chain component will use innovative mixed methods to identify constraints and opportunities in the value chain. These methods will include sampling of mobile market agents, such as traders and across the whole value chain; margin calculation in diversified and seasonally affected producers and traders; definition and measurement of whole-chain performance; and industrial organization tools to measure power relationships. Experimental and pseudo-experimental methods will be used to understand consumer preferences regarding food safety and quality and the impacts of policies.  Qualitative analyses will be used by a range of subthemes. Techniques used will vary by subtheme (see Section 4) and will include participatory assessments, gender analyses, life histories, focus group discussions, interviews, ethnography, participant observation, and content analyses. Particularly in the work on collective action, the research will use a legal pluralism (Merry 1988) and polycentric governance (Ostrom 1999) approach, that recognizes both customary forms of cooperation, as well as those introduced by government and projects; thereby going beyond \"ownership\" as defined by state title to examine the entire bundle of rights derived from customary and statutory law.  Participatory action research will be used to improve the links between research and implementation and to catalyze institutional change. Engaging program implementers in action research will draw the focus to implementation modalities and the potential for scaling up. Action research also helps in the identification of gender-related constraints to participation and in testing ways to overcome these constraints.  Country Strategy Support Programs will be used to assist in collecting long-term household panel data, observing and understanding the development process, testing and experimenting with policy options, and building strong national capacity through collaborative research (see Box 3.3).  Experimental approaches and randomized controlled approaches will be used to evaluate impact and test policy options. Such approaches will be used to study the effect of rule changes on cooperation in collective action groups and to provide feedback to the groups to help them increase cooperation.  Gender and intrahousehold analysis will use the gender-disaggregated data collection mentioned above, integrating information derived through the different methods to understand how intrahousehold relations shape the outcome of policy or institutional changes. Analysis will go beyond unitary or bargaining household models to examine the separate assets, activities, income, and welfare of women and men, as well as what is shared within the household, based on age and gender differences.  Data banking and access will be developed, including long-term panel datasets and advanced web-based knowledge and information. This activity is further described in this section (CRP2 Data Strategy), and details specific to themes can be found in Section 4.In addition to directly undertaking novel research, CRP2 will seek to encourage innovative research practices more broadly. Therefore, CRP2 proposes an annual competitive grants program to promote innovation among researchers in both developed and developing countries. This competition will focus on top-priority research gaps identified by CRP2 research each year.The objective is to identify the most innovative and high-potential projects on the specific priority themes identified by CRP2 research. Grant funds will be used to implement the chosen projects at the pilot level and to carefully evaluate them. This program will help to identify simple solutions to complex problems to strengthen food security and incomes for the rural poor-best bets to be further researched and scaled up.The call for proposals will be widely announced at the beginning of the year and a committee of recognized researchers will identify the top five proposals. The key criteria for ranking the proposals will include their policy relevance, their potential to inform a methodologically rigorous study, innovativeness, and the degree of groundwork and preparation conducted for the pilot work.The best proposals will be accepted for funding, with the funding level and number of projects to be determined during the implementation phase. The selected researchers will have to deliver the results by the end of the year, and these results will be a key input into CRP2 research. In addition, the winning researchers will become part of the network of CRP2 researchers, which will facilitate joint research activities and generate additional benefits through technical and logistical support as well as fundraising assistance and joint publications.Within this network, CRP2 will organize technical meetings and outreach forums to promote scientific exchange between the winning researchers, experts, and policy practitioners. Interactions with policymakers will take place in collaboration with leading organizations at the regional and continental level. We expect these activities to help build research capacity in developing countries.There is a high level of synergy between world-class research and world-class information systems, which means that data should be treated as a corporate research asset. The quality, credibility, and cost of CRP2 research, the program's capacity to develop timely, relevant, and accessible research products and services, and its ability to respond to evolving research priorities, will all be highly conditioned by CRP2's data strategy. Therefore, the development of integrated data and knowledge management platforms is a priority of CRP2.CRP2's data strategy aims to reduce research costs, enrich analytical opportunities for CRP research partners, and deliver a major international public good in the form of an open-access data portal, which will foster broad opportunities for innovation beyond CRP2 by both the public and the private sectors. These objectives go well beyond existing practices for data management and sharing within and across CGIAR centers.Although there is still room for progress, a number of significant data sharing and networking examples within the CGIAR can serve as models for future success. Among these is the CGIAR's Consortium for Spatial Information (www.cgiar-csi.org), a grassroots, scientist-to-scientist network for spatial data and knowledge sharing. The CSI has been very successful in engaging the spatial community of the CGIAR in collaborative efforts to generate and share new data products, and has worked with partners within and outside the CGIAR to convene a flagship annual African Agriculture GIS Week that increasingly engages African students and young professionals as well as the private sector in fostering advances in the use of spatial data in African agricultural development. A second example is the ICT-KM program, which has promoted awareness and adoption of a broad range of new communication technologies for improved data sharing among CGIAR scientists. Other examples include the spatial data portal capacities of IWMI and the recently convened multicenter Trial Sites effort to harmonize and share technical data from CGIAR field trials and experiments. CRP2's holdings will include a wide range of spatially-explicit GIS data, secondary statistical and census/survey data, and primary datasets collected as part of CRP2's own field work, e.g., long-run panel household and village data collected to support analysis of how changes in policies, institutions, and markets are impacting food security and poverty at the micro-level. Examples include ICRISAT's Village Level Surveys and IFPRI's China, Ethiopia, Ghana, and Nigeria surveys. Other components of CRP2's shared data resources include access to key bibliographic source material underpinning CRP2 research themes, as well as a very large and continually expanding set of analytical results (e.g. output data from scenario runs for CRP2 Strategic Foresight models such as IMPACT, MIRAGE, crop models, and DREAM).Three start-up action items are planned for the initial implementation of the CRP2 data strategy:1. Commission a CRP2 data, tool, and specialist resource inventory. To provide a detailed scoping of the initial range of CRP2 data and tools as well as of the CGIAR and partner specialists who develop, manage, and apply those assets, a draft CRP2 data, tool, and specialist resource inventory will be compiled within four months of the launch of CRP2. In addition to providing key information to guide the startup priorities of the Data Systems Team (see item 2, below), the inventory will feed into the deliberations of the Data Strategy Task Force (see item 3) and guide the program management on filling gaps in the availability of relevant data expertise in each CRP2 center. The inventory will be posted on the CRP2 data portal/website. The ongoing maintenance of the inventory will become a key responsibility of all CRP2 staff with data responsibilities.2. Form a CRP2 Data Systems Team. This would entail recruiting a web/cloud-oriented data systems leader, reporting to the CRP director, whose responsibilities would include the initial design and implementation of cross-center and cross-partner data and metadata management systems, tools, and sharing protocols to support data access and sharing (initially aimed only at the needs of researchers in CGIAR participating centers). The focus will be on software systems, tools, and logical data structures that facilitate acquisition, management, and sharing of core datasets identified by the CRP2 inventory activity (see item 1). The physical and networking infrastructure required to support these \"soft\" systems will be obtained by contracting existing CG center ICT or third-party ICT service providers, whereas the Data Systems Team will focus its efforts on developing data management, access and interoperability as well as necessary project management tools.3. Convene a Data Strategy Task Force (1 year mandate). Within six months of approval of CRP2, a Data Strategy Task Force will be convened and mandated to develop a staged vision of a CRP Data Systems Design and Implementation Plan. This plan will provide an ambitious two to three year work plan for the Data Systems team, including initial program level goals and milestones. Task Force members will partly be drawn from constituent CRP2 CGIAR centers and partners, but will also include external specialists and thought leaders in data and knowledge management (for example, the CGIAR's ICT/KM program and Consortium for Spatial Information (CSI), Google, and Tableau). Other recommendations will include best-practice standards for research data documentation and for data release and data sharing policies, that will be factored into the design and costing structure of CRP2's research investments.Ultimately the data strategy will be deemed successful if (a) it provides a means of compiling, harmonizing and sharing data resources and tools amongst the distributed CRP2 research teams, and (b) it provides a range of external users with deep and flexible access to CRP2's core data collections and analytical results and, increasingly, to tools that add value for specific user needs. Some objectives of the data strategy are listed here: Evaluating and adopting innovative, more reliable, and cost-effective data collection and validation technologies and best practices: such as low-cost household/community data recording devices; natural resource, production, and price monitoring systems; use of nanotechnology; satellite-based remote sensing; mobile phone infrastructure; and crowd-sourcing approaches  Using ICT tools to accelerate the two-way transfer and built-in consistency and validation checking of data between collection and use locations  Adopting interoperable database management structures to ensure cost-effective management, and efficient cross-theme integration of survey, statistical, spatial, and other data as well as CRP2 model results  Better sharing of research data, analytical results, and modeling tools among research partners using advanced metadata and data-networking technologies and practices  State-of-the-art data query, mining, and integration platforms and tools to deliver data and knowledge aggregation products targeted to the needs of key CRP2 clients and audiences: building, for example, on the initial efforts of such CRP2 components as HarvestChoice, Global Futures, ASTI, the Food Security Portal, MacMap, Global Futures CASE maps, Public Spending Database (SPEED), and ReSAKSSCRP2 sets out an ambitious agenda for research and impact, and achieving it will require concerted collective effort. The CGIAR centers have long provided crop varieties and other agricultural technologies that address many of the problems smallholders face and that have the potential to push the boundary of agricultural productivity. CRP2 will help ensure that these technologies can take root in a policy, governance, and market environment designed to support their use and exploit the enormous potential of agricultural growth to improve human well-being. CGIAR researchers not only can draw upon expertise in a number of social and natural sciences, but also have strong ties to governments and other stakeholders that play a critical role in these institutional aspects of development.Of course, the CGIAR centers cannot do all of the research, or even less achieve impact, alone. Meeting the research and implementation objectives requires close partnerships with conventional research partners from universities and NARSs, but also with a range of stakeholders, such as farmer organizations, research and advisory institutions, governments, development agencies, donor agencies, and the private sector, at the national, regional, and global levels. As documented in Annex 64, the CGIAR centers participating in CRP2 currently collaborate with more than 500 partner organizations. Examples of specific partnerships are provided in this section and in the descriptions of the research subthemes in Section 4.The Center for Chinese Agricultural Policy (CCAP), Chinese Academy of Science, is the premier agricultural policy and research institute in China. CCAP's mission is to undertake rigorous strategic and applied research that helps to analyze the problems and challenges facing China's agricultural policymakers and producers. It has four major research programs: agricultural science and technology policy; resources and the environment policy; rural development and poverty alleviation; and commodity market, food security, and decision support systems. In past five years, CCAP has led or coordinated more than 50 research projects related to agricultural and rural development, funded by both the Chinese government and international donors. Findings of CCAP studies have not only generated significant publications in international journals, but have also played important roles in China's decisionmaking in agricultural policy. CCAP has had relations with CRP2 partners, particularly with IFPRI, for more than 15 years. The close relationship started when Jikun Huang, now professor and director of CCAP, spent one year at IFPRI to develop a supply-and-demand modeling framework to assess challenges to food production growth in China along the lines of IFPRI's International Model for Policy Analysis of Agricultural Commodities and Trade (IMPACT), a key player in global food markets. The relationship has continued with joint research and outreach work over the years, covering topics including the future of Chinese agriculture, biotechnology policy, water institutions and management policy, food demand and supply modeling, public investment in agriculture, impact of biofuels on agriculture and poverty, economic and health impact of biofortification, as well as ecosystem services in agriculture.Policy and practitioner partners refer to those organizations that are not directly involved in the research itself but have a direct stake in its outcomes. Examples include government agencies that request policy advice; donor organizations that seek advice on new strategies or priorities for investment; governments or NGOs implementing programs that are being evaluated by the research projects; farmers' organizations that work with researchers to identify ways to strengthen their capacity; and private sector actors that participate in value-chain innovations to help small-scale producers reach high-value markets. These partners are called upon to work with the researchers to set priorities and identify the key questions to be addressed. They will also be associated with implementing projects in various ways, such as facilitating research, participating as respondents, discussing and giving feedback on emerging findings, and using findings to improve policy and program design and implementation. As active partners during the research, they are also likely to apply the research findings in their ongoing work, thereby contributing to translating research outputs into outcomes. An example of such a partnership is provided in Box 7.4.Existing partnerships with the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA), West and Central African Council for Agricultural Research and Development (CORAF), and South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) will be further strengthened, both through direct collaboration and by working through GFAR.Policy research institutions such as IFPRI have the capacity to identify and promote innovative, researchbased policy options for rural poverty reduction. However, pro-poor policy innovation must be tested on the ground and negotiated with all stakeholders before becoming concrete and effective solutions. IFAD has the capacity to design and finance projects through which developing countries can test and implement such innovative solutions on various scales.The overall goal of the IFAD-IFPRI Strategic Partnership Programme is to enable the rural poor-with due attention to gender-to have better access to and capacity to take advantage of new market opportunities, especially markets for high-value agricultural products and markets for climate change mitigation and other environmental services. This will be achieved through applied policy research and knowledge management and sharing between IFAD, IFPRI, and selected countries, combined with investment, impact evaluation, and scaling-up based on the results of the program. The specific objectives are (1) to strengthen the capacity of country program partners to analyse and address policy issues, in particular those related to improving access by small farmers to new market opportunities in agriculture, including for high value products, and for climate change mitigation and other environmental services; (2) to identify, test, and evaluate innovative policy, institutional, and program options for improved access to such market opportunities; and (3) to disseminate and mainstream the identified options so that they become solutions in national policies and investment programs.These objectives are being pursued in a single program to develop positive synergies in efforts to promote pro-poor access to high-value commodity markets and markets for climate change mitigation and other environmental services, as well as to facilitate interorganizational cooperation and lower transaction costs and ensure a rigorous approach to innovation and its mainstreaming in IFAD-funded operations.Knowledge-sharing partners are those who help to store and transmit knowledge. They may be key in disseminating information to their own constituency (as when a donor agency shares findings from research in one site to its offices in other countries) or to a broader public. Knowledge-sharing partners also play a critical role in capacity strengthening; this is the case when universities use research findings in courses or graduate research or when other organizations run training courses using the research outcomes.In some cases, the same organization may have all three types of partnerships with CRP2, such as when an agricultural research institute or NGO participates in the research, helps to implement policy innovations, and takes part in dissemination of research findings.Because partnerships play a crucial role in achieving impact, there is broad correspondence between the types of partners and the three impact pathways of CRP2 (see Section 3 and especially Figure 3.1). In general, research partners play the greatest role in impact pathway 1, by helping to influence and strengthen other research. For example, NARSs that work with the foresight or science policy subthemes will be better able to target their technical research to meet the needs of poor people.  Practitioner partners play a key role in impact pathway 2, influencing the policy development and implementation arena. By participating in the research in some way, these agencies are more likely to be aware of the findings and to apply them in practice. Similarly, policy partners are key in impact pathway 3. Researchers may work directly with such \"boundary partners\" for the direct purpose of influencing their behavior or positions. For example, in Indonesia, ICRAF researchers worked directly with a range of stakeholders (including farmers, foresters, local officials, and policymakers) to reconcile differences in their expectations and aspirations on watershed functions for the purpose of achieving more sustainable management of the resource (see Box 7.5).  Knowledge-sharing partners play a role in all three pathways, by ensuring that the findings are communicated effectively not only to the research, policy, and practitioner communities, but also to a broader public, and by helping with capacity strengthening.CRP2 brings the particular added value of international research to bear in working in close partnership with national and regional actors to help achieve desired national and local development outcomes. Engaging with partners as part of a shared learning process helps generate clear impact pathways between research activities and development impacts. Partnerships can lead to greater impact by, for example  allowing researchers to collaborate with community groups to implement action research programs or link producers more effectively with markets; facilitating dissemination, as NGOs and NARSs bridge the space between research projects and farmers' fields, leading to increased adoption of innovations; and enabling results to be disseminated more widely through media organizations and professional associations.In West Sumatra, Indonesia, in the early 1990s, the government believed that uncontrolled deforestation and conversion to coffee on sloping lands had led to significant increases in erosion, which was threatening the operation of a newly constructed hydropower dam and reducing water availability for irrigated paddy rice downstream. As a consequence, between 1991 and 1996 thousands of farmers from Sumberjaya Forest were evicted. However, studies by ICRAF in the area showed that multi-strata coffee farms not only provided livelihoods to people, but also acted similarly to the natural forest in controlling erosion. ICRAF scientists focused on clarifying the knowledge differences between and among local people, foresters, local officials, and policymakers on forest hydrological functions. The basis for collective action was rooted in the benefit of reconciling the expectations and aspirations of these multiple stakeholders on watershed functions. Local communities joined together to gain access to the Indonesian government's Community Forestry Program, which provides farmers with conditional land tenure to cultivate protected forest. In exchange, farmers adopted environmentally friendly farming practices and protect the remaining natural forest, thus ensuring that the land will continue to protect the watershed. In the context of payments for ecosystem services, this \"conditional tenure\" is a reward, incentive, or payment that modifies farmer behavior. A recent impact study of land tenure in Sumberjaya found that community forestry permitted increased land tenure security, doubled local land values, reduced corruption, increased income (mostly through a reduction in bribes), increased equity, promoted tree planting and agroforestry, promoted soil and water conservation, and motivated farmers to protect remaining natural forest.CRP2 seeks to ensure that the partnerships forged are mutually beneficial and adhere to the need to build on complementary expertise. Consistent rules are needed for the selection of partners, as well as clarity regarding the roles each partner will play. While working closely together, partners should remain focused on their areas of expertise. Thus, partnerships in CRP2 will not involve researchers undertaking development projects or development agencies managing research initiatives. Rather, partnerships will establish clear, mutually beneficial complementarities.In some cases, research organizations can work directly to channel research results and identify recommendations to policymakers, strengthening their role in the policy process. Some universities, NARSs, and CGIAR centers, for example, have partnered for many years, each contributing funds, personnel, infrastructure, and materials to ongoing research activities; other partnerships may be of shorter duration, or even for a single event only.In situations where funds are available for enabling direct participation of a certain organization in delivering the program's outputs, the partnership will be formalized under a contractual agreement. In other cases, and provided that the research meets their own objectives, partners will contribute their own or complementary resources from other funding sources and synergistically align their work with CRP2 to deliver enhanced outcomes through collaborative actions.A critical step in developing effective and impact-enhancing partnerships is the selection of additional relevant partners from civil society, the public sector, and the private sector. The selected partners should have similar interests in contributing to reaching the MDGs through targeting the rural poor; significant leverage or reach in their spheres of influence; and a clear capacity to develop and test prototypes, evaluate lessons learned, and upscale effective results. While specific partner agencies are best defined at the regional level, candidates might include national and international NGOs capable of reaching hundreds of thousands or millions of farmers; 22 multilateral, bilateral, or philanthropic funding agencies with significant investments in projects supporting relevant market-related initiatives 23 ; national and subnational government agencies; and key private companies involved in crops and geographies important to the rural poor. 24 The process of partner selection will occur at the regional level, but will be linked to the overall CRP2 learning agenda at the global scale.The identification of relevant partners of the three types defined above cannot be a one-shot exercise, but will rather be a continuous and open process. Additional regional or national institutions or initiatives may emerge as stronger partners after a while as a result of capacity-building activities spearheaded by the CRPs and other international programs. Given the fundamental role that partnerships play in CRP2 to catalyze collaborative actions and sharing of knowledge, we propose that development of partnerships will become an integral part of the program. This will be achieved by closely involving existing partnership mobilization structures, such as GFAR and the wide range of stakeholders it brings together through regional forums and sectoral networks. A CRP2 partnership status report will be prepared on a semi-annual basis.In some area of research-such as investment strategies, futures scenarios, and macroeconomic and international trade policy-CRP2, with the well-recognized expertise of IFPRI and other CGIAR centers in scientific analysis of key agricultural issues at a global scale, has a clear comparative advantage compared to other CRPs. This advantage has its greatest value when brought together with other global, regional, and national foresight initiatives as they develop in the context of the implementation of the GCARD Road Map. In other areas, strong research cooperation is also needed across CRPs and partnering institutions.In the area of value chains, for example (see Annex 3), CRP2 will engage in cutting-edge methodology development and lead cross-commodity synthesis, the main focus being linking smallholders to (local, regional, and international) markets. CRP2 will also support CRP3's commodityspecific capacities by providing specialized expertise in developing, validating, and refining economic models and policy questions. In undertaking collaborative work on cross-commodity synthesis, CRP3's input will focus on commodity-and production system-specific research, which requires close linkages between social scientists and biophysical scientists in developing appropriate, demand-driven innovations. Many commodities have differentiated value chains that may also vary across farming systems and policy environments. As a result, in cooperation with CRP2, CRP3's work on value chains will focus on their commodity-specific value chains. For example, CRP3 will focus on the maize-and wheat-specific elements of technology targeting, adoption, and impact assessments; analysis of seed systems, input delivery systems, and associated value chains; differentiated markets and value chains; the maize/wheat systems-specific elements of poverty; gender studies, system dynamics, and social and environmental footprints of maize/wheat interventions.In the area of natural resource management policies, the focus of CRP2 is production and technology policies that enable pro-poor and gender-equitable growth and strengthen capacity related to food, agriculture, and rural development. CRP2 will perform this work across locations, agricultural commodities, and farming systems, including those studied by CRP1 and CRP3. Moreover, CRP2 will look at market-agent interactions, biophysical-environment linkages, and institutional and policy constraints to assess sustainable agricultural production policies across scales. CRP2 will also work with CRP7 on policies, institutions, and investments for natural resource management (NRM) related to climate change, and with CRP5 on policies, institutions, and investments for NRM related to water.The issues of governance, collective action, and property rights also cut across CRPs. CRP2 will provide intellectual leadership in the broad areas of governance, collective action, and property rights research, leading the development of high-level hypotheses, and support for methods. CRP2 will also engage in broader partnerships for research and to enhance impacts. CRP2 should be the nexus for research on land tenure; cross-cutting gender, agriculture, and NRM issues; and implementation of collective action for marketing and agricultural production. Other CRPs will collaborate with CRP2 in these areas where appropriate and lead research in governance, collective action, and property rights issues of particular relevance to their topic of focus. In addition to the broad principles described in the preceding paragraphs, additional detail on the intersection of CRP2 research themes with other CRPs is presented in Table 7.1 and in Annex 2.As shown in Table 7.1 and Annex 2, the linkages across CRPs in the policy area are quite complex. During the period of CRP development, it has not been possible to fully delineate the boundaries across CRPs and the detailed responsibility of all policy, institutions, and markets research. Therefore, we propose to call a planning meeting involving the leaders of the policy components in each CRP upon acceptance of the various CRPs, in order to fully develop the delineation of boundaries and integration of policy and social science research across the CRPs. This meeting could evolve into an annual scientific meeting on policy and social science research in the different CRPs.Box 7.6 gives an example of partnerships between centers under CRP2. See also Box 8.2 on the Central American Learning Alliance for Rural Enterprise Development. Annex 4 shows some ways in which work by the different centers can contribute to the different subthemes of CRP2. However, this is based on current work and does not reflect the whole dimension of IFPRI's partnerships with centers, which will from now on be implemented through CRP2 and other CRPs.The current strategy for a policy renewal process in Africa, together with related development efforts such as the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Program (CAADP), provide a significant scope to expand current partnership and capacity-building activities under CRP2. The most important among these to be integrated with CRP2 are (1) the (3) nearly two dozen countries across Africa. Under ReSAKSS, the CG centers and their partners are supporting a transition toward evidence-based policy planning and implementation, which is one of the key objectives of CAADP. This is being done through targeted collaborative research and the development of IT-based data and knowledge platforms at the regional and country levels to facilitate benchmarking, dissemination of best practices, and mutual learning.In order to expand and sustain the analytical work feeding into the ReSAKSS, a complementary policy research capacity building has been launched: the African Growth and Development Policy Modeling Consortium (AGRODEP). The latter is a partnership between IFPRI and the two leading subregional research organizations (SROs) in Africa-the West and Central Africa Council on Agricultural Research and Development (WECARD/CORAF) and the Association for the Advancement of Agricultural Research in East and Central Africa (ASARECA)-as well as the Food, Agriculture, and Natural Resources Policy Network (FANRPAN). The ultimate goal of AGRODEP is to facilitate the emergence of a critical mass of world-class modelers in Africa, thereby creating local capacities to address issues of strategic importance to Africa and to partner with outside modelers dealing with issues of global concern. Under the Consortium, (1) a shared, IT-based modeling infrastructure will be established to allow Consortium members across Africa access to a family of cutting edge modeling tools;(2) a distributed database linking major data sources on Africa will be created to facilitate access to high quality data by members; and (3) a community of practitioners will be constituted to pursue a limited set a key strategic policy research agenda items in Africa. Strengthening the capacity of the collaborators and of those who will translate research results into onthe-ground impacts is a key element of CRP2, as described above. The capacity-strengthening mechanisms that will be used as part of CRP2 range from links with formal academic programs, to working with developing-country policy analysts to ensure they have the tools they need to answer policy questions in their countries, to the creation of development-oriented learning networks at the regional scale. Meeting the demand for capacity strengthening creates international public goods that help to amplify the impact of CPR2 over time and beyond the immediate areas where research is done.The mechanisms for capacity strengthening in CRP2 can be divided into two broad sets of activities, which will be combined to achieve the desired development impacts: Capacity strengthening through collaborative research partnerships  Production of global public goods for long-term capacity developmentThis first type of capacity-strengthening work focuses on sharing research methods and results developed from the research components with key partners (the private sector, development NGOs, public-sector agencies, Southern and Northern research centers, other CRPs, and donors). This sharing is based on the premise of collaboration and mutual accountability with a shared goal of contributing to improved propoor policies, institutions, and markets. (See Section 7 for a detailed description of partnerships and Section 4 for additional information within the various research themes and subthemes.)The long-term sustainability of the capacity-strengthening efforts will be ensured by the production of a set of global public goods that partner institutions can effectively use to build local capacity and enhance the use of research methods, tools, and results generated from CRP2. This approach will have a multiplier effect, going beyond the aforementioned collaborative partnerships to reach a new generation of policy researchers and analysts-even beyond the time period and locations covered by CRP2. specialists to a \"writeshop\" to develop a sourcebook adapting key CAPRi publications and case studies for nonspecialists. These materials were used by an NGO to train Ministry of Environment staff in El Salvador even before the sourcebook's release. Other universities are considering using the sourcebook in introductory courses, with links to the original source materials for more depth. The sourcebook was released in January 2011 at the International Association for the Study of the Commons conference, where it reached a network of more than 1,000 researchers and practitioners working at the interface of collective action and property rights for sustainable resource management. The Foundation for Ecological Security, an Indian NGO, is using these materials in its Commons Initiative to strengthen property rights and management of common property in India.Achieving the appropriate balance between academic and applied capacity strengthening is critical for achieving immediate impact and ensuring the next generation of researchers, policymakers, and practitioners who understand the policy research results. In line with this goal, each research subtheme will identify a range of capacity-strengthening activities as an integral part of its work (see Section 4 for some initial description of these activities). As an entry point to this capacity-strengthening action plan, each subtheme needs to define the key capacities to be strengthened, the target audiences, and the level of capacity to be achieved at the end of the project period. For Theme 1, for example, key capacities to be strengthened would include policy research; target audiences would include researchers in government ministries, academic institutions, and think tanks; and the ultimate goal would be increased national capacity for policy analysis and research that leads to investments for pro-poor growth.Despite the investments made in initiatives to improve rural livelihoods in the global South, rural poverty persists. The ability of useful research to benefit the poor is limited by the small amount of collective learning that occurs among researchers, development workers, donors, policymakers, and private enterprises.In 2003, the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), with the support of International Development Research Centre (IDRC), convened a group of actors from Central America, including major international NGOs, local NGOs, and the Honduran National University, with the aim of improving this situation through increased collaborative learning on rural enterprise development in four countries: El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua. The Central American Learning Alliance works with 25 direct partner agencies and through their networks supports 116 additional organizations.By the end of the first phase in 2008, the Learning Alliance had contributed to change in organizations working with 33,000 rural families (approximately 175,000 people) in the four countries. Seven years after the start of the project, significant changes have taken place in partners' knowledge, attitude, and practices. Evidence shows improved connections between organizations working on similar topics, better access to information and knowledge on rural enterprise development, and use of improved methods and tools. As partners realize that working together enhances their capacity to serve rural communities needs, attitudes have shifted from competition to collaboration. Moreover, the Learning Alliance approach to agroenterprise development has spread far beyond Central America. It has been used by Catholic Relief Services to increase staff capacity in rural enterprise development in more than 45 countries. Rural enterprise development practices and knowledge management have improved as a result of increased effectiveness in existing projects and a higher number of strategic new projects. These shifts, in turn, contribute to a more efficient innovation system in favor of rural enterprise development, as evidenced by the shared use and generation of information, joint capacity-building programs, and largescale collaborative projects.Themes 1 and 2 will emphasize strengthening the capacity of NARSs and public-sector actors to conduct economic research and analysis, make sense of the findings, and then apply them to real-world policies in diverse national and subnational contexts (see Box 8.1). To achieve this goal, CRP2 will link with formal academic programs in the North and South to sponsor and incorporate M.Sc. and Ph.D. candidates in proposed research activities and develop curriculum materials based on research outputs. For government policymakers (both public-sector employees and parliamentarians), CRP2 will organize targeted training courses on how to commission, analyze, and use research findings in public policy formulation. Finally, CRP2 will link emerging research and public policy capacities to specific regional learning platforms, including NGOs and producer organizations that will function as \"communities of practice\" for horizontal learning and coaching.Theme 3 will construct a set of interlinked learning cycles at the regional scale involving researchers and practitioners. CRP2 researchers will draw on existing theoretical and case study literature to develop a prototype practitioners' toolkit that will be tested in pilot sites, and evaluated in diverse conditions to document outcomes in terms of pro-poor benefits, leading to a refined and improved toolkit. The use of learning cycles will allow us to generate a range of knowledge products and increased capacities in collaboration with implementing agencies as direct clients capable of taking these market innovations to scale in favor of the poor (see Box 8.2).The methods and tools resulting from the learning cycles can be further used to support applied capacity strengthening programs targeted specifically at key extension or impact partners, such as international NGOs. An example of specific capacity development programs is the Post-Graduate Diploma in Rural Enterprise Development offered jointly by CIAT and Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza (CATIE) in Latin America since 2001. 25 This set of interlinked courses has successfully trained several hundred NGO staff throughout the region with limited donor support. Another example is the CGIAR's work with the Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics (CMAEE) in Eastern, Central, and Southern Africa (CMAAE), in which IFPRI and CAPRi have provided course materials and curriculum input for courses that reach students in more than a dozen countries.Output indicators of capacity strengthening include the number of men and women trained as students collaborating with CRP2 projects and trainees at short courses, as well as the number of training modules and curriculum materials developed. Outcome indicators of the first capacity-strengthening strategy-capacity strengthening through collaborative research partnerships-requires assessing how much participants in training have strengthened their skills and increased their confidence and ability to incorporate research findings into their policy work. Outcome indicators of the global public goods work on capacity strengthening would include the number of universities using the curriculum materials (texts, articles, DVDs, and audiovisual materials).CRP2's overall objectives-to increase income, reduce poverty, and improve food security for male and female farmers across the world-will be achieved by focusing on three mutually supporting themes: policies and investments that accelerate pro-poor growth; enabling institutions and governance for the poor; and value chains linking smallholder farmers to markets.The innovative research produced under this program will rely on a state-of-the-art communications strategy based on successful CGIAR outreach strategies carried out in the past. The overall purpose of such a comprehensive external and internal strategy is to forge close ties with local collaborators and key policymakers; increase opportunities for hands-on research in the field; and promote seamless collaboration among CGIAR centers, all of which leads to enhanced dissemination and impact of research results.The internal and external communications strategy of CRP2 will determine in detail  important messages that should be communicated to its audience; Key internal stakeholders, as well as global and regional stakeholders in developing and developed countries, to whom messages and results should be communicated; a portfolio of media and channels (print, web, audio, and visual) through which these communications will take place; optimal timing of communications activities to achieve maximum mileage; resources available to achieve the strategic communications goals; information policymakers need in order to make evidence-based, informed decisions on agricultural and rural policies; collaboration efforts to strengthen the communications capacity of local institutions; the creation and management of information systems to compile and organize knowledge for maximum access and impact on policy; and  use of policy dialogues and close interaction with policymakers and other key stakeholders on a local, national, and global level.CRP2 will produce a wide range of outputs to be communicated to various audiences:  research results disseminated in scholarly and policy-oriented publications; the effective use of research-based knowledge in policy processes, indicated by the use of research-based studies in different stages of policymaking; research-based information to all relevant stakeholders in the public and private sectors; policy reforms that lead to more pro-poor national and international agricultural policies; analytical and capacity-strengthening mechanisms and learning networks; relevant, timely, and accessible datasets; qualitative and quantitative knowledge products  policy and investment analyses that facilitate and support evidence-based decisionmaking; and  methodologies and tools for monitoring and evaluation.The program's target groups include global and local stakeholders, such as donors, development banks, international and local research and academic institutions, CGIAR centers, NGOs, country-level policymakers, policy analysts and advisers in government ministries, and country-level academics. Partners will also be targeted.Each group of stakeholders has different needs, so the use of CRP2's outputs might differ widely from one stakeholder group to the next. Because of this diversity of stakeholder groups, we will define a concise and structured approach to reaching each group. For certain stakeholders, CRP2's more traditional outputs, which include country briefs/fact sheets, regional reports, presentations, and other publications, will suffice. Other stakeholders, however, might require custom-made publications and presentations. Theme leaders will work with the communications team to indentify stakeholders and design relevant vehicles for these stakeholders.A well-designed website plays a key role in fostering cooperation and information sharing with stakeholders, especially in terms of increased functionality, improved access to information, presentation features, and enhanced visibility. A preliminary meeting among the CGIAR's web experts will establish the website design and content. A system will also be established to regularly update and improve the site.Publications will play a key role in increasing CRP2's visibility among its national and international audiences. A strategy will be devised to ensure that research results are successfully reaching the desired outlets; submissions to journals and donor newsletters are frequent and successful; and the review, update, and distribution of brochures and other printed materials are systematic and effective.The CRP2 will also establish a web-based information and knowledge clearinghouse that will serve as a repository for all existing and future products developed through the CRP2's three themes. This repository will be designed for use by other CGIAR researchers working on these issues, as well as the broader development research audience. The clearinghouse will include a common toolbox of methods for use by the CGIAR and R&D partners built around CRP2 prototypes and best practices from CRP2 and components of other CRPs.A focus on datasets is essential to the overall communications strategy, because these outputs will help improve the quality, timeliness, transparency, and objectivity of evaluations of high-impact policy investments and promote the development of effective and efficient investment portfolios.The CRP2 will offer a repertoire of strategically advertised seminars, outreach, and capacitystrengthening activities, the capstone of which will be a biennial CGIAR Strategic Foresight Conference. Designed to showcase the CRP's newest projections, evaluation tools, and datasets, it will be framed as the premiere CRP2 event to all stakeholders.Media talent culled from the associated CGIAR centers will work with the extensive network of journalists already familiar with the CGIAR to promote the launching of tools, reports, and other products produced by the CRP2 of interest to the media. The media team will build a fine-tuned media list organized by component, region, stakeholder, and specialized topic (such as climate change or gender). It will also devise a system of recording media mentions of CRP2 work.A communications team will be built from the associated CGIAR centers' staff. The team will work closely with CRP2's central communications office, as well as the CRP2's leaders, to carry out the tasks laid out in this strategy. If necessary, additional staff will be hired to ensure that communications goals are effectively carried out.Because CRP2 operates across CGIAR centers, effective internal communication is as essential as strategic external communications. Because the communications team will often work virtually, the web will play a central role in internal communications. To this end, the team will establish a web-based (Google group, open atrium) collaboration page for sharing documents and create a central repository of communication materials for the program. This virtual internal communications system should revolve around the following elements: To improve the creation and dissemination of publications, the communications team will create an interactive, web-based organization chart for CRP2 to identify relationships and potential collaborations. It will also create a web-based system for distributing relevant CRP2 publications throughout CGIAR centers and send out a monthly communications email to the communications team and research leaders with updates, developments, and calls for collaboration. To bolster capacity strengthening through events, the communications team will increase the number of internal \"virtual brown bags\" reporting on program developments, findings, and best practices. The team will create a system of webbased meetings that would allow CRP2 staff to discuss an issue across time zones.partner organizations of CRP2. Nominations for the 10-person panel (including the chair) will be actively canvassed from participating centers and partners by the Management Committee to ensure broad acceptance and representation. The nominees will include eminent scientists and policy advisers from the Consortium, the public and private sectors, and civil society. The slate of candidates will be proposed to the IFPRI director general for confirmation by the IFPRI Board. The SPAP will provide advice and a formal annual report to the Lead Center Board. It is expected that the chair of the SPAP will communicate regularly with the chair of the Lead Center. The CRP director and Management Committee will prepare an annual report for the SPAP. The Science and Policy Advisory Panel will have delegated authority from the IFPRI Board to undertake their mandate as an independent expert body.The Lead Center will be the primary contracting unit for CRP2 and will sign performance contracts with the Consortium Board and subcontracts with participating centers and partners. The Lead Center will report to the Consortium Board on CRP2 performance from research and financial perspectives.The Lead Center will develop and authorize management policies. CRP2 activities will be reported by the respective centers in their audited financial statements. The Lead Center will prepare financial statements for the overall CRP2 showing fund receipts and payments to participating centers and partners and other details as agreed by the Consortium/Lead Center in due course.Conflict resolution mechanisms will be implemented as follows. Conflicts among centers/partners will in the first instance be referred to the Management Committee. When conflicts cannot be resolved at that level, the issue will be referred to the chair of the SPAP if they concern programmatic issues and to the Lead Center director general if they concern fiduciary, legal, or reputational issues. If necessary, the Lead Center Board will be consulted, and, where appropriate, the issue maybe referred to them for a decision. If the conflict cannot be resolved at these levels it will be referred to the Consortium Board.The CRP2 director will be appointed by the Lead Center and will report directly to the IFPRI director general. The CRP2 director, assisted by the Management Committee, will be responsible for overall management of CRP2. The CRP2 director and Management Committee will act on behalf of all participating institutions and will make key decisions in a consultative manner. The Management Committee will consist of the following: The CRP2 director (who will serve as chair of the Management Committee)  The leader of Theme 1 and another representative of Theme 1 chosen among the Subtheme leaders  The leader of Theme 2 and another representative of Theme 2 chosen among the Subtheme leaders  The leader of Theme 3  The leader of the Strategic Research on Gender.Theme 3 has a higher level of homogeneity than Theme 1 and Theme 2, which is why it will be represented by only one member. The relatively small size of the Management Committee will keep meeting costs as modest as possible while enhancing management efficiency. To reflect the importance of the participation of other centers and partners in the management processes, a minimum of three members will be drawn from centers or other partners than IFPRI.The Management Committee will be responsible for the following activities: coordinating strategic foresight, planning, and reporting of the full research portfolio; preparing the five-year and annual work plans with the Management Committee and the theme leaders; prioritizing research activities using the priority-setting processes detailed in Section 3 of this proposal; determining the allocation of resources coming from the CGIAR Fund to the research themes and their activities, based on the priority-setting process, evidence collected from regular assessments, and monitoring of agreed-on work plans submitted by the participating centers and their strategic partners; interfacing between CRP2 and the Consortium Board and Fund (budgets, contracts, and financial reporting); representing CRP2 at major events of the global and regional R&D communities; fundraising (together with the centers and other partners); managing the monitoring and evaluation program described in detail in Section 3, including establishing reporting regimes and developing mechanisms for tracking progress against agreed milestones and budget use; organizing periodic research reviews; and preparing and conducting annual meetings of the SPAP, the Management Committee, the research leaders of CRP2 subthemes, and other small workshops with the research and development community worldwide.To carry out these tasks, the CRP2 director and Management Committee will be assisted by a small Program Management Unit (PMU), including a program manager and a research coordinator. Funds for CRP2 management will consist of (1) a fund to help catalyze teamwork, new research, and delivery activities with partners; (2) funds to implement cross-cutting activities related to gender, science capacity strengthening, and Strategic Foresight functions; (3) and general program management funds, including communications, workshops and travel, and CGIAR integration.The overall mode of operation will provide for considerable decentralized decisionmaking (see Box 10.1). Each theme and subtheme will operate on an appropriately designed partnership model. The research activities of the portfolio will be developed and implemented under performance contracts between the Lead Center and a center or other institution that has leadership of the theme. The theme leaders and their teams will have considerable flexibility in developing, managing, and implementing research activities. Each organization leading a subtheme will be responsible and accountable for managing its activities together with team partners, ensuring that work is consistent with the CRP business plan, and delivering results. This approach will ensure that wherever possible, funds, responsibilities, and accountabilities are devolved to the center, unit, or partner undertaking specific tasks.There are risks ahead in managing these complex, multidisciplinary research activities and integrating them into the work of other CRPs and other CGIAR centers. We see three categories of risk: Administrative risks. With CRP2 spanning many CGIAR centers and partners, the management structure within the CRP itself and across other CRPs could be complex. Rather than trying to build another bureaucracy, we will address this risk through efficient M&E systems, mediation processes, and decentralization to existing centers. A clear outline of the role of various institutions (along with timelines for deliverables) and the interaction of different segments will be prepared at the inception of the CRP. Financial risks. The current funding base could be too small and fragmented to successfully achieve the goals of this CRP. To mitigate this risk, the CRP needs to concentrate funding on a set of priorities and to actively and collectively seek additional funding for activities. Political risks. Political changes may lead policymakers or other stakeholders to view research ideas and outputs unfavorably. This risk should be mitigated by taking a long-term perspective and building long-term partnerships.The indicative scale of CRP2 is reflected in the following budget, which projects US$82 million in activity for 2011, rising to $95M in 2013. This captures costs associated with the collaboration among 11 CG centers, including IFPRI, as well as a host of global partners. Personnel and partnership costs represent 36 and 23 percent, respectively, of the total 2011 budget. As can be expected, Theme 1 comprises the majority of the budget, at $40 million or 49 percent. These ratios are fairly consistent over the three year period.As was described earlier in this proposal (see especially Section 4, Section 7 and Section 8), CRP2 will engage many partners both within and outside the CGIAR. The Lead Center, IFPRI, has historically had a higher portion of its budget devoted to partners than other centers, and has the management capacity and corporate structure to manage such relationships. As is reflected in Table 12.1, IFPRI's partnership costs as a percentage of total operating costs average 30 percent, compared with 16 percent for the CGIAR as a whole. IFPRI's research agenda is traditionally highly participatory, engaging over 200 partners annually, harnessing the expertise of CG centers, universities, local and international NGOs, and private companies. IFPRI's culture of extensive collaboration is woven into CRP2's research activities, as is evident from the budget for partnerships. Collectively, personnel and partnership resources projected for CRP2 represent 59 percent of the budget, which is consistent with the historical ratio for the CGIAR. However, partnership costs for CRP2 are proportionately higher than personnel costs when compared with the CGIAR historical trend. This is indicative of the commitment to an integrated, inclusive solution that is aligned with the Strategy and Results Framework of the CGIAR objective of strategic partnerships.Other than office space to accommodate research staff, policy research requires a relatively modest level of investment in property and equipment. Research outputs are facilitated by information and knowledge management system; thus computers and information technology and services are the primary components of capital investments supporting policy research. Table 12.1 illustrates the low capital investments for IFPRI and CRP2 compared with the CGIAR, which includes centers that conduct research requiring significant investment in infrastructure, laboratories, and vehicles. One of the pillars of the CGIAR reform process is to provide greater assurance of longer term and sustainable funding. Donors contributing to the new Trust Fund are encouraged to contribute to Window 1 (unrestricted funding) to maximize coordination and harmonization. While donors are strongly encouraged to channel their resources through the fund, bilateral funding continues. In cases where such funding is provided, it should be consistent with the agreed Strategy and Results Framework. The accompanying financial projections assume that current bilateral funding will gradually be replaced by grants through the Fund. Thus, in 2011, US$30M, or 37 percent of total funding, is assumed to be from the Fund, and broadly in line with the current systemwide ratio of unrestricted to restricted (bilateral projects). In 2013, the ratio of CGIAR Fund income is projected to be $63M, or 66 percent of total funding.The \"rate of shift\" is not possible to predict with any degree of accuracy. IFPRI, as designated Lead Center for the CRP, has assembled the costs necessary to do the work, but cannot be expected to predict with great accuracy the delineation of funding sources between Consortium Windows and bilateral funding sources.Table 12.2 shows the total costs by theme for the period 2011 to 2013. Once the overall CRP has been approved, the Budget proposals for 2012 have to be further refined to ensure the full cost recovery principles embodied in CGIAR Financial Guideline Number 5 are effectively made operational. As Lead Center, IFPRI has operated project based full costing principles for many years. The partner centers are committed to following these principles and identifying the appropriate cost drivers.Detailed Budgets for 2012 are in the process of being developed and will be evaluated by the Planning and Management Committee in October 2011 to ensure that the CRP and the individual participating centers achieve budget harmony for 2012.Budget figures are stated at conservative levels and do not include upside or overly optimistic estimates. First year budgets are based largely on financial data from each center's medium-term plan (MTP) on a full cost-recovery basis. Years following the base year show a modest cost increase of 7 percent in 2012 and 8 percent in 2013. Given the demand from stakeholders and donors, the budget illustrates a clear and achievable transition to a CGIAR Research Program financing structure that supports a rapid deployment of CRP2 in 2011.The accompanying tables provide a breakdown of costs on an overall program basis and also by the three main research themes: (1) Effective Policies and Strategic Investments, (2) Inclusive Governance and Institutions, and (3) Linking Small Producers to Markets. As described in Section 4, these main themes are further broken down by subtheme; however, for ease of presentation, Table 12.3 is limited to the theme level. Note: Under CRP3, many activities will be relevant to most commodities; the examples above are illustrative.Targeting agricultural research based on overlay of crop importance and MDG indicators Targeting agricultural research at subnational level using dynamic models Assessing commodity situations and outlooks based on trend analysis Priority-setting based on rates of return of investments and impacts using economic surplus analysis, at the global and regional levels The Harvest Choice program develops an enhanced and interlinked set of data and quantitative tools, which include spatial databases, detailed mapping of food-system characteristics and human welfare, and a detailed characterization of the impacts of changes and uncertainty in the state of natural resources on global food systems The Harvest Choice program develops a wide range of policy options and possible technological and institutional interventions that can be tailored to fit the specific regional, national, or subnational problems, issues, or opportunities that are identified Updated and expanded quantitative information on capacity and investment trends in national, regional, and global agricultural R&D that is widely accessible for improved decisionmaking and further analysis (ASTI Initiative) Establish and operate the African Growth and Development Policy Modeling consortium (AGRODEP) with the objective of creating a world-class modeling community in Africa Assessment of the contributions of multilateral trade agreements and rules to efficient global food and agricultural markets and benefits for the world's poor Priorities of public investment for promoting rural growth and reducing poverty are assessed, and the role of governance in public investment is better understood Assessment and documentation of the regional effects of multilateral trade policies and rules, and of the contributions of regional trade agreements to efficient food and agricultural markets and benefits for the poor Greater understanding of the heterogeneous demands of smallholders for infrastructure and institutions, and the importance of their complementarities in the development of rural markets Analysis of country development strategies including general equilibrium analyses of trade and exchange-rate policies (Country Strategy Support Programs) Analysis of implications of alternative rural and urban focused development strategies Develop enhanced rural water quality management options Develop policy options for reform of investments in irrigation water systems Development of enhanced tools for the valuation of ecosystem services related to water Impacts of land management practices on poverty and sustainability of the resource base assessed, and synergies or tradeoffs evaluated The role, implementation, and impact of different approaches to promoting SLM and the potential for synergies among different approaches evaluated Assess the role of crop genetic resource management as a tool to increase the resilience of producers to biotic and abiotic constraints Analyze the constraints to the access and delivery of improved seeds to small farmers: from intellectual property rights to seed systems Adoption and socioeconomic impacts of transgenic crops: guiding methods and policies to maximize the potential of biotechnologies for the poor Research, new knowledge, and information for biosafety policy development and regulatory decisionmaking in the Program for Biosafety Systems (PBS) Regional and subregional models and initiatives for biosafety policies and procedures in Africa and Asia developed under the PBS program Innovations developed in research designs and analytical methods for evaluations of policies and programs to provide social protection, reduce poverty, and improve human capital of the poor Increased understanding of the impacts and impact pathways-in the short, medium, and long termof alternative social protection interventions to increase human capital and promote sustainable poverty reduction, food security, and nutrition improvement Increased understanding of the impacts of shocks on poverty, food security, and human capital, and innovations in social protection interventions that can best respond to new conditions, for different regions and demographic groups in the short and long term. Shocks emphasized in this research include HIV and AIDS, rising food prices, and climate Improved understanding of how social protection policy processes, institutions, and program operations affect intervention outcomes, and development of methods for studying these factors ","tokenCount":"57361"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0157051768.json b/data/part_2/0157051768.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f44456b958150fd267447231bd6aae91b7c0b3da --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0157051768.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"85f65aba086592a6b3ae229bb0e4f02b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/77886f2d-6d06-4d76-8f24-904bb2e3b845/retrieve","id":"1457934904"},"keywords":["Adaptation","forage legumes","livestock production","soil degradation"],"sieverID":"064c35ec-f9fb-4e7d-8f33-3b1efad5ff56","pagecount":"1","content":"Climate vulnerability is affecting livestock production in the tropics. In addition, poor management practices such as overgrazing, overstocking and deforestation are converting livestock production in one of the main drivers of soil degradation, resulting in expansion of the agriculture frontier looking for fertile lands. An alternative to reverse soil degradation is the use of improved forages (i.e., legumes and grasses) with the ability to grow in degraded soils and recuperate them rapidly.Aiming at evaluating the agronomic performance of hebaceous forage legumes under the conditions of Patía Valley-Cauca/Colombia, four species were stablished under dry subhumid climate and low fertility soils of various stages of degradation. The species tested were: Canavalia brasiliensis CIAT 17009, Centrosema molle CIAT 15160, Stylosanthes guianensis CIAT 11995 and Desmodium heterocarpon CIAT 13651. Previous studies have shown a broad adaptation of these species to marginal/ stressed environments and the production of high nutritious forage. As control a naturalized forage grass was included (Dichanthium aristatum). The field sites were cleared using glyphosate (Roundup TM 1.5 L ha -1 ) and fertilised with P, K, Mg and S (22, 41.5, 20 and 20 kg ha -1 ). Legumes were sown in 2016 at three locations with different levels of degradation (high to low) Piedra Sentada, Mercaderes and Patía, under the following conditions: average rainfall 1616 mm year -1 mean temperature 32 • C, at an altitude of 800 m asl for Mercaderes and 500 m asl for the two other sites. A complete randomised block design with 3 repetitions was used. Each plot was 100 m 2 with a sowing density per hectare of 25 kg for C. brasiliensis, 2 kg for C. molle, 3 kg for S. guianensis and 1 kg for D. heterocarpon. Once established (2017), forage dry matter productivity (DM ton/ha/42 days) was assessed in the wet season. Results showed that S. guianensis hat the highest productivity at all 3 locations (3.2, 2.2 and 4.8 DM ton/ha/42 Day, respectively) compared to C. brasiliensis (2.1, 0.8, 3.9), D. heterocarpon (3.0, 2.2, 1.8) and C. molle (2.5, 1.6, 2.6 respectively). Productivity during the dry season will be measured to valuate performance under drought conditions, anticipating a higher drought tolerance of the deep rooted legumes.","tokenCount":"365"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0166266165.json b/data/part_2/0166266165.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f4e60f53d875b71fd2b5061ed6fbb133be8026f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0166266165.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e307710bd4812100618eeda83d3d840d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/a882582f-9ab4-4414-84cf-f3b8622eeeba/retrieve","id":"-986319044"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"81704a17-708b-4a08-99e2-31ce45803f81","pagecount":"7","content":"Climate security pathways in GUATEMALA -The diagram shows the relationships between drivers of the Climate Security Nexus identified through 4 qualitative and quantitative analyses (Climate Security Pathway Analysis, Network Analysis, Econometric Analysis, and Social Learning Theory). Specific drivers are either analyzed qualitatively quantitatively or both . The grey box shows the contextual factors, while the black box highlights socioeconomic and political vulnerabilities that also play a role in these pathways. Direct relationship Indirect relationship Quantitative analysis Qualitative analysisGuatemala is considered to be one of the most exposed and vulnerable countries in Latin America to climate variability and extreme weather events, as well as non-climatic natural events. It is also a primary hotspot for climate change, as it is highly exposed to extreme weather events like tropical storms and droughts and has low capacity to cope with these impacts.While Guatemala is an upper-middle income country, poverty and inequality rates are among the highest in Latin America, particularly affecting indigenous peoples, women, rural populations, and those employed in the informal sector.The country also faces high levels of violence and insecurity mostly related to gang violence and organized crime. It is geographically situated in the middle of a drug-smuggling route from South to North America where there has been an increase in violence linked to drug trafficking, micro-trafficking, extorsion and money laundering activities. Conflicts over natural resourcesmainly water, forest, and agricultural land and disputes related to extractive industries-commonly occur across the national territory, often involving indigenous communities.The Climate Security Observatory is an evidence-based decision support tool helping researchers, policy makers and other practitioners working at the intersection of climate, peace and security to understand and respond to climaterelated security risks.We are using a mixed-method approach to give answers to four lead questions:HOW does climate worsen the root causes of conflict?WHERE are the most vulnerable areas to climate induced insecurities and risks? WHO are the vulnerable groups to climate and security risks that should be targeted? WHAT needs to be done to break the cycle between climate and conflict? The following pathways represent mechanisms for how Guatemala's climate security nexus might operate:Climate change is negatively impacting on water, land, and food systems in the country, further degrading the country's natural resources, which is already affected by overexploitation over land and water resources, deforestation and slash and burn subsistence agricultural practices. The combination of climatic and non-climatic factors undermine the access and availability to natural resources, which increase the risk of competition over diminishing resources and may lead to tensions and conflicts. This is further compounded by socio-economic and environmental factors such as environmental degradation, poverty, marginalization, and insecure and irregular land tenure arrangements.The effects of climate change negatively impact agricultural productivity, particularly affecting vulnerable communities dependent on rain-fed subsistence agriculture, contributing to increased food and livelihood insecurity. This may heighten migration dynamics either towards urban areas or abroad, sometimes exposing migrants to various human security risks. The lack of alternative forms of livelihood may also lead to increased involvement in illicit activities and gang recruitment, indirectly contributing to the growth of organized criminal networks.• Climate risks and socioeconomic vulnerabilities are highly interconnected in Guatemala.• Heat stress is affecting net primary production of agriculture, which is closely related to resource exploitation, socio-economic inequality, and undernutrition, while water availability affects agricultural areas.• Evidence points to lower education levels being associated with higher undernutrition rates, and this also correlates with heat and drought events, illustrating how climate extremes affect Guatemala's most vulnerable populations.• Inequalities such as healthcare accessibility, agricultural indicators and female education levels are linked to conflict.• Departments in the country with a 12 month above-average temperature have 31% higher food insecurity incidence rates. A 1% increase in temperature-induced food insecurity in turn increases violent crime risks by 15.3%. i• The network analysis found strong correlations between flooding events and crime, extreme weather events and social unrest, and disasters and crime.i The model results suggest that other, unobserved factors may have a significant mediating effects within the above average temperature anomalies and violent crime relationship.Maya Chortí, populations in La Lima, Chiquimula An increase in intensity and frequency of tropical storms and heatwaves, alongside mid-summer droughts, have had a profound impact on soil erosion and fertility. According to reports, these climate impacts have reduced agricultural productivity in the region, including increasing the risk of crop losses and decreasing yields. This in turn has led to more of a dependence on the nearby communal forest, which has long been the stage of inter-communal conflicts over access to the forest with the neighbouring Shupá community. It has also increased the population's dependency on seasonal migration, most commonly to coffee plantations both within Guatemala and across the border in Honduras. However, due to increased demand over short-term employment in coffee plantations, as well as the effects of coffee leaf rust over productivity, an increasing number of farmers are forced to find alternative sources of income during the dry periods, mainly migrating to sugarcane plantations to the southwest of Guatemala or to the main urban centres in search of work. This has increased the risk of theft and assault, as well as harsh labour conditions. Lastly, climate impacts have increased agricultural land and water scarcity, which in turn has led to land-based conflicts linked to insecure land tenure arrangements.The increase in frequency and intensity of precipitation in the rainy season and flooding is leading to a loss of harvest and livestock in Tenedores. Coordinated efforts for resilience building have established an early warning and response system, however this has been largely responsive and past impacts have yet to be fully addressed. Furthermore, the unequal distribution of resilience building support by the international community is undermining social cohesion and collaborative capacities for climate adaptation. As a consequence, cattle owners are being forced to sell their cows before the rainy season, leading to a decrease in cattle market prices and profitability, while farmers are struggling to make a profit due to higher risks of crop losses and increasing prices of agricultural inputs. This is coupled with low land availability and land tenure that is highly insecure and irregular, leading to many community members depending on short-term and informal leasing agreements. This is fuelling grievances between landowners and land leasers. The high availability of alternative livelihoods such as temporal and assisted migration to Canada, sand harvesting and work in the banana plantations, have so far strengthened adaptive capacities, but there is recognition by the locals that the low levels of land availability and tenure are a potential source of conflict.El Caripintero, Chiantla Huehuetenango -Water for domestic consumption and irrigation in El Carpintero comes entirely from springs in the region, most of which were sold by the municipal government to surrounding municipalities during the last few decades to larger urban communities. This has led to the community only owning a few of the springs within El Carpintero, which are for the most part privately owned. The community reports a reduction in water flow during drier periods and the need to acquire the remaining water springs for water security. They have however, been unable to do so, in part due to a low willingness of community members to pool resources in buying the land. The scarcity of water and privatization of water springs has increased the risk of conflict between and within communities in accessing nearby water springs and, on several occasions, conflicts have already occurred with varying degrees of violence. The lack of water availability also reduces agricultural productivity and associated incomes, increasing their dependence on using irregular migration as a coping mechanism. Irregular migration however is associated with human security risks, as those on the move are more prone to assault, theft, and kidnapping.Quantitative insights:WHERE are the most vulnerable areas to climate induced insecurities and risks WHO are the vulnerable groups to climate and security risks that should be targeted?Policy frameworks: There is the need for policymakers to comprehensively and systematically integrate climate, peace, and security considerations. Possible measures include conducting a gap analysis for the integration of climate security into the policy framework of relevant sectors, and for policymakers in these sectors to be sensitized to climate change impacts. In addition, climate change-related projections and tools need to be integrated into the policy design and planning processes of peace and security actors specifically.There also needs to be more effective engagement between the different sectoral policy actors to ensure integrated policy coordination on climate security.Multilevel governance: To modify current practices for climate adaptation and peacebuilding towards integrating a climate security sensitive approach, there is the need for a community of practice for climate security in Guatemala that fosters multi-level governance approaches. Moreover, Guatemalan government actors should reflect on what existing multi-level climate policy instruments that are used to transpose national level objectives into local level realities could become vehicles through which to integrate climate, peace, and security considerations into sub-national level planning and implementation.Programmatic planning: To design and implement programmes that cover the intersection of climate change, conflict and peace, programming staff need to be sensitized to this nexus and related context-specific mechanisms, while project proposals need to integrate a climate perspective and be based on vulnerability assessments that account for conflict risks respectively.Research and evidence gaps: For a comprehensive perspective on climate, peace, and security there is a need for improving and expanding the current empirical research on this nexus. This includes expanding beyond the traditional understanding of conflict and encompassing climate security risks, incorporating indirect linkages into the analysis, as well as developing intersectional approaches, and building upon community knowledge.There is the need for investments with co-benefits for both adaptation and peacebuilding across Guatemala's hotspots for climate-related security risks. To achieve this, some options include leveraging pre-existing networks and multi-stakeholder platforms to support the development, implementation, and scaling of financial interventions and enhancing organizations' grant writing and fundraising skills. Furthermore, identifying existing climate finance instruments at the national level that could be targeted for improved conflict-sensitivity is likely to facilitate the emergence of more conflict-sensitive and peace responsive funding.WHAT needs to be done to break the cycle between climate and conflict?Participatory workshops held in El Carpintero, Tenedores, and Lima uncovered resilience building local solutions based on collective action that contribute towards sustainable peacebuilding.To avoid inter-community conflicts surrounding access to water resources, practical solutions were identified such as strengthening the role of water-related committees within community governance to foster engagement with local populations and to increase the capacity for conflict management.An integrated and collaborative water management approach with access to climate information systems was also proposed for active participation at the department-level through the Agro-Climatic Technical Committees, where participants can exchange climate-relevant information such as on climate adaptation practices and climate change developments.Secondly, to address territorial conflicts over forest resources, a proposal emerged for the use of forest management as a mechanism for conflict management. Mandating the community with developing and updating a management plan, along with monitoring and enforcing regulations and sanctions could potentially strengthen state-society relations and generate a sense of interdependence and a shared identity over the forest, as well as create employment opportunities for those involved in forest management. In addition, to reduce dependence on seasonal and rural-urban migration, which are associated with insecurity risks and hardship, participants proposed the establishment of an association of local coffee producers and a coffee cooperative to strengthen coffee production within the community, thereby potentially generating employment opportunities.Lastly, to address low access to land, insecure tenure and land-based conflicts that are exacerbated by climate impacts on the agricultural sector, one of the proposed solutions was to create a local farmer's association that would focus on finding alternative arrangements between herders and farmers that increase a secure access to land, which would incentivize farmers to adopt agricultural conservation practices. This would protect livelihoods of both farmers and herders, and open up previously unavailable land, hence potentially reducing the risk of land-based conflicts. Collective action to strengthen market access could potentially also lead to supply chain arrangements that better protect local livelihoods, by organising direct access to local wholesale centres, rather than through individual intermediaries. This could also reduce competition and drop agricultural prices.","tokenCount":"2019"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0182889878.json b/data/part_2/0182889878.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6a11c335c1c25657342a43d2573e24fb42d1616e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0182889878.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":null,"keywords":null,"sieverID":"09b4f3f7-b29c-423b-babc-9e6fe2cc30be","pagecount":"0","content":"Atlas de Yorito y Sulaco, Yoro (Honduras) \nNúmero de Cabezas de Ganado Bovino \npor Aldeas, Vorito y Sulaco \n\".O!,ld mlllm \nlQCQ ·1001 \nUmlm 1St aldtn \nf'.Wme,o d. e.b.ZII:I bow \n11 . 153 \n· 44; \n- 780 \n· 1091 \nEn la subregión un 33% de las explotaciones \ntenían ganado bovino. De aproximadamente \n9,741 cabezas de ganado casi el 83% se \nconcentraba en las zonas bajas. El 64% del \nhato se criaba en el municipio de Sulaco, de \néste las aldeas de San Juan (32%) y Sulaco \n(25%) concentraban el 57% del hato. En el \nmunicipio de Yorito , el hato se concentraba en \nlas aldeas de El Destino (29%), Yorito (24%) y \nLuquigue (23%). El 70% de los productores \nde la subregión tenían un sistema de \nganadería de doble propósito. \nA-26 AneKOS \nProductores que Utilizaban Semilla \nMejorada por Aldea, Vorito y Sulaco \nAllrtud rmIf'1m \n1000 ·1001 \nrI Lfmll86 di aldNQ \nSiñil'1II m.jortlOl. ('r.) \n, 0-0.8 \n----, 0 .8·5.3 \n5.3 - 11 .7 \n11.7 - 252 \nLos diferentes sistemas de producción de la \nsubregión se caracterizan por utilizar un bajo \nporcentaje de semilla mejorada. En 1993, de \n2500 productores, de la subregión, solamente el \n6.5% utilizaron semilla mejorada. Entre los \nmunicipios, el 7.5% en Yorito y 5.5% de los \nproductores de S ulaco. Nó \ntese en el mapa que las aldeas de las zonas \naltas presentan porcentajes de cero a un \nnúmero cercano a cero en el uso de semilla \nmejorada, en cambio las zonas oscuras, parte \nbaja, presentan algún porcentaje de \nproductores con ésta tecnologi \na. En el caso de Sulaco, la aldea de Sulaco de \n210 productores un 23% y El Desmonte de 196 \nun 12% y en Yorito, se destacaban las aldeas de \nYorito donde de 155 un 25% y en Jalapa de 68 \nun 9% de productores usaron semillas \nmejoradas. \nNota: Estas figuras no representan datos \noficiales. Los límites de aldeas son para fines \nde capacitación. \nAtlas-cJe Yorita y Su/aco, Yoro (Honduras) \nProductores que Usan Fertilizantes \nQuímicos por Aldea, Yorito y Sulaco \nEntre los insumas qUlmlcos se destacan los \nfertilizantes como urea, fósforo, potasio, magnesio \nentre otros; y herbicidas y/o insecticidas. El uso de \ninsumas químicos en los diferentes sistemas de \nproducción de la subregión se tiene como una \nvariable determinante para el incremento de los \nrendimientos. Sin embargo, en 1993, sólo un 12% \nde los productores de la subregión utilizaron \nfertilizantes químicos, un 11 % en Yorito y 13% en \nSulaco. Como se puede apreciar en el mapa, en \nYorito se destacan las aldeas de El Destino (30%), \nYorito (28%), Jalapa (21%) y Luquigue (18%); yen \nSulaco sobresalen las aldeas de Sulaco (30%), El \nDesmonte (1 0%) Y San Antonio (10%). Es de notar \nque si queremos identificar productores con \nagricultura orgánica el mapa muestra que las \nzonas altas casi no usaban fertilizantes quimicos. \nAnexos \nProductores que Usaban Tracción \nMecánica por Aldea, Yorito y Sulaco \nEl uso de tracción agrícola está muy relacionada \na las condiciones topográficas del país y la \nsubregión de Yo rito y Sulaco. Esta variable \npermite identificar en la zona ,,1 nivel de \ndesarrollo de los sistemas de producción y de la \ninversión de capital en su sector agropecuario. \nEn 1993, en la subregión un 16% de los \nproductores utilizaban tracción mecánica para \npreparar la tierra y cosechar los diferentes \nproductos agrícolas. En el municipio de Sulaco, \nel 48% de los productores de la aldea de Sulaco \nreportaron el uso de tractores agrícolas en sus \ncultivos, asimismo el 19 y 15 por ciento en El \nJaral y El Desmonte, respectivamente. En el \nmunicipio de Yorito, el 64% de los productores de \nEl Destino, 26% en Luquigue y 24% en Yorito \nhacían uso de la tracción mecánica para sus \nactividades agrícolas. \nNota: Estas figuras no representan datos \noficiales. Los limiles de aldeas son para fines \nde capacitación . \nA·27 \nAt/as de Yorlto y Su/aco, Yoro (Honduras) \nCaracterización Socioeconómica \nLas c aracterísticos demog ráf icas y \neconómicas de una población nos don una \nradiografío de un país. Indicadores sobre bajos \nniveles de ingresos y de bienestar de los familias \nimplican dificultades pero distribuir los recursos \n01 desarrOllO económico. En esto situación \nlosas crecientes de población y concentración \nde lo mismo en algunos áreas tendrían como \nresultado uno mayor presión sobre los recursos \ndisponibles. Mayores efectos se visualizon en \naquellos recursos. como bosques y suelos, con \nmayor fragilidad. Es así que uno creciente \npoblación con lo fatta de un ordenamiento de \nlOS recursos y un alto desempleo impactarán \nfuertemente en el manejo de los recursos \nnaturales. \nA-28 Anexos \nPoblación al año 2000 por Aldeas de \nYorito y Sulaco \nMIIud rtWIl11 \n1000. t OO'l -.­.n \nLa población es la variable fundamental en el \ndesarrollo de un país. Su crecimiento deberia \nestar en correspondencia con el crecimiento \neconómico. En la subregión la población crece \na una tasa anual de 2.9%. Las lasas más altas \nse registraban en las zonas altas. En este \nmapa los colores más oscuros muestran las \naldeas que concentran un mayor número de \nhabitantes dentro de cada municipio. \nNota: Estas figuras no representan datos \noficiales. Los limites de aldeas son para fines \nde capacitación. \nAtlas de Yorito y Sulaeo, Yoro (Honduras) \nHabitantes en Aldeas de Yorito y \nSulaco \nLa demanda de recursos y la presión sobre los \nmismos están en función de la densidad de \npoblación. El Destino y Yorito presentan \ndensidades mayores a 100 habitantes por km', \nen el municipio de Yorito; para Sulaco, estas \ndensidades se presentan en Sulaco y El \nDesmonte. Estas comunidades se encuentran \nen la zona baja, zonas que está \nn expulsando población hacia las zonas altas, \nsobre la cual se está dando una presión sobre la \nfrontera agricola. A ésta están llegando \nproductores con poca o sin tierra y ganaderos \ncon sistemas de ganadería extensiva. \nAnexos \nFamilias Dedicadas a la Agricultura , \nYo rito y Sulaco \nEn este mapa se muestran los porcentajes de \nfamilias por cada comunidad dedicadas a las \nactividades agrícolas. Esta variable permite \nidentificar los sitios hacia donde deberían \nenfocarse los programas de desarrollo dentro \nde la subregión. Programas agrícolas tendrían \nuna mayor cobertura entre productores de la \nparte alta . Las zonas bajas requerirían de una \ncombinación de programas agrícolas y de \nservicios. \nNota: Estas figuras no representan datos \noficiales. Los límites de aldeas son para fines \nde capacitación. \nA-29 \nAtlas de Yorito y Sulaco, Yoro (Honduras) \nFamilias sin Tierra por Aldeas en Yorito \ny Sulaco \nÉste mapa evidencia las comunidades que a \ntravés del tiempo han ido quedando sin tierra \nagrícola, y donde hoy, ésta es bastante escasa. \nTambién se podría identificar fácilmente, hacia \ndo nde prob ableme nte están o estará \nn emigrando estas familias sin tierras en \nbúsqueda de tierras agrícolas. Es evidente que \néste proceso podría estar provocando una \nexpansión de la frontera agrícola, situación que \nafectaría la cantidad y calidad de los recursos \nnaturales de la subregión. \nDistribución de fincas por Estrato en \nYorito y Sulaco \n• , _o. \n'- . \n.'. \n..,j •• \" \n. \" \n---., • • < \nEstudios preliminares basándose en datos \ncensales de 1993 indican que en el municipio \nde Yorito, las comunidades de Santa Marta , \nPueblo Viejo, La Esperanza y El Portillo \npueden no estar satisfaciendo sus \nnecesidades de maíz. Situación similar \npodría estar sucediendo en la comunidad de \nLa Albardilla en el municipal de Sulaco (ver \ncomunidades coloreadas en rojo). Además, \nestas aldeas con demanda insatisfecha de \nmaíz se encuentran ubicadas por encima de \nlos 900 m.s.n.m. Las comunidades con \ndemanda satisfecha de maíz se encuentran \ncoloreadas en amarillo y anaranjado y se \nubican en la zona baja de la subregión. \nNota: Estas figuras no representan datos \noficiales. Los limites de aldeas son para fines \nde capaci tación . \nAtlas de Yorlto Y Sulaeo, Yoro (Honduf'lls) \nDemanda Satisfecha e Insatisfecha de \nMaíz a Nivel de Aldea en Torito y \nSulaco \nt:J Lifnit.~ , 'deas \n¡ ilnd\" de malz. ,%) \n-$<1 •• 3-1 \n· 3 •. , .. .., \n60 · 321 \nEstudios preliminares basándose en datos \ncensales de 1993 indican que en el municipio de \nYorito, las comunidades de Santa Marta, Pueblo \nViejo, La Esperanza y El Portillo pueden no estar \nsatisfaciendo sus necesidades de maiz. Situación \nsimilar podria estar sucediendo en la comunidad \nde La Albardilla en el municipio de Sulaco (ver \ncomunidades coloreadas en rojo). Además, estas \naldeas con demanda insatisfecha de maiz se \nencuentran ubicadas por encima de los 900 \nmetros sobre el nivel del mar. Las comunidades \ncon demanda satisfecha de maiz se encuentran \ncoloreadas en amarillo y anaranjado y se ubican \nen la zona baja de la subregión. \nAnexos \nDemanda Satisfecha e Insatisfecha de \nFrijol a Nivel de Aldea en Yorito y \nSulaco \nlimite aldeas \nLl~ma,nda de mjlll ¡%) \n_ .78 .. 52 \n. -52··29 \nn·29·30 \nI 130 - 110 ,.*, \nEn relación a la demanda satisfecha o insatisfecha \ncon frijol , en el mapa se puede notar que las \ncomunidades coloreadas en amarillo si estaban \nsatisfaciendo su demanda de frijol. Entre estas \ncomunidades se encontraban Santa Marta, La \nEsperanza, Pueblo Viejo, Vallecillos y El Portillo \nubicadas en la parte alta del municipio de Yorito; en \ncambio también en la zona alta La Albardilla era la \núnica aldea de Sulaco que satisfacia su demanda \nde frijol. Es claro que en éste caso las \ncomunidades de las zonas bajas teni \nan menores ventajas comparativas para la \nproducción de frijol; situación que se presentó a la \ninversa en relación a maiz. \nA·31 \nAtlas de Yorito y Su/aeo, Yoro (Honduras) \nApoyo a la Toma de Decisiones \nIdentificar y combinar diferentes factores \nbiofisicos, socioeconómicos y demográficos, \npermiten establecer los criterios que faciliten y \napoyen la toma de decisiones tanto a nivel local, \nregional , o nacional. Asimismo, establecer \nacuerdos entre pobladores de diferentes \ncomunidades que identifiquen características \ncomunes o problemas acerca del manejo de \ncultivos, agua, entre otros, relacionado al \nmanejo de los recursos naturales. \nA-32 Anexos \nMaiz y Altitud en la Subregión de Yorito y \nSulaco \nEste mapa muestra las aldeas que podrían \ntener ventaja comparativa para la producción \nde maíz. Sin embargo mostraban rendimientos \npor debajo de las 2 tm por ha. Esto era debido \nal bajo uso de semilla mejorada y fertilizantes. \nDos recomendaciones se podrían sugerir: (1) \nincrementar los rendimientos incorporando \nvariedades de trópico bajo con el objetivo de \nincrementar los volúmenes de producción \ndestinados al mercado; (2) mejorar la \nproducción en las zonas altas incorporando \nmateriales de altura, el objetivo sería mejorar la \nautosuficiencia alimentaria con maíz en estas \ncomunidades. \nNota: Estas figuras no representan datos \noficiales. Los límites de aldeas son para fines \nde capacítación. \nAtlas de Yarita y Su/aea, Yaro (Honduras) \nFrijol y Altitud en la Subregión de \nYorito y Sulaco \nEste mapa muestra las aldeas que podrían \ntener ventaja comparativa para la producción \nde frijol. No obstante sus bajos rendimientos \nhace que el incremento de los volúmenes de \nproducción se hagan a expensas de la \nexpansión de la frontera agrícola. Una \nrecomendación pertinente sería empoderar a \nlos productores con semillas mejoradas y, un \nuso apropiado de fertilizantes a fin de \nincrementar producción estabilizando áreas en \nproducción. \nAnexos \nDominios de Recomendación para Maiz \nde Primera en la Subregión de Yo rito y \nSulaco (Expresado en días a floración \nmasculina) \n01eSJ*. t \n1300 unidmes 1M \n(b-.M 50C opem. 34 -c \n. 81- 7Q \n. 71 - 90 \n. 81 - 90 \n• ¡¡JI _100 \n\"01-120 \nEste mapa muestra un ejemplo de como se \npodrían determinar dominios de recomendación \npara el cultivo de maíz. Las zonas a colores \nilustran los dias a fioración masculina de un \ngenotipo de maíz tropical. \nNota: Estas figuras no representan datos \noficiales. Los limites de aldeas son para fines \nde capacitación. \nA-33 \n\n","tokenCount":"1931"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0194712276.json b/data/part_2/0194712276.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2d9e71e9b56f4e3ad865877d3433b415230241ec --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0194712276.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b0dbc0eecaeccc91abb22b43e0090a0d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/d9fc03fa-3836-45a2-9d85-0ab1df79de8d/retrieve","id":"2010223036"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"f333586d-0f16-400f-9769-f19d3d53ed64","pagecount":"29","content":"Plantains are starchy bananas which make up one-quarter of the total world production of bananas (Musa spp.). Unlike the sweet dessert bananas , plantains are a staple food which is fried, baked , boiled (and then sometimes pounded) or roasted , and consumed alone or together with otherfood.About 70 million people in West and Central Africa are estimated to derive more than one-quarter of their food energy requirements from plantains , making them one of the most important sources of food energy throughout the African lowland humid forest zone.In Africa, plantains are grown for home consumption, not for export. The area between the lowlands of Guinea and Liberia in West Africa and the central basin of Zaire in Central Africa produces one-half the total world output of plantains (figure 1). West Africa produces two-thirds and Central Africa one-fifth of the African output. In term s of cost per hectare , per ton and per unit of food energy , plantains are also the cheapest staple crop to produce.Bearing plants (figure 2) consist of :(a) Bunch or inflorescence. Composed of many flowers, the bunch emerges between the leaves and is attached to the plant by a rachis or fruit stalk. The many protuberances on the rachis are called glomerules. Each glomerule bears a group of flowers, also called a hand. Edible fruit (o r fingers) develop from female flowers located at the first 10 glomerules of the bunch. Neutral flowers (also called hermaphrodite or intermediate flowers ) appear next but do not develop into fruit as their ovaries cannot swell to form pulp. The purple bud at the end of the bunch is called the \"male bud\" and consists of bracts covering groups of so-called male flowers . This male bud may be absent or present when the bunch reaches maturity.(b) Pseudostem with foliage leaves. The cylindrical structure rising from the soil and carrying the foliage is not a stem in the true sense. It is a \"false\" stem or pseudostem because the growing tip (or meristem) of the plant remains near soil level. As the false stem consists of overlapping leaf sheaths, (c) Underground corm with suckers and roots. The corm , sometimes wrongly called a bulb, is the true stem of the plant.Numerous roots emerge from the corm, most of which grow horizontally at a depth of 0 to 15 cm. Roots are whitish if young and healthy and become brown with age. If infested by nematodes, they become brown or even black and/or show protuberances.The growing tip (or meristem) at the top of •the corm continuously forms new leaves and later becomes the inflorescenc e. The corm produces many branches, called suckers, and the whole unit is often referred to as the \"mat\" or \"stool\". After the plant crop has been harvested, the mother plant is cut down and the suckers are thinned. Although all suckers are followers or daughter plants , the cultivator selects one (the ratoon) to continue the next cyde of production. Th e second harvest from the plantain mat is call ed the first ratoon crop. The third harvest is the second ratoon crop , and so on.At least 116 plantain cultivars have been identified in West and Central Africa. Plant size and bunch type are the most important characteristics for production purposes.Plant size depends on the number of leaves produced before flowering: giant more than 38 fo liage leaves ; medium between 32 and 38 foliage leaves ; small fewer than 32 foliage leaves. When the plantains flower, leaf production has ended.Bunch morphology provides another method of classifica• tion (figure 2): French plantains: bunch is complete at matu rity . Many hands consist of numerous , rather smal l fingers fo llowed by the bunch axis cove red with neutral flowers and male flowers; the male bud is large and persistent. False Horn plantains: bunch is incomplete with no male bud at maturity. Hands consist of large fingers followed by a few neutral flowers . Horn plantains: bunch is incomplete at maturity. Handsare few in number and consist of a few but very large fingers. Th ere are no neutral flowers or male bud ; a tailor a de• formed glomeru le terminates the bunch axis . The Horn plantain resembles the False Horn but it has no neutral flowers and has larger fin gers.Several types of conventional planting material exist: peeper: a small sucker emerging from the soil (fig ure 3) ; sword sucker: a large sucker with lanceo lated leaves (fig• ure 3) , the best conventional planting material ; maiden sucker: a large sucker with foliage leaves; bits: pieces of a chopped corm.A new and most promising planting material consists of in vitro plants which are smal l maiden suckers produced from meristem culture (figure 4).Planting material can be collected from: (a) An existing fi eld , preferably an old field which is becom• ing unproductive. Otherwise damage to the roots may be (b) A multiplication plot, which is planted only for the production of suckers and not to produce bunches. Plant density (2 m x 2 m) is much higher than in production fields and suckers are obtained by either decapitation or false decapitation . Both methods consist of removing the growing point (figure 5). In the fi rst method , the pseudostem is removed to get to the growing point. On ly a small ho le or window is cut for the second method. The foliage can remain active for up to 3 months after the removal of the meristem by the second method. (c) A tissue cu lture laboratory, where in vitro plants which look like small maiden suckers are produced from meristems . In vitro plants are healthy , vigorous , free from pests and diseases (figure 4) and have a great future.Plantains , like other bananas. require a hot and hum id environment. Ideally, the average air temperature should be about 30°C and rainfall at least 1 00 mm per month. Rainfall should be we ll distributed throughout the year and dry seasons should be as short as possible. Irrigation is not suitable nor economically worthwhile for plantains grown by the fami ly farmer. but may become necessary when larger fields are cu ltivated in areas with a long dry season.Organic matter is essential for plantain cu ltivation (figure 6). External sources of mulch can consist of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) , which is rich in potassium , or c• cassava peelings , wood shavings , palm bunch refuse, dried weeds, kitchen refuse, and so on. Collecting and transporting mu lch are expensive in time and labor. The most co nvenient source consists of plants growing inside the plantain fields if they produce a great deal of organic matter without competing with the plantains.Su itable mu lch mOlterial can be obtained from trees which were slashed when the fields were cleared and which are growing again (figure 7); or from a deep-rooted legu me shrub cal led Flemingia congesta or F. macrophylla (figu re 8). F. congesta is seed drilled in the midd le of the 3 m plantain alley. It can be difficult to establ ish, but from the second year onwards it grows vigorously. It can reach a height of approximately 2.5 to 3 m if left unpruned, but in the field it is cut back 4 times a year to a height of about 1.5 m (figure 8). The prunings are spread overthe soil. Flemingia is not fertilized as it benefits from fixed nitrogen and leached fertilizers appli ed to the plantains. Grass growing between the plantains is not suitable as a mulch source because it competes with the plantains.The plantain crop always benefits from the use of fertilizer (table 1). The yield from fertilized plants can be up to 10 times higher than that from unfertilized plants. The amount of fertilizer needed depends on soil fertility and so il type. General recommendations cannot be made as these should be based on soi l or leaf analysis and the results of fertilizer experiments. Since potassium and nitrogen are eas ily leached, they shou ld always be applied at regu lar intervals (split applications) during the growing (rainy) season. Other important nutrients are phosphate , calcium and magnesium which are provided in one application. In some exceptional cases, micro-nutrients (for example, zinc or sulfur) have to be applied. Weeds can be hand-pulled orchemicallycontrolled . Paraquat and simazine are appropriate herbicides since they control the weeds without affecting the plantains , unless leaves are accidentally sprayed . Glyphosate, diu ron and gramuron are not recommended as they can be phytotoxic to plantains.Black sig atoka is the major disease attacking plantains; nematodes and stemborers are the major pests.Black sigatoka is a leaf spot disease (figure 9a-d Fougamou 1 (cooking banana)Nematode damage green leaves at maturity (9d) . Photosynthesis is reduced and small bunches (sometimes with undeveloped fingers) are produced. Yield losses are estimated at between 30 and 50 percent.Black sigatoka can be controlled with aerial applications of fungicides belonging to the groups ofthe benomyl , benzimidazoles, chlorothalonils, dithiocarbamates, flusilazoles , imazaliles , imidazoles, methylthiophanates, nuarimols, prochloraz, propiconazoles , triazoles and tridemorph , or soi lapplied fungicides such as triadimefon and triadimenol. In any case , at least two types of fungicide should be used alternately to preventthe fungus from developing resistance to the active ingredient.Plantain cu ltivars resistant to black sigatoka provide the only effective means of control since the fungicides are very expensive and can pose health hazards when applied in backyards. Breeding for resi stance began at the Onne station of the International Institute of Tropical Agricu lture (IITA) in Nigeria du ring 1988. For the time being , cooking bananas (\" Fougamou 1 \", \"Bom\", \"Gia Hui \", \"Foulah 4\" and \"Nzizi\") are available from IITA (figure 10) as a substitute for plantain. These varieties are resistantto black sigatoka and can be prepared and consumed in the same ways as plantains.Nematodes are minute worms which live in the soi l and infest plant roots. Several types of nematodes can extensive ly damage the plantain root system if the land was previously cropped with plantains or if they were introduced with infected planting material (figure 11). Nematodes impair the transport of nutrients and water to the main stem , causing a reduction in yie ld and weaken ing of the plant. As a result, many plants may be lost through tip-over whenever winds become strong.Nematodes can be controlled by applying nematicides in a circle , 25 cm in diameter, around the plant. The stemborer or banana weevil Cosmopolites sordidus (figure 12) lays its eggs near the corm of the main plant. The larvae attack the underground part of the plant, feeding on I ,..,. Stem borer trap from a piece of pseudostem the corm and boring channels in it (figure 13). Plants become very weak, especially during the dry season , and tip over. Yield can be drastically reduced.Stem borers can be controlled by leaving the land under fallow, by the application of coffee husks and by insecticides. The cost of insecticides should determine whether they should be used. The use of traps provides an alternative method for controlling banana weevils which is cheap but time-consuming and not as effective as the use of insecticides. Traps are made by cutting pseudostems in half longitudinally and laying the pieces cut side down on the soil near the plantains (figure 14). One trap for every 20 to 30 plants is the current practice . Traps should be inspected daily early in the morning. The adult black weevils are then retrieved from between the soil and the cut surface of the pseudostem and killed. Traps remain effective for about 1 or 2 weeks and are renewed at harvest when an ample supply of pieces of pseudQstem is available.A field that becomes unproductive should be left fallow when the plantain mats have been destroyed . Good results can be obtained with the use of kerosene , glyphosate or 2-4 0 but the plantain mats can only be completely destroyed by hand. This ensures that no live material remains to harbor pests and reinfect the field .To restore fertility , the organic matter in the soil should be raised as high as possible during the fallow period by planting an improved fallow (for example , a leguminous cover crop). Otherwise the fallow crop can consist of trees which were cut down at planting time and are growing back or of Flemingia congesta which was grown between the plantain rows as a source of mulch. In addition to restoring fertility, the fallow crop should by itself completely eliminate all kinds of weeds , especially grasses. A grass fallow is not suitable as grass easily grows again and becomes a noxious weed.Compound garden with plantains 12Most plantains produced in West Africa come from compound gardens or backyards inside villages (figure 15). Backyard soil is very rich in organic matter and nutrients from household refuse which is dumped there. Such gardens.are permanently in use for plantains which grow there luxuriantly, become very large and produce heavy bunches. They grow in groups or clusters as each bearing plant produces many suckers which are not pruned out. Human activity is limited to manuring, propping and harvesting.Since the demand and thus the price for this crop are continuously increasing, many farmers want to grow more plantains in orderto raise their income. However, backyards cannot be readily extended since they are enclosed by houses or fences. The only way, therefore, to expand production is to grow plantains in fields at some distance from the village. In most cases such field-grown plantains are very poorly maintained. The result is a very modest yield from the first year onwards. Different methods of cultivation should accompany the change in site to achieve and sustain high-level yields for several years.The site should be easily accessible, especially if the establishment of a large field is being planned. It should be well drained but not too steeply sloped. Plantain cultivation is impossible if the land becomes flooded from time to time, or has a water table at a depth of only 50 cm or less. The soil should be rich in organic matter (black soil). Hence fields in a long natural fallow, under an improved established fallow or with a lot of mulch are recommended.Fields are to be prepared with minimum disturbance to the soil (no-tillage farming). In consequence, manual clearing should be preferred to mechanical deforestation because bulldozers always remove topsoil with the important organic matter and compact the remaining soil. When an old natural fallow is cleared , the debris from the forest should be burned if plantain cultivation is planned for 1 or 2 cycles only. If perennial CUltivation is being considered, planting should be done through the mulch (figure 16). Young fallows of about 3 to 5 years or improved legume fallows should be simply slashed and left without being burned. Trees must be cut but the stumps are not to be removed , and the trees should be left to grow again (figure 7). They can be pruned only when they start to obstruct field activities or shade the plantains.Once the fallow crop is slashed, the field is ready for pegging. Drains should be dug if some spots in the field tend to waterlog after heavy rains. The recommended spacing is 3 m between the plantain rows and 2 m within the row (in other words . 3 m x 2 m). An alternative is 2.5 m x 2.5 m. If spaced 3 m x 2 m, 1 hectare should contain 1667 plants , but with a spacing of 2.5 m x 2.5 m, it should contain 1600 plants . Rows shou ld be straight in flat fields to give plants the maximum amount of sunlight. However, on sloping land , rows should follow the contour lines in order to decrease soil erosion.For fie ld cultivation, medium plantains should be preferred to giant ones even though giant plantains produce heavier bunches. Giant plantains take longer to produce and are more likely to be damaged by strong winds because of their size.The decision whether to grow a French (figure 17a) or a False Horn (figure 17b) plantain cu ltivar should depend on which type the consumers prefer. Horn plantains (figure 17c) should never be CU ltivated as their yield is very low .Suckers are separated from their mother plant with a spade or machete . The sucker corm must not be damaged or chipped. Consequently the corm should be careful ly peeled with a machete. The pseudostem of the suckers should be cut off a few centimeters above the corm (figure 18). Peeling of the corm de lays the development of nematode infestation, whi le cutting of the pseudostem reduces bu lkiness and improves early growth of the newly planted sucker.fThe peeling process is just like that for cassava. A freshly peeled healthy corm ought to look white , but corms infected by stemborers and nematodes show brown and black spots which have to be removed until on ly white tissue remains. If the infestation is severe, with many brown and black spots, the sucker shou ld be destroyed. Sucker preparation (peeling) is carried out in the field where the planting material is collected . This is to avoid contamination of the new field with roots infested with nematodes or corms with stem borers. Prepared corms are transported to their destination where they are left to dry for a few days (not in the sun). Suckers have to be planted within t week. Storage of suckers for more than 2 weeks will adversely affect future yields.Suckers are planted immediately after field preparation. Plant holes are prepared with a minimum size of about 30 cm x 30 cm x 30 cm. Care should be taken to separate the topsoil from bottom soil. The sucker is placed in the hole and its corm is covered , first with the topsoil and th' en with the bottom soi l (figure (9) . In the plant hole, the side of the sucker corm which was formerly attached to the corm of its mother plant is placed against the wall of the hole. The opposite side of the sucker' corm is placed towards the middle of the plant hole , where the so il is loose (figure (9). The best sucker (the future ratoon) will emerge at the side opposite to where the planted sucker was previously attached to the mother plant. If the land is sloping, the sucker shou ld be so oriented that its follower will emerge against the slope. That will delay the development of the so-called highAn unprepared sucker (left) and peeled suckers (right) ready for planting Plantains can be planted throughout the rainy season. However, they should grow vigorously and without stress during the first 3 to 4 months after planting, and therefore they should not be planted during the last months of the rainy season. Planting with the first rains seems agronomically sound but not financially advantageous. Most farmers will plant at the onset of the rains, causing the market to be flooded with bunches 9 to 12 months after planting, when prices will be very low. Planting in the midd le of the rainy season is a better proposition as plantains wi ll then be produced off-season and get high prices.Organic matter is essential for plantain cu ltivation (table 1, page 6) if the field is to be very productive for a long time. A high leve l of organic matter in the soi l is beneficial because it stimulates root development, improves soil drainage, decreases soil temperature fluctuations, and increases soil porosity and biological life.Organic matter decays under the influence of microorganisms in the soil , heavy rainfall and high soil temperature. The amount of organic matter will gradually decrease once the field has been cleared and cause a decrease in yield. Therefore newly established plantains which receive only fertilizer will produce a high yield only in the first year. In the second year the yield will drop because the organic matter will have decomposed (figure 20 and table 1). To compensate for this continuous decrease in the amount of organic matter, the field needs mulch from plants and/or manure from animals. There are many sources of mulch. It can be either carried into the field or produced between the plants; but to be effective , it should cover the soil completely (figure 21 ). Once the field is mulched, weeds are controlled and the topsoil is protected against heavy rainfall and intense sunshine. Poultry, pigs and cows produce suitable manure which is applied only at the base of the mat.To produce a heavy bunch , plantains always need some extra nutrients. These can be applied in the form either of inorganic fertilizers or organic fertilizers (mulch , manure or ash from wood fires). Inorganic fertilizers have the advantages of easy handling and concentrated nutrients. Organic fertilizers are very bulky, yet they manifest many important characteristics. They improve soil moisture retention , weed and erosion control, soil porosity and biological activity. The application of fertilizer should start 1 month after planting of plantains or with the first rains in an already existing fie ld. The fertilizer is applied around the main plant in a circle about 50 cm in diameter. Fertilizer is not worked into the soil as that causes extensive damage to the superficial root system. No fertilizer is applied in the dry season.Plantains should always be weed-free . Weed control starts during field preparation. Weeds are initially controlled about every 6 to 8 weeks ; but when the plantain canopy closes , about 5 to 6 months after planting, weed infestation declines due to shading . Any plant with a superficial root system shou ld be considered a weed and therefore eliminated. Grasses or herbs are the most pernicious weeds because they derive their nutrients from the same level of the soil as the plantains. Tree seedlings are not considered to be weeds.Weeds can be controlled through mulching , chemically or manually . Mulching is the most efficient means , because a mulch layer can impede or prevent weed growth. Chemical control is expensive and in some circumstances also dangerous. Manual weeding is not recommended, although the weeds are thereby effectively controlled, because slashing or hoe weeding inevitably damages the plantain root system . However, sometimes manual weeding is the only possible method .Plantain fields are arranged in rows spaced 3 m x 2 m. As the canopy closes only some 5 to 6 months after planting, a fair amount of inter-row space remains un exploited during the first months. This space can be used for plants which have a short life cycle and which do not compete with plantains. Groundnut, yam , cocoyam (figure 22) and maize are su itable intercrops alth ough maize effectively delays the plantain harvest by about 2 months. Cassava and cowpea are not suitable , because their yields are reduced under the shade of plantain rows . Plantains can be used as a shade crop for young cocoa and coffee plants.The heavy weight of the plantain bunch bends all bearing plants and can cause doubling (pseudostem breaks) , snapoff (corm breaks , leaving a part in the ground) or uprooting , also called tip-over (the entire corm with roots comes out of the ground). Plants are generally weak during the dry season and strong winds , nematodes and stemborers also increase the rate of loss . For these re asons , bearing plants always need support from 1 or 2 wooden props , usually made of bamboo (figure 23). If a piece of bamboo is used, the support is placed alongside the bearing plant and the top of the plant is tied to the bamboo. A lateral branch at the top of the bamboo prop sometimes forms a natural fork which can be used to support the plantain without being tied to it. When 2 pieces of bamboo are used, the bunch and not the plant is supported in the first place. The bamboo props are crossed and form a fork. This fork is tied together with a rope and placed just underneath the bunch.The bearing plant is cut and the bunch, 3 to 4 months old, is harvested when 1 or 2 fingertips of the first hand start yellowing . The bunch usually then ripens within a week. Care has to be taken that the bunch does not drop on the ground when the main plant is cut. The whole of the pseudostem and foliage of the. main plant is then chopped (figure 24) and spread overthe soil as a mu lch for the ratoon crop. If this is not done, weevi ls may live and multiply on the intact pseudostem.Unlike those of most other bananas , plantain suckers develop very slowly. After harvest, all suckers start to grow at the same time and most have to be eliminated to stop competition (figure 25). The tallest is left to guarantee the follow up and maintain the density. Thinning usually has to be repeated a month later, as new suckers will have emerged by that time . Suckers are thinned with a machete . The sucker pseudostem is cut off near its corm and the point of the machete is twisted in the growing tip , thus killing it.After production of several ratoon crops , the upper surface of corms in aging plantain fields can be seen above soil level. The exposure of the corm s, which is call ed high mat (figure 26) , is believed to have several causes. The nature of ratooning in plantains seems to be particularly important. High mat exposes the roots which dry out. The plants become weak and tip over easi ly because they are no longer firmly based in the soil. Earthing up (adding so il around th e plant) does not help much . Howeve r, mulch protects the roots which would otherwise dry out and improves the ' ram ification and stability of the plants .A field which becomes unproductive should be left fa llow. If plantains are to be planted again after a fallow period , the following points shou ld be considered .• At the beginning of the fa ll ow, all plantain mats should be entirely destroyed. Otherwise , remain ing plants cou ld maintain nematode and stembore r popu lations which wou ld readily infest newly planted plantains after the fa llow period .• Only manual destruction guarantees the complete elimination of the existing plantain mats.• The level of organic matter in the soil should be raised as high as possible during the fallow period in order to restore fertility. This can be done by allowing trees to regrow andlor by planting a legume cover crop .• The fallow period should last at least 2 to 3 years. \"C: degrees Celsius, Centigrade 2,4 D: a herbicide aldicarbe: an insecticide anchorage: stabi lity of plantains in the soi l backyard : compound garden banana weevil : an insect that damages the plantain corm benomyl : a fungicide benzimidazole: a fungicide bits: pieces of chopped corm used in planting black sigatoka: severe leaf spot disease of plantains and bananas \" 80m \": a variety of cooking banana resistant to black sigatoka bottom soil: soil from the bottom of a hole dug for planting bract: a purple modified leaf covering a flower cluster breeding : plant improvement canopy : cover formed by leaves carbofuran: a nematicide and insecticide chlordecone : an insecticide chlorothalonil: a fungicide cm: centimeter contour line: a line connecting the points on a land surface that have th e same elevation cooking bananas: starchy bananas which have to be cooked corm : th e (underground) stem of a plantain or banana wh ich produces suckers and roots Cosmopolites sordidus: see banana weevil cultivar: cu ltivated variety daughter plant: sucker succeeding the bearing plant decapitation: the process of eliminating the growing tip after cutting the pseudostem ; used in sucker multiplication dithiocarbamate: a fungicide diuron: a herbicide doubling: breaking of the pseudostem drainage: the gradual disappearance of water in the soi l earthing up: heaping soil in mounds at the base of the main plant ethoprophos : a nematicide fallow : previously cu ltivated land that is allowed to lie idle, usually in order to re-. cover its fertility false decapitation: the process of elim inatin g the growing tip after an opening (a window) has been made in the base of the pseudostem ; used in sucker mu ltiplication. See also decapitation False Horn plantains: plantains with an incomp lete inflorescence at maturity; hands consisting of large fingers fo llowed by few hermaphrodite flowers, no male bud at maturity female flowers: those flowers on the bunch who se ovaries deve lop into fruit fertilizer: a chemical mixture used to supply nutrients to the soi l finger: a sing le plantain or banana fruit Flemingia congesta (F. macrophyl/a): a legume shrub used as an all ey crop in plantain fie lds; cut regularly to supp ly mulch flowering: producing flowers flusilazole: a fungicide foliage leaves: the big leaves of a plantain or banana follower: sucker, daughter plant succeeding the bearing plant \" Fougamou 1 \" , \" Foulah 4\" : varieties of cooking banana resi stant to black sigatoka French plantains: plantains with a complete inflorescence at maturity. This type has many hands consisting of many , rather small fruits fo ll owed by the inflorescence axis covered with persisting hermaphrodite flowers and male flowers; th e male bud is large and persistent fungicide: chemical used to kill fungi fungus: any of a major group of saprophytic and parasitic lower plants that lack chlorophyll and include molds , rusts and mushrooms, among others g: gram \" Gia Hui \": a variety of cooking banana resistant to black sigatoka giant plantains : tall plantains which produce more than 38 fo liage leaves before flowering glomerule : proluberance on the rachis of a bunch glyphosate: a herbicide gramuron : a herbicide hand: a cluster of fingers borne on the same glomeru le HCH: an insecticide hectare: area of land 100 m by 100 m herbicide: chemical used in killing weeds hermaphrodite flowers: interm ediate or neutral flowers which persist on the bunch but do not develop into fruit high mat: the upper portion of the corm grows o'ut of the soil , exposing a considerable area of root-bearing tissue Horn plantains: plantains with an incomplete inflorescence at maturity. This type has . few hands consistin g of few but very large fingers, no hermaphrodite flowers and no male bud imazalil: a fungicide imidazole: a fungicide inflorescence: a floral axis with clusters of flowers insecticide : chemical used in killing insects intermediate flowers: see hermaphrodile flowers in vitro plant : plant produced from a meristem and CU ltivated temporarily in a laboratory isazophos: a nematicide isofenphos : an insecticide lanceolated: tapering to a point at the top and sometimes at the base leaf sheath : the lower part of the leaf which forms the pseudostem of the plantain plant legume: a plant which fixes nitrogen from the atmosphe re by interaction with bacteria m: meter maiden sucker: a large sucker with foliage leaves male bud: the big purple termin al protuberance of the plantain bunch male flowers: flowers which are found in the male bud manure: organic mulch from animal origin; e.g. poultry manure mat: corm with suckers; stool meristem: growing tip which is found on the corm medium plantains: plantains producing between 32 and 38 fo liage leaves before flowering methylthiophanate: a fung icide micronutrient: nutrient needed in ve ry small amounts for good plant deve lopment microorganism: an organism of microscopic size ; e.g . fungus , bacterium mm: millimeter morphology: form , structure mother plant : a plantain plant with a bunch mulch: organic matter of plant origin used to . cove r soi l and improve ferti lity Musa: genus name of bananas which includes dessert bananas, cooking bananas and plantains, and their wi ld re latives . Mycosphaerel/a fijiensis: wind-borne fungus causing black sigatoka disease nematicide: chernical used in ki lling nematodes nematode: minute parasitic worm which damages plant rools neutral flowers: see hermaphrod ite flowers no-till farming : farming without soi l disturbance nuarim' ol: a fungicide \"Nzizi \" : a vari ety of cooking banana resistant to black sigatoka ovary: the basal portion of the flower which develops into a fruit in female flowe rs, but not in hermaphrodite and male flowe rs paraquat: a herbi cide peduncle: see rachis peeper: a small sucker emerg ing from the so il pegging: using pegs to mark a field or planting holes ground split application : the application of identical amounts of a substance (e.g. ferti lizer) at regular intervals stem borer: see banana weevil stool : see mat sucker : a shoot from the main plant which can develop into a bearing plant sword sucker: a large peeper with lanceolated leaves thinning : the process of eliminating all but one sucke r to avo id competition tip-over : entire corm with the roots comes out 0f the ground ton : 1000 kilograms topsoil : soil at the top or on the surface of the fie ld which is usually darker and richer in nutrients than the bottom soil underneath it triadimefon : a fungicide triadimenol : a fungicide triazole: a fungicide tridemorph : a fungicide uprooting: see tip-over waterlogging: when water remains on the fie ld after rain; this is caused by bad drainage ","tokenCount":"5614"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0195070522.json b/data/part_2/0195070522.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0f2130f4ddce8ffa99afe7e03611f572c3d71e7f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0195070522.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e5e931184488ba73f61454e4675b8bc4","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/31146eb3-1977-41ad-b55f-4e5f1931ddd6/retrieve","id":"-1186890384"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"cceec56e-f191-4148-af45-024d114bc577","pagecount":"1","content":"• Women's diet is one of the immediate determinants of maternal and child nutrition• Examine dietary intake of women with children <2 years of age • Examine inequity in dietary intake by wealth status • Assess the role of food or cash transfers in maternal diet diversity• Data came from a phone survey of 6,227 women in six states of India. • Dietary intake was assessed using the diet quality questionnaire which was then recategorized to calculate score for food diversity, consumption of healthy and unhealthy foods, and minimum diet diversity (MDD) for women. • Inequity in dietary intake was examined using wealth quintiles • Association between food and cash transfer on maternal diet was examined using multivariate regression analysis controlling for maternal, child, households' factors and state fixed effects.pf the women achieved MDD• The suboptimal diet and inequity in food consumption requires concerted actions to improve diet and narrowing of equity gaps. • More efforts are required to increase the coverage of already existing cash transfer schemes in India.• Consumption of meat, poultry and fish was lowest, 17% ","tokenCount":"179"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0196756559.json b/data/part_2/0196756559.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ea893a898614108f0dc0550f236822f72f32f850 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0196756559.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"82803fb438e6b3f3e34c30ec360a83bf","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/cef05914-3e93-4df5-9abd-d38511539eae/retrieve","id":"1742539241"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"811a5665-9b42-45e0-a2d1-00aa2540cd75","pagecount":"42","content":"La Alianza de Bioversity International y el Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) agradece a los comités municipales, a las asociaciones de productores, industrias, comercializadoras, entidades de educación, organizaciones no gubernamentales, agencias de cooperación internacional, centros de investigación, y demás actores públicos y privados que hacen parte o apoyan al gremio cacaotero del Caquetá, por su participación en la construcción del presente plan de acción que hace parte de la \"Estrategia para la sostenibilidad de la cadena de cacao en Caquetá: ruta hacia la acción climática y la construcción de paz\".El presente documento es el resultado de un trabajo participativo que deja de manifiesto la voluntad y el compromiso de los actores regionales en la búsqueda de una agricultura sostenible para la Amazonia colombiana. De este modo, este plan de acción se fundamenta en la proposición concertada de objetivos y acciones estratégicas que buscan contribuir al cierre de brechas de competitividad de la cadena y, a su vez, resaltar la importancia del cultivo del cacao en el posconflicto, como una alternativa que favorece la recuperación y conservación de los bosques en plantaciones agroforestales.La construcción de este documento fue financiada por el proyecto 18_III_106_COL_M_Estrategias productivas sostenibles, \"Implementando sistemas productivos sostenibles agrícolas y pecuarios para simultáneamente alcanzar la conservación de los bosques para la mitigación del cambio climático (REDD+) y la construcción de la paz en Colombia\", que forma parte de la Iniciativa Climática Internacional (IKI) y las iniciativas de investigación de CGIAR \"Sistemas de Innovación Agroalimentaria Resilientes en América Latina y el Caribe (AgriLAC Resiliente)\" y \"Low-Emission Food Systems (Mitigate+)\". El Ministerio Federal del Medio Ambiente, Conservación de la Naturaleza y Seguridad Nuclear (BMU, por sus siglas en alemán) apoyó esta iniciativa sobre la base de una decisión adoptada por el Bundestag alemán.Como resultado del trabajo colaborativo entre el proyecto \"Implementando sistemas productivos sostenibles agrícolas y pecuarios para simultáneamente alcanzar la conservación de los bosques para la mitigación del cambio climático (REDD+) y la construcción de la paz en Colombia\", en adelante proyecto SLUS, y las iniciativas de investigación de CGIAR \"Sistemas de Innovación Agroalimentaria Resilientes en América Latina y el Caribe (AgriLAC Resiliente)\" y \"Low-Emission Food Systems (Mitigate+)\", fue posible trabajar con los actores de la cadena del cacao del Caquetá en la estructuración de una estrategia sectorial con enfoque de sostenibilidad. Este proceso contó con la participación de 114 personas, entre ellas representantes del sector productivo, proveedores de insumos agrícolas, industrias procesadoras, comercializadores, entidades de investigación y prestadores de diversos servicios de apoyo al subsector cacaotero de la región y del país.El presente plan de acción hace parte del documento denominado \"Estrategia para la sostenibilidad de la cadena de cacao en Caquetá: ruta hacia la acción climática y la construcción de paz\", disponible en el repositorio de CGIAR. El propósito de este subdocumento es proporcionar una herramienta que facilite los ejercicios de planificación y seguimiento de las actividades planteadas por el conjunto de actores que se integran en el encadenamiento del cacao en el Departamento. De esta manera, se busca apoyar la continua construcción de una hoja de ruta, que pretende articular los intereses institucionales e individuales en la persecución de objetivos y metas comunes para abordar los actuales desafíos de la sostenibilidad.Es relevante enunciar que la estructura del plan de acción responde a la necesidad de trabajar en el cierre de brechas que alejan a la cadena del cacao del Caquetá de una competencia sostenible a nivel de región y de país. Asimismo, se enmarca en lo ordenado por la Ley 811 de 2003 para las organizaciones de cadena en lo que respecta a incluir en la planificación una visión conjunta y la formulación de estrategias para: (1) mejorar la productividad y competitividad, (2) vincular productores y empresarios al desarrollo de mercados, (3) desarrollar alianzas estratégicas, (4) fomentar el cuidado de los recursos naturales, (5) contribuir a la formación de recursos humanos, (6) promover la investigación y el desarrollo tecnológico, (7) mejorar el flujo de información y (8) reducir los costos de transacción entre eslabones.Con lo anterior, el plan de acción integra pilares de la sostenibilidad social, ambiental y económica. En lo que respecta a lo ambiental, tanto la estrategia como el plan de acción se orientan a la reducción de emisiones asociadas al uso del suelo, la conservación de los bosques y la restauración de paisajes degradados. Por último, pero no menos importante, se espera que, a través del desarrollo de acciones conjuntas, la sociedad cacaotera continúe trabajando por la construcción de paz en las zonas rurales afectadas por el conflicto armado a través del denominado cultivo de la paz. El planteamiento de una estrategia sectorial parte del diagnóstico del estado del arte de una cadena productiva, así como de la identificación de sus cuellos de botella y oportunidades de mejora, para planear acciones dirigidas a aumentar la competitividad y sostenibilidad. Esta ruta de planificación participativa requiere establecer una visión integradora que le permita a los actores proyectar el estado deseado de la cadena en un determinado período de tiempo. Para el caso de la cadena del cacao en el Caquetá, los actores establecieron la siguiente declaración de visión, con el propósito de alcanzarla en un lapso de 10 años:En 2032, el Caquetá habrá logrado incrementar las áreas establecidas con el cultivo de cacao -principalmente en sistemas agroforestales SAF -así como su productividad y la calidad del grano. Este logro se deberá al esfuerzo institucional y de los actores de la cadena de valor, para impulsar procesos de extensión rural, crear capacidades locales a través de escuelas de formación, adaptar buenas prácticas agrícolas (BPA), emplear materiales vegetales nativos o mejorados acoplados al territorio, gestionar proyectos de fomento productivo, impulsar la investigación y consolidar una cultura cacaotera.El cultivo del cacao se afirmará como una alternativa viable para la economía agrícola departamental, a la vez que habrá permitido promover la conservación y el aprovechamiento sustentable de los ecosistemas, y recuperar áreas y posturas degradadas para alcanzar la cero deforestación. Además, el cacao caqueteño será referente en el mercado nacional, habrá logrado ingresar de forma competente a mercados diferenciados e internacionales, y potenciará el desarrollo de la agroindustria cacaotera local.Es relevante enunciar que esta meta estratégica incorpora elementos de la visión 2030 establecida por los actores de la cadena en 2017, en el marco de la iniciativa Visión Amazonía del Gobierno de Colombia. No obstante, durante el proceso de su revisión participativa, se consideró importante agregar nuevos elementos y alinearla con la visión 2040 para el desarrollo agropecuario rural del Caquetá, la cual se cita a continuación:En el año 2040, el departamento del Caquetá será un territorio con arraigo e identidad amazónica, que consolida sus procesos de ordenamiento y fundamenta su desarrollo rural sobre cadenas de valor de bienes y servicios que garantizan el manejo, conservación y restauración de nuestros biomas, propiciando el aprovechamiento sustentable de los recursos naturales y oportunidades atractivas y viables que contribuyan al buen vivir de los pobladores rurales y su permanencia en el campo. (FAO & ADR, 2021, p. 115).En Colombia, la Ley 811 de 2003 establece los lineamientos para la inscripción y reconocimiento de las organizaciones de cadena del sector agropecuario, forestal, acuícola y pesquero ante el MinAgricultura. En respuesta a lo decretado en la norma, los actores de la cadena del cacao en el Caquetá han establecido los siguientes objetivos estratégicos para cada uno de los nueve aspectos especificados por el Congreso de la República (2003) (Tabla 1).Mejorar la calidad fitosanitaria del material vegetal, la capacidad competitiva de la producción departamental y el cubrimiento de los servicios de extensión rural.Desarrollo del mercado de bienes y factores de la cadena Generar capacidades locales para la búsqueda, ingreso y permanencia competitiva de la región en escenarios del mercado nacional e internacional.Disminución de los costos de transacción entre los distintos agentes de la cadena Buscar la optimización de las inversiones e ingresos de los cacaoteros en el desarrollo de modelos productivos sostenibles.Establecer alianzas institucionales que logren sinergias en recursos técnicos, humanos y financieros para el beneficio de los actores de la cadena.Coordinar la estructura de medios que faciliten la comunicación y transferencia de conocimientos entre los actores de la cadena, así como la generación de información actualizada para el subsector cacaotero.Estructurar programas que potencien la participación e inclusión de pequeños productores, mujeres, jóvenes rurales y emprendedores en la cadena productiva.Fomentar la protección de los ecosistemas donde se cultiva cacao, el uso sostenible del suelo y las prácticas sustentables del manejo del cultivo.Formación de recursos humanos Desarrollar fortalezas empresariales, técnicas y comerciales en los productores y en las organizaciones que los agremian.Impulsar el desarrollo de investigaciones y proyectos que permitan el progreso tecnológico del cultivo y la caracterización de especies nativas.Tabla 1. Objetivos estratégicos de la cadena de cacao en el Caquetá en cumplimiento de la Ley 811 de 2003 (Artículo 1).Tras definir la visión de la cadena de cacao en el Caquetá y determinar los objetivos estratégicos alineados a los nueve puntos mandatorios por la Ley 811 de 2003, se realizaron jornadas de trabajo con integrantes del comité departamental para analizar los cuellos de botella de la cadena en cada eslabón, proponer estrategias, plantear actividades que contribuyan al cierre de brechas y fijar metas. Este proceso concertado resultó en la formulación de un plan de acción (Tabla 2 a Tabla 10), el cual se presenta subdividido en función de las líneas estratégicas establecidas por mandato en la norma enunciada. Cabe mencionar que cada una de las estrategias expuestas fue articulada con el objetivo estratégico que guarda mayor relación a su alcance y propósito; sin embargo, las actividades pueden relacionarse con uno o más de los resultados esperados.Tabla 2. Plan de acción para la línea estratégica 1 -Mejora de la productividad y competitividad.Objetivo: Mejorar la calidad fitosanitaria del material vegetal, la capacidad competitiva de la producción departamental y el cubrimiento de los servicios de extensión rural.Deficiencia en la calidad del material vegetal ofertado.Fortalecer el manejo fitosanitario del material vegetal y la capacidad instalada de la oferta local.Registro de viveros y jardines clonales que proveen material vegetal.Número de viveros y jardines clonales registrados ante el ICA.Cuatro (4) viveros y cuatro (4) jardines clonales registrados ante el ICA.Validar y liberar clones adaptados a las condiciones propias de la región y a la adversidad del cambio climático.Número de clones validados y liberados.Tres (3) clones validados y liberados.Formación de productores en manejo de material vegetal.Porcentaje de productores formados.Formación de al menos el 50% de los productores de los comités municipales. Cinco (5) tecnologías desarrolladas, validadas y transferidas.Producción y poscosecha Estructurar y poner en marcha un proceso de aprendizaje con criterios unificados de extensión rural.Número de procesos de aprendizaje diseñados y en marcha.Un (1) plan de aprendizaje con enfoque de extensión diseñado y en marcha. Inadecuado manejo agronómico del cultivo de cacao.Promover el aprendizaje de técnicas de manejo productivo y la adopción de BPA tanto de capacitadores como de los cacaoteros.Capacitar y certificar competencias de los productores de cacao.Porcentaje de productores capacitados y con certificación de competencias.Al menos el 50% de los productores participan de procesos de capacitación.20% de los productores asociados a los comités certificados en competencias.• ACAMAFRUT • SENA • UNIAMAZONIAEl inadecuado manejo poscosecha en las unidades productivas impacta en la calidad del grano de cacao.Evaluar modelos de beneficio a partir de los parámetros que influyen en la calidad del grano.Identificar los principales factores de poscosecha que influyen en la calidad del grano.Un (1) documento descriptivo de los modelos de beneficio y de los factores que afectan la calidad del grano.Un (1) documento descriptivo de los modelos de beneficio y de los factores que afectan la calidad del grano.Producción y poscosecha Definir y proponer un modelo piloto de beneficio para la región.Validar la adopción de sistemas de secado tecnificados y apropiados a las condiciones climáticas de la región (p. ej., secado a gas, eléctrico).Número de sistemas de secado validados.Un (1) sistema de secado funcional adecuado a la capacidad de acopio y las condiciones de la región.Un (1) manual de operación para sistemas de secado.Objetivo: Mejorar la calidad fitosanitaria del material vegetal, la capacidad competitiva de la producción departamental y el cubrimiento de los servicios de extensión rural.Débil cultura cacaotera asociada a la baja vocación agrícola del Departamento.Promover el desarrollo de proyectos de investigación social con el objetivo de impulsar el desarrollo de la comunidad cacaotera.Identificar y documentar los factores que inciden en el desarrollo de la cultura cacaotera en el Caquetá.Un (1) documento descriptivo de los aspectos que afectan la cultura cacaotera en el Caquetá.Un (1) documento descriptivo de los aspectos que afectan la cultura cacaotera en el Caquetá.Falta de recursos necesarios para la prestación del servicio de extensión agropecuaria (entre ellos, infraestructura y equipos de técnicos y profesionales).Apoyar la gestión de recursos para mejorar la cobertura y continuidad del servicio de asistencia técnica y extensión rural a los cacaoteros.Gestionar recursos del Sistema General de Regalías (SGR) y de cooperación internacional para la atención de productores de cacao a través del servicio de extensión rural.Número de productores de cacao que han recibido asistencia técnica.2.000 usuarios atendidos. Objetivo: Generar capacidades locales para la búsqueda, ingreso y permanencia competitiva de la región en escenarios del mercado nacional e internacional.Alta intermediación en el proceso comercial e informalidad en las negociaciones.Buscar oportunidades de mercado para los diferentes tipos y calidad de cacao que se cultivan en el Departamento.Realizar acuerdos comerciales con compradores que ofrezcan precios rentables para el productor.Número de acuerdos comerciales establecidos y en marcha, entre comités y compradores.13 acuerdos, al menos un (1) acuerdo comercial por comité.Bajo nivel de conocimiento de las oportunidades de mercado.Incrementar la participación del grano de cacao del Caquetá en mercados diferenciales.A través de la marca regional.Realizar un foro departamental, con actores externos, sobre estrategias de diferenciación en el mercado de cacao sostenible.Número de foros departamentales por año.Un (1) foro departamental anual. Objetivo: Coordinar la estructura de medios que faciliten la comunicación y transferencia de conocimientos entre los actores de la cadena, así como la generación de información actualizada para el subsector cacaotero.Carencia de cifras validadas para el subsector cacaotero.Garantizar la actualización y socialización periódica de las estadísticas relacionadas con la cadena productiva del cacao del Caquetá.Caracterizar a los productores y realizar un censo cacaotero en el Caquetá; con el fin de identificar el número de productores, área de siembra, área cosechada, proyecciones de producción, edades de cultivos, asocios, entre otros.Un (1) censo cacaotero actualizado respecto a la caracterización de los productores.Un (1) censo cacaotero actualizado según la caracterización de los productores.• ACAMAFRUTActualizar cada año.Crear una plataforma regional en la que se encuentren documentos y estadísticas de relevancia para la cadena del cacao en el Caquetá.Un (1) repositorio de información regional administrado por el comité departamental.Un (1) repositorio de información regional administrado por el comité departamental.Falta de unificación de los criterios divulgados por parte de técnicos y profesionales.Realizar procesos de gestión documental para facilitar la transferencia de información entre los actores de la cadena.Construcción de un manual para el manejo sustentable del cultivo de cacao con enfoque territorial.Un (1) manual técnico para el manejo sustentable del cultivo de cacao.Un (1) manual técnico para el manejo sustentable del cultivo de cacao.Tabla 6. Plan de acción para la línea estratégica 5 -Mejora de la información entre los agentes de la cadena. Un (1) piloto con tres (3) establecimientos educativos.Pocos emprendimientos e iniciativas de agroindustria para el procesamiento del cacao de la región.Fomentar la agroindustria del cacao como una iniciativa de emprendimiento.Establecer acuerdos con instituciones, empresas y expertos, para el desarrollo de capacidades en la transformación del cacao.Número de acuerdos establecidos.Al menos cinco (5) acuerdos que beneficien a seis (6) agroindustrias.Ejecutar programas de fortalecimiento a la agroindustria cacaotera departamental. La participación de la mujer en los procesos de toma de decisiones es minoritaria.Promover el desarrollo de proyectos productivos y empresariales con enfoque de género.Ejecutar un proyecto que involucre la participación de mujeres en temas de siembra, transformación y comercialización del cacao.Porcentaje de mujeres de los comités que participan de proyectos en la cadena del cacao. 80% de las mujeres de los comités han participado en al menos un (1) proyecto. Objetivo: Fomentar la protección de los ecosistemas donde se cultiva cacao, el uso sostenible del suelo y las prácticas sustentables del manejo del cultivo.Baja adopción de los sistemas de producción adaptados a las condiciones de la región y al cambio climático.Fomentar la implementación de prácticas sustentables durante el establecimiento y desarrollo del cultivo del cacao.Identificar las prácticas sostenibles más adecuadas a las condiciones del Departamento y que den respuesta a los requisitos del mercado.Un (1) estudio de identificación de prácticas sostenibles en función de las condiciones del Caquetá.Un (1) estudio de identificación de prácticas sostenibles en función de las condiciones del Caquetá.Producción y poscosecha Modelar los impactos potenciales de la variabilidad y el cambio climático sobre el cultivo del cacao.Un (1) estudio de impactos de la variabilidad y el cambio climático en el cultivo de cacao.Un (1) estudio de impactos de la variabilidad y el cambio climático en el cultivo de cacao.Desarrollo del cultivo de cacao en zonas no aptas.Contribuir al fomento del uso sostenible del suelo en el Departamento.Establecer lineamientos de política pública para el fomento del cultivo de cacao en zonas aptas.Número de documentos de política pública departamental.Un (1) documento técnico y un (1) acto administrativo aprobado por la Asamblea Departamental, para establecer un lineamiento de política pública. Puesta en marcha de procesos continuos de fortalecimiento de capacidades organizacionales.Número de procesos de fortalecimiento organizacional en marcha.Porcentaje de comités con capacidades organizacionales fortalecidas.Un (1) plan de formación en marcha en el marco del PDEA.80% de los comités con capacidades fortalecidas.Fortalecer las unidades de negocio de los comités o de las asociaciones de productores de cacao.Número de organizaciones con unidades de negocio adicional.Cuatro (4) comités con unidades de negocio adicionales.• ACAMAFRUT • Red Nacional CacaoteraDébil estructura comercial de los comités.Crear capacidades comerciales en las juntas directivas de los comités.Poner en marcha un programa de formación comercial que incluya encuentros, talleres, capacitaciones, entre otras.Número de juntas directivas que participan de programas de formación comercial.13 juntas directivas que participen de un programa de formación comercial.• ACAMAFRUT Desde la perspectiva ambiental, la línea estratégica denominada \"Manejo de recursos naturales y medio ambiente\" comprende, en su objetivo y actividades de planificación, la identificación de prácticas sostenibles para el establecimiento y desarrollo del cultivo en función de las condiciones edafoclimáticas del Caquetá. Esta consideración incluye la evaluación de los posibles impactos del cambio climático sobre la producción del grano y viceversa, con el fin de valorar alternativas de adaptación y mitigación además de las proyecciones del subsector.Asimismo, busca mitigar impactos negativos de la instalación de cultivos en zonas de baja aptitud, mediante la gestión ambiental del suelo y la influencia en las políticas locales. Por último, comprende procesos de reforestación con el fin de mejorar la estructura arbórea a la vez que se ejerce una actividad agrícola sustentable. Cabe agregar que, en una menor proporción, la sostenibilidad ambiental de la actividad productiva también se encuentra relacionada con actividades de las líneas estratégicas 1 y 5 del plan de acción (Figura 1).Figura 1. Actividades del plan de acción relacionadas con la promoción de prácticas sostenibles en el cultivo del cacao.Pilares de la sostenibilidad ¿Qué buscan las prácticas agrícolas sostenibles?Uso eficiente de los recursos naturales Mejora de la productividad y competitividadReducción del impacto de la agricultura en el medio ambienteValidación y liberación de clones adaptados al cambio climático. Procesos de aprendizaje en BPA y transferencia tecnológica. Gestión de asistencia técnica y extensión rural.Mejora de información entre los agentes de la cadenaManual para manejo sustentable del cultivo con enfoque territorial. . Paquetes tecnológicos con prácticas de sostenibilidad ambiental por tipo de sistema productivo.Manejo de recursos naturales y medio ambiente ","tokenCount":"3270"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0218201570.json b/data/part_2/0218201570.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d933209413d43b48ca451be8dd286dcf2a47375d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0218201570.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"240e757f704d95e01c1b8c0355aba755","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/8b68aa0f-6fc6-4412-9e71-aa59dae8d761/content","id":"919798461"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"6bac0002-2f64-45a3-a493-3c5eaab9b2af","pagecount":"8","content":"Stem borers are major insect pests of maize in Uganda. A study was conducted in 2014-2016 to assess the performance of Bt hybrids expressing Cry1Ab (event MON810) against the two major stem borer species in Ugandathe African stem borer (Busseola fusca) and the spotted stem borer (Chilo partellus) -under artificial infestation. The study comprised 14 non-commercialized hybrids, including seven pairs of Bt and non-Bt hybrids (isolines), three non-Bt commercial hybrids and a conventional stem borer resistant check. All stem borer damage parameters (leaf damage, number of internodes tunneled and tunnel length) were generally significantly lower in Bt hybrids than in their isolines, the conventionally resistant hybrid, and local commercial hybrids. Mean yields were significantly higher by 29.4-80.5% in the Bt hybrids than in the other three categories of non-Bt hybrids. This study demonstrated that Bt maize expressing Cry1Ab protects against leaf damage and can limit entry of stem borers into the stems of maize plants, resulting in higher yield than in the non-transgenic hybrids. Thus, Bt maize has potential to contribute to the overall management package of stem borers in Uganda.Stem borers are some of the main insect pests of maize in Uganda. The four major stem borer species are the spotted stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe), the African stem borer Busseola fusca (Fuller), the sugarcane borer Eldana saccharina (Walker), and the pink stem borer Sesamia calamistis (Hampson). Busseola fusca and C. partellus are the two most widely distributed and dominant species in Uganda (Matama-Kauma et al., 2007;Molo et al., 2014). The larvae of stem borers feed on the plant whorl and tunnel stems leading to the death of growing shoots (Ampofo et, 1986). In Kenya, stem borers were reported to cause losses ranging from 10 to 100% (De Groote et al., 2002;Ong'amo et al., 2006;Seshu Reddy, 1990). Furthermore, in Kenya, total losses to stem borers were valued at USD 25 and USD 59.8 million in 1999 and 2000, respectively (De Groote et al., 2002). In Uganda, yield losses due to stem borers were estimated at 23.5% in 2015 (Wamatsembe et al., 2017). Stem borer damage on maize ears predisposes the grain to pre-harvest infestations by storage insect pests and mycotoxins (Njeru et al., 2020;Opoku et al., 2019). Mycotoxins, including aflatoxins, pose a serious health threat to humans and livestock and are associated with liver cancer, stunted growth in children, and immune disorders (Wu, 2014); these health risks make aflatoxin-contaminated maize grain unsuitable for food and feed.Cropping system, chemical, cultural, biological, and host plant resistance are used to control stem borers in maize (Khan et al., 1997;Ndemah et al., 2007;Schulthess et al., 1997). The push-pull technology is one of the cropping systems that are effective in controlling stem borers. However, it is poorly adopted by smallholder farmers because it is knowledge-and labor-intensive. In addition, limited availability and high cost of Desmodium seed, a key component of the technology, limits its uptake (Mukebezi, 2008). Spraying with insecticides only protects against early infestations, but not against stem borers feeding inside the ears and stems (Jotwani, 1983). In addition, insecticide use is not cost-effective in smallholder systems and may expose farmers to health and environmental risks. Biological control agents of stem borers have been introduced and released into farmers' fields but they take long to establish and only provide partial control (Bonhof et al., 1997;Bruce et al., 2009;Schulthess et al., 1997;Zhou et al., 2001). Many farmers have therefore resorted to using insecticides or not controlling stem borers at all. Although host plant resistance is safe and averts the need for farmers to purchase and apply insecticides, not a single stem borer resistant maize variety has been released and commercialized in Uganda, despite the existence of conventional stemborer resistant maize germplasm (CIMMYT, 1993;KEPHIS, 2022). In Kenya, 13 stem borer tolerant/resistant varieties have so far been released (KEPHIS, 2022).Transgenic plants expressing toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) with resistance to different groups of insects have been developed by genetically engineering (Koziel et al., 1993;Vaeck et al., 1988). Transgenic Bt maize can help to control several species of Lepidopteran stem borers, e.g. Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) (Magg et al., 2001), S. calamistis (Van Den Berg and Van Wyk, 2007), Sesamia nonagrioides (Lefèbvre) (Farinós et al., 2011), B. fusca and C. partellus (Tefera et al., 2016;Tende et al., 2010). The Bt toxin Cry1Ab included in event MON810 was deregulated and commercialized in the United States in 1996. It has also been approved for importation and cultivation in many countries in Latin America, Asia, and Europe (ISAAA, 2017). Farmers in South Africa started growing MON810 maize hybrids in 1998 (Kruger et al., 2012), and later Bt11 (also Cry1Ab) and MON89034 (Cry1A.105 + Cry2Ab2) were approved for control of stem borers in 2003and 2010, respectively (De Buck et al., 2016). In Egypt, MON810 was approved for cultivation in 2008 (Sawahel, 2008). To date, Bt maize has not been approved for commercial use in Uganda.No studies have been conducted on the effectiveness of Bt maize in controlling stem borers in Uganda, yet the expression and efficacy of Cry1Ab protein can vary with environmental conditions and farming systems/practice (Nguyen and Jehle, 2007;Székács et al., 2010;Trtikova et al., 2015). There are also known Cry1Ab resistant strains of B. fusca in South Africa (Campagne et al., 2013). The present study was conducted for three seasons under the supervision of the Uganda National Biosafety Committee (NBC) to generate empirical information to inform decision making on application for approval of Bt maize cultivation in Uganda. The performance of the Bt maize event MON810 in controlling two stem borer species (C. partellus and B. fusca) under artificial infestation was evaluated in confined field trials (CFTs) using different maize genotypes.The experiments were conducted in confined field trials (CFTs) following the national guidelines (UNCST, 2006). One CFT site was located at the National Crops Resources Research Institute (NaCRRI), Namulonge, Wakiso district (0.525931, 32.622453), and the other in Mubuku irrigation and settlement scheme in Kasese district (0.20845, 30.12483) NaCRRI oversees maize research in Uganda and was, therefore, chosen because of the existing technical and physical resources, including a well-developed CFT village required for the study. The Institute is 27 km north of Kampala, on the Kampala-Gayaza-Zirobwe road. The rainfall pattern at NaCRRI is bi-modal with peaks in April and October. Average rainfall ranges from 900 mm to 1,200 mm per annum.Mubuku irrigation scheme in Kasese was chosen because it hosts one of the largest and oldest CFT sites in the country and has a welldeveloped irrigation system for off-season planting. Mubuku lies at an altitude of about 1,007 m asl, with a mean annual temperature and rainfall of 27.8 • C and 750 mm, respectively.Genotypes in the field trials included seven Bt hybrids (maize hybrids with event MON810 expressing insecticidal Cry1Ab protein) and seven of their corresponding non-transgenic near-isogenic hybrids (isolines). The isolines are non-GM hybrids from inbred lines with genetic background identical to those of their corresponding GM lines. Three commercial non-transgenic maize varieties sourced from seed companies (East African Seeds, Farm Input Care Centre and Nalweyo Seed Company) in Kampala and a conventionally bred B. fusca and C. partellus resistant hybrid from CIMMYT (Munyiri et al., 2013) were also used (Table 1). The Bt hybrids and isolines were sourced from Monsanto Company (now Bayer).The experiments were conducted from 2014 to 2016. Chilo partellus trials were planted at NaCRRI on January 6, 2014and December 19, 2014and harvested on May 25, 2014and May 11, 2015, Hybrid 14 -Isoline more abundant in the western mid altitude farmlands and Semeliki flats (Kasese) and Lake Victoria Crescent (Wakiso), respectively (Molo et al., 2014), and the presence of well-developed CFTs. In order to provide temporal isolation, the planting times were chosen to coincide with a period when most other maize crops in the vicinity were almost mature. This, in addition to implementing spatial isolation, was meant to avoid pollen exchange between Bt and non-Bt maize. The trials were planted in an alpha lattice experimental design, nine entries by two blocks, with four replications. There were two-row plots per entry. Two seeds were planted per hill in a row of 5 m length and thinned to one seedling per hill at two weeks after emergence. This made a total of 21 plants per row. The inter-and intra-row plant spacing was 75 cm and 25 cm, respectively, giving a population of 53,333 plants ha‾ 1 . Standard rates of fertilizers were applied (125 kg N and 125 kg P 2 O 5 ha‾ 1 ). Top dressing was done using urea in two splits. Supplemental irrigation was applied when needed. The fields were kept weed-free by hand weeding. The non-infested plants in each row were protected with Bulldock® 25 EC (Beta-cyfluthrin), but data were not collected from the sprayed plants.The rearing of C. partellus and B. fusca followed methods of Tefera et al. (2016). The stem borers were reared in an insectary at NaCRRI from field-collected populations of the stem borers. To ensure that neonates were alive at the time of infestation, both eggs and larvae were handled carefully to ensure maximal survival. The eggs were collected, surface sterilized using formaldehyde, and dried on filter paper as described by Tefera et al. (2016). The collected eggs were then kept under room temperature (26 ± 2 • C) for 4-5 days to develop into the blackhead stage. The eggs were then monitored for 1-2 days, within which period they hatched and were used for infestation. Where the number of neonates was low, further development of the emerged neonates was delayed by subjecting them to a temperature of 4 • C until enough neonates were recovered for infestation.Five plants, from the second to sixth plant in each row (10 plants per plot), were infested with 10 neonates of the target stemborer species (C. partellus at NaCRRI and B. fusca in Kasese), starting at about three weeks after the emergence of maize plants and repeated at weekly intervals. A total of three infestations was used for C. partellus. For the B. fusca experiment, the infestation was done four times because the required number of neonates could not be obtained; infestations used for B. fusca were 10, 3, 6 and 10 neonates per plant for the first, second, third and fourth infestations, respectively.A camel-hair brush was used to transfer the neonates into the young maize whorls. Only active neonates were used to infest the maize plants between 8:30 a.m. and 12:00 p.m., and 4:00 p.m.-5:30 p.m. to avoid exposing the neonates to harsh sunny conditions, which could lead to desiccation. The neonates were placed directly into the cooler and concealed maize whorls.Data on stem borer damage were collected on the leaves, internodes and stems (tunnel length) of maize. Leaf damage by stem borers was assessed by scoring each infested plant on a scale of 1-9 (where 1 = no visible damage and 9 = completely damaged) (Tefera et al., 2011). Scores of leaf damage were taken three times fortnightly beginning at two weeks after infestation. At harvest, the 10 infested plants were stripped off the leaves and assessed for stem damage. The number of stem borer exit holes per plant and the number of tunneled internodes were counted and recorded. The stalks were then split open to record the tunnel length, the number of larvae and number of pupae.To determine grain yield, only the infested plants (10 plants per plot) were harvested. The ears from the harvested plants were weighed separately and their respective moisture content was determined from a sample of grain. The yield was then converted to grain yield per hectare, assuming 80% shelling percentage and adjusted for moisture content at 13.5% using the formula below:Dry grain weight (kg) = Field weight* (100 − % Field MC) 86.5Where MC = Moisture content.The means of the different data parameters were calculated for each experimental unit in Microsoft Excel. Before analysis, all data were checked for the assumption of normality and homogeneity of variance using GenStat (International, n.d.). The number of exit holes and internodes tunneled, as well as tunnel lengths, were not normally distributed and were, therefore, transformed using square root transformation since they all had several zero counts and measurements. All data were analyzed using ANOVA, with contrasts for pairwise comparison between Bt and their non-Bt isolines. Similarly, we used ANOVA with contrasts for comparing the Bt hybrids, non-Bt Isolines, resistant check, and commercial checks. The means were compared using multiple comparison tests using Fisher's LSD method. All statistical analyses were done using GenStat V12.1.3338 (International, n.d.). Untransformed data are presented in the results.There were significant differences between Bt-and isolines in leaf damage in both seasons for C. partellus (Table 2). Mean leaf damage scores were significantly lower in all Bt hybrids when compared with their isolines. Mean leaf damage ranged from 1 to 1.4 in Bt hybrids and from 4.6 (entry 10) to 6.1 (entry 14) in isolines. Similar trends were observed for B. fusca in leaf damage for both Bt-and isolines (Table 2). Busseola fusca leaf damaged score ranged from 1.7 to 1.9 in Bt hybrids, and from 3 to 3.5 in isolines. The number of exit holes followed as similar pattern as leaf damage, being significantly lower in all Bt hybrids 1.9 ± 0.10a Hybrid 10 -Isoline 4.6 ± 0.46b 5.5 ± 0.17b 5.1 ± 0.28b 3.2 ± 0.24b Hybrid 11 -MON810 1.0 ± 0.02a 1.0 ± 0.03a 1.0 ± 0.02a 1.9 ± 0.08a Hybrid 12 -Isoline 4.9 ± 0.21b 5.5 ± 0.29b 5. Entries with odd numbers have Bt genes and those with even numbers do not have the Bt gene (isolines). Each pair of means within a column followed by different letters are significantly different.than in the isolines in the two C. partellus plantings, and in six of the seven Bt/isoline combinations (Table 3). Hybrids 8 and 12 recorded the highest exit holes in both seasons of infestation with C. partellus. Similarly, significant differences were observed in number of internodes tunneled (Table 4) and tunnel length (Table 5). Most of the Bt hybrids were highly resistant to tunneling caused by C. partellus in both seasons. There were, however, longer tunnels recorded in B. fusca infested plants (hybrids 4, 8, 10, 14) than in C. partellus infested plants (Table 5). For grain yield, there were significant differences between Bt-hybrids and isolines under both C. partellus and B. fusca infestation (Table 6). All Bt hybrids had greater yields than isolines in the C. partellus infested experiments. Among the C. partellus infested hybrids, hybrids 3, 5 and 7 had the highest yield (8.5-8.6 kg/ha) in the first season and hybrids 1, 3, 5, 7 and 13 had the highest yields (10.5-12 kg/ha) in the second season.In the B. fusca experiment, significant differences occured between the Bt and isoline pairs in grain yield only between Bt hybrid 13 (9.1 kg/ha) and isoline 14 (7.3 kg/ha). All the other comparisons between Bt and isolines in the B. fusca infested plants were not significantly different.There were significant differences between the four sets of hybrids (Bt hybrids, isolines, resistant check and commercial checks) in leaf damage, number of exit/entry holes, number of internodes tunneled, tunnel length and grain yield (Table 7). Bt maize had the lowest leaf damage, number of exit/entry holes, internodes tunneled and tunnel length followed by the resistant check, when infested with C. partellus and B. fusca. There were no significant differences between isolines and commercial checks in leaf damage and number of exit holes in all the three trials. However, the number of internodes tunneled were significantly lower in the isolines than in the commercial check in the second trial infested with C. partellus and the one infested with B. fusca. The length of tunnels was significantly lower in isolines than in commercial checks only in the first season of infestation with C. partellus. No significant differences were observed between the two in those other plantings. Bt hybrids had the highest yield followed by the resistant check in both seasons under C. partellus infestation; however, there were no differences in grain yield between Bt hybrids and their isolines under infestation with B. fusca.The number of different stages of both species that were recovered was not analyzed to test differences between treatments as the numbers were very low (Table 8). Chilo partellus larvae were recovered in both Bt maize (hybrid 9) and two isolines (hybrids 2 and 10) in the first season planting, and only isoline 10 in the second season. Chilo partellus pupae were recovered in Bt maize (hybrid 9) in the first season and isoline 10 in the second season. Busseola fusca larvae were recovered only in the stems of isolines 4, 8, 12 and 14.In this study, we demonstrated the efficacy of MON810 maize in controlling C. partellus and B. fusca on maize in Uganda. The Bt maize (that was artificially infested with C. partellus and B. fusca showed significantly lower leaf damage, fewer exit holes, and reduced tunneling by stem borers when compared with the corresponding isolines,The number of exit holes (±SEM) of Bt hybrids and their non-Bt isolines following artificial infestation with Chilo partellus at Namulonge, Wakiso, and with Busseola fusca at Mubuku, Kasese, Uganda from 2014 to 2016 crop season.Mean Entries with odd numbers have the Bt genes and those with even numbers do not have the Bt genes (isolines). Each pair of means within a column followed by different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05 using t-tests. Entries with odd numbers have the Bt gene and those with even numbers do not have the Bt gene (isolines). Each pair of means within a column followed by different letters are significantly different.conventional resistant check, and the commercial non-transgenic reference maize varieties. As a result, the Bt maize produced significantly higher grain yield (29.4-80.5%) than the isolines and the commercial non-transgenic maize varieties. Chilo partellus larvae and pupae were recovered in isoline, resistant check, and commercial varieties, but in only one of the Bt hybrids, while B. fusca larvae and pupae were only recovered in the resistant check, isolines, and commercial varieties. Reduced stem borer damage (leaf damage, number of exit holes, and tunnel lengths) in the Bt maize as compared to the non-transgenics showed and confirmed that transgenic Bt maize (MON810) is effective against C. partellus and B. fusca. Similar results were reported in Kenya for B. fusca in the laboratory and C. partellus in CFT trials (Tefera et al., 2016;Tende et al., 2010).The high expression of Bt protein in maize leaves as reported by Nguyen and Jehle (2007) explains the success of Bt maize in managing maize stem borers. The use of different promoters in commercial Bt maize hybrids leads to differential expression of toxins in different plant tissues (Dutton et al., 2003;Van Wyk et al., 2009). The maize events MON810 and Bt11 contain the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35 S promoter, which results in toxin expression in the leaves, stem, roots, and kernels at all maize growth stages (EPA, 2001). If differences occur in Bt-toxin concentrations within a plant, control success may be compromised as is the case when larvae feed on silks and kernels with a lower toxin concentration, and later enter the stems as 3rd instars. This may lead to development up to the adult stage. Indeed, van Rensburg (2001) reported successful control of B. fusca during the vegetative stages because of high protein expression, and survival of B. fusca 1st instar larvae when fed on maize silks with lower toxin levels.Grain yields realized from MON810 Bt hybrids were higher than those of the isolines, resistant check and commercial varieties. This shows that protection from stemborer damage resulted into higher grain yield. In addition to guarding against grain yield losses, MON810 Bt maize can also limit field infections by Aspergillus spp., thereby reducing aflatoxin contamination and contributing to food safety and reducing risks caused by aflatoxins (Schulthess et al., 2002;Sétamou et al., 1998).A similar study by Kocourek and Stará (2018) on the European corn borer in the Czech Republic reported reduced damage and incidence of Fusarium species on Bt maize (MON810), with a corresponding yield advantage of 15% over the non-Bt maize. Bt crops can be a useful component of integrated pest management (IPM) systems to protect the crop from targeted pests (Mabubu et al., 2016). We observed some cases of exit holes and stem tunneling in Bt maize hybrids infested with either species of stem borers, and one pupa in Bt maize infested with C. partellus, implying incomplete control of C. partellus by Bt maize. This may be because of a window of opportunity for successful feeding and survival of later generation neonates and second instar larvae on silks, which were postulated to have a reduced concentration of the Bt toxin (van Rensburg, 2001). We also observed higher leaf damage and tunneling by B. fusca in Bt hybrids suggesting that B. fusca requires higher amount of Bt plant tissue to cause mortality. The more extensive tunneling also implies that the pest can easily develop to adulthood once it gains entry into the stem, especially that Bt maize plants were reported to have lower concentration of the toxins in the stalk (Nguyen and Jehle, 2007). The lack of complete control is not consistent with previous studies that showed 100% mortality of C. partellus (Singh et al., 2005;van Rensburg, 1998). This may be explained by observations of other authors who reported that the expression of the protein varies with plant parts, variety, environmental Entries with odd numbers have the Bt gene and those with even numbers do not have the Bt gene (isolines). Each pair of means within a column followed by different letters are significantly different. Entries with odd numbers have the Bt gene and those with even numbers do not have the Bt gene (isolines). Each pair of means within a column followed by different letters are significantly different.conditions, season, and phenology of the plant (Nguyen and Jehle, 2007;Székács et al., 2010;Trtikova et al., 2015). Adopting Bt maize could help farmers in Uganda to guard against grain yield losses associated with stem borers, thereby improving household food security, incomes, and livelihoods. Growing Bt maize would also eliminate/reduce the costs associated with the use of insecticides, and lessen the dangers to humans and the environment as a result of pesticide misuse/overuse. Sustainable use of Bt maize will, however, depend on the development of products that offer season-long protection against different strains of the pests, regulatory compliance, and product stewardship, among other requirements. Product stewardship means that everyone involved in the product life cycleinnovators, scientists, and technology usersis accountable for ensuring that the products are safe and socially and environmentally responsible (Mbabazi et al., 2020).The incursion by fall armyworm (FAW) (Spodoptera frugiperda) (JE Smith) in Africa (Goergen et al., 2016;Otim et al., 2018) is a new challenge on the continent. Originally, known to be restricted to the Americas, the FAW has become the most damaging pest of maize in Uganda, and many sub-Saharan Africa countries (Day et al., 2017;FAO, 2018). Though event MON810 offers partial control for FAW (Prasanna et al., 2018), it was not developed to control this pest. The use of maize with MON810 should be considered primarily as a tool to manage stem borers, with additional Bt events needed for more effective control of both stem borers and FAW. This should be accompanied by a comprehensive insecticide resistance management strategy that forms an integral part of Bt deployment. The evolution of dominant resistance to Cry1Ab protein in B. fusca in South Africa (Campagne et al., 2013) calls for robust resistance management strategies, including the use of integrated pest management (Campagne et al., 2013) and the use of other Bt toxins in maize with different receptors in the target insects.Our study has demonstrated that Bt maize (MON810) with Cry1Ab was effective in controlling C. partellus and B. fusca in our trials in Uganda in 2014-2016. Bt maize protected against leaf damage and limited stem borer entry into maize stems, resulting in 29.4-80.5% higher yield than in the non-transgenic hybrids. Bt maize has potential to help Ugandan maize farmers produce high-quality grain with greater yield and less reliance on insecticides, and thus enhancing food security. This study was conducted in only two locations because of regulatory requirements. Additional studies may be needed in multiple locations to capture representation from different populations of the stem borers. Such studies could be part of the testing in national performance trials for variety registration and commercialization.Michael H. Otim: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing original draft, writingreview and editingvisualization, supervision, project administration; Grace Abalo: Investigation; methodology, writingreview and editing; Godfrey Asea: Conceptualization, investigation, writing-review and editing, supervision, project administration, fund acquisition; Julius Pyton Sserumaga: Investigation, formal analysis, writingreview and editing; Simon Alibu: Investigation, writingreview and editing; Stella Adumo: Investigation, data curation, supervision, writingreview and editing; Jane Alupo: Investigation, data curation, supervision, writingreview and editing. Stephen Ochen: Investigation, data curation, Means within a column for each trial followed by different letters are significantly different. ","tokenCount":"4153"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0247230581.json b/data/part_2/0247230581.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6801d07596ff3aff2cd7910975ade2b51ff708d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0247230581.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"63032112a7cd3c9c0cbfa1615c998c09","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e23dd7ea-101b-458a-8e70-e0804fd58951/retrieve","id":"501760507"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"36a1e3d6-af9b-414f-a432-0f7b5b98b536","pagecount":"49","content":"Acknowledgements vi This synthesis report captures the strategies devised, procedures adopted and processes followed to enhance the uptake of best-bet technologies by the smallholder farmers in the laboratory countries of the CGIAR Research Program on Livestock (CRP Livestock). The report also documents the outcomes achieved by the end of 2021 and synthesizes the lessons learned during identification, selection, scaling assessment, and adoption of technologies. Considering the importance of livestock for the livelihoods of smallholder farmers in developing countries, the CRP Livestock was introduced in four selected countries (Uganda, Tanzania, Vietnam, and Ethiopia) as a laboratory to test the best-bet technology bundles and strategies for their uptake. Based on the learnings from the previous phase of the CGIAR Research Program on Livestock and Fish (CRP Livestock and Fish), the identified best-bet technologies were bundled after stakeholders' consultation to enhance the buy-in by the key livestock value chain actors and ensure their sustainable adoption. Similarly, a systematic approach was used for scaling assessment of the rolled out best-bet technologies in the project countries.The annual countries' reports, published articles of the program, workshops' reports, presentations, and other unpublished material are reviewed, consulted, and analysed to synthesize information. The areas covered include the types of technology bundles introduced in the four country projects, processes adopted and challenges faced in the integration of intervention bundles and uptake, and contribution of technology bundles in improved productivity and livelihoods of the smallholder livestock producers and keepers in the project countries. The delivery mechanisms documented best practices, and lessons learned are collated, connected, and associated to derive the final consideration and way forward for the program partners, donors and researchers.Under the umbrella of CRP Livestock, different projects have been rolled out in the selected four countries. The project in Uganda introduced an integrated intervention package for improved productivity of pigs to enhance the incomes of the pig farmers. In Tanzania, the focus is on inclusive dairy development through enhanced uptake of technology by introducing institutional approaches that involve inclusive agribusiness models for the improved livelihood of smallholders. The 'Livestock-led interventions towards equitable livelihoods and improved environment' project seeks to stimulate the system transformation to empower highland farming communities through bundled livestock-based interventions in the northwest highlands of Vietnam. The 'SmaRT-Small Ruminant value chain transformation in Ethiopia' project, on the other hand, intends to improve the livelihoods of women and men farmers in Ethiopia through consolidation, testing, and promotion of SmaRT pack at the producer level while facilitating equitable access to input supplies and services through community action and political support. Detailed information on the Ethiopia project are not included in this report. Lessons learned on the overall approach across the four priority countries can be found in Kruijssen et al. (2021).Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the implementation progress remained slower than that was planned in all four countries. The four countries have completed the selection of best-bet technology bundles. The scaling assessment of some of the introduced technologies has also been conducted in Ethiopia, Uganda and Tanzania. The rolled-out technology bundle in Uganda consists of community-based artificial insemination (AI), heat-tolerant forages and feed/food crops, certification business model for small-scale commercial feed producers, strengthening of multi-stakeholder platforms and a PigSmart 1 extension platform for promoting best practices and tools in pig farming support that includes disease reporting and drought herd health management, suitable pig feeding, balanced least-cost feed rations using breeds and breeding, management of heat stress, and record-keeping to assess the financial performance of the Feed Calculator application, training and enterprise. In Tanzania, the best-bet technologies included in the intervention bundle are a digital platform for e-extension services, forage options, agent network model for extension services, Rume8 tool to specify total mixed rations, manure management, East Coast fever vaccine, and genomic evaluation of dairy cattle based on a digital herd recording platform. Similarly, communitybased AI of pigs and cattle, herd health management, feed and feed baskets, inclusive market arrangements, and African swine fever vaccination are made part of the technology bundle introduced in Vietnam. The characterization and selection process of best-bet technologies in Ethiopia included community-based breeding programs, certified breeding sires, fertility improving package for sheep and goat production, vaccination and treatment calendar for common small ruminant (SR) diseases, integrated herd health management, health certification of breeding rams, business-oriented sheep fattening, forage options, marketing models, multi-stakeholder platforms for collective actions, and policy advocacy.During the first year of implementation, the uptake of best-bet technologies has been witnessed in Uganda and Tanzania. With the private sector engagement, the establishment of a digital ecosystem in the form of the PigSmart platform in Uganda and a digital platform for e-extension and marketing in Tanzania have been widely adapted by the livestock value chain actors in both countries. Assessments and experimentation during the projects in Uganda and Tanzania have helped to determine the existing state of feed and forages and explore the potential economical feed and forage options. Based on the experimentation, improved and locally-grown forages and feed options significantly reduced the cost of feeding in both countries. Additionally, the training and certification of small-scale feed producers in Uganda has succeeded to standardize the quality of commercial feed production and induced more farmers to use certified commercial feed from certified small-scale feed producers.The substantial involvement of the public and private sectors has been instrumental in the implementation of various components of integrated packages in the project countries. The partnerships have been established with the digital solution service providers, academia, and government agencies for the implementation and sustainability of the interventions introduced by the projects. Despite slow progress in the implementation of projects, there are important successes and lessons from Uganda and Tanzania that could be worthwhile for Vietnam and Ethiopia to successfully implement technologies and enhance their uptake.The establishment of digital platforms in Uganda and Tanzania for advisory and e-extension services has been successful in terms of interest and adoption by the key value chain actors. Similarly, forage options for dairy and pigs, and community-based AI interventions in both of these countries are being widely adopted and becoming beneficial to the smallholder farmers.1 IntroductionEnhancing uptake of technology by the smallholder livestock farmers is a promising strategy to improve livestock productivity and the livelihoods of the producers. The interventions that involve empowered and appropriately skilled agri-entrepreneurs offer auspicious avenues for enhanced uptake of technologies and services, thus leading to increased productivity, competitiveness, and income of the smallholder producers. In contrast to a single intervention, an integrated bundle of interventions -that focus on the underlying determinants of technology uptake and equitable access -predominantly is likely to result in the improved and sustained livelihoods of the livestock producers. The smallholder livestock producers often lack access to essential knowledge, inputs and services to increase productivity and profitability. Therefore, the uptake of technology by the farmers has always remained a prolonged process. Multiple risks, including disease, climate, and market shocks, can limit their ability and willingness to innovate. Simultaneously, gender disparities hold women back, while young people's involvement in livestock enterprises gets constrained by lack of access to capital (land, finance) and cultural norms. Thus, the uptake of technology in livestock farming remains limited due to financial constraints (Mtimet et al. 2018) encountered by smallholders and keepers.Generally, livestock productivity is low in developing countries, with yield gaps of up to 300%. Livestock's low productivity is due to inadequate and poor-quality feed supply, high incidence of diseases leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The absence of organized smallholders breeding programs, lack of technical and business capacity of the producers, and a dearth of research and extension support systems further add to the list of impeding factors to productivity in the developing countries.Owing to a lack of capacity, skills and infrastructure for breeding programs in the national system, women and men farmers face enormous challenges in accessing genetically improved livestock in developing countries. The smallholder producers have limited knowledge about the best practices in husbandry, disease prevention and control. Also, they have inadequate access to quality veterinary inputs and advisory services. Low and seasonal variability of feed supply is another challenge the farmers face. Additionally, the producers and livestock extension agents lack knowledge on feed formulation and feed quality, so the available feed resources are utilized ineffectively. Usually, the functional feed quality control mechanism does not exist, which results in low trust of the produces in commercial feeds.Market inefficiencies exacerbate the livestock value chains that further limit the farmers' access to technology adoption benefits, thereby, disincentivizing its uptake. Input and output markets' inefficiencies impede the farmers' access to affordable quality feeds and profitable markets. Poor value chain performance is attributed to the lack of innovative institutional arrangements to enhance poor farmers' access to input and marketing services. Linkages between farmers and other value chain actors are mostly weak leading to inadequate access to quality inputs, credits, technical knowledge, and business skills. The small-scale livestock keepers and producers face enormous challenges to exploit the growing markets. The evidence shows that overcoming market inefficiencies provides incentives to them to adopt promising technologies in livestock farming, value addition and marketing.Livestock and their products play essential roles in contributing to most households' incomes in developing countries. The livestock assets are usually a way to save and insure against multiple risks to the families. The households predominantly invest these assets in off-farm enterprises to diversify and multiply livelihood opportunities. The income generated from various sources is often used for children's education, contributing to generational escape from poverty. Simultaneously, the demand for meat, milk, and eggs is increasing rapidly, especially in developing countries. Over half a billion small-scale producers, the majority of them women, currently meet most of the demand for most animal commodities. Also, women's role is instrumental in keeping and marketing a small stock of livestock that is usually their most important income source to feed their families. Additionally, livestock value chains also provide employment opportunities for input suppliers, service providers, and traders.Work under the CRP Livestock spans across Africa, the Middle East, Southeast Asia, and South and Central America. The learnings from the CRP Livestock proposed a focus on locally-adapted farming systems, which respond more flexibly to variations in landscape, climate, and socio-economic and political conditions. Such locally-oriented integrated interventions have the added benefit of providing local solutions to the farming community's issues. Therefore, the four priority countriesthree African (Ethiopia, Tanzania, Uganda) and one Asian (Vietnam) -were selected as a laboratory for CRP interventions to demonstrate the integration of technological and institutional innovations that enhance technology uptake and scaling amongst the smallholder livestock producers.This synthesis report reviews the types of technology bundles introduced in the four-country projects, processes adopted, and challenges faced in the integration of intervention bundles and uptake, and their contribution to improved productivity and the livelihoods of the smallholder livestock producers and keepers in the project countries. The delivery mechanisms, best practices, and lessons learned -documented by the project teams in each country -are collated, connected, and associated to derive the final consideration and way forward for the program partners, donors and researchers. This report is divided into five chapters. Chapter 1 provides an introduction and objectives of the synthesis report. The methodology and data collection for collating, organizing, and synthesising the information from secondary and primary sources are given in Chapter 2. Chapter 3 is the core part of the report that summarizes the results achieved by the countries so far. Chapter 4 is devoted to synthesizing the critical lessons learned through highlighting successes and areas of improvement. Based on the lessons learned, the final consideration and way forward are given in Chapter 5.Based on the principle that the evidence collated and constructed systematically improves decision-making and ultimately outcomes, this report summarizes the approaches, methods, progress, and results attained by the four countries' projects. It synthesizes the lessons learned relevant to the need of program partners, decision makers and researchers. The report also proposes final consideration and a way forward for the policymakers, donors and researchers to decide what methodological approaches and concerns need to be implemented for appropriately and adequately addressing the question of technology uptake by the smallholder livestock farmers.The specific objectives of the report are:• To review, extract, and collate information related to progress, achievements, challenges, practices, and lessons documented by the project countries in the form of reports, presentations, research articles, assessments, and evaluations.• To organize and structure the collated information under areas/themes of consideration and connect to analyse and synthesize the information for the program partners, stakeholders, researcher and decision makers.• To propose final consideration and a way forward for equitable and adequate uptake of the technology by the smallholder farmers that could lead to sustainable and improved livelihoods.2 Methodology and data collectionThis synthesis report is constructed using secondary data in the form of the published and unpublished substance of the four countries' projects. Similar to the baseline and midline reports of the four country projects; progress reports periodically submitted by the project country teams; glimpses of stakeholders' reflections documented in various stakeholders' workshops; presentations made by the implementing partners on the activities performed and outputs delivered; published research articles in peer-reviewed research journals; and other unpublished documents related to the program were used as sources.The links of the papers, reports and presentations consulted are given in the body of the report and listed in the references.Besides the secondary data specific to the projects, other relevant literature was also reviewed to analyse the practices, challenges, and learnings of the four-country projects in the broader context.The synthesis report was constructed by reviewing the documents of four country projects. A systematic approach was used to collate, extract, organize and connect information related to the specific areas, themes and concepts. For that purpose, a synthesis matrix was constructed with columns labelled 'countries', and each row labelled 'important area', 'concept', and 'theme' that recurred across all or most of the countries (see Table 1). The desired information from the source documents was then extracted and added against the relevant themes in the synthesis matrix to relate them across the countries/cases. Except for the goal and objectives of the individual country project, all other themes were connected and linked from different aspects across the countries to discern meaningful information and synthesize the successes and areas of improvement. Under the technological characterization theme, the process, considerations, and challenges were looked at across the countries. Similarly, the rationale and composition aspects of intervention bundles provided the basis for cross-country connectivity and association. Simultaneously, the implementation mechanisms were associated with the perspectives of delivery approaches, partners, and support mechanisms put in place by the country projects. The connectivity and relationship in the projects' progress were looked at from the efficiency and efficacy perspectives in attaining the intended outputs and outcomes. The practices adopted by the country projects were associated with the stage, context, and evolving situations. The final considerations and way forward were derived from the synthesized lessons learned for decision makers, donors, and other relevant stakeholders.This report is synthesized from the information contained in the form of reports, brochures, presentations, and papers. It has the following limitations.• This report is primarily built on the annual country progress reports (2020) of the four CRP priority countries and their projects proposals.• The annual reports of the CRP countries were incomplete either due to delay in the kick-off of the projects in those countries or implementation constrained due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The majority of the countries were either at the stage of finalization of technology bundles or had just rolled out the best-bet technologies at pilot sites.• Very minimal evidence on outcomes-related indicators has been documented by the countries so far.• The majority of the work so far has been done on the preparation and identification of the intervention packages in most of the priority countries. Therefore, the synthesis of the lessons learned at the level of implementation and results was only partially covered in this report.The livestock subsector is one of Uganda's important growth sectors with prospects of improving the livelihoods of the rural poor. The small livestock (such as chickens, goats and pigs) are particularly important 'insurance' and 'living banks' for poor households, which they sell to enable them to cope with shocks and stressors (Scott et al. 2016) and to meet planned financial needs such as school fees obligations. The sector contributes 17% of agriculture value-added and 4.3% of gross domestic product (GDP) (UBOS 2018).Of the livestock subsectors, the piggery especially presents a tremendous opportunity for rural households to generate income and to move out of poverty because it requires low capital investment and gives relatively quick and attractive returns. Therefore, more poor women and men are taking on pig rearing because of a guaranteed market. The growth in pig production has been on an upward trend since 2008 with a population of 3.2 -4.4 million pigs in 2019 (UBOS 2020). The pig sector is largely dominated by smallholders, who collectively constitute more than 90% of the agricultural system. The smallholders rank pig and crop production as a highly important source of livelihoods and guaranteed income-generators for women. The average productivity of pigs in Uganda is poor compared to the other regions of the world, but not different from that of East Africa and Africa as a whole. The estimated average carcass weight is 60 kg/animal in Uganda compared to 47.9kg/ animal in East Africa and 48.8 kg/animal in Africa (Twine and Njehu 2020).Pig-keeping in Uganda is categorized into three basic management systems; i) intensive, ii) semi-intensive, and iii) extensive (smallscale subsistence). In the intensive system, the pigs are kept housed all-time in a small place where they are provided with feed, water, and protection from extreme weather (Mutetikka 2009;Pezo and Waiswa 2012). This system is characterized by higher demand for labour and other inputs, but higher farm outputs are vital for commercial production. The intensive system accounts for a small proportion (less than 10%) of the pig production. This management system requires significant capital, management skills, and aggressive marketing arrangements. However, this system allows easy selection of breeding stock, faster growth of pigs, effective control of diseases/internal parasites, good hygiene in the pens, and eventually minimum mortality rate of piglets and pigs.In a semi-intensive management system, the pigs are partly housed and partly kept outdoors on pasture (Mutetikka 2009). Though this pig management system is rare, it can be found in areas where pork is highly remunerative. Limited space in this system provides opportunities to improve feeding, growth rate, disease control of heat stress and enhancement of mating to have betterquality animals (Pezo and Waiswa 2012). The extensive pig management system is the simplest and most common system in Uganda (almost 90% of the pigs are kept this way). Pigs are kept outside on the pasture all the time. This system is often practised by the very poor who invest in low-cost/low-output farming systems.The pig value chain is not well regulated in Uganda and typically operates under informal market arrangements. There are several intermediaries between the production and consumption nodes, which tend to lengthen the chain. There are generally no standards to adhere to in the value chain (Ouma et al. 2017). The value chain is characterized by the limited availability of end-market information on prices and there is a lack of transparency in transactions performed. Aimed at improving pigs' productivity and incomes of the value chain actors, the CGIAR Research Program on Livestock rolled out the 'Improving pig productivity and incomes through environmentally sustainable and gender-inclusive integrated intervention package' project in the country, with the following specific objectives:• Piloting and evaluating innovative market arrangements at the level of pig aggregators to strengthen the market linkage between them and pig farmers, and link the farmers to input and service providers.• Implementing and evaluating an integrated package for improving pig productivity and performance comprising of pig herd health practices, reproductive management, improved genetics, and better feeding for the farmers participating in the market arrangements.The theory of change (ToC) for the project is intended to address the problem of low income for pig value chain actors in Uganda through market arrangements and the introduction of integrated technology packages. The entry points for the project interventions are considered to be producers, input service providers and aggregators. Development of a well-designed digital ecosystem for agriculture, informed and trained value chain actors regarding innovative technology packages, available extension services for use and adoption of technologies, and the existence of required coordination amongst the value chain actors are set as short-medium term changes to be brought about by the project. The establishment of the systems, setting up of institutional arrangements, and uptake of technology packages by the value chain actors are some of the key mediumlong term changes to be brought about by the project. And the expected long-term changes are set to be business growth, increased market opportunities, and income of the value chain actors and farmers. Beginning in 2012, under the CRP Livestock and Fish, ILRI tested best-bet technology interventions to address specific pig value chain constraints in Uganda. The best-bet interventions then tested included feeding options, capacity building of the value chain actors, biosecurity control of African swine fever (ASF), and waste management. But the results showed limited uptake of the best-bet interventions due to financial constraints of the farmers to invest in them (Mtimet et al. 2018). The inefficiencies at input and output markets and limited access to veterinary services further disincentivized farmer uptake of these profitable technologies.The identified best-bet technological interventions, under the CRP Livestock and Fish, were first tested in small-scale pilots.Then the integrated technology packages were finalized for enhancing pigs' productivity and incomes of the pigs' aggregators.The technology packages covered health, genetics, feed and forages, livelihood, and environmental aspects of the pigs' production and value chain. The technology packages included:• Community-based artificial insemination for improved breeds of pigs.• Capacity building of pig farmers and other value chain actors in disease control.• Promotion of good animal husbandry through the utilization of PigSmart for disease reporting and advisory services.• Selection of heat-tolerant forages and feed/food crops or nutritious, affordable, and accessible feeds and forages for pigs' production.• Balanced least-cost rations.• Introduction of a certification business model for small-scale commercial feed producers to improve the feed quality.• Multi-stakeholder platforms for pigs' value chain at national and international levels and catalyzation of lower-level multistakeholder platforms (MSPs).The intervention packages were built on reducing the pigs environmental footprint through assessment of different packages of interventions in terms of water and land, competition with human food, and future climate change. The best-bet interventions were developed, tested, and evaluated on reduced environmental footprint through waste management, and adapting to heat stress.A systematic approach was applied to scaling individual technologies and the integrated package. The approach comprised of structured assessments of scaling suitability of individual technologies and integrated packages through scaling frameworks and implementation arrangements. That approach helped in the systematic navigation of the complexities involved in the implementation of the intervention package.The Impact at Scale program (I@S) assessed the scaling readiness (Sartas et al. 2020) and developed a scaling plan for the 'training and certification of small-scale feed producers' through holding a stakeholders' consultative workshop. Scaling readiness is a decision support system designed to support CGIAR projects and programs to improve the use of innovation at scale. I@S assessed the scaling-readiness (Sartas 2020) of two components a) 'Piloting and evaluating a training and certification business model to improve feed quality for small-scale commercial feed producers in Uganda,' and b) 'Marketing arrangement intervention.' The assessment covered intervention profiling, innovation profiling, innovation package profiling, and scaling strategy/plan. The intervention profiling described and assessed the characteristics of the component by giving the rationale, with a snapshot of facts and diagnosis. The innovation profiling explained the critical innovation component and assessed its characteristics in terms of its potential to achieve use at scale. The innovation package profiling highlighted all other innovations necessary to use the program at scale in a specific (Uganda) context and covered assessment of those other innovations. Finally, the scaling strategy brought all three together and provided a recommendation for improving the use of training and certification programs at scale in Uganda. Each step covered the rationale with a snapshot of the facts and concluded the diagnosis. The assessment concluded that improving the content of the training and certification program will not be sufficient to increase the use of the program at scale.However, the specific recommendations made by the assessment for the piloting and evaluating a training and certification business model to improve feed quality for small-scale commercial feed producers in Uganda were to:• Study the experience of 'feed certification implementation group' and establish a group to support with the same mandate.• Study the experiences of 'feed standard associations' in a similar context and prepare organizational establishment statements and business plans for new associations.• Share the plan of the implementation group with the partners and other stakeholders working in the feed sector.• Support testing of the PigSmart digital extension platform and its dissemination to the stakeholders working on an extension in the pig sector.• Create learning on quality and safety aspects of feed production training to make commercially viable and superior feed mixes.• Design a training curriculum based on the findings of knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) analysis with a flexible scheduling and input-output approach.• Convert the conceptual model of combining training, certification, and licensing into an application model by detailing the plan.• Present the curriculum based on the findings of KAP with flexible scheduling to other components and initiatives working on the feed research and development.• Include a training curriculum as a commercial course in the Continuing Agricultural Education Centre (CAEC) of Makerere University.• Collaborate with other organizations or projects providing role-based training.The specific recommendations made by the assessment for the marketing arrangement intervention in Uganda were to:• Conduct desktop research on successful implementations of openly sharing market-related information in livestock value chains in East Africa.• Validate existing evidence-based logistical arrangement approaches in pig value chains and tailor them for use in Uganda at scale.• Validate existing effective hands-on-brokerage techniques in pig value chains and tailor them for implementing them at scale in Uganda.• Conduct desktop research on existing transportation best-practices in pig value chains and design a blueprint of how they can be implemented in Uganda.• Validate how existing pig health, weight and other price and quality-related inspection practices can perform in Ugandan pig value chains and design an application that combines the effective practices.The project developed and tested an environmentally sustainable and gender-inclusive integrated intervention package. The package contained innovative market arrangements at the pig market aggregators level to strengthen the market linkages between them and the pig farmers and link the farmers with input and service providers. Such market arrangements were made to incentivize the uptake of productivity-enhancing technologies, including herd health practices, reproductive management, improved genetics, and better feeding. This section covers the steps, strategies, and approaches taken and adopted by the project to ensure and enhance the uptake of profitable technologies by the smallholder farmers and other value chain actors.A scoping study was conducted to assess the existing business models utilized by the pig aggregators, input suppliers and service providers to further support the design of the intervention (Sebatta et al. 2020). The assessment explored the existing pig aggregator business model operating in the project area. The study findings note that the smallholder farmers mostly sell live pigs to holding units (abattoirs). The large farmers sell live pigs either directly to the holding units or to village middlemen who then sell to abattoirs. There also exists a typical pork aggregator/butchery model. Abattoirs sell fresh pork to butchers and consumers as fresh cuts. The abattoirs sell off-cuts to the traders. The smallholder farmers directly sell live pigs to pork joints (butcheries). While pork is directly sold to butcheries by the farmers, small and large abattoirs sell to butchery. The butcheries then sells fresh and fried pork to the ultimate consumers.The scoping study also profiled veterinary practitioners, and drug and feeds suppliers to the smallholder farmers. The study findings noted that the veterinarian had the least membership of associations and all the sampled veterinary stockists were serving the pigs. The proportion of the total drugs dispensed for various pig diseases by the stockists appeared mainly for African swine fever (82%), followed by worms (71%) and mange (53%). The main barriers that affected drug stockists' businesses were i) poor roads that delayed delivery of drugs, ii) high taxation and license fees that resulted in high cost of operation, and iii) unreliable energy supply that led to spoilage of drugs needing refrigeration. The assessment suggested i) ensure stable and reliable energy supply, ii) reduce energy tariffs for small businesses, iii) revise taxes levied on veterinary distributors, iv) organize veterinarians into associations, v) provide additional training in veterinary drug management and disease investigation, and vi) scrap off non-effective drugs.The study also documented that the feed processors/stockists involved in commercial feed production had adopted different innovations along with feed processing. The feed industry was providing technical advisory services in feed formulation, feed requirements for different livestock, feed storage, proper housing hygiene, proper feeding regimes, disease management, and bio-safety measures. Stakeholders also have strategized to cope with the changing market through maintaining the quality of the products and adapting to the prevailing market situation by introducing new innovative products in the market such as concentrates. The main constraints impeding the businesses of feed processors/stockists were related to policy issues, adulteration of feeds, inappropriate feed formulation resulting in poor-quality feeds, highly priced commercial feed ingredients (concentrates), price fluctuations, and competition with imported feeds. Therefore, the assessment suggested that the government enact a Feed Bill to regulate the feed industry, conduct content analysis of commercial compounded feeds and concentrates, regulate the export of maize, support traders to stock feed raw materials, set up ceiling price, give credit to farmers, and enter into contractual agreements with the farmers.A situation analysis study (Twine and Njehu 2020) assessed the conditions within which the pig value chain actors operate in Uganda and provided an overview of past trends, current status, and future directions in the pig value chain. The assessment also identified challenges being faced by the different value chain actors and the opportunities for improvement. The study witnessed the increasing demand and market for pork across all regions of the country and found a potential demand for pig meat in neighbouring countries such as South Sudan. But the dominance of subsistence, smallholder pig production systems, and lack of organized farmer groups to collectively access the extension services, inputs, and credits were identified as the limiting factors for large-scale and quality commercial production of pig meat in Uganda.Considering the findings of the scoping study and situation analysis, the project adopted a market system approach by supporting strong and more profitable linkages between pig aggregators (buyers) and pig producers. Those market arrangements strengthened the backward linkages with the inputs and services suppliers that incentivized the adoption of best-bet interventions. A service provider, Ultimate Business Strategies (UBS), was engaged in mentoring pig aggregators, input suppliers, and service providers in market arrangements and strengthening their entrepreneurial capacities. A training manual was developed for the value chain actors to be used for training on market system development. A series of training, coaching, and mentoring sessions were carried out with various value chain actors.Aimed at improving the pig market system through enhancing knowledge in the market system approach, a virtual six-day training on market system development for 19 CRP Livestock country staff and key partners was conducted by a private partner (UBS). UBS applied a mix of approaches while introducing the concept of market systems development and training 59 aggregators from Mukono and Masaka, and 24 feed and drug stockists from the same sites. To strengthen the entrepreneurial and business capacities of women-led businesses, a private sector partner (Enterprise Uganda) was contracted. The focus of the intervention predominantly remained on the capacity building of pig aggregators, feed, and drugs stockists. The interventions included customized and specialized entrepreneurship training, one-on-one and/or group mentoring, networking, and peer learning engagements. Moreover, the project trained 30 extension agents as trainers of trainers (ToT) on the use of the gross margin calculator for the small-scale farmers to understand their businesses.Poor management and husbandry practices increase the risk of transmission of highly infectious diseases such as ASF (Dione et al. 2020b). Poor biosecurity and breeding practices also contribute to disease transmission. The lack of functional livestock disease surveillance mechanisms in the country has compounded the problem of disease control. On disease control and modelling, a systematic review of the 'Status of research and gaps on respiratory diseases of swine in Africa' (Oba et al. 2020) highlighted knowledge and information gaps related to the epidemiologic and economic impact of various pathogens on pigs.The review revealed that limited research had been conducted in Africa on respiratory pathogens. No study was found looking at the economic impact of any of the pathogens on pig productivity in Africa. Similarly, the review further informed that the surveillance systems, specific to respiratory pathogens, were either weak or non-existent. Most of the national surveillance systems were found focusing on a single disease, such as ASF, instead of undertaking a more holistic approach to gauge the breadth of pig diseases and their impact to get better insights for targeting interventions. Limited investment in animal health was seen as alarming and needed to give attention to the control of diseases that affect productivity and threaten the livelihood of smallholder farmers.A disease transmission simulation model framework, developed in Vietnam, was adapted to tackle porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) in Lira District. Results were reported in a paper that was submitted for publication. A modelling analysis to assess the global incidence and prevalence trends of Taenia solium/porcine cysticercosis globally was carried out with a subset of Uganda dataset collected from Masaka and Lira districts to better understand the geographical heterogeneities in its transmission and support post-2020 World Health Organization (WHO) targets.Research related to single infectious diseases generated useful information and knowledge to characterize the pig health status (Dione et al. 2014;Ouma et al. 2015;Roesel et al. 2017;Dione et al. 2018). But the wider herd 'ecosystem' has health issues related to feeding strategies, co-infection, and reproductive management. Thus, herd health management (HHM) is a method to optimize health, welfare, and production in the herd. HHM does not focus on a single infectious disease, rather on general farm conditions such as feed strategies, biosecurity, general health, reproductive management, husbandry and management skills to ensure sustainable production and maximize profit. The project strengthened advisory services to the value chain actors (farmers, traders and butchers) on herd health and best practices in biosecurity with value chain actors. Information communication technology-based (ICT-based) dissemination of information to the actors and players involved in the pig value chain was used by the project. A publication on 'Assessment of gender perspective of pig husbandry and disease control among smallholder pig farmers in Uganda' was published in Agrigender (Dione et al. 2020a). The paper recommended measures to improve ASF control and better disease management.A training course was designed to equip the Uganda veterinarians (known as 'vet champions') in skills on HHM. Five vet champions received two weeks of intensive training at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden.The training course provided an opportunity for the vet champions to exchange knowledge and experiences with Swedish veterinarians and learn from them. After training, the vet champions provided support, training, and mentorship to fellow veterinarians in applying herd health principles at the farm level.The project developed an integrated training manual on herd health management and biosecurity for smallholder pig value chain actors. The manual informed the herd-health module of the PigSmart platform for dissemination of the messages for various value chain actors. A training module on prudent and efficient use of antibiotics was also developed. All the five animal health champions were trained on the module and then supported the smallholder value chain actors. SLU, together with pig herd health champions and Makerere University, developed a mixed on-site/remote training format for prudent and efficient use of antibiotics.Uganda lacks pig registration of known breeds that can allow pig keepers to select pig breeds of their preferences. The registration and certification of animal breeds, breeders, and breeding centres is yet to be put in place for pigs. Pig farmers, therefore, face significant constraints in the genetic improvement of their stocks. They have limited access to high-productivity pig breeds, information about high productivity traits, and there is inability to keep and record mating practices. Pig breed types are considered at the level of local, exotic, and cross-bred (Muhanguzi et al. 2012).The project introduced a community-based model for artificial insemination (AI) of pigs to support the uptake of improved breeds of pigs. For the implementation of the intervention (AI), collaboration was sought with the local partners for the capacity building of farmers on AI, and linkages were developed with the local service providers for AI services and semen supply. A survey of pigs' aggregators was administered to know their perceptions of the community-based AI approach.Comprehensive training materials on pig breeds and breeding were developed and tailored to the context of Uganda in four local languages (Marshall 2020). Online service providers delivered AI services and pieces of training to the farmers. In the era of global connectivity, the digital solutions/digital ecosystem was conceived as a better approach towards enhancing awareness, outreach, accessibility, and effectiveness of the best-bet interventions. An ecosystem of digital players was established in the form of the 'PigSmart' platform. Based on the assessment of the knowledge, attitude, practices (KAP), and needs of the pig value chain actors (Dione et al. 2020b), the best-bet interventions were designed and embedded in the PigSmart innovation, which provided multiple digital solutions to the growers, aggregators and other value chain actors of the pig value chain. Under the umbrella of that digital innovation, a 'feed calculator' was introduced through a mobile-based app to compute the least cost and balanced feed for livestock. Similarly, a 'gross margin calculator' was developed for the farmers to calculate input cost and output prices to promote the concept of farming as a business and bring efficiency in pig farming.While an EzyAgric application served as a hub of knowledge and an e-commerce platform for production, produce, marketing, and financial access of all the stakeholders involved in the pig value chain. PigSmart also provided a data-driven and inclusive platform to link the community-based cooperatives and individual farmers with the input suppliers and service providers.The engagement of the private sector companies in the PigSmart digital innovation was seen as a sustainable mechanism. The companies engaged included Single Spark Ltd. for a feed calculator mobile-based app, AgriTech Talk International for the gross margin calculator, Akorion Company Limited or EzyAgric for the digitized financial and market information bundle, and Vetline services Ltd for AI services.The small-scale commercial feed producers have dominated (75%) the production of compounded feeds in Uganda. But they have lacked the basic knowledge of feed ingredients, formulation, and production. The farmers, more often than not, complained about the poor and inconsistent quality, and high cost of such mixed feeds. Moreover, enforcement of rules and regulations in commercial feed production was almost non-existent. Therefore, training and certification of small-scale commercial feed producers' model was initiated by the project. The main purpose of the initiative was to improve feed quality, maximize feed utilization and grow markets of commercial feeds to support farmers in improving pig nutrition and get value for their money. The training and certification business model was piloted and evaluated through a collaboration with Makerere University, Lira University, MAAIF, Uganda National Bureau of Standards (UNBS), and feed companies (Lukuyu 2020). The model encompassed training courses and manuals on feed-formulation, mixing and feed safety. Best-practice protocols and guidelines were developed for small-scale feed production to put in place a quality assurance system (by bringing on board Reco Industries Ltd). The small-scale producers were selected and trained in feed formulation, production, and best practices. The baseline and end-line knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) of small-scale feed producers and the quality of the feed produced were assessed during the training and certification intervention and the result was certification of trainees and catalysing of the formation of a feed manufacturers association for self-regulation.Under the capacity building interventions, 16 extension staff and other village agents were trained on the Feed Calculator app to formulate feed rations based on the local feed ingredients. Then, those agents supported farmers' groups in the formulation of quality feed rations for pigs. The previous studies note that the more commonly used feeds in Uganda include maize bran obtained from local millers, crop residues, kitchen waste, cut-and-carry green forages and farm weeds (Mutetikka 2009). The feed types used by the farmers vary depending on the season (Lule and Lukuyu 2017). In the rural areas, pig farmers mostly rely on sweet potato vines, maize bran, weeds, and cassava leaves to feed pigs in the dry season. Other feed types used in small amounts include home-mixed rations, swill, and cassava roots. In the urban areas, maize bran is more commonly used, constituting nearly half (45%) of the pig diets, followed by home-mixed rations, swill, and sweet potato peels.The project introduced the Feed Calculator app through the PigSmart digital platform in partnership with Single Spark Ltd (a private sector service provider). The service provider recruited, trained, and backstopped the farmers and feed producers on using the Feed Calculator app. Sixteen extension agents were trained on the Feed Calculator app for making feed rations. Those agents supported farmers, through groups, in the formulation of quality feeds for pigs. A total of 30 extension agents were trained as ToTs on the use of the gross margin calculator tool for the small-scale pig farmers to understand their pig businesses. Improved forages were promoted through farmer field schools, radio messages, and the distribution of extension messages through word of mouth. Also, business models for forage seed production were tested.Heat stress is a global issue constraining livestock production and potentially intensifying future climate change. When the cows and pigs get exposed to continuous heat stress, their bodies lose the ability to cool themselves effectively, resulting in lowered productivity, weakened immune systems, and, at times death. A journal article, 'A methodology for mapping current and future heat stress risk in pigs' (Mutua et al. 2020a) mapped heat stress risk and quantified the number of pigs exposed to heat stress using 18 global circulation models and projected impact in the 2050s. The results showed that more than 800,000 pigs would be affected by heat stress in Uganda in the future and provided evidence for policy formulation and resource allocations in the livestock sector of the country.The International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) conducted heat stress mapping for dairy, beef, pig, sheep, goat, and poultry across East Africa. The exercise identified hotspot areas that could significantly affect livestock production in the absence of adaptation and mitigation measures. In the light of the heat stress mapping study for dairy and pig, an adaptationplanning stakeholders' workshop identified the effects of the heat stress on pig production and value chain (Mutua et al. 2020b). The list of effects predominantly were change in the design of the structure, increase in disease prevalence, change in transportation pattern, and reduced volume of trade. The list of ongoing adaptation measures that the pig value chain actors used to take were the use of microorganisms as feeding methods, promotion of heat stress-tolerant breeds, transportation of animals during night-time, and increased establishment of pig market associations. To cope with and mitigate the listed effects of heat stress, the stakeholders suggested enhancing knowledge and information sharing among the pig value chain actors, catalysing smart innovations, and increasing investment and funding. They also emphasized conducting more research on animal welfare, tree species for pastures and silvopastoral systems, and climate-resilient livestock breeds and forages/pastures.As a part of multi-stakeholder learning series around livestock and climate change, a policy briefing workshop was organized in Kampala on 10 December 2020 (Mutua et al. 2020c). The 'Reducing climate-Induced heat stress in pigs in Uganda: Policy actions,' workshop was co-hosted by MAAI and MWE and attended by 59 participants (including 15 women). The briefing focused on heat stress in pigs and its anticipated adverse impacts on the pig sector in Uganda. The presented analysis of the historical climate data and simulation predicted a gradual shift towards severe heat stress conditions in most parts of the country. The pigs were found to be more vulnerable to heat stress because they do not have functional sweat glands. The heat stress distorts the pigs' feed intake, growth, and reproduction, thus making them more vulnerable to diseases. The research, therefore, suggested that the adaptation of smallholder pig production systems to heat stress needs to be a policy priority and recommended policy options for agricultural extension, national-and local-level policymakers, and development donors and organizations. The policy briefing workshop recommended coordinated national-and local-level policymaking, promotion of heat stress coping and adaptation measures at farm level, preparation of action plans at various stages of the value chain, close cooperation and information sharing between research and policy, and creation of an enabling environment for the farmers to adapt and mitigate heat stress in pigs.Involving MAAF, Ministry of Water and Environment (MWE), and NaLIRRI, the project conducted a Comprehensive Livestock Environment Assessment for improved Nutrition, secured Environment, and sustainable Development (CLEANED) virtual training. In addition, a knowledge exchange and transfer consultation workshop on heat stress was held, which was attended by 30 participants from policy, research, the private sectors, and civil society. A technical training manual on the management of heat stress in pigs was compiled in partnership with Makerere University.• An inclusive market arrangement is put in place at the project sites that ensures forward linkages of pig producers with pig aggregators and backward linkages with input suppliers and service providers who are incentivized to adopt best-bet interventions. Moreover, the value chain actors, particularly pig aggregators, feed and drug stockists are trained on market system development and are skilled enough to expand and sustain profitable businesses. The outcomes include:a.Strengthened intra-and inter-actor relationships. The majority of the pig aggregators unanimously agreed on the need to foster new relationships with various value chain actors as well as amongst themselves to harness the opportunities within the various relationships. Most pig aggregators had weak relationships with farmers and consumers and almost non-existent relationships with the district local governments, vet service providers, and input suppliers. UBS identified the relationship gaps and identified and implemented intentional activities aimed to close the gaps. Several meetings were held between the aggregators and the pig farmers/pig farmer cooperatives to identify the needs and chart a way forward to address the needs including linkages with input and service providers.b. Improved market linkages. UBS supported pig farmers to establish mutually beneficial long-term relationships with aggregators through engagements between the farmers and aggregators. It also fostered the emergence of relationships between aggregators, inputs dealers and pig farmers to incentivise the uptake of good-quality inputs and services through the farmer-aggregator-input service provider meetings.c. Increased uptake of improved business management practices. Pig aggregators and feed producers were coached and mentored. The individual aggregator business sessions were intended to improve the value chain actors' business management practices. This interested them to grow their businesses by being more customer-centric and also to consider possibilities of managing agent retail networks.d.Strengthened capacity of industry associations. UBS supported the institutionalization of industry associations to develop and enforce a code of conduct. Five associations have been supported to emerge.• The farmers are practising AI and benefiting from the AI service providers and semen suppliers. The outcomes are yet to be documented.• A digital ecosystem is established in the form of a PigSmart platform that is providing multiple digital solutions to the growers, aggregators, and other value chain actors. One of those digital solutions is a 'feed calculator app' that is being used by smallholder farmers and small-scale feed producers for the formulation of nutritious and balanced feed for livestock from the locally available cheap feed ingredients. The 'gross margin calculator app' is also being used by the farmers to calculate the gross margin of their farming business through feeding input cost data and output prices. This app has succeeded to promote the concept of farming as a business entity amongst the smallholder farmers. Moreover, all the value chain actors now have access to information regarding production, produce, marketing, and financing through an e-commerce platform in the shape of an EzyAgric app that is embedded in the digital ecosystem, the PigSmart. Altogether, introducing the digital solution to technical advisory services has strengthened the overall pig value chain system in the target areas. The aggregate demands of the farmers for input supplies and services have started to be delivered to the individual farmers and groups at competitive market rates by the quality-assured resources.• Training and certification of small-scale feed producers have standardized the quality of commercial feed production and have induced more farmers to start using certified commercial feeds from small-scale feed producers. The long-term results in the form of improved growth and productivity of pigs is likely to be achieved and documented soon.• The insights from the policy brief attracted high-level political participation from the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries (MAAIF), MWE, and the Office of the Prime Minister. The policy actors, international and national organizations gave comments for improving the brief, which will be updated soon.• The substantial involvement of public and private sector partners has been instrumental in the implementation of various components of the integrated package and has emerged as a sustainable mechanism. New partnerships have been established with digital solution service providers, capacity-building service providers, academia, and government functionaries for the implementation and sustainability of interventions introduced by the projects.• The scoping study and situation analysis of the pig value chain helped determine the existing mechanism for marketing of live pigs and pork; delivery of veterinary services, drugs and feeds to smallholder farmers; addressing barriers and challenges to the drug stockists, feed processors, and veterinary services providers; and the operational environment for pig value chain actors in Uganda. A scaling readiness approach was used to assess the scalability of best-bet technologiestraining and certification of small-scale feed producers. This evidence-based approach in setting up market arrangements guided targeted activities and actions that led to the development of profitable linkages between pig aggregators and pig producers. Similarly, a consultative approach in the assessment of scaling readiness of best-bet technologies, through stakeholders' workshops, helped to thoroughly review the pros and cons of the technologies' scale-up to address potential barriers in implementation and opportunities for the actors involved to maximize the benefits from the technology. The scaling readiness approach guided the relevant stakeholders towards ensuring the sustainability of the assessed technological interventions.• The digital platform (PigSmart) has proved to be beneficial for the farmers in balancing feed for pigs and running of better performing businesses. It also has been instrumental in enabling access to information and knowledge for the producers and other dairy value chain actors. The sustainability of such a platform has yet to be ensured after the withdrawal of project support. However, the engagement of the private sector in the development, troubleshooting, and operationalization of the digital platform has provided a good opportunity to find a mechanism that ensures that the current level of stakeholders' coordination and the financial viability of the digital innovation introduced by the project is sustained.Tanzania has the third largest livestock population in Africa, with about 30 million cattle. The livestock sector contributes about 7% to the national GDP. Though the sector contributes merely 1.5% to the national GDP, it is critical to the rural economy for being a source of income, employment, nutrition, and food security of more than 2.3 million people in the country. There are two main systems: improved dairy that comprises only 3% of the national herd yet produces 30% of the milk; and the traditional, or pre-commercial, livestock production system. Dominated by the smallholder farmers, the dairy sector in Tanzania struggles for a variety of reasons. The prevalence of poor management practices and seasonal fluctuations in the availability of forage and feed preclude many smallholder farmers from accessing affordable extension and veterinary services. The lack of high-quality inputs, such as parasite control, nutritious feed, vaccines, and AI, are at the heart of the problem.Given the dependence of the country on natural resources, the dairy sector is highly vulnerable to climate change. Although, climate change is a global phenomenon, dairy farming is a climate-sensitive economic sector. Drought is the most serious climate-change factor that affects feed and water availability, animal health, and in turn milk production. Usually in Tanzania, a dry season's decline in milk production exceeds 40% due to feeding scarcity. Thus, adaptation solutions in the form of policies, strategies, and plans are needed to cope with the ever-changing climate. Since a healthy economy and a healthy environment go hand-in-hand, both are needed for the survival and prosperity of the sector and populace.Commercialization of smallholder dairying in Tanzania was seen as a critical mechanism for improved productivity of smallholder livestock farmers and dairy development. The building of pre-commercial dairy market hubs (DMHs) and innovation platforms (IPs) around enterprising value chain actors, in the previous phase of Maziwa Zaidi were found to be promising entry points for creating and growing linkages among the value chain actors for improved access to market, inputs, and services. At the same time, sustained investment in the promotion of proven dairy technologies and innovations yielded significant results in Kenya and Rwanda, wherein dairy contributed around 6-8% of their national GDPs. Based on the previous experience, a project titled, 'Agri-entrepreneurship, technology uptake and inclusive dairy development in Tanzania' was designed to catalyse uptake of dairy technology packages through institutional approaches that involved inclusive agribusiness models for improved livelihoods of smallholders and environmental sustainability. Beyond the traditional value chain model, the project adopted a market-system approach that emphasized and upgraded the inclusive value chain for overall economic growth.The specific objectives of the project are:• Smallholder women and men farmers have reliable and consistent access to quality inputs and services to achieve high milk productivity efficiently.• Smallholder men and women farmers have access to inclusive, reliable, well-coordinated, and efficient dairy products' marketing arrangements with resultant improvement in household income and livelihoods.• Poor consumers have improved access to quality, safe, and nutritious dairy products at affordable prices, reflected by an increase in their per capita consumption of safe dairy products. An interactive and participatory approach was adopted in the identification and scaling of profitable dairy intervention packages. The identification process was initiated through consultation with the agri-entrepreneurs, national researchers, service providers, and delivery organizations in a workshop held in October 2019. With stakeholders' input, the basic structure and protocol for the characterization of two principal types of packages (delivery and enabling) were designed and developed. Each package essentially contained a technical product (intervention/innovation), institutional and delivery mechanisms, and a set of actions to grow the technical and business capacities of the target actors. The delivery packages integrated product, services, and technical know-how. Eventually, four dairy interventions and support mechanisms were identified that could be profitably delivered to the producers and value chain actors.The four technical products selected for the delivery packages included Brachiaria grass (or other forage options), manure management, East Coast fever (ECF) vaccine, and AI. The institutional arrangements and delivery mechanism for the delivery packages included capacity development of agri-entrepreneurs and agribusinesses that were supporting market access, safe products, and effective collective action. The package also included the establishment of institutional arrangements for digital platforms to be used for farmers' profiling and e-extension services for the smallholder producers. The enabling packages involved the change agents and partners to provide services to the agri-entrepreneurs and agribusinesses in the form of technical know-how, and business and soft skills that were necessary for the dairying to be a profitable business.Capacitated agri-entrepreneurs working through Agent Network Model, Dairy Farmer Assistant Model, and DMHs were conceived as the potential delivery mechanisms for enhancing uptake of demand-driven technology packages. The presence of partners, farmers with dairying potential, sustainable markets, processors, unmet demand, and conducive agro-ecological factors for dairying were considered in the selection of sites for the implementation of the project. The group of smallholder dairy producers as well as individual producers were targeted. Parallel assessments were planned to support the piloting and evaluation including the 'environmental assessment of selected packages', 'participatory system modelling', and 'scaling readiness'. The Scaling Scan tool was used to formulate a realistic and responsible scaling ambition by identifying the challenges and opportunities that need to be addressed. Ten scaling ingredients 2 were used to evaluate each technical product at a 1 to 5 scale (where a high score means more confidence in reaching the ultimate objective). Three types of interventions, with relatively great potential for scaling, were identified in this order: AI, forages, and East Coast fever vaccine. Of the bottlenecks assessed on the scaling ingredients, 'finance' emerged at the top, followed by 'evidence and learning', 'leadership and management', and 'public sector governance', whereas the key strengths mentioned in order of importance were: 'technology/practice', 'awareness and demand' and 'knowledge and skills.' Key officials from the public and private sector partners reviewed the results of ex-ante modelling of environmental impacts and prioritized opportunities for scaling environmental management interventions in the dairy sector (Ngoteya et al. 2020a).For genomic evaluations of the animals, an index developed by the African Dairy Genetic Gains (ADGG) project allowed for the selection of animals to be used for breeding that had an improved rate of milk production with constant body weight.The project used the results from the genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) for milk production and bodyweight of the animals, conducted under ADGG.The involvement of the private sector in key commodity value chains and the participation of smallholders in input markets was very limited in Tanzania. There were no efficient ways to promote rural commercialization as a key mechanism for improving dairy productivity and livestock-dependent livelihoods. Moreover, integration of scale-ready innovations to enhance their uptake by the smallholders was almost non-existent. In that backdrop, the project engaged empowered agrientrepreneurs as entry points for service provision and focal points for packaging of technologies. Strong business-oriented partnerships were built to enable skills training for youth and women, and delivery of bundled technologies to the targeted value chain actors and smallholder dairy farmers.The use of digital technologies in agriculture provides digital platforms to access information on needs and demands for services that support agricultural farming. The digital platforms link data on many farmers, crops, animals, and technologies to evaluate productive potential and set benchmarks for increased productivity. The CRP Livestock projects leveraged the ADGG digital platform for e-extension and maximizing market access. The users of the digital platform included feed suppliers, milk producers, AI service providers, and animal health service providers. The ADGG project developed an agile and scalable webbased data platform to collate and sort data obtained from the small-, medium-, and large-scale farmers by the performance recording agents (PRA)/livestock extension officers. The PRAs pay monthly visits to collect dairy productivity data and support farmers in the dairy management system. The PRAs relay the data to the ADGG data platform using tools developed on the ODK data platform. The collated data are verified, linked, and analysed through the ADGG platform and mirrored on the servers of the Dairy Performance Recording Center (DPRC). The feedback on animal productivity is then shared with farmers through one-on-one interaction or SMS messages facilitated by the i-Cow platform. The ADGG has delivered training and refreshers to PRAs on data collection using the ODK tool.Moreover, in collaboration with Farm.ink, two digital training courses were developed and digitized to turn the static course content into a fun and an engaging web app for dairy farmers on the Learn.ink platform. Training apps were developed for use in the training of the value chain actors and producers on calving management and milk hygiene. The apps were implemented through a digital marketing campaign. The assessment of the piloted web apps reported 9,937 users that went through digital training tools and attained an average score of 90% in the post-lesson quiz. The users rated digital training courses at 4.7/5 stars.Feed and feeding are the most important input for increased productivity of livestock. Therefore, access to good quality forages for dairy and beef animals is key. A review report on the forage seed system in the pilot sites of Tanzania (Ngunga and Mwendia 2020) highlighted the existence of a weak formal forage production system. The report further pointed out the limited involvement of the private sector for sustainability, while seed production of limited forage species was mainly carried out on public sector farms and in research institutes. Complete reliance on the public sector for seed availability and lack of awareness have constrained access to seed by the farmers. Therefore, the review report identified the inaccessibility of quality feed as a major factor that contributed to the low productivity of livestock in East Africa.Brachiaria grass has played a key role in transforming livestock sectors across the tropics, except in Africa. It is a native African grass that produces high amounts of quality biomass. It is adapted to drought and low fertility soils. Moreover, Brachiaria can be grown in all types of soils from 0-2,400 metres in altitude while requiring 800mm rainfall. It is also not susceptible to frost. From an environmental perspective, the Brachiaria grass sequesters atmospheric carbon dioxide, protects soil erosion, and reduces greenhouse gas emissions. Empirical evidence (Ghimire et al. 2019) showed that the Brachiaria grass extended forage availability up to three dry months, increased milk production of cows between 15-40% c those fed on local forage and contributed to 50% more body weight gain of heifers fed on Brachiaria grass plus concentrate compared to those fed on Napier grass plus concentrate. Based on the reported evidence, a poster was published highlighting the benefits and opportunities for scaling up Brachiaria grass in the project areas. The poster pointed out the availability of products and hay-making technologies for the Brachiaria grass and the existence of demand for Brachiaria seed to convert that into an opportunity for women and youth to generate income with limited assets.Another assessment was conducted to seek forage options for the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. Using 'Targeting Tools' -a web geographic information system (GIS) -the context-specific varieties were tested in three districts namely, Mufindi, Njombe and Rugwe with farmers' participatory approach. The tested forages included two Cenchrus purpureus (Syn. Pennisetum purpureum) cultivars, two Urochloa (Syn. Brachiaria) hybrids, and Chloris gayana. Where applicable, the grasses were intercropped with three forage legumes-Lablab purpureus, Stylosanthes guianensis and Desmodium intortum, while Tripsacum andersonii (Syn.Tripsa-cum laxum), a grass, was planted as a local check. The assessment observed clear differences amongst the three districts and treatments. Dry matter (DM) accumulation (t ha−1) in the districts, and across the various forage treatments was higher in Rugwe followed by Mufindi and Njombe. Most DM accumulation was by Napier grass intercropped with Lablab purpureus that was closely comparable to Chloris gayana-Desmodium intercrop (Mwendia et al. 2019).Sustainable dairy production systems need greater quantities of home-grown quality forages that can greatly reduce livestock production costs without compromising productivity. Therefore, the project evaluated the impact of improved Napier grass and maize stover-based diets on milk yield under smallholder conditions. The evaluation used 23 farms as experimental units and 24 lactating cows as replicates. The study findings noted that the Napier grass supplemented with bean haulms resulted in milk yields similar to those the Napier grass supplemented with concentrate feed. Thus, mixing Napier grass with legume crops' residues has the potential to increase milk yields on farms. While the cows fed on maize stover-based diets had low dry matter intake (DMI), which affected the milk yield of animals, this indicates maize stover should not be relied on as a basal diet for feeding milking cows due to low palatability and high fibre content.A general lack of knowledge on husbandry practices and the higher cost of procuring inputs (time plus transportation) by the individual farmers discourage the use of appropriate technology and husbandry practices, which are essential to enhance the productivity of smallholder dairy farmers. An agent network model (ANM) provides a link between agro-dealers and farmers.In the ANM model, qualified personnel were engaged as agents to train farmers on husbandry practices, technologies and create awareness about the agro-dealers products. The agents receive bulk orders from farmers and coordinate delivery by saving time and transportation costs of inputs. The agents are incentivized for offering training and creating demand in the form of commission on the volume of sales.Based on reviews and evidence, the project team developed a poster for advocacy of the ANM model as a cost-effective modality by reducing transaction costs of inputs procured by the farmers. The ANM approach has also enhanced the knowledge base of the farmers on animal husbandry and delivered more value to agro-dealers in creating demand for their products. Therefore, the poster (Figure 6) suggested the establishment of a strategic alliance between business-focused agrodealers and qualified service providers/extension agents to access geographically clustered farmers via cooperatives. The ANM approach is seen as a sustainable mechanism where cooperatives' members are clustered across villages, service providers are readily linked to the farmers and the farmers appreciate the value of improved husbandry. Rumen8 -a tool to specify total mixed rations Unbalanced feeds for cows are prevalent across Tanzania, which has led to the low productivity of cows. Allowing cows to access adequate nutrients is key to exploiting the maximum production potential of animals. Limited tools exist to optimally ration feed through the best combination of available feedstuffs. Rumen8 is a tool that is widely used for rationing feed in countries with developed dairy production such as Australia. The tool was improved by including tropical feedstuffs that fitted in the smallholder dairy context. The tool uses traffic lights to identify the required level of a nutrient that could compound TMRs using available feedstuff at minimum cost and set production levels. The Rume8 tool can easily be downloaded and installed in smartphones free of charge. The tool is versatile with up to 230 feedstuff options relevant for tropical context. The tool is ideal for use by enterprising youth and producers of dairy rations.Integrated Manure Management (IMM) preserves nutrients for crops, prevents transmission of certain diseases, reduces detrimental environmental effects of manure (greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions and pollution of water), and offers economic benefits through biogas for cooking fuel and lighting (replacing firewood and charcoal). The agro-dealers and extension agents are best suited for the delivery of flexi-biogas units and training to the farmers. IMM is suitable for livestock-keeping households in all agro-ecological conditions, free-range systems, deep litter systems, mixed crop, and dairy farming systems.East Coast fever (ECF) is a major constraint to improving livestock productivity in Tanzania. This disease is responsible for about two-thirds of calf mortality in the country and is more serious in improved breeds than in zebu breeds. The Infection and Treatment Method (ITM) vaccine against ECF, following a single vaccination, give life-long immunity to cattle and reduces mortality by 95%. ITM also allows smallholder farmers to keep improved dairy animals in ECF endemic areas with a considerably reduced risk of loss. The agrovet dealers, AI service providers, producer organizations, and private veterinarians were identified as the best-suited facilitators in the delivery of the ITM vaccine.Cost of feed is the most important variable in rearing dairy cattle. The feed consumed by the dairy cattle is used for milk production and maintenance of the body. The quantity and type of feed consumed by the dairy cattle also influence the composition of milk. Therefore, countries such as New Zealand, Netherlands, Finland and the United Kingdom (UK) have developed indices for dairy cattle that reduce feed intake by constraining animal body size. For the first time in Tanzania, the body weight of mature animals was evaluated to get their genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) for genomic prediction under the Africa Dairy Genetic Gains (ADGG) project. By using the results of GEBVs for milk production and body weight, the ADGG project developed an index to allow for the selection of animals that improve the rate of milk production but keep body weight constant. The CRP Livestock researchers leveraged the genomic evaluations conducted under ADGG in testing integrated packages. The resultant higher producing crossbred and purebred dairy sires were publicized for use through dairy cooperatives, dairy agri-entrepreneurs, and other value chain actors.The environmental footprints (land, soils, water use, GHG emissions) of the intensive livestock production system are a big challenge. A stakeholder workshop around environmental management opportunities was held that highlighted the scarcity of research on environmental aspects of livestock production in the country. The stakeholders emphasized synergizing livelihood and environmental objectives and called for sustainable livestock intensification through improved feed and forage to reduce the ecological footprint of, and improve, livestock production. The stakeholders recommended that the research be embedded in appropriate financial incentives, institutional settings, and capacity building of involved stakeholders. Tropical forages were considered an excellent case to explore and demonstrate research on multidimensional impacts and trade-offs compared with mixed crop-livestock systems (Paul et al. 2020a). So, the drivers, barriers, and incentives required to create an enabling environment for uptake and adoption of tropical forage technologies required accelerated research attention.Evidence on climate and soil co-benefits of improved forage grasses was generated through biophysical research by employing integrated modelling techniques and quantitative review methods. The biophysical research was conducted at various sites of Tanzania to explore the co-benefits of the improved planted forages such as Napier and Brachiaria grasses. The climate benefits included a reduction in greenhouse gas emission intensity, increase in soil organic carbon, reduction in soil erosion, and positive nutrient balances (Paul et al. 2020b).Public and private investors in the dairy sector collaborated in the implementation of the integrated interventions. Key government officials were engaged to review initial results of ex-ante modelling of environmental impacts and to prioritize opportunities for scaling environmental management interventions in the dairy sector. SNV was engaged through their project on empowering women and youth for income and employment in Kilimanjaro; Solidaridad through their project on climatesmart dairy farming in Tanga; Abt Associates through their evaluation role in the AgResults Dairy Productivity Challenge Project, a multi-donor initiative promoting the uptake of bundled inputs and services; Land O Lakes V37 through their roles in both the AgResults project and the Dairy Nourishes Africa initiative, and a multi-donor initiative through the Global Dairy Platform composed of dairy companies, associations, scientific bodies and other partners that collaborate on responsible food production and sustainable agriculture.• Capacitated agri-entrepreneurs who are excited about new business prospects as they engage in the delivery of demanddriven technology packages. Evaluations of the incubation process ranked the program content and participatory approaches used in training as 'very good and effective'. The effectiveness was partly enabled by co-learning and exchange with facilitators on gender-responsive training facilitated by the Dutch Royal Tropical Institute (KIT). The boot camps that crystallized this excitement involved 66 participants, including 50 agri-entrepreneurs who were selected from pilot project sites. About 42% were women and 60% youth aged 19-35 years (31 from Kilimanjaro and 19 from Tanga) and District Livestock and Fisheries Officers (DLFOs) from project districts and a consortium of facilitators/trainers took part.• Easy and quick access to digital course contents on calving and milk hygiene, which were uploaded at the learning portal and web apps, attracted the people already engaged in dairying and agriculture farming. These apps have made a significant contribution in raising awareness and imparting skills amongst the smallholder livestock keepers to deliver clean, safe, and quality milk to the distributors and ultimate consumers.• Higher producing crossbred and purebred sires have been identified through genomic evaluation of dairy cattle. The technology has allowed for the provision of high-producing dairy sires to dairy farmers through dairy cooperatives, agrientrepreneurs, and other value chain actors.• Rural commercialization has become part of the core of the national agricultural development strategy of the country. The partners' engagement to influence policy and invest for scaling innovations, and the role of empowered agri-entrepreneurs to act as glue for integration of demand-driven technology packages have earned acceptability at both government and private levels.• The public and private sector partners are engaged from identification, composition, and scaling assessment of integrated packages to their implementation at different levels. The areas of engagement include digital solution services, bundling and delivery of technology packages, capacity building of partners, and learning and knowledge management. This approach is serving the intended purpose and seems an effective arrangement for the sustainability of introduced interventions.• High milk-producing forages are identified based on the locally available feed options that are a cheap source of quality feed for smallholder dairy farmers. This has provided economically viable feed and forage options for the smallholder farmers.• In Tanzania, delivery and enabling packages were designed for dairy groups and development change agents, respectively. Packages covered integrated technical products, delivery mechanisms, services, and know-how/knowledge about the technology uptake through capacity building interventions. Going for such a comprehensive package required identification of multi-level stakeholders, development of a coordination and consultation mechanism, and provision of a common platform to access, interact, and be informed of the progress and latest developments in the dairy value chain. The multistakeholder engagement in the process of identification and scaling up of technologies, through stakeholders' workshops, provided platforms for actors, facilitators, and enablers to interact and exchange their views, thoughts, and limitations to reach mutually acceptable, doable, and sustainable solutions. The technical approach, adopted in scaling scan assessment of the identified and piloted technical products remained instrumental in the selection of scalable technologies. Additionally, the technologies identified and scaled up through such a large-scale consultation earned more acceptability and adoptability amongst the stakeholders that were engaged in the livestock value chain.• The data-driven digital platform for e-extension services and training of the dairy value chain actors remained instrumental in accessing information and knowledge for the producers and other dairy value chain actors. The sustainability of such a platform has yet to be ensured after the withdrawal of project support. The engagement of the private sector in the development, troubleshooting, and operationalization of the digital platform has provided a good opportunity to look for a mechanism that ensures the current level of stakeholders' coordination as well as the financial viability of the digital innovation introduced by the project. Moreover, there is a need to look at the synchronization of the database/information with the country-level databases to use for the development of a national-level dairy and agriculture development strategy.• As opposed to the use of simple illustrations, the use of photos in the digital course content on calving management and milk hygiene emerged as a key drivers for engagement of the value chain actors and the producers. However, based on users' feedback, continuous improvement in the training contents and creation of new course materials are required to meet the changing needs and demands of the users. Moreover, digital marketing has proved to be a cheap and effective way to recruit new users in online training. But the consistent follow-up is required to re-engage the users who have not completed their courses. So, automation of the follow-up for re-engagement of the users via SMS and in-app notifications is required to derive course completion.• Systematic reviews and experimentation during the life of the project helped to determine the existing state of feed and forages in the project sites and explore the potential economical feed and forage options. Eventually, the focus on the improved and locally grown forages and feed options greatly reduced the cost of feeding dairy animals. It also created business avenues for women and youth to develop seed businesses for locally grown improved forages.• Joint platforms for the private and public sector actors who are interested and involved in forage seed production are vital to address the challenges of seed availability and exploring potential for seed production. The training and technical support to the commercial growers on seed production, purity, and handling are equally essential.In Vietnam, 12 million households are engaged in livestock production, most of which is by smallholder farmers. Between 1990 and 2019, Vietnam's cattle (beef and dairy), goat, pig, poultry, and sheep populations increased, while those of buffalo and horses decreased slightly. In 2017, poultry comprised 91.6% of Vietnam's total livestock population, followed by pigs (6.5%), cattle (beef and dairy) (1.34%), and buffalo (0.59%). The average annual growth rate of Vietnam's livestock sector between 2007 and 2017 was 4.92% (General Statistical Office of Vietnam 2019a). The consumption of livestock productsespecially pork, cow milk, and eggs-increased dramatically between 2010 and 2020, with growth rates in Vietnam leading all countries in the Southeast Asian region (World Bank Group 2016). The total production quantity of meat in the country has increased by 152% between 2007 and 2016, from 3.29 to 5.02 million tons. The production of cattle and poultry meat products has grown 174% faster than the average output of all animal populations, equivalent to 8.6% per year over the same period. In terms of quantity, pork comprises 73.0% of total livestock production, with 3.7 million tons produced in 2019. However, this is down 25.5% from the previous year due to the spread of African swine fever. In the same year, poultry accounted for 960,000 tons, or 19.1% of total livestock production, while meat products from buffalo and beef comprised 6.1% and 1.7%, respectively (General Statistical Office 2019b).The country is deficient in feed and imports 3 million tons of it per year for livestock. The prevalence of poverty is 2.7 times higher (70%) in the Northwest (NW) region than that in the rest of the country. More than one-third (35%) of the children in the region have stunted growth. The ethnic minorities make up 80% of the total population in the NW region comprising nearly 30 groups, mainly Tay, Thai, Hmong, and Dao. Over 94% of the land is sloping land, in which 87% is above 25°. The province of Son La, in the NW, was selected for the project due to the high density of ethnic minorities, high levels of relative poverty, high livestock density, and pressing problems of environment, market, and livestock production.The district of Mai Son offers a diversity of farm types from grazing and extensive systems at the top of mountains to intensive farms, integrated with crop-livestock, at the bottom valleys. The commonly reared livestock species include buffaloes, beef cattle, pigs, goats and poultry. In a baseline survey conducted in early 2020, livestock species ownership did not differ among farm types, with nearly all farms owning chicken, around 50% owning cattle and 50% owning pigs (Hammond et al. 2021). The livestock is fed on natural grazing areas, planted forages, maize, cassava, sugar cane, and natural forest. There is a wide variety of socio-economic and ecological conditions that can broadly be categorized into three types;• An intensive system with good access to market and relatively better capacity for innovation• Mixed crop-livestock systems• Remote extensive systems with low access to the market.Li-chăn, the 'Livestock-led interventions towards equitable livelihoods and improved environment in the North-West Highlands of Vietnam,' the Livestock CRP priority country project in Vietnam, aims at stimulating system transformation (livelihoods, environment, equity, and market access) to empower highland farming communities through bundled livestockbased interventions in the NW highlands. The project, short-named 'Li-chăn', which means 'livestock is good' in the local language, is characterized by a system and landscape approach, a focus on multiple species (large ruminants and local pigs), and community-based activities in agreement with government plans. The project's theory of change is shown in Figure 7.The specific objectives of the project are:• To intensify equitable and sustainable smallholder crop-livestock production through °identifying, testing, and evaluating bundled livestock-based interventions°improving knowledge and skills in animal husbandry °increasing awareness of environmental degradation• To identify, facilitate and evaluate institutional innovations that stimulate local livestock product development, market linkages, and effective service delivery for sustainable commercialization benefiting equitably to all gender and ethnic groups.• To identify and promote inclusive inter-sectoral environment and agriculture policy dialogue and interactions at different levels that address trade-offs and synergies and lead to more conducive and effective policy attention to smallholder croplive-stock systems. Aligned with the three farming systems in the NW region of the country, different bundles of interventions were identified for intensive systems in the lowlands, mixed crop-livestock systems in the mid-altitudes, and extensive systems in the high altitudes. Having better market access and innovation capacity, market-driven interventions were identified for lowlands to produce branded, healthy, and sustainable 'green' livestock-source products. The intervention package included farmers' training on livestock breeds, breeding, animal health, and biosecurity; ii) capacity building of animal health professionals; iii) introduction of improved livestock feeding practices and their evaluation; and vi) capacity building of farmers in nutrient management. Interventions were also supplemented by the Comprehensive Livestock Environment Assessment for Improved Nutrition, Secured Environment and Sustainable Development (CLEANED) approach, and awareness-raising on environmental issues. Further, market research to assess the potential demand for high-value livestock products and participatory identification of suitable value chain interventions at farm and market levels were made part of the project interventions.The integration approach for the identified interventions included shared activities by stocktaking, diagnosis, activity planning, baselining, common monitoring and evaluation, and engagement of local authorities and community. Inter-flagship collaboration, having common farming systems' understanding considering multiple indicators, and common beneficiaries, were made at field-level.A rapid multi-indicator survey was carried out in 622 households to establish a baseline of the targeted indicators in the Mai Son District (Hammond et al. 2021). The survey tool, the Rural Household Multi-Indicator Survey (RHoMIS), was built on specific indicators related to AI, breeding, African swine fever (ASF), animal health, veterinary care, feed-basket, and feeding practices, and soil fertility management. Local partners and authorities jointly selected villages, activities, and communities for interventions.Particular attention was given to choosing the animals' genetics, both at the breed and individual level, to produce the animals that are productive and adapted to the local environmental conditions. The project gave a subsidy of up to 1,000 inseminations to different groups of communities at different times. The genetic interventions also focused on building capacity on cattle and pig AI at the levels of AI service provision, semen provision, and smallholder use of AI as a breeding strategy. To that end, a series of training sessions were held, supported by training material developed for the local context and inclusive of material in the local language of the Hmong ethnic minority. Training, related to cattle and pig breeds and breeding was delivered to 125 farmers (51% women, 44% Hmong ethnicity). Similarly, training on AI in pigs and cattle, boar semen collection, and preparation for AI were attended by 73 persons (52% women,15% Hmong ethnicity), including veterinary workers, and boar and bull keepers. From the training on cattle AI, 19 persons (7 women) were accredited as AI service providers. Additionally, 3 Ban (local breed) boars breeders were trained for semen collection.The farmers were trained on biosecurity, the use of vaccines and antibiotics, and farm management. The animal health professionals were oriented on common animal diseases, biosecurity, vaccines and antibiotics, outbreak investigation and management, and risk communication. Around 110 farmers attended the training with 50% being females from the project sites.Fifteen demo farms were established in the six target villages, with frequent monitoring through farmers diaries. Some farmers are willing to invest in farm renovation (e.g. construction of new pen and water system). A KAP survey showed that animal health control measures (e.g. biosecurity and farm management) were more practised after than before the training sessionsThe Gendered Feed Assessment Tool (G-FEAST) was conducted in six intervention villages to identify feed opportunities and constraints among different household types concerning feeding practices and uptake of feed interventions. One hundred and thirty-seven (137) people participated in 24 focus group discussions and 110 individual interviews were conducted with key informants. Based on the G-FEAST assessment, feed basket options were tailored for different types of farming systems.The options covered integration of legumes in trees' plantations, rotation of staple crop fields, and introduction of improved grasses. Appropriate solutions for winter storage of fodder were also provided to the farmers and their impact tested based on key indicators of sustainable intensification domains.Improved livestock management and productivity in Mai Son La can be achieved through better feed management and increased cultivation of improved forages, to meet animal nutrition demand. A study was conducted by Atieno et al. ( 2021) aimed at assessing feed intervention strategies to address context-specific feed-related challenges, mainly winter-feed shortage for improved animal nutrition and livestock productivity. These interventions included promoting the uptake of improved forage varieties (grasses and legumes) and capacity building on animal nutrition techniques including feed processing and preservation, feed mix and feeding regimes for cattle and pigs.One hundred and forty-five ( 145) farmers (70 men and 75 women) from across six intervention villages participated in animal nutrition training sessions, which included both theoretical overviews through poster presentations and practical demonstrations.Poster presentations were also done to introduce selected forage varieties as well as their environmental benefits. After the training, willing farmers selected forage varieties from those proposed and were provided with seeds and planting materials to grow on their farms. The proposed varieties included four types of grass (Mulato II, Mombasa guinea, green elephant grass and Ubon paspalum), and three legumes (Ubon stylo, Arachis pintoi and rice bean). These varieties were selected as they are high yielding, high quality and cold-tolerant, characteristics best suited to address feed challenges in the study area. Farmer-led field trials were set up with a total of 155 farmers across the six villages. Field demonstrations on different ways of growing forages were conducted in each village, after which the farmers applied the same techniques in their farms. A total of 25 ha were planted with improved forages, a significant increase in the area grown with forages from 0.01-0.02 ha per household to about 0.05 ha per household. Data collected during trial monitoring and follow-ups reported increased farmers' awareness of feed technologies, increased biomass yield, and availability of high-quality feed for their livestock.By the end of 2021, training on erosion control, soil fertility and biomass recycling, as well as animal manure and crop residue composting was given to 145 farmers in the six villages of project intervention. The CLEANED assessment revealed that high nitrogen mining and erosion are key issues in the Mai Son district (Douxchamps et al. 2021). A nitrogen flow study on six case study farms showed that nitrogen balances were positive in high and middle access farms, with 35 to 177 kg N/ha. In contrast, the balances were negative in the most remote farms, with -18 kg N/ha in average. The application of mineral fertilizer was a key game changer, accounting for an average of 83% of the N inputs across the six farms. The burning of crop residues contributed strongly to nutrient losses, especially on remote farms. The nitrogen recycling intensity was 13% on average, except for one farm which produced a lot of its livestock feed and reached a nitrogen recycling intensity (NRI) of 64%. Proper manure management, and production and use of improved forages are recommended across the systems. The addition of cover crops and contour farming is highly recommended in highland areas to improve soil water retention and minimize erosion. The use of organic inputs should be encouraged and burning should be avoided, especially on sloping lands. Legume species should be better integrated into the system, for example as multipurpose forages (Douxchamps et al. 2021).A market study was conducted to understand current market structures and interactions amongst the value chains of the targeted livestock species (large ruminants, local pigs), and to identify opportunities for standardized and specialized livestock products. In that regard, 10 FGDs with producers and 20 key KIIs with downstream value chain actors were conducted. The study findings identified the need to link farmer groups directly to the preferred collectors/traders or butchers with more stable demand and better-offered prices. Based on the study findings, the project developed a mechanism to enhance direct linkages of the farmers' groups with the collectors or butchers to ensure consistent demand and competitive prices of their produce and products.The formation of common interest groups (CIGs) was facilitated by an experienced consultant. A series of introductory meetings were organized at different levels (district, commune, village) to convey the concept and benefits of CIGs and to identify the demand from local authorities and value chain actors towards this initiative. This was followed by two intensive training sessions on detailed steps of establishing and operating CIGs for the most enthusiastic farmers (three to five farmers selected in each village) and representatives of local associations (i.e. farmer unions, women unions). Thirty (30) participants joined these two sessions of training, of which 16 were males and 14 were females. After the training, they went back to their villages and invited others to be part of their community of interest. Five CIGs have been established in the study sites with the involvement of 60 farm households.Moreover, awareness of food safety, quality, and environmental footprints of livestock products was raised amongst the consumers and producers through the market research component.The International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) conducted a modelling exercise to assess the economic impact of ASF under different scenarios. The simulation model revealed that;• ASF outbreaks pose adverse impacts on national pork supply and demand, especially in the traditional sector. The national pig supply falls by nearly 27.8% in the traditional sector with 5% negative demand shock and by 33.2% with 20% negative demand shock in the simulated scenarios compared to the non-outbreak scenarios.• The modern sector is less likely to be affected and may even benefit from the ASF outbreak. Compared to the nonoutbreak scenarios, the national pig sector's income from the modern sector increases by 16.9% with 5% negative demand shock and by 14% with 20% negative demand shock in the simulated scenarios. The results are driven by the modern sector's strict biosecurity practices and high technology growth.• ASF outbreaks tend to accelerate the restructuring process of the pig industry towards the faster expansion of the commercial and modern pig sectors and the shrinking of the traditional sector.• Provision of subsidy and training to the farmers on AI have induced community-based AI practice in the project sites.Similarly, the safe handling of semen collection through training of AI service providers has minimized the losses of semen and the probability of failure in breeding buffaloes, cattle and pigs.• The beneficiary farmers of herd-health management intervention are better managing the health farm-related issues of their livestock. The long-term impacts of the intervention in terms of morbidity, mortality, and production are yet to be documented.• The identified and advised feed and forage options are being availed by the farmers in project sites. Appropriate storage solutions for feed and forages in the off-season (winter) are ensuring year-round availability of feed for livestock in the project sites.• A market mechanism has been established that ensures stable demand and competitive prices to the farmers' groups for their produce and products.• The findings that the ASF outbreaks are more likely to affect the traditional sector and accelerate restructuring of pig industry towards commercialization and modern sectors has triggered policy debate to create employment opportunities for smallholders to ensure sustainable livelihoods for them.• The photovoice tool was used to, among other things, stimulate discussions amongst farmers regarding the technologies disseminated in the project, spread word about the tool amongst the community members as well as attract the interest of local authorities to support further project interventions and scaling.• Scientific impact assessment of ASF outbreaks through simulation models helped informed decision-making for the formulation of national-level policies and strategies.• The awareness, knowledge, and inclination of the farmers towards value-added livestock products has remained instrumental in the development and growth of the off-farm industry and enterprises at the project site. This could accelerate economic activity in the target areas and create more livelihood opportunities for the smallholders and the community in the project areas.• Combining theory with field practice attracts ethnic farmers to attend the technical training courses.• The successful cases of pilots after training promoted local farmers and vet workers in the adoption of innovations.• From the demonstration farms, indicators such as productivity, mortality/morbidity rate, vaccination rates and use of antibiotics were used to review behaviour change.• There was a high preference for three grass varieties (Napier, Mombasa Guinea and Ubon paspalum) due to their high germination rate, biomass, and palatability and there was moderate preference for forage legumes (Ubon stylo, rice bean, Arachis pintoi) and Mulato II. Farmers have expressed willingness to expand the land area used to grow improved forages.• COVID-19-related restrictions limited follow-up to guide farmers on forage management and utilization. However, forage fact sheets were developed and adapted to address issues raised by farmers such as appropriate cutting time, feed mix and use.• Maintaining gender balance during flagship activities saw more female farmers actively participating in practical training sessions.• Proper manure management, and production and use of improved forages is recommended across the systems.• Production of improved forages can minimize water lost through evapotranspiration.• The addition of cover crops and contour farming is highly recommended in highland areas to improve soil water retention and minimize erosion.• Recycling of organic matter should be encouraged to improve soil fertility.• Residues burning should be avoided.• The use of appropriate approaches for involving active actors as change agents in the early stage of common interest groups (CIGs) should be emphasized.• Integration with other flagships is vital for laying a good foundation for the establishment of CIGs.• The need for capacity building for CIG members on developing CIGs.• Development of linkages among newly established CIGs for knowledge sharing and potential shared activities.• The involvement of local authorities is crucial for the sustainability of CIGs.4.1 SuccessesIn Uganda, the 'scoping study' and 'situation analysis of pig value chain' helped determine the existing mechanism for marketing of live pigs and pork; delivery of veterinary services, drugs and feeds to smallholder farmers; barriers and challenges to the drug stockists, feed processors and veterinary services providers; and operational environment for pig value chain actors. This evidence-based approach in setting up market arrangements guided targeted activities and actions that led to the development of profitable linkages between pig aggregators and pig producers. Similarly, a market study was used to guide decisions to enhance direct linkages of the farmers' groups with the collectors or butchers to ensure consistent demand and competitive price of their produce and products in Vietnam.Moreover, consultative approaches in the assessment of scaling readiness of best-bet technologies, through stakeholders' workshops, helped to thoroughly review the pros and cons of the technologies' scale-up, potential barriers in implementation, and opportunities for the actors involved to maximize the benefits from the technology in both Uganda and Tanzania. The scaling readiness approach guided the relevant stakeholders in working toward the sustainability of the assessed technological interventions.In Tanzania, delivery and enabling packages were designed for dairy groups and development change agents, respectively. Both technology packages covered integrated technical products, delivery mechanisms, services, and know-how/knowledge about the technology uptake through capacity-building interventions. Going for such a comprehensive package required identification of multi-level stakeholders, development of a coordination and consultation mechanism, and provision of a common platform to access, interact, and be informed of the progress and latest developments in the dairy value chain. The multi-stakeholders were engaged in the process of identification and scaling up of technologies through stakeholders' workshops that provided platforms for actors, facilitators, and enablers to interact and exchange their views, thoughts, and limitations to reach mutually acceptable, doable, and sustainable solutions. The technologies identified and scaled up through such a large-scale consultation earned more acceptability and adoptability amongst the stakeholders engaged in the livestock value chain.In Vietnam, a different approach was adopted for characterization, selection, and scaling of technologies and the intervention bundles were aligned with three different farming systems through G-FEAST assessment, forage seed system analysis, value chain mapping, and land use and forage suitability mapping. Similarly, market-driven interventions were identified for lowlands for having better market access and innovative capacity to produce and develop branded, healthy, and sustainable 'green' livestock-source products.In Uganda, a digital ecosystem, established in the form of a PigSmart platform, is providing multiple digital solutions to the growers, aggregators, and other value chain actors. One of these digital solutions is a 'feed calculator app' that is being used by the smallholder farmers and small-scale feed producers for the formulation of nutritious and balanced feed for livestock from the locally available cheap feed ingredients. Another app named 'gross margin calculator' is being used by the farmers to calculate the gross margin of their farming business through feeding input cost data and output prices. This app has succeeded to promote the concept of farming as a business entity amongst the smallholder farmers. Moreover, all the value chain actors have now access to information regarding production, produce, marketing, and financing through an e-commerce platform in the shape of an EzyAgric app that is embedded in the digital ecosystem, the PigSmart. PigSmart has proved to be beneficial to farmers in balancing feed for pigs and running profitable businesses. It also has been instrumental in accessing information and knowledge of the producers and other dairy value chain actors. Largely, introducing the digital solution to technical advisory services has strengthened the overall pig value chain system in the target areas. The aggregate demands of the farmers for inputs supplies and services have started to be delivered to the individual farmers and groups at the competitive market rate by the quality-assured resources.The data-driven digital platform for e-extension services and training of the dairy value chain actors has remained instrumental in accessing information and knowledge for the producers and other dairy value chain actors in Tanzania. Easy and quick access to digital course contents on calving and milk hygiene, which are uploaded on to the learning portal and web apps, has attracted those already engaged in dairying and crop farming. As opposed to the use of simple illustrations, the use of photos in the digital courses on calving management and milk hygiene has enhance the engagement of the value chain actors and producers throughout the courses. Moreover, digital marketing has proved to be a cheap and effective way to recruit new users and online training participants.Training and certification of small-scale feed producers in Uganda have succeeded to standardize the quality of commercial feed production and have induced more farmers to start using certified commercial feeds from small-scale producers. Moreover, the Feed Calculator app through the PigSmart digital platform in Uganda has promoted the concept of profitable businesses and the entrepreneurial mindset of small-scale pig farmers. In Tanzania, systematic reviews and experimentation helped to determine the existing state of feed and forages in the project sites and explore the potential economical feed and forage options. Eventually, the focus on the improved and locally-grown forages and feed options has greatly reduced the cost of feeding dairy animals. It also has created business avenues for women and youth to develop seed businesses in their locally grown improved forages.In Vietnam, the G-FEAST assessment guided the formulation of a feed-basket for cattle and pigs in different types of farming systems. The options covered, integration of legumes in trees' plantation, rotation of staple crops fields, and introduction of improved grasses. The feed-basket options were tailored after the G-FEAST assessment.The substantial involvement of public and private sector partners has been instrumental in the implementation of various components of the integrated package in Uganda. The partnerships have been established with digital solution service providers, capacity building service providers, academia, and government functionaries for the implementation and sustainability of interventions introduced by the projects. The engagement of the private sector in the development and troubleshooting, and operationalization of the digital platform has provided a good opportunity to find a mechanism that ensures sustainability of the current level of stakeholders' coordination and the financial viability of the digital innovation introduced by the project in both Uganda and Tanzania.Rural commercialization has become part of the core national agricultural development strategy of Tanzania. The partners' engagement to influence policy and invest in scaling innovations, and the role of empowered agri-entrepreneurs to act as a glue for integration of demand-driven technology packages have earned acceptance at both government and private levels. At the same time, in Vietnam scientific-based impact assessment of ASF outbreak through simulation models helped in informed decision-making for the formulation of national-level policies and strategies. 5 Final considerations and the way forward• Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, significant progress was seen in Uganda and Tanzania. In both countries, the technology bundles have been selected and rolled out. The learnings from both countries could be helpful for the project teams of Vietnam and Ethiopia to expedite the implementation of technology bundles. The strategies and procedures adopted in Uganda and Tanzania could provide a road map to follow with slight tailoring following the context and emerging situations of the remaining two countries struggling to implement the technology packages.• Experimental designs to see the impact of various interventions were proposed and planned in all four countries. The progress in this regard is not documented and reported by any country. There is a need to establish a baseline of outcome and results' level indicators to see the overtime improvement and ultimate impact after the program. There is a good opportunity for inter-countries comparison to see the enabling, contributing, and constraining factors in technology uptake, and achievement of intended outcomes and ultimate results.• There is no alternative to data-driven decision-making. The establishment of digital platforms in Uganda and Tanzania for advisory and e-extension services are steps towards the use of innovative techniques for informed decision-making. The way livestock value chain actors have shown interest and adopted the digital platform in Uganda and Tanzania is a landmark achievement, albeit, with room to increase the scope of digital services and sync them with the national databases for data-driven policy formulation and progress tracking. The rest of the countries need to follow the strategies devised and followed by Uganda and Tanzania for the establishment and uptake of digital solutions for advisory and e-extension services.• Community-based artificial insemination, though at a nascent stage in Vietnam, Uganda and Tanzania, is another potential intervention that can gain widescale adoptability by the smallholder farmers. The engagement of the private sector in AI service provision looks to be a sustainable arrangement for scaling up the intervention to enable as many farmers as possible to get the benefit.• Though the overall focus is on the improvement of smallholders through enhanced productivity of livestock, the targeted type of livestock varies across the laboratory countries (the interventions are targeting piggery in Uganda, dairy animals in Tanzania, pigs and cattle in Vietnam, and small ruminants in Ethiopia). With varying genetic requirements for different livestock types, the cross-country comparison of progress in the achievement of specific output and outcome level indicators seems difficult. However, the variation in the best practices and adopted strategies for uptake of technologies across the laboratory countries would be the most relevant yardsticks to gauge the success of the projects across countries.","tokenCount":"17211"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0250687302.json b/data/part_2/0250687302.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce4b6078e2d81cc1493fb1c5a152667525d42ec7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0250687302.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"cab2f0ab5376dbe89aa56a54b76879a2","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/1e7be133-0bbb-4b1f-ac28-4ce8bdfe79b0/retrieve","id":"-1671076264"},"keywords":["Coffee cultivars","compound fertilizer","leaf area index","planting density","specific leaf area"],"sieverID":"4e0154ed-79a5-4494-8b33-2252bd93f5c7","pagecount":"5","content":"Leaf trait is good predictors of plant performance. It is closely associated with light requirement, growth and survival of the plant. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of seedling planting density and fertilizer rate on leaf traits variation of two Arabica coffee cultivars under nursery conditions. It was conducted at Jimma Agricultural Research Center from (February 29 to October 29), 2018. A factorial experiment was used and treatments were arranged using completely randomized design with three replications. Treatments consisted of combinations of two Arabica coffee cultivars (74110 and 75227), four population densities (one, two, three and four plants per polythene tube) and three compound NPK (22:6:12 + Te) rates (control, 5g and 10g). The results showed that interaction between cultivar, population density and fertilizer was significantly (P ≤ 0.05) influenced LN, LPR and LAI, and highly significantly (P ≤ 0.01) influenced LWR and SLA. High planting density (PD2) with 5g of NPK enhanced LN and LPR in cultivar-74110 while conventional (PD1) with 5g of NPK enhanced LN and LPR in cultivar-75227. Highest value of LWR was recorded from high planting density (PD2) with 5g of NPK while maximum value of LAI and SLA was recorded from high planting density (PD3) with 5g of NPK for both cultivars. At early field planting time, coffee seedling with higher LAI and SLA are very important for efficiently capture and better utilization of solar energy or light as well as increase seedling growth. In general, planting high population density (PD3) and fertilized with 5 g of NPK seems sufficient to improve LAI and SLA of coffee seedlings. Therefore, the future research direction should be focused on the management for increase leaf traits under field conditions.Coffee is one of the cash crops for millions of small farmers and other actors in developing countries including Ethiopia. However, its productivity is influenced by quality of planting material, field management and fertility of the soil. Leaf is a part of a plant that have several uses and benefits to man. It is the food-making organ of plants in the process of photosynthesis. It is an important variable used to predict photosynthetic primary production, evapo -transpiration and as a reference tool for crop growth. Leaf traits are good predictors of plant performance. It is closely associated with growth, survival and light requirement of the plant (Poorter and Bongers, 2006). Pervious results indicated that morphophysiological and chemical leaf traits vary in response to differences in shade management and nutrients (Buchanan et al., 2019). Light is one of the crucial factors for the growth and development of plants. Plants respond to changing light conditions by adjusting a suite of morphological and physiological traits.At high planting density, competition for light increase leaf weight ratio of plants (John et al., 2005). Higher leaf area index observed for coffee plants growing under shade indicated that these plants have higher potential for CO 2 assimilation and dry matter production, because of leaves adjust to the light environment under which they expand and develop. Increase in leaf area index with increase in plant density is important for better utilization of solar energy (Amanullah et al., 2008). Specific Leaf Area (SLA) is a key functional trait of plants underlying variation in growth rate. It is a major trait in leaf economics spectrum, which reflects the range of fast to slow returns on nutrient and dry mass investment in leaves (Wright et al., 2004;Flores et al., 2014). Coffee plants grown under shade or low-light develop thinner leaves, wider, a larger leaf area and higher SLA which allow more efficient capture of light energy (Poorter, 1999). These modifications allow them to efficiently capture and utilize the available light energy in order to increase their dry matter production. Coffee plants increased SLA which contributed for the higher rate of photosynthesis (Adugna et al., 2011). Coffee seedlings undertake certain morphological modifications and physiological adaptations for increase photosynthetic rate under high population density. In addition to genotype, water and nutrient have also makedifferences on leaf trait parameter. The increases of leaf traits are very important at early field establishment because it facilitate food making process by increase the efficiency of light capture, utilize light, maximize carbon gain and assimilate. Therefore, the experiment was conducted with the objective to evaluate the effect of planting density and fertilizer rate on leaf traits variation of two Arabica coffee cultivars under nursery conditions.The study was carried out at the Jimma Agricultural Research Centre (JARC) in southwestern Ethiopia under nursery for eight month from (February 29 to October 29), 2018. It is located at 7° 46' N latitude and 36° 0' E longitude and at an altitude of 1753 meter above sea level. The site receives high amount of rainfall with a mean total of 1556.9 mm per annum. Its mean minimum and maximum temperature are 12.77 ℃ and 26.14 ℃, respectively.The study was carried out using a factorial experiment arranged in completely randomized design with three replications. The treatments consisted of two released Arabica coffee cultivars that represent contrasting growth habits of compact ( 74110) and open (75227), four plant population densities (one, two, three and four plants per polythene tube) and three compound NPK rates (control, 5g and 10g). Compound NPK fertilizer (22: 06: 12 +Te) with 22% total N, 6% P 2 O 5 , 12% K 2 O and trace elements (Te) including 4% S, 0.15% B, 0.15% Zn and 0.002% Mo was used. Hence, twenty-four treatment combinations (2*3*4) were used for the study.The growth medium was prepared from top soil (0-30 cm depth) from Jimma (Melko) and sand at 3:1 ratios was used. A conventional black polythene tube with size of (12 cm diameter and 22 cm length) was used and 2kg of the soil medium mix was filled, arranged on seed beds and irrigated prior to seed sowing. For each treatment, six polythene tubes were used per plot and the prepared seed from selected of coffee genotypes were sown on each polythene tube following the designed planting density. At two pair of true leaves, the compound NPK fertilizer rates were applied to each pot using ring basal method. All the routine pre-and postsowing nursery operations including mulching, watering, shading and weed control were uniformly applied as recommended (Tesfaye et al., 2005).Leaf Number (LN): Total number of true leaves was counted at six pairs of leaves.It refers to number of leaves produced over a period of time. It was counted at two and six pairs of leaves from two plants. It was estimated as described by (Suarez, 2010). LPR = (Ln2-Ln1)/(t2-t1), where, LPR = Leaf production rate, Ln1 and Ln2 are number of leaves produced at time t1 and t2, respectively.Leaf Weight Ratio (LWR): It is expressed as the dry weight of leaves to whole plant dry weight. Three polythene tubes of coffee seedlings from each treatment were used for leaf dry and plant dry and it was taken at six pair of leaves. It was estimated as described by (Kvet et al., 1971). LWR = LDW/PDW, where, LWR, LDW and PDW are leaf weight ratio, leaf dry weight and plant dry weight, respectively, and expressed in g g -1 .Leaf Area Index (LAI): It was estimated as described by (Antonio et al., 2016 cited Oliveira andMesquita, 2008). LAI = RGR*(LA/PDW), where, LAI is leaf area index, RGR is relative growth rate, LA and PDW are leaf area and plant dry weight, respectively. Specific Leaf Area (SLA): Is the ratio of leaf area of the plant to its leaf dry weight. Three polythene tube of seedlings from each treatment for leaf dry weight and two plants for leaf area were used. It was estimated as described by (Kvet et al., 1971). SLA = LA/LDW, where, SLA, LA and LDW are specific leaf area, leaf area and leaf dry weight and expressed in cm 2 g -1 .Statistical Analysis: All relevant data was summarized and subjected to three way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SAS 9.3 version (SAS, 2011). Treatment mean separation was done by least significant difference (LSD) at 5% probability level.The analysis of variance revealed that the three way interaction effect of coffee genotype, population density and fertilizer rate was highly significant (P ≤ 0.01) for LWR and SLA, whereas significant (P ≤ 0.05) for LN, LPR and LAI (Table 1).Leaf Number and Leaf Production Rate: The result indicated that both LN and LPR were highly significantly (P ≤ 0.01) affected by population density and fertilizer rate (Table 1). It was observed that maximum values of 11.66 and 11.33 for LN were recorded for 74110*PD2*5g of NPK and 75227*PD1*5g of NPK, respectively, while lowest values of LN was recorded from treatment combinations of 74110*PD1*10g of NPK (4) and 75227*PD1*10g of NPK (6) for cultivar-74110 and 75227. The maximum values were 191.5% and 88.8% increment in LN over lowest values in cultivar-74110 and 75227, respectively (Table 2). Similarly, treatment combinations of 74110*PD2*5g of NPK and 75227*PD1*5g of NPK resulted in maximum of LPR with the respective values of 0.094 and 0.091 which were by 394.7% and 133.3% higher than the respective lowest values (0.019 and 0.039 for 74110*PD1*10g of NPK and 75227*PD1*10g of NPK for cultivar-74110 and 75227) (Table 2). Higher values of LN and LPR were recorded for higher planting density (PD2) treated with 5g of NPK for cultivar 74110. This might be due to with adequate supply of N, which enhanced leaf growth of coffee seedlings at high planting density. This result was in agreement with some previous study indicated that adequate supply of N would promote rapid plant development through increase in number of leaves (Malavolta, 1986). Maximum values for LN and LPR were recorded for 5g of NPK in all treatment combinations, with 16.6% and 8.8% increments for LN and 20.51% and 12.34% increments for LPR over the control for cultivar-74110 and 75227, respectively. Leaf Weight Ratio: The result revealed that LWR was highly significantly (P ≤ 0.01) influenced by coffee cultivar, population density and fertilizer rate (Table 1), where maximum value (0.545 g g -1 ) of LWR was recorded for 74110*PD2*5g of NPK and the minimum value of (0.33 g g -1 ) for 74110*PD1*10g of NPK for cultivar-74110. Similarly, maximum value (0.59 g g -1 ) of LWR was recorded for 75227*PD2*5g of NPK, whereas the minimum (0.34 g g -1 ) for 75227*PD1*10g of NPK for cultivar-75227 (Table 3). The maximum values were exhibited 65.2% and 73.5% higher LWR than their respective lowest values for cultivar-74110 and 75227, respectively. Higher LWR with higher planting density rather than with the single seedling in polythene tube might be related to competition for light with more dry matter accumulation in the leaves. Application of 5g of NPK resulted in 16.7% and 34.77% higher LWR over the control, and 11.45% and 31.77% higher values over the plots treated with 10g of NPK for cultivar-74110 and 75227, respectively. High LWR means partitioning of a large proportion of biomass to leaves (John et al., 2005). In higher population density a higher LWR and SLA may improve competitive ability of species (Hendrik, 2016). The result of the present study was also in agreement with the findings of Poorter (1999) who reported that plants shaded by other trees produce thinner, larger and wider leaves and have higher LWR than un-shaded plants.Leaf Area Index: LAI was highly significantly (P ≤ 0.01)affected by coffee cultivar, population density and fertilizer rate (Table 1), where the highest values of 2.88 and 3.32 were recorded for 74110*PD3*5g of NPK and 75227*PD3*5g of NPK for cultivar-74110 and 75227, respectively, respectively (Table 3). It was 569.85% and 577.55% higher than the respective lowest values for cultivar-74110 and 75227, respectively. The differences in LAI of cultivars might be related with variations in morphological growth habit, due to genotypic differences (Mohammed et al., 2015). This results in line with Sobrado (2005) who reported that the diversified growth habits of Arabica coffee genotypes influence LAI. Leaf is an important source in manufacturing photo assimilates and an increase in LAI results in better utilization of solar energy and enhanced growth of coffee seedlings. Higher LAI was recorded for high planting density (PD3) with 5g of NPK for both cultivars, with 10.34% to 24.34% increment over single seedling (PD1), which might related with production of more leave area with increasing seedling number. Application of 5g of NPK more enhanced LAI than the other fertilizer treatments; as N increases vegetative growth especially number of leaves and leaf area, and resulted in 154.8% and 98.8% higher LAI over the control, and it was decreased by 53.8% and 42.8% with application of 10g of NPK to cultivar-74110 and 75227, respectively. This might be related with toxicity problems with excess amount of fertilizer. The highest LAI was recorded from main factors of population density3 (PD3) due to mutual shading and 5g of NPK (Table 4). Optimum LAI is very important, as both below and above the critical level may not allowed maximum light interception by plants and yield may even tend to decline due to shading and competition for water, nutrients and light (Taye and Burkhardt, 2015).Specific Leaf Area: The result indicated that SLA was significantly (P ≤ 0.05) affected by coffee cultivar, were also highly significantly (P ≤ 0.01) for SLA difference due to population density and fertilizer rate (Table 1). It was observed that maximum value (186.93 cm 2 g -1 ) of SLA was recorded for 74110*PD3*5g of NPK, whereas the minimum value (139.8 cm 2 g -1 ) was recorded for 74110*PD1*10g of NPK for cultivar-74110. Similarly, the highest of (191.77 cm 2 g -1 ) SLA was recorded for cultivar-75227 with PD3 and 5g of NPK, whereas the lowest value (131.73 cm 2 g -1 ) was recorded for combination of 75227*PD1*10g of NPK for cultivar-75227 (Table 3). High planting density increased SLA, which was more enhanced with application of 5g of NPK that resulted in 13.17% and 15.3% increments over the control and 21.3% and 24.2% increments over 10g of NPK for cultivar-74110 and 75227, respectively. The highest SLA was recorded from main factors of population density3 (PD3) due to mutual shading and 5g of NPK (Table 4). High planting density increase SLA, might be related to the tendency of plants to efficient utilized the limited light penetrating through the canopy due to mutual shading. It could be also attributed to morphological modification of plants growing under shade to adapt to available low light intensity (Hiwot, 2011). Similarly, it has been reported that plants shaded by other trees produce larger, thinner and wider leaves, and have higher SLA (Poorter, 1999). Coffee plants grown under shade develop thinner leaves and a larger leaf area which allow more efficient capture of light energy. At low light, plants increase light interception by means of a high biomass allocation to leaves and formation of thin leaves with a high SLA. Both SLA and LAI may vary with light intensity, as higher SLA has been observed for plant under low light condition (Taye, 2006). This modification allows them to efficiently capture and utilize the available light energy in order to increase their dry matter production (Li et al., 2005).Leaf traits are good predictors of plant performance. It is closely associated with growth, survival and light requirement of the plant. Result indicated that there was significant increase in LN and LPR due to planting density in cultivar-74110, whereas sowing one seed per polyethylene tube and fertilized with 5g of NPK promote LN and LPR in cultivar-75227. Maximum value of LWR was recorded from sowing two seeds per polythene tube and fertilized with 5g of NPK in both cultivars. It was observed that sowing three seeds per polythene tube and fertilized with 5g of NPK was significantly increased LAI and SLA in both cultivars, but, higher increments was observed in cultivar-75227. In general, at early field transplanting stage a seedling with larger leaf traits are important for capture and utilize light as well as potential for CO 2 assimilation and faster growth rate; sowing three seeds per polythene tube and fertilized with 5g of NPK was enhanced LAI and SLA of coffee seedlings in both cultivars. Therefore, the future research direction should be focused on management to increase the coffee leaf traits for efficient utilization of light under field conditions.and Mohammed Aman for their unlimited technical support during designing, implementing the treatments and data recording time.","tokenCount":"2729"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0254451141.json b/data/part_2/0254451141.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad4d32c2818c228056a7d25d8458368d473e20f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0254451141.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"5ad7f396fe7c3eab0aa822a84d1382b3","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/3a32b9ee-37ee-4fca-b6c3-535884657c0b/retrieve","id":"-1800749191"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"fbe8f042-2546-4a3e-b3d5-6fba1e105626","pagecount":"2","content":"Insurance projectIndex-Based Livestock Insurance (IBLI) is the world's first index-based insurance designed to protect vulnerable pastoralists in drought-stricken areas from losing their primary asset-livestock. First developed by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) to insure pastoralists in Kenya and Ethiopia, this specialized insurance product has had a considerable impact on the asset base and consumption activities of its intended beneficiariesnomadic populations living in an expansive area. However, despite its ability to deliver social and economic returns to a population-traditionally neglected by financial services firms-IBLI's uptake has been slower than expected.This case study demonstrates the opportunities and challenges emerging from the IBLI project. It explains the need to establish the product in locations with large vulnerable pastoralist populations and encourages students to consider and develop an IBLI growth strategy. Through the case study, students will consider various pressures from the market, governments, donors and partners related to IBLI's growth strategy and future sustainability. It was developed as part of a MBA program in microfinance for students interested in the management of international organizations and NGOs. It is also relevant to a range of other courses, including social entrepreneurship, 'bottom of the pyramid' expansion strategies, or introductory finance.The case study begins in East Africa, where an agricultural economist introduced a novel financial technology designed to help livestock herders living in some of Africa's harshest regions. Andrew Mude and his ILRI team of scientists lead the innovative IBLI project, which helps herders recover from severe droughts that devastate livestock assets and routinely leave pastoral communities destitute; livestock are critical assets for 'pastoralists', who depend on their animals, and regularly move hundreds of kilometres with their stock to track new pastures and water resources.As one of humankind's oldest forms of production, these communities produce food in otherwise unyielding environments. However, regular droughts in the Horn of Africa account for 75% of livestock deaths and routinely devastate pastoral communities, especially as the average herding household holds 100% of its productive assets in the form of livestock. Mude's ambition has been to find risk management strategies focused on providing complementary services that enhance pastoralist livelihoods.IBLI represents an exciting innovation by offering insurance to vulnerable rural smallholder farmers and livestock keepers and potentially reducing the climaterelated risks they face. Initial analyses of IBLI projects have shown that insured households experienced: a 25% reduction in likelihood of poor nutrition; a 36% reduction in 'distress sales' of livestock (selling livestock to provide quick income in times of hardship); and a 33% reduction in reliance on food aid when compared to uninsured households. These initial results suggest that IBLI provides a valuable safety net for vulnerable families, protecting them from having to take drastic measures during droughts.December 2015After the Kenya and Ethiopia launches in 2010 and 2012, the IBLI project has, however, experienced growing pains. Despite evidence of its effectiveness as a social welfare program, sales have been slow. This is likely due to a number of factors, including challenges with the insurance partners that implement the project and working with a clientele that can be difficult to reach and unfamiliar with IBLI's benefits.Mude and his team now need to decide how to further develop the IBLI project. In team discussions, Mude recognized that all team members want to ensure IBLI's growth and success, but they hold differing views about how that should be accomplished. The goal is clear: to grow IBLI. But when and how should this growth take place?Mude feels torn between two broad strategies: deepening the project within Kenya or broadening it out to new geographical areas. Much needs to be accomplished in Kenya, and the government there intends to introduce short-term insurance subsidies. Focusing on Kenya would also help develop a sustainable model that could be scaled up to new areas. However, many donors and team members are eager to expand the project to new countries with large, vulnerable pastoral populations.As ","tokenCount":"645"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0269435344.json b/data/part_2/0269435344.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..77116b8026896d37a3f3b4d0db8d20bd44add064 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0269435344.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"dd92b61d572bf671e41c24e51962eb5f","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/dd3b114f-631c-43a1-b7d8-c2792a44cc46/retrieve","id":"238165989"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"57fcf093-4f9c-4baf-b047-7936bd6885c3","pagecount":"28","content":"This study was carried out to identify successes and challenges associated with the utilization of the Rift Valley fever (RVF) Decision Support Tool (DST) in Kenya. The DST was developed by various stakeholders from government and non-government sectors following the 2006-07 outbreak of RVF in East Africa. It identifies events leading to the RVF outbreak, classified as decision points, and matches them with interventions that could be implemented at each point. Currently, the framework identifies 12 decision points 1 and 13 interventions 2 .Three activities were used in the study, namely, (1) a review of literature to describe systems/models that could be used with the DST and to identify how other frameworks/DSTs have been used to support disease control policies;(2) focus group discussions and key informant interviews involving decision-makers in the Department of Veterinary Services (DVS), local and international organizations, farmer groups etc. and (3) a stakeholder workshop to validate findings obtained and develop recommendations on ways of improving awareness and utilization of the framework. Three parameters were used to verify uptake and implementation of the framework: (i) Whether there had been an official recognition of the DST as a component of the RVF control policy in the DVS (this did not include other relevant departments, e.g. Public Health and the Zoonotic Disease Unit, because they were not included previously in the dissemination of DST).(ii) Level of utilization of the framework indicated by the proportion of key decision-makers that had the framework and the number of decision points that had been covered at any one time.(iii) Perceptions on the convenience of its application.An additional parameter -the ability of the DST to guide and promote good/effective responses -was considered at the design stage of the study but this was not used because, since the DST was developed and disseminated, there has not been an outbreak of RVF for it to be utilized in full (beyond the early warning stage). The review of literature described some of the systems and models that can be used with the DST. Some of these systems e.g. the Global Early Warning System (GLEWS), Africa Real Time Environmental Monitoring Information System and the webbased application of the Emergency Prevention System for Animal Health (EMPRES-i) of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) were regarded as being useful for staging the DST for they provide early warning signals that define the escalation of risk and hence a change in the decision level from normal to the early warning stage. Others such as risk maps generated from a range of statistical models would be useful for identifying risk zones where interventions suggested by the framework would be applied. The review also identified challenges associated with the implementation of decision support systems in general, e.g. technical issues on operationalization of the models, bureaucratic hoops and lack of incentives, culture, attitude and resource challenges. These issues were incorporated into data collection instruments for the focus group discussions and key informant interviews.Focus group discussions and key informant interviews were carried out between May and September 2012 in Nairobi, Garissa, Mombasa, and Nakuru while the stakeholder workshop was held in Naivasha, Kenya in September 2012. These surveys confirmed that the DST had been incorporated into the RVF contingency plan but less than 10% of the decision-makers, mostly from the provincial and district centres, were aware about the DST. Challenges associated with the utilization of the framework were classified into four categories namely: (i) resource/funding constraints, (ii) inefficient response measures, (iii) low morale among local veterinary staff and (iv) poor coordination and communication. The DVS had developed a budget of 66,015,880 Kenya shillings (KES) (790,609 United States dollars [USD]) as the national RVF emergency fund. However, no funds had been allocated to the budget. These issues were discussed at the stakeholder workshop held in Naivasha, Kenya in September 2012. Its recommendations were:• There is need for the RVF task force to establish a budget and an emergency fund to support the contingency plan/DST. The disease control agents, especially the District Veterinary Officers (DVOs), also need adequate financial support to run other basic disease surveillance and control activities. Some of these funds can be secured by establishing collaborative activities with relevant non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and international bodies such as FAO, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE). However, DVOs and other sub-national agents need to be facilitated by the national authorities (e.g. through provision of information and authority) to develop proposals for such engagements.• Field officers require more technical guidance and support in the implementation of the tool. It was suggested that this could be achieved by offering DST training in continuous professional development sessions, seminars, colleges, etc. The study also established that the tool has not been disseminated widely and in fact most DVOs and other stakeholders from NGOs were not aware about its existence.• Existing private-public partnerships should be strengthened and new ones initiated to ensure smooth implementation of the contingency plan/DST especially during emergencies. Experiences from previous outbreaks suggest that interventions implemented could have achieved greater impacts had implementation efforts been sufficiently coordinated. The disease control agents therefore need to strengthen linkages with trader associations, the police/security forces, border patrols, community representatives etc. especially during the inter-epidemic periods. Some of these interventions could be addressed through the refinement of the veterinary policy to highlight key partners and areas where collaborative efforts would be more beneficial.• Present a summary of the DST in posters and brochures to enhance its readership and dissemination. It was suggested that laminated cards or A4 posters be made for different audiences. They would contain the basic steps with quick instructions of what to do and who to contact at each step. A number of stakeholders e.g. farmer groups could help distribute these materials to create more awareness and hence compliance.• The workshop was informed that most respondents interviewed in the DST assessment studies regard the decision points defined in the DST as being numerous (12 in total) with some of them being too close in time to be considered as being independent decision points. The workshop recommended having five key decision points, namely: normal, early warning, pre-outbreak, outbreak and step-down phases with the DST stages being classified under them (five stages) while retaining the detailed information presented in the DST. A small group of experts was formulated to review the structure of the DST and refine the budget that had been proposed.This study was successful in identifying successes and constraints to the implementation of the DST. FAO had initially suggested hosting an interactive website in a decision tree structure that would enable users to quickly access the relevant information for a particular decision point of interest. Work is underway to develop DST dissemination materials and additional analyses are being done to determine benefits and costs of the RVF interventions captured in the DST. This would make a valuable component of an interactive website; the user could weigh different choices at each stage based on the benefits and costs involved and decide whether to act at that stage or wait until later. These activities are meant to generate additional information for effective decision-making.RVF outbreaks occur as explosive events that follow periods of prolonged heavy rainfall. They usually have a rapid onset and progression that has been difficult to predict in good time. The early warning message that preceded the 2006-07 RVF outbreak in East Africa, for example, was given in mid-September 2006 while a consolidated warning was given in November 2006 when initial cases of the disease had already occurred (FAO-WHO 2008). Such delays in prediction, coupled with poor surveillance systems, weaken the capacity of public and animal health departments to implement effective response measures. Surveys conducted in Kenya after the outbreak indicated that the severity of the epidemic was exacerbated by delays in recognizing the risk and in taking decisions to prevent and control the disease (ILRI 2009). The surveys also noted that that the country lacked a well-documented contingency/emergency plan for RVF and pre-allocated emergency funds, particularly within the livestock sector. These experiences made it necessary to refine the RVF contingency plans and develop the RVF DST to guide responses to future RVF epidemics (Consultative Group for RVF Decision Support 2010).The development of the RVF contingency plan was commenced by the DVS soon after the 2006-07 RVF outbreak in East Africa, through a consultative process, based on the template provided by FAO at http://www.fao.org/ docrep/005/y4140e/y4140e00.HTM . It was thereafter officially adopted in April 2010. At the same time, a consultative process was initiated that led to the development of the DST based on the findings of a study that had developed a timeline of events that led to the outbreak (Jost et al. 2010). That study was implemented in Northeastern Province, Kenya and Arusha, Tanzania. The timeline developed is summarized in Table 1. The DST identifies 12 decision stages and 13 interventions that could be implemented with the following assumptions:• A national RVF emergency fund has been established and procedures and modalities put in place to enable the fund to be made available rapidly in response to predetermined criteria.• An effective communication system has been established including a clear chain of command from the Director of Veterinary Services to the field which facilitates early and effective communication back up the chain from field to the Director and effective communication between the veterinary department and other relevant ministries and departments, such as health, planning and finance, and the provincial administration.• The above are captured in a government-approved RVF contingency plan. However, the DST has not been widely used as envisaged. Preliminary surveys conducted in Kenya in the initial two years following the dissemination of the DST indicated that only 10.2% (6/59) of the senior veterinary officers from the national, provincial and district veterinary centres had received the RVF DST and were conversant with its content (Gachohi et al. 2012). This study was designed to identify challenges associated with dissemination and application of the DST. Parameters developed to guide the research included:(i) Has there been an official recognition of the DST as a component of the RVF control policy in the DVS?(ii) What is the level of utilization of the framework (as per the proportion of key decision-makers that had the framework and the number of decision points that had been covered at any one time)?(iii) What are some of the perceptions on the ease of use of the DST?Review of literature A review of literature was carried out to identify systems and models that could be used with the DST as well as to describe successes and challenges associated with the implementation of the DST in general. The review used a 'funnelling in' approach which commenced with general searches that were subsequently refined until most of the information that was being pursued had been obtained.An initial systematic search of published articles was undertaken using the online databases PubMed and MEDLINE and selected search engines, including Google, to identify relevant studies and reviews on decision support systems worldwide, using key words/Medical Subject Headings. All permutations of Medical Subject Headings were entered and each search was conducted twice to ensure accuracy. Keywords used included decision support tool, framework, policy, stakeholders, barriers, attitudes, perceptions, processes, user experience, usability, uptake and dissemination. Summaries of returned articles were reviewed and articles where the abstract indicated potentially useful information were retrieved. Reference lists of identified articles and key reviews were also considered. Where suitable papers did not provide adequate information, authors were contacted by e-mail and requested to provide further information.Other sources of information used included 'grey' literature (including unpublished conference proceedings) and personal contacts with researchers known to have contributed to the development of a particular DST.• African Union-Interafrican Bureau for Animal Resources (AU-IBAR)• NGOs including Vétérinaires sans Frontières Belgium, Switzerland and Germany• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) KenyaInterviews were structured around a pre-developed checklist (Annex I) of issues of concern, even though not necessarily in the same order. Informants were allowed to follow the natural progression of the conversation in order to explore and capture emerging issues. Key issues covered included barriers and incentives, decision-making skills, technical and knowledge support, funding and RVF intervention options.Focus group discussions involved RVF control agents in the field (DVOs) and other stakeholders from various animal health sectors in Kenya. These discussions began in July 2012 after the development of a survey checklist. The same checklist (Annex I) was used to collect data on successes and challenges related to the implementation of the DST. Discussions were flexible and covered all key topics for all the focus groups convened although the order of the checklist questions was not always maintained since discussions were allowed to flow freely. Those interviewed included:• Veterinary officers in the three RVF hotspots: Northeastern, Rift Valley and Coast provinces A stakeholder workshop was held on 25 September 2012 in Naivasha, Kenya. A total of 19 participants drawn from various institutions attended. Discussions were guided by findings of the appraisal studies that had been done to collate experiences, attitudes and perceptions from decision-makers on the applicability of the DST.Findings from the review of literatureFindings from the review of literature are classified into two sections. The first focuses on early warning systems and risk models and how the DST can be integrated into these systems and the second outlines challenges that are associated with the utilization of such decision support systems in general.Early warning systems constitute a critical component of DST since they are useful for staging the DST. Messages generated from these systems define RVF risk levels, leading to the identification of an appropriate decision point to focus on. Risk maps, on the other hand, are useful for identifying risk zones where interventions suggested by the framework would be applied.• GLEWS (www.glews.net) is a system developed jointly by FAO, OIE and WHO. It systematically collects, verifies, analyses and responds to information from a variety of sources, including unofficial media reports and informal networks. The system minimizes unjustified duplication of efforts by linking and utilizing alert messages from different systems and organizations including FAO's Emergency Prevention System for Animal Health (EMPRES), WHO's Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network (GOARN) and OIE's World Animal Health and Information Database. These linkages also help to improve accuracy. The network is managed by a GLEWS task force which is responsible for setting up working groups and identifying diseases of interest. The GLEWS working groups are then involved in tracking trends of the identified diseases, conducting epidemiological analyses, modelling, forecasting as well as risk assessment. After each outbreak debriefing meeting, the GLEWS working groups submit a report including recommendations and conclusions to the GLEWS task force for review and clearance. The task force is responsible for issuing early warning disease alerts and general risk communication.• Africa Real Time Environmental Monitoring Information System (http://gcmd.nasa.gov/records/GCMD_CIESIN0122. html) -This system, developed jointly by FAO, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center, the University of Reading and the National Aerospace Laboratory of the Netherlands, uses remote sensing techniques for surveillance and forecasting under the Global Information and Early Warning System. It generates products such as 10-day and monthly cold cloud density maps for Africa and the Near East (resolution 7.6 km), 10-day and monthly estimated rainfall maps for the southern Sahara, the Sahel, Sudan, and the tropical countries of West Africa (resolution 7.6 km), 10-day and monthly composite vegetation index maps for Africa and the Near East. In addition to these products, the system maintains a 10-year vegetation index archive on a 10-day and monthly basis.• EMPRES-i (http://www.fao.org/foodchain/empres-prevention-and-early-warning/en/) is a web-based system designed by FAO to support disease control agents through collation, analysis of, and access to, animal disease data. EMPRES-i was particularly used to convey information on increasing RVF activity in the Horn of Africa in 2006-07. It enables users to easily access data that can be used for further analysis e.g. as charts or maps. EMPRES-i information sources include country or regional project reports, field mission reports, partner NGOs, cooperating institutions, government ministries of agriculture and health, FAO in-country representatives or other United Nations parties, public domains, the media and web-based health surveillance systems. For verification purposes, EMPRES-i uses official and unofficial sources of information such as in-country assistance projects and personal contacts with NGOs and other institutions. It therefore provides updated information on global animal disease distribution and current threats at the national, regional and global level for priority animal diseases. It also provides access to publications, manuals and other resources, such as contact details of chief veterinary officers and FAO/OIE reference laboratories. In addition to these systems, dynamic models such as the differential equation model developed by Gaff et al. (2007) can also aid in the staging of the DST since they predict changes in RVF risk over time. This model specifically highlights virus persistence for over 10 years provided that contact rates between hosts and the two mosquito species are maintained in an isolated system.Another study done in Kenya described the use of a regression model to compute relative risks of RVF based on geographic, geologic and meteorological data such as normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and land use patterns (Hightower et al. 2012).Other models have focussed on the risk of RVF with respect to movement of animals and their products through trade (Davies 2006). All of them used qualitative methods and none has specific focus on eastern Africa. One study in Egypt highlighted the possibility of spread of the RVF virus by insects carried by wind and animal movements though trade.Spatial analysis techniques were used to correlate RVF activity and increased NDVI (Linthicum et al. 1987). One study done in Kenya highlighted the possibility of forecasting RVF outbreaks two to five months in advance by associating the outbreaks with sea surface temperatures and NDVI data (Anyamba et al. 2009). Time series analysis of combined sea surface temperatures and NDVI anomalies were also found to be indicative of intensity and duration of RVF outbreaks in Africa (Anyamba et al. 2002).A subsequent study using the same methodology was used to provide a two-to-six-week warning for the Horn of Africa that facilitated outbreak response and mitigation activities (Anyamba et al. 2009). These studies used spatial techniques for mapping combined with time series analysis, remote sensing data and other statistical analysis methods (Figure 1a). Additional analyses have also been conducted to predict the distribution of the RVF hotspots based on the data on RVF epizootics obtained from Kenya (Bett et al. 2013). These models utilize climate, remote sensing, geological and limited socio-economic data; their output is demonstrated in Figure 1b.Their main limitation, however, is availability of data that can be used to drive these systems. In addition, climate models which determine the level of risk do not always give reliable predictions especially in western Africa, the Middle East and Madagascar (FAO-WHO 2008).Figure 1. Spatial distribution of RVF risk in the greater Horn of Africa estimated from remote sensing and climate data (Anyamba et al. 2009; Figure 1a) and based on the analysis of RVF epizootics (Bett et al. 2013; Figure 1b)Figure 1b Barriers that impair the use of decision support systems and research outputsMost publications on decision support systems do not provide information on the challenges that impair uptake and levels of utilization of these systems yet a few of them get assimilated into policy frameworks following their dissemination. A large proportion of these systems are interactive, computer-based tools (such as EpiMAN-FMD (Sanson et al. 1999), classical swine fever decision support system (Crauwels et al. 2001), geographical information systems etc.) with tremendous potential to enhance disease control. Though the DST has not yet been computerised, it is assumed that some of the limitations associated with the use of decision support systems would be relevant for this study. These limitations were classified into four main categories:• Technical challenges• Culture change/attitude challenges• Bureaucratic hoops and incentives• Resource limitations and ineffective dissemination modelsDecision support systems require appreciable levels of technical and infrastructural prerequisites for them to be used effectively, particularly on how to process input and output data. Stephens and Hess (1996) describe a study carriedFigure 1b out to assess the uptake of a PEARCH crop environment computer model that was developed to aid understanding on how crops respond to arid environments. The utilization of the model was impaired by multiple factors including challenges associated with organizing meteorological data for the model. In healthcare, electronic decision support systems are expected to aid decision-makers access knowledge stored electronically. This might help them make conscious choices regarding health and interventions. However, barriers to adoption of such tools have mainly been related to low computer literacy among general users.The DST shares some of these challenges with regards to the definition of credible decision triggers (based on forecasting models) given that these triggers have to be identified based on reliable prediction systems. Forecasting models, on the other hand, also have their own assumptions and limitations that can be applied to the DST.Changes in policy may be met with resistance especially when there is lack of understanding on the benefits of the changes or when implementers have alternative options. Wallace et al. (2013) give a comprehensive review of the barriers that impair uptake of scientific evidence by decision-makers: physicians, nurses and medical personnel. The review classifies obstacles encountered into knowledge, attitude and behaviour challenges. Knowledge indicates awareness of and familiarity with information and might be influenced by dissemination levels etc. Negative attitude and behaviour, on the other hand, come from lack of perceived usefulness of the product. The review observes that lack of access to information and limited awareness are significant barriers to uptake of evidence. Innvaer et al. (2002) identified similar barriers and suggested that some of these could be due to:• Absence of personal contacts between the researchers who generated the outputs and policymakers• Lack of timeliness or relevance of the research evidence• Mutual mistrust, including perceived political naivety of scientists and scientific naivety of policymakers• Power and budget struggles• Poor quality of researchThey propose that two-way communication between researchers and policymakers would facilitate a mutual understanding of a policy question and knowledge needed. Lomas (1997) further states that researchers and policymakers have to view research dissemination and uptake as a communication process between the two sides.It is believed that no matter how valuable a support tool is, institutional or high-level administrative support is required for it to make meaningful impact. An assessment of the effectiveness of the Intersectoral Action Plan for Health and its Health Impact Assessment Tool in Slovakia established that tools that had been institutionalized, for example Environmental Impact Assessment, worked well compared to those that had not (Mannheimer et al. 2007). Furthermore, the study established that politicians, though supportive of the action plan, had not allocated the required operational budgets. The public servants therefore felt that there was not enough support, resources and training for continuous and routine implementation of the plan. This suggests that decision-makers and politicians need to change their mind-sets in favour of new policies and support tools before they are introduced. New policies and tools, especially if they challenge the status quo or professional prowess, might have far-reaching consequences on tastes, preferences and sensibilities of those who are expected to implement them.DSTs also ought to enhance horizontal, intersectoral coordination to boost capacity and information exchange. However, such tools need to be institutionalized within and between sectors given that informal working principles do not always hold.Funding bodies do not often provide support for the translation of research outputs into policy (Poulos et al. 2007). Funding periods for these systems are usually too short to ensure effective dissemination (Myers et al. 2000). It is often assumed that the users have been integrated into the research work to enable them take over when funding comes to an end. It is slowly being realized that some of the partnerships formed in the course of a scientific research are not institutionalized and so there is usually no assurance that the research outputs will be carried over.Dissemination channels used need to identify distinctions across audiences being targeted, ways of enhancing the utilization of a tool and means of addressing negative perceptions on convenience of usage. Lomas (1997) indicates that researchers get 'one-size-fits-all' dissemination process and hence fail to tailor the content, timing, setting and format to the audience. A survey conducted by Wilson and Opolski (2009) on barriers for the implementation of a cardiovascular computerised decision support tool suggested ways of enhancing the uptake of the tool e.g. (i) using financial incentives, (ii) joint promotion with a professional body and (iii) undergraduate medical education. For the financial incentive model, users of the tool were provided with a one-off payment linked to a formal agreement for them to install and use the tool in their practice. Payment would be made to the user once evidence is received that the tool is being used and the target number of users has been met. The second dissemination method involved a joint promotion of the system as a valuable decision-making tool by a leading professional body which would allow the users to know that a peak body had endorsed the materials and information within the program. The last method on undergraduate training involved integration of the decision support system in undergraduate training providing students with knowledge and understanding of electronic tools that would be used.A total of 23 key informants, mostly senior veterinary officers and heads of departments at the DVS headquarters in Kabete (9) as well as local representatives from NGOs, KARI, CDC Kenya, AU-IBAR and Farm Africa ( 14), were interviewed to collate information on:• whether or not the DST had been used to manage RVF• extent of usage of the DST• perceptions on the convenience of usage of the DST• ability of the DST to guide and promote good responsesThree focus group discussions were conducted in Nakuru, Garissa and Mombasa to collate views and perceptions of DVOs and farmer representatives from the three RVF hotspots -Northeastern, Rift Valley and Coast provinces. Each group was composed of 7-9 people. The results of these discussions are presented with those of the key informant interviews.It was established that the DST had been incorporated into the RVF contingency plan developed by the DVS and it constitutes Chapter 8 of the RVF action plan. The decision points were classified under the action points defined in the FAO's guide for developing a contingency plan as outlined in Table 2.FAO had also used the DST to stockpile vaccines following warnings of heightened risk towards the end of 2012. These developments suggest that a number of institutions had started using the DST though no outbreak had ever occurred since it was developed for a conclusive determination on its suitability/ability to guide and promote good responses.Extent of usage of the DST Only 10.6% of all respondents (5/47) in both the key informant interviews and focus group discussions were aware of the existence of the RVF DST. Most of the respondents who were aware of it were senior officers at the DVS in Kabete. It was therefore established that usage of the DST was still limited to the national (veterinary) headquarters given that a majority of the districts/DVOs had not received it nor been sensitized on its application. The focus group discussions identified a number of constraints that had curtailed the widespread dissemination and application of the DST:• Resource and funding constraints The focus group discussions established that the DST had been incorporated into Kenya's RVF contingency plan and its operational budget (amounting to KES 66,015,880 or about USD 790,609) developed and assimilated into the department's strategic plans, including Vision 2030 and the medium-term expenditure framework. However, participants stated that the government had not provided the funds and the DVS was exploring ways of supporting the budget, including developing proposals targeting bilateral funds. The department had been hoping to secure and ringfence these funds especially during inter-epidemic periods as it builds the response capacity. It was also indicated that it is better to raise funds during inter-epidemic periods given that the bureaucratic and slow procedures involved in raising and mobilizing funds would frustrate emergency responses to be used during the high-risk periods.The department intends to lobby for the required funds but it needs more input on costs and benefits of RVF control to incorporate these in its proposals. It also suggests that social-economic surveys should identify and prioritize issues at the local level that can be used to leverage funding.Issues raised under this theme focussed on technical challenges that hamper the implementation of the RVF response measures identified in the DST. Participants underscored the need for better and cheaper diagnostic tests that can be used in remote areas to enhance surveillance during inter-epidemic and epidemic periods. It was pointed out that field workers collected samples and sent them to the Central Veterinary Laboratories in Nairobi for confirmatory analyses with initial testing being done at the regional veterinary laboratories. It was indicated that the turnaround time for samples processed at the Central Veterinary Laboratories was too long and so the stock owners had lost patience with the system. Officers who managed sentinel herds indicated that they were not being allocated enough resources for periodic sampling of the animals. Funds assigned to them were not adequate for purchasing consumables and fuel or vehicle repairs and replacing animals that had seroconverted.Participants suggested that community animal health workers could help in disease reporting in pastoral areas where they offered clinical services. Various models of linking these community animal health workers with veterinarians (as described in reports on the delivery of animal health services) were identified, e.g. linking them with local private veterinarians who operate agro-veterinary stores.Discussions were held on the need for safer and more effective vaccines while recognizing that existing vaccines caused side effects e.g. abortion. The rate of production and dissemination of these vaccines was also thought to be inadequate. These factors, together with poor acceptability, contributed to low vaccination coverage. Other factors that were attributed to low vaccination coverage included poor security in most RVF hotspots, poor road network and low operational budget. These factors compromised the ability of the department to administer effective vaccination drives. Some of the NGOs had therefore stepped in to support the department although some of their campaigns focussed on defined target areas given their interests to integrate interventions at the community level.The focus group discussions suggested that the DVS needed to play a more critical role in coordinating disease control interventions implemented by the NGOs to ensure that plausible targets (e.g. spatial and population coverage, frequency and safety) were achieved.Participants indicated that the DVS did not have the capacity to implement vector control measures. This activity was being implemented by the Ministry of Health although its focus was to control mosquitoes in settlement areas and not in watering and animal grazing sites. The DVS was requested to strengthen its capacity to manage RVF especially during the inter-epidemic period when it was possible to cover wide areas.DVOs generally felt that RVF was not being taken seriously given that the DVS focussed more on diseases that are perceived as causing the greatest economic burden. They thought that their directors had not prioritized RVF given that it was a zoonotic disease that could be addressed by multiple institutions such as the Zoonotic Disease Unit. They offered suggestions on how to enhance their participation in RVF management policy, namely:• training on the disease epidemiology, syndromic surveillance, budgeting and cost-benefit analyses, and the use of DST.• more interaction between researchers and implementers to better understand exposure patterns as well as harmonise response procedures.• provision of an effective infrastructure/funding for the DST implementation.• employing more staff as well as retaining the existing ones given that there is a high turnover of staff and it would be difficult to maintain the institutional memory required for effective management of RVF given its long interepidemic period.The DVOs indicated that the DST and RVF contingency plan had not been disseminated effectively as most of them and their NGO partners had not received it. They observed that there is a need for the DVS to develop modalities of enhancing the utilization of the DST, for example, by assigning specific individuals, offices or other institutions the role of disseminating the DST. They added that the government needs to enforce animal health policies, particularly in the arid and semi-arid areas where the disease is endemic, for the disease control and coordination efforts to be felt on the ground. Some of these efforts could be implemented through the Zoonotic Disease Unit.Participants also noted that there was need to synchronize policy issues throughout East Africa to allow for the use of the DST as a common RVF management and control tool given that it is a trans-boundary disease. These attempts were already being explored under the AU-IBAR project entitled Standards Methods and Procedures in Animal Health. Some of the steps that would be taken to achieve this include:• Disease prioritization surveys to harmonize efforts across borders since RVF may or may not be a priority disease in all the target countries.• Standardization of disease surveillance and control acts.• Characterization of RVF control programs in the target countries and the development of a region-wide acceptable standards.• Identification of a coordinating body (such as the Intergovernmental Authority on Development, FAO or AU-IBAR) to manage these activities.• Establishment of a database of stakeholders in the field of RVF research through which pertinent information such as research results can be passed along from one institute to another. This will promote information flow between institutions as well as enhance communication and collaboration;• Strengthening of the existing public-private partnerships to ensure smooth implementation of the DST especially during emergencies. These include linkages with trader associations, the police/security forces, border patrols and community representatives.There is need for an official platform to facilitate communication and collaboration between government institutions and NGOs as the current ones are based on personal relationships/acquaintances. This hampers collaborations especially during emergencies. Memoranda of Understanding would promote, nurture and guide institutional partnerships that will far outlive individual relationships. District Steering Groups should be set up even in non-arid and non-semi-arid areas to assist in coordination of disease control activities during emergencies. This would ensure sharing of resources as well as tone down excessive institutional competition.Perceptions on the convenience of usage of the DST Participants who had used the DST indicated that the number of decision points identified was high and the document was voluminous and so there was need to develop shorter versions of the document (e.g. briefs and leaflets) to improve its distribution and accessibility. Suggestions were also made on the need to improve prediction models.Nineteen participants drawn from various institutions attended the workshop convened on 25 September 2012 in Naivasha, Kenya to verify the findings of the focus group discussions including the challenges associated with the utilization of the DST, and identify effective ways of disseminating the tool.Below is a summary of the key points discussed at the workshop.• The level of utilization of the DST has been very low. Under 10% of decision-makers had received the tool, partly because the channel that was used for its dissemination (e-mail) is inaccessible for most of the field officers.In addition, the DST was said to be rather long (32 pages). The workshop recommended the development of simpler versions of the document like posters or brochures that would be easier to read and disseminate. These documents could then be distributed during stakeholder meetings and to all the DVS offices throughout the country.• The DST has been incorporated into the RVF contingency plan that was developed by the DVS in liaison with FAO. The DST forms Chapter 8 of the contingency plan. It was however noted that the DVS should involve other stakeholders in the development of the contingency plan. This would also help transform the contingency plan/DST into a One Health framework when the needs and inputs of the other relevant stakeholders, e.g. Ministry of Health, are incorporated.The workshop came up with a list of stakeholders that could be involved. These were classified into three main groups: advisory or coordination team, response or implementation team and financiers. The contingency plan will need to be revised, spelling out the roles of each stakeholder group.• The workshop was informed that most respondents interviewed in the DST assessment studies regarded the stages defined in the DST as being numerous (12 in total) with some of them being too close in time to be considered as being independent decision points. The workshop recommended having five key decision points, namely, normal, early warning, pre-outbreak, outbreak and step-down phases, with the DST stages being classified under them (five stages) while retaining the detailed information presented in the DST.• The workshop observed that RVF response measures, mainly vaccination, movement control and surveillance, are often implemented late, haphazardly and at very low levels of coverage. For example, during the RVF outbreak in 2006-07, vaccination was implemented from February 2007 when the epidemic was tailing off. The coverage attained then was estimated to be 3-18% in cattle, 3-56% in sheep, 1-25% in goats and 2-4% in camels. The DVS indicated that it often faced major challenges in funding RVF control. The DVS was however challenged to explore other channels of mobilizing resources, including developing proposals for external funding.Since the last RVF outbreak in the Horn of Africa 2006-07, efforts have been made to develop decision support tools and frameworks to improve response capacity. The need for decision support tools is informed by the fact that RVF epizootics occur in irregular cycles that offer immense challenges for governments to develop clear intervention strategies in the face of an outbreak after a period of no visible RVF activity. Inter-epidemic periods are characterized by a decline in the levels of awareness; limited resources are therefore shifted to other diseases or more pressing problems (Martin et al. 2008). In addition, future decision-making in RVF control is complicated by uncertainties regarding types of drivers that are critical for the disease occurrence. Though it is suspected that there is a threshold level of precipitation that would heighten the risk of an epidemic, it is likely that a convergence of a number of events (e.g. strong reduction in population immunity, presence/emergence of infectious vectors, persistent precipitation, presence of a critical population of hosts etc.) are required for an outbreak to occur. It is not always possible to predict the convergence of these factors. Therefore, uncertainties about the disease causation impose severe limitations on the choice of interventions.The DST was developed to help decision-makers in the Greater Horn of Africa take timely, evidence-based decisions to prevent and mitigate the impacts of RVF (Consultative Group for RVF Decision Support 2010). Its development and dissemination was, however, based on four key assumptions suggesting the existence of emergency fund that can be made available based on predetermined criteria, communication system with a clear chain of command, and that during normal situation the users will review the suggested interventions in line with the contingency plan.Observations generated by this study, however, indicate that these assumptions have proved to be the DST's Achilles heel.The key strengths of the study is that it addressed barriers to the utilization of the DST through sequential steps that started with a review of 43 articles, followed by key informant interviews and focus group discussions with stakeholders from diverse backgrounds and lastly, a stakeholder workshop that validated the findings obtained. From these activities, four parameters were identified and used to gauge the level of utilization of DST: (i) whether or not the DST had been used to manage RVF, (ii) the extent of usage, (iii) perception on the convenience of usage, and (iv) its ability to guide and promote good responses.There were a few challenges associated with the implementation of the study. First, very scanty information regarding uptake and level of utilization of decision support tools was obtained despite a good number (n = 43) of articles reviewed. Most of the articles focused on decision support systems that were mainly being used in the medical field in developed countries. Moreover, most of the systems reviewed had not been applied in official policy settings, suggesting that there could be publication bias acting against systems that get disapproved by policymakers. This might also suggest that the development of decision support systems is seldom linked to desired needs leading to its inability to gain traction in the policy arena. To guard against narrowing the review to a few potentially non-representative articles, those focussing on challenges of uptake and utilization of research outputs in general were included. Second, the fourth assessment parameter envisages a scenario where the DST has been fully utilized through its 12 decision points. Fortunately, the Horn of Africa has not had an RVF outbreak since the DST was developed. Reports relating to the successful application of the DST represent preparatory activities that were implemented in response to heightened risk of RVF in 2008 and 2012 that never developed into an outbreak.The results of this study agree with those of one carried out in 2010 to investigate the sources of early warning messages and response measures implemented by the DVS during the 2006-07 RVF outbreak in Kenya (Gachohi et al. 2012). In that study, 10.2% of the survey respondents were aware and had received a copy of the RVF DST. This shows that there have not been any efforts to disseminate and increase awareness and utilization of this tool.In addition, barriers and challenges hindering the uptake of the DST that were identified during the focus group discussions and key informant interviews corroborate those identified from the literature review. To some extent, this is expected because the checklist used to guide the focus group discussions was developed based on the evidence obtained from the review. Nevertheless, the focus group discussions and key informant interviews were conducted in an open manner to encourage and foster the identification of new information leads. The focus discussion groups, for instance, indicated frontline personnel in the DVS (in the districts) lacked the drive to implement RVF control policy for what they perceived to be lack of support and prioritization of the disease at the headquarters. This culture goes against the spirit of the DST which in fact recommends a raft of measures that should be implemented during normal (inter-epidemic) periods e.g. establishment of information systems, risk analyses, training of personnel, pre-testing of messages, among others. These measures, if implemented, would reduce impulsive responses when risk warnings are provided. More work is therefore needed to promote the culture of risk-based decision-making as espoused in the DST.Resource limitations and underfunding of RVF interventions were identified as critical and long-standing challenges that the department should find innovative ways of addressing e.g. by developing proposals for funding. It was also realized that though the government has not allocated any funds to the RVF emergency fund, it has invested a substantial amount of funds to establish disease-free zones at the Coast Province and in Laikipia, Isiolo and North Rift. This intervention has been supported by proponents of integrated management of trans-boundary animal diseases since it provides a platform for the development of contingency plans for a range of trade-sensitive diseases. The department should, however, not lose sight of the need to develop capacity for managing emergency responses such as the ones needed when RVF outbreaks occur. In the past, it has been criticized for not managing disease outbreaks and balancing investments in disease control against successive surges in case counts. The department in fact has a huge potential to play a coordination role when it does not have adequate funding to implement the interventions.Annex 1: Checklist for discussion points for key informant interviews and focus group discussionsSeveral factors may prevent a tool from making any significant impact in helping to improve the decision-making process. These can perhaps be grouped into• Language/ comprehension/ simplicity• General layout 2. Constrains to its widespread uptake and use ","tokenCount":"7323"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0272940604.json b/data/part_2/0272940604.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3b90052637eaf158dcdd3741e6e53ad41b87e0ae --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0272940604.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"971b7484c7d9351ca35975c518aabdd0","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/57601e9f-6ba5-4865-b19b-04ad3b6fddb9/content","id":"1377092550"},"keywords":["AMOVA, analysis of molecular variance","BSSS, Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic","CIMMYT, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center","CML, CIMMYT maize line","GRIN, Germplasm Resources Information Network","MPH, midparent heterosis","MRD, modified Roger's distance","NSSS, non-Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic","PAV, present-absent variation","PCA, principal component analysis","PVP, Plant Variety Protection","SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism"],"sieverID":"21e5ac2f-e5ea-4683-ad2c-ebb9eb257c48","pagecount":"16","content":"The use of temperate maize (Zea mays L.) inbreds with expired Plant Variety Protection in tropical maize breeding programs could enhance the combining ability for grain yield among tropical heterotic groups. We used DNA markers from the DArTseq genotyping-by-sequencing platform to investigate the genetic structure of lines with expired U.S. Plant Variety Protection (ex-PVP) relative to the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center's (CIMMYT's) maize heterotic groups. Neighbor-joining cluster analysis revealed two major groups: CIMMYT and ex-PVP.The CIMMYT lines clustered according to their pedigree relationships and adaptation, but not according to their heterotic groups. In contrast, ex-PVP lines clustered according to the Stiff Stalk Synthetic (BSSS) and non-Stiff Stalk Synthetic (NSSS) heterotic groups, except for a few lines that were considered to be mixed. The genetic divergence, estimated as Wright's fixation index (F ST ), between BSSS and NSSS (F ST = .053, P < .01) was four times as large as the divergence between CIMMYT Tuxpeño and non-Tuxpeño heterotic groups (F ST = .013, P = .068). Estimates of genetic divergence marginally favored breeding with BSSS in Tuxpeño and NSSS in non-Tuxpeño. However, CIMMYT breeders may still exploit the ex-PVP heterotic structure fully only by ensuring that the temperate heterotic groups are placed on opposite sides of the Tuxpeño and non-Tuxpeño heterotic pattern. We also showed how estimates of admixture from model-based clustering could be used to avoid ex-PVP lines of mixed heterotic background when selecting lines to maximize the genetic divergence and combining ability of CIMMYT heterotic groups.The International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) hybrid maize (Zea mays L.) breeding programs for the lowlands (0-900 m asl), mid-altitudes (900-2,000 m asl), and highlands (>2,000 m asl) were started in the early 1990s using populations of mixed racial origin as source germplasm (Vasal, et al., 1999;Vasal & McLean, 1994). Therefore, an initial objective of CIMMYT's hybrid maizebreeding program was to identify heterotic patterns among the populations and inbred lines using cross-classified mating designs (Vasal, et al., 1992;Vasal, et al., 1993). Vasal et al. (1999) (CIMMYT, 1998;Vasal et al., 1999). Heterotic groups and patterns are important because they determine how germplasm is organized, managed, and used to achieve genetic gain from selection in hybrid breeding programs (Melchinger & Gumber, 1998). Quantitative genetics theory for heterosis shows that in the absence of epistasis, and assuming two alleles per locus, midparent heterosis (MPH) between two random-mating populations is a function of dominance and the square of the difference in allele frequencies at loci controlling the trait of interest (Falconer and Mackay, 1996;Lamkey & Edwards, 1999;Melchinger & Gumber, 1998;William & Pollak, 1985). Heterosis is therefore maximized when the difference in allele frequencies at loci associated with the trait of interest in the parents is maximized (Melchinger, 1999).Genetic structure analysis of CIMMYT germplasm using simple sequence repeat (SSR) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers did not detect genetic divergence according to heterotic groups among inbred lines (Semagn et al., 2012;Wu et al., 2016;Xia et al., 2004Xia et al., , 2005)). The results observed among CIMMYT lines were similar to the results of Duvick, Smith, and Cooper (2004) that showed apparent clustering by heterotic groups for modern Pioneer Hi-Bred lines and lack of structure for lines from the U.S. preheterotic group era. Although heterotic patterns discovered based on phylogenetic and geographical isolation exist (e.g., B73 × Mo17, or the case of Iodent and the French inbred line F2 in Europe), empirical evidence suggests that heterotic groups are created and enhanced by breeders through selection (Barrière et al., 2006;Duvick et al., 2004;Hallauer, 1999;Tracy & Chandler, 2006). Studies of the heterotic structure of germplasm are done to guide germplasm organization and management for breeding purposes. To be informative, therefore, the studies of the heterotic structure of CIMMYT lines should be done with lines that have been widely used in breeding or as parents of successful hybrids, as opposed to the full set of CIMMYT maize lines (CMLs) as was done in previous studies (Wu et al., 2016;Xia et al., 2004;Xia et al., 2005).Breeding with several heterotic groups can be expensive and inefficient as hybrid development often requires the use• Genetic diversity was higher among CIMMYT than among US ex-PVP inbreds. • The heterotic structure of US ex-PVP was more developed than that of CIMMYT inbreds. • Ex-PVP lines can be used to increase the genetic diversity between CIMMYT heterotic groups. • Increasing the genetic divergence between CIM-MYT heterotic groups could increase heterosis.of cross-classified mating designs to identify new hybrids and superior inbred lines (Pswarayi & Vivek, 2008). The use of a singular overarching heterotic pattern is desirable because it simplifies inbred and hybrid development and saves resources through the use of one to a limited number of testers to identify new superior inbred lines and hybrids. The CIMMYT maize inbred lines were classified based on the predominant racial origin of the source population and combining ability with established heterotic testers as either Tuxpeño (Group A; e.g., Population 21) or non-Tuxpeño (Group B; e.g., Population 32), but the groups are still indistinguishable (Wu et al., 2016). Reciprocal recurrent pedigree selection (Lee & Tollenaar, 2007) with existing lines can be effective in driving allele frequencies in opposite directions in the long term; however, introgression of exotic germplasm with a diverged heterotic structure could be a complementary strategy to enhance CIMMYT's heterotic groups.The Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic (BSSS) and non-Stiff Stalk Synthetic (NSSS) heterotic pattern has been in use in the U.S. Corn Belt since the late 1940s (Hallauer, 1999;Tracy & Chandler, 2006;Troyer, 2004) and is probably the most developed in maize breeding globally. In the United States, proprietary maize inbred lines are protected by either the U.S. Plant Variety Protection Act, a U.S. utility patent, or both. As the protections expire after 20 yr, these inbred lines become available to the public. The heterotic relationship and structure of inbred lines with expired Plant Variety Protection certificates and U.S. patents (ex-PVP) have been extensively studied (Lorenz & Hoegemeyer, 2013;Mikel & Dudley, 2006;Nelson et al., 2008;White, Mikel, de Leon, & Kaeppler, 2020). Consistent with the theoretical expectations for a reciprocal pedigree recurrent selection program (Comstock, Robinson, & Harvey, 1949;Lee & Tollenaar, 2007), all the studies have shown clearly that allele frequencies between the BSSS and NSSS heterotic groups have significantly diverged and that this divergence has resulted in increased combining ability and grain yield of BSSS × NSSS hybrids in the U.S. Corn Belt (Duvick, 2005a(Duvick, , 2005b;;Duvick & Cassman, 1999). The heterotic divergence in the BSSS and NSSS heteroticpattern could be exploited to increase genetic divergence and, as a result, combining ability between the Tuxpeño and non-Tuxpeño heterotic groups. In addition to enhancing the heterotic structure, ex-PVP lines can also be used to improve other important traits such as reduced inbreeding depression and time to maturity, increased yield potential and stalk and root strength, adaptation to higher planting densities, and fast grain dry down.Understanding the genetic composition of ex-PVP lines and their relationship with CIMMYT germplasm is necessary to effectively exploit the heterotic structure of the BSSS and NSSS heterotic pattern to improve the combining ability of the Tuxpeño and non-Tuxpeño heterotic pattern. We assessed the genetic structure of ex-PVP lines relative to the CMLs and other elite and special trait inbred lines using SNPs and present-absent polymorphisms (PAVs) from the DArTseqbased genotyping (Edet, Gorafi, Nasuda, & Tsujimoto, 2018;Ren et al., 2015;Sansaloni et al., 2011). We narrowed our objective to focus only on the genetic structure of CIMMYT elite lines widely used for breeding and hybrid development and the most recombined ex-PVP lines (Mikel, 2011;Mikel & Dudley, 2006). Specifically, we (a) assessed the degree of genetic divergence between BSSS and NSSS relative to CIM-MYT Tuxpeño and non-Tuxpeño, (b) determined the ideal heterotic alignment of BSSS and NSSS with CIMMYT Tuxpeño and non-Tuxpeño lines (i.e., determine in which CIM-MYT heterotic group to introgress the BSSS or the NSSS lines), and (c) identified the most genetically pure sources of BSSS or NSSS ex-PVP lines to use in CIMMYT breeding programs.Seed of 244 U.S. ex-PVP lines genotyped in this study was obtained through the Germplasm Resource Information Network (GRIN) (http://www.ars-grin.gov/npgs; accessed 11 July 2020) from the U.S. North Central Regional Plant Introduction Station (Ames, IA) in 2014. Information from the PVP certificates obtained from the GRIN data system and from published studies (Mikel, 2011;Mikel & Dudley, 2006;Nelson et al., 2008;White et al., 2020) was used to classify lines as either BSSS or NSSS. In addition, a total of 570 tropical, mid-altitude, and highland CMLs and other elite inbred lines from CIMMYT's breeding programs were also genotyped. The 244 temperate lines represented about 80% of the lines in the ex-PVP database in 2014; the 570 CIMMYT lines represented most of the diversity in CIMMYT germplasm.Because not all CMLs were widely used in CIMMYT and other private and public breeding programs, we performed genetic diversity and structure analyses on a subset of 147 lines (Table 1) representing the core set of lines used in CIM-MYT breeding programs in 2014, and the most recombined ex-PVP lines (Mikel, 2011;Mikel & Dudley, 2006). The CIM-MYT subset had 76 lines that consisted of 43 Tuxpeños and 33 non-Tuxpeños. The ex-PVP subset had 71 lines: 45 NSSS and 26 BSSS. Although the majority of the selected ex-PVP lines were among the most recombined (Mikel, 2011;Mikel & Dudley, 2006), others were selected based on recommendations from some U.S. breeders that were familiar with the germplasm and our field observations.Sequencing and SNP calling , 1984). The DNA was then quantified and diluted to an equal concentration of 200 ng μl −1 before performing high-throughput genotyping in 96 plex using DArTseq technology following methods described in earlier studies (Chen et al., 2016;Ren et al., 2015;Sansaloni et al., 2011). The genomic DNA of all the samples was digested with restriction enzymes PstI (CTGCAG) and HpaII (CCGG) prior to ligating barcoded adaptors to identify each sample. For each 96-well plate, 16% of the samples were replicated to assess the data reproducibility. Amplification products of equal molar concentration for each sample were pooled by plate and amplified with c-Bot (Illumina) bridge PCR, followed by fragment sequencing using Illumina Hiseq 2500 (http://www.illumina.com; accessed 11 July 2020). Sequence analysis was done to align reads with the sequence tag-based maize meta-genome, and SNPs and present-absent variations (PAVs) were called using the DArTsoft analytical pipeline. A search was conducted on the B73 reference genome (B73 RefGen_v3; Andorf et al., 2016) to look for the positions of the SNPs. The SNP position search was conducted using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST; Altschul, et al., 1990;Ye, et al., 2006) with a maximum 4-bp mismatch threshold. The marker locations and tiled regions were mapped to the B73 reference genome from the Gramene database (ftp://ftp.ensemblgenomes.org; accessed 11 July 2020), but some SNPs and PAVs could not be mapped to a chromosome. A total of 616,967 unimputed SNPs and 18,936 present-absent variations (PAVs) were successfully identified on each inbred line. After removing markers with >25% missing data and minor allele frequency <5%, T A B L E 1 The subset of 147 lines consisting of the most widely used for breeding and hybrid development in the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) breeding programs and some of the most recombined lines with expired Plant Variety Protection (Mikel & Dudley, 2006) a Chromosome 0 consists of markers that could not be mapped to the B73 reference genome.the 8,690 unimputed SNPs and 12,391 PAVs (21,081 markers) that remained had an average of 7.35% missing data (Table 2). The 21,081 markers or subsets with ≤5% missing data, depending on the type of analysis, were used for subsequent genetic diversity analyses.Summary statistics for markers, including heterozygosity, percentage missing data, and the effective number of alleles per locus, were computed across the 21,081 markers using R Crop Science (R Core Team, 2019). The effective number of alleles (A e ) for each marker was calculated aswhere D j is the gene diversity of the jth of l loci.Standard χ 2 tests were used to test for genetic homogeneity between pairs of heterotic groups (Table 1), with a null hypothesis of equal allele frequencies between groups. The χ 2 tests were done using a subset of 10,413 markers with ≤5% missing data and minor allele frequency ≥.01. A Bonferronicorrected probability value of .05/n, where n is the number of loci, was used to adjust for multiple testing. The number of significant markers for each pair of populations was then expressed as a proportion of the total number of markers analyzed. The standard errors for the percentages of significant markers were calculated using standard formulae, according to the Bernoulli distribution (Evans, et al., 2000). Data of the subset of 10,413 markers coded as codominant genotypes were also subjected to analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) (Excoffier, et al., 1992). The AMOVA was conducted using GenAlEX (Peakall & Smouse, 2012) to estimate Wright's fixation index, F ST (Wright, 1965). Statistical significance for pairwise F ST values was determined by permutation across the dataset.Private alleles (the number of alleles unique to a subpopulation) were estimated in R from 5,000 random samples of 26 (the smallest subset) lines drawn without replacement from the Tuxpeño, non-Tuxpeño, and the NSSS subsets using the full set of 21,081 markers. Private alleles between the full CIMMYT and ex-PVP sets was estimated from the average of 1,000 random samples of 244 drawn without replacement from the CIMMYT group. A resampling approach was used to estimate the number of private alleles to avoid bias due to differences in sample size.Principal component analysis (PCA) was also done using the 21,081 markers on the CIMMYT, ex-PVP, and the subset of 147 inbred lines with the prcomp package in R. The first three principal components were plotted using the scat-terplot3d package in R. The genetic distance between each pair of inbred lines was estimated across the 21,081 markers using Rodger's modified genetic distance (MRD). The MRD was calculated aswhere p ij and q ij are the alleles frequencies of the jth allele at ith locus in each pair of inbred lines, a i is the number of alleles at the ith locus, and m is the number of loci. The MRD matrix was used to perform cluster analysis using the neighbor-joining method with the hclust package in R. The MRD was preferred because its square (MRD 2 ) is linearly correlated with MPH (Melchinger, 1999). The dendrogram was produced using the software Figtree 1.4.0 (http://tree.bio. ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/; accessed 11 July 2020). To assess whether PAV and SNP markers gave similar results on the genetic relationships among the lines, we created two MRD distance matrices for the full set of 814 lines: one based on the 8,690 SNPs and another based on the 12,391 PAVs. The two distance matrices were then converted to vectors that were then used to calculate Pearson's linear correlation coefficient between the SNP and PAV genetic distances.The population structure of the subset of 147 lines was evaluated using model-based clustering using the program STRUCTURE 2.3.4 (Pritchard, et al., 2000;Hubisz, et al., 2009). STRUCTURE was run with a subset of 7,994 markers that had <5% missing data and minor allele frequency ≥.1. The program was run with the number of populations, K, ranging from 1 to 10, with five runs for each value of K, a burnin period of 30,000, and 30,000 replications. The model with the optimal population number was selected using the ad hoc statistic delta K (ΔK), which is based on the rate of change in the log probability of the model between successive K values (Evanno, et al., 2005).The MRD matrices for PAV and SNP markers were highly correlated (r = .78, P < .01), indicating that combining the two marker datasets for the statistical analyses conducted in this study was appropriate. The AMOVA detected a significant genetic divergence (F ST = .16, P < .01) among the four groups. Pairwise F ST estimates were significant for all comparisons, except for between Tuxpeño and non-Tuxpeño (Table 3). The F ST between BSSS and NSSS was about four times as large as the F ST between Tuxpeño and non-Tuxpeño. Estimates of F ST between CIMMYT and ex-PVP heterotic groups showed that BSSS was more diverged from Tuxpeño and non-Tuxpeño (F ST ≈ .09, P < .01) than NSSS was diverged from the CIMMYT heterotic groups (F ST ≈ .08, P < .01) (Table 3).Similarly, BSSS and the CIMMYT heterotic groups had an average of 16% more loci with heterogenous allele frequencies than between the CIMMYT germplasm and NSS (Figure 1). Further, only 0.30% of the loci had heterogenous allele frequencies between Tuxpeño and non-Tuxpeño, compared with 24.4% between the BSSS and NSS (Figure 1). The percentage of loci with heterogeneous allele frequencies between the Tuxpeño and BSSS (42.5%) was larger than that between Tuxpeño and NSSS (27.1%). The difference in mean percentage of heterogeneous loci between the Tuxpeño and BSSS pair and between the non-Tuxpeño-BSSS pair (1.35% or 141 loci) was statistically significant (t > 200, P < .001), suggesting that BSSS was genetically closer to Tuxpeño than to non-Tuxpeño. Also, the difference in percentage heterogenous loci between the Tuxpeño and NSS, and the non-Tuxpeño and NSS pairs (0.95%), although too small to be of practical significance, suggested that NSSS was genetically closer to non-Tuxpeño than to Tuxpeño (Figure 1). Although the largest number of significant markers (68%) was observed between the full sets of 570 CIMMYT lines and 244 ex-PVP lines (Figure 1), the largest heterotic group divergence based on allele frequencies was observed between non-Tuxpeño and BSSS (Figure 1).The average MRD among individual lines was highest within the full CIMMYT set and the subsets of Tuxpeño and non-Tuxpeño lines, suggesting that the CIMMYT germplasm pool had more genetic diversity than the ex-PVP set. Average MRD among the 244 ex-PVP lines was similar to the CIM-MYT subsets, but the NSSS subset had a higher average MRD than the BSSS subset (Table 4). The CIMMYT group and its subsets also had higher genetic diversity when diversity was expressed as either the average number of effective alleles per locus or the average number of private alleles (Table 4). In addition, the trend in all three measures of genetic diversity suggested that the BSSS subset had lower genetic diversity than the NSSS subset (Table 4). Based on the number of private alleles in each heterotic group, the Tuxpeño group, with an average of 39.7 private alleles, was the most dissimilar of the four heterotic groups (Table 4). Trends in the group pairwise average genetic distances were in agreement with F ST estimates showing no genetic divergence between Tuxpeño and non-Tuxpeño (Table 3). In contrast, the distance (MRD) between BSSS and NSSS was more than twice as large as the distance between Tuxpeño and non-Tuxpeño. (Table 3). In addition, estimates of MRD suggest that both Tuxpeño and non-Tuxpeño heterotic groups had equal genetic distances to NSSS and BSSS. Collectively, these results suggest a lack of genetic divergence between the CIMMYT heterotic groups and the presence of genetic divergence between the CIMMYT germplasm pool and the ex-PVP lines and between the BSSS and NSSS heterotic groups.Cluster analysis of the subset of 147 inbred lines revealed two main clusters: the CIMMYT and the ex-PVP clusters (Figure 2). The 76 CIMMYT inbred lines clustered according to their source populations and the breeding program from which they were developed, but not according to their heterotic groups. Four weak subclusters were inferred in the CIMMYT cluster: inbred lines from the highland breeding program, mid-altitude, and lowland, and a mixed cluster of lowland and mid-altitude lines (Figure 2). The highland cluster consisted of all the 11 lines (Table 1), with no overlap with germplasm from the lowland tropical and mid-altitude programs (Figure 2). The lowland tropical cluster consisted of seven lines that can be traced back to the Tuxpeño Population 21: CML264, CML401, CML498, CML503, CML500, CLWN216, and CML573. The rest of the lines in the lowland tropical cluster were not related to Population 21 by pedigree; however, CML450, CML451, and CML495 have a common parent that may be related to Population 21.The mid-altitude cluster consisted of lines from the midaltitude programs in Mexico, Kenya, and Zimbabwe, whereas the mixed cluster consisted of lines from the lowland and midaltitude programs. The inbred line CML444 clustered with CML494, CML576, and CML373 (Figure 2), all extracted from Population 43. The inbred line CML312 clustered with related lines from Zimbabwe (CML539 and CML537) and its sister line CML311, as would be expected based on pedigree information (Figure 2). Additional subgroups of lines related by pedigree included the Suwan subgroup of CML224, CML225, CML227, and CML510. The lines CML489 and CML440 also clustered with Suwan lines despite having no evidence of Suwan germplasm in their pedigree. The close clustering of CML330, CML331, and CML332 is also consistent with pedigree information, indicating that all three were extracted from a population that was 50% Suwan. Theclustering of lines of the same heterotic group was also observed for CML78, CML375, CML505, and CML491, which all belonged to Tuxpeño.The clustering of lines based on their source population and association of sister lines such CML311 and CML312, CML383 and CML384, and CML379 and CML380 showed that our data were able to detect real genetic relationships among the lines. However, some inconsistencies were observed: CML537 (CML312 × CML206) clustered with CML202 instead of CML206. Further, CML483 clustered with CML78 instead of the related lines from Population 502: CML321, CML383, and CML384.The BSSS and the NSSS heterotic groups were clearly separated in the ex-PVP cluster (Figure 2). Within the BSSS cluster, a subcluster of lines from Pioneer Hi-Bred and another consisting of lines of Holden Foundation Seeds and Dekalb lines were detected (Figure 2). The NSSS cluster consisted of three distinct subclusters of Iodent, Oh07-Midland, and Oh43 or M017. The Iodent (PH207 and others) cluster consisted primarily of lines from Pioneer Hi-Bred and lines that were derived out of Pioneer hybrids. The Oh7-Midland (PHR03 and others) cluster consisted entirely of Pioneer lines, suggesting that this germplasm was unique to Pioneer Hi-Bred. The Oh43/Mo17 or Lancaster cluster was made up mainly of Holdens and Dekalb lines, with PHT60, PHG47, and PHK76 from Pioneer Hi-Bred also clustering with the Lancaster lines (Figure 2).Principal component analysis for the 570 CIMMYT lines separated inbred lines from the highland breeding program from the lowland tropical and tropical mid-altitude inbred lines on PCA1 (Figure 3). No clear separation of groups was observed on the other two principal components. The first three principal components explained 5.7% of the genetic variation, consistent with the general lack of structure in CIMMYT germplasm (Figure 3). In contrast, PCA for the 244 ex-PVP lines separated the lines into at least five subgroups (Figure 4). The first principal component (PC1) for all the ex-PVP lines separated the BSSS from the NSSS lines; BSSS lines were on the positive end and NSSS lines on the negative end of the PC1 axis (Figure 4). Lines that had a mixed NSS and BSS background, such as PHJ40, PHRE1, and PHAA0, were near the origin of the PCA1 axis. Iodents were on one end, and Mo17 and Oh43 lines were on the other end of the PCA2 axis, with BSSS, Oh7-Midland, and other NSS lines (e.g., Minnesota 13 and the French lines F2 and F7) at the origin. Along PCA3, the most extreme groups were mixed: one cluster consisting of Mo17 and B73 lines on one end, and B14, B37, and some Iodent lines on the other end. In general, PCA3 separated B73 and Mo17 types from B14 and B37 types. The first three prin- cipal components for the ex-PVP lines explained 23.8% of the genetic variation among the lines (Figure 4). For the subset of 147 lines, the first three principal components explained 19.8% of the genetic variation. The first principal component (PCA1) separated CIMMYT lines from ex-PVP lines. On one extreme of PCA1 were the lowland tropical lines from Population 21, and on the other extreme were the B73-derived BSSS lines. The highland, Oh43, and the Oh7-Midland lines were close to the origin of PCA1 (Figure 5). The second principal component separated the BSSS from the NSSS lines, with Iodent lines on one extreme of PCA2 and B73 lines on the other; CIMMYT lines were close to the origin of the PCA2 axis (Figure 5). Finally, the third principal component had Iodent lines on one extreme and Mo17 and Oh43 lines on the other of PCA3. The CIMMYT lines were at the origin of PCA3, and highland lines CHWE237, CHYL22, and CML460 were close to the Oh7-Midlands lines and the Mo17 or Oh43 lines (Figure 5).Model-based clustering results for the subset of 147 ex-PVP and CIMMYT lines are shown in Figure 6 because the results were more informative than the results for K = 2 for the use of ex-PVP lines in CIMMYT breeding programs. Despite the lack of subpopulations within CIMMYT germplasm, the results showed a trend towards an increase in the proportion (Q) of temperate (ex-PVP) genome with altitude (adaptation) from lowland to highland (Figure 7). The proportion of temperate genome for lowland tropical lines ranged from Q = 0 (for inbred lines from Population 21) to Q = .16 (for CML534), with an average of .07. The midaltitude lines had an average Q = .16 from the ex-PVP lines, with a range of Q = .03 (for CML379 and CML380) to Q = .36 (for CML486). The proportion of the genome originating from temperate lines was highest among highland lines with an average Q = .32 and a range of .29 (CML459) to .40 (CHWE237) (Figure 7). The results also suggest a higher proportion of NSSS alleles in CIMMYT lines than BSSS alleles (Figure 7). Most ex-PVP lines were assigned to the BSSS or the NSSS heterotic group, except PHMK0 and LH85, that were considered mixed because they had membership probability (Q) < .5 in all three populations (Figure 7). Among the BSSS lines, the majority of the Dekalb and Holden lines and the Cargill line 2369 had Q ≥ .9 within the BSSS group (Table 5). In contrast, the only BSSS lines from Pioneer Hi-Bred that had Q ≥ .9 within the BSSS population were PHHB9 and PHW52 (Table 5). For the NSSS group, 19 lines had Q ≥ .9 within the 5). The lines with high membership probability (Table 3) in their assigned group were considered the purest for that group.It is clear from the results of our study using all CIMMYT lines and the subset of lines that were widely used for breeding and as parents of successful hybrids that CIMMYT maize lines do not cluster according to their heterotic groups. These results were consistent with the finding of previous studies that used the full set of lines (Wu et al., 2016). The lack of genetic divergence between CIMMYT makes it challenging to choose testers to evaluate the combining ability of new inbred lines. However, the clusters of families of lines that were derived out of the same populations, such as Suwan 1, Population 21, Population 43, Population 500 (CML311 and CML312), and Population 502, could form the base germplasm that can be used to refine and enhance CIMMYT heterotic groups via both a pedigree-based recurrent selection scheme for combining ability and targeted introgression of ex-PVP germplasm. The Suwan germplasm (Sriwatanapongse, Jinahyon, & Vasal, 1993), for example, is a major heterotic group in subtropical and tropical breeding programs (Fan et al., 2015;Wu et al., 2019), but it is relatively underused in CIMMYT's breeding programs. Inbred lines of Suwan background could also be targeted for breeding in the non-Tuxpeño group because they did not cluster with lines from Population 21-the primary source of Tuxpeño in the CIMMYT germplasm pool.The CIMMYT inbred lines also clustered by adaptation; the highland lines formed a unique group, whereas the tropical and mid-altitude groups were mixed. This genetic structure of CIMMYT germplasm can be exploited to enhance heterotic groups by moving germplasm across adaptation zones, at leastT A B L E 5 Summary of the inferred populations from genetic structure analysis of the subset of 147 International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) and expired Plant Variety Protection (ex-PVP) linesLines bCIMMYT: Q ≥ .9 CLWN216, CML264, CML394, CML401, CML450, CML451, CML495, CML498, CML500, CML503, CML573, CML379, CML380, CML384, CML311, CML576, CML312, CML494, CML383, CML532, CML537, CML444, CML449, CML531, CML436, CML286, CML488, CML530, CML269, CML330, CML321, CML332, CML373 CIMMYT: .5 ≥ Q < .9 CML539, CML491, CML331, CML438, CML225, CML224, CML439, CML440, CML375, CML227, CML534, CML483, CML510, CML487, CML206, CML202, CML489, CML395, CML197, CML78, CML390, CML442, CML505, CML536, CML538, CML323, CML463, CML464, CML460, CML445, CML324, CML457, CML459, CHYL22, CML461, CML462, CML327, CHWE227, CHYL10, CHWE133, CHYE140, CML486, CHWE237 BSSS: Q ≥ .9 LH194, CARG2369, LH132, LH196, LH198, LH200, LH202, LH205, LH195, PHHB9, PHW52, DKFBLL, DK2FADB, DK2FACC BSSS: .5 ≥ Q < .9 LH208, DK87916W, PHP38, PHG39, PHT11, PHK29, PHBW8, H8431 NSSS: Q ≥ .9 DKIBC2, PHG29, PHJ90, LH214, PH207, PHN82, PHP02, LH213, PHTD5, CARG11430, DK3IIH6, LH284, LH123HT, PHP55, DKIBO14, LH181, LH211, LH212Ht, PHR25 NSSS: .5 ≥ Q < .9 PHR03, PHK56, LH216, PHV78, PHR63, PHG35, PHM10, DK3IBZ2, DKMM501D, LH59, DK78551S, DKIBB14, PHG47, LH172, PHK76, PHN46, LH210, DKMM402A, LH184, PHK46, PHG84, PHT60, PHZ51, PHJ40, PHAA0, PHRE1, PHM57, PHJ31 Mixed PHMK0, LH85a The populations inferred from structure analysis using the software Structure 2.3.4 (Pritchard et al., 2000): CIMMYT, Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic (BSSS), non-Stiff Stalk Synthetic (NSSS) subdivided based on admixture values (Q) of each of the lines. The mixed group consisted of lines that did not have group membership >.5 in any of the three inferred populations. b Inbred lines with expired U.S. Plant Variety Protection (ex-PVP) were from Pioneer Hi-Bred (prefix PH), Dekalb Genetics (prefix DK), Holden Foundation (prefix LH),and Cargill (prefix CARG). The BSSS line H8431was from Novartis Seeds.on one side of the Tuxpeño-non-Tuxpeño heterotic pattern, given the limited variation among heterotic groups. Pedigree records of CMLs show that there has been little movement of germplasm between the highland program and tropical or mid-altitude breeding programs. Similarly, Population 21 has been a rich source of lines in Latin America, but it has not been used for breeding in Africa. In the same vein, unique germplasm from Africa (e.g., the N3 and SC heterotic pattern from Zimbabwe; Derera & Musimwa, 2015) has not been used for breeding in the lowland tropical and highland programs in Mexico.Because the genetic diversity among the CIMMYT heterotic groups was low, it is especially crucial that germplasm exchange and use be complemented by a breeding strategy that is designed to increase genetic divergence and combining ability between the heterotic groups (Duvick et al., 2004;Lee & Tollenaar, 2007). DNA markers can be used, not just to aid selection but also to help assign lines to heterotic groups and avoid making breeding crosses between lines that are supposed to belong in different heterotic groups. The absence of DNA marker-based quality control for breeding crosses could contribute to unintended mixtures and hinder progress in the divergence of heterotic groups. The mixture of heterotic groups resulting from breeding with the wrong crosses could explain the inconsistency observed in the pedigree of CML537. The inconsistency in the pedigree of CML537 was also detected in an independent study by Wu et al. (2016), suggesting that it was a case of the wrong cross being made rather than resulting from sampling errors during genotyping. On the other hand, the inconsistency detected for CML483 suggests a sample handling error because CML483 clustered with related lines from Population 502 in the study by Wu et al. (2016).A trend towards a higher proportion of temperate alleles in mid-altitude and highland than in lowland tropical germplasm was consistent with the genetic constitution of the source populations from which the lines were extracted. The inbred CML486, which had the highest ex-PVP population membership probability among the mid-altitude lines, was extracted from Population 45, whose background included lines from Purdue University, BSSS, hybrids from Dekalb Genetics, and inbred lines from Nebraska (CIMMYT, 1998). Further, several highland populations contained up to 25% of U.S. Corn Belt germplasm (CIMMYT, 1998). In contrast, only a few of the tropical populations contained U.S. Corn Belt germplasm (e.g., Populations 19 and 26) (CIMMYT, 1998), and most of them did not result in widely used CMLs probably because the selection pressure against temperate alleles was higher in lowland tropical environments than in mid-altitude and highland environments.Evidently, CIMMYT germplasm is still in the preheterotic group era relative to the BSSS and NSSS heterotic pattern Crop Science (Duvick et al., 2004;Tracy & Chandler, 2006). However, despite the limited genetic divergence between the CIMMYT heterotic groups, there were enough clustering patterns that could be used to optimize the heterotic grouping through reclassification of some of the lines, moving germplasm across breeding programs, and use of a breeding approach that aims to increase allele frequency divergence and combining ability. Introgression of BSSS lines in one heterotic group and NSSS in the other could be a complementary strategy to increase the combining ability between the CIMMYT heterotic groups.Our results confirmed the genetic divergence between the BSSS and NSSS heterotic groups among ex-PVP lines (Nelson et al., 2008;Lorenz & Hoegemeyer, 2013;Beckett, Morales, Koehler, & Rocheford, 2017;White et al., 2020).In addition, the subgroups identified in the BSSS heterotic group were consistent with historical pedigree information indicating that the BSSS heterotic group of Pioneer Hi-Bred consisted of B14, B37, Maiz Amargo, and Iodent, whereas that of Dekalb Genetics and Holden Foundation Seeds consisted predominantly of B73 (Mikel, 2011Mikel & Dudley, 2006;Troyer, 2004). The NSSS subgroups of Lancaster, Oh7-Midland, and Iodent were also in agreement with pedigree information indicating that Mo17 was prominent in Holden Foundation Seeds and that it was rare in Pioneer Hi-Bred International (Tracy & Chandler, 2006). Cluster analysis, PCA, and model-based clustering placed the majority of the lines in the BSSS or NSSS heterotic groups and subgroups as expected according to pedigree information (Beckett et al., 2017;Mikel, 2011;Mikel & Dudley, 2006;Nelson et al., 2008;White et al., 2020). However, there were a few exceptions: PHJ40, PHAA0, and PHRE1 were declared BSSS by Mikel and Dudley (2006), but our results from model-based clustering assigned them to NSSS. It is important to note that the results depend on the set of lines analyzed and that the clustering pattern may be different for a different set of lines. Still, we suspect that the clustering of PHJ40, PHAA0, and PHRE1 closer to NSSS than BSSS could have been caused by the Maiz Amargo genetic background, which was not accounted for in the model-based clustering in this study, and their Iodent background (Mikel & Dudley, 2006).The lines PHMK0 and LH85 were declared mixed because they did not have membership probability >.5 in any of the three populations inferred using model-based clustering. PHMK0 can be traced back to B14, B37, Maiz Amargo, and Iodent; the Iodent component could explain the NSSS membership, whereas the Maíz Amargo component could have been lumped into the CIMMYT group. The other mixed inbred line LH85 was selfed out of Pioneer hybrid 3978 with unknown background information (Mikel & Dudley, 2006). The results of model-based clustering suggest that Pioneer 3978 was a BSSS × NSSS hybrid, and LH85 was, therefore, of mixed genetic background. By contrast, DK3IIH6, DKIBO14, and DKIBC2, which were also selfed out of Pioneer hybrids, clustered with Iodent lines, whereas LH123 from Holden Foundation clustered with Oh43 lines; all four lines had NSSS membership probability ≥.9, suggesting that they were all derived out of NSSS × NSSS hybrids.The lines with the highest membership probability in either BSSS or NSSS should have the most substantial allele frequency divergence between the two groups. Breeding with the purest BSSS lines in one of the CIMMYT heterotic groups and NSSS in the other would maximize allele frequency divergence and, possibly, combining ability for grain yield between the Tuxpeño and non-Tuxpeño heterotic groups. In addition, the results showed that our data could be used to resolve unclear pedigree information, and, as a result, the heterotic grouping of the ex-PVP lines used in this study.The results showed a lack of genetic divergence between the CIMMYT heterotic groups and large genetic divergence between BSSS and NSSS. The genetic divergence between the BSSS and NSSS heterotic groups could be exploited to enhance the genetic divergence and combining ability of the CIMMYT Tuxpeños and non-Tuxpeños. Evidence from tests of genetic divergence using F ST and χ 2 tests for homogeneity allele frequencies between heterotic groups, although weak, suggested that BSSS should be placed in the Tuxpeño group and that NSS should be used in the non-Tuxpeño group. It is important to note that other factors such as seed yield and pollen production may determine in which CIMMYT heterotic group the BSSS and NSSS lines are placed. When only male and female seed production traits were considered, it was deemed appropriate to align BSSS with Tuxpeño and non-BSSS with non-Tuxpeño (Whitehead, Caton, Hallauer, Vasal, & Cordova, 2006). The decision to group BSSS with Tuxpeño and NSSS with non-Tuxpeño is therefore consistent with the results of this study and is supported by empirical data (Cupertino-Rodrigues, Dhliwayo, Trachsel, Guo, & San Vicente, 2020).According to quantitative genetic theory for heterosis and empirical evidence, increased genetic divergence at loci associated with the trait of interest should result in increased combining ability. The findings of this study could be used in conjunction with pedigree information to select the most heterotically pure BSSS or NSSS lines to use in CIMMYTbreeding programs to maximize the divergence of heterotic groups. The BSSS inbred lines such as LH132, LH198, and LH195 that had the least membership probability in NSSS (e.g., Q ≥ .9; Table 5) should have a higher priority for CIMMYT breeding than lines with higher membership probability in NSSS heterotic group. Likewise, NSSS lines with the lowest membership probability in BSSS, such as PHG29, PHN82, and LH213 (Table 5), should also be included in the list of lines to use for CIMMYT breeding, together with other highly recombined lines such as PHR03 and PHK56 (Mikel, 2011;Mikel & Dudley, 2006).Introgression of BSSS into Tuxpeño and NSSS into non-Tuxpeño can increase the performance of CIMMYT hybrids only if the genetic divergence observed between the NSSS and BSSS heterotic groups is associated with grain yield in tropical environments. Genetic divergence is a prerequisite for heterosis to occur. The results of previous studies indicated that heterosis increased with an increase in genetic divergence but within a restricted range of genetic divergence (Moll, Lonnquist, Fortuno, & Johnson, 1965;Moll, Salhuana, & Robinson, 1962;Paterniani & Lonnquist, 1963). Further, studies that assessed the relationship of DNA marker-based genetic distance with MPH and F 1 hybrid yield reported moderate to high correlation coefficients, but these studies were conducted within adapted germplasm pools (Melchinger, 1999;Reif et al., 2003). The presumption that the genetic divergence between BSSS and NSSS is associated with hybrid performance in temperate environments is supported by empirical evidence. The genetic divergence between NSSS and BSSS resulted from a pedigree breeding strategy akin to reciprocal recurrent selection that resulted in increased combining ability and grain yield of BSSS × NSSS hybrids (Duvick, 1984(Duvick, , 2005b;;Duvick et al., 2004;Hallauer, 1999;Lee & Tollenaar, 2007).The genetic divergence between BSSS and NSSS is thus associated with increased grain yield in temperate environments; the question, therefore, is whether the ex-PVP lines are not so extremely diverged from tropical lines that the favorable alleles in temperate lines are masked by a lack of adaptation to tropical environments. Cupertino-Rodrigues et al. ( 2020) evaluated BSSS × non-Tuxpeño and NSSS × Tuxpeño hybrids in the mid-altitude tropical environments in Mexico and reported that several hybrids had grain yield equal or superior to that of the adapted check hybrids. The NSS inbred lines PHR03 and PHN82 combined well for grain yield with Tuxpeño testers, and the BSSS lines PHG39 and PHK29 combined well with non-Tuxpeño testers. It is therefore likely that the favorable alleles for grain yield in temperate environments are expressed in tropical environments. However, Cupertino-Rodrigues et al. ( 2020) evaluated only 10 BSSS and 11 NSS lines in mid-altitude (>900 m asl) environments where disease pressure is lower than in lowland tropical environments (<900 m asl). Hence, more studies involving more lines across more tropical environments may be needed to assess fully the usefulness of ex-PVP lines for tropical maize breeding. Nevertheless, the results of this study should help breeders increase the genetic divergence between Tuxpeños and non-Tuxpeños by avoiding ex-PVP lines of mixed heterotic origin and by maintaining BSSS and NSSS lines in separate heterotic groups when forming breeding populations with ex-PVP lines.Disease resistance and general adaptation to tropical environments have to be addressed before the yield potential of temperate germplasm is fully expressed. Further, for markets that prefer white grain, selection for grain and cob color is necessary because most of the ex-PVP lines have yellow grain and red cob. These considerations influence the breeding approach and the size of segregating populations when breeding with temperate germplasm in tropical environments. Two general approaches can be proposed: a conservative approach that aims to introduce small (≤25%) proportions of temperate germplasm through backcrossing, or an aggressive approach using populations that have 50% or more temperate germplasm. The aggressive approach in both heterotic groups would result in a higher frequency of temperate alleles and greater genetic divergence between the BSSSderived Tuxpeños and NSS-derived non-Tuxpeños. Based on evidence from Cupertino-Rodrigues et al. ( 2020), the aggressive approach might be successful in the mid-altitude tropics and perhaps in the highlands. In contrast, the conservative approach or the recycling of temperate-derived mid-altitude inbreds seems appropriate for the lowland tropics when disease pressure is high.The probability of success when selecting in populations with a high proportion of temperate germplasm might be improved by intermating each population for one or two generations before extracting lines using the traditional pedigree selection (Goodman, 2004). Intermating would reduce linkage drag and improve the recovery of favorable temperate alleles; however, the benefits of intermating may be offset by an increase in the breeding cycle time, especially if no more than two generations can be completed per year. The CIMMYT mid-altitude maize breeding programs in sub-Saharan Africa and Mexico have begun breeding with ex-PVP lines that have shown superior combining ability (e.g., PHR03, PHN82, PHK29, and PHG39) and other highly recycled related lines using a combination of both the conservative and aggressive approaches. Future studies could investigate the genetic divergence and combining ability between the resulting BSSS-derived Tuxpeño and the NSS-derived non-Tuxpeño lines to assess the effectiveness of the breeding strategy and the usefulness of ex-PVP lines.Finally, the introgression of ex-PVP lines to increase the divergence of CIMMYT's heterotic groups can only succeed if it is accompanied by a sound breeding strategy, sustained investment, and germplasm management standards that areadhered to by all breeders. Efforts to create the current BSSS and NSSS heterotic groups started in the 1940s, about 50 yr before Plant Variety Protection certificates of the current ex-PVP lines were issued in the mid-1980s to mid-1990s (Duvick et al., 2004;Hallauer, 1999;Tracy & Chandler, 2006). It should take the same time or at least the same effort for CIM-MYT to develop heterotic groups that are as diverged as the BSSS and NSSS heterotic pattern. However, modern breeding tools, the availability of ex-PVP lines, and the retrospective lessons learned in temperate maize breeding programs may help reduce the time and effort it should take to develop divergent heterotic groups in CIMMYT breeding programs. Divergence of allele frequencies and increase in combining ability between heterotic groups could be expedited by uncoupling hybrid development from population improvement, then apply reciprocal recurrent genomic selection (Gaynor et al., 2017;Rembe, Zhao, Jiang, & Reif, 2018) to improve combining ability and to drive divergence in allele frequencies between heterotic populations.","tokenCount":"7290"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0283992236.json b/data/part_2/0283992236.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3160033fef952034c44ee8c17ede092ac682df42 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0283992236.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b62a587718351b36328caedd24271ab1","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/c3abaf8d-162e-4500-97ba-61fe2cdc370e/retrieve","id":"147624046"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"391188f1-703b-403d-a973-d7f3eb53876d","pagecount":"6","content":"All participants in the study have witnessed a change in weather in the last 10 years. Most notably, temperatures have increased and become more variable while precipitation has decreased and become more variable. Perceptions of climate change in Vietnam do not appear to be individual but rather disaggregated at the household level (at the most finite level) or possibly at the landscape level. Perceived impacts of stress by male and female respondents are quite similar, which may indicate that stress is managed at the household level rather than at the individual level. Further gender research in Vietnam should focus on adaptation and coping strategies during climate change stress as it appears that gender differences are most present in this area. To cope with climate change issues, farmers need:(1) rice varieties that are tolerant to stresses such as heat, drought, and salinity; (2) pest management training; and (3) crop production management training. Challenges related to climate change faced by individual households are likely to be the same challenges as their neighbors. Thus, future climate change studies in Vietnam should also include spatial analysis.This brief summarizes the findings of a project output for the Policy Information and Response Platform on Climate Change and Rice in ASEAN and its Member Countries (PIRCCA), being implemented by the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). The report focuses on the results of the survey conducted in the first half of 2015 on climate change perception and adaptation strategies of male and female farmers in three selected provinces across the Mekong River Delta (MRD) region in Vietnam: An Giang, Bac Lieu, and Tra Vihn.The survey gathered information on current climate change perceptions and adaptation strategies and gaps between the identified male and female respondents.A total of 214 farm households were selected to be part of the climate change perception and adaptation strategies study. The husband and wife of each household were separately interviewed, which brings the number of respondents to 428 (214 pairs). The surveys were carried out by IRRI's local partner in Vietnam, the Institute of Policy and Strategy for Agriculture and Rural Development (IPSARD), in seven districts located in the three provinces.Geographic selections for this study were based on a priori knowledge of areas facing climate change issues. This criterion was used in the selection of provinces, districts, communes, and villages. Once the villages were identified, a list of farmers with at least 10 years of farming experience was prepared for each commune.Survey participants were then selected using a stratified random sampling procedure with equal numbers of respondents from each village.Of the 214 surveyed households, all male and female farmers reported that they had noticed changes in the weather in the last 10 years. This result is in support of Lambrou and Nelson (2013) who received the same response from Indian farmers reporting change over a 40year period. When asked specifically about changes in temperature, nearly all respondents, male (92.1%) and female (85.0%) alike, reported a perceived increase in temperature.The data suggest that perceptions of the average temperatures are higher and there is potentially more variability in temperatures. Results also showed that respondents perceived colder temperatures during the cold months (18.2% for males and 19.2% for females) and hotter temperatures during the hot months (37.4% for males and 50.9% for females) as well as many irregular changes in temperature.On the average, male and female respondents reported a decrease in precipitation. Approximately 31% of the males also perceived rainfall coming later in the season. Reports indicated that the most significant change in perception observed was low rainfall. Similarly, males and females had compatible perceptions on drought. High drought was most perceived, with approximately half of the respondents noting that they had experienced high drought.Nearly 40% of the male respondents also reported early drought. Ninety-one males and 66 females reported high drought to be the most significant change in the last 10 years. The responses to changes in precipitation and drought are in agreement with one another and suggest that low precipitation is of concern to many respondents in southern Vietnam. In further agreement, the respondents also reported less flooding in the last 10 years.Sea-level rise does not seem to be a major concern to the respondents: 42% of the male respondents and 37% of the female respondents reported no change in sea-level rise in the last ten years. The responses on sea-level rise were similar between males and females. In fact, all responses regarding climate variability were similar between male and female respondents.There is slight variation in responses between male and female respondents in regards to what causes climate change. Male respondents reported that climate variability is due to humankind and non-humankind activities at 33% and 44%, respectively, while female respondents reported 41% and 43%, respectively. Female respondents were 8% more likely to report humankind activities as drivers of climate change. Regardless of this difference, there appears to be a consensus among the respondents that temperatures are increasing and becoming more variable, precipitation is decreasing, and sea-level rise is not presently a concern in their respective regions.Both male (66.4%) and female (67.3%) respondents reported heat stress to be the climate stress most present in their area. Similarly, drought was reported as the second highest observed stress in each respondent's area, followed by salinity and flooding. When respondents were asked which stress was most important or most prominent in their areas, the most common response was salinity. Even though heat and drought were identified as the major stresses present in the area of the respondents, stress associated with salinity was reported to have the greatest effect on their areas. This observation was reported by 35.0% of male and 40.6% of female respondents. Storms and sea-level rise were rarely reported as observed weather stresses.Male and female respondents during the project orientation.Figure 1. Perceived changes in precipitation and drought during the last 10 years in the survey areas.Respondents also reported that livestock production was affected by stress. The major effect reported was in the increase in disease incidence. The most commonly reported livestock raised were cows and pigs among 55 and 34 households, respectively. The effect of climate stress in aquaculture is unknown in this study because only few respondents engage in aquaculture.A total of 123 (57.48%) male and 105 (49.06%) female respondents reported that climate stress has affected irrigation on their farms.Based on an open-ended question, the most reported effects on irrigation were shortage of water and salinity contamination. The most commonly reported irrigation source was canals (85.70%). Among all the respondents, only five identified new sources of irrigation in the farm after stress. The new sources mentioned include public wells, dikes and gates.Survey interview with a male farmer-respondent.Respondents were asked to identify the impacts of climate stress on rice production. Low yields were the most commonly stated impact for both males and females, with 66.35% of male and 68.22% of female respondents reporting it. Other reported impacts include crop loss and incurrence of debt. Respondents were also asked if there were noticeable changes in individual stresses on male and female household members as a result of climate stress. The responses were nearly identical for all four scenarios:(1) male perception of male stress; (2) male perception of female stress;(3) female perception of male stress; and (4) female perception of female stress. Generally, male respondents perceived more health problems for both male and female household members. Female respondents, meanwhile, perceived increased anxiety of male and female household members. The similarities of responses among males and females may indicate that stress is managed at the household level rather than at the individual level.Another objective of the study is to investigate the existing institutional support extended to the respondents during stress. The types of support included in the inquiry were housing support, relief goods ration, credit support, health insurance, training on new rice technologies, and support on farming activities. The findings reveal that majority of the institutional support that was investigated in this study was not widely used by the respondents. For instance, the only institutional support that had a large recognition from male and female respondents was on farming activities (57.9% for male and 42.5% for female).On their expectation of institutional support during stress, the most common responses include improved rice varieties, training on production techniques and climate change adaptation, access to low-interest credit for inputs, better access to markets, and price support for paddy produced in the farm to be sold at a higher price.Respondents also reported non-farm support such as access to rice for home consumption and health insurance.Figure 3 . Perceived impact of stress on household members.Respondents were asked about their access to information on cropping patterns and agronomic practices. Most of them stated that they have access to these information, and information on weather conditions are most common.Respondents were asked what they did as individuals to cope with the negative impacts of climate stress. For many, \"do nothing\" was the most mentioned strategy in dealing with stress (56.1% for male and 38.3% for female). Aside from \"do nothing\", male respondents also cited other strategies such as reducing household consumption of food (26.6%), availing of bank loans (21.5%), and working more (21.5%).Meanwhile, female respondents reported reducing household consumption for food (30.4%), availing of banks loans (27.6%), use of savings (22.0%) and working more (21.0%) as adaptation strategies. The results of the inquiry on adaptation and coping strategies introduce major differences in male and female perception. An example of such disparity is the use of bank loans between male and female respondents (21.5% vs 27.6%).It is also possible that the coping strategies within the household are not equally known to all members.A greater consensus was observed between genders regarding the changes in farming activities that male and female intend to do in case of a climate stress. For male respondents, \"no change\" (45.8%) is still the most common strategy reported. Female responses reported \"no change\" (39.3%), second only to changing rice variety (46.7%). Male respondents reported changing rice variety second most frequently (44.4%). Change of cropping pattern was also cited by male (19.6%) and female (15.4%) respondents, and many respondents also reported leaving lands to fallow. Other adaptation strategies such as changing to livestock production, diversifying crops planted, growing dry fodder crops, and relocating crops were rarely mentioned. As discussed, \"change rice varieties\" was reported to be the most common option of change in farming activities that is done in times of stress. When asked on factors that influence the decision to change their commonly used rice varieties, both male and female respondents had almost similar responses. Data for this study were gender disaggregated to investigate whether there was gender disparity in climate change perceptions or adaptation and coping strategies. The data do not provide any strong evidence that a gender gap exists in climate change perception. The largest variability in responses comes from the individual coping and adaptation strategies.Some interesting findings from this study are: The respondents have witnessed change in weather in the last 10 years. Most notably, temperatures have increased and become more variable while precipitation has decreased. The expressed needs of farmer-respondents are rice varieties that are heat-tolerant, drought-tolerant, and salt-tolerant; pest management training; and crop production management training.The findings of the study affirm that there is no gender imbalance in terms of awareness and understanding of climate change issues between male and female rice farmers in the MRD. However, this study finds differences in the coping and adaptation strategies between male and female. The empirical evidence of this study supports the anecdotal evidence witnessed through several field visits conducted for the study. The following are the probable reasons for these findings: The term 'climate change' is not so popular among farmers in the study areas. Climate change became more comprehensible when it was represented by proxy questions relating to changes in temperature, precipitation, etc. Farmers recognize changes in climate through actual experience in agricultural activities. In addition, the wide coverage of climate issues in the mass media such as television, radio, and newspapers in the MRD and other rural areas, has helped in disseminating climate and weather information. The findings of the study that there are no gender differences in climate change perceptions are consistent with other gender-focused climate change studies (see Lambrou and Nelson, 2013). Climate change impacts indiscriminately across landscapes but not all individuals within these landscapes are equally equipped to adapt to climate change. Similarly, challenges related to climate change faced by individual households are likely to be the same challenges as their neighbors but each household and individuals in each household are likely to have different adaptation abilities and strategies.Therefore, future studies on climate change perceptions in Vietnam should provide more emphasis on landscapelevel impacts of climate change and less emphasis on gender issues that do not appear to exist in climate change perceptions.Future gender research in Vietnam should focus on adaptation and coping strategies during climate change stress as it appears that gender differences are present in this area. Finally, the effect of household income on climate change perceptions and adaptations should be investigated in future research.","tokenCount":"2178"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0297806109.json b/data/part_2/0297806109.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f11f20f9c64f8f128f7d442c39cf9d737ba96895 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0297806109.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"2667bf514a68d7ad949bdf175950d835","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/ec664cd7-e40b-445b-bb08-f4cd36e3c600/retrieve","id":"2078086568"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"5e327906-e9a1-464b-a2eb-14541e9b30dc","pagecount":"31","content":"Background 2 03 The Dialogues 3 04 African Dialogues 4 05 Regional dialogue summary according to cross-cutting themes 6 Southern region (Botswana,Climate change is adversely affecting regional and national food systems contributing to low agricultural productivity and food insecurity;Countries are adopting diverse approaches to move towards environmentally sustainable production and consumption, but they require capacity building and financial resources for implementation;To improve trade and market access there is a need for improved infrastructure, the harmonisation of trade standards and better monitoring and dissemination of market information;Value chain development is constrained by a lack of access to processing equipment, technical knowledge, financial resources and disconnected value chain actors;High levels of food waste are attributed to poor handling, a lack of food processing and inadequate storage facilities (especially cold chains), poor road and rail infrastructure and limited access to markets;Health challenges include poor nutritional education and awareness, a lack of dietary diversity, inadequate food safety standards and policy, unaffordable nutritious whole foods and low levels of consumption of local/indigenous food products;Gender and social inclusion is recognised as essential to sustainable food systems but requires land tenure reform and improved access to inputs, including finances, by women, youth and vulnerable groups;Discussions on governance and policy highlight the naeed for the maintenance/development of supporting infrastructure, improved alignment of policy, revised land use policy and better coordination and collaboration between and amongst government departments/ ministries and other stakeholders;There is a need to enhance investment in demand-driven food systems research, and this can be achieved through private and public sector partnerships;Technology and innovation are key for knowledge sharing, enhancing agricultural productivity and the generation of agricultural data for evidence-based decision making; andCredit and loan facilities are largely inaccessible to food producers due to high interest rates.The United Nations Secretary-General called upon world leaders to take part in the Food Systems Summit to accelerate collective action for food systems transformation. This report synthesises the findings from the African Member States' Dialogues, held to shape national pathways towards sustainable food systems.In 2021, the United Nations (UN) Secretary-General convened a Food Systems Summit (the Summit) as part of the Decade of Action to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030. The Summit presented new actions to progress towards the seventeen SDGs, each of which relies to some extent on more sustainable and equitable food systems.The ongoing Food Systems Summit Dialogues (the Dialogues) provide a standardised approach for purposeful events that enable a diverse range of stakeholders to collaborate and share their experiences with the goal of transforming food systems to sustainably meet the current and future needs of the global population.The Dialogues follow a standardised approach involving the following:• Inclusion of diverse actors from across the entirety of food systems;• Adherence to the Summit's principles of engagement;• Discussions on the long-term visions for sustainable food systems;• Sharing of reflections, building on knowledge, experience and wisdom;• Reflection on the consensus and divergence of opinions amongst the stakeholders; and• Identification of priorities for action within the context of current realities.Multi-stakeholder dialogue allows multiple actors to congregate and apply their combined knowledge and experiences to address a problem. The discussions are stimulated and guided by facilitators so that the desired outcomes are shaped and articulated. The outcome is a thorough exploration of the issue at hand, the development of shared positions and the emergence of joint action.A wide range of stakeholder groups are required to take part in the multi-stakeholder dialogues, such as:• Representatives from the entire food value chain (e.g. food producers and processors, distributors and retailers, caterers, marketers, traders, consumers);• Health and nutrition professionals;• Private sector;• Community organisations;• Education and research institutions;• Vulnerable groups such as women, youth, indigenous peoples and migrants; and• Those who help to govern territories, protect livelihoods, foster resilience, regenerate ecosystems, participate in climate action and manage freshwater, coastlines, seas and the ocean.A successful multi-stakeholder dialogue event enables multiple stakeholders to connect, share ideas, understand each other's perspectives, develop propositions, examine their potential and nurture the shaping and emergence of pathways to sustainability.The Dialogues provide an environment conducive to open debate, collaboration, consensus-building and shared commitmentmaking and are designed to offer valuable insights for shaping pathways to equitable and sustainable food systems by 2030. Southern Africa is commonly referred to as a climate change 'hotspot' with drought and extreme rainfall events negatively impacting on the food systems of several countries.Mozambique is considered one of the worst affected African countries in terms of extreme climatic events and subsequently held a Dialogue focused on innovative solutions to climate change challenges. Climate change hazards were mentioned to have a devastating effect on the country's food systems by contributing to low agricultural productivity, an increasing occurrence of pests and diseases and a reduction in productive areas. Furthermore, stakeholders noted that climate hazards such as tropical cyclones have led to the destruction of infrastructure (e.g. irrigation systems, roads, warehouses, amongst others) thereby disrupting food value chains.Practices (GAPs), enhancing renewable energy generation, capacity building and improving water use management and land use planning. Botswana has adopted climate smart agriculture (CSA) and conservation agriculture practices and technologies to mitigate climate change, improve production and commercialise agriculture. However, it was noted that there is a need for scaling which requires adequate funding. The country has boosted aquaculture to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, such as methane from meat production. Botswana has also improved their water management through sustainable water use practices and enhanced wastewater management.In addition, Botswana focused on renewable energy production and has conducted research on renewable resources. Malawi has also investigated renewable energy generation through the identification of hydroelectric power opportunities along the Shire River.In terms of shifting to sustainable consumption patterns, Malawi has faced the following challenges:• Lack of a comprehensive definition of sustainable consumption;• Limited consumption of indigenous foods despite being highly nutritious;• High food waste and pollution;• Low dietary diversification;• Low accessibility to some food types in certain parts of the country; and• Increased post-harvest losses.In Zimbabwe, stakeholders indicated that a manual was produced on resilient and sustainable agriculture covering issues on agroecology and other naturepositive production mechanisms. The manual was funded by the Zimbabwe Resilience Building Fund and is to be translated into different local languages. In Masvingo, the Zimbabwe Smallholder Organic Farmers' Forum is implementing soil fertility management and water harvesting schemes. Efforts are also being made to establish a local seed bank.Southern region (Botswana, Malawi, Mozambique, South Africa, Zimbabwe)Proposed solutions from Mozambique's Dialogues included:• The construction of robust infrastructure using modern technologies that ensure greater durability and resilience;• Humanitarian assistance to displaced people, solidarity campaigns, resettlement, agricultural development and income generation projects for displaced and host families;• The establishment of food banks across the different regions; and• The identification and mapping of alternative production areas for affected people.Malawi, a neighbour of Mozambique, has also been adversely affected by climate changerelated hazards such as erratic rainfall patterns and an increase in natural disasters such as tropical cyclones. Stakeholders indicated that due to climatic factors and inadequate agricultural diversification, some regions are now better suited to the production of livestock.The South African Dialogues highlighted the need for improved Early Warning Systems (EWSs) to disseminate information to all members of society. Crisis management methods such as an adaptation strategy, action plan and anticipation protocol were mentioned as key.Mozambique also considered food system resilience to other shocks such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic and associated increased unemployment rate has resulted in lower purchasing power and a reduced demand for food. This, in turn, is resulting in food surpluses at the producer level, higher levels of postharvest losses and food insecurity and malnutrition.Community-level education on contingency planning and risk management was proposed to address the issue of shocks. Stakeholders also mentioned the challenges surrounding armed conflict in the country's central region and terrorist attacks in the north resulting in the abandonment of productive areas further contributing to food insecurity.Mozambique's Dialogues drew attention to the fact that different regions of the country are impacted differently by climate hazards and shocks and that the impacts vary according to the type of sector, i.e. crop, livestock or fisheries. This highlighted the need to manage and prepare for climate hazards at a more localised scale, e.g. provincial.The countries of the Southern region are implementing diverse approaches to move towards environmentally sustainable production and consumption such as by adopting Good AgriculturalIt was noted that land use planning aimed at reducing the overexploitation of natural resources is a key focal area in Mozambique, and in South Africa, former agricultural colleges have strengthened the capacity of local community-based centres of excellence to adopt sustainable agricultural practices.Countries in the Southern region highlighted a need for improved infrastructure to increase market access, the harmonisation of trade standards and better monitoring and dissemination of market information. Stakeholders indicated that the Northern region of Malawi has poor road infrastructure and a hilly topography that affects the accessibility and distribution of food supplies within the region. The country has experienced market failures including unregulated contract farming agreements, uncompetitive prices and dysfunctional and unstructured markets.In Zimbabwe, Knowledge Transfer Africa/ eMkambo is monitoring food-related market information. They are working with the Consumer Council of Zimbabwe (CCZ) and other stakeholders to issue weekly reports on the quality of food in specific markets.Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) and the African Growth and Opportunity Act, respectively. The country has installed new infrastructure (roads, electricity, water and market infrastructure) and improved communication networks in places of deficit.There is a focus on the creation of a transportation network that will ensure the timely delivery of food products and reduce wastage. It was noted that the Government, the private sector and farmers should be encouraged to collaborate to build food storage facilities in remote areas to reduce post-harvest losses. Furthermore, the Government is working to secure a market for local producers with healthy market competition. Mozambique also identified the need for nutritional awareness programmes using the media and food guides.In the South African Dialogues, other potential means for improving nutritional intake included improved dietary data, school feeding programmes, the incorporation of nutritional education in school curricula, the diversification of food production for more balanced diets, improved processing, fortification/enrichment methods and modern food storage practices.The Botswanan Dialogues indicated an improved use of agrochemicals and the promotion of organic farming through ongoing public education. South Africa, Malawi and Zimbabwe highlighted the issue of food waste in their Dialogues.Malawi recognised a food deficit due to poor handling and storage, inadequate budgeting, post-harvest losses and wastage.Cultural celebrations such as weddings and funeral ceremonies were also considered major contributing factors to the country's food waste. In South Africa, food wastage and loss are deemed prevalent in both the production cycle and during consumption. In Zimbabwe, investment in post-harvest infrastructure and value addition was recognised as essential for reducing food waste and loss in informal markets.In the Southern region, common health and nutrition challenges included poor nutritional education and awareness, a lack of dietary diversity, inadequate food safety standards and policy, unaffordability of nutritious foods and low levels of consumption of indigenous food products.Stakeholders in Malawi recognised that the country's food safety challenges were mainly due to a lack of national-level food safety policies, standards and regulations with limited coordination across the sectors on food security, nutrition and food safety (there is no delivery mechanism to enable this). A lack of diversity in local diets, which are dominated by the consumption of maize, was also noted. Stakeholders in both Malawi and South Africa noted that nutritious foods are too expensive.Like Malawi, in Zimbabwe, the Dialogues discussed a need for improved food safety through legislation, i.e. a Food Safety Act, and this is the responsibility of the Ministry of Health and Child Care. It was indicated that the Government of Zimbabwe and partners need to promote and enforce food safety standards in both formal and informal food markets to protect consumers.example, discussions in South Africa mentioned a need for enhanced collaboration with neighbouring countries to ensure a coordinated approach to trade, especially in the face of the recently ratified AfCFTA.Key challenges faced in establishing sustainable value chains in the Southern region included a lack of processing equipment and financial resources for value addition and the need to link value chain actors as well as producers with markets.The Botswanan Dialogues also indicated a need to increase resources and the skills base of agriculture extension officers. Furthermore, transaction costs along value chains need to be reduced to offer consumers better food prices.to drive processing and value addition and that there is a need for food processing equipment.Mozambique recognised that their food value chains are fragmented; and the South African Dialogues discussed the inclusivity of their food value chains and the need to incorporate smallholder and subsistence farmers.Actions proposed to strengthen food value chains in South Africa included:• Mobilise investments in infrastructure and services as well as human and material resources to develop value chains that support sustainable end markets;• Build data on food value chain actors, their profiles, locations, needs and actions; Governance and policy improvements for sustainable food systems varied by country.However, common needs included the maintenance and development of supporting infrastructure, improved alignment of policy, revised land use policy, and better coordination and collaboration between and amongst government departments/ministries and other stakeholders (e.g. non-governmental organisations (NGOs), finance institutions and civil society).In Botswana, stakeholders identified the need to review the National Land Policy to make fertile land available for the youth and to centralise food standards at the Botswana Bureau of Standards for all sectors. A holistic review of policies is needed to align them with international obligations that support sustainable agriculture and food systems. The country further recognised the need for an inclusive approach to the development of policies i.e. from the bottom up.In Malawi, regulatory services are being strengthened and capacity building is taking place in key ministries such as the Ministries of Health, Agriculture and Trade as well as district councils, community structures and institutions such as the Malawi Bureau of Standards.In Zimbabwe, stakeholders highlighted the need to address inadequate environmental governance and impose strict penalties on people who start bushfires for clearing land.In the Mozambiquan Dialogues, the inclusion of Provincial Directorates of Agriculture and Fisheries in policy development was mentioned as key to sustainable food systems. It was noted thatBotswana, Malawi, South Africa and Mozambique have made efforts towards improving their inclusivity both within the Dialogue process and in food systems.For example, Botswana has introduced inclusive policies to improve:• Access to funding and land for production;• Support for the elderly in food systems; and• Mentorship programmes for the youth.Botswana has also installed infrastructure in rural areas to enable people with disabilities to lead active lives and gender equity has been introduced in the allocation of programmes for commercialisation with youth now able to access financing.In Malawi, it was recognised that gender inequalities persist in accessing safe and healthy food products. Stakeholders discussed women and youth marginalisation in agri-food systems, which was attributed to a lack of access to land and resources which are traditionally controlled by men. Women and youth also have limited access to financial opportunities, due to the structural barriers associated with smallholder farmers' access to finances. The limited livelihood opportunities are forcing youth to migrate to South Africa which is resulting in labour shortages in some Malawian districts.South Africa ensured the inclusion of subsistence and smallholder farmers in the engagements for food system transformation;this involved interpretation in 11 local languages. Over 1,000 farmers discussed, in their own languages, the major challenges they faced such as gaining access to land, water and energy. As the engagements were held virtually due to the COVID-19 pandemic, extensionists and government officials used their laptops to convene farmers who did not have access to internet.incentives are to be provided for locally produced inputs (e.g. fish feed) and focus is placed on processing at both artisanal and industrial scales. In addition, it was recognised that supporting infrastructure (e.g. irrigation channels and road networks) coverage and improvement/rehabilitation is needed.The South African Dialogues discussed the need for coordination across government departments and the inclusion of municipalities, NGOs, finance institutions and other formations of civil society. A central coordination structure is required to monitor all food system elements and avoid the duplication of programmes aimed at fighting hunger. Clear legislative and regulatory guidelines are also needed to ensure the active participation of smallholders.Suggested actions from the South African Dialogues included:• The maintenance and development of infrastructure, particularly related to water, electricity, roads, rail and ports;• Comprehensive farmer support services, including mentorship, extension services and agricultural colleges;• Effective land reform and tenure security in conjunction with rural safety;• The revision of curricula to include food systems, indigenous knowledge, food security, food safety and nutrition, and to stimulate research in these areas;• Revisiting, evaluating and up-scaling food security programmes;• Re-educating agricultural practitioners and agro-processors with regards to sustainable practices; and• Policy considerations for digital agriculture, embracing the fourth industrial revolution (4IR), advanced technologies and big data to expand smart farming practices.• There is a need for research in Malawi, as there is a deficit in data and evidence required by policy makers and the private sector to understand the landscape better.• In Zimbabwe, academia, the Zimbabwe Nutrition Association (ZimNA), eMkambo and other stakeholders are willing to engage and research food systems and food consumption.• The South African Dialogues highlighted the importance of researching organic agriculture and indigenous food production, with a focus on heat-and droughttolerant varieties and improved nutritional content.The importance of PPPs for investment, training and knowledge sharing was frequently highlighted in the Dialogues. Botswana has strengthened PPPs, which has improved investment across their value chains. In Zimbabwe, it was mentioned that the Government needs to partner with relevant stakeholders to incentivise smallholder farmers for growing healthy foods. In South Africa, emphasis was placed on partnerships for equality. In Malawi, the Dialogues explored stakeholder engagement for collective action in transforming food systems. It was noted that there are several partners working in the food systems, including NGOs (local and international), faith-based organisations, farmer organisations and cooperatives, government departments, private sector players, amongst other, but they rarely work together to share lessons learnt and best practices. The lack of collaboration was attributed to poor coordination at the regional and district levels, including between ministries, departments and agencies of the Government, despite the decentralised governance system. Opportunities, enablers and recommendations to transform food systems are multi-sectoral in nature and so require a coordinated approach at the regional and district level to be impactful.The Dialogues of four countries emphasised the importance of agricultural and food system research:• In Botswana, the apiculture and aquaculture sectors need to be commercialised and farmers require funding, training and stock (bees and fish). To expand entrepreneurship in these sectors, research is needed as well as the development of appropriate agro-food technologies.Digital technology developments were recognised by Botswana, Mozambique, Malawi and South Africa as important for food system transformation.Botswana has implemented food processing technologies for indigenous products.In Malawi, the development of a digital technology strategy was highlighted as important for communication as well as enhancing agricultural productivity e.g. through adopting agricultural technologies such as CSA, conservation agriculture, permaculture, intercropping, agroforestry, and land and water conservation measures.Mozambique's Dialogues also emphasised the importance of technology for communication in real-time, particularly in the case of warning mechanisms for extreme weather events. In South Africa digital technology was recognised as key for providing data to municipalities on food needs and prices as well as supply chain efficiencies. It was noted that communication technologies can also be used to distribute food amongst users and create awareness on food waste. AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review process • 13 12 • AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review processIn Malawi, the Affordable Input Programme proved contentious. Despite the country experiencing its highest yields in the last five years some stakeholders felt that the programme is an outdated social protection instrument that could be improved through diversification away from maize to other crops such as legumes and livestock. It was suggested that in the Southern region, because of the frequent occurrence of natural disasters, communities are getting used to receiving aid. For example, communities in Chikwawa district are affected by floods every year but are not willing to relocate to other areas. Some stakeholders suggested that the programme contributes to an increased dependence on the Government.In Mozambique, concerns were raised over the establishment of food reserves by the Government. It was argued that the purchasing of agricultural products, their storage and distribution to vulnerable groups will come at a great expense considering the current availability of storage facilities and maintenance requirements.In Zimbabwe, trans-fat, sugar and salt taxation was a contentious issue. It was stated that the taxes could create more problems than solutions and may not even change consumption patterns.In South Africa, stakeholders highlighted the lack of a clear food production and consumption mandate, noting that responsibilities are split between different departments and at different levels of the governance system. There is no coordination and alignment of services and a lot of information is lost. Furthermore, the inexplicit mandate at the local level makes the allocation of financial and human resources difficult for municipalities. The need for sustainable production systems such as agro-ecology and permaculture was discussed in the Malawian Dialogues. It was noted that the current food production system is near collapse as although conventional farming practices yield large amounts of produce, they utilise resources at an unsustainable rate. It was concluded that there is a need to incorporate both approaches.In Mozambique, environmental sustainability was identified as a major point of divergence as increased production and productivity is required to develop domestic industry, but an increased use of agrochemicals is damaging to the environment. It was concluded that a cost-benefit analysis is needed to assess the damaging effects of agrochemicals and it was suggested that the taxes applied to agrochemicals could be used for environmental restoration projects.In South Africa's Dialogues, it was noted that the agro-ecological approach has not been fully optimised. Whilst land needs to be made available for farming, people also need to be taught sustainable land management practices, as land rehabilitation and restoration is costly.In Malawi's Dialogues, mention was made of the need to embrace and consume indigenous food varieties as a major source of nutrition. The promoters of the indigenous food varieties emphasised that such foods have a high nutritional status and are resilient to climate change, on the contrary those championing improved varieties accentuated the high yielding and drought resistant varieties of maize.In Malawi, pesticide use in the Southern region was questioned, as there has been an increased use of pesticides due to the infestation of fall armyworm and increased cultivation of horticultural crops. Participants noted that if the pesticides are not handled and used properly, they can be fatal. For instance, the withdrawal periods on vegetables need to be strictly adhered to for safe consumption.In South Africa, it was mentioned that food system discussions are not inclusive and there is a lack of understanding on the topic due to poor knowledge dissemination. Furthermore, a lack of information on the informal sector hinders food system transformation and resilience.In the Eastern region of Malawi, contradictory discussions took place on the benefits of fishing as a major source of income in the region. Some stakeholders argued that an overreliance on fishing affects crop production as men do not have time to tend to their crops, thereby reducing dietary diversification. Another area of divergence in Malawi's Dialogues was the attraction of tourists to Liwonde National Park. It was argued that tourism positively impacts the district's economy and offers employment to young people. However, other stakeholders said that the tourists bring diseases. • Promoting the use of renewable energy;• Adopting farming practices that prevent land degradation;• Further promoting agroforestry;• Adopting integrated management of pests and diseases;• Ensuring water/irrigation efficiency; and• Promoting soil health management.Eastern region (Comoros, Kenya Mauritius, Madagascar, Rwanda, Seychelles, Sudan)In the Sudanese Dialogues, stakeholders agreed on the need for nature-positive production but highlighted the lack of appropriate policies and legislation. Large areas of land are available for organic farming, but farmers require financial resources and know-how.With regards to trade and market access, the countries from the Eastern region focused on market access for small-scale producers, competition with imported products and a need for capacity building on trade standards.The Kenyan, Rwandan and Mauritian Dialogues discussed the need to enhance market access for small-scale producers. In Mauritius, stakeholders highlighted the need for capacity building of agro processors to meet food safety standards and to be able to compete with imported produce. It was suggested that there should be a dedicated space in shopping malls and other retail outlets for locally processed food items.Competition with food imports was also noted as an issue in the Seychelles. The local market is highly competitive due to the adoption of the fair, free and open market policy and the limited capacity of farmers to exploit economies of scale due to the small size of their farms (average farm size is 8,000 sqm). Producers indicated that global food trade is likely to limit local food production systems as they cannot compete with the prices of imported goods. Local produce is further inaccessible due to poor distribution networks and low levels of organisation of the local food production system.Rwanda highlighted a lack of awareness of regional compliance standards amongst stakeholders and significant gaps in trade standards between East African countries. It was suggested that small and medium-sized enterprises undergo capacity building on trade standards.Food loss and waste was mentioned in the Dialogues of Rwanda, Sudan and Mauritius. In Rwanda, stakeholders mentioned the need for warehouses and other storage infrastructure for times of surplus. In Sudan, it was argued that issues surrounding consumption and food loss are due to culture. In Mauritius, food loss and food waste were a major concern, and the development of postharvest processing was seen as key to improving shelf life, marketability and reducing postharvest losses. Support is being provided to agro-entrepreneurs in the development of value-added products from local fruits and vegetables such as gluten-free breadfruit and cassava flour, ginger paste, turmeric paste, lime paste, guava fruit paste, dehydrated papaya and fruit paste sorbet.Stakeholders from Rwanda and Sudan understood the importance of environmentally sustainable food production, but development was hindered by barriers such as a lack of suitable policies and legislation, inadequate knowledge on sustainable land management practices and a need for financial resources.Stakeholders in Rwanda's Dialogues discussed the limited adoption of CSA practices and technologies despite the prevalence of soil degradation due to agricultural malpractices. It was noted that inadequate knowledge on the use of chemical fertilisers and pesticides is causing soil and water pollution and is negatively impacting pollinators.• Promote tailored ecosystem-based approaches for smaller scales of production (e.g. micro-agriculture, urban agriculture and landless agriculture);• Promote the recovery and reuse of organic waste to restore soil fertility;• Appropriately manage the application of inorganic fertilisers to reduce GHG emissions;• Enhance awareness on the importance of maintaining ecosystems and biodiversity at the local level;• Scale up initiatives to restore/rehabilitate degraded ecosystems and promote indigenous species in agroforestry and landscape restoration in high-risk areas; and• Protect biodiversity through awareness trainings at the community level.In the Seychelles, stakeholders discussed the gaps in value and supply chains such as sourcing difficulties, access to technology, limited farm workers in the local market, regional temperature-controlled storage facilities, demand and supply management platforms as well as inadequate services from support institutions. The Mauritian Dialogues indicated a lack of adequate processing, storage and distribution facilities. Similarly, the Rwandan Dialogues made mention of a need for increased investment in food distribution channels (including cold chains), markets, post-harvest handling and processing.• Mobilising investments in infrastructure and services as well as human and material resources to develop value chains that support sustainable end markets;• Building data on actors in food value chains, their profiles, locations, needs and actions given the risks;• Strengthening PPPs by promoting mechanisms for coordination; and• Recognition of informal markets and value chains as important components of the food system.AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review process • 19 18 • AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review processIn Sudan, policy on food security exists but the implementation of the action plan requires the mobilisation of resources.Furthermore, stakeholders agreed that food security policy and legislation need to be developed with a focus on prices which form the main barrier to accessing nutritious food.The Rwandan Dialogues focused on land use planning and the introduction of commercial farming through the implementation of the Land Use and Development Master Plan, 2050. Discussions were also held on increasing the reach of extension services to smallholder farmers, the promotion of small livestock husbandry and the lack of a coordinated multi-sectoral approach for promoting CSA practices. It was mentioned that CSA practices could be incentivised through subsidies and tax breaks as well as by creating stronger partnerships with institutions such as the Rwanda Institute for Conservation Agriculture. Enhanced inter-ministerial coordination amongst the different sectors to determine the trade-offs between agriculture and the environment was highlighted as well as the need to strengthen policy coherence and implementation. Rwanda also put in place legislative frameworks to promote healthy diets and policies to reduce food waste at all levels. Coordination mechanisms were established at both national and local levels.Kenya's Dialogues focused on partnerships to enable small-scale farmers to access credit, training and to boost innovation to enhance self-sufficiency and reduce dependency.Intergovernmental collaboration, the control of imports, and policy coherence and implementation were identified as common challenges to food system governance amongst the Eastern region's countries.In the Seychelles, stakeholders indicated a need for better coordination and action to implement and drive agricultural and food system-related policy decisions. The benefits of elevating key policy objectives and strategic choices in the form of a legal instrument were debated at length. There was bipartisan alignment and agreement in favour of the proposal to draft a Food Security Bill to ensure policy continuity. Furthermore, there was general agreement that sector activities should be taxed but according to a different taxation regime.The Comoros Dialogues focused on improving livestock health through improved control of imported animals at borders. Mauritius addressed animal product importation policies that are disadvantageous to local farmers.In Kenya, it was noted that major discrepancies exist between the national and county functions with agriculture being a devolved function and policy making still the responsibility of the national government. Policy needs to be coherent and the overlapping roles and division of policy making responsibility between the two levels of government needs to be clarified. Furthermore, within the counties, there is a lack of alignment in agricultural policies. Intergovernmental cooperation, institutional coordination, public participation and stakeholder involvement is required. Kenya is also working to develop legislation and policy frameworks to anchor pastoralism as a component of sustainable food systems as well as strengthen the policy environment to enhance and protect agricultural land in the Central Region Economic Bloc.Gender and social inclusivity was a major topic in the Dialogues with focus placed on women and youth inclusion. In Mauritius, the need for training and awareness of producers on GAPs was identified with special mention made of the inclusion of vulnerable groups. It was also noted that youth need to be better integrated into agriculture by providing free training.In Rwanda and Sudan, stakeholders discussed the role of youth and women in achieving sustainable, equitable and resilient food systems. The Mauritius, Rwandan and Madagascan Dialogues all highlighted the important role of the private sector in achieving inclusivity, and the need for improved coordination between parties. Madagascar's Dialogues focused on empowering women in food systems and strengthening the commitment of the private sector and civil society to support family farms and farmers' organisations.The Kenya Youth in Agriculture Strategy includes robust measures to meaningfully engage young people in agriculture. In SEKEB, it was noted that agroprocessing and value-addition initiatives can be used to enhance the capacity and skills of young people as well as provide meaningful employment for them. It was noted that to leverage such opportunities, the vulnerable groups require ownership rights and access to productive resources such as land, finance, digital agriculture and technological solutions, training and access to data and information.The Rwandan Dialogues also identified barriers around creating employment for marginalised groups and the following actions were proposed:• Establish appropriate credit funds to address the limited access to finance for small-scale entrepreneurs and marginalised groups; and• Promote inclusive consultation processes and participatory assessments of land degradation for the design of effective ecosystem restoration strategies.Nutritional education, food safety awareness campaigns, improved food safety standards and enhanced local production were identified as key action areas by stakeholders in Mauritius and the Seychelles. The Mauritian food safety standards are to be reviewed and slaughterhouses relocated. Stakeholders noted a need for training, support from authorities and incentives to boost the sector. Consumers are encouraged to eat locally produced foods (e.g. cassava, potato, breadfruit, eddoes) and to undertake their own production such as roof gardening and urban agriculture.In the Seychelles, education is needed on the nutritional value of whole locally produced food, particularly as fast food consumption is increasing to the extent that it is a default option for lunch in most schools, and in many food outlets. Stakeholders indicated that there has been limited to no investment in promoting local farm produce and very few campaigns to address fast food advertising. Without action it is expected that fast food consumption will increase along with associated dietary problems.To increase local food productionin the Seychelles it was suggested to:• Increase investment in turnkey farms and allocate them to young farmers;• Establish an innovation fund; and• Revise legislation and submit the food system transformation policy and strategy to the National Assembly for final discussion, alignment and consolidation by mid-October 2021. • Enable more reliable access to usable and shareable data; and• Conduct quality analyses to support evidencebased decisions on performance management, M&E, research and policy.It was also noted in Kenya's Dialogues that access to ICTs in both urban and rural areas is growing rapidly, but progress is unequal both geographically and socioeconomically. For example, in many areas women and youth have less access to smartphones and digital services. In SEKEB, it was determined that investment is needed in innovation and technology such as irrigation, the use of digital agriculture tools in extension services and managing post-harvest losses through food processing technologies.The Rwandan Dialogues also focused on the modernisation of agriculture and the need to strengthen ICT. Special mention was made of the need to:• Leverage innovative technologies, such as satellite/drone technologies, to enhance data systems linked to agricultural insurance;• Adopt technologies that improve yields whilst reducing GHG emissions and land degradation; and• Use labour-saving technologies along the whole value chain.The The focus of discussions on technology and innovation were on the importance of agricultural data for evidence-based decision making and the need to strengthen and improve access to ICT.The Comoros Dialogues discussed the importance of strengthening advocacy and the need for government, together with other technical and financial partners, to mobilise funds to support technological innovations and the modernisation of agriculture and fishing. In Kenya, the SEKEB Dialogues mentioned the need for private sector investments and financing tools to de-risk food systems in the ASAL counties. It was further noted that the creation of an SEKEB Bank could boost the interest of young people in agri-businesses by providing access to much needed capital.Similar to the Seychelles, Rwanda emphasised the need for financial services at affordable interest rates. Stakeholders mentioned that farmers' cooperatives and organisations could be used to increase awareness on good agricultural extension and advisory services as well as to establish a commercial/agricultural bank. A need for banks to provide financial literacy programmes and insurance services was also highlighted. Stakeholders indicated that current subsidy programmes are inadequate for building short-term resilience in smallholder farmers and there is a lack of funds for innovative initiatives for improving ecosystems and biodiversity.The Mauritian Dialogues indicated a need for investment to modernise farming practices and stakeholders. In Sudan, stakeholders noted a need for investment in infrastructure in both the agriculture and industry sectors with special mention made of the need to finance smallholder farmers.In the Rwandan Dialogues, stakeholders disagreed on the percentage of insurance premiums that should be paid for by the Government. It was mentioned that in some parts of India, 80%-90% was required to attract interest compared with only 40% in Rwanda. Others noted that this was not feasible in Rwanda and that emphasis should instead be placed on integrating crop insurance into existing social protection programmes.In Mauritius, the granting of import permits for vegetables that are produced locally proved to be an area of contention for stakeholders.In Rwanda, there were disagreements on the role that insurance companies should play with some arguing that they were not doing enough whilst others indicated that the issue lies in farmers' lack of trust in the companies. This fed into a larger discussion on PPPs and the balance that must be found between business interests and social protection.There was some divergence over the promotion of biodiversity in the Rwandan Dialogues, as well as the use of more nutritious and drought-resistant crop species. In Madagascar, some stakeholders insisted on the urgency of adapting existing techniques to address climate change challenges whilst others stressed the need to carry out in-depth studies on the actions to be implemented and the need to transfer knowledge to the primary players concerned.In the Rwandan Dialogues, the use of technology to disseminate EWS information was mentioned as a possible 'game changing' solution, however, there was divergence on how to make it user-friendly and accessible. The successful case study highlighted a smartphone application developed by the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) of the United Nations. The application provided weather information to improve farmers' decision making. However, it was argued that such an approach may not work in Rwanda as not all farmers, particularly the most vulnerable, have access to a smartphone. Simple SMS messages were suggested as an alternative solution, but the effectiveness of transmitting complex information in such a limiting format is likely to prove challenging.Rwandan stakeholders argued on the importance of harmonising trade standards across East Africa and raising the awareness of smallholder farmers to regional standards. It was noted that some countries, such as Kenya, have higher standards than their neighbours. The consultation of experts on issues related to policies, food safety regulations and post-harvest handling to harmonise policy was suggested. Others noted that while differences in standards exist, there are legal and economic frameworks in place, notably the East African Community trade forum, to address trade disputes in the interests of vulnerable stakeholders. It was deduced that raising farmers' awareness of standards is key so that they can export to other markets competitively.The countries of the Western region discussed the climate hazards they faced and the resulting impacts on both natural and human systems. Conflict was identified as another driver adversely impacting upon food production in the region.The Ghanaian Dialogues highlighted reduced yields due to water scarcity in the dry season and flooding in the rainfall season. A continuous decline in soil fertility was also noted. The need for improved and localised irrigation systems was emphasised, as rain-fed agriculture can no longer sustain the levels of food production needed.Nigerian stakeholders noted that the food system experiences shocks and stresses such as flooding, soil erosion and conflict. Poverty, unemployment and insufficient food reserves were recognised to further increase the vulnerability of local food systems. Areas to the south-east of the country have been affected by insecurity due to farmer-herder conflict, which has led to the destruction of crops, forced migration, death and forms of sexual violence. The Dialogues highlighted the need for social protection mechanisms and agricultural insurance.In the event of shocks affecting smallholder farmers in Sierra Leone, it was recognised that the Government and partners should establish seed banks to support farmers in reviving their activities. The seed banks were also noted as being important for preventing the loss of crop varieties and certain species of animals.It was noted in the Western region's Dialogues that environmental degradation and pollution due to human activities is already prevalent and adversely affecting food systems. It was suggested that rebates be issued to producers who adopt sustainable land management practices and policy be revised, especially in relation to land tenure and use.The Gambian Dialogues emphasised the considerable degradation of the country's resource base over the years. This was attributed to deforestation, overfishing, inappropriate fishing nets, the poisoning of marine life, land degradation Western region (Benin, Burkina Faso, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Nigeria)AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review process • 25 24 • AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review processThe Western region is working towards sustainable food value chains, common areas for improvement included an increased access to good quality inputs (especially seeds), enhanced mechanisation to maximise production and the establishment of processing facilities to reduce postharvest losses.In Sierra Leone's Dialogues, the high cost of agricultural inputs (particularly agro-chemicals) was highlighted, as well as the need for improved regulation. Special mention was made of the need for affordable quality seeds, with a preference for input dealers not only at the chiefdom level but at the district level.In Nigeria, stakeholders indicated a need for value chain and development financing by the Central Bank of Nigeria to increase food accessibility and safety. The need for mechanisation in all value chain activities was mentioned as key to enhancing efficiencies, improving productivity and encouraging youth inclusion. It was also noted that Nigerian food systems could be enhanced, and food safety improved, through the provision of high-quality inputs, the adoption of good agronomy practices and the management of postharvest activities.In Niger, stakeholders indicated that legume, fruit and vegetable value chains are weak.Processing was noted as inadequate, forming the weakest link of the value chain and resulting in postharvest/post-production losses. Major investments are deemed necessary to strengthen food value chain links and improve food preservation, e.g. through cold chains. Milk collection and processing units need to be created and promoted in each region. The millet value chain is limited by the unavailability of suitable seeds, soil degradation, poor access to agricultural inputs and low levels of mechanisation. Vegetable value chains, particularly for tomatoes, are also affected by poor access to suitable seeds. The fish value chain was noted as having great potential but needs to be strengthened with the development of inland aquaculture, which could be achieved by popularising national fisheries policy.A lack of access to food processing facilities was also highlighted in the Ghanaian Dialogues.In Ghana, Sierra Leone, Nigeria and Niger, stakeholders mentioned that poor road networks (and rail in Nigeria) limit market access and contribute to post-harvest losses. Additionally, the need for appropriate transport such as refrigerated trucks for perishable products and other cold chain components was noted by stakeholders in Niger's Dialogues.Stakeholders in Ghana identified the need for vulnerable small-scale farmers to be protected from the importation of foreign goods and Sierra Leone's Dialogues discussed the need for a robust commodity market system to ensure price stability. and frequent bushfires. Some of the adaptive measures undertaken to mitigate the degradation include sensitisation on bushfire control measures, agroforestry, regulated fishing and fishing nets and the creation of appropriate policies. It was further noted that poor agricultural practices on slopes have contributed to soil erosion leading to a loss of topsoil and a subsequent decline in soil fertility.In Ghana's Dialogues, focus was placed on cocoa which is a major cash crop in the Ashanti region and a key source of income for farmers.Cocoyam was noted as an important indigenous crop, but production levels keep dropping due to the use of herbicides on cocoa farms. In addition, it was indicated that local fishermen use a lot of chemicals in their fishing activities and this, coupled with other factors, has caused a decline in fish stocks.• Improving the productivity of small-scale farmers in a climate-smart and nutritionsensitive way;• Adopting improved farming practices to increase food production and productivity;• Promoting practices that prevent a loss of indigenous and traditional foods and promote the natural regeneration of trees; and• Avoiding destructive farming activities that degrade natural resources such as the uncontrolled use of agrochemicals.Senegal's Dialogues highlighted a drive for local consumption and key areas for improvement included the construction of cold rooms, enhanced processing of local products and improved marketing. To ensure the resilience and sustainability of food systems it was proposed that a rebate be paid to companies for actions to preserve the environment. It was also noted that water management needs to be promoted, particularly rainwater harvesting, to allow for out of season production.In Nigeria's Dialogues, key actions given by stakeholders for protecting the environment included:• Promoting the use of organic fertilisers;• Appropriate use and management of herbicides and pesticides;• Enforcement of existing laws and regulations to prevent further environmental degradation;• Protection of ecosystems against agricultural expansion;• Efficient recycling of waste;• Use of cover crops to reduce soil degradation and erosion;• Investing in the development of improved crop varieties for higher yields and improved attributes including biofortification;• Facilitating the sustainable management of food production systems to benefit the environment and people through GAPs;• Restoring degraded ecosystems and rehabilitating the soil for sustainable food production through renewed afforestation efforts; and• Scaling up the use of organic soil practices, crop rotation and intercropping.AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review process • 27 26 • AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review processIn Gambia's Dialogues it was noted that a lack of access to quality health services in rural areas has led to high under five, infant and neo-natal mortalities.In Sierra Leone's Dialogues it was noted that there is a lack of food reserves, highlighting the need for formation of food banks, the provision of improved storage facilities and the manufacturing of key foods for improved preservation.In Ghana, there are no standards for regulating produce especially those for local markets. Food safety standards and labelling need improvement by following guidelines such as the Codex Alimentarius. The Ghanaian dialogues also mentioned the improper use of agrochemicals in farming, processing and retail and the need for adherence to safe practices. With respect to consumption, there is no screening for food vendors on diseases such as typhoid, which puts consumers at high risk. Furthermore, there is a lack of education and low nutritional literacy amongst the population. Ghanaian stakeholders also described an absence of food-based dietary guidelines, a lack of nutritional standards and the unaffordability of nutritious food. A need for recognition of the value of healthy indigenous foods and a return to their consumption was further highlighted.In Sierra Leone, poor dietary diversity is a major concern for both children and adults and proposed actions included improved nutrition education and scaling up sensitisation on the country's Food-Based Dietary Guideline for Healthy Eating. It was identified that the health system is weak, and health system strengthening can assist in improving the health status especially of women and children under the age of five years.The Nigerian Dialogues focused on the adoption of healthy diets through the production and availability of healthy and safe foods. To ensure agricultural systems produce good quality and nutritionally adequate food, stakeholders recommended the promotion of the use of high yielding crop varieties and livestock breeds to increase productivity and subsidies for Stakeholders in Ghana recognised the need to strengthen their fragmented food value chains, with actions such as:• Mobilising investments in infrastructure and services as well as human and material resources to develop value chains supporting sustainable end markets;• Building data on actors in food value chains, their profiles, locations, needs and actions given the risks;• Strengthening PPPs by promoting mechanisms for coordination; and• Recognising informal markets and value chains as important components of the food system.The Western region's food waste was largely attributed to a lack of storage facilities, limited food processing and poor food handling. In Nigeria, stakeholders discussed the reduction of food loss and waste through innovative food storage and processing methods from the point of harvest to the point of consumption. The rehabilitation of, and use of, silos in each Local Government Area was suggested. In addition, to reduce environmental impacts and health and safety it was suggested that the recycling of food waste products be improved.Stakeholders in Ghana described the need for warehouses and other storage infrastructure in times of surplus. Key areas of discussion included hermetic bags to reduce post-harvest losses of cereals and legumes and healthy food processing techniques to increase the shelf life of locally produced agricultural commodities. In Sierra Leone, stakeholders suggested that the Government improve access to affordable electricity supply to reduce food waste, particularly in urban areas. farmers. To enhance consumption of nutritious, safe, and diverse foods, stakeholders suggested a nutrition awareness programme to assist consumers in making healthy food choices against the dangers of contaminated food either through harmful chemicals, poor processing methods, or poor health and safety practices. It was also indicated that nutritional education in schools, hospitals and marketplaces needs to be strengthened.The Western region recognised the important role that women play in food systems, despite their unequal opportunities (e.g. access to land, financial resources and information), and the need to empower them for transformational change. In addition, stakeholders from Ghana and Nigeria highlighted the need to attract youth to food systems through improved technology.In the Gambian Dialogues, stakeholders indicated that women form more than 50% of the farming population and in some regions they are the main producers of vegetables, rice and groundnuts. However, despite their contributions, they are disadvantaged by a lack of access to key production components and inputs, particularly land, financial resources and technical know-how. It was noted that due to cultural norms and traditions, women in Gambia typically do not own land and so do not have collateral to obtain bank loans.In the Ghanaian Dialogues, women's access to credit was identified as a key challenge in the agricultural sector. There is also a lack of access to gender-sensitive equipment especially for small-scale processing. Furthermore, food production is currently unattractive to the youth who are not replacing the aging farmer population. Suggested actions to address this included the deployment of mobile agricultural extension services and digitisation. It was also recommended that the Government purchase/ subsidise land for agricultural purposes and engage traditional landholders to address land tenure challenges for easier access by women and youth.AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review process • 29 28 • AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review processThe following actions were suggested for improving gender and social inclusion in Nigerian food systems:• Encouraging and supporting the establishment and functioning of cooperative societies for women and other vulnerable groups;• Promoting the 'Village Savings Association Model' to facilitate access to credit, inputs, and trainings;• Providing access to land for cultivation by vulnerable groups at the community level;• Addressing social norms and practices that systematically provide privileges to some groups over others;• Eliminating access barriers to markets, and social exclusion for vulnerable groups;• Ensuring social protection schemes reach the intended beneficiaries;• Promoting the use of clean energy; and• Identifying alternative sources of funding for interventions, other than government.In Sierra Leone, it was also noted that women play an important role in food production and have unequal access to agricultural inputs. As was mentioned by Ghanian stakeholders, there is a need for gender-friendly processing tools and equipment. Furthermore, there is a need for the inclusion of women in policy formulation and implementation along the food system chain and linkages.The Nigerian Dialogues highlighted the importance of including youth in the agricultural sector using technology and e-commerce.Nigerian stakeholders noted that over 60% of the farmers in the south-east are women, and that they have unequal access to productive resources. It was recommended that the south-east develop and implement Social Investment Programmes that take vulnerable groups into consideration. Improving women farmers' access to land was seen as a key means for enhancing food production and security. Women groups should be created and encouraged to participate in food system decision-making.In Gambia, the effective coordination of relevant policies on food systems was highlighted as a major issue in the attainment of the SDGs by 2030. Existing policies need to be reviewed and aligned ensuring equity, justice, empowerment and sustainability for all. It was noted that the Government needs to honour its commitments to national and international agreements/treaties such as the Malabo Declaration (committing 10% of public expenditure to agriculture). The need for national and regional level food reserves for building resilience to vulnerabilities, shocks and stresses was also emphasised.It was highlighted in the Sierra Leone Dialogues that the land tenure system is affecting commercial farming and needs to be resolved through the allocation of land for agricultural purposes. Another area of concern was that of mining companies degrading land and aquatic habitats that could be used for crop, livestock and fish production, respectively. It was suggested that land be reclaimed from the mining sector for food production. The need for modern farming technology, irrigation systems and crop intensification were highlighted as well as the waiving of agricultural input taxes for the next five years. The Sierra Leone Dialogues also that there is no standalone policy to address community disputes arising from the destruction of farmers' crops by grazing animals.The Nigerian Dialogues discussed the need to review existing policies that limit access to resources e.g. the Land Tenure System/Land Use Act. It was suggested that court rulings be enforced to grant women the right to inherit land. Stakeholders also recommended awareness programmes for policy makers on the importance of food systems for food and nutrition security, job creation and economic development, and the challenges facing food systems together with actions needed to fix them. Other recommendations included strengthening divisions within different ministries, departments and agencies of government, and ensuring budgetary provisions for nutritional programme implementation.It was suggested that Niger learn from the experience of Kenya and South Africa, who have established relatively low prices for fresh produce and have implemented import policies to fill gaps in the local market.Discussions in Burkina Faso suggested that national policies relating to food systems and their state of implementation are adequate but could be enhanced. It is important that national policies guarantee access to sufficient, diverse, healthy and nutritious food for all, including vulnerable people as well as ensure the adoption of good dietary practices and healthy lifestyles by consumers. • Promoting improved technologies for processing, preservation and packaging of food products;• Facilitating national producers' access to local and international markets;• Incentives for the development of partnership contracts between large urban suppliers and small rural family farmers for an adequate food supply for cities;• Promotion of efficient networks for the equitable distribution of food products;• Trade tax exemptions for the food and pharmaceutical sectors;• Considering the food sector's action plans in the multi-year expenditure planning document;• Popularisation of texts (laws, decrees, orders) and policy documents relating to the country's food systems;• Facilitating access to resources, financial support for the development of said systems; and• Strengthening of national research programmes on food and nutritional issues in Senegal. In the Nigerian Dialogues, it was noted that strong partnerships between government, the private sector and other funding agencies (both local and international) are needed to transform the food system. Emphasis was placed on the need for collaboration between national and state agencies and all relevant stakeholders, to be better able to understand the nature of the food system challenge and the gaps to be filled by agricultural extension workers.Stakeholders in Ghana made special mention of a need for partnerships to mobilise financial resources.particularly in the areas of seed production, GAPs and food preservation. Research institutes need to be better positioned to engage in demand-driven research. It was suggested that the private and public sectors establish a partnership to enhance domestic R&D capacity and ensure the dissemination and adoption of viable R&D output amongst Nigerian farmers.In Niger, discussions suggested that research is poorly funded, and the results are not adequately disseminated. Sufficient budget is needed for research to contribute to rural development through innovations and advice to users. A partnership framework needs to be developed between research institutions.In Ghana, stakeholders suggested that agriculture should be made attractive to the youth, however, some indicated that the youth are already attracted to agriculture but face other difficulties e.g. entering the poultry industry. The youth need support from the Government including access to arable land.In Nigeria, a key challenge mentioned by stakeholders was lobbying and interference by special interest groups such as large multinationals and some local industries. It was noted that to achieve equitable access to affordable healthy diets, the Government will need to commit to reducing the influence of interest groups within food systems and open the market to what people really need, rather than what food companies want consumers to buy. This would simultaneously improve consumption patterns. Furthermore, there were divergent views on the Government's actions towards improving nutrition, for example, some stakeholders were of the opinion that the Government is doing a considerable amount of sensitisation especially on breastfeeding, whereas others were of the opinion that the Government could do more in addressing issues concerning undernutrition e.g. poverty.In Guinea, contentious issues included the management of land disputes; conflict management between actors, particularly farmers and breeders; and policy for granting land to youth and women.In Niger, stakeholder opinions varied on subsidising agricultural inputs. Some stakeholders disagreed with the action saying it was only viable in the short term, as subsidies can create dependency, distort competition and private sector activities, and manifest a significant financial burden for the state in the long term. Other stakeholders were adamant that Niger cannot eliminate hunger without subsidising agricultural inputs and equipment.AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review process • 33 32 • AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review processThe Nigerian Dialogues highlighted the following technology and innovation needs to increase resilience and productivity with a focus on nutrition:• Scale up technologies, particularly in relation to cold chains, to tackle post-harvest food losses;• Enhance innovation in agricultural production e.g. hydroponics, drip irrigation, mechanisation, biotechnology and genome editing;• Adopt modern farming techniques by providing farmers with technologies and farm implements that can be maintained by local farmers;• Use of drones for the application of fertiliser, herbicides and pesticides;• Conduct geological surveys and mapping for agricultural areas and those prone to insecurity;• Group security systems including community watches; and• Undertake soil and nutrient mapping, land banking and weather modelling to control poor farming systems.In Ghana, stakeholders mentioned the need to digitise food systems, for example, by using artificial intelligence, blockchain farming and hydroponics.Ghana, Sierra Leone, Nigeria and Niger all indicated constraints in accessing finance for healthy and sustainable foods. In Sierra Leone, policies surrounding access to finance for agricultural activities need to be reviewed as the conditions for loan repayment are not suitable for farmers. The current interest rates in commercial banks are too high and the period for repayment of loans needs to be specified in financial loan policies.to work with other partners who have agricultural know-how to create access to micro-finance for the youth and/or female entrepreneurs, in combination with business coaching and advisory services. In Niger, it was recommended that donors contribute to sector pooled funds in addition to the Investment Plan for Food and Nutritional Security.In Ghana, it was suggested by some stakeholders that there are too many 'middlemen' and that they inflate food prices. On the other hand, some stakeholders said the middlemen were important for linking farmers to markets.In Benin's Dialogues, farmers and herders had differing opinions on the management of corridors for livestock movement.In the Nigerian Dialogues, stakeholders disagreed on the assumption that youth want to work in agriculture or agroprocessing. The notion that a large proportion of youth is ready to be employed in low-paying, low-tech industries might be misplaced, and the question 'what do the youth want?' needs to be answered to inform demographic transition and youth policy design.by insurgency where women are becoming the household head. It was clear from different submissions that what is seen as a discriminatory social norm against a vulnerable group in one community might be a normal way of life in other communities, depending on the values and level of social indoctrination of the people. However, the issue of concern is the impact of gender inequality on food systems in the region. Some believed that women should be organised into groups, e.g. cooperatives for stronger participation whilst others felt that most women involved in farming have already formed producer groups, cooperatives, and associations and that the key challenge lies in access to production knowledge, technology and resources.In Sierra Leone, the right for women to own land was strongly debated. All the traditional leaders were against the motion for women to own land and the women representatives argued for it. Women argued that they are key players in the agricultural sector and deserve to own land. In addition, it was noted that the Government input supply chain model for community youth farms needs to be reviewed. Feedback from most participants indicated an appreciation for the Government's job creation efforts, however, some participants believed that the model for accessing inputs through mobile money needs to be revised to a voucher system.In Ghana, stakeholders disagreed on whether the country's food system had the capacity to prepare for, withstand and recover from climate change-related crises and shocks. Initially a few participants argued that the food system was resilient to climate change, however, their perceptions changed after a discussion on the indicators of resilience. Although the stakeholders agreed that the food system was vulnerable to climate change, they also noted the potential for resilience building.A few areas of divergence emerged during the Gambian Dialogues, particularly around land use and humanwildlife conflict. Stakeholders from the forestry and food production value chains could not agree on the expansion of agricultural lands at the expense of forests. Rice farmers complained about hippopotamuses invading and destroying their fields, but as they are protected animals, they cannot hunt them. This has resulted in lengthy discussions between the agriculture and wildlife departments.In Nigeria, divergences addressed the issue of a 'healthy diet' versus a 'sustainable diet'. A healthy diet was said to include \"a diversity of foods that are safe and provide levels of energy appropriate to age, sex, disease status and physical activity as well as essential micronutrients\". However, it was noted that healthy diets and sustainable diets are not mutually inclusive. Evidence suggests that synergies can be identified (e.g. reducing animal protein in meat-based diets) but are often exceedingly difficult to achieve. On the other hand, completely decoupling healthy diets from the sustainability of value chains that deliver them would also not be desirable from a food system, environmental and climate change perspective.Another divergence in the Nigerian Dialogues was on the establishment of Rural Grazing Area settlements to address the issues of livestock production and GHG emissions. It was highlighted that State governments need to meet with relevant stakeholders on the suitability of the programme given the diverse ecosystems that will be affected. In addition, it was noted that inorganic fertilisers are preferred to organic types, and there is a need for sensitisation/ capacity building on the benefits associated with the latter. Public awareness campaigns were central to enhancing sustainable consumption and production practices in Morocco and Tunisia. In Morocco, public awareness programmes were strengthened and operationalised to institutionalise information and training campaigns within structures responsible for disseminating good agricultural and food safety practices. Successful experiences were disseminated through mass media and social networks. Tunisia followed a similar approach to Morocco, using public awareness programmes to encourage a shift towards sustainable consumption and production patterns. Users were educated onIn Mauritania, stakeholders identified the key constraints to food security as the use of outdated farming techniques, the low technical capacity of producers, and difficulties in accessing land and funds.Nutritional awareness programmes and the promotion of healthier diets using the media and food guides were deemed necessary by Tunisia. In Morocco, the need to recognise the nutritional value of indigenous foods and return to their consumption was highlighted.Moroccan stakeholders recognised that the economic empowerment of women through access to resources, services, economic opportunities and decision making contributes to improved food security and more efficient and sustainable food systems.• Supporting women to exercise their fundamental rights;• Facilitating their access to employment, natural resources, services and markets;• Enabling entrepreneurship; and• Promoting their participation in political and governance processes.Northern region (Egypt, Mauritania, Morocco, Tunisia) the need to protect water and soil resources, the recycling of wastewater and the adoption of GAPs.In Egypt, stakeholders identified the key barriers to sustainable food systems as water scarcity, population growth, urbanisation, persistent food safety and quality challenges and the prevalence of unhealthy consumption patterns.Stakeholders in the Tunisian Dialogues suggested a review of international trade rules to make them better suited to sustainable food systems. The protection of producers through the establishment of a monitoring system on supply and market prices was also highlighted. In Mauritania, stakeholders indicated a need for improved import regulation, particularly of milk products.The Moroccan Dialogues described the need for fair, secure and sustainable supply chains to ensure the responsible use of natural resources, reduced food loss and food waste, and for making sustainability an easy choice for consumers.In Morocco, restaurant owners shared their concern about disposing of large amounts of uneaten food. The wastage of food shocked stakeholders working with food insecure households and presented an area for collaboration. In Morocco, it was established that agricultural trade and social policies facilitate access to affordable, safe and nutritious food for all. The need to review and update and/ or operationalise legislative mechanisms in the sectors of water, climate change, biodiversity, energy transition, women's empowerment, health security, nutritional quality, food loss and waste and the circular economy was emphasised. Furthermore, the Dialogues highlighted the misalignment between action logic and coordination mechanisms, which has limited the efficiency of interventions.There is also a need for improved participation and coordination, which can be achieved through the active engagement of all stakeholders in the development and implementation of strategies and the strengthening of coordination structures.Morocco's stakeholders indicated the need for an increase in funding for scientific research in the agricultural sector.Stakeholders also discussed the need for integrated and multidisciplinary research.In Tunisia, the use of digital technologies for the production of educational materials on consumption and sustainable production (e.g. applications, games, social networks) was discussed. Furthermore, digital applications could be developed to promote networking for the recovery and redistribution of food products and leftover meals. The strengthening of EWSs and digitisation of agriculture was mentioned as key.It was highlighted in the Mauritanian Dialogues, that the country has promoted and popularised agricultural mechanisation.In Tunisia, discussions took place on the geographic scale of regional food models.It was noted that some models are focused on the importance of returning to traditional foods specific to localities, whilst others focused on the relaunch of regional food models such as the Mediterranean diet.In Mauritania, some stakeholders mentioned the need to introduce differential taxes for imported products to reduce competition with the local market.Other stakeholders suggested that it would be more beneficial to support local producers with equipment and inputs, considering the global trade agreements in place (World Trade Organisation (WTO), AfCFTA and the Economic Community of West African States).In Mauritania, it was recognised that budget allocations need to be increased to meet basic infrastructure and human resource needs. In addition, smallholder and family farms require better access to financing and agricultural credit. Gabon's Dialogues highlighted the importance of looking at food system resilience not only with a climate change lens, but also addressing other shocks such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic and associated increased unemployment rate has resulted in lower purchasing power and a reduced demand for food. This in turn is resulting in food surpluses at the producer level, higher levels of post-harvest losses and food insecurity and malnutrition. Communitylevel education on contingency planning and risk management were suggested actions to address the issue of shocks. In addition, Gabon described the need to favour local production to strengthen the resilience of food systems in the face of crises such as COVID-19, which disrupted food value chains and importation.Central region (CAR, Cameroon, DRC, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon)In the Central region's Dialogues, improved land tenure, capacity building on good land management practices and equal access to subsidies were some of the action areas given to enhance sustainable food production. It was recognised in the Equatorial Guinea Dialogues that comprehensive and diversified training is needed for technicians and farmers to increase agricultural production. In addition, the Environmental Organisations Sector insisted on the importance of promoting the sustainable management of natural resources and biodiversity conservation. • Improved dietary data;• School feeding programmes;• Incorporation of nutritional education in school curricula;• Diversification of food production for more balanced diets;• Improved processing;• Fortification/enrichment methods; and• Modern food storage practices.but could be resolved through following guidelines such as the Codex Alimentarius. Consumers' knowledge of food safety was described as poor with a clear need for awareness creation.In Gabon, it was mentioned that people living with HIV are now included in agricultural projects with grants available to them to purchase agricultural land. The FAO has committed to continue supporting the empowerment of people living with HIV by providing training on vegetable production and balanced diets. Land has also been allocated to refugees for agricultural and commercial activities.Gabon's Dialogues. The youth have been mobilised through the digitalisation and mechanisation of agriculture but there is still a need to promote agricultural professions and provide incentives to In Gabon's Dialogues, special mention was made of the regional imbalance between farmers in the northern countries who benefit from subsidies and those in the south who tend to be small-scale farmers with limited resources. Mechanisms need to be developed to support the farmers in the south to protect biodiversity (protected fauna causes extensive damage to farmers' plantations) and to promote improved farming methods and sustainable forest management. Persistent humanwildlife conflict was noted as threatening food security as well as the lives of farmers with 8 deaths recorded in 2020, 15 accidents and 8,300 complaints. Furthermore, it was noted that the emigration of youth to urban areas is likely to continue, should a solution not be found. It was concluded that support from international bodies is needed in the implementation of ecoresponsible agriculture.Dialogues in the DRC highlighted the need to:• Guarantee access for all to healthy, affordable and nutritious food;• Switch to sustainable consumption patterns;• Stimulate production that respects nature;• Promote equitable livelihoods; and• Build resilience to vulnerabilities, shocks and stress.Land tenure was noted as a major barrier to sustainable agricultural production in the DRC.In Equatorial Guinea, the need for improved equity in rural transport was highlighted, as rural populations are economically excluded by food distribution barriers.In CAR, stakeholders indicated that smallholder farmers are responsible for the majority of food production but face multiple agricultural challenges such as a lack of access to good quality inputs (such as seeds, fertilisers, pesticides and supervision) and reliable machinery. It was mentioned that the resilience of vulnerable communities can be strengthened through the development of sustainable value chains and the establishment of food safety nets.In Equatorial Guinea's Dialogues, it was indicated that food handling in supply chains is poor and the control of food quality in public markets and grocery stores is inadequate.In the Central region, key areas for improving health and nutrition included nutritionsensitive agriculture, reducing the prices of nutritious foods, awareness campaigns on nutrition and indigenous foods, improved dietary guidelines and food safety standards. In the CAR Dialogues, it was mentioned that there is a need for the development of nutrition-sensitive agriculture with the ambition of reducing chronic malnutrition by at least 10% in three years.The Dialogues in Equatorial Guinea found that healthy and nutritious food is too expensive thereby limiting the population's access to it. Consequently, obesity, anaemia and child malnutrition have risen, and the country has promoted the production and consumption of healthy, safe and nutritious food.Nutritional awareness programmes and the promotion of healthier diets using the media and food guides were deemed necessary by Gabon. Stakeholders described an absence of food-based dietary guidelines and a lack of nutritional standards. Furthermore, the need for a return to the consumption of healthy indigenous foods was recognised.primary forests and other terrestrial and aquatic protected areas. The Dialogues in Gabon also highlighted the need for an increased budget for the Department of Agriculture so as to be able to respect the Maputo and Malabo agreements. Other action areas included the need to implement nutrition policies, strengthen collaboration between the Health Department and other sectors that deal with health issues, and to reform the legislative and regulatory framework to promote smallholders' access to land.Gabon identified the need for forestry companies to collaborate with the department responsible for infrastructure to maintain road networks essential for the flow of agricultural produce.In Equatorial Guinea and Gabon, stakeholders noted the need for State-funded research to improve agricultural production. Additionally, in Equatorial Guinea, it was recognised that all subsectors (e.g. crops, livestock, fisheries and forestry) need technical assistance in production, diagnosis of problems, coordination and financing for research.In the CAR Dialogues, customary law on land access proved a contentious issue as it does not allow equity in access to land nor the sustainable exploitation of non-timber forest products. Furthermore, current agricultural systems, concentrated around villages with limited resources, were noted as not being conducive to the establishment of large farms, which would likely create tension over land.In Equatorial Guinea, importance was placed on updating national legislation related to the food system and its sustainability. The livestock sector indicated a need to build a feed factory. This led to discussions on who should establish the factory, the Government or the private sector. Additionally, producers highlighted the need for better coordination between financial institutions and the competent ministerial departments to improve the selection of beneficiaries to financial facilities.In CAR, a support strategy has been established for small-scale producers which includes improved access to financing and Equatorial Guinea has entered high-level dialogue to work towards the Maputo agreement of investing 10% of resources in the agricultural sector.In Gabon, the Dialogues highlighted the need for mechanisms to mobilise funds for producers. It was deemed essential to set up an investment fund to support agricultural activities. It was noted that professionals from the agricultural sector are prepared to contribute to its establishment through voluntary financial contributions which will be supplemented by the State. Furthermore, it was suggested that banking institutions hire agricultural specialists to better assess the demands for related financing.Image: ©Juan Pablo Marin García (Alianza de Bioversity International / CIAT)AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review process • 43 42 • AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review process interest more young people. The State also needs to improve basic social services such as hospitals, schools, recreation centres and internet connectivity in rural areas.In Cameroon, an impact study was conducted on the socio-economic effects of COVID-19 on livelihood strategies undertaken by the rural poor and the adaptation of the agricultural sector as a whole. Consultation was inclusive with participation by the Regional Platform of Farmers' Organisations of Central Africa, youth, women, people with disabilities and other vulnerable groups. The consultation was facilitated by the Climate Smart Agriculture Youth Network Global.In CAR, a common vision for 2030 was identified through the involvement of different food system stakeholders, government, technical and financial partners, civil society, farmers' organisations as well as the national scientific community. The Government, through the Ministry of Agriculture, is to strengthen its leadership and coordinate actions.Stakeholders mentioned that Gabon is implementing a policy that reconciles agricultural production with environmental conservation. The National Land Use Plan is to provide a key instrument for the preservation ofIn Equatorial Guinea, special mention was made of the need for technical assistance by fisheries, particularly in the areas of:• Traditional boat repairs;• Safety and survival equipment at sea, such as radar;• Engine spare parts; and• Facilities for the conservation, handling and sale of fresh fish. As such, the momentum created by the UN Food System Summit is therefore an opportunity to substantially improve on and accelerate the pace of implementation of the CAADP/Malabo Agenda. The BR and AATS may be supplemented with additional indicators (e.g., processing and distribution as key segment in the food system) to better inform a more comprehensive planning, implementation, and tracking of transforming Africa's food systems. The aim of the report is to present individual Member States and collective performances in order to trigger continental, regional and national level action programmes to drive agricultural transformation in Africa.The report also helps to create more appetite for individual entities to strengthen national and regional institutional capacity for agriculture data collection and knowledge management to inform actions. Building on this principle, it is anticipated that this would support improved evidence-based planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation, mutual learning and foster alignment, harmonization and coordination among multi-sectoral and multistakeholder efforts. Such efforts include the CAADP Malabo Policy Learning Event, the Permanent Secretaries' Retreat, engagements led by Regional Economic Communities (RECs), and platforms organized by partners.The report highlights the inclusive nature of the process and methodological approach that was used to collect and analyse data and write the report. Furthermore, the report also presents the key findings at continental and regional levels, the detailed profiles and scorecards of individual Member States, and sets of recommendations for individual Member States, regional bodies and continental institutions.The report is complemented by an online CAADP BR Communication Toolkit, used as a smart and powerful online interactive tool that presents the BR data in various forms, making it more easily accessible to users. The tool was developed by AU and its partners in close consultation with RECs, technical experts and other stakeholders as an accompanying output of the BR Report to facilitate the dissemination of its findings. The tool is designed to make it easier for policymakers and other stakeholders at national and regional level to interact with the data and information provided. The Toolkit contains clear graphics, analyses and maps that facilitate easier access to the information.Rwanda is ontrack to meet the goals and targets of Malabo by 2025, nineteen (19) countries are classified as progressive. With an overall score of 4.32, the continent is not-on-track to meeting the Malabo goals and targets by 2025. Regarding financing, the report shows that only four (4) countries invested at least 10% of their national expenditure on agriculture. Only one country is on track to meeting the vgoal by 2025. Both empirical observations and research findings presented in the report, show that the COVID-19 pandemic and its impacts on agriculture and food security on the continent, could partly explain this low performance of the continent.For every reporting Member State, performance against the set targets is presented in the form of a \"Country Scorecard in implementing the Malabo Commitments\".For the first time, the report includes a section on the implementation of AU decisions, thematic in nature, and specific to agricultural transformation in Africa, on: Seed and Biotechnology; Livestock Development; Fisheries and Aquaculture; Irrigation; Mechanization; Fertilizer Use; Sanitary and Phytosanitary Capacities, Land Policy; and Ecological Organic Agriculture. This reporting period covers progress made by Member States in the implementation of the Malabo declaration for the period 2015 to 2020.As reflected in the key findings, the report presents the seven (7) thematic areas of performance, aligned with the commitments in the Malabo Declaration. It also evaluates country performance in achieving the goals and targets, which have been disaggregated into twenty-three (23) performance categories, and further divided into forty-six (46) indicators.In the Third BR Report, countries are considered 'on-track' if their total score is equal to or higher than the benchmark of 7.28; or 'progressive' when their score is equal to or more than 5 but less than 7.28; or 'not-on-track' if their score is less than 5.A total of fifty-one (51) AU Member States reported in this 3rd cycle of the Biennial Review process, up from the 49 Member States that reported in the 2nd Biennial Review cycle, and 43 in the inaugural Biennial Review cycle. Out of the 51 Member States that reported, 25 Member States registered increased scores between 2019 and 2021 review cycles. This reflects the commitment by Member States to the CAADP BR process and their efforts to address the shortfalls revealed in the inaugural and 2nd BR reports.AICCRA Key insights and perspectives from the Food Systems Summit Dialogues and the CAADP 3rd Biennial review process • 53Image Top: ©Annie Spratt (Unsplash)• Member States, regional economic communities and AU should mount a strong communication and dissemination campaign on the findings in the report.The use of the CAADP biennial review communication toolkit and the biennial review dashboard should be encouraged among different stakeholders to view, observe and reflect on the findings in the report.• Member States, working in collaboration with all stakeholders, should ensure that national dialogues are convened to reflect on and discuss the results of this report to prioritize and develop policy and programmatic responses to speed up the implementation of the Malabo Declaration.RECs, Member States and development partners should be guided by the findings of this report to ensure alignment to the CAADP agenda.• Strengthen mutual accountability systems to include accountability for actions and results by a broader range of players, including the private sector, farmer organizations, civil society organizations, and development partners.• Member States should use the CAADP biennial review mechanism to report on progress in the implementation of the pathways for food systems transformation in the Africa Common Position to the UN Food System and national dialogues report.• AU should undertake an external evaluation/audit of the overall biennial review process to establish the efficacy of the self-reporting system and to suggest measures to strengthen the quality and robustness of the process at national, regional and continental levels.• Stronger political leadership and commitment is required in order for government to mobilize stakeholder buyin for financing and implementation of key recommendations. A central multi-sectoral coordination mechanism is required for effective CAADP implementation.• Member States are urged to design, fund and implement carefully selected priority programs and projects to fast-track the achievement of the seven Malabo Commitments. In this regard, Member States should intensify efforts to develop and implement Malabocompliant high-quality NAIP.• Strengthen the capacity of regional economic communities, given the critical role they play in mobilizing member state in the biennial review process, by providing them with more human and financial resources.• Member States are encouraged to integrate the CAADP biennial review data collection process into existing national monitoring and reporting systems, including the joint sector review processes.• AU and Member States need to develop and strengthen implementable mechanisms for peer learning. Well-structured peerto-peer learning and exchange should be an integral part of the CAADP process.• From the experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic, Member States should establish stronger emergency response plans and commit to building more resilient food systems to respond better to future shocks.The 2021 biennial review report calls for action to transform Africa's agriculture","tokenCount":"13993"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0302633624.json b/data/part_2/0302633624.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..860ac19e6def1719543c88a083bbdbc9c158563b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0302633624.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b7cdcb0a99670f864688cae999c03abb","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/1b86e342-f554-403f-b60c-92ea892121fe/retrieve","id":"-1209337161"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"2b4ea271-5218-4fed-9e65-f88abfb6bf32","pagecount":"22","content":"This 3-day workshop convened nearly 50 representatives from Climate-Smart Village related Flagship projects across Latin America, Africa, Asia and South Asia to share experiences and foster learning and exchange in order to:1. Define a common vision of what CSVs are, their purpose to CCAFS and its partners, and direction moving forwards 2. Reflect on lessons learnt from different CCAFS regions and identify a set of best practices going forwards 3. Identify opportunities for harmonization of methodologies to enable cross regional analyses and global learning, and 4. Respond to emerging CCAFS external evaluation recommendations on CSVs and incorporate adjustments into Flagship projects during Extension and Phase 2Plenary and fruitful group discussions, combined with field visits to the Haryana CSVs enabled deep reflections and the collective building of a common vision on the objectives, key elements and generic theory of change of CSVs.Various success stories of CSVs were highlighted including the development of climate-smart integrated portfolios based on holistic approaches, participatory action research and empowerment. CSVs were seen as particularly important models for articulation and partnerships between a variety of actors and institutions at all levels. Nevertheless, it was noted that certain areas had potential for improvement and this included concerns over the viability of sustainability beyond the project cycle, a lack of evidence of climate-smartness beyond productivity, a need to balance technology and socioeconomic aspects, the need to better acknowledge indigenous knowledge, a lack of involvement of 'poor' farmers and youth, and more research, engagement and documentation needed to facilitate scaling out.There was general agreement on the farmer-driven nature of the CSVs processes and convergence on a minimal set of criteria for the participatory approach to be considered while acknowledging that the levels of participation must be context-specific, reflecting local realities. The criteria included the focus on evidence building, integration of knowledge to actionable science, understanding farmer priorities and institutional landscapes, promotion of empowerment and ownership through effective multi-stakeholders partnerships to support scalability and sustainability through integration in the agricultural system.Discussions on the CSV Theory of Change reflected some initial confusion by the participants around the CSV replications (e.g 500 CSVs in Haryana) and the scaling up component, but finally a common understanding was reached. Put in simple words, CSV Theory of Change is based on generating solid evidence with farmers, on the effectiveness of integrated CSA portfolios (incl. climate smart technologies and practices, business models and associated supporting services and resource leveraging mechanisms). This is in addition to working with partners, governments and private sector on developing implementing pathways to scale it up (e.g. integration into gov. and local planning documents) in order to reach farmers that are not in CSVs (Haryana's 500 CSVs are villages who are adopting climate-smart technologies and practices that come from learning within CSVs).It was also pointed out that: i) -We have a common CSV model among the different regions made of a set of replicable processes aiming to build solid evidence that leads to enable wide adoption but where implementation and scaling up of this evidence are context-specific, ii) In order for CSVs to be scalable, a simpler model is required to piggyback on existing large scale initiatives and iii) CSV Theory of Change should be a combination of the two complementary bottom-up and top-down, science led approaches.When discussing the issue of CSV scale and research units, it became clear once again that one size does not fit all, with CSVs being defined at different levels in different regions. (E.g. in SA villages defined by administrative boundaries. In SEA: landscape, (micro) watershed level; LAM: territorial/ catchment level approach based on production system). However, in general, it was agreed that the CSV scale should be a manageable unit with similar conditions based on biophysical, socio-economicpolitical context and dependent on CSA technologies being tested and research questions addressed.The need to further develop and strengthen the CSV Research framework was also highlighted with useful discussions around three proposed thematic building blocks: The creation of more systematic and targeted science-led evidence at the relevant scale (landscape, value-chain) and for the different stakeholders, specifically some topics where evidence is particularly weak including addressing longer term climate variability and change, avoiding maladaptation, defining CSA versus Sustainable Intensification, layering of technologies vs individual options.  Development of a methodological transferability framework based on processes (not contextspecific) where its \"ingredients\" or components are transferable but bring the context specificity; incl. establishing appropriate metrics, adaptation domains (incl. more work on farmer typologies and CBA); using biophysical and socio-economic Analogues; building more on big data analysis (capitalizing baseline data) and learning from dis adoption.  Developing relevant business models as vehicles for scaling up/out (CCAFS role: informing vs developing?).Opportunities for methodological harmonization were also identified and included among others:  For the Agronomic trials: The need to establish a minimum common framework to enable comparable set up of several scenario trials  For GHE emissions: Develop guidelines and protocols on the different methods available (incl. landscape level); address how to validate the mathematical models; agree on relevant measurement scale (plot emissions, life cycle or full footprints?)  For Business models: indicators to assess climate-smartness of a business model,  For Scaling out: to develop a framework to integrate CSA into local planning  For Gender: the need for a general assessment on what has been done and what have been the different results across the regions; strategies to enhance women's decision making in the hh; to address how can CSVs be a factor that influences youth staying in rural areas.This first CSV workshop was a real success and allowed the CSV community to make major progress on the collective development of the CVS.II Vision to be reflected in the full CCAFS Phase II proposal. Co-develop a 3-page Synthesis of CSV concept, TOC and objectives, to be shared for comments by October.  Develop the CSV research framework and share  Establish CSV practitioners (email list); Interest in group on business development and regional learnings  Bring other flagships into this CSVs discussions and future actions (mitigation and climate information components have big roles to play) to further catalyze synergies  Consider Writing Workshops to harmonize methodologies (of what is context specific) and clearly identify and strengthen the science  Synthesis paper ideas: Framework for Agricultural Trials, mainstreaming CSA into planning/LAPAs  Carry out a second CSV workshop towards the end of 2016 before Phase II (highlighting the science and including poster sessions) (Yen Tan Bui) This presentation by the coordinator of the CSV villages in SEA addressed: the selection of CSVs, the climate-smart components present in each of them, and introduced the aspect of the relevant scale to be addressed, including the landscape level. The implementation structure from national to community level was also presented: the identification activities of the baseline work, initial capacity building, land use planning, and priority interventions carried out based on a bottom-up and participatory approach. Also mentioned were upcoming activities related to capacity building of CSV teams, household-based land-use optimization and opening of CSV research proposals.The presentation addressed the risk profiles of the EA CSV villages, the regional vision and impact pathway ending with a focus on the Nyando Case documented in the CCAFS info note. Andy Jarvis invited the participants to address and discuss, in group tables, the following aspects related to the scaling up and out of strategies behind the CSV approach:  CSV Theory of Change should be a combination of the two proposed models: the more local/ bottom up, as well as the higher intensity, \"top down\" or science led setting.  No one size fits all. CSV Theory of Change needs to be embedded in the local/regional context and could build on context specific ecological and socio-economic typologies.- The morning of day three was devoted to continuing the CSV science session. Three major topics were address through short opening presentations followed by group discussions. Key aspects are summarized below.CSVs are founded upon an action research framework whereby communities are an integral actor in the research process. Different participatory approaches with local institutions and farmers themselves have been implemented across the different regions. Are we observing regional differences on its implementations (e.g. farmers as implementers vs farmers as drivers of the agenda or hybrid process)? To open up the discussion, an introduction on What is PAR and its key principles was made by John Recha:Participatory action research is an outcome-driven approach to research in communities that emphasizes farmer participation and action. PAR seeks to understand the community by trying to change it, collaboratively and following reflection. It emphasizes collective inquiry and experimentation grounded in experience and social history. Key principles include: Recognizing community as a unit of identity  Building on strengths and resources within the community  Facilitating collaborative partnerships in all phases of the research  Integrating knowledge and action for mutual benefit of all partners  Promoting a co-learning and empowering process that attends to social inequalities  Continuous monitoring and involving a cyclical and iterative process  Disseminating findings & knowledge gained to all partners  Scaling up through local policy makerso Are there success stories that might help us to identify which might be the best PAR practices? o Do we need different strategies for PAR or are we on the right track? o Which might be the minimum requirements for a PAR approach?Building on the collective discussion the following principles and requirements came out (in blue, novel elements compared to the initial definition are highlighted).PAR is a tool to generate scalable, cost-effective and socially relevant CSV models for different agroecologies. The out scaling of the CSV model does not necessarily require PAR. PAR in CSVs needs to be an Eye Opener allowing to create awareness and showcase available technologies and tools1. -Site selection: should be region specific/representative and scalable -Conduct situation analysis /baseline and vulnerability Assessment -Identify climate risks, incentives and benefits of participation in CSVs -Fosters initial community mobilization to build common understanding of the vision and goals-Essential need to understand the specific history of the community rather than assuming that we are starting from a blank page. -Recognizing that a project might have a limited scope, and will only contribute to addressing some aspects/needs of the community. -Need to make some distinction about Participatory Action Research (might develop some model and protocols on which participatory action in needed) and Participatory Action.Appropriate CSV Scale  Not easy to define concrete concept of CSV research unit. Current diversity observed on scales across regions. (E.g. in SA villages defined by administrative boundaries. In SEA: landscape, (micro) watershed level; LAM: territorial/ catchment level approach based on production system)  One size does not fit all.  CSV scale should be a manageable unit with similar conditions, context specific, considering:- -Do we know which the best PAR practices are (things that will really make a difference to help us achieving out outcomes)? -Now that CCAFS is reaching its first 5 years, should we think about evaluating the PAR work already done in the different sites and assess how far have we have got so far? -At which level is PAR being used: CCAFS level, project level?-After having collectively reflected and established the PAR minimum requirements the questions that arise are: Are we meeting all those PAR minimum requirements? Should we try and use a similar \"set level\" of participation across all the regions or should it be grounded in the cultural and institutional realities of each site? Should PAR be taken as \"one size fit all \"approach in its implementation? Collective agreement was reached on the fact that in the case of PAR's implementation in the CSVs, one size does not fit all and the levels of participation must be context-specific depending on the regional/local realities.Village is in the name, but this may not always be the most appropriate scale for a CSV. In Asia and Latin America, perhaps landscapes or catchments are more appropriate. The issue of scale of a CSV has been brought up by the external evaluation. In this discussion, the group reflected on which might be the appropriate scale, and tried to clarify the CCAFS strategy across and within regions.In its opening presentation Julian Gonsalves recalled, in a great and very illustrative way (See Video), the CSV purpose, focus, principles and scale, opening the floor to the 1. To create science-led evidence on the efficiency of the model (at the relevant scale: landscape, value-chain etc.).  Are we properly addressing climate change (longer term) and climate variability? Or are we addressing climatic risk?  Need of more scientific analyses to evaluate that what we are promoting today will not lead to maladaptation.  How to make better use of climate information services? Some sort of distinction needs to be made between sustainable intensification and climate-smart agriculture. Need to be more specific on what is and what is not CSA 2. Define adaptation domains to facilitate transferability of successful research 3. Identify and develop the business models that are needed. Our outcome-driven approach leads us towards impact and applicability. After several years of research and evidence building, we now need to reflect on the most appropriate scaling model e.g. for engaging the government and for industry.Are we building evidence appropriately?Most of the discussion groups (4 out of the 6 tables) concluded that CCAFS is currently NOT doing enough to build evidence base and that opportunity for improvement exists and focuses around:  Targeted evidence: defining the targeted stakeholders (farmers, investors, policy makers), the different types of evidence needed and how it needs to be framed and communicated.  More systematic evidence base processes (establishing clear trade-offs between the research and the scaling out goals), and consider specifically some topics where evidence is particularly weak.  Strengthening innovative aspects of research: focus evidence base on portfolios and layering of technologies (not occurring everywhere so far) vs traditional individual technologies evaluation.  Establishing CSA metrics for M&E and enabling more breakdown of evidence around the three pillars.  Addressing future climate variability and risk (incl. appropriateness of current coping mechanisms from farmers for future CC conditions).  Building more on big data analysis opportunities (capitalize baseline data).  Learning from dis adoption of technologies and fast spreading technologies (i.g cell phones).  Agenda guidance: can weather and climate information services be used to drive the CCAFS research agenda?Adaptation domains: Are we understanding transferability?The group agreed overall that so far CCAFS has not adequately addressed transferability within its projects (no evidence) and shared the need to further address and understand both current and future adaptation domains and ensure future sustainability of CSA technologies and options despite context specificity associated to technology adoption. In terms of available tools, the Climate Analogue was recognized as being of key importance if embracing the socio-economic and soil aspects. Suggestions on aspects to be further considered include: Development of a methodological transferability framework based on processes (not context specific) where its \"ingredients\" or components are transferable but bring the context specificity.  Carrying out more work on farmers typologies and CBA (costs associated to implementation of CSA)o Are we building evidence appropriately to address climate variability and future climate change? (Method) o Adaptation domains: Are we understanding transferability? (Tool) o Business models: What is the research process and how do we mainstream it in the thinking of a region?This discussion led to the following key reflections:o CSV concept is a process/approach, thus need for BM that are different than for products. o BMs for CSVs should be market driven but need to be dynamic. o Need to identify target specific investors (e.g. private enterprises, gov, cooperatives, and self-help groups) and define processes that promote investments at CVS level accordingly. o Need to engage and involve those \"clients\".o Lack of clarity was expressed on the research behind BMs for CSVs and who the customers of this research are. Call for more work. o Questioned role of CCAFS researchers/policy makers (partners) on trying to develop BM by themselves. o CCAFS science role should be informing investors and entrepreneurs on potential business opportunity, providing them the necessary inputs (e.g. evidence for cost recovery, microcredit etc.) o Research process might include documentation of BM benefits (M&E)o Need for business case for capacity building for famers, in collaboration with private sector. o Existing CCAFS SEA platform to enable different groups to come together and develop BMsRajbir Singh's presentation (Video) focused on sharing learning from the Indian and ATARI experience at the CSVs. See highlights in ANNEX 3.In its opening presentation Surabi Mittal (CIMMYT) recalled the current key challenges:• Majority of farmers are small and bounded by limited subset of knowledge and access to resources • Male farmers are moving for secondary income leading to increasing feminization of agriculture • Youth moving out of agriculture • Gender gap-literacy, limited access to assets, and cultural barriers and traditional mind set-\"Women don't need information\" • The problem of lack of information is even more pertinent among women engaged directly or indirectly in agriculture • Limited experience/ confidence in decision makingCSV research has strong focus on technologies, innovative platform and partners, and how foster uptake, adoption, scale-out and impact of those technologies. However, the key catalyst in between is behavioral change.Examples from India:-What the existing gender gap is (survey analysis 2012 reflected poor access to assets but also to information and knowledge, where ICT can act) -Enhancing the role of gender in hh decision making to adopt CSAPs (reducing information asymmetry and empowering them; making women in hh accountable for record keeping) -Enhancing understanding by training (green seeker, inclusiveness in ICT services, weather info, creation of service windows) -Gender empowerment index Gender should be incorporated in activities where possible but is difficult to understand (and in some locations even more challenging)  What role do women play in agriculture and related activities? Do we know this? Should this be the starting point? Do we have data and information on this?  Technologies, especially mechanization, might displace labor-the first loss might be to female labor-how this will be accounted for? (Gender neutral? Same impact on men and women?)  Men and women think differently, might internalize information and implement it differently-so should we have a disintegrated (only women) vs integrated (men and women) approach?  What is the role of gender in the decision making process?  What is the incentive for women to be part of CSVs?  Is it necessary for CSVs to be concerned with gender issues?Questions for discussion and reporting by discussion facilitation Sophia Huyer  Should CSVs be concerned with gender issues?  Are we doing enough in CSVs to examine gender and youth elements of climate adaptation and mitigation? -Do you know of existing tools for gender main streaming/ integration-Are these tools simple to understand and implement? -Do CSVs need a different approach from pre-existing gender approaches?  How can we enhance the role of gender in household decision making to adopt CSAPs?-What are the regional lessons learned? Can you list at least one? -Are we collecting and analyzing the data to truly understand gender and youth differentiated impacts of CSA options? -How are you addressing gender and youth in technology adoption assessments? Consensus on the need to address gender and youth issues in CSVs  Emerging approaches in the region on the role of gender and technologies assessment  Different tools exist and are used, but need for a general assessment on what has been done and what have been the different results across the regions.  Need for strategies to enhance women's decision making in the hh (Assessment of technologies and tools introduced and their impact on women's position in the hh, their control and access to resources (been done in Nepal; Women involved in book keeping in India)  Need to address: How can CSVs be a factor that influences youth staying in rural areas (financial instruments, loans, incentives, use of technologies, training on business opportunities around farming; providing interesting jobs around CSV activities-data recording etc.)ii. Scaling-out approaches: linking with LAPA or sub-regional planning: Experiences from South Asia, primarily IndiaThe opening presentation by Jeetendra P. Aryal highlighted to following aspects:-India is very special because it has NAPCC (National Action Plan on CC) and SAPCC (State Action Plan on CC) and good integration between both levels. Missing GAP = Local Adaptation Plans of Action.-LAPA: Important vehicle to scale CSA (endorsed by the government in Nepal) -Need to explore how we can mainstream CSVs into LAPAs, enable coordination and synergies (both concepts acting at village level)o What are the most appropriate sub-national policies and plans that can provide incentives for scaling-out CSA? (experiences from Nepal, regional lessons learned) o How might local CSA programs be best designed to promote CSA adoption? o What is the role of local institutions in providing supporting services to farmers that increases CSA adoption levels and where do the opportunities lie?-The group discussed the need to reach impact at local level planning -In general, in most of the CSV sites, existence of national level frameworks (NAPAs) but gap at local level -Climate-smart alliances set up in rural Africa to be used as vehicles to integrate into national planning but, how is this going to be connected to the local plans? -Nepal: village plans including 50% of the budget on LAPAs -Incentives to integrate CSA into LAPAs? Where is the information feeding the LAPAs coming from? Can CSV research provide inputs to LAPAs? -Need to further discuss how to integrate CSA into local planningClare Stirling presented some of the key challenges to be discussed related to GHG emissions methodological issues in CSVs. What is the most appropriate GHG approaches to use in CSVs?  Do we replicate (FP3 detailed and expensive measurements) or do we take less expensive approaches (incl. calibration of models as way to scale out)? What is the trade-off: Gold standards models (DNDC, but apparently several problems been reported) vs data light model? Cool Farm tool?  Do we want a robust analysis of emissions or idea of which directions these technologies are going to take GHG?Questions for discussion and reporting o Are we using the best methods? -There are different groups using different measurements.-Methane measurement is easily done, but carbon sequestration is very difficult.-It is really not easy to tell if the methods being used now are the best ones.-Guidelines of different measurements should be developed.-A group from New Zealand has been doing measurements in cattle productions, paddy rice, and applying different predictive models for different location-specific measurements of emissions.o Are all measurements using SAMPLES best practice methods?Not a concrete answer for this Y/N question, just miscellaneous ideas:-GHG lab has been set up in Nairobi for different measurements.-Mono-cropping of rice in the Philippines: measure CH4 emissions in rice.-Using different mathematical models to predict GHG emissions. The question is, how do we validate these models? -Implementation of GHG emissions measurements at landscape scale. Follow-up design, data management and analysis. Participants on this discussion table addressed the following questions:o What are the minimal standard practices that need to be implemented across all CSVs? o What common protocols can be adopted across all CSV projects Key reflections shared by the group facilitator Samuel Partey were that given the important heterogeneity among the CSVs from the different regions (in terms of climatic risks and challenges, agro-ecologies and production systems etc.) it might be difficult to identify standard practices and rather the common elements should be:-Sharing a common objective -Having a comparable set up of several scenario trialsThe opening presentation by Anne Marie Groot \"Exploring opportunities to scale out CSA in CSV through innovative business models\" share the ongoing work developed under FP1 project \"Recommendation domains, incentives and institutions for equitable local adaptation planning at subnational level and scaling up climate smart agricultural practices in wheat and maize systems\"; as well as the concrete case study developed for the cooperative in Noorpur Bet (Punjab). Watch the Video, See ANNEX 4 for the highlightso Should CCAFS focus more on cooperatives to out-scale CSA practices and accelerate climate smart businesses? o Establishment/facilitation of innovation platforms: is there a role for CCAFS? o Should we identify a basic set of criteria for assessing climate smartness of business ideasbusiness cases?-Reduced price of inputs -Higher skills -Increased income The group also reflected on the question of whether CCAFS should be moving into the value chain/ market driven approach or if we should be more focused on the production of technologies. To be compared with CCAFS definition (as per in pre-proposal):  Integration of technologies, practices and services, examining how token technologies function in a broader ecosystem of approaches  Built on a participatory approach to understand adoption barriers, farmer acceptance  Wider lens of evaluation: going beyond productivity to also incorporate adaptation and mitigation  Building of evidence for scaling out, piggy-backing the opportunities that climate context adds to a traditional technology roll out approach (e.g. using climate finance, bundling with climate services among others)General closing comments from the plenary  Significant discussion about CSA but no one is really concrete about it. Some say: Is CSV the right approach? What else should we ask back? If not in this way how do we reach millions of Ha/ farmers? (Reiner)  This workshop has helped participants to realize how important the participatory research element is in the CSV approach (multi-stakeholders involvement not only farmers)  Importance of having and showing the evidence on the value addition for promoting and upscaling this model: having good business cases for CSVs (e.g. inspiration from the cooperative model)  Lots of progress made but wide range of opportunities identified for more coordination on specific topics/areas  On harmonization: Writing workshops would be very helpful to get to an harmonized methodology (harmonization of what is context specific)","tokenCount":"4290"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0333243827.json b/data/part_2/0333243827.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8d9bf73c7597c8ee35b3908bc77fe857aa5b28f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0333243827.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"29c325db513524b918b951014ec92757","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/434c5896-ff35-4b9a-902b-ef5565ed3afa/retrieve","id":"-895718532"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"52efab6a-ae8b-4539-a801-0c2cbbebdb4a","pagecount":"12","content":"The Sustainable Intensification of Mixed Farming Systems Initiative aims to provide equitable, transformative pathways for improved livelihoods of actors in mixed farming systems through sustainable intensification within target agroecologies and socio-economic settings.Through action research and development partnerships, the Initiative will improve smallholder farmers' resilience to weather-induced shocks, provide a more stable income and significant benefits in welfare, and enhance social justice and inclusion for 13 million people by 2030.Activities will be implemented in six focus countries globally representing diverse mixed farming systems as follows: Ghana (cereal-root crop mixed), Ethiopia (highland mixed), Malawi: (maize mixed), Bangladesh (rice mixed), Nepal (highland mixed), and Lao People's Democratic Republic (upland intensive mixed/ highland extensive mixed).Cereal Systems Initiative for South Asia-Mechanization and Extension Activity (CSISA-MEA) is supported by USAID/ Bangladesh and aims to support the mechanization of agriculture in Bangladesh by developing the capacity of the private sector to develop, manufacture, and market innovative new technology. This assistance will enable the country's farmers to mechanize their agricultural production to maintain national food security and avoid dependence on imports.More than half of the agricultural workforce in Bangladesh are women. Women farmers typically engage in activities around the homestead, such as homegardening, poultry, post-harvesting, and processing (BISWAS et al., 2022). However, social, and cultural norms disfavour their engagement in household decision-making and control over farm assets (Jennings et al., 2022). In this context, women's abilities to realize their full productive potentials, and to contribute to the wellbeing of their families are often severely limited. The Mixed Farming System Initiative aims at identifying and promoting innovations that contribute to reducing genderconstraining norms and to enhancing greater gender equality. One potential entry point to encourage increased gender equity in mixed farming systems in rural Bangladesh includes livestock production, which is traditionally under women's responsibility.At the household and farm level, livestock can support household nutrition and income in multiple ways. Meat, milk, and dairy supply calories and quality nutrition such that livestock ownership is associated with lover levels of stunting among children (Hossain & Khan, 2020). A significant share of household cash income comes from livestock (Thornton et al., 2009), mainly through the sale of livestock products. Livestock also acts as savings or economic reserves. Women's control over livestock may therefore enhance their empowerment across different domains in mixed farming systems. But livestock rearing also includes labour intensive tasks, such as manual feed preparation which can be a burden on women's workload.Mechanical fodder chopping, and feed preparation, are strategies to reduce drudgery and to improve feed use efficiency in livestock rearing. Improved fodder chopping technologies have been extensively piloted and scaled in the context of small-scale mixed farming systems. In Bangladesh, a great number and diversity of fodder chopping innovations have been developed and scaled throughout rural households and manufacturers/dealers. The use of fodder choppers is not only beneficial for individual farmers, but also for wider rural economies in Bangladesh. Fodder chopper is one of the technologies which has been widely researched under the USAID funded Cereal Systems Initiative for South Asia -Mechanization Extension Activity (CSISA-MEA) project. Through a collaboration between local manufacturers and the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI) more than 100 women and men have been trained on fodder chopper operation and how to utilize fodder chopper to run a machinery service business. Most of the research on fodder choppers focuses on chopper modification. For instance, the previous model's open blade presented a health concern. CSISA-MEA created the safe model in partnership with BARI, using a cover manufactured by a local manufacturer. Additionally, the promotion of fodder choppers has resulted in a significant increase in interest in the machines, with sales v nearly doubling in 2023 compared to 2021 (according to the USAID-funded CSISA-Mechanization and Extension Activity, implemented by International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre).CSISA-MEA is also collaborating with another USAID funded project in Bangladesh called Livestock Production for Improved Nutrition (LPIN) Activity, where the project is promoting fodder chopper among the large cattle farms. As a part of the collaboration CSISA-MEA is providing silage chopping training to the farmers.Due to its characteristics and intended use, fodder choppers have the potential to impact the lives of women farmers in rural Bangladesh. Through the reduction of workload, enhanced productivity, and the opportunity for financial independence by offering chopping services to their community, the technology can empower women to seize control of their lives and make valuable contributions to the local economy. However, despite the growing diffusion of fodder choppers in small-scale mixed farming systems in Bangladesh, and their potential benefits for women farmers, the gender equity and social inclusion implications of the use of fodder choppers has not been assessed in detail. This research protocol describes the design and data collection process of a study on the impacts of the introduction and use of mechanized fodder choppers on women farmers' agency, control over productive assets, and farm income in rural Bangladesh. In most smallholder livestock raising systems, fodder processing is done manually and falls within the responsibilities of women, adding significantly to their workload. The immediate outcome of the use of fodder choppers is a reduction in the time needed to prepare livestock feed (compared to manual feed preparation). However, related impacts on gender roles in livestock production and gender equity in mixed farming systems can be manifold. Error! Reference source not found. presents stylized pathways of some of these potential impacts. Accordingly, the use of fodder choppers may have both, positive and/or negative outcomes. It may enhance women's role in livestock raising through two main pathways: 1) by lowering women's workload and thereby promoting the expansion of their portfolio of activities, and 2) by increasing the productivity of livestock raising, and thereby increasing women's control over cash income and ultimately women's agency in household decision-making. Pathways that may be detrimental to women's roles in livestock raising include the crowding out of women (by men). This may happen if the adoption of fodder choppers is associated with men taking over control of livestock farming from women, a pattern that can be observed after the introduction of an innovation. For instance, Fischer and Qaim (2012) show that the promotion of collective action in Banana marketing in Kenya leads to increased male control in banana production, which is typically dominated by women.Whether the crowding out of women has positive or negative effects on gender equity depends on women's use of the time previously spend with manual fodder preparation. A significant reduction in women's engagement in livestock may cause women's loss of control over the households' livestock assets and livestock income. Mehraban et al. (2022) find that households' adoption of labour-saving crops (oil palm) is associated with women having less decision-making power in terms of farm management and income control in Indonesia. The aim of the study is the quantification of the effects of the use of fodder chopper on i) time allocation for fodder chopping activities of both women and men farmers, ii) gender roles in decision-making in livestock production, and iii) gender control over livestock-based household income. The study relies on a quasi-experimental design with observational quantitative data for the statistical analysis. Formally, the treatment effect is estimated as follows:Where \uD835\uDC4C is the respective outcome variable for household i in district j, and \uD835\uDC39\uD835\uDC36 is a dummy variable indicating whether the household uses fodder (\uD835\uDC39\uD835\uDC36 = 1) choppers or not (\uD835\uDC39\uD835\uDC36 = 0) . The vector \uD835\uDC4B \uD835\uDC56 includes \uD835\uDC5A control variables that also influence outcome variable, such as household demographics, farm characteristics, and contextual variables, including households' location. With randomized assignment of \uD835\uDC39\uD835\uDC36,the estimate of \uD835\uDEFD indicates average treatment effect (ATE). Since the use of fodder choppers is not randomly distributed among observations, the study will rely on statistical approaches from applied econometrics to account for missing counterfactual and observed confounders that may simultaneously influence the use of fodder choppers, and the respective outcome (self-selection bias) (Wooldridge, 2010).Table 1 shows the hypothesized direction of the association between the use of fodder choppers and the set of outcome variables. While we expect the use of fodder choppers to reduce the time required to manual feed preparation, expected associations between fodder chopper use and women's role in decision-making and control over income are mixed, and are expected to depend on the women's ability to use freed time to engage welfare and or wellbeing enhancing activities.Table 1. Hypothesized direction of associations between the use of fodder choppers and outcome variables.Hypothesized association between fodder chopper use and outcome 1. Time allocation for fodder chopping activities of both women and men farmers -2. Women's roles in decision-making in livestock production -/ + 3. Women's control over livestockbased household income.-/+The study relies on farm household data collected through a structured phone-based questionnaire. As the focus of the study is the assessment of the effects of the use of fodder choppers on gender roles in livestock raising, the questionnaire was addressed to both spouses individually and separately (if the household was headed by a married or co-residing adult couple). Table 2 summarizes the areas covered by the questionnaire.A team of enumerators was carefully trained in the content and application of the data collection tool during September 2023 in Dhaka. The team of enumerators was selected to include both male and female members. Considering the social context and cultural norms in Bangladesh, male enumerators conducted phone interviews only with male farmers, while female enumerators interviewed all female respondents. Data collection was implemented in October 2023.The sampling frame included 791 households from 40 districts in Bangladesh. A total of 997 individual interviews were conducted. These represent 551 households covering 36 districts as depicted in Error! Reference source not found.. For 446 households, data could be collected from both spouses (or partners). The final share of fodder chopper users and non-users was almost equally distributed among the sample. Addressed to Livestock endowments and management, i.e., number and turnover of small and large livestock, main purposes of livestock raising.Main responded only Fodder processing activities employed by the household, i.e., chopper use, ownership, and type, labor use and distribution for fodder processing and livestock management.Gender roles in livestock production related to management, decision-making, and control over income.Both genders within the household Individual, 30-minute interval time allocation of female and male adults in the household during the 24-hour period preceding the interview.Both genders within the household Socio-demographic household characteristics.Main responded onlyTable 3 gives an overview of the main household and farm characteristics of sampled farms. Our sample is almost equally divided between fodder chopper users and nonusers. Fodder chopper users tend to possess a larger number of both small and large livestock compared to non-users. Users of fodder choppers also have higher expenditures for livestock feed and tend to hold a larger area of land both around the homestead and on fields away from the homestead. The average time spend on fodder chopping is significantly lower for fodder chopper users. ","tokenCount":"1808"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0357806633.json b/data/part_2/0357806633.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..825936fb726ac5a04a7c7c75445b14aeef40ebbd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0357806633.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"2264ad9f50d0ef6bf6b9c050a651f3df","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/6d44cfc5-4ec8-4e2a-b148-ba6477b3d490/retrieve","id":"1342975776"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"9efcd0fe-cf3a-455c-b4cd-ca6e5f5259eb","pagecount":"30","content":"SAIRLA) Programme is a UK Department for International Development-funded initiative that seeks to generate evidence and design tools to enable governments, investors and other key actors to deliver more effective policies and investments in sustainable agricultural intensification that strengthen the capacity of poorer farmers', especially women and youth, to access and benefit from SAI in Burkina Faso,The NLA project contract was signed between WYG and ILRI in February 2017 with an agreement to implement the NLA strategy in Ethiopia till 31 December 2019. ILRI took the leads on implementing the NLA strategy with five staffs where by three members of the team are on consultancy bases and the remaining are staffs of ILRI and involved in other similar project. The team is responsible for delivering the five project milestones. Accordingly, the NLA facilitation team together with the research representatives held their initial meeting on 3th of March 2017 to introduce NLA facilitation team members and research project representatives, agree on NLA strategy and research project themes alignment, draft vision and mission statements and identify boundary partners, draft outcome challenges for each boundary partner groups and discus on NLA launching workshop process.One of the decisions made during the 3rd of March meeting was to hold NLA launching and outcome mapping workshop on 27th and 28th of March, 2017. Accordingly National Learning Alliance (NLA) facilitation team organized a two day workshop for the NLA launching and outcome mapping exercises. The workshop brought together a total of 27 participants from the NLA facilitation team, the four SAIRLA research project representatives, WYG and SAIRLA international learning alliance facilitator and boundary partners identified for the NLA.The workshop aimed at launching the NLA and conducting an outcome mapping exercise with boundary partners. The specific objectives of the workshop were the following:  Introduce the National Learning Alliance (NLA) strategy  Introduce the four SAIRLA projects in Ethiopia  Identify and group boundary partners and define outcome challenges, progress markers and collective actions for each boundary partners group  Jointly agree on the NLA structure, steering committee roles and responsibilities and appointing NLA steering committee membersAccordingly, the meeting agenda included opening and introductory remarks, presentations on SAIRLA program, experience sharing on Africa RISING, Panel Discussion on the four SAIRLA research projects, presentation on the NLA strategy, presentation on outcome mapping exercise and an outcome mapping exercise including validation of mission and vision statements and development of outcome challenges and progress markers as well as identification of collective actions required, including communication and capacity building requirements for boundary partners. Specifically, the processes followed during the workshop are elaborated below:Richard Lamboll from NRI/SAIRLA made a brief introduction of what SAIRLA is doing in the six intervention countries across Africa and welcomed the workshop participants. In her opening remark, Siboniso Moyo also welcomed the workshop participants and said that ILRI campus is an ideal venue for NLA launch as 11 CGIAR Centres that have a presence in Ethiopia other parts of Africa and globally are hosted in it. She further stated that finding solutions for complex problems such as how to deliver equitable sustainable agricultural intensification in Africa require innovative solutions. Finding such solutions, she stated, requires diverse stakeholders to engage and learn together with the ultimate aim of developing the collective commitment and capacity to turn ideas and plans into action. Hence the SAIRLA projects which are anchored on a National Alliance approach is an innovative approach against the business as usual way of doing research and development. She then declared the workshop officially opened.The SAIRLA research representatives introduced their projects using a panel discussion format. The panel discussion was facilitated by Simret Yasabu and Million Getnet. Each Participant was given five sets of questions to answer in 2-3 minutes each. The questions include, what are the main challenges that your project is aiming at addressing?, how is your project going to address these challenges? What are the expected practice and policy changes that your project is going to bring? Where are your project intervention areas and who are your partners and beneficiaries? How are you planning to engage your stakeholders at different levels? Participants were allowed to ask questions around the end of the session to which the panellists gave answers.The aim of this presentation was to introduce the NLA strategy, together with the draft governance strategy. Million Getnet made the presentation and facilitated establishment of thematic work groups. Thematic workgroups were established in line with the three SAIRLA thematic areas include Equity, Services and Trade-Offs. The four researches which will be conducted do not explicitly include Equity as their thematic focus, but the workshop participants insisted that equity should be included. The methodology used to identify thematic workgroups was by writing down the three thematic workgroups on a flip chart and requesting the participants to join one or more of the thematic groups depending on the mandate of their organization and their interest.The outcome mapping exercise stared in the afternoon of the first day. The processes started with a brief presentation of outcome mapping a monitoring and evaluation tool by M and E expert of the NLA facilitation team. The presentation was followed by validation of vision and mission statements. This was done using a buzz group methodology where by those who were seated on a same table were given 10 minutes to discuss the draft vision and mission statements and then proceed with a plenary discussion. The process then went into validation of the draft list of boundary partners. This was done by displaying the list of boundary partners with a projector and editing the list. In the second day of the workshop the outcome mapping exercise continued with a group work on development of outcome challenge for each boundary partner group. The participants were split into five boundary partner group namely Public Development Partners, National and international research partners, NGO's and civic associations, Media and Donors. Each group was given close to one hour to develop their outcome challenge and they present their findings using a flip chart presentation. The outcome challenges were then commented and amended. Then the groups proceed with identification of progress markers. The same approach was used for identification of progress markers as well, participants went on their boundary partners group and worked on their progress markers and presented their findings using flip charts. Finally the groups were asked to develop their collection action requirements together their communication and capacity building requirements.The NLA facilitation team presented the draft governance structure of the NLA including the suggestions on membership in the steering committee. The participants discussed and amended the membership. Then the discussion went on the way forward where by the importance of reaching out to higher level decision makers at the Ministry of Agriculture, the need to include private sectors representatives and the importance of regular attendance of NLA related events by all boundary partners identified were discussed. The steering committee includes; The NLA vision and mission statements and boundary and strategic partners drafted first by the NLA Facilitation Team members and the SAIRLA research project representatives during their first meeting on 3rd March, 2017 to get to know each other's roles and responsibilities and contributions to SAIRAL objectives. During the NLA Launching and Outcome Mapping Workshop the NLA members, by working in small discussion 'buzz' groups, have thoroughly reviewed and suggested improvement on the draft NLA vision statement, mission statement and boundary partners. The revision of the vision and mission statements, incorporating the suggestions and comments by the workshop participants, was undertaken by three workshop participants on voluntary basis, which was later presented for endorsement by the NLA members.The NLA vision and mission statements and boundary partners endorsed by the NLA members are presented below:Decision makers create enabling environment for development and implementation of SAI strategies that would strengthen the capacity of smallholder farmers especially women and youth. Smallholder farmers employ and benefit from sustainable agricultural intensification practices.In support of the vision statement, the NLA create a learning platform for decision makers, development partners and smallholder farmers that enables them to have access to evidences and engage with decision support tools on sustainable agricultural intensification that is equitable, sensitive to trade-offs management and improvise service provisions.The boundary partners are those individuals, groups, or organizations with whom the NLA program interacts directly and with whom the program can anticipate opportunities for influence. The draft list of NLA partners was developed by the NLA Facilitation Team and research projects representatives on 3 rd March, 2017. The list of NLA boundary partners was further enriched and endorsed by NLA members during the Launching and OM workshop (see Development is complex, but an essential element concerns how people relate to each other. Outcome Mapping (OM) is a participatory methodology for planning, monitoring and evaluation, which focuses upon people and organizations and their relationships. Outcome Mapping is concerned with the level where a project has direct influence. OM concentrates efforts on assessing changes in the knowledge, attitudes and practices of the people and organizations with whom the NLA project works. These changes are called 'outcomes'. OM recognizes that while a project or programme can influence the achievement of outcomes, it cannot control them, because the ultimate responsibility for change rests with the partners of the project (boundary partners), and other actors beyond them. Outcome mapping recognised the limits of a project's influence, and shape our planning, learning, and accountability functions around \"outcomes\". The \"challenge\" is for the NLA project to help bring about these changes. The Outcome challenge describes how the behaviour, relationships, activities, or actions of an individual, group, or institution will change if the NLA project is extremely successful. Ideally, the outcome challenges describe how will the boundary partner be behaving or acting differently, and what new relationships will have been formed or the existing ones change in order to contribute to the NLA vision.The outcome challenge of each NLA boundary partner group was developed by respective members in each boundary partner group during the NLA Launch and Outcome Mapping Workshop (March27-28, 2017). All groups has assessed first their key functions /roles within the SAI agenda and their baseline condition. This information was then used to develop their outcome challenges (see Table 2).The boundary partner groups, based on their respective outcome challenges, have elaborated a set indicators of changed behaviours or milestones describing progression towards the outcome challenges known as 'Progress Markers' (see Table 2). This is centred on two key ideas: 1) that change occurs mainly through a series of small, incremental steps; and 2) that sustainable change comes about as a result of changes in people's behaviours, not just what they produce.Finally major collective actions required to be undertaken by each of boundary partner in order to contribute and influence the desired behavioural changes. This indicate the boundary partners are the first to effect and embrace changes by doing purposeful actions (see Table 2).There are three types of sustainable behaviour change. These are behaviours we would:  expect to see -key actors demonstrate early positive responses and initial engagement with the idea of change or the issue;  like to see -key actors are showing signs that the messages are being taken on board and are proactively changing the way things are done;  love to see -key actors display deep transformations in behaviour that demonstrate that the idea of change has been deeply internalised and will be sustainable in the long term. In a post NLA meeting held by the NLA facilitation team, the following activities are identified as things to be done between now and September. Abate Taye IDE a.taye@ideglogal.org 2.Abayneh Derero EEFRI abynehdd2009@gmail.com 3.Arega Gashaw ARARI-SARC argonlacomolza@gmail.com 4.Ashebir Wondimu MEFCC ashebirsa@gmail.com 5.4.1.1.1 Fadda Carlo Bioversity International c.fadda@cgiar.org 6.Fisseha Teshome MoANR Fishodagem@gmail.com 7.Getamessay Demeke Inter Aid France Getu.demeke@interaide.org 8.Reg. of NR/HARC Gettaye3@yahoo.com 9.4 4.1.1.7 Zoltan Tiba OPM Zoltan.tiba@opml.co.uk project will be anchored on a National Alliance approach that you will hear more about in these two days.","tokenCount":"1988"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0404857930.json b/data/part_2/0404857930.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e44bd81cd790a71b3041e719a4916818c9e9e3d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0404857930.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7d4121a3ac2be2e6415418b3b1dd5f6a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/19327d8a-cdf9-4c05-b9d4-13943db7552b/retrieve","id":"-1957103594"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"ecd704d2-0e4c-4298-a641-a8b3e7981646","pagecount":"3","content":"PART 1: Description and all information of the outcome/impact reported OUTCOME STORY/IMPACT STATEMENT Thanks to AICCRA capacity building on Next Generation (NextGen) seasonal climate forecast systems, the AGRHYMET Regional Climate Centre for West Africa and the Sahel has adopted an objective, traceable, and reproducible seasonal forecasting procedure that enables the generation of improved seasonal forecasts. The NextGen approach is fully operational at AGRHYMET, and NextGen forecasting products are being used to upgrade the AGRHYMET climate information portal. AGRHYMET has also transferred the newly acquired technical capacities to 173 participants from 17 National Meteorological and Hydrological Services in West Africa and the Sahel, enabling them to generate timely and decision-relevant climate information for agricultural sectors in West Africa.AGRHYMET Regional Climate Centre for West Africa and the SahelAICCRA Next Generation (NextGen) seasonal climate forecast systems, and capacity development and engagement have enabled the downscaling/transfer of new capacities from the AGRHYMET Regional Climate Centre to National Meteorological and Hydrological Services (NMHSs) [1][2]. NextGen is a seasonal climate forecasting system that enables the development and dissemination of objective forecasts by combining the best dynamic models, and automates the generation and verification of objective, probabilistic, statistically-calibrated, multimodel predictions of a range of climate or impact variables [1].A key statutory function of AGRHYMET as a Regional Climate Center is to develop seasonal forecasts and organize the Regional Climate Outlook Forum (RCOF). Currently, the West Africa RCOF uses a consensusbased forecasting procedure. However, this consensual approach is subjective, in the sense that it is not easily traceable and reproducible. In addition, it does not enable the fulfillment of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) recommendation that seasonal forecast procedures be objective, traceable, and reproducible [3]. The collaborative partnership with AICCRA has offered AGRHYMET a unique opportunity to strengthen its technical capacities to implement NextGen seasonal climate forecasting systems and improve the products available on its climate portal. NextGen is a seasonal climate forecasting system that enables the development and dissemination of objective forecasts by combining the best dynamic models, and automates the generation and verification of objective, probabilistic, statistically-calibrated, multi-model predictions of a range of climate or impact variables [1]. AICCRA supported and embedded AGRHYMET capacity through a series of regional and continental capacity strengthening efforts [4][5][6]. These efforts have enabled AGRHYMET to develop a new approach for seasonal climate forecasting that is tailored to West Africa regional needs [3,7]. NextGen is fully operational at AGRHYMET and NextGen products are being used to enhance the AGRHYMET climate information portal [8].A key challenge frequently mentioned by NMHSs that limits operationalizing the NextGen approach is the lack of consideration of hydrologic parameters in the PyCPT tool, one of the tools to operationalize the NextGen approach [9]. To address this challenge, AGHRYMET has adapted the PyCPT tool for hydrological forecasting [7]. In addition, AGRHYMET now has the full technical capacity to independently train NMHSs. To date, 173 participants from 17 National Meteorological and Hydrological Services (including non-AICCRA countries) have been trained [10][11]. Some NMHSs have operationalized the NextGen approach to generate seasonal climate forecasts [9]. Overall, AICCRA engagement and capacity development on state-of-the-art forecasting systems are enabling regional and national meteorological agencies to generate timely and decision-relevant climate information for agricultural sectors.Gender relevance: 1 -Significant. About 18% (31 out of 173) of the NextGen training participants were women. [4,5,10,11] Cap Dev relevance: 2 -Principal. Through AICCRA training, AGRHYMET is now equipped to provide enhanced climate information services to West African stakeholders. AGRHYMET has also trained 17 National Meteorological and Hydrological Services (NMHSs) (including both AICCRA and non-AICCRA countries for spillover effect). Equip 500 million small-scale producers to be more resilient to climate shocks, with climate adaptation solutions available through national innovation systems.","tokenCount":"611"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0411002695.json b/data/part_2/0411002695.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..23ac8329e3cbfd5accf52b5ee740f58c34232b8a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0411002695.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3608853dd14aee18d029cb124cc0dc02","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/b96ab351-0e66-461e-8919-8b7982b32ea9/retrieve","id":"-321529194"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"ca71c6cc-9093-4d2c-a0e9-b54dcfe48d38","pagecount":"4","content":"Mamadou Dembele I dentifiée par la Fédération des organisations des producteurs de banane du Mali comme une filière porteuse pour le développement économique national du pays, et dotée d'un fort potentiel de production (estimé à 35 000 t par an), la filière banane est pourtant sous-exploitée. En dépit de la position géographique favorable du Mali, différentes contraintes affectent sa production, notamment la non maîtrise des techniques appropriées. Or, la banane contribue à la sécurité alimentaire (elle représente une source substantielle de glucide) et constitue une opportunité socio-économique.L'une des préoccupations du Programme de productivité agricole en Afrique de l'Ouest (PPAAO-Mali), qui supporte la filière banane malienne depuis 2011-2012, est le développement et la diffusion de technologies en vue d'accroître la production agricole pour assurer la sécurité alimentaire et réduire la pauvreté. Aussi a-t-il initié, à l'intention des membres de la Fédération, une formation sur de nouvelles techniques de production visant à améliorer la productivité des bananerais et les revenus des producteurs. L'expérience a débuté dans le bassin de production à Koutiala (Sikasso) avant d'être étendue dans d'autres localités du cercle de Dioïla (Koulikoro).Le diagnostic effectué en 2010 par la Fédération sur la production de la banane au Mali, en particulier à Koutiala, a fait ressortir une diminution de la productivité des pieds de banane de 20 à 40 % de leur potentialité productive ces cinq dernières années due à un mode d'irrigation inapproprié, à l'apparition et au développement de la cercosporiose (une maladie de la souche de banane), et surtout à une méconnaissance de nouveaux itinéraires de production de la banane.Une formation sur ces nouveaux itinéraires a donc été mise place dans les zones de production avec pour objectifs i) d'accroître la productivité des pieds de banane en augmentant le poids des régimes des bannerais ; ii) de diminuer l'intensité de main d'oeuvre nécessaire dans les champs de banane ; iii) de permettre un développement végétatif normal du bannerais ; iv) de réduire les risques de cercosporiose ; v) et de permettre un bon murissement de la banane afin d'augmenter sa qualité organoleptique.La stratégie adoptée pour atteindre ces objectifs fut l'établissement d'un contrat de collaboration avec la Fédération des organisations des producteurs de la banane. Le chargé de la filière a dû suivre des formations en Côte d'Ivoire pour renforcer son expertise sur les nouveaux itinéraires de production.Pour améliorer la productivité des bananeraies et les revenus des producteurs de banane, la Fédération des organisations des producteurs de banane du Mali, en concertation avec le Programme de Productivité Agricole en Afrique de l'Ouest (PPAAO-Mali), a lancé un plan stratégique de développement de la filière consistant dans le renforcement des capacités de ses membres. C'est dans ce cadre que le PPAAO a initié un transfert de technologie dit « nouveaux itinéraires de production de la banane » dans le bassin de production à Koutiala (Sikasso).Couverture En plus de sa contribution à la sécurité alimentaire, la culture de la banane est un facteur de lutte contre l'exode rural et l'orpaillage en milieu rural devaient former à leur tour 80 producteurs dans les zones de production de la banane. Cette stratégie a permis de toucher un grand nombre de producteurs.L'évaluation technique menée par le Programme-Mali auprès des bénéficiaires dans le bassin de Koutiala a révélé plusieurs résultats positifs. Les 50 formateurs relais formés ont ainsi touché plus de 3 965 producteurs dans plusieurs villages. Le développement végétatif des plants de banane est désormais normal, et même excellent, ce qui permet au bananier d'arriver à maturité physiologique en huit ou neuf mois au lieu de douze mois. La combinaison des techniques (effeuillage, nettoyage, respect des écartements, etc.) a permis de passer à un rendement d'une tonne pour 25 régimes (contre moins d'une tonne pour 50 régimes auparavant). L'oeilletonnage, qui consiste à supprimer les rejets du bananier pour ne garder qu'un ou deux rejets par pieds-mère, a permis de réduire la quantité d'engrais à apporter aux plants de trois sacs à un sac et demi et d'augmenter le poids des régimes (70 régimes par t auparavant contre 30 régimes par t aujourd'hui). L'effeuillage, consistant à supprimer les feuilles mortes et celles du bas pour une meilleure aération de la bananeraie, a considérablement réduit l'infection par la cercosporiose et les grattages sur le fruit. La coupe de la fleur et la mise en place de tire-sève ont contribué à la maturité physiologique plus rapide du fruit. Le tuteurage, c'est à dire la mise en place d'une fourche de soutien afin d'empêcher les gros régimes de tomber au sol, a permis de réduire les pertes de bananes.Le nouvel itinéraire de production a permis de mettre en valeur 999 ha de surface supplémentaires.Les nouvelles techniques de production, importées de la Côte d'Ivoire, consistent à la destruction des rejets du bananier, l'effeuillage, la coupe des fleurs et la fertilisation. Elles ont été appliquées sur la banane Grande naine principalement cultivée au Mali. Cette variété a été choisie du fait de sa capacité d'adaptation aux conditions climatiques des zones de production et de son aptitude à se reproduire au champ par voie végétative (elle produit le matériel végétal, les rejets, nécessaire à la création de nouveaux plants).Pour bénéficier de cette intervention, les producteurs devaient posséder des parcelles de production et disposer d'équipements agricoles (motopompe et accessoires …), être capables de comprendre et d'appliquer les messages techniques et les conseils, se montrer motivés et disponibles. Une première séance de formation a concerné 50 formateurs relais qui La banane Grande naine a été choisie du fait de sa capacité d'adaptation aux conditions climatiques des zones de production et de son aptitude à se reproduire au champ par voie végétative.En vue d'assurer la durabilité du projet, la technique de production enseignée a été associée à la technique de plants issus de fragments de tige (PIF). Celle-ci répond au problème de vieillissement des bananeraies qui explique en partie les baisses de rendement enregistrées ces cinq dernières années et constitue un sérieux handicap pour le développement de la culture de la banane. C'est pourquoi la promotion de la technique PIF a été une innovation appréciable, accessible à tous les producteurs, même les plus petits, à moindre coût. Elle constitue une opportunité d'assurer la souveraineté semencière de la filière et de permettre une durabilité de la production de la banane au Mali.À travers les nouveaux itinéraires de production de la banane se dessinent les caractéristiques d'une nouvelle professionnalité de producteurs, et un ensemble de conditions qui définissent les traits d'une communauté apprenante et émergente dans la production de la banane au Mali. Cette communauté doit faire face à un certain nombre de défis :• Des difficultés de mobilisation de ressources financières pour amener un grand nombre de producteurs à la maitrise des nouvelles technologies de production de banane ;• L'insuffisance des mesures portant sur le renforcement de l'organisation des acteurs, la structuration de la filière, l'accès au financement, le développement des infrastructures adéquates pour une meilleure valorisation de la banane, les bonnes pratiques de gestion des eaux de surface, le développement du marché intérieur et l'amélioration de la qualité de la banane ;• De mauvaises conditions de stockage et de transport des bananes, qui contribuent pour beaucoup à l'altération de la qualité du fruit ;• La non sécurisation foncière, qui limite de plus en plus la culture de la banane aux environs des grandes villes, plus précisément dans le district de Bamako. Les terres se font rares du fait du développement de la ville et de la spéculation foncière qui atteint aujourd'hui même les villages éloignés ;• L'insuffisance de soutien matériel, financier et technique apporté aux femmes productrices de banane, celles-ci s'intéressant de plus en plus à la production de banane ;• L'insuffisance d'agents spécialisés dans le suiviaccompagnement des acteurs de la filière banane. ","tokenCount":"1286"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0447361405.json b/data/part_2/0447361405.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..20c4df3768356ce3914d546454dc92d67aa4a25a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0447361405.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"da1dde334c4e2b3ae214c9b53f436eee","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/8b521ba3-cc75-4f55-9b32-1c2ba42fa631/retrieve","id":"-1762970835"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"c9e755ba-656e-48aa-966e-bff1169b593e","pagecount":"8","content":"MAIZE is a very well structured, articulated and conceptualised CRP proposal. In general, it sets out a reasonable, achievable and important agenda for research. Following more than 30 years of maize research at CIMMYT and IITA, this proposal now brings forward a strategic, integrated and comprehensive international approach to maize research. Openness to develop collaboration with all key institutes involved in maize research is an important step forward to avoid duplicative work and thus increase efficiency and accelerate progress that builds on each partner's experience and expertise.As with CRP proposals previously approved, MAIZE has been developed without the guidance of an overarching CGIAR strategy for prioritizing research. However, maize is one of the three global food security crops, and among the three, the most dynamic in terms of demand growth, land area requirements, yield growth, and knock-on effects on land-use change. It is also very important as a food crop and as an income source to many of the world's poor. Given the projected importance of maize for achieving the broad development goals presented in the current Strategy and Results Framework, a program on maize and maize systems is justifiable. However, the expected dynamics of maize production and research have implications for this CRP as discussed below.Against the background of the CGIAR's overarching goals, the rationale of MAIZE is compelling for the research agenda presented in nine distinct but well integrated Strategic Initiatives (SI), and the overall goals are clear.Program objectives are consistent with the SRF. The program rationale is strongly based on the analysis of effects that commodity price fluctuations have on the poor and of the effects that increasing production demands have on expansion of land in maize production. The importance of maize to global food security and income for the poor is clear and increasing. In general, researchable topics are derived from careful analysis of current problems and opportunities. The nine Strategic Initiatives (SIs) constitute a comprehensive program that covers the essential aspects for enhancing sustainable productivity in maize-based systems. The regional focus of program implementation is appropriate. Working on clearly defined types of farming systems based on dominance of maize production is an effective organizing tool for this CRP, and also for delineating boundaries and linkages with other CRPs. However, given the complexity and heterogeneity of the factors affecting impact on agricultural development in these farming systems, the constraint analysis is necessarily at a very general level only. Refining and adjusting this framework with better data, analytical tools and a process of multi-stakeholder consultation should be given a high priority as this CRP develops to help adjust SI components in terms of resource allocation, objectives, geographic focus, program outcomes and impact pathways. The \"value chain\" perspective emerging in some of the SIs should more clearly influence hypothesis development and implementation of research.The proposal encompasses investments on a very broad range of activities-from increasing the efficiency of input use through smallholder precision agriculture, to molecular work on stress tolerance, to post-harvest processing. The very large agenda, squeezed into the nine SIs, and which include substantial components of continuing maize research from CIMMYT and IITA, would benefit from continuous review and prioritization. In this regard, it is positive that in most themes initial milestones include diagnostic analysis of opportunities and constraints. Strong donor influence in deciding on program orientation, which is indicated in the proposal, will challenge prioritization if based solely on the strategic framework developed for this CRP.The proposal defines two types of smallholders as the targeted beneficiary groups: (1) those in stress-prone environments with poor market access, and (2) those that are market-oriented but technology-constrained in more benign environments. The ISPC strongly believes, however, that more attention should be given to poor consumers. In many countries that are priority areas for the MAIZE proposal, urban maize consumers are a large and growing fraction of the population. However, little consideration is given to urban consumers, and especially poor urban consumers. The drivers, constraints and preferences relevant to this group are likely to be different from those relevant to the producers. Hence, the strategy should encompass consumers and other chain actors. More attention should also be placed on the dynamics between these target groups that currently are presented as very static. In many ways the proposed research that address the needs of Target Group 2 of maize producers and systems could have strong positive impact on urban consumers, but these linkages need to be considered explicitly as this CRP develops.The proposal has not sufficiently considered other dynamics that affect developing countries and even the resource poor smallholders. These include: declining importance of maize as a food relative to rice and wheat due to other drivers of demand, particularly animal feed, and possibly biofuels; effects of industrial development and multilateral trade agreements on poverty alleviation, particularly on smallholder segments of agriculture in some regions; rate of technology dispersion even in resource poor regions; synergy between research on tropical and temperate maize; role of private sector along with emerging markets in regions where Target Group 1 is prevalent, including its effects on seed market evolution where clear patterns of mergers and acquisitions can be observed due to takeovers of small local seed companies by much larger national and multinational companies. From a strategic viewpoint these trends must be recognized, understood, and addressed in subsequent priority setting and adjustment across SIs.The proposal is very clearly directed at delivery and impact, which are discussed for each SI. There is a clear description of outputs, outcomes, and milestones. In most SIs there is reference to earlier and current work done at CIMMYT in particular, but also at IITA, and in several cases both lessons learned and progress are explained, which supports the feasibility of the proposed milestones. Impact estimates are presented at the intermediate (first order) level, which is useful. These targets are, however, quite opaque because the baseline levels are not defined or quantified. Subsequently is it not easy to assess the feasibility of monitoring progress. While we commend the attempted ex ante impact analysis, the quantifications are not convincing, and we would like to see a discussion of how these numbers were arrived at. Perhaps most important, the outcomes and impacts on poor urban consumers should be included in the analysis, Furthermore, it would to evaluate the differential effect of different maize technology and/or policy interventions. We therefore encourage further development and refinement of this ex ante impact assessment methodology as a tool for continued improvement in prioritizing the research agenda as this CRP develops.A stronger a program-level theory of change should be developed, including the underlying assumptions and definitions of expected innovations, and HOW the program intends to achieve its objectives through the multi-institutional innovation systems. The proposal provides reasonably appropriate assumptions about risks although more thorough sensitivity analysis is needed of key assumptions that strongly affect likelihood of outcomes.For germplasm, impacts appear to be based on an assumption that pathways are relatively straightforward. However, generating impact from genetic improvement of crops and livestock that benefit poor farmers in resource constrained environments has been difficult due to a number of constraints. Several of these bottle necks are recognized; for instance capacity and risk aversion preventing adoption of improved varieties, but a more thorough analysis is recommended.Despite discussion of outcomes at the SI level, the proposal lacks a clear and coherent strategy for program-level outcomes beyond the sum of individual SI outputs. While objectives from all nine SIs can be justified as having significant potential to achieve impacts contribute to one or more SRF SLOs, only a small portion of these are likely to be widely adopted to provide significant quantifiable impact on smallholder target groups. This is especially true for improved germplasm where downstream constraints to adoption are many, especially in harsh environments. For example, identification of hybrids is left to NARS and Local Seed Companies-the latter of variable and declining quality following two decades of acquisition by multinationals looking to purchase high quality local companies. Thus a relatively well designed research program has a risk at the results management and delivery end, particularly regarding stock seed maintenance, hybrid seed production.It is commendable the Proposal recognizes the limited economic value of open pollinated maize even for resource poor smallholders and thus emphasizes the need for hybrid research and development. That, however, is more demanding, particularly at the delivery end. An effective delivery and outcome-oriented strategy for hybrids would need to better align the levels from up-stream research to delivery encompassing the following: (i) a strategy and concept for breeding product development, including acquisition of the necessary genetic components for prioritized traits and development of stocks and improved, appropriately adapted hybrids; (ii) support to NARS for regional and national breeding and evaluation; and (iii) support of local seed companies for quality control in seed multiplication and delivery. Management needs to support these linkages through capacity review among inhouse teams and partners. Policies, markers and financial services will also affect achievement of outcomes.The more upstream research is presented as having high potential for improving the efficiency and precision of germplasm improvement. For several advancements clear timelines are presented. It would be useful to identify also the risks associated to this research. In some cases the time lines seem too ambitious (breeder-ready markers for largeeffect QTLs for biotic stress resistance, efficient incorporation in adapted backgrounds of at least two transgenes for drought or nitrogen use efficiency, acid-, waterlogging-and heattolerant hybrids in advanced validation/PVS testing), and with SI8 (seeds of discovery) the outcomes may require a much longer time line. Some components of the program could be considered as too ambitious. Areas such as production systems (with innovation systems focus), precision agriculture and post harvest are relatively new to CGIAR maize research and represent risks in terms of finding the needed research skills, as well as new partners to adapt the new approaches to local conditions and formulate impact pathways. Pathways for these innovations will be quite different than the better understood impact pathways for germplasm. With SI2 the estimated impacts are very large by 2020-2030 considering the types of deliverables from the initiative (information, decision guides, and methods), unless there is a chain of other interventions enabled by the SI delivery. Some overlap can be seen between SI3 (sustainable intensification) and SI5 (double yield) and given the relatively small resource allocation to SI3 and what has earlier been said about enhancing focus on program outputs and outcomes, these two SIs could be merged. The CRP's process monitoring and impact assessment includes appropriate dimensions. Participatory reviews of milestones in each region and SI is commendable, and plans for quality monitoring involving partners and a learning loop (for instance for research and service delivery) can be further strengthened. However, plans for identification of performance metrics should be refined in concert with other CRPs, and in consultation with the Consortium. Good metrics should provide input to assessment and review of SIs and SI components, and such evaluations should foster incentives for high quality research and accountability for donors and stakeholders. Thus purely quantitative indicators for shortterm performance (p. 57) do not seem appropriate except for internal recording.The program proposes partnerships that span well into adaptive research and locally integrated approaches, local capacity building and scaling up. In these activities the Centers' role is bridging and supportive. There are indications that in the broad consultations that have preceded development of the proposal, regional and NARS priorities have been incorporated into the international agenda.Plans to address gender issues and inclusion of women as participants are systematically included for each SI. However, the research to address women's constraints is not well considered. For example, recognition of women's workload and drudgery are not considered although they have multiple implications, for instance in conservation tillage that often requires additional manual weeding and other labor requirements that can be constraints to adoption. More consideration should be put on technological interventions that have the potential to benefit women. Capacity building needs are identified in SI-specific contexts, which are appropriate, and training activities are planned in considerable detail. However, capacity building strategies could be strengthened with inclusion of institutional capacity and support for regional coordination.Baseline studies are included in plans to facilitate ex post impact assessment. However, because much of this CRP represents continuation of long-term maize research, adoption studies and ex post impact assessment on earlier work should also continue.The germplasm research and breeding approaches appear sound and include several innovative components. The track record of partners in these areas is also of high science quality. SI8 and 9 capture well the opportunities from advanced genomics and phenotyping. Much of this work has been advanced in the Generation Challenge Program (GCP) and can benefit from continuous cereal-wide collaboration within the CGIAR. General lists of methods, outstanding innovations (for instance in SI8 they are highly relevant) and partners give a good indication of quality research. Lists of references for each SI, and lessons learnt in Part 2 are very useful. Both novel, high-potential and proven research approaches and methods are used in a balanced way; for instance exploring intra-specific untapped genetic diversity but, at the same time, identifying opportunities for using transformation in particular situations (page 61). The ISPC supports the CRP's strategy and rationale for transgenic maize, which is the predominant transgenic crop globally. However, a necessary innovation regarding this technology is development of new and creative ways (science and policy based) to empower the international and national research systems to develop and distribute such technologies with the necessary degrees of freedom.In some cases there is clearly scope for improving quality. For instance, the reference upon which estimates of climate change impact on maize yields is very weak. In fact, improving capacity to estimate impact of climate change on future maize yields in developing countries should be a high priority and will require collaboration with CRP7. Another area of concern is the lack of minimum datasets (particularly on various biophysical parameters) to support research on SIs 2, 3 and 5. Specifications for baseline data collection, including suitable data to allow tracking farming system performance, should be included as a matter of priority. Attention should be given to how performance benchmarks can be measured and monitored at reasonable cost and accuracy, and how data collection and data use in monitoring can be made coherent across all CRPs for similar components. In addition to methods and accumulated benchmark data that have IPG nature, the proposal should be more explicit about the IPGs that are generated from SIs 2, 3 and 5.Although, on one hand, partners for state-of-the-art genomics and phenotyping are already identified and committed in collaborative projects; and, on the other hand, the Centers and partners hold well maintained maize genetic collections, it is the breeding, testing and scaling-up capacities, and their links with seed production systems, that will make the difference at regional and local levels for generating economic and social impacts. This has been discussed above. The CRP cannot lose sight of this aspect in the process of making research products available to national agricultural systems. Thus stakeholder involvement, particularly in ex ante analysis (SI1) and in SI3 focusing on closing the yield gap, is important. In aiming to double maize productivity for poor farmers (SI5) and some components of influencing policies (SI1), managing deliverables and attracting partners among stakeholders need to come together. Establishing clear rules for the use of intellectual property is essential for generating incentives and trust.The program is not particular elaborate regarding social science research, which is not especially innovative. Social science is essential in several SIs, and SI1 is designed to address targeting, institutional innovations and markets. Economics needs to be more prominent. Linkages with CRP2 could be stronger and more explicit.The partnerships are comprehensive, there is a strong framework defining the kinds of partners that provide value to each of the SIs, and partner linkages are defined for SIs. The proposal enlists support of dozens of the world's leading research institutions over a broad spectrum to leverage international resources as much as possible. Management of these partnerships is less clear. In fact, the large number of partners (>300) represents a challenge to management at different levels, particularly if there is frequent turnover among partners. Likewise, the number of institutions involved seems far in excess of the number that could be effectively coordinated. The question of what research takes place inside the MAIZE collaboration and what takes place outside the collaboration could end up being quite complicated.Therefore, the partnership strategy needs to be very clear. Particular challenges and opportunities of working with the big five multinational seed companies should be clearly analyzed, given that maize is a crop in which the private sector is spending at least 10 times what this CRP will spend. Private sector linkages are important regarding genome sequencing but the Program needs to be prepared to negotiate handling of restrictions to secure benefits from these partnerships. Intellectual property rights (IPR) issues are relevant for most of the SIs and the arrangements should be clear and transparent regarding final products and generating and publishing new knowledge. In networks there are plans to provide some exclusivity for partners to provide incentives. The conditions for such exclusivity agreements need to be clear. The concept of \"pre-competitive ag-commons\" and developing of \"open-source\" technology exchange and breeding practices is innovative and highly commendable.Links to other CRPs are discussed but there are more opportunities for MAIZE to leverage other CRPs. For example, CRP2 has considerable work on input and output markets and risk management, and these are major issues for maize in Africa. In countries where maize is the major food staple, the maize CRP should be able to partner with CRP2 as the lead CRP. Similarly, CRP4 (nutrition and health), once established could assume the lead on quality maize research and research on maize mycotoxins. Closer partnership with CRP7 (Climate Change) would also be beneficial. Collaboration both in planning and implementing components that address research production and innovation systems will be important. However, in management of all the cross-dimensional partnerships (MAIZE partners and CRP partners) transaction costs need to be controlled.The proposal is frank in its partnership risk assessment in stating that intended partner engagement depends significantly on availability of funding and other factors, such as dependence on restricted funding which could shift attention from the big picture due to sporadic partner engagement, and disturb the research dynamic thus leading to waste of resources. The capacity of NARS, and local seed companies also poses a potential risk and may require change of strategy. Risk analysis should thus be strengthened both at SI and Program levels.The CRP3.2 is dominated by the lead-center, CIMMYT, which is reflected also in the projected contribution from CIMMYT. No other partner has a comparable role in this CRP. Unlike GRiSP, the planning of which started some years before agreement of the CRP structure, MAIZE is a product of the reform. The CGIAR community can expect that the MAIZE partnership will foster future fruitful collaboration of CIMMYT and IITA, and management should support this aspiration. The current proposal does not show how this collaboration could be considered in designing program management. CRP management support receives little attention and only one staff is identified (to take care of the Web portal). CRP management expenses are described as an onerous affliction. The Management Committee includes relevant directors and representative of the research primary partners (three other organizations currently considered in addition to CIMMYT and IITA). Program management is, however, closely held by the lead-center. The ISPC would argue such tight control is not a good framework for management and governance of a multi-partner program in an increasingly collaborative funding environment. Aggregation of control exceeds the level needed to control risks related to the lead Center's legal and fiduciary responsibilities. Although half of the CRP management budget is allocated to knowledge management, monitoring and evaluation but the grounds for these budget estimates are not explained.The budget presentation indicates that CIMMYT's contribution is a very large part of the overall budget. While projections through 2013 are more speculative, the relative size of CIMMYT's role compared to that of IITA continues to track in a relatively constant manner. It is also projected that a large proportion of funding will come from bilateral sources. The associated influence of those bilateral donors is a concern if their priorities are not consistent with the strategic framework and this CRP.The CRP also lacks a strong mechanism for independent oversight and evaluation. There will be an Oversight Committee, but there are no details of how it will be elected. However, the Oversight Committee fulfil the role of independent oversight under the following conditions: A mechanism by which \"at large\" members (those not representing participating Centers or primary research partners) can be nominated and appointed in a manner not wholly influenced or controlled by the lead Center,  A greater number of at large than representative members  Term limits or a similar mechanism that provides for turnover among at large members and encourages individual performance  A committee chair that is nominated from among the committee members and serves for a fixed term  The authority to commission periodic external evaluations of the CRP, including its management and governanceThe ISPC therefore strongly recommends that the Oversight Committee be established according to these conditions.","tokenCount":"3548"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0483794892.json b/data/part_2/0483794892.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..62c31ae38474937676b92d5bfd2103c449fa3a06 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0483794892.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"857f41221f359303b0705cc9c5eb54e8","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/cff83285-cc7f-4513-b561-a0457e847724/retrieve","id":"-2008100276"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"877c4a36-8a60-4422-94db-dd69711d99fc","pagecount":"34","content":"Through action research and development partnerships, Africa RISING is creating opportunities for smallholder farm households to move out of hunger and poverty through sustainably intensified farming systems that improve food, nutrition, and income security, particularly for women and children, and conserve or enhance the natural resource base.For West Africa to be self-sufficient in food production, the need to adopt sustainable intensification (SI) approach is urgent. Low productivity across all farming systems is the major challenge for the region's agriculture. The major factors responsible for the low productivity include land degradation, low soil fertility, climate variability and poor adoption of improved technologies.The farm household scale is the focal domain for Africa RISING's SI investments and activities. This is the scale at which household production decisions, gender, nutrition issues, household welfare as well as soil health and productivity issues operate. Research activities at this scale focus on understanding household needs and incentives that support effective evaluation, adoption, and adaptation of the most relevant interventions.The program co-develops with partners and shares with end-user soil and water conservation technologies on cowpea in mixed farming systems. Beyond soil and water conservation, field observations in recent years have revealed that farmer planning, including timing of planting and agronomic management practices, is often haphazard. However, if planned well it offers numerous dividends such as early crop vigor, drought avoidance, tolerance to pests and diseases. This reference manual on soil and water conservation also complements training of extension agents and development partners on use of crop planning matrix for improved crop productivity, thus developing both human and institutional capacity. It has been prepared as a practical guide to help farmers produce crops sustainably. This user-friendly soil and water conservation manual was made possible with support from the American people delivered through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) as part of the US Government's Feed the Future Initiative. The contents are the responsibility of the producing organization and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of USAID or the U.S. Government. The three regional projects are led by the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (in West Africa and East and Southern Africa) and the International Livestock Research Institute (in the Ethiopian Highlands). The International Food Policy Research Institute leads the program's monitoring, evaluation, and impact assessment.The Africa RISING Program in West Africa aims at creating opportunities for smallholder farm households to move out of hunger and poverty. Sustainably intensification (SI) farming systems approach is used to conserve the land resource base to improve food, nutrition, and income security, particularly for women and children. It is now known that Soil and water conservation practices ensure that the land resource base is protected from degradation. However, the practices are not easy to implement on the field especially on mixed farming systems. This field manual is designed to assist Africa Rising Farmers practice soil and water conservation in mixed farming systems. These include the use of grassed waterways, erosion control methods, soil fertility improvement, crop-livestock systems, mixed cropping systems for optimum use of soil water at different soil depths.Climate smart soil and water conservation practices provide scalable SI innovation packages that improve sustainability, resilience, and equity in most farming systems. Training of farmers in Soil and water conservation Farmer Field schools enhances quick adoption of practices. This improves crop productivity (yield), economic profitability (crop sales), environment sustainability (reduced soil erosion, drought stress and improve soil fertility) and social conditions (improved nutrition).The manual targets extension and farmers. It covers aspects like knowing the soil and terrain that farmers work on. Features of erosion peculiar to farm fields. The soil texture and depth are important for characterizing potential soil moisture retention. Therefore, simple identification of soil texture has been illustrated. Contouring using A-Frame has been illustrated including composting and some methods to regenerate soil fertility. Cowpea living mulch in mixed farming system has been used for most of the illustrations. Chapter 2: Know your terrainIt is appropriate to know your terrain. Best farmlands are generally flat or gently sloping. Note that most fields in Northern Ghana slope in multiple directions. To understand your terrain:• Move round the field and observe erosion features on the soil surface (Figure 2.1a).• Identify the direction and level of slope as flat, steep, and gentle (Figure 2.3).• Use A-frame to determine master contour (Figure 2.4). Use the line level to determine your slope as following:• Hold the two sticks vertically upright with the first stick placed at the starting point.• Stretch the string tightly between the two sticks.• Move the second stick along the direction of slope.• Move the string of the second graduated stick up until the bubble in the spirit-level indicates level. This gives the difference in height of the two (2) positions. • The height difference divided by the distance between the two sticks indicate the slope. To control soil erosion typical of Africa RISING farmers' fields in Ghana, the difference in land level between contour lines should be 0.3 -0.5 m. The following procedure should be adopted to establish the master contour and other subsequent contours.• Position your master contour in the middle of the field.• Use Line-Level to establish the master contour by stretching the string tightly between the two sticks across the slope. • Move the string of the second graduated stick up until the bubble in the spirit-level is at the centre. • Put a peg and continue.• Re-align zigzag pegs to smooth out the master contour.• Other contour lines should be established at the same distance upslope and downslope.Using A-frame to determine master contour.Alternatively, A-Frame can establish the master contour (Figure 2.4).• At the middle of the field, position the A-Frame and put a peg for the first point.• Swing the second leg slowly across the slope until the plumb line is at the center of marked line. • The two (2) points are at the same level so put a second peg.• Place the first leg at the second peg and swing the second leg to determine the next level. • Continue the process to the edge of the field.• Re-align zigzag pegs to smooth out the master contour.• Other contour lines should be established at the same distance upslope and downslope.Chapter 3: Agronomic soil and water conservationEffective soil and water conservation is a combination of a number of technologies. These may be classified as agronomic (Figures 3.1 and 3.2), crop management (Figure 3.3).The natural process of decay tends to change organic wastes into humus-like material usually called compost. Figure 3.1 shows preparation of compost. From soil and water resilience perspective, it can be used to improve soil fertility by: • Providing organic matter to the soil and improving capacity for nutrient retention.• Increasing soil water holding capacity and reducing soil erosion.Choose a site under shade close to the house and dig a pit about one (1) cubic meter. ii.Collect biodegradable materials and separate them into their components. Start the foundation with chopped maize/cowpea straw, animal beddings or leaves. ii.Sprinkle water and wood ash. iii.Add manure and repeat the process until pit is almost full. iv.Sprinkle urea or sulfate of ammonia if available. v.Cover with soil and sprinkle some water. vi.After 14 to 20 days open the pit and remove wastes layer by layer. vii.Re-pile the layers with the first layer at the bottom followed by the second layer in that order and cover with soil. viii.After 40 to 45 days, the compost is ready to use. No-till mixed farming using maize and cowpea-living mulch • No-till is planting on unprepared land by opening narrow slits for seed coverage.Weeds may be controlled by using herbicides. Mixed cropping is planting different crops on the same piece of land.• Cultivate the soil and sow one main crop of longer duration.• Intersperse the main cover crop with crops of intermediate maturity periods.Suitability: Fields prone to sheet and rill erosion.• Provides maximum soil cover but exploits nutrients and soil water at different layers of the soil. • Provides food for household at different periods in the growing season.• Provides maximum soil cover.• Exploits nutrients and soil water at different layers of the soil.• Natural soil fertility is regenerated.This approach prevents water from causing damage by reducing runoff speed. This tends to conserve water and control runoff. The major limitation is the high cost of construction and the need for technical support. These include:• Earth and stone bunds (Figure 4.1).• Alternating beds/bunds and drainage channels (Figure 4.2).• Terracing (Figure 4.3).• Vegetated waterways (Figure 4.4). Stone bunds are piled stones parallel to the master contour at specific distances. Cropping is carried out within the inter-contour bunds. Earth bunds can be used.• Use A-Frame or line level to establish the master contour.• Determine the number of rows of the intended crops.• Arrange the stone barriers before and after the number of rows crop.Suitability: Stony areas.• Soil water storage is improved.• The stones trap soil particles and decomposed organic matter.Chapter 5: Cropping calendar for cereal-legume mixed cropping systems Onset and cessation of rains is very important for cropping calendar of Africa RISING farmers. The cropping calendar begins with land preparation, planting, fertilizer application, weeding, harvesting and fallow period. The cropping is interspersed/separated with drought depending on soil water requirements of the intended crop. Figure 5.1 presents the general cropping calendar for maize, groundnut, soybean, and cowpea in Northern Ghana for planning cereal-maize mixed farming systems. ","tokenCount":"1558"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0493173178.json b/data/part_2/0493173178.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..be86688d71c423141ca9f706377767ae4fa19fb3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0493173178.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7a807adde681d0102f43276bbed9646d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/0330146e-4a21-4ba6-abee-f733dc27da49/retrieve","id":"1859450176"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"07f5f993-a3d2-485e-83b2-fd7838066378","pagecount":"2","content":"Description of the innovation: The IRRI Rice Quality Assessment Kit consists of a set of various tools that help measuring one or several paddy, milled rice or seed quality traits. It is intended to be used in postharvest and other quality related training courses but several of the kits have already been purchased by millers and other value chain actors to help them in their daily tasks too. It is used globally by millers, extension workers, etc. New Innovation: No Innovation type: Production systems and Management practices Stage of innovation: Stage 4: uptake by next user (USE) Geographic Scope: Global Number of individual improved lines/varieties: Outcome Impact Case Report: Description of Stage reached:The IRRI Rice Quality Assessment Kit is available in the second half of 2019 from GrainPro Inc.; several of the kits have already been purchased by millers and other value chain actors to help them in their daily tasks too. There is a continuous flow of inquiries for the kit.","tokenCount":"166"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0495749415.json b/data/part_2/0495749415.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e6a94b40002250f037ede459d377db76c3be49b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0495749415.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d4539e25ea5b3ba22cf83529701e6f03","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/b7c641a9-004c-44d0-bcaf-fbc05581a344/content","id":"2084663625"},"keywords":["Solanum tuberosum","genomic prediction in potato","genomic × environment interaction","multienvironment modeling","multiple trait modeling","single-environment modeling","single-trait modeling"],"sieverID":"d30b036a-11ba-4b4a-bd87-1b8f1ca72945","pagecount":"13","content":"In this study, we extend research on genomic prediction (GP) to polysomic polyploid plant species with the main objective to investigate single-trait (ST) and multitrait (MT) multienvironment (ME) models using field trial data from 3 locations in Sweden [Helgegården (HEL), Mosslunda (MOS), Umeå (UM)] over 2 years (2020, 2021) of 253 potato cultivars and breeding clones for 5 tuber weight traits and 2 tuber flesh quality characteristics. This research investigated the GP of 4 genome-based prediction models with genotype × environment interactions (GEs): (1) ST reaction norm model (M1), (2) ST model considering covariances between environments (M2), (3) ST M2 extended to include a random vector that utilizes the environmental covariances (M3), and (4) MT model with GE (M4). Several prediction problems were analyzed for each of the GP accuracy of the 4 models. Results of the prediction of traits in HEL, the high yield potential testing site in 2021, show that the best-predicted traits were tuber flesh starch (%), weight of tuber above 60 or below 40 mm in size, and the total tuber weight. In terms of GP, accuracy model M4 gave the best prediction accuracy in 3 traits, namely tuber weight of 40-50 or above 60 mm in size, and total tuber weight, and very similar in the starch trait. For MOS in 2021, the best predictive traits were starch, weight of tubers above 60, 50-60, or below 40 mm in size, and the total tuber weight. MT model M4 was the best GP model based on its accuracy when some cultivars are observed in some traits. For the GP accuracy of traits in UM in 2021, the best predictive traits were the weight of tubers above 60, 50-60, or below 40 mm in size, and the best model was MT M4, followed by models ST M3 and M2.Genomic prediction (GP) and selection (GS) have changed the paradigm of plant and animal breeding (Meuwissen et al. 2001;de los Campos et al. 2009;Crossa et al. 2010Crossa et al. , 2011;;Desta and Ortiz 2014). Practical evidence has shown that GS provides important increases in prediction accuracy for genomic-aided breeding (Pérez-Rodríguez et al. 2012;Crossa et al. 2014Crossa et al. , 2017)). Additive genetic effects (breeding values) can be predicted directly from parametric and semi-parametric statistical models using marker effects like the ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction (Endelman 2011), or by developing the genomic relationship inear kernel matrix (G) to fit the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP;VanRaden 2008). Departures from linearity can be assessed by semi-parametric approaches, such as Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space regression using the Gaussian kernel (GK) or different types of neural networks (Gianola et al. 2006;Gianola and Van Kaam 2008;de los Campos et al. 2010;González-Camacho et al. 2012;Pérez-Rodríguez et al. 2012;Gianola et al. 2014;Sousa et al. 2017).Standard GP models were extended to multienvironment (ME) data by assessing genomic × environment interaction (GE; Burgueño et al. 2012). Jarquín et al. (2014) proposed an extension of the GBLUP or random effects model, where the main effects of markers and environmental covariates could be introduced using covariance structures that are functions of marker genotypes and environments. Consistently, GP accuracy substantially increased when incorporating GE and marker × environment interaction (Crossa et al. 2017). Cuevas et al. (2016) and Sousa et al. (2017) applied the marker × environment interaction GS model of Lopez-Cruz et al. (2015), but modeled not only through the standard GBLUP but also through a nonlinear GK like that used by de los Campos et al. (2010) and a GK with the bandwidth estimated through an empirical Bayesian method (Pérez-Elizalde et al. 2015). Cuevas et al. (2016) concluded that the higher prediction accuracy of GK models with the GE model is due to more flexible kernels that allow accounting for small, more complex marker main effects and marker-specific interaction effects.In GP, the training set usually includes a sufficient overlap of lines across environments, so that estimating the phenotypic covariance among environments for modeling GE is sufficient to specify it on the linear mixed model used. When modeling GE, some researchers used the mathematical operation defined by the Kronecker products or direct product (Cuevas et al. 2016) that allows operations of 2 matrices of different dimensions. Other authors model GE using the matrix operation named Hadamard products (also known as element-wise products), which is a binary operation between 2 matrices of the same dimensions as the operands (Jarquín et al. 2014;Lopez-Cruz et al. 2015;Acosta-Pech et al. 2017;Perez-Rodriguez et al. 2017;Sukumaran et al. 2017;Basnet et al. 2019). When modeling epistasis, Hadamard products of the additive genomic relationship have mainly been used (e.g. Jiang and Reif 2015;Martini et al. 2016;Vitezica et al. 2017;Varona et al. 2018;Martini et al. 2020). However, Burgueño et al. (2007) have used Kronecker products for modeling and the estimation of additive, additive × environment interaction, additive × additive epistasis, and additive × additive × environment interactions by means of the coefficient of parentage. In a recent study, Martini et al. (2020) gave theoretical proof that both methods lead to the same covariance model when used with some specific design matrices and illustrated how to explicitly model the interaction between markers, temperature, and precipitation.Traditionally, GP models have evolved from the singletrait (ST) and single-environment prediction (ST-SE) models to ST-ME models including GE. Furthermore, standard GS-assisted plant breeding models are concerned with the assessment of the GP accuracy of a multitrait (MT) measured in a single environment (MT-SE) or MT-MEs. In general, MT GP models have evolved from MT-SE to MT-ME. The MT models are keys for improving prediction accuracy in GS because they offer benefits regarding the ST models when the traits under study are correlated. Most existing models for GP are the ST models although the MT models have several advantages over the ST (Montesinos-López et al. 2019). Compared with ST, MT can simultaneously exploit the correlation between cultivar and traits and thus improve the accuracy of GP as they are computationally more efficient than ST (Montesinos-López et al. 2019). When the traits are correlated, MT models improve parameter estimates and prediction accuracy as compared to ST models (Schulthess et al. 2018;Calus and Veerkamp 2011;Jiang and Jannink 2012;Montesinos-López et al. 2016, 2019;He et al. 2016). With the continuous growth of computational power, MT models play an increasingly important role in data analysis in plant and animal genomic−aided breeding for selecting the best candidate genotypes.The use of MT models is not as widespread as the use of ST models because of several factors such as, among others, lack of efficient and friendly software, and not enough computational resources. Likewise, MT models have more complex GEs that make it difficult to assess and achieve MT model assumptions. Furthermore, MT models have more problems of convergence than ST models. Some models have been proposed for MT GP, e.g. MT mixed models and their Bayesian version. Bayesian MT genomic best linear unbiased predictor and MT models under artificial deep neural networks were applied to maize and wheat data sets (Montesinos-López et al. 2018, 2019). However, most researchers use MT models to improve prediction accuracy for traits to be predicted (i.e. the prediction set)-which are tedious and timeconsuming to measure and have low heritability-by using a few traits (i.e. the training set) with high heritability that are highly correlated with the former prediction set (Jiang and Jannink 2012;Semagn et al. 2022).It is widely recognized that from the statistical and quantitative genetics perspectives, when data on MTs are available, the preferred models are the MT as they can account for correlations between phenotypic traits in the training set because borrowing information from correlated traits increases GP accuracy. Montesinos-López et al. (2022) investigated Bayesian MT kernel methods for GP and illustrated the power of linear, Gaussian, polynomial, and sigmoid kernels. The authors compared these kernels with the conventional ridge regression and GBLUP MT models. Montesinos-López et al. (2022) showed that, in general, but not always, the GK method outperformed conventional Bayesian ridge and GBLUP MT in terms of GP prediction performance. These authors concluded that the improvement in terms of prediction performance of the Bayesian MT kernel method can be attributed to the proposed model being able to capture nonlinear patterns more efficiently than linear MT models. Semagn et al. (2022) were interested in comparing prediction accuracy estimates of a subset of lines that have been tested for an ST, with a subset of lines that have not been tested for certain proportion traits (MT1, certain cultivars were not tested for any of the traits), and a subset of lines that have been tested for some traits but not for other traits (MT2) across different bread wheat genetic backgrounds for agronomic traits of varying genetic architecture evaluated under conventional and organic management systems, and several host plant resistance traits evaluated in adult plants under standard field management. Their results show that the predictive ability of the MT2 model was significantly greater than that of the ST and MT1 models for most of the traits and populations, except common bunt, with the MT1 model being intermediate between them, thus demonstrating the high potential of the MT models in improving prediction accuracy.Although most GP research for ST and MT for SE or ME has been applied to diploid species, a recent study by Ortiz et al. (2022) demonstrated the increase in prediction accuracy of ST-ME over the ST-SE genomic-estimated breeding values for several tetrasomic potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) breeding clones and released cultivars for various traits evaluated in several sites for 1 year. Ortiz et al. (2022) considered 4 dosages of marker alleles (A) pseudo-diploid; (B) additive tetrasomic polyploidy, and (C) additive-nonadditive tetrasomic polyploidy, and B + C dosages together in the genome-based prediction models using the conventional linear GBLUP (GB) and the nonlinear GK for ST-SE and ST-ME together. Results show that GK did not show any clear advantage over GB, and ST-ME had prediction accuracy estimates higher than those obtained from ST-SE. The model with GB was the best method in combination with the marker structures C or B + C for predicting most of the tuber traits. Most of the traits gave relatively high prediction accuracy under this combination of marker structure C or (B + C) and methods GB and GK combined with ST-ME including the GE model.Based on the above considerations, and the need to extend research on GP to polysomic polyploid plant species, the main objectives of this research were to investigate ST vs MT for ME (GE) models using trial data from 3 locations [namely Helgegården (HEL), Mosslunda (MOS), and Umeå (UM)] over 2 years (2020,2021) of 253 potato cultivars and breeding clones, which were also included by Ortiz et al. (2022). In this study, we will use only the genomic relationship matrix obtained from the additivenonadditive tetrasomic polyploidy (C), because using this genomic relations matrix in terms of GP accuracy was found to be one with the best GP accuracy (Ortiz et al. 2022). This research investigated the GP of 4 genome-based prediction models including either Hadamard or Kronecker product matrices for assessing GE: (1) the conventional reaction norm model incorporating GE with Hadamard product (Jarquín et al. 2014) (2) GE model considering covariances between environments, similar to the model employed by Burgueño et al. (2012) or the GE with Kronecker product (M2); (3) GE model 2 including a random vector that attempts to more efficiently utilize the environmental covariances as in Cuevas et al. (2017) or a GE with Kronecker product (M3); and (4) an MT model with GE as in Montesinos-López et al. (2022), but including a GE model that joins Hadamard and Kronecker products (M4). Several prediction problems were analyzed for the GP accuracy of each of the 4 models. We investigated the prediction set of locations in the year 2021 from locations in the year 2020 using the 4 GP models combined with 2 of the prediction sets (100 and 70%) and predicting ST and MT.The MT experiments included 256 potato breeding clones and cultivars in trials at HEL, MOS, and UM. Their list is provided by Ortiz et al. (2022) (Ortiz et al., 2020), while the cultivars are a sample of those released and grown in Europe during the last 200 years. HEL and MOS are near Kristianstad (56°01′ 46″N 14°09′24″E, Skåne, southern Sweden), while UM (63°49′30″N 20°15′50″E) is in the north of Sweden.An incomplete block design (simple lattice) with 2 replications of 10 plants each was the field layout for the field trials across testing sites. Fungicides were only used in HEL to avoid late blight caused by the oomycete Phytophthora infestans throughout the growing season, thus allowing tuber yield potential to be estimated at this site. Crop husbandry was used for potato farming at each site.Total tuber yield per plot (kg), tuber weight by size (<40, 40-50, 50-60, >60 mm; kg), while tuber flesh starch was measured as a percentage based on specific gravity after harvest. Reducing sugars in the tuber flesh after harvest was determined using potato glucose strip tests (Mann et al. 1991). Host plant resistance to late blight was evaluated using the area under the disease progress curve in MOS.After sampling using 4 leaf punches for each of the 256 breeding clones and cultivars included in the experiments, the materials were sent by AgriTech-Intertek ScanBi Diagnostics (Alnarp, Sweden) to Diversity Array Technology Pty Ltd (ACT, Australia) for targeted genotyping following a genotype-by-sequencing approach (https://www.diversityarrays.com/technology-andresources/targeted-genotyping/). More than 2,000 singlenucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) were used for genotyping. They derived mostly from SolCAP SNPs based on chromosome positions and MAF > 0.05 in germplasm from the Centro Internacional de la Papa (CIP, Lima, Perú) and the United States of America. According to Selga et al. (2021), such a number of SNPs seems to be enough for researching GEBVs without losing information. Although there were very few missing genotyping data (0.1%), one breeding clone (97) and 2 cultivars (\"Leyla\" and \"Red Lady\") were not included further in the analysis because they were lacking enough SNP data.We briefly described the method used for codifying the molecular X matrix proposed by Slater et al. (2016) and used one of the options used by Ortiz et al. (2022) in the genomic-enabled prediction models.For coding matrix X, according to Slater et al. (2016), we considered additive and nonadditive effects in a full tetrasomic polyploid assuming each genotype, has its own effect. In this case, there were 5 possible (AAAA, AAAB, AABB, ABBB, BBBB) effects per SNP marker, coding 0, and 1, for the absence or presence of the genotype, respectively, in each of the 5 cases. For each SNP marker, exists 5 columns on X coding the presence or absence of the genotype. Then the genomic relationship between individuals j, k was computed aswhere M was the number of markers × 5, x ji represents the code of the absence or presence of the genotype from column ith of individual jth, and p i is the frequency of each genotype, i.e. the frequency in each column. To compute the diagonal of this matrix, we used:The standard reaction norm model incorporating GE (Jarquín et al. 2014), as shown below, explains the variation of the observations of a ST in each of the m environments (ME) represented by the vector y = (y ′ 1 , . . . , y ′ i , . . . y ′ m ) ′ by estimating each mean of the environment observations μ E , plus the prediction of the main genetic effects g and the prediction of the interaction random effects G × E represented by vector ge, the unexplained variation or random errors are represented by vector ɛ.where y is a column vector of size n T × 1, Considering n T as the sum of the number of observations in each environment. The incidence matrix Z E relates the observations to the mean of the environments. The random genetic vector of main effects g follows a multivariate normal distribution N(0, σ 2 g Z g KZ ′ g ) where σ 2 g is the variance component of g, Z g is an incidence matrix that relates the observations with the K matrix of genomic relations between the clones. In our study, K was computed as previously indicated for the case of a full tetrasomic genomic relationship matrix. The random vector of interaction effects ge follows a multivariate nor-, where σ 2 ge is the variance component, # denotes the Hadamard product, and E is a matrix of relationship between environments (in our case, an identity matrix is considered) such that Z E EZ ′ E is a block diagonal matrix with 1 s for all pairs of observations in the same environment and 0 s otherwise. This implies that the estimation of the effects ge is independent in each environment. Random errors ε are considered with homogeneous variance, that is, ε ∼ N(0, σ 2 ε I). This model is flexible because it allows predicting different numbers of clones in different environments or even predicting the entire environment. However, when the correlations between the environments are not positive, the GE model with the Hadamard product does not explain the phenotype variation well enough (Lopez-Cruz et al. 2015), because the model does not incorporate genomic covariances between environments.Based on Burgueño et al. (2012), the GP model including GE considered the genomic covariances between environments to attempt improving the GP accuracy of unobserved environments. In M2, we considered only one trait (ST) and MEs, but the main effect of genomic and the GE interaction effects are modeled jointly by using a single vector u assuming a multivariate normal distribution that considers the genomic covariances between environments. One form of this model iswhere the genetic random effects can be modeled as a normal dis-where U E is a matrix of genomic covariances between the environments of size m × m to be estimated, and ⊗ indicates the Kronecker product. The random errors are modeled as ε ∼ N(0, Σ ⊗ I), where matrix Σ is a diagonal matrix of size m × m, that has on its diagonal the variances of the errors between environments to be estimated, and I is the identity matrix of order n L × n L (Cuevas et al. 2017), where n L denotes the number of lines or clones in each environment (for balance data).Although model M2 is powerful when considering the genetic covariances between environments, it cannot predict full environments because it does not have a way of estimating the corresponding genomic covariances of those environments in the training sites with those in the testing sites where no data have been collected.Cuevas et al. (2017) showed that adding a random vector to M2 to account for the cultivar variation across environments that was accounted for by vector u, could increase the prediction accuracy.Here, we considered a ST measured in different environments (ME) to construct and add a random vector f to M2, that isThen a random vector f is added that is independent from u, and ε, and that has a normal distribution f ∼ N(0, F E ⊗ I), where F E is a matrix of environmental covariances of size m × m to be estimated, ⊗ indicates the Kronecker product, and matrix I represents the identity matrix. Note that the vector f allows predicting the nonadditive effects (or a proportion) for possible covariances that were not modeled in K. Model M3, like M2, allows improving the prediction accuracy of model M1, when the covariances (or correlations) of the observations between environments are negative or close to zero. Like M2, M3 could not be used to predict complete environments because, technically, it could not estimate covariances between related environments with the environments to be predicted because of the lack of data on the environments to be predicted.Note that M2 could be adopted to be a single environment MT (MT-SE) aswhere the vectors Z T μ T are similar to those of M2, that is, the μ T is a vector that represents the means of the t traits, and the incidence matrix Z T relates the observations with the mean of the traits, but now the number of cultivars is the same for each trait so that if we order the phenotypic observations of the first trait, then the second trait and so forth,then the genetic random effects can be modeled as a normal distribution u ∼ N(0, U T ⊗ K), where U T is a matrix of genomic covariances between the traits of size t × t to be estimated, and ⊗ indicates the Kronecker product. The matrix K represents the relationships between the genotypes built with molecular markers.The random errors are modeled as ε ∼ N(0, Σ ⊗ I), where the diagonal matrix Σ is a matrix of size t × t, expressing the covariances of the errors to be estimated; and I is the identity matrix of order n L × n L . This model MT-SE can also be represented as a multiresponse model, that is, instead of representing the observations as a vector, they can be arranged in a matrix so that M2 can be rewritten aswhere Y is a matrix of order n L × t that represents the phenotypic values ordered in such a way that the columns contain the data for each trait and the rows contain the data for each line or genotype. The intercepts or means of each trait are represented by a vector μ of size t × 1. The matrix of genetic random effects assumes that they follow a multivariate multiresponse normal distribution u ∼ MN nL×t (0, K, U T ). The random errors assume a multivariate multiresponse normal distribution ε ∼ MN nLxt (0, I, Σ).As already mentioned, when MT data are available, the models to be used are those that account for correlations between phenotypic traits because when the degree of correlation is moderate or large, this could increase the GP accuracy. The model, based on the Bayesian MT kernel of Montesinos-López et al. (2022), can be seen as the combination of the MT model 2a and the reaction norm G × E M1 for ME. Then M4 is represented aswhere the matrix Y is of size n T × t ordered in such a way that the columns represent the phenotypic values of each of the t traits and the rows are the lines or genotypes, ordered first by environments, and then by lines. The vector μ is of size t × 1 and it represents the intercept or mean of each trait. The matrix Z E is an incidence matrix of the environments of size n T × m, and μ E is a matrix of order m × t with the means of each environment in each trait. The matrix g is of order n T × t and follows a normal distribution g ∼ MN nT×t (0, Z g KZ ′ g , U g ), where Z g is an incidence matrix of the genotypes of order n T × n L , K is the relationship matrix of the genotypes of size n L × n L and U g is a variance-covariance matrix of main effects between the traits. The matrix ge is of order n T × t and follows a normal distribution ge ∼ MN nTxt (0,, where # is the Hadamard product and U ge is a variance-covariance matrix of interaction effects between the traits. Random errors are represented by the matrix ɛ of order n T × t that follows a normal distribution ε ∼ MN nTxt (0, I, Σ t ), where the identity matrix I is of dimension n T × n T .The GP accuracy of the different models can be assessed by means of several different validation schemes. The first validation scheme (predicts 100% of the cultivars next year) uses the traits from each of the 3 locations in 2020 (HEL, MOS, and UM) to predict all the values of the traits in each of the 3 locations in 2021 (HEL, MOS, and UM). The second validation scheme (predicts 70% next year) uses all the data from 2020 plus 30% of the value of the traits in 3 locations in 2021 to predict 70% (prediction set) of the value of the traits at the 3 locations in 2022; this second case was established with 10 groups or random samples.The acronyms used for identifying models M1-M4, ST (S) or MT (M) and prediction set comprising the prediction of all cultivars in each location during 2021 (a), or the prediction of a percentage of cultivars in each location during 2021 (p) are given in Table 1. A graphical explanation of the different combinations of models (M1-M4), considering 2 prediction sets (100 and 70%), and ST or MT cross-validation schemes for assessing the GP prediction accuracy of the models is shown in Fig. 1 for 10 hypothetical cultivars evaluated in HEL, MOS, and UM in 2020 to predict HEL in 2021. The only MT model is M4, whereas ST models are M1, M2, and M3.As shown in Fig. 1, the first cross-validations refer to 2 cases including models M1 and M4 for predicting all the values (100%) for each trait in location HEL 2021 using as a training set all the values for each trait in each location from 2020. Model M1 is an ST (traits are separated by black lines), whereas M4 is an MT model (traits are not separated). For these 2 cases, the given acronyms join (1) the model (M1-M4), (2) the ST or MT (S or M) prediction, and (3) include the prediction of all (100%) the lines in HEL 2021 and denoted by \"a,\" that is, M1Sa and M4Ma. The third and fourth crossvalidation schemes delineated by red lines included models M1, M2, and M3 for ST and model M4 for MT, and they predict 70% of the values of each trait in HEL 2021, using as training set values of the trait in each location from 2020, but also adding 30% of the values from HEL 2021 to the prediction set in the training set. As already mentioned, this prediction of 70% is performed 10 times using the 10 random samples for extracting 30% of the values of the prediction set (2021) and adding them to the training set (2020). The same 10 random samples were used for comparing the GP accuracy of the 4 models.The names of each of these model-prediction types and sizes are M1Sp, M2Sp, M3Sp, and M4Mp where the letter \"p\" refers to the percentage of the prediction set (70%). Note that for these 4 cases, 3 cultivars (out of 10) are missing in all the traits (Fig. 1). The fifth cross-validation scheme had MT M4 that predicts 70% of the cultivars in HEL in 2021 for all traits, but now, the crossvalidations between the traits and locations for HEL 2021 are different from those in the previous case (M4Mp) where some cultivars are observed in some traits and locations but not observed in other traits and locations. This cross-validation scheme is refereed to M4Mp*. Note that in this case, some cultivars are missing in some traits but not in other traits; for example, cultivars 1, 2, and 3 are not observed for the weight of tubers below 40 mm, but are observed for the weight of 40 − 50 mm tubers (Fig. 1).We used 2 metrics for comparing the genomic-enabled prediction accuracy of the different models (M1, M2, M3, and M4). One metric is the Pearson correlation coefficient (COR) between the observed and predicted values, whereas the second metric is the prediction mean squared error (PMSE) of the different prediction models.In this study, we used 3 genomic models (M1, M2, and M3) that predict one ST and various environments (ME). The first model M1 is the ST conventional reaction norm model that considers the genomic main effect and interaction effects with homogeneous variance for the environmental random errors. Model M2 considers together the genomic effects and heterogenous environmental variance error. Note that model M3 adds a random vector to M2 with the aim of capturing some nonadditive genetic effects that were not previously explained. Finally, model M4 includes MTs as multiresponse and MEs.Two main prediction scenarios were analyzed: (1) use models M1 and M2 to predict all potato cultivars for each of the 3 locations in 2021 where the training were the locations in 2020, and (2) using all 4 models to predict 70% of the potato cultivars of each location in 2021, and incorporating 30% of the prediction set in the training set. Note that we used acronyms to identify the model (M1-M4), the ST (S) or MT (M ), and the size of the prediction set, all cultivar (a) or a percentage (p) (Table 1, Fig. 1).Phenotypic correlations were computed for traits in each location (HEL, MOS, and UM) in 2021 (prediction set, PS) with those traits observed in the locations of the previous year (HEL, MOS, and UM in 2020; Table 2). The PS contains 7 traits (5 tuber weight traits and 2 tuber flesh quality characteristics) in each of the 3 locations of 2021 using the locations and traits of the previous year, 2020. The M1-M4 ST or MT prediction models for predicting all cultivars or a proportion of cultivars (all cultivars or 70%) are combined in the following acronyms: M1Sa, M4Ma, M1Sp, M2Sp, M3Sp, M4Mp, and M4Mp* (Tables 3-5 and Figs. 2-4). shown in Tables 3-5 and displayed in Figs. 2-4; i.e. the mean prediction accuracy estimates are higher for the cases when the phenotypic correlations between years were higher as was the case for starch. In these cases, where the phenotypic correlations between traits for the 2 years were high, the mean prediction accuracy between the models did not show significant differences. Furthermore, when the phenotypic correlations between locations are moderate, as for example for reducing sugars, the accuracy of the model's predictions did not show significant differences (Figs. 2-4). On the contrary, when the phenotypic correlations were negative or near zero, as for example, for the weight of 50-60 mm tubers for HEL 2021 (Fig. 2), the prediction accuracy estimates were low in the models except for M3Sp and M4Mp*. Similar results were observed for the weight of 40-50 mm tubers at HEL 2021 (Fig. 2) and UM 2021 (Fig. 4), where models M3Sp and M4Mp* had better predictions than models M1Sa and M1Sp, which showed lower predictions when the phenotypic correlations were close to zero or negatives. Table 2. Phenotypic correlations of each trait at HEL in 2021 with each trait at HEL 2020, MOS 2020, and Umeå (UM) 2020. Overall, the model showing the best prediction accuracy was M4Sp* closely followed by model M3Sp. However, the differences were higher when the phenotypic correlations between the locations were near zero or negative.Genomic predictions including all cultivars in HEL 2021 were the best for tuber flesh starch in all the models, whose GP accuracy estimates were above 0.85 (Table 3 and Fig. 2). Most of the 4 models had a very similar GP accuracy for starch; i.e. ranging from 0.852 (M2Sp and M4Mp) to 0.877 (M3Sp) (Table 3, Fig. 2).The second trait with an important GP accuracy shown by most of the models was the weight of 60 mm tubers. The MT model predicting a proportion of cultivars (M4Mp*) had the highest prediction accuracy (0.730, Table 3) and a ST conventional reaction norm model for predicting that all cultivars (M1Sa) had the lowest GP accuracy (0.627). The weight of tubers below 40 mm and the total tuber weight had a very similar GP accuracy except for the MT model M4Mp*, which was the worst model for the weight of tubers below 40 mm but the best model for total tuber weight. Excluding M4Mp*, the predictions ranged from 0.525 (<40 mm, M4Ma) to 0.623 (<40 mm M3Sp) for both traits. The best predictive model was M3Sp for the weight of tubers below 40 mm and M1Sa for total tuber weight (Fig. 2). Weight with 40-50 mm tubers and 50-60 mm tubers had the lowest prediction accuracy for most models except M3Sp (Fig. 2). Comparing the models with ST and MT, M3Sp was the best ST model for tuber weight below 40 mm and between 50 and 60 mm, and tuber flesh starch, whereas M4Mp* was best for weights of 40-50 mm and above 60 mm tubers, as well as for the total tuber weight.In summary, prediction of the 7 traits at HEL in 2021 shows that traits with a higher phenotypic correlation between location HEL 2021 and those at HEL, MOS, and UM in 2020 are tuber flesh starch and most of the tuber weights (except the weight of 50-60 mm tubers). In terms of GP accuracy, the MT model predicting 70% of the cultivars for some traits while observing others (M4Mp*) was the best for weight 40-50 mm tubers or above 60 mm tubers, and total tuber weight, and very similar to those for tuber flesh starch. Model M3Sp was the best GP for the weight of tubers below 40 mm and 50-60 mm, as well as for tuber flesh starch.The phenotypic correlation of traits measured in location MOS in 2020-2021 is given in Table 2. For all the traits, phenotypic correlations between traits in MOS for 2021 and 2020 were higher than those between MOS 2021 and the 2 other locations (HEL and UM) in 2020. Tuber flesh starch had the highest phenotypic correlation between MOS 2021and HEL, MOS, and UM 2020 (0.83, 0.89, and 0.72, respectively) followed by the weight of tubers above 60 mm (0.73, 0.74, and 0.62, respectively), total tuber weight (0.64, 0.74, and 0.52, respectively), and the weight of tubers below 40 mm (0.65, 0.64, and 0.55, respectively).Overall GP accuracy in MOS 2021 was higher than in HEL 2021. Tuber flesh starch was the best-predicted trait for all the models with GP accuracy below 0.85 (Table 4 and Fig. 3). Most of the 4 models showed a very similar GP accuracy for tuber flesh starch M3Sp is the prediction accuracy from model M3 (ST GE M2 extended to include a random vector that more efficiently utilizes the environmental covariances) when predicting 70% of each trait in 2021; M4Mp is the prediction accuracy from model M4 when predicting 70% of each trait in 2021, M4Mp* is the prediction accuracy from model M4 when predicting 70% of each trait in 2021, in which, some cultivars are observed in some traits. When predicting 70%, the mean and the standard deviations (SDs) from the 10-fold cross-validation are given in parentheses.but ST M2 and M3 predicting 70% of the cultivars (M2Sp and M3Sp) were the best genomic predictors, with 0.866 and 0.867, respectively. Models M1 and M4 predicting all potato cultivars (M1Sa and M4Ma) were slightly below in terms of prediction accuracy (0.847 and 0.848, respectively).The second trait with important GP accuracy shown by most of the models was the weight of tubers above 60 mm with M4Mp* with an accuracy of 0.817, followed byM1Sa having an accuracy of 0.791, followed by M3Sp with 0.790 (Table 4). Overall, the total tuber weight irrespective of size, ranked third based on GP accuracy, with model M4Mp* having a prediction accuracy of 0.808, followed by M3Sp with 0.758 prediction accuracy, followed by M2Sp (0.750). The weight of tubers below 40 mm had relatively high GP accuracy, with models M2Sp and M3Sp being the best with 0.717 and 0.714 of GP accuracy, respectively. Finally, the weight of 50-60 mm tubers had lower prediction accuracy than the previously mentioned traits, with the best predictor models being M4Mp*-whose GP accuracy was 0.711-followed by M2Sp and M3Sp (GP accuracy = 0.660).The GP accuracy estimates for the 7 traits in MOS during 2021 were slightly higher than those at HEL 2021. The traits with higher phenotypic correlations between MOS 2021 and those at HEL, MOS, and UM in 2020 were tuber flesh starch, the weight of tubers above 60 mm and below 40 mm, total tuber weight, and the weight of 50-60 mm tuber. Overall, the best models for predicting most of the 7 traits were the ST models M2 and M3 predicting 70% of the potato cultivars in each location (M3Sp and M2Sp), except for traits such as the weight of 50-60 mm and above 60 mm tubers, and the total tuber weight in which, the MT model M4Mp* was the best GP model.Table 2 lists the phenotypic correlation of traits measured at UM in 2020-2021. For all the traits, the phenotypic correlations between traits in UM for 2021 and 2020 are higher than those between UM 2021 and other locations (HEL and MOS) in 2020. The traits with the highest phenotypic correlation between UM 2021 and HEL, MOS, and UM 2020 were the weight of 50-60 mm, below 40 mm, and above 60 mm tubers, followed by tuber flesh starch.Overall, the GP accuracy in UM 2021 was lower than those of HEL and MOS in 2021. The weight of 50-60 mm and below 40 mm tubers were the best-predicted traits for all the models in UM 2021 (Table 5 and Fig. 4). The best GP model for all the traits, except reducing sugars and starch in the tuber flesh, was M4Mp*. ST and MT models predicting 70% of the cultivars (M3Sp and M4Mp) had the best GP accuracy for predicting traits of tuber flesh sugar and starch, respectively.Most of the 4 models showed similar GP accuracy for these 2 traits, but M2Sp had a GP accuracy of 0.688 for the weight of 50-60 mm tubers, and model M4Mp had an accuracy of 0.633 for the weight of tubers below 40 mm. Models M2Sp and M3Sp had a GP accuracy of around 0.578 for the weight of tubers above 60 mm that ranked third on overall GP accuracy (Table 5) followed by tuber flesh starch, with model M3Sp being the best with (prediction accuracy = 0.483), followed by M2Sp (0.481). research (Crossa et al. 2021). The integration and exploitation of several big data sets are necessary, and the use of appropriate statistical machine-learning models has become important for modern breeding.When performing research on GS and GP accuracy, several problems become important; one is the inclusion of statistical machine-learning methods and models that include GE interaction. Another problem to be assessed is the addition of several traits for prediction rather than only one trait, and another issue is the methods used for comparing the GP accuracy of several traits using several models and various possible cross-validation schemes to develop a GP accuracy metric. Several options exist for investigating the GS accuracy for predicting the breeding value of cultivars that have been genotyped with genome-wide molecular markers. One scenario is predicting the performance of a proportion of cultivars (e.g. 70%) that have not yet been observed in any of the testing environments (usually location-year combinations); another option is to predict all cultivars (i.e. 100%) observed in all the environments except one (leave one environment out).Another scenario is predicting cultivars that were observed in some environments but not in others.In this study, predictions for these scenarios have been done using ST (M1, M2, and M3) and MT (M4) models. These ST and MT models combined with different prediction testing scenarios are described in Table 1 and graphically displayed in a small example in Fig. 1, where several proportions of the PS have been combined with the 4 different models. We included the predictions of all cultivars in 1 entire site-year combination or the prediction of a proportion of cultivars (70%) using the other 30% as TS together with the previous year. We found that for the majority of the traits in each location-year combination to be predicted (HEL, MOS, UM in 2021) M4 (MT), with a proportion of potato cultivars evaluated (30%) in some location-year combinations M4Mp* (Fig. 1) but not observed in other location-year combinations, was found to be the best predictive model, usually followed by ST models M3Sp and M2Sp.Results of this study demonstrate that for predicting traits in HEL 2021 using all environments in 2020, the superiority of the MT prediction method M4Mp* over the mean GP accuracy of the other 6 prediction methods including ST and MT for predicting the entire PS (100%) or 70% for traits tuber weights 40-50 mm, above 60 mm and total in this location were 65, 14, and 24%, respectively. However, this superiority of the MT over ST methods was not so when comparing M4Ma or M4Mp with other ST methods, especially for M3Sp for traits tuber weight <40 mm, 50-60 mm, and tuber flesh starch. Results for predicting traits at MOS in 2021 using all environments in 2020 show the superiority of the MT prediction method M4Mp* for 4 tuber weight traits and 1 tuber flesh quality characteristic over all the other 6 methods. The GP accuracy of method M4Mp* overcame the mean GP accuracy of all the other 6 methods by 10, 9, 4, 8, and 4% for the weight of 40-50 mm, 50-60 mm, above 60 mm tubers, total tuber weight and tuber flesh sugar, respectively. Similar results were obtained for the prediction of location UM in 2021 using the TS comprising HEL, MOS, and UM from 2020; the best GP accuracy method for all 5 tuber weight traits was method M4Mp* over the mean GP accuracy of all the other 6 methods by 7, 24, 12, 8, and 26% for tuber weights below 40 mm, 40-50 mm, 50-60 mm, above 60 mm and total tuber weight, respectively.Previous research noticed variable prediction accuracy that depends on factors such as heritability of the trait, size of TP, relatedness of PS and TS, statistical machine-learning models, marker density, linkage disequilibrium, and the incorporation of GE interactions in the prediction models. In a recent article, Semagn et al. (2022) compared the predictive abilities of wheat cultivars that have not been evaluated for an ST, not evaluated for MTs (MT1), and evaluated for some traits but not others (MT2) using agronomy and disease traits. Note that the partition of Semagn's MT1 is similar to the partitions of Sp (M1, M2, and M3) and Mp (M4) in this study, whereas the partitions of Semagn's MT2 are similar to that of M4Mp*. Semagn et al. (2022) found that the GP accuracy of MT2 (method M4Mp* in this study) increased over ST and other model-partitions in all traits from 9 to 82%. This occurred because, under the prediction scheme MT2 of Semagn et al. (2022), it is possible to exchange information between traits like method M4Mp* that allows borrowing of information between traits and also between environments, and thus, to efficiently use the available information in one single model combined with an appropriate prediction scheme.This demonstrated the high potential for improving prediction accuracies and the high potential of the MT models for improving prediction accuracy, thus offering researchers the opportunity to predict traits that were not observed, due to possible difficulties or because they are expensive to measure under certain environmental constraints (Semagn et al. 2022).Genomic prediction in potatoes is still in the early research stages before using it for routine breeding of this highly heterozygous tetrasomic polyploid tuberous crop with vegetative propagation (Ortiz et al. 2022, and references therein). The use of MT and ME models for GP in this research led to the highest accuracy for tuber yield and tuber flesh starch as per available literature. Tuber flesh starch, which is often estimated from specific gravity measurements, is a very highly heritable trait (Bradshaw 2021;Ortiz et al. 2021) that is affected very little by the GEs (Killick and Simmonds 1974), thus explaining the high prediction accuracy noted in this and research elsewhere. The high prediction accuracy noted in this, and previous research suggests that developing GEBV modeling in potatoes for tuber flesh starch does not require a very large training population, but it seems that just a few hundred (including both breeding clones and released cultivars that are relevant to the breeding program and covering a broad range of trait variation) may suffice.Genotype × environment interactions may significantly affect tuber yield, but the use of ME GP allows identifying promising germplasm in both crossing blocks (Ortiz et al. 2022) in potato breeding. The significantly high correlations noted when using MT, ME modeling suggest that GP may also be useful for the potato cultivar development pipeline even when using small breeding populations (Selga et al. 2022). Every year, F 1 seeds (resulting from crossing heterozygous parents) are planted in individual pots in a greenhouse, and one tuber (the best in size) for each plant is taken at harvest. Thus, thousands of tubers derived from these F 1 hybrid seeds are produced for further field testing in single plant plots during the first year. At harvest, all plants are dug up to assess their tuber number, size, shape, color, appearance, and health, which are used as the selection criteria for obtaining the next breeding generation for further testing the next year. After selection in early clonal generations [first (T 1 ), second (T 2 ), and often third (T 3 )], the aim is to have about a few dozens for field testing from the fourth generation onward and ending with a few promising breeding clones after the seventh year of field testing and selection to include them in MT trials in the target population of environments. The GP accuracy over the 2 years within each site suggests that it will be possible to select (based on GEBV models) in early generation trials for each target population of environments. Furthermore, as per previous GP accuracy estimates (Ortiz et al. 2022;Selga et al. 2022) and these results, it seems that GEBV for selection will be useful from T 3 onward, rather than in T 1 or even in T 2 . Hence, as shown herein, genomic selection appears to be feasible in potato breeding when using elite-bred germplasm.The ST model M3Sp was the best genomic predicted, followed by M1Sp and M1Sa at HEL in 2021. In terms of MT GP accuracy, M4Mp* was the best for the weight of 40-50 mm and above 60 mm tubers, and total tuber weight irrespective of size, and very similar to tuber flesh starch. The GP accuracy of the 7 traits at MOS in 2021 indicated that the best models for predicting the majority of the 7 traits were ST M3Sp and M2Sp, except for the weight of 50-60 mm tubers, above 60 mm tubers, and total tuber weight, where the MT model M4Mp* was the best GP model. The traits with higher phenotypic correlations between location UM 2021 and those at HEL, MOS, and UM in 2020 are the weight of tubers with the following sizes: 50-60 mm, below 40 mm, and above 60 mm. The best model method for predicting the majority of the 7 traits was MT M4Mp* because it allows the exchange of information between traits and environments followed by M3Sp and M2Sp, which efficiently used information between environments. According to Cuevas et al. (2017), M3Sp producing better or similar GP accuracy than M2Sp was expected.","tokenCount":"7865"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0515709861.json b/data/part_2/0515709861.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..df639e5662d841aac5408faecf93b480883a9c36 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0515709861.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"04637c600fa27a670ff7bca936686f21","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/feceaf69-cec0-424d-81e5-d5168637e977/retrieve","id":"61067092"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"9fdee72b-9643-4c57-a7d5-871e33bf162f","pagecount":"63","content":"La mécanisation agricole est l'emploi des machines dans le secteur agricole pour la production végétale, animale, halieutique, la transformation et le transport des produits agricoles.En résumé, c'est la substitution des opérations manuelles par celles des machines, pour réduire la pénibilité du travail et accroitre la productivité et la qualité des produits.C'est la substitution de la force humaine ou animale par un moteur (thermique, électrique, hydraulique, éolien, etc.).Il faut noter que la mécanisation n'est pas que la motorisation. La culture attelée est une forme de mécanisation.Les machines agricoles désignent l'ensemble du matériel (équipements) utilisé dans le domaine de l'agriculture pour les productions végétale, animale et halieutique et pour la transformation des produits agricoles.Une machine agricole est un équipement pouvant produire, transformer, communiquer un mouvement, effectuer un travail ou produire un effet (chaleur, froid, etc.) pour accroître la productivité.L'unité motrice est une source d'énergie mécanique (qui produit de la force) destinée à mettre en mouvement une machine ou mécanisme.Il s'agit entre autres de : l'homme, l'animal, le moteur (thermique, électrique), le tracteur, le motoculteur, l'automoteur. Permettre à l'apprenant de comprendre comment la construction métallique est fondamentalement la base du métier de fabricant d'équipements agricoles post récoltes.La construction métallique est un domaine de la mécanique qui s'intéresse à la fabrication des pièces, équipements et ouvrages en métal. Autrement dit, c'est le domaine de la transformation des métaux.Le fer et ses alliages sont très utilisés dans la construction métallique. C'est la matière première de l'artisan en construction métallique. Mais aussi, les métaux non ferreux et leurs alliages tels que le cuivre et l'aluminium sont très utilisés.Les propriétés mécaniques très variées des métaux permettent de multiples utilisations pour la fabrication de pièces, ouvrages et objets d'usage courant, tels que les petits instruments usuels, des machines et les grands ouvrages (charpentes, ponts, bateaux, etc.).L'artisan en construction métallique est un technicien qui travail les métaux par diverses techniques pour fabriquer des ouvrages. Il réalise des opérations de montage de pièces et d'ouvrages métalliques diverses au moyen d'outils, de machines et des techniques spécifiques.Les artisans formés auront la capacité de concevoir, de réaliser des équipements de transformation de produits agricoles et d'assurer leur maintenance (moulin, batteuse, broyeur, presse, râpeuse, etc.). Ils pourront de même intervenir sur divers équipements de production (charrues, herses, etc.). De façon spécifique à l'issue de cette formation, ils seront à même de fabriquer divers objets et ouvrages métalliques (table, porte, fenêtre, chaise, armoire, abreuvoir, mangeoires) et des gros ouvrages (charpente, citerne, tank, etc.).Pour Permettre à l'apprenant de connaitre l'état du secteur de la production des équipements post récoltes au Bénin. De se faire une idée synoptique du secteur, les progrès réalisés et surtout les défis à relever.Le secteur de la transformation post récolte des produits agricoles est en plein développement au Bénin. Mais la croissance de la production et le besoin croissant des populations en produits agricoles transformés de qualité mettent le secteur face à un grand défi à relever. A savoir :-La réduction des pertes post récoltes -La réduction de la pénibilité du travail -La disponibilité de produits plus diversifiés, en quantité, de qualité et à des couts accessibles Ainsi, le sous-secteur de la production d'équipements de transformation des produits agricoles doit contribuer à relever ce défi par une production d'équipements de qualité.Le process ou procédé de transformation des produits agricoles est la succession des étapes, activités et opérations à suivre partant de la matière première (produit brut) jusqu'à l'obtention du produit fini.La machinerie post récolte est l'ensemble des machines ou équipements de transformation utilisé dans le secteur de la transformation des produits agricoles.Les perspectives du secteur de la production des équipements post récoltes, visent à contribuer à :-Améliorer substantiellement le plateau technique de production des machines de production et la disponibilité de machines de transformation de qualité Assurer à l'apprenant un minimum de connaissances en mécanique. Ceci devrait lui permettre de mieux maitriser l'environnement technique dans lequel il opère. Ces connaissances doivent aussi lui permettre de faire de petits calculs et de raisonner des choix techniques. Aperçu de quelques formes géométriques et leurs propriétés (Dimension, surface, volume) Les formes de représentations techniques des pièces sont : En mécanique pour réaliser des ouvrages, mécanismes, machines, on procède à l'assemblage de divers éléments ou pièces. Assemblage ne nécessitant aucune pièce intermédiaire. Exemple : Soudage, sertissage. Les mouvements se transmettent par interaction des pièces entre elles. Ainsi, la transmission est le fait d'entraîner ou de communiquer un mouvement d'une pièce (source) à une autre (réceptrice).On distingue deux formes de transmission de mouvement :- Les systèmes de transformation de mouvement permettent d'adapter le mouvement à l'utilisation visée. Ils ont pour objectifs de :changer la direction du mouvement changer l'intensité de l'effort (force ou couple) changer la vitesse rendre le système irréversible La force pour mettre en mouvement les différents objets ou mécanismes sont de différentes sources : musculaire (homme, animaux), moteurs : thermique, hydraulique, pneumatique, électrique, etc.Les organes ou pièces mécaniques utilisés dans les mécanismes de transmission sont entre autres : Poulie, roue dentée, pignon, crémaillère, vis sans fin, chaine, courroie, came/excentrique, articulation, roue et pièce de friction (avec garniture), bielle, poussoirs.Le tableau ci-dessous illustre quelques systèmes ou mécanismes de transformation de mouvements : La transmission par poulies-courroie est un système de transmission de mouvement de rotation entre deux arbres distants l'un de l'autre par l'intermédiaire de deux poulies (au moins) solidaires aux arbres et entrainées par une courroie. Elle permet de transformer le mouvement initial (vitesses, inversion de sens, position des arbres, etc.).C'est une solution simple et économique de transmission, présentant de nombreux avantages lorsqu'il n'y a pas une nécessité de synchronisation entre les arbres (simple d'entretien, silencieux, vitesse élevée, pas de lubrification, entre axe variable, etc.).- La transmission par roues dentées-chaîne est un système de transmission de mouvement de rotation entre deux arbres parallèles distants l'un de l'autre par l'intermédiaire de deux roues dentées (au moins) solidaires aux arbres et entrainées par une chaine.Elle permet transmettre des puissances plus élevées par rapport à la transmission par courroie, de transformer le mouvement initial (vitesse) et sans glissement (mouvements synchrones).La transmission par engrenage est un type de transmission de mouvement Connaitre les métaux et leurs propriétés mécaniques, leur utilisation, et maitriser les techniques de fabrication (formage), l'utilisation des outils et savoir choisir les techniques les plus adaptés aux contextes.Dans le métier de construction métallique, les métaux utilisés sont : le fer, le fer inox, le fer galvanisé, l'aluminium, le cuivre et leurs alliages. C'est un travail qui consiste à transformer les tôles et les profilés en diverses formes d'ouvrages.Ainsi, les matières premières dans la construction métallique sont essentiellement les tôles et profilés en acier, en inox (acier inoxydable), en aluminium, en fers galvanisés et en cuivre (pas très courant).-Résistant (résiliant) -Soudable -Malléable (déformable, pliable) -Résistance à la rouille La construction métallique repose sur plusieurs spécialités dont : la chaudronnerie, la soudure, la fabrication mécanique (ajustage, usinage, etc.), forge, etc.Le technicien est donc appelé à maitriser les connaissances de ses spécialités.Le chaudronnier fabrique des ouvrages (équipements) à partir des feuilles, tubes et profilés de métaux comme l'acier, l'inox, l'aluminium, le cuivre, etc.Le travail de chaudronnerie se réalise en plusieurs étapes :-Etude de l'ouvrage à réaliser : la réalisation commence par le dessin. Ce qui permet d'évaluer les besoins en matière et matériel de travail ; -Traçage : il consiste à dessiner des pièces à plat sur la matière (développante des formes) avant de passer à la phase de découpage à l'aide de (gabarit) ou directement sur la matière ; -Découpage : des composantes de l'objet à réaliser sont découpées par diverses techniques par chalumeau, scie, cisaille, ciseaux, burin, tronçonneuse, etc. ; -Mise en forme (formage) : les composantes sont mises en forme par différents procédés : pliage, cintrage, roulage, emboutissage, estampages, etc. -Assemblage : les composantes son assemblées par diverses techniques : soudure, rivetage, vissage/boulonnage, agrafage, etc. Dans les assemblages, interviennent aussi les opérations d'ajustage, perçage, filetage, taraudage, meulage, etc. Le découpage est une opération qui consiste à obtenir des morceaux de matière ou pièces prélevés dans une masse plus grande. Le découpage se fait par diverses techniques, telles que : le poinçonnage, le sciage, le cisaillement, au chalumeau, à la meule, au laser, etc. ; Cette technique utilise des appareils électriques (générateur ou poste à souder) à courant électrique alternatif (220 ou 380 volts) ou continu (110 volts) pour produire l'énergie (la chaleur) nécessaire à la fusion du métal.Le principe de base est de conserver un écartement constant entre l'électrode et la pièce à souder afin de créer un arc électrique.-Si l'électrode touche la pièce, il ne se produira pas de fort dégagement de chaleur et l'électrode collera à la pièce.-Si, l'électrode est trop éloignée de la pièce, le passage d'électricité ne se fera pas et il n'y aura pas d'étincelle.Il faut veiller à choisir des électrodes de bonne qualité, de diamètre adapté. -Régler l'intensité du poste en fonction de la pièce à souder ; -Préparer les pièces : nettoyer au papier abrasif, et dégraisser les surfaces à souder et faire des chanfreins sur les pièces pour recevoir le cordon de soudure au besoin, -Mettre en contact les pièces à souder et les fixer au besoin avec un serre-joint ou étau afin de bien les immobiliser ; -Placer l'ensemble sur un support ininflammable et fixer la pince de masse sur la pièce à souder ; -Fixer l'électrode dans le porte-électrode du poste ; -Amorcer l'arc (frotter la pointe de l'électrode sur la pièce pour créer les étincelles) ; -Éloigner l'électrode de quelques millimètres afin de créer l'arc ; -Déplacer régulièrement l'électrode au-dessus de la zone à souder afin de réaliser un cordon de soudure ; -Laisser refroidir les pièces à la fin de l'opération -Couper le poste et le débrancher au besoin -L'opération terminée ; Cette technique de soudure utilise un générateur constitué de deux bouteilles de gaz dont l'une contient de l'oxygène et l'autre l'acétylène dont la brulure produit la chaleur de soudure.Indications : -La bouteille toujours marquée de rouge ou autre est celle de l'acétylène. Le raccord rouge lui est relié -La seconde est celle de l'oxygène souvent marquée de couleur bleue. Le raccord bleu lui est relié -Les deux sont reliés aux embouts du chalumeau De façon générale, une machine transformation est constituée de grands éléments ci-après :-Le châssis ou bâtis : ossature servant de support pour les autres organes ;-Le système d'alimentation : stock, régule et introduit la matière dans la zone ou dans le mécanisme de traitement ;-Le mécanisme d'opération ou de transformation : permet de réaliser la transformation qui est l'objet (la raison d'être) de la machine ;-Le système d'évacuation : permet de sortir (expulser) les produits traités de la machine ;-La chaine cinématique : génère, transforme et transmet le mouvement aux organes. Unité motrice : manivelle, pédale, moteur avec transmission (poulie-courroie, chainedents, trains d'engrenage, came, etc.).-Les organes de protection : assurent la sécurité de l'opérateur, la perte ou la dispersion des matières (produits).-Les organes de fixation ou de roulement : servent à brider (équipements fixes) ou déplacer la machine. ","tokenCount":"1830"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0539155431.json b/data/part_2/0539155431.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cec45d228bed078723231b3a7f75ef06868b005a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0539155431.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"33999a325ac56c8643d1a7fcbeb7dbc5","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/5aedd69f-4c7b-4835-861f-579f3915ba9a/retrieve","id":"449691644"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"f21840b0-e8a6-4963-9b63-0f0c2d890719","pagecount":"29","content":"Guide d'utilisation de la boîte à outils pour travailler avec les systèmes semenciers de racines, tubercules et bananes. Lima (Pérou). Programme de recherche du CGIAR sur les racines, tubercules et bananes (RTB) Guide d'utilisation RTB N° 2024-1.Annexes. GlossaireCe guide d'utilisation de la boîte à outils pour travailler avec les systèmes semenciers des racines, tubercules et bananes présente des outils pour diagnostiquer, évaluer et améliorer les systèmes semenciers de pomme de terre, de patate douce et d'igname. Dans l'ensemble, ces cultures sont appelées racines, tubercules et bananes, et elles sont cruciales pour la sécurité alimentaire et la génération de revenus, en particulier dans les pays en développement. Toutes ces cultures sont reproduites végétativement, à partir de racines, de tubercules, de tiges, de rejets ou de vignes. Ce matériel de plantation volumineux est coûteux à transporter. Les semences végétatives sont périssables et (sauf pour les pommes de terre, les ignames et quelques autres exceptions) doivent être plantées aussi fraîches que possible, et elles sont plus susceptibles de véhiculer des ravageurs et des maladies que les vraies semences. Outre ces défis uniques, les systèmes semenciers améliorés des cultures de racines, de tubercules et de bananes donnent aux agriculteurs la possibilité d'améliorer leurs moyens de subsistance en accédant à du matériel végétal de meilleure qualité provenant de variétés locales ou de variétés améliorées à haut rendement, résistantes aux stress, plus nutritives ou plus sensibles aux besoins des consommateurs.Les outils de cette boîte à outils comprennent des méthodes, des modèles, des approches et des technologies de l'information et de la communication (TIC), qui peuvent être utilisés par les chercheurs, les décideurs et les praticiens travaillant sur les systèmes semenciers des cultures de racines, de tubercules et de bananes. La section 1 de ce guide de l'utilisateur décrit l'importance d'un bon matériel de plantation, les concepts clés des systèmes semenciers, outils et de la boîte à outils, et comment ils ont été développés. La Section 2 traite des utilisateurs, des objectifs et des points d'entrée pour l'utilisation des outils du point de vue d'une chaîne de valeur des semences ou d'un cycle de projet. La Section 3 décrit le glossaire des systèmes semenciers des racines, tubercules et bananes et les 11 outils dans la boîte à outils : (1) cadre multipartite pour intervenir dans les systèmes semenciers de racines, de tubercules et de bananes ,(2) Analyse des réseaux d'impact (INA), (3) «Seed Tracker», (4) Approches et modèles intégrés pour la santé des semences, (5) Analyse de circulation de semences, (6) Étude de cas exploratoire à petite échelle, (7) Méthode des quatre carrés, (8) Analyse de chaînages cognitifs, (9) Enchères expérimentales, (10) Analyse du cadre réglementaire des semences et (11) Outil d'analyse de la durabilité des entreprises de production de semences de première génération (SEGSBAT). Chaque description comprend des exemples de questions auxquelles l'outil peut aider à répondre, ainsi que la manière dont le sexe et les groupes sociaux sont pris en compte. La Section 4 décrit les résultats attendus de l'utilisation des outils, avec des exemples de leur utilisation. La Section 5, conclusions et perspectives, traite de la formation, du soutien et de la rétroaction, ainsi que des nouveaux outils qui pourraient être inclus à l'avenir.Il y a des références bibliographiques et un bref glossaire des termes du système semencier.Ce guide d'utilisation est destiné à être utilisé avec cette page Web de la boîte à outils https://tools4seedsystems.org/, où des liens vers des informations détaillées sont disponibles, y compris des guides de l'utilisateur, des fiches descriptives, des documents de recherche et des blogs pour chaque outil.L'application des outils décrits dans ce guide de l'utilisateur vise à soutenir les interventions du système semencier qui s'efforcent de contribuer à cinq défis mondiaux dirigés par les ODD : la nutrition, la pauvreté, l'équité (inclusion), l'environnement et le changement climatique.Guide d'utilisation de la boîte à outils pour travailler avec les systèmes semenciers des racines, tubercules et bananesCe guide d'utilisation explique comment les systèmes semenciers de la banane, du manioc, de la pomme de terre, de la patate douce et de l'igname -racines, tubercules et bananes -peuvent être étudiés et améliorés à l'aide d'outils (méthodes, modèles, approches et technologies de l'information et de la communication [TIC]), qui sont regroupés dans la boîte à outils décrite ici. L'objectif est de fournir des conseils aux différents utilisateurs -chercheurs, décideurs et praticiens -dans l'utilisation des outils pour répondre aux questions clés afin de comprendre les systèmes semenciers des tubercules et des bananes, de les améliorer en menant des projets, et On peut visualiser un système semencier de différentes manières. La Figure 1 présente le système semencier en tant que chaîne de valeur semencière, avec une représentation schématique de l'ensemble des 11 outils. Il montre comment les outils fournissent des informations sur un ou plusieurs segments de la chaîne de valeur des semences. Parce qu'une chaîne de valeur semencière fonctionnelle exige que tous les segments fonctionnent bien, des outils d'intégration sont également nécessaires pour localiser les forces et les faiblesses. Des exemples de questions auxquelles les outils peuvent répondre sont décrits dans la section 3, à la fin de chaque descriptif d'outil. Un projet de système semencier comprend généralement plusieurs phases : diagnostic, conception, mise en oeuvre, suivi et analyse de scénarios (Figure 2). Chaque phase peut nécessiter différents types d'informations.Les outils présentés dans le Tableau 1 peuvent jouer un rôle à différents moments du cycle de projet. Pour suivre le changement à des fins de diagnostic, de conception, de mise en oeuvre et de suivi, des informations similaires sont collectées périodiquement. Pour l'analyse de scénarios, une approche de modélisation est généralement suivie. Quel est le taux de dégénérescence des semences conservées à la ferme ?Concevoir À quelle fréquence les agriculteurs doivent-ils acheter des semences certifiées ?Comment la qualité des semences de ferme s'est-elle améliorée avec l'utilisation périodique de semences certifiées ?Comment différentes combinaisons de semences certifiées, de résistance de l'hôte et de gestion des semences à la ferme affectent-elles le taux de dégénérescence des semences conservées à la ferme ?Une autre considération pour l'utilisation des outils est la disponibilité des ressources : temps, argent, maind'oeuvre et expertise. Certains outils nécessitent des connaissances spécialisées et d'autres sont plus faciles à appliquer. Une collecte de données extensive augmente généralement les coûts et le temps nécessaire pour traiter et analyser les données. Ces considérations sont prises en compte dans les fiches descriptives des outils disponibles sur le site web décrit ci-dessous.Des informations détaillées pour chaque outil sont fournies sur cette page Web de la boîte à outils https://tools4seedsystems.org/ avec des liens vers :• Une fiche descriptive de l'outil, pour un aperçu rapide de l'outil, y compris des références à la littérature et à d'autres ressources • Un guide de l'utilisateur, avec des procédures sur la façon d'utiliser l'outil • Un article évalué par des pairs qui décrit comment l'outil est utilisé et comment il a été développé ou adapté à partir d'un outil existant • Et, dans certains cas, un blog et d'autres supports de communication.Les outils sont décrits ci-dessous, accompagnés d'exemples de questions auxquelles chacun peut répondre.Le cadre multipartite donne aux chercheurs, aux décideurs et aux praticiens un aperçu rapide des systèmes semenciers des racines, tubercules et bananes. Le cadre est un tableau, avec des rangées de parties prenantes (producteurs de semences, négociants en semences, vulgarisateurs, etc.) et des colonnes de fonctions du système semencier (disponibilité des semences, accès et qualité). Il est idéalement appliqué lors d'ateliers et de visites sur le terrain comme première étape vers la compréhension d'un système semencier ou le suivi d'un projet, ou son évaluation. Lorsqu'il est utilisé avant le démarrage d'un projet ou pour analyser un système semencier, le cadre aide à identifier les prenantes, les goulots d'étranglement et les actions clés pour le projet à venir. Lorsqu'il est utilisé pour suivre ou évaluer un projet, le cadre peut aider à documenter les rôles des parties prenantes en ce qui concerne l'accès, la disponibilité et la qualité des semences, les ruptures de coordination entre les acteurs, et à constituer une base de données plus solide pour les interventions futures. Le cadre offre la possibilité de différencier l'accès et la disponibilité des semences et des variétés pour différents types d'agriculteurs, y compris les hommes et les femmes. Les résultats obtenus avec le cadre doivent généralement être complétés par des études plus approfondies réalisées avec d'autres outils.Questions pouvant être traitées avec le cadre multi-acteurs : Qui sont les acteurs spécifiques d'un système semencier ? Quel est leur point de vue concernant la disponibilité, l'accès et la qualité des semences ? En quoi les agriculteurs et agricultrices diffèrent-ils dans leur accès à des semences de qualité ? Quelles ruptures de coordination se produisent entre les parties prenantes et comment peuvent-elles être résolues ?L'analyse des réseaux d'impact (INA) est un outil d'évaluation des résultats probables d'un projet de système semencier actuel ou potentiel. Ces résultats appuient la prise de décision par les chercheurs, les décideurs et les praticiens. Les résultats peuvent être définis en termes de caractéristiques importantes, notamment la propagation potentielle de la maladie dans le système, l'adoption probable de nouvelles variétés dans la région et la manière dont le système sert différentes catégories de parties prenantes. INA inclut un package R qui simule les résultats pour différents scénarios définis par l'utilisateur. Les utilisateurs directs seraient familiarisés avec les applications R et collaboreraient avec les utilisateurs indirects. Les scénarios sont définis avec des données sur les systèmes semenciers obtenues à partir d'autres outils de la boîte à outils (tels que l'analyse de circulation de semences) ou d'autres sources de données. L'INA peut être appliquée pendant le développement du projet pour aider à prendre des décisions et à identifier les lacunes d'information pour une étude plus approfondie. L'INA peut utiliser des données désagrégées sur les agriculteurs hommes et femmes, les jeunes et les personnes âgées, ou entre les groupes professionnels (tels que les producteurs de semences par rapport aux commerçants). Les scénarios d'intervention peuvent inclure la surveillance d'une maladie transmise par les semences, des subventions pour soutenir l'adoption de nouvelles variétés ou une formation pour promouvoir de nouvelles techniques.Questions qui peuvent être traitées avec l'analyse des réseaux d'impact (INA) : Quels types d'interventions sont susceptibles de conduire à une adoption plus large d'une nouvelle variété ? Quelles sont les meilleures stratégies pour gérer une maladie dans le système semencier ? Quelles subventions profiteraient aux jeunes ou aux femmes ?Le « Seed Tracker » (ST) est un outil TIC qui relie numériquement les acteurs de la chaîne de valeur des semences, suit la production de semences et organise les informations. Le ST fournit des outils de collecte de données numériques (utilisables sur tout appareil connecté à Internet avec un système d'exploitation Android). Il propose des comptes sécurisés individuels et de groupe, ainsi qu'une base de données avec des outils d'analyse et de Système d'information géographique (SIG). Le ST couvre toutes les étapes de la chaîne de valeur des semences et les besoins des parties prenantes : chercheurs, vulgarisateurs, régulateurs, producteurs de semences, commerçants, fournisseurs de services et agriculteurs. Il prend en charge la planification de la production de semences, la traçabilité des semences, la gestion des stocks de semences et l'assurance qualité. Le « Seed Tracker » permet aux autorités de régulation de surveiller la production de semences certifiées et fournit un échange d'informations en temps réel entre les producteurs de semences et les régulateurs. C'est aussi un outil commercial qui permet de mettre en relation les producteurs de semences avec les clients. Il offre des informations en temps réel sur la production de semences par classe de semences, variété, volume et emplacement. Le ST peut être personnalisé pour s'adapter à différentes cultures, réglementations nationales sur les semences et besoins définis par l'utilisateur. Il a le potentiel de cartographier des informations ventilées par sexe.Questions qui peuvent être traitées avec le « Seed Tracker » : Le ST a été conçu à l'origine pour des objectifs pragmatiques et individuels de tous les acteurs de la chaîne de valeur des semences, afin que les producteurs de semences puissent demander : Où puis-je trouver des clients ? Et comment puis-je m'inscrire et obtenir la certification de ma semence en ligne ? Cependant, le tracker de semences peut également être utilisé pour poser des questions au niveau du système telles que : Quelles sont les tendances actuelles en matière de production et de certification de semences ? Où et qui sont les producteurs de semences, les clients, les variétés cultivées, les volumes et les champs de production de semences ? Les régulateurs des semences peuvent l'utiliser comme une plateforme en ligne pour l'enregistrement et la certification de la qualité des champs de semences afin de régulariser les producteurs de semences informels des VPC.Les approches et modèles intégrés pour la santé des semences fournissent un cadre pour combiner trois composantes clés de la gestion de la santé des semences : semences propres, variétés résistantes aux maladies et gestion à la ferme. Une dépendance excessive à l'égard d'un seul élément tend à être moins efficace que des combinaisons stratégiques des trois. Les modèles de santé des semences, en particulier le package R seedHealth, soutiennent la prise en compte d'approches intégrées de la santé des semences en évaluant des scénarios pour combiner ces trois composants. Ces résultats appuient la formation et la prise de décision par les chercheurs, les décideurs et les praticiens. Dans une interface en ligne pour la formation, le package seedHealth illustre les résultats probables de la modification des trois composants. Les utilisateurs directs seraient familiarisés avec les applications R, tandis que les utilisateurs indirects collaboreraient avec les utilisateurs directs. L'interface en ligne est conviviale, même pour ceux qui ne sont pas familiers avec R. Le package seedHealth peut également être utilisé pour évaluer la maladie probable et produire des résultats pour des systèmes et des groupes d'utilisateurs spécifiques (par exemple, le sexe ou les groupes d'âge), lorsque des données suffisantes sont disponibles sur les taux de dégénérescence des graines et les réponses. Le package seedHealth peut être utilisé pour la modélisation d'aide à la décision par les utilisateurs qui peuvent développer ou accéder à des estimations des taux de dégénérescence des semences pour leurs systèmes.Quelle combinaison de semences propres, de résistance aux maladies et de gestion à la ferme sera la meilleure pour un emplacement particulier ? À quelle fréquence faut-il acheter des semences exemptes de maladies ? Si les agriculteurs hommes et femmes ont des pratiques de gestion des semences différentes, comment cela affecte-t-il la dégénérescence et les rendements associés ?L'analyse de circulation de semences peut être utilisé pour cartographier les flux de semences, en particulier lorsque les agriculteurs multiplient de nouvelles variétés et les distribuent dans le système semencier informel. Le jeu de données peut constituer la base d'une Analyse des réseaux d'impact (INA, voir ci-dessus) : il constitue un « jeu de données minimum ». La cartographie des flux de semences aide à comprendre la distribution, la conservation et la propagation des agents pathogènes transmis par les semences dans un système semencier. L'analyse du réseau met en évidence les dimensions sociales d'un système semencier. Par exemple, il peut montrer comment l'accès et l'échange de semences dépendent du sexe ou de la richesse du ménage. Cela peut également révéler quels agriculteurs ont un meilleur accès aux semences formelles. Lors de l'analyse de circulation de semences (par échantillonnage en boule de neige), des données peuvent être collectées sur les transactions entre les acteurs, y compris les volumes, la qualité et les prix. Les transactions forment les liens ou les bords dans l'analyse du réseau et les noeuds représentent les acteurs, tels que les sélectionneurs, les multiplicateurs de semences et les agriculteurs. Le genre, la richesse, la localisation et d'autres informations peuvent être collectées auprès de ces acteurs, en fonction de la question de recherche.Questions qui peuvent être résolues avec l'analyse de circulation de semences. Comment une nouvelle variété se propage-t-elle d'un agriculteur à l'autre ? Comment les hommes et les femmes partagent-ils les semences de différentes manières ? Qu'est-ce que cela signifie pour une introduction efficace de matériel végétal de qualité ?La petite étude de cas exploratoire recueille des données pour se concentrer sur plusieurs sujets, pour obtenir une première compréhension de la façon dont les agriculteurs utilisent et manipulent leurs semences. Une petite enquête N est exploratoire et utilise des données quantitatives et quantitatives. Elle ne prétend pas être représentative ; elle est plus orientée vers une description large que vers des différences et des corrélations statistiquement significatives. Les données sont généralement collectées à l'aide d'un formulaire d'enquête comportant un nombre modeste de questions ouvertes et fermées ; il faut environ une heure ou 90 minutes pour terminer avec chaque agriculteur. Il y a également un espace pour inclure d'autres informations fournies volontairement par les personnes interrogées. Pour identifier les modèles d'utilisation des semences lors d'une première reconnaissance, il est important d'échantillonner stratégiquement différents groupes, tels que les agriculteurs contre les commerçants, les petits exploitants contre les grands agriculteurs, les hommes contre les femmes agriculteurs. Une étude peut nécessiter 12 à 15 enquêtes par type d'agriculteur et 35 à 50 agriculteurs par communauté. Il y a une puissance supplémentaire lors de la comparaison d'études de cas, par exemple en comparant différentes communautés.Questions qui peuvent être abordées avec l'étude de cas exploratoire à petite échelle. Quels agriculteurs conservent leurs propres semences et lesquels les obtiennent en dehors de la ferme ? Où les agriculteurs obtiennent-ils des semences lorsqu'ils n'utilisent pas les leurs ? Quelles semences et variétés les grands et les petits exploitants utilisent-ils ? Quels paiements et échanges les agriculteurs masculins et les agricultrices utilisent-ils ? En quoi l'utilisation des semences des agriculteurs plus âgés diffère-t-elle de celle des jeunes ?La méthode des quatre carrés signifiait à l'origine identifier les variétés de cultures communes, uniques et menacées d'une communauté pour la conservation génétique. Pour les semences végétatives, la méthode peut générer un inventaire des variétés cultivées dans un lieu particulier et discuter de leur importance avec les agriculteurs. Ces informations aident à identifier les interventions semencières nécessaires pour conserver les variétés de cultures et à mettre en évidence les caractéristiques souhaitables dans les nouvelles variétés. La méthode des quatre carrés trace les réponses en deux dimensions (popularité et échelle) pour former quatre cellules dans lesquelles les variétés de semences et de cultures sont positionnées : Cellule 1) variétés cultivées par de nombreux agriculteurs sur une grande surface, Cellule 2) celles cultivées par de nombreux agriculteurs sur une petite surface, Cellule 3) variétés cultivées par quelques agriculteurs sur une grande surface et Cellule 4) celles cultivées par quelques agriculteurs sur une petite zone. La méthode est principalement appliquée comme première étape pour comprendre les variétés cultivées dans une communauté et pourquoi les gens les plantent. La méthode est généralement utilisée dans les groupes de discussion (FGD) qui peuvent être menées séparément pour différents groupes sociaux (sexe, âge, statut social, etc.) afin de saisir des perspectives et des expériences différenciées. Les résultats peuvent aider à identifier les points d'entrée pour des recherches ultérieures. Il peut également compléter une petite étude de cas exploratoire.Questions qui peuvent être traitées avec la méthode des quatre carrés. Quelles variétés locales et améliorées les agriculteurs cultivent-ils ? A quoi servent les différentes variétés ? Que peuvent dire les agriculteurs sur leurs variétés ? En quoi les connaissances et l'expérience des hommes agriculteurs diffèrentelles de celles des femmes ? Quelle est la valeur des variétés locales et améliorées, selon les jeunes agriculteurs ? Quel est l'impact des interventions du système semencier sur la diversité variétale ?L'analyse de chaînages cognitifs (MEC) est une approche issue du domaine des études de consommation. Son attractivité est la liberté qu'elle donne aux répondants de sélectionner et de verbaliser leurs propres construits pour évaluer un produit ou un service. Les entretiens de chaînages cognitifs se composent de deux parties : (1) l'élicitation d'attributs et (2) l'échelonnement. La technique d'élicitation consiste en un tri triadique basé sur la grille du répertoire de Kelly. Typiquement, les agriculteurs ou les commerçants voient trois produits ou services assez similaires, qu'ils doivent trier par similitudes et différences. Ces constructions personnellement pertinentes sont ensuite liées aux propres objectifs des personnes interrogées via des entretiens en échelle dans lesquels l'intervieweur demande uniquement « lequel préférez-vous ? » et « pourquoi est-ce important pour vous ? » En montrant aux personnes interrogées le matériel de plantation réel, les agriculteurs peuvent proposer des caractéristiques ou des motivations que les chercheurs n'auraient pas pu imaginer comme importantes. L'approche a été appliquée pour saisir les perceptions des agriculteurs sur les sources formelles et informelles de plants de pomme de terre au Pérou et de matériel de plantation de bananes en Ouganda. Une étude MEC nécessite environ 40 entretiens, voire moins lorsque les réponses sont très similaires. On peut comparer les réponses des agriculteurs hommes et femmes ou des agriculteurs aisés et pauvres, par exemple. Une certaine formation est nécessaire, en particulier dans l'enregistrement et l'analyse des données.Questions qui peuvent être abordées avec l'analyse de la chaîne moyens-fins. Quelles caractéristiques variétales les agriculteurs apprécient-ils et pourquoi ? Où les agriculteurs préfèrent-ils s'approvisionner en semences et pourquoi ? Les agriculteurs hommes et femmes préfèrent-ils les mêmes caractéristiques variétales et si oui, est-ce pour les mêmes raisons ?Les enchères expérimentales sont devenues une méthode de recherche populaire car elles obtiennent une valeur pour la Volonté réelle de payer (WTP) et la Volonté d'adopter (WTA) d'une personne. Cette valeur réelle ne s'exprime que lorsque les enchères sont bien organisées et que l'enchère pour le produit ressemble à une situation réelle. Les économistes proposent différentes manières d'organiser les enchères et le paiement. Les scientifiques de l'alimentation ont utilisé les enchères pour déterminer les préférences et les valeurs marchandes des nouveaux produits alimentaires. Ce mécanisme est relativement nouveau pour les cultures de racines, de tubercules et de bananes, et pour les semences et les variétés en général, mais un nombre croissant d'études utilisent ce mécanisme. Ils offrent de bonnes occasions de comparer la valeur accordée aux semences, aux variétés ou aux traits variétaux par différents groupes sociaux, c'est-à-dire les hommes et les femmes. Une étude WTP utilisant les mécanismes d'enchères et d'enchères validés existants est coûteuse.Questions qui peuvent être traitées avec des enchères expérimentales. Quelle est la valeur marchande réelle des semences ? Quelle est la différence entre le prix réel que les agriculteurs et les agricultrices sont prêts à payer ? Quel est le WTP relatif entre les semences de différentes caractéristiques, telles que la variété, la source, le niveau de qualité et l'étiquetage ?Cet outil fournit des preuves exploitables sur les politiques et les options d'investissement pour accélérer le développement du système semencier et du marché dans les pays où les cultures à multiplication végétative (VPC) sont importantes pour la sécurité alimentaire et le développement agricole. Les utilisateurs de l'outil sont les chercheurs agricoles et les analystes des politiques. L'outil consiste en une série de listes de contrôle pour les entretiens avec des informateurs clés (KII) à utiliser avec différentes parties prenantes du système semencier, par ex. les sélectionneurs de plantes, les régulateurs publics du matériel végétal VPC, les experts de l'industrie, les entrepreneurs, les commerçants, les producteurs de semences, les importateurs de semences, les ONG ou d'autres parties prenantes, y compris les agriculteurs et les dirigeants de leurs associations. Les entretiens posent des questions sur les différences entre les sexes dans les perceptions sur l'utilisation et les implications des réglementations sur les semences. Les entretiens avec des informateurs clés doivent être complétés par une revue de la littérature, des données secondaires et une analyse de documents.Questions qui peuvent être abordées avec l'analyse du cadre réglementaire des semences. Quels types de politiques publiques et de réglementations sont en place pour les cultures concernées dans un pays ? Comment ces politiques et réglementations sont-elles mises en oeuvre ? Quel type d'assurance qualité est rentable pour accroître l'accès, la disponibilité et la qualité du matériel de plantation ? Comment améliorer l'accès des agricultrices à des semences de qualité ?Cet outil permet d'analyser les performances financières des entreprises de semences de première génération (EGS) gérées par des producteurs de semences spécialisés, tels que les SNRA et des entreprises privées. Les EGS comprennent les plantes in vitro, les semences de pré-base et les semences de base. L'approvisionnement en EGS est souvent un goulot d'étranglement pour l'amélioration des systèmes semenciers formels. SEGSBAT mesure la viabilité financière en six étapes : (1) identifier la capacité de production minimale pour chaque étape de la production d'EGS afin d'atteindre les objectifs de vente minimaux, (2) mesurer le total des coûts récurrents de production pour le produit final, (3) formuler des stratégies de tarification basées sur le type de client et le moment de commande, (4) calculer les fonds, tels que les fonds renouvelables, nécessaires pour couvrir les coûts récurrents totaux, (5) estimer le flux de trésorerie net sur la base des ventes réelles, et (6) examiner et mettre à jour le plan de production chaque saison pour suivre les performances réelles du commerce de semences. Cet outil peut être utilisé par toute personne familiarisée avec Microsoft Excel. Cet outil n'effectue pas d'analyse de faisabilité financière, qui comprend les valeurs actualisées nettes, le taux de rendement interne et l'analyse de sensibilité de l'entreprise. Le genre ne joue aucun rôle évident dans l'application de l'outil ou l'utilisation des informations qui en résultent.Questions qui peuvent être traitées avec SEGSBAT. Qu'est-ce qu'un coût précis de production d'EGS ? Comment déterminer le prix des produits EGS et formuler une stratégie de prix pour les produits EGS afin d'attirer plus de clients ? Existe-t-il des inefficacités de production qui peuvent être rationalisées pour rendre EGS plus rentable pour les fournisseurs ?Un glossaire est particulièrement important pour un sujet comme les systèmes semenciers, qui rassemble des experts de nombreux domaines différents de la biologie, de l'agronomie et des sciences sociales. Ce glossaire détaillé est basé sur une revue de la littérature de publications évaluées par des pairs, citant les textes et fournissant les références, afin que les lecteurs puissent avoir un aperçu rapide du langage technique des systèmes semenciers, tout en pouvant également consulter la littérature originale pour un contexte plus large.Questions qui peuvent être traitées avec le glossaire. Quelle est la différence entre semence « de qualité » et « semence de qualité déclarée » ? J'ai besoin de commencer une revue de littérature (pour ma thèse, pour un cours que j'enseigne, pour un article que j'écris), où puis-je trouver des références solides pour commencer ?Cette section décrit les résultats attendus de l'utilisation des outils, puis quelques exemples de résultats de l'utilisation des outils pour la banane, le manioc, la pomme de terre, la patate douce et l'igname.Le troisième résultat attendu se situe au niveau politique : l'allocation de ressources éclairée par des preuves scientifiques. La plupart des interventions agricoles dans les pays en développement comprennent des composantes solides du système semencier. Cependant, où allouer les ressources est généralement une préoccupation majeure pour les bailleurs de fonds et les décideurs politiques. Les outils présentés ici peuvent aider à allouer des ressources sur la base de preuves scientifiques. Par exemple, pour gérer à long terme la dégénérescence des semences pour les agriculteurs pauvres, il pourrait être plus rentable d'investir dans la sélection de variétés résistantes que dans des systèmes complexes de fourniture de semences propres aux agriculteurs, comme l'évalue le modèle seedHealth.Les cinq exemples suivants, un pour chaque culture majeure d'intérêt pour RTB, décrivent où les outils ont été utilisés et leur potentiel pour mieux comprendre et améliorer les systèmes semenciers :Les pommes de terre sont le « second pain » en République de Géorgie. Cependant, le rendement est de 8,9 à 12 tonnes par ha, tandis que le rendement potentiel peut atteindre 50 tonnes par ha. L'un des obstacles à l'amélioration du rendement de la pomme de terre est la mauvaise qualité du matériel de plantation. Les producteurs de pommes de terre conservent les tubercules de la récolte précédente pour planter la saison suivante. Cette pratique conduit à la dégénérescence des graines, car les agents pathogènes, tels que les virus et Synchytrium endobioticum (l'agent causal de la verrue de la pomme de terre), s'accumulent dans les tubercules de semence, forçant les rendements à diminuer avec le temps. Avec le soutien de l'Agence autrichienne de développement (ADA), le CIP, l'UF et des partenaires locaux ont conçu une intervention pour améliorer la qualité du matériel de plantation (https://ishpotato.cipotato.org/) et un plan national d'amélioration de la pomme de terre de semence (CIP 2019), basée sur l'approche intégrée de la santé des semences (Thomas-Sharma et al. 2015) (Outil 3, Tableau 1). Les résultats de cette intervention incluent l'adoption par des centaines d'agriculteurs de la sélection positive, une technique simple pour sélectionner les meilleurs tubercules de semence ; l'identification de trois clones de pomme de terre résistants aux virus à diffuser en tant que variétés ; et l'adaptation des normes internationales de certification des semences aux conditions géorgiennes. De même, à l'aide d'une analyse des réseaux d'impact (INA) (Outil 2, Tableau 1), l'équipe de l'étude a modélisé des scénarios de propagation de S. endobioticum, dans le cadre d'une analyse d'évaluation des risques, et identifié les zones où l'agent pathogène doit être surveillé attentivement pour éviter des pertes importantes (Andersen et coll. 2020), s'appuyant sur des concepts développés dans une étude des systèmes semenciers de patate douce en Ouganda (Andersen et al. 2019).Le manioc est l'une des cultures de rente les plus importantes en Asie du Sud-Est. Les racines féculentes de la culture sont largement produites par de petits exploitants au Cambodge, au Laos, au Vietnam, en Thaïlande, en Indonésie et aux Philippines, alimentant des chaînes de valeur de plusieurs milliards de dollars. Mais malgré sa taille et son importance économique, l'industrie reste vulnérable à l'invasion de ravageurs et de maladies limitant le rendement. En 2017, le virus de la mosaïque du manioc du Sri Lanka (SLCMV) a été signalé au Cambodge et s'est depuis propagé à quatre autres pays de la région. L'Asie du Sud-Est manque de variétés résistantes et la maladie s'est rapidement propagée à l'aide de vecteurs d'aleurodes et d'échange de tiges de plantation infectées (Minato et al. 2019). La réponse a été particulièrement entravée par l'absence de connaissance systématique des réseaux de semences de manioc. Grâce à une subvention du Centre australien pour la recherche agricole internationale (ACIAR), le Centre international pour l'agriculture tropicale (CIAT) a mené une étude avec WUR, UF et des partenaires nationaux au Cambodge, au Vietnam et en Chine pour comprendre l'utilisation et le mouvement de semences du manioc, et pour modéliser la propagation probable et l'impact des interventions d'atténuation. L'approche a utilisé une combinaison d'analyse de circulation de semences (Outil 5, Tableau 1) pour cartographier les réseaux d'échange de matériel végétal existants (Delaquis et al. 2018) et l'analyse des réseaux d'impact (Outil 2, Tableau 1) pour construire des modèles épidémiologiques combinant à la fois des paramètres environnementaux et des réseaux d'échange de semences pour modéliser des scénarios de propagation (publication à venir). Les résultats de ce travail ont conduit à un vaste nouveau projet de recherche ACIAR sur la réponse SLCMV, et ont été présentés lors d'ateliers de parties prenantes et de réunions des groupes de travail régionaux pour SLCMV, fournissant aux représentants du gouvernement régional et aux acteurs de la chaîne de valeur du manioc les toutes premières données régionales sur SLCMV, échange de semences et analyses de scénarios pour la planification des interventions.Dans la patate douce, le cadre multipartite (Outil 1, Tableau 1) a été utilisé dans le cadre d'un examen postintervention et d'un atelier d'apprentissage du projet Marando Bora (Better Vines) mis en oeuvre dans Lake Zone, en Tanzanie (Ogero et al. 2015). Le projet a formé des multiplicateurs de vigne décentralisés (DVM) pour multiplier le matériel de plantation de variétés améliorées et le distribuer par le biais d'un système de bons subventionnés. Le cadre multipartite a permis une réflexion systématique à partir des perspectives de différentes parties prenantes sur les succès et les défis de l'amélioration de la disponibilité, de l'accès et de la qualité du matériel de plantation de patate douce pour différents types d'agriculteurs. Plusieurs défis ont été mis en évidence : certaines variétés étaient sensibles aux maladies virales de la patate douce ; les connaissances sur la dégénérescence des semences étaient insuffisantes et il n'était pas clair quand les agriculteurs devraient remplacer leur matériel de plantation. Ces questions ont ensuite été explorées dans un projet de suivi, Kinga Marando (Protéger les vignes), qui a introduit une technologie innovante de gestion des maladies utilisant des tunnels en filet pour protéger le matériel de plantation des insectes. Des modèles de santé des semences (Outil 4, Tableau 1) ont ensuite été utilisés pour évaluer la dégénérescence des semences pour deux variétés préférées, avec et sans filets. Les résultats de cette recherche ont été utilisés pour recommander le nombre de saisons où les agriculteurs peuvent réutiliser le matériel de plantation avant d'atteindre un seuil économique potentiel de 40 % de perte de rendement (Ogero et al. 2019).Le « Seed Tracker » (Outil 3, Tableau 1) a été utilisé pour la première fois avec le manioc au Nigeria et en Tanzanie. Son utilisation récente avec l'igname au Nigéria illustre les avantages de l'application des TIC pour la collecte de données dans le suivi en temps réel de la production de graines d'igname (Ouma et al. 2019). Les données sur les semences d'igname au Nigéria sont principalement collectées à l'aide de carnets de terrain, puis saisies dans une feuille Microsoft Access. Les faiblesses de ces systèmes de données comprennent le retour d'information tardif et le manque de données sur demande, ce qui entrave l'analyse de circulation de semences à divers stades de la production et de la gestion des cultures. L'étude a fourni aux collecteurs de données une application préinstallée « Seed Tracker » (ST) à utiliser sur un appareil Android. Cette application a amélioré l'efficacité, la rapidité et la commodité de la collecte et de la visualisation des données, montrant que le ST peut être utilisé dans la gestion des cultures et la recherche, pas seulement avec des semences. Recevoir une rétroaction utile et rapide a été à la fois une incitation pour les agriculteurs à fournir des données de qualité et une justification sur laquelle fonder leurs décisions de gestion pour augmenter les rendements. Les parties prenantes ont pu visualiser les tendances de la production et de la commercialisation de l'igname.Dans le cas de la banane, la méthode des quatre carrés a été utilisée au Burundi pour évaluer comment la diversité de la banane était influencée par la maladie invasive du Bunchy top et par les interventions du système semencier utilisées pour la contrôler (Simbare et al. 2020). Cela a permis une discussion avec les agriculteurs sur les changements dans la diversité du groupe bananier des hautes terres d'Afrique de l'Est, ce qui était important parce que les agriculteurs sont des acteurs des semences et les gardiens de la diversité à la ferme. Les agriculteurs pourraient également anticiper la pénétration éventuelle de variétés introduites via des interventions de culture tissulaire. Cette étude a révélé la nécessité d'inclure un objectif de conservation dans les interventions du système semencier dans les lieux qui sont des centres de diversité secondaire, fournissant ainsi un argument solide pour des approches alternatives à l'assurance qualité des semences dans ces zones. Les données de ces études ont également constitué la base d'une étude du réseau d'impact en cours sur les systèmes semenciers de banane afin de révéler les interactions des systèmes d'acquisition de semences coexistants. L'étude a révélé qu'un mélange d'approches formelles et informelles est nécessaire pour développer le système de semences de banane afin de répondre aux multiples besoins des ménages et de les aider à améliorer leur productivité et à faire face aux défis émergents.La boîte à outils est composée de 11 outils (méthodes, modèles, approches et TIC) et d'un glossaire qui peut être utilisé par les chercheurs, les décideurs et les praticiens pour diagnostiquer, évaluer et améliorer les systèmes semenciers de banane, manioc, pomme de terre, patate douce, et l'igname. Les outils et la boîte à outils sont le résultat de l'effort combiné de plus de 50 scientifiques de différents horizons techniques et scientifiques travaillant depuis 2012. En fonction de leurs intérêts et de leurs questions, les chercheurs, les décideurs et les praticiens peuvent sélectionner un outil dans la perspective d'une chaîne de valeur des semences (des ressources phytogénétiques aux marchés et aux consommateurs) ou d'un cycle de projet (du diagnostic à l'analyse de scénarios). Les résultats attendus de l'utilisation des outils comprennent une meilleure compréhension des systèmes semenciers tubercules et de bananes, une conception et une évaluation améliorées des interventions, et l'allocation des ressources sur la base de preuves scientifiques. Plusieurs de ces résultats sont décrits dans des exemples fournis pour la pomme de terre en Géorgie ; le manioc en Asie du Sud-Est, au Nigeria en Tanzanie ; patate douce en Tanzanie ; l'igname au Nigeria ; et la banane au Burundi.Les auteurs envisagent la boîte à outils comme une initiative vivante qui évoluera avec le temps. La Figure 1 montre qu'il existe des composants dans une chaîne de valeur des semences qui ne sont pas entièrement pris en compte par les outils actuels. Par exemple, davantage d'outils sont nécessaires pour aider à concevoir des stratégies de diffusion de variétés améliorées, ou pour aider à sélectionner des techniques de multiplication rapide pour produire des semences de première génération. De nouveaux outils seront ajoutés pour combler ces lacunes à l'avenir.","tokenCount":"6244"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0552118908.json b/data/part_2/0552118908.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ea82dd574ff261233a52e3217144bd8e494b1010 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0552118908.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"5a850e9555999a2ee607f4f337573b56","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/f560b6b8-0917-4e72-ad6e-0ea96c67c67e/retrieve","id":"1282071909"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"ba92c492-290a-47a8-ba7b-e1c7a90831f1","pagecount":"57","content":"por su acompañamiento en la construcción del enfoque de las MTA y su liderazgo en el proceso de implementación.Los autores agradecen sinceramente a las siguientes instituciones por el apoyo brindado para el desarrollo del enfoque MTA como insumos en la elaboración del presente manual: ElManual de implementación: Guía detallada sobre el uso de MTA, paso por paso Introducción Las nuevas herramientas de información climática que incluyen análisis históricos, sistemas de monitoreo, predicciones climáticas tienen el poder de ayudar a los agricultores a adaptarse a los impactos de la variabilidad y cambio climático. Al proporcionar información climática local traducida junto con los servicios de extensión, los agricultores están mejor preparados para protegerse de los fenómenos climáticos extremos y aprovechar las buenas condiciones climáticas, cerrando así la brecha entre la generación de información agro-climática y su uso por parte de los agricultores.Bajo el proyecto financiado por el Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural en Colombia durante 2013 hasta 2015 se da inicio al enfoque de las Mesas Técnicas Agroclimáticas (MTA), que fue inspirado en el trabajo de las aldeas en Senegal (PNUMA, 2014). En las metas de Colombia (formalmente conocidos como \"Contribuciones Determinadas Nacionales\" o NDC) negociadas en el acuerdo de Paris 2015 bajo el Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climático (CMNUCC), Colombia se comprometió a que el país disponga una red de MTA con 15 departamentos participando, y un millón de productores recibiendo información agroclimática. Por lo anterior, en un proceso de sostenibilidad gremios como Fedarroz y Fenalce iniciaron el liderazgo de las MTA locales con el apoyo del servicio meteorológico nacional -IDEAM, que lidera la MTA a escala Nacional. A partir del 2017, MADR continuó liderando la iniciativa de las MTA, y a través de una alianza con FAO la implementación de las MTA locales en un proceso de escalamiento con ocho (8) MTA en Colombia.La MTA es un proceso de diálogo entre una diversidad de actores locales incluyendo científicos, técnicos, representantes del sector público, privado y agricultores que busca comprender el posible comportamiento del clima en una localidad y generar recomendaciones para disminuir los riesgos asociados a la variabilidad climática esperada (Loboguerrero et al. 2018). Como resultado de dicho diálogo, se genera un boletín agroclimático que contiene la predicción climática, su posible impacto en los cultivos para condiciones específicas en tiempo y espacio, asociado a recomendaciones como toma de decisión para cada rubro productivo. Las predicciones climáticas, son generadas en consenso con el servicio meteorológico de cada país y los grupos de agro meteorología existentes de las instituciones, con el fin de identificar las mejores prácticas de adaptación a los fenómenos climáticos, que son transferidas a técnicos y productores locales por medio del Boletín Agroclimático Local.Este manual brinda instrucciones paso a paso para trabajar el enfoque de las MTA. Está dirigido principalmente a instituciones líderes del sector agropecuario que tengan interés de implementar un espacio de discusión en su región. Este enfoque consta de siete pasos, que se llevan a cabo con las instituciones participantes. Dada la naturaleza específica por lugar, hay una serie de actividades de preparación que son necesarias realizar antes de cada reunión. A lo largo del manual se destacarán unos recuadros naranja los que indican consideraciones de género e inclusión social para la implementación de las MTAEs necesario identificar las demandas y preferencias de los agricultores para obtener información agroclimática, debido a importantes diferencias sociales que se encuentran en su entorno habitacional entre estas la desigualdad y falta de equidad entre hombres y mujeres. Por lo anterior, los roles, responsabilidades y actividades diarias que llevan a cabo las mujeres y los hombres determinan cómo perciben el cambio y el riesgo socio ambiental y cómo responden y se adaptan a ellos (Bee, 2016). En consecuencia, las mujeres y los hombres pueden tener diferentes necesidades, acceso y respuesta a la información climática (Kristjanson et al., 2017).Los servicios climáticos pueden correr el riesgo de exacerbar las desigualdades de género que prevalecen en otras estructuras institucionales, por lo tanto es relevante evaluar los diversos desafíos y oportunidades que enfrentan hombres y mujeres para incorporar información climática en la toma de decisiones agrícolas y la planificación de medios de vida (Gumucio, et al., 2018a). En este contexto, este manual identifica las consideraciones relacionadas a género para la implementación de las MTA, a fin de garantizar que tanto las mujeres como los hombres tengan la oportunidad de beneficiarse de la información agroclimática que se genera. También se abordan aspectos generales sobre inclusión social, aquí unos puntos importantes: La información generada a través de las MTA deben ser relevante para los agricultores; esto a menudo implica incorporar mecanismos en la MTA para asegurar que los intereses de mujeres y hombres, y de los diversos grupos sociales existentes en el territorio, estén representados.  También es de suma importancia que la MTA utilice canales de comunicación apropiados para mujeres y hombres para la difusión de información agroclimática, como el contenido del boletín agroclimático.Al pasar por cada fase y paso del proceso de las MTA, el Manual destaca la importancia de garantizar que las consideraciones para la igualdad y equidad entre hombres y mujeres se incorporen de manera integral, desde el principio hasta el final.En el presente manual, las actividades están divididas en pasos claros y lógicos. Cada paso se basa en lo que se cubrió en los pasos anteriores. Así, los primeros se centran en la implementación de la mesa, la información climática y agronómica de los diferentes cultivos. Un componente transversal en todos los pasos es el fortalecimiento de capacidades o alfabetización agroclimática; como se denomina en Colombia, anexo podrá encontrar el contenido de alfabetización agroclimática promovidos por la FAO en Colombia en las MTA (Anexo 1).Los siguientes pasos le permiten al lector, participar en un diálogo sobre los posibles impactos de la predicción climática sobre su cultivo e identificar las mejores prácticas de adaptación con base en la información presentada, que luego serán traducidas y plasmadas en el boletín agroclimático regional. Finalmente, el lector tendrá la responsabilidad de difundir el boletín a su entorno de trabajo (ej. agricultores, servicio extensión), y lograr retroalimentar la MTA con los hallazgos encontrados en el proceso de difusión. El proceso se puede dividir en 7 pasos (como se indica a continuación y en el diagrama de actividades de la página 5): Paso 1: ¿Cómo iniciar la primera reunión de implementación de la MTA? Paso 2: Información climática: datos históricos, monitoreo y pronósticos  Paso 3: Información de cultivo: mesas de trabajo y modelos de cultivo  Paso 4: ¿Cómo generar las recomendaciones dada la predicción agroclimática? Paso 5: Generación del boletín agroclimático local  Paso 6: Difusión del boletín agroclimático local  Paso 7: Lecciones aprendidas y mejora del proceso.Manual de implementación Mesa Técnica Agroclimática (MTA) Guía detallada -paso a paso -Cada paso tiene un conjunto de actividades que el líder del proceso, implementa con los participantes, mediante una serie de reuniones. Las actividades de cada paso se explican con mayor detalle en las hojas de actividades que se encuentran a lo largo de este manual. Los nombres de las hojas de actividades corresponden al nombre del paso al que corresponden, p. ej. Paso 1, Hojas de actividades 1a y 1b. Una de las primeras responsabilidades del líder, es establecer un cronograma de reuniones. Cuando elabore el programa, necesitará tomar en consideración en qué época del año se llevará a cabo cada paso, con el objetivo de que el usuario final del boletín agroclimático local pueda tener el insumo para tomar decisiones de su cultivo a tiempo. Si los participantes de la MTA acostumbran a realizar reuniones periódicas con los agricultores, la información presentada en la MTA puede ser insumo en dichas reuniones.Esta es solo una sugerencia de programa y se debe adaptar a las necesidades del contexto específico, rubros productivos y logística de cada MTA local. Por ejemplo: 1) En Colombia, las reuniones de las MTA se realizan mes a mes, en cada reunión se presenta el pronóstico de tiempo y clima, las recomendaciones de los cultivos para las fases más importantes, y se genera un boletín agroclimático local mensual, 2) En Honduras, las reuniones de las MTA se realizan antes del inicio de las fecha de siembra importante de los principales cultivos y una reunión al final del ciclo, en total se generan 3 boletines agroclimáticos regionales al año para las siembras de primera, postrera y apante 2 .A continuación se presenta el diagrama de actividades de cada paso, asociado cronológicamente al inicio de época de lluvias, que es de importancia para las actividades agropecuarias del país. Seguir esta secuencia paso a paso brinda un proceso práctico y lógico para ayudar en la generación del boletín agroclimático como instrumento en la planificación y toma decisiones. Sin embargo, para algunos pasos, puede que no sea necesario seguir todas las actividades descritas del presente manual, dada la naturaleza o contexto específico de cada MTA.Mucho antes de la época de lluvias Paso 1: ¿Cómo iniciar la primera reunión de implementación de la MTA?Paso 2: Información climática: datos históricos, monitoreo y pronósticos Paso 3: Información de cultivo: mesas de trabajo y modelos de cultivoPaso 4: ¿Toma de decisiones dada la predicción agroclimática?Paso 5: Generación del boletín agroclimático local Paso 6: Difusión del boletín agroclimático localPaso 7: Lecciones aprendidas y mejora del proceso.Nota importante: se recomienda que la(s) institución(es) que implemente(n) la MTA, sea líder en la región, con poder de convocatoria. Como líder de la MTA, es importante que siempre tenga en mente su función, que es la de facilitar el aprendizaje, análisis compartidos entre los participantes, y la generación del boletín agroclimático local, así como la comunicación permanente con el servicio meteorológico de su país y otras instituciones clave a nivel nacional.Ingredientes a tener en cuenta antes de iniciar el proceso:¿Por qué implementar una MTA? Pensar en implementar una MTA implica iniciar un proceso de cambio en actitud, conocimientos y habilidades de los actores que participan. Este proceso es resultado de la reflexión por parte de los actores involucrados sobre la necesidad de cerrar la brecha entre la generación de información climática y su uso por parte de las instituciones, servicios de extensión y agricultores, donde se puedan tomar decisiones en los cultivos dadas las variaciones climáticas esperadas en su región.Es necesario hacer una revisión de los documentos que hacen parte de los antecedentes del trabajo de CCAFS (Fig. 1), en la creación de las Mesas Técnicas Agroclimáticas, definiéndose la documentación que debe ser parte del marco conceptual y las lecciones aprendidas de las instituciones que han liderado la implementación de las MTA en otros territorios.También, es clave identificar iniciativas lideradas que se enfocan en los intereses de mujeres y hombres en el territorio e incluir a estos actores en la MTA. Los sesgos basados en género a menudo pueden subyacer a organizaciones agropecuarias, de manera que los intereses de las mujeres pueden ser descuidados (Perez et al., 2015). Ejemplos de organizaciones a incluir en la MTA: instituciones para el desarrollo con un mandato de igualdad de género, ONG sectoriales relevantes que tengan interés o experiencia en asuntos de género, y una organización inclusiva de mujeres. Desde el sector gubernamental, es relevante incluir puntos focales de género del ministerio de agricultura, medio ambiente o sectores asociados.Funciones de la institución que lidera la primera reunión de la MTA a) Identificar los actores potenciales (instituciones) que conformarían la MTA. b) Identificación potencial de recursos humanos y financieros, socios que puedan hacer sostenible la MTA. c) Generar una carta de invitación que indique el motivo de la reunión, así como la fecha y lugar d) Generar una agenda de trabajo para esta primera reunión e) Tener un grupo con la lista de correos de los actores a convocar a la reunión, para enviarle la invitación Figura 1. Para los antecedentes de la creación de las MTA, consultar la página de CCAFS (https://goo.gl/Jq4DhG)Es la persona(s) de la institución que lidera la MTA, que preside, coordina y enlaza el grupo de debate durante el diálogo. Debe hacer aportes, conciliar el trabajo de los miembros, dar la palabra, anunciar los tiempos y mantener un ambiente de polémica pero de buena actitud entre los participantes. Deberá ser imparcial y objetivo en sus intervenciones, resúmenes y conclusiones.Cuando se explica una actividad es útil proporcionar un ejemplo. Después de presentar los ejemplos es importante recordar que en todos los métodos participativos son los asistentes los que llevan a cabo las actividades. Sus actividades como facilitador durante el desarrollo del evento son: abrir la sesión con palabras iniciales, mencionando el tema por tratarse, explicar el procedimiento que ha de seguirse, hacer la presentación de los expositores, comunicar al auditorio la metodología de preguntas y ofrecer la palabra al primer expositor.Son los expertos que presentan las predicciones climáticas y los análisis agroclimáticos, cuyos resultados representan las bases para generar la discusión y análisis entre los participantes de la MTA, con el fin de proponer las medidas adaptativas en los cultivos priorizados, teniendo en cuenta las evaluaciones agroclimáticas. Deben tener conocimiento en temas de modelación, análisis de predicción climática y agroclimática.Después de seleccionada(s) la(s) institución(es) líder(es) de la MTA, se convocan para iniciar el proceso participativo, trabajando en sesiones mensuales (o según sea decidido con los miembros de la MTA), poner en marcha y así replicar la experiencia del trabajo de las MTA en otras regiones del país. La metodología antes, durante y después de la MTA, debe comprender la planificación y concertación local para el abordaje de los temas o problemas relacionados con las actividades agropecuarias, en lo relacionado con la toma de decisiones, acciones preventivas y la reducción de pérdidas por fenómenos meteorológicos y climáticos adversos.De manera general, las sesiones mensuales constan de cinco fases: i) la introducción (presentación de la agenda y de los asistentes), ii) el cuerpo de la discusión (presentación de las predicciones agroclimáticas para los próximos meses, con la sesión de preguntas y respuestas), iii) análisis de medidas adaptativas de manera participativa (por grupos temáticos, por ejemplo los conocedores de cada cultivo), iv) construcción del boletín agroclimático local , y v) comentarios finales (sobre la dinámica de la MTA, conclusiones y compromisos adquiridos). La reunión inicia con la introducción: El facilitador comienza presentando una introducción del tema que se va a tratar, explica cómo se va a desarrollar la MTA, la estrategia y los tiempos asignados, presenta a los expositores y comunica al auditorio la metodología para la formulación de preguntas. Documentar la experiencia durante el evento: Para lograr registros confiables y de incidencia es necesario documentar durante el desarrollo de la MTA, las acciones de cada reunión, así como de los acuerdos entre las partes y listados de asistencia, el cual serán consignados en las ayudas de memoria. Además de tomar apuntes, dejar registrado el evento con fotografías, en twitter y videos para el desarrollo de las memorias o actas.Nota importante: Tiene que considerar que para muchos de los participantes los conceptos relacionados con información meteorológica y climática son nuevos, y que existe una brecha entre la generación de información climática y su uso por parte del sector agropecuario. Así que, usted deberá asegurar que antes de generar un boletín agroclimático local, los participantes de la MTA manejen y conozcan los conceptos, que haya una homologación de lenguajes, que se cumpla con las capacitaciones y evaluaciones respectivas de los temas.En las MTA ya establecidas, las primeras 2 o 3 reuniones se tomaron para transferencia de capacidades en temas climáticos, y luego se diseña un currículo de capacitaciones de acuerdo a las necesidades y requerimientos de la MTA que contribuya a mejorar la información agroclimática contenida en el boletín. Estas capacitaciones se dictan en una sesión aparte a la reunión de la MTA. Es decir en horas de la mañana (8:30 -12:00) se tenía la reunión de la MTA, y en horas de la tarde, o al día siguiente todo el día se dictaba la capacitación del tema priorizado.¿Cómo iniciar la primera reunión de implementación de la MTA?Paso 1Paso 1 -¿Cómo iniciar la primera reunión de implementación de la MTA?Al finalizar este paso, tanto usted lector, como los participantes a la MTA deben tener muy claro cuál es la visión y misión de la MTA a implementar, así como el compromiso y aporte de cada institución. Este será el punto de partida para generar el mapeo de información de clima y cultivo, y posteriormente el plan de trabajo. Es importante que los participantes trabajen en conjunto por un mismo objetivo.1. Comprender el alcance, antecedentes y lecciones aprendidas en las MTA ya implementadas en los diferentes países. 2. Identificar qué actividades lleva a cabo cada institución, en que cultivos y zonas trabaja, y su interés en ser parte de la MTA (mediante un mapeo de actores). 3. Revisar si existe coherencia entre los objetivos, metas y actividades para el establecimiento de la MTA a través de un mecanismo de formalización (ej. carta, reglamento, acuerdo). 4. Generar un punto de partida para explorar la información climática y de cultivo disponible en la región. 5. Construir un plan estratégico de funcionamiento de la MTA Mapa de actores (ver Hoja de actividades 1a).  Antecedentes de la MTA ya implementadas en los diferentes países  Carta de formalización de la MTA (misión, visión, compromisos)  Matriz de información de clima y cultivo (ver Hoja de actividades 1b).  Plan de trabajo (ver Hoja de actividades 1c)Dado que es la primera reunión de la MTA, asegúrese de tomarse el tiempo para explicar todo el proceso en general y el propósito de las diferentes reuniones que se planificarán. Según concertaciones previas y experiencias derivadas de las MTA anteriores, se propone la agenda para este primer día que se realice entre las 08:30 AM y las 04:00 PM.Manual de implementación Mesa Técnica Agroclimática (MTA) Guía detallada -paso a paso -Un mapa de actores es una herramienta participativa que describe cuales son los actores que intervienen en el proceso de generar, difundir y recibir información relacionada con clima y cultivo, además un análisis del papel de los actores, sus aportes y sus capacidades para el abordaje de las temáticas. La participación de los \"actores clave\" es crucial para el éxito de cualquier iniciativa, contando con un proceso previo de identificación. Esta incorporación de actores es dinámica y se fortalece a medida que todos sus participantes se apropian del proceso.Las capacidades técnicas institucionales que los actores aportan a la estrategia de las MTA son analizadas desde la generación, transferencia y mecanismos de apropiación de información agroclimática. Lo anterior, hace referencia con lo que cuentan las instituciones del sector agropecuario para la generación, la apropiación y divulgación de información agroclimática, por ejemplo: oficinas internas de cambio climático, personal especializado, equipos de extensión, acceso a radios comunitarias, programas radiales, boletines internos, cobertura regional, estaciones agroclimáticas, entre otros.Necesitará lista de asistencia, cartulinas de colores y marcadores para escribir el nombre de las instituciones. Adicionalmente, necesitará una cartulina con las preguntas iniciales.1. Después de dar la bienvenida a los participantes, usted como facilitador realizará las siguientes preguntas a los participantes como una introducción, a) nombre y profesión, b) institución a la que representa, y c) en la opinión de los participantes que es una mesa técnica agroclimática. Esta dinámica puede ser tan creativa como sea posible para romper el hielo entre los asistentes. 2. Los nombres de las instituciones participantes se escriben en tarjetas de cartulina y se agrupan según el tipo de institución (ej. organización de cooperación internacional, organización de enseñanza, investigación y/o desarrollo, organización gubernamental, gobierno central, agremiaciones, asociaciones y cooperativas, productores del departamento/municipio, gobierno local o instancia de gobierno local, y medios de difusión). 3. Una encuesta pequeña con una escala sobre las capacidades técnicas de cada institución. 4. En cartulinas de color blanco recopilar las opiniones de cada participante sobre que es una MTA. 5. Al final de este paso socializar el mapeo de actores (Fig. 3), que será utilizado en los próximos pasos.Figura 3. Ejemplo de mapeo de Actores en Santander -ColombiaEs importante saber que esta iniciativa comenzó en el año 2013 cuando CCAFS facilitó una experiencia de intercambio en el cual, una delegación de Colombia y Honduras visitó el Territorio Sostenible Adaptado al Clima de Kaffrine 3 en Senegal 4 para aprender cómo la información meteorológica estaba ayudando a los agricultores a adaptarse a la variabilidad climática. En 2014, una delegación Senegal-Honduras visitó Colombia para continuar el proceso de aprendizaje 5 . Posteriormente, CCAFS junto con el Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural (MADR) y otros socios nacionales iniciaron en Colombia el proyecto de las MTA a finales de 2014.En un proceso de sostenibilidad gremios como Fedarroz y Fenalce iniciaron el liderazgo de las MTA locales con el apoyo del servicio meteorológico nacional -IDEAM, que lidera la MTA a escala Nacional. A partir del 2017, MADR continuó liderando la iniciativa de las MTA, y a través de una alianza con FAO la implementación de las MTA locales en un proceso de escalamiento con ocho (8) MTA en Colombia.Se recomienda presentar el video \"Información climática puesta en manos de los agricultores\" 6Un proyector para presentaciones de diapositivas y audio para video.1. Coordinar previo a la reunión con un representante de CCAFS, para dar una presentación de una hora (con preguntas) sobre los antecedentes de las Mesas Técnicas Agroclimáticas, los componentes de trabajo y cómo funciona la colaboración interinstitucional. El trabajo que se ha realizado en las MTA ya implementadas y presentar estudios de caso sobre su funcionamiento, así como las lecciones aprendidas. 2. Coordinar previo a la reunión con un representante de otra MTA ya implementada, para dar una presentación de media hora (con preguntas) sobre su funcionamiento, cómo se genera el boletín agroclimático y qué impactos ha generado.Las iniciativas de creación de espacios de discusión entre multi-actores, resulta en muchas ocasiones reuniones informales con un fin inmediato específico. En ese sentido, la preocupación en consolidar el proceso de la gobernanza agroclimática en los departamentos se debe considerar como puntos clave a resolver los siguientes aspectos: participación permanente y sistémica de los actores del sector agropecuario; difusión y trascendencia de la información generada; y sostenibilidad técnico operativa de las MTA.Al desarrollar las reglas y acuerdos para formalizar la MTA, es importante considerar los procesos y procedimientos que pueden facilitar la discusión grupal y la toma de decisión inclusiva. Esto es crítico, reconociendo la diversidad de actores que se reúnen para la MTA y las desigualdades en la participación que pueden resultar debido a las diferencias de género, etnia, etapa de la vida y otros atributos socioeconómicos. Es importante promover la incorporación de las mujeres a las capacitaciones técnicas convocándolas de manera directa, o a través de organizaciones en las que tengan participación efectiva.También, promocionar también mecanismos que permitan aumentar las capacidades institucionales en la apropiación de información agroclimática en especial a los actores regionales. La creación de una MTA trae consigo un proceso de compromiso por parte de las instituciones participantes. Por tal razón, se recomienda que la MTA tenga un proceso de formalización y fijación de metas, que hace posible la medición de los resultados y la evaluación del grado de cumplimiento y eficiencia logrados por los miembros. La formalización de la MTA se puede llevar a cabo de varias formas: a) Un proceso de apropiación y gobernanza durante el transcurso de la implementación de la MTA, con actividades que van desde un análisis DOFA de los actores, análisis de la participación e interés de las instituciones en la temática, apropiación de la información agroclimática, para en el largo plazo generar un acuerdo de voluntades de la MTA (Caso MTA Colombia) b) Un acuerdo de voluntades firmado por las instituciones participantes para el establecimiento de la MTA. Se aclara que, en ningún caso, el presente acuerdo faculta a las instituciones firmantes para la delegación de las funciones que por ley le corresponde (caso MTA Guatemala) c) Un reglamento (capítulos y artículos) de la MTA firmado por las instituciones participantes (caso MTA Honduras) que incluye: a. Capítulo I: Creación, objeto, visión, misión, domicilio y duración b. Capitulo II: Estructura Organizativa c. Capitulo III: Atribuciones de los cargos directivos MTA, anexo plan de trabajo, cumplimiento de objetivos, acuerdos y plazos. d. Capitulo IV: Acceso, generación y difusión de información de la MTA Este reglamento fue promovido por la Secretaria de Agricultura y Ganadería (SAG), para que las MTA quedaran dentro el marco legal y político de la Estrategia de Adaptación para el sector agroalimentario de Honduras, este acuerdo ministerial para la creación de las MTA facilitó su establecimiento y sostenibilidad.Necesitará un rotafolio, cartulina de colores y marcadores Procedimiento 1. Retomar las opiniones de cada participante sobre que es una MTA escritas en las cartulinas blancas (paso del mapeo de actores), y consolidar participativamente una sola definición sobre que es una MTA. 2. Entendiendo qué es una MTA por todos los participantes, se procede a entregar 3 cartulinas de diferentes colores, para que cada institución escriba desde su punto de vista cual sería el objeto, misión, visión de la MTA de su región.100% de acuerdo en una MTA para mi región Figura 4. Creación de la misión, visión y objetivos de la MTA en Danli -Honduras 3. Luego de definir en conjunto el objeto, la misión, y visión de la MTA, se procede a realizar las siguientes preguntas: a. ¿Cuál sería el papel y aporte de mi institución dentro de la MTA? b. ¿Qué instituciones deberían ser invitadas a participar en la MTA?Al realizar el mapeo de cultivos y clima, es importante distinguir los roles de las mujeres y los hombres en la agricultura, la ganadería y la seguridad alimentaria, e incluir una discusión sobre los cultivos y las actividades agrícolas de las que son responsables.Los agricultores hombres y mujeres a menudo tienen responsabilidades domésticas distintas y desempeñan roles diferenciados en las actividades comerciales y de subsistencia y en el uso de los recursos naturales. En consecuencia, pueden participar de manera diferente en las cadenas de valor, y también pueden llevar a cabo distintas actividades productivas. Por ejemplo, las mujeres a menudo pueden desempeñar roles primarios en las cadenas de valor de los cultivos y productos derivados destinados para la subsistencia del hogar (como ejemplo, las mujeres suelen participar significativamente a lo largo de las cadenas de valor de las setas; este producto suele ser importante para el rol de las mujeres en la preparación de comidas y la seguridad alimentaria del hogar).Es importante definir con los participantes, el alcance geográfico de la MTA (regional, departamental, municipal). Por lo cual, identificar la cobertura de información climática proveniente de estaciones meteorológicas es un punto de partida. El facilitador antes de iniciar la primera MTA, debe realizar los siguientes pasos:1) Contactar al servicio meteorológico de su país, contarle la iniciativa de la implementación de la MTA, hacerlo parte de la MTA.2) De acuerdo a la región o departamento en la cual se va implementar el proceso de la MTA, solicitar al servicio meteorológico la ubicación (coordenadas y altura) de las estaciones meteorológicas de esa zona con sus respectivos metadatos (temporalidad, fecha de instalación, tipo de estación, % de datos faltantes). 3) A través de un sistema de información geográfica se debe generar un mapa con los límites administrativos de la región, departamento, municipios y la ubicación de las estaciones meteorológicas con su respectiva leyenda.Necesitará un rotafolio, 3 plotters de los mapas, marcadores de varios colores, y una hoja anexo por cada institución participante (Anexo 3)De acuerdo al número de participantes, divida tres grupos de trabajo con el objetivo de realizar un ejercicio de identificación de los principales municipios donde se utilizará la información climática generada por la MTA para la toma de decisiones. Así mismo, se deberá identificar las zonas de trabajo y acciones de cada institución participante. Se identificarán los principales rubros (cultivos) y temáticas de trabajo a nivel comunitario, municipal o departamental y las estaciones meteorológicas más cercanas a sus zonas de trabajo. Los resultados de esta sesión se presentará en plenaria.En la plenaria, los participantes de cada grupo deberán responder las siguientes preguntas: ¿Dónde trabaja usted (zonas, municipios)? ¿Por qué trabaja en esas zonas? ¿Cuáles son los principales rubros, actividades? ¿Qué cultivos? ¿Hay estaciones del servicio meteorológico cercanas en el municipio que seleccioné? ¿Mi institución tiene estaciones, dónde?  ¿Qué problemas tengo en esas zonas/cultivos relacionados con clima? ¿Qué información contenida en el boletín agroclimático puede ayudarme con estos problemas? ¿cuáles son los principales sectores y actividades en las que mujeres y hombres participan en el territorio? En consecuencia, ¿cuáles son los principales cultivos de los cuales son responsables las mujeres y los hombres en el territorio? Hay que tener en cuenta que mujeres y hombres pueden ser significativamente responsables de los mismos cultivos, pero pueden llevar a cabo diferentes actividades/tareas relacionadas con el cultivo, la cosecha, la post-cosecha, las ventas, etc.Después de terminar la primera reunión de la MTA, usted como facilitador debe realizar las siguientes actividades: Conformar un comité técnico cuyas principales funciones son la elaboración de las ayudas de memoria y los boletines agroclimáticos, las cuales son rotadas por los miembros del comité en cada reunión. Los criterios para la conformación de este comité tendrán en cuenta el rol y la motivación de las instituciones identificadas en la primera reunión. El comité también se encargará de apoyar al facilitador de la MTA con las fotos, logística de las reuniones (convocatoria, confirmación de asistencia, lugar de encuentro), y lista de asistencia. Con la información plasmada en los mapas y las hojas anexo, el facilitador de la MTA tiene la responsabilidad de digitalizar la información y consolidarla en un mapa final, lo anterior, hará parte de las memorias de la primera MTA. Tener la lista de asistencia en formato digital, crear una lista de correo de los participantes, y un grupo de WhatsApp para mantener informado a los integrantes de la MTA sobre las últimas noticias, eventos, y fechas de reunión, este grupo tendrá como único fin comunicar información relevante para los objetivos de la MTA. Organizar un plan de trabajo para presentarlo en la siguiente reunión, incluyendo la justificación, importancia, objetivos, metodología, líneas de acción, organización, recursos, y limitaciones. Elaboración de la agenda con los expositores, presentaciones y dinámicas. La agenda debe contener el tema que se va a tratar y dar el título a la misma, definiendo el orden de presentación de los subtemas. La forma de iniciación, generalmente consta de una introducción de bienvenida a la MTA, seguida de las exposiciones de predicción climática y el análisis agroclimático, Figura 6. Mesas de trabajo: Priorización de acciones y zonas de trabajo en Chiquimula -Guatemala trabajo participativo y las conclusiones y recomendaciones. La agenda de trabajo se construye de acuerdo a las necesidades y disponibilidad de recursos. El facilitador puede encargarse de invitar a los participantes como expositores para que presenten ante la MTA sus trabajos en la región o a otras personas que puedan exponer temas relacionados y de interés para la MTA.Ejemplo del mapa final:Paso 2 ¿Cómo presentar la información climática: histórica, monitoreo y pronósticos?Paso 2 -¿Cómo presentar la Información climática: histórica, monitoreo y pronósticos?Según BSA una empresa dedicada a la creación de soluciones de software (www.bsa.org), a lo largo de la historia de los seres humanos, los hitos de la civilización estuvieron marcados por avances en nuestra capacidad para observar y reunir información. Nuestros ancestros desarrollaron herramientas para medir la distancia, el peso, el volumen, la temperatura, el tiempo y el lugar -cada una fue mejorando con el tiempo y cada una fue fundamental para la transición de cazadores y recolectores a agricultores y a residentes de ciudades. Ya en el 6000 A.C., se utilizaron los datos del rendimiento de las cosechas y los ciclos de barbecho para incrementar la producción agrícola y alimentar a más gente. En el siglo XV, se utilizaron los datos del firmamento para navegar por el mundo y abrir los profundos mares al comercio global. En la década de 1850, se utilizaron los datos para relacionar los brotes de cólera con el clima y así salvar vidas.En el siglo XXI, estamos experimentando un aceleramiento de este proceso. A medida que los datos empiezan a abundar más y su costo de almacenamiento baja, las nuevas tecnologías les están proporcionando a los científicos de datos herramientas de vanguardia que dejan al descubierto valiosos conocimientos a partir de enormes cantidades de datos que adquieren características más transformadoras. Nos dirigimos a un mundo de información y posibilidades casi ilimitadas.La MTA debe asegurarse de tener en cuenta los conocimientos territoriales tradicionales sobre la variabilidad y el cambio climático y tener en cuenta las costumbres, medidas y prácticas que los agricultores mujeres y hombres usan para observar el clima y los problemas relacionados con el clima, según corresponda. La comprensión de las percepciones locales y el conocimiento del cambio climático y la variabilidad es fundamental para la comunicación efectiva de los pronósticos de tiempo y clima. Para esto es importante que se identifiquen y se generen procesos de formación técnica con énfasis en las mujeres, para mejorar sus habilidades, sobre todo en lo relacionado a temas de variabilidad y cambio climático, y de sensibilización de los hombres, para que se desarrolle de mejor manera el rol de las mujeres.Por lo anterior, los agricultores hace muchos años, comparten el reto de aprender a convivir con el clima para asegurar e incrementar su producción agrícola. Este enorme desafío sumado a la variabilidad climática, supone llevar a cabo estrategias de adaptación, y aunar esfuerzos para desarrollar recomendaciones de investigación que generen soluciones útiles, confiables y aplicables para mejorar la toma de decisiones. La información relativa a las condiciones climáticas del pasado, el presente y el futuro es importante para la elaboración de políticas y estrategias nacionales. Al finalizar este paso, los participantes de la MTA deberían comprender en esta segunda y tercera reunión de la MTA los siguientes conceptos:1. Conocer y aprender del clima pasado: Necesitamos una buena caracterización y análisis históricos desde el punto vista climático. Por lo anterior, necesitamos analizar las series de tiempo de las estaciones meteorológicas y sus métricas estadísticas más relevantes, asegurando el control de calidad de la información.2. Monitoreo del clima presente: Se pueden tomar medidas preventivas, con un buen monitoreo de las condiciones de clima; lo que está pasando y donde se van encendiendo esas alertas para tomar decisiones en tiempo cuasi-real, por ejemplo cuando aparece un plaga o enfermedad, que en una semana puede causar daños o incluso la perdida de nuestro cultivo. Por lo anterior, necesitamos conocer los productos de información a escala diaria, semanal, así como, las herramientas de monitoreo en tiempo real, que nos permitan tomar decisiones a corto plazo.3. Información relevante hacia futuro: El pronóstico climático ha tomado relevancia en los últimos años debido a su utilización como un instrumento básico en la planificación y toma de decisiones. Lo anterior, para diferentes sectores socio-económicos, incluyendo el agropecuario, dirigidos a la evaluación de riesgo ante fenómenos de variabilidad del clima para asegurar el abastecimiento de alimentos. Preguntas como esta ¿Cómo va estar el clima en mi próximo ciclo de cultivo?, son muy frecuentes en nuestros agricultores.• Proporcionar a los participantes la información climática de la zona que puedan utilizar para reflexionar sobre el clima y su variabilidad, compararla con la percepción que tienen del cambio, y sus efectos en los rubros productivos (ver Hoja de actividades 2a y 2b).• Los participantes comprendan que son los pronósticos a corto plazo y las alertas, cuales son las herramientas y productos que pueden consultar para obtener esta información y su utilidad (ver Hoja de actividades 2a). • Proporcionar a los participantes la predicción climática para los próximos 3 meses, así como, las ventajas y limitaciones en el uso de la información, y sus implicaciones para la toma de decisiones (ver Hoja de actividades 2d y 2e).Durante este paso usted debería facilitar: (con los expositores) Aplicar una encuesta (línea base) de conocimiento a los participantes sobre los conceptos asociados a esta segunda y tercera reunión. El entendimiento de dónde viene la información climática, y la interpretación de las gráficas y mapas climatológicos con los totales de precipitación anual, acumulados mensuales, números de días con lluvia. Con ejemplos, el análisis de las herramientas y productos de información disponibles de pronósticos a corto plazo y alertas, para que los participantes estén mejor preparados para tomar decisiones de acuerdo a los pronósticos y alertas que reciban. El conocimiento sobre qué es una predicción climática y cómo se genera. Asegurar que los participantes entiendan los conceptos asociados al pronóstico como son: probabilidad, terciles, análogos, incertidumbre, verificación y validación.La información climática histórica es esencial dentro del enfoque de la MTA. Es importante que los participantes conozcan de dónde viene dicha información y cómo ha sido colectada, para que puedan confiar en los resultados que se les presentan durante el paso 2d, también los datos de las estaciones en tiempo real serán la base para el monitoreo y posterior verificación de los pronósticos de tiempo y clima. El facilitador antes de convocar la segunda reunión de la MTA, debe tener en cuenta los temas a tratar y expositores para esta reunión. Por lo anterior, usted deberá considerar: Reunirse con el servicio meteorológico de su país para analizar la información histórica de la zona y solicitar la presenten en la MTA. Si lo anterior no es posible, deberá indagar con ellos la posibilidad de acceder a los productos de información históricos (mapas) y a las mismas series climáticas históricas de las estaciones meteorológicas priorizadas en el paso 1d. Contar con un profesional experto en clima para el procesamiento de la información de las estaciones meteorológicas 7 , dado el caso que la información no cuente con un proceso de control de calidad y el servicio meteorológico no pueda acompañar el proceso (no es la situación ideal).En este paso, antes de mostrar la información histórica de la zona, es importante impartir una serie de capacitaciones a los participantes de la MTA, aquí algunas sugerencias que pueden socializarse: Homologación de conceptos: Es importante explicar las diferencias entre tiempo y clima, qué es variabilidad y cambio climático, las escalas de variabilidad climática, los elementos meteorológicos. Estaciones meteorológicas: Muchas veces las instituciones a través de proyectos o donaciones instalan sus propias redes de estaciones meteorológicas, las cuales cuando el proyecto se acaba no tienen una sostenibilidad. Muchas estaciones terminan abandonadas y todo el esfuerzo que se hizo para construir una historia del clima a escala local queda desvanecido. Así que es importante dar una charla sobre: el rol de las estaciones meteorológicas, su clasificación, representatividad y sostenibilidad a lo largo de los años, ventajas y desventajas del tipo de estaciones; el enfoque es que esa estación instalada logre la determinación de una normal climatológica (30 años). Refuerzo de estadística con la herramienta RClimTool: El uso de datos históricos con la suficiente calidad y cantidad es de vital importancia para obtener resultados en modelación de cultivos y predicción climática con la mejor evaluación posible de las incertidumbres asociadas. Es común encontrar errores tipográficos, datos faltantes, atípicos y tendencias en la información de series de tiempo, lo que implica ejecutar un proceso minucioso para el control de calidad, estimación de la información faltante y análisis de las series. Por lo anterior, en el 2014 se desarrolló RClimTool, una interfaz en R de libre acceso y fácil uso. Necesitará la hoja de los metadatos de las estaciones meteorológicas que están instaladas en la zona con los siguientes datos: latitud, longitud, elevación, nombre de la institución a la que pertenece, temporalidad de la serie (número de años desde la instalación), % de datos faltantes. Así mismo, deberá asegurarse de tener a la mano la ficha técnica de la estación meteorológica y su estado actual. Necesitará entregar a los participantes de la MTA las gráficas de la climatología (30 años) de las estaciones en su zona para las variables disponibles (precipitaciones, temperaturas máximas) y las gráficas multianuales de toda la serie de datos disponible.Ejemplo Ficha técnica de la estación:Procedimiento 1. Cuando el expositor presente la charla sobre las estaciones meteorológicas. Reparta un ejemplo de la ficha técnica de una de las estaciones de la zona. Asegúrese de que los participantes comprendan: a. Cómo se miden las variables más importantes, cantidad de precipitación y temperaturas con un equipo estándar. b. Cómo se registra diariamente el total de precipitación y las temperaturas (máxima y mínima), y si esta información es colectada en forma manual o en tiempo real. 2. Pida al experto de clima explicar las gráficas de la climatología promedio mensual de las estaciones presentes en la zona de estudio, cuáles son las épocas secas, lluviosas, las temperaturas máximas y mínimas históricas a través de cada mes.Ejemplo presentación de información climatológica por estación:La fuente de esta grafica son datos del servicio meteorológico de Colombia -IDEAM y las gráficas elaboración CIAT.Ejemplo presentación de información climatológica a nivel espacial:Es importante que los participantes se familiaricen con la información climática existente en su zona, pero también comprendan qué es lo que llamamos la normal climatológica, que \"nuestra historia, el promedio\" está cambiando como consecuencia del cambio climático. Bajo este contexto, ¿cuántas medidas, estrategias de planificación o toma de decisiones se basan en esperar un año promedio? Se siembran cultivos en determinadas épocas porque en promedio la lluvia o la temperatura se comportan de tal manera. ¡Planificamos para un año que no va a existir! Por lo anterior, los objetivos de este paso son: Formar mesas de trabajo por rubros productivos según la experticia de los participantes para dibujar un calendario agroclimático con las actividades agropecuarias mes a mes, realizadas durante todo el año.  Con la serie histórica de la estación meteorológica de la zona (mínimo 20 años), los participantes tendrán la habilidad de identificar los años de altas y bajas precipitaciones, y relacionarlos con los eventos de El Niño y La Niña, y a su vez analizar y replantear el calendario de producción agrícola, pecuaria y de subsistencia cuando se presentan estos eventos y qué implicaciones tienen para las actividades.Al formar las mesas de discusión para desarrollar calendarios agroclimáticos de acuerdo con los sectores/cultivos clave, es importante considerar en cuáles actividades agrícolas/ganaderas/de subsistencia participan mujeres y hombres. Esto puede significar: formar un grupo de discusión específico para un cultivo o sector clave en el que las mujeres desempeñan un papel primordial (por ejemplo, las mujeres a menudo pueden participar significativamente en la pequeña producción ganadera en casos en América Latina, África subsahariana y Asia) y/o asegurándose de identificar aquellas actividades a las que contribuyen las mujeres y los hombres dentro de cada uno de los grupos que se forman (por ejemplo, tanto las mujeres como los hombres pueden desempeñar un papel importante en las actividades de cosecha y post-cosecha de café en Nicaragua; sin embargo, los hombres pueden ser en gran parte responsables del cultivo del café). Necesitará tres rotafolios y marcadores de colores para dibujar el calendario agroclimático. Necesitará imprimir los mapas de precipitación en un año característico El Niño y La Niña, y el índice oceánico ONI de la NOAA. Necesitará un juego completo de gráficas de la estación climática más reciente que se encuentre disponible. Saque copias suficientes, de modo que cada participante tenga un juego.1. Comience por hacer circular entre los grupos las gráficas de la climatología mensual de la estación de referencia y pídale a los integrantes que dibujen el calendario de actividades agrícolas, pecuarias o de subsistencia de acuerdo a la experticia de cada participante. Al finalizar el calendario agroclimático seleccione un representante de cada grupo para que pase y explique el calendario, de acuerdo a las siguientes preguntas:o ¿Qué actividades se realizan en el rubro asignado a cada grupo en los diferentes meses del año? o ¿Qué actividades realizan las mujeres y los hombres cada mes durante el año? o ¿Qué actividades son afectadas o beneficiadas por el clima y cómo?Figura 7. Calendario agroclimático del cultivo de Maíz 2. El experto en clima introducirá los fenómenos de variabilidad climática El Niño y La Niña, como se desarrollan, y como se calcula el índice, apoyado en la explicación de la tabla suministrada por la NOAA 8 . Como ejemplos utilizará los mapas suministrados por el servicio meteorológico, seleccionando años de referencia.3. Luego de entender los conceptos de El Niño y La Niña, se procede a entregar las gráficas de las series de tiempo de las estaciones meteorológicas cercanas de precipitación y temperaturas correlacionadas con el índice ONI. Los participantes responderán las siguientes preguntas de acuerdo a las gráficas:o ¿En qué año se presentaron sequías? o ¿En qué año se presentaron lluvias abundantes? o ¿Cree usted que el clima ha cambiado en los últimos 30 años? De ser así, ¿cómo cree usted que ha cambiado? o ¿Cree usted que hay más, menos o igual cantidad de lluvia? o ¿Ésta información es útil y cómo podría usted aprovecharla en sus planes/opciones/decisiones?Ejemplo presentación de información de la serie histórica:Así como la información climática es la base para generar nuestro boletín agroclimático, es importante que los participantes de la MTA se familiaricen con la información de tiempo 9 (corto plazo): ¿cuáles son las herramientas y productos que pueden consultar para obtener esta información y como pueden ser útiles en la toma de decisiones? La información en tiempo real de las estaciones meteorológicas o los mapas suministrados por los servicios meteorológicos de los próximos días (1-10 días) es información valiosaManual de implementación Mesa Técnica Agroclimática (MTA) Guía detallada -paso a pasopara tomar decisiones en el sector agropecuario, tales como la preparación de labores antes de la siembra, la aplicación de fertilizantes, labores específicas de nuestro cultivo (secado de granos) o el control de plagas y enfermedades.Por lo anterior, tener información de estaciones meteorológicas automáticas con información cercano a tiempo real nos permite realizar un seguimiento continuo de las condiciones diarias en épocas claves de nuestro cultivo como una herramienta de monitoreo. Si no contamos con información de estaciones meteorológicas automáticas, podemos consultar herramientas como información de radar o imágenes de satélites, esta última como un insumo clave para la era de la agricultura de precisión. Por lo anterior los objetivos de este paso antes de finalizar la segunda reunión de la MTA son: Reunirse con el servicio meteorológico de su país para conocer los productos de información relacionados con el estado del tiempo. Se debe asegurar que para cada MTA se presente dicha información 10  Dar a conocer graficas de interés para la agricultura con los datos diarios procesados de las estaciones meteorológicas: variación de inicio y finalización de la estación lluviosa, duración de la estación lluviosa, numero de periodos de sequía, duración del periodo de sequía más largo, lluvias extremas. Dar a conocer que es el estado del tiempo, su pronóstico y las fuentes de consulta  Introducir los conceptos de ondas (MJO), huracanes y frentes, su pronóstico y las fuentes consultaEn este paso, es importante impartir una serie de capacitaciones a los participantes de la MTA, aquí algunas sugerencias que pueden socializarse:• Dar a conocer el funcionamiento de un radar y cómo interpretar su información • Dar a conocer qué es una imagen de satélite, cómo se interpreta y dónde consultar dicha información en tiempo real.• Necesitará entregar a los participantes de la mesa las gráficas de variación de inicio y finalización de la estación lluviosa, duración de la estación lluviosa, número de periodos de sequía, duración del periodo de sequía más largo, lluvias extremas.1. Si no hay suficiente tiempo para tratar cada una de las gráficas, pida a los participantes que seleccionen las dos o tres gráficas que ellos consideren más útiles para discutir. Busque un espacio donde se puedan desplegar todas las gráficas para que todos las puedan ver y participar de la discusión.Ejemplo presentación con información diaria de las estaciones meteorológicas:Pida a los participantes que respondan las siguientes preguntas, de acuerdo a la gráfica y al conocimiento de la zona: ¿En qué épocas del año llueve más en la primera o segunda época?  ¿En qué época del año los días con lluvia son más constantes?  ¿En qué época siembran sus cultivos y en que variables basa esta decisión?Pida a los participantes que respondan las siguientes preguntas, de acuerdo a la gráfica y al conocimiento de la zona:• ¿De acuerdo a la gráfica, por qué varía cada año la fecha de inicio de lluvias?• ¿Qué impactos tiene para sus cultivos un retraso o adelanto en la fecha de inicio de lluvias?• ¿La gráfica es útil, y cómo podría usted aprovecharla en sus planes/opciones/decisiones? Pida a los participantes que respondan las siguientes preguntas, de acuerdo a la gráfica y al conocimiento de la zona:• ¿Qué etapas de su cultivo son las más sensibles a periodos largos de días sin lluvias?• ¿Cuántos días sin lluvia consecutivos tiene un impacto en su cultivo?• ¿La grafica es útil y cómo podría usted aprovecharla en sus planes/opciones/decisiones? 2. Después de la trasferencia de capacidades, y asegurando que los participantes de la MTA conocen el concepto de pronóstico del estado del tiempo, su interpretación y fuentes de consulta (páginas web). Pida al experto de clima que explique el consenso del pronóstico de tiempo para los próximos días para la zona de estudio. 3. Pida a los participantes que como ejercicio y previamente capacitados en el tema interpreten una imagen de satélite, lo anterior les ayudara a entender la información satelital cuando sea presentada en la MTA o enviada como parte del monitoreo de las condiciones diarias en el grupo de Whatapps.La predicción del clima se basa en la comprensión de las interacciones que existen entre los océanos y la atmósfera, que nos permiten conocer mejor el clima en un horizonte de tiempo futuro (1 -3 meses) (Martínez et al., 2011). Si bien, la variabilidad climática es una de las principales fuentes de riesgos de producción (Fraisse et al., 2006), beneficios significativos han surgido a partir del uso de pronósticos de tiempo y clima como una herramienta fundamental para reducir los riesgos de la producción agrícola y apoyar la toma de decisiones de siembra, variedades, insumos, manejo, y demás.Al proporcionar información local a los pequeños agricultores traducida junto con los servicios de extensión (Ortega et al., 2018), los agricultores están mejor preparados para protegerse de los fenómenos extremos y aprovechar las buenas condiciones climáticas. Por lo anterior, los objetivos de esta tercera reunión de la MTA son: Conocer la metodología y productos de información en la generación de predicciones climáticas por el servicio meteorológico de su país, asegurando que para cada MTA se presente dicha información como el insumo principal para la construcción del boletín agroclimático.  Dar a conocer a los participantes de la MTA que es la predicción climática, como se genera (estadístico dinámico), modelos dinámicos y estadísticos de consulta de la predicción, y sus fuentes de incertidumbre.  Explicar a la MTA de una manera didáctica y con ejemplos claros los conceptos de terciles, años análogos, probabilidad e incertidumbre Nota importante: Antes de convocar la tercera reunión de la MTA, el experto de clima debe asegurar que el servicio meteorológico cuenta con una evaluación retrospectiva de las predicciones climáticas para su región. Ya que la primera pregunta que surge en la MTA es cuantas veces ha sido acertada o se ha equivocado la predicción climática. Para lo anterior, ver artículo de Esquivel et al., 2018.• Bolsa con 10 pelotas de cada color (rojo, verde, azul) • Necesitará entregar a los participantes de la MTA un ejemplo de una gráfica de la serie histórica de los próximos meses en consideración, con la definición de los terciles.Entregará la gráfica de la precipitación acumulada de la serie histórica durante el trimestre en consideración • Entregará la predicción climática en probabilidades de los próximos meses a los participantes Procedimiento 1. Con dinámicas se introducirán los conceptos de:Manual de implementación Mesa Técnica Agroclimática (MTA) Guía detallada -paso a paso -3. Años análogos: La metodología de análogos tiene como objetivo aproximarse a años que experimentaron condiciones climáticas similares, tanto estadísticamente como en la dinámica de procesos océano-atmosféricos. Pero, es importante recordar que este debe ser un método exploratorio, ya que para encontrar análogos naturales se necesita información de muchos años. En la gráfica de lado izquierdo se muestra los posible años con condiciones análogos para el mes de referencia de pronóstico, lo anterior se contrasta con un análisis de la precipitación acumulada de la serie histórica para el periodo de referencia y su posible comportamiento a años análogos.4. Predicción climática de los próximos meses: La incorporación de modelos de estructura estadística, como el de Análisis de Correlación Canónica (ACC), con ayuda de la herramienta CPT 12 (Climate Predictability Tool) desarrollada por el IRI (Instituto Internacional de Investigación sobre el Clima y la Sociedad, de la Universidad de Columbia, EE.UU.) y utilizada en muchos países para la predicción operativa del clima, permite poner en marcha un programa para realizar predicciones periódicas en una forma rápida y fácil y así suministrar perspectivas climáticas en la escala temporal de meses.Figura 12. Grafica de terciles para una serie climática y metodología de cálculo Figura 13. Años análogos a nivel espacial y precipitación acumulada de la serie históricaManual de implementación Mesa Técnica Agroclimática (MTA) Guía detallada -paso a paso -Ya con los conceptos claros por parte de los participantes de la MTA de que es una predicción climática y su interpretación, se procede a entregar la gráfica de la predicción climática de los próximos meses y su fuente de consulta. Es importante no confundir a los participantes presentando varias fuentes de predicción climática, ya que el experto de clima debería presentar el consenso (dinámico y estadístico) final de la predicción y sus fuentes de incertidumbre.Usted debe asegurar que la información de la predicción esté disponible en la Web como fuente oficial en la página del servicio meteorológico y sea actualizada al menos cada tres meses como insumo principal para la generación del boletín agroclimático. Algunos ejemplos puede consultarlos en la página del foro regional de clima Centroamericano 14 y en la página de Clima y sector agropecuario Colombiano 15 .Si bien las predicciones tienen un elemento de incertidumbre, en particular para periodos de tiempo más largos, la retroalimentación con los usuarios que usaron este tipo de información sugieren que la misma les da una orientación útil en la planificación. Por ello, es fundamental establecer una relación fuerte entre los generadores de las predicciones climáticas y los usuarios para el entendimiento de sus necesidades.Paso 3Paso 3 -Información de cultivo: agronomía y modelos de cultivoSegún la Organización Meteorológica Mundial -OMM los servicios agroclimáticos sean convertido en una herramienta esencial para hacer frente a los cambios en la producción agrícola debido al incremento de la variabilidad, asociado con eventos extremos y el cambio climático. Por ejemplo, la diseminación de información meteorológica convertida en índices de importancia para la agricultura permite al agricultor tomar decisiones tácticas de planeación de su cultivo a corto plazo e las diferentes etapas del cultivo que se pueden traducir en impactos económicos como reducir la aplicación de insumos químicos para el control de una plaga o enfermedad o el uso eficiente del recurso agua. Independiente del tipo de decisión, es importante mejorar el entendimiento de los efectos del tiempo y clima sobre los cultivos para asegurar el uso de esta información de forma adecuada y en el momento preciso.El uso de modelos de cultivo ha avanzado rápidamente en los últimos 30 años con el objetivo de proveer las ecuaciones que describen la fisiología de la planta y como estos procesos son afectados por el genotipo, ambiente y prácticas de manejo agronómico (Wheeler et al., 2007). Para el uso de estos modelos se requiere así como clima una serie histórica de los parámetros importantes de nuestro cultivo de estudio para ser ajustados y verificados, así como la opinión del experto en el cultivo. Para hacer los análisis agroclimáticos, las predicciones climáticas se convierten en predicciones agroclimáticas locales, con apoyo del uso de modelos y/o conocimiento del experto de cultivo para responder las preguntas más frecuentes del agricultor: ¿Qué cultivo/variedad puedo sembrar? ¿Cuál será la fecha optima se siembra de mi cultivo? ¿Mi cultivo tendrá el agua necesaria para desarrollarse? ¿Cuál será el rendimiento de mi cultivo?Al finalizar este paso, los participantes de la MTA deberían comprender en esta tercera reunión de la MTA como planificar las actividades agrícolas basados en la disponibilidad de información de predicción de tiempo y clima, que tipo de variables climáticas afectan más mi cultivo y son relevantes para la planificación de nuestras actividades en el cultivo. Aplicar una encuesta de conocimientos sobe lo aprendido en el paso 2.  Los participantes generan un nuevo calendario de planificación de sus actividades agrícolas de acuerdo con la predicción climática dada de los próximos meses  Conocer cuáles son los factores climáticos más limitantes en el desarrollo de los cultivos presentes en la MTA, así como sus requerimientos hídricos.  Los participantes comprendan cómo funcionan los modelos de cultivo y su importancia como herramienta de planificación.Cuando los participantes conocen como se genera la información climática, se ha analizado la historia, monitoreado el presente, y como interpretar la predicción climática, se procede a retomar el calendario agroclimático de la actividad 2b trabajando con la historia, para discutir qué cambios se harían en la planificación de los cultivos dada la predicción climática y que otro tipo de información climática (variables y escalas) serían relevantes para el cultivo. También, es importante continuar formando grupos de discusión que aborden los sectores productivos y las actividades relevantes para mujeres y hombres. Por lo anterior, los objetivos de este paso son:  Formar mesas de trabajo por rubros productivos según la experticia de los participantes para re-dibujar un calendario agroclimático con la planificación de las actividades agropecuarias dada la predicción climática.  Discutir los requerimientos y demandas de información climática para la planificación de mi próximo cultivo Necesitaras retomar los calendarios agroclimáticos históricos  Necesitará los rotafolios y marcadores de colores para dibujar el nuevo calendario agroclimático.  Necesitará imprimir las hojas con la predicción climática1. Es importante que en este punto se retome una homologación de conceptos entre todos los participantes sobre que es: a. Medida de adaptación b. Modelo de cultivo c. Vulnerabilidad d. Impacto 2. Comience por hacer circular entre los grupos las gráficas de la predicción climática de los próximos meses y pídale a los integrantes que modifiquen el calendario de actividades agrícolas, pecuarias o de subsistencia de acuerdo a la predicción. Al finalizar el calendario agroclimático seleccione un representante de cada grupo para que pase y explique el calendario, de acuerdo a las siguientes preguntas: ¿Qué actividades realizo en el cultivo diferente a las tradicionales dada la predicción?  ¿Cuál de las actividades de hombres y mujeres se llevaría a cabo de manera diferente dada la predicción?  ¿Qué otro tipo de variables y escalas de información climática necesito para tomar decisiones?Tomando como ejemplo el caso de las mujeres involucradas en la producción de ganado de especies menores, los pronósticos de fuertes lluvias e inundaciones podrían influir en la decisión de vacunar a las gallinas de sus hogares. En consecuencia, ¿qué otras variables y escalas de tiempo de información climática necesitarían mujeres y hombres para tomar decisiones?Los resultados de las predicciones climáticas, se distribuyen entre los participantes para que puedan establecer relaciones con los factores de la producción agrícola, asimismo se constituirán en datos de entrada en los modelos de cultivos que analizan diferentes medidas agronómicas de adaptación, en un clima cambiante. Las predicciones climáticas locales determinísticas se convierten en Figura 15. Variables y escalas de información climática necesarias para la planificación del cultivo de Maíz en el 2014-II semestre dado un evento de lluvias por encima de lo normal.predicciones agroclimáticas locales, con apoyo de modelaciones clima-suelo-agua-manejo (con modelos CROPWAT 16 , AQUACROP 17 , entre otros), para responder preguntas como: ¿Qué pasa si adelanto o retraso mi fecha de siembra? ¿Cuánta y con qué frecuencia necesita agua mi cultivo? Por lo anterior, los objetivos de este paso son: Conocer cuáles son las etapas fisiológicas de cada cultivo y sus requerimientos hídricos.  Que los expertos en cada cultivo den a conocer los factores que limitan la producción.  Dar una presentación sobre aplicaciones de los modelos de cultivos y su importancia como herramienta de planificación.En este paso, es importante impartir una serie de capacitaciones a los participantes de la MTA, aquí algunas sugerencias que pueden socializarse: Dar a conocer la metodología para traducir las probabilidades de la predicción climática en escenarios determinísticos basados en la historia climática de la serie.  Dar a conocer que es un modelo de cultivo y las partes que lo integran.  Realizar sesiones prácticas de corridas con los modelos CropWat y AquaCropEntregar los datos mensuales de precipitación de los últimos 5 años para la estación cercana • Necesitará entregar a los participantes un rotafolio para que ellos grafiquen las etapas fenológicas vs los requerimientos hídricos.Necesitaras entregar a los participantes una hoja del modelo de cultivo con las variables para completar cada módulo de cultivo Procedimiento 1. Formar grupos por experticia de cultivos, en el cual graficarán la duración de las etapas fenológicas del cultivo y los requerimientos hídricos ideales en (mm). Luego se les entregará los datos de precipitación mensual de los últimos 5 años, los participantes escogerán un año de interés el cual graficaran junto la curva de requerimientos ideales. Otro indicador interesante es contabilizar número de días con lluvias en relación a cada etapa fenológica.Figura 16. Grafica de requerimientos hídricos del cultivo de frijol comparado con la precipitación real de una época de cultivo y su número asociado de días con lluvia.Manual de implementación Mesa Técnica Agroclimática (MTA) Guía detallada -paso a paso -Con el uso de los modelos mencionados se analiza la sensibilidad de los cultivos, ya que permiten determinar los impactos de ocurrencia de eventos climáticos como El Niño, La Niña y otros que generen condiciones pluviales extremas, en el desarrollo (en etapas fenológicas críticas) y productividad de esos cultivos. De este modo con los modelos será posible diferenciar la sensibilidad de cada uno de los cultivos analizados, así como de sus fases fenológicas críticas, ante la ocurrencia de variaciones climáticas desfavorables. Este análisis permite definir medidas adaptativas orientadas a un mejor uso y manejo del recurso hídrico regional disponible.2. Un recorrido por los modelos de cultivo: Preguntar a los participantes en una sesión abierta sobre cuáles variables debe considerar un modelo de cultivo, luego agrupar las variables de acuerdo con los módulos encontrados en los modelos con el propósito de consolidar los conocimientos sobre el funcionamiento de un modelo de cultivo y sus diferentes módulos e interacciones. Los participantes completaran un esquema del modelo AquaCrop con las diferentes variables entregadas como fichas.Figura 17. Actividad \"AquaCrop\" un recorrido hacia las funciones, variables y módulos.\"Paso 4Paso 4 -Toma de decisiones dada la predicción agroclimáticaSegún la Comisión de meteorología agrícola (CAgM, siglas en inglés) de la Organización Meteorológica mundial (OMM), los servicios agro meteorológicos en los países en desarrollo deben asumir mayores responsabilidades debido a la mayor presión de la población y los modos cambiantes de las prácticas agrícolas. En el futuro, se esperan cada vez más demandas de información y servicios agrometeorológicos con respecto a las tecnologías, los sistemas y patrones agrícolas, la gestión del agua y el control de plagas y enfermedades basadas en el clima, preferiblemente con innovaciones locales como puntos de partida. Por lo tanto, los desafíos futuros incluirán la necesidad de enfatizar un enfoque de abajo hacia arriba para asegurar que los pronósticos, las alertas tempranas y la planificación de contingencia lleguen incluso a los pequeños agricultores, de modo que puedan aplicar esta información en su planificación y en el desarrollo agrícola diario.En esta cuarta reunión se debe tener el conjunto de prácticas de seleccionadas a través de múltiples procesos analíticos y participativos que refleja el deseo colectivo de promover un sector agropecuario productivo y adaptado al clima. Para estos fines, se deben tomar decisiones con respecto a la combinación correcta y la combinación de estrategias de adaptación tradicionales, conocimiento del agricultor con la ciencia y tecnología, y entornos de políticas apropiados. Conocer cómo se generan los portafolios de medidas sostenibles adaptadas al clima con ejemplos claros.  Generar el portafolio de medidas para las zonas de influencia de la MTA y analizar los cuellos de botella para la no implementación de estas por parte de los agricultores.  Seleccionar las medidas de adaptación a promover con los agricultores dada la predicción climáticaEsta parte corresponde a la formulación de un portafolio de prácticas de Agricultura Sostenible Adaptada al Clima (ASAC) 18 , que se ajusten a las condiciones del territorio en el cual se implementa la MTA.Existen principalmente dos tipos de prácticas ASAC y corresponden a aquellas de corto plazo y aquellas de mediano o largo plazo. Las prácticas de corto plazo son las que se pueden tomar de forma inmediata como respuesta a las predicciones climáticas, con el objetivo de reducir o evitar los posibles impactos del clima sobre los cultivos. Un ejemplo de una práctica de corto plazo sería la selección para la siembra de una variedad de frijol de ciclo corto (precoz), como respuesta a un pronóstico de reducción de periodo de lluvias habitual. Por su parte, las prácticas de mediano y largo plazo son aquellas que responden a eventos recurrentes y aumentan de forma permanente la resiliencia de los sistemas productivos.Un ejemplo de prácticas de mediano plazo es el uso de compostaje en zonas secas con poca retención de agua en los suelos, ya que esta medida tiene un efecto inmediato sobre la nutrición del cultivo, pero a la vez con su uso recurrente va mejorando la estructura del suelo, permitiendo al cabo de unos ciclos de cultivo una mayor retención de agua en el suelo. Finalmente, un ejemplo de una práctica de largo plazo es la siembra de árboles como barreras vivas rompevientos, con el fin de evitar el volcamiento de cultivos como el maíz. Esta práctica es de largo plazo, ya que después de sembrados los arboles el tiempo de crecimiento de estos es prolongado, lo que significa que los efectos de la práctica se verán reflejados sobre los cultivos varios años después.Con base en la explicación anterior el objetivo de este paso es:  Construir un amplio portafolio de prácticas ASAC tanto de corto como de mediano y largo plazo, el cual debe ser retroalimentado constantemente entre los distintos integrantes de la mesa con el fin de incluir ideas innovadoras que respondan a los retos climáticos. Necesitará un proyector para presentaciones de diapositivas y consolidación de una hoja de Excel con el portafolio de medidas ASAC1. Coordinar previo a la reunión de la primera MTA con un representante de CCAFS, para dar una presentación sobre las prácticas ASAC y los tres pilares sobre los cuales están fundamentadas (adaptación, mitigación, y productividad y seguridad alimentaria). 2. Compartir con los participantes un listado con algunas prácticas ASAC, como insumo para iniciar la discusión y poder enriquecer el portafolio. 3. De acuerdo al número de participantes, las instituciones en que trabajan y/o los cultivos de interés de la zona, divida en grupos de trabajo de máximo 10 personas. El objetivo es que en conjunto revisen y discutan las prácticas propuestas, con el objetivo de descartar las que no sea relevantes para la región e incluir las ideas nuevas que surjan de los grupos de trabajo. 4. Al final en plenaria los grupos van a argumentar porqué descartaron algunas prácticas y por qué incluyeron otras, y con base en esta plenaria se consolidará una versión regional de portafolio de prácticas ASAC, las cuales servirán como insumo para desarrollar estrategias de corto plazo dependiendo de los pronósticos climáticos discutidos en cada MTA y de mediano y largo plazo con base en las estadísticas multianuales de eventos climáticos recurrentes. 5. A partir de la segunda sesión de las MTA, el portafolio de prácticas ASAC podrá ser enriquecido durante cada sesión, ya que es probable los integrantes de la misma con el tiempo desarrollen o conozcan nuevas prácticas innovadoras que permitan hacer más resilientes los sistemas productivos.Ejemplo de portafolio de prácticas:Este ejemplo es parte del marco de priorización de prácticas sostenibles adaptadas al clima en el corredor seco en Guatemala con apoyo del Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Alimentación de Guatemala (MAGA) con el objetivo de identificar, priorizar y promover las prácticas o tecnologías agrícolas que contribuyan al logro de los objetivos planteados, a través de un esfuerzo integrado en tres pilares fundamentales: el fortalecimiento de la seguridad alimentaria por medio del incremento de la productividad de forma sostenible, el aumento la capacidad de adaptación de los agricultores y el desarrollo agropecuario bajo en emisiones a través de la reducción/eliminación de gases de efecto invernadero (mitigación).El aporte de los participantes que integran la MTA es el de buscar y promover las medidas adaptivas en su región en los rubro productivos priorizados con el grupo de agricultores y/o usuarios del boletín agroclimático, con base en las predicciones climáticas presentadas para los próximos meses. En este paso, se plantean soluciones conjuntas a los problemas planteados, se discuten ideas, se toman decisiones, en lo que se refiere a acciones que contribuyan a reducir el impacto ante las anomalías climáticas y evaluaciones agroclimáticas presentadas. En Colombia lo anterior se realiza a través de un panel de expertos, por rubro productivo se reúnen y se discuten bajo la predicción climática dada cuáles serán las recomendaciones seleccionadas. El objetivo de este paso es: Dado el portafolio de prácticas sostenibles adaptadas al clima identificadas para la región y cultivo de interés de las actividades 4a, seleccionar aquellas medidas respuesta dada la predicción climática. Entregar impreso el portafolio de prácticas sostenibles adaptadas al clima desarrolladas en la actividad 4a  Necesitará rotafolios y marcadores de colores para escribirEn esta etapa se hace un trabajo en grupo con los participantes de la MTA. Los grupos pueden conformarse de acuerdo a los temas o competencia en sus trabajos y las entidades que representan (por ejemplo grupos de suelos, agua y cultivos). Cada grupo tiene que responder las siguientes preguntas: ¿Cuáles son los impactos (positivos o negativos) en los rubros productivos priorizados dada la predicción climática?  ¿Qué medidas o prácticas de adaptación puedo seleccionar dada la predicción climática?  ¿Qué recomendaciones daría a qué agricultores (mujeres, hombres, de diferentes grupos sociales), dada la predicción del clima?  ¿Cuál es mi compromiso para promover estas prácticas en mi región? Figura 18. Foto de la MTA en Cauca, durante el análisis por grupos temáticos, sobre medidas adaptativas para el sector agrícola local, según predicciones y análisis previos Paso 5Paso 5 -Generación del boletín agroclimático Al finalizar la cuarta reunión se debe contar con un borrador del boletín agroclimático debe reflejar la recolección de resultados y análisis elaborados en cada uno de los pasos de la MTA. Es importante que después de realizada la MTA, en los siguientes 3 días (máximo) sea generado el boletín agroclimático que será enviado a los participantes de la para su revisión y adiciones, y en los dos días subsiguientes publicado 19 .Construcción del boletín agroclimático, se recomienda la siguiente estructura:1. Logos de las instituciones participantes en la MTA 2. Información de la climatología para los meses de referencia 3. Diagnóstico sobre la evolución y seguimiento del fenómeno meteorológico actual influyente en el comportamiento meteorológico (precipitación, temperatura, viento) de la región (ejemplo el fenómeno El Niño/La Niña) o la temporada de Huracanes. 4. Verificación de la predicción climática realizada en la reunión anterior 5. Predicción climática local para los próximos meses. 6. Evaluaciones y perspectivas agroclimáticas. 7. Conclusiones y recomendaciones agroclimáticas provenientes de los actores participantes en la MTA (medidas adaptativas para los cultivos de interés). En este paso es importante pedir insumos como fotos de los cultivos que reflejen el trabajo de las instituciones en la región.A continuación para cada uno de los numerales se mostrara ejemplos del boletín agroclimático de los departamentos de Cauca y Córdoba 20 en Colombia:Paso 6Paso 6 -Difusión del boletín agroclimático Además de conocer información climática relevante hacia futuro, es necesario buscar alternativas de manejo agrícola para adaptarse a tales condiciones e implementar mecanismos eficaces que puedan ser sostenibles, bajo un marco de comunicación efectiva con el agricultor (Jones, 2003;Pulwarty et al., 2003). Según Podestá et al. (2002) y Bert et al. (2006), se necesitan varias condiciones para el uso efectivo de las predicciones climáticas en la mejora de la toma de decisiones:  La información debe ser relevante, traducida y compatible con las decisiones de producción, llegando en momentos adecuados y con apropiada resolución geográfica y temporal.  Deben de existir diferentes alternativas que pueden ser tomadas en respuesta a las predicciones climáticas, y que dan resultados bajo diferentes escenarios climáticos.  Los tomadores de decisiones pueden evaluar (p. ej. económicamente) los resultados de estas acciones alternativas.  Los tomadores de decisiones tienen la voluntad de adoptar un manejo adaptativo al clima en un contexto complejo de toma de decisiones. Podestá et al. (2002) y sus coautores destacan que un elemento clave que facilita el uso de los pronósticos del clima, es un sistema de herramientas de soporte a la toma de decisiones para evaluar los impactos de las alternativas implementadas. Además, la información traducida que proviene de fuentes confiables tales como agentes de extensión agrícola o asesores técnicos tiene más probabilidad de ser tomada en cuenta.En un estudio de campo, Patt et al. (2005) muestran que agricultores de subsistencia que aplican los pronósticos durante varios años para tomar decisiones mejoran significativamente sus cosechas. Además, muestran que los agricultores que han asistido a breves talleres participativos y han aprendido más sobre los pronósticos son significativamente más propensos a utilizarlos que los agricultores que aprendieron sobre los pronósticos a través de canales no participativos.Los factores basados en género pueden influir en que las mujeres y los hombres tengan un acceso diferente a los canales de comunicación. Por ejemplo, finanzas limitadas a menudo pueden impedir que las mujeres posean TICs (Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación) y los activos de comunicación, como teléfonos celulares y radios. Además, debido a las diferencias en la alfabetización, el conocimiento técnico y los niveles de escolaridad, los hombres pueden ser más capaces de interpretar los formatos de las TICs (Gumucio et al., 2018b) . Las responsabilidades del hogar pueden limitar el tiempo disponible de las mujeres para escuchar también los programas agrícolas por radio (Gumucio et al., 2018c) Objetivos de este paso: Los participantes de la mesa tienen la responsabilidad de difundir la información técnica agroclimática generada en las MTA, centrada en las necesidades de los agricultores, que faciliten la toma de decisiones y la gestión de riesgo del sector agropecuario.Un punto relevante de las MTA es generar información agroclimática, pero también divulgarla entre instituciones, servicios de extensión, hacia los agricultores, entre otros actores locales, regionales que se consideren relevantes, que podrían hacer buen uso de la información suministrada. Para esto se utilizan diferentes medios de comunicación como la prensa, la radio y los servicios de redes sociales como correos electrónicos y grupos Whatsapp, que sirven para divulgar el trabajo que adelanta la MTA, le da identidad a la misma y representa una mejora para el buen desempeño de estas a escala regional, permitiendo la difusión de toda la información agro meteorológica a los integrantes y a la comunidad en general. Otros medios de difusión constituye la realización de Foros, Seminarios y Talleres.A continuación se da a conocer algunos ejemplos de difusión: La difusión de la información debe ser de doble vía (intercambio de información y conocimiento), para que haya oportunidad en la información, es decir, que llegue al productor local (las comunidades), que se entienda, sea utilizada y genere un cambio mental dirigido hacia la generación de capacidades de adaptación ante el clima cambiante. Las comunidades deben adquirir conocimiento en aspectos climáticos locales, recolección y suministro oportuno de información agro meteorológica local. Lo anterior, implica iniciar un proceso de cambio de actitud y aptitud en las comunidades, desde que perciben la existencia del problema que afecta su realidad, y se genera la necesidad de enfrentarlo.  Conocer el canal de comunicación preferido por los agricultores locales: Boletín físico, Mensaje de texto (celular), Radio y Prensa. Como ejemplo, en la MTA de Cauca como territorio de Postconflicto en Colombia asisten soldados y oficiales para capacitarse en temas de agro climatología y lograr difundir esta información a los campesinos para la adaptación de la agricultura a la variabilidad climática con información local.  Aprovechar la participación de los comunicadores locales, los periodistas (prensa, radio), mediante un acercamiento para hacer un análisis de la difusión de la información para que sea efectivo. Es importante que la MTA considere las preferencias de los agricultores hombres y mujeres. Esto implica aprovechar los diferentes tipos de fuentes de información relevantes a nivel local y los formatos disponibles (por ejemplo, mensajes SMS, radio, pizarras meteorológicas, personas influyentes). También puede ser útil identificar contactos clave en la comunidad.Por ejemplo, las mujeres que poseen su propio teléfono celular pueden compartir información recibida con otros familiares y amigos. De manera similar, las intervenciones deben garantizar que el uso de las TICs o los dispositivos de medios sea compatible con las actividades de subsistencia de las mujeres y/o que ahorre tiempo.  Tener en cuenta que las normas e instituciones socioculturales relativas a las interacciones entre mujeres y hombres, el espacio y la movilidad pueden limitar la participación de las mujeres en grupos donde se comparte información sobre el clima. Incluir a los grupos de mujeres como canales de comunicación puede ser una forma importante de responder a estos desafíos.Las \"comunicadoras\" mujeres también pueden facilitar el acceso de las mujeres agricultoras a la información agroclimática clave.Paso 7Paso 7 -Implementación de medidas de adaptaciónDado el aumento en la frecuencia de eventos hidro meteorológicos extremos, asociados a la variabilidad climática y/o cambio climático, y la mayor vulnerabilidad de las sociedades humanas frente a estas amenazas, se presenta un mayor interés en la implementación de medidas de adaptación sostenibles adaptadas al clima. Teniendo en cuenta, que la adaptación y la gestión del riesgo, deben integrase con una visión holística para reducir la vulnerabilidad de los agricultores.El conjunto de medidas de adaptación identificadas deberían ser de interés y beneficio para mujeres y hombres. No obstante, la MTA debe considerar que el control limitado de los recursos y la falta de oportunidades para participar en la toma de decisiones agrícolas pueden restringir significativamente la capacidad de las mujeres para hacer un uso completo de la información climática y aplicar medidas, en algunos casos. Los hombres tienden a poseer el equipo agrícola, el ganado y la tierra necesarios, más a menudo que las mujeres. Además, las normas socioculturales arraigadas con respecto a los roles y responsabilidades agrícolas y de los hogares pueden impedir que las mujeres participen en los procesos de toma de decisiones relevantes para abordar los riesgos climáticos.Es de suma importancia evaluar los desafíos que mujeres y hombres pueden enfrentar de manera diferente para implementar las medidas de adaptación identificadas y buscar oportunidades para coordinarse con otras iniciativas/actores de desarrollo para abordar las limitaciones de recursos productivos de los grupos más marginados. Es importante coordinar con socios locales como municipalidades y mancomunidades para brindar un mayor apoyo a planes de adaptación que mejoren o mantengan los medios de vida de las familias rurales. Implementar las medidas de adaptación seleccionadas de acuerdo a predicciones climáticas y análisis agroclimáticos de modo participativo entre especialistas externos (investigadores, académicos, técnicos) y comunidades (conocedores locales), que trabajan de modo integrado en talleres y jornadas de campo.A continuación unos ejemplo de la ficha técnica de implementación de las medidas de adaptación:Número de la medida: 2 Nombre de la medida: Construcción de sistema de cosecha de aguas lluviasComo mejora la capacidad de adaptación: Permite almacenar agua para disponer de ella en verano; asociada a un sistema de riego por goteo puede contribuir a la seguridad alimentaria La escasez de agua en el Territorio Sostenible Adaptado al Clima en Cauca, ha limitado las posibilidades de obtener alimentos a partir de la huerta familiar en épocas de sequía, incrementando la vulnerabilidad de los productores locales a los efectos adversos de la sequía. A través de la instalación de sistemas de cosecha de agua, propone contribuir con la disminución de la vulnerabilidad identificada de manera participativa con la comunidad.Para esto asociamos la medida de \"Cosechas de Aguas Lluvias\", a otras medidas complementarias como son: a. Riego por goteo; b. Huertas circulares, c. Huertas tradicionales con cubiertas o c. Huertas verticales, y d. cuando sea posible, a Reservorios con cubierta plástica. El diseño propuesto consiste en aprovechar el agua de las cubiertas de casas y otra infraestructura, recogiéndola por medio de canales fabricadas a partir de secciones longitudinales de tubos de PVC de 6\", para recolectarla en un tanque plástico (ver Foto) cuyo sobrante puede ser a su vez, recogido en reservorios para ser usada principalmente como fuente de riego en épocas de sequíaPASO A PASO COSECHA AGUAS LLUVIAS Defina la localización del tanque y las canales Mida el largo de las canales, si estas tienen más de 6 metros, hay que pegar dos tubos mediante unión de PVC de 6\" Pegue dos tubos de 6\" por medio de unión, teniendo en cuenta que los letreros de los tubos coincidan. Esto le ayudara a guiar el corte Marque el lado opuesto a los letreros utilizando una siembra, (hilo impregnado de algún colorante) para obtener un corte recto. En caso de así preferirlo, marque los tubos por los dos lados. Recorte los tubos de 6\" a todo lo largo para obtener dos canales. Fabrique varios soportes de canal utilizando varilla de 3/8\". Asegure firmemente el soporte inicial y final de cada cubierta teniendo en cuenta un pequeño desnivel para que el agua fluya hacia donde será recolectada. Pase un hilo indicador entre los dos soportes que le sirva de ayuda para asegurar los demás soportes y evitar desniveles en las canales. Monte las canales sin asegurarlas para poder hacer ajustes.Con ayuda de los codos y uniones de 3\", arme el sistema de recolección del agua de las canales. Este tubo debe llegar hasta el tanque de 1000 litros.Recorte el agujero de entrada y de rebose para el tubo de 3\" en el borde superior del tanque.12 Coloque el tapón de desagüe del tanque. 13Arme el sistema de rebose del tanque definiendo la disposición final del agua.14 Una vez armado el sistema y cuando se encuentre conforme, pegue todas las uniones.Figura 19. Foto de la construcción cosecha de aguas lluvia, como medida de adaptación priorizada en Cauca. Fuente: Ecohábitats /CCAFS Paso 8Lecciones aprendidas y mejora del proceso Paso 8 -Lecciones aprendidas y mejora del procesoPodemos definir a las lecciones aprendidas como el conocimiento que podemos llegar a adquirir mediante el análisis y la reflexión de un proceso o una experiencia que pueda haber tenido un resultado positivo o negativo. Para que estas lecciones puedan ser aprendidas, deben ser registradas en una base de conocimientos al alcance de todos, para que sean revisadas, consultadas y utilizadas en ocasiones futuras.Para que una lección sea aprendida, es imprescindible que se produzca la respectiva acción de cambio de actuación 21 . Solo podemos hablar de aprendizaje cuando somos capaces de tener una actuación diferente de la anterior con la finalidad de obtener un resultado distinto. Por lo que no será suficiente con realizar el análisis, la reflexión, obtener las conclusiones, redactar informes o normas para aprender. Debemos pasar a la acción y cambiar nuestra forma de actuar para que podamos afirmar que hemos aprendido de una lección. Lo anterior, se puede llevar a cabo en una sesión al final del año para considerar con los participantes de la MTA los siguientes cuestionamientos: ¿En qué manera consideran que las capacitaciones y participación en las MTA les ayudó en su trabajo?  ¿Qué partes del proceso de la MTA fueron las más útiles y por qué?  ¿De qué manera se podría mejorar el enfoque de la MTA, p. ej., para el próximo año?Sería útil anotar en un rotafolio los puntos importantes que salgan de la conversación.Para fines de monitoreo y evaluación, la MTA debe asegurarse de evaluar cómo se han promovido los objetivos relacionados con la igualdad de género y la inclusión social a lo largo del proceso. Por ejemplo, puede ser clave considerar y evaluar en qué medida la información generada por la MTA ha sido socialmente inclusivas, es decir, si es útil para la toma de decisiones sobre los medios de vida de las mujeres y los hombres, de los diferentes grupos sociales que existen en el territorio. Otro tema importante para evaluar es hasta qué punto las mujeres y los hombres agricultores, de diferentes grupos sociales, tienen mejor acceso a las alertas agroclimáticas en los territorios influenciados por los actores de la MTA. Así como, quiénes de los agricultores, hombre o mujeres que cuentan con la información climática de las MTA, aplican mejores medidas de adaptación Objetivos de este paso: Realizar encuestas de monitoreo, para evidenciar cambios en conocimiento y adopción de nuevas metodologías o herramientas, así como la difusión y alcance sistemática del boletín agroclimático.  Dar lineamientos para generar una cosecha de alcances 22 y/o evaluación de impacto, que son necesarios si la MTA lleva implementada más de tres años.No participé pero tuve acceso a la información y la compartí ","tokenCount":"14216"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0552428802.json b/data/part_2/0552428802.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8e0ae6848fd2b243cf8ac46363958cce941ef7a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0552428802.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f676ccc47443fb2842643e9bc6ec115e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/2638ba83-f752-41ce-a28e-bf4aa6390a05/retrieve","id":"-1321032345"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"8c8c12c6-7738-4bf3-a272-68e73328e846","pagecount":"20","content":"Qué se está haciendo para reducir las cifras de desnutrición… Desde su creación en el 2004, Harvestplus junto con múltiples socios a nivel mundial han logrado liberar más de 130 cultivos biofortificados en más de 40 países, mediante la estrategia de la biofortificación: cultivos mejorados de manera convencional (a través de cruces en campo), más nutritivos en vitaminas y minerales.¿Que tienen las pasturas de Urochloa que están potenciando la traslocación de Zn al grano de maíz?OBJETIVO: Evaluar el efecto residual de genotipos de Urochloa con capacidad IBN contrastante sobre el maíz biofortificado como cultivo subsecuente.HIPOTESIS: La capacidad de IBN en pasturas Urochloa suprimen la nitrificación del suelo, lo que resulta en un mejor rendimiento y contenido de Zn en el grano del maíz biofortificado. Aumento del 36% en el contenido de Zn en los tratamientos de maíz precedidos de pasturas con un promedio de 35.14 ppm versus 25.83 ppm observado en el control sin rotación con Urochloa.Los resultados de la correlación sugieren que a medida que aumenta la materia orgánica, el pH, la radiación y el riego adicional, es probable que también aumente el contenido de Zn.Sin embargo, se necesitan medir otras variables que podrían estar explicando el fenómeno observado (i.e., mayor concentración de Zn) están siendo estudiadas tales como cambios en el pH, Mo, CIC, Zn en suelo, tasas de nitrificación y textura entre los genotipos y ciclos que reportaron mayor contenido de Zn.Se necesita más investigación en el tema para entender este proceso.Los resultados obtenidos revelaron una correlación positiva entre las variables de rendimiento de grano y biomasa, lo cual concuerda con investigaciones anteriores realizadas por Karwat et al. (2017) en los Llanos Orientales de Colombia.En dichos estudios, también se observó un incremento en el rendimiento de ambas variables debido al efecto residual de la Inhibición Biológica de la nitrificación (IBN) en pasturas con U. humidicola. • Hasta el momento existe escasa investigación reportada que nos permita comparar nuestros resultados. Sin embargo, a raíz de este hallazgo surgen múltiples hipótesis que podrían explicar estos resultados:• Un suministro más abundante de nitrógeno, como resultado de la inhibición de la nitrificación, favoreció la salud de las plantas de maíz, mejorando su capacidad de absorción de Zn y, en última instancia, conduciendo a una mayor acumulación de este mineral en los granos de maíz.Posibles hipótesis• Otra explicación posible podría estar relacionada con el aumento de la materia orgánica en el suelo promovido por las pasturas. Esto podría incrementar la mineralización en las parcelas donde se encuentra el pasto, en comparación con el tratamiento de control, lo que a su vez resultaría en una mayor solubilización de Zn.• Variables ambientales, contenido de materia orgánica, pH, CIC, contenido de Zn en suelo, en los genotipos que reportaron mayor acumulación del mineral, podrían estar explicando el fenómeno observado.• La absorción y acumulación de Zn en las plantas es un proceso complejo en el que influyen múl tiples factores que interactúan entre sí. Las condiciones específicas y las interacciones entre est os factores pueden variar en función de la especie vegetal y del entorno en el que se cultivan.• Se requiere de más investigación para profundizar en estas hipótesis y comprender mejor los mecanismos subyacentes a este fenómeno.• Jairo Arcos Jaramillo • Daniel Mauricio Villegas • Miguel Angel Acosta Chinchilla • Programa Biofortificados -Laboratorio de Calidad Nutricional • Alejandro Ruden por ser el portavoz de este trabajo.Madyan Vanessa Prado-Murcia m.prado@cgiar.org","tokenCount":"565"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0558271205.json b/data/part_2/0558271205.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d419e13c99664dcfda4755fc7a55ad26908b24a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0558271205.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"acb51629bba7c0e51526286da8543f54","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/f1721bf3-ed99-48e9-a7b4-023167dc6d8b/retrieve","id":"-1580104846"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"ccf6cb0b-acff-4c8a-addd-96defc5a7918","pagecount":"10","content":"Cassava is the second most important staple food crop for Uganda and is prone to contamination with mycotoxins. This study aimed at understanding the current agricultural practices, their potential influence on mycotoxin occurrence, as well as assessing mycotoxin knowledge among key cassava value chain actors, including farmers, wholesalers, and processors. Data were collected through individual interviews (210), key informant interviews (34), and 4 focus group discussions. The findings revealed that 51% of farmers peeled cassava directly on bare ground, resulting in direct contact with soil that potentially harbors mycotoxin-producing fungi, such as Aspergillus section Flavi. During postharvest handling, 51.6% of farmers dried cassava chips directly on bare ground. Nearly, all (95.2%) of wholesalers packed cassava chips in local gunny bags and placed them on ground instead of pallets. In the processing of cassava chips into flour, only one of the 14 processing machines was certified by the Uganda National Bureau of Standards. Additionally, there was only one processing machine available for every 180 (1:180) consumers bringing their cassava for processing. 50.8% of cassava consumers interviewed admitted to consuming cassava flour regardless of quality, while 73% blended cassava flour with flour from mycotoxin-susceptible crops mainly maize, millet, and sorghum. Most (96.2%) of the people along the cassava value chain did not understand what the term mycotoxins meant. However, 56% of interviewed respondents were familiar with the term aflatoxins. Of the cassava value chain actors aware of mycotoxins, 82.9% knew of methods for reducing aflatoxin contamination, but only 40.9% were putting such methods into practice. More farmers (47.9%) managed aflatoxins compared to wholesalers (33.3%) and processors (21.4%). Knowledge on aflatoxins was significantly associated with value chain actor (P = 0.026), head of household (P = 0.004), region (P = 0.033), age (P = 0.001), and experience (P = 0.001). This study highlights the critical areas of mycotoxin contamination within the cassava value chain in Uganda and underscores the need to improve the knowledge among value chain actors especially farmers.Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is a major staple crop in Uganda that is consumed by more than 50% of the population (UBOS, 2019). Due to its cheap source of carbohydrates, resistance to drought, and capacity to produce significant yields even on marginal land where other crops fail, cassava production has spread and is now the second most important crop after bananas (Scott et al., 2021). Production and consumption of cassava is more concentrated in the eastern region (37%), followed by the northern region (34%), the western region (15%), and the central region (14%) (Buyinza & Kitinoja, 2018). Currently, 2.67 million MT of cassava are produced on 878,297 ha outpacing all other root crops in Uganda (FAOSTAT, 2022).Historically, 88% of the cassava produced was consumed locally, and the crop was considered a food security crop for resource-poor farmers (Buyinza & Kitinoja, 2018). However, in 2016, the pharmaceutical, baking, and alcohol sectors transformed cassava into a wonder crop due to its novel attributes. For instance, it has been discovered that cassava is gluten-free and can replace wheat in bread (Garske et al., 2023;Oyeyinka et al., 2022;Rachman et al., 2023). Furthermore, the Nile Breweries Ltd, the largest brewer in Uganda, is utilizing cassava to produce beer that contains 60-68% cassava flour and the pharmaceutical industry is also drawn to the starch content in cassava (Graffham Andrew, 2017). For these reasons, the Ugandangovernment has identified cassava as one of the ten crops that will enable the country to change its status from a subsistence to a middle-income by 2040 (National Planning Authority, 2020).Despite this, the production and marketing of cassava in Uganda face numerous challenges, including low productivity, postharvest losses, and contamination with mycotoxins (Atukwase et al., 2009). Mycotoxins are toxic secondary metabolites produced by fungi, which can grow on crops during preharvest, harvest, and postharvest stages (Bennett & Inamdar, 2015). The presence of mycotoxins in food and feed poses significant risks to human and animal health, including cancer, liver damage, immune suppression, and developmental problems (Zain, 2011;IARC, 2002). In Uganda, mycotoxin contamination in food crops is a significant public health concern (Oyesigye et al., 2024), with aflatoxins being the most prevalent and potent mycotoxins. In particular, aflatoxin B 1 (AFB 1 ) is the most potent naturally formed carcinogen (IARC, 2002).The significance of mycotoxin contamination in cassava cannot be underestimated, especially considering that cassava is the second most widely consumed food crop in Uganda. Several studies have reported high levels of mycotoxin contamination in cassava-based products in Uganda. For example Kaaya and Warren (2005) reported that more than 60% of analyzed cassava flour samples had high levels of aflatoxins exceeding the World Health Organization (WHO) maximum permissible limit of 20 μg/kg. Kitya et al (2010) also found high levels of aflatoxins with an average of 16 μg/kg in Uganda's cassava flour, indicating the need for better postharvest handling practices to reduce contamination. Kaaya and Eboku (2010) reported aflatoxin levels in cassava flour ranging between 0.51 to 0.45 μg/kg. Another study conducted in Uganda by Serck-Hanssen (2013) reported acute poisoning and death of a 15-year-old child who consumed cassava that was contaminated with aflatoxin B 1 (AFB 1 ). The situation is worse given the increasing death cases reported at the national regional referral hospitals (Mulago) attributed to hepatocellular carcinoma-a cancer type highly linked to aflatoxins (Bukirwa et al., 2021). Addressing mycotoxin contamination in cassava is crucial for improving public health and enhancing economic growth. Recent studies have demonstrated that efforts to mitigate mycotoxin contamination are more effective when informed by a comprehensive understanding of the entire crop value chain (Cervini et al., 2022a;Massomo, 2020;Namubiru et al., 2022). By critically assessing activities along the value chain and examining the knowledge and practices of value chain actors, interventions can be better targeted towards addressing the specific factors contributing to mycotoxin contamination. However, there is a paucity of knowledge on cassava handling practices along the value chain (farmers, wholesalers, processors, and final consumers), and how these practices are likely to lead to mycotoxin contamination at each stage of the value chain. Furthermore, it is not clear the extent to which value chain actors know about mycotoxins. This study aimed to (1) understand the current methods used to handle cassava along the value chain and identify key practices that may potentially contribute to mycotoxin contamination, and (2) assess knowledge of mycotoxins within key cassava value chain actors.An explanatory mixed methods design approach was used. Individual interviews, on-site observations, focus group discussions (FDGs), and key informant interviews (KIIs) were used to collect data about cassava production and postharvest handling practices, and mycotoxin knowledge.Data were collected from a purposive sample of cassava farmers, wholesalers, and processors. Sample size was determined using Raosoft online sample calculator (https://www.raosoft.com/samplesize. html). District Production and Marketing Officer (DPMO) data indicated that each district had an average of 35,000 cassava farmers and 506 wholesalers; thus, the sample was drawn from this. The inclusion criteria for farmers, wholesalers, and processors were as follows: Farmers were required to possess a cassava garden and store cassava chips and flour for a minimum of 30 days. Wholesalers needed to have been in business for at least 2 years and to have stocked cassava chips and flour for at least 30 days. Upon applying these criteria, the total number of farmers and wholesalers in the sample was reduced to 205 and 110, respectively. Utilizing the Raosoft sample calculator with this adjusted population, a minimum sample size of 124 farmers and 75 cassava wholesalers was determined for the study. Given the limited number of processors in the cassava value chain (Kleih et al., 2012), a sample size of 15-20 respondents was deemed adequate (Namey et al., 2016) and thus was targeted.According to Graves (2002), Namey et al. (2016), Vasudevan et al. (2020) 4-5 FGDs consisting of at least 15 people, and 15-34 KIIs are deemed enough to provide sufficiently reliable data, thus were targeted. For FGDs, the selection of participants, moderators, and preparing open-ended question was conducted as recommended by Nyumba et al. (2018). Of the four FGDs, two were from farmer groups and two from wholesalers (those owning stores). Despite targeting a FGD from processors, the attempt was unsuccessful since there were relatively few of them in the area, and they were also busy with clients. The FGD was conducted by a moderator and a note-taker, both native language speakers. Each FGD lasted an average of two hours, with the moderator probing participants when it was required to elicit more details. The questionnaire used was divided into 2 main sections firstly, to understand the processes that cassava goes through from the field to harvest, drying, storage, and consumption at the farmer level, and secondly to investigate procedures that wholesalers follow, after receiving cassava from farmers, including how it is stored, dried, processed, and sold.For individual interviews and on-site observations, a total sample of 210 face-to-face in-depth interviews were conducted that included cassava farmers (121), cassava wholesalers (75), and processors (14) (Table S1). Enumerators were selected from the study communities based on their ability to communicate effectively and conduct semistructured interviews in local languages. They underwent a four-day training session, which included the pretesting of the questionnaire. The final pretested and validated questionnaire was uploaded on an open-source KoboCollect app version 2024.1.3. The interview procedure began with a comprehensive explanation of the study's objectives and obtaining consent from the participants. Following preguided questions, the respondents were then interviewed for a duration of 20-30 min. On-site observations were made at each value chain stage following a mini-predetermined checklist (Table S2) about the state in which cassava is dried, stored, and processed. The team leader recorded these observations upon anonymous agreement with the data collection team.For key informant interviews, a total of 32 Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) were carried out to systematically gather information on the handling, consumption, existing policies, and awareness of aflatoxin in cassava value chain. The key informants were dominated by Agriculture Extension Officers (15), the Head of the cassava traders Organization (8), the District Production and Marketing Officer (4), and the District Agricultural Officer (5) (Table S1). The interview guide consisted of 2 major sections. The first section involved questions relating to cassava quality requirements, handling practices at farm, wholesaler, and processing level. The second section involved questions related to knowledge of aflatoxins, perception of communities towards aflatoxin, policies, and existing mitigation strategies being implemented. The same interview process as earlier explained was followed to conduct KIIs.A precalibrated digital dry moisture meter (safeguard Europe Ltd) was used to measure the ambient moisture content (% MC) for respective storage sites. Three different readings were recorded from three different positions (at the two corners and center) of the store.Quantitative data were exported to Microsoft Excel for data cleaning. The latter consisted of omitting questionnaires with responses less than 60%. After cleaning, quantitative data were analyzed with Stata version 17 (Stata 2017). Prior to analysis, the data were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk and heteroskedasticity using the Breusch-Pagan tests. The analysis was parametric because the data passed these two tests without the requirement for transformation. Descriptive statistics mainly frequency tables and graphs were used to summarize data. To determine the factors that may contribute to knowledge about mycotoxins, simple binary dichotomy statements were used with one point (1) accorded to any right statement while no point (0) was awarded for a wrong response (1 = true, 0 = false). A Chi-square (X 2 ) test at a 95% confidence level was run to test associations between the categorical variables against the value chain actors (farmer, wholesaler, and processor). The relationship between knowledge on mycotoxins and demographic variables was determined with the bivariate logistic regression at a 95% confidence level. All other variables for instance gender, region, and head of household were converted into dummy variables with binary responses. To avoid perfect multicollinearity, dummy variables with more than one category, for instance, education level were converted to two categories to fit within the assumptions of the model (1).whereby Y = Knowledge about aflatoxins, X 1 = head of household, X 2 -= education level, X 3 = gender, X 4 = age, X 5 = region, X 6 = experience and e i = error terms. Qualitative data from FGDs were analyzed following the thematic content analysis as recommended by Nyumba et al. (2018). Data were coded into themes, and individual responses to a question were first evaluated for the level of anonymous consensus among participants. The findings were then triangulated into the face-to-face in-depth interviews to provide a more detailed understanding of the subject studied. Data from KIIs that contained 28, predetermined statements were weighed against a Likert scale of 1-5. If a respondent selected 5 for each of the 28 statements, the maximum weight would be 140 (28 × 5), while selecting 1 for each of the 28 statements would result in the minimum weight of 28 (28 × 1). To check factor dimensionality, the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed on the 5 constructs Likert scale. The scores were measured by Cronbach alpha (Cronbach, 1951) to check if the Likert statements were internally consistent (if Cronbach value, Ca > 0.7). A screen test with varimax rotation was used to obtain results that can easily be interpreted with statements of factor loading >0.4 retained for further analysis.This study aimed to (1) understand the current methods used to handle cassava along the value chain and identify key practices that may potentially contribute to mycotoxin contamination, and (2) assess knowledge of mycotoxins within key cassava value chain actors. Results are presented as follows:The current cassava handling practices and identify key practices that may potentially contribute to mycotoxin contamination To understand the handling practices, the study first examined the duration cassava chips and flour remain at each stage of the value chain. A systematic review and analysis of results from FGDs and indepth interviews resulted in the flow of dry cassava from the farmer to consumers (Fig. 1). The first step to produce cassava chips is to slice and dry fresh cassava. Three primary routes are used to move cassava chips from the farm. In the first route, farmers take cassava chips to the nearby wholesaler who stores the chips for 30-90 days. More than 72% of farmers use this route. The second route, which is used by 22% of farmers relies on village assemblers to collect the chips from farmers door to door and sell them to the wholesaler, and this is usually accomplished between 3 and 7 days. In the third route, 6% of the farmers directly sell to farmer groups contracted by industries to supply high−quality cassava chips as raw material for the industry sector. The producer organizations also sell the chips to wholesalers especially in the season when the supply supersedes their demand.Between 5 and 90 days of acquiring the cassava chips, the wholesaler sells to retailers, and industries. Depending on the need, the wholesalers process the cassava chips into flour and sell the flour. The major value chain actors that significantly transform cassava chips into flour are the retailers that do this piecemeal; they store chips for a duration of 1-40 days and continue to transform them into flour, depending on the demand from the final consumer. The cassava flour obtained from the processor can be utilized for home consumption by making a cassava meal, animal feeds, small-scale brewing, and in the manufacturing of confectionery, starch, and ethanol. It should be noted that cassava stays the longest period during bulking and storage with the wholesaler and retailers holding it up to 90 days.Majority of (75.6%) cassava farmers greatly rely on traditional indicators to decide whether cassava is ready for harvest. Only 24.6% of the farmers check their planting records to find out the maturity period; the majority (76.4%) perceive that once the soil around the cassava plant crack, the root will have reached the required size to be harvested (FGD-ST02). Since the months of November through February are sunny, most farmers (61.6%) take advantage of this time to maximize natural sunlight for drying their cassava. The harvesting process is carried out by both men and women (68.3%), primarily by digging out the cassava tubers using a hand hoe which cuts, injures, and bruises the cassava tubers allowing soil to intermingle with tubers which predisposes it to mycotoxigenic fungi. In the FGD ST02, farmer admitted that, unless it is to be used for roasting, in which case the customer needs a full root that is not damaged, 82.5% of the cassava harvested is sliced, injured, and encounters soil during harvest. \"We don't have time to worry about whether the tuber is cut or mixed with soil. What we typically care about is to remove as much as we can from the soil, whether they are cut or not. Cutting the tuber while it is still in the field even reduces labour costs for slicing it into manageable sizes during peeling, which ultimately speeds up and simplifies the peeling process, after all, we wash off any soil after peeling\". (FGD-KML1).Peeling and drying cassava. Cassava is normally peeled on bare ground (51.6%). The peeling activity is dominated by women (85.1%) (Fig. 2; 01). Peeling is followed by drying which is majorly on tarpaulin and bareground (Fig. 2; 02). Although it is majorly dried in these two ways, the preferences differ by region. Whereas the Eastern region dries most of their cassava on bare ground (42.2%), the Northern region does so on tarpaulin (48.1%) (Fig. 3). To prevent direct contact of cassava with soil, 16% of farmers first smear the surface with cow dung and when the surface is dry enough, they dry their cassava on this surface 'cow dung smeared surface'. The other drying surfaces were rocks and paved roads (3.9%), and gunny plastic bags (1.95%) (Fig. 3). The drying process takes an average of 6 days, after these days, farmers rely on traditional indicators to decide if the cassava chips are dry enough to be stored or processed. Most of the farmers (88.9%) break to check the brittleness of cassava. It is assumed that when the cassava chips can easily break without brittleness, then it is ready enough for processing or storage (Table S3).Moisture content in stores varied from 12.6% to 26% with an average of 15.6%. Cassava is stored either as chips or flour. The wholesaler prefers storing cassava in the form of chips so that retailers can buy it at any time and convert it into flour for selling to the final consumer. Farmers primarily store cassava for a long period (up to 1 year) as flour. The farmer stores cassava chips for 10-30 days. In this period, the farmer slowly sells the chips to get money for household use, while the rest of the chips are converted into flour for home consumption. When cassava chips/flour are ready for storage, both farmers (46.7%) and wholesaler (95.2%) dominantly use the plastic singlelayered gunny bags for packaging and storage (Fig. 2; 06) (Table S4). The nature of storage is dependent on the value chain actor (Fig. 2; 04-05). Only 5.83% of the farmers owned stores which are built separate from the living room mainly intended for crop storage. The majority (86.7%) of farmers store cassava chips and flour in kitchen and bedrooms because they believe the smoke from kitchen preserves cassava, while storing in bedrooms protects the chips from thieves (Fig. 2; 07). Only 5% store cassava chips and flour in metallic barrels (Table S4).Conversely, almost all the wholesalers (89.2%) store cassava chips in facilities which are normally rented in trading centers. These facilities are referred to as 'stores'. Within the storage facility, the chips are packed tightly in single−layered local gunny bags and placed on the ground (Fig. 2; 06). Only 22.4% of wholesalers place the cassava chips on pallets or raised surfaces. Before buying, wholesalers base on white color and brittleness as indicators for high-quality cassava chips. The responsibility of protecting the storage is sorely left to the farmers because when the chips are of poor quality, wholesalers will reject it. In this regard, whereas most farmers (72.9%) are more concerned with protecting their storage by continuously redrying, turning the chips, and regularly opening windows, only 30.1% of the wholesalers do so (Table S4). Cassava chips are mainly converted into flour which is either used for preparing a cassava meal, manufacturing industries, local brew, and pancakes. In this study, the ratio of processing machines to consumers taking their chips for processing was found to be 1:180 and each machine processes an average amount of 26.43 kg of cassava chips daily (Table S5). Because electricity is not available in most parts of the study sites, the frequently (75%) used processing machines are diesel-powered milling machine (Fig. 2; 09). Despite the call by the Uganda National Bureau of Standards (UNBS) to register the milling machines so that they can be inspected and ensure they meet quality standards, only 1/14 machines (table S5) were certified and registered with UNBS. The same machines that process cassava are used to process other high mycotoxin contamination-prone crops particularly, maize, sorghum, and millet. When asked whether these machines are cleaned from one crop to another or from one lot to another, all machine operators admitted that they never do so. Cassava can be consumed either fresh or dried. The consumption characteristics are summarized in Table S5. A significant number of respondents (75%) expressed a preference for consuming cassava in its dry form, specifically as flour. The cassava meal, particularly when blended with flour derived from other crops, is considered a culinary delight by the majority (72.8%). The consumers who blend cassava do so because they believe that blending improves the taste and reduces the starch content thereby making the meal more viscous, and others do it because it is the traditional norm. In FGD K-04, one respondent stated, 'Mixing cassava flour with sorghum is the best for me. My husband loves it so much, if I don't mix it, he will not eat the meal and eventually becomes less productive. Because of this, my children have also started rejecting eating a meal prepared from cassava flour without any mixing. However, blending is sometimes expensive because if you don't have your own sorghum or maize, then you have to buy it and, in some periods, I don't have money'. A few consumers (27.2%) who do not currently blend cassava with other crops expressed a desire to do so but the deterrent was the high cost of flour from other crops. This indicates that the preference for blending is nearly unanimous among consumers, with the limitation being primarily due to economic factors rather than personal choice. The highly preferred crops for blending included sorghum (54.9%), millet (36.6%), maize (7.19%), and sweet potatoes (Table S5).Managing mycotoxins requires the value chain actors to have a basic understanding of mycotoxins, their causes, and mitigation strategies. The study assessed the knowledge of mycotoxins, particularly aflatoxins along the cassava value chain, demographic factors that may be linked to this knowledge, and what key informants perceive to be the knowledge capacity along the cassava value chain.The results in Table 1 indicate that the level of knowledge about mycotoxins varied significantly along the cassava value chain. The word mycotoxin seemed new to value chain actors. Only 3.82% had ever heard of the word mycotoxins. Of these, one was a farmer, seven were wholesalers and no processor had ever heard of mycotoxins. Conversely, aflatoxins were a more familiar terminology as a majority (55.7%) of value chain actors had ever heard of them. In terms of knowledge distribution, farmers had significantly low (48.8%) knowledge of aflatoxins compared to wholesalers (68%) and processors (50%) (Table 1). Additionally, the findings revealed that farmers (56.2) were more knowledgeable about the crops prone to aflatoxins contamination than either wholesaler (53.3%) or processor (21.4%). Similarly, a higher proportion of wholesaler (40%) than farmers (11.6%) or processors (14.3%) were aware of the consequences of consuming mycotoxin-contaminated food implying that wholesalers may be more aware of the dangers posed by aflatoxins.The study also found that while more cassava value chain actors (82.9%) were aware of the methods for reducing mycotoxin build-up especially drying on tarpaulin and storing on pallets, only 40.9% were putting such methods into practice. Farmers were putting significantly more effort (47.9%) to manage aflatoxins than either wholesalers (33.3%) or processors (21.4%). This suggests that, even though people may be aware of the techniques to reduce mycotoxin contamination, there may be barriers to putting these practices into practice.The analysis of results in Table 2 reveals that cassava farmers have significantly less negative knowledge of mycotoxins (P = 0.026), compared to wholesalers and processors. Equally, female-headed households were not aware of mycotoxins (P = 0.004), with femaleheaded households having relatively less knowledge about aflatoxins than male-headed households. Similarly, there were significant differences (P = 0.033) in aflatoxin knowledge between regions, with farmers from the northern region more aware of aflatoxins than the eastern region. Age emerged as a crucial factor influencing aflatoxin knowledge. The analysis indicates a significant negative association between age and knowledge (P = 0.001) suggesting that older actors along the cassava value chain have lower knowledge about aflatoxins. Experience was significantly associated with knowledge (P = 0.001), the more experienced value chain actors had higher levels of knowledge of aflatoxins (P = 0.001). It is important to note that education level and gender did not show significant associations with aflatoxin knowledge.The results presented in Table 3 provide information on the perception of key informant interviews on the knowledge spread and practices of farmers, wholesalers, and processors regarding mycotoxins in a community. The factor loadings reveal the strength and direction of each item's association with the three respondent categories (farmers, store clerks, and processors).The findings show a strong correlation between key informants' perceptions and the community's awareness of aflatoxins. As indicated in the loading factors of 0.63-0.67 for \"The community is aware of mycotoxins\" and 0.648 for \"There are currently in place guidelines on mycotoxins\", key informants acknowledge community's awareness of aflatoxins and the availability of recommendations to manage afla- toxins. However, it was worrying that some value chain actors, especially farmers did not understand the negative effects of mycotoxins. This is seen by the loading factors of 0.77 for \"The community does not know the consequences of mycotoxins\" and 0.86 for \"The community does not know the consequences of mycotoxins.\" These results show that the key informants believe there is a knowledge gap in the community regarding the potential risks associated with mycotoxins. It was also revealed by key informants that the community is frequently consuming aflatoxin-contaminated foods as shown by a high loading factor of 0.74. Consequently, key informants strongly agreed (factor loading 0.63) that cassava meal is normally prepared with other aflatoxin-prone foods mainly millet and maize.In terms of recommended practices, the key informants perceive that value chain actors have received training on the management of aflatoxins (0.6-0.83), but there is a general lack of implementation especially in drying and storage. This is evident from the loading factors of 0.46 for \"Recommended practices are not often implemented. Similarly, processors were pinpointed as strong contributors to aflatoxin contamination as depicted in the factor loading of 0.759 for \"Processors are not certified; machines don't meet standards.\" These findings suggest that the key informants believe that the recommended practices for handling aflatoxins are not consistently followed, and there may be issues related to certification and adherence to standards among processors. Overall, the results indicate a mixed perception among the key informants regarding aflatoxins in the community. While there is a general awareness of aflatoxins and existing guidelines, there is also a need to improve understanding of the consequences and ensure better implementation of recommended practices.The current cassava handling practices and identify key practices that may potentially contribute to mycotoxin contamination This study compared practices along the cassava value chain with existing literature to determine the critical areas potentially contributing to mycotoxin contamination. This discussion is based on key findings from the following stages: preharvest activities (harvesting and peeling), postharvest (drying, storage, and processing), and consumption. At preharvest stage, the study identified two critical areas that are likely to increase the risk of mycotoxin contamination: intercropping and contact of freshly harvested tubers with soil. Results revealed that freshly harvested tubers can get in contact with soil through damage of tubers during harvesting and placing peeled cassava directly on bare ground. In both scenarios, farmers wash off the soil to make the peeled tuber clean. However, rinsing the tubers with water may not effectively detach mycotoxigenic species and will provide a humid environment for fungal growth (Donner et al., 2009;Nyangweso Salano et al., 2016), thus increasing the risk of mycotoxin contamination. The cell wall of Aspergillus section Flavi species are composed primarily of glucan and chitin, which provides them with a strong attachment ability to various materials, including cassava tubers (Ruiz-Herrera, 1967). Therefore, contact between freshly harvested cassava and soil represents a significant predisposing factor for mycotoxigenic-producing fungi that lives in soil to get in contact with fresh cassava, hence encouraging contamination. Moreover, it is crucial to characterize the specific species of Aspergillus section Flavi present in the soils within cassava fields. This characterization will enable a comprehensive assessment of their toxigenic potential in different geographical contexts, thereby identifying areas with a higher risk of mycotoxin contamination. Understanding the geographical distribution of these species and their toxigenicity levels is essential for implementing informed management practices to effectively mitigate the risk.The cassava postharvest stage encompasses drying, storage, and processing. Three critical areas that potentially expose cassava to mycotoxin contamination were identified. First, farmers dried cassava chips directly on the ground that was prevalent in the eastern region. This practice is sometimes intentionally done because cassava dried on the ground appears to weigh more, leading to higher monetary value (Kaaya & Warren, 2005). However, drying cassava chips on bare ground has been found to significantly contribute to mycotoxin contamination, primarily aflatoxins and fumonisins (Atukwase et al., 2009;Kitya et al., 2010) and should be avoided. The widespread practice of drying cassava on bare ground and rocky surfaces in the eastern region is a prominent factor that is likely to increase mycotoxin contamination and requires urgent intervention. Secondly, farmers admitted that animals, particularly chickens, goats, and pigs, trample over the drying cassava, resulting in fecal contamination of the chips. Fecal matter from such animals is highly contaminated with mycotoxins (Dersjant-Li et al., 2003;Nishimwe et al., 2019;Schrenk et al., 2022). This represents another pathway that can lead to the accumulation of mycotoxins in cassava. Majority of respondents reported drying cassava during the peak months of sunshine, from November to February, and relied on subjective methods like brittleness to determine if the cassava chips were sufficiently dry. There is a need for innovative and economically feasible alternative drying methods, such as solar dryers (Cervini et al., 2022a), that can be used year-round especially in rainy seasons when the prices for cassava chips are high. These dryers would not only prevent animals from trampling over the drying cassava but also reduce the labor involved in removing the chips from drying surfaces when it rains.Thirdly, wholesalers pack cassava chips in high moisture-absorbing gunny bags and place them on the ground for storage. Poor storage conditions, particularly in unhygienic, and poorly ventilated environments have been reported to increase mycotoxin levels (Swai et al., 2019;Uwishema et al., 2022). Although double-layered polythene bags, such as hermetically sealed bags are highly recommended for storage, only 1% of wholesalers are utilizing these bags, hermetic bags may protect the products but may not necessarily reduce mycotoxin contamination of the cassava chips. It is crucial to explore affordable packaging solutions that can effectively reduce the levels of mycotoxin, like recent advancements in sodium metabisulphite sheets for reducing aflatoxin B 1 in chili powder (Al-Jaza et al., 2022) and in peanuts (Cervini et al., 2022b). Additionally, the responsibility of protecting the storage has been mainly left to the farmers, with only a few wholesalers (30.1%) concerned about checking storage quality. Wholesalers play a crucial role in mycotoxin contamination as they dictate prices and buy cassava chips based on their preferences (Essuman et al., 2022). This situation allows them to pay less attention to the quality of stored cassava. Therefore, the implementation of innovative packaging materials, such as sodium metabisulphite sheets and other alternatives, which can reduce mycotoxin levels in chips already contaminated, becomes crucial in addressing the negligence displayed by these actors.Furthermore, it was found that only one processing machine was certified and registered with the national standards regulatory body (UNBS), and these machines were never cleaned between consecutive lots. The same machines are used to process other crops including maize, millet, and sorghum, which are highly prone to mycotoxin contamination. This factor can contribute to the problem, as the levels of mycotoxin in the crops brought for processing may vary among different owners. Consequently, even if one strives to produce uncontaminated cassava chips, there is a likelihood of contamination during the processing stage when utilizing these machines. The impact of processing machines on mycotoxin levels has been investigated on peanut butter in Kenya (Ndung'u et al., 2013), and adherence to registration requirements set by the national standard bureau was identified as a crucial intervention to mitigate contamination levels, the same is recommended in Uganda.At the consumer level, it was evident that individuals are reluctant to discard flour that appears to be contaminated with some opting to mix the new batch of flour with the visibly contaminated portion to reduce the overall level of contamination. To make matters worse, the majority prepare cassava meal by blending it with flour from highly mycotoxin susceptible crops (maize, millet, and sorghum). Mixing cassava flour with other known mycotoxin−prone crops like millet and sorghum (Kitya et al., 2010;Lukwago et al., 2019;Murokore et al., 2023) may increase the risk of mycotoxin contamination among consumers.The study also examined mycotoxin (particularly aflatoxins) knowledge among various actors along the cassava value chain. Aflatoxins were the most recognized mycotoxins, with the majority being aware of them. However, the term \"mycotoxins\" itself was not familiar to many respondents, indicating a lack of awareness about the broader category. The limited knowledge of aflatoxins within farmers has been documented along the value chain (Massomo, 2020;Nakavuma et al., 2020;Namubiru et al., 2022), yet they are at the beginning part of the entire value chain. More efforts should be directed to educate farmers about mycotoxins. The study also found that while some cassava value chain actors (especially wholesalers) were aware of the methods for reducing aflatoxin contamination, the actual implementation of these methods was relatively low. This suggests that although people may be aware of the techniques to reduce aflatoxin contamination, there may be barriers to putting these practices into action.The analysis of social-demographic factors influencing knowledge on mycotoxins along the value chain in Table 2 revealed several interesting findings. The role of being the head of the household exhibited a significant negative correlation with aflatoxin knowledge, with female-headed households having relatively less knowledge about aflatoxins than male-headed households. Region and age were also identified as crucial factors influencing mycotoxin knowledge, with the northern region and younger actors demonstrating higher levels of knowledge. Women are responsible for family nutrition and are better placed to manage mycotoxins than men (Kang'ethe & Lang, 2009), thus should be targeted for trainings on aflatoxins. Additionally, the experience was significantly associated with knowledge, indicating that more experienced value chain actors had higher levels of knowledge on aflatoxins. Contrary to other researchers (Magembe et al., 2016;Namubiru et al., 2022), our study showed that level of education and gender did not influence knowledge of mycotoxins. Findings in this study highlight the need to pay keen attention to household heads, age, and region while designing or revising existing aflatoxin management strategies.Perceptions of KIIs regarding knowledge spread and practices of farmers, wholesalers, and processors regarding aflatoxins were also assessed (Table 3). The results showed a strong correlation between KIIs' perceptions and the community's awareness of mycotoxins. However, there was a concerning knowledge gap among farmers regarding the negative effects of aflatoxins. The KIIs also highlighted the high consumption of mycotoxin-contaminated foods in the community. In terms of recommended practices, they perceived a lack of consistent implementation, particularly in drying and storage, and identified processors as contributors to aflatoxin contamination. KIIs provide an overview on the level of implementation and are at the forefront for most trainings and enforcing policies in relation to mycotoxin contam-ination highlighting the need for their involvement during designing or revising existing aflatoxin management strategies.Limitations of the study: This study faced several limitations. Firstly, the number of processors in the cassava value chain was relatively small, which constrained the sample size for this group to 14 participants. This small sample size may limit the depth of insights gained from processors. Additionally, wholesalers were often unable to allocate sufficient time for more in-depth questioning due to their busy schedules, which might have restricted the comprehensiveness of their responses. While the study aimed to conduct multiple focus group discussions (FGDs), logistical challenges prevented the inclusion of additional FGDs. This limitation potentially affected the breadth of qualitative data collected. Despite these challenges, the study made considerable efforts to capture a broad range of perspectives through the available individual interviews, FGDs, and key informant interviews.This study delved into two main objectives: the current cassava handling practices along the value chain, and their potential to increase mycotoxin contamination as well as the level of knowledge regarding mycotoxins among key actors within the cassava value chain in Uganda. Critical areas were identified as potential contributors to mycotoxin contamination, including contact between freshly harvested tubers and soil, poor postharvest practices such as direct ground drying and inadequate storage conditions, as well as improper processing. Interventions such as innovative drying methods, improved storage facilities, monitoring and regulating milling machines used in the processing of cassava chips into flour, and alternative packaging materials were recommended to mitigate these risks. While awareness of aflatoxins was relatively high among value chain actors, there was limited understanding of mycotoxins as a broader category. This highlights the need for targeted educational efforts to improve awareness and implementation of practices to reduce mycotoxin contamination. Furthermore, the findings indicate that while most value chain actors are aware of recommended practices for managing aflatoxins, they are not implementing them. This suggests a need for either a revision of existing practices or stronger enforcement measures. Factors such as household headship, age, region, and experience were found to influence mycotoxin knowledge, suggesting the need for tailored educational interventions. Addressing these identified gaps in cassava handling practices and mycotoxin knowledge among value chain actors is crucial for improving food safety and public health in Uganda. Collaborative efforts involving policymakers, researchers, extension officers, and community members are essential to implement effective interventions and ensure the adoption of best practices along the cassava value chain. ","tokenCount":"6482"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0579709183.json b/data/part_2/0579709183.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e104ab5ff17ee4781924ac5f0ee4915e27474396 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0579709183.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e0103641061ef2934601d55bcd9b48bd","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/a8f74615-71c1-4fc0-ab0d-f24d2766a72e/content","id":"172792379"},"keywords":["Migration","Climate-smart agriculture","Food and nutrition security","Knowledge index"],"sieverID":"c4a3eda5-da48-4446-8f99-43b8795c6ccc","pagecount":"19","content":"Purpose -Increasing trends of climatic risk pose challenges to the food security and livelihoods of smallholders in vulnerable regions, where farmers often face loss of the entire crop, pushing farmers (mostly men) out of agriculture in destitution, creating a situation of agricultural making agriculture highly feminization and compelling male farmers to out-migrate. Climate-smart agricultural practices (CSAPs) are promoted to cope with climatic risks. This study aims to assess how knowledge related to CSAPs, male outmigration, education and income contribute to the determinants of male out-migration and CSAPs adoption and how they respond to household food security.Design/methodology/approach -Sex-disaggregated primary data were collected from adopter and non-adopter farm families. STATA 13.1 was used to perform principle component analysis to construct knowledge, yield and income indices.Findings -Yield and income index of adopters was higher for men than women. The probability of outmigration reduced by 21% with adoption of CSAPs. An increase in female literacy by 1 unit reduces log of odds to migrate by 0.37. With every unit increase in knowledge index, increase in log-odds of CSAPs adoption was 1.57. Male:female knowledge gap was less among adopters. Non-adopters tended to reduce food consumption when faced with climatic risks significantly, and the probability of migration increased by 50% with a one-unit fall in the nutrition level, thus compelling women to work more in agriculture. Genderequitable enhancement of CSAP knowledge is, therefore, key to safeguarding sustainable farming systems and improving livelihoods.Social implications -The enhancement of gender equitable knowledge on CSAPs is key to safeguard sustainable farming systems and improved livelihoods.Climatic risk because of extreme weather events variability is one of the most critical factors affecting agricultural production. Indian agriculture is largely weatherdependent; over 60% of crops are rainfed, making them highly vulnerable to climateinduced changes in precipitation patterns. Weather-related risks in India such as heat waves, cold snaps, droughts and floods have become the norm because of their increasing occurrence during the recent past. This is evident from the extreme weather data; the number of extreme temperatures (minimum and maximum) and rainfall events have increased significantly from 30 in 1930 to about 358 in 2010 (Mahdi et al., 2015). It is estimated that by the 2050s, with a temperature increase of 2-2.5°C compared to pre-industrial levels, water for agricultural production will reduce further, and this may impact food adequacy for some 63 million people (The World Bank, 2013).In India, the state of Bihar is highly vulnerable to hydro-meteorological natural disasters, with North Bihar, in general, being flood-prone and South Bihar being drought-prone. In the (relative) absence of state-level climate models and or vulnerability studies, and with low community awareness, the state is potentially more sensitive to climate change (Bihar state action plan on climate change, 2015). A unique paradox is witnessed in Bihar wherein flood and drought events occur in the same year and sometimes in the same district. Out of 38 districts, 28 are flood-prone, with major flood events occurring in 2004,2007,2011,2013 and breach-induced flooding in 2008. Both North and South Bihar have experienced drought, as evidenced by drought being declared in 26 districts in 2009, all 38 districts in 2010 and 33 districts in 2013. Further, the years 2012, 2014 and 2015 were no better than the drought years because Bihar experienced irregular and erratic rainfall. In March 2015, there was extensive crop damage because of unseasonal rainfall and hailstorms (Roadmap for Disaster Reduction, 2016).Because of these unpredicted and extreme climatic stresses, farmers often face the loss of their crops, livelihoods and food security are threatened and already-stressed areas are pushed further into poverty and destitution. To cope with this vulnerability and marginalization, farmers look for alternatives, and labor out-migration is an important and often-adopted strategy to diversify household livelihood portfolios (Choithani, 2017;Kim et al., 2019). Although the extreme weather conditions may hit the male and female farmers somewhat equally, the implications for coping and recovering from the shock may differ because of social and gender inequalities prevalent in the society. The Indian sociocultural contexts offer more freedom to men than to women to migrate out of their home area and explore opportunities for additional income. A survey from the Institute for Human Development, New Delhi, says that 70% of households where women are engaged in cultivation to have witnessed male labor out-migration. This leaves the women left behind obliged to IJCCSM 14,1 perform agricultural activities on top of the household responsibilities that already overburden them (Times of India, 2014). This may already limit their performance, but even worse, their limited access to knowledge and resources may lead to deteriorating agricultural production and also impact the overall well-being of the women involved, as is highlighted by many prior studies (Gartaula et al., 2012;Tamang et al., 2014;Patel et al., 2015).With the extent of these human and economic concerns of increased extreme climatic situations, and to safeguard farmers' well-being, there is a need to manage climate risks better and find a way forward. In an attempt to address the problem, the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center and consultative group for international agricultural research (CGIAR) Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CIMMYT-CCAFS), in collaboration with stakeholders at national and international levels, are working on the concept of climate-smart villages (CSVs). The CSV program addresses climatic risks from both technological and social perspectives. It provides gender-inclusive training to farming communities to scale climate-smart agricultural practices (CSAPs) up for sustainable agriculture and better mitigating the risks of climate change. Interventions ensuring economic access to resources need to be targeted and scaled to safeguard climate change mitigation and minimize productivity loss. In CSVs, farmers practice climate-smart agriculture (CSA), which is an approach that integrates the three dimensions of sustainable development (environmental, economic and social) by jointly addressing food security and climatic challenges through CSAPs (Sriram et al., 2019).The mitigation strategies such as food crops choice mix (or crop diversification), offfarm work, better farming practices, etc. ensure household income and food security and thereby reduces male out-migration. However, adopting the proven beneficial CSAPs requires adequate knowledge for their use, economic viability and broader scalability. Practical training and the provision of services are strategies that can make adoption easier. Given the immense role played by women in agriculture, it is vital to build women's capacities and ensure that they have sufficient knowledge and training to achieve gender equality in agriculture. It is also crucial to overcome the exclusion of women from decision-making processes and labor markets so that they can better cope with and adapt to the impacts of climate change (Sriram et al., 2019). However, there remains a gap in knowing to what extent and how the capacity enhancement of women in climate risk mitigation strategies can curtail migration and improve household food security and overall farm livelihoods.In this context, this paper investigates how CSAPs affect food security and, consequently, male labor out-migration in the state of Bihar, India. Our analysis shows that the adoption of CSAPs can reduce the probability of migrating by 21%, whereas women's literacy also reduces migration. Moreover, a narrowing of the gendered knowledge gap increases the adoption of CSAPs, thus improving food security and decreasing male out-migration. This paper concludes with insights into how the enhancement of gender-equitable knowledge relating to CSAPs is key to safeguarding sustainable farming systems and improving livelihoods.Gender and social differences are dynamic and nuanced within communities. Thus, an understanding of how these differences could affect implementation strategies and the need for climate information is critical in reaching the most vulnerable (Bernier, 2013). The primary form of gendered vulnerability in the context of agrarian distress emerges Household food security and labor migration from male out-migration, which affects the distribution of labor and resources. Sugden et al. (2014) observe that poverty, gender inequality, insecure land rights, heavy reliance on agriculture and less access to education and information are among the principal reasons for climate change vulnerabilities. At the same time, women are not only the passive victims of climate change but are also agents of hope for adapting to and mitigating abrupt climate change shocks. Women are also concerned about environmental issues and are highly supportive of policies aimed at restoring the environment. There are plenty of suggestions for gender-differentiated agricultural strategies aimed at adapting to climate change. Many studies claim that differences in men's and women's responsibilities, priorities and access to resources, training and services at the community and household levels are responsible for the gender gap in agriculture in many developing countries (Khatri-Chhetri et al., 2020). Although hotspots of women in agriculture are discussed to assess CSA interventions relevant for women, their potential to help women mitigate climatic risks in production and consumption is not well addressed. A recent study points out that some CSAPs have the potential to reduce women's labor drudgery, but their adoption depends on several social, economic and political factors. Notably, the prospect of negative implications for a specific group of women should not be ignored but addressed and mitigate challenges accordingly (Gartaula et al., 2020). India's agricultural labor force is reducing. In 1981, over 66% men and 83% women worked in agriculture, which in 2011 were reduced to about 50% for men and 65% for women (Pattnaik et al., 2018). This shows that although overall labor force engaged in agriculture is declining in India, women's involvement is still more than of men's, indicating women's paramount role in Indian agriculture. Their contributions to household livelihoods vary according to the region and the type of farming and cropping system but broadly include providing labor for crop and livestock production and household management. Of the 98 million women who live in rural areas and practice agriculture in India, about 37% are farmers, whereas 63% are agricultural wage-laborers (Chanana-Nag and Aggarwal, 2018). Statistics show that 48% of India's self-employed farmers are women. About 75 million Indian women are engaged in the dairy industry compared to 15 million men. Likewise, 20 million women practice animal husbandry compared to 1.5 million men (Ghosh and Ghosh, 2014). Women are generally involved in various cultivation and post-harvest operations like storage; these activities are essential for the well-being of farm households but are often not included in the definition of economically beneficial activities. A substantial proportion of rural women who are active in farming are counted merely as unpaid family labor.Despite their crucial role, women's contributions to agriculture in India tend not to be valued in the same way as men's, and often women are not involved in agricultural decision-making. Men's departure from agriculture to non-agricultural jobs is increasing across South Asia, including Bihar, India. This process of agricultural feminization, sometimes, linked with women's better space in the agricultural decisionmaking. However, men's exit from this sector does not necessarily leverage the decision-making capacity of the women left-behind in agriculture (Pattnaik et al., 2018). Moreover, women's increased participation to some extent increased their role in the agricultural decision-making, but the \"final\" decisions should still be approved by men, even if they stay outside, as evident in Karnataka, India (Goudappa et al., 2012) and in Jhapa, Nepal (Gartaula, 2012).Like in other areas in the region, Bihar's agricultural sector is also feminized, with over 50% of the total farming workforce consisting of women, according to a report on women in the informal economy of Bihar, Asian Development Research Institute. Additionally, women make up 79.5% of the workforce engaged in animal husbandry in the state (The Times of India, 2014). This underscores the significant role of women in contributing to household income and food and nutrition security.There is a clear understanding of the positive correlation between income and food security. By food security, we refer to not only having enough meals but also meeting the nutritional needs of the men, women and children of the household. The ratio of perconsumer unit calorie intake to the measure of per capita calorie intake may vary widely between individual households because of inter-household differences in agesex composition. Thus, for a household with no children, the two measures will be much closer than for a household with a large proportion of children and babies. Hence, the per-consumer unit calorie intake analyzed in the study gives a much better idea of the adequacy of calorie intake at the individual household level. For India as a whole, the share taken by cereals in household consumer expenditure is 10.7% for the rural sector. In rural Bihar, total spending on food is calculated as 59.3% of total household expenditure, 15% of which is spent on cereals, contributing 61.6% of calories. Cereals are followed by milk products, oils, pulses, and so on. Thus, any effect of climate change on cereal production or consumption will have a significant impact on the food and nutrition security of the consumer units. In our paper, we emphasize how farmers are practicing CSAPs to safeguard production, ensuring higher yields and income and thereby securing consumer consumption.With limited access to resources and decision-making, women play a vital role in forming mitigation strategies while adopting CSAPs for improved household food security. To the best of our knowledge, none of the previous studies have investigated the impact of climatic risk in terms of male out-migration, causing feminization of agriculture. The results substantiate how CSAPs can be promoted among women farmers to support them in mitigating climatic risks in agriculture, combating the effects of these on yield and securing household food security. Integrating the structural intersections between climatic risks, gendered knowledge, migration and food security is necessary to make informed policy decisions that will impact at scale (Sugden et al., 2014).This study was carried out in Samastipur and Vaishali districts of Bihar, India. The study area map (Supplementary Figure 1) presents the geographic location of the villages surveyed. Both districts are located in central Bihar and have similar geographic conditions and similar literacy averages, thus negating the scope of disparity in CSAPs adoption.To assess the impact of climatic risk on farmers' mitigation strategies, defined by the awareness and adoption of CSAPs by both men and women, we used a mixed research design that combined qualitative and quantitative methods of data collection and analysis. The qualitative data were collected using focus group discussions (FGDs) conducted separately for men and women. The FGDs were crucial to identify the domains to be included in the survey questionnaire as part of the quantitative data Household food security and labor migration collection. The survey was performed by a team of men and women enumerators to ensure capturing the responses of women respondents appropriately. In the survey, we captured the farmers' understanding of how they had experienced climate change and the benefits of project interventions aimed at CSA adoption over time. We also collected comparison data on the impact of climatic risks on household food security among adopters and non-adopters.The survey was conducted in 100 households where both men and women from the same household were interviewed, making a total sample size of 200. In total, 10 CSVs were selected in Samastipur and Vaishali districts for data collection. From each CSV, 10 households comprising five adopter and five non-adopter households were randomly selected and interviewed. Interviewing both male and female respondents of the same household helped us to capture perspectives of both genders and to map out the gender gap about issues like crop yields, income, migration, food consumption, technology adoption and other demographic variables. We aimed to assess the determinants defining CSAPs adoption among men and women and resulting behavioral changes.We observed the impact of the CSAP interventions for over 10 years. Before 2007, the farmers carried out their usual agricultural practices, and from then onwards, training in building knowledge about CSA was initiated in the districts as mentioned above of Bihar. Hence, the year 2007 was taken as the base year from which data were collected based on recall, and 2016 was taken as the current year. However, spillovers because of improper record-keeping by farmers and insufficient knowledge of females remained a constraint to the analysis.The average yield and income indices of CSAP adopters were analyzed to estimate the effects of adoption on yield and income and to capture post-adoption percentage changes. The indices generated were derived only from the adopters. Yield and income were not calculated separately for men and women as both reported the household data; however, because of inefficient farm budgeting and differences in farm information and decisionmaking, the indices reported by men and women did differ.A knowledge index (KI) was generated to capture the current knowledge level, which mapped out the farmers' understanding of CSAPs. In our study, the CSAPs included nine technologies: laser land leveler, green seeker, multi-crop planter, harvester and thresher, zero tillage, leaf color chart, nutrient expert tool, relay planter and bed planter. This index ranked different individuals based on their knowledge about the practical usage and adoption of the technologies. The index was developed for men and women separately to assess the difference in technical knowledge about CSAPs; this is discussed in the following subsection.The indices were generated based on the principal component analysis (PCA) of the variables related to CSAPs knowledge, yield and income. PCA is used to exploit variation in variables to generate weights and corresponding ranks for households and individuals in the large dimensionality of the data (Jolliffe and Cadima, 2016). PCA provides a weighted rank based on the variation across a large dimension of variables as compared to some other measures that are based on means making it less susceptible to biasedness owing to extreme values. Various other studies have used PCA to construct indices with discrete data (Kurbanoglu et al., 2006;Filmer and Pritchett, 2001).The male and female respondents were asked to respond to a given statement on a fivepoint Likert scale 1 = very low, 2 = low, 3 =average, 4 =high, 5 = very high. The five-point scales were reconfigured to three-point scales to show a pattern of reduced (for very low and low), unchanged (for average) and improved (for high and very high), and a tabular analysis was performed.The PCA technique and the derivation of indices is discussed briefly below; we normalize the N indicators as follows:where X is the responses for i indicators, 1 to N for kth individual.The above adjustment transforms all the selected variables on the 0-1 scale. The value of 0 is assigned to the individual with the lowest value of the selected knowledge indicator, and a value of 1 is assigned to the individual with the highest value of the selected knowledge indicator.The results for the eigenvalues (l 1 . . . :l n Þ are presented in Supplementary tables 7, 9 and 11, respectively, for knowledge, income and yield.Eigenvectors as in Supplementary Tables 8, 10 and 12 are obtained for knowledge, income and yield.Finally, the index is computed as a weighted sum of N principal components and l 1 . . . . . . :l n eigenvalues, where weights are the variances of successive principle components as follows:The index is monotonous, with higher index values indicating higher knowledge levels related to better farming techniques. The index is generated for males and females separately, providing an opportunity to assess the gender gap in technical expertise in farming. A separate analysis at the village level provides important information on Household food security and labor migration differences across villages in farm knowledge and indicates the direction to follow in policy design. The efficacy of CSA options in terms of their benefits to both men and women stands to lose out if the gender gap in agriculture is not considered (Nelson and Huyer, 2016), and hence, the KI is used to measure the gap and form corrective measures. The KI not only helps compare the information levels on various climate-smart practices across villages and gender gap in information but also enables to study the association and impact of these variations on socio-economic outcomes such as CSAP adoption, migration and consumption. Impact analysis -To understand the effect of the KI, female literacy, training on CSAPs, household size and alternative livelihood activities on the adoption of CSAPs, migration and nutritional security, we used impact analysis using the following formula. The adoption of CSAPs also depends on landholding, other livelihood options, and the availability of required resources. Quisumbing and Pandolfelli (2010) highlight that other socioeconomic parameters such as age, marital status, education level and landholding size can affect agricultural technology adoption. These are therefore included as controls in the impact analysis for CSAPs adoption to circumvent omitted variable bias as follows:where, k is the individual, s is the state and X ks comprises the other control variables. The model is estimated using logistic regression that estimates the probability of CSAPs adoption as a function of KI and training. The binary values \"1\" and \"0\" represent adoption and non-adoption, and if we assume that, this probability follows the logistic curve as denoted by the following logistic function:The probability of adoption can be modeled as follows:where P M ¼ 1jX 1 ; X 2 ; . . . :; X K ð Þ is the probability that the value of the dependent variable, CSAP adoption, takes the value 1 (Hu and Lo, 2007). X i represents the vector of independent variables, KI, training and other controls.Another key was to study the effect of CSAPs adoption, female literacy and age of the migrant men. We hypothesize that CSAPs adoption would raise the productive capacity of farmers and minimize risks and that similarly, a higher degree of female literacy would correspond to better decision-making and farm budgeting, resulting in increased income. Such factors are imperative to higher productivity and improved standards of living, further negating the need for migration. Poor nutrition standards, on the other hand, could be a result of low productivity and income levels, increasing the probability of migrating to find an alternate source of earnings. The analysis also controls for factors that may affect migration and lead to omitted variable bias if excluded from the estimation. The current estimates are derived through logistic regression models similar to those explained in the previous section, with the variable of interestthe dependent variable, migrationbeing a response variable with the response as either a \"yes\" or a \"no.\" Equation (2) below represents the logistic regression model for estimation. IJCCSM 14,1The control variables include household size, land size, KI, OBC and SC/ST. Model 1 contains only CSAP adoption as the independent variable.The literature suggests that the risk of food security increases with increased volatility in climatic conditions (Campbell et al., 2016). We hypothesize that when faced with climatic risk, it is more likely that non-adopters will reduce their consumption compared to CSAPs adopters. A farmer who has a large land size would also be less affected by climate risk, as he is able to practice a diversified cropping system giving higher yields and income.Ordinary least square estimates are derived from studying the impact of CSAPs adoption on nutrition intake as per the equation below. The control variables include female literacy, migration, age, household size, land size, OBC and SC/ST.The design of this study was not a systematic observation of transformative changes in terms of gender roles and relations. This snapshot data collected from the areas where some climate risks mitigation strategies are applied, and we wanted to know how male and female farmers respond to that. Therefore, the analysis of this paper should not be viewed as a full scale gender studies that have systematic observation of changes and gendered responses to the interventions. Moreover, it is important to note that this paper is not an independent impact evaluation of the CSV program that is being implemented in Bihar, India, but our attempt is to showcase how the men and women farmers experience the CSAPs in the research areas.Yield and income indices were 0.799 and 0.671 for men, which are slightly higher values, than 0.686 and 0.571 for women, respectively. Results from more than 15 CSA interventions in Nepal show that women's participation in different agricultural activities were found to potentially reduce women's drudgery in agriculture and improve productivity and farm income (Khatri-Chhetri et al., 2019). Another study conducted in India also observes the potential of CSAPs to reduce women's labor drudgery (Gartaula et al., 2020), indicating that adopters of CSAPs tend to be less affected by climatic risks.Climate-smart agricultural practices adoption, migration and literacy Supplementary Figure 2 presents the trend of CSAPs adoption with respect to male outmigration in the period between 2007 and 2016. (innovators and early adopters), 83.6% of male farmers did not migrate; of those, 78% adopted CSAPs during that specific period. There has been a considerable change in the nature and causes of migration. Recent years have witnessed greater migration rates among the labor force in search of a livelihood, mainly for a more extended period of time (De Haan, 1999;Rodgers and Rodgers, 2001;Sharma et al., 2000). One of the more significant impacts of labor out-migration is the supply of remittances to the migrants' households, a significant non-farm source of income, depicting the severity of migration in the area. The remitted money increases the small household income of about Rs 6,426 per month; approximately, 60% of this derives from crop and livestock production, and the rest seems to be supplied by wages from local off-farm labor and remittances from migrant workers (The Hindu, 2017). The migrants' income at their destination largely depends on the type of occupations they are involved in, the duration of the work and the personal endowments of the migrant workers, such as level of education, skill, years of experience, etc. Because most of the migrant workers possess low private endowments, they are generally absorbed by the informal sector in irregular or casual employment that have abysmally low earnings. However, declining employment opportunities in their home area and the expectation of finding remunerative employment at their destination keep migrant workers tied there. Because the nature and patterns of migration in the research areas do not necessarily yield a large supply of remittances, interventions such as CSAPs do have an impact on curtailing migration by providing high-income and low-cost technologies. Our data highlight the fact that adopters are less likely to migrate compared to non-adopters. Among the 94 adopters, 17% were migrants, whereas, among the 92 non-adopters, 52% were migrants. In a situation where there has been an alarming rate of out-migration (from rural Bihar in the recent past), CSAPs can play an important role in curtailing this phenomenon by transferring the monetary paybacks together with delivering environmental benefits.Supplementary Figure 3 shows that the adoption of CSAPs also differs from farmers' levels of education. We have categorized education as illiterate (no schools), primary, secondary, senior secondary and graduate levels or above. Individuals possessing primary, secondary or higher levels of education tend to adopt CSAPs. We observe that illiterate farmers are more resistant to adopting new technologies, which is the main bottleneck for scaling. This validates the notion that knowledge of and training in CSAPs increase adoption because a literate and well-educated farmer is obviously better able to understand the technologies and related benefits. The resources, knowledge and capacity required to adopt a new CSA practice can be significant.Data reveal a stronger relationship between education and migration. Illiterate people are not able to perform advanced agricultural operations efficiently, are usually involved in lowpaid labor activities and tend to migrate in search of jobs. Highly educated people are seen to migrate more, as they have better earning opportunities in cities. Education is seen as strongly linked to migration (Rajan, 2013).Supplementary Figure 4 suggests that irrespective of the level of education, adopters are less likely to migrate. Over 85% of adopters with primary education do not migrate, whereas, with the same level of education, 56.8% of non-adopters migrate. This could be attributed to the higher profits realized from CSAPs that encourage adoption. Farmers with higher education are more likely to adopt and not migrate, as they are in a better position to understand the benefits of conservative agriculture. In our study, we observed that 85.2% of farmers with secondary education, and 84.6% of those with a bachelor's degree or above, were adopters and did not migrate.Irrespective of adoption, approximately, half of the farmers were non-migrants. From the policy perspective, there is a scope and a need for interventions to curtail migration aimed at IJCCSM 14,1 a better education, capacity building and scaling of CSAPs with a focus on women. Observing the role of female education on migration, we observed that if women were highly educated, men were less likely to migrate, as shown in Supplementary Figure 5. If a woman in the same household has a bachelor's degree, only 20% of men migrate, whereas 42.1% of men migrate if a woman is illiterate. We also observed that men did not migrate if a woman in the same household had primary or secondary education in 65.1% and 84.2% of cases, respectively. These quantitative estimates are also supported by the qualitative response of one of the male adopters who had migrated and whose wife had secondary education, who stated, \"My wife plays a very important role in farm decision-making. As we are aware of the benefits of CSAPs, her education, and my exposure to training help us achieve good profits. Not only her education supports in farming but also to take care of livestock, providing us additional income for children's education.\" These qualitative and quantitative findings justify the interventions targeting women's capacity building by providing training and knowledge.From the above statement and other field observations, the role of educated women in reducing low-paid out-migration and concentrating the household labor force on agriculture and allied activities becomes clearer. Although education plays an important role, literacy rates in India are low and witness significant gaps. As per the 2011 census, male and female literacy rates were 73. 4% and 53.3%,respectively,in Bihar [1]. In this context, increased women's education may help households in several ways as follows:Women may be better off in terms of managing households and agricultural (through extension education they receive).It may reduce men's out-migration, as men also see more opportunities locally and be with the family. It may eventually increase adoption of CSAPs.Figure 2 shows that a higher KI is indicative of better knowledge. Among adopters, the KIs for men and women were 0.717 and 0.527, whereas for non-adopters, they were 0.614 and 0.388, respectively. Data suggest that the male adopters are 1.36 times more knowledgeable than their female counterparts. Among non-adopters, men are 1.58 times better informed than women about CSAPs. This reflects a knowledge gap between men and women farmers in terms of adopting CSAPs. This corresponds with the results found in other studies that reflect on women's (as opposed to men's) vulnerability to the adverse impacts of climate change because of greater poverty, less education and training and less access to institutional support (Yadav and Lal, 2018;Goh, 2012). Women, however, play a strategic role in economic activities. Rather than merely supplying labor, they possess detailed knowledge of agriculture and plants and plant products for food, medicine, fish farming and animal feed. Women today are central to the selection, breeding, cultivation, preparation and harvesting of food crops (Weerakoon and Motebennur, 2017). Apart from their pivotal role in the cultivation of staple crops, they are primarily responsible for producing secondary crops, such as pulses and vegetables, which are often the only source of nutrition available to their families. Thus, we require plans for strategic integrated farming interventions to enhance women's participation by increasing their knowledge and endowment of resources.To gain a better understanding of the gendered nature of KIs across the region, a villagewise analysis was performed as presented in Supplementary Figure 6. Detailed analysis from the set of 10 CSVs suggests a critical piece of information, highlighting the differences Household food security and labor migration between men' and women's KI and the factors behind them presented and described in Supplementary Table 1. Besides, we also analyzed CSA technology-specific gendered KI to help design technology-specific interventions, as shown in Supplementary Table 2. The World Bank considers the KI as an economic indicator to measure a country's ability to generate, adopt and diffuse knowledge. The report shows that India ranks 109th out of 145 countries with a score of 3.1. Of the three pillars of the knowledge economyeducation and human resources; innovation systems; and information and communication technology, India ranks highest in the area of innovation with several examples of low-cost innovative techniques that have emerged in rural India (Livemint, 2014). Innovative and cost-effective techniques lead the discussion for the adoption and scaling of CSAPs. They combine both high-and low-cost machinery, but when it comes to the benefit-cost analysis, they lead to significant profit-making technologies. The challenge, therefore, is the widespread diffusion of knowledge about these technologies in rural communities. There have been several initiatives made by CIMMYT and its partners to make farmers climate-smart and to increase yields, income, food security, adaptation and climate-risk mitigation sustainably.We analyzed the food and nutrition security scenario, where farmers' coping strategy was to alter their consumption pattern for different food groups if they fell short of supplies because of climatic stress. The mean reduction in consumption was calculated as a weighted average of the responses to the percentage reduction in each food category that was experienced with weights and compared between adopting and non-adopting respondents and among males, females and children (Supplementary Table 3). The average consumption of pulses, eggs, meat, vegetables, cereals, legumes and fruits was reduced less by adopters than non-adopters across all social categoriesmales, females and children. In other words, the impact of climatic risk on nutrition intake is more severe for non-adopters, thus making it necessary for farmers to adopt CSAPs to mitigate risks. Food category-wise, the highest impact on the mean reduction in consumption under climatic risks for both adopters and non-adopters was on the consumption of eggs and meat. Cereals contribute approximately 62% of total calories consumed, equivalent to 1,748 calories/day. The consumption of cereals, which are a major source of energy, was less affected among adopters than among non-adopters. Legumes were majorly affected by climatic risks among non-adopters, despite being a major source of calories. Pulses, vegetables, legumes and fruits were comparatively less affected among adopters; on average, adopters reduced their consumption by 10.53%, whereas non-adopters reduced it by 21.76%. With such a significant reduction in consumption, non-adopters tended to fall below the recommended calorie intake levels. The difference highlights the fact that food security for adopters is ensured as they experience higher yields and income, which allows them to mitigate risk in the case of climatic adversities.Based on the data obtained from NSSO (REPORT 560, 2014), we estimated the average daily calorie intake in rural Bihar as 2,731 kcal, obtained from different food groups (Supplementary Table 4). The report illustrates that the number of meals consumed by men for 30 days (71.2) is almost the same as the number consumed by women (70.9). It was also observed that children were not discriminated against in any age group and were provided equally well with food at home or school (Supplementary Table 5). Neither did we observe any discrimination in food consumption between men and women across age groups. Thus, under normal conditions, we should assume that nutritional requirements are equally addressed as long as sufficient energy-rich foods are consumed.Table 1 shows that the KI has a positive impact on the adoption of CSAPs. Model 1 shows an expected increase of 1.57 in the log odds of adoption with every unit increase in the KI. Adoption may be impacted by several other factors such as farmer literacy; availability of training; farmers' characteristics, such as gender, caste, education, social and economic capital; farmland characteristics; access to market and extension services; and climatic risks experienced by the farmers (Aryal et al., 2018). It is imperative to partial out the effects of such variables to obtain consistent estimates for KI. Model 2 includes other impacting variables such as circumventing omitted variable bias. The results are significant and remain robust to the inclusion of other variables. The estimate suggests that adoption of CSAPs increases the log of odds to adoption to 2.36. The inclusion of other variables leads to an increase in the probability of CSAPs adoption with an increase in the KI, indicating a possible underestimation of the estimate in the absence of the control variables [2]. Other similar studies conducted in India (Aryal et al., 2018) and elsewhere (Tran et al., 2019) also observed that farmers' knowledge about CSAPs is vital to address climatic risks and increase adoption of such technologies. It is thus essential to improve farmers' knowledge of CSAPS to increase their adoption. Female literacy is also shown to have a negative and significant effect on male outmigration. The results are again robust across the models. Model 3 suggests that an increase in female literacy by one unit reduces the log of odds to migrate by 0.37. Put differently, the probability of migration reduces by 40% upon adoption of CSA technologies and practices.A rise in the age of an individual is also seen to be negatively associated with migration.Rural youths leave their residence searching for better employment opportunities elsewhere within and outside the country; the main push factors are less agricultural production, local unemployment and other socioeconomic drivers (Patel et al., 2015;Choithani, 2017;Deshinkar and Start, 2003). Labor out-migration could be a climate-change adaptation strategy, as the supply of remittances contributes to household income and food security (Jha et al., 2018). Our study complements these studies but also demonstrates that adoption of CSAPs could be a strategy to reduce labor out-migration and promote the local economy.Model 1 results in Table 3 suggest that CSAPs adoption leads to a rise in nutrition intake by 5.92 units. The estimate is found to be significant and robust to the inclusion of other controls such as age, household size, etc. Men's migration tends to increase nutrition intake deficiency by almost five units. In the previous results, it is shown that in the case of food deficiency, men migrate. This highlights the vicious cycle of food deficiency among migrating households. To break this cycle, proper emphasis should be placed on addressing climatic risks and harnessing women's potential. An increase in land size also tends to reduce the decline in consumption and is robust at a 5% level of significance. Thus, well-endowed farmers are less impacted by climatic risks. To address the situation of smallholders, CSAPs offer the best interventions to secure household food security. CSAPs adopters can sustain a higher standard of food consumption. These results contradict other studies that look at migration as a household strategy to cope with poverty and food insecurity (Sunam, 2017;Patel et al., 2015;Kim et al., 2019) and as an adaption strategy to cope with climate change (Mcleman and Smit, 2006); this may be because of differences in the causes and consequences of migration in Bihar and elsewhere.In this paper, we focused on how the adoption of CSAPs influences farmers' decisions on rural-urban migration and how it impacts the overall household food security in two relatively food insecure Bihar districts. The overall low economic development and gender and social inequalities, especially in rural villages, are the most important reasons for the high incidence of rural out-migration in South Asia. The solution lies in the rapid economic development of rural areas. We observed low, average knowledge indices of the farming community and that women are in a disadvantaged position in the two study areas of Bihar, India. Thus, informed policy decisions are urgently needed. Business models for creating gender-equitable employment opportunities, improved education levels and training packages should be priority targets for investment and benefit from strategic short-, medium-and long-term interventions. A socio economic-environmental benefits portfolio should include focused, improved access and control for women over resources, ensuring enhancement of their decisionmaking and reducing low-paid workers' migration.This paper has highlighted the knowledge gaps that exist between men and women farmers in terms of CSAPs. Therefore, a policy intervention for an equitable genderresponsive development action plan is needed. The results suggest that a reduced knowledge gap would increase CSAPs adoption and consequently reduce the likelihood of migration. This is especially important in the research area as the labor migration is mostly a destitute migration, and if it could be reduced by improved social and economic conditions locally, it would benefit the rural youths in the research areas. The subsequent benefits, such as improved household income, proper farm budgeting and enhanced household food and nutrition security, would help improve the productive capacity of the society. Although the role of women in curtailing migration and ensuring household food and nutrition security (through production and consumption) is significant, there persists discrimination in wages and working status for the female workforce in agriculture. This wage inequality needs important consideration in policy so that both male and female farmers would be encouraged. This paper has demonstrated the need to implement policies and initiatives taken by the government to promote CSAPs for mitigating climatic risks; these policies and initiatives should aim to empower women and make women's labor as agricultural workers visible. One strategic intervention could be to enhance the adoption of CSAPs with a gender lens, endowing women with better decision-making. The direction should be toward gender Household food security and labor migration equity, aiming toward gender equality, targeting improved societal productive capacity and ensuring a sustainable integrated farming system. Although the adoption of CSAPs helps minimize the impacts of climatic risks significantly and promotes gender equality while relieving the pressure on government expenditure in massive amounts of compensation paid to farmers as relief at times of climatic risks. Its success, after all, relies on political will and commitment to the public. Her work focuses on generating knowledge, building capacity and learning on climate smart agriculture practices that can lead to equitable outcomes for women and other marginalized social groups in agriculture. Her particular interest is in finding innovative ways how sustainable shifts toward empowerment, equality, poverty reduction and nutrition security and sustainability can be achieved that leads to income and food security under progressive climate change and variability.Deepak Bijarniya is Research Scientist at International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT). He associates in the sustainable intensification research, specially related to gender and social inclusion research portfolio in India. His research covers the issues of gender and social inclusion, youth and agriculture, climate change, food security, labor migration and human wellbeing. Deepak holds a PhD in Plant Sciences with interdisciplinary focus on integrated management of plant diseases from University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, India.Dil Bahadur Rahut is Senior Research Fellow at Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, Japan. Before joining ADBI, Dil was global program manager for the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre's (CIMMYT) socioeconomics and sustainable intensification programs. He previously worked for the Royal Monetary Authority of Bhutan's Research and Statistics Department. He also served as a research fellow at the WorldFish Centre; senior fellow and Japan chair at the Indian Council for Research in International Economic Relations; chief of research, planning, and monitoring and Visa/Mastercard director at the Bank of Bhutan Ltd; and assistant professor of development economics at South Asian University. He has a PhD in development economics from the University of Bonn's Center for Development Research, a master's degree in economic policy management from the University of Tsukuba, and an MBA specializing in finance and Bachelor of Science degree from India. He has over 100 publications in Scopus indexed journals focusing on development issues across Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.M.L. Jat is Principal Scientist/Systems Agronomist at International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT. He has devoted over two decades to intensively work on basic and applied science in agronomy, soils and environment and promote conservation agriculture-based sustainable intensification in smallholder farming systems of Asia. His research on CA has provided scientifically sound basis and directions for promoting sustainable intensification through policy changes and led to impact at scale in smallholder systems of south Asia. Research results of his group have been well documented in over 300 peer reviewed high impact journal articles, book chapters, books, manuals, monographs and proceedings. He has served several reputed international and national scientific bodies and fora. A fellow of National Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dr Jat has several awards and recognitions to his credit. M.L. Jat is the corresponding author and can be contacted at: M.Jat@cgiar.org For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website: www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm Or contact us for further details: permissions@emeraldinsight.com Household food security and labor migration","tokenCount":"7401"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0597588530.json b/data/part_2/0597588530.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8cffb69c68af691bf64b1aa31ad3553b9675d415 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0597588530.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"bceb47e78082264e80851d5a319c8349","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/934bcea4-78ca-4af2-b57e-645dd14515c1/retrieve","id":"425340380"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"10d2d832-6671-477e-9333-1db11d7ea2cc","pagecount":"4","content":"If 10% of auto rice mills operate at approximately 50% lower capacity a fortnight due to weather related supply disruption, it costs around BDT 11.17 million⁷ If 1% of the approximately 7 million⁶ agricultural borrowers default due to weather-related impact, it is estimated to be worth BDT 2.83 billion. An anticipated offset of 10% is estimated to be worth BDT 283 million. Impact-Harvesting and Machinery Opportunities-Harvesting and Machinery Market size-Seed Production Opportunities-Seed Production DCAS Innovation-processing Drought-increases need for irrigation, which significantly increases cost of seed production.Heavy rainfall events force mills to run at approximately 50% of their milling capacity. These events can also reduce grain quality supplied to 2,847 auto rice mills.In Bangladesh, the number of registered combined harvesters (CH) in 2023 is 6,000 with an average of 30 operation days per year per CH. The average harvested area per CH per day is 4.86 hectares, and the cost of harvesting by CH per hectare is BDT16,367. Loss of one operation day for 20% CH cause a revenue loss of BDT 95 million. (BBS, 2019;DAE, 2023;Kabir et al., 2020) 2 BDT35.20 million (Additional paddy transport cost) Boro rice area in Bangladesh is 4.75 million hectares and average transport cost of harvested paddy from farmer's field to farmer's home is BDT 3,705 per hectare. If 1% of the Boro rice area is affected by an untimely rainfall, the total additional cost of transportation is BDT 35.20 million taking 20% increase in transportation cost. (BBS, 2019; T.S Amjath-Babu, 2022) 3 BDT70 million (Aman seed production cost) The average cost of rice seed production per ton is BDT 50,000 and the total Aman season seed supply from formal sector is 69,870 tones. So, 20% increase in cost of seed production due to drought event, impacting 10% of total supply, the increase cost is BDT 70 million. (BSA, 2023) 4 BDT 558 million loss due to unsold seeds Total long-duration rice seeds sold in Bangladesh is 93,035 tons (Covering 40% of total area) A 20% decrease in demand for long-duration seeds due to delay transplanting means 18,607 tons will probably be sold as grain at BDT30,000 per ton instead of seed selling price of BDT 60,000 per ton, leading to a revenue loss of BDT 558 million. If a climate service can offset 1% of this cost, it could be worth BDT 5.58 million. (BSA, 2023;T.S Amjath-Babu et al., 2023) 5 BDT176 million additional logistic cost for unsold rice seeds The logistic cost required to return the unsold rice seeds from dealers to the company for storage is BDT 6,000 per ton. So, the total additional logistic cost when farmers switch to short-duration from long-duration rice seeds will be BDT 112 million.(BSA, 2023) 6 7 million agricultural borrowers Total agricultural loans disbursed in the country is BDT 283 billion including BDT 248 billion from micro finance institutions (MFIs) (45% of total loan) and BDT 35 billion from Banks. Estimated number of agricultural borrowers is 7 million, assuming an average agricultural loan size of BDT 40,000 per farmer). If 1% of agricultural borrowers default due to weather-related impacts, it is worth BDT 2.83 billion. (BB, 2023;PKSF, 2022) ⁷BDT11.17 million (Revenue loss of millers per fortnight) Milling capacity of 2,847 auto rice mills is 74,511 ton per fortnight. If 10% of the mills operate at 50% lower capacity for a fortnight, revenue loss will be BDT 11.17 million . (Assuming profit margin of BDT3,000 per ton in processing). (MoF, 2023) Exchange rate 1 USD= BDT 110.25 as of December 10, 2023(BB, 2023).","tokenCount":"586"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0612641979.json b/data/part_2/0612641979.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4e9d77693a850c717d05d109b43275d44122a80f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0612641979.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"cde7903cecacf522c099ab9fa84c3837","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/c13f85fe-f07b-480f-ab1a-57f9a6fccd69/retrieve","id":"868908259"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"1267396c-90c9-47b5-96c0-299ec12f22d4","pagecount":"4","content":"Conservation agriculture is a promising technology for supporting sustainable increases in productivity. It helps farmers achieve more reliable and often higher yields while reducing production costs, increases dietary diversity, improves soil structure and fertility, maximizes nutrient and water-use efficiency, and controls some pests and diseases.While the biophysical benefits in terms of improved soil and fertility will be achieved over several cropping seasons, farmers are likely to improve their food security and incomes as a result of higher yields after only two seasons, with reduced labor demand for land preparation and weed control.Agro-ecological conditions: Conservation agriculture systems are used currently by farmers cultivating a wide range of crops under many different types of soils and environments. The greatest improvements over conventional tillage occur in water-scarce environments. Conservation agriculture is also most beneficial where farming is subjected to labor or power constraints (animal or tractor), and where environmental degradation has resulted in accelerated soil erosion and low soil fertility. Heavy soils requiring a laborious tillage process are also suited to minimum or no tillage.Livestock: Conservation agriculture systems are highly successful where there is little livestock pressure, since crop residues can be left to cover the soil surface rather than used as fodder. However, where livestock is more common and crop residues are required as fodder, there may be trade-offs between feeding the residues to livestock or retaining them on the soil surface. Mixed crop-livestock farmers can start conservation agriculture by using no tillage on a small portion of the farm where they can add sufficient crop residues. Once the plots under conservation agriculture are established and yields have increased, farmers can use part of the crop residues for feed and part as ground cover, starting another small no-tillage plot and eventually expanding to other areas of the farm. Conservation agriculture stops the practice of burning, thereby reducing carbon emissions.The requirement for crop rotation to increase soil fertility, and reduce pest and diseases creates diversity by introducing leguminous crops, but also means that farmers need access to legume seed and markets for their produce. A lack of access to input/output markets can therefore hamper uptake of the crop rotation component by farmers living in remote areas with poor road infrastructure.Conservation agriculture systems can be applied equally by small-scale farmers with a limited land area and larger-scale farmers that have access to draft or tractor power. Producing large amounts of biomass requires application of sufficient nutrients through compost, manure, or inorganic fertilizer. Farmers who are unable to purchase fertilizer (due to lack of access, subsidies, or cash) may therefore not achieve the maximum potential benefits.Labor: Manual conservation agriculture systems require only a pointed stick to plant maize under the prevailing conditions without having to till the soil. Where animal traction is common, the dibble stick can be replaced by an animal-drawn ripper.A key ingredient is the availability of plant biomass to cover the soil surface and retain soil moisture. This is easily obtainable in agro-ecologies where farmers neither burn crop residues nor feed them to livestock.Crop management: Conservation agriculture requires crop diversification by rotating or intercropping maize with legumes or other cash crops. This is essential to reduce the spread of pests and diseases. Maize-legume intercropping is particularly beneficial; the legumes not only add nitrogen to the soil, they also provide nutritious food and are an additional source of biomass to use as mulch. Farmers with a rather small land area available should practice intercropping instead of crop rotation. The most suitable legumes for intercropping are pigeonpea and cowpea. In cooler climates they can also intercrop beans with maize. New research shows that farmers can grow two legume crops at the same time using the 'doubled-up' legume system (https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108796), without suffering from maize yield loss.Weed control: This is critical when farmers convert from conventional to conservation agriculture. Without weed control through tillage, farmers need to apply a comprehensive weed control strategy to avoid yield penalties. This could entail rotations with competitive legume species, judicious use of herbicides, and/or more intensive manual weed control, at least in the first years of conversion until the weed pressure drops.New mindset: Conservation agriculture requires a new way of planting crops without previous ploughing. This can be challenging for smallholders, extension agents, and researchers, at least in the beginning, and may require long-term testing and demonstration to convince users of its merits.Farmer Grace Malaitcha, from Zidyana, near Nkhotakota, Malawi at her maize plot which she cultivates using conservation agriculture (CA) practices. Photo credit: Patrick Wall/CIMMYT.Most staple crops can be grown successfully under manual conservation agriculture. In Malawi and Zambia, the technology was tested successfully with maize, sorghum, cowpea, soybean, bean, cotton, sunflower, and tobacco. Even crops such as groundnut and cassava can be produced under conservation agriculture, although harvesting such crops causes considerable soil movement. Green manure cover crops, shrubs, and leguminous trees are also suitable for cultivation under conservation agriculture and have proven effective in improving degraded landscapes, producing high-quality animal fodder, and supporting the sustainable productivity of multicrop systems. The maize-pigeonpea intercropping system, for example, has been adopted widely in southern Malawi and has proven successful as a source of food security and income. Farmers are continually balancing risks against opportunities. Moving to conservation agriculture requires careful evaluation and encouragement over several seasons, since the benefits are not immediate.Livestock: There may be a trade-off between feeding crop residues to livestock and leaving the biomass on the soil surface to improve soil fertility.Price fluctuations: Diversification to legume rotations or intercropping as cash crops can be risky due to fluctuating market prices.Weeds: These can be troublesome in the early stages of conservation agriculture and may require additional labor and/or use of herbicides. However, if prevented from seeding, weeds will diminish after two or three seasons.Soil organic matter: Breakdown of organic amendments in soils of low fertility may limit nitrogen availability to the plants due to proliferation of soil organisms (known as 'nitrogen lock-up'). This may affect initial plant growth. Careful nutrient management and rotation with leguminous crops can overcome this issue.Food security and incomes: Conservation agriculture leads to improved soil fertility and therefore to higher productivity. Yield benefits can be significant after two to five cropping seasons, with yield increases of up to 140% measured in drought years.The technology helps farming families to diversify their diets, since farmers usually plant leguminous crops in rotation or as intercrops with their cereals. In long-term on-farm trials this led to an increase in Crop Diversification Index on average from 0.4 to 0.5 (+25%) and a higher Food Consumption Score.No-tillage systems permit three to five times higher rates of water infiltration, raising soil moisture content by 25-50% compared with conventional tillage. This explains why the technology performs best in conditions of water scarcity.Soil structure and fertility: Soils managed under conservation agriculture have higher biological activity, with an increased concentration of earthworms, beetles, ants, and spiders. This provides superior biological control of insect pests, such as the recently introduced Fall Armyworm. Soil erosion can be 64% less in no-tillage systems, leading to decreased siltation of dams and rivers, and halting soil degradation.Soil carbon: Over time, there is a gradual increase in soil carbon (a 45% increase was measured in five years at the Chitedze Research Station, Malawi), although this depends on the residue management practice and the agro-ecological environment.Labor: There is a reduced labor demand for land preparation (15-25 labor hours per hectare less) and weeding (15 labor days per hectare less when herbicides are used). This gives farmers a higher gross margin by up to 260%. If controlled effectively and seeding is prevented, weed populations decrease after the first two or three seasons. Achieving the same harvest with less labor preferentially benefits women, who may use their time to perform more profitable tasks. ","tokenCount":"1290"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0643343021.json b/data/part_2/0643343021.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ed16b9334d94662f3e1b69ada0a2ffcdbb8d5b4c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0643343021.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"5f96068b40c7906808f1d75821cb2f08","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/b97c03b2-8116-496d-b2ad-3509aa27e74c/retrieve","id":"1784935190"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"80a00e13-c973-4a88-8501-5267bfbfa4c9","pagecount":"10","content":"During the first phase, the farmers received certified rice and maize seeds and some herbicides to aid their 2022 wet season farming. For the second phase, each farmer received 4bags of fertilizers, 4 liters of post-emergence herbicide, fungicide, and insecticide suited for their rice and maize plants. The farmers are expected to remit 4 bags of grains after harvest.Input financing is one of the ways through which the Activity supports over 60,000 smallholder farmers trained in Climate Smart and Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) in both Adamawa and Borno States.In continuation of input financing for 259 maize and rice farmers in Gombi and Song Local Government Areas of Adamawa State, USAID-funded Feed the Future Nigeria Integrated Agriculture Activity and Capital Agricultural Development Limited (CADL) commenced the second phase of the exercise in the month of July.Local Government, Adamawa State.Women beneficiaries in Gombi, Adamawa State. On a daily basis, Aishatu makes N400 to N500 profit. On market days, she makes between N700 and N800; approximately, N3.500 a week.\"Before now, I couldn't feed my children twice a day but now, I cook two to three quality meals for my children. I can also take care of some medical bills. I really appreciate IAA for bringing such an opportunity my way\", Aisha said. \"They helped change my orientation about seeds. I thought it was okay to purchase just any kind of seeds at the market. I didn't know buying just any kind of seeds would impact on the quality of crops produced\", admitted John.John received some improved rice and soybean seeds from his extension agent courtesy of the Activity and planted them during the last rainy season. For the rice, he didn't make much harvest due to the heavy rains and attacks by insurgents.He expected about 60 bags from 2 hectares but got 16 bags. However, the soybeans yielded much. He harvested 8 bags which he sold at N37,000 each.\"The money came at the right time. I needed to pay my children's fees. One of my children had just gained admission into Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria to study Chemistry. I didn't need to borrow money from anywhere for her to settle down in school. It was like a miracle. Thanks to IAA\", recounted John.John and some of his children Tomapepo:the Activity facilitated the provision of a grinding machine for each group. This is in conformity with the objectives of the USAID/USG Women Entrepreneurship and Economic Empowerment (WEEE) Act, 2018 which \"strengthens USAID's programming to promote gender equality and women's empowerment; builds upon the success of our work in financing microenterprises; and expands the universe of our potential partners\".Most of these recipients have indeed put to good use the machines they received with amazing results to show. \"We have been using the machine for the production of Tomapepo. One of our members, Mariya Mahmad, recently sold 146 bottles here in Kwaya and also in Abuja.Each bottle costs N1,500. Others are not doing badly in their sales well. When we are not producing Tomapepo, we are grinding pepper, beans, maize, and millet for peoplein the community\", Fatima explained.On a weekly basis, the group remits N2000 from grinding. They deduct maintenance and repair fees from this amount.\"One of our members was in dire need of money to buy her ward's JAMB form, we were able to loan her the money from what is generated from the machine. Other members also come to borrow from time to time and we lend them\".In January 2022, from the proceeds of the grinding machine, the group first purchased three 100kg bags of maize at N13,000. Then, they bought two more at N13,500. By June, they sold the stored grains at N20,000 per bag and made a profit of N34,000. To aid their farming, the group decided to buy 2 cartons of herbicide. This, they sold to members at subsidized rates.\"We, Progressive Women, have benefitted so much from Integrated Agriculture Activity. There is no doubt about it\", affirmed Fatima.The 16 members of Murna Group all received training on the production of Tomapepo in 2020 and received a grinding machine to support production. However, to ensure continuity and accountability, the group decided to empower a young woman with the skills and machinery needed for production.\"We couldn't find a more dedicated person to handle our group's Tomapepo production. Vashti Aliyu is just 22 years old. With two children to cater to, she lost her husband about a year ago. Moreso, she was unemployed at that time\", said Anna Sabe, a prominent member of the group.In February 2022, Vashti made and sold 60 bottles of Tomapepo at N1,200 each. When tomatoes are abundant, she makes for customers on demand.During the harvest of tomatoes last December, Vashti made the product and sold them around April/May this year. On a weekly basis, Vashti remits between N2000 and N2,500 grinding cereals and legumes for customers. During a certain festive period, Vashti remitted N15,000 to the group to our surprise. She transports the machine to wedding ceremonies to offer grinding services as well.\"God has really used these elderly women to bless me. Apart from the machine and skills I got from them. In the first year of learning Tomapepo, they sold to customers but halted the commercial sales of the product due to poor sales in the community. But rather than give up on production, they decided that they wanted the product for themselves.Once tomatoes, pepper, and onions are abundant, they buy the commodities with the money realized from daily commercial grinding (they make between N500 and N700 daily; N5,000 and above during festive seasons). They produce bottles of Tomapepo and distribute them among themselves.\"Producing Tomapepo together helps unite us. In fact, that is not the only thing uniting us. The ability to loan ourselves profit from the grinding machine is a plus for us. Also, our decision to buy two bags of maize (N15,000 each) has brought so much satisfaction to the members. We intend to sell these grains during the peak sales period….We are seriously considering resuming the commercial production of Tomapepo, now that we are more united\", Lydia said. To achieve these objectives, the Activity works with a coalition of public and private sector partners to facilitate improved agro-input and extension advisory services to serve vulnerable populations; strengthen the institutions that form the market system and the networks that serve smallholder farmers disenfranchised by conflict, and facilitate the engagement of youth and women in economic and entrepreneurial activities M o b i l e : + 2 3 4 9 0 6 2 9 2 7 8 3 9 E m a i l : P . S i l w a l @ c g i a r . o r g","tokenCount":"1117"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0660652973.json b/data/part_2/0660652973.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2f010082f0367c8631a16dcae5508d9d520b0718 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0660652973.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"faee691243560eaeeed1193bf7416e10","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/50f55e19-18c7-44d5-80ac-caafdee10b7d/retrieve","id":"-2104901198"},"keywords":["Consumer preferences","Indigenous sheep","Linear body measurements","Production system"],"sieverID":"e4656e8d-942b-4a9d-b5c2-b82016cf2f3c","pagecount":"133","content":"By my signature below, I declare and affirm that this Thesis is my own research work. I have followed all ethical and technical principles of scholarship in the preparation, data collection, data analysis and compilation of this Thesis. Any scholarly matter that is included in the Thesis has been given recognition through citation. This Thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for MSc degree at the Haramaya University. The Thesis is deposited in the Haramaya University Library and is made available to borrowers under the rules of the Library. I solemnly declare that this Thesis has not been submitted to any other institution anywhere for the award of any academic degree, diploma, or certificate.Brief quotations from this Thesis may be made without requiring special permission provided that accurate and complete acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotations from or reproduction of this Thesis in whole or in part may be granted by the Head of the School or Department when in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interest of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author of the Thesis.mid-altitude. The primary reason of keeping sheep was for cash income and saving across the two agro ecologies. The major feed resources for sheep during the wet and dry seasons were natural pasture and crop residues across the two agro-ecologies. Rivers and spring water were the main water source for sheep in the study area. Castration was not common practice by the keepers in the study area. Docking the fat fail of ewe lambs is a common practice in the highland. Farmers in the study area mainly practice natural and uncontrolled mating systems. Selection was practiced both for male and female. Growth rate, appearance and color were the most frequently reported traits in selecting breeding rams across the two agro ecologies. Twining ability, appearance, color and lamb growth were reported as traits given due emphasis in choosing future breeding ewes across the two agro ecologies. Feed shortages, disease, parasite prevalence and market were the major sheep production constraints in Bensa district. There are four towns where sheep was marketed in addition to many villages that were used as primary market outlets for sheep. Farmers, collectors, traders, brokers, restaurant/hotel owners and individual consumers were the major actors in xviii the sheep market. There are five main market channels and three market outflow route of sheep in the study area. The most preferred traits by consumer in the study area were younger age, uncastrated, large frame size, good body condition and non-black color. The demand of sheep was high during the time of crop harvesting and Christian holidays. The main frequently observed coat color pattern of sampled male and female populations of indignous sheep were patchy (51.9%) and while the most observed coat colour type was red followed by mixture of red and brown. Majority of female and male sheep in the study areas had medium and smooth coat cover, and most of female had no horn. In the study area overall mean of ear length, body weight, body length, chest depth, chest girth, height at withers, pelvic width, tail length, tail circumference and scrotumcircumference were 10. 3±0.07cm, 27.6±0.5kg, 60.2 ±0.34cm,23.2±0.08cm,68.5±0.6cm,60.2±0.5cm,17.23±0.54cm,32.73±0.54cm,20.17±0.3cm and 24.93±1.06cm,respectively. Sex of the sheep had significant (P>0.05) effect on the body weight and linear body measurements except ear length, pelvic width and tail length and rump length. Dentition classes of sheep contributed significant differences to body weight and the linear body measurements except ear length. The correlation coefficient between body weight and other linear body measurements were positive and significant both for male and female sheep. The result of the multiple regression analysis showed that chest girth alone could accurately predict body weight both in female and male of sampled population of indigenous sheep with the equation y =-20 + 0.67x for females and y = -29+ 0.8x for males, where y and x are body weight and chest girth, respectively. It was concluded that understanding the production system, consumer preferences and breeding practices of indigenous sheep can be used as first step in designing a sustainable breeding programme in the study area.Ethiopia is home for most populous and diversified indigenous sheep breeds/populations in Africa. There are about 14 traditionally recognized sheep populations in Ethiopia, which are classified into nine genetically distinct breeds and 6 breed groups (Solomon, 2008). The country has about 26 million heads of sheep, of which about 75% is found in the highlands where mixed crop-livestock production systems dominate, while the remaining 25% is found in the lowlands (DAGRIS, 2006;CSA, 2013). In Ethiopia sheep are widely distributed across the diverse agro-climate prevalent in the country. Sheep production in Ethiopia is based on indigenous breeds which account for about 99.78% of the total national sheep population (CSA, 2014).Sheep production is a major component of livestock farming in Ethiopia. It contributes close to 30% of the total ruminant livestock meat output and 14% of the total domestic meat production (Workneh et al., 2004). The sheep enterprise in the Ethiopian highland, where crop and livestock production are integrated, it is the most important form of investment and cash income and provides social security in bad crop years. The livestock sector contributes 30 to 35% of the Ethiopian agriculture GDP, 19% of the total GDP and more than 85% of farm cash income (Benin et al., 2002). Small ruminants account for about 40% of the cash income earned by farm households, 19% of the total value of subsistence food derived from all livestock production, and 25% of total domestic meat consumption (Adane and Girma, 2008).The level of production and productivity of sheep in the country is generally extremely low, due to several technical (genotype, feeding and animal health), institutional, environmental and infrastructural constraints (Markos, 2006). For instance, the average annual off-take rate and carcass weight per slaughtered animal for the years 2000 to 2007 were about 32.5% and 10kg, respectively, the lowest even among Sub-Saharan African countries (FAO,2009). But indigenous sheep breed has a great potential to contribute more to the livelihood of people in low input, smallholder and pastoral production system.The dominant sheep production system in Ethiopia is traditional and subsistence. So far, only very limited efforts have been exerted to promote market-oriented sheep production in the country and hence the current income generating capacity of the sector is not at all justifiable.Production system approach, which involves designing an effective and informed breeding programme, is a necessity to bring about improvements sheep production system of the sector. This approach entails proper valuation of both traded and non-traded products and services generated from the system. Information on the economic value of populations, traits and processes would ease the management of animal genetic resources that requires many decisions (Scarpa et al., 2003). Proper identification and valuation of the different characteristics of the production systems and animals would make resource allocation decisions among the different livestock improvement interventions for commercialization of the system quite fast and smooth (Kassie, 2007). This will also enable identification of sheep market opportunities by identifying preferred traits of sheep by the market in general and local consumers in particular.Sheep genetic improvement programs in developing countries have not been very successful may be due to failure to perceive the multidirectional aspect of the problem such as implementing genetic improvement programs without taking into consideration other vital needs of the farmers (Sölkner et al., 1998;Kosgey et al., 2006). In addition, poor performance of imported breeds from the temperate regions to tropical region with sub optimal management conditions has created a negative image for genetic improvement programs (Workneh et al., 2003). Further, crossbreeds such as Blue du Maine X Menz, Rambouillet X Menz, Romney X Menz, Corriedale X Menzand Hampshire X Menz produced at different research stations and ranches in Ethiopia were rejected by smallholders upon distribution because of phenotypic unlikeness and other characters to the indigenous ones (Markos, 2006).Other authors (Workneh et al., 2003;Kosgey et al., 2006) explained the failure of crossbreeding in the tropics due to incompatibility of the genotypes with the breeding objectives and management approaches in low-input and low-output production systems.Community-based breeding programs that adopt to take into account the farmers' needs, views, decisions, and active participation, from inception through implementation, and their success is based upon proper consideration of farmers' breeding objectives, infrastructure and ownership (Sölkner et al., 1998).Characterization of animal genetic resources encompasses all activities associated with the identification, quantitative, and qualitative description, and documentation of breed populations and the natural habitats and production systems to which they are adapted on. The aim is to obtain better knowledge of Animal Genetic Resources (AnGR), to their present and potential future uses for food and agriculture in defined environments, and their current state as distinct breed populations (FAO, 2007). Genetic and phenotypic characterization of locally available farm animal populations provides essential information to make rational decisions for the improvement and the development of effective breeding programmes. In developing regions, there exist types of farm animal species which owe their distinct identity to a combination of traditional 'breeding objectives' and geographical and/or cultural separation by communities which own them (Mwachero and Rege, 2002). But extensive characterization activity was not undertaken in some part of the country. The importance of small ruminants to the socioeconomic well being of people in developing countries in the tropics in terms of nutrition, income and intangible benefits (i.e., savings, an insurance against emergencies, cultural and ceremonial purposes) cannot be overemphasized.Small ruminants also play a complementary role to other livestock in the utilization of available feed resources and provide one of the practical means of using vast areas of natural grassland in regions where crop production is impractical (Markos et al., 2006). Small ruminants are not only advantageous for human being during periods of cyclical and unpredictable food shortages but they are also useful for balancing the energy and protein supply during normal variations occurring over the years as well as between different seasons.Indigenous sheep in Ethiopia have a multipurpose role for smallholder farmers as sources of income, meat, skin, manure and coarse wool or long hairy fleece. They are also a means of risk avoidance during crop failure. Thus, increasing the current level of productivity of sheep is essential to meet the demands of the ever-increasing human population. On the other hand, by improving the productivity of sheep, export earnings as well as the income of the household will be improved. There are however, a number of constraints that affect the productivity of sheep such as mortality, feed scarcity and inadequate indigenous breed utilizations to production. Various scholars from different corners of the world have been advising that the performance of indigenous sheep could be improved through management and there is also potential for genetic improvement through selection.In all regions, small ruminant contribute significantly to food production and economic output. About 31-38% and 21-33% of the Ethiopian smallholder farmers own sheep and goat (Asfaw and Jabbar, 2008), The livestock sector contributes 30% to 35% of the Ethiopian agriculture GDP, 19% of the total GDP and more than 85% of farm cash income (Benin et al.,2002). Small ruminants account for about 40% of the cash income earned by farm households, 19% of the total value of subsistence food derived from all livestock production, and 25% of total domestic meat consumption (Adane and Girma, 2008). The demand and prices for sheep are also increasing locally due to increased urbanization and increased income in the cities. The demand is especially pressing given that the current population of the country is expected to rise to about 129 million by the year 2030 (IBC, 2004).The domestic sheep is one member of the genus Ovis, and is thought to be descended from the wild mouflon of South-West Asia. Sheep (Ovis aries) are quadruped ruminant mammals typically kept as livestock. Like all ruminants, sheep are members of the order Artiodactyla, the even-toed ungulates. Although the name \"sheep\" applies to many species in the genus Ovis, in everyday usage it almost always refers to Ovis aries. Sheep, Ovis aries, (Mammalia, Artiodactyla, Bovidae, Caprinae) are a highly versatile and adaptable species. From their domestication in the Fertile Crescent, approximately 11,000 years ago, sheep now span the diverse terrains of each inhabited continent where they are exploited for a variety of uses including the production of food (milk, fat, meat) and clothing (skin, wool) (Dwyer,2008).African sheep are thought to be of Near-Eastern origin (Epstein 1954(Epstein , 1971;;Ryder, 1984).The earliest sheep in Africa were thin-tailed and hairy and introduced to East Africa through North Africa. The second wave of sheep introduction to Africa included fat-tailed sheep entering North Africa via the Isthmus of Suez straits and East Africa via straits of Bab-el-Mandeb (Ryder 1984). Fat-rumped sheep entered East Africa much later (Epstein 1954(Epstein , 1971;;Ryder, 1984).Accordingly, African sheep have been traditionally described and classified based on their tail type (Epstein, 1971;Ryder, 1984). However, the relationship between the traditional classification and genetic variation across currently recognized breeds are unknown. Recently, the study by Solomon (2008) indicated that Ethiopian sheep are classified in to 6 major breed groups and breeds.Ethiopia is believed to be one of the major gateways for domestic sheep migration from Asia to Africa (Devendra and McLeroy, 1982). Ethiopia is a home of most populous and diversified indigenous sheep breeds. Ethiopian sheep breeds have been traditionally classified into four broad categories based on tail type and fiber type: the hairy thin tailed, woolen thin tailed, fat tailed and fat rumped (MoA, 1975). Accordingly, attempts have been made to group some of the indigenous sheep types in to these different categories. Previous studies on Ethiopian sheep limited only on few specific sheep types in the country such as such as Horro, Menz, Afar and Bonga and/or are based on few animals (Galal,1983;Kassahun, 2000;Solomon,2002;Sisay,2002;Zewdu et al., 2010;Getachew et al.,2010;). Morphologically characterized sheep types in Gamogofa, Sidama-Gedeo, Gurage -Silte, Kembata Tembaro -Hadya and Wolaita zones and very few woredas of SNNPR were undertaken (Abera et al., 2013). Molecular characterization of 14 sheep types was also studied by Solomon (2008).However, information on sheep types in some pocket areas of Southern Nation Nationalities and Peoples Region is lacking. The choice of farmers/pastoralists of agricultural enterprises in Ethiopia depends on the production environment (availability of resources, particularly land, water and climate), longstanding tradition of agricultural production in the community, socio-economic circumstances (awareness and skill, access to inputs and markets), and government support (inputs and services) which stems from agricultural policies. In subsistence-oriented traditional production system, goats and sheep are important because they require low initial capital and maintenance costs, are able to use marginal land and crop residues, produce milk and meat in readily usable quantities, and are easily cared for by most family members. Furthermore, they are important in feeding the rapidly expanding population of the developing world under typical harsh environmental conditions (Markos et al., 2006).Ethiopia is one of the countries that have predominantly traditional sheep production system.The major sheep production systems in Ethiopia include the traditional sheep production system, which consists mixed crop-livestock systems, and pastoral and agro-pastoral system and the government ranches for breeding and multiplication centers, characterized by different production goals and priorities, management strategies and practices, and constraints (Markos, 2006).The sheep production systems of Ethiopia are classified into five based on degree of integration with crop production and contribution to livelihood, level of input and intensity of production, agro-ecology, length of growing period and relation to land and type of commodity to be produced (Solomon et al., 2008).This production system prevails in the high altitude areas (above 3000 m.a.s.l.) where the major crops grown are barley and pulses such as faba beans, lentils, etc. Sheep are the dominant livestock species. The main feed resource-base includes wasteland grazing, stubble and sometimes straw. Sheep flock sizes range from 30 to several hundred head. Although sheep are reared mainly for meat but skins and coarse wool production for the cottage industry of the central highlands are subsidiary products (Solomon et al., 2008).This system is predominantly found in highland agro-ecological zones where the climatic factors are conducive for farming of crops and raising livestock. This system is generally found in areas where the altitude ranges between 1500 and 3000 m.a.s.l. The area has adequate rainfall and moderate temperature and is thus suitable for grain production. In this production system, livestock and crops are maintained as complementary enterprises. The average land size per household is often less than two hectares (Solomon et al., 2008). Within the mixed crop-livestock system, small ruminant production systems are found associated with the different agricultural production systems which vary in potentials, intensity of the mixed farming operation, natural resources base including grazing and livestock resources.Furthermore, in highland agro-ecology, as in central Ethiopia, increased human population has led to decreased farm size and a gradual shift from keeping large to small ruminants, mainly goat and sheep (Peacock, 2005).Pastoral and agro-pastoral systems are found in the lowlands are characterized by extensive production based largely on the rangeland (Tembely, 1998;EARO, 2000). Small ruminant production is associated with the purely livestock based nomadic and transhumance pastoral production systems based largely on range, primarily using natural vegetation. In the lowlands of Ethiopia, livestock is comprised of large flocks and herds of sheep and goats, cattle and camels mainly transhumant's, where only surplus are sold at local markets or trekked to major consumption centers. Extensive livestock keeping is the backbone of the economies of the lowlands (Tembely, 1998;EARO, 2000).Ranching system is a range-based system of livestock production similar to the pastoral systems but with different production parameters, livestock functions and management. The system can be considered as a modern land use system. The main function of this system is to generate cash income. Both highland and arid/semi-arid ranching can be undertaken in Ethiopia (Solomon et al., 2008).Urban and peri-urban production systems involve the production of sheep and goats within and at the periphery of cities. In this system the feed resource of livestock are usually household wastes, market area wastes, mill leftovers, by-products and roadside grazing.Currently, small-scale sheep and goat fattening is emerging as an economic activity in many growing cities (Solomon et al., 2008).Flock structure or flock composition is the proportion of the flock which is formed by different age and sex classes. This is determined by flock owner on the basis of economic and management considerations. The composition is also influenced by reproductive and mortality rates. Determination of the best flock structure is strongly influenced by the owner's management objectives, whether the main interest is in the production of milk or meat, the prevailing constraints in the system and it can further provide the basis for calculating or for casting flock productivity (ILCA, 1990). For example, in Konta special Woreda of SNNPR sheep flock consisted of breeding ewes, castrates, ram lambs, rams, ewe lambs, ewes, breeding rams account for about 20.2, 18.6, 16 13.1, 12.1,10.4 and 9.3% respectively (Amelmal, 2011) of the flock while On the other hand, average flock sizes of 24 animals were reported in the central highlands of Ethiopia (Abebe, 1999). Lower flock sizes of 6.3 for Horro sheep (Solomon et al., 2005) and 6.97 for sheep breed found around Dire Dawa (Aden, 2003) were reported.Under farmers management condition both breeding ram and ewe graze together throughout the year with all age class of sheep and in most cases with other species of livestock (Abebe, 1999;Aden, 2003). Report on male to female ratio of different studies range from 1:5.21 to 1:29 (Niftalem, 1990;Abebe, 1999;Aden, 2003;Solomon, 2007;Tesfaye, 2008;Dejen, 2010).Animal genetic resources for food and agriculture are an essential component of the biological basis for world food security. Characterization of animal genetic resources refers to the process by which populations or ecotypes are identified or differentiated. Characterization means the distillation of all available knowledge, both published and unpublished, which contributes to the reliable prediction of genetic performance in a defined environment. It does not imply mere accumulation of existing reports or individual findings on genetic performance (Rege and Lipner, 1992). The exercise includes a clear definition of the genetic attributes of an animal species or breed, which has a unique genetic identity, and the environments to which species or breed populations are adapted or known to be partially or not adapted.Characterization activities should contribute to objective and reliable prediction of animal performance in defined environments, so as to allow a comparison of potential performance within the various major production systems found in a country or region. It is, therefore, more than the mere accumulation of existing reports. The information provided through the characterization process enables a range of interest groups, including farmers, national governments and regional as well as global bodies to make informed decisions on priorities for the management of AnGR Characterization of a livestock breed or population should be done both at the phenotypic (phenotypic characterization) as well as molecular level (genetic characterization). Both are complementary to each other. Phenotypic and molecular genetic characterizations of AnGR are used to measure and describe genetic diversity in these resources as a basis for understanding them and utilizing them sustainably.The term \"phenotypic characterization of AnGR\" generally refers to the process of identifying distinct breed/ population and describing their external and production characteristics within agiven production environment. The information generated by characterization studies is essential for planning the management of AnGR at local, national, regional and global levels (FAO, 2012). The Global Plan of Action for Animal Genetic Resources (FAO, 2007) recognizes that \"a good understanding of breed characteristics is necessary to guide decisionmaking in livestock development and breeding programs\".Reproduction is the process by which animals produce offspring for the purpose of continuing the species. It is a series of events comprising of gamete production, fertilization, and increase with age of ewe up to six years, and is greater for seasonally breeding ewes in the first half of the breeding season (Hafez, 1974) It is also affected by age (parity), season and to a large extent ewe body weight at mating which itself modulated by nutrition. Parity had a significant effect on litter size. Litter size increases with increase age of the dam up to about five years or fourth parity, and decreases slightly thereafter (Wilson and Durkin, 1984). The growth performance of sheep is also influenced by age of the dam/parity, pre-mating weight of the dam, type of birth, sex, the season and month of birth. Birth weight is an indicator of the size and vigor of the lamb at the beginning of postnatal development and an important factor influencing later growth. Birth weight which itself is affected by dam size, dam body condition and litter size influences the survival rate and pre-weaning growth performance of the off springs. Birth type and sex are sources of variation in lamb preweaning growth rate .Lambs which are heavier at birth are usually singles or are those produced by ewes with larger body sizes and good feeding conditions. The indication is that lambs heavier at birth have larger adult weight and higher growth capacity (Kassahun, 2000).Weaning weight is a trait of great economic importance in meat sheep production since it has influence on growth rate and survival. Weaning weight and post-weaning growth rate of lambs is as important as the pre-weaning growth performances, mainly when the objective is producing meat through lamb production. Weaning weight influenced by season of birth, sex of lamb and type of birth (Kassahun, 2000;Gbangboche et al., 2006); ram lambs and singleborn ones were heavier than their counterparts. Parity and postpartum ewe body weight had significantly influenced weaning weight; dams with higher parity and heavier postpartum weight produced heavier lambs at weaning (Gbangboche et al., 2006).Communities are defined as groups of people bound together by social, cultural and economic relations based on shared interests and living in a well defined area. Communities are not homogeneous; there may be differences between sub-groups (e.g. families) and individuals in a community. However, shared interests in cooperation outweigh competing interests that serve as the glue linking members together. A community-based breeding program refers to village-based breeding activities planned, designed, and implemented by smallholder farmers, individually or cooperatively, to effect genetic improvement in their flocks and conserve indigenous genetic resources. The community-based breeding strategies also consider the production system holistically and involve the local community at every stage, from planning to operation of the breeding program ( Sölkner-Rollefson, 2003).Community-based breeding programs are most appropriate to implement in situations where livestock keepers already run their animals together, such as in communal grazing areas (Solomon et al., 2010;Solomon et al., 2011). These situations also have potential for other community-level collective actions, such as joint procurement of services (veterinary, feeding and marketing). Programs that adopt community-based strategies need to take into account farmers' needs, views, decisions, and active participation, from inception through to implementation, and their success is based upon proper consideration of farmers' breeding objectives, infrastructure, participation, and ownership (Sölkner et al., 1998). Thus, a full understanding of local knowledge and practices of communities in animal management is of paramount importance for the design and implementation of such programs. Indigenous knowledge is closely related to survival and subsistence and provides a basis for local-level decision making in natural resource management, food security, human and animal health, education, and various other community-based activities.In the Ethiopia past failures in sheep genetic improvement have led to research on design of breeding programs. Small flock sizes, communal grazing/herding and uncontrolled mating did not favour the implementation of selective breeding/recurrent selection programs within village flocks. The approach adopted initially and implemented for Afar, BHS, Horro and Menz sheep was to generate improved rams in closed, nucleus flocks and to disseminate them to village flocks. The projects generally ended in failure, as most lacked long-term vision and did not involve farmers in the planning (Solomon et al., 2011). These failures led to the argument that such breeding schemes may not be appropriate for smallholder systems in developing sheep industries. A new village-or community-based breeding scheme, which does not involve central nucleus flocks, has thus been adopted recently to improve village flocks through recurrent selection (Solomon et al., 2009;Gemeda, 2011;Tadele, 2011). Indigenous knowledge is the body of knowledge acquired by a community in any given area and relating to agriculture, livestock rearing, food preparation, education, institutional management, natural resource management, health care and other pertinent subjects. It is regarded as a valuable resource for development activities that may be equal or even superior to the knowledge introduced by outsiders and should therefore be considered and applied in development projects wherever suitable\" (Mathias, 1995). It is variously referred to as \"traditional knowledge\" or \"local knowledge\". Much indigenous knowledge is based on practical experience and is not easily expressed verbally -it represents \"tacit knowledge\", to distinguish it from \"explicit knowledge\". This knowledge is not evenly distributed. One culture or community has different knowledge from another.Indigenous knowledge of animal breeding is made up of various concepts and practices used by livestock breeders to influence the genetic composition of their herds. It includes:➢ Cultural concepts on the uses of animals (general breeding objectives)➢ Local preferences for certain characteristics, such as colour, size, behavioral patterns and disease or drought resistance (specific breeding objectives)➢ Selection practices for certain qualities (castration, culling, offspring testing)➢ Pedigree-keeping ➢ Social restrictions on the sale of genetically valuable breeding animals that lead to closed gene-pools.Nowadays, small ruminant improvement programmes are being promoted under the smallholder farmers to enhance meat supply. However, there is difficulty in animal marketing in relation to price setting. The market price is usually set by subjective measurements (i.e.visual judgment and loin-eye-area palpation). Estimating the market price based on live weight is quite important in reducing the bargaining practices. Due to lack of weighing scale in the remote rural areas of the region, it is almost impossible to obtain any accurate measurement of this very important trait. Estimating the live weight of small ruminants is quite important for good animal management, including understanding medication doses, adjusting feed supply, monitoring growth and choosing replacement males and females (Mathieu et al., 2011).Body measurements are considered as qualitative growth indicators which reflect the conformational changes occurring during the life span of animals. Studies indicated that variation exists indigenous sheep breeds for body weight traits (Kassahun, 2000;Sisay;2002;Markos, 2006;Solomon;2007). According to Attach and Elkhidir (2004) Sheep marketing operations are generally small-scale family businesses. The sheep producers supply to the market is not based on market demand, rather buyers must choose from whatever is available in the market. The live animals are either transported in trucks or herded over long distances to feedlot operators, export abattoirs, or major markets. These final market destinations are far away from supply sources, and the transportation costs associated with getting live animals to markets can result in significant weight loss and even death; stock routes are characterized by lack of adequate feed, water, and resting places. Price is determined through bargaining at the market; sheep producers are usually less informed about price, supply, and demand situations. Producers are highly fragmented, while there is a concentration of major sheep buyers, a situation which might lead to noncompetitive pricing and marketing behavior (CSA, 2005).There is a need for a well performing marketing system which satisfies consumer demands with the minimum margin between consumer and producer prices. Higher prices for producers can encourage farmers to adopt new technologies which, though potentially more profitable, may pose greater risk than traditional production system (Belay, 2013).The marketing channels flow to final consumers in both the domestic and export markets are lengthy, without significant value-added activities. The sheep marketing channels, which start with the smallholder livestock producers from the mixed crop-livestock farming system, mainly cater to the domestic market. The marketing channel starting with the pastoralists is for both domestic and export markets. The market actors may be involved in cattle only, sheep and goats only, or cattle, sheep, and goat transactions (Fekadu, 2006).Economic valuation of phenotypic traits starts from elicitation of the preferences of consumers of the livestock raised or bought from the market. Reorientation of livestock production systems towards consumer preferences and demands through timely and comprehensive transformation is currently the main agenda among the stakeholders of livestock improvement. Market orientation of livestock production system requires proper valuation of both traded and non-traded products and services generated from the system. This is why eliciting farmers' preferences of the phenotypic characteristics of livestock and estimating the economic values of these characteristics become crucially important. Proper identification and valuation of the different characteristics would make resource allocation decisions among the different livestock improvement interventions for commercialization of the system quite fast and easy. The research was justified for the basic reason that prices of animals are determined mainly based on phenotypic and qualitative traits than quantitative traits such as live weight or carcass weight as commonly practiced in developed markets (Girma et al., 2007).However, information on the different types of criteria used for marketing sheep, and whether these market criteria have significant association with the buying price and purpose for which they are assessed is lacking. Such information provides first hand idea for sheep breeders so as to improve production according to market demand.This study was conducted in Bensa district of Sidama Zone in Southern Nations Nationalities The agricultural production system of Bensa district is mainly characterized by mixed crop livestock system. The most important staple food crops grown by the farmers in the area are enset (Enset ventricosum), maize and haricot bean. Enset is the major stable food source for human and its by products serve as an important source of animal feed in the study area. The main crops grown during the long rainy season are barely, wheat, vegetables and pulses which are grown exclusively in highland and mid-altitude areas. Perennials crops are cash crops which include coffee and fruit trees (Avocado). Among cash crops coffee is the most important source of income. Livestock production is one of the major economic bases of the study area. Sheep production has always been an integral part of the traditional subsistence mixed crop-livestock production system in this area. For consumer preference study, discussion was held with district marketing and cooperative promotion office of study area. Accordingly, all possible markets and primary, secondary and tertiary market of the study district were identified. Accordingly, Gonjobe, Bura, Chebe and Daye markets were identified as the major markets in the study area. After identification of potential markets, producers and traders (small and large) and consumers (butchers, hotels, and restaurants) were selected and discussion was held on consumer's preference of indigenous sheep of the study area.For morphological characterization study both qualitative and quantitative traits of indigenous sheep were measured. Measurements were made on individual animals from 446 randomly selected females and 128 randomly selected males in the study area. Every Animal to be measured was identified by sex and dentition. Morphological measurements were taken from each individual animal (0PPI to 3PPI) that were available in sampled sheep population in study area. All sampled sheep were individually handled and dentition characters were used to determine the age correlated in each case by owner's information.Data were collected by administrating a semi-structured questionnaire, individual interview employing field measurement and observations, through organized group discussion and from secondary sources. Rapid market appraisal (RMA) as outlined by Holtzman (2002) was employed to study the consumer preferences and marketing systems of sheep in the district. Local traders, terminal traders, hotel/ restaurant owners and consumers were interviewed using respective checklists.The checklists included meat consumption level and pattern of consumers, phenotypic trait they prefer to buy sheep from market, limitation of meat consumption trends of consumers, factors influencing consumers' choice of meat. All possible to and from sheep market chains in Bensa district were identified.Quantitative (body measurements) and qualitative (morphological characters) data were collected based on age groups and recorded on the format adopted from the standard description list developed by FAO (2012) Wilson and Durkin (1984) for African sheep breed. Body condition score (BCS) was assessed subjectively and scored using the 5 point scale (1= very thin, 2 = thin, 3= average, 4 = fat and 5 = Very fat/ obese) for both of the sexes according to Hassamo et al. (1986). Linear body measurements were taken by restraining and holding the animals in a stable condition.The data collected was checked for any inconsistency and corrected, and then coded and entered into computer. The collected data that is morphological and qualitative data were entered into Microsoft EXCEL software's. Survey data was described and analyzed using SPSS (2009). Indices were calculated to provide ranking of the reasons of keeping sheep, importance of major farming activities to the family food source and income, selection criteria, and major constraints of sheep production according to the following formula: Index = Σ of [3 for rank 1 + 2 for rank 2 + 1 for rank 3] given for particular qualitative variables divided by Σ of [3 for rank 1 + 2 for rank 2 + 1 for rank 3] for all qualitative variables considered.Effective population size for randomly mated population was calculated according to Falconer and Mackay (1996) as: Ne = (4Nm Nf) / (Nm + Nf) Where, Ne = effective population size, Nm = number of breeding males and Nf =number of breeding females. The rate of inbreeding coefficient (ΔF) was calculated from Ne as ΔF = 1/2Ne. The mean of these parameters was also computed.Qualitative data from individual observation was analyzed following the frequency procedures of SAS version 9. 1.3(2008). The General Linear Model (GLM) procedure of SAS was employed to analyze quantitative variables to determine effects of class variables (sex and dentition). Sex and age group were fitted as fixed independent variables and body weight and a linear body measurement except scrotum circumference was fitted as dependent variables. Tukey's test was used to separate means when significant difference was detected.The models for analyzing quantitative data except scrotal circumference were: yijk =  + Ai+ Sj+(AS)ij+ eijkWhere: Yijk = the observed k (body weight or linear body measurements except scrotum circumference) in the i th age group and j th sex = overall mean Ai = the effect of i th age group (0-3 pair permanent incisor) Sj= the effect of j th sex (j= male or female) (AS)ij = the effect of interaction of i of age group with j of sex eijk = random residual error Model to analyze the scrotum circumference was:Where: Yij = the observed j (scrotum circumference) in the i th age group = overall mean Ai = the effect of i th age group (0-3pair permanent incisor) eij = random residual error Multiple linear regressions were used to estimate the body weights of sheep from various body measurements. The association between body weight and linear measurements were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient in SAS version 9. 1.3 (2008). The following models were used for estimation of body weight from linear measurements:-For male:Where: Yj = the response variable; body weight  = the intercept X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6 and X7 are the explanatory variables chest girth, body length, height at withers, pelvic width tail length, tail circumference and scrotal circumference, respectively.are partial regression coefficients of the variables 7 X X1,X2,..., ej= the residual random error For female:Where:Yj= the dependent variable body weight Household characteristics of the sampled households are presented in Table 4. The majority (92.95%) of the interviewed households in the study area were male headed. The age of the majority (84.3%) of the respondents fall under 50 year, which is the active age group and are the main source of farm labor. Moreover, about 94.5% of the interviewed households were married.The educational status of the respondents in the present study was 33. 6, 25.75, and 22.7, and 18.2% for primary attendants, illiterate, read and write and secondary attendants, respectively.In contrast to this report, higher proportions of illiterate and primary attendants (33.55% and 54.75%) lower level of read and write and secondary attendants (8.35% and 3.35) were reported in southern Ethiopia (Dejene, 2010). This survey result indicates that the higher proportion of farmers having primary educational background would be an opportunity to utilize them in keeping simple records which are of paramount importance in decision making and easy to implement community based breeding program in the study area .The average family size of the households was 7.8±0.39 (ranging from 2-14), which is closer to 8.5 reported for the same district previously (Yoseph et al., 2015). However, the present family size was higher than Benchi Maji and Keffa Zone of southern Ethiopia (6.7±3) (Dejen, 2010). The higher family size in the current study indicates the existence of polygamous marriages and lack of awareness on family planning in the area. The average land holding per household in the study area was 2.13 ha. The result was consistent with 2.15 ha reported for the same district previously (Yoseph et al., 2015). The average land holding per household showed a significant difference (p<0.05) between the two agro-ecologies of the study area. Accordingly, landholding was significantly higher (P<0.05)for highland (2.38 ha±0.06) compared to mid-altitude (1.88±0.05) agro-ecology. The reason for small land size in mid-altitude agro ecology was mainly due to conduciveness of the area for cash crop production especially for coffee production. Land holdings range from 1.01 to 2.00 ha for about 30.8% of farmers in the SNNPR and for 33.3% of farmers at the national level (CACC, 2003). 2005). However, it is smaller than the average land holding reported for Metama (6.17ha) (Sisay, 2006) and Bale high lands of Oromia region (Teshome, 2006). The size of land holding is an important factor that determines availability of feed for livestock. Thus, feed resources are more available in highland compared to mid-altitude agro-ecology in the study area. The major farming activities and their contribution as food and income source to the family in the study area are presented in Table 6. Thus, the major source of food as ranked by the sampled households was cattle production followed by crop and sheep farming, while the major source of cash income was both crop and cattle production followed by sheep. Among the crop type enset, maize, coffee, wheat, barley, teff, haricot bean, pea and beans are the major crops used as a source of cash income and household consumption. Among these crops, enset is used as the main source of food for household consumption, source of income and for livestock feed across both agro ecology of the study area. On the other hand, maize and haricot bean were the major crops used for income and household consumption in midaltitude agro ecology while barley and wheat were the major crops used for income and household consumption in highland agro ecology. Coffee is an important source of cash particularly in the mid-altitude agro ecology while bean, peas, cabbage and onion were used as additional source of income in highland agro ecology. Index= sum of (3 X number of household ranked first + 2 X number of household ranked second + 1 X number of household ranked third) given for each variable divided by sum of (3 X number of household ranked first + 2 X number of household ranked second + 1 X number of household ranked third) for all variables.The average livestock holding/household of the study district is presented in Table 7.Respondents in highland had significantly higher number of cattle, sheep and horse holding (p<0.05) than respondents in the mid-altitude. However, they had significantly lower (p<0.05) number of chicken, goat and donkey compared to mid-altitude agro ecology. All the households considered had sheep across the entire study district. This is due to the fact that this study considered only those farmers who had sheep.Sheep was the largest livestock species possessed by the two agro ecology of the study area.The possible reasons that sheep is easy to manage and conducive environment for sheep production in the study area. The population trends of major livestock species for the last ten years in the study area is summarized in Table 8. According to the respondents, the decline in the number of livestock species was the highest for chicken (50%) followed by cattle (39.85%) and sheep (20.7%).The possible reasons reported by the respondents for this trend were frequent occurrence of disease, presence of predators, shortage of feed both in quality and quantity, cultivation of grazing land. According to the information generated during group discussions in the study area, feed shortage and disease are the major causes for the decline in the number of livestock.Similar reasons were reported by Solomon (2007). The possible reasons for an increasing trend of sheep population comparing to other livestock species in the study area might be due to the use of sheep as immediate source of cash income. The present finding was similar to Wossenie (2012) who indicated that the population of livestock was increasing in westHararghe zone of Oromia region. It was related to the availability of grazing land, high demand (increased human population) and attractive price for livestock. The ratio of breeding ram to ewe in the study area was 1:6.24 and 1:7.1 for highland and midaltitude sheep flocks, respectively. This ratio is closer to 1:7.5 reported for for Menz sheep (Abebe, 1999) while it is lower than 1:1.98 reported for Dawuro and Konta sheep (Amelmal, 2011) and 1:5.21 reported for Kaffa and Benchmaji sheep (Dejene, 2010). The male to female ratio of the two agro ecologies of the study area is higher than 1:8. The purposes of sheep keeping in the study area are presented in Table 10. Knowledge of reasons for keeping animals is a prerequisite for deriving operational breeding objectives (Jaitner et al., 2001). The results of this survey revealed that sheep play multi-functional roles in both agro ecologies with similar production goals. The results indicated the relative importance of tangible benefits of sheep keeping (such as regular source of income, saving, and meat). Most farmers in both agro ecologies keep sheep primarily as source of income. In the study area both male and female involved in sheep management interchangeably, except milking which is dominantly undertaken by the female in highland agro ecology (Table11). All activities of sheep management across the study area were done by family labor. The responsibility of purchasing (85.9%), selling (84.4%) and breeding (80.5%) of sheep was dominantly undertaken by head of the household. However, children and women were heavily involved in caring and herding of sheep. The same members of the household feed and protect sheep from bad weathers, predators and theft and assisted during lambing.Therefore, in designing breeding strategies, the role of women and children in sheep production should not be undermined. Similar result was reported from north western lowlands of Amhara region (Solomon, 2007). The quality and quantity of feed resources available for animals primarily depends upon the climatic and seasonal factors (Zewdu, 2008). who reported for Metema district of Amhara region, around Dire Dawa, Dawuro Zone and Konta Special Woreda of SNNPR, respectively. However, the major feed resources during the dry season across the two agro-ecologies were crop residues followed by natural pasture.Enset leaf and stem, and bamboo leaf are also important feed resources used to complement feed supply particularly during the dry season when the availability of forage is low. In study area, during wet season the important feed recourses were natural pasture, crop residues and fallow land.The major crop residues in highland agro ecology include barely, wheat, bean and peas straws while in mid-altitude it includes maize stover, wheat, haricot bean, and teff straws. The difference in type of crop residues availability between the two agro-climates is due to difference in agro-climatic requirements of the different crops. There are different methods of grazing practiced by sheep producers in the study area (Table 13). In fact, the different types of grazing methods depend on season. Thus, during the wet season, majority (about 71.9%) of the respondents use tethering grazing in order to prevent sheep from grazing cultivated annual food crops. According to focus group discussants, the main reasons for tethering apart from preventing crop damage, was for optimal usage of family labor, protect from predators and unwanted breeding. During the dry season, majority of the respondents (59.5%) practice free grazing, followed by rotational grazing (23.4%) and tethered grazing (10.9%) and herded (6.2%) in highland agro-climate. The majority of farmers in highland (71.9%) and mid-altitude (78.1%) do not fatten sheep (Table 15). The finding of the current study is less than 89.5% reported for Adiya kaka but higher than 53.3% reported for Horro sheep (Zewdu, 2008). The difference might be due to lack of awareness on value addition through fattening and seasonality of markets for fattened sheep. Although fattening is less common, the major classes of sheep used for fattening by those who practice fattening in study area were castrate followed by young males and older females. Crop residues, enset leaves, salt, grain and home left over were commonly supplemented for fattening sheep in the study area. According to the respondents, most of the producers didn't consider consumer preferences while fattening sheep in the study area. Table 16 showed that river water was the major water source of sheep in wet and dry seasons in both agro ecologies. The proportion of sheep watered by river water were 78.12 % and 75 % during the dry and wet seasons, respectively, in highland agro-climate while it was 65.62%, and 60.9 % during the wet and dry seasons, respectively, in mid-altitude agro-climate. The distances to watering points varied during the dry and wet seasons. The majority (76.5% for dry and 79.6% for wet seasons) of the respondents water their animals within less than one km distance in highland agro-climate. Similarly majority of the households (62.5% for dry and 59.4% for wet seasons) water their animals at less than 1 km in mid-altitude agro-climate. Similar to this study Workneh and Rownalds (2004) reported that the majority of households (three-fourth) water their animals with less than 1 km in wet season Oromia region. The majority of the respondents water their animals once a day during both the dry and wet seasons both in highland and mid-altitude agro ecologies. In general, water was not a limiting factor for sheep production in the study area.House protects animals from extreme temperature, rain, wind, predators and theft. In the study area different types of houses, housing materials and the common housing systems were identified (Table 17). The majority of the respondent in both agro ecologies house their sheep in the main house together with the family. Separate sheep house with roof was also reported by some farmers across two agro ecologies. The majority of the farmers across the study district house their sheep during the night. About 26.6% and 21.88% of the respondents house their sheep in separate house constructed purposively for sheep in highland and mid-altitude agro ecologies, respectively. The results indicated that 85.9 and 90.6 % of the households used grasses or bushes for construction of roof while the remaining 14.1% and 9.4% used corrugated iron sheet. Similar to this study, Workneh and Rownalds ( 2004) indicated that 60% of the households used family house for housing their sheep in crop livestock system of Oromia region. The majority of respondents house their sheep together with cattle while 3.1% of house separately.Table 17. Reported housing of sheep in the study areaDiseases have numerous negative impacts on productivity of herds i.e. death of animals, loss of weight, slow down growth, poor fertility performance, decrease in physical power etc.(CSA, 2012). Gatenby (1986) also stated that maximum productivity in a given system of production is obtained when disease control is optimal. Healthy sheep with normal physiological function and structure that enable the sheep to attain highest production is vital.Farmers in the study area do not exactly know the type of disease which causes mortality but they were able to describe the symptoms. According to the livestock and fishery office of Bensa district, the major types of diseases and parasites of sheep which frequently occurred in the study area are presented in Sheep milk consumption was common in highland agro ecology of the study area. Producers in the study area milk their sheep for different purposes where priority was given to the lambs.Lambs were allowed to suck their ewes freely for about a week to ensure survival of the lamb after birth. When the Lambs were in a good growth (after about a month) and supplemented with feed, farmers start to take out some amount of milk for consumption, mainly for coffee whitening, children and old people (mixed with coffee). According to FG discussants some farmers prefer sheep milk for butter making due to the perceived higher fat content. Sheep milk contains higher fat (6.8 to 8.5%) compared to goat (3.4 to 4.5), cattle (3.4 to 5.5) and camel (5.0 to 5.5) (Degen, 2007). According to the FG discussants sheep milk was not marketed in the area mainly because of cultural reasons. Thus the producers were reluctant to disclose that they milk sheep though they consume the milk at home. Frequency of milking and milk yield per day per ewe were different in the rainy and dry seasons due to feed scarcity in the dry season (Tesfaye, 2008). Sheep milking was not practiced in mid-altitude agro ecology of the study area. Note: Though the lactation continues up to the period of suckling by the lamb but the lactation length was recorded as the number of days up to which sheep were hand milked.Weaning is a crucial period which influence both dam and lamb productivity. In the study area, lambs wean naturally without shepherd intervention. The overall reported average weaning ages for both sexes was 4.4 months. It was a little bit longer than 3-4 months reported for indigenous sheep breeds of Ethiopia (Tembely et al., 1994). Moreover, the present finding was higher than what had been reported for the thin tailed Gumuz sheep (3.95± 0.9 months) (Solomon, 2007).Good reproductive performance is a prerequisite for any successful sheep production program. Reproductive performances of sheep in the study area are presented in Table 21.There was significant (P<0.05) difference was observed between the agro ecologies with respect to reproductive performance of indigenous sheep because of better sheep management practices in the highland than the mid-altitude. The average age at sexual maturity of male sheep in highland was 7+0.12 months while it was 7.15 ±0.2 months in mid-altitude agroclimate. Similarly, an average age of 7.1 months was reported for Afar sheep earlier (Tesfaye, 2008). The average age at sexual maturity of females in highland was 7.68±0.23 months while it was 7.8 ± 0.12 months in mid-altitude.The breeding practices of sheep in the study area presented in Appendix Table 3. The dominant sheep breeding practices in the study area was uncontrolled mating system.Similarly, Workneh and Rownalds ( 2004) reported that 77.3% of the farmers in Oromia region practice uncontrolled mating system. With regard to ram possession of the study area, about 39.1% of the respondents have no breeding ram to breed their breeding ewes. They use rams from neighborhood or borrow males from other areas for mating. Most of the respondent had one ram running with the flock throughout the year. Majorities of the respondents do not give additional feeds for breeding rams. The purpose of keeping rams was for mating purpose (64.1%), for socio cultural (7.7%) and for saving purpose (28.21%). The majority of the males used for breeding purpose were born or originated within the flock (82.05%) and the remaining was purchased and managed privately. This implies that the animals within the flock are very closely related and have narrow relationship which leads to inbreeding (Jaitner et al., 2001). Similar scenario was observed among Menz and Afar sheep breeders (Tesfaye 2008). The majority of the respondents (65.62%) could identify the sire of the new born lamb by relating the color of the lamb with the color of its sire and knowing the sire of a lamb.Although the disadvantage of inbreeding was not clear for farmers in the study area, some of them reported that they heard the negative effect of inbreeding.According to the respondents castration of sheep was not a common practice in the study areas. Some farmers with better wealth status, however, castrate and fatten one to two rams for one year period for home consumption as well as for market. The method of castration is traditional through repeatedly crushing the spermatic cord using a smooth river-stone and wood. Although the age of the animals at time of castration is not fixed, farmers suggested that it should be after eruption of one pair of permanent teeth. This is because farmers believe that the rams will mature and finishes growth at this age. The scheme should introduce and emphasize on awareness creation of castration of the inferior rams/unselected/ for fattening purpose and select superior rams with better management to be parents/sires of the next generation.Docking of female sheep was a common practice undertaken by sheep producers in highland agro ecology of the study area. Accordingly, about 60.94% of the respondents practice docking in the highland while in mid-altitude docking was not common (Appendix Table 3).The major reason for docking female sheep was that it facilitates mating easily. Moreover, the focus group discussants reported that docking females improves body weight and condition, appearance, ease hygiene during delivery and widening the tail. Unlike females, males were not docked since docked males are not preferred at the market. Even though there is no standardized specific age and site of tail cutting in female sheep, most producers during the focus group discussion estimated that it is about 5cm from the tip of the tail based on the body condition of the ewe lambs.The effective population size (Ne) and the rate of inbreeding (ΔF) calculated for sheep flocks in the study area are presented in Table 22. High level of inbreeding and decreased genetic diversity may be the result of the utilization of breeding rams born with in the flock, uncontrolled mating, and lack of awareness about inbreeding and small flock's size (Falconer and Mackay, 1996;Kosgey, 2004). Effective population size is a measure of genetic variability within a population with large values of Ne indicates more variability and small values indicate less genetic variability (Maiwashe et al., 2006). In this study, the estimate of Ne was 97.68 when a household flock is herded alone. Under random mating when the sheep flock of a household was not mixing, the rate of inbreeding was 0.005. This value is lower than the report of Amelmal (2011) for Tocha (0.17), Mareka (0.2) and Konta sheep (0.18).Tesfaye ( 2008) also reported 0.079 and 0.2 for Menz and Afar sheep respectively, when sheep flocks were not mixed, which is higher than the present study. Rate of inbreeding in the study area is maximum acceptable level (0.063) (Armstrong , 2006) which is due to small effective population size, lower proportion of breeding ram and uncontrolled mating practiced in the study area. The small effective population size and lower proportion of breeding ram in the study area is due to absence of mixing various flocks from different households. Study (Tesfaye, 2008) indicated that mixing of flocks was reported to reduce ΔF by a range of 86% to 78%. Knowing the potential of local sheep population and trait preferences are useful to make better informed decisions in developing interventions to improve the contribution of sheep to livelihoods of their keepers (Tassaw, 2010). In the study area appearance/size, coat color, character, meat quality, growth rate, fertility, disease tolerance and tail type were among the reported preferred traits in both agro ecologies. In highland appearance/size (index= 0.29), coat color (index= 0.19), fast growth rate (index= 0.18) and meat quality (index=0.12) were among the reported preferred traits in their order of importance by the respondents (Table 23) while in mid-altitude fast growth rate (index= 0.25), appearance/size (index= 0.21), coat color (index= 0.17) ,tail type (index= 0.12) and fertility (index= 0.12) were among the traits considered for improvement intervention. The most preferred color was red, light red and white with white patch and white respectively, while unwanted color was black because of lower market value. Similarly Zewdu (2008) indicted that traits like body appearance and coat color were the most considered characters in Adiyo Kaka and Horro rams. Index= sum of (3 X number of household ranked first + 2 X number of household ranked second + 1 X number of household ranked third) given for each variable divided by sum of (3 X number of household ranked first + 2 X number of household ranked second + 1 X number of household ranked third) for all variables.In both agro ecologies, FG discussants and key informants reported that the tendencies of farmers to rear their local sheep has become high. According to them, they liked these local sheep type for their large body size, attractive coat color, fast growths, and nice posture. They also mentioned that such type of sheep can fetch high premium price when it has been sold.Due to this reason, it was observed that some farmers practice selective breeding of ram and ewe. The proportions of red /light red and white sheep are increasing and that of black sheep is decreasing over time. This is strongly supported by the preference of farmers to white and red/light red colors against the black color for which the farmers are exercising some kind of selection for the preferred ones. The results indicated that, any sheep breed improvement interventions should take into account the need of the producer trait preferences and the demand markets in the study area.Selection criteria are the characteristics that allow the farmers to achieve the breeding objectives and select replacement animals (Holst, 1999). It is expected that farmers select replacement stocks by considering its own morphological and production characteristics. In general as stated by Tabbaa and Al-Atiyat (2009) livestock producers place more weight on morphological selection criteria (subjective selection) than production selection criteria (objective selection). In the study area selection of breeding rams and ewes were practiced by the farmers, although they don't have specific age of selection. Farmers in the study area select rams/ewes when they need to cull some for market and save the others. Ranking of selection criteria of breeding ram and ewe are presented in Tables 24 and 25. In selecting a breeding ram, fast growth was ranked first in highland while appearance/size conformation was ranked first in mid-altitude agro-climate with an index of 0.32 and 0.35, respectively. In highland, appearance/size and coat color were ranked second, and third high with indices of 0.32 and 0.24 respectively. In mid-altitude fast growth rate, color and tail length were ranked second, third and fourth high with indices 0.25, 0.19 and 0.14 respectively. Index= sum of (3 X number of household ranked first + 2 X number of household ranked second + 1 X number of household ranked third) given for each variable divided by sum of (3 X number of household ranked first + 2 X number of household ranked second + 1 X number of household ranked third) for all variables.In selecting a breeding ewe, twining ability was ranked first both in the highland and midaltitude agro-climate with indexes of 0.35 and 0.37, respectively. In highland, appearance/size, coat color and lamb growth were ranked as second, third and fourth with indices of 0.27,0.23 and 0.11, respectively/ while in mid-altitude appearance/size, coat color and lamb growth were ranked second, third and fourth with indices of 0.25,0.16 and 0.13, respectively. Mothering ability of ewes embraces maternal behavior that allows proper bonding to take place between mother and offspring, as well as nursing behavior, responsiveness and attentiveness towards the lambs, and protection of the lambs from predators (Gemeda, 2011). Index= sum of (3 X number of household ranked first + 2 X number of household ranked second + 1 X number of household ranked third) given for each variable divided by sum of (3 X number of household ranked first + 2 X number of household ranked second + 1 X number of household ranked third) for all variables.Knowledge about ways of acquisition of breeding stock and mode of disposal is important in assessing the breeding practices of sheep owners (Helen et al., 2015). Major modes of flock entry and exit are summarized in Table 26. In the study area, sheep were added on farm through birth, purchase and exchange, of which the contribution of the former (87.55%) was the highest followed by purchase (8.55%). The contribution of exchange as source of animals was very minimal (3.9%). Similarly, birth was reported as the main mode of indigenous sheep flock entry in Horro, Adiya Kaka, and Alaba districts (Tsedeke, 2007;Zewdu, 2008). The highest share of the total exit (70.85%) was accounted for sale, followed by mortality (11.9%) and exchange (10%) while only 7.25 % was reportedly slaughtered. Participatory identification and prioritization of the major constraints of livestock production is the first step to design and implement need based interventions development options.Constraints impending sheep productivity in the study area are presented in Table 27.Although the major constraints limiting sheep breeding were mostly similar, their importance, however, varied across the study areas. This study observed that feed shortage, disease, genotype and market were the major constraints challenging sheep production across both agro ecologies. Feed shortage have been reported by the majority of respondents as common constraint and ranked first. Similar results were reported for Menz and Afar areas (Tesfaye, 2008). The major causes of feed scarcity were shortage of grazing land and expansion of arable farming at the expense of grazing land. Bura sheep market is located at the north eastern tip of the district some 28 km far from Daye.The market is operational on Monday and Thursday. Although this market was fenced, it has poor access for road and transportation. Chebe sheep market is located at about 25km east of the Daye town. The market days are Monday and Thursdays. Similar to Gonjebe, this market place was not fenced and there was no other facility. Generally, the district has poor market infrastructure, which hinders the movement of livestock inputs and outputs.The major reasons of selling sheep as reported by the respondents in the study area are shown in Table 28. Most of the sampled households sell their sheep to purchase farm inputs for crop production (28%) and cover school fee for children (20%). Sheep is often at immediate disposal for several income requirements in the rural households. Producers do not sale large animals and other farm resources for urgent needs because acquiring back them is not easy.Among the household members, husbands are usually responsible for selling sheep.Consistent with other parts of the country, the sheep to be sold were usually trekked from home to the markets. The most important months in which farmers sell their sheep included June (for farm input purchase), July and August (to purchase grain), September (for festival and covering children school fee), December (for Christmas holiday) and April (for Easter holiday). The major actors involved in sheep marketing in the study area included traders, sheep producers, brokers, hotels/restaurants and individual consumers. The number and type of sheep buyers and sellers vary according to the level/stage of markets. Thus, the major buyers at primary market (Bura, Gonjobe and Chebe) were small traders and sheep producers, while at secondary and terminal markets(Daye,Hawassa) the major buyers were trader's, butcheries, restaurants/hotels, individual consumers and institutional users. The major suppliers/sellers of sheep in the primary, secondary and tertiary market were producers, small traders and large traders, respectively. Producers buy sheep mainly for rearing and to a less extent for slaughtering. Thus, they buy young ewes for rearing. The type of sheep purchased for slaughtering depends on the economic status of farmers.The major parameters considered by traders during buying sheep are presented in Table 29.Body conditions and age were ranked as the most important parameters considered by traders for buying sheep. Accordingly, traders opt for sheep with better body condition, intact male and young. On the other hand, restaurants prefer to buy old ewes due to their lower price.Castrated male sheep were required during festivals such as New Year, Easter (Fasika) and Christmas (Gena). Index= sum of (3 X number of household ranked first + 2 X number of household ranked second + 1 X number of household ranked third) given for each variable divided by sum of (3 X number of household ranked first + 2 X number of household ranked second + 1 X number of household ranked third) for all variables.Producers raise sheep and sale any time when cash is needed. According to buyers they purchase sheep for breeding, slaughtering and fattening purposes. They sell the animals after value addition (breeding/fattening) during the holidays or during the period of coffee harvesting times. In addition, collectors buy sheep at primary markets (Gonjobe, Bura, Chebe)and trek to Daye (secondary) and other surrounding markets to sell in a better price.Collectors are found in rural areas and they purchase sheep from primary markets. They were market actors in the study area who buy sheep from the rural markets and supply them to small traders and large traders. There are more collectors than traders (large and small) in the study area. Collectors use either their own capital or large-scale and small-scale trader's money to buy sheep. They may also sell to farmers and individual consumers. Collectors who use traders' money deliver the animals to the same traders on commission basis.Small traders who buy sheep from producers and collectors. They are those who buy sheep from primary markets like Gonjobe, Bura and Chebe and sell them in district town such as Daye or to bigger traders who transport the animals to central markets. Usually they buy and sell small number of animals, not more than 20 in the study area. These traders also use other non-regular market days (gulit) in district town (Daye) to sell their animals.In the context of this study area, big trades are those market agents that can supply about 40 sheep to tertiary and terminal markets which are located in major cities such as Hawassa, Shashemene and Dilla. Big traders also supply sheep to individual consumers, hotels/restaurants and butchers. They share the premium obtained as a result of collecting large numbers of animals with their suppliers. In addition, they provide working capital to their agents (small traders) in order to ensure the supply of adequate number of animals that fetch them premium prices. Traders have quality parameters to be considered when buying sheep. They consider the age of animals, so mostly look for yearlings. Similar market participation was also reported from pastoral areas of Borena (Solomon, 2004).Brokers, locally called Delalas, are also major participants in marketing of sheep in the study area. According to key informants, without the involvement of broker's, they don't sell the animals. The role of brokers in marketing sheep in the area was perceived in different ways.Some people describe them favorably as they facilitate transaction between buyers and sellers while others see them as problem in marketing as they are the ones who mainly decide on the price. The fee they collect is also described by some as exorbitaul and unnecessary as they negotiate the price his/her animal with the buyers/sellers. In agreement with this report, the role of brokers was also described previously ( Endeshaw, 2007;Tsedeke, 2007;Daniel, 2008)There are two groups of consumers in the study area. These are hotels/restaurants and individual consumers. Hotels/restaurant buy sheep either directly from the producers, small traders and/or larger traders, and make local delicacies like Misto, Tibis, Dullet, , Key wot and Kikil. Public servants, traders and farmers are also an important part of actors in the sheep value chain in the study area. They buy sheep directly from traders and from farmers.Preferences for size and type of animals are influenced by individuals' purchasing power and the type of festivity/holiday to be celebrated.In the study area, season was the most important factor influencing the price, supply and demand of sheep. The variability in sales is associated with holiday markets, crop planting and harvesting seasons and drought seasons and years. During major crop harvesting time, cultural and religious holidays the demand for sheep increases and so does the supply by the producers as well as the price of sheep. According to the traders, most of the households in the study area prefer to sale their sheep during the major holiday season. There was also a time where sheep price was high, which was mainly associated with coffee and other crops harvesting time (October to December). Money is available at hands for most people during the coffee producing season in the study area. During this period, producers purchase sheep using the money obtained from the sale of coffee and keep the animals (breed/fatten) to be used at the time of deficit, and for harvesting farm inputs in mid-altitude and highland areas.The supply of sheep increases during the time when farmers need additional farm and household inputs and religious festivals. Such as during the months of June, July and August (Figure 3). During this time, most farmers forced to sell their sheep to fulfill different household needs such as fertilizer, improved seeds, clothing and stationery for schoolchildren, household consumable items etc. Therefore, in most cases sheep are sold for lower prices during this period.According to the producers', traders' and consumer response, demand for sheep varies depending on the season. The demand of sheep was high during times of crop harvesting time, religious and other holidays as well as those times when there is a priority to buy household and consumer goods. Compared to other months, farmers sell their sheep at higher price during the months of April, September, and December and November farmers sold their sheep) at higher prices. In the study area the price of sheep marketing is set by eye ball estimation. It is also accompanied by traditional methods of body condition scoring. There was no weighing or grading of animals for sale in the market. Consequently, it is difficult to estimate the quantity of carcass produced from the animal. This is expected to influence the production and productivity of the animals negatively. The finding was similar with previous works (Ayele et al., 2003;Endeshaw, 2007;Tsedeke, 2007).This study demonstrated that sheep meat is consumed without any taboo in the study area.However, majority (83%) of the sampled households consume sheep meat during the major holidays. Sheep meat is also consumed during occasions such as wedding, birth of child, funerals and during the time of coffee harvest (Figure 6). In the study area sheep is slaughtered in group and divided among group members or slaughtered individually depending upon wealth status and type of occasion. It is not common to purchase sheep meat from butcheries by the households in the study area. According to group discussants, slaughtering sheep at the time of crop harvest, particularly for coffee grown areas, is a common practice in the study area. According to Beneberu (2003) young sheep fetch higher prices. This is true not only for economic purpose but also for its tenderness, softness and the like. This study demonstrated that, respondents preferred meat from male than female animals. The difference could be attributed to variation in mass and sensory test of meat produced from different sexes of livestock (Tsegay, 2012). According to this study, about 35% of the respondents prefer meat from young animals, while 20% preferred from middle aged animals, 14% from old animals and 31% consume meat irrespective of the age of the animal. The high number of people associated with the consumption of meats from young animal probably could be as a result of preference for lean meat which characterizes younger animals.The major constraints related to sheep marketing in the study area are shown on Table 30.Seasonality of market price, lack of market information, and over exploitation by brokers were the major constraints identified by the households. (Solomon, 2008). The higher proportion of animals with red coat colour could be a reflection of strong selection for animals manifesting red colour to meet the preference of market demand. The majorities (81.96%) of sampled population of study area had medium and smooth hair type followed by short and smooth (14.63 %) and long and smooth (3.41%). The observed hair type was similar with Dawuro and Konta sheep types reported previously (Amelmal, 2011).The face profile of most of the sample population was flat (73.4%) followed by convex (13.57%) and concave (13.03%). Moreover, majority of the sheep population do not have wattle (94.4%), and all of them had no ruff. The majority of the sampled sheep population had straight tip (95.58%) tail sheep while the others (4.42%) had tail shape twisted end curved at tip. Almost 99.89% of the sampled population had long fat tail. Similarly, Solomon (2008) reported that Arsi-Bale sheep had long fat tailed with some of them having tail shape which is twisted at the end and all had hair fiber type.The most dominant ear orientation or form of sampled sheep population of female was carried horizontal (73.54%) followed by semi pendulous(21.30%) and erect(5.15%) whereas the male was carried horizontal (46%) followed by semi pendulous(38.30%) and erect(15.62%) . The majority (74.89%) of the females' sheep were polled whereas 87.5% of the male sheep were horned. Out of the horned male sheep, 56.25% had spiral horn shape followed by straight (31.25%) and (12.6%) rudimentary horn shape. These findings are contrary to the results of Solomon. (2008), who reported that above 50% Arsi Bale female sheep were horned (52%). , respectively(Table 32). The change in body weight was higher in both sexes between the age class 0 PPI and 1PPI, which was approximately 8.68kg. This might be due to the wide age range of the sample populations. From this study, it can be shown that the sample sheep populations attain their mature weight when they had ≥1PPI. Similar trend was reported for Black head Somali (Fikrte, 2008), Bonga (Zewdu, 2008), and Horro, sheep breeds (Sisay, 2009). Sheep is the most important livestock species which have been adapted to a range of environments extending from the cool alpine climate of the mountains to the hot and arid pastoral areas of the lowlands. It play an important economic role and make a significant contribution to both domestic and export markets through provision of food (meat and milk)and non-food (manure, skin and wool) products. However, sheep production is constrained by various factors in Ethiopia that needs to be addressed by systematically describing and characterizing the production and marketing system, consumer preferences, and phenotypic attributes and thereby prioritize and implement appropriate interventions (research and development) through the involvement of stakeholders to address the challenges.The existing knowledge on characterization of sheep genetic resources and production and marketing system in various region of the country shows that the information on breed level characterization is inadequate. The present study was, therefore, conducted in Bensa district of Sidama zone of southern Ethiopia to characterize the physical, their environment, consumer preferences, and to identify the sheep population category in the study area. Data were collected from 128 sheep producers who were selected using stratified random sampling technique. For consumer preferences and marketing system, rapid market appraisal was employed in the study area. For assessment of qualitative and quantitative traits, a total of 574 sheep (0PPI to 3PPI) of both sexes were randomly sampled in the study area. Focus group discussions and key informants interview were held to strengthen the findings the survey. From this study it could be concluded that the sheep production system in the study area was more of extensive production system. The major production constraints in the study area were feed shortage, prevalence of diseases and parasites and lack of market information. The natural uncontrolled mating with small flock size is predominant in the study area. The study revealed that, there is no selection of fast growing animals with desirable traits. Moreover, sheep fattening is not common in the study area. On the other hand, due to the presence of suitable traits there is high demand for the indigenous sheep from domestic markets.However, since farmers in the area follow traditional husbandry practices, without any extension support, they are unable to make use of the existing market opportunity. Based on the current study the following recommendations have been made:❖ The present study showed that sheep producers dispose fast growing animals at younger age through sale at the market. Therefore, community based selective breeding program needed to control negative selection and improve the performance and productivity of sheep particularly males.❖ Since feed shortage in-terms of quantity and quality is among the leading constraints limiting sheep value chain development in the study area, efforts should be made to improve grazing land through top dressing with urea and controlled grazing, introduction of improved fodder grasses and legumes consistent with the respective farming system, and enhancement of the nutritive value of crop residues through urea treatment.❖ Prevalence of disease and parasites, and poor health management negatively influenced productivity of sheep flock in the study area. Hence, the type, seasonal occurrence and economic losses due to the diseases and parasites should be documented and pertinent control measure should be introduced.❖ The predominant production system of the area is traditional low-input-low-output with little market orientation (producers do not target the market or lack of focus on consumer preference). Thus, effort should be geared to transform the system into market oriented system using value chain framework (involvement of stakeholders).❖ The study showed that producers have no access for market information. Therefore, it is important to disseminate livestock market information on time to actors and service providers through electronic and printed media, extension staff, and through breeders cooperative.❖ The study demonstrated that producers have poor capacity to adopt improved sheep production techniques. Thus, effort should be made to create awareness and develop capacity of producers on the subject.❖ The prevalent sheep commodity development approach focuses on improving the production of the animals and ignores its contribution to income and livelihood of the household. Thus, in order to make sheep development strategies sustainable effort should also be made on improving income and livelihood of the producers, input/service providers and processors/traders. This should be done by government, research and developmental organizations. ","tokenCount":"13376"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0673212077.json b/data/part_2/0673212077.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bf81962fd9d372c54e89eca9130dfebe0f96234e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0673212077.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"212467ec6cab6b76c8b61834635810b0","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/5884e3ec-f3b7-4de7-a8c6-2b3990776a1c/retrieve","id":"-566501068"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"7f09c82d-9d14-4228-adfa-f98830380365","pagecount":"2","content":"TechFit is a tool to prioritize and select animal feed interventions. It was developed by ILRI under the leadership of Alan Duncan. It has been further refined and developed with inputs from many individuals in and beyond CGIAR. This is one of a series of feed intervention 'TechSheets' developed alongside the TechFit tool to provide summarized information on different interventions included in the tool. Werner Stür led the development of the TechSheets. This sheet was prepared by Werner Stür. TechFit is supported by the CGIAR Research Program on Livestock and Fish. ilri.org/techfit Feed intervention >> Fodder production, grassland development and utilization> Improved planted forages  Enables year-round livestock production.  Farmers can produce milk and beef at times when prices are high and, for beef production, animals for fattening are relatively cheap. Can be highly profitable.Intensive fodder production for sale as fresh feed, grown with irrigation and high fertilizer inputs in northeast Thailand Pumping water for forage production from a pond Irrigated forages by smallholder, Thailand Small plot for forage grasses, watered by hand, Cambodia Description  Irrigating small areas of intensively managed forages needed for year-round dairy and beef production is common in Southeast Asia. It is one of the simplest ways of overcoming food scarcity in the dry season. Smallholder farmers mostly use small on-farm ponds or wells as the water source to irrigate small areas; often 500-1,000m 2 . For small areas farmers use hand watering but mostly farmers use a small pump and hand-held hose for watering small areas. For larger areas, farmers use a pump for furrow or flood irrigation. Very occasionally farmers use sprinkler irrigations, particularly if these are also used for irrigating other high-value crops. Irrigation of fodder maize and other annual fodder crops is also common in parts of the tropics. Produces very high yields of green forage at times when availability of green feed is severely limited. Can be used as a sole feed for high productivity or as supplement to lower quality basal feed such as rice straw.","tokenCount":"338"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0679033152.json b/data/part_2/0679033152.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..84a87e710c2a12ac8b30932994b47e7117e3e0bd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0679033152.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"586d46fc94e8f2019972c3f858cc8cae","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/d01ecd84-ed1e-4caa-8562-9d2a981d50c1/retrieve","id":"280973802"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b74642d0-3513-4bd4-b7a4-969d84f3c365","pagecount":"32","content":"The results of an analysis of the spatial distribution of disease risk and its visual presentation through risk maps allow for the design of targeted and therefore more cost-effective animal disease surveillance strategies. There are various methods by which disease risk maps can be generated. One of these is multicriteria decision modelling (MCDM) which is a knowledgedriven approach to the production of risk maps.As with all modelling work, it is important for the user of these outputs to be aware of the assumptions made in relation to the models and any potential sources of selection and information bias when interpreting the results of such analyses.The objective of this study was to describe the spatial variation in the likelihood of (i) introduction and (ii) spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) subtype H5N1 on a continental scale in Africa.This report describes the methods used to produce likelihood maps illustrating the likelihood of introduction and subsequent spread of HPAIV H5N1 at both the continental and country level (Kenya, Nigeria, Ethiopia and Ghana; targeted countries of the DfID project), and highlights limitations associated with the maps.MCDM is an example of static knowledge-driven modelling that can be used to produce qualitative or quantitative estimates of risk 'based on existing or hypothesized understanding of the causal relationships leading to disease occurrence' (Pfeiffer et al., 2008). Knowledge of the risk factors associated with the occurrence of a disease and their interrelationships is used to drive the model.In contrast to data-driven modelling, MCDM cannot generate estimates of absolute risk, but rather describes variation in absolute risk. This means a map produced using MCDM will allow for the identification of areas with relatively higher and lower risk of event occurrence without quantifying what the risk is, and but it will thereby still inform targeting of risk management activities. To reduce the chances of the map outputs being misinterpreted, the term 'likelihood maps' was used in this report instead of 'risk maps'. However, it is acknowledged that both terms have a similar meaning.MCDM involves the following sequence of analytical steps which were also used to structure this report:1. Defining the objective(s) 2. Defining the factors 3. Defining the relationship between each factor and the risk 4. Sourcing digital maps of the factors and constraints 5. Standardising the maps so that they can be compared 6. Defining the relative importance of each factor in relation to the objective 7. Combining all factors and constraints to produce a final weighted estimate of risk for each location in the study area 8. Sensitivity analysis Geographic data were visualised and manipulated using ArcGIS 9.2 (ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA) and IDRISI Andes (Clark Labs, Worcester, MA, USA). The multicriteria decision model was developed in IDRISI Andes.The objectives of the likelihood mapping exercise were to identify factors associated separately with the (i) introduction or (ii) spread of HPAIV H5N1 in Africa, and to combine them using MCDM to produce maps separately showing the likelihood of introduction or spread HPAIV H5N1 in Africa. Note that no attempt was made to combine likelihood of introduction and spread, as it was felt that both processes will require different measures of risk mitigation. Furthermore, both results are subject to significant uncertainty which cannot be quantified when using MCDM, and combining the results may lead to propagation of bias that it would be difficult to consider when interpreting the results.'Introduction' was defined as: 'The introduction of single or multiple instances of HPAIV H5N1 into an area through migratory birds or the legal or illegal movement of infected domestic poultry or poultry products'.'Spread' was defined as: 'The dissemination of HPAIV H5N1 within an area through the legal or illegal movement of infected domestic poultry or poultry products conditional on successful introduction'.A systematic review of the published literature on the epidemiology of HPAIV H5N1 was used to identify risk factors associated with the introduction and subsequent spread of HPAIV H5N1, within an African context, and to define the relationship between each risk factor and the likelihood of introduction or spread. Searches for relevant literature were performed on two scientific databases assumed to represent the majority of the veterinary and medical journals; PubMed/Medline (a standard general medical database) and ISI Web of Knowledge (veterinary medicine and public health). A detailed description of the search algorithms and the complete list of risk factors identified can be found on pages 1-6 to 1-9 of the Initial Bird Flu Risk Maps Report (EDRS-AIA, 2009).Risk factors were categorised according to their relevance for introduction or spread of the disease (Table 1 and 2). Two selection criteria were used to identify risk factors for inclusion in the MCDM: Relevance and importance of a risk factor to the epidemiology of HPAIV H5N1 in Africa  Ability of the risk factor to be mapped (e.g. \"owner lives off farm\" [Kung, Morris et al. 2007] is a risk factor for spread that cannot be represented on a map whereas \"water area\" (Ducatez 2006) is a risk factor that can be spatially represented.Tables 1 and 2 list the risk factors which meet both selection criteria for either introduction or spread of HPAI H5N1 in Africa, and were therefore incorporated into the model. Hypothesized relationship between potential risk factor and the introduction of HPAIV H5N1 in AfricaFor the MCDM likelihood mapping, it was assumed that migratory birds constitute a risk for the introduction of HPAIV H5N1 into Africa. The migratory flyways covering areas in Africa represent areas expected to be at higher likelihood of introduction of bird flu.The role of migratory birds in long distance transmission of HPAI H5N1 has been considered in several studies, but still remains controversial due to many knowledge gaps. Wild birds (especially wild ducks) were identified as potential long distance vectors for the virus in various studies (Kilpatrick et al., 2006;Stallknecht, 2007;Gaidet et al., 2008b;Keawcharoen et al., 2008), while other authors considered it unlikely (Feare, 2007;Saad, 2007;Weber and Stilianakis, 2007). Different risk assessments of the introduction of HPAI H5N1 into different regions have concluded that the role of migratory birds was low but not negligible, with high uncertainty (Pfeiffer et al., 2006;Goutard et al., 2007;Sabirovic et al., 2007).Increasing distance from surface water is expected to be associated with decreasing likelihood of introduction of the disease in Africa.Wetlands are considered to be aggregation sites for migratory and resident wild birds and therefore constitute potentially higher risk areas for introduction and transmission of HPAIV (Hlinak et al., 2006;Jourdain et al., 2007), as was suggested for Nigeria (Ducatez, 2006). Surveillance studies conducted in several major wetlands of Africa isolated AI viruses in Eurasian and Afro-tropical species of wild birds (Gaidet et al., 2007;Gaidet et al., 2008a). Distance to wetland areas containing migratory waterfowl species has also been hypothesised as a risk factor for the introduction of disease in Spain (Martinez et al., 2009).For the MCDM likelihood mapping, it was hypothesized that international poultry trade occurs via roads, ports and airports, and that increasing density of ports, airports and roads is associated with a higher risk of introduction of HPAIV H5N1.Poultry trade has been identified as a risk factor for introduction of HPAIV (Ducatez, 2006;Kilpatrick et al., 2006). A study published in 2007 stressed the importance of formal and informal trade for the introduction of the disease in previously unaffected areas, as it seems was the case in Nigeria (Vannier, 2007). In addition, proximity to highways was found to be associated with the risk of HPAIV outbreak in China (Fang et al., 2008), and this is likely to be due to increased movements of poultry and poultry products for trade.DfID Africa -Likelihood maps April 2009 -Page 7 of 32Increasing density of roads is expected to be associated with increasing movements of poultry and poultry products for trade, and thus higher risk of disease spread.Outbreak risk was associated with proximity to major roads in Romania (Ward et al., 2008) and China (Fang et al., 2008). This is likely to be due to transport of poultry for trade via road.Increasing distance from navigable rivers is expected to be associated with decreasing risk of spread of the disease.There is no published evidence for the direct role of navigable rivers in the spread of HPAIV.,However, given the identification of roads as a risk factor (Fang et al., 2008;Ward et al., 2008) such a role can be hypothesized for important rivers in Africa known to be used for transport of consumption goods and livestock.Increasing density of poultry is expected to be associated with a higher contact rate between susceptible and infected birds and therefore greater risk of spread.It was found that H5N1 persistence in Nigeria was correlated with backyard chicken and duck numbers (Cecchi et al., 2008). Proximity to an infected farm has been shown to be an important factor in the spread of low pathogenicity influenza viruses (Mannelli et al., 2006) as well as distance to the nearest case farm (Nishiguchi et al., 2007). Conversely, Fang et al., 2008 found no association between poultry density and the risk of HPAIV infection in China, arguing that this unexpected finding was due to a greater proportion of industrialised chicken production at higher poultry densities, with associated higher biosecurity standards and vaccination protocols. Henning et al. (2009) found that poultry density was a risk factor for HPAIV outbreaks in Vietnam, but only at medium population densities. High poultry density was postulated as a risk factor for HPAIV occurrence in Thailand (Tiensin et al., 2005) and in Hong Kong (Kung et al., 2007), although this has been shown to be associated more with duck density alone than total poultry density (Gilbert et al., 2006).Increasing density of cities is expected to be associated with increasing risk of spread of HPAI H5N1. Cities are associated with higher demand for poultry products and therefore the presence of trading areas providing live or freshly slaughtered birds. Low pathogenicity viruses have been isolated from poultry in live bird markets in the USA (Bulaga, 2003), China (Cheung et al., 2007) and Korea (Choi et al., 2005), and HPAI has been isolated from a live bird market in Vietnam (Nguyen et al., 2005). Sale of chicken at retail markets was also identified as a risk factor for HPAI infection of farms in Hong Kong (Kung et al., 2007). The risk of HPAI outbreak was found to be negatively associated with increasing distance from higher density human population areas (Pfeiffer et al., 2007), and this is likely to be due to increased intensity of production and trade of poultry in highly populated areas.Increasing distance from wetlands and waterbodies is expected to be associated with decreasing risk of spread of the disease. Proximity to wetlands has been shown to be a risk factor for the occurrence of HPAI in poultry in South-East Asia (Gilbert et al., 2006;Fang et al., 2008), as has proximity to rivers and wetlands in Romania (Ward et al., 2008;Ward et al., 2009). Distance to wetland areas containing migratory waterfowl species has been hypothesised as a risk factor for disease in Nigeria (Cecchi et al., 2008).Proximity to irrigated areas is expected to be associated with increased risk of spread of HPAI H5N1. Rice crop production has been found to be associated with HPAI in Vietnam and Thailand (Gilbert, 2007;Pfeiffer et al., 2007), as has aquaculture (Pfeiffer et al., 2007).DfID Africa -Likelihood maps April 2009 -Page 8 of 32Geographic inputs for the model need to be in the form of raster maps. However, it seldom happens that the exact raster maps needed for the MCDM are readily available in the required format; they usually need to be derived from existing map layers of the risk factors. Sometimes all that is necessary is a simple conversion from vector to raster format, but at other times the first generation of risk factor maps require extensive manipulation to produce the raster maps that will be included in the modelling process.Risk factor maps were manipulated as presented in Tables 3 and 4 to produce the raster maps needed for the multicriteria decision modelling. Where required the raster maps were then reclassified so that their scale was positively correlated with the outcome (likelihood of disease introduction or spread) and map scales were standardized by converting each one to a byte binary scale ranging from 0 to 255.A more detailed description of the risk factor maps is available in the Initial Bird Flu Risk Map Report (EDRS-AIA, 2009).DfID Africa -Likelihood maps April 2009 -Page 9 of 32 Five members of the project team with experience in either avian influenza epidemiology or knowledge about the field situation in Africa weighted pairs of risk factors specifying firstly whether Factor A (for example) was more or less important than Factor B (for example) regarding the introduction or spread of HPAIV H5N1 in Africa and secondly, the degree of importance. Factor A could be (i) Equally, (ii) Moderately, (iii) Strongly or (iv) Very Strongly, more or less important than Factor B. These weightings were based on each team member's expert opinion, and were performed for each pairwise combination of factors. The five sets of weightings were then compared and where three of the five team members had the same weighting, it was taken to be the agreed weighting. Where there were discrepancies between team members' weightings for any pair of factors, the weighting was discussed and a final weighting agreed upon. The agreed weightings for each pairwise comparison of the risk factors for the introduction and spread of HPAIV H5N1 in Africa are presented in Tables 5 and 6. For the pairwise comparison risk factors in the rows are weighted relative to the risk factors in the columns. For example, reading from Table 5, the risk factor density of airports is considered to be moderately more important than distance from waterbodies for the introduction of HPAIV H5N1 into Africa. The agreed pairwise weightings were used to derive a weight for each risk factor by taking the principal eigenvector of the pairwise comparisons, and these weights were incorporated into the multicriteria decision model (Tables 7 and 8).DfID Africa -Likelihood maps April 2009 -Page 12 of 32 The data presented in Table 7 indicates that the experts felt that the likelihood of introduction is most strongly influenced by trade networks (total weight = 0.84) and much less by exposure to migrating wild birds (total weight = 0.16), and this assumption therefore strongly influences the likelihood scores generated by the MCDM for likelihood of introduction. The data presented in Table 8 indicates that the experts felt that the likelihood of spread given introduction is most strongly influenced by road networks (total weight = 0.46), urbanisation (weight = 0.15) and poultry density (weight = 0.15) and much less by access to surface water (total weight = 0.08), and this assumption will therefore strongly influence the likelihood scores for spread generated by the MCDM.The risk factor maps and weights were combined using a method known as weighted linear combination (WLC) (Pfeiffer, Robinson et al 2008;Malczewski 1999) in which factors with a higher weight exert a greater influence on the final likelihood estimate. An explanation of the combination method can be found on pages 3-4 of the Initial Bird Flu Risk Map Report (EDRS-AIA, 2009). The combination method generated a numeric likelihood score on a scale of 0 (lower likelihood) to 255 (higher likelihood) for each pixel of the map. This score has a range from 0-255 to allow taking advantage of the colour range used by the Idrisi Andes software. The numerical value has no absolute likelihood interpretation but rather one of relative likelihood, i.e. allowing characterisation of locations with relatively lower or higher likelihood.The resulting maps identify: Area(s) of the continent where HPAIV H5N1 is most likely to be introduced -based on the risk factors considered (Figure 1);  Area(s) of the continent where an outbreak of HPAIV H5N1 has the greatest likelihood to spread given that it has been introduced -based on the risk factors considered (Figure 2).Areas identified as having the highest likelihood of introduction of HPAIV H5N1 include the Nile Delta, the coastline of Northern Africa, Western Africa, and parts of South Africa (Figure 1). Areas identified as having the lowest likelihood of introduction include Northern Africa, Somalia, Ethiopia and Botswana (Figure 1).Most of sub-Saharan Africa was identified as having the highest likelihood for the spread of HPAIV H5N1 (Figure 2). In other words, most areas of the continent are more vulnerable to spread once introduction has occurred, than to the initial introduction of HPAIV H5N1.Regions with the lowest likelihood of spread include Northern Africa, Somalia, Angola, Namibia and the south-west parts of South Africa (Figure 2). For each risk factor two new weights were calculated by (i) adding and (ii) subtracting 25% from the original weight. Each of the newly calculated weights was then individually incorporated into the multicriteria decision model, while holding all other factor weights constant, thereby generating 16 new likelihood maps. The likelihood estimate was measured at 10 000 randomly selected locations on each of the maps, and the average change in the likelihood estimate as a result of altering the different factor weights was calculated (Tables 7 and 8). The highest average change in the likelihood score was 3.91 + 2.29 as a result of decreasing the weight assigned to tertiary road density in the spread of disease. In other words, changing the weight assigned to tertiary road density by 25% would be expected to change the final overall risk score for the spread of avian flu by only 2 to 6 points on a scale of 255.Likelihood estimates for both disease introduction and spread were highly robust, showing little change as a result of the altered weights. But it needs to be noted that this does not provide information about the validity of the likelihood scores, but rather their stability given variation in the relative weighting of the risk factors used to generated the scores. From the continental likelihood maps for introduction and spread (Figures 1 and 2), maps for four countries were extracted; Ethiopia, Nigeria, Kenya and Ghana. These country-level likelihood maps (Figures 3 to 10) are presented on the following pages. Note that the range of the colour scale used to present the variation in likelihood was based on the map for the whole continent. The map presented in Figure 3 shows that the likelihood of introduction of HPAIV H5N1 is fairly homogeneous across Ethiopia. But there are some pockets of increased likelihood of introduction. The map presented in Figure 4 shows that the likelihood of spread of HPAIV H5N1 assuming that the virus has been successfully introduced into Ethiopia. It is apparent that the likelihood is higher towards the western half of the country, and lower in the eastern parts.DfID Africa -Likelihood maps April 2009 -Page 21 of 32 The map presented in Figure 5 shows that the likelihood of introduction of HPAIV H5N1 is fairly homogeneous across Kenya. But there are some pockets of increased likelihood of introduction. The map presented in Figure 6 shows that the likelihood of spread of HPAIV H5N1 assuming that the virus has been successfully introduced into Kenya. It is apparent that the likelihood is higher towards the southern half of the country, and lower in the northern parts. The map presented in Figure 7 shows that the likelihood of introduction of HPAIV H5N1 varies across Ghana. But no clear pattern can be defined, apart from there being a small number of high likelihood locations. The map presented in Figure 8 shows that the likelihood of spread of HPAIV H5N1 assuming that the virus has been successfully introduced into Ghana. It is apparent that the likelihood is increases towards the eastern part of the country, and is lowest in the south-west. The map presented in Figure 9 shows that the likelihood of introduction of HPAIV H5N1 varies across Nigeria. There a pockets of increased risk spread across the country, and the risk appears to be highest in the south. The map presented in Figure 10 shows that the likelihood of spread of HPAIV H5N1 assuming that the virus has been successfully introduced into Nigeria. It is apparent that the likelihood is relatively homogenous, but high across the country.One of the key findings of the continental analysis is that the likelihood of introduction is relatively homogenous across Africa with small pockets of increased likelihood spread out across Africa. This finding is most likely the result of giving ports and airports a relatively high weighting in the MCDM for likelihood of introduction. A high likelihood for spread assuming successful introduction of HPAIV H5N1 is geographically more widespread, mainly influenced by the assumption that continental transport networks (roads, navigable rivers and internal airports) have a key influence on spread once the virus has been introduced. However, these results should be interpreted with care, taking into account that they are based on assumptions made by the experts in relation to the selection of risk factors and their relative importance, the quality of the data used as well as the method used to weight the different risk factors.Data quality: The quality of the data used as geographical inputs for the model varies. For example, we suspect that data pertaining to the number of ports and airports might be an underestimate of the current situation. In addition, the road map displayed only primary, secondary and tertiary roads; data on minor roads, which could play an important role in the illegal trade of poultry, were unavailable.Proxies: When data for specific risk factors was unavailable, proxy data was used. For example, as there is no available data on the location of markets in Africa, cities with human populations of more than 50 000 were used as proxies for the location of markets. This may bias the results as even if the main markets would be located in the main cities, marketing activities in rural areas might play an important role in legal or illegal trade.Influence: Weighting of the different risk factors was performed by only five people who have, of necessity, been involved in all aspects of the development of these risk maps from the outset. The participants may have therefore have influenced each other's opinion regarding weighting of the risk factors.There is a general lack of knowledge and uncertainty regarding the introduction and spread of HPAI H5N1, not only in Africa, but worldwide. However, our access to the most up-to-date scientific knowledge on the subject hopefully translates into a better assessment of the risk factors involved and their relative importance in the introduction and spread of HPAI H5N1 in Africa.With data-driven models, outcome data and a set of risk factors are used to generate weights for the different risk factors so that the error in the outcome is minimised. With these methods, we are given an idea about lack of information through the amount of residual variance in the outcome. These models are affected by selection and information bias (misclassification of outcome and incorrect risk factor data) and by external validity issues. With a knowledge-driven model, we have no outcome data and therefore need to make subjective judgements to generate the weights for risk factors thereby creating a potentially substantial source of apparently unquantifiable bias, even with sensitivity analysis. This can be explored to some extent by using Dempster-Shafer theory (Dempster 1966;1967). We also have no mechanism for knowing whether important information is missing, and although MCDA models will not be affected by misclassification bias of the outcome, they can still be affected by data errors in the risk factors. These considerations should be taken into account when interpreting and using the risk maps.","tokenCount":"3925"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0691971516.json b/data/part_2/0691971516.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3456dc1c684251752630abf4be22e09da49d1b9d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0691971516.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"50d9d6397929ae9aed4cdcd968900237","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/c766bade-d443-4d81-aea3-57f3cf5a042a/retrieve","id":"-1370454314"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"119258c9-ff23-4278-8c89-390be9c6dd87","pagecount":"40","content":"El fríjol común (I'haseolusvulgaris L ies un componente importante de la dieta humana en América Latina , donde se produce el 35 por cien to de la producción mundial. El fríjol es un a fuente especialmente importante de proteinas en la dieta de las familias de ingresos medios y bajos, que no puede n comprar o producir proteina an im al. El centro de orige n del fríjol se encuentra en América Lat ina (Miranda , 1967 Y Hend ri ch, 1969).Los rendimientos de las le gum inosas de gran o cosme tible, especialmente Jos de fríjol . varían considerablemente. En algunos ex perimentos se han registrado rendimientos de fríjol hasta de 5.000 kg/ha*. En ensayos varietales replicados, establecidos en la Estación Ex perimental del Centro Intemací onal de Agricultura Tropical (CIAr) , ce rc a a Pal mira, Colombia, es usual obtener rendimientos de aproximadamen te 3.000 kg/ha. Los rendimientos de las fin cas son ge neralmente más bajos y flu ctúan desde 200 hasta 2.800 kg/ ha. El nivel de produc tividad es más al to en los paises de sarrollados y en 1<.1 5 ,¡ Te as en las que se pueden utilil,ar in sumas tecn()lógicos y tiende a disminuir en las laderas de las cordilleras . El rendimiento promedio de América Latina fue del orde n de 580 a 620 kg/ha duran te el período 1952-197 1 (Cuadro 1). En té rminos ge nerales, los rendimientos y el indice de mejo ramiento Cuadro l . Diferencias en la producción de Phaseolus vulgaris de acuerdo con las zonas y las épocas de siembra . /971 ., de los rendimientos de frijol son mucho más bajos que los de Jos cereales. Por ejemplo, los rendimientos mundiales de arroz han aumentado en un 40 por ciento hasta 2.280 kg/ha . durante los últimos 20 años (Manual de Producción de la FAD, 1973). Roberts (1967), al revisar los rendimient os de las leguminosas de grano en el mundo, citó la falta de investigación pertinente como uno de Jos principales factores limitantcs de los rendimi entos. Después de es tudiar el potencial de los programas nacionale s y regionaJes de cereales. Roberts concluyó que con este tipo de progra• ma s no se púdia obtener mayores rendimient os . por lo que sugiri ó diseñar programas integrados de investigación sobre legu minosas de gran o que les se rvirian de respaldo a taj es programas nacionaJes y se reaJizarian a través de los centros intenlacionales de investigac ión. Se propuso que el erAT fuera el centro internacional que se ocupara de la in vestigación sobre el cultiv o de ffl'jOl. Aunqu e algunos miembros del pe rsonal habian trabajado anteriormente con Phaseolus vulgaris, el proyecto integrado de inves ti gación de fr íjol no se inició hasta e l año fiscal 1972•1973. Es te programa es uno de Jos d os programas de productos agropecuarios del CIAT que no se limit a a la s tierras bajas tropicales.El Crupo Consultiv o para la Investigación Agrícola Internacional (CCIAR) ha hecho responsab!e al CIAT de la investigación sobre producción de fríjol a nivel regional . Además, el CIAT es un o de los principales centros de gennoplasma de fríjol. Recie nt emente. el Comité Téc nico Asesor del G rupo Consultivo le solicitó desarro• llar una red coordinada de investigación en tod a América Latin a.Es ta publicación describe varios aspectos de la producción de frijol en Amé• rica Latina. Busca identifica r las <Íreas en las que se requiere mayor investigación o desa rro llar actividades similares y a las que el Programa de Sistemas de Producció n de Fríjol del CIAT podria contribuir beneficiándose todas las partes involucrad as. Igualmen te, se di scu ten los logros del prog ram a realizados hasta la fecha y las ac ti• vidades proyectadas hacia el futuro.La producción de fr ijol en América Latina se ll eva a ca bo princjpalmente en propiedades pequeñas, generalmente. sob re terre no o ndul ado. En El Salvador, por ejemplo, más del 95 por ciento de la producción de frijol se obtiene en fin cas de menos de 5 hectá reas. En Panamá. el tamaño promedio de las fincas productoras de fn\"jol es de sólo 2,6 hectáreas. Generalmente , el fríjol trepa dor, de hábit o de cre ci• miento inde terminado. se siembra con mal\"/. . Los sistemas mecanizados y la mano de o bra que no sea n Jos de las mism as familias. son escaso s : los insumos técnicos, tri.' les C0l110 fertilizantes. her bicidas y pesticidas, son generalmente limitados (Gutié• !Tei' (' Iaf.,19 75). Los pcquciios agricultores tambi én afIon.tan dificultades de merca• deo. restricciones de crédito y serv icios de extensi ón dcficientes. Tal ve z. a estos mot ivos se deba el que la mayoria de los paises estudiados pur Pinchinat (1973) ha• ya menc ionado Jos fac tores socioeconómil,;os como una de la s li mitaciones princi. pales de la producción .No obstante, en Chile, Perú, Brasil , México y Colombia existen vastas áreas en las cuales los rendimientos y el uso de insumos tecnológicos ya han alcanzado prácticamente los que se registran en Estados Unidos_ En estas áreas se cultivan fríjoles arbustivos que reciben abundante can tidad de fertilizantes y herbicidas ~ la preparación de la tierra y la recolección son mecanizadas y, con frecuencia , se utiliza el riego. Este sistema de producción es el que ha sido más extensamente estudiado, especialmente en los Estados Unidos (ver los Informes Anuales Cooperativos sobre Mejoramiento de Fríjol, 1962de Fríjol, -1974))_ En cambio, es poco lo que se conoce sobre el sistema de producción asociada de maíz y frijol.Entre las diferentes razones aducidas para explicar los rendimientos generalmente baj os de frijol en América Latina (Roberts, 1970;He rnández-8ravo , 1973;Y Pinchinat , 1973), la más frecuente es la insuficiencia e inconsistencia del apoyo investigativo. Como se aprecia en el Cuadro 2, América Latina posee un número re-Cuadro 2. Distribuc.:ión por campo de especialización de investigadores en ¡fijol de 22 paúes latinoamericanos. • ducido de inves ti ga dore s de frijol. La mayoria de los programas nacionales emplean fitomejorad ores, agrónomos y patólogos , pero no sabemos con ce rteza si se trala de una necesidad nacional o si es simplemente el sistema educacionaJ empleado en estas áreas. Pocos program as tienen entomólogos, economistas, fisi ólogos, microbiólogos y es pecialistas en ge nn oplasma y cal idad de la semilla. Si bien es cie rto que la finandación de este sinnúmero de disciplinas reviste serias dificultades para los programas nacionales pequeños, también es evidente , como se podrá observar en las secciones siguientes, la necesidad de contar con dich os científi cos. Debe agregarse que la may oría del pe rson al que aparece en el Cuadro 2 trabaja con varios cultivos diferentes mi e ntras que men os de la mitad posee la preparació n científica apropiada.El fil o mejoramiento ha desempeñado y co ntinuará desempei'iando, un papel i~nportante en el incremento de los rendimientos de frIjol en América Latina . De los 13 programas nac io nales investigados por Pinchinat (1 973) , 1 1 consideraron el mejoramiento varietal de un valor prá<.:tico defini tivo durante el pe n'odo 1969-1972. Vieira e l al. (1971))comparó los resultado s obtenidos en mas de 20 localidades en Minas Gerais y Goias donde las variedades mejoradas, tales como Ri co 23 y Rosinha da Seca, superaron en un 80 por ciento los rendimientos de las variedades locales.A pesa r de la imporlancia del mejo ramie nto varietal y d~da la gran variabilidad genética del Phaseoi/l s ¡!/llgaris. muy pocm prog ramas nacionales cuentan con los recursos para mantener oconseguir gennoplasma , lo cual re dundaría en beneficio de los programas de fitomejoramiento. Por co nsiguient e, el banco de germop tasm a del CIAT es la respu esta a las solic itudes naci o nal es de mantener ge nnoplasmél disponible , t31 como se manifestó en el Seminari o sobre El potencial del fn'jol y de ot ras leguminosas de grano comestible en América Latina . reali z a folillI máX ima '= índicc de áre a de~pu ¿s de la noraci ón peciolos, dc 'a~ ~ainas y de los fr ijoles. en ~, mome n• rcndun icnto fríjol ( u de I~ madl'l n':l. mas la ma ll'ria $Cea roHar O1a~im a, , Eficienda de rcnd irn iclllO de rTlJol (Rr) dc)pués dI. \"\" la Iloraclón díu huta la m:.zdurc1.rendIm iento fríjol , Eficicnei3 materia seca tOlal (MST) = ma te ria seca total Indl ~;: de co~eha ma lcoa:¡eu 10lal X 100 d íu hou ta la madurez dimientos de 515 a 1.545 kg/ha en una sola estación'. El e rAT también cooperó 'en la limpieza de la semilla de las variedades comerciales de Perú y de Brasil. En 1975, la mayoría de las líneas promisorias de gennoplasma no prese ntarán enfennedades transmitidas por la misma. sem illa y en la mayoria de los ensayos en la sede del ClAT se utilizará solamente semilla libre de patógenos . Deb ido a las restricciones nacionales sobre cuarentena vegetal, la labor del CrAT en este programa será la de limpiar la semilla básica e identificar las áreas dentro de los paises en los cuales se pueda multiplicar esta semilla libre 'de patÓgeno\"s .Los estudios sobre protección de las plantas efectuados en 1974 enfatizaron el y de piretros no tóxic os. Aun que se e nsaya ron vari os insecticidas para verificar su control en el campo y se hicieron algunas recomendaciones, se tra taba de encontrar soluciones a corto pla zo las cuaJes n o serán parte ese ncial del p rograma de spués de 1974.Se efectuaro n estudios patol ógicos si mila res, ent re los que se incluyen: 1) la evaluación de las pé rdidas de rencli m iento debidas a enfe rmedades específic as y a las epocas de com ienzo de la enferme dad; 2) la innuencia de las p rá.cticas cult!J ral es, t illes como la densidad de siembra en la incidencia, gravedad y difu sión de la crifc nn e• dad; y 3) una eva luación del control que eje rcen los fu ngicidas en variqs patóge nos principales (Figura J J) .Como se menc ionó anterio nnen' te en la Sección 11, diversos problem3s soc ioeconóm icos lim itan la productivida d de l fn' iol en Amé:ica Latin a. Para log rar un a mejor comprensión de la te cnología qu e actualmente se encuentra disponible para los agricultores y del impact o que la nueva te cno logia podrta tener , el grupo de Economía Agrícola del CIAT es ta est udiando la producci ón de ffljol en tres áreas principaJ es de Colombia . Se está recopi land o información detallada sobre las prácticas cu ltu rales co rrientes, especialmente los sistemas de siembra , meca ni zac ión , uso de semillas, fertilizantes y plagu icídas; por ot ra pa rte, se cuen ta con agrónomos ad iestrados encargados de inspeccionar los cu lti vos para encontrar las plagas y defi• cie ncias de nutrimentos. También , se están es tudiando los problemas asociados con el mercadeo y la financiación de la producción. Los resultados preliminares sobre 72 de las fincas est udjadas presentan las diferencias principa les en el uso de crédit o y tecn ología ent re las tres áreas (ver Cuadro 11) y ay udarán al CIAT a asignar sus re • cursos de investigación.La red latinoamericana de investigación sobre f~/jvlComo se mencionó en la intro ducción . al CIAT se le soli citó es tablecer y coordinar una red latinoamericana de in vestigac ión sobre frijol. La Junta Directiva del ClAT, aunque en principio aceptó esta solicitud , pidió un año de plazo para considerar los progresos logrados con el programa hasta la fecha y las implicaciones futuras que los gastos del establecimiento de dicha red tendrían en el programa. Un donativo a corto plazo del Banco Interamericano de DesarroJ1o fInancia algunas de las actividades de investigación que se han encomendado a la red para su coordi• nación.Aunque en los programas nacionales e internacionales de investigación, lo mismo que en algunas disciplinas, se menciona con frecuencia la importancia de las redes cooperativas, la realidad es que muy pocas funcionan eficientemente , por una o más razones . El grupo organizador puede patrocinar unidades cooperativas 0 , por el contrario, no responder a sus necesidades. Puede darse duplicación de actividades dentro de la misma red y finalmente, se pueden presentar intereses encontrados que no admiten solución. Si la red de fríjol ha de ser operante debe es tar fundada sobre una base de respeto, complementación y ayuda mutua entre el CIA T y los programas nacionales y regionales. Dentro de esta red, el CIAT se deberia concentrar en las actividades que sean aplicables a toda América Latina, en tanto que los programas Cuadro 12. ¡'xperimentación cooperativa del programa de [\"jol ~'3n en el Cuadro 12 , ayu dar ían a resolver problemas espe cíficos fuera del alcance \\,. : las capacidades técnicas, disciplin arias y de dispunibilidad de genn oplasma de los programas nacio nales.Las re laciones de trabajo entre el personal del CIAT y los inves tigador« de Colombia, Ec uador, Guatemala y Perú eran.exce lentes, incluso antes de presentarse la sol icitud del Comité Técnico Asesor. Entre las actividades realizadas en colaboración con estos países se enc uentran las siguientes: 1) Aseso rar a los go biernos sobre los requerimient os y pri oridades de la in ves tigación en fríjol ; 2) Suministrar germo• plasma y materiales selec tos; 3) Ad ies trar cientíncos; 4) Brindar servicios de docume ntaci ón; y 5) organi za r la experimentación cooperativa. La red de investigación sobre fríjol continuará y am pli ará estas actividades. Recienteme nte, aJgunas institu• ciones de Brasil , Chile , Cos ta Ri ca y Venezuela expresaron su interés en el enfoque que se ha dado a la red de investigadón.Hemos mencionado algunas ac tividade s de la red de investigación so bre frij ol del CIAT ; po r ejemplo, la selecció n y sumini stro de gennoplasm a. En esta sección de la publicació n concentrarem os las ac tivida des de adies tramie nt o, se rvicios de in• fo rmación , organización de reuni ones y \" taJl e res\" y coordinación de experimenta. ció n cooperativa.Com o se me ncio nó en la Sección JI , el respaldo científico in suficiente e inconsistente es uno de los p rinc ipaJes fa c tores responsables de los bajos rendim ie ntos del fújo!. Muchos países no tienen los espedalis tas que req uieren y por lo ge ner,a l, tampoco puede n brincar a los cientlficos la opo rtunidad de es pecializa rse. El CIAT resaJta la importancia del adiestramiento a nivel de posgrado recibiendo becari os de tres ca tego rías, proce dentes de di ve rsos programas e in stitucione s nacionales. a) ¡.os Becarios de Posgrado. durante un periodo de sz is meses a un año en el CIAT, redben adiestramiento e in strucción sobre diseño y manejo de ex perimentos, aJ mismo tiempo que se les inco rpo ra al programa general de investigación. Mas de 20 becarios de nueve pa ises fu eron adie strados en el programa de fríj o l durante el período 1973-1974. UII as pect o esencial de este adiestramiento es mante ner el con• tacto entre el becario y el CIAT después de qu e és te termin a su per íodo. Tend\"-,, una duración variable y harán hincapié tanto en la parte teórica como en la práctica de los métodos propuestos para obtener una producción de fríjol más eficiente.La organización de un programa coordinado de adiestramiento para los inves• ligadores de fríjol de América Latina, constituye una necesidad esencial. Actualmente, hay varios centros o programas latinoamericanos (el CIAT, el Centro Agrícola Tropical de In~estigación y Ensenanza (CATlE) y la Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria (EMBRAPA» que poseen fondos y las facilidades para adiestrar a los investigadores dedicados al cultivo de fríjol. Varias universidades de países desarrollados (Cambridge, Comell, Florida y la Universidad Estatal de Michigan) también están involucradas en el adiestramiento de estudiantes de esta región. Los programas se deberían organizar de acuerdo con: a) el nivel de adiestramiento requerido; b) el equipo humano y la experiencia con que se cuente : e) las similitudes de clima y de sistemas de producción , entre el país del estudiante y la institución adiestradora.En Agosto de 1974, el Programa de Frijol estableció un servicio de resúmenes y documentación a través del cual los científicos y las instituci ones interesadas pueden recibir. a costo mínimo, tarjetas de resúmene s y bibliografías sobre la literatura disponible de frijol. En la Figura 12, aparece una tarjeta típica de resúmenes. Se comenzará el proyecto con la elaboración de resúmenes de las publicaciones más recientes, que se remontarán paulatinamente hasta 1960; para mayor conveniencia, estas tarjetas se publicarán en Inglés. A partir de 1976, las versiones en Inglés y en Espailol estarán en disponibilidad de quienes las soliciten .Los \"talleres\" cortos (tipo de reunión/discusión) sobre una disciplina especi• fica , con asistencia de 15 a 25 participantes, estimulan la colaboración, el mejoramiento de los métodos experimentales , la comparacfón detalJada de los resultados y un mayor contacto entre los científicos. Dichos talleres también garantizan una exposición constante del personal del CIAT a áreas específicas de problemas conectados con el cultivo del frijol. Cada año se planean dos talleres , de acuerdo con el siguiente progratna:-\" rl7-5: Taller sobre Protección de las Plantas . \"-f--~ -\\' segregantes se seleccionaron lIneas arbustivas, lineas con gu fa corta y lineas con ::::. _ , ' : ' : , ' . ' : ' ,, -: __ \" ' , < _ ' , ' , : _ : , ; _ , _ , ' . ' : , ' , -_ , , , ' : . _ , ' : ~ ía larga. La,' . Se espera que la investigacTón sob re cada uno de estos campos específicos esté suficientemente adelantada para la fecha que se ha establecido para cada taller (Fi• gura 1). De esta forma, el taHer sobre Fitomejoramiento y Gennoplasma , para 1975 , proveerá una oportunidad para djscutir las pruebas recíentemente conc1uídas sobre utili zaci ón de germoplasma y la forma en la cual los programas re gionaJes podrían utili zar más provechosamente el material disponible . El taller también debería tener disponible la progenia F3 de los materiales de fitomejoramiento que aparecen en el Cuadro 8 y discutir el proceso de transición de las pruebas básicas de rendimiento realizadas a nivel local a pruebas con alcance internacionaL Igualmente , el Taller sobre Economía, para 1977, debería coincidir con la te rmin ac ión de los dos es tudios económicos sobre los factores Iimitantes de Jos rendjmientos del fríj ol que se están llevando a cabo fuera de Colombia,El Cuadro 12 muestra las áreas de investigación cooperativa propuestas para 1975. Como se sugirió anterionnente , dichas áreas tratan de resolver problemas específicos de la localidad utilizando la experiencia y las facilidades técnicas del CIAT, conjuntamente con los conocimientos y la supervisión prestada por Jos científicos de los programas nacionales.Las pruebas regionales de rendimiento mencionadas anteriormente son un ejemplo patente de actividad internacional. La evaluación inicial en el CIAT servirá para identificar variedades o líneas promisorias, en cuanto al rendimiento, dentro de unas condiciones ecológicas limitadas. A fm de comparar tales materiales con los desarroUados por los programas nacionales se establecerán ensayos integrados de rendimiento en tantas áreas como sea posible. Para que estos ensayos tengan éxito será necesario reunirse con los líderes de los programas nacionales que deseen participar en los programas de pruebas de rendimiento y fijar, de común acuerdo, las variedades que deberían incluirse, el tipo de protección estándar con fertilizantes y plaguicidas que se debería establecer, el tamaño de las parcelas y la información que se 'debería recopilar.De igual manera, el ClA T puede poner a disposición de los agriculto res pequeñas cantidades de semilla limpia proveniente de su banco de germoplasma. No obstante, esto sólo puede hacerse multiplicando la semilla bajo el control de los programas nacionales interesados.Los estudios sobre Apion, la antracnosis y la mancha O mustia hilachosa, aunque son de importancia primordial para la región, no se pueden efectuar fácilmente en la sede del CIAT.Cuando se estudiaron las propuestas para formar la red cooperativa de investigación sobre el cultivo de fríjol para América Latina, el Comité Técnico Asesor resaltó la necesidad de crear un Comité Asesor de carácter científico. Se sugirió que dicho comité podría revisar las necesidades regionales de investigación, ayudar a canaliza r las áreas-problema al ClAT o a las entidades nacionales apropiadas y comunicarle al personal del programa de investigación de fríjol del CIAT aquellas deficiencias de orden técnico que aparecieran en su operación . El Director General o en su defecto, el Director General Asociado del CIAT, tambi én será miembro de es te comité. La integración y actividades del comité se revisarán y ratifica rán en el primer encuentro qu e tendrá lugar, probablemente, en Junio de 1975\",Como se mencionó en la Sección IV , exis ten numerosas áreas de in ves tigación del fríjol qu e se pueden estudiar en form a más apropiada en los laboratorios de los países desarrollados o bajo contratos especiales. Entre éstas se pueden mencionar las siguientes:Estu dios sobre temperatura del suelo. La temperatu ra del suelo en la sede del CIAT puede exceder los 45°C durante varias horas al día y en otras áreas se aproxima a los 60°C . Con temperat uras mucho más bajas di sminuye el crecimiento de las plantas y la fijación del nit rógeno en otras legu minosas de grano (Dart et al., 1973). El efecto de la te mperatura depen de casi siempre de la variedad o cepa que se esté estudiando. El CIAT no tie ne facilidades para e f..:ctuar expe rimentos con temperatura regulada; este fenómeno se podría es tudi ar mejor por me dio de inves tigación de apoyo realizada en otros laboratorios mejor equipados. En la sede del CIAT se continuará con las medidas prácticas para reducir la tempe ratura del suelo tales como la cubierta protectora , la labranza m ínima y los cultivos asociados. Con la cubie rta protec tora , en especial, se han obtenido buenos resultados.El desarrollo de germoplasma para tierras altas tropeza rá con el problema de las temperaturas bajas, lo cual requerirá un estudio similar.Enfermedades transmitidas por la semilla. Muchos aspe ctos de las enfermedades transmitidas por las semillas se pod rían estudiar en form a más eficaz fuera de la sede del CIAT . Por ejempl o , la difi cult ad 'de di stin guir entre !os problemas virajes con sintom atología simiJar, Existe mu cha confusión entre el virus del mosaico amarillo del fríjol (que se encuentra corrientemente en Chile), el viru~ del mosaico dorado (en Guatem,la) y el virus del mosaico ampolladO (e n El S?Jvador). Lo más ade• cuado para identificar ~stos virus difere!1tes sería utili za r los rr,étodos se rológicos pero esta técnica no se justifica dentro del programa del CIAT. El hecho de que va• riedades aparentemente libres de patógenos, algunas veces muestren síntomas en generaciones subsecuentes, es de interés directo para el eIAT. Se debe investigar el mecanismo mediante el cual estos virus o bacterias permanecen viables en las plan• tas sin causar daños visibles.Fertilización con fósforo. Ya se ha hecho alusión a la impo rtancia de la fertilización y del sistema de aplicación del fósforo. Si bien el CIAT no puede inves• tigar la química del fosfato en el suelo, el conocimiento en este campo ser ía sJmamente importante para desarrollar prácticas de fertilización. Igualmente, se debería detennmar la presencia de micorrizas endotrópicas en Jos suelos tropi cales y su importancia con relación a la disponibilidad de fósforo.Manejo de la infonnación. Si, como parece posible, el Programa de Fríjol del CIAT Uega a ser el centro mundial de germoplasma de Phaseolus vulgaris, se ría neo cesario mejorar el manejo y la recuperación de la información así como los sistemas de análisis de la misma. La información sobre el banco' de germoplasma puede ser una herramienta de gran utilidad, por ejemplo, para los estudios hechos en Austra• lia de Srylosanthes sp. (Burt et al., 1971). Los procedimientos que agilicen la se lec• ción son esenciales para disminuir el tiempo perdido al suministrar los pedidos de germoplasma .Estudios proteinicos. Dada la falta de énfasis que en la actualidad da el ClAT a la cantidad y calidad de la proteína, es esencial que otros centros comiencen estudios sobre las interacciones proteína~rendimiento. Este trabajo se está realizando, en parte, en la Universidad de Cambridge y en eIINCAP , en Guatemala.El acuerdo entre el CIAT y las. universidades de Cornell, Hokkaido y Michigan sirve para ilustrar la eficacia de la investigación cooperativa. El factor principal estudiado por estas universidades, bajo este acuerdo, es la fisiología básica del fríjol que comprende factores tales como la caída de las flores y el desarrollo de la vaina, la fotosíntesis de la vaina y su contribución al rendimiento, y las c'ausas de la inestabilidad en los hábitos ,de crecimiento del • fríjol.Bean lmprovement Cooperative. A,mual Repori. v. 5, 1962 . . ","tokenCount":"7994"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0701151090.json b/data/part_2/0701151090.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..67d84f531e2a886695e6fb4df81b1a38bd2e4d44 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0701151090.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"15b5e460666e7ec82ab69d773ce5c885","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/d8039e8f-cfcb-4630-9bf1-17e27309f65e/retrieve","id":"728045165"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"ebcef80f-65c8-4e9d-b669-765489414c91","pagecount":"53","content":"Grace conducted the literature review and wrote the draft report. Elisabetta Lambertini and Haley Swartz wrote portions of the report, reviewed drafts, and provided quality control. Elisabetta Lambertini provided input into the methodology and interpretation of findings. Caroline Smith DeWaal and Bonnie McClafferty reviewed and provided feedback on the full draft.Ethiopia bears a significant burden of foodborne disease (FBD). As in other African countries, traditional markets play a vital role in suppling food to Ethiopian consumers. However, little if any oversight exists to monitor the safety of foods sold at those markets. Conditions at the market itself could contribute to food contamination, for example due to inadequate infrastructure, vending practices, or poor environmental health. Feed the Future's EatSafe: Evidence and Action Towards Safe, Nutritious Food (EatSafe) undertook a comprehensive two-part review of the published literature to synthesize existing evidence on the occurrence of biological and chemical hazards in foods and beverages in Ethiopia.This report is organized in three parts: Section 1 presents objectives and methodology, while Sections 2 and 3 present findings on hazard occurrence in food and beverages, respectively. Section 2 details findings from recent literature review efforts, synthesizing 97 articles published from 1990 to 2021 on chemical and biological hazards detected in foods sold and consumed in Ethiopia. Section 3 presents methods and findings of a new literature review conducted by EatSafe on beverage-borne hazards consumed in Ethiopia, covering 118 articles published from 2000 to 2021.Regarding hazard occurrence in foods (Section 2), 70% of included studies investigated the presence of bacterial hazards. In animal source foods, in particular the beef and dairy value chains, Salmonella spp., E. coli, and Staphylococcus aureus were documented most frequently. This level of attention seems justified by the high contamination prevalence observed, although there may be a bias likely due to the importance of these commodities in the Ethiopian food economy. Conversely, data are lacking on viral pathogens and parasites. While some studies found fresh vegetables to be highly contaminated with parasites and bacteria, comparatively little data was available for this commodity category, thus supporting the choice of fresh vegetables as a focus for EatSafe's activities. Only three studies reported on egg contamination.Regarding hazard occurrence in beverages (Section 3), 58% of included studies covered raw or pasteurized cow milk and camel milk. A quarter of records (28%) covered water, while 13% examined fruit juices. More biological hazards (n=469) than chemical hazards (n=70) were identified. Almost all (94%) biological hazards were bacteria, while a small portion were fungi and parasites (5% and 1%, respectively). Of the bacterial hazards, the most frequently reported were Escherichia coli (21%), Staphylococcus spp. (22%), and Salmonella spp. (11%). Antimicrobial residues, heavy metals, and pesticides were also reported by a small number of studies.In general, results from the reviews were compatible with disease burden estimates from the World Health Organization's Foodborne Disease Epidemiology Reference Group (FERG), the most credible global source of FBD burden estimates. Notably, Salmonella spp. and E. coli feature prominently in both the reviews and FERG estimates. However, certain hazards that the FERG considers high priority but are difficult to assess (e.g., Campylobacter spp.) are underreported in the reviews. Moreover, while the FERG did not consider S. aureus, this was one of the most reported bacteria in the reviews. This report represents an important step in gathering and synthesizing scientific evidence to inform upcoming EatSafe research activities and interventions to improve food safety in traditional markets in Ethiopia.Although access to safe food is a basic human right (1), foodborne diseases (FBD) continue to present significant global health challenges. FBD is caused by food that carries bacteria, viruses, parasites, foreign material, and chemicals that makes food unsafe for human consumption.The Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group (FERG), a World Health Organization (WHO) group of experts focused on FBD, provides the best estimates of the foodborne disease burden globally (2,3). Using global data on 31 foodborne hazards, the FERG estimates about 600 million people become sick each year and 420,000 die, resulting in an estimated FBD burden of 33 million Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs)(4). 1 A subsequent FERG study estimated a burden of over one million additional disease cases, 56,000 deaths, and nine million DALYs attributed to four foodborne heavy metals (i.e., arsenic, cadmium, lead, and methylmercury) (5). Additional detail on bacterial, viral, and chemical disease agents from the FERG studies are in Table 1. Regionally, the FERG found that for two of the four heavy metals listed above, Africa sub-region E 2 had the top two highest FBD burden per capita. Ethiopia, the focus of this report, belongs to that sub-region. As shown in Table 1, the top five hazards as per DALY burden are biological. While non-typhoidal Salmonella ranks highest in terms of DALYs and deaths, Campylobacter spp. and norovirus rank first and second in illness numbers -reflecting frequent but less severe illnesses.Feed the Future's Evidence and Action Towards Safe, Nutritious Food (EatSafe) aims to improve food safety in traditional food markets by focusing on the consumer. This report presents the existing body of evidence on the occurrence of foodborne hazards in foods and beverages commonly consumed in Ethiopia. In conjunction with other research studies, this report will inform the design of EatSafe's consumer-facing interventions in Ethiopia. 3 This report is organized in two parts:• Section 2 on Hazards in Foods, which synthesizes results from a review of foodborne hazards in Ethiopia from 1990 to 2021 (3); • Section 3 on Hazards in Beverages, which presents the results of a new review of beverage-borne hazards in Ethiopia from 2000 to 2021.The following research questions grounded both reviews:• What biological and chemical hazards have been identified in foods and beverages consumed in Ethiopia? • What is the prevalence (i.e., percent of contaminated products) and concentration of hazards in foods and beverages consumed in Ethiopia? • What is the spatial distribution of studies reporting these hazards (i.e., where, within the country, were the studies conducted)?EatSafe consortium partner ILRI previously conducted a systematic literature review covering a broad range of foodborne hazards in Ethiopia, including evidence from 1990-2 Countries in this sub-region include: Botswana; Burundi; Central African Republic; Congo; Côte d'Ivoire; Democratic Republic of the Congo; Eritrea; Ethiopia; Kenya; Lesotho; Malawi; Mozambique; Namibia; Rwanda; South Africa; Swaziland; Uganda; United Republic of Tanzania; Zambia; Zimbabwe. Note these countries are classified in the same sub-region based on similar levels of mortality, as Africa sub-region E corresponds to high child and very high adult mortality. 3 In particular, this review will inform the choice of specific hazard(s) and commodities that will be included in EatSafe risk assessment activities in Ethiopia.A second supplemental review was conducted to identify more recently published articles, covering 2017-2021. This section summarizes findings from both searches. The search protocol for the systematic review is detailed in (3), and the supplemental search used the same methods. Data was extracted from 97 articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria and met acceptable quality standards.Of the 97 articles selected for data extraction, the vast majority (70%) investigated the presence of bacterial hazards (Figure 1), followed by 20% on parasites. Only a minority of articles addressed viruses or chemical hazards. The distribution of bacterial hazards, in terms of percent of articles, is shown in Figure 2. In terms of value chains, bovine dairy and beef were the most studied. The focus on these two value chains is possibly a reflection of the importance of livestock in Ethiopian food systems, and of funding to support research on them.More recent results from the supplemental search confirm these hazard prevalence rates. While gaps in several hazards and commodities remain, EatSafe identified an increase in published literature for vegetables from 2017 to 2021.The most investigated and detected hazards are pathogenic bacteria (Figure 2). While each species or subspecies results in different clinical presentations, most can cause acute gastroenteric illness, often including diarrhoea and associated complications, as well as numerous long-term sequelae of infection. Several of these pathogens are estimated to cause the highest burden among FBD, worldwide and in the Africa subregion AFR-E including Ethiopia (2). Among chemical hazards, long-term exposure to aflatoxins can lead to carcinogenicity, in particular liver cancer, immunotoxicity, and growth impairment, as well as acute liver toxicity in extreme cases (6).The following sections presents results by value chain.Six articles investigating microbial contamination in the bovine dairy products value chain (excluding milk and yogurt, covered in the beverage review) were identified, covering four bacterial pathogens and one suspect pathogen (Mycobacterium). Five hazards were identified in various stages of the Ethiopian bovine dairy value chain: Staphylococcus, Listeria, Bacillus cereus, Salmonella, and Mycobacterium. 4 Staphylococcus spp. -This pathogen enters the dairy production chain when it is shed in milk by cows. The likelihood that cows shed S. aureus varies based on geographical location and farming systems but is closely related to hygiene practices during milk handling. While five studies investigated the occurrence of S. aureus in bovine milk, and found a prevalence ranging from 7% to 50% at multiple stage of the milk production and processing chain (7-10); see Section 3), no study investigated the presence of this pathogen in cheese or other dairy foods.Listeria spp. -Studies in Addis Ababa identified Listeria spp. in ice cream (43% of samples), cheese (0%-4%), and cottage cheese (2%-5%) (11)(12)(13)(14). In a different study, cheese was found to be highly contaminated with the hazard (60%), more so than raw milk (19%) and yogurt (5%) (15). While pasteurization will kill this bacterium, 20% of pasteurized milk samples still contained this pathogen, likely due to cross-contamination during processing (15). Bacillus cereus -Over 60% of ayib samples (an Ethiopian traditional cheese) sold at a traditional market were contaminated with Bacillus cereus (11). Salmonella spp. -In supermarkets and retail shops located in Gondar, Salmonella spp. was not detected in cottage cheese samples (16). For context, over 10% of individuals working in Addis Ababa dairy farms were found positive for Salmonella (10).Mycobacterium spp. -No study investigated the presence of this genus in bovine dairy products other than milk. A large study involving cattle (n=1,220) found Mycobacterium tuberculosis (15%), M. bovis (44%) and atypical mycobacteria (39%) in 4 Mycobacterium spp. is of primary importance for animal health and only a suspect human pathogen.Because the foodborne hazard review excludes milk, it is mentioned here for completeness. However, the three articles described in the Mycobacterium sub-section are excluded from the number of studies in the foodborne hazard review, instead included in the beverage review (Section 3). milk from tuberculin-positive cows (17). Two other studies found that 8%-18% of tuberculin sensitive cows were shedding M. bovis or M. tuberculosis in milk (11%) (18,19). 5 BEEF Because consumption of raw beef meat is common in Ethiopia, the presence of foodborne pathogens is particularly relevant to this value chain. A total of 23 studies investigated microbial contamination in the beef value chain. Salmonella spp. -Salmonella was detected in 12% of raw meat samples, 8% of minced meat samples, and 3% of raw burger samples (16). In another study, only two of 200 (1%) beef samples were positive for Salmonella spp. (20). Salmonella was observed in raw beef products at a prevalence ranging from 2% to 26% in abattoirs, and 4% to 70% in retail (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26).Listeria spp. -Approximately half of 61 minced beef meat samples analyzed in one study (14) were positive for Listeria spp., and one of these positive samples was confirmed as L. monocytogenes (14). Another study found a 28% prevalence of Listeria spp. Four percent of beef samples contained L. monocytogenes, which has higher rates of antimicrobial resistance (27).Eight studies examined the prevalence of E. coli in beef samples. One study found a E. coli O157 prevalence of 8% in meat samples from abattoirs and butcher shops in Addis Ababa (28). Six recent articles investigated the presence of generic E. coli in raw beef meat or carcasses in the Oromia region. Prevalence in raw beef meat products sampled at abattoirs or retail ranged from 19% to 45%, with the highest prevalence observed at retail (22,29,30). In particular, prevalence of E.coli O157:H7 ranged from 1% to 19% at abattoirs and retail. (29)(30)(31)(32). One study focusing E.coli O157:H7 on carcass swabs at processing plants (including skin, intestinal, and fecal swabs) found a much lower prevalence of 1-2%, possibly due to the sampling method used, or to the processing plant exhibiting a higher degree of food safety controls than other establishments (33). Shigella spp. -A study involving butcher shops in Gondar town isolated Shigella in 9% of raw meat samples. Contamination was also reported in swabs of chopping boards (13%), hands (11%), and knives (11%) (34).Staphylococcus aureus -S. aureus was identified in 12% to 25% of raw beef products in abattoirs (7,22) and in half of butcher shop beef samples (35). In another study on environmental samples in abattoirs, four knife and slaughter line swab samples tested positive for S. aureus, as did all hand swabs (7). Assessing concentrations in raw beef samples collected at urban butcher shops, one study found a mean of 4 Log CFU/g, considered unacceptably high (21).Mycobacterium bovis -In one study, 6% of carcasses were found positive for M. bovis upon postmortem examination (36). The study also found poor agreement between routine and detailed abattoir inspection, and well as between results of inspection and culture detection, with 14% of carcasses harboring mycobacteria that were not detected by the detailed abattoir inspection. While Mycobacterium spp. is of primary importance for animal health, it is a suspect human pathogen and included here for completeness.EGGS Four studies on eggs were identified. A study in Addis Ababa found that 5% of raw shell egg samples were positive for Salmonella enteritidis (n=384) (37). In another study, 18% (n=50) of raw egg samples were found positive for Salmonella spp. (16). Finally, Salmonella was also detected in one out of 30 egg sandwich samples (38). One study found a somewhat higher prevalence of Salmonella in eggs sold at markets (4-5%) than in eggs collected at farms (0-2%) (39).FRUITS AND VEGETABLES A total of six studies on fresh vegetables were identified (see Table 2). Most studies focused on parasites -unlike for other commodities -and only one study investigated bacteria. No study examined viral occurrence, highlighting a key gap in evidence on foodborne hazards and risk.Parasites -Four studies investigated the presence of parasites in fruits and vegetables. One study found that half of the 36 fruit and vegetable sampled tested positive for at least one parasite, and of those testing positive, half were contaminated with two parasite species (40). 6 Contamination rates differed by product type, and included 71% of tomatoes, 67% of kale (Brassica oleracea), 62% of carrots, 60% of lettuce (Lactuca serriola), 49% of bananas, 40% of mangoes, and 38% of avocado samples. Two other small-scale studies confirmed the prevalence levels observed for individual parasites. However, one large recent study found a relatively lower prevalence of some parasites in multiple vegetable sampled at markets in Bahir Dar City (41).Bacterial contamination -Varying levels of microbial contamination were identified in fruits and vegetables. In one study of lettuce and green peppers (each n=40), Salmonella was detected in 10% of samples and Shigella in 30% (100% and 97% penicillin-resistant, respectively), in addition to coliform counts above 4 Log CFU/g in 48% and 35% of lettuce and green pepper samples, respectively (42). In the same study, 80% of samples had high Staphylococcus counts (between 4 and 6 Log CFU/g). A different study examined the presence of E. coli O157:H7 in lettuce sold at Addis Ababa markets found a relatively low (0.5%) prevalence (43). In one study examining mycotoxins, ochratoxin was the most frequently identified hazard, isolated in teff (27%; n=33), wheat (23%; n=107), sorghum (22%; n=78) and barley (26%; n=103) (45). Aflatoxin B1 was found in teff (23%; n=35) and barley (11%; n=115), while deoxynivalenol was identified in 90% of sorghum (n=33) and 35% of barley (n=20) samples (45).Aflatoxin prevalence ranged from 23% to 41% in samples of groundnut seeds and locally produced groundnut cake (halawa) over two consecutive crop seasons (n=80 in each year) 7 (46). Beyond groundnut products, another study of mycotoxin contamination in maize from farms in south and southwest Ethiopia found high concentrations 8 of Zearalenone compounds, Fumonisins B1-B4, and Aflatoxin B1 (47).In another study, all samples of maize consumed were contaminated with Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), at a mean concentration of 1.8 mg/kg (48). Specifically, over three-quarters of maize samples for human consumption collected from households at three sites contained levels above the standards set by the European Union and/or the Codex Alimentarius (i.e., maximum residue levels for DDT/DDE in maize 0.05 and 0.1 mg Kg -1 respectively) (49,50), highlighting the potential risk when maize is used as an ingredient in complementary foods. This study also investigated organochlorine and organophosphate pesticide residues in other cereal crops (sorghum, millet, rice). 7 Concentration levels in both products combined ranged from 1.7 to 2,526 μg kg -1 for B1, and from 0.1 to 237 μg kg -1 for B2. 8 Prevalence of Aflatoxin B1 was 8% (mean concentration of 606 μg kg -1 ), 51% to 70% for Fumonisins B1-B4 (mean concentrations of 85-606 μg kg -1 ), and 81% to 96% for Zearalenone compounds.The findings on contamination levels of the review, presented in the previous section, was consistent with estimates of disease attribution to different commodity categories in the FERG estimates, for the Africa sub-region E including Ethiopia (4). In particular nontyphoidal Salmonella, one of the most important bacteria in terms of public health, was studied in numerous publications in Ethiopia (and elsewhere). However, viruses were under-represented and chemicals over-represented in the publications identified by the review, compared to FDB burden attributed to them in the FERG estimates. This highlights that viruses are relatively understudied compared to their estimated burden.The high representation of chemical hazards in the published literature is possibly an indication of increased funding for research targeting them. The review also searched for and identified publications on important foodborne pathogens that were not included in the FERG study (e.g., Staph. aureus and Bacillus cereus). It should be kept in mind that hazard occurrence data cannot be directly linked to disease burden without a proper risk assessment effort. Hence, no comparison is drawn here between frequency of hazard occurrence reported in the literature and disease burden estimated by FERG.EatSafe conducted a systematic literature review focused on peer-reviewed articles published from 2000 to 2021 that examined consumption of beverages (including water) in rural and urban communities in Ethiopia. The review followed PRISMA guidelines. 9 Appendix 1 presents the review protocol, including inclusion and exclusion criteria. The search process for this review followed the same approach for a similar EatSafe in Nigeria review on foodborne and beverage-borne hazards consumed in Nigeria (51).Given the scarce literature on hazards in Ethiopia, hazard proxies are also included (i.e., the broader categories of pathogens that have a subset of hazards). For example, more studies on E. coli exist compared to toxigenic E. coli, although many E. coli strains are non-pathogenic. Similarly, bacteria that cause opportunistic human infections (e.g., Alcaligenes spp.,) were included. Moreover, some of these bacteria are also spoilage organisms, and while not the direct focus of the study, presence of spoilage organisms is important when planning interventions, as preventing spoilage is a major incentive for value chain actors.Data extraction and quality assessment happened concurrently, using the same quality assessment methods from the Nigeria review (i.e., three quality categories including good, medium, poor for each inclusion criterion, assessed by two Reviewers). To capture data from the studies included in this review, EatSafe used the same data extraction template developed for previous Nigeria review (see Table 3 for types of extracted data). 10 A total of 512 studies were retained for full text screening; of these, data were extracted from 118 publications. A summary of these data is provided in Appendix 2. The included studies yielded a total of 539 unique hazard records. Throughout this section, the number of records is used as the primary unit of information, in addition to the number of articles on a commodity/hazard pair. Because a \"record\" refers to the information about a commodity/hazard included in an article, an article may include multiple records (e.g., if the study targeted several hazards).During the 20-year time period studied, there has been an increase in the number of published articles focusing on food safety in Ethiopia (see Figure 3) 11 -a trend mirrored in the EatSafe review on this topic in Nigeria (51).Most studies focused on four regions within Ethiopia, with the highest in Amhara, followed by Oromia, Addis Ababa, and Tigray (Figure 4). Clarifying why these areas are more prevalent in the literature was beyond the remit of this review, though large urban areas may have dominated study settings more than rural settings. Sidama, the region where Hawassa is located, was considered in six articles (nine records). TYPES OF BEVERAGES Excluding alcoholic beverages, 514 records on beverages included cow and camel milk (58%), water (28%), and fruit juices (13%). 12 (Figure 5). Milk records (n=296) included raw milk (88%) and fermented milk (12%). Water surveys (n=142) were from tap water (55%), surface water (22%), ground water (18%), and bottled water (5%). 12 The remaining 1% were studies examining energy drinks and were excluded from this review. The review found both biological (n=469 records) and chemical (n=70) hazards, out of the 539 records included in the review.Of the records on biological hazards or hazard proxies reported (n=469), 94% were bacteria, 5% were fungi, and 1% were parasites. Sixty-seven (15%) of the bacterial strains investigated were not hazards per se but rather provided indication of contamination or were broader categories of bacteria that also include pathogenic strains (total bacterial counts, coliforms, Enterobacteriaceae etc.). Also included for completeness are hazards that cause rare, opportunistic human infections such as Alcaligenes spp., and Erwinia spp. These organisms do not usually cause infections in healthy individuals, but can infect persons with compromised immune system responses, e.g. due to other infections or severe malnutrition. Of the 303 records that reported bacterial hazards, E. coli (21%), Staphylococcus spp. (22%), and Salmonella spp. (11%) were the most frequently reported (Figure 6). Although not covered in depth in the review, resistance to commonly used antibiotics was reported in some studies. For instance, E. coli isolated from fruit juice showed resistance to antibiotics such as clindamycin (80% of isolates), ampicillin (70%), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (60%), erythromycin (60%), chloramphenicol (50%), and kanamycin (50%) (57). In a different fruit juice study, a high proportion of E.coli isolates were found resistant to erythromycin (100%), ceftriaxone (67%), tetracycline (67%), ciprofloxacin (60%), and chloramphenicol (50%) (77). In the same study, all S. aureus isolates showed resistance to erythromycin and amoxclavulic acid, and a high proportion were resistant to other antimicrobials including 18% to tetracycline, 59% to ciprofloxacin, 41% to gentamicin, and 65% to chloramphenicol (77).Bovine dairy products are very often found to be contaminated by bacterial pathogens at various stages in production chains. This section summarizes evidence on prevalence of different pathogens, organized by beverage type (i.e., raw milk, pasteurized and raw milk combined, and yogurt).Milk -A diverse group of bacterial hazards and pathogens were found in both raw and pasteurized milk. While 20% of samples were positive for L. monocytogenes (9%), L. innocua (7%), and L. seeligeri (3%) in one study (n=407) (52), another found a 34% and 3% positivity rate for E. coli and E. coli O157:H7, respectively (n=380) (54) raw milk samples (n=30) (53), as well as 20% of pasteurized milk samples containing Listeria, likely due to cross-contamination during processing (15). At the household level, rates of E. coli in raw milk ranged from 21% to 55% in two districts of the Oromia Region of Ethiopia (80).In a recent study conducted in the Gondar region, almost all raw and pasteurized milk samples (95%) collected at milking, transport, processing, pasteurization, and retail levels were positive for gram-positive bacteria, including Staphylococcus spp, Bacillus cereus, and others (59). At the retail level, E. coli prevalence ranged from 63% in milk shops to 31% at dairy farms (57). Data on overall bacterial counts indicated significant contamination in milk samples across retail locations in Ethiopia: higher rates among street vendors compared to milk farmers (54,55), lower rates in cooperatives as compared to farmers ( 56), and higher rates in homes and cafeterias as opposed to dairy farms and vending shops (81).Yogurt -Fermented milk products, in particular ergo and yogurt, were investigated by 12 studies, most of them in Oromia, Amhara, or Addis Ababa, with sample sizes ranging from 18 to 200. One study was conducted in Hawassa (69). Ergo, a cultured milk product, is produced at different conditions than yogurt, but the two products are considered as one category by several authors. Ergo or yogurt were found to be contaminated by Staphylococcus aureus at a 3-46% prevalence range (62,63,66) while it was not detected in a small-scale study where other Staphylococci were detected (n=20) (64). Concentrations of Staphylococcus spp. were not always assessed, but two studies found an average of 5.5 Log CFU/ml (69) and 8.6 Log CFU/ml (67). Listeria spp. was detected in 4-10% of yogurt samples (15,65) and L. monocytogenes in 5% (n=20) (15). When different products were compared, yogurt was contaminated at a lower frequency than cheese for both Listeria and Staphylococcus (15,62), and sometimes more (15) and sometimes less than raw milk (62) While several studies investigated E. coli or coliform bacteria as hygiene indicators (66,67,69,70) only one study investigate the occurrence of pathogenic E.coli O157:H7, without detecting it in yogurt (n=18), while it was detected in raw cow and camel milk (66).In terms of chemical hazards, one study (61) detected aflatoxin AFM1 in yogurt, at concentrations potentially posing health risk to children, but lower than for milk, cottage cheese, and butter.CAMEL MILK Salmonella spp. positivity rates in camel milk (n=24) varied based on value chain stage, ranging from 66% by producers, 83% in wholesalers, and 100% at retail (71). Another study found a prevalence of 90% for Staphylococcus spp., 54% for Streptococcus spp., 32% for E. coli, and 18% for Salmonella spp. (72). Staphylococcus had the highest prevalence at production, while Streptococcus prevalence increased from production to market (a trend also observed in coliform levels).WATER, BY REGION Microbial contamination has been observed in a range of water sources throughout the country. The microbial targets most often investigated are bacterial indicators of fecal contamination. This section summarizes evidence of microbial contamination in water used for drinking purposes and is organized by region. No evidence was identified from Sidama, the region where the city of Hawassa is located. Of the two neighboring regions, Oromia and the Southern Nations, some information is available for Oromia.Oromia Region -Households water sources in the Oromia Region of Ethiopia had E. coli in 55% of studied samples (80). Three-quarters of river water samples and dug well water in Oromia did not comply with WHO guidelines for human drinking water standards, including E. coli contamination (73). 13 However, samples had higher positivity rates in the rainy season as compared to the dry season. Amhara Region -Water samples from southern parts of Lake Tana in the Bahir Dar area contained the following pathogens: total coliforms (100%), Clostridium perfringens (90%), fecal coliforms (86%), and E. coli (82%) (82). Another study from Bahir Dar City found lower prevalence rates with samples from springs, reservoirs, and taps within households including total coliforms (21%), fecal coliforms (19%) and E. coli (18%) (83). In particular, E.coli was detected in 100% of spring water (n=4), 20% of reservoir water samples (n=10), and 17% of tap water (n=126) samples (83).Somali Region -In Jigjiga City, water from household containers, pipeline, and reservoirs found contamination rates of 52% for E. coli, and rates of 6% to 8% for Shigella spp, Salmonella, and Vibrio spp, while half of household and pipeline water samples were positive for fecal coliforms (74). In particular, E. coli was detected in 55% (n=60) of household samples, and 30% (n=30), 80% (n=15), and 67% (n=15) of pipeline, reservoir, and \"beyollie\" (donkey cart water vendor) respectively (74). Tigray Region -Parasites, including Giardia spp and Cryptosporidium spp, were identified in Tigray water sources (76).North Gondar Zone -Over 70% of samples from urban and rural parts of the North Gondar Zone were positive for indicator bacteria, including 50% of fecal coliforms and 35% positive for E. coli (75).The primary hazards identified in fresh fruit juices, including avocado, mango, papaya, and guava juices sold at cafés and juice houses include S. aureus (contamination rates ranging 12% to 42%), Shigella spp (20% to 85%), Salmonella spp (20% to 57%), and E. coli (7% to 60%), though contamination rates varied based on the type of fruit drink and geographic location (57,77-79).Seventy records reported on chemical hazards (13% of 539 records): heavy metals (44 records), pesticides (10), minerals (8), aflatoxins (4), and antimicrobial residues and nitrates (each 2 records). This section contains a smaller number of records than for microbial hazards and includes both drinking water sources and milk.Aflatoxin -Bovine milk samples taken from dairy farmers in and around Addis Ababa City contained aflatoxin contamination in 26% of samples (84). In Bishoftu town, 100% of milk samples (n=108) from both industry and local producers had aflatoxin, as did yogurt samples (n=93) (61).Antibiotic Residues -Twelve percent of milk samples from Nazareth dairy farms tested positive for Oxytetracycline and penicillin G (83% and 16% of samples tested above the recommended limit, respectively) (85). Organochlorine pesticide residues were identified in human and cow milk samples collected from South-West Ethiopia (86). Tests on drinking water samples from reservoirs and wells in Jimma City and the water treatment plant that supplies Addis Ababa, identified levels of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, malathion, diazinon, and Pirimiphos-methyl (87).Heavy Metals -In Tigray, river water samples tested for eight heavy metals were all above the respective WHO limit, including zinc (100% of samples), iron (76%), cobalt (76%), lead (64%), cadmium (44%), nickel (44%), chromium (40%), and copper (16%) (88). Another study did not find cadmium and cobalt in the tap water samples after testing, though iron, manganese, and lead levels were higher than recommended (89). Assessing the suitability of flood water for drinking, among other uses, found lead concentration levels above the WHO standard (90). Water from Lake Beseka in Oromia contained lead, cadmium, arsenic, and iron concentration levels above WHO guideline limits (91).Fluoride -Three-quarters of river water samples and dug well water in the Oromia region did not comply with WHO guidelines for human drinking water standards, including due to high fluoride concentrations (80).The two systematic review efforts presented here, synthesizing over 20 years of evidence on hazard occurrence in foods and beverages in Ethiopia, contribute to evidence-based and risk-based design of food safety interventions. The evidence points to medium-high frequency of contamination in a wide variety of foods and beverages, covering a broad range of hazards and across multiple points in the supply chains, from production to retail. Overall, the data paint a picture of widespread contamination affecting a broad range of food supply chains. The hazards detected can be transferred to food from humans, animals, or the environment. Hence, a One Health systemic approach, programmatically accounting for multiple routes of transmission (human, animal, environmental) appears warranted.The studies covered 11 of 13 Ethiopian regions, to varying degrees; however, only a limited number of studies were conducted in Sidama, the region where the city of Hawassa -EatSafe's study site-is located (these were six studies on biological hazards in milk and fermented milk, identified by the beverage review).Traditional markets, while playing a key role in the accessibility, quality, and safety of foods, were generally not explicitly targeted in hazard studies. However, several studies investigated foods or beverages at multiple stages along their supply chain, including at retail. For example, the studies of milk and some dairy products, where contamination was detected more frequently, included evaluation points from production to retail. This review is extremely useful to identify critical points where interventions could be beneficial and highlights the value of \"farm to fork\" interventions that engage multiple supply chain actors, including markets, to manage food safety hazards.Access to safe water is critical to improving the health of a population. It is also vital for safe food handling practices. Fecal contamination of drinking water can result in crosscontamination of food or food-contact surfaces, since water is frequently used in food washing and preparation, in addition to drinking. The widespread detection of E. coli and coliforms in Ethiopian drinking water sources suggests many water sources have been contaminated with feces -confirming the known fecal-oral route of transmission of many waterborne and foodborne pathogens (92). In addition, the detection of Salmonella points to the likely role of animals as contributors to water contamination, and to the role of water in the transmission of zoonotic foodborne pathogens. Similarly, the occurrence of parasites that share human and animal hosts, such as Giardia spp. and Cryptosporidium spp., in water highlights the need to account for both human and animal ecologies in the design of food safety interventions.The body of evidence on chemical contaminants is scarcer than for biological hazards. Only few high-quality studies involved pesticides and aflatoxins in grains, nuts, or seeds, while none was identified in fresh fruits or vegetables. Comparatively, more studies on chemical hazards were identified for beverages, covering aflatoxins and antibiotic residues in milk, and heavy metals in drinking water sources (also potentially used to produce some beverages). However, some findings emerged: surface water may be contaminated with pesticides from nearby agricultural areas and from household application (87) which may also have persisted in the environment. Heavy metals can enter food value chains through many routes, most commonly via environmental contamination (93). The detection of this type of contaminants signals the need for systemic environmental health interventions.The information compiled through these reviews also highlights several limitations in the available body of evidence. For instance, some hazards and commodities are clearly more studied than others. Bacterial hazards are reasonably well studied in the dairy and beef supply chains. However, data on viruses and parasites are missing. Conversely, fresh fruits and vegetables are not well studied, with only two studies (one on parasites, one on bacteria) identified by the review. This key gap supports the choice of fresh vegetables as focus commodity category for EatSafe's work. Heavy metals, the top hazard category in terms of FERG burden estimates in the sub-region including Ethiopia (5), have been investigated only in water. In addition, data are in the vast majority of studies reported as prevalence, while concentration levels are not measured. Concentrations are more often measured for chemical hazards, at least in terms of exceedance of an established threshold, while concentration is most often not measured for microbial hazards. This gap greatly hinders the ability to use these data for risk assessment purposes, hence limiting their usefulness.Prioritizing interventions to control food safety hazards can lead to better use of scarce resources in many countries including Ethiopia (3). However, evidence-based FBD risk prioritization processes are needed to allocate resources effectively. The processes for conducting risk rankings are becoming available (94) but supporting data and the organizational capabilities to effectively implement them is often lacking. Food safety tends to capture national attention only when there is a crisis (95), especially one that is likely to result in a major public health issue or have a negative economic impact (2). Also, risk perception is often misaligned with actual risk. Diseases that most elicit fear in the population, including those that may cause a high individual burden or that are due to novel hazards, are usually regarded as more important by stakeholders, and even experts, than those that are much more common but more familiar or less dramatic in their manifestations (3). Data on hazard occurrence along food and beverage value chains, combined with risk assessment to estimate the burden that could be expected from such occurrence, are needed to effectively prioritize how to allocate the limited resources. Ideally, risk assessment estimates (prospective) are complementary to disease surveillance data (retrospective). Disease surveillance data collection, especially when it includes disease attribution to specific hazards, can enable early detection of disease outbreaks and can be used to assess burden trends over time. These time trends provide evidence for the need of interventions, and help assess whether national-scale interventions are working. However, surveillance systems in many developing countries face a number of challenges including weak laboratory capacities and scarce resources (96,97) and have received minimal support in public health planning. Hence, in these cases, hazard occurrence and risk assessment approaches provide the best and sometimes only rigorous way to estimate the need for, and impact of interventions. The comprehensive body of evidence presented here enables this crucial assessment and highlights gaps that hinder it.Multiple hazards were found to be present in varying frequencies in a broad range of foods and beverages commonly consumed in Ethiopia. From a food safety perspective this raises concern over the possible threat to public health, and merits further attention. Although a review such as this one helps gauge the prevalence of hazards which consumers may be exposed to, by itself it is not sufficient to inform risk management decisions. Data on hazard occurrence is, however, a key step in the risk assessment process -a process that includes hazard characterization, exposure assessment, and risk characterization.In both the foodborne and beverage-borne reviews, most completed studies have not been done in systematic ways, and many are based on small sample sizes. They also tend to focus on hazards that are easy to detect, possibly due to limited laboratory resources. Further, a disproportionate number of studies were conducted in large towns or capital areas. Nationally representative samples are absent, and hazard proxies were often examined rather than the hazards themselves. Therefore, comparing or aggregating studies is difficult. Nonetheless, it is clear that common, detrimental hazards are very high in food and beverages consumed in Ethiopia, leading to an almost certain conclusion of a high burden of FBD -a conclusion consistent with findings from the FERG.Valuable insights emerge from the review synthesizing evidence on foodborne hazards in Ethiopia, including: • Across commodities, bacterial hazards are the most studied (70%), but not in all commodities; parasites were the focus of some studies (20%), particularly on fresh fruits and vegetables, while only a minority of studies addressed viruses or chemical hazards. • The beef value chain is the most intensely studied commodity, in particular for bacterial hazards.• Few studies focused on eggs or cheese, and all assessed bacterial contamination as the most common hazard found in these products.• Few studies on microbial contamination in fresh vegetables were identified, the majority investigated parasites, with a few for bacteria, and none for viruses. • Several studies measured contamination at multiple nodes of a supply chain, including retail, providing actionable evidence on potential control points. In particular contamination in some supply chains was observed to increase going from production to retail. While we cannot readily draw conclusions on trends along the supply chain without a meta-analysis, such trends would support the argument that significant risk reduction could be achieved in the later stages of the chain, including at markets. • While the reasons for the strong focus on assessing bacterial contamination are not known, this focus is consistent with FERG estimates that bacteria are the leading cause of foodborne disease in the African region that includes Ethiopia.The novel review on hazards detected in beverages adds an important dimension to currently available evidence on foodborne contamination. Key insights include:• Studies reviewed had a strong geographical bias, with some areas in the country being poorly represented.• Recent trends show an increase in literature published on hazards in beverages in Ethiopia. • Overall, bacterial hazards were the most commonly investigated. Other hazards appeared less frequently in the literature despite some of them carrying important health implications, e.g. heavy metals. Evidence on parasitic hazards is lacking. • Milk is fairly well studied, while evidence is lacking for other beverages.• The high contamination levels observed in water can be seen as a proxy for the level of environmental contamination in an area, with repercussions on foods grown and processed there.• Contamination in water also highlights the importance of applying a One Health approach for food safety interventions, given the animal and human sources of water contamination. • Given the home-made, traditional nature of some of the beverages studied in this review, care must be taken to identify and engage stakeholder in informal value chains.Across all studies, and also considering the FERG burden estimates, the most important foodborne hazards appear to be Salmonella, enterotoxigenic E. coli, and Campylobacter spp. with probable additions of Staphylococcus spp., lead, and Listeria. Other hazards may be equally or more problematic but are not represented in published studies.This review will inform the choice of specific hazard(s) and commodities to target in EatSafe's risk assessment activity in Ethiopia. Through the risk modelling process, the risk associated with consumption of selected foods will be determined, and potential mitigation steps identified and discussed.These reviews have outlined food hazard occurrence in beverages and foods in Ethiopia, based on past research. Based on the results of this activity, , we recommend that EatSafe considers the following points while planning for the risk assessment (Activity ET 1.6) that informs intervention design:• Several hazard types were reported in the review, many not in the list of priorities determined by FERG. This might suggest a (potential focus on the \"trivial many\" rather than the \"vital few\" in the literature, which can be misleading. • Although the study provides a comprehensive overview of the status of hazards occurrence in foods and beverages in Ethiopia, it is not, on its own, sufficient to inform food safety prioritization decisions; these data can, however, contribute to risk assessment and risk ranking efforts. • Fresh fruits and vegetables are not well studied. This key gap supports the choice of fresh vegetables as focus commodity category for EatSafe's work.• Other important data gaps include viral pathogens, parasites, and eggs.• No clear evidence exists to assess the role of market practices or infrastructure in either hazard control or enabling/exacerbating contamination.• The vast majority of studies did not measure concentration, only presence/absence (summarized as prevalence, i.e. frequency of detection). This key gap hinders the usefulness of these data for risk assessment.• Where possible, the risk assessment modeling should utilize primary data collected within the project, due to significant gaps in the literature. • Overall, the widespread bacterial contamination observed in a broad range of foods and beverages points to the likely role of environmental and zoonotic transmission, which calls for a One Health systemic approach.","tokenCount":"7090"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0703078523.json b/data/part_2/0703078523.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8019bc3ed1fb271e3644e34f7864c405db8e1833 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0703078523.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"150e42aadff58f2f2eae324f2ffc1772","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/9e09fc79-49ec-4b6b-b328-ea97fdc7f24b/retrieve","id":"1883399717"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"77165d0a-fdc7-4ca3-a6dc-2896b954b3ee","pagecount":"57","content":"Three dimensional image of evapotranspiration in center pivot irrigation systems (by courtesy of the DLO-Winand Staring Center, Netherlands). Each center pivot system is 110 meters in diameter. The pivot system located in the center of the image is working correctly as the area of evapotranspiration shows a uniform depth, surface, and color. In the pivot system slightly below and to the right of that, the area of evapotranspiration shows an uneven depth, surface, and color, suggesting stunted crop growth due either to inadequate water delivery, poor cultivation practices, or to environmental problems. The pattern of evapotranspiration illustrated by the peaks plotted along the bottom right hand corner of the image demostrates vegetable cultivation with alternated irrigated fields receiving water from a surface water irrigation method.Remote sensing interpretation of evapotranspiration in center pivot irrigation systems in Castilla la Mancha (Spain). The box defines the area illustrated in the 3-dimentional image of evapotranspiration shown on the front cover of this report (by courtesy of the DLO-Winand Staring Center, Netherlands).To meet the challenge posed by the growing scarcity and competition for water, a new paradigm of water resource management is emerging from the work of IIMI and others. This paradigm has two components. First, there is a movement away from the old paradigm of classical efficiency of water use at the local levelfields or irrigation systemsto the concept of increasing the water productivity of the whole water resource system, that is, at the level of entire river basins. Sometimes, the productivity of water at the river basin level can be increased by increasing the classical efficiency, or water use at the local level and, sometimes, it can be increased by decreasing classical efficiency. The difference between the two lies mainly in determining the use of the drainage water from the irrigation system or from other water users. If, for example, the water draining from the system flows to sinks (deep aquifers or the sea), then improving the efficiency of the system will improve the efficiency of the whole basin. On the other hand, if the drainage water from the field or system is used by farmers further downstream, either directly or through recharge of aquifers, then improving the efficiency of the system may not lead to efficiency in the basin as the drainage flows to them will be reduced. This raises the second component of the paradigm. To determine these flows, we need more sophisticated means of observing, measuring, and inferring these water flows in both surface and subsurface areas. The rapid advances currently being made in information technologies are coming to our aid. Satellite remote sensing and geographical information systems are enabling us to measure these flows at river basin level. By using these techniques crop yields for example, can be predicted through observation of evapotranspiration. This makes it possible to determine how well irrigation water is being managed.The front cover of this report illustrates the point that we wish to make, and what we believe is a dramatic breakthrough in this field. As explained in the image caption, using remote sensing techniques enables us to actually observe the evapotranspiration of crops. Since yields are a function of evapotranspiration, we can literally see in detail, over vast areas, how effectively we are managing irrigation. The usefulness of applying remote sensing in the assessment of the performance of an irrigation system is amply demonstrated by the first paper in this report.We believe that further development of this paradigm, combined with better understanding of the social, institutional, and economic aspects of water management, will result in dramatic increases in water productivity and equity of use. There are around 250 million hectares of irrigated land in the world with an estimated capital value of the irrigation facilities, in terms of replacement cost, of at least US$5,000 per hectare. The total capital value of these facilities is around US$1.250 trillion. It is our belief that the productivity of this asset can be increased by 25 percent or more. Given that much of the $300 billion gain can be used to substantially increase the welfare of poor and disadvantaged groups, the stakes, impacts, and rewards for investment in the field of water resource management are enormous.The IIMI ParadigmCan advanced technologies be used to successfully assess the productivity of irrigation water and the effectiveness of irrigation water management practices at a regional scale? This question was tested on the Sirsa Circle, Haryana State, northwestern India (figure 1) using satellite remote sensing (SRS) techniques, hydrological modeling, and geographical information systems (GIS).The Sirsa Circle uses the warabandi system for supplying water to the farmers. The warabandi distribution system, developed in the late nineteenth century, divides the area to be irrigated into three sectors. Every day water is distributed to each sector in turn. For 8 days each sector takes priority over the others, making the total distribution rotation of the warabandi system 24 days. The water courses receive water from the distributaries via ungated outlets at a fixed discharge. The schedule of water deliveries does not correspond with cropping patterns or groundwater development. Instead, farmers receive their share of water by rotation at fixed moments and flow rates in proportion to the size of their landholdings. The charges of irrigation water are based on the area actually irrigated. In Haryana, the canal system is designed to distribute a limited supply of water over the largest area of land and among the greatest number of farmers as possiblethe objective being to protect crop failure and prevent famine.The total area under cultivation in the Sirsa Circle is 385,799 hectares of which 281,340 hectares are irrigated. The irrigated area is divided into 84 administrative command areas. During the rabi (winter) season, November to May, when the total rainfall varies between 50 and 130 mm, farmers grow wheat, oilseed, and gram. The irrigation water allowance is designed to irrigate one third of each farmers cultivable area but is insufficient to meet the crop water requirements. The available water does however, prevent the crop from wilting.The agricultural conditions were assessed in 199596 using multi-temporal measurements by the Linear Imaging Scanner System (LISS-II) radiometer aboard an Indian Satellite (IRS-IB). The 30 m pixel size created a unique opportunity to study the geometry of the crop and irrigation intensity in relation to the detail of the canal network in the Sirsa Circle (figure 2). With the recent inclusion of all four spectral channels on the IRS, a new hybrid classification procedure was designed to classify crop types of similar spectral reflectances. Areas with known crop typesdetermined by field visits were first assigned on the images, and then the spectral signatures of the areas were extracted from three different images acquired during rabi 199596. A series of classification steps were performed and repeated until all the pixels were classified as wheat, oilseed, or other. Assuming that crops were only grown on the plots receiving irrigation water, the irrigation intensity could be inferred after identification of the wheat and oilseed.Composites of the spectral images from the IRS provided delineation of vegetative and non-vegetative surfaces. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) was calculated to monitor the crop development stages. The NDVI at crop heading stage provides a direct relationship between yield and NDVI. A pixel by pixel analysis provided a picture of the distributed patterns of wheat yield for the entire Bhakra command area (figure 3).As the IRS does not have a thermal infrared channel to derive surface temperature, the spatial delineation of actual evapotranspiration the amount of water used by the growing crops in transpiration and building plant tissuefor the Sirsa Circle was determined with another satellite system, the Landsat Thematic Mapper. The blue patches in the image below represent waterlogged fields.Satellite Remote Sensing data were entered into a Geographical Information System (GIS) and the administrative boundaries of the command areas digitized. The positions of the irrigation canals derived from the high resolution satellite images were also entered into the GIS allowing an analysis of the spatial structure in crop yield and evapotranspiration in relation to irrigation water distribution. Ancillary data such as groundwater quality, pre-monsoon depth of the water table, and soil types were also entered into the GIS.The daily canal discharge data were provided by the Haryana Irrigation and Water Resources Department, and precipitation records from 12 local climate stations were collected. For completeness, the results of earlier research by others on integrated water management in the Sirsa Circle using the hydrological model FRAME were included in this study. FRAME contains a network of 46 grids, each grid having options for various crops, land use types, and a field-scale crop water balance model. Water flow in the multiple root zones is schematized and horizontal water distribution at the field level is taken into account. Combined with groundwater, surface distribution, and regional drainage models, the interaction between the surface water and groundwater systems is formulated so that canal network leakages and percolation losses from agricultural fields could be accounted for. These water and salt balance data were linked to the administrative command areas of the Sirsa Circle. The outputs of the hydrological model FRAME were integrated with the remote sensing and field data within the GIS.The satellite-based data for the rabi season indicated a nonuniform intensity of wheat cropthe percentage of the total cropped area varied between 25 and 90 percent. This information revealed that either the geographical environment was not suited to the cultivation of wheat or that the irrigation management was unreliable. Analysis of the data showed that the wheat intensity differed considerably between the divisions of Sirsa Circle, although more homogeneous at the subdivision level. No evidence of head to tail effects between divisions was found. The irrigation intensity was found to be similarly heterogeneous within the divisions revealing that the irrigation practices were not uniform at division or subdivision levels.A comparison between wheat intensity and irrigation intensity showed a correlation coefficient of less than 10 percent. This suggested that the wheat crop was not related to the presence of Figure 3. A detailed pixel analysis of the IRS images provided a picture of the distributed patterns of wheat yields for the entire Bhakra command. The image below shows the impact of groundwater in increasing the wheat area intensity (green color) along the flood plains of the Ghaggar River.irrigation so either the irrigation system was malfunctioning, or other constraints such as unfavorable economic conditions prevailed.The average wheat yields over the whole of Sirsa Circle were found to be highly homogeneous, providing 3.76 tons per hectare, slightly less than the 4.09 tons per hectare for the whole of the Bhakra Canal command area. As the coefficient of variation of the wheat yields was found to lie around 9 percent and the internal variation of the command areas around 21 percent, the data suggested that wheat cultivation was conforming to the principles of warabandi. However, the satellite-spotted spatial structure of wheat yield and evapotranspiration revealed a fingered pattern identical to the canal water distribution network; and the observed geometry matched the treebranch structure of the canal system layout. This showed that the fields in the direct vicinity of the distributary and minors contained a higher agricultural density than areas further away from the canals. Obviously, these fields received more water, either directly from the canals, or as seepage through the subsurface.Using the digital information in the GIS, the relationship between the agricultural practices and the canals was calculated. The calculations clearly illustrated that the level of confidence of obtaining a favorable wheat yield (> 4.5 tons per hectare) was higher within the first 200 m from the distributary/minor than when further away. Furthermore, beyond 1,500 m of the main water conveyance system, favorable yields are exclusively ruled out (figure 4). As the distributaries/ minors cover a very small fraction of the cultivated area, the water leakage from the canals was shown to be intense.Consequently, the analyses demonstrated that the irrigation system in the Sirsa Circle is a physically constraining water distribution system. Canal water was not reaching all minors in sufficient quantity due to the vast water losses from the main canals. To remedy these effects, the farmers intensively cultivate wheat in the immediate vicinity of the major water conveyance systems. Beyond 2,000 m from these systems, large tracts of land were abandoned resulting in the fields being rapidly salinized and becoming unusable for cultivation.To provide spatiotemporal information on the water and salt balance components of the irrigation system in the Sirsa Circle, the water and salt balance components were determined for the 46 model grids of FRAME on a day-by-day basis and later converted to annual values. Information on the evapotranspiration, water storage in the soil, canal irrigation water, precipitation, tube well irrigation, seepage, leakage, drainage, salt storage changes, and various solute concentrations related to the water fluxes was integrated in the model. The outputs were compared to the figures for the water balance of the lower-saturated groundwater system, or aquifer, underneath the upper system. rabi 1995-1996. The results showed that the water table declined dramatically from the beginning to the end of the Bhakra irrigation canal system indicating a substantial imbalance between inflow and outflow of water. The buildup of water climbed from 18 mm per year at Sirsa to over 182 mm per year at the end of the Bhakra Main Canal. At the same time, the drainage outflow of 221 mm per year through the Ghaggar River was far below the necessary capacity to dispose of the salts brought into the area by the irrigation system. Consequently, the model showed salt buildup in all grids without exception varying from a low 0.7 ton per hectare to a high 3.3 tons per hectare. To halt the accumulation of excess water and salts in the system, substantial interventions will need to be introduced.A correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationship between agricultural practices and the hydrological processes. At the scale of the model grids, wheat yield was correlated with wheat intensity, seepage, and actual and relative evapotranspiration. Wheat intensity showed a high correlation with the hydrological processes confirming that the farmers do indeed cultivate wheat according to the hydrological conditions rather than by the reigning irrigation practices. This was confirmed when the correlation coefficients between canal water supply, wheat yield, wheat intensity, and irrigation intensity showed no statistical significance.The performance of an irrigated system can be evaluated from various viewpoints and by a wide spectrum of indicators.Water consumption should be considered in a regional context as local water losses may be effectively taken up elsewhere in the same system of a command area or river basin. Also, nonagricultural uses and losses should be accounted for. The concept of water accountingthe analysis of uses, consumption, and productivityhas been introduced to clarify the links between regional hydrological processes and water uses.The objective of protective irrigation schemes is to optimize production per unit of water rather than per unit of land. The hydrological model analyses showed that wheat consumed 428 mm per season bringing the productivity of water consumed for wheat to 0.88 kg per m 3 . Applying the 1996 international wheat price for wheat of US$163 per ton, the net return to water consumed was US$0.14 per m 3 . This is considered fairly productive, but this happens at a cost of a salinization rate of 1.81 tons per hectarea far from sustainable system.Without the analyses obtained through the use of satellite remote sensing, hydrological models, and GIS, the Sirsa Circle would appear to exhibit uniform crop productivity indicating that irrigation system targets are met. The intrinsic intensity of warabandi is however, differentit is a system whereby water is provided to ensure all farmers can grow crops and maximize the returns per unit of water. Although the canal system failed to bring water to farm holdings located furthest from the canals, farmers were able to adjust crop types and the field locations so they could benefit optimally from non-intended irrigation practices. This was especially evident in the Sirsa Circle area served by the Bhakra Main Branch Canal where farmers cultivated wheat close to the main conveyance system where the crops benefited from the fresh water belt underneath the leaking canals. Although the returns to water were good, the buildup of intolerable levels of salinity makes this system unsustainable in the long term. This investigation therefore, demonstrated that the productivity per unit of water consumed can be derived from satellite remote sensing techniques using outputs such as yield and crop water use. The additional value of the hydrological model calculations revealed the water and salt storage processes and the subsurface redistribution of water and salts. All the disciplineshydrology, agronomy, productivity, environment need to be built into performance and water accounting frameworks and these outputs can only be sufficiently quantified if remote sensing data and outputs from hydrological models are integrated into a GIS.So, to answer the initial question advanced technologies can be used successfully to assess the productivity of irrigation water and the effectiveness of irrigation management practices at a regional scale.Land allocation policies in command areas of new irrigation systems rarely allow women to obtain their own irrigated plots. Plots are normally given to heads of households whose majority comprises men. The reluctance to allocate plots to women stems from fear among policy makers and project planners that allocating plots to both men and women will lower overall irrigated agricultural productivity. They also believe that women benefit from the plots of their husbands and, unless plot sizes are varied, allocating more than one plot to a single household is inequitable. To ascertain the validity of these fears, IIMI examined the Dakiri irrigation system in Burkina Faso.The Dakiri system is one of the few irrigation systems in Burkina Faso where several women have secured irrigated plots on an individual basis. Sixty womenrepresenting 9 percent of the total number of plot holdersowned individual plots. Most of their husbands also owned plots. The study compared the effects on productivity, labor contributions, and intra-household distribution of income derived from agricultural activities where both men and women within the same household owned irrigated plots, and where men are the sole owners of plots.Several women have secured irrigation plots in the Dakiri irrigation system, Burkina Faso.The Dakiri reservoir has a capacity of 10,460,000 m 3 serving a command area of 120 hectares of which 112 hectares are cultivated by 740 farmers who have individual plot sizes ranging from 0.08 to 0.16 hectare. The overall agricultural productivity of the command is around 4.7 tons per hectarea figure that compares favorably with production for the rest of Burkina Faso, and is much higher than the 0.50.8 ton per hectare of millet produced from rain-fed farming.Rice is the predominant irrigated crop and total rice production reaches around 900 tons per annum. Irrigation increases annual agricultural output for farmers but does not replace traditional rain-fed agriculture80 percent of household cereal needs are derived from rain-fed agriculture. As rice is not part of the staple diet, most farmers sell the rice and use the income to purchase the balance requirement of millet and sorghum.In the majority of households there are one adult man, one adult woman or more, and several children. The adult man is considered the head of the household. All household members have an obligation to work on the rain-fed, family or collective field where sorghum and millet are grown. Adult household members may also have access to one or more individual fields, allocated by the head of the household.The collective field is considered the most important field in terms of securing food for the household. Individually owned fields are cultivated only after the work obligations on the collective fields are fulfilled. The exact number of days of labor each household member has to contribute to the collective field is a matter of negotiation. On average, adult female and male household members invest around 35 and 46 days a year, respectively, to the cultivation of collective fields.The harvest from the collective field is stored in a collective granary. When women prepare meals they either serve themselves from this granary, or the household head allocates shares to each of the kitchen units. If the production of the collective field exceeds consumptive requirements, the surplus is controlled by the household head. He uses the proceeds as savings in the form of livestock, or to buy clothes for other household members as a token of appreciation for their labor.The productivity of rain-fed agriculture, however, is seldom sufficient to meet family consumption needs. Households depend more and more on the production from the womens individual plots to complement the harvest from the collective fields. Consequently, women are increasingly turning towards the cultivation of basic food grainsmillet and sorghumin place of groundnut and vegetables. Women store their harvests in separate granaries and have full control over how the produce is used. Although the millet is used to complement the supplies in and women, 1991-1993. the collective granary, the groundnut harvest is sold, providing an important source of individual income.Allocation of irrigated plots to women is often resisted by policy makers and project planners. They fear that women will not produce as much as men because of time constraints or a lack of technical farming skills. Most farm household members in Dakiri do not agree. Almost 60 percent of the interviewed women thought there was no difference in agricultural performance between men and women, while 7 percent thought that women can produce as much as men provided they receive some help from their husbands.Around one third of the men thought there was no discernible difference between male and female holders of plots. But, over half the men thought that womenbecause they were more patientwere better rice cultivators, more careful weeders, and had higher productivity. The production figures confirm these perceptionsthe average agricultural productivity of womens plots is, in general, at least equal to or slightly higher than that of mens plots (figure 5).Another fearbased on the assumption that if women are also given plots, they will reduce their labor contributions to plots owned by males in favor of working on their ownis that overall agricultural productivity will decline. Instead, the study illustrated that agricultural productivity actually increases (figure 6). Furthermore, the productivity of labor shows no significant difference between plots owned by women and men for households where both men and women have plotsboth are around 60 kg per person-day. For those households where only men have a plot, labor productivity is less than half, about 25 kg per person-day. Clearly, labor use efficiency increases sharply when women have plots.Most farm households give priority to rain-fed farming and finish sowing their rain-fed fields before initiating irrigated production. Around 17 percent of a households total labor capacity is devoted to irrigated cultivation. However, the total amount of labor each household spends on agriculture is not just a simple function of total household labor availability, but is dependent on the intra-household division of rights and responsibilities. The willingness of any household member to increase labor in irrigated agriculture depends on how much he or she can expect to get in return in comparison to returns to labor for other activities.Additional labor is required to cultivate irrigated plots in the wet season. To accommodate these demands, men and children may work in the rain-fed fields while women and other children , 1991-1993. take care of the irrigated plots. Others may cultivate the rain-fed fields in the morning and attend to the irrigated plots in the evening. If only men have an irrigated plot, the plots are considered as collective fields and rice cultivation becomes a collaborative effort between the men and their wives.When women have their own irrigated plots, they undertake most of the cultivation tasks themselves. On average, they dedicate 11 more days per year to irrigation than households where women do not have their own plots and, overall, they increase household labor contributions to irrigation by 10 persondays a year. Interestingly, male labor contributions to irrigated agriculture, vary considerablyfrom 0 to 22 person-days per yearand are unrelated to whether or not their wives have a plot.The intra-household distribution of the proceeds of irrigated farming is very much a function of the productivity of the rain-fed plots. When the millet harvest from a collective field is too low for feeding the family, the proceeds from the individual plots are initially used for buying additional millet. When the millet production from the collective field is sufficient, the proceeds from the individual rain-fed fields and irrigated plots are used for other purposes. Men usually invest in livestock, procure clothes for themselves or their children, purchase food, and use the remainder for other personal requirements. Once the household food requirements are secured, women use the balance of their incomes to meet various domestic needs, purchase clothes, and invest in livestock. These women are happy to contribute to household needs, preferring to contribute to the household by providing produce from their own plotsrather than by providing labor to the plots of their husbandsas it gives them a greater degree of economic independence from their husbands.The four effects of having an individual plotthe ability to contribute to household survival, financial independence, supporting kin, and individual wealth accumulation substantially improve the bargaining position of a woman within a household. The ability to significantly contribute to household survival is a source of much pride, within both the household and the community. In fact, a mans appreciation of a woman is very much a function of her agricultural performance.In households where both men and women have plots, they have more irrigated land than households where only men have plots. But policy makers and project managers have nothing to fearalthough the labor contribution to each plot decreases when there is more than one plot holder per household, the allocation of separate smaller plots to men and women has positive agricultural production and social benefits.Since the early 1970s, governments in Latin America, Mexico, and the Caribbean have been transferring, in one form or another, many public companies and other state enterprises to the private sector. Such transfers have been especially prevalent in the manufacturing and transportation sectors, but privatization has now extended to almost all sectors of the economy, including the provision of water services such as potable water and irrigation.Up to the 1900s, most water-based services in Latin America were provided by the private sector. It was only since the 1920s that governments in the region decided water services should be provided by the public sector and only since the 1940s that such services should be provided by agencies of the central government rather than by the states. Numerous reasons have been adduced to justify intervention in the provision of water services, but the primary one was a belief, by both governments and international donor agencies, that strong government intervention in the economy was required to ensure economic growth led to improved economic welfare. In the 1970s, this belief was reversed with a change in ideology and a feeling that the private provision of services was a more efficient means of improving both economic efficiency and social welfare. Furthermore, transfer of management responsibility from the public sector to groups of users was not just a means of increasing overall production but was a necessity to ensure sustainability of infrastructure, particularly the infrastructure developed to provide water for large-scale irrigated areas.In many countries, the lack of political will to charge the full operation and maintenance (O&M) costs to users of public facilities often resulted in a situation where public infrastructure was unsustainable. This has been particularly true of public irrigation schemesit is easy to find irrigation schemes developed withdesign lives of 50 years but requiring rehabilitation in less than 10 years. As a means of ensuring sustainability of the infrastructure, in the early 1990s, many governments in Latin America, Mexico, and the Caribbean decided to transfer responsibility for the management of irrigation to the user associations.The agriculture sector of Mexico accounts for about 7 percent of GDP but employs 23 percent of the economically active population in the country. Although Mexico has a land area of approximately 2 million square kilometers, over 75 percent of the country is classified as arid and semiarid. Consequently, water is the major constraining factor in agricultural production in many areas. The productivity of irrigated land is 2.3 times higher than that of rain-fed land and accounts for 50 percent of the total value of agricultural production and around 70 percent of agricultural exports.At the end of the 1980s, Mexico had approximately 1,300 storage dams, 2,100 diversion dams, 68,000 km of canals, 47,000 km of drains, 54,000 km of service roads, and over 50,000 deep irrigation wells. The financial crisis of 1982 not only reduced the availability of funds for new irrigation investment, but significantly constrained the funds available from the government for maintenance. Owing to the deterioration of the infrastructure, it was estimated that by the end of the decade about 800,000 hectares of irrigated land would be out of production or used at a reduced level, and a further 1.5 million hectares would require rehabilitation.Having recognized these problems, the National Water Commission (CNA) was established to develop a new policy for the management of water in the country. This policy led to the establishment of the National Program for Decentralization of the Irrigation Districtsthe transfer program.The total irrigated area in Mexico is 6 million hectares, 3.3 million hectares of which are distributed among 80 public irrigation districts. The transfer program was designed to establish a system of joint management between CNA and the water user associations whereby the 80 public irrigation districts would become financially self-sufficient.Phase I of the transfer program shifted secondary level management responsibilities from the governmentstaffed irrigation districts to water user associations. Each of the water user associations was given responsibility for O&M within a modulethe irrigated area served by the secondary canal down to the individual farm intakeswhile CNA retained responsibility for the management of the water source(s) and the main canals. The program was designed to reduce government subsidies to the districts to zero. To do this, it was necessary to increase water fees to cover all O&M and administrative costs, including the costs incurred by CNA in operating the water source(s) and the main canals.Phase II of the transfer program created Limited Responsibility Societies (SLRs). These societies are federations of the individual modules within a single irrigation district. SLRs became responsible for operating the main canals, drains, and roads of the irrigation districts. The SLRs are expected to pool the maintenance equipment provided to the modules to maximize the use of the equipment. Once the transfer program is implemented in all the 80 public irrigation districts, and all the SLRs are in place, CNA will be responsible for management of the water sources, as well as for playing a larger role in overall water resource planning and development.In contrast to many countries, particularly those in Asia that first attempted to create water user associations at the block level (100500 hectares), Mexico decided to form these associations at the module level (1,00020,000 hectares). In the early years of the program, the modules were relatively small as it was felt these would be easier for users to manage. With experience, however, it became obvious that these modules were too small and, as a result, the water fees had to be very high to cover the fixed staff and overhead costs of administering O&M in the area. Therefore, to ensure that the modules in the districts that were transferred later on were financially viable and of manageable sizes, larger modules (5,00050,000 hectares) were created.An important part of the Mexican transfer program was the granting of water concessions to the water user associations by the government. These are part of the legal agreement signed between the government and these associations. Users do not have individual water rights. Instead, each association has a proportional right (based on area) to the supply of surface water available to the district for that season. Concessions are made for a fixed time frame, 5 to 50 years, and can be taken away if an association does not fulfill its agreement with CNA.The decision to implement the transfer program was made at the highest level of the government, the Office of the President. This decision was strongly supported by the farmers in the more commercial irrigated areas in the country, primarily in the north and northwest where 53 percent of the irrigated area of the country is located. As a result, the initial systems transferred were concentrated in the more commercial areas as shown in table 1.By concentrating on areas where the program had strong local support and where the systems were relatively large, Mexico was able to jump-start the process. Transfer of O&M responsibility to the associations was shown to be a viable strategy. Between 1990 and 1994, transfers of over 2.45 million hectares were made within the country against the original target of 1.96 million hectares.A key aspect of the transfer process was to ensure that water user associations had adequate financial resources to be self-sufficient. This meant that the Removing such a heavy dependency upon the federal government has unquestionably improved the overall financial sustainability of the transferred districts. This was particularly obvious during 1995 when, due to the prevailing financial crisis, the government provided virtually no operating budget to the line agencies such as CNA. In contrast to the 1982 financial crisis, when the districts almost stopped operating due to lack of funds and all maintenance was deferred, funds from the users kept the modules operating while the users actually carried out some of the deferred maintenance themselves. The funds derived from the water tariffs that went to CNA provided the critical finance to ensure that CNA could continue to carry out the necessary O&M on the main canals and water sources.Responsibility for O&M from the secondary canals downwards was transferred to the modules. In the process, employees who worked for CNA and who were competent and required by the module, were hired by the modules and the others were released. In many cases, the modules realized they could not afford all the staff that were being funded by CNA and the consequent reductions significantly reduced CNAs overall staffing levels. The staffing changes are included in table 3.In line with the policy of making irrigation districts more financially sustainable, it was recognized that the users would have to pay the real O&M costs for their irrigation service. This meant that the costs of water for farmers increased significantly. Although the costs of water with respect to the costs of production increased slightly, the percentages still ranged from 3 to 8, which are not unusual for irrigated agriculture.Although the cost of water relative to the total production costs did not increase significantly over the previous 10 years, the terms of trade of agriculture changed drastically. With the removal of the subsidies on inputs and the elimination of most price guarantee programs, profitability of grain crops declined by more than half. Figure 7 shows that in Rio Lerma the net returns for maize, wheat, and sorghum suffered a serious decline over the 10 years, 19841994. This trend poses a threat to the sustainability of the transferred irrigation systems as it reduces the ability of the users to maintain the system and will encourage them to underfund O&M.Approximately 60 districts have been transferred since the program started in 1990. The government is now left with the last 20 districts for turnover, each with its own specific set of problems some are located in areas where there is civil unrest, the irrigation infrastructure of others has structural problems, and farmers refuse to accept turnover until they are rehabilitated; and in others there are serious water quality problems. At the same time, the government is starting to face some second generation problems in the districts already transferred.The transfer program significantly increased the actual funds available for O&M. In most districts these funds were obtained by volumetric charges for water. There are, however, two interlinked weaknesses in the present water tariff system:1. In the districts there is normally no reserve fundthe fees are set at a level just sufficient to pay the day-today O&M expenses of the modules.2. Volumetric charges appear logical but it is assumed that districts will always have water. The lack of a base fee charged to all users, independent of volume, means that any time a module cannot deliver water its income drops to zero.To avoid these problems in the future, modules will clearly have to change to a system of charging a base fee for all users in the system together with a volumetric charge. Without this system they will face the same problems that have already struck a number of modules in the north during the recent droughtsome modules became insolvent or were on the verge of becoming insolvent as they did not have a sufficient volume of irrigation water to generate sufficient funds to meet the operating costs of the module.To help address some of the problems associated with the transfer program and promote the change to more commercial agriculture, the government passed a new water law in 1992 and introduced regulations to support it in 1994. Together, the two documents were designed to form the basis of the transfer program and provide the legal framework to allow the sale of water for highervalue uses, as well as to protect the existing water rights of the modules. (1984)(1985)(1986)(1987)(1988)(1989)(1990)(1991)(1992)(1993)(1994) in the Alto Rio Lerma Irrigation District: Wheat, maize, and sorghum.*In each transferred district, water user associations within the individual modules were granted renewable concessions (for 5 to 50 years) once they fulfilled all the filing and registration requirements. This entitled them to a proportional share (based on land area) of the water available in the district for each season. However, nowhere in the concession did it specify the volume of water associated with the concession. In contrast to the California water law, which defined a volumetric share, the Mexican law did not provide water on an individual priority basis, but instead the water right was defined as proportional to expected streamflow, stored amount, or canal flow for that season. Consequently, if streamflow is 20 percent below normal, each right holder will receive 20 percent less water.In addition to not actually granting a volumetric right, the law defining concessions also is unclear on priorities in case of shortage. Without a firm volumetric water right, the actual operating procedures are left to the districts and CNA. This fails to provide any guarantee of quantity of water for those who buy or rent water rights. In 1995, based on an interpretation that grants priority to domestic use, the state of Nuevo Leon and the city of Monterrey diverted the water of the Rio San Juan to fill the Cuchillo Dam. Yet, the water user associations in the Bajo Rio San Juan Irrigation District have valid concessions that have been approved by CNA for this water and also have a 1952 agreement signed by the President of Mexico stating that this water belongs to Tamaulipas and the Bajo Rio San Juan Irrigation districts. This action has brought to question the effectiveness of the water law and the regulations that exist to implement the law. This is particularly worrisome as the water law is the legal basis for the transfer program.The transfer program in Mexico took off faster than planned and clearly created a system that is more sustainable than the previous one. Users are paying more for water but are receiving better service from the local module staff who now work for them rather than for CNA. Some of the achievements of the program to date are displayed in the box.Achievements 1. By the end of 1995 more than 80 percent of the 3.3 million hectares of publicly irrigated land in the country was transferred to joint management.2. Water user associations were shown to be able to operate and maintain the modules, even of sizes over 30,000 hectares.3. Water tariffs collected by the users supported the module O&M activities and funded the majority of CNA staff activities at the main canal and water source levels.4. The number of CNA staff was significantly reduced leaving fewer but higher-qualified staff.5. The elimination of unionized staff removed one of the major complaints of the farmers. It has been reported that the ability to hire and fire their own staff has improved the responsiveness of the operational staff to the needs of the users.6. There was no discernible impact on the area irrigated in the transferred districts and yields appear to have been unaffected as a result of the change in management.There are additional changes that need to be made in the irrigated sector to ensure the program is sustainable. The system of water tariffs must be changed so that the districts develop a reserve fund to pay for future costs of improvements as well as to protect the modules from unexpected expenses. With a rapidly increasing population and the structural transformation of Mexico from an agricultural society into an industrial nation, competition for water is increasing. Mexicos legal system needs to be modified to clarify what rights exist for irrigated agriculture and how these rights can be protected against competing demands for water from municipal and industrial users.The decision by the government to remove all subsidies and withdraw from the agricultural production business has turned the terms of trade against agriculture. Combined with the impacts of the North American Free Trade Association (NAFTA) and the resulting cheap imports of maize, soybean, and wheat from the US and Canada, irrigated agriculture is under tremendous economic pressure. In the next decade there needs to be radical change in irrigated agriculture as farmers shift to highervalued crops to justify the use of expensive irrigation water and infrastructure. These changes will require new agricultural policies, technical assistance from both the public and private sectors, and significant investments in agriculture to ensure Mexican farmers can compete with agricultural producers in the US and Canada.By the end of 1995 more than 80 percent of the 3.3 million hectares of publicly irrigated land in Maxico was transfered to joint management.Institutional development forms the most significant part of a countrys development strategy. It serves to institutionalize technical solutions introduced by various infrastructure projects, thereby ensuring good returns on the heavy investments made in infrastructure development. The large scale of Pakistans irrigation infrastructure is well-known. To determine whether a responsive institutional framework could improve irrigation performance in Pakistan, several pilot studies on social organization were undertaken in the Punjab and Sind. These studies were designed not as part of a broad policy of irrigation management transfer, or privatization where government-owned assets are transferred to the private sector, but as an effort to transfer the key management functions related to a distributary subsystem to water user associations as part of a strategy to decentralize the management of the countrys irrigation systems.In countries where irrigation management transfer has been attempted, water user associations have been promoted to take over the responsibility for managing irrigation and drainage systems to reduce government costs, and improving water distribution equity and system performance. In contrast, these present pilot studies in the Punjab and the Sind were designed to test if the assumptions underlying management transfer policies hold true for irrigation systems and water user communities in Pakistan. The first step taken was to learn how to organize water users at the distributary or minor canal level. The second step was to test the effectiveness of these water user associations in sharing the management responsibilities with the government agencies and, ultimately, improving irrigation performance.These projects were based on a number of theoretical assumptions and principles. Collective action is assumed to be more effective than individual action in solving the social problems related to equitableresource allocation and sustainable resource management. This is particularly true for water in irrigated agriculture as irrigation systems are inherently complex socio-technical systems.Organizing farmers is a local responsibility and the decisions related to social organization should be taken by the local authorities and the water users. Trained community-based leaders and volunteers can play a significant role in helping farmers become organized, and provide awareness of the technical, socioeconomic, and environmental issues of irrigation. The awareness of these issues will heighten farmer motivation to develop sustainable water user associations.Although collective action by the organized groups of farmers is expected to facilitate improved management of the irrigation systems, it does not ensure that users will consume water more productively. This will become a key issue to be reviewed, following successful transfer of responsibility to the water user associations.Six locations were selected for the pilot studiesthree each in the Punjab and the Sind. In the Punjab, work was sited at the Hakra 4-R Distributary Canal in Haroonabad and two small dams at Fateh Jang. The sites in the Sind included a distributary canal in each of the three districts: Mirpurkhas, Sanghar, and Nawabshah. The two independent small dam sites at Fateh Jang contrast with the other canal sites, in that the latter are parts of the integrated canal system in Pakistan.Five-member field teams, a team leader plus four others including social organizers and technical research assistants, were first deployed in the Hakra 4-R Distributary. Social organizers moved into selected communities and interacted with the farmers. Here, they helped the farmers set up water user associations through a four-phase process. The first phase was to generate support mobilization, working with collaborating partners and agencies to provide the necessary assistance for the work, and with recruitment and training of field staff. The second phase invoked the initial organization, generating awareness among the farmers, assessing the characteristics of the community, and promoting the initial formation of the associations. The third phase identified the association leaders, developed action plans, and reached agreements with the local government agencies for joint management. Finally, in the fourth phase, the water user associations action plans for taking over certain agreed functions of irrigation management at the distributary level were implemented.A key feature of the methodology adopted in this program was the use of community-based volunteers referred to as contact farmers in the Sind, and social organization volunteers in the Hakra 4-R Distributary in the Punjab. They served as links between the field teams and the community and became an extended part of the social organization field teams. These volunteers were selected for their acceptability within the community, their leadership attributes, and their motivation to work with their colleagues to improve system management.From the socioeconomic baseline surveys certain general characteristics of the irrigation system emerged. In all locations well over half the respondents complained of inequity between and within distributaries. The problem was attributed to the influentialsthe big landlords and irrigation officials. Water distribution within the watercourses though, was reported as equitable. The effect of inequity of water distribution between head and tail in the Hakra 4-R District was clearly apparent. The average cropping intensity in the head reaches of the system was 147 percent while in the tail it was only 97 percent.Farmers were enthusiastic about helping themselves. Over 90 percent of respondents in both provinces were willing to become involved in maintenance activities at the distributary level, and most were already directly engaged in operations and maintenance of the watercourses and parts of the drainage systems. Almost without exception, respondents were willing to work together to develop user associations to help improve the water management and productivity of irrigated agriculture.After consultation with the water users through individual and small group interviews, 146 social organization volunteers were selected in the Hakra 4-R Distributary. The average number of volunteers was four per village. This contrasted with the strategy in the Sind where identification of the volunteers was based on the number of watercourses rather than by representation per village. After the social organization volunteers and contact farmers were identified, a series of meetings were conducted to build general awareness on project objectives and intended methodologies. Several seminars on social organization in irrigated agriculture provided the opportunity for the volunteers to discuss how problems in managing the irrigation systems could be addressed collectively at the local level. Subsequently, formal consultation meetings were organized with the water users, with the intention of developing tentative plans for establishing water user associations. Initially, the focus of the discussions centered on membership of water user associations, organizational structure, and procedures for identifying and electing the leaders. Attention of the participants was also drawn to the provisions of the existing laws and the desirability for specific changes.The water user associations in the Sind were developed along the lines of a Farmers become already involved in maintenance activities.structure followed by the On-Farm Water Management (OFWM) directorates in their earlier attempts on having a water user association for each watercourse. The intention was to federate them into distributary level water user associations. In the Punjab, an informal committee of 3 to 7 persons was chosen for each watercourse that, in turn, nominated one person to represent the watercourse at the higher level. Membership of the water user associations in the Punjab embraced all shareholders, landowners, tenants, and lessees but in the Sind, all tenants were excluded from membership, as their tenure was temporary.In the process of identifying association leaders, in both the Punjab and the Sind the water users were informed of the meetings by diligently working door-to-door volunteers, or by announcing the meetings via the local mosque loudspeakers. Meetings were held at the convenience of water users, usually after sunset. In the Sind, a representative of the OFWM directorate usually participated in the meetings, whereas in the Punjab, the social organization volunteers and IIMIs field team members had to work without much assistance from any agency staff.High motivation is evident among the water user community to develop water user associations to improve the reliability and equity of irrigation services. To sustain that motivation, important information on the cost-benefits of collective action needs to be fed back to the participating water users. In fairly early days, it is important for the objectives and functions of the associations to be clearly identified. Similarly, the legal status of the associations needs to be clarified if they are to become permanent custodians of components of the management of the irrigation systems. To adequately manage the distributary-level irrigation and drainage systems, the associations need to be able to mobilize sufficient financial resources. They also require some technical assistance. Yet, until the enabling legal framework is established, it is difficult to clearly identify the methods of resource mobilization and the sources for technical assistance inputs.Accountability of the water user associations and their office bearers and the associated government irrigation agency has yet to be clearly defined and understood by everyone in the community. Monitoring and evaluation of the activity and functioning of the associations need to be introduced. To avoid confusion about the objectives of the associations and the government agencies, policies for managing the irrigation systems and closer liaison mechanisms between the newly established associations and the government agency staff need to be developed.These pilot studies have now reached a stage where the newly formed Farmers were willing to work together to form user associations.associations need institutional support to proceed to the next stage of associational development. As system operation and maintenance are under the purview of the provincial irrigation departments, transfer of authority to the water user associations is essential. Meantime, current water delivery practices should remain in place until the water user associations have taken over, and can make the changes they require. It is only after the departments of irrigation, agriculture, and revenue, and the regulatory and law enforcement authorities have given full recognition to these new associations, can they proceed with their collective actions to better manage the operation and maintenance of the distributaries.IIMI explored the relationship between water distribution rules and water distribution performance in the Tambraparani irrigation system. Water distribution rules specify who is to get water, how much, and when. They exist in all irrigation systems to simplify decision making and reduce the potential for conflicts among users. In Tambraparani, the water distribution rules do not specify a pattern of water distribution that serves the desires of the farmers; so users evade the rules thus adversely affecting water delivery performance. Furthermore, inconsistencies in the rules lead to inefficient and inequitable water distribution.The Tambraparani irrigation system lies in the Tambraparani Basin at the southern tip of India (figure 9). The Tambraparani River originates in the Western Ghat mountains and flows southeastward to the Gulf of Mannar. Major tributaries include the Servalar and Manimuthar rivers. The total registered command of the Tambraparani irrigation system is 34,934 hectares.The Tambraparani system developed by accretion over a period of centuries. Initially, independent tank (small reservoir) systems were combined by construction of feeder channels fed by diversion from the Tambraparani River. Later, larger reservoirs were constructed near the head of the basin to control the river flow. Most of the water in the basin is now captured in three reservoirs Papanasam, Servalar, and Manimuthar and the Tambraparani riverbed serves as the main channel of the system. Water is diverted from the river by 8 anicuts Water Distribution Rules and Performance in the Tambraparani Irrigation System in India (diversion weirs) into 11 channels. Farmers irrigate directly from the channels and indirectly from 187 tanks fed by the channels.Traditionally, farmers in the Tambraparani system plant rice during the pishanam (OctoberMarch) and kar (June-September) seasons. Since completion of the Papanasam reservoir in the 1940s, additional demands have been placed on the Tambraparani water, which include diversions for hydropower generation, the new advance kar crop growing season (April though July), and the cultivation of banana. Banana is now planted in one third of the command, overwhelmingly in the tail areas, as it provides much better returns than rice. Unlike rice, banana requires year-round irrigation so it does not fit in with the seasonal irrigation schedules. In addition, there has been a 10 percent increase in the command area, and domestic and industrial users have increased so that they now require over 14 percent of the available water.The Tambraparani system is operated and maintained by the Tamil Nadu Public Works Department (PWD, now called the Water Resources Organization). System management is the responsibility of an Executive Engineer and a number of subordinates including subdivisional officers, sectional officers, irrigation inspectors, and gate operators or laskars. The Papanasam and Servalar reservoirs and powerhouses are operated by the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB). Two District Collectors play an important role in ratifying water allocation and in other decisions on the distribution of water. There are 132 water user associations and a number of informal farmer groups. All these groups have strong influences on how the system is managed although only the PWD, the TNEB, and the District Collectors are recognized in the water distribution rules.Water is distributed to serve three functions, hydroelectric power generation, municipal and industrial use, and irrigation. Sets of rules govern the distribution of water for each of these functions. Distribution for municipal and industrial use is governed by agreements between the users and the state. Use of water for power generation is governed by rules for operation of the Papanasam reservoir. Distribution to irrigation is the most complex as there are many more users and irrigation requires large amounts of water. There exists a correspondingly complex set of distribution rules for irrigation.Essentially, water allocations to irrigation are determined by the amounts required by rice in any given season. As there is heavy rainfall during pishanam the whole command is allocated water for rice production irrespective of actual water availability. The kar season officially begins on the first day of June and finishes at the end of September. As water is not usually available in sufficient amounts to irrigate the whole command, the Executive Engineer calculates the area that can be devoted to rice production based on his estimate of the available supplies. The areas where irrigation for rice is authorized are then determined on a priority basis starting from the head and finishing at the tail of the system. Once the Executive Engineer selects the dates for water release to the selected areas, the District Collectors ratify and publicize the decision.Advance kar season begins on the first of April and finishes at the end of July. The total area that can be devoted to irrigation is calculated by the Executive Engineer based on his estimate of the available water. Under the rules, he has to ensure that 500 million cubic feet (14.2 million cubic meters) of water remain in the Papanasam reservoir on 1 June to be used for kar season irrigation. The balance is then allocated to regions in the tail of the system in a specified priority order.Once allocations are made, water has to be delivered according to a schedule, which is done at three levelswithin the 11 channels, on the main system (the river), and from the reservoirs. Distribution rules exist for each level. The 1935 Channel Operating Rules provide explicit instructions for water deliveries within each of the 11 channels. For example, the operating rules for the Nadhiyunni Channel specify that water is to be delivered using a 5-day turn system that rotates water among 4 defined subareas. For those channels with system tanks the rules specify the order in which the tanks should be filled. For the main system, PWD operating rules require that the demand for each channel be determined every day and the flows in the main system are adjusted daily to meet the demands. These demands are determined by the laskars who keep track of the crop conditions along each channel. This information passes through the PWD hierarchy to the Executive Engineer who combines the demands and then orders the gate settings of the reservoirs and channel heads in the system.Separate written sets of rules exist for the operation of the Papanasam and Manimuthar reservoirs. The rules for the operation of the Servalar reservoir are still being prepared. The Papanasam rules divide inflow to the reservoir between allocations to hydropower and irrigation. The TNEB releases water allocated to hydropower as it sees fit while the PWD Traditionally, farmers plant rice in the pishanam and kar seasons.Executive Engineer has to ask the TNEB to release the water for irrigation to meet the daily demands. The rules, however, state that releases are generally limited to the capacity of the Papanasam powerhouse. This means that the PWD Executive Engineer is unable to obtain more water from this reservoir when he needs it to satisfy irrigation demands. The TNEB presently operates the Servalar reservoir under the same set of rules so it can take Papanasam water to the Servalar reservoir through a tunnel, release it through the Servalar powerhouse, and let it flow down to the Servalar River to its confluence with the Tambraparani, and then through the Papanasam powerhouse. Unlike the Papanasam and Servalar reservoirs, the Mamimuthar reservoir is operated by the PWD Executive Engineer. The operating rules for the Manimuthar reservoir are quite specific on how Manimuthar water is to be divided between the Tambraparani System command and the command of the Manimuthar High Level Canal that feeds some 349 tanks.Operations within the channels do not conform to the 1936 Channel Operating Rules. The key reason for this is that the flow in the river varies daily while the operating rules require rather rigid scheduling. To overcome this problem, the PWD laskars attempt to provide water to the farmers as and when the farmers require it and, in return, farmers reward the laskars with gifts of rice or banana at the end of each season.Water deliveries to the channels are supposed to conform with demand. The operating decisions, however, are only as good as the data on which they are based. Almost all data, including those on crops and cropped area, originate from the laskars who use them to justify their demands. The only flow records kept are those measuring the flows at the anicuts and into the channels and these are kept by the laskars responsible for defining the daily demands. Because of reuse, the quantity of water let into the channels is always greater than the quantity released from the reservoirs. However, the return flows are ignored in the daily decisionmaking process. Rainfall data are collected on a weekly basis and, consequently, offer no value to daily adjustments. These practices give considerable power to the laskars to serve the farmers and, as a result, there is no way to check the cumulative amount of water delivered to each channel against the amount allocated for the season.To provide water to meet the daily demands, the Executive Engineer has to be able to draw on the reservoirs. During the height of the irrigation season the required flows are often greater than the water coming from the Papanasam powerhouse. Because the TNEB restricts flows from the Papanasam and Servalar reservoirs, the Executive Engineer often cannot get enough water from those reservoirs; so water is taken from the Manimuthar reservoir at the expense of the reservoirs own commandbut even this strategy may not be sufficient to meet the daily demand. As a result, actual deliveries to the channels are compromises between laskar demands and the restrictions on reservoir releases. This results in unpredictable water deliveries to the farmers.According to the rules, all areas of the Tambraparani command are allocated water for rice production during the pishanam season. PWD records show that, between 1971 and 1993, all 34,934 hectares of the registered area had been irrigated and an equivalent area harvested during pishanam. During the kar season, the PWD Executive Engineer defines the allocations. From 1979 through 1992, areas authorized irrigation during the kar season averaged 25,121 hectares. Government records indicate that the harvested areas closely matched the authorized areas.As in the kar season, the Executive Engineer defines the advance kar season allocations. These vary widely. From 1977 through 1989, allocations ranged from 0 to 18,660 hectares, averaging 5,167 hectares. However, the actual area irrigated was likely to be much greater than authorized, and the official government figures for 199495, for example, show a number of interesting features:• Advance kar rice was authorized for the maximum area in the South Main Channel permitted by the rules 4,500 hectares. The official figures given in table 4 show that rice was planted in the whole of the 5,166hectare command of the South Main Channel and, in addition, over 2,800 hectares were planted with banana.• The total area officially reported under advance kar rice in the last 4 channels was 11,127 hectares (table 4), somewhat less than the 13,617 hectares officially authorized. Adding the corresponding banana areas brings the total irrigated area to 19,777 hectares, well above the authorized limit.These values imply that considerably more area had been irrigated during advance kar than authorized. The rice area may also have been overreported to illustrate that the advance kar water was used for rice, though in fact it had been used for banana.The tail of the system is where yearround water demand is greatest because of banana cultivation. During the pishanam season, the channels get adequate irrigation water to supplement the northeast monsoon rains but water is often scarce during the rest of the year, particularly from April to June when rain seldom falls. The shortages are met by pumping groundwater or canal water, obtaining special releases, and by acquiring advance kar allocations.Pumping groundwater is unregulated, so this does not represent a problem. However, relatively few farmers have access to good quality groundwater. Instead, they pump water from the canals where the water is destined for other uses such as industry or for special releases. As this action is against the rules the water can only be obtained with the collaboration of the laskars. The scale of pumping is considerableto supply 1.13 cumecs of water to the Tuticorin industrial park, for example, the PWD releases 4.25 4.53 cumecs of water at the North Main Channel head every day. Most of the transmission losses are accounted for by the water pumped from the North Main Channel by over 300 farmers. (1994)(1995). A further means of getting water is to request special releases of water during shortage periods. Special releases are requested for numerous reasons, such as for betel cultivation (under a special government order), for the use of the famous Thiruchendur Temple, and for drinking. In almost all instances, the water is used for irrigating crops, particularly banana. Obtaining advance kar allocations is the principal way of obtaining water to irrigate banana in the tail of the system, although ostensibly, the water is released for rice.A major function of the water user associations in the tail is to mobilize pressure on government officials for advance kar allocations and for special releases. Special delegations and gifts to various government officials and politicians generally result in getting the needed water as there have been no reported banana crop failures despite the widely varying water allocations!Kar season allocation rules give priority to the channels at the head of the system. But, because of advance kar allocations, tail farmers have crops in the ground before June when farmers in the head areas begin kar season cultivation. If there is a water shortage in June or July when the two seasons overlap, the tail areas get priority for water because they already have crops in the ground. In these circumstances, advance kar allocations reverse the traditional priority for allocation to the head end of the system. This situation has led to conflicts between head and tail farmers resulting in court action.Water delivery performance refers to the delivery of water to users in the irrigation system in the correct amounts and at the correct times. As equity of delivery is one of the goals of management in Tambraparani, the correct deliveries are those that deliver the same amount of water per hectare to each part of the system. Efficiency of delivery is obtained when only the necessary water is delivered so that the excess can be used for other purposes. To investigate the water distribution performance and efficiency in the Tambraparani irrigation system, information was collected on water deliveries to the 11 channels between April 1994 and March 1995. The calculated data are given in table 5.Overall water availability was quite high during 199495. The rules state that when there is sufficient water, as in 199495, there should be continuous water delivery to the channels. In 1994-95 though, none of the channels were operated continuously. Periods of delivery varied between 66 and 86 percent of the season and the maximum deliveries to all 11 channels varied between 82 and 16 percent of design discharge.The amount of water supplied to the 11 channels was much larger than the requirementsthe target annual delivery to the channel heads is 2,340 mm while the supply to the channel heads averaged 6,335 mm. The efficiency of supply to the channels varied between 57 and 17 percent. Efficiency varied among the channels because drainage flows were ignored, channels were poorly maintained and, most importantly, the daily demand for each channel was set by the laskars of individual channels without regard to the demands from the other channels. To serve the farmers, laskars demand as much water as they can get and, as PWD officials have no way to check on the accuracy of the demands, they try to satisfy these demands as far as possible. This situation resulted in an average efficiency for all 11 channels of only 39 percent.The average annual supply of water is 3,072 mm for the registered command. And, as the average annual crop water requirement is only 1,600 mm it should be possible to irrigate all the registered command with an intensity of 200 percent in a normal year if the channels were operated slightly above 50 percent efficiency. At the 1994-95 efficiency level of 39 percent, this was not possible.Because of evasions and subversion of the rules the agricultural output of the Tambraparani irrigation system is better, from the point of view of some farmers, than it would have been if water was delivered according to the rules. Sticking to the rules would severely damage the banana as it produces significantly higher cash returns per hectare than the two rice crops, and would significantly reduce the total value of the harvests. Furthermore, the actions of the laskars, farmers, and water user associations in managing channel operations against the rules compensate, in part, for the main system delivery deficiencies, and maintain rice yields higher than they might otherwise be.The Tambraparani case shows that if water distribution rules are ill-adapted to the farmers goals, farmers will take steps to evade or subvert the water distribution rules to make the irrigation systems serve their needs. Evasion and subversion of the water distribution rules have adverse consequences on water distribution performance and increase the costs for the irrigators. Also, inconsistent sets of water distribution rules cause operational problems that are likely to lead to failure to obey the rules and to poor water distribution performance.Demands on irrigation systems are accelerating with population growth and development, and with competition with domestic and industrial uses. Responding effectively to these demands requires altering the institutional resources used for managing irrigation systems, including the water distribution rules. Once established, water law systems are often difficult to change and do not keep pace with changing water demands or social concerns. As competition for limited water supplies increases, these institutions can have significant negative impacts on opportunities for efficient water use and management. System managers need to develop a concern for the consequences of the present rules and management practices. If the rules are periodically reviewed, system managers will be forced to face the changing demands of the users, and adjust the rules accordingly.Farmers and other users need to have a formal voice. It is in the interest of the users to remove inconsistencies and adapt the rules to meet their requirements. If farmers and other users have a direct influence over system In Pakistan, one of IIMIs major efforts in recent years has been to help form water user associations as part of the irrigation management transfer program.Trained community-based volunteers help organize farmers.. This work is described in some detail in an earlier section of this report, Establishing Effective Water User Associations in Pakistan. This work was undertaken in collaboration with the States of the Sind and Punjab and relies heavily on the assistance of over 160 community-based volunteers to organize the farmers. These trained volunteers greatly assisted the action research program to achieve the high participation ratesover 80 percentof the water users in the formation and organization of the water user associations. The field teams were also briefed on a range of field survey research methodologies, socioeconomics, sample survey design, baseline surveys, and rapid appraisal methods.Under IIMIs design and operations program, in-service training is performed ubiquitiously in all field locations. Seconded staff learn about computerbased management information systems, decision support systems, calibration of structures and outlets, and discharge monitoring. In 1996, an officer of the Punjab Irrigation Department, for example, was seconded for 2 years to the IIMI office in Lahore. His task was to establish a more formal link with IIMI to strengthen the research capability of the Irrigation Department and help identify those research techniques and topics that would be most useful for collaborative work in the future.Opportunities for NARS staff to undertake field work as part of their higher degree programs constitute a further way of assisting collaborators strengthen their research capacity. Such opportunities have occurred regularly at IIMIs field research sites in Burkina Faso and Niger in West Africa, Colombia, Pakistan, Mexico, and Sri Lanka. In addition, conducting study tours, field meetings, and national and regional workshops with irrigation agency staff is part of the daily research activities of the institute that constitute an active capacitybuilding program.IIMI uses various media and methods for reaching its clients and beneficiaries. The ultimate beneficiaries of IIMIs work are the poor people of the developing world, both those directly involved in irrigated agriculture, and consumers. But IIMIs links are indirectthe results of most of its work must be used by policy makers and irrigation managers who are responsible for creating the necessary conditions for farmers to improve their productivity. Some of IIMIs work does have direct impact such as its activities on improved irrigation practices, irrigation management transfer and local management of water, multiple uses of water, and empowering local farmers including womento manage water resources themselves.Most of IIMIs partners include policy makers and planners, researchers, and irrigation and water resource managers. IIMI uses a variety of media to communicate its results, including publicationsmost significantly, Research Reports that are also published on the internetconferences and workshops, IIMI offers opportunities to NARS staff to undertake field work as part of their higher degree programs. and to a lesser extent, videos. The library and documentation unit contributes by providing information on water resources and irrigated agriculture from its databases to staff and partners alike. As IIMIs work has expanded from Asia into Africa and Latin America, publications are produced in French and Spanish where funds allow. Two low-cost but highimpact newsletters, Information Techniques for Irrigation Systems (ITIS) and in West Africa the Bulletin du Réseau Irrigation Afrique de lOuest (BRIAO), are distributed to informal networks of professionals.IIMI research outputs are disseminated through its publications.In 1996, IIMI spent US$9.12 million of its income of $10.07 million as operating expenditures (figure 10), 68 percent of which was devoted to research (figure 11). The institute ended the year with a net operating income of US$0.947 million of which $0.254 million and $0.693 million were allocated to capital purchases and the operating fund, respectively. Unrestricted donor income in 1996 amounted to US$3.9 million (table 6) or 39 percent of total donor funding.In 1996, the Institute had 20 senior internationally recruited staff. They were complemented by 14 associate staff (seconded by donor organizations) and postdoctoral fellows. National professional and management staff engaged in IIMIs research, training, and information activities in headquarters and overseas units numbered 117. IIMIs total staff numbered 356, more than half of them based outside Sri Lanka.Figure 10. Operating expenditure, 1984-1996. Figure 11. Research and governance expenditure, 1996 Restricted Projects 1996 (Continued)• Australia• Canada• China• Denmark• France• Germany• India• Japan• Netherlands• Norway• Philippines• Spain DONORS 1996• United Kingdom• USA• African Development Bank• Asian Development Bank• Inter-American Development Bank• World Bank• Food and Agriculture Organization• Ford Foundation• International Fund for AgriculturalThe Governments of Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Colombia, Egypt, India, Mexico, Nepal, Niger, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka provided program support for IIMI-related activities in those countries.During 1996, IIMIs funding support was provided by the following governments, development banks, agencies, and foundations:","tokenCount":"12477"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0705389574.json b/data/part_2/0705389574.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6555ae120605166af756e48b72ed871587dc6a9a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0705389574.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"1746a884cdabdca05703990876f9c23d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/33df16ee-407c-4c30-b6ca-a81985718bd7/retrieve","id":"945281203"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"f9891a74-8228-4ae2-8853-b40ca48dcfd4","pagecount":"4","content":"The application of framed field experiments can provide valuable insights into the multiple layers (individual-, group-and incentive-level) relevant to understanding collective action in conservation (Cardenas et al, 2004) and the pathways through which conservation behavior is affected by external institutions. To learn about people's preferences and decision-making in real resource and group contexts, research in real field contexts is needed (Cardenas, 2000;Swallow et al, 2005). There is a growing body of literature analyzing cooperative behavior in the management of natural resources in field framed experiments conducted in developing countries (Cardenas and Carpenter, 2008;Cardenas, 2009).However, there has only been limited application (Narloch et al, 2012;Midler et al, in press) in the context of (i) managing agrobiodiversity, and (ii) the impact of reward systems, such as payment for ecosystem services (PES). This emerging body of literature suggests that although individual rewards (i.e. rewards proportional to effort) are likely to be more effective and less sensitive to social factors than collective (i.e. egalitarian) rewards, the latter might have a positive effect on conservation when they are shared within socially closely-related groups and in situations where communication and deliberation about collective action is possible.Behavior in the farmer experimental games suggests that understanding farmer perceptions of fairness can have important implications for the design and implementation of conservation incentive mechanisms, particularly given the important influence of such perceptions on the pro-social behavior that underlies much de facto conservation. Incentive mechanisms, such as payments for agrobiodiversity conservation services (PACS), that can, in the words of Bowles (2008) \"support socially-valued ends not only by harnessing selfish preferences to public ends but also by evoking public-spirited motives\" are also more likely to be sustainable over the long-term.As the Peruvian government moves closer to implementing an up-scaled PACS scheme 1 for quinoa, amaranth and other crops, the importance of gaining improved understanding of how such a scheme may be designed in practice to be both effective and account for procedural justice (including the recognition of perceptions of fairness) has become increasingly critical.This new round of games explores how effective (in terms of conservation outcomes) individual/proportional rewards are compared to collective/ egalitarian rewards, depending on whether the way those rewards are to be shared is imposed exogenously (top-down) or endogenously (bottomup). In the bottom-up endogenous approach, groups have the opportunity to decide collectively which payment (proportional to effort or egalitarian) method they prefer to receive via a voting procedure. These two variables (group formation and type of reward) are designed to test if:  different reward types would affect behavior in terms of conservation outcomes; involving farmers in the process of choosing the reward type to be implemented would impact conservation outcomes; and  the constitution of groupsrandom or autonomously selected -affected conservation outcomes.Games were carried out between February and March 2016 in seven Aymara and eight Quechua communities around the Titicaca basin in Peru, involving 252 participants in total. The communities were selected with the assistance of local experts covered communities known to be interested in the maintenance of quinoa landraces. The games were applied to community groups of 12-20 participants, divided into a number of sub-groups of four each.Each participant in each community sub-group played a sequence of three games. Each sequence is called a treatment. Four treatments were played with sub-groups formed randomly (treatments 1 to 4) and two with farmers allowed to autonomously select their own sub-groups (treatment 5 and 6). Table 1 summarizes treatment combinations.Following the experimental game, a socioeconomic survey was conducted with each participant, collecting a range of data including demographic information, landholdings, and family relations, distance between group members, and frequency of collaboration.  When imposed by an external entity, proportional rewards increase conservation effectively while egalitarian rewards do not. When farmers have the possibility to choose between both types of rewards, they prefer the egalitarian one. As a result, they end up making lower levels of conservation and thus have lower payoffs. When farmers can choose their preferred reward type, the egalitarian one performs better than when it is imposed. This suggests that allowing farmer communities to determine their own group reward mechanisms/ conditions may be expected to increase their willingness to participate and thus undertake conservation activities. When farmers can choose their group peers, they conserve/ cooperate more than when their group is randomly assigned. No crowding-in or crowding-out of intrinsic motivations relative to the baseline was found following removal of the incentive mechanism. Improved understanding how group social dynamics and reward mechanisms affect conservation behavior, including through an exploration of issues of \"fairness\" (both distributive and procedural) and how this can impact willingness to participate in group reward schemes. Support for the current design of PACS schemes in Peru and elsewhere, with their high levels of \"procedural justice\" (i.e. farming communities free to choose to participate or not, select which of the priority landraces to conserve, identify specific farmer group participants and lands upon which to realize such activities, as well as determine their own level of in-kind rewards and whether these will be distributed on an egalitarian or proportional basis). Findings point towards policy implications arising from the fact that there is an apparent trade-off to be overcome between the costs of investing in social equity dimensions (in terms of procedural and distributional equity dimensions) and the benefits of obtaining more effective conservation outcomes. ","tokenCount":"886"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0727451812.json b/data/part_2/0727451812.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fdefe15b02240e087c8d1725afab5047b97451f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0727451812.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ec195945f08c42b513ef7821de0ca054","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/c8fa689c-a7a8-4cb6-b8d4-ddc27e42ab8f/retrieve","id":"628705993"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"95320ea4-278e-4a0b-a7c3-eacfd79f728b","pagecount":"47","content":"The workshop had the following objectives:• Identify researchable issues that cut across RTB crops and centres; further develop the research portfolio within the cluster CC 4.1, and better shape the vision• Identify key public and private-sector partners, brainstorm on their potential role in postharvest innovation and nutritious RTB products implementation, and define essential mechanisms for effective research collaboration• Brainstorm on a mechanism of how we link with other clusters in FP4, FP2 and FP5, and how we envision joint resource mobilization• Develop an implementation and resource mobilization strategy for the period 2018-2022• Develop and outline a plan of action for the remaining period of 2017The workshop allowed to share experiences, learn from one another and to advance the RTB cluster CC 4.1 team implementation and resource mobilization strategy, including ideas that cut across crops and centers. The workshop was held back-to-back with a two-day workshop of the RTB-ENDURE project (6-7 June 2017) to incorporate the lessons learned into the cluster portfolio, consolidate the linkages between cluster CC4.1 and other clusters in FPs 4 and 5, and develop strategies for implementation and joint resource mobilization.The workshop was structured around small facilitated working groups, presentations and plenary discussions to allow all participants to engage in practical discussion. A key note was delivered by two colleagues from NRI -Ben Bennett and Keith Tomlins -who provided an overview and insights into current advances in RTB postharvest innovations across the globe. Feedback from the workshop was very positive as participants saw great prospects for cross-crop and cross-center collaborations, harnessing linkages between the clusters within FP4 and across other FPs in addition to bringing on board other strategic partners along the value chains. This report provides an overview of the workshop, background information and objectives, a summary of the presentations and discussions, and suggestions for next steps.• Identify researchable issues that cut across RTB crops and centres; further develop the research portfolio within the cluster CC4.1, and better shape the vision• Advance the research ideas with a view on key public and private-sector partners, their potential role in postharvest innovation and nutritious RTB products implementation, and essential mechanisms for effective research collaboration.• Brainstorm on a mechanism of how we link with other clusters in FP4, FP2 and FP5• Develop an implementation plan and resource mobilization strategy for the period 2018-2022• Develop an outline plan of action for the remaining period of 2017 The principal activities on day one, 8 June 2017 included introducing the participants to RTB CRP and FP4, overview of CoA 4.1, overview of the RTB-ENDURE Project and sharing of lessons learnt from the four sub-projects (banana, cassava, potato and sweet potato) and current advances in postharvest innovation. The day ended with participants identifying principal postharvest innovations and possible gaps.The workshop started with a welcome address from Simon Heck of CIP, the leader of FP4. Goodwill messages were given by Dietmar Stoian of Bioversity International, Thierry Tran of CIAT, and Ben Bennett, Deputy Director of NRI.In his message, Ben acknowledged the good collaboration his institute has had with RTB over the period and said individual countries have begn funding research and suggested the cluster and RTB could take advantage of this opportunity. According to him, donors are demanding to see impact in a shorter space of time in comparison to what pertained previously and we need to adapt to these demands. Ben said postharvest losses is on the world agenda because a director of one of the world's biggest conservation organisations Worldwide Fund for Nature in his presentation at the Imperial College of London, where one of its major donors was present, made a passionate plea for reduction in post harvest losses. Such a statement at such a forum has put postharvest losses on the world agenda and we can take advantage of it.Busie Maziya-Dixon, IITA senior scientist and cluster CC4.1 leader, gave an overview of the agenda and the purpose of this workshop.Presented by Simon Heck, CIP (fepq0uo5ldj5mg0) • Why the cluster focused on SMEs and did not include large enterprises as next-users. In response, it was noted that the proposal focuses on SMEs and targeted vulnerable groups. It was also observed that once small enterprises in RTB are supported to be more competitive, then there is a high possibility of their transformation into large scale enterprises.• CA4.2 focused on cassava alone yet RTB-ENDURE worked on other crops such as potatoes, sweet potatoes and Bananas. The rationale behind the cluster is to harness the untapped potential for improving processing, enhancing postharvest management and reducing postharvest losses of RTB crops; target the changing needs and preferences of emerging urban markets through product and value chain development and enable producers and processors to increase food safety and quality. The cluster also provides support to crop clusters inside FP4 and enables effective linkages with postharvest and nutrition related research in FP2, FP3, and FP5. The key partners were identified as NGOs and NGO-led programs, commercial food processing enterprises, A4NH, Women's processor associations, Farmer groups/Associations and lead farmers, Natural Resource Institute (NRI) -UK, commercial processors and machinery manufacturers and fabricators. The integration of gender was emphasized noting that gender responsive approaches will be developed and applied throughout all capacity development interventions. This will also include developing and strengthening the capacity of boys and girls to develop as entrepreneurs for small businesses along the postharvest value chains.Lead and Linked products under CoA 4.1 Lead Product were categorized into four groups as presented below:• Lead product LP4.1.0: Lessons, tools and metrics to support development of nutritious and value-added RTB products • There is the need to define the different categories especially SMEs and large scale enterprises• Within the SMEs there are different categories thereby requiring different interventions.• SMEs in Nigeria are categorized as such based on the number of employees. Working with large scale enterprises was observed to be important in terms of screening varieties and providing models to learn from for equipment fabrication.• Cluster 4.1 should focus on SMEs as large companies have capacity to carry out their own research and develop technologies.• Regarding the research questions and geographical location, it was argued that there was need to remain flexible and open minded and that research centers can determine the location or study area where their research questions would be better answered.Presented by Diego Naziri, CIP (/j5s2x2ekhge0j5s) Diego Naziri, the CIP/RTB Project Leader gave an overview of the \"Expanding Utilization of RTB and Reducing Their Postharvest Losses (RTB-ENDURE) Project\" implemented in Uganda between January 2014-December 2016. He revealed that the bulkiness and high perishability of RTB crops coupled with poor postharvest handling and lack of processing & storage facilities result in short marketing channel, high post-harvest (PH) losses and limited value addition, provided the rationale for the project. The project used the cross-crop and cross-center collaboration approach involving the International Potato Center (The project Lead), Bioversity International, IITA, CIAT and CIRAD plus a wide spectrum of research-for-development stakeholders and partners including ILRI, 5 NARI, 3 Universities, 5 NGOs, Extension and other local authorities, private firms, exporters and farmers' organizations. The objective of ENDURE was to \"Improve food availability and income generation through better postharvest management and expanded use of RTB\".The Participatory Market Chain Approach (PMCA), developed by CIP, was used to help smallholder farmers link up with profitable markets by stimulating innovation process and long-term partnerships among farmers, marketers , and service providers. Participants jointly identified, analysed, and exploited new market opportunities and this process facilitated the development of marketing innovations, technological innovations and institutional innovations. Steps that were followed in the project are as presented in figure below. Success of ENDURE project is seen by the fact that the lessons are being used by CoA 4.1 to refine the cluster.Presented by Enoch Kikulwe, Bioversity (s/o8efacbswrmmlu6)Reducing post-harvest losses and promoting product differentiation in the cooking banana value chain: key research findings, research outcomes and proposed next steps.▪ High post-harvest losses (up to 13%) along the entire VC ▪ Mismatches between the banana cultivars farmers grow, those produced by input suppliers, and those preferred by the market ▪ Gender inequalities in resource access and utilization constraining the participation of women in profitable nodes of the VC ▪ Established optimum harvest age for one popular cooking banana cultivar Kibuzi (133-150 days) & optimum storage temperatures (peeled -at 10-18ºC for 5 days compared to a few hours & unpeeled-12-18ºC for 12 days compared to 5 days at room temperature▪ Using micropropagation chamber technique, one commercial seed production farmer group with 22 members (10 women and 12 men) has increased their acreage with market-demanded varieties (longer shelf-life) and have sold approx. 3200 in six months. ▪ One female trader (who was only farming) has accessed the export market by using unpeeled fingers and proper post-harvest practices (proper harvesting, cushioning, hygiene, etc.), which were promoted by the project, supplying about 150 boxes (@10kg) per week, allowing her to generate about $1,000 after 6 months. ▪ One retail woman is serving customers faster (reducing the waiting time by 15 minutes) with peeled bananas from the new technology she has adopted, including a premium to the prices she fetches.Charcoal cooler Initial) Prototype stage: testing has been done with one woman retailerFurther testing required• Testing with more traders• Testing at farm level• Design improvement(efficiency improvement)• Different sizes• Alternative fuel sources for evapo-cooling• Cost Benefit Analysis Differentiated forms (peeled and unpeeled fingers, clusters and protected bunches) Initial prototypes tested with a few traders• Testing with consumers in various market segments• Testing peeled bananas with natural preservatives; with vacuum sealing (currently peeling under water, blot and seal-no preservatives-stored for 5 days)• Test peeling at source -work with banana union-need for farmer organisation• Utilisation of residues-banana wastes chain• Test more varieties -storage temperatures and optimal harvest stage• Factors responsible for the mismatch between banana varieties grown and market demand is lack of up-to-date and precise market information on the part of the farmers. Using an integrated approach, stakeholder meetings were held involving key value chain actors in the meetings, it was established that the varieties were already being grown but not in major volumes due to limited market information -farmers were not aware of emerging markets that demand certain varieties, especially high-end and export markets that require longer shelf life.• Further analysis is needed to establish the actual post-harvest losses in terms of physical and economic losses.o physical losses include ripening and occur principally during production, but also during transport and at retail level;o economic losses occur when bananas are bruised, resulting in lower prices; this kind of losses are more severe in the post-harvest stages due to inappropriate transport, storage and handling.• Regarding the validation of the charcoal cooler, temperature monitoring over one month revealed that temperature varies inside the cooler, leading to uneven results in terms of shelf life increase.• A gender specialist was involved in the project who managed the integration of gender in all steps of value chain development. As a result, women have become the champions of the project innovations. • How were partners replicating the storage technology o Technology was borrowed from Kenya where it was already working well. o It was cheaper to hire a contractor to build the storage facility but it was not good for scalability hence in the project the team opted to build it with the beneficiaries which ended being more expensive.o The prohibitive cost will hinder the uptake of the technology even though the desire to adopt it exist.• Controlled atmosphere storage technology is an option which can be considered in the futureImproving the utilization of sweetpotato and other root and tuber crops residues as pig feeds:. The project was implemented by CIP in Kamuli and Masaka Districts.Key findings of the project:• Traditional feeding practices result in poor growth rates of pigs • sweetpotato residues are the most common feed for pigs • All SPS diets have ample crude protein levels for growing pigs.• A substantial amount of vines, roots and peelings are wasted at farm level During the plenary discussion, it was revealed that a bio-chemical analysis was done to test impact of pruning but observed that there was need to do more research. It was also learnt that when pruning is done, starch is converted into sugar. It was also agreed that there is need to determine the percentage changes in sugars and comparing the different varieties.Diego Naziri noted that action research and learning approach was based on 3 main pillars (Research, Value Chain Development (VCD) and Capacity building). Sub-project multidisciplinary teams (technology, economics and other social sciences) were important and there was also strong emphasis on multi-stakeholder partnerships and private sector. This approach promoted technology adaptation (feedback), identification of new knowledge gaps/researchable issues and early adoption. Other key lessons were that:• The balance between research, value chain development and capacity building depends on where we are along the impact pathway (no \"one size fits it all\" solution). • PMCA is a useful tool for creating joint vision, trust and partnerships, but requires adaptation for medium-large scale projects. • It is important to engage the private sector at the right time when there is something to offer otherwise they lose interest. • Cross-crop, cross-center collaboration is possible but challenging. Need to share methods and tools, opportunities of cross learning and ideally multi-crop research. • Scoping studies useful to collect key initial information and guide intervention design but it is time consuming and increases overall project costs. • There were mixed feelings about the initial competitive approach.• Adaptive management and donor flexibility was critical in facilitating appropriate response to opportunities and challenge of scoping studies and during implementation. • It is important to allocate adequate resources to gender responsive and communication.• Youth have to be categorized for business models plans so that they are effectively targeted since the needs are different for each category • In the future, capacities of the partners in the project should be built • For easy collaboration, common areas of research and activities have to be chosen • A scientist with strong skill set has to be chosen to backstop the process in any given location to be able to provide solution to challenges in the locations when they came up Keith Tomlins and Ben Bennett of Natural Institute (NRI), University of Greenwich made a joint presentation on current advances in RTB postharvest Innovations focusing on target beneficiaries, commodity coverage, possible themes, areas of innovations and outcomes. It was noted that in dealing with RTB innovations, it was important to deal with environmental waste from RTB processing and addressing labour displacement in postharvest RTB Sector focusing on the need to think of unintended consequences of our innovations.Target beneficiaries 1. Small scale subsistence farmers 2. Small holder farmers with potential for market access 3. Emerging commercial farmers 4. Women and youth 5. Small, medium and (large) scale processors and their employees. 6. Fabricators for equipment (not really beneficiaries but important to make efficient technologies available to the beneficiaries). 7. Value chain actors that improve efficiency. There is much thought on what is going on. 8. Consumers/ end-users -need more integration and work on consumer acceptance. Professor Bennet opined that many different scales and models of RTB enterprise were possible ranging from sole ownership to community development. He noted that RTB processing businesses were not managed efficiently or operating optimally. Therefore, more sub-sector targeting was needed to link sources of demand and supply and there are great opportunities for benchmarking and promoting best practices. To optimize the RTB business models, there is need to take advantage of potentially transformative new web based solutions and internet.Outcomes Improved on-farm, intra-household foods and enterprises.Better policy improved nutrition, shelflife/storage improvement Compliance in an equitable competitive space Improved health Increased options, reduced risk, reduced losses Consumer and market driven research Alignment of innovations with sources of demand: push vs pull balance Traditional products bre-engineered for new marketsDuring plenary discussion, a number of observations were made regarding how best to optimize the opportunities in RTB innovations and create substantial impact:• There is a need to better understand the youth and make sure they are integrated effectively by crop and center research groups. We heard that in Nigeria the farming population is getting old which increases the need to bring the youth on board.• There is a need for market responsive research to remain afloat. Nigeria used to pride itself in aroma of cocoa beans but this has become outdated due to many industrial players manufacturers various flavors.• The new business models need to devise means of push for contract farming. While contract farming has had many challenges, it remains the most widely used model for creating impact to smallholder farmers.• Purposeful breeding geared toward end user preferences is needed to make sure that products are favourable in the market• Most agribusinesses are poorly run Therefore, there is need to work with entrepreneurs to translate innovations and ensure that such innovations succeed in the market.• There are few private companies investing in RTB research so the sector will highly depend on public research.• Cassava is the crop that has potential for processing in developing countries.• What is the integration state of OFSP in the market?• There should be technology innovation pipelines for the industry.• The uptake of gari is not well coordinated.• Most of the SMEs do not know where to go for new products as they are producers and not research • Breeders need to fast identify consumer attributes. Need to engage the consumer in the process of developing a variety. So, the different flagships can help each other as information from consumer preferences will feedback to the breeding programs.• Technologies to reduce PHL. How to adapt it to different crops• Develop crops that are suitable for market needs e.g suitability for mechanical peeling• The record on the adoption of CG varieties is poor. What is the linkage between our research work, extension and market e.g some varieties have a huge yielding gap. As we do product development, there is need to talk with users either farmers or processors.• End-user traits should be measurable; need for quantification of sensory qualities; handling qualities and processing qualities.• Need to make sure there is empowerment of women and youth to ensure impact.• Need to asses any possibility of cross-crop product development, e.g flours and juices.• CC4.1 and 5.1 can work together by developing tools to predict future demand in CC4.1 at scale, link 5.1 to study adoption and impacts.• CC 4.1 and CC 2.1 need to link in order to increase dissemination.• FP5 and CC4.1 can link to collaborate in developing methods for gender responsive technologies. Also need to look at consumer preference studies and need to look and gender segregated preferences in 5.3.• Considering RTBs as shopping malls, there is need to increase communication about our products through dialogues and this need to start with demand side which is FP5.• Need to look at the perspective of the farmer. Have the challenge of negative perceptions about our roots and tubers changed and how to make commercially viable. Need to emphasize social research aspects.• Need for concerted efforts to disseminate outputs, products.• There is need for a mechanism to inform research agenda of FP2 and FP3 by creating demand and supply of research knowledge.• FP5 informs our dissemination agenda.• There is need for resources to facilitate collaboration between flagships and breeders.Postharvest scientists need to work with breeders but there is lack of resources.• The breeding process has been targeting constraints like drought, disease but with limited effort on post-harvest handling. Need to ensure end-user quality traits are being incorporated in the breeding process. Interpersonal relationships are also key.• Cost Benefit analyses for RTB processing equipment/machine. I. Type 1: Start-up funding for clusters that need to better shape the vision, set-up the portfolio, bring the team together and develop a resource mobilization strategy. Funding level is up to $200,000 II. Type 2: Cross-cutting and cross-center cluster funding between $ 400,000-$800,000 on a yearly basis for 2017-2019. Level per cluster will be defined before clusters are invited for \"fund request-submission\".III. Type 3: Thematic areas that are crosscutting and spread over CC and crop specific clusters. Funding level is up to $400,000.A Cluster will be a platform for identifying and developing fundable projects focusing on multicrop and cross-cutting challenges and opportunities based on ideas from the workshop and additional ideas and specific follow-on to ongoing or recent research (\"low-hanging fruits\"), where the Cluster team is best positioned.Through brainstorming, participants raised various possible ways of non-traditional funding:• Rockefeller Foundation which is already funding some work on cassava in Nigeria and tomatoes in Kenya.• MasterCard foundation: MasterCard is interested in job creation for youth, food availability and food processing.• National partners e.g Governments because RTB are major crops for food security.• Private sector [Multinational companies] can find ways of cross synergies.• Africa Trust Fund which is looking at employment and food security.• Impact Investors who invest money in value chains though may not be interested in research.• The Netherland government which is currently funding IFDC. They are doing work that can fit in what the cluster is doing.• Using link that are usually engaged in advertising call for proposals.• It was suggested that there should be a resource mobilization office.To be able to attract funding through the proposed or possible funders and form new partnerships, the following actions were suggested:• Complete mapping of deliverable of clusters • Identify potential funding sources• Prepare funding proposals• Need to bring in experts• Mobilization of funds from the centers and centrally by Cluster Team Members should continue.• Need to discuss why we need to remain loyal even when individual organisations get funds from other sources.• Need to keep inter-partner relationships to ensure complementary skills sets as a prerequisite for winning proposals Participants suggested a code of conduct for members to follow in order to create harmony and meet the cluster objectives. A code of conduct was needed because the team comprises of people from different organizations, different countries and different cultures. Some of the suggested conduct are -Mutual respect -Transparency -Professionalism -Commitment -HonestyMembers be champions within their respective centers.Dietmar Stoian thanked all the participants for putting in all their efforts. He noted that this was very important in ensuring positive transformation from ENDURE to CoA 4.1. Ben Bennett and Keith Tomlins were specially recognized for having spared their valuable time to be part of the workshop and for the rich contributions they made. It was noted that the outcome of the workshop was very satisfying as it had raised key inputs to inform the development of a thoughtful strategy.Simon Heck, the FP4 leader encouraged the team to remain professional in order to be able to acquire the resources needed to actualize the work the cluster is capable of doing. He also thanked the government of Uganda for hosting the partner research organisations in the country.A vote of thanks was given by Busie Maziya-Dixon, the CoA 4.1 Cluster leader who repeated the importance of cross-centre collaboration for the success of the cluster. This was demonstrated by IITA working with the CIP support staff to successfully organize this workshop.","tokenCount":"3846"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0753089016.json b/data/part_2/0753089016.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5a1591354cf173991869d7b2133734becbaef45c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0753089016.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b86d256e6a38723f900df552acdcbb28","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/d769025a-ccee-4d57-a65a-98ca50c0fc4b/retrieve","id":"-878603974"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"a0bd8b36-3025-46f8-8384-063720311992","pagecount":"44","content":"esta contribuye a la producción de alimentos en el país. Por la evidencia recogida, reconoce el grave riesgo en que se encuentra la biodiversidad en las chacras y la necesidad de fortalecer los sistemas campesinos de producción de semillas.La edición de LEISA revista de agroecología 30-1 ha sido posible gracias al apoyo de la Agencia Sueca para el Desarrollo Internacional (Styrelsen för internationellt utvecklingssamarbete -Swedish International Development Agency-SIDA) Los editores han sido muy cuidadosos en editar rigurosamente los artículos incluidos en la revista. Sin embargo, las ideas y opiniones contenidas en dichos artículos son de entera responsabilidad de los autores.Invitamos a los lectores a que hagan circular los artículos de la revista. Si es necesaria la reproducción total o parcial de algunos de estos artículos, no olviden mencionar como fuente a LEISA revista de agroecología y enviarnos una copia de la publicación en la que han sido reproducidos.LEISA es miembro de esta red mundial, integrada por siete organizaciones responsables de la edición de revistas regionales que proporcionan información sobre agricultura sostenible a pequeña escala en todo el mundo:• FARMING MATTERS (Asuntos Agrícolas, edición internacional, en inglés) • LEISA revista de agroecología (América Latina, en español) • LEISA India (en inglés, canarés, tamil, hindi, telugu y oriya) • AGRIDAPE (África Occidental, en francés) • AGRICULTURAS Experiencias en agroecología (Brasil, en portugués) • LEISA China (China, en chino mandarín)• BAOBAB (África del Este, en inglés) ¿Semillas o granos? Superando la dicotomía Paulo Petersen, Luciano Silveira, Emanoel Dias, Amaury Santos, Fernando Fleury Curado Frente a las políticas gubernamentales de producción convencional de semillas, en 1996 ASA-PB comenzó a producir semillas de variedades locales de frijol en Paraiba, Brasil. Esta acción ha logrado establecer los bancos de semillas y ha contado con el apoyo de los campesinos, la iglesia y otras organizaciones locales.En junio de 2011 (LEISA volumen 27 número 3) anunciábamos haber cumplido 15 años de publicación continua de esta revista de difusión de experiencias concretas, reflexiones y opiniones autorizadas sobre la agroecología como un nuevo paradigma científico de la agricultura sostenible, tanto ecológica como socialmente. Esto equivale a pensar la agricultura en términos compatibles con la productividad sostenible de los agroecosistemas, en beneficio de los actores directos del quehacer agropecuario: los agricultores familiares campesinos.En aquella ocasión presentamos nuestra voluntad de ir construyendo nuestra autonomía económica, para lo cual solicitamos la contribución monetaria de nuestros suscriptores interesados en recibir la versión impresa de LEISA. Estas contribuciones fueron solicitadas solamente para cubrir parte de los costos del envío postal de la revista impresa y se mantienen ahora con el mismo propósito, mientras que la versión electrónica sigue siendo de libre acceso. Estamos en 2014 y por los cambios en la cooperación internacional al desarrollo es cada vez más difícil financiar proyectos no lucrativos, como es el caso de nuestra revista, por lo que debemos optar por soluciones que nos permitan continuar con la publicación de la revista por medios electrónicos e impresos. ¿Cómo lograrlo?La amplia gama de lectores de LEISA está compuesta por agricultores líderes, investigadores académicos y profesionales de las ciencias agropecuarias y sociales, emprendedores rurales, estudiantes y otros, quienes la consideran como una publicación de su interés editorial 4 | LEISA revista de agroecología | 30-1 Diversidad de semillas de frijol y maíz Red Guardianes de Semillas, Ecuador A ctualmente causa gran preocupación la rápida disminución de la agrobiodiversidad y la falta de medidas para protegerla. Las políticas agrarias promueven, por lo general, la agricultura comercial basada en el monocultivo de grandes extensiones de tierra. Por otro lado, la rápida expansión de los organismos genéticamente modificados (OGM) y la distorsión en la aplicación de los derechos de propiedad intelectual amenazan a la agrobiodiversidad e impactan el paisaje rural y las diversas especies de flora y fauna que lo pueblan, incluyendo a los parientes silvestres de los cultivos y del ganado -recurso genético de mucho valor para la conservación de la vitalidad de las especies domesticadas-así como a los microorganismos y polinizadores naturales -especialmente las abejas que se encuentran ahora en grave riesgo de extinción como lo señala John Wightman (LEISA 28-1, p. 23)-. Todas estas prácticas y políticas son causa de la disminución y, lo más grave, están también produciendo la desaparición de muchas especies de plantas y animales, y del conocimiento implícito de sus usos y manejo.Pero la buena noticia es que ahora muchas iniciativas para preservar y manejar la biodiversidad de la agricultura se han iniciado en todo el mundo. Sobre todo se constata que a diferencia de la segunda mitad del siglo XX, las organizaciones internacionales -especialmente desde 2008 ante el alza de precio de los alimentos-reconocen el valor de la biodiversidad para la sostenibilidad de los cultivos alimenticios en todo el mundo. Y en este marco otorgan un reconocimiento y valoración a la función que cumple la agricultura campesina en la conservación de la biodiversidad cultivada o agrobiodiversidad y de sus parientes silvestres.Como sabemos, la agricultura campesina ocupa el 35,8% de la superficie de la superficie agrícola total en América Latina (Altieri y otros, p. 5). Pero lo positivo para la conservación de la biodiversidad es que las familias agricultoras campesinas o de pequeña escala son en muchos casos los \"guardianes\" o \"custodios\" de las semillas, cuyo rol no es solamente pasivo, pues entre ellos se encuentran los llamados \"locos\" o \"curiosos\" que no cesan de innovar sus variedades. En este punto las llamadas redes de semillas que se han generado en varios países de América Latina, cumplen una función muy importante como organización de los productores campesinos para tener una presencia política y económica, a escala nacional e internacional, en defensa de los recursos genéticos de sus cultivos (Borja y otros, p. 16) y también como una forma de autovaloración del patrimonio heredado y del cual son responsables.Aquí es importante recordar que la generación de nuevas variedades y el mantenimiento de la agrobiodiversidad dependen del manejo de la semilla, pues este recurso transmite la información genética de cada variedad o especie que se concreta en una nueva planta. Es ahí donde se hace evidente el valor del productor campesino \"custodio de la semilla\" por preservar los genes de cultivos de importancia para la alimentación humana (Rojas y otros, p. 19). No hay que olvidar que los recursos genéticos son considerados como el cuarto recurso de la producción agrícola, y que su diversidad depende de que haya un gran número de productores de diversas variedades de semillas, ya que si estos disminuyen el riesgo de reducción de la biodiversidad de los cultivos será mayor. Estos productores son los campesinos y su reconocimiento obliga a otros regímenes de producción y abastecimiento de semillas, como se está dando en Paraiba, Brasil (Petersen y otros, p. 13).Para el mantenimiento de la biodiversidad agrícola, la agricultura ecológica -practicada por los productores familiares o campesinos-junto a los avances de la agroecología, forman un binomio o yunta de trabajo que permite vislumbrar alternativas posibles para no solo un nuevo paradigma productivo, sino nuevos enfoques políticos que garanticen un desarrollo rural innovador. Y aquí conviene citar las palabras de Víctor Manuel Toledo (\"Regresemos al agro\" en Cuadernos Verdes del Colegio Verde de Villa de Leyva, Colombia, núm. 5, 1992):\"La agricultura ecológica no intenta un romántico (e inviable) retorno a las formas preindustriales de producción. Lo que busca es implementar una estrategia que modernice el agro a partir de un manejo adecuado de la naturaleza y del reconocimiento de la tradición rural…\"LEISA revista de agroecología | 30-1 | 5 biodiversidad/agricultura campesina El papel de la biodiversidad en la agricultura campesina en América Latina E n América Latina la agricultura, que ocupa el 35,8% de su superficie total, se expande a expensas de los bosques naturales. Los bosques naturales se deforestan a una tasa de 4,3 millones de hectáreas anuales para dar paso a la agricultura de monocultivo para la exportación y al incremento de pasturas, plantaciones de eucaliptus y cultivos como la soya -mayoritariamente transgénica-, la caña de azúcar y la palma africana. Estos cultivos, ahora llamados flexibles (flex crops), crecen a una tasa anual de 3,25%. Esta expansión agroindustrial no solo homogeneiza los paisajes y deja una inmensa huella ecológica, sino que también desplaza a las poblaciones rurales -mayormente integradas por campesinos productores de alimentos-que migran a las ciudades a una tasa anual del 2%, lo que agrava los problemas sociales en las urbes y debilita la capacidad de autosuficiencia alimentaria de la región.A pesar de esta devastación ecológica impulsada por el modelo económico capitalista-extractivista, aún persiste en América Latina una población campesina estimada de 65 millones de personas, constituida principalmente por producto-MiGuEL A. ALtiERi, CLARA i. NiChOLLS, RENé MONtALBA res familiares a pequeña escala, que tienen fincas menores a dos hectáreas y que ocupan menos del 30% de la superficie agrícola, pero que producen más del 50% de los alimentos básicos que se consumen en la región. Por ejemplo, en Ecuador el sector campesino ocupa más del 50% de la superficie dedicada a cultivos alimentarios como maíz, frijol, cebada y ají. En México los campesinos ocupan no menos del 70% de la superficie cultivada con maíz y 60% de la superficie donde crece el frijol (ETC Group, 2009). No menos del 50% de estos campesinos aún mantienen agroecosistemas diversificados producto de siglos de coevolución biocultural, adaptados localmente y manejados con tecnologías ingeniosas que han permitido a miles de comunidades contar con seguridad alimentaria, conservar la agrobiodiversidad clave y mantener formas nativas de identidad cultural y organización social (Koohafkan y Altieri, 2010).La prevalencia de millones de hectáreas en forma de campos elevados, terrazas, policultivos, sistemas agroforestales y silvopastoriles representan estrategias indígenas exitosas de adaptación a ambientes marginales y cambiantes, constituyendo Después del huracán Mitch en honduras: derrumbes en campos con monocultivos (izquierda) y resiliencia de los sistemas diversificados bajo agroforestería y cultivos de cobertura (derecha) M. Altieri Variedades de papas nativas de los Andes animalesyplantasdeperu.blogspot.com Aun cuando los monocultivos de exportación conocidos como flex crops crecen sin parar causando devastación ecológica, la agricultura campesina de pequeña escala sigue produciendo más de la mitad de los alimentos que se consumen en América Latina en agroecosistemas diversificados que aprovechan y mantienen la biodiversidad y el rol ecológico esencial que esta cumple.6 | LEISA revista de agroecología | 30-1 biodiversidad/agricultura campesina un símbolo de la creatividad de miles de agricultores. Además estos microcosmos de agricultura tradicional son modelos de resiliencia y sostenibilidad ya que minimizan riesgos, estabilizan los rendimientos, promueven diversidad nutricional, maximizan retornos con el uso de recursos locales, limitan el uso de insumos externos y mantienen una oferta alimentaria local todo el año. Estos beneficios están ligados a los altos niveles de biodiversidad que caracterizan a estos sistemas tradicionales, ya que la regulación interna de su funcionamiento es un producto de la biodiversidad y las interacciones o sinergismos entre sus componentes.Todas las especies de plantas, animales y microorganismos existentes dentro de un ecosistema y que interactúan optimizando procesos ecológicos claves, constituyen la biodiversidad. En los agroecosistemas es posible distinguir cuatro tipos de biodiversidad: productiva (cultivos y animales), destructiva (plagas, malezas, enfermedades), neutral (herbívoros no plaga que sirven de alimento a predadores) y benéfica o funcional como los polinizadores, los enemigos naturales, las lombrices, los microorganismos del suelo, etc., que cumplen roles ecológicos importantes en procesos tales como la polinización, el control natural de plagas, el reciclaje de nutrientes, etc. En general, el grado de biodiversidad en los agroecosistemas depende del mantenimiento de sistemas de conocimiento sobre manejo y formas culturales de usos (alimenticios y no alimenticios) de los cultivos y especies silvestres, así como de varios factores y características de los sistemas de cultivos, como son:• El número de subsistemas productivos (huerta, chacra, pasturas y praderas, zonas sin cultivo) y espacios naturales. • El número de especies y variedades vegetales y razas animales desplegadas en el tiempo y el espacio por el campesino. • Maneras en que los agricultores asocian los cultivos y cómo integran a los animales. • La permanencia temporal de cultivos anuales y perennes dentro del agroecosistema.• El tipo e intensidad del manejo, (por ejemplo químico versus orgánico). • La diversidad y tipo de arvenses en el agroecosistema y de vegetación natural en sus alrededores (por ejemplo si al cultivo lo rodean bosques o monocultivos transgénicos).Lo importante y necesario es identificar el tipo de biodiversidad que se desea mantener y estimular para prestar servicios ecológicos claves para la producción y definir así las mejores prácticas agroecológicas que fomentan los componentes deseados de biodiversidad (figura 1).La investigación agroecológica ha demostrado que la agrobiodiversidad es clave para que el agroecosistema funcione y provea servicios de apoyo -por ejemplo fertilidad de suelos-y de regulación -por ejemplo control biológico de plagas-. Todos estos procesos de renovación y regulación, reciclaje y almacenamiento de nutrientes, control del microclima, regulación del flujo y almacenamiento de agua, desintoxicación de químicos nocivos, etc., están mediados biológicamente, por lo que su persistencia depende del mantenimiento de la biodiversidad. Por ejemplo, la disponibilidad de nitrógeno y fósforo para las plantas depende de poblaciones de bacterias fijadoras de N y de micorrizas presentes en el suelo, lo que a su vez depende de la adición de materia orgánica. La regulación de la abundancia de organismos indeseables depende de biota benéfica que aumenta en policultivos que proveen hábitat. Cuando estos organismos y sus servicios se pierden debido a la simplificación biológica -establecimiento de monocultivos-los costos económicos y ambientales son altos ya que incluyen la necesidad de abastecer a los cultivos con agroquímicos caros y tóxicos.Los agroecólogos están de acuerdo en que mientras más diverso es el agroecosistema, más tienden los agroecosistemas a prevenir las explosiones de especies invasoras, aumentar la estabilidad y la resiliencia frente a disturbios y cambios ambientales o climáticos y a mejorar su capacidad de subsidiar su propio funcionamiento: reciclaje de nutrientes, regulación biológica de plagas, productividad, etc. Si se elimina un grupo funcionalFigura 1. Tipos de biodiversidad funcional en el agroecosistema campesino, su función y sistemas de manejo para incrementarla ¿Cómo manejan los campesinos la biodiversidad?Los campesinos aumentan y manejan la diversidad de sus agroecosistemas a tres niveles (Altieri y otros, 1987): Nivel paisajístico: muchos campesinos practican una \"agricultura de mosaicos\" caracterizada por campos pequeños insertos en una matriz paisajística dominada por vegetación natural. Para grupos étnicos como los p'urhepecha que viven en la región del lago Pátzcuaro en Michoacán, México, la cosecha silvestre es parte de un complejo modelo de subsistencia basado en múltiples usos de los recursos naturales. Esta gente utiliza más de 224 especies de plantas silvestres para sus necesidades dietéticas, medicinales, y energéticas.Nivel predial: los sistemas de cultivo múltiple constituyen sistemas agrícolas diversificados en el tiempo y el espacio tomando la forma de cultivos en franjas, cultivos intercalados, cultivos con cubierta vegetal, sistemas agroforestales y silvopastorales (véase recuadro). Entre las ventajas potenciales que surgen del diseño inteligente de estos policultivos se encuentran: la disminución de la población de plagas de insectos por enemigos naturales albergados en ambientes complejos, la supresión de malezas por el sombreado de doseles más densos o por alelopatías, el uso más eficiente de los nutrientes del suelo y la mejora de la productividad por unidad de superficie.Nivel genético: muchos agroecosistemas tradicionales se ubican en centros de origen de cultivos, por lo tanto contienen numerosas variedades criollas de maíz, frijoles, papas, granos nativos, raíces, frutas y otras plantas alimenticias altamente adaptadas incluyendo sus parientes silvestres. Los campesinos mantienen gran diversidad genética de cultivos en forma de variedades tradicionales y en muchos sistemas siembran dosRotaciones de cultivos: diversidad temporal en forma de secuencias de cereales y leguminosas. El suelo está cubierto y los nutrientes se conservan de una estación a otra, y los ciclos vitales de las plagas de insectos, enfermedades y malezas se interrumpen.Policultivos: sistemas de cultivo en el que dos o más especies de cultivos se plantan dentro de cierta proximidad espacial, resultando en complementariedades biológicas que mejoran la eficiencia en el uso de nutrientes y la regulación de plagas mejorando la estabilidad del rendimiento de los cultivos.Sistemas agroforestales: los árboles que crecen junto con cultivos anuales, además de modificar el microclima, mantienen y mejoran la fertilidad del suelo; algunos árboles contribuyen a la fijación de N y la absorción de nutrientes de los horizontes profundos del suelo, mientras que su hojarasca ayuda a reponer los nutrientes del suelo, manteniendo la materia orgánica y sosteniendo cadenas tróficas complejas en el suelo.Cultivos de cobertura y mulch: el uso de cultivos puros o mixtos de gramíneas-leguminosas bajo los árboles frutales puede reducir la erosión y proporcionar nutrientes al suelo y mejorar el control biológico de plagas. En agricultura de conservación, aplanar mezclas de cultivos de cobertura sobre la superficie del suelo es una estrategia para reducir la erosión del suelo y reducir las fluctuaciones en la humedad y la temperatura del suelo, mejorar la calidad del suelo y posibilitar la supresión de malezas por alelopatía, lo que resulta en mayores rendimientos.Mezclas de cultivos y ganadería: una alta producción de biomasa y un óptimo reciclaje de nutrientes se puede lograr mediante la integración de cultivos y animales. La producción animal que integra arbustos forrajeros plantados en alta densidad, intercalados con pastos altamente productivos y con árboles maderables, combinados todos en un sistema que puede ser directamente pastoreado por el ganado, aumenta la productividad total sin necesidad de insumos externos.Izquierda: sistema agroforestal de cacao; centro: sistema quesungual en Honduras; derecha: policultivo maíz y frijol como ejemplo de diversificación específica fuentes diversas en internet; M. Altieri 8 | LEISA revista de agroecología | 30-1 biodiversidad/agricultura campesina o más variedades de cada cultivo. El uso de múltiples variedades de cada cultivo proporciona diversidad intra e interespecífica, mejorando así la seguridad de las cosechas. La diversidad genética hace que los cultivos sean resilientes y menos vulnerables a condiciones de estrés biótico (plagas, enfermedades) como abiótico (sequías y heladas). La diversidad genética actúa como un seguro para enfrentar el cambio ambiental o las necesidades sociales y económicas futuras, ya que la riqueza varietal disminuye la variabilidad de la producción.La diversificación paisajística, especifica y genética, potencia los efectos positivos de la biodiversidad en la productividad, derivados de los crecientes efectos de la complementariedad entre las especies de plantas y animales, resultando así en un mejor aprovechamiento de la luz solar, el agua, los recursos del suelo y la regulación natural de las poblaciones de plagas. La mayoría de los esquemas campesinos de diversificación son multifuncionales y su adopción generalmente implica cambios favorables en diversos componentes de los sistemas de producción. En otras palabras, funcionan como una \"plataforma ecológica giratoria\" mediante la activación de procesos clave tales como el reciclaje, el control biológico, el antagonismo, la alelopatía, etc., esenciales para la sostenibilidad y la productividad de los agroecosistemas.Las cuatro propiedades que emergen de las estrategias de diversificación campesina resaltan la importancia de la diversidad que se traduce en heterogeneidad ecológica, lo que a su vez incrementa las opciones. Así, la biodiversidad proporciona un \"seguro\" o sirve como un \"amortiguador\" frente a fluctuaciones ambientales debido a que la diversidad de cultivos, árboles y animales responden de manera diferente a las fluctuaciones, condicionando una comunidad más predecible o fomentando las propiedades del ecosistema. Aún más, los sistemas campesinos agroecológicos no son intensivos en el uso de capital, trabajo o insumos químicos, sino más bien, al propiciar altos niveles de biodiversidad, intensifican la eficiencia de procesos biológicos clave para mantener la salud de suelos y cultivos, la resiliencia y la productividad. Por ello, en agroecología se conoce a estos sistemas como \"agricultura de procesos\". Existe un potencial enorme en la colaboración entre científicos y comunidades rurales a través del diálogo de saberes entendido como el encuentro del conocimiento agroecológico tradicional y el conocimiento científico, para contribuir a la producción sostenible de alimentos sanos y a la recuperación de los ecosistemas.A pesar del serio debate de las últimas décadas sobre la sostenibilidad rural, tanto la investigación como la transferencia de tecnología y la asistencia técnica continúan fomentando modelos de Revolución Verde, sin un análisis completo de sus efectos ambientales y sociales. Una manifestación visible de esto es la aplicación generalizada de paquetes tecnológicos que ignoran el contexto productivo de cada región. Una opción viable para la reconversión de la producción agropecuaria y la restauración ecológica de tierras degradadas es la generación de tecnologías apropiadas para las comunidades rurales mediante procesos de investigación participativa. El ingrediente fundamental de estos procesos incluyentes es la comprensión y valoración del conocimiento campesino.Aunque en América Latina la tradición indígena es rica en ejemplos exitosos de agricultura basada en el conocimiento y buen manejo de la naturaleza, no todas las culturas campesinas mantienen vivo este saber. Por otra parte, la agroecología y la restauración ecológica, que gozan de gran dinamismo y creciente interés académico, son disciplinas científicas relativamente jóvenes y deben apoyarse en otros desarrollos, más prácticos que teóricos. Es necesario mejorar el actual conocimiento sobre métodos para recuperar la base de recursos naturales de las comunidades con el fin de sustentar los procesos productivos y culturales. Esto requiere de investigación con amplia participación social y métodos innovadores.Los dos estudios de caso que presentamos relatan procesos de colaboración entre comunidades rurales e investigadores externos para la generación y aplicación de conocimiento con el objetivo de producir alimentos en forma sostenible y al mismo tiempo restaurar tierras degradadas y recuperar la biodiversidad de los ecosistemas.En la microcuenca Los Sainos, ubicada en la Cordillera Occidental colombiana, la transformación del paisaje boscoso empezó en la primera mitad del siglo XX con la extracción de las maderas valiosas y la tala gradual del bosque, hasta dejar una cobertura forestal mínima en los filos de montaña y corredores ribereños.A comienzos de la década de 1970, la producción agrícola basada en sistemas agroforestales con café y una alta diversidad de especies que satisfacían las necesidades nutricionales de las familias, cambió en poco tiempo, impulsada por la demanda de los mercados urbanos, hacia monocultivos muy rentables de frutas como tomate de árbol (Cyphomandra betacea), lulo (Solanum quitoensis) y granadilla (Passiflora ligularis), todos ellos altamente dependientes de insumos químicos. Pocos años después, la prosperidad de la economía local basada en monocultivos terminó repentinamente con la aparición de Panorámica de la región de la Cordillera Occidental, donde se localizan las experiencias campesinas Enrique Murgueitio R. -CIPAV 10 | LEISA revista de agroecología | 30-1 biodiversidad/agricultura campesina múltiples problemas fitosanitarios. Esta crisis productiva vino acompañada de la rápida expansión del ganado bovino hacia las cabeceras de las nacientes de agua y el acceso libre de los animales a las franjas ribereñas. A finales de la década de 1980 la crisis productiva se agravó con la falta de agua, la pérdida de la soberanía alimentaria, el deterioro de los suelos y los conflictos sociales por el acceso a los recursos naturales.Muchas familias consideraron vender sus predios y migrar a otras localidades o a centros urbanos, pero un pequeño grupo optó por un cambio integral del paradigma ambiental, productivo y social. Motivados por su fuerte arraigo a la tierra y con el acompañamiento institucional de la Fundación CIPAV, la comunidad de Los Sainos asumió el reto de ser protagonista en el diseño de un modelo propio de desarrollo rural. El trabajo de CIPAV y la comunidad se fundamentó en el respeto, la confianza y la amistad.Los productores adoptaron prácticas agroecológicas y sistemas productivos diversificados tales como bancos mixtos de forraje, cercas vivas, barreras rompeviento, sistemas silvopastoriles y arreglos agroforestales complejos. La producción vegetal y animal se reforzaron mutuamente en la medida en que los policultivos aumentaban la oferta y variedad de alimentos para las familias y a la vez demandaban una mayor fertilización orgánica. La seguridad alimentaria y el flujo de ingresos de las familias de la comunidad mejoraron con la adaptación de tecnologías sencillas para el manejo de ganado bovino semiestabulado, la producción escalonada de cerdos con recursos locales, la piscicultura de pequeña escala y el manejo de aves de corral.Paralelamente, la comunidad generó, validó y adaptó tecnologías muy sencillas para la construcción de viviendas e instalaciones pecuarias, la cosecha de aguas lluvias, la descontaminación productiva de aguas servidas, el uso de biogás para el reemplazo parcial de la leña en las cocinas, el tratamiento del agua con filtros lentos de arena y la conservación de los suelos. Todos los proyectos de investigación que llevaron a cabo la comunidad y CIPAV durante más de dos décadas involucraron a adultos, jóvenes y niños en calidad de coinvestigadores locales. Esta interacción y retroalimentación permanentes permitieron generar conocimiento científico y tecnológico adaptado a las condiciones del sitio. Al mismo tiempo se formó un grupo local de personas de diferentes edades con aptitudes e intereses en diferentes disciplinas.Sustentada en valores compartidos y el respeto mutuo, la relación de trabajo de la comunidad campesina de la microcuenca Los Sainos y CIPAV ha perdurado por más de 25 años, con resultados positivos para ambas partes. La comunidad se ha fortalecido a través del empoderamiento y el liderazgo que surgen de los procesos prolongados de investigación participativa. El conocimiento generado a través de la investigación participativa para la gestión y el manejo de los recursos locales ha servido como modelo e inspiración para miles de personas.El territorio mismo se ha transformado en la medida en que los bosques han sido restaurados para mejorar la regulación hidrológica. Ha aumentado la conectividad entre relictos boscosos, gracias a lo cual han mejorado las perspectivas para la conservación de la biodiversidad. Varias familias han cedido terrenos productivos para la regeneración del bosque y han constituido pequeñas reservas naturales de la sociedad civil que hoy son reconocidas en Colombia como modelos de conservaciónproducción. Existe además un sistema de control interno que vela por la continuidad de estos procesos.En los sistemas agroforestales de la microcuenca Los Sainos destaca la alta diversidad de especies vegetales. Plantas tradicionales destinadas al autoconsumo familiar y al mercado como maíz, frijol, yuca, plátano, arracacha, piña, lulo y granadilla, se asocian hoy con arbustos forrajeros como botón de oro (Tithonia diversifolia), nacedero (Trichanthera gigantea), chachafruto (Erythrina edulis), ramio (Boehmeria nivea) y morera (Morus alba), y con árboles nativos como chagualo (Myrsine guianensis), guayabo (Psidium guajava), arboloco (Montanoa quadrangularis) y nogal (Cordia alliodora). Esta biodiversidad planeada coexiste con la biodiversidad asociada, que incluye a los organismos polinizadores y artrópodos benéficos, que a su vez regulan a los insectos herbívoros y otras plagas del sistema. Con el tiempo, los productores de la microcuenca Los Sainos han dejado de considerar a los artrópodos y otros componentes de la biodiversidad local como enemigos reales o potenciales y han empezado a verlos como aliados.La estructura vegetal compleja que resulta al combinar varios estratos de plantas protege el suelo con una gruesa capa de residuos vegetales y contribuye a la formación de materia Cuadro 1. Contribuciones de la investigación participativa LEISA revista de agroecología | 30-1 | 11 biodiversidad/agricultura campesina orgánica estable que se conserva en el suelo gracias a la labranza moderada y al abandono del fuego como práctica de limpieza. Por otra parte, la asociación de especies de ciclo productivo corto con árboles de larga vida y madera valiosa, permite a las familias tener un flujo de caja a través de la producción de alimentos y un ahorro de mediano plazo representado en la madera. La suma de estas características reduce la vulnerabilidad del sistema frente a las lluvias torrenciales y sequías por lo cual es una herramienta importante para la adaptación de los productores campesinos al cambio climático. Estas ideas innovadoras se fortalecen con proyectos de investigación participativa y proyectos universitarios de grado (pregrado y maestría) en temas como fenología de plantas nativas, reciclaje de nutrientes, alimentación de animales domésticos con recursos locales y abejas criollas, entre otros. A través de las redes sociales e intercambios permanentes, los sistemas que aprovechan y favorecen la biodiversidad han alcanzado un amplio radio de influencia en la medida en que cada vez más productores campesinos e indígenas, junto con técnicos y profesionales de varias disciplinas y de todas las regiones del país, han visitado la localidad para conocer este modelo de producción sostenible.La planificación predial de las propiedades se sigue llevando a cabo para garantizar la soberanía alimentaria y el uso racional de los recursos naturales -suelo, agua y biodiversidada través de sistemas agroforestales cada vez más complejos. En una comunidad que hace 25 años tenía conflictos por el acceso al agua, hoy existe una oferta hídrica suficiente para 75 familias. Es digno de destacar que los sistemas agroforestales de la microcuenca han evolucionado en forma paralela con la conciencia ecológica de la comunidad campesina. Hoy existe un fuerte arraigo por la tierra y una valoración de la cultura rural, que se transmite a las nuevas generaciones para lograr el relevo generacional y la continuidad de los procesos.Estudio de caso 2: reconversión de los sistemas productivos en reservas de la sociedad civil de la Cordillera Occidental de Colombia Aunque las reservas naturales de la sociedad civil han existido formalmente en Colombia durante más de dos décadas, solo fueron reconocidas como áreas naturales protegidas de carácter privado en el Sistema Nacional de Áreas Protegidas (SINAP) en 2010. Si bien en la mayoría de los casos la iniciativa de constituir un predio como reserva surge de la familia propietaria, las reservas situadas en los municipios de Versalles, El Dovio y Bolívar, en el norte del Valle del Cauca, tuvieron un proceso diferente, liderado por organizaciones de base comunitaria (Corpoversalles, Acerg y Ecofuturo) que vieron en esta figura la posibilidad de generar procesos locales de conservación.Este trabajo, que se inició en 2003, ha permitido constituir 50 reservas que en la actualidad avanzan en la implementación de sus planes de manejo. Estos predios suman alrededor de 1.200 hectáreas que se destinan a la conservación y recuperación de ecosistemas naturales y al mejoramiento agroecológico de los sistemas productivos. Las reservas conservan especies de flora y fauna importantes en la región: árboles amenazados de extinción como el medio comino (Aniba robusta), molinillo o copachí (Magnolia hernandezii), palma de cera (Ceroxylon alpinum), roble (Quercus humboldtii) y cedro rosado (Cedrela montana); aves endémicas como la clorocrisa multicolor (Clorochrysa nitidissima) y mamíferos muy escasos en los paisajes rurales como el mono aullador (Alouatta seniculus), entre otras.El trabajo desarrollado en los agroecosistemas ha permitido negociar con las familias propietarias la liberación de nuevas áreas para la conservación. Dado que la mayoría de las propiedades son medianas y pequeñas, la cesión de terrenos para este fin exige incrementar la productividad en las áreas más aptas para la ganadería, la agricultura comercial y la producción para el autoconsumo. Solo así es posible asegurar que las áreas más sensibles se destinen a la regeneración natural, a la restauración de las fuentes de agua o a establecer corredores entre fragmentos de bosque.Con el tiempo las familias propietarias de los núcleos de reservas se han convertido en referentes para los productores vecinos, que se interesan en los cambios productivos y en los espacios de participación tales como intercambios, encuentros de capacitación y ejercicios de planeación y ordenamiento del territorio. En los últimos años esto ha motivado a otras familias a hacer de sus predios nuevas reservas naturales.En síntesis, las propuestas clásicas de conservación no son atractivas para todos propietarios de la región, pero el mejoramiento de las actividades agropecuarias sí lo es. Las organizaciones articuladoras de reservas naturales en los municipios de Versalles, El Dovio y Bolívar (Valle del Cauca) han demostrado que es factible aumentar la eficiencia agroecológica y al mismo tiempo restaurar áreas de ecosistemas naturales.Las comunidades campesinas de la región andina enfrentan retos enormes para mantener su estilo de vida y su cultura. El modelo urbano dominante, la globalización de los mercados y el cambio climático ponen en riesgo a cientos de miles de familias para quienes el campo es mucho más que una actividad generadora de ingresos.La agroecología y la restauración ecológica, dos ciencias relativamente jóvenes, pueden apoyar el desarrollo rural sustentable si se orientan hacia la construcción de nuevo conocimiento mediante el diálogo de saberes entre investigadores y habitantes del campo. Todos pueden beneficiarse de esta interacción, como lo evidencian estos dos casos en las montañas de Colombia.Investigador CIPAV -jgiraldo@cipav.org.coCoordinadora del Área de Restauración Ecológica CIPAV zoraida@cipav.org.coDirector Ejecutivo CIPAV -enriquem@cipav.org.co Sandra M. Giraldo Ecofuturo -smilegirald@yahoo.es Policultivo agroforestal con más de 20 especies para la seguridad alimentaria humana y animal investigado en forma participativa en la microcuenca Los Sainos, El Dovio (Colombia)Zoraida Calle -CIPAV 12 | LEISA revista de agroecología | 30-1 biodiversidad/agricultura campesina Manejo de la diversidad: estrategia para el autoabastecimiento y la comercialización E duardo y Salomón son dos campesinos que comercializan su producción en los mercados orgánicos de Xalapa y Coatepec, ciudades del estado de Veracruz, México. Ellos viven en Tatatila, pequeña población que se encuentra a 26 kilómetros de Xalapa, adonde viajan cada fin de semana a ofrecer sus productos. tatatila está ubicada en zona montañosa, a una altitud de 2.060 msnm, con un clima húmedo y temperaturas extremas. La lluvia promedio anual es de 1.346 mm, más abundante en verano y otoño.Los suelos de esta región son del tipo luvisol, que se caracterizan por tener acumulación de arcilla en el subsuelo, aunque con un buen potencial para actividades agrícolas, forestales y pecuarias, pero con fuertes pendientes y pedregosidad, lo que dificulta mucho las prácticas agrícolas con maquinaria y, a veces, también con los implementos agrícolas tradicionales.Estas características edafoclimáticas y orográficas son un reto para mantener los terrenos productivos sin que se degraden por la erosión. Las familias de Eduardo y Salomón han decidido responder a este reto a través de la diversificación biológica en tres pequeñas parcelas; en dos de una hectárea cultivan frutales, hortalizas y la milpa, y en la otra conservan bosque, de donde obtienen madera para construcción, leña y para producir carbón. Esta diversidad se hizo evidente durante las entrevistas realizadas a estos campesinos, pues reconocieron tener 35 especies diferentes entre frutales, hortalizas, forestales, medicinales, aromáticas y de condimentos, frijol y maíz, aunque es muy probable que haya muchas más especies útiles en este agroecosistema. Tal diversidad les permite contar con un suelo permanentemente cultivado y sin riesgos de erosión. Además el manejo de la pendiente, que en ambas parcelas es cercana al 40%, tiene una lógica interesante: en la parte más alta de la finca dejan un área pequeña de bosque, de tal manera que evite el escurrimiento del agua cuando llueve, y en las partes con mayor pendiente asocian árboles frutales (estrato arbóreo) con especies arbustivas, como puede ser el caso del chile de cera (Capsicum pubescens) o la berenjena (Cyphomandra betacea), con especies herbáceas como es el caso de la milpa, el chayote (Sechium edule) y los frijoles de enredadera que van ocupando todo el terreno sin dejar espacios vacíos.El manejo de la biodiversidad se vincula con la selección y conservación de semillas o materiales de propagación y a técnicas agronómicas como el injerto. Esto les permite incoporar germoplasma seleccionado a su unidad productiva.Así se van sumando criterios biológicos y culturales de gustos por la comida en un proceso que va afianzando una forma de vida, que se trasmite de generación en generación. Esta gran diversidad por lo tanto se expresa en el número de actividades y también en los períodos de cosecha que pueden prolongarse por muchos meses, garantizando así un ingreso, que si bien no es elevado, es casi permanente.Otra característica interesante encontrada es el deseo de mantener la unidad familiar como una manera de reproducir su forma de vida, que si bien es limitada en cuanto al nivel de ingresos, mantiene la filosofía del autosustento a partir del manejo de los recursos locales y el trabajo familiar. En este proceso los padres juegan un papel fundamental al trasmitir a sus hijos la forma de percibir la producción de alimentos y la cohesión familiar. Cada vez más las semillas son dominio de productores profesionales, agronegocios y elaboradores de políticas. Ellos deciden qué es una buena variedad y establecen leyes que excluyen a otras variedades. A pesar de esto, organizaciones de campesinos y movimientos sociales en Paraíba, Brasil, han logrado fortalecer las políticas públicas de semillas y los sistemas descentralizados para su selección y distribución, conducidas por los agricultores mediante sus organizaciones locales. De esta manera, están abriendo el camino para otro régimen de semillas.H istóricamente, los cultivos siempre se han adaptado a su medio ambiente natural y cultural. El resultado es un rico patrimonio biocultural, la agrobiodiversidad. Este proceso se interrumpió cuando la maximización de los rendimientos se volvió el principal hilo conductor del mejoramiento de cultivos. Según el punto de vista dominante, se necesitan tecnologías agroindustriales modernas para crear y mantener las condiciones ambientales necesarias para que un cultivo realice completamente su potencial genético.El gobierno federal de Brasil y el del estado de Paraíba han lanzado varios programas que respondían a este punto de vista agronómico, la promoción de variedades que responden bien a la aplicación intensiva de agroquímicos. Se animó a los agricultores familiares a reemplazar su amplia gama de variedades locales de, por ejemplo, frijoles, maíz, yuca y maní, con unas cuantas \"variedades mejoradas\". A medida que estas variedades se extendieron, la biodiversidad agrícola disminuyó.Este enfoque o paradigma agrícola, se institucionalizó aún más cuando nuevas regulaciones definieron qué es una \"semilla\". De acuerdo con la Ley de Semillas de Brasil -alineada con los acuerdos internacionales sobre el tema-las variedades solo pueden comercializarse si son reconocidas por los institutos de investigación y las comisiones agrarias del Ministerio de Agricultura, que están fuertemente influenciados por los intereses económicos de las empresas de producción de semillas. La Ley de Cultivares del país establece los requisitos de estabilidad, uniformidad y homogeneidad de las semillas para que puedan ser registradas como variedades protegidas.Adriana Galvão Freire 14 | LEISA revista de agroecología | 30-1 biodiversidad/gestión de la semilla Hay varios problemas con este desarrollo. Las variedades locales tienen una alta variabilidad genética, que es exactamente lo que las hace tan resistentes al estrés ambiental. Pero estas variedades ya no son consideradas \"semillas\" sino \"granos\". Además los agricultores tienen que utilizar variedades protegidas para poder beneficiarse de diversos programas de apoyo, lo cual desincentiva el uso de variedades autóctonas.La dicotomía semillas-granos se ha convertido en una arena de lucha para los movimientos en defensa de la agroecología en Brasil. La producción agroecológica se fundamenta en el uso sostenible del capital ecológico de las diferentes regiones y el uso de las variedades adaptadas localmente juega un papel clave en esta estrategia. Además, contrariamente a las políticas de semillas del Estado, la agroecología apoya la creación de una agricultura cada vez más autónoma, libre del funcionamiento de los mercados de insumos y del poder corporativo del sector del agronegocio. La Articulación del Semiárido de Paraíba (ASA-PB), una coalición de organizaciones de la sociedad civil, ha desafiado esta dicotomía con la movilización de agricultores alrededor de las \"semillas de pasión\": variedades locales que, a diferencia de las semillas distribuidas por los programas públicos, están enraizadas cultural y ambientalmente.Las prácticas que usan y conservan la biodiversidad agrícola en la región semiárida de Brasil son una estrategia de reproducción económica importante para los agricultores familiares. Aunque estas prácticas se llevan a cabo en todas partes, siguen siendo en gran medida invisibles, consideradas \"irrelevantes\" por las fuerzas ideológicas y económicas dominantes. Por esta razón la identificación y mejoramiento de la visibilidad de estas prácticas fue un primer paso crucial.ASA-PB comenzó este proceso en 1996. En colaboración con el sindicato de agricultores locales se realizó una evaluación participativa, para identificar las variedades locales de frijol en los municipios de Solânea y Remígio. Se encontraron 67 variedades de frijoles con características diferentes, incluyendo resistencia a sequías y plagas, sabor y aceptación en el mercado. También se identificaron mecanismos, impulsados por los agricultores, que mejoran la diversidad y la seguridad de las semillas. Por ejemplo, los agricultores guardan sus semillas y las intercambian con otras familias, lo que permite la libre circulación del material genético y de los conocimientos asociados a cada variedad en las comunidades. Otro ejemplo, en la década de 1970 las comunidades eclesiales de base, ligadas a la Iglesia Católica, apoyaron el establecimiento de bancos de semillas comunitarios en la región semiárida brasileña. Estos bancos resultaron muy eficaces en tiempos de sequía, cuando se perdieron las cosechas y las reservas de semillas propias de los agricultores se agotan. El banco presta semillas a los agricultores, quienes las devuelven, con un pequeño porcentaje de incremento, después de la cosecha. Para las organizaciones dentro de ASA-PB, la comprensión de estas prácticas fue esencial para hacerlas más visibles y extender su aplicación.Los bancos de semillas locales formaron un importante punto de partida para un nuevo sistema de seguridad de las semillas. ASA-PB estableció la Red Semillas, una plataforma de intercambio de conocimientos sobre las prácticas de siembra y conservación de la agrobiodiversidad. Esta red conecta 230 bancos de semillas en 61 municipios, que abarcan 6.500 familias campesinas en Paraíba. Durante una de las reuniones de la red, un agricultor acuñó el término \"semillas de pasión\". Basado en este concepto localmente construido y luego difundido, Joaquim Santana, representante del sindicato de agricultores del municipio de Montadas dijo: \"las 'semillas de pasión' son aquellas que son buenas, que se adaptan a nuestra realidad\", afirmando luego: \"La gente solamente se apasiona con lo que le es significativo\".La Red Semillas formó un espacio para el análisis político crítico y la promoción de alternativas. En 1993 una sequía provocó una protesta en la que ASA-PB y otros movimientos sociales desafiaron las medidas estatales, que se basaban en la idea de \"combate a la sequía\". En cambio ASA-PB y otros propusieron \"convivir con el semiárido\", un pensamiento eminentemente agroecológico.Como respuesta, el gobierno nacional puso en marcha una política de apoyo a los bancos comunitarios por medio de donaciones de semillas. Estas donaciones dieron un impulso a las comunidades para la construcción de nuevos bancos de semillas, pero los stocks de los bancos fueron repuestos con semillas convencionales. Después de la sequía de 1998 a 1999, los bancos locales de semillas fueron reabastecidos de nuevo con semillas convencionales, medida que fue recibida con protestas. ASA-PB persuadió al gobierno de Paraíba de adquirir semillas de agricultores locales para el año siguiente. La iniciativa tropezó con una barrera legislativa: las semillas locales no estaban reconocidas como semillas y por lo tanto no podían ser distribuidas oficialmente por el estado a través de la red de bancos de semillas. El gobierno pasó por alto esta barrera adquiriendo las semillas como \"granos\" y transfiriéndolas a ASA-PB que luego las distribuyó, a través de sus mediadores, a los bancos de semillas. En 2002 una ley en Paraíba hizo posibles las transferencias directas. Cuando las variedades locales fueron formalmente reconocidas por el gobierno nacional en 2003, en gran parte como resultado de la presión ejercida por la Articulación Nacional de Agroecología, la puerta se abrió para innovaciones más progresistas en el programa gubernamental de semillas.Una de las estrategias del gobierno de Lula da Silva para eliminar el hambre fue el Programa de Adquisición de Alimentos. Como parte de este programa, en 2003 el gobierno y las organizaciones conectadas a ASA-PB ayudaron a los agricultores a producir y distribuir variedades autóctonas que estuvieran libres de contaminación transgénica. Las semillas fueron compradas y distribuidas directamente a los agricultores.Esta experiencia confirma que las organizaciones locales pueden y deben desempeñar un papel de liderazgo en el mantenimiento del patrimonio biocultural encarnado en las variedades locales. El Estado puede apoyar el fortalecimiento de la acción colectiva orientada a la redistribución y la regulación de las reservas de semilla de las variedades locales. A pesar de los éxitos alcanzados por el programa en Paraíba y algunos otros estados, la mayoría de los programas gubernamentales de semillas continúa estando sesgada hacia el paradigma convencional, con el argumento de que ha sido científicamente demostrado que las Diálogo sobre los resultados de la investigación conducida con tableiros Costeiros de EMBRAPA Adriana Galvão Freire LEISA revista de agroecología | 30-1 | 15 biodiversidad/gestión de la semilla semillas mejoradas funcionan en condiciones semiáridas y que iniciativas como las de ASA-PB, aunque deseables, no se pueden llevar a una escala que permita llegar a todos los agricultores que necesitan semillas. Esto ha llevado ASA-PB a reconocer la necesidad de involucrarse con la ciencia.Para demostrar que las variedades locales son superiores a las variedades distribuidas por los programas oficiales la Red de Semillas de ASA-PB entró en una alianza con EMBRAPA, la agencia de investigación agrícola más influyente del gobierno federal. Esto ayudó a la Red a ganar tanto aceptación en el mundo académico como legitimidad ante los funcionarios involucrados en los programas de semillas. Las organizaciones que integran la Red Semillas participaron en la investigación que siguió, la cual consistió en comparar el rendimiento de las variedades locales y convencionales.El equipo de investigación utilizó métodos participativos para determinar qué variedades comparar, qué lugares utilizar para la prueba y cómo debería estructurarse la interacción entre los agricultores y los investigadores, de modo que los parámetros de rendimiento se identificasen conjuntamente. Estos parámetros incluyeron la calidad del grano, la sanidad vegetal, la cantidad de biomasa que una planta produce y el efecto de la asociación de cultivos.Los resultados de los estudios mostraron que las variedades locales superaron a las variedades convencionales en todas las regiones y en cada uno de los tres años que duró el experimento. Las variedades convencionales sólo rindieron mejor en suelos muy fértiles y con mucha lluvia, que son condiciones excepcionales para la agricultura familiar en las regiones semiáridas. Se concluyó que las variedades con mejor rendimiento en un área determinada por lo general son originarias de dicha área. También se encontró que las variedades locales producen más biomasa, que es muy valorada como alimento para animales, especialmente en el clima errático de la región. Por último, la investigación mostró que las instalaciones para almacenamiento de semillas construidas por los agricultores, a menudo utilizando sólo materiales de la zona y sin pesticidas, tuvieron un buen desempeño.Aunque la investigación confirmó lo que los agricultores ya sabían, las prácticas locales ahora han sido reconocidas científicamente. Más aún, se aprendió mucho de la interacción entre agricultores e investigadores, tanto en cuanto a contenido como metodológicamente. Esto contribuyó en gran medida a la lucha para aumentar la visibilidad de las \"semillas de pasión\".Hasta ahora la experiencia en Paraíba demuestra la importancia de la movilización social para mejorar la capacidad de acción colectiva en las comunidades rurales. También muestra que el Estado puede jugar un papel importante en el apoyo a las organizaciones y redes de la sociedad civil en la construcción de sistemas de seguridad de semillas. Estos sistemas permiten a los agricultores familiares en las regiones semiáridas construir sus propias estrategias de alimentación y nutrición y aumentar su resiliencia al cambio climático. La lucha puede abrir el camino a otro régimen de semillas, uno que se base en la realidad de los agricultores familiares.Cordinador ejecutivo de AS-PTA -paulo@aspta.org.brAsesor técnico de AS-PTA -Luciano@aspta.org.brAsesor técnico de AS-PTA -emanoel@aspta.org.brInvestigador de Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros amaury.santos@embrapa.brInvestigador de Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros fernando.curado@embrapa.br Semillas de pasión: obteniendo legitimación científica y reconocimiento histórico AS-PTA 16 | LEISA revista de agroecología | 30-1 biodiversidad/gestión de la semilla El rol de las semillas campesinas en la sierra del Ecuador E s evidente el rol que los pequeños productores desempeñan en la conservación y desarrollo de la biodiversidad agrícola, y los impactos de este recurso en la seguridad y soberanía alimentaria. La velocidad con la cual los recursos genéticos locales han desaparecido ha dejado claro que si los esfuerzos comunitarios para la conservación in situ no son reconocidos, los recursos genéticos se perderán.El Manejo Comunitario de la Biodiversidad ha devenido en una estrategia para el manejo de los recursos genéticos en la finca. Como tal, integra conocimientos y prácticas dentro de un sistema social con el fin de construir la capacidad de las comunidades rurales para tomar decisiones sobre la conservación y uso de la biodiversidad y asegurar el acceso y control sobre sus recursos ( Los agricultores familiares campesinos de las provincias ecuatorianas de Bolívar, Chimborazo y Cotopaxi, están logrando un mayor acceso y control de sus recursos biológicos, lo que aumenta su capacidad de resiliencia y soberanía alimentaria.Campesinas exponen variedades locales de papas logradas con sus semillas principal para asegurar la resiliencia de los sistemas productivos, frente a las perturbaciones creadas por el cambio climático y las crisis recurrentes de mercados.La importancia de la pequeña agricultura familiar para el país está en su aporte a la alimentación. Más del 50% de los productos primarios en la dieta del ecuatoriano son provistos por este sector agrícola, que en el caso de otros productos básicos como papas, cebollas y maíz, su aporte es de 70% o más (Chiriboga, 2006(Chiriboga, , 2012)). La base biológica de la producción de la pequeña agricultura está en las semillas del campesino, en cuyas manos ha recaído históricamente su uso, conservación y saberes concomitantes. El sistema campesino es el mayor oferente de semillas de cultivos andinos, tanto de variedades mejoradas como locales, que en su mayoría son cultivadas en pequeñas fincas. En la práctica el sistema campesino de semillas en el Ecuador constituye, sin duda, una de las formas más conspicuas de autoorganización social, abarcando una red extensa de actores, influencias, tradiciones e instituciones que ha resistido a las influencias de todo tipo de actores externos y políticas agrícolas, con una vitalidad aún vigorosa.El abandono y falta de comprensión de la importancia de fortalecer los sistemas campesinos de manejo de recursos genéticos por los sectores modernizantes, y el proceso privatizador del Estado -iniciado en la década de 1980 sobre las bases de la Revolución Verde-debilitaron la institucionalidad oficial y minimizaron el rol del Estado en la mejora del conocimiento y organización de estos sistemas.Actualmente, las semillas formales y \"mejoradas\" no constituyen, ni han constituido, más del 1 al 2% del material de siembra en el país (cuadro 1). Preocupados por los impactos ambientales, generados por la agricultura agroindustrial y la necesidad de alternativas agrícolas para hacer frente al cambio climático, las miradas de políticos, técnicos y académicos se vuelve hacia la pequeña agricultura.A pesar del reconocimiento actual de la biodiversidad local como factor clave para mantener estos sistemas agrícolas activos y resilientes, nuestros estudios presentan evidencias de que los sistemas agrícolas de los pequeños agricultores de la Sierra Central están, en términos biológicos y organizativos, en grave riesgo. En opinión de cientos de campesinos que hemos entrevistado en comunidades de la Sierra Central sobre las causas de pérdidas de variedades y semillas, están la promoción del monocultivo, las demandas de mercados modelada por ciertos estereotipos de calidad, la migración que afecta al conocimiento local y en general, el desconocimiento del consumo de ciertos productos nativos. A esto se agrega el que una mayor variabilidad climática y frecuencia de eventos extremos resultará, probablemente, en sistemas de semillas disfuncionales y agricultores y comunidades sin control sobre sus recursos.Las variables en el cuadro 2 ilustran la pérdida sistemática de control sobre los recursos biológicos, las chacras al perder su resiliencia ponen en riesgo el futuro de la agricultura y las estrategias de vida de los campesinos. Sin embargo, este cuadro también muestra que los comuneros se autoidentifican como líderes en el manejo de plantas y semillas. Estos comuneros tienen un gran valor en la transmisión de conocimientos y potenciamiento de innovaciones sociales y técnicas.Durante los últimos años nuestra organización ha estado trabajando con familias campesinas e indígenas en la Sierra Central, en lo que ellas describen como la pérdida acelerada de su cultura como resultado de los diferentes procesos de modernización: cultura externa, producción industrial, migración, etc.Iniciamos un proceso de acción-aprendizaje con el objetivo de hacer visible el rol y función de las semillas y sus depositarios para las comunidades, así como su importancia para las estrategias de vida de las familias. El proceso se enfocó en resaltar 18 | LEISA revista de agroecología | 30-1 biodiversidad/gestión de la semilla la agrobiodiversidad como una fortaleza de las comunidades y reconocer la necesidad de mejorarla.Una primera etapa involucró la documentación campesina de los recursos disponibles en finca y en la comunidad, las prácticas y el conocimiento local. Trabajamos en experimentación campesina, días de campo, giras e intercambios campesino a campesino, etc., para llenar vacíos de conocimientos referentes a la botánica de las plantas cultivadas, disponibilidad de semillas, erosión genética, etc. Para fortalecer las redes locales y promover vínculos en ámbitos de mayor complejidad, identificamos a los actores locales que intervienen en los sistemas de acceso e intercambio de semillas. Paralelamente, iniciamos un proceso de incorporación de variedades mejoradas y reintroducción de numerosos materiales desde los bancos de germoplasma, particularmente de papas locales.Iniciamos la construcción de una propuesta de bancos comunitarios y hemos comenzado el análisis de qué factores les confieren fortalezas o debilidades, y también de sus potencialidades de cobertura territorial y política. Después de un proceso intenso de organización, varios bancos están operando y han mostrado capacidad para dinamizar el intercambio de materiales genéticos.Como mecanismo de capitalización, toda semilla aportada al banco con fines de producción es devuelta por los comuneros en la modalidad de \"2 x 1\", mientras que el mecanismo de \"pase en cadena\" forma la base de la difusión de materiales con arreglo a la equidad. La idea detrás de estos acuerdos es crear mecanismos de redistribución, mantener la semilla de la especie en cuestión y generar un producto para la venta cuyo retorno permitirá formar un fondo de apoyo multipropósito.Las comunidades han tenido éxito en relacionarse para la circulación e intercambio de materiales y conocimientos, lo que ha fortalecido sus capacidades para mejorar la biodiversidad local y lograr fuertes lazos entre las familias. En particular, las mujeres ganaron mayor aprecio dentro de sus comunidades debido a sus habilidades para conservar y mejorar variedades y semillas.Los consumidores urbanos y sus organizaciones han probado vincularse con los grupos de productores rurales para mejorar la agroecología y el acceso a alimentos sanos. Como resultado, el proceso presentado ha permitido contrarrestar la pérdida de biodiversidad y que tanto consumidores como productores recuperen su identidad y orgullo por sus saberes e interés por la innovación.En conclusión, el fortalecimiento de los sistemas agrícolas andinos deberá estar construido con la convicción de que cualquier acción en este campo debería empezar con las experiencias, elecciones y prioridades de la gente rural y debería fortalecer la capacidad de las comunidades para el manejo autónomo de sus sistemas de semillas y para responder a los desafíos modernos de la seguridad alimentaria. Esto implica nuevos arreglos organizativos e institucionales.Los autores reconocen el valioso aporte realizado por varones y mujeres líderes de las organizaciones campesinas. Su pasión y compromiso son un futuro esperanzador. Agradecemos el apoyo de la Fundación McKnight, Embajada de Holanda, Fundación Tidlund, Fundación Swift y FAO para hacer posible la realización de esta experiencia. WiLFREDO ROJAS, MiLtON PiNtO, JuANA FLORES, StEFANO PADuLOSiEl cambio y la variabilidad climática representan una grave amenaza para la agrobiodiversidad.Ante esta situación la comunidad internacional está respondiendo con un mayor apoyo a la conservación ex situ. Sin embargo, este apoyo está orientado hacia los cultivos considerados \"principales\", como el trigo, maíz, arroz y papa, y no toma en cuenta a los otros cultivos subutilizados y estratégicos para la seguridad alimentaria y nutricional de la humanidad. En comparación con la conservación ex situ, la conservación en finca (in situ) es poco abordada por los programas de investigación y desarrollo, y débilmente integrada en las estrategias nacionales de conservación.Agricultores Custodios realizan la selección de semilla de oca después de la cosecha.Comunidad Cachilaya, provincia Los Andes, La Paz -BoliviaFundación PROINPA L a conservación en finca se desarrolla mediante estrategias basadas en las comunidades campesinas y, a diferencia de la conservación ex situ, mantiene los conocimientos tradicionales vinculados a la agrobiodiversidad y a las prácticas relacionadas con su uso, transmitidos por los agricultores de generación en generación. Los agricultores que se distinguen de los demás por su contribución a la conservación de la diversidad de cultivos y variedades en sus sistemas tradicionales de manejo son los pilares de la conservación de la agrobiodiversidad. Es necesario hacer un mayor esfuerzo para reconocer la contribución de estos agricultores que, silenciosamente y sin reconocimiento alguno, aportan con los cultivos destinados principalmente a la alimentación de sus familias.El proyecto Especies Olvidadas y Subutilizadas del Fondo Internacional para el Desarrollo Agrícola -conocido como NUS IFAD III por sus siglas en inglés-es coordinado por Bioversity International y se ejecuta en tres países: India, Nepal y Bolivia. Este proyecto contribuye a desarrollar métodos, herramientas y enfoques para evaluar y monitorear la agrobiodiversidad, así como su adaptación al cambio climático.Algunos agricultores destacan en sus comunidades por su dedicación al manejo de una amplia diversidad de cultivos y variedades, incluyendo las variedades raras y en peligro de extinción. Estos agricultores poseen el conocimiento tradicional asociado al manejo de la agrobiodiversidad. A estos agricultores excepcionales se les han otorgado diversos nombres, como: expertos de semillas, agricultores nodales, conservadores de semillas, curiosos, conservacionistas, innovadores, guardianes de las semillas y agricultores custodios. 20 | LEISA revista de agroecología | 30-1 biodiversidad/gestión de la semilla En Bolivia el proyecto NUS IFAD III, desde octubre de 2011, trabaja con cuatro instituciones socias: CARE Bolivia, Samaritan's Purse, CETHA Tupak Katari y la Fundación PROINPA. Las actividades se ejecutan en ocho comunidades del área circundante al lago Titicaca y con 43 \"agricultores custodios\" que fueron seleccionados mediante un enfoque participativo (Cuadro 1). En forma conjunta, los agricultores de la comunidad y los técnicos facilitadores definieron los criterios para la selección de los agricultores custodios: 1) tener un número importante de especies y variedades; 2) mantener una vocación para conservar y usar la diversidad de variedades; 3) amplia experiencia en el manejo de cultivos, y 4) ser reconocidos y respetados por la comunidad en su papel de agricultor. Los agricultores custodios fueron seleccionados, reconocidos y validados por la comunidad por su contribución a la conservación de la diversidad de cultivos.Durante dos años agrícolas (2011-2013) se ha realizado el registro de la agrobiodiversidad con este grupo de agricultores custodios. Por cada agricultor custodio se cuenta con un libro del Registro Comunitario de la Biodiversidad, que consiste en 20 variables y las respectivas imágenes fotográficas.Los agricultores custodios no solo conservan su diversidad de cultivos sino que experimentan, son observadores por excelencia y tienen un sentido de responsabilidad para compartir su material vegetal, conocimiento, patrimonio y cultura con sus familias, comunidades y con la sociedad en general; ellos son quienes mantienen, adaptan y fomentan la biodiversidad agrícola. Los otros agricultores de la comunidad tienen la responsabilidad de seleccionar y conservar las semillas para asegurar la subsistencia de sus familias.Se encuentra en proceso la conformación de una Red de Agricultores Custodios, igual a las que existen en otras partes del mundo como México y Nepal y donde este tipo de organizaciones son reconocidas y apoyadas por sus gobiernos en el marco de una política nacional. Estas redes juegan un rol importante en la conservación y uso de agrobiodiversidad y, aquí en Bolivia, se espera que las políticas de gobierno les brinden apoyo por su papel estratégico como guardianes de la diversidad genética y del conocimiento tradicional asociado.Es importante tener en cuenta la naturaleza de cada comunidad con el fin de determinar si se debe promover la acción colectiva en lugar de trabajar, además, con agricultores individuales. Por lo general, la participación de todos los agricultores de la comunidad es necesaria, de lo contrario el trabajo de los agricultores custodios será limitado en el sentido de que las personas ya no quieren compartir sus semillas o material de siembra con ellos, creando barreras en los flujos de semillas. En este sentido, los bancos comunitarios de semillas son vistos como una estrategia complementaria para apoyar a los agricultores custodios, como es el caso del sur de Asia donde su concepción y manejo están mucho más avanzados.Los bancos comunitarios de semilla cumplen, al mismo tiempo, la función de ser espacios de multiplicación de semillas y de enseñanza-aprendizaje entre los agricultores, donde se ponen en práctica de manera colectiva los aprendizajes compartidos en los cursos de capacitación. Sin embargo, se necesita más investigación para entender mejor la complementación de funciones entre los esfuerzos individuales (agricultores custodios) con los esfuerzos colectivos (bancos comunitarios de semillas) para el mantenimiento, valorización e intercambio de la diversidad genética y del conocimiento tradicional. También falta generar y poner en evidencia las funciones y la relación entre los bancos comunitarios de semillas y los bancos nacionales de germoplasma.El Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agropecuaria y Forestal (INIAF), creado en junio de 2008, es la institución nacional encargada de la investigación agrícola, pecuaria y forestal del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia y actualmente está a cargo de los Bancos Nacionales de Germoplasma. Entre sus actividades principales está la conformación del Sistema Nacional de Re-Viviana, René, Ricardo y Elías, agricultores custodios de la comunidad de Cachilaya, provincia Los Andes, La Paz De los cinco municipios en los que se trabaja, el Municipio de Batallas ha dado un paso importante al priorizar e incorporar en su Plan de Desarrollo el apoyo a la conservación de la agrobiodiversidad, por la función que cumple en la adaptación al cambio climático. Asimismo, el rol de las instituciones involucradas como PROINPA, CARE Bolivia, CETHA Túpac Katari, Samaritan's Purse, además de otros actores que trabajan en el desarrollo y entendimiento de la dinámica local de estos procesos, es fundamental para su articulación en el SNRG. De esta forma es posible construir de manera participativa un modelo de manejo, conservación y uso de los recursos genéticos que vele por este patrimonio que tiene el país.Fundación PROINPA, La Paz, Bolivia w.rojas@proinpa.orgFundación PROINPA, La Paz, BoliviaFundación PROINPA, La Paz, Bolivia Banco Comunitario de Semillas de papa nativa en la comunidad Coromata Media, provincia Omasuyos, La Paz, Bolivia.Agricultores custodios explican y evalúan las diferencias entre variedades Sin embargo, a partir de la Revolución Verde a mediados del siglo pasado, empezó a popularizarse el uso de agroquímicos que incrementan la productividad del cultivo a corto plazo, pero a la larga agotan la fertilidad del suelo, crean plagas resistentes y son contaminantes y nocivos para la salud de los agricultores. Además, en los últimos diez años el precio de los agroquímicos se ha triplicado.Buscando una alternativa para preservar el suelo, un grupo de agricultores adoptó prácticas agroecológicas en el cultivo de su maíz, con lo que además reducían costos y certificaban su producto como orgánico.Históricamente una forma de dar valor agregado a este maíz, que de otro modo no tiene mercado, es la venta de tortillas artesanales. La tortilla tradicional elaborada con la metodología prehispánica, involucra el uso de maíz previamente nixtamalizado (cocido en agua de cal y molido) y su cocción en estufas de leña. En la zona Pátzcuaro-Zirahuén hay aproximadamente 200 talleres de tortilleras que manufacturan tortillas de En Pátzcuaro-Zirahuén, Michoacán, los agricultores familiares luchan por la defensa de sus variedades nativas de maíz. La experiencia de la red Tsiri es una muestra de acción para la conservación desde la semilla, el cultivo, y el procesamiento del grano y elaboración de las clásicas tortillas. El cambio en el patrón alimentario mexicano ha hecho que se dejen de consumir productos artesanales y locales, poniendo en riesgo de perderse para siempre la enorme riqueza gastronómica, cultural y agronómica que representan las variedades locales de maíz, junto con el estilo de vida campesino que las sustenta. En los últimos años, como respuesta a esta alarmante situación, movimientos como \"Sin Maíz No Hay País\" o la agroecología han despertado el interés de algunos sectores de la población por el consumo responsable y los productos locales y orgánicos.Con estos antecedentes, en 2009 se formó la Red Tsiri (maíz en lengua purhépecha), fruto de la colaboración de investigadores y técnicos del Grupo Interdisciplinario de Tecnología Rural Apropiada (GIRA) y el Centro de Investigaciones en Geografía Ambiental de la UNAM (CIGA), con el objetivo de crear un vínculo sin intermediarios entre los productores de maíz orgánico local, talleres de tortilleras y consumidores conscientes.Un taller tradicional de tortilleras da empleo a dos mujeres en promedio. La construcción habitual es de piso de tierra, paredes de madera, techo de lámina de acero galvanizado y una estufa en forma de \"U\". Estas estufas expulsan todo el humo dentro de la cocina, creando graves problemas de salud a largo plazo, además de ser sumamente ineficientes en el consumo de leña. Como parte de su empeño por dignificar las condiciones de trabajo de las tortilleras, la Red Tsiri ha promovido la transformación de los talleres con la instalación de pisos firmes de cemento, techos de ladrillo y estufas ahorradoras Patsari. Las estufas Patsari desarrolladas por GIRA con la colaboración de académicos y usuarias son un modelo mejorado de las estufas Lorena (la Lorena -lodo y arena-es una popular estufa ahorradora diseñada en Guatemala en la década de 1970), ahorran hasta en un 60% el consumo de leña con respecto a las estufas o fogones tradicionales y cuentan con una chimenea que expulsa el humo fuera de las cocinas.La Red Tsiri busca preservar la agricultura sostenible campesina y ayudar a valorizar los maíces criollos a través de productos artesanales; busca ser \"sustentable de la tierra a la mesa\". En la actualidad cuenta ya con cinco tortilleras de tiempo completo y otras cinco como apoyo cuando aumenta la demanda, las cuales compran maíz orgánico producido en la región a un precio justo. Gracias a la creatividad de las señoras, además de tortillas y gorditas, la Red Tsiri ofrece ahora también otros productos como galletas de maíz, ponteduros y taller de tortilleras antes (izquierda) y después (derecha) Marta Astier atole de pinole. Tiene presencia en mercados alternativos de la ciudad de Morelia, en el campus Morelia de la UNAM y en muchos hogares de consumidores sensibilizados.En conclusión, la Red Tsiri es una experiencia que sigue creciendo gracias al amor de su gente por la tierra y por el maíz, y que busca llegar cada vez más lejos, llevando productos artesanales y orgánicos a un número cada vez mayor de consumidores, porque creemos que son iniciativas como estas las que pueden devolverle el sentido a un sistema de consumo globalizado y mecanizado que ha perdido su vínculo con la tierra y con el hombre.Omar Xabier Masera Astier omarnnmap@gmail.com Marta Astier Agricultura Ecológica. Centro de Investigaciones en Geografía Ambiental, UNAM mastier@ciga.unam.mx 24 | LEISA revista de agroecología | 30-1 biodiversidad/gestión de la semillaJAViER CARRERA En estos tiempos de uniformizadas semillas de almacén tendemos a olvidar que la semilla evoluciona, que su lenta transformación de mano en mano, generación tras generación, ha sido el aspecto más esencial del cultivo desde los inicios de la agricultura. Queremos en este artículo analizar algunos aspectos de esta evolución, en base a un ejemplo concreto. El ejemplo elegido es el de un proyecto llevado a cabo por la Red de Guardianes de Semillas de Ecuador en el cantón Calceta de la Provincia de Manabí, donde se intentó adaptar una técnica ancestral de cultivo de arroz con variedades propias del país. El proyecto fue implementado por Servio Pachard, guardián de semillas local y técnico agroecólogo, junto con sus compañeros de la Asociación de Productores Agroecológicos San Francisco de Sarampión, en base al diseño de Servio y de quien escribe este artículo.Quedaba la duda de si se podría adaptar esta forma de cultivo a las especies de patos y peces del Ecuador. Nuestra red decidió implementar un proyecto experimental que consistió en la siembra de arroz criollo variedad Lira, con patos nativos (Cairina moschata, bastante más grandes que los asiáticos), el helecho azolla y chame (Dormitator latifrons), un pez de poza muy apreciado en la culinaria local. Para dar más validez al experimento se sembró una parcela testigo con cultivo convencional químico.El principal efecto que causan los patos es el de enturbiar el agua, por lo que su nivel debe controlarse de manera que los pies de los patos rocen el fondo de la poza, sin llegar a asentarse. Esto crea condiciones muy similares a la de los pantanos donde evolucionó el arroz, y al ser el agua muy oscura, reduce al mínimo la germinación de malezas. El suelo así aflojado pone a disposición del arroz una cantidad mayor de nutrientes. Adicionalmente, los patos depositan grandes cantidades de estiércol Los patos saliendo de su casa en el borde del arrozal Red Guardianes de Semillas arroz con pato L a Asociación San Francisco de Sarampión está recorriendo un arduo pero emocionante camino hacia el cultivo agroecológico. En 2010, la asociación instaló su propia piladora de arroz de rodillos regulables para poder vender arroz integral de semilla criolla. Para 2011 la producción ya había logrado eliminar los pesticidas y herbicidas, pasando al deshierbe manual y el control de plagas con preparados de plantas medicinales. Pero se mantenía el uso de urea, pues los socios encontraban imposible producir sin este fertilizante sintético.Y es en este momento que nos preguntamos, ¿cómo produjeron arroz los campesinos asiáticos, por miles de años, sin necesidad de fertilizantes artificiales? La investigación bibliográfica reveló varios métodos, pero el que más llamó la atención fue el modelo ancestral que incorporaba el pequeño pato chino y la lamprea (Hyperoartia, una clase de agnatos o peces sin mandíbulas con forma de anguila no muy grande). Este modelo está siendo rescatado y promovido por el permacultor japonés Takao Furuno.LEISA revista de agroecología | 30-1 | 25 biodiversidad/gestión de la semilla rico en nitrógeno, fósforo y potasio. Otro aspecto importante es que el chapoteo de los patos oxigena el agua, al tiempo que disemina el estiércol.Los patos se alimentan de las malezas y de los insectos, así como de larvas, lombrices, algas y otros seres vivos que se reproducen en gran cantidad en la poza ecológica. Es decir, cumplen la doble función de controladores de plagas y de malezas. La siembra de la azolla contribuyó a su desarrollo, así como los alevines de chame. Además, los patos necesitaron poco alimento adicional: un suplemento alimenticio al 18% durante 30 días y, a partir de entonces, un poco de maíz y restos de cocina. Esto puede mejorar a futuro, cuando se diversifique y mejore la fauna y flora de la poza, y se siembren policultivos al borde de la misma.Los resultados que Servio presentó a la asamblea anual de la Red de Guardianes de Semillas, reunida en julio de 2012, causaron alegría y asombro: la parcela de los patos logró una cosecha récord para variedades criollas y superó ligeramente en productividad al testigo convencional. No se usó ningún tipo de fertilizante. En pleno ataque de caracol manzano, que destruyó el 30% de los arrozales en el país, esta parcela no recibió ningún tipo de control de plagas y no sufrió en absoluto por ello, pues los patos y peces protegieron perfectamente el cultivo. El deshierbe manual se redujo a una fracción. Y las ganancias económicas triplicaron lo obtenido por la parcela testigo, pues al arroz orgánico se sumó la venta de patos y peces. Además, se obtuvo una dieta casi completa en lugar de un monocultivo.Un aspecto muy interesante fue que, de acuerdo a la bibliografía consultada, Furuno recomienda sacar a los patos del sistema cuando el arroz forma su semilla para evitar que se la coman. Pero Furuno utiliza semillas híbridas modernas, que producen plantas de tallos cortos, fácilmente accesibles para los patos. La variedad criolla Lira utilizada en el experimento de Calceta es de tallo largo y resultó imposible para los patos alcanzar la semilla, por lo que se los pudo mantener en la poza hasta la cosecha del arroz. Esto facilita el manejo del sistema y extiende el beneficio de los patos.El sistema \"arroz + patos + peces\" se convierte básicamente en un ecosistema completo, donde los insectos y hierbas cumplen el papel de alimentar a los animales en lugar de convertirse en plagas y malezas; donde se produce carbohidrato y proteínas en grandes cantidades con poco esfuerzo, y de forma sostenible, pues la fertilidad de la poza aumentará con los años. Este fue sin duda uno de los sistemas de cultivo más populares en Asia hasta la llegada de la Revolución Verde. Y nos parece lógico suponer que una de las razones por las que los antiguos agricultores asiáticos no trataron de crear variedades de arroz de tallo corto, fue precisamente la necesidad de mantener a los patos en el sistema. Este tipo de producción no puede realizarse con plantas de tallo corto, excesiva uniformidad genética o acostumbradas a alimentarse solo con nutrientes sintéticos. Un ejemplo claro de por qué la agroecología requiere semillas campesinas, pues son estas las que evolucionaron en sistemas de tipo agroecológico.La semilla evolucionó a lo largo de la historia de la agricultura en este contexto:• Agricultura de tipo familiar en unidades productivas controladas por familias que dependían directamente de la calidad de su semilla para su supervivencia. • Agricultura de tipo sostenible, sin insumos externos, adaptada a las condiciones locales: climáticas, de suelo, ecológicas. • Sistemas de cultivo que producen dietas completas, es decir, policultivos que incluyen animales en el sistema. • Selección realizada a nivel familiar, a lo largo de generaciones, donde cada persona que realiza el proceso de selección Servio Pachard, coautor y director del estudio del arroz con patos, procesando carbón de cascarilla de arroz para usarlo como fijador de abonos en la huertaRed Guardianes de Semillas va imprimiendo su propia huella, de acuerdo a sus gustos y necesidades. La semilla no es un ente pasivo en esta relación, al contrario: lo que se da es una especie de diálogo simbiótico entre las familias de agricultores y sus semillas. • Intercambio y circulación libre de las semillas entre las familias productoras. Las semillas viajan de mano en mano entre las familias y a través de circuitos tradicionales de comercio.Estos son los aspectos fundamentales que permitieron la creación del enorme patrimonio genético que heredó la humanidad. La creación de las variedades de cultivo no fue labor de entidades estatales o grandes empresas privadas hasta el advenimiento de la agricultura industrial y la Revolución Verde.Es hora de cambiar ese paradigma. La destrucción de los suelos, el cambio climático, la declinación en el abastecimiento de los combustibles fósiles nos obligan a orientarnos hacia modelos sostenibles de producción. La agricultura familiar de tipo agroecológico, de bajo costo y alta producción de alimentos, representa la mejor opción para nuestro futuro. Pero ese futuro solo será posible si las familias de productores recuperan su evolución simbiótica con las semillas.Red de Guardianes de Semillas, Ecuador info@redsemillas.org -www.redsemillas.orgMARiANA MARASAS, VALENtiNA FERNáNDEZ, NADiA DuBROVSky BERENSZtEiNLa generación de soluciones para los problemas sociales y medioambientales que enfrentan los agricultores familiares del Cinturón Hortícola de La Plata, requiere romper con la interpretación reduccionista del agroecosistema y la práctica de transferencia de tecnologías. Un primer intento es a partir del trabajo colectivo entre agricultores, técnicos e investigadores para ir construyendo -en conjunto-nuevos modos de ver y manejar los sistemas productivos.E l Cinturón Hortícola de La Plata (CHLP) se caracteriza por la existencia de pequeños agricultores familiares cuya producción se desarrolla en quintas de 7 hectáreas promedio y producen hasta 30 cultivos diferentes que abastecen entre 60% y 90% de la verdura fresca que consume Buenos Aires y alrededores (Benencia, 2002).Este sector se caracteriza por un alto grado de descapitalización y precariedad en la tenencia de la tierra. La situación económica general les impide adoptar los paquetes tecnológicos completos y esta realidad los pone en desventaja, ocasionándoles una serie de perjuicios productivos -siguen sin resolver los problemas de plagas, malezas y enfermedades-, pero también socioambientales, pues en muchos casos aplican químicos muy tóxicos y de amplio espectro que suelen ser más económicos, pero más peligrosos (Marasas y otros, 2012).Frente a estos problemas ambientales y sociales aparece la necesidad de avanzar hacia una propuesta alternativa. Algunos productores convencionales, que hasta hace un tiempo priorizaban la adopción de las pautas hegemónicas de producción, se manifiestan interesados en realizar cambios con el fin de lograr sistemas con menor dependencia de insumos externos contaminantes, y así mejorar la posibilidad de su permanencia en la actividad.Para ello se requiere conocer más profundamente cuáles son las estrategias productivas que se realizan en los distintos sistemas de producción del CHLP, así como el estado de los recursos disponibles en el agroecoesistema, entre ellos la agrobiodiversidad tanto cultivada como asociada.Este artículo hace referencia a una experiencia de trabajo colectivo que inicia un proceso de generación de conocimientos a partir de la articulación interinstitucional, incluyendo a técnicos e investigadores del Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), la Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP) y los productores de las organizaciones del sector de la agricultura familiar. En particular, se trabajó con la Cooperativa de Trabajo Espacio de intercambio de saberes y acuerdos de trabajo entre técnicos, investigadores y productores Ante la demanda creciente de tecnologías alternativas de producción acordes a las necesidades de la agricultura familiar (AF), se propuso pensar en el manejo de la agrobiodiversidad y del hábitat como opciones de control biológico por conservación para regular las plagas y así disminuir la dependencia de insumos externos. Para generar dichas tecnologías es necesario, por un lado, contar con un mayor conocimiento de la agrobiodiversidad como proveedora de funciones y servicios ecológicos y, por el otro, desmitificar la idea de que todo insecto que aparece en el sistema es \"malo\" y hay que eliminarlo antes de que sea tarde.El desafío fue identificar la existencia de estos componentes de la agrobiodiversidad en las quintas de los productores y reconocerlos como herramientas útiles de manejo a la hora de pensar colectivamente en alternativas para la resolución de los problemas planteados más arriba.Se acordaron con los grupos de productores, tres localidades del CHLP. En cada una se trabajó en tres tipos de quintas con los siguientes manejos: con base agroecológica (AGROEC), convencionales de alto uso de insumos químicos (CONV) y convencionales de bajo uso de insumos químicos (BI).Para conocer y reconocer los complejos de biodiversidad presentes en las quintas y sus diferencias según el tipo de manejo. Esto permitirá diseñar estrategias participativas de control biológico por conservación en vías de disminuir o suprimir la necesidad de aplicar agroquímicos.Se estudió la agrobiodiversidad en tres ambientes de cada quinta: frontera entre lotes cultivados (F), borde del lote cultivado (B) y lote cultivado (LC) (figura 1). La metodología de recolección de datos fue: por observación directa de artrópo-dos, con trampas amarillas y red de arrastre y por observación y colecta de vegetación. Luego se determinaron y cuantificaron los ejemplares, identificando los mismos en función del rol ecológico que potencialmente ocupan en el sistema.Los resultados de esta investigación muestran que el sector hortícola familiar menos capitalizado aún mantiene cierta agrobiodiversidad en sus establecimientos. Es interesante destacar que inclusive en los productores convencionales de alto uso de insumos, existen zonas de refugio de biodiversidad (B y F), que probablemente estarían inhibidas en su accionar por el uso de insumos químicos. En las quintas de base agroecológica, por el contrario, al no usar agroquímicos, los enemigos naturales de los ambientes menos disturbados colonizan el LC y operan en el control de plagas.Los productores que usan insumos químicos, al reconocer el potencial biológico que poseen, podrían a través de estrategias de reconversión recuperar el rol de la diversidad en la regulación de plagas y así prescindir paulatinamente de los insecticidas.Un resultado valioso de esta experiencia fue el trabajo grupal con todos los actores del proceso, el intercambio con otros grupos de productores y la participación en los talleres de presentación y socialización de la propuesta de investigación. El desafío es continuar este trabajo, con el fin de avanzar en el Fuente: elaboración propia.Fuente: elaboración propia.28 | LEISA revista de agroecología | 30-1 biodiversidad/horticultura campesina análisis participativo de los resultados obtenidos y en la construcción colectiva de propuestas que permitan revalorizar y resignificar los conocimientos adquiridos para elaborar una estrategia apropiable por el sector. Y para finalizar, cabe una reflexión acerca de la agricultura familiar y su relación con la biodiversidad: conocer y reconocer la agrobiodiversidad resulta un recurso clave para defender y mejorar las condiciones del sector y la sustentabilidad de la producción, pero también es fundamental conocer y reconocer el rol protagónico de los agricultores familiares, como guardianes de dicha agrobiodiversidad, diferencia notoria y significativa con respecto a los sistemas empresariales de producción e importante a la hora de pensar en políticas públicas que premien esta función. José Antonio Casimiro González, agricultor familiar cubano, presenta la experiencia de su finca como un proceso que brinda alternativas para revertir los procesos de erosión en el campo, recuperando y manteniendo la biodiversidad como factor de sostenibilidad productiva.Nuestra finca tiene alrededor de 10 hectáreas y allí vivimos desde hace 20 años. Al inicio, como principiantes de ese inmenso mundo de la agroecología, con gran entusiasmo y tratando de hacer todo lo que oíamos que era bueno, llenamos la finca de cuanta planta y animal pudimos. Pensábamos que eso era biodiversidad, agroecología, porque todo no era de lo mismo. Al ir superando etapas por conocimientos adquiridos de los demás y lo que nos decía nuestro propio sistema, es que llegamos a conclusiones que queremos compartir. Una finca sostenible es un campo infinito para la creatividad y a cada familia le tocará su gran paquete de errores, lo que no quiere decir que esto no esté dentro de lo normal, porque un sistema agroecológico sostenible vivirá en un permanente rediseño y esto es parte de lo más excitante, ya que todo se puede mejorar y perfeccionar eternamente.Luego del encuentro con el movimiento agroecológico también lo hicimos con los permacultores, que en nuestro caso fue un salto hacia el futuro, porque la familia se vio involucrada desde el inicio en cursos de permacultura.Lo que, al lado de lo que veníamos haciendo, nos dotó de herramientas imprescindibles para la toma de decisiones muy actualizadas para la pequeña finca.Con elementos científicos para el diseño sostenible de la finca agroecológica familiar, se hizo evidente que muchas cosas las estábamos haciendo por gusto, sin sentido y que aquello tenía de todo, menos de biodiversidad: era un verdadero bio-conflicto.Al analizar los problemas y buscarles solución -hilvanando la teoría con la práctica-comprendimos que la verdadera diversidad ecológica teníamos que conquistarla atrayendo, en primer orden, la fauna silvestre y para ello iniciamos los cercos vivos. En total establecimos diversidad de árboles a lo largo de 5 km, tanto en los linderos como internamente y los intercalamos con piña de ratón (Bromelia pinguin L.), moreras, guayabas, plátanos, sin orden preestablecido. Ahora que tenemos abundantes plátanos los 365 días del año, también nos damos el lujo de tener casi siempre racimos maduros en las matas para que todo el mundo se sirva y las avispas liben el néctar durante la época seca.Hoy nos parece que mantener la biodiversidad en la finca no es un problema, pero claro, hay muchos detalles que atender y lo lindo es que depende de nosotros lograrlo.Según fuimos avanzando, comenzamos a entender que los guanajos (Meleagris gallopavo) se subían a los árboles y comían las frutas maduras, desmontaban los arropes deDesde el campo: opinión paja de arroz en los ajos y las cebollas, se comían la yuca, los carneros y los chivos, nos dejaban más problemas que beneficios. A muchas cosas tuvimos que renunciar y siempre fueron decisiones con mucha oposición.Un sistema agroecológico que se analiza y observa cada día se va convirtiendo en algo muy natural, teniendo en cuenta que son espacios creados según la capacidad de la familia, el lugar, la altura, el clima, la cultura. La agroecología familiar de las pequeñas fincas puede ser el eslabón perdido que le falta hoy a lugares sin vida que han perdido el suelo, porque se ha salinizado o contaminado, o son invadidos por el marabú (Dichrostachys cinerea).Creo que la biodiversidad puede retornar de la mano de los pequeños agricultores apoyados por proyectos estatales que dignifiquen esta forma de vida, hay que conquistar el talento que emigró del campo cuando este aún estaba bien, para salvar lo que no funcionó y que solo el amor y la inteligencia podrá recuperar. ¿Cómo lograr esto? Creando la misma expectativa que los tentó a ir a la ciudad, pero bien multiplicada, que les ofrezca seguridad para retornar a salvar lo que está por perderse: la cultura de la familia viviendo en el campo. La finca agroecológica podría ocupar grandes extensiones de tierra dividida en espacios donde cada núcleo familiar tenga su finquita, y así hacer realidad el sueño de llevar la agroecología a cualquier lugar sin importar cuán demasiado grande parezca. Sí es posible la biodiversidad, y este sería uno de los grandes secretos para mí, un método que revierta el problema en solución; cada familia, por naturaleza, podrá encontrar la cultura de convivencia con su sistema.Cuando se asocia la teoría científica con la experiencia práctica se puede ver lo que se puede hacer tan solo con la selección y mejora de la semilla, la siembra de cada cultivo en el momento de su ciclo óptimo y en la cantidad que permita ofrecerle toda la atención y el agua que requiera, para que se vea el sentido máximo de la biodiversidad.Nuestra finca \"Del Medio\" se ubica en la localidad de Siguaney, municipio Taguasco, provincia Sancti Spíritus, a un lado de la Autopista Nacional en el kilómetro 349. Somos parte de la Cooperativa de Créditos y Servicios (CCS) Rolando Reina Ramos.José Antonio Casimiro González Leidy Casimiro Rodríguezleidic@uniss.edu.cu A consecuencia de lo anterior surgió la iniciativa de establecimiento de este Centro de Resguardo. La metodología empleada para establecerlo ha consistido en: 1) contactar a personas con saberes sobre plantas medicinales de las comunidades, 2) realizar caminatas etnobotánicas por las diferentes comunidades, 3) acondicionar un espacio dentro de la Estación Experimental para la siembra de plantas medicinales y aromáticas, 4) registrar los usos que dan en las comunidades visitadas a las especies a resguardar, 5) realizar una permanentemente articulación con las familias de las diferentes comunidades para el intercambio de plantas y el registro de saberes, 6) manejar las plantas agroecológicamente y 7)declarar al Centro en construcción permanente.A propósito del establecimiento de este Centro, se apunta hacia la promoción de la investigación en el tema, facilitar la formación en las comunidades en cuanto al uso consciente de plantas medicinales, promover estrategias de transmisión de este conocimiento entre las familias de las comunidades, resguardar los saberes populares sobre su uso y, como un aspecto de valor inmensurable, resguardar la biodiversidad.OLGA MONAGAS, yONy CARMONA, tuLiO CARMONA E l Centro de Resguardo es un espacio donde se establecen y reproducen plantas medicinales y aromáticas, asociándose especies silvestres y cultivadas, y donde además se registran los conocimientos populares sobre sus usos. Se encuentra ubicada en la Estación Experimental Cataurito de la Universidad Nacional Experimental Simón Rodríguez (UNESR), en el Valle de Tucutunemo, Zamora, estado Aragua, Venezuela. Esta iniciativa nace de la interrelación que establece la institución con las familias de las comunidades aledañas a través de sus trabajadores y trabajadoras. La principal misión de la institución es preservar la diversidad biológica y cultural relacionada con las plantas medicinales y aromáticas.El Centro permite la interacción con vecinos así como también con personas e instituciones interesadas en el tema, intercambiando especies de plantas y saberes sobre sus formas de uso. Es un trabajo continuo y en construcción permanente.Cercanas a la Estación Experimental se encuentran varias comunidades y es común ver entre las familias que allí residen el uso de plantas medicinales para atender algunas enfermedades. Sin embargo, tanto estas plantas como sus usos corren el riesgo de desaparecer a causa del uso indiscriminado, el rompimiento de la cadena de transmisión Plantas medicinales establecidas en asociación, ubicadas en el Centro de Resguardo Autores El señor irene de la comunidad de El Onoto, ha contribuido con sus saberes y sus plantas al fortalecimiento del Centro de Resguardo de plantas medicinales de la Estación Cataurito de la Universidad Simón Rodríguez Hierba buena Mentha spicata L.Curia moradaPoleo Mentha pulehium L.Rosmarinus officinalis L.Tomillo Thymus vulgaris L.Origanum majorana L.Argalia Hibiscus abelmoschus L.Flor de jamaica Hibiscus sabdariffaOcimum sanctum L.Ocimun basilicum L.Cadillo pata 'e perro Urena lobata L.Sábila Aloe vera L.Granada Punica granatum L.Ñongue Datura stramonium L.Lantana trifolia L.Lantana camara L.Llantén Plantago major L.Moringa Moringa oleífera L.Siempre viva Gomphrena globosa L.Túa túa Jatropha gossypiifolia L.Onoto Bixa orellana L.Noni Morinda citrifolia L.Mangifera indica L.Plectranthus neochilusEs importante socializar que el uso indiscriminado coloca a las plantas en riesgo de desaparecer. Es notorio que al momento de conocerse las propiedades medicinales de una planta, crece rápidamente su demanda pasando por la posibilidad de agotar la permanencia de la misma en espacios silvestres, o, por otro lado, la introducción de plantas foráneas que se convierten en invasoras, socavando de ambas maneras la biodiversidad local. Un ejemplo de ello son algunas especies del género Kalanchoe, reportándose en México la Kalanchoe delagoensis (Altamirano y otros, 2012) y la Kalanchoe daigremontiana en zonas semiáridas de Venezuela (Herrera y otros, 2011). Muchos autores expresan que las actividades humanas constituyen uno de los elementos aceleradores de los procesos de invasión más importantes (Elton, 1958;Mooney y Hobbs, 2000;Kolar y Lodge, 2001;Keane y Crawley, 2002, citados por García y otros, 2012).A medida que pasa el tiempo, ya en los patios de las casas de las comunidades se van distanciando algunas plantas, y estableciéndose plantas que no son de la localidad, pasando esto muchas veces por el boom que surge con el uso de una especie para algunas enfermedades. En tanto la gente conozca las consecuencias de eliminar o introducir una especie en los patios, se contribuirá desde la familia a amparar la biodiversidad local.Estación Experimental Cataurito, UNESR olgamarlenemonagas@gmail.com En los últimos años los servicios intangibles que brindan los pastizales de Sudamérica tomaron importancia, principalmente los rioplatenses de la Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay y sur de Brasil. Los pastizales rioplatenses de la Argentina pertenecen en parte a la subregión conocida como Pampa Deprimida. Una porción importante de este paisaje ha sido fuertemente afectada por el proceso de agriculturización. Paradójicamente, en la región argentina existen áreas ubicadas en los alrededores de los grandes cascos urbanos que aún conservan superficies importantes de tierras cubiertas por pastizales naturales manejados por pequeños productores familiares.A ctualmente existen establecimientos de pequeñas producciones ganaderas de economías de reducida escala que abarcan a una cantidad importante de productores, muchos de ellos con tambos que cuentan con pocos animales, generalmente de 2 a 10, en etapa ordeño, dedicados a la producción de masa, a partir de leche cuajada, que comercializan con fábricas locales de mozzarella.Las familias tamberas también crían cerdos y gallinas. A estos productores se les considera como agricultores familiares pues no cuentan con trabajo asalariado y la familia o parte de ella conforma el equipo de trabajo con distintas funciones. Estas unidades productivas mantienen las características de la actividad agropecuaria vinculada al patrimonio familiar, como son la preservación del bien -la tierra-, el acervo cultural y la inserción de la familia como \"sujeto social\". Este grupo de productores pertenece históricamente a un segmento de la población con escasos recursos económicos y técnicos, y con pocas posibilidades para mejorar su producción actual. Sin embargo, su presencia y trabajo ayudan a la preservación del medio ambiente y a la conservación de la biodiversidad en zonas cercanas a las grandes urbes con serios problemas de contaminación ambiental (Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina). Los pequeños productores suelen ser solidarios con sus vecinos, amigos o familiares productores. Algunos de ellos arriendan las tierras para pastar a cambio de trabajo o por muy poco dinero, lo que les permite ser laboralmente autónomos pero dependientes de sus pares. La mayoría de los productores habita en tierras que no son de su propiedad y comercializa directamente su producción, a diferencia de algunos pocos que dependen de las condiciones y precios definidos por Este proyecto de extensión se realiza con el objetivo de promover, acompañar y mejorar la productividad de los pequeños productores tamberos bajo principios de sostenibilidad ecológica. Los productores pertenecen a los partidos de San Vicente y Cañuelas, provincia de Buenos Aires.El proyecto propuso dar un tratamiento diferencial a los pequeños ganaderos, ya que conforman uno de los grupos más vulnerables de la población rural y suburbana. En este sentido diseñamos estrategias para suplir las dificultades que tiene esta comunidad de productores para incorporar tecnologías de procesos que contribuyan a conservar y mejorar la cantidad y calidad de alimento para los animales en producción.Realizamos la labor en dos etapas: la primera consiste en el acercamiento hacia el productor para interiorizarnos en la información del establecimiento desde el punto de vista productivo-social y ambiental. Para ello realizamos una selección de productores a los cuales denominamos unidades demostrativas (UD). Luego de la interpretación y análisis de la información, definimos la problemática de cada productor involucrado. Con esta información organizamos una reunión en cada UD para comunicar la propuesta de manejo de los recursos forrajeros, con principal atención al pastizal natural. En cada reunión de campo, abierta a toda la comunidad, se proponen mecanismos de inclusión mediante charlas directas con el productor y los otros productores que participan de la visita. Esto permite acompañar a cada uno de los que pertenecen a la unidad demostrativa y a todos aquellos que asisten a la charla, pero principalmente fomenta la implementación de tecnologías para la integración y transformación agroecológica. La segunda etapa es la divulgación de las prácticas recomendadas a través de material escrito, usando volantes y folletos. Las prácticas recomendadas se sustentan en fomentar el arraigo al campo y a la actividad, así como concientizar al productor del cuidado para la preservación de su pastizal natural.Al principio trabajamos bajo condiciones difíciles porque la participación de los productores era muy escasa en cada reunión a campo. Después de cuatro años aumentamos notablemente la participación de los productores en las reuniones y contamos con el apoyo de instituciones públicas como el Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) del Ministerio de Agricultura Ganadería y Pesca (MAGP), la Universidad Nacional de la Plata y la municipalidad local. Se aplicaron conceptos ecológicos al diseño y manejo de los recursos naturales, como manejo del pastoreo y usos de los descansos que fueron gratamente adoptados por los productores. Rediseñamos herramientas de manejo para mejorar la salud del suelo y la condición del pastizal, para impedir el reemplazo del pastizal natural por especies cultivadas anuales (Holechek y otros, 1989). Es importante encontrar el equilibrio que permita balancear los aspectos productivos con servicios ambientales como la conservación de las especies nativas, la vida silvestre y la calidad del agua.María C. Vecchio, María Isabel Lissarague, Lorena Mendicino, Bárbara Heguy, Anahí Musso Proyecto de extensión Sustentabilidad de productores ganaderos familiares en sistemas pastoriles, financiado por la Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina cristinave08@hotmail.comLa Pampa Deprimida constituye una porción importante de los pastizales del territorio argentino, caracterizada, en términos generales, por presentar un paisaje plano con excesos de humedad y presencia de salinidad y alcalinidad. Esta gran área (90.000 km2) que ocupa el centro-este de la provincia de Buenos Aires, está atravesando un fuerte proceso de agriculturización de la soja que ha eliminado más del 30% del recurso natural, que representa un importante refugio y hábitat de especies silvestres y el principal alimento para el ganado vacuno.Aunque la Pampa Deprimida posee rasgos de homogeneidad de paisaje, encierra una gran heterogeneidad florística (León y otros, 1979). En porciones pequeñas de superficie de suelo encontramos diferentes comunidades de plantas diferenciadas según su ubicación en el paisaje, como las lomas, medias lomas, bajos dulces y bajos alcalinos. Estas son notablemente distintas entre sí en cuanto a relieve, características de suelo y vegetación. Esta heterogeneidad puede ser claramente apreciada a simple vista, mirando un potrero de pequeña superficie, o en las imágenes satelitales o de Google Earth, valiosas herramientas que están fácilmente disponibles en la actualidad. Las comunidades naturales presentan cantidades significativas de especies vegetales -430 especies totales para toda la regiónprincipalmente gramíneas y leguminosas, que brindan una importante biodiversidad necesaria para sostener la vida de las especies silvestres y el hábitat saludable para el ciudadano común (Perelman y otros, 2001).Los pastizales de la región, que se ubican bordeando importantes ciudades, aseguran la presencia de humedales y además brindan forraje de muy buena calidad y cantidad a lo largo del año. Los humedales aportan servicios ambientales diversos, como son la regulación de aguas, la recarga de acuíferos y el mantenimiento de hábitat para la fauna local y migratoria. Los pastizales en áreas cercanas a las urbes actúan como redes ecológicas para la conservación de la biodiversidad.Las redes ecológicas son esenciales para la migración, la dispersión y el intercambio genético de las especies silvestres.Los modelos agrícolas vigentes en las últimas décadas han considerado, por lo general, que lo rural se identifica con lo atrasado y que por lo tanto debería modernizarse. Este foco de atención disminuyó la importancia de aspectos cruciales para el bienestar de las personas más allá de lo económico, perdiendo valor lo tradicional en pos de lo moderno.L a tecnificación de las labores rurales y el avance de la frontera agropecuaria sobre áreas naturales es uno de los factores más importantes en la disminución de la biodiversidad y produce erosión genética y cultural. La sistematización de tierras y su introducción al cultivo y a la producción pecuaria implica la retracción y desaparición de numerosas especies vegetales nativas, muchas de ellas con propiedades para uso alimenticio, forrajero, medicinal, industrial, tintóreo y como combustible. Todas estas especies fueron utilizadas por los pueblos originarios y aun por los primeros pobladores inmigrantes que llegaron a estas tierras.En la Patagonia argentina estos procesos son causa de la desertificación que se manifiesta en distintos grados según la zona. El factor desencadenante de mayor peso en este proceso es la pérdida de cobertura vegetal motivada por la introducción de ganado exótico sin aplicar medidas de conservación.La importancia de mantener la biodiversidad radica en que cada grupo de individuos cumple una función específica en el ecosistema. Al desaparecer una comunidad vegetal, desaparece, en forma paralela, la función que ese grupo de individuos realizaba en el sistema. Podría trazarse un paralelismo entre este concepto y el de diversidad cultural. La multiplicidad de culturas aporta a la visión compleja de la realidad, fundamental para establecer nuevas formas de desarrollo.El proceso de pérdida de diversidad florística está directamente relacionado con la erosión cultural, es decir que estamos frente a un proceso de disminución de la biodiversidad. Esta situación podría revertirse recorriendo el camino inverso al que se recorrió durante la modernidad, es decir revalorizando los saberes y prácticas tradicionales y, a la vez, cultivando especies nativas o exóticas utilizadas por los pobladores rurales. En esta línea es fundamental que la familia rural participe activamente en los proyectos de desarrollo, desde su concepción hasta su puesta en práctica.El reto de revertir el proceso de degradación de los ecosistemas y al mismo tiempo satisfacer las demandas crecientes de sus servicios, puede conseguirse en algunos escenarios aunque se requieren cambios significativos en las políticas y en las instituciones, además de innovaciones tecnológicas sustanciales y mejoras en la capacidad de las personas para gestionar los ecosistemas locales y para adaptarse a la alteración de los mismos (Norero y Pilatti, 2002).A partir de 1997 se ha llevado a cabo una experiencia conjunta con los pobladores de una comunidad originaria. El biodiversidad/saber local foco estuvo puesto en la revalorización de especies nativas y el cultivo de estas y otras introducidas con valor forrajero, alimenticio, medicinal y tintorero. En forma paralela se trabajó sobre la revalorización de los saberes y la cultura locales. Se abordó principalmente el cultivo de especies forrajeras debido a que los lugareños tienen como actividad productiva principal la cría extensiva de ganado caprino y en menor escala ovino (Bünzli, 2007). Además se abordó el cultivo de especies que ellos señalaron como comestibles (Prosopis spp.), además de las medicinales y combustibles.Desde el equipo de trabajo se reflexionó sobre la hipótesis de que el fuerte proceso de transculturización sufrido por los pueblos originarios podría haber debilitado la fuerte ligazón que estos pueblos manifiestan ancestralmente con la naturaleza. En este sentido, se consideró importante comenzar a trabajar en las escuelas de la comunidad, por lo que entre 2002 y 2004 se trabajó con los alumnos, docentes y padres que deseaban participar de una propuesta, que además de compartir conocimientos científicos y saberes empíricos con respecto al cultivo de especies nativas, tuvo como objetivo recuperar el saber ambiental latente en las familias de la comunidad. En esta ocasión se trabajó en forma paralela en la escuela de El Cuy, localidad de la Región Sur de Río Negro (mapa 1).La Comunidad Gramajo ha presentado una clara evolución desde que se comenzó este trabajo en 1997, sus actividades productivas se han diversificado, la utilización de plantas nativas e introducidas se ha incrementado y los propios integrantes de la comunidad han sido agentes multiplicadores, compartiendo estas prácticas con otras comunidades que habitan parajes cercanos en la provincia de Neuquén, como Las Lajas, Campana Mahuida (Loncopué), Los Hornos (Mariano Moreno), Los Catutos (a 20 km de Zapala) y Añelo (mapa 2).El grado de apropiación del cultivo de especies forrajeras nativas e introducidas ha alcanzado tal magnitud, que en la feria de Zapala de 2003 se organizó una capacitación para productores que fue dictada por una señora integrante de la comunidad. Ella junto con su marido fueron los que mayor impulso le dieron a esta propuesta. Más adelante, a medida que se fue difundiendo la experiencia, a través de personal vinculado al Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería se estableció un contacto con una comunidad indígena de Blancura Centro ubicada en la Región Sur de la provincia de Río Negro (Argentina), que propició el encuentro entre integrantes de las dos comunidades en octubre de 2009 (véase foto).En el marco de estos procesos que implican el compartir material reproductivo (semillas), técnicas de cultivo y experiencias con habitantes de otros parajes de la provincia, se observa la importante participación de los pobladores de la Comunidad Gramajo en el desarrollo del proyecto original. Ellos son los actores que han tenido un rol fundamental en la difusión de la técnica del cultivo de especies adaptadas a las condiciones climáticas de la zona. A través de todos estos años de trabajo constante se ha concretado la revalorización de sus saberes y el empoderamiento de los integrantes de esta comunidad.La evolución del cultivo y la creciente participación de la comunidad Gramajo en este proyecto permiten formular la conclusión de que la gestión de la vegetación por los actores directos es posible. Por otra parte, la participación activa de los destinatarios de un proyecto de recuperación de la vegetación nativa es fundamental para garantizar su continuidad en el tiempo, ya que al aportar su saber ambiental aumentan las posibilidades de colaborar en el diseño de estrategias para la utilización sostenible de los recursos.A través de este trabajo se ha logrado recuperar, al menos parcialmente, saberes asociados a las plantas nativas y su uso sistemático, hecho que se evidencia en la práctica continua de cultivar especies tanto nativas como introducidas que luego se utilizarán en distintas aplicaciones. De esta manera se está logrando paulatinamente evitar el sobreuso de las plantas que crecen espontáneamente y así se contribuye a detener el proceso de desertificación y, simultáneamente, para los lugareños es posible continuar con su principal actividad productiva.La recuperación de las prácticas y destrezas tradicionales y locales conducirá inevitablemente a la inclusión de los poseedores de estos valiosísimos saberes -que hoy forman parte de sectores marginados de la sociedad-en planes integrales de desarrollo rural.No obstante, son necesarias políticas estatales que provean asistencia técnica permanente, además de la provisión de algunos insumos.La elaboración de planes de restauración o rehabilitación deberán contemplar el aspecto tecnológico en forma paralela a la visión ambiental, territorial y cultural. Será necesario invertir en nuevos modelos de capacitación que superen las concepciones de asistencia técnica y extensión convencionales y se concentren en formar una nueva generación de técnicos y mediadores sociales capaces de comprender y apoyar un nuevo enfoque de desarrollo rural sostenible. Ahora que la implementación del programa está por concluir, la sostenibilidad de la iniciativa es un tema clave que se construye sobre tres pilares organizacionales. En primer lugar, una amplia base de profesionales (102 técnicos y 329 promotores/paratécnicos) capacitados y con habilidades para utilizar diferentes metodologías para transferir conocimientos y servir de guías a los productores. En segundo lugar, el incremento paulatino de la productividad, lo que se traduce en mayores ingresos y, a su vez, en acceso a los mercados de alto valor. PROCASO ha apoyado a 41 cooperativas y empresas exportadoras llegando a 9.000 productores. Por último, la existencia y vigencia del equipo técnico del programa a través de financiamiento de otros donantes y algunos de los implementadores después de la finalización de PROCASO permite asegurar una fuente de conocimiento y herramientas para que las cooperativas continúen creciendo.La revisión de algunos casos particulares permite apreciar el impacto positivo que PROCASO ha tenido sobre los pequeños productores (y sus familias), sus ingresos, productividad y prácticas. El caso de la sociedad anónima Café Orgánico Marcala S.A. (COMSA), de honduras, es un buen ejemplo. Fundada en 2001 por 62 productores, en 2013 contaba con 840 productores (de los cuales el 26% son mujeres) que producen entre 95.000 y 120.000 quintales de café por temporada sobre un terreno de 2.646 hectáreas. Desde que consiguió las certificaciones sostenibles (UTZ Certified, Orgánica, Comercio Justo y Café Manos de Mujer) sus mercados se concentran en el exterior, con Europa, Estados unidos y, recientemente, China como principales compradores. y si a nivel productivo y de ingresos la evolución es innegable, no hay que dejar de mencionar que PROCASO tiene también consecuencias positivas sobre el capital humano de las comunidades y familias involucradas; para los socios de la cooperativa se reflejan en beneficios educativos como becas universitarias para los hijos de los productores, conseguidos gracias a los premios por certificación. Y es que las certificaciones sostenibles han hecho posibles los vínculos directos con los mercados de café diferenciados para los pequeños productores, lo cual significa un gran avance comercial.El caso de la Cooperativa de Servicios Múltiples La Unión, de Nicaragua, miembro de la Unión de Cooperativas de Servicios Multiples del Norte de Nicaragua (UCOSEMUN), es otro ejemplo del impacto que PROCASO tiene sobre sus asociados. Después de cuatro años de vinculación al programa se pueden contar beneficios como la presencia de un equipo técnico con capacidades para desarrollar las actividades de extensión rural, la internalización de metodologías de enseñanza que los productores mismos pueden utilizar con sus compañeros, la presencia permanente de intercambios de experiencias entre organizaciones, la obtención de la certificación sostenible (UTZ Certified), la implementación de buenas prácticas agrícolas, la formación técnica vocacional para los hijos e hijas de los productores y la incursión en mercados novedosos con nuevos compradores.En una escala mayor, tenemos el ejemplo de la Cooperativa de Servicios Múltiples Santiago, constituida en Nicaragua en 1994 y también miembro de la uCOSEMuN. Esta fue una de las primeras cooperativas en trabajar con PROCASO con el objetivo de Financiado por Solidaridad (www. solidaridadnetwork.org), con fondos de irishAid (www.irishaid.ei) e implementado por el SNV (www.snvworld.org) entre 2009 y 2013, el Programa de Calidad Sostenible (PROCASO) buscaba mejorar la productividad e ingresos de los pequeños productores y productoras de café en Honduras y Nicaragua. también tiene presencia, aunque menor, en México y Guatemala. Para ello se impulsó la implementación de buenas prácticas productivas y el acceso sostenible a mercados de alto valor, transformando positivamente el proceso productivo tradicional del café.Otro componente de primera importancia fue el fortalecimiento de capacidades, que se refleja en las habilidades de los equipos técnicos para brindar asistencia en campo; lo que se logró a través de capacitaciones y talleres, promoción de cursos e-learning, uso de herramientas y metodologías de capacitación, las alianzas de escuelas especializadas en cultivo y procesamiento de café, y el establecimiento de programas de formación técnica para personal de las organizaciones y jóvenes, estos últimos destinados principalmente a los hijos de las familias participantes en la cadena productiva del café. El tercer y último componente clave es el fortalecimiento de la gestión comercial, que implica la maduración de contactos de mercado, la visita de compradores, la participación en ferias de importancia internacional, el desarrollo de perfiles de taza y la realización de talleres de cata, tostado de café y giras comerciales nacionales e internacionales. La suma de estos tres componentes hizo posible el funcionamiento adecuado de PROCASO y la expansión del programa para replicar el impacto positivo en la vida de los beneficiarios.36 | LEISA revista de agroecología | 30-1 Empacando café orgánico para su comercialización PROCASO solucionar algunas problemáticas constantes como la contaminación de las fincas, el mal manejo agronómico de los cafetales y la fluctuación de los precios del café. Los beneficios que se ha logrado obtener en esta experiencia son similares a los mencionados en los casos revisados, pero incluyen también el mejoramiento de la infraestructura productiva cafetalera gracias a la construcción de beneficios húmedos y el uso de parcelas demostrativas para la enseñanza, así como el fortalecimiento de las capacidades y competencias organizativas del personal de la cooperativa y de los socios.también se encuentran casos de pequeños grupos de productores que, de la mano del programa, han logrado darle una evolución positiva a sus cultivos y a sus negocios como en el caso de la Asociación PILARH, organización sin fines de lucro creada en 1997 en Honduras con el objetivo explícito de apoyar Solidaridad es una organización sin fines de lucro que apoya la transición hacia una economía inclusiva, en la que las personas pueden participar plenamente. Solidaridad persigue una transformación del mercado impulsada por el sector privado. Sin embargo, las organizaciones de la sociedad civil y los gobiernos juegan un papel esencial en la activación y fomento del proceso de cambio. En este proceso, Solidaridad es un gestor de transición que apoya a los agricultores económicamente pobres, pero que tienen gran potencial en el emprendimiento y trabajo de sus mujeres y varones, quienes quieren construir sus medios de vida en base a ingresos justos. Los socios de Solidaridad y todos los involucrados en la cadena productiva cumplen un rol importante, porque el cambio es lo que importa.En Honduras, conversación entre técnicos sobre el estado del cultivo PROCASO a los productores con la compra de terrenos, el acompañamiento de sus ciclos productivos, la capacitación, la asistencia técnica y el otorgamiento de pequeños financiamientos. PILARH ha trabajado desde el inicio con un modelo bifocal: por un lado existe la preocupación por fomentar la diversificación de las fincas con la ayuda de los empresarios agrícolas dedicados al cultivo de granos básicos, al café, la agricultura y la apicultura, y por otro, la firme decisión de integrar esas fincas diversificadas a los circuitos productivos de empresarios no agrícolas dedicados a rubros como la panadería, o su engarzamiento en procesos como la producción de alimentos con inclusión de género, el mantenimiento de huertos familiares y el rescate de plantas autóctonas. El resultado ha incentivado, en el caso del café, la producción de café de calidad, el uso de secadores solares y la conformación de dos empresas de servicios múltiples: Aroma y Sabor de Occidente y Oro Verde. Si bien PiLARh no acopia café, sí brinda acompañamiento a estas dos empresas en el proceso de comercialización, dando seguimiento y acompañando el establecimiento de contactos con compradores y la negociación de mejores precios que los usuales.Como se desprende de las experiencias revisadas, PROCASO ha logrado resultados positivos a pequeña, mediana y gran escala, abarcando el espectro completo de los productores de café y de las actividades relacionadas. Las experiencias brevemente reseñadas no hacen más que confirmar el éxito que el Programa de Calidad Sostenible ha tenido y sigue teniendo a la hora de apoyar a los productores y mejorar sus prácticas tradicionales. hoy en día, estos productores pueden ofrecer para la exportación un café oro generoso con el ambiente y de primera calidad.LEISA revista de agroecología | 30-1 | 37Sus actividades abarcan el desarrollo de cadenas productivas como las del café, el té, el cacao, las frutas, los textiles, el algodón, la soja, la caña, el oro, la ganadería y el aceite de palma. En dichas cadenas, Solidaridad brinda servicios a productores como: capacitación en buenas prácticas agrícolas, desarrollo de capacidades y fortalecimiento a sus organizaciones incluyendo la asistencia para acceder a medios de producción, financiamiento y mercados. También apoya a las organizaciones de productores y empresas productoras para el acceso a la certificación de estándares sociales y ambientales, y a otras empresas para establecer políticas de responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC) y cadenas sostenibles de abastecimiento, desarrollo de conceptos de productos y negocios sostenibles que amplíen el mercado para los países en desarrollo. Este apoyo comprende también el asesoramiento para el mercadeo y la comunicación sobre RSC, para una mejor información de los consumidores y los socios comerciales.En el vivero con las plántulas de café PROCASOCasablanca: biogás para la familia campesinaCarmen Felipe-Morales es ingeniera agrónoma y doctora en ciencias del suelo. Con su esposo Ulises Moreno, también ingeniero agrónomo, conducen la finca Bioagricultura Casa Blanca, centro de producción, capacitación e investigación agroecológica y agroecoturismo, situado en el distrito de Pachacamac, provincia de Lima, Perú.Entrevista: teobaldo PinzásCarmen Felipe-Morales con los participantes en el curso teórico-práctico sobre biodigestores en Bioagricultura Casa Blanca T. GianellaA partir de la investigación y la experiencia de Casa Blanca, ¿cómo se puede adaptar la producción y utilización de biogás a la agricultura familiar de pequeña escala?En la finca Bioagricultura Casa Blanca construimos en 1994 un biodigestor modelo chino de 10 m 3 de capacidad para la producción de biogás y bioabonos, utilizando como insumo principal el estiércol de los cuyes que criamos. Con base en estas experiencias hemos podido llegar a las siguientes conclusiones:• El guano de cuy, a través de un proceso de descomposición anaeróbica que ocurre en el biodigestor, produce una fuente de energía como es el biogás, además de excelentes abonos: líquido (biol) y sólido (biosol). • El modelo de digestor más adecuado para la realidad de nuestro país, en especial para la sierra, que es la zona donde hay mayor pobreza rural, es el modelo chino. Por su sencillez es el que mejor se adapta a un manejo familiar que tradicionalmente recae en la mujer. También el que se construya en una excavación lo aísla de las temperaturas frías en las zonas altas. Puede ser construido utilizando materiales disponibles localmente, lo cual reduce los costos de construcción. • Para obtener la mayor eficiencia en la producción de biogás es importante la determinación de las debidas proporciones en la mezcla de paja y estiércol (precompost). Por ello, se requiere adecuada capacitación y acompañamiento técnico hasta que se logre manejar este aspecto. Durante el gobierno del General Velasco Alvarado, el ITINTEC construyó biodigestores en varios lugares del país, pero luego de un tiempo fueron dejados en abandono. La excepción fueron los biodigestores que se construyeron en el valle de Siguas, Arequipa, donde la empresa de la leche Gloria estaba interesada, más que en el gas, en el biol, para que sus proveedores de leche lo apliquen en sus campos de alfalfa, demostrando en ensayos realizados con la universidad San Agustín que el rendimiento de este cultivo se incrementaba hasta en un 50% al aplicársele biol al follaje. Ello motivó a los agricultores a construir biodigestores con apoyo de la empresa y, sobre todo, motivó a las esposas al obtener unEsperamos noticias de los lectores sobre experiencias con energías de fuentes renovables. Enviarlas a Teobaldo Pinzás, tpinzas@etcandes.com.pe gas limpio y barato. • Los mejores resultados se han obtenido con estiércol de cuy, que tiene una capacidad energética tres veces superior a la del estiércol de res. Esto resulta muy conveniente para las familias rurales, especialmente de la sierra, porque la crianza doméstica del cuy es muy común en los Andes.Una familia campesina que trate de generar biogás a partir de los desechos agrícolas y el estiércol de sus animales ¿qué necesidades de energía podría satisfacer?Con un biodigestor mínimo de 5 m 3 de capacidad una familia campesina podría disponer de biogás para cocinar, alimentándolo dos veces por semana con guano de cuy y agua. Este volumen no permite la generación de electricidad, pero si podría usarse para encender una lámpara a gas. Las ventajas para la familia campesina son varias. En las zonas altas ya se utiliza el estiércol para cocinar pero como bosta seca, que se quema en fogones dentro de ambientes cerrados, lo cual es perjudicial para la salud. El biogás generado en la finca cubrirá una parte de las necesidades de la familia; para satisfacer otras necesidades se puede recurrir a otras fuentes renovables, por ejemplo a la energía solar, mediante la instalación de paneles solares fotovoltaicos.¿Qué cantidad de cuyes necesita una familia para generar biogás suficiente para la cocina?En Casablanca, para cargar semanalmente el biodigestor de 10 m 3 necesitamos alrededor de 300 cuyes. Esta carga nos puede producir hasta 3 m 3 de biogás por día. Para un Biodigestor de 5 m 3 se requerirían unos 150 cuyes.¿No es ese un número de animales que excede al que pueden mantener las familias?No necesariamente, porque en los últimos años ha aumentado mucho la demanda de carne de cuy y sus precios de mercado, en el marco del llamado boom gastronómico, y muchas familias han aumentado su producción de cuyes para aprovechar esta tendencia de la demanda.Hay también experiencias a gran escala. Por ejemplo, la empresa La Calera, que tiene alrededor de 4 millones de gallinas ponedoras, ha construido biodigestores de gran tamaño, modelo alemán, inicialmente para ahorrar en el consumo de energía pero actualmente también produce y vende biol.En lo que se refiere a experiencias con agricultores familiares campesinos, el Instituto para una Alternativa Agraria ha ensayado con biodigestores de geomembrana en la microcuenca de Jabón Mayo, Canas, Cusco, a alturas de 4.000 msnm, utilizando fitotoldos para contrarrestar la baja temperatura y generar un ambiente adecuado para el biodigestor. Pero es verdad que todavía debería difundirse más el uso de biodigestores porque es una alternativa que, en las zonas en que existe leña, ahorra a las mujeres el trabajo de buscarla, y además proporciona el biol, que es un excelente activador biológico del crecimiento y floración de las plantas, que se aplica principalmente al follaje, y el biosol que es un fertilizante orgánico de gran calidad y se aplica al suelo.Para que un biodigestor sea efectivo en las zonas altoandinas es necesario que sea construido con asesoramiento técnico y capacitación para su mantenimiento y uso.Finca Bioagricultura Casa Blanca carmenfm@terra.com.pe Biodigestor de geomembrana T. GianellaBiodigestores domésticos en África: el programa ABPP harrie Oppenoorth Desde 2009 se desarrollan programas nacionales de desarrollo del mercado y del sector de biodigestores en cinco países de África (Burkina Fasso, Etiopía, Kenya, Uganda y Tanzania). Estos programas se inician con la creación de demanda mediante la promoción acerca de qué es un biodigestor y cuáles son sus beneficios para el agricultor familiar campesino que produce cultivos y cría algunos animales (vacunos o porcinos). Paralelamente se capacitan albañiles en la construcción de biodigestores de ladrillos. La idea básica es que estos albañiles se conviertan en pequeñas empresas que venden biodigestores a las familias campesinas. Para cubrir el costo de los biodigestores (US$500-700 para un digestor de 6 m 3 ) se organiza también la provisión de créditos mediante organizaciones microfinancieras o cooperativas de ahorro y crédito. También se involucran ONG de desarrollo rural para la promoción y para la capacitación en el uso de biol, el efluente del digestor.La familia mezcla diariamente dos baldes de estiércol con dos baldes de agua y los introduce al digestor. Esta cantidad de materia prima da unos 5 m 3 de biogás, suficiente para cocinar todas las comidas del día y para alimentar una lámpara de biogás durante algunas horas. Como ya no es necesario recolectar leña, las mujeres ahorran ese tiempo y se evita la deforestación para energía doméstica. La cocina y las ollas quedan limpias y se elimina el humo que afecta a la salud. El biol permite fertilizar aproximadamente una hectárea de cultivos y, si se composta con desechos agrícolas, hasta 3 a 5 hectáreas. El biol da mejores resultados en los cultivos que el estiércol crudo ya que el nitrógeno después de la digestión anaeróbica se asimila más fácilmente por las plantas.Hasta ahora se han instalado en los cinco países más de 42.000 digestores y en otro programa de Hivos en Indonesia unos 12.000 más, también desde 2009. La diseminación aumenta exponencialmente y el número de pequeñas empresas que las instalan o construyen también. Se evitan la deforestación y las emisiones de gases con efecto invernadero ya que las familias dejan de usar leña y el metano emitido por el estiércol se captura en el digestor y se quema.En consecuencia, se trata de una tecnología con muchas ventajas para la familia campesina y, aplicando el enfoque de mercado e involucrando actores en la formación de un sector de biogás, se logra masificar hasta alcanzar decenas de miles de hogares.El Programa Alianza Africana de Biodigestores (ABPP por sus siglas en inglés) es apoyado financieramente por la Dirección General de Cooperación Internacional del Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores de Holanda. Los fondos son canalizados por Hivos, quien tiene a su cargo la gerencia del fondo y del programa, desde su oficina en Nairobi. SNV lleva a cabo el desarrollo de capacidades en los cinco países y la gestión de conocimiento a nivel internacional. En su segunda etapa, ABBP se propone llegar a 100.000 nuevos biodigestores domésticos. Los paisajes cambian a lo largo del tiempo, así como las estrategias de quienes viven en ellos. En todo el mundo el aumento de la población origina una presión creciente sobre la tierra, llevando a una competencia por los recursos existentes tanto entre comunidades rurales como al interior de ellas mismas. En la actualidad hay también grandes fuerzas externas que presionan por apropiarse de la tierra para cultivos agroindustriales, expansión urbana, turismo, explotaciones mineras y de hidrocarburos, y están en competencia desigual con los agricultores familiares por la tierra y el agua. Los agricultores familiares y las comunidades pastoriles y forestales dependen de su territorio para obtener alimentos, combustible, forraje, madera, plantas medicinales y otros bienes para satisfacer sus necesidades básicas. Para muchas comunidades rurales los paisajes tienen también importancia cultural. Sin embargo, generalmente son excluidas de las estructuras de gobernanza del territorio y del desarrollo de políticas para el manejo de recursos naturales.En los últimos años los enfoques de paisaje y los enfoques territoriales han atraído el interés de investigadores, responsables políticos, organizaciones no gubernamentales, organizaciones del sector privado y comunidades rurales por su utilidad como herramientas para comprender la multifuncionalidad y las demandas competitivas de los diferentes usuarios de la tierra. En preparación para el Foro Mundial de Paisajes, a realizarse en diciembre de este año en el Perú, LEISA revista de agroecología explorará los esfuerzos de los agricultores familiares y las demás comunidades rurales para construir y dar vida a paisajes sostenibles. ¿Cómo hacen estas comunidades y sus organizaciones para hacer frente a las crecientes presiones sobre sus recursos, sean estas presiones internas o externas, locales o globales? Buscamos artículos sobre las relaciones entre bosques, agricultura sostenible y paisaje y sobre la conexión entre el paisaje, el territorio, la cultura local y la economía de la región. Esperamos con interés artículos sobre la defensa de estos paisajes de las amenazas de las grandes industrias, empresas mineras y otras fuerzas. ¿Qué mecanismos y políticas de gobernanza se necesitan para garantizar que los derechos de las comunidades rurales se respeten? ¿Es posible alcanzar acuerdos de beneficio mutuo con otros usuarios del territorio que permitan a las comunidades locales fortalecer sus sistemas agroecológicos de producción? ¿Qué futuro esperan las comunidades rurales para ellas, sus paisajes y sus territorios? Damos la bienvenida a los artículos que cuenten con información que sustente la evidencia de las experiencias presesentadas. Todo artículo para LEISA 30-3 enviarlo antes del 22 de junio de 2014, a: Teresa Gianella-Estrems, editora. Correo electrónico: leisaal@etcandes.com.pe Desde los territorios libres de cultivos transgénicos: defensa de la soberanía alimentaria","tokenCount":"20622"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0765737789.json b/data/part_2/0765737789.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e110616bee404ab30a8be92121efe566c47ae42c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0765737789.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"72a00fbf69932f164ade86724eee89a1","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/74b195e9-500c-4bec-b002-e1dcc144470b/retrieve","id":"-964290201"},"keywords":["Activity factors","Colombian livestock sector","environmental impacts","factorial analysis of mixed data","livestock production systems","public policies"],"sieverID":"435d2f06-9209-449d-a161-a4e60ac9c1a2","pagecount":"15","content":"environmental characterization of Colombian beef cattle-fattening farms, with a focus on farm size and ways of improving production The International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) believes that open access contributes to its mission of reducing hunger and poverty, and improving human nutrition in the tropics through research aimed at increasing the eco-efficiency of agriculture.CIAT is committed to creating and sharing knowledge and information openly and globally. We do this through collaborative research as well as through the open sharing of our data, tools, and publications.Cattle-fattening, mostly under grazing conditions, is a very important economic activity in South America, with Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, and Colombia being the Latin-American countries with the largest beef herds (FAO, 2013). In 2015, the total number of cattle in the Colombian beef herd was 10,473,067, roughly 45.7% of the national cattle herd (DANE, 2017). Cattle-fattening accounts for 45.2% of the Colombian beef herd, with the remaining 54.8% distributed between cow-calf (40.4%) and full cycle (14.4%) activities (DANE, 2017).Together, traditional-extensive and improved-extensive grazing systems are used in approximately 90% of the Colombian beef farms (Mahecha-Ledesma et al., 2002). In these systems, animals graze on large plots and their diets may include native forage species, the growth of which is reduced under dry conditions, thus affecting biomass and feed supply (Barahona et al., 2003). Cattle-fattening occurs mainly on improved, extensively managed pastures, a land use that represents 49.1% of the beef industry. The use of extensive grazing, together with the low nutritional value of tropical grasses, has led to stagnation of the national herd size and to low productivity rates (ICA, 2017). Thus, although important for the country in terms of social and economic benefits, it is necessary to improve the productive parameters of Colombian beef farms.Carrying out characterization studies facilitates the identification of the main production, reproduction, economic, and environmental variables that determine the degree of heterogeneity among farms.Collection of accurate information is critical to conduct characterization studies, which, among other benefits, are useful in identifying inefficiencies, and in proposing good farming practices, technological strategies, and differential public policies for sectoral development. This is important when increasing productivity and reducing negative environmental impacts are policy priorities.In Colombia, characterizations of cattle-fattening production systems, using primary data, have not been conducted, which limits our understanding of their dynamics, and the proposal of strategies to improve their productive and reproductive performance. Consequently, this study was carried out to characterize very small, small, medium, and large cattle-fattening farms across 13 cattle producing departments of Colombia from a technical and environmental perspective, to identify the main differences among groups and the proper strategies to improve their productive and environmental indicators.The information used in this study was obtained from the Sustainable Colombian Cattle Ranching (GCS, Spanish initials) and the Livestock Plus (L+) projects. The GCS project conducted surveys in a total of 2011 farms characterized as either cow-calf, cattle fattening, dual-purpose, full cycle, or specialized dairy livestock farms, which were selected based on environmental attributes, the existence of globally important ecosystems, and proximity to protected areas. Livestock farms surveyed were located in the departments (in parenthesis, the number of municipalities surveyed): Atlántico (13), Bolívar (4), Boyacá (12), Caldas (2), Cesar (10), La Guajira (5), Meta (10), Quindío (9), Risaralda (2), Santander (4), Tolima (6), and Valle del Cauca (7) (Figure 1). The criteria used to select these farms included being the property of Colombian owners and covering over 2 ha. A 10-component questionnaire used with each farm covered:(1) general information, (2) herd composition and management, (3) pasture management practices, (4) livestock production and reproduction data, (5) animal health, (6) environmental information, (7) social information, (8) organizational and relationship with the external environment information, (9) incomes from livestock, and (10) financial information. The L+ project conducted a survey among farms located in the Meta Piedmont (municipalities of Cumaral and Restrepo), Meta high plains (Puerto Gaitán and Puerto López), and Cauca dry valley of Patía (El Bordo and Mercaderes) (Figure 1). Surveys were conducted in 607 livestock farms as follows: Piedmont (150), High Plains (147), and dry valley of Patía (310). The questionnaire focused on eight components: (1) general information, (2) administrative information, (3) land-use information, (4) technical assistance, (5) production and trade system characteristics, (6) association membership, (7) financial information, and (8) climate events.From the 2,618 livestock farms surveyed, 275 beef cattle-fattening farms were identified. These were stratified into four categories of livestock producers according to the number of cattle heads (in parenthesis): very small producers (VSP: 1 to 30), small producers (SP: 31 to 50), medium producers (MP: 51 to 250), and large producers (LP: over 251) (Fedegan, 2006). Table 1 shows the numeric and categorical variables included, classified into five components. (1) (1) General Farm Information Total number of animals; total area, ha; grazing area, ha; stocking rate, Animal Units (AU a ) ha -1 ; flat area, %; undulated area, %; hilly area, %; agroforestry crops area, ha; perennial crops area, ha; transitory crops area, ha; forest monoculture area, ha; improved pastures area, ha; pasture area with more than 25 trees per ha, ha; silvopastoral systems, ha; livestock area, ha; number of: buffaloes, horses, mules, pigs, goats, sheep, hens and chickens.Farm facilities (barn, pen, chute, storehouse); machinery and equipment (tractor, chainsaw, manual lawn mower, motor pump, electric fence, electric pump, electronic scale); large species (horses, mules, and buffaloes); medium species (pigs, goats, and sheep); small species (hens and chickens).(2) (2) Herd composition and management Calves per cow; Number of: milking cows, calved cows, dry cows, female calves (0-1 year old), male calves (0-1 year old), growing females, growing males, breeding heifers, fattening steers, and bulls; supply rate (kg yr -1 AU -1 ) of mineral salts, supplements and concentrate feeds.Record keeping (yes, no); mineral salt supplementation (yes, no); plain salt supplementation (yes, no); another kind of supplementation (yes, no); concentrate feeds (yes, no).(3) (3) Pasture management Improved pastures area, ha; fertilized area, ha yr -1 ; fertilizer application rate, kg ha -1 yr -1 ; amendment application rate, kg ha -1 yr -1 Improved pastures (yes, no); rotational grazing (yes, no); division of paddocks (barbed wire, electric fence, mixed); shifting paddocks areas (yes, no); weeding method (manual, mechanical, chemical, mixed); fertilization (yes, no); agricultural lime (yes, no); dolomite lime (yes, no); pasture renewal (yes, no).(4) (4) Production InformationFattening final weight, kg; weight gain at fattening b , kg day -1 ; mortality rate, % Animal weighing method (weighing tape, scale),(5) (5) Environmental Information ---Forest (yes, no); water source (surface water, underground water, piped water); water springs (yes, no); water availability during summer for livestock (yes, no); wastewater treatment system (yes, no); solid waste management (incineration, burial, handled by a third party).a AU: Animal Unit (1 AU being either 1 cow, or 3.3 female and male calves less than 1 year, or 1.7 female and male calves 1 -2 yr, or 1.3 heifers 2-3 yr, or 1.3 steers 1-2 yr, or 0.8 bulls) b Weight gain at fattening (kg day -1 ): was estimated based on the weight at the beginning and the end of the fattening stage, and the fattening timeAssessment of each of the five components was performed by means of Factor Analysis for Mixed Data (FAMD), using the homonymous function of the FactoMineR package in R ( R Core Team, 2016). Mixed data are those in which both quantitative and qualitative variables are recorded on sampling units. FAMD is a multivariate method that simultaneously uses both types of variables as active elements to generate a lower-dimensional space, trough the combination of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) (Pagès, 2004). Quantitative variables were balanced and normalized to Z values, while the qualitative variables were disaggregated in a disjunctive normalized data table. This ensures to balance the influence of both quantitative and qualitative variables on the determination of the dimensions of the lower-dimensional space. This method allowed us to graphically study similarities/dissimilarities between production units (distances) and correlations between continuous variables (Pagès, 2004). Prior to applying FAMD, missing data imputation was carried out, using the algorithm implemented in the imputeFAMD function within the missMDA package (Josse and Husson, 2016).General information and land usage on the farms are presented in Table 2. Figures 2 to 6 include a graphic representation of the FAMDs for each of the five components described in Table 1, as well as: (a) the spatial relationship among the centroids of qualitative variables, with the categories of livestock producers used as a supplementary variable and (b) the projection of continuous variables on the factor plane of the first two dimensions with number of cattle heads as a supplementary variable. Supplementary variables did not participate in the construction of the model. Table S1 of the Supplementary material shows the contingency tables of the variables included in the FAMDs. The first two dimensions explained 41. 70, 24.78, 36.45, 68.7, and 39.37% of the total variability of the observations for the components: General Farm Information (Figure 2), Herd Composition and Management (¡Error! No se encuentra el origen de la referencia.Figure 3), Pasture Management (Figure 4), Production Information (Figure 5), and Environmental Information (Figure 6), respectively. The contribution of each variable (Square Cosine-cos 2 ) to the construction of the first two dimensions in each FAMD analysis is shown in Table S2 of the Supplementary material. Variables with cos 2 values closer to 1 were those which contributed the most to build each dimension and showed a higher correlation with them. There was a separation of the centroid of the different groups (VSP, SP, MP, and LP) in the components: General Farm Information, Herd Composition and Management, Pasture Management, and Production Information. For the component Environmental Information there was no a clear separation of the centroid, which suggests there are no remarkable differences in the implementation of these practices associated to farm size. Plotting the categorical variables within this component showed an alignment of the livestock producer categories over the first dimension of the FAMD representation (Figure 2.a). Such variables as electric fence, electronic scale, tractor, and big animal species were more correlated with the first dimension (Table S2). On the other hand, variables as barn, pen, chute, storehouse, electric pump, chainsaw, manual lawn mower, and motor pump presented the highest correlation with dimension 2 (Table S2). There was a close association between the presence of machinery, equipment and infrastructure, and the categories LP and MP (Figure 2.a). On the contrary, the lack of use of these technologies aligned to the left side of dimension 1 and were associated to VSP and SP producers (Figure 2.a). S3 of the Supplementary material.Numerical area variables -total, with livestock, with improved pastures, with agroforestry crops, with forestry monoculture, with transitory crops, with perennial crops and pasture areas with more than 25 trees per hectare -were positively correlated with the first dimension representing farm size (Table S2). In addition, there was a high correlation between these variables and the number of cattle, i.e., with MP and LP (Figure 2.b). In turn, the variables number of buffaloes and number of chickens were more correlated in a negative way with dimension 2, while the number of pigs and the percentage of flat area were positively correlated to this dimension (Table S2; Figure 2.b).Herd composition, supply rates of supplementary feeds, and productive parameters for VSP, SP, MP and LP farms are shown in Table 3. 1.0 ± 3.0 2.3 ± 4.5 7.5 ± 17.6 37.0 ± 62.0 Fattening Calves (2-3 yr)3.1 ± 4.9 11.6 ± 13.7 31.1 ± 43.5 97.6 ± 119.7 Bulls 0.5 ± 1.5 0.5 ± 0.9 0.8 ± 1.8 2.9 ± 5.1 Supplementary Feeding Farms using concentrate feeds, % 7.0 13.9 10.9 25.0 Supply Rate of Concentrate Feeds, kg year -1 AU -1 * 171.0 ± 146.8 161.8 ± 130.1 394.7 ± 140.6 386.2 ± 185.9 Supply Rate of Supplements, kg year -1 AU -1 * 130.2 ± 174.2 135.8 ± 151.3 144.3 ± 192.8 131.9 ± 132.8 Supply Rate of Mineral Salts, kg year -1 AU -1 * 34.1 ± 9.6 34.9 ± 6.1 34.9 ± 6.7 34.0 ± 2.1 Productive Parameters Live Weight Gain (LWG), kg day -1 0.39 ± 0.1 0.45 ± 0.1 0.46 ± 0.1 0.49 ± 0.1 Mortality Rate, % 6.49 ± 7.8 4.49 ± 5.9 1.45 ± 2.4 0.75 ± 0.4 VSP: very small livestock producers, SP: small livestock producers, MP: medium livestock producers, LP: large livestock producers, AU: Animal units *Average calculated with farms applying this practice Analysis of the categorical variables showed a higher correlation in the use of concentrate feeds with the first dimension. In addition, the supplementation of mineral and plain salt presented the highest correlation with dimension 2 (Table S2). Results suggest that MP and LP farmers are more likely to keep productive records and use a larger proportion of supplementary feeds in the animal diets than VSP and SP farmers (Table S1). S3 of the Supplementary material.Numerical variables as the percentage of dry cows, calved cows, calves, and supply rate of mineral salt presented positive correlation to dimension 1, while the cow:calf ratio and the percentage of fattening calves were negatively correlated with this dimension (Figure 3.b) (Table S2). In turn, the supply rate of concentrate feeds, the percentage of breeding heifers, and the percentage of bulls were positively correlated to dimension 2, while the percentage of growing males showed a negative correlation. Since the variable number of cattle heads did not contribute to a great extent to the first 2 dimensions of the FAMD, herd composition and management practices were not associated to the size of farms.Categorical variables as barbed wire and mixed division of paddocks, rotational grazing, mixed weed control, fertilization, and pasture renovation presented a higher correlation with dimension 1 (Figure 4.a.) (Table S2). On the other hand, improved pastures, division of paddocks with electric fence, and manual and mechanical weed control had a higher correlation with the second dimension (Table S2). In addition, there was an aggregation towards the right side of dimension 1 of the categorical variables chemical fertilization, pasture renovation, amendment application, mixed division of pastures (barbed wire and electrical fence), mixed weed control, and use of electrical fences (Figure 4.a). Variables related to the non-implementation of these practices oriented towards the left side of dimension 1, together with the division of pastures with barbed wire and non-rotational grazing. Livestock-producer categories were aligned along dimension 1, as SP and VSP farmers tend to carry out pasture improvement and conservation practices to a lesser extent. S3 of the Supplementary material.With respect to numerical variables (Figure 4.b), the area with improved pastures and fertilization; and the number of cattle were positively correlated to dimension 1, while the amendment application rate was negatively correlated (Figure 4.b) (Table S2). Thus, in MP and LP farms the area with improved pastures and receiving fertilization was larger.With respect to the categorical variables, the use of a scale showed a high correlation with dimension 1, while the use of a weighing measuring tape and not weighing the animals being correlated with dimension 2 (Table S2). Regarding numerical variables (Figure 5.b), live weight gain (LWG) in the fattening stage, final fattening weight, and the number of cattle heads were positively correlated to the first dimension, while the mortality rate was negatively related to it, indicating better production performance in MP and LP farms compared to VSP and SP farms. S3 of the Supplementary material.In this component, there was no a clear separation of the centroid among the four livestock-producer categories (Figure 6), which suggests there are no patterns in the development and implementation of environmental practices across producer categories. S3 of the Supplementary material.Around 97.1% of farms fell into the VSP, SP, and MP categories (Table 2), which agrees with FEDEGAN (2006) in that a high percentage of livestock farms in the country belong to small and medium producers. Thus, public policies targeted at improving production, environmental, and social conditions of Colombian cattle-fattening farmers should prioritize VSP, SP, and MP, as well as to discriminate the type of market incentives among small-scale farmers and larger and entrepreneurial producers.Livestock farms with a higher number of animals and higher availability of machinery and equipment are more profitable, competitive, and generate greater income (Holmann et al., 2003). In this study, MP and LP were found to have greater availability of machinery and equipment and better facilities and thus, their economical and productivity performance should be better than that of VSP and SP. Similar observations were reported in studies conducted in Venezuela and Mexico, where farms with a higher number of animals had greater use of technology and infrastructure and higher income (Chalate-Molina et al., 2010).The percentages of farm area with flat topography was higher in LP (81.9%) and MP (66.9%) than in SP (48.9%) and VSP (43.0%). In contrast, the percent of farm area with hilly topography (slope over 60%) was higher in VSP (31.7%) and SP (23.5%) than in MP (10.3%) and LP (6.3%). Lands with steep slopes (over 30%) are not suitable for grazing (Ríos-Núñez and Benítez-Jiménez, 2015). Grazing on hillsides generates soil erosion and pasture degradation problems, reducing livestock production due to low forage biomass availability (Braz et al., 2013). This suggests that VSP and SP may be concerned with land degradation issues that can lead to less productivity. In addition, less than 50% of farms in each livestock producer category used improved pastures (Table 2), in spite of the fat that implantation of improved pastures increases forage biomass availability and farm productivity (Chirinda et al., 2019). Hence, ensuring adoption of improved pastures is of high-priority to increase productivity in cattle-fattening farms.In all farms evaluated, the percentage of males in the herd, mainly as fattening steers, ranged between 65% and 71%, and the cow:calf ratio was higher than 4.5, which confirms the orientation of all farms towards beef production. This is similar to what was observed in characterization studies of cattlefattening systems of Mexico and Venezuela (Mosquera, 2005;Velázquez-Avendaño and Perezgrovas-Garza, 2017). Supplementation with mineral salt was carried out in over 71% of farms assessed in each category; the use of supplementary feeds occurred between 51% and 75% of all farms, while the use of concentrate feeds occurred in less than 25% of farms belonging to each category (Table S1). In general, herd structure was similar in all farm categories, with a high percentage of males and a high cow:calf ratio. Feeding practices, however, varied, based on pasture topography and salt uses, and while some farms used supplementary feeds, similarly to what was has been described in Costa Rica (Holguín et al., 2003).Between 70% and 80% of the total farm area in the four livestock producer categories had naturalized, degraded pastures (Table 2), which leads to reduced forage availability and low animal productivity. Both MP and LP farms used better pasture renewal practices and had proportionally larger areas with improved pastures and fertilization, compared to VSP and SP (Table S1). In addition, VSP and SP had land with steeper slopes and a reduced availability of machinery, which limits soil mechanization, the establishment of pastures, and a more intensive land use. Similarly, among Costa Rican producers, it was mostly those of large farms who made substantial investments to renew their pastures (Benavides-Salazar et al., 2013).Pasture renovation practices aim at improving soil physical and chemical conditions by means of improving nutrient, water and air dynamics, thus promoting the growth and vigorous development of forages (Cajas-Girón et al., 2005). Pasture renovation includes practices such as mechanization, fertilization, weed control, planting grass and/or leguminous species, rotational grazing, and, depending on the degree of pasture degradation, the use of different combinations of the above. Therefore, it is clear that by implementing this type of technologies, it is possible to increase forage and beef production, and farm income (Cajas-Girón et al., 2012).The average harvesting age ranged from 28 to 33 months across all four producer categories, which is similar to what is reported for beef production systems in Ecuador (Ríos-Núñez and Benítez-Jiménez, 2015). The average final fattening weight ranged from 430 to 459 kg, which was comparable to those of fattening systems under extensive grazing in Brazil, where final fattening weight ranged from 420 to 500 kg (Dick et al., 2015a(Dick et al., , 2015b;;Ruviaro et al., 2015). Higher daily live weight gain occurred in LP and MP farms (Table 3), which might lead to higher income. In previous characterizations (Velasco-Fuenmayor et al., 2009), it was reported that larger farms showed better productive parameters and higher income than smaller farms. In this study, higher stocking rates, younger harvesting ages, and higher daily live weight gains occurred in LP farms, probably due to better pasture management practices than those of smaller farms.The mortality rates in the study were inversely related to the number of cattle (Figure 5.b). Research shows that conducting record keeping and technical control practices fosters health management of the herd, which reduces the occurrence of diseases and deaths (Díaz-Castillo et al., 2014). On the other hand, grazing in hilly lands can reduce the quality of forage, as well as animal well-being and increase mortality (Ríos-Núñez and Benítez-Jiménez, 2015). As more MP and LP farmers kept records and their farms had a higher percentage of flat farm area (Table 2), this could have contributed to the lower mortality rates observed in these farms. In addition, it must be kept in mind that in small farms, the proportional impact of one dead animal is greater than in a big farm.Over 63% of all farmers reported the presence of forests on their farms (Table S1). It was not determined what percentage of the farm area was allocated to this land-use, information need for the establishment of public policies for the conservation of forest and landscapes. In previous descriptions of Latin American livestock production systems, the forested area was found to be below 10% of the total farm area (Holmann et al., 2003;Ramírez et al., 2012). In tropical Latin America, the expansion of agricultural and cattle herding frontier has been conducted at the expense of forests. In Colombia, for example, 55% of the deforested area was transformed into pastures for livestock production (Cabrera et al., 2011). This suggests that it is important to analyze changes in land use to generate information useful to strategies for forest conservation, expanding forested areas, increasing terrestrial carbon sinks, and reducing national GHG emissions.Both lotic and lentic surface water bodies were the main sources of water in all four categories of the farms evaluated (Table S1). Under extensive grazing conditions, it is common that animals have free access to these water bodies, which could reduce their physical quality, increase their organic matter content, and reduce their concentration of dissolved oxygen (Chará and Murgueitio, 2005), especially, in the cattlefattening systems, where the main source of water is surface water. It is important to conduct assessments at the watershed level, to determine if livestock farming might cause eutrophication problems and to set up measures to mitigate these negative impacts. Creating vegetation corridors along riverbanks and ravines and restricting livestock access to these areas can reduce negative impacts (Chará et al., 2007).The use of wastewater treatment systems in the four farm categories was below 38% (Table S1). The contamination of water bodies from livestock farming operations is associated with nitrogen, phosphorous, and other elements, as well as pathogens and substances, such as pesticides, antibiotics, and heavy metals (Patiño-Murillo and Tobasura-Acuña, 2011). Thus, it is important to promote the adoption of wastewater treatment systems in livestock farms to reduce possible water source eutrophication.Our findings show that, in general, better infrastructure, better machinery and equipment, better pasture management, and better productive parameters and practices were found on larger farms. These factors, we believe, lead to a better economic performance. Developing better cattle management practices and implementing technology on-farm and providing technical assistance to the smaller producers, is necessary to achieve better productive and reproductive parameters in the Colombian beef sector.Further, it is important to assess the environmental performance of farms and identify the main environmental impacts associated with different size livestock production categories, with the purpose of proposing appropriate climate change mitigation measures that effectively contribute to the national goals of reducing GHG emissions.Future policies and government programs aimed at improving productivity and environmental indicators should pay special attention to the smaller producer, which account for the greater number of the Colombian beef farmers.","tokenCount":"4051"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0765965231.json b/data/part_2/0765965231.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3eb423e56ac9db0ec562ce563779c4586896bc4e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0765965231.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7b2703043729754e63d705bf011c7104","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/ccac2dbc-2015-496c-84aa-f3e03d48902f/retrieve","id":"-380760258"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"d73b2203-7bec-4daf-ac3a-597c7cddce4e","pagecount":"20","content":"En las regiones templadas del norte del mundo, las l imitaciones impuestas por la acidez del suelo se eliminan, en parte, mediante el encalamiento para aumentar el pH del suelo hasta llevarlo a un valor casi neutro; sinembargo, esta estrategia no es aplicable a la mayoría de las regiones de oxisoles-ultisoles e inceptisoles derivados de cen izas volcánicas, debido a la distinta naturaleza química de los minerales de las arcillas de baja actividad, lo cual resulta con f recuen cia en reducciones del rendimiento si dichos suelos se encalan hasta su neutralidad (Kamp rath, 1971).Por otra parte , los costos del transport e de la cal son con frecuencia altos en muchas áreas del trópico latinoamericano. De todas manera s , las principales 1 imitaciones impuestas por la acidez del suelo, toxici dad de Al y Mn y deficiencia de P, Ca, Mg, se de ben superar para lograr una agricultura exitosa en estas regiones que cubren un 70% con su elos infértiles en la América tropical.La acidez del suelo generalmente se or1g1na por la acción integrada de los factores de formación del suelo, pero puede ser ag ravada por la percolación continua del agua a través de éste, por el uso prolongado de algunos fertilizantes que dejan residuo ácido, por la de scomposi ción de la materia orgánica y mineral o debido a ciertas reacciones entre el suelo y las raíces de la planta (Kamprath , 1977 ).La acidez del suelo se identifica con ba jo pH ( < 5.5.), altas concentraciones de aluminio y/o セ Q K K K @ + Mn++ y deficiencias de elementos esenciales. El aluminio es el catión predominante en el complejo de intercambio en estos suelos y frecuentemente un factor limitante del crecimiento de muchas especies de plantas (Adams y Lund, 1966).Para atenuar las limitaciones impue stas por la acidez del suelo sin hacer aplicaciones masivas de cal, se proponen algunas estrategias: l.Cal para reducir la saturación de aluminio por debajo de los niveles tóxicos para sistemas agrícolds específicos;2. cal para suministrar Ca y Mg y para estimular su movimiento en el subsuelo;3. uso de especies y variedades tolerantes a las tox icidades de Al yCa l para di sminu i r la saturaci6n de aluminio Hay tres consideraciones 「 セ ウ @ i cas que se deben tener en cuenta a 1 adic i onar cal para disminuir la saturaci6n del aluminio: la determi naci6n de la canti dad de cal que se debe adicionar s i es que es necesari o, l a calidad de la cal que se debe utilizar y la promoc i6n de l efecto residual ma s prol ongado. l . Determinaci6n de la dosis de cal El diagn6stico de l a toxicidad de aluminio en suelos ácidos de América tropical se ha basado en el aluminio intercambiable extraído con KCl 1 N, de sde la década de los sesenta (Mohr, 1960;Cate, 1965;Kamprath, 1970y Salinas, 1978). La recome ndac i6n para el encalamiento se deriva comQnmente de las s i guientes f6rmulas en la que el requerimiento de cal se expresa ya en mili eq uivalentes de calcio o toneladas de CaC03 equ i val entes por hectárea: meq Ca/100 g de suelo = 1.5 x meq Al Inter./100 g ton Ca C03 -eq/ha 1. 65 , 1979), el enfoque comQn ha s i do el de encalar el suelo para lograr una respuesta 6ptima del cul tivo. Este criterio se puede interpretar como el cambiar el suelo para satisfacer la demanda de la planta. Este enfoque es difíci l de aplicar en muchas áreas de América tropi ca l debi do a limitaciones de índole econ6mica. También se de be anotar que Kamprath (1971) indic6 que el encalamiento exces iv o puede tener un efecto en detrimento del crecimiento de las pl antas, como por ejemplo , una deficiencia de zinc inducida po r l a cal en yuca (Spain, 1976).Por consiguiente, es importante determinar la f6rmula más apropiada para convertir el Al intercamb iab l e a la cantidad de cal para sistemas específicos de suel o-cultivos . Cochrane et al., (1980) desarrollaron una f6rmula para determinar la cantidad de cal que se necesita pa ra dismi nu ir el nivel de saturaci6n de aluminio de la capa superior del suel o al ra ngo deseado:Cal requerida (ton CaC)3 -eq/ha) = 1.8 (Al -RAS (Al + Ca + Mg )/lOO , donde RAS es el po rcentaje crítico de saturación de aluminio requerido por un cultivo, una variedad o un sistema agr1cola determinado para superar la toxicidad del aluminio y Al, Ca y Mg son los niveles intercamb iables de estos cationes expresados en meq/100 g. Al compa rarla con datos reales de campo, la capacidad de predicción de esta ecuación es excelente (Coch rane et a 1 , 1980).Una ventaja adicional es que no se requiere un análisis de suelo exhaustivo sino solamente la extracción de aluminio, calcio y magnesio con KCl l N e información sob re l a tolerancia de los cultivos al al uminio en términos del porcentaje de saturación de Al.La adopc ión de dicha fórmula podría conducir a una utilización más efectiva de la ca l y ahorros considerables en las cantidades aplicadas como también en los costos.Ut ilización de materiales de calidad para el encalamiento Además de la forma para determinar las canti dades de cal que se deben apli car, es importante considerar la calidad del material para el encalamiento. Desafortunadamente, en las regiones de Oxiso l es Ultisoles de América tropical, por lo general es poca l a atención que se le presta al tamaño de las part1culas y composición qu1mica de la cal, excepto si es calc1tica o dolomítica (López, 1975 ). Es necesario fomentar estudios de caracterización de depósitos locales de cal tales como los realizados por Guimaraes y Santos (1968) para el estado de Pará en la Amazonia brasilera. El material ideal para encalamiento se debe encontrar en la forma carbonatada y el 100% debe pasar po r un tamiz 10 y e 1 50% por un tamiz 100 . Las fuentes de Ca C03 gruesas rara vez producen las respuestas deseadas en rendimiento del primer cultivo debido a que reaccionan lentamente. Con el fin de compensar esto, los agricultores con frecuencia aplican dosis más altas que las recomendadas, lo cual puede causar problemas por sobreencalamiento en cultivos posteriores (Camargo et al. 1962;Jones y Freitas , 1970).En parte del Amazonas , la mayoría de l as fuentes de cal se explotan para fines de construcción y se produce cal hidratada, Ca(OH)2 . Este material es extremadamente reactivo y sus efectos residuales son muy cortos (NCSU , 1975(NCSU , , 1976)).La alternativa para una mejor utilización de esta cal hidratada es utilizar dosis de aplicación más pequeñas y más frecuentes (Wade , 1978 ). Una mejo r alternativa es solicitarle a los productores de cal que muelan l a caliza al tamaño apropiado y mantenerla así en la forma carbonatada.Como el magnesio es particularmente limitante en Ox isoles y Ultisoles, se prefieren las fuentes de ca l dolomítica. Una relación Ca: Mg de 10:1 en el material para encalamiento generalmente se considera adecuada, aunque existe muy poca evidencia que sostenga esta aseveración.Generalmente se espera que los efectos benéficos del encalamiento de suelos ácidos duren varios años . Sin embargo, los efectos residuales por lo general duran menos en las regiones tropicales que en l as temp l adas debido a la mayor precipitación y a las temperaturas más altas (Lathwe l l , 1979) . La estimaci6n de los efectos residuales del encalamiento de suelos ácidos es un factor primordia l de manejo de los suelos en las regiones údicas de bosques tropicales y ústicas de sabanas . La duraci6n del efecto residual también dependerá del ecosistema . En general, los suelos ácidos en los bosques húmedos tropicales presentarán efectos res idual es más cortos que las regiones de saban a debido a la 1 iberac i6n más rápida del alumin io de lo s comp lejos de mate ria or gán i ca y a la mayo r remoc i 6n de bases por las plantas en sistemas anuales de producci6n de cultivos y quizá s a mayores pérdidas por lixiviaci6n en los bosques húmedos (Villachica, 1978) .El Cuadro 1 resume los resultados de los efectos res iduales de un experimento de encalamiento d largo plazo realizado en Bras il después de siete cultivos consecutivos (cir.co de maíz, uno de sorgo y uno de soya). Después de 6. 5 años, el pH de 1 su e 1 o disminuy6 en todas las dosis de cal probablemente debido a la ac idez residual por los fertilizantes nitrogenados . El nivel de al uminio intercambiable aument6 con el tiempo y los niveles de calcio y magnesio intercambiables disminuyeron. Los niveles de saturaci6n de aluminio aumentaron en aproximadamente un R P セ @ de los valores iniciales para las dosis de O, 1 y 2 ton/ha. Los rendimi entos de grano indi caron un excelente efecto residual , aún obteniendose más del 801 del rendimiento máximo de soya en el séptimo cultivo sucesivo con la dosis de cal de 1 ton/ha. Este resultado probablemente se asocia con la tolerancia al alum inio relati vamente alta de la variedad de soya utilizada.El énfasis tradicional en la fertilizaci6n con NPK en América tropical (con la adici6n reciente del azufre) ha distraído la atenci ón de las difundidas deficiencias de calcio y magnesio en las reg iones de Ox i soles-Ultisoles. En si stemas de altos insumos, las f uentes tradicionales de fertilizantes tales como superfosfato simpl e y ca l dolomítica, frecuentemente sa tisfacen los requerimientos nutricionales de las plantas en lo que respecta a los tres elementos secundarios . En sistemas de bajos insumos con plantas tolerantes a altos niveles de sa turación de aluminio y bajos niveles de f6sforo aprovechable cultivadas en suelos con baja capacidad efectiva de intercambio cati6nico (CEIC) , la correlaci6n de las deficiencias de calcio y magnesio requiere atenci6n directa.Di sponibil idad de calcio y magnesio Los principales factores que afectan la disponibilidad de calcio y magnesio en Oxisoles y Ulti soles incluyen el nivel de estos nutrimentos en la forma intercambiable, la CEIC , los niveles deCuadro l. Efectos residuales de las aplicaciones de cal a un Oxisol de Brasilia en términos de cambios en las propiedades qu1micas de la capa arable y rendimientos relativos en grano a 6 y 66 meses después del encalado. Meses después del encalado. Los rend imientos se refieren al primer cultivo (maíz) y al séptimo cultivo (soya) . Rendimientos máximos fueron 4.0 y 2.1 ton/ha, respectivamente. aluminio intercambiable, la textura del suelo y la mineralogta de las arcillas (Kamprath y Foy, 1971).Ultisoles generalmente son muy bajos. El rango encontrado en sabanas de Brasil, Colombia y Venezuela es del orden de 0.1-0.7 meq Ca/100 g y 0.06-0.4 me t1g/100 g en la capa superior del suelo (López y Cox. 1977;Salinas, 1980;C. Sánchez, 1977). Los niveles de calcio y magnesio en el subsuelo generalmente son menores y a veces no son detectables en subsuelos de Oxisoles (Ritchey et Los niveles de calcio y magnesio intercambiables en Oxisoles y Ultisoles de bosques húmedos son relativamente mayores, especialmente en la capa superior del suelo.Las bajas CEIC de la mayoría de los Oxisoles y Ultisoles proporcionan algunas ventajas y desventajas para el suministro de calcio y magnesio. La primera desventaja es la rápida lixiviación durante períodos de lluvias intensas. Durante dichos períodos pueden ocurrir condiciones anaeróbicas temporales que inhiben la absorción de calcio y magnesio por las raíces. Durante la estación seca, la sequía puede acentuar las deficiencias de calcio y magnesio.La concentración de estos elementos en muestras de tejido de Melinis multiflora y especies nativas de sabana disminuyó significativamente durante la estación seca en Carimagua (Lebdosoekojo, 1977). Las plantas se enfrentan, por lo tanto, a una situación diftcil: probablemente hay una disponibilidad adecuada de calcio y magnesio durante parte de la estación lluviosa; durante ー ・ イ セ ッ 、 ッ ウ @ de intensa lluvia ocurren pérdidas rápidas por lixiviación; y durante la estación seca hay una baja disponibilidad de ambos nutrimentos debido a la sequía (Gualdrón y Spain, 1980). Sin embargo, tanto las plantas nativas como las introducidas en sabanas de Oxisoles parecen exhibir un mejor comportamiento en lo que respecta al calcio y al magnesio lo que se puede inferir de los bajos niveles en el suelo y las relaciones adversas dependientes de la humedad. Rodrtguez (1975) indició que algunas especies pueden presentar mecanismos más eficientes de absorción de calcio y magnesio que los que actualmente se conocen.El aluminio compite con el calcio en la solución del suelo por sitios de intercambio.Por consiguiente, la toxicidad de aluminio se puede disminuir mediante adiciones de calcio {Millaway, 1979). La reducción en el desarrollo radical en condiciones de altas concentraciones de aluminio podría deberse a la deficiencia de calcio, la cual obstaculiza el desarrollo de ratees primarias (Zandstra, 1971).En general, los suelos dominados por arcillas 1:1 requieren un menor nivel de saturación de bases para una disponibilidad adecuada de calcio y magnesio para las plantas que los suelos dominados por arcillas 2:1 (Kirby, 1979).Esta es una ventaja de los Oxisoles y Ultisoles debido a la predomi nancia en ellos de arcillas 1: 1.Es escasa la informaci 6n que ex i ste sobre la dos i s de apl icaci6n de ca l para sati sfacer los requerimientos de fertilizaci6n con calcio y mag nesio.El Cuadro 2 resume las experiencias obteni das en Oxisoles de los Llanos Orientales de Colombia con nivel es de 0. 1 0.4 meq/100 g de ambos elementos .En algunos casos , la respuesta a 0.5 ton/ha de cal dolomítica se debe al magnesio. Spa i n (1979) present6 un informe al respecto para l a fase de establecimiento y mante ni miento de dos l egumi nosas fo rrajeras , Desmod i um ova l ifoli um y Puerari a phaseo l oides , en Carimag ua , Colomb i a. En un experimento a largo plazo reali zado en Brasilia, Bras i l , una res pu esta directa al magnes io t ambién respon di 6 por la mayor parte de la respuesta a la ca l por un primer cu l t ivo de maíz (NCSU, 1974). En Ultisol es de bosques húmedos en Yurimaguas, Perú , en donde no hay disponible cal dolomítica , Villachica (1978) recomend6 dosis de apl icaci 6n de magnes i o del orden de 30 kg Mg / ha / cultivo para superar las deficiencias de mag nesio y prevenir los desba l ances de K/Mg . Estudios real izados recientemente muestran que lastrop icales di f i eren en sus requeri mi entos de l calcio (CIAT, 1981).No impo rtando el fin por el cual se aplique cal (ya sea pa ra disminu ir la saturaci6n de aluminio o para sumin istrar calcio y magnesio, o ambos), sus efectos benéfi cos ocurren princi palmente a la profun di dad a la cual se i nco rpore , pues t o que la ca l no se mue ve en l os suelos en forma considerable . El subs uel o de l a mayo ría de los Ox i soles y Ult i soles es por l o genera l ác ido y con frecuencia presenta una barrera química pa ra el desarrol lo radical , ya sea debido a la toxicidad causada por el alum i nio , a una defi ciencia extrema de calcio o a ambas causas.Es común observar raíces de cultivos anuales confinadas cas i exclusi vamente a la capa arable encalada, con poca pe netraci6n hacia el subsuel o ácido en los Ox i so l es de sabana (González, 1976 ; Ba ndy, 1976) y Ultisoles de bosques húmedos (Bandy, 1977;Valverde y Bandy , 1981) . Dic has plantas sufren por defi cienci a de ag ua cuando ocurren períodos de sequ í a a pesar de tener suf i ciente humedad del suelo almacenada en el subsuelo. Ocurren pérdi das grandes en rendimiento cuando hay sequías \" temporales en etapas 」 イ セ エ ゥ 」 。 ウ @ del crecimiento durante la estaci6n lluviosa en regiones de Ox i soles (Wolf , 1977).Un objetivo primordial de la tecnología de bajos insumas es la de estimul ar el desarrollo radical hacia dichos subsuelos ác idos como una alternativa para los sistemas de riego suplementari o mucho más costosos . Se han di señ ado t res estrategias para supera r este probl ema: 1) aplicaciones profundas de ca l en Oxisoles , 2) esUmulo al mov imiento descenden t e de calcio y magnesio y 3) el uso de cultivares y especies tolerantes . A pesar de que la incorporación de las mismas dosis de cal a los primeros 30 cm de profundidad en vez de los primeros 15 cm no parece ser una tecnología de bajos insumas, de hecho ha aumentado los rendimientos de maíz en varias estaciones en un Oxi sol cerca de Brasil ia, Brasil {NCSU , 1984; Sal inas, 1978;González et al., 1979). Esta práctica es factible en Oxisoles bien granulados que pueden ser labrados a una profundidad de 30 cm . si n mayores aumentos en el consumo de combustible de los tractores. En Ultisoles, con un cambio marcado en su textura dentro de l os primeros 30 cm de profundidad, esta práctica no se puede recomendar puesto que puede crear problemas físicos severos en ese suelo (Sanchez, 1977). Esto indica que no solamente se deben considerar parámetros químicos del suelo al definir la práctica de encalamiento más apropiada, sino que también hay que tener en cuenta los parámetros nsicos del sue lo.Una ventaja primordial de muchos suelos ácidos e infértiles es que sus propiedades f'isicas y químicas permiten el movimiento descendente de ca lcio y magnesio hacia las capas del subsuelo, disminuyendo de esta manera las limitaciones causadas por la acidez del suelo a mayor profundidad y aumentando el desarrollo rad i cal.El mov imiento descendente de calcio y magnesio aplicados en la forma de cal tiene poco signi ficado práctico en otros suel os dominados por arcillas de alta actividad.Como se mencionó con anterioridad , la cal no se mueve considerablemente en los suelos, pero el calcio y el magnesio intercambiables si presentan un movimiento cons iderable en Oxisoles y Ultisoles de baja CICE acompañados por aniones tales como sulfatos o nitratos (Pearson, 1975;Ritchey et al., 1980). La primera evidencia de este fenómeno en América Latina tropical la registró Pearson et al., {1962) después de aplicar aproximadamente 800 kg N/ha/año en la forma de sulfato de amonio a pasturas de gramíneas ferti 1 izada s intensivamente en Puerto Rico.La posible presencia de grandes concentraciones de aniones acompañantes estimuló el movimiento rápido de cationes bási cos hacia el subsuelo.En los últimos tres años se han hecho observaciones si milares en Oxisoles de l as sabanas brasileras y colomb ianas en Ultisoles de la Amazonía peruana, pero a niveles mucho más bajos de cal y de fertilizantes (Salinas , 1978 El pri nci pa 1 componen te de 1 manejo de 1 a acidez de 1 su e 1 o es 1 a selección de variedades productivas que sean tolerantes a la tox icidad del aluminio. Un procedimiento preferido para el efecto es la selección de un gra n núme ro de ecotipos ya sea en so lu ciones de cultivo, en el invernadero, en el campo o una combina ción de los tres. Para lograrlo exitosamente, se requiere de la colaboración cercana entre especiali stas en suelo s y fitomejoradores. Entre las técnicas de selección en soluciones nutritivas de cultivo, la prueba de l a hematoxilina propuesta por Polle et al. (1978) es muy útil.Sin embargo, los resultados de la selección en cultivos nutritivos o en invernaderos se deben va 1 i dar en e 1 campo con un rango representativo de los cultivares seleccionados. Spain et al., (1975), Howeler y Cadavid (1976) , Salinas (1978) y Salinas y Delgadillo (1980) presentan ejemplos de dichas correlaciones. Los estudios adelantados por los últimos dos investigadores de aluminios y fósforo puesto que estos tienden a ocurrir al mismo tiempo (Salinas, 1978).En consecuencia, los cultivares se pueden clasificar por el nivel crítico de saturación de aluminio requerido para alcanzar un 80% del rendimiento máximo. Para una localidad espec1fica, este parámetro se puede expresar en términos del requerimiento de ca l mediante la utilización de la fórmula de Cochrane et al. (1980), in corporando el porcentaje requerido de saturación de aluminio (RAS) .La toxicidad al manganeso es otro factor limitante en ciertos Oxisoles y Ultisoles.Aunque no se conoce su distribución geográfica, se considera que es menos común que la toxicidad por aluminio. La toxicidad por manganeso ocurre en suelos que presentan altos nivel es de manganeso fácilmente reducibles, general mente con contenidos relativamente altos de materia orgánica que pueden causa r condiciones anaeróbicas temporales. El manganeso es muy soluble a valores de pH menores que 5.5 particularmente en condiciones anaeróbicas, en lds que el Mn 4+ se reduce a Mn2+.En Oxisoles y Ult i soles bien drenados pueden ocurrir condiciones anaeróbicas temporales deb i do a la descomposición rclpida de materia orgclnica o a inundaciones temporales durante períodos de lluvia fuerte.Algunos ejemplos de dichos suelos incluyen el suelo arci l loso de Co t o, un Tropeptic Eutrorthox de Puerto Rico (Pearson, 1975) y algunos suelos Orthoxic Palehumult en la estación de CIAT Quil i chao en Colomb ia. A diferencia de la toxicidad de alumi nio, la toxicidad de manganeso puede ocurrir a niveles de pH tan altos como 6.0 (Simar et al., 1974). Los niveles de cal comú nmente requeridos para aumentar el pH de los Oxisoles y Ultisoles tóxicos セ ョ @ manganeso a un nivel de aproximadamente 6, son por lo general muy altos. Por ejemplo, para aumentar el pH de 4.6 a 6.0 en el Ultisol de la estación de CIAT-Qu ilichao, es necesario aplicar Ca C03 puro a razón de 20 ton/ha (CIAT, 1978).En consecuencia, la principal estrategia es la de seleccionar variedades tolerantes . A diferencia de la toxicidad de aluminio, los síntomas de la toxicidad de manganeso, ocurren en las hojas puesto que este elemento tiende a acumularse en las partes aéreas, en tanto que el exceso de alum ini o se acumula en las raíces (Foy, 1976 ) . Los síntomas de toxicidad de manganeso incluyen cl orosis marginal, deficiencia de hierro induc ida , malformación de las hojas jóvenes y manc has l ocal izadas en los sitios en donde se acumula manganeso (Vlami s y Williams, 1973;Foy, 1976). En términos generales , aparentemente las leguminosas son más susceptibles a la toxicidad del manganeso que las gram1nea s (Lohnis , 1951 ; Hew i t, 1963). Los ci ent1 f i cos australianos han encontrado diferencias importantes en la tolerancia al exceso de manganeso entre las principales espec i es de legum inosas forrajeras.A pesar de que cerca del 70% de la extensión de t i erra de las regiones de Oxiso les y Ultisoles de América tropical poseen limitaciones severas por l a acidez del sue l o, no es necesario encalar estos suel os hasta llevarlos a su nivel neutro o i ncluso a un pH de 5.5 con el fin de obtener una produ cc1ón de culti vos y pastos sostenida.Los estimativos de las necesidades de producción de alimentos en el mundo a largo pl azo no requieren de altas dosi s de apli cación de cal pa ra las 750 millones de hectáreas de América tropical con limitaciones severas por la toxicidad de aluminio, deficiencia de calcio y deficiencia del magnes i o. A su vez, so n engañosas las aseverac i ones que indican que una producción agrícola sosteni da es posible sin el encalamiento en la mayoría de los Ox isoles y Ultisoles. La existencia de variedades de especies forrajeras y de cultivos muy to lerantes al aluminio puede el imina r la ne cesi dad de disminuir el nivel de saturación de al uminio del suelo med i ante el encalamiento, pero en la mayoría de los casos las plantas requieren de fertilización con calcio y magnesio . Esto se puede lograr mediante aplicaci ones de cal en dos i s pequeñas o med i ante el uso de fe r t ili zantes que contengan suficientes canti dades de estos dos nutrimentos esenciales . Las ap l icaciones de cal en pequeñas dosis son probablemente menos costosas por un idad de nutrimento que los ferti l izantes de calcio y magnesio.Un atributo muy positivo de muchos Oxisoles y Ult i soles de Améri ca tropical es la relativa facilidad de movimiento del calcio y magnes io en el subsuelo. Es pos ible aprovechar lo qu e normalmente se cons ideraría como un factor l i mita nte del suelo: su baja CICE. Junto con una estructura del sue l o favorable y suficiente lluvia , una baja CICE favorece la disminución gradual de las propiedades químicas del subsue lo. Esto a su vez fa vorece un desarrollo radical más profundo y menos oportunidad de que ocurra stress por la sequía. (Sá nchez y Sa li nas, 1973).La asociación de cultivos en el trópico tiene una historia ca s i tan larga como l a historia de la agricultura. Los s istemas complejos del campesino actual en América tienen sus イ 。 セ 」 ・ ウ @ sin duda en las culturas ind í genas y sus cultivos de subsistencia . Su importancia se preserva en numerosas zonas de minifundio en América Central y Amér i ca del Sur, en especial a todo lo largo de la cordillera andina , en los valles, altiplanos y laderas.La investigación agr1cola en el trópico ha ignorado por largo tiempo esta realidad, enfocAndose hacia el desarroll o de una tecnolog1a cuyo objetivo es una producción mAs eficiente de unicultivos. En este sentido se ha llegado a aumentar el potenc i al de rendimiento de muchos cultivos a través de nuevas prActi cas culturales, uso de fertilizantes , fungicidas, insecticidas y herbicidas y 。 ウ セ @ mi smo medi ante el mejoramiento genético , con la obtención de nueva s variedades de rendimiento super ior para condiciones de alta tecnolog1a .Sin embargo, muchos de los cultivos al i menticios en el trópico se siguen produciendo en ー ・ ア オ ・ セ 。 ウ @ fincas con sus sistemas de 」 オ ャ エ セ カ ッ @ tradicionales, sistemas comp lejos con dos o mAs cultivos en el mismo l ote, bajas densidades, labores manuales con mano de obra fam il iar y sin uso de insumos ア オ セ ュ ゥ 」 ッ ウ @ y variedades regionales de cultivo tradicional .La importancia de estos sistemas de producc i ón ha llevado a la necesidad de orientar la investigación hacia el entendimiento de los sistemas con el objeto de contribuir con una nueva tecnolog1a para el mejoramiento de las condiciones de vida y productividad del campesino.La asociación de cultivos puede definirse como un sistema en el cual do s o m ás especies cu ltivadas se siembran con suficiente proximidad en el espacio para resultar en una competencia interespec1fica para un recurso limitante o potencialmente limitante (Ha rt, 1975a). Esta definición impl ica que cada cu ltivo estará afectado por competencia con las otras especies componentes de l sistema . Como consecuencia , el rendimiento de una especie serA menor cuando es asociada que en unicu l tivo.La característica mas notable del s i stema es que cualquier variación en un factor que influya en el crecimiento y desarrollo de las plantas, resultarA en una ventaja selectiva de uno de l os cul tivos sobre el otro. Esta in teracción dinámica entre los cultivos asociados trae aparejada una mayor estabilidad de producción del s i stema como un conj unto, con un menor riesgo de pérdida total por cualquier• factor de stress ヲ セ ウ ゥ 」 ッ @ o enfermedad de una de las especies. Cuando el rend imiento de un cultivo di sminuye , aumenta el del otro o los otros.Al definirse esta interacción cor11o un atributo propio del sistema, se evidencia la necesidad de analizar y eval uar l os s i stemas de asociación de cultivos que se encuentran en la rea lidad entre las forma s tradiciona les de 1 os campesinos en América, como un conjunto integrado por dos o más cultivos, con una mayor estabi lidad de producción y menor riesgo a través ce los años que l os unicultivos por separado. La mayor estabilidad del ecosistema se explica 」 ッ ョ セ @ un freno a la multi plicación de los patógenos e insectos por la presenci a de la otra especie , f r ente a las al t as densidades de siembra del unicultivo (Rappaport , 1971). Lépiz (1974) ha observado en Méx i co, en varios años de ensayos de asociación ma1z -frijol, mayor sani dad del frijol asociado en cuanto a plagas y enfermedades respecto a los unicultivos. También se produce un mejor aprovechamiento de las variaciones del medio ambiente, ventaja que tiene una mezcla de genotipos en un ambiente vari able, por ejemplo en un factor como distribución de las lluvias. La eficiencia fotosintética del ecosistema asoc i ado es mayor que en los unicultivos, debido al mayor aprovechamiento de l a l uz en estr atos fo l iares di ferentes o más amp li os. El sombreado de los cu l tivos fa vo rece así mismo una mayor competencia del sistema con las ma l ezas.Respecto a la interacción y estabilidad en la asociación de maíz-frijol, comenta Lépiz: \"en algunos ensayos los rendimientos de frijol han sido sobr esalientes, en algunos otros el maíz no ha l ogrado una buena producción y en otros más, tanto el fri jol como el maíz han producido buena cosecha ; de acuerdo principalmente a la disponibi l idad de humedad en un momento dado\".En cuanto a l a asoc i ación de cultivos como a l ternativa para e l agricultor se evidenc i a en varios t r abajos (Francis, Sanders, 1979;Hart, 1975b;Tobón et al, 1975, Lépiz, 1974) que el beneficio económico de las asoci aci ones en l a mayoría de los casos es significativamente más alto que el de los unicultivos, siendo una buena alternativa para el uso de los recursos del campesino en las zonas estudiadas. \"La ganancia combinada de ambos cul tivos en la asociaci ón supera sistemáticamente a la ganancia que se ob ti ene a l sembrar fri jol o ma í z solos (Lépiz, 1974). \"Los sistemas de a lte r nati vas probados de unicultivos de maíz y frijol con variedades mejo r adas , con mayor fert il i zaci ón y mayores densi dades de población no f ueron superior es en ingresos netos a los sistemas agr1colas tradi cionales\" ( r elevo papa-ma1z -fri jol) (Tobón , 1975).La disminución del riesgo en el sistema de asociación, junto al mayor beneficio económico, demuestran la racionalidad de estos sistemas agrícolas tradi c i onales y su pe r sistencia en los distintos países del área. Como contraparte, los unicultivos, sistemas de siembra de una sola va ri edad a densidades a 1 tas de pob 1 aci ón, en extensiones y con uso de maq ui na ri as , tiene una productividad e l evada y se la considera como una evo lución de l a agricultura . Si n embargo, t ambién se dice que es el ecosistema más delicado e i nestable que jamás haya aparecido en la tierra .Como conclusión de este análisis cabe mencionar del trabajo de Tobón en Colombia , analizando los sistemas complejos de Antioquia, \"Sistemas agd co l as como l os que los agricultores del Oriente de Antioquia han i deado existen en muchas reg i ones de agricultura tradicionalmer,';P E>n América Latina. Por diferentes razones, los agrónomos latinoameri canos hemos aceptado a priori la ineficiencia de estos sistemas agdcolas, f r ente a l os prometedores avances que ofr ece la llamada revol uc i ón verde. El hecho en s í de que los sistemas agrícolas tradicionales hayan subsi stido pese a l a opinión adversa de l os agrónomos puede tomarse como una evidencia de que aq uellos ofrecen ventajas para los agriculto res t r adicionales. Si se acepta esta posición, el reto para e l fitomejorador y el agró nomo es desarrollar nuevas variedades y tecnologtas apropiadas para los ー ・ ア オ ・ セ ッ ウ @ agricultores que representen un verdadero beneficio para ellos.Se hace mención de algunas estimaciones estadtsticas como ejemplos especHi cos de la importancia de la asociación de cu l tivos en el mundo (A.S . A ., 1976;Gutiérrez, et al . 1975).El 98% de la producción de caupí, principal leguminosa en Africa, se encuentra asociada con otros cultivos al imenticios.El 83% del terreno cultivable en la zona norte de Nigeria se ded i ca a cultivos múltiples.El 90% del cultivo de fri jol en Co l ombia se encuentra en asociación con maíz, papa y otros cu lti vos .El 73% de la producción de frijol en Guatemala se encuentra en asociación, principalmente con ma1z.El 80% de frijol en Brasil se encuentra sembrado en asociación con otros cultiv os, principalmente ma1z. El 58% del fri jol en México corresponde a siembras asociadas con matz .El 60% del ma1z y un 70-80% de frijol en el trópico latinoamericano se encuentran asociados con otros cultivos . Terminolog1a de los sistemas de cultivos asociados Durante el simposio sobre cu ltivos múltiples celebrado en Knoxv ill e (A. S.A., 1976), se acordó una serie de términos para describir los varios sistemas de cultivos mú l tiples. Con ello se bus ca normalizar el uso de dichos términos para evitar problemas de comun i cación entre l os investigadores. l . Culti vos mú lti ples (Multiple Cropping): La intensificación de la agricultura en tiempo y espacio por medio de la siembra de dos o más cultivos en el mismo terreno, durante el mismo ai10 . Dentro de este concepto hay una serie de alternativas . Cu l tivos de relevo . Siembra del segundo cultivo antes de la cosecha pero después de la floración del primero.Unicultivo (Sole Cropping):La siembra de una sola variedad a su densidad normal.Monocultivo: La siembra repetida del mismo unicultivo en el mismo terreno .La siembra cíclica de una serie de cultivos, que puede incluir un período de descanso, en el mismo terreno a través de varios anos.La secuencia anual y colocación f1sica de los cultivos, o de los cultivos y el barbecho, en determinado campo .Los patrones de cultivos utilizados en una finca y sus interacciones con recursos u otras actividades en la finca, as í como la tecnolog1a, disponible que determi na su composición.Según esta terminología, al hablar de cultivos múltiples se trata de una escala de posibilidades agronómicas, desde un extremo de cultivos en secuencia, en serie, traslape parcial o relevo de cultivos hasta el otro ex tremo de una siembra s imultánea de cultivos . En la realidad se presentan distintas situaciones para cada caso, como por ejemplo en asociación directa o siembra simultánea, sistema que puede ser intensivo, con altas densidades de cada cultivo y una producción relativamente alta; o muy tradicional , con varios cultivos, sin organización, a densidades bajas, sin uso tan intensivo del terreno o de otros recursos disponibles.A continuación se ejemplifican algunos sistemas de asociación de frijol principalmente con ma1z, existentes en pa1ses de América Latina.l. Cultivos mixtos frijol trepador-maíz:Este s i stema se encuentra en países como México, Guatemala, Co lombia, Ecuador y Perú. Su producción se concentra en los valles y","tokenCount":"6003"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0802794746.json b/data/part_2/0802794746.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..16b96ac382492ee4ee72258a033cd50073042f72 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0802794746.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4515c2882047f78053212cdbd21bcf08","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/94631f77-4b4c-4ad1-b152-db2e6fa34783/retrieve","id":"-1037378800"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"f99eb622-5df2-407a-9f51-3f6396b00b90","pagecount":"14","content":"The mainstay of the economy of North East States of India is agriculture and allied activities, which is currently exhibiting trends of decreased sustainability. Agriculture is practiced in mixed crop-livestock system but with low inputs and low outputs. Slash and burn agriculture is still predominantly practiced in almost all the states on steep slopes with a reduced fallow cycle of 2-3 years against 10-15 years in the past.Livestock production is a crucial component of the livelihoods of most rural families in the states of NE India, especially pigs and poultry -25% of all pigs in India are in the NE States, 80% of tribal families keep a few pigs (generally 2-3) and it is estimated that 50% of all pork consumed in India is consumed in the North East (ICAR 2007). Livestock not only provides products for household consumption, but also serves as a means of generating income, accumulating capital, diversifying risk, meeting socio-cultural need. Consumption of milk is not common among tribal people and therefore except in Assam and some pockets of other NE states, cattle rearing is not widely prevalent. In higher altitude areas such as in Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh, Yak and Mithun are also important livestock species. Recent studies have indicted that there is a growing demand for livestock products within the region. This is especially true for pork: a recent study by ILRI and local partners (Deka at al., 2007) estimated that the demand for pork in surveyed districts of Nagaland has increased by 15-25% over the past 7 years. Nagaland alone imports about 10,000 pigs from outside the state in every month. In respect of eggs, trade source indicates that about 10 million eggs are being procured from outside the region every month. In the case of milk products about 2500 tonnes are imported into the region each month. This suggests that there are significant opportunities for improving the livelihoods of large numbers of the most disadvantaged communities in the region for whom livestock rearing is an integral part of their household farming activity. However there are a number of constraints to the improvement of livestock production, which will be the focus of this sub-project.The National Agricultural Innovation Project is funding a project led by ICAR NEH Regional Complex entitled 'Livelihood Improvement and Empowerment of Rural Poor through Sustainable Farming Systems in North East India' The project will focus on seven of the most disadvantaged districts in NE India (excluding Assam). ILRI will participate only in one target district, Mon District of Nagaland. NAIP has allocated Rs 3,674,000 (approx US $91,850) over 5 years (2007-08 to 2011-12) to ILRI to cover in-country research costs and the salary of one Research Assistant. IFAD has agreed to provide $110,000 over the first three years of the project to fund international staff costs, international travel and some local staff costs plus some operating costs to allow the full participation of ILRI. 1. Assess the contribution of livestock to the livelihoods of the target communities. 2. Assess the market for livestock products and opportunities for improving marketing and market efficiency. 3. Evaluate, test and promote viable and sustainable options for improved feeding, breeding and management practices. 4. Build capacity among stakeholders in participatory approaches to research on livestock-based farming systems for livelihood security. 5. Ensure suitable institutional and policy measures are developed for promoting sustainability of improved practicesThe project is being implemented in Lompongsheanghah and Longwa villages of Mon district of Nagaland. Lompongsheanghah village is located about 30 km from Assam Nagaland border and 10 km away from the district headquarters (Mon town) while Longwa village is located about 40 km from Mon Town on both side of the border Indo-Myanman. The connectivity to Longpongsheanghah village is poor because of poor road condition.Earlier Longwa was almost inaccessible by road for 5-6 months in year because of very poor road conditions, however the road has it improved significantly in the last year.There are about 115 households in Longpongsheanghah village and about 536 households in Longwa village. Economically, the villagers are very poor and they can hardly meet two square meals round the year -the magnitude of poverty is more in Longwa village than Longpongsheanghah village. The people are cash starved, and yearly cash income comes to not more than Rs.15,000/-in Longpongsheanghah village and Rs.6000/-in Longwa villge out of which about 20-25% is contributed by livestock. The major sources of cash income are selling of fire wood, vegetables, orange, bamboo, pigs, poultry, traditional crafts, handloom products, minor business/ services and daily wage earning.In both the villages almost all the households have cultivable land and almost all of them depend on jhuming(shifting cultivation). Maize, colocacia, paddy (rice) and millets are the major crop. Some of them also grow vegetables. Their own agricultural produce is usually not even enough to meet the household requirement for 6 months. Many of the villagers depend on colocacia, tapioca and jungle food/ leaves as staples for certain periods of the year. Amongst the livestock, pigs (about 70% households rear pigs) and poultry (about 40% in 15% in Longwa) are the most notable, while cattle, goat and Mithun (about 20% in Longpongsheanghah and 15% in Longwa) are reared by only a small section of households. About 90% of households rear one or more species of livestock in Longpongsheanghah village and about 75% in Longwa village. Cows and goats are not very important as milk and chevon are not the choice of food for the local people. Mithun plays an important role in the household economy of those who own them as selling a Mithun can raise Rs.20,000/-to Rs.25,000/-each. But the opportunity for technical intervention in Mithun production is limited by its semi-wild nature of rearing. All the livestock in the villages are low productive indigenous breed or their crosses and herd size is very small ranging from 1-5. Livestock are reared mainly as a part of household tradition/culture and for home consumption or occasional selling, proper market orientation is not there. Rearing of pigs for breeding (boar and sows) is not a popular practice in the village. Feed is generally gathered from the field and it is mostly constituted of jungle forages, colocacia, tapioca and kitchen waste. Cultivation of food-feed crops (including sweet potato) in the homestead for feeding pigs is not practiced. Except wheat bran, other feed ingredients are not available in the villages.There are absolutely no veterinary services. Producers have the traditional skill for management of indigenous pigs but they are not well versed with management of cross-bred pigs. They do not have adequate knowledge and confidence about breeding (care and management of pigs during pregnancy and lactation), feeding (cultivation of new feed crops) and management of cross-bred pigs. There are no linkages for supply of farm inputs and selling of outputs.Prior to NAIP, no organisation made any concerted effort to build the capacity of the villagers or support the villagers on management of improved livestock for income and employment generation. Out of all the livestock species, villagers identified pigs as the most preferred and important livestock species for livelihood improvement. The key challenges for improved pig production were (a) existing pigs were of indigenous breed which took almost 4-5 years to achieve the market weight (80-100 kg), (b) feeding practice was completely unscientific -mainly jungle forage based, (c) little or no access to improved farm inputs (piglet, feed) and veterinary services, (d) the housing system was unhygienic, (e) inadequate knowledge and confidence for rearing of pigs for breeding purpose-pigs ate reared mainly for fattening purpose, and (f) little or no access to markets.For improving livelihoods through livestock development (especially pigs) all the above constraints need to be strategically addressed keeping in view the local resource constraints (mainly feed and financial), demographic conditions, geo-political situation and market opportunities.It was initially planned to undertake a survey of market opportunities early in the project, but as explained in last year's report this was delayed at the request of local partners to concentrate initially on capacity building activities. It was decided to implement the market survey in 2009 but in view of the need to implement a similar survey in other districts of Nagaland in 2010 as part of another project it was decide to conduct the survey in Mon district at the same time as that in other district to give a state-wide view.Howeve to start to create market linkages between with the villagers and pig traders/ pork retailers, piglet traders, feed suppliers, medicine suppliers, veterinary departments and banks, a buyers-sellers meet was organized in both the project villages in January 2010 in association with ICAR and SASARD in. This gave a platform for information sharing and built linkages between the villagers and service providers. There was lot of open discussion among the participants about their business and terms and conditions and the possibility of helping each other.Because the capacity building is an integral part of the testing and promoption of improved practicies, these two objectives are reported together.Initially, ILRI staff visited some of the villages in Assam and Nagaland to identify local best practices and thereafter they visited the project villages and had thorough consultation with the villagers to identify the key interventions. It was discuss and decided to help only 3 SHGs (two men and one women SHG) in Longpongsheanghah village and 2 SHGs (both women SHGs) in Longwa village on pig production (only those SHGs which were not supported by partner institutes). The key areas of interventions were identified as (a) distribution of good breed of pigs under Hands on Gift (HoG) scheme, (b) development of community-based veterinary service delivery system, (c) support for cultivation of food-feed crops, (d) capacity building on improved pig management (especially for breeding purposes) and (f) develop linkages with all relevant stakeholders. Thereafter, a work plan was prepared, shared and agreed with the partner institutes and permission taken from them to work with the SHGs already promoted by them.As a first step of actual intervention in the project villages, the ILRI workplan was explained to the members of the target SHGs. Villagers were asked to identify two young educated youths from each project village who could service the community as Veterinary First Aid Practitioners. Accordingly, the villagers organized a general meeting and came up with two suggested names from each village. The members of each self help group were asked to identify the six most successful pig producers within the group who would receive better quality piglets supplied by ILRI under HoG scheme. They were also asked to select the down-line beneficiaries (2 or 3 in number) under each first line beneficiary, who would receive piglets as a gift at the end of production cycle from the first line beneficiaries. All the SHGs organized their own group meeting (where ILRI's RA was invited observer) and identified the first, second and third line beneficiaries and submitted the list of beneficiaries to ILRI. The key objective of this initiative was to use the best local people to take the lead in the initiative and have put a peer pressure within the group for the initiative to be successful.Before distributing the piglets to the beneficiaries, training on \"Smallholder Pig Management\" was designed (after assessment of training need) and organized in June 2009 in both the project villages, using a local veterinarian and successful pig producers as resource persons. Another, refresher training was organized in the project villages in August 2009 on the same topic. The training was also accompanied by exposure visits to some of the successful pig producers. AfterTraining of paravets building the capacity of the target beneficiaries, piglet distribution and other assistance programmes were started.All the identified beneficiaries were provided with a good quality piglet procured from College of Veterinary Science, Khanapara. Along with the piglets, they were given 10-15 kgs of concentrate feed as initial support. All piglets were vaccinated against Swine Fever before transporting from Khanapara. Community First Aid practitioner offered deworming drugs, mineral and vitamin mixture to the piglets in due course of time. Unfortunately, some mortality was recorded in the piglets procured from Khanapara which were thereafter replaced by locally sourced best quality pigs from Mon town, selected by the beneficiaries. Currently, 3 SHGs (20 beneficiaries) in Longpongsheanghah village and 2 SHGs (14 beneficiaries) in Longwa village are rearing improved pigs.For better feeding of pigs, it was suggested to all the first line beneficiaries that they cultivate food-feed crops (sweet potato, colocacia, tapioca and maize) in the backyard. In this connection, first line beneficiaries were also provided with planting materials of an improved variety of sweet potato supplyed by the International Potato Centre (CIP), Bhubneswar. Before distributing the planting materials to the beneficiaries, it was multiplied in SASARD campus, Nagaland. Locally available other best quality food-feed crops were suggested. Other than supplying the sweet potato planting materials, no financial assistance (in any form) was given to the beneficiaries. ILRI's staff worked closely with the community and motivated the people to cultivate food-feed crops for their betterment and offered technical guidance whenever required. It is worth mentioning here that out of 20 first line beneficiaries in Longpongsheanghah village 18 cultivated the food-feed crops and in Longwa village out of 14 beneficiaries, 10 cultivated the crops.The buyers-sellers meet in LongwaTo stimulate growth and to reduce the incidence of diseases, better housing is required. To improve the housing conditions, all the beneficiaries were suggested and motivated to construct a larger pig sty to improve the comfort of the pigs. Also, they were suggested to construct the sty in their backyard especially in a dry area having plenty of sunlight and a proper drainage system for collection of manure. Other than suggestions and guidance no financial assistance was given to them. Surprisingly, out of 20 beneficiaries in Longpongsheanghah village, 18 constructed or renovated the sty and in Longwa village out of 14 beneficiaries, 8 constructed or renovated the pig sty with locally available materials using their own labour.To reduce the incidence and spread of diseases explained to them about the use of these disinfectants in cleaning pig sty, farm utensils and surroundings. Thereafter, SHG group members and ILRI's trained paravets collectively cleaned stys of all the beneficiaries and distributed some disinfectants for further cleaning. Out 20 beneficiaries in Longpongsheanghah village, 18 are adopting the clean and hygienece measures and in Longwa village out 14 beneficiaries, 8 are adopting the measures.A summary of the key capacity building and improved practices is given in As a part of the policy advocacy strategy, ILRI is working closely with the Minister, Commissioner & Secretary and other top officials of Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Deptartment, Nagaland. Linked to other ILRI projects in Nagaland, ILRI is trying to influence policy makers to design livestock development programmes to meet the need and expectation of poor livestock keepers keeping in view the resource constraints and poor accessibility to inputs and services. One of the key areas of policy advocacy strategy is to develop local resource based feeding systems for pigs and development/ procurement of good quality swine fever vaccine.Since ILRI has a very small role in the whole NAIP project from the standpoint of activities The HoG scheme has the advantage that it puts peer pressure on the members to work efficiently for sustenance of the activities. Supplying good quality piglets to the villagers requires access to better feed resources and this is a challenge, especially in Longwa, where villages are too poor to feed the pigs with any purchased inputs (even small quantity). Also they do not have sufficient other feed resources to manage (including kitchen waste) the pig, so pigs may not grow as quickly as desired. It remains to be seen how sustainable this is. Efficient market linkages will be key to sustainability.Food-feed crops are a good option for feeding of pigs in these difficult areas, but many of the producers do not have sufficient land for cultivation. So increasing the herd size of pig should not be considered until and unless the area under cultivation is increased.Capacity building programmes are crucial for incremental changes in the production system over a period of time and may bring long term impact on livelihoods. The impact is likely to be more sustainable than delivering inputs for a short time.The community-based veterinary service delivery system is perhaps the only way out for providing some kind of veterinary services to the producers, but producers are reluctant to pay the First Aid practitioner for their services. If the community members do not pay the FA practitioners, sustainability of their services may be at stake. ILRI expects that gradually the producers will be ready to pay for their services once the benefits are seen and FA practitioners would be the key contact person in the villages as far as pig production is concerned. ILRI is also trying to build linkages between the FA practitioners and other stakeholders so that they can offer input supply and output marketing services in order to generate more income. As it's exit strategy ILRI would like to build them as the key resource persons in the village who will carry forward the initiatives after completion of the project.In order to create market linkages, ILRI is currently implementing a market study in Mon to assist in the development of better market linkages.As part of synergies, ILRI is continuously working with a number of other organizations (local, national and international) to meet the requirement of the villagers and will continue to do so in order to make the intervention sustainable, up-scalable and out-scalable with their support.Creating linkages is one of the priority area for up-scaling the activities Since the interventions are quite recent the impact in terms of productivity and profitability of improved pig keeping cannot yet be assessed. Nevertheless, the process and approach adopted by ILRI seems useful and fruitful in difficult areas like Mon and perhaps it can be replicated in other areas as well. In particular ILRI is very encouraged with the outcome of the capacity building programmes which motivated the villagers to revisit their production practices and adopt new improved practices without getting any financial help from the project. Initially, when ILRI approached the villagers for availing training, they were asking for a day wage for attending the training and they used to leave the training after the lunch. But now, they are more eager to learn and they attend the full training programmes, even stopping going to jhoom fields or attending the day wage programme under National Rural Employment Guarantee Program (NREGA). Learning about the interventions of ILRI in the project villages, three other villages have approached ILRI to help them out in improving their production system. Some of them are not expecting any monetary help from ILRI but requested training and guidance for improving their pig production system. Following a request made by the Village Development Council of Tuimai village (a neighbouring village to Longpongsheanghah) ILRI started inviting 2-3 representatives from the village to ILRI's capacity building programmes.Based on ILRI's experience in Mon, ILRI has taken an initiative to develop three training manuals i.e. (a) smallholder pig management, (b) veterinary first aid and (c) hygienic slaughter and selling of pork for improving the efficiency of productivity of pig through incremental production changes using its own financial resources. The draft training manuals are almost ready and will be shared with all the veterinary departments in NE India. Thereafter they will be printed and distributed amongst all the institutions/ organizations involved in pig production.A number of actions have been taken to ensure community participation, promote transparency and build ownership. These include: All the activities in the project area have been planned in consultation with the community;  Beneficiaries have been selected by the community, not by ILRI;  Except some minor inputs and technical guidance , other investments in terms of labour and resourcing coming from beneficiaries voluntarily;  ILRI has built the capacity of the community members to carry on improved practices;  Trying to create linkages with other stakeholders for input supply, output marketing & follow up support; ","tokenCount":"3336"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0815629127.json b/data/part_2/0815629127.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e2189155ce96579754d2e58f85f80e261918a143 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0815629127.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7df6a22de795bad5bf0f0e9802baa4e2","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/55d8c21b-9cc0-48c5-b875-776e37b7ef17/retrieve","id":"188703601"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"e41c3c0f-ccdf-4c26-9912-e51899f0ed01","pagecount":"168","content":"The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory or city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Some illustrations or graphics appearing in this publication may have been adapted from content published by third parties. This may have been done to illustrate and communicate the authors' own interpretations of the key messages emerging from illustrations or graphics produced by third parties. In such cases, material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of United Nations Environment Programme concerning the source materials used as a basis for such graphics or illustrations.Mention of a commercial company or product in this document does not imply endorsement by the United Nations Environment Programme or the authors. The use of information from this document for publicity or advertising is not permitted. Trademark names and symbols are used in an editorial fashion with no intention on infringement of trademark or copyright laws.The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Environment Programme. We regret any errors or omissions that may have been unwittingly made.This publication was produced with the financial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the United Nations Environment Programme and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union.Humanity is waging war on nature. This is senseless and suicidal. The consequences of our recklessness are already apparent in human suffering, towering economic losses and the accelerating erosion of life on Earth.Ending our war does not mean surrendering hard-won development gains. Nor does it cancel the rightful aspiration of poorer nations and people to enjoy better living standards. On the contrary, making peace with nature, securing its health and building on the critical and undervalued benefits that it provides are key to a prosperous and sustainable future for all.The urgent need to transform our relationship with nature risks being overlooked amid the huge suffering inflicted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Saving precious lives and livelihoods is our top priority. But by exposing humanity's vulnerability, the pandemic can also help make 2021 a turning point towards a more sustainable and inclusive world.This report provides the bedrock for hope. By bringing together the latest scientific evidence showing the impacts and threats of the climate emergency, the biodiversity crisis and the pollution that kills millions of people every year, it makes clear that our war on nature has left the planet broken. But it also guides us to a safer place by providing a peace plan and a post-war rebuilding programme. By transforming how we view nature, we can recognize its true value. By reflecting this value in policies, plans and economic systems, we can channel investments into activities that restore nature and are rewarded for it. By recognizing nature as an indispensable ally, we can unleash human ingenuity in the service of sustainability and secure our own health and well-being alongside that of the planet.Making peace with nature is the defining task of the coming decades. We must seize the opportunity presented by the COVID-19 crisis to accelerate change. This year, several major international conferences, including on climate change, biodiversity and desertification, provide an opportunity to increase ambition and action on recovering better and addressing climate disruption. Our central objective is to build a global coalition for carbon neutrality. If adopted by every country, city, financial institution and company around the world, the drive to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 can still avert the worst impacts of climate change.Similar urgency and ambition are needed to transform other systems, including how we produce our food and manage our water, land and oceans. Developing countries need more assistance to redress environmental decline. Only then can we get back on track to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030.This report shows that we have the ability to transform our impact on the world. A sustainable economy driven by renewable energy and nature-based solutions will create new jobs, cleaner infrastructure and a resilient future. An inclusive world at peace with nature can ensure that people enjoy better health and the full respect of their human rights so they can live with dignity on a healthy planet.Secretary-General of the United Nations, February 2021Before the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020 was emerging as a moment of truth for our commitment to steer Earth and its people toward sustainability. Momentum was building and global meetings were set to discuss bold action on the three interconnected planetary crises facing humanity, namely the climate crisis, the nature crisis and the pollution crisis. These crises, driven by decades of relentless and unsustainable consumption and production, are amplifying deep inequalities and threatening our collective future. This report makes the strongest scientific case yet for why and how that collective determination must be urgently applied to protecting and restoring our planet. Drawing on a unique and comprehensive synthesis of global environmental assessments, it details the self-defeating and dangerous consequences of our overconsumption of resources and overproduction of waste.The science is clear that we are putting extreme pressures on the planet. According to the 2020 UNEP Emissions Gap Report, while the pandemic resulted in a temporary decline in greenhouse gas emissions, we are heading for at least a 3°C temperature rise this century. Our colleagues at the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) have sounded the alarm on the rapid decline of nature and what this means for Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG).Loss of biodiversity and ecosystem integrity, together with climate change and pollution will undermine our efforts on 80 per cent of assessed SDG Targets, making it even more difficult to report progress on poverty reduction, hunger, health, water, cities and climate. We need to look no further than the global pandemic caused by COVID-19, a zoonotic disease, i.e. transmitted from animal to human, to know that the finely-tuned system of the natural world has been disrupted. And finally, the \"toxic trail\" of economic growthpollution and waste which results every year in the premature deaths of millions of people across the world.While the response to the medical emergency of COVID-19 rightly preoccupies government budgets and political action, the response to this pandemic must ultimately accelerate the economic and social transformations needed to address the planetary emergency. As the UN Secretary-General noted in his State of Planet speech, \"COVID recovery and our planet's repair must be two sides of the same coin.\"The report outlines what the \"repair\" of our planet entails, the transformative actions that can unleash human ingenuity and cooperation to secure livelihoods and well-being for all. Repair means solutions that recognize how our environmental, social and development challenges are interconnected. Repair means shifting our values and worldviews as well as our financial and economic systems. Repair means taking a whole-of-society approach. And repair means being fair and just.With science as our guiding light, UNEP's Medium-Term Strategy (2022-2025) seeks to ensure the link between science, policy and decision-making remains stronger than ever, sustained by strong environmental governance and supported by economic policies that can be the foundation of a catalytic response to the challenges of climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution. In doing so, we support member states, working with partners, scientists, civil society and business to tackle the three interconnected crises so that we stabilize climate; live in harmony with nature and secure a pollution free planet.2021 must be remembered as the year we took it upon ourselves to ensure that the pandemic is remembered not only as a human tragedy, but as the moment when people reconsidered their priorities as individuals and societies and took to heart that safeguarding the health and well-being of current and future generations means safeguarding the health of our planet.Executive Director United Nations Environment Programme, February 2021This report presents a scientific blueprint for how climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution can be tackled jointly within the framework of the Sustainable Development Goals. The report is a synthesis based on evidence from global environmental assessments. It has been a privilege to oversee the production and peer review of the report by the eminent group of experts and advisors appointed by Inger Andersen, the Executive Director of UNEP, for their leading contributions to and intimate understanding of the interface between science and policy in addressing the environmental challenges of today.The expert analysis rests on the synthesis of key findings from a range of recent intergovernmental global environmental assessments and assessments prepared under the auspices of Multilateral Environmental Agreements, UN bodies and others (see annex 1). The report makes reference to the assessments, not the original literature referred therein. The presentation of the findings from the assessments is the responsibility of the authors of the current report. In a limited number of cases, additional high-impact peer-reviewed literature and grey literature have been assessed and referenced in order to present a complete and updated picture of the knowledge base.The results of this synthesis are presented for decision makers in the form of clear, digestible and facts-based key messages and an executive summary substantiated and referenced in the main report. Part I of the report shows how the findings of the assessments are interlinked and add up to an unparalleled planetary emergency. While most of the underlying assessments are relevant for policy formulation, Part II goes a step further in recommending how the accumulated scientific evidence can be turned into concrete and far-reaching actions by a broad range of actors across society in order to transform humankind's relationship with nature.This report was prepared amid the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, which meant that the authors, scientific advisory group and secretariat had to work without ever meeting face to face. All work was carried out through dozens of virtual conference calls. This synthesis would not have been possible without the work undertaken for the international assessments used as the evidence base in this report and the contribution by experts from these assessments. We also highly appreciate the outstanding contributions by the group of experts who have joined us in authoring this report and the valuable gui-dance by the members of the scientific advisory group who peer-reviewed the report multiple times. We would particularly like to acknowledge the sustained enthusiasm for this endeavour by authors and advisors given their many other commitments. We are also indebted to the strong support received from the UNEP secretariat, research fellows, designers and the science communications editor, in particular the visionary guidance and inspiration provided by Inger Andersen and the unwavering commitment of the core team of the secretariat. Transforming nature puts human well-being at riskThe current mode of development degrades the Earth's finite capacity to sustain human well-being • Human well-being critically depends on the Earth's natural systems. Yet the economic, technological and social advances have also led to a reduction of the Earth's capacity to sustain current and future human well-being. Human prosperity relies on the wise use of the planet's finite space and remaining resources, as well as on the protection and restoration of its life-supporting processes and capacity to absorb waste.• Over the last 50 years, the global economy has grown nearly fivefold, due largely to a tripling in extraction of natural resources and energy that has fuelled growth in production and consumption. The world population has increased by a factor of two, to 7.8 billion people, and though on average prosperity has also doubled, about 1.3 billion people remain poor and some 700 million are hungry.• The increasingly unequal and resource-intensive model of development drives environmental decline through climate change, biodiversity loss and other forms of pollution and resource degradation.• Social, economic and financial systems fail to account for the essential benefits society gets from nature and to provide incentives to manage it wisely and maintain its value.The majority of the essential benefits of nature currently have no financial market value despite being the underpinning of current and future prosperity.Society is failing to meet most of its commitments to limit environmental damage• Society is not on course to fulfil the Paris Agreement to limit global warming to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to further limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C. At the current rate, warming will reach 1.5°C by around 2040 and possibly earlier. Taken together, current national policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions put the world on a pathway to warming of at least 3°C by 2100. Human-induced current warming of more than 1°C has already led to shifts in climate zones, changes in precipitation patterns, melting of ice sheets and glaciers, accelerating sea level rise and more frequent and more intense extreme events, threatening people and nature.• None of the agreed global goals for the protection of life on Earth and for halting the degradation of land and oceans have been fully met. Three quarters of the land and two thirds of the oceans are now impacted by humans. One million of the world's estimated 8 million species of plants and animals are threatened with extinction, and many of the ecosystem services essential for human wellbeing are eroding.• Society is on course to restore the Earth's protective stratospheric ozone layer. However, there is a lot more to be done to reduce air and water pollution, safely manage chemicals, and reduce and safely manage waste.The achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals is threatened by an array of escalating and mutually reinforcing environmental risks• Current and projected changes in climate, biodiversity loss and pollution makes achieving the SDGs even more challenging. For example, even small increases in temperature, along with associated changes such as in weather, precipitation, heavier rainfall events, extreme heat, drought and fire, increase risks to health, food security, water supply and human security, and these risks increase along with warming. In 2018 alone, damages from climate-related natural disasters cost about US$155 billion.• The burden of environmental decline is felt by everyone, but disproportionally by the poor and vulnerable and looms even larger over today's youth and future generations. Producers and consumers in wealthy countries often export their environmental footprint to poorer countries through trade and the disposal of waste.• Environmental changes are already undermining hardwon development gains and impeding progress towards ending poverty and hunger, reducing inequalities and promoting sustainable economic growth, work for all and peaceful and inclusive societies. Land degradation, for instance, adversely affects more than 3 billion people.• Earth's capacity to sustain growing needs for nutritious food, water and sanitation will continue to weaken in the face of ongoing environmental declines, as vulnerable and marginalized people are currently experiencing. For example, food security is threatened by the loss of pollinators and fertile soil. Loss of pollinators, threatens annual global crop output worth between US$235 billion and US$577 billion.• The deteriorating state of the planet undermines efforts to achieve healthy lives and well-being for all. Around one quarter of the global burden of disease stems from environment-related risks, including those from animal-borne diseases (such as COVID-19), climate change, and exposure to pollution and toxic chemicals. Pollution causes some 9 million premature deaths annually and millions more die every year from other environment-related health risks.• Environmental risks in cities and urban areas, including those from heatwaves, flash floods, drought, wildfires and pollution, hamper efforts to make human settlements (including informal settlements) inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable.There is an urgent need for a clear break with current trends of environmental decline and the coming decade is crucial• The risks to human well-being and the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals will continue to escalate unless environmental degradation is halted. Global warming of more than 2°C combined with continued loss of biodiversity and increasing pollution will likely have dire consequences for humanity.• The costs of inaction on limiting environmental change far outweigh the costs of action. Global aggregate impacts from climate change are estimated to be very high by the end of the century unless cost-effective mitigations strategies are undertaken.Transforming humankind's relationship with nature is the key to a sustainable future Human knowledge, ingenuity, technology and cooperation can transform societies and economies and secure a sustainable future• Decades of incremental efforts have not stemmed the environmental decline resulting from an expansive development model because vested and short-term interests often prevail.• Only a system-wide transformation will achieve well-being for all within the Earth's capacity to support life, provide resources and absorb waste. This transformation will involve a fundamental change in the technological, economic and social organization of society, including world views, norms, values and governance.• Major shifts in investment and regulation are key to just and informed transformations that overcome inertia and opposition from vested interests. Regulatory processes should embody transparent decision-making and good governance involving all relevant stakeholders. Opposition to change can be defused by redirecting subsidies toward alternative livelihoods and new business models.• The COVID-19 crisis provides an impetus to accelerate transformative change. The pandemic and the ensuing economic upheaval have shown the dangers of ecosystem degradation, as well as the need for international cooperation and greater social and economic resilience. The crisis has had major economic costs and is triggering significant investments. Ensuring that these investments support transformative change is key to attaining sustainability.Earth's environmental emergencies should be addressed together to achieve sustainability• Given the interconnected nature of climate change, loss of biodiversity, land degradation, and air and water pollution, it is essential that these problems are tackled together.Response options that address multiple issues can mitigate multidimensional vulnerability, minimize trade-offs and maximize synergies.• Limiting global warming to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to further limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C requires rapid implementation and a significant strengthening of pledges under the Paris Agreement. Globally, net carbon dioxide emissions need to decline by 45 per cent by 2030 compared with 2010 levels and reach net zero by 2050 to put the world on a pathway to 1.5°C with a probability of about 50 per cent, whereas more ambitious targets would be necessary for higher certainty.A pathway to 2°C would require global emissions to be reduced by 25 per cent by 2030 compared with 2010 levels and reach net zero by around 2070. Both pathways entail rapid transformations in areas including energy systems, land use, agriculture, forest protection, urban development, infrastructure and lifestyles. Mitigating climate change is vital, urgent and cost saving: the lower the degree of warming, the easier and cheaper it will be to adapt.• The loss of biodiversity can only be halted and reversed by providing space dedicated for nature while also addressing drivers such as changing land and sea use, overexploitation, climate change, pollution and invasive alien species. To prevent extinctions and maintain nature's life-supporting contributions, biodiversity conservation and restoration must be integral to the many uses of terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems, and coupled with an expanded and better-managed global network of interconnected protected areas designed to be resilient to climate change.• The adverse effects of chemicals and waste on the environment and human health can be substantially reduced by implementing existing international chemicals conventions. Further progress will require strengthening the science-policy interface as the basis for evidence-based policymaking and improved management systems, along with legal and regulatory reform.The economic and financial systems can and should be transformed to lead and power the shift to sustainability• Governments should incorporate full natural capital accounting into their decision-making and use policies and regulatory frameworks to provide incentives for businesses to do the same. Yardsticks such as inclusive wealth (the sum of produced, natural, human and social capital) provide a better basis for investment decisions than gross domestic product, as they reflect the capacity of current and future generations to achieve and sustain higher living standards.• Governments should shift away from environmentally harmful subsidies, invest in low-carbon and nature-friendly solutions and technologies, and systematically internalize environmental and social costs.• Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals will require massive shifts and increases in public and private financial flows and investment patterns, including in the water, food and energy sectors. Incentives must be shifted so that investments in sustainable development are financially attractive.• The Global South needs increased access to low-interest finance in order to build its capacity and overhaul accounting systems and policy frameworks in pursuit of the Sustainable Development Goals. The Global North has exacerbated the finance gap by failing to meet its commitments on international environmental and development assistance.• Shifting taxation from production and labour to resource use and waste promotes a circular economy. Potential inequalities resulting from this shift can be offset through social safety nets.• Reducing inequalities and the risk of social conflict requires the minimization and reversal of environmental degradation and declines in natural resources. It also requires structural changes to the economy, including steps to promote equity and address individual and community rights to property, resources and education.The food, water and energy systems can and should be transformed to meet growing human needs in an equitable, resilient and environmentally-friendly manner• Feeding humanity, ensuring water and energy security, and enhancing the conservation, restoration and sustainable use of nature are complementary and closely interdependent goals. Achieving these goals requires food systems that work with nature, reduce waste, and are adaptive to change and resilient to shocks. Small-scale farmers, especially women farmers, are central to the challenge of food and nutrition security and must be empowered.• Changes in global patterns of consumption are critical to transforming food, water and energy systems, and to challenging social norms and business practices. Improving access to safe, nutritious and affordable food for all, while reducing food waste and changing dietary choices and consumer behaviour in high-income countries and groups, is central for the achievement of hunger, biodiversity, waste and climate goals.• Ensuring sustainable food production from the oceans while protecting marine biodiversity requires policy action to apply sustainable harvesting approaches to fisheries management, improve spatial planning and address threats such as climate change, ocean acidification and pollution.• Sustaining freshwater in the context of climate change, rising demand, and increased pollution involves cross-sectoral and sector-specific interventions at the watershed or river basin scale. This can be achieved by simultaneously increasing water-use efficiency, wisely expanding storage, reducing pollution, improving water quality, minimizing disruption and fostering the restoration of natural habitats and flow regimes.• Universal access to clean and affordable energy requires a transformation of both the production and use of energy.Increasing the supply of clean energy coupled with innovation and efficiency gains is vital to achieving equitable and sustainable economic growth while limiting global warming. Clean energy will also reduce poverty and indoor and outdoor air pollution and provide critical services such as communications, lighting and water pumping.Keeping the planet healthy is key to providing health and well-being for all• Policies, good practices and appropriate technologies to limit climate change, ecosystem degradation and pollution can significantly reduce associated human health risks, including from respiratory diseases, water-borne, vectorborne and animal-borne diseases, malnutrition, extreme weather events and chemical exposure. Technological change and diffusion are important mechanisms to drive transformation.• A One Health approach integrates action across sectors and disciplines to protect the health of people, animals and the environment. Such an approach is key to minimize future human health risks from climate change, ecosystem degradation and deteriorating food, air and water quality.It is also essential in preventing and limiting the impact of future health emergencies, including pandemic outbreaks of animal-borne diseases such as COVID-19.• Cities and other settlements, especially rapidly expanding urban areas and informal settlements, must be made more sustainable. Improvements in urban planning, governance, infrastructure and the use of nature-based solutions can be cost-effective ways to reduce pollution and make settlements more environment friendly and resilient to climate change impacts such as increased urban heat island effects and flooding. Blue and green infrastructure in urban areas have significant benefits for mental health.Everyone has a part to play in transforming social and economic systems for a sustainable future• All actors have individual, complementary and nested roles to play in bringing about cross-sectoral and economy-wide transformative change with immediate and long-term impact. This can be enhanced through capacity-building and education. Governments initiate and lead in intergovernmental cooperation, policies and legislation that transform society and the economy. Such transformations enable the private sector, financial institutions, labour organizations, scientific and educational bodies and media as well as households and civil society groups to initiate and lead transformations in their domains.• Individuals can facilitate transformation by, for instance, exercising their voting and civic rights, changing their diets and travel habits, avoiding waste of food and resources, and reducing their consumption of water and energy. They can also promote behavioural change by raising awareness in their communities. Human cooperation, innovation and knowledge-sharing will create new social and economic possibilities and opportunities in the transformation to a sustainable future.HUMAN DEVELOPMENT (from 2020): The well-being of today's youth and future generations depends on an urgent and clear break with the current trends of environmental decline. Human knowledge, ingenuity, technology and cooperation need to be redeployed from transforming nature to transforming humankind's relationship with nature. Time is of the essence. Society needs to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 45 per cent by 2030 compared to 2010 levels and reach net-zero emissions by 2050 to limit warming to 1.5 °C as aspired to in the Paris Agreement, while at the same time conserving and restoring biodiversity and minimizing pollution and waste.Humanity has been grappling with environmental challenges that have grown in number and severity ever since the Stockholm Conference in 1972. The scientific assessments synthesized in this report show that those challenges now represent a planetary emergency. While tackling the emergency is demanding, the report lights a path to a sustainable future marked with new possibilities and opportunities.Part I of the report addresses how the current expansive mode of development degrades and exceeds the Earth's finite capacity to sustain human well-being. The world is failing to meet most of its commitments to limit environmental damage and this increasingly threatens the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).A. The current mode of development degrades the Earth's finite capacity to sustain human well-beingHuman well-being is critically dependent on Earth's natural systems. Economic, social and technological advances have come at the expense of the Earth's capacity to sustain current and future human well-being. Human prosperity rests on the wise use of the finite space and resources available to all life on Earth, as well as on the restoration of its life-supporting processes and capacity to absorb human waste. Every person benefits from clean air and water, a protective stratospheric ozone layer, a hospitable climate and the many additional benefits that land and oceans provide, including food, medicines, energy, materials, inspiration and a sense of place. The rich web of life, of which humanity is a part, modulates and maintains Earth's systems in ways critical to people, for example by reducing the severity of natural disasters and by providing soil, pollination and pest control that help people harness the planet's fertility. Over the past 50 years, human societies have dramatically increased the production and extraction of food, energy and materials, resulting in economic, technological and social advances and increased prosperity for many. However, the exploitation of nature has reached unsustainable levels and is undermining the Earth's capacity to sustain human well-being, now and in the future.Human prosperity is strained by widening inequalities, whereby the burden of environmental decline weighs heaviest on the poor and vulnerable and looms even larger over today's youth and future generations. Across the world, people are living longer, are more educated and have greater opportunities on average than previous generations, but the wealth gap is growing between rich and poor, both among and within countries. Economic growth and poverty reduction occurred across the developing world prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, little of the economic progress seen in high-and middle-income countries has benefitted the least developed countries. About 1.3 billion people remain poor, and some 700 million are going hungry, and both numbers are expected to increase significantly because of the economic impact of the pandemic. Environmental decline affects and concerns everyone, rich and poor. However, the burden weighs most heavily on the poor and vulnerable, where women are often overrepresented. Future generations in many localities risk a situation where more people must struggle to make a living from diminished natural resources in a changing environment.Economic and financial systems fail to account for the essential benefits that humanity gets from nature and to provide incentives to manage nature wisely and maintain its value. Nature provides the foundation for human existence and prosperity. From an economic perspective, nature is a vital capital asset that provides many essential goods and services. Conventional metrics like gross domestic product (GDP) overstate progress because they fail to adequately capture the costs of environmental degradation or reflect declines in natural capital. Conventional economic measu-res also fail to reflect indicators of health, education and other dimensions of human well-being. Most of the essential benefits of nature currently have no financial or market value despite providing the underpinnings of current and future prosperity. Inclusive wealth, which sums the value of natural, human, manufactured and social capital, is a better measure of sustainable progress. The current practice of excluding the value of nature and the costs of its degradation from economic accounting and market prices, along with the impact of environmentally harmful subsidies such as those for agricultural output and fossil fuel energy, pose an increasing risk to economies and societies. Excluding the value of nature skews investment away from economic solutions that conserve and restore nature, reduce pollution, expand renewable energy and make more sustainable use of resources while also increasing prosperity and well-being.The resource-intensive and increasingly unequal model of human development indirectly drives global environmental change. Over the last 50 years, the human population has more than doubled, while the extraction of materials and the production of primary energy and food have all more than tripled. The global economy has grown nearly fivefold, and trade has grown tenfold. Resource use is driven by growing supply resulting from innovation and efficiency gains in production of goods and services as well as from marketing, governance and increasing consumer demands from a wealthier and expanding population. People in high-income countries generally consume far more than people in low-and middle-income countries. The world population, the economy and resource use are expected to continue growing, though at a slower rate. By 2050, the global population is projected to have increased from 7.8 billion people today to nearly 9 billion and become wealthier and more urban. The production of energy is projected to increase by about 50 per cent and food by 70 per cent. Projections depend on the implementation of policies in areas ranging from reproductive health and tenure rights to the economy.Increases in resource use and waste generation drive global environmental change in ways that transcend borders and continents. To satisfy growing demands, humans use an ever-increasing fraction of the Earth's land, freshwater and oceans for the production and extraction of food, fibre, energy and minerals as well as for industrial facilities, infrastructure and settlements. In doing so, society also releases greenhouse gases and pollutants, including nutrients and toxic chemicals as well as household, industrial and human waste. Humans modify life and move organisms around the world in pursuit of increased production or through accidental introductions. These practices also narrow down the range of genetic material in domesticated species. Many of the impacts of human activities are felt over large distances, such as through transboundary pollution or when wealthy countries export their environmental footprint by meeting their demands through trade.B. Society is failing to meet most of its commitments to limit environmental damage The Earth's climate is changing and its web of life is unravelling as land and oceans degrade and chemicals and waste accumulate beyond agreed limits. The international community has set targets, informed by science, in multilateral agreements for protecting natural assets and limiting harmful environmental change. Despite some progress, efforts to date have failed to meet any of the agreed targets.The world is not on course to fulfil the Paris Agreement to limit global warming to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels, let alone meet the 1.5°C aspiration. The Earth's mean near-surface temperature has already risen by more than 1°C compared to the period from 1850 to 1900. At the current rate, warming will reach 1.5°C by around 2040 and possibly earlier. Taken together, current national policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions put the world on a pathway to warming of at least 3°C by 2100, though this may change as countries update their pledges. 1 Current warming, which is greater over land than over the ocean and is highest in the polar regions, has already led to melting of ice sheets and glaciers, accelerating increases in sea level, more frequent and more intense extreme events, changes in precipitation patterns, as well as shifts in climate zones, including expansion of arid zones and contraction of polar zones. Emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases are still increasing, with current atmospheric concentrations much higher than at any time in the past 800,000 years. The accumulation of heat in the oceans will persist for centuries and affect many future generations. About two thirds of the warming caused by anthropogenic greenhouse gases is due to carbon dioxide, mostly originating from the use of fossil fuels and some industrial processes. About one quarter of the warming results from activities related to the land -agriculture, pastoralism, forestry and especially changing natural land covers to human-dominated ones. Natural sinks today are only able to absorb around half of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, split between terrestrial ecosystems and the ocean. The increased uptake of carbon dioxide by the oceans is causing harmful ocean acidification. To fulfil the Paris Agreement to limit warming to well below 2°C or meet the agreement's aspiration of restricting the increase to 1.5°C, net global emissions from human activities need to reach zero or even become negative by the middle of the century. While meeting the Paris Agreement is technically feasible, political commitment to do so is currently lacking.None of the global goals for the protection of life on Earth have been fully met, including those in the strategic plan for biodiversity 2011-2020 and its Aichi biodiversity targets.At the global level, only six of the 20 Aichi targets have been partially achieved, including increases in the proportion of land and oceans designated as protected areas and improved international financial flows to developing countries. Little or no progress has been made on others, such as eliminating harmful subsidies. Species are currently going extinct tens to hundreds of times faster than the natural background rate. One million of the world's estimated 8 million species of plants and animals are threatened with extinction. The population sizes of wild vertebrates have dropped by an average of 68 per cent in the last 50 years, and the abundance of many wild insect species has fallen by more than half. The number of local varieties of domesticated plants and animal breeds and their wild relatives has been reduced sharply.For example, over 9 per cent of animal breeds have become extinct and at least another 17 per cent are threatened with extinction. Ecosystems are degrading at an unprecedented rate, driven by land-use change, exploitation, climate change, pollution and invasive alien species. Climate change exacerbates other threats to biodiversity, and many plant and animal species have already experienced changes in their range, abundance and seasonal activity. Degradation of ecosystems is impacting their functions and harming their ability to support human well-being. Loss of biodiversity is anticipated to accelerate in coming decades, unless actions to halt and reverse human transformation and degradation of ecosystems and to limit climate change are urgently implemented.Society is not on course to achieve land degradation neutrality, where degradation is minimized and offset by restoration. Land degradation objectives are embedded in the SDGs and land degradation neutrality is a focus of the UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD).International targets on aspects such as combatting desertification, soil degradation, or wetland loss as well as national targets on preventing or reversing land degradation have not been sufficient to achieve land degradation neutrality. Natural ecosystems have been transformed by humans at an accelerating rate since the middle of the twentieth century. Only a quarter of the original habitat on ice-free land is still functioning in a nearly natural way. Much of this habitat is located in dry, cold, or mountainous areas with low human population densities and also includes the protected areas that currently cover 15 per cent of the total land area. A quarter of land has been radically transformed to cropland, plantations and other human uses. Half of the land area functions in an increasingly human-dominated and semi-natural way. It includes the rangelands grazed by livestock, the semi-natural forests harvested for wood and the freshwater systems altered by water use. The world's forests constitute nearly a third of the land area, and about 10 per cent of their area has been lost through conversions to other land uses since 1990, though the deforestation rate is decreasing. Of the combined area of semi-natural and highly transformed landscapes, around one sixth is degraded to the degree that ecological capacities to support human well-being are reduced. Of particular concern is degradation where ecological processes have been impaired to the point that the ecosystem is no longer able to recover. Wetlands are the most transformed and degraded ecosystem type. Only 15 per cent of wetlands remain. Land degradation and transformation contributed around a quarter of greenhouse gas emissions in the decade 2010-2019. Over half of these emissions derive from land transformation (particularly deforestation) and most of the remainder from the loss of soil carbon in cultivated land. Notwithstanding the agreed goal of halting land degradation, all development scenarios explored in the relevant assessments project that land degradation will continue to increase in the twenty-first century. The fraction of remaining near-natural land is projected to be only 10 per cent by mid-century, while degraded land will reach over 20 per cent.Many of the targets for conservation, restoration and sustainable use of oceans, coasts and marine resources will likely not be fully met as marine and coastal ecosystems are declining. Targets for oceans and coasts have been agreed as part of the SDGs. Detrimental human activities including overfishing, coastal and offshore infrastructure and shipping, climate change, ocean acidification and waste and nutrient runoff combine to affect two thirds of ocean area. One third of wild marine fish stocks were overharvested in 2015, a portion that has increased from 10 per cent in 1974. Sixty per cent of stocks are fished at maximum sustainable yield and only 7 per cent are underexploited. Fertilizers entering coastal ecosystems have produced more than 400 \"dead zones\" totalling more than 245,000 km 2 -an area bigger than the United Kingdom or Ecuador. Marine plastics pollution has increased tenfold since 1980, constituting 60-80 per cent of marine debris, and is found in all oceans at all depths and concentrates in the ocean currents. Marine plastic litter causes ecological impacts including entanglement and ingestion and can act as a vector for invasive species and other pollutants. The risk of irreversible loss of marine and coastal ecosystems including seagrass meadows and kelp forests increases with global warming. Warming of 2ºC is projected to result in a decrea-se in the biomass of marine animal communities and their productivity. Coral reefs are particularly vulnerable to climate change and are projected to decline to 10-30 per cent of their former cover at 1.5°C of warming and to less than 1 per cent at 2°C of warming, compromising food provision, tourism and coastal protection. Depending on the amount of sea level rise, 20-90 per cent of current coastal wetlands may be lost by the end of the century. Climate change is increasing the chances of the Arctic Ocean being ice-free in summer, further disrupting ocean circulation and Arctic ecosystems.The world is on course to restore Earth's protective stratospheric ozone layer, but there is much more to be done to reduce air and water pollution and to safely manage chemicals and waste. C. An array of escalating and mutually reinforcing environmental risks threatens human well-being and the achievement of the Sustainable Development GoalsCurrent and projected future environmental degradation will seriously undermine society's chances of achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (figure ES.1). Recent data and projected trends show that society prior to the COVID-19 pandemic was reducing hunger, increasing access to safe drinking water and adequate sanitation and increasing access to clean modern energy services, but not enough to meet the targets in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Current and projected changes in climate, biodiversity loss and pollution make achieving the SDGs even more challenging. For example, even small increases in temperature, along with associated changes such as in weather, precipitation, heavier rainfall events, extreme heat, drought and fire, increase risks to health, food security, water supply and human security, and these risks increase along with warming. Combined environmental changes increase the risks of crossing thresholds beyond which ecological and climatic shifts accelerate and become very hard to reverse. Socioeconomic development patterns strongly determine the vulnerability and exposure of people, and thus related impacts, as well as the groups in society that would bear the brunt of these impacts. The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted already uneven progress towards achieving many of the SDGs and caused the first increase in global poverty in decades by pushing an estimated 70 million more people into extreme poverty in 2020. Earth's capacity to meet growing human needs for nutritious food, water and sanitation for all will weaken in the face of continued environmental decline. Environmental degradation makes ending hunger, achieving food security and improved nutrition and promoting sustainable agriculture (SDG 2) more demanding. Agricultural yields are projected to be negatively impacted by climate change due to warming, changing precipitation patterns, greater frequency of extreme events such as heatwaves, heavy precipitation in several regions, and droughts in some regions, and changes in the incidence of pests and diseases. While sustainability choices influence food security at the local scale, climate change risks to food security could become very high at 2°C, whilst 4°C of warming is considered catastrophic. Air pollution such as ground-level ozone also negatively impacts agricultural yields and will be impacted by climate change. Species and genetic diversity in agriculture, which are critical to resilient food systems, is lower than ever. Future agricultural expansion is projected to take place on more marginal lands with lower yields. Biodiversity loss poses risks to food production. The loss of animal pollinators, critical to more than 75 per cent of food crops, including many fruit and vegetables and cash crops such as coffee, cocoa and almonds, threatens annual global crop output worth between US$235 billion and US$577 billion. Soil erosion from agricultural fields is estimated to be 10 to more than 100 times higher than the soil formation rate, affecting agricultural yields through reduced water-holding capacity and loss of nutrients. An estimated 176 gigatonnes of soil organic carbon has been lost historically, mostly from land-use change, and another 27 gigatonnes is projected to be lost between 2010 and 2050. Wild fish catch, which has already declined due to overfishing, is under additional threat due to changing climatic conditions, ocean acidification and pollution. Efforts to ensure the availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all (SDG 6) are also impeded by environmental change. Climate change will exacerbate water stress risks, especially in areas of decreased precipitation and where groundwater is already being depleted, affecting both agriculture and more than 2 billion people who already experience water stress.Water pollution has continued to worsen over the last two decades, increasing the threats to freshwater ecosystems and human health.The deteriorating health of the planet undermines efforts to secure healthy lives and well-being for all (SDG 3). Pollution is estimated to cause some 9 million premature deaths annually and millions more die every year from other environment related health risks. Around one quarter of the global burden of disease stems from environment-related risks, including climate change, air and water pollution, and exposure to toxic chemicals. Climate-related health risks, which become greater with rising temperatures, include undernutrition, vectorborne diseases (including dengue, chikungunya, yellow fever and zika virus), animal-borne (zoonotic) diseases (see box below), heat-related morbidity and mortality, and food-and water-borne diseases. Indoor air pollution from cooking with biomass on traditional stoves, and outdoor air pollution, much from the combustion of fossil fuels, currently cause around 6.5 million premature deaths per year related to respiratory diseases and are projected to continue to represent a serious human health risk. Other major environmental health risks include lack of access to clean drinking water and sanitation services, causing 1.7 million deaths per year from diarrheal diseases, many of which are deaths of children under the age of five. Pollution-related health risks also stem from exposure to heavy metals and chemicals. The stratospheric ozone layer -which is slowly recovering -reduces the risk of excessive solar ultraviolet radiation exposure that leads to skin cancer, cataracts and other health problems in humans. As a result of the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services, nature's ability to support human health through regulation of air and water quality is in decline in many places, as well as its ability to provide opportunities for recreation and relaxation, which support physical and mental health and well-being. Biodiversity loss is also negatively affecting nature's ability to supply medicines. An estimated 4 billion people -more than half the global population -rely primarily on natural medicines for their health care, and some 70 per cent of drugs used for treating cancer are natural or are synthetic products inspired by nature. Antimicrobial resistance, industrial chemicals, multi-exposures and newly emerging diseases are increasingly threatening human health and well-being. The risks to human well-being and to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals will continue to escalate unless current rates of environmental degradation are halted. Global warming of more than 2°C combined with continued loss of biodiversity and increasing pollution will likely have dire consequences for humanity. If warming exceeds 2ºC, both marine and terrestrial animals and plants are projected to decline, including the decline of warm-water coral reefs by 99 per cent, the decline of Arctic summer sea ice, large declines in marine fishery catches and the placing of 20-30 per cent of terrestrial species at increased risk of extinction. Substantial increases in heatwaves, heavy precipitation in several regions and drought in some regions are associated with global warming, and in turn increase risks to food security. Crop yields are already declining in some regions due to global warming. The fraction of remaining near-natural land is projected to be only 10 per cent by mid-century, while degraded land will reach over 20 per cent.The costs of inaction on limiting environmental changes far outweighs the costs of action. By 2100, negative impacts from climate change exceeding 2.5°C of warming are likely to be substantial, far in excess of impacts with limiting warming to 1.5°C or well below 2°C. Furthermore, limiting greenhouse gas emissions would also generate considerable benefits, including for human health. Cost estimates for reducing emissions, though substantial, are far less than the avoided economic damage. There is an urgent need for a clear break with current trends of environmental decline, and the coming decade is crucial. Only system-wide transformation will enable humanity to achieve well-being for all within the Earth's finite capacity to provide resources and absorb human waste. Society continues to exceed and degrade the Earth's capacities despite clear evidence of the risk that this development path poses to humanity and growing efforts to reduce its environmental impacts. Continuing along this path constitutes an ongoing and increasing risk to current and future prosperity and well-being. Human skills need to be redeployed from transforming nature to transforming the social and economic fabric of society. This effort needs to put human well-being centre stage, and speed progress towards achieving the opportunities set out in the indivisible and interdependent SDGs, whose target date is fast approaching. Achieving sustainability will entail interventions across scales and sectors and changes to incentive structures, management systems, decision-making processes, rules and regulations. Transformed incentive structures would encourage conservation and discourage actions that result in environmental degradation. Systems for policymaking, planning and managing natural resources and the use of lands and waters would be coordinated across sectors and jurisdictions; pre-emptive in addressing emerging threats via effective environmental monitoring and evaluation; include meaningful participation, especially of stakeholders and rightsholders such as indigenous peoples and local communities; and be designed for resilience and adapted to uncertainties. Strong environmental laws would protect ecosystems and the human enjoyment of a healthy environment, bolstered by consistent enforcement of laws and independent judiciaries. These three sets of governance interventions have been called the \"levers\" of transformation to reflect their power to effect change at the specified leverage points and also more broadly.Opposition from vested interests to transformations aiming to secure a sustainable and prosperous future is to be expected but can be addressed. Existing infrastructure and built capital provide system inertia that can make change difficult and incurs short-term costs, especially if change involves the premature retirement of capital stock. Also, individuals and organizations have habits, procedures and ways of doing business that can yield a reluctance and resistance to change. Individuals and organizations can also oppose change that disrupts their livelihoods, market share and revenues, or that otherwise appear unfair. E. Earth's environmental emergencies must be addressed together to achieve sustainabilityGiven the interconnected nature of climate change, loss of biodiversity, land degradation, and air and water pollution, it is essential that these problems are tackled together now. Immediate action is required to mitigate climate change, conserve and restore biodiversity, improve air and water quality, make more efficient use of resources and reduce the adverse effects of chemicals. Actions also need to be taken now even where the benefits may not be realized for years due to the long-lasting nature of environmental effects or to inertia in the socio-economic system. Essential actions with delayed effects include reforestation and restoration of degraded lands. Response options that can address multiple environmental issues, mitigate multidimensional vulnerability and help minimize trade-offs and maximize synergies, need to be implemented. Numerous response options that can preserve and restore the environment and contribute to achieving some of the other SDGs have already been identified. For example, large-scale reforestation with native vegetation can simultaneously help address climate change, biodiversity loss, land degradation and water security. A key challenge is to avoid unintended consequences. For instance, large scale afforestation schemes and replacing native vegetation with monoculture crops to supply bioenergy can be detrimental to biodiversity and water resources.The further development and implementation of the goals, targets, commitments, and mechanisms under the key multilateral agreements on climate change, biodiversity, land-degradation, oceans and pollution need to be aligned and become more synergistic and mutually supportive. There needs to be enhanced harmonization in the implementation, monitoring and financing of the multilateral agreements. Sustainable policies, technologies and management practices need to be implemented within the interconnected agriculture-fisheries-forestry-water-energy systems given their impact on climate, biodiversity and land degradation.Governments must scale up and accelerate action to meet the Paris Agreement goals and limit dangerous climate change. Evidence shows that the risks associated with climate change, including the risks of extreme weather events, impacts on unique and threatened systems, and large-scale discontinuities such as the disintegration of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets (Figure 1.1), are generally higher than previously understood. Limiting the global mean temperature increase to well below 2°C and pursuing efforts to hold it to 1.5°C, in line with the Paris Agreement, require immediate significant strengthening and rapid implementation of existing national pledges to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. To limit global warming to 1.5°C, with a probability of about 50 per cent, net emissions of carbon dioxide will need to be reduced by 45 per cent by 2030 compared to 2010 levels and reach zero by 2050. Transboundary agreements and regional frameworks provide a strong foundation for regional coordination and cooperation for the equitable sharing of water.Universal access to clean energy requires a rapid transition to low-carbon systems in both the production and use of energy. Improving access to affordable and modern energy (SDG 7) coupled with innovation and efficiency gains are vital to achieving equitable and sustainable economic growth while limiting global warming. Clean energy will also reduce poverty and indoor and outdoor air pollution and provide critical services such as communications, lighting and water pumping. Achieving this goal while combating climate change involves a rapid transition to low-carbon energy systems encompassing both production and consumption. Investments in the energy transition need to grow five-or sixfold between now and 2050 to achieve the Paris Agreement aspiration of limiting warming to 1.5°C. Renewable energy technologies such as wind and solar, along with improved energy efficiency in buildings and elsewhere, will be key. Governments must develop laws and policies that enable greater public and private investments in generation and distribution, while also encouraging more responsible energy consumption. Government policy and incentives can speed the phase-out of fossil fuels in power generation and transportation, including by supporting the development of renewable energy storage and electric vehicles. Large-scale renewable energy installations on land, watercourses and in the ocean require careful planning to avoid or minimize adverse effects on nature and on food and water security.H. Keeping the planet healthy is key to providing health and well-being for allReversing environmental decline reduces threats to human health and well-being. Human health and the health of the planet are closely interlinked, underlining how policies aimed at protecting human and planetary health should also be integrated. For example, mitigating greenhouse gas emissions will limit the health risks and impacts from climate change. These include vector-and water-borne diseases such as malaria and cholera, heat stress, extreme weather events, loss of nutrients in foods, air pollution leading to cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. Halting and reversing ecosystem degradation will help safeguard food and water security, secure medicinal plants and genetic resources valuable to medical research and reduce the risk of zoonotic disease pandemics. The reduction of air and water pollution and safe management of chemicals are key to safeguarding human health.Future human health risks from environmental decline can be minimized with a One Health approach. One Health is an approach that seeks to simultaneously secure optimal outcomes for human health, animal health and the health of the environment. A healthy society relies on a multifactorial foundation of physical, mental and social well-being, which can only be maintained and fostered if cross-sectoral and interdisciplinary approaches are pursued. Collaborative efforts under a One Health approach can prevent human health disasters such as zoonotic pandemics. The need for such an approach is widely recognized as a critical component in creating a healthier world. Make own international activities and operations sustainable. d) Health and well-being Facilitate international cooperation on protecting the health of the planet in order to provide health and well-being for all. Advance a One Health approach and strategies to meet WHO guidelines for air pollutants. Continue to promote the coordination and implementation of existing chemicals conventions and strengthen the science-policy interface for chemicals and waste. Implement monitoring and surveillance and early warning systems. e) Cities and settlements Promote sustainable urban planning, nature-based solutions for climate and biodiversity in urban areas, retrofitting of blue and green infrastructure, and access to urban services including clean energy and water.2. Transform economic and financial systems so they lead and power the shift toward sustainability a) Accounting for nature Facilitate international cooperation on frameworks for natural capital accounting, reform of measures and models of economic growth including through the use of natural capital and inclusive wealth in decision-making, and reform of trade systems to make them more fair and environmentally sustainable. Support sustainable urban planning and investments in low-carbon infrastructure, including mass transportation, congestion charges, nature-based solutions and green and blue spaces.2. Transform economic and financial systems so they lead and power the shift toward sustainability a) Accounting for nature Promote and use natural capital accounting and inclusive wealth in decision-making, including lending and grant-making policies. Promote the internalization of externalities in prices and a circular economy. b) Subsidies and markets Promote the elimination of environmentally harmful subsidies. Facilitate carbon trading, schemes for offsetting nature and payments for ecosystem services. Develop environmental and social risk registers for all financial transactions. c) Investments Facilitate a major shift away from investments in environmentally unsustainable activities and toward economic activities that enhance the stock of natural assets. Fund the transition to a circular, green and low-carbon economy. Funding should flow to resilience, adaptation and just transition programmes. Fund research and development nationally and through international development assistance.3. Transform food, water and energy systems to meet growing human needs in an equitable, resilient and environmentally friendly manner a) Access Fund programmes that improve access to affordable and nutritious food, clean energy and safe water for all. b) Food and water Finance sustainable intensification and ecological intensification of agriculture, and sustainable fisheries, and stop supporting unsustainable activities such as deforestation.Advance the use of agricultural, forestry, aquaculture and fisheries certification standards and labelling and encourage healthy diets, and reductions in food, water and energy waste. Support the development and use of certification standards for agriculture, fishing, aquaculture, forestry and water use. c) Energy Finance low-carbon energy production and use, and stop supporting unsustainable activities, such as fossil fuel energy.1. Address Earth's environmental emergencies and human well-being together a) Synergies Help develop and comply with strong environmental legislation that levels the playing field so that firms cannot gain competitive advantage by externalizing costs that are then borne by society. Implement certified and traceable sustainable practices along the complete supply chain. Disclose climate-related financial risk, use of natural resources and the impact of activities on the environment. Practise corporate social responsibility. b) Climate change Adjust business models and align them with the global net-zero carbon emissions objective and sustainability practices in all sectors, including in shipping and aviation. Investors should demand information from companies on the resilience of those models. c) Biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation Develop and promote innovative publicprivate partnerships for financing and engaging in the conservation and restoration of biodiversity, including through the use of payments for ecosystem services. Implement sustainable land management practices for agriculture and forestry. Engage in transformative landscape governance networks. Develop sustainable global supply chains for deforestation-free agricultural commodities. d) Health and well-being Comply with environmental standards to protect human health.Move industries to a sustainable and circular business model by reducing waste and resource use and encouraging sharing, reuse and recycling. Promote and support plastic free/environmentally friendly packaging. Conduct transparent risk assessments of the impact of chemicals on the environment and human health. Increase the use of green chemistry, invest in waste recycling and set high standards for waste disposal. e) Cities and settlements Engage with and support government in sustainable urban planning, public transport, energy-efficient buildings and partnerships to enhance access to urban services.2. Transform economic and financial systems so they lead and power the shift toward sustainability a) Accounting for nature Use natural capital in decision-making and develop environmental and social risk registers for all projects and investments. b) Subsidies and markets Engage in carbon trading, schemes for offsetting nature, and payments for ecosystem services. Promote behaviour change in customers. Further develop and implement social and environmental standards for corporate operations. c) Investments Shift investments and operations away from unsustainable industries, such as fossil fuels. Invest in innovation, environmentally sound technologies and move towards a circular economy.3. Transform food, water and energy systems to meet growing human needs in an equitable, resilient and environmentally friendly manner a) Access Develop and invest in systems to produce, store and distribute affordable and clean power and water and healthy food to all. b) Food and water Provide modern food storage and distribution services that minimize waste. Promote the development and use of food certification standards and product labelling. Invest in sustainable intensification in agriculture, fisheries and aquaculture. Develop climate-resilient crops and livestock breeds as well as alternatives to harmful agricultural inputs, including to fertilizers and pesticides. c) Energy Develop, invest in and use low-carbon energy technologies and distribution networks.1. Address Earth's environmental emergencies and human well-being together a) Synergies Support education, promote youth movements and engage communities in citizen science. Participate in community-led initiatives to promote sustainable consumption and production. Help hold societal actors accountable for their environmental promises, commitments and responsibilities. Support the training of the next generation of leaders. b) Climate change Promote and align activities and operations with the net-zero carbon emissions objective. Implement mitigation, adaptation and resilience programmes and projects, including through nature-based solutions. c) Biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation Support and implement efforts for the conservation, restoration and sustainable use of biodiversity. Develop localregional-national conservation programmes. Participate in community-led initiatives to conserve nature. Engage in transformative landscape governance networks. Support the development and management of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures. d) Health and well-being Raise awareness on chemical safety and take a greater role in the SAICM chemicals management processes. Work with communities and local municipalities for the safe disposal of waste. e) Cities and settlements Campaign for and support sustainable urban planning and improved access to urban services and community initiatives, especially for the urban poor.2. Transform economic and financial systems so they lead and power the shift toward sustainability a) Accounting for nature Promote the use of natural capital accounting, and initiatives for the transformation to a sustainable and circular economy. b) Subsidies and markets Engage in carbon trading, schemes for offsetting of nature and payment for ecosystem services Promote behavioural change in consumption and production, including among their own members and wider society. c) Investments Advocate for policies and regulations that promote investment in sustainable development.3. Transform food, water and energy systems to meet growing human needs in an equitable, resilient and environmentally friendly manner a) Access Advocate for and implement programmes and projects for improved access to affordable and nutritious food, clean energy and safe water for all. b) Food and water Develop and implement initiatives for the ecological intensification and sustainable use of multifunctional landscapes. Promote dietary transitions and reductions in food, water and energy waste. Assist in improving certification standards. c) Energy Participate in community-led initiatives to shift toward cleaner fuels, increase energy-efficiency, conserve energy and develop sustainable bioenergy strategies.Individuals, households, civil society and youth groups, and indigenous peoples and local communities 1. Address Earth's environmental emergencies and human well-being together a) Synergies Foster social norms and behaviours that embody sustainability principles by exercising voting and civic rights and holding governments and the private sector accountable for their actions. Review and comment on local and national policies. Engage in initiatives that promote sustainable consumption. Engage in education and citizenscience initiatives. b) Climate change Make climate-friendly everyday choices on travel and consumption that contribute to the net-zero carbon emissions objective. Engage in local adaptation and resilience initiatives, including through nature-based solutions. c) Biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation Engage in local and national conservation and restoration efforts, transformative landscape governance networks and awareness campaigns to influence consumer behaviour. d) Health and well-being Understand and promote the links between environment and human health. Participate in community-led clean-ups of waste in public spaces. Ensure materials are recycled and waste is properly disposed of. e) Cities and settlements Engage in participatory processes to advance sustainable urban planning and initiatives to increase access to urban services, and promote nature-based solutions and green and blue infrastructure.2. Transform economic and financial systems so they lead and power the shift toward sustainability a) Accounting for nature Foster economic and financial transformations by supporting initiatives to include environmental costs in the prices of goods and services. b) Subsidies and markets Engage in carbon trading, schemes for offsetting nature, and payments for ecosystem services. Support fair trade and companies with sustainable production models that provide services and products that foster societal well-being. c) Investments Support shifts in investment towards those needed to achieve the SDGs, and away from unsustainable industries, such as fossil fuels.3. Transform food, water and energy systems to meet growing human needs in an equitable, resilient and environmentally friendly manner a) Access Support and engage in local production and distribution systems for healthy food, safe water and clean energy. b) Food and water Consider what constitutes a healthy diet and also reduces environmental damage. Adopt sustainable practices in community-based and small-scale food production. Purchase sustainably produced food and reduce waste. Reduce wasting water, and collect rainwater and use grey water. c) Energy Support community-based energy production. Reduce energy consumption and chose clean energy when possible.1. Address Earth's environmental emergencies and human well-being together a) Synergies Develop analytical tools, including plausible futures models, using exploratory, target-seeking and policy-screening scenarios that account for the complex interlinkages between environment and development. Further develop observational programs. Engage in national and international scientific assessments. Develop environmental education programs for all age groups. Raise public awareness through public engagements, editorials, social media. b) Climate change Assess the impact of climate change on socio-economic sectors, nature and human health at all scales. Assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of different mitigation and adaptation policies and technologies. c) Biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation Assess the impact of multiple drivers on biodiversity and ecosystem degradation, and the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of conservation and restoration activities, including nature-based solutions. d) Health and well-being Promote education, information and awareness of One Health approaches. Assess interactions among environmental issues and their impacts on socioeconomic sectors and human health. Assess the implications of chemicals for human health and the environment, and develop health surveillance and monitoring systems, and approaches to prevent disease outbreaks, including pandemics. Assess the mental health implications of green and blue infrastructure in urban environments. e) Cities and settlements Support sustainable urban planning and development, including the use of nature-based solutions. Promote education, information and awareness on sustainable cities and settlements and their importance for human health.2. Transform economic and financial systems so they lead and power the shift toward sustainability a) Accounting for nature Further develop the framework for natural capital accounting and the relevant databases. Assess the costs and benefits of mitigating and adapting to climate change, loss of biodiversity and ecosystem degradation, land degradation, and air and water pollution at a range of spatial scales. Assess the implications of reforming measures and models of economic growth. Promote education, information and awareness on sustainable economic and financial systems. b) Subsidies and markets Assess the environmental and distributional social impacts of reductions in harmful subsidies, and the reallocation of these resources to support sustainable consumption and production. c) Investments Assess the environmental and social impacts of switching investments from unsustainable activities such as fossil fuels to sustainable activities.3. Transform food, water and energy systems to meet growing human needs in an equitable, resilient and environmentally friendly manner a) Access Help develop and monitor systems and networks to produce and distribute clean water and energy and nutritional food. Support the development of certification processes. b) Food and water Promote education, information and awareness on sustainability within agriculture-fisheries-forestry-water-energy systems. Assess the implications of environmental degradation on agriculture and water resources. Develop temperature, drought, pest and salinity resistant crops. Assess how to reduce the environmental footprint of agriculture. Facilitate the conservation and sustainable use of genetic resources. Develop water purification and desalination technologies. c) Energy Develop low-carbon production and use technologies, and assess how to overcome the barriers to market penetration of these technologies.Executive Summary1. Address Earth's environmental emergencies and human well-being together a) Synergies Inform all actors about the relationships between environment and development issues. Help hold societal actors accountable for their environmental promises, commitments and responsibilities. Support campaigns for meaningful actions to address environmental degradation. Counter disinformation and promote environmentally responsible social norms. b) Climate change Highlight the implications of climate change for people and nature, and the opportunities for adaptation and mitigation. c) Biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation Highlight the importance of biodiversity for human prosperity and well-being and the options for its conservation and restoration. d) Health and well-being Spread understanding and awareness of One Health approaches.Support campaigns for meaningful transformations in the health sector. e) Cities and settlements Document the impact on people and nature of unsustainable systems in urban areas and support campaigns for transformations in how cities and settlements are planned and designed, including the supply of essential services.2. Transform economic and financial systems so they lead and power the shift toward sustainability a) Accounting for nature Raise awareness of how current economic models and performance measures as well as the price of some goods and services fail to fully account for natural capital and environmental costs, and how this skews investment toward unsustainable activities. Support campaigns for meaningful transformations in economic and financial systems. b) Subsidies and markets Inform the public and other actors of the adverse consequences of fossil fuel and agricultural subsidies that lead to environmental damage, and explore the impact of redirecting the financing of subsidies to sustainable activities. c) Investments Highlight government spending and private sector investments that are unsustainable and those which are sustainable.Humanity has been grappling with a growing number of environmental challenges of increasing severity ever since the Stockholm Conference in 1972. The decision to hold what became the first in a series of decadal conferences on sustainable development was taken by the General Assembly of the United Nations (UN) in 1969. 1 The Stockholm Conference identified the environment as a challenge needing a UN system-wide response and resulted in the establishment of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) to help spearhead and coordinate the effort. 2 Governments have since put in place a number of specific multilateral environmental agreements and instruments, some of which address issues largely unknown in 1972, such as the depletion of the ozone layer and climate change. 3 Environmental challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution have become increasingly severe. For example, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has compared key impacts and risks of global warming across sectors and regions to people, economies and ecosystems for selected natural, managed and human systems through a sequence of science-based assessments (figure 1.1). The more recent assessments find that the risks kick in at lower temperature increases than the earlier ones did, and that the reasons for concern about climate change have increased over time.Science in interaction with policy has played a key role in identifying emerging environmental issues and providing the evidence base needed to address them. International environmental cooperation has developed an elaborate science-policy interface, including intergovernmental assessments co-designed and co-produced by independent experts interacting with government representatives and stakeholders. International assessments have established a foundation of shared knowledge that has often gone hand in hand with the development of international actions to curb environmental decline. A prominent example is the international effort to restore the life-protecting ozone layer in the upper atmosphere. Stratospheric ozone depletion was first hypothesized in 1974 and prompted a series of disco-veries showing that human-produced substances were to blame (figure 1.2). An elaborate interplay between science and policy resulted in the Montreal Protocol, which initiated the phasing out of ozone-depleting substances so that the ozone layer could start to recover, as detected in 2014. How science and policy interacted on this issue is detailed in Section 3. Advanced science-policy processes are key to generating actions needed to address more complex problems such as climate change and biodiversity loss. 1974 1985 1988 2014 1985 -1989 1995 -1996 activities. Section 3 explores how the world is currently failing to meet almost all of its targets on limiting environmental decline. Section 4 analyses how an array of deepening and mutually reinforcing environmental risks now threatens human well-being and the achievement of the SDGs. In Part II, the report urges the world to respond to the planetary emergency by transforming people's relationship with nature and with each other. Section 5 analyses how this daunting goal of a fundamental, system-wide change in the technological, economic and social organization of society can be achieved. Section 6 then assesses how the Earth's environmental emergencies should be addressed together to achieve sustainability. Section 7 moves on to examine how the economic and financial systems can be transformed to lead and power the shift to a sustainable future, and then explores how food, water and energy systems can be transformed to meet growing human needs in an equitable, resilient and environmentally friendly manner. Actions to reverse environmental decline in order to reduce the threats it poses to human health and well-being are addressed in Section 8. It also examines the environmental dimensions of promoting peaceful societies before addressing how cities and communities could become more sustainable. Finally, Section 9 sets out the roles and responsibilities that actors in the public and private sphere should assume if transformation is to succeed. It makes clear that humanity needs to take ingenuity and cooperation to a whole new level in order to achieve the sustainable development that will safeguard people and the planet in both the immediate and distant future. People rely on nature for livelihoods, prosperity, health and well-being. This section lays out the many ways in which people depend on nature, including through the provision of resources, the cycling of materials and the regulation of environmental conditions, and the many non-material contributions that nature makes to a good quality of life. It assesses how current economic and financial systems fail to account for society's dependence on the environment. The section then explores the underlying social and economic dynamics driving the human activities that directly degrade the environment through appropriation of space, modification of life, production, extraction, consumption, pollution and waste disposal.Human survival and well-being rests on the Earth and its ecosystems, and though the benefits of nature are received by all, the burden of environmental decline is unjustly distributed. Humans depend on the Earth's finite space and resources as well as its capacity to regenerate renewable resources, absorb waste and sustain life. The Earth provides humanity with clean water and air, 1 a protective stratospheric 2The current mode of development degrades the Earth's finite capacity to sustain human well-being I. Transforming nature puts human well-being at risk ozone layer, 2 a stable global climate and many other critical benefits. Human dependence on Earth and its ecosystems is often exposed when human systems degrade or surpass the planet's capacity to sustain prosperity. The growing use of land, freshwaters, coasts, oceans and natural resources such as fossil fuels, food crops, timber and aquatic foods have fuelled economic, technological and social advances (see figure 2.2). 3 However, human use of space and resources leaves less room for other living beings, and disposal of waste surpasses the Earth's absorptive capacity (see Section 3). The consequences, as this report shows, are devastating for human well-being and unjust (see Section 4). The benefits of nature have accrued unequally, and the burden of environmental decline is often disproportionately borne by poor and vulnerable communities. 4,5 Nature provides both material and non-material benefits crucial to human well-being and regulates Earth system functions that secure liveable conditions and protect people from harm. Many benefits derived from nature flow from interactions between people and the environment. Nature provides food, medicines, fibre, materials and energy and, with the aid of human inputs the production of many of these goods has increased over the past 50 years. 6 Nature also provides inspiration and learning, physical and psychological experiences, a sense of place and supports human identities. 7 The diversity of nature maintains humanity's ability to choose alternatives in the face of an uncertain future; for example, wild species might be domesticated as new crops. 8 In addition, natural processes modulate and maintain Earth systems, thereby providing a stable climate, mitigating natural hazards such as floods and fires, maintaining air and water quality, and supporting biological productivity. 9 Food production, for example, depends not only on food plants themselves but on many contributions from nature, including animal pollination, maintenance of soil fertility and water holding capacity and genetic diversity to withstand environmental changes such as increased temperatures or pests and disease (see Section 4). 10 Human well-being, now and in the future, depends on a healthy planet, achieved by avoiding climate change, pollution of air and water, degradation of land, water and oceans, and erosion of life on Earth. A changing climate, a degraded ozone layer, pollution and the degradation of ecosystems threaten human health, infrastructure and the many benefits that nature provides to people. 11 Nature itself is critical in mitigating these impacts, though in doing so its integrity is threatened. For example, oceans and land ecosystems have absorbed roughly 50 per cent of total human carbon dioxide emissions, but in so doing the oceans have acidified, negatively affecting ocean ecosystems that many people depend on, 12 and the persistence of natural carbon sinks are themselves uncertain due to climate change 13,14 and other drivers (see Section 2.3). 15 Sustaining the flow of benefits from nature increasingly depends on avoiding further loss of biodiversity. 16 For example, biodiversity in agricultural systems, including species and genetic variability, reduces vulnerability to stresses and shocks, in part by increasing the choices available to producers. 17 Avoiding land degradation will benefit billions of people by maintaining crop yields and other benefits of nature. 18 A healthy planet is a prerequisite and foundation for long-term prosperity, human health and well-being and for the achievement of the 2030 Agenda.The aggregate value of nature is often difficult to quantify because people value nature and its contributions to quality of life and cultural integrity in many different ways. 19 Groups with different culture, history, experience, education, income or other factors may use and value nature quite differently. 20 People experience the value of nature through their physical and mental health and as social, cultural and holistic well-being. Gross Domestic Product fails to fully account for the benefits people get from nature and the costs of its degradation. The standard measure of economic performance, gross domestic product (GDP), only measures the value of market transactions and therefore excludes much of the value of nature's contribution to human well-being. GDP excludes the value of ecosystem functions that regulate environmental conditions and the value of non-material benefits related to spiritual or cultural values. It also excludes measures of negative externalities associated with the depletion and destruction of nature. GDP measures current income but does not show whether that income is sustainable. Supporting current income through depletion of natural capital is not sustainable.Inclusive wealth is a better measure of sustainable prosperity. Rising GDP overstates human progress because it does not account for declines in natural capital. Maintaining or enhancing inclusive wealth (also known as weak sustainability) gives future generations the possibility to be at least as well off as the current generation. 26 Between 1990 and 2014, the annual growth rate in GDP for a set of 135 countries was almost double the increase in inclusive wealth (3.4 per cent versus 1.8 per cent). 27 Yet even this comparison only partially reflects the loss of nature's contributions over this period.Natural capital provides contributions to human well-being for which there may not be substitutes. Maintaining stocks of critical natural capital for which there are no substitutes is necessary for sustainability (also known as strong sustainability). 28 For example, the natural processes integral to growing food cannot be replaced. Even where substitutes for natural capital exist, they may be limited and costly. For example, biodiversity often reduces the need for food and agricultural producers to rely on costly or environmentally harmful external inputs. Similarly, high-quality drinking water can be provided through ecosystems that filter pollutants, through human-engineered water treatment facilities, or through hybrid solutions such as constructed wetlands and greywater treatment. Coastal flooding from storm surges can be reduced by coastal mangroves or by dikes and sea walls. Where limited or no substitutes for natural capital are available, policymakers can set science-based standards for environmental sustainability and adopt measures to ensure that these standards are met. This approach has been adopted for climate change, biodiversity loss and protection of the stratospheric ozone layer.Markets do not provide sufficient reward for businesses to invest in conserving or restoring natural capital. Businesses often find it unprofitable to invest in natural capital because they bear the costs but are not able to capture fully the benefits of conserving or restoring natural capital that accrue to wider society. The lack of investment results in natural capital's continued decline.Market prices fail to internalize environmental costs, magnifying environmental harm. Business and consumers often fail to pay the full costs of producing and consuming goods and services. For example, production and use of fossil fuels causes climate change, air pollution, destruction of habitat, ocean acidification and other environmental costs that are borne by society as a whole. Failure to pay for external costs encourages overproduction and overconsumption of environmentally harmful goods and services and discourages shifts towards more environmentally friendly substitutes such as renewable energy.Subsidies to environmentally destructive industries increase environmental degradation and its costs to people. Subsidies to fossil fuels, non-sustainable agriculture and fishing, non-renewable energy, mining and transportation exceed US$5 trillion annually. Globally, fossil fuel subsidies alone have been estimated at US$4.7 trillion (6.3 per cent of global GDP) in 2015 and are projected at US$5.2 trillion (6.5 per cent of GDP) in 2017. 29 In 2017-2019, the net transfers to the agricultural sector in 54 countries was more than US$600 billion per year. 30 These subsidies distort market outcomes and result in greater environmental degradation.Removing harmful subsidies would improve both economic and environmental outcomes.The failure to recognize the true costs of resource use or the value of waste reduction impedes movement towards a sustainable and circular economy. Failure to include the full costs of environmentally harmful activities skews investment away from sustainable solutions that involve the restoration of nature, development of renewable energy, more efficient use of resources, the reuse of materials and other characteristics of a circular economy. In a circular economy, the by-products of production or consumption becomes the raw material for other products. 31 A circular economy eases the pressure on natural resources and reduces waste and the costs of disposal. The current economic system does not provide effective incentives to reduce resource use, reuse materials or reduce waste, thereby slowing progress towards a circular economy.Human activities are changing the Earth's ecosystems and climate and leaving a geological signature so significant that the current geological epoch may be named the Anthropocene. I,32 These changes in the Earth system are driven by an array of underlying causes anchored in socioeconomic dynamics, the indirect drivers of environmental change, which The number of people on Earth has more than doubled over the last 50 years but the growth rate is projected to slow.The world population has grown from 3.7 billion people in 1970 to an estimated 7.8 billion in 2020 (see figure 2.2 panel a.i). 33 Although the population growth rate is projected to slow, the total population is expected to continue expanding in most regions. Based on a range of future fertility, mortality, migration and education assumptions, population projections used in existing assessments vary between 8.5 billion and 10.0 billion people by 2050 and between 6.9 billion and 12.6 billion people by 2100 (figure 2.2 panel a.i). 34,35,36,37,38,39 The largest uncertainty is the speed of the fertility transition, with low population projections resulting from a relatively rapid drop in fertility rates, though drops in fertility rates have a lag time The fastest growth is projected for non-metallic materials, reflecting additional needs for buildings and infrastructure. 62 Increased material consumption is putting further pressure on an already stressed environment, as the decreases in the Living Planet Indexes indicates (see figure 2.2 panel b).Production, marketing and consumer choices have driven changes in energy and agriculture systems involving a significant and ongoing rise in the use of natural resources. Economic growth has been fuelled by an increase in global primary energy production of more than 270 per cent over the last 50 years. While the share of renewable energy is increasing, fossil fuels are still the source of more than 80 per cent of primary energy and continue to drive climate change (figure 2.5). 63 Innovations, marketing and changes in consumer preferences shape production systems, including that for food. There has been a shift to-wards more meat-intensive diets and increases in material consumption among those in society who can afford it. The extent to which diets shift is a key variable in how much food is required by 2050. Between 2015 and 2050, demand for agricultural products (including wood, grass and fodder, food, feed and energy crops) is projected to increase by 30-80 per cent (SSP1-3), while primary energy demand is expected to rise by 80-130 per cent (SSP1-5) (figure 2.2 panel a.iii). 64 Future developments in demand for energy and materials are also sensitive to economic growth and structure, while agricultural demand is more directly affected by population growth. 65 Technology can yield important efficiency gains but is not a panacea for unsustainable resource use. Technological innovation and efficiency gains can reduce the environmental footprint of human activities. For example, energy efficiency increased by an estimated 12 per cent between 2000 and 2018. 66 However, growth in consumption due to reduced cost to consumers, sometimes called the rebound effect may offset efficiency gains. 67 Structural shifts may also offset efficiency gains. Material productivity has not improved globally since the year 2000 due to structural shifts in production towards economies with low material productivity. 68 Although the assessed SSPs show some decoupling of resource use from economic output (for example, in improved energy, water and nutrient-use efficiency and increasing agricultural yields) they fall short of offsetting rising demand driven by increases in population and per capita income. 69 Massively expanded global trade is exporting environmental footprints and distancing consumers from their impacts on the climate and biodiversity. Global trade has grown by nearly ten times in the last 50 years. 70 Ever-more distant consumers are shifting the environmental burden of consumption and production across regions. 71 Assessment of the \"upstream resource requirements\" of trade (that is, the additional resources used in the country of origin for producing traded goods but left behind as wastes and emissions) reveals that resource-intensive processes have shifted from high-income importing countries to low-income exporting countries, with a corresponding shift in associated environmental burdens. 72Human-caused direct drivers of environmental change are now a dominant force shaping the Earth. To satisfy growing demands, people use an ever-increasing fraction of the Earth's land, freshwater and oceans for the production and extraction of food, fibre, energy and minerals as well as for industrial facilities, infrastructure and settlements. Humans and farm animals have become the dominant species among all mammals on Earth. One estimate of the combined biomass II of mammals on Earth shows that the human population constitutes about a third and livestock nearly two thirds, while wild mammals, from whales to mice, amount to 92 Natural sinks today are only able to absorb around half of all carbon dioxide emissions, more or less equally split between terrestrial ecosystems and the ocean. Increased uptake of carbon dioxide is causing harmful ocean acidification. 93,94 In order to limit warming to well below 2°C, net global emissions from human activities need to reach zero or even become negative by the middle of the century. 95 Disposal, release and leaks of chemicals, nutrients and waste are driving environmental declines, especially in aquatic ecosystems. Pollution is regarded as the third most important driver of biodiversity loss in freshwater and the fourth in terrestrial and marine systems (see figure 3.1). Up to 400 million tons of heavy metals, solvents, toxic sludge and other industrial wastes are dumped annually into the world's waters, and fertilizers entering coastal ecosystems have produced dead zones. 96 Marine plastic pollution has increased tenfold since 1980, constituting 60 to 80 per cent of marine debris, and is found in all oceans at all depths and concentrates in the ocean currents. Marine plastics cause ecological impacts from entanglement and ingestion and can also act as a vector for invasive species and pollutants. 97,98,99 This section examines the state of the Earth from six perspectives, each relating to a cluster of international agreements: climate change; biodiversity loss; land degradation; air pollution; chemicals in the biosphere; and the depletion of stratospheric ozone. It demonstrates how society is failing to meet most of the internationally agreed environmental and sustainable development goals and targets relating to these topics. It concludes with a subsection showing how these major environmental challenges are linked to one another, and therefore why their collective solution requires a coordinated approach.The future is not entirely bleak. Multilateral cooperation and actions by individual nations, industries and households have yielded positive results, albeit insufficient to date. In general, these successes are not keeping pace with the growing negative ecological consequences of expanding human activities. If humanity continues on this path, the environment will keep changing for the worse, and this decline will contribute to conflicts, a reduction in the quality of human life and deteriorating prospects for most other lifeforms on the planet. Almost all of the Earth system and human system processes involved in the dramatic changes observed over the past century contain time lags of years to centuries. This imparts an inertia to the changes observed and reinforces the urgency with which people must act. There is a high risk that systems will cross thresholds beyond which change accelerates and becomes effectively impossible to reverse.Human activities have already caused the Earth's surface to warm by more than 1°C since the industrial period of 1850-1900. 1,2 Warming substantially greater than the global average is being experienced in most land regions: up to twice as large for hot extremes in mid-latitudes and more than three times larger in the cold season in the Arctic. 3 The increased atmospheric warming has led to more frequent and inten-Society is failing to meet most of its commitments to limit environmental damage se heavy precipitation events at global scale, but also to an increase in the frequency and intensity of droughts in some regions. 4,5 The additional warming has also led to Arctic sea ice retreat, permafrost thaw, and to melting of glaciers and ice sheets, which together with the thermal expansion of the oceans, have resulted in accelerating sea level rise. 6 Non-climatic drivers such as land subsidence, partly human-caused, have also played an important role in increasing vulnerability to sea level rise. Human-induced climate change has led to increases in the intensity and frequency of many extreme events, in particular hot extremes in all land regions, heavy precipitation in several regions and droughts in some regions. 7,8 In many regions, changing patterns of precipitation and the melting of snow and ice are altering the volume and seasonal timing of water flows in rivers, affecting both the quantity and quality of water resources, and the potential occurrence of peak flow events. Climate zones are shifting, including expansion of arid zones and contraction of polar zones. 9The heat-trapping effect of atmospheric greenhouse gases will persist for centuries to millennia, 10 and the resultant continued increase in global temperature will have large adverse consequences. There is inertia in the climate system. While some changes in the natural system, such as ocean acidification, can be detected almost immediately and can be clearly attributed to anthropogenic influence, other effects, such as sea level rise, will gradually but inexorably reveal themselves over the next several centuries. They are equally attributable to climate change, but the connection is less obvious to non-scientific observers because of the delay. Ice loss from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets is already contributing to sea level rise. 11 The unstable retreat of some Antarctic and Greenland glaciers may further accelerate sea level rise, 12 possibly abruptly. Mass loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet could be irreversible in the foreseeable future. 13 Risks of biodiversity loss and extinction increase greatly both for terrestrial and marine species as warming increases, with large increases for warming levels between 1.5 and 2°C (see Section 3.2) and further increases in risk beyond 2°C warming. Ocean warming, acidification and deoxygenation, permafrost degradation, and the extinction of species are phenomena that are highly relevant to human societies and ecosystem integrity but are effectively irreversible on century time scales. 14,15 Other effects, such as marine heatwaves and the retreat of Arctic sea ice, may be reversible over a period of decades to centuries (table 6.1) if the drivers of warming are reversed. Widespread disappearance of Arctic near-surface permafrost is projected to occur this century, 2-66 per cent of the area is at risk under low emission scenarios, and 30-99 per cent under high emission scenarios, releasing as much as 240 gigatonnes of carbon to the atmosphere, further accelerating climate change. Permafrost melting dries out the soil in some places, results in flooding in other places, and causes damage to infrastructure. 16 Rising concern about the climate has led to the Paris Agreement and other international accords to curb greenhouse gas emissions. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), signed in 1992, 17 led to the Kyoto Protocol in 1997, 18 the first coordinated attempt to limit greenhouse gas emissions. The subsequent Paris Agreement of 2015 was the result of several years of intensive international efforts to reach an agreement between all countries on limiting climate change. It includes the aim of \"holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.\" In the light of different national circumstances, the Paris Agreement calls for \"rapid reductions\" of emissions to be achieved \"on the basis of equity, and in the context of sustainable development and efforts to eradicate poverty.\" 19 The connections between eradicating poverty and reducing inequality and addressing climate change are embedded in the sustainable development goals (SDGs, see Section 4).Despite growing awareness and alarm about climate change, greenhouse gas emissions have continued to rise. Emissions of greenhouse gases increased from the equivalent of around 30 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide (GtCO2e) in 1970 to around 55 GtCO2e in 2019. 20 In the absence of vigorous mitigation measures and policies, most projections show further increases in greenhouse gas emissions in the future, driven by increasing fossil fuel use, land-use changes and other human activities.If society continues on its current emissions pathway, it will miss the target of keeping warming to well below 2°C, let alone that of stabilizing global warming at 1.5°C, and be on course for warming of more than 3°C. Taken together, the national climate mitigation pledges (known as Nationally Determined Contributions) made to date fall far short of the reductions needed to achieve the goals set under the Paris Agreement. Current pledges are more consistent with scenarios that lead to a warming well in excess of 3°C by the latter part of the century. 21 Many countries are failing to achieve even the modest emissions reductions goals they set for themselves. 22 Unless major emissions reductions are achieved by 2030, any chance of stabilizing global warming at 1.5°C will be lost. 23 Typical scenarios aimed at holding warming well below 2°C or even to 1.5°C typically show a 25-50 per cent reduction compared to 2010 (see also Section 6.1). 24 Scenarios in which warming temporarily exceeds the Paris Agreement goals around mid-century before falling rapidly depend heavily on the development of carbon dioxide removal technologies, whose ability to capture and store carbon dioxide at scale is as yet unproven and could lead to unintended negative impacts on biodiversity and food production. 25,26 In 2020, greenhouse gas emissions have shown a temporary drop as a result of the COVID-19 crisis. Carbon dioxide emissions could decrease by about 7 per cent in 2020 (range 2-12 per cent) compared with 2019 emission levels due to COVID-19, with a smaller drop expected in overall emissions as other greenhouse gases are likely to be less affected. However, atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases continue to rise. Studies indicate that the biggest changes have occurred in transport, as some COVID-19 restrictions were targeted to limit mobility, though reductions have also occurred in other sectors. 27 Long-term impacts on emissions are uncertain. The stimulus packages announced by governments to support economic recovery may have a strong impact on long-term emissions, leading to either lower emissions (if investments are combined with decarbonization strategies) or higher emissions (if investments are mostly made in greenhouse gas-intensive technologies).Climate change amplifies existing risks and creates new risks for natural and human systems. 28,29,30,31,32,33 Restricting global warming to 1.5°C with no or limited overshoot avoids many additional risks compared to a stabilization at 2°C, including reducing the risk of some irreversible impacts. 34 At 2°C of warming and higher, the likelihood and magnitude of impacts rises steeply. For example, substantial further increases in hot temperature extremes in most inhabited land regions are projected at global warming of 2°C or more compared to warming of 1.5°C. 35 There would also be further increases in heavy precipitation in several regions, and a higher probability of drought and precipitation deficits in some regions. 36 Global mean sea level rise is projected to be around 10 centimetres less by the end of the twenty-first century in a 1.5°C warmer world compared to a 2°C warmer 68 3. Society is failing to meet most of its commitments to limit environmental damage Terrestrial ecosystems world. The probability of a sea ice-free Arctic Ocean during summer is substantially higher at 2°C compared to 1.5°C of global warming. The risks to ocean and terrestrial ecosystems, including the number of species at risk of accelerated extinction, increase more than proportionally to the change in global mean temperature; at 2°C, the number of species at risk is more than 30 per cent higher than for 1.5°C, and higher temperature increases further magnify the threats (see Sections 3.2 and 3.7).Worldwide, biodiversity continues to decline at an alarming and accelerating rate. The absolute abundance of wild organisms has decreased over the past half-century, typically by about half across many groups, including birds, mammals and insects. Hotspots of rare and endemic species, which account for a disproportionate fraction of global biodiversity, have on average suffered greater declines in ecosystem structure and biotic integrity than other areas. The global rate of species extinction is already at least tens to hundreds of times higher than the average rate over the past 10 million years and is accelerating. Over 1 million of the estimated 8 million plant and animal species on Earth are at substantially increased risk of extinction in the coming decades and centuries as a direct or indirect consequence of human activities. Only a quarter of their original habitat is largely still functioning in a semi-natural way, and more than a third of terrestrial global plant production is now appropriated by humans for their own use and the use of domesticated species. 37 Climate change exacerbates other threats to biodiversity (see Section 3.7). Many terrestrial, freshwater and marine species have shifted their geographic ranges, seasonal activities, migration patterns, abundances and species interactions in response to climate change, and this trend will continue. 38 Half of all warm-water coral reefs have already been lost due to such combined effects. 39 A third of marine fish stocks have declined as a consequence of overharvesting. 40 Fertilisers entering coastal ecosystems have produced more than 400 ocean \"dead zones\" with a total area greater than 245,000 km² -more than the land area of the United Kingdom. 41 Widespread changes in organismal traits and reductions in genetic diversity are also evident. The diversity of organisms is in decline in both natural and managed environments (such as agricultural landscapes), with negative consequences for their productivity and resilience in the face of stress. The world's major ecosystems vary in both the intensity of the change-inducing factors they face and their ability to withstand them. Some, including arctic ecosystems and tropical coral reefs, are thought to be close to collapse in the form of large-scale regime shifts. 42 The Global Biodiversity Outlook 5Progress towards elements of each target 3.2. Assessment of progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets None of the goals in the international agreements intended to slow the rate of biodiversity loss have been fully met, including those in the strategic plan for biodiversity 2011-2020 and its Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Across six international agreements 43 whose objectives include slowing or reversing biodiversity loss, only one in five of the strategic objectives and goals are on track to be achieved. Nearly a third of the goals are not being met or in some cases even becoming further out of reach. 44 For example, none of the targets agreed under the CBD in 2010 (known as the \"Aichi Biodiversity Targets\") were fully met by the target deadline of 2020. One assessment of progress found partial progress in just four of the 20 targets. 45 A subsequent assessment that also took into account reports by countries implementing (not used by IPBES), green indicates good progress and that the element has been or is likely to be achieved by 2020, yellow indicates that moderate progress has been made towards the element but that it has not been achieved, red indicates poor progress or no significant change in the element, and purple indicates that the trends are moving away from achieving the element (not used by IPBES). In cases where the element could not be assessed due to insufficient information, the segment is grey. In the left hand column: \"Drivers\" refers to Strategic Goal A on underlying causes of biodiversity loss; \"Pressures\" refers to Strategic Goal B on the direct pressures on biodiversity; \"Status\" refers to Strategic Goal C on improving the status of biodiversity; \"Benefits\" refers to Strategic Goal D on enhancing benefits from biodiversity; and \"Implementation\" refers to Strategic Goal E on enhancing implementation.Source: IPBES 2019a, GA SPM, Figure SPM.6; CBD 2020a, GBO-5 SPM the targets concluded that six of the targets were partially achieved 46 (see figure 3.2). Areas of progress included increases in the proportion of land and oceans designated as protected areas and improved international financial flows to developing countries. Little or no progress has been made on others, including the elimination of harmful subsidies. 47 Both analyses show that there has been moderate or poor progress for most of the targets aimed at addressing the causes of biodiversity loss (see figure 3.1). As a result, the state of biodiversity overall continues to decline. Even though conservation actions have likely reduced the number of species becoming extinct by between two and four times, the number of species threatened with extinction continues to increase.There has been moderate or poor progress on maintaining genetic diversity of cultivated plants and their wild relatives, restoring ecosystem services and no progress overall in enhancing carbon storage. Some progress has been made in adopting policy responses and actions including raising awareness of the value of biodiversity, sharing benefits equitably, developing national action plans, and improving scientific understanding of the causes and consequences of biodiversity loss. 48 Lag times and system feedbacks mean that species can be committed to premature extinction decades before the last individuals actually die and that there is a high likelihood that ecosystem thresholds will be crossed, with large and negative consequences. It is estimated that more than half a million terrestrial species have insufficient habitat for their long-term survival, and are committed to early extinction, many within decades, unless their habitats are restored. 49 Deforestation could cross critical thresholds of fragmentation and area loss that undermine forest ecological integrity and ultimately human well-being. 50 Once the world is committed to warming greater than 2-3°C, most warm-water coral reefs will die, boreal forests will not reproduce, and ice-dependent ecosystems (such as permafrost, glacier-fed and seasonal coastal ice sheets) face collapse. Coral reefs are already dying as a result of a warmer world, whereas it will take many decades to see a significant reduction in the area of boreal forests (although leading indicators such as fire and diseases already show change), and centuries to millennia to see a complete destruction of ice-dependent ecosystems. 51,52 Biodiversity and the benefits it provides are set to decline further because of continued climate and land-use change.Most scenarios project ongoing and often accelerating loss of biodiversity (see figure 3.3) and of many of the regulating and cultural services it supports, largely due to projected changes in climate and continued changes in land use. 53 Ongoing changes in land use are inevitable due to evolving human needs and the effects of climate change, but they need not, in aggregate, lead to further degradation of a finite but essential resource. To recognize this point while still aiming to halt and then reverse land degradation, the concept of \"land degradation neutrality\" has been proposed by the UNCCD and is a target in SDG 15. It means that for every hectare newly degraded, a hectare of equal value somewhere else is restored from past degradation. 54 In 2020, less than a quarter of the global land surface still functions in a nearly natural way, with its biodiversity largely intact. This quarter is mostly located in dry, cold, or mountainous areas, and thus far has a low human population and has undergone little transformation. It also includes much of the terrestrial protected area network, currently covering 15 per cent of the land area. Of the remaining three quarters, a third (i.e. a quarter of the total land surface) has been radically transformed from its natural state. The original ecosystem has been replaced by croplands, plantations, planted pastures, infrastructure such as roads, railways, dams, canalized rivers, human settlements, industrial developments, waste dumps or active or abandoned mining lands. The rate of this transformation has accelerated since the middle of the twentieth century. The other two thirds (i.e. half of the total global land area) retains some level of natural processes and biodiversity but is strongly and increasingly human-dominated. It includes the rangelands of the world that are grazed mostly by domesticated livestock, the semi-natural forests from which wood and other products are harvested, and the freshwater systems where flows are altered by water use. 55 Land degradation has reduced productivity in more than 20 per cent of the global terrestrial area. 56,57 Wetlands are the most transformed and degraded ecosystem type. They have lost about 85 per cent of their area and much of their function. 58 Although land degradation is ubiquitous, its large and persistent impacts are only now being appreciated. Degradation occurs everywhere in the world, to varying degrees and in many forms, all of which compromise human well-being (see figure 3.4). The economic impact is large, and billions of lives are affected (see Section 4). However, land degradation has been present for so long, and in so many places, that it has often come to be thought of as the natural state or is conceived as an inevitable consequence of progress. Local species richness (N=3)Regional species richness (N=4) Biodiversity intactness (N=1) 0%-4% -8%-12%been an impediment to quantification of the issue (see box 3.1), 59 but in the past decade there has been a convergence on definitions that can be applied to all terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems, based on a long-term reduction in the capacity of the affected ecosystems to deliver benefits to people, now and in the future. Some definitions also include an accompanying reduction in the diversity, abundance, or health of nature. Of particular concern is degradation where ecological processes have been impaired to the point that the ecosystem is no longer able to recover -unaided, fully and in a reasonable time -once the causes of degradation have been alleviated. 60A useful distinction is between land transformation and land degradation. 61 Transformation may be legal or illegal, but it is usually intentional. The ecosystem is deliberately altered for the purpose of increasing the delivery of a particular benefit, or set of benefits to a group of people, often at the expense of other benefits, and almost always with a loss of biodiversity.For instance, a diverse, self-regenerating natural forest may be converted to a managed tree plantation, or a grassland into a cropland. In the developed world, transformation often occurred centuries ago, and is often assumed to be the natural and desired state.In Land degradation and transformation contributed around a quarter of greenhouse gas emissions in the last decade.Over half of these emissions derive from land transformation (particularly deforestation) and most of the remainder from the loss of soil carbon in cultivated land. Halting land transformation and degradation could contribute 6.6 (range 2-11) GtCO2e per year to greenhouse gas emission reductions between 2020 and 2050, and land restoration-related activities 63 could contribute a further 18.6 (range 1.8-35.5) GtCO2e per year over the same period, while simultaneously restoring ecological function and ecosystem services, and in some cases, biodiversity (see section 5). 64,65,66 The issue of land degradation is recognized as a global concern, but the approaches to addressing it have been inadequate and fragmented. The UNCCD specifically addresses degradation in drylands. There is no single conven-tion to protect forests, but several treaties address aspects of forest degradation, including the CBD, the UNFCCC, the International Tropical Timber Agreement and some of the rules of the World Trade Organization. Wetlands of international importance are protected under the Ramsar Convention. Sustainable Development Goal 15 (Life on Land) sets out to halt and reverse land degradation by 2030. This builds on the concept of land degradation neutrality, adopted by the UNCCD in 2015, also for achievement by 2030. These constitute the first comprehensive global targets relating to land degradation. There have been other implicit or explicit targets relating to particular aspects of degradation, such as combatting desertification, or soil degradation, or wetland loss. Many countries have national targets related to preventing or reversing land degradation, but in aggregate they have not been sufficient to meet international goals. Despite the agreed goal of halting land degradation, land degradation is projected to increase in the twenty-first century under all development scenarios (see Section 4). 67 Under scenarios where slowing land transformation is not a priority, the fraction of land remaining in a near-natural state is projected to be as little as 10 per cent by mid-century, while degraded land will reach over 20 per cent. The pace of land degradation depends strongly on the outcome of efforts to mitigate climate change (see Section 3.7). In particular, under scenarios where mitigation actions are weak and slow, degradation in arid lands and polar regions is projected to accelerate. Land-based climate mitigation actions can, if targeted at rehabilitation of degraded lands, achieve both climate and land restoration objectives, but the availability and productive potential of such lands is insufficient to supply more than a small part of the net carbon uptake needed by mid-century. If inappropriately applied, for instance by afforestation of lands not previously forested, or by reforestation using monocultures of species not native to the area under restoration, the co-benefits to land restoration will not be achieved, and net biodiversity harm could result. 68 3.4 Air pollution is not sufficiently reduced to protect human well-beingAir pollution is the biggest environmental risk factor contributing to the global burden of disease. 69,70 From a health perspective, the most important air pollutants are ground-level ozone and particulate matter, 71 both of which can also act as short-lived climate forcers. An estimated 90 per cent of the world's population lives in an area where annual average outdoor concentrations of the pollutant PM2.5 (fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 micrometres or less) exceeds WHO air quality guidelines. 72,73 Urban areas typically have high levels of pollution; of the 45 megacities with measurements in 2013, only four met the WHO guidelines for PM2.5. 74 Projected increases in urbanization have the potential to negatively impact on local and regional air quality.Nature contributes to the regulation of air quality but can be degraded in the process. 75 Nature improves air quality through the retention and detoxification of pollutants, though these processes (such as acidic deposition) affect terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems negatively. 76 Loss of biodiversity and ecosystem function, resulting from air pollution and other drivers such as land degradation and climate change, may compromise nature's contributions to moderating air pollution. 77,78,79 Ecosystems can also be sources of pollutants, such as from biomass burning, dust, biogenic volatile organic compounds, and nitrogen emissions, as well as ammonia and methane that contribute to secondary pollutants. These contribute interactively to ambient air pollution and many act as short-lived climate forcers. 80,81,82,83,84,85 Nature also helps prevent emissions of air pollutants, for instance in the way that vegetation modulates dust emissions from soil. 86 Climate-related factors interacting with land-use and land cover changes in many dryland areas have over the last few decades resulted in increased frequency and intensity of dust storms with negative impacts on air quality and human health. 87 The increased occurrence of wildfires as a result of climate change will negatively impact air quality and thus represent a growing health risk. 88 Natural or human-induced increases in the production and release of airborne allergens (pollen or fungal spores) and consequent upsurges in allergy-related respiratory ill health can make people more susceptible to air pollution impacts. 89 Releases of hazardous chemicals from environmental reservoirs such as soil, water and ice due to increasing temperatures are also projected to increase exposures and vulnerabilities for both people and ecosystems. 90 While there is no global agreement on limiting air pollution, international targets, regional agreements and national policies 91,92,93 aim to decrease air pollution and its negative impacts. The international targets with a bearing on air pollution are SDGs 3.9, 7.1 and 11.6 and Aichi Biodiversity Target 8. The Montreal Protocol and the Paris Agreement also impact air pollution; their implementation will affect air quality, both directly through changes in emissions and atmospheric chemistry, and indirectly by mitigating climate change and its subsequent impacts on air quality. 94,95 The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe's Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP) 96 is an example of a successful regional agreement that has led to marked improvements in air quality. In Europe, the abatement of pollutant emissions under CLRTAP has helped to increase average life expectancy by 12 months and decreased the exceedance of critical loads (i.e. the exposure ecosystems can sustain without being degraded) for acidification by a factor of 30 and nitrogen by a factor of three. 97 Progress on reducing air pollution is mixed, with air quality improving in high-income countries but continuing to degrade in low-income countries. 98,99,100,101,102,103 Globally, health impacts from exposure to ambient PM2.5 and ozone, and household PM2.5 have decreased significantly (by about 25 per cent) between 2006 and 2016. 104,105 However, these trends are highly variable from place to place. 106,107,108,109,110 For example, North America and Europe have seen decreases of about 75 per cent in sulphur dioxide emissions (which contribute to ambient sulphur dioxide concentrations and particulate matter pollution) since 1990, while increases have been seen elsewhere, including of 50 per cent in Asia. 111 The regional differences in progress towards targets are striking and cause for concern. Quantifying these trends in middle-and low-income countries is greatly hindered by lack of data. Large data gaps for quantifying and characterizing air pollution and its impacts can be addressed through actions that expand the knowledge base as well as improve monitoring and reporting; these include improving emission inventories, increasing sampling coverage of a range of pollutants and impacts, as well as improving availability and accessibility of data and information. 112,113 While air pollution levels are impacted by activities in many sectors, action to decrease emissions in the energy sector is critical to achieve air quality targets. 114 Energy production and use is the main source of anthropogenic emissions for many pollutants, accounting for 85 per cent of primary PM emissions and almost all of the emissions of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides. 115 Air quality related SDG targets will not be fully met with current energy policies alone, but rather a transformation of the energy sector is needed. 116,117 As air quality has linkages across sectors, more holistic and integrated assessments are needed to develop policies and interventions that avoid potential unintended trade-offs. 118,119,120 3.5 Chemicals and waste are not always managed safelyA wide range of hazardous human-produced chemicals are accumulating in the biosphere, in the environment in which humans live, and in the human food chain, which adversely affect ecosystems and human health. The production and use of chemicals are increasing (see figure 3.5).Hazardous and toxic chemicals have adverse effects on terrestrial and aquatic life. Large quantities of human-manufactured chemicals continue to be released to the air, water and soil. In many parts of the world, emissions and releases of hazardous chemicals are increasing. Not only do these emissions pose risks to human health and the environment, they also represent lost opportunities to realize economic benefits from repurposing the waste stream. Significant progress has been made in reducing releases of some chemicals of concern, including ozone-depleting substances (see Section 3.6) and some persistent organic pollutants.Global warming leads to the remobilization of some pollutants such as persistent organic pollutants due to melting glaciers and thawing permafrost. Atmospheric long-range transport of pollutants is responsible for their occurrence in remote areas. Supply chains involving trans-or inter-continental shipping of hazardous chemicals potentially increase the risk of their accidental release into the environment. 121The Millennium Development Goals set in 2002 to minimize the adverse impacts of chemicals and waste by 2020 will not be achieved. Solutions exist (see Section 5), but more ambitious worldwide action by all stakeholders is urgently required. There has been good progress in addressing the legacy of persistent organic pollutants, such as the pesticide DDT, under the Stockholm Convention, where a global monitoring programme has been in place for more than 10 years. The levels and trends of selected persistent organic pollutants in air and mother's milk are monitored around the globe. On several continents there has been a reduction in concentration of a range of persistent organic pollutants of high concern, even in remote areas. The levels of contaminants newly added to this convention, such as brominated and fluorinated chemicals, have not yet shown a decline. The results of the monitoring programme suggest that targeted regulations, including those that predated the convention in some regions, are working to reduce levels of persistent organic pollutants in the environment and in human populations. Effective regulatory actions at the global level since the entry into force of the Convention in 2004, particularly for listed persistent organic pollutants that are still commercially available, are expected to lower environmental concentrations in the long term. 122,123 Chemical-related multilateral agreements have improved the management of the whole life cycle of chemicals. Agreements including the Rotterdam, Stockholm and Basel Conventions address the life cycle of chemicals, including their sources, commerce (use), transport, and disposal. The Minamata Convention on mercury covers the entire life cycle of mercury and mercury-added products. A multi-stakeholder voluntary agreement known as the Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) addresses emerging policy issues and other concerns in global chemicals management such as: lead in paint; chemicals in products; hazardous substances within the life cycle of electrical and electronic products; nanotechnology and manufactured nanomaterials; endocrine-disrupting chemicals; environmentally persistent pharmaceutical pollutants; perfluorinated chemicals and the transition to safer alternatives; and highly hazardous pesticides. Work to strengthen the science-policy interface and prepare recommendations regarding the Strategic Approach and the sound management of chemicals and waste beyond 2020 are still ongoing. 124 3.6 Strong international coordinated action is restoring Earth's protective ozone layerHuman-made chemicals have caused the depletion of the ozone layer in the stratosphere, exposing people and other organisms to harmful ultraviolet radiation. The reduction in the concentration of ozone in the stratosphere, first detected in the late 1980s, is directly due to the release of humanmade chemical compounds including chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and bromine-containing halons. The impact of these ozone-depleting substances is manifest as an ozone \"hole\" above Antarctica and a thinning of the ozone layer in the Arctic and in mid-latitudes. This has increased the amount of ultraviolet radiation reaching the Earth's surface, which is harmful to both people and other organisms.Concern about the threat to the ozone layer prompted pioneering scientific research, assessments and international agreements to address a complex global environmental problem. Meetings of international experts beginning in 1979 125 produced the first of a series of in-depth scientific assessments of ozone depletion. 126 With the threat identified, UNEP formed an expert working group to develop a framework to protect the ozone layer. The resulting Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer was adopted by 21 countries in March 1985. 127 This Convention called for Parties to take measures to protect human health and the 1989 1991 1994 1998 2002 2006 environment from ozone depletion, but to also cooperate on scientific research and observations. The full scientific assessment report published in late 1985 was the first of its kind, in the sense of being international, comprehensive, peerreviewed, and including a summary for policymakers. 128 The summary noted the first evidence of the Antarctic ozone hole, albeit without an understanding of its cause. Two years later, the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer was adopted to control, at least partially, the production and consumption of ozone-depleting substances. It established technical committees and mandated scientific assessments every four years, starting in 1990. 129,130,131 Stratospheric ozone has begun to recover because of concerted international action. In the late 1980s, laboratory, field and modelling studies established the cause of the Antarctic ozone hole and mid-latitude ozone depletion. The scientific assessments since 1988 have provided the scientific foundation for strengthening the Montreal Protocol through a series of amendments and adjustments limiting the consumption and production of ozone-depleting substances. The levels of chlorine-and bromine-containing substances at the surface peaked in about 1995 and most are now steadily decreasing.It is now projected that the Antarctic ozone hole will disappear in the 2060s 132 (see figure 3.6).Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HFCs) used to replace some ozone-depleting substances have been shown to be potent greenhouse gases and subsequently controlled through international action. CFCs, which were widely used as refrigerants, propellants and solvents, have been replaced in some applications by hydrofluorcarbons (HFCs). The ozonedepleting CFCs were also potent greenhouse gases, hence eliminating their emission into the atmosphere was greatly beneficial for the climate system. While HFCs have a very small impact on ozone levels, they are also powerful greenhouse gases. Recognition of this unintended consequence led to the 2016 Kigali Amendment controlling the production and consumption of several HFCs. 133 As a result, their projected climate impact in 2100 has been reduced from 0.3-0.5°C to less than 0.05°C. 134Climate change, land-use change, land degradation, and air and water pollution act synergistically to cause pervasive, extensive and systemic damage to biodiversity and ecosystem services on land and in the ocean 135,136,137,138,139,140 (figure 3.9). Land-use change also affects the climate system through altered albedo, evaporation and plant transpiration. In regions with seasonal snow cover, such as boreal regions and some temperate regions, increased tree and shrub cover has a wintertime warming influence due to an increase in the solar radiation absorbed by the less reflective vegetation. 155 This means that afforestation can locally induce warming in these regions and thus counteract cooling associated with added carbon uptake from trees. Land-use changes can also induce local to regional cooling, for instance through increased evaporation of water and plant transpiration in regions with irrigation, 156 but the global effect is zero since the water re-condenses in the atmosphere, emitting the energy it absorbed during evaporation.Climate change and biodiversity loss jeopardize the health and productivity of land. Loss of biodiversity and vegetation cover accelerates soil erosion and land degradation (figure 3.9, dark pink arrow). Global warming has already led to shifts in climate zones in many parts of the world, including Increases in global mean surface temperature (GMST), relative to pre-industrial levels, affect processes involved in desertification (water scarcity), land degradation (soil erosion, vegetation loss, wildfire, permafrost thaw) and food security (crop yield and food supply instabilities). The literature was used to make expert judgements to assess the levels of global warming at which levels of risk are undetectable, moderate, high or very high. As part of the assessment, literature was compiled and data extracted into a summary table. A formal expert elicitation protocol (based on modified-Delphi technique and the Sheffield Elicitation Framework), was followed to identify risk transition thresholds in panel, including a multi-round elicitation process with two rounds of independent anonymous threshold judgement, and a final consensus discussion.Panel (a) indicates risks to selected elements of the land system as a function of global mean surface temperature. Links to broader systems are illustrative and not intended to be comprehensive. Risk levels are estimated assuming medium exposure and vulnerability driven by moderate trends in socioeconomic conditions broadly consistent with an SSP2 pathway. Red: Significant and widespread impacts/risks.Yellow: Impacts/risks are detectable and attributable to climate change with at least medium confidence. expansion of arid zones and contraction of polar zones. 157 In Sub-Saharan Africa, parts of Central and East Asia, and Australia, warming and reduced precipitation have contributed to desertification (figure 3.9, light purple arrow). 158 Loss of glacier mass and snow cover is higher with greater global warming. 159 Widespread near-surface permafrost thaw is projected to occur during the twenty-first century, with losses of 69 +20 per cent by 2100 in the absence of climate change mitigation, reducing to 24+16 per cent for high-mitigation scenarios. A regional-scale threshold between 1.5°C and 2°C of warming has been identified in the Mediterranean above which biome shifts unprecedented in the last 10,000 years and associated with extreme drought are projected. In Southern Africa, much greater water stress and increased drought are anticipated for warming above 1.5-2°C. 160,161 Globally, risks from water scarcity, wildfire damage and permafrost degradation are projected to be already high at 1.5°C; for warming of 3°C, risks arising from water scarcity, wildfire damage and vegetation loss become very high (figure 3.8a).Climate change risks to food security are expected to become increasingly severe with increased global warming.The risk is expected to become high between 1.2°C and 3.5°C of warming depending on socioeconomic development pathways, and very high risks could be incurred with only 2°C warming in some pathways. 162 At 3-4°C warming, very high risks of declines in low-latitude crop yields are expected whilst 4°C warming is considered catastrophic for food supply stability and access. 163 Rising carbon dioxide concentrations are projected to reduce the protein and micronutrient content of major cereal crops, which is expected to further reduce food and nutritional security. 164 Climate change, biodiversity loss and water pollution affect oceanic and coastal ecosystems. Without action to limit global warming, marine heatwaves, coupled with ocean acidification and loss of oxygen, will result in the crossing of critical thresholds in the ocean and in coastal systems, beyond which ecosystem functioning will be impaired (figure 3 heatwaves have already resulted in large-scale coral bleaching events at increasing frequency, causing worldwide reef degradation. Recovery is slow (more than 15 years), if it occurs at all. 165 There are many potential limits to adaptation in marine ecosystems, 166 and these limits are projected to be exceeded well before the end of the century in many coral reef environments, urban atoll islands and low-lying Arctic locations. Marine heatwaves are projected to become 50 times more frequent and 10 times more intense in the absence of strenuous climate change mitigation. 167 Ocean acidification, which inevitably results from increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, amplifies the adverse effects of warming, impacting the growth, development, calcification, survival and abundance of a broad range of species, from algae to fish. 168 Warm-water coral reefs are projected to decline by 70-90 per cent at 1.5°C warming and by more than 99 per cent at 2°C, 169,170 compromising food provision, tourism, coastal protection and the diversity of coral reef-associated species (figure 3.8b). Cold-water coral reefs, similarly highly biodiverse, are also projected to be harmed. Unless efforts to mitigate climate change are successful, by the end of the century the biomass of marine animals is projected to decline by 10-20 per cent and the maximum potential catch of fisheries by 20.5-24.1 per cent relative to 1986-2005. 171 In the Arctic, the chances of the sea being ice-free in September by the end of the century rise from about 1 per cent each year for stabilized global warming of 1.5°C, to 10-35 per cent for a stabilized 2°C increase. 172 A sea ice-free Arctic Ocean would disrupt the functioning of the Arctic ecosystem.Coastal ecosystems face high to very high risks unless climate change is halted. The risk of irreversible loss of many already declining coastal ecosystems, such as seagrass meadows and kelp forests, increases with further global warming (figure 3.8b). Increased salinization and hypoxia in estuaries contribute to their decline. 173 Global mean sea level is rising, with acceleration in recent decades due to increasing rates of ice loss from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets 174 as well as continued glacier mass loss and ocean thermal expansion, and is accompanied by increased wave heights in the Atlantic Ocean. 175 Irreversible loss of the Greenland ice sheet and instability in the West Antarctic ice sheet may occur between 1.5°C and 2°C. 176 A high risk of potential collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet is considered to exist for 2.5°C warming ( figure 1.1 (e)). Depending on the amount of sea level rise, 20-90 per cent of current coastal wetlands are projected to be lost by the end of the century, including mangrove forests and salt marshes (figure 3.8b). 177 Local sea levels that historically occurred once per century are projected to become at least annual events at most locations during the twenty-first century. 178 Extreme sea levels and coastal hazards will be exacerbated by projected increases in tropical cyclone winds and associated heavy rainfall. 179 Reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases typically also reduces air pollution. The greenhouse gases and aerosols responsible for anthropogenic climate change are in some cases also air pollutants, and even when they are not themselves toxic at ambient levels, they are often associated with chemicals that are. For instance, carbon dioxide is not poisonous at current elevated levels, but reducing carbon dioxide emissions from industrial processes typically reduces the emissions of gases that cause human and ecosystem health problems, including tropospheric ozone precursors. Similarly, methane is not toxic at normal levels, but combines with oxides of nitrogen emitted from industry and vehicles to form tropospheric ozone, which as a result frequently exceeds damage-causing levels. Particulate matter affects both the Earth's radiation balance and human health (see Section 3.4).Water pollution is a leading cause of the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services in freshwater and coastal aquatic systems (figure 3.1). Key water pollutants include excess nutrients, salts and sediments resulting from agriculture, human settlements and land degradation. Water pollution and air pollution are often linked, since diversion of waste from one pathway can simply displace it into another pathway. For instance, excess nitrogen in water is often removed by anaerobic denitrification, which results in emissions of nitrous oxide. The solution is to reduce nitrogen waste overall.Plastics and chemical waste entering the biosphere contributes to both biodiversity loss and to land degradation. The accumulation of plastics in the oceans and pesticide residues in soils and sediments are examples. On the other hand, plastic and other chemicals can reduce food waste through spoilage, and pesticides reduce the loss of crops before and after harvest. 180 Most human-created substances implicated in stratospheric ozone depletion are also greenhouse gases, as are some of the substances that replace them. While the state of stratospheric ozone is improving as a result of concerted international efforts to reduce the production and emission of ozone-depleting chemicals, a degree of depletion of this life-protecting layer will persist well into the middle of the twenty-first century (Section 3.6). This reduction in emissions also reduces the contributions of these gases to climate change. 181 The multiple interactions between environmental problems mean that uncoordinated single-issue solutions are inefficient and likely to fail. An integrated approach that addresses the underlying root causes of interlinked environmental problems and pays attention to unintended consequences of actions is both more cost-effective and more likely to be successful than treating the issues as if they were independent of one another. It further allows synergies to be identified and exploited, while steering away from the worst trade-offs.Where Section 2 showed people's dependence on the natural world and their role in shaping it, Section 3 concluded that, under current trends, internationally agreed environmental goals are unlikely to be achieved. People are changing the climate system, polluting air and water and using more land and marine resources than ever before. Life on Earth is rapidly eroding and nearly all of nature's regulating functions are in decline. This section discusses how environmental degradation, including climate change, loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services and pollution of air, land and water, undermines progress towards achieving the economic and social objectives of the SDGs. It explores risks to poverty and economic development (SDG 1 and SDG 8), to food and water security (SDG 2 and SDG 6), to human health (SDG 3), to reducing inequality (SDG 5 and SDG 10), to promoting peaceful and inclusive societies (SDG 16) and to cities and communities (SDG 11). Figure 4.1 provides an overview of selected environmental changes, as discussed in Section 3, and selected impacts on the SDGs, as discussed below.Ongoing and projected environmental degradation undermines progress towards the SDGs. In many countries in the Global South, poverty levels and thereby people's vulnerability to environmental degradation remain high (see Sections 2.3.1 and 4.1). Most scenarios project clear improvement over time in areas including reducing hunger (SDG 2), increasing access to safe drinking water and adequate sanitation (SDG 6) and increasing access to modern energy services (SDG 7), though not enough to meet the related SDG targets by 2030. 1 Trends in environmental degradation will make reaching these and other goals even more challenging (see figure 4.1). 2,3 Poor and vulnerable communities are most at risk from environmental threats and future generations will be more affected than the current. Poverty is increasingly concentrated in rural dryland areas of South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. 4 Socioeconomic developments, such as in population, trade, consumption and inequality, determine the vulnerability and exposure of people and thus related impacts on their well-being. For instance, a scenario with low population growth, reduced inequalities, land-use regulation, The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted human well-being, disrupted implementation towards many of the SDGs and, in some cases, turned back decades of progress. 7 In 2020, global per capita GDP is expected to decline by 4.2 per cent (SDG 8), pushing an estimated 71 million more people into extreme poverty (SDG 1) and resulting in hundreds of thousands of additional under-5 deaths (SDG 3). The disruption caused by the pandemic is also a threat to food security, with the World Food Programme estimating an almost doubling of the number of people facing acute food insecurity in 2020 compared to 2019 (SDG 2) (see Section 2.3.1). 8 Due to lockdowns, school closures have kept 90 per cent of all students out of school for some period of time (SDG 4) and, in some countries, cases of domestic violence have increased by 30 per cent (SDG 5). Poor and disadvantaged people have been affected most (SDG 10), while all these impacts can further threaten global peace and security (SDG 16). Purple: Very high probability of severe impacts/ risks and the presence of significant irreversibility or the persistence of climate-related hazards, combined with limited ability to adapt due to the nature of the hazard or impacts/risks.Red: Significant and widespread impacts/risks. Environmental changes are increasingly impacting economic development and employment (SDG 8). Changes in temperature and precipitation patterns, along with changes in extreme events such as heatwaves, heavy precipitation in several regions and droughts in some regions (Section 3.1), are already having an impact on human systems. 14 Key economic sectors being affected include tourism, energy systems and transportation. 15 In 2018 alone, damages from natural disasters, the vast majority of which were climaterelated (including droughts, fires, storms and floods), were estimated at US$155 billion. 16 Safe work activity and worker productivity during the hottest months of the year will be increasingly compromised with higher ambient temperatures and climate change. 17 Land degradation has already reduced productivity in 23 per cent of the global terrestrial area, 18 with economic losses as large as 5 per cent of total GDP being observed. 19 Over the past 50 years, the potential of nature to contribute to human well-being has declined in 14 of 18 major categories of contributions that were recently assessed. 20 These changes have decreased the flow of regulating and non-material benefits to people, resulting in a significant loss of non-market values. For example, loss of pollinators puts between US$235 billion and US$577 billion in annual global crop output at risk. 21 The costs of inaction on limiting environmental change far outweigh the costs of action. Though estimates of future damages to the economy from climate change are uncertain and exclude important categories of damages (e.g. loss of public goods and global commons) 22 global aggregate impacts are estimated to reach high levels with 2.5-3°C of warming (see figure 1.2). 23,24 By the end of the century, inaction on climate change could lead to a 15-25 per cent reduction in per capita output for 2.5-3°C of global warming, relative to a world that did not warm beyond 2000-2010 levels. 25 Estimates of economic damages associated with 2°C of warming reach US$69 trillion, 26 while an estimated US$15-38.5 trillion in economic damage could be avoided by limiting warming to 1.5°C. 27 The global health savings from reduced air pollution could be more than double the costs of implementing the Paris Agreement between 2020 and 2050. 28 Estimates of the costs of reducing emissions, though substantial, are far less than the estimates of damages. Cost estimates for limiting warming to less than 2°C are 2-6 per cent of global GDP in 2050, and 3-11 per cent in 2100. 29 Further delays in climate mitigation action increase the risk of escalating costs, lock-in of carbon-emitting infrastructure, stranded assets and reduced flexibility in future options for reducing emissions. 30 The loss of benefits that people get from nature are also costly. Some benefits, such as wild pollination, are irreplaceable, while for others substitution can be extremely expensive, such as the replacement of coastal mangroves with built flood protection infrastructure. 31 The diversity of nature also maintains humanity's ability to choose between alternative development options in the face of an uncertain future.The Earth's capacity to supply food and water weakens in the face of environmental decline (SDGs 2 and 6)Though food security has been improving, environmental changes and shocks threaten further progress in ending global hunger (SDG 2). After a period of reductions in the number of people affected by hunger, the world is now facing an alarming situation. In 2019, nearly 700 million people were estimated to be hungry (undernourished), up nearly 60 million in five years. This upward trend is partly due to increasing frequency of extreme weather events, altered environmental conditions and the associated spread of pests and diseases over the last 15 years. Such factors contribute to vicious circles of poverty and hunger, particularly when exacerbated by fragile institutions, conflicts, violence and the widespread displacement of populations. The economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic may add more than 80 million people to the total number of undernourished in the world in 2020.If recent trends continue, the number of people affected by hunger will surpass 840 million by 2030, which is far from the goal of ending hunger by 2030. 32 Current low levels of biodiversity (species and genetic variability) in agricultural systems increase their vulnerability to stresses and shocks (SDG 2.5), and biodiversity loss, land degradation and climate change jeopardize land productivity, potentially altering the suitability of vast areas for agricultural production and human habitation. 33 Billions of people face the challenges of inadequate access to drinking water and sanitation, increasing water pollution and water scarcity (SDG 6). In 2017, around 2.2 billion people did not have access to safely managed drinking water (SDG 6.1) and more than 4 billion people did not have access to safely managed sanitation (SDG 6.2). Together, these deprivations were responsible for approximately 8 per cent of all deaths among children under 5. Water pollution (SDG 6.3) has continued to worsen over the last two decades, causing increased threats to freshwater ecosystems, human health and sustainable development. 34 Furthermore, more than 2 billion people globally live in river basins suffering water stress, where total withdrawals exceed 40 per cent of the renewable freshwater available (SDG 6.4). In some countries in Africa and Asia, the proportion withdrawn extends beyond 70 per cent. 35 Irrigation is the primary human use of freshwater resources, and around 71 per cent of the world's irrigated area and 47 per cent of major cities currently experience at least periodic water shortages. 36 In addition, many vulnerable and poor people are dependent on activities such as rainfed agriculture that are highly susceptible to variability in precipitation patterns. 37,38 Environmental change poses multiple, interacting and mutually reinforcing risks to agricultural productivity and food security (SDG 2). Climate change is affecting crop yields. Yield decreases are already occurring in the tropics and are expected to continue. 39,40 Climate change also reduces the nutritional quality, availability and diversity of crops as well as undermining key ecosystem services that underpin food production. 41 Soil erosion from agricultural fields is estimated to be 10 to 20 times higher (under no-till systems) to more than 100 times higher (with conventional tillage) than the soil formation rate. 42 An estimated 176 Gt of soil organic carbon has been lost historically, mostly from land-use change, and another 27 Gt of soil organic carbon is projected to be lost between 2010 and 2050, affecting agricultural yields through reduced water-holding capacity and loss of nutrients. 43 As the remaining natural land suitable for agriculture is limited, future expansion is projected to take place on more marginal lands with lower yields. 44 Biodiversity loss and declines in regulating ecosystem services pose risks to food production through impacts on pollination services, resistance to more frequently applied pesticides and herbicides in insects and plants, and soil nutrient losses. 45 Animal pollination is critical to more than 75 per cent of global food crop types, including fruits and vegetables and some of the most important cash crops, such as coffee, cocoa and almonds. 46 Ground-level ozone is a strong oxidant that can enter plants through the leaves, affecting photosynthesis and other physiological functions, and thereby affecting forest productivity and agricultural yields. 47 Climate change risks to food security are expected to become high between 1.2°C and 3.5°C of warming depending on socioeconomic development pathways, and very high risks could be incurred with only 2°C warming in some pathways. 48 At 3-4°C of warming, very high risks of declines in crop yield in low latitudes are expected whilst 4°C of warming is considered catastrophic for food stability and access. 49 Rising carbon dioxide concentrations are projected to reduce the protein and micronutrient content of major cereal crops, which is expected to further reduce food and nutritional security. 50 Water availability, reliability and quality is being threatened by climate change, pollution and ecosystem degradation (SDG 6). Water stress is mostly driven by water demand, and demand from agriculture and irrigation -already the largest user -is expected to increase further in a changing climate. 51,52,53 All assessed scenarios project an increase in water demand and water scarcity. Biodiversity loss in agriculture threatens the resilience of food systems (SDG 2). The decline in pollinators, crop and livestock diversity and soil organic matter, threatens the agricultural yields of the few main crops that feed the world. Biodiversity in agricultural systems, whether at the genetic, species or ecosystem level, decreases vulnerability to stresses and shocks, reducing their impacts and supporting recovery and adaptation in the face of climate change and other environmental shifts. 63 Diversity increases the choices available to producers in their efforts to adapt production systems and to breeders in their search for better-adapted plant and animal populations. While more than 6,000 plant species have been cultivated for food, fewer than 200 make substantial contributions to global food output, with only nine (sugar cane, maize, rice, wheat, potatoes, soybeans, oil-palm fruit, sugar beet and cassava) accounting for 66 per cent of total crop production in 2014. The world's livestock production is based on about 40 animal species, but only a handful provide most of the global output of meat, milk and eggs. Among extant local breeds, 26 per cent are classed as being at risk of extinction. A third of freshwater fish species assessed are considered threatened. 64 Pollinators, natural enemies of pests, and beneficial soil organisms are under pressure from threats including habitat degradation and pollution.Climate change accelerates damage to ocean and coastal ecosystem integrity and functioning, impacting fishery catch and coastal livelihoods (SDG 2). Climate change, biodiversity loss and ocean acidification are increasing risks to fisheries and aquaculture via impacts on fish physiology, survivorship, habitat, reproduction and disease incidence, and on invasive species, and these effects will increase at higher levels of warming. 65 One projection suggests a decrease in global annual fishery catch for marine fisheries of more than 3 million tonnes for 2°C of global warming. 66 This threatens benefits for coastal livelihoods, especially for fishing communities in the tropics, sub-tropics and the Arctic. 67,68 In the oceans, nearly a third of fish stocks are already overfished 69 and over 55 per cent of the total ocean area has been subject to industrial fishing. Environmental degradation impacts human physical and mental health and causes millions of deaths annually (SDG 3). In 2012, almost a quarter of all deaths were attributable to modifiable environmental health risks, including air, water and land pollution; heatwaves, flooding and other weather extremes due to climate change; spread of pathogens; desertification; reduced biodiversity; and food inse-curity. 71 The SDGs address many of these risks, including vector and water-borne diseases (SDG 3.3), non-communicable diseases and mental health (SDG 3.4) and exposure to hazardous chemicals and air, water and soil contamination (SDG 3.9). The incidence of non-communicable diseases is on the rise globally and will continue to be affected by the state of the environment in relation to pollution, diet and physical (in)activity. Furthermore, emerging impacts and challenges for human health and well-being include threats from antimicrobial resistance, industrial chemicals, multiple exposures and newly emerging diseases. 72 Environmental pressures disproportionately affect the health of vulnerable and disadvantaged groups. The young, the elderly, women, people living in poverty and or with chronic health conditions, indigenous people and those targeted by racial profiling are some of the groups whose health is most vulnerable to the impacts of environmental decline. 73 Diarrhoeal disease, mostly caused by faeces-contaminated water, is responsible for around 1.7 million deaths every year, many of them children under 5 in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. 74 This is a prime example of how environmental pressures can disproportionately affect the young, especially as a significant proportion of these deaths can be prevented through safe drinking water, adequate sanitation and handwashing (SDGs 6.1 and 6.2). 75 The multifaceted relationship between the environment and human health should be framed within the context of social determinants of health as illustrated in figure 4.3. Socioeconomic and cultural factors have significant impacts on human health, through lifestyle choices and agency, inequalities, and damaging practices such as war, violence, unsafe working conditions and child labour. 76 Social and wealth inequalities as well as complex interrelations between health, socioeconomic and environmental factors, must be considered when striving to achieve SDG 3.Climate change increases health risks through undernutrition, disease, mental health stressors and violence, extreme weather events, heat stress and pollution. Health impacts from climate change depend on population vulnerability, individual livelihood status, cultural identity, income level and living area. Low-lying coastal zones and small island states, for example, will be more exposed to storm surges, coastal flooding and sea level rise. 77 Increases in ambient temperature are linearly related to hospitalizations and deaths once specific thresholds are exceeded. Risks associated with extreme weather events such as heatwaves, heavy precipitation in several regions, and droughts in some regions already become high between 1°C and 1.5°C warming (see figure 1.1, panel b). Tipping points could exist for human systems with increased temperatures and may arise in places in which low human adaptive capacity exists. Warming of ambient temperatures by up to 3°C is projected to see substantial increases in heatwaves causing heat stroke and death. 78,79 Risks of heat-related mortality and morbidity become high between 1°C and 3°C of global mean temperature increase, 80 whilst above 4°C cli-mate-related health impacts will likely increase non-linearly. Increased variability in precipitation patterns (e.g. shifts in monsoon seasons) is projected to increase the incidence of water-related and vector-borne diseases. 81 For example, the Aedes mosquito-borne diseases (dengue, chikungunya, Zika and yellow fever) are expected to expand their ranges, exposing additional populations to the risk of infection. 82 It is estimated that the world will see around 60,000 additional deaths due to climate change-induced malaria for the year 2030 and 30,000 deaths for 2050. 83 There is a lack of projections indicating how climate-sensitive health outcomes such as diarrheal disease and mental health could be affected by climate change. 84 Ecosystem degradation, biodiversity loss and increased human-animal interactions are eroding nature's contributions to human health and exacerbating the risk of zoonotic diseases. Urbanization, current agricultural practices, land-use change and biodiversity loss are altering ecosystem dynamics and facilitating increased human-animal contact. These changes exacerbate the risk of zoonotic disease emergence and spread. 85 Infectious diseases that develop into epidemics or even into pandemics, as is currently the case for the Coronavirus SARS CoV2 disease (COVID-19; see box 4.1), have major health, economic and social implications that may impact the way society interacts with the environment.Nature's ability to support the provision of medicines is in decline worldwide. An estimated 4 billion people rely primarily on natural medicines for their health care, with communities living in lower-income settings particularly reliant on largely plant-based traditional medicines. The health of these people is compromised as wild collected medicinal plants become less available. Some 70 per cent of drugs used for cancer are natural or are synthetic products inspired by nature and more than 20 per cent of modern drugs used for all diseases are based on leads from natural molecules, identified by science or based on indigenous local knowledge, including aspirin, vincristine and taxol. Though novel natural medicines are continuously being identified, the potential for future discoveries is critically undermined by biodiversity loss. 86,87 Pollution is expected to continue to contribute to millions more premature deaths in the coming decades. In 2015, it was estimated that 6.5 million deaths were attributable to ambient and indoor air pollution combined, 1.8 million deaths to water pollution (unsafe water sources and inadequate sanitation) and another 1.3 million deaths to pollution stemming from soil, heavy metals, chemicals and occu-pational environments. 88 As these three categories have overlapping contributions, total pollution-related mortality is estimated at 9 million deaths (16 per cent of total global mortality), which is three times as many deaths as AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria combined. From a health perspective, the most important outdoor air pollutants are groundlevel ozone and fine particulate matter. Due to emissions from industrial, agricultural, vehicular and domestic activities, as well as background dust and wildfires, large proportions of the global population remain exposed to levels of air pollution exceeding WHO guidelines. 89 The frequency and intensity of dust storms due to land degradation have increased over the last few decades in many dryland areas. 90 Scenarios that assume that past trends of stricter air pollution policies, coupled with increasing incomes will continue into the future, still anticipate 4.5 million to 7 million premature deaths globally by mid-century. 91 Ground-level ozone peaks, particularly in urban areas, are projected to increase ozone-related deaths. Total atmospheric mercury concentrations have increased by about 450 per cent above natural levels due to human activity, contributing to high mercury loads in some aquatic food webs and presenting a serious human health concern. 92 Eliminating emissions of ozone-depleting substances has prevented millions of cases of skin cancer. Ozone in the stratosphere screens out biologically damaging ultraviolet radiation. Excessive ultraviolet radiation exposure leads to melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer, cataracts and other health problems in humans. 93 If action had not been taken, growing emissions of ozonedepleting substances would have destroyed two thirds of the ozone layer by 2065, leading to millions of cases of skin cancer annually. 94 Mental health will become increasingly affected by the loss of nature and extreme weather events. Time spent in nature has positive impacts on physical and mental health. Natural and semi-natural ecosystems are spaces for physical exercise, recreational activities and mindfulness, and contribute to well-being, happiness, quality of life and a sense of place and belonging. 95 Other benefits of biodiversity include cultural identity and reduced post-surgery recovery time in patients with trees outside their hospital rooms. Inequalities in environmental opportunities and burdens are expressed and interconnected at various levels, arising between and within countries along dimensions of ethnicity, gender, race and income. Environmental burdens associated with pollution, resource scarcity and extreme events accentuate socioeconomic inequalities and are projected to increase under current development trajectories. 108,109,110 For instance, environmental pressures and their impacts on health and well-being fall especially on groups that are already vulnerable or disadvantaged (see Section 4.4). Furthermore, where poor people find work either in industry, agriculture or the informal sector, they are more likely than higher-wage employees to work in dangerous, unregulated settings where risks such as exposures to hazardous chemicals are high. 111Climate change accentuates inequality through direct and indirect impacts. Climate change disproportionately affects disadvantaged and vulnerable populations through food insecurity, higher food prices, income losses, lost livelihood opportunities, adverse health impacts and population displacements. 112 Some of the worst impacts are expected to fall on agricultural and coastal livelihoods, indigenous people, women, children and the elderly, poor labourers, poor urban dwellers in the Global South, and people and ecosystems in the Arctic and Small Island Developing States . 113,114 Countries with higher initial temperatures, greater climate change levels and lower levels of development, which often implies greater dependence on climate-sensitive sectors and in particular agriculture, are expected to bear the highest levels of impacts. 115Gender inequality accentuates vulnerability to environmental change and differences in access to the social and environmental resources needed for adaptation. Whereas both men and women experience changing demands in productive roles, women experience increasing burdens due to factors such as family care and reproductive responsibilities, and differential access to labour markets, land rights, education, health, and financial resources, as well as, in many contexts, unequal decision-making power. 116,117,118 Gender inequality is particularly marked in agriculture. While agricultural production is increasingly feminized, agricultural and food policies, including training and research and development, do not consider the specific needs of women. Furthermore, women have limited access to decision-making processes for resource management and have less access to resources that increase agricultural output, including financial resources, land, education, health and other basic rights. Women's relatively higher vulnerability to weather-related disasters is documented in terms of number of deaths and in how socially constructed gender differences affect exposure to extreme events, leading to differential patterns of mortality for both men and women. 11). Climate change and ecosystem degradation are impacting the provision of basis services to urban populations living in informal settlements (SDG 11.1) and can accentuate extreme weather events and their impacts (SDG 11.5). With around 6.5 million deaths annually related to ambient and indoor air pollution and 3 billion people lacking access to adequate waste disposal facilities, air pollution and waste management remain challenging in many cities (SDG 11.6).Compared to high-income neighbourhoods, informal settlements are more vulnerable to environmental degradation as they are often in areas prone to flooding, landslides and other natural disasters and close to landfills.Climate change is projected to increase risks for urban populations, assets and economies. Key risks to settlements from climate change that span sectors and regions and are projected to increase include heat stress, heavy precipitation, inland and coastal flooding, landslides, air pollution, drought, water scarcity, sea level rise and storm surges. Coastal communities are exposed to additional climate-related hazards, including tropical cyclones, marine heatwaves, sea-ice loss and permafrost thaw. 130,131 Cities, especially large landlocked cities, will be exposed to increased heat stress due to the urban heat island effect, which increases the intensity of heatwaves by an estimated 1.22°C to 4°C. 132,133 This is particularly relevant as the number of mega-cities grows. 134 Urbanization also increases extreme rainfall events over or downwind of cities. 135 Key urban risks associated with housing 136 include poor quality and inappropriate location, making them more vulnerable to extreme events. Climate-related risks will be amplified for those lacking essential infrastructure and services or living in exposed areas. 137,138 Climate change and ecosystem degradation will impact coastal communities through submergence, coastal flooding and erosion. The population and assets projected to be exposed to coastal risks as well as human pressures on coastal ecosystems will increase significantly in the coming decades due to population growth, economic development and urbanization. The costs of coastal adaptation vary strongly among and within regions and countries. Some low-lying developing countries and small island states are expected to face very high impacts that, in some cases, could have associated damage and adaptation costs of several percentage points of GDP (on low lying urban islands and urban atoll islands). 139,140 The vulnerability of coastal cities to natural disaster is exacerbated by loss of ecosystems such as mangroves that reduce the risks from storm surges. 141 In the absence of more ambitious adaptation efforts and under current trends of increasing exposure and vulnerability of coastal communities, annual coastal flood damages are projected to increase by 2-3 orders of magnitude by 2100 compared to today. 142Rapid development and urbanization combined with insufficient environmental governance in many regions suggest a likely worsening of air pollution and rising solid waste. Traffic, residential fuel burning, electricity generation, industry and agriculture all contribute to urban air pollution, with varying contributions of sectors in individual cities. In growing cities across Africa, Asia and other developing regions, there has been a rapid increase in the number of vehicles, driven by population growth and economic development. The impacts of pollution from megacities extend far beyond the urban area with effects at local, regional and global scales. 143 Solid waste is mostly generated in and disposed of in cities and its volume correlates with purchasing power. Cities produce 1.3 billion tons of solid waste per year. Solid waste per capita has doubled over the last decade. 144 Many low-income cities still have waste collection coverage in the range of 30-60 per cent. 145 With increasing incomes, global waste volumes are going to increase further, which will increase the pressure for policies that decouple economic development and human well-being from resource consumption. For example, without global intervention, the quantity of plastic in the ocean alone could increase to 100-250 million tons by 2025. 146 Waste has also become a global economic sector, with large quantities of often hazardous waste being unlawfully exported to developing countries, with the potential to cause significant impacts. 147 As developed countries pursue the goals of reduced waste, a circular economy and greater resource efficiency, developing countries must not be left behind. 148 97Making Peace with Nature: a scientific blueprint to tackle the climate, biodiversity and pollution emergenciesOnly transformative change will enable humanity to fulfil international environmental agreements and achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Only a \"fundamental, system-wide transformation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values\" can reverse the current trends that threaten the well-being of present and future generations and the survival of other species. 1,2,3 Transformation can also enable the realization of the collective vision of a sustainable future for humanity, one that involves a rapid and thorough decarbonization, food security for all, an end to poverty, harmony with life on land and beneath the water, and substantial improvements in justice and fairness. Transformative societal change would affect not only the subsystems described below (including economic and financial systems, energy systems, food systems, water systems, health systems, and systems for infrastructure and settlement), but rather simultaneously and holistically reshape these systems and the interactions between them. Human attention and political will are often exhausted after addressing system issues, including controversies involving trade-offs between different interests, whereas the emphasis should be on the possible synergies and multiple benefits of change.The magnitude of the problems hampering change requires larger-scale and more fundamental actions addressing the rules and dynamics of systems. 7 Transformation does not necessarily entail changing everything massively and quickly. Transformative change can be a product of incremental but cumulative changesespecially if those changes affect key drivers, such as structural elements or fundamental processes. 8 Each individual and organization has a role to play in moving society along pathways toward a sustainable future that will vary across nations, regions and contexts, including through existing institutions and policy approaches.Human knowledge, ingenuity, technology and cooperation can transform societies and economies and secure a sustainable future II. Transforming humankind's relationship with nature is the key to a sustainable future Fundamental, system-wide reorganization requires significant upfront investment but can generate large positive returns. For example, studies of greenhouse gas emissions reduction show that the costs of doing nothing, measured in terms of damages from future climate change, far exceeds the costs of investing in mitigation (see Section 4.2). Some emissions reduction strategies pay for themselves, such as investments in energy efficiency that can deliver cost savings of US$2.9-3.7 trillion per year by 2030 or switching to lowcost renewable energy sources. 9 Other interventions may need to be accompanied by structural changes so that the positive returns for society also generate positive economic returns for a business or household and encourage widespread adoption. This often requires the reform of subsidies and incentive structures (see Sections 5.1.2, 5.2). To guide and measure the outcomes of government action, more inclusive measures of wealth and economic performance can address the limitations of conventional metrics such as GDP, which fail to properly reflect the benefits of change because they exclude important non-market social or environmental benefits or damages such as negative externalities (see Section 5.2).Transformative change towards sustainability can result from strategic intervention at key points of leverage within systems. Implemented globally, transformative change would result in a world that operates differently in many important respects. To envision change on this scale, it can be helpful to identify elements of the destination of transformative change, or leverage points and describe the change needed in these elements. It is also possible to pinpoint key \"levers\" of a strategy to bring such change about, including a \"carrots and sticks\" approach. The elements and levers are outlined below. Constantly recalling the elements of the destination and adaptively managing systems can help to realize this vision.The elements of the \"destination\" and the strategy for transformative change are derived from several recent reports. Reviewing a wide range of assessments and other scenario and pathways analyses at global and regional scales, the IPBES Global Assessment proposed a framework for categorizing actions and strategies toward transformative change in terms of eight leverage points and five levers (recognizing that the metaphor of leverage is an imperfect one and that changes to complex systems are not straightforward). The UN Global Sustainable Development Report focuses on a set of four levers for achieving sustainable development [(i) governance, (ii) economy and finance, (iii) individual and collective action and (iv) science and technology] and six entry points to sustainability transformation [(i) human well-being and capabilities, (ii) sustainable and just economies, (iii) energy decarbonization and access, (iv) food systems and nutrition patterns, (v) urban and periurban development and (vi) global environmental commons. 10 ] This report lists eight leverage points in global, regional and local systems, and simplifies the five IPBES and four UN levers into three kinds of governance interventions. This is not a suite of options, but rather a checklist of constituents: each element likely must change in the transformation to sustainability, whereby some elements substantially enable others. 11Key areas for transformative change:1. Paradigms and visions of a good life: Move towards paradigms that emphasize relationships with people and nature over material consumption, including many existing visions of good lives as those lived in accordance with principles and virtues of responsibility to people and nature.Reduce the negative global effect of human needs and demand -a function of consumption and production rates, population size, and waste -by reducing per capita consumption and production in some regions and human population growth in others.3. Latent values of responsibility: Unleash existing capabilities and relational values of responsibility to enable widespread human and organizational action.Systematically reduce inequalities in income and other forms, including across gender, race and class.Practice justice for and inclusion in decisionmaking of those most affected by it, especially including indigenous peoples and local communities.6. Externalities: Understand and internalize the distant, delayed and diffuse negative effects of actions, including economic activity.7. Technology, innovation and investment: Transform regimes of investment and technological and social innovation, such that technologies and their use produce net-positive impacts on people and nature (for example, by transitioning to a circular economy and eliminating waste).Promote the broad base of knowledge and capability that is fundamental to well-functioning and just societies, and increase and spread knowledge specific to sustainability.The strategy and levers for transformative change:A. Fix the \"carrots\" and build capacity: Change the incentive structure facing individuals and organizations, including by broadly reforming subsidies to shift from harmful production-enhancing ones towards those that directly improve well-being and a suite of social and environmental capacities and outcomes. Simply adding new incentives to balance the negative effects of existing subsidies is not sufficient because of a lack of underlying capacity for environmental stewardship and because existing subsidies have systemic perverse effects.B. Manage better: Reform management organizations, programmes and policies to make them pre-emptive, inclusive, integrated across sectors and jurisdictions, robust to uncertainty, and geared towards system resilience or transformation as needed. Existing management systems are largely historical artefacts of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, geared towards underpopulated lands and lightly used waters, imagining linear relationships between causes and their effects. Sustainable pathways through the twenty-first century will require management systems designed to accommodate the complexity of social and ecological systems and pervasive and long-distance effects in space and time of local actions. Management would include unilateral action within states as well as bilateral and multilateral action across them.C. Strengthen the \"sticks\": Bolster environmental laws and policies and strengthen the rule of law by ensuring consistent enforcement of all laws, including by eliminating corruption and strengthening institutions such as independent judiciaries.Change in organizational and individual behaviour pervades every element of transformative change. Every lever applied at every leverage point entails and effects changes in human action, including by policymakers, politicians and a diverse set of actors in business and civil society. These changes can be top-down and/or bottom-up and can be accelerated when pressure for change emanates from multiple sources. Each lever can be applied at each leverage point by managers and decision makers at local, regional, national and international level, triggering broader social and industrial change.Government action may follow pressure from businesses and industry associations, public opinion and protest or advocacy from civil society organizations. Thus, these levers and leverage points are available both to those designing policy and practices and to those seeking to shape policy and practice via grassroots or other bottom-up actions.Six systems are key entry points for transformations towards sustainability. Synthesizing the six foci of the IPBES Global Assessment, 12 the Global Sustainable Development Report's six entry points, and the six transformations of The World in 2050 initiative, it is possible to identify six areas for system transformation: economy and finance; food and water; energy; human settlements; health, equity and peace; and environment (see table 5.1).Applying the levers to the leverage points fosters system transformations that move society toward sustainability.All three levers at the heart of a strategy for transformative change can be applied to each of the leverage points identified (see table 5.1). Similarly, pressure applied at the leverage points can drive transformational change in key systems. Bidirectional relationships between some systems and leverage points mean that systemic change can help shift the leverage points closer to the destination of sustainability. For instance, paradigms and visions of a good life (1) impact all systems. They are in turn shaped by changes especially in economy and finance, human settlements and health, equity and peace. Patterns of consumption, population and waste (2) both shape and are shaped by all six systems. Latent values of responsibility ( 3) are relevant to the actions of all players within the system (such as consumers, farmers and food distributors), and the configuration of systems can unleash action by all actors in line with latent values. Addressing inequalities ( 4) and enhancing participation (5) can enable system transformations; all six system transformations can lessen inequalities and enable participation. Similarly, addressing externalities (6) could enable the six system transformations, while the transformations within each system should substantially reduce externalities. All six system transformations could be driven partly by appropriate technology, innovation and investment (7); meanwhile economy and finance, energy and human settlements could also drive needed changes in technology, innovation and investment. Education and knowledge generation and sharing (8) could be a driver of all system transformations via specific knowledge systems and general societal education; only transformations in human health, equity and peace can really advance this leverage point.Transformative change can result from the culmination of many seemingly small but strategic actions, while some attractive and feasible actions can impede transformation. Global systems are multiscalar and complex and actions 103Making Peace with Nature: a scientific blueprint to tackle the climate, biodiversity and pollution emergencies intended to generate change face risk from co-option, unintended effects and unforeseen feedbacks. By acknowledging these risks and uncertainties, actions can be characterized in terms of their contribution to transformative change.• Transformative enablers are important actions that facilitate broader systemic change (e.g. the replacement of GDP by better measures of sustainability such as inclusive wealth).• Incremental enablers are actions that yield small changes whose accumulated impact contributes to transformative change (e.g. slowly shifting and reorienting subsidies, wholesale subsidy reform would be a transformative enabler).• Necessary measures are actions to protect nature and its contributions to people in the short term, but which may not contribute to transformative change (e.g. the expansion of protected areas).• Insufficient measures are interventions that may contribute somewhat to environmental protection in the short term, but detract from longer-term efforts towards transformative change (e.g. incentive programs for biodiversity and ecosystem services not accompanied by wider reform of harmful subsidies or environmental law).Feasibility may vary widely across strategies and actions, but transformative enablers may only become feasible after intervention via incremental enablers or the triggering of tipping points. The changes that appear most feasible may be those that do not contribute to, or even impede, transformative change, for instance by retaining or even consolidating the power of interests vested in the status quo (see Section 5.3).Participatory and equitable processes can raise public acceptance of transformative change (leverage point 5). While the appropriate level and nature of inclusion of rights-holders and stakeholders varies across contexts, broad participation and the perception of fairness in decision-making processes and outcomes is key to generating public acceptance of transformative change (leverage point 5). 13,14 Systemic opposition, friction and inertia can thwart transformative change. 15 Existing infrastructure and built capital create system inertia by making change difficult and costly. In addition, individuals and organizations have habits, procedures and ways of doing business. These norms yield a reluctance and resistance to change. Some individuals and organizations also have substantial stakes in maintaining the status quo. These vested interests may oppose change that disrupts their livelihoods, market share and future revenues. These barriers can be overcome with investments to overhaul infrastructure and built capital, directly confronting regressive habits and norms, and enabling the reorganization of labour by, for example, providing financial incentives and training to shift businesses and labour away from unsustainable industries and practices towards sustainable ones.Societies have demonstrated both potential and limitations in the capacity to undertake widespread systemic change in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. The 2020 mobilization in response to the COVID-19 pandemic indicates how societies are capable of systemic change, but also how parts of society may resist change. The rapid design, implementation and relatively widespread acceptance of physical-distancing measures, restrictions on movement and economic activities, despite the resulting economic and social dislocation in many nations, demonstrate how shifts in norms and priorities (leverage points 1 and 3) can reshape multiple systems.Widespread systemic change is needed to address the global environmental emergencies through mitigation, restoration and adaptation. Transformative change must begin now to avoid imposing huge and potentially irreversible environmental declines on today's youth and future generations.A sustainable future is achievable, and it can be a just and prosperous one, full of human ingenuity and opportunity, nourished by and caring for a vibrant natural world. The following sections on the key systems for transformation detail specific changes that can enable society to collectively realize this ambitious but essential vision for humanity and the Earth. Participation in environmental action and resource useTechnology, innovation and investment The action of the levers and leverage points in fostering the six key system transformations Direct actions that can foster the system transformations,•• = Both levers and leverage points can apply • = Leverage points can primarily influence the system transformations 105Making Peace with Nature: a scientific blueprint to tackle the climate, biodiversity and pollution emergenciesClimate change, loss of biodiversity, land degradation, and air and water pollution are highly interconnected. This section examines how these interconnected systems can be transformed individually and collectively to be sustainable, assessing which actions are synergistic and which involve trade-offs, emphasizing actions needed in the short-term.Protecting life on Earth, including human life, requires actions that are significantly more effective than those taken thus far. Action to halt the loss of biodiversity and land degradation, avoid dangerous climate change and keep the effects of chemicals on the biosphere within tolerable limits must be coordinated to be effective. All these forms of degradation are primarily driven by the unsustainable level of consumption by the well-off, while the poor are left behind, characterizing contemporary civilization. Achieving transformative change requires that the fundamental drivers of overconsumption are addressed, through changes in personal values, norms, economic and social operating rules, technologies and regulations.Given the interconnected nature of climate change, loss of biodiversity, land degradation, and air and water pollution, it is essential that these problems are tackled together urgently. Actions needs to be taken now even where the benefits may not be realized for years due to the long-lasting nature of environmental effects or to inertia in the socioeconomic system. Essential actions with delayed effects include reforestation and restoration of degraded lands. Response options that can address multiple environmental issues, mitigate multidimensional vulnerability and help minimize trade-offs and maximize synergies, need to be implemented. Numerous response options that can preserve and restore the environment and contribute to achieving some of the other SDGs have already been identified. For example, large-scale reforestation with native vegetation can simultaneously help address climate change, biodiversity loss, land degradation and water security. A key challenge is to avoid unintended consequences.For instance, large-scale afforestation schemes that replace native vegetation with monoculture crops to supply bioenergy can be detrimental to biodiversity and water resources.Earth's environmental emergencies must be addressed together to achieve sustainability 6.1 Scaled-up and accelerated actions to address climate change in this decade are essential Mitigation and adaptation are both urgently needed to reduce the risks of climate change. 1 Mitigation is insufficient to remove all the risks from climate change since adverse climate impacts are already apparent and more are projected at 1.5°C of warming and beyond. Some impacts, such as sea level rise, will continue for centuries after the global temperature has stabilized. 2 Without meaningful climate mitigation, adaptation also will be insufficient to limit all the risks associated with climate change. Limits to adaptation already exist for the most sensitive human and natural systems at 1.5°C of warming, and further limits exist at higher levels of warming.A slower rate and magnitude of climate change creates additional opportunities for adaptation. 3 Governments must scale up and accelerate action to meet the Paris Agreement goals and limit dangerous climate change. Evidence shows that the risks associated with climate change, including risks of extreme weather events, of impacts on unique and threatened ecosystems, and of large-scale discontinuities such as the disintegration of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets (see figure 1.1), are generally higher than previously understood. There is a near-linear relationship between future temperature change and cumulative carbon dioxide emissions. This relationship implies that net emissions would need to be reduced to zero within only a few decades if the Paris Agreement goals are to be met.Limiting the global mean temperature increase to well below 2°C and pursuing efforts to stay below 1.5°C, in line with the Paris Agreement requires significant strengthening and rapid implementation of existing national pledges to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. To limit global warming to 1.5°C, with a probability of about 50 per cent, net emissions of carbon dioxide will need to be reduced by 45 per cent by 2030 compared to 2010 levels and reach zero by 2050. To limit global warming to 2°C, emissions need to decline by about 25 per cent by 2030 compared to 2010 levels and reach net zero by around 2070. 4 Emissions of other greenhouse gases must also be reduced rapidly. The target year for net-zero emissions for other greenhouse gases is generally projected to occur about one or two decades later than that for carbon dioxide. More ambitious reductions would be necessary for higher certainty of avoiding dangerous climate change, as indicated in the emissions gap presented in figure 6.1, which shows pathways with about 66 per cent chance of limiting global warming to 1.5°C and 2°C. 5 Delaying action exacerbates difficulties and incurs greater costs. 6An important determinant in climate change mitigation is the timing of emission reductions, affecting both short-term and long-term technology choices. Slower emission reductions in the short term will require very rapid reductions later in the century, followed by the large-scale removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, if the Paris Agreement goals are to be met. Carbon dioxide removal technologies differ widely in terms of maturity, potential and risks, while several technologies have significant negative impacts on land, energy, water and nutrients when deployed on a large scale. In contrast, the sequestration of carbon in restored natural ecosystems and soil do not require land-use change and can have co-benefits, such as improved biodiversity, soil quality and local food security. Effective governance is needed to limit trade-offs and ensure the permanence of carbon storage in terrestrial, geological and ocean reservoirs. If negative emission technologies become practical at scale and affordable in the second half of the century, they would allow for a slightly slower energy system transition to low-carbon technologies.Even in this scenario, net-zero emissions would need to be achieved around the middle of the century. If the deployment of large-scale carbon dioxide removal is to be limited, deeper near-term emission reductions are required, combined with measures that lower demand for energy and land. 7,8 Limiting global warming requires rapid and far-reaching transformation of energy systems, land use, infrastructure and industrial processes. Emissions of carbon dioxide in both the land-use and energy systems can be reduced to zero or below based on a portfolio of mitigation measures, striking different balances between lowering energy and resource intensity, decarbonizing energy supply, and the reliance on carbon dioxide removal and behavioural change.For non-carbon dioxide emissions such as methane and nitrous oxide, measures have been identified to significantly reduce emissions from the energy sector (such as fugitive emissions of methane from mining) and agriculture (including methane from livestock and rice production), but it will be hard to reduce emissions to zero based on only technical measures. Immediate reductions in the emissions of shortlived climate forcers such as black carbon and methane are an important contribution in limiting warming. It should be noted that reductions in the use of fossil fuels also reduce cooling aerosol emissions, leading to less air pollution but also reducing the amount of climate change avoided. 9Adaptation involves both preparations for and responses to climate change impacts, with nature-based solutions playing a vital role. Mitigating climate change is vital, urgent and cost saving: the lower the degree of warming the easier and cheaper it will be to adapt. Societies, economies and ecosystems must adapt to changing temperature and precipitation patterns, including more heatwaves, heavy precipitation in several regions, droughts in some regions and higher sea levels. There has been significant progress in climate change preparedness over the last two decades. Adaptation options, if well-designed and managed in a participatory manner, can reduce the vulnerability of human and natural systems, and have many synergies with achieving the SDGs, including those related to food and water security, though potential trade-offs must be recognized. Adaptation is place-and context-specific and can be enhanced through complementary actions across all levels from individuals to governments. Increasing investment in social and physical infrastructure is vital to enhance the resilience and adaptive capacity of societies. Specific interventions can include climate-resilient agriculture, land-use planning, nature-based solutions such as conserving and restoring ecosystems, coastal defence systems and social safety nets. Nature-based solutions have gained prominence, given the close interlinkages between climate change and biodiversity loss, and the potential to deliver co-benefits. Nature-based adaptation options include restoration or protection of coral reefs, seagrass meadows, coastal wetlands, mangroves, and beaches to reduce coastal flooding and erosion; green and blue spaces to reduce urban flooding and heat-related risks; and protecting and restoring floodplains, peatlands, and riparian vegetation to reduce river flooding. Substantial gains in the protection of nature can be achieved through the sustainable management and restoration of landscapes and seascapes that are productive and often inhabited. Transformative actions to reduce the drivers of biodiversity loss must necessarily occur mostly in human-populated and production-oriented landscapes and seascapes outside of protected areas. This requires the development of new land-and resource-use rules and objectives that are beneficial, neutral or at least much less harmful to biodiversity, while permitting uses benefitting humans. 14 Effective management of land and sea resources and their biodiversity requires a situation-appropriate combination of: security and clarity of land tenure and responsibility; financial and non-financial incentives to resource owners and custodians; and regulations and agencies to monitor and enforce them, working at ecosystem scale and coordinating actions across the various agencies and jurisdictions involved. Recognition of the custodial traditions and knowledge of indigenous peoples and local communities, and the use of participatory approaches to resource management, are key success factors. A multiple land-use approach includes the promotion of pastoral, cropping and forestry practices that sustain biodiversity and support local livelihoods, while avoiding land degradation. It includes the strategic and widespread restoration of degraded lands and ecosystems. 15 An integrated approach to action is needed to bend the curve of biodiversity loss (figure 6.2). Fisheries reform, integrated spatial planning, conservation, climate mitigation and reduced pollution are all key to restoring marine life. Sustainable fish quotas are essential to reform fisheries, end overfishing and restore marine biodiversity. Integrated spatial planning covering multiple uses of marine resources can help advance sustainable development in oceans and coastal areas. 16,17 Trade negotiations are ongoing to craft new rules on the elimination of harmful fisheries subsidies. 18 Expansion of protected areas and strict no-take areas in both territorial waters and the open ocean can conserve and rebuild stocks of commercial and non-commercial species and protect aquatic ecosystems. No-take areas have been demonstrated to be an effective and practical solution to overfishing. The deep seas mostly fall outside of national sovereignty and thus have no pre-existing formal ownership rights. Consequently, only 5.3-7.4 per cent of the deep seas are currently protected. Catch and effort restrictions, regulation of fishing capacity and gear, and co-management of fisheries resources can all help conserve fish stocks. Restoring marine life in both the open oceans and in coastal areas is achievable using a combination of proven approaches, but only if global war-ming is limited to 1.5°C (which would hold the acidification of the oceans below critical thresholds) and the contamination of the oceans with chemicals, plastics, sewage and sediment (from land degradation) is halted. 19 Key actions to conserve biodiversity such as reversing the net loss of habitat, halting overharvesting, reducing pollution and slowing the spread of invasive alien species will help nature adapt to climate change. The relative importance and impact of the main drivers of biodiversity loss differ across different biomes. For example, habitat transformation is the major threat for tropical forests, while invasive alien species have their most severe impacts on islands and freshwater ecosystems. 20 Many species are endangered by overharvesting and poaching for human consumption in local or international markets, practices that also increase the risk of the emergence of novel zoonotic diseases like COVID-19. Alleviating these pressures will permit many populations and communities of wild organisms to remain viable as they track the moving location of their preferred climate zone. 21 Such adaptation strategies are consistent with the objectives and programmes of action Figure 6.2: Historical and modelled future trends in four selected terrestrial biodiversity indicators, based on a \"business as usual\" approach, a package of bold conservation and restoration measures (\"conservation action only\"), and an integrated package combining such conservation and restoration action with additional measures to address both supply-side and demand-side pressures on habitat conversion for food production (\"integrated action\"). 62 Source: CBD 2020b, GBO-5, Figure 22.1 of the conventions and other international undertakings on biodiversity, desertification, forest protection, air pollution, chemical management and ozone protection. Some solutions are beneficial to more than one issue; for example, the protection of intact forests reduces carbon emissions and also conserves biodiversity. 22,23 Such solutions are also consistent with nature-based adaptation strategies under the climate convention but are potentially undermined by unrestricted use of land-based climate mitigation options such as biofuel production or afforestation. 24,25,26 The private sector can help protect biodiversity by ensuring that the products it trades are sustainably sourced, and that benefits accrue in both local and distant locations. The removal by governments of implicit or explicit subsidies that have the unintentional effect of driving the loss of biodiversity or its habitats, including some forms of subsidies for farming, fishing, mining and industries exporting commodities will assist the private sector in achieving sustainable use. Beneficial market-based actions include positive incentives for protecting biodiversity or generating ecosystem services for the use of others. Consumer education, product traceability to source and certification as being climate, ecosystem and biodiversity-friendly permit consumers to make informed choices between harmful and sustainable products. Some companies, such as those trading and processing commodities like palm oil and cocoa, have adopted policies to reduce their environmental footprint, for instance by purchasing supplies from deforestation-free farmers or fisheries that reduce damage to non-target species. 27 Protected area networks need to be expanded, interconnected and better managed to conserve biodiversity in a changing climate. The expansion of formally protected areas, such as national parks, has been the main pillar of biodiversity conservation action for over a century. Despite significant progress (protected areas now cover more than 14 per cent of land, and almost 6 per cent of the ocean), 28 there are still important gaps in the representation of some ecosystems. 29 Wetlands are an example of a functionally critical, highly threatened and biodiversity-rich ecosystem needing urgent protection. 30 Many protected areas are too small or isolated to be effective in the long term, given the impacts of climate change. Increasing connectivity between fully or partly protected areas makes them more resilient to climate change and more able to sustain viable populations of threatened species. 31 Some ostensibly protected areas have weak management and governance and need increased investment, including for surveillance and law enforcement. Expansion of the protected area network continues to be beneficial. When the true value of natural capital and the services it provides are not considered (see Section 6.2), protected area expansion can seem politically and economically costly. Taking into account the risks of not protecting ecosystems, and strategic prioritization of locating new protected areas where the benefits are greatest in relation to the cost, greatly outperforms an ad hoc approach.Diverting land exclusively to climate mitigation adds to pressures on land use from food and fibre production.Transitions in global and regional land use are found in all pathways limiting global warming to 1.5°C with no or limited overshoot, but their scale depends on the pursued mitigation portfolio. 32 Land-use transitions as part of mitigation pathways could slow the achievement of other SDGs, such as those relating to life on land and in the oceans, food and water security, and equity; but there are also climate-oriented land-use transformation measures that could assist in reaching non-climate SDGs. The degree to which land use-based mitigation approaches such as afforestation and bioenergy are required depends on the mitigation portfolio that is pursued, but could potentially result (by 2050, relative to 2010) in an increase of up to 2.5 million km² in non-pasture agricultural land for food and feed crops, 6 million km² more agricultural land for energy crops, and a 9.5 million km² increase in planted forests. This magnitude of change would compromise the sustainable management of land for human settlements, food, livestock feed, fibre, bioenergy, carbon storage, biodiversity and other ecosystem services. 33,34 On the other hand, mitigation options limiting the demand for land include sustainable intensification of land-use practices, ecosystem restoration and changes towards less resource-intensive diets.Transforming land use can contribute to climate change mitigation while minimizing trade-offs. Relevant transformative actions include sustainable intensification, ecosystem restoration, dietary changes and food waste reduction. By maximizing the potential of transformative actions, it is possible to shift land use to a net greenhouse gas sink rather than a source. These options can contribute to climate change mitigation without driving detrimental land-cover change.They create strong direct and indirect co-benefits and have synergies with SDGs such as eradicating poverty, eliminating hunger, promoting good health and well-being, provision of clean water and sanitation, and life on land. 35 The practical actions include improved cropland and grazing management, dietary choices that minimize the requirement of new croplands, and the reduction of food waste. Transformation of diets and reduction of food waste can help to significantly reduce emissions resulting from the food system. At present about a quarter (12 GtCO2e per year) of net anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions arise from the agriculture, forestry and other land-use sectors, 36 while the global food system as a whole emits 21-37 per cent of global greenhouse gases, much of it from deforestation to create new agricultural lands. 37 Transformation of diets such that protein needs are derived more from plants and less from animals has the potential to reduce annual greenhouse gas emissions by 0.7-8 GtCO2e by 2050 (2-20 per cent of current emissions). 38 Co-benefits include improvements in human health and wellbeing, conservation of biodiversity and enhanced ecosystem services. 39 Reducing post-harvest losses, where a part of agricultural output never reaches the market, can be reduced by better storage and transport, and post-consumer loss can be reduced by education and change in consumer behaviour.Sustainable land management, coordinated and optimized at the scale of whole landscapes, can enable the multiple objectives of agricultural production, climate mitigation, climate adaptation and biodiversity protection to be realized simultaneously. Sustainable land-use strategies form a continuum, with end points dubbed \"land sparing\" and \"land sharing.\" Land sparing reduces the need to transform natural ecosystems to agricultural lands by increasing productivity on already-converted lands. Land sharing attempts to meet production, biodiversity conservation and climate mitigation objectives on the same land parcel. Different types of biodiversity and ecosystem services fare better with each approach. 40 There is increasing consensus that most multi-benefit, sustainable land-use systems will lie between these contrasting models, taking into consideration the specific social, economic, ecological and technological context of the landscape. 41Sustainable agricultural intensification can help to avoid further loss of natural ecosystems while also creating space for land-based mitigation and can have synergies with biodiversity conservation and restoration. Careful and appropriate agricultural intensification can reduce the loss of natural ecosystems, including by avoiding deforestation, and create space on former agricultural lands for land-based mitigation or biodiversity protection. To deliver the promised biodiversity and ecosystem services benefits, the spared land (i.e. land not used for agriculture thanks to intensification) must be used for ecosystem restoration and protection. Landscapes where the use-intensity already exceeds sustainability limits, on the other hand, would benefit from de-intensification. Many landscapes have both under-and over-intensive elements, and the optimal solution involves both land-sparing and land-sharing, along with other novel approaches. 42Land-and ocean-based climate mitigation approaches, including ecosystem restoration, could provide a third of the mitigation effort needed in the next decade. Nature-based solutions, such as reforestation with native trees, restoration of degraded lands, improved soil management and agroforestry, can contribute significantly to reducing the atmospheric abundance of carbon dioxide. Such solutions have been estimated to be able to provide 37 per cent of the mitigation effort needed until 2030 to limit warming to 2°C, 43,44 and coastal areas hold additional potential (see below).Ecosystem restoration can involve returning agricultural land to its natural state, or the rehabilitation of ecosystems on degraded land. Ecosystem restoration is a cost-effective way of achieving multiple benefits. 45 The potential for ecosystem restoration depends on the degree to which other transformative enablers such as sustainable intensification, dietary changes and food waste reduction are implemented, as there is potential competition between the use of land and water for ecosystem restoration, pastureland, and agricultural cropping for food and energy feedstocks. 46 To maximize the co-benefits, policies aimed at increasing land carbon sinks need to restrict activities to ecosystem restoration specifically, as opposed to the more general reforestation or afforestation, which might otherwise encourage the planting of monocultures of non-native trees 47 or the conversion of carbon-and species-rich peatland, grassland or savannas to less rich forests. Ecosystem restoration also helps biodiversity adapt to climate change.Ecosystem restoration can simultaneously mitigate climate change, slow and reverse biodiversity decline and increase the benefits that people get from nature. Restoration can deliver multiple benefits in all ecosystems. It offers particularly important benefits in dryland regions where climate change and desertification are projected to cause reductions in crop and livestock productivity. Avoiding, reducing and reversing land degradation, including desertification, would enhance soil fertility, increase carbon storage in soils and biomass, and increase agricultural productivity and food security. 48,49 Ecosystem restoration makes a cost-effective contribution to the timely action to avoid, reduce and reverse land degradation that can increase food and water security whilst contributing to climate change mitigation and adaptation. 50 This includes restoration of vegetated coastal ecosystems, such as mangroves, tidal marshes and seagrass meadows (coastal \"blue carbon\" ecosystems), that could provide climate change mitigation through increased carbon uptake and storage of around 0.5 per cent of current global emissions, with co-benefits for local ecosystems and livelihoods. 51 6.4 Science-based management can reduce the adverse effects of chemicals on human health and the environmentThe existing regulatory and legislative framework for the management of chemicals must be comprehensively implemented, taking into account the scale, complexity and pace of the issue. The development of basic legislation and institutional capacity has been recognized as critical to the attainment of sound chemicals and waste management. Many countries have already made important headway in enacting laws, creating programmes, and implementing policies to this end, in particular in the developed world, such as the REACH program in Europe and the Canadian Challenge Program on chemical substances. Further steps, particularly in developing countries and economies in transition, could include the following: intensification of action at all levels to strengthen legislative and institutional capacities to regulate chemicals and waste during their full life cycle; the development of national chemicals management profiles and action plans on the sound management of chemicals and waste; advancing the alignment and harmonization of policies between countries, mutual learning regarding effective approaches, and the maximization of opportunities for regional cooperation, drawing on existing institutional structures. 52Science-based approaches to the sound management of chemicals are available. Established approaches for the management of chemicals that are available to governments and regulators include: accelerating chemical hazard assessment and harmonized classifications of substances; refining chemical risk assessment and risk management decisionmaking processes; and advancing alternative assessments and informed substitution of chemicals of concern, including through non-chemical alternatives. At the same time, concerns have been expressed that current approaches are at times complex and slow. Over the past decades, valuable lessons have been learned in the practical application of these approaches, and opportunities have emerged to enhance their effectiveness, streamline their use, and employ them more systematically in all countries. Developing countries and economies in transition in particular stand to benefit from progress in these areas. 53 Data gaps can be filled if priorities are established. Opportunities to strengthen the engagement of scientists and the science-policy interface include: taking steps towards the cost-effective harmonization of data generation and collection, strengthening monitoring and surveillance capacities, and sharing data more systematically at all levels; scaling up industry engagement in generating and disseminating relevant data; strengthening two-way communication, and supporting collaboration between scientists and policymakers; and exploring methodologies that facilitate more systematic identification of future priorities at the international level. Although a wealth of data and knowledge has been generated, many data gaps and unknowns remain. These include gaps in regard to: chemical hazard data for a range of chemicals on the market; environmental, health and safety data; outdoor and indoor chemical releases; exposures and concentrations in humans and the environment; and adverse impacts of chemicals. Disparities remain in data collection and availability across time and countries, making the identification of baselines, trends, and emerging issues and priorities challenging. While a diverse set of mechanisms has been established at the international level to identify emerging issues and to set priorities for action (for example, the SAICM mechanism), opportunities exist to explore the complementarity of processes and the use of science-based criteria for prioritization. Various barriers pose challenges to making policy-relevant knowledge available for informed decision-making. 54 Innovation and new business models may help to reduce global and local chemical pollution. The implementation of new business models (such as chemical leasing) aimed at reducing the use of chemicals of concern, the scaling up of efforts to develop green and sustainable chemistry alternatives, and commitments to phase out chemicals of concern in consumer products, can all help to reduce chemical pollution. Despite these efforts, voluntary actions and sustainability strategies that go beyond compliance and advance sound chemicals management are not yet being sufficiently developed and replicated, particularly in developing countries. Furthermore, important private sector stakeholders are not yet fully engaged in relevant discussions at the national and international level. Strengthening corporate commitment at the highest level is therefore essential. From a design perspective, incentives to develop green and sustainable chemistry solutions are needed. Responsible production should be encouraged, and consumer information related to chemicals should be clear, transparent and reliable. As an important contribution to a sustainable future, chemistry and its products must be adapted to a circular economy -a system aimed at eliminating waste, circulating and recycling products, and saving resources and the environment. The increasing trade in chemicals and related products, and the quest to recycle products and materials, create opportunities but also raise concerns regarding the fate of chemicals and chemicals in products once they reach the waste stage or become secondary raw materials. Challenges include the chemical content of products becoming secondary raw materials, as well as the global flows of recycled products often being unknown, potentially impeding management intervention that could ensure undesired chemicals re-entering supply chains are not causing health and safety problems at various stages of the material flow. 55 Multi-stakeholder partnerships will help protect human health and the environment from the adverse effects of chemicals and waste. The engagement of all relevant stakeholders at the national, regional and global levels is needed to protect human health and the environment from the adverse effect of chemicals and waste. This includes not only the chemicals and waste community, such as ministries of environment and health, intergovernmental organizations, civil society organizations engaged in chemicals and waste, the chemical industry and trade unions, but also actors in key economic and enabling sectors, some of which have so far not been sufficiently engaged. Source: Source: CBD 2020a, GBO-5 SPM on the Paris Agreement, and vice versa. The manner of integrating adaptation, mitigation, biodiversity and sustainable development in policy is dependent on context-specific conditions where synergies are achieved and trade-offs are made, involving \"winners\" and \"losers\" across governance levels and time scales. 58 Reconciling trade-offs between development needs and emissions reductions requires an understanding of the dynamics between adaptation, mitigation and sustainable development, and of the specific roles that different actors play at particular points in time. Enhancing synergies and avoiding trade-offs is essential for achieving multiple benefits and transformative change for people and the planet.Multilevel governance is key for systemic transformation and for reconciling environmental and development objectives. 59 Governance approaches that coordinate and monitor multiscale policy actions and trade-offs across sectoral, local, national, regional and international levels are best suited for the implementation of environmental goals, such as those for climate change, biodiversity, land degradation, and air and water pollution, while simultaneously promoting sustainable development. 60 This is because vertical and horizontal policy integration and coordination enables the interplay and tradeoffs between sectors and spatial scales, and the dialogue between local communities, institutional bodies and nonstate actors.Policies that support the achievement of the SDGs, such as those for poverty alleviation, clean water and universal energy access, need to align constructively with environmental policies in order to realize potential synergies. Aligning policies synergistically increases their efficiency and effectiveness, whilst increasing societal support. For example, integrated landscape governance entails a mix of policies and instruments that together ensure nature conservation, ecological restoration and sustainable use, sustainable production (including of food, materials and energy), and sustainable forest management and infrastructure planning. 61 As a further example, the nature of legal rights to land ownership and of international forest certification systems can be reformed so that rural development and poverty alleviation can be aligned with carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation, thus avoiding deforestation and increasing the resilience of human and natural systems to environmental change. Such an approach can address and reverse the drivers of deforestation and prove transformative during the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration that begins in 2021. Better alignment of measures can create the portfolio of actions needed to protect and restore life on Earth (figure 6.3).Economic, financial and productive systems profoundly shape society's relationship with nature. This section examines how those systems can be transformed to lead and power the path to a sustainable future. It explores how the food, water and energy systems can be transformed to meet growing human needs in an equitable, resilient and environmentally friendly manner.Achieving a just and prosperous future for all on a safe and resilient planet requires the transformation of economic and financial systems. Current economic and financial systems focus on a narrow set of financial returns from market activities. Achieving the SDGs will require economic and financial systems that simultaneously support economic well-being, social inclusion and environmental sustainability -sometimes called the \"triple bottom line.\" Economic well-being means that all basic needs are met, meaning an end to poverty and hunger, and the provision of education, water and sanitation, clean energy, decent jobs and modern infrastructure for all (SDGs 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9). Social inclusion means gender equality, reduced inequalities and freedom from violence (SDGs 5, 10 and 16). Environmental sustainability means that dangerous climate change is averted, having clean air to breath and clean water to drink, life on land and in the water is protected and critical ecosystems functions preserved (SDGs 6, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15). 1,2,3 This all requires systemic change in economic and financial systems to assure freshwater availability, sustainable cities, sustainable production and consumption, climate stability, and protection of marine and terrestrial ecosystems (SDGs 6, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15).Achieving all of the Sustainable Development Goals will require large changes in economic activities, national accounts, financial systems and governance. 4 Securing equitable access to goods and services while averting dangerous climate change and avoiding environmental harm will require major structural changes in economic activities. Such a shift is 7Earth's environmental emergencies must be addressed together to achieve sustainability unlikely without reforming economic and financial systems to better align market incentives and national accounts with the protection of global commons and common-pool resources.Measures of economic performance should include the value of nature's contributions to human well-being. Including the value of nature's contributions to human well-being in measures of economic performance is vital for aligning economic incentives with more sustainable outcomes. The UN-led initiative on the System of Environmental Economic Accounting is working to expand the accounting rules to incorporate the value of nature. The framework integrates economic and environmental data to provide a more comprehensive view of the interrelationships between the economy and the environment and the stocks and changes in stocks of environmental assets.It is a flexible multipurpose system which generates outputs that can be adapted to countries' priorities and policy needs while at the same time producing internationally comparable statistics. I China is working to develop and report a measure of Gross Ecosystem Product along with GDP. 5Governments should use measures of inclusive wealth to track progress towards sustainable development. Sustainable development requires leaving future generations with sufficient capital assets, including natural capital, to allow them to meet their needs. 6 Governments should develop measures of inclusive wealth to inform policy and track progress towards sustainable development. Improved data collection, methods, and reporting of changes in natural capital along with other capital assets (produced and human) is needed in order to accurately measure inclusive wealth. 7,8,9,10 Measures of inclusive wealth may be supplemented by science-based environmental sustainability standards for critical natural capital that cannot be effectively substituted by other forms of capital.Making economic systems more sustainable requires policies that align private incentives with social and environmental objectives. Eliminating incentives for environ-I SEEA web page: https://seea.un.org/content/about-seea mentally harmful activity and promoting more sustainable alternatives can align private and social goals. Policy tools that internalize environmental costs include taxes on environmentally harmful activities and cap-and-trade systems targeted at emissions of pollutants. Policy tools that promote environmentally friendly alternatives include payments for ecosystem services, tax breaks for environmentally benign economic activities and feed-in tariffs for renewable energy.Policy reforms also include the abolition of perverse subsidies (especially in agriculture, energy and transportation) that damage global commons and common-pool resources, such as subsidies for fossil fuels that lead to climate change and air pollution. 11,12 Policies that reward the reduction, reuse and recycling of materials in production or that penalize waste generation can accelerate the shift to a circular economy. 13 A circular economy reduces pressures on natural resources and the pollution of land, water and air caused by waste disposal and inefficient use. Moving to a circular economy is one way to decouple economic growth from increasing environmental degradation. Putting a tax on the extraction of virgin raw resources and the disposal of waste to reflect their full costs increases the relative attractiveness of reducing, recycling and reusing existing materials. Product design and purchasing guidelines such as performance labels are another important policy lever. Achieving a circular economy requires changes in the practices of businesses and households. A key element is the notion that well-being does not necessarily increase with the consumption of resources, especially at high levels, but is rather derived from the services and amenities that resources help provide. 14 Efficiency and sufficiency reduce the needs for resources while increasing well-being. 15 A shift away from individual ownership towards a sharing economy can further increase economic efficiency and sufficiency. 16,17 Achieving sustainability will require major shifts in patterns and large flows of investment. In energy, accomplishing a transition from a fossil fuel-dominated supply to a low-carbon system consistent with Paris Agreement climate objectives will require investments in renewable energy, nuclear energy, transmission, distribution, storage and energy efficiency of US$0.8-2.9 trillion per year through 2050. 18 Global financing for biodiversity is estimated at about US$80-90 billion annually, 19 far below the conservatively estimated hundreds of billions of US dollars needed. 20 Biodiversity, climate and other environmental finance could be ramped up by redirecting some of the estimated more than US$5 trillion in annual subsidies on fossil fuels, non-sustainable agriculture and fishing, non-renewable energy, mining and transportation (see Section 2.2). Large investments are also required to make water, food and other economic sectors sustainable (see Section 7.2). The investments pledged by governments around the world to restart economies stalled by the COVID-19 pandemic should be directed toward sustainable economic structures and lifestyles that increase the inclusive wealth of society.Substantial private sector investment is needed to complement public financing to achieve the SDGs and assure resilient management of risk and natural disasters. The investments required to reach the SDGs exceed the capacity of public funding, therefore substantial private sector financing is essential. Socially-and environmentally-oriented investment funds that provide low-cost financing for sustainable projects can close part of the financing gap. Currently there is an estimated US$500 billion of assets in impact investing. 21 However, achieving large-scale financial flows on the scale needed to achieve the SDGs will likely require making such investments more financially attractive. New tools and approaches that can leverage and incentivize private sector funding include the use of capital markets to unlock private sector investment in sustainable infrastructure. The Global South needs increased access to low-interest finance in order to achieve the SDGs. The Global North has exacerbated the shortfall by failing to meet its commitments under environmental conventions and on international development assistance.Good governance is at the core of a well-functioning economy able to provide a good quality of life for all. Good governance, which involves interaction between state and non-state actors to assure the rule of law, the absence of corruption and global cooperation, is key in building inclusive and just economic and financial systems for transformative change. Economic growth directed towards increasing access to food, water, energy, good health and education, and a clean and healthy environment, improves quality of life, but with diminishing returns at high levels of income and consumption. A well-functioning sustainable economic system will \"meet the needs of the present, without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs Sustainable agriculture requires strategies and technologies to increase the productivity of land and the nutritional value of food while reducing water use intensity and the release of pollutants. Sustainably intensifying agriculture while reducing water scarcity requires more efficient use of water, increasing water storage and avoiding salinization.Technologies to increase the yield of nutritious food need to be adapted to specific agroecological zones to conserve soils and reduce fertilizer application, such as reactive nitrogen and phosphorous. Genetically modified organisms could potentially increase the efficiency of food production with crop varieties that are tolerant of pests, diseases, drought, floods and salinity. However, biosafety and social considerations must be taken into account (see Section 2.3.2). Organic farming and other forms of agroecology may make a significant contribution to the food system transformation, although further research is needed to increase yields. In some cases, sustainable intensification and precision agriculture may be the best approaches, while organic or agroecological systems may be appropriate elsewhere. Managing pollution from agricultural chemicals will be critical, as will reducing waste by limiting post-harvest and consumer losses. 23 Making freshwater systems sustainable in the face of climate change, increasing demand and pollution requires steps to improve supply and use efficiency, reduce pollution, and restore natural habitats and flow regimes. Impacts on freshwater systems from climate change, rising demand for extraction from agriculture, households and industry, and increasing pollution, require both cross-sectoral and sector-specific interventions that improve water use efficiency, increase storage, reduce contamination, minimize disruption and restore aquatic habitats and natural flow regimes. Water used for irrigated agriculture will remain the largest consumptive use of water, so sustainable water futures will include a range of solutions to manage irrigation water demand and increase agricultural water use productivity. Increased water use productivity in agriculture could be achieved through crop breeding and shifts in crop planting. 24 This will include improved irrigation techniques such as micro-irrigation, moisture conservation methods such as rainwater harvesting, which may include using indigenous and local practices, and maintaining vegetation and mulch cover. 25 Drought-resilient ecologically appropriate plants and other agroecological and ecosystem-based adaptation practices will also be important. 26 Some adaptation options can become maladaptive due to their environmental impacts, such as irrigation causing soil salinization or overextraction leading to groundwater depletion, so response options should be tailored to the context. 27 Improved management of urban and other water uses will also be necessary. Investment in wastewater treatment as well as in distribution and supply infrastructure are necessary for equitable access to clean water. 28 Renewable energy sources can be made less water-intensive with present technology, and existing hydropower dams can be managed to integrate ecological water requirements. Increased water storage can be achieved through policies that implement a mix of groundwater recharge, integrated management of surface and groundwater, wetland conservation, low-impact dams and decentralized (for example, household-based) rainwater collection. 29 Technical assistance and economic incentive programs can encourage sustainable farm practices and reduce pre-and post-harvest losses of food. Technical assistance is important to enable farmers to adopt more sustainable practices, especially for smallholders. Policies with incentives for sustainable practices include standards, certification schemes and payments for ecosystem services such as direct payments through agri-environmental schemes. 30 Agricultural losses can also be reduced by developing real-time plant disease diagnostics, supported by a global surveillance system, to monitor and contain crop disease outbreaks Limiting post-harvest losses requires investments in rural roads, electricity infrastructure, storage and cooling systems.Small-scale farmers, in particular women farmers, need to be empowered to embrace sustainable practices. Smallscale agricultural producers are at the heart of the challenge of food security. They therefore need access to information and technology, gender-sensitive and participatory research and extension services, financial and legal services, markets, added-value opportunities, access to and control over land and production inputs (including high-yielding, water-efficient, and pest-and disease resistant crops, and fertilizers), and groundwater and irrigation services. Reliable and affordable insurance for small-scale farmers to withstand and recover from environmental shocks is also needed.Measures are needed and available to protect pollinators.Given the worldwide decline in the populations and diversity of wild pollinators and the seasonal colony loss of western honey bees in some regions, it is important to maintain healthy pollinator communities. This can be achieved through agroecological farming practices, strengthening existing diversified farming systems, and investing in ecological infrastructure by protecting, restoring and connecting patches of natural and semi-natural habitats in agricultural landscapes. These measures need to be complemented by reducing the effects of pesticides, particularly insecticides such as neonicotinoids, on pollinators through integrated pest management. Honeybees also need to be protected from a broad range of parasites, including Varroa mites, by placing greater emphasis on hygiene and control of pathogens. 31Policy instruments to achieve water system sustainability include water reallocation at the basin scale and education and incentives to increase water use efficiency in agriculture. Integrated water resource management has moderate mitigation potential, with no adverse impacts on challenges related to climate change mitigation and adaptation, desertification and food security. 32 Drought resilience policies, including drought preparedness planning, early warning and monitoring, and improving water use efficiency, synergistically improve agricultural producer livelihoods and reduce water stress. 33 Environmental farm programs and agri-environment schemes, water efficiency requirements, and water pricing and incentive programs, such as water accounts and payment for ecosystem services programs, can also help relieve water stress. 34,35 Sustainable food production from freshwaters and the oceans requires improved management, planning and policy action. Fisheries management, spatial planning (including the implementation and expansion of marine protected areas) and policy action are needed to address drivers of decline in aquatic ecosystems such as climate change and pollution. Pathways to sustainable fisheries entail conserving, restoring and sustainably using marine ecosystems; rebuilding overfished stocks (including through targeted limits on catches or moratoria); reducing pollution; managing destructive extractive activities; eliminating harmful subsidies and illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing; adapting fisheries management to climate change impacts and reducing the environmental impact of aquaculture. For example, ending overfishing and rebuilding depleted resources may result in an increase of as much as 20 per cent in potential yield, provided that the transitional costs of rebuilding depleted stocks can be addressed. 36 Marine protected areas (including no-take zones) have demonstrated success in biodiversity conservation when managed effectively and can be further expanded through larger or more interconnected protected areas or new protected areas in currently underrepresented regions and key biodiversity areas. Integrated marine and coastal planning are important. Additional tools could include both non-market and market-based economic instruments for financing sustainable use and conservation, including for example payment for ecosystem services, biodiversity offset schemes, blue carbon sequestration, cap-and-trade programmes, green bonds and trust funds, new legal instruments, such as the proposed international, legally binding instrument on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and halting harmful subsidies, especially those aimed at maintaining capacity.Inequalities, especially regarding income and food subsistence for local communities and small-scale artisanal fisheries, need to be addressed to advance sustainability.For local communities, reduced, declining and unequal access to marine resources may, in a complex interaction with other factors, be a source of conflict. Adding to the risk from overfishing, tropical regions face critical challenges due to interactions with climate change (with fish stocks projected to 122 7. Transforming economic, financial and productive systems can lead and power the shift to sustainability move poleward), and intense coastal development. Equitable sharing of fish resources is a ubiquitous challenge worldwide that often translates into competition between industrial fisheries and small-scale artisanal fisheries. It is therefore critical to foster well-managed small-scale fisheries using selective and non-destructive gear to promote employment, lower fossil fuel consumption and reduce fisheries' footprint on the oceans. Universal access to clean energy requires a rapid transition to low-carbon systems in both the production and use of energy. Improving access to affordable and modern energy (SDG 7), preferably clean energy, coupled with innovation and efficiency gains, is vital to achieving equitable and sustainable economic growth while limiting global warming. Clean energy will also reduce poverty and indoor and outdoor air pollution and provide critical services such as communications, lighting and water pumping. Achieving this goal while combating climate change involves a rapid transition to low-carbon energy systems encompassing both production and consumption. Investments in the energy transition need to grow five-or sixfold between now and 2050 to limit warning to 1.5 °C as aspired to in the Paris Agreement. 41 Renewable energy technologies such as wind and solar, along with improved energy efficiency in buildings and elsewhere, will be key.Since 2000, progress with respect to access to modern energy services has been made in all regions, but billions of people still lack such access. Progress on access to modern energy has been made especially in Asia, while in sub-Saharan Africa, population growth largely outpaced the advances made, with these trends projected to continue towards 2030. 42 More than 800 million people still do not have access to electricity, 43 and some 3.8 billion are exposed to household air pollution from burning of solid fuels such as traditional biomass, kerosene and coal 44 -fuels that also contribute to climate change. Striking global inequality in access to energy services is reflected in adverse impacts on development and health. In 2019, air pollution is estimated to have contributed to about 6.5 million deaths worldwide, and one third of these deaths are attributed household air pollution. 45 To achieve universal access to clean fuels and technologies, the affordability, availability and safety of fuels and practices for cooking, heating and lightning need to be improved. 46 Achieving universal access to electricity requires expanded generation capacity and distribution networks, as well as access to more efficient and affordable appliances, with a focus on poor, remote communities. Clean cooking and universal access to electricity improve health and reduces greenhouse gas emissions if traditional fuels are replaced by electricity (especially if it is generated renewably) or natural gas.It is possible to transform the energy system to provide clean and affordable energy for all. Analyses show that energy efficiency and sufficiency, increasing the share of renewable energy, and electrification all play a key role in providing access to modern energy services. 47 Today's reliable, affordable and resilient energy options are driving a new paradigm of heterogeneity. Distributed solutions today offer increasingly compelling economics for those without access to traditional energy carriers, suggesting a fundamental reconsideration of infrastructure policies, energy access solutions and economics that does not rely on uniform -or old and outdatedassumptions about energy systems and embraces a portfolio of solutions versus singular approaches.Transforming the energy system is key to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Key components of a strategy to transform the energy system include mitigating energy demand, decarbonization of the power system, further electrification of energy supply and phasing out fossil fuel use in other sectors. Mitigating energy demand (either by efficiency improvements or changes in human activity) is essential. It not only leads to direct emission reductions, but it also limits the volume of energy supply, which reduces the environmental impacts associated with energy supply beyond those of climate change.Falling costs for the generation of renewable energy and energy storage are bringing higher mitigation targets within reach. In the last decades, the cost of photovoltaic solar cells, wind turbines and batteries has fallen significantly. As a result, in some cases renewable electricity is as cheap to generate as fossil-fuel based alternatives. This development has resulted in rapid growth of renewable energy capacity, a trend that can help create a net-zero power system, although further developments to overcome system integration issues are needed. People's health and well-being are strongly influenced by environmental factors. This section identifies actions that can be taken to reverse environmental declines that threaten human health. It also examines the role of environmental factors and natural resources in promoting peaceful societies before addressing how making cities more sustainable can promote human well-being.The ensemble of environmental issues that threaten human health and exacerbate inequalities within and between countries must be addressed. Policies and technologies are needed to limit the impacts on human health from climate change (e.g. vector-and water-borne diseases, heat stress mortality, extreme weather events, less nutritious foods), air pollution (e.g. cardio-vascular and respiratory diseases), loss of biodiversity and illegal wildlife trade (e.g. zoonotic and vector-borne diseases), water pollution (e.g. diarrhoea and cholera), and exposure to chemicals (e.g. poisoning from mercury, lead and pesticides). The policies and technologies required are addressed in more detail below.Substantial improvements in global human health and well-being (SDG 3) can be achieved through transformative changes. They include a shift to sustainable land management and environmental stewardship. A transformation of energy and transport systems to create a low-carbon economy promises large benefits for human health, including through reduced pollution (SDG 7). Transformative changes focus action on high-level determinants of the health of people and the environment as well as the drivers of environmental change. A shift to sustainable land management is essential to safeguard human health and nutrition as well as livelihoods and other components of well-being. Reduced environmental impacts, which can be achieved through innovative technology, policy or institutional and cultural changes, are required to maintain the valuable ecosystem services upon which human lives 8Keeping the planet healthy is key to providing health and well-being for all depend (SDG 12). 1,2 Eliminating the use of fossil fuels can significantly reduce outdoor air pollution, which is projected to contribute annually to 4.5 million premature deaths by 2040 and 7 million premature deaths by 2050, 3 while also reducing the adverse health impacts from human-induced climate change (SDG 13). Access to clean and modern energy can reduce mortality and morbidity among the about 3.8 billion people who still rely on solid fuels for heating and cooking (see Section 7.3).New forms of governance and cooperation that are inclusive and participatory can generate sustainable improvements in the health of people and nature. Improved coordination and collaboration between governments, individuals, civil society, the private sector and scientists can break cycles of intergenerational poverty and inequality by emphasizing the value of investing in the well-being of people (SDGs 11, 16 and 17). Such new forms of governance and cooperation are needed to provide better education, health care, nutrition, water and sanitation, and energy access, which are all critical to maintaining healthy individuals. 4 An example is cooperation between herders, health officials, human and veterinary doctors, ecologists and anthropologists in the management of zoonotic diseases. 5 Addressing inequalities and poverty can also help to achieve long-term environmental sustainability with benefits for health. 6 Preventing environmental degradation saves lives. Environmental stewardship is key to a preventative approach to health care, which is in turn key for long-term health outcomes. A preventative approach can be achieved through intersectoral approaches, local community-based interventions, judicious legal and policy frameworks, rapid detection programmes, adequate financial resource allocation and ready-to-use rapid-response intervention plans. Large-scale approaches based on multidisciplinary efforts, such as One Health, encompass the opportunities and challenges pertaining to the interconnections of the human-animalenvironment interface. 7 The primary aim is optimal health outcomes for all three sectors: human health, animal health and environment health. Through the surveillance of \"hotspots\" for emerging diseases by considering behaviours, practices, and biological and ecological factors, successful detection, management and control of emerging infectious diseases, such as zoonoses, is possible. This must happen at a local level for best results. 8 By protecting the environment and increasing understanding of risks of emerging infectious diseases, countries will be better equipped to prevent, prepare for, and respond to (the threat of) an outbreak (see Box 8.1). 9 Box 8.1 Avoiding pandemics and the transition to a sustainable worldThe COVID-19 pandemic, which was still unfolding at the time of the completion of this report, illustrates why the transformation to a sustainable future needs to be accelerated. Science plays a pivotal role in informing policies that can drive this transformation, and a key area that needs to be better understood is the interaction between society and nature.The emergence of new infectious diseases in humans, animals and plants can be exacerbated by human activities. Activities that contribute to ecological degradation can increase the risk of zoonotic-origin disease from wildlife through increased human contact with pathogens and changes in pathogen ecology. These activities include climate change, land-use change and fragmentation, agricultural intensification, deforestation, and legal and illegal commercial wildlife trade. In particular, the creation of new habitat edges at the interfaces between humans and wildlife increases the risk of pathogens spilling over from their wildlife hosts into human populations and their livestock. 10 The risk of zoonotic-origin epidemics and pandemics can be reduced by managing such human activities and by applying a holistic One Health approach. 11,12,13 A One Health approach recognizes how human, animal, plant and environmental health are intrinsically connected and profoundly influenced by human activities. COVID-19 has delivered a shock to humanity that could spark a paradigm shift towards a healthier and more sustainable future. Governments around the world are investing trillions of US dollars to catalyse economic recovery. This is an opportunity to build back better by ensuring that the social and economic measures put in place by countries to emerge from the crisis aim at moving away from unsustainable practices and accele-rating the transformation towards the implementation of all the SDGs. SDG 17 calls for \"Partnerships for the Goals,\" to ensure that all SDGs are implemented with science-based decision-making, sound governance and a sense of responsibility of individuals. To achieve transformation, society must overcome sectoral silos, entrenched power, and economic interests, eliminate harmful drivers and perverse incentives, while promoting resilience and adaptation. There is a need for cooperative, multilateral and engaged democratic action at all levels of society, in every country, and at the international level. As part of this effort, promoting and operationalizing the One Health approach is paramount to secure human health in this changed world, including by preventing and improving the response to future pandemics. COVID Participatory approaches to spatial planning can lessen conflicts over resources. At the regional level, participatory approaches to spatial planning and zoning, including land-use planning, water use planning, ecosystem modelling, marine spatial planning, integrated coastal zone management, and integrated watershed management can lessen the conflicts between economic actors competing for resources. 20 Measures to prevent and reduce conflict include supporting co-management regimes for collaborative water management, fostering equity between water users (while maintaining minimum flows for aquatic ecosystems) and promoting transparency and access to information. 21Multilateral agreements addressing transboundary issues are key to protecting the global commons. At the international level, multilateral agreements addressing transboundary issues are key to the protection of the global commons, and adaptive governance involving a wide range of institutions and stakeholders can help ensure their sustainable management. Building upon and enhancing existing international agreements can further strengthen the protection of global commons and help establish partnerships for solving conflicts and for the sustainable management of commons. 22Rapid urbanization makes the design of environmentally and socially sustainable cities critical. The share of people living in urban areas is projected to increase from 54 per cent in 2015 to 78 per cent in 2050. Around 90 per cent of population growth in cities is projected to take place in low-income countries, mainly in small and medium-sized cities in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia (see Section 2.3.1). The expansion of the world's urban areas in the next two to three decades poses challenges and represents opportunities to plan and design sustainable cities. 23,24,25 In rapidly growing and urbanizing regions, climate mitigation strategies based on urban design, spatial planning and efficient infrastructure can avoid the lockin of high emission patterns. 26,27 In industrialized countries with cities characterized by urban sprawl, it is crucial to promote more intensive and smarter use of space and regeneration of city centres. 28 Urban systems transitions require deep and far-reaching solutions, significant upscaling of investments 29 and institutional capacity development. Make own international activities and operations sustainable. d) Health and well-being Facilitate international cooperation on protecting the health of the planet in order to provide health and well-being for all. Advance a One Health approach and strategies to meet WHO guidelines for air pollutants. Continue to promote the coordination and implementation of existing chemicals conventions and strengthen the science-policy interface for chemicals and waste. Implement monitoring and surveillance and early warning systems. e) Cities and settlements Promote sustainable urban planning, nature-based solutions for climate and biodiversity in urban areas, retrofitting of blue and green infrastructure, and access to urban services including clean energy and water.2. Transform economic and financial systems so they lead and power the shift toward sustainability a) Accounting for nature Facilitate international cooperation on frameworks for natural capital accounting, reform of measures and models of economic growth including through the use of natural capital and inclusive wealth in decision-making, and reform of trade systems to make them more fair and environmentally sustainable. 2. Transform economic and financial systems so they lead and power the shift toward sustainability a) Accounting for nature Promote the use of natural capital accounting, and initiatives for the transformation to a sustainable and circular economy. b) Subsidies and markets Engage in carbon trading, schemes for offsetting of nature and payment for ecosystem services Promote behavioural change in consumption and production, including among their own members and wider society. c) Investments Advocate for policies and regulations that promote investment in sustainable development.3. Transform food, water and energy systems to meet growing human needs in an equitable, resilient and environmentally friendly manner a) Access Advocate for and implement programmes and projects for improved access to affordable and nutritious food, clean energy and safe water for all. b) Food and water Develop and implement initiatives for the ecological intensification and sustainable use of multifunctional landscapes. planning and initiatives to increase access to urban services, and promote nature-based solutions and green and blue infrastructure.2. Transform economic and financial systems so they lead and power the shift toward sustainability a) Accounting for nature Foster economic and financial transformations by supporting initiatives to include environmental costs in the prices of goods and services. b) Subsidies and markets Engage in carbon trading, schemes for offsetting nature, and payments for ecosystem services. Support fair trade and companies with sustainable production models that provide services and products that foster societal well-being. c) Investments Support shifts in investment towards those needed to achieve the SDGs, and away from unsustainable industries, such as fossil fuels.3. Transform food, water and energy systems to meet growing human needs in an equitable, resilient and environmentally friendly manner a) Access Support and engage in local production and distribution systems for healthy food, safe water and clean energy. b) Food and water Consider what constitutes a healthy diet and also reduces environmental damage. Adopt sustainable practices in community-based and small-scale food production. Purchase sustainably produced food and reduce waste. Reduce wasting water, and collect rainwater and use grey water. c) Energy Support community-based energy production. Reduce energy consumption and chose clean energy when possible.1409 All actors have a part to play in transforming humankind's relationship with nature educational organizations 1. Address Earth's environmental emergencies and human well-being together a) Synergies Develop analytical tools, including plausible futures models, using exploratory, target-seeking and policy-screening scenarios that account for the complex interlinkages between environment and development. Further develop observational programs. Engage in national and international scientific assessments. Develop environmental education programs for all age groups. Raise public awareness through public engagements, editorials, social media. b) Climate change Assess the impact of climate change on socio-economic sectors, nature and human health at all scales. Assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of different mitigation and adaptation policies and technologies. c) Biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation Assess the impact of multiple drivers on biodiversity and ecosystem degradation, and the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of conservation and restoration activities, including nature-based solutions. d) Health and well-being Promote education, information and awareness of One Health approaches. Assess interactions among environmental issues and their impacts on socioeconomic sectors and human health. Assess the implications of chemicals for human health and the environment, and develop health surveillance and monitoring systems, and approaches to prevent disease outbreaks, including pandemics. Assess the mental health implications of green and blue infrastructure in urban environments. e) Cities and settlements Support sustainable urban planning and development, including the use of nature-based solutions. Promote education, information and awareness on sustainable cities and settlements and their importance for human health.2. Transform economic and financial systems so they lead and power the shift toward sustainability a) Accounting for nature Further develop the framework for natural capital accounting and the relevant databases. Assess the costs and benefits of mitigating and adapting to climate change, loss of biodiversity and ecosystem degradation, land degradation, and air and water pollution at a range of spatial scales. Assess the implications of reforming measures and models of economic growth. Promote education, information and awareness on sustainable economic and financial systems. b) Subsidies and markets Assess the environmental and distributional social impacts of reductions in harmful subsidies, and the reallocation of these resources to support sustainable consumption and production. c) Investments Assess the environmental and social impacts of switching investments from unsustainable activities such as fossil fuels to sustainable activities. Support campaigns for meaningful transformations in the health sector. e) Cities and settlements Document the impact on people and nature of unsustainable systems in urban areas and support campaigns for transformations in how cities and settlements are planned and designed, including the supply of essential services.2. Transform economic and financial systems so they lead and power the shift toward sustainability a) Accounting for nature Raise awareness of how current economic models and performance measures as well as the price of some goods and services fail to fully account for natural capital and environmental costs, and how this skews investment toward unsustainable activities. Support campaigns for meaningful transformations in economic and financial systems. b) Subsidies and markets Inform the public and other actors of the adverse consequences of fossil fuel and agricultural subsidies that lead to environmental damage, and explore the impact of redirecting the financing of subsidies to sustainable activities. c) Investments Highlight government spending and private sector investments that are unsustainable and those which are sustainable. Adaptation Adjustment in natural or human systems to a new or changing environment, including anticipatory and reactive adaptation, private and public adaptation, and autonomous and planned adaptation.; In human systems, the process of adjustment to actual or expected climate and its effects in order to moderate harm or exploit beneficial opportunities. In natural systems, the process of adjustment to actual climate and its effects; human intervention may facilitate adjustment to expected climate.A collection of airborne solid or liquid particles suspended in air, with a typical size between a few nanometers to tens of micrometres (μm). Aerosol particles can reside in the atmosphere up to weeks. Aerosols may be of either natural or anthropogenic origin. 10 9 (1 000 000 000).Renewable energy produced by living organisms.; Energy derived from any form of biomass such as recently living organisms or their metabolic by-products.Organic material above and below ground and in water, both living and dead, such as trees, crops, grasses, tree litter and roots. In Section 2, used as the unit to measure ratios of mammals on Earth in gigatons of carbon.Accumulating from the lowest level of a hierarchy or process to the highest level.Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) Anthropogenic activities removing CO2 from the atmosphere and durably storing it in geological, terrestrial, or ocean reservoirs, or in products. It includes existing and potential anthropogenic enhancement of biological or geochemical sinks and direct air capture and storage but excludes natural CO2 uptake not directly caused by human activities.The process of increasing the carbon content of a reservoir other than the atmosphere.The quantity of carbon contained in a \"pool\", meaning a reservoir or system which has the capacity to accumulate or release carbon.A levy on the carbon content of fossil fuels. Because virtually all of the carbon in fossil fuels is ultimately emitted as CO2, a carbon tax is equivalent to an emission tax on CO2 emissions.Chikungunya is a viral disease transmitted to humans by infected mosquitoes. It causes fever and severe joint pain.Other symptoms include muscle pain, headache, nausea, fatigue and rash.A group of chemicals containing chlorine, fluorine and carbon atoms, highly volatile and of low toxicity, widely used in the past as refrigerants, solvents, propellants and foaming agents. Chlorofluorocarbons have both ozone depletion and global warming potential.147Making Peace with Nature: a scientific blueprint to tackle the climate, biodiversity and pollution emergenciesA circular economy is a systems-based approach to industrial processes and economic activities that enables the resources used to maintain their highest value for as long as possible. Key considerations in implementing a circular economy are reducing use, extending longevity, renewability, reusability, reparability, replaceability, upgradability of resources and products.The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change definition is \"a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate variability observed over comparable time periods.\"The positive effects that a policy or measure aimed at one objective might have on other objectives, without yet evaluating the net effect on overall social welfare. Co-benefits, also referred to as ancillary benefits, depend on, among other things, local circumstances and implementation practices.The protection, care, management and maintenance of ecosystems, habitats, wildlife species and populations, within or outside of their natural environments, to safeguard the natural conditions for their long-term permanence.Illness caused by the 'severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2' (SARS-CoV-2), which was first identified amid an outbreak of respiratory illness cases in East Asia, and first reported to WHO on 31 December 2019. On 30 January 2020, WHO declared the COVID-19 outbreak a global health emergency and March 2020 a global pandemic.The process by which countries, individuals or other entities aim to achieve zero fossil carbon existence. Typically refers to a reduction of the carbon emissions associated with electricity, industry and transport.An infectious diseases caused by any one of four related viruses transmitted by mosquitoes. The dengue virus is a leading cause of illness and death in the tropic and subtropics. As many as 400 million people are infected yearly.Land degradation in arid, semi-arid and dry sub-humid areas resulting from various factors, including climatic variations and human activities. It involves crossing thresholds beyond which the underpinning ecosystem cannot restore itself but requires ever-greater external resources for recovery.; When individual land degradation processes, acting locally, combine to affect large areas of drylands.The overarching socio-economic forces that exert pressures on the state of the environment.A complex social-environmental system consisting of interacting physical, chemical, biological and social components and processes. It determines the state and evolution of the planet and life on it and the Earth ś interacting physical, chemical and biological processes. The system consists of the land, oceans, atmosphere, frozen water bodies, poles and living organisms including humans and their domestic species. It includes the planet's natural cycles and deep Earth processes (the carbon, water, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulphur and other cycles, and the energy balances).A dynamic complex of plant, animal and micro-organism communities and their non-living environment, interacting as a functional unit. Ecosystems may be small and simple, like an isolated pond, or large and complex, like a specific tropical rainforest or a coral reef in tropical seas. Ecosystems are typically embedded in larger ecosystems.A long-term reduction in an ecosystem's structure, functionality, or capacity to provide benefits to people.The conditions and processes whereby an ecosystem persists, maintains its integrity, and transforms materials and energy. Ecosystem functions include such processes as decomposition, primary and secondary production, nutrient cycling and biogeochemistry, demography, migration and evolution.The return of the structure, composition and function of an ecosystem to some desired level, from a degraded state. The desired level may be its inferred original or natural state.148Infections that have recently appeared within a population or those whose incidence or geographic range is rapidly increasing or threatens to increase in the near future.The trajectory of greenhouse gas emissions over time; typically used to describe scenarios of future emissions during the 21st century.The effect that a person, entity of activity has on the environment. It can be measured, for example, as the quantity of natural resources that they use, the amount of harmful gases that they produce or the equivalent land area required to provide those resources. In Figure 2.4, material footprint attributes all resources mobilized globally to the final consumer according to country income.The uppermost part of the ocean that receives enough sunlight to allow photosynthesis, less than 200 meters.Fairness of rights, distribution and access. Depending on context, this can refer to access to resources, services or power.The presence of people; livelihoods; species or ecosystems; environmental functions, services, and resources; infrastructure or economic, social or cultural assets in places and settings that could be adversely affected by a given stressor.A process in a system whereby a change in one part propagates through the system and ends up affecting the originating part, either by dampening the original change (negative feedbacks) or amplifying or reinforcing it (positive feedbacks). Feedbacks are responsible for system behaviors such as non-linearity of change, equilibrium (or lack thereof) and tipping points.Physical and economic access to food that meets people's dietary needs as well as their food preferences.A set of activities and actors ranging from the production to the consumption of food, including agriculture, food transformation, storage, distribution and waste disposal. It encompasses food security and its components -availability, access and utilization -and including the social and environmental outcomes of these activities.Coal, natural gas and petroleum products (such as oil) formed from the decayed bodies of animals and plants that died millions of years ago.Gender refers to the roles, behaviors, activities and attributes that a given society at a given time considers appropriate for men and women. In addition to the social attributes and opportunities associated with being male and female and the relationships between women and men and girls and boys, gender also refers to the relations between women and those between men. These attributes, opportunities and relationships are socially constructed and are learned through socialization processes. They are context and time-specific and changeable. Gender determines what is expected, allowed and valued in a woman or a man in a given context. Gender is part of the broader socio-cultural context, as are other important criteria for socio-cultural analysis including class, race, poverty level, ethnic group, sexual orientation, age, etc.Natural assets that are not owned by any particular person or entity, but are potentially used by all, such as the atmosphere, he high seas, outer space and the Antarctic.Increase in the global mean near-surface air temperature, primarily caused by increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.The act, process, or power of governing for the organization of society/ies. For example, there is governance through the state, the market, or through civil society groups and local organizations. Governance is exercised through institutions: laws, property-rights systems and forms of social organization.The value of all final goods and services produced in a country in one year. GDP can be measured by adding up all of an economy's incomes (wages, interest, profits; and rents) or expenditures (consumption, investment, government purchases) and net exports (exports minus imports).Water that flows or seeps downward and saturates soil or rock, supplying springs and wells. The upper surface of the saturated zone is called the water table.The natural home or environment of an animal, plant or other organism. It can also be used to refer terrestrial or aquatic areas distinguished by particular geographic, living and non-living features, entirely natural or semi-natural, in which some organism exists.The potential occurrence of a natural or human-induced physical event or trend or physical impact that may cause loss of life, injury, or other health impacts, as well as damage and loss to property, infrastructure, livelihoods, service provision, ecosystems and environmental resources. In this report, the term hazard usually refers to climate-related physical events or trends or their physical impacts.Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social wellbeing. It is not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.The extent to which individuals have the ability to live the kinds of lives they have reason to value; the opportunities people have to pursue their aspirations. Basic components of human well-being include: security, meeting material needs, health and social relations.Regularized patterns of interaction by which society organizes itself: the rules, practices and conventions that structure human interaction. The term is wide and encompassing, and could be taken to include law, social relationships, property rights and tenurial systems, norms, beliefs, customs and codes of conduct as much as multilateral environmental agreements, international conventions and financing mechanisms. Institutions could be formal (explicit, written, often having the sanction of the state) or informal (unwritten, implied, tacit, mutually agreed and accepted).Introduced species that have spread beyond their area of introduction, and which are frequently associated with negative impacts on the environment, human economy or human health. Rarely, it can include native species that have recently expanded their populations.A state whereby the amount and quality of land resources, necessary to support ecosystem functions and services and enhance food security, remains stable or increases within specified temporal and spatial scales and ecosystems.A long-term loss of ecosystem function and services, caused by disturbances from which the system cannot recover unaided.The exploitation of land for various human purposes or economic activities. Examples of land use categories include agriculture, industrial use, transport and protected areas. At a given moment, a given parcel of land has only one land cover (see definition), but can have many land uses.The way someone gains the resources people needed to provide for their needs, such as feed themselves and their family, obtaining clothing and a place to shelter, obtain, etc. It includes activities that earn the money that can be used for these purposes, and has cultural dimensions (\"a way of life\").Livestock Domesticated terrestrial mammals that are raised to provide a diverse array of goods and services.A tree or shrub that grows in chiefly tropical coastal swamps that are flooded at high tide. Mangroves typically have numerous tangled roots above ground and form dense thickets.Urban areas with more than 10 million inhabitants.In the context of climate change, a human intervention to reduce the sources, or enhance the sinks of greenhouse gases. Examples include using fossil fuels more efficiently for industrial processes or electricity generation, switching to solar energy or wind power, improving the insulation of buildings and expanding forests and other 'sinks' to remove greater amounts of CO2 from the atmosphere.Actions to protect, sustainably manage, and restore natural or modified ecosystems, that address societal challenges effectively and adaptively, simultaneously providing human well-being and biodiversity benefits 150Materials or substances such as minerals, forests, water and fertile land that occur in nature and can be used for economic gain.The approximately 20 chemical elements known to be essential for the growth of living organisms, such as nitrogen, sulphur, phosphorus and carbon. There are small differences between different groups of organisms regarding which elements they need, and in what proportions.Changes in the chemistry of the ocean that result in a reduction of pH. It occurs when atmospheric CO2 is absorbed by the ocean and reacts with seawater to produce acid. Although CO2 gas is naturally exchanged between the atmosphere and the oceans, the increased amounts of CO2 gas into the atmosphere as a result of human activities in modern times (e.g. burning fossil fuels) has results in seawater that is increasingly acidic.An approach to health that recognizes the interconnections between people, animals, plants and their shared environments. It is a collaborative, multisectoral and trans-disciplinary approach, working at local, regional, national and global level, to achieve optimal health and well-being outcomes.Organic agriculture A production system that sustains the health of soils, ecosystems and people. It relies on ecological processes, biodiversity and cycles adapted to local conditions, rather than the use of synthetic inputs.Bodies of individuals with a specified common objective.Organizations could be, amongst others, political groups; governments; economic organizations, federations of industry; social organizations (non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and self-help groups) or religious organizations (church and religious trusts). It is not synonymous with institutions (see definition).A region of the atmosphere situated at an altitude of 10-50 km above the Earth's surface (called the stratosphere) which contains most of the ozone in the atmospheric column, albeit in dilute concentrations.The worldwide spread of a disease. A pandemic occurs when a new highly-infective agent emerges and spreads around the world, since most people do not yet have immunity.Another name for aerosol particles. Very small (typically less than 10 mm diameter) solid particles or liquid droplets suspended in the air; see also areosols.Pathogen/Pathogen shedding rate A bacterium, virus or other microorganism that can cause disease. Shedding rate refers to emission of pathogens throughout the course of infection.A type of wetland with a very high organic carbon content (ty-pically>20%) in the sediment. Peatlands currently cover about 3% of the global land surface. The term refers to both the peat soil and the wetland habitat growing on its surface.Soil, silt and rock that remains frozen year-round for two or more years, occurring chiefly in polar or high altitude regions.Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) Chemical substances that persist in the environment, bioaccumulate through the food web, and pose a risk of causing adverse effects to human health and the environment.Any substance that causes harm when released into the atmosphere. The presence of minerals, chemicals or physical properties at levels that exceed the values deemed to define a boundary between good or acceptable and poor or unacceptable quality, which is a function of the specific pollutant.Deaths occurring earlier due to the presence of a risk factor than would occur in the absence of that risk factor. Often these risk factors are related to the environment, particularly pollution.Energy embodied in natural resources (such as coal, crude oil, sunlight or uranium) that has not undergone any anthropogenic conversion or transformation.The private sector is part of a country's economy which consists of industries and commercial companies that are not owned or controlled by the government.The act of attempting to produce a description of the future subject to assumptions about certain preconditions, or the description itself, such as \"population projections used in existing assessments vary between 8.5 billion and 10.0 billion people by 2050 and between 6.9 billion and 12.6 billion people by 2100 (Section 2.1).\"A clearly defined geographical space, recognized, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values.Scenarios are plausible descriptions of how future developments might evolve, based on a coherent and internally consistent set of assumptions about the key relationships and driving forces (box 2.1).Short-lived climate forcers refers to a set of compounds that are primarily composed of those with short lifetimes in the atmosphere compared to well-mixed greenhouse gases, and are also referred to as near-term climate forcers. This set of compounds includes methane (CH4), which is also a well-mixed greenhouse gas, as well as ozone (O3) and aerosols, or their precursors, and some halogenated species that are not well-mixed greenhouse gases. These compounds do not accumulate in the atmosphere at decadal to centennial time scales, and so their effect on climate is predominantly in the first decade after their emission, although their changes can still induce long-term climate effects such as sea level change. Their effect can be cooling or warming. A subset of exclusively warming short-lived climate forcers is referred to as short-lived climate pollutants.Any process, activity or mechanism that releases a greenhouse gas, an aerosol or a precursor of a greenhouse gas or aerosol into the atmosphere.A characteristic or state whereby the needs of the present population can be met without compromising the ability of future generations or populations in other locations to meet their needs.Sustainable Agriculture emphasizes methods and processes that improve soil productivity while minimizing harmful effects on the climate, soil, water, air, biodiversity and human health. It aims to minimize the use of inputs from nonrenewable sources and petroleum-based products and replace them with those from renewable resources; and focuses on local people and their needs, knowledge, skills, socio-cultural values and institutional structures. It aims to ensures that the basic nutritional requirements of current and future generations are met in both quantity and quality terms, and to provide long-term employment, adequate income and dignified and equal working and living conditions for everybody involved in agricultural value chains. It further sets out to reduces the agricultural sector's vulnerability to risks such as adverse natural conditions (e.g. climate) and socioeconomic factors (e.g. strong price fluctuations).Development that meets the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.These arise when two or more processes, organizations, substances or other agents interact in such a way that the outcome is greater than the sum of their individual effects considered independently.A system is a collection of component parts that interact with one another within some boundary.Physical artefacts or the bodies of knowledge of which they are an expression. Examples are water extraction structures, such as tube wells, renewable energy technologies and traditional knowledge. Technology and institutions are related. Any technology has a set of practices, rules and regulations surrounding its use, access, distribution and management.State of being transformed, or a fundamental change in the technological, economic and social organization of society, including world views, norms, values and governance. Transformation can also refer to a series of actions that explores opportunities to stop doing the things that pull the Earth System in the wrong direction and at the same time provide resources, capacity and an enabling environment for all that is consistent with the sustainable-world vision.152Non-linear, systematic and fundamental changes of the composition and functioning of a societal system with changes in structures, cultures and practices. 10 12 (1 000 000 000 000).A cognitive state of incomplete knowledge that can result from a lack of information or from disagreement about what is known or even knowable. It may have many of sources, including imprecision in the data, ambiguously defined concepts or terminology, or uncertain projections of human behaviour. Uncertainty can be represented by quantitative measures (for example, a probability of being correct) or by qualitative statements (for example, reflecting the judgement of a team of experts).An increase in the proportion of the population living in urban areas.In disease biology, the organism or vehicle that transmits the disease-causing organism from the reservoir to the host. Many vectors are bloodsucking insects and ticks, which ingest disease-producing microorganisms during a blood meal from an infected host (human or animal). Vectors can also be an animal, such as a bat, or an inanimate object.Illnesses caused by parasites, viruses and bacteria that are transmitted by mosquitoes, sandflies, triatomine bugs, blackflies, ticks, tsetse flies, mites, snails and lice.An intrinsic feature of people at risk. It is a function of exposure, sensitivity to impacts of the specific unit exposed (such as a watershed, island, household, village, city or country), and the ability or inability to cope or adapt. It is multi-dimensional, multi-disciplinary, multi-sectoral and dynamic. The exposure is to hazards such as drought, conflict or extreme price fluctuations, and also to underlying socio-economic, institutional and environmental conditions.Illnesses that are transmitted through contact with, or consumption of, contaminated water.The chemical, physical and biological characteristics of water, usually in respect to its suitability for a particular purpose.Occurs when annual water supplies drop below 1 000 m³ per person, or when more than 40 percent of available water is used.The sustainable use and protection of water systems, protection against water related hazards (floods and droughts), sustainable development of water resources and the safeguarding of (access to) water functions and services for humans and the environment.Water stress Occurs when low water supplies limit food production and economic development, and affect human health. An area is experiencing water stress when annual water supplies drop below 1 700 m³ per person.Area of marsh, fen, peatland, bog or water, whether natural or artificial, permanent or temporary, with water that is static or flowing, fresh, brackish or salt, including areas of marine water to a depth that does not exceed 6 m at low tide.Wild animals collectively; the native fauna (and sometimes flora) of a region.A flavivirus first identified in Uganda in 1947 in monkeys, transmitted primarily by Aedes mosquitoes, biting during the day. Outbreaks of Zika virus disease have been reported in Africa, Asia and the Americas. Most infected people develop mild symptoms for 2-7 days, or no symptoms, but infection during pregnancy can cause infants to be born malformations.Diseases that can spread between animals and people, moving from wild and domesticated animals to humans and from humans to animals. ","tokenCount":"43429"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0823136169.json b/data/part_2/0823136169.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..122a7c9eec283d4f3299fe0b96276170f8772892 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0823136169.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"9d55822152d5c0858e39d6de09dddd4b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/5b732543-3b67-453a-b46f-365a6a13d13f/retrieve","id":"-1929737189"},"keywords":["PEN 1","992","949"],"sieverID":"6445e2a3-b854-4ad2-a711-97654d3e3ba8","pagecount":"2","content":"Desarrollo de métodos de diagnóstico fitosanitario para asegurar la distribución y repatriación de semillas de oca, olluco, mashua y yacón libres de virus diagnósticos 100% confiables, se han empezado a desarrollar métodos más modernos, rápidos y seguros. Uno de los más promisorios es conocido con el nombre de secuenciamiento y ensamblaje de ARNs pequeños de interferencia, que consiste en secuenciar fragmentos pequeños del ARN (ácido ribonucleico) viral, y posteriormente, con el uso de herramientas bioinformáticas, ensamblar dichos fragmentos (como un rompecabezas) para reconstruir el genoma parcial o total del virus.Mayor precisión en la detección del virus. El secuenciamiento de fragmentos pequeños de ARN es costoso pero es necesario como paso previo para el desarrollo de un método de diagnóstico rutinario y de bajo costo basado enLa papa es el pilar de la seguridad alimentaria y una fuente importante de desarrollo para las comunidades altoandinas del Perú. Otras raíces y tubérculos andinos (RTAs), con nutrientes y beneficios particulares para la salud, complementan el rol alimenticio de la papa y han empezado a ganar importancia entre los agricultores y empresarios como fuentes alternativas de ingresos económicos. Y es que con los años, estos alimentos se están convirtiendo en recursos estratégicos para satisfacer la demanda creciente de alimentos funcionales. Un ejemplo son las exportaciones de productos derivados del yacón y la maca, que alcanzaron el año 2014 un valor de USD 2.9 y USD 28.7 millones, respectivamente.La diversidad de las raíces y tubérculos andinos es salvaguardada principalmente en los bancos de germoplasma del Instituto de Innovación Agraria (INIA) y del Centro Internacional de la Papa (CIP), donde se conservan más de 5,000 accesiones (semillas) colectadas en diferentes zonas del Perú. Estos materiales se desean poner a disposición de productores e investigadores; sin embargo, debido a que carecemos de herramientas de diagnóstico para las enfermedades virales, la distribución de semilla desde los bancos de germoplasma representa actualmente un alto riesgo para diseminar enfermedades, en especial las enfermedades virales.La mejor forma de conservar la diversidad es haciendo uso de ella. Por ello, con la finalidad de que tanto los agricultores, como la comunidad científica en general, puedan acceder a semillas libres de virus, el CIP y el INIA plantean un proyecto cuyo objetivo es el desarrollo de un método de diagnóstico de virus basado en tecnologías modernas de última generación. El proyecto contribuirá además a identificar los virus presentes en 1,000 accesiones de oca, olluco, mashua y yacón conservados en los bancos de germoplasma, y al mismo tiempo identificar materiales que estén libres de virus y disponibles para la distribución. Otro objetivo importante del proyecto es fortalecer las capacidades institucionales y humanas en el CIP e INIA, así como difundir el conocimiento de los resultados del proyecto a través de talleres, congresos y publicaciones científicas.Conocimiento de métodos más ágiles. En la actualidad, y debido a que la producción de nuevos antisueros demanda muchos años y dinero, y no hay garantía de Las raíces y tubérculos andinos han empezado a ganar importancia como fuentes alternativas de ingresos económicos para las comunidades altoandinas. Debido a la carencia de herramientas de diagnóstico fitosanitario, la distribución de semilla representa actualmente un alto riesgo para diseminar enfermedades. Este proyecto contribuirá a: (i) desarrollar un método de diagnóstico rápido y de bajo costo para los principales virus en oca, olluco, mashua y yacón, (ii) identificar los virus presentes en 1.000 accesiones conservados en los bancos de germoplasma del CIP y del INIA, y (iii) poner a disposición para la distribución aquellas accesiones que resulten libres de virus. PCR (por sus siglas en inglés Polymerase Chain Reaction). Con el genoma secuenciado de un virus en particular, se diseñan posteriormente cebadores o primers (pequeñas secuencias de ADN) que reconocen regiones muy específicas del genoma del virus, con lo cual se puede lograr un diagnóstico muy preciso y rápido. El diseño de primers es la clave para desarrollar los métodos de diagnóstico de los virus.Virus identificados. Mediante el uso de pruebas serológicas y antisueros específicos, en el pasado se han podido identificar 4 especies de virus en oca, 8 en olluco, 4 en mashua y 2 en yacón. El presente proyecto permitirá contar con un método de diagnóstico basado en PCR que facilitará la identificación de dichos virus, pero muy probablemente también de virus nuevos que aun desconocemos.• Un método de diagnóstico, rápido y de bajo costo, basado en PCR para identificar los virus en materiales de oca, olluco, mashua y yacón; incluyendo un manual de laboratorio de acceso libre para el diagnóstico de virus en los cuatro cultivos.• Estado fitosanitario identificado en 1.200 accesiones de oca, olluco, mashua y yacón conservadas en los bancos de germoplasma del CIP y del INIA.• Un stock de accesiones de raíces y tubérculos andinos libres de virus, disponibles para la distribución, en especial a investigadores y agricultores, contribuyendo así a la repatriación de estas variedades a sus hábitats naturales. A su vez, generará oportunidades comerciales basadas en el uso de la diversidad de estos cultivos.• Un programa de terapias inicial para la eliminación de virus en las accesiones que resulten positivas al diagnóstico de virus.• Hasta la fecha se han identificado 40 posibles géneros virales en oca, 26 en olluco, 16 en mashua y 7 en yacón. Los géneros más conspicuos son Allexivirus, Badnavirus, Caulimovirus, Cytorhabdovirus, Nepovirus, Polerovirus, Potexvirus, Potyvirus, Potexvirus, Umbravirus e Ilarvirus. Además se han diseñado primers para todos los virus considerados prioritarios, para completar regiones de los genomas virales identificados y para estandarizar métodos de diagnóstico basados en PCR.• Investigadores y técnicos del INIA, CIP y al menos dos universidades, capacitados en las técnicas de diagnóstico viral.• Una tesis de doctorado y otra de maestría.• Al menos dos artículos científicos publicados. El paso a paso del proyecto 2 3 4 5 6","tokenCount":"958"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0850320871.json b/data/part_2/0850320871.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b08d52d896b595e48b541dcd75dff322680fdf0f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0850320871.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"9d8898534806e7774a9df3ed165bcfea","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/244fd3a1-2e2d-4e95-9237-f7d8e80383bb/retrieve","id":"788754667"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"569f9d69-f74c-46b5-b72f-d3620495110b","pagecount":"2","content":"Project Title: P344 -Evidence of impacts, impact pathways, synergies and cost-effectiveness of nutrition-sensitive agricultural programsThe Nutrition Embedded Evaluation Program Impact Evaluation (NEEP-IE) used a cluster-RCT design to examine the effectiveness of using a community-based ECD center as a platform in Malawi to promote household production and consumption diversity, improve caregiver knowledge and practices of nutrition and infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices, and improve diets and nutrition among preschoolers and their younger siblings The World Bank and the Government of Malawi agreed in June 2018 to scale-up a nutrition-sensitive intervention based on results from an IFPRI-led impact evaluation which showed that preschools can be an effective platform for delivering a nutrition-sensitive agricultural intervention. This will start in 2019.• Save the Children • The World Bank• 16 -Optimized consumption of diverse nutrient-rich foods 1 This report was generated on 2022-08-19 at 08:28 (GMT+0)","tokenCount":"143"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0856464439.json b/data/part_2/0856464439.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c4f614562fb80836839fdf8b4ee8a9615cc003c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0856464439.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4a8ccb2f3cbb270053e468c31cbd9e8b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/4653cfde-994e-4ae8-8958-9e664cc58562/retrieve","id":"910104778"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"3bde6686-d6d4-4b30-9ea5-6dc29b397a00","pagecount":"69","content":"Resilient Cities Through Sustainable Urban and Peri-urban Agrifood Systems (known as Resilient Cities) is a new research for development Initiative of the One CGIAR which aims to support a vibrant, largely informal urban and peri-urban agrifood sector, to help improve sustainability, equity and opportunity growth , and to mitigate risks to human and environmental health. During its first phase, the Initiative is primarily working in cities of Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Peru and the Philippines. Resilient Cities is being implemented by five CGIAR Centers -CIP (lead), IFPRI, IITA, IRRI, IWMI -as well as R&D partners World Vegetable Center and RUAF.The reports and publications generated through the Initiative contribute important development information to the public arena. Readers are encouraged to quote or reproduce material from them in their own publications. As copyright holder CIP/Resilient Cities requests acknowledgement and a copy of the publication where the citation or material appears.Please send a copy to the Communications Department at the address below.Table 2 . Summary characteristics of pilot cities (Quezon City and Pasay City) . . . . . . . . . . . Table 3 . Top 10 ranking of highly urbanized cities (HUCs), 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 4 . Annual per capita consumption of food commodities in the Philippines . . . . . . . . Table 5 . Vegetable production in different zones in the Philippines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 6 . Vegetables traded in wholesale and retail markets (English, common and . . . . . . scientific names) and main supply areas Table 7 . Urban and peri-urban farms and gardens, markets and uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 8 . Profile of the informal vegetable vendors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 9 . Business information about informal vendors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Informal Food Markets in Quezon City and Pasay City, Philippines: A Rapid Assessment iv Table 10 . Summative food supply and market chains involving informal vegetable . . . . . . . vending Table 11 . Challenges and opportunities in the vegetable supply chain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 12 . Supply sources of vegetables (%) sold by vendors in Pasay and Quezon City . . . . markets Table 13 . Average prices (PhP/kg) and margins (%) of common vegetables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . contributing to bigger share of sales and income Table 14 . Types of street food sold in Pasay and Quezon City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 15 . Profile of street food vendors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 16 . Street food vendors: business location, challenges and outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table17 . Summative supply and market chains of the informal street food vending . . . . . . The study on the informal food markets has been positively received by relevant agencies and city governments approached for the rapid assessment of the informal food vendors in the focused sites -Pasay and Quezon City. We sincerely appreciate the strong support particularly of the offices of the mayors of Pasay and Quezon City through the facilitation and interviews with the Chief of Staff Mr. Peter Eric D. Pardo and team, Pasay City; Mr. Emmanuel Hugh Velasco II and team of Sustainable Development Affairs Unit, Quezon City; the active participation of Mr. Roger Tamondong, supervisor of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) of the Department of Education; Mr. Glenn Panganiban, chair of National Urban and Peri-urban Agriculture Program (NUPAP)-Bureau of Plant Industry and director of High Value Commercial Crops, and Mr. Ramon Niedra of the Agriculture Marketing Assistance Support of the Department of Agriculture with their respective staff. Also, great appreciation for the zeal and hospitality of the focal officials of the community and school gardens-Mr. Wally Canque of Holy Spirit Community Garden; Mr. Silverio Estorco, principal of San Diego Elementary School; Mr. Jun Ogot, principal of Commonwealth High School; and Mr. Geoffrey Echanis of old Balara Elementary School.Special thanks to the former director of the Agriculture Training Institute, Department of Agriculture, Dr. Rosana Mula and staff in the facilitation and provision of venue for the focus group discussion with key officials of the NUPAP, and support staff for the key informant interviews: Mr. Jomar Tabor, Ms. Janina Villafuerte, Mr. Justin Paolo Interno and Ms. Lyka Mercader. Most importantly to scores of vendors and officials in Padre Rada-Divisoria, Pasay and Quezon City markets who shared valuable time and information during the market visits.On the whole, this should not have been possible without the assistance of Ms. Arma Bertuso, Resilient Cities Focal Person (Philippines), for the overall facilitation and active participation in interviewing; the guidance of Dr. Gordon Prain, Resilient Cities Senior Advisor, for providing detailed comments and suggestions for revising an earlier version of the report; and the joint leadership to the Initiative provided by Dr. Simon Heck and Dr. Silvia Alonso.As part of this initiative, the CIPimplemented Philippine project aims to improve urban food systems by strengthening enterprise capacities of informal vendors, thereby helping to improve food supply and diets of the urban populace and securing economic opportunities, especially for the urban poor. This initial study reports findings from an assessment of the participation of informal food vendors in the agrifood systems of two Metro Manila pilot cities in order to contribute to the design of capacity development interventions in the next phase.Findings show that informal food vendors play a significant role in food provisioning, livelihood and income generation across the food chain. They are found to be key links between multiple food production locations and consumers in primary, secondary, and satellite markets, especially benefiting the urban poor. Recognizing these, city governments started policy initiatives to improve the functioning of informal vendors in market spaces, coming up with options that address issues on relocation, regularization, and marketing. At this point, though, it is still largely a work in progress. Evidence suggests a greater likelihood of informal food vendors contributing to resilient cities by strengthening their enterprise skills and giving them access to information, innovation, and support services to improve selling practices, sanitation and hygiene, and make nutrient-sensitive food chain improvements. Based on these, it is proposed that designs for developing the capacity of this sector involve the adaptation of the CIP-developed Farmer Business School into the Vendor Business School, integrating the capacity and learning needs of informal vendors in partnership with city governments and stakeholders.T he One CGIAR Initiative on \"Resilient Cities through Sustainable Urban and Peri-Urban Agrifood Systems\" aims to strengthen evidence and capacities for improving management of urban food systems in Africa, Asia, and Latin America through access to technology, skills, and information to improve diets and livelihoods of a fastgrowing global urban populace while reducing environmental footprints. Securing a productive, healthy population in resiliently green urban spaces has become a global priority. The sciencebased resilient cities initiative has identified five key entry immediate action points: more efficient and safer urban/ peri-urban food production, improved urban food markets and supply chains, innovative circular bio-economy, improved urban food environments for healthier urban diets, and support of research and innovative capacity development systems.In the Philippines, the research focus of the Initiative in the first year is on efficient and safe food production and inclusive profitable informal markets, both with Metro Manila as the focus area. The current report addresses the issue of improving the efficiency of the marketing side of the urban agrifood system. The informal food market, which is a large part of the urban informal economy, is the priority sector being addressed with the end goal of improving urban food systems through capacity development that will strengthen enterprise skills and ensure access to technologies, information, and business support services, thus, improving the food supply and diets of the urban populace while reducing environmental footprints in the urban food system.The iconic view of vibrant city streets and markets presents scores of ambulant vendors of food, wares, and crafts, along with agricultural produce such as fruits and vegetables-the informal market sector, unregistered and outside the purview of public services and assistance. Yet, it increasingly plays a significant role in the urban economy in terms of livelihood, employment, food provision, and potential contribution to the resiliency and sustainability of cities. The urban food economy is affected by a range of activities from farm to table. Taking the urban informal food sector as a take-off point toward establishing resilient cities requires that it be viewed from an agrifood system perspective. It needs to be understood within the context of urbanization and the related issues of unemployment, poverty, food insecurity, congested settlements and whether cities are able to prepare and recover for future shocks (e.g., economic, social, institutional, environmental). The informal market sector, because of its enormous economic importance in cities of the Global South, needs to be included in public sector planning, policymaking, and program design (ILO 2018, UN 2021, Tefft et al. 2017): that is, informal markets are ubiquitous but exist beyond the purview of public sector policy and action.Like in most countries in Asia, the rate of urbanization in the Philippines is expected to increase over the next 20 years (UN-Habitat 2022). Metro Manila is classified as 100% urban, even though there are agricultural areas in the fringes. The rest of the country's population is expected to be 60% urban within the decade (PSA 2020). But the economic growth and dynamism of Metro Manila have not been effectively translated into health and wellbeing. The existing food system in Metro Manila may be described as dysfunctional. People suffer from a \"triple burden\" of malnutrition. About 33% of children under 5 are stunted, 30% of adults over 20 are overweight or obese, and 20% of children below 5 are suffering from Vitamin A deficiency or \"hidden hunger\". Moreover, about 67% of households do not meet their calorie requirement (FNRI 2017(FNRI , 2018)). The farmers and fisher folk who feed Metro Manila are suffering, are getting old (average age, 58), and are not being replaced as the young generation does not want to engage in farming. The reasons are complex. Land and water resources are in short supply with competing uses for housing, farming, and commercial, and industrial purposes. Multiple-use component effluents of the food system (e.g., fertilizers, pesticides, antibiotics, growth promoters, plastic packaging) are causing pollution in rivers; in Laguna de Bay and Manila Bay, the waters have become unsafe for people and aquatic life. Soil quality in the farms continues to deteriorate. Climate change remains a threat. The current food system, which is dependent on imports and long supply chains, contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions and is deemed inadequately prepared to adapt to shocks (PSA 2022).As in other megacities, food is critically high on the development agenda but is being challenged by urbanization trends, growing markets, poverty, food and nutrient insecurity, rising food prices, growing dependence on food imports, and challenges posed by climate change. Such a complexity requires new ways of thinking from various actors who have, in the past, been less engaged in foodand agriculture-related decisions; these actors include urban planners and local and regional authorities. For resilient urban food systems, diverse sources of food supply are needed: from the traditional long rural-urban supply chains across regions to newly emerging urban and peri-urban short supply chains. Markets, as part of the urban agrifood system, offer rich opportunities for resource recovery (waste management) and plowback to urban food production (soil bio-enhancers, bio-pesticides) or energy sourcing (waste to energy) or climate change adaptation (idle areas converted to tree parks or community gardens). Urban food systems have increasingly become an important driver for a number of urban policies such as food security, livelihood generation, social welfare, health and nutrition, education, environment, waste management, and disaster risk reduction (Pasay, Quezon City 2022, DA-ATI 1998;FAO 2020;UN 2021).To establish a resilient city, this Initiative is a small contribution to the whole gamut of interwoven actions that are required in the short, intermediate, and long term. The informal food sector as the entry point, however, is significant since it is often absent in planning and policymaking and is subject to conflicting views among local and national authorities. Yet, this sector is numerically large and continuously contributes to income and livelihood to a vast population of urban women and youth. Furthermore, it provides convenient, affordable, and tasty food to poorly paid construction workers, public and private workers, and no-kitchen households in slums and congested residential areas. It is also a vital food supply during emergencies and disasters (Alderslade et al. 2006, FAO 2007, Tshofuti 2016, World Bank 2017, Smith et al. 2019).This pilot initiative is a determined effort to use soft technology on innovative capacity development of informal food vendors by honing their business skills and enhancing their consciousness as to their significant contribution in terms of improved nutrition, social and environmental health and protection, economic growth (through employment, income, marketing ancillaries), and food security, especially for the less endowed majority of urban workers and residents. This is also an exercise of partnership: in implementing a collaborative participatory process of working out interventions in the agrifood system. The learnings are understood as process and inputs for further improvements to be used for adaptation and scaling out later, eventually contributing to a resilient Metro Manila.The study generally aims to understand the participation of the informal market vendors of vegetables and street foods in the market system in Metro Manila in order to define their role and contribution to the urban food system. Specifically, with the identified target sector, the study seeks to (1) define the different related subsystems and their characteristics, the types of actors and stakeholders and their relationships, governance issues, challenges and opportunities; (2) identify areas for improvement or learning needs that can be addressed through the capacity development process of a vendor business school; and (3) provide options to improve guidance and conduct of the vendor business school.The project is designed within the agrifood system approach, deemed appropriate considering that this involves a range of dimensions from production, storage, value addition, distribution, and consumption, which will be affected by climate change with increasing frequency and intensity of weather events (FAO 2020, Tacoli et al. 2013, Godschalk 2003). With the project's focus on informal food markets where a chain of relationships from suppliers to consumers is important, a system perspective would be relevant. Related concepts of food security and urbanization put an understanding of the priority focus in context.Food security is understood as the outcome of effective food systems: the consequence of the interplay among activities, processes, and governance from farm to plate. During the post-1996 World Food Summit, food security has shifted to a broader understanding of four key dimensions: availability, access, utilization, and stability. The emphasis is not only on food supply and production but also on affordability (purchasing power) and access (market links and infrastructure, logistics), nutrient adequacy and food safety (including culture and habit preferences), and ability to bounce back from socioeconomic and environmental shocks (FAO 2013). The Philippines, in its Agriculture and Fisheries Modernization Act (AFMA) (Republic Act 8435) of 1997, has adopted this FAO definition. The ensuing programs and promulgations, however, did not reflect a clear a understanding of the full concept, and thus, the priority swings: food selfsufficiency on staples, especially rice, dominatess the programming agenda and budget allocation.Metro Manila is a composite of 16 highly urbanized cities and one municipality (Table 1). The project is limited to two pilot sites: the biggest city and smallest city in population and area, Quezon City and Pasay City, respectively. Selection and characterization are detailed in later sections.The target sectors are the informal food vendors of vegetables and street food (representing animal-based products) in the focus Metro Manila pilot sites. Vegetables and animal-based street food constitute a significant part of the informal food market. Vegetables and street food vending is a strategic focus because of the number of poor people (especially women and youth) who are involved (PSA 2019(PSA , 2022;;Bersales and Llarina 2019). This is supported by observations on the streets of Metro Manila.A rapid food system assessment approach was adopted for the study. Rapid assessment deals with limited or a more focused segment of the food system. Extended assessment covers more food system issues and deals with the specificities of diverse actors and their functions in the food system in detail to identify systemwide interventions (Tefft et al. 2017, Skinner and Harvey 2018, Peter and Batt 2022). The current study uses modular rapid assessment because this focuses on the informal food market sector of the urban economy. The food market chain analytical framework is used on the descriptive characterization of activities, functions, and relationships of informal vendors (vegetables and street food), together with governance in relation to policies, regulations, and initiatives on urban food security and the environment.The study was carried out in two stages (Annex 1). The first step was the selection of pilot sites from two of the 16 cities of Metro Manila using three criteria:(1) bigger markets serving a bigger population with the likelihood of serving a bigger share of low-to middle-income class households, (2) greater links to/ experience in urban agriculture initiatives with the DA and/or private sector, and(3) more progressive local government leadership and/or \"greater likelihood of effective facilitation for the piloting of the capacity-building approachthe vendor business school\". A 4-day rapid market appraisal was done in the markets of the selected cities of Pasay and Quezon City. Thirty informal food vendors (n=20 for vegetables; n=10 street food) in Quezon City and Pasay City were interviewed to characterize and assess the existing supply market chains-conditions of operations, practices, commodities and food sold, benefits from the business, manner of governance, and challenges and opportunities. As links in the agrifood system, these vendors bring food initially produced in far-flung and nearby farms, some of them processed, to the tables of the urban poor and, hugely, directly to their work places. Importantly, they serve customers who may not be able to conveniently source food from markets and prepare these at home. An increasing number of consumers join the millions of those who have food away from home (FAFH) for various reasons, mainly economic and for convenience. In the process, their learning needs were assessed to identify specific areas for capacity development to enhance operations, enabling greatercontribution to food and nutrition security and to the city's resilience. Earlier, initial information in the context of governance would be further explored in relation to the informal food sector at the chosen sites.Inasmuch as selection of key informants was purposive due to time constraints, the findings cannot be considered as representative of all markets (12 markets in Pasay City; 34 markets in Quezon City, 41 talipapa). However, confidence in results can be enhanced because of the inclusion of the main markets in the survey.The informal food market sector and food securityHalf a century after British anthropologist Keith Hart's research on the \"economy of the street\" in Accra, Ghana (1973), interest in the informal sector (understood as unregistered economic activity) has increased. There is growing literature on theoretical and empirical issues regarding definitions, distinctions, and measurements giving rise to a \"shadow or hidden economy, \" elaborating on the survival and living strategies of the urban poor in African Latin American, and Asian cities. This underground informal economy was \"an overwhelming and enduring reality. \" For decades, the informal sector has been misunderstood as \"lost taxes, unfair competition, public service burden, street trash, and public health concerns, \" not an important part of the local economy. They are the forgotten lot in urban planning, policies, and programs (Smith et al. 2019, Skinner et al. 2018, FAO 2007, Alderslade et al. 2006). The understanding of the urban informal economy has advanced significantly since then with the International Labour Organization (ILO), the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and other organizations supporting further research and discussions from the primitive descriptive and dualistic definitions of the early 1970s to the mounting evidence of persistent growth of the urban informal sector and its critical role in rapid urbanization performed by its diverse subsectors (e.g., low-paid unregistered labor, ambulant food vendors, street artists, dry good peddlers, garbage pickers).The term \"informal sector\" has been widely applied to describe loosely organized and unregistered activities in the rapidly growing cities of the developing world. They are often overlooked and not considered in policy and program formulation. Documented evidence in a growing literature has reversed perceptions of the informal sector as \"drivers of wealth, enterprise, and stability in communities. \" The informal market vendors are integrated into the urban food systems, playing a significant role in food distribution by providing poor urban households with better opportunities to secure food and generating livelihood for the otherwise unemployed women, men, and youth (Scott 2007). The Food Insecurity Experience Scale of the FAO estimates that food insecurity in urban areas, especially in low-income countries, is higher at 50% than in rural areas, 43%. In urban slums, this is estimated to be higher at 90%. There is also increasing literature on the informal food sector in developed economies as well (FAO 2021(FAO , 2007;;UNHSP 2017;World Bank 2017).Street food comprises a huge part of the informal food sector. It refers to a \"wide range of ready-to-eat food and beverages that are prepared and/or sold by itinerant or stationary vendors on streets and other public places\" as defined during the FAO regional workshop on street foods in Jogjakarta, Indonesia in 1986 (Winarno andAllain 1991). Street food has become a global phenomenon in both developing and developed countries (Imatheu 2017, UNHSP 2017). Globally, as well as in the Philippines, FAFH is increasingly the trend in food consumption, especially in cities with food preparation seriously limited by time and transport constraints to work or school. A systematic review of evidence about the contribution of street food to diets estimated that it contributes between 13% and 50% of food for adults in LMICs and from 13% to 40% among children (Steyn et al. 2014) Argenti (2000), attributing the trend to pressures of urbanization. Households have very limited time to prepare food, which tends to change food-buying and -consuming behavior. Also, with urban food budgets higher at least 30% than those in rural areas, this increases the demand for convenient processed meals even among the non-poor.With vendors often lacking knowledge of food safety, hygiene, or sanitation and sometimes being obliged to work/ sell under unsanitary conditions, issues of food quality (including nutrient content), hygiene, and safety in terms of inputs and water quality in processing have increasingly been raised (Gupta et al. 2016). Many food-borne diseases in low-income countries have been traced to food sold in informal markets with perishable food, improper use of additives (e.g., coloring agents, preservatives), food adulteration, contamination, and lack of sanitation in informal food marketing (Skinner et al. 2018, Azanza et al. 2000). But when properly managed, street food can enhance the quality of urban public space as they play important roles in food provision and livelihood in cities, usually benefiting women (Tefft et al. 2017, UNHSP 2017, FAO 2007).The informal food market is a significant subsector of the urban agrifood system and the urban economy in general.Following the CGIAR-CIP initiative perspective, interventions for improving the informal food markets need to be contextualized within the process toward resilient cities. The vast and growing body of literature on urban resilience recognizes the interconnectivity of sectors in an urban system and must be integrated, not dealt with sectorally per se. With increasing global urbanization projected at 70% by 2050, cities will be threatened by a myriad of issues: housing, food security, water access, energy, employment, economic uncertainty, and social conflict, among others (Smith et al. 2019, Tacoli et al. 2013). Thus, the perspective of the agrifood system is central in the initiative related to informal food markets. While having a focus, a system's view is maintained. A central issue of urban resilience is food resilience.The discourse on resilience is evolving, as well as the cadre of expertise across disciplines: from the natural to the social sciences, urban planning and public administration, and ecological and engineering thrusts, among others. From the traditional view of resilience in the 1960s, which is the \"ability to bounce back and recover from shocks, \" to the more flexible and expanded view that recognizes the power of man's ability to transform the environment, and the system's ability, by human agency, to \"adjust in the face of changing conditions, \" resilience of cities as a target has been understood as complex. The pilot cities: a briefer Interestingly, the informal vegetable and street food vendors in both Quezon City and Pasay City can substantially meet the kitchen and food needs of these dynamic cities with a huge working population who subsist on ready-to-eat/prepared or street food. These are construction workers, students, and employees in malls/shops, other institutions, and offices. Vendors report how the construction boom during the pandemic as well as the need for having food sources closer to households contributed to the growth of the informal vegetable and food sector. City officials describe how the cities try to maintain a compassionate attitude toward those involved in the informal market sector, trying to ease pressure to enable them to pursue regular business activities and exploring ways to provide services to them. They recognize that while taxes are not paid in their current status, they are important political constituents who earn livelihood that returns income to the city through their purchasing power and consumption multiplier effect. Largely, market improvement is a work in progress (Quezon and Pasay city profiles 2002, personal interviews with market officials).Markets may be classified as primary, secondary, and satellite or talipapa. They can be publicly or privately owned and/ or managed. For the purpose of this study, the markets that were surveyed are described (Annex 3).The major markets are known as bagsakan ('drop off point') wholesale markets and have the following characteristics:• Consist of large complex spaces with a huge number of wholesale and retail operators and establishments • Include warehouses or bodegas for storage • Operate actively at night, mainly between 8:00 pm and midnight, when stocks of goods are delivered by trucks in big volumes • Goods in bulk are delivered, cleaned, and packed for delivery to wholesalers/retailers and institutional buyers (restaurants, hotels) to secondary and other markets in Metro Manila, provinces, cities, and municipalities up to about 3:00 pmRetailing along the sidewalks and/or road islands stretching along the main highway goes on at the same time as wholesale activities. The hustle and bustle of market people cleaning, sorting, packing, and selling their products and hauling them away in trikes (motorized tricycles) that whiz through a myriad of people is impressive. YouTube videos can be accessed documenting the action. Two major bagsakan markets are the Divisoria Terminal Market in Manila and the Balintawak Cloverleaf Market in Caloocan City (Figure 2).The Divisoria Terminal Market, the largest and considered the main market in Metro Manila, is located in Tondo, a major commercial district. Its proximity to North Harbor (for Visayas and Mindanao products) and easy access to Luzon provinces made it the biggest trading hub in the region. Consolidatortraders from the provinces bring their commodities (e.g., vegetables, fruits) directly to wholesalers in Divisoria. All trading of commodities provides the required volume for delivery to secondary medium and large retail markets in Metro Manila, and other provinces, cities, and municipalities.Divisoria has four major specialty markets: Asuncion market, with wholesale trading of fruits and root crops; Padre Rada market, divided between one building selling tomato and sweet potato wholesale and another building engaged in selling tropical vegetables such as eggplant, squash, string beans, green papaya, leafy vegetables, calamansi, onion, and ginger; El Cano Public Market, mainly on fish and meat; and the Divisoria public market utilizing a 9,000-sq-m old building for retail sale of vegetables, wholesale and retail sales of fruits, and wholesale trading of plastic toys and native products.Based on the author's personal experience, the physical and administrative organization of Divisoria market has shown considerable improvement since the 1980s-1990s. Stalls are relatively clean and orderly and arranged in such a way that buyers and vehicles can pass through the streets during the bagsakan peak hours. The wholesaler-retailers sell their wares mostly just near their warehouses; the retailers sell along the road island stretch. Many retailers are actually sub-units of the main wholesalers, selling on a percentage basis vegetables from the highland (onions, garlic, tomato) and other high-value produce. Those who are independent are informal vendors who sell a mixture of vegetables, many of which are greens coming from peri-urban farms. They operate a little longer than the main wholesalers, up to about 5:00 am, after which they continue selling in secondary markets and/or talipapa. The road island selling should be done by that time, ready for another day of business.Divisoria market buildings are privately owned and trader businessmen pay a monthly rent for their stalls and warehouses. They also register and get a business permit from the city of Manila.The city oversees the orderly operations of the market 24 hours, 7 days a week. The barangay maintains a 24/7 office in the market also, which is manned by a barangay tanod (peacekeeping official of the village). This person collects PhP 20 (US$0.4) in the morning and evening from informal vendors, the cost of 'tickets' for morning and evening trading. The money is remitted to the city treasurer. This charge is well known as the \"etnebetneb\" (the reverse spelling of bente-bente, meaning twenty-twenty in English). This catch-phrase for the daily trading ticket was coined by a popular former mayor, who came up with words and phrases that touched the hearts and minds of ordinary people while pushing through new policies and regulations. The local leadership has been quite successful in improving the Divisoria market in terms of cleanliness, orderliness, and efficient administration.The market has a system of garbage and waste collection, which in itself is an income source to pickers and handlers who collect trash/garbage from the sellers (i.e., paid by the sack depending on size) and deliver these to the main garbage truck. This waste management system needs further assessment to effect improvements, guide policymaking, and become a useful tool to sustain agrifood market systems.The Balintawak Cloverleaf market is located on the border of Quezon City and Caloocan City and is mainly accessed by nearby secondary and satellite markets, especially those of the Quezon city markets. It is a complex of 11 different markets of wet and dry goods along Epifanio de los Santos Avenue (EDSA). Agricultural products from areas north and south of Metro Manila are delivered in volumes, driving prices low.The schedules and night market activities practiced in Balintawak are the same as those in Divisoria.The Balintawak Cloverleaf market and Mega-Q Mart are major trading areas along EDSA. Goods are distributed to secondary wholesale/retail outlets in eight public markets, 29 private markets, and 31 talipapa in Quezon City (Figure 2). Kamuning is a public market that is traditionally popular for textile/fabrics and related goods/finished products, but it also has a thriving vegetable and fruit section. The city government, through its Market Development and Administration Department, recently had groundbreaking activity for the construction of a threestorey Kamuning public market. This aims to provide better space for both vendors and market goers.Along sidewalks and at strategic peripheries of both Commonwealth and Kamuning markets, informal market vendors operate. Direct observations of market practices of vendors and waste management and infrastructure, including sanitation, highlight the issue of hygiene in many markets, public and private. The dismal reputation of markets for poor sanitation was, to some extent, confirmed through studies of contamination of vegetables as well as of money (paper and coins) circulating in markets. Bacterial and parasitic contamination was detected in 45% of vegetable samples from selected Metro Manila markets (Su et al. 2012). In a later study, 70% of paper money samples were found to have bacterial contamination (Su et al. 2015). Because of extensive trading of vegetables among various markets, large-scale contamination is possible, an alarming scenario considering the risk of disease incidence. While a recent survey indicates better vegetable handling, merchandising, and packaging in markets, a large room for improvement exists (Su et al. 2012). The informal market vendors are in a more precarious situation as access to water may not be adequate in their places of business. The potential for interventions lies in all market levels, including the informal market vendors, in particular, improving vendors' knowledge and understanding of the basics in food hygiene, sanitation, and related health issues; improving practices and skills to implement them; and providing support services to sustain such efforts.A transformation of vendor knowledge, attitude, and behavior is imperative.The informal vendors thrive abundantly in the talipapa or satellite markets, which are strategically located in the barangay. The Filipino food culture is rice-based (or maize-based in Mindanao, Cebu) with fish or meat as viands, cooked with Malay, Chinese, Spanish, and American influences. Filipinos on the average consume rice at 110 kg per capita per year. Among regions, CAR (Cordillera Administrative Region) had the highest consumption, especially with their heirloom rice; the Zamboanga Peninsula and Central Visayas consumed more of corn, at 160 kg per capita. NCR would be just about the average, but it is low on the supplemental staples, camote and cassava (Table 4). Bread has become very popular for breakfast and snacks. Food is mostly non-spicy.Vegetables The The marketing of vegetables goes through a complex chain of intermediary actors from farm to final consumers (i.e., households, institutional buyers). Figure 3 shows the flow of goods from producers to consolidator-traders who bring the produce to the wholesalers in Manila.Long supply chains (green arrows) usually refer to vegetables from the Cordillera highlands ( Balintawak and Commonwealth matters to reduce logistics cost.To informal vendors, other factors are also important, like the suki system, usually with embedded services like credit and/ or financing and filial relationships with some vegetable sources (i.e., relatives, friends). Vendors can also get price discounts from their suki supplier.The specialty production areas may be regarded as peri-urban farms or gardens that produce vegetables like cabbage, lettuce, mushrooms, eggplant, and okra.Innovative farming landscapes are geared toward agro-ecotourism, integrated organic vegetable production with livestock, and school and community gardens (Table 7). The schematic flow of the supply chains is shown in Figure 3.The observed vegetable supply chains in Metro Manila are indicated in Figure 3:1. The long supply chains (green arrows) link rural producers to wholesalers and retailers (in the primary and secondary markets) The vegetable supply chains continue to evolve, considering the impact of the pandemic: high cost of logistics, increasing consciousness for convenience, food safety and health. As per survey interviews, the fast emergence of e-marketing and social media-based food chains during the pandemic has caused informal vendors to worry about how these trends could encroach on their vegetable sales.The informal vegetable vendors are a large part of the retailers' sector. For example, inside the Pasay city public market, only six regular stall owners are officially registered/licensed as vegetable sellers.Along sidewalks and in makeshift stalls in privately owned talipapa in barangays 91 and 92, more than a score of ambulant vendors has been operating daily for at least 2 years; some are doing so for 10 years or more, continuing their parents' or relatives' vegetable business. They are not registered with the city, but they give PhP 20 payment daily to the market inspector (remitted to the city treasurer), stall rent to the private land owner at PhP 100-600 per day, depending on stall size, and some amount for utilities like electricity. Permission to locate and sell in the talipapa is sought from the barangay captain.Informal vegetable vendors are commonly found in the fringes and sidewalks near private and public markets in Pasay and Quezon City, construction sites, and barangay talipapa.The vendors interviewed are mainly long-time residents in Metro Manila; some originally come from the island provinces in the Visayas (Leyte) and from places south of NCR (Masbate) who came to Manila seeking better livelihood opportunities (Table 8). While it may be said that these vendors operate on a day-to-day basis (as they are not officially registered), almost half have been in the business for 20 years or more. Vendors in Quezon City have been longer established: 7 out of 10 have been doing business for more than 20 years, with two interviewees for more than 40 years. In Pasay, 7 of 10 have been working as vendors for 20 years or less (Table 8). Some have intergenerational succession in the location and operation of business; they initially work as helpers of their parents or uncles/aunts and they then continue the business afterward. Given the limited sample, this trend needs further exploration as literature suggests that blocks and ambulant vegetable vendors occupy an easily accessible stretch of stalls, about 90% pay a daily rent to the owner of the place. Stalls are makeshift with rent at PhP 100/sq m (Table 9).All the vendors interviewed have a positive opinion about their business as a means of livelihood. Though still recovering from slow business, even loss, during the pandemic, they were able to survive even without support for business during these difficult times. Considering that Pasay is a heavily populated area, vendors were able to attract new customers from nearby residences during the lockdowns. However, vendors whose stalls are in secluded locations, like those in Kamuning and Commonwealth markets, had low sales, forcing some vendors in Kamuning to quit the business. Meanwhile, the pandemic also brought in new informal vendors along the highways or sidewalks, which are more accessible to customers. They look forward to government support in the near future by way of funding and training assistance. They would like some capital inputs as assistance to tide them over.The high cost of vegetables, together with perishability problems and customer attitude pose challenges (Table 9). The pandemic made big markets like Mega-Q Mart and some vendors to sell online, which brought some competition to the informal sellers. These developments need to be further assessed vis-à-vis plans by the city governments of relocation and regularization of the informal vendors.In conjunction with Figure 3, Table 10 further describes the production to consumption chain of the agrifood system where the informal vegetable vendors in the pilot sites are enmeshed.The directional green and red arrows in Figure 3 correspond to the long and short vegetable supply chains specified in the green and red cells in Table 10 as linked to the different types of markets in the pilot sites. The informal vendors are largely visible in these chains and not in the institutional supply chain.A diverse variety of vegetables (Table 6) grown according to suitable agroecologies come from CAR (highland vegetables), other northern regions (Ilocos and Central Luzon), lowland/upland vegetables), and around Metro Manila (CALABARZON, lowland vegetables). These are delivered to primary wholesale markets, which find their way to secondary, and then to satellite markets. As previously noted, informal vegetable vendors are firmly integrated in the secondary markets and strongly integrated in satellite markets (Table 10). In the night market, they are also active in the primary bagsakan along road sections; they then transfer to the secondary or satellite markets during daytime. As informal sellers, they follow longer food supply chains than big distributors and thus form an essential link from the farm to the table. Urban residents, restaurants, canteens, and small eateries near vendors' locations can buy relatively cheaper fresh vegetables compared with those offered in the malls. Some of the informal vendors with stalls have mobile carts that peddle around the streets beyond permissible selling hours in the open market, usually after 9:00 am. Their customers are those around densely populated, low-to middle-income residences.Produce from peri-urban farms finds its way to the vendors in Commonwealth market, Quezon City, with 10% of their supply reportedly coming from farmers around La Mesa Dam and Bulacan (Table 10). Farmers directly deliver their produce in the night market. Vendors in Pasay also experienced selling urban produce during the pandemic through the KADIWA (DA-LGU food distribution initiative) stores, where they can get vegetables at low prices. They welcome improvements along this chain as this means fresher and better quality produce, less logistics cost, and easily manageable information on supply volume and prices. The urban agriculture initiative, which, at the moment, is mostly geared toward self-sufficiency, holds promise as a commercial venture, with more inputs from further assessment of agrifood systems.As to risk and efficiency issues in the supply-market chain, both producersuppliers and vendors are faced with high costs and prices caused by a variety of factors, though at different levels: high cost of inputs and resource use (labor), logistics, especially with supply being largely affected by weather/climate LGUs and private market operators can be encouraged to partner for initiative in market development planning to address needed improvement from physical infrastructure to waste management; facilitated by the CGIAR-CIP WP2 project .Capacity of informal vendors can be enhanced through awareness activties and implementation of good vendor practices (GVP) through the CGIAR-CIP WP2 project -the Vendor Business School . Business support services for the identified needs can be clarified, arranged, and facilitated for access .LGUs, traders' organizations, DA, baarangaysLGUs, private market operators, DTI, DA/ KADIWALGUs, private market operators, DA/ KADIWA, DTI, TESDALGUs, private market operators, DOH, TESDA, barangays DOH, NGOs, consumers' groups disturbances, in addition to low yields in some areas. Vegetables are easily affected as they are perishable and tend to have increased wastage during extreme weather events both at the production and distribution nodes of the chain.Traders usually hedge to avoid such losses and costs and fix selling at relatively higher prices, while buying from farmers at relatively low farm gate prices. The informal vendors who are at the receiving end of the third or fourth tier of the distribution chain already bear the bigger brunt of increased prices. Not surprisingly, buyers complain of high prices and cut down on purchases−the common woes of vendors (Table 11).The stakeholders (e.g., LGUs, DA, DTI, private sector, TESDA, DOH, NGOs) across the vegetable supply chain include a mix of public and private agencies that perform various roles and functions that can be tapped to address the identified challenges and opportunities from production to consumption (Table 11).Hoping for support from city governments and private market authorities, vendors expressed a desire for better selling environments, improved sanitation with adequate water provision for cleaning and washing, proper garbage/waste system, and adequate personal hygiene facilities. Despite the challenges, vendors remain positive and are willing to participate in collective ways of improving their trade but with consideration of the time and labor involved (Table 9).The Pasay informal vegetable vendors differ from the Quezon City vendors particularly in terms of location. The Pasay informal vendors are located very close to the small formal vegetable section because the talipapa (Primero Mayo in barangays 91 and 92) is situated in the block next to the city public market. They are very visible, with full access from the main highway and side streets.To compete well, informal vendors get their vegetables from the same sources that formal vendors use. All of the sample respondents buy vegetables from the wholesale bagsakan in Divisoria and from the Wowee night market, just a few hundred meters away, depending on type and price (Table 12).The Quezon City markets are in more secluded locations, but they are also nearer urban peri-urban vegetable growers who are an additional source of produce. Vendors here mostly source their products from wholesalers and traderretailers in the nearer Balintawak bagsakan market (64-71% The vendors in Pasay market reported a net income ranging from PhP 500 to PhP 5500 per day (US$7.5 -81). In Quezon City, the Commonwealth market vendors reported between PhP 1200 and PhP2000 day (US$18 -29.5); in Kamuning market, the range was PhP 500-1000/ day (US$7.5 -15). This reflects the mix of vegetables that are sold daily, which reportedly contribute to a greater share of sales and income; that is, the pattern of purchases in the surveyed markets. Pasay city vendors sell more of the tomatoes, onions, and garlic as well as forrestaurant-use vegetables such as potato, carrots, and pechay. These are common purchases of food establishments and households around the surveyed markets in the Libertad area, a densely populated district where low-to middle-income families reside. Commonwealth vendors profit more from vegetables mostly used in households and food establishments like pechay, eggplants, tomatoes, onions, garlic, and the greens saluyot, kangkong, and kinchay. Kamuning vendors follow the same pattern as do those in Pasay city, but sellers suffer from their location, as well as from competition with other markets (i.e., secondary and talipapa) that are accessible to surrounding residential districts.Table 13 reveals interesting findings on pricing as affected largely by supply sources. Buying and selling prices are the average of the reported prices during the peak season of the vegetable (meaning a relatively lower price on the average). However, with the limited sample size, this observation needs more in-depth study because of implications related to supply-price dynamics and seasonality as to vegetable type and sources.Yellow-shaded cells are comparably the lowest prices of commodity across the surveyed markets. Commonwealth vendors have the lowest buying and selling prices for tomato, potato, cabbage, and carrots, which are supplied directly by trader-wholesalers from the north (e.g., Pangasinan, Nueva Vizcaya) during the night market and for okra and ampalaya supplied by peri-urban growers from La Mesa Dam and Bulacan. Kamuning vendors offer the lowest prices for garlic, ginger, pechay (Baguio and native), and chayote, which are sourced from traderwholesalers in the Balintawak bagsakan market. These show a relatively more efficient vegetable selling in Quezon City markets where the vendors' selling prices are still lower compared with those of Pasay vendors even with price margins of about 50% versus 25-30% in Pasay City. Pasay vendors offer relatively higher prices even with lower margins for garlic, ginger, and pechay; but the best price is for onions with reasonably good margin at 50%. They have a competitive edge on onions, thereby contributing highly to their income. This high price at source Table 13. Average prices (PhP/kg) and margins (%) of common vegetables contributing to bigger share of sales and income.could still be covered by demand, with this vendor group located close to a densely populated area. Commonwealth vendors sell the greens at relatively low prices, which are reportedly supplied directly by peri-urban growers.The challenges in the supply-market chain of vegetable vendors revolve mainly on production instability (especially with the long chains from the north) brought about by extreme weather events and increasing input costs and logistics, which consequently result in fluctuations in supply and prices. While the long chain market links are established, informal vegetable vendors strive to gain access to smaller secondary night markets like Commonwealth in Quezon City and Wowee in Pasay City, where trader-consolidators from the north and CALABARZON deliver vegetables wholesale, which means cheaper prices and lower logistics. However, facilities in these start-up bagsakan markets are largely inadequate: very limited spaces, negligible storage, minimal utilities. They could not handle an expanded trade volume.On the whole, most markets suffer from similar problems, in various degreesof poor hygiene and sanitation, lack of water, inadequate garbage disposal, improper waste management, and no real-time market information. Vendors consider these as their own problems too, in addition to high costs and prices, perishability of goods, problematic customers, competition from new entrants and on-line selling, and the need for capital.Still, informal vegetable vendors are numerous and serve as critical links in the food system. Their contribution to the economy is significant, especially among the lesser endowed urban populace.There are opportunities for intervention to improve their capacities and operations to enable them to be more efficient links and to effectively contribute to the city's resilience. The positive attitude of most vendors and their willingness to participate in development efforts, the progressive and compassionate attitude of city authorities toward the informal sector, and the existence of various urban initiatives for food security and sustainable development with some institutional innovations are strong foundations on which to build a strong and resilient city.Savor the streets filled with smoke and aroma from charcoal grills and fryers; mini-stalls with folding eating counters with casseroles of pares or goto; melting pots of consumers waiting for affordable, convenient, and delicious street food.The iconic Filipino street food in creative names of simply delicious flavors do liven public and private spaces across the streets of Metro Manila and all over the country. A number of street food are animal-based (e.g., chicken and pork meat, chicken parts, eggs); some are native delicacies (e.g., banana/camote cue, ginataan), and others are ready-to-cook industrial processed foods (e.g., squid and fish balls, tempura). Street food is also a way of understanding the native food culture and tourists enjoy partaking such treats. They have become popular in night markets till the wee hours of the morning.Street food has become a distinctive food category on its own as evidenced by their popularity in urban areas and the rest of the whole country (Neary 2018, Imatheu 2017, Recio andGomez 2013, Milgram 2011).Pork and chicken are the major meat products consumed by about 62-63% of households. Chicken egg is greatly preferred by 82%, but only 2% consume fresh/pasteurized milk (PSA 2017). This consumption pattern and the large visibility of street food in urban spaces lead us to focus on such food from fresh animal-based processed products (e.g., pork and chicken barbecue, kwek-kwek/ tokneneng from quail or chicken eggs).Street food can provide nutritious, lowcost, tasty food, according to some consumers. But street food vendors have not been well-supported, and most lack facilities and proper education (e.g., food storage, adequate water and sanitation, waste collection) to enable them to operate in safe and clean surroundings and to give hygienic services. They provide food not only to low-wage workers and urban poor households, but also, increasingly, to professionals, students, and consumers at higher socioeconomic status.There is a huge culture of grilling in Philippine street food and there are very few things Filipinos do not enjoy grilled over charcoal. Usually, pork, chicken, and chicken parts (feet, head, intestines, neck) are marinated, skewered, grilled over charcoal, and basted with a barbecue sauce, then served with seasoned vinegar. Also, fried food is just as popular served with sweet sour or spicy sauce or seasoned vinegar.Street food in Pasay and Quezon City comprise a diverse selection of animal-and vegetable-based products. Animal products are both processed by the seller as well as sourced from third-party home processors and sold as meals or snacks. There are also native delicacies for snacks and fried products from ready-to-cook industrial processing. (Photo documentation of common street food is presented in Annex 3.) Table 14 summarizes the different street food sold by respondent vendors in the three market areas in Pasay and in Commonwealth and Kamuning markets in Quezon City.Animal-based street food. The animalbased street food mainly consist of different kinds of meat (pork, chicken, beef ), animal parts (liver, feet, innards, head), and eggs. The most popular meat preparation is barbecue, where the meat and animal parts are usually prepared in different cuts, marinated in soy sauce with vinegar and spices for a few hours at home, and skewered; they are then brought to the selling location for grilling over charcoal upon purchase. Cooked barbecue is served with sauce or vinegar dip. Increasingly popular is serving a filling, tasty meat dish (e.g., beef pares) as combo meal (with rice or noodles) at affordable price.The egg-based street food have gained nationwide popularity like the boiled fertilized egg (balut or penoy), and the fried boiled chicken (tokneneng) and quail (kwek-kwek) eggs coated with flour-egg mix. Energy boosters like lugaw/arroz caldo (rice porridge with chicken, siomai, chicharon) or goto and mami noodles are main meals by themselves. Homemade processed traditional meat products such as longganisa, tocino, and embutido are fried and goes well with rice as meal.Industrial processed food. These are processed meat formulated by food manufacturers that are frozen or vacuumpacked and purchased from supermarkets or grocery retail stores. These include the fish and squid balls, siomai, kikiam, and tempura; hotdog and cold cuts, and burgers. These are commonly fried or grilled and eaten as snacks or part of a meal.Native delicacies. For years, native delicacies have always been important snack food for all ages. Commonly mentioned by respondents are the popular banana and camote cue and turon (fried wrapped banana); flour or rootcropbased formulations like cuchinta, palitaw, and carioca; and home-made ice cream, shake, or palamig (juice coolers).The street food vendors interviewed for this assessment are currently residents of Pasay and Quezon City, with just under half having migrated during the 1980-1990 period from the Cordillera region (Abra), Bicol (Camarines Norte), and East Visayas (Leyte). They have a history of family members being engaged in food or street food businesses. Originally, they belonged to tenant farming families, but the low productivity of unsecured farms pushed them to migrate to Metro Manila. Some are lucky enough to have the business and location handed down from a street food vendor employer or from direct relatives. On the average, the street food vendors have been in business for 15-20 years, a significant length of time that implies that the business is good enough to financially support and sustain them. A balance of women and men are engaged in street food selling. Most of the snacks and native delicacies are handled by women, whereas meatbased street food are mostly handled by men, especially pares, balut/penoy, and kwek-kwek. Eight out of 10 vendors reported that street food vending is their main source of income; the rest have other income sources like driving, contribution from family members, and other microbusiness enterprises (Table 15). Two have multiple street food stands.Customers consist of walk-in buyers (for both individual and household food), market goers, loyal or suki workers (construction workers, drivers, students, market staff ) and employees of shops and offices nearby (Table 16). The continued construction activities during the There is sustained demand for all types of street food, especially kwek-kwek (quail's eggs), grilled or fried cold hotdogs, cuts and ready-to-fry industrial foods like fish/squid balls and tempura, native delicacies, home-prepared ice cream, and cold beverages. Consumers prefer ingredients to be fresh and they like natural ingredients such as ube (yam) ice cream from fresh tuber, not using powder or food color. Vendors are actually very positive with lockdown restrictions being lifted during the pandemic, and business is up again.Vendors who are located within the main market premises get permits from the market inspector, do not pay rent, but are not given permanent stalls. They are allowed to sell only at certain times: 8:00 am to 1:00 pm usually for meal servings (e.g., fried chicken) or 4:00-8:00 pm (e.g., barbecues, fried eatables), or during daytime for snack food and beverages. Those who locate in the talipapa, street corners, or sidewalks get permission from the barangay, subject to the barangay's directives, like clean-fixing their paraphernalia and doing proper garbage disposal. There may be unofficial concessions to secure a location; no payments but some tokens of gratitude like sharing some of the food sold (e.g., a few sticks of barbecue). Utang na loob (\"debt of gratitude\") is a strong Filipino value, which finds its way in business, especially for favors that redound to security of location.Restrictions during the pandemic, as well as the public consciousness about viral spread through food took a toll on the street food vendors. Opening a business, even with the permit to operate, was still slow. Only this year, with vaccinations in full swing, did business start to pick up. However, some reported good business, especially those who cater to construction workers, are in open markets, and located in corners of dense residential areas. Some even increased sales as many households chose to buy already prepared food to limit their market trips. Government cash assistance during the pandemic was mainly for food sustenance, but some were able to allocate part of this for capital. In Quezon City, two vendors were able to access livelihood capital support. Vendors needed capital assistance to improve their facilities (e.g., stalls, bench, stove, utensils, packaging) and maintain a working fund. With spirits up, they maintained a positive attitude, deciding to continue with street food vending and expressing willingness to participate in training or development initiatives, but with careful consideration of time so as not to disrupt business. 17). The array of needed business development support can be negotiated and facilitated with these agencies that are also in the process of finding ways to better collaborate and implement their respective mandates.Vendors' incomes depend on the kind and volume of goods sold, which depend on capitalization and markets. Meat-based barbecues (pork, chicken and parts), fried products (hotdogs, longganisa, tocino, chicken, eatables), and meal preparations (simple combo like pares) earn the most. On average, the range of net income of meat-based food products per day is PhP 1000-4000 (US$18.20-72.70); fried eatables (fish/squid balls, kikiam), PhP 1000-1500 (US$9.10-27.30); and native delicacies and drinks, PhP 500-1000 (US$9.10-18.20). Those with relatively less daily earnings find other supplemental income sources.Street food is patronized and preferred by many because it is more accessible and cheaper than food offered even in small restaurants, logically due to its very low Earlier literature and reports pointed out concerns of regulators about informal vending, such as the competition and loss of business it poses for formal (registered) retailers, congestion and disorder in the streets, potential for increased crime (especially in areas of dense informal trading), loss of tourism, and spread of diseases (Giroux et al. 2021, Roever andSkinner 2016 ). This explains the negative view of the informal sector, resulting in an ambiguous relationship between authorities and this sector. The enforcement of anti-vending laws further strained the relationship; cities could not consistently support and enforce food safety and public health regulations due to limited resources. The general approach maintained is that of regulation and control, and evidence shows that such repressive tactics are not effective (Giroux et al. 2021, Skinner et al. 2018, Evans 2017). The informal food sector: insights for ways forwardThe significant findings and emerging issues addressed in this rapid assessment study relate to the LGUs and the informal food markets. These are summarized in the following: The pilot cities maintain a compassionate stance toward the informal food sector, clearly recognizing its role in food provision, employment, livelihood and income generation. Steps have been taken for their formalization-facilitative registration, inclusion in the formation of market association or cooperative, tolerance for coexistence in business with formal stall owners, and planning for relocation to an improved market facility. But further details of effective operation need to be clearly laid out.There are also recent initiatives of integrating marketing in the urban food security and livelihood program as an extension or as improvements of local marketing initiatives with the DA-KADIWA food supply provision during the pandemic. The feasibility for realistic improvement of the sector depends on the specifics of each strategy.Location specificity could be critical with informal vending having diverse conditions to effectively operate. It is important to assess the spatial aspects of food distribution and access to help ensure the viability of vendors' location and help ensure food access by the poor households (Giroux et al. 2021).Vendor-specific types of intervention considering linkages with suppliers and consumers and critical conditions like hygiene and sanitation practices, food quality standards, and waste/garbage disposal are non-negotiable. Safety, hygienic selling environment, and security can be significantly enhanced by making available areas for informal trade, including shelter, areas for sorting and packing, and storage and ensuring good water supply for cleaning and sanitary practices. Personal care and childcare facilities are additional considerations as women are largely part of this sector.Locating informal food vendors with other informal commodity sellers in one single market facility or informal food vendors taken as a group and relocating them would likely leave many households less food secure. This does not consider the spatial aspects of food distribution and access and removes certain food chain nodes that low-income and less foodsecure households rely on.Also, relocating them in places away from the concentration of their markets will negatively affect the viability of their business. Understanding of how location affects food access and business relationships is needed by local governments and urban planners to plan the relocation of informal vendors to improve their physical market conditions (Skinner et al. 2018).The regularization of the informal food sector is already under way through a local ordinance that facilitates the registration of hawkers at the Quezon City Hall. While Pasay City is still thinking of ways to formally recognize and support the informal sector, it has started the process of benchmarking. Authorities may need to consider the constraints that this process may present to the informal vendors. The current procedure of the barangay giving permission to informal vendors to operate in talipapa or street corners may need to be assessed in terms of operability. A consultative process may be facilitated with the informal vendors for a win-win strategy. This may be difficult but could help improve efficiency in terms of the number and spatial location of the vendors and the greater likelihood of establishing an amenable food system (Giroux et al. 2021).The case of Singapore on formalizing the informal vendors in the 1960s provides useful insights. This is a benchmark caseInformal Food Markets in Quezon City and Pasay City, Philippines: A Rapid Assessmentwhen Singapore was still a developing city-state (Ghani 2011). By area, Singapore is about the same size as Manila; yet Metro Manila currently is a robust consumer market; the latter, three times more populated. Metro Manila has more global street food types comparable with Singapore than the traditional-food types of other Asian cities.About 40,000 hawkers selling food and other low-cost goods and services were active in the streets and along the Singapore River. Serious food safety and environmental issues then haunted authorities. A licensing and inspection scheme was introduced with a main strategy of relocating vendors to hawker centers: 54 centers built in the late 1970s and an additional 59 in the early 1980s. After which, in the next decade, a \"regulate and educate\" policy was phased in to improve hygiene practices. The centers were increasingly recognized in their role as important community elements for social interaction. In 2001, a huge investment was done (US$420 M) for the hawker centers' upgrading: largely infrastructure improvements complete with needed facilities and equipment (e.g., freezers, cleaning areas); and improvements were continuous to accommodate additional hawkers (2014: additional 6,000 vendors). They continue to be favorite places and have loyal customers, an attraction to tourists (Tefft et al. 2017). Note that Singapore is a city-state as big as Metro Manila, but only about 20% as populous. Thus, more urban poor benefit from food provisioning and livelihood. Further, tourists can serve as additional markets for more viable informal enterprises.A case where a city with similarities to Metro Manila successfully dealt with regularization of the food system in a participatory way through stakeholder engagement is Bangkok (Boosabong 2019).The pilot cities have included improvements in market physical infrastructure and facilities (including waste management) in their market development programs. Pasay is challenged due to its already congested public market space, whereas Quezon City still has a bigger land area. In both, however, proximity to residential areas via affordable transport routes can be an issue. Installing store kiosks in strategic accessible public spaces like parks, public markets and offices, or terminals can be more feasible for the informal vendors like the Quezon City pilot project, (i.e., selling in kiosks made of tents near the city hall and park).The facilities and utilities of street food vendors can benefit from improved access to financing their food stands/stalls, with technical assistance on design. A few vendors reported getting minimal financial support. But this needs to be done in a more systematic basis. Marketing and promotions assistance will need to be more rationalized and linked to seasonal supply or production patterns of vegetables and consumer perspective of street food.To increase the effectiveness of their contribution to resilient cities, the assessment has indicated that the informal food vendors can benefit from strengthening of their enterprise skills, consciousness and practice of food safety, hygiene and sanitation, nutrient knowledge of raw and processed foods, waste recycling and use, regulatory policies and a broad understanding of the agrifood systems. On the whole, capacity strengthening improves livelihoods of vendors and contributes to the efficiency of the food marketing-consumption system, especially serving the low-income urban population. Building partnerships with the city governments and other relevant stakeholders to implement this capacity strengthening is key.The informal food vendors (both vegetables and street food) identified very similar key capacity strengthening and learning needs in order to improve their business capability. These needs include: For capacity development of informal food vendors in pilot cities, the CIPdeveloped manual and learning guide, \"Farmer Business School with Gender and Climate Change Perspective\" (FBS-GCC), will be revised to fit the learning needs of informal vendors. Developed as the Vendor Business School (VBS), it will have a similar agrifood system perspective with gender and climate change. Critically relevant issues (food safety, hygiene and sanitation, food and nutrition, etc.) surrounding the vendors' contribution to Resilient Cities Initiative will be integrated.The information gathered from interviews with vendors and officials and direct observations are the inputs to the revision of the FBS-GCC manual and learning guide.The FBS-GCC is a community-based business cycle-long participatory learning that builds enterprise skills among farmers as they interact with market chain actors.The curriculum adopts a value chain framework that could have a perspective similar to that of agrifood systems. The FBS-GCC has been adopted in the IFADfunded project with the DA-Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources into the Aqua-based Business School with Gender and Climate Change (ABS-GCC) perspective and as Value Chain Business School (VBS) in India CIP-World Bank APART potato project.Engaging vendors under a supportive environment can be done by encouraging them to join business associations where they can have a voice. Specifics can follow from a consultative process where vendors can effectively communicate their needs, constraints and aspirations, and negotiate for solutions. Business organizations are venues where vendors can continuously improve, learn, and innovate with and from other members or mentors. They can negotiate more strongly as a group to pursue plans or push for some solutions and can better leverage for technical or financial assistance or other support services (FAO 2007). In the Philippines, organizations can better access assistance or are preferred beneficiaries for support services.Partnership for transformative change is essential. Local authorities should consider that, formally, vendors lack an institutional partner with whom they can negotiate for their rights and responsibilities, and they may not understand regulations. No agency has the monopoly of knowledge, expertise, and operational adequacy to plan and implement a complex urban development for resilience program across time and spatial dimensions. Giroux et al. (2021) note spatial differences and vendors' and consumers' needs in cities; thus, a one-size-fits-all approach for integration of informal vendors into the food system is less likely to be successful in terms of economic development, household food security, and urban resilience.LGU partnership with government and non-government agencies, private sector, and civil society is gaining ground.Involving informal vendors in a relevant consultative process will give them a voice and participation in understanding their challenges and finding feasible solutions. They lack institutional partners with whom they can negotiate for their needs as well as make them understand regulations and responsibilities. Participatory consultation with vendors (e.g., issues of relocation and registration of businesses) can be facilitated. It may be difficult but it could be done with determination.The ever-growing body of literature toward understanding component systems aimed at resilient cities is rich and multi-faceted, engaging various disciplines, levels, and tools of analyses, perspectives, and approaches. The boundaries can be so seamless that the suggested integrative approach, at times, seems difficult to manage. A clear broad framework, some guides and toolkits for analyses should be useful and forthcoming from various international organizations (FAO 2020, Skinner et al. 2018, WB and FAO 2017, ADB 2014). Focusing on a subsystem can be a pragmatic strategy to deal with the complexity without losing the whole conceptual framework to put in context the interconnectedness.The current perspective of the urban agrifood system focuses on improving the efficiency of the informal food markets and harnessing its huge potential to enhance food and nutrition security, in other words, food resilience. Thus, the nature of analysis and trend of discussion center on an assessment of the informal food markets, both the spaces themselves and also the key actors in those markets, informal vegetable vendors, street food vendors, and those responsible for the management of the markets. Some conclusions may be made about the informal food markets:• Local governments need to accept the current reality that almost half of all employment is informal in urban Asia (ILO 2018) and a large part of that urban employment is related to wholesale and retail food vending (FAO 2007). The markets where food vendors operate are very important economic and social spaces, which often have infrastructure and organizational problems that market managers are trying to address, but with major challenges where they need support. • Informal food markets, like the vegetable and street food markets, are increasingly significant parts of the urban agrifood system characterized by a) diversity in supply-market chains (e.g., long and short chains) in terms of structure, conditions, and relationships that are specific to the respective location and commodity; and b) lack of visibility and voice in policy formulation and implementation and social development programs. • Informal food vendors are key links between multiple food production locations and consumers in all types of markets (i.e., primary, secondary, satellite), and food vending is a source of livelihood and income for many actors across the food system, especially benefiting the urban poor. • Informal food vendors need to be viewed as assets of the urban food system and included in urban dialogue, planning, and policymaking. This will require authorities to proactively consult with vendors and search for holistic approaches in understanding the sector and crafting strategies for their improved operations and contribution to the local economy. • Governance is key in helping the informal food sector effectively contribute to resilient urban food systems to enhance their roles in food provisioning and livelihood and income generation. Thus, the Resilient City project initiative advocates for proactive collaborative partnership with local governments, market managers, and other relevant stakeholders with a clear understanding of the nature and dynamics of the urban food system.Though the proposed intervention phase from this assessment by the Resilient Cities team will be focused on food vendor capacity strengthening, there are many other issues that have emerged that need to be addressed to strengthen food marketing and the food systems in the target cities. These include infrastructure improvement, organic waste management, better understanding of food flows and market chain dynamics, food policy analysis, and formulation and implementation of integrated urban agrifood system development. These may be taken up in future collaborative actions between city governments and Resilient Cities.","tokenCount":"12049"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0872439134.json b/data/part_2/0872439134.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4903900438b273abeb05957eb7519b0cb5cefb5f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0872439134.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"1d764b7a29ff169be1bea688f48b1219","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/f89f7bf7-59c9-4522-803b-bf483fc74eec/content","id":"-1337181094"},"keywords":["vector","vector-borne disease","biocontrol","endosymbionts","sustainability"],"sieverID":"ad1a5072-97a1-4615-b9b1-c124c96370da","pagecount":"9","content":"Vector-borne diseases pose a severe threat to human and animal health. Culex pipiens L. (Diptera: Culicidae) is a widespread mosquito species and serves as a vector for the transmission of infectious diseases such as West Nile disease and Lymphatic Filariasis. Synthetic insecticides have been the prime control method for many years to suppress Cx. pipiens populations. However, recently, the use of insecticides has begun to be questioned due to the detrimental impact on human health and the natural environment. Therefore, many authorities urge the development of eco-friendly control methods that are nontoxic to humans. The bacterial associates [Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus spp. (Enterobacterales: Morganellaceae)] of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) (Sterinernema spp. and Heterorhabditis spp.) (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae and Steinernematidae) are one of the green approaches to combat a variety of insect pests. In the present study, the mosquitocidal activity of the cell-free supernatants and cell suspension (4 × 10 7 cells mL −1 ) of four different symbiotic bacteria (Xenorhabdus nematophila, X. bovienii, X. budapestensis, and P. luminescens subsp. kayaii) was assessed against different development stages of Cx. pipiens (The 1st/2nd and 3rd/4th instar larvae and pupa) under laboratory conditions. The bacterial symbionts were able to kill all the development stages with varying levels of mortality. The 1st/2nd instar larvae exhibited the highest susceptibility to the cell-free supernatants and cell suspensions of symbiotic bacteria and the efficacy of the cellfree supernatants and cell suspensions gradually declined with increasing phases of growth. The highest effectiveness was achieved by the X. bovienii KCS-4S strain inducing 95% mortality to the 1st/2nd instar larvae. The results indicate that tested bacterial symbionts have great potential as an eco-friendly alternative to insecticides.Among blood-sucking insects, mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) are the most wellknown class of vectors of pathogens causing serious diseases in humans and animals [1,2]. To date, 26 mosquito species have been identified as disease vectors, 8 of which belong to the Culex genus [2][3][4]. Culex pipiens L. (Diptera: Culicidae) is one of the most abundant Culex spp. in Europe and a major vector of several diseases with medical and veterinary importance [3][4][5][6]. Culex pipiens has been linked to the transmission of the major cause of lymphatic filariasis, Wuchereria bancrofti, and viral diseases including Rift Valley fever, St. Louis encephalitis, and the Sindbis and West Nile viruses [2,[5][6][7][8]. Additionally, as a possible vector, Cx. pipiens has also been associated with the Hepatitis C virus (HCV) [9][10][11].Controlling vector mosquitoes plays a vital role in preventing vector-borne diseases and ensuring public health locally or nationwide as well as reducing nuisance mosquito populations. Of various mosquito control methods, synthetic insecticides such as organochlorine and organophosphate compounds are the most preferred control strategy [12]. However, over the last decade, the use of synthetic insecticides has begun to be questioned by many authorities due to continuous use or inappropriate application that exerts strong insecticide resistance selection pressure on mosquito populations and causes harmful effects on human health and the environment [13][14][15][16][17]. As a result, in recent years, developing environmentally safe and effective mosquito control strategies has gained importance and this has prompted many researchers to investigate various alternative methods in the control of vector mosquitoes [18][19][20].Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) (Steinernema spp. and Heterorhabditis spp.) and their bacterial symbionts [Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus spp. (Enterobacterales: Morganellaceae)] are lethal parasites of insect pests and an emerging approach to controlling many economically impactful pests [21][22][23][24]. The bacterial associates of EPNs, after being vectored into a host body by infective juveniles (IJs) of EPNs, multiply using the host hemolymph as a source of nutrition and release a wide range of metabolites including toxin complexes (Tc) and immunosuppressants into the host hemolymph that is lethal to host insects [25][26][27]. Recent studies have shown that bacterial symbionts alone are capable of inducing varying levels of mortality against target insects without their nematode partners [28][29][30][31]. However, only a few studies have tested the pathogenic activity of bacterial symbionts of EPNs against Cx. pipiens [29]. In addition, the differences in the mortality of test insects have been generally attributed to the variation in the frequency and chemical compositions of secondary metabolites with insecticidal and immunosuppressant activities produced by different symbiotic bacteria species/strains [32][33][34][35][36]. Therefore, the screening of pathogenicity of various Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus species/strains on the target host are of crucial importance for ensuring effective biocontrol. In this study, the mosquitocidal efficacy of cell-free supernatants and cell suspensions of different symbiotic bacteria (X. nematophilai, X. bovienii, X. budapestensis, and P. luminescens subsp. kayaii) was evaluated against the different development stages of Cx. pipiens.Different larval instars and pupae of Cx. pipiens were obtained from the stock culture of the Parasitology Department of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Erciyes University, Türkiye [6]. The larvae and pupae were observed for one day after being transported to the Laboratory of Entomology (Erciyes University) and kept in an incubator at 25 • C, 60% RH, and a photoperiod of 14:10 h (Light:Darkness).Four bacterial strains of EPNs [Xenorhabdus bovienii (MZ688381), Xenorhabdus budapestensis (MW403817), Xenorhabdus nematophila (MZ688376), and Photorhabdus luminescens subsp. kayaii (MW403818)] isolated and identified in earlier studies were tested for their mosquitocidal activity in the bioassays [35].In order to extract the bacterial symbionts of EPNs, ten Galleria mellonella (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae were exposed to IJs of nematode partners of each symbiotic bacterium at 200 IJs/mL distilled water. Dead larvae were transferred to sterile Petri dishes and placed on modified White's traps for the emergence of IJs. Approximately 500 newly harvested IJs kept in sodium hypochlorite (10% w/v) (NaOCl) solution for disinfection were crushed manually using a sterile tissue grinder in a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge containing 1 mL of sterile PBS buffer. Subsequently, 20 µL of the suspension was inoculated on nutrient bromothymol blue triphenyl tetrazolium chloride agar (NBTA medium) [25,26,28] and maintained at 28 • C (20% RH, in darkness) for 48 h. Pure bacterial colonies were obtained by re-streaking the single colonies of phase I variants onto the NBTA plates [37,38]. The bacterial cells of purified colonies were inoculated into the larvae of G. mellonella using a sterile needle for each injection to confirm the pathogenicity of the symbiotic bacteria. Then, bacterial symbionts were re-isolated from the hemolymph of dead larvae and grown on the NBTA medium at 28 • C for 48 h [36][37][38].A single bacterial colony of each pure culture was transferred into 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 mL Luria-Bertani broth (LB) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) with a sterile loop and incubated for 6 days at 28 ± 1 • C in a shaking incubator at 150 rpm [36][37][38]. Then, sub-cultured bacteria suspensions were transferred into 50 mL sterile Falcon tubes. The supernatant and pellets were carefully separated from the suspension by centrifugation twice at 20,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 • C. The final supernatant fractions were clarified by passing through a 0.22 µm millipore filter [39,40]. The presence of bacterial cells in the filtrated suspensions was checked by streaking a drop of each suspension on the NBTA medium. The remaining bacterial cell pellets were purified by washing with sterile distilled water twice. The resulting bacterial pellets were re-suspended in 5 mL of sterile distilled water. The total number of cells was calculated by using a spectrophotometer (OD600, 600 nm) and adjusted to a final concentration of 4 × 10 7 cells/mL by diluting with sterile distilled water [37]. The cell-free supernatants and cell suspensions were stored for one week at 14 • C prior to their use in the experiment.Different developmental stages of mosquitoes generally occur in mixed groups in outdoor circumstances. Therefore, the susceptibility of mixed instars (1st/2nd and 3rd/4th) and pupae was tested against the cell-free supernatants and cell suspensions of four different bacterial symbionts of EPNs under controlled conditions. The experiments were performed in 24-well plates containing 1.5 mL of distilled water. One single larva of either the 1st/2nd or 3rd/4th instars was simultaneously put into each well using a plastic Pasteur pipette to avoid cannibalism [27]. As much finely ground commercial fish food as would fit on the tip of a toothpick was added to each well plate as a source of nutrition. Then, 0.5 mL of cell-free supernatant or cell suspension was pipetted into each well. Ten larvae were used for each treatment and each treatment consisted of four replicates. In the control treatments, the well plates were treated with the Luria-Bertani broth only and the same experimental procedures were followed. The well plates were maintained at 25 • C, 60% RH, and a photoperiod of 14:10 h (Light:Darkness) and checked for larval and pupal mortality daily for three days by gently poking larvae with a sterile pipette. The larvae and pupae were considered dead when no mobility was observed after several poking. To confirm bacterial infection, the hemolymph of the dead larvae and pupae was inoculated onto NBTA plates and incubated at 28 • C for 48 h. The experiment was carried out twice on different dates and mortality data from the two experiments were pooled for statistical analysis.The arcsine-transformed data were subjected to factorial repeated measures ANOVA (RM-ANOVA) using IBM SPSS statistics (Version 29) (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Tukey's multiple range tests (p ≤ 0.05) were performed to make multiple comparisons. Lethal times (The exposure time of different development stages of Cx. pipiens to cell-free supernatants and cell suspensions at which the mortality reached 50% of each tested population) (LT 50 ) were calculated with probit analysis with 95% confidence for each treatment.The results showed that the mortality of Cx. pipiens was significantly affected by all main factors (Table S1). The 1st/2nd instar larvae were the most susceptible developmental stage to the tested cell-free supernatants, followed by the 3rd/4th instar larvae and pupae. The highest efficacies were achieved as the exposure time to the supernatants increased. Among the tested cell-free supernatants of symbiotic bacteria, the highest effectiveness was obtained by X. bovienii KCS-4S inducing 65, 80, and 95% mortality on the 1st/2nd instar larvae 24, 48, and 72 h after treatment, respectively. The sensitivity with the 3rd/4th instar larvae ranged between 22.5% and 62.5%. Xenorhabdus bovienii KCS-4S was the only strain that exhibited mortality greater than 50% on pupae (Table 1). Different lowercase letters show statistically significant differences among the cell-free supernatants of symbiotic bacteria (Tukey, p ≤ 0.05).The cell suspensions of the tested symbiotic bacteria were lethal to the different development stages of Cx. pipiens with varying levels of virulence and all variables [Symbiotic bacteria (S), Development Stage (D), and exposure time] including the interaction between S×D and S×t influenced the mortality rates of Cx. pipiens (Table S2).However, although the mortality rates showed an increasing trend with rising exposure times, the cell suspension treatments had relatively low mortalities in the different development stages of Cx. pipiens compared to cell-free supernatants. Xenorhabdus nematophila E-76 was the most efficient strain causing 57.5% mortality in the 1st/2nd instar larvae, followed by X. bovienii KCS-4S (50.0%). However, the cell suspensions demonstrated a gradual decline in toxicity in the 3rd/4th instar larvae and pupae (Table 2). In general, the lowest LT 50 values were obtained in the 1st/2nd instar larvae and the LT 50 values increased with the 3rd/4th instar larvae and pupae. The LT 50 values ranged between 21.2 and 77.1 in the cell-free supernatant treatments while higher LT 50 values were obtained in the cell-suspension treatments, varying between 53.4 and 74.6 h. The supernatant of X. bovienii KCS-4S strain was the most toxic among the supernatants of the tested bacteria and provided the lowest LT 50 values in the different development stages of Cx. pipiens. However, in the cell suspension treatments, X. nematophila E-76 yielded the lowest LT 50 values (Table 3). The bacterial symbionts of EPNs have attracted great attention in the last decade due to their biocontrol potential against a wide range of agricultural pests including insect vectors [27,[41][42][43][44][45]. However, although efficient, most of these studies targeted a single development stage of the target pests [27][28][29][30]32,43]. In the present study, the toxicity of different bacterial symbionts of EPNs was evaluated against different development stages of Cx. pipiens. The results revealed that 1st/2nd instar larvae were highly susceptible to the cell-free supernatants of tested bacterial symbionts while 3rd/4th instar larvae and pupae showed a moderate sensitivity. These results are in line with Da Silva et al. [27], who reported 52% and 73% mortality in the 3rd/4th instar larvae of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) (Diptera: Culicidae) after treatment with X. nematophila and P. luminescens, respectively. In contrast, 98% larval mortality was reported in another study against the 3rd instar of A. aegypti larvae when treated with a 2 mL bacterial suspension of Xenorhabdus ehlersii (bMH9.2_TH) containing 10 8 CFU/mL [28]. The discrepancy in mortality rates may be due to the differences in the amount and composition of secondary metabolites (toxins, enzymes, and proteins) produced by different species/strains of bacterial associates of EPNs, metabolites that exhibit varying levels of insecticidal and immunosuppressant activities [25,[46][47][48][49]. For instance, Hasan et al. [33] reported a great variation in the secondary metabolite production of different strains of X. nematophila and a positive correlation between secondary metabolite production and mortality in Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera) larvae. In another study, Fukuruksa et al. [28] tested the insecticidal activities of different Xenorhabdus stockiae strains on A. aegypti larvae, and the mortality rates ranged between 2% and 64%. Sheetal et al. [41] reported that purified lecithinase enzyme produced by Xenorhabdus sp. was found to be highly toxic to the 3rd instar larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus (Say) (Diptera: Culicidae). Similarly, Vani and Lalithambika [47] isolated an insecticidal protein that caused 93% mortality on the 3rd instar larvae of Anopheles gambiae Giles (Diptera: Culicidae). Although no toxic compounds were characterized in this study, the results indicate that the cell-free supernatants of tested bacteria contain highly toxic substances that can be used against Cx. pipiens.This study also revealed that early instars of Cx. pipiens larvae exhibited a higher susceptibility to both cell-free supernatants and cell suspension solutions, which is consistent with the findings of Ünal et al. [48] and Fathy et al. [49] who reported a higher efficacy of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus bacteria on the early instars of Agrotis ipsilon (Hufnagel) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Schistocerca gregaria (Forsskål) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) larvae/nymph, respectively. One possible reason for this may be the differences in the immune responses of insects in different life stages. The insects counteract entomopathogens with different cellular and humoral responses. However, a number of studies demonstrated that insect immunological reactions can vary depending on the development stage of the insects [50][51][52][53]. For instance, Abdolmaleki et al. [54] indicated that late instars of Pieris brassicae (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera, Pieridae) larvae, when challenged with the culture broth of Photorhabdus temperate subsp. temperata exhibited much higher phenoloxidase activity compared to early instars. This may also have played a role in the poor efficacy of cell suspension treatments against the larvae due to the activation of the innate immune system upon the detection of bacterial cells.In conclusion, cell-free supernatant treatments provided higher mortality against different development stages of Cx. pipiens than cell suspension treatments. The highest efficacy among the tested development stages (the 1st/2nd instar and 3rd/4th instar larvae and pupae) was obtained by X. bovienii KCS-4S in cell-free supernatant treatments against the 1st/2nd instar larvae. Although the pupa of Cx. pipiens was the least susceptible stage to the cell-free supernatants, 55% mortality was achieved by X. bovienii KCS-4S. The results indicate that the use of the tested Xenorhabdus and Photrhabdus bacteria could be a novel approach in the biocontrol of Cx. pipiens. However, further studies are needed to identify, isolate, and assess the biocontrol potential of bioactive compounds that display potent insecticidal activities.The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https: //www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens12091095/s1, Table S1: Summary of statistical analysis of the mortality data of different development stages of Culex pipiens L. (Diptera: Culicidae) after treatment with cell-free supernatants of different symbiotic bacteria; Table S2: Summary of statistical analysis of the mortality data of different development stages of Culex pipiens after treatment with cell suspensions of different symbiotic bacteria.","tokenCount":"2663"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0889390087.json b/data/part_2/0889390087.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7e36288d5a214611c000e52559f755ded4d70e38 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0889390087.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6f20b2ef6f96968fbd8d17de980d23f1","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/610a4369-11f1-4174-8618-92be46a38951/retrieve","id":"-277988454"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"afa82bec-9764-466a-b9af-f4d0fd3bf548","pagecount":"49","content":".. l. Why Raise Gender lssues ? I Gender issues 3 are not new to the Consultative Group on Intemational Agricultural Research (CGIAR) 5ystem. Indead, the importance of gender issues in agricultural research and women's roles in agricultural production and food systems have been discussed by members of the CGIAR System on several occasions during tha past decade. Explicit. recommendationa conceming gender ilsues have been made by the System itlalf to the member Intemational Agricultural Reaearch Centera (IARCs):To incorporate the gender variable in research methods and analysis, to include more women farmara in the IARC tachnology generation process.to increase tha numbers of women fram National Agricultural Resesrch snd Extensian 5ystems (NARES) in IARC training programs, snd to engage more women professionals in the ranks of IARC scientific staff, management snd boarda.While certain Centers have made exceptional progress in sdapting snd implementing many of these recommendations. adoption of the recommendations scross the CGIAR system ia quite uneven. Some sppear to haya ignored the recommandations altogether.What factora contribute to adoption of s gender perspective among those Center's that haya done so successfully? Why have the other IARCs found it difficult to deal with gender issues? What 'next steps\" should be taken by the CGIAR System to ensure system-wide attention to gender? 3A note on terminology:Sex refers to the physical and biological differences between men and women.These differences are congenital and celatively universal and unchanging. The term \"gender' refecs to a social rather than biological constructo lt describes the socially determined attributes of men and women. including male and female roles. As a social construct, gender coles are based on leamed behavior and are flexible and variable acrosa and within cultures. Gender is a useful socioeconomic variable to analyze roles, responsib!lit!es. constraints, opportunities and incentives of the people involved in research and development effarts.\"Gender blindnen\" is the inability to parceive different gender roles and J:esponsibilities, the perception that all farmer! are male (or neuter). and the failure to realize that research and project activities can have different effects on men and women.\"Gender !!).alysis• is the analys!s of the intersection of male and female roles and ._~ponsibilities with research or project goals. strategies, and outcomes, at anj stage of the project cycle. The focus of gender analysis ia less on equity tor women and more on the effectiveness and effic!ency of development activities. Effective gender analya!a, however, ultimstely leada to better definition of human resource needs and capabilities, results in more equitable allocation of resources and benefits and revision of the gender 1mbalance that exists among the professionals involved in research and development.1 , , , Guided by these questions. chis paper addresses five topics. Beginning with a brief overview of the rationale for ineluding gender issues in agrieultural researeh and development. the paper then summarizes the existing sets of recommendations made to the CG!AR 5ystem eoneeming gender issues, A synthesis of the discuasion and reeommendations made on differential user groups and gender issues at the 1981 Intemational Centers Week Seminar 1s ineluded. Mindful of che large number.of reeommendations already 'on the books,' the next seetion highlights the innovative strategies and approaehes taken by some Centera to de al with eertain gender iasues. This i8 followed with an analysis of the underlying reasona for the difficultie8 within the !ARC eommunity of incorporating gender sensitive researeh end development. Based on this analysi, and drawing upon the lucceasful experiences frem within the 5ystem, the final part of the paper moves the discussion beyond ehe existing recommendations to next steps and alternative strategies te assist the CG!AR System in aehieving a better gender balance in the methods and operation af its researeh pragram. This paper has been written in direct response to a request made by several of the CG!AR donor representatives at the last Intemational Cantera Weak (I<:\"J-1989), Duri~g the maeting. they raised the question of what progress had be en made by the !ARCs in dealing with gender issues sinee the saminar condaeted during the 1981 ICW that drew attention to differential usert and teehnology. lhey requested that the topic be placed on the agenda at thi, mid-term meeting of the CGlAR System. The overarching concem of these donora and other. i8 not directed juat at the CG!AR system. but rather representa a global coneem for monitoring the progresa af resaarch and develapmant organizations in incorporating appropriate gender perspectives.As this mid-term meeting of the CGlAR marks the beginning of the 1990s and the last decade of this eentury, it i. timaly to take stock of where we are in reaching gendar equity in the international 8ystmR for agricultural researeh.A lationale fer a Gender Perspectiva in Agricultural lesearen.In a recent IDiC technieal study. Patricia Stamp poses two key quastions regarding technology development and transfer that are very relevant to the work of the CGlAR System. 'irst. ahe asks whether the outcoma envisaged ia really developmant. \"Unle •• women ana --by intimata but not previously selfevident implication --ehildren are unequivoeally served. soeiety itself has not been served\" (Stamp 1989,2). She observe. that ovar the, past lS years there has been 'en emerging m~ 'al aud seientific commitlr•\"' .. ',0 the truth that woman are half of humanity &nd that gender relations are as fundamental a shaping farce in society as are economic relations or politieal structure. Indeed. there i3 no politieal econamy that ia gendar neutral, as those who are willing to look diseover. In development discourse, women are no longar entirely invisible, even if ehey still get far from equal time' (Ibid.)The second question posed by StamPlis whether Third World social reality has been adequately considerad in technology generation and transfer studies and projects. She argues, in barmony with a growing consensus of development practitioners, that 'it is no longer possible to view technology as artefact or to avoid tbe difficuIt task of examining our underlying assumptions about Tbird World societies' (Ibid.) She then calls upon all of us to test the scientific accuracy of each developmen; study by asking whether gender variables have been properly accounted foro To a large extent, what tbe CGlAR Donors are calling for i5 tbis 'gender test'. Gender anaIyais ia now recognized by many development institutions as an important aspect of the design, implementation and evaluation of development projects. The fact tbat women are critical to agricultural production and that their accaas to nacessary resources and effective technologies is often constrained by gender barriers is eonfirmed in the explosion of literature on ¡ender and development and the increasing number of eonferences and workshops on the topic in the international research and development community.However, there is considerable difference between voicing eoneern for ¡ender --that ls, being 'sensitized' --and ineorporating gender as an analytical variable in the research and development equation. The gap between sensitization and incorporation varies across the different development sectora. In agricultural research institutions. sensitization is, unfortunately, not widespread, and the gap between the few sensitized voiees and actual incorporation is deep. What might be called the general 'culture' of agricultural researeh institutions often serves to compound the 'normal' diffieuItiea of introducing gender analyais. Important among these cultural features and their implieations are: a general belief that teehnology alone will solve problems; a view of technology as 'neutral' to socioeconomic differences among users;increasing disciplinary and technical apecialization and relianee on reductionist researeh methods that encourage tachnleal fixes rather than integrated approaches; reIatively recent and scanty inclusion of non-economic social scianees in technology development and thus the absence of relevant gender sensitiva methodologies; a gene rally conservativa political climate institutionally that makes the lubject of _ O \" !r leem like a radical intrusion rather than a call for gre~ter efficiency of resource use; the language of agricultural researeh which has tended until only recently to make women invisible by referring to farmers and researchers only as 'he'; and, the extremely law numbers or absence of women among professional or management ranks of researchland extension institutions which contributes ta the male arientation oE the research agenda.!hese characteristics reElect deep-seated values that have made it difficult for agricultural research to effectively reach aut ta law-resource or amall farmers with relevant techuology, much less to even speak of a gender perspective in the development of the 'echuology.During the past 15 years, a growing client-orientation and a gradual shift towards on-farm experimentation has occurred as a result of several new interdisciplinary approaches ta agricultural tachuology development. Most important amang thele are Earming systems research and extension (FS1/E) and farmer-participatory or user-oriented research. By focusing more directly en lower resource farmers and their behavior in response to techuology, these approaches have allowed, at lasto for the differences between men's and women's roles in production to begin to be recognized and for the assumed homogeneity of the ferm household to be replaced by the concept of 'incrahousehold dynamics•.!he reorientation and methodologies embodied in the en-ferm. client-.. oriented approach have fundamentally altered the relationship between social science and agriculture in threa key waya that have providad fertile ground for the incorporation oE gender analyais. 1) expanding che ranga of social science disciplines ensased in agricultural devalopment work. Z) placing social scientists an techuology development teams, and 3) develaping institutional structures to previde a home base for the social scienees in agriculture.!hese changes have expanded the perspective of existins agricultural staff snd brought new profesaionsls, many with genáer analysis expertise, into the agricultural field. Application of gendar aualysi! tools to the iterative procedures of client-oriented techuology davelopment is beginning to change the way production problems are identified. ehe unáerstanding of division of labar, snd the natura of farmer participation.!he toola of gender analyais are more than ehecklists or guidelines for data collection. Instead, they are analyticsl frameworks designed specifically ta deal with gender issae. (Overholt et al. 198';leldstein and Poats, 1990). !hey lead to the design of interventions and action strategies which will ensure that men and women are better integrsted into on-going development efforts. l., s recent FAO study, the ineorporation of gender frameworks into the work of researeh snd áevelopment organi:ations has been shown to be intimately linked to five conditions: 1) making changes in poliey mandates; 4) having sufficient profesaional staff with gender expertise; and 5) eubancing overall human resource eapaeity through training (Poats and Russo. 1989.) Available evidenee indieates that while the first four eonditions are necessar¡. the fifth appears to be critical.A survey of projects using on-farm research approaehes found that while there was a correlation between having women andlor social leientists on teams and whether or not gender analys!s was conducted, not all women or social scientists were suceessful in eondueting ¡ender analysis (Poats, Gearing and Russo 1989.) Their presenee did not guarantee attention to gender issues. However. in all cases where training (either formal or informal) in ¡ender issues and analyais occurred. project members did subsequently conduct or improve gender analyaia. Training of professional staff aeross and up and down the hierarchy of a project or an organization can signifieantly alter cultural views that have caused ¡ender blindness and can be a critical step in leaming how to do ¡ender analysis and how to incorporate ¡ender sensitivity as part of the normal way of doing good work.111. Gender Issues in the Donor Community.The FAO study mentioned aboye reported on a number of organizations that are using training as a key tool for promoting the incorporation of gender analysis. Amang the institutions included in the study were. the World Bank. the U.S. Agency for lntemational Development (USAID), the Canadian Intemational Oevelopment Agency (ClDA). the United Nations Development Program (UNOP). the Intemational Oevelopment Research Centre (IDRC). the Australian lntemational Development Assistance Bureau (AIDAB), the Overseas Oevelopment Administration (ODA), the 5wedish Intemational Oevelopment Agency (SIDA). the Asian Institute of Management (AIM) , the United Nations Population lund (UNFPA) and a number of U.5., Canadian, !uropean and lndian Universities. Institution-wide training courses designed to introduce gender issues in development and to train staff in the use of gender analysis tools have been key elements in the process of incorporating a gender perspective into the development agendas of ehese organizations.In another study, Eva Rathgeber (1987), Women in Development specialist 4 ae ¡ORC, reviewed ehe official position taken by nine donors on gender issues , and described the efforts they are making to ens\"~. greater benefit for women from development aid projects. Like those described in the FAO study, .' many of these donors are major actors in the support of ehe CGIAR System. It ie clear that as a result of specific poliey statements, training of project managers and designera, and qualified leadership in the subject matter. many donors are now guiding their funding choices with explicit attention to gender issues. This fact alone provides a strong rationale for the CGIAR Centers to strangth the attention given to gender in tne agenda for iñtemational agricultural researcn and development.For tnose who have added gender analysis to eheir toolkits for the diagnosis of farm level problema and t~e design or adaption of new technology, the response ia an overwhelming yeso Examples al tne dilference gender makes can be found in much of the literature cited in the case studies and otner references to this papero !here are several eflorts in progre s s to further document methodologies used where gender made a difference. A few examples fram agricultural researcn on food crops and livestock, the key concems af the CGIAR System, may be useful for those wno are unfamiliar with gender issues or ere still skeptical.In Colombia, en on-farm bean and fertilizer researeh project (Ashby 1990) did not initially inelude women's perspectives an bean varieties beeausel prevailing wisdom at the time held that only men were engaged in the productian af beans. Cued by some unexplainable anomalies in the preferences by some hausehalds for bean varieties designated as unmarketable by the project researehers, the team decided to use participant observatian tools to further explore internal nousebold decision-making about bean variety preferences and selection. !hey leamed of the multiple roles of beans in the household and the women's key role in influencing the choice of bean varieties for production. As a result the team retained bean varieties in the on-fa~ testing program that would have othervise been discarded by breeders. !Dcluding both men and women as users of be ana revealed new information about. the eharacteristics and the proeess that farmar. use to guide bean selection or rejection. !hese proved valuable to bean breeders and subsequently made a difference to the direction of the bean researeh in the projeet.In. Zambia, Chabala and Gichiru (1990) documented the experiences of an on-farm researeh team (agronomist, agricultural economist and extension specialist) that eonducted its early diagnosis of produetions problems only amang male farmers. Growing concem over timeliness and competing needs for labor as the critical constraint to improving crop production led the team to eonduct a detailed study of household labor resources and allocation. Recognitian of the !ncreasing populstion of female headed households in the research are a (some 30% or more of all households due to male out-migration primarily to mining regions) led to shifts in the approachea used to identify reeommendation domains snd potential users of technology. Reducing the labor raquirement especially amang women responsible fer weeding became a research priority and led to an experiment mixing maiz •• th. dominant men's erap, vith beana, a key caah crep grown by women. Both eropa vere traditionally groWn separataly. By combining them, the researchera hoped te take advantage of well-known complementar¡ nutrit!,nal interaction. as well as decreasing the amount of weedin& time, since both could be weeded simultaneously. However, in farmer evaluations of the technolegy that ineluded both female and male farmer partieipants in the trial, women voiced their negative reactians to the teehnology. When beana vere planted en land normally allocated to maize, the women lost ownership of the beans and men benefited from the cash generated by I 1 \\ their sales. Sinee men and women operated separate ineome streams within households and eaeh had different respon,ibilities to fulfi11 with their cash, 10ss of the bean income to women could decrease the welfare of the household as a whole. Researchera were informed by this experienee of gender diffarenees in the eriteria for a 'sueeessful' teehnology. Their next researeh steps would have to eonsider whether women's ownership of beans could be retained while using mixed cropping teehnology or if other labor conserving technologies would 'fit' more appropri,tely with the existing gender segregated cropping system.A final example comes for the Philippines and coneems an integrated pest management (IPM) project (Adalla, 1988). !he project initially worked with male farmer cooperators. IPM i9 generally considered as a concept that ia difficu1t initial1y to comprehend and involves a lot of management decision-making. As such, IPM i9 often thought to take longer time to leam snd as a technology, more difficult to adopto In the project, though researchers felt farmers were beginning to understand the concept, few if any were edopting. In searching for en explanation, researchers found that though men did lndeed do the physical labor associated with managing pests, women al so played a crucial role. 'lt was the wife who dictated the specific brand or kind of pesticides to buy and the dosage to use, based on friend's recommendations or based on experiences of the husband as to which poison kilI s mosto Bowever, in a tight financial situation the declaion la to settle for the least expensive kind ••• • (Adalla, 1988). Even if the male farmers did see a potential value in IPM, their wives continued to purchase pesticides. Once the researchers understood the role women played in determining the choices in pest management technology, women were invited to participate directly in the lPM discussions and training. Subsequently, there was an increase in the use of IPM'because women understood the alternatives to pesticides. In addition, involvement of the women resulted in a project to develop IPM toola appropriate to their vegetable•gardens.These three example9, dealing with different cropa and widely differing socio-cultural and agroecological settings, show clearly that gender makes a difference. In each case, when researchers pursued 'who is doing what' in the production system, they discovered that initial suppositions were wrong and that both women and men were involved and needed te be considered in the technology development process.The above sections have outlined both the progresa and difficulties encountered by the agricultural development sector in understanding gender issues and using gender analysis. The lARCs, aS leadera in the intemational community of agricultural practitioners, need te take a serious look at the critical role and example they must play in furthering this perspective and enhancing the use of gender analysis in reaching viable solutions for the production problems of !hird Vorld agriculture.The remainder of this paper reviews the progresa ano problema in accounting for gender within the CGlAR System and recommends a courae of action for the future.'v.CGIAR Recammeudationa &ud Áctional 1981-86.Attention to gender issuea in the CGlAR System began with su early call to consider the importanca of women in agricultural production. The Report of the 1981 Quinquannial Raview Committea on eha CGIAR System states tha issue as follows.'In many parts of tha developing,world, women play an importsut role in agricultural production, for example. as farm owners, managers, sales agents, sud field workers. Too often, this role has been overlookad rasulting in reducad impact or even total failure oE programmes related to agricultural development. Conaequently, it ia important that the System should give explicit attention to the role of women wherever relevsut to its work. In particular, Centers should review their programmes, particularly those on farming eystema, to ensure that the role of vamen i8 specifically considered and that the possibility af differential benefits to men sud vomen i8 analyzed. Furthermore, ve consider that TAC should ensure that the impact en women of th. 5ystem's work i8 fulIy taken into account in designing and evaluating programmes of work (Para. 7.114, p. 97, Report of Review Committee, 1981, t'aken frem MUCIA 1983.S.) ,4 'While these recommendations call for explicit action, little vas' immediately takeu. In 1982, Barbara Knudson and Jean Veideman of the Midwastem Universities Consortium on Intemational Agricultura (HUCIA) gave a presentation at Intemational Centers Veek on a proposal far a collaborative program on women and agricultura betwaen the HUCIA Vamen in Development Network and the IARCa (MUCIA 1983). The program vaa to provide consultation ~ servic., and the development of educational materials and training modules on women's productive roles in agricultura. Though the program was not funded, it was eh. first time the subject of directing IARC research activities towards to specific techuological needa of women farmers vas discussed among the donor and IARC representatives in plenary session at an ICV.In hindsight. it ia likaly that ehe proposal was befo re its time. Few people anywhere were making the link between techuology development and the varying techuical needa and constraints of different potential usera of nev techuology. However. tha follaving year, the situation began to changa vithin the CGIAR 5ystem.4The Committae addrassed a separate but relatad issue in its Report. whare additiona1 recommendations urge attention to the apeeial needa for training women as scientists bn.~ as potential members oE staff for the institutions and as future research leaders in tha developing countries (Para. 5.56 citad in MUCIA 1983.S). The Review -•~ttee advised the CGIAa' .. o 'make vigorous efforts to increase the partici-jn av wamen as profess1onal staff and to identify vomen qualified for member an Boarda of Trustees and of other CGIAR bodies, \" and to inaure that \"th' :retariat should report to the Group. at appropriata intarvals, en progre ~de in ehese respects' (Para. 7.11S.p.97 cited in MUCIA 1983.5)...• In September 1983, IRRI convened an international conference on women's concerns in rice farming. Biological scientists. social scientists and policymakers from 21 countries discussed whether women have benefited from the introduction of new rice technology, how wamen might benefit from emerging technologies, and how women's roles in technology development and transfer might be enhanced (IRR! 1987). The conference was the catalyst that launched activities at IRRI leading to the establishment of the Women in Rice Farming 5ystems (WIRFS) Program in 1986. How ~d why this program has be en successful i8 discussed later in this report. The monograph published from the conferenee, Women in Rice Farming (1985), set an example for national and international agricultural research institutions to begin exploring the direet technical relationships between speeifie production systems and women farmers. Conference participants also made three recommendations to the CGIAR 5ystem as a whole: 'l. The CGIAR should organi~e an inter-center seminar tor Policy-makers on Women in Farming 5ystems Improvement based on the work in all lARes. AlI CGIAR members eould be invited to participate $0 that donors can contribute to the action research projects of the kind recommended.' '2. The TAC to the CGIAR should add the following to the Terma of Reference and Guidelines for external program reviews of the lARCs: 'Examine the research and training programe of the institute in relation to their potential impact on women-specific occupations with s view to diversifying employment opportunities. generating sdditional income. snd reducing drudgery.\" '3. Centera themselves could monitor progresa during their annual program reviews.' These recommendstions contributed to the decisions on mea sures taken by the System as a whole to explore the gender question. At its annual meeting (ICW) in November 1983, following the IRRI conference, the CGIAR commissianed a wide-ranging impact study of the results of the activitiea of the IARCs under its sponsorship. At this time, the Impact Study leader! and Advisory Committee recognized the need fer a separate study on gender iasuea. Conducted by Jsnice Jiggins during 1984-85, the study produced a series of sector specific papera (on liveatock, breeding. post-harvest issuas. etc.) that ware later compilad into a single volume. Gender-Related Impacts and the Werk of the International Agricultural Research Centera (1986).While the Impact Study was still underway. tvo conferences brought CGIAR Centers and gender iaaues together. In 1984 the Rockefaller Foundation hosted a conference entitled 'Understanding Africs's Rural Bouseholds and Farming 5ystems' (Moock 1985.) Though focused on\" one speeific region and not targeted ta the CGIAR 5ystem. psrticipants did include representatives from a number of IARCs and danora af the CGIAR.S The canference attempted to reconeile the divergent methodalogical and conceptual ~ssues between Fsa/E as it was being conducted at the time and the body of household research eondueted largely by social scientists. Progress was made in the exchange of ideas. experiences and methods. however, more than one partieipant characterized the confarencs as two bodies of researehers speaking past eaeh other. Fsa/E praetitioners at ehe time were still very reluctant to aeknowledge the need for a gender disaggregated understanding of the Afr!can household and social scienee researchera examining the Afriean houaehold vera not generating the kinds of analy'is that could lead easily to teehnieal decision-making. It was obvious that more cowmunieation between these two groups would be neeessary to arrive at a cohesive analytical framework.In Mareh 1985. ISNAR snd the Rackefeller Foundation co-sponsored a weeklong intar-cantar seminar at Sellagl0. Italy on Women and Agricultural Technology: The Usars' Perspective in Intemational Agricultural Research (Rockefeller/ISNAR 1985 Vals. I and II.) The abjectives af the meeting were to assess ehe eurrent aetivities in ehe Centera related to a more effective integration of women in the modemization of agriculture and to seek possible ways of improving the performance of the CGIAR Syatem on this issue. The thirty participants in the seminar included seven Director Generals. members of the CGtAR Secretariat and rAC, several representatives of Donora, university and national program laadera. and selectad tARC social scientists with experience in gender issues and analysis.Prior to the seminar. twelve of the thirteen tARCs prepared background papers on their experienees to date with the 'users' perspective' and women as users of tachnology. (IBPCa did not prepare a paper but did participate in the aeminar.) In addition. three regional background papers on women in Africa. Asia and Latin America vere prepared. All background papers were cireulated in advance so that the seminar itself was devoted to analytical presentationa and discussion.The seminar serves as a benehmark for the CGtAR System on user perspectives and gender issues. The papers prepared for ehe aeminar summarize the experiencea. shortcominga. success stories and projeeted needs for the future in order to conduct gendar-aware researeh. On the positive sida, six of the tARCs provided fairly claar evidence of snalytical applicationof gander issues to problema of technology development. Several Cantera gave examples of specific technology changes in arder to suit needa of women usara. Some of the reports were less positive.Thre~ of the tARe reports dealt with gender issues mostly in terma of including more women in training programa and provided little more than token evidence of gender analysis in their research programa. Two of the Center S Included amang the participants at ehe c~nference vere scientists and managers from. CIMMYT. lITA. lCARDA, IC~~E. ILCA, IITA, ICRISAT. the formar Agricultural Development Couneil (now a ;:rt of WINROCK Intemational), Ford Foundation. USAID. the World Sank. and the lockefeller Foundation. 10 l l , . J reports are notable for their virtual laek of mention of women or gender issues. (Ihe only mention in one was an¡aim to look at the relationship betveen nutrition and women's, in particular mothers•. work patterns.) That reports commissioned for a eonferenee dealing vith women and teehnology could leave out women entirely raises eoneern. Finally. one report presented a negatively biased viev af women's roles in produetion aud misinterpreted existing data on gender issues from the region of the Center's responsibility .Ihe conference confirmad that several Centers vere already vell engaged in gender-sensitiva research on seme topics and vere taking stapa to alsure that gender analyai, would be included in other areas of responsibility. Ihe coneluding statements of the participants affirmed several key points Ó on the relevanee of women's and gender issues to research. that gendar is an important variable in distinguishing among potential beneficiary groups far agricultural technolagy researeh and poliey analyaia ¡ that female farmera do not form a homogeneous group lor development purposes and gender and other variables need to be considered in defining categories of people for research and development aetivities¡ that choice of technological approach i8 based on more than.the production procesa itself; it is based on the entire food and economic context of the hOUBehold and women play an active part in that choice; that the economic contribution of women to the household can be disrupted and disadvantaged by the introduction of well-intentioned technological change, particularly when biased towards male heads of households; and that women are crucial repositories of information on plant and animal species as well as technical aspects of production practices and useful insights are lost when women are ignorad.Ihe aem1nar confirmad the need for complementarity betveen the LARCs and national programs in addressing gender iasues and women's participation in the technology development procesa. Characterizing the relationship as a team effort requiring more two-way flow of information, the seminar participants called for: increased, systematic use of information and cooperation in raising avareness of gender issues at national and international program levels; 6 These issues are drawn directly from the Concluding Statement oE the report preparad on the seminar (Rockefeller/ISNAR 1985 Vol.I) and from an interview with Josette Murphy, then with ISNAR, conducted following the seminar and reported inCGIAR News Vol. 5. No. 2, June 1985. 11 , develapment af a lang-term $tra~egy ta consider women in all phases of research and development work; greater collaboratian and recognition af complementarity amang the lARCs, especially between the commedity centers and IFPRI and ISNAR; and• inclusion of gender issues in the evaluatien of the impact of lARC work at the national systema level.Final1Y, the coneluding statement of the seminar listed a set of suggestions for the CGlAR System as a whele that are summari:ed below:Gender issues must be linked to the entire technology generation procesa.Z) lARCs should collaborate with national organi:ations in generating' information and methodologies dealing vith gender issues.3) Interdisciplinary teama of leientists should identify specific areas in which gender makes a differenee to the effectiveness and effieiency of lARe work.Inter-center exchanges among natural and social scientists to discuss speeific issues in incorporating gender into research plana and proeedures need to be organi:ed.High-quality studies should be commissioned and widely disseminated on the e:periences of and methodolagies for incorparating gender issues.6\" lARCs an~ national programa should offer more training opportuni:ies for women, find vays to increase the number of female extension workers to reach farm vomen, and pay specific attantion to gender factors in on-farm raseareh.Taken together, the seminar statements affirming the need for understanding ¡ender issues, calling for collaboration between international and national researeh entities, and laying out speeifie sug¡estions for the CGIAl System. represent a very positive step towards ¡ender sensitivity for ehe entire System. In effect. the conference 'sigoaled ehe beginning af a system-wide dialogue on the lubject of women and agricultural development' (CGlAR News 1985).However. two critical elemants vere :e •• ~.f of the agenda.First, no mechanism vas developed to insure that the System would follow' ehe seminar suggestions. Instead, as Josette Murphy, currently st ehe World Bank, e:plains (COlAR Newe 1985), 'it vas 1eft to each center to decide exactly vhat it needs te do under its mandate and how it should go about doing it. Reporting and other administrative requirements vere not included to 1Z avoid artificial isolation of the issue.' While the argument for not isolating gender iasues i5 val id, the 1aFk of System-wide mechanisms to require, evaluate and monitor progress in this area has contributed to the great unevennesa in Center attention to gender iasues. To a large extent, those Centers that were already beginning to deal with gender issues, at least in some program areas, have continued to do so, provided that the people wha had the eapacity to direct and conduct the ~ork have remained at the Centers. Only one Center, IRRI, has developed a~ explicit program to take leadership for gender iatues. Those where the issues were weak or misdirected in 1985 have, with few exceptions, continued in the same fashion to presento Secand, no consideration was given aa to how Centera were to go about capacitating their scientific and management staff tO be ab!e to incorporate gender issues. Those present at the seminar represented on1y a tiny pereentage of the total staff of the CGIAR System. They could also be eharaeterized as being 'the already converted' within the System. How would the larger numbers of scientists, managers and po1ieymakers for the System be sensitized to gender issues1 Where would they leam the skil1s and methods ta be able to incorporate gender concems into their work1 j Over100king these tvo eoncems has meant that while the System has ¡ ca1led for attention to the issues. on1y the committed few have taken and continae to take action. Until these areas --evaluation and capaeitatian are addressed, gender iasues will not beeome part of the most critieal task of the CGIAR 5ystem. the techuology generation process.Following the Bellagio Seminar. many tARC 8cientists proceeded ta communlcate results of gendar-related researeh in severa1 international meetings. To some extent, the Bellag10 Seminar may have at last validated the topic as legitimate for discussion outside the Centera. if not within. Papers by Center scientists were included at the 1986 Conferenee at the University of Florida on Gender Issues and Farming Systems Researeh and Extension (Poats et al, 1986), at several meetings of the Assoeiation for Women in Oevelopment (AVIO) , and at the annua1 Farming Systems Research and Extensian Symposium.In 1986, Janiee Jiggins's report for ehe CGlAA Impact Study was released. It added numerous examples. both from within and outside the IARC work, where taking sender lnto aecount made a differenee in tne development and adoption of techuology. She reiterated many of the concems aud suggestions from the previous Bel1agio conference with twO important additions. She called for exp1ieit attention to the links between varietal characteristics. productlon and domestie proeessing. In arguing for ear1y attention to preservation and preparation techuologies, she identified these areas as large1y a female doma in and one that ia normally exeluded from all but a very few IARC programa.Second. ahe high1ighted the lack of underatanding of mu. 1 tl -,-'. ose uses for mueh of the biomass produced by rural househoJñs. Oefining researeh objectives in terma of single uses for crop or live~lock products often disadvantages users. frequent1y women, of the other traditiona1 products from these same commodities.Jiggins's report has been wide1y circu1ated and cited among the intemationa1 community of researchers and deve10pment workers addressing 13 , gender issues. lt has joined a growing set of literature on gender issues and agricultural development. The increasing call for further discussion and action on gender issues and analysis led the CGIAR Secretariat to organiza a half-day special seminar on 'Gender lssues: User Impact, Agricultural Technology and the Global Agricultural aesearch System' at the 1987 International Centers' Week. While the 1983 conference at lRaI and the 1985 seminar at Bellagio had brought together a range of CGIAR System leaders and specialists on gender issues. the lCW $eminar in 1987 was the first time sinee 1982 that the entire systam. donors. Centerl, Secretariat and TAC discussed the question of gender and agricultural technology.The ICW 1987 Seminar OA Differential Uaera: Sammary and aecommendations on Gendar Issus. 7• .•• it•s not so much tbat women are the issues; it's ehe issues that women are concerned with is what our focus must be.' (W. David Hopper. World Bank)!he foeus of the ICW seminar was the naed to underatand the potential impact of agricultural technology on diaadvantaged user groups. particularly women. !h~ee themes were addressed by the presentations and the discussions:Bow can the research procesa bring user implications to bear in technology choice?2) What are the respective roles of national research systems and international centers in incorporating user considerations into technology design?3) Baw far have th. centera themselves progressed in achieving gender balance and incorporating it into research and training activities1Finally, given the wide differences in Center reaction to the gender issue question. ehe possible usefulness of a Stripe aeview on the suhject was raiaed.!he saminar included five presentations. comments by a selected panel, and open discussion from the floor. Immediately follawing the saminar. ehe CGIAR Secretariat summarized the overarching recommendations from the discussion.!hat the centers play a role in bringing processes and methods to national systema which allow deciaion on research ehrusts and on technology choice to he made in the light of the needs of and potential impacts on different user groups.7 T he information presented in this section draws di:ectly upon the transcript of the ICV 1981 Seminar on Differential.Users. All of the quotations in ehe section come from the transcript prepared by Miller Reporting Company. lnc. October 28, 1987.That the Group should reeeiv, information on progresa in this area. and in the balaneing of gendera at the eentera themselves. on a routine basia.3) That external reviews of centera take up gender as an explicit Lssue in the questions aaked of, eenters and in their reportoIn addition to these. most of the participants made additional reeommendations and raised questions for further consideration during their preaentations. Drawing upon the transcript of the seminar. these additional issues are summarized here.Margaret Catley-Carlson. CIDA, outlined three essential elements to effect institutional adoption of a gender perspective: a clear. agency-wide policy mandating attention to gender as a development variable; an aetion plan. ereated from bottom-up for implementing the poliey; and training for all stsff, starting with those at the topo These elements sre spplieable not just to donora. but to the Centers as vello Catley-Carlaon alao laid down the donor bottom line by saying, 'for those of us who invest millions, iE not bil1ions. ol dol1ars in intemationa1 development, it's quite 8i1ly to go on doing so il ve're not targeting the actual aetors in the procesa.' All of the presenters highlighted the need for the ineorporation of user considerations in technology development and the essential inc1usion of gender analysia as a critical element in determining user groups. However. ineluding a 'gendered' user perspective raised other concems. Given the location speeificity of user group pattems and needs. how can the lARCs. with a broad mandate to develop technology for the range of users embraced by individual national programe, orient research output and research program planning to al1 of these differing user needa? Concerning this question, Bob Herdt. Roekefeller Foundation, clarified that the key role ol the lARCs ia to develop appropriate analytical methods to address user coneems. These methods must be oriented to the challenge ol identifying innovative technologies that vill have a positive impact on the general groups that are the ultimate CGlAR System elients: the poor. the women. and the disadvantaged. The lARC responsibility is to provide leadership and training in these methods as part of their overall mandate. Ashby's presentation underseored the lARC role vis-a-vis national programs.'A user-orientation in the research agenda, such as giving priority to commodities or activities where women are likely to benefit from research, reflects valuea which are not necessarily shared in all cultures where NARS operate. The lARCs have the opportunity to show by their example. the relevance of user-orie~'-' research to attaining the objective of improve1 food availability for the poor. To the extent that resaurces illvested by lARCs in networks, training, and methodology development reflect concern with apecific groups of usera, eommitment i5 l!kely to be generated in national programa to reapond ta user prioritiea in the reaearch procesa.' Opponents of the user perspective and a concern for gender issues often fall back on the argument that the role pf the LARCs is to generate what might be called 'generic technology'. This is then adapted to local conditions by national programs, or in some cases, local user groups, in the process of developing 'brand-name technology'. While the boundaries between what is !ARC work and what is NARS work are often fuzzy, the seminar discussion highlighted the importance of feedback along the resear~h chain to identify user relevant priority thrusts at the applied and sti8tegic levels. User concerns and information must play a strong role in informing the research agenda from the beginning. Technology developed at strategic and applied levels in isolation from user concerns and criteria, will likely be insulated from user adoption.'The diversity of user circumstances and of potential impacts which can arise from technological change means that user implications ultimately have to be accommodated in technology design through greater involvement of users in problem definition and technology evaluation. The issue at this level is fundamentally one of how to institutionalize the participation of users in the research process to inform research strategy and orient technology design.' (Ashby presentation) On-farm, client-oriented or farming systems research within the LARCs will continue to have the greatest responsibility for the user perspective in research. However, to carry this out effectively, beyond its concern with technology adaptation, FSR must increasingly emphasize a feedback role engaging in the dynamics of research priority-setting and strategy-building. And, most importantly, FSR will have to accommodate methods which can account for the gender and intrahousehold differentials in technology impactoThe case experiences discussed in the seminar confirmed that efforts to right the gender imbalance in agricultural research are better placed as part of the mainstream effort rather than as special women's projects which may further isolate the problem and solution from the general bureaucracy.Patel's presentation on adaptive research and gender issues in Zambia brought out another critical issue: the rapidly growing numbers of femaleheaded households due to male-outmigration. Though in southern Africa, this situation is reaching drastic proportions, it is occurring at a rapid rate in all developing countries. The growing feminization of agriculture, especially food crop production, will have profound implications on the definitions of user needs for research and the ability and resources of poorer farmers and households to adopt improved technology. Gender sensitive analysis will need to play an even stronger role in determining the differences among women farmers as well as between male and female farmers. Given the mandate of the CGLAR System as a whole to increase the amount, quality and stability of food supplies for poor people in low-income countries, the Centers must deal vith the fact that ur.'ess the trends are quickly and drastically altered, the maj ority of _\"e faces of their clients in the near future vill be female.Though most of the seminar discussion focused on the users of technology, a parallel thread addressed the gender imbalances among the designers and managers of the technology innovation process. the researchers, staff. management and boards of the Cent,rs. In the final seminar presentation. Richard Sawyer. Director General of CIPo underscored the need to increase the number of vomen professionals in the CGlAR System. He pointed to the lack of vomen in the centers themselves. on the boards and within the Technical Advisory Committee and the CGlAR secretariat itself. Using CIP as sn example, he recommended that other centers actively recruit women professionals into their ranka vithout,sacrificing quality for equity. However. he wamed against getting too involved with the internal politica of national programs in trying to balance gender inequities ameng participants in lARC training cauraes.Echoing the concems of Sawyer, John Mellor. Director General of IFPRI, notad that 'sometimes ve forget, as we look at the question of gender. what a powerful force the combination or juxtaposition of latent racism and sexism represent in the world. 0 0 0 ve need to give some special attention to that interaction within intemational organizationso' While the attention of the lARCs and the entire agricultural research establishment to the gender iSBue is long overdue, the discussion during the seminar revealed another problem. Gender refera to men and women, not just women. The use of gender analysh is not gender specific. Male and femal.e researchers can be equally proficient at gender analysis. Likevise. a woman researcher trained in a narrow technical discipline can be as gender-bíind as a male trained in the same profession. Both need training in the skills of gender analysis to become proficient and effective in applying it to their work. So, hiring more women scientists, unless they are specifically trained in gender analyaia techniques, will not rectify a gender bias in the technology generation process. Á surprising number of the participants at the seminar seemed by their comments to be confused en thia issue. !he implications of confusing affirmative action or \"the equity issue\" and the 'efficiency lasae' of gender analyai' in development, are discussed later in this paper.In the final comments of the aeminar, Janiee Jiggins brought the discussion back to the need to assess the progresa made, and yet to be made. by the Centers in dealing with user perspectives and gender issaes. She observed that very practical and constructive efforts have be en made by some Centera both internally and in collaboration with national programa. Other havebeen far more hesitant and she po sed the question why some Centera rema in reaistant to gender. As a prelude to exploring this issue, the next section presents some examples of the strategies used by various Centera to addresa user needs and gender analysis in technology development.Before moving on, it is important to note that gender has surfaced at least twice more among the centers since ehe ICW 1981. One was during the Internaeional Agricultural Research Centen Wo,:kshop on Human Resouree Development Through Training. held at CIP, ~ima, Peru. in September 1988. In the summary report listing major issues and recommended aetiona. number 14 reads as follows.'Women in Human Resouree Development in Agriculture.Canters recognize that woman farmars are an important target pop~lation and that action should be taken to.encourage the participation of women in their training programs. 'Recommandation: That centara develop training material. which peint o~t the importance oi reaching women as a neglected target group ior technology development and al so explo~e methods for improving the participation of women in center.training activitie •• 'A second time gender issues vere raised was at ICW 1989. when sevaral donors discussed the issue in smallar gro~p sassiona as vall as in tha plenary. They called for a report en the progresa made since tha 1987 ICW seminar on the incorporation of gender and usar issuea in the Centera. This report.is a first response to that request.VII. Strategia. fer Gendar Issuas: izamples fra. tha Systam. 8From the previous sections of this paper. it is quite clear thst there is no 1ack oi recommendations to guide the CGIAR 5ystem in dealing with gender issues. Howevar, as stated in the beginning, the applicatien and use of the recommendations is quite uneven ameng the 13 Canters. Based upen the literature froal ehe system reviewed fer this pap'er, the Centen can be grouped into three categories. The first comprises those Cantera with a clear mandate or policy on gendar issues, an operating research program that has a focus on gender, training in gender analysia. and a commitment to a gender balance among stafE and trainees. The only Centar in thia category ia IRaI.The second group consista of Centera where individual scientists have 8 A thorough review oE all gender-relatad activities undertaken by tne CGIAR System vaa beyend the acope of th!. papero Instead, a purposive searen vas made to find examples oE successes and then to identify the factors tnst encouraged suecess and the lessons leamed from the ezperienee. This search was done by interviewing a number of people who hold current positions within tne 5ystem and otherawho ~sed to work vith the Cantera. The selected interviews vere complemented by a rapid content analyais of the most recent reports snd documents from the CGIAR. TAC and the Cantera themselves. Annual reports from asch Center (lIIOstly for the yean 1988 or 1989) vere reviewed to locate sny referances to women. ¡ender, household. er intra-household issues. Specisl p~blications. joumal articles and project reports were also scanned. Where availsble, strategy statementa and long-range planning documents vere reviewed. In addition. saveral external progrma and managementa reviews vere st~died to see whether reviewen had complied vith recOllllll.endations from the CGIAR to include gender iasues in the regular reviev procesa of ehe Canters. Finally, several of the CGIAR I.aI'/'Iact Studies vere alao included in the review.All of the documents ~on~y~ted in this review are listed in the referencls to the paper, including documents that vere stu~~ed but not cited directly. A large part of the literature consulted was provided by the CGIAR Secretariat offiee in Washington. D.C.done good work either directly on gender issues or have incorporated gender analysis into an on-going research direcfion. !hese Centera do not have a clear policy on gender and the work that has been done on gender, even when recognized internationally, appears to have a limited audience within the Center. In some instancea, such work ia given brief mention in annual reports, but in most cases, the results remain at the level of projects and programs, dOBa and not aerve to inform the center effort as a whole. Seven Centera fall into this category. CIAT, CIMHYT. CIPo lCARDA, IFPRI. lITA, and YARDA.The final category include those Centers where there vas very little sttention or mentíon of gender or women in the documenta reviewed. Some of the Centera in this group made no mention at all in any of the documents reviewed. others have some minor mention in project related reports. but usually nothíng at the level of the annual report or strategic plan. Ihis group includes: ISNAR. IBPGR. ILRAD, ICRISAT, and ILCA.From the first two groups, a number of strategies can be identified that would be useful to other canters in the System. I have selected three for discussion. Among these, considerable attention i9 given to IRRI due to the length and depth of that institution's experience. Several other examples are given at the end of the aection.!he most auccinct statement on IRRI's position regarding vomen and gender iasuea ia found in 'IRRI Toward 2000 and Beyond', Of the five IRR! policies laid out in the document to guide the future of the institution, the fourth i9 atated as 'vomen and rice', The brief summary of the policy reads: 'Yomen and rice. Affirmative action will be taken in recruitment, in selection of candidates for training and in research design to address tbe roles of women in IRR! itself. in national rice programs, and as users and beneficiaries of rice tachnology.' p. 23.•An expanded version of the policy provides some additional information about the program and its results.'rhe role of women in rice research and rice farming has both efficiency and equity implications. IRRI has be en sensitive to this issues for many years. Some progress has been made in regard to women in IRRI itself, in national rice programa, and as usera and beneficiaries of rice technology, but much remaina to be done.Ye recognize and uphold the principle of affirmative action in the recruitment of all staff at IRRI, Ye will intensify our effores to recruit qualified women scientists and administrators. Ye a)80 aim to increase the proportion of women in IRRI graduate and posedoctoral fellow programa snd short-term training programs.Ye vill continue to promete the integration of women'9 concerns into all research projects in IRRI and in national programa. Specificslly, gender anaIyais vill permit recognition of the centribution of vemen to rice produc:tion. marketing, &nd eepsumption; teehnolegies that reduce the burden on women vithout displacing their income-earning eapacity vill be developed, &nd researc:h on rice processing vill aim at conserving the level of essential nutrients. These ac:tivities vill help US te focus more sharply on the whole family as the ultimate beneficiarof rice researeh.• •The eornerstene ef lRAI's foeus on women and gender issuea is the Women and Rice Farming Systems Program (WIRFS). WIRFS traces its history te the Women in Rice parming conferenee held at IRRI in 1983. In addition te the reeommendatiens made by the c:enference to the Systam as a whole (mentioned earlier) participants also ealled for lRAI to organiza a network on women snd rice farming sy.tema for the Asian region. In 1984, a eonsultant vitb longterm expertise in women and rice produc:tion, Jennie Dey (currently vitb FAO). vas funded by the Pord Foundation to lay the groundwork for auch a network involving six countries. Bangladesh. India. Indonesia. Nepal, the ?hilippines. and Thailand.Following the Bellagio Conferenee on Women and Agricultural 1echnology, lRAI took steps to implement the rec:ommendation to davelop a long-term stratagy fer involving women in all phases of researeh and taehnology development work. In 1985, lRAI hald a projac:t dasign workshop to create WIRFS. Leadership for the first year vas provided by Gelia Castillo from the University of the PhiIippines, a notad scholar who vas aIraady sarving on the boards of several Centers. She coordinated WIRFS aetivities at lRAI. in the Philippines and within eountry members of the Asian network for rice farming systems. In 1986, WIRPS began aetion researeh vithin ene of lRAI's crop-Iivestock projec:ts (Paris, 1988). This work demonstrated te lRAl seientists snd management that introdueing a gender perspectiva mede a difference in research prierities and directions. as vall as identifying nev topies. such ss glutinous rice preparation, that had not previously been the subjeet ef lRAl research sttentien.On the basis of ehe inielal results of the WIRPS initiatives, the 1987 lRAI External Program Review recommended strengthening WIRFS york st the Institute. This reeommendation vas endorsed by tACo As a result, lRAI obtained funding from the Ferd Foundation for expanding WIRFS ac:tivities st lRAI snd within ehe network. To date, VIRFS has sponsored more ehan 26 different research projects. During the past two years, it has organized 11 workshops snd training eourses st national and international levels during 1988-1989. Funding from a number of other donora hss been obtained for many of the WIRFS aetivities ineIuding IDRC, ClDA, DANIDA, USAID, Rockefeller Foundation. snd a number of the Universities in the region. Over 81 papera or presentations haya been delivared by r~~ ~s of VIRFS on their work. at national and international eonferenees and workshopa between 1986-1989.The impres,ive rec• =d of WIRFS st lRAl la not duplic:ated st any of the oeher Centera. No othe~ :enter in the CGIAR System ~as a poliey ststement en women and gender issues. A number of critieal factors haya enabied lRAl to develop sueh s poliey anc, more importantly, gsin the nec:essary eonsensus among Center stsff and management. as vell as the partieipsting national programa and governments. to have it approved. These critical or 'conditioning' factors are listed below. 1 1)International legitimization for a focus on women and use of gender analysis. Tha lnternational conferences and external/international advisors have provided legitimacy and respect for the WIRFS effor~ in 'the eyes of the other members of the Institute. Donor funding has also assisted in legitimizing the effort.Sustained experienced leadership for WIRFS. The individual s leading the program have been qualified researehers in the social seienees with experience and training in gender analysis tocls.They were able to provide both scientific as well as mansgerlal leadership.3 All of these factors together have enabled the program to ¡et started and to begin to make s differenoe to soma of IRRI's york. At present, however, WIars i. at the end of ehe phaae of Pord Poundation funding snd vill hold a review in March 1990 to determine the future of the programo The review taam will have to deal vith several critical issues that vill determine the extent to which WIarS vill be continued.Pirst, leadership at lRaI has changed in the last yesr and the new management wants hard evidenca of WIarS strengths snd impacto WIarS internal leadership will also shift shortly with the departure of one of its two leadera. Under Swaminathan, junior scientiats at lRaI, many of wham are from the Philippines, vere given significant responsibilities. including the ability to travel outside the Institute to participate in regional and international activities. This is unusual amang ehe Centera. The prime \"mover' for ehe program during the past three yearl has been a Philippine woman with a M.S. degree. Though not senior IRRI staff herself. in the eyes of WIarS collaborators. ahe has represented and \"spokeu' for lRaI. Within lRaI, she ia a junior staff member and thus lesl able to influence ehe senior seientiata frem other programa. WIRFS has capitalized on the substantial cadre of Philippine women scientists for conducting WIRFS activities. The extent ta which this can continua should ba assaased. Alao, eritical attlntion needa to be given to the nead for a leader with senior ranking within ehe Institute in arder that the valuable lessons frem WI1FS activities ean influence the larger lRa1 program agenda.!he aecond issue ia that the program up to now has functioned largeIy in ehe mode of a apecial project focused on women. While gender analysis has been the working apparatus. the mode has been to operate through apecial projects snd teama that have been composed largely of women scientists.Partieipants in WIRFS activities have been mostly women. While it 15 importsnt to involve more wamen in ehe research work of the Institute, ie i8 esaentisl that the male scientists working in the mainstream be brought into \"s ¡ander vay of thinking.\" WIRFS has very successfully captured the 'converted' within and around lRa1 and gained the basic foundations of experience and results. Its challenge uow ia to mainstream the effort into the internal research program snd the larger rice farming systems network.Until recently. it waa difficult to find any mention of ¡ender or ot women in CIMMYT annual reports or strategy documents. However, CIMMYT's 1989 strategy statement. 'Toward the 21st Century, , includes a section dealing with 'Perspectives on Women in Agriculture.' In this statement. CIMHY't recogni;es the important role women play in agriculture snd the need ta identify the technical needa of women farmers. The statament also underlines the need to emphasize women's roles in production wi~hin CIHMYT's training programa, and the need to include more female participants in the training courses. CIHMYT's growing attention to gender issues is largely due to the results of gender-sensitive work conducted at various field sites.In an internal CIHMYT study on the impaet of the Center on women, Carney (1988) notes that 'the principal manne. in which CIHMYT has directed assistanee to'women in developing eountries ia through its work in on-farm researeh, known as on-farm researen with a farming aysteme perspective (OFR/FSPl.' Vithin its OFR activities, CIHMYT has reached women farmera in two broad re1ated areasl the development of methods for senaiti:ing researchera to the needa and circumstancea of a target group of farmers, and workshops and training programa in the effeetive use of the methods. The key OFR coneept directly relating to women fa~rs 19 the 'recommendation domain' whieh is a \"homogeneoua group of farmera who ahare the same problems and possess similar resources for salving these problems' (Low eited in Carney 1988). vnen applied.correctly, the recommendation doma in concept has the potential to identify production problema for women and men fa~rs and to angage women in on-farm research to solve these problema. The problem is that too often the method is not applied in a sufficiently unbiaaed manner. and recommendation domains are delineated aecording to the problems ahared by male farmers, not all farmers. However, the concept has great potential to facilitate the involvement of women farmers in tecbnology development.The seeond example ~omes from CIMMYT activities in Afriea. CIMMYT Eastern and Southern Africa Economics Program operates\"explicitly from an onfarm research perspective and has taken the lead in the region for providing training and national capacity building in adaptive research. From 1987, the CIMMYT program has taken steps towards ehe application of gender analys!s to agricultural researeh. In Apri1 1987, it sponsored a Networkshop on Household Issues and Farming Systems Research. The workahop included presentation of a case study incorporating gender analysis (Chabala snd Guichiru 1990), pspera by participants on the application of intra-household analyaís to trial design, farmer selection, and trial analysis, and general discussion of methodologies and issues related to the application of intra-household or gender anslyais to on-farm researeh (Alistair Sutherland 1987.) In 1989 and 1990, resource persona with expertise in the application of gender analyaia to agricultura1 research vere íncluded in Part 1 of CIHMYT's annual basle training eourse in on-farm research held at tne University of Zimbabwe. Participants are generally agronomists or agricultural economists from nationa1 systems who have not had formal training in OFR. The courae la divided into two parts: Part 1 cover, (' ~.vsis. informal and formal surveys snd runs for three weeks in February; Part 2, trial design and evaluation, runs for two weeks in September. !he schedule for Part 1 ia relstively tight sinee emphasis i9 put on fieId practicums. In 1990. the resource person gave a one hour lecture on gender analysia which included a slide show, methods for developing \"gender related\" cropping calendars. snd key definitions and questions; prepared a '¡endar sensitive' supplementary handout to the detailad guidelines for the informal,survey: led one group for the informal survey: anc prepared suggestions for further incorpofation of gender into the regular curriculum.!his kind of work by an e%temal training advisor is a good beginning. but still leaves gender analysis more or less as an add-on, not an integral part of the training. Gender as a useful ~d important variable needs to be threaded throughout the lectures, fie14 e%ercises, and field reports. While the foreshortened nature of each field e%ercise makes in depth questioning of farmers more difficult, some strategic, ahead-of-time planning and commitment on the part of the trainers could incorporate gender, an important variable in understanding farmer decision-making, as a natural part of the on-farm researcher's toolkit.One of the areas which does need to be addressed with more material in future courses is the approach to leaming about women and from women. Participants talked about the awkwardness of interviewing women--either because husbands were unwilling to have their wives intervieved alone or, vhen interviewed, women vere deferent in the presence of their husbands. It vas clearly an e%plicit barrier (probably hiding other deeper barriers) to better gathering of gender disaggregated information on the production system and therefore to the adequate inclusion of gender analysis.Another e%ample of a growing gender concem is highlighted in CIHMYT's ora work in Ghana. CIHMYT and Ghanaian researchers have become avare of the unique decision-making roles that vomen e%ercise in the choice of technology.\"In Northern Ghana, vomen will normally have the responsibilities of seed selection and planting of cereals, vhile decisions about other cultural practices, such as fertilizer selection and weed control, will often be made by meno !hus field-days that focus on the ma:~ring crop will normally only attract men, yet it is the women who maka many of the important decisions concerning choice of variety, time of planting and plant density and arrangement.\" (Edmeades, pers. comm. cited in Camey 1988).A recent study on changing maize production practices in Ghana showed that women adopt nev technologies as fast or faster than men (Tripp et al. 1987). But as Camey points out (1988:4) the fact that women only represented 15 percent of the study's sample and of these, only five grew maize as a monocrop. has uncovered additional areas that need to be researched. In fact. the team, as a result of such information, has begun several interesting nev initiatives. For e%ample, work is now being conducted on mi%ed cropping systems for maize because women farmers nearly alvays plant maize with other crops, such as cassava, and have been, thus far, uninterested in \".he m04o-crop techr.' SY developed by the project and adopted largely by male farmers. ~e project staff in Ghana have rese, ~h teams --all male members --inter~ct or collaborate in OFR work. nev Ghanaian reorganization that has recognized that the gender of the makes it difficult for vomen farmers to Therefore, they are collaborating vith a taken e%isting home economics extensionagenta --all vomen --and re-struetured them as th. Women Farmera Extenaion Serviee. The C1MMYT projeet i8 providing OFR training to a large group of these nev agrieultural agenta and intends to place them on field teama, lika male extension vorkers, vith the exp1icit objective of co1laborating more with women farmers. lt ia probably significant that the donor for this project is ClDA. and ClDA project offieers are insisting that CIDA's mandate regarding the incorporation of gender issues be foll~ed in the Ghana programo However, it was evident frem diseussions with C~ seientists in Ghana that they are strongly supportive of gender issues and eheir key coneem ia to 1eam appropriate methods for including gender iasues in the research procesa as vell as including WQmen in the on-farm triaIs.!hese experiences from C1MMYT's on-farm researeh program are good examples of how, both in training and in fieId work, gender iSluea can be ineluded and make a differenee. One can argue that at selected field and project interfaces, C1MMYT's research is being influenced by the results of gender analysis. However, as indicated in CIMMYT's strategy statement, concern for gender iasues is confined largely to on-farm research activities and th. Economies Programo As the Economics Program moves 'upstream,' away from adaptive OFR towards applied and ~trategie research. it will be important to continue to incorporate gender analysis within the nev research initiatives. Likevise. consideration of gender issues should move late rally into the coneems of both the wheat and maize programa.The pioneering efforts to develop a user orientation to reaearch and partieipatory researeh methods at CIAT by Jackie Ashby have already been discussed in this paper and are well-documented elsewhere (Ashby 1990(Ashby , 1987)).9 Ser efforts to incorporate gender issues snd analyais within the usar perspective have been very important. It 18 significant to note that Ashby's work has be en supported by and large by external. not cere funding. While this has provided a great deal of flexibility. it has al so contributed to the 'special project' status and the difficulty of influeneing other CIAT seientists with the results ef a gender sensitive research strategy. No mention is made of the research in the last two annual reports from the Center.In a reeent strategy documento CIAT in the 1990s. there i8 a statement under the bean program activities within the Africa section. that produetion ia by small farmara. mostly women, and ls predominantly subslstence (CIAT 1989). Unfortunately. there ls no further mention of whether this tact calls for any changes in agenda or methods of reaching farmers. No other program mentions gendar or women.Despite the lack of mention at higher levela of manageme~t,.in the 9 CIAr and lFDC collaborated in publishing an annotated bibliography on Women•, Agriculture, and Rural Development in Latin America by Jacqueline Ashby and SteUa Gomez (1985).lt ia one of the very few resources en women in agriculture in Latin America.bean programo and ta a les ser extent in the cassava programo there 15 increasiag attention ta and use of gender analysis methods. Breeding vark en besns at headquarters in has been significantly affected by Ashby's work in Colambia that has identified gender differentiated and user defined criteria for bean selectian.Within the Bean Program's Great Lakes, Pragram in Eastem Airica. two anthropolagists have placed attention qn women needs in bean development. Joachim VOIS, the first anthropologist vith the team based in Rvenda, illuminated the fact that the majority, if not all. of the bean producers in the region of the program vere women. tf they did not focua on women, they would miss the farmers entirely.Louise Sperling. the current anthropologist vith the team, has built upon Voss'a earlier york and the CIAT experiences in farmer participatory research and designed an innovative strstegy ta bring farmer's criteria for be aa vsriety selection into the breeding procesa at an early stage (personal communicatian, L. Sperling, Oecember 1989.) Working vith bean breeders and fsrmar communities, 'expert aeed selectors' vere selected by their neighbors ,and brought ta the experiment station. There, they vere exposed to the \"logic' af bean selection on-statian while providing iniormation on their own selection procedures on-farm. Over time, the farmar selectora, all of vhom are women, have become a regular part of the bean aelection process. The result is that farmar experience of decades of bean selection is being incorporated into varieties, scientists are altering their field trial arrangements to aceommodate better farmer understanding snd involvement in selection procedures, and there 18 higher probability that the varieties te be releasad vill prove aceeptable to the farmers they are intended to help. As 5perling says. 'rarmer knowledge, eombined vith breeder talents, has a chanca to produce something bettar than each expert's isolated afiocts,' Additionally, Rvandan and ClAT scientists, long conditioned not to view rural women aa 'thinkers' noc 'dec1sion-makars' are gaining a new perspectiva on women farmars who can match the breeders at their own game on their own turf, These examples from CIAT demonstrate tha value of user perspectives and gender sensitivity in tha research programo However, the impact of the understanding derived from attention to gender remain. at the immediate level of the field activities and does not filter up the aystem, nor systematically across the Canter to other programs. This problam is not limited just to gender analysis results. but 15 true for much of the socioeconomic research at CIAT snd at the other lARCs. This fact l. supported by a stetement from ClAT's recent External Program Review that says \"little use has been made of economic research capacity by ClAr administrators for Center-wida managemene decislons.' A This list i8 by no maans complete. It would be useful for tha scientists within the CGIAR System to have an inventory of the work that has been done related to gender in o~der that they could draw upon each others' expariences. It would al so ~~ useful for donors to have a sense of what might hava been triad elsewhere before it i5 repeated in a new set.ting or expanded. Finally, national programs wha are facing growing raquests by donora to include gender issues in their donor-funded work. would benefit from the experiences gained by the IARCs.The review of gender lssues in the CGlAR System reveals that the tapie has been dlfficult for the lARCs. TAC and the CGlAR Secretarlat to address. w~ile considerable york has been accomplished. many of the researchera responsib1e for the effort do not feel they. have succeeded in convincing othar col1eagues of the utility af gender ana1yala. Little of the results from york desling witb gender lssuea has influenced ar informad the research agendas of the Centera. Vhile some difficulties are Center-specific. othera cut across the System and create a general barrier to gender sensitivity and analyais. These cross-cutting lasues are dlscusaed in this sectian, drawing an speelfic centera as examples.There is general misunderstanding af the difference between gender analysis and affirmative actian. Gender analyaia i5 aimed at greater effieiency in productian through the use of analytieal toola designed to better define wao dae. what in the production system and to a1ign research and development priorities, resaurces and participation of users aceordingly. Gender analyais is nat gender speeific and can. and should, be done by men and women. The use of gender analyais as part of the routine of agricultural researeh results in a gender sensltive approach to development as a waole.Affirmative actlon, on the other hand, refers to the staffing of agricultural researcn entities and revising the overwhelmingly male structure to one that involves equitable numbers af men and women at all levels of staffing. Affirmative action is applied to training programs through mechanisms to assure that men and women have equal access and participation.Though ¡ender sensitlve research and development and affirmative action are related, they are not equivalent. Women, just because of their sex, are not gender experts. Gender analyai! 1s leamed, like any other skill. Within many tARCs. however, managers have confused the tvo issusa and have assumed that hiring a few more women seientists will salve the problem of ¡ender issues. While the simple preaence of more women professlonals st a11 1evels in the System may influence some researchera to 'see' more women farmers and decisian-makers in the rural sector, it does not guarantee the use of gender ana1yais. Managers must be careful to elarify, separate and manage them as two issues.As defined earlier. gender ls a social construct and gender analysis draws on social selence toe!a. .~dci3l1y from anthropolo¡y, sociology, geo¡raphy and ecanoeLcs. There are relatively few social leientists in the CGlAR System as a whole. The few that are there, are not uniformly equlpped (trained) to do this type of work. In additian, the diseiplinary bias of the socioeeonomics divlslons or positlons wlth the System ls towards agricultural economics. Agricultural economies training. with few exceptians, does not address gender lssues nor provide training in gender analyals methadologies.-In fact, as others have pointed out, the predominance of agrieultural economista aa the voiee of social seienc, in the Centera and especially in onfarm researeh teams, likely contributes to gender blindness through a reliance on traditional household modela that aasume the farm household functions as a single unit for produetion and eonsumption and that assume that consensus exists among household members on the alloeation of resourees and benefica, and that all household members' interests and problema are identieal (Cloud 1988) • •As Hurphy notes in a recent World Bank guide, '!he contribution of women to development ia often underestimated in economic analyses if these include only formal market activities. because much of the economic contribution of rural women ia done tbrough non-market labor. Yet this contribution ia highly significant altbougb its relative proportion varies between countries. The World Bank Long Term Perspective Study estima tes that women are responsible for about 70% of the food staple production in Africa. Their labor contributien te expert crop and te informal trade is also highly signifieant'(1989:3).To deal with this problem, managers can add, judiciously, genderexperienced scientists from the other social science domains, either on a permanent or project (consultant) basia, to expand the analytical and metbodological base of the social sciences in the Centers and provide the capability to conduct gender analysis. Alternatively, training existing staff and backstopping them with experieneed professionals drawn locally and internationally would be another solution to enhancing the gender anaIyais eapacity. Pooling analytical resources across international and national researeh institutions i8 another route to enhancing capabilities.A key tool for enhancing a gender perspective ls the incorporation of a gender analysis framework in researeh. One of the reasons why frameworks for gender analysis are useful to agricultural researchera 11 that they pose a set of questions that should be asked at every decision point in the process of agricultural research. !he questions --who does what. with what resourees, who has access or control to the resources and benefits. and who should be included in research activities --are always the same. !he answers vary. Analyais of the information generated by the questions becomes part of the overall analysis of the production or food system. Practice with a gender 1 analysis framework will make it part of the normal process of inquiry.3. Laek of contact betveen scientists and women farmara.IARe scientista gene rally have very little contact with women farmara. Even Ni.: .• 2SR or on-farm research programa, it i8 rare to find consistent or extensive contaet with women farmers. therefore litt~e knowledge and understanding ls gained of the differences that might occur between males and females practicing agriculture in the same zone. One raason for the lack of women participants in on-farm research ia a lack of rigor and methodological justification in the selection of farmar cooperators. A recent ISNAR study (Siggs, 1989) pointed out the selection of farmer cooperators i8 the veakest methodological &spect in the rea~ of farmer participation. More oiten than not, faeners are selected fer their conv.nience, not for representativeness. They tend to be wealehier and commercially oriented. They often have very little in common with women farmers in the same area. Poor implementation of the methods for farmer selection prevents adequate inclusion of women farmers and exacerba tes the lack of contact vith scientists despite the growing use of on-farm research approaches.Better application of the toola to build representativeness into the selection of farmers as collaboratora in the research process vill lead to a rational inclusien of women farmers in the process.When a Center is headquartered in an are a where women either historically have had a smaller role in the production of the commodities within the mandate of the Center, or where women are believed to playa amall role in agriculture, the beliefs and understanding of the Center stafi conceming gender roles in production are greatly influenced by the immediate surroundings. Por example, the location of lITA in a region of Nigeria where WQmen are not very involved traditionally in preduction activities has caused or reinforced the belief that vomen in general are not involved in agriculture. (personal communicatien, A. Goldman, January 1990.)In the north of Nigeria women are not even involved in marketing activities. Field exposure there has served to reinforce a lack of attention to the issue sinee it simply doesn't visually hit researchers over the head. Likewise, the loeation of CIHHYT in an area of Mexico typified historieally by men taking major responsibility for field tasks in agriculture has contribQted to a similar bias (personal communicationf J. Camey, February 1990.) This kind of 'conventional visdo=' can serve as blinders to gender differences, even when one is confronted vieh them, face to face. Camey explains that in Mexico, women are becoming major decision-makers in agricultural production fer maize and wheat. In the past, they vere noto Even though migration to ehe U.S. on a seasonal basis was alvays an economic strategy used by men to augment household income, they vere able to be ae home to perform the major agricultural tasks. Now that aeasonal migration ia 111egal, men can no longer return to perform these tasks and women must bear ehe bQrden of ehe agricultural work. Usually ehey use remittances from ehe men to purchase labor in the form of mechanizstion. Bouad by their beliefs in the aystem 'the way lt vas,' the research community has not perceived these changes in the production system &ud nor questioned whether lt makes a difference. In the definition of problema &ud design of r.~• ~ology, the mele is still considereu as the aead of the household &ud key aecision.maker.In the Mexican situation above, if researchera first asked who doas what in the local production system. thay would discover the changes in gandar roles brought on by larger politicsl &ud social changes. They could then adjust researeh directions and priorities accordingly. lf they don't ask ehe 30 • ¡ ., question, then they remain blinded by their beliefs in the way the system usad to be instead of how it really 15. 5. Lack of senior scientist involvement in gender issues.Research relating to gender iasues i3 often assigned to or undertaken by junior staff, the post doc'!, junior seientists, research aasociates, and research aasistanta. Because vomen haye be en the primary actors in dealing ,.with gender iaaues and beeause women are gene rally within the Centera in more junior positiona, the lack of senior status and involvement has created a type of \"second elass standard' for gander issuas vork. This has mada it diffieult for those condueting gander analyaia to make their results heard within the Center and within the CGlAR System. Additionally, most of the attention to gender is by social scientists, who al SO generally have less status and seniority within agricultural research.• Not only does this deafen the larger research effort to gender analysis, but also there i8 a lack of guidance and mentoring for the seientists and researchers who do engage in gender analysia. While there are gendersensitive male seientists within the Syatem, few apparently are willing to be vocal in public on the subjeet. Often this ia a case of simply lacking experience in artieulating gender issues within the agricultural research framework. For othera, there la a definite perceived social and even professional risk in standing up for gender amongst tbeir peers. Aa long as the 'culture\" of the Centera make it risky to voice gender issues. the effective lncorporation of gender analysis in research is unlikely.The riak pereeived in voicing gender eoncerns i9 linked to the connection of gender isaues to the social seienees, and in most cases, to onfarm research. Gender ia embedded in a whole approach to eondueting agricultural research that ia still not well accepted aeross all seetors of the field. Resistance to doing research with direet farmer involvement ia still SO strong that proponents often fear to eomplicate the issue further by adding the gender perspective. Thua, many of the more gender-sensitive male seientists in the System are reluetant to push the issue since they are already fighting a difficult battle just to get any farmers at all involved in the process. 6. Gender viewed as the responsibility of NARS not lARCs.As mentioned earlier in the paper, gender issues and analysis, and indeed any reaeareh direetly involving farmera, is viewed by many within ehe CGIAR System aa the responsibility of NARS not the lARCs. While it is true that the adaptive stage of the research process should be aquarely in the domain of the national programs, the technical results from strategie and particularly from applied resear~:, ;~,~ot be generated in isolation from the realities of farmer produetion aystems. There ia a crucial need to ~a1 •. tain a contact with farmers to assure relevancy. ~f this contact is lost or mediated only througb several layera of researchers. the technology released by the System may be inappropriate, or vorae, miss the target entirely. The exact balance of farmer and user contact neeessary to research dependa on the problem being addreased and the skills of the human resources involved.Gender iuues IllUst be articulated in the for=lation of t .. d researeh problem as well as the formatting of its solutio~. For some problema, gender, as well as other soe:io•economic variables, are meot iasues in the sDlution procesa. Hawaver, for the majority of problema facing developing e:ountry disadvantaged farmers, the socioeeonomie: variables are part and parcel of the problem and we cannot afford ta overlook ehem.A related element to thia is the.fact that ehe CGIAR Centers are the aaurce of research methodology for many NARS researchera. Hany laok ta the Centers for training and far the latest innovations in agricultural research. the absenee Df gender perspectives, senaitivity and methads Df study in the training programa offered by the CGIAR 5ystam perpetua tes the invisibility of women as a client group far IARC/NARS tachnalagy.7. Gender issues as a apecial project.Gender related projects and programa, the few that exist, are underfunded, and/ar rely on apecial funding. they tend not to be eore funded. this makes tham very vulnerable to funding cutoffs. It also tends to iso late the issue as a \"spee:ial topic\" rather than integrating the con~ent and methods thraughout the programo Special 'women's projects\", l!ke those at lRAI and UTA, can sometimes backfire in the long runo they serve to bring womeri into the aystem and often to produce relevant research results, as long as the apeeial funds lasto When the funding or the project terminates, there are no meehanisms in place to assure continuity in funding or direetion. there needs to be far greatar \"mainstreaming' of the effores dealing with gender i9sue8. Mainstreaming will also help to legitimize ehe work af the seientists who are already candueting work on the subject. a. Lack of mechanisms ta implement affirmative ae:tion goals.While correeting the eurrent gender 1mbalance in the staffing pattems and the training courses af the CGIAR System will not automatieally aehieve gender sensitivity, having more women professionals in the 5ystem i9 a related concem and a stated goal of many IARe directora. Howevar, managers camplain that they do not get enough women applicants for staff positions. Most agree vith Richard Sawyer's comment at the 1987 ICY seminar. that it i9 important not to sacrifice quality in favor of balancing numbers. While this i8 trua, it may be that the Canters have not beeo pro.active enough in eheir searches. The men who currently dominate the staffs af the Centers, have contact in the professional world and in their disciplinary soeieties primarily with ather meno Overtime this may change. As mare women meve into the system, mare WOmen will gain aecess and interest through their presenee. Inereasing numbers of women spee;alizing in agrieultural research with international interests vill enhwnc. che pool of human resources lor future staffing.In terma af •sining at the Centers, managers face a different problem. Much of the respocs_bility fór selecting trainees lor training coursss is in the hands of national program leader!. Center! are reluctant to make demands for specifie kinds of participants with regard to gender. However, criter1a Training managers should explore whether criteria for balancing male and female participants would really cause problema st the NARS level. le might require more time in negotiation and diseussion about participants and, for this, training managers could approaeh the issue with NARS leadera on an informal basis. In other cases, it may be useful to substitute field. experienee for formal educstion in the requirements for admission to trai_ing in order to sllow women greater access to technical training, even when the educational system has previously biased their aequisition of basic formal disciplinary training. Sometimes. the barrier i9 simply taking ehe first step. In the short run, quota systems or similar mechanisms may be necessary. However, if regional lARC staff and eollaborating national program leaders can be sen9itized to the issue, then it is likely that targets for increasing women's participation in training will be achieved.Monitoring the progresa of the CGlAR System in incIuding women as staff and trainees was called for in several of the sets of recommendations from the series of conferences summarized earIier in this paper. It i9 difficult to assess the degree of compliance with this requeat sinee the public documents of the Centers (the annual reports in particular) still do not report any gander disaggregated staffing or training information. Even discussion in several reports and planning documenta from Centera, and from the COlAR Secretariat of critical human resource deficiencies in Africa. as a special topie. did not mention women professionals as an overlooked or scarce resouree. Even though the statistic! on the critical role women playas the predominant food crop farmers in Africa are well.known and cited almost routinely in intemational circles, there is little or no linking of women farmers to the need for women professionals within the agricultural research and development ranks.The COlAR Secretariat has taken some steps to implement changes in response to this recommendation in the management reviews of the Centers. Looking at the three concluded in the last sl% menths, it ia worthwhile considering the terms of reference for the task and the results in the review reports.In the CIP EMR (1989) the question that focused on gender/women in the list of questions in the management review terms of refarence was found under human resources. '#7. Ooes CIP actively promete recruitment. retention and career development of women? Are there barriers to women's advancement in the center?\"The response to this question by the EMR team was found on ~. ~8 of the report.'CIP has around 138 women emp10yees of whom five are intemationa1 scientists and a further five are postdoctorals. CIP has no quota for women and doea not consciously monitor their number. CIP has so admirable record in this area. CIP women have ehaired the Board and its 33 , proje~ts in remote areas. T~}re are advaneement of women ando i~ :erms p tbere is equality of opportunity.') diseernable ohstaeles to the leleetion and work opportunities.To test tae validity of this assessment. the CIP professional staff were disaggregated by génder using tbe staff listings in the 1988 annual reporto the same year as ehe management review (see belaw). As can be seen, among senior managemant, women enly appear on. the Board. This means that in terms of day-to-day management snd scientific leadership, women are absent. Among the research seientists (headquarters and regional) with a Ph.D. only 8.5% are women (5 out of 59). Among the other researeh seientists. 19% (2 out of 21) are women. While these numbers have ineraased sinee 1983. they do not substantiate the assessment by the EMIt team of 'no discernable obstaeles ,. or having 'equality of opportunity'. Among the seientifie assistants. 35% are women and in several departments. the numbers of women assistants is nearly half; in two departments (social seienee and training/communieations) women number equal to men or more. In terms of total numbers. however. tbere are 48 women (or 24%) and 149 meno These numbers differ from those quoted from ehe EMIt. It seems likely that secretarial staff may have been inadvertently included in the total number of women staff counted by the EMR. In the CIAT EPR (1989), within the terma of referenca for the review, fallowing question vas ineluded, '8. Is CIAT giving sufficient eonsidetation in planning reseateh and related activities to the needs of women and ta the implication of the applieation of resaareh results fot women?\"In the review document producad by the program evaluation team, undet the saction \"Target groups and gendar issues\" no further mention of the word \"gender\" is used.While the \"equity orientation\" of CIAT in terms of limited resource farmers snd consumers i9 applauded, no eoneem i8 raised over lack of gender disaggregation to see if there is any differentiation among this group, In addition to noting that the bean farmers in East Africa are women, the only further note on gender i8 at end of the section wbere it states: \"At the other end of the spectrum. st the micro-level, the Farmer Participstory Research Projeet ia seeking vaya to draw men and women into the research process in their capacities as producers, procesaors and consumerl,\"In the CIAT EMR (1989) the gender-apecific queation posed in the terms of reference was the same posad to CIP: \"7, Does the center actively promete recruitment, retention and career development of women1 Are there barriera to women's advancement in the center?\" Answars to question are hard to find. On p.39 it states:• More aggresaive a9sistance with spousal employment may a1so ba warranted, particular1y if CIAT i9 serious about improving the gender balanca; professional woman a!most invariably have professional spouaes. Thare ia already a new poliey permitting CIAT employment of spouses in outreach programa under specified conditions. This issua i9 endemic to al1 CGIAR centera and a concerted collaborativa affort to idantify solutions would probably be useful,'The report also notes that at CIAT intemationally recruited staff includes 97 man and 11 women (10.2%). Thera is no breakdown by gender for programa nor by discipline in the rev!ew., Leoking finally at the lITA review, questions about women were included in the ter=s of reference for both the EPa and the EMR. In the EPa, lt asked: 'What mechanlsms does the Centre have to ensure equal recognltion of ehe role of men and women in agricultural research and acceas to its products1'This question was placed in the general list of review questions. In ehese addressed specifically to lITA. there vas no further mention of women nor gender. In the EPa report (1990. p. 61) it states. 'The Instltute i5 also vorking to ensure that women vill soon fill at least 30% of training opportllOities.' On p. 66 it adds the following clarification, 'Records ovar the past four yeara shOY tha: only 6.8: oE African trainees st lITA vere vomen. Given the important role plsyed by 'JOmen in Africsn agriculture. this participation ls obviously inadequate, lITA 18 nov developing an afflrmative action programme to identify snd encourage vomen to apply for training opportllOities at the Institute. In 1989. 22% of the PhD and 23% of ehe MSc graduate students vere women, while ln group courses. the women represented l2% of the total particlpants. In 1985. lITA received a grant from the Ford Foundation to cover the expenses for flve female MSc students and 34 vomen on short training courses. A second proposal seeking financial support for ten female agricultural professional (MSc. and PhD.) has just been approved Eor fllOding, The lITA objective is to have vomen fill at least 30% of the openings in education and training at lITA. Oespite substantial improvements since 1986, that earget remains elusive, and will remain so unIese financial support for ehe yollOg dependents of female students 15 provided. 'In ehe lITA EMR (1990) llOder human resources the teons af reference included the same questions posed to CIP and CIAT: \"#1. Ooes lITA actively promote recrui~ent. retention and career development of women1 Are there barriers to women's advancament L~ the eenter?In the report itsalf, on p. 39, the response ia • rhe ratio af male ta female internatianal staff ia about 8:1. The ratio has shown slight improvement in recen~ years. Efforts to hire mora femala staff shauld continue, \" For all of the other indieators on human resources. there are tables with information, but not for gender. There is no infor=ation about gender disparity or problep~ with recruitment, retention snd career development. Thera ~s nv information on any measures to attract women nor issues of tu~_over. There la no informatlon on nationally hired staff regarding gen.-~, sector or discipline. In som, t~e answer ta the quest!on by the evaluatlan ~eam ia incomplete. rhe same can be said for the other reviews. Though it ia necessary to • J-, .include the question in the terma of reference for the EMRs and the EPRs, and the CGlAR and TAC are to be commended o~ taking this initiative, having the question is not sufficient. TAC and the CGlAR will have to monitor whether the review teams address the question and how well they can assess a response. Obviously, there are some errora in the CIP review reporto For all three of the examples, the answera for the questions are very incomplete. Rectifying this will take some thought and attention .. It is not sufficient just to be sure a woman is on the review teams. 59me of these teams did include women. One had two women. It is necessary that the Centers themselves take the iasue seriously and prepare for the review by disaggregating their staff and training participants by gender. This will enable the CGlAR to monitor progress in reaching gender balance over time and allow reviewers easier access to the necessary information to make an assessment.Restrictions on the numbers of people on review teams and the variety of qualifications that must be represented will limit the extent to which gender specialists can be placed on the teams for both EMRs and EPRs. For the latter, however, given the move to more strategic EPRs, greater attention will be paid to linkages with the national systems and their capacity to collaborate as strong partners with the centers. For this assessment it is imperative to have a member on the panel who is highly sensitive to the issue of NARS linkages with their resource poor clients, and not least to the potential impact of technologies on gender balance in the farm household.The gender information gap. 'While there is a virtual explosion of literature today on gender issues in all aspects of development, this literature does not seem to come in contact with the majority of Center staff. Part of the reason is that the scientists themselves are fairly specialized by disciplinary interests and by their assignment to specific tasks. Their fieldwork and travel schedules do not often allow exploration of related research fields, even if they have the interest. Access to literature is also a problem since the Center libraries are also focused to their specific mandates. It is not feasible for the Centera to invest in expanding their collections to include the whole gender literature, but selective inclusion of relevant material s would be an improvement. Information specialists could be another resource on this topic by learning about and providing access to literature sources on gender issue5 at local and international levels.Presentation of the information in the CGIAR 5ystem publications could a150 be improved. Though there is substantial use of pictures showing women as farmers and consumers in the Center documents, few pictures portray women as scientists, collaborators in research or as significant numbers within training courses. Again, referring to the example that the Centers set in __ \"drnational agriculture, improvements could be made in the visual presentation of t~e importance of men and women in the work of the System.The CGlAR 5ystem is not lacking in recommendations regarding gender issues. Rather, the problem lies in identifying actions to implement the recommendations already mada. !bis sectipn outlines five next steps to alleviate the diffieulties the System has in dealing with gender.Step l. Donors to ehe CGIAR System must exert pressure upon the system to adope an explieit gender perspective and incorporate ¡ender analysia in the research agenda. !his pressure cannot be limited to an annual call for ad hoc reportin¡ st the ICV. Mauy, perhaps mqst, of the major donors to the CGIAR System have already implemented ¡ender or VID policies that are routinely applied to other development efforts. Donors must reconsider these policies and devise appropriate mean. to apply them to the CGIAR System.Step 2. TAC and the CGIAR have taken a eritical first step by adding questions on women and ¡ender issues to the terma of reference for the regular review proceas of the Centera (the EMR and the EPa). However, this was not suffieient. leview eeams must be instructed (trained or advisedl on how to look for information to answer these questions. !hey must be encouraged to address al1 of the questions, not just the part on 'how many women are employed.' !his means lookin¡ at two aspects of ¡ender:-!he first ia the use of gender as an analytical tool in the description of problems, the design and testing of new technology and in the examination of impact on clients and beneficiaries. In this sense, ¡ender is a part of the research process and evaluators must look for its appropriate application.-!he 'acend aspeet daals with staffing. leview teams must look at the gender of the staff of ehe Canters to see the extent to whicb women are present at eaeb level and within tbe'various programa.Centers themselves sbould assist the review teams in tbis process by providing annually a gender disaggregated aecounting of staffing at all levels, by eovering pragmatic themes and summarizin¡ ¡ender-related resesreh and results. Between the regular reviews, Center progresa en these issues can be monitored by reviewing annual reports, researeb reports, planning documenta, snd ather aecounts of Center activities.Step 3. rf Centers are ta take gender issues seriously and incorparate ¡ender analysis into relevant parts of tbeir research and programming, Centar staff need to leam how to do this. It is clear from ehe review of the Center's experience to date that only a very few seientists, lar¡ely social scientists -use gander analysi. as a tool in tbeir work. !hose who do, cama te the Centers with these skills leamed alsewbere. Despite ehe literature cn gander issues from within and witbout, the Centers have not adapted their methods ta include ¡ander analysis, in their work. Simplv r•• A ' 19 ar haaring about ¡ender iasues ia not sufficient to make a change in the way reseerch 18 done. ~at i~ needed te eneourage this changa is treining.Trsining needs to be earried out at two levels: for those currently being trained by the Centers snd for those witbin the Centera tbemselves. Takin¡ ehe first level, ehe curriculum of the training offered by ehe Centera for I • • national program researchers and practitieners neede to be-reviewed and revised fer gender contento !his doea npt mean the creation of a special course on gender, but rather the careful incorporation of gender issues and methods within ezisting. appropriate courses. Obviously, there is no need fer gender content in the courses dealing with such specialized technology as virus testing procedures. however. courses dealing with user or clientoriented research methods, such as process~g and storage systems, smallscale machinery, pest-management, seed,management and on-farm research in general can be enhanced with the inclusion of gender issues and methods. The CIMMYT example from East Africa described earlier or the work done at IiRI to revise the farming systems course curriculum (A. Frio. personal communication. March 1990) are useful modela tor other Centera. In each case, the course was not necessarily expanded, but altemate material s and ezereises were included that draw participants attention to male and female roles in farming and gender analysis toola for technology design and teating. Relevant training material s and literature do already exist for these purposes. !he necessary next step is their incorpcration threugh the normal channels cf training currículum review and revision.Trainíng at the second level -among the Center staff itself -ls also critIcal. VDile it is not necessary for every Center staff scientist or research assistant to be an expert in gender analysis. it is important that the Center as a whole adopt a positive attitude towards gender. Providing training of al1 staff. from top to bottom is a significant step towards revising the gender bias that exista in agricultural research institutions -Centera included -and ereating a climate in which gender issuea can be dealt with a ratienal analytical level. rather than through the haze of misperceptions and subjective prejudice. Sensltization and avareness. This ia a 'starter' course and it i8 targeted at the entire staff. !he purpose is general awareness and understanding of the difference between sex and gender, the reasons why gender issues are important in agricultural research, and the framework and basic tools used in gender analysis. !he training vill give Center staff a commOn set of terms and definitions -a vocabulary to use in discussing gender issues and anaIysis. !his vill help to correct the many mi.cenceptions and confusions that exist between gender analysis and affirmative action, respectively the efficiency and equity aspects of gender understanding .!he content for a Type 1 course can be drawn from existing gender training materials (s~e ___ ~xamples Overholt. et al. 1985); Feldstein et al. 1989;Feldste!n and Poats 1990) but ~ould be complemented with examples from the commodities and areas of cone~m'for each center.. The course should contain handa-on exereises to give eaeh participant a chane e to handle gender data and experiment with analya!a and interpretation. Practical ezercisea in applying the lessons of the course to staff member own job responsibílities ahould be the final part of the course.Type I training should be eondueted First among all senior management and leaders of eaeh Center. There should be no exeeptions. Training must start st the top to set an example that the issues are important to the Center as a whole. Prom the top, the training should be implemented in groups of 25-30, mixing senior seientists snd research stsff in interdisciplinary fashion.It i8 suggested that the trainer •• for this course be drawn from outside the Center in order that all member of each Center can participate equally. However. the trainers should be familiar with the Centers and their activities. It might be pos.ible for existing gender-experieneed researchers from other Centers to participate as trainers or resouree persona.Experienee in conducting this sama type of training in a vide range of institutions for similar purposea strongly luggeata that a minimum of one-and-one-half days should be allocated for the training seasion. To conserve on trainer costs. it 1a wise to schedule a series of courses in a row st a time when staff are gathered se headquarters. Pollow-up monitoring se si: snd 12 months Should be designed to elicit impact on staff members work .. Hany Centers are presently undergoing a number of other staff training programs dealing with management, research planning. resource allocation. etc. Gender i9 susceptible to •short shrifting• in the face of these perceived priorities. Donors. CGIAR, TAC and Center Directors viII have to determine just where their commitment lies on user issues as a Whole, and gender spe~ifically, and then allo~ate the neceslary resources to get the Job done.Type 2.Gender Analysis Methode. Following Type 1 training, those persona with researeh responsibilities that draw them into close contact with techuelogy users, should be selected for a more thorough training in gender analysis methods. Gender-experienced eenter staff can be valuable resource persons and facilitators far such training, or, depending on individual capabilities, trainera themselves. This training ceurse would be more explicitly focused on data gathering and analysis methodologies, interpretation skills, and field practice. Field practicum work i8 sn essentisl part of such a course, because it provides the necelsary experience in daing researen through a new gender perspectiva.The cantent of the caurse is similar to the gender eantent described aboye under level one. Hawever. since the researchera participating would already be experienced in the other content areas, ehe gender mathods alone would be the focua. Between three and five dayl il usually needed for such training in order to aecommodate the field exerci~es.In~luding researeh collaborators from proje~ta with NARS may he an effeetive mechanism ta pr~te a team approach to addrelsing gender-issues L~ new or on-going projec~~. Type 2 courses can be designed sctually to initiate field or project york to include ¡ender issues. In eSlence, the practieum launches participants in applying gender toola and using the ¡ender analysis framework en an actual research problem. Tying training to such work can ennance both the relevance and speed with which the toola hecome part of the The content of a Type 3 course snould be-focused on practice vith a variety of training materials that already exist that have been useful in teaching gender analysia tools to reaearchers and development workera in other settings. Trainera should a1so be exposed to nev types of training material s and approaches tnat nave been particularly effective in dealing with gender issues that might not already be in their particular repertoire of training toals. Finally, trainers should be given practice and guidance in develaping new material s specific ta tneir technical mandates for teaching gender issues in their awn centers.The lengtn of time far this type af training depends on the existing skills of the trainers and the number of people in tne course. The important thing ia to give the trainer-participants enough time to practice training on gender issues and in designing gender components for other training courses so that they viII be able to carry this york on vithin the Centera. Well qualified and experienced trainers who have done gender training themselves should be 80ught as the facilitators for tnis course. The experienced trainera can serve as mentors to tne trainer-participants as they begin training in their respective Centera.Taken together, the three types of training viII develop the capacity of the Centers to undertake research with a ¡ender perspective and to sustain that perspective vith new members of their own staff and among tne trainees from national programa.Stap.. Centers should use existing networks such as those aIready established for collaborative activity on commodity researen to develap common themes and research methodologies for dealing with gender issues. There are several advantages of doing this. First, networks bring a vitality to researeh by engaging a number of researchers in different socioeconomie and agroecological settings to focus attention on similar issues and using similar metnodological approaches. For gender analyaie, tne netvorkin¡ approach will bring greatar innovation to the methodologies for ¡ender analysis as well as a range of examples that demonstrate why and how gender sensitive research can make a difference to the development and adopti~n .~ ~dchnology.The networking approach applied to ¡ender iS$ue$ vill also help to reinforce the linkage between the LARCs and the NARS. PIacing gender iasues and analyaia within a network helpa to integrate the ¡ender perspective into tne larger research framework •Step~.!he CGIAR sha~ld develap a atrategy paper far the general implementatian af existing recommendatio~a. !hese sno~ld be fallowed by Center-specific strategy atatements. Each Ceneer ultimately needa to develop and ¡ain eonsenaus en Buen a seatement, Buen as IAlI's, and translate that into explieit previsions in the workplan and the allacatien af resaurees.!hese five stepa vill enhenee the capacity aE the Centers, and the CGIAR system as a whale, ta emplay ¡ender enalyaia as a normal. pragmatie vay ta conduct ¡ood agricultural research end to develap useful technolagies far rescurce poor farmera. ","tokenCount":"18060"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0890697485.json b/data/part_2/0890697485.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4c20409e098663b83fa582ae21ea7d8e5d620914 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0890697485.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a96f42ed32c97bcd529252a6619ad197","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/ac16ea3f-5b4a-41a1-a2e2-b1047ebc9c5b/content","id":"-1830203259"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"ca5aaad9-264e-48c9-b439-9414734febe3","pagecount":"2","content":"This brief summarizes fi ndings from an assessment of young people's perceptions of and participation in agriculture in Mozambique. In order to understand young people's interest and perspectives as they relate to the agricultural sector, we examined young women and men's perceptions of the following themes: (i) sustainability of farming as a livelihood; (ii) existing opportunities for young people in the agricultural sector; (iii) access to land, other farm inputs and outputTransporting maize harvest, Tete province, Mozambique. Photo: CIMMYT/Tsedeke Abate.• Regardless of the village of residency, both young men and young women showed positive attitudes towards farming. Farming is a source of food and income for rural households.• Youth receive land from their parents, when they marry. In patrilineal communities of Macate, the new couple receives land to farm from the husband's parents at the time when the young wife moves to her husband's home. In matrilineal communities in Angonia, when a woman marries she receives land from her parents for her to farm with her husband.• Youth in rural Mozambique see themselves as farmers for the rest of their lives. There is lack of alternative employment and economic opportunities outside agriculture in rural areas; therefore, youth fi nd agriculture to be their only option. markets for their farm produce; (iv) access to knowledge, skills and information; (v) youth engagement in forums for youth dialogue; and (vi) access to green jobs that contribute to environmental conservation and other economic activities outside agriculture. The study was conducted in six villages of Macate and Angonia districts, in central Mozambique. A total of seven focus group discussions were held with a total of 85 participants (39 males and 46 females).• Although youth are aware of employment opportunities in urban areas, of the 85 study participants only one male youth from Macate district revealed plans to move to urban areas in search of employment and stop farming.• Youth are involved in small business. More female youth are involved in trading crops and fruits, while male youth sell food stu (oil, sugar, salt). For youth, small business is temporary, not stable, and not profi table. Thus, the youth tend to put farming activities as a fi rst priority at most times and small businesses are considered a secondary priority.• Youth face many challenges in farming that hinder them from moving from subsistence to more profi table agriculture. However, as noted by Ripoll et al. (2017), a number of these challenges are not specifi c to youth, but rather of general structural character. Some of the challenges that were noted by young women and men in this study include: (i) Lack of access to fi nancial services necessary to invest in improved inputs, labor, and machinery; ii) Problems in obtaining good returns from trading crops due to price fl uctuations and lack of reliable markets; (iii) Lack of access to knowledge, skills, and information about farming; and (iv) Young women face several genderrelated barriers, e.g. in relation to voicing their concerns and participation in meetings.• Including young women and men farmers in the targeting of interventions related to information about and access to good quality seeds, as well as to with fi nancing or price discounts for fertilizer, seeds and herbicide purchase.• Strengthening young women's and men's membership in producers' groups, to help them learn from, and address input-as well as output market challenges together with other farmers (FAO, 2012). This could also facilitate young farmers' exposure to extension information and improved agricultural technologies.• Evaluate experiences with emerging youth-focused fi nancing products to build evidence. A relevant example can be found in Uganda, where youthdedicated products have started to be o ered, through a partnership between the Development Finance Company of Uganda (DFCU) Bank, Stanbic Bank and Centenary Bank with the Government of Uganda and its Youth Venture Capital Fund (FAO, CTA and IFAD, 2014).• Take advantage of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) i.e., mobile phones, internet services, radio, among others, to reach out specifi cally to rural youth and provide them with information that will enhance their agricultural knowledge, business skills and production capability.","tokenCount":"679"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0901356806.json b/data/part_2/0901356806.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..29202e48a2b428f7fe9d4908330f0069bb75bfe3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0901356806.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"8d42116280f76f594bb058131b1058b9","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/ad022220-cadf-4e6a-bc1f-2b94c88f4642/retrieve","id":"1630975752"},"keywords":["Homem","B. G.","de Lima","I. B. G.","Spasiani","P. P.","Guimarães","B. C.","Guimarães","G. D.","Bernardes","T. F.","... & Casagrande","D. R. (2021). Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems","121(2)","167-190. Subbarao","G. V.","Rondon","M.","Ito","O.","Ishikawa","T.","Rao","I. M.","Nakahara","K.","... & Berry","W. L. (2007). Plant and Soil","294","5-18"],"sieverID":"8fc5edf3-f24b-4d8b-a1f7-c871711f7bf9","pagecount":"1","content":"Unfertilized grass monocultures with extensive grazing management dominate pastures in Colombia's Caquetá region. These practices contribute to significant nutrient losses, particularly nitrogen (N).Pasture's N supply could be improved by the inclusion of legumes in pastures (Homem et al. 2021, Thomas, 1992) or grasses with capacity of biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) (Subbarao et al., 2013).Understanding soil N cycling is key to develop strategies that improve sustainability of Amazon pastures' management.• Soils under U. humidicola pastures exhibited 80% lower gross nitrification rates than U. brizantha, likely due to the capacity of biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) (Subbarao et al., 2009).• Net nitrification was higher in grass-legume pastures due to lower NO 3 immobilization compared to grass-alone pastures.4. Results• Uh: Urochloa humidicola grass alone (6) and grass-legume (6)• Ud: Urochloa decumbens grass alone (3) and grass-legume (3)• Ub: Urochloa brizantha grass alone (3) and grass-legume (3) BNI capacity Uh > Ud > Ub (Subbarao et al., 2007) Methods:• Topsoil sampling (0-20 cm), sieved at 4 mm and pre-incubated.• Soil incubation at 25°C at 60% of soil water-holding capacity (96 h after 15 N labelling of NH 4 + and NO 3 pools).• 15 N pool dilution method for gross N fluxes determination (Di et al., 2000). ","tokenCount":"202"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0915141352.json b/data/part_2/0915141352.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4824cfb226b6a27e41f3afe756b53b1ab2148a72 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0915141352.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b6609dd0a27b71603c85daa11fcc87f7","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/be1bff5b-33ef-438f-8a74-db87405912aa/retrieve","id":"174006330"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"1029c011-67aa-4005-9bc5-019e425f064c","pagecount":"8","content":"The CGIAR Research Programme on Climate Change Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) is co-constructing a strategy for Climate Change Communication and Social Learning (CCSL). Not to be confused with the general CCAFS Communication Strategy for disseminating materials and raising profile etc, CCSL is about an attempt to fundamentally change how CGIAR scientists and the communities they work with and for, communicate their shared knowledge and experience and learn together. It is about ensuring a relevant and dynamic transformative change that truly recognises the needs of communities facing the harsh realities of climate change today not just in 50 years time.To embrace a social learning methodology right from the start the CCAFS team has been working with a community of people working in communications, participatory methodologies, knowledge management and social learning to think together about the implications of such a strategy for CGIAR and how CCAFS might begin to take this forward. This community will grow and expand as new people are introduced to the programme.The first step in the CCSL coconstruction process was a call for proposals to develop a discussion paper designed to catalyse a dialogue with an initial group of people. Drafted by IDS and IIED this paper did four things: gave a background to the theory of climate change communication and social learning, presented findings from a survey and case studies of climate change communication initiatives and presented the idea of single, double and triple loop learning 1 . It also looked at some of the implications of adopting such an approach within a large entity like the CGIAR. Participants at the first workshop in Addis were tasked with thinking through the implications of a triple loop learning approach for a CCAFS climate change communication and social learning strategy. Since the workshop, CCAFS has facilitated the start of a community of practice or Sandbox (www.yammer.com/ccsl), and innovation funds for exploring ideas and initiatives in pursuit of understanding how social learning works and will be finding further opportunities for 1 Social Learning is defined in a number of ways by different people. Perhaps for this brief introduction Devaux's definition (Feb 2009) \"-social learning brings about a shift from \"multiple cognition\" to \"collective cognition\". Individuals involved in social learning processes begin with quite different perceptions of their current situation and the potential for change; as they interact, they develop common, shared perspectives, insights and values\" helps to situate the principle outcomes of good social learning. The action of learning is nicely summarised in the Triple Loop Learning concept (Armitage 2008) that shows that true social learning is a process of looped interactions from action to reflection leading to changed behaviours in new actions. This concept leaves out the nuance of power relations and social differentiation which true social learning processes need to recognise but it demonstrates the importance of an iterative process to learning. This synthesis paper presents five key change areas deemed critical by the participants of the Addis Workshop to inculcate a process of change in working with communities and partners. These change areas are those key areas where the group felt that CCAFS needed to devote attention if it was to take this challenge seriously. Further research commissioned by CCAFS has tasked IDS and IIED to review the literature of others' experience of social learning and what the critical success factors are. We are looking forward to seeing where there is overlap or difference with the change areas identified at the workshop. An early finding suggests the importance of well facilitated and structured processes, although this was not defined as a key change area in our meeting it is an implicit part of understanding what the preconditions are for a good social learning process and this is part of all the key change areas.Below, there is a template for defining each change area, saying why the group in Addis felt it important for social learning and the CCAFS strategy as well as a description of the work to be one next as proposed by participants. The five areas, with no significance in the order:1. Documentation 2. Social Learning within CCAFS 3. Endogenous Social Learning 4. Social DifferentiationWorking groups at the workshop identified both the change areas and the project activity for each change area. The material below comes from the presentations of each of the working groups exploring this at the workshop.This change area was about making sure we really analyse and test social learning as a tool, that we really understand what it is, how it works and can cite good examples of where it has worked, where it has not worked and what the different levels of impact might be in certain situations. This learning needs to be documented and shared with the research and policy communities. We need to communicate with confidence and with good evidence before we can have any certainty that this kind of approach will be adopted and that it adds value both for those engaged in the process and those who need to demonstrate impact. Documentation can include research and literature reviews that already include experience and evidence of social learning as well as documenting new case studies and pilot studies.One of the challenges is to make sure that social learning is really understood and recognisable as a methodology and not just as a new and more fashionable term for participation, advocacy or organisational learning. The evidence suggests that social learning is a particular methodology -with a wider remit than participation -that looks more closely at the relative value of knowledge, how it is perceived and used in a collective response to a challenge and how to ensure that all participants are learning. The significance of \"triple loop\" learning where a community changes collective behaviour together by learning and acting together presents a subtle nuance. To understand this fully will be helped greatly with good documentation of examples and the use of this methodology when dealing with particularly complex or \"wicked\" problems will be vital.The number and range of projects that the CGIAR science community is involved with is enormous and projects vary from large global studies with very long timeframes to more local community-based projects where communities are dealing with daily challenges. Transforming learning approaches in this environment is extremely challenging and will require top level buy-in as well as creative ways to get buy-in with the scientific community. Good documentation, an archive of examples and approaches provides the substrates from which new approaches and ways of working can germinate.Also the CGIAR community can provide a testing ground for analysing, monitoring and documenting new ways of working. Those researchers who are prepared to design projects using social learning methodology can also document their experience to be shared. Indeed many CGIAR projects are already demonstrating that considerable thought goes into the design of project to ensure wide participation and shared learning. A glossary of CGIAR terminology for these activities would help in developing a shared internal discourse.It was recommended that this change area look at building an Inventory of Cases looking at testing Social Learning as a model. Selecting the case studies to work with will be the role of CCAFS -and their partners. CCAFS is also extremely well -positioned to support some of the funding and logistics, supporting the networking and dissemination of ideas and to help build and support the development of a growing body of work, a global public good. A budget of $200,000 was suggested.Where we are now:It is clear that a universally recognised methodology for evaluating the impact of social learning tools and approaches would help to consolidate the learning from this process. The second studythe Impact Assessment -being carried out by IDS and IIED is beginning to see key themes emerging for key success factors. Developing a framework from this work could be a vital next step.Build the Inventory of Cases• Determine process for submitting proposals to the Innovation Fund or to CCAFS.• Put forward proposals for good case studies to add to the inventory.• Establish selection criteria by which to choose cases to study.• Identification of a multi-disciplinary team to work on the case studies.• Establish a methodology with which to analyse the case studies.• Identify key indicators for success with which to evaluate the case studies.• Write up and share findings. A social learning approach adopted and promoted by CCAFS within the CGIAR system is aiming to achieve a significant step change, championed by the work of CCAFS and others in CGIAR who are.This change area is all about working to promote a behaviour change within the CGIAR system -this is a big challenge and at the heart of it is how to support or incentivise an institutional change process. Much discussion was held around the role of CCAFS as a partner in a social learning environment and the recognition that the CGIAR centres combine a global and local engagement. It was felt important that the CCAFS CCSL recognises where CCAFS can contribute added value and where it needs new kind of partnerships to make this happen. The way the CGIAR is funded, organised and researchers incentivised means that a social learning methodology would appear carry high transaction costs in terms of time let alone the challenge of bringing together different kinds of knowledge to contribute to a shared learning outcome however, the potential for unlocking a more dynamic and effective delivery of results would mean that this approach is more cost effective. The exciting part is the appetite and enthusiasm within the CCAFS team that will ensure this methodology has the greatest chance of adoption.This change area is essentially an internal communications and organisational management challenge for CCAFS. Participants for this Change area identified the Goal as \"Social Learning is validated within CCAFS (CGIAR) as a mainstream methodology\". It was felt that the indicators for success here would include:• A significant percentage of CG funded proposals to include explicit reference to and design of project including social learning as a central part by 2020.• A dynamic based of \"artefacts\" or products (tools, activities, processes, publications etc) with shared attribution and use -a clear connection here to the change area around documentation.• A porous CGIAR and partners' network with two-way learning.Such a change clearly demands buy-in at the very highest level within the CGIAR management and within the family of hard and social scientists. This demands a consistent and thoughtful process to create an enabling environment for change. It means leveraging key opportunities for talking about change, providing the evidence for change and for determining a good communications strategy for change. This change would unfold more quickly if there was a strong alignment and added value in achieving strategic priorities and to demanding delivery targets.For CCAFS and CGIAR investment in a more deliberative, transaction-heavy way of working and the evidence supporting this change must ensure that people can see the added value demonstrated in the impact at community level. There must be no doubt that this is the best way forward for real development impact.Institutions like the CGIAR -and many others are struggling with meeting high numerical delivery targets in uncertain and complex situations. Social learning needs to make this easier and not more complex.The This growing community of people prepared to champion a social learning methodology is a vital part of building the interest and influence to make this change.Where we are now:Our most recent research is suggesting that a social learning approach that does not include a change in methodologies in institutions but only affects the individuals involved can cause greater dissatisfaction and disempowerment 2 . Increased knowledge and awareness and then an inability to make anything happen is potentially worse than a less inclusive process. Embracing this reality would have a considerable impact on stimulating internal behavioural change.A key challenge to this change area was whether CCAFS/CGIAR has the right expertise in social learning to take leadership. Two responses here are that CCAFS will not be doing this alone -it will always be working with partners and with alliances to implement projects but perhaps more importantly this is a co-learning process that will involve all parties in responding to collective challenges. Some interesting work was done at our most recent meeting that looks at where CGIAR is positioned in its work with partners and across the different levels 3 . Further exploration of where CGIAR can add value will be helpful.Develop the Dynamic Basket of Good Practices• Articulate the internal social learning goals for CGIAR.• Use the Inventory of Cases and additional research to begin to build a list of good practices that will help CGIAR achieve those goals.• Identify and organize an advisory group and champions that will catalyse social learning within the organization.• Identify partners and alliances to involve in the process.• Organize training sessions, awareness raising campaigns, and coaching and mentoring schemes to encourage institutional change.Change Area Aim: That all CCAFS/ CGIAR social learning processes or projects recognise the importance of context specific local structures, governance, cultures and systems.Endogenous social learning is social learning that is firmly rooted in the political, economic and social frameworks of the locality or region. It would be social learning that brought together stakeholders that represented not just a socially differentiated community of actors but a set of actors that acknowledged the governance, traditions and local authorities of the region as well as an understanding of the local organisations and trade federations.Communication The recommendation of the group was there should be three pilot studies identified that would specifically focus on endogenous social learning -case studies where there would be strong evidence of the social learning potential, strong evidence of working relationships between communities and local institutions, the role of customary laws, strong local values and priorities. The aim would be to run three projects over a two year period to help engage partners and build relationships -this would provide an opportunity to document and assess changing needs and redefine the process.Further research on social learning in the impact assessment is revealing the importance of repeated mutually beneficial interactions over a period of time. This supports the idea of running a pilot project over a couple of years that fully recognises local practices, values and priorities. Endogenous social learning is clearly not a \"different\" social learning, but without this local focus and an understanding of local priorities and values social learning is unlikely to take place.Develop the Opportunity Assessment guidelines• Determine key areas to include in the guidelines, e.g. traditions, values, rights, etc.• Draw up a worksheet that will help CCAFS to evaluate which areas present opportunities.• Determine the principles and terms of reference for the framework.• Develop the Joint Needs Assessment.• Determine which key areas to include in the Assessment, e.g. funding, research support, capacity, knowledge, experience.Design and conduct three pilot studies to test the three tools. These would be around case studies with 1) strong evidence of social learning potential, 2) strong evidence of working relationships between communities and local institutions, and 3) strong evidence of the role of customary laws, strong local values and priorities.Change Area Aim: That any CGIAR social learning projects and processes recognise the complexities of social differentiation and the related power relationsThe dictionary definition of social differentiation is \"the distinction made between social groups and persons on the basis of biological, physiological and socio cultural factors as sex, age, race, nationality etc. It is about recognising that any community is made up of different groups of people who represent both collective and individual interests. In the last few months, a more detailed exploration on social differentiation, the implications for CGIAR projects and case studies with a strong focus on social differentiation has been started. This will help to underpin the subsequent work of this change area.An understanding of social differentiation was an important change area identified because it has a vital part to play in identifying the real needs of communities. Decision making on future food security and climate change at the local level is often not inclusive or equitable. In communities where there are strong hierarchies or caste structures it will be difficult to ensure the inclusion of the full range of voices who have something to say. In communities/ countries/groups where free speech has been curtailed or dangerous for political reasons it can be difficult to ensure the right spaces for discussion and engagement. For real social learning to take place it may be important to collect the views and experience of all members of society or certainly those who are not used to working together.A social learning approach will need to ensure it facilitates the right kind and number of processes, perhaps running in parallel that ensure the engagement of different groups in an unthreatening and relevant way.This change area is indeed critical to successful social learning but has the potential to be hidden. Social learning should imply the engagement of stakeholders across the spectrum but unless there is a conscious effort to understand the social structures, hierarchies and social norms, critical views and experiences relevant to solutions will be missed. In the same way that endogenous social learning needs to recognise values, priorities and governance, social learning that recognises the social differentiation of a given community needs to facilitate and ensure equality of engagement.A key implication for CCAFS in adopting a social learning approach that recognises social differentiation is to ensure it is working with the right partners and that projects are designed in a way that responds to the communication needs of the different groups involved. Learning processes adapted for different groupings might need to refer to particular timings, particular people present or not present, particular seasons or needs etc. The use of different language for both clarity of understanding but also to capture nuance -for example people may say different things if working in an official language than they may in a colloquial or tribal language.Translating hard science in a way that relates to daily practice may inform choices for different communication methodologies.What is the project work that is expected to take place? Workshop participants envisaged a programme to catalyse change to ensure there was a good understanding of the role of social differentiation within social learning approaches. Some of the work here was similar to that proposed in the social learning within CGIAR change area. An important part of the next steps here was to review CGIAR projects to find further opportunities for projects that speak to a more socially differentiated approach as well as to review and speak to those who are already prioritising this way of working. Creating a working group within CCAFS was seen an important way to catalyse further thinking. The report to review the project is underway and a working group to help champion social learning within the organisation has been established.Similarly, building a network, or a community that builds our understanding and experience of social differentiation for social learning (Social LSD) was suggested as a critical part of this catalyst. Using the skills already housed with the CCAFS team and within ILRI in particular, facilitating the right kind of catalytic spaces for good dialogue, discussion and development was a key part of next steps.The final activity for this change area was to support the development of a research agenda -an agenda built through a social learning process using all three loops, again much the same as the change area activities for social learning.Where we are now:Much of the activity highlighted here was felt to be too removed from the community level. Much of the work of the community of practice already established will help with building the understanding of social differentiation and in identifying further projects to support. Importantly though, this change area needs to work harder outside of the community and with external partners to think about where social differentiation is designed into projects and where it is not.• Solicit knowledge and experiences from members of CGIAR using this approach.• Review all CGIAR projects to find opportunities to use this approach.• Begin building a network/ community of internal and external practitioners and develop a space/ platform for these practitioners to share and build learning on this approach.• Develop a research agenda on the topic using a triple looped learning process. Whilst workshop participants recognised the challenge of different framings of time it was felt the first step in this change area would be to craft a Theory of Change that addressed the issues of short term and longer term adaptive capacity and how longerterm considerations can be addressed through short term incentives to invite greater participation from stakeholders. Development of this theory of change would lead to developing three particular methodologies for sharing with future projects: a time-horizons evaluation framework, an incentives framework and methodologies for evaluating subsequent change.The Time horizons evaluation tool and Incentives framework would help to frame a series of sequenced activities and commissioned research that would look at current methodologies for risk management, psychology and behavioural economics. It would look more carefully at the target audiences, the role that they play within a given scenario and their time windows and how that relates to local, national, regional and global levels. These activities and research would then underpin the development of a tool to provide methodologies that others could use to test how effectively time scales were aligned in future projects.It is envisaged that there will be a number of commissioned research activities looking at how state of the art thinking on psychology, behavioural economics, risk and development social science can frame a view of particular CCAFS project in particular regions.It is also envisaged that there would be subsequent evaluation of these projects.Where we are now:This theme was a critically important change area that was identified by a number of people but it is the one that is the least well defined from participant discussion. The challenges by the peer group of experts invite greater clarity on how we can create incentives for different stakeholders to consider different timescales. Some interesting work was done by the group working on this to look at the different timescales and interests of different groups to start the framing but it was clear that it needed some further thinking and articulation through these next project ideas.Develop a Theory of Change• Identify main time scale issues.• Identify solutions for bridging long term and short term needs, as well as increasing stakeholder involvement.• Conduct research on current methodologies for risk. management, psychology and behavioural economics.• Identify key assessment areas to include in the Evaluation Tool, e.g. target audience, time window, national context, etc.The five change areas outlined here will be mapped against the second literature review carried out by IDS and IIED with a view to challenging or aligning them with the perceived pre-conditions for good social learning emerging from the study. The sandbox is developing discussion themes and it is clear that these discussions could invite particular comment in the five areas.","tokenCount":"3820"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0916780789.json b/data/part_2/0916780789.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..caf24921e5efe5bcde5e5e29c66419129019075c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0916780789.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"145bdcbfedcfe48b4d2ba48fc6fbee7c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/de828121-933d-4e66-989d-782b169d30fc/retrieve","id":"1298897941"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"6644fc2d-ebae-4bcf-a633-0337787aa951","pagecount":"12","content":"▪ The number of goats in Senegal increased dramatically over the last three decades from around 2 million heads to over 6 million heads in 2017 (FAOSTAT 2019).▪ Goats and other small ruminants are generally managed by women o Women also tend to control incomes from the sale of goats and goat products.▪ Goats are also used as a store of wealth and are more easily traded following shocks, which can increase household resilience.▪ Because goats are typically given as gifts, almost all agricultural households own at least some goats (Sow et al. 2021).▪ Goats constitute an important animal source food, as goat milk is generally consumed by young children in the household and goat meat is consumed as part of many religious ceremonies (Traoré et al. 2018).o Goat products could be leveraged further in the context of under-and malnutrition, particularly for young children and mothers.Study Objectives o To examine entry and exit points for nutrition along value chains has become increasingly important in order to increase access to nutrient-rich foods.o Important food safety and health risks at later stages of the value chain should also be identified and addressed to ensure that goat meat provides maximum nutrition benefits without the health risks.o To identify opportunities for women along the goat value chain in order to identify opportunities for women's empowerment and to strengthen the nutrition outcomes. ▪ \"As a coping strategy, we are forced to sell some of our goats to buy feed for the rest of the herd. We do not use storage and fodder reserve techniques. We cannot grow fodder crops due to lack of financial means and lack of water. To dig a well requires a lot of money because the water table is very deep in this locality. We can only store small quantities of straw harvested in the area.\"o Woman in Dahra Djolof▪ At the level of the Ministry of Livestock, they do not distinguish the goat sector as a separate sector, but reason in terms of the small ruminant sector by combining sheep and goats. ","tokenCount":"342"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0916799531.json b/data/part_2/0916799531.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..370380e7e399be316c3b15eafded92b49de17554 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0916799531.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7313e8bd4185985ecb32ad823dbcf246","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/66598127-a6bd-4c6d-bf34-6295b995271c/content","id":"-1803025530"},"keywords":["Emek","Ankara","Turkey"],"sieverID":"7d24cff0-3596-467a-9201-3ca483e6bd2e","pagecount":"3","content":"Fusarium algeriense Laraba & O'Donnell has been recently described as a novel crown rot 12 pathogen of wheat within F. burgessii species complex (Laraba et al. 2017). To our 13 knowledge; there are no reports of the existence of this pathogen outside of Algeria. Inwheat plants exhibiting symptoms of crown rot including brown discoloration on the first 16 two or three internodes of the stem were collected before maturity, at maturity and/or 17 after harvest. To identify the pathogen, symptomatic crown and stem base tissues were 39 cm diameter pot filled with a sterile mixture substrate containing equal volumes of peat, 40 vermiculite, and soil. Approximately 1-cm diameter mycelial plugs from cultures of each 1 isolate were placed in contact with the seeds. Seeds inoculated with sterile agar plugs were 2 used to serve as control. The seeds were covered with the same mixture substrate and 3 then the pots were transferred to a growth chamber of 23±2°C and 14-h photoperiod. The 4 experiment was conducted twice with five replicate pots per isolate. Four weeks post-5 inoculation, discoloration of the crown was observed on the inoculated plants, while no 6 symptoms were observed on the control plants. Koch's postulates were fulfilled by 7 reisolating and identifying the pathogen based on morphology described above. This is the 8 first report of F. algeriense causing crown rot of wheat in Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan is the 9 second country after Algeria in which the pathogen was detected. Although all Algerian 10 isolates were obtained from durum wheat, isolates in this study were isolated from bread 11 wheat. Further investigation is needed to understand its potential distribution and impact 12 on wheat crops.","tokenCount":"278"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0924237334.json b/data/part_2/0924237334.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1a22a8f0178f8f9756f36872a5614bc7239cfe9a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0924237334.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3bca1f91785aeaf65be2c88c38fc7aea","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/850e955d-64c6-461c-8f52-5a649252b8ae/retrieve","id":"624284304"},"keywords":["Myanmar","Climate Services","Agriculture","Food Security"],"sieverID":"c1ebd0e7-c62c-4943-96da-f87306d98c80","pagecount":"42","content":"The increasing variability of seasonal climate and increasing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events that are expected to accompany climate change will impact agricultural production and food security in Southeast Asia. The timely provision of climate information is one mechanism to help societies and individuals prepare for and adapt to these changes. This report assesses the state of climate information products and services in Myanmar, including how such services are disseminated and utilized by national actors. It includes recommendations to help meet the climate information needs of the agriculture and food security sector in Myanmar.Ruby Rose Policarpio is an Institutional Development Specialist at Regional Integrated Multi-hazard Early Warning System (RIMES), where she is responsible for liaison with the Department of Meteorology and Hydrology (DMH) of Myanmar and with other national meteorological and hydrological services throughout the region. Contact: ruby@rimes.int Michael Sheinkman is a food security analyst, on special leave from the United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) to strengthen CCAFS partnerships with food security actors.Since 1991, At WFP's Regional Bureau for Asia, he led food security analysis and served as the focal point for Climate Change issues, providing technical advice for the design and implementation of research or risk reduction activities integrating food security and climate change adaptation. Contact: m.sheinkman@irri.orgAgriculture is vital to the Southeast Asian economy. Hosting most of the region's workforce, agriculture is a main driver of food security and development. Agriculture, however, is climate-sensitive and thus, climate variability and extremes impact on food production.Aberrations from normal climate, especially in terms of rainfall and temperature, exacerbate risks to food production. Differential risks to agriculture and food security are likely, based on location-specific climate manifestations, agro-ecosystems, and production practices and conditions. Climate variability, weather extremes, and climate change necessitate strategies to be put in place for mitigation of anticipated adverse impacts. Hence, climate information of different timescales, to guide informed decisions, is essential. This report is part of a series that evaluates the status of climate information products and services for agriculture and food security in six (6) countries of Southeast Asia: Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Myanmar, Philippines and Vietnam. Each country report evaluates the mechanisms and systems used to generate, communicate, and apply climate information and services for agriculture and food security; highlights strengths and weaknesses; and provides recommendations for further development. Specifically, each country report includes: § Country background; § Capacities in climate information generation and application: The report components feed into an analysis of the end-to-end forecast generation and application process which involves observation of weather/climate parameters and generation of forecasts/warning information; generation of location-and sector-specific impacts outlook and response/management strategies; implementation of management strategies; and providing feedback to National Meteorological and Hydrological Services (NMHSs) on the forecast performance and management and/or mitigation strategies that were implemented.Gaps and potential opportunities for enhancement of the forecast generation and application system could guide institutions, working in relevant fields, in focusing resources to address country-specific concerns. In addition, institutions in the countries working in related areas could synergize their initiatives to maximize the benefits of current and planned initiatives.The series of country reports have been prepared by RIMES as part of its collaboration with the CGIAR research program on Climate Change, Agriculture, and Food Security (CCAFS), Southeast Asia regional program.According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), food security is a situation that exists when people, at all times, have physical, social and economic access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life. This underscores that food security necessitates (a)sufficient physical availability of food supplies; (b) adequate access, of households, to the said food supplies from their own production, from the market, or other sources; and (c) appropriate utilization of food for meeting individual dietary requirements (World Food Summit, 1996).Direct and indirect influences of climate on food security (Figure 1), include, but are not limited to (a) agro-ecological states impacting crop production and livestock rearing, (b) incidence/outbreak of pests and diseases in plants and animals, (c) demand for produce, (d) livelihoods and income distribution, and (e) human health. Climate impacts all three (3) key indicators of food security. However, this report focuses on the relationship between climate and food availability, specifically agricultural production. Myanmar's economy is largely dependent on the sector. Agriculture absorbs about more than half of the country's workforce. The majority of Myanmar's population lives in rural areas and depends on agriculture for their livelihood and food security.Rice is the most important agricultural crop in Myanmar. Cultivation occurs in irrigated lowland areas, rainfed lowland areas, and rainfed upland areas. The Ayerawaddy Delta is regarded as the country's rice bowl. It contributes more than half of the country's total annual rice production. Other areas where rice is cultivated include: the Dry Zone (Figure 3), in the semi-arid central part of the country; coastal areas; and uplands in the northern part of the country.Pulses, maize and oilseeds are the most important crops after rice. Exports of maize and pulses are important sources of foreign currency for Myanmar. Maize is predominantly grown in Monsoon season under rainfed condition. Oilseed crops are also grown in upland rainfed areas. The Dry Zone also contributes more than half of the national production of pulses.Pulses are also grown in the Ayerawaddy Delta and in Shan state.Agriculture in Myanmar is vulnerable to extreme weather events, drought, flood, erratic rainfall, temperature fluctuations, and delayed onset / early withdrawal of the Monsoon.Other vulnerabilities include: decreasing ground water levels, intrusion of salt water in coastal and delta areas; and irrigation induced salinity in the Dry Zone.Food systems in Myanmar are changing over time. Consumption of meat, eggs and milk are increasing. Consequently, market demand for maize continues to rise, with sown area and yield per acre increasing rapidly in the last decade. This is due primarily to the introduction of hybrid maize varieties and increased use of chemical fertilizers.Yields for both rice and maize are considered low compared to those in neighboring countries.Rice and maize production face several agronomic and input constraints that are compounded At the national level, Myanmar produces surplus food. However, food insecurity and childhood malnutrition remains endemic in some parts of the country, particularly the Central Dry Zone, Shan State, and Chin States. In Myanmar, climate variability is attributed to El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO).According to the Department of Meteorology and Hydrology (DMH), El Niño years, ENSO's warm phase, have resulted in deficient rainfall and higher temperatures in the country. LaNina, the cold phase, tends to have the opposite impacts. According to the Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED, 2013), seventy percent (70%) of natural disasters affecting Myanmar are climate-related (Wealer, 2013). Of the climate-related hazards and disasters, droughts, floods, and storms have the most significant impact on agriculture and food security. In addition, climate variability directly impacts agricultural production. Yi, et al. (2013) Rainfall. 50-year (1955-2007) rainfall data analysis suggests that overall rainfall in Myanmar has increased by 29mm per decade on the average. The trend, though, is variable: majority of the regions recorded rainfall increase, the greatest in Upper Sagaing, with approximately 215mm on decadal basis; decrease in yearly rainfall however was recorded in six regions, with Bago registering the greatest decrease per decade of about 81mm. Variations in the Southwest monsoon season duration have also been recorded, showing a decreasing trend, from the normal 144 days, with the onset becoming later and withdrawal becoming earlier.Drought. Drought can occur in a number of areas in the country, especially in the dry zone.DMH analysis of 50-year data suggests increasing frequency and intensity of drought events in Myanmar. Significant drought years in Myanmar were 1954Myanmar were , 1957Myanmar were , 1960Myanmar were , 1963Myanmar were , 1966Myanmar were , 1972Myanmar were , 1977Myanmar were , 1979Myanmar were , 1990Myanmar were , 2002Myanmar were , 2004Myanmar were , 2010Myanmar were , 2011Myanmar were , 2012Myanmar were , and 2013. . In 2010, by far the hottest year recorded in Myanmar, severe drought resulted to water stress in communities across the country and impacted agriculture heavily -production of peas, sugarcane, tomato and rice, among others, was adversely affected.Cyclones. In 135-year period (1877-2012), a total of 87 storms and severe cyclonic storms crossed Myanmar ( Climate projections for Myanmar, generated using PRECIS (Providing Regional Climates for and (e) increase in the occurrence and intensity of extreme weather events, including cyclones/strong winds, flood/storm surge, intense rains, extreme high temperatures and drought. Table 2 provides a summary of projections per time slice, while Table 3 lists extreme events anticipated in vulnerable areas in the country. In Myanmar, DMH is the mandated government institution to observe, analyze, predict, and provide warning services for weather-and climate-related hazards for protection of lives and properties, reduction of impacts of natural hazards, and sustainable resource management and development. In partnership with the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and other UN institutions, various international and regional climate centers, and development organizations, DMH works to develop forecast products and services to better cater to user needs. Hydro-meteorological forecasts issued by DMH are summarized in Table 4. Additionally, WFP also provides Food Security Assessment in various areas in Myanmar prone to food insecurity, provides an analysis of food insecurity triggered by relevant events, including climate-related hazards and provide recommendations to address food insecurity concerns. These publications provide monitored conditions and do not include forecast-based potential conditions and corresponding management strategies.In DMH communicates forecasts/warning information through multiple channels and mechanisms. Information is sent simultaneously to a) relevant ministries, which are to communicate the information to their line agencies and concerned non-government The recent shift in the political and policy landscape in Myanmar has facilitated collaboration between DMH and international and regional institutions. A detailed list of institutions involved in the generation, interpretation, translation, communication, and application of climate forecasts for agriculture and food security, along with their specific programs, projects, and activities is provided in Annex 1.The inaugural meeting of ASEAN Climate Outlook Forum (ASEANCOF) was convened in December 2013 by ASEAN, Meteorological Service Singapore (MSS), WMO, and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Like other Regional Climate Outlook Forums (RCOFs), the ASEANCOF aims to provide consensus seasonal outlook for the region to provide better guidance on the likely seasonal condition to NMHSs in the Member States.A wide range of forecast products is provided, by DMH, in Myanmar. Although there remains room for improvement in terms of enhancing forecast resolution, both spatially and temporally, the availability of climate information products of different timescales equips users the opportunity to anticipate potential climate conditions and make informed decisions.The utilization, however, of forecast is not exploited due to the following gaps, as elevated by stakeholders during Monsoon Forums conducted in Myanmar, as well as in other discussions, assessments, and reports by various other organizations.anticipation of potential opportunities and/or risks relative to forecasted conditions.Forecasts can be better utilized when it is supplemented with monitored/observed conditions.However, there is at the moment no mechanism to couple forecasts with observed conditions.In order to facilitate better decision-making among stakeholders, a summary of observed conditions, in various areas in the country for a relevant period of time, could be coupled to forecasts. This would help information users to better anticipate opportunities and risks and put in place appropriate management strategies.patterns in the country. Rainfall is significant to Myanmar agriculture. However, the current distribution of observation stations is not dense enough to sufficiently capture rainfall variability, both spatially and temporally, to establish micro-climatic zones in the country.This unestablished micro-climatic zones also contribute to make forecasting, and the application thereof, more challenging. Romano (2010) has to be done and the risk information has to be delivered to relevant stakeholders. Historical data has to be made available for stakeholders' analysis, for better guidance in putting in place short-term and long-term interventions in agriculture and food security. Romano (2010), in his report to FAO, indicated that there should be an integration of expertise, including an agro-meteorologist, in a technical body to convert available data into relevant information for food security.relevant stakeholders, remains to be a gap in Myanmar. Intra-institutional mechanisms in ensuring that forecasts and associated advisories reach the last mile, in user sectors, remain weak. Inter-and intra-institutional mechanisms, for information dissemination, have to be redundant and sustained in order for information to be accessible in the sub-national and community levels. Collaboration with MRTV and mass-based organizations (e.g. MyanmarRed Cross Society) has to be harnessed to maximize information dissemination with ample lead time. Forecasts should be included in media programs relative to agriculture; DMH and MOAI could take advantage of MRTV's Farmers Channel to maximize information dissemination. Further, forecast-based advisories could be included in currently available agriculture-and food security-related regular publications.In the aftermath of Cyclone Nargis in May 2008, international, regional and other development organizations implemented various interventions, in the sub-national and community levels,for better response to forecast information. These interventions, however, were anchored on extreme events like cyclones and did not include the integrated utilization of forecasts of different timescales. As most of these interventions focused on the utilization of short-range severe weather information, capacity building in forecast-based agricultural planning was not given emphasis. MOAI advocates the use of appropriate crop varieties in various areas in Myanmar. The utilization of these crop varieties though have to be anchored to seasonal and other forecasts for optimum productivity. Monsoon Forum stakeholders, during the 10thMonsoon Forum, recommended a capacity building mechanism for farmers for integration of climate information of various timescales into planning and decision-making. Capacity building for water associations in monitored information and forecast-based water management should be conducted. Provision of government support, for implementation of appropriate management strategies, could also facilitate better uptake of climate information in agriculture and food security.different information for application in their sectors. In Myanmar, stakeholders recommended that DMH do a thorough study of information needs of each sector at various levels. This would provide guidance in developing need/demand-based forecast/waning information.For stakeholders to better understand their future climate, analysis of location-specific climate variability, trends and projections have to be made.Climate change scenarios currently available are generally having coarse resolution and high uncertainty, hence could not adequately guide adaptation initiatives. Analysis of locationspecific (region-, state-, or division-wise) climate variability and development of climate change projections are required to facilitate information application. Access to historical data is necessary in order for agriculture and other relevant sectors to analyze and plan short-term and long-term management strategies.Forecasting technologies, tools for application, the nature of risks, and information requirements, by different stakeholders, evolve. This dynamic system of forecast generation and application necessitates regular assessments of capacities and gaps, in an end-to-end framework, to ensure that forecast information cater to differential needs of stakeholders vis-à-vis risk management.Absence of a rigorous drought monitoring system. DMH and MOAI do not have the capacity, at the moment, to issue drought early warning information. It is recommended that institutional capacity be built in both institutions for drought monitoring and early warning. ","tokenCount":"2495"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0960138400.json b/data/part_2/0960138400.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce9be4ab40dffb0600d4d25ef540ebc096b53389 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0960138400.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"be98f9647cbf5376c48039e1a0bf6c47","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://publications.iwmi.org/pdf/H037529.pdf","id":"946924000"},"keywords":["Decision-Aid","Great Ruaha River Basin","Integrated water management","Water allocation","Water productivity"],"sieverID":"150f358d-bf01-4724-b376-78ee1aeaf264","pagecount":"11","content":"The Great Ruaha River Basin is one of Tanzania's most important river basins. The basin includes one of the major rice producing areas in Tanzania and it embraces the Usangu plains and wetlands. The Great Ruaha River serves the Ruaha National Park and supplies water to two national hydroelectric power stations (Mtera and Kidatu). The basin is characterized by increasing competition over water resources and conflicts among users. Managers in the area face the challenge of devising effective measures to ensure efficient and equitable allocation of water resources. The conventional ways of allocating water resources in the basin have proved to be inefficient largely due to lack of integrated and strategic approaches to natural resource management. In addition, water allocation decisions have been reached without having a comprehensive understanding of the river basin characteristics and the inter-linkages between the different components, and are undermined by a lack of supportive tools for decision makers. This paper discusses the current water management framework in the Great Ruaha River Basin, the need for having a river basin Decision-Aid (DA), and a description of the DA, which is currently being developed by the RIPARWIN project (Raising Irrigation Productivity And Releasing Water for Intersectoral Needs). The DA is designed with the involvement of key stakeholders in the basin and will help assessing, among other things, the hydrological and socio-economic impacts of different allocation decisions.Decision support, and therefore Decision-Aid (DA) can be defined as an interactive system consisting of \"any and all data, information, expertise or activities that contribute to option selection ' [1]. This can be paper based, physical or computer based; and is intended to assist decision makers in their decision making process.Over the past 50 years, cross-sectoral water utilization in Tanzania has grown considerably due to rising human populations, and increasing food demands and economic activities that require water in their production. At the same time, agriculture has remained the engine of development in the country, employing more than 80% of the total population. Recognizing 1 this, the government of Tanzania has attached great importance to the development of this sector with irrigated agriculture being one of the options for achieving this. Yet, irrigated agriculture is globally the major consumer of water resource denying other sectors access to adequate water, including the environment and downstream users. In Usangu plains (upper part of the Great Ruaha River Basin), for example, irrigated paddy alone consumes about 576 Mm 3 of water, about one third of the annual outflow [3]. Irrigation activities in this area have increased significantly over the past 30 years and have been implicated as one cause of the drying up of the Great Ruaha River (GRR) in the Ruaha National Park (RNP).The Great Ruaha River Basin comprises multi-sectoral water uses that have different but important impacts on the livelihoods of the local people and on the national economy as a whole. Most of the population in the basin depend on irrigation and other water-related activities (such as fishing and livestock keeping) to sustain their livelihoods. Irrigated paddy is the main water user in the basin, mainly practiced during the wet season in the alluvial plains upstream of the western wetland. Dry season irrigation (for high value crops such as vegetables) only occurs in very localized areas in the upper courses of the rivers, but irrigation schemes have their canals abstracting water to meet other needs (e.g., domestic uses and dry season activities such as brick making). Due to these abstractions, downstream, most rivers that supply the wetlands have zero or very minimal flows in the dry season. This has resulted in transforming the western wetland from permanent to seasonal wetland and diminishing the amount of water supplied to the Ihefu wetland. Below the Ihefu wetland, the GRR has been drying up completely during the dry season for the last ten years. As the GRR is the major source of water for the park, supplying about 80% of the total water, this has caused significant ecological change of both aquatic ecosystems and wildlife in the park. In 2003, for example, about 5,000 fishes and 49 hippopotami died when the GRR dried up [7]. Downstream of the RNP is the Mtera Reservoir, which generates about 80 MW and acts as a regulating reservoir for the large Kidatu hydropower scheme, which generates some 204 MW.There has been a recognition that the conventional ways of allocating water resources among these competing sectors have proved to be inefficient largely due to a lack of integrated approaches to natural resource management. The decisions to allocate water resources judiciously are recent but in the past such decisions were made without a comprehensive understanding of the river basin characteristics, inter-linkages between the components, or tools to support decision-making processes. According to the National Water Policy [6. p.13] integrated planning and river basin management are compulsory in order to sustain the desired pattern of growth and consumption, and to ensure that all the socio economic activities maximize their capacities.The above arguments suggest a need for developing tools that will inform water managers and decision makers of the consequences of various decisions about water resources allocation and utilization. With this in mind, this paper reviews the current water management framework in the Great Ruaha River Basin, the need for a river basin Decision-Aid and presents a description of a computer-based DA, which is being developed by a research project 'RIPARWIN' (Raising Irrigation Productivity And Releasing Water for Intersectoral Needs). The paper also discusses the objectives of such a DA. called the 'RUaha Basin Decision Aid' (RUBDA).Natural resources in Tanzania were governed by informal rules until the early 1900's when the German colonial government first started efforts to curb water problems as a response to an increase of water demand. The first Statutory Water Law (1923 Water Ordinance) as well as by-laws concerning water management were created in the 1920's. These state policies remained until the 1960's when Tanzania adopted a more socialistic economy and launched effective in communicating findings it generated. R&D institutions have also fail to account how and to what extent investment in research has had impact especially on the poor and uptake by a wider section of beneficiaries (Bopp, 2002;Hazzell and Haddad, 2001;Gundel, et at.;2001).The problem is partly caused by the way research projects are designed, whereby most GUIDELINES FOR research projects do not demand a plan of how the research project and its outputs will contribute to impact on the livelihoods of the poor and ways in which research findings would be communicated to ensure that this happens. Because of this shortfall often there is an attribution gap between impacts and the contribution of research, thus making assessment of the impact of NRM research projects difficult (Douthwaite et at., 2003). The other stakeholders are necessary for creating enabling environmental to allow uptake of research products such as manufacturing and distribution, policies, institutions and processes that would promote use of the products. Uptake of research products need more players other than research, extension and farmers as suggested in the Agricultural and Knowledge Information Systems (AKIS) knowledge triangle (FAOlWorld Bank, 2000). Furthermore, R&D failed to address institutional and policy issues in order to support broader integrated strategy that addresses NRM and poverty. Ashby (2003) argued that researchers should recognize that outcomes and impact on NRM research depends on relationships with other stakeholders, who may have more power to visualize and to realize the desired outcomes of interventions than the researchers do.This posing a new challenge to researchers to manage \"the complex science-policy interface\" an important feature of integrated water resource management' (Lankford, et a/;2004). Managing this interface call for a change in the way research projects are designed and communicated to end users at all stages of research projects implementation. This would create better understanding of the research findings across a range of stakeholders in the R&D sectors, and use of information from research findings to a wider scale would increase research outcomes and impact on farming household's livelihoods and the watershed development.A number of policy and strategy documents were reviewed to get the insight of policy aspects about issues of NRM management and research guidelines and pathways through which policy are received, implemented and reviewed based on scientific evidence of their performance. Consultation with Policy makers, Research managers in the Directorate of Research and Development and Extension services managers in the Ministry of Agriculture and Director for Forestry Research Institute, Director of Postgraduate studies, Dean of University Faculties and NRM researchers was carried out at national level to col/ect information about policy and guidelines for research designs and how communication activities are funded and implemented. Two semi-structured questionnaire were designed to soliciting in-depth information. One questionnaire was administered to potential policy makers and research managers and the second questionnaire to researchers. Fifty researchers were interviewed; out of these 9 were women scientists (that is 19 percent) of the total respondents. Information at village level was also gathered to evaluate the current sources of information to farmers regarding NRM technologies with reference to rainwater harvesting in Maswa and Pare lowlands. Focus group discussions with farmers were conducted in twelve villages in Maswa. Mwanga and Same districts. Among other things research was to establish the efficacy of various communication methods and media in reaching a cross section of stakeholders.Hypotheses tested include: i)The role of research systems, institutions and researchers in uptake promotion is rarely recognised or promoted in policies and strategies that guide research on soil and water management. ii)The mind-set of most of research planners, managers and researchers in soil and water management are still fixated in linear dissemination approach of reaching the ultimate beneficiaries through extension services. iii)Research programmes and projects rarely include promotion and uptake plans. Iv)Research programmes and projects are rarely evaluated for communication, knowledge sharing, uptake and utilisation of knowledge and technologies produced. v)A very small proportion of programmes and project budgets and activities are committed or used in the communication and uptake promotion of research results. vi)Research outputs rarely include specific advise to farmers, input suppliers (e.g. fertilizer suppliers, manufacturer::;, extension services, policy makers and other clients. vii)Researchers are not adequately trained for communication and uptake promotion viii) The rewards and incentives systems like salaries, promotion, prizes to researchers do not demand evidence of utilisation and impact of research.Awareness In the University about 50% of the respondents were aware of policy documents guiding soil and water conservation. In the ARls on average only 37% are aware of these documents despite the fact that they are the makers and custodians of most of these documents. Scientists from other research institutions such as TAFORI are slightly aware of these documents. One of the reasons is limited accessibility to these documents, particularly in the ARls. The source of information on policies and strategies to researchers are mentioned as being MAFS headquarters (2%), institute libraries (8%), government website (7%) and friend/colleagues (2 °'.) 7<:;,.As a follow up to SMUWC, the RIPARWIN Project initiated further development of a DA through enhanced stakeholder involvement/participation. The actual structure of this DA, called RUBDA, was first adopted during the project steering workshop in September 2002 where key policy stakeholders from the ministries and representatives of most of Great Ruaha River Basin's stakeholders were present. Since then, the RUBDA has evolved in accordance to discussion held during various seminars, workshops and interviews that were held with stakeholders. The main objective of RUBDA is to support RBWO and Districts Councils (especially Mbarali and Mbeya Rural) in making decision concerning water resource management and allocation. For the last 10 years, these institutions have seen their role increase progressively, a role that will grow yet more with the coming Water Regulation Act.RUBDA is rightly described as a \"decision incubator\" [4]. In other words, the spirit of this DA is not to deliver \"ready-to-use\" answers for water allocation but instead to generate discussions between decision-makers that could lead to decisions being taken further down the line. This tool will allow the user to go beyond the existing hydrological model (UBM) to involve economic, environmental and social implications in the various scenarios created. It aims to support the implementation of the national water policy and enhancing users' understanding on various issues concerning water management. It is also fundamental to highlight the decision-making mechanisms that stakeholders are using and will use when managing water and land resources in the Great Ruaha River Basin In order to deliver appropriate \"answers and solutions\" supporting these mechanisms. We will not give in this paper a description of how RUBDA was developed using stakeholder participation, but instead concentrate on its architecture and main \"outputs\", offered as follows:• Act as a database; Assess the economical impacts of these water allocation strategies especially focusing on potential and impacts of transferring water between sectors on the basis of improved irrigation management and productivity.Up to 2004, the RBWO has been allocating water without elaborating an overall allocation strategy or a priority plan concerning the allocation of water. In other words, it is giving water to whoever asks considering only the water available without giving weight to the use of water. This then ignored environmental needs, even though the latter is of prominent significance in the new Water Policy. When dry years occurred the RBWO asked users to restrict their abstraction of water, without having a priority plan of whom to restrict first or any means of monitoring whether users were following instructions. However, recently RBWO started developing water allocation strategies where water rights are not a strategy on there own anymore but a tool, among others, to achieve the allocation plans. It has been observed that when issuing water rights in a particular location, basin authorities notionally use the \"10 or 20 year minimal flow\" in the river at this location to estimate the water available and then assess the effect of the new water abstraction on downstream users by consulting various actors, including Districts Councils. The RBWO is in charge of assessing the effect of new water uses at the basin level, but it does not have access to any tools or efficient means of .... quantitatively estimating these inter-relationships or effects. If correctly designed, RUBDA eQuid be a tool to help meet these needs for a strategic approach by providing a holistic description of the basin and the effects of allocation strategies.Several models constitute RUBDA: it is based on an upgraded hydrological model (the Usangu Basin Model or UBM). is supported by an Outcome Model and Water Management Modules (WMM) and is accompanied by a 'Geographical Information System' (GIS) viewer.Except for the hydrological model. programmed in Fortran 90. the other modules and users interfaces are developed in VISUAL BASIC. This programming language provides a means of developing interactive \"windows-type\" interfaces that are an added advantage when trying to develop \"easy-to-use\" software. Structurally, RUBDA can be divided in three parts as shown in Figure 1. The user is, here, given a description of the basin and is offered the opportunity to create scenarios. The description of the basin section is important for situating the policy-maker in recognising that the characteristics of the basin greatly affect the types of water management strategies that must initially be considered. RIPARWIN is trying to build a comprehensive database by collecting all the data scattered in the different institutions that are involved in the basin, including the RIPARWIN project data originating from field surveys. The description interface uses a GIS viewer (Figure 2) developed using a facility called MapObjects™technologies. This GIS viewer allows the user to examine, extract and print the comprehensive database using tables or dynamics maps. The data required to run RUBDA are numerous and cover a wide range of domains. These inputs ;;'lfe processed and used to run scenarios. In default mode, RUBDA runs by using actual data. This means that the \"baseline\" is the basin information as of 2003/2004 and that modifying this default data generates scenarios. These scenarios can be pre-defined scenarios, physical changes scenarios and water demand scenarios and may include the following:• Rainfall data: the user can here define a sequence of years. In other words, historical flow data have been classified from very wet, wet, normal, dry to very dry allowing the user to define the type of year (Figure3): • Input from the rainfall stations: new rainfall data. This utility can be used if the user has new rainfall data; • Irrigated area. This is a major driver of irrigation demand, it can be adjusted up or down; • Irrigation efficiency is another factor affecting water demand and can be adjusted; • Water abstracted for irrigation, related to the previous two, the total abstraction volume can be adjusted; • Environmental flow requirements. This establishes various instream and downstream demands that then need to be provided; • Western floodplain threshold value. This defines the size of the wetland, and is another measure of environmental conservation; \\ • Ifushiro wetland area and flow routing characteristics. This establishes the manner in which water is released to the Ruaha National Park; • Pre-defined scenarios such as \"balanced\" (optimal share of water between sectors; ensuring year round flow through the Ruaha National Park, but also allowing water for rice and hydropower), \"hydropower\" (priority given to hydropower generation through the Mtera/kidatu dams system -downstream of the catchment) and \"irrigation\" (priority given to agriculture water uses -upstream of the catchment).The physical scenarios (Le., 1 to 2 above) will allow the user to estimate the water that is available in the basin in different climatic situations, while the demand and pre-defined scenarios (i.e., 3 to 10) will directly assess the needs of the decision-makers. Indeed, the decision-makers have socio-economic objectives to reach and need to assess the effects of trying to reach those objectives. The pre-defined scenarios will be sort of \"teaching scenarios\" for training DA users, but will be the basis of more nuanced scenarios in the future. After defining the hydrological impacts of the various scenarios, RUBDA will evaluate their socio-economic impacts.Part of the data entered in the scenario interfaces is processed through the hydrological model and other part is directly used in the Outcome Model. The hydrological model basically addresses hydrological issues without giving due consideration to the economic and social issues as a comprehensive decision tool. The UBM has six components that tend to capture the main hydrological features of the basin. The components are; (i) the high-catchment rainfall-runoff pattern; (ii) the impact of human activities on the runoff (water demand); (iii) losses that occur on the alluvial fans (i.e. plains); (iv) flows through the western floodplain; (v) the routing through the eastern swamp; and (vi) the hydrological routing from the swamp through the Ruaha National Park to the Mtera Reservoir.The development of the UBM was based on a hydrological understanding of the basin using historical data of more than 40 years. The data include rainfall, climatologic parameters such as temperature, wind speed, relative humidity and sunshine hours, river runoff, land use and land cover. The inputs into the UBM are rainfall and/or stream flow at the high catchment with an optional evaporation as well as rainfall and optional evaporation on the plains including the wetlands (the floodplain and the swamp). The model runs on a dally basiS and so its outputs can easily be aggregated into decadal format that is useful for agricultural planning or into monthly format for water balance that is needed for managerial decisions.Once the hydrological model has run, the user has access to a large set of flows at different critical points in the basin. These pOints can be water available for irrigation and after irrigation, flows entering the swamps and wetlands or at the outlet of the basin. These flows are then combined with data acquired directly from the scenario interfaces to form the input to the Outcome Model. The aim of this module is to use the water available as an indicator to help addressing issues as livelihood, economic or environmental issues. The Outcome Model is developed using work undertaken by the RIPARWIN project on Water Productivity Indicators (WPls). \"Water productivity indicators can be defined in terms of physical, economical or social values. Physical indicators normally show the physical output such as ton or kilogram of crop biomass produced, the number of catches of fish from a given water resources/ecological system. The economic indicators derive from the physical ones in the sense that they represent the equivalent value in monetary terms ($) of the output from water given the market conditions. While some social indicators may fall into economic indicators they include benefits such as; the number of jobs created from the presence of the natural resource; livelihood sustenance directly from the natural resources; and the social value attached to the presence of water by rural communities. It is important to note that most social benefits are generally difficulty to value [5, p 2]. By using WPls, the DA intends to capture both intended and unintended benefits of water uses. The outcome model. in particular. intends to analyse tradeoffs and present that information in sectoral terms summed for the total volume of water allocated to each sector to allow comparison between sectors and in turn support decision-making over the re-allocation of water. Results generated when running scenarios are named indicators. These indicators were defined during workshops and interviews with stakeholders and represent the type of results needed to meet the various users' needs. The indicators assess the outcomes of the different scenarios and are of three types. The first set is physical, while the other two (economic and social) explain the tradeoffs of the new allocation patterns. The following is the list of indicators that were defined -this list is not exhaustive and still needs to be expanded: The indicators are presented as graphs, tables and maps using the GIS viewer (except for graphs) that can be printed or saved. The stakeholders themselves, through interviews, have determined the degree of support, the units and the \"scale\" in which the results are to be presented. .The Water Management Module (WMM) will constitute a set of sub-modules; here the user is prompted on critical issues that might have appeared in the results. These modules give information about institutional issues, demography, water and environmental laws or any other subject the user must keep in mind when running scenarios on water allocation. WMM could also contain information on real cases in other basins or impacts of decision on water management that have been made in the past. In doing so, this WMM briefly explains how inter-sectoral. water allocation m!ght be effected successfully and sustainably.The indicators and the outputs of the WMM are then combined as a \"package\". This package enables the user to print and keep a record of his/her scenarios, choices and results obtained. The report obtained in this interface can be used as a dissemination tool.Resolving current conflicts over water utilisation in the Great Ruaha River Basin requires that managers are equipped with tools that will assist in making appropriate and well-informed water allocation decisions. RUBDA, being developed under RIPARWIN, intends to serve as one of these tools. RUBDA will also act as a potential database and will help assessing the available water resources and hence the sectoral water demands at the sub-basin level. This DA is expected to assist the River Basin Authority in its task of reviewing and delivering water rights by matching it to the available water resources. By using the hydrological and socio economic information, the DA users will be able to assess the impact of each water allocation decision. In order to make the DA useful, there are some prerequisites that need to be observed. These include, among others, the need to collect and enter reliable data. In addition, involving all the key stakeholders in the on-going design and operation of the DA, as well as in other decision-making processes is very necessary if RUBDA is to be successful in helping resolving the current water management problems in the basin.","tokenCount":"3993"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/0986519517.json b/data/part_2/0986519517.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ebcf72e8f928de55414a1ae30931887b55812f51 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/0986519517.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"21f2295b90154f95add49bc8886ce1e7","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/ad3d1ba0-13f5-4c51-a2b9-7b09466f8a85/retrieve","id":"-1034614387"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"020b4aef-1e2f-4812-b6cd-e83bd58b36b6","pagecount":"12","content":"Durante 50 años, el CIAT ha trabajado en colaboración con cientos de socios a lo largo y ancho de América Latina y el Caribe (ALC).Trabajamos con agencias gubernamentales y otros socios sobre el terreno proporcionando herramientas y apoyo científico y técnico para implementar una agricultura eco-eficiente a escala. La labor de investigación del CIAT en ALC ayuda a comprender mejor y aprovechar las tendencias actuales y futuras y sus nexos con la seguridad alimentaria, la nutrición, el manejo de los recursos naturales, el cambio climático, los paisajes y la eco-eficiencia en el sector agroalimentario.Activo actualmente en 14 países en América Latina y el Caribe, el CIAT juega un rol valioso en la transferencia sur-sur de conocimientos agrícolas y aprendizajes en toda la región y en el mundo para acelerar la innovación y generar impacto en el desarrollo.El Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), un centro de investigación de CGIAR que funciona en África, Asia y América Latina, tiene su sede principal en Cali, Colombia. Durante 50 años, el CIAT ha trabajado en colaboración con cientos de socios a lo largo y ancho de América Latina y el Caribe (ALC). Durante este tiempo, el CIAT ha liderado el desarrollo y difusión de tecnologías, metodologías innovadoras, diseño de políticas y nuevos conocimientos que ayudan a los agricultores -pequeños, medianos y grandes -a mejorar la eco-eficiencia en la agricultura, contribuir a una mayor prosperidad y mejorar la salud humana mediante soluciones basadas en investigación en la agricultura y el medio ambiente. Un área central de colaboración entre el CIAT y sus socios nacionales en la región ha sido el fitomejoramiento para fríjol, yuca, arroz y forrajes tropicales. La adopción de variedades relacionadas con el CIAT tan solo en ALC en los últimos 50 años ha generado beneficios económicos calculados en US$16.300 millones en fríjol, US$10.800 millones en arroz, US$2.300 millones en yuca y US$1.580 millones en forrajes tropicales. 1, 2 E El equipo de investigación mundial del CIAT está conformado por más de 350 profesionales, con 119 científicos ubicados en ALC en la sede y principal eje regional del CIAT en Cali, Colombia, así como en oficinas nacionales en Nicaragua, Honduras y Perú. El equipo de investigación del CIAT en ALC reúne a una amplia gama de experticia disciplinaria en fitomejoramiento, socioeconomía y políticas, acceso a mercados y desarrollo agroempresarial, agroecología y manejo de cultivos, sistemas agropecuarios integrados, uso sostenible de la tierra, nutrición, sistemas de semillas, ciencia del suelo y mitigación y adaptación al cambio climático. El banco de germoplasma del CIAT en Cali, Colombia, se encuentra en el núcleo de los esfuerzos del Centro para lograr que la agricultura tropical sea más productiva y resiliente. El banco conserva las mayores colecciones del mundo de cultivos tropicales claves: fríjol, yuca y forrajes tropicales.1 Cifras presentadas en dólares estadounidenses de 2011. 2 CIAT. 2017. Los impactos de la investigación colaborativa del CIAT. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Colombia.Campo de ensayo de arroz en la sede principal del CIAT en Colombia (Neil Palmer/CIAT).Para satisfacer la demanda creciente de soluciones en investigación para el desarrollo a una mayor escala y dentro de un marco de tiempo proporcional con los retos mundiales en rápido y constante cambio, el CIAT está en proceso de establecer una alianza con Bioversity International, un Centro CGIAR hermano con mandato, estrategia, capacidades complementarias y presencia sobre el terreno.La alianza desarrollará e implementará soluciones con base en evidencia para forjar sistemas alimentarios y paisajes sostenibles y resilientes. Esto incluirá aprovechar mejor la biodiversidad agrícola, producir alimentos de cara al cambio climático, reducir la huella ambiental de la agricultura y asegurar un sector agrícola vibrante que impulse la prosperidad, el desarrollo económico y una mejor salud y nutrición humana.Esta hoja de ruta capitaliza sobre las sinergias y complementariedades del CIAT y Bioversity International para enfrentar con éxito estas oportunidades en ALC.A medida que el programa de la alianza evoluciona dentro de la región y emergen nuevas oportunidades, es posible que deban hacerse cambios a este documento.Se da a conocer ahora con el fin de orientar el trabajo del CIAT durante este período de transición e innovación institucional, de modo que se mantenga un programa fuerte y con visión de futuro a medida que evolucionan las prioridades y las disposiciones.Vista del Valle del Cauca, cerca a Palmira, la denominada \"capital agrícola\" del país, en el suroccidente colombiano (Neil Palmer/CIAT).3Noviembre 2018 | Semillas del Futuro, una nueva iniciativa, es un banco de germoplasma de última tecnología que se encuentra en desarrollo para garantizar la protección continuada de la invaluable reserva de diversidad de cultivos de la humanidad. Semillas del Futuro también posibilita las innovaciones en genómica y tecnologías de big data (inteligencia y minería de datos) para lograr un uso mejor dirigido y más orientado por los datos de la diversidad de cultivos al expandir la dimensión digital del banco. Ubicado en una zona de alta riqueza en biodiversidad mundial, Semillas del Futuro servirá como plataforma para reunir a científicos de recursos genéticos de todo el mundo.Las alianzas están en el núcleo de la estrategia del CIAT en la región. Nuestro mandato para lograr impacto a escala implica que trabajamos con agencias gubernamentales y otros socios sobre el terreno brindando herramientas y apoyo científico para implementar una agricultura eco-eficiente a escala. La investigación del CIAT en la región ayuda a comprender mejor y aprovechar las tendencias presentes y futuras y sus nexos con la seguridad alimentaria, la nutrición, el manejo de los recursos naturales, el cambio climático, los paisajes y la eco-eficiencia en el sector agroalimentario. Activo actualmente en 14 países en ALC y en más de 50 países a nivel mundial, el CIAT juega un rol valioso en la transferencia sur-sur de conocimientos agrícolas y aprendizaje en la región y en el mundo para acelerar la innovación y generar impacto en el desarrollo. Dado que la agricultura utiliza más del 50% del agua de la región, surge una inmensa oportunidad para innovar en los sistemas de producción eficientes en su uso y en la conservación del agua en los paisajes agrícolas. El recurso hídrico está surgiendo como un discurso de marco importante para políticas y prácticas en la agricultura, y el acceso continuado para los pequeños agricultores enfrentará retos mientras que sus medios de vida agrícolas dependerán más de la disponibilidad de este recurso.Los focos de malnutrición, la falta de calorías suficientes y el hambre oculta persistirán, en especial en donde la agricultura y el autoprovisionamiento son importantes para la seguridad alimentaria. No obstante, a nivel nacional en muchos países, la obesidad reemplazará el hambre como el reto principal en materia de salud, con índices crecientes de diabetes y otras enfermedades no contagiosas relacionadas con la dieta que afectan a la población rural y urbana de escasos recursos. El crecimiento de las fincas medianas y grandes, y las grandes agroempresas al lado de un sector continuado de fincas pequeñas tendrá implicaciones para las estrategias de medios de vida de los hogares, la desigualdad y las economías rurales.La transición demográfica en las zonas rurales será hacia más pocos agricultores y de mayor edad, junto con una migración rural-urbana e internacional, que incluye a la juventud. Las políticas, los programas y la investigación deberán diferenciar entre estos grupos como usuarios finales.Las políticas de salud, incluidos los impuestos sobre los alimentos poco saludables y nuevos requerimientos de rotulado, las políticas de desarrollo económico que fortalecen al sector agrícola y sustentan el potencial de la región como proveedor clave de bienes ambientales mundiales, y las políticas comerciales que responden a relaciones globales cambiantes, todas ellas crearán potencialmente incentivos conflictivos para el sector agrícola.para los productores y los consumidores de la región, en especial los grupos de menos ingresos. El sector privado, incluidos grandes agroempresas, procesadores de alimentos y distribuidores, tendrá un rol cada vez más importante en la regulación de los sectores agrícola y alimentario con respecto al sector público.Existen incentivos importantes para la conservación de la biodiversidad, el agua, el suelo, los bosques, otros servicios ecosistémicos y los paisajes. El desarrollo agrícola tiene una mayor presión para ser compatible con el uso sostenible, la valoración y la conservación de los recursos naturales.El clima como un tema estratégico (y un verdadero reto) para el desarrollo económico y agrícola se centra en los cambios climáticos a largo plazo así como en una mayor variabilidad climática a corto plazo y la exposición a fenómenos meteorológicos extremos. Los paisajes productivos y las comunidades que sean resilientes en estos tres contextos serán la arquitectura del futuro.Con los índices de pobreza en descenso y el PIB per cápita en aumento, principalmente en las zonas urbanas, la distribución desigual de la riqueza seguirá siendo un reto primordial para el desarrollo en la región.Los sistemas nacionales de investigación y extensión agrícola (SNIEA) y los sistemas nacionales de innovación en América Latina son heterogéneos, con una brecha creciente entre un puñado de SNIEA sólidos, con recursos suficientes y fuertes vínculos con el sector privado y la mayoría de SNIEA con capacidades limitadas que requerirán estrategias diferenciales.Agricultor de tierras altas en Bolivia (Neil Palmer/CIAT).Tema de investigación 1:América Latina y el Caribe (LAC) alberga países que encabezan las listas por obesidad; en promedio en la región, el 60% de los consumidores padecen sobrepeso. Estas cifras, junto con la incidencia de la diabetes, están creciendo rápidamente y las mujeres son las más afectadas. 3,4,5 La desnutrición en ALC es más baja que en otras regiones (6.6%); 6 no obstante, dentro de ALC, algunos países registran niveles de desnutrición hasta de un 40%. 7 La obesidad, la desnutrición y el hambre oculta coexisten dentro de muchos países de la región. Las transformaciones en los sistemas de mercado y los cambios en las dietas están ocurriendo rápidamente y el sector privado juega un rol cada vez más importante en la producción, procesamiento y distribución al detal de alimentos a medida que ALC consolida su posición como el principal exportador neto de productos agrícolas y alimenticios a nivel mundial. 8 A futuro, necesitaremos mejorar los cultivos con mayor calidad nutricional, continuando a su vez el desarrollo de variedades que muestren alto rendimiento, se adapten a distintos entornos y sean resilientes a múltiples estreses. Aunque habrá un enfoque en los cultivos centrales del CIAT (fríjol, yuca, arroz y forrajes), los cultivos de alto valor (café, cacao) y los sistemas alimentarios en general también serán parte de los objetivos.Creemos que la agricultura (apoyada por instrumentos de políticas claves) tiene un enorme potencial para catalizar procesos de inclusión socioeconómica en las zonas rurales y abordar las causas estructurales de la agitación social y política en muchos países de la región. Tendremos que profundizar nuestra comprensión de los sistemas de mercado que sirven a la población de escasos recursos y cómo ellos afectan los resultados nutricionales, la generación de ingresos y la distribución equitativa de los beneficios para la población pobre rural y urbana y para los productores y los consumidores. Esto requerirá de investigación e innovación en los sistemas tradicionales de mercado, ambientes alimentarios, políticas de información en nutrición para incentivar opciones saludables para los consumidores, y disposiciones institucionales que apoyen resultados nutricionales positivos a través del consumo, incluidas la indagación más a fondo del nexo alimentario rural-urbano y la vinculación con iniciativas de desarrollo urbano conectadas a la alimentación, entre ellas la agricultura urbana y la rotulación de los alimentos. 9Incluye el desarrollo de cultivos y variedades en los cultivos centrales del CIAT con un enfoque nutricional; trabajo en contaminantes y prácticas de producción relacionadas con la inocuidad de los alimentos; enfrentar la malnutrición mediante estrategias de innovación en nutrición como la biofortificación;investigación en adopción y replicación a escala para entender y mejorar los resultados en nutrición para diferentes hogares y miembros de familias con énfasis especial en los roles marcados por el género; y apoyo a ministerios en la innovación en materia de políticas.Incluye comprender y cerrar la brecha de rendimiento para cultivos prioritarios mediante la investigación varietal, agronómica o de sistemas; sistemas productivos e investigación en mejoramiento para incrementar la productividad de la tierra, el agua, la mano de obra, la biodiversidad y el capital financiero;y sistemas agropecuarios integrados y agroforestería. Esta investigación debe considerar innovaciones tecnológicas que sirvan a los jóvenes y las agricultoras en particular, y tengan como objetivo fincas pequeñas y medianas en donde los retornos sobre la innovación son altos.Incorpora el desarrollo de indicadores y herramientas para evaluar los sistemas alimentarios en términos de resultados nutricionales, de seguridad alimentaria, resiliencia y equidad y las ventajas vs. desventajas para orientar las intervenciones en políticas; características y factores determinantes del ambiente alimentario para los consumidores de escasos recursos; y análisis de la salud, la nutrición y las políticas para impulsar la innovación en las megaciudades.Hasta octubre de 2018, más de 290 variedades biofortificadas de 12 cultivos básicos se habían liberado o estaban en fase de prueba en más de 60 países alrededor del mundo. América Latina y el Caribe también se ha visto beneficiada con el desarrollo de cultivos más nutritivos. Solo en el año 2017, se liberaron 8 variedades que incluyen fríjol, arroz, yuca, maíz y batata.Especialistas en semillas y comercialización están trabajando en cadenas de valor para introducir y acelerar la adopción de cultivos biofortificados.Tal es el caso de Colombia, donde se está implementando un programa nacional para impulsar a los agricultores a hacer la transición de cultivos ilícitos a cultivos alimentarios básicos. Actualmente, se están produciendo semillas para que 10.000 hogares en Colombia puedan cosechar los beneficios, tanto nutricionales como económicos, de los cultivos biofortificados.Cubre la investigación en cadenas de valor y modelos de negocio sensibles a la nutrición y el género, incluyentes, resilientes al clima y ambientalmente sensatos (por ej., libres de deforestación);investigación en el sector alimentario tradicional y los sistemas locales de mercado; y mejorar la rentabilidad y la sostenibilidad de los sistemas productivos reduciendo a su vez las huellas ambientales.Nuevas alianzas incluirán los sectores salud, medicina, ciencia/procesamiento/inocuidad de los alimentos, que apoyen a los países para reenmarcar su comprensión sobre las conexiones entre la agricultura, los alimentos y la salud, y la manera de regular y articular apropiadamente estos sectores para lograr mejores resultados en nutrición y reducción de pobreza. Los actores del sector privado, incluidos comerciantes, procesadores, distribuidores, organizaciones de productores, consejos de productos básicos (commodities) y actores tradicionales del mercado; integración comercial internacional o mesas de trabajo del sector privado como la WEF e ICCO/ICO; e iniciativas internacionales como Food-Smart Cities y el programa 10FYP SFS del PNUMA serán socios importantes en esta agenda de investigación.El estrés hídrico, el cambio climático, la pérdida de biodiversidad, la deforestación y la degradación de tierras son preocupaciones cada vez más importantes dentro de la comunidad internacional, al igual que para los gobiernos nacionales y regionales en ALC. La región posee importantes zonas de naturaleza y biodiversidad. Los gobiernos y los actores del sector privado cada día son más conscientes de que el crecimiento de la productividad en la agricultura por su propio bien no es suficiente, e inversiones públicas y privadas de gran escala se están reorientando con mayor frecuencia en torno a indicadores ambientales de interés. Los paisajes para la prestación sostenida de servicios ecosistémicos en donde se reconcilian los fines productivos y de conservación están recibiendo una atención creciente a expensas de un enfoque estrictamente productivo para el desarrollo rural. El cambio climático ha desafiado a los comerciantes de productos básicos para invertir en la resiliencia y el desempeño ambiental de las cadenas de valor con un enfoque en la estabilidad a largo plazo del abastecimiento.En lo sucesivo, el trabajo del CIAT en paisajes y sistemas de producción agrícola para ALC deberá vincular más estrechamente la productividad y rentabilidad del sistema en el corto y largo plazo, incorporando indicadores de crecimiento verde y la prestación de servicios ecosistémicos, generando así contribuciones cuantificables para los objetivos frente al clima, la pobreza y la conservación de recursos nacionales y regionales. La región necesitará más soluciones que se inclinen hacia los paisajes productivos sostenibles en donde la agricultura y la restauración funcional estén integradas, demostrando cómo el desarrollo del sector agrícola contribuye de manera positiva y verificable a los compromisos nacionales e internacionales, como las contribuciones determinadas a nivel nacional (NDCs).El agua será especialmente importante, dado que la agricultura usa el 70% del agua de la región. 10 Se requiere mucha más investigación en infraestructura de riego eficiente en el uso del agua y en políticas de apoyo, así como en el manejo de recursos hídricos a modo más general que apoye los diversos usos para la agricultura, los hogares, la energía y la industria.Incluye desarrollar y promover la adopción de prácticas agroecológicias a nivel de parcela, finca y paisaje que logren un uso más eficiente del agua y los nutrientes, conserven la biodiversidad, reduzcan los problemas de plagas (por ej., controles biológicos), restauren suelos, paisajes y servicios ecosistémicos, y que promuevan los sistemas agrosilvopastoriles integrados.• Restauración a nivel de paisaje de los ecosistemas degradados Cubre el diseño e implementación de paisajes productivos que apoyen los medios de vida, la biodiversidad y los servicios ecosistémicos, con énfasis en agua, carbono y gases de efecto invernadero para sitios específicos; con la mirada puesta en áreas gravemente degradadas con potencial para la agricultura y la prestación de servicios ecosistémicos que promuevan actividades comunitarias; y usen modelos de negocios sostenibles.• Eficiencia del agua Ampliar nuestra agenda de investigación en sistemas y paisajes agrícolas sostenibles en el uso del agua, incluyendo inversiones en riego sostenible, tecnologías eficientes en el uso del agua, prácticas agronómicas y el involucramiento de asociaciones de riego para lograr eficiencia en el uso del agua y el manejo de cuencas.• Cuantificación y valoración económica de los servicios ecosistémicos Innovación con herramientas digitales y perfeccionamiento de métodos para la cuantificación, monitoreo y valoración económica de los servicios ecosistémicos; medición del impacto de las tecnologías e intervenciones como la restauración de tierras para orientar la planificación de la inversión y la formulación de políticas para los sectores público y privado.10 http://www.fao.org/americas/prioridades/suelo-agua/es/ El sistema de producción sostenible Quesungual ha sido implementado de manera exitosa en el Corredor Seco centroamericano para el manejo de suelo, agua y vegetación. Cientos de agricultores han aumentado sus rendimientos de maíz y fríjol, a la vez que han mejorado los servicios ecosistémicos y su resiliencia.El CIAT también viene trabajando en Centroamérica en medidas que mejoran la disponibilidad del agua y de herramientas que orientan la inversión en cosecha de agua para la agricultura. En Perú, la investigación del CIAT para determinar el valor de los servicios ecosistémicos fue clave en la aprobación de una ley que promueve mecanismos para la distribución equitativa de los beneficios económicos de la naturaleza.Será importante una colaboración mucho más fuerte con el sector ambiental, incluido el PNUMA, ministros del medio ambiente y otras agencias ambientales, ONG ambientales mundiales y regionales, así como la participación en debates sobre medio ambiente, construyendo puentes hacia la agricultura y facilitando la cooperación sur-sur. La integración con pueblos indígenas en la región, que a su vez son agricultores y guardianes de grandes tramos de bosques, presenta una oportunidad llevar a cabo investigación colaborativa y participativa, extensión e implementación de productos del conocimiento en la práctica.Resiliencia al clima ALC es altamente vulnerable al cambio climático, la variabilidad climática y los fenómenos climatológicos extremos. La importancia del sector agrícola para las economías de Sur y Centroamérica en términos de empleo, economías rurales, PIB y seguridad alimentaria hacen del cambio climático una amenaza muy real e inminente para la región. El cambio en el uso de la tierra y la degradación, en especial el avance de la frontera agrícola y la expansión de extensos sistemas de pastoreo, están acelerando los efectos del cambio climático en la región. Los compromisos frente al clima son cada vez más centrales en las agendas de muchos gobiernos de la región.Las capacidades y el liderazgo del CIAT en el área de cambio climático y agricultura nos convierte en un aliado clave en la región para ayudar a los países a transformar el cambio y la variabilidad climática en una oportunidad para el crecimiento sostenible en el sector agrícola. Para ello, el CIAT debe enfocar más esfuerzos en el caso económico para la agricultura resiliente al clima en el corto y largo plazo, aportando información para orientar inversiones e instrumentos financieros para liberar el potencial del sector.Incluye promover el desarrollo y la adopción de variedades tolerantes a la sequía/altas temperaturas/ inundaciones, prácticas agronómicas que promuevan la adaptación y mitigación, y sistemas de producción resilientes al cambio y la variabilidad climática.• Caminos resilientes al clima bajos en carbono Abarca el apoyo para los países en la región para cumplir con sus NDCs, desarrollar planes nacionales de adaptación (NAPs) y prospección para la planificación del sector.• Manejo del riesgo agrícola Incluye los servicios mejorados de información climática para la planificación de la inversión agrícola; servicios de asesoría digital para un mejor manejo de los cultivos, incluidos los servicios agroclimáticos para los agricultores; servicios y productos financieros, prácticas agronómicas para reducir el riesgo de plagas y enfermedades, así como la pérdida de rendimiento, e instrumentos para el manejo del riesgo de mercado, como los seguros agrícolas y el estudio de disposiciones institucionales en varios niveles.Las nuevas alianzas se enfocarán en instituciones financieras, comerciantes de productos básicos agrícolas y organizaciones de productores, partiendo de interacciones actuales bajo el Programa de Investigación de CGIAR en Cambio Climático, Agricultura y Seguridad Alimentaria (CCAFS), pero abriendo camino hacia el desarrollo y despliegue de productos por parte de actores del sector privado, incluidos los bancos de desarrollo. Las compañías de tecnología digital, proveedores de servicios de extensión, oficinas nacionales para el cambio climático, ministerios de recursos naturales e institutos meteorológicos también serán aliados importantes.El CIAT ha sido líder en la región en el desarrollo de servicios climáticos para el sector agrícola, diseñados para minimizar pérdidas de cultivos frente a la variablidad climática, reducir riesgos para los agricultores y contribuir a lograr una mayor rentabilidad para las empresas agropecuarias. Nuestra labor en Colombia ha ganado numerosos premios internacionales por su innovación e impacto para el desarrollo, y el CIAT participa en toda la región en el diseño y despliegue de nuevos servicios.El enfoque presenta a los agricultores nuevas habilidades, mejores prácticas y conocimientos sobre cómo incorporar información climática, específica por sitio, local, confiable y oportuna a partir de fuentes confiables en sus sistemas y estrategias de planificación. En Colombia y Honduras, se ha llegado a unos 330.000 productores a través de nueve comités locales técnicos agroclimáticos, y tan solo en Colombia, más de 150 mil productores están recibiendo servicios de asesoría agroclimática ajustados a sus necesidades, y 6.000 más han adoptado prácticas sostenibles adaptadas al clima.Los científicos de fenómica del CIAT usan drones para facilitar la evaluación y el diagnóstico fisiológico de los cultivos con base en información capturada en el campo (Neil Palmer/CIAT).América Latina y el CaribeEnfrentamos tiempos de cambio sin precedentes. El CIAT continuará innovando en torno a los pilares claves de la eco-eficiencia que buscan usar los recursos de una manera más efectiva para lograr incrementos sostenibles en la productividad, para ayudar a reducir la degradación de los recursos naturales y para crear oportunidades a fin de impulsar los ingresos y el empleo. No obstante, el paradigma del desarrollo agrícola está cambiando rápidamente de un enfoque centrado en maximizar el rendimiento a lograr que los cultivos sean más ricos en nutrientes. Adicionalmente, existe actualmente una tendencia para que la producción agrícola rinda más y mejores cultivos pero de una manera justa y limpia. En estos tiempos de cambio, el CIAT continuará siendo una organización de vanguardia que promueve varias estrategias para lograr el desarrollo sostenible.La investigación aplicada del CIAT para el desarrollo debe aportar información a la toma de decisiones, el diseño de políticas y la práctica. La alianza con actores locales, nacionales y regionales en el diseño, implementación y aplicación de investigación a escala apoyará la eficiencia y eficacia junto al continuum de investigación y desarrollo para abordar algunos de los retos más importantes que enfrenta la región. La formación de capacidades dentro de la región continuará siendo un componente importante de la estrategia del CIAT con el fin de transferir continuamente capacidades a los socios tanto para investigación como para su aplicación frente a retos de desarrollo. Los socios claves para que el CIAT logre impacto a escala incluyen ONGI, bancos de desarrollo, institutos gubernamentales (incluidos ministerios de agricultura y medio ambiente, institutos de investigación agrícola, como el CATIE, e institutos meteorológicos, entre otros), el sector privado, organizaciones de pueblos indígenas, agencias de la ONU y donantes. Las alianzas múltiples que integran los SNIEA, universidades, sociedad civil, el sector privado y los bancos de desarrollo serán esenciales. Entablar relaciones con institutos homólogos y socios que influyan en la agenda regional, como las instituciones de investigación, las organizaciones intergubernamentales y los foros también será fundamental.Dentro de ALC, varias subregiones brindan similitudes agroecológicas que permiten investigación transnacional/regional, intercambio o extrapolación de resultados, por ejemplo, Mesoamérica y países más grandes en el Caribe, islas estados más pequeñas en el Caribe, los Andes, la cuenca amazónica o el Cono Sur. Estas subregiones comparten además retos y prioridades similares, como es el caso de las reducciones de emisiones en el Cono Sur. Las redes políticas y técnicas a través de instituciones y plataformas regionales de integración como SICA, CARICOM, MERCOSUR, FONTAGRO y las INIA-Iberoamérica también pueden facilitar la formación de capacidades, la difusión y la escala de resultados y la participación en políticas, incluida la cooperación sur-sur. Partiendo de nuestra base en la región dentro de distintas agroecologías y redes sociopolíticas, el CIAT maximizará el impacto trabajando en ellas y a través de ellas para alcanzar escala e impacto.Los tres temas de investigación de esta hoja de ruta vinculan transversalmente las áreas de investigación del CIAT y responden a la Actualización de la Estrategia CIAT (2018-2020), para brindar soluciones aplicadas en diferentes contextos agroecológicos y socioeconómicos, movilizando conocimiento en la zona austral mundial. Como miembro del Sistema CGIAR, el CIAT, por medio de esta hoja de ruta, busca responder al Plan de Negocios de CGIAR, aprovechando transformaciones intensivas en conocimiento y colaboraciones fortalecidas con socios para enfrentar los retos globales en continuo cambio. La agenda de investigación propuesta partirá de los siguientes Programas de Investigación de CGIAR y a su vez contribuirá a ellos: Agricultura para la Nutrición y la Salud (A4NH); Cambio Climático, Agricultura y Seguridad Alimentaria (CCAFS); Políticas, Instituciones y Mercados (PIM); Agua, Tierras y Ecosistemas (WLE); Raíces, Tubérculos y Banano (RTB); Bosques, Árboles y Agroforestería (FTA); así como las Plataformas de Bancos de Germoplasma y Big Data. La alineación de nuestro trabajo con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) de la ONU nos permite trabajar al lado de países y otros socios para lograr una agenda compartida en torno al futuro que deseamos crear. Aunque el trabajo del CIAT contribuye de distintas formas a todos los 17 ODS, 9 de ellos son particularmente centrales para la misión del CIAT y para esta hoja de ruta, como se muestra a continuación. El CIAT buscará diseñar y aplicar acciones que puedan abordar diversos retos del desarrollo simultáneamente para contribuir a múltiples ODS. Carolina Navarrete Frías, Directora Regional para América Latina y el Caribe c.navarrete@cgiar.org","tokenCount":"4534"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1002380273.json b/data/part_2/1002380273.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a8342ed9f1028679938f6219889a23a3038fa6d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1002380273.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"08487883b67e3a0e42afa42520133118","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/98fe2589-12c1-4322-b52a-f062747b0f20/content","id":"425858963"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"c8e10478-b04a-4bad-b3bf-7b9416674540","pagecount":"40","content":"Breeding for drought tolerance is among the top priorities for CIMMYT's Global Maize Program. Drought tolerant maize is one of the flagship products of CIMMYT. Research on drought stress in maize at CIMMYT started in 1970s, and continued as one of the priority areas. This has been further intensified in the last ten years to cope-up with the climate change effects in the tropics.CIMMYT has been a pioneer in developing and deploying protocols for drought stress phenotyping, selection strategy and breeding for drought tolerance (Banziger et al., 2000;Zaman-Allah et al., 2016). The information presented in this manual is based on the work on quantitative management of drought stress phenotyping under field conditions that received strong and consistent support from several donor agencies, especially the BMZ/GIZ, Germany and the MAIZE CGIAR Research Program. The financial support for compilation and publishing this field manual from CGIAR Excellence in Breeding (EiB) platform is duly acknowledged.CIMMYT -the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center -is the global leader in publicly funded maize and wheat research-for development. Headquartered near Mexico City, CIMMYT works with hundreds of partners worldwide to sustainably increase the productivity of maize and wheat cropping systems, thus improving global food security and reducing poverty. CIMMYT is a member of the CGIAR Consortium and leads the CGIAR Research Programs on MAIZE, WHEAT and Excellence-In-Breeding (EIB) platform.In agriculture, the term drought refers to a meteorological condition in which the amount of water available through rainfall and/or irrigation is insufficient to meet the crop needs for optimal growth and development. This eventually affects overall productivity. Rainfed crops grown during the summer-rainy season in the tropics occasionally face extreme weather conditions. These extreme weather conditions translate into various abiotic stresses, such as intermittent/contingent drought, which constitutes one of the key abiotic constraints for crop production in many parts of the world. The erratic distribution pattern of rain in the tropics due to inter-annual variability occasionally causes prolonged dry spells at different crop growth stages, which results in poor crop growth and development and eventually poor yields.Crop breeding programs targeting drought tolerance using conventional and/or molecular breeding approaches rely heavily on high-quality phenotypic data generated under drought stress. One of the key prerequisites for generating a quality drought phenotyping data is accuracy and precision in managing drought stress in field phenotyping, so that genotypic variability could be expressed and precisely identified. Applying drought stress at required intensity with uniformity and precisely at targeted crop stage has been a major challenge, especially under field conditions, as several weather factors interact and affects the stress development and its intensity. Occasionally, the managed drought stress trials ended with either low or too severe stress, which is often realized after completing the trial. In this manual, the quantitative approach of managing drought stress with required intensity at targeted crop stage (for example -flowering stage), and with uniformity over space (across plot) and duration is discussed. This manual is developed for field crop breeders, crop physiologists, agronomists, masters or Ph.D. students and field technicians who are working on phenotyping and/or selection for drought stress tolerance in field crops.vCrops grown under rainfed conditions in tropics occasionally face contingent/intermittent drought largely due to erratic distribution pattern of rains.Drought is identified as one of the major factors responsible for year-to-year variation and instability in crop productivity and production in tropics. Crop breeding programmes targeting drought tolerance using conventional or molecular breeding approaches rely heavily on high quality phenotyping data generated from drought screening trials.Timing, intensity and uniformity of imposed stress in a drought trial is key for precision phenotyping and identifying available genotypic variability among test entries for drought tolerance.The key aspects for conducting a managed drought stress trials are described as follows:1. Understanding the target population environment:A clear understanding about target population environment (TPE) is essential for planning and selecting the best suitable selection environment where the phenotyping site should be established. The phenotyping site does not necessarily have to be in the target environment, but should have a good representation of the TPE. Therefore, a minimum set of information about the TPE is required for establishing phenotyping site, such as:▪ Daily weather data, at least for past 5 years, including maximum temperature (Tmax), minimum temperature (Tmin), relative humidity (RH) and rainfall.▪ Soil type, cropping season and cropping system, especially the cropping window for the targeted crop (e.g. maize) in the TPE.▪ Other relevant information, such as major biotic stresses and socio-economic constraints.Analysing these information will help in defining the most relevant type of drought stress and understanding the requirements for establishing a phenotyping site that is significantly related to the TPE.Though drought is a meteorological phenomenon that occurs due to prolonged dry-spell during rainy season, it is almost impossible to precisely predict such dryspells at targeted crop stage during rainy season. Therefore, a managed drought stress screen is conducted during rain-free dry season, where stress is imposed by managing irrigation schedule in such a way that test entries are exposed to desired level of drought at targeted crop stage. On the basis of a careful analysis of past 5 years weather data including T max , T min and rainfall for all potential locations, a suitable site with rain-free period during targeted crop stage could be identified. Apart from rain-free period, other weather conditions should be suitable for growing the crop at the selected location in the planting window identified for drought phenotyping trial. For example -in maize breeding for drought tolerance the targeted crop stage is flowering and early grain-filling stage. At Hyderabad location in India (17.3850° N, 78.4867° E, 545 masl), November to February months are usually a dry season as most parts during this period is almost rain-free (Fig. 1). Also, T max is <35 0 C and T min is >8 0 C in most part of this period, which is suitable for growing maize crop. Therefore, this site is identified as a suitable location for drought phenotyping, where planting can be takenup during last week of November, a trial with medium maturity group of entries reaches to peak flowering stage around 1 st week of February, and most critical stages of reproductive phase complete within month of February. At this site drought stress could be imposed at a desired intensity (and duration) and timing (targeted crop stage) with good uniformity by managing irrigation schedule.3. Establishing the drought phenotyping site:Based on TPE analysis followed by suitable location identification, a field phenotyping plot need to be selected for establishing a dedicated site for drought stress phenotyping. It is important to ensure that the selected field satisfies following basic requirements:▪ A field with medium textured soil (Fig. 2) and good water holding capacity in order to avoid frequent irrigation and/or very fast drought stress development after imposing stress by withdrawing irrigation.Fig. 2: Soil type requirement for a suitable field plot for drought phenotyping.▪ Soil physical properties of the phenotyping site should be characterized to determine the field capacity (FC) and permanent wilting point (PWP). This need to be done only once as it is a site-specific physical property of the soil and does not change over several years.▪ Well-levelled field to facilitate smooth waterflow during irrigation to avoid water run-off and stagnation in patches.▪ Good irrigation (and drainage) facility to avoid random drought stress or excessive moisture/ waterlogging during trial.▪ Field located away from large water bodies water (such as rivers, lakes, ponds etc.) as these could influence ground water- There are various options for mapping spatial field variability:▪ Ideally, it should be carried-out by growing a single crop variety (preferably the same crop for which drought phenotyping site is to be developed, as different crop may vary significantly in their sensitivity to soil physical and chemical properties) to be able to identify existing field variability and bad patches, if any.▪ Direct assessment of soil variability is possible through destructive soil sampling at different depth intervals (up to a depth of 90 or 120 cm) and analysis of key soil physical and chemical properties. This analysis can provide information on the suitability of a site for drought phenotyping. Soil samples should be taken across field using a square grid basis with a minimum of five sampling points per hectare (Masuka et al., 2012).▪ High-throughput techniques are now available for mapping spatial field variability based on soil electrical conductivity sensors, penetrometers, spectral reflectance, thermal imagery of plant canopies and measurements of plant growth as surrogates of variability (Prasanna et al., 2013).Drought phenotyping trials should be carried out with more phenologically homogeneous entries in a trial. Genotypes should, therefore, be grouped in trials based on similarity in their flowering-time. Such grouping should be preferably based on using growing degreedays (GDD) units. This is crucial for avoiding different levels of stress within a trial, as entries with different maturity group will reach the targeted crop stage (for example, flowering/early grain-filling) at different times.Ideally, all entries within a trial should have comparable flowering days, for example-in case of maize, a difference of 2-3 days (or equivalent GGD units) is acceptable, but more than 5.0 days difference in flowering days within a trial should be strictly avoided.In case there is no option but to take-up more than one maturity group trials at same site, then staggered planting (late maturity trials first and early at last, Fig. 3) can be used so that last irrigation is applied at same time in all trials with significant variation in flowering time.All the test entries should be first grown in the main crop season. GDD of each test entry can be calculated using the equation given below, and entries with similar maturity group should be grouped in one trial for managed drought stress phenotyping trials. GDD = (Tmax+Tmin)/2) -base temperature or absolute minimum temperaturewhere Tmax = hourly maximum temperature if Tmax >absolute maximum then Tmax = absolute maximum Tmin = daily minimum temperature if Tmin < absolute minimum then Tmin = absolute minimum.Note: There are four temperature thresholds, called the cardinal temperatures that define the growth of a crop, including the absolute minimum, the optimum minimum, the optimum maximum, and the absolute maximum. The absolute minimum and maximum temperatures define the coldest and hottest temperatures beyond which a crop will stop to grow. Temperatures between the optimum minimum and maximum define the best suitable range of temperature for the crop growth. These cardinal temperatures vary for different crops; maize (Zea mays L.), for example, has an absolute minimum temperature of 8°C, an optimum minimum of 18°C, an optimum maximum of 33°C, and an absolute maximum of 44°C.Except irrigation management to impose drought stress, all other recommended crop management practices should be followed in drought stress phenotyping trials. Adequate crop management, including timely application of recommended inputs and agronomic operations, is a pre-requisite for high quality phenotyping data.▪ Plant population: Number of plants per unit area is one of the components of final grain yield; therefore, this needs to be given due attention to ensure that the required plant population is maintained in the field. If seed is not a limitation, planting extra seeds per hill (or double density) and thinning-out extra seedlings, once seedlings are fully established is recommended.▪ Border effect: Border rows should be planted (in double-density spacing) all around the trials in order to avoid border effects on test-entries and any physical damage. In addition, to maintain the same level of competition, no space should be left empty (un-planted) inside the trial. Any empty space in the trial whether border row or free space due to non-germination should be planted using some bulk seeds and clearly indicated in the field map.▪ Moisture management: Before imposing drought stress, irrigation intervals need to be well defined so that the crop has optimal moisture conditions for good establishment and growth. If possible, method of irrigation should be combination of furrow/flood and sprinkler system to ensure uniformity in moisture availability across the field, which eventually helps in achieving a uniform drought stress treatment in a field trial. In case of furrow irrigation, it should be ensured that no water stagnated in any part of the field, as this may affect the microclimate or may cause excessive moisture stress. However, drip irrigation is preferred in drought phenotyping trials because of its high precision in achieving uniform moisture level across the field, and therefore uniformity in stress treatment as well.▪ Application of recommended inputs: Recommendations regarding inputs including fertilizers (their time of application and doses), weed, insect-pest and disease control measures are usually location-specific and depend on soil physical and chemical properties and common biotic pressures. Therefore, it is essential to have updated information on the recommended package-ofpractices for the phenotyping site and ensure that they are implemented on time, in order to keep the crop free from nutrient stress and any biotic stresses such as weeds, insects or diseases.▪ Interactions with other stresses: Presence of other biotic or abiotic stress agents that influence plant growth and functions can limit the accuracy of drought phenotyping. These agents may cause mechanical damage to roots (e.g., nematodes, rootworms), impairment of root growth (e.g., soil acidity, boron toxicity, salt stress) and/or reduce water availability to the crop (e.g., presence of weeds, salt stress) and source capacity (e.g. foliar diseases, insect damage to the canopy). Similarly, interactions may occur when evaluation for drought stress is done in presence of other unintended abiotic factors (e.g. low-nitrogen fertility, high or low temperatures etc.).In field-based drought phenotyping trials, it is essential to record weather data (including Tmax, Tmin, relative humidity and rainfall) that could significantly alter the overall effects of drought stress experienced by the crop.A portable weather data recorder should be installed within or in vicinity of the phenotyping field for regular recording of these weather parameters. Apart from directly recorded parameters, vapour pressure deficit (VPD) can be calculated at given air temperature and respective humidity value using the formula given below, and expressed in kPa (kilo Pascal). ▪ Stress timing should be managed such that the targeted growth stage(s) are exposed to the desired level of drought stress.▪ Stress intensity should be severe enough so that important traits for yield under stress become distinct from those, which affect yield under nonstressed conditions. Drought tolerance per se is expected to play a progressively more important role than yield potential as the severity of drought escalates, as genotype ranking for yield changes considerably once the mean yield falls below 20-30 percent of yields under optimal moisture as a result of water scarcity. In general, a drought stress is considered intermediate when mean yield of the drought trial ranges between 40-50 percent of yield under optimal moisture, and severe when it goes down below 30 percent.▪ Stress uniformity over space and time is necessary for expression of genotypic variability within a trial and that could be clearly observed and recorded.There are some key factors that contribute in achieving a desired level of drought stress at targeted crop stage with reasonable uniformity.(a) When to apply last irrigation to impose drought stress?Various methods are available to determine the day of last irrigation for imposing drought stress at targeted crop growth stage, For example -in case of flowering stage drought stress in maize, depends upon soil type (for example -in a medium texture soils), irrigation should be stopped about two weeks before anthesis (Banziger et al., 2000). However, the criteria based on days or weeks might not always be accurate because it is largely dependent on prevailing weather conditions in a particular cropping season/year. Therefore, for improved accuracy there is need of a quantitative criteria such as growing degree-days (GDD) from planting to identify the day of last irrigation for imposing drought stress.For example -in case of a reproductive stage drought trial with medium maturing group of genotypes having GDD for anthesis of approximately 750±25 0 C, and a site with about 10-12 0 C GDD per day during pre-flowering stage, the day when about 550 0 C ∑GDD is reached, is identified appropriate time for applying the last irrigation (Table -1). However, the GDD value for last irrigation is a site and maturity group specific, therefore, this need to be calibrated at least once for a particular phenotyping site and maturity group. An example of how to calculate GDD is given in Annexure-I.Uniformity of last irrigation before imposing drought stress is critical for uniform moisture regime across field, and therefore development of uniform drought stress. The best option for achieving this uniformity is to use drip irrigation system until full saturation. The second best option is sprinkler irrigation system, applied in two instalments; for example: first round of 3-4 hours and after a gap of few hours second round until full saturation. It is difficult to achieve a uniform moisture across field using furrow/flood irrigation at least at this critical stage for drought trials.After applying last irrigation uniformly up to full saturation level all possible sources of water heading towards drought trials should be properly closed, and as a precaution, install a board displaying 'Drought trial or No irrigation' at all possible sides of drought plot (Fig. 4).Table 1 : Accumulation of growing degree days (GDD) and time to apply last irrigation for imposing drought in a medium maturity group of maize hybrid trial at Hyderabad location in India.Some basic precautions for ensuring uniform irrigation using sprinkler system are as below:▪ Irrigation should be done at a time of the day when there is little or no wind.▪ Sprinkler system should be cleaned and checked for leakages.▪ Catch cans should be used to measure the amount of irrigation at places in the field where sprinkler water is expected to be relatively low. If placed systematically in the field, the volume of water collected in the catch cans can be used to adjust the sprinklers for uniformity. (b) Soil moisture profiling:Recording soil moisture data after imposing drought stress helps in regular monitoring of drought development in field and achieving desired level of stress, which eventually helps in generating high quality phenotyping data.The key steps involved in the process are as follows:Installation of soil moisture profile probes: Vertical profiling of soil moisture can be done using a suitable soil moisture profile probes depending on root depth of the crop (For example: Short and long versions of the PR2, with 4 or 6 sensors along the length, Fig. 5, https:// www.delta-t.co.uk/product/pr2/). Porous access tubes (Fig. 6a) need to be installed in field once all mechanical field operations are completed, at least one week prior to applying last irrigation. These tubes are fibre glass specially constructed thin-wall tubes, which maximise the penetration of the electromagnetic field into the surrounding soil. A set of tools are supplied along with equipment for installation of porous tubes in field (Fig. 6b).The tools need to be used as per given guideline for proper installation of each porous tube in a way that full-length of the tube, up to black ring near the top, is inserted into soil (Fig. 6a). Each tube need to be immediately capped properly after installation using rubber cap supplied with tubes (Fig. 6c) so that any object including soil etc. should not fall inside the tubes. The number to be installed in a field depends on the spatial variability in field. Ideally, one tube in each block of experimental design is recommended, or at least one tube in each range (or bed) should be placed following spatial pattern in field (Fig. 7) to optimize moisture depletion data capture across field after imposing drought stress. Recording soil moisture: In deep-rooted crops like maize vertical profiling of soil moisture is done using PR2/6 profile probes. The 1.0m long PR2 probe measures volumetric soil moisture at different depths within the soil profile including 10, 20, 30, 40, 60 and 100 cm depth. It consists of a sealed polycarbonate rod, ~25mm diameter, with electronic sensors as pairs of stainless steel rings arranged at fixed intervals along its length (Fig. 8). Each sensor produce an electromagnetic fields extend into the soil (Fig. 5) and a voltage output, which is converted into soil moisture using a general soil calibrations. The probe needs one-time calibration for specific soil type for a dedicated phenotyping site.For recording soil moisture data the probe is fully inserted into the access tube after removing the cap and after 15-30 second volumetric soil moisture content (m³.mˉ³ or % volume) at different soil depth can be read in data-logger (Fig. 8), which can be manually noted or saved in the data-logger. The moisture reading process in each tube should be repeated at least twice, and average should be used as soil moisture content (m 3 . m -3 or percentage volume) for that particular tube. For second reading in the same tube, take-out the sensor and rotate it to about 90 ○ , again insert it into access tube to repeat the data in same tube.In a drought phenotyping trial moisture data need to be recorded at a regular interval, at least weekly, starting from one week after applying last irrigation, until the stress is relieved or irrigation is resumed. This helps in keeping track with moisture depletion at different soil depth (Fig. 9), progress in drought stress development, and deciding the threshold of drought intensity for terminating stress. Measuring soil water content allows the repetition of such experiment under similar conditions as well as more rigorous assessment and interpretation of the results. It also enables to quantify and document the level of stress applied. (c) When to resume irrigation to terminate drought stress?It is a critical decision to make in order to identify available genotypic variability for drought tolerance.The criteria such as days after imposing drought stress, visible drought stress symptoms in field etc. for terminating the stress are often misleading. A quantitative criteria based on monitoring soil moisture depletion in root zone after imposing drought stress is more reliable in taking decision on termination of stress in a drought trial. For example -stress should be terminated (irrigation resumed) in case of drought phenotyping trial for maize in a medium textured soil (clayey loam), once the soil moisture content at a depth of 30-40cm reached near permanent wiling point (PWP) of the soil (Fig. 9). However, this limit may vary for a particular site and crop, and therefore need to be calibrated at least for one season.Along with soil moisture data, keeping track with accumulated VPD at Tmax after applying last irrigation helps in keeping track with severity of drought stress; For example -in case of maize drought trial at Hyderabad location during winter cycle, a total accumulated VPD ~ 120.0kPa from day after last irrigation to the day of terminating stress was calibrated and used along with moisture depletion data for taking decision on terminating stress. Moisture depletion data supported with VPD information is especially important in some unusual years, when crop encounters a spell of dry wind and a period of prolonged high VPD regime. In such unusual situation, even if moisture content is yet to be depleted to the targeted limit, trial may suffer with severe drought stress due to high VPD regime. Therefore, in such situation VPD criteria helps in taking decision of early termination of drought stress to avoid losing drought trial. VDP data also helps in clustering different sites according to stress pattern and severity before performing across-site data analysis. An example of how to calculate accumulated VPD is given in Annexure-II.The three key steps, i.e.-time of imposing drought stress, monitoring/tracking moisture depletion and terminating the stress at appropriate time, are the key of a successful drought phenotyping trials. Once these steps are implemented based on quantitative criteria discussed in above section, the genotypic variability for drought stress is clearly expressed, which could be recorded in form of high quality data related to various agronomic and yield traits (Fig. 10). Annexure-I ","tokenCount":"3965"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1005041683.json b/data/part_2/1005041683.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5fbd283c573c7fa4a2003a17398470e3334f373b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1005041683.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b8f71977d56de53ded49e2414ed15d65","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/5c720d2e-bb26-4410-be71-c3e9c38346d3/retrieve","id":"-512503471"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"d318d204-bd56-40c4-bbb4-edfb7ba5bbfc","pagecount":"20","content":"Farmers have an intricate koowledge of Iheir agroecological domains. The empirical evidenees from Kachorwa (Ieral) and Begnas (mid-hill) sites in Nepal suggesl that farmers dislinguish domains for rice primarily on Ibe hasis of moislure and fertility. Farrners also differentíale the number, relative size, and specific eharaeteristics of each domrun wíthin a given geographíe area. Símilarly, Ibey allacat. individual varietiesllandraces to each domain, indieatíng lhat the competítion between varietíesllandraces accurs within the domain and Ibat transgression of domain was ralber limited. These deductions need to he verified at a wider level. A fuller understanding by researehers ofspecific agroecologieal domains is a prerequisite ror them to contribute substantíally in planning and executing effective participatory plant breeding (PPB) programs. Only with a sound knowledge of agroecological domains and the varietal distribulion within domains can a program on diversity deployment and biodiversity conservation be effectively implemented. Likewise, justifying Ihe cosl-effectiveness of PPB, targeting researchlexlension activities, and measuring Ihe contribution of PPB to foad security demands a detailed Wlderstanding of agroecological dom.ins. Simple and practical ways lO ilIieit inforro.tion on agroecoJogical dornaios and assaciated varietiesllandraces tbrough farmem' group discussion al Ibe víllage level have been suggested as a pre-projeet activity for PPB, which could enhance Ibe suecess of PPB programs.The importance of agroecological dornams can be found in earlier work on defining and delineating . recornrnendation dornains (RDs), whích is c10sely associated with the farrning systerns research of the late 1970s (Wotowiec, Poats, and Hildebrand 1986). Initial work on RDs concentrated on a few relatively easily identifiable factors (bíological variables), such as land and soil types, agro ecological zones, and erop types and rnanagernent (Harrington and Tripp 1985). The exercise on RD was híghly complex sinee the process was to identify farrning households, based on the sirnilarity in their practiees, rather than farrns. But the delineation of agroecological domains was rnueh less eumbersorne with rice because rice is very sensitive to changes in agroecological conditions and its adaptation is Iirnited, as compared lo sorne other crops such as maíze. Moreover, rice is the rnost important cereal crop in the regíon, so farrners have an in-depth knowledge ofrice-growing environrnents and varieties suitable to different agroecological dornains.The current endeavor on refining the definition of agroecological dornaíns for rice in parts ofNepal is the case of\"sharpening the focus\" fur better targeting of participatory plant breeding (PPB) work, including diversity deployrnent, eonservation of landraees in different dornains, and planning strategic erop rnanagement research. The methodology adopted is quite simple and can be replícated in other areas for wider use by the researchers and deve10pment workers. Field exercises for delineating agroecological domains have largely been influenced by the methodologies on RDs advocated by Collinson (1980), Franzel (1985), and Vaidya and Floyd (1997).Ihey emphasized the use of secondary sources of information, followed by preliminary surveys supplemented later by a formal survey lo refine the domains. However, later views on the subject hold lha! the refining process should take place only after researchers have a clear understanding of the variabílity inherent in the local farming systems (Cornick and Alberti 1985). The current study embodies the thoughts from both the methodologies for delineating domains and associated rice landraces/varieties.In the process of delineating agroecological domains, two group meetings were organized in the Kachorwa and Begnas eco-sítes. The first meeting was held with field-based staff; the second, with farmers from the project area. Ihis was followed by a transect walk by researchers and farmer representatives lo jointly validate farmers' statements. Ihe exercise took about two days, including field visits in each site.Sínce field-based staff are stationed in villages, it was expected !hat they would have a fairly good understanding of the agroecological domains and the farming systems of their respective eco-siles.Hence, the first level of group discussions was organized in field offices, with the field officer, technical assistants, and motivators part.icipating.Afier discussions, the participants were able to come up with four major agroecological domains, mainly defined on the basís of water regímes. They also broadly classified the soíl type and fertility status of soils from each domaín, based on scientific knowledge of soil classification and characterization. Participanls were also asked to estímate the size of each domain and place different landraces/varieties in their right domains. Estimating tbe relative size of each domain was straíghtforward because tbe pok:harilman occupied only a limited area within the eco-site. But placing each landrace/variety in its right domain proved more difficult. The team could place tbe majority of landraces/varieties in their domains, but the number of landraces/varielies per eco-síte was too large for them to rernember aH the names and tbeir right enviromnents. The process was also complicated by the fact lhal sorne of the landraces/varieties are grown in more than one domain.The whole process was reviewed by the participants, and once they were satisfied with the sleps and outputs, the field officer was asked lo facilitate tbe same process for tbe farmers' group discussion.A group discussion was held with farmers witb the specific objective of delineating agroecological domains. Fíeld officers/sile coordinators facilitated the discussion and tbe whole exercise was repeated witb farmers' groups. Both female and male farmers participated in the discussion and put forward tbeir opinions.Farmers identified four agroecological domains within the eco-site (ucha, samta/, nichaJkhalar, and pokharllman), based on the major criteria of moisture regime and fertility status/gradient (tables 1 and 2). They could easily identifY the relative size of each domain, but there were disagreements among about soil c1assification. Perhaps this reflected the variability of the soíl types and soil fertility slatus in each domain. Placing landraces/variety in the domains initiated a lively Having achieved a high degree of agreement between farmers and researchers in Ihe defmition of agroecological domains, it was decided to field-verif)' the definitions through a transect walk and to look for consistency in Ihe field implementation. A representative group offarmers made a transect walk of Ihe eco-site along wilh researchers. They identified domains and located landraces/varieties on different farms. The exercise helped in relating different agroecological domains and Iheir characteristics with Ihé landraceslvarieties being grown Ihere. Thus, Ihis exercise needs to be conducted when the rice crop ls mature or when Ihe crop is standing in Ihe field.Based on the analysis oflhe characteristics of different agroecological domains and Ihe distribution oflandraces/varieties within domains, an attempt lo develop a conceptual model of agroecological domains for rice was made (figure 1). In Ihe following subsections, Ihe characteristíc features of the domains have been explained. Nevertheless, Ihe model needs verification in a larger context and further refinement for wider applicability.Local farmers can provide very reliable inforrnation on Ihe agroecological domains for rice. Similarly, farmers can provide detailed features of each domain in terms of soíl type, drainage, fertility status, production potential, cropping patterns, and so on.The size of agroecological domains varies, with more extreme environments (domains) being relatively smaller as compared to more favorable ones. This follows normal distribution curve. How- Doma!n 4 ever, depending upon fue geographic location (high-potential production systems or marginal growing envíronrnents), the size of each domain will vary. For instance, in marginal environrnents for rice, fue extreme domain will be relatively larger as compared to ofuer domains; whereas, in favorable environrnents, the míddle domains will be relatively larger.Until fue distribution oflandráces/varieties across domains, the features of domains, and fue traits of cultivars are analyzed, one cannot appreciate fue complexity of farroers' strategies to manage plant genetic resourees to meet fueir multiple needs. From the analysis, it is apparent that one landrace/variety is best suited or most competitive in only one domain, though farroers might grow the same cultivar in more fuan one domain. This implies that fue cultivar competes wifu ofuer cultivars trom within the domain, and that there is less competition between cultivars across domains, except when fuere is an overlap of cultivars. Overlap signifies the presence of transitional zones between dornains, which explains fue presence of landraceslvarieties in two different but adjacent dornains. Within dornajns, fue area and number of households growing different landraceslvarieties is explained by rnarket forces, farrocrs' socioeconomic status, cultural factors, preferences for specific traits, and ofuer abiotic and biotjc factors.Alfuough landrsces/varieties rnay overlap in adjacent dornains, no case was registered where a landrsce/variety was found in more fuan two dornajns. This suggests fuat landraces/varietíes have very specific adaptatíons. In ofuer words, it reinforces fue idea that a cultivar is most cornpetítive in only one dornaín.Landraceslvanetíes falling wíthin the sarue domaín are more likely to be similar in their genetic cornposition as cornpared to landraces/varietíes frorn dissimilar dornains. The logic behind is that they have been put under similar managernent condítions have been selected over time fo! adaptation. However, this hypolhesis needs lo be proved from laboratory analysis of sorne of the saruples frorn each domaín. If it proves tme, then there ís a strong case, from a conservation point ofview, for disaggregating genetic materials across agroecologícal domains. Nevertheless, this process still holds true where diversity deployrnent is the prime objective of the project.The distribution oflandraces/vaneties in different domains is the result of farmers' experimentation with those landraces/vaneties over years. In other words, they are the \"best fit\" under farmers' rnanagement conditions. Therefore, researchers definítely need to know the characteristics of each dornain, as well as the specific traits of the landraces/vaneties in each domain and their distribution across dornains in order to make any intervention in the present system. The anaIysis of agroecological domains is worth the money and time invested in collecting and analyzing the information.Planning conservation strategies for landraces ldentifYing landraees that are grown in small areas by a limited number of farrners and devising ways and rneans of conserving them might seem to be a straightforward task for conserving endangered landraces. Sornetirnes, weighted diversity, as well, might be computed for facilitating Ihe decision-makíng process in choosing which landraces to focus on for conservation when there are numerous landraces falling in the endangered category. However, all these processes and steps consider the diversity oflandraces at the aggregatedllandscape (cornmuníty) level and thus ignore the influence of agroecological domains in deterrniníng the position oflandraees in different dornains.The need for micro-Ievel analysis emerges from the faet that landraces are conditioned over years by their continued growth and selection over time in specific dornains. As a result, Ihey have developed adaptive traits, wruch are uníque 10 landraces falling in that domain. Therefore, analysis of landrace diversity at the aggregated level fails 10 appreciate the position oflandraces in specifie dornains, which in faet might be harboring genes of irnportanl traits. Selecting landraces frorn an aggregated list rnight exclude, certaÍn strategically important landraces from conservation.PPB has been used as one rneans 10 conserve useful genes in landraces through crossing with modem vaneties. However, there could be number of landraces withín a domain that might require sorne forrn of conservation (through breeding and nonbreeding means). Understanding Ihe features of domains and the distribution oflandraces in them will facilitate decision rnakíng about selecting landraces for conservation. Failing to do this could result in selecting landraces with similar genetic traits for conservation (vía PPB) from jusI one or two domaÍns. This would lead lo the neglect of sorne and overrepresentation of olhers.Diversity deployrnenl in simple terrn means \"províding farmers wilh options of genetie materials 10 choose frorn.\" The introduction ofnew genetic material results in temporal disequilibrium because of competition between existing and new genetic material. The competition is for space in farmers' fields, for farm labor, for capital inputs, and so on. As time elapses, Ihe new entrant finds its rightful place in Ihe given environment. This is Ihe outcome of farmers constantly tryíng to rnaintain an equilibrium (meeting farmers' objectives) in terms ofstabilizing yield and production over time.The strategy for diversity deployment must begin by analyzing the distribution oflandraces/varieties across agroecological dornains. Once this is done, researchers would have a clear picture of each domain, aIong with the dístríbutíon of landraces/varíeties, and the dominance of certain cultivars against others would becorne evident Researchers would also come to know the reasons for this dominance. Only then could Ihey develop their strategy for diversíty deployrnent. In the absence of this ínformation, new genetic materials míght fit into domains where there is not much cornpetitíon.It could also happen that new genetic rnateríals compete with each other landraceslvarieties in similar domains, resulting in limited impact of diversity deployrnent.The conflict between breeding varíeties for wide adaptability or for ruche environments will perhaps go on. (Wide adaptability rneans Ihe dornain for which the suítability ofthe landrace/variety is large. Niche environment means the domain for the given landrace/varíety is limited.) In Ihe truest sense, wide adaptabilíty should encompass Ihe ability of a cultivar to be grown in several different domains and vice versa for the ruche environment. However, such is not the case.Whatever Ihe case, the proponents of PPB rnust bear in mind that the approach has to prove its worth in terms of chuming out farmer-acceptable varieties efficiently on such a scale that Ihe economic return on investrnent is positive. But this is possible only when researchers have a clear knowledge of the size and characteristics•ofthe dornains the new varíety will fit into. In addition, Ihey also need to know Ihe likely existing cultivar to be replaced Without this inforrnation, it would be rather difficult to estirnate the potential adoption ceiling ofPPB varietíes, which irnplíes that the estimation of economic returns at the household leve! ig difficult. This will becorne an increasingly important issue in the future, when enough time has elapsed between Ihe developrnent and adoptionldissemination of PPB varíeties and Ihe evaluation of their irnpact.Another important issue that can be addressed by analyzing agroecological domains is oríenting PPB programs towards \"poverty aIleviation\" and food securíty at the household leve!. Since resource-poor farmers rnainly own marginalland, Ihere is limited varietal choice. By conducting PPB programs using landraces from marginal environments, the chances of providing greater options in such environments is' increased, which would contríbute to food security, particularly in resource-poor households. Targeting PPB for equity ofbenefits for the resource-poor can also be justified aIong similar lines.Agroecological delineation using key informants/farmers from fue given cornmunity can be reliably done. The identified dornains and the associated varieties in each domain have 10 be verífied through a transect walk with the key informants. This exercise helps príorítize landraceslvaríeties in each domain based on Ihe number ofhouseholds growing them and Ihe area covered. Using lhis information, a selection oflandraces/varieties for PPB work could be made. Diversity deployment and conservatíon of certain landraces/varieties could also be planned using this information. The argurnents presented here clearly índicate the need to focus PPB irutíatives on marginal environments for which Ihere are no MVs, and where, al the same time, the majoríty oflhe resource-poor dwell. This exercise has to be conducted prior to initiating PPB work in a given area. Information required to delineate agroecological domains and associated landraces/varieties can easily be gathered using key informants at the vilIage leve!. It has been suggested that this exercise be incorporated as a component of PPB work.Decisions about the adoption oftechnology are conditional to farmers' perceptions ofthe performance of a new technology relative to that of the technology currently being practiced. Farmers may assess a new technology, such as an improved variety, in terms of a range of attributes, such as grain quality, straw yield, and inpu! requirements, in addition to grain yield (Traxler and Byerlee 1993). In Orissa, eastern India, farmers indicated preference not only for the visual appearance of rice grain, but also for attributes such as cooking quality, taste, keeping quality, and straw quality (Kshirsagar, Pandey, and Bellon 1997). If fimners perceive an improved variety to be inferior to traditional varieties in terms of one or more attributes, they are unlikely to adopt such a variety (Adesina and Zinnah 1993, as cited by Kshirsagar, Pandey, and Bellon 1997). Crop improvement could potentially benefit from farmers' assessments of the relative performance of different varieties under farmer management. Information on the traits desired by farmers and their knowledge of the production system could be invaluable in setting the goals of a breeding program, delineating the target environment, identifying the parents for breeding and defining the management treatment for breeding work (Sperling ・ セ @ al. 1996; Eyzaguirre and Iwanaga 1996).Varietal preferences may differ, not only between socioeconomic groups bu! also by gender.In a farmer-participª1ory breeding (FPB) project on pearl millet in the Jodhpur district, Rajasthan, India, grain yield, early availability of grain, and the case ofharvesting by hand (lower paniele number and lower plant height) were the main considerations for making selections by women. For the men, yield and quality appeared 10 be a stronger eoneern (W' eltzien, Whitaker, and Anders 1996). WhiJe women have traditionally been seed selectors and managers of germplasm in low-input farrning systems, scientists have no! given enough attention to their local knowledge, eriteria for selection, and perceptions regarding new seeds untiJ recently, F or instance, the criteria for selecting seeds, practices of animal care and food processing, and the consequent preferences for different kinds of blending various food materials are useful starting points for building on women'g perspectives in particípatory research (Gupta et al. 1996). Another example is when high labor demands for manual tbreshing may create incentives for women to adopt vaneties that are easier to thresh (Adcsina and Forson 1995). Including women in the early evaluation of varieties ensures that new seeds can be adopted rapidly, Thus, men's and women's entena and preferences for rice vaneties should be well understood and considered in plant-breeding strategies, In March 1997, a farmer-participatory planl-breeding program for raínfed nce was developed at the Intemational Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in collaboration with the Indían Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), This project inc\\udes síx research siles representing different nce ecosystems in eastem India, The project is under the umbrella ofthe CGIAR's Systemwíde Initiative on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis. The goal of this iniliative is to develop, test, and refine methodologies of participatory research and gender analysis as they apply to Ihe development ofnew technologies in germplasm and natural resource management. This FPB projecl aims lo test the hypothesis that farmer particípation in rainfed nce breeding can help develop suilable vaneties more efficiently, It is also designed to identifY the stages in a breeding program where farmer ínterfacing is optimaL The project has two components: the first is a plant-breeding component, whích aíms to develop and evaluate a methodology for participatory improvement of rice for heterogeneous environments, and to produce and improve adoption of matenal suíting farmers' needs. The second is a socÍal-science component (including gender analysis) that aims (1) to characterize cropping systems, diversíty ofvanetíes grown, and the crop-management practices ofrice farmers, (2) to analyze male and female farmers' selection criteria and their reactions to a range of cultivars and breeding lines, and (3). to enhance the capacities of national agricultural research systems (NARS) in participatory research and gender analysis in plant breeding andrice vanetal selection (Courtoís et al. 2000), Thís paper focuses on farmers' selectíon cnteria and their reactions to a range of cultivars and breeding lines UIlder particÍpatory vanetal selection conducted on farmers' fields,The results of the socioeconomic and gender analysÍs in the FPB project includes only two villages (table 1): Mungeshpur in the Faizabad district and Basalatpur in the Siddathnagar district, eastem Vttar Pradesh. These sites are among the research sites UIlder the FPB project. A similar study was conducted in the other FPB research sites in Onssa and Madhya Pradesh, Basalatpur represents favorable (but submergence prone) lowland, rainfed arcas, Mungeshpur represents shallow, submergence-prone areas that are favorably rainfed during years of low rainfalL Basalatpur and Mungeshpur have a rugher proportion of lowland fields (70% and 60%, respectively) with heavier soil and good water-holding capacity, The flow of natural resources like rainwater (field hydrological conditions) tbroughout the season has also had a major impact on vanetal selection in these villages, F armers in Mungeshpur have more access to supplementary irrigation, wruch enables them to diversífY into other crops, partÍCularly vegetables and fodder crops, Only one diesel pump exists ín Basalatpur and trus limits crop diversífication. The importance of livestock between the two villages also differs, Livestock in Mungeshpur is more importan! than in Basalatpur, In Mungeshpur, bullocks continue to be used for Jand preparation, and tbreshing is done manually, In contrast, land preparation and threshing in Basalatpur is mechanized with the use of tractors, The degree of market onentatíon is higher in Basalatpur (nearer the cíty) where more rice is sold, The socioeconomic characteristics of the sample households are shown in table 2, Households are classified by official social categoties of caste. Muslims dominate in Basalatpur (55%), followed by scheduled and back:ward castes. In Mungeshpur, the backward and scheduled castes dominate (89%). The Yadavs, a subcaste ofthe backward caste in Mungeshpur, take care ofmilch animals. The majority ofthe farming households are owner-cultivators, and share cropping is oflimited importance. F emale labor participation in rice production is four times hígher than that of males in Basalatpur and three-fourths in Mungesphur. There is wide disparity in terms of access 10 education between men and women. In general, females have lower literacy rates than meno The differences in resource endowments, socioeconomic status, importance aflivestock, degree ofmarket orientation, gender roles and responsibilities in rice production, and family size may determine the choice of rice varieties/cultivars and agronomic management practices.Rice followed by wheat + mustard is the predominant cropping pattem in al! villages. In BasaIatpur, wheat and oilseed are grown mainly for domestic use, but rice is grown for consumption as welI as marketing. On the other hand, in Mungeshpur, rice 18 mainIy grown for consumption because oflow yields and low marketabIe surplus. Rice is followed by wheat + mustard, which are grown for both domestic consumption and sale. Land preparation for rice is started in June after the arrival afthe monsoon. Transplanting and broadcasting are done in luIy; weeding, in August; and harvesting and threshing, in Oclober to December. During the rabi (dry) season from November to April, crops such as wheat + mustard, peas, grams, lentils, berseem as green fodder, and vegetables are grown. A few farmers, who have their own irrigalion sources, grow crops like mung, maize, vegetables, and green fodder during the zaid season (late April to lune) in Mungeshpur. Growing crops during the rabi and zaid seasons i5 not common in Basalatpur because of the lack of irrigation facilities. The majority of the respondents belong to the lower social class, with small-sized landholdings.Females are younger and have lower literacy rates, compared to males, and have over 20 years of farming experience. The extent of female participation in rice production is high in both villages. Sorne tasks in rice production and postharvest operations are gender specific. Land preparation and the application of chemicals are men's responsibilities in both villages (10% of fertilizer application is done by women in Basalatpur). In Mungeshpur, women from the lower social status dominate in the work of pulling seedlings (100%), transplanting (70%), weeding (80%), applying farrnyard manure (60%), harvesting (82%), and threshing (82%). In Basalatpur, more men than women participate in pulling seedlings and harvesting. Women do the transplanting of seedlings (100%) and most ofthe weeding (75%), with men doing most ofthe spraying (90%). Women are also mainly responsible for postharvest activities such as cleaning and selecting the seeds for the next season, storage, and processing rice into other food products for home consumption and for sale. They are the primary end-users of rice byproducts and biomass for livestock and other farm use. A village study in eastem India revealed that women from the lower castes provided 60% to 80% ofthe total labor input in rice production (Paris et al. 1996). Aside from their significant contributions in rice production, women also provide labor in non-rice crops, collect green animal fodder, and feed and tend Iivestock. Thus, men's and women'g preferences for specifíc traits in rice varieties may differ, based on gender-specific roles and responsibilities. With inereasing male migration lo cities, women are laking on more responsibilities as farm managers, aside from theír normal household and childcare responsibilities (Paris el aL 1996).The rice varieties eurrently grown by farrners are shown in table 3. Traditional varieties are more cornrnon in Basalatpur than in Mungeshpur. Although modern varieties (MVs) show higher adoption rates in Mungeshpur, these varieties ofien suffer from submergenee, drought, and stress al reproduetive and ripening phases when the erop is planted late. Most farrners felt that traditional varieties are more tolerant to drought, submergenee, pests, and diseases, while MV s performed well under irrigated conditions. The majority of the farrners indieated that they felt that MVs needed better management lhan traditionaI varieties. Modero varieties need more labor, higher levels of fertilízer, and more irrigation, but more farmers prefer to grow MV s because of their higher yields. Farrners generally match varieties wíth their environment. For rainfed rice, this means an adaptation to the hydrological conditions of their fields, Each field position in the topo-sequence corresponds to a risk of drought or submergence. The drought risk inercases frorn the bottom to the top of the topo-sequence, while submergence risk decreases along the same path, assocíated with progressively lower water depths and earlier recession of the water. This translates into different ideotypes for the different situations. Table 4 shows varietal diversity according to land type/topography. In Basalatpur, varieties such as Bengalia, Sarya, Oriswa, Kuwari Mashuri, Malwa, and Ghanbhanan are the major traditional rice cultivars grown in the uplands, and Kalamanak, Malasia, Motibaddam, and Malwa are the major varieties grown in the lowlands. Improved varieties, such as NDR-97, PNR-38 1 , and Sarju 52 are grown in the uplands by a few farrners, but the improved variety, Mashuri, occupied more area in the lowlands. In Mungeshpur, the cornrnon local varieties grown on upland fields are Ari, Bagri, 90 days, Sonia, Lalmati, Punjab, Lalbagra, Ashwani, lndrasan, and Bilaspuri. The improved varieties are Saket-4, NDR-80, and NDR-118 in upland and medium fields and Sarju 52, Mashuri, and dwarfMashuri mostly in lowland fields, Medium-duration fields are grown mostly in medium land. Varieties such as Sarju-52. Ashwani. andIndrasan are grownon the fields thatare located in between upper and lower levels oí land type. Fanners of Mungeshpur prefer to grow these varieties on the these land types on the belief that they need optimum moisture during the growth period. Fields dif-in Basalatpur; therefore, sorne farrners prefer to grow medium varieties on upland fields also.To determine whether there are gender differences in perceptions of useful traits in varietal adoption, we used graphic illustrations of traits. We first showed cards that illustrate useful traits in selecting rice varieties. We then asked each farmer what traits he or she consider in selecting rice varieties for specific land types-upland and lowland fields. To assess how farmers valued each trait, we asked the question, \"If you had 100 paisa, how much would you pay for each trait? The value in paisa allocated to a particular trait corresponded to the importance given by the fanner. Because many traÍts are interrelated, we rec1assified them in consultation with a plant breeder. For example, we grouped traits such as ease in hullíng and mílling recovery under postharvest quality. Table 2 shows the seleetion eriteria of male and female fanners for different land types and villages.F avorahle rainfed low/ands (Basalatpur, Siddathnagar district) In the lowland areas in Basalatpur, yield and duratíon are the most important trait5 maJe and female farmers consider in selection rice varieties, In this village, the popular traditional varieties are Bengalía, Oríswa, and Kuwari mashuri. These are short-duration (90-110 days), medium-height varieties, The average yields are 2.5 tons per hectare, Farmers prefer short-duration rice varíeties in the uplands because of the importance of growing early winter crops such as oilseed, linseed, pulses, peas, and potatoes. They prefer to parboil Bengalia; otherwise, its grains break easíly. Women in Basalatpur use traditional rice varietíes for making puffed rice and churra, beaten rice Iike cornflakes .. For women who continue to use the traditional method ofhand-pounding rice, postharvest qualities such as ease ofhulling and mgh milling recovery are additional useful traits. The men did not mention these. The finding that women are more concerned !han men with postharvest traits and milling recovery are similar to the findings in a participatory breeding project in the hígh altitudes in NepaL Sthapít, 10sm, and Wítcombe (1996) also observed that women farmers are particularly skillfuJ in assessing postharvest traits, such as milling recovery, and the cooking and eating quality of rice. They found that the evaluation scores between maJe and femaJe farmers in Chhomrong village showed significant agreement. Women farmers reported ¡hat they would like to decide on varíety selection after the postharvest evaluation. Consumers preferred wmte-grained rice to red-pericarped rice because it saves women time in milling.In Basalatpur, both male and female farmers agreed upon the important traits fo! 10wland rice varieties. Grain price is an important cohsiderlltion for farmers here because they seU traditional varíet-¡es in the market. These, like Kalamanak, command a higher price because oftheir good taste and aroma. Kalamanak gives Iow yields of 1.5 to 2 tons per hectare. In contrast, grain price is not an important consideration in Mungeshpur because rice ís mainly used for home consumption and is seldom sold in the market.In Mungeshpur, both male and female farmers agreed upon important traits in selecting varieties for the uplands. Women gave more importance to postharvest qualities and grain quality such as bold and pure graíns. For the lowlands, both males and females cited better grain yield, medium duration (125-135 days), bioniass, and resistance to abiotic stress as their selection critería for lowland rice varíeties. Women gave greater weight to better adaptation to specific soH types and to grain quality. Women mentioned additional useful traits for varíeties in the uplands and lowlands that were not mentioned by men: competitiveness with weeds and postharvest quality. Weeds are the major problem in the uplands, particularly when rice is direct-seeded. In the lowlands, weeds are more prevalent during drought. These additional traits are related to the roles and responsibilities of female farnily members (e.g., hand weeding and feeding rice straw to livestock).During the 1999 monsoon season, two farmers from each of the villages of Mungeshpur and Saríyawan (rainfed neighboring village) ofthe Faizabad district and from Basalatpur were selected to check the performance of rice genotypes in their fields. The genotypes were (1) advanced lines from a shuttle breeding project from Uttar Pradesh, (2) released varieties, and (3) the most common local varieties. Of the 14 genotypes screened in Basalatpur, two are scented varíetíes (Kamini, which flowers in 136 days, and Sugandha, which flowers in 124 days). Scientists distributed the seeds through the FPB project. In this approach, breeders select the most promising lines with farmers, and farmers are given a \"basket of choices,\" growing several genotypes in their specific environments.Ten farmers (five women and five men) visited the individual plots and ranked the rice genotypes grown on farmers' fields past the maturity stage. Farmers were asked to rank the rice lines from I (exceIlent) to 14 or 16 (worst) on the basis ofvisual assessment. The rankings ofthe new cultivars by the farmers generated an n x k matrix, where n equals the lines being evaluated and k equals the farmers evaluating the crop performance. KendaIl's Coefficient ofConcordance (W) was used to measure the agreement in rankings arnong male farmers and among female farmers, and the correlation between male and female farmers' rankings. High and significant correlation values indicate cIose agreement on the ranking of the rice genotypes by men and women in the sample.Tables 5a to 5d show that in the two villages, male and female evaluators were in cIose agreement in the ranking ofthe lines. The Ws were highly significant, revealing that farmers' and breeders' rankings are ofien acceptable. Table 6 shows the surnmary of the ranking of male farmers, female farmers, and plant breeders indicating their choices. Ofthe 14 and 16 varieties ranked in Basalatpur and Mungeshpur, PVS 1, PVS3, PVS7, PVS9, PVSlO, and PVSI5 carne out as the farmers' and breeders' choices in 1999. The traits of these lines are shown on table 7. During the crop season in 2000, several ofthese lines were compared with local check through PVS. Twenty-three farmers in two villages in Faizabad grew three rice lines, while 50 farmers in six villages in Siddathnagar grew six rice lines obtained from PVS trials. ","tokenCount":"5385"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1022170647.json b/data/part_2/1022170647.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..053bce895ea0b518aaa094e3e33d7b0175fffbe2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1022170647.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e5742e2a742f88e66327e1ccb35d4d35","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/fe8d8ab9-4289-4130-a36e-27d6bd29e42c/retrieve","id":"1935589402"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"29bb707c-5d2d-4d35-8436-6ad2af50af40","pagecount":"7","content":"iotechnology has transformed many parts of the chemical industry, agriculture, and medicine. This area of science has little demarcation between basic and applied research, and new discoveries and innovations, in most cases, can find direct application. Innovations, techniques, and tools that have emerged and revolutionized modern biotechnology include genetic engineering, cell fusion technology, bioprocess technologies, and structure-based molecular designs including drug development, drug targeting, and drug delivery systems.In the 1980s the Government of India considered the need for creating a separate institutional framework to strengthen biology and biotechnology research in the country. Scientific agencies supporting research in modern biology included:Basic research is essential on all aspects of modern biology including development of the tools to identify, isolate, and manipulate the individual genes that govern the specific characters in plants, animals, and microorganisms. Recombinant DNA (rDNA) technology is the basis for these new developments. The creativity of the scientists and the basic curiosity-driven research will be the keys to future success. India led through the work of G.N. Ramachandran, in which he elucidated the triple helical structure of collagen. The Ramachandran plot has proven to be fundamental in solving the protein structure. Areas of biosystematics using molecular approaches, mathematical modeling, and genetics including genome sequencing for human beings, animals, and plants, will continue to have priority as we move into the next century. The tremendous impact of genome sequencing is increasingly evident in many fields. As an increasing number of new genes are discovered, short, unique, expressed sequenced tags segments are used as signatures for gene identification. The power of high throughput sequencing, together with rapidly accumulating sequenced data, are opening new avenues in biosciences.In the plant genome area, the sequencing of Arabidopsis and rice genome will soon be completed and cataloging and mapping of all the genes will be done.There have been major achievements in basic bioscience in the last decade or so in India, where we have expertise in practically all areas of mod-Manju Sharma ern biology. The institutions under the CSIR, ICMR, ICAR, DST, and DBT have established a large number of facilities where most advanced research work in biosciences is being done. In the identification of new genes, development of new drug delivery systems, diagnostics, recombinant vaccines, computational biology, and many other related areas, considerable success has been achieved. Breakthroughs include studies on the three-dimensional structure of a novel amino acid, a long protein of mosquito (University of Poona), and demonstration of the potential of the reconstituted Sendai viral envelops containing only the F protein of the virus, as an efficient and site-specific vehicle for the delivery of reporter genes into hepatocytes (Delhi University).The post Green Revolution era is almost merging with the gene revolution for improving crop productivity and quality. The exploitation of heterosis vigor and development of new hybrids including apomixis, genes for abiotic and biotic resistance, and developing planting material with desirable traits and genetic enhancement of all important crops will dominate the research agenda in the next century. Integrated nutrient management and development of new biofertilizers and biopesticides would be important from the view-point of sustainable agriculture, soil fertility, and a clean environment. Stress biology, marker-assisted breeding programs, and studying the important genes will continue as priorities. We will have to switch to organic farming practices, with greater use of biological software on a large scale.In India we have achieved the cloning and sequencing of at least six genes, developed regeneration protocols for citrus, coffee, mangrove species, and new types of biofertilizer and biopesticide formulations, including mycorrhizal fertilizers. Research to develop new genetically improved (transgenic) plants for brassicas, mung bean, cotton, and potato is well advanced. Industries have also shown a keen interest in the options of biotechnology and are participating in field trials and pilot level productions. The successful tissue culture pilot plants in the country, one at TERI in New Delhi and the other at NCL in Pune are now functioning as Micropropagation Technology Parks. This has given a new direction to the plant tissue culture industry. The micropropagation parks serve as a platform for effective transfer of technology to entrepreneurs, including training and the demonstration of technology for mass multiplication of horticulture and trees. Considerable progress has been made with cardamom and vanilla, both important crops. Yield of cardamom has increased 40 percent using tissue-cultured plants.Between 1996 and 1998, in just eight countries, the area covered by new genetically improved transgenic plants (from 16.8 to 27.8 million hectares) (James 1998). Some of the main crops grown are soybean, corn, canola, cotton, and potato. The United States, Argentina, Brazil, and China have moved ahead quickly. The new plants exhibited herbicide, insect, and viral resistance, and overall improvement in product quality.While the Green Revolution gave us self-reliance in food, the livestock population has provided a \"White Revolution,\" with 80 percent of the milk in India coming from small and marginal farms. This has had a major social impact. A diverse infrastructure has been established to help farmers in the application of embryo transfer technology. The world's first IVF buffalo calf (PRATHAM) was born through embryo transfer technology at the National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal. Multiple ovulation and embryo transfer, in vitro embryo production, embryo sexing, vaccines and diagnostic kits for animal health have also been developed. Waste recycling technologies that are cost effective and environmentally safe, are being generated. The animal science area is also opening up many avenues for employment generation.With a coastline of more than 8,000 kilometers, and two island territories of Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, there is great potential for marine resource development and aquaculture. To achieve an annual target production of 10 million metric tons of fish, scientific aquaculture offers great possibilities. In fact, aquaculture products are among the fastest moving commodities in the world. We have to continuously improve seed production, feed, health products, cryopreservation, genetic studies, and related environmental factors. This is an area which will help substantially in the diversification of the breadbasket, and in combating nutritional deficiency.Food security is another area in which biotechnology offers major inputs for healthier and more nutritious food. Millions of people are malnourished, and Vitamin A deficiency affects 40 million children. There are also serious deficiencies of iodine, iron, and other nutrients. A recent UNICEF report on food and nutrition deficiencies in children describes this as a \"silent, invisible emergency with no outward sign of a problem.\" Every year over 6 million children under the age of 5 die worldwide. About 2.7 million of these children die in India. More than half of these deaths result from inadequate nutrition.With the advent of gene transfer technology and its use in crops, we hope to achieve higher productivity and better quality, including improved nutrition and storage properties. We also hope to ensure adaptation of plants to specific environmental conditions, to increase plant tolerance to stress conditions, to increase pest and disease resistance, and to achieve higher prices in the marketplace. Genetically improved foods will have to be developed under adequate regulatory processes, with full public understanding. We should ensure the safety and proper labeling of the genetically improved foods, so consumers will have a choice.It is scientifically well established that an environmentally benign way of ensuring food security is through bioengineering of crops. For the 4.6 billion people in developing countries, one billion do not get enough to eat and live in poverty. Is there any other strategy or alternative? Biotechnology will provide the new tools to breeders to enhance plant capacity. Since we know that 12 percent of the world land is under agricultural crops, it is projected that the per capita availability may be reduced from 2.06 hectares to 0.15 hectare by 2050.With more than 47,000 species of plants and two hot-spots of biodiversity, 8 percent of the total biodiversity of the earth is available in the Indian subcontinent. The bioresource and biodiversity constitute the mainstay of the economy of the poor people, and special emphasis is required for plant biotechnology research. Isolation of genes for abundant proteins, combining molecular genetics and chromosome maps, and a much better understanding of the evolutionary relationship of the members of the plant kingdom, have led to the potential of plant species being the major source of food, feed, fiber, medicine, and industrial raw material. Molecular fingerprinting and areas of genomics and proteonics will penetrate the barriers of fertilization to allow transfer of important characters from one plant to another. By identifying appropriate determinants of male sterility, we can extend the benefit of hybrid seeds to more crops. We must help the farmer by ensuring hybrid vigor generation after generation. Additional research on apomixis would open up such possibilities.We have set up a National Plant Genome Research Centre at Jawaharlal Nehru University. A number of centers for plant molecular biology in different parts of the country were initially responsible for training significant numbers in crop biotechnology. There are innumerable possibilities of producing more proteins, vitamins, pharmaceuticals, coloring material, bioreactors, production of edible vaccines, therapeutic antibodies and drugs. Promising leads are available in these areas, and a number of genetically improved crops are ready for field trials of transgenic plants. Work on developing transgenic cotton, brassica, mung bean, and potato has significantly advanced.A special area of global concern amongst the scientific community is environmental protection and conservation, and the need for a policy of sustainable development in harmony with the environment. The Stockholm Conference in 1972, and the UNCED Conference in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, both focused world attention on areas of pollution, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable development. Plants and microbes are becoming important factors in pollution control. World Bank estimates show that pollution in In-dia is costing almost US$80 billion, as well as the human cost in terms of sickness and death. New developments such as bioindicators, phytoremediation methods, bioleaching, development of biosensors, and identification and isolation of microbial consortia are priority research areas. Significant work has been done in India, but developing a more biologically oriented approach towards pollution control would be extremely important. Cleaning up the large river systems and ensuring the destruction of pesticide residue in large slums in the city are priorities in which a biotechnological approach would be environmentally safe.Phytoremediation to remove the high levels of explosives found in the soil has become a reality. Although it was known that some microbes can denitrify the nitrate explosives in the laboratory, they could not thrive on site. French and others (1999) have transferred this degradative ability from the microbe to tobacco plants, and these have produced a microbial enzyme capable of removing the nitrates.The global biosphere can survive only if resource utilization is about 1 percent and not 10 percent. The global environment is regulated by climate changes and biosphere dynamics. Knowledge about biodiversity accumulated in the last 250 years is being used by scientists throughout the world. There are many gene banks, botanical gardens, and herbaria for conservation purposes. There are also molecular approaches including DNA fingerprinting for plant conservation. The totality of gene species and ecosystems has become exceedingly important, not only to understand the global environment but also from the viewpoint of the enormous commercial significance of the biodiversity.Biotechnology is becoming a major tool in conservation biology. Twelve percent of the vascular plants are threatened with extinction. Over 5,000 animal species are threatened worldwide, including 563 Indian species. India also has about 2000 species of vascular plants that are threatened.Biodiversity is under threat, and understanding the scale of this destruction and extinction is essential. Questions such as who owns the biodiversity, who should benefit from it, and what is the role of society and the individual are pertinent. There is a Kashmiri proverb that says: We have not inherited the world from our forefathers, we have borrowed it from our children.More research is needed on forests, marine resources, bioremediation methods, restoration ecology, and large-scale tree plantations. The last has reached 180 million hectares and may increase substantially in the next decade. Marine resources provide many goods and benefits including bioactive materials, drugs, and food items and must be characterized and conserved.A major responsibility of biotechnologists in the 21st century will be to develop low-cost, affordable, efficient, and easily accessed health care systems. Advances in molecular biology, immunology, reproductive medicine, genetics, and genetic engineering have revolutionized our understanding of health and diseases and may lead to an era of predictive medicine. Genetic engineering promises to treat a number of monogenetic disorders, and unravel the mystery of polygenetic disorders, with the help of research on genetically improved animals. Globally, there are about 35-40 biotechnology-derived therapeutics and vaccines in use and more than 500 drugs and vaccines in different stages of clinical trials.Every year about 12 million people die of infectious diseases. The main killers according to WHO are acute respiratory infection, diarrheal diseases, tuberculosis, malaria, hepatitis, and HIV-AIDS. There are vaccines being developed for many diseases, and diagnostic kits for HIV, pregnancy detection, and hepatitis are being developed. The technologies have been transferred to industry.The Department of Biotechnology has developed guidelines for clinical trials for recombinant products, which have now been accepted by the Health Ministry and circulated widely to industry. Promising leads now exist to develop vaccines for rabies, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, cholera, JEV, and other diseases. Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine and LEPROVAC are already on the market. There is a Jai Vigyan technology mission on the development of vaccines and diagnostics. A National Brain Research Centre is being established to improve knowledge of the human brain and the brain diseases.The discovery of new drugs and the development of the drug delivery system are increasingly important. Bioprospecting for important molecules and genes for new drugs has begun as a multi-institutional effort. A recombinant vaccine for BCG and hepatitis is being developed. The age-old system of Ayurveda practiced in India needs to be popularized and made an integral part of health care. The global market for herbal products may be around US$5 trillion by 2050.Advances in biotechnology can be converted into products, processes, and technologies by creating an interdisciplinary team. The pharmaceutical sector has had a major impact in this field, as rare therapeutic molecules in the pure form become available. Diagnostics have expanded, with over 600 biotechnology-based diagnostics (valued at about US$20 billion worldwide) now available in clinical practice. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based diagnostics are the most common. Indian efforts in the diagnostic area have been commendable, and it is expected that sales will rise from about US$235 million to US$470 million in the next century.The consumption of biotechnology products is expected to increase from US$6.4 billion to about US$13 billion by 2000. Industrial enzymes have emerged as a major vehicle for improving product quality. In India a number of groups are gearing up to produce industrial enzymes such as alpha-amylose, proteases, and lipases, increasing three-fold by the end of the century, which will match or surpass the computer industry in size, importance, and growth. India is now producing 13 antibiotics by fermentation. Capacity exists to produce important vaccines such as DPT, BCG, JEV, cholera, and typhoid. Cell culture vaccines such as MMR and rabies, and hepatitis-B, have also been introducedThe coming together of biotechnology and informatics is paying rich dividends. Genome projects, drug design, and molecular taxonomy are all becoming increasingly dependent on information technology. Information on nucleotides and protein sequences is accumulating rapidly. The number of genes characterized from a variety of organisms and the number of evolved protein structures are doubling every two years. DBT has established a national Bioinformatics Network with ten Distributed Information Centres (DICs) and 35 sub-DICs. A Jai Vigyan Mission on establishment of genomic databases has been started, with a number of graphic facilities created throughout the country. This system has helped scientists involved in biotechnology research.The bioethics committee of UNESCO established in 1993 has evolved guidelines for ethical issues associated with the use of modern biotechnology.Biosafety guidelines for genetically improved organisms (GIOs) need to be strictly followed to prevent harm to human health or the environment. A three-tier mechanism of Institutional Biosafety Committees has been instituted in India: the Review Committee on Genetic Manipulation, the Genetic Engineering Approval Committee, and the state level coordination committees. It is important to give a clear explanation of the new biotechnologies to the public to allay their fears. New models of cooperation and partnership have to be established to ensure close linkages among research scientists, extension workers, industry, the farming community, and consumers.Gene transformation is done worldwide with four broad objectives: (a) to develop products with new characteristics; (b) to develop pest and disease resistance; (c) to improve nutritional value; and (d) to modify fruit ripening to obtain longer shelf life. Thus the aims and objectives are laudable and the tools are available. The new technology does, however, call for a cautious approach following appropriate biosafety guidelines.About 25,000 field trials of genetically modifed crops have been conducted worldwide. The anticipated benefits are better planting material, savings on inputs, and genes of different variet-ies can be introduced in the gene pool of crop species for their improvement. The potential risks include weediness, transgene flow to nontarget plants, and the possibility of new viruses developing with wider host range and their effects on unprotected species. For crops such as corn and cotton with single gene introductions, there is very little problem expected. When multiple genes are involved scientists have to be more cautious.The time has arrived for a serious look at ethical and biosafety aspects of biotechnology. Researchers, policymakers, NGOs, progressive farmers, industrialists, government representatives, and all concerned players need to come together and share a platform to address the following issues. There are about 50 approved MS, postdoctoral, and MD training programs in biotechnology in progress or just about to start, in different institutions and universities covering most Indian States. Short-term training programs, technician training courses, fellowships for students to go abroad, training courses in Indian institutions, popular lecture series, awards, and incentives form an integral part of the human resource development activities in India. A special feature of the program has been that since 1996 many students after completion of their training course join industries or work in biotechnology-based programs in institutions and laboratories. National Bioscience Career Development Awards have been instituted. Special awards for women scientists and scholarships to the best students in biology help promote biotechnology in India and give recognition and reward to the scientists.Biotechnology-based activities to benefit the poor and weaker sections and programs for women have been launched. A unique feature is the es-tablishment of a Biotechnology Golden Jubilee Park for Women which will encourage a number of women entrepreneurs to take up biotechnology enterprises that benefit women in particular. This will also encourage women biotechnologists to develop relevant technologies.States are taking a keen interest in developing biotechnology-based activities. The States of Uttar Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Kerala, West Bengal, Jammu and Kashmir, Haryana, Mizoram, Punjab, Gujarat, Meghalaya, Sikkim and Bihar have already started large-scale demonstration activities and training programs.The Indian Government has made substantial investments in biotechnology research. Bringing Indian biotechnology products to market will require the involvement of large and small entrepreneurs and business houses. This will require substantial investments from Indian and overseas investors. The worldwide trend is that large companies are becoming major players in development of biotechnology products, and also in supporting product-related biotechnology research.In the years ahead, biotechnology R&D should produce a large number of new genetically improved plant varieties in India, including cotton, rice, brassicas, pigeonpea, mung bean, and wheat. Tissue culture regeneration protocols for important species such as mango, saffron, citrus, and neem will lead to major commercial activities. Micropropagation technology will provide high-quality planting materials to farmers. Environment-friendly biocontrol agents and biofertilizer packages will hopefully be made available to farmers in such a way that they can produce these in their own fields. The country should be in a position to fully utilize, on a sustainable basis, medicinal and aromatic plants. The development through molecular biology of new diagnostic kits and vaccines for major diseases would make the health care system more efficient and cheaper. Genetic counselling clinics, molecular probes, and fingerprinting techniques should all be used to solve the genetic disorders in the population. The establishment of ex situ gene banks to conserve valuable germplasm and diversity, and a large number of repositories, referral centers for animals, plants, and microorganisms should be possible. Detailed genetic readouts of individuals could be available. Information technology and biotechnology together should become a major economic force. It is expected that plants as bioreactors would be able to produce large numbers of proteins of therapeutic value, and many other important items. The recent discovery of the gene for recalcitrant species was a landmark event. In vitro mass propagation can be carried out on any desired species with nonrandom programming. Certainly the 21st century could witness a major increase in new bioproducts generated through modern biology.To achieve the goal of self-reliance in this field, India will require a strong educational and scientific base, clear public understanding of the value of new biotechnologies, and involvement of society in many of these biological ventures. India has a large research and educational infrastructure comprising 29 agriculture universities, 204 central and state universities, and more than 500 national laboratories and research institutions. It should therefore be possible to develop capabilities and programs so that these institutions act as regional hubs for the farming com-munity, where they can get direct feedback about new technological interventions. It will be equally important to establish strong partnerships and linkages with industry, from the time a research lead has emerged until the packaging of the technology and commercialization are achieved. Arther Kornberg, Nobel Laureate, stated: \"Much has been said about the future impact of biotechnology on industrial development, but this does not yet apply to the less developed countries that lack this infrastructure and industrial strength. In view of the current power of biotechnology and its even brighter future, there is no question that the less developed countries must now position and strengthen their status in biotechnology.\"Kornberg further stressed that :\"What a tragedy it would be if these enlarged concepts of genetics, biology and chemistry were available only to a small fraction of the world population located in a few major centres of highly developed countries.\"","tokenCount":"3706"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1038290795.json b/data/part_2/1038290795.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9f621016623f758c4c4bbb2364a3260c400b40e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1038290795.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"8749f82e757c0703bac963f11688f9ac","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/80c17398-4db0-4056-bde1-b38d5c89d3c5/retrieve","id":"573187296"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"f36489ab-b28f-421e-ab3b-edefd96b2e00","pagecount":"30","content":"I MPCRTANCIA E CON OMICA P ág i na A . D efinición B . Causas de la apar i ción de altas poblaciones de larvas * EVALUAC I ON TERCERA PARTE 111. METODOS DE CONTROL A. Neces ldad d el control integrado B . M étodos de control utilizacbs en el combate de Erinnyis ello • 1 . Cultural 2. Mecánico 3 . Qu(rnico 4 . Biológico EVALUACI ON 14 15 16 CUARTA PARTE Página IV . EL CO\\ITROL BIOLOGICO DE Erinnyis ello A. Control biológico mediante insectos 1. Parás itos de huevos 2. Pa r ásitos de larvas 3. Predatores de larvas B. Control biológico rr:ediante microorganismos C . Control biológico mediante vertebrados D. El control biológico como componente del control • integrado EVALUACION QU INTA PARTE v. RESUMENLa yuca (Manihot escu\\enta Crantz) es una de las especies vegetales que posee una alta c apacidad de producción de ca rboh idratos. La facilidad de cult1vo en reg1ones tropicales la ha conve r tido en una de las principales fuentes de carbohidratos para los habitantes de dichas regiones.E s por ello que actualmente se com ienza a reconocer su gran potencial no sólo para cubr1r el défi ci t calóri co que padece una g r an parte de la población, s1no tamb1én para su utilización en la alimentación animal y para su procesamiento agro1ndustr1a l.Por ser una planta perenne, la yuca se ve afectada por una g r an cantidad de plagas, entre las cuales se destacan principalmente los tri ps , l os á ca ros , el gusano cachón y los barrenadores del tallo . El incr emento del área cultivada y el uso indiscriminado de insec ti cidas han alte r ado el equilibrio ecológico en las poblaciones insecti les en muchas r egiones , dando lugar a que algunos insectos que antes aparecran esporádicamente (plagas secundar1as) se conviertan en plagas causantes de daños de importancia econ6m1ca.Uno de ellos es Er1rv1yis ello, llamado com6nmente gusano c a chón, el cual causa severos daños especialmente en p lantas jóvenes , encontrándose en \\a mayorra de las zonas yuqueras del continente americano. Esta plaga se caractertza por su alta capacidad de consumo foliar, sobre todo en los 61timos estadios de su fase larval. Por esta razón, al p r esentarse en alta s poblac iones puede defoliar total mente la planta e incluso consumi r la parte tierna del tallo y las yemas late ral es.Cuando Erinnyls ello se presenta en a l tas poblaciones se convierte en plaga de importancia económica , sobre todo si ataca plantaciones jóve nes , siendo necesario controlarlo para evitar reducciones ap r ec iabl es e n e l r endimiento. El control del gusano cac hón puede efectuarse a través d e varios métodos: cultural, mecánico , quCmico y biológico .PRIMERA PARTE 1, BIOLOGIA DE Erinnyi s e llo (Lepid6ptera: Sphingidae) A. Adulto El ciclo biológico completo de Erinnyis ello (Fig. 1) dura aproximadamente entr e 33 y 55 d(as, según las condiciones ambientales .El adulto es una mariposa de hábitos nocturnos con una coloración grisácea o marrón.Generalmente presenta unas 5 ó 6 bandas negras en el abdomen. Las alas anteriores son de color gris , mient ras que las posteriores pueden presentar una c oloración rojiza; las primeras pueden medir de 34 a 48 mil(met r os.Por lo general, los machos son más pequeños que las hembras, de color más oscuro y presentan una banda negra longitudinal en las alas superio res.La hembra adulta puede vtvtr de 5 a 7 d(as, y los machos unos d(as menos, aun cuando se tienen informes de que algt.r~os adultos pueden vivir hasta 25 d(as en condiciones normales. La copulación ocurre comúnmente durante la noche, en las primeras 24 horas después de la emergencia de los adultos. La oviposición se inicia uno o dos dras después de la cópula , y tiene lugar sobre la haz de la hoja , aunque puede ocurri r también sobre el envés o incluso sobre e l pecro lo y los tallos .L os huevos de Erinnyis ello son redondos, miden de 1 a 1 ,5 miHmetros de diámetro , y generalmente son puestos individualmente. El total de huevos que el adulto oviposita dur ante toda su vida var(a entre 30 y 50 .Los huevos presentan una coloración verdosa inicial que se torna amarillenta a las 24 hor as.La eclosión de los huevos ocurre 4 6 5 d(as después de la oviposición .C . Larva L a etapa larval tiene una duración d e 12 a 15 d ras , dependiendo de las ccndi ciones c limáticas .La larva pasa por ctnco ins tares , con cuatro carobios o mudas de piel, a través de los c uales va aumentando de tamaño hasta alcanzar una longitud de aproxtmadamente 1 O a 1 2 cent(metros .Estas larvas se caracterizan por tener un cuerno caudal erecto , d e mayor tamaño durante los primeros estadios, de donde proviene su nombre de cachón (cachudo, en otros par-: ses) .Es dur ante esta etapa l a r val cuand o Erinnyis ello ocasiona daño a las plantas de yuca , y muestra tal voracidad que puede con sumi r hasta 11 dec fmetro s cuad r ados de superficie folia r; un 75 por ciento del consumo o cu rre durante el último estad i o.Tal como lo señaláramos e n \\a mtroctucci6n , l a larva de Erinnyi s ello es polffaga , y puede al im entarse de rnt.s de 35 especies diferentes , pertenec i entes prmcipalmente a l a s familias E uphor-b iaceae , Car icaceae y So l a n aceae . Vale la pena destacar e l hecho de que apr-oximadamente el 75 por c i ento de estas especies p r esentan l a t ex .Otro asp ecto inte r esante de l a etapa l arval d e Erinnyis ello es su marcada dtferencia de color: pueden se r verdes , ama r-i llas , anaranjadas , marrones , gris oscuro, neg r as o vetead as de rojo y negr-o.E sta va r iabil idad en el color de la l arva par ece depender d e factor es tales como l a aglomer ación de larvas en l a planta , la calidad del alimento consumido , l as condiciones el imát tcas y otros factor es desconocidos .D espués de haber compl etado sus ci nco e s tadios , la l a r va baja al suelo y se esconde debajo de residuos u hojas ca fdas , en donde pasa por un perfocto d e prepupa que d u ra apr oxi m adamente d os d[as , durante l os cuales no consume ning6n alimento , tiene poca movilidad y fina lmente empupa . L a pupa es de col o r marrón osc uro y puede medi r hasta 45 mil [metr os de l argo por 1 O de ancho .Tiene una durac i6n de ap roximadamente 1 5 a 30 dfas ; en algunos casos , cua ndo las condicion es ambiental es no l e son favor ables , l a pupa puede permanecer e n e l suel o dur ante var-ios meses en un estado de latencia denominado diapausa.Para fines de control, los estados más impor-ta ntes son l os de huevo y l a r va , por cuanto los enem i gos naturales de la plaga la atacan en alguno de Pupa:Se considera que un insecto se convierte en plaga de importancia económica cuando su población es tan alta como para producir daños que disminuyen apr eciablemente el rendimiento del cultivo. En el caso de Erinnyis ello , es conveniente saber cuárdo y por qu~ la aparición del insecto adquiere importancia econ6rnica.Hab(amos dicho que e l gusano cachón provocaba daños a la pl a nta de yuca al consum ir grandes cantidades de follaje y que, al presentarse en altas poblaciones poora defoliar totalmente las plantas y causar la muerte de algunas d e ellas ll egardo , en algunos casos , a consum ir las yemas y las partes tiernas del tallo. (Fig. 2) Fig. 2. Defoliación total de plantas de yuca debida a un ataque severo de ~. ~ll..!>..! L a intensidad del ataque va rra seg6n ta edad de la planta. El gusano puede apar ece r tempranam ente , en cuyo caso es muy p r obable que ocurran d a ños de cons id e r ación sobr e todo si hay una atta población de larvas . L a d efoliac ión provocada po r el ataque de Erinnyi s ello entre tos dos y tos seis meses puede causa r dismin uciones en el r endimiento del orden d e l 1 O a l 50 p o r ciento .D esp uás d e t os 6 m eses de edad , la plantación se ve poco afectada por la defoliación , habiéndose comprobado experimentalmente que defoliaciones del o rd en d el 40 y a6n del 80 por e iento no afecta n el rend imiento de las plantas. Por ello, es posible concl uir que el gusano cachón s6to tiene impo r tanc ia económica cuando aparece en plantaciones de menos de 6 meses ; en estos casos es necesa ri o apt icar métodos de contr ol que permitan r educi r l a població n de larvas r ápida y eficientemente .B. Causas de la apar ición de alta s poblacio nes de larvas Una población de l arvas capaz de c ausar daños severos a plantaciones jóvenes puede aparecer debido a alguna de tas siguientes c ausas:-Atta movilidad del adulto . Como ta s mar iposas son capaces de votar grandes distancias, pueden migra r de una región a otra alterando e l equilibrio biológico ex iste nte entre t a población de d icha plaga y sus enemigos naturales . En algunos casos de ataques severos se han encontrado hasta 90 larvas por planta , ocasionand o la defoliación total, e incluso l a mue r te de algunas de las plantas .-Las variaciones mar cadas e n las condiciones climáticas, especialmente al comenzar o final izar tos per[odos de H uvia.-El uso indiscriminado de insecticidas para combatir otras plagas , el cual p uede p r ovocar una dism i nución en la poblaci ón de tos enemigos naturales del gusano cachón permitiendo por consiguiente , que una mayor cantidad d e huevos c ontin6e su c icl o nor mal y dé origen a una atta pobl ación de larvas .Defina e l concept o de plaga .11.E n qul! consiste e l daño causado por las l a r vas de E. e llo a las plantas d e yuca? Es igua l en plantas jóvenes y en-p l antas viejas? De no ser as ( , cuál es l a dife rencia?Enu mere l as causas d e la apa rición de a ltas poblaciones de larvas de E . ello capaces de c ausar reducciones en el rendimiento.1.3 .TERC ERA PARTEA. Necesidad de un control integr ado C uando 1.1'1 insecto apa re c e en poblaciones altas , capaces de causar daños que provoquen disminuciones apreciables en los rendimientos , se hace necesario aplicar algunos de los métodos de c ontrol conocidos para el combate de plagas . Desafortunadamente la mayorra de las plagas insect iles son adversar tos ver sáttles y cambiantes , capaces d e adaptarse a su h uésped, a su medio ambiente y a l os m étodos de control . Aún con los grandes avan--ces en l as investigaciones relacionadas con s u repres i ó n, el hombre no puede espera r un control pe rfecto , ni muc ho menos la err adicación de un número s ustanci al de plagas , as( que e s necesario aprender a convivir con e ll as.Exis te una gran variedad de métodos d e control, con dife r entes n iveles de e fi c iencia y e cono m(a, per o ninguno ha l ogr ado una soluc i ón sati sfactoria y duradera a los múltiples problemas caus ados por las plagas , los cual es han a umentad o acel e r adamente du r ante las últimas décadas demos trando c larament e que e l enfoque unil ater a l del control de plagas e s inadecuado .Para el caso del gusano cachón, pod emos mencionar cuatr o posibles m étodos d e control: cultural , mecánico, qu(mi co y biológico. Lo ideal ser(a un control int egra do basado en el uso de l os cuatro métodos a nte rio r e s en fo r ma s incron izada y oportuna para l ograr mantener la pobl ación ins ectil a niveles que no caus en daños de importancia económica . (Fig . 3)El obje to de este método es modificar la s condic iones natural es favo r ables a la plaga , mediante el empleo de p rácticas c ulturales . En el caso d e Erinnyi s e llo se r ecomienda a r ar inmediatamente de s pués de la cosecha con e l objeto d e enter r ar p r ofundament e las pupas y de es ta manera eliminarlas , Otr a práctica cultura l recomendada es eliminar las m a lezas, especialmente las eufor biác eas , presentes en l a plantación o en s us alrededores , las c uales s irven d e hospedantes a la plaga .En e l c aso de ataques continuos del gusano cachón en una z ona se r ecom ienda la rotación de c ultivos , ya que a l desaparecer el hospedante más prol (fe r o , dism inuye la población de la plaga ,Este mátodo de control cons iste en la utilización de cual quier medio f(sico para el combate de una plaga. En el caso del gusano cachón se utiliza la recolección manua l de las larvas, sobre todo en parcelas pequeñas , y su eliminación med iante inmersión en una mezcla de kerosene y agua . Tambián puede utilizarse la fuerza f(sica para matar las larvas. Otra medida es la captura de los adul tos o mariposas mediante trampas de luz, aprovechando sus hábitos nocturnos y su atracción por la luz, aunque esta tknica no es del todo efectiva y económica .La a plicac ión de productos qu(micos para la destrucción de las plagas es un mátodo muy utilizado en la mayorra de los cultivos, pero s ólo se recomienda para el combate de Erinnyis ello cuando se presentan casos extre-mos de infes tac ión d e tarvas e n plantas jóvenes . Las apt icaciones foliares de productos tales como S evin, Dipterex, Bas udin, Azodrin y BHC , en tas dos is comerciales r ecomendada s , producen buenos resultados e n el control d e a t aques s e veros d e l gusano cachón.Sin embargo, hay que tener p resen te que ta aplicac ión ind is criminada y e l mal uso en gene ral de t os insecticidas pueden traer consecuencias ne gativas a t equilibrio biológico d e l ecos istem a , s obre todo c uando se aplican insecticidas con bajos niveles de infestación de ta plaga , en m ezclas inadec uadas, en dosis incor r e c tas , y en ~po cas inapropiadas . El d esar rollo de poblac iones r esistente s , ta r eaparic ión d e ata ques más seve ros , la conver sión de pla g as secundarias e n plagas de impo r tancia económi ca , t a e li minación de t os enemigos natural es ben~fi cos y ta contaminac ión gene ral del medio ambiente en forma de resid uos m e d ibtes de prod uctos qufm icos per sistentes y nocivos para ta fauna y para el hombre son c onsec uencias d irectas de empl ear el c ontrol qufmico sin tas debidas precauc iones .Et control biot6gi co s e puede definir como el combat e de las plagas mediante l a utit ización deliberad a y sistemática de s u s enemigos natural es. Los intentos d e controla r pl agas por m e dios bi ot6gicos han r e s ultado e xitosos en algunos c ultivos y conc retamente par a algunas plagas, aún c uando todavía exi s ten muchos probl emas que no pu e d en ser solucionados por est e tipo de contr o l. Debido a l a impo rtancia que ha adqui r ido y a s u papel estrat~gico para el control integ r a d o de pl a g a s , y en especial det gusano cach6n, este método se tratará en detall e en t a s iguiente sección .En qué consiste e l control integrado y cuál e s su objetivo p rincipal ? Para inducir el control biológico de Trichogra mma spp . es necesario liber ar adultos c riados artifici a lmente e n el l abor a t o r io, m e diant e un p roceso r e l ativamente senc illo en e l cual se utiliza como sustrato de multiplicación los huevos del lepid6pte r o Sitotroga cerealella. Est o s huevos, una vez colectados y col ocados en carton es engo mados , son som etidos a l a par asitación por Trichogramma spp . Luego, se cortan los cartones en trozos d e una pulgada cuadrada, (Fig. 4) y cuando l os a dultos e s tán prÓximos a emerger s e trasladan al campo y se fijan a l as plantas, e n donde son libera dos (Fig . 5) . Cada pulgada de huevos de S itotroga sp. parasitados produce aproximadamente unos 3 . 000 a 3 . 500 aci.J\\tos. Para combatir el g._ ;ano cach6n en \\a yuca se recomienda e fectuar \\ iberaciones de Trichog ramma spp. utilizando 10 a 20 pulgadas cuadradas por hectárea .Dentro de\\ grupo de parásitos de larvas , \\as especies más importantes son Apante\\es congregatus , ~• americanus y Euplectrus sp .Las avispas del género Apanteles sp. ovi.positan dentro de l a larva de \\a plaga; después de la eclos ión , \\as larvitas s e desarrollan dentro de\\ gusano a limentándos e de é l . Cuando estas larvas están pr6ximas a abandonar e\\ cuerpo del gusano aparecen unas manchas negras y redondas a través de las cual es emergen, (F ig. 6) .Una vez fue r a , \\as \\arvi.tas de\\ par ásito comi enzan a formar un tejido blanco algodonoso al rededor d e \\ gus ano , (Fig. 7) en el cua\\ _se di s tribuye n para luego empupar y finalmente emerger e n forma de adultos , lis t o s para comenzar nuevamente e \\ ciclo , Flg. 6. Larvas de Apanteles sp. abandonando una larva de ~ ello. Flg. 7. Larvas de Apantele s sp. e mpupando alrededor de una l arva de gusano cachón.Otro de los parásitos de larvas de Erinnyis e llo es una avispita del género Euplectrus sp ., la cual ataca la larva especialmente durante s us dos primeros estadios, oviposit ando sobre ella. Al eclosionar, las l arvitas del parásito se fi j an en el cuerpo del gusano del cual s e alimentan . Las larvitas se localtzan d e tal manera que resulta imposible para e l gusano deshacerse de ellas. Posteriormente, se mueven hacia la parte infer ior del gusano en donde empupan, recubriéndose de un teJido marrón claro. Como resul tado el gusano muere y queda recubierto por di cho tejido. Sin embargo, todavía se desconoce la magnitud del control que puede ejercer este parásito sobre las l arvas del cachón.Dentro de lo s insectos que ejercen control biol ógico sob re Erinnyis e ll o están los predatores de larvas tal es como una c hinche del género Podisus sp . y la avispa conocida como chepa o patiamarilla, d e la cual s e conocen dos e s pecies: PoHstes canaC:ensis y P. erythrocephalus. De e s tas especies la más importante es P. e rythrocephalus . Estas avispas , que generalmente viven e n colonias relativamente pequeñas, (Flg . 8) ejer cen su acción predatora degollando inicialmente la larva. S i la larva e s muy grande, la cortan en trozos , a lgunos de l os cuales consumen directamente, el resto l o amasan formando una bola que transportan al avis pero con el fin de alimentar las c rías . Generalmente l a avispa ataca al gusano en su segundo o tercer instar .Para su subsistencia, y la de sus c rías , la avispa requiere diariamente de varias larva s .El control biológico mediante Pol istes sp . puede inducirs e e incr ementarse exitosamente, col ocando avisperos con un pequeño n6mero de avispas en s itios cubiertos cercanos a la plantación de yuca.Para e s to, se construyen unas estructuras s encillas de dos metros d e a lto, cubiertas de paja , en el interior de las cual es se colocan los avisperos , (Fig. 9). Hay que tener en cuenta que la utiltzación de Polistes sp . para el control biol6gico d e Erinnyis ello puede verse limitada por la pres encia d e mos cas del género Oxis arcodexia, las cuales parasitan las larvas y pupas de PoHs tes s p. reduciendo en algunos casos s u pobl ación.De la mis ma manera que existen microorganis mos patógenos para combatir los animales superiores o vertebrados , también s e han podido identificar micr oor ganis mos que atacan específicamente a l os ins ectos en algunas de sus fas e s de des arrollo . Para el control de plagas en a lgunos cultivos (principalmente lepid6pteros en cultivos anual es) se han utilizado algunas especies de bacterias, especial mente bacilos , y ciertos virus específicos . En e l caso del gusano cachbn , s e ha p roba d o con gran éxito el u so de Bacillus t h.Jringiensi s Berline r, un bacilo que ataca las larvas d e 1epid6pteros p r ovocando una especie de septicemia que las des truye . Est e biocida , el cual se encu entr a en e l mer cad o bajo los nombres comerciales de Dipel o T huricide , está compuesto d e las espor as d e l bacilo con l as cuales se preparan soluciones •de a l t a dilución que se aplican al follaje que consume la l a rva .Bacillus thuringiens i s ha resultado muy e f ectivo en l a reducción de pobl aciones altas d e larvas de gusano cachón, sobre todo en sus tres p r imeros ins tares .Con el o bjeto de compr o bar empíricamente la efectividad d e B . thur ingiensis se rea liza r on varios experi mentos .Uno d e e ll os con s i s tió -en la aspe r s ión de una s uspensión del bacil o sob re una parcel a de 50 pl ant as bajo un fue rte a taque d el gusano . La poblac ión de lar vas se m idi ó a ntes y tres dfas d espués de la a plicación . L os res u lt a dos mostraron que l a pobl ación de l a rvas se r eduJO e n u n 68 por c iento y que la bacteria fue más efectiva par a el contr o l d e la lar va en s u s tres p ri meros estadios . (Ver f ig . 10) E n un e xper imento r ealizado e n e l C IAT, a fin d e compar a r l a cantida d de s upe rfi cie folia r consumida por larva con aplicacj.6n del produc t o y s in él , s e observ6 una r e ducción drás t ica en e l con s umo p rome d io de s uperficie fol iar por larva cuando se aplic6 el bacilo. Las l a r vas muri eron dos o t r es d(as después de l a a plicación d e l product o a l consumir el foll a je tratado . (Ver fig . 11 En cada parcela se liberaron aproximadamente 98.000 adultos de Tri chogramma .Muest ra de 100 huevos .Como la acción del biocida no se observa inmediatamente después de la aplicación, algunos agricultores han manifestado reservas en cuanto a la efectividad de este tipo de control; s in embargo, una vez que la larva ha comenzado a consumir el follaje tratado sólo sobrevive dos o tres dfas , s u capacidad de consumo di sminuye considerablemente durante ese lapso.Por otra parte se ha demos trado que la aplicación del producto contentivo de esporas de §. thuringiensis no tiene efectos adversos sobre el parasitis mo de los huevos por Trichogramma spp. tal como se observa en el cuadro 1, por lo que se considera que la apl icaci6n del bacilo conjuntamente con la 1 iberaci6n del parás ito puede ser una buena medida de control del gusano cachón.Cuando se decida utilizar B. thuringiens is para el combate del gusano cachón se recomienda una do sis de dos gramos del producto comercial (Dipel o Thuricide) por cada litro de agua, aplicando hasta 200 litros de l a solución por hectárea. OJando el gusano atacado por el bacilo muere, aparece suspendido de las pseudopatas anales en cualquier lugar de la planta. En este estado, presenta una consistencia blanda y un abultamiento en su sección anterior, debido a la licuefacción de los tejidos internos resultante de la acción patogénica del bacilo .El ú ltimo tipo de control bio16gico es el realizado por vertebrados, entre los cuales se pueden citar batracios , lagartos y aves. Actualmente se desconoce la magnitud d e l contro l que ejercen estos a nimales. Se ha observado que a l gunas especies de ranas y l agartos de gran tamaño se pueden a li mentar de l os adultos de Erinnyis ello que se encuentren a s u alcance; igualmente, s e tiene conocimiento de que varias especies de aves son p redato r es de lar vas. Stn embargo , este tipo de control no tiene tanta importancia como el ejercido por insectos o por microorganismos .D . El control biol ógi co como componente del control integ r a d o El ml!todo de control biol ógico se ha venido practicando des de hace más o menos 100 años en cerca de 60 paí s e s a fin de combatir más de 100 especies d iferentes de plagas. A l comparar lo con otros métodos de control, p r esenta l as siguientes ventajas: es pe r manente , es recomendable desde e l punto de vista ecológico y es económ ico .La única d esventaja proviene de s u complejidad , ya que e l contro l biológico requiere de una s erie de conocimientos previos sobre la vida no s6l o d e la plaga insectil , sino tambil!n de l os enemigo s natural es y más i mportante aún, d e la interacción plaga-enemigo natural.S in e mbargo , e l control integ rado de plagas requie r e necesar iamente dei contr ol biológico , ya que n inguno de l os o tros métodos logra afectar las en s u s etapas c ruc ia l es . Por ejemplo , e l combate qu ími co del gusano cach6n generalmente diezma las larvas e n la plantación en la c ual s e hizo la aspe r s ión de ins e c ticida s , pero su acción es m omentán ea y r estringida a l área asperjada .Por otra parte, a pesar de l as fl uctuaciones e n las poblaciones d e ins ectos , l os e nemigos na t u r ales d e u na pl aga ejer cen s u acción en forma continua , y en cualquie r s itio; por ejemplo l as avis pas Trichogramma spp . pa ras itan los huevos de E rinnyis e llo tanto s obre l as pl antas d e yuca como sobr e cualquier mal e za hosped ant e d e la plaga .C tro aspecto de gran importa n c ia es que e l contro l biológico se bas a en las r elaciones que condi cionan y determinan el equtl ibrio biológico del ecos i s tema , s in atent a r en ni ngún momento contra el s i s t ema mis m o .Po r últi mo los requerimientos bás i cos de los s is t emas integrados del manejo de las pl agas rea firma n l a impor tanc ia d el control b i ológico dentro de e s tos s i s temas ; d e aquí que el conocimiento d e los s i guie ntes a s pect os sea indispensabl e:• L a bi ol ogía , fis io l ogía y ecol ogía tanto d e las plagas insecttles como d e s u s enemigos natura l es .• L a fi s iologí a d el o d e lo s cultivos que s e desea protege r.• L os niveles d e pobl aci ón de la plaga que puede toler a r e l c ultivo s in que s e trad-Jzca en u na disminución de l a cosecha .• Los factores bi6ticos y abi6ticos que r egulan las fluctuaciones de las poblaciones de las plagas insectiles.• El impacto que tienen l as diversas p r ácticas de contro l utiliza das s obre las plagas insectiles , sus enemigos naturales y sobre el ecosist e ma en gener al .• Debido a lo dinámico y flexible del sistema, es necesario contar con técnicas par a un mues treo rápido y segu r o que permita tomar una decis ión sobr e la apl icaci6n de u na medida de control. Describa brevemente el proceso de uttltzaci6n de la avispa Trichogramma sp. para el combate biológico del gusano cachón.IV. Diferencie la acct6n de A pa ntel es sp . de la de Euplectrus sp . sobre las larvas de E. ello.V. Describa el m od o de acct6n de l a avispa chepa (Pol istes sp.) y señale c6mo se puede fomentar su acct6n predat ora par a los fines del control biol6gi co del gusano cach6n . El control integr ado de Erlnnyis ello debe iniciarse Inmediatamente después de la cosecha anter ior , aplicando medidas cultura l es como arar entre hileras y el combate de las mal ezas. El control biológico d ebe fomentarse continuamente, aGn sin la ocurrencia de ataques severos; una buena opción es la utilización combinada de los parásitos de huevos (Tric hogramma spp . ) con l os predator es de lar vas (Polistes sp . ) y parásitos de larvas (Apanteles sp . y E upl ectrus s p.).E s r ecomendabl e que e l ag riculto r efectGe c ontinua y especialmente en plantac io nes jóvenes , conteos de huevos parasitados y no par asi t ados. Si e l nGmero de huevos no pa r asitados aumenta , se puede predecir que habrá un aumento s imilar en el nGmero d e larvas. En este caso, lo más aconsejable es efectuar una liberación de avispas Trichogramrna s pp.(1 O a 20 pulgadas cuadradas por hectá r ea) o reali zar una aspersión de Bacillus thuringiensis (350 a 400 g r amos por hectárea).El control qu (mico debe evitarse en lo posible pues su uso continuado provoca la ruptura del e q uilib rio existente entre la población de la plaga, la de sus enemigos natur ales y la fauna en gener al , acentuando ataques posterio.res del insecto. Por lo tanto , sól o debe usa r se cuando el ataque es muy severo (altas poblaciones de la rvas por planta) y cuando tiene luga r en plantaciones jóvenes (hasta los 6 meses) y s iguiendo siempre las r ecomendaciones precisas.•","tokenCount":"5456"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1066498307.json b/data/part_2/1066498307.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2c8442cc581bf4748e1c4824ad76545d4b31a982 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1066498307.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4718cf73837be21b2e9a09f2a0aeac7c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/aa065c1d-3057-4094-9a59-c866cf972402/retrieve","id":"-43137550"},"keywords":["Heterosis","lattice design","genotypes","Striga related traits","maize"],"sieverID":"c77ebdf7-5ce1-4ae4-8fb3-2933c8f6f404","pagecount":"8","content":"Heterosis for yield, secondary traits and Striga resistance was estimated in maize test crosses generated from fifteen inbred lines and three testers using line by tester analysis. Hybrids, testcrosses and parents were evaluated for two years at Agricultural Research Institute, Sotuba and Sanankoroba, to identify combinations expressing high hybrid vigor in Mali under Striga-infested and Striga-free conditions. Under Striga-free condition TZISTR106 /TZISTR1230, TZISTR106/TZISTR1223 and TZISTR1033/ TZISTR1223 appeared as the best hybrids combinations with respect to grain yield, while combinations TZISTR1207/ TZISTR1226, TZISTR106 /TZISTR112, TZISTR106 / TZISTR113 and TZISTR106/ TZISTR1028 showed positive mid parent heterosis for grain yield and negative mid parent heterosis for Striga related traits under Striga infestation. These hybrids are worthy for further utilization.Maize occupied the second place with 28.27% after rice 31.36% in term of production in Mali l'Enquête Agricole de Conjoncture EAC, 2016/2017. The crop is now an important cereal in both rural and urban areas because of its economic profitability and its use in food and feed (60 to 70% of the poultry ration) conferred an important role in food security. The industrial use of maize represents another particularly important outlet. National companies canned, biscuits, but also batteries, pharmaceuticals or paint and beverages have significant needs for starch or corn flour. The total production is 8 964 829 tones, the area planted in maize in Mali from the last five years varied from 579 396 ha in 2013 to 1031 522 ha in 2017 according to EAC, 2017, this evolution indicates that maize have seen very high superficies' growth almost the double of the area planted in five years, while average yield remain almost static (2.35t/ha to 2.85t/ha) FAO, 2015. The demand for food and feed is increasing due to the development of poultry industry, the pisciculture and fattening cattle. To meet the increasing demand hybrid maize can be successfully used.of the maize varieties grown, hybrids occupied 2.27% while OPV gained 97.5% (PLAN DE CAMPAGNE AGRICOLE CONSOLIDE ET HARMONISE 2018/ 2019). Among these hybrid just few are resistant to Striga hermonthica. Heterosis has been exploited for hybrid production and it play an important role in achieving successful hybrid production. As reported by researchers, heterosis occurred in quantities in maize grain yield, plant height, ear height, days to maturity and 1000 seeds weight Coulibaly et al., 2015. It is helful in identification of parental lines performance in hybrid combination. Little emphasis has been addressed to Striga resistance in heterosis study in maize in Mali. Heterosis in maize hybrids has been subjected to grain yield in drought prone area Coulibaly, 2013 but information on heterosis for Striga resistance traits in crosses between inbred lines with different patterns of Striga hermonthica is yet to be done. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to estimate the heterosis for grain yield, plant and ear height, days to maturity and Striga resistance traits in crosses using fifteen inbred lines and three testers in line by tester design.The experiment was carried out in the rainy season from 2014 to 2015 at Regional Centre for Agronomic Research (CRRA) station in Sotuba (12°39'47'' North 7°54'50'' West) and Sanankoroba (12° 23'51.67'' North and 7° 56'22.10'' West) in southern Mali. The hybrid trial was composed of 48 entries made up of forty five (45) experimental hybrids originated from a line by tester cross among the fifteen inbred lines and three inbred testers (TZSTRI106, TZSTRI1207 and TZSTRI1033) and two checks (Farako and Mata). The F1 crosses, two checks and the parental lines were planted separately. The F1 hybrids were planted in 6x8 alpha lattice design, while the parental lines were planted in randomize completed block design. The parental lines were all obtained from IITA and derived from various source populations. The list of fifteen inbred lines plus three inbred testers used in this study are described in table 1. The pedigree of these lines indicated the presence of Zea diploperennis an African landraces and elite tropical germplasm which contained an excellent source of resistance to Striga hermonthica. Seeds were sown in single row plot, 5 m long with spacing of 0.75 m between rows and 0.25 m between hills on the same row. Under both Strigainfested and Striga-free condition, all agronomic practices were kept constant except for hand weeding under Striga-infested condition for whole of the experiment. Where SR= Striga resistant line and ST= Striga tolerant line Data for all traits were on a per plot basis for each experiment at each location. Under both Striga-free and Striga-infested, data on traits including grain yield (Yield), anthesis-silking interval (ASI) and plant height (PLHT) were collected in addition Striga related traits such as Striga damage rating 8 and 10 weeks after planting and Striga emergence count at 8 and at 10 weeks after planting collected under Strigainfested environments. The differences between the days to 50% silking and 50% anthesis is called anthesis-silking interval. Plant height the distance from the base of the plant to the height of the first tassel branch was collected from an average of five random plants. However, Striga damage rating was scored on a scale of 1 -9 as described by Kim, 1994. Striga emergence count was counted, while ASI are observed. Grain yield was calculated in kilogram per hectare and was estimated based on 80% shelling percentage and adjusted to 15% moisture. Grain yield under Striga-infested environment was calculated as followsWhere, GY = grain yield (kg ha-1), Fwt = field weight of harvested ears per plot (kg), m = moisture content grain at harvest, 10,000 = land area per hectare (m 2 ), Ȣ = land area per plot (0.75 m x 0.25 m), ɸ = number of hills/plot (20) and 0.80 = 80 % shelling percentage. The mid parent heterosis (MPH) were calculated in terms of percent increase (+) or decrease (-) of the F1 hybrids against its mid-parent value as suggested by Fehr, 1987.F1=Mean value of a cross, MP = mid parent value of the particular F1 cross [(P1 + P2)/2]. Test of significance for percent heterosis was made using the t-test.Where, MSE = mean square error; S = number of site, Y = number of year the trial were conducted, r = number of replications; 2-the \"t\" for each entry, hybrid was calculated as follow t = Entry heterosis/SEentry The t calculated value was tested against the t value at degree of freedom for error Analysis of variance for grain yield, Striga resistance and secondary traits were performed in SAS 9.3 software using the model described by Kempthorne, 1957. Genotypes were considered fixed effects, while replications and environments were considered random effects.The analysis of variance revealed that there is significant (P < 0.05) difference for all traits among genotypes under Striga-infested and Striga-free conditions (Table 2). Under Strigainfested conditions the Genotypes by environment mean squares was significant for most traits except for Striga damage rating at 8 and 10 weeks after planting. Significant positive mid-parent heterosis were observed for all hybrids for grain yield under Striga-infested and Striga-free conditions. The mid-parent heterosis values for grain yield were higher under Strigafree conditions than Striga-infested conditions (Table 4). Mid-parent heterosis ranged from 105.8% (TZISTR106/ TZISTR110) to 259.5% (TZISTR106/ TZISTR1230) for grain yield under Striga-free conditions and from 100 % (TZISTR1033 / TZISTR1218) to 228.2% (TZISTR1033 / TZISTR1223) for grain yield under Striga-infested conditions. Mid-parent heterosis for plant height ranged from -0.7% (TZISTR1207/ TZISTR1237) to 44.9% (TZISTR1033 /TZISTR1227) under Striga-free conditions and from -6.7% (TZISTR1207/ TZISTR1235, TZISTR1207 / TZISTR1237) to 40.1% (TZISTR1033 / TZISTR1222) under Striga-infested conditions. Crosses TZISTR1207 / TZISTR1237 exhibited significant negative heterosis for plant height under both conditions. Some crosses also exhibited significant positive heterosis for plant height under both conditions. Anthesis-silking interval showed values ranging from -100% to 122.2% under Striga-free conditions and from -52.1% to 107.7% for grain yield under Striga-infested conditions. The range is wider under Striga-free conditions than Striga-infested conditions for anthesis-silking interval. The mean value range was wider for grain yield than for the others traits under both conditions. Striga damage rating at 8 and 10 WAP exhibited the highest number of negative mean values compare to Striga emergence count at 8 and 10 WAP under Striga-infested conditions. Significant negative heterosis were found for five hybrids for the same trait under Striga-free conditions, with heterosis value ranging from -100 to 122.2. Among the forty five hybrids, cross TZISTR1033/ TZISTR1227 exhibited significant negative heterosis for ASI under Striga-infested conditions, heterosis were found in a range from -2, 2 to 107.7. The heterosis estimates for plant height were positive for most hybrids except six crosses. The midparent heterosis estimate, in percentage was found in a range of -0.7 to 44.9 under Striga-free conditions and -6.7 to 40.1 under Striga-infested. Their magnitude is lower under Striga-infested compare to Striga-free. The estimate heterosis for grain yield was positively significant with high magnitude. Similar result was found by Tonette and Carena, 2014 enabling plant breeder to select good lines and their promising hybrids. Three out of the twenty hybrids exhibited negative mid parent heterosis for anthesis silking interval in both conditions indicating that theses crosses could be tolerant to Striga. This finding agree with Lu et al., (2010) who reported that low anthesis silking interval is mostly used to screen genotypes for stresses tolerance. Lesser difference between anthesis and silking is desirable for grain sitting. The finding also corroborate with those of Iqbal et al., (2010) who fund negative mid parent over, reported that these crosses could be either due to dominance at the same locus or different dominant genes which are closely linked and /or pleiotropic in their action. Hybrid TZISTR1207/TZISTR1238 exhibited negative mid parent heterosis for plant height under both conditions, indicating that they have not been affected by the effect of the parasite. This is desirable because dwarf plant can reduce the final yield of maize crop while high plant height could also cause plant lodging as reported by Ali et al., (2011b). According to Scapim et. al., (2006) reported that when the level of heterosis is low the choice of parental line for hybrid development should be based on their means. Similarly, hybrids TZISTR1207/ TZISTR110, TZISTR1207 /TZISTR112 and TZISTR1207/ TZISTR113 exhibited positive mid parent heterosis for plant height. This finding corroborate with Uzarowska et al., (2007) who observed substantial mid-parent heterosis for plant height in field environment. For the entire hybrids mentioned above the heterosis was in desirable direction. TZISTR1207/TZISTR1238 exhibited significant and negative mid parent heterosis under Strigainfested condition indicating the availability of variability for hybrid for this trait. The level of heterosis observed for Striga related traits was lower than for grain yield and plant height. This is in agreement with study undertake by Solomon et al., (2012) on sweet corn who found that quality related traits exhibited mean value mid parent heterosis lower than for most agronomic trait. There is lack or lesser significance for Striga related traits, this finding agree with Kvitschal et al., (2004) who reported that this absence could be explained by the lack of difference in among the degrees of complementation with each other, in relation to the frequency of alleles at loci with some dominance and predominating additive effects.In this study, the mid-parent heterosis for grain yield were noted for all crosses under Strigainfested and Striga-free conditions. Under Striga-free condition test crosses TZISTR106/ TZISTR1230, TZISTR106 / TZISTR1223 and TZISTR1033/TZISTR1223 appeared as the best hybrids combinations with respect to grain yield, while combinations TZISTR1207 /TZISTR1226, TZISTR106/ TZISTR112, TZISTR106/ TZISTR113 and TZISTR106 /TZISTR1028 show positive mid parent heterosis for grain yield and negative mid parent heterosis for Striga related traits under Striga infestation. Amongst tester TZISTR106 and TZISTR1033 contributed a lot toward the exposure of Striga related traits. Hybrids exceed the best parent in yield and productivity. ","tokenCount":"1946"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1067366450.json b/data/part_2/1067366450.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1a94c4a895c891f55ea3ff5201ff4e5fe917c404 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1067366450.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"8c09d0ab8cbff0afb8838221af77bc1b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/36c3c635-7cee-4ef7-973d-6eb4f78d7d22/retrieve","id":"-1807513755"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"4b499835-025f-4f7c-b3f1-e1a12e231495","pagecount":"2","content":"Phakopsora pachyrhizi Syd. was reported on legume hosts other than soybean in Tanzania as early as 1979 (1). Soybean rust (SBR), caused by P. pachyrhizi, was first reported on soybean in Africa in Uganda in 1996 (3), and its introduction into Africa was proposed to occur through urediniospores blowing from western India to the African east coastal areas by moist northeast monsoon winds (4). The fungus rapidly spread and was reported on soybean in South Africa in 2001, in western Cameroon in 2003, and in Ghana and the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2007 (5). A second species causing SBR on soybean, P. meibomiae, has not been reported in Africa or elsewhere, outside of the Americas. From 2012 to 2014, symptomatic leaf samples were collected in the major soybean growing areas of the Tanzanian Southern Highlands (Iringa, Mbeya, and Ruvuma regions). Symptoms of SBR included yellowing of leaves and tan sporulating lesions. These symptoms were observed at flowering through seed maturity. From fields surveyed in 2012, 2013, and 2014, SBR was observed in 5 of 14, 7 of 11, and 14 of 31 fields, respectively. Some of the leaves sampled had up to 80% of the leaf area affected. When microscopically examined, urediniospores were elliptical, echinulate, and hyaline to pale yellowish brown. In 2014, sporuliferous uredinia were observed on leaf material collected from the Iringa and Ruvuma regions of Tanzania, and a subset of these samples was sent by APHIS permit to the University of Illinois. To confirm the pathogen, symptomatic soybean leaf tissue of approximately 1 cm 2 was excised from each of the samples, and DNA was extracted using the FastDNA Spin Kit (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH), with further purification using the MicroElute DNA Clean-up Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA). The DNA was subjected to quantitative PCR using published Taqman assays for P. pachyrhizi, P. meibomiae, and a multiplexed exogenous internal control reaction to validate negative results (2). P. pachyrhizi DNA was detected in excess of 66,000 genome equivalents/cm 2 in all samples, and P. meibomiae DNA was determined to be absent from all samples (limit of quantification ~2 pg DNA/cm 2 ). Free surviving urediniospores were dislodged from 12 samples and inoculated onto susceptible soybean cultivar Williams 82, which produced sporulating SBR lesions after 2 weeks of incubation in a detached-leaf assay. Thus, Koch's postulates were completed. This is the first report of P. pachyrhizi causing rust on soybean in Tanzania. In vivo cultures have been established from most of these samples, and ongoing research includes an evaluation of the P. pachyrizi virulence on a differential set, and characterization of the genetic diversity.","tokenCount":"437"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1070373630.json b/data/part_2/1070373630.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aabf2b006aac60f3006887e977ed847a097f91f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1070373630.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a33acc093ac59860e04f66cfb90d0a9e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e467ad3b-3112-4c6c-8e22-74f55dc936f8/retrieve","id":"760282023"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"1a5f2902-5687-4ac4-82aa-758fa4157449","pagecount":"5","content":"Vietnam's food systems are rapidly evolving. Food safety is a high priority for consumers and the government. A4NH scientists contributed to a range of initiatives which have supported a shift in food safety policy and implementation. One of the most effective initiatives was the National Food Safety Risk Assessment Taskforce. Based on a recent assessment report, requested by the government and contributed by the Taskforce and partners, the government committed to implementing measures to improve food safety in the country.• # of more farm households have adopted improved varieties, breeds or treesVietnam's food systems are evolving rapidly, making food safety a high priority for the government. Over the past four years, A4NH scientists from ILRI mobilized, produced, or contributed to a range of initiatives which have supported a shift in food safety policy from an inspection and enforcement approach to a risk-based inspection and monitoring system bolstered by compliance incentives.One of the most effective initiatives that have supported these changes has been the Vietnamese National Food Safety Risk Assessment Taskforce ('Taskforce'). In 2013, scientists from ILRI teamed up with national and international partners to establish the Taskforce. Since then, it has conducted a series of cutting-edge studies on risk assessment and the cost of illness and, based on the findings, developed guidelines and materials to enhance food safety in pork value chains. These materials have been used in assisting key ministry officials and researchers to bring risk-based approaches to food safety management [1,2,3] In 2017, the World Bank published a report, which was convened by the government and technically led by ILRI and the Taskforce [4]. The report included critical evidence from A4NH research on the safety of perishable foods and the importance of traditional markets, the first ever quantitative assessment of Salmonella in pork, and the first-ever cost assessment of foodborne diseases. As a follow-up of the report, the government committed to implementing measures to improve risk assessment, risk communications and management, and foodborne disease surveillance (5). As part of the government's commitment, researchers and officials are working with a coalition of national and international partners to improve pork safety by developing, testing, and promoting incentive-based interventions and equitable, sustainable, and scalable recommendations. It is estimated that improvements will have positive effects on 10 million farmers and other value chain actors, 7,000 traditional markets, and 94 million consumers. Local authorities in Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh and Hai Phong have begun developing plans to implement the report's recommendations with development partners. This project would improve food safety for 20 million people in those cities.","tokenCount":"424"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1079304401.json b/data/part_2/1079304401.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..37a04c4b37cac80bb4eb7efd24d492dbafc19dbb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1079304401.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e34c1917f16e1ab0c2be9024836aeb9b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/3a7cc701-59fd-4b84-9a8b-6894d80c2d09/retrieve","id":"1173238939"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"8a8064fe-a771-4a10-bd24-614fe2d2f216","pagecount":"40","content":"Ama membaa Bajrangi Community Seed Bank dri i. Ama olu tauni ungwele Balapur rii 'i ga. Ani 'di esua Bundelkhand ga, India 'a. Ami'do Community seed bank 'di kinya 2016 si. Soko Balapur ga 'dia a'a rii ga angwa dru. Soko amgbugo dru ri Karwi district ga. Koca kilomita 12 ra. Driadru a'a ama idrea rii, ama osu ni drile mgbilimgbili (chickpeas, green grams, lentils, linseed, mustard, peas, pigeon peas) 'a ta mba awu. Anyu, go'do, rusu, ngana tro sa a'a. Ama rusu, ngano, osu tro sa azile. Onya zii pi ri amaa saa amani nyale. Jo azile saa amazia ga angwa dru.'Ba amani cara loso ri kweka ri a'i 'di 'baa i: Deendaya Research Institue a'i Bioversity International tro.Amale ama mi anyi tro le'jo vodo (technical issues) drii. Ovi dru ori ni ero kominiti dri ka e'bu idre ingoni ya i. Ziani 'di ama anyi ikonyi ingoni ori ni ero kominiti dri i'dore ga i. Ori ni ero kominiti dri alu alu, ole 'ba ta ni'ba loso ta 'di nii idri ra rii. Ta 'di ka saa le anyi dri si amgbu ra.Anyi le ori ingo 'a ta mbale awu anya ori ni ero kominiti dri 'i ga i? Ta kolea anyi 'ba ati ri, ori onya dru 'baa lele ambamba rii. 'Ba kpoo kolea kole ni. A'i 'ba 'di pi: uku ago tro, 'ba ciri 'ba amba tro, 'ba ta tro rii 'ba ta ako rii, losi'ba ire rii losi'ba lolu rii tro.Ori ni ero kominiti dri amgbu ka mori ta, ori igweka dri jo kusa esuka na dria okpori ri undrure ga. Ori 'di zi ti ole ni, aia rangi andreka loso is, ku saa azo ki na a' andreka loso, ole anaa runyaka limilimi si. Vu amgbu si ta uku alele ori ru ga ri mgbi ago alele ri tro. Kolea ota ki asi mgbili mgbili 'dii iru. Ka 'ba ikony ra, 'di ori ingo ni omba ta na awu ya i.Vu amgbu si, a'di ki esua, 'ba amgbu ole ori kozo cuwi o'du 'dinia rii. A'du siku o'du 'diinia eyi keca a'dungani ya ni oniru ku.Ta zi kolea ota ki anyi tro asi laka ra, jo 'ba ni mori koca ori ni drile yayadru mgbili mgbili ri a ta mbajo wa ya i. Jo morii iyo kolea ota ki asi ori ni drile ga ka. Jo alu isa saa unji ku. A'di inja 'di 'di, a'di zii 'baa lini inja si.Ta okpo ori loso ri ovire ga ri, a'di anya ovoloyi ako, pelere ri esu ingoni ya i.Leti loso ta 'di idrejo wa ri 'di 'baa pii:• Kolea acii kii amvua ori loso, pelere ri ovire ga • O'du ori loso ri ole alu ga si isa ku. Kolea opi amvu ni 'a kpoo ori pelere ri undrure ga ovire ga tro• Kolea ovi kii ori andre'ba pelere ri awu. O'ba oru, ori dru.• Ori amvu ni lokokori ga rii, ota ku. Amgbu na emuru ta zi 'baa pi tro ra.• Ovi ki ori andre'ba loso, pelere , laza ako (disease free) rii.Jo ovi ki ra ri, e'be ki ori andre'ba laza tro ri ra. O'bu 'a i'dole nyale ra ri tro. Saa a'di kii ori 'di 'ba dru sutoa 'a rii, kolea o'ba kii ku ori andre'ba laza tro rii. A'dusi ku, ori laza tro ri jo 'oba sutoa 'a, ka ki rinja 'daku. Ka ori zi 'baa inya ra.Zi ti si kolea undruki ma'di (extension worker) ta nire ori ni drile ga nja ri, kikonyi dru 'ba ni.Vu amgbu si ovi a'di ori ni ta mbaka loso ri ole vu aci kusa i'gbe ambamba ri ku. Awusi dru ta kolea oni ki ote, otra ki asi laka ri' 'di 'baa pii:√ Kolea ole a'di ori ni ta mba laka ri kolu aci ambamba ku (temperature). Awusi dru ori konga dru loso wa.√ Suali ole okojo a'di ori 'ba aru ri kolea kolu pelere. Jo ani cupa ya, gilasi ya, utu ya. Awusi dru ori osu dru ku.√ Ori 'di kolea kolu ebi ku (moisture content). Kolea ko'wi ca. Awu si dru konga dru emi.","tokenCount":"681"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1092560385.json b/data/part_2/1092560385.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1fceed4d00b6fe59ad30e76147a3bcf6652d8674 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1092560385.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e965d9c58a424575bb56f9ed5ae658ad","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/6bfdb547-26e5-4b2f-9736-999512e00eef/retrieve","id":"-191198636"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"73a10182-0520-4f60-8ac6-1d47104aaa70","pagecount":"12","content":"i.l. 'J .1 ~IHea~ The objective of the Section is to study and develop preventive medicine schemes adapted to the pasture and management production systems developed by the Tropical Pastures Program. Strategies for attaining this objective were explained in detail befare (CIAT 1979,, Tropical Pastures Program Annual Report).ETES Brazil. Herds surveyed in the vicinity of Brasilia revealed that the farms milking cows in more intensive production systems have considerable more control measures for ticks, hemoparasite and gastrointestinal parasites, than beef herds. Severa! farms have installed preventive schemes with dippings every 15 days for tick control. This is in concurrence with the need to keep ticks at a level which will not affect productivity, maintaining at the same time a high degree of protection against hemoparasites. In contrast, at the moment there is no widespread control against ticks in pure beef herds in the ares. It appears that most of the beef animals are zebu types which are somewhat more resistant to ticks. On the other hand, animal density is much lower in beef than in the mixed dairy herds, an average of 0.5 AU/ha vs. 1 AU/ha, respectively.As far as vaccination is concerned, 10 of 12 farms in the ETES Brazil Project vaccinate against foot and mouth disease; all of the farms vaccinate against black-leg, and only one vaccinates against brucelosis. This lack of vaccination against brucelosis is probably one of the reasons for the high prevalence of Brucela abortus infection in beef cattle herds under extensive range conditions in the north of Mato Grosso.Most technical assistants are recommending vaccination of adult animals agains botulism. Even though this could be useful in herds where cases of botulism have appeared, it is not economical for all herds in the ares, since reporta of botulism cases are localized.In relation to nematode infestation most farms deworm once a year; however, they treat adults more often than young animals. This practice does not agree with most recommendations, since field studies revealed that young animals are more susceptible to round-worms than adults, and it is more important to remove parasites from growing animals.In relation to photosensitization, three of seven farms reported cases in animals between 10 and 12 months of age. Ranchera associate the problem with the first grazing of the pasture and believe that it appears more often when the pasture is high. ETES Venezuela. Some of the farms in the ETES Venezuela Project reported similar problema. Severa! include ticks as an increasing problem in recent years. Farmers feel they have more tick problems toward the beginning of the dry season. They also feel that Dermatobia hominis, \"nuche\", is rapidly increasing. One possible reason is the forest invasion of the open savannas. This new cover provides an adequate environment for the fly and the vectors. The forest cover is expanding because savannas are not burned, a practice which is banned in Venezuela.It is also of interest that small farmers who have credit for milk operations have experienced calf mortality problema, probably due to interna! parasites and hemoprotozoos, and also are being forced to spray against ticks every 21 days to prevent losses and to maintain milk production. Some farmers at low technical input levels do not treat animals against interna! parasites until they experience losses from high infestation and anemia.In Venezuelan farms two other conditions are reported. One is \"sequita\" which is probably similar to \"secadera\" from the Llanos of Colombia and \"peste de secar\" in the Cerrado of Brazil. Farmers believe that \"sequita\" occurs at any age including that of young animals. Antibiotic treatments and body stimulants have been tried with limited success. If this conditions is similar to the \"secadera\" cases in Colombia, mineral deficiencies could be involved. Ranchera also report cases of botulism, especially in areas of \"Valle de la Pascua\" and \"El Tigre\". Even though there are no confirmed laboratory cases, farmers are beginning to vaccinate. The main problem could be a mineral deficiency that induces animals to consume careases, thereby picking up the botulism toxin.This project is carried out in full cooperation among the Cattle Production Systems, Economics and Animal Health Sections. A complete description of the project appears in the Cattle Production Systems Section. Animal health information was obtained from surveys as reported above, of cattle ranches and examination of individual samples in each farm. Data analysis from farms in the Colombia and Brazil Projects was presented in CIAT 1980 Annual Report. Collection of data for ETES Venezuela has been completed and will be analyzed shortly.Overall cattle mortality in Carimagua decreased over the last four years. Present mortality (2.0%) is ata reasonable low leve! (Table 1). As stated in last year's CIAT Annual Report, this is a reflection of better nutrition of the herds as well as of closer and more effective animal management. Calf mortality stabilized this year at 6.2% of 550 registered births (Table 2). The main factors that contribute to calf mortality in Carimagua are sequelae of nave! infections that induce poliartritis and abcesses. This is secondary to difficulties in management when calves are not treated soon after birth. Nutrition-disease relationships. Monitoring of various herds in Carimagua showed the usefulness of two tests to study nutrition-disease relationships. A comparison is made in Table 3 of blood parameters from a group of animals with clinical malnutrition, with apparently normal cattle, and a group with externa! photosensitivity lesiona. The animals with clinical malnutrition have total blood serum protein levels significantly lower than the steers on grass/legume associations (P < 0.10). In the photosensitivity animals blood protein is at normal levels and G.G.T. enzyme is significantly higher than in the other two groups (P < 0.10), indicating a liver lesion from some toxic effect.Animals with no apparent disease (steers on grass/legume associations) have both total protein and G.G.T .• enzyme at normal levels. LSD GGT 24.78 2 Different letters denote differences significant at the 0.1 level.Bioecology of Boophilus microplus. This is the most important externa! parasite in the Topical Pastures Program target area. It has become one of the priorities for in-depth studies and is one of the factors being modified by changes in animal management resulting from introduction of sown pastures. A project was designed to study population dynamics of the tick in the Colombian Llanos. Its main objective is to study the effects of ecological factors in the infestation levels in animals with adult ticks. It is especially important to know seasonal variations of tick levels in the pastures and in the animals in this area.The ecological conditions provided by Andropogon gayanus, Brachiaria decumbens, Melinis minutiflora and native savanna in pure stands for tick populations are evaluated during two full rainy and dry seasons. Animals are under continuous grazing and optimum stocking rates for each grass in each season, as described in CIAT's 1980 Annual Report.• Each paddock is infested with 500 evenly distributed engorged female ticks per animal. No acaricides are applied to the animals at any time. Evaluations (height and coverage) of grass in each paddock are made to define the conditions under which the larvae and adult populations are present. Tick larvae are evaluated on the pastures every two weeks and adult ticks on the animals every week.•Tick larvae populations are in the process of stabilization. After the first 13 samplings, Melinis grasa had the lowest counts, followed by native savanna, Brachiaria decumbens and !• gayanus; however, the counts on !• decumbens increased toward the end of the rainy season.Levels of adult ticks on the animals are probably a better reflection of the environment influence on the tick population. Heifers in !• decumbens and !• gayanus paddocks have the highest infestation levels during the first six months of the rainy season (Figure 1). •, t 1 ' ' Levels of infestation in Brachiaria have increased gradually from low levels of 20 adult ticks/head per day, to levels above 100 ticks/head, which are considered high. Levels in animals on Andropogon gayanus are of medium intensity, averaging between 20 and 30 adult ticks. For animals on M. minutiflora and native savanna the levels of adutt ticks are similar-and low (5-10 ticks average). In the first rainy season Brachiaria and Andropogon provided better environment for the persistence of larvae that end up as adult ticks in the animals.Pasture coverage could be one of the factors explaining differences in tick levels. At the August sampling (Table 4), Andropogon gayanus had roughly half the coverage of Brachiaria, and the average tick counts on the animals were much lower in the Andropogon group (20-30 ticks/head) as compared to the Brachiaria group (100-120 ticks/head) (Figure 1).The findings of adult tick counts on the animals parallel observations of potted pastures. Larvae of !• microplus are seen readily in the leaves of !• decumbens, !• gayanus and even native savanna. However, they do not crawl on the leaves of M. minutiflora. Larvae in the pots only crawl dry and dead leaves of Melinis, and this is probably one reason why animals pasturing Melinis have low tick levels. This confirma previous observations that Melinis pastures have some repellent effect on the ticks.The level of hemoparasites in the heifers is being measured. It is becoming evident (Figure 2) that animals grazing !• decumbens and A.gayanus have increased reactions compared with animals grazing ~• minutiflora and native savanna.The reaction to hemoparasites coincided with the tick adult counts, except for the heifers on !• gayanus. Even though these are resulta of only one rainy season, there is a tendency for M. minutiflora and native savanna to have lower larvae tick counts on the-pasture, lower adult ticks on the animals, and less reaction against hemoparasites-.An apparently atable population of ticks in the pasture has been obtained and variations seen in larvae and adult tick counts are beginning to reflect differences in the environment offered by the pastures for tick multiplication and persistence. Information obtained from the next dry and rainy seasons will be useful for best knowledge of tick ecology that can be used in the design of control measures.Photosensitization in cattle grazing Brachiaria decumbens. Photosensitization in young animals grazing B. decumbens is a limiting factor for the use of this pasture in the Program's target area. Work continued to determine the main epidemiological factors involved in presentation of the syndrome as well as possible control measures. This syndrome resembles the photosensitization seen in sheep and cattle in New Zealand.No evidence has been found of the seasonality of the condition. However, clinical cases in the past four years show a tendency for cases to appear in the middle and at the end of the rainy season (Figure 3). Age is an important determinant; most cases occurred in cattle between 9 and 24 months of age. Cases in 1981 had two, commonly seen, clinical manifestations (Table 5). The animals developed edemas in the lower neck, dewlap and ears. This edematous form is apparently more acute and usually terminates in death of affected animals (7/6 animals in 1981). There was an obvious liver involvement detected by gross lesions and high levels of G.G.T. and S.G.O.T. enzymes. In the skin necrosis form, the animals developed severe necrosis in several areas of the skin, but most frequently in the perineal region, abdomen and lower part of the neck. Animals thus infected generally recover. The levels of G.G.T. and S.G.O.T. are also elevated as a reflect of liver lesions; animals developed generalized icterous and elarged liver. The clinical and pathological changes were manifestations of the hepatic damage. -------------Range ------------- Forty-one steers grazing Brachiaria decumbens were monitored through weighings and liver functions tests from the end of tpe dry season through the middle of the rainy season. Monitoring was conducted in cooperation with the Pasture Productivity and Management Section. Weight losses were valued, assuming gains of 100 gm/head per day for the dry season (December-March), 300 gm for March through May, and 500 gm for May through July, as a minimum for ~• decumbens.A comparison of liver damage and weight changes in animals revealed a significant relationship at the March sampling (P < 0.10). For the second sampling in May the relationship was highly significant (P< 0.01), and for the July sampling there was no relationship (Table 6). It appears that at the initial stages of liver damage, corresponding weight alterations are not significant. However, as liver damage becomes more pronounced weight is significantly altered. This second stage coincided with appearance of animals with externa! photosensitivity lesions. Toward the end of the observation period, most animals had recovered from liver. damage; however, convalescent animals were not gaining weight as expected. It is evident that when hepatic damage is induced in animals grazing ~• decumbens a significant proportion loses weight before developing externa! photosensitization lesions.Evaluation was made of the relation of enzyme G.G.T. levels and liver lesions in animals with clinical disease. High average levels are seen at the onset of clinical disease (Figure 4). They begin to drop and reach normal levels 30 days after the first appearance of clinical signs.A hypothesis for the etiology of photosensitivity is that the Pithomyces chartarum fungus is involved in its appearance. However, a system must be found to reproduce clinical signs to better study the syndrome. A strain of P. chartarum was isolated from a Carimagua paddock; the fungus was-cultured in the laboratory, multiplied extensively, and returned to the same paddock in greater concentration. decumbens pasture. Fifteen 18-months old heifers were allowed to graze the inoculated pasture. One month after seeding the spores, ene animal showed clinical symptoms of photosensitivity and four more were found with subclinical affection (hepatic damage). Quilichao area were sent to Ruakura Animal Health Laboratory in New Zealand and to the National Research Council labs in Canada for detection of Pithomyces toxin (sporidesmin). From 15 cultures so far tested only three have shown to produce toxin. However, toxin concentration lower than ene was obtained from cultures isolated in New Zealand. Hence, it appears that other factors might be involved in the etiology of the syndrome. The next step will be to evaluate the role of zinc in conjunction with the fungus in the etiology and/or as a control mechanism.Test herds. This section is in charge of the ICA/CIAT herds. Production objectives were described in the 1978 CIAT Annual Report. Main emphasis is to produce experimental animals of high quality and uniformity. There are 300 breeding cows divided in seven herds, with one bull for every 25 cows in a system of seasonal mating from May through September. Calving rate through September of this year was 61.7%, very similar to the previous two years. Calf mortality up to weaning was 5% this year, considerably below that of 1979 and 1980. Calves were weaned at nine months of age •.During the year the test herds provided 318 animals for research projects at Carimagua.","tokenCount":"2459"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1094983521.json b/data/part_2/1094983521.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..82d25111f819610b01a0d72cef9d643c7ba3f640 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1094983521.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e51e051e0f1fadea003bc3c573da0b37","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/80e3aaf2-a747-4a4a-b58e-060e2a6bb11d/content","id":"749214796"},"keywords":["Bioinformatics Comparative genomics Genome annotation Ontology Plant anatomy Terpene synthase BFO, Basic Formal Ontology","CARO, Common Anatomy Reference Ontology","CL, Cell Ontology","FMA, Foundational Model of Anatomy","GO, Gene Ontology","GCP, Generation Challenge Program","ID, identifier","MGCSC, Maize Genetics Cooperation Stock Center","NASC, European Arabidopsis Stock Centre","OBO, Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies","OBOF, Open Biomedical Ontologies flat file format","PO, Plant Ontology","QTL, quantitative trait locus","RO, Relation Ontology","PATO, Phenotypic Quality Ontology","SGN, Sol Genomics Network","SVN repository, Subversion repository","TPS, terpene synthase","TAIR, The Arabidopsis Information Resource","URI","Uniform Resource Identifier","URL, Uniform Resource Locator","OWL, web ontology language","OWL-DL, Web ontology language sublanguage named for its correspondence with descriptive logics"],"sieverID":"f027f38b-33c0-4196-972b-c9b18922cb27","pagecount":"23","content":"The Plant Ontology (PO; http://www.plantontology.org/) is a publicly available, collaborative effort to develop and maintain a controlled, structured vocabulary ('ontology') of terms to describe plant anatomy, morphology and the stages of plant development. The goals of the PO are to link (annotate) gene expression and phenotype data to plant structures and stages of plant development, using the data model adopted by the Gene Ontology. From its original design covering only rice, maize and Arabidopsis, the scope of the PO has been expanded to include all green plants. The PO was the first multispecies anatomy ontology developed for the annotation of genes and phenotypes. Also, to our knowledge, it was one of the first biological ontologies that provides translations (via synonyms) in non-English languages such as Japanese and Spanish. As of Release #18 (July 2012), there are about 2.2 million annotations linking PO terms to >110,000 unique data objects representing genes or gene models, proteins, RNAs, germplasm and quantitative trait loci (QTLs) from 22 plant species. In this paper, we focus on the plant anatomical entity branch of the PO, describing the organizing principles, resources available to users and examples of how the PO is integrated into other plant genomics databases and web portals. We also provide two examples of comparative analyses, demonstrating how the ontology structure and PO-annotated data can be used to discover the patterns of expression of the LEAFY (LFY) and terpene synthase (TPS) gene homologs.Analyses of vast data sets from genetic and genomic studies have the potential to improve our understanding of species evolution, development and the molecular basis of traits of economic relevance. To realize this potential, plant scientists must be able to connect the spatial and temporal expression patterns of genes and gene products to their molecular functions, their roles in biological processes and gene-gene interactions. Associating qualitative and quantitative phenotypes derived from mutants and breeding populations with the functional and expression aspects of the genome helps to identify candidate genes and regions of the genome that may be associated with traits of interest. Sequenced genomes are available for an ever-growing number of Viridiplantae species ranging from algae, e.g. Volvox carteri (Prochnik et al. 2010) and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Merchant et al. 2007), and bryophytes, e.g. Physcomitrella patens (Rensing et al. 2008), to many angiosperms, such as Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, 2000), Populus trichocarpa (Tuskan et al. 2006) and Oryza sativa (Goff et al. 2002, Yu et al. 2002). This now makes it possible to connect genotype to phenotype for intraspecific genetic diversity comparison and also allows interspecific comparison of gene expression, phenotypes and functions of genes and gene family members.Effective interspecific comparisons at the genome scale demand a common vocabulary (ontology), structured in a way that permits computer-aided reasoning about relationships among entities of different sorts. Ontologies have become indispensable tools for data curation and analysis in the life sciences (Blake andBult 2006, Jensen andBork 2010). Basically, an ontology is a structured vocabulary that provides a set of terms to describe the types of entities within a given domain and the relationships among these entities. Terms from an ontology are associated with genes or gene products through annotation (or 'tagging') of data with ontology labels. Because the same term names are used to annotate diverse bodies of data, the results can then be used to serve integration and analysis across multiple studies or species. For example, a user can compare genes expressed in a soybean (legume) pod with those expressed in a silique of an Arabidopsis plant. Though defined differently in a species-specific context, both pod and silique are synonyms of fruit in the Plant Ontology (PO) and it may be of interest to investigate what makes a pod different from a silique or how they are similar (note: throughout the paper, ontology terms and relations are printed in italics). The PO organizes the conventional knowledge, such as that about types of fruit, into a common structured vocabulary that alerts a researcher (and also a computer) that both pod and silique share similar characteristics of the PO term fruit.Widespread use of ontologies in the life sciences began with the development of the Gene Ontology (GO) in the late 1990s. Recognizing that many genes and proteins are conserved in most or all living cells, developers of the GO made the first significant effort to develop a unified vocabulary to describe the attributes of gene products in species-neutral fashion (Ashburner et al. 2000, Gene Ontology Consortium 2012). The GO Consortium developed a standard protocol for annotating genes with ontology terms, laying the foundation for the first serious effort to unify molecular and cell biology in a computationally useful way, thereby radically improving the process of computationally driven functional annotation and comparative analysis of genes and gene products.Early on, major plant genome sequencing and annotation projects adopted the GO approach for annotating the A. thaliana and O. sativa genomes (Garcia-Hernandez et al. 2002, Ware et al. 2002, Haas et al. 2003). Researchers soon realized that in order to utilize the full potential of data sets arising from genomic, proteomic, metabolomic and other '-omics' studies, additional controlled vocabularies were needed to describe the anatomical spatial location, temporal growth and developmental stages of plant parts and whole plants. Therefore, as the potential for comparative biology grew, the PO was developed to provide terms that describe flowering plant anatomy and morphology (Ilic et al. 2007) and development stages (Pujar et al. 2006) in model plant species, in order to annotate gene expression and phenotype data sets more accurately (Avraham et al. 2008). For example, the GO biological process term C4 photosynthesis (GO:0009760) in maize differs from C3 photosynthesis (narrow synonym of reductive pentose-phosphate cycle; GO:0019253) in a rice plant by localizing and coordinating carbon fixation (GO:0015977) in plastids (GO:0009536) found in two different cell types. In maize, C4 photosynthesis is coordinated between the mesophyll cell (PO:0004006) and the cells of the bundle sheath (PO:0006023); whereas, in rice, C3 photosynthesis occurs only in the mesophyll cell. Therefore, if we simply look at the GO annotations of the rice and maize gene products without the context of the mesophyll/bundle sheath cell type specificity provided by the PO, a user will not be able to differentiate the physiological and anatomical significance. The PO makes it possible to extend GO functional annotations to plant molecular biology data, thereby linking known gene functions annotated to GO terms with PO annotations to spatialand temporal-specific gene product expression and observed phenotypes.Since the initial development of the PO for the model plant species A. thaliana, O. sativa and Zea mays (Jaiswal et al. 2005, Avraham et al. 2008, Ilic et al. 2008), the scope of the PO project has expanded to develop the controlled vocabularies required to annotate anatomy and development stages of all green plants, thus covering a wide array of new plant model species. In its current form, the PO bridges diverse experimental data derived from genetics, molecular and cellular biology, taxonomy, botany and genomics research. The power of the PO lies in its ability to resolve disparities, not only between the various terminologies used by researchers in different genomics projects, but also between the names classically used by different groups of investigators to describe plant anatomy. As such, the PO serves as a common reference ontology of plant structures and development stages.A recent review of the utility of ontologies to plant science describes the challenges in adopting such a unified approach, as well as the organizing principles behind the development of the PO (Walls et al. 2012a). Here, in contrast, we focus on detailing the composition of the plant anatomical entity branch of the PO, its guiding principles for development and expansion, and applications of data annotation, integration and analysis.We provide examples of how the PO is integrated into many other plant genomics databases and web portals, and describe associated online tools for curation and data mining. Furthermore, we demonstrate the power of the PO for comparative plant anatomy and genomics by showing how the PO annotations of the LEAFY (LFY) and terpene synthase (TPS) gene homologs can be explored for inter-and intraspecific comparative analysis. This article describes the PO in reference to Release #18 (July 2012).In its original form, describing anatomy and growth stages for monocots and dicot plants (primarily A. thaliana, Z. mays and O. sativa), the PO (Avraham et al. 2008) was the first multispecies anatomy ontology among the various biological ontologies. The multispecies anatomy ontologies that have been developed since then include the Teleost Anatomy Ontology (Dahdul et al. 2010), and Uberon, a multispecies anatomy ontology primarily covering metazoans (Mungall et al. 2012). By providing both species-neutral terminology and references to taxon-specific terminology for the respective taxonomic kingdoms, the PO and Uberon enable research that compares anatomy, development and phenotypes across species. However, developing such ontologies presents challenges due to a diversity of phenotypic characters and anatomy contributed by the evolution of species and their adaptation to different environments. Such challenges are minimal in the development of ontologies that cover a single species or group of closely related species. Encompassing the diversity of anatomy and morphology found in green plants is particularly challenging, because green plants are one of the few groups in which structures found in the gametophytic phase of the life cycle are similar to those found in the sporophytic life cycle phase. For example, non-vascular leaves (phyllids) are found in the gametophytic phase in bryophytes and the similar structure vascular leaf is found in the sporophytic phase of the vascular plant life cycle. The following sections describe in detail how the PO is organized, with emphasis on anatomy and morphology, as encompassed by the ontology term plant anatomical entity and its child terms. They include descriptions of some of the specific plant structures that are included in the PO to accommodate a wide variety of plant species, a discussion of ontology design practices and examples of how the PO and the annotated data sets can be used for comparative analyses.The PO follows the ontology standards set forth by the Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) Foundry initiative (Smith et al. 2007). The PO can be represented as a graph or tree (e.g. Fig. 1), consisting of nodes that correspond to the PO terms, joined by edges representing relationships among the terms (Smith et al. 2005). Each node in such an ontology graph consists of a standard or preferred name (often referred to as a 'term'), a scientifically correct definition with appropriate references, a list of synonyms, e.g. exact, narrow, broad or related synonyms, or foreign language synonyms, as described in Walls et al. (2012a) and, most importantly, a unique alphanumeric identifier (e.g. PO:0025034 for leaf) which is used to form a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI). Terms are related to one another by relationships such as is_a or part_of, as described below. Every term has at least one is_a relationship to a parent term.The PO consists of two branches, each with a topmost or 'root' term-plant anatomical entity and plant structure development stage, respectively. Each PO branch is organized hierarchically by means of the is_a (or subclass of) relation, by appropriately placing it under a single root term. The plant anatomical entity branch, which is the focus of this paper, describes morphological and anatomical structures such as plant organ, whole plant and plant cell, while the root term plant structure development stage describes the stages of development of plant structures (including the whole plant). A more detailed discussion of the plant structure development stage branch is the topic of a future paper.Plant anatomical entity. Plant anatomical entity and its child terms (Fig. 1) are organized as a structural anatomy ontology, in which all child terms are defined in terms of structure, including spatial information, rather than function. In addition, a number of definitions include a reference to the ontogenic development lineage. The use of the develops_from relation (Smith et al. 2005) (Fig. 1, Table 1) acknowledges the intrinsic link between a structure and its ontogenic predecessor parent structure, e.g. fruit develops_from gynoecium. The PO largely follows the Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA) (Rosse and Mejino 2003) in defining terms structurally. Nevertheless, the PO includes comments describing the common functions of some anatomical entities. For example, a comment states that xylem functions in the translocation of water and solutes and, in combination with other portions of vascular tissues, also provides structural support to the plant axis, but this statement is not an essential part of the definition of xylem. Because it is largely neutral with respect to function as well as homology (Walls et al. 2012a), the PO can be used in many different applications, including other ontologies that aim to model plant function.Like any graph tree, the nodes that are closer to the root term (towards the top of the tree) are more general terms, compared with the more specific terms that are farther from the root (Fig. 1). The direct subclasses of plant structure (highlighted in yellow in the tree, Fig. 1A; and in the tree viewer, Fig. 1B), along with numerous new mid-level terms, provide the framework into which specific plant anatomical entities can be incorporated, allowing the PO to accommodate a diverse range of agronomically important species and emerging plant models for genetic and taxonomic studies. This format allows the plant anatomical entity branch of the PO to serve as reference plant anatomy ontology for all plants, to which species and/or other specific vocabularies can be mapped. The definitions of nearly all previously existing high-level terms (those in the first two levels below the root terms) of plant anatomical entity have been modified, and several new ones have been added (see Fig. 1 and Table 2). Although many of these terms will probably never be used directly by data annotators (e.g. gene expression would not be annotated directly to collective plant structure, but instead to one of its child terms, such as shoot system or perianth), these high-level categories are essential for ontology maintenance and logical reasoning. The processes of integrating new mid-to lower level terms and improving existing definitions, driven by the addition of new plant models, are described below. The root term plant anatomical entity has three immediate child terms: (i) portion of plant substance; (ii) plant anatomical space; and (iii) plant structure. In order to follow the OBO Foundry guidelines on anatomy ontologies and to keep the plant anatomical entity organization consistent with other biomedical ontologies, these three second-level terms correspond to terms from the Common Anatomy Reference Ontology (CARO) (Haendel et al. 2007), which are in turn modeled on the FMA (Rosse and Mejino 2003). For example, the definition of portion of plant substance is 'A portion of organism substance that is or was part of a plant'. This is based upon the definition of portion of organism substance (CARO:0000004) and, thus, it prevents having to redefine the concepts and allows the user to make broad comparisons across annotated data sets in diverse species. Similarly, the definition of plant anatomical space is based upon the definition of anatomical space (CARO:0000005). For the user's convenience, the CARO terms and definitions are provided in the comment field of the respective PO term pages. The term portion of plant substance (see 'Design Practices and Naming Conventions' below for an explanation of portion of) consists of child terms that describe entities that are substances rather than structures, such as plant cuticle, cuticular wax and cutin. Plant anatomical space represents pores or other spaces that are part of a plant and surrounded by one or more anatomical structures. They are distinguished from arbitrary spaces, e.g. between adjacent leaves, in that they are generated by developmental, morphogenetic or other physiological processes. Examples of plant anatomical space include: hydathode pore, stomatal pore, stomium, axil and canal. The following section describes plant structure in more detail.Plant structure and its child terms. The child terms of plant structure make up the largest group of plant anatomical entity terms (Fig. 1, Table 2). Based on anatomical structure from the CARO (Haendel et al. 2007) and the FMA (Rosse and Mejino 2003), a plant structure in the PO includes the organism itself (whole plant) as the largest anatomical structure, while the smallest is a plant cell. As a best practice to avoid redundancy among ontologies, subcellular plant structures are represented in the cellular component branch of the GO (Gene Ontology Consortium 2012).The broad category of plant structure includes familiar plant parts such as leaf, stem, flower, fruit and seed, and also any in vitro plant structure that was derived from a plant part. Plant structure has 11 child terms, some of which-such as plant cell, portion of plant tissue, embryo plant structure and whole plant-are intuitively understandable by most plant biologists. Others, such as collective plant structure or multi-tissue plant structure, are less intuitive but are needed in order to ensure that the PO provides a complete and logically well-structured set of definitions for all the terms in the PO. They allow the ontology to support the widest possible interspecific comparisons of plant structures, make it easier to browse the ontology tree and aid in checking for errors.One important child term of plant structure is plant organ (Fig. 2, Table 2), which is defined as 'A multi-tissue plant structure that is a functional unit, is a proper part of a whole plant, and includes portions of tissues of at least two different types that derive from a common developmental pathway.' Some examples of plant organs are: plant axis, coleoptile, coleorhiza, plant gametangium, sporangium, phyllome and floral organ. Plant axis includes any axial plant organ, i.e. organs that make up the roughly linear axes of a plant, such as root and shoot axes. The child term shoot axis includes structures such as stem, branch and rhizome. The term phyllome, widely used for leaf/leaf-like organs, is defined as 'A lateral plant organ produced by a shoot apical meristem.' Its child terms include leaf, bract and prophyll, as well as the floral organs petal, sepal and tepal (Fig. 2).One of the challenges inherent in describing the anatomy of all plants is resolving issues where the same name is used to describe different plant structures. For example, the term leaf is commonly used to describe the vascular leaf structure found in angiosperms, gymnosperms and ferns, as well as the similar leaf-like non-vascular structure called a phyllid found in bryophytes. In order to differentiate the vascular and non-vascular types of leaf structures, we defined the general parent term leaf and created two child terms, non-vascular leaf (synonym: phyllid) and vascular leaf (Fig. 2). The term non-vascular leaf has no is_a child terms. It does have several part_of children, which are exclusively recognized in non-vascular leaves, such as the alar cell (not shown in Fig. 2), found at the base of a non-vascular leaf adjacent to where the leaf attaches to the stem, and costa or non-vascular leaf midvein. A number of child terms that are common to both vascular and nonvascular leaves are part_of children of the parent term leaf, e.g. leaf margin, leaf apex and leaf stomatal complex (not shown in Fig. 2). Some subtypes of vascular leaf described by the PO are adult vascular leaf, cigar leaf (as in banana plants), compound leaf, cotyledon, juvenile vascular leaf, rosette leaf and simple leaf. Together, all these terms share the common properties of the parent term vascular leaf, but, because of their individual characteristics and prevalence in the plant science literature, it was important to create specific child terms for them. A computational reasoner applied to PO-annotated data would be able to make inferences that any part_of vascular leaf is also part_of some instance of leaf.In vitro plant structures. In order to maintain logical simplicity, many anatomy ontologies deal exclusively with in vivo structures (Dahdul et al. 2010, Yoder et al. 2010, Mungall et al. 2012). However, because the use of in vitro culture is so prevalent in plant sciences, there is a need to annotate gene expression for in vitro plant structures. Thus it was important to include in vitro plant structure as a direct child term of plant structure in the PO. This presented a challenge, however, because every in vitro plant structure can be classified in at least two ways. For example, an in vitro plant cell is both a plant cell and an in vitro plant structure. Ideally, each in vitro plant structure would be included only as a direct is_a child of the respective in vivo plant structure (e.g. an in vitro plant cell as a child of plant cell). However, the information that the structure in question was grown in vitro would be lost. In order to capture this information, an exception was made to the rule of single inheritance for PO (i.e. each term must have exactly one is_a parent). In other words, some in vitro plant structure terms were assigned two is_a parent terms (e.g. culture plant cell is_a plant cell and is_a in vitro plant structure).As mentioned above, the PO was created and developed in accordance with the principles of the OBO Foundry (http:// www.obofoundry.org; Smith et al. 2007) to ensure interoperability with ontologies created in other life science domains. The OBO Foundry is a collaboration among science-based ontology developers that aims to establish a set of best practices for ontology development, with the goal of creating a suite of orthogonal, interoperable reference ontologies in the biomedical domain (Smith et al. 2007). The PO aims to follow the OBO Foundry principles (http://obofoundry.org/crit.shtml) such as having a unique identifier space, clearly delineated content that is orthogonal to other OBO Foundry ontologies and textual definitions for all terms.One of the accepted principles of the OBO Foundry is that the ontologies have a unique identifier (ID). All the term IDs in the PO are prefixed by 'PO:' and include a seven-digit, zero-padded integer. No other ontology in the OBO suite of ontologies is allowed to use the PO designation, thereby ensuring that the term identifiers are unique. This allows the PO to exist alongside all the other ontologies, and if a user sees the 'PO' designation, you always know it is from the Plant Ontology. The PO ID corresponds to a universally unique Uniform Resource Locator (URL; http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/PO_ XXXXXXX). These URLs are resolvable via the Ontobee website (http://www.ontobee.org/index.php).To ensure compatibility with other OBO Foundry ontologies, the top level (root) terms in the PO are defined on the basis of the Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) (Grenon et al. 2004, Smith 2012). The BFO is an upper-level ontology that is used to support domain ontologies developed for scientific research. There are currently >100 ontology projects using BFO as common upper-level framework, including the ontologies within the OBO Foundry (Grenon et al. 2004, Arp andSmith 2008). The BFO does not contain physical, chemical, biological or other terms that would fall within the domain of specific fields of inquiry. Instead, it provides a context for organizing the knowledge within those domains.Textual definitions and is_a completeness. Another accepted principle of the OBO foundry is that all terms in the ontology must have a textual definition. All terms in the PO have textual (human-readable) definitions. The long-term goal of the PO is for all the definitions in the ontology to be logically structured in a way that promotes both consistent formulation of the definitions and automatic reasoning. All definitions are structured as Aristotelian definitions (Rosse and Mejino 2003), which means that they are of the genus-differentia form illustrated as follows and discussed further in Walls et al. (2012a).produced by an archegonium PO : 0025126 ð Þor an embryo sac ðPO : 0025074Þ differentia ð Þ :OBO best practices require that all terms beneath the root should have is_a parents. While it is not strictly necessary to provide such parents from within the ontology, doing so ensures that the ontology is self-contained and makes it possible to formulate definitions consistently for all terms using the genus-differentia format. Other important OBO Foundry principles to which the PO adheres are the requirements that the ontology be openly available and that there is a consistent versioning system. More details can be found at the OBO Foundry Principles Page (http://obofoundry.org/crit. shtml).Relations used in the Plant Ontology. More than just a list of terms, an ontology represents relationships among the entities to which its different terms refer. The asserted relational connections between the nodes of the ontology can be used for multiple purposes, including ontology navigation and enhancement of queries across annotation data. The PO utilizes relationship assertions of seven types in addition to the basic is_a and part_of relations, namely: has_part, derives_by_ manipulation_from, develops_from, adjacent_to, participates_ in, has_participant and located_in (Table 1). Formal, logical definitions of these relations can be found in the Relation Ontology (RO; Smith et al. 2005). The meanings of participate-s_in and has_participant used in the PO are more restrictive than the RO definitions. The relation derives_by_ manipulation_from is a special case of the RO relation derives_from. The PO maintains a Wiki page describing the relations in much more detail (http://wiki.plantontology.org/ index.php/Relations_in_the_Plant_Ontology). Where possible, the PO uses the OWL version of the RO: http://code.google. com/p/obo-relations/), which is a descendant of the Smith et al. (2005) RO, and itself makes use of BFO relations. A new version of BFO is currently under development (http://code.google. com/p/bfo/), and in the future the relations will be incorporated in a single file with BFO (Smith 2012).Design practices and naming conventions. The design of the PO follows the OBO Foundry principles and guidelines (http:// www.obofoundry.org/crit.shtml), as well as best practices of the ontology community, as described in Walls et al. (2012a). The particular needs of describing plant anatomical entities dictate several additional practices that are described in more detail below.To ensure biologically correct definitions and consistent use of terms in annotation, a number of nomenclature rules were followed in the development of the plant anatomical entity branch of the PO. First, term names for some common plant parts such as cell, tissue, organ, zygote and embryo are prefixed with 'plant' and thus referred to as plant cell, portion of plant tissue, plant organ, etc. This helps to differentiate them from terms of the same name in other non-plant ontologies and vocabularies, and ensures that their meaning is accurately reflected outside the context of plants. Secondly, following the practice laid down in the FMA (Rosse and Mejino 2003), several terms use the prefix 'portion of' in their names, e.g. portion of plant tissue, and many of its child terms. Although such use of the 'portion of' phrase is not part of the standard language of biologists, it is important as a means of distinguishing between the physical object that is a portion of plant tissue and a description of the corresponding tissue type. Many tissue types do not have 'portion_of' in their term name, because their single-word names are widely used and already imply a physical entity rather than a description (e.g. epidermis). In such cases, more specific names were added as exact synonyms (e.g. portion of epidermal tissue). Definitions are written to make it clear when a term is referring to some arbitrary portion of tissue or to the maximal portion of tissue in some given plant structure.Finally, the use of the words 'cardinal' and 'proper' have specific meanings in the context of the PO and other ontologies. The use of 'cardinal' in the term name cardinal organ part refers to the fact that these are biologically meaningful and not arbitrary parts of a plant organ. The word 'proper' is used in the PO, as in mereology (the study of parts and wholes) (Schulz et al. 2005), to denote the non-reflexive form of a relationship. When one plant anatomical entity is defined as being a 'proper part' of another, this refers to the fact that the first entity is a genuine subpart of the second, thus falling short of being identical. This distinction is important because the part_of relation (as defined by the RO) is reflexive, so special cases when it is not meant to be reflexive must be specified.The PO collaborates with a number of other ontologies, especially with the GO (Gene Ontology Consortium 2012), the well-established ontology widely used for the annotation of gene product function. Following OBO Foundry ontology principles, the PO strives for orthogonality between the domains of GO and those of the PO. The GO is made up of three branches: molecular function, biological process and cellular component. The domain of the plant anatomical entity branch of the PO includes plant structures ranging from the plant cell and larger, while the parts of a plant cell, for instance the chloroplast, are described in the cellular component branch of the GO.The GO branch biological process encompasses many terms that describe processes that occur during plant development, e.g. flower morphogenesis (GO:0048439) and seed germination (GO:0009845). As far as possible, the GO plant development terms are composed using terms from Mungall et al. (2011). For example, the GO biological process term shoot system development:G0 :0022621 ! shoot system development :Equivalent : GO : 0048856 ! anatomical structure development and RO : 0002296 ! results in development of some 'PO : 0009006 ! shoot system PO and GO are working together to align these two ontologies systematically through an ongoing process of suggesting new terms and modifications of existing plant-specific GO terms through the GO SourceForge tracker (https://source forge.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=36855&atid=440764). In the future, the GO intends to use PO in combination with TermGenie (http://go.termgenie.org/), a template-based, reasoner-assisted ontology term generation tool, for creation of new plant-related terms (Chris Mungall, personal communication).Arabidopsis annotations to GO terms are developed by the TAIR (Berardini et al. 2004, Lamesch et al. 2012) through their curation pipeline and are added to the PO database at each PO release through an automated pull process from the GO FTP site (ftp://ftp.geneontology.org/pub/go/gene -associations/). Recent advances in gene annotation efforts in other plants such as rice (Hamada et al. 2011, Nagamura et al. 2011, Sakurai et al. 2011), barley (Mochida et al. 2011), maize (Sekhon et al. 2011, Kakumanu et al. 2012) and Physcomitrella (Lang et al. 2005, Rensing et al. 2007, Rensing et al. 2008, Wolf et al. 2010, Timmerhaus et al. 2011), among many others, are contributing to the body of knowledge about plant gene functional annotations, but, since these annotations are not yet cross-referenced to PO terms, this information is not yet available through the PO database.Similar to the GO approach above, developers of the PO and the Trait Ontology (TO) (Jaiswal et al. 2002, Yamazaki andJaiswal, 2005) are working to align these two ontologies. It is being accomplished by creating cross-references in the TO to PO terms and their qualities or attributes from the Phenotypic Quality Ontology (PATO; Gkoutos et al. 2004). For example, the trait leaf color (TO:0000326) is referenced as PO leaf (PO:0025034) bearing the quality color (PATO:0000014) (Pankaj Jaiswal, personal communication).To maintain orthogonality, the PO re-uses terms from existing ontologies in definitions wherever appropriate. As described above and in Walls et al. (2012a), many plant anatomical entity terms draw on the CARO (Haendel et al. 2007). Although the CARO structural classification is based on the FMA, a human anatomy ontology (Rosse and Mejino 2003), many of its terms are defined broadly enough to encompass plants. Ongoing discussions with CARO curators ensure the continued compatibility of the CARO and the PO, and enhance the possibilities for comparative research across eukaryotes.The PO term plant cell presents a special example of interactions among OBO Foundry ontologies. It is an important principle that ontologies in the OBO Foundry should have clearly specified and delineated content that is orthogonal to other OBO Foundry ontologies (http://www.obofoundry.org/ crit.shtml). The GO term cell is a child term of cellular component, and the definition of plant cell in the PO references cell in the GO as its parent term. However, most organisms, including plants, have cells of specialized types that are considered an essential part of their anatomy. To standardize descriptions of cell types across species, the Cell Ontology (CL) was developed as the reference ontology for the representation of in vivo cell types from all biology (Meehan et al. 2011). Previously, the CL contained its own parallel hierarchy of plant cell terms that were cross-referenced with the PO. This, however, created serious problems in maintaining two parallel ontologies. Therefore, it was decided that the CL would import the plant cell term and all its child terms from the PO and retain the original PO identifiers, relationships and definitions. This allows maintenance of terms for plant cell types to remain within the control of plant experts, but provides for cross-ontology interoperability.Since April 2009, the plant anatomical entity branch of the PO has grown from 808 terms to 1,203, a 49% increase, and from describing nine plant species to the current 22 species (http:// www.plantontology.org/docs/release_notes/index.html). All terms have text definitions, with many refinements of those from the initial project. During this period of time, the scope and amount of genomics data represented in the PO have increased from about 45,000 data objects (genes, mRNA, proteins, etc.) annotated in 2009 to more than 110,000 data objects in 2012 (Table 3). These data representations result in about 2.2 million individual annotations, or links between PO terms and the genomic data, as many of the data objects are annotated to more than one PO term.Two of the major challenges in developing the PO are (i) the need to define high-level terms in such a way that they are appropriate for all instances in all taxa and (ii) dealing with differences in vocabulary usage among groups working on different taxa. The process of expanding the coverage and enriching the PO to provide new terms for plant anatomical entities is highly collaborative, involves many different database groups and user communities (below and Table 4) and is continuously evolving. Such collaborative developments help to ensure that PO terms and definitions can be used across different taxa.The sections below detail four collaborative projects, which resulted in term enrichment and expanding the plant anatomical entity branch of the PO. The PO SourceForge tracker (http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=76834&atid=8355 55) is the main avenue for new term requests and/or modifications and collaborations for larger scale projects. Outreach workshops and presentations have been held at national and international conferences, and in-house workshops are held with specific groups of domain experts such as wood anatomists (Lens et al. 2012). For more information, see the PO outreach page (http://wiki.plantontology.org/index.php/POC_ Outreach_Events).Flora of North America Glossary. A significant source of new terms and synonyms for existing terms was a collaboration with the curators of the Flora of North America Glossary (http:// huntbot.andrew.cmu.edu/hibd/departments/DB-INTRO/Intro FNA.shtml), which resulted in the addition of 333 new synonyms and 143 unique new term requests (Walls et al. 2012a, Walls et al. 2012b). The list of mappings between the PO and the FNA can be downloaded from the PO Subversion (SVN) repository (http://palea.cgrb.oregonstate.edu/viewsvn/Poc/ trunk/mapping2po/FNAglossary2po.txt?view=log) and the list of new terms and synonyms can be downloaded from Source Forge (http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail &aid=3376762&group_id=76834&atid=835555).Solanaceae and other tuber-bearing plants. Although the PO has been developed as a species-neutral ontology for plants, certain specific introductions and annotation requirements from new species, such as those bearing tubers, challenged the concept of neutrality. Detailed revisions were made to the plant anatomical entity term tuber and its is_a and part_of children, at the request of the Sol Genome Network (SGN; Bombarely et al. 2011) (Fig. 3). The revision of the term tuber demonstrates how the PO can be used to describe the parts of a complex structure in a species-independent manner, and yet still accurately describe agronomically important crop plants of interest to plant breeders. A number of new terms were created to allow specific annotations of potato tuber structures, but they were added in a way that does not limit their use exclusively to potatoes, i.e. using species-neutral primary names with narrow synonyms that are specific to potatoes. For example, 'potato eye' is a narrow synonym of subterranean tuber axillary vegetative bud. Many of the PO terms describing the parts of the subterranean tuber are child terms of portion of plant tissue. This applies, for example, to subterranean tuber epidermis (synonym: young potato tuber skin), subterranean tuber periderm (synonym: mature potato tuber skin) and subterranean tuber pith (synonym: water core). The use of synonyms such as 'young potato tuber skin' permits ontology builders to maintain strict naming conventions, while allowing plant breeders to search for the terms they need using familiar phraseology. At the same time, the use of speciesneutral primary names makes the ontology useful for groups working on other species as well as supporting interspecies comparisons. For example, the tuber terms that were added to the PO for potatoes can be applied to Dioscorea species (yams) with no modifications. These revisions facilitate research and annotation of the spatial-and temporal-specific profiles of expressed genes determined in the recently sequenced genome of the potato (Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium 2011), one of the world's most important, non-grain food crops.Physcomitrella patens and non-seed plants. Sequencing of the P. patens genome (Rensing et al. 2008) has facilitated the creation of many new expression data sets for P. patens, the annotation of which created a need for PO terms to describe plant structures and development stages found in mosses. This was necessary, for example, for comparing the gene functions and Fig. 3 The terms in the plant anatomical entity branch of the PO describe plant structures specific to a certain species, while remaining species-neutral. PO terms are supplemented with species-specific synonyms that allow users such as plant breeders to maintain their own vocabulary and relate their terms to the PO hierarchy. (A) An example of using PO to annotate species-specific structures such as the potato tuber anatomy. The parts of any subterranean tuber can be described processes essential for various non-vascular plant structures found in mosses with those of the functional and structural homologs found in angiosperms. PO developers worked with researchers from the Rensing lab (http://plantco.de/) and the Physcomitrella model species database (cosmoss; http://www. cosmoss.org/) to incorporate anatomical terms for P. patens into the PO. The cosmoss curators suggested 63 new plant structure terms (Supplementary Table S1), along with suggestions for definitions, references and mappings to the PO. In order to integrate the non-angiosperm terms, an additional 44 terms describing the anatomy of bryophytes, lycophytes (club and spike mosses) and pteridophytes (ferns) were added at the same time, to support these taxonomic clades. Many of the new terms, e.g. seta, peristome and gametophore, are found not only in P. patens but also throughout the mosses and other bryophytes, and some even in vascular plants (e.g. rhizoid, exothecium or archesporial cell). In keeping with the objective that the PO should be species-neutral, some of the term names and definitions suggested by cosmoss were modified slightly to ensure that they would be applicable to any plant in which the corresponding structure is found (Supplementary Table S1).Musa spp. (banana and plantain) and other monocots outside the Poaceae family. Banana and plantain (Musa spp.) are important tropical fruit crops worldwide. In collaboration with the Generation Challenge Program (GCP; http://www. generationcp.org/) and Bioversity International, 31 new terms were created, and synonyms were added to several existing terms, to accommodate the anatomical descriptions of banana and plantain species that are widely used by plant breeders and collection curators (Supplementary Table S2).Similar to the potato tuber terms, many of the structures found in Musa are also present in other taxa, particularly in other non-grass monocots. Some terms were already in the PO, and simply required the addition of Musa-specific synonyms, e.g. 'male bud' as a synonym for inflorescence bud. Examples of some of the terms that were added are free tepal, fused collective tepal structure and cigar leaf.The Plant Ontology is a Resource for Plant BiologistsThe online PO database provides ontology terms and definitions along with the associated 'annotations' (links) as described by Hill et al. (2008), between the PO terms and data sourced from numerous plant genomics data sets (Table 3). PO Release #18 (July 2012) contains about 2.2 million annotations linking PO terms to >110,000 unique data objects representing genes, gene models, proteins, RNAs, germplasm and quantitative trait loci (QTLs). These data are currently contributed by 11 different data sources ( In some cases, annotation files are a result of special projects devoted to the creation of specific data sets; in others, the creation of annotations results through an ongoing collaboration with more or less regular updates to the data sets housed at the PO. An example of the former is the collaborative project between the Rensing lab (http://plantco.de/), the moss model organism database (cosmoss; http://www.cosmoss.org/) and the PO project. In addition to the new and modified PO terms described above for the moss P. patens (see above and Supplementary Table S1), we have added some 26,000 gene expression data points for moss anatomy and development, resulting in approximately 82,000 new annotations. Future efforts will include continuing to enrich PO with bryophyte terms and additional gene expression annotations.Ontology terms and the associated annotation data sets can be accessed through the web browser (Carbon et al. 2009) on the PO home page (http://plantontology.org) (Fig. 4) or from any term page. Users can browse for terms or annotation data directly using the tree view, or can 'Search PO' for specific terms or genes of interest. Fig. 4A presents an example page for the term plant egg cell with the three main panels. The 'Term Information panel' (Fig. 4B) contains information about the term such as the term name, accession (ID), any synonyms, the definition and comment. The 'Term Lineage panel' (Fig. 4C) shows the location of the term in the PO hierarchy, in either tree format or graphical view. The numbers/counts in parentheses next to the term name is a hyperlink to the data annotations page (Fig. 4E) for that term and its direct is_a children. These links will take the researcher to the annotation data source for more information (Fig. 4F). For example, the term plant egg cell and its child terms have 175 annotations to data objects, which in turn are linked out to the source database (TAIR) and to the relevant gene product page in GO, if that information is available (Fig. 4G). At the bottom of the term page in the 'External References' panel (Fig. 4D) is a link to the SourceForge Tracker entry (https://sourceforge.net/ tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3030032&group_id=768 34&atid=835555) related to that specific term. The user can follow that link to view the history of the term and definition and to make comments or suggestions. In future versions of the PO, many of the term pages will also have links to images of the relevant plant parts (including images specific to particular developmental stages).The ontology files for download are accessible in two formats: Open Biomedical Ontologies flat file format (OBOF; http://oboformat.org) and Web Ontology Language (OWL; http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/) format from the links provided on the PO Download webpage (http://plantontology.org/download/download.html). Ontology files and bulk annotation data files are available for download from the SVN repository (http://palea.cgrb.oregonstate.edu:/svn/ Poc). The ontology (but currently not the annotations) is also available via web services as described below.Glossary, translations and subsets. Three additional features have been added to the PO to enhance the ability of users to access the ontology and the associated data. In addition to the ontology browser, another means of accessing terms, synonyms and definitions is by using the glossary feature (http://www.plantontology.org/db/glossary/glossary) on the PO website. Here, the user can browse through plant anatomical entity child terms alphabetically or search for a specific term of interest. In order to increase the utility and acceptance of the PO for plant scientists in other countries and nonnative English-speaking researchers, Spanish and Japanese translations have been added for the term names in the plant anatomical entity branch of the PO and are available on the online ontology browser (Fig. 4) as well as in the downloadable ontology files. Several subsets of PO terms have been created to help make the corresponding terms more easily accessible to specific groups of users (Supplementary Table S3). Subsets provide a way for users to search for terms relevant to a particular topic or taxon, and they also provide a means of quality control. For example, a user trying to choose between two related terms can select the term tagged to the most appropriate taxonomic subset. Subsets can also be used to create pared-down versions of the PO-also known as 'slims'-that contain a subset of ontology terms. Existing subsets in the PO have been complemented with new subsets which include: Plant Functional Traits (general terms needed for plant ecology, added at the request of TraitNet; http://traitnet.ecoinformatics.org/); terms used for banana (Musa); terms used for potato (Solanum tuberosum); and separate subsets for terms used for angiosperms, gymnosperms, pteridophytes and bryophytes. In future releases of the PO, taxonomic subsets may be enhanced with the use of only_in_taxon or never_in_taxon relations [Deegan (nee Clark) et al. 2010] along the lines described in Walls et al. (2012a).PO web services. Developers who wish to use the PO in mobile or desktop applications, such as those for annotation and curation tools, can now access terms, synonyms, definitions and comments using web services. The PO has developed its own web services, to complement other existing services. The PO web services (see link below) were built with Hypertext Preprocessor (PHP; http://www.php.net/), a widely used general-purpose scripting language, model aspects of RESTful software architecture (Fielding 2000), and provide PO data encoded in JSON format (http://www.json.org), a widely used standard for providing data over the internet. There are two types of PO services available at this time: (i) the short and quick 'term search web service' (Fig. 5A) provides term name and synonym search results, given a partial term name or synonym. For example, a search for 'basal' will return multiple terms and/or synonyms with 'basal' in their names, such as axillary hair basal cell and basal flower; and (ii) the web service providing extensive details on multiple pieces of term data, given a PO accession ID (Fig. 5B). A search for 'PO:0000252' will return the term name, aspect, definition, comment and any synonyms for the PO term endodermis. These services could be used, for example, in applications that allow users to provide PO terms as keywords for image annotation, gene and phenotype curation, adding mark-ups on scientific literature and help autofill/autocomplete the database query searches, etc. Future development will include a web service delivering PO annotation data in a similar manner. Full documentation is available on the Plant Ontology website documentation page: (http://www.plantontology.org/docs/otherdocs/web_ services_guide.html).BioPortal web services (Whetzel et al. 2011) also offer PO web services as part of a larger set of methods providing access to ontological data, and generally return data in XML, although JSON format was more recently made available for most of their methods. In addition to serving term data, they provide relationship and hierarchy data connecting terms in the ontologies that they host. The iPlant's Simple Semantic Web Architecture and Protocol (SSWAP; http://sswap.info/) (Gessler et al. 2009, Nelson et al. 2010) offers the PO as a complex set of graph-based query services based on the OWL sublanguage (OWL-DL; http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/) and resource description protocols.The power of the PO is its ability to link anatomical and morphological descriptions to genomics and genetic data sets A search for 'PO:0000252' will return the name, aspect, definition, comment and any synonyms for the PO term endodermis. Full documentation is available on the Plant Ontology website page (http:// www.plantontology.org/docs/otherdocs/web_services_guide.html). and to facilitate data mining and inter-and intraspecific comparative genomics analysis. This can be most effective if ontology terms are integrated in metadata annotations of plant structures (spatial aspects) and growth and developmental stages (temporal aspects) in gene expression or phenotype studies. For example, gene expression analysis annotated to plant anatomical entities across a wide range of taxa can be combined with taxonomic studies to compare the patterns of expression of gene orthologs.PO hierarchy and relationships facilitate comparative genomics analyses of the LFY/ZFL homologs. One advantage of an ontology, compared with a simple glossary, is that by making use of the relationships between the terms (Fig. 6, Table 1), a user (including a computer) may explore up and down the ontology graph to learn more about plant anatomical entities and their constituent parts (through part_of relations) and/or their ontogenic development, (through the develops_from relation). For example, ear floret is part_of ear spikelet and flower develops_from flower primordium (Fig. 6A). Additionally, you can query the graph for annotations by entering at any level, because the annotations flow through certain ontology relationships (Fig. 6B, Table 1). This allows annotations assigned directly to a term to be percolated to the is_a or part_of parent terms, but not through the develops_from relation. For example, the A. thaliana gene AtLFY was annotated to the inflorescence and flower (Fig. 6B) terms based on mutant phenotype and gene expression studies, and its role in the regulation of flower and inflorescence development (Schultz and Haughn 1991, Weigel et al. 1992, Mandel and Yanofsky 1995, Siriwardana and Lamb 2012, Yamaguchi et al. 2012). Because inflorescence and flower are child terms (is_a children) of reproductive shoot system, it can be inferred that AtLFY is expressed in a reproductive shoot system. Thus, the ontology structure can guide the user to find the AtLFY annotation on reproductive shoot system, a less granular term in the ontology, to facilitate comparative genomics analysis with species that have a reproductive shoot system but not flowers (such as gymnosperms).In a search for annotations for the LFY homologs from maize ZmZFL1 and ZmZFL2, identified in the phylogenetic analysis (Bomblies et al. 2003, Bomblies andDoebley 2006) (Fig. 6C), a user could find annotations on the inflorescence and flower terms, even though in this case these annotations were assigned to a specific flower subtype called ear floret. The ZmZFL genes were annotated to more specific unique terms based on their known roles in regulating the process of floral organ identity and pattern formation, and development of inflorescence architecture. They also regulate flowering time by regulating the transition of the vegetative shoot apical meristem to reproductive shoot apical meristem (Bomblies et al. 2003, Bomblies andDoebley 2006).A user, while looking for these LFY/ZFL annotations, may also search for known rice (OsRFL) (Rao et al. 2008) and moss Physcomitrella (PpLFY1 and PpLFY2) (Tanahashi et al. 2005) homologs, based on the gene trees such as those provided by the Gramene database (Fig. 6C). The PO database may or may not contain annotations to OsRFL and the PpLFY genes, but one could hypothesize that OsRFL may be associated with spikelet floret and inflorescence (synonym: panicle in rice), based on the evidence from the homologs. and which we find is true on review of the literature. Though OsRFL functions in a manner partially similar to AtLFY (Chujo et al. 2003) and the ZmZFL genes, it has unique expression patterns and regulates an additional set of interacting genes (Rao et al. 2008). The PpLFY genes cannot be compared in this manner because mosses do not have inflorescences like those found in angiosperms, suggesting that the Physcomitrella genes may play a different role in moss plant development. Indeed, the PpLFY genes are known to control sporophyte development, by regulating the first zygotic cell division (annotations not shown), and PpLFY1 is expressed in the sporophyte (Tanahashi et al. 2005).The combination of characterized genes, e.g. the LFY homologs and their annotations to PO terms in the ontology tree, allows users to address questions such as: 'Are homologs annotated to the same PO terms describing similar gene expression profiles?' If not, can their annotation tell something about the (dis)similarities between the structures found in the species, such as flowers of monocot grass plants vs. the dicot Arabidopsis? Also, similar to the example mentioned above on C 4 photosynthesis, if the gene products were annotated only with the GO, it would have been difficult to question how homologs with the same or similar function (e.g. transcription factor activity; synonym of GO:0000988) regulate the development of taxon-specific plant structures in grasses (rice and maize), Arabidopsis and moss plants. Therefore, by adding the spatial and temporal annotations from PO to the existing GO annotations, it is possible to find answers to such questions.Comparative analysis of the terpene synthase gene family with PO annotations. Often plant genomes contain sets of related genes as members of a gene family. The terpene synthase (TPS) gene family is well studied and characterized (Aubourg et al. 2002, Chen et al. 2011, Tholl and Lee 2011). These families can be identified as arising due to ancient or recent genome duplications and characterized by synteny across phylogenetically distant homologs. Many such homologs may have similar functions, such as enzymatic activities, but have clearly diverged in different lineages (Chen et al. 2011). Tholl and Lee (2011) characterized the genomic organization of the 32 Arabidopsis enzymes of the core biosynthetic pathways producing the 5-carbon building blocks of terpenes. The PO terms and annotation database allows us to ask questions such as: do all the homologs and TPS gene family members have similar plant anatomical entity annotations or do they differ based on TPS subgene family and how do the annotations differ between the same or different species?In order to address these questions, we first resolved a gene family tree of some the known TPS gene family members from five species (A. thaliana, Z. mays, O. sativa, Selaginella moellendorfii and P. patens) (Fig. 7; Supplementary Table S4). The tree includes 33 A. thaliana TPS gene family members (Tholl and Lee 2011), to ensure the gene families are classified according to the known nomenclature. Based on the classification of TPS genes provided for A. thaliana (Tholl and Lee 2011), five major groups (TPS-a, b c, e/f and g) of TPS genes were identified in this set (indicated on the tree, Fig. 7).The TPS-a family had a clear subdivision with the dicot (A. thaliana) in the TPS-a1 subgroup and the monocots (Z. mays and O. sativa) in the TPS-a2 subgroup (Fig. 7). The moss, P. patens, was limited to the TPS-e/f subgroup, along with three S. moellendorfii genes, while the majority of the S. moellendorfii genes are in the TPS-h group (not shown in Fig. 7). TPS-g had representation from A. thaliana, Z. mays and O. sativa. These results agree with the groupings of the TPS gene family found by Tholl and Lee (2011). The tree was then probed by overlaying the plant anatomical entity annotations hosted currently in the PO database (Fig. 7). The PO database currently includes a large number of annotations to the members of the Z. mays and Arabidopsis TPS families, but lacks extensive data linking TPS homologs in O. sativa and S. moellendorfii.Based on the current set of annotations, we found that A. thaliana TPS genes for each of the subgroups indicate a widespread divergence of tissue-and cell type-specific expression profiles, while the Z. mays genes in the subgroups TPS-c and a2 indicate consistency in expression among the paralogs. The A. thaliana TPS-g gene AT1G61680 is preferentially annotated to reproductive plant structures compared with the TPS-g homologs from Z. mays that are preferentially expressed in vegetative structures. Also evident from this analysis was that the Z. mays TPS-a2 genes are expressed in the vegetative structures leaves and primary root and in the reproductive structures floret and anther, while the A. thaliana TPS-a1 family is more commonly expressed in the parts of the flower and inflorescence. From these results, guided by the placement of TPS homologs in the gene family tree, one can hypothesize about gene expression in other closely related plant species, such as O. sativa and other monocots, and S. moellendorfii. For example, a user might expect to find the expression of the S. moellendorfii TPS genes in the non-vascular leaves. A recent study by Li and co-workers (2012) characterized the TPS genes in the above-ground portions of plants after treatment with a fungal elicitor, but, to our knowledge, no one has yet examined the tissue-specific expression of TPS genes in Selaginella.The Physcomitrella TPS homolog Pp1s130_5V6.1 is annotated in the PO database to four plant structures: gametophore, protenema, plant protoplast and plant spore (Fig. 7). This gene was characterized as encoding an ent-kaurene synthase, PpCPS/ KS (Hayashi et al. 2010). The gametophore is a shoot that bears non-vascular leaves (phyllids) and ultimately the megagametophyte and microgametophyte. Thus, by using the PO annotations, users can compare not only across taxa, but also across plant life cycles.The PO is widely adopted among plant genomics databases and websites (Table 4). There are too many to describe them all in detail, but we present a few representative examples here.The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR). As a founding member of the Plant Ontology Consortium, TAIR (http:// Arabidopsis.org/) has contributed to the development and use of the PO from its inception (Berardini et al. 2004, Jaiswal et al. 2005). TAIR's current participation in the PO consortium is through the large-scale contribution of PO annotations and new term requests. PO terms are used within TAIR to annotate Arabidopsis gene expression patterns reported in published research articles, along with the evidence supporting the annotations. A notable example of such a large-scale submission is the gene expression data from the multinational Arabidopsis expression atlas project (AtGenExpress) (Schmid et al. 2005) Fig. 7 Expression profiles of TPS orthologs based on annotations to plant structures in the PO. Using Arabidopsis TPS gene sequences, we identified the TPS homologs in four other species (Zea mays, Oryza sativa, Physcomitrella patens and Selaginella moellendorfii) and resolved their expression on a TPS gene family tree. Bioinformatics analysis of the expression of TPS genes was performed by aligning the genes annotated in the PO database to plant anatomical entity terms. Groups of the TPS gene family members are indicated on the gene family tree. Some branches were collapsed to avoid empty blocks due to unavailability of annotations for those genes. Branch lengths are shown on the gene tree. The iTOL (http://itol.embl.de/index.shtml) online tool was used to make this figure (Letunic andBork 2007, Letunic andBork 2011).each PO release (roughly quarterly). Although the current TAIR annotation files may be accessed through the PO SVN repository site, they are not displayed on the PO browser until the next release.The Sol Genomics Network (SGN). The SGN (http://solgenomics.net) database hosts genomic, phenotypic and taxonomic information on Solanaceae and related species, mostly from the asterid clade. As a clade-oriented database, SGN's main focus is to exploit the high level of genome conservation in the Solanaceae family for comparative querying of phenotype and genotype data. For this purpose, PO is extensively used for annotating functional genes, gene models and phenotyped germplasm, such as mutants and mapping populations. SGN also utilizes PO for scoring plant traits, thereby assisting quantitative and qualitative phenotyping in breeding programs. The two predominant species in SGN are Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) and S. tuberosum (potato), both having high-quality sequenced genomes (Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium 2011, Tomato Genome Consortium 2012). These species are important food crops and serve as models for studying developmental processes such as fruit ripening and tuberization. By including the required vocabulary for describing the plant anatomical entities and plant structure development stages in tomato and potato, the PO provides the resources to represent their counterparts in other Solanaceae species, such as Solanum melongena (eggplant), Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco) and Capsicum annuum (pepper). Overall, SGN has contributed more than 20,000 manually curated gene and phenotype annotations for 14 Solanaceae species, and plans to develop PO annotations for expression data for each published Solanaceae transcriptome in the near future.The Maize Genetics and Genomics Database (MaizeGDB). The PO grew out of its third founding member MaizeGDB's (http:// www.maizegdb.org/) contribution to maize-specific controlled vocabulary (Vincent et al. 2003). Currently, the maize data hosted in the PO database include genes, genetic stocks and gene models. Associations with 7,067 stocks and 11,436 alleles, representing 1,157 genes, are inferred from more than 800 phenotypes that are annotated with plant anatomical entity and/or plant structure development stage terms. The phenotype curation efforts have been mostly supplied by the Maize Genetics Cooperation Stock Center (Neuffer et al. 1997, Sachs 2009), with annotations to PO terms under the purview of MaizeGDB staff. A recent collaborative project involved associating PO terms to gene models from a comprehensive atlas of global transcription profiles across 60 combinations of plant structures and developmental stages of the maize inbred line B73 (Sekhon et al. 2011). In this project, each tissue sampled was annotated with both PO terms and the corresponding MaizeGDB-specific synonym. For example, the MaizeGDB record labeled 'tassel meiotic V18 B73' (http://www.maizegdb. org/cgi-bin/termrefs.cgi?id=2366346) is annotated in the PO to the plant anatomical entity term tassel inflorescence, as well as the plant structure development stage terms D pollen mother cell meiosis stage and LP.18 eighteen leaves visible. To make the gene expression data more interactive with genome data about other plants, MaizeGDB provides enhanced access to the PO. A stable reference page is provided for each expression experiment, which lists the PO terms and plant sample images. The PO database hosts about 1.5 million MaizeGDB annotations to 35,323 gene models. A new tool for phenotype query that leverages the PO is being developed at MaizeGDB. It will be similar to the tools described by Green et al. (2011) and Harnsomburana et al. (2011), which use parent and child terms, along with synonyms, to search both annotations and full text descriptions for any ontology supplied. Currently, you can search the prototype, VPhenoDBS:Maize (http://www. phenomicsworld.org) for associations to the GO, PO, and TO, returning both text data and any images associated with a phenotype.Oryzabase Database. Oryzabase (http://www.shigen.nig.ac. jp/rice/oryzabaseV4) is an integrated database of rice science in Japan (Yamazaki et al. 2010) that has been continuously providing information such as traits, genes, mutants, wild rice collections and organ-specific developmental stages for more than 15 years. Most contents are available in both English and Japanese. The phenotype information of genes, mutants and wild rice as well as anatomical terms and developmental stages are annotated using the PO (Yamazaki and Jaiswal 2005). While the features of DNA sequences and enzyme names/reactions are mostly described in a common language of English, the phenotypes and anatomical names in Japanese have been used historically. Even though today all scientists publish their articles in English, it is still difficult for non-native English speakers to describe the exact meaning of each term of the PO in English. To overcome these difficulties and enable Japanese scientists to contribute more to the development of the PO, a newly introduced 'Japanese version of the PO browser' is available at www.shigen.nig.ac.jp/plantontology/ja/ go.cgi and provides term names and keyword search of plant anatomical entities in both English and Japanese, allowing Japanese users to grasp the hierarchy of the PO intuitively.Gramene database. The Gramene database (http://www. gramene.org) is a curated online resource for plant comparative plant genomics and genetics analysis (Liang et al. 2008, Jaiswal, 2011, Youens-Clark et al. 2011). As a founding member of the PO, Gramene has integrated PO in their spatial and temporal aspects of annotation of plant gene products and QTL phenotypes to describe the spatial and temporal associations. Gramene contributes by sharing their PO annotations for about 1,700 rice genes and about 8,500 QTLs in addition to requesting new terms required for annotating cereal crop genomes. The Gramene project team, in collaboration with Plant Ensembl (http://plants.ensembl.org), mirrors PO annotation in gene pages of Plant Ensembl. In a new collaboration with the European Bioinformatics Institute's ATLAS and Array projects, the PO will be integrated into annotations of the source plant samples used in developing the microarray and RNA-seq transcriptome data sets submitted to these database archives for analysis. The Gramene project is also the primary developer of the TO for plants (Jaiswal et al. 2002, Yamazaki andJaiswal 2005). The curators at Gramene and the PO are working on aligning the TO and PO as described earlier.VirtualPlant. VirtualPlant (http://virtualplant.org) is a software platform designed to allow scientists to mine lists of genes, microarray experiments and gene networks from A. thaliana and to visualize, integrate and analyze genomic data from a systems biology perspective (Katari et al. 2010). The project's data browser provides access to the annotations and functional categories in the VirtualPlant database, including all of the A. thaliana annotations associated with PO terms.The Plant Expression Database. The Plant Expression Database (PLEXdb; http://www.plexdb.org/) is a gene expression resource for plants and plant pathogens that leverages highly parallel expression data with portals to related genetic, physical and pathway data (Wise et al. 2008). PLEXdb provides access to whole-genome transcriptome expression data sets contributed by authors for barley, maize, rice, sugarcane, wheat, Arabidopsis, citrus, cotton, grape, Medicago, poplar, soybean and tomato. The PO is used by the resource for consistent annotation of the plant samples used as RNA library source in the experiments.The standard names and definitions used in the plant anatomical entity branch of the PO constitute a controlled vocabulary that is designed to foster consistency in annotation and querying of genomics data sets such as gene expression profiles and phenotypes pertaining to plant anatomy. The consistent use of PO terms in annotations and publications will allow plant biologists and breeders to make meaningful crossdatabase and cross-species queries, in order to discover patterns of similarity and dissimilarity. This, in turn, will facilitate determination of the functions of genes and their genetic interactions associated with plant development processes, and thus their contribution to the agronomic and commercially significant traits, such as improved disease resistance and yield. Textual definitions provided for each term in the ontology serve to assist researchers in understanding the precise meaning of the term in question, while the logical definitions based on ontology relationships allow for different types of computer processing of the associated data (e.g. for purposes of cross-species integration or for data quality assurance).Future versions of the ontology will probably include additional high-level terms that will allow some unique structures to be better classified and circumscribed. For example, plant structure includes three direct child terms (plant ovary, trichome and rhizoid) that cannot be categorized as child terms of any other plant structures in the current version of the PO, because they consist of more than one type of plant structure. We will be looking at closer integration of PO and GO by cross-referencing each with the other to suggest which plant-specific GO biological processes, molecular functions and cellular components are associated with respective plant anatomical entity terms from PO. One example is the C4 photosynthesis mentioned previously, and which is specific to mesophyll cell and cells of the bundle sheath. Future enhancements to the database would include an integrated tool to query gene homologs and their annotations, links from plant structure term pages to the images in image archives annotated with the PO terms and enrichment of annotations by adding gene and gene product annotations for existing and new species.In summary, these examples demonstrate how the PO can serve as a reference ontology for all plants. The structure of plant anatomical entity and its child terms in the ontology will continue to be developed to describe and annotate plants from all taxa. This will set the stage for widening the scope of the genomic data annotated using terms from the PO and other ontologies.Analysis of terpene synthase gene families using annotations to plant anatomical entity terms Sequences in FASTA format of the 33 A. thaliana TPS gene family members (Tholl and Lee 2011) and the TPS homologs in four other species (Z. mays, O. sativa, P. patens and S. moellendorfii) were obtained from Gramene (http://www.gramene. org) and Phytozome (www.phytozome.org). The homologs retrieved from the two sources were further refined, by querying the homolog gene clusters generated in a large-scale analysis (done previously) by using a modified version of the InParanoid (O ¨stlund et al. 2010) program (Shulaev et al. 2011). For this analysis, the primary homolog hits (score 1.0) were listed, plus any additional matches with a homology score 0.25, restricting the results to the canonical form of the gene model (longest transcript/peptide). The homolog list was compiled (see Supplementary Table S4) along with their protein sequences in FASTA format. In a further analysis, the TPS homolog sequences were analyzed using ClustalW (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/) and MUSCLE (Edgar 2004) at http://www.phylogeny.fr/ to create the best alignments. Branch lengths are shown on the gene tree and the tree is rooted between the higher plants A. thaliana, Z. mays and O. sativa, and the lower plants P. patens and S. moellendorfii. These alignments were then used to generate the TPS gene family tree by using the PhyML 3.0 tool (http://www.phylogeny.fr/). A series of MySQL searches were performed on the PO database using the TPS orthologs from Arabidopsis, maize and moss. The list of PO annotations for TPS orthologs from Arabidopsis, maize and moss was overlaid on the gene family at the Interactive","tokenCount":"11462"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1111169994.json b/data/part_2/1111169994.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..83894cc449e42c5b6fdd8e38b03a42b089921401 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1111169994.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7ea3a16e641e00374a629f5e83067210","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/62dd82a1-e157-4a9c-a964-ed0867267669/retrieve","id":"-1721281512"},"keywords":["hydroxide","Copper sulphate","Copper Chloride","Fluoxynam","Iprovalicarb","Мancozeb","Famoxadone","Mephenoxam","Cymoxanil","Fluocinam","Fenamidone","Dimetomorph","Metalaxyl","Mandipropamide","Methiram","Fluazinam","etc"],"sieverID":"031c8c45-5b0b-4020-b857-84a3cea065e0","pagecount":"38","content":"Caucasus, located at the intersections of Western Asia and Eastern Europe. It borders the Black Sea to the west, Russia to the north, Turkey, Armenia to the south, and Azerbaijan to the south-east. Georgia covers a territory of 69,700 square kilometers, and population is about 3.718 million. Climat of Georgia There are almost all types of subtropical climate belt in Georgia. Their influence creates especial environment for development of agricultural crops. However at the same time, the local natural-climatic conditions are also favorable for reproduction and development of plant pests, including potato diseases.Potato is an important crop in Georgia, with approximately 20 000 ha under production, and annual per capita consumption of 55 kg. Nearly all potato is consumed fresh, and Georgians consider the crop at their \"second bread\". In Georgia, potatoes are subject to several serious diseases that are caused by various types of fungi, bacteria, viruses and phytoplasmas. Among other diseases of potato, Late Blight (Phytophthora infestans) is the most common and harmful disease. It is widespread both in lowlying and high-mountainous regions, both on early and late potatoes, and is characterized by great harmfulness.Late Blight (Phytophtora infestans)Major fungal diseases of potato in GeorgiaIn Georgia, control over Late Blight is carried out by the same methods that are accepted around the world, although it has certain features. A more effective way to combat Late Blight potatoes is through chemical fight. In Georgia, mainly fungicides are used against Late Blight, which contain the following active ingredients: Copper• Late Blight are generally more severe when potatoes are produced in monoculture, when old infected seed pieces are used for planting, and when effective diseases management programs are not developed and implemented;• Deficiency of healthy seed materials;• Faulty agrotechnics;• Poor phytosanitary conditions and risks of spreading of a large number of harmful organisms;• Lack of knowledge of LateBlight symptoms and innovative methods to control;The current situation Despite potato's importance in the diet and culture, yields remain low: at roughly 12 t / ha. One of the reasons for the low harvest is Late Blight potatoes. In general, the following factors contribute to the spread of Late Blight:• Use highly reproductive certified seed materials;• Select disease and pest resistant cultivars;• Use crop rotation and implement agrotechnological processes on time;• Spatial isolation -at least 1 km between crops of infected cultures.• Use high quality fungicides, insecticides and herbicides timely and follow the appropriate regulations;• Avoid overfeeding plants with fertilizers.• Аvoid thickened landings, stagnation of air and lack of light.• Growing potatoes in the bedsThe main ways to rectify the situationIn organic farming, especially in mountainous areas where beekeepers produce honey, mainly apply the processing of potato seeds and leaf dressing with liquid bio-organic fertilizers in order to enhance immunity. For example, organic-bacterial fertilizer \"Organika\", based on plant residues; \"Bactofert\" -organic-bacterial and mineral fertilizer with microelements based on zeolite.Biological fungicides are also used, such as \"Agrocatena\" (Bacillus subtilis BA) -Georgia, \"Phytocatena\" (Pseudomonas Fluorescens BA) -Georgia, \"Timorex gold\" (Etheric Oil of Melaleuca Alternifolia) -USA, \"Agat-25K \" (Pseudomonas aureofaciens H16 100g/ha) Russia, \"Ovnier\" (Ampelomyces quisqualis) Turkey, etc.Much attention is given to the use of potato varieties resistant to Late Blight. Georgia has been collaborating with the International Potato Center (CIP) for many years. Tested many CIP clones. Comparative resistance to Late Blight and other diseases, as well as high productivity and quality, were shown by the clone CIP \"Unika\", which was registered under the name \"Meskhuri Red\".It should be noted that in recent years, the main vector of viral infections -Aphids is already found at 1200 -1300 meters above sea level. This can be explained by global warming. In Georgia, several strains of Ralstonia Solanacearum were isolated -N62, J5A, N19, 2A. The activity of bacteriophages against them F455c, F6c, F5, F4c was established.","tokenCount":"626"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1117050057.json b/data/part_2/1117050057.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a30c544d472b3b0bd4e26d46b203bf7fbe742634 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1117050057.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"0b878214c33074a7804539786c16c1f1","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/46c0b9d3-b874-4de4-8112-5f4033d90503/retrieve","id":"-2116510098"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"4611af56-9259-458b-b698-e80a652dde05","pagecount":"6","content":"While there is extensive literature on seed systems and how they should be organized to ensure seed security for smallholder farmers, a body of research unpacking gender dynamics within these systems has just begun to emerge. This includes a portfolio of projects initiated and funded by the CGIAR Collaborative Platform for Gender Research, which was hosted within Gender Research and Coordination from 2017 2019 (Box 1). This brief summarizes this early work and provides an outlook for future research to mainstream gender analysis in seed systems development.NOVEMBER 2020To enhance the reach and effectiveness of formal breeding programs, formal seed systems must generate quality seeds that respond to the different needs and preferences of both women and men, across socioeconomic categories.Informal seed systems can reach smallholders, particularly women, where formal systems do not. Integration of formal and informal seed systems could generate synergies to improve availability and accessibility of quality seeds for both women and men.Beyond improved equity in access to seeds, equally important is to evaluate what programs, policies, and business models can improve the use and control of quality seeds, and the benefits arising from their use, in a cost effective, inclusive, and equitable way.It is time for a new paradigm in which we ask how seed systems development can be transformative and provide business opportunities for both women and men, not just how gender responsiveness makes seed systems more effective.Future research should seek to improve our understanding of gender dynamics and gendered opportunities and constraints in seed systems across different commodities, including crops, trees, fish, and livestock.Berber Kramer and Alessandra Galiè * refer to propagation material including crop varieties and seeds (botanical seeds, as well as other planting materials for crops, such as tubers and cuttings), livestock breeds and animal seed stock (young animals of any livestock and fish seed or fingerlings that can be brought into a farm, including quality semen).Existing evidence on how gender dynamics and norms interact with seed systems reveals four conditions essential to achieving seed security for women and men farmers:1. Seeds need to be of high quality and respond to the needs and preferences of both women and men from different demographic and socioeconomic categories. 2. Quality seeds must be physically available for all smallholder women and men farmers in the right place, at the right time. 3. Quality seeds must be accessible, meaning that farmers can obtain reliable information about seeds, can afford them, and can physically obtain them, regardless of gender. 4. Both women and men can use and control quality seeds and the benefits arising from their use.Quality needs to be evaluated not only in terms of physical traits such as germination rates, but also in terms of whether the seeds meet the needs and preferences of women and men farmers. Although major breeding efforts by agricultural research centers, including those in the CGIAR network, have made great strides toward improving seed quality, they have not always done so in a gender-responsive way.Formal breeding programs have traditionally focused on high-value crops and species with significant productivity and commercialization potential, and when engaging with smallholder producers, they have often interacted only with men, consequently overlooking traits preferred by women farmers or livestock keepers. Varieties and breeds with low market value but that are nonetheless important for nutrition (for example, chickens, which are often unn left out. Some new varieties may even have had traits that could disempower women, for instance by increasing their labor burden or requiring complementary inputs to which women had less access than men (Bergman Lodin et al. 2012, Teklewold et al. 2013).Gender-responsive participatory plant breeding (PPB) addresses some of these shortcomings by bringing women and men farmers and scientists together to assess and improve varieties under local farm conditions, including selecting locally preferred traits (Vernooy 2020). Varieties created through PPB can then be multiplied locally and, where govern-The CGIAR Collaborative Platform for Gender Research ( 2017 ment regulations allow, be submitted for formal registration and release. A gender-responsive approach can help change the gender norms that channel benefits to men farmers only, and ensure that women and men benefit equally from the co-developed varieties (Galie et al. 2017).Availability of quality seed: In the right place, at the right time, for both women and menFarmers need quality seeds in their rural, often very remote areas at the right time before planting in the case of crops. This timely availability is often a key challenge, particularly for women whose mobility is restricted by gender norms. Where formal seed distribution channels may not reach the most marginal rural areas, informal systems making seeds available through family and kinship networks and local markets can play an important role. Yet informal systems used more often by women may also fail to provide enough quality seed at the time of planting.Local institutions such as seed banks, cooperatives, and small seed enterprises can bridge this gap by decentralizing seed multiplication. These institutions not only improve seed supply for their communities, but also generate local employment and income, creating opportunities for development of gender-responsive seed systems. Involving women in seed production and management gives access to varieties that better meet their needs, generates extra int (Mudege et al. 2020).Unfortunately, systemic gender inequities and community bias prevent women from reaping full benefits of such initiatives (Nyantakyi-Frimpong et al. 2019). Women tend to have limited access to finance and seed processing machinery, are often unable to attract and retain skilled labor, and may suffer from delayed payments for their services. A societal bias against women in business may be further aggravated by the lack of husb he heavy burden of domestic work and other care responsibilities.Access to seed is the ability to acquire seed, as well as to receive reliable information about how and where to obtain it. Access is influenced by seed affordability and delivery mechanisms, intrahousehold For instance, women may have less access than men to the formal-sector seed sold in a local shop if they lack transport to get there and carry the seeds, cash or bargaining power to buy their preferred seeds, or knowledge about the availability of the seed, as women are not always targeted (effectively) by formal sector institutions, such as extension services or mass media.Farmer-managed systems reach women more easily, as they circumvent barriers that women face when buying seed in the formal sector (Galiè et al. 2017). They allow women to use other means to obtain seeds, for instance through seed or labor exchange, gifts, and credit (McGuire and Sperling 2016), and at more affordable prices (Mudege and Torres 2017). At the same time, informal information channels, rooted in local social networks, are often biased against women (especially young women), and this may interact with intrahousehold dynamics. For example, in Malawi, women would obtain potato seed from trusted farmers within their communities, in part to avoid husbands blaming them for crop failures due to poor-quality seed (Mudege et al. 2016).Innovations are emerging to improve women s access to seed, including public subsidies and seed voucher programs prioritizing women (Mudege et al. 2018) although these are criticized for creating artificial markets and increasing aid dependency. Private seed companies are employing new marketing efforts, including demonstration plots by women in locations accessible to women, videos featuring not only men but also women as their clients, and smaller packaging, which may better meet the needs of women, who often require less seed. However, the cost effectiveness and sustainability of these methods remains to be seen. So far, such marketing efforts have focused mainly on commercial crops and varieties for which profits are assured, not on openor self-pollinated crops, for which farmers are less likely to buy new seeds.decide what seeds to source, when, and how to use them, and then how to use the associated benefits and income. Legal regimes may regulate who can sell or replant seed. Global regulations around patents and property rights may disenfranchise women from claiming rights over seed unless they explicitly protect the rights of women farmers to access and ic material (Galiè 2013).Women play a central role in farmer-managed (infortion and use of seed are important, given their roles as household managers and custodians of seed (Khan et al. 2016). But there is little systematic evidence on gendered decision-making regarding seed use within households. Decision-making varies across crops and varieties, often in relation to market orientation. Women in Tanzania and Ethiopia, for instance, have control over seed use for food crops but not for cash crops (Amri 2010). When women do not control the income from crop sales, this may affect their ability to purchase seed (Mudege et al. 2018). Further, when different household members control the seed and the benefits from that seed, this misalignment can lead to inefficient decision-making.For women to be fully engaged in and benefit from the modern formal and informal seed systems, many structural barriers and harmful gender norms must be overcome. Building on Puskur et al. (2020), we propose a forward-looking research-for-development agenda to inform the design and implementation of gender-responsive seed systems and seed policy.Understanding the local social and gender context is critical in designing seed systems that allow equitable access to seeds and that empower women as users, producers, or traders of seed. Seed system design should be based on a systematic analysis of gender roles and dynamics and the social norms and power relations at play that determine availability, access, and use or benefits from quality seeds. This includes considering not only institutional dimensions of gender relations, such as the extent to which tion, and use is recognized and valued, but also gender norms regarding expected and appropriate roles, behavior, voice, and mobility of women. The analysis should also consider volvement in seed management translates into The answer to these questions is likely determined by community norms and practices, customary laws, and formal policies and laws.Of note is that CGIAR recently started to include livestock (beyond forage) and fish as part of seed systems. A new research agenda on gender dynamics and livestock seed needs to reframe the existing body of work on livestock-related gender issues in light of the seed systems discourse.Most previous research has focused on diagnosing where the gender gaps are in seed systems; less effort has been made to understand how to sustainably reduce these gaps. Seed policies developed without ity to access seed, and gender-responsive programming could generate positive results, but these outcomes need to be documented.A promising gender-responsive innovation is integrated seed sector development (Louwaars et al. 2013). The Integrated Seed Sector Development (ISSD) Africa program aims to build stronger linkages between formal and farmer-managed systems to generate synergies between the two. The formal sector could for instance tap into informal social networks for diffusion of certified quality seeds, and To enhance understanding of how this integrated approach benefits women and men, the ISSD Africa program has prioritized these questions in its theme on Gender and Seed Systems.We also need to know more about other innovations in agricultural value chains, not all directly related to seed systems development, that could help overcome gender-specific barriers in accessing quality seeds. Promising areas include initiatives that help advance financial inclusion and improve access to financial instruments (savings, credit, insurance); those that bundle seeds with other agricultural inputs; social and behavioral change communication to influence constraining gender norms; and those that strengthen value chains, linking farmers with markets that provide better prices for their produce. Whether these innovations are indeed gender-responsive when promoting seed security remains to be tested (Brearley and Kramer 2020).Research on how to strengthen seed systems must focus on which innovations not only reach but also benefit and empower women and men equally (Johnson et al. 2018). To support such analysis, data collected on seed system development need to be sex-disaggregated, focusing not only on a gender comparison based on the sex of heads of household, but also on the majority of men and women who live in households headed by men.Opportunities exist for collecting gender-disaggregated data at scale. The Access to Seeds Index, a Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) benchmark published by the World Benchmarking Alliance, evaluates and compares private seed companies according to their efforts to improve access to quality seeds for smallholder farmers. However, the index does not provide gender-disaggregated data, nor does it include some crops that may be important for women, such as vegetatively propagated crops or varieties important for nutrition and livestock. If such data were added, the index could help inform national governments and development actors in designing gender-responsive seed policies.It is important to ask what seed systems can do for women, not just what women can do for seed systems. How should the formal seed sector reinvent itself to be more relevant to women seed users inpreferences and needs; designing effective information delivery channels; and enhancing the capacity of women to use the seed and benefit from it? How can seeds be made more affordable to smallholders, especially women farmers? What innovations and incentives can best support women seed entrepreneurs and producers, including gender-responsive financial products, capacity development, and policies?There are other opportunities to integrate gender into global seed system development frameworks and initiatives. However, the gender transformational potential of seed systems remains under-researched. ","tokenCount":"2200"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1126298012.json b/data/part_2/1126298012.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f5a8388f74f1022e7d67f0f9e59b5570eae1e530 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1126298012.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"8991f2c90dd676c963a3acb0b3623e73","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/781ccfae-00c7-4cc8-a135-da79d74a843d/content","id":"670744389"},"keywords":["Chilo partellus","quality insects","insect rearing","maize genotypes"],"sieverID":"3af63ffb-5405-4ce4-bcee-0cea6578dc0f","pagecount":"5","content":"The quality of laboratory reared stem borer species for screening of maize varieties is usually questioned by end user cereal breeders. A quality check study was performed in a screen house at KARI-Katumani to evaluate the quality of eight-year old laboratory reared stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe). The evaluation was aimed at finding out the performance of the laboratory borers subjected to six-month interval of gene infusion in comparison with wild F1 generation of the same species collected from the field. One hundred (100) maize seedlings were grown on plastic pots of 5 by 5 cm and of 12 cm-height. The maize seedlings were infested with five first instar larvae on eight plants replicated four times for each borer ecotype. The wild ecotypes were collected from two different localities for comparison with eight-year old laboratory reared borers. Foliar damage, tunnel length on the maize stems and the recovered number of C. partellus larvae from the maize plants were used as the parameters for quality measure of the borer ecotypes. The laboratory-reared stem borer species had been subjected to frequent six-month gene-infusion interval from the wild. The results indicated feedvoracity drop of 3.8 and 21.5% for stem and foliar damage on the laboratory borer ecotype. The study established the need for continuous gene infusion to maintain high quality maize stem borer species as test organisms.The spotted stem borer Chilo partellus Swinhoe (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) and the African stem borer Busseola fusca Fuller (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) are the most important lepidopteran stem borer species causing substantial annual loss of maize (Zea mays L.) production estimated at 13.5%, and worth US $91 millions in Kenya (DeGroote, 2002). Hassan (1998) had given an estimate of 0.4 million tons of potential yield in the country. Grain maize is one of the most important food staples in sub-Saharan Africa, providing food and income to well over 300 million resource-poor smallholders (FAO, 2008). Its cultivation spans the entire continent and it is the dominant cereal food crop in many countries, accounting for 56% of total harvested area of annual food crops and 30 to 70% of total caloric consumption (FAO, 2008;World Bank, 2011). Among pests, stem borers play a considerable role in reducing maize yield in Africa through damaging the leaves, stem, ears and kernels. Various control mechanisms have been evaluated including chemical, cultural, host plant resistance, and classi-cal biological control in different parts of Africa (Akinsola, 1990;Reddy, 1998;Kfir, 2002;Tefera et al., 2011). With the introduction of the parasitoid Cotesia flavipes Cameron (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) into Africa, notable achievements were reported in suppressing C. partellus and B. fusca (Kfir, 2002). Various insecticides have been recommended in order to protect plants against the stem borers. However, in addition to posing health problems, insecticides are frequently unavailable or too expensive for subsistence farmers in Africa (Mugo et al., 2008). Therefore, an environmentally safe and economically feasible stem borer control practice needs to be available.Host plant resistance is the most promising method to control stem borers, as it is environmentally benign, practically applicable and easy to adopt and to use by resource poor farmers in Africa (Mugo et al., 2008). Host plant resistance can be attained by using conventional breeding, marker assisted selection or by transformation (Reddy, 1998;Mugo et al., 2008;Tefera et al., 2010Tefera et al., , 2011)). In an effort to design effective and efficient methods to control the maize pests, the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), developed and deployed resistant, high yielding, and adapted maize hybrids and open-pollinated varieties through conventional breeding. In collaboration with CIMMYT-Kenya, KARI has released 12 stem borer resistant open pollinated maize varieties and hybrids between 2006 and 2011 (CIMMYT, unpublished data). The resistant varieties show low stem borer damage, whereas, insect-cide use is justifiable to susceptible lines when borer density reaches the economic injury level of over 10% (Kfir, 2002). Unlike other pest infestations, stem borer damage on maize might look small on the foliage part of the plant but the major injury is usually on the stem as reported by Hassan (1998). The CIMMYT and KARI collaboration on maize breeding for resistance relies on mass supply of stem borers with acceptable quality from KARI-Katumani Insectary, for field testing of improved maize lines and hybrids. At the KARI-Katumani insectary, stem borer larvae and pupae are periodically collected from infested field maize stubbles and stalks (Tefera et al., 2010).Observations at the KARI-Katumani laboratory indicated that the C. partellus species undergo about 11 to 12 generations in a year. The field collected insects are reared in isolation to F1 generation to avoid any contamination. Parasitized, diseased and deformed insects are discarded. The second generation is allowed to crossbreed with the laboratory colony to avoid genetic decay (Tefera et al., 2011). Despite periodic gene infusion done by mating the laboratory colony and the wild population, it has been observed that there is irregular infestation to maize plants when infested with laboratory reared neonates of C. partellus under field conditions. The objective of this study, therefore, was to assess the efficiency of C. partellus borers' subjected to continuous laboratory rearing in comparison to field collected populations.An eight-year old laboratory-culture of C. partellus with six-month periodic gene infusion was compared with field collected populations of the same species from two different agro-ecological zones, Low/Medium 4 (LM4) at Kima and Upper Medium 3 (UM3) at Masii of the lower eastern Kenya. The two sites at Kima and Masii are different in altitude and thus the stem borer ecotypes were presumed to be different on voracity feeding on maize stems. C. partellus larvae were collected from 10 fields in each locality. Stem borer ecotypes at Kima were collected from farms of geographic areas of 01° 56.614 S, 037° 18.118 E and 01° 50.5 545 S, 037° 19.780 E sites in July 2011. Mean locality altitude was 1327 m above sea level. The farms within Masii locality were in 01° 28.992 S, 037° 23.394 E and 01° 32.183 S, 037° 17.368 E, with mean altitude of 1433 m above sea level. The mean altitude difference between the Masii and Kima sites was about 100 m.The collected larvae were reared on artificial diet after removal from the plant stems for one month (August/November, 2011) before using them on potted maize plants to evaluate their quality. One hundred (100) seedlings of maize variety, Katumani Composite B (KCB) were grown on plastic pots of (5 cm-lenght × 5 cm-width × 12 cm-height) on well watered loam soil in September 2011. The plants were placed in a screen house (3 × 5 m), where day time temperatures ranging between 18 to 34°C and relative humidity between 36 to 78% (day and night). The plants were arranged in three groups, each group consisting of 24 plants. The plants were infested separately with three stem borer ecotypes (laboratory, Masii and Kima) with five first instar larvae per plant three weeks after emergence (late September and another lot November, 2011). The treatments were arranged in completely randomized design with four replicates. The plants were monitored daily and watering was done when required.Two months after infestation, foliar damage, tunnel length, number of surviving larvae and plant height were recorded after splitting the stems using a knife. Foliar damage was scored using a 1 to 9 scale (where 1 = least, 9 = highest) (Tefera et al., 2011). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for plant height and tunneling lengths was performed using one-way (ANOVA) for each parameter across the three borer ecotypes. Non-parametric analysis of variance (Kruskal-Wallis) was used to determine foliar damage and number of borers. Plant percentage damage of leaf (out of total) and tunnel length (of total stem length) was calculated for borer ecotypes. T-test on significance difference of damage of pooled wild (Masii and Kima) and laboratory borers were explored to comparably measure the difference between the two ecotypes. GenStat Discovery 3 edition software was used for the significance difference test and Ms Excel for graphing of the percentage damage of leaf and stem.The foliar damage was significantly different (P<0.05) among the C. partellus ecotypes as well as number of live borers recovered on maize samples was significantly different (P<0.001) (Table 1).Maize plants infested with the different ecotypes of C. partellus had fairly similar heights (Table 2). The tunnel length was significantly different (P<0.001) among the three different site sources. The Kima ecotype caused the highest stem damage followed by Masii and the laboratory borers 45.03, 18.05 and 9.93 cm, respectively as shown in Table 2.There was higher number of Masii and Kima borer ecotypes (3.1 and 4.0) leading to subsequent higher tunnel lengths of 45.0 and 18.1 cm, respectively (Table 3). The laboratory culture borers (1.9/tem) had the least tunnel length of 9.9 cm/plant stem. This indicates that higher borer numbers led to increased tunnel length.The foliar damage index was a mean of 2.5 for the labo-ratory and 4.5, indicating 28.5 and 50% plant damage for the laboratory and wild borers, respectively (Figure 1). The stem damage percentage was 19.5% for the eightyear old Katumani laboratory borers compared to the 23.3% of the wild collected borers as shown in Figure 1. This was a mean short fall of 3.8% for the tunnel length and 21.5% level for the foliar damage, of laboratory borers as compared to voracity of wild borers. A t-test analysis of foliar and stem damage (tunneling) indicated a significant difference (<0.001) between the two C. partellus borer samples tested on KCB maize (Table 4). This was demonstrated by 8.62 of foliar damage and 12 value of t-statistic (df = 7) of stem damage between the laboratory-reared and field (wild) collected C. partellus borers.Some workers on mass rearing of cereal stem borers have reported on the need to observe quality insect products by regular gene infusion of the laboratory cultured insects with the wild ecotypes which have diversified gene pool (Owens, 1984;Onyango and Ochieng-Odero, 1994). From the study, the Masii C. partellus ecotypes had twice stem damage (tunneling) in comparison to the laboratory reared borers. Both foliar and stem damage levels of wild ecotypes were higher indicating a slow deteriorating quality of the laboratory reared C. partellus. The wild borer numbers on test maize stems was higher than the eight-year laboratory reared ones.The study results show that the quality of the laboratory C. partellus borers had lower voracity of feeding on the maize plants. Though, minimal difference on stem damage from the wild borer ecotypes; it nevertheless demonstrated that in time laboratory, reared borers on artificial diet need frequent gene infusion to maintain their efficient quality as test organisms (Owens, 1984). The type of borer change which had occurred to C. partellus, whether physiological or morphological could not be ascertained from the study. If the artificial diet caused the low voracity of feeding of the borers on the maize plant whorls or the motility of the larvae on plants need to be answered in a similar study (Berger, 1993) and probably by including molecular studies. Artificial diet formulated and prepared in the laboratory enable mass production of cereal stem borers like C. partellus (Tefera et al., 2011). Kega et al. (2011) reviewed the advantage of rearing stem borers on artificial diet leading to high numbers of eggs and larvae available for use by scientists and students involved in maize lines evaluation against specific stem borer pests. A year ago, the cost of producing one Chilo pupa was reported as KES 6.50 and Busseola sp as KES 13 (Kega et al., 2011). Nevertheless, the need to develop stem borer resistant maize varieties overrides the cost involved. Over decade ago, DeGroote (2002) estimated the yield loss in Kenya at US $ 76 million ha -1 . In the survey study, the marginal areas of Kenya led in maize deficit of the country's 0.39 million tones per year with stem borers contributing 15 to 21% loss (DeGroote, 2002). This emphasizes the likelihood of more laboratory produced stem borers for more research work towards developing stem borer resistant maize lines suitable to the varied agro-ecological zones of Kenya, and the larger south and eastern Africa region. Field experimental settings could reflect lower damage scores due to other biotic factors like increased predation on the borers by biological agents agents in the environment (Bonhof et al., 1997). Early surveys in Ethiopia on cereal stems borers indicated that infestation levels depended on presence of natural enemies in the field (Gebre-Amlak, 1985). Reddy and Walker (1990) on a review of Chilo species damage of field cereals observed that this borer led other species in frequency in the South and Eastern African region. C. partellus has been reported to significantly reduce KCB variety yield under artificial infestation but escape such damage in natural settings where it matures early unlike late maturing varieties where higher damage occurs not only on the stem but also on the cobs (Kumar and Saxena, 1994).It is important to continue with regular yearly gene infusion activities on laboratory reared C. partellus probably by reducing the interval from six to three months to continue providing quality insects to scientists carrying out maize screening tests both for the conventional and genetically modified varieties to enhance economic maize production (van de Berg et al., 1997;Tefera et al., 2011). The end user of the particular borer species needs to be assured of the quality of the test product, neonates, eggs or adult stages intended for maize genotype screening.","tokenCount":"2225"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1132691069.json b/data/part_2/1132691069.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a83f5fd346976595f3803e7521d850bd08ea89d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1132691069.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"005c80df33c008014e41436dc929409c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/d7659515-5ed7-40d7-ba6d-813701919aad/retrieve","id":"-1292217683"},"keywords":["Conserved ortholog set (COS)","Genetic mapping","Potato genome","Solanum"],"sieverID":"21eb120c-2f6e-4bf9-a09e-663c72086326","pagecount":"12","content":"Background: Conserved ortholog set (COS) markers are an important functional genomics resource that has greatly improved orthology detection in Asterid species. A comprehensive list of these markers is available at Sol Genomics Network (http://solgenomics.net/) and many of these have been placed on the genetic maps of a number of solanaceous species. Results: We amplified over 300 COS markers from eight potato accessions involving two diploid landraces of Solanum tuberosum Andigenum group (formerly classified as S. goniocalyx, S. phureja), and a dihaploid clone derived from a modern tetraploid cultivar of S. tuberosum and the wild species S. berthaultii, S. chomatophilum, and S. paucissectum. By BLASTn (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool of the NCBI, National Center for Biotechnology Information) algorithm we mapped the DNA sequences of these markers into the potato genome sequence. Additionally, we mapped a subset of these markers genetically in potato and present a comparison between the physical and genetic locations of these markers in potato and in comparison with the genetic location in tomato. We found that most of the COS markers are single-copy in the reference genome of potato and that the genetic location in tomato and physical location in potato sequence are mostly in agreement. However, we did find some COS markers that are present in multiple copies and those that map in unexpected locations. Sequence comparisons between species show that some of these markers may be paralogs. Conclusions: The sequence-based physical map becomes helpful in identification of markers for traits of interest thereby reducing the number of markers to be tested for applications like marker assisted selection, diversity, and phylogenetic studies.The use of genetic diversity in plant breeding is a sustainable method to conserve valuable genetic resources and to increase agricultural productivity and food security [1]. To facilitate the use of the wide genetic diversity existing in landraces and crop wild relatives more information is needed on the organization and structure of their genes and genomes. Molecular markers linked to loci with important effects hold a promise to facilitate the introgression of those traits into adapted germplasm. Agriculturally important traits captured during domestication are often coded by very limited number of loci with major phenotypic effects. Within the Solanaceae it is common to find that these loci have putative orthologous counterparts in other species [2] and therefore molecular markers, such as Conserved Orthologous Set (COS) markers, are powerful in comparing genomic information across species [3].The development of markers for orthologous genes, many of which have been mapped in tomato, is documented in the Sol Genomics Network [4]. Comparative mapping studies with the help of COS markers have shown syntenic relationships within various species of the Solanaceae family [5][6][7] and between species within the Asterid and Rosid clades comparing coffee (Rubiaceae, Asterid) with tomato (Solanaceae, Asterid) [8] and coffee and grapevine (Vitaceae, Rosid) [9]. The combined power of comparative mapping and systematic analysis of germplasm with orthologous gene markers can efficiently leverage information generated by genomic research from one species to another. COS markers also have shown great power in resolving interrelationships of tomato and potato with great precision [10].The recent accumulation of nucleotide sequences of model organisms and crop plants has provided fundamental information for the design of sequence-based research applications in functional genomics [11]. The draft genome sequence of potato has been publicly available since late 2010 and the finalized high-quality sequence has been released [12] as well as the genome sequence of closely related tomato [13]. The availability of these genomes and the genomic tool kits, such as genome browsers, are of great importance to the scientific community working with solanaceous crops. With the help of physical sequences, new molecular markers can be developed efficiently, utilizing genes in the regions of the genome that contain markers linked to traits of interest. The possibility of comparing physical and genetic maps also has implications for molecular breeding programs, facilitating the search of molecular markers flanking QTL [14]. Linking COS markers to the potato genome sequence allows for powerful comparative genomics between the potato genome and other species with COS-based maps that do not yet have genome sequence available.Here we present a case study where COS are amplified from diverse set of Solanum germplasm and aligned to the whole genome sequence of potato, allowing for comparison of physical and genetic maps of related species. We aligned the sequences of COS, generated from a panel of ten genotypes of potato and tomato, to the recently published potato genome sequence and compared the physical location with the genetic location in tomato and potato. We show that the COS markers analyzed are single-or low-copy in the DM potato genome (see Methods) and that there are several breaks in colinearity between the species analyzed.In total, 322 COS were mapped in silico in the potato genome, from here on referred to as DM, utilizing the DM superscaffold sequences (Additional file 1: Table S1). To verify that the hits located inside predicted genes, we ran BLASTn against the DM gene sequences and found that ten COS had no matching DM gene although they had high confidence hits in the superscaffold sequence; we did not pursue these markers further. The COS markers are distributed throughout the genome (Additional file 1: Table S1) and the majority exist as single copy markers. However, 17 markers are present in multiple copies (Table 1) with either existing in tandem repeats in the same genome region or having copies in different genomic regions. After single copy, the most frequent copy number is two and the highest copy number is three.For genetic mapping in potato we utilized mostly the back cross progeny BCT [15]. 186 COS markers were placed on the BCT consensus linkage map, which contains in total 321 markers assembled into 12 linkage groups. The total length of the consensus BCT map was 1042 cM, the average marker interval was 3.4 cM and the maximum interval was 34.7 cM on chromosome 12. In addition three COS markers were integrated on the BCT paternal map because they would not integrate on the consensus map.19 markers that were not polymorphic in the BCT parents, were placed on the previously published frame work genetic maps of PCC1 [16] and PD [17]. The genetic maps are shown in Additional file 2: Table S2.A total of 208 COS were placed on the potato genetic maps (Additional file 1: Table S1). Of these, 173 were also mapped in silico, but there are 35 markers that were only mapped genetically because their DNA sequences were not available. The Tomato EXPEN2000 genetic map, from here on referred to as TomEXPEN, was used as a reference and the map locations of the COS markers in silico mapped in potato in this project were downloaded from the SGN web site [4]. Of the 322 COS mapped in silico 254 were found in the TomEXPEN map.Based on the previous information on their location in the TomEXPEN map, most of the COS markers mapped into the expected potato chromosomes either in the reference potato genome, (DM) or in the potato genetic maps BCT, PCC1 or PD (BP) (see Methods; Figure 1). Of the 173 shared markers between DM and the potato genetic maps, eight map in different chromosomes and 12 have one copy mapping on the same chromosomes and a second copy in another one (Additional file 1: Table S1). Of the 254 markers shared by DM and TomEXPEN, ten are in different chromosomes and nine have one copy mapping in the same chromosomes and a second copy in another chromosome. Of the 305 markers that had a single location in DM, in total 15 mapped in unexpected chromosomes when compared to tomato or potato genetic maps (Table 2). These markers had a single matching DM gene hit except for two markers which had no gene hit. The difference may be a real one suggesting major differences in genome organization but it may also reflect errors in sequence assembly or genetic mapping.Markers having unexpected locations were found in all chromosomes, but the highest number of these was in chromosome 10. Pairwise comparisons between the three maps show that eight markers that locate in chromosome 10 in at least one of the maps have an alternative locus in another chromosome (Additional file 1: Table S1). These markers are: C2_At2g46370, (in silico 1 and 5, tomato 10); C2_At3g60080 (in silico 2, tomato 10); T1391 (in silico 2, potato 1 and 10, tomato 10); T0966 (in silico 10, potato 10, tomato 7); C2_At5g08580 (in silico 10, potato 2, tomato 2); C2_At5g06760 (in silico 10, tomato 1); C2_At4g26180 (in silico 12, potato 10, tomato 12); C2_At2g41680 (in silico 4 and 10, in tomato 9). Differences are mostly specific to the genetic maps, meaning that the marker position is usually conserved in two of the maps. Also, multi-copy markers mapping to different chromosomes in silico in DM are mostly found in one of the same chromosomes in the genetic maps. For example, This could be simply because the alternative marker was not detected due to lack of polymorphism or because the other sequence detected by BLASTn search is a paralog.The COS that mapped in the same chromosomes by both methods (in silico in potato and genetically in potato or in tomato) as found at SGN were not always in agreement in their exact order, reflecting errors either in statistical testing or differences between the solanaceous species at the microsynteny level. In addition to the nine large inversions between tomato and potato several small inversions have been demonstrated [13]. In total, 77 COS that were mapped in potato (either in silico or genetically) were not found on the TomEXPEN map and thus we were not able to compare their locations.We observed 17 markers that were duplicated in the potato genome. To find the DM genes that correspond to these markers we ran a BLASTn search against the Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium (PGSC) databases containing the genes and the coding sequences. For most of the markers (in total 13) all copies had the same annotation suggesting that they could be orthologs (Table 1). The four markers that have different annotations for the copies are T0408, At1g14980, At2g42620 and T1511. To further test the ortholog/paralog relationship of these markers we aligned the potato and tomato reference genome gene sequences, coding sequences and query sequences for these markers and constructed Neighbor Joining trees (Figure 2).T0408 marker was sequenced from two genotypes, the parents of the PD population (CHS_625 and PS-3). This marker is entirely in the exon region and is similar to the genes PGSC0003DMG400046906 (gene of unknown function) on chromosome 1 and PGSC0003DMG400029022 (aminotransferase) in chromosome 11 (Table 1). In the TomEXPEN map this marker is found in chromosome 1. The coding sequences PGSC0003DMC400069010 and PGSC0003DMC400050560 are identical in the query sequence region consisting of 119 amino acids. However, outside this area the two DM CDS are not identical. Genotype CHS-625 differs from the DM sequences in only one amino acid. Genotype PS-3 is highly heterozygous and because only one sample was sequenced and we cannot resolve the two possible haplotypes of this genotype and therefore it appears different from the rest of the sequences (Figure 2a). The corresponding tomato reference genome coding sequence is quite different from the potato sequences. In this case the gene may be single copy but the marker may be unspecific, resulting in alternative hits. Marker At1g14980 was amplified from genotypes LA1974, HH1-9 and M200-30 and the sequences are similar to PGSC0003DMG400028744 (PGS0003DMC40005 0071) in chromosome 7 and PGSC0003DMG402023448 (PGSC0003DMC400040570) in chromosome 5 with the e values of 1.00E-110 and 1.00E-99, respectively. The marker spans both exonic and intronic regions. Translated amino acid sequences of the exonic regions show two well resolved groups where two sequences from M200-30 group together with one of the tomato genomic sequences and two sequences from HH1-9 group with the CDS of the gene that maps in chromosome 5. Relationships with the other DM coding sequence are not well resolved (Figure 2b). Genetic mapping in potato suggests that the marker resides in chromosome 5. However, based on the sequence data we cannot determine the correct location for this marker. Marker At2g42620 sequences from the BCT population parents (HH1-9 and M200-30) have hits in genes PGSC0003DMG400007856 (F-box family protein) and PGSC0003DMG400035320 (F-box/leucine rich repeat protein) with the e values of 0 and 1.00E-112, respectively. The first gene is found in chromosome 12 and the latter in chromosome 7. According to the NJ tree, all our sequences from the genotypes HH1-9 and M200-30 are more similar to the first mentioned gene represented by the coding sequence PGSC0003DMC400013844 (Figure 2c). The latter DM gene has some amino acid changes comparing with the others and thus may code for a different gene as already shown by the different annotations (Table 1). Genetically this marker is found in chromosome 12 in tomato which most likely is its correct location.Marker T1511 was amplified from five genotypes (CHS-625, PS-3, PI310991, MP1-8, and HH1-9). According to the BLASTn analysis it is similar to the DM genes PGSC0003DMG400018190 (Elongation factor TuA) in chromosome 3 (1E-160) and PGSC0003DMG400041767 Elongation factor TuB, 6E-63) in chromosome 6. In NJ tree all genotypes are more closely related to the first gene represented by the CDS PGSC0003DMC400031700 (Figure 2d). The marker resides in the exon and has quite variable sequence even at the amino acid level. Because this marker has been genetically mapped in chromosome 3 in tomato and the evalue for the hit in chromosome 3 is higher (Table 1), this is most likely its correct location. Of the three corresponding tomato coding sequences, two group with the chromosome 3 gene.A comparative summary of the maps is shown in Figure 1. Overall the alignment of COSII markers follows a sequential order. However, as described above several COSII markers show differences as indicated by crossing lines or lines indicating locations on different linkage groups or pseudomolecules.There is a large overlap of QTL regions between the traits included and based on this information alone the same markers may be considered candidates for disease resistance and Carotenoid or vitamin C biosynthesis (Additional file 1: Table S1 and Additional file 3: Table S3). Therefore, functional annotations of the matching DM genes (Additional file 3: Table S3) may help suggesting markers in candidate genes for the QTL traits and for further studies.The SEA analysis showed that the COSII-DM list contained no associated ontology terms that were significantly different in the biological process gene ontology category as compared to the list of terms associated with the original COSII list. However, both the COSII-DM and the original COSII term list have associated term lists that are enriched for 33 GO terms in the biological process category that is different (see Table 3 and Additional file 4: Figure S1). The terms form two major groups: a) cellular metabolic process and b) response to stimulus.COSII markers represent an important functional genomics resource that has greatly improved comparative mapping in Asterid species. They can be used to design primer sequences for cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) useful for genetic mapping across diverse taxa, including the Solanaceae. In genetic mapping, the number of markers placed on the map is dependent on the number of polymorphisms between the parents of the cross. Our initial goal, before the availability of the genome sequence, was to facilitate comparative mapping in the Solanaceae by mapping 300 single-copy COSII in potato, Solanum tuberosum, to a diploid mapping population. However, limitations mostly in the level of polymorphism resulted in the successful genetic mapping of only 208 markers using three different segregating populations. The availability of the potato genome sequence enabled another approach to be taken to investigate the genomic locations of these markers in potato. With the help of BLAST analysis we successfully mapped over 300 orthologous markers in silico and compared their physical location in the reference potato genome to that of the genetic location in a potato cross and in previously published map of tomato. Because we utilized DNA sequences obtained from various Solanum species we were able to sample some of the polymorphism present in these taxa and thereby detect markers that are potentially present in multiple copies. We found that most of the markers are present as single-copy in the reference genome. Low copy number is a required character for markers intended for comparative genetic mapping and phylogenetic analysis. Low-copy sequences generally evolve independently of paralogous sequences and tend to be stable in position and copy number. However, a potential problem is the existence of gene families producing paralogs that can evolve independently [18] and the fact that some genes characterized as low-copy in some groups can be multiple copy in others. We discovered that very low number of the COS markers tested here (17 out of 354, 4.7%) were designed on genes that were present in multiple copies in potato, thus validating the low-copy number definition of these markers.In silico mapping using the BLASTn algorithm seems to work well in mapping COS marker sequences into the reference genome. This is because the COS primers have been designed to amplify a PCR fragment in the size range that is suitable for BLAST and they have been tested through rigorous algorithms to target genes that are present in single or low-copy numbers [19]. The BLAST algorithm may result in the identification of paralogous sequences. This is a problem only in the case of incomplete reference sequence dataset or when the target genes belong to gene families. Since our input database is the complete genome sequence of potato and most of the markers resulted in a single hit in the genome it is likely that the genes identified are true orthologs. However, for the sequences resulting in multiple hits, it is necessary to make gene-level comparisons when attempting to distinguish paralogues from orthologs. For the markers that target intronic regions, this may be difficult.The ontology enrichment analysis showed that no bias was introduced in the COSII-DM list as compared to the original COSII list. In general, both gene lists may have a slight overrepresentation of genes in cellular metabolic process and response to environmental stress, and be related to QTLs and agronomic traits of interest like yield, quality and resistance. Considering COS markers that locate in previously published QTL as candidate genes for a given trait may be difficult because the QTL regions span large parts of the chromosome. However, functional annotations are helpful in narrowing down to some specific candidate genes. Some obviously interesting candidate markers for late blight resistance are C2_At5g51840 (Rar1) and C2_At4g36530 (Cinnamoyl-CoA reductase) in chromosome 11 as well as C2_At4g02600 (MLO1) in chromosome 9. RAR1 is required for the functionality of several R genes [20], while Cinnamoyl-CoA reductase is the first enzyme on the pathway leading to production of Lignin, which is an important factor in plant defense responses and MLO1 confers broad spectrum mildew resistance in barley [21].Obvious candidate markers for carotenoid and vitamin C biosynthesis are not that easy to identify from this study. However, the QTL regions for these traits contain a couple of photosynthesis and chloroplast related genes, which is to be expected since carotenoids function in photosynthesis acting as pigments in the light harvesting complexes and vitamin C is just a few biochemical steps away from 'sugar' produced by photosynthesis. Carotenoids have two key functions in plants: broaden the light spectrum for light harvesting and protecting the chlorophyll against oxidative damage or excess energy [22]. Overlapping regions for QTL for vitamin C biosynthesis and disease resistance are not surprising since many biological processes are altered in the plant during defense response. For example ascorbic acid content in leaves has been shown to modulate plant defense transcripts [23] and has been suggested to protect the cells against oxidative stress arising from wounding [24]. We found only a few COS markers that mapped in unexpected chromosomes. In cases where one copy was detected in the same chromosome as in the genetic map and an additional copy in an alternative locus, it is possible that one of the markers detected originates from a paralog. Often these can be readily detected by choosing the gene hit with the best e-value. The single copy markers that have unexpected locations between physical and genetic maps may be true differences as we are comparing different species (DM = phureja, BCT = berthaultii × tuberosum, PCC1 = paucissectum × chomatophilum, PD = phureja × tuberosum, and finally tomato). Tomato and potato are generally considered to be highly colinear in their gene order [13,25,26], and this is true for the majority of the RFLP markers shared by the tomato and potato maps at the SGN website [4]. According to Tanksley et al., [26] tomato and potato genomes differ by only five paracentric inversions while these two species differ from pepper and eggplant by many more complex rearrangements, mainly paracentric inversions and translocations [27,28]. According to the most recent tomato/potato comparison there are nine major inversions and several small ones [13]. Significant conservation is found between distantly related species from the Asterid (Coffea canephora and Solanum sp.) and Rosid (Vitis vinifera) clades, at the genome macrostructure and microstructure levels [9]. A minimum of three (and up to ten) inversions and 11 reciprocal translocations differentiate the tomato genome from that of the last common ancestor of Nicotiana tomentosiformis and N. acuminata [6].It is possible that the potato reference sequence may contain small numbers of incorrectly oriented or misplaced scaffolds as well as genes that were not discovered by the gene prediction algorithm used. As seen in this work we found a number of markers that had a high confidence hit in the whole genome sequence, but no gene hit. We ran those genome regions through Softberry gene prediction and were able to identify genes matching the COS marker hit region (results not shown). Further work focusing on the genome regions that from this work show contradictory results may facilitate the refinement of the genome assembly and annotation.The high degree of conservation of gene order (synteny) in the Solanaceae revealed by cross mapping of homologous gene sequences has provided insights into genome evolution and has enabled the cloning of genes for agronomically important traits [29,30]. However, when comparing two genetic maps it is necessary to take into account that the number of markers shared by any two maps is rather small, and therefore allows only a limited resolution for comparison. Recent comparisons of physical maps between solanaceous species have allowed for more detailed level of comparison of gene order and orientation [31,32]. Comparison of orthologous regions shows general colinearity between solanaceous species, but also local breaks due to inversions and/or indels. Also, some of the inconsistencies in sequential ordering may well be artifacts since both the potato and the tomato genome still contain scaffolds that could not be oriented. Our results may help to refine the assembly and annotation of the potato and tomato genome.The distances between markers on a genetic linkage map are based on the proportion of recombination events occurring within a given chromosome segment and thus indicative of gene order at a much lower resolution than physical map distances, which are the actual nucleotide sequence based distances. The sequencebased physical map becomes helpful in identification of markers near traits of interest and thereby reducing the number of markers to be tested in developing applications such as marker assisted selection, diversity assessment, and phylogeny.The COS markers studied are mostly present as single copies in the reference potato genome sequence, making them ideal for applications such as diversity and phylogenetic studies. In silico mapping is complementary to genetic mapping and facilitates detailed marker identification for traits of interest.Parents of the BCT [15], PCC1 [16], PD [17], the DM/ DI//DI (developed at CIP and contributed to the Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium for anchoring of the DM potato genome [33], and tomato mapping populations [34] were subjected to COS marker amplification intended for DNA sequencing. The progeny from BCT backcross population (M200-30 (USW2230 × PI473331) × HH1-9) involving Solanum berthaultii and S. tuberosum [15], PCC1 [16] and PD [17] were used for genetic mapping. In addition, COS were amplified from other asterid species Ipomoea trifida genotypes M9 (CIP107665.9) and M19 (CIP 107665. 19), and Daucus carota genotypes QAL and 0493B [35] for cross species comparisons. Leaf tissue was ground in liquid nitrogen and genomic DNA was extracted using standard protocol [36].COS markers were selected comparing the published genetic maps with the tomato COS map [4] and selecting markers that located in the QTL intervals for late blight resistance and/or maturity [16,17,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], ascorbic acid biosynthesis [45] and carotenoid biosynthesis [46] (Additional file 1: Table S1). In addition markers with annotations to genes known to have function in abiotic and biotic stress were selected.COS markers were amplified from genomic DNA and the optimal annealing temperature for each primer pair was determined using temperature gradient. PCR reactions were conducted with 25 ng of DNA in a 1× PCR buffer (10 mM tris HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.1% Triton-X), 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 0.2 mM of each primer forward and reverse and 0.5 U of Taq polymerase. Reactions were set up in microplates and processed in an MJ Research model PTC-200 PCR thermocycler with the following cycles: 1 cycle at 94°C for 4 min, 35 cycles at 94°C for 1 min plus 55 or 60°C for 1 min plus 72°C for 1 min, and 1 cycle at 72°C for 5 min. The bands were separated by SSCP (singlestranded conformation polymorphism) electrophoresis using 6% denatured (7M urea) polyacrylamide (19:1) and visualized by silver staining. All well-separated bands were cut from the gels with a razor blade. The excised gel slices were placed on 96-well PCR plates, and the DNA was eluted in 40 uL of sterile nuclease free water. This was used as a template in a new PCR reaction with the same primers in a 10 uL reaction.One μL of this product was sequenced with the same primers in a 5 μL reaction using the ABI Big Dye dideoxynucelotide termination kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California). Amplifications were carried out in an MJ Research DNA Engine Dyad® Peltier Thermal Cycler (Watertown, Massachusetts) using an initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of 96°C for 25 s, 50°C for 20 s, 60°C for 5 min and with a final elongation at 72°C for 7 min. Excess of dye terminators were removed using CleanSeq magnetic bead sequencing reaction clean up kit from Agencourt Biosciences (Beverly, MA). Sequences were resolved on an ABI 3730xl capillary-based automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems) with 50 cm POP-7 polymer capillaries at the Biotechnology Center of the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Alternatively, for some of the markers the PCR products were isolated and purified with Qiaquick Gel Extraction kit and sequenced without the previous reamplification step.Publicly available sequence files and other data of potato S. tuberosum Group Phureja DM1-3 516R44 (CIP801092) generated by the Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium were obtained from [47]. We used the v3 superscaffold sequences, v2.1.10 AGP Pseudomolecule Sequences, 3 DM Pseudomolecule AGP data (v2.1.10), v3.4 gene sequences, and v3.4 cds. Tomato genome sequences were obtained from [48]. We used the ITAG1 release cds and genomic sequences.We used VectorNTI to assemble the COS marker DNA sequences and queried the consensus sequences of contigs formed by at least two sequences against the DM superscaffolds using BLASTn. The DNA sequences of the COS markers were deposited to the NCBI GenBank GSS database and SGN database (Table 4). The exact location of each COS in the DM genome was obtained by selecting the best matching hit location based on e-value. The positions of the COS in the DM physical map were determined with the help of the superscaffold location information in pseudomolecules according to the pseudomolecule report v.2.1.9 provided by PGSC.Three diploid mapping populations BCT [15], PCC1 [16] and PD [17] were used for segregation analysis to locate COS in potato linkage groups. Polymorphisms were detected by high resolution melting (HRM), [49], SSCP followed by silver staining or by agarose gel electrophoresis. For HRM the PCR amplification was performed with the fluorescent DNA-binding dye (LCGreen) and the DNA melting profiles were analyzed by LightScanner instrument (Idaho Technologies). Melting curves were analyzed with the help of the LighScanner software and converted into appropriate segregation codes. For the gel separated markers, polymorphic marker alleles were recorded considering presence and absence.The band and HRM records were compiled according to the genotype codes of population type CP described in the Joinmap® 4 manual [50]. A consensus map was constructed with Kosambi's mapping function following Joinmap® 4 manual [50].A comparative COSII map between the integrated potato genetic map, the potato physical map and the tomato genetic map was made as described in the legend to Figure 1. The figure was prepared using the genoPlotR library [51] for the statistical software R [52].We ran a BLASTn against the DM genes and coding sequences provided by PGSC and the tomato genomic and coding sequences using our marker DNA sequences as queries. The marker sequences and the corresponding gene or coding sequences were aligned as DNA or translated amino acid sequences depending on whether the marker sequence obtained was covering intron or exon regions of the genes analyzed. The alignments were made using ClustalW and Neighbor Joining (NJ) trees were constructed using the Poisson correction method for amino acid sequences and the Maximum Composite Likelihood method for DNA sequences. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA5 [53].In the initial phase of the project the list of ontology terms associated with the 2868 COSII markers was manually reviewed and filtered for genes with gene ontology annotations that may have a role in traits of interest like stress tolerance and late blight resistance. For the final analysis, other criteria included single-copy status, and mapped in DM/DI//DI. This final list of 273 markers (further referred to as COSII-DM list) was subjected to the 'Singular Enrichment Analysis' tool as available on the AgriGO web-site [54]. The method tests if particular terms are over-represented or different in the set of interest against a reference list. We tested if the COSII-DM list was different from the original COSII list and versus the Arabidopsis gene model (TAIR9) as available on the AgriGO web-site. The focus of interest for the term analysis was on GO terms within the 'biological process' category.earlier versions of the manuscript. LP: Selected markers on QTL intervals, conducted genetic mapping in potato and amplification of COS for all species, compiled sequence data. FR: Selected markers for analysis, coordinated generation of sequences from amplification products, helped write paper. RS: Supported selection of COS and analysed ontology. LM: Obtained funding, helped write paper, submitted sequences. DS: Obtained funding, helped write paper. MB: Obtained funding, helped write paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.","tokenCount":"5141"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1137244443.json b/data/part_2/1137244443.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..75d46f2bb4e6b7754875230a456b490a06f274f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1137244443.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"c30b52a949df9486c1fd120dfc45c5fd","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/c6ef044b-6e73-4f27-94a2-5ce6058158ea/retrieve","id":"1344625693"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b694129b-09bc-44e0-864c-6759a7eeb46f","pagecount":"3","content":"A CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF) project, led by the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), has worked in these upper catchments of northern Laos, finding ways to enhance the food and livelihood security of some of the poorest farmers in the region. For local farmers like Sysomphane, upland rice farming had become unproductive. They could only produce a six months supply of rice each year, and needed to buy the rest from the trader who made regular trips to the village. Her fellow villagers, who had smaller rice fields in the valley, took to terracing the slopes, but some of these were also unproductive because of soil erosion. The CPWF research team discussed with villagers the reasons for low farm productivity, such as the short fallow period, intensified cultivation, soil erosion, water losses, and the decline of forest cover in the watershed. The researchers initially planned to limit themselves to testing and validating a few technologies. However, because of strong community and institutional participation in the project, the scope of their engagement was expanded. For Sysomphane it was important that the project help farmers like them to produce more to meet their additional needs, reducing the number of hungry months in Ban Fai.The project team inventoried, characterized and mapped land and water resources in the upper catchments.Water-poverty links were studied using household survey data. ","tokenCount":"227"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1166938966.json b/data/part_2/1166938966.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fb49234f1c0787dc2f3361550a2ae10a944ea697 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1166938966.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ed9273440174b9f02965906bf18a727e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/852b071c-598f-4b39-80e7-9ad52b90eb72/content","id":"-2075962057"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"91fd46a2-813b-4952-ab05-f68a3140f8a7","pagecount":"1","content":"Ni Ugonjwa wa mahindi unaosababishwa na virusi. Ugonjwa huu husababishwa na muunganiko wa virusi vya aina mbili: Virusi vya Mabaka na Madoa ya Mahindi-Maize Chlorotic Mottle Virus (MCMV) na mojawapo kati ya virusi vifuatavyo: Virusi vya Batobato ya Miwa-Sugarcane Mosaic Virus (SCMV), Virusi Vidumaza vya Batobato ya Mahindi-Maize Dwarf Mosaic Virus (MDMV) na Virusi Michirizi vya Batobato ya Ngano-Wheat Streak Mosaic Virus (WSMV)Hatua 12 za kuzingatia ili kupata mbegu bora ya mahindi isiyokuwa na Ugonjwa wa Mnyauko (Maize Lethal Necrosis-MLN) 1 Pata historia ya shamba pamoja na ugonjwa katika shamba la kuzalishia mbegu kabla ya kupanda 2 Hakikisha udongo una rutuba ya kutosha ili kuweza kupata mimea iliyo bora. Inashauriwa kupima rutuba ya udongo kila baada ya kipindi kisichozidi miaka mitatu ili kuweza kutambua aina ya mbolea itakayotumika Chunguza dalili za ugonjwa shambani, ng'oa, choma au fukia mimea yote itakayoonekana kuwa na dalili za ugonjwa nje ya shamba.Chukua sampuli za mimea itakayohisiwa kuwa na virusi, chunguza sampuli hizo kwenye baabara (au kwa kutumia kifaa maalum) ili kuthibitisha kama mimea hiyo ina ugonjwa. • Madoadoa machache au mengi kwenye jani ambayo huanzia chini ya shina la jani changa na kusambaa kuelekea kwenye ncha yake.• Majani machanga hukauka kabla ya mmea kuchanua, hali hiyo husababisha dalili inayoitwa 'kifo cha moyo', hatimaye kifo cha mmea mzima.• Jani hukauka kuanzia kwenye kingo zake na kusambaa kuelekea katikati, hatimaye jani lote.• Mmea hudumaa na kukomaa kabla ya wakati wake.• Wakati mwingine mmea huwa tasa (hakuna utengenezaji wa chamvua).• Gunzi huwa na mbegu chache kabisa.• Maganda ya mhindi hukauka kabla hayajakomaa wakati sehemu zingine za mmea zikiwa bado ni mbichi (zikiwa na rangi ya kijani).• Gunzi huoza• Mashambulizi ya kuvu wenye rangi ya kijivu kwenye magunzi yaliyooza hujitokeza kama maambukizi nyemeleziUgonjwa wa Mnyauko huenezwa kwa njia zifuatazo:• Wadudu wa aina mbalimbali, wakiwemo: Vidukari na Vithiripi-hula kwa kufyonza utomvu wa mahindi; minyoo ya mizizi; panzi na mbawa kavu-hushambulia majani.• Wanyama wa aina mbalimbali, binadamu pamoja na zana za kilimo-katika kuzihamisha kutoka shamba moja hadi jingine (kunaweza kukawa na shamba lenye ugonjwa) ","tokenCount":"334"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1177748276.json b/data/part_2/1177748276.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b52e7a0ca66ff7d098b33eedc601066396145c62 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1177748276.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"40399d59158920ed2ec4ce55ee7b7337","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/15efe123-0efb-40be-addc-8b931a369041/retrieve","id":"972352246"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"ff733bf9-d1db-4537-8ef1-311d2978ffdb","pagecount":"8","content":"Estimados lectores de nuestro boletín: Esta quinta edición aparece con un pequeño atraso debido a la actividad intensa en los últimos dos trimestres.La evaluación de medio periodo fue planificada para octubre pasado pero fue postergada a enero 2006. Por eso tuvimos que adaptar nuestras actividades a este cambio. Esta edición es corta con un artículo en el centro de nuestro socio SIDE, reflejando el desarrollo y los cambios en los precios del ganado en Costa Rica.Costa Rica tiene una gran cantidad de subastas de ganado en todo el país. Esas subastas han contribuido mucho a la transparencia de precios. Las diferentes subastas son manejadas por organizaciones de productores y empresarios privados. Para muchas cámaras de ganaderos una subasta bien manejada es casí como una mina de oro que les permite generar ingresos y ofrecer una variedad de servicios para sus socios. SIDE organizó para representantes de productores y empresarios privados de los otros paises de Centro América una serie de capacitaciones en aspectos de subastas con visitas y con intercambios directos con los representantes de las cámaras que manejan subastas.Un aspirante fuerte para establecer una subasta es Honduras con su Fondo Ganadero como entidad de gestión para una subasta. El Fondo Ganadero de Honduras está interesado en establecer la primera subasta de Honduras en Choluteca para el año 2006.La publicación de esta quinta edición coincide con el fin del año y las fiestas navideñas. Tomamos la oportunidad para agradecer a nuestros socios la colaboración y el apoyo que hemos experimentado y les deseamos una Feliz Navidad y un próspero y exitoso Año Nuevo.El proyecto organizó una pequeña fiesta navideña con los socios en Nicaragua el día 21 de diciembre que fue muy divertida con comida típica y rica. Por supuesto con carne de primera calidad, baile y karaoke hasta media noche. (4) noticiaS Paula Cordero de SIDE salió del proyecto a fines de agosto para estudiar en EE.UU., en la universidad estatal de Ohio para obtener un doctorado en economía. Nosotros le deseamos mucha suerte. La nueva cara en SIDE es Melissa Ugalde. Melissa es también economista y reemplazó a Paula a partir de septiembre pasado. En Honduras la secretaría de la cadena de carne esta manejada por Juan Carlos Ordoñez, quién fue el coordinador de las actividades en Honduras. El proyecto le desea mucho éxito en sus esfuerzos y le va apoyar lo más posible. El sector privado en Honduras fundó CAFOGA (Cámara de Fomento de la Ganadería). La idea es establecer una entidad similar a CORFOGA de Costa Rica, pero manejada solo por el sector privado. Los ingresos de la organización vendrian de un autogravamen sobre el ganado sacrificado. Esto requiere una ley que está en preparación. Según un artículo de \"La Prensa\" (edición de diciembre 19) en Nicaragua la gandería es la campeona de las exportaciones (carne vacuna y ganado en pie) en el año 2005. Una gran demanda de la exportación resultó de México. Debido a los casos de la \"vaca loca\" en Estados Unidos, México cerró su frontera para importaciones del norte y empezó a comprar en Centro América. Esto causó una alza de precios para ganado y para carne bovina.(5) loS prEcioS dEl Ganado En coSta rica: la suerte de tenerlosSe expresa un agradecimiento especial a la Sra. Carmen María Dengo, Gerente de la empresa GANAFAX S.AEn muchos paises los ganaderos sufren las consecuencias de no estar informados sobre los precios del ganado. Como resultado de ello, cuando tienen que vender sus animales, en la finca o en una feria local, no tienen un punto de referencia para negociar. El resultado es que reciben por sus animales menores precios que los que merecen o por lo menos que sean precios que reflejan condiciones de mercado competitivo.Desde hace varios años en Costa Rica se establecieron las subastas de ganado, como una instancia que permite una relación directa entre compradores y vendedores. Actualmente existen 15 subastas, unas de propiedad privada y otras de propiedad de cámaras de ganaderos. Dado que algunas subastas realizan eventos dos veces por semana, en total se realizan 22 subastas por semana.Un evento de subasta dura más o menos 4 a 5 horas, pasando los animales de uno en uno y muy ocasionalmente, en grupos pequeños cuando los animales son homogéneos y del mismo propietario. La afluencia de ganado en cada evento de subasta fluctúa entre 300 y 700 animales, y a veces más. Por lo tanto se estima que cada semana se subastan alrededor de diez mil animales.En Costa Rica subastas se han convertido en el mecanismo de formación de precios para el ganado. A partir de un precio de referencia, por kilo en pie, presentado por el Subastador (en base a una larga experiencia), los interesados en comprar \"pujan\" el precio hasta que queda el mejor postor. En esta forma se determinan los precios para animales de diferente edad, sexo, calidad y estado físico. Las subastas reportan doce categorías de animales.Algunas subastas hacen entrega de la información semanal de precios a la empresa GANAFAX. GANAFAX a su vez los resume y entrega semanalmente a personas, empresas y cámaras suscritas a su boletín semanal. Esta labor de GANAFAX es de extraordinario valor, como se demuestra en el análisis que se presenta a continuación.A partir de los datos ofrecidos por GANAFAX, SIDE ha construido un archivo de información de precios semanales para cinco años. A continuación se presenta un análisis que utiliza parte de esta información, para ilustrar las diferencias de precios del ganado según la ubicación de las subastas, el sexo y edad de los animales, y la calidad de los mismos. A continuación se ofrece un breve comentario de referencia sobre cada uno de estos criterios. Las zonas de producción. Aunque Costa Rica es un país pequeño (51,000 kilómetros cuadrados) muestra importantes diferencias en condiciones ecológicas entre la región de Pacifico y la zona Atlántica. Mientras en la primera predomina el ganado de tipo cebuino, especialmente en el Pacifico Seco (Guanacaste); en la zona Atlántica Central (San Carlos) se destacan importantes lecherías con ganado Holstein, y también cruces de ganado cebuino con razas europeas. Por otro lado en las zonas del Pacifico es mas notoria la estacionalidad en cuanto a precipitación. Por lo tanto, al compararse los precios entre zonas, hay diferencias en los precios por kilo en pie para el mismo tipo de animales y puede haber diferencias en los precios en diferentes épocas del año.Con el propósito de relevar la importancia de la cercanía a los mataderos, ubicados en el Valle Central (en las inmediaciones de San José), se incluyen también los precios del ganado en la subasta de Santa Ana y en la plaza de Montecillos. En este último caso solo se ofrecen los precios de los animales destinados a la matanza, toros o vacas.En realidad esta diferenciación se refiere dos aspectos, por un lado el sexo y por otro la edad. En cuanto al sexo, para hembras se reportan los precios para vacas lecheras (de desecho) novillas y terneras. Y en el caso de machos se reportan los precios para bueyes (de desecho), novillos, repasto (machos para desarrollo y engorde) y terneros. Las diferencias son muy marcadas entre todas estas categorías, y ello depende en gran medida por razones de la expectativa de vida de los animales o su destino inmediato y su aporte de carne en canal. Al respecto puede esperarse precios mucho mas altos para las terneras, luego las novillas y finalmente las vacas lecheras de desecho. Algo similar se aprecia en el caso de los machos.Este es uno de los aspectos mas importantes a destacar en cuanto a la información de precios. Es bien conocido que para animales de la misma edad, de la misma raza, machos o hembras, hay diferencias importantes en la calidad de los animales. Esto es mas notorio en los terneros y terneras, pues el precio es un reflejo de su potencial reproductor o como potencial productor de carne. la tendencia general de los precios del ganado.Sobre este tema es común la apreciación de que la ganadería de carne es cada vez menos rentable, debido a los malos precios del ganado. Desde luego que en muchos paises y quizás ese es el caso de Costa Rica, la disminución en la Rentabilidad se debe mas a al alza en los costos de producción. La situación ha sido particularmente seria en los últimos años a raíz del aumento en los precios del petróleo.Este breve artículo pone en evidencia la gran importancia de contar con las subastas como un mecanismo de formación de precios para el ganado y también la importancia de que estos sean conocidos por los ganaderos. En tal sentido las Cámaras de ganaderos deben cumplir una labor de difusión de estos precios.Además de reportar los precios, es también de alto valor el análisis que se hace de los mismos. Lo aquí mostrado es solo una pequeña porción de lo que puede ser un análisis mas exhaustivo. Ello es una invitación a profesionales y estudiantes vinculados a la ganadería para que realicen un análisis mas detallado al respecto.","tokenCount":"1508"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1183973917.json b/data/part_2/1183973917.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..81bbed6ddeda0c5301b6a3d59448d0e2ed2403df --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1183973917.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3f36b3efdba0d0c538ff91ec03fccbad","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/99b61632-d8e8-4f0a-af28-9abc9ec1207c/retrieve","id":"1033884649"},"keywords":["Simulation model coupling","Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT)","wheat blast disease (Magnaporthe oryzae pathotype Triticum (MoT))","wheat (Triticum aestivum)","climate information services","disease inflicted relative yield loss"],"sieverID":"57d0851d-6365-4ceb-aafa-ce2013b05174","pagecount":"109","content":"* The period of the mini-grant project finished in 2019, but the project still continues and will generate some outcomes during 2020By the end of 2019, due to funds availability, one extra project was awarded with the Crop Modeling CoP mini-grant program for starting in 2020 (Table 2, see Section 4 for more information), adding a total of 7 mini-granted projects.There is a significant opportunity-and need-to improve the global coordination of crop modeling efforts in agricultural research, which in turn will greatly improve our ability to develop crops and cropping systems to be more resilient in the face of climate change, underpinning food security at its roots.The Community of Practice on Crop Modeling was created to initiate a better-coordinated and more standardized approach to crop modeling challenges. By promoting FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data principles, the Crop Modeling CoP fosters a culture that values GEMS (Genotype x Environment x Crop Management x Socio-Economic) data and facilitates its members to solve global grand challenges faster, better and at greater scale.In order to enhance the collaboration among crop improvement experts, the Community of Practice on Crop Modeling started a mini-grant program in 2017 to provide CoP members from CGIAR and external partners with mini-grants (10K-20K) to facilitate the development of key activities, tools, datasets, and model analysis that can facilitate CGIAR's crop modeling research, achieve some boost/impact within the community, and promote collaborations.The Crop Modeling CoP mini-grant program has so far awarded more than US$110,000 in grants to a total of 6 mini-projects (Table 1). The outcomes from the funded projects have been and will be shared among the CoP via publications, webinars, and news feeds. During 2019 five mini-granted projects have been developing their activities, generating valuable outcomes for the crop modeling community that will be here presented (sections 2 and 3).During 2019, five awarded projects carried out their activities and generated different outcomes of interest for the Crop Modeling community. In Table 3 we can find a summary of each of the projects and their main outcomes. In this section, some of the main outcomes generated during 2019 are highlighted.• News containing the project outcomes published in the Crop Modeling CoP website: o Xiong, Wei, Senthold Asseng, Gerrit Hoogenboom, Ixchel Hernandez-Ochoa, Richard Robertson, Kai Sonder, Diego Pequeno, Matthew Reynolds, and Bruno Gerard. 2019.Warming Impacts on Wheat.\" Nature Food, 1-7. WorldClim2 provides gridded climate data by month for the period 1970-2000 for several variables (max and min temp, average temp, precipitation, solar radiation, wind speed and water vapor pressure) at four resolutions (10, 5 and 2.5 minutes and 30 seconds). The objectives of this projects are:1) Increase the functionality of WorldClim2 by developing grid files that include variables by location;(2) Reformat WorldClim data into a format that is of direct use to crop and other modelers; -Global climate datasets at the same four resolutions as WorldClim2, organized as direct-access binary files with crop-modelrelated variables stored in each record by location.-Updated MarkSimGCM software, both the web-based and the stand-alone versions, that utilises WorldClim2.-Blog Post in the Crop Modeling website (Published 2020) Develop an early warning system (EWS) for wheat blast outbreaks applicable to Bangladesh, Brazil, and beyond using linked crop and disease models and numerical weather forecasting. This project will increase flowering predictability by integrating the Decision Support System for Technology Transfer (DSSAT) model to the wheat blast EWS framework for Bangladesh and Brazil, thereby allowing improved risk assessments. The activities will result in both decision support tools and advisories to assist in rational and integrated disease management in South Asia.-Integration of crop models into Wheat Blast Early Warning System (EWS) for Bangladesh: http://34. Develop necessary tools to accelerate production of post-rainy (rabi) sorghum yields in India. This will involve using APSIM_sorghum as a decision support tool to design suitable crop and management interventions for particular locations and to optimize rabi sorghum systems productivity. The validated modelling set-up from prior work is being used and being spatially refined to suit this particular purpose. Such improved set-up will be further used to design the site-specific optimal genotype x management (G×M) options, which have higher probability to increase productivity in specific regions of rabi-sorghum production tract in India.-Use of modeling for testing different G x M options in all the grids of rabi sorghum regions in India. The results can be visualized using an interactive map application: https://maps.csita.cz/.Better Clean and curate the large IWIN data sets (from 1986 until 2018) and to fill gaps, such as anthesis date, daily temperature, and other missing parameters, which will be modeled, to have a complete and rich dataset ready to be used for the crop modeling community and other research activities. This project will also use machine learning algorithms in order to establish a connection between phenotypes, genomic data and performance of CIMMYT's nursery lines at a global scale.IWIN data sets will be made publically available via the GARDIAN portal. Hourly weather data for the key IWIN data sites (max 500) will also be made publicly available.-Curation of the elite spring wheat yield trial (ESWYT), international durum wheat nursery trial (IDYN) and high temperature wheat yield trial data (HTWYT).-Started a collaboration with www.meteoblue.com weather company to receive the daily (and 3 hourly) weather data from 1985 at 30 Km resolution -Develop of a flag system to mark questionable records and development of an algorithm to estimate the missing phenology data.In the following section, we will present the final report presented for each of the grantees describing the activities performed, the results and main outputs generated during 2019.Peter Jones, Waen Associates Ltd., UK.Agricultural modelling of crops, livestock and households is widely carried out in CGIAR, for a wide variety of purposes, including evaluating different options in time and space in a way that can add massive value to the field-based activities that CGAIR centres undertake.WorldClim v1 has been used very widely in CGIAR's (and other organisations') modelling efforts, as has MarkSim, software that basically allows the user to move from climate data for any location to weather data for the same location that are characteristic of the particular climate, including future climates as generated by successive generations of IPCC climate modelling activities. Now that WorldClim has been updated with new data, this is an excellent time to update the various MarkSimGCM tools that can be used by the general user, and to provide a set of climate grids that can be used directly by modellers who do their own programming. The proposal will build on the recently-released version 2 of WorldClim, which updates the previous version of the dataset and corrects several errors.WorldClim2 provides gridded climate data by month for the period 1970-2000 for several variables (max and min temp, average temp, precipitation, solar radiation, wind speed and water vapor pressure) at four resolutions (10, 5 and 2.5 minutes and 30 seconds). This project will (1) Increase the functionality of WorldClim2 by developing grid files that include variables by location, as well as providing the basis for deriving a key variable not currently included, number of rain days per month;(2) For one kind of user, reformat WorldClim data into a format that is of direct use to crop and other modellers; (3) For users who do not do their own programming, upgrade MarkSimGCM to work from the WorldClim2 data set, providing weather files that can be used directly in crop modelling software such as DSSAT and APSIM. The project started in July 2018 and due to some technical problems was extended until February 2019.This work has updated the MarkSim application data with the new data from WorldClim v2.0, Fick & Hijmans (2017). The outputs are a new set of MetGrid files at 10, 5 and 2.5 arc minutes and 30 arc seconds, and sets of CLI files, which can be used as input to the standalone version of MarkSim or as input to other weather generators. Until now, MetGrid files have not been available to the general user; this changes with this version and they are available for download from CCAFS at CIAT. As they are a highly specialized format, a Fortran module, MetGrid_Handler, has been produced for general distribution to assist their use. The full final report or the project can be found in below (Annex 1).During March 2019, the compressed CLI files and the panes descriptor were installed and made available from a world map interface at CIAT under: http://www.ccafsclimate.org/pattern_scaling/Colombia: project report Julian Ramirez-Villegas 1,2 ; Jeison Mesa 1 ; Patricia Alvarez 1 ; Chetan Deva 3 ; Andrew J.Challinor 2,3 Beans are the most important grain legume for direct consumption across the globe. The common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is the most important bean species in terms of consumption, and is grown under a wide range conditions, and therefore exposed to a number of production constraints, including drought, heat, and various pests and diseases.Here, we have conducted an analysis of stress patterns based on crop simulations for dry bean aiming at determining whether the set of selection sites and conditions adequately represents the intensity and timing of the stresses that exist across the target production environments. The results indicate that, if bean production is to continue and expand in Colombia, a breeding strategy that explicitly accounts for the separate and joint occurrence of high temperature and drought stress is required. We highlight the fact that nearly half of the analyzed sites, years and seasons experience significant heat stress, and all sites experience some type of drought stress. While the bean program has historically been centered on drought, and as a result has phenotyping facilities that allow for selection of drought-tolerant genotypes, selecting for heat stress tolerance required the definition of a new site with the adequate temperature conditions. As a result of this and related work, a new site, Espinal (Colombia), has been selected for heat phenotyping and selection under high-temperature conditions. In order to implement a breeding strategy that is truly global, future work will require expanding the current understanding of stress response in African environments and develop a range of tools (e.g. molecular markers, phenotypic screens) that contribute to accelerate the breeding process.Domesticated in the Americas, beans are the most important grain legume for direct consumption across the globe (Beebe, 2012;Beebe et al., 2011). The common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is the most important bean species in terms of consumption, and is grown under a wide range of climates, soils, cultivars and technological levels (Allen et al., 1989;Broughton et al., 2003). Due to the large variation in growing conditions, beans are exposed to a number of production constraints, including drought, heat, and various pests and diseases (Frahm et al., 2004;Seidel et al., 2016;Suárez Salazar et al., 2018). Additionally, bean farmers usually lack the institutional support, knowledge, and access to technologies and services that are necessary to respond to such constrains (Perez et al., 2019;Thornton et al., 2010). In addition, climate change will exacerbate many of these constraints, reducing productivity and or making bean cultivation no longer suitable in particular areas (Eitzinger et al., 2017;Rippke et al., 2016;Taba-Morales et al., 2020). In Colombia, the fifth most important bean consumer in Latin America, and the focus of this study, bean farmers are highly vulnerable to climate variability and climate change (Perez et al., 2019;Ramirez-Villegas et al., 2012).Under this context, bean breeding at the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) has focused on developing high-yielding, stress-adapted genotypes that meet farmer and consumer needs, and also have enhanced nutritional attributes. For instance, CIAT's partners have released more than 550 bean genotypes in 19 countries in sub-Saharan Africa.Nevertheless, while the bean breeding has been delivering benefits to farmers on a global scale, a key question remains as to whether the current breeding strategy needs to be adjusted in light of existing and future projected biotic and abiotic stresses. Most importantly, a key question for crop improvement is whether the set of selection sites and conditions adequately represents the intensity and timing of the stresses that exist across the target production environments. Here, we seek to resolve this question for Colombia by conducting a model-based analysis of Target Population of Environments.We applied a characterization of environments that uses a process-based crop model, and integrates weather, soil, crop and management factors to generate a comprehensive understanding of the stress patterns that are most relevant. We first calibrated and evaluated the crop model using existing field trial data for two representative cultivars (one commercial, one promising drought and heat-tolerant line). Next, we conducted spatially explicit crop model simulations using weather data from on-the-ground weather stations and other publicly available data sources. We then analyzed the crop model output to determine stress patterns through clustering. Finally, we discussed our findings with the crop improvement team to start devising an improved breeding strategy.The research conducted under this project was enabled by a series of existing and new ii)A greenhouse experiment at the University of Lancaster, which helped determine breakpoints of vapor pressure deficit (VPD) at which plant transpiration starts reducing, as well as the slopes of the response curve between transpiration and VPD before and after the breakpoint. Because the experiment included 12 genotypes of varied genetic backgrounds, it also provided useful insight as to genotypic differences in VPD response.iii) Finally, an experiment at CIAT (in Cali, Colombia) helped identify a clear interaction between heat tolerance and VPD (vapor pressure deficit) response.Data analysis from this experiment helped identify an empirical model that can predict leaf temperature using air temperature and relative humidity (Deva et al., 2020).While results from these three experiments are being incorporated by the University of Leeds in an improved bean model, the research presented in this document used primarily the Santander trial data. Using these data, we calibrated and evaluated the CSM-CROPGRO-DRYBEAN model. Analyses focused on two varieties included in the trial, a representative commercial check (Calima) and a promising line for drought and heat stress for Colombia (SAB686). These two varieties were deemed representative enough of commercial and breeding genotypes and will hence be used for all analyses. The field experiment included seven treatments (i.e. seven different planting dates), out of which two were used for model calibration, and the remaining four were used for model evaluation.Model calibration was performed through the following steps:i) Identify key parameters that needed calibration through sensitivity analysis. To this aim, we conducted a Sobol (Saltelli et al., 2007;Sobol' et al., 2007) ii) Calibration of model parameters through a genetic algorithm with calibration data (2 treatments). Using observed dates of flowering, pod and seed appearance and physiological maturity, we first calibrated phenology parameters. Next, we calibrated growth parameters using total, leaf, stem, and pod biomass, yield, and leaf area index. For phenology, for which all variables are in the same units (i.e.days), we sought to minimize the sum of squared errors (SSE), whereas for growth, we used the distance correlation normalized by the mean absolute error. Figure 1 shows phenology calibration and evaluation results for both SAB686 and Calima.In general, the simulation of phenology was found to be accurate for both calibration and evaluation experiments, with RMSE being the smallest for SAB686 (RMSE=2.47 days, RMSE relative to mean = 4.8 %), and about twice as large for Calima (4.95 days, 9.8 %). Notably, RMSE for both reduces in the evaluation experiments (except for CM14), suggesting the model represents well the phenology of these genotypes. We also note that CM14 calibration performed better than the calibration reported here in both calibration and evaluation experiments. Simulated yield is presented in Fig. 2 for the calibration experiments. For these experiments, in general, the performance of the model for simulating growth (not shown) and yield of SAB686 was better than for Calima. For Calima, specifically, we note that CM14 calibration performed poorly compared to the calibration reported here. There were also differences in how well the model simulated both treatments across the two genotypes. Treatment 1 was systematically well simulated for both genotypes, whereas treatment 2 was generally underestimated by the model, especially for Calima.Simulated yield for evaluation experiments is shown in Fig. 3. We find consistent model performance across the three genotypes, with the model generally performing well for treatment 3 and 5, and relatively poorly in treatment 4. It is possible that the model is overestimating the degree of drought stress in treatment 4 for the three genotypes, or that there is associated experimental error in the field measurements, especially for genotype Calima, for which variation across replicates is larger. It is also Calima. However, despite these limitations, the model performs sufficiently well for phenology, growth and yield, especially for genotype SAB686.possible that the weather measurements or the initial field conditions are not captured well. As for calibration experiments, the performance of the model for SAB686 was greater compared with that of Calima. Finally, we note that the CM14 growth parameter set tends to perform less well than our calibration.These results suggest that there are inherent limitations in the model that require more careful examination and improvement, especially under stress situations and for genotype. Model parameters are shown in Table 1 for the two genotypes. As a reference, we include parameters from CM14, which are generally consistent with the calibration results from the genetic algorithm. Once the model was calibrated and evaluated, we used it to perform the TPE analysis. The analysis followed a well-established methodology, previously applied to common beans in Brazil (Heinemann et al., 2016). Daily precipitation data for a total of 426 locations across Colombia was gathered from the IDEAM (Colombian Meteorological Service). These data were quality-controlled, and gap-filled as necessary. Temperature and solar radiation data were gathered from the NASA Prediction of Worldwide Energy Resources (POWER)database. The final database contained data for all locations for the period 1984-2008. Crop model simulations were conducted for both cultivars, grown in rainfed conditions, and using agronomic recommended management for the region (seed depth, planting density).Simulations were performed across 8 representative planting dates chosen to capture historical variation in the start of the rains at each of the 426 locations. Since our analysis focused on both temperature and drought stress responses, all simulations were conducted without nitrogen stress. Using the daily crop model output, we then computed the average drought stress (ratio of actual to potential evapotranspiration) and heat stress (average minimum temperature)indices every 100 degree-days (using a base temperature of 5 ºC). At an average temperature of 20 ºC, these correspond to 5 calendar days. We chose to aggregate per degree days because the significant temperature variations across bean growing areas of Colombia (Ramirez-Villegas et al., 2012) create substantial disparity in the duration of the growing cycle, which precludes an analysis based on calendar days. These data were averaged from the day of emergence until physiological maturity, as simulated by the crop model. Using these data, we then performed a k-means clustering with 3 and 4 centers for each index individually (water stress, heat stress), and chose one (3 or 4 groups) as the final result after visual inspection.The analyses indicated that minimum temperatures explain most of the yield variation in Colombia. This is because of the spatial variation in minimum temperatures across Colombia, and the relatively large number of locations analyzed (n=426). Figure 4 shows the identified heat stress profiles, derived from clustering the 100-degree-day averaged minimum temperature data. After careful examination, three temperature stress patterns were identified, resulting primarily from differences in the within-season mean minimum temperature. These lead to different yield outcomes. The warmest environments (following stress pattern \"S1\"), experience an average minimum temperature of 25 ºC, which results in shorter cycles and a significant reduction in grain filling rates as a result of heat stress. Previous research in experimental settings has shown substantial yield reductions when night temperatures (herein ascribed by minimum temperatures) exceed 23 ºC (Gross and Kigel, 1994;Ofir et al., 1993;Vara Prasad et al., 2002).The two other environments experience much colder temperatures, with \"S2\" showing temperatures in the range of 16-17 ºC, and pattern \"S3\" showing temperatures around 14 ºC. These stress profiles correspond to the Andean hillsides, where night temperatures hardly exceed 20ºC. While we find that temperature is the primary driver of crop productivity across Colombia, there is also substantial variation in drought stress (Figure 5). All of the stress profiles identified here show some degree of drought stress, which indicates that Colombian bean production is challenged by both heat stress and drought. The most severe is also the most likely (\"S2 -severe reproductive and terminal drought stress\", 39% probability of occurrence). This stress pattern shows a relatively early onset of drought (around 400 degree-days), and no recovery. attern \"S1\" (severe terminal drought stress, 34.4% probability of occurrence) shows the same severity although with a later onset. Pattern \"S3\" (severe reproductive stress, 15.7% probability of occurrence) shows severe drought stress during flowering (around 600 degree-days), but the stress is later released. Finally, stress pattern \"S4\" shows only moderate stress around flowering (moderate reproductive stress, 500-600 degree-days). We also find a significant interaction with temperature. More specifically the \"S4\" pattern is associated with the shortest crop durations, likely resulting from warmer temperatures.Conversely, pattern \"S2\" generally experiences longer crop durations, likely associated with cooler temperatures.Climate change is expected to increase temperatures and alter precipitation amounts and distributions in Colombia and elsewhere (Ramirez-Villegas et al., 2012;Rojas et al., 2019). It is therefore clear that bean breeding will continue to be challenged by both high temperatures and limited water availability. Bean breeding will require a strategy that addresses these two challenges, while also targeting nutritional outcomes for a rapidly growing human population.The bean program at the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) uses conventional and novel breeding approaches to develop beans that have greater yield, are drought tolerant, and harbor adequate market and nutritional attributes for vulnerable populations in both Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa (Beebe, 2012;Beebe et al., 2011).More recently, the program has also been developing heat-tolerant genotypes, making use of inter-specific crosses (CGIAR, 2015). While the program is not Colombia-specific, there are many promising breeding lines which have potential for climate adaptation, greater productivity, and enhanced iron concentrations for Colombia. Some of these are being released by HarvestPlus 2 . Here, we find that roughly 50 % of the bean production areas analyzed experience severe heat stress during the cropping cycle, whereas all areas2 See here http://lac.harvestplus.org/frijol-biofortificado-bio-101-bio-107/ experience some type of drought stress, with particular severity during the reproductive and grain filling stages.To provide a more comprehensive picture in order to set bean breeding targets, a preliminary version of TPEs was also created for East Africa, under the \"AcceleratedVarietal Improvement and Seed Delivery of Legumes and Cereals in Africa\" (AVISA)project (Figure 6). These TPEs used a simpler method based only on the clustering of monthly temperature and precipitation data. A total of five environmental groups have been defined, with the aim of facilitating site selection and understanding likely stresses, including pest and disease pressure. We highlight the existence of a hot environment (cluster \"5\", in blue in Fig. 6), where temperatures are similar to those of heat stress profile \"S1\" in Colombia (see Fig. 4). The breeding program will thus have to adjust to take explicit account of the stresses occurring in both Latin American (with focus on Colombia here) and African environments.The combination of these analyses further advances the discussion within the bean program (including modelers, breeders and eco-physiologists) regarding, (i)The design of an appropriate set of experiments that help gain physiological understanding of heat stress; and(ii) Design a testing trial network for advanced testing by CIAT partners in Africa and Colombia.Currently, drought phenotyping is carried out with the help of a rain shelter, as well as offseason in Cali (Colombia) and elsewhere (e.g. testing sites in Fig. 6). While these will need to be adjusted to a certain extent based on the results of shown in Fig. 5, heat phenotyping is less straightforward. A site for heat phenotyping needs to be identified that adequately represents the stress patterns identified. Toward this aim, CIAT scientists (breeders, modelers and eco-physiologists) went through a site selection exercise based on the TPE results, and additional analysis of climatic data (Figure 7). Results indicate that a large proportion (~70%) of the areas under bean cultivation will eventually have temperatures that are as warm as Espinal (Figure 8). Hence, the selection of Espinal as a heat phenotyping site is highly beneficial for the development of climate-ready common beans. We have conducted an analysis of stress patterns based on crop simulations for dry bean.The results indicate that, if bean production is to continue and expand in Colombia, a breeding strategy that explicitly accounts for high temperature and drought stress is required. While the bean program has historically been centered on drought, and as a result has phenotyping facilities that allow for selection of drought-tolerant genotypes, selecting for heat stress tolerance required the definition of a new site with the adequate temperature conditions. The selected site in Colombia will help breeders and physiologists develop knowledge and tools to accelerate the breeding of heat-tolerant genotypes. In order to implement a breeding strategy that is truly global, future work will require expanding the current understanding of stress response in African environments and develop a range of tools (e.g. molecular markers, phenotypic screens) that contribute to accelerate the breeding process.Broughton, W.J., Hernández, G., Blair, M., Beebe, S., Gepts, P., Vanderleyden, J., 2003 between the models also demonstrated the capability to link two models to predict disease occurrence and when applied to a hind-cast experiment driven by historically observed weather data inputs, could quantify wheat blast induced relatively yield losses in the 2015-16 epidemic season in Bangladesh. This same linkage structure can also potentially be applied to couple DSSAT models to other disease models, and should be the subject of additional research.Magnaporthe oryzae pathotype Triticum (MoT), or wheat blast disease, was first discovered in Brazil's Parana state in 1985 (Igarashi et al., 1986). While the disease attacks all above ground plant parts, fungal infection of wheat spikes by MoT can cause significant yield losses (Cruz and Valent, 2017). While spike infection by MoT resembles Fusarium head blight, the two diseases can be differentiated because MoT infects the rachis, above which spikes appear white with partially or completely unfilled grain. With more advanced infection, the entire spike appears to be sprinkled with black fungal spots visible to the naked eye. Although infection can occur at the vegetative stage, yield losses are most severe when infections occur during flowering and/or early grain formation stages (Cruz and Valent, 2017).Following the initial appearance of wheat blast in six municipalities in Brazil in the eighties, the disease gradually spread to Bolivia, Paraguay and parts of Argentina (Duveiller et al., 2016). As such, until 2016, wheat blast was largely considered as a problem for farmers in South America, although some research had been conducted on potential risk scenarios should introduction to North America take place (Cruz et al. 2012). For these reasons, it came as a great surprise when MoT was however found to have infected over 15,000 ha in the space of six weeks during the months of February through March in 2016 in Bangladesh (Malaker et al., 2016).At that time, wheat Bangladesh's second most widely grown cereal, preceded by rice and followed by maize (BBS, 2017). Large-scale infection sparked fears of potential spread across the region, with the Government of Bangladesh and neighboring areas in India encouraging farmers to grow alternative crops to reduce disease pressure (Mottaleb et al. 2019). Wheat blast reappeared in Bangladesh during the 2016/17, 2017/18, and 2018/19 wheat growing seasons, although at low levels of incidence and severity. Reports from the popular media also suggest that wheat blast had begun to spread into India (e.g. Das 2017). Although prevailing climatic conditions and a significant reduction in wheat areas in Bangladesh appears to have limited the cropped area with infection during seasons, the threat posed by wheat blast remains very real.Regional extrapolation estimates have suggested that South Asian farmers could lose up to 1.77 million tons year -1 with light infections of just 10% (Mottaleb et al., 2018).Wheat blast infections are affected by climatic conditions, the degree of susceptibility of host cultivars, and the location (leaf, stem or spike) and timing (vegetative or reproductive stage) of infection (Goulart et al., 2003). MoT tends to be associated with regions that have high humidity (Fernandes et al. 2017). Combined with temperature, relative humidity influences the speed of M. oryzae development (Calvero et al. 1996). Cardoso et al. (2008) suggested that the optimal temperatures for blast infection of wet or damp spikes range between 25 and 30 °C. Spore reported to confer 50-72% resistance to head blast in some genotypes under glasshouse conditions (Cruz et al. 2016). However, during a 2015 blast epidemic in Bolivia, even the best materials with resistance were insufficient for controlling blast (Vales et al. 2018). In Bangladesh, affordability. An alternative approach to mitigating the threat posed by wheat blast is to incorporate principles of integrated pest management (IPM), although most IPM programs require farmers to regularly visit and observe their fields to estimate infection levels. An alternative is the development of linked crop and disease development models that, when driven by weather forecasts, can assist in the early prediction of disease risks to alert farmers to take preventative action when and where it is needed. This report explores and reports research conducted over the last two years to address the this alternative by coupling a weather information driven wheat blast spore development and infection model (Fernandes et al., 2019) with the wheat crop development and a yield prediction model to assess the potential impact of wheat blast in a virtual simulation environment.The maximum yield of plants, determined by their genetic potential, is rarely achieved because factors such as lack of water or nutrients, adverse environmental conditions, insect damage and especially plant diseases will limit growth at some stage. Plants exposed to these biotic and abiotic drivers are said to be stressed. Crop pests and diseases are responsible for direct yield losses ranging between 20 and 40% of global agricultural productivity (Oerke 2006;Savary et al., 2012).However, crop losses remain poorly recognized as an important driver in matters of food security, whereas plant diseases have had an enormous impact on livelihoods throughout human history (Flood, 2010).Plant disease simulators have also been envisioned as a tool to support decision-making on the control of a particular disease, for example. A plant disease simulation model simulates the course of an epidemic based on amount of primary inoculum, weather and availability of susceptible host tissue (Magarey et al., 2004). Model outputs may assist in the choice of management practices, to maintain a low level of damage to a particular crop and to avoid major economic losses. forecasts. By doing so, the goal of their work was to increase the ease of use and applicability of this model in data limited environments. Both of these models however only predict disease incidence and severity; they are currently limited in that they do not assess potential crop losses to MoO or MoT, respectively.To be realistic plant disease simulation models should have a dynamic link with the crop model (Bregaglio et al. 2016). Despite efforts are few models which can run in real time, both the crop and the plant disease simulation model. This process is often laborious and requires knowledge of all models involved. To assess the potential impacts of pests and diseases on crop production, some crop models include coupling points, presented in simple graphical format in Figure 1.These can be which can be thought of as specific model variables whose changing values can be used to represent pest and disease damage to crop organs or growth processes. Plant disease simulators, on the other hand, are created to represent the impact on the final yield of a crop (Savary, et al., 2006 ). The coupling point concept was first introduced in 1983 (Boote et al. 1983), and later formally implemented in the DSSAT crop modeling platform (Jones, et al., 2003) as a Pest Module (Batchelor et al., 1993). A variety of methodologies exists for coupling environmental models (Brandmeyer et al. 2000) that can be extended to crop and disease models. Examples of coupling point variables include leaf mass or area, stem mass, root mass, root length, and seed mass or number, all of which might be negatively impacted by pests and diseases. By identifying specific mechanical and infection damage pathways, and rates of damage using these variables, growth models can be tuned to quantify how crop development and yield might be affected.Once implemented the new model can address multifaceted issues, such as on season risk analysis and studies on climate change/variability impact on crop growth and development (Bregaglio & Donatelli. 2015). The DSSAT Pest Module for example allows users to input field observations or dynamically modeled data on insect damage, disease severity, and physical damage to plants or plant components (e.g., grains or leaves). Users can then simulate the likely effects of those pests and diseases on crop growth and economic yield (Fernandes et al. 2019a).Among different approaches to integration of different simulation models the use of message passing interfacing (MPI) approaches is catching the attention (Pajankar & Pajankar. 2017).This report provides information on initial progress to dynamically simulate and couple both the MoT life cycle and wheat crop development by linking weather-data driven disease and crop models to estimate infection and spike damage. Although this project focuses on both Bangladesh and Brazil, this report provides details of initial model coupling and preliminary simulation efforts in Bangladesh only. All results presented in this report should therefore be treated as preliminary and non-definitive.An existing generic model constructed to simulate the interactions between diseases and wheat In Equation 1, T and RH refer to air temperature and relative humidity, respectively. Where RH is below the threshold in Equation 1, the model does not accumulate thermal time, and as such it does not simulate individual MoT spore development. Conversely, the model does calculate the development of a spore cloud and the density of spores in a 1 m3 area over the crop canopy, subject to assumptions of air current uptake, atmospheric diffusion and wind shear, all of which can affect and reduce spore longevity (Mousanejad et al. 2009) Survival of spores while airborne may also be affected by temperature, solar and ultraviolet radiation, in addition to relative humidity (Deacon, 2005). Based on this literature, we applied a simple metric and assumed that spore cohorts have a half-life of three days within any seven-day window. For each 24 period during which these conditions were met, the model accumulates values that result in a blast spore 'index' that is used to estimate the risk of outbreak. The model also determines the number and timing of days with climatic conditions favoring blast infection using a conditional ruleset. Days favoring infection (DFI) are consequently declared following spore cloud development when the daily maximum temperature exceeded 23°C, and when temperature amplitude (calculated as the daily minimum temperature subtracted from daily maximum temperature) was > 15°C, with mean daily RH above 70%, as in Equation 1. Rain can also damage conidiophore and/or was freshly deposited spores off of leaves and wheat spikes (Mousanejad et al. 2009;Suzuki (1975). If > 5mm of rain is accumulated within a 24-hour period, DFI is set to non-favorable.The This method of coupling the influence of pests with the wheat crop model, which was achieved with an MPI, has the potential to improve wheat simulations in disease and pest-prone environments, and provide better assistance in crop management decision-making. An MPI can be described as a standardized set of libraries for parallel and high-performance computing, consisting in exchanging messages between processes (Figure 2). It is frequently used as communication switches where applications can be written in different programming languages and easily communicate each other, sharing information through a communicator/interface. In this way, MPI shows up as an architecture independent and efficient strategy to exchange information (Browne andWilson, 2015, Fernandes et al. 2019a). A message passing interface parallel technique was developed for an agroecosystem model, EPIC on global food and bioenergy studies (Kang et al. 2015).To achieve these aims, non-relational open source database known as MongoDB was utilized to implement a flexible structured data schema. This permitted the storage and retrieval of experimental data and model-required input data. Preliminary efforts to facilitate model coupling and calibrate this model in Bangladesh are described in this report. Our work to couple the models is novel and is intended to predict yield in the presence or absence of wheat blast. Field experiments to calibrate model performance were carried out in Bangladesh in the 2017-18 and 2018-2019 winter 'rabi' season wheat growing periods (Figure 3). The experiment was replicated in three locations in Bangladesh. A split-plot design six wheat cultivars and five sowing dates was utilized across three replicates. to be blast resistant). Seed was sown by hand at between 5-7 cm depth following two tillage passes and covered with soil. Seed rates were 120 kg ha -1 for all varieties exempting BARI Gom 33 which tillers poorly, for which rates were increased by 20 kg ha -1 .Fertilizers were applied at elemental rates of 100-27-40-20-1 kg ha -1 of N-P-K-S-B. Two-thirds of N and the full amount of the other fertilizers were applied basally. The remaining N split was applied immediately before the first irrigation near crown root initiation (17-21 days after sowing (DAS)). Three light irrigations no more than 5 cm deep were applied. The first was applied as described above, the second and third irrigations were applied at booting (50-55 DAS) and grainfilling (70-75 DAS) stages. Weeds were controlled to reduce any competition with the crop.Observations of 50% anthesis and 80% maturity dates were recorded by trained technicians for all plots in all locations. After excluding 20 cm borders to minimize edge effects, the remaining plot was harvested at physiological maturity a corrected to a moisture content of 12% for grain.Canopy biomass was also measured from the same surface after sun drying to a constant weight.The DSSAT-Nwheat model combination requires daily precipitation, maximum and minimum air temperature, and solar radiation as standard weather inputs. In Bangladesh, these inputs were taken from HOBO automated weather stations (Bourne, MA, USA) placed at 2 m height from less than 200 m from the experiments. Any gaps in data due to equipment malfunction were filled with data from the nearest Bangladesh Department of Meteorology (BMD) synoptic observation station. The wheat blast simulator required hourly temperature and relative humidity data from the same sources. Where only three-hourly data were available (as was the case with BMD stations), data were interpolated to obtain hourly values.Because a pest simulation module in DSSAT has been made accessible to the DSSAT-Nwheat model, a communication approach using an MPI was used to couple the parameterized wheat blast model to DSSAT-Nwheat as described above that simulated yield loss (Figure 4). When applied in Bangladesh, the genetic coefficients of the model were refined to numerically represent the genotypic constitution of wheat cultivar BARI Gom 26, BARI Gom 28, BARI Gom 30, BARI Gom 31 BARI Gom 32 and BARI Gom 33. These coefficients express all relevant information regarding the life cycle, distribution and duration of each phenological stage, growth rates indexes, biomass distribution and reproductive processes. To achieve this aim, we developed a customized graphical user interface (GUI) to enhance researchers' capability to manipulate DSSAT-Crop Simulation Model (CSM) files to achieve simulation and data visualization goals. As such, an interactive library that could provide a mechanism for reading, writing and processing different DSSAT-CSM created. The GUI was developed using the jDSSAT (de Abreu Resendes et al. 2019), a multiplatform JavaScript module.The jDSSAT provides a standard and reusable approach for reading and processing DSSAT files.Through this approach, we isolate the complexity of processing DSSAT files to allow DSSAT integration in any environment. The DSSAT-Nwheat application uses the MongoDB database to store outputs from simulations and collates these alongside observed data. The R software embedded in the application enables the development of a more robust and flexible graphs within the user interface. This in turn, allows GUI users to produce graphs of simulated outputs with observed data and associated statistics that simulate disease inflicted yield losses.The goal of this research was to develop a proof of concept that models could be coupled to simulate wheat blast impact on yield in Bangladesh. To this end, we calibrated the DSSAT-Nwheat CSM by comparing it to experimental results. DSSAT-Nwheat model calibration was achieved by manipulating the genetic coefficients of each cultivar by iterative trial and error until observed data sufficiently matched simulated data.The DSSAT crop models require genetic coefficients, which are specific for each cultivar to describe the processes related to plant growth and development adequately. These coefficients concede the model to simulate the performance of different genotypes under various soil, weather, and management conditions. The model was calibrated using field measured meteorological variables, crop management and soil properties during the field trial cropping seasons in 2017-19 and 2018-19. Genetic coefficients were estimated by using observed anthesis and physiological maturity dates, canopy biomass and grain yield of wheat cultivars growing during the three seasons.Initial values of the genetic coefficients were obtained from the cultivars Bari Gom 26 and Bari Gom 28, already available in the APSIM (Donald S Gaydon, personal information). An iterative approach was used to obtain reasonable genetic coefficients through trial and error adjustments until there was a match between the observed and simulated dates of anthesis and physiological maturity, canopy biomass and grain yield. The derived genetic coefficients were used for model performance evaluation, and are available for the wheat cultivars BARI Gom 26, 28, 30, 31, 32 and 33 are presented in Annex 1.We implemented three virtual experiments for the wheat cultivars using the customized GUI and simulated wheat productivity performance with and without the blast model coupling given measured weather conditions in the 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 wheat growing seasons. We hypothesized that We speculate that temperature during January -the month prior to when the wheat crop usually enters into the reproductive stage -is vital for the inoculum build up and during February for infection. Data were explored using descriptive statistics and plotting modeled vs. observed data for each variety tested considering the number of days to anthesis, maturity, yield and canopy biomass.We utilized a case study to explore the model coupling described above. Our virtual case study concerns a fictitious situation where a wheat crop is planned to be cultivated in Jessore, Bangladesh. Using the modeling environment developed in this research, we constrained the potential yield of this hypothetical wheat crop by introducing wheat blast disease infection. This hypothetical experiment that included the simulation of the wheat susceptible cultivar Bari Gom 26, which was 'grown' in the simulation environment with and without the impact of wheat blast introduced to the model. This virtual experiment was simulated over the wheat growing seasons of 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18 and examined yield patterns in relation to expert knowledge of the level of wheat-blast induced yield losses in each of these cropping seasons. Soil profile and weather data for the locality of Jessore was obtained from the global soil data base and the Bangladesh Meteorological Department, respectively.The mean of the minimum temperature observed during January in the three locations was 8.23 C and 10.35C respectively, in 2018 and 2019 (Figure 5). The mean of the maximum temperature An inverse relationship between sowing date and in yield has been observed by a number of research groups in South Asia and is associated with terminal heat stress (Farooq et al. 2011;Mondal et al., 2013;Krupnik et al., 2015;Arshad et al. 2018). Heat stress in wheat can cause a reduction in pollen sterility and desiccation of stigma that result in lower seed set and grain filling (Reynolds et al. 2016). Data from three of the four site-seasons in this experiment appear to generally confirm this relationship, although variability and idiosyncratic yield observations in 2018-19 in both Jashore and Rajshahi underscore that other factors -such as storm events and consequent lodging -can disrupt this pattern.In addition, data from Jashore and Rajshahi in the 2017-18 seasons indicate yield decline is not always immediate. In both of these cases, yield declined precipitously on the last sowing date but was generally more stable in crops established on November 25, December 2, December 12, December 22. Yet in order to validate these patterns, these experiments remain ongoing at the time of writing in February of 2020 and will continue for an additional three seasons to come at all locations.Disease-free DSSAT-N-Wheat simulations for grain yield in Dinajpur, Jashore, and Rajshahi showed a more consistent trend of yield decline ranging from a high of just over 5,000 kg ha -1 of under 2,500 kg ha -1 across simulated locations as a function of progressively later sowing dates (Figure 8).This inverse relationship is more in line with literature on terminal heat stress and negative effects on yield when wheat is sown late in South Asia (Farooq et al. 2011;Mondal et al., 2013;Krupnik et al., 2015;Arshad et al. 2018). Simulation results however did not capture the site-and seasonspecific variability and idiosyncratic results observed in in 2018-19 in both Jashore and Rajshahi where lodging and other factors affected the expression of yield. Yields were also generally higher in the northern most location (Dinajpur) relative to the southernmost location (Jashore). The latter also had the lowest simulated yields with both early and late sowing. In general, simulated yield patterns showed the order Dinajpur > Rajshahi > Jashore across sowing dates.observed data. This indicates only a few days of error and is important as wheat can be particularly susceptible to wheat blast in the reproductive stage (Cruz & Valent, 2017). As such, accurate phenological prediction is important in linked disease-crop growth model development.All of these results should however be taken as preliminary and not as definitive. Efforts to further improve model calibration and fit with observed data will be undertaken with ongoing experiments in the growing season of 2019/2020. The DSSAT-Nwheat provides, in a daily step, the total seed mass to the disease model, which calculates the daily damage caused by wheat blast infection, returning back through the coupling points an estimate of the fraction of seed mass loss. Simulated outputs for virtual experiments of the coupled models conducted using weather data for the 2015-16, 2017-19, and 2018-19 wheat season in Jessore showed a grain yield decline for BARI Gom 26 progressively later sowing dates in the first but not subsequent seasons (Figure 9). In the growing season of 2015-16, a wheat blast outbreak was observed for the first time in Bangladesh (Malaker et al., 2016;Mottaleb et al. 2018).The weather conditions and an increase in temperature provided circumstances for fungal infection (data not shown). During this season, nearly 15,000 ha were affected (approximately 3.5% of Bangladesh's wheat area) with yield declines reported from 5-51% (Islam et al., 2016).Our preliminary simulation efforts show a reduction in yield of up to 20% with the disease introduced to the DSSAT-Nwheat model. The next following growing seasons had cooler weather, thus, diminishing the risk for wheat blast. When data were simulated for the 2016-17 wheat season in Jessore, blast disease introduction had nearly no effect. These limited simulated yield loss values for the both cropping season are to some extent supported by large-scale field surveillance that was undertaken by the BWMRI, CIMMYT and Cornell University throughout Bangladesh in early 2017. Out of 800 wheat fields surveyed in 25 districts of Bangladesh, only 77 showed symptoms of blast. Those that with blast however all had very low levels of infection and negligent yield or economic impact (data not shown). Similarly, low levels of disease were found in the 2017-18 seasons. Surveillance from repeat visits to 616 fields across Bangladesh during this season indicated that than 5 ha across Bangladesh were found to have infections throughout the, and those that did registered blast severity <20% (http://34.80.72.205/model/samplingwheatblast). The epidemic and non-epidemic years can be considering as case studies to evaluate the model linkage in comparison to the progression of the disease.After rice, wheat is the second most widely grown and consumed cereal crop in Bangladesh. After the introduction of the wheat blast pathogen that occurred and caused an epidemic in 2016, is necessary to understand the impact and potential for continued disease risks yield under different production environments, especially to address future climate change impacts on disease development and crop performance. Although a second wheat blast outbreak has not again occurred in Bangladesh, the risk of epidemics remains very real.The original weather-data riven disease model that this report is based on was developed in Brazil and validated for locations where more than a decade of wheat blast observations were available.This model was subsequently transferred to Bangladesh. The overall objective is to develop a flexible computing environment that will eventually permit model users to explore a range of sowing dates, weather conditions, and cultivar effects on wheat blast infection. In this report, we detailed efforts to calibrate DSSAT-Nwheat was calibrated for Dinajpur, Jashore and Rajshahi environments using field experimental data collected over three years. The performance of the model was evaluated through phenology, biomass at harvest, and grain yield. sorghum yields in India. This will involve using APSIM_sorghum as a decision support tool to design suitable crop and management interventions for particular locations and to optimize rabi sorghum systems productivity. The validated modelling set-up from prior work is being used and being spatially refined to suit this particular purpose. The model refinement includes parameterization of the elite sorghum material into APSIM. This tool will allow assessment of particular GxM fitness to particular production zones (E), development of novel approaches, and its quantitative advantage over standard Maldandi cultivar (M35-1) and standar management practices. Such improved set-up will be further used to design the site-specific optimal genotypex management (G×M) options, which have higher probability to increase productivity in specific regions of rabi-sorghum production tract in India. The most relevant of predicted GxM options will be tested in multi-location trials in-vivo to clearly demonstrate and validate the tool for practical on-ground use of such modeling framework. The project is planned for three years and all the data obtained from the project and resulting publications will be available open-source.APSIM Sorghum was run for 30 years using gridded AgMERRA weather data in 311 grids covering all the rabi sorghum grown districts of Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Karnataka and Telangana. Information on soil parameters (collected from National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, International Soil Reference and Information Centre), crop cultivar parameters and management parameters are given to initialize the simulation. The conditional sowing window was set as 25 September to 15 October with a minimum of 9 mm rain within 5 days required to trigger sowing. If these requirements are met, APSIM will initiate the sowing of the crop at the density of 12 plants m −2 . Other crop management practices used for modeling were based on standard methods for growing sorghum (Rooney et al., 2007;Olson et al., 2012). The soil moisture profile at sowing time was assumed to be fully saturated in all grids because rabi sorghum is usually cultivated after the rainy season on the recharged soil profile and in addition, farmers often use pre-sowing irrigation before cultivation to ensure adequate moisture in the soil (Trivedi, 2009). After setting the baseline setup, different G × M options were tested in silico in all the grids of rabi sorghum regions.Different G × M options tested were: The APSIM sorghum model (APSIM ver 7.6) was run for 30 years with 13,824 GxM combinations in 311 grids. Thus in total 4299264 simulations needed to be run to generate the output files. This is time consuming and requires huge storage capacities to hold the generated output files. The setup files for the simulations can be generated and run by the Factorial feature of the APSIM. However, it cannot handle that amount of simulations. By using supporting software tools for automation and scheduling it is possible to tackle these large numbers of simulations. The simulations were generated by a custom software solution. Researchers from Department of Information Technologies, Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic assisted the team in developing a special application which generates simulations and runs them in batches. The detailed description regarding the data preprocessing is documented by Jarolimek et al., 2019 and available at https://econpapers.repec.org/article/agsaolpei/294144.htm. Running that amount of simulations on a single computer would take huge amount of time. Therefore, the batches were run in parallel on 7 high performance computers (128GB RAM, 16 core AMD Ryzen CPUs). Biplot Analysis: Biplots of results of principal component analysis (PCA) indicating the correlations between the selected traits for all the grids across all the soils.We developed a system using flags to mark questionable records. The advantage of using flags is that subsequent users can filter the data by their own criteria and it also allows for preserving the original data. A main portion of our time has been devoted on developing an algorithm to estimate the missing phenology data. The collaborators reported date of sowing, date of emergence, days to heading, anthesis and maturity. However, not all records are complete. Fortunately, we have phenology data for most years and trials, which enables us to predict the missing data points. Knowledge on the timing of key phenological events in combination with daily and hourly weather data is paramount for the understanding of the performance of the lines that had been tested.We conducted a preliminary cluster analysis in order to determine as to whether there was any remarkable change in the grouping of the test sites between the 1985-1994 and 2005-2014 decades due to changes in weather conditions. Please note that these clusters differ from CIMMYT's mega-environments: We included all sites at which the three nurseries had been grown. However, not all sites are representative for spring wheat, e.g., in the North China Plain as well as in Central Europe, winter wheat is predominantly grown. We did not consider any crop management information, such as irrigation and only included a key set of weather variables in the clustering analysis. We used the seasonal averages of daily weather variables, such as maximum and minimum temperature, solar radiation, photothermal quotient, relative humidity, number of days at which maximum temperature exceeded 35º C, and number of days at which minimum temperature was below 9º C. We will use these clusters to determine as to whether some lines perform relatively better in specific environments (clusters) than in other ones. Moreover, we wanted to see whether the clustering of the locations may have changed due to climate change. The cluster analysis revealed that most test sites stayed in their clusters, and only few sites, mainly in India and Africa switched from one cluster to another one (Fig 1). Furthermore, we analyzed the trends of cross-over of yield of the ESWYT, HTWYT, and semi-arid spring wheat nurseries (SAWYT). This included regression analyses and principal factor analyses between yield cross-over and growing-season climatic variables, in order to investigate the significant climatic factors that drive a cross-over. We are using a shifted multiplicative model (SHMM), additive and multiplicative models to quantify relationships between cross-over and environment. We also started close collaboration with Dr. M. Krause, a US-NSF fellow, who will link the phenology data from the nurseries to genomics. Information resulting from these analyses will allow for fast and efficient selection of new wheat lines with an optimal phenology that fits into changing wheat production environments caused by global warming.well as a 2-page implementation brief about minimum experimental data required for crop modeling and analytical purposes among CGIAR centers.The outputs and deliverables will include:1) Support in the elaboration of a manuscript that makes specific recommendations on minimum datasets for a range of crop modeling activities,2) Support in the elaboration of a 2-page implementation brief about minimum experimental data required for crop modeling and analytical purposes among CGIAR centers3) Blog post about the outcomes from the project.The impact of the proposed project will be an awareness to the crop modeling community and experimentalists of the importance in minimum experimental parameters that need to be collected to make more datasets available for crop modeling and system understanding purposes. The outputs from the project will be made available to the international crop modeling community through the Crop Modeling CoP and AgMIP -one of the largest international research communities with more than 900 members. This will ensure great visibility of the potential impact of the Big Data Platform in CGIAR for other scientific communities, with broader implications for future research direction and policy makers.From the first records in the 18 th century in Europe daily weather has been observed and recorded; it was crucial for the agricultural revolution in England. Researchers have long used these data for agronomic and grazing studies, some of these go back to not long after the records began.The ethos of data collection for the agricultural world spread to European colonies around the world. These were used to plan and manage plantations. Tea in Kenya and Assam, cacao in western Africa, rubber in the Malay peninsula and cotton in America.All of these analyses were done on a point basis; if meteorological data were need then they had to be recorded at the point of use. Early methods of interpolation relied on climate classifications, which could be mapped; Kӧppen (1884) is an example. Digital versions of climate data, for example Hijmans et. al (2005) are useful for GIS application where environmental indices can be calculated from the monthly climate data.Daily data are generally needed For crop modelling, but these are far too voluminous to store in a high-resolution global coverage. This problem is compounded by the need to include realistic variation, both short term and annual, in modelling analyses. One solution to this is to use a weather generator. MarkSim is a daily rainfall generator devised for the tropics in CIAT and ILRI in the late 1990's building on work at CIAT from the previous 15 years; Jones & Thornton, (1993, 1997, 1999, 2000), Jones et. al. (2002). More recently, see Jones & Thornton (2013), we have added a capability to simulate future weather sequences from a suite of GCM models, MarkSimGCM a standalone version is available in an EXE as MarkSim_Standalone.The weather generator needs all of the monthly climate values in one record and so the MetGrid file was born. This eventually used the data layers of WorldClim. This work is to update the MarkSim application data with the new data from WorldClim v2.0, Fick & Hijmans (2017). The outputs are a new set of MetGrid files at 10, 5 and 2.5 arc minutes and 30 arc seconds, and sets of CLI files, which can be used as input to the stand-alone version of MarkSim or as input to other weather generators. Until now, MetGrid files have not been available to the general user; this changes with this version and they will be available for download from CCAFS at CIAT. As they are a highly specialised format, a Fortran module, MetGrid_Handler, has been produced for general distribution to assist their use.The basic MetGrid structure was created in the late '80s for various applications in CIAT that used long-term climate data from the CIAT Climate Database. In those days GIS was rudimentary and using single variable coverages for any calculation more complicated than simple overlay was out of the question. The CIAT Climate Database (later to be incorporated into WorldClim) held individual station data. These were interpolated into 10 minute and 5 minute grids, but instead of storing the grids by monthly variates, I devised the MetGrid file so that calculations such as water balance, length of season, climate and land classification and varietal suitability could all be calculated directly, pixel by pixel, using Fortran programs.For a start, a MetGrid file is not a grid file. It is a space-conserving file can be used to construct derived climate grids throughout the world. The base data are from WorldClim v2.0 with the exception of the number of rain days that are derived from MarkSim v1.0. MetGrid files come in four resolutions; 10 arc-minutes, 5 arc-minutes, 2.5 arc-minutes and 30 arc-seconds. The big difference from the WorldClim files is that all variates are represented in one record.The MetGrid files are not raster grids, or, in fact, any sort of grid, and so they have to carry additional data to identify the record. This is simply the Latitude, longitude, and median elevation of the pixel. MetGrid v1.0 used the latitude and longitude of the lower left corner of the pixel, but we found that rounding errors made it difficult to translate easily to normal GIS grids. In version 2 we've decided on the latitude and longitude of the centre of the pixel. The user will now find no problem with translating any MetGrid to a raster image using the functions in the MetGrid_handler module. MetGrid records are stored as binary record in order from North to South in lines of longitude from West to East, but non-land areas are not recorded. There is therefore no simple relationship between a record number in the MetGrid file and a raster map. In order to overcome this the full MetGrid fileset is a group of three files with dedicated file extensions. They should always be copied together as a unit or the full functioning of the MetGrid will be impaired.They consist of a file header, extension .hdr, which describes the fileset. It is a small ASCII file such as this one for the 10 arc minute dataset. Note that although the contents appear to MarkSim Record. describe a raster grid dataset, the MetGrid is not; what is being described here is the grid that it represents.World2_10m.mtg Author P.G. The use of 12-bit words in modern computing is unusual, but the type and quality of the data in this case lend themselves to it, considerably reducing record size and hence file size. The extra computation involved can be offset against the reduced seek and read times from the file which will only have to be produced once. The overall record does conform to standard 32-bit word boundaries, and so it is read efficiently.The variates are: The index file (extension .idx) is a binary file that can efficiently relate a latitude and longitude to a single record in the direct access .mtg file without involving multiple reads and searches. It is essentially a run length encoded file by lines of latitude. The run length encoded values are simply presence or absence of a land based pixel and the identity of the target record within the .mtg file can be returned with the absolute minimum of computation. Each .idx is specific to the resolution of the .mtg file and so must never be separated from it.The use of MarkSim and the MetGrid files requires an understanding of climate rotation. The following section was taken mainly from the original manuals of FloraMap, MarkSim and Homologue, where it is crucial in the operation of these applications.The climatic events that occur through the year, such as summer/winter and start/finish of the rainy season, are of prime importance when comparing one climate with another. Unfortunately, they occur at different dates in many climate types. The most obvious case is where we compare climates between points in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, but more subtle differences occur in climate event timing throughout the tropics. What we need is a method of eliminating these differences to allow us to make comparisons free of these annual timing effects.Let us look at two hypothetical climate stations. They are in a typical Mediterranean climate-warm wet winters, hot dry summers. Northville could be somewhere in California, and Southville might be in Chile. The August rainfall in Southville happens in January in Northville (Figure 3.3). If we plot these rainfalls in polar coordinates, we can readily see that to compare them we need to rotate them to a standard time. How do we do this automatically? The answer is the 12-point Fourier transform. This is fortunately the simplest of all the possible Fourier transform algorithms. It is highly computationally efficient and fast. It takes the 12 monthly values and converts them to a series of sine and cosine functions. The one used in MarkSim has a modification to make it conserve the monthly total values (Jones, 1987). The equation produced is:We can write this as a series of frequency vectors, each with an amplitude I, and a phase angle, i: If we subtract the first phase angle from all the other vectors in the set, we have produced a rigid rotation of the vectors; this is the rotation we want, it puts the maximum of the first frequency at a phase angle of zero and places the rest in positions equivalent to their angular separation in the original data. We then use the first phase angle for rainfall to rotate the data for temperature and diurnal temperature range, which we rotate through the same angle. This explanation works well for the tropics. There was a small chance of the procedure going off the rails if the rainfall record did not have a seasonal peak. This was the case in some records from tropical desert regions, in these cases the rotation was ambiguous and sometimes resulted in pixels allocated to the wrong cluster. The beta release of MarkSim went out with this type of rotation algorithm, as did the first release of FloraMap. When the climate grids of the latter were extended to Europe, the case arose where annual climate pattern was dominated by temperature and not rainfall.We therefore have the possibility of rotating on rainfall or temperature, but when to decide which is the dominant? We tried many combinations of rules, but unfortunately came to the conclusion that none were acceptable. They all resulted in a hard line across the map at some point where the rotation basis changed. This led to climates that should have been grading imperceptibly from one type to another suddenly jumping at a discontinuity. This would have given the users serious problems when fitting models in these areas.The best solution found is to use BOTH the rainfall and the temperature in calculating the rotation phase angle. Thus: Unfortunately, this does not completely solve the problem of fitting a model to climates with different weather determinants. However, the vast majority of climates in the world are either:(1) Rainfall determined where temperature is not an important seasonal effect (large areas of the tropics and subtropics); (2) Temperature determined where rainfall is even throughout the year (most of the rest of the tropics and some temperate climates); or (3) Rainfall and temperature determined when the two variates are highly correlated (summer rains -most of the rest of the world).The Odd Man Out is: (4) Winter rains and hot dry summers (almost only Mediterranean climates).Luckily, the Mediterranean climates are at moderately high latitudes and we can afford to have the rotation dominated by temperature without losing generality in the rotations and comparisons. We therefore need to increase the weighting for the temperature vector smoothly as we approach the Mediterranean climates (in order to avoid a sudden swing). The index marked OK at 0.79 indicates (see Fig 7) an angle of 90 degrees between the two vectors if they are of equal length that denotes a reasonably stable rotation angle. It also corresponds to the case where one vector dominates the phase angle, which is also acceptable. The perfect confidence is found in the subtropics there the two vectors point in same direction. The equatorial regions and some Mediterranean regions have vectors pointing to different degrees in opposite direction. Luckily, none of these areas reaches the level where the phase angle is completely indefinite. The highest index noted is about 1.1, which is equivalent to an angle of about 120 degrees between two vectors of the same length. While this is somewhat indeterminate, there is still enough purchase to get a unique phase angle for rotation A Fortran module contains data structure definitions that specify defined type variables that allow the grouping of various types of data into structured data units, and sets of functions or subroutines that use these units or operate on them. The module is invoked from within a Fortran program with the use command thus: use MetGrid_HandlerThe structure most likely to be interpreted by the user, in that the internal variables will be used in a Fortran program is the climate_structure. Most of the others are specific to the internal workings of the module and so are mostly only minimally described. Some variables are used within the module, but are defined as public as they may be of use in a program using the module. These include halfpi, pi and twopi as real*4, eof, year, month and day as integer*4 and month_code as an array of 12 three byte character representations of the calendar month. If the MetGrid header has been read then it is held in the variable h. Lastly, two logical*4 variables header_loaded and index_loaded indicate if the respective loading has been done.The index arrays are defined as private and are only accessed within the module; module routines to access MetGrid records use the loaded index arrays.As with the variable structures, not all module functions are necessarily called by the end user. Some have to be included because they are called by end-user functions; others are there because they are of use in the administration of the files.These four function rely on having the MetGrid header loaded in public variable h B04 type (climate_structure) function rotate_climate (c, phase) care must be taken when using this function as it can do one of three things depending on the call and the state of the climate_structure. parameters c type (climate_structure), input will not be changed unless specified as the function target. phase real*4, optional. a phase angle radians, may be any magnitude but will be used modulo twopi.1) If phase is specified the structure is rotated through the angle, 'phase' irrespective of whether the structure is rotated or not. 2) if phase is not specified and the structure is rotated, ti will be rotated to zero phase angle i.e. true calendar time. 3) if phase is not specified and the structure is not rotated, then a new, natural, phase angle will be calculated for the structure and it will be rotated to this angle.This function transforms a climate_structure into a MetGrid_record. This is used in creation of the MetGrids, but can be used as a handy way to save climate_structures by writing them to a binary file, the record length should be 104 bytes.As for null_climate, this is a way of creating an empty metgrid_record.None of these routines need concern the end user as they are all subsumed into rotate_climate. However, I will briefly describe them so that the end user may gain an insight into what is happening. They all have to be present in the module because they are interdependent and used on the working of rotate_climate.This function creates a new climate_structure such that the rotation angle is the definitive angle that rotates the structure to match similar climates. It cannot be used if the structure is already rotatedThis routine correct for small errors that are sometimes introduced during rotation. These are notices on variates that cannot go negative, such as rain and raindays. They are an artefact of the rotation process, but are invariably small and can be eliminated parameter v 12 valued real*4 array, declared as input and output R03 subroutine rotate (v, phase) Rotate a 12 valued variate array through a phase angle. Although there may be times when this routine is appropriate, it is dangerous as the array is divorced from any structure and no internal knowledge of the state of previous rotation is known. !4 Use the index to find the record at latitude 52.737, longitude -3.883, Dolgellau, actually the Unicorn Inn. read from the MetGrid file on unit 1 and return an error if the position turns out to be in the sea.!5 Make the climate structure from the MetGrid record !6The MetGrid is always rotated. This is because the majority of the uses for a MetGrid file require the data in the rotated form. This line rotates the record to normal calendar form so that August is actually month 8.Rainfall is stored as rain per day. This has the advantage of being independent of month length, however this is available from the module.Find Abermaw (Barmouth) with coordinates from an unreliable map. This is an example of how having all of the monthly variables together in one record can be handy for calculations. That the index is pretty useless is irrelevant, still, it brings up the hilly terrain quite nicely. I apologise for slipping in the image_processing module which is not available on this site. Phil Thornton and I use it extensively to produce Idrisi Images from Fortran programs but I've never got round to documenting it. If any would like a copy please contact me at p.jones@cgiar.org Grid functions are basic to using the MetGrid file in a grid oriented way. They take all relevant information from the MetGrid header, which must be loaded.!2 These are statements relevant to the production of the Idrisi image, you could use any other format for the production of the map image. They are indented one extra tab to indicate that they are not basic to the calculation.Error return is used here to skip all other processing when a pixel is all at sea.There is no need to rotate the structure in this case because we are only interested in the total of the monthly indices. Of course the rotation angle is unlikely to fall such that monthly values are exactly conserved. I will leave it to the interested reader to produce the alternative map with the structure rotated back to standard calendar to see what difference this would make. Hint! You don't need to produce two images, merely do two calculation on each pixel and subtract one from the other. The resultant image will be the difference of the two.The CLI pane descriptor is both a file that can be found in the compressed copy of each pane and a Fortran type descriptor for the information contained therein. As can be seen above, the pane descriptor has a directory definition. This is more for the analysts implementing the application than for the end user, but it can be used to structure the directories for the panes if the user so wishes. The directories define 40 degree squares to hold copes of the compressed panes of CLI files.The panes are made of CLI files from a geographic square of 120 pixels on the side. This means that the pane sizes are 20 degrees of latitude and longitude for the 10 arc minute resolution and 10 and 5 degrees for the 5 arc minute and 2.5 arc minute ones respectively. The maximum number of files in a pane is therefore 14400, but this is only found in panes that do not include a coastline.The pane name is constructed from the coordinates, in degrees, of the south western corner of the pane, it is given in the pane descriptor file and is used as the name of the compressed structure, i.e. N020E020.rar. The CLI files are named by row and column, thus: R01921C04801.CLI. Note that the row and column numbers are those of the virtual grid of the MetGrid file and not row and column within the pane. This is to ensure that all CLI files have unique names, however the names will not be unique between resolutions so it is important to keep the three sets separate if you are using more than one. The SOURCE field with the CLI file will define the resolution, but this would involve reading the file to determine its resolution.The CLI files and the pane descriptor file are compressed using WinRAR with the -s option to benefit from compressing multiple files with the same structure. This yields a compression to half","tokenCount":"12693"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1184523044.json b/data/part_2/1184523044.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c8785a24c656889d261a023b57e746088bfcdd89 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1184523044.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a919017082aaba94daff64c258550617","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/b5395b62-bd42-4ed6-9c2a-5a543f0c6d3e/retrieve","id":"959672994"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"365546d0-e796-4f33-bff5-75f7537fbbba","pagecount":"8","content":"With population growth far exceeding growth in staple food production, and climate change beginning to take its toll, does Africa have the time to rectify the situation? In many Southern African countries population growth has been slowed by HIV and AIDS related mortality, but so has productivity in agriculture. Poverty and malnutrition continue unabated yet these at the same time hold back agricultural productivity improvements and broader economic recovery, thus condemning the sub-region to a perpetual cycle of poverty, underdevelopment and social and economic deprivation.For decades a key barrier to the achievement of a green revolution in Africa, and Southern Africa especially, has remained and still is the unsupportive policy environment. What is urgently needed to break this barrier is known; these are inclusive and broad-based policy reforms that create and provide incentives at every stage of the food value chain to encourage higher investment into the food sector. Yet, the policy formulation culture in many countries remains inhibitive, typically top-down, populist and dominated by the governments and the few literate. Policies are often recycled without sufficient learning from previous policy failures (or successes). This raises the question whether we know how to learn from our own experiences? National and regional platforms for broad-based policy formulation are often absent, neither is there sufficient documented evidence on what works (and what does not) to inform policy choices. Think tanks are unfortunately too few. Policy research is irregular and not credible due to poor funding and lack of skills to package high quality research outputs. National universities for example are generally poorly funded and fail to attract and retain top-notch researchers. Whilst farmers know what works and what does not, they are often excluded in policy formulation. At best they are engaged when it is too late, often creating the impression they are needed to rubber stamp policy decisions already finalised at higher political levels.One of the critical barriers affecting the policy input from farmers in Southern Africa is the disconnect between farmers and researchers. In addition, most farmers are small scale, illiterate, not well organised and usually not well informed. The voice of many involved in small scale farming is weak and hardly heard especially in regional and global policy dialogue.The Food Agriculture and Natural Resources Network (FANRPAN) was set up in 1997 with a specific mandate from the FANR Ministers in Eastern and Southern Africa to address capacity weaknesses in policy formulation in the region. FANRPAN has already succeeded to create a regional stakeholder platform that brings together farmers, the private sector, government, NGOs and researchers in SADC, ESA and COMESA to dialogue on critical policy issues. FANRPAN is creating the opportunities for policy dialogue and the exchange of ideas directly between farmers in the field, researchers in laboratories, think-tanks and policy makers in conference rooms and parliaments throughout Africa.To help bring its constituency together, FANRPAN's has national nodes in 13 member states with a national secretariat hosted by an existing national institution in each country that has a mandate for increasing agricultural research and advocacy. But these institutions (nodes) have different levels of capacity. As a result, a key thrust of FANRPAN's current Strategic Business Plan (2008-15) is to strengthen the capacity of these nodes to become more effective hubs of policy research, information collection, documentation and sharing, and providing policy advice with sufficient credibility to influence policy decisions.There are many opportunities to be exploited, but so are the challenges that confront FANRPAN's work on capacity building of nodes. This Newsletter is dedicated to discussing these opportunities and challenges focusing on issues such as: governance and leadership, operations and management systems, human-resources management, financial management systems, capacity for programming and service delivery, and external relations and advocacy strategies.Governance structures of FANRPAN nodes vary markedly in their strength. They range from nodes with well-functioning Boards of Trustees, that are democratically appointed, abiding by the constitution, providing strategic guidance and exercising good control over activities of the nodes through well-articulated strategic plans and well laid out board procedures, to nodes whose boards are inactive and are not properly constituted. In building capacity of nodes in the area of governance, FANRPAN has the opportunity to draw from best practice among its own constituency and promote crosslearning between the boards. Boards that have the capacity to provide the necessary oversight and strategic direction on the operations of their organisations but lack a clear strategic plan will be immediately supported to develop these as vehicles for resource mobilisation. Such strategic plans should articulate clearly the vision, mission and values of the nodes, as well as key result areas and clear strategies. Each plan should have a coherent results framework and a result-oriented budget to guide resource mobilisation and monitoring and evaluation.In strengthening node governance structures, FANRPAN will also work with nodes to effectively widen the representation by increasing participation of civil society and the private sector. Some boards are dominated by government players, and this hinders effective engagement of other sectors in the activities of the nodes. As new board members are incorporated, nodes will be supported to develop board procedures and train board members and induct them on FANRPAN activities.Although some nodes have all the governance structures in place, they lack financial support to strengthen the operations of these structures, especially for the board to be able to meet regularly and exercise its leadership functions. FANRPAN seeks to provide such nodes with technical support to develop effective resource mobilisation strategies built upon their strategic plans, and also provide direct budgetary support for such node level activities. Nodes will be encouraged to incorporate their Board meetings if necessary into their cost estimated annual work plans.FANRPAN nodes that are hosted by government structures do not have the autonomy which could allow them to create their own governance and management tools. They are not free from vertical subordination to government structures and thus remain circumscribed to focus and scope of the broader government system when it comes to strategic envisioning. However, their strategic planning process and capacities will still be enhanced to maximise on the complementarities between the missions of the government and of FANRPAN.FANRPAN Newsletter -June 2010 FANRPAN Partners Meeting, Pretoria, South AfricaThe cycle of planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation usually lacks adequate support and capacity among many nodes. Although all nodes undertake planning around their missions, for some nodes, there is a clear need for greater involvement of their constituencies in planning and review. Planning and review need to be systematised, internalised and well funded. Most node strategic plans are implemented without a clear participatory monitoring and evaluation system. Few nodes actually evaluate the impact of their work. Hence results for their constituencies are not documented nor published. This practice often ricochets as nodes fail to mobilise resources from their constituencies for reason of non-visibility and failure to demonstrate the value of such investment. The current FANRPAN business plan seeks to offer concrete support to nodes in this area of developing sound M&E systems and institutionalising technically sound planning, monitoring and evaluation.Some nodes have outstanding administrative procedures including security systems for their assets, but others clearly need some strengthening. Policies on replacement of aged equipment are often absent, resulting in many nodes keeping equipment that is beyond its economic life.Many nodes urgently need support to modernise their information management systems, including ICTs. Almost all need to improve internet connectivity, secure new open system software and develop an effective management information system.As ICTs are at the centre of information communication strategies that FANRPAN requires for effective networking, this area is being given increasing attention, including not just assisting nodes to purchase ICTs but to interface the node e-resource platforms with those of the Regional Secretariat to enable nodes to upload and disseminate strategic outputs and information through the FANRPAN Regional Secretariat website and database.Attracting and retaining top-talent through strengthened human resources management systems In general, staff performance management systems are compromised, with little or no evi-dence of use of results-based management tools such as the balanced score card or dash-board. Time sheets to monitor staff productivity are rarely (if at all) used. Revamping staff performance management systems will require FANRPAN to adopt a staged approach, beginning with inculcation of basic concepts through training and then technological and software support to implement computerised staff performance management systems. FANRPAN will have to partner with competent HR management service providers to support the network with training and mentoring but through a node-led process.In addition, node resource mobilisation strategies will be bolstered through technical support and linking nodes with potential funders. This would be expected to increase income streams of nodes eventually enabling them to recruit more staff and/or offer existing staff more competitive salaries that motivate and contribute to staff retention. Such a strategy will go a long way to address the acute skills deficit in some nodes in the area of coordination, policy research, documenting and sharing results of policy dialogue sessions and championing policy advocacy.With the exception of nodes that are hosted by government institutions, many are in desperate need of predictable and unrestricted core funding for effective programming, a challenge also shared by the Regional Secretariat but which the network is devising strategies to address. Only a few nodes have their constituency contributing core-funding or generating revenue through cost-recovery measures. Some of the nodes which have succeeded in introducing annual subscriptions for members have only managed to secure nominal contributions which are hardly adequate monthly recurrent costs. Almost all nodes heavily rely on donor funds for support.Some nodes have medium-to-long term plans but these are yet to be used to adequately mobilise resources in the form of either internally generated revenue or pool funding from donors for programmatic support. As a result most nodes are implementing their strategic plans through fragmented donor funded projects, with some co-mingling the funds when disbursements for some of the projects arrive late.FANRPAN through the Regional Secretariat plans to strengthen financial management capacities of its nodes on results-oriented budgeting, budget tracking and donor reporting, a major area of its own strength. In addition, FANRPAN will assist the nodes to develop and implement sustainable resource mobilisation strategies in the context of a strengthened system of strategic planning.A few nodes (universities and line ministries) rely on government funding but which is usually not enough for planned activities. FANRPAN will build the capacity of these nodes to mobilise resources from outside government through both cost-recovery and strategic public-private sector partnerships.Research institutions (universities and policy research institutes) engage in commissioned consultancies to boost their financial inflows. FANRPAN will link these institutions to international bodies that require partners for policy research in the region, as well as commission own policy research using these members of the FANRPAN network. Alongside this support the Network will promote north-south partnerships that strengthen the analytical capacities of researchers in the region.Most of the research, documentation and publication activities of nodes are covered by donor funding, which is usually short term and unpre-dictable. Yet this function is critical for visibility and sustainability of the nodes and thus should be funded ideally with core-funds. To address this, nodes need support to develop resource mobilization strategies that will widen their funding base, facilitate resource sustainability and promote visibility and their competitiveness in the regional and global research and publication market.Ultimately nodes should have funding strategies that allow for some independence in programming. Reliance on donor funding hampers them from implementing their strategies with autonomy and holistically. This imposes the risk of mission creep as nodes try to respond to demands of donors and not necessary those of their constituencies. Hence FANRPAN will help nodes to speed up discussions with their constituencies on innovative self-financing mechanisms for sustainability. Some of the measures include cost-recovery, members' subscription fees and outdoor fundraising activities such as agricultural shows or market fairs where levies or gate collections can be collected.Finally, due to poor funding and staff shortage, some nodes have weak financial management systems, with no clear segregation of duties in finance. Some do not have senior personnel in their finance units. FANRPAN will invest significantly in building financial management systems of nodes. Such systems upgrading could focus on computerisation of accounts, development of sound accounting policies and procedures, strengthening corporate governance, and recruitment of accounts personnel (on temporary or permanent basis) with the requisite qualifications and experience to ensure adherence to general accepted international accounting standards.Many nodes, even with just a little support, are able to develop comprehensive strategic frameworks which they need to guide medium term programming, monitoring, evaluation and impact assessment. This is a critical area where FANRPAN will assist with technical and financial support to enable each node to formulate its own robust five-year strategic plan, operational plan and project proposals for possible funding.The strategic plans should spell out how the nodes will address staffing requirements. Nodes will be sensitised on the need to develop long term staff development plans and supported to implement them covering all categories of staff. FANRPAN will specifically assist nodes in identifying potential donors and lobbying for support.Some research-oriented nodes have outstanding research competencies, but results from research activities remain within the confines of the institution because they are viewed as an academic exercise, and not action-oriented.FANRPAN will enhance capacities for demanddriven research including linking its nodes to organisations that may need operational research services.To take on and successfully deliver the activities of FANRAN while the node continues with its regular mandate, skilled personnel dedicated specifically to FARPAN work are needed. Once in place such personnel can also strengthen the capacity of the node for its core mandate, for example with skills and financial resources to effectively market the work of the nodes as a whole rather than just FANRPAN-related. Many nodes already hold stakeholder platforms for dialogue, but resources are too few to followthrough resolutions or hold any follow-up meetings so as to continuously engage their constituency. Additional support to them would seeNodes continue to register growing successes in establishing forums for engagement of their constituencies as well as other critical stakeholders like the media and the private sector briefing them on node activities, various policy issues and mobilising a critical mass of voice for lobbying and advocacy. Nonetheless, many nodes need to improve packaging and dissemination of policy research results. Many are yet to develop media and public relations strategies, linking their work to regional and international policy dialogue, and strengthening and formalising collaboration with non-members of their constituency. FANRPAN Secretariat has been working on this, bringing on board media personnel to participate in Annual Dialogue Meetings and training them on to report appropriately on policy issues concerning the food, agriculture and natural resources sector. The lessons learned from this work will be filtered into the nodes to assist them in crafting media strategies.There is also evidence that some nodes have succeeded to engage in a wider range of internal and external networks and institutional collaborative activities to inform and sharpen their research agendas, better coordinate with others and pool the available resources. FANRPAN will complement these efforts by promoting their research collaboration and networking objectives, and negotiating space and resources for their involvement in policy-dialogue.FANRPAN Newsletter -June 2010 nodes able to continue to organise needed debates, bring on board the voiceless, and generate or provide the evidence needed for effective policy advocacy.To reach the voiceless, at times, policy dialogues have to be convened at the grassroots level, and cascade all the way up to national but due to limited resources dialogue starts and stays at the higher levels. The process is not a once off meeting, but a series of consultations and good tracking of key issues and main points of consensus. Such a capacity has to be resident in the node or outsourced by the node. Such multi-level process of engagement is critical for strong ownership first of the debates and secondly of their outcomes by the node's constituency. Indirectly, the node will have marketed its services, strengthened ownership of its programmes at all relevant levels and built a stronger base for support in resource mobilisa-tion. These capacities will be strengthened by helping the nodes to come up with effective networking and information communication systems and procedures to improve ownership of their country programmes by their members.FANRPAN Regional Secretariat will work with nodes to develop and implement effective monitoring and impact measurement systems. The aim also is to have all nodes use state-of-the-art communication facilities (reliable broad-band internet access). All nodes should ultimately have well populated, functional and up-to-date websites and teleconferencing facilities, with upgraded information sources and services, possessing the necessary capacity in their information centres to use new technologies, and offering information literacy training. This provides FANRPAN with many opportunities for strengthening node ICT and information dissemination capacities.","tokenCount":"2786"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1198737974.json b/data/part_2/1198737974.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..06ac3a0e9021dfa34bf5ec42044c590c4ae17fe3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1198737974.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"25b9bddf51911e22ad78d3aa731e4513","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/47c6c14a-bc92-4297-bec9-218553f26a0e/retrieve","id":"-1883698401"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"1352e251-7989-4647-9e0b-ca3cdf33b23f","pagecount":"44","content":"A few scattered trees can make all the difference in the Sahel, providing wood for fuel, food for people and animals, a home for beneficial insects and birds, protecting the soil from wind erosion and bringing many other benefits.T he world's climate is changing fast, and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future, no matter what measures are now taken. For agriculture, change will also be significant, as temperatures rise, rainfall patterns change and pests and diseases find new ranges, posing new risks to food and farming. Until recently, agriculture has tended to be on the sidelines of discussions concerning human-induced climate change, and has generally been seen as the 'victim'. There is now, however, a growing recognition of agriculture's contribution to climate change, past and present, and of the means by which farming systems can adapt to cope with the changes, as well as the potential of agriculture to mitigate our climate impact. This recognition has led to the concept of 'climate-smart agriculture'.The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) defines climate-smart agriculture as consisting of three main pillars: sustainably increasing agricultural productivity and incomes (food security); adapting and building resilience to climate change (adaptation); reducing and/or removing greenhouse gas emissions (mitigation), where possible.There are many projects that are testing or promoting climate-smart agriculture, but few have shown widespread uptake. This booklet showcases 16 initiatives that are having a widespread impact on food security, adaptation to climate change and climate change mitigation, covering large areas of land and improving the lives of millions of people.With examples from both the developed and developing world, the initiatives include innovative agricultural interventions (Chapter 1 in this booklet), initiatives that address climate-related risks (Chapter 2) and policies and institutions that underpin adaptation to and mitigation of climate change (Chapter 3). In some cases, particularly in the policy domain, the support for climate-smart agriculture is a side-benefit rather than the core objective of the initiative; in others, it is the main focus. But ultimately, all the cases meet the threepart goal of improving resilience to climate change, enhancing food security and livelihoods, and reducing agriculture's climate footprint.These 16 initiatives show the potential of agriculture to adapt to a changing climate, to be more resilient and protect farmers against future changes in weather patterns, pests and diseases, and to slow the rate of climate change. The challenge now is to promote widespread adoption of climate-smart agricultural interventions around the world. A recent publication 1 from the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security shows how widespread adoption might be achieved, drawing lessons from the 16 initiatives presented in this volume. n Guddi Bai Verma gathers wheat during the harvest in Madhya Pradesh, India, where agriculture has been described as a gamble on the monsoon. hile the impact of climate on agriculture has been recognised for as long as people have been farming, climate change has high lighted this dependence like never before. Temperatures are rising, rainfall is increasing in some areas and declining in others, seasonal patterns and pest and disease distribution are changing, and extreme weather events are becoming more frequent and severe.But there is now an increasing awareness of the impact that agriculture has on climate, particularly through production of methane and nitrous oxidepotent greenhouse gases. Agriculture produces nearly half of all methane generated by human activity, and nearly 60% of nitrous oxide emissions.Rather than dealing with short-term weather events-droughts, floods, heat waves and cold spells-farmers must now respond to climatic changes that will alter the way they farm irrevocably.Around the world, farmers urgently need innovations that will enable them to produce enough to support themselves and the ever-growing global population. Their added challenge is to do so in ways that will protect the environment, especially soil and water, and minimise agriculture's contribution to climate change. This section presents examples of how this is already being done. n There is growing recognition of agriculture's contribution to climate change, past and present, and of the means by which farming systems can adapt to cope with the changes, as well as the potential of agriculture to mitigate our climate impact F or centuries, farmers in the Sahel grew their crops in fields scattered with trees that were selected and nurtured. But, by the 1980s, almost all of these trees had disappeared, falling victim to drought, increasing population pressure and modern forestry and agricultural advice that dictated that trees should not be left to grow in crop fields. Farmers were told that trees on farmland were 'weeds' that competed with their crops for light, water and nutrients. This drastic loss of trees had devastating consequences. Stripped of its cover, land was exposed to sun and wind, reducing the fertility of the soil and its ability to absorb and retain water. Crops were shredded and buried by wind-blown sand. Insects and birds that used to help protect crops from pests lost their habitat and their populations declined, leading to plagues of pests and crop losses. Crop and livestock yields fell, contributing to chronic hunger and periodic acute famine. Women and children were forced to walk ever further in search of firewood, and turned to burning manure and crop residues instead, removing farmers' only source of fertiliser.Spurred by severe famine in the 1970s, development efforts targeted reforestation as a way to stop desertification and restore agricultural yields. These efforts relied on 'modern' approaches, growing seedlings of exotic species such as eucalyptus in nurseries and plan-ting them out in windbreaks and woodlots. But with little buy-in from local communities, and a national forestry policy that denied farmers ownership of trees on their land and fined them for cutting trees, few of these efforts survived when project funding ended.However, in the early 1980s, people working on a rural regeneration project in the Maradi region of Niger realised that the stumps of many indigenous trees were still present in farmers' fields and sent up shoots each year-which the farmers routinely slashed and burned. Studies showed that, far from being 'useless bushes', as had been assumed by many development practitioners, these indigenous trees could provide a wide range of goods and services, including timber, firewood, fodder, fibre, medicines, fruits, edible leaves and nuts, fodder, dyes and many environmental services.In 1984, the Maradi Integrated Development Project (MIDP) introduced 'farmer-managed natural regeneration' (FMNR), under which farmers allowed the stumps to regenerate, as part of a 'foodfor-work' programme targeting 95 villages in Niger's Maradi region. Initial results were promising, with crops growing well among the trees. But, as often happens with food-for-work programmes, when the incentive of food was withdrawn at the end of the famine, many of the farmers reverted to their normal practice and cleared the tree regrowth. Two-thirdsOver 5 million ha of degraded land in the Sahel have been restored through a practice known as 'farmer-managed natural regeneration', increasing the food security of millions of people and enhancing their resilience in the face of climate change.Firewood is an increasingly scarce and valuable commodity in the Sahel. Farmers who allow trees to regenerate on their land have a ready source of fuel for their own use and for sale, and are able to leave crop residues in the field, building up organic matter in the fragile soil.©CIFOR CHAPTER 1 / Agricultural Innovation of the half million trees that had been allowed to regenerate were cut down the following year.Those farmers who retained their trees, however, rapidly realised the benefits: more firewood, fewer pests and diseases, less soil erosion, rising water tables and higher crop yields. More wood meant that farmers were able to leave crop residues on their land, to be incorporated into the soil or grazed by livestock, thereby improving soil fertility and structure. A recent study by the World Agroforestry Centre shows that FMNR more than tripled yields of millet, from 150 kg/ha to 500 kg/ha. Overall, the changes brought about by FNMR, including improved soil fertility and increased supply of food, fodder and firewood, have been estimated to be worth at least US$56 per ha each year.More farmers quickly adopted the practice, and from those first 95 villages, FMNR has now spread across southern Niger and even into neighbouring countries, including Burkina Faso, Mali and Senegal. More than 5 million ha of land have been restored, with over 200 million trees re-established or planted. This has resulted in an additional half a million tonnes of grain production each year and enough fodder to support many more livestock. This has improved the food security of about 2.5 million people so far.The environmental impacts of FMNR are clear: the structure and fertility of the soil has improved, rain soaks into the soil more readily and water tables have risen in some places, making water more accessible available to plants and people alike. Together, these changes have increased the resilience of farming systems to extreme weather events, diversifying sources of food and income and protecting land and water resources. Anecdotal evidence suggests that FMNR also contributes to climate change mitigation, by sequestering large amounts of carbon in the soil, and in tree roots and wood. These benefits might never have been achieved, however, without the flexibility of the Maradi Forestry Department. Back in the mid-1980s, all trees in Niger were the property of the state, and farmers were fined or even imprisoned for cutting them down. Following discussions with MIDP staff, the local forestry department agreed to relax these rules, converting trees (in farmers' eyes) from a nuisance to a cash crop. Finally, in 2004, the Government of Niger changed the law, giving farmers ownership of trees on their land. The World Agroforestry Centre now estimates the value of tree products at about US$1000 per year to each household practising FMNR. n More than 5 million ha of land have been restored, with over 200 million trees reestablished or planted. This has resulted in an additional half a million tonnes of grain production each year and enough fodder to support many more livestock. It has improved the food security of about 2.5 million people so far R ice is the staple food of over half of the world's population-more than 3.5 billion people depend on rice for at least a fifth of their daily calories. More than 1 billion depend on rice farming for their livelihoods.But rice farming has some serious drawbacks. Paddy rice consumes more water than any other crop, and globally, nearly 40% of all irrigation water is used to grow rice. Globally, flooded rice fields also produce about 10% of all the methane produced by human activities, with methane 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas. Paddy fields are also a significant source of nitrous oxide, from the breakdown of excess nitrogen in the soil. Excessive use of inorganic fertilisers and agrochemicals in rice production are also responsible for environmental damage, such as pollution of water bodies.Various agronomic practices have been developed to help smallholder farmers grow more rice in a sustainable way, using less water and other inputs.Key practices include alternate wetting and drying (AWD) of the soil during grain filling rather than continuous flooding, application of organic fertilisers, such as manure, and reduced use of inorganic fertilisers and pesticides. Allowing the soil to dry out intermittently lets air in, preventing build-up of anaerobic bacteria responsible for methane production; this has been shown to reduce methane emissions from rice paddies by up to 50%. AWD also reduces the amount of water farmers have to apply to their fields by up to 40%. However, AWD may increase production of nitrous oxide, so careful fertiliser management is needed to reduce excess nitrogen in the soil and thus reduce nitrous oxide emissions. Changes in the way the crop is planted and managed-with seedlings more widely spaced in a grid pattern-allows the plants to make best use of the light, water and nutrients available to them and ensures good yields. Integrated pest management completes an environmentally friendly package.Vietnam supplies more than a fifth of the rice consumed worldwide, but millions of smallholder farmers in the country grow barely enough rice to meet their own needs.More than 9 million farmers in Vietnam own less than half a hectare of paddy rice land. Faced with the effects of climate change-declining rainfall, unpredictability of rains and salinisation of groundwater as a result of rising sea levels-and increasing H erbicide-tolerant (HT) and pest-resistant crops boost the climate resilience of farming systems and their capacity to mitigate climate change. HT crops, for example, reduce the need for ploughing and other types of mechanised weed control, reducing fuel consumption by up to 44% in maize and 60% in soybean. Both HT and pest-resistant crops reduce the amount of chemicals farmers need to apply, and the chemicals they use are less toxic than previous generations of herbicides and pesticides. Reduced tillage helps to preserve soil structure, reducing erosion and increasing infiltration and retention of water, and leads to a build-up of organic matter in the soil. Such benefits protect the environment and increase the resilience of farming systems, while also reducing the contribution of agriculture to climate change.A great advantage of HT varieties is that they facilitate weed control under reduced tillage, as they are not harmed by broad-spectrum herbicides. For example, HT canola-a variety of oilseed rape-was introduced in Canada in 1995, and now accounts for about 95% of the national crop-some 6 million ha. Grown under reduced or zero tillage, HT canola has been credited with reducing the amount of fuel used to grow the crop by over 31,000 tonnes a year, and reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 94,000 tonnes between 1996 and 2004. Adoption of reduced and zero-tillage for canola has led to the build up of organic matter in the soil, resulting in around 1 million tonnes of carbon being sequestered or no longer released into the atmosphere each year . Soil structure has also been improved, reducing vulnerability to wind and water erosion and increasing the availability of water to plants-all of which are vital for sustainable agriculture on the prairies. And beyond the environmental gains, farmers are also receiving immediate benefits in the form of higher yields, lower costs and greater returns. nAdoption of reduced and zerotillage for canola has led to the build up of organic matter in the soil, resulting in around 1 million tonnes of carbon being sequestered or no longer released into the atmosphere each year M aize is a staple food for more than 300 million people in Africa but, by the 2030s, drought and rising temperatures could render 40% of the continent's current maize-growing area unsuitable for maize varieties available today. Maize production in southern Africa, for example, may fall by 30% or more. New, drought-and heat-tolerant varieties will have to be developed quickly and be growing in farmers' fields in the next few years if we are to avoid widespread famine in Africa.Since 2006, more than 100 new, drought-tolerant maize varieties and hybrids have been developed and released across 13 countries by the Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa Initiative (DTMA), funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Howard G. Buffett Foundation, USAID and the UK Department for International Development (DFID). Each of these new varieties is adapted to local requirements, including cooking and milling properties and pest and disease resistance. In onfarm trials, the new varieties have yielded up to 35% more grain than those grown previously by farmers'; the best hybrid out-yielded even the most popular commercial variety by 26%. More than 2 million smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa are now growing these new varieties and hybrids, some of them in countries not directly involved in the DTMA-a sure sign the initiative is on the right track. Farmers are reporting yields 20-30% above what they would have got with their traditional varieties, even under moderate drought conditions. Key to the success of this initiative, which is coordinated by the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) and the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), is the way it has brought together a wide range of partners, including publicly-funded research organisations, public and private seed producers, varietal certification agencies and farmer groups. This has helped avoid the bottlenecks so common in efforts to get improved crop varieties into the hands of farmers. Farmers themselves guide the breeding efforts, making sure the varieties developed meet their requirements. Certification agencies have been engaged in the process from the beginning, so their staff are up to speed on what the initiative is trying to achieve and the new varieties can move efficiently through the certification process. Seed companies are geared up and ready to produce seed as soon as it is ready for release. Engaging the private sector has helped to ensure that farmers have access to both inputs and markets for their produce.In March 2012, DFID won the Best Technological Breakthrough award for its support of the project at the UK Climate Week Awards. nThere is not much to eat on this maize, suffering from severe drought. Climate change is increasing the risk of drought across sub-Saharan Africa, and droughttolerant maize is throwing farmers a lifeline.I n China, during the 1990s, more than a million hectares of land became eroded each year. By 2009, 38% of the country's total land area was considered badly eroded, with more than 2 billion tonnes of silt entering the Yangtze and Yellow rivers each year, two-thirds of this from farmed hillsides.China's 'Grain for Green' programme (GGP), initiated in 1999 and implemented countrywide in 2002, was designed to reduce erosion in river catchments and to alleviate poverty in poor and remote areas. Based on paying farmers not to cultivate steep slopes and to restore forests on hillsides and eroded grasslands, GGP is one of the most ambitious conservation set-aside schemes in the developing world. Farmers are supplied with tree seedlings and receive annual grain and cash payments for each hectare of set-aside land that they plant with trees. With a budget of around US$40 billion, nation-wide the scheme aimed to convert about 15 million ha of farmland into forest and grassland, and 17 million ha of eroded wasteland (grassland) into forest by 2010.The Loess Plateau, in the upper and middle reaches of the China's Yellow River, was identified as a GGP priority region. In recent years, increasing population pressure and overexploitation of the land, including overgrazing, have led to severe degradation on over 60% of the land area. The Plateau's climate is also warming and drying: between 1951 and 2008, average temperature increased by 0.02°C per year and precipitation declined by an average of 0.97 mm annually.The impact of the GGP has been considerable. Over 2.5 million households have participated, converting 2 million ha of cropped hillside to grassland or forest. In Ansai County, Shaanxi Province, for example, the forested area (both old forest and newly forested land) grew from 12.4% in 1995 to 37.7% in 2010. The new forests and grassland sequester over 700,000 tonnes of carbon (2.5 megatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents) annually across the whole Loess Plateau-equivalent to removing nearly 800,000 cars from the road. Soil erosion has been reduced by up to 26%.As a result of GGP, total grain production on the plateau was only slightly reduced, largely because the land converted to forest was marginal for cropping and yields here were low. Farmers were able to increase yields on their remaining land by concentrating their efforts and resources on these more fertile areas, boosting food security. Household income also increased, largely because farm workers were able to take up gainful off-farm employment, broadening their livelihoods base and increasing resilience. nFarmer in the Loess Plateau.Paying for ecosystem services is good for the environment and peopleT he Sahel-the belt of land that stretches across Africa below the Sahara-has always been a tough place to farm, and climate change is set to make matters worse. Rainfall is sparse and intermittent, and droughts are frequent. When rain does fall, it is usually in short, intense downpours. After the long dry season, the hard-baked surface of the soil is largely impermeable, and the rain runs off to be carried away in streams and rivers, along with valuable topsoil. As a result, both people and plants are deprived of the water they need.Constructing stone bunds along contours has proved to be an effective way of reducing runoff. These loose 'walls', 20-30 cm tall and spaced 20-50 metres apart, slow the runoff, allowing more of the water to soak into the soil and trapping silt and organic matter that would otherwise have washed away. Combined with other changes in land management, such as digging zai pits-shallow bowls filled with compost or manure in which crops are planted-the bunds markedly increase cereal yields. Sorghum and millet yields of more than 1 t/ha have been reported, double the yield achieved on unimproved land. The benefits of contour bunds should also be futureproof: if the climate becomes wetter, the bunds will alleviate runoff erosion, and if it becomes drier they will contribute to water harvesting.Contour bunds have been established on some 200,000 to 300,000 ha of land across the Sahel. Assuming a yield increase of 400 kg/ha, this implies 80,000 to 120,000 tonnes more cereal grain being produced each year, enough to feed 500,000 to 750,000 people.Tree cover and diversity have also increased on the rehabilitated areas, increasing the supply of fuelwood. As a result, more manure is being applied to fields instead of being used as fuel, further increasing soil fertility and crop yields. Groundwater levels are rising, and farmers have started growing vegetables on small plots near wells, thereby increasing both their income and the diversity of their diets. Health benefits from this are likely to be significant, although have yet to be measured.The primary constraint to widespread adoption of stone bunds is their high initial cost: constructing the bunds on a single hectare requires 30 to 50 tonnes of stone at a cost of around US$200 and up to 150 person-days of labour. Farmers therefore require external support-from government, extension services or non-governmental organizations-to take on such projects, even if the longterm benefits make them financially attractive. n © TREEAIDMillet Zai pit : farmers in the Sahel traditionally plant sorghum and millet in zai pits-shallow pits that are filled with compost and manure-that concentrate nutrients and rainfall. These work well in combination with contour bunds.Story 6 500,000 to 750,000 people are fed with yields increasing thanks to contour bundsA griculture will always be largely at the mercy of the climate. Too much rain, too little rain, or simply rain at the wrong time can devastate a farmer's crop. An intense downpour may wash away newly planted seed, leaving the farmer with the prospect of no crop or the expense of replanting. Warm, humid spells increase the danger from fungal diseases, and such weatherinflicted losses are not only experienced in the developing world. Droughts in the USA's Corn Belt in 2012 caused US$20 billion of damage to crops. In early 2013, freezing temperatures and snow in the UK killed tens of thousands of lambs across the country, driving many farmers to the brink of bankruptcy. What's more, the frequency and severity of such extreme weather events, along with changes in seasonal patterns and distributions of pests and diseases, are predicted to increase in future years.Faced with these seemingly endless risks posed by the weather, resource-poor smallholder farmers are reluctant to gamble on investing in inputs such as improved seeds and fertiliser. In a good season, these could boost their yields and bring them extra food and income. But a hail storm, drought or disease outbreak could wipe out their crops or livestock, leaving them with nothing to eat, a large debt to repay, and no way of rebuilding their livelihoods.Farmers in the developed world have long had access to safety nets and insurance that helps them survive tough times. Now, innovative approaches are being tested throughout the developing world. Examples found in this chapter include a programme in Ethiopia that is helping resource-poor farmers to rebuild their resources and boost their food security, and a weather-based insurance scheme in India that is encouraging smallholder farmers to take judicious risks to raise their production. Ultimately, such systems are helping farmers move to new production systems that can meet the demands imposed by future climate scenarios. nInsurance policies have the potential to markedly increase food production by reducing the risk farmers face from investing in inputs such as improved seeds and fertiliser. With climate change, insurance is also invaluable in protecting the food security of farming families A farmer looks towards the sky while standing amongst his drought-stricken crop.S mall-scale farmers, especially poor subsistence farmers, are loath to take risks: they cannot afford to. If a gamble does not pay off-and, in the context of uncertain physical and financial climates, investing in improved seeds, fertilisers and other inputs is a gamble-their lives and those of their families are at risk. This is one reason why smallholder farmers are often trapped in poverty-they do not have the resources to invest in the inputs that would help boost their yields and give them a surplus for sale. And unfortunately, climate change is only increasing the levels of risk for those who choose to gamble.Over two-thirds of agricultural land in India is rainfed and, as a result of climate change, droughts are increasingly frequent. The major river valleys in the north of the country-the Ganges-Brahmaputra and Indus river systems-have always been prone to flooding, but the area of land affected by floods has more than doubled in recent decades, from 19 million ha in the 1950s to 40 million ha in 2003. Between 1801 and 2002, India suffered from 42 serious droughts that reduced agricultural production. In early 2013, parts of western India were suffering from the worst drought in more than 40 years. Indian agriculture has been described as 'a gamble on the monsoon.' India has a long history of agricultural insurance schemes, starting with a pilot programme for cotton farmers in Gujarat in 1972. This led to the Comprehensive Crop Insurance scheme in 1985, which was subsequently replaced by the National Agricultural Insurance Scheme (NAIS) in 1999. NAIS is based on an 'area yield index': yields are independently checked each year on a sample of farms within a sub-district and farmers receive a pay-out if the yield falls below a certain percentage of the long-term, average yield for the area. The scheme works reasonably well for widespread events such as drought and is relatively cheap to run, as yields do not have to be checked on each farm. However, payouts tend to be delayed, taking up to 2 years to reach affected farmers.Introduced as a pilot in 2003, the Weather-Based Crop Insurance Scheme (WBCIS) was adopted by the government in 2007 as an alternative to the existing 'yield index' insurance. The weather index includes rainfall (high or low, length of wet or dry periods etc.), temperature, humidity, wind speed, and a combination of these as a proxy for disease risk, and is based on measurements taken at official weather stations around the country. Pay-outs are triggered automatically without the need for farmers to formally file a claim, reducing transaction costs andWeather-index-based crop insurance is encouraging farmers in India to invest in their crops, boosting food security and the resilience of smallholder production systems.Story 7resulting in rapid pay-outs, usually within 30 days of the index trigger. The system also has the advantage of avoiding fraudulent claims by those insured.All farmers who borrow money from financial institutions are required to take out insurance (including NAIS or WBCIS), while those who do not take out loans are still able to insure their crops if they wish to. Story 8 E thiopia's millions of smallholder farmerswho account for some three-quarters of the country's population-largely practise low-input, low-output, rainfed, subsistence agriculture. As a result they are vulnerable to the vagaries of the weather in the short term and will be hard hit by climate change in the longer term.Ethiopia has a long history of droughts and famines, but they are becoming more frequent. Throughout much of the twentieth century, the country suffered from droughts that caused widespread food shortages about once every 10 years, but such droughts are now occurring every three years or so, and almost constantly in the southern Borana rangelands. Average temperatures in the Horn of Africa increased by 1.3°C between 1960 and 2006.The increasing frequency of drought has depleted the asset base of smallholder farmers. They and their families commonly go hungry for several months even in 'normal' years, and famine is just one failed rainy season away. And every time the rains fail or crop yields are low, they are forced to sell off their livestock, ploughs, tools, and even their seeds, just to make ends meet.In 2005, the Ethiopian government introduced the Productive Safety Net Programme (PSNP) to improve the food security of people who suffer from chronic food shortages and live in areas that are prone to drought. The programme is almost fully funded by external donors, including Canada, Denmark, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden, UK, USA, EU, the World Bank and the World Food Programme. However, the Ethiopian Government is the driving force behind the programme and has had strong ownership of it from the beginning.Households that have experienced food shortages for at least three months each year in the previous three years and have no external social supportrelatives working in towns and cities who send remittances, for example-receive payments in cash, food or a mix of the two in exchange for six months' work on public works projects. Households that cannot provide labour, such as those headed by disabled or elderly people, receive the payments as grants. About 85% of beneficiaries are engaged in 'workfare' projects. These are chosen through a participatory approach based on local authority development plans and include such things as enclosing protected areas, esta-Ethiopia's Productive Safety Net Programme and Household Asset Building Programme have improved the food security and resilience to climate change of nearly 8 million households across the country.The Household Asset Building Programme in Ethiopia is helping farmers invest in increasing their agricultural production.Ethiopia's Productive Safety Net Programme means that many farmers no longer have to sell off their productive assets, such as their livestock, when drought or other calamities hit. The programme provides cash or food in exchange for work on public works projects.blishing woodlots, constructing hillside terraces, shallow wells and ponds, and diverting streams for irrigation.A complementary programme, the Household Asset Building Programme (HABP), has provided access to agricultural credit and similar services to help people build up their productive assets and increase their agricultural production. Households' food situation is monitored regularly and, once they are deemed to have achieved an acceptable level of food security and no longer need external support, they 'graduate' from the PSNP. Between 2008 and 2012, almost 500,000 households graduated from the programme.In 2012, the programme was supporting nearly 8 million people (9% of the country's population) across seven of the country's 10 regions. A study published in 2011 showed that the PSNP reduced the 'hunger gap'-the period during which households ran short of food-in beneficiary households by just over a month (29%) and improved child nutrition . The HABP reduced the hunger gap by an additional 17 days. Households enrolled in the programme showed a steady increase in livestock holdings (up 11% between 2006 and 2010) and the value of tools-hoes, sickles and ploughs-they owned. In contrast, households not enrolled in the programme saw their livestock holdings and assets fluctuate widely over the same period. Distress sales-selling off livestock and productive assets to meet immediate needs-also declined markedly, from 51% of households at the beginning of the programme to 34% of households reporting distress sales in 2010.There were strong synergies between the PSNP and HABP. Households enrolled in both programmes were 19 percentage points more likely to use fertiliser on their crops than households enrolled in only the PSNP, and 21 percentage points more likely to use fertiliser than households that were not enrolled in either programme. Similarly, households enrolled in both programmes were more likely to invest in stone terracing, which improves productivity by conserving topsoil. As a result of such measures, those enrolled in both programmes produced 147 kg more grain per household than those enrolled only in the PSNP.Working together, the PSNP and the HABP have improved the immediate food security of households, strengthened their resilience to shocks such as droughts and floods, and increased their ability to adapt to longer-term climate change. There is anecdotal evidence that the PSNP and the HABP have increased tree planting by beneficiaries and suggestions that agricultural practices adopted are likely to increase carbon sequestration, but these have not been measured or even estimated. nThe Productive Safety Net Programme improves the food security of people who suffer from chronic food shortages and live in areas that are prone to drought. It reduced the 'hunger gap' -the period during which households ran short of food -in beneficiary households by just over a month and improved child nutrition N early 70 years ago, All India Radio started broadcasting a farmers' weather bulletin. These bulletins and the subsequent TV show, Krishi Darshan, played a vital part in promoting the uptake of improved production technologies by smallholder farmers and enabling them to respond to demands imposed by the weather.Such advisory services have come a long way. The latest iteration, the Integrated Agro-Meteorological Advisory Service (IAAS) was introduced in 2007. The service involves a wide range of partners, including the India Meteorological Department (IMD), the National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (NCMRWF), the Indian Council for Agricultural Research (ICAR), state departments of agriculture and agricultural universities, several government ministries, media organisations, nongovernmental organisations and private sector bodies.The meteorological services provide weather data and five-day forecasts. Specialists from ICAR, state departments of agriculture and the universities translate these into agricultural advisories, to alert farmers to weather-related events that are likely to affect their agricultural operations, such as strong winds, low temperatures or periods of humid weather, which can increase the risk of disease outbreaks. They also provide advice on what actions farmers should take. Field units at the agricultural universities relay these advisories to farmers in local languages using a variety of channels, including SMS messages on mobile phones, local radio and newspapers, and face-to-face advisory and extension services.The IAAS also provides national-level and state-level advisory bulletins, used for planning by national and state governments and the agro-input supply industry.The agricultural advisories currently reach some 2.5 million smallholder farmers across India. Studies have shown that farmers receiving IAAS advisories have yields that are 10-15% higher, and costs that are 2-5% lower, than farmers not receiving the advisories, largely as a result of using more modern agricultural production technologies and practices, having better irrigation and pest/disease management and improved postharvest technologies. Since it started in 2007, the service has had an estimated economic impact of more than US$10 billion.The IAAS has clearly helped farmers cope with current, short-term climate-induced risk, but may do little to help them adapt to longer-term climate change. More will need to be done, to build on the foundation of farmer engagement and to help farmers make the changes necessary to cope with uncertain future climate scenarios. n Often, this proves to be because the policy environment does not encourage farmers to take up these interventions, or institutions such as land or tree tenure mean that farmers would not reap the gains from their labours. Inappropriate policies and weak institutions may result in farmers adopting practices that are unsustainable or actively degrade the environment. Resource-poor smallholder farmers live a hand-to-mouth existence. They typically lack the resources to invest in potentially life-changing interventions-even simple ones like improved seeds, fertiliser, pesticides, herbicides or improved livestock-or are reluctant to do so because of the risks to their lives and livelihoods if their crops fail or their livestock die.The difficulties facing farmers are being compounded by climate change. Extremes of weather are increasingly common, making farming a more and more risky business in the immediate term. But in the longer term, farmers will have to make major changes to the way they farm, and even what crops and livestock they keep, if they are to continue to derive their livelihoods from the land in a sustainable way.This section highlights policy approaches from around the world that are helping farmers adapt to climate change, reduce some of its impacts and contribute to its mitigation while boosting their income and protecting their livelihoods. nThe impact of agriculture on the environment is unquestionable. It is responsible for up to 25% of all greenhouse gas emissions. Policies must be implemented worldwide to help mitigate climate change and raise farmer incomes A griculture is responsible for up to a quarter of all greenhouse gas emissions worldwide, and Denmark' agricultural sector is no exception. Denmark is one of the world's most intensively farmed countries and a leading exporter of pig and dairy products. Denmark's agricultural sector is the country's third largest source of greenhouse gas emissions after the energy and transport sectors, contributing 17% of emissions.Agricultural production in Denmark is based on intensive, specialised farms, with large-scale pig, poultry, beef and dairy units and arable farms common across the country. Such intensive agriculture places considerable demands on the environment, and Denmark has a long history of efforts to reduce the environmental impact of agriculture. In 1989, for example, the government introduced the Action Programme for Joint Biogas Plants, which explored the use of liquid manure in large-scale biogas plants as a way to reduce emissions and improve manure management in the country's intensive livestock industries. The programme was backed up by action plans to reduce agricultural contamination of water courses. The Action Plan for Sustainable Agriculture, launched in 1991, tightened controls on the use of manure on farmland, and was followed by a further action plan in 2001, to improve manure handling and reduce the amount of ammonia released into the atmosphere.All of these measures were aimed at reducing the impact of agriculture on the environment, including nitrogen pollution of groundwater and release of greenhouse gases-methane and nitrous oxide in particular-to the atmosphere.The Agreement on Green Growth, signed by all of Denmark's major political parties in 2009, builds on these measures and aims to ensure that protection of the environment and the climate goes hand-in-hand with modern and competitive agriculture and food industries. The Agreement includes measures to promote organic farming, re-establish wetlands, encourage environmentally sound farming practices and reduce use of pesticides and nutrients. It also focuses on efficiency in resource and energy use and the application of environmental technologies that reduce input use, energy consumption and emissions, recover valuable by-products, and minimise waste disposal problems. One of the specific aims of the Denmark's Green Growth policy has helped reduce the agriculture sector's carbon footprint while ensuring the sector remains vibrant. Smart measures, such as improved use of manure and a 40% reduction in the use of inorganic fertiliser, have contributed to a 28% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions between 1990 and 2009.Agreement is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from Danish agriculture by 800,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents per year by 2015, half of which will come from reducing the amount of nitrogen applied as manure or inorganic fertiliser.A key climate-change mitigation element of the Agreement is its target to use half of all manure produced in the country to produce biogas by 2020-a 10-fold increase from 2009 levels. Production of biogas will reduce methane emissions from manure and reduce the country's dependence on fossil fuel-both of which will help bring down Denmark's carbon footprint. The use of catch crops and establishment of perennial plants such as willow for biomass, mandated under the Agreement, will sequester considerable amounts of carbon in organic matter and woody species.With a budget of some US$2.4 billion for 2009-15, the Agreement provides funding for several initiatives that will contribute to climate-change mitigation. These include the development of common, centralised biogas plants, farm-level investments for connecting to these plants and planting of perennial energy crops, such as willow. Planting these crops has also been made tax-deductible, to encourage uptake by farmers.Such initiatives are balanced by policy measures aimed at ensuring the continued health and vi-brancy of the agricultural sector, which is a vital part of Denmark's economy, accounting for 3% of gross domestic product and employing 8.5% of the country's labour force. Many of the changes are aimed at simplifying the policy environment in which agriculture operates, in order to reduce farm overheads and increase the efficiency of production.To date, the various measures have had considerable impact: Denmark's greenhouse gas emissions declined by up to 28% between 1990 and 2009 (from 18.7 to 13.4 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents). Much of this decline came from a 31% reduction in nitrous oxide emissions, due to improved use of manure and a 40% reduction in use of inorganic fertiliser between 1990 and 2000. Studies suggest that greenhouse gas emissions from Danish agriculture could be cut by a further 50-70% without reducing food production, and that increases in biogas production from manure could result in a positive energy balance for the agricultural sector as a whole. nThe Agreement on Green Growth, signed by all of Denmark's major political parties in 2009, aims to ensure that protection of the environment and the climate goes hand-in-hand with modern and competitive agriculture and food industriesA n initiative launched by the Australian Government in December 2011 to generate carbon credits for trading or to satisfy mandatory or voluntary carbon commitments is already showing benefits in terms of climate change mitigation and raising farmer incomes.The Carbon Farming Initiative (CFI) allows farmers to earn 'carbon credits' by implementing practices that sequester carbon or reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The credits may then be sold by farmers to individuals and businesses that want or need to offset the greenhouse gas emissions of their business operations, creating additional income for Australian farmers and land managers and boosting resilience of Australian agriculture to climate change.Eligible activities for reducing emissions include altered livestock management, increasing fertiliser use efficiency and improved savannah fire management. Activities to increase carbon sequestration include managing for increased soil carbon and reforestation and revegetation. Such sequestration activities must demonstrate that they will deliver genuine and lasting reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.To be eligible to participate in the CFI, farmer projects have to meet a number of criteria, including applying a government-approved methodology for implementing and monitoring specific carbon farming activities and generating carbon credits. So far, four methodologies have been approved, covering environmental planting of native species, burning savannah in the early dry season, destruction of methane generated from manure in piggeries, and capture and combustion of landfill gas. New methodologies are being developed by private bodies, industry associations and the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency.By July 2013, 69 projects had been declared as eligible under the CFI, including 10 related to early burning of savannah to reduce carbon emissions, 10 involving reforestation and afforestation and three reducing methane emissions from manure from piggeries.Benefits to the farms can be impressive. A pig farm in New South Wales that invested in a biogas generator went from paying US$15,000 a month for electricity to earning US$5,000 a month from the surplus electricity generated. The farm is burning some 2400 cubic metres of methane every day, saving the equivalent of 32 tonnes of carbon dioxide. At A$15 (US$13.80) per tonne, the carbon credits the biogas digester is generating are expected to be worth around US$160,000 a year.One possible drawback of the scheme, however, is that the high up-front costs of getting a project approved may discourage smallholders from getting involved, as the pay-back from small-scale operations may be too small to justify the investment; smallholders account for 86% of agricultural and forestry businesses in Australia. n Australia's Carbon Farming Initiative allows farmers to earn carbon credits for changes in land management that sequester carbon or reduce emissions, such as improved pasture management.Story 11T he Government of Brazil has introduced a US$1.6 billion fund to encourage farmers to introduce climate-smart agricultural practices that will boost production and reduce the country's greenhouse gas emissions.As in many developing countries, agriculture in Brazil is the second largest source of greenhouse gases after the energy sector. But there are clear opportunities in the country to mitigate agriculture's contribution to climate change. For example, Brazil has about 40 million has of degraded pasture. Restoring these pastures could increase beef yields six-fold, from around 30 kg/ha per year to 180 kg/ ha, reducing the pressure to expand agriculture into the Amazon region. Well-managed pasture also sequesters more carbon than degraded pasture.In 2010, the government initiated the Low-Carbon Agriculture (ABC) Plan, which aims to promote sustainable agricultural systems and practices to reduce greenhouse gas emissions but also increase the efficiency of agricultural activities and boost the resilience of rural communities. The Plan's credit arm, the ABC Programme, provides low-interest loans for sustainable agricultural practices such as: no-till agriculture; restoration of degraded pasture; integration of crops, livestock and forest; planting of commercial forests; biological nitrogen fixation; and treatment of animal wastes.The goals are ambitious, including rehabilitating 15 million ha of degraded pastures and increasing the area under zero-tillage from 25 million ha to 33 million has by 2020. The target is to reduce Brazil's direct farm carbon dioxide emissions by more than 160 million tonnes a year, and save as much again by curbing the invasion of rainforests by farmers. Initial uptake was slow, with only five projects totalling US$1.7 million approved in the first year, but over 2,000 projects were approved in 2011/12 with a total value of US$251 million-still way short of the US$1.6 billion target. Uptake has been constrained by a number of factors, including shortage of people able to evaluate proposals, both among producers and at the banks, lack of information about the technical and financial performance of some proposed interventions, and excessive bureaucracy. The government is working to reduce the red-tape, including relaxing some of the environmental controls, but it is too soon to tell if the initiative will achieve its ambitious goals. n ©Eduardo Martino/Panos/Hollandse Hoogte The most dramatic way to see the extent of deforestation in the Amazon rainforest is from the air.Persuading Brazil's farmers to adopt low-carbon agriculturex 6The Brazilian Government launched a plan to promote sustainable agricultural systems and practices to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, increase the efficiency of agricultural activities and boost the resilience of rural communities I n November 2010, the Kenya Agricultural Carbon Project (KACP) became the first soil carbon project in Africa to sign an Emissions Reduction Purchase Agreement (ERPA) with the World Bank's BioCarbon Fund.The project is operating in the Kisumu and Kitale districts of Western Kenya, which are dominated by subsistence farms with an average of less than one hectare of highly degraded land. Implemented by Vi Agroforestry, a Swedish non-governmental organisation, the project is helping these farmers adopt sustainable agricultural land management (SALM) practices, such as reduced tillage, use of cover crops and green manure, mulching, targeted application of fertilisers and agroforestry. The project is following the World Bank's ' Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Land Management' methodology, which uses land management practices as a proxy for carbon stock changes. A survey of agricultural practices at the start of the project provides the baseline against which adoption of SALM practices is monitored.A key feature of the World Bank methodology is the bottom-up approach to monitoring (with farmer groups directly engaged in monitoring of the adopted activities), which helps boost awareness and understanding of the practices among participating farmers and promotes buy-in. A sample of participating farmers completes an Activity Baseline and Monitoring Survey each month, and these are independently audited to estimate the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Vi Agroforestry then sells the greenhouse gas gains to the BioCarbon Fund. The revenue from carbon credits is distributed between farmer groups (60%), Vi Agroforestry extension operations in the project area (30%) and Vi Agroforestry headquarters in Stockholm to cover administrative costs (10%).To date, some 15,000 farmers in 800 farmer groups have adopted SALM practices, which have been applied to around 12,000 ha of degraded land. The project's target is to enrol a total of 60,000 farmers and apply SALM practices on around 45,000 ha by 2016. Vi Agroforestry estimates that this would result in reducing greenhouse gas emissions by over 60,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents each year, while also restoring degraded land, boosting crop yields and reducing the vulnerability of the farmers to the effects of climate change. According to the World Bank, the project will bring direct benefits of US$350,000 to local communities. Payments from the BioCarbon Fund will provide additional income to participating farmers until 2025. n Farmers participating in the Kenya Agricultural Carbon Project are earning carbon credits for implementing land management practices such as mulching that reduce carbon emissions while at the same time boosting crop and livestock production. of two-thirds of Niger's local governments to design and implement development plans using small capital grants. In this locally owned process, villagers agree on a list of projects to be implemented, with backstopping from local technical experts from decentralised offices of national ministries. While many of the projects have focused on health and education, the programme has also financed more than 1,000 income-generating micro-projects in agriculture, fisheries and livestock, which have benefited an estimated 100,000 people, 80% of whom are women. More sustainable land mana-gement practices have been implemented on nearly 9,000 ha, increasing agricultural productivity, vegetative cover and carbon sequestration and reducing water erosion on 88% of sites. Now, the Community Action Project for Climate Resilience (CAPCR)-part of the government' Strategic Programme for Climate Resilience-is building on CAP, focusing on making sure that climate resilience is incorporated into development programmes and investment plans across the economy and improving the resilience of agricultural, agroforestry, agropastoral and pastoral production systems to climate change. There are already many good practices in sustainable land and water management known in West Africa, such as soil/moisture conservation methods, water harvesting, reduced tillage, agroforestry and nutrient-enhancing rotation systems, and the project will support initiatives to roll these out across the country. The project will also support social protection measures, such as cash transfers, seasonal labour-intensive public works programmes and safety nets for the most vulnerable households.It is too early to say how much impact these programmes will have on climate-change mitigation or resilience, but the bottom-up approach augurs well for both sustainability and beneficiary buy-in. n The objective of the original Plan Maroc Vert was to revitalise and reform Morocco's agriculture and transform it into a driving force for broadbased economic and social growth in rural areas. The targets are ambitious: increase production of olives four-fold; more than double citrus production; double or treble the income of 3 million rural workers; and create 1.5 million new, permanent jobs in the agricultural sector. The plan has two pillars, one focused on promoting modern, competitive, market-oriented agriculture, the second dedicated to combating rural poverty by increasing the agricultural incomes of the most vulnerable farmers in marginal areas. The measures proposed could reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 63.5 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents over 20 years, largely though sequestration of carbon in the soil as a result of improved agronomic practices.So far, the Plan has delivered impressive results. By 2011, production of olives had nearly tripled relative to 2005-07, citrus production was up 20%, cereal production was up 52%, date production up 45%, and red meat production was up 48%. F orests play a vital role in the livelihoods of millions of Tanzanians, but uncontrolled exploitation of the country's forests in the 1990s and early 2000s led to over 400,000 ha of forest being lost each year.Tanzanian authorities recognised that they did not have the resources-money or people-to protect all the country's forests. Villagers were using the forests as an open access resource, indiscriminately gathering fuelwood, forest fruits and vegetables, medicinal plants and building materials for their own use, and cutting trees for timber or to make charcoal for sale.Participatory forest management (PFM) was seen as a way of getting local people to take responsibility for managing the forests themselves. The Forest Policy of 1998 and the Forest Act of 2002 provided a legal basis for communities to own and manage forest resources on village lands and jointly manage forest resources in government forest reserves.By the end of 2011, more than 2 million ha of forest were under community-based management and more than 1.6 million ha were under joint management, involving over 1,800 villages-17.5% of all the villages in the country. The impact on deforestation and forest degradation is promising. The size and volume of trees are increasing in forests under PFM, but are continuing to decline elsewhere; cutting of poles and timber harvesting are lower in the PFM forests than in traditionally managed forests. However, there is some evidence that villagers are harvesting wood from other, non-protected areas, so the overall impact on deforestation may not be as great as hoped for. The impact on livelihoods is also mixed, with community-based forests contributing more to livelihoods than the jointly managed forests, with their more-restrictive protection rules. ","tokenCount":"8891"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1201410693.json b/data/part_2/1201410693.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7ba5452b416fe906ec34b9dbc4804fd5aabeb261 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1201410693.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b4f87906ddb394f7d1112ab2f76dcafb","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e85d48d3-5a14-4ece-a564-e3b8ed1695b3/retrieve","id":"-1158722877"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"7a92f8c4-27db-4525-8efd-89feea25d4d9","pagecount":"2","content":"Sustained adoption of animal traction for crop cultivation in the semiarid zone of West Africa has been slow despite deliberate attempts by governments, development agencies and research organisations to promote its use among smallscale farmers. The low adoption rates are partly due to demand and supply constraints, combined with the absence of certain preconditions (e.g. appropriate climatic and biophysical attributes, and farming practices). On the demand side, factors like the short time available for land preparation and sowing, high opportunity cost of resources tied up in animal traction, variable yield gains from animal traction tillage and long learning curves for both animals and operators have contributed to limit the adoption of animal traction. On the supply side, inappropriately designed and expensive equipment, and inadequate extension, training and support services have inhibited adoption of animal traction. Together, these demand and supply factors have lowered the profitability of animal traction and made its use unattractive to the farmer in semiarid West Africa.For policy makers and researchers in West Africa, the issue of how to improve the adoption, utilisation and profitability of animal traction remains an important one. This is all the more so given that animal traction has not been fully exploited in many parts of semiarid West Africa and that its use has seldom led to the achievement of the many benefits documented for other regions of the world, particularly Asia. Factors responsible for the divergence between the potential and actual impact of animal traction, and measures to narrow the gap need therefore to be identified more clearly through empirically based research.Survey data collected in 1991 and 1992 in two villages situated in the Sahelian (dry) and Sudanian (wet) agroclimatic zones of Niger serve to demonstrate the regional diversity in patterns and intensity of animal traction utilisation, and potential gains associated with it.Production function estimates showed that the use of animal traction did not have any significant impact on area cultivated, but increased yields of sorghum and maize by 12-15%. At the same time, it increased labour input by 15 manhours/ha in the Sahelian agroclimatic zone, but reduced it by 50 manhours/ha in the wet zone. These differences in labour use per hectare in the two villages were due to the differential uses of animal traction in the dry and wet zones. In the dry zone, animal traction increases labour requirements because it is mainly used for ploughing which adds an extra task to the cultivation process. In the wet zone, the higher degree of animal traction utilisation, particularly for weeding (in addition to ploughing), results in labour savings that offset the increase in labour input incurred in ploughing early in the season.Multiyear partial budget streams estimated under three different scenarios also showed that rates of return on animal traction investment ranged form -4% to 18% in the dry zone and from 14% to 58% in the wet zone. The analysis indicates that benefits other than area expansion and cultivation of cash crops played a minor role in the profitability of animal traction, particularly in the wet zone. Overall, the profitability of animal traction under existing farm conditions in the study villages appears limited.The evidence presented for Niger indicates that there exists a wide regional variation in the potential for adoption and efficient utilisation of animal traction depending on a broad range of agroecological and economic factors. This point has generally been overlooked in previous attempts by governments and non governmental organisations to promote the use of animal traction in Niger and other parts of semiarid West Africa.While simple mantoland ratios suggest that there is ample land for expansion in villages of the Sahelian zone, the low and variable rainfall creates a short growing season. This implies a need for early planting with minimum land preparation at the onset of the rains. The extremely poor soil fertility and the limited range of crops that can be grown strictly limit potential utilisation and profitability of animal traction in the dry zone. Some limited success in maintaining animal traction in this zone could, however, be achieved by using it mainly for weeding and by easing farmers' access to inorganic fertilisers.In the relatively better endowed Sudanian zone where the growing season is longer, soils more fertile and crops more diverse the potential for profitable use of animal traction is higher. However, realising the potential benefits will depend on using animal traction on a wide range of farm tillage operations (e.g. ploughing, planting and weeding), on a sufficiently large farm area and on highvalue crops (e.g. cowpea and groundnut). Since animal traction as currently utilised in the wet zone is not sufficiently profitable, changes in existing farm practices and increased intensity of animal traction equipment use should raise the economic returns to animal traction to an acceptable level.An option not considered in this study is the use of donkey traction which could be promoted together with changes in cropping patterns, particularly in the wet zone where the potential exists for profitable use of animal traction.For more information on this issue see: Williams T.O. 1997. Problems and prospects in the utilization of animal traction in semiarid West Africa: Evidence from Niger. ","tokenCount":"855"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1203042323.json b/data/part_2/1203042323.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aa0f5b7fc8065486d936992e676e61441254599b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1203042323.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"45e9d0b6124b0e3398328eeed23579a8","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/fef3cbe3-692a-45f2-a9d2-ba50cdf31159/retrieve","id":"1451458661"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"93b71816-8010-44b3-91ce-ee2aa68b444e","pagecount":"97","content":"Tabla 1: Características generales de tipologías de finca por zona ganadera ..En el marco del \"Estudio de apoyo a la preparación del portafolio de inversiones para el desarrollo de la ganadería baja en carbono de Nicaragua\", se estableció una tipología de fincas basada en los siguientes criterios:• Agrupamiento de la producción ganadera en cinco zonas, basada en criterios geográficos y de clima (Nueva Frontera Agrícola, Vía Láctea Ampliada, Zona de Transición, Zona del Pacífico, Zona Seca). Para una descripción detallada de las zonas favor ver el documento \"Análisis de los datos macros a nivel de región para preparación de un plan de inversiones para la producción ganadera baja en carbono de Nicaragua\". • Definición de cinco sistemas productivos con base en la escala de producción y propósitos de productivos de la explotación ganadera:• Micro Ganaderos de Subsistencia: Son productores que mantienen pocas vacas en ordeño y producen diariamente pequeñas cantidades de leche durante determinados meses en el año exclusivamente para consumo familiar. Son productores con sistemas de producción mixtos (agricultura y ganadería), limitado acceso a tierra por lo cual el área para producción de forrajes es escaza y les obliga a buscar diferentes estrategias como alquiler de potreros, pastoreo en caminos y pastoreo en áreas de producción agrícola en épocas que no están cultivadas, lo que enmascara el alto índice de carga animal por unidad de superficie de pastos que se registra en este tipo de fincas. Su capacidad de inversión y capital de trabajo para ganadería son casi nulas, lo que limita su capacidad para realizar innovaciones y las prácticas se limitan a aquellas basadas en uso intensivo de mano de obra familiar.• Mini y Pequeños Ganaderos, productores de Leche y crianza de terneros menores de 1 año: Son productores cuya finalidad productiva es la producción de leche para consumo familiar y venta de excedentes, como alternativa de mejora de ingresos y para el flujo diario de caja. Debido a limitaciones de tierra, venden los terneros después del destete o a más tardar cuando tienen un año de edad, y las terneras las dejan en la finca como futuras productoras. La denominación mini y pequeños depende de la cantidad de vacas en ordeño, normalmente los pequeños ganaderos poseen entre 5 y 10 vacas en ordeño, y los mini ganaderos entre 3 y 5 vacas en ordeño. Cuentan con un poco más de capital de trabajo que el tipo anterior, lo que le permite realizar pequeñas inversiones en mano de obra temporal e innovaciones no muy intensivas en capital. Cuenta con mejores condiciones de acceso a servicios y mercados que los micro ganaderos. • Medianos ganaderos, productores de leche y crianza de terneros menores de 1 año:Similares a la tipología anterior, el fin productivo es la producción de leche para consumo familiar y venta de excedentes, como alternativa de mejora de ingresos y para el flujo diario de caja; y debido a limitaciones de tierra, venden los terneros después del destete o a más tardar cuando tienen un año de edad, y las terneras las dejan en la finca como futuras productoras. La escala de producción refiere a fincas en el estrato de tamaño entre 50 y 100 Mz, principalmente en las zonas Seca y Pacífico, con un promedio de 10 vacas en ordeño. La mano de obra utilizada para las operaciones ganaderas es mayormente familiar y contrata trabajadores temporales para las labores de limpieza de potreros y mantenimiento de cercas; cuenta con mayores oportunidades de acceso a servicios financieros con créditos de bajos montos, servicio de asistencia técnica y acceso a mercados. Realiza mayores inversiones en innovaciones basadas tanto en uso de capital y uso intensivo de mano de obra familiar y contratada, lo que permite realizar un mejor cuido del ganado • Medianos ganaderos, productores de leche y crianza terneros menores 18 meses.Producción de leche a mayor escala, poseen en promedio 17 vacas en ordeño (rango entre 15 y 18) en las zonas subhúmeda y seca, y promedio de 24 vacas en ordeño (rango entre 23 y 25) en las zonas húmedas y muy húmedas (NFA y VLA). Gracias a la mayor disponibilidad de tierra (fincas en el estrato de 100 a 200 Mz en todas las zonas), retienen los terneros 10 a 20 meses más después del destete, para obtener mayores ingresos por la venta de los mismos. Cuenta con mayor acceso a servicios de financiamiento y asistencia técnica, mano de obra familiar y mayor capacidad de contratar trabajadores asalariados, pero el sistema de explotación tiende a ser más extensivo en el uso de tierra aprovechando la ventaja de tener mayor acceso a este recurso. También tiene mayores oportunidades para acceder a mercados más favorables. • Medianos ganaderos, productores de leche y desarrollo de terneros. Son productores que se ubican en el estrato de fincas que poseen entre 200 y 500 Mz, con un promedio de 40 vacas en ordeño (rango entre 36 y 44 vacas) en las zonas húmedas NFA y VLA, y 27 vacas en ordeño (rango entre 24 y 31) en las zonas sub húmedas, Pacífico, zona de Transición, y zona Seca. Producen leche para venta a plantas de acopio o intermediarios que se dedican al procesamiento de lácteos o venta de leche fluida a la industria láctea. Gracias a la mayor disponibilidad de tierra, retienen los terneros nacidos en su finca y compran terneros o novillos a otros productores para desarrollarlos y venderlos con un peso igual o próximo al peso ideal para sacrificio. Su acceso a servicios de asistencia técnica y financiamiento es de regular a bajo, mejores oportunidades de insertarse en mercados favorables; el sistema de explotación tiende a ser más extensivo en el uso de tierra aprovechando la ventaja de tener mayor acceso a este recurso.• Tamaño de la finca. Dependiendo de la zona ganadera, se definió entre cinco y ocho estratos de fincas basado en tamaño y sistema de producción. La Tabla 1 presenta los detalles.Para el análisis más detallado de la situación actual (\"Línea Base\") y del impacto de intervenciones (basados en un portafolio de inversiones), para cada zona ganadera se definió tres tipologías (\"pequeña\", \"mediana\", \"grande\"), basadas en las tipologías originales y la proporción que representan del total de fincas ganaderas; las tres tipologías definidas comprenden por lo menos 75% de las fincas con ganado y tienen gran potencial para aumentar productividad y mitigación de impactos ambientales y climáticos. Fuente: Censo 2011, elaboración propiaLa Tabla 2 presenta las características generales de las tres tipologías seleccionadas por zona. En general, estas tres tipologías representan el mayor porcentaje de las explotaciones ganaderas existentes en cada zona, representando en promedio el 74% en las zonas Pacífico y de Transición y el 88% en las otras tres regiones.• Predomina el uso de pasturas naturales las cuales representan en promedio el 70% de las áreas de pastoreo, lo cual incide en la baja carga animal por unidad de superficie de pastoreo y el carácter extensivo de la ganadería, asociado esto a bajos niveles de productividad. • Merece especial atención el hecho que las fincas pequeñas en todas las zonas tienden a tener una mayor proporción del área de la finca en uso con bosques, con un promedio del 43%, mientras que los otros dos tipos poseen un menor porcentaje del área de la finca en uso bajo bosques con un promedio de 22% y 8%, respectivamente para los medianos y grandes productores.Tabla 2: Características productivas de tipologías de finca por zona ganadera La Figura 1 muestra la composición promedio de la dieta diaria de los animales durante el año para las diferentes tipologías. De este gráfico puede resaltarse la alta proporción de forrajes (naturalizados) y bajo uso de suplementos en la alimentación del ganado, que refleja limitaciones en la cantidad y calidad de la dieta e inadecuada o insuficiente suplementación, con sus consecuencias productivas, económicas y ambientales. Para más detalles ver el Anexo B.Fuente: varios informes, publicaciones, grupos focales, elaboración propia Figura 1: Composición de la canasta de alimentos por tipología -línea base La Figura 2 muestra por tipología las proporciones de los diferentes tipos de pasto del área total de producción.Figura 2: Areas de diferentes tipos de pastos por tipología (Mz) -línea baseLos niveles de producción, productividad y eficiencia reproductiva en general son bajos en todas las zonas ganaderas, aunque debe señalarse las limitaciones de acceso a información pública, como el monitoreo de fincas que realiza el MAG, y la falta de uso de registros ganaderos impide determinar con mayor precisión esos indicadores para poder determinar cuáles son los principales que más afectan el desempeño de las fincas ganaderas. Los promedios de producción diaria de leche en las zonas ZT y ZS son un poco más altos que los promedios de las zonas NFA y VLA, esto se explica por una mayor disponibilidad y accesibilidad de suplementos alimenticios como melaza, semolina y pastos de corte, que permiten tener una alimentación un poco más balanceada en las primeras zonas, mientras que en las zonas NFA y VLA la alimentación es casi exclusivamente forrajes durante todo el año, con serias limitaciones tanto en cantidad como en calidad por el estado de degradación de las pasturas y manejo deficiente del pastoreo. Tabla 3 presenta los detalles. Fuente: Censo 2011, elaboración propiaLa Tabla 4 presenta los impactos ambientales, a través de los siguientes indicadores:• Balance de nitrógeno: en general la salida de nitrógeno (biomasa) exceda la entrada (estiércol) y varía entre -21 y -33 kg por ha (-14 y -22 kg por Mz). Este balance negativo es una de las causas de la degradación de las pasturas, lo cual merece una atención prioritaria buscando alternativas que contribuya a reducir o eliminar ese balance negativo con énfasis en aquellas que permitan aprovechar el ciclaje de nutrientes como especies forrajeras fijadoras de nitrógeno o con potencial de inhibir la nitrificación en el suelo, pastoreo intensivo con altas cargas en pequeñas áreas, entre otras. • Erosión: varía entre 0.3 y 1.5 toneladas de tierra por ha (0.2 y 1 t/Mz), los valores más altos en la NFA y VLA, posiblemente relacionado con una mayor erosión hídrica en pasturas con altos niveles de degradación. • Comparación entre el área para la alimentación animal (pasturas) según los datos oficiales (basados en el Censo agropecuario de 2011) y el requerimiento de tierra basado en los requerimientos de energía (Energía Metabolizable) y proteína (Proteína Cruda) de las diferentes categorías de ganado, los rendimientos de pastos y otras fuentes de alimentación en las diferentes zonas, las tasas de aprovechamiento, etc. Ver Anexo A para algunos detalles. En general, salvo en el caso de las fincas medianas en la NFA y las fincas grandes en la NFA y VLA, el área requerida es superior al área real, indicando una sobreexplotación, una causa principal de la degradación de las pasturas. • Emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero (GEI): en todos los casos superior a 4 kg de CO2 equivalentes por kg de leche. La FAO reporta un promedio 3.4 kg de CO2 equivalentes para una producción anual de 1,947 kg/vaca para Latino América y el Caribe (FAO and GDP, 2018). Esta cifra se compara bien con este análisis (promedio de 6.6 kg de CO2 equivalentes por kg de leche para una producción anual de 950 kg/vaca en sistemas extensivos con una baja productividad y una alta proporción de ganado que no produce leche). El Anexo D provee más detalles sobre las diferentes fuentes. • Las emisiones por hectárea varían entre 2.3 y 3 t (1.6 y 2.1 t/Mz); por otro lado, la captura de carbono varía mucho, y depende principalmente de la presencia de bosque secundario en la finca, observándose una tendencia a un balance positivo de carbono generado por tasas de secuestro mayores que las tasas de emisiones. • El requerimiento de agua por kg de leche varía de 2.0 a 3.7 m 3 . Este resultado concuerda con otros análisis, por ejemplo de CATIE en Jinotega y Matiguás (Ríos et al, 2013) La Tabla 5 presenta aspectos económicos. Ellos incluyen:• El valor promedio anual de la producción de leche y carne • Los costos de operaciones de la producción: manejo del ganado (mano de obra, costos sanitarios), mantenimiento de los potreros (mano de obra, algunos insumos), pastos de corte (mano de obra incluye también suministro al ganado) • El balance (valor de producción menos los costos operacionales). Cabe destacar la tendencia a obtener balances negativos para todas las tipologías en las zonas Nueva Frontera Agrícola y Zona Seca y balances modestos a bajos en el resto de las zonas, lo que está asociado con los menores valores de la producción; esto confirma la brecha de la ganadería del país en general en los niveles de productividad y eficiencia reproductiva, siendo más marcado en las dos zonas mencionadas inicialmente. • El requerimiento de la mano de obra (manejo del ganado, manejo de pasturas y forrajes): la mano de obra constituye entre 60 y 70 % de los costos operacionales. Fuente: Grupos focales, elaboración propiaBasado en los grupos focales y la consulta nacional (ver informe para más detalles) se propone las siguientes intervenciones al nivel de finca:• Sistemas silvopastoriles: aumento y rehabilitación de pastos mejorados con árboles dispersos en potreros • Aumento de bancos energéticos (pastos de corte) • Establecimiento de cercas vivas (parte de sistemas silvopastoriles) • Bancos de proteínaConsiste en el establecimiento de pastos mejorados al espeque o en surcos, en dosis y distancias de siembra que garanticen una correcta densidad o cobertura de plantas de pastos por unidad de superficie, asociado con árboles dispersos dentro del área de potreros en densidades entre 35 y 70 árboles por manzana (50 a 100 árboles por hectárea), provenientes de regeneración natural, siembra de especies leñosas multipropósitos o de la combinación de ambas estrategias de introducción de árboles en potreros. Para la escala de intervención por cada finca se considera la cantidad de animales existentes en las principales categorías productivas (vacas de ordeño, toros y hembras y machos en crecimiento 0-3 años de edad) cuantificados como Unidades Ganaderas Grandes (UGG, 1 UGG= 450 kg de PV) y se establece una relación de 2 UGG por cada manzana a intervenir con esta tecnología. Para más detalles ver el Anexo C.Consiste en el establecimiento de cultivares de gramíneas con tallos de crecimiento erecto y prominente y altos rendimientos de biomasa forrajera por unidad de superficie, sembradas en monocultivo en lotes o áreas compactas para usarlos principalmente en sistemas de corte y acarreo para suministro como forraje verde picado o para la conservación de forraje verde mediante la técnica del ensilaje para suministro en épocas críticas. Preferiblemente se utilizan especies perennes como cultivares de Cenchrus purpureus (antes Pennisetum purpureum), variedades de caña de azúcar y caña japonesa, aunque también se incluye la siembra de variedades forrajeras de maíz y sorgo. Para determinar la escala de intervención por finca se consideró la cantidad de animales existentes en las principales categorías productivas (vacas de ordeño, toros y hembras y machos en crecimiento 0-3 años de edad) cuantificados como Unidades Ganaderas Grandes (UGG, 1 UGG= 450 kg de PV), y se fijó un suministro de biomasa verde de pasto equivalente al 3% del peso vivo, como complemento diario al pastoreo durante todo el año (365 días), y luego se dividió entre el rendimiento de biomasa de pastos promedio anual por manzana estimado en dependencia de las zonas ganaderas.Consiste en el establecimiento de arbustivas forrajeras, leguminosas y no leguminosas, sembradas en monocultivo en lotes o áreas compactas para usarlos principalmente en sistemas de corte y acarreo para suministro como en forma de forraje verde picado como suplemento forrajero de alta calidad nutritiva, para mejorar suministro de proteína y energía digestible. Para determinar la escala de intervención por finca se consideró la cantidad de animales existentes en las principales categorías productivas (vacas de ordeño, toros y hembras y machos en crecimiento 0-3 años de edad) cuantificados como Unidades Ganaderas Grandes (UGG, 1 UGG= 450 kg de PV), y se fijó un suministro de biomasa verde seca de forraje equivalente al 0.75% del peso vivo, combinado con pasto de corte, como complemento diario al pastoreo durante todo el año (365 días), y luego se dividió entre el rendimiento de biomasa verde seca promedio anual por manzana estimado en dependencia de las zonas ganaderas.Esta innovación consiste en la división de pasturas en potreros de tamaño pequeño, mediante el uso de cercas eléctricas (preferiblemente) o cercas convencionales de alambre de púas. Los pequeños potreros son manejados con períodos adecuados de descanso después de un pastoreo y períodos cortos de pastoreo (preferiblemente un día) con altas cantidades de ganado, los cuales se definen con base en la biomasa de pasto disponible para asegurar mayor eficiencia en su utilización sin afectar la cantidad de forraje residual para el rebrote de los pastos. Entre los principales beneficios de esta innovación están: Aumento de la vida útil de las pasturas, la capacidad de carga animal y la productividad animal por unidad de superficie; uniformidad en el pastoreo y en la distribución del estiércol y la orina de los animales; mejora la fertilidad física, química y biológica del suelo en áreas de pastoreo y su capacidad de infiltración de agua; reducción de emisiones de carbono; reducción de costos de operación y mantenimiento de pasturas, entre otros.Para estimar la escala de intervención se consideró el área total de pastoreo en la finca; se definió una intervención hasta un máximo de 70 Mz de área total de pastoreo, con base en la capacidad máxima promedio de un sistema de cercas eléctricas con el equipamiento básico. En la implementación de este sistema de pastoreo es importante tener en cuenta la altura promedio de las plantas de pastos como criterio de decisión para la entrada y salida de pastoreo de los animales, y el uso de una carga ganadera adecuada que permita el consumo de toda la biomasa que crece entre la altura de entrada y la altura de salida después de un pastoreo. Otro elemento importante es el período de recuperación o descanso sin pastoreo que requiere un potrero para alcanzar la altura óptima de entrada para pastorearse nuevamente. En la Tabla 6 se sugieren las alturas de entrada a pastoreo y altura de salida de pastoreo y los tiempos promedios de recuperación o descanso por zonas climáticas para distintos cultivares de pastos mejorados.Tabla 6: Prácticas de pastoreo rotacional intensivo Para definir el tamaño promedio de potreros, se considera un día de pastoreo o de ocupación y debe asegurarse una oferta o asignación de forraje, en base seca, del 7% del Peso Vivo de los animales (7 kg de biomasa verde seca de forraje por cada 100 kg de PV). A manera de ejemplo, para pastorear 20 vacas (equivalentes a 20 UGG) con una asignación del 7% se debe asegurar una oferta de 450 kg biomasa verde seca de pastos; en el caso que se determine una disponibilidad o rendimiento de 20 t de materia seca/ha/año, lo que equivale a un rendimiento promedio por corte de 2.2 t MS/ha con 9 cortes en el año, tendríamos que se requiere 0.21 ha (2100 m2 equivalente a 1/3 de manzana) por cada 20 UGG que pastorean en un día.A continuación, se presentan los resultados de la modelación del efecto de las inversiones a nivel de finca hasta 2030 en algunos indicadores productivos, ambientales y económicos. Para este análisis se consideran dos escenarios: i) un crecimiento de 2% anual (Inv 2%), ocasionado por una mayor tasa de selección y extracción de hembras, tal a como han sugerido algunos especialistas nacionales con el fin de reducir costos, aumentar productividad, producción individual y eficiencia reproductiva, mediante la eliminación de hembras improductivas, o con problemas reproductivos o con bajo potencial genético de producción y reproducción, y ii) un escenario de proyección de crecimiento del hato del 5% anual (Inv 5%), similar al estimado por fuentes oficiales y especialistas nacionales para el período 2010-2020 para el que tomaron como base el hato nacional reportado en CENAGRO 2011.Con la implementación de las intervenciones tecnológicas se logra un aumento en la oferta de alimentos (forrajes y suplementos) de buena calidad. En la Figura 3 se muestra los cambios en las proporciones de pastos mejorados, pastos naturalizados y pastos de corte en el área total de producción de forraje por finca para los escenarios línea base y con inversiones. La Figura 4 muestra la participación de los diferentes forrajes y otros suplementos alimenticios en la composición de la dieta diaria de los animales, en escenarios de LB y con inversiones (Inv 5%).Además del aumento significativo en la proporción de pastos mejorados y pastos de corte, con las inversiones se alcanza a mejorar el manejo del pastoreo en el 100% de las áreas de pastos mejorados, mediante la implementación de un sistema de pastoreo rotacional intensivo (Figura 4), el cual se describió detalladamente su implementación en sección anterior de este mismo documento.Figura 3: Composición de la canasta de alimentos por tipología -con inversiones En general, el efecto esperado de las inversiones en las innovaciones propuestas, bajo ambos escenarios de crecimiento del hato, es un aumento o mejora significativa en los principales indicadores productivos y eficiencia reproductiva con respecto a la situación actual (Línea Base) (Tabla 12). Los aumentos o mejora en los principales indicadores se explican por una mejora en la composición de la dieta de los animales con un aumento considerable en el porcentaje de participación de pastos mejorados y la inclusión de otras fuentes alimenticias como pastos de corte, forrajes con mayores contenidos de proteínas (como leguminosas y otras arbustivas forrajeras) y concentrados, todo lo cual aumenta la oferta diaria de alimentos, en cantidad y calidad.El efecto será mayor en las zonas VLA y ZT en comparación con las otras tres zonas, lo cual se explica por las mejores condiciones climáticas y mayores niveles de adopción tecnológica en las primeras dos zonas. Cabe mencionar que los indicadores que se presentan en las tablas antes mencionadas son exclusivamente indicadores de desempeño individual de los animales, los cuales se consideran similares para ambos escenarios con diferentes tasas de crecimiento del hato.El porcentaje de aumento en la ganancia anual de peso es mayor para el crecimiento de los terneros menores de un año que para los novillos, lo que también se refleja en un porcentaje de aumento mayor en el indicador de peso al destete. Esto se explica por los valores actuales de ganancia diaria de peso durante el primer año de vida de los animales, los que se consideran son demasiado bajo producto de prácticas de manejo deficientes de alimentación y manejo, mientras que el valor actual de la ganancia diaria de peso en novillos después del primer año de vida tiende a ser un poco más alta, aun cuando la alimentación es insuficiente en cantidad y calidad. El aumento en las tasas de ganancias de peso en los animales en los primeros dos años de vida también tiene un efecto positivo en la edad al primer parto de las hembras, ya que se reduce el tiempo requerido para que las hembras alcancen el peso óptimo requerido para entrar a la etapa reproductiva.En el caso de la producción láctea, las inversiones aumentarán la producción anual de leche por vaca adulta en un rango promedio por zona entre 70% y 117%, producto de los aumentos que se generen en la producción diaria y estacional de leche, el período de lactancia y la tasa de parición.A nivel de zonas, los aumentos serán mayores en las zonas NFA, VLA y ZT por el efecto de las mejores condiciones de precipitación en esos territorios; mientras que a nivel de tipologías los mayores aumentos se esperan en los tipos medianos y grandes debido al mayor efecto de las innovaciones en la duración de la lactancia y la tasa de parición. Las Tablas 13 a 17 presentan los detalles por zona y tipología.Tabla 13: Productividad por zona ganadera y tipología -Nueva Frontera Agrícola En general en todas las zonas, tipologías y escenarios de crecimiento del hato, la salida de nitrógeno por hectárea excede las entradas (provenientes en mayor parte del aporte que hace el estiércol y la orina) al sistema ganadero. Este balance negativo merece una especial atención porque es una de las principales causas de la degradación de las pasturas. La cantidad de nitrógeno que sale está en relación directamente proporcional a la producción de biomasa de pastos y de follaje de especies arbustivas y arbóreas en los potreros, de allí que el balance negativo de nitrógeno es 2 a 3 veces más en los escenarios con intervenciones pastos mejorados manejados bajo sistema PRI e integración de estas intervenciones con SSP, principalmente en las zonas NFA, VLA y ZT. Esto obliga a considerar la inclusión de algunas estrategias u opciones tecnológicas de manejo de la fertilidad del suelo en pasturas que contribuyan a reducir ese desbalance de nitrógeno.El nivel de erosión del suelo en las fincas varía entre 0.7 hasta 1.5 t/ha/año, estimándose los mayores niveles para las zonas NFA y VLA, lo cual se asocia con la erosión hídrica por las mayores cantidades de precipitación a lo largo del año en ambas zonas y combinado con bajos niveles de cobertura vegetal en potreros por la degradación de pasturas y deforestación en pasturas para el escenario de línea base. Con las inversiones en tecnologías se estima una ligera reducción en este indicador, en comparación con la línea base.Con las inversiones en tecnologías los requerimientos de tierra estimados se reducen en promedio en 50% con respecto a la cantidad de tierra usada actualmente, siendo un poco mayor la reducción de tierra en el escenario con 2% de crecimiento del hato. Al comparar las zonas, el efecto de reducción del área requerida para la producción de forrajes y otros alimentos es mayor en las zonas NFA y VLA, lo cual brindará beneficios ambientales adicionales como la reducción en la expansión territorial de la ganadería, teniendo en cuenta que es en esas zonas donde se encuentran las principales reservas naturales del país.Las emisiones GEI por unidad de superficie en los sistemas de producción ganadera en el escenario línea base es en promedio 3.6, 2.1 y 1.7 t CO2-eq/ha, respectivamente para las tipologías de fincas pequeño, mediano y grande. Considerando que el mayor aporte de emisiones GEI provienen de la fermentación entérica, las variaciones entre tipologías de productores se explican por la intensidad en el uso de la tierra, lo cual es más extensivo a medida que aumenta la escala de producción. El Anexo D provee más detalles sobre las diferentes fuentes de las emisiones.Por otro lado, se estimó que los niveles de almacenamiento de carbono son mayores que las emisiones, aún en el escenario línea base, lo que genera un balance positivo en el carbono almacenado en todos los escenarios. El balance de carbono considerando solo el carbono almacenado por la implementación de SSP, a diferentes niveles o escalas de inclusión de árboles y arbustivas en el sistema ganadero, es de -2.50, -4.18, -6.34 y 0.93 t CO2-eq capturado/ha para los escenarios LB, Pasturas Mejoradas (PM), PM mas sistema de pastoreo rotacional intensivo (PRI) y PM+PRI+Sistema Silvopastoril (SSP); el mayor balance en los escenarios con SSP se deben a la mayor cantidad de carbono secuestrado tanto por las pasturas mejoradas (principalmente carbono en el suelo) como el carbono secuestrado por el componente arbóreo (se considera tanto la parte aérea como raíces), lo cual hace que el almacenamiento de carbono en el escenario que combina las tres intervenciones (PM+PRI+SSP) sea significativamente superior que en los otros escenarios analizados.El balance de carbono por unidad de superficie aumenta significativamente en todos los escenarios al incluir en las estimaciones el secuestro de carbono que hay en las áreas de bosques secundarios que se mantienen en las fincas ganaderas. El bosque secundario secuestra en promedio 6 t CO2-eq por ha.Otro de los indicadores ambientales de importancia se refiere al consumo de agua para la producción ganadera. Las estimaciones acerca de la intensidad del consumo de agua reflejan un consumo promedio de 3.32 m3/kg de leche producido en el escenario de línea base, lo cual se reduce en 37%, 72% y 74% en los escenarios con las intervenciones PM (1.86 m3/kg de leche), PM+ PRI (0.87 m3/kg de leche) y PM+PRI+SSP (0.81 m3/kg de leche), respectivamente. El consumo de agua por kg de carne se estimó en 21.87 m3/kg de carne para el escenario de línea base, y con las intervenciones el patrón de comportamiento es similar a los efectos estimados en el consumo de agua para la producción láctea; el consumo de agua se reduce con la implementación de las intervenciones en 23%, 64% y 67%, respectivamente para PM (16.77 m3/kg de carne), PM+PRI (7.81 m3/kg de carne) y PM+PRI+SSP (7.31 m3/kg de carne).En las próximas páginas se presentan a través de tablas y figuras por zona ganadera más detalles, para:• los diferentes niveles de inversión (Inv 2% y Inv 5%); Las Tablas 18 a 22 presentan los detalles de los impactos del paquete completo de las intervenciones (PM+PRI+SSP). Los Anexos F y G presentan respectivamente los impactos detallados de \"Pastos Mejorados\" solo, y de la combinación de \"Pastos Mejorados\"/\"Pastoreo Rotacional Intensivo\". El valor total de la producción y los costos operacionales presentan una clara tendencia a aumentar con la realización de inversiones de capital en innovaciones tecnológicas, observándose mayores aumentos en un escenario con una tasa de crecimiento anual del hato del 5%, tanto para todas las zonas como para las tipologías de productores. No obstante, ambos indicadores son menores en las zonas Pacífico y Seca que en las otras tres zonas, lo que se explica por las mayores escalas de producción en las zonas NFA, VLA y ZT. Los costos operacionales de producción aumentan con la implementación de las innovaciones con respecto a la línea base (LB), aunque existe una tendencia a que estos costos sean menores con la implementación de pastoreo rotacional intensivo (PRI) y la integración de las innovaciones en mejoramiento de pasturas con SSP (PM/PRI/SSP) en comparación con pasturas mejoradas en monocultivo (PM), gracias al aumento en la oferta de biomasa de pastos en cantidad y calidad lo que permite un aumento en la carga animal y por consiguiente una reducción considerable en el área total de pastos requerida para mantener el hato con similares características en los tres escenarios tecnológicos.Los costos operacionales en las tipologías de fincas de medianos y grandes productores son mayores en las zonas con mejores condiciones climáticas (VLA, NFA y ZT) en comparación con las otras dos zonas (ZS y ZT), lo que se explica por una mayor escala de operación debido al mayor tamaño promedio de fincas en aquellas zonas. Esta tendencia en los costos operacionales es explicada en gran medida por la tendencia en los costos totales de mano de obra los cuales representan en promedio el 50% del total de costos operacionales, para todos los escenarios; sin embargo, el porcentaje de participación de los costos de mano de obra en los costos totales operacionales es menor en las innovaciones, con un promedio del 44%, en comparación con el 64% en el escenario línea base.El balance económico es mayor en los escenarios de innovaciones del PRI y la integración PRI/PM/SSP en comparación con pasturas en monocultivo y la línea base, siendo mayor esos balances para las zonas con mejores condiciones climáticas. En todas las zonas existe una diferencia bastante estrecha entre el valor de la producción y los costos operacionales de producción para la situación actual o línea base generando un balance positivo promedio de apenas USD 0.09 por cada dólar de costos operacionales, alcanzando incluso valor negativo de USD -0.02 en la zona NFA, lo que indica la posibilidad de que existan perdidas económicas en la actividad de producción ganadera actual. Por otro lado, en ambos escenarios de crecimiento del hato (2 y 5 %) con inversiones en tecnologías, se tiene un balance positivo es, mientras que para los escenarios de crecimiento del hato del 5% y 2% anual con la implementación de innovaciones tecnológicas se obtiene un balance promedio cinco veces mayor que el balance promedio de la línea base, siendo y veces mayor al considerar solo el promedio de las zonas NFA, VLA y ZT.El impacto de las inversiones en el balance o la ganancia es mayor en las tipologías de los medianos y grandes productores en las zonas VLA, NFA y ZT, mientras que en la tipología de los pequeños productores en esas mismas zonas el impacto en el balance económico es relativamente muy bajo. En las zonas Seca y Pacífico se observa que hay un bajo impacto de las inversiones en las tres tipologías de productores y no hay diferencias entre los escenarios de crecimiento del hato.En las próximas páginas se presentan a través de tablas y figuras por zona ganadera más detalles, para:• los diferentes niveles de inversión (Inv 2% y Inv 5%); Las Tablas 23 a 27 presentan los detalles de los impactos del paquete completo de las intervenciones (PM+PRI+SSP). Los Anexos F y G presentan respectivamente los impactos económicos detallados de \"Pastos Mejorados\" solo, y de la combinación de \"Pastos Mejorados\"/\"Pastoreo Rotacional Intensivo\". Fuente: Censo 2011, análisis CLEANED, elaboración propia 4.5 Impacto de las intervenciones -nivel regional Esta sección presenta las consecuencias al nivel regional y nacional, basándose en una extrapolación de los datos en nivel de finca para los diferentes escenarios (Línea Base, Inversiones basadas en un crecimiento anual del hato de 2% y 5% respectivamente con la implementación de la combinación de pastos mejorados, pastoreo rotacional intensivo y sistemas silvopastoriles.El Anexo E provee por zona ganadera tablas con información detallada.El impacto de las intervenciones se proyectó bajo dos escenarios de crecimiento del hato:• 2% de crecimiento anual, asumiendo una mayor presión en las tasas de extracción, principalmente a través de la selección y descarte de hembras con problemas reproductivos y bajo potencial genético para producción de leche y ganancias de peso vivo, lo que significa un aumento a 5.2 millones de cabezas • 5% de crecimiento anual, asumiendo tasas de extracción similares a las estimadas durante el período 2010-2020 que ha generado esa tasa de crecimiento anual, lo que significa un aumento a un total de 7.15 millones de cabezas.Cabe aclarar que para este estudio solo se han considerado las explotaciones agropecuarias con ganado bovino que tienen un tamaño de área entre 1 y 200 Mz, las cuales representan casi el 95% del total que existen a nivel nacional. La Figura 49 presenta los resultados por zona ganadera y tasa de crecimiento.Figura 49: Evolución del hato por zona ganadera y nivel de inversión (2030)La implementación de las intervenciones tendrá impactos significativos en los principales indicadores productivos y de eficiencia reproductiva, principalmente en la tasa de parición del hato, producción anual de leche por hembra adulta disponible en el hato y las tasas de ganancia de peso vivo en animales jóvenes desde 1 hasta 24 meses después del nacimiento. Este impacto en los indicadores productivos generará un aumento significativo en la producción nacional de leche de 109% y 190% con respecto a la línea base al pasar de 1.1 millones t a 2.3 y 3.2 millones t de leche en los escenarios de crecimiento del hato del 2% y 5%, respectivamente. El aumento en la producción láctea nacional será liderado por las zonas VLA y ZT con una contribución promedio del 42% y 27%, respectivamente para cada zona, seguidos por la zona NFA y ZS con una contribución promedio del 16% y 11.5%, respectivamente (Figura 50).El crecimiento en la producción de carne se estima será menor que el crecimiento de la producción láctea, con tasas de crecimiento anual del 66% y 125%, respectivamente para los escenarios del 2% y 5% de crecimiento del hato. Este crecimiento también será liderado por las zonas NFA y ZT con aportes promedios del 47% y 25%, respectivamente, seguido por la contribución del 13.5% y 10.0% de las zonas NFA y ZS, respectivamente (Figura 51). Aunque al nivel nacional la modelación con la herramienta CLEANED estima para los escenarios de línea base un requerimiento de tierras para producción de forrajes y otros alimentos similar a lo que está actualmente en uso reportado en CENAGRO (2011), hay diferencias considerables entre las zonas ganaderas. En ZT, ZP y ZS el requerimiento excede la disponibilidad, lo que ratifica las opiniones y percepciones de especialistas nacionales acerca del déficit alimenticio del ganado, en cantidad y calidad, que se expresa en los bajos niveles de producción y productividad del ganado. Como mostrado al nivel de finca, las intervenciones propuestas reducen considerablemente el requerimiento de tierra, en algunos casos con más de 50% (Figura 52).Figura 52: Requerimiento de tierra (Mz) por zona ganadera y nivel de inversión (2030)El balance de nitrógeno en el total del área requerida para producción de pastos y cultivos forrajeros será afectado en forma negativa, producto de las mayores salidas de este elemento que las entradas en dichas áreas, sin considerar aportes de fertilización. La estimación de este balance para el escenario de LB es de -107.1 miles de t de nitrógeno, lo cual se estima aumentará en promedio casi 4 veces al pasar a -559.7 y -553.5 miles de t de nitrógeno en los escenarios del 2 y 5% de crecimiento del hato. Los aportes por zonas en estas pérdidas de nitrógeno serán en promedio -293.8, -139.5, -120.8, -2.5 y -0.256 miles de t de nitrógeno, respectivamente para las zonas VLA, ZT, NFA, ZP y ZS (Figura 53). Las emisiones anuales de GEI también aumentarán en los escenarios con intervenciones en comparación al escenario de LB con una emisión de 8.5 MT CO2-eq. Las emisiones en los escenarios del 2 y 5% se estiman en 10.8 y 14.9 MT CO2-eq, lo que representan aumentos del 27 y 75%, respectivamente. Los mayores aportes en las emisiones nacionales de GEI por la actividad ganadera serán por las zonas VLA y ZT, seguidas por las zonas NFA, ZS y ZP, con 44%, 25%, 16%, 11% y 3.5% de las emisiones totales, respectivamente para cada zona. Aunque se estiman aumentos en las emisiones GEI con la implementación de las intervenciones, esto se verá compensado con el aumento en el potencial de captura de carbono lo cual generará aumentos considerables en el almacenamiento de carbono en los escenarios con intervenciones respecto a la LB. El almacenamiento de carbono en el escenario de la LB se estima en 5.6 MT de CO2-eq (bosques y pastos mejorados), lo cual aumentará considerablemente a 19.2 MT y 24.1 MT de CO2-eq para los escenarios del 2 y 5% con intervenciones tecnológicas. El balance de carbono resulta positivo en todas las zonas y las contribuciones por zonas presenta el mismo patrón de comportamiento que los otros indicadores, siendo siempre mayor en las zonas VLA y ZT (Figura 54).Figura 54: Emisiones de GEI y almacenamiento de carbono (1000 t CO2eq) por zona ganadera y nivel de inversión (2030)El consumo total de agua disminuyera en casi todos los casos en comparación con la Línea Base, por tres razones principales, (1) el requerimiento reducido de área por rendimientos más altos de pastos y otros forrajes, (2) una proporción más alta de pastos y forrajes más adaptados a condiciones de sequía, (3) más altos niveles de producción animal (Figura 55).Figura 55: Requerimiento de agua (millón m3) por zona ganadera y nivel de inversión (2030)En términos económicos, los aumentos en los volúmenes de producción de carne y leche representan un valor de 724 y 1,350 millones de USD, que equivalen a aumentos del 84 y 156%, respectivamente para los escenarios del 2 y 5% de crecimiento anual del hato, lo cual implica una contribución significativa en la economía del país a través de la generación de mayores empleos a los largo de las cadenas de valor de leche y carne, aumentos en la capacidad adquisitiva de esos trabajadores y por las exportaciones de carne y lácteos. No obstante que esos aumentos en los volúmenes y valores de la producción de carne y leche implicarán aumentos en los costos de producción, el balance económico de la actividad se mantendrá en valores positivos y aumentará en relación al valor de la línea base, pasando de 67 millones de USD a 644 y 908 millones de USD en los escenarios de 2 y 5% de crecimiento del hato, respectivamente. Las contribuciones por zonas en los valores de producción, costos y balance de la actividad ganadera a nivel nacional, sigue el mismo patrón que los indicadores productivos, destacando las zonas VLA y ZT como las de mayores aportes seguidas por las zonas NFA, ZS y ZP (Figura 56). ","tokenCount":"6755"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1206851617.json b/data/part_2/1206851617.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..df411dac29cbd622c0b0796c0e75c6f875e68487 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1206851617.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ed61daee58b0785bd57318d89b8ec0c8","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/89f15841-f3af-40f3-a57c-a32641e2d3aa/retrieve","id":"-378196595"},"keywords":["Ralstonia solanacearum","coring method","potato","ELISA"],"sieverID":"dafbb540-2a78-43ef-9fff-73cae19ff189","pagecount":"6","content":"Bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum is considered among the most damaging diseases of potato in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Kenya, majority of farmers visually select and save seed from harvested potato tubers and reuse the same tubers for several seasons. Latently infected seed tubers which cannot be identified by visual inspection during certification further compounds the situation compelling the need for laboratory testing. The study evaluated the effectiveness of coring tuber samples to improve sampling efficiency for onward laboratory diagnosis. In this study, the coring method of sampling potato tubers for detection R. solanacearum was evaluated. Coring involves taking multiple tuber samples direct from the stolon attachment site into a collection tube containing extraction buffer that provides the extract for further diagnostic tests. Coring was assessed using field samples from different potato growing regions of Kenya including, Koibatek,Potato (Solanum tubersum) belongs to the Solanaceae family and is the second most important food crop after maize in Kenya [1]. It is grown by about 800,000 farmers, cultivating 150,000 hectares with an annual production of approximately 1 million tonnes over two growing seasons. National potato production ranges from 4.4 to 15 t/ha with an average of 6.7 t/ha, although yields of 40 t/h have been attained under research conditions [1]. Low-quality seed, diseases such as bacterial wilt and late blight and low soil fertility as well as high cost of inputs such as certified potato tubers have attributed to production constraints resulting into low yield [2].Ralstonia solanacearum is a pathogen that causes bacterial wilt disease in over 450 plant species including many economically important crops such as potato, tomato, eggplant, peanut, pepper, garlic, banana and ginger [3,4]. The disease causes serious problems for potato production in Kenya affecting 77% of potato farms [2]. Vegetative propagated crops, such as potato, are particularly vulnerable to infection due to latent infections. The use of clean certified seed potato and good cultural practices are the most effective methods to manage the disease [3].In Kenya, the standard sampling method of seed potato involves taking 400 whole potato tubers per hectare for diagnosis. The potato tubers are further sub-sampled by pooling batches of 25 tubers to constitute a single sample. The pooled potato tubers are prepared for diagnosis of R. solanacearum by cutting through each tuber using a blade and physically ringing out the vascular tissues. This method can be timeconsuming and labor intensive thus resulting in a prolonged time of testing since whole potato tubers have to be transported back to the testing facility for preparation before laboratory diagnosis is commenced. To better manage bacterial wilt disease in Kenya, a faster and cheaper method of sampling that can easily be adapted is in demand to improve sampling efficiency.This work report use of potato coring device [5] to sample potato tubers to detect R. solanacearum directly in the field. Potato tubers were randomly collected from 5 farms from Koibatek, Molo, Uasin Gishu, Mt. Elgon and Kisii. The survey involved collecting 25 potato tubers from 1/8 of a hectare per field which was cored and pooled to constitute a single sample. Sampled tubers were surface sterilized with 70% ethanol and cored at the stolon end using a potato coring device (courtesy of J. Smith, Fera Science Ltd, York, UK; Fig. 2). The corer was disinfected between samples by dipping the metal portion of the tool in 95-100% alcohol and pass through a flame to completely burn off the alcohol before use. One pooled cored sample was placed into a collection tube containing extraction buffer (phosphate buffer pH 7.0; Na 2 HPO 4 , KH 2 PO 4 and antioxidant; tetrazolium pyrophosphate). The samples were transported to the laboratory and the mixture transferred to a maceration bag and homogenized with a tissue homogenizer. The coring method of sampling was evaluated against the standard sampling method which involved taking 400 tubers from 200 randomly selected potato plants. Manual extraction of the tuber vascular tissues was done using a scalpel/ knife (25 tubers to constitute a single sample) and transferred into a single bag for crushing.The potato tubers were tested for R. solanacearum by NCM ELISA kit (CIP, Lima, Peru) [6]. Briefly, pooled potato tuber containing 25 tubers per sample were cored and macerated in extraction buffer containing 0.1 M citrate buffer (pH 5.6) and incubated in semi-selective broth 48 h with constant agitation. Dot blotting and ELISA was performed on a nitrocellulose membrane with positive and negative field samples for R. solanacearum identified through color reactions on nitrocellulose membrane.The results from ELISA were compared to Conventional PCR [7] 2006, [8] qPCR and LAMP [9]. Briefly, conventional PCR was carried out in 20 µl reactions 4 pmol of primers 759/760 and 2 µl of DNA extracted from field collected potato tubers. Reactions were heated to 96°C for 5 minutes and then cycled through 30 cycles of 94°C for 15 seconds, 59°C for 30 seconds and 72°C for 30 seconds. Samples (5 µl) of reaction mixtures were examined by electrophoresis through 2% agarose gels and bands were revealed by staining in 0.5 µg mL-1 gel red. Positive detection by NCM ELISA was observed in 16 out of 20 pooled cored tuber samples. Negative controls containing healthy potato tubers did not test positive for R. solanacearum (Table 1). In addition, a separate control (1 infected tuber in 24 disease-free tubers) tested positive for R. solanacearum. The results of the ELISA assay for all the 20 pooled field samples that tested either positive or negative gave similar results when compared to conventional PCR, qPCR and LAMP. The study evaluated the effectiveness of coring tuber samples to assess whether cored samples can provide accurate results for further laboratory diagnosis. The results indicated that the coring method worked perfectly just as the standard sampling method currently used in Kenya [6,10].The procedure involves cutting a thin slice of the tuber from around the stolon end with a scalpel and removing a strip of about 3 x 3 mm along the vascular tissues for detection of R. solanacearum. The results indicated that the standard practice of sampling potato tubers in Kenya for detection of R. solanacearum was statistically reliable (p>0.05) when compared to coring method. Thus, coring and the standard practice of sampling potato tubers in Kenya were absolutely similar in terms of reliability for detection of R. solanacearum. Previous studies have illustrated that coring method of sampling was reliable and efficient for detection of R. solanacearum [5,11] using conventional PCR and qPCR. The method entails taking whole tubers back to the diagnostic facility before sample processing which is tedious, labor intensive and cumbersome process. Coring leaves waste at the sampling site thus no need to carry bulky tubers back to the testing facility. This eliminated the burden of cumbersome disposal processes of infected waste as tuber waste is left at the sampling site.The coring method compared to the standard method of sampling potato tubers was efficient in detection R. solanacearum in field collected potato tubers. Previous studies have indicated the physical removal of vascular tissues after dissection using a scalpel also resulted into positive detection of R. solanacearum in potentially infected field collected potato tubers [11,6]. During the extraction process, it was evident that coring resulted in quicker extraction and reduced labor time as opposed to manual extraction of vascular tissue as no dissection of potato tubers was required. Coring can be undertaken in the field, therefore, improving the efficiency of the sampling process. Coring is currently not practiced in Kenya hence can be adapted to increase the efficiency of the sample preparation process. Besides the coring method can also be undertaken in the field to reduce the turn-around time of testing by doing away with sample preparation in the lab as long as testing is undertaken within 48 h before the cored samples begin to degrade. Coring is currently not practiced in Kenya hence can be adapted to increase the efficiency of the sample preparation process. Besides the coring method can also be undertaken in the field to reduce the turn-around time of testing by doing away with sample preparation in the lab as long as testing is undertaken within 48 h. ","tokenCount":"1355"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1225627877.json b/data/part_2/1225627877.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aa745cc29454510ff011a159fd1729524022b1b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1225627877.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"767e03c6c2a71a68d637e7e8405fa62c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/3bf7cf22-806f-4984-9000-c6cfc620112e/retrieve","id":"617689472"},"keywords":["mineral fertilizer","Crop residue","manure","cropping system","soil fertility","longterm trial"],"sieverID":"d133e884-98b0-4175-a69c-0068b6cf6100","pagecount":"20","content":"Soils of Tropical Africa have been formed mainly from Pre-Cambrian materials and others from erosion process. Because of the type of parent material, the soils are characterized by a poor native fertility surface crusting and low water holding capacity. In Africa 65% of the agricultural land, 31% of the permanent pasture land, and 19% of the forest and woodland is affected by human-induced soil degradation. The nutrient depletion is the most important element in the land degradation equation. With increasing population pressure on the land, the traditional farming system (natural fallow) to restore soil fertility is no longer possible. The present farming systems are unsustainable and destructive to the environment with negative plant nutrient balances resulting to a mining agriculture. Many long term trials show that although application of mineral fertilizers is an effective mean of increasing yields in arable farming systems, mineral fertilizers alone cannot sustain yields in the long run. When mineral fertilizers are combined with crop residue or manure, added to cereal-legume intercropped or rotated, sustainable production can be obtained.Soil degradation, loss of organic matter, low soil fertility and yields, poverty, high CO2, global climatic changes are the main factors reducing crop production in the world. In the Sahel, low rainfall and its variability and distribution, dry spells and other adversities such as climatic factors affecting the rainy season affect crop production. Production losses are mainly due to drought (2/3) and cricket attack (1/3) (Nanga 2005). Water balance in the region is positive only 3 months of the year; meaning that water still a limitative factor for crop production in a region where 90% of the population is rural and depend on a subsidence rainfall agriculture. Millet is the main crop in CILSS countries with 45% of cereal production followed by sorghum (28%) and maize (11%). Niger is the second after Burkina Faso with 27% of cereal production. Niger, with a population of 12.94 millions in 2006, is one of the food deficit countries in the world (CILSS/Agrhymet 2005). Only 12% of the country has an annual rainfall of 600 mm and 10% with 350-600 mm. Cereal crop needs at least 300 mm if well distributed (Moustapha 2003). Cereal production in 2004/2005 was estimated to 2,449,900 tones with a negative balance of 223,350 tones, equivalent to 7.5% of Niger population needs or 2,991,600 tones (Nanga 2005). Niger is the poorest country in the world according to the UNDP classification based on IDH. 98% of the cereal production in Niger is from rainwater; rice that is the principal irrigated crop is less than 2% of the total cereal production. It depends to rainfall and in 2004, rice production decreased to only 0.5% of cereal production (FAO 2004).Population pressure has reduced cultivable area and traditional fallow is no longer feasible. It's known that millet is a crop adapted to Sahel conditions but combined to soil fertility constraints; low rainfall can reduce crop productivity. In this context of soil degradation and poor climatic conditions, farmer's practice is not adapted. ICRISAT research is to find and propose to farmers adapted soil fertility technologies, water use efficiency and adapted varieties which combinations can significantly improve crops yields.This study is to improve natural resources management in these poor soils and weather conditions. Soil nutrients such as phosphorus, nitrogen, manure in an erratic rainfall conditions are shown in the study on a long term basis.Experiments addressing several research themes were carried out along a bioclimatic gradient at several benchmark locations in West Africa using commonly developed research protocols. The long-term on-station trials from which originated the technologies tested on-farm continued to run with the objective of identifying sustainability indicators and optimizing the use of organic and inorganic resources available to the land users. Soil samples from the long-term trials were collected for measurement of these parameters.Since 2000, these long-term on-station trials and others in different sites were run under TSBF Network collaboration with ICRISAT with a challenge to help empower farmers and land managers to combat soil nutrient depletion and land degradation, which are both serious threats to food production on the continent. The objective of these network activities is to develop and implement management options that both mitigate soil degradation, deforestation and biological resources losses and enhance local economies while protecting the natural resource base. This document will first give the highlights of the longest on-station trials run by TSBF Network in Niger, West Africa. The second part will give a brief description of other trials from different locations. The results of these experiments are reported every year in an annual report.Fields close to the village receiving high organic matter due to human and animal activities are more productive compared to the others. Prudencio (1993) have observed such fertility gradient between fields closest to the homestead (home gardens/infields) and those furthest (bush fields/outfields). Soil organic carbon contents of between 11 and 22 g/kg have been observed in home gardens compared with 2-5 g/kg soil in bush fields. Fofana et al. (2006) in a comparative study at Karabédji-Niger on degraded lands (bush fields) and non degraded (infields) have observed that millet grain yield across years and fertilizer averaged only 800 kg/ha in bush fields and 1,360 kg/ha on infields. Recovery of fertilizer N (RFN) applied varied considerably and ranged from 17% to 23% on bush fields and from 34% to 37% on infields. Similarly, recovery of fertilizer P (RFP) was 18% for bush fields and 31% for infields over 3 years cropping. It's clear that degraded soils are poor in organic carbon their response to fertilizer are less and the recovery of fertilizer applied is very low. Soil degradation was defined by FAO (2002) as the loss of soil productivity capacity in term of decreased fertility, biodiversity and natural resources. Yield loss due to soil degradation in Africa varied from 2% to 50% the last 10 years (Scherr 1999). Bationo et al. (2006a, b) in Scherr (1999) and in Oldeman et al. (1992) in a description of the level of degradation of arable soils in Africa and in the rest of the world have shown a proportion of 38% in the world and 65% in Africa. During the last 30 years, nutrients losses in Africa soils are equivalent to 1.400 kg/ ha N (urea), 375 kg/ha of SSP (phosphorus) and 896 kg/ha of KCl (potassium). In Niger, Henao and Baanante (2006) have estimated nutrients losses to 56 kg/ha (NPK) during 2002-2004 cropping season.Long term average of millet and sorghum grain yields are respectively 400 and 190 kg/ha; but in 2002 and 2003 with respective cereal production 3,336,956 and 3,561,660 tones in Niger, average millet and sorghum grain yields were respectively 461 and 476 kg/ha (FAO 2004). Research at ICRISAT (rapport annuel 1985) have shown that in the semi-arids zones of the Sahel where annual rainfall is over 300 mm, nutrients are more limitative than water in crop production. At Sadore (Niger), with 560 mm of annual rainfall, 1.24 kg of millet grain per mm of water was harvested without fertilizer and 4.14 kg of millet grain per mm of water when fertilizer was used (Bationo et al. 2006a, b). In Oumou and Ed Heinemann (2006), Africa account for only 3% in the world fertilizer consumption with 13% of world arable soils and 12% of world population. Sub-saharan Africa (excluding South Africa) account for less than 1% in the world fertilizer consumption equivalent to 9 kg/ha compared Asia 148 kg/ha and Pacific. In 2002, fertilizer consumption in Niger was 1.1 kg/ha only; and one tone of fertilizer cost 400 $ compared to 90 $ in Europe whereas a Nigerien is living with less than 1 $ per day making fertilizer less affordable.If fertilizer is affordable for farmers, the hill placement of small quantity (4 kg P/ha) can double millet grain yield. Tabo et al. (2006) have shown that micro-dose (4 kg P/ha) increased millet and sorghum grain yields up to 43-120% and farmer's income were improved trough Warrantage by 52-134% in the studied countries (Burkina Faso, Mali et Niger) (Table 6.1).Since 1986 a long-term soil fertility management was established by ICRISAT Sahelian Center to study the sustainability of pearl millet based cropping systems in relation to management of N, P, and crop residue, rotation of cereal with cowpea and soil tillage. The data in Table 6.2 give the main treatments in this trial. In this split-split-plot design the split-split plot consisted of crop residue application or no crop residue application consisting of leaving half of the total crop residue produced in the plot and the sub-sub plot was with or without nitrogen application. Four replications are used in this experiment.Very low yields were observed on control plots in both grain and TDM yields. The other treatments show high yields with better yield for T7 and T9 combining rotation, phosphorus and respectively animal traction (AT) and hand cultivation (HC) (Fig. 6.1).Nitrogen effect is similar on both grain and TDM yields showing better yield on plot receiving N. But when annual rainfall was combined to yields, the higher TDM yield was observed with the higher annual rainfall; whereas millet grain was not subjected to higher rainfall. It shows that plant growth was better when nutrient and rainfall are combined; but grain production was subjected to other factors than annual rainfall only (Fig. 6.2). Crop Residue (CR) effect was similar to N effect showing an increased yield when CR was applied. The higher TDM yield was also obtained with higher annual rainfall but grain yield doesn't follow the same trend (Fig. 6.3). Since 1993 a factorial experiment was initiated at the research station of ICRISAT Sahelian Center at Sadore, Niger. The first factor was three levels of fertilizers (0, 4.4 kg P + 15 kg N/ha, 13 kg P + 45 kg N/ha), the second factor was crop residue applied at (300, 900 and 2,700 kg/ha) and the third factor was manure applied at (300, 900 and 2,700 kg/ha). The cropping systems are continuous pearl millet, pearl millet in rotation with cowpea and pearl millet in association with cowpea. Three replications were used for this experiment. Cropping systems have shown a good performance of rotation compared to the two other systems in both grain and TDM yields and during the whole period. There is no correlation between annual rainfall and millet grain and TDM production. The last 2 years were showing low yields whereas their annual rainfall were similar or higher than other years (Fig. 6.4).Although there is no significant difference between the different rates of CR, the higher yield was obtained with 2,700 kg/ha of CR. Annual rainfall was not correlated again to millet grain and TDM yields (Fig. 6.5).Manure application shows a large difference of millet grain and TDM yields with high yield for 2,700 kg/ha of manure. No correlation between annual rainfall and millet production; each factor varying independently (Fig. 6.6). The uses of fertilizer have shown a very large difference between the control and the plot receiving P and N with a very high yields for the high rate. It's clear that N and P application have increased millet grain and TDM yield independently to the annual rainfall (Fig. 6.7).This crop residue (CR) trial established since 1982 show a large cumulative effect on the soil (organic carbon, protection against erosion…) over these years. Four replications and four treatments consisting to: traditional, sole application of CR, sole application of fertilizer (F) and CR+F. Each plot was split-plot to include rotation with half cowpea and half millet rotated every year. CR application consisted to leave the previous year millet Stover in the plot. Data collected from 1984 to 2007 shows a significant difference between treatments. Yields in the control plot still low every year whereas Fertilizer + CR gave the higher yield and intermediary yield for the two other treatments: Figs. 6.8 and 6.9.Rainfall significance was shown in multiple ways: better rainfall was supposed to give better yields. It's not always the case, different situations were observed while combining yields and annual rainfall. With the lowest environmental mean of millet grain: 324 and 296 kg/ha respectively in 1993 and 2003, the corresponding rainfall were not very low: 541.7 and 534.3 mm but enough for a good production as in 1996 where a similar rainfall (543.9 mm) gave 1,362 kg/ha of grain. The worst annual rainfall was recorded in 2000 with 392.7 mm but millet grain yield was 753 kg/ha. In 1994 millet TDM yield was very low: 2,514 kg/ha with exceptional annual rainfall of 793.8 mm. It's clear that other internal factors such as rainfall repartition and drought spell affect more crop production than cumulative rainfall only. A survey on the daily rainfall demonstrated that when a contradiction occurred on the relation between annual rainfall and crop production, some explication can be found in its repartition.For example the good yield in 1996 was related to a very good repartition although the annual rainfall was only 543.9 compared to 1994 where annual rainfall was 793.8. Similarly, the bad repartition of the same amount of annual rainfall gave very low yields in 1993 and 2003. The drought spells that occurred during the grain filling period affected more grain yield and those in the plant growth period affected more TDM yield. A complete factorial experiment was carried out with three levels of manure (0, 3, 6 t/ha) three level of P (0, 6.5 and 13 kg/P ha) using two methods of application (broadcast and hill placement).The data collected give the response of millet to P and manure for the two methods of application. For pearl millet grain the hill placement of manure performed better than broadcasting and with no application of P fertilizer.The data for cowpea are showing also the same effect as for pearl millet. A very high yield of cowpea fodder can be produced with hill placement of manure and by the way using it for feeding animals can delay the difficult affordability of manure.Phosphate Rock (PR) was broadcast (bc) and/or hill placed (HP). For pearl millet grain P use efficiency for broadcasting SSP at 13 kg P/ha was low but hill placement of SSP at 4 kg P/ha gave a higher PUE. It also increased when NPK hill placed at 4 kg P/ha was combined to PR broadcast. For cowpea fodder PUE was also better with P hill placed. Those data clearly indicate that P placement can drastically increase P use efficiency and the placement of small quantities of water-soluble P fertilizers can also improve the effectiveness of phosphate rock. Past research results indicated a very attractive technology consisting of hill placement of small quantities of P fertilizers. With DAP containing 46% P2O5 and a compound NPK fertilizer (15-15-15) containing only 15% P2O5, fields trials were carried out by farmers on 46 plot per treatment at Karabedji to compare the economic advantage of the two sources of P for millet production.As hill placement can result in soil P mining another treatment was added consisting of application of phosphate rock at 13 kg P/ha plus hill placement of 4 kg P/ha as NPK compound fertilizers.The data clearly shows that there was no difference between hill placement of DAP and 15-15-15 indicating that with the low cost per unit of P associated with DAP, this source of fertilizer should be recommended to farmers. The basal application of Tahoua Phosphate rock gave about additional 200 kg/ha of pearl millet grain. The combination of hill placement of water-soluble P fertilizer with phosphate rock seems a very attractive option for the resource poor farmers in this region. The data is showing the variation of yield of each plot in farmers fields as compared to the farmer's practices and clearly shows that the application of Tahoua PR with hill placement of water soluble P outperformed the other treatments in most instances.At Gaya, with 50 plots per treatment the same effect can be observed and DAP seem better than NPK and confirm the choice on this source. 4. Cropping systems and mineral fertilizers evaluation (Sadore, Karabedji, and Gaya, Niger) Farmers' practices were compared to a three cropping systems consistency on pure millet crop with planting density at recommended level to be rotated next year with a pure cowpea, a fourth plot with millet and cowpea intercropped but not as farmer's practice. Here four lines of cowpea are to be rotated with two lines of millet. Tahoua Phosphate rock at 13 kg P/ha and NPK hill placed at 4 kg P/ha were applied for each plot except farmer's practice.The data indicates that millet grain yield can be increased two to three fold with this system and higher biomass can be yielded specially for cowpea introducing crop-livestock integration. The same trial was implemented at Karabedji and gave a similar effect as Sadore. At Gaya, cowpea was replaced by groundnut due to the lake of grain production some particular years. These data shows how the yield of the technologies evaluated fluctuated as compared to the farmers' practices with the high density and rotation systems dominating the other systems in most instances. PR P sources gave approximately the same yields in both millet grain and cowpea fodder while the combination of PR (50%) and inorganic P (50%) gave better yield. 6. Interaction of N, P and manure (karabedji, Banizoumbou and Gaya Niger)A factorial experiment of manure (0, 2 and 4 t/ha), nitrogen (0, 30 and 60 kg N/ha) and phosphorus (0, 6.5 and 13 kg P/ha) was established in the three sites to assess the fertilizer equivalency of manure for N and P. The data shows a very significant effect of N, P and manure on pearl millet yield. But everywhere the analysis demonstrated that P is the most limiting factors. Manure and nitrogen accounted less in the system and their effect were better when combined with P. 7. Comparative effect of mineral fertilizer on degraded and non-degraded soils (Karabedji, Niger) This is also a long-term soil fertility managed trial as started in 1999 and still running. Mineral fertilizers were applied on two major type of soils: Farm close the village (non-degraded) where household waste, human excreta and farm yard manure are commonly used and farm far from the village degraded and without any organic material added. The results show a high significant effect of the application of Phosphorus on pearl millet grain and total dry matter yields. P significance is higher but nitrogen significance is linked to the availability of P or organic fertilizer in the soil. The system (degraded and non-degraded) shows a very high significance meaning that organic fertilizers are important. The data show that the application of P increased significantly both millet grain and total dry matter yields and it is more important in fertile soils where it is combined with organic fertilizer. Nitrogen alone gives no significance but when combined with P the result is clear (Figs. 6.10 and 6.11). The different soil fertility technologies tested in the different experiments and sites have improved the millet grain and TDM yields. Results have shown that the yield in the control plot is always lower than the environmental mean while improved technologies gave higher yields. Both organic and inorganic amendments have increased millet production but their effects were different from a year to another. Organic amendment performance was lower than inorganic but their combination was better.Cropping systems experimented have shown a very good performance for the rotation where the previous leguminous crop gives additional nitrogen and organic amendment to the soil.The annual rainfall and yields variations were not correlated meaning that factors other than rainfall have affected millet production. The illustration was made in 2007 where millet was planted in July 14th and rain stopped in September 14th. The poorest environmental mean was observed this year with only 2 month of rain while millet cycle was at least 3 month. In most of the cases that yields were low, rain stopped early or long drought spell occurred during the cropping season. The performance of the technologies tested will be better if these negative factors were addressed.All data presented here were yields data; some soil samples were periodically took but no analysis was made due to budget constraint. If soil analysis was done, it could help in following soil fertility status. Please check the modified page range for Reference Prudencio (1993).Please confirm the reference Scherr (1999) ","tokenCount":"3381"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1228689883.json b/data/part_2/1228689883.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a9ccf03ebe250f787742b260d2713c39723e5c2a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1228689883.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a5465cdf524b0080177fef725e6bdf99","source":"gardian_index","url":"http://ciat-library.ciat.cgiar.org/Articulos_Ciat/Digital/S_540.8.C4_C4277_CIAT_Program_Plans_and_Funding_Requirements.pdf","id":"730154506"},"keywords":["Core Comple-Total 2,,~1 93ii 502''52 ' \" ,., \"554 I~I,P¡' 355 310 715 .1.7.,::':~\".\"\"\",~ _~.,\"\"\"',:.l55 _ _ _ \",.......,\"\"\"',/',.\"\"'\"O::-,.,.~\"\"'_~\\j\"*_¡ ¡","o¡",".... p .... ,%,. ••• \"\" \\ \"U, 9 \"i'iN4!if\\","\"\",**\"\"\",\"\"**9. ji"],"sieverID":"612d2422-eb44-4bf3-bf7a-cfb94617c6e6","pagecount":"41","content":"In 1994, the core budget supported 1,118 support staff positions (an additional 50 support staff positions were financed with complementary funding).In 1995, assuming that the CGIAR will be in a position partially to make up for the revaluation of the Colombian Peso (see discussion below), the work program as approved by the CGIAR in the latter half of 1994 can be continued, with the same deployment 01 senior staff as in 1994.The budget request for 1996 is based on the T AC recommendation for core funding of CIAT, and proposes to continue the research program presented in the Action Plan.cutting and personnel reduction plan, CIAT is forcing cost reductions in 1995 amounting to US$2.4 million, or 4.9% of its 1994 budget base.CIAT Management and the CIAT Board have carefully analyzed the implications of these cost cutting measures and concluded that the Center cannot absorb cost ¡ncreases beyond 4.9% without doing irreparable damage to the Action Plan (which, by itself, was an effort to operationalize the Medium-Term Plan at the lowest possible cost). Therefore, CIAT is implementing a 1995 working budget of $29,600,000, which is $2,100,000 above the proposed funding level in 1995. CIAT is making a special case to the Finance Committee for an adjustment in its 1995 funding base of $2,100,000, so that the Center may be able to execute its 1995 work program without incurring a deficit.1996 Financial Year. Based on the best estimates available from government, the financial community, and industry as to the behavior of the Colombian Peso vis-ca-vis inflation in the 1995/1996 period, we are estimating that the cost increases for CIAT will be 7%. (The same projections show that the revaluation of the Colombian Peso will have run its course by the end of 1996.) CIAT is making plans to absorb 3% of the projected cost increases in 1996 (Le., the expected inflation rate in OECD countries). This will mean, however, that for 1996, the funding base will need to be adjusted by $1,200,000 (4% of the 1995 funding base) in order to make up for the cost of the revaluation effect.The Table on top of page 4 summarizes the financial information as presented here.NOTE: The Tables at the end of this document are based on the CGIAR (1995) and TAC (1996) core funding recommendations, and therefore do not contemplate adjustments for the cost of the revaluation of the Colombian Peso. Accordingly, the Tables show the cost of that part of the revaluation effect which CIAT is unable to absorb as operating deficits in 1995 and 1996.By using its research and technology development skills, CIAT endeavors to help developing countries achieve agricultural growth. distribute the resulting benefits equitably to alleviate poverty. and maintain or even enhance the agricultural resource base. To fulfill this mission, CIAT draws on three areas of strength, which together characterize the Center. 1. Commodities: The Center researches four commodities for which it has either a global mandate (beans, cassava) or a restricted mandate (tropical pastures for acid, infertile soils; rice for Latín America and the Caribbean).With appropriate technologies, these four commodities hold enormous potential for contributing to sustainable agricultural development.Through ils more recent commitment to research on the torest margins, hillsides, and savannas of Latin America. the Center is gaining expertise on vital resource management issues of these agroecosystems.Strategic research competences: CIA T's expertise in a wide range ot agricultural and related disciplines enables it to conduct path-breakíng research on themes that cut across crops and agroecosystems.A major challenge for CIA T is to generate new interest and commitment among research partners and donors to exercise these strengths in a coordinated and complementary fashion. The Center must actively design research around links between its mandate crops and other species, and among commodity, resource management, and land use issues.CIAT has six research programs:Although this program structure reflects a continuing commitment to the Center's crop mandates, it has little meaning unless commodity research extends from conservation and utilization of genetic resources to networking with research partners and clients.The investment of donors• resources in these activities is justified by the importance of (1) beans, cassava, and rice in the livelihoods and diets of the poor;(2) tropical forages as an essential input of livestock production and as a key component of sustainable farming systems; and (3) hillsides and tropical lowlands as agroecologies in Latin America.Starting in 1994, all activities of CIA T's research programs are being restructured along project lines. Each program delineates its research in terms of project areas, which are subdivided into projects and subprojects.Through its scientific resource groups (SRGs), CIAT can effectively encourage innovation within the various scientific disciplines that contribute to its mission.Each group comprises the Center•s scientific expertise in one of five areas and their respective research units. The five groups, their respective units, and overa\" objectives are:1 .Genetic Diversity (Genetic Resources Unit). Collect, conserve, analyze, evaluate, and distribute genetic diversity within and among selected species to support germplasm development. Help other institutions in Latin America characterize, conserve, and monitor a wide range of plant genetic diversity.Germplasm Development (Biotechnology Research Unít). Identify sources of useful genetic variability; assemble and recombine this variability into pools and complexes tor variety development (using both conventional and biotechnology approaches); devise efficient selection techniques for rapid enrichment with desirable genes; and promote networks for disseminating improved germplasm.Provide tools for detecting and monitoring pests and pathogens, gene complexes that can provide durable resistance, and biological control agents.Provide new knowledge on resistance mechanisms and the dynamic relationships among pests, diseases, natural enemies, and their plant hosts.Develop sustainable systems that combine plant species lo increase productivity, maintain adequate soil cover, cycle nutrients efficiently, and increase soil organic matter.Land Management (Geographic Information Systems). Analyze current patterns ot land use and develop tools tor designing sustainable land management strategies, including analysis of community action and government policies.The expertise of the first three groups relates mainly to CIA T's mandate commodities and their wild relatives. But, in its role as a convening center for ecoregional research, where its work cuts across crops and agroecologies, the Center will apply, in selected cases and with the collaboration of national partners, its capabilities to the integration of other species in sustainable farming systems.The Center will step outside its commodity mandates only where this would enhance its contributions to resource management and related work in the hillside and lowland tropical environments ot Latin America. In Africa and Asia, its commodity research will focus exclusively on beans, cassava, and tropical forages.The fourth and fifth scientific resource groups will focus primarily on torest margins, hillsides, and savannas in Latin America, but should also provide significant input tor commodity programs and the other scientific resource groups.Scientitic resource groups are new to CIAT. Initially, they were established to provide continuity and cohesiveness to the work of scientists operating in given areas ot competence across different research programs. When implementing the Action Plan, however, scientitic resources groups quickly became important sources of project identification and/or generation. In tact, the projects identified by the scientific resources groups contributed heavily to the mandates and objectives of CIAT in general, and to the objectives of different research programs in particular. Hence, the scientific resources groups were given the opportunity lo formulate, in conjunction with the research programs, their own research projects. While the specific research units attached to the scientitic resources groups already have ongoing research projects, the scientific resources groups, as yet, do not have their own research projects approved and financed.Projects: The Hub of Activity CIA T's experience shows that agricultural research can no longer be organized around broad-based research programs. Not only are such programs inflexible vis-a-vis constantly changing external demands and opportunities, but their outputs are also more difficult to document and highlight in a world that continually looks for results, feedback, and proof of relevance. Donors are increasingly interested in funding welldesigned projects that generate tangible outputs with measurable impact in finite periods of time. In turn, by structuring its research along project lines, CIAT can maintain a highly flexible and dynamic research program that can respond to the expectations and priorities expressed by the CGIAR, CIA T's national and regional research partners, and donors and potential investors in CIA T's overall research programoAs lhe Action Plan was being implemented, projects were identified and developed as centers of activity, resource allocation, and accountability. But, for the sake 01organization and accountability, each project is assigned to the research program or scientific resource group lo which it most contributes.This modus operandi guarantees a high degree of interdependence and fluidity among projects. At the same time, the Center is assured that the sum total of the projects directly contributes to the mandates and objectives of each research program and SRG-and therefore to the overall mission and objectives of CIAT.By organizing research along project lines, CIAT introduced a total budget approach to funding these projects. Budgets for core and complementary projects are integrated, thus enabling staff and management to betler ascertain the real cost of any activity; report expenditures for auditing; identify inefficiencies in resource utilization and constraints on outputs; and assess project performance.CIAT scientists generate outputs related to specific crops and agroecosystems through projects that are \"housed\" in six research programs and five scientific resource groups.Most financial resources are assigned or atlributed lo projects, so that the Center's lotal budget is the sum of resources assigned to al! projects together, with sorne central costs that cannot readily be atlributed lo projects (e.g., administration and maintenance) .With projects as its key operational and budgetary unít, CIAT is able to achieve fuI! transparency and accountability in its priorities, outputs, expenditures, and income. This enables the CGIAR, other donors, and national partners to see clearly how resources are deployed and the purposes for which they are used. Core resources provided by the CGIAR constitute the main part of CIA T's budget. These resources are assigned to projects according to priorities determined with the CGIAR and TAC. These priorities form the backbone of CIA T's project structure and these resources are its lifeblood.But the project structure also enables the Center to attract other donors and investors.Priority is placed on attracting additional funding for outputs that contribute directly to the achievement of CIA Ts core goals within its CGIAR mandate. Complementary funds are also sought to speed up and extend the scope of application of the Center's core outputs (e.g., through regional germplasm networks).Complementary resources can also be used to produce other complementary outputs and services demanded by CIAT partners, especially in Latin America and the Caribbean, where the Center fulfills an ecoregional function. These complementary outputs are closely related to CIAT core outputs and capacities (e.g., training in molecular markers or GIS methods). The resources generated to deliver these outputs allow CIAT to expand the capacity of its scientific resource groups (e.g., through extra visiting scientists or postdoctoral fellows).Thus, CIA Ts project structure enables it to merge funds from a variety of sources into a single total budget. These resources are deployed synergistically to produce an interrelated set of core and complementary outputs. AII outputs derive from CIA Ts core capacities, which expand or contract according to the resources available.The core collection of bean germplasm has moved fully from a development and testing stage to maturity as a research tool. In 1994, evaluations were conducted for seed protein types, tolerance to low P and Mn toxicity, adaptation to water deficit, and temperature response of phenology.The tragic war in Rwanda lead to the Seeds of Hope initiative. This major collaborative effort between lARes, NGOs and foreign aid programs has the duel goals of helping relief efforts provide Rwandan farmers with seed stocks of bean and other crops, while protecting the genetic diversity in the region, and of understanding how genetic diversity is affected by major catastrophes and how diversity should be managed in future relief efforts.Confirming our continued commitment to improvement of bean production through plant breeding, over 15 bean cultivars derived from CIAT materials were released by NARS in 1994.New germplasm of cultivated cassava and Manihot species were incorporated into the world collection this year. Molecular markers were used to confirm putative duplicates in the germplasm collection, suggested by prior morphological and isozyme characterization, resulting in a reduction of the total number of accessions to be maintained in the field gene bank. Two types of molecular markers. RAPDs and RFLPs from DNA probes developed at CIAT, were used to construct the tirst genetic map of cassava, based on their segregation in an intraspecific cross.Fermented cassava starch has proven to be the unique in terms of conferring expansion properties to bakery products. This cassava characteristic could open up important niche markets for starch in dietary and gluten-free products.Progress was made toward understanding the basis of cassava's ability to maintain high photosynthetic rates under conditions of drought and temperature stress. High activity of photosynthetic enzymes and un usual anatomic features, possibly related to xerophytic adaptation, were discovered in two Manihot species.The global cassava needs assessment exercise that was initiated in 1993 has been completed. This study has quantified the major constraints taced by cassava farmers and processors by continent and by ecosystem. This information is in the process of being further reviewed by national program collaborators.In 1994, new accessions with potential for pasture, fodder, soil cover, and erosion barriers were identified for the mid-altitude hillsides, savannas, and forest margins, MCAC and Southeast Asia within the genera Arachís, Cratylía, Centrosema and Brachiaria. 100 accessions of the promising new forage species Arachis pintoi are now available in Brazil, 60 of which are duplicated at CIAT. Superior accessions of Arachis pintoi were identified for the humid tropics, dry season savannas and Southeast Asia.An international workshop was held on the major tropical forage grass genus Brachiaria.Coarse mapping of the apomixis gene was achieved, and sources of resistance to foliar blight were identified.Interspecitic differences were demonstrated in acquisition and utilization of N, P and Ca.Oifferences in Ca acquisition were shown between Brachiaria species. Greater Ca uptake was found to occur in grass-Iegume than grass-alone pastures.Funding was obtained to develop a forage research and development network in SE Asia.A watershed event during 1994-early '95 was the creation Ot an association ot private and public-sector rice institutions, farmer cooperatives and industries to fund international irrigated rice research. The Fondo Latinoamericano de Arroz de Riego (FLAR) is the first organization in the developing world self-tund international agricultural research on a tood crop. It should place Latín American rice improvement on a more sustainable long-term path, since the benefits derived trom research will now teed the research itself, as direct beneficiaries take its control and responsibility. CIAT was instrumental in the process that gave life to FLAR.A major triennial meeting took place during 1994, the ..Conterence tor Latin America.\" Jointly coordinated by CIAT and EMBRAPA, the meeting was attended by 297 particípants from 21 countries. A course-workshop was also held at CIAT to share CIA T's knowledge and expertise on rice anther culture, and to stimulate closer collaboratíon between tissue culturists and breeders.The preparation of cONA libraríes and the molecular characterízation of rice hoja blanca virus has led to the design of novel virus-resistant strategies to genetically engineer commercially-grown rice cultivars.We developed a methodology to derive economic thresholds for multi-species weed infestations in direct-seeded rice, with options to remove some site specificity constraints.Such thresholds are the key to unlock IPM for weeds in rice, and could reduce herbicide applications by up to 30%.HILLSIDES. Spatial autocorrelation of soil chemical properties across contrasting land uses strat~fied by environment showed autocorrelation for many properties, notably C and Al and micronutrients across contrasting land use types. The results of this study will be used to define representative properties for different land use mapping units.A prototype, decision-support system tor land use planning in the hillsides was tested, linking farmer decision-making with crop models which simulate the effect of farmer decisions. Progress was made in assessing the applicability with available data of simulation models to assess degradation processes, such as run-off and nitrate leaching.The effects ot changes in land use on degradation processes at the watershed level have been modeled for a pilot catchment area, determining consequences of plot-Ievel effects for degradation at the watershed scale. This research will provide tools to be tested with CIPASLA, the local consortium of institutions in Rio Ovejas, Colombia. CIPASLA conducted joint projects testing participatory approaches to soil conservation which showed a five-fold increase in adoption of conservation barriers in the pilot micro catchment area in Río Ovejas due to farmer participation in the adaptive research.A case study of farmer decision-making in the Atlantic littoral hillsides of Honduras, showed that itinerant agriculture was more sustainable than previously believed. Forestto-pasture conversion was more a consequence of the low productivity of dairy farming in the lowlands, which leads to the colonization of steep slopes for pasture. Local operational committees, the project's mechanism for interinstitutional collaboration in watershed sites, were set up in Honduras, and Nicaragua. Training continued to national programs in Brazil, Ecuador, Bolivia and Peru.TROPICAL LOWLANDS. An adoption study of pasture-based technologies in the Colombian savanna showed that 98% of sample farmers had planted improved pastures, covering 17% of the surveyed area. As natural increase in herd size occurs, farmers appear to be accepting improved grass pastures as an alternative to overgrazing.Extensive studies were conducted during 1994 on the floristic composition of native savanna, which constitutes the main (>70%) land use form of the regíon. These data have been georeferenced, and extensive soil and plant tisslJe analyses were conducted. On the whole. 173 plant species were identified belonging to 40 different families.An excellent indicator of positive changes in the biological properties of savanna oxisols appears to be soil microbial biomass. to the extent that nutrient cycling is very tightly linked to its turnover rate. In fact, P flux through microbial biomass, at least under grasslegume pastures (12-34 kg ha-1 year -\\ indicates that this could be a major pathway of P cycling in these soils.Investigations of deep-rooted germplasm that can effectively sequester carbon at depth, and possibly affect the exchange of other greenhouse gases as well. showed exciting results. Introduced grass and grass-Iegume pastures were found to make a major contribution to soil organic matter to a depth of at least 100 cm in both on station and on-1arm experiments. As a minimum it was estimated that a three year old B. dictyoneura pasture contributes 30 t C ha-1 in 3 years, and that the addition of a legume significantly increases the amount of carbon sequestered. A C-sequestration workshop took place with the participation of several NARs and international institutions, to develop an interinstitutional project on the subject for submission to potential donors.LAND MANAGEMENT. CIATwas invited to become, and is now, one of a selected few \"UNEP Collaboratíng Centres for International Environmental Assessment, Reporting and Forecasting\". This has already opened new channels 01 collaboration such as wíth the Dutch RIVM.The CIAT climate database covers the whole 01 the world tropics. It has been built over the last 17 years and now contains long term climatic normals for 9,864 stations in Latín America, 5,536 in Africa and 3,721 in Asia. Recently it was given a major update, adding data for almost 2,000 additional stations. Updating and expansion of the GIS hardware and software as well as the database software continued in 1994.Two Wild/Leitz model200 dual frequency P code Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) systems were acquired. These will allaw the Unít to perform control surveys tar satellite imagas and digital ortho-phatagraphy, as well as detailed project mapping.For details of the financial years 1993, 1994, 1995, and the 1996 'funding request, see Tables 1 to 17 at end of publication.1994 Financial Year Complementary funding amounted to $4,747,000 (see Table 2). When taken into consideration that in 1994, an amount of $1,918,000 of complementary activities was incorporated into the core program, it is evident that in 1994, funding for complementary activities was $1,877,000 (39%) higher than in the previous year.The 1995 CGIAR-approved core funding level for CIAT is $27,800,000 1 • Together with indirect cost recovery of $601,000, total availability of funds is projected at $28,401,000.With core expenditures projected at $30,501,000, CIAT anticipates a deficit of $2,100,000.As mentioned in the introduction, the deficit projected here represents that portio n of the costs to CIAT of the revaluation of the Colombian Peso which CIAT is unable to absorbo A special case is being presented to the Finance Committee to help CIAT deal with this projected shortfall.The allocation of resources in 1995 is as shown in the attached tables.In 1995, CIAT expects to execute complementary activities amounting to some $5,160,000. A number of special projects have been, or are in the process of being submitted to donor agencies. Depending on the approval rate of these projects, additional complementary funds will become available in the course of 1995.1996 Request $31,709,000Self-generated income, including indirect cost recovery, is projected at $609,000. As per the TAC recommendation, income from CGIAR donors is projected at $27,800,000. Therefore, 1996 expenditures are projected to be $3,300,000 above income. This difference represents that portion of the cost to CIAT of the revaluation of the Colombian Peso which CIAT is unable to absorbo A special case will be presented to the Finance Committee to assist CIAT in dealing with this extra inflation cost.Irrigated Rice in the Latin American Region. The Board of Trustees of CIAT accepted a proposal by Management to seek to re-conceptualize the form by which the irrigated rice sector of Latín America would be served by technology generation efforts at the regional and internationallevel. This entails the organization of the rice producing sector of the region (including the public, semi-public and private sector) into a regionwide cooperative endeavor that will provide a priority-setting mechanisms for rice research, as well as financial resources for the execution of the technology generation efforts. CIA T's participation in this effort is limited to providing an organizing mechanism to catalyze and promote the initiative. This mechanisrn is represented by a positíon for a senior scientist with a background in economics, rice production and business development to catalyze and promote the irrigated rice initiative.This organizing mechanism is proposed to be financed by eliminating from core support a senior staff position for irrigated rice breeding.The EPMR of CIAT has paid close attention, and provided strong support to CIAT's efforts in providing leadership for an integrated joint venture with the Latin American rice industry and to develop management experience in implementing long term linkages with the prívate sector.Currently existing contracts with special project donors amount to $2,944,000 of complementary activities. This sum is expected to increase in the course of 1995 and 1996 as additional special project-funded activities come on stream. SoR water, and nutrient managemenl .\"1' .11 .. M\" .934. 1993, 1994, 1995, and Projection 1996. (. ( • í -=!:::::::= . . . . ,","tokenCount":"3801"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1232360469.json b/data/part_2/1232360469.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7149c2e2fee72b5cd403426279001fac1842a80e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1232360469.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d92c1daa4c499af2f9f2c4bd003311c4","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/85a56fa4-2926-4c61-bfbd-b06eb65d176a/retrieve","id":"-25879263"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"8efacf52-dd47-4224-bcc4-d0fdea8375b7","pagecount":"6","content":"A griculture is by far the largest human use of water. It uses 70% of global freshwater withdrawals, mainly for irrigation to supplement water for rainfed crops and livestock. Natural variability in rainfall and temperature means that, in many places, access to freshwater is already unpredictable. How climate change will alter this 'natural' variability is the subject of considerable study.For many millions of smallholder farmers, reliable access to water is the difference between plenty and famine. The classic response is to store water behind dams or in tanks or ponds when it is abundant and where it can be conserved for times of shortage. Water storage spurs economic growth and helps alleviate poverty by making water available when and where it is needed. Today, many developing countries, even those with abundant water, have insufficient water storage capacity.Inadequate storage leaves farmers vulnerable to the vagaries of climate. Ethiopia is one such example. Ethiopian farmers are heavily reliant on rainfed subsistence agriculture. The lack of storage infrastructure means farmers have limited ability to cope with droughts and floods. These limitations are estimated to cost the economy one-third of its growth potential. The Ethiopian case is a good illustration of the urgent need for appropriate investments in water storage to increase agricultural productivity and to ensure that farmers have options for adjusting to the coming climate changes.of significant social and environmental costs and have adversely affected poor people. For most of the world's large dams, downstream economic and environmental consequences have been given little attention in design and operation. Most dams were constructed with the emphasis on maximizing the economic returns from the dam itself, with little understanding of the long-term consequences of changing river flow patterns downstream.Over the last 40 years, there has been an increasing understanding of how dams modify riparian ecosystems. Using dams to regulate flow has been found to cause serious degradation of ecosystems and the natural resources and services upon which many people living downstream of the dam depend. Concerns about the negative social and environmental impacts led to reduced investment in large dams in the 1990s. More recently, there has been a reevaluation of the role of dams and though the controversy continues, investment in large dams in Africa and Asia is increasing again.Other forms of water storage and water use can also have negative environmental impacts, affecting river ecosystems and wetlands. Pumping from aquifers lowers the water table and can reduce dry-season flows and spring discharges and can cause wetlands to dry up. Even storage in small tanks and in the soil can modify flow regimes if scaled up over large areas.Dams are one of the many surface and belowsurface water storage options for agriculture. Others include natural wetlands, water stored in the soil, and rainwater-harvesting ponds. Historically, irrigation depended heavily on water in rivers or naturally stored in lakes, floodplains, and wetlands.Groundwater provides much of the water used for irrigation. In India, more than 19 million pumps withdraw 230 km 3 of groundwater annually. In Spain, northern China, and California, crop production is almost entirely dependent on groundwater. All groundwater originates as rainfall that percolates down through the soil into aquifers. In some places, the groundwater in these aquifers came from rains that fell many thousands of years ago when rainfall patterns were very different. Libya, for example, is currently exploiting vast reserves of water stored beneath the Sahara Desert, where almost no rain falls today. Water from these ancient aquifers is sometimes called 'fossil water.' Pumping fossil water is like pumping oil; once used, there is no more. Even where groundwater is recharged, if pumping exceeds the rate of recharge, water levels will fall until the aquifer is exhausted or until it becomes uneconomical to pump. This can be devastating for poor farmers as can already be seen in a number of places, including Gaza, northern China, and California. Artificial recharge of groundwater aquifers is possible (for example, using recharge ponds) and is an element of water storage that should not be neglected. Some effective methods for storing water are also relatively simple and cheap, bearing in mind that in some regions such as Ethiopia, even simple ponds and tanks are beyond the financial means of the poorest. Ponds and tanks built by individual households or communities can store water collected from microcatchments and rooftops. Individual ponds and tanks may be small in volume, but, in some places, this water is vital to supplement domestic water supplies, household gardens, rainfed crops, and livestock.Of all the choices available for water storage, large dams are the most controversial. Many large dams contribute significantly to economic development. However, it is also true that inappropriate construction and operation have been the cause The importance of ecosystem services is now widely recognized. Providing water to support those services is increasingly viewed as an essential use of water, along with water for agriculture, industry, and domestic use. In many countries, national legislation now makes explicit provisions to safeguard flows in rivers to protect the environment and support basic human needs.Different types of water storage also have a unique carbon footprint. Tropical hydropower reservoirs produce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the decomposition of flooded vegetation and primary production. Under certain circumstances, these GHGs may exceed that of comparable fossil fuel power stations. Pumping from deep groundwater aquifers takes a lot of energy, usually in the form of electricity or diesel fuel. IWMI's partners and research collaborators estimate that the groundwater irrigation in India accounts for about 4% of the country's total GHG emissions.Population growth, rising incomes, and urbanization are just some of the drivers increasing the demand for water in cities and industry. Part of the problem in supplying these needs is that the pattern of demand is seldom the same for all users. For example, hydropower demand is more or less constant through the year with diurnal variations, whereas irrigation water is needed only at specific times of the year. For flood control, water levels in a reservoir need to be lowered, while irrigation requires that a reservoir be kept as full as possible. These differences are often a source of competition for, and conflict over, stored water. To reduce conflicts, it is important that everyone with a stake in the storage (including local people) participate in decisionmaking processes pertaining to the water and its use.Climate change will increase rainfall variability and average temperatures, affecting both the supply and demand side of the irrigation equation. In some areas of the world, annual precipitation will decline, decreasing river flows and groundwater recharge. In other places, total precipitation may increase but it will fall over shorter periods with greater intensity so that dry spells are longer. Higher temperatures will increase evaporation so that crops will use more water. Although the effects will vary from place to place, farmers will generally need to adapt to less soil moisture and higher evaporation. This means larger volumes and more frequent use of supplemental water. All storage options are potentially vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. For example, less rainfall and longer dry periods mean that soil water conservation measures may fail to increase soil moisture sufficiently for crops. Groundwater recharge may be reduced if infiltration decreases. Many nearcoast aquifers will be at risk from saltwater intrusion as a result of sea level rise. Ponds, tanks, and reservoirs may not fill enough to support agriculture or may be at risk of damage from more extreme floods. Larger, more intense floods could also cause catastrophic large dam failures.The externalities created by different storage types are also likely to be affected by climate change. For example, water storage tanks, ponds, and reservoirs create breeding grounds for mosquitoes and can lead to increases in malaria and other water-borne diseases. The higher temperatures expected with climate change may worsen the situation. Similarly, adverse environmental impacts, arising from changes in the flow regimes of rivers, may be exacerbated by climate change. Factors such as these must be considered in the future planning, design, and operation of water storage schemes.With increased uncertainty, higher demand, and greater competition, water storage is only one component of a multipronged approach for adapting agriculture to climate change. Future water resource management must also include reallocation of water between users and increasing water productivity wherever possible. There is no doubt that providing more and diverse physical storage infrastructure is an imperative for securing reliable supplies of water for agriculture and other uses.Each type of storage has its own niche in terms of technical feasibility, socioeconomic sustainability, impact on health and environment, and institutional requirements. Each needs to be considered carefully within the context of its geographic, cultural, and political location. With so much uncertainty in climate change scenarios, the best option is to focus on flexibility in storage systems, wherever possible combining a variety of types to take advantage of their unique characteristics.Poor farmers already struggle to cope with changing and unpredictable weather patterns and this will be worsened by climate change. As climate change becomes a greater threat to water systems and agriculture, variety in the types of water storage systems used will provide an important mechanism for adaptation. However, the types of storage must be tailored to the specific needs and socioeconomic conditions of an area. Planners need to start taking climate change into account when they design and manage integrated storage systems. ","tokenCount":"1559"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1247716136.json b/data/part_2/1247716136.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3d6a254ddc0540ad670928b0c38971bf244f8fad --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1247716136.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4b6765a44a8f91a35ff8cb1e07034300","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/4bacaefd-b923-4c75-9745-efe8ffe59aaa/retrieve","id":"1182358987"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"aaa019a3-8327-46ee-8ef3-3b3ee2e56b0e","pagecount":"76","content":"The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO, IFAD, WFP or CGIAR.Published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations the International Fund for Agricultural Development the World Food Programme and the CGIAR Rome, 2023 Guidelines for measuring gender transformative change in the context of food security, nutrition and sustainable agriculture SECTION 3 A step-by-step process to develop gender transformative change indicatorsStep 1: Create an impact statementStep 2: Identify key challengesStep 3: Identify which groups need to change and the sphere(s) of influenceStep 4: Develop outcome statements Since 2019, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) and the World Food Programme (WFP) have been implementing the Joint Programme on Gender Transformative Approaches for Food Security, Improved Nutrition and Sustainable Agriculture (JP GTA) in collaboration with and through financial support from the European Union. The JP GTA contributes to the implementation of the European Union's Gender Equality Strategy and gender action plans, and in particular to Gender Action Plan III, 1 which has intersectionality and gender transformative, rights-based approaches as its main principles.The JP GTA seeks to assist in the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2 (Zero Hunger) and SDG 5 (Gender Equality) by supporting efforts to address the root causes of gender inequalities and trigger transformative change processes that lead to gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls in their households, communities and society -and ultimately, the improvement of the livelihoods of all women and men. The programme supports the United Nations Rome-based Agencies (RBAs) -FAO, IFAD and WFP -in adopting gender transformative approaches (see Box 1) in their policy dialogues, programmes, working modalities and institutional mechanisms, while enhancing their collaboration on Zero Hunger and Gender Equality.1 See https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/gender-action-plan-iii-towards-gender-equal-world_en BOX 1. What is a gender transformative approach?A gender transformative approach seeks to actively examine, challenge and transform the underlying causes of gender inequalities rooted in discriminatory social institutions. As such, a gender transformative approach aims to address the unequal gendered power relations and discriminatory gender norms, attitudes, behaviours and practices, as well as discriminatory or gender-blind policies and laws, that create and perpetuate gender inequalities. By doing so, it seeks to eradicate the systemic forms of gender-based discrimination by creating or strengthening equitable gender relations and social institutions that support gender equality.One of the core principles underlying the use of a gender transformative approach is that gender transformative change must come from within the communities and societies where this change occurs and cannot be imposed from the outside, including by development or research actors. i This requires setting up processes to obtain insider perspectives to ensure that these are used to inform the design of qualitative and quantitative indicators as well as tools and methods. Here, the role of the research or development actor is to help support ongoing gender transformative change processes, or to stimulate and facilitatetogether with local women and men and relevant stakeholders -these processes. This requires a nuanced understanding of people and place, and an appreciation that the precise process, and associated indicators, will always differ by location.An example of a gender transformative approach is seen in the social and gender research carried out by Cole and colleagues in the Barotse Floodplain in Zambia. This research led to the design of a gender transformative communication tool that was implemented within different fishing communities to encourage critical reflection, planning and action by women and men to improve gender relations and women's empowerment outcomes within the household and community. ii Together, the RBAs offer significant technical expertise and support internationally recognized fora for discussing policy issues related to food security, nutrition and agriculture. The enhanced synergies among the RBAs are important to achieving SDG 2, which lies at the heart of their respective mandates. The three agencies share a common vision of ending hunger and malnutrition through supporting sustainable and inclusive agriculture development and rural transformation, with a particular focus on smallholder farmerswomen and men alike. Working towards the achievement of Gender Equality is seen as fundamental for attaining Zero Hunger as well as the other SDGs. Indeed, this vision is a global imperative and a pivotal element of the 2030 Agenda.Gender transformative approaches have been increasingly recognized as central to achieving sustained progress towards gender equality. However, important knowledge gaps remain in how to appropriately measure gender transformative change within food security and nutrition programmatic interventions. These are partly due to the complex nature of the changes that are sought through gender transformative approaches, which may require the measurement of changes in deep-seated power relations, gender norms, and individual and collective agency.With the aim of enhancing the capacity of the RBAs, the European Union, CGIAR, and other research and development partners to design, implement, monitor and evaluate gender transformative interventions, the JP GTA partnered with the CGIAR GENDER Impact Platform to develop the \"Guidelines for measuring gender transformative change in the context of food security, nutrition and sustainable agriculture\" (hereinafter \"the Guidelines\").The intended audience of the Guidelines includes gender experts and programme specialists seeking to design, implement, monitor and evaluate gender transformative interventions in food security, nutrition and sustainable agriculture programmes and initiatives.The Guidelines were developed through a collaborative process involving the JP GTA and the CGIAR GENDER Impact Platform carried out from January to December 2022. A technical working group was set up to guide the process, comprising the Global Coordinator of the JP GTA, gender programme officers and specialists from the three RBAs, and a group of CGIAR gender researchers. The technical working group met bimonthly over the course of five months to present ideas and consolidate input into the formulation of a draft framework, a glossary of terms and annotated outline of the Guidelines, and to prepare for an expert consultation to collect feedback and discuss the progress made.The expert consultation included a diverse group of scientists, practitioners and project managers from both the Global North and the Global South who were identified and selected by the technical working group. 2 These experts had various kinds of experience in designing, implementing and/or monitoring and evaluating gender transformative programmes or interventions in the context of food security, nutrition and sustainable agriculture. The objectives of the consultation were to: (i) review and discuss the annotated outline of the Guidelines; and (ii) obtain new and critical expert insights on appropriate monitoring and evaluation (M&E) standards for encouraging, supporting and measuring gender transformative change.The consultation identified common challenges faced when assessing the complex area of gender transformative change and the M&E strategies that have proven successful in overcoming them. Experts were also asked to share how they and/or their organizations conceptualize and measure gender transformative change, including the metrics and indicators they use. The expert consultation yielded important insights, which have been incorporated into these Guidelines.The Guidelines build on and complement previous JP GTA knowledge products such as the Gender transformative approaches for food security, improved nutrition and sustainable agriculture -A compendium of fifteen good practices (FAO, IFAD and WFP, 2020) and the Guide to formulating gendered social norms indicators in the context of food security and nutrition (FAO, IFAD and WFP, 2022). 2 The list of experts is available at the JP GTA Coordination Unit.The Guidelines are structured as follows:First, the Guidelines present an overarching framework comprising the key dimensions of gender transformative change and a socioecological model for identifying spheres of influence within which gender transformative change can be measured.Second, the Guidelines present some important methodological points to consider when attempting to measure gender transformative change.Third, the Guidelines provide guidance steps to formulate qualitative and quantitative indicators of gender transformative change, within different spheres of influence. Sample outcome indicators are provided. • The Guidelines provide helpful guidance on how to capture incremental changes along pathways towards empowering women and achieving SDG 5 (Gender Equality).• An experienced gender expert and M&E specialist are needed to develop gender transformative change indicators. Adopting a participatory approach with strategic partners, including programme participants and other stakeholders supporting the programme, is advised.SECTION 1 A framework for measuring gender transformative changeThe concept of gender transformative change is not new, although its formulation has changed over time. McArthur et al. (2022) trace the emergence of discourses on social transformation towards gender equality back to first-wave feminism in the 1800s. However, most conceptual and empirical work underlying current understandings of gender transformative change commenced in the 1970s. See Annex 1 for a brief history on the conceptualization of gender transformative change.At the core of measuring gender transformative change is the understanding that discriminatory social institutions and unequal power relations need to change, and that there is value in assessing how deep and enduring any changes have been to date (European Union, 2020; Kantor and Apgar, 2013;Morgan, 2014;Hillenbrand et al., 2015;Mullinax, Hart and Garcia, 2018). Social institutions that embed and (re)produce unequal power relations between women and men in a circular reinforcing process are the root causes of gender inequality (Cerise and Francavilla, 2012). These institutions comprise formal and informal rules and norms that organize social, political and economic relations (Carter, 2014) -or \"the underlying rules of the game\" (North, 1990, p. 3). The transformation of social institutions to make them more gender equitable fosters more cooperative forms of power and relationships, affirming people's capabilities, aspirations, critical awareness and dignity (Hillenbrand et al., 2015). These multiple forms of power are linked to individual and collective agency, which are at the heart of the empowerment process (van Eerdewijk et al., 2017;Kabeer, 1999).We can therefore broadly conceptualize gender transformative change as a process comprising the following key dimensions (DeMerritt-Verrone and Kellum, 2021): agency / power relations / social institutions (Figure 1).Agency is the ability to define one's goals and act upon them (Kabeer, 1999). It refers to \"the capacity for purposive action, the ability to pursue goals, express voice and influence and make decisions free from violence\" (van Eerdewijk et al., 2017, p. 14). Building agency entails building confidence, consciousness, aspirations and self-esteem, as well as improving knowledge, skills and capabilities (DeMerritt-Verrone and Kellum, 2021). Enhancing critical consciousness involves the \"process of changing the way people see and experience their worlds that can raise awareness of inequalities, stimulate indignation about injustice and generate the impetus to act together to change society\" (Cornwall, 2016, p. 344).Agency is exercised at the individual and group levels via cooperative relations and collective action (Elias et al., 2021), and can be expressed in positive and negative ways. It can include forms of negotiation, bargaining, manipulation, resistance and subversion (Kabeer, 1999), and encompasses \"the meaning, motivation, and purpose that individuals bring to their actions\" or their sense of agency (Kabeer, 2005, pp. 14-15). There are several subdimensions of agency (Mosedale et al., 2005) that can be considered when measuring gender transformative change (Figure 2). Power is something that each person has, but may be able to exercise to different degrees, whereas power relations are between two or more people who may have equal or varying degrees of power. Unequal gender relations are the expression of inequitable power relations and are considered the underlying cause of the disempowerment of women and girls (van Eerdewijk et al., 2017). Table 1 provides definitions of different expressions of power. It is within these gender relations that women face systemic disadvantages in exercising choice and expressing their voice (van Eerdewijk et al., 2017). Gender relations are embedded in patriarchal societies, where women and girls routinely experience discrimination, marginalization and subordination. Within the institutional arenas of the family, community, market and state (van Eerdewijk et al., 2017), the choices and voices of women and girls are constrained by unequal power relations.While power can be oppressive (i.e. power over another), it can also be a means of transforming one's own life and those of others (VeneKlasen and Miller, 2002). Challenging unequal power relations involves developing strategies to move away from inequitable power over relationships among individuals and groups towards building more positive expressions of power, including power within, power to, and power with in ways that help to catalyse systemic change (Pansardi, 2012;Rowlands, 1997;Allen, 1999;Gammage, Kabeer and van der Meulen Rodgers, 2016;Cornwall, 2016;Galiè and Farnworth, 2019).Power over involves using power to repress, force, coerce, discriminate against, corrupt or abuse others. This interpretation of power leads to an understanding of relationships as \"win-lose\" -one side has power and associated benefits, and the other does not.Power over perpetuates inequality, injustice and poverty when individuals or groups of people deny access to key resources like land and health care to others.Patriarchy is a deeply embedded institutional form of power over that systemically discriminates against women and girls.Power within has to do with a person's sense of self-worth and self-knowledge; it concerns the power of an individual and is not relational. Power within involves a person's capacity to imagine and have hope, and affirms the common human search for dignity and fulfilment. This expression of power is considered a starting point for engaging in other positive forms of power.Power to acknowledges the unique potential of every person to shape their lives and world. It involves activating a person's capacity to act (their power within) in the real world.Power with involves finding common ground among shared and different interests and building collective strength. Based on mutual support, solidarity and collaboration, power with can exponentially multiply individual talents and knowledge in a synergetic manner. This expression of power can construct bridges across different interests to promote equitable power relations and strengthen gender equality.Different women, men, girls and boys maintain important relationships with many people across different institutional arenas that can be considered when measuring gender transformative change (van Eerdewijk et al., 2017), such as:• spouses or domestic partners (family) Social institutions consist of both formal and informal rules and norms (Carter, 2014) that are made and remade through people's practices (Berry, 1989), and that change over time. These rules and norms structure how social relations play out in the institutional arenas of the family, community, market and state.• the written constitutions, policies and laws, and rights and regulations that are imposed by governmental and other authorities.• \"unwritten\" social norms, customs, values, traditions and sanctions.Social institutions dictate how agricultural inputs or land get distributed or accessed/owned by women, often in ways that constrain their abilities to communicate and act upon their practical needs and strategic life goals. In this context, both formal and informal institutions frequently interact with each other. For instance, formal policies combined with discriminatory social norms can create barriers to women's involvement in leadership positions within farmers' associations, and can limit women's power to participate in key agricultural and other decisions within their households.By developing their personal and collective agency, women can strengthen their decisionmaking and collective power -and their leadership capacities -to challenge informal and formal institutions to become more equitable (DeMerritt-Verrone and Kellum, 2021), thereby catalysing transformative change processes (van Eerdewijk et al., 2017).There are several subdimensions of social institutions (Mosedale et al., 2005), which reflect the above-mentioned references to formal and informal institutions:• marriage or kinship rules and roles In sum, gender transformative change involves building agency, challenging unequal power relations that disfavour women and girls, and making formal and informal social institutions more gender equitable, which can ultimately lead to more equitable social structures (e.g. macroeconomic structures, governance structures). Changes in the three dimensions of gender transformative change are mutually reinforcing (Figure 1). Increases in individual and collective agency, for example, can bring about changes in power relations among individuals, groups and organizations. Concurrently, changes in power relations can promote changes in formal and informal social institutions and give impetus to individual and collective agency.Changes in social institutions can also create space for individual and collective agency, thereby leading to more equal gender relations. As such, gender transformative change is non-linear, but ultimately, changes in all three dimensions are required to empower women and achieve SDG 5 (Gender Equality).In building a framework for measuring gender transformative change, it is important to determine where a change in agency, power relations and social institutions has occurred. Gender influences social and power relations at different levels, putting women and men in complex relationships within social institutions, which determines their status, power, and the expression of their voice (Cole et al., 2014). As such, gender transformative change should be measured across different levels (micro, meso and macro) or spheres of influence (individual sphere, household sphere, community sphere, etc.).Socioecological models can be used to situate where gender transformative change can occur (for example, see HC3, 2016a). These models are most often used to depict elements of the complex interactions between individual, household, community, organizational and macroenvironmental factors that lead to variation in a specific outcome. Overlapping spheres are used to depict how factors at one level can influence factors at another level. Programmes can then be designed to promote the positive factors and intervene to address the negative factors that influence agricultural, economic, health or other outcomes.These Guidelines use a modified version of a model proposed by Cole et al. (2014), which is similar to the socioecological model proposed by UNFPA, UNICEF and UN Women (2020) to identify gender transformative interventions. 3 Through this socioecological model we highlight where gender transformative change could be measured depending on the focus of a particular gender transformative programme intervention.We describe each sphere of influence in Table 2 and provide some examples of the types of gender transformative changes that could be measured within each sphere. Given that the spheres interact with each other, changes in one sphere influence and are reflected in other spheres. These can also be measured, provided a programme is able to clearly trace and attribute cause-effect relationships between interventions in one sphere and outcomes in another.TA B L E 2 . Spheres of influence where gender transformative change can be measuredFocus is on individual women and men, girls and boys.-Changes in power within are reflected in strengthened individual agency and capacities -confidence, self-esteem, aspirations, awareness of discriminatory social institutions and unequal power relations at different levels, agricultural knowledge, skills, and capabilities.-Evidence of power to act -it is evidenced in action taken upon improved knowledge and capacities, evidence of women and men taking on new roles.-Changes in power within and power to act are reflected in women's and men's attitudes/beliefs on roles and responsibilities in agriculture, food preparation, and ensuring good health and nutrition.Focus is on households, families and intra-household relationships.-Changes in power to act, power with and power over are reflected and measurable in changes in the involvement of household members in making agricultural and other decisions.-Changes in social and gender norms are demonstrated through changes in gender roles and expectations in and outside of agriculture.Focus is on co-inhabitants of (and those providing services within) a bounded geographical space; community decision-making structures and actors active in the community, such as, local agricultural input and other service providers, buyers, cooperatives and farmer associations, women's groups, savings groups, etc.Gender transformative change can be measured in:-Changes in social and gender norms at community level.-Changes in power relations between local people and community decisionmaking spaces and service providers.-Changes in power to act by women's groups to ensure their gender issues are understood and addressed by community decision-makers, farmer associations, savings groups, and other bodies acting on behalf of or representing women and men.-Changes in decision-making powers, leadership positions, and bylaws in cooperatives, farmer associations, and other organizations that promote gender equality.-Changes in power with -evidence that women join women's organizations, savings groups and other organizations representing their gender and other interests.A framework for measuring gender transformative changeFocus is on national and international agricultural research and development organizations (e.g., national agricultural research and extension services), civil society, humanitarian, and other organizations (including national-level associations and cooperatives), and private sector bodies (e.g., buyers and aggregators, processing mills, seed and feed companies, exporters).Gender transformative change can be measured in:-Changes within organizations regarding their workplace and organizational culture and formal policies along with their attitudes about national agricultural development and gender relations, including recognizing women as farmers and economic change agents, and men as allies for change for gender equitable power relations, and as advocates for gender equality.-Changes in power over -changes in how public and private sector provide services to, or develop technologies for, farmers and other value chain actors that consider existing gender needs and norms, and unequal power relations that constrain their uptake of services and technologies.-Changes in power with -changes in the number of women's movements and NGOs advocating for gender equality in agriculture.Focus is on governments, resource partners (e.g., donors), and development banks.Gender transformative change can be assessed against:-Changes from power over to power to act -changes in agricultural development policies or related laws and approaches for implementing agricultural development programs from gender blind to those that aim to help people and their representative organizations to purposefully challenge underlying causes of gender inequality and envision gender transformative outcomes.-Changes in the formal and informal organizational cultures of governments, development banks and resource partners that facilitate actors in other spheres to spark transformative change processes leading to women's empowerment and gender equal outcomes in their own work.-Changes in the norms, attitudes and beliefs of policy and decision makers that influence the creation of gender equal policies, laws, strategies, etc.The framework for measuring gender transformative change is shown in Figure 3. This framework can be applied to any programme that aims to assess gender transformative change within one or across multiple spheres of influence. The JP GTA highlights core areas of gender equality in relation to food security, nutrition and sustainable agriculture where improvements in gender relations, and in the gender equality of social institutions, result in empowering women and increasing their choices, opportunities and rights (Table 3). An assessment of gender transformative change may focus on one or more core areas described in the table (among others) depending on the nature of the intervention activities to be implemented, monitored and evaluated by a programme. 4 These core areas of gender equality are often interrelated and overlapping, with changes in one area sometimes reflecting changes in others.TA B L E 3 . Core areas of gender equality CORE AREA DESCRIPTIONKnowledge and skills (literacy, financial literacy, soft skills and technical knowledge), and access to information.Access to and control over natural productive resources and services, such as land, water, livestock, fisheries, forestry resources, seeds, fertilizers, tools and technology (including information and communication technologies, or infrastructure and advisory/extension services).Access to formal employment and a decent wage; means of earning an independent personal income; markets and value chains; financial services; social protection; informal employment; ownership of and control over assets (financial, housing, etc.).Ability to make own choices and act upon them, including self-esteem, selfefficacy and aspirations.Recognition, reduction and redistribution of unpaid care and domestic work.Equal participation in decision-making at household level -over issues such as mobility, economic activity, income, production and nutrition -as well as in the community and other public spheres at regional and national levels.Capacity to organize; equal representation and leadership in formal and informal bodies and organizations and institutions at community, regional and national levels; capacity to negotiate, lead, express opinions and voice demands.Decision-making on family planning, contraception, marriage partner choice and marrying age.Freedom from: living with fear; physical, sexual and/or emotional violence and harmful practices; restrictions on mobility. Intersectionality refers to how different social identities, such as gender, socioeconomic status, age, ethnicity, geographical location, marital status and physical abilities, intersect to shape experiences of discrimination and oppression (Crenshaw, 1989). Viewing gender equality through an intersectional lens acknowledges that women and men are not binary categories, nor are their experiences homogenous within a given gender. These experiences will vary depending on their social position within the community (e.g. as a wealthy woman/ man from a dominant caste or ethnic group, a poor or widowed woman/man, a young wife/ husband in an extended family, or a rural woman/man). Thus, when developing indicators of gender transformative change and designing M&E systems, it is important to consider how gender intersects with other social identities and axes of power. For example, an assessment of normative changes related to the social acceptability of women's remunerated work outside the home might consider differences among younger and older women, women from different ethnic groups, women with disabilities, or the experiences of women in different forms of marital arrangements (e.g. monogamous versus polygynous, single/ widowed versus married) to determine whether and how these particular gender norms are changing.The social identities that are most salient for shaping discrimination and reinforcing inequality will vary across contexts. During the design phase and when developing the M&E system, each programme should determine which social identities are important to consider for the measurement of gender transformative change in a specific context.Indicators are frequently formulated by programme staff, or are selected from resources produced by past initiatives. As a result, these types of indicators are developed using outsider perspectives. Outsider perspectives typically shape the formulation of indicators (and of programmes themselves) and outcomes expected by the funding or implementing organization. As such, many indicators do not necessarily incorporate the perspectives of the target participants, such as individual women and men, community organizations, and other stakeholders.Hence it is important that M&E systems create opportunities for programme participants and other relevant stakeholders to define gender transformative change from their perspectives and inform the design of gender transformative change indicators based on the changes they wish to monitor. For example, indicators developed or informed by insiders have been used to address local conceptualizations of empowerment in different countries.These Guidelines provide some examples of the many ways to incorporate insider perspectives when designing indicators. One example is presented in Box 2; for others, consult the tools and methods for integrating insider perspectives in research (Annex 2). One recommended approach for indicator development is the SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound) approach, which is valuable for both quantitative and qualitative indicators. ii Another approach, SPICED, iii provides a useful framework for including stakeholders specifically for the development of robust and meaningful indicators. This approach (see full definition below) is qualitative, and allows participants to define change in their own words. It helps to foster shared accountability between stakeholders and aims to encourage ongoing learning and improvement. The principles of the SPICED approach are characterized as follows:• Subjective: Community members have experiences that are unique and can provide insights to the project's understanding of gender transformative change. These insights can vary from place to place.• Participatory: Indicators and objectives need to be developed together by all stakeholders.• Interpreted and communicable: Insider-informed indicators may mean different things to different stakeholders, so they need to be communicated according to shared denominators.• Cross-checked and compared: The validity of assessments needs to be cross-checked, by comparing different objectives/indicators and progress with different methods.• Empowering: The process of identifying indicators is empowering, and helps participants reflect on their changes.• Diverse and disaggregated: Indicators from different intersections of the population are sought.•Step 1: Identify and engage stakeholder groups and community researchers.•Step 2: Understand the local context, issues, barriers and opportunities for change.•Step 3: Identify informational needs and interests.• Programmes should develop outcome indicators to showcase how certain activities or social change innovations can help build agency and support changes in unequal power relations and discriminatory social institutions. It is useful to develop \"progress markers\" to help identify the incremental changes that appear to be contributing to gender transformative change processes.Gender transformative change takes time to achieve, with rapid progress in some spheres and dimensions, and slower changes in others. Measuring incremental changes allows programmes to see how successful they are in facilitating and supporting gender transformative change processes over time, instead of only examining end-points. It is thus important to measure \"catalytic\" changes that lead to longer-term change, while at the same time developing indicators or proxies for slower-moving processes of change that can be tracked more easily (Mullinax, Hart and Garcia, 2018). One possible example of a catalytic change would be a change from gender-blind to gender-responsive policies and by-laws for setting up and supporting cooperatives and farmers' associations. Progress markers can also help assess small incremental changes on the path towards catalytic change (Mullinax, Hart and Garcia, 2018). An incremental change could be an increase in resource-poor married women's knowledge and skills regarding good agricultural practices as well as in their overall confidence, which could lead to increased involvement in agricultural production decisions within their households. Measuring these changes is important, even if it is only possible to capture a portion of the whole change process at any given time.Gender transformative changes can occur in both negative and positive directions -even simultaneously, across different dimensions of change. For example, an intervention designed to help increase women's decision-making power in agricultural cooperatives could lead to reduced involvement of women in food or cash crop production at household level, due to increased work and time burdens operating at the community level. Therefore, measures to examine unintended outcomes are additionally needed.Programmes should consider developing a mix of qualitative and quantitative indicators. Qualitative indicators, by gathering the views and perceptions of different people, can enable programmes to report on how and why gender norms have changed over the course of an intervention (i.e. to explain the \"why\" behind the processes of change). In turn, quantitative indicators can provide complementary information on changes in prevalence and patterns of gender norms over time.Measuring gender transformative change is not per se any more or less costly than measuring other types of processes or outcomes. Nonetheless, estimates of sample size, cost, and time required to carry out surveys and qualitative assessments should be made at the start of any research or M&E process, to ensure the indicators developed within programme teams match the overall research objectives and available resources. Where there are limited budget and human resources to implement a survey, for example, programme teams may wish to design a smaller study at the start or end of a programme cycle using qualitative indicators. For impact assessments, both baseline and endline (and ideally midline) surveys are important to conduct. Hence, having a significant budget and human resources for carrying out these M&E activities is a precondition to enable these surveys to be carried out.It is now recognized that many programmes that intended to empower women have only reached or benefited them in limited ways (Lawless et al., 2019;Johnson et al., 2018). To address this, the \"reach-benefit-empower\" framework (Johnson et al., 2018) was devised to help planners distinguish between reach, benefit and empower strategies and measurement. Kleiber et al. (2019) then added \"transform\" to the framework to address interventions aiming to transform discriminatory social institutions and unequal power relations. Table 4 highlights differences between \"reach\", \"benefit\", \"empower\" and \"transform\" objectives, strategies and indicators. In all cases, women and men with specific intersectional identities can be identified and worked with.TA B L E 4 . From \"reach\" to \"transform\": associations between programme objectives, strategies and indicatorsReach women as well as men as project participants.Inviting women to participate; reducing barriers to women's participation; using quota system for training events.Number or proportion of women and men participating in project activities (training, extension advice, etc.).Deliver access to resources and benefits to women and men. Prior to the development of the change indicators and the implementation of these five steps, it is expected that the programme team will have carried out a thorough intersectional gender analysis to inform the formulation of the programme or policy intervention. This analysis should pay particular attention to the identification of the sources (or root causes) of gender inequalities, including a social norms assessment 5 to identify and understand the social norms that influence specific behaviours that are leading to gender gaps and inequality.The intersectional gender analysis should also examine differences in constraints and opportunities of men, women, boys and girls, as well as other intersecting and compounding forms of discrimination based on Indigenous identity, religion, ethnicity, disability status, age, socioeconomic status, health, and marital or migration status.F I G U R E 4 . All the examples presented are meant to be illustrative in terms of the different dimensions that could be relevant in each context, and in the number of ways the achievement of the outcomes could be measured. Importantly, gender transformative change is better understood when various indicators and dimensions are considered, as no single indicator in isolation should be taken as evidence of gender transformative change. It should be noted that indicator examples are perhaps more suitable for monitoring purposes, but can also be consulted when designing impact evaluations.The proposed step-by-step process can guide the development of a theory of gender transformative change (see Cole et al., 2014) within a given programme, or can be integrated as an impact pathway in a larger programme theory of change. Staff can decide and adapt the application of this process according to the stage of the programme within its overall cycle, though as previously noted, it is recommended that the indicator development process be planned from the design stage onwards.Some complementary resources for measuring gender transformative change are presented in Annex 2 that programmes can consult during the indicator design process. See Annex 5 for a review of select literature on measuring gender transformative change and on related indicators.STEP 1Create an impact statement• Use the core areas of gender equality to help formulate the impact statement Step 1• Link challenges to key dimensions and subdimensions of gender-transformative change • Specify the other social identities that intersect with genderIdentify who needs to change and the sphere(s) of influence• Specify the other social identities that intersect with gender• Associate them with the key challenge and dimensions/ subdimensionsSECTION 3Determine the longer-term impacts that your gender transformative research or development programme is expected to contribute to, clearly identifying who is intended to benefit from your programme and in what way. The assumption is that a gender transformative research or development programme will already have this knowledge at hand, or will have already carried out a study to determine the intended beneficiaries. Make sure to pay attention to other social identities that intersect with gender.Thinking about the gender transformative change you wish to contribute to in the longer term will help you to identify and/or formulate related indicators of shorter-term change in subsequent steps.Use the core areas of gender equality to help formulate an impact statement.See Figure 5 for assistance with the key parts to include in an impact statement. STEP 1Identify the underlying (or root) causes of gender inequality (i.e. the key challenges or problems) that your programme wishes to address to achieve the intended impacts. Again, the assumption is that a gender transformative research or development programme will already have this knowledge, or will have already carried out a study to identify the underlying causes.Link the key challenges to the dimensions of gender transformative change (i.e. agency, power relations, and formal and informal social institutions) that the programme should focus on.Thereafter, determine the subdimensions of agency and formal and informal social institutions and the important relationships on which the programme will focus (see Section 1). Identify which groups need to change and the sphere(s) of influenceDetermine which groups' behaviours, attitudes or beliefs create the key challenges to bringing about women's empowerment and gender equality outcomes. These groups become the focus (i.e. target) of the gender transformative research or development programme. They may (or may not) include the people or groups identified in your impact statement (Step 1), but also others who contribute to sustaining gender inequalities. In addition, identify which sphere(s) of influence these groups operate within.Choose the specific groups whose behaviours, attitudes and beliefs will be targeted by the programme, and which sphere(s) of influence (i.e. individual, household, community, organizational and macroenvironmental) the groups primarily operate in. Individual, household and community STEP 3Develop outcome statements specifying what each target group could do differently to overcome the key challenges identified in Step 2. Remember to focus on the key dimensions (agency, power relations, and formal and informal social institutions) and their subdimensions when defining each statement. Indicate the time frame and possible incremental changes that could lead to achieving the outcomes.The use of participatory methods to obtain insider perspectives of target groups and other local stakeholders are critical here when determining the specific changes required to achieve each desired outcome. Outcome 1 -Resource-poor married women gain the skills and confidence to make decisions on crop production and sales within the household.Outcome 2 -Men in resource-poor women´s households recognize women´s skills and value their contribution in decisions about crop production and sales.Outcome 1 -At month 6: Resource-poor married women increase their knowledge on good agricultural practices, marketing their produce, negotiations and bargaining, as well as learning overall confidencebuilding skills.-At year 1: Resource-poor married women are beginning to use good agricultural practices, better understand potential output markets and how to engage with traders, and practice their negotiation/ bargaining skills.Outcome 2 -At year 1: Men in resource-poor women´s households acknowledge women's market knowledge and their contributions to the implementation of good agricultural practices.-At year 2: Men in resource-poor women´s households recognize the value of women´s capacities and contributions and involve their spouses in production and marketing decisions. -Percentage of resource-poor married women who think that people in the community would approve of women taking decisions on crop production and sales (injunctive norm*)Outcome 2 -Percentage of men in resource-poor households who involve their spouses in decisions about crop production and sales -Percentage of men in resource-poor households who think that women should take decisions on crop production and sales on their own (descriptive norm*)-Percentage of men in resource-poor households who agree that most people in the community would speak positively of men who involve their spouses in decisions about production and marketing of crops (injunctive norm*)Outcome 1 -Resource-poor married women's perspectives on skills learned and confidence gained, and how these have influenced their decisionmaking capacityOutcome 2 -Resource-poor men's views on the importance of involving their spouses in decisions about crop production and sales STEP 5The significance of gender transformative approaches in promoting lasting change towards gender equality and women's empowerment has gained growing recognition in the last decade. These approaches emerge as an alternative and a complement to more traditional gender-aware approaches that have largely focused on addressing the symptoms of gender inequalities without paying sufficient attention to their structural causes. With the goal of achieving sustainable and transformative impacts, gender transformative approaches seek to eradicate systemic forms of gender-based discrimination and to create or strengthen gender relations and social institutions that support gender equality and women's empowerment.These Guidelines have presented an overarching framework for measuring gender transformative change in the context of food security, nutrition and sustainable agriculture.The framework comprises three key dimensions (agency, power relations and social institutions) and a socioecological model for identifying spheres of influence within which gender transformative change can be measured. The Guidelines have also brought attention to other important issues to consider when implementing the framework and when developing context-specific indicators of gender transformative change, such as the incorporation of insider perspectives and consideration for intersectional forms of discrimination. Agency: Agency refers to the ability to define one's goals and act upon them (Kabeer, 1999). Discriminatory social institutions: Discriminatory social institutions consist of formal and informal laws, social norms and practices that restrict or exclude women and consequently curtail their access to rights, justice, resources and empowerment opportunities (OECD, 2019).Dominant/restrictive/toxic masculinities: These masculinities confine men to their traditional role as the dominant gender group, undermining women's empowerment and gender equality (adapted from OECD, 2021).Empowerment: Empowerment is the process of expanding an individual's ability to make strategic life choices in a context where this ability was previously denied (Kabeer, 1999).Feminist research: Both feminist and gender transformative research are concerned with gender as an axis of power. In particular, feminist research has closely examined the fundamental role of research in creating knowledge and power systems. Feminist methodologies seek to challenge traditional approaches to research to rebalance power, redefine the participants as experts, ensure a dedication to ethics and acknowledge all research as value-laden instead of objective (IDRC, 2018).Gender: Gender refers to the roles, behaviours, activities and attributes that a given society at a given time considers appropriate for men and women (WHO, 2023).Genderaccommodating interventions acknowledge that women and men, on the basis of their gender, have specific needs, roles, opportunities and constraints. Interventions work around (i.e. accommodate) existing gender dynamics, norms and roles, but do not challenge them. This leaves the system which creates gender inequalities untouched, allowing it to continuously replicate inequalities.These consist of gender-aware policies and programmes that examine and address the set of economic, social and political roles, responsibilities, rights, entitlements, obligations and power relations associated with being male and female, as well as the dynamics between and among men and women, boys and girls (IGWG, 2017).In these interventions, gender (in terms of the differentiated and intersectional experiences of women, men, boys and girls) is not considered in the research project, not even in its conceptualization or its rationale (Oxfam, 2019). The interventions ignore the set of economic, social and political roles, rights, entitlements, responsibilities and obligations associated with being male and female as well as the power dynamics between and among men and women, boys and girls. Gender-blind interventions distinguish little between the needs of men and women, neither reinforcing nor questioning gender roles. However, this maintenance of the status quo can reinforce existing gender inequalities (IGWG, 2017).Gender discrimination: Gender discrimination describes the situation in which people are treated unequally simply because of their gender. Gender discrimination may be embodied in law (de jure) or result from practice (de facto) (Plan International, 2023).The state or condition that affords women and girls, men and boys equal enjoyment of human rights, socially valued goods, opportunities and resources regardless of whether they are born female or male (FAO, 2017). Pathways to gender equality include expanding the exercise of freedoms and voice, improving power dynamics and relations, transforming gender roles and enhancing overall quality of life so that women and girls, men and boys achieve their full potential (GTFN, 2023).These masculinities are supportive of women's empowerment and gender equality. They contest patriarchal structures and unequal gender power dynamics (adapted from OECD, 2021).Gender equity: This refers to the process of being fair to both women and men in the distribution of resources and benefits. It involves recognition of inequality and requires measures to work towards equality of women and girls, men and boys. Gender equity is the process that leads to gender equality (GTFN, 2023). Gender justice: Gender justice refers to a situation of full equality and equity between women and men in all spheres of life, resulting in women jointly -and on an equal basis with men -defining and shaping the policies, structures and decisions that affect their lives and the society as a whole (Oxfam, 2023).Gender mainstreaming: Gender mainstreaming is the process of assessing the implications for women and men of any planned action, including legislation, policies or programmes, in any area and at all levels. It is a strategy for making the concerns and experiences of women and men an integral part of the design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of policies and programmes in all political, economic and societal spheres. The ultimate goal is to achieve gender equality (adapted from UN Women, 2023).A subset of social norms, gender norms are informal rules and shared social expectations which determine and assign socially acceptable roles, behaviours, responsibilities and expectations to male and female identities. By influencing expectations for masculine and feminine behaviour that is considered socially acceptable and appropriate, gender norms directly affect individuals' choices, freedoms and capabilities (FAO, 2021).Gender relations: Gender relations refers to the social relationships and power distribution between and among men and women in both the private (personal) and public spheres (INEE, 2023).These interventions seek to reduce gender-based inequalities by assessing and responding to the different needs or interests of women and girls, men and boys, and by incorporating the views of women and girls. Some gender-specific actions are implemented to redress inequalities, but not in a comprehensive way (GTFN, 2023).Gender roles: Gender roles refers to the behaviours, tasks and responsibilities that a society considers appropriate for men, women, boys and girls (IFAD, 2021).These interventions identify and specify different practical and strategic needs of women, men, girls and boys along with the potential differential effects of project activities or approaches. The interventions take gender norms, roles, relations and differences into consideration, and try to make changes within these rules and norms, although they may not directly change them (GTFN, 2023).Gender stereotypes: Gender stereotypes are widely held, generalized assumptions whereby women and men are assigned attributes, characteristics and roles. Descriptive stereotypes refer to beliefs about specific characteristics that a person possesses based on their gender. Prescriptive stereotypes are beliefs about specific characteristics that a person should possess based on their gender (Stewart, 2013). Stereotypes about women are the result of deeply engrained attitudes, values, norms and prejudices against women. They are used to justify and maintain the historical power relations by which men dominate women (EIGE, 2016).A gender transformative approach seeks to actively examine, challenge and transform the underlying causes of gender inequalities rooted in discriminatory social structures. As such, a gender transformative approach aims to address unequal gendered power relations and discriminatory gender norms, attitudes, behaviours and practices, as well as discriminatory or gender-blind policies and laws that create and perpetuate gender inequalities.By doing so, it seeks to eradicate systemic forms of gender-based discrimination by creating or strengthening equitable gender relations and social structures that support gender equality (FAO, IFAD and WFP, 2022).These interventions include specific measures to change discriminatory social structures, sociocultural norms and gender relations to achieve more shared and equal power dynamics, decision-making and control of resources, as well as support for women's empowerment.Gender transformative methodologies are a suite of participatory approaches, methods and tools that encourage critical reflection and examination among women and men of gender norms and power relations (FAO, 2021).Gender transformative programming: Gender transformative programming involves taking a gender transformative approach to project and programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation throughout the project cycle.Programming strategies move beyond women's empowerment towards transforming unequal power relations and the social institutions which perpetuate and reinforce gender inequalities. At the core of gender transformative programming lie interventions that aim to address strategic gender interests in addition to practical gender needs, by triggering changes in agency, power relations and social structures at individual and systemic levels and across informal and formal life spheres (FAO, 2021).Gender transformative research aims to transform gender power dynamics and structures at the household, community and societal levels. It privileges marginalized perspectives and validates different ways of knowing. Women are central to the analysis, which is intersectional and contextualized.In gender transformative research, a participatory and collaborative approach is fostered to promote equal power dynamics (adapted from Hillenbrand et al., 2015;IDRC, 2018).These are initiatives that appear as if they benefit everyone equally, but in actual fact may have quite different and deleterious effects on certain members of a given group. Often constructed on the basis of treating everyone fairly or the same, these policies assume \"business as usual\" and ignore gender norms, roles and relations.Human rights: Human rights are inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status (UN, 2023).Indicators: Indicators are criteria or measures against which changes can be assessed. They may be pointers, facts, numbers, opinions or perceptions. Indicators are used to signify changes in specific conditions or progress towards particular objectives (OECD, 2007).Injunctive norms: Injunctive norms refer to what one believes others think one should do (Cialdini, Kallgren and Reno, 1991;Social Norms Learning Collaborative, 2021).Intersectionality: Intersectionality refers to how different social identities, such as gender, socioeconomic status, age, ethnicity, geographical location, marital status and physical abilities, intersect to shape experiences of discrimination and oppression.Masculinities: Masculinities comprise the various ways of enacting oneself and acting as a man. They refer to the specific expectations and values attributed with being and becoming a man in a given society (adapted from OECD, 2021).Organizations: Organizations are groups of individuals bound by a common purpose. These are shaped by social institutions and, in turn, influence how social institutions change (GSDRC, 2014).Patriarchy: Patriarchy is a social system of masculine domination over women (EIGE, 2016).Practical gender needs: Practical gender needs are a response to immediate perceived necessity, identified within a specific context. They are practical in nature and often stem from inadequacies in living conditions such as water provision, health care and employment (EIGE, 2016).Sanctions: Sanctions indicate social approval (positive sanctions) or disapproval (negative sanctions) for one's actions (Nguyen et al., 2020).Sex refers to biological and physiological characteristics that define humans as female or male (or other, for instance intersex) (GTFN, 2023).Social inclusion is the process of improving the abilities, opportunities and dignity of people who are disadvantaged on the basis of their identity, to better the terms on which they take part in society (SDC, 2023).Social institutions: Social institutions comprise the formal and informal rules and norms that organize social, political and economic relationsi.e. the underlying rules of the game. Formal institutions include: (i) political institutions such as parliaments, political parties , written constitutions, laws, policies, rights and regulations enforced by official authorities; (ii) formal membership organizations such as cooperatives; and (iii) economic institutions such as markets, private companies and banks. Informal institutions consist of the (usually unwritten) social norms, customs or traditions that shape thought and behaviour, such as kinship, marriage, inheritance and religion.In practice, formal and informal rules and norms can be complementary, competing or overlapping.Informal social norms may influence the design and implementation of formal institutions (GSDRC, 2014).Social justice: Social justice refers to the process of working towards change that reduces social inequalities, including gender inequalities, in a particular context (Fischer, Wittich and Fründt, 2019).Social norms: Social norms are unwritten \"rules\" governing behaviour shared by members of a given group or society. They are informal, often implicit, rules that most people accept and abide by. In contrast to individually held attitudes or beliefs, a social norm is defined by beliefs that are shared about a behaviour or practice (ALIGN, 2019). As such, the norms exist when a practice is considered both typical and approved of within a given group. Social norms can influence or uphold behaviour, and are typically maintained by social approval or disapproval for engaging in a behaviour (FAO, IFAD and WFP, 2022).Social structures: Social structures form the complex and stable framework of society that influences all individuals or groups through the relationship between institutions (e.g. economy, politics, religion) and social practices (e.g. behaviours, norms and values), or the ways social institutions are related and interact in a given society (Bell, 2015).These are interests identified by women as a result of their subordinate social status that tend to challenge gender divisions of labour, power and control, as well as traditionally defined norms and roles (adapted from ESCWA, 2023).Annexes ANNEX 1In the mid-1990s, Kabeer and Subrahmanian (1996, p. 20) explained that gender transformative policies \"seek to transform the existing gender relations in a more egalitarian direction through the redistribution of resources and responsibilities\" between women and men. They acknowledged this was politically challenging because men would be required to give up some of their privileges or take on responsibilities and roles normatively ascribed to women (Kabeer and Subrahmanian, 1996). Their paper was developed at a time when conceptualizations of women's empowerment had long been led by feminist activists, including in low-income countries.Feminist movements around the world developed distinctive approaches, engaging from the outset with an intersectional approach. As explained by Batliwala (2007, p. 558), \"The spread of 'women's empowerment' [was] a … political and transformatory idea for struggles that challenged not only patriarchy, but the mediating structures of class, race, ethnicityand, in India, caste and religion -which determined the nature of women's position and condition in developing societies\". A major focus of researchers and activists was on the transformation of power relations to advance women's rights and social justice in economic, social and political structures (Cornwall, 2009;Cornwall and Rivas, 2015). Critical conceptual links between women's self-understanding, their capacity for self-expression, and their access to resources were also developed (Cornwall and Rivas, 2015;Kabeer, 1999). Kabeer (1994) and others began to develop a classification system termed the \"genderequality continuum\" to identify approaches to development as being gender-blind, gender-neutral, gender-accommodative, gender-sensitive, gender-responsive and gender transformative (UNICEF, 2019;HC3, 2016b;UNDP, 2015;Cornwall and Rivas, 2015). 6 Further efforts towards institutionalization included global landmark policy achievements on gender equality, such as the 1979 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), 7 the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, 8 and Millennium Development Goal 3 (Promote gender equality and empower women). 9Yet despite these enormous political commitments, during the 2000s and into the 2010s there was growing concern that the very processes involved in gender mainstreaming actually meant that the terms \"empowerment\" and \"gender equality\" were, in some cases, in danger of becoming \"eviscerated of conceptual and political bite\" (Cornwall and Rivas, 2015, p. 396). A significant body of gender equality and women's empowerment interventions appeared to be focused more on what empowered women could do for achieving development goals, rather than on building an understanding of empowerment as desirable in and of itself (Cornwall, 2016). There was an emphasis on \"filling gaps\" in women's access to knowledge, services, resources and markets, rather than on challenging and changing discriminatory social institutions (Hillenbrand et al., 2015;Njuki, Kaler and Parkins, 2016). These processes contributed to a proliferation of measures and indices, which were arguably too simple with respect to unit and scope of analysis and not effective enough at capturing the nuances of gender in differing social contexts (Tavenner and Crane, 2022). And, above all, by the mid-2010s there was the sense that years of advocacy, policy efforts and investments 6 Combinations of these approaches vary according to the model one espouses.7 See https://www.ohchr.org/en/treaty-bodies/cedaw 8 See https://www.unwomen.org/en/how-we-work/intergovernmental-support/world-conferences-on-women 9 See https://www.mdgmonitor.org/millennium-development-goal directed to gender mainstreaming were failing to bring the expected benefits for women's empowerment and gender equality.Nevertheless, on international policy agendas, change was afoot. The SDGs, integral to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, were agreed upon in 2015. SDG 5 made an explicit commitment to \"achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls\" in their own right. 10 The formulation of the SDGs, including the commitment to \"leave no one behind\", 11 reflected the understanding that the intersection of income inequality, the marginalization of certain social identities, and, frequently, locational disadvantage can lead to the systematic exclusion of certain groups (Kabeer and Santos, 2017). Intersectionality proposes that human lives cannot be understood as the expression of a single identity, such as gender, but rather are multidimensional and complex. Thus, inequalities and social differences are the outcome of intersections of different social locations, power relations and experiences (Hankivsky, 2014). At the same time, masculinities studies, conducted for decades in the health sector (Thompson and Pleck, 1995), became more common in rural development research (Cornwall, 2000), resulting in challenging and fruitful dialogues between feminist researchers and practitioners and those studying masculinities (Edström, Das and Dolan, 2014). Organizations like Promundo (now Equimundo) worked on the ground to promote understandings of masculinities and gender equality, developing in the process a number of valuable participatory approaches such as Journeys of Transformation (Promundo and CARE International in Rwanda, 2012). Today, masculinities and intersectionality are understood to be central to informing the design and implementation of gender transformative approaches (Mullinax, Hart and Garcia, 2018;Cole et al., 2015).A decade ago, drawing on the work of many organizations and individuals, CGIAR started developing its own conceptualization of gender transformative change. The CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems inspired systematic efforts to institutionalize gender transformative programming (Shaw and Kristjanson, 2013;McDougall et al., 2021).The CGIAR Gender and Agriculture Research Network (2012-2016) was followed by the CGIAR Collaborative Platform for Gender Research (2017-2019) and the current CGIAR GENDER Impact Platform. 12 Similarly, the global comparative research initiative GENNOVATE 13 was created to examine how gender norms and agency influence men, women and youth to adopt innovation in agriculture and natural resource management (Badstue et al., 2018). From this work, significant papers on how to conceptualize gender transformative change in agrifood systems began to emerge (Kantor and Apgar, 2013;Morgan, 2014;Cole et al., 2014;Hillenbrand et al., 2015;Njuki, Kaler and Parkins, 2016;Mullinax, Hart and Garcia, 2018).In 2019, the European Union, FAO, IFAD and WFP launched the Joint Programme on Gender Transformative Approaches for Food Security, Improved Nutrition and Sustainable Agriculture (JP GTA), designed in response to a call at the joint 2016 high-level event \"Step It Up Together with Rural Women to End Hunger and Poverty\", 14 with financial support from the European Union. The JP GTA aims to strengthen the RBAs' contribution to the attainment of SDG 5 by explicitly addressing the root causes of gender inequalities and triggering transformative change processes that lead to gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls (FAO, IFAD and WFP, 2021). The first principle of the European Union Action Plan on Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment in External Action 2021-2025 (European Union, 2020, p. 4) commits to gender transformative change, which means \"examining, questioning and changing rigid gender norms and imbalances of power which disadvantage women and girls and generate discriminations at all ages, starting from early childhood, in societies.\" Fattal, 2022;McDougall et al., 2022). To some extent, the studies and writings in the current literature are rebuilding the understanding created decades ago that women and men must be able to challenge how they are represented, define what gender transformative change means to them, and meaningfully engage in decision-making systems.Complementary resources for measuring gender transformative changeThese Guidelines provide an overarching framework on how to measure gender transformative change, including several methodological issues to consider when developing gender transformative change indicators, and a step-by-step process for developing said indicators.In keeping with the Guidelines, this section presents some examples of complementary tools and methods that programmes can include in their toolbox for use when measuring gender transformative change. The examples are organized below according to the tools and methods for measuring the key dimensions of gender transformative change as per the framework provided in these Guidelines. It is important to note that some tools and methods focus on empowerment rather than gender transformative change per se. They are included when there is high potential for adapting them to gender transformative change measurement.Based on the process described in these Guidelines, we also provide some examples of tools and methods that will help organizations apply an intersectional lens and bring in insider perspectives when setting up their gender transformative research or development programme. Finally, we include quantitative and qualitative tools and methods to assist organizations in developing outcome indicators and in understanding incremental changes that occur during a programme cycle.Tools and methods for measuring agency The Gender and Power Analysis examines key gaps, risks and barriers that constrain gender equality and social justice in different arenas of life. The tool also helps identify people's experiences of power and privilege (with a specific focus on experiences of young people) as well as drivers of positive social change. It comprises six domains that can be used to explore a range of topics, including dimensions of gender transformative change, and is especially helpful for understanding how power differentials and accompanying systems of oppression operate.Bywater, K., Avakyan, Y. & Lepillez, K. 2021. Gender and power analysis. GAP analysis: a child-centred and intersectional approach. Save the Children. https:// resourcecentre. savethechildren. net/pdf/GAP-Guidance_FINAL. pdf/This toolkit covers social analysis and action to facilitate gender and social transformation. Section 4 on monitoring, evaluation and learning provides guidance on gender and power analysis to collect, identify, examine and analyse information on different power holders, norms and networks, as well as the roles of men and women.In particular, it focuses on examining diversity among groups of women, men, girls and boys. While it cuts across all three key dimensions of gender transformative change, it is a particularly good example of how to measure power relations. PVMSC is a participatory approach to measurement, evaluation and learning (MEL). The approach amplifies the voices of participants to enable organizations to better understand and improve their programmes. PVMSC uses a set of techniques to involve a group or community in shaping and creating their own film. Among these, the Most Significant Change technique is a form of participatory monitoring and evaluation.It involves the collection of significant change stories from the field, with panels of designated stakeholders or staff selecting the most significant stories.Access to a free version of the toolkitThis manual explains how to develop the Gender Action Learning System (GALS). Part 3 (pp. 102-105) presents several tools for sharing, aggregating, evaluating and discussing knowledge gained to date. The manual also provides tools to ensure challenges are addressed, and to highlight the importance of self-led tracking and planning processes. There is a particular focus on ensuring gender justice is not lost during the GALS process, as participants move to deepen their understanding of livelihood and business planning. The manual also helps participants to build on positive gender changes and improve change processes. The sphere of influence that the assessment of the outcomes could target is also indicated along with a hypothetical programme focus. The sample indicators were developed using the \"knowledge, skills and access to information\" core area of gender equality (see Table 3).Core area of gender inequality: Knowledge, skills and access to information Outcome 2 -Men in powerful positions and male members of associations see value in having women leaders.Outcome 1 -At month 6: Male leaders of associations reflect on and develop action plans at community-based workshops to address the underlying causes of women's low representation in association leadership positions.-At year 1: Male leaders develop by-laws that make it mandatory that 50 percent of leadership positions be held by women.Outcome 2 -At year 2: Attitudes of male association members are becoming more positive regarding the presence of female leaders in the association.Outcome 1 -Ratio of women to men in leadership positions -Percentage of female members who believe that most people in their community would disapprove if they took up leadership roles (injunctive norm)-Percentage of women and men who report that it is common in their community for women to hold leadership roles in farmers' associations (descriptive norm)Outcome 2 -Percentage of male leaders who believe it is important to have gender parity in leadership positions -Percentage of members (women and men) who believe that only men can be good leaders or can fill leadership rolesOutcome Outcome 1 -At year 1: Scheduled caste women have the skills, knowledge and capital to manage small dairy businesses.-At year 2-3: (Extended) household-level attitudes are more positive regarding scheduled caste women's engagement in dairy businesses.Outcome 2 -At month 6: Scheduled caste women are trained with general caste and other backward caste women in the setting up of small dairy businesses and associated technical knowledge, and supported with tailored, gender-responsive loans.-At year 2-3: Scheduled caste women are able to run a successful operation, and community members acknowledge their new capacities and success.-At year 4-5: Community members across caste demonstrate positive attitudes regarding the engagement of scheduled caste households, and specifically women, in dairy production.Outcome 1 -Percentage of scheduled caste women who manage dairy businesses compared to general caste men -Percentage of scheduled caste men who believe that men support their wives' involvement in the dairy business (descriptive norm)-Percentage of scheduled caste men who believe that other men will think positively of them if they support their wife's involvement in the dairy business (injunctive norm)Outcome 2 -Percentage of men who believe that women (including scheduled caste women) have the capacity to own/manage dairy businesses (descriptive norm)-Percentage of men who believe that others in the community think that women (including scheduled caste women) have the capacity to own/manage dairy businesses (injunctive norm)Outcome 1 -Cross-caste community perception of scheduled caste women's engagement in the dairy business Outcome 1 -At year 1-2: Men's attitudes are more gender-equitable regarding who should perform home-based work versus productive work outside the home.Outcome 2 -At year 1: Men take up domestic and caretaking tasks reliably in their households.-At year 2: The participation of women in high-value markets increases.Outcome 1 -Percentage of men who believe that other men perform unpaid domestic work (descriptive norm)-Percentage of men and women who agree that it is common in their community for a man and woman to share child care and household chores equally (descriptive norm)-Percentage of women who think that people in their community approve of them spending their time working outside the household (injunctive norm) -At year 1: Policy-and decision-makers carry out policy reforms that ensure the needs, interests and constraints of all female and male farmers are attended to through agricultural extension services.-At year 2: District agricultural staff have the sensitivity, capacity and resources to be more gender-responsive, and recognize the importance of ensuring diversity and inclusion in the workplace.-Percentage of extension officers who apply differential approaches and methods for technical support for different types of farmers -Percentage of women farmers who report access to more frequent and better-tailored extension services, and have increased their productivity as a result -Percentage of extension officers who think that other extension officers provide gender-responsive services (descriptive norm)-Percentage of extension officers who think that most extension officers would approve of them providing genderresponsive extension services (injunctive norm)-Extension officers' experiences providing gender-responsive extension support to young women farmers, and the results from using such an approach -Young women farmers' experiences receiving genderresponsive support via their district extension network and the benefits they see for the development of their skills, knowledge and practical experience The SAA model is meant to be integrated into sector-focused programmes, through which individuals and communities explore and challenge social norms, beliefs and practices concerning gender and sexuality. The framework proposed sees change as a process instead of an end-point. It focuses on documenting and learning from small, incremental changes, and on the quality of programme implementation (e.g. staff perceptions of and commitment to gender equality, capacities of community-level facilitators or partners, and knowledge of SAA implementation).As the pathway to change is non-linear, the indicators suggested \"do not map a simple one-toone relationship to the three domains of change. Each indicator, while situated in either agency, or structure, or relations in the table, reflects multiple changes that in reality cut across the three dimensions. For example, the prevalence of female-owned businesses may reflect changes in individual choices and capabilities it may also reflect structural changes in shifting labour market incentives\" (p. 15). The authors argue it is necessary to ensure there are indicators to capture change in all dimensions.The document outlines an approach that organizes indicators into two groups. Group one includes indicators that measure immediate outcomes, mostly referring to the implementation of the SAA approach (e.g. staff become active champions of gender equality; individuals and communities are increasingly aware of -and motivated to change -inequitable gender, social and power norms; collective efficacy increases). Group two includes indicators that measure intermediate outcomes, reflecting changes in either agency, relations or structures. Within the second group the authors further classify indicators as either cross-cutting (e.g. self-efficacy, gender-based violence, genderequitable attitudes) or sector-specific (e.g. women's economic empowerment, food security and nutrition, sexual health, and reproductive rights). For research design and measurement, the authors recommend a theory of change that focuses on assessing incremental progress toward gender transformative change: i.e. using progress markers that assess small incremental changes instead of only end-points. This allows for defining benchmarks of success and provides clarity on what data is needed and for what purpose.Measuring \"catalytic\" changes should also be facilitated, which will eventually result in longerterm change.To understand gender transformative change, researchers need to better conceptualize and measure women's empowerment as being about changing power relationships and structures.Hence the paper argues that indicators should focus on relational and structural changes, as indicators related to women's individual mobility (e.g. the ability to go out alone) do not capture structural and relational dynamics. Furthermore, organizations need to understand from their projects and partners what gender transformative change looks like within their lived realities, and then create research and measurement based on this feedback.Finally, the paper stresses that MEL systems must include gender indicators based on participant and programmatic staff input. For example, organizations can ask teams their definition of gender equality in their particular context, and what it would ideally look like after the project closes.-Changes in women's power across multiple levels, including agency, inner household relationship dynamics, and structural systems and policies (i.e. socioecological framework) in comparison to men -Changes in gender stereotypes -Reflections of men and women on the consequences of the inequalities embedded within gender roles and norms, and of the resulting distribution of resources, thus encouraging a change in power relations in the community-Women make decisions over strategic aspects of their family business.-Men are more (or equally) involved in household duties.-Men inform women about their movements.-Women are able to go out alone. -Percentage of population above 18 years of age who believe or believe strongly that \"when a mother works for pay, the children suffer.\"-Percentage of population above 18 years of age who think that \"being a housewife is just as fulfilling as working for pay.\"-Percentage of population above 18 years of age who agree or agree strongly that \"if a woman earns more money than her husband, it's almost certain to cause problems.\"-Whether or not the same legal minimum age of marriage applies to both women and men -Whether or not women and men have the same legal rights, decision-making abilities, and responsibilities within the household-Sex ratio among children aged 0-4 (number of males per 100 females)-Percentage of women aged 15-49 who consider a husband to be justified in hitting or beating his wife for at least one of the following reasons: burning the food, arguing with him, going out without telling him, neglecting the children, or refusing sexual relations -Percentage of women who have suffered intimate partner violence or sexual violence at least once in their lives -Whether or not the legal framework protects women from violence, including intimate partner violence, rape and sexual harassment, without legal exceptions and under a comprehensive approach Access to productive and financial resources -Whether or not women and men have the same legal rights and secure access to land assets -Whether or not women and men share equal rights and opportunities in the workplace, including protection during pregnancy, parental leave, equal pay, and equal access to professionsCivil liberties -Percentage of the population who agree that \"on the whole, men make better political leaders than women do.\"","tokenCount":"11877"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1255021917.json b/data/part_2/1255021917.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fcec222c9cbd9e9998f6c1064158471a1de1ba82 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1255021917.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"396329b0311b6d168f26ce1b4a1ad1a2","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://publications.iwmi.org/pdf/H040604.pdf","id":"650326854"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"0d74b34a-b516-491d-baf1-b38168557e21","pagecount":"17","content":"Despite the success claimed for the irrigation sector in contributing to falling food prices, food security and raising farm income, irrigation has, in the last two decades, elicited growing frustration in the community of aid agencies and development banks. A major reason for such sentiment is the low financial sustainability of the sector, which incurs recurrent rehabilitation expenditure and subsidies to operation and maintenance (O&M) that add to the large initial investment costs. A second reason is that agriculture accounts for 70% of the use of water and, despite growing shortages, is seen to be bedevilled by very low levels of efficiency (the water effectively used is only a small fraction of the water diverted) that seem unacceptable in a time of growing needs in other sectors. In addition, farmers often apply large quantities of water to irrigate crops that have both high water requirements and a low return (typically, rice in Asia).These problems of perceived low efficiency, poor management and financial unsustainability have been addressed by a wide range of actions that include rehabilitation, modernization, improved technical management, participatory management, turnover and collection of water charges. The limited benefits obtained have spurred many proposals to tackle these problems with some economic tools and incentives, particularly in the aftermath of the Hague and Dublin meetings (Rogers et al., 1997).In Thailand, water is supplied to agriculture free of charge: water is best seen as a gift, traditionally linked to the good will or power of the absolute king, who mediates its supply from supernatural forces. Chonlaprathan, the Thai word for irrigation, embodies a notion of the royal gift. The Loy Krathong festival, in November, when offerings are put afloat on the waterways of the kingdom to thank the water spirits for the life that water brings, epitomizes the relationship between people and water. However, proposals for water pricing in the country can be found as early as 1903, in the General Report on Irrigation and Drainage in the Lower Menam (Chao Phraya) Valley, submitted to the Government of Siam by Van der Heide (1903), a Dutch engineer in charge of the Department of Canals:A water tax could be levied, in a manner similar to the paddy land tax, over the whole area at present cultivated and the future extension of this area, as far as the fields are benefited by the [irrigation] system . . . water rates could in general be assessed in some proportion to the quantity of water utilized, and would most probably be a suitable taxation for dry season crops and garden cultivation.The logic for pricing water may have, at that time, been borrowed from practices in Java, India or other Asian countries under colonial rule. Likewise, in the post-World War II period when the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development funded the development of infrastructures in the Chao Phraya delta, the consultant in charge of the study saw no difference between irrigation supply and railways or electricity and stated that it would 'not be a misuse of language or an exaggeration to describe the position [of Thailand] as extraordinary. . . . The Irrigation Department is thus unique among the commercial departments of the Government in Thailand in deriving no revenue from its services and unique or nearly so in this respect, throughout the world' (IBRD, 1950). 1 Although, at the time, the Thai government had shown willingness to establish fees once the scheme would be completed and proper supply ensured to users (IBRD, 1950), the idea seems to have then vanished and only recently come to the fore. In the aftermath of the 1997 financial crisis, reform of the agriculture and water sectors was encouraged by both the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank (ADB), and the latter supported the definition of an ambitious plan aimed at introducing river basin management, service agreements between the Royal Irrigation Department (RID) and users, cost recovery dubbed as 'cost-sharing', and legal dispositions around a Water Law. This policy remained a dead letter for a set of reasons that cannot be easily untangled, but which includes resistance from line agencies, weak political support and the over-optimistic and often unrealistic nature of many of the proposals. Despite the setting of a policy matrix that defined commitment to successive milestones to be achieved, the process lost momentum before being eventually discontinued by the Thaksin administration.In this chapter, I first examine the relevance of the arguments for establishing water charges in the particular context of Thailand, and most particularly that of the Chao Phraya delta, the rice bowl of the country (Molle and Srijantr, 2003). In the first section, I address successively the role of pricing as: (i) a means to signal to users the economic value of water and hence regulate its use and avoid wastage; (ii) an instrument to reallocate water to crops with higher water productivity or to non-agriculture sectors; and (iii) a cost recovery mechanism. In the second section, I briefly examine reforms that failed in the past, and attempt to draw conclusions on both the potential charging for water and the way a policy reform process should unfold. Although unsuccessful, these attempts at reforming the water sector provide useful lessons on the constraints commonly faced by water pricing policies, particularly when they fail to fully appreciate the context in which they are to operate.Before turning to these points, it is useful to single out a few specific features of the Chao Phraya delta, on which the analysis will focus. Agriculture in the delta traditionally distinguishes between the wet season (where rain is abundant, sometimes in excess, and irrigation merely a complement) and the dry season (when irrigation is a prerequisite to agriculture). The hydrology of the delta is very complex, since it includes numerous side flows and return flows, canals serving for both supply and drainage, generalized use of pumps, predominance of paddy with common plot-to-plot systems of supply, vulnerability to flooding, use of waterways for navigation, domestic supply, dilution of pollution load, etc. This defines a context with numerous uses and users where it is difficult to clearly identify both the sources of supply and the uses, and which is therefore little amenable to quantitative regulative mechanisms. Many of these features apply to other Asian deltas, particularly those of the Cauvery, Ganges-Brahmaputra, 1 The consultant also underlined the value of charging for water in order to limit wastage and to control society's demand for unsound projects: 'Mankind values the things it has to pay for and thinks little of and uses wastefully the things it gets free. Moreover if water is supplied free, farmers who get no water will be unable to see why their neighbours should and the Government will be embarrassed by pressure to carry out schemes regardless of whether they are sound or not.'Irrawaddi and Mekong rivers. On the other hand, the delta includes Bangkok and enjoys good transportation networks and rather efficient linkages to urban and export markets.Dealing with unacceptable water wastage?The statement that water is wasted when it is free or underpriced probably appears in one form or another in all papers and reports that address the issue of water pricing (see Molle and Berkoff,Chapter 2,this volume). This simple axiom has been disseminated widely by analysts like Sandra Postel (1992), who observes that 'water is consistently undervalued, and as a result is chronically overused', by development banks and agencies (e.g. World Bank, 1993;ADB, 2000), as well as by many academics. In Thailand, an endless number of observers 2 have taken it for granted, notably TDRI (1990) and Christensen and Boon-Long (1994), who posit that 'since water is not appropriately priced, it is used inefficiently, and consumers have no incentive to economize'. Several reasons, related to both theoretical assumptions and constraints to implementation, showing that such statement may be misleading are reviewed here. That rising water fees may be conducive to water saving is shown by numerous experiences in the domestic and industrial water sectors (Gibbons, 1986;Dinar and Subramanian, 1997;Dinar, 2000). Since individual meters can be easily installed on pressurized pipe networks, volumetric charging is practical and users' behaviour is generally affected by rising charges although, beyond a certain point, the elasticity of water demand falls drastically. The facts that volumetric charging is a prerequisite and that it is not feasible in the short run in most large-scale irrigation schemes of Asia are well recognized in the literature. Yet, in Thailand, where most of the hydraulic structures are rather crude, this evidence is generally glossed over and the potential benefits of volumetric charging are often assumed implicitly for pricing in general, as illustrated by the various statements collected in footnote 3.Since volumetric pricing at the individual farm level is unrealistic, 'water wholesaling' in which water is attributed to groups of users, for example, to the farmers who are served by the same lateral canal, appears to be an attractive option. This alternative has the advantage of encouraging farmers to act collectively to achieve reduced demand within the command area of their canal, and shifts on them the burden of solving conflicts and collecting a water charge. However, the effectiveness of such an arrangement rests on the possibility of: (i) defining and registering who the beneficiaries are; (ii) designing a transparent allocation mechanism at basin, project and farm levels; (iii) ensuring water supply to groups in accordance with an agreed service; and (iv) having Water User Groups that are in a position to perform all the tasks entrusted to them. Therefore, the wholesaling of water appears more like an option that would be made possible by a series of critical reforms spanning technical, legal, managerial and political domains, than a measure that can be put forward in a 'non-mature' context. In the case of Thailand, few, if any, of these prerequisites are met.The policy framework supported by the ADB in the 1999-2001 period (see later section) laid some foundations for establishing 'cost-sharing' and defining 'service agreements' between the RID and users that could amount to a kind of bulk allocation. Attractive in its design, the policy probably much 2 How popular wisdom emerges can be sensed from the following declarations. An offi cial of the Ministry of Agriculture said: 'Water should be priced in order to increase the effi ciency of its use in the farm sector' (The Nation, 2000, 21 April); 'Agricultural experts agree that water-pricing measures would help improve effi ciency in water use among farmers' (The Nation, 1999, 17 February); the Director of the National Water Resources Committee observed: 'In reality water is scarce, and the only mechanism to save water and encourage effi cient use is to give it a price' (The Nation, 2000, 23 April); etc. underestimated 3 both the technical difficulties to define and ensure service agreements and the institutional/political transformations required (Molle et al., 2001). Even where bulk allocation was implemented as part of a programme of management transfer (as in Mexico and Turkey), was credited with some success and contributed to a better fee collection and financial situation, there is little evidence that significant water saving in land or water productivity or gains have resulted from these reforms (Murray-Rust and Svendsen, 2001;Samad, 2001).Even if some kind of volumetric pricing were possible, prices would have to be set at a level high enough to have a bearing on farmers' behaviour. There is, indeed, overwhelming evidence from the literature that tariffs which reflect O&M costs and are economically feasible are in too low a range to have any significant impact on behaviour (Gibbons, 1986;de Fraiture and Perry, Chapter 3, this volume;Ray, Chapter 4, this volume). An average water fee of B(baht)120/ rai (one rai = 0.16 ha) as proposed by the ADB policy (H&P and A&E, 2001) would amount to 5-7% of the farmer's net income per rai. While not negligible, such a value would be unlikely to affect behaviour at the margin, assuming -for the sake of demonstrationvolumetric and individual pricing, saving, say, 30% of water would increase the revenue per rai by only 2%, a value much under the opportunity cost of the additional labour necessary to achieve such water savings at the plot level. It can therefore be safely concluded that the proposed fee, based on area and set at half the estimated O&M costs, would have no impact on water use whatsoever, despite repeated claims to the contrary.The second issue considered here is whether water is indeed wasted, and whether significant savings could be achieved, through pricing or other means. Recently, the Director-General of the Royal Irrigation Department on a Thai national television channel declared somewhat contritely that water efficiency was very low in Thailand and that this had to be remedied in the face of the water shortages experienced by the country. International agencies (and sometimes, in their footsteps, local officials) commonly report that Thai farmers are guzzling water or are showing water greed (The Nation, n.d.), furthering the general idea that efficiency in large state-run irrigated schemes is often as low as 30% (TDRI, 1990), and sticking to this overall vision without questioning it any further. Yet, research conducted in recent years has shown that water basins tend to 'close' when demand builds up: most of the regulated water in the basin is depleted and little water is eventually 'lost' out of the system when it has value (downstream requirements and environmental services taken into account). There has been widespread recognition that focusing on relatively low irrigation efficiency at the on-farm or secondary levels could be totally misleading (Keller et al., 1996;Perry, 1999;Molle, 2004). When analysed at the basin level, closing systems are eventually found to operate with a high overall efficiency during the dry season.In-depth investigations in the Chao Phraya river basin (Molle et al., 2001;Molle, 2004), most particularly in the delta, have shown that users and managers have not been passive when confronted with water scarcity but, on the contrary, have responded to it in many ways. Farmers have developed conjunctive use, dug farm ponds, drilled wells, closed small drains and invested in an impressive pumping capacity to access these sources. Dam managers have come under pressure to avoid dam releases that are in excess of downstream requirements and have improved management. Reuse of water along the basin and within the delta has developed to the point that, in the dry season, only an estimated 12% of the water released by the dams is lost to non-beneficial evaporation or outflow -effectively recycling the 'losses' from excessive water diversions 3 One of the consultants involved considered that the policy was not optimistic but 'simply stated what, ideally, ought to be done, without claiming that it would be done'. This, however, implies that proposals are made on a prescriptive and idealized mode without taking into consideration the institutional and political context in which they are supposed to be inserted.in exactly the way that research elsewhere has found and predicted. Because of the tendency to focus on state-designed policies, all the endogenous adjustments to water scarcity that accompany the closure of a river basin are generally overlooked (Molle, 2004).Irrespective of whether they pay for water or not, farmers are aware that water is valuable and scarce because they are directly confronted with the consequences of its scarcity, and have made significant investments in pumps, wells and ponds to tackle it. To squander water, farmers should first be in a position to access more water than they need, which is contradictory to the situation in the dry season, where cropping intensity is around 60% and where water shortages push farmers to actively look for alternative sources of water.In the wet season, patterns of water use often differ. In many instances water management is geared towards getting rid or controlling the potential damage, of excess water, rather than saving water. Water use at the farm level may be wasteful, but this only reflects the fact that supply is continuous and abundant (with a zero opportunity cost) and that the water 'wasted' was destined to flow back to the river anyway. Indeed, abundant water can ease management both to farmers and operators so that 'wasting' water may be the economic optimum given its zero opportunity cost.Finally, stating that water is 'free' misses the point that the majority of farmers have to resort to pumping to access water in the dry season (when saving water is an issue), to offset both the lack of water and the uncertainty in delivery. Because of the costs incurred by these water-lifting operations, there is little likelihood that farmers (80% of farmers in the lower Chao Phraya basin have at least one pump set) will squander water (Bos and Wolters, 1990).Shortages and crises are not due to a hypothetical low efficiency but to the insufficient control over interannual regulation, water allocation and distribution. The lack of strong technical criteria in managing dams and in allocating water to irrigation, the uncontrolled planting 4 by farmers and the irresistible political pressures to which competition for water gives rise, lead to escalating risk and sporadic shortages. This does not dismiss the fact that efficiency gains are desirable but draws our attention to the inconsistency of the commonly stated relationship between farmers' efficiency and water shortage.Overall, it emerges that both the empirical and theoretical justifications advanced to support the use of water pricing as a regulatory tool for saving water do not hold in the present case. On the one hand, water is not squandered as commonly assumed (adjustments to de facto scarcity occur), the overall efficiency of water use is high (reuse of return flows), and most farmers incur costs to access water that is, therefore, neither free nor wasted. On the other hand, theoretically, savings could be expected if pricing was volumetric and high enough to affect farmers' behaviour, but this has not been verified.Improving irrigation efficiency is only one aspect of better using scarce water resources. Another potential benefit from water pricing could be to encourage a shift towards crops that are less water-intensive, and/or that display a better water productivity ($/m 3 ), or towards non-agricultural uses. Volumetric pricing would directly penalize crops with high consumption of water, but it could also be possible to establish water charge differentials based on crop type, that would 4 The hopelessness of offi cials is apparent in public declarations: The Deputy Agriculture Minister reported in early 1998 that 'plantations in Nakhon Sawan, Tak and Kamphaeng Phet had increased to more than 670,000 rai from a target of 190,000' (Bangkok Post, 1999, 13 January), while the RID Director admitted that 'things are out of control', with 330,000 rai under cultivation, against a limit set at 90,000 rai (The Nation, 1999, 8 January). 'Our major concern is that we have no effective measures to control the use of water by rice growers. The only thing we can do is ask for their cooperation to cut down rice cultivation.' encourage farmers to grow crops with lower water requirements. This runs into the same difficulties exposed in the preceding section regarding the elasticity of water use, the impact on farm income, and the constraints to metering volumes (crop-type-based fees escape this last constraint but face costs in monitoring effective land use). This rationale on crop selection often implicitly assumes that farmers do not diversify into field crops, vegetable or fruit crops because water is cheap or free, leading them to favour water-intensive crops (e.g. rice or sugarcane). This assumption also needs to be put in context.In Thailand, the possibility of achieving water conservation by inducing a shift away from rice to field crops, which consume (ET) only 50-80% of the amount of water needed for rice, has long been underlined by policy makers and has formed the cornerstone of state projects aimed at fostering agricultural diversification (Siriluck and Kammeier, 2003). This was already a recommendation of the FAO as early as the 1960s, as well as the alternative that 'received the most attention' from Small (1972), in his study of the delta. Such a concern has been constantly expressed for at least four decades. Even nowadays, it is not rare to hear officials complaining off record, that 'farmers are stubborn', that 'they lack knowledge and only know how to grow rice' and that 'they oppose any change', despite being shown the benefits they might expect from it. Crop selection, however, is a more complex issue than merely choosing the crop with higher return to land or water.First, the rationale for induced shifts in land use is generally -implicitly or explicitly -based on average farmers' income, overlooking the aspect of risk, which is crucial in shaping farmers' decision making. Even for irrigated agriculture, where yields are deemed to be more secured, risks in production are not negligible and include both agronomic hazards (diseases, pests, etc.) and a higher risk in marketing, further compounded by the higher requirements of cash input demanded by commercial crops. As a general rule, the potential return of capital investments is strongly correlated to the level of risk attached to the activity undertaken (Molle et al., 2002). This is clearly exemplified by Szuster et al. (2003) in their comparative study of rice and shrimp farming in the delta. In other words, while cash crops may generate higher average returns, they are also subject to more uncertainty, either in terms of yields or farm-gate prices. Thus, only those farmers with enough capital reserve to weather the losses experienced in some years can afford to benefit from the average higher returns; others become indebted or go bankrupt. Shrimp farming in the delta, again, provides a good example of such a situation.It could be argued, however, that the price of rice in Thailand is also unpredictable and that rice production suffers from uncertainty as much as other crops do. If the rice price does fluctuate, its crucial importance for the rural economy brings it under more scrutiny. Despite recurring complaints, echoed in newspapers, that rice farmers lose money when producing rice, the political ramifications of possible low prices and the outcry they instantaneously generate, largely shield them in reality from dropping under the break-even threshold. 5 Ad hoc public interventions are always implemented when such a risk arises (even though their impact generally falls short of expectations, and benefits tend to be captured by millers and other actors in the rice industry). This does not hold, however, for secondary or marginal crops (that invariably include the desirable 'cash crops'), and complaints of scattered producers have little chance of being heard in case of depressed prices. A typical example of such a cash crop is chilli, a rather capitaland labour-intensive crop, which can fetch B25/kg in one year (providing a high return) and B2 or B3/kg in the following year (with a net loss for farmers). 6 5 In addition, rice can also be readily stored and used for own consumption, or provided to relatives and friends.This situation differs signifi cantly from that of western agriculture, where fl oor prices or 'intervention schemes' are generally established to compensate for economic losses when these occur. In addition, western farmers generally benefi t from insurance (against exceptional yield losses) that comes with stronger cooperative and professional structures.Second, several other constraints to diversification related to production factors are faced by farmers: labour may be lacking; for example, the harvest of mung bean, a typical supplementary crop with no additional water requirements, is often a problem because of labour shortage; capital is often required to transform the land (e.g. conversion to shrimp farms or orchards) or to invest in microirrigation; specific skills are necessary and not easily acquired by an ageing farming population; markets may be limited or the farmers not linked to them. Third, the delta agroecology, including heavy soils with little drainage and flood risk, is overall not favourable to growing field crops especially if neighbours are all growing rice. Fourth, the overextension of irrigation facilities, fostered by considerations of regional equity and by political patronage, makes it impossible to confine them to high-return agriculture only.The last point is noteworthy. Farmers are expected to behave as rational profitmaximizers and they are not directly concerned with water productivity ($/m 3 ) but, rather, by the net income per unit of land ($/ha) as well as by the risk attached to a given crop or activity (Wichelns, 1999). There are several alternative crops to rice. A first group -vegetables, fruits and flowers -fares better in terms of income, water productivity and absolute water consumption. A second group -field crops, such as groundnut, mung bean and maize -uses less water, and may have better water productivity, but is generally less profitable and/or riskier with regard to selling prices. A third group -fruits in raised beds, aquaculture -includes crops with better income and water productivity but higher consumption of water. Considering these various options it is clear that water productivity may or may not be increased by a profitmaximizing cropping pattern. 7 Siriluck and Kammeier's ( 2003) study of a large-scale public programme aimed at encouraging crop diversification in Thailand showed that such interventions are met with mixed success and are not flexible enough to adapt to different physical and socioeconomic environments. In many instances, the attempt by extension workers to meet the 'targets' ascribed by the project has led to inadequate investments and choices, sometimes resulting in debts or bankruptcy. It is doubtful that 'pushing' for more diversification is eventually beneficial. Decisions should be made by farmers, based on their own appreciation of their environment and left to market mechanisms, in order to avoid exposing non-entrepreneurial farmers to bankruptcy. Evidence of the dynamics of diversification in the delta (Kasetsart University and IRD, 1996;Cheyroux, 2003;Molle and Srijantr, 2003) points to the fact that farmers display great responsiveness to market changes and opportunities (a point definitely confirmed by the recent spectacular development of inland shrimp farming: Szuster et al., 2003). Good transportation and communication networks allow marketing channels to perform rather efficiently. Farmers will shift to other productions if uncertainty on water and sale prices is lowered. Time and again, Thai farmers have shown dramatic responsiveness to constraints on other production factors, such as land and labour for example (Molle and Srijantr, 1999), and have already sufficiently experienced the scarcity of water to adapt their cropping patterns, should conditions be favourable. Inducing crop shifts by raising differential fees to the level where they might be effective would substantially impact on farm income and critically raise economic risk, which is precisely the main factor that hinders diversification. While some potential may remain unrealized it is very unlikely that water would be a main constraint, or that pricing it would result in any significant shift.The reallocation of water towards more beneficial uses can also occur across sectors. The issue is somewhat simpler, as few object to the fact that domestic and industrial uses are to receive priority over irrigation. Here again, differential prices could theoretically help reallocate water, although water markets 8 are generally seen as being more efficient in theory. While the literature seems to underscore that there are significant potential economic gains to be expected from such transfers, it is apparent that in Thailand, this reallocation does occur and that nonagricultural activities are very little constrained, if at all, by lack of water. While the impact of the transfer of water out of agriculture is an important question (Howe et al., 1990;Rosegrant and Ringler, 1998), leaving open the question of compensation, reallocation is taken care of by the state in several ways, as shown by the case of Bangkok Metropolitan Area (BMA): the growth of BMA generated a rise in demand from 0.46 million m 3 /day in 1978 to approximately 7.5 million m 3 /day in 2000, a 16-fold increase in 22 years (Molle et al., 2001). This has been made possible not only by increasing the share of the Chao Phraya flow allocated to the city (up to 45-50 m 3 /s) but also by using groundwater, with an average extraction around 3 Million m 3 /day (TDRI, 1990). Future demand will be met by a recently completed canal which transfers water from the adjacent 'water-rich' Mae Klong basin (with a planned capacity of 45 m 3 /s to be reached in 2017).This shows, first, that the priority given to Bangkok has readily translated into an increased diversion of surface water (to the detriment of irrigation to the extent that it reduces the amount available in the dry season), and, second, that the impact of the shift has been mitigated by allowing industries to mine deep aquifers (at the cost of land subsidence and sustainability). Water from the Mae Klong basin will allow Bangkok to face future growth in demand, although possibly at a higher capital cost in economic terms than might have been possible if more water had been diverted out of agriculture in the delta area. This illustrates that Bangkok's needs are attended to in priority and that -despite its larger share in total water use -agriculture largely gets the leftover water in the system. Commentators, however, keep on asserting that the state has proved inefficient in centrally allocating water to the most beneficial use. 9 It is interesting to note the ubiquity of this argument even in settings where this problem has been handled relatively successfully.Justifications for cost recovery are diverse. One argument is that irrigators form a segment of society that has benefited from a specific capital investment by the state and, as such, are expected to channel back to the nation a part of the profit generated. If this logic of 'reimbursement' is often justified by notions of equity (redistribute part of the profits of those benefited), ideology (state involvement should be limited) or financial clarity (activities must be turned autonomous), shifts in public policy are generally motivated by more mundane reasons of 'financial drought'. We will examine here the rationale for cost recovery, as applied to the case of Thailand.A market is unrealistic in the present situation given the lack of control over volumes and of connectivity between users. The assertion that 'if the price of rice is low, [Thai] farmers would be happy to cede their right to industrialists' (Wongbandit, 1997) not only runs counter to the evidence that industrialists or cities are anyway served fi rst, but also that physical constraints make such a reallocation impossible. How would the 'rights' of a group of farmers in, say, Kamphaeng Phet (middle basin) be transferred to a given golf course or factory in the suburbs of Bangkok? A typical example is provided by Christensen and Boon-Long (1994): '[A] concern which could raise problems in the area of basin management involves the authority of the basin authorities to impose allocation priorities. . . . The burden of proof for such an initiative is to show that command and control could result in better allocations and less market failure. ' Israngkura (2000), for his part, considers that 'the returns on the irrigation dam investment have been low due to the lack of effective water demand management that could prevent less productive water utilisation'. This suggests that the assumed low return of irrigation has deprived other potentially more productive use, whereas irrigation is, in fact, largely allocated the leftover in the system.A first line of debate is about whether, indeed, irrigated agriculture can be said to have benefited from a preferential treatment within the national economy and, thus, whether -out of a concern for equity -water pricing as an additional government tax is justifiable as means to: (i) return part of its value-added to government coffers; or (ii) allow, in particular, further investments in the non-irrigated agriculture sector (FAO, 1986).It is necessary, therefore, to examine whether irrigated agriculture, and in particular rice cultivation, is -overall -subsidized or taxed. Thailand has long chosen to tax its agricultural exports (Schiff and Valdés, 1992) and to recover her investments in irrigation through indirect mechanisms (Small et al., 1989). The revenues siphoned by the state off rice cultivation through the mechanism of the rice premium, between 1952 and 1986, have been estimated at 25% of all rural income (Ingram, 1971;Phongpaichit and Baker, 1997) and it is clear that rice farmers have indirectly paid back more than any realistic water fee. It was estimated that in 1980 these indirect revenues amounted to three times the O&M costs (Small et al., 1989) while capital cost recovery reached uncommon levels. Indirect taxation may be inequitable but is quite efficient since it avoids the costs of collection and the possible corruption that may come with it (Hirschman, 1967). Because declining food prices in the last two decades (driven, in large measure, by the increase in reliable production from irrigation investments) have depleted the surplus that could be extracted from agriculture, these indirect revenues have now dwindled down, being captured as consumer surplus.This questions the rationale used by consultants to support cost recovery: 'Thai taxpayers are paying B35 billion a year to run RID. If this is worthwhile to the farmers then why should the taxpayers have to pay for RID?' (H&P and A&E, 2000). This question stems from a narrow definition of what 'taxpayers' pay for and ignores the more global arithmetic of sectoral taxes, subsidies and cross-subsidies, not to mention the distribution of benefits to consumers and multiplier effects in the economy. Indeed, rice farmers have probably contributed more to the rest of society than they have received from it, both through taxation and impact on rice market prices.One might argue, however, that this holds for the past but that the situation has changed. Leaving aside the argument that the water subsidy could be seen as a (small) compensation for the past pattern of indirect, yet heavy taxation, a water fee could be now construed as a charge reflecting the costs of providing irrigation water. This argument differs, depending on whether one considers that: (i) the disappearing of the premium reflects an increasing rice supply in the international market and a decline in real price (squeezing farmers' income and rendering the extraction of surplus unsustainable); or (ii) it stemmed from the growing political clout of a rent-seeking rice sector. Since the evidence unambiguously points to the first interpretation (Isvilanonda, 2001), this can be taken as an indication that rice incomes are now squeezed and that further taxation would have substantial socioeconomic and political implications.Another major argument regarding equity is that of discrimination against rainfed agriculture, resulting from both the subsidies in capital costs and the supply of free water, since the irrigated sector can produce more per unit of land than rain-fed agriculture and better absorb the impact of declining rice prices driven by overproduction (and, initially, by taxation). Such concern for equity is often mentioned by officials and ADB consultants ('60% of the budget of the Ministry of Agriculture went to 20% of farmers' provided with irrigation). This militates for closing the gap between the two subsectors, for example, by having irrigators bearing the cost of water delivery. This argument is valid when applied to the initial phase of irrigation development, when rainfed farmers disproportionately bore the costs of the rice premium and low prices, although this was smoothened by the fact that rain-fed production was mostly for home consumption and little for the market. In addition, initial differences have now been evened out by the evolution of farming systems: in the mid-term, average farm size and the degree of farm fragmentation at inheritance appear to be in line with the average income derived from a unit of land. Molle et al. (2002) have studied three sub-areas of the Chao Phraya delta where cropping intensities and return to land per year markedly differ. The study showed that differences in annual land productivity were largely compensated over time (albeit not fully) by growing differences in farm size, family size (linked to the rate of migration) and pluri-activity which partly rebalance final farm incomes.Another relevant issue is the international dimension of subsidies, as many of these commodities, notably rice, are traded in international markets. The insistence on having farmers pay the 'real' cost of water can first be questioned when European and American agriculture is admittedly heavily subsidized (Sarker et al., 1993;Baffes and Meerman, 1997;CRS, 2002). This applies especially for crops that compete in international markets -here the price is substantially set by the lowest (net)-cost producers -and it is not clear why developing countries should adopt policies which are not part of the agenda of their western or East Asian competitors. The US Congress, for example, provided $24 billion between October 1998 and 2001 to shield growers against low prices and crop disasters (The Nation, 2001). In May 2002, another 10-year $190 billion farm bill was signed by President Bush. This concerns, in particular, rice production whose revenue includes a share of 50% of subsidies (USDA, 2001, web site). Complying with orthodoxy (full operational cost recovery and 'real' factor prices), on the one hand, and disregarding it entirely, on the other, through intervention when benefits get squeezed by declining prices, illustrate that a real-cost regulated market is not yet in place for reasons that are far broader than water pricing.An additional difficulty for Thai rice farmers comes from their wide linkage with international markets. Whereas in many markets a change in input prices is readily passed on to the consumers, albeit partly depending on the structure of the market, this does not easily occur for commodities where producers mostly operate as 'price takers', for example, because of links to international markets. In the case of rice, the Thai farm-price elasticity relative to the world-market price is 0.8 (Sombat Saehae, by e-mail, January 2000, personal communication). It follows that farm-gate prices are predominantly driven by the world market and that internal balancing mechanisms to reflect changes in factor prices are critically constrained, to the detriment of producers.The need for 'cost-sharing', however, may become more pressing when the government is faced with financial squeeze and seeks to reduce expenditure, while the deterioration of irrigation facilities impinges on productivity and farm income, and gives way to costly recurrent rehabilitation programmes. Such deterioration appears relatively limited in the present case (RID's maintenance, especially in the Central Region, can be considered quite good if compared with many other countries), and there is no evidence that financial squeezes, even after the 1997 economic crisis, have drastically altered RID budgets or its capacity to carry out maintenance work. In Thailand, O&M costs are said to correspond to a 'huge drain on the national budget' (H&P and A&E, 2001) but these costs must be put in context 10 : the potential gains from the cost-sharing policies proposed represent 0.37% of the value of Thai agricultural exports, 0.27% of Thai government expenditures or 15% of the 10The proposal by ADB's consultants was to set up a tentative fee of B120/rai in pilot projects. This value was intended as a compromise derived from the total estimated O&M costs: B522/rai, out of which B210 were true direct costs (H&P and A&E, 2000).RID budget itself. Savings of 0.27%, not considering the transaction costs corresponding to the collection of fees, may be not negligible but certainly not considerable when compared with the political risk attached to it. Thus, it seems that the financial squeeze that was one of the major drivers of the Philippine NIA and of the Mexican reforms is not (yet) a crucial incentive to change in the Thai case.An important distinction must be made between cost recovery that goes to the government coffers, and irrigation financing, that is the provision of funds actually used for irrigation costs (Small, 1996). Surprisingly, the Royal Irrigation Act of 1942 recognized this fact early. It made it legally possible to charge users for water (despite fixing unrealistically low limits), but stipulated that collected money could not be considered as state revenue and should constitute a special fund to be put back into the development of irrigation. If this is the case, and if users are granted partial or total control of the allocation of these funds, then incentives to pay and limit degradation are created and a sense of 'property' may emerge. More generally, it is the potential role of pricing at the interface between line agencies and users, which deserves emphasis (see next section).Raising fees that only contribute to the government income is a measure that is not conducive to internal improvement and is, therefore, a decision pertaining to the design of the tax system as a whole: making users bear a part of O&M costs is helpful in internalizing costs from the point of view of the government, but shifting this financial burden has to be reasoned, based on wider public objectives of poverty alleviation and wealth redistribution, sectoral policies, possible treasury difficulties and political risks, which are all dependent upon the context of each particular political economy. Schiff and Valdés (1992) showed how governments are caught up in a web of contradictory goals, including protecting farmers, protecting consumers from high food prices, raising revenues through taxation and ensuring the competitiveness of economic sectors in the world market. This makes decision making more complex than just embracing the principle of cost recovery. The question raised here is how governments can change their policy, for example, from providing public goods for free to charging for it, without providing compensation.To conclude this section it is interesting to draw a parallel between charging for irrigation water and charging for groundwater use. Charging for groundwater use is backed by strong economic justifications because of the critical costs of overdraft in terms of land subsidence and increased flood risk and damage. Yet the constraints faced in establishing such charges illustrate what is at stake. Groundwater use mostly concerns industries in BMA and has remained admittedly underpriced, largely because of the political clout of both the Federation of Thai Industries. 11 All in all, charging for irrigation water use may be a more difficult business -both socially and technically -than charging for groundwater, which lends itself much more easily to control and volumetric charging.Further to the 1997 financial crisis, Thailand obtained a $600 million loan from both the ADB and the Japanese Bank for International Cooperation under the name of Agriculture Sector Program Loan (ASPL), conditional upon acceptance of some principles and a reform of the water sector (RWS). A policy matrix was defined, showing commitment and successive milestones to be achieved. The federation opposed a gradual rise of the groundwater price (from B3.5 to 8.5/m 3 , in an attempt to catch up with tap water at B12.5/m 3 ), stating that a price of B5 would 'lead to hardship'. Recently, the Thaksin administration seems to have adopted a more energetic stance and given deadlines for the phasing out of wells in areas where pipe water is available.• Decentralization of water management to river basins;• Watershed protection strategy;• Setting of performance indicators and service standards;• Participatory irrigation management (PIM) and definition of farmers as clients rather than beneficiaries;• Cost-sharing of O&M;• Reorganization, decentralization and privatization of RID.In parallel, the National Water Resource Committee was drafting a Water Law which was supposed to encapsulate many of the crucial aspects of this ambitious reform, notably the establishment of River Basin Committees (RBCs), and the separation of the water policy, management and O&M functions. It is beyond the scope of this chapter to discuss the merits of the proposed reform but the aspects of cost-sharing, service agreements and participatory management are relevant to our current discussion.The RWS aimed at establishing a contractual relationship between RID as provider and farmers as clients. It was expected that such agreements duly defined through established standards and monitored through performance indicators would significantly increase the quality of delivery, thus justifying the principle of cost-sharing put forth (as opposed to cost recovery). This would set in motion a virtuous circle whereby farmers would get financial autonomy and better service, while participating fully in the definition of operational targets and maintenance priorities. This virtuous circle is well identified in the literature (Small et al., 1989;Small and Carruthers, 1991; see Molle and Berkoff,Chapter 1,this volume) but it has several prerequisites that were overlooked in the RWS.The first crucial weak point of the reform was that there was no provision to ensure that RID will deliver water, following standards of service agreed upon. By failing to link RID's financial income to such service, no drastic pressure would be put on RID to reform its management and it is highly doubtful that raising their awareness of the necessity of change by seminars or capacity building would be sufficient to ensure this. When fees contribute significantly to the salary of the officials of the agencies, or are used to pay field staff who are selected by the users themselves, there is a real change in the governance pattern of irrigation. This, of course, was the most contentious part of a reform and the one that was likely to be compromised.Service agreements were supposed to be established between users and RID but little was said about whether the existing human and physical capacity needed to achieve this, exists or not. After the early overemphasis on structural aspects, it has now become all too common to disregard the physical dimensions of management and to overlook their impact on reforms (Briscoe, 1997;Facon, 2002). Water management in the Chao Phraya basin is constrained by various aspects, including the lack of control over abstraction along the waterways, the occurrence of side flows, the crude technical design of most hydraulic regulation structures and the development of conjunctive use by farmers (Molle et al., 2001;Molle, 2004). This makes the definition of service agreements at lower levels extremely problematic. The RWS made no provision to ensure that hydraulic regulation was up to the task envisaged. It just assumed that 'farmers will receive improved irrigation service delivery. Farmers need to feel confident that service is being improved' (H&P and A&E, 2001).Initial service agreements were to be developed at the project level between RID and Water User Groups (WUG): '[A]s soon as WUG get ready . . . as federation of water users moves up the system, to IWUGs and WUAs, service agreements will move with them.' This was the second weak point of the reform. As is the case in many failed reforms of PIM, farmer organizations are first built at the tertiary level. This is easily accepted by irrigation agencies because they usually have no interest in what is occurring beyond the tertiary turnout and blame for deficiencies can then be placed if required on the farmers themselves. Since certainty in supply at the tertiary level generally depends on allocation and distribution at higher levels in the system and cannot be fully ensured, farmers soon discover that there is nothing to be managed and that they are wasting their time. Present reforms still consider water management at the tertiary level and maintenance as crucial issues but these may actually have lost importance in the eyes of farmers. As a result of the ongoing decentralization process, local administrations have seen their budget increasing and are now using the resources under their control to fund maintenance (notably mechanical ditch dredging). Likewise, the organizational needs of water management have been radically changed further to the introduction of direct seeding in lieu of transplanting, the development of secondary water sources and the spread of pumps. This has weakened the exigency of collective action and fostered individual strategies.In contrast, the issue that has gained prominence in a context of water scarcity is the allocation of water in the dry season (Molle, 2004). The process towards involving users in management should be initiated by allowing a transparent allocation process in which users would have representatives at each level (main canal level, scheme level, plus the delta and basin levels for farmers in the Chao Phraya delta). The definition of (seasonal) entitlements in which users have a say (as a first step to defining water rights) is the preliminary step to the definition of service agreements. Such agreements must be accompanied by a technical capacity to operationalize them, to monitor distribution and to assess whether the actual and the agreed supply match. This, again, has technical, managerial, legal and political implications that need combined support from the government, the political class and the society, which does not seem to be forthcoming. A part of RID officers' foot-dragging in considering the issue might be linked to the fact that establishing service agreements and a water charge may eventually backfire, in that farmers would be given 'the legal standing to bargain forcefully with the water conveyance bureaucracy for timely and efficient service' (Rosegrant and Binswanger, 1994).The reform process initiated under the ASPL has been phased out during 2002 and 2003. Pilot projects have been implemented partly, and without supervision, leading to no real change. Cost-sharing policies and service agreements have disappeared from the front scene. The draft Water Law has been shelved. The restructuring of RID has been limited to measures such as the non-replacement of retiring staff. Only the setting of RBCs has proceeded, under the guidance of the ONWRC. At present, however, RBCs still lack the formal recognition that would give them more importance than a mere consultative forum. The failure of the reform can be partly attributed to some of its internal weaknesses (overoptimism, structural constraints to the definition of service agreements, misplaced emphasis on building from the tertiary level, etc.) but was chiefly undermined by the lack of support from the Thai side, from both bureaucratic and political quarters. Its final dismissal came with the decision of the Thaksin administration to discontinue loans from the ADB. This failure exemplifies disregard of what Briscoe (1997) considers the first requirement for reform: that there be a demand for it. However sound and well intentioned they may be, reforms decided and imposed by external institutions have little chance of succeeding.In addition to the lack of strong political commitment and support, and of structural rehabilitation, the reform failed to ensure the crucial point of financial autonomy. Financial autonomy makes the water charge a 'glue factor' in a wider process of transfer of responsibility to users, who can decide on the hiring of staff and the priorities in maintenance which are ensured by their own funds. This factor, crucial in the Mexican reform, was absent from the ASPL and raises the question of whether a partial reform can achieve partial benefits or whether it is doomed to failure because of the absence of crucial linkages in the virtuous circle to be created.Pricing mechanisms are often held as a potential tool to help 'rationalize' the use of water in ways that increase the economic efficiency of both water use and allocation. Application of such measures has been met with some success in the domestic and industrial water sectors but has so far failed to produce convincing examples in the large-scale public-irrigation sector of developing countries. In the particular case of Thailand, both the rationale and the applicability of such measures were found to be problematic.The idea that water waste would be a consequence of the non-pricing of water was little supported by evidence. The closure of river basins, most notably the Chao Phraya basin, is accompanied by reductions in losses, both at the farm and the basin level, with only 12% of dam releases in the dry season lost to non-beneficial use: a reality which contrasts sharply with the image of outright waste that is routinely conjured up to justify pricing as a way to induce water savings. The technical impossibility of establishing volumetric water deliveries, as well as the wholesaling of water in the present context, removed the possibility of influencing users' behaviour through pricing. Even if this is possible, there are indications that the elasticity of water use is very low at the range of prices proposed to meet appropriate cost recovery objectives, in addition to the political difficulties in implementing them.The possibility of inducing land-use shifts towards crops with higher water productivity runs into similar difficulties. It was shown that farmers' decision making gives much emphasis to risk, and that water savings or water productivity objectives do not necessarily coincide with income maximization. To assume that there are substantial gains to be expected from shifts in cropping patterns if water is priced is to misunderstand the dynamics of, and constraints to, diversification. If much higher profits could readily be made through diversification, farmers would not wait for this. To penalize rice because of its higher water needs would only raise the vulnerability of the main crop, without making alternatives more secure or removing the other constraints to diversification, particularly the need of stable markets. Likewise, few economic gains can be expected from intersec-toral reallocation of water, as non-agriculture sectors are already given de facto priority.The principle of cost recovery is generally propped up by an image of irrigators who have unduly benefited from government largesse and are expected to pay back the 'taxpayers'. This was confronted with the net transfer of wealth from agriculture to other sectors, symbolized in Thailand by 30 years of rice premium, and with the multifaceted benefits of irrigation accruing to the society. It was also recognized that political considerations and national challenges, such as food security, rather than mere aspects of return to capital, dictated earlier priorities in state investments and that shifts in policy are not easily justified and implemented.A water charge would be akin to a flat tax that would decrease farm income, without effectively sending a signal of water scarcity, and decrease international competitiveness (especially with regard to western countries that continue their policy of subsidy), while it would not be easily passed on to the consumer because of the strong linkages between domestic and world rice markets. While reductions in price subsidies in developed countries are compensated for by adequate income policies, the latter are generally omitted in developing countries (partly due to the difficulty in implementing such income-support schemes). Shifting, even partly, the O&M costs to the users is helpful in internalizing costs from the point of view of the government and signalling to all concerned the real cost of system O&M. It may help ensuring financial sustainability if public budgets happen to be lacking, but has socio-economic and political implications that need to be addressed.Beyond 'the obsessive traditional concern on the part of resource economics with correct pricing levels for irrigation water' (Svendsen and Rosegrant, 1994), water pricing is made more attractive when it is construed as a binding element of a wider mechanism that redefines relations between users and the agency (Small and Carruthers, 1991;Bromley, 2000). It gains sense if a full reform is implemented that includes a degree of turnover and financial autonomy whereby water delivery service is paid for by users and linked to the quality of service. Service agreements should include definition of the allocation of resources and of the timing of the distribution of allotments. In both processes, the users should have a say, given their importance in a context of scarcity. Modifying the status of public agencies and civil servants in order to link their salary to performance and to the payment of users requires a much more ambitious reform in the direction of which the government has so far taken no unequivocal steps.The failure of the ASPL reform illustrates several lessons that failed to be learnt, in particular, the importance of infrastructure in the design of service agreements or bulk allocation, as well as the necessity to muster internal and political support for the reform. Emphasis thus, should be placed on paving the way for a thorough reform, ensuring in particular, the technical and managerial capacity to define and operationalize services, as well as the legal framework and the political/public support for changes in line agencies. Failing to alter the pattern of governance jeopardizes reforms which remain generally restricted to isolated components, backed by arguments that are turned invalid. It is not clear, therefore, whether 'half-measures' provide 'halfbenefits', and must be seen as 'second-best' options, as economic parlance suggests, or if they are likely, because of the absence of linkages and invalid supporting assumptions, to fail and lead to an overall negative result, rather than to the theoretical gains envisioned. All in all, it appears unwise to propel water pricing to the fore of the reform, as a symbol of restored economic orthodoxy, when it is expected to play a more crucial and later role in a wider and longer reform process.","tokenCount":"9408"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1271443845.json b/data/part_2/1271443845.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..818393700c2ffa51eaf3bb4d346a042c304e88ce --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1271443845.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f3270ef180405753b48037d3d410b9c7","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/1b816b7d-d10a-4ba3-a51b-3cce7c63a225/retrieve","id":"1780162128"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"1f1ec9f7-5b84-4911-b9fe-fcbdf5ca8f2d","pagecount":"16","content":"L'eau précieuse La petite irrigation, une affaire de techniques et de bonne gestion uReportage au Cap-Vert FOCUs ,11 Micro-assurance La sécurité pour les petits agriculteurs, mais pas au prix fort pOiNT DE VUE ,16 Entreprise agricole par Boureima Wankoye EN BREF ,3 pUBLiCATiONs ,12 ENTRE NOUs ,15 innovation agricole Créer tous ensemble EN BREF Communicating for rural innovation: Rethinking agricultural extension Par C. Leeuwis et A.W. van den BanIl aura fallu près de 40 ans pour que les agriculteurs des pays ACP, principaux acteurs et bénéficiaires du développement rural, commencent à être véritablement associés à la mise au point d'innovations pour améliorer leur production agricole et leurs conditions de vie. Car les préjugés ont la vie dure. Longtemps les chercheurs et les techniciens ont estimé que les paysans étaient hostiles aux nouveautés dont ils avaient, eux, l'apanage. Or pour s'adapter à de nouvelles conditions climatiques, agronomiques ou économiques, les paysans ne cessent d'innover.Longtemps aussi, les chercheurs ont exclu les agriculteurs des processus de recherche, pensant qu'ils savaient ce dont ils avaient besoin. Mais les solutions variétales, techniques ou organisationnelles proposées aux producteurs se sont souvent révélées peu adaptées ou difficiles à appliquer.Le constat a mis du temps à s'imposer et les méthodes sont lentes à changer. Une meilleure connaissance de l'environnement économique et social des paysans a été la première étape. Elle s'est révélée insuffisante pour cerner tout ce qui contribue à rendre une innovation pertinente et utile. Aujourd'hui, les producteurs et leurs organisations ne sont plus seulement consultés, ils commencent à participer activement à l'élaboration d'innovations. Le Club du Sahel et de l'Afrique de l'Ouest (CSAO) parle de \"co-recherche\". On reconnaît les capacités des agriculteurs à proposer et à utiliser de nouveaux modes de production, de nouvelles techniques, de nouveaux types d'organisation.La recherche et la vulgarisation ont changé d'approche. Il s'agit désormais de partir des demandes du terrain. Les producteurs souhaitent pérenniser leur exploitation, améliorer leur système de production et diversifier leurs activités avec l'objectif essentiel d'améliorer individuellement leur niveau de vie. La sécurité alimentaire, l'alimentation des villes ou la croissance des exportations ont souvent fait négliger cet objectif pourtant au coeur des préoccupations de tout un chacun. L'évolution récente apparaît clairement dans certains documents de stratégie agricole. Celui du Ghana, par exemple, prévoit la création de Comités de liaison recherche/vulgarisation (RELC) dans chaque province. Ces comités réunissent chercheurs, vulgarisateurs, agriculteurs et représentants des organisations paysannes pour déterminer les recherches d'intérêt local à mener.Si la recherche a besoin des paysans pour mener des travaux efficaces en vue de lutter contre la pauvreté rurale et d'accroître significativement la production, les agriculteurs, eux, ont besoin des chercheurs et des organismes publics et, de plus en plus, du secteur privé pour améliorer, valoriser et diffuser leurs propres innovations. Et aussi pour que celles-ci s'intègrent dans l'environnement plus large, économique et écologique en particulier, qu'ils connaissent mal en général.Même judicieuses et bien adaptées aux besoins, les nouvelles pratiques trouvées par les agriculteurs ne suffisent pas pour accroître notablement la productivité et les revenus. Faute de moyens financiers ou techniques, elles reposent souvent sur une utilisation accrue de main-d'oeuvre, qui a ses limites. C'est le cas du paillage des sols pour limiter l'érosion et les pertes en eau ou de la cuvette zaï utilisée dans plusieurs pays d'Afrique de l'Ouest pour récupérer des terres dégradées.Généralement, cependant, ces solutions ingénieuses restent cantonnées à une petite région. L'association avec la recherche permet donc de les améliorer et d'en faire profiter le plus grand nombre. Au Rwanda, l'interaction entre les producteurs et l'Institut national des sciences agronomiques a facilité une lutte efficace contre la mosaïque du manioc en diffusant rapidement des variétés résistantes et adaptées au goût des populations.Pour favoriser le repérage, la capitalisation et la dissémination des innovations, des réseaux ont été mis en place. L'Initiative pour le repérage et le partage des innovations (IRPI) du Fonds international pour le développement agricole (FIDA) en Afrique de l'Ouest et du Centre recherche les innovations utiles aux femmes, aux jeunes et aux groupes défavorisés. Prolinnova, qui travaille dans de nombreux pays ACP, construit un réseau mondial d'apprentissage pour encourager l'innovation locale en agriculture et en gestion des ressources naturelles.L'association PELUM pour la gestion participative et écologique des terres, qui est présente dans plusieurs pays d'Afrique australe et de l'Est, veut créer en Tanzanie un centre d'information qui capitalisera les expériences des agriculteurs et les fera connaître à l'ensemble du réseau. Le programme de recherche-action PROFEIS, lancé en 2006, veut lui aussi promouvoir l'innovation paysanne. Au Mali, il s'intéresse à la domestication des espèces forestières naturelles menée par les agriculteurs qui mettent au point des techniques de germination et de gestion de ces arbres devenus rares.Des manifestations comme les foires aux innovations organisées par le CTA et le FIDA aident à faire connaître de bonnes idées. Trois innovations ont été primées en juin à Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso : un séchoir à manioc mis au point par un Camerounais pour des groupements de femmes, un partenariat entre une association de Sénégalaises et le ministère de l'Agriculture pour une meilleure prise en compte des problèmes des femmes dans les programmes, et les points d'information villageois créés par l'Association nationale des producteurs agricoles de Côte d'Ivoire pour mieux informer les producteurs sur les marchés.Malgré tout, les échanges d'expérience restent en général limités. Collecter les petites innovations disséminées çà et là et les analyser demande du temps et de l'argent.Pour les producteurs comme pour les chercheurs, il reste du chemin à parcourir pour améliorer le travail en commun. Entre recherche conceptuelle sur l'innovation et nouveautés mises au point au village, le fossé est encore grand. C'est pourquoi des programmes incluent la formation des agriculteurs à différents niveaux -de l'école primaire à l'école professionnelle -ainsi que des responsables des organisations paysannes pour renforcer leurs capacités d'innovation et de communication.Les chercheurs eux aussi doivent évoluer et se former. Les processus d'adoption des innovations sont très complexes, car ce ne sont pas seulement des aspects techniques qui entrent en ligne de compte mais aussi des aspects économiques et sociaux. Pour engager des recherches dans la bonne voie, il est indispensable de comprendre sur quelles bases les producteurs analysent leurs problèmes, quelles sont leurs priorités et quelles solutions ils préconisent.Des organismes comme l'Université et Centre de recherches de Wageningen, aux Pays-Bas, travaillent sur l'analyse de ces mécanismes. La Division ISNAR de l'Institut international de recherche en politiques alimentaires (IFPRI) étudie \"comment les organismes publics de recherche, le secteur privé, la société civile et les communautés, les populations et les ménages ruraux interagissent au sein de ce que l'on pourrait appeler un \"système d'innovation\". Les systèmes d'innovation font l'objet de nombreuses recherches et doivent être intégrés dans le cursus de l'enseignement agronomique et professionnel.Ce nouveau mode de fonctionnement en équipe demande aussi des réformes institutionnelles, en particulier un rapprochement entre organismes de recherche et de vulgarisation et producteurs. La décentralisation et un transfert de responsabilités au niveau local sont nécessaires, de même qu'un équilibre des pouvoirs entre les différents acteurs de l'innovation : État, ONG, chercheurs, agriculteurs et sociétés privées.Le plus important est que l'objectif de ce travail collectif soit bien d'accroître les revenus des exploitants, y compris les plus pauvres, et d'améliorer leur bien-être. Une nécessité si l'on veut faire décoller l'agriculture des pays ACP. Au sud-est d'Haïti, dans la localité de Cap-Rouge, 1 200 petits producteurs vont pouvoir écouler plus facilement leur café sur le marché local et international. À partir des sept ordinateurs du nouveau télécentre agricole équipé d'un accès Internet haut débit, le responsable de la coopérative locale enregistre les lots déposés par les producteurs (origine, poids, phase de traitement). Un système de radioidentification (RFID) transfère ces données sur des \"tags\", sortes de cartes à puce qui accompagnent chaque sac de café. Les producteurs peuvent aussi se connecter pour suivre leur café.Le mode de communication sans fil utilisé, le WiMax, est En août et septembre derniers, le Cap-Vert a pour la première fois interdit la pêche aux maquereaux dans ses eaux marines. Les autorités entendent ainsi favoriser la régénération de cette espèce de poisson menacée d'extinction et promouvoir à terme une pêche à la fois soutenue et durable. Les pêcheurs se disent pris de court et regrettent déjà cet excellent appât utilisé pour pêcher de gros poissons comme le thon.Magdalene Muiruru, propriétaire d'une laiterie à la porte de Nairobi, récolte les fruits de son investissement de 300 $ US (190 €) dans une unité de production de biogaz acquise il y a deux ans pour réduire le temps que son personnel consacrait à la collecte de bois. Son exploitation a ainsi réduit ses coûts énergétiques, limité son empreinte carbone et gagné en valeur. C'est le fabricant kenyan d'équipement pour laiterie DeLaval qui a fourni le digesteur ; celui-ci produit le gaz destiné à la cuisson, à l'éclairage de la salle de traite et au chauffage de l'eau qui sert à nettoyer les pis des vaches.\"L'afflux de bouses dans un digesteur produit du gaz. Le purin est ensuite répandu sur notre parcelle de trois acres (1,2 ha). Nous utilisons cet engrais biologique liquide pour la production de fourrage (herbe à éléphant), la culture de légumes et l'aquaculture\", explique Magdalene. Elle possède 16 vaches dont 7 pour la traite. Elle vend le lait qu'elle en tire (soit 180 l) à une école locale et à la communauté voisine.Comme pour de nombreuses familles rurales, ses bêtes sont pour Magdalene une source majeure d'aliments et de revenus et les aspects négatifs -odeurs et mouches attirées par le fumier -ont aujourd'hui disparu. Elle souhaitait aussi réduire les émissions de carbone de son exploitation et fait des projets écologiques pour l'avenir. \"J'espère fournir une énergie écologique aux communautés en stimulant l'usage des digesteurs de biogaz dans la région. J'envisage aussi de réduire mes coûts de refroidissement et les émissions liées à la réfrigération en mettant au point de nouveaux produits laitiers. Les consommateurs ont le droit de savoir qu'en plus de contribuer à leur santé et bien-être, l'industrie laitière s'attache à préserver la santé de la planète.\"Magdalene Muiruru PO Box 62788 -00200 Nairobi Kenya magdanjoki@yahoo.comEn RD Congo, au nord-est de Kinshasa, la Coopérative paysanne pour le développement de Mushie (COPADEM) a lancé une campagne de propreté pour les lieux d'aisance de la ville. Avant son intervention, les \"maladies des mains sales\" (choléra, fièvre typhoïde, dysenterie) proliféraient en raison de la mauvaise hygiène dans les rudimentaires toilettes de cette cité portuaire et commerciale de plus de 100 000 habitants.COPADEM recourt à une technique simple qui consiste à accrocher dans le trou des toilettes une botte de deux ou trois fleurs mâles sèches de palmier à huile enflammées. La fumée tue mouches et autres insectes et en outre la cendre absorbe les mauvaises odeurs.Soutenue par l'ONG américaine Innovative Resource Management (IRM), la coopérative achète des bottes de fleurs de palmier aux tireurs de vin de palme, à 200 francs congolais (0,25 €) la botte, et apprend aux gens à les utiliser pour assainir leurs toilettes.Ce procédé a très vite été adopté par la population. À Mushie, certaines maladies endémiques ont reculé. Dans son émission Écho de l'environnement, la radio communautaire locale Bandundu FM encourage ses auditeurs à suivre cet exemple.Les inflorescences mâles du palmier à huile brûlées pour assainir les toilettes Confrontés à la flambée des prix du blé, les boulangers du Ghana utilisent un mélange de manioc local et de farine de maïs pour faire le pain. La farine composite est fabriquée par le ministère de l'Alimentation et de l'Agriculture, avec l'appui technique de l'Université de science et technologie Kwame Nkrumah. Sa délicieuse saveur séduit les clients depuis son introduction fin juin 2008. Grâce à cette farine, le coût des matières premières a diminué de plus de moitié pour les boulangers, qui ont répercuté l'économie sur leurs clients.Une nouvelle technologie permet d'utiliser la bagasse -résidu de la production de sucre de cannepour fabriquer des emballages alimentaires biodégradables en 45 jours. L'emballage a été mis au point par le fabricant thaïlandais Biodegradable Packaging for Environment. Élément clé du processus de fabrication : le liant, une substance polymère qui contraint les particules de la pulpe de bagasse à s'agréger pour rendre l'emballage résistant à la chaleur et imperméable à l'eau. Ce liant répond à des normes strictes de santé et sécurité imposées par l'Administration américaine des denrées alimentaires et des médicaments.Le mil a été déclaré culture sous contrôle par le gouvernement namibien. Cette décision, destinée à améliorer les revenus et la sécurité alimentaire des agriculteurs locaux, aligne le mil sur le maïs et le blé qui jouissent déjà du privilège. Selon les nouvelles réglementations, tous les stocks de mil namibien doivent être vendus avant toute autorisation d'importation. Ces réglementations fixent aussi un prix plancher du grain de mil identique à celui du grain de maïs.Le Centre de recherche agronomique de la zone Forêt (CRA-F), au Togo, est parvenu à sélectionner sept nouveaux hybrides de cacaoyer qui résistent efficacement à la maladie virale du swollen shoot ou gonflement des rameaux. Ces hybrides ont aussi l'avantage d'être précoces : ils entrent en production au bout de 18 mois.Les cacaoculteurs togolais, regroupés dans la Fédération des unions de producteurs de café et cacao du Togo (FUPROCAT), sont nombreux à passer commande auprès du CRA-F. Depuis deux ans que ces variétés sont disponibles, plus de 50 000 cabosses ont déjà été distribuées dans la région des Plateaux pour renouveler les vergers dévastés à plus de 30 % par le swollen shoot. Selon le directeur du CRA-F, le principal défi à présent est de produire assez de cabosses pour remplacer progressivement les anciennes plantations malades et relancer ainsi la culture du cacao au Togo. Grenade, à partir des produits cultivés dans son arrière-cour. Elle fabrique des jus de gingembre, de citrons verts, de fruits de la passion et de cerises des Antilles, avant que les prix et les taux de casse des bouteilles importées ne stoppent sa production. L'effondrement du commerce de la banane des Caraïbes et les pertes importantes de ce fruit lui donnent alors l'idée de produire des chips de banane. Mavis lance une gamme prospère de chips de banane, de plantain et de fruit de l'arbre à pain, puis introduit des chips de banane au poivre pour livraison directe aux écoles locales, son principal marché.En 2004, l'ouragan Ivan dévaste sa petite propriété. Mais Mavis ne cède pas. Aujourd'hui, malgré les prix plus élevés de la banane, elle vit de sa production de chips et expérimente d'autres produits. \"Quand on se lance dans une aventure, de nombreux défis vous attendent, mais une nouvelle porte s'ouvre et vous essayez autre chose\", dit-elle. Son mari Raleigh a sollicité l'aide technique de Trinidad pour améliorer ses chips de taro (un tubercule, Colocasia esculenta) et le couple s'apprête à lancer une nouvelle gamme pour les supermarchés locaux : une sauce au poivre, une sauce de carambole (Averrhoa carambola), un condiment de légumes et un sirop à base de prune malgache (Flacourtia indica), un fruit prolifique mais peu vendu, qu'on malaxe manuellement avant consommation. Tous les produits de Mavis sont cultivés sur sa parcelle de 0,25 ha. Prochains objectifs : agrandir l'exploitation et explorer le marché international.MnR's Co Ltd. Telescope Street St Andrews Grenade rm_lalitte@hotmail.com Autre nouveauté, \"dans toutes les associations et coopératives que nous encadrons, les femmes deviennent de plus en plus nombreuses et sont souvent plus actives\", constate fièrement Ntama Festus, technicien agricole à SDA. Selon le président de la Coopérative des apiculteurs du bord de Nyungwe, \"plus de la moitié des 300 apiculteurs sont des femmes\".Des scientifiques du centre de recherches horticoles subtropicales (SHRS) de Miami (USA) ont établi, en collaboration avec des chercheurs d'Afrique et d'Amérique du Sud, des cartes génétiques des différentes variétés de cacao à l'aide de marqueurs ADN. Au départ, l'objectif était de détecter les gènes de tolérance à des maladies courantes comme le balai de sorcières et la pourriture brune afin de mettre au point des variétés résistantes. Avec le soutien d'importantes firmes privées, les chercheurs visent maintenant à séquencer le génome entier du cacao pour le bénéfice de tous les producteurs. Le projet a été lancé afin d'enrayer la destruction massive des acacias pour le charbon de bois et le bois de chauffe. Désormais, les femmes tirent profit de l'arbre autrement ; les moustiquaires leur servent à emprisonner les vers à soie qui se nourrissent du feuillage.Le ver qu'elles élèvent est un hybride de l'espèce sauvage commune dans toute la région (Gonometa postica) et du ver à soie domestique (Bombyx mori). Il est parfaitement adapté à l'aridité des lieux et produit une soie de grande qualité. Un acacia moyen peut porter jusqu'à 200 cocons par saison.Appuyées par le Programme des Nations unies pour le développement (PNUD), les agricultrices récoltent les cocons une fois par mois et les vendent au marché de la soie sauvage de Mwingi. Les négociants internationaux qui convergent vers ce marché couvert représentent des acheteurs lointains (Canada, Europe, Inde ou Japon).Entre-temps, dans le district de Rachuonyo (province de Nyanza), le groupement féminin de Kamiro a créé la première unité de transformation de la soie avec le soutien du Centre international de physiologie et d'écologie des insectes (ICIPE). Les femmes vendent le mètre de soie unie à 700 Ksh (7 €) et le mètre de soie teinte à 1 500 Ksh (15 €). Le tissu est très demandé pour les saris, les robes de mariées, les vestes et robes du soir. Jacobs, qui a bouclé la phase pilote avec succès, fait à présent la promotion de ses pompes auprès des gouvernements et des organisations. Leur prix reste à déterminer, mais l'objectif est qu'elles soient abordables pour les petits agriculteurs.Peter Jacobs 4316 Varsity Drive NW Calgary, AB T3A 1A2, Canada malawican@gmail.com ou petercjacobs@yahoo.caAu Burkina Faso, dans la zone du plateau central, Thomas Zongo utilise une technique simple, économique et efficace pour bien faire pousser ses tomates. Il laboure et arrose la terre, puis il y enfonce un canari, un pot de terre qui fait office de moule pour creuser une cuvette. En vissant et dévissant le pot, Thomas tasse la terre peu à peu et quand les parois intérieures de la cuvette sont bien lisses, il retire le récipient et renouvelle l'opération un peu plus loin. Ces trous bien réguliers ont un diamètre de 30 cm environ et une profondeur de 15 cm. La distance entre les trous est de 40 cm et entre les lignes de 1 m. Le premier d'une série de marchés fermiers prévus pour la capitale du Nigeria a ouvert ses portes à Maitama, l'un des cinq districts d'Abuja. Des licences à prix réduit sont proposées aux commerçants pour favoriser cette initiative qui vise à réduire l'encombrement des marchés de la capitale et à parer aux inconvénients de la récente interdiction des étals de rue. Une attention particulière est prêtée à l'hygiène et les commerçants disposent, entre autres services, d'un accès à des congélateurs. La petite irrigation permet aux agriculteurs de tirer parti de l'eau disponible dans les rivières ou sous terre pour étendre la durée de production en ajoutant aux cultures pluviales traditionnelles des cultures de contre-saison en saison sèche. Son coût est généralement faible si l'on adopte des techniques simples.Pour donner toute son efficacité, la petite irrigation doit obéir à un certain nombre de règles, car installer un système irrigué représente un investissement souvent important pour un petit agriculteur.Le forage doit être d'un prix abordable et le matériel (pompes, tuyaux…) robuste et réparable par des artisans locaux expérimentés. Récemment, au Niger, des équipes de foreurs formés localement ont réussi à réaliser un forage maraîcher manuel à l'aide de tarières en installant des tuyaux en plastique de 5 cm de diamètre en moins de trois heures pour un coût global d'environ 38 €. Dans des conditions plus difficiles, avec une profondeur de forage pouvant atteindre 12 m, le coût total peut avoisiner 122 €. Par comparaison, la réalisation d'un puits en béton coûte de deux à six fois plus cher.On cherche aussi de plus en plus à mobiliser d'autres ressources que les nappes souterraines et les cours d'eau. Dans la zone semi-aride de l'Afrique de l'Ouest, deux techniques sont particulièrement répandues : la pose de rangées de pierres pour retenir les eaux de ruissellement et les cuvettes zaï ou tassa creusées autour de chaque plante pour recueillir l'eau. La récupération des eaux usées (voir encadré) offre également un potentiel important.Le matériel de pompage a lui aussi évolué et est mieux adapté aux pays en développement : pompes à pédale, petites motopompes indiennes et chinoises simples et à faible coût, systèmes solaires. Des pompes à pédale pour des profondeurs pouvant atteindre 15 à 20 m sont maintenant disponibles dans la plupart des pays ACP. Leur prix est de 30 à 50 € pour un débit de 100 l/min à 4 m de fond.Les techniques d'irrigation les plus performantes sont l'irrigation souterraine et le goutte-à-goutte. Elles se caractérisent par l'apport fréquent de petites quantités d'eau aussi directement que possible à la racine des plantes. En souterrain, les plus simples consistent à enterrer des récipients poreux (jarres d'argile, tubes perforés) à proximité immédiate des cultures et à les remplir d'eau qui se diffuse lentement dans le sol.L'irrigation goutte à goutte fait circuler de l'eau sous pression dans un réseau de tuyaux perforés qui courent au-dessus du sol et dont l'eau s'échappe goutte à goutte. La technologie est relativement simple, mais demande un investissement initial important. Elle demande aussi un entretien soigneux et régulier, car les asperseurs, très fins, se bouchent facilement. Les résultats obtenus dans de nombreux pays montrent que passer de l'irrigation par aspersion au goutte-à-goutte réduit la consommation d'eau de 30 à 60 %. L'équipement d'un hectare coûte de 1 500 à 4 000 €.Pour limiter ce coût, des techniques abordables de microirrigation ont été mises au point pour des petites superficies de 500 m 2 maximum. L'irrigation goutte à goutte se fait par gravitation à partir d'un réservoir installé en hauteur. Cela permet d'économiser le matériel de pompage électrique. Ce système coûte de 150 à 190 €. Au Kenya, l'institut de recherche agricole KARI s'est engagé dès 1996 dans cette technologie. Il a importé et assemblé des centaines de kits. Depuis, l'usage du goutte-à-goutte à partir de petites citernes surélevées s'est répandu dans le pays. Enfin, pour pérenniser l'investissement que représente un système d'irrigation, quel qu'il soit, et lui garder une efficacité maximale, l'entretien est essentiel. En Haïti, dans la vallée de l'Artibonite qui compteLe drainage a pour but d'évacuer l'excès d'eau dans le sol. Les fossés creusés dans le sol sont la solution la plus économique. Les drains, enterrés à une profondeur et à un écartement calculés, demandent un certain investissement financier. Les plus anciens sont des éléments en terre cuite emboîtés les uns dans les autres. Aujourd'hui, ce sont des tubes en plastique flexibles, perforés et parfois entourés de mousse synthétique pour empêcher les racines de pénétrer à l'intérieur du drain. Le drainage des terres irriguées a deux objectifs : réduire l'engorgement par l'eau et diminuer la salinisation. Il est particulièrement recommandé dans trois situations. En climat humide, il permet d'évacuer l'excédent d'eau résultant de précipitations trop abondantes qui saturent le sol et conduisent à l'asphyxie des plantes. En zones de bas-fond, le drainage abaisse la nappe phréatique et évacue les eaux de crue. En zone aride, enfin, il lutte contre la salinisation en assurant le lessivage des sols et empêche la remontée de la nappe salée. À l'Office du Niger, au Mali, la nappe phréatique est remontée de 20 m en 50 ans du fait de l'irrigation abondante des périmètres rizicoles. Seul un drainage énergique peut éviter la dégradation des sols par alcalinisation progressive jusqu'à leur totale aridification. Aujourd'hui, tout projet d'irrigation doit tenir compte du fait que l'eau se raréfie et donc chercher à maximiser l'utilisation de l'eau en évitant tout gaspillage. Il faut pour cela adopter les techniques les plus économes en eau. Ou améliorer les systèmes plus classiques : le système de canalisations fermées ou la couverture des canaux ont prouvé leur efficacité pour réduire l'évaporation.Mais l'adoption de techniques économes en eau ne suffit pas à résoudre tous les problèmes. Le manque d'organisation des utilisateurs et une gestion défaillante des périmètres pèsent sur les performances des installations. Longtemps gérés par les États, les périmètres ont souvent été des gouffres financiers pour de piètres performances, que ce soit dans la vallée Awash en Éthiopie, à Jahaly/Pacharr en Gambie ou à l'Office du Niger.Aujourd'hui, leur gestion est confiée de préférence aux usagers, souvent après découpage en plus petits périmètres plus faciles à gérer. Des associations se développent pour organiser une répartition optimale et équitable de l'eau d'un bassin ou d'une nappe et assurer l'entretien des installations. C'est le cas en Éthiopie où le gouvernement insiste sur l'irrigation, vitale pour le pays, et sur la formation des agriculteurs pour gérer les périmètres. Dans la région Pacifique, le Partenariat mondial de l'eau (GWP) a soutenu la création d'un réseau afin de promouvoir les principes de la gestion intégrée de l'eau au niveau de chaque bassin. Réunis en association, les différents exploitants d'un même bassin ou nappe phréatique évaluent la quantité d'eau disponible et les prélèvements maximums possibles sans risque de la tarir, puis décident de la répartition entre les différents usages (agriculture, eau domestique, industrie) afin d'éviter tout conflit.Toutefois, l'entretien ou la réhabilitation des périmètres sont souvent trop onéreux pour les usagers et les agriculteurs ont du mal à gérer le quotidien de ces périmètres qui se dégradent parfois rapidement. La formation des producteurs et des vulgarisateurs de même qu'un environnement économique propice qui permette aux agriculteurs de valoriser leurs investissements sont les clés de la réussite des périmètres irrigués.Réduire le gaspillage d'une ressource plus nécessaire que le pétrole et qui se raréfie, et la valoriser au mieux pour assurer la sécurité alimentaire sont des priorités dans les pays ACP. La marge de manoeuvre est grande : les pertes d'eau dans les réseaux d'irrigation peuvent représenter jusqu'à deux tiers du volume mobilisé, principalement par évaporation, fuites et écoulements hors de la parcelle.Les eaux usées de bains et de cuisines peuvent être facilement récupérées et traitées à l'échelle domestique pour être réutilisées comme eau agricole. Elles sont dites \"eaux grises\" par opposition aux \"eaux noires\" des toilettes qui contiennent de fortes concentrations de matières fécales et d'urine. Les eaux grises représentent 55 à 80 % des eaux usées domestiques. Leur composition varie selon chaque foyer en fonction du niveau de vie, des pratiques culturelles, des habitudes culinaires et des produits de nettoyage utilisés. Elles contiennent essentiellement savons, détergents, graisses, cheveux et fibres de vêtements. Il est indispensable d'évaluer leur qualité (pH, salinité, concentration en matières organiques biodégradables ou non, teneur en azote et en phosphore), car les eaux usées domestiques ne sont pas toutes bonnes pour l'irrigation, surtout s'il s'agit de cultures maraîchères. Une fois jugées aptes à être réutilisées pour l'irrigation ou l'arrosage, les eaux grises sont récupérées et traitées au moyen de simples filtres installés dans chaque habitation. La technique a déjà fait ses preuves en Amérique latine et en Australie, notamment, et devrait s'étendre à d'autres régions en situation de stress hydrique. Des travaux sur ce thème sont en cours à l'Institut de l'ingénierie de l'eau et de l'environnement (2iE) de Ouagadougou, au Burkina Faso. Au sud du Malawi, le projet Irrigation des petits exploitants (SHIP) aide les agriculteurs à s'accommoder des conséquences des changements du régime des pluies. Grâce à des fonds de la Banque africaine de développement, il leur fournit des pompes à pédale afin qu'ils puissent tirer de l'eau des fleuves, des lacs et des barrages pour leurs cultures. Le projet, qui vise 12 000 paysans, est aussi à l'origine de la construction de barrages pour améliorer l'irrigation et de nouveaux marchés pour faciliter la vente des produits. Les petits producteurs se sont regroupés pour cultiver toutes sortes de plantes, tomates, choux et oignons surtout. Certains fournissent déjà les chaînes locales de supermarchés. Des vulgarisateurs les conseillent et leur apprennent comment tirer le meilleur de leurs terres déficitaires en eau. Sani, chef de village de la circonscription traditionnelle Nanseta de Thyolo, explique que sa région a été durement touchée par l'arrêt précoce des pluies cette année : \"Nous dépendons des pluies pour nos récoltes, mais avec ces changements de temps nous avons vraiment souffert. Certains d'entre nous cultivent à présent en irrigué et tirent de l'eau des rivières les plus proches ; moi j'ai planté des légumes.\" Dans les districts de la vallée du Lower Shire, on montre aux agriculteurs comment pomper l'eau du fleuve Shire pour leurs jardins. Zex Thambo a appris à canaliser l'eau de la montagne Ndirande. \"Je me sers de conduits pour capter l'eau et irriguer mes cultures. J'ai aussi des barrages où je garde des poissons pour les vendre.\" Les directeurs du projet assurent qu'un soin particulier a été mis à garantir une irrigation durable ; l'eau est tirée de sources abondantes et des arbres sont plantés pour protéger les bassins versants. Depuis l'indépendance, on a tenté d'introduire plusieurs systèmes modernes d'irrigation. Dès 1982, l'entreprise Justino Lopes avait environ 8 ha irrigués par aspersion et par goutte-à-goutte. Trois systèmes différents ont ensuite été testés par le projet Tarrafal Water Resources. Mais la micro-irrigation n'a commencé à éveiller l'intérêt des paysans qu'après le lancement, en 1995, d'un projet FAO de diffusion de la petite irrigation mené avec l'appui de l'ancien Institut national pour le développement de l'agriculture et de l'élevage et un financement de la coopération américaine (USAID). L'objectif était de convaincre les paysans de la supériorité de la micro-irrigation sur le système traditionnel. Elle permet 40 à 50 % d'économies d'eau, avec des intervalles plus courts entre les arrosages, moins de stress hydrique et une augmentation significative de la productivité.Des kits d'irrigation ont tout d'abord été fournis dans le cadre du projet. L'État a pris le relais en subventionnant à 75 % les coûts d'installation, participation ramenée par la suite à 25 %. Aujourd'hui, les agriculteurs capverdiens n'ont plus droit à des subventions. Ils doivent acheter les équipements auprès des entreprises qui les commercialisent, en recourant au crédit bancaire. Ilídio da Moura, un agriculteur de Varzea de Santana (île de Santiago), souligne les difficultés de ce crédit : \"Il n'est pas aussi simple qu'il devrait l'être. Il faut aller en ville à la banque. Celle-ci nous demande des intérêts très élevés et se montre très exigeante sur le garant. De plus, elle demande les premiers remboursements trop rapidement. L'avantage avec l'irrigation, c'est que nous pouvons produire toute l'année, avec de bons rendements, et que nous arrivons toujours à écouler ce que nous produisons.\"L'adoption progressive du goutte-à-goutte à partir des années 1990 n'est pas seulement la plus importante \"révolution technologique\" de l'agriculture capverdienne. Elle a eu aussi des répercussions sociales considérables. Les agriculteurs cultivent de plus en plus pour le marché : de 5 000 t/an en 1991 à 18 000 t/an en 2000 (dernières statistiques) et probablement au-dessus de 25 000 t/an à présent. La qualité de l'alimentation de la population urbaine s'est du même coup améliorée. Les prix au consommateur restent toutefois élevés en raison de différents problèmes tout au long de la filière.Le jeune professeur Ângelo Freire, qui cultive une petite parcelle de 4 ares en irrigué pour son plaisir et pour compléter le revenu familial, estime que certains points de blocage nuisent à une adhésion plus large à la micro-irrigation. \"Le Service de vulgarisation a fait un bon travail de formation pour le choix d'un matériel durable, le savoir-faire technique et l'utilisation des équipements. Mais le modèle de gestion de l'eau qui caractérise les systèmes d'irrigation traditionnels est difficile à adapter à la nouvelle technologie. Le calendrier de la distribution d'eau, notamment, doit changer.\"Il reste également un énorme effort à faire pour construire plus de réservoirs où stocker l'eau et les placer, si possible, en hauteur par rapport aux parcelles à irriguer pour éviter l'utilisation de motopompes. Heureusement, le relief de l'archipel le permet souvent.On estime qu'un quart seulement des 1 800 ha de surface irriguée du Cap-Vert est aujourd'hui équipé en irrigation localisée. Beaucoup reste donc à faire, avec à la clé un énorme bénéfice pour les agriculteurs et les consommateurs.José Teixeira Le coût des catastrophes naturelles de ces dernières années, la nécessité d'accroître la compétitivité sur un marché libéralisé et l'amélioration des techniques de modélisation des risques ont eu pour effet d'éveiller l'intérêt pour une assurance en faveur des agriculteurs pauvres. Les assurances classiques ont leurs limites : des primes élevées, des difficultés logistiques à évaluer les demandes d'indemnisation dans les zones reculées et une clientèle peu familiarisée avec les services financiers. L'émergence de la microassurance est donc particulièrement intéressante pour les producteurs ACP. Il s'agit d'assurances au coût abordable pour les petits agriculteurs, proposées par des instituts de microfinance (IMF), des ONG ou des coopératives. Elles sont moins chères parce qu'elles concernent des groupes et sont associées à d'autres produits tels que crédit ou engrais. Dans des lieux reculés où les producteurs sont très dispersés, le regroupement des assureurs selon un mécanisme de pooling peut permettre de faire baisser les primes.En Inde, le secteur privé fournit déjà une micro-couverture pour les cultures et le bétail, la santé et les biens. Dans un projet pionnier, l'IMF locale BASIX s'est appuyée sur son réseau pour fournir la micro-assurance et a réassuré son portefeuille chez ICICI Lombard. Au Malawi l'ONG Opportunity International s'est associée à la Banque mondiale pour assurer les producteurs d'arachide contre le risque climatique.Dans le cadre du Programme des produits agricoles de base \"Tous ACP\" financé par l'UE (45 millions €), la FAO, le Groupe de travail de la Banque mondiale sur la gestion des risques liés à ces produits et d'autres organisations analysent la gestion du risque en agriculture. Le projet couvre l'Éthiopie, Madagascar, le Malawi, l'Ouganda et la Tanzanie.Selon Piero Conforti, économiste à la FAO, \"l'assurance agricole peut aider les petits agriculteurs à réduire les risques encourus et à améliorer leurs revenus, mais elle peut entraîner de gros frais de transaction. L'assurance à coupons est une façon de réduire ces frais\". Contrairement aux polices d'assurance classiques qui exigent des preuves des dégâts, les polices à coupons utilisent des critères météorologiques pour déclencher l'indemnisation -une température minimum, un volume de précipitations ou une certaine vitesse du vent. L'assuré reçoit un coupon d'une valeur monétaire fixe qui lui sera versée si l'événement climatique se produit.Cette assurance a l'avantage d'être simple, souple et de faible coût administratif, puisqu'il n'est nul besoin de vérifier les pertes. En Éthiopie, un projet développé avec le réassureur AXA Re fournit au Programme alimentaire mondial (PAM) une couverture pour le compte des cultivateurs de maïs. Si les précipitations sont inférieures à un niveau donné, le PAM reçoit une indemnisation qu'il convertit en aide. L'Earth Institute et le réassureur Swiss Re ont conçu une assurance à coupons basée sur les précipitations pour le village du millénaire Sauri, dans l'ouest du Kenya. La FAO travaille à mettre au point un système d'assurance à coupons pour les agriculteurs et les pêcheurs des Bahamas.Bien que considérée comme la formule la plus prometteuse, l'assurance à coupons a des inconvénients. Certains experts estiment que l'assurance n'est pas forcément le meilleur choix. D'autres mécanismes de gestion du risque sont importants, par exemple la diversification des produits ou la vaccination des troupeaux. Une formation est aussi cruciale car, pour de nombreux agriculteurs, l'assurance est un concept nouveau. Les gouvernements doivent instaurer un environnement favorable, y compris des mécanismes juridiques. Seuls l'Afrique du Sud, l'Inde et le Pérou disposent d'une législation explicite sur la micro-assurance.\"On peut faire beaucoup dans les pays ACP, mais des partenariats solides sont nécessaires. Ils doivent impliquer gouvernements, compagnies d'assurance privées, réassureurs, régulateurs et institutions de recherche\", explique Mark Wenner, expert financier à la Banque interaméricaine de développement. \"L'assurance est un produit compliqué à fournir de façon efficace et durable.\"La sécurité en prime L'assurance agricole aide à amortir les risques, mais les polices classiques sont souvent trop chères pour les petits agriculteurs. Divers mécanismes sont actuellement à l'étude pour faciliter leur accès à ce mode de gestion du risque.A s s u r a n c e Dynamiques paysannes nº 17 Téléchargeable gratuitement sur : www.sosfaim.be/pdf/fr/ dynamiquespaysannes/17_ organisations_interprofessionnelles_ agricoles_ouest_afrique.pdfDajaloo n° 10 www.sosfaim.be/pdf/fr/dajaloo/10_ crise_alimentaire.pdfLa FAO et l'Organisation mondiale de la santé (OMS) ont mis en ligne un nouveau guide, en anglais, sur l'élimination des emballages et récipients de pesticides vides. Celui-ci décrit les risques encourus et présente une série d'exemples de pays qui ont élaboré un plan pour gérer ces déchets dangereux. Des textes en anglais et en français dressent l'état de l'environnement non seulement globalement sur le continent, mais aussi par pays, accompagnés de graphiques, de cartes et de statistiques très parlants.L'édition imprimée est coûteuse en raison des nombreuses photos satellitaires, mais vous pouvez télécharger gratuitement en ligne cet extraordinaire atlas, chapitre par chapitre, de même que les images en haute ou basse résolution. La libéralisation de l'économie a eu un impact important sur les pays en développement producteurs de biens et de services. Associée à la tendance plus large de la mondialisation, cette évolution a créé de nouvelles opportunités, mais aussi de nouveaux défis pour les nombreux producteurs abandonnés à eux-mêmes. Ce marché de plus en plus concurrentiel est déconcertant pour les vendeurs qui doivent composer avec les contraintes supplémentaires de qualité, de rendement et des normes de sécurité.Ce guide aidera les lecteurs confrontés à certains problèmes pratiques en leur proposant des solutions pour les surmonter. C'est une bonne introduction générale aux lois de la concurrence et aux politiques de marché dans les pays en développement. Il explique certains pièges à éviter et les divers types de pratiques commerciales anticoncurrentielles qu'ils peuvent rencontrer. Il précise ensuite comment les politiques contribuent à garantir une concurrence équitable. Enfin, il illustre par des études de cas, notamment en Afrique du Sud et au Costa Rica, la manière dont la législation peut aider à réguler le marché.Le livre est téléchargeable en ligne et un cédérom reprenant l'essentiel des contenus du site est disponible pour ceux qui n'ont pas accès à Internet. Devenue synonyme de santé, la consommation de poissons, en particulier européenne, a partout encouragé la surpêche. Cette fringale qui pousse à pêcher plus que de raison condamne les écosystèmes océaniques de la planète à une mort certaine, à relativement brève échéance. Or la pêche est un métier de \"cueillette\" dans une immense réserve sauvage. Elle ne peut plus et ne doit plus être conçue de façon productiviste.Cet ouvrage critique sévèrement la politique européenne de la pêche. Après avoir décimé ses propres ressources halieutiques, le Vieux Continent s'est attaqué à celles des pays en développement. Les progrès de la technologie ont mis à la disposition des pêcheries industrielles de véritables armes de destruction massive qui ratissent les océans jusqu'à des profondeurs autrefois inaccessibles.L'auteur, qui a fait un tour du monde des pêcheries et connaît bien ce milieu, dresse un constat alarmant, rédigé d'une plume acérée, bien loin du langage lénifiant des grandes institutions.L'ouvrage se termine par un appel aux consommateurs européens, invités à préférer les rares espèces \"que l'on peut manger sans se poser trop de questions\" (cabillaud et saumon du Pacifique ou tilapia) à celles qui posent problème, telles que le thon rouge, le mérou et les requins, ou demandent réflexion (crevettes sauvages). Les personnes interrogées ont aussi insisté pour qu'il y ait davantage d'appui à des rencontres, notamment de formation, et au renforcement des capacités.Le CTA avait choisi une nouvelle formule pour cette vaste consultation : chacune des dix équipes était formée de deux agents du CTA, accompagnés d'un consultant indépendant et d'un consultant local. Ces équipes ont mené des entretiens individuels et en groupe auprès de quelque 200 organismes. L'exercice a permis de rencontrer certains bénéficiaires et de mieux cerner les besoins réels des groupes cibles.Les résultats des visites de terrain ont été corroborés par une enquête sur Internet auprès d'un échantillon d'utilisateurs et par les données recueillies par le personnel du CTA à l'aide d'outils de marketing (par exemple la matrice BCG) pour identifier les produits à fort potentiel de croissance. La combinaison de ces outils a mis en lumière certains des points forts du CTA : couverture de zones linguistiques différentes, évolution progressive vers les langues locales, large couverture thématique et expérience d'un certain nombre de médias.Les entretiens ont aussi abouti à des critiques constructives, allant de commentaires sur les réactions tardives aux demandes de services à des difficultés de communication avec le personnel. Il a été demandé que des agents du CTA fassent plus régulièrement des visites pour s'informer sur l'impact des produits et des services.Cet examen inédit a été une bonne occasion pour promouvoir le CTA, ses produits et ses services, tout en fournissant une importante base sur laquelle fonder des choix stratégiques pour l'avenir. Les résultats sont en train d'être analysés en vue de redéfinir les priorités de façon à utiliser au mieux les ressources limitées du CTA dans le 10 e Fonds européen de développement (FED).L'objectif est d'améliorer encore les services tout en élargissant leur portée et en augmentant leur impact sur l'agriculture et le développement rural des pays ACP.Rencontre avec des producteurs au Malawi Malheureusement, le monde rural n'est pas assez soutenu. Dans nos pays, il n'y a pas de politiques agricoles adaptées à la réalité. Elles existent sur le papier, mais sur le terrain on ne sent pas l'appui des pouvoirs publics, tant au niveau des petits producteurs que des gros. Dans le \"projet oignon\" mis en oeuvre par Agro-Niger, nous n'avons pas bénéficié d'aide directe. Comme l'investissement est lourd, nous avons cependant été exonérés de taxes sur les matériaux de construction et sur le matériel (tracteurs, irrigation…) importés et nous sommes exemptés pendant 5 ans de l'impôt sur les sociétés.C'est appréciable mais insuffisant. Le carburant, par exemple, n'est pas exonéré. Et il y a encore des taxes sur les semences… Tout cela veut dire que la politique agricole n'est pas au point : la base de la production, c'est l'énergie et les semences. Sans cela, nous ne pouvons pas être compétitifs parce que nous ne sommes pas au même diapason que les autres pays et que nos concurrents. Une intervention des pouvoirs publics est attendue à chaque étape, de la recherche au transport.En règle générale, nos pays sont assaillis de problèmes en tout genre. Les pouvoirs publics sont conscients que l'agriculture est importante, mais ne la considèrent pas comme prioritaire, comparée, par exemple, au paiement des salaires des fonctionnaires, qui peuvent descendre dans la rue pour manifester. Le monde rural, lui, n'est pas assez organisé pour revendiquer, pour réclamer des droits, donc il est laissé pour compte.Les ruraux sont aussi des électeurs, mais il faudrait qu'ils s'organisent, à travers des gens comme nous, pour convaincre les autorités du bien-fondé de l'agriculture. Par exemple, aujourd'hui, tout le monde parle de réduction de la pauvreté. Où peut-on commencer à réduire la pauvreté si ce n'est dans le monde agricole ? Si tous les producteurs sont bien organisés, ils peuvent produire mieux et participer au commerce international, ce qui fait entrer des devises dans le pays. Tout le monde en sort gagnant.Il est vrai qu'Agro-Niger est quand même bien vu des autorités, parce qu'à travers nos investissements le pays est reconnu et bénéficie d'une bonne image. Nous sommes un peu la vitrine pour les bailleurs de fonds ou les instances comme la Banque mondiale. Ce sont nos exploitations qu'on montre comme exemples de réussite à l'UE notamment. Mais les appuis ne suivent pas toujours.Grâce à nos activités, nous aidons des gens. Nous avons acheté des camions à certains pour transporter des oignons et ils remboursent en plusieurs années. Cela fait d'eux de petits entrepreneurs. D'autre part, partout où nous avons une installation, on voit la prospérité chez les paysans ou dans les villages autour de nos plantations. Les autorités coutumières ou locales nous en sont très reconnaissantes, parce qu'elles voient ce que l'entreprise apporte aux populations. Nous produisons selon trois modalités différentes. D'abord, sur nos propres plantations. Nous avons aussi acheté pas mal de terres et avons des conventions avec des paysans qui n'ont pas accès à la terre, notamment les femmes, qui viennent cultiver ces champs de 10 ou 20 ares. Nous apportons tout (semences, engrais, irrigation…). Ensuite, nous partageons la production : elles prennent un tiers et nous deux tiers. Ce système, testé depuis trois ans, marche bien. Nous devons refuser des gens parce que nous n'avons pas assez de terres.La troisième composante, ce sont les paysans qui ont leurs champs et que nous essayons d'encadrer pour qu'ils produisent mieux. Nous leur apportons une sorte d'assistance technique pour harmoniser et valoriser la production, sur la base d'un contrat.De cette manière, nous participons à la solidarité africaine, communautaire, mais en respectant aussi les exigences d'une bonne gestion de l'entreprise, qui repose d'abord sur le travail.Le secteur privé a un rôle capital à jouer dans le développement, y compris dans l'agriculture. il peut être le moteur de l'amélioration des conditions de vie, mais attend des pouvoirs publics un appui plus concret que de simples paroles valorisantes.Boureima Wankoye, homme d'affaires nigérien diplômé de l'École supérieure de commerce de Marseille (France), a choisi d'investir dans l'agriculture : la gomme arabique d'abord, l'oignon ensuite. Il dirige Agro-Niger, une entreprise qui produit, achète, transforme et vend dans toute la sous-région.","tokenCount":"7533"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1301521212.json b/data/part_2/1301521212.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e8fc1a735390d3cac6209bb54dc90538288cdfa --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1301521212.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ccbde39401f57b2c8fa363fe9399f2e7","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e28f5549-ec47-478b-9ebb-4ba3c1553bb0/retrieve","id":"1731467348"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"1cf28b1d-7e88-4cca-9f59-8f713f319895","pagecount":"1","content":"Future steps -Year 2 • Launch field activities as soon as travel restrictions imposed to manage COVID-19 are lifted• Finalize statistical analyses on seroprevalence data Activities initiated (2019) The project aims to generate knowledge and tools that can support better surveillance and control of the disease in Uganda. Figure 1 demonstrates the proposed impact pathway.ILRI thanks BMZ and all other donors and organizations which globally support its work through their contributions to the CGIAR Trust Fund.This • MAAIF, NaLIRRI, KEMRI and ILRI trained 22 entomologists from 6 districts on sampling and characterization of RVF mosquito vectors (Figure 4a). Most of those trained had wealth of expertise on tick and tsetse sampling, but not mosquitoes• VSF -Germany trained 36 veterinary field personnel from 12 districts on participatory disease surveillance. This will improve syndromic surveillance for RVF and other diseases such as PPR• MAAIF has compiled data on historical RVF outbreaks in the country, starting with the first outbreak that occurred in March 2016 (Figure 3a). • MAAIF and ILRI conducted spatial analysis of sero-epidemiological data that were collected just before the project commenced.• A draft a risk map generated is shown in Figure 3b.• KEMRI commenced RVF virus isolation from archived serum samples from patients suspected to have had RVF in previous outbreaks in Kenya.• Scan to find out more","tokenCount":"219"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1317338596.json b/data/part_2/1317338596.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad1465271d63dc82950ffed2857be53305dd31db --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1317338596.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"2ba4917342357d362c40f4b0641f1c1c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/713f35b8-3ddc-4e3b-91ab-9838d4409561/retrieve","id":"898855324"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"084acc55-b55a-4682-8528-ec25841d6c32","pagecount":"16","content":"An early warning system delivers rainfall data to Kenyan farmers' cell phones An SMS service delivers quick answers to farmers' climate questions Communities use GIS and GPS to assess climate risks in the Cook IslandsF armers in ACP countries face increasingly unpredictable weather conditions, where late rains wash away newly planted seedlings or crops are scorched in dry soil before they are ready for harvesting. To help them cope with the erratic conditions, farmers are using ICTs to stay informed with regularly updated weather forecasts to help them plan their seasonal activities, and ensure timely delivery to markets. They are also using technology to share their expertise with other producers around the world to help them deal with extreme and variable weather conditions.In the Cook Islands, a local NGO, Te Rito Enua, worked with four rural communities to identify potential threats from the changing climate. Teams from the communities used GPS devices to record the locations of houses, farmland, water sources and other important landmarks. The project team entered the data into a geographic information system (GIS), combined with information from the government and other sources, to develop detailed maps of the resources available to the communities.Through this participatory mapping project, the communities were able to see which areas of their land would be vulnerable to prolonged periods of unseasonal rain or drought. With a better picture of the possible dangers, the community set up committees to develop strategies to deal with the increasingly unpredictable weather and protect their most valuable resources.Meanwhile, a team of scientists from the University of Oklahoma is trying to improve the reliability of weather information. They have developed a system to collate rainfall data in West Africa, using GIS to plot the precise locations of the rain gauge stations. The team tested the system, known as Rainwatch, in Niger, which has had wildly fluctuating rainfall patterns in the last few years.Staff from the local meteorological service can use Rainwatch to analyse the data, and produce maps and graphs that are easy to interpret. The service can share these visual representations with researchers and government ministries, and pass them on to radio and television stations, who can broadcast the information rapidly to even very remote communities. Previously, it could take up to two weeks to make rainfall information available to the public. Meteorological services can also use the system to monitor rainfall patterns, and set up early warning mechanisms when specific areas experience very wet or dry spells.It is especially important that farmers get information on imminent threats if they are to plan their activities effectively and get the best from their crops. For many generations, the Nganyi community, from the Kisumu region of Kenya, have used traditional methods to predict the weather and prepare for the planting and harvesting seasons. In recent years, however, they have found that their forecasts are less reliable due to increasingly erratic weather patterns.In a pilot project with the IGAD Climate Prediction and Applications Centre (ICPAC), the community is now working with the Kenya Meteorological Department to share information and collaborate their efforts to predict the weather for the coming seasons. The project collates the information into a database and transmits it directly to the farmers' cell phones, giving them advance weather details to help them get the most out of their crops.And in Zambia, the National Agricultural Information Services has refined its question-and-answer service to help farmers prepare for unseasonal weather. They have now made it easier, and faster, for their experts to deliver details via SMS to farmers, showing that even the information services have to be prepared to adapt to climate change. ◀ An atmosphere for change ICT Update issue 63, December 2011.ICT Update is a bimonthly printed bulletin with an accompanying web magazine (http://ictupdate.cta.int) and e-mail newsletter. The next issue will be available in February 2012.T here are two ways we can address climate change. One is through mitigation efforts that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and decrease the great amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The other approach, adaptation, recognises the risks and the fact that the climate will continue to change. Adaptation means adjusting to existing or expected impacts. Both actions are equally important and challenging. They require a significant amount of attention, direct response, policies, plans and implementation strategies, across all levels of society.Adaptation and mitigation actions are possible at the local level too. For instance, using renewable energy sources or planting trees to expand forests is a mitigation action, while an adaptation action may involve sharing information so that local communities can better respond and adjust to climate change. That information, however, needs to be relevant and up to date if communities are to make effective changes.The Global Connectivity team at the International Institute for Sustainable example, they receive regular weather updates from the country's meteorological department which they can share with the farmers. The CKW can interpret the information to suit the local environment and send data back to the relevant content providers to help them develop their services.Local communities are continuously exploring new and innovative ways of adapting to climate change, and more needs to be done to make it easier for them to share their experiences with others. Communities also require additional support and partnerships with the private sector, provincial or national government and other agencies to deploy new technologies and enhance existing ones used for adaptation. Further research may be required in this area, and strategies that link research outcomes to policies should be explored.Farmers are very aware of climate change and the effects it can have on their livelihoods. They see that productivity has changed in recent years and know that a number of factors have caused this change, including increased rainfall and unpredictable weather patterns in their region.Many ACP farmers have already had to adapt to their environment. They currently work in extreme conditions, and have developed ways to grow crops in very dry or very wet land. And researchers are now also realising how this indigenous knowledge can help to enhance scientific knowledge. They are looking at ways in which these farmers can share their methods with others around the world, with people who are now facing similar situations.Technology will be very useful for gathering and disseminating this information quickly, and to a wider audience. Such initiatives can help the global community understand the helpful adaptations that ACP farmers have already made, and can provide the means of sharing information that will help all producers deal with future challenges. ◀ Ben Akoh (bakoh@iisd.ca) is a project manager at the International Institute for Sustainable Development (www.iisd.org) Development (IISD) researches the use of ICTs in the production of greener economies, environments, and societies. The team is currently participating in the eTransform Africa project and analysing how ICTs are used to support adaptation action at the community level. The project has brought together a consortium of researchers to explore how a variety of sectors, including agriculture, health, education and others, can use ICTs to address the major economic, environmental and social challenges facing the African continent.IISD is also gathering case studies showing how ICTs help communities adapt to the effects of climate change. It has observed that people already use a number of platforms to share information, either online or through other means. AfricaAdapt, for example, is a continental initiative for sharing adaptation information between researchers, policy makers, civil society organisations and communities.Community radio is another effective method of disseminating information, since it overcomes illiteracy problems and the information can be translated into local languages. Some groups have even developed ways to use radio to get feedback from the communities, to find out how they were adapting to climate change and to assess how targeted messages were being received and used.A project in South Africa, for example, uses sensors in the Crocodile River that transmit temperature and water quality data via the cell phone network to a remote location. There, they are analysed so action can be taken that affect the dam downstream. New, more efficient and intelligent sensor networks are being tested around Lake Malawi that generate better quality data and perform initial on-the-spot analyses before transmitting the information, resulting in a reduction of the time needed to make decisions.In Uganda, community knowledge workers (CKWs) from the Grameen Foundation use applications installed on smartphones that receive regularly updated information. Users can pass this information on to farmers and also upload data from the field. ForCommunity groups are making use of websites, radio and cell phones to share information on climate change adaptation.eTransform Africa ➜ www.etransformafrica.org AfricaAdapt ➜ www.africa-adapt.net E xtreme weather events, such as tropical cyclones, long periods of drought, sea level rise and higher temperatures, lead to loss of soil fertility and land degradation, reducing food security in farming communities. The Cook Islands, like many small islands, are highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and sea level rise. They comprise small land masses surrounded by ocean, and are located in a region prone to natural disasters.With limited long-term meteorological data available, it is difficult to make accurate predictions on how climate change will affect the Cook Islands. However, there is consensus that the region is likely to experience more frequent extreme weather events, including floods, droughts, periods of extreme heat, an increase in cyclone intensity, increased climate variability and rise in sea levels.Observations by Pacific Island communities indicate that predicted climate change effects are being experienced, and are causing considerable social, economic and environmental pressures. The ability of the communities to adapt to a changing climate is generally low, due to lack of information and awareness of the potential effects of changing weather patterns. Traditional natural resource management practices, however, still practiced in some parts of the Cook Islands, provide important tools for resilience in the face of environmental change.In response to growing concerns about the possible effects of changing weather patterns, a local NGO, Te Rito Enua (TRE), tested the use of participatory GIS to assess climate vulnerability and adaptation planning in the Cook Islands. Together with the country's government and with the support of the Asian Development Bank, TRE worked with four communities on the islands of Rarotonga and Aitutaki.Both islands face similar problems of water shortages, deforestation and soil erosion as a result of climate change. Their terrain, however, is quite different. Rarotonga, the most populous island in the country, is mountainous, steep and heavily forested. Aitutaki is mainly atoll and lagoon, and so is flatter with some steeper land on the remains of the submerged volcano around which the atoll formed.The project began in 2010, and lasted 10 months. In that time, TER worked with the communities to develop the practical tools and skills necessary to produce their own specific climate risk analysis. The organisation gave training courses in participatory mapping, with components in vulnerability and risk assessment, climate models, GPS and GIS, and map interpretation.Participants, mostly volunteers, came from a cross-section of the community demography, ranging from school-aged youth to elders, including community leaders, resource users and professional resource managers. As a result of the training, all participants had a basic knowledge of the methods to be employed in the project, which they used to collect data from the field, and record assets that could be included later on maps.This data, which participants within their own frame of reference, helped them identify issues that could affect the vulnerability of individual households and their wider community. They looked at facilities such as energy provision, water supply, sanitation services, port facilities and even civil defence.Important risks associated with climate change were identified through the assessment and mapping processes that were neither considered nor evident during national-level vulnerability assessments. One example is the waste management facilities situated near the pilot communities. Runoff from these landfill sites at times of heavy rain can adversely affect the adjoining aquatic ecosystems. The communities rely heavily on these vulnerable coastal resources for their livelihoods, and so future waste management solutions need to include these considerations at the early planning stages.Additionally, the mapping information showed that disaster response shelters are often placed in areas vulnerable to sea-level rise and storm surge inundation. Also, some households could experience a shortage of water as the climate changes, which will mean enhanced water conservation measures, such as developing programmes for improved rainwater harvesting. Rarotonga in particular is dependent upon surface water supplies for domestic consumption and has suffered periodic water shortages in recent years as sources have dried up.A local NGo tested an innovative participatory mapping approach to help communities in the Cook Islands assess climate risks. the resulting maps highlighted vulnerable areas, allowing the communities to develop strategies to adapt to climate change.John Waugh (waugh2k@gmail.com) is an independent consultant on environmental strategies and planning, and science adviser to Te Rito Enua. Mona Matepi (tarofeet@gmail.com) is the executive director of Te Rito Enua. George de Romilly (romillyg@istar.ca) is an expert on climate policy and programme development and is a policy and legal adviser to Te Rito Enua.Another significant factor revealed by the project was the extent of invasive plant species in the environment. Observers had noticed that the watersheds of both Rarotonga and Aitutaki were infested with Cardiospermum grandiflorum (balloon vine), Merremia peltata (kurima), and Mikania micrantha (mile-a-minute weed).Available evidence shows that the species are having a devastating impact on the native vegetation and natural watershed systems. The implications for water supply in this already waterstressed country are not clear, but are a cause for concern.After the data collection phase, the project team integrated the information into existing government GIS files to highlight areas where a changing climate could potentially affect the environment. The resulting map layers were combined with information from a climate model commonly used for planning in the region. The new data were shared with the government to be integrated into their GIS database and made accessible to the National Environment Service, and relevant ministries.Each community received a paper map, known as a 'vulnerability atlas', showing the information specific to their area. The project team also facilitated meetings to discuss the implications of the mapping and the surveying process, and to gauge community perceptions of climate change. These discussions identified the main risks and developed plans for priority actions. Each community set up a Climate Change and Disaster Committee to ensure the plans would be followed.In some instances, the communities identified traditional practices, including organic farming and resource management methods, as having considerable value as adaptation measures to reduce the greatest climate change risks. One example was the traditional ra'ui system of resource allocation, which two communities identified as a way to improve the resilience of vulnerable water resources. Communities in Aitutaki also suggested promoting traditional building practices and styles, which could help mitigate the effects of the anticipated increase in extreme heat events. Some community participants were initially sceptical about the project, because they felt that the government had already mapped everything that was important. However, once they were able to re-envision maps, and given access to mapping tools, the communities became enthusiastic. As one of the senior participants of the Aitutaki planning process observed, 'I've lived on the island most of my life, and have today seen things I've never noticed before. 'Being able to participate in the production of maps that were explicitly for and about them gradually led to discussions on their social and physical environment that went well beyond the more obvious dimensions of climate change and climate adaptation. The discussions touched on deeper social issues such as cultural erosion, loss of language, unsustainable resource use, invasive species and out-migration.Planning for climate adaptation became a way of framing the broader suite of development issues. Because of this, the communities were able to take te rIto eNuAThe project made use of existing geographic information available from the government and combined it with the local knowledge captured by the community members.ownership of mapping their environment and the assets within it that are important to their identity and survival.The project showed that a community-based participatory approach is a valuable tool for bringing the reality of climate change to bear at the local and household level. A process of discussing, debating, and problem solving produces more resilient communities that are more able to organise themselves and prepare for a changing climate.Not only does participatory mapping provide communities with tangible evidence of the risks associated with climate change, but the community mapping process also highlights behavioural and development issues that affect the vulnerability of individual households and the community at large.There was a discernable sense of empowerment by participating communities in developing vulnerability maps and having them available. Without exception, all the pilot communities requested printed copies of the vulnerability atlases for display in public places to engender support for change and implementation of their proposed action plans.Measures to build upon this project would include using the existing capacity as an emerging centre of excellence. The centre's prime role would be to educate trainers to improve the ability of community mapping practitioners to convey techniques and best practices to other communities.To overcome the bottleneck in trained personnel, and the high costs of using commercial products, the training of young and motivated community members in open source GIS products, such as Q-GIS, will make the adoption of this technology for community mapping possible. A regional facility to build capacity for community mapping and access to remote sensing analysis will go far towards helping Pacific island communities to adapt to climate change.The project found that the participatory processes generated local knowledge unavailable to high-level planners. The process also generated a strong sense of ownership of the outcomes by communities, and increased the knowledge and awareness of participants about climate change risks and the implications for their families and communities. Finally, it increased the skills needed to develop more communities that are more resilient.This approach allows adaptation strategies to be developed from the bottom-up -from the family through to the community, island and eventually the national level -at the same time as the national strategy is developed from the top down.It should be noted, of course, that a community-based approach is no substitute for a technically rigorous national approach to climate change. Some important technical issues lie outside the competency of communities, and the scale can be too great; a patchwork of community approaches could potentially result in the geographic division of responsibilities that require a more unified approach. For example, ecosystem-based approaches require interventions at ecosystem scales.However, it is also clear that the communities are not fully engaged on the realities of climate change. This is clearly an issue of environmental awareness and ownership. Climate change issues have so far been the 'government's role' in the eyes of many communities, largely due to government officials being the ones engaged in the climate debate and conducting climate change vulnerability and adaptation activities.Linking the national efforts to local communities, therefore, is best demonstrated through the communitybased approach of site-specific adaptation planning. Adaptation thus becomes everyone's business. ◀ te rIto eNuA • Discourage building in vulnerable areas.• Establish a community-partnering programme to provide safe shelter for those in the most vulnerable homes. • Amend building code and encourage new construction to higher standards. • Establish community micro-finance or insurance to assist homeowners affected by extreme weather, and develop a reinsurance scheme for vulnerable businesses. • Raise public awareness of the need to build resilient homes. • Establish natural defences along the coast including through ecological restoration. • Establish community cleanup work details (tutaka) to control areas of stagnant water.P eriodic floods and droughts have already had a major socio-economic impact in Kenya, and led to reduced economic growth in recent years. The extreme weather from 1998 to 2000 was estimated to have cost US$ 2.8 billion from the loss of crops and livestock, forest fires, damage to fisheries, and reduction in hydropower generation, industrial production and water supply. Droughts in 2004, 2005 and 2009 affected millions of people and resulted in major economic costs from restrictions on water and energy, while the current drought in the Horn of Africa is said to be the worst in 60 years.There are also health concerns as changing weather patterns cause the incidence of pests and diseases to rise in some areas. Recent studies, for example, show that people living in rural parts of Kisumu region will have a far greater risk of contracting malaria by 2050 than they have now. There is, therefore, a need for an effective early warning system responsive to the needs of rural communities.The IGAD Climate Prediction and Applications Centre (ICPAC), a climate research institute representing seven east African countries, is working on a system using cell phones to help farmers deal with the negative impacts of climate change. They are initially working with farmers from the Nganyi community around Kisumu as they had previously worked with ICPAC. The Nganyi are known for their own elaborate techniques for predicting the weather, based on knowledge and techniques passed on from generation to generation. The farmers have suffered in the last few years, as these traditional forecasting methods have proven less reliable in the face of increasingly erratic weather patterns.There are still many other sources of climate and weather data, such as brochures, community meetings, radio and television programmes. However, the community felt that the information often came too late to be useful, indicating that perhaps these more conventional modes of dissemination were not adequate. Also, many of the farmers were unfamiliar with the terms used in modern meteorological updates and were unable to interpret the technical language in a way that applied to their own lives.Cell phones, however, have become invaluable for the Nganyi. Initial project research showed that 88% of respondents in the community owned a cell phone, most of whom used it daily, while another 11% had access to one through a family member or neighbour. A method of delivering information via cell phones could, therefore, be useful for reaching a large portion of the population.The new system makes use of the Nganyi's traditional forecasting techniques combined with data from the Kenya Meteorological Department (KMD). The community's forecasters, known as rainmakers, meet with the members of the KMD every six months, before the onset of the twice-yearly periods of heavy rainfall, to discuss their respective findings. KMD staff compile the resulting information and enter it into a database. The information is then processed and Forecasts for a fairer future packaged into a format suitable for sending as an SMS message, which is sent using an SMS gateway, a computer program for sending multiple SMSes from a single computer. This program broadcasts the messages through the cell phone network to the Nganyi farmers who have their numbers registered on the cell phone database. The information is delivered quickly, is relevant to the specific area and is written in the local languages of Kiswahili and Luhya.The messages contain details such as rainfall intensity and length of dry spells between rainfalls, if any are within the forecast range. This type of information helps farmers decide which crop to plant and when, and estimate the best time for weeding and harvesting. Extension officers visit the community to give practical advice, where necessary, on the various tasks.The system, therefore, gives the farmers an early warning, allowing them to prepare food reserves for the period during and after extreme weather conditions. This reduces their dependence on government resources for food and shelter when drought or floods affect the country. Timely weather information can also help the farmers manage their crops efficiently, which can lead to improved output and increased income.The farmers have to pay to be part of the scheme, a cost that is prohibitive to many, according to project research. The system currently delivers the information to just 40 farmers. The project will require external funding to reach more producers, at least for the first two years until it becomes financially self-sustaining.An assessment of the project showed that there is a great demand among the farmers to break out of the cycle of poverty. They felt they could achieve this if they had increased access to competitive markets and more power to negotiate better prices for their produce. The information from the ICPAC project could help the farmers realise this as it could improve the productivity and quality of their crops. ◀A system delivering weather details via SMS to farmers in Kenya makes use of traditional and modern forecasting methods, alerting them to periods of heavy rain or drought.Sharon Wanjiru Kamau (kamau_sharon@yahoo.com) is an MSc computer science student at the University of Nairobi (www.uonbi.ac.ke)Weather information from other sources often comes too late or in a form that is difficult for the farmers to understand.FINbArr o'reIlly / reuterS Aondover Tarhule (atarhule@ou.edu) is chair of the Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability at the University of Oklahoma (http://geography.ou.edu). Zakari Saley-Bana is a former graduate student of the Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, the University of Oklahoma. Peter J. Lamb (plamb@ou.edu) is director of the Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies at OU (www.cimms.ou.edu).S ub-Saharan Africa is highly dependent on rainfall. More than 90% of the land is used for farming, very little of which is irrigated. Despite this reliance on rainfall, there are relatively few monitoring stations in the region that gather the data that farmers need to plan their seasonal cultivation processes. Even in areas where rainfall data are collected, several weeks can pass before the information is processed and made available in a form that is useful to farmers.To speed up and simplify the data collection and management procedures, a team of researchers from the University of Oklahoma has developed a geographic information system (GIS) that monitors rainfall and its seasonal patterns. Known as Rainwatch, the system can also automatically generate visual representations of the data that can be easily interpreted by interested parties, including farmers.The team has initially tested Rainwatch in Niger, where the Direction de la Météorologie Nationale du Niger (DMNN) is responsible for monitoring weather and climate. The country suffered a severe drought in 2009, followed by its wettest year in a generation in 2010, and then a return to severe rainfall deficiencies in 2011. Although there are more than 200Climate researchers have developed a system that uses GIS, computers, and the internet to improve rainfall data management and information delivery to farmers in West Africa.stations in Niger's rainfall monitoring network, most are 'rain gauge only' sites maintained by volunteer observers. They report rainfall data to DMNN's operations office in Niamey once a day by telephone or radio. Only 14 stations transmit data on an hourly basis throughout the year, using telex and phone.From these data, DMNN compiles rainfall reports that are broadcast on national and local radio and on national television -although TV reception is limited to the major urban areas. DMNN also publishes regular bulletins for the country's eight provinces, and shares data with policy makers and the national committee for early warning and disaster management systems (Comité Nationale du Systeme d'Alerte Précoce et de Gestion des Catastrophes).Although rainfall levels are broadcast on radio daily, it can take upto two weeks before DMNN releases data that have undergone any kind of analysis. Users of rainfall data outside the research community are not interested in exact rainfall statistics. Most farmers and other groups who depend on rainfall prefer qualitative information relating to previous seasonal patterns. Farmers, for example, simply want to know if the weather is dry, wet, or normal for the time of year. A long delay in delivering processed data means they cannot rely on the information, and cannot plan ahead.Rainwatch was developed to alleviate such limitations, and improve the way rainfall data is collected, managed and disseminated throughout West Africa. The system consists of a database and a program that customises several functions of ArcGIS and MapObjects software. The database is linked to a graphics feature, which automatically updates the related charts and graphs as new data are added. The software adaptations make it easy for the user to process and view the data, and prepare it for publication and distribution.When users log on to Rainwatch, they see a map showing the geographic locations of rainfall monitoring stations throughout the country. Users can click on the relevant icon to view the rainfall data for a particular station, then choose to compare the figures for a particular period of time against the median or with other years or even with the results from other stations. The user can then use the program to produce a variety of graphics to illustrate the data.The number of sites and/or years that can be seen simultaneously is limited only by the amount of information on the database. Users can also request further analyses of the data to show the frequency and intensity of rainfall in certain areas, or view the occurrence of dry spells; information that is especially useful to farmers.The results are, of course, only as good as the data. Rainwatch works best and provides the most accurate analyses when an optimum number of observers regularly contribute data to the system. By simplifying the data management processes, Rainwatch could be the catalyst needed for many countries to improve their rainfall monitoring procedures. The researchers hope the system will be adopted more widely throughout West Africa where other more complicated rainfall data dissemination systems have had limited success.Rainwatch uses self-explanatory symbols and easy-to-understand terminology. When the system was tested, new users quickly became comfortable and could navigate their way through its processes within ten minutes. The test users also found it easy to follow the system's logic, and fully understand and interpret the graphics they produced.Based on feedback from users so far, the research team is developing an updated version of the program. Users suggested including a feature that would trigger an early warning system once rainfall, or lack of it, reached a certain threshold. Users also wanted to be able to export data to spreadsheets easily for further analysis. The upgraded Rainwatch will also include other climatic variables, such as temperature, streamflow, and soil moisture -which are linked to activities like irrigation scheduling.Another important change will be to make Rainwatch compatible with free GIS software. This will make it available to users who cannot afford the product licence for the ArcGIS program, something that has been required up to now. A lower cost version of the system would make it possible to train more observers and equip observation stations throughout the region, which could act as local weather information centres. Providing more localised services could lead to farmers having a greater awareness of rainfall data, and a higher likelihood of being able to use the information. With all these improvements, the researchers hope that Rainwatch will become the African counterpart to Australia's Rainman rainfall monitoring software.There are already plans to expand the use of Rainwatch beyond Niger. Starting in 2010, the long-term plan is to develop it into a web-based application that would be available to anyone with internet access. It could then be used alongside other climate information initiatives, using radio or cell phones, for example, to deliver weather details to people in rural communities.The researchers believe that Rainwatch can especially benefit national meteorological services by improving the automation of rainfall data collection and database management. The ability to produce easily interpreted charts and graphics increases the likelihood that the information is distributed to more people. These are critical features in reducing the time lag between collecting the data and delivering it to farmers, and providing it in a format to help them adapt to a changing climate. ◀ DIDIer berGouNhoux / PhotoNoNStoP /ANP Rainwatch's easy-todevelop charts and graphs make rainfall data analysis simple. extension worker, and then discuss the issues raised in the broadcast. If they still have questions, they can fill in an evaluation form and send it to the nearest NAIS district office. The district office passes the form to the provincial office, where it is finally sent to the main country office. There, a NAIS radio producer assesses the questions, and contacts relevant specialists in agricultural research institutes and government ministries. Based on their feedback, the producer prepares a response for broadcast in a subsequent radio programme.The whole process can take up to two months. The farmers who asked the question have to wait all that time before they get an answer. In an effort to speed up the process, the department started to look at alternative methods of delivering the information. 'We looked at the technology currently available, and saw an opportunity to give farmers the information they needed in a shorter time, ' said Kahilu, a radio programme producer with the NAIS.Together with the International Institute for Communication and Development, and a local software developer, NAIS developed a system, called SMSize to which farmers can send a question via an SMS from a cell phone. The question arrives directly at a server computer at the central office, where the producer researches the answer and sends back the information to the phone of the querying farmer, in the same language as the original request.'Instead of taking several weeks, the farmers now get the information within a day or two, ' said Kahilu. 'We also still use the questions and concerns raised by the farmers to develop material for the radio programmes which will help other farmers facing similar problems. 'Delivering the information to cell phones helps the people living in areas where even radio reception is poor. Cell phones are now so popular that there will be at least one person in every community who owns a phone. Even ifFarmers in Zambia with climate change questions can now receive quick answers via SMS from a new system developed by the country's National Agricultural Information Services.I n recent years, the Zambia National Agricultural Information Services (NAIS) has been receiving an increasing number of questions from farmers concerned about unpredictable weather patterns. Farmers are pointing out that sometimes the rains come earlier than usual, and when they do come, they are so heavy that they ruin the work the farmer has done to prepare the land. Sometimes the opposite is the problem and there is too little rain to water the crops.'The standard advice we gave in past is no longer relevant, ' says Darlington Kahilu, an agricultural information officer with NAIS. 'For example, we used to tell farmers to plant their maize seeds as soon as the first rains came. The rains would usually continue for a few weeks and germinate the seeds. But now there could be a dry spell lasting a month or more, killing the new seedlings. The farmers then have to spend precious time and money replanting. ' NAIS uses a mixture of print and electronic media to provide agricultural information. Radio is especially useful, and many farmers listen to programmes in groups, often with an Darlington Kahilu (dakahilu@yahoo.co.uk) is an agricultural information officer and programme producer with the National Agricultural Information Services in Zambia the network does not cover that particular village, as soon as someone is in an area with reception, they can send an SMS question and receive an answer that they can then share with the rest of the community.The farmers pay the cost of sending an SMS to the system, which is currently slightly more expensive than the normal cost of sending an SMS. However, since a single SMS can only carry 160 text characters, the farmer has to pay for two or three SMSes if the question is longer. The information officers also have the challenge of keeping their replies as short as possible, which can be difficult if a more detailed explanation is necessary. The cost of the replies is covered by the department, and NAIS is looking at ways of reducing the cost of sending requests to the system.NAIS tested SMSize in the northern province of Kasama, and is currently working to expand the project to cover the whole of Zambia. 'We have already started informing farmers around the country, and alerted the provincial offices, to make them aware of the system and how it works, ' said Kahilu.NAIS was especially encouraged by the feedback from the Kasama farmers. 'They told us that they now get a better service delivered in a shorter time, ' said Kahilu. 'One tomato farmer, Mr Kennedy Kanyanta of Ngoli, pointed out that his crop is especially vulnerable to sudden weather changes. The tomatoes could be destroyed if he had to wait for a month to get the right advice. Now he has the information within days, and can take the appropriate action in time to save the crop. ' ◀The information sent to farmers on the SMSize system is also broadcast on the regular agricultural radio programmes.'The standard advice we gave in past is no longer relevant.' Darlington Kahilu, agricultural information officer with NAIS.Evidence from the field is paramount when it comes to understanding the effect climate change has on the biosphere. While the causes and consequences of that change can be hard to grasp, hard facts from the field can help us to understand where and what is affected, and how.To promote the availability of climate data and encourage its analysis, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) a US-based environmental advocacy group, developed the Climate Hot Map, a web-atlas showing climate 'hot spots' .Each hot spot describes a location where higher than average regional temperatures have a negative impact on human activities and the environment. (Persistently higher regional temperatures are an indicator of climate change.)On the Climate Hot Map website, users can select any hot spot to get key facts on how climate change is affecting these places. They can also read about possible mitigation and adaptation measures.Visit the Climate Hot Map at www. climatehotmap.org.The main page opens to show a map of the world with the climate hot spots colour-coded to indicate five categories of environmental features that are affected by a warmer climate: people, freshwater, oceans, ecosystems and temperature.Under each category, listed below the map, users can check a series of boxes to select which aspects they want the map to display. Checking the 'food' box in the people category, for example, will show places on the map where food supply will be affected by a changing climate.You can click on the hot spot placemark on the map to get more details, including an image, a brief description of the location, and details about the three most severe impacts affecting that area. For example, the map displays several locations when the 'food' box is checked, including one in the Western Highveld in South Africa. The text tells us that 'Unless we act now to curb heat-trapping emissions, corn production in the Western Highveld is expected to decline, destabilizing the food supply of millions of people' .The text box provides only a brief summary of the information available, but also includes links with details about how to take action, learn about potential regional solutions to the global warming problem, or access the whole factsheet of the hot spot complete with key facts, details and endnotes.The hot spot information can also be downloaded and explored in Google Earth. Click on the Google link at bottom left corner of the map to download the KML file. Locate the downloaded file on your computer and double click to o view the information in Google Earth. From the program you can drag the KML file from the 'Temporary Places' folder in the frame on the left, and drop it in the 'Places' folder to store the file permanently on your computer.The information on each hot spot is also available from the Climate Hot Map main page, by clicking on the four tabs above the interactive map. The first tab from the left is a list of all the hot spots organised into regional groups. Click on a region listed on the left to show the associated hot spots. Click on one to open its complete factsheet.The second tab is the map itself where you can choose the hot spots by geographical location or type of impacts.The third tab 'See Impacts' gives an overview of the five main impact categories: people, freshwater, oceans, ecosystems and temperatures. Clicking any of the impacts refreshes the page to show the associated information and a link to references. The 'food' section, for example, reveals information on how climate change can reduce agriculturalGeorGe MollerING/NeDerlANDSe FreelANCerS/ANP productivity, lead to increased irrigation and threats from pests, and warns of severe shifts in seasonal rainfall patterns.The site provides further information on the causes of climate change, and has a glossary of climate change terms, both of which can be accessed by clicking the relevant links at the top of any page on the site.The 'Find Solutions' tab gives more details on the mitigation and adaptation measures needed to tackle climate change.The Solutions page is organised into world regions, and gives information on each region, such as what is being done to reduce the effects of climate change. Each regional page provides links to websites of institutions and programmes dedicated to the issue.The Climate Hot Map is one of several tools related to climate change awareness. The Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security research programme has its own map of climate hot spots (http://goo.gl/KAyDw) -along with a tools, a data portal (http:// goo.gl/uu6KC)and a 'related reading' page (http://goo.gl/7Qo7E).For more details on climate compatible development tools, the Climate Planning website provides an interactive user guide on how to develop sound climate strategies (http://goo.gl/65W1q). ◀Agriculture in many developing countries, where productivity is already low, will be greatly affected by a changing climate. Farmers will have to adapt if they are going to maintain an income and food security for their families and communities. This paper, published by the International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, looks at a number of technologies that can be used to provide farmers with the information they will need to overcome the main challenges of climate change. The authors, Travis Lybbert and Daniel Sumner, also look at the key research institutes and organisations and consider their role in supporting agriculture in developing countries. ➜ The indications are that very few farmers anywhere on the globe will be unaffected by climate change, but there are likely to be winners as well as losers. The latest predictions for Africa from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, for example, show an average temperature increase of more than 3°C by the end of this century across the continent, while rainfall is predicted to increase by 7% in east Africa but decrease by 4% in southern Africa. On top of this, farmers will have to deal with more extreme weather events, like floods and cyclones. Sea level rise adds to the pressure in coastal zones, a key issue for many small island states.Coping with these changes will be a tall order for industrialised farmers with access to capital, insurance, modern technology and the latest scientific advice. For subsistence farmers operating on the margins, it will be an even greater challenge.➜ Communication is going to be critical in helping farmers win this battle, and it is a real advantage that cell phones are now reaching most rural communities in ACP countries. And access to the internet via smartphones is now on the horizon too. This provides communication options that were unthinkable a few years ago. It is not unrealistic to think that farmers, even in remote areas, will have access to modern online communication channels within the next decade or two.The technology, however, is only half the problem. Having reliable, relevant and appropriately tailored information to pass through those channels is also essential. Right now, the web is awash with climate data, research reports, contradictory statements, and a fair amount of deliberate misinformation. Even trained researchers can have difficulty getting to grips with it; for a farmer looking for practical information they can trust, it is even tougher.There are also problems with terminology and translation of key terms into indigenous languages. There is a big job to be done getting the basic concepts across, so farmers have the information they need to respond.Can ICTs be used to help farmers access accurate weather forecasts? ➜ For short-term weather forecasting, SMS services are already available in some countries, and as cell phone use picks up these are likely to spread. SMS is also being used in creative ways as part of cyclone and flood alert systems, helping farmers to get their families and livestock to safety.Longer-term weather forecasting is trickier. Having reliable forecasts for three to six months ahead would transform the picture for farmers. It would make a huge difference in helping them decide what crops to plant, whether a lower-yielding drought-resistant variety would be a better bet than a higher-yielding standard variety, for example. Cell phones would be one of the ideal ways of delivering this information. Unfortunately, the ability to provide this kind of seasonal forecast is some way off.➜ Too often, the answer is that it doesn't. Whether it is climate data or information on new cropping patterns, there is still a massive communication gap in many cases between researchers and the ultimate beneficiaries, farmers. The good news is that many research institutions (and, importantly, their funders) are waking up to this and putting more emphasis on communication.Individual research institutions can only do so much, however, and I am a particular advocate of the role that intermediary organisations can play in bringing together research from different sources, summarising and repackaging it into formats that are more understandable for policy makers, extension workers, farmers and other users, and getting it to them through the appropriate channels.How can online information services collaborate more effectively? ➜ In the climate sector, there are now many excellent websites out there, but this creates problems of its own -one that has been dubbed 'portal proliferation syndrome' . With so many websites, it is hard to know where to start, and a new one seems to pop up each week. Duplication of effort is undoubtedly happening, and users are left scratching their heads.To tackle this, a workshop was held recently in Germany for a range of people working on the subject of climate change. Staff from 21 leading global and regional climate websites got together to discuss how they could collaborate more effectively. A host of ideas emerged, including content sharing arrangements, a joint search facility, and a 'portal of portals' to guide users to the most relevant site. ◀'There is still a massive communication gap between researchers and the ultimate beneficiaries, farmers. ' Geoff Barnard (geoff.barnard@cdkn.org) is head of knowledge management at the Climate and Development Knowledge Network (www.cdkn.org)In early October 2011, the Indian government launched a low-cost tablet computer, known as Aakash, in an effort to tackle rural poverty in the country. The device costs around US$50, and runs on the Android 2.2 operating system with a relatively slow 256 megabyte RAM. It has a seven-inch touch-sensitive colour screen, WiFi internet access, two USB ports and a slot for a memory card of up to 32 gigabytes. The battery is expected to last for at least three hours after being fully charged, but can currently only be charged from mains electricity. The developers had hoped to include a solarpower recharging function, but that might only be available in subsequent designs. The software allows word processing, web browsing and video conferencing facilities. Aakash (Hindi for sky), took six years to develop and will initially be available to higher education students who can buy it for half price (US$25).Recognising that many of its customers are farmers, the telecommunications company, Vodafone, has prepared a report looking at the role of cell phones in agriculture. Entitled Connected Agriculture, the report outlines twelve ways in which cell phones could be used to improve the efficiency and sustainability of agricultural value chains.The twelve 'opportunities' include improving mobile financial services, such as payment, micro-insurance and loan systems, and developing platforms to promote the trading, tendering and bartering of agricultural products.Information for farmers, the report says, is crucial for improving production. 'Using mobiles to increase access to expert agricultural information has the advantage of providing real-time support, and could be a more cost-effective way of distributing updates as well as complementing or reinforcing other sources of information that help farmers. 'Improving and building on existing information services that provide news, advice and weather data is one of the suggestions in the report. Increased access to such services through cell phones could, say the authors, generate an additional US$52 billion in agricultural income in 2020.Using cell phones for traceability and improving data availability would also lead to savings from more efficient transport, processing and distribution. A recently commissioned study by MFW4A examined the availability of finance for agriculture in four African countries, Kenya, Ghana, Burkina Faso and Ethiopia. The research analysed the value chains for a variety of commodities, including dairy, fruit, coffee, cocoa and cotton.One of the main findings is that current land tenure systems in many African countries make it difficult for small-scale farmers to invest in their businesses. 'Land reform is essential, ' the research notes, 'to encourage the development of a larger class of \"professional\" farmers willing to invest heavily in farm improvement and expansion with a view to improving The report notes that the expanding range of mobile applications -text messaging, mobile internet and mobile banking -can deliver a multitude of highly relevant services for MSEs. The authors review a number of cases from ACP countries, such as the Digital Early Warning Network, which is helping to fight pests and diseases in Tanzania, and the DrumNet information service in Kenya, which is helping farmers achieve higher sales volumes and incomes through the use of their mobile phones.To be successful, ICTs for private sector development need to factor in both user needs (in terms of what information and other inputs are needed) and possible constraints (for example, literacy rates, aversion to using new tools, scarce electricity and unaffordable user charges and prices). Involving the private sector in the design and provision of training and advisory services can help ensure that the services offered are truly demand-driven.However, the report also stresses that better data, more research and rigorous impact assessments are needed.UNCTAD also makes several policy recommendations, including adopting regulatory frameworks to build confidence in the use of new technologies or new applications, and developing donor guidelines to ensure that the ICT potential is fully reflected in their private sector development strategies. ➜ Download the full report: http://goo.gl/lDA0H weather stations operational in Africa. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) says the continent ideally needs 10,000 http://goo.gl/IxIEy million, the number of people in sub-Saharan Africa living in households without access to electricity in 2009 http://goo.gl/74NGL households in Morphil, Senegal will get solar-powered electricity when a rural electrification project is completed in 2013 http://goo.gl/fkdaqThe World Health Organization (WHO) has launched a website to provide governments and health-care workers with guidelines for tackling malnutrition. The e-Library of Evidence for Nutrition Actions (eLENA) collates scientific data, resources and information related to nutrition. The tool is part of WHO's global drive to help countries improve nutrition and ensure their response includes the agriculture, health, social protection and food security sectors.'Several billion people are affected by one or more types of malnutrition, ' said Dr Ala Alwan, WHO Assistant Director-General of Noncommunicable Diseases and Mental Health. 'Countries need access to the science and evidence-informed guidance to reduce the needless death and suffering associated with malnutrition. eLENA can greatly improve how countries cope with the terrible health threats posed by malnutrition. ' Although currently only available in English, the site will soon be translated into Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian and Spanish. WHO also have plans to distribute the information on CD. ➜ Visit the eLENA website: www.who.int/elena/enThe Rwanda Natural Resources Authority (RNRA) is using GIS to improve the country's land management systems. 'The promotion of GIS will enable Rwanda to get the optimal information concerning infrastructure and business planning, ' said Didier Sagashya, deputy director general in charge of lands and mapping at RNRA. The Authority has already surveyed more than three million plots of land in the Kigali City and Kirehe districts, with further mapping work continuing throughout the country. As part of the process, RNRA will organise training programmes to develop GIS skills in Rwanda, and raise awareness with the land management project. The RNRA has already held workshops with international partners, including the ITC Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation of the University of Twente, in the Netherlands, and Esri, a GIS software developer. Sagashya hopes the project will lead to greater cooperation between the public and private sectors, who will be able to use the data gathered in future developments.IStoCK 585 5719","tokenCount":"8804"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1325787305.json b/data/part_2/1325787305.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1c44dc55e1c3f03b1054ecb925da6cdc28393c56 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1325787305.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f353afc4c5e4e384f5ceea7816aa3ace","source":"gardian_index","url":"http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rcen/v33n1/v33n1a03.pdf","id":"546580538"},"keywords":["White grubs","Rhizophagous","Larva III","Action threshold","Cauca"],"sieverID":"04e5732f-e737-47da-9c3a-c99b80536520","pagecount":"4","content":"Resumen. Este experimento se planteó para determinar el daño económico en el cultivo de yuca causado por diferentes niveles poblacionales de Phyllophaga menetriesi en el departamento del Cauca. Las unidades experimentales consistieron en una estaca más cuatro densidades del insecto en el tercer instar (uno, tres, cinco y siete chisas) confinadas en contenedores plásticos con 0,028 m 3 de suelo agrícola por tratamiento, en seis repeticiones. Se evaluó el daño a la planta con una escala de valor agronómico de cinco niveles, desde planta ideal hasta irrecuperable (uno, tres, cinco, siete y nueve). Se determinó una sobrevivencia de 70% de las plantas atacadas por una sola chisa pero con detrimento del 53% de su potencial productivo por el consumo de corteza, médula y raíces de la estaca. Tres chisas por planta eliminaron el 50% de las unidades experimentales en 56 días y siete en 24. Igualmente siete larvas por planta eliminaron todas las unidades en 35 días. El umbral de acción resultó inferior a una chisa por planta, por lo que se dedujo que se debe evadir la coincidencia de la siembra con el rizófago; o, actuar al encontrarlo en tres plantas de 50/ha monitoreadas al azar.Palabras clave. Chisas. Rizófago. Larva III. Umbral de acción. Cauca.Los rizófagos como Phyllophaga menetriesi (Blanchard, 1850) (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae) afectan significativamente a una gran diversidad de cultivos tropicales durante la fase de establecimiento. La gravedad de los daños infligidos por esta especie, que es la más grande dentro de los rizófagos de importancia económica, va en directa proporción con el tamaño larval; en su tercer estadio alcanza los 4 cm de longitud. Los últimos estudios en la región (Pardo 2002;Pardo et al. 2003), determinaron en Caldono, Cauca, la mayor diversidad de chisas para el suroccidente de Colombia, listando 44 especies entre las que se destacan elementos de gran importancia económica como P. menetriesi, Phyllophaga spp., Plectris fassli (Moser, 1919), Plectris pavida (Burmeister, 1855), Ceraspis innotata (Blanchard, 1850), Astaena valida (Burmeister, 1855) Anomala inconstans (Burm,1844) y Anomala cincta (Say, 1835); sobresaliendo en capacidad de daño P. menetriesi, por haber encontrado hasta cinco larvas por metro cuadrado en cultivos de yuca y café (obs. pers.).Las estacas de yuca utilizadas para propagar al cultivo son afectadas tanto en su corteza como en su médula, a lo que se suman los reportes de ataque a raíces engrosadas, encontrándose en Panamá de una a tres perforaciones grandes en el 2002 (Melo 2005, obs. pers.) y en los departamentos colombianos de Quindío en el 2003 y Casanare en el 2001, galerías en raíces (Herrera 2005). En general se pueden observar parches de cultivos con plantas enanas, cloróticas o marchitas, inclusive baja emergencia de plantas por efecto de las chisas, siendo una sintomatología también observada en cultivos de ciclo más corto como el maíz o el fríjol, en otras latitudes como Centro América (Villalobos 1995;Aragón et al. 1998;Ayala y Monterroso 1998).Los síntomas en la planta se asocian muy poco con el rizófago, como lo han constatado los autores, debido a que la chisa actúa bajo tierra, por lo que cuando el agricultor reemplaza sus plantas perdidas con nuevos propágulos, logra únicamente continuar la alimentación de la chisa e incrementar las pérdidas originales. Hasta la presente investigación se tenían pocos referentes del umbral de acción contra las chisas, como los reportes de Ayala y Monterroso (1998) para el cultivo de maíz o los de Pardo et al. (2003) para yuca y café, quienes coincidían en que se debe actuar cuando se llega a un nivel de tres larvas por planta. Desconociendo este particular, algunos agricultores pudientes han utilizado toda clase de pesticidas sin resultados alentadores, a costo de su salud y la del ambiente además del elevado valor del pesticida, que en algunos casos puede producir resistencia en la plaga obligando al productor a aumentar las dosis con el consecuente incremento de los problemas antes mencionados (Aragón et al. 2003).En estas circunstancias, el Proyecto de Manejo Integrado de Plagas Subterráneas del Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, CIAT, llevó a cabo un experimento con infestación artificial de P. menetriesi, sobre el cultivo de yuca en confinamiento, durante enero y marzo del 2005, en el Departamento del Cauca, Colombia, buscando establecer la población letal y el grado de daño del tercer estado larval.El experimento se llevó a cabo en la Finca Bellavista, ubicada en la Vereda Pescador del Municipio de Caldono, Cauca, a 1.580 m de altitud (2° 49'15,1'' N y 76° 33'45,6'' W). Se experimentó con un cultivo de yuca proveniente de estacas de la variedad SM 707-17 de 20 cm de longitud, obtenidas del tercio medio de plantas madre mantenidas en el banco de germoplasma del CIAT. Las estacas se sembraron verticalmente en baldes de plástico de 40 cm de alto por 30 cm de diámetro, con capacidad para 28.000 cm 3 de suelo agrícola local y con drenaje inferior de 6 cm de diámetro.Se utilizó un diseño experimental de bloques completos aleatorizados (DBCA) donde se probaron cinco tratamientos, siendo estos cero, uno, tres, cinco y siete chisas por unidad experimental. Se conformaron seis bloques de tratamientos. Las larvas de P. menetriesi de tercer estadio inicial, provenientes de la cría en el campus experimental del CIAT, se liberaron conforme a las densidades definidas en los tratamientos, sobre la superficie del sustrato, equidistantes entre sí las plántulas y la pared del balde y reemplazando las chisas que no se introducían después de 10 min, por otras más vigorosas que permanecían desde entonces confinadas.La metodología empleada, si bien confinaba al insecto, trató de replicar las condiciones naturales al ubicar los baldes en zanjas excavadas en uno de los lotes de la finca e introduciéndolos hasta un 95% de su altura, para evitar la influencia de la temperatura y la luz directa del sol sobre las paredes del balde. La superficie interna del sustrato se ubicó a la misma altura que el terreno externo a los baldes.Las larvas se introdujeron al día siguiente de la plantación; y las evaluaciones se iniciaron a los 17 días después de la siembra, tomando datos cada cuatro días, hasta los 60 días que duró el experimento. Las variables registradas fueron: mortalidad de plantas, valor agronómico, tomando en cuenta para ello el vigor del vegetal, desarrollo vegetativo y color de follaje. La escala visual propuesta para la cuantificación de esta última variable consta de cinco niveles (uno, tres, cinco, siete y nueve), donde uno corresponde a una planta ideal y nueve a una irrecuperable; ésta es un ajuste de la escala utilizada para la variable adaptación vegetativa en fitomejoramiento de fríjol (CIAT 1987). Una vez reconocida la muerte de las plantas se extrajo la estaca y se cuantificó el daño externo e interno de la misma, causado por la alimentación del rizófago. Los análisis y las gráficas se hicieron con el paquete informático estadístico INFOSTAT (2005).Daño externo en la estaca de yuca. Una sola larva daña por consumo hasta el 53% de la estaca (corteza y zona cambial), mientras que a partir de tres chisas se llega al 70% de daño externo. Todos los tratamientos resultaron diferentes del testigo absoluto (Tukey P < 0,0001) (Figs. 1 y 2), lo que indicaría que, aún movilizándose la larva en busca de otra estaca fresca para alimentarse, su consumo (daño) comprometería significativamente el potencial de rendimiento de la futura planta pues en su establecimiento carecería del suficiente alimento de reserva para cumplir sus procesos fisiológicos.Daño interno en la estaca de yuca. Con los datos corregidos con la fórmula 1 + x , debido a un coeficiente de variación alto, se encontró que una sola larva (T2) produjo 6,7% de daño interno (barrenado) en la estaca (Figs. 1 y 2); superando el 35% de este daño a partir de cinco chisas por planta (Tukey P ≤ 0,0011). Aunque el daño significativo interno ocurre seguramente por el confinamiento, este resultado y el daño exterior son un claro indicativo de la capacidad de perjuicio de una sola larva por estaca, lo que contradice el estimativo técnico subjetivo de controlar la plaga al encontrar entre tres y cuatro larvas por planta, dado en Ayala y Monterroso (1998) y Pardo et al. (2003). Valor agronómico de la planta de yuca. Aunque hasta los 20 días el testigo y el tratamiento de una chisa por planta tenían un vigor estadísticamente igual, a partir de los 24 días se presentaron diferencias entre el testigo y las plantas con chisas, hospederos que mostraron una tendencia a deteriorarse en forma directamente proporcional a la densidad de la plaga y al paso del tiempo, llegando incluso a morir la totalidad de las unidades experimentales de los tratamientos con tres y más chisas en menos de dos meses (Fig. 3). La información obtenida coincide con lo advertido en campo por los agricultores y en estudios formales como los de Arguello et al. (1999), quienes mencionan que las poblaciones de chisas rizófagas pueden afectar hasta el 100% de una plantación en siete o 10 días en sitios con altas poblaciones de larvas, como en las zonas de Miraflor (Estelí, Nicaragua), donde se encontraron hasta 50 larvas por metro lineal; observándose este daño cada año.Durante los dos meses del experimento la densidad de una chisa por planta no eliminó al 50% de las unidades experimentales (Fig. 4), pero la pérdida del 30% de éstas en solo 49 días es irreparable, con base en lo expuesto por Bellotti et al. (2002). Cabe destacar que tres chisas/planta, un promedio comúnmente encontrado por los autores en la naturaleza, eliminaron al 50% de las unidades experimentales de yuca en solo 56 días desde la plantación. Observado el vigor de estas plantas y, según lo encontrado por Ortega-Ojeda et al. (2005), si el daño de las chisas se detiene al llegar éstas a prepupa, las plantas sobrevivientes tendrán muy bajo rendimiento de número y peso de raíces comerciales.Lo anterior apoya que se pueden pronosticar niveles de daño radicular a partir de la observación de los síntomas foliares, conforme con lo encontrado en un estudio sobre yuca a campo abierto, por Ortega-Ojeda et al. (2005). Sin embargo, este indicativo deberá detectarse muy tempranamente (dentro del mes de edad del cultivo), para eliminar las chisas del sitio afectado y reemplazar el propágulo, porque según los resultados el umbral de acción estaría por debajo de una chisa por planta. Al ejercer medidas de control en el nivel tres de daño, si bien no se recuperaría el rendimiento original, tampoco se perdería del todo la inversión en semilla; por tanto, a fin de mantener las pérdidas bajo el 5%, se deberían aplicar medidas de control al encontrar tres plantas con chisas, de 50 por hectárea revisadas al azar.Aunque sobreviven el 70% de las plantas de yuca atacadas por una sola chisa, éstas pierden al menos el 53% de su potencial productivo por el consumo del rizófago de corteza, médula y raíces de la estaca, durante la etapa de establecimiento del cultivo. Tres chisas por planta eliminaron el 50% de las unidades experimentales de yuca en solo 56 días; mientras que siete llegaron a este porcentaje en solo 24 días y al 100% de la mortalidad de las plantas en 35 días.El umbral de acción contra las chisas resultó ser inferior a una larva por planta; por tanto, para mantener las pérdidas del cultivo de yuca por debajo el 5% como política empresarial, se deben tomar acciones al encontrar tres plantas con chisas de 50 monitoreadas al azar por hectárea. De todo el estudio se deduce que el mejor control de P. menetriesi se debe hacer evadiendo al tercer instar que es el estado de desarrollo más dañino y, tomando medidas de remediación dentro de los primeros 30 días de edad del cultivo.Figura 3. Efecto de las diferentes densidades de chisas en el valor agronómico (vigor) de la planta de yuca en el tiempo. Vigor uno corresponde a una planta excelente, y nueve a una planta irrecuperable. Se incluye el error estándar (Tukey P ≤ 0,05). Figura 4. Días de consumo vs. mortalidad de plantas de yuca, con cuatro densidades de chisas (línea de corte en el 50% de los seis bloques del experimento) (Tukey P ≤ 0,05).","tokenCount":"2021"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1327616726.json b/data/part_2/1327616726.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4ba6daaa9fe5dacbeecefca90b71782aefca37ad --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1327616726.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6c0dac924faa2dd51d6e4edb5ad6d7ad","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/f57bcaba-7dd2-4992-9b6a-ffac05103d42/retrieve","id":"62833540"},"keywords":["climate security","social media","text mining","sentiment analysis","online issue mapping","digital methods"],"sieverID":"10748a76-4817-4e0d-950e-28f5c47e91c3","pagecount":"8","content":"Despite increasing awareness of the nexus between climate change and human security, especially in fragile contexts, this complex relationship has yet to be reflected in the policy arena. To investigate this potential policy gap, we apply an online issue mapping approach to assess representations of climate security within the public discourse of policymakers on social media, using Kenya as a case study. Considering Twitter as a proxy for public debate, text mining and network analysis techniques were employed to a corpus of almost 50 thousand tweets from selected national-level state actors, aiming to identify the evolution of thematic trends and actor dynamics. Results show a disassociation between climate, socioeconomic insecurities, and conflict in the public communications of national policymakers. These findings can have useful implications for the policy cycle, indicating where policy attention around climate security-related topics has been and what are the entry points for enhancing sensitivity on the issue.Climate security refers to climate-related threats to societies, communities and individuals that encompass risks directly or indirectly caused by climate change, including the potential for conflict. The relationship between climate and conflict has been receiving increased attention in the past decade, as the climate crisis has been shown to impact social and political stability. However, despite heightened awareness regarding potential linkages between climate, peace and security, such connections have yet to be reflected in the policy arena. Policy cycles for climate adaptation and mitigation, as well as national security concerns, often fail to reflect the complex pathways that link the two dimensions (Brzoska 2012).To explore the potential policy gap related to the climate-security nexus, a data-driven method was developed to assess representations of climate security as a topic of governance within the public discourse of state actors, using Kenya as a case study. While the country is characterised as relatively peaceful compared to some of its neighbours, climate variability and extremes have had adverse impacts on agricultural production. Compounded by external shocks that exacerbate existing inequalities, Kenya faces increased risks of resource-related violence (CGIAR FOCUS Climate Security, 2022). Consequently, though climate may not directly impact localized conflict dynamics, its context-specific interactions with socioeconomic and political factors can shape and increase risks of human insecurity and conflict.While extensive research about climate change discourses on social media have been conducted, focusing on various subjects such as issue polarization, disinformation, activism, and climate communication (see Pearce et al 2019 andFalkenberg et al 2022, among many others), this study investigates this study relies on the foundations of Digital Methods (Rogers 2013;Carneiro et al 2022) to explore climate security narratives and dynamics among policy actors. An online issue mapping approach (Rogers et al. 2015) was applied to investigate two main questions: 1) How salient are climate security issues in national policy agendas? 02) How are linkages between climate, socioeconomic risks and insecurities, and conflict represented in the public narratives of policymakers? Insights emerging from this analysis provide a starting point for the development of evidence-based advocacy and engagement strategies so that effective responses to climate change are sensitive to the interlinkages with the human security context in the country.Twitter has been widely recognized as an important venue for institutional communications; news media increasingly rely on the platform as a primary source of official statements and positiontaking. Its potential as a real-time, topic-driven platform enables rapid detection of trends to uncover discourse dynamics (McDonald 2013). Hence, to frame perceptions around the climate-socioeconomic insecurities-conflict nexus at the national policy level in Kenya, Bia Silveira Carneiro, Giuliano Resce, Giosuè Ruscica, Giulia Tucci an analysis of government communications on Twitter was performed. An algorithm was developed to extract all publicly available Tweets from the official accounts of central government bodies, ministries of agriculture, environment, and natural resources, as well as national security bodies (Table 1), from which the presence of a climate security taxonomy was explored. In total, 49,335 Tweets were collected between 2012-09-13 to 2022-05-26. Carneiro et al (2022), in which topics were matched to AGROVOC1, the Food and Agriculture Organization's (FAO) open-source, multilingual vocabulary. For each topic, the corresponding AGROVOC concept was extracted, and a custom algorithm was developed to detect and classify the related terminology within the text of Tweets. Topics were then assessed through correlation measures to identify any interlinkages.In addition, leveraging on the specific affordance of Twitter that enables direct conversations among users, a network analysis assesses the relationships among policy actors through a mentions network (Williams et al 2015), where accounts are the nodes and their relations are the lines connecting pairs of nodes. This means that accounts are connected if they are mentioned by another, with the weight of the connection calculated from the number of mentions by the same account.Drawing on the mechanisms through which climate stressors may interact with socioeconomic, ecological, and political dimensions identified in Kenya, figure 1 shows their overall distribution, as frequency counts. 'Famine' and 'Aid programmes' are the most regularly mentioned topics, followed by resource availability and access pathway variables 'Ethnic groups' and 'Cattle'. The most present topics for climate variables are 'Risk' and 'Weather hazards' and for conflict variables are 'Crime' and 'Sexual violence'. While the overall distribution of variables uncovers the cumulative prominence of topics, a temporal distribution provides a more nuanced perception of topic prevalence over time.Beyond the presence or absence of a topic, the algorithm also quantified their presence2. Figure 2 presents timelines for the prevalence of climate variables (top) and conflict variables (bottom) in the corpus of tweets. The visualisation indicates not only which topics were in focus, but also when they were of most interest. Among climate variables, 'Drought' presents several major peaks. In 2018 and 2022, they reflect consecutive failed seasons that led the Kenyan government to declare a national disaster in several parts of the country in 20213.The conflict timeline shows higher variability among topics, with 'Armed conflict', 'Dispute', 'Theft', and 'Crime' oscillating between peaks and low prevalence. As noted by DuttaGupta et al (2022), 'Theft' is most likely associated to livestock raiding, a significant problem in the country's rural areas, whereas the increase in 'Disputes' in the last five years points to increased attention to conflict over resources. To further unpack the interlinkages between different topics within the Tweets, a measure of correlation was established to identify when terms are present within the same body of text.A strong positive correlation indicates that the terms consistently occur within the same Tweet, whereas a negative correlation denotes they are occurring in separate Tweets. Figure 3 displays the 10 topics most positively correlated to climate variables (right) and to conflict variables (left). In the case of climate, the strongest associations are to livelihood and food security pathway and resource availability and access pathway variables; conflict is not represented in the table. Conversely, conflict-related content is frequently co-occuring with several climate and socioecological variables, namely 'Desertification', 'Risk', 'Climate change, 'Poaching', 'Environmental degradation', and 'Resource management'.Direct associations between climate and conflict are presented in Figure 4, which features the correlations among the six conflict types described in the impact pathways and climate stressors and socioecological variables. The strongest positive associations (in blue) concern 'Disputes' with 'Erosion', 'Theft' with 'Rain', and 'Violence' with 'Environmental degradation'. However, it is notable that most variables present negative associations (in red), meaning that the connection between climate and conflict is largely absent from the official discourse of Kenyan government actors on Twitter. Lastly, the mentions network in figure 6 presents a visualization of the dynamics between the key state bodies representing climate, agriculture, natural resources and security interests. As the focus of this analysis is on the interaction between national security and climate adaptation and mitigation policy narratives, the network was filetered to display only the connections between the 13 government accounts. The spatialization of nodes was estimated with the force-directed algorithm Fruchterman-Reingold (Fruchterman and Reingold 1991) , which moves nodes further or closer from each other in an attempt to find an equilibrium. The sizes of the nodes and the labels are partitioned by degree centrality, a measure of the number of connections to a particular node, whereas the edges are also weighed by the number of times a pair of nodes is connected. The graph points to the strongest connections between the ministries and central government accounts, but to weaker or non-reciprocal linkages between ministries from the different areas.Content analysis and network analysis techniques enable identification of trends in political agendas and actors over time. The machine-driven approach employed to explore the salience of climate security in the Twitter communications of Kenyan policy actors found that the pathways that link climate stressors, socioeconomic risks, and conflict are not well represented in the narratives of government bodies. While Tweets that addressed different types of conflict did show some association to ecological threats, most climate and conflict variables were negatively correlated. Further, the weaker or absent connections in the network analysis point to to potential gaps in dialogue.A limitation of our analysis is that social media narratives may not fully capture the complexity of policy cycles in a country like Kenya, where policy actors interact across multiple scales, and this engagement may not be adequately represented in digital platforms. Moreover, the African continent continues to have the lowest Internet access, with Kenya's internet penetration rate at 32.7 percent of the total population at the start of 2023, and Twitter reaching 3.5 percent of the total population4. However, given the continued trend to integrate digital platforms in policy and governance, especially during times of crisis such as the Covid-19 pandemic or natural disaster responses, this study contributes towards mapping policymaker perspectives in public discourse. Our findings can have useful policy implications, indicating where policy attention around climate security-related topics has been, as well as what are the gaps and entry points for enhancing sensitivity on the issue, facilitating the integration of the climate security debate into Kenya's formal policy arena. ","tokenCount":"1642"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1330422965.json b/data/part_2/1330422965.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ef5ae3951df480a635c747de934447c81a4fd51a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1330422965.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f4f74ccdbe42d35726d6ff3d324ab9f5","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/15bd2b29-8bd0-48f7-b46b-56e34b66eec9/content","id":"-86771630"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"6d0f61ee-fbfb-4928-b179-f42c840a77e8","pagecount":"22","content":"Fonctionnement d'un moteur à combustion interne Objectif général : A la fin de ce cours l'apprenant doit être capable d'expliquer le fonctionnement d'un moteur à combustion interne Objectifs spécifiques : ❑ Définir les quatre phases de fonctionnement d'un moteur à combustion interne ; ❑ De citer les organes composants d'un moteur à combustion interne. Consigne : Lisez attentivement le document mis à votre disposition et exécutez les tâches proposées. Texte : Euloge un élève en 1 ère année de Mécanique Automobile du Lycée technique de pobè pousse sa curiosité à comprendre le fonctionnement d'un moteur à combustion interne, un cours qui sera déroulé la séance prochaine par son professeur de spécialité. Au cours de ces recherches il découvre ce qui suit : « Le moteur est l'organe principal et central de la voiture. Il produit l'énergie nécessaire à son fonctionnement. Il fonctionne en quatre étapes, on dit qu'il s'agit d'un moteur à quatre temps. Dans le moteur sont creusés des cylindres et à l'intérieur de chaque cylindre se trouve un piston. Chaque cylindre est fermé au-dessus par une culasse dotée de deux ouvertures, dont l'une est fermée par une soupape d'admission, et l'autre par une soupape d'échappement. Les pistons descendent, aspirant du carburant et de l'air, soit un mélange admis dans les cylindres. En remontant, tout ce mélange est comprimé dans les cylindres, on parle de la compression. Arrivé en fin de course (Point Mort Haut), il se produit une combustion de ce mélange grâce à une étincelle jaillissant d'une bougie. On dit qu'il y a explosion ; cette explosion renvoie alors les pistons vers le bas (Point Mort Bas). Le piston remonte à nouveau pour pousser les gaz d'échappement vers le milieu extérieur au moteur, on parle de l'échappement des gaz. Le cycle recommencera alors à zéro. Chaque piston dans les cylindres est relié à une bielle, une petite pièce métallique qui a pour fonction de convertir le mouvement de va-et-vient du piston en un mouvement de rotation qui est transmis au vilebrequin auquel il est relié. Le vilebrequin à son tour transmet le mouvement de rotation à une unité motrice, ce qui permet de mettre la voiture ou l'équipement en mouvement ». Le document ci-après montre les quatre temps (étapes ou phases) de fonctionnement d'un moteur à combustion interne.V-Étude de la transmission de Unités MotricesPrévoir une évaluation formative écrite ou sommative A la fin de son séjour, l'apprenant doit être capable de :- A la fin de son séjour, l'apprenant doit être capable de : -Intervenir de façon efficace sur les systèmes de direction, freinage et de relevage hydraulique","tokenCount":"431"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1354317649.json b/data/part_2/1354317649.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c3c52cef3e27729b153686db6054800f293dc4e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1354317649.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"949dd95f5f47c2f2d7aed135fd144587","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/616a61da-5ca7-4fab-9437-60a1c62009f6/retrieve","id":"1486285789"},"keywords":["agriculture management","tillage","fungal community","diversity indices","climate smart agricultural practices","soil organic carbon"],"sieverID":"ea988990-e80b-4f8e-8120-28b7f0fb9920","pagecount":"15","content":"Sharma PC ( ) Climate-smart agricultural practices influence the fungal communities and soil properties under major agri-food systems.Rice-wheat (RW) system is the dominant cropping system of the Indo-Gangetic Plains of South Asia, spreading over a 13.5 M ha area (Gupta and Seth, 2007). In this system, farmers follow conventional agricultural practices, such as repeated tillage, open field residue burning, indiscreet use of fertilizers, and irrigation waters, which lead to soil health deterioration, groundwater depletion, and environmental pollution (Jat et al., 2021a). In the 21st century, climate change with extreme weather events is likely to be the most serious issue being faced by mankind as per the IPCC predictions (IPCC, 2022). To adapt to extreme events and to manage natural resources, climate-smart agriculture (CSA)-based management practices on the principles of conservation agriculture (CA) (zero tillage, residue retention, and crop rotation) and mitigation co-benefits may prove an excellent option for conventional agriculture to maintain the sustainability of soil and cropping system. In CSA practices, the conventional management practices switch over to resource-conserving management practices by layering with zero/no-tillage, residue retention/incorporation, crop diversification, precise irrigation water, and nutrient management practices to sustain soil and farm productivity and environmental quality (Choudhary et al., 2020). In CSA, residues are managed through retention or incorporation, which are burnt by the farmers under conventional management practices. Crop residues provide an ambient environment for soil fungi, but their density and diversity depend upon the type of residue served. Different types of crop rotations provide different types of root exudates, which influence microbial community compositions (Huang et al., 2014;Jiang et al., 2016). Crop rotation and tillage practices disturb soils and influence the distribution of microbes in the soil layer (Orrù et al., 2021). Fungi play a great role in agricultural practices in nutrient cycling, transformation, and availability.Soil is the base of all civilizations and mankind, therefore, its functions and structure, directly and indirectly, influence food security. Soil functions are governed by climatic, edaphic, and anthropogenic activities. Soil properties and composition of the soil microbiota are directly interrelated with each other (Wakelin et al., 2008;Bender et al., 2016). Soil microbial communities are essential to biogeochemical cycles, and especially fungi play an important role in the biodegradation of organic matter (Rineau et al., 2012;Qiu et al., 2018). They dominate the microbial biomass in soil habitats (Joergensen and Wichern, 2008) and contribute to nutrient cycling (Stromberger, 2005). Soils have dynamic environments and the microorganisms that live in these soil habitats respond to the changing soil conditions. It has been found that more genera and species of fungi exist in the soil than in any other environment (Nagmani et al., 2006). Fungi are the primary decomposers in soils and secrete various enzymes, such as cellulases, laccases, and xylanases that break down lignocelluloses into simple sugars (Maza et al., 2014;Choudhary et al., 2016). A comprehensive understanding of the fungal community in agricultural soils provides the path to study their roles in the soil ecosystem. The relationship between the biodiversity of soil fungi and ecosystem function is an important issue, particularly in the concern of global climate change and human alteration of ecosystem processes. Fungi play an important role in soil formation, structure, and fertility by contributing to the nutrient cycle and maintenance of the ecosystem (Stromberger, 2005;Hoorman, 2011). Agricultural practices that impact soil conditions can significantly alter soil microbial community composition (Choudhary et al., 2018a,b). The differences in microbial community composition are mainly been attributed to differences in the soil properties (physical and chemical), which are linked to agricultural management practices (IPCC, 2022). Some studies reported the effects of different tillage practices on soil chemical and physical properties and microbial activities, and they reported better soil properties under zero tillage (ZT) and residue retention practices (Choudhary et al., 2018c,d). Agricultural management practices have an impact on different parameters of soil. Under CA practices, better soil physical properties such as lower bulk density (Li et al., 2019), enhanced saturated hydraulic conductivity (Patra et al., 2019), higher infiltration rate (Jat et al., 2018), and increased water-stable aggregates (Bhattacharyya et al., 2012;Jat et al., 2019a) were reported than conventional management practices in cereal-based systems. Increased nutrient availability (Zahid et al., 2020), soil organic carbon (Bera et al., 2017), and nitrogen (Bhattacharyya et al., 2018) were favored under notillage/ZT and residue management-based practices. In the western Indo-Gangetic Plains, higher soil biological properties and soil health were reported with CA-based management practices (Choudhary et al., 2018c,d;Sharma et al., 2021).In any agriculture system, different soil processes depend on microbial community compositions. The diverse nature of fungal communities makes them an important factor for sustainable agriculture in the changing scenarios of climate change (Yadav et al., 2020). The impact of different agricultural management regimes on fungal community composition gained rising interest, although up to date, only a few studies were dedicated to determining the effects of tillage, fertilization, and crop rotation on microbial diversity in cereal systems (Sharma-Poudyal et al., 2017;Choudhary et al., 2018b;Piazza et al., 2019). To date, some studies have applied next-generation sequencing techniques in South Asia to investigate the influence of different tillage regimes and types of crop residue management on soil fungal communities (Choudhary et al., 2018a,b). Our study focused on the changes in the fungal communities under the layering of different management practices, such as soil tillage (conventional vs. zero tillage), residue management (without residue vs. residue retention), crop rotation (ricewheat vs. maize-wheat), and irrigation (border vs. subsurface drip). The ultimate objective was to identify the impact of layering of management practices on the composition of soil fungal communities.A 9-year (2009-2018) long-term production scale fixed plot experiment was conducted at the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Central Soil Salinity Research Institute (29.42 • N latitude, 76.57 • E longitude, and at an elevation of 243 m.a.s.l.), Karnal, India. The soil of the experimental field is silty loam in texture and falls under the Typic Natrustalf category (Soil Survey Division Staff, 1993). The experiment included six cerealbased scenarios varied with residue, tillage, crop, irrigation, and nutrient supply (Figure 1). The treatments are described as scenarios because they are varied in multiple indicators, namely, tillage, crop establishment, residue management, irrigation management, system intensification, etc. Initially, the experiment started with four scenarios, and later on, in 2016, two more scenarios (ScV and ScVI) were added (Choudhary et al., 2020;Jat et al., 2021b) with minor changes in ScIII and ScIV, and only irrigation management was precise (subsurface drip irrigation was used instead of border irrigation). The details of all the scenarios along with their management practices are presented in Table 1. Scenario III and ScIV were based on the principles of CA practices, so they were described as partial CSA. However, in ScV and ScVI, in addition to ScIII and ScIV, irrigation water and N were precisely managed using subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) and called full CSA. Scenarios were structured in a randomized complete block design and replicated three times. In ScI (farmers' practice or business as usual), both rice and wheat were established with conventional practice. Rice was planted by manual transplanting with 25-30 days old seedlings in puddled fields and wheat was planted by manual broadcasting in tilled soil under ScI. In ScII, manual transplanting for rice in a random geometry (20 × 15 cm) was done. In other scenarios (zero tillage (ZT) conditions), all the crops (rice, wheat, and mungbean) were planted with a row spacing of 22.5 cm using Happy Seeder with an inclined plate seed metering mechanism. However, maize was seeded by Happy Seeder at a row spacing of 67.5 cm. In the farmers' practice (ScI), all the crop residues of rice and wheat were removed from the ground level. However, in other scenarios, it was managed as per the details presented in Table 1. The total amount of crop residue in different scenarios ranged from 100.5 to 119.25 Mg ha −1 in 9 years of study (Table 1). Maize-based scenario received the highest (∼119 Mg ha −1 ) amount of crop residue, while the rice was based on the range of 100-105 Mg ha −1 . The NPK dose (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potash) was given as per the recommendation of CCS Haryana Agricultural University for all the crops. In the subsurface drip-irrigated scenario (ScV and ScVI), 80% of the total N as urea (minus N added through DAP and NPK complex) was applied through irrigation (fertigation). In rice, maize, and wheat, irrigation was applied based on soil moisture potential (SMP) using a tensiometer.The soil samples were collected from all six scenarios (three from each scenario) at 0-15 cm soil depth after harvesting of wheat crop in May 2018. The soil surface was cleaned by removing crop residues and samples were taken randomly aseptically using an auger. Collected soil samples (18 samples) were sieved with 2 mm mesh to eliminate large soil aggregates and plant roots. Samples were divided into three parts, one part was immediately transferred to the laboratory, stored at −20 • C until DNA was extracted, and the second part is stored in the refrigerator at 4 • C for further analysis of biological properties. The third part was airdried, ground, and stored in glass containers for chemical and physical analysis.From the soil samples, DNA was extracted by MO BIO's PowerSoil R DNA Isolation Kit as per the instructions of the manufacturer. The quantity and quality of DNA were measured by Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively. ITS1 and ITS2 sequencing libraries were constructed by a two-step PCRbased workflow. For round one PCR, using a template of 10-100 ng metagenomic DNA, ITS1 and ITS2 regions were amplified using region-specific proprietary primers developed at Genotypic Technology Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India. The protocol also includes overhang adapter sequences that were appended to the primer pair sequences for compatibility with Illumina index and sequencing adapters. PCR was carried out for 26 cycles (hotstart 95 • C/3 min, denaturation 95 • C/30 s, annealing 55 • C/30 s, extension 68 • C/1 min, elongation 68 • C/5 min, and infinite hold at 4 • C) using 0.5 µM primers. The resultant amplicons were analyzed on 1.5% agarose gel whereby the desired amplicons were observed to be of sizes ∼350-450 bp for ITS1 and ∼450-500 bp for ITS2. For the second round of PCR, 1 µl of 1:2 diluted round one PCR amplicons were taken and amplified for 10 cycles to add Illumina sequencing barcoded adaptors (Nextera XT v2 Index Kit, Illumina, USA). Second round PCR amplicons (sequencing libraries) were analyzed on 1.5% agarose gel, then purified using Ampure XP magnetic beads (Beckman Coulter, USA), and concentrations were measured using Qubit dsDNA HS assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The ITS1 and ITS2 amplicons were generated separately by individual PCRs and libraries were constructed off these amplicons individually. The sample libraries were normalized based on the qubit concentrations, then multiplexed on the MiSeq flowcell, and sequenced using a 300PE read length chemistry.The forward and reverse primers (White et al., 1990;Fujita et al., 2001) were as follows:ITS1_Forward TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG. ITS1_Reverse GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC. ITS2_Forward GCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGC. ITS2_Reverse TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC.We have adapted our primer design based on fungal rDNA sequencing literature targeting the conserved regions of 5.8S rDNA and 28S rDNA. ITS1 primers were used to amplify the intervening 5.8S rDNA and the adjacent ITS1 region. ITS2 primers were used to amplify a longer region across the 5.8S rDNA through the intervening ITS2 region and the large 28S subunit.The organic carbon (OC) content of the soils was determined using the wet oxidation method (Walkley and Black, 1934). The available nitrogen (N) in soil was determined by the alkaline permanganate method of Subbiah and Asija (1956), available phosphorus (P) by the ascorbic acid reductant method of Olsen et al. (1954), and available potassium (K) by flame photometer using neutral 1N ammonium acetate extractant as described by Jackson (1973). Mean weight diameter (MWD) and water-stable aggregates (WSA) were determined following the method of Jat et al. (2019b). Soil bulk density (BD) was measured by core sampler method (Blake and Hartge, 1986).At maturity, crops were harvested manually for grain and straw yields according to residue management protocols. Grain yield was expressed as Mg ha −1 at 14, 12, and 14% grain moisture content for rice, wheat, and maize, respectively. Grain yields of maize, rice, wheat, and mungbean were converted to the rice equivalent yield (REY) by using Equation 1.where, MSP, Minimum support price of Govt. of India; INR, Indian Rupee.The Illumina paired-end reads were de-multiplexed using Bc12fastq software v2.20 and FastQ files were generated based on the unique dual barcode sequences. The sequencing quality was assessed using FastQC v0.11.8 software (Andrews, 2010). Raw reads with primer sequence were processed using the Cutadapt tool (Martin, 2011). The adapter sequences were trimmed and bases above Q30 were considered, and lowquality bases were filtered off during read preprocessing and used for downstream analysis. The high-quality R1 and R2 reads were filtered and stitched using Fastq-join (Aronesty, 2013). ITS1 and ITS2 sequences were merged and considered for further analysis using the QIIME pipeline (Caporaso et al., 2010). The query sequences were clustered using the UCLUST (Edgar, 2010) method against the reference UNITE (Abarenkov et al., 2010) database (ver7) with 97% similarity. The reads, which did not hit the reference database, were then clustered using the de novo method where reads are clustered against one another without any external reference sequence collection. Taxonomy was assigned through the BLAST method (Altschul et al., 1990), with an e-value of 0.001. The BIOM file generated was taken ahead for further advanced analysis and visualization. The rarefied biom at a depth of 177,000 for merged ITS sequences/samples was used for the calculation of alpha diversity indices using various metrics. Sequences from all six agricultural management scenarios have been submitted to NCBI with the Bio project: PRJNA563827.Biplot and principal component analysis (PCA) were done with JMP 14.1 software. The results were submitted to PCA to determine the common relationships between fungi classes, soil physical properties, and SOC, N, P, and K contents of the soil. The crop yield data were analyzed by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) technique for a completely randomized block design using SAS 9.1 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Differences among treatment means were compared using Tukey's HSD test at the 5% probability level.From the 18 soil samples, three of each from six scenarios, a total of 12,468,774 paired-end reads were obtained after processing of sequences, and a total of 5,033,723 sequences were obtained. Fungal diversity was calculated by different indices, such as Shannon's diversity index, Simpson's diversity index, and Chao1. Diversity indices were found to be significantly affected by agricultural management systems, as Shannon's diversity index, Simpson's diversity index, Chao1, and observed species/OTU were varied in scenarios (Table 2). Shannon diversity index was found to be 1.47 times higher in maizebased scenarios (ScIV and ScVI) as compared to rice-based CSA scenarios (ScIII and ScV). A similar pattern was observed for the Simpson index, as it was 1.12 times higher in maize-based A total of seven fungal phyla were present in all six scenarios. Ascomycota is the dominating phyla followed by Basidiomycota and Zygomycota (Figure 2). A higher abundance of Ascomycota was observed in rice-based CSA scenarios (ScIII and ScV) as compared to maize-based scenarios (ScIV and ScVI). In rice-based scenarios (ScI, ScII, ScIII, and ScV), Ascomycota was followed by Basidiomycota but in maize-based scenarios (ScIV and ScVI), it was followed by Zygomycota. Higher Ascomycota (1.31 times) was found in ScIII than ScII, whereas, Glomeromycota was found 7 times higher in ScII than ScIII and 1.66 times higher in ScIV than ScVI. Chytridiomycota was found non-significantly higher in maizebased scenarios as compared to rice-based scenarios. In all six scenarios, a total of 48 classes were observed. Sordariomycetes, an unidentified class of Ascomycota, and Dothideomycetes are among the dominating classes (Table 3). The highest abundance was observed for Sordariomycetes (25.45-43.47%), except for ScV in which an unidentified class of Ascomycota (39.30%) was found in the highest abundance. The abundance of Sordariomycetes was found at par among all the scenarios. The relative abundance of the unidentified class of Ascomycota was found to be 7.8 times higher in CSA-based rice systems compared with maize systems. Although the difference in class Agaricomycetes was non-significant among scenarios, it was two times higher in maize-based scenarios (7.72%) as compared to rice-based scenarios (3.83%). The abundance of Mortierellomycotina_cls_Incertae_sedis class of Zygomycota was recorded 8.4 times higher in maize-based scenarios than in rice-based scenarios. Ascomycota unidentified class was respectively higher in ScIII (2.72 times) than that in ScII and 1.42 times higher in ScV than ScIII. Pezizomycetes class was 6.84 times, Glomeromycetes was 6.97 times, Saccharomycetes was 3.75 times, and Blastocladiomycetes was 8.5 times higher in ScII than that in ScIII. At the level of order, Hypocreales was the dominating order followed by Pleosporales, Pezizales, and Sordariales (Supplementary Table 1).Differences among the scenarios were recorded for soil chemical and physical parameters. Soil organic carbon (SOC) and available nitrogen (N) were 1.43 and 1.34 times higher in CSA-based scenarios (ScII, ScIII, ScIV, ScV, and ScVI) compared with farmers' practice (ScI). Available phosphorus and potassium were found to be 1.65 and 1.60 times higher, respectively, in the soil of CSA-based scenarios than that in the CT scenario/farmers' practice. All four SOC (5.7 ± 0.01 g kg −1 ), N (119.01 ± 0.58 kg ha −1 ), P (16.1 ± kg ha −1 ), and K (137 ± kg ha −1 ) were lowest with farmers' practice (ScI). Bulk density was observed highest in ScI (1.58) followed by ScII (1.52) (Table 4). It was lower in rice-based CSA scenarios (1.36) as compared to maize-based scenarios (1.445). The highest mean weight diameter was found in ScIII (2.95 mm) and ScV (2.70 mm) and the lowest was observed in ScI (1.45 mm). Waterstable aggregate was non-significant in full/CSA scenarios but significantly higher in ScII (68.3%) and farmers' practice (62.7%) than that in other scenarios.The total residue load in ScI, ScII, ScIII, ScIV, ScV, and ScVI was 105, 101, 119, 101, and 119 Mg ha −1 , respectively. During the year 2018, a higher yield of wheat was recorded with all the CSA-based scenarios (ScIII-ScVI) and ranged from 6.58 to 6.79 Mg ha −1 . The lowest yield was recorded with farmers' practice, that is, 5.88 Mg ha −1 . A similar trend was also observed for the system yield in all the scenarios (Table 4). The higher system yield was recorded with ScVI (16.85 Mg ha −1 ) followed by ScII (16.19 Mg ha −1 ) and ScIV (16.04 Mg ha −1 ). The lowest yield was found with farmers' practice or ScI (13.33 Mg ha −1 ).The results from the principal component analysis provided evidence that the different scenarios were diverse regarding the fungi classes, soil physical properties, and SOC, N, P, and K contents of the soil (Figure 3). According to the factor loadings, the first PC, which explains 48.8% of the total variance, had higher positive correlations with Agaricomycetes, Saccharomycetes, Blastocladiomycetes, and bulk density (BD), and a negative correlation with SOC, N, WSA, and MWD, while the second PC, which explains 16.76% of the total variance, was strongly correlated with Chytridiomycetes, Mortierellomycotina_cls_Incertae_sedis, and Pezizomycotina_cls_Incertae_sedis. The third PC explains 12.6% of the total variance and is correlated with Dothideomycetes (Supplementary Table 2). The PCA biplot in Figure 3 shows both PC scores of samples and the loadings of variables.Significant correlations were observed among the fungi classes, soil physical properties, and SOC, N, P, and K contents of soil irrespective of scenarios (Table 5). An unidentified class of fungi was significantly negatively correlated to Pezizomycetes, Chytridiomycetes, and Pezizomycotina_cls_Incertae_sedis. Dothideomycetes was significantly negatively correlated to WSA and MWD. Agaricomycetes was significantly positively correlated to Pezizomycetes, Saccharomycetes, and Blastocladiomycetes, and negatively correlated to the available N content of the soil. Eurotiomycetes was significantly positively correlated to Pezizomycetes, Tremellomycetes, and WSA was significantly positively correlated to MWD and C and K contents. MWD was positively correlated to the C and K contents of the soil. BD was significantly negatively correlated to C, N, P, and K contents of the soil. Soil carbon was positively correlated to the N, P, and K contents of the soil. The available N was significantly positively correlated with available P and K content of the soil. The available P was significantly positively correlated to the available K content of the soil.Conservation agriculture-based practices showed higher Shannon and Simpson diversity indices in maize-based scenarios as compared to rice-based scenarios due to the inclusion of maize in the crop rotation system. Although sampling of soil was done in all scenarios after harvesting the common crop among them (wheat), the residue and root system of the previous crop can impact soil properties. Fungal diversity is directly or indirectly affected by plant and soil properties (Yang et al., 2017). Maize has a different root system than rice (tap root instead of fibrous root system); the amount and composition of root exudates vary with crops/plants, which can influence the microbial diversity of soil (Sasse et al., 2018). Moreover, the quantity and quality of residue also play a critical role in the microbial properties of soil (Moore et al., 2000). Maize residue provides higher amounts of lignocellulosic material, which can harbor more types of residue-decomposing fungi, hence showing higher fungal diversity than rice-based CA practices. Similar results were reported in our previous study (Choudhary et al., 2018b) based on 5 years of continuous CA-based practices. This combination of residue retention and incorporation in one calendar year may be the reason for the highest diversity indices in this scenario II instead of only crop residue retention in a similar cropping system. Through the tillage practices, crop residues mix well in the soil and alter the microclimate and distribution of nutrients, which resulted in higher fungal diversity under partial CA practice than that in other practices where only crop residues were retained.Ascomycota, found as a dominating phylum in all management scenarios, is well known as one of the most abundant fungal phyla of soils globally (Choudhary et al., 2018a,b;Egidi et al., 2019;Maguire et al., 2020). Ascomycota is the largest phylum of fungi and is ubiquitous in soil (Money, 2016;Egidi et al., 2019). Most Ascomycota members are saprophytic and the main decomposers of plant residue in the soil, hence they dominate the fungal community composition in soils. In our study, a higher abundance of Ascomycota was observed in rice-based CA scenarios as compared to maizebased scenarios due to the difference between residues. Since soil samples were taken after the harvesting of the wheat crop (common crop in all scenarios) and by that time ample duration (5 months for maize and rice residue) has been received by the residue to decompose. Initially, the residue decomposes fast due to the presence of water-soluble compounds in the residues, which are easily decomposable (Diochon et al., 2016), but in later stages, decomposition of more recalcitrant compounds such as lignin and cellulose takes place. The composition of residue and decomposition, which varies with crop type, are the main factors in harboring different types of microbial communities. This might also lead to the high abundance of Basidiomycota in rice-based scenarios and Zygomycota in maize-based scenarios. The type of crop, size, and type of residue and tillage practices vary in different management systems leading to variation in soil moisture also. Chytridiomycota are reported in aquatic ecosystems as well as in terrestrial ecosystems (Gleason et al., 2004), but in our study, these were found in different management systems and favored in maize-based scenarios. Not only residue type and decomposition duration but also variation in moisture played an important role in deciding the abundance of different groups of fungi (Miura et al., 2015). Sordariomycetes and Eurotiomycetes were among the dominating classes in all the scenarios, which were previously reported in soils of conservation agricultural practices (Wang et al., 2016;Choudhary et al., 2018b). Sordariomycetes is one of the largest classes of Ascomycota, which includes pathogens, endophytes, and saprobes. Members of the Sordariomycetes are ubiquitous and cosmopolitan. Saprobic Sordariomycetes have the potential to produce cellulolytic enzymes, and its member Chaetomium is a well-known cellulolytic organism responsible for the destruction of paper and fabrics (Zhang et al., 2006). Members of Sordariomycetes class play an important role in the decomposition and nutrient cycling of plant residues. Dothideomycetes also represents one of the largest and dominant classes of the phylum Ascomycota, which is mostly found as endophytes or saprobes (Kirk et al., 2008). Members of this class can cause disease in almost every crop plant including maize and rice (Goodwin, 2013). Members of this class are also known to degrade cellulose and other complex carbohydrates of dead or partially digested plant organic matter (Hyde et al., 2013). One unidentified class of Ascomycota is also among the most dominating classes found in scenarios. Although its identification is not known to class level, these unidentified and unknown fungal groups may be important to community compositions. Many of these previously unknown groups are later found as major components of communities of interest (Rosling et al., 2011). The abundance of some classes found to be high in maize-based scenarios can be correlated with the difference in crop type, root system, and residue depending on plant species, and biochemical characteristics of plant materials differ considerably (Xu et al., 2006). The effect of tillage practices on the abundance of fungi was observed at both phyla and class levels. Some phyla and classes were found higher in ZT, which indicates that the hyphal network in CT practices got disturbed due to intensive tillage practices, which resulted in limited growth. Whereas, the abundance of some phyla/classes was reported higher in CT than ZT, which might be due to the higher growth rate of broken mycelia of these phyla/classes under CT than that in other management practices. Wang et al. (2017) of fungal communities with more stable communities under ZT conditions. Irrigation management and soil moisture had a great impact on fungal communities in arid and semi-arid areas where water availability is limited (Vargas-Gastélum et al., 2015;Deng et al., 2022). But in our study, irrigation was given to all the scenarios based on the tensiometer to maintain the soil moisture as per crop requirement to minimize the effect of irrigation management on fungal community composition. Crop residue retention enriches soils with a significant amount of nutrients (Jat et al., 2018(Jat et al., , 2019b;;Lohan et al., 2018). It is a major reason behind high SOC, N, P, and K contents in residue retention scenarios. Moreover, under zero tillage practices, the decomposition of residue also does not disturb due to the non-disturbance of soil. Residue not only harbors different types of microfauna but also provides nutrients to them, which in turn release different types of enzymes such as phosphatase, glucosidase, dehydrogenase, etc., responsible for the conversion of unavailable to the available forms of nutrients (Maguire et al., 2020). The activity of different enzymes is reported to be more in CA/CSA-based practices and have a higher soil quality index over farmers' practices (Choudhary et al., 2018c,d). CA practices not only improve nutrient availability but also improve overall soil quality (Jat et al., 2021a). It was observed by many researchers that tillage and residue had a positive effect on bulk density (Gathala et al., 2011). In farmers' practice, the residue is either burnt or removed, which resulted in more compactness in soils. Lower BD in the rice-based system as compared to maize-based CA scenarios might be due to higher conversion of crop residue carbon to SOC leading to good soil structure as evidenced through higher WSA and MWD (Mandal et al., 2007).The results clearly showed the differential benefits of CSAbased management practices in both rice-and maize-based systems. The highest wheat and systems yield (rice equivalent yield basis) were recorded with all CSA-based scenarios. Tillage and cropping systems, crop residue management, soil type, and climate control the magnitude at which SOC affects crop yields (Blanco-Canqui et al., 2013). About 0.1% increase in SOC concentration enhanced wheat yield by 0.04 Mg ha −1 at 0 kg N ha −1 (Blanco-Canqui et al., 2012). A direct relationship between SOM stocks and crop productivity was observed by Oldfield et al. (2018) through variables for soils and amendments. In a global meta-analysis, zero tillage (ZT) when combined with residue retention and crop rotation can produce equivalent or greater yields than conventional tillage, by minimizing its negative impacts. Higher system productivity in CSA-based scenarios might be due to the integration of mungbean (Gathala et al., 2013), less terminal heat effects on the wheat crop (Gathala et al., 2013;Sharma et al., 2015), higher carbon mineralization (Kirk et al., 2008;Datta et al., 2019) with better nutrient availability (Sasse et al., 2018), and improved soil biological properties (Olsen et al., 1954;Choudhary et al., 2018b,d).Some classes are negatively correlated while some are positively correlated with each other, and it is due to the ecological relationship between them, which may influence each other's position in the community. The groups, which have similar modes of nutrition, compete for the same biochemical fraction of the crop residues, and this might show a negative correlation. Biochemical qualities of residue are the main drivers in the composition of fungal communities. Specific function during the decomposition of residue linked to specific taxa (Rezgui et al., 2021). In residue decomposition, the end product of one class/group may be acted as food for another group. In such a situation, these may be positively correlated as they do not have competition for food. Due to the preferences of microbes for specific residue compounds, organic matter decomposition and transformation under different agricultural managements influence the abundances of the specific microbial taxa (Zheng et al., 2022). Different type of residue management over the years strongly influences the soil's microbial, chemical, and physical properties. In this 9-year-old experiment, the residue is accumulated over the years in all CSA scenarios, and according to Fontaine et al. (2011), the soil microbes can decompose old recalcitrant soil organic matter by using fresh carbon as a source of energy, which can lead to a different type of distribution of soil fungal taxa in these scenarios. A significant positive correlation between SOC and MWD and WSA was due to good soil structure rendered by higher SOC in CAbased scenarios. Higher MWD and WSA were found under crop residue retention scenarios in cereal systems (Jat et al., 2019a). There is a strong link between microbial communities and SOC (Zheng et al., 2022), which is influenced by the different tillage and crop establishment practices. ZT improved C fractions over CT and these C pools can directly impact the activities of microbes in soils (Rakesh et al., 2021). Soil properties and soil fungal communities also showed different types and magnitudes of relationships because of robust associations between them (Yang et al., 2017). Both the diversity and composition of the fungi community directly correlated with the soil properties and indirectly correlated with management practices (Li and Zhang, 2022).Agricultural practices in isolation do not prove good for soil and crop sustainability in cereal systems. Crop management practices, such as tillage, residue management, nutrient, water management, and crop diversification have a strong influence on the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil. Therefore, the combination of different management practices led to differences in fungal community composition and soil chemical properties under climate-smart agriculture (CSA) systems. Maize-based scenarios are more diverse in terms of fungal communities than rice-based CSA scenarios. Rice-based scenarios with CSA practices showed a more abundance of Ascomycota phyla over the maize-based CSA scenarios. Ascomycota is followed by Basidiomycota in rice-based scenarios and Zygomycota in maize-based scenarios.CSA-based scenarios improved the soil chemical properties (organic carbon, nitrogen, and potassium) across the different cereal-based CSA scenarios compared with other scenarios (CT and partial CSA). Soil physical properties such as bulk density, mean weight diameter, and water-stable aggregate were also improved under CSA scenarios. Improved soil properties under CSA-based practices resulted in improved crop and system yield. Results indicate that the bundling/layering of smart agricultural practices not only influences the soil properties but also played an important role in deciding the microbial community composition.","tokenCount":"5345"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1365714704.json b/data/part_2/1365714704.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..48fcbc814a86c5ed6be7018096acb2296d268b50 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1365714704.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"25f014053f7e0bc5296b540cd9bfbac0","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/562c4ac2-d57e-408c-9057-1f25f71f46a1/retrieve","id":"609138130"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"5100e95c-a3c3-4d72-82f8-2ef6cd6adcc6","pagecount":"5","content":"AKADEMIYA 014 Maize Grain Price trends in food surplus and defi cit areas of Zambia under the COVID-19 PandemicMaize is Zambia's main staple and it is most consumed and produced food at national level. Maize accounts for over 70% of food availability and meets 60% human consumption requirements (FEWS Net, 2017). It is signifi cant to note that Zambia has over the years been a surplus producer of maize (at both national and regional level). Eastern and Central Provinces are the main producers of maize, whilst the major defi cit areas include the urban (highly populated), high-consumption centres of Lusaka and Copperbelt Provinces. The majority of maize producers in Zambia are small-scale farmers under rain-fed conditions. Within Zambia, both formal and informal market networks of maize grain trade coexist; however, they have separate well-defi ned market chains albeit well integrated (FEWS Net, 2017).The subsequent analysis in this bulletin examines the maize grain price trends (for the period of January, 2019 to June, 2020) for surplus and defi cit provinces, as highlighted. The goal is to help determine whether the maize grain prices within Zambia were infl uenced by the eff ects of the COVID-19 Pandemic and in which way.The pandemic is likely to be more disruptive to local food markets and thus have more serious eff ects on the poorest and most vulnerable groups and communities than any of the crises in recent years. This is because the poor and vulnerable are aff ected by changes in local food staple prices signifi cantly more than other population groups, not only because of more limited purchasing power but also because of diff erences in consumption baskets. Moreover, domestic markets for local food staples such as yam, cassava, white maize, cowpeas, millet or sorghum tend to behave diff erently during times of crisis than global markets for major commodities such as rice, wheat or yellow maize. For instance, the last global food price crisis had much more signifi cant impacts on the latter group of food commodities. Local food staples markets tend to be rather segmented from global food markets. Staple food prices therefore tend to be isolated from global market shocks. The diff erence with Covid is that the disruption of food supply chains has hit both domestic and global food markets rather badly.The global nature and complex ramifi cations of the pandemic make it impossible to avoid the pain from rising food prices, in particular among vulnerable groups. Diff erent staples weigh diff erently in local diets. Diff erent communities are aff ected diff erently by changes in prices of diff erent staples. Some markets are more connected than others and therefore price changes for the same staple food vary across geography and over time. Consequently, a good understanding of how local staples markets behave and close tracking of changes in food prices at community level have to be key elements of any strategy to protect livelihoods. AKADEMIYA2063 scientists and their partners are working to ensure that governments and other national stakeholders have suffi cient information to plan and respond to the eff ects of the pandemic on local markets. Maize grain marketing system, trade flows and pricing in Zambia are much more complex when compared to the other staples due to the high consumption rate of maize across the country. Further complications on the marketing system emanate from the high level of government interventions on maize markets. Maize prices in the country can vary due to the fact that in as much as maize is the main staple, there are other competing staples i.e. cassava, wheat and rice. Cassava is the second highest consumed staple food, with high consumption in the northern and western parts of the country but low consumption in the central, eastern and southern parts of the country. This implies that maize and cassava can be substitutes in some parts of the country i.e. Northern and North Western Provinces. However, as earlier mentioned, some parts of the country have preference of one over the other; the \"cassava belt\"-Northern Province prefer cassava and the \"maize belt\"-Central, Eastern and Southern Provinces prefer maize (Tembo et al., 2010).Figure 1 presents the average maize prices in both surplus provinces and the deficit provinces; the average maize prices in the deficit provinces were slightly higher (averaging ZMW65/Kg) than those in the surplus provinces (averaging ZMW59/Kg) over the study (January 2019 -June 2020). However, while prices steadily increased throughout 2019, they dropped significantly after February 2020 in both surplus and deficit areas. This decrease of prices from February and March 2020 indicates the influence of COVID-19 related market restraints and interventions which resulted in reduced demand for maize. The drop in prices was more pronounced in the surplus provinces than in the deficit provinces. In general, maize trade flows in the country are from the surplus provinces (Central and Eastern Province) to the urban highly-populated centres of Lusaka and Copperbelt Provinces as well as abroad into neighbouring countries (FEWS Net, 2017). It is likely that the restrictions on movements led to more excess supply of maize in surplus areas than in deficit areas leading to a reduction in prices.In Zambia, the marketing of maize is dominated by the main value chain actors -producers, traders, millers, the government (Food Reserve Agency), and consumers. The largest purchaser of maize grain is the Food Reserve Agency (FRA), followed by private sector actors (such as NWK Agri services, AFGRI Corporation, Zdenakie, CHC Commodities; other large traders such as Aliboo, Shifa and Kavulamungu; medium-scale traders, and a myriad of informal small-scale traders (also referred to as aggregators). The fact that all of these players were faced with restrictions on their activities during the Covid-19 period led to disruptions of on both the demand and supply side of the maize market.Eastern and Central Provinces possess fertile soils suitable for production of major crops including maize, with rainfall ranging between 800 -1000mm (Chapoto et al., 2018). Over time, there has been constant expansion in the area under maize production, which has in turn led to an increase in maize surpluses. High levels of production in Eastern province result in equally high maize availability, leading to comparatively lower prices of maize than in the Central Province (as depicted in Figure 2).The main maize marketing period in Zambia lasts from May to November (the peak between June and August). Notably, the prices in both provinces steadily increased throughout 2019 due to the fact that the country was experiencing increasing consumer price inflation (averaging 9.8% in 2019); roughly 3% higher than the previous two years (Zambia Central Bank, 2020). The upward trends in process stopped abruptly after March 2020, when the prices markedly fell to ZMW56/Kg and ZMW49/Kg in Central and Eastern Provinces, from ZMW100/Kg and ZMW92/Kg, respectively. This is also the time when the first Covid-19 cases were reported in Zambia. On the 17th of March, the Government of Zambia shut down all educational institutions and thereafter put in place restrictions on travels. The restriction of Lusaka and Copperbelt Provinces are the largest maize consumption centres in Zambia; they also exhibit low areas of maize production due to high population densities. As noted from Figure 3 ). The restrictions on people's movement dampened the demand for maize, hence the drop in prices after February 2020. The prices continued their downward trends in both provinces.Figure 4 compares the price changes in 2020 with prices changes in 2019 over the same period of six months from January to June in order to confirm whether the observed changes in 2020 were unique and different from usual patterns. The analysis focuses on the same categories of markets (surplus and deficit areas) for ease of comparison. The expectation under normal circumstances is that there should not be conspicuous differences between month-to-month price differences in 2020 and month-to-month price differences in 2019. However, with on the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the prices spiked in both provinces , implying that the prices were significantly higher in March 2020 than those observed in March 2019. The same phenomenon was observed in June. Prices fell drastically in both April and May 2020, due to the market closures and movement restrictions despite the commencement of the harvesting season, much in line with the earlier finding of falling prices in surplus area markets.Maize prices in 2020 have shown significant decline when compared to 2019 from the months of March to June. Comparatively, Lusaka recorded stronger negative price changes as compared to Copperbelt and showed more volatility in prices than its counterpart especially from March to June 2020. Again, a combination of the onset of harvesting season and reduced demand due to Covid-19 restrictions led to the observed price decline in 2020.The travel restrictions imposed by the Government of Zambia in March 2020 had a bearing on constraining maize grain trade flows within and outside the country. The restrictions depressed the demand for maize in and outside the country hence the notable decrease in prices during this aforementioned period.The travel restrictions and closure of public markets by the Government may have affected the business of small aggregators mainly located in rural communities. The massive price fall after March 2020 in both the surplus and deficit provinces may also imply that small aggregators were in a worse off position.To limit impacts from similar pandemics in future, the Government should consider enacting the policies that would enhance trade (enforcing personal protective equipment regulations) rather than imposing a full lock down (closure of markets), which The Expertise We Need. The Africa We Want.adversely affects food supply and prices. Thereafter government should engage in consultation with market players and neighbouring countries to allow trans-border trade flows. This would decrease the oversupply of maize in the local markets and also stabilise the local prices of maize.","tokenCount":"1629"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1365728134.json b/data/part_2/1365728134.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5f3c5c00ac8bc77188aa3f67d278d8541601a84c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1365728134.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"eddf858ec6a6e377b11df216e8cc8fc5","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/9120c62d-f0e2-47ec-83b4-758602f041eb/retrieve","id":"349402821"},"keywords":["heat-tolerant maize hybrid","willingness to pay","contingent valuation","preference heterogeneity","Nepal"],"sieverID":"c08e2869-ae6e-47e2-98f7-aa6abba1c704","pagecount":"18","content":"High atmospheric temperatures can reduce maize production in different parts of Asia. Heat stress is the major driving force behind the need for varietal development that confers a heat tolerance trait (drought + heat tolerant) to maize hybrids. CIMMYT has developed heat-tolerant maize hybrids and deployed them in the market in collaboration with NARS partners. This study was conducted to estimate farmers' willingness to pay for heat-tolerant maize hybrids in the Terai region of Nepal. A socioeconomic survey of 404 randomly selected maize-growing households was conducted to estimate farmers' willingness to pay using the contingent valuation method. Given the economic importance of heat-tolerant maize hybrids in maize cultivation, the survey showed that the average WTP for heat-tolerant maize hybrids was 71% more than that for the current varieties in the market, including overall seed sources and subsidized seed. Without a subsidy, the farmers' WTP price was at a 19% premium compared to the average price paid for conventional hybrids. Factors such as education, owning land, the interaction of hybrid adopters and owning land, soil depth, the number of goats/sheep, and the semi-pucca homes of households influenced the WTP for heat-tolerant maize hybrids. Heterogeneous demand was observed with respect to years of hybrid maize cultivation, farmers' association with the network group, and the gender of the head of the household. In the context of climate change and global warming scenarios, Nepal's agriculture policy should prioritize increasing domestic seed production and the distribution of heat-tolerant maize hybrids through a public-private partnership model.Population and industrial growth are the major drivers behind the global demand for rice, wheat, and maize-the world's major food staples. The world's population grew at a rate of 1.05% in 2020, with the current average increase estimated at 81 million people per year. An additional 1.2 billion people will need food by the year 2037 [1]. Optimal climatic conditions and packages of practices determine productivity in agriculture. However, climate change poses a major challenge to increasing productivity and sustaining livelihoods in the face of erratic weather patterns and scarcity of irrigation water. Drought, heat stress, and long dry periods are currently the leading causes of yield losses in South Asia, reducing crop yields by 15-20% on average in rainfed agriculture [2]. Climate-changeinduced heat and water stresses are projected to drastically reduce the yields of staple crops in the region by 9-19% in maize, 44-49% in wheat, and 14% in rice [3]. While drought negatively affects all stages of crop growth and development, the reproductive stage, particularly between tassel emergence and early grain filling, is most sensitive to drought stress [4]. A study [5] hinted that in sub-Saharan Africa a 2 • C increase in temperature would result in a greater yield loss than a 20% decrease in precipitation. Warming across South Asian countries during the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries has resulted in more frequent temperature extremes [6][7][8]. Heatwave frequency has increased since the mid-twentieth century in large parts of Asia [8]. The extent of heat-stressed areas in South Asia is projected to increase by up to 12% by 2030 and by 21% by 2050 with respect to the baseline [9]. Climate-smart technologies such as heat-tolerant hybrids (heat, drought, and heat + drought) are the best option to minimize the impacts of abiotic stresses.In the 2008-2009 drought in Nepal, power outages lasted 16 h per day in Kathmandu, increasing yield losses in wheat and barley, leading to food insecurity for two million people [10]. Climate change studies conducted in the twentieth century projected that there would be water stress in most of South Asia by the year 2050 [11][12][13]. The average temperature is predicted to rise significantly by 0.5 • C to 2.0 • C by 2030 [14], by 1.3 • C to 3.8 • C by 2060, and by 1.8 • C to 5.8 • C by 2090 [15]. High temperatures during critical stages of crop growth, long dry spells, and high precipitation pose a risk of increased food insecurity in marginal maize-growing areas. Past experience has shown that the use of new varieties alongside improved management practices can offset yield losses by up to 40% [16]. Developing a maize germplasm with drought and heat tolerance is seen as the right step toward risk mitigation in hotter and drier production environments. The drought tolerance trait in maize has global value, without which no farmer can afford it [17,18], given the climate change scenario. The current rate of water use is not sustainable if the world is to support 9 billion people or more in 2050 [19].The International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), together with its national partners, has developed climate-smart technologies such as drought-and heat-tolerant maize hybrids (Rampur Hybrid-10 (RH-10) and Rampur Hybrid-8 (RH-8)) to minimize the effects of climate change. The adoption of these improved hybrids is governed by farmers' willingness to pay for their traits. The best way to assess the effective demand for drought-and heat-tolerant traits is to quantify the implicit price of the desired traits. This study was designed to estimate the farmers' WTP for such traits and facilitate the scaling of drought-and heat-tolerant maize technology in the Terai region of Nepal.Nepal is a topographically diverse country, with mountains covering 35%, hills covering 42%, and the Terai region covering 23% of its total area. Given the country's extreme topography, only 21% of its total land area is suitable for agriculture. Of the total agricultural land, 29.7% is irrigated [20]. Nepal's principal economic activity is agriculture, which contributed 30.7% of its GDP in 2019-2020. Maize is the second most important cereal crop grown for food, feed, and fodder [21], which showed an increase in production of 0.279 million tons and a 0.37% increase in area (3492 ha) in 2019-2020 compared to the 2017-2018 production of 2.56 million tons from a 0.95-million-hectare area [22]. In the 2020/2021 fiscal year area, production, and productivity were estimated to have increased by 0.21%, 3.22%, and 3%, respectively, compared to 2019/2020 [23]. Maize provides livelihoods (income and employment) to around 1.5 million people [24]. The per capita maize consumption in Nepal was 98 g/person/day [25]. Demand for the crop has grown by about 5% per year over the last few decades [26]. About 16.42% of the maize is grown in the Terai and inner Terai regions [27]. The crop contributes 25.4% of the total edible production in the country [28]. Nonetheless, 51.8% and 25.2% of households in the country are food insecure and under the poverty line, respectively [29].Of the total area under maize in Nepal, summer maize contributes 73.9%, spring maize contributes 14.2%, and winter maize contributes 11.9% [23]. Around 88% of the maize area (summer-and spring-grown) is susceptible to heat stress at both the vegetative and reproductive stages, particularly during pollination and grain setting. Yield losses of up to 75% have been reported due to heat stress [30], depending on crop stage, severity, and duration of stress [31]. High temperatures above 38 • C at the time of silking and anthesis have led to leaf firing and tassel blast, which led to poor pollination and barren ears, resulting in yield loss.Shallow tube wells are the major source of irrigation in Banke district. Most farmers with shallow tube wells used 0.5 hp motors to irrigate their maize fields, making it a time-consuming process. Decreasing water levels in the summer season are a major cause of unequal water distribution and insufficient irrigation.According to an estimate, only 12-15% of the maize area in Nepal is under hybrid cultivation, and 85-88% is under open-pollinated varieties (OPV)s [32], a major cause of low productivity. The demand for feed has been increasing at the rate of 11% per year [33]. The demand for poultry feed is estimated to be 391,538 metric tons, with 75% of this amount fulfilled through imports. Over a 20-year period (1994/1995 to 2014/2015), the country's livestock population increased by 0.73 to 1.23% annually [34].Considering maize's diverse uses, demand for it will keep growing. To meet the internal demand, Nepal imported 0.4 million tons, valued at USD 115.94 million, in 2019-2020. Since Nepal's national hybrid seed system is in the early stages of development, the country relies heavily on imported hybrid maize seeds, whose demand expanded from 20 tons in 2008 [35] to 27,754 tons in 2019-2020 [22]. These imports created a trade deficit of USD 9.7 million from the maize seed sector alone.Open-pollinated varieties have some limitations in terms of yield potential. Their yields cannot be increased beyond a point, even with high inputs. On the contrary, a hybrid can give 25-30% higher grain yield compared to OPVs [23]. However, the limited choice of hybrids, poor access to improved seeds of released or registered hybrids developed by the national system, and the high seed price of imported hybrid seeds could be some reasons for the low adoption of hybrid seeds. Research in hybrid maize in Nepal started in 1987 to increase production and productivity. Since then, the country has released 29 OPVs and 10 hybrids (years in parentheses): Gaurav (2003), Rampur Hybrid-2 (2012), Khumal Hybrid-2 (2014), Rampur Hybrid-4 (2016), Rampur Hybrid-6 (2016), Rampur Hybrid-8 (2018), Rampur Hybrid-10 (2018), Rampur Hybrid-12, Rampur Hybrid-14, and Rampur Hybrid-16 (2022). Of these, Rampur Hybrid-8, Rampur Hybrid-10, and Rampur Hybrid-12 are heat-tolerant single-cross hybrids developed under the HTMA/CIMMYT project funded by USAID. Along with these, multinational companies developed 53 hybrids registered for marketing in the country [23].This study is based on primary household surveys conducted in the Banke and Dang districts in the Terai region of Nepal in August 2021. Face-to-face interviews with household heads were conducted, and data were collected using a structured questionnaire that was designed using an electronic software (Kobo collect toolbox, v2021. 2.4) to minimize data entry errors and survey time. The districts were selected purposively on the basis of the deployment of Rampur Hybrid-10 by seed companies in the maize super zone, large maize areas under cultivation, and spring maize areas and the potential for the adoption of a heat-tolerant maize hybrid in Nepal. The location of the study districts is shown in Figure 1. The total area under maize in Dang district was 26,250 ha, with 75,081 tons of production, whereas the corresponding figures for Banke district were 9336 ha and 25,913 tons in 2019-2020 [22].1 The total population of both surveyed districts was 1,043,896 (Dang: 552,583 [36] and Banke: 491,313) [36], as per the 2011 census of Nepal. The sample size (n) of 400 was estimated using the formula by Yamane [37], as shown in Equation (1).where N = total population and n = sample size.As RH-10 is a recently released hybrid, the seed was distributed through the super zone for maize and co-operative societies. A list of adopters was collected from the super zone and co-operative societies to select adopters. A list of maize farmers was collected from rural municipalities to randomly select non-adopter farmers. Based on the deployment of seed in the super zone for maize, Rapti, Gadawa, and Rajpur rural municipalities and Lamahi municipality were purposively selected from Dang district, and Khajura and Duduwa rural municipalities were selected from Banke district. In total, 25 villages were selected: 6, 5, 1, and 4 from Rapti, Gadawa, Rajpur, and Lamahi municipalities, respectively, and 1 and 8 from Duduwa and Khajura municipalities, respectively. From each village, 16-18 farmers (8-9 adopters and 8-9 non-adopters) were randomly selected from the list. Of the total surveyed households, 192 farmers had adopted the heat-tolerant maize hybrid Rampur Hybrid-10 and 212 were growers of conventional maize varieties. Among the farmers, 357 were adopters of the maize hybrid and 47 were growers of OPVs or local varieties. Finally, a pool of 404 households (258 in Dang and 146 in Banke) was randomly selected for the survey to ascertain farmers' WTP for Rampur Hybrid-10, which is a heat-tolerant maize hybrid.The contingent valuation method originally developed in environmental and natural resource economics was employed to elicit farmers' demand for heat-tolerant maize hybrids [38]. The WTP can be estimated either using open-ended questions, such as asking respondents the maximum amount they are willing to pay, or through closed-ended questions, such as if they would be willing to pay a specific amount (dichotomous choice). This study used the dichotomous choice (DC) approach, which is generally superior to an open-ended format, as it confronts respondents with a more market-like situation [39]. In the single-bound model, farmers can provide a \"yes\" or \"no\" response to the initial bid offered for the technology. This approach is incentive-compatible; it is in the strategic interest of respondents to say \"yes\" if their WTP is greater than or equal to the price asked and \"no\" otherwise [38]. Utility maximization implies that respondents will only answer \"yes\" to the offered bid if their maximum WTP is greater than the bid. However, the single-bounded model requires a large sample and is statistically inefficient [40]. Greater efficiency is achieved in the double-bound model by offering respondents a second bid that is higher or lower, depending on the first response. This method incorporates more information about an individual's WTP and therefore provides more efficient estimates and tighter confidence intervals [40]. The double-bounded model is easy to administer, and the model can be estimated with standard econometric software, so we used a double-bounded model in our study.In the DC approach, the consumer is presented with two consecutive bids, and the second bid depends on the response to the first. If the consumer answers \"yes\" to the first bid (B i ), the second bid (B i u ) is set higher, but if the individual responds \"no\" to the first bid, the second bid (B i d ) is set lower. There are four possible outcomes: \"yes\" to the first bid followed by a \"yes\" to the second bid (with a probability denoted by P yy ); \"yes\" followed by \"no\" (P yn ); \"no\" followed by \"yes\" (P ny ); and two consecutive \"no\" answers (P nn ). The price bids varied randomly across the questionnaire, ranging from Nepalese rupee (NPR) 300/kg to NPR 700/kg based on the seed prices of different brands and seed subsidies provided by the Nepalese government. The format of the WTP questionnaire is given in Appendix A. To obtain information on a wide range of values, different bid amounts were randomly assigned between respondents (i). Combining the probabilities of the four outcomes, the log-likelihood function for this model for a sample of n consumers takes the form:where B i is the initial bid; B u is the follow-up bid; B d is the lower bid; and di YY , di YN , di NN , and di NY are binary variables, with 1 denoting the occurrence of that particular outcome and 0 otherwise. The parameter σ is the standard error of the regression, which captures the randomness in the bid function. The estimation coefficient (β) can be directly interpreted as the marginal effect of the variable x on WTP. The mean WTP was obtained by evaluating the estimated coefficient at the variables' mean values.A multilocation evaluation trial (MLT) of Rampur Hybrid-10 on a 10 m 2 plot with other hybrid cultivars as checks was conducted by CIMMYT to compare their performance in the 2017-2018 spring season (Table 1). The potential grain yields per plot of all the hybrids were recorded and converted to tons/ha at a standard moisture of 12.5%. The trials were conducted under high input and stressful environmental (spring season) conditions. The minimum yield was 4.52 t/ha in Bittipara, and the maximum was 8.25 t/ha in Nepalgunj I. In Bittipara, the performance of Rampur Hybrid-10 was significantly superior to that of commercial check 1 and on par with those of the other checks. In Sherpur, Rampur Hybrid-10 performed significantly better than the regional check, commercial check 1, and commercial check 2 and on par with commercial check 3. In Nepalgunj I and II, Rampur Hybrid-10 s performance was superior to those of the regional check and commercial check 1 and on par with those of the other checks. Among the trials in the six locations, Rampur Hybrid-10 s performance was superior to the regional or commercial checks in four locations and on par with them in two locations in the spring season. High temperatures/heat waves coinciding with the flowering/reproductive stage adversely affected pollen viability and stigma receptivity, leading to abnormal fertilization and resulting in poor grain setting. Given that uncertain climatic conditions and the probability of long dry spells and high temperatures/heat are higher in rainfed agriculture, the adoption of a heat-tolerant hybrid is a strategic way to minimize yield losses that occur due to heat stress. The socioeconomic profile of the sampled households is presented in Table 2. Of the surveyed households, 92% were male-headed. The average age of the household heads was 50.53 years. Most of the respondents (58.42%) were aged between 41 and 60 years, followed by 21.29% being less than 40 years old and 20.23% being more than 61 years old. Significant differences were observed among adopters and non-adopters of the heattolerant hybrid. The education status of the household head was found to be at a secondary level. Adivasi/Janajati respondents constituted 58% of the sample households, whereas 30% of them were Brahmin/Chhatri. About 86% of the households were members of social networks such as agricultural co-operative societies and self-help groups, which allowed them direct access to schemes/programs implemented by the Nepal government to promote cutting-edge technology. The average size of the owned land was 0.92 ha. About 73.27% of the households had land holdings that were below 1 ha, 19.55% had land holdings between 1.01 ha and 2 ha, 4.95% had land holdings between 2.1 ha and 4 ha, and only 2.23% had had land holdings of more than 4.1 ha. The per capita land holding size was only 0.15 ha. Of their own land, 0.27 ha was allocated to maize cultivation. Given the open border between India and Nepal, farmers in adjoining districts have been cultivating hybrid maize since 1980. On average, farmers have been cultivating hybrid maize for the last 3.5 years in the study locations. The mass adoption of hybrid maize varieties began 5-6 years ago in Dang district and in the last 2-3 years in Bankej district. Significant differences were observed among adopters and non-adopters of heat-tolerant hybrids in terms of the distances to input dealers and extension offices. The Nepalese government has been promoting different schemes to promote the swift adoption of hybrid maize. Agriculture remains the major source of occupation, providing employment to 77.48% of the households in the study location. Low land size and over-dependency on agriculture has led to outmigration. Of the surveyed households, 207 members (0.51%) had outmigrated from 158 households (39%). Of the total number that had migrated, 51.21% had migrated within Nepal, 32.85% had migrated to other countries (Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Dubai, etc.), and 15.94% were taking part in seasonal migration to India. The major reported reasons for migration included low per capita land holding, the non-availability of employment in the village, and greater possible earnings outside Nepal than within the country, among other factors. Off-farm income was calculated by taking into account salary, business, machinery earnings, migration, and other sources and was estimated to be NPR 254,740/year. Income from remittance was not considered to calculate off-farm income. A buffalo and 4-5 sheep/goats were held by each household. The average soil depth in an adopter farmer's maize plot was 32.41 cm, significantly different from that in a non-adopter's plot (30.75 cm). About 59% of the households grew maize in the spring season, whereas 36% grew it in the winter season, indicating their clear preference for spring season cultivation. As a result of income received from remittances and migration income, 70% of the households had pucca houses on their own farm and 18% had semi-pucca houses, of which 23% of households adopted a new hybrid while 14% grew conventional maize varieties.The detailed cost of maize cultivation by farmers is given in Table 3. The average paidout cost was NPR 38,170/ha; adopter households had a significantly (at the 5% level) lower paid-out cost of NPR 36,060/ha than the non-adopters, with NPR 40,090/ha. The significant difference in paid-out cost was because of the seed cost. A detailed breakdown of the cost of cultivating maize is given in the Supplementary Materials (Table S1). The average seed rate used by farmers was 22.59 kg, which cost around NPR 7350/ha. Adopter farmers reported an average seed cost of NPR 5370 of Rampur Hybrid-10, which was significantly lower (at the 1% level), by NPR 3790, than that reported by non-adopters, with a seed cost of NPR 9150/ha. Hybrid seed is subsidized by 50% if purchased from the government's Prime Minister Agriculture Modernization Project (PMAMP) maize super zone, whereas there is no subsidy if purchased from dealers. Rampur Hybrid-10 is produced and marketed by private seed companies in Nepal, and other conventional maize hybrids are imported from neighboring countries such as India, which includes the cost of transportation, import taxes, and storage charges, which increase the seed cost. In-country (Nepal) hybrid seed production, which reduces over-dependency on other countries and boosts the local seed industry, has been one of the major achievements of the HTMA project funded by USAID. Agricultural universities recommend fertilizer application for maize at 180:60:60 NPK/ha, which requires them to apply 340 kg of urea/ha, 130 kg of DAP/ha and 67 kg of potash/ha. Farmers, on the other hand, used very little fertilizer, which could be one of the reasons for low productivity. There is a scope for the use of optimal fertilizer doses to increase productivity per unit area. Very few farmers use micronutrients or weedicides. The total cost, including family labor, was estimated to be NPR 77,390/ha. Most of the farm work was being performed by family members, as the average family size was 6.86 members. Hence, expenses for hired labor were very low. A study in 2022 [35] estimated that the total variable cost of hybrid maize adopters was NPR 74,299/ha, which is similar to our findings. Households that adopted Rampur Hybrid-10 reported an additional yield of 0.36 tons/ha and an additional net income of NPR 13,720/ha compared to conventional maize growers. Studies revealed that stress-tolerant varieties provide higher and stable yields during dry spells and serve as a risk management strategy in the absence of institutional insurance mechanisms [42][43][44]. The initial bids offered to the surveyed farmers are given in Table 4. The bids ranged from NPR 300 to NPR 700 in NPR 50 intervals. Bids were decided following discussions with dealers and distributors and were based on the current prices of hybrids in the country's market. Of the surveyed farmers, 357 grew hybrid maize varieties and 47 farmers grew OPVs. Overall, 61% of the farmers were willing to adopt heat-tolerant maize hybrids at the given seed prices. While 65% of the adopters of maize hybrids were willing to adopt heat-tolerant maize hybrids, only 28% of the non-adopters (farmers growing OPVs) were willing to adopt heat-tolerant hybrids. Moreover, adopters of hybrid maize were willing to pay a greater price for heat-tolerant hybrids compared to non-adopters. It was observed that as the bid price increased, the willingness to adopt heat-tolerant hybrids decreased, indicating that the bid prices mentioned in the study suited the hybrid seed market in Nepal. Pearson's chi2 statistic for the association between the adoption of hybrid maize and the willingness (yes = 1) to adopt heat-tolerant hybrids was 24.25, which was statistically significant at p < 0.01.We estimated two WTP models. Model 1 consisted of socioeconomic characteristics, while model 2 included the interaction of hybrid adopters with their own land (log) and the interaction of household membership in a group with hybrid adopters (Table 5). The results from the two models were fairly consistent with respect to significance, except for hybrid adopters and interactions. It was observed that increasing the education level by one year played a positive role in influencing WTP for a heat-tolerant maize hybrid compared to illiterate farmers. In Kenya, Kimunji and Groote [45] observed that people with secondary schooling showed a significantly higher WTP for genetically modified food than those with either less or more education. In model 1, hybrid maize adopters were willing to pay a significantly higher price for heat-tolerant hybrids compared to those who grew OPVs. This was because hybrid adopters knew the comparative yield advantage of hybrids over OPVs and were therefore willing to pay a premium price for heat-tolerant maize hybrids. Model 2 showed that increasing owned land played a vital role in influencing the WTP for heat-tolerant hybrids. Farm size and education were shown to significantly influence the WTP for Bt eggplant in India [46]. The owned land/farm size results were similar to those in earlier studies showing that farm size is an important determinant of the adoption of the latest technologies in developing countries [47][48][49]. The interaction of hybrid adopters and owned land was significant but negatively influenced the WTP for heat-tolerant hybrids. This is clearly explained in Figure 2. Figure 2 shows the prediction of WTP for heat-tolerant hybrids among hybrid adopters and OPV farmers. If OPV farmers adopt heat-tolerant hybrids, their WTP increases with increasing land holdings, whereas the WTP of hybrid adopters is similar irrespective of land holding. This indicates that in order to promote heat-tolerant maize hybrids, extension agents should focus on OPV farmers rather than hybrid adopters. The interaction of member groups and hybrid adopters showed a positive association that did not significantly influence WTP.Livestock rearing is complementary to agriculture. Farmers feed maize grain as a concentrate to sheep/goats to increase their weight and obtain a better price. Farmers consider sheep/goats to be a liquid asset that can be sold in any emergency. The availability of stable feed and fodder in a stressful environment is made possible by the adoption of a heat-tolerant maize hybrid. A farmer with sheep/goats was significantly more willing to pay an additional price for a heat-tolerant variety compared to a farmer with no sheep/goats. Soil depth indicates the quality of soil and fertility. Farmers with plots with good soil depth/quality were willing to pay more for Rampur Hybrid-10 compared to maize growers with poor soil quality. Male farmers were mostly the decision makers on the type of variety to be grown (local/improved/hybrid) and the price to pay for it. The exposure of male farmers to extension sources was greater compared to women. As a result, more male workers in households were willing to pay a premium price for the heat-tolerant trait than female workers but with no significant difference. With respect to season, farmers growing maize in the spring season were significantly more WTP a premium price for heat-tolerant hybrids compared to those who grew winter-season maize. In the spring season, farmers planted maize after harvesting mustard or potatoes. Increased irrigation sources and facilities enable farmers to grow three crops in a year. Spring-and summer-season maize are more exposed to heat stress, with up to 75% yield losses reported due to heat stress [30]. It is projected that heat-tolerant maize varieties could minimize yield losses from current maize varieties by up to 36% and 93% in 2030 and by up to 33% and 86% in 2050 under rainfed and irrigated conditions, respectively [9]. The type of household positively and significantly influenced the WTP for heat-tolerant maize hybrids. Farmers living in semipucca homes were ready to pay the premium price compared to farmers in pucca houses. The major source of income of farmers in semi-pucca houses was agriculture, and for those in pucca houses, remittances and off-farm income contributed the major source of income. The mean WTP for heat-tolerant maize hybrids across land holdings and the type of variety grown is presented in Table 6. The results are based on the prediction from the A farmer with sheep/goats was significantly more willing to pay an additional price for a heat-tolerant variety compared to a farmer with no sheep/goats. Soil depth indicates the quality of soil and fertility. Farmers with plots with good soil depth/quality were willing to pay more for Rampur Hybrid-10 compared to maize growers with poor soil quality. Male farmers were mostly the decision makers on the type of variety to be grown (local/improved/hybrid) and the price to pay for it. The exposure of male farmers to extension sources was greater compared to women. As a result, more male workers in households were willing to pay a premium price for the heat-tolerant trait than female workers but with no significant difference. With respect to season, farmers growing maize in the spring season were significantly more WTP a premium price for heat-tolerant hybrids compared to those who grew winter-season maize. In the spring season, farmers planted maize after harvesting mustard or potatoes. Increased irrigation sources and facilities enable farmers to grow three crops in a year. Spring-and summer-season maize are more exposed to heat stress, with up to 75% yield losses reported due to heat stress [30]. It is projected that heat-tolerant maize varieties could minimize yield losses from current maize varieties by up to 36% and 93% in 2030 and by up to 33% and 86% in 2050 under rainfed and irrigated conditions, respectively [9]. The type of household positively and significantly influenced the WTP for heat-tolerant maize hybrids. Farmers living in semi-pucca homes were ready to pay the premium price compared to farmers in pucca houses. The major source of income of farmers in semi-pucca houses was agriculture, and for those in pucca houses, remittances and off-farm income contributed the major source of income.The mean WTP for heat-tolerant maize hybrids across land holdings and the type of variety grown is presented in Table 6. The results are based on the prediction from the WTP interval regression model, as specified in Table 5 (model 2). The result shows that the mean WTP for heat-tolerant maize hybrids was NPR 557.57/kg (USD 4.72), and this amount is 71.37% more than the current average seed cost of NPR 325.36 (USD 2.77)/kg, considering overall seed sources, including subsidized seed. The average price paid by farmers for maize seed without subsidy was NPR 470.06/kg. This means that without subsidies farmers are WTP an 18.62% premium for heat-tolerant varieties compared to the average seed price paid for another commercial hybrid. These results match those of a study [44] that found that consumer WTP was 13.8% higher than the average price of non-genetically modified (GM) maize meal. They are also in agreement with a study in Zimbabwe that found drought tolerance to be the most preferred trait among smallholder Zimbabwean farmers compared to other traits such as yield, cob size, and flint texture [50]. A study revealed that Ethiopian farmers have been willing to sacrifice 3.1 quintals/0.25 ha yield to have the drought tolerance trait in a variety [51]. The Nepalese government gives a 50% subsidy on national hybrid maize seeds to promote the adoption of heat-tolerant hybrid seeds among farmers. If farmers receive maize hybrid seed from their co-operatives, distributed through the Prime Minister Agriculture Modernization Project (PMAMP) and the Smart Krishi village project, they receive a 50% subsidy. The subsidized seed price of Rampur Hybrid-10 is NPR 236.52 (USD 2.00)/kg, whereas the price is NPR 405.15 (USD 3.43)/kg for other conventional hybrids that exist in the market. The seed price of Rampur Hybrid-10 is less because it is produced and marketed by Nepalese seed companies and transportation and storage costs are minimized, whereas the high seed price of a conventional hybrid is because it is imported from India and includes transportation, storage, and marketing costs. The price of Indian hybrid maize seed ranges from NPR 270 (USD 2.27) to NPR 800 (USD 6.77)/kg without the subsidy. Without considering the subsidy, farmers are willing to pay NPR 557.57 (USD 4.72)/kg for Rampur Hybrid-10. Farmers receive a good quality heat-tolerant maize hybrid with a reasonable seed price due to the advantage of seed being produced by local seed companies. In order to obtain good quality seed, farmers in Kenya were willing to pay a 15% premium, on average, for bags purchased directly from the seed company compared to mint condition bags purchased from local retailers [52]. Hybrid maize growers were WTP NPR 574.46/kg for heat-tolerant maize hybrids, whereas OPV farmers' WTP amounted to NPR 429.18/kg; the difference was statistically significant, and hybrid growers were WTP an NPR 144.28/kg premium for heat-tolerant maize hybrid. A significant difference was observed between the WTP among hybrid maize adopters and non-adopters (those growing OPVs/local varieties). As the land holding sizes of hybrid adopters increased, the WTP for heat-tolerant hybrids slightly decreased, whereas as land holding increased, the WTP of non-hybrid adopters increased (Table 6). Therefore, government extension agencies need to focus on promoting heat-tolerant maize hybrids among OPV maize farmers in order to deliver climate-smart agriculture technologies to them.The mean WTP for heat-tolerant maize hybrids across the years of cultivation and membership in farmers' networks is presented in Table 7. The result is based on the interval regression model in Table 5 (model 2). The results show that the mean WTP for farmers who did not have any experience in maize hybrid cultivation was NPR 429.17/kg. Farmers with 5 years of experience or less were willing to pay NPR 549.34/kg, which was 28% more than what farmers with no experience were willing to pay. Farmers with more than 5 years of experience were willing to pay NPR 595.55/kg, which was 8.41% more than what farmers with 1 to 5 years of maize hybrid cultivation were willing to pay and 38.77% more than what farmers with no experience were willing to pay. It is clear that there was a positive relationship between the WTP and experience in hybrid maize cultivation. Farmers affiliated with any network group were willing to pay 20.90% more than those not affiliated with any farmer group [39]. Farmers who were members of a co-operative society, farmers' club, or both were willing to pay 20.42%, 27.50%, and 29.15% more, respectively, than those not associated with any group. Finally, male-headed households were willing to pay 11.55% more than female-headed households.The demand curves for heat-tolerant maize varieties in relation to years of experience in hybrid maize cultivation is presented in Figure 3, and the demand curves in relation to their membership in farmers' network groups is presented in Figure 4. Overall, all demand curves were elastic. The demand curve with zero years of experience in hybrid maize cultivation and the demand curve of households that were not a member of any group were highly elastic compared to the other groups. Farmers with more years of hybrid maize cultivation had a higher demand for heat-tolerant varieties than those with few years of experience, and as the experience increased, the demand for heat-tolerant varieties increased. Farmers with membership in network groups had a higher demand curve than those who were not members. The Government of Nepal has been promoting activities to increase the adoption of hybrid maize in the Terai region and other regions of Nepal. Liberalizing the hybrid maize seed market in 2011 created an opportunity for regional seed companies to enter the Nepalese market and formally register their hybrids [35]. The results of the differential demand curves could be useful to the private sector in quantifying the potential market for heat-tolerant maize varieties in maize-growing regions. quantifying the potential market for heat-tolerant maize varieties in maize-growing regions. Temperature is a major environmental factor that determines maize's physiological development and yield. Extremely high and low temperatures coincide with critical stages of crop growth, such as the reproductive stage, with adverse effects on crop yield. The development of heat-tolerant maize varieties is needed to enhance the resilience of maize production under heat-stressed conditions. Global research institutions such as the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), in collaboration with national research stations such as the National Maize Research Station (NMRP, Nepal), developed heat-tolerant hybrids to address heat stress issues. In this context, the current study assessed smallholder farmers' WTP for heat-tolerant maize hybrids in the Terai region of Nepal. Our results show that education, owned land, the interaction of hybrid adopters and own land, the number of goats/sheep owned, and households living in semi-pucca homes influenced the WTP for heat-tolerant maize hybrids. Our results demonstrate that farmers' average WTP was 71% higher than the actual price of other conventional maize varieties, including all seed sources.The findings of this study show a heterogeneous demand for heat-tolerant maize varieties with respect to years of experience in hybrid maize cultivation, membership in networks, and the gender of the household head. We found that among farmers with more than 5 years of experience in hybrid maize cultivation, the WTP was 38% more than among farmers with no experience in hybrid maize cultivation or those who have cultivated OPVs and local varieties. This shows that farmers who adopt hybrid maize obtain a greater yield advantage compared to OPVs, which is the reason why they are willing to pay a premium price for heat-tolerant maize hybrids. In-country seed production of Rampur Hybrid-10 further enhanced the overall maize seed ecosystem in the country.Since OPVs cannot fulfil the increasing demand for maize, agriculture extension agencies and seed companies should target farmers growing OPV maize in their promotion of heat-tolerant maize hybrids.Imparting training on cultural practices in hybrid maize cultivation at the village level will speed up adoption.Increasing demand for hybrid maize seed among farmers and a shortage in the supply of domestic hybrid seed provide an opportunity for domestic seed companies to produce hybrid seed that not only increases production and productivity but also reduces import costs. 4.The Nepalese government is promoting the adoption of hybrid and heat-tolerant maize through different distribution and promotional schemes. The government could devise a policy wherein hybrid seed is subsidized only if it is produced by domestic seed companies, or it could give more incentives for locally produced hybrid seed instead of importing hybrid seed. 5.Involving 13 private seed companies in heat-tolerant maize hybrid seed production has been one of the biggest outcomes of the HTMA project and a great example of public-private partnership in the research, development, and deployment of new stress-resilient varieties in partner countries. Continuing the project collaboration with the National Maize Research Program (NMRP) under NARC and with private seed companies with the technical support of CIMMYT for the next five years could achieve excellence in breeding techniques and increase seed production per unit area in Nepal. 6.Strengthening backward and forward linkages for the commercialization of domestic maize hybrids through NMRP, in collaboration with PMAMP and other private partners, will enable domestic companies to invest in hybrid maize seed production for the sustainable development of the maize seed ecosystem. 7.Nepal's good network of co-operative societies can be used as outlets for the distribution of heat-tolerant hybrids directly from seed companies so that they are made available to farmers at a reasonable price.The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su15043068/s1, Table S1. Break-up of economics of Maize production in Nepal. Institutional Review Board Statement: For all socioeconomic surveys and data collection from family or community representatives, the Institutional Research Ethics Committee (IREC) of the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) classified this study as having no risk for human subjects and approved the study. Relevant IREC guidelines and regulations were followed.The front page of each questionnaire carried a section where the person being interviewed indicated her/his informed consent for the interview. Interviewers were trained and required to read the consent statement aloud to each interviewee before the interview could advance. Participants were informed that they were under no obligation to answer any questions and could stop the interview at any time, without giving any reasons, and could ask for any partial data to be removed from the records.Data Availability Statement: Data will be made available on request.","tokenCount":"6634"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1372723275.json b/data/part_2/1372723275.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b96543606b709456e3e49c650e41442130917092 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1372723275.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d47a260dc4c273710677fa66d6cc6f54","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/d571288e-433e-4c4f-8bd4-a0130624ca13/retrieve","id":"-352870638"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"6260aff2-971b-4ef1-9355-33767aa97efd","pagecount":"36","content":"Our overall assessment of 2015 was positive, but it was a challenging year for the program! In the space of twelve months we saw changes in governance, an external evaluation, an audit review, preparation of documents for Phase II of the CGIAR Research Program and some signifi cant budget adjustments. We made it through with some considerable achievements, thanks to our dedicated scientists, strong partnerships, engaged management team and committed governance group.We are very pleased to report that 2015 brought continued successes in research outputs, documented in the sections which follow, and also, adoption and enhanced outcomes as captured in the dashboard, a new feature in this year's report.We are very satisfi ed with our newly created Independent Steering Committee (ISC), which provided an institutional mechanism for checks-and-balances within the program, with clear and specifi c roles and responsibilities. The ISC comprises nine members, a majority of them are independent; Barbara Wells as the Director General (DG) of the International Potato Center (CIP) as a permanent member, a DG of another participating center on a rotating appointment, presently Bioversity International, a high-level representative of Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD), and Graham Thiele the CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB) Program Director as ex-offi cio member. Chaired by Helen Hambly Odame of University of Guelph, in Canada, the ISC provided us with inspirational leadership in thinking about partnerships, theories of change, gender and risk management. The face-to-face meeting of the RTB ISC in Lima in September 2015 provided a critical sounding board to guide future development. Together with the CIP Board of Trustees, the ISC provided a high level of oversight and support in planning and reporting program activities. ISC was especially attentive to the preparation of our Pre-Proposal for Phase II, which was highly rated by the CGIAR.We are proud of RTB's achievements, refl ected in the 2015 Independent Evaluation Arrangement (IEA) review, which noted that \"in spite of the complexities and challenges of successfully implementing a multi-crop and multi-partner CRP, RTB has made notable progress in the past four years and is already delivering results, in spite of budget cuts. RTB is well-directed and reaching a reasonable number of its near-term milestones and is working towards achieving its goals, particularly those concerning productivity and nutritional improvement\". In the same positive spirit, the Independent Audit Unit (IAU) review, also carried out in 2015, commented: \"RTB has done an impressive job in structuring the CRP to best minimize costs and obtain consensus\".In 2015, however, the program was challenged by two reductions in the overall level of funding. RTB and its partners managed these risks through fl exibly adjusted contractual arrangements with participating centers and compromises in the achievements of originally envisaged deliverables; although, thanks to high level of support from centers and scientists, strong progress was still made.As RTB moves to the end of the current phase, and plans for the next from 2017-2022, we are giving close attention to consolidating innovations and tracking progress in pursuance of alleviating poverty and improving food security.CIP Director General RTB Program DirectorThe CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB) was launched in 2012 to harness the untapped potential of banana, plantain, cassava, potato, sweetpotato, yam, and other root and tuber crops to improve food security, nutrition and livelihoods. It brings together the expertise and resources of fi ve centers: the International Potato Center (CIP), which leads the program, Bioversity International (Bioversity), the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD), which represents several other French partners in the research program. They have teamed up to collaborate on common issues aff ecting the RTB crops, mobilize complementary expertise and resources, avoid duplication of eff orts, and create synergies to increase the benefi ts of their research and interventions for smallholder farmers, consumers, and other actors involved in root, tuber and banana value chains.In 2015 RTB began the fi rst year of a two-year extension period for Phase I. This gave time to strengthen and expand the program's network of partners and improve management, whilst retaining organization around seven disciplinary Themes 1 . RTB fi nalized the move to a new program structure, based on fl agship projects (FPs) and clusters of activities (cluster), starting from January 2016. FPs and cluster business cases were laid out by RTB scientist teams, including partners, and were subjected to an intensive external review process in May/June 2015. Detailed feedback from this review, the Independent Evaluation Arrangement review, and donors, as well as broad discussions among the RTB teams, informed the cluster design, their integration into FPs and the new program structure. This laid the groundwork for the submission of the Preproposal for RTB Phase II, which was highly rated by the CGIAR Independent Science and Partnership Council.RTB centers broadened their collaborations to 366 partners, including 91 national agricultural research organizations, 102 academic and advanced research institutions, 28 non-governmental organizations, and 45 private sector companies.In 2015 the program had eight ongoing, internally funded competitive grants, guided by RTB Theme leaders, on discovery research and cross-center and cross-crop technological innovations, as well as four ex-post impact assessment studies. Much of the results of this research is presented in the body of this report.The results-based management (RBM) pilot, which began in 2014, continued with banana Xanthomonas wilt, potato seed, and nextgeneration breeding. The pilot was extended to small-scale cassava processing in 2015 with two workshops in Nigeria, to co-develop an impact pathway and shared monitoring and evaluation. To support RBM, RTB together with the CGIAR Research Program on Dryland Systems developed a planning, monitoring, evaluation, and learning information technology platform.RTB's targets, known as Intermediate Development Outcomes (IDOs), are fully aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).1 Theme 1: Unlocking the value and use potential of genetic resources; Theme 2: Accelerating the development and selection of cultivars with higher, more stable yield and added value; Theme 3: Managing priority pests and diseases; Theme 4: Making available low-cost, high-quality planting material for farmers; Theme 5: Developing tools for more productive, ecologically robust cropping systems; Theme 6: Promoting post-harvest technologies, value chains, and market opportunities; and Theme 7: Enhancing impact through partnerships.Increased incomes and • 20,000,000 people (50% women) increased their income employment• 30,000 small and medium enterprises operating profi tably in the RTB seed and processing sectors Increased productivity• 8,000,000 farm households increased RTB crop yield through the adoption of improved varieties and sustainable management practices Improved diets for poor and • 10,000,000 people (50% women) have improved their diet quality vulnerable people Enhanced benefi ts from• 1,900,000 ha of current RTB crops production area converted to sustainable ecosystem goods and services cropping systems More sustainably managed agro-ecosystem• Capacity to deal with climate risks and extremes increased for at least 2,000,000 achieved households Equity and inclusion achieved • At least 35% increase in # of female and young benefi ciaries of at least 700,000 households perceived to have better control over assets and resources Enabling environment• Individual capacities improved for at least 9,500 individuals (50% women) in improved research for development partner organizations • Capacity for innovation increased in at least 60 development-focused organizations, including women's networks and alliances • At least 5 partnership and scaling models tested in a minimum of 5 target countries and adjusted to be fi t for purpose National partners and• Regulatory frame works, policies, and national programs in relevant areas under benefi ciaries enabled implementation in at least 20 countries per policy changeWhile moving forward on research to improve the yield and value of roots, tubers and bananas, RTB made signifi cant progress on the crosscutting priority of integrating gender into its research, which will make RTB's work more eff ective and equitable.A concerted eff ort to mainstream gender during the research program's fi rst years has resulted in a growing list of gender-responsive research. For example, six graduate students from gender and development programs at US and Canadian universities worked with RTB scientists in 2015 to integrate gender analysis into their agricultural research, thanks to an RTB-university partnership. The students' contributions ranged from identifying gender-diff erentiated variables that infl uence the adoption of improved banana cultivars in Uganda to studying women's role in cassava pest management in Laos and adapting gender sensitive farmer business schools in Ecuador.Researchers from Bioversity, IITA and national partners developed and implemented a methodology for assessing the roles of gender norms and practices in banana farming and disease management at nine pilot sites in Sub-Saharan Africa, which resulted in gender-responsive guidelines for the management of banana bunchy top disease. CIP researchers developed a gender-responsive manual for participatory varietal selection (PVS) in potato and a PVS training module that was tested in Ethiopia, whereas IITA implemented a gender-responsive PVS methodology for yam with national partners in Ghana and Nigeria.CIP developed a prototype guide to integrating gender into the participatory market chain approach that is being fi eld tested under a joint initiative between RTB and the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutes and Markets. CIAT, CIRAD, IITA, Natural Resources Institute and national partners in Benin, Cameroon, Nigeria, Sierra Leone and Tanzania completed a gender-diff erentiated assessment of consumer preferences for processed cassava products. These and other gender-responsive initiatives under RTB will promote more equitable access to technologies and knowledge being developed.Integrating gender to make crop research more eff ective Crop breeding and the dissemination of improved varieties has been a cornerstone of research for development in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) for decades, and RTB scientists contributed to research on the impact of this work which is featured in the book Crop Improvement, Adoption, and Impact of Improved Varieties in Food Crops in Sub-Saharan Africa, published in 2015. This ambitious review contains a wealth of information on decades of cassava, yam, potato and sweetpotato improvement in SSA, and it holds lessons for strengthening future eff orts to tap the potential of RTB crops for improving food security, nutrition and livelihoods.The book, which covers the development and distribution of improved varieties of 20 crops in 30 countries, grew out of the 'Diff usion and Impact of Improved Varieties in Africa' study funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. It confi rms the important role that RTB centers have played in strengthening crop improvement in SSA, but also shows that it takes a long time to develop and disseminate improved varieties, which is why RTB has prioritized innovations that accelerate the breeding process.Cassava is the second most consumed staple food in SSA, and the book documents the important role that IITA has played in improving that crop. Of the 367 improved cassava varieties released in 17 SSA countries between 1970 and 2010, more than 80% were IITA-bred or from IITA parents. According to expert estimates, IITA-related varieties were grown in approximately 30% of the total cassava area in SSA in 2009. IITA's yam improvement program has also had a signifi cant impact, with IITA-related varieties accounting for 13% of the 78 yam varieties developed or identifi ed for release between 1970 and 2010.The book also documents CIP's important role in potato and sweetpotato improvement in SSA. CIP was involved in the development of 42 of the 45 improved potato varieties released in Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Rwanda and Uganda over the past decade. And of the 60 new sweetpotato varieties re-leased in Burundi, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda since 2000, 19 were CIP-bred and seven were bred by national agricultural research organizations using CIP parents.Many improved varieties have low adoption rates, and it is hard to determine whether that is due to problems with the varieties or inadequate dissemination. Yet some are widely adopted, and they off er lessons for breeding programs. One success story is the potato variety Victoria, which was selected by a CIP breeder in Uganda for release in the 1990s. By 2010, high-yielding, early-maturity Victoria covered more than half of Uganda's potato-growing area and was the second most popular variety in Kenya. There are many more success stories, such as the cassava variety Rugero (MM96/5280), released in Burundi in 2001, which covered 16.4% of Burundi's cassava area in 2009; or the variety Sauti (CH92/077), released in Malawi in 2002, which covered 16.8% of that country's cassava area in 2009.Weighted average adoption of improved potato varieties in Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda and Uganda in 2010 was 37%, but the weighted average adoption of improved sweetpotato varieties in Burundi, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda was just 7% of the sweetpotato area. However, crop area may be a poor indicator of the success of CIP's eff orts to get vitamin A-rich orange-fl eshed sweetpotato varieties into the hands of the region's poorest farmers, especially women. In Uganda, for example, where sweetpotato covers just 2.6% of agricultural land, 8% of households grow the crop.Nevertheless, cultivation of improved potato and sweetpotato varieties needs to be expanded in SSA, and CIP is working on multiple fronts to achieve this. The book will contribute to improving such eff orts, and it has arrived just as RTB crop breeders are tapping the potential of genomic data and other scientifi c advances to accelerate the breeding of the improved varieties that African farmers need. Unlocking the value and use potential of genetic resources Accelerating the development of cultivars with higher, more stable yield and added value RTB undertook an array of eff orts to tap the potential of crop genetic resources for improving food security and incomes in 2015, including the use of high-throughput genotyping, phenotyping and metabolite analysis to accelerate and enhance crop improvement. Multi-center research made progress toward linking high-density genomic data to traits in cassava and banana, while genomic data were applied to potato improvement and genomic sequencing began for sweetpotato and yam.Thousands of cassava accessions have been sequenced, and CIAT and IITA researchers used the data to reconstruct the history of the crop's domestication and diversifi cation patterns, which can help breeders to identify populations with desired traits. CIAT completed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for cassava in Latin America and the Caribbean, and ran trials to investigate the genetic components underlying consumer preferred traits. IITA researchers increased the accuracy and reliability of genomic selection and identifi ed genes linked to traits of interest.Genomic data from 400 banana accessions were generated through RAD-seq and a new bioinformatics tool called scaff hunter was developed to integrate multiple sources of sequencing data for improving the banana reference genome. CIRAD, Bioversity and partners released a new version of the banana gene annotation, and version two of the reference genome assembly was released on the renovated Banana Genome Hub. Bioversity also undertook GWAS on a panel of 126 diploid banana accessions to detect genomic regions involved in parthenocarpy and female sterility.CIP breeders used genomic data to select true seed potato progenies of 24 families from crosses between parents with neutral photoperiod and earliness under warm temperatures that are undergoing fi eld trials in Uzbekistan and Peru. In sweetpotato, the sequencing of 250 drought-tolerant and 250 drought-susceptible accessions marked the fi rst step toward locating the genes responsible for drought tolerance. In the coming years, genomic and metabolite data will increasingly be used to enhance crop improvement.Assessing the impact of crop improvement has traditionally been hindered by the fact that varieties look very similar, but an innovative genetic analysis of the main cassava varieties being grown in Ghana marks a breakthrough for reliably estimating adoption rates in impact assessment studies.Researchers from IITA, Michigan State University and Ghana's Council for Scientifi c and Industrial Research -Crops Research Institute (CSIR-CRI) collected more than 900 samples of cassava grown by 495 farming households in Ghana's top cassava-producing regions, sent them to Cornell University for genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS), and compared their genetic 'fi ngerprints' with those of 64 cassava accessions held at CSIR-CRI (common landraces and released varieties) that were used as a 'reference library' . The results provide an unequivocal view of the actual varieties being cultivated across Ghana.The researchers found that 30% of the cassava collected on the farms matched specifi c released varieties, which is consistent with the results of a prior impact assessment. However, their analysis revealed widespread discrepancies in the names of varieties and landraces. While the farmers provided 180 diff erent variety names for the 917 cassava accessions collected, genetic analysis revealed that many were actually the same variety, whereas some accessions with the same name were genetically diff erent.\"One of the biggest lessons is that you can't rely on common names of varieties, \" said Ismail Rabbi, a cassava geneticist at IITA who led the study's DNA fi ngerprinting component. \"You also can't always rely on morphological characteristics, because these are infl uenced by environmental conditions and plant growth stages. The methods traditionally used to assess the impact of crop improvement are not as reliable as DNA fi ngerprinting. \"Genetic analysis showed that 69% of the accessions collected belong to 11 major variety groups, whereas the rest are the result of inter-varietal crosses. Nearly a quarter of the accessions collected were the same landrace, which farmers identifi ed as Ankra, Bankye kokoo, Debor, etc., whereas approximately 17% belonged to a landrace that was evaluated and released by Ghanaian universities in 2004-2005 as 'IFAD' and 'UCC' . This means that about 40% of Ghanaian farmers grow just two varieties.\"These two varieties are grown all over the place. We should do more research to understand why they are so popular, \" Rabbi said. He explained that characterizing the two varieties' traits could help cassava breeders ensure that improved clones coming out of their breeding pipelines have those traits, and thereby increase farmer uptake.A comparable but more comprehensive study underway in Nigeria, with support from RTB and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, involved the collection of more than 8,000 cassava samples from 2,500 farms that will be compared to a reference library of nearly 4,000 accessions. The results of this study, to be completed in 2016, will provide a clear picture of the distribution patterns of improved varieties and landraces across Nigeria.Rabbi observed that genetic fi ngerprinting can also be used to identify gaps and duplicates in genebanks, in order to make their collections more comprehensive while reducing redundancies. Several of the more common cassava landraces collected in the Ghana study weren't represented in the reference library, which also included identical accessions with diff erent names. Moreover, genetic analysis revealed that the 64 accessions in that reference library were actually just 34 unique cultivars, 16 of which were released varieties. To avoid such problems, IITA researchers are using GBS to improve the IITA cassava genebank collection.\"Genome-wide genetic markers are useful for a variety of identifi cation applications, \" said Rabbi, who explained that the study also provided information on the ancestry of and relations between specifi c varieties and breeding lines, which can help cassava breeders to better classify their material and identify sources of traits.He added that such research is only possible thanks to recent advances and reductions in the cost of next-generation sequencing technologies. \"This is something that we could not have imagined just a few years ago, \" he said.Yam is an important source of food and income in Ghana and Nigeria, which is why RTB is supporting an accelerated breeding pipeline for yam improvement in those countries. In order to ensure that the varieties coming out of that pipeline meet the needs of farmers, and thereby improve the probability that smallholders adopt them, researchers at IITA helped breeders at national programs in Ghana and Nigeria to design and implement a participatory varietal selection (PVS) methodology for yam. That methodology, which puts farmers in charge of fi eld trials and the selection of the varieties best suited for local preferences and environmental conditions, resulted in the selection of the fi ve best new varieties for each of three diff erent agroecologies.IITA yam breeder Antonio Lopez-Montes, who led the PVS initiative, explained that breeders at the national programs didn't pay enough attention to farmer-preferred traits in the past, and largely ignored women's preferences. IITA researchers consequently worked with 23 yam breeders and technicians at the National Root Crops Research Institute in Nigeria, and the Crops Research Institute and Savanna Agriculture Research Institute in Ghana, to adapt and implement a gender-responsive PVS for yam.The three institutes partnered with thousands of farmers who ran fi eld trials for 24 yam varieties developed by IITA and participated in evaluations that resulted in the selection of the top fi ve varieties recommended for release in Northern Ghana, Central Ghana and Nigeria. The initiative took place within the framework of the 'Yam Improvement for Income and Food Security in West Africa' project, funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.A total of 4,328 farmers in the two countries participated, including 1,323 women. Lopez-Montes explained that they made an eff ort to involve as many women as possible so that selected varieties would meet the needs of both women and men, in order to ensure greater adoption. He added that farmers were involved in the design of fi eld trials -deciding issues such as plant density and fertilizer application -which they ran. Farmers evaluated the va-A total of 4,328 farmers in the two countries participated in the project, including 1,323 women.Lopez-Montes explained that they made an eff ort to involve as many women as possible The farmers also contributed to the design of agronomic packages for diff erent production systems that were scaled out for validation with the selected varieties in 2016. Lopez-Montes noted that the farmer-led focus on production systems, rather than agroecologies, is important because the performance of varieties can vary signifi cantly from one production system to the next. While all varieties were bred for drought-prone environments and poor soils, the farmer evaluations included traits such as fl avor and the number and size of tubers produced by each plant. Evaluation data were disaggregated according to gender and age group.Lopez-Montes observed that while men were more interested in varieties that produce one large tuber, which demands a high market price, women preferred varieties that produce multiple tubers of diff erent sizes, in order to sell the big ones but save the smaller ones for family consumption and seed.He added that IITA breeders have already developed new populations of improved yams with traits preferred by women that are ready to be delivered to the three institutes, and they will continue to develop populations with combinations of the traits preferred by women and men. This should enhance adoption and improve household food security, as women pay more attention to the full spectrum of family needs.To complement farmer criteria, breeders collected and analyzed quantitative data on traits such as dry matter content, the number of ware and seed yam per plant, and the incidence and severity of pests and diseases. However, Lopez-Montes noted that farmer criteria were the drivers of the selection process and that the quantitative data supported the farmers' selections.\"We implemented this project to demonstrate the advantages of using PVS to increase a new variety's impact, \" Lopez-Montes said. \"The national breeders recognized that this approach can ensure greater adoption, because the farmers already accepted these varieties during the selection process. \"In 2015, two virus-resistant potato varieties -salt-tolerant CIP-301029.18 and salt-and heat-tolerant CIP-396311.1 -were evaluated in coastal districts of Bangladesh where soil salinity is a growing threat. They had higher yields than popular varieties and were recommended for release, which means they will soon join a growing cadre of CIP-bred, climate-smart potato varieties that are helping farmers produce food in diffi cult environments that will become more challenging as the atmosphere warms.In recent years, CIP breeders have prioritized developing heat-, droughtand salt-tolerant potato varieties from CIP's lowland tropics virusresistant (LTVR) population, some of which are already being grown by farmers in countries such as Kenya, India and Vietnam. In 2015, the CIP Genebank began sending germplasm from a new, more robust generation of approximately 80 LTVR varieties to national agricultural research organizations in African and Asian countries where environmental stresses that are expected to intensify under climate change are already hindering smallholders' ability to produce food.Improved potato variety 'Qingshu 9' a success story in China and beyondIn their eff orts to improve the food security and livelihoods of farmers around the world, potato breeders at CIP strive to develop marketable, resilient varieties with resistance to viruses and late blight that can be grown in an array of environments. An excellent example of the potential of such a potato is CIP variety No. 392797.22, a high-yielding clone that can be found in fi elds all over China and is grown in several other countries. The Chinese government is promoting potato production to improve food security, and CIP 392797.22 has proven to be an excellent option for the country's farmers.Originally developed in Peru in the 1990s, the variety was selected from a cross of CIP No. 387521.3 and 'Aphrodite' , from CIP's lowland tropics virus resistant population. It was fi eld tested in Peru's lowlands and mountains and was fi rst released to farmers in 1998 by the National University San Luis Gonzaga, Ica under the name 'UNICA' . Field trials showed that it has a stable, high yield in varied environments, is resistant to viruses, and tolerates drought. It also produces quality potatoes with red skin and yellow fl esh that are good for fresh consumption and have the qualities needed for French fry production.\"The evaluation of improved populations in Peru's warm, arid coastal and cool, humid mountain regions is key to identifying varieties adapted to the diff erent, challenging environments of the tropics, and can help broaden adaptation even to temperate environments such as those of Northern China and Central Asia, \" explained Merideth Bonierbale, who leads CIP's genetics, genomics and crop improvement research. \"RTB is supporting CIP's genetic research to systematize and accelerate breeding of varieties with this combination of adaptive resistance and quality traits through genomic selection. \"UNICA was introduced to China from CIP in 2001 by the Qinghai (Provincial) Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences. Following evaluation by the Qinghai Crop Variety Assessment Committee, it was released as a provincial variety in Qinghai in 2006 with the name 'Qingshu 9' -Qing referring to the Qinghai Academy and shu being the Chinese word for potato. AfterIn order to ensure that the banana varieties developed by IITA and Uganda's National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO) have the traits that men and women farmers want, RTB scientists developed a methodology for a gender-diff erentiated baseline study that was undertaken in collaboration with NARO and the Agricultural Research Institute in Tanzania in 2015 and early 2016.Rhiannon Crichton, a postdoctoral fellow at Bioversity who is coordinating the study, explained that its results will strengthen RTBsupported banana improvement in East Africa by ensuring that women and men benefi t fully from the banana hybrids that national breeding programs develop. The study's gender responsiveness was strengthened by Bioversity researchers Susan Ajambo and Anne Rietveld, and Emily Albertson -a graduate student at Clark University who participated thanks to an RTB partnership with US universities.N.PALMER/CIAT assessment at a national level, Qingshu 9 was released as a national variety in 2011, and over the next fi ve years, it came to be planted in China's main potato production regions. At the same time, the variety has been introduced to Kenya, Rwanda, Ethiopia, Vietnam, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, and is slated for release in Bangladesh in 2017.Kaiyun Xie, a potato specialist at CIP's China Center for Asia and the Pacifi c, explained that farmers across Northern and Southwest China have adopted Qingshu 9, primarily because it produces well and consumers like it. According to preliminary expert consultations, Qingshu 9 was grown in 13 major potato-producing provinces in China in 2015, when it covered approximately one third of the potato-farming area of Qinghai Province, 14% of the potato area in Ningxia Province and 6% of the potato area in Gansu Province.Local experts estimated that more than 150,000 hectares in China were planted with Qingshu 9 in 2015. Given an average yield of 30 tons per hectare, compared to a national average of 20 tons per hectare, it is estimated that Chinese farmers produced approximately 4.5 million tons of Qingshu 9 potatoes in 2015. Xie noted that various companies are selling seed potatoes for Qingshu 9, so the area planted with the variety is likely to increase in 2016.\"This variety represents a successful case of breeding broadly-adapted and marketable potatoes with combined resistance to major diseases, a feature that helps farmers lower production costs and access new markets with reduced risk of crop loss, \" observed Bonierbale.Kaiyun Xie, a potato specialist at CIP's China Center for Asia and the Pacifi c, explained that many farmers across Northern and Southwest China have adopted Qingshu 9Improving the management of priority pests and diseases Making available low-cost, highquality planting material for farmers Pests and diseases cause major crop loss in developing countries and they constitute an especially serious threat for root, tuber and banana crops, which are propagated vegetatively -by planting tubers, suckers, stems or vine cuttings. This means that pests and pathogens are often passed from one planting cycle to the next, or one fi eld to another, via planting material. RTB has addressed major pest and disease threats through initiatives that bring together experts from multiple centers and partners. These initiatives include an eff ort to assess the risks posed by RTB-critical pests under climate change and cross-crop research on the accumulation of pathogens in planting material, known as seed degeneration. RTB also supports eff orts to improve the management of specifi c diseases, such as banana Xanthomonas wilt disease, an eff ective management package for which is being scaled out in Central Africa.RTB initiatives to improve disease management often include the establishment of clean seed systems. CIAT, for example, has promoted thermotherapy for producing disease-free plantain and banana seed as part of eff orts to control Moko bacterial wilt. CIP has long promoted clean seed systems to prevent yield loss from the accumulation of viruses in potato and an impact study of an intervention in Kenya that helped Kisima Farms Ltd. begin producing certifi ed potato seed determined that it benefi ted approximately 23,000 smallholders between 2010 and 2014. Even more farmers are likely to benefi t from a potato seed initiative launched by the Government of Ecuador in 2015 using CIP-validated, aeroponic propagation technology and guidance from CIP researchers. The government's goal is to expand the area planted with disease-free seed to approximately 30% of the potato-growing area in Ecuador by 2018. Such private and public uses of the technologies that RTB centers develop and disseminate confi rm the value of RTB's research for development.Pests and diseases already pose major threats to the food security and livelihoods of smallholders. With climate change, these threats are generally expected to grow and also expand to unaff ected areas. However, knowledge is limited about exactly which threats will be more severe and in what geographic areas.An RTB eff ort to fi ll this knowledge gap for critical banana, cassava, potato and sweetpotato pests and diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa has produced data for predicting how those threats will evolve under climate change and strengthened the capacity of government institutions to deal with them today.RTB centers have begun analyzing data from weather stations and farm surveys at action sites in the Rwanda's Ruhengeri region and Burundi's Rusizi Valley while researchers completed laboratory experiments to determine how rising temperatures aff ect the lifecycles of key pests and disease vectors. Harmonized pest and disease fi eld surveys were carried out at both actions sites during one cropping season, whereas weather data collection has been ongoing since July 2014. The goal is to compile two years of weather and farm data for use in modeling climate change impacts on pest and disease risks.At the same time, RTB researchers and partners have worked with representatives of national research and regulatory institutions in Burundi, DR Congo, Rwanda and Uganda to strengthen the surveillance of critical pests and diseases and the capacity to elaborate eff ective responses using pest risk analysis (PRA) documents and pest risk maps. PRA documents and risk maps are important tools for national or regional eff orts to prevent the entry of new pests and diseases and help farmers prepare for evolving pest and disease threats.At a workshop on PRA and surveillance held in Kigali, Rwanda in October 2015, draft PRA documents were developed with national partners for the tomato/potato leaf miner (Tuta absoluta), whitefl y-vectored cassava brown streak virus, aphid-vectored banana bunchy top disease (BBTD), banana Xanthomonas wilt (BXW) and the invasive strain of Panama Disease Foc Tr4.According to Jürgen Kroschel, the project leader and Science Leader for Agroecology and Integrated Pest Management at CIP, RTB's support of PRA training and elaboration complements eff orts by the FAO and the UK Food and Environment Research Agency and Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International (CABI) to promote the drafting and application of PRA documents by African ministries of agriculture. He added that RTB has improved PRA documents through the addition of pest risk maps, which illustrate potential pest entry and range expansion.PRA documents drafted at the Kigali workshop have since been refi ned using data from laboratory and fi eld research. RTB researchers generated data on the prevalence of the major diseases in the region. Bioversity scientists conducted fi ve surveys of BBTD and BXW incidence along altitude gradients in Eastern DR Congo, the Rusizi Valley/Lake Tanganyika area and Western Burundi. IITA scientists conducted biological surveys in Burundi and Rwanda to determine the phenotypic and genetic characteristics of the pathogens responsible for cassava mosaic disease, cassava brown streak disease and BBTD. And CIP researchers completed a thorough analysis of the late blight pathogen Phytophthora infestans population in Kenya and Uganda.RTB scientists used a number of approaches to assess the risks that major pests pose in the region. CIP researchers used life-table data for T. absoluta to develop a preliminary pest phenology model and risk maps with Insect Life-Cycle Modeling software. Using the program CLIMEX, CIAT researchers developed potential distribution maps for the cassava green mites Mononychellus tanajoa and Mononychellus mcgregori -based on 1,232 occurrence records for M. tanajoa and 99 for M. mcgregori. CIAT researchers submitted distribution records of cassava green mites and cassava whitefl ies -major virus vectors -to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, ensuring open access for modeling purposes. Researchers also developed an interactive database for cassava whitefl ies that will be launched in 2016.Through a combination of scientifi c research and capacity building, the project will continue to help national authorities to assess and prepare for evolving pest risks so that they can deal with them proactively.Banana bunchy top disease (BBTD) is a hugely destructive disease that is sweeping across Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). RTB is working in eight countries in SSA and has made encouraging progress in building farmers' capacity to fi ght back. Action research at pilot sites tested community strategies for reducing disease pressure to facilitate recovery of banana production while scientists advanced knowledge of the disease's epidemiology, developed tests for detecting it, and raised awareness of the threat it poses.BBTD is caused by the banana bunchy top virus (BBTV), which invades new fi elds or regions via the banana aphid Pentalonia nigronervosa or infected planting material. RTB scientists are consequently studying the virus and aphid vector while working with national partners and communities to establish systems for producing disease-free banana planting material. They've improved knowledge of the disease through laboratory research, fi eld trials and surveys at pilot sites in Nigeria, Benin, Gabon, Cameroon, Congo, DR Congo, Malawi and Burundi to determine the extent of BBTD's impact.\"We now understand much better the serious nature of this threat, \" said Charles Staver, a senior scientist at Bioversity, coordinator of the BBTD initiative and RTB project leader. He explained that the disease has been reported in 14 countries in SSA, and while incipient in countries such as Benin and Nigeria, it is widespread in the Congo River Basin. Researchers at the University of Kisangani estimated that BBTD threatens the banana and plantain production of over 5 million households in the DR Congo, whereas researchers in Burundi estimated that the disease has reached 500,000 farms. Staver warned that the disease is spreading in West Africa and is poised to advance further into East Africa.The alliance has raised awareness of this threat while working at nine pilot sites in eight countries -representing the major banana production systems in SSA -to test strategies for re-establishing banana production in areas where BBTD has devastated the crop. Results from pilot sites show that the Building communities' capacity to control and recover from the banana disease BBTD \"We now understand much better the serious nature of this threat, \" said Charles Staver, a senior scientist at Bioversity, coordinator of the BBTD initiative and RTB project leader. most eff ective strategy is to uproot all banana plants, maintain farms free of banana for at least six months, and replant with BBTV-free planting material while maintaining banana-free buff er zones around the replanted fi elds. If these practices are followed, banana production can be recovered for at least two or three harvests. However, the disease usually re-invades the farm, indicating a need for further research.From the onset of work at the pilot sites, RTB researchers collaborated with local partners on gender research to better understand the roles of men and women in areas such as community decision-making and farm management. Staver explained that cross-site lessons learned from that gender research will enhance impending eff orts to scale out successful recovery strategies.\"RTB partners have catalyzed commitments from African governments, the FAO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to strengthen eff orts to study and control BBTD, \" affi rmed IITA virologist Lava Kumar. He gave the example of collaboration between IITA and several Nigerian government agencies to launch a \"Stop Bunchy Top\" campaign in early 2016 to halt the disease's advance within Nigeria.Kumar explained that an essential component of such eff orts is the ability to detect BBTV in plants and aphids, and RTB has contributed to the development of two new technologies for BBTV detection: a diagnostic test based on loop-mediated isothermal amplifi cation (CT-LAMP) and a recombinase polymerase amplifi cation assay. Plant virologist Marie-Line Iskra-Caruana, of CIRAD, noted that one advantage of the CT-LAMP assay is that it detects the virus in low concentrations, so it is useful for testing planting material and early detection in mature plants.Bioversity associate scientist Aman Omondi observed that another important achievement is that the RTB initiative has trained representatives of national research institutes, universities and ministries of agriculture in areas ranging from BBTD diagnostics to clean seed systems. As the disease spreads and the RTB researchers develop more tools for controlling it, this critical mass of trained people will lead the battle to defeat BBTD.The accumulation and synergistic eff ect of multiple viruses simultaneously aff ecting sweetpotato constitute one of the worst biotic constraints for African farmers. CIP researchers consequently contributed to the creation of an interactive, online database of viruses aff ecting sweetpotato in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) -known as the Pan-African Sweetpotato Virome -in order to help breeders develop virus-resistant varieties and predict and control the threat posed by viruses.The database was developed in collaboration with the Boyce Thompson Institute at Cornell University. It contains information on viruses identifi ed in more than 1,600 sweetpotato samples collected in farmers' fi elds in 10 SSA countries, and includes a map of fi eld locations and photos of infected plants. It can be used to guide breeding eff orts, identify high-risk areas, and monitor the emergence of novel viral variants. It will also serve as a model for a new database on the potato virome (the viruses infecting potato) in Peru.Heat can make a diff erence: production of disease-free banana seed RTB researchers have shown that heat treatment can be a cost-eff ective tool for controlling disease transmission in banana and plantain.In partnership with the Colombian Plantain Growers Federation (FEDEPLA-TANO) scientists at CIAT standardized a prototype of a thermotherapy chamber for propagating clean planting material that has proven to be eff ective and adaptable. Plantain corms are placed in a chamber to sprout under controlled conditions of temperature (50º-70ºC) and high humidity, with frequent fertigation, producing healthy seedlings faster than traditional methods.The technology was further validated by Bioversity plant pathologist Miguel Dita, who built a prototype chamber at the Center for Tropical Agricultural Research and Higher Education, in Costa Rica, and has since been adopted by organizations in several countries. FEDEPLATANO and CIAT built a large thermal chamber in La Tebaida Quindío, Colombia that produces disease-free plantain planting material for approximately 7,000 farmers. CIAT also collaborated with the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation for the construction of another large, fully automated chamber for plantain farmers in Northeast Brazil.\"Larger thermal chambers are an effi cient option for the mass production of clean seed for farmer associations, \" explained CIAT researcher Elizabeth Alvarez. \"However, the technology has also been successfully adapted for smaller scale operations. \"Alvarez cited the example of simplifi ed thermal chambers built by farmers in El Salvador. With technical assistance from CIAT and FEDEPLATANO, and support from the NGOs Oxfam, Caritas and Catholic Relief Services, farmer associations in the department of Morazán built tunnel-formed chambers using translucent plastic sheets and other inexpensive materials that now produce clean banana seed for about 1,650 smallholders, 350 of who are women.CIAT has promoted the technology with manuals in Spanish and English via the Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) banana network and has collabo-rated with CIRAD to promote it as a way to control the banana and plantain disease Moko bacterial wilt in LAC. The technology has also been tested in Peru, and there are plans to evaluate it in Ecuador, Nicaragua, Panama, Cameroon and DR Congo.Meanwhile IITA researchers have validated an even simpler thermotherapy option for cleaning banana and plantain suckers of nematodes. IITA researcher Stefan Hauser explained that farmers merely need to dip suckers into boiling water for 30 seconds prior to planting to kill nematodes, adding that research has demonstrated that this practice improves yields. IITA has promoted the boiling water method to African banana and plantain farmers through a manual and fl yers in multiple languages, and demonstrations for more than 1,000 farmers in Cameroon, Nigeria and Zanzibar.A cross-center initiative to improve the understanding and management of seed degeneration -reductions in yield and quality due to the accumulation of pathogens in planting material over successive planting cycles -has shed new light on degeneration's dynamics.Research in Africa showed that farmers maintain sweetpotato viruses in local landraces at manageable levels using rouging (eliminating diseased plants) and positive selection (choosing healthy seed for the next planting cycle). However, some viruses are asymptomatic and may cause more yield loss in the long run than viruses with visible symptoms because farmers can't identify infected plants for removal. Potato scientists in Ecuador demonstrated that reversion (natural reduction of pathogen incidence within a seed lot) takes place at higher altitudes, confi rming the validity of a traditional practice of moving seed to high altitudes to 'clean' it. Data from fi eld trials in Africa and Latin America are being used to model the eff ectiveness of such common approaches for controlling seed degeneration.Farmers in SSA often can't get enough sweetpotato vines for planting when seasonal rains begin, since vines and roots don't survive the dry season, limiting adoption. CIP has developed and tested a root-based vine multiplication system called Triple S (sand, storage and sprouting) in Uganda, Tanzania and Ethiopia to overcome this bottleneck, with promising results.Farmers store sweetpotato roots in dry sand during the dry season and plant them in seedbeds 6-8 weeks before the rains begin. After successful trials in Tanzania and Uganda, Triple S was scaled out in fi ve districts in northern Uganda. A seasonal calendar with information on when to store and plant roots was distributed in two local languages, 18 community facilitators were trained, and 634 farmers engaged. Triple S was also tested in a region of Ethiopia where the dry season is one month longer than Uganda's, and 82% of roots sprouted successfully after four months in dry sand.Breaking the bottleneck for sweetpotato planting materialAlvarez noted that CIAT has also promoted thermotherapy to combat the spread of cassava frogskin disease, with thermal chambers of various sizes for producing clean cassava planting material built in several departments of Colombia, Brazil, Costa Rica and Paraguay. She added that the technology could likely be adapted for other crops as well.Developing tools for more productive, ecologically robust cropping systems Promoting postharvest technologies, value chains and market opportunities While supporting research on the diversifi cation of cropping systems, RTB made major commitments to improving the postharvest handling and processing of roots, tubers and bananas, which can help smallholders access better markets, improve the incomes of value-chain participants, and create employment. RTB crops are perishable, creating special challenges for value chain interventions, but a three-year, multi-center project to improve postharvest handling and utilization in Uganda (RTB-ENDURE) is testing strategies for reducing postharvest loss in banana, extending cassava shelf life, improving potato storage, and creating silage from sweetpotato leaves and other by products that can be used as pig feed -all of which have potential for scaling out on a regional level. Cassava is especially problematic for farmers and retailers because its roots undergo rapid postharvest physiological deterioration (PPD). A south-south knowledge sharing trip organized by CIAT, CIRAD and IITA allowed seven members of the RTB-ENDURE cassava team to travel to CIAT headquarters in Colombia and learn about PPD control methods such as waxing roots. One practice that was quickly disseminated in Uganda is the pruning of plants six days prior to harvesting roots, which provides protection from PPD and makes roots sweeter.Cassava is widely used in processed foods, and RTB researchers have developed strategies for improving processing effi ciencies and using waste from processing plants in livestock feed, whereas a multi-country study of African consumer preferences for processed cassava products provided insights that can benefi t processors and widen smallholder access to those markets. While Bioversity and IITA have facilitated market opportunities for banana growers, CIP has helped smallholder potato and sweetpotato growers gain access to markets for French-fries and baked goods. In fact, CIP's promotion of sweetpotato purée as a substitute for fl our in baked goods was so successful in East Africa that the practice is currently being promoted in West Africa.RTB is working with local partners along the entire cooking banana value chain in Uganda -from the farm to the market -testing strategies to reduce postharvest loss and diff erentiate products in order to improve incomes and food security.Cooking banana is the main staple crop in Uganda, grown mostly by smallholders who eat about 60% of production and sell about 40%. The crop is an important source of income for farmers and other value chain actors, but a signifi cant portion of cooking banana production is lost or damaged due to the fruit's short shelf life and poor handling.A team of researchers from Bioversity, CIRAD, IITA and Uganda's National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO) is working with farmers, transporters, vendors and exporters in Central and Western Uganda on ways to reduce loss and increase the earnings of smallholders and cooking banana sellers -most of who are women. The collaboration is one of four subprojects under 'Expanding Utilization of RTB and Reducing Their Postharvest Losses' (RTB-ENDURE), a threeyear (2014-2016) initiative working with banana, cassava, potato and sweetpotato in Uganda, funded by the European Union and the International Fund for Agricultural Development.According to Diego Naziri, value chain expert and RTB-ENDURE project coordinator, the cooking banana research team has worked with farmers and transporters to decrease postharvest loss while testing ways for retailers to increase their earnings from cooking banana. He noted that a 2015 market study showed that women are disproportionately aff ected by postharvest loss, because they are largely responsible for retailing the crop and frequently have to sell damaged bananas for low prices. He added that women vendors earn smaller margins than middlemen and transporters.Because losses are highest during peak harvest, when the banana supply surpasses demand, RTB researchers are testing staggered planting systems, with 266 farmers trained in staggered planting in 2015. They also identifi ed cooking banana varieties that produce robust fruit with a longer shelf life that is less sus-ceptible to damage. Although there is market demand for these kinds of varieties, few farmers grow them. The RTB-ENDURE banana team worked with smallholders to select four such varieties for planting and provided training in macro-propagation of planting material and better agronomic practices to boost farm production.Bioversity researcher Enoch Kikulwe, the banana subproject coordinator, explained that farmer groups built macro-propagation chambers where clean planting material for the selected varieties provided by NARO is multiplied for distribution to smallholders. He cited the example of a group of women in Lwakalolo Parish, in Ddwaniro Sub-County, who also use their macro-propagation chamber for training other farmers. Researchers also helped farmers establish 10 mother gardens -four of which are managed by women -where they grow the new varieties. At the same time, CIRAD researcher Christophe Bugaud is trying to determine the best harvesting times for desired postharvest properties, combining sums concept, potential storage and sensory evaluation of fruit.RTB researchers are also testing ways to increase retail margins by diversifying the way cooking bananas are sold, such as by breaking bunches into smaller units (clusters, fi ngers or peeled bananas) that are sorted, graded, and labeled by cultivar. The banana team provided business training to two women who recently moved into wholesale -an activity dominated by men -and helped them gain access to credit, markets in Kampala and banana exporters as part of a strategy to promote women's participation in market-chain links with higher margins.\"When value chains improve, men often supplant women, but we're trying to avoid this, \" said Naziri, who added that gender was integrated into the participatory market chain approach used for all subprojects.Kikulwe explained that the women the project has helped move into wholesale will purchase the bananas with longer shelf life from participating farmers, which should improve smallholder incomes while reducing the risk of fruit loss for the wholesalers and vendors they sell to. This and other innovations facilitated by RTB-ENDURE have the potential to be scaled out within Uganda and beyond. S.QUINN/CIP Much of the cassava grown in developing countries is processed to produce starch or fl our used as ingredients in an array of food products. As demand for those products grows, the cassava processing industry will play an increasingly important role for farmers and local economies. RTB has consequently supported research to help starch and fl our producers become more effi cient.In many countries, processing is primarily done by small-and medium-scale operations, which frequently suff er ineffi ciencies -particularly in energy use -that negatively aff ect their profi tability and the environment. A cross-center team of researchers studied cassava processing operations in several countries to identify problems and measures that could be taken to correct them. Their research resulted in guidelines to improve the effi ciency of small-and medium-sized processing enterprises, which can in turn ensure higher, stable prices for the smallholders who supply them.The study was conducted by a team of researchers from CIAT, CIRAD and IITA, with support from Univalle and Clayuca in Colombia, Kasetsart University and KMUTT in Thailand, and Thai Nguyen University in Vietnam. The cooperation of industrial partners such as Niji Lukas (Nigeria), Ukaya Farms (Tanzania), Almidones de Sucre (Colombia), CODIPSA (Paraguay) was also essential.The team determined that because artifi cial drying is faster than sun drying, it can be a key factor for increasing production capacity. However, artifi cial drying consumes 70%-75% of the total energy used by a typical cassava starch/fl our factory, which means that ineffi ciencies in the drying process can signifi cantly increase production costs. They determined that 'fl ash drying' is one of the most suitable technologies for the production of cassava starch or fl our, and that large-scale fl ash dryers (200-300 tons of product/day) are highly energy effi cient. However, on a small scale (< 50 tons of product/day), fl ash-dryer energy effi ciency is only 40-60%, due to inadequate dryer designs.The researchers developed a numerical model to simulate fl ash drying at both small and large scales and investigated ways to improve energy effi ciency. Using computer simulations coupled with multi-objective optimization methods, they determined the optimal fl ash dryer dimensions and operating conditions for diff erent production capacities. They then developed guidelines for the design of energy-effi cient fl ash dryers.Improving cassava processing: less energy, higher effi ciency and more stable prices In Africa, cassava is commonly transformed into products ranging from traditional foods such as gari to fl our or starch for food industries. Yet little is known about which varieties and processes result in cassava products that consumers prefer. In an eff ort to strengthen local processing and widen or facilitate smallholder access to the markets it creates, a collaborative initiative by CIAT, CIRAD, IITA, Natural Resources Institute (NRI) and national partners assessed consumer preferences and gender diff erences in the perception of cassava product quality in fi ve countries.Teams in Benin, Cameroon, Nigeria, Sierra Leone and Tanzania completed questionnaire-based surveys to assess the preferences of hundreds of consumers using samples of gari, fufu or ugali, documenting pronounced gender diff erences in preferences. Physico-chemical analyses of those samples and fresh roots were completed by CIRAD, CIAT and NRI. Processing enterprises and breeding programs can use the resulting data to improve fi nal products and processes and contribute to improved livelihoods along cassava value chains.Those guidelines and research fi ndings were shared with key stakeholders from the private and public sector at a workshop in Bangkok, Thailand in December 2015. Workshop participants included representatives of cassava processing factories, equipment manufacturers, universities and government agencies from Thailand, Vietnam, Myanmar, Indonesia, Philippines, Colombia, Nigeria, Tanzania, France and Germany.Engineers at the Colombian university Univalle are using the guidelines to produce blueprints for an energy-effi cient, small-scale fl ash dryer, a prototype of which is slated to be built in 2016. Other organizations in Indonesia, Myanmar and South Africa have also expressed interest in energy-effi cient, small-scale fl ash dryers. The researchers will continue to share their fi ndings at events in Africa and Latin America.Cassava peels discarded during processing -approximately 20% of root weight -constitute an environmental hazard and a huge loss of value. RTB partnered with the CGIAR Research Programs Humidtropics, and Livestock and Fish to develop a technology for turning cassava waste into a dried, high-quality cassava peel (HQCP) mash that can be used in livestock feed mixtures -a breakthrough that will improve profi tability and create jobs.Multiple centers collaborated to develop a quick and cost-eff ective technology, while researchers estimated the product's nutritional value and expected price: approximately half the cost of maize. Feed millers found that the HQCP mash is a suitable substitute for 15% of maize in livestock feed and fi nanced feeding trials with chicken and sheep that produced encouraging results. With 14 million tons of cassava peels discarded annually in Nigeria alone, the transformation of that waste into animal feed could reduce maize imports, generate profi ts and employment, and reduce pollution.An assessment of a CIP-coordinated, public-private venture in Rwanda that launched the Golden Power Biscuit and other baked products made with vitamin A-rich orange-fleshed sweetpotato (OFSP) purée found that the venture improved the earnings of both the company that produces the snacks and the smallholders who supply it with sweetpotato roots -especially women.The 516 households that supply sweetpotato to the food company Urwibutso Enterprises also sell about a third of their crop on local markets and consume about a third. Endline studies showed that households with women as principal growers produced more sweetpotato than households with men as principal growers, sold more of their harvests to Urwibutso, and earned more from those sales: on average US $277 per household compared to US $143. Urwibutso earned US $403,599 from the sale of OFSP baked goods in 2015, so those farmers should have a reliable market for their sweetpotato in the future.Women benefi t from public private partnership for sweetpotato biscuits The distribution of budget by funding sources between 2012 and 2015 shows a changing contribution of W1 and W2 to the RTB annual budget. While in 2012 the share of W1 and W2 was 44%, this fell to 28% in 2015 -with a respective increase in W3 and bilateral funds, from 56% to 72%, in the same period. • Bilateral funds are contracts directly signed between a center and a donor and mapped into RTB.RTB total expenditure across all funding sources in 2015 was US$72.2M. This represents execution of 92% of the budget: US$20.4M were spent from W1 and W2, and US$51.8M from W3, bilateral and center funds.Expenditure for gender research was US$4.4M (94% of gender budget execution), representing 6% of RTB total expenditure in 2015. Management expenditure of US$1.5M represents 2% of the RTB total expenditure (74% of management budget execution), similar to 2014. ","tokenCount":"9541"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1402691024.json b/data/part_2/1402691024.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6a59ad064ba91d0068455b3cdb4123845d4276d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1402691024.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"9c723c36ab8bc32268a93fa97393a73e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/0d4a218f-a035-42d4-ad65-704965c8010c/retrieve","id":"2137663344"},"keywords":["community seed banks","farmer\"s rights","policy"],"sieverID":"563b07cc-80ff-4fde-9312-bda5c7dda898","pagecount":"9","content":"The paper interrogates the role of community seed banks (CSBs) and related initiatives in the realization of farmers\" rights in Uganda and the policy and legislative space for the functioning of CSBs. The study finds that although community seed banks are a relatively new phenomenon in Uganda, there have been community based seed banking initiatives that have been instrumental in the realization of farmers\" rights to save and exchange seed and information; and especially providing a wide range of diversity of seed to farmers and improving access to good quality seed. Through partnerships with local Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), research and government institutions, CSBs have received technical and financial support for conservation and seed production activities, thus enabling them to participate in seed value-chains through production of quality declared seed (QDS) and participate in decision making. Although the policy and legal environment for the functioning of CSBs is not well defined, various pieces of draft legislation provide positively for ways through which CSBs can be recognized and supported for the benefit of farmers. The study recommends that CSBs activities should be rolled-out to other parts of the country through a government financing mechanism that is suggested in the draft national policy on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. The development of a policy and legal environment that includes an act that has provisions for the recognition of CSBs and the protection of farmers\" rights is important. Secondary information, interviews with key informants and Focus Group discussions (FGDs) are the primary sources of data used.Farmers\" rights were first developed in the 1980\"s primarily to secure recognition of their role in the conservation and continuing development of local plant varieties; and to protect their rights to these varieties i.e. to save, sell and exchange seeds from their harvest (farmers\" privilege) (ACIPA 2014). Ultimately, they were developed as a means to minimize the impact of plant breeder\"s rights on local farmers. These rights are enshrined in a variety of legal instruments regulating access to and use of genetic resources and traditional knowledge. The recognition of the rights of farmers is important not only to their local seed varieties but also to their lands, resources, traditional knowledge and self-determination. Although the global seed industry has grown exponentially in the last three decades, most farmers in developing countries still rely on farm saved seeds accounting for about 70-80 percent of all seed used by farmers (Louwaars & de Boef 2012). The availability, accessibility and reliability of farm saved seed is therefore crucial for poor farmers to be able to attain food and nutrition security. Community seed banks and other local seed initiatives provide a robust system both in terms of locally-adapted seeds, diversity of crops and strengthened local institutions that ensure accessibility of seed by poor farmers (Development Fund, 2011).A study of community seed banks in Honduras, India, Zimbabwe, Costa Rica, Ethiopia, Nepal, and Zambia found that although community seed banks are crucial for seed and food security, most of the community seed banks are local initiatives operating within the domain of informal seed systems and hence not linked to or supported by governments. Community seed banking faces challenges including lack of legal frameworks and institutional support as well as the presence of restrictive seed laws (Development Fund, 2011). The international treaty for Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) allows governments, gene banks and agricultural research centers to pool their genetic resources and share the benefits arising from their use e.g through breeding. This enhances the protection and use of genetic material; and giving fair recognition and benefits to local farmers who hold and conserve local genetic material. However, in most countries the treaty is not yet implemented and there are no legal or policy frameworks through which CSBs and other local initiatives can function (FAO, 2014).Like most African countries, the seed industry in Uganda consists of two distinct systems: the informal sector and the formal sector. The informal sector broadly refers to the system where farmers produce, obtain, maintain, develop and distribute seed resources, from one growing season to the next. It is also diverse with many local indigenous varieties managed by farmers (Louwaars & de Boef, 2012). Majority of smallholder farmers in Uganda lack a sustainable and reliable seed supply system to ensure quality agricultural production and productivity (The African Seed Access Index (TASAI), 2015). 80 per cent of seed used by Ugandan farmers is obtained locally through own saved seed; exchange with neighbours; community seed banks; custodian farmers; and from the local markets (Otieno et al, 2016). Local seed systems therefore play an important role in providing diverse seed to farmers.Community seed banks and other local seed production initiatives have recently emerged in Uganda as a means of providing smallholders with a wide range of diversity and improving access to seed. 13 local community initiatives have been identified in various parts of the country. Most of them are performing the function of conserving local genetic resources and providing diversity in local seed systems. Additionally, some CSBs have also become seed production enterprises, they produce quality declared seed (QDS) for sale within the local communities. They are also serving to preserve indigenous knowledge and contributing to the realization of farmers\" rights.CSBs operate within the domain of informal seed systems which are unregulated and unsupported by any government programmes or policies. They govern themselves through informal by-laws and are mostly supported by local NGOs. Furthermore, the contribution of community seed banks to the realization of farmers\" rights is not properly understood or documented in Uganda and this contributes to their lack of support or recognition.This paper answers three pertinent questions with regard to the role of community seed banks in the protection and promotion of farmers\" rights. First the paper interrogates the practical ways that community seed banks in Uganda contribute to the implementation of farmers\" rights while identifying gaps and constraints in their functioning. The paper then interrogates the policy and regulatory environment for the functioning of community seed banks which include access to and benefit sharing, seed laws and plant variety protection. Finally, the paper identifies the public policy interventions that are supporting the operations of community seed banks and the policy instruments that could be put in place, to create incentives for community seed banks to maintain crop diversity and to remain viable. This paper relies on primary and secondary data obtained through FGDs, key informant interviews and literature. A review of related literature on community seed banks and farmers\" rights provides the contextual framework for the paper; an overview of CSBs in Uganda provides an understanding of their evolution and functioning within the system. Further, this paper analyses the primary data collected in the course of the last two years working with various community seed banks. And finally, this The paper also reviews policies, laws and regulations in the agricultural sector to determine whether there are provisions that promote CSBs and protect farmers\" rights and related local indigenous knowledge.Community seed banks range from a single farm family seed bank to a community level seed bank. They could deal with local landraces, introduced landraces or improved cultivars (Lewis and Mulvany 1997;Lipper et al. 2010;the Development Fund 2011). CSBs are defined as a community driven and community-owned effort to conserve and use both local and improved varieties for food security and to improve the livelihoods of farmers (Sthapit, 2015;Vernooy et al, 2015).Three types of community seed banks can be identified: i) community gene bank (solely conservation of local varieties as PGR in small quantities), ii) community seed bank (solely concerned with access and availability of cultivars) and iii) community gene cum seed bank (carries out functions of both (i) and (ii)) (Sthapit, 2015). Seed banks can be used as a platform for community institutions to strengthen the roles of the farmer seed systems.Purposes of community seed banks are not only saving and exchanging local seeds but also keeping them under the control of the farming community for easy access and use and to ensure seed security at the community level. Institutionally, CSBs also perform the roles of consolidating and promoting conservation, sustainable use and improvement of important local genetic resources / traditional knowledge within communities (Sthapit, 2015;Vernooy et al, 2015).CSBs are supported by a community-led seed management approach that includes production, collection, processing, storage, distribution (exchange, loan, grant, selling); and marketing of local as well as improved varieties. Sthapit et al. (2008b) defined a community seed bank as a community managed ex situ collection designed to enhance access to local varieties and associated knowledge for the benefits of the community. In other words, a community-operated seed bank provides farmers access to seeds of local crop varieties and performs the function of community level backup of genetic resources, a repository of associated knowledge, and an institution to organize, mobilize and represent farmers\" interests.Article 9 of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) recognizes the important contribution of farmers in the management, development and conservation of genetic diversity in-situ and their contribution in global food production. Article 9 recognizes that realizing farmers\" rights is a means for halting genetic erosion and ensuring present and future and nutrition food security but also ensuring that farmers accrue benefits from the resources which they continue to maintain. The contracting parties agree that the responsibility for realizing farmers\" rights as they relate to PGRFA rests with national governments and in accordance with their needs and priorities.There are four key tenets of article 9 namely: Art 9.2a, protection of traditional knowledge relevant to plant genetic resources for food and agriculture; Art 9.2b, the right to equitably participate in sharing benefits arising from the utilization of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture; Art 9.2c, the right to participate in making decisions, at the national level, on matters related to the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture; Art 9.3, right to save, use, exchange and sell farm-saved seed/propagating material.And additionally, the role of farmer\"s organizations and civil society in realizing farmers\" rights.In Uganda indigenous knowledge has been passed down from generation to generation among culturally diverse ethnic groups consisting of over 52 ethnic groups with diverse indigenous knowledge systems which have been applied in the careful selection, development and conservation of PGRFA. These generations fostered relationships with other groups, creating a complex web of high levels of cooperation, exchange and support that are essential for sustainability of PGRFA. Their fast erosion due to internal and external factors poses a serious threat to PGRFA in the region. Furthermore, indigenous knowledge used in the management of PGRFA is mostly held by women. Protecting this indigenous knowledge is paramount to realizing not only the rights of farmers but also the rights of women.In the past few years the relevance and importance of CSBs has gained international recognition. A community seed bank is part of a system of community managed genetic resources. The seed bank is at the center of the seed network and offers various community services such as seed security (storage), seed distribution and exchange, germplasm restoration and introduction (Regasa Feyisa, 2000). CSBs are both ex-situ and in-situ initiatives combining on site management of genetic resources in a gene bank and on farm restoration and maintenance of biodiversity (Vernooy et al, 2015). CSBs play a key role in the development promotion and conservation of famers\" agro-biodiversity; providing access to seeds for farmers and maintaining genetic diversity in farmers\" fields (Regasa Feyisa, 2000). In-situ conservation of local varieties held by CSBs that have undergone years of adaptation could have a positive impact on adaptation to climate change in communities and subsequently on food security and livelihoods (FAO, 2010). Furthermore, many species are still being managed by local communities that use traditional indigenous knowledge (passed on from generation to generation) in the selection, preservation and management of these seeds. This knowledge requires protection (Vernooy et al, 2015).Farmers\" rights have been endorsed as rights originating from the past, present and future contributions of farmers to conserving, developing and making available plant genetic resources for food and agriculture and therefore recognizing their need to benefit fully from the natural resources they have continued to conserve (Santili, 2012). Article 9 of the ITPGRFA recognizes that responsibility for undertaking farmers\" rights rests with the national governments and calls on contracting parties to \"take appropriate measures\" to protect and promote farmers\" rights. In this context the scope 1 of farmers\" rights include the protection of traditional knowledge relevant to PGRFA; the rights to equitable sharing of resources accruing from the use of PGRFA and the right for participation in decisions regarding the sustainable use, management and conservation of their PGRFA, but with a requirement that national governments ensure that farmers\" rights are protected through appropriate legislation.Community seed banks ensure farmers\" rights are protected through their function of providing access to a variety of diverse seed to farmers; through protecting their local indigenous knowledge which is often un-documented. Through seed fairs and other community level interventions CSBs are also able to provide information on a portfolio of varieties and crops they have (Clancy et al, 2016). By ensuring that materials they have are conserved and adapted to the impact of climate change, CSBs also help to ensure that farmers have access to suitably adaptable material that they can use to tackle climate change. Other ways of ensuring farmers\" rights are protected are through Participatory Plant Breeding (PPBs) where some CSBs partner with breeder to do grassroots breeding or participatory varietal selection (PVS) and participatory varietal evaluation (PVE) (Clancy et al, 2016). These provide access to diverse seed; it also ensures that farmers participate in decisions that affect them at the community level.Authors (Santili, 2012, Bjonstard 2004) have pointed out contradictions between the recognition of farmers\" rights by the ITPRGFA\"s preamble and the requirement that the responsibility of ensuring farmers\" rights rest with national governments, and that the treaty does not establish international parameters by which farmers\" rights can be guided and hence no minimum international standards. As a result, achieving a balance between national legislation and international requirements is still a challenge for many countries. Other international legislation such as WTO\"s TRIPS Agreement which stipulates that countries provide for protection of plant varieties through patents or a \"sui generis\" system or both; and the Plant breeders\" rights under UPOV have tended to undermine farmers\" rights to save exchange, use and sell farm saved seeds for IP protected plant varieties (Bjorn, 2004). Furthermore, seed laws regulate the production, sale, marketing and distribution of seeds. In some cases, the seed laws may be stringent hence undermining farmers\" rights to save exchange and use farm saved seeds. As such, the issue of protecting and promoting farmers\" rights is still not adequately confronted by international legal and policy instruments.The study uses a number of secondary literature to provide the basis and conceptual framework for the analysis of community seed banks and farmers\" rights as presented in the preceding section. The study also relies upon a census on community seed banks and community seed initiatives carried out in 2015 in Uganda. The census reveals a total of 13 community seed banks and related inititatives. 13 key informants in the respective CSBs are interviewed to provide information about their roles and activities as related to seed production and dissemination; the number of crops and varieties they conserve or share in their community seed banks; the number of farmers benefiting from the initiatives; and the partnerships they have and whether they receive any support from local NGOs and government.Policy documents related to farmers\" rights, seed policies and plant genetic resource management and conservation are also analyzed to provide insights into the provisions that support the realization of farmers\" rights or those that support the development of community seed banks. As such, a number of policies such as access and benefit sharing policies; the draft national seed policy; the draft national plant genetic resources policy; and the plant variety protection bill 2010, and act of 2014 are analyzed. The policy gaps are then identified and recommendations are made.A total of 15 farmer groups with seed banking initiatives; five located in south-western, three in northern, five in West Nile region and one from the eastern part of Uganda and one established in the Central region; were inventoried. In South Western Uganda, we interfaced with: Lwengo Community Genebank; Kagyera Bataka Community seed bank; Kiziba Community seed bank and Rubaya Warehouse group. In Northern Uganda: Jing Komi Group; Pagwari Farmers Association and Dok Gangber Group. In west Nile: Kuluba sub-county Mixed Farmers Association; Agremac Ojiebo Womens Group for Development; Watembo Wadelai Group Association; Binagoro Group and Andevuku Mixed Farm Group. Acan Pekun Akadikum Group is in Otuke district of Eastern Uganda. And in Central Uganda was the recently established Nakaseke CSB. Of these only six have some kind of full time community seed banking initiatives while others are community based seed production entities that also function as seed banks during periods of surplus seed production (see Appendix 1).The different initiatives surveyed were established for different purposes. Five of the thirteen groups were established out of the need to conserve different crop varieties and improve seed and food security, and livelihoods improvement. Four of the groups started on their own without any external support while others were established by either; International Non-Government Organizations, a Government Organization in partnership with an International Non-Government Organization and others by a Government Organization (Appendix 1). All groups were established to address issues that are affecting Ugandan farmers such as access to quality seed, timeliness, proximity and affordability of seed; need for a diverse portfolio diverse seed; providing seed that is resilient to climate and diseases; the need to be linked with seed markets; and finally conservation of local indigenous varieties and related traditional knowledge (see Appendix 1).The seed banks are managed by farmers themselves and are registered as Community based organizations (CBOs). Their operations are based on by-laws developed by beneficiary communities; hence trust and social capital form the core principles of their functioning and sustainability. The gene banks have management committees composed of the gene bank manager, records manager, distribution manager, quality assurance manager and community mobilizers. The management committees operate on a voluntary basis and are elected every two years. There is a lot of intraspecific and interspecific diversity of genetic resources for food and agriculture being held by the community groups ranging from 12 crops within a single CSB to 69 varieties of a single crop being held within a CSB. Appendix 1 summarizes the CSBs, the number of farmers they serve and the partnerships they have. Partnerships are mainly formed to facilitate seed production, conservation or preservation of local indigenous knowledge with national and international NGOs which offer technical and financial support; and with local seed companies which offer markets for the seed produced.Community seed banks in Uganda often hold seed fairs where they showcase their varieties. National Agricultural Research Organization\"s Plant Genetic Resources Centre (NARO-PGRC) which also hosts the national gene bank organizes seed fairs and exchange visits between farmer communities where they share, save and exchange seed and also share knowledge on seed production practices. In the past 5 years, 4 seed fairs have been held with 4 farmer communities from 4 agro-ecological zones exchanging good quality seed and knowledge for over 54 common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties, and other crops such as millet, maize, groundnuts and sorghum, all of which contrinbute immensely to food and nutrition security. NARO-PGRC has also helped the CSBs develop community biodiversity registers and bean catalogues which have been published and distributed to other farmers during the seed fairs. The catalogues specifically contain the description of the varieties of beans held by the CSBs, the local name, the colour and appearance, the morphological characteristics, and the uses within the community. Through diversity fairs, farmers have ably communicated to a wider range of stakeholders on the importance of crop intra-specific diversity to food security, agricultural research and development for resilient seed systems.Community seed banks are also invited to the annual world food day where the International community and National governments reflect on issues of food security, hunger, malnutrition, climate change and poverty. In Uganda three community seed banks from Nakaseke, Rubaya and Sheema districts have for the past three years participated and show-cased their varieties and catalogues for beans to a wide range of stakeholders which comprise of Ministry of agriculture, National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO), FAO, international and local NGOs, members of the diplomatic corps, academia and the media among others. This opportunity has not only been an avenue for creating awareness on community seed banks but also to share information and allow farmers to participate in important decisions that affect seed and food security.The 3 CSBs in Nakaseke, Sheema and Rubaya, have partnerships with NARO-PGRC and Bioversity International which have supported them financially through the construction of the structures for the seed banks; and have also provided technical support for the management of the CSBs and the production of good quality seed. Recently the CSB in Sheema has also been trained by seed inspectors from the seed Inspection and Verification department of the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries (MAAIF) to produce quality declared seed (QDS) of 7 popular varieties of beans which they are now selling within the district of Sheema. The NARO-PGRC\"s gene bank also acts as a repository where farmers deposit local varieties which they hold in their CSBs for safe keeping in duplicates. This material is only made available through informed consent by communities for inclusion as voluntary contributions to the multilateral system (MLS). NARO-PGRC has also provided \"lost\" varieties from the national gene bank for restoration and re-introduction to the communities. So far 23 varieties of beans were re-introduced to the CSB in Sheema in 2010, 12 varieties to Nakaseke in 2014 and 11 varieties to Rubaya CSB in 2015.There are also a number of NGOs working with community seed banks to provide technical, financial and social support not only for their establishment but also for their sustainability. For example, 6 community seed bank initiatives namely Lwengo group, Watembo group, Andevuku group, Rubaya group and Dok ganger have been supported financially by local NGOs for their establishment and other technical issues regarding their management.The National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) which is a government agency responsible for extension and outreach to farmers has also supported the establishment of two community seed initiatives namely Pagwari group and Binagoro group whose main objective was initially to have seed multiplication within the communities, but have now become quasi community seed banks where farmers can access good quality seed. To this end, NAADS has provided financial support and trained farmers in production of good quality seed and distributed improved seed to farmers in those communities. This has had positive outcome of achieving seed and food security; improving incomes and livelihoods of farmers; and enhancing access to improved and diverse seed varieties. 5. Policy Environment for Farmers\" Rights: What\"s in it for Ugandan CSBs?The national regulations on ABS were formulated in March 2005 in line with Article 15 of the CBD on Access to Genetic Resources and as a result, ABS guidelines were published in 2007. These regulations do not apply where the exchanges are among local communities for their own consumption; or if the material is used for local research or breeding purposes by national government operated academic or research centers. Uganda acceded to the International Treaty for Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) in 2003. Under the ITPGRFA, the Multilateral System (MLS) of access and benefit sharing allows for the free exchange of materials that are automatically in the MLS which includes a list of 64 crops of materials held by public institutions such as national gene banks and national research centers. Materials held by community seed banks are therefore not automatically in the multilateral system of access and benefit sharing and therefore subject to CBD-Nagoya protocol rules for access. Farmers within the country are however free to access and exchange genetic resources within their communities and among themselves.Uganda\"s 2007 guidelines on ABS require that before one is given an Access Permit to access genetic resources held by communities, the person, group or association intending to access the genetic resources must obtain a Prior Informed Consent (PIC) and an Accessory Agreement with the community under Mutually Agreed Terms (MAT). The applicants then need to obtain a valid access permit from the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST) which is the competent authority in order to take the materials to Rwanda (Appendix 1 below). In accordance to Ugandan ABS Laws, the MTA must outline the benefits to be shared and include these in the agreement including expected technology transfer. According to article 5.4 of the guideline mechanisms for sharing benefits must be under Mutually Agreed Terms (MAT) and concluded with beneficiaries in advance prior to accessing the genetic resources. The issue is further complicated by UNCST\"s requirements for an export permit from CITES management authority and an issuance of a certificate of origin by the ministry of Tourism. Experts from NEMA indicate that the average time for this process ranges between 12-18 months and can even go upto 2 years depending on the process of negotiations.Although the national gene bank (NARO-PGRC) stores farmers\" varieties in duplicates, this material is in \"black boxes\" and not accessible under the MLS. NARO-PGRC is technical advisory only for PGRFA, and responsible for PGRFA that is in the Multilateral system. In this case the negotiations for accessing the PGRFA from these CSBs are still done through the Nagoya protocol. The country is also in the process of developing guidelines for ABS under the ITPGRFA in harmony with the provisions of the CBD and Nagoya Protocol, a ministerial order was issued and a committee set to provide modalities for harmonizing ABS laws under NP and ITPGRFA and strengthening institutional arrangements for their implementation.Uganda has also developed a draft national policy on Genetic resources for Food and Agriculture but this still awaits tabling through cabinet and parliament.. Under the Draft National PGRFA policy 2015, Policy statement and strategy 3.6.1, 3.6.4 and 3.6.5 provide for the establishment of CBS, support of Community management of PGR and farmers\" rights respectively. The Draft National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2012, target 4.5, provides for efficient implementation of the MLS through; putting in place mechanisms for sharing the benefits from access of PGR; documentation of indigenous knowledge, innovations and practices in PGR and support of community based PGR management initiatives in various parts of the country, and these include CSBs.The Draft National seed policy 2014, section 3.2 provides for conservation of PGR and specially establishment of CBS, Section 3.3 (Objective 2) also provides for increased availability and access to quality seed of preferred varieties to complement those produced under the formal seed system, among others.Currently Uganda does not have a farmers\" rights law or any other document addressing farmers\" rights however the draft national PGRFA policy and strategy states that as part of the new developments in the establishment of appropriate legislation for the management of PGRFA, a traditional varieties protection act will be developed to provide protection for materials held by CSBs. In providing this protection some core elements of farmers\" rights will be protected or realized.Enacted in 2010, the bill seeks to recognize and protect the rights of breeders over plant varieties protected by them. It also promotes the use of appropriate mechanisms for fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from use of plant varieties, knowledge and technologies and institutions for the protection of breeders\" rights. However, the bill does not have any clauses protecting farmers\" rights, indigenous knowledge, or the rights to save, exchange use and sell farm-saved seed, it is also silent on communities\" rights. In fact, the bill specifically states that \"the act does not affect the traditional methods of access, use or exchange of knowledge, technologies and plant varieties by local and between local communities\". Thus by only granting IPRs to breeders, efforts by CSBs is diminished especially with respect to increasing access to seed and sharing benefits arising from PGRFA. There are certain exemptions in the plant breeders\" rights which allow for the exchange of seed among farmers only for purposes other than commercial, such as for food production. Farmers are not allowed to sell farm saved seed. This limits the freedom of CSBs to exchange and sell seed. And recently, stakeholders have suggested the development of another act to protect the rights of farmers\" and their traditional knowledge, this is still under development.This paper purposed to explore: the role of community seed banks in the realization of and promotion of farmers\" rights in Uganda and to interrogate the policy environment for CSBs to operate in Uganda. The study results indicate that although community seed banks are a relatively new phenomenon in the country, they are helping to realize farmers\" rights in many ways. CSBs in Uganda are helping communities to conserve and manage their genetic resources while at the same time exchanging seed and sharing the diversity and information they have among Ugandan farmers. CSBs have contributed to the documentation and protection of local indigenous knowledge. Through the support of research and local NGOs the CSBs have enabled farmers to participate in decision making specifically with respect to the way their genetic resources are conserved in situ and at the national genebank and the way these materials are availed to the communities when they need them. In the face of climate change CSBs have also played a critical role in facilitating participatory varietal selection, conserving and making available genetic resources that are adapted to climate change thus contributing immensely towards the communities\" productivity and food security.An analysis of policy space reveals that community seed banking is not well provided for in most national laws and policies relating to the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic diversity, or access and benefit sharing. However, key draft National policies and laws relating to Seed, PGR conservation and Utilization, Plant variety Protection and interim provisions for streamlining access and benefit sharing of PGRFA in Uganda do create some space for their recognition and protection; and for documentation of indigenous knowledge. benefit CSBs. The Draft National PGRFA policy recognizes the important role that CSBs play in-situ conservation strategies and proposes the support of CSBs technically and financially through a fund. Furthermore, the PVP act 2014 also provides for gazetting PGR centres and establishment of a Gene fund that can also be used to support conservation and PGR management initiatives done by CSBs.The above mentioned draft instruments fully recognize farmers\" rights to good quality diverse seeds for food security and livelihood improvement. They also acknowledge community seed banking as an effectively functioning linkage to provide for the implementation of the laws and policy provisions on farmers\" rights. Once approved and fully implemented, community seed banking will be a nodal link to foster, farmers\" rights advocacy, recognition and protection. The draft national PGRFA policy specifically proposes that a fund be set up to support in-situ conservation activities and this will ensure the sustainability of the CSBs. NARO-PGRC and other partners are using this platform to ensure National support for CBS is institutionalized and funded.Finally, as a way forward; more community seed banks should be established and existing ones supported as part of the process of realizing farmers\" rights in Uganda and fulfilling obligations of the plant treaty specifically with respect to access and benefit sharing and realization of farmers\" rights. The community seed banks\" activities should also be integrated in wider programmes and activities related to conservation and variety development i.e by linking to the national gene bank for in-situ ex situ complementarities in conservation; or linked to breeding programmes for development of new varieties through participatory varietal development. Community seed banks also need to be included in climate change adaptation programmes as they are able to help communities build their resilience by providing suitably adapted seed and contribute largely to food security. The development of the traditional varieties act which is on-going should include substantial elements of farmers\" rights and the recognition and support ie technical and financial of CSBs towards realizing these rights.","tokenCount":"5382"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1409369085.json b/data/part_2/1409369085.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..01bd3178620c12c73f5e51fbead96425c23c8828 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1409369085.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"55dc848dbdded7b777425840e6db1135","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/1f9cc8d0-0303-475a-93da-0c2323dcedb3/retrieve","id":"-89832311"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"f3c61e5d-ea31-4914-a840-3e8fbde2540e","pagecount":"10","content":"The convergence of the biodiversity and climate crises, widening of wealth inequality, and most recently the COVID-19 pandemic underscore the urgent need to mobilize change to secure sustainable futures. Centres of tropical biodiversity are a major focus of conservation efforts, delivered in predominantly site-level interventions often incorporating alternative-livelihood provision or poverty-alleviation components. Yet, a focus on site-level intervention is ill-equipped to address the disproportionate role of (often distant) wealth in biodiversity collapse. Further these approaches often attempt to 'resolve' local economic poverty in order to safeguard biodiversity in a seemingly virtuous act, potentially overlooking local communities as the living locus of solutions to the biodiversity crisis. We offer Connected Conservation: a dual-branched conservation model that commands novel actions to tackle distant wealth-related drivers of biodiversity decline, while enhancing site-level conservation to empower biodiversity stewards. We synthesize diverse literatures to outline the need for this shift in conservation practice. We identify three dominant negative flows arising in centres of wealth that disproportionately undermine biodiversity, and highlight the three key positive, though marginalized, flows that enhance biodiversity and exist within biocultural centres. Connected Conservation works to amplify the positive flows, and diminish the negative flows, and thereby orientates towards desired states with justice at the centre. We identify connected conservation actions that can be applied and replicated to address the telecoupled, wealth-related reality ofbiodiversity collapse while empowering contemporary biodiversity stewards. The approach calls for conservation to extend its collaborations across sectors in order to deliver to transformative change.The convergence of the biodiversity and climate crises, widening of wealth inequality, and most recently the COVID-19 pandemic underscore the urgent need to mobilize change to secure sustainable futures (Brondizio et al., 2019;Daszak et al., 2020;Pörtner et al., 2021). In contrast to conventional conservation that tends to focus on site-based intervention often in combination with local poverty alleviation goals, or incorporates market-based fixes that further commoditise nature, we call for a 'Connected Conservation'. This new conservation approach challenges conservation to target wealth accumulation as the key factor driving environmental degradation, albeit in 'distant' geographies. Further, it enhances conventional site-level conservation by working to amplify the contributions of indigenous and local communities to conservationnot just locally -in the management of their immediate environments, but also through enhancing the potential for feedbacks that serve to redefine common visions of prosperity, and cultivate positive human-to-human and human-to-nature values in society at large. Such a dual-armed approach is now essential to addressing the \"global interconnectivity\" that threatens biodiversity (Lenzen et al., 2012;Liu et al., 2013) and achieving the \"urgent policy action […] required to transform economic, social and financial models\" (CBD, 2021) in socially just, equitable and decolonial ways. This policy analysis synthesizes across broad literatures, to offer the conservation, policy and practice communities a concise account of some of the challenges facing contemporary conservation, and how Connected Conservation can overcome them.Despite increasing recognition of a new age of telecoupling, in which rising urban living and consumption-heavy lifestyles are disproportionately driving biodiversity decline in tropical forest landscapes (Brondizio et al., 2019;Almond et al., 2020;Dasgupta, 2020), the largely western 'conservation movement' (Pascual et al., 2021) remains dominated by local interventions and site-level protection or restoration, rather than actions focused on wealthy centres. For example, contemporary protection-centred interventions--e.g. Half Earth, '30 by 30' -advocate for extensive protected areas within hyperdiverse regions, rather than actions targeting distant drivers (Wilson, 2016;Waldron et al., 2020). Contemporary conservation thereby unduly exonerates those actors in centres of wealth and consumption who are most responsible for the biodiversity crisis, propagates the white-saviour colonial conservation style (Rudd et al., 2021), forfeits the opportunity of learning from contemporary biodiversity stewards, and ultimately fails conservation and its justice dimensions (Gordon et al., 2010;Díaz et al., 2019).Here we outline Connected Conservation -based around two foci: (1) a new, challenging, and disruptive branch of telecoupled conservation that uses novel tools to make visible, and new actions to tackle, systemic and often 'off-stage' (mostly distant and diffuse) (Pascual et al., 2017b) causes of biodiversity loss and (2) collaborative conservation -an enhanced form of existing site-level intervention that amplifies the longstanding contribution of local populations to conservation (Garnett et al., 2018). We then identify concrete actions towards this new, transformative and expanded Connected Conservation agenda.The failure to address the 'distant' drivers of biodiversity decline can undermine conservation in two important ways: by shirking the centrality of financial wealth and by passing-up on the opportunity of collaborating with, championing and learning from, biodiversity stewards.Narratives that uncritically blame or implicitly associate poor people at the site-level with biodiversity loss evade the predominant role of wealth as a key driver of biodiversity decline (Fig. 1) (Otero et al., 2020). Yet distant wealth, not site-level cash poverty, is the dominant driver behind many of the major threats to biodiversity acting through three main flows: (i) trade, (ii) climate change and (iii) a dominant 'one-world development model' (Fig. 2). Each is expanded below.An immense amount of resource draining takes place from North to South in unequal exchange under the guise of trade (Hickel et al., 2022). Globalized commodity trade is often financed by destination countries and involves intentional cost-shifting to lower income regions (Pascual et al., 2017b), driving environmental and cultural harms in countries with abundant resources (Lenzen et al., 2012) (Fig. 1). Some examples include agricultural expansion (Ceddia, 2020;Rajão et al., 2020), deforestation (Pendrill et al., 2019;Hoang and Kanemoto, 2021), overfishing (Tickler et al., 2018;Sumaila et al., 2019) and illegal wildlife trade (Duffy, 2016;Dang Vu, 2021), all of which result in species extinctions, either directly (e.g. with threatened bird species (Marshall et al., 2020)) or, indirectly (e.g. via bycatch associated with illegal fishing gear (Jaramillo-Legorreta et al., 2019)). Pollution is driving biodiversity decline and change through fertilizer and pesticide run-off from intensive commodity production, largely for export (Clark et al., 2018). Demand for illegal drugs is also key; conservation interventions and local communities are undermined by weakened territorial control within source and transit countries (Wrathall et al., 2020).Tackling climate change is central to averting global biodiversity loss (Manes et al., 2021;Pörtner et al., 2021). Extreme climatic events such as flooding, droughts, heatwaves and fires are jeopardizing biodiversity in terrestrial, fresh-water, and marine systems (Barlow et al., 2018;França et al., 2020;Manes et al., 2021). Climate change impacts from greenhouse gas emissions have been primarily and historically produced in centres of wealth; though some tropical countries such as Brazil and Indonesia have a high historical contribution through land use change, much of this can be attributed to global trade and commodity demand, rather than domestic consumption (Evans, 2021).Nearly all countries define societal progress as dependent on continuous and limitless economic growth within capitalist economies. This ubiquitous 'One World' model of development (Escobar, 2015) underpins global trade and climate change impacts, thus making it a powerful underlying (indirect) driver of global declines in biological (Otero et al., 2020) and cultural diversity (biocultural diversity) (Maffi and Woodley, 2012). The One World development model propagates cultural norms and mental structures that protect and legitimize the associated interests of the wealthy, compel affluence through material and energy growth, commodification and individualization, and seek \"modernity as unending progress\" (Feola et al., 2021). Furthermore, financial wealth accumulation drives alienation, rootlessness and inequality, that further undermine conservation (Pickett and Wilkinson, 2010;Martin, 2020). This development paradigm is grounded on an extractive and rent-seeking economic model that places humans as dominators of an ever-extractable nature (Muradian and Pascual, 2018). As such, it legitimizes prevailing governance patterns based on competition rather than cooperation, which are supported by current global institutions determining national economic policies and regulations (Kothari et al., 2019). This in turn fuels an accelerated global material and energy metabolism that directly degrades ecosystems, homogenises cultural diversities, and contributes to climate change.All three negative flows from centres of wealth dominate, and extend beyond jurisdictional bordersor across markedly different sociocultural contexts within countriesin a process known as telecoupling (Liu et al., 2013). Conventional, largely site-level conservation, is inadequate for tackling these transboundary flows associated with global wealth drivers (Gordon et al., 2010;Friess et al., 2015;Díaz et al., 2019).In addition to circumventing the dominant role of distant drivers, the disproportionate focus on site-level conservation places the onus for change on socially and economically marginalized communities (Adams et al., 2004;Skutsch and Turnhout, 2020). These approaches often attempt to 'resolve' local economic poverty in order to safeguard biodiversity (Roe et al., 2015;Woodhouse et al., 2021), in a seemingly virtuous act delivered by the too-often white saviour, rather than question what constitutes 'poverty' and what enhances well-being in rural place-based communities (though methods exist for doing so, e.g. Llopis et al., 2019;Carmenta et al., 2022). Further introducing economic rewards, payments and incentives can perversely nudge local actors in to the supply chains that already drive deforestation and biodiversity loss, or overwrite values related to stewardship of nature (Ezzine- de-Blas et al., 2019;Otero et al., 2020). Crucially, such site-level conservation may overlook local communities as the living locus of solutions to the biodiversity crisis -evidence shows how low intensity anthromes overlap with land held and managed by Indigenous and traditional communities (Garnett et al., 2018). It thereby misses the opportunity of empowering those local biodiversity stewards and fails to engage, champion and learn from the local knowledge and cultural norms that have proven consonant with care for nature (Büscher and Fletcher, 2019). Meanwhile, wealth-related drivers, and sometimes conservation intervention itself, are debasing centres where biocultural diversity flourishes and undermining the capacity of local people to defend biodiversity (Temper et al., 2015;Duffy et al., 2019;MacGregor, 2020). In many places, cultural diversity has persistently been attenuated, subjugated and stigmatized by the dominant flows of trade, climate change and one-world development that arise from centres of financial wealth (Maffi and Woodley, 2012). Yet, these communities contribute to biological conservation through three central, albeit increasingly marginalized, flows: (i) local models of biocultural governance, (ii) diverse knowledge and (iii) plural values (Fig. 2). Each is elaborated below.In many places, local models of biocultural governance systems (including territorial governance) enable and allow local communities to survive and flourish (Stavenhagen, 2006). Even while being eroded, local governance is a counter-force to globalisation and stands in direct contrast to one world developmentunderpinned by the philosophy of community and commons (over individualism and private accumulation), attachment to place and territory, and small environmental footprints (Feola et al., 2021). For instance, community-based agroecological production is associated with resilience, provision of multiple ecosystem services and agro-biodiversity (Padoch and Pinedo-Vasquez, 2010;Tscharntke et al., 2012;Tamburini et al., 2020). Despite constant threat, indigenous people and local communities retain sufficient autonomy to hold roughly 67 % of the world's remotest land under customary systems of tenure and governance (Garnett et al., 2018). Further, much of this land represents \"intact forest\" landscapes that are often effectively conserved and are contemporary strongholds of biological and cultural diversity (Fa et al., 2020;Dawson et al., 2021).Diverse knowledge systems and understanding of people-nature relations support, and are maintained by, different ways of knowing and experiencing the world (Ingold, 2002;Maffi and Woodley, 2012). Traditional and local ecological knowledge plays an important role in structuring species composition, agro-biodiversity, sustainable resource use and land management and thus is highly relevant for conservation (Reyes-García and Benyei, 2019). Furthermore, there are strong associations between cultural and biological diversity leading to the observation that landscape homogenization (e.g. via monoculture expansion) leads to lost ways of knowing, or the 'homogenization of the mind' (Maffi and Woodley, 2012;Cámara-Leret and Bascompte, 2021).A large diversity of values about nature exist within and across societies (IPBES, 2022). Within such diversity, positive 'relational values' (Chan et al. 2016) that express integration with and stewardship of nature tend to be more prevalent in the rural and small-scale communities that conservation so often engages with (Agarwala et al., 2014). Moral, gift and solidarity economies have enabled the resilience and persistence of local communities, even while they negotiate their marginalized positions within dominant models of development and market exchange in order to maintain their own ways of living (from, with, in, and as) nature (Henrich et al., 2005;Adams et al., 2008;Hill et al., 2021). Further, diverse conceptions of living a good life likely also enhance our capacity to identify new, viable solutions and alternative developments not centred on affluence and wealth accumulation (Gómez-Baggethun et al., 2013;Leyva-Solano, 2019).Addressing biodiversity loss in an economically interconnected world challenges us to develop a revised model of conservation based on greater awareness of connections among actors, locations and disciplines. Our 'Connected Conservation' model (Fig. 2) targets the role of wealth in environmental health collapse and biodiversity loss, interrogates common views of what constitutes poverty and well-being, and disrupts the dominant flows marginalizing nature. Yet is also recognizes and supports and contributes to positive, local biocultural governance, practices and values. This process of deconstructing accepted norms and models, combined with articulating efficient alternatives, is deemed necessary for the emergence of new sustainable futures (Feola et al., 2021).Connected Conservation therefore requires two broad, ideally interconnected, sets of actions (Fig. 2): (1) telecoupled conservation actions that reduce and filter the dominant systemic flows of one-world development, climate change and trade from centres of wealth, and (2) collaborative conservation actions that enhance and amplify the positive yet marginalized forms of local governance, diverse knowledge systems and plural values of nature from bioculturally diverse regions. Connected Conservation thus recognizes and mobilises justice and diversity, making space for transformative conservation actions in a movement that pushes for change at different levels, unconstrained by colonial ideas and models of site-level conservation.In essence, Connected Conservation pursues desired states within which both biodiversity and humanity can flourish. As illustrated in Fig. 2, within centres of wealth the desired states uphold (i) accountable and regulated trade supported by (ii) gratification not growth, thereby leading to a reduced desire and demand for socio-environmentally harmful consumption. Within biocultural centres, Connected Conservation actions pursues (iii) local governance, rights and selfdetermination, and (iv) respect and learning from diverse knowledge and plural values.The actions Connected Conservation needs to progress towards these desired states are available within four interlinked and overarching levers (Independent group of Scientists, 2019): (i) Governance and Accountability (e.g. accessible, transparent, effective, fair and systemic); offers is conservation with justice at the centre, albeit while representing a great challenge to the networks and norms of contemporary conservation, pushing the conservation effort to connect across sectors to deliver.Novel conservation actions adequate for a telecoupled world will be the most transformative for the conservation agenda. A set of these must focus on reducing the negative flows from commodity and wildlife trade requiring regulations that allow for (a) internalising trade-related externalities and cost shifting to distant places-e.g. via commodity prices, (b) equitably safeguarding the value chain by ensuring actors (and thus their actions) and finance are traceable, (c) tightening regulations and compliance mechanisms to avoid the cost-shifting inherent in trade and (d) improving the transparency of trade agreements, fishing licensing and large-scale land acquisitions. Achieving these shifts involves actions across all levers. Although changes are ultimately delivered through trade policy (i.e. economy and finance and governance levers), these will only become available by progress and demand generated through the science and research and collective action levers. This is because existing trade institutions are designed to protect rather than challenge the dominant influence of financial wealth (Visseren-Hamakers et al., 2021;Hickel et al., 2022). Powerful vested interests in centres of wealth hold great political influence, while small-scale land or resource users with less political or economic visibility become scapegoats (Hickel et al., 2022).The short-term, pro-growth and siloed decision-making tendencies of global trade must ultimately be resolved through actions within the economy and finance lever. This will require addressing the dominant corporate culture that continuously aspires to influence rule-making and monopolise resources (Hickel, 2017). Curbing corporations' lobbying influence might be partly achieved by expanding impact evaluation processes of proposed mergers, specifically through assessing impacts on prices, market structures, human well-being and the environment more broadly (Cafaggi and Pistor, 2015;Clapp, 2021). Lobbying for trade policy shifts such as blocs against 'imported deforestation' (Bager et al., 2021), or moratoria for suppliers or regions linked to environmental harm can have considerable impacts. Identifying, communicating and lobbying for policy reforms, such as curbing fisheries subsidies through the World Trade Organisation (Cisneros-Montemayor et al., 2020), is crucial for Connected Conservation.Science and technology are fundamental, as they can gather evidence and develop the tools required to enable needed reforms. For instance TRASE (an open-access platform on supply chain flows) has enabled transparent monitoring of trade and finance linked to externalities (or cost-shifting) of deforestation (Gardner et al., 2019), while Global Fishing Watch is improving traceability via tracking global fishing activity in near real time. Evidence-based information can strengthen lawsuits focused on delivering liability for environmental and social externalities of extraction. For example, 'counter-forensics' (Digital Architecture group) generated evidence fundamental to the ultimate expulsion of a giant palm oil company from FSC certification in old growth Papuan forest (BBC, 2021).One key way to diminish all three negative flowsone world development, climate change and global trade (Brondizio et al., 2019;Pörtner et al., 2021) involves reducing the demand for commodity consumption in centres of wealth. This requires actions across all levers, many of which are not within the conventional remit of site-level conservation and challenge conservation to work towards transforming deeply entrenched ideologies of success and progress (Cinner and Kittinger, 2015;Balmford et al., 2021).Redefining common visions of prosperity is considered fundamental to reducing excessive consumer demand for commodities from extractive sectors and the 'breaking of capitalist habits' (Feola et al., 2021). Citizen action and mobilisation is vital. While government action is necessary, mainstreaming norms of living that reduce consumerism is unlikely to manifest without strong, bottom-up, demand from an informed population. Thus, through the interplay between collective action, and science and technology levers -Connected Conservation seeks actions that inform and mobilize publics to demand system change. Lack of concern or emotional disconnection has shown to be a main obstacle to more effective collective action, and it is particularly pervasive with long-distance environmental problems such as deforestation overseas (Bastos Lima et al., 2021). Conversely, the strength of humanitarian, emotive story-telling has been central in the climate change movement (Raymond et al., 2013) and may offer promise for conservation (Caldwell and Henry, 2020). Research shows that revealing the humanitarian dimension of environmental harm may help mobilize actors, and can engage even diverse stakeholders with powerful interests in the status quo (Carmenta et al., 2017). Research on the narrative shifts that would help recalibrate the understanding of conservation as a form of aid, to conservation as a collective responsibility underscored by principles of stewardship is crucial (Trisos et al., 2021). Conservation-orientated gaming, citizen science platforms and citizens assemblies have all been used to help reach a broader public with messaging about the importance and intricacy of our collective relationship with the natural world (Dorward et al., 2017;Fletcher, 2017), or enhancing empathy for 'distant' citizens through innovative methods (e.g. virtual reality) (Nelson et al., 2020).Broadening access to the knowledge and science that explains sustainability problems and the role of actors within them is also important (Blasiak et al., 2021). Connected Conservation must work more closely with the education and advertising sectors within centres of wealth to ensure that concepts such as climate change, justice, natural history, planetary boundaries, political ecology, sustainability and telecoupling are sufficiently embedded within formal educational curricula, because people may care more for what they know (Heimlich and Ardoin, 2008). Once inspired, citizens can be a powerful source of pressure on governments to demand effective and just policies supporting Connected Conservation (Raymond et al., 2013;Amel et al., 2017).Connected Conservation must identify and lobby for policies that convey broad ideological shifts towards the \"subordinat[ion of] economic objectives to ecological criteria\" (Raymond et al., 2013;Escobar, 2015;Hughes et al., 2017). These policies may enable, or require, citizens and companies to make sustainable decisions regardless of their own environmental values. Recent research and action shows how behavioral science and environmental law can be used across scales to foster positive changes (Balmford et al., 2021). For instance, environmental law can assist transformational change through enforcement, correctives and compensation for victims, which ultimately signal to society that over-consumption and associated damages are no longer acceptable (e.g. illegal wildlife trade (Phelps et al., 2021)).Connected Conservation requires bringing together a wide range of stakeholders and sectors to demystify and popularize contemporary 'alternative' living models that respect planetary boundaries (Rockström et al., 2009;Raworth, 2017). Examples of such models include social housing ventures that aspire to reduce overconsumption (Angel, 2021;Martínez, 2021), and the movement of cities geared around reclaiming and protecting the commons to satisfy social wellbeing without the need of expansion (Comú et al., 2019;Russell, 2019;Thompson, 2021). Additional examples, already being put into action, include community economies, transition towns, and ecovillagesand are geared towards enhanced resilience through, potentially replicable and scalable, decarbonized and care-focused communities (Hopkins et al., 2008;Litfin, 2012;Gibson-Graham et al., 2013;Kallis and March, 2015). Connected Conservation can support a research agenda focused on identifying the impacts of these alternative models, and how to raise their profile to promote large-scale change (Balmford et al., 2021). Lobbying for supportive policies could help ensure that increased demand for new aspirational futures is coupled with government investments to normalize and make available the alternative models needed, which in turn can shift cultural norms and consumer preferences (Scott, 2008), particularly, when accompanied by better advertising regulation.Proximity between research and activism has proven a fertile ground for transformation (Fletcher et al., 2020). For example, the fusion of post-growth and degrowth academic and activist movements have started to define alternative aspirational futures that replace and recast notions of wealth and understandings of progress, and also identify policy options that may support them (Kallis, 2018). These 'radical' partners (e.g. activists, climate action youth, eco-feminists, political ecologists) have, however, hitherto remained peripheral to conventional conservation but hold great promise for Connected Conservation (Massarella et al., 2021).An enhanced model of site-level conservation (i.e. collaborative conservation) must be supported by empowering alternative knowledge systems, visions of a good life and the plurality of values about nature (IPBES, 2022). It can do so by amplifying the presently marginalized flows that contribute to transformative sustainability values (Visseren-Hamakers et al., 2021). Establishing meaningful recognition and broad validation for the diverse lifeways, notions of a good life and knowledge systems requires profound change in conservation practice in centres of wealth (see Sections 3.1 and 3.2), as well as in site-level conservation action. Decolonial conservation approaches that engage with transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge and impact evaluations are opening new horizons (Rodríguez and Inturias, 2018). For instance, the shift enables Connected Conservation to be more aligned with local conceptions of well-being and the full suite of values that influence and motivate behaviours; it also helps reveal the true extent of injustices created by environmental harms, or indeed sometimes conservation intervention itself (Carmenta et al., n.d.;Cundill et al., 2017;Zafra-Calvo et al., 2020). New relational frameworks are enriching our understanding of the ways in which the environment mediates and contributes to multi-dimensional human well-being (Chan et al. 2016;Sterling et al., 2017).An example of progress in this direction is a site-level approach to assess and enhance governance of area-based conservation developed by an international consortium of NGOs and scientists. SAGE (Site-level Assessment of Governance and Equity) is a toolkit for multi-stakeholder assessment of conservation governance designed around three dimensions of equity: recognition, procedure and distribution (Schreckenberg et al., 2016). This and other related initiatives such as the IUCN Green List are important because they change the basis upon which we evaluate the performance of area-based conservation, from singular attention on biodiversity gains (and/or financial poverty alleviation) to measures more attuned with biocultural approaches, including recognition of local values and knowledge. By documenting and duly recognizing diverse people-nature relationships, IPBES is also helping to counter dominant worldviews and build momentum towards broader recognition of the contribution of biodiversity to human well-being and the diverse relationships between people and nature (Pascual et al., 2017a;Díaz et al., 2018).The capability to reclaim, rebuild and revive cultural ties is a resistance option that defends marginalized peoples and their cultures from homogenization (Rodríguez and Inturias, 2018;Yuliani et al., 2018;Leyva-Solano, 2019). Connected Conservation requires strong collaboration with place-based voices that defy dominant development in defence of diverse values, norms, knowledges and socio-ecological practices (Pilgrim and Pretty, 2010;Fletcher et al., 2020;Pascual et al., 2021). Working with humility across stakeholders and sectors can enable governance responsessuch as educational curricula that reproduce and recognize local traditional and Indigenous perspectives (Garcia and Shirley, 2013). For example, place-based curricula have been a formidable tool in the political agency and resistance of the marginalized, from the Zapatistas of Mexico and the peasant agro-food territories (TCAs) of Colombia, to the Eskola Rimba (Rimba School) of Indonesia (Leyva-Solano, 2019;Manurung, 2019;Feola et al., 2021). At their most powerful, place-based educational material will reach beyond local curriculums and be delivered to wider social groups (Guilherme and Hüttner, 2015).Crucially, Connected Conservation must move beyond simplified assumptions of values and incentives. For example, from a focus on shifting human behavior through individual motives and values (Balmford et al., 2021), towards focussing on larger-scale systemic shifts, or questioning structural socio-economic conditions driving exclusion, disempowerment and associated aspects of poverty. Further, the concept of biodiversity stewards remains branded as a 'romantic' vision that stands against the 'better evidence' and pragmatic realism of frameworks centred on utility-maximising 'man' (Bregman, 2020). These colonial tendencies of conventional conservation are now being called out (Armenteras, 2021;Gram-Hanssen et al., 2021;Trisos et al., 2021). New research could help identify what enables the resilience and persistence of local communities (rather than their collapse) (Smith et al., 2021) and, in so doing, identify how best to support communities over the long term. For example, in Indonesia's oil palm frontiers strong social connections, integral customary traditions and embedded peoplenature relationships are central to the rejection of oil palm development (Yuliani et al., 2020).Increasingly, local communities and networks are mobilising to share their knowledge and build alternative futures. Though still marginal and as yet unable to make significant macro-level transformations, such initiatives reflect a visible counter-trend to one-world development. These alternatives can be a re-assertion of ancient cultures, or be very new, but all have a core of ethical values that put justice and nature (including humans) at the centre. Bringing together these ideas and practices to create a critical mass is seen as crucial, and learnings from initiatives such as the Global Tapestry of Alternatives and the Vikalp Sangam (Alternatives Confluence) represent promising opportunities for Connected Conservation partnerships (Kothari, 2020).The collaborative branch of Connected Conservation sees empowered, autonomous and self-determined local communities being supported by established, recognized and defended rights. The positive flows of local biocultural governance, diverse values and diverse knowledge can be enhanced and safeguarded by governance changes that move away from the traditional approach of 'resolving' frugal lifestyles, and instead champion the authority, rights and capabilities of contemporary biodiversity stewards to exercise diverse visions of prosperity (Stavenhagen, 2006;Garnett et al., 2018), and living well with nature.Forms of governance that enable place-based stewardship of nature in the context of local culture and knowledge, provide effective, equitable and cost-efficient models for conservation and restoration of biodiverse landscapes (Schleicher et al., 2017;Reyes-García et al., 2019). This major contribution to conservationand its diversity of local and alternative models of conservationis now beginning to be recognized in international conservation. For example through the adoption of new terminology (e.g. Other Effective area based Conservation Measures (OECMs) or Indigenous and Community Conserved areas (ICCAs)) to recognize areas of land and sea that are effectively conserved locally even where the primary management objective focuses on culture, autonomy or wellbeing, rather than biodiversity conservation per se (Alves-Pinto et al., 2021;Gurney et al., 2021;Shaw, 2021). Biosphere Reserves (BRs) sponsored by UNESCO offer an example of a site-based biocultural model of conservation supported through formal global conservation governance. They promote a model for learning about diverse ways of living with nature that incorporates a biocultural basis for conservation. This principle was established with the first example in Cape Horn (Berghoefer et al., 2010) and their benefits over more segregationist models of conservation have since been documented in many locations, along with the possibilities for strengthening the BR approach through greater commitment to biocultural diversity (Karez et al., 2015). The BR model links with larger scale 'telecoupled' conservation as it is influenced by global efforts to counter hegemonic oneworld development, through global legal interventions such as the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and global scientific initiatives such as the knowledge and value pluralism.Broader innovations within state legal systems can enhance biodiversity conservation locally, providing a pathway for self-determined management strategies informed by plural values. Legal governance, and specifically environmental law, holds unrealized potential to uphold environmental protection and support place-based conservation and associated localized cultural practices (Phelps et al., 2021). For instance, in 2017, the government of New Zealand/Aotearoa granted personhood to the Whanganui River (Te Awa Tupua) as a result of nation-to-nation negotiations with the Māori of the Whanganui Iwi (Macpherson, 2019). Ecuador has incorporated Indigenous law into its constitution by giving rights to 'Pachamama' (Mother Earth) as well as \"buen vivir\" (\"living well\") as a holistic measure to protect marginalized members of society, and support Indigenous principles of responsibility, reciprocity and interconnectedness (Sajeva, 2017).Important instances of resistance and self-determination have been catalysed through the collective action lever in multiple biocultural centres which Connected Conservation can support. For example, peasant and Indigenous movements and networks such as the Zapatistas, La Via Campesina, TCAs and ICCAs all orientate around principles of localized aspirational futures, and are grounded on principles such as autonomy, food sovereignty, solidarity, sufficiency, participation and the collective (Kothari et al., 2019;Feola et al., 2021). Through diverse partnerships with stakeholders that are embedded in place, locally salient welfare needs and hardships can be identified. Sound health is a prerequisite for the freedom to choose and self-define futures, and some conservation initiatives are now working in collaboration with the health sector to provide these services that inadvertently strengthen community capability to remain and to flourish (Miller, 2020).Conservation science and practice is constantly evolving, from its original biological focus (Soulé, 1985), to its more recent consideration of people and societies (Mace, 2014) and a phase featuring investments in nature (Kareiva and Marvier, 2012). It is evident another step change is unfolding (Büscher and Fletcher, 2019). Connected Conservation builds on this momentum to take us beyond site-level emphasis, or simplistic narratives about poverty and local biodiversity threats. It instead highlights the role of wealth-related drivers in precipitating biodiversity and cultural loss. Bringing about the four desired states in which biological and cultural diversity can flourish will not be easy or straightforward-there are strongly embedded power structures that encourage incremental innovation (Feola et al., 2021), rather than more fundamental changes to challenge the status quo. We do not contend that the conservation sector has either the expertise or capacity to deliver the four desired states alone, but highlight the necessary transformation to contemporary conservation, and the imperative to pursue new actions and alliances. Conservation must challenge itself to meet this need, working in diverse partnerships and with different sectors and disciplines to bring about fundamental changes with justice at the centre. A key task will be to improve our understanding of the impact of Connected Conservation actions across scales (Editorial, 2021), and how best to apply these actions so that we can live well without destroying the biological and cultural diversity that defines the living world and our well-being as part of it.RC, JB, CH and BV conceived the idea for the study; FF and NEC curated the data and ran the analysis; RC, JB, AM, NEP, FF prepared and developed the Figures and Visualizations; RC, JB, CH led the writing of the original draft. RC, JB, MBL, EB, SC, NEC, FF, EK, AL, AM, UP, NP, JR, IR, AS, TS, BV, JGZ and CH developed sub-section parts and made critical contributions to the review & editing phases of subsequent drafts, and gave final approval for publication.There is no conflict of interest.","tokenCount":"5334"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1410459400.json b/data/part_2/1410459400.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..435a358ae6d9ecb622383a7cf5c56afb6e02cc0d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1410459400.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"154877cf8f4bb0507b6091285d209b76","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/4f7c9c11-4caf-477e-a018-64637de70f21/retrieve","id":"-1611774047"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"56725ecb-1616-4af5-aff3-c2e2f5a1ac56","pagecount":"79","content":"The year 2019 was the first year of the current five-year strategy (2019)(2020)(2021)(2022)(2023) of the International Water Management Institute (IWMI). IWMI started implementation of the new strategy which included restructuring of the Leadership Team. The new strategy strengthens the alignment between global water challenges and IWMI's strategic programs. This was the third year of Phase 2 of the CGIAR Research Program (CRP) on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE). WLE, as a program, continues to gain prominence. The new set of research activities that underpin Phase 2 are all well underway. IWMI completed the first phase of implementation of the new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software.This implementation included review and improvement of existing business processes. IWMI implemented the new Management structure which included restructuring the Research programs and hiring of new Country representatives. These changes ensure that the organization is ready to address the key water challenges that the world faces. Sri Lanka faced terrorist attacks in April 2019. This affected the operating environment for IWMI. Management with guidance from the Board made immediate improvements in security management and business processes to address the situation. IWMI is using the learning from this experience in the COVID-19 response.The global funding situation continues to remain variable. Global financial changes continue to challenge both IWMI and CGIAR. However, there was significant improvement in resource mobilization both at IWMI and at the CGIAR System level.The Board of Governors continues to take an active role in monitoring IWMI's risk management strategy, not only from the perspective of financial elements but also with respect to research strategies and issues.The Board has adopted the attached risk management policy that has been communicated to all staff together with detailed management guidelines. The policy includes a framework by which the Institute's management identifies, evaluates and prioritizes risks and opportunities across the organization; develops risk mitigation strategies that balance benefits with costs; monitors the implementation of these strategies; and reports, in conjunction with finance and administration staff, and internal audit staff, on results to the full Board annually.IWMI is working with CGIAR on the new One CGIAR initiative. The aim of this initiative is to ensure CGIAR has the organizational structure which can address global Food, Water and Land challenges. Increased funding from funders and improved governance are some of the results that are expected from this initiative. IWMI invests its funds in line with the investment policy approved by the Board of Governors, and IWMI's management regularly updates the Board on the implementation of the policy.On behalf of members of the Board, I wish to thank IWMI's investors and partners for their continued support and commitment to the Institute's work.The Board of Governors is responsible for the system of risk management and internal controls. Through the Audit Committee, the Board has reviewed the effectiveness of the Risk Management Processes. The identification of significant risks, which can affect achievement of the International Water Management Institute's (IWMI's) business objectives and ensure there is alignment with CGIAR principles, is an essential part of this Risk Management Process.The Board has reviewed the Risk Register and the proposed mitigation actions. The Board endorses the current risk ratings based on the analysis provided in the Risk Register. The global funding situation continues to remain variable. There was improvement in the amounts of funds received by IWMI in FY 2019. A number of new donors started funding IWMI and existing donors increased their contributions. This has brought in different sets of risks compared to the years before. These risks include operational, financial and reputational risks. The Risk Framework is implemented to address these risks. A process of regular follow-up to address risk mitigation measures has been initiated. The Board ensures that the full range of agreed risk mitigation actions are duly taken.Risks include the following:1. Misallocation of scientific efforts away from agreed priorities. 2. Loss of reputation for scientific excellence and integrity. 3. Increased competition from competitors, leading to a reduction of resources for IWMI to undertake key priorities. 4. Change in funding channels, leading to a reduction in the source of funds that IWMI can apply for. 5. Business disruption and information system failure. 6. Liquidity problems. 7. Transaction processing failures. 8. Loss of assets, including information assets. 9. Failure to recruit, retain, and effectively utilize qualified and experienced staff. 10. Failure in staff health and safety systems. 11. Failure by the System Management Office to execute legal and fiduciary responsibilities. 12. Withdrawal or reduction of funding by donors due to variable funding situation. 13. Subsidization of the cost of projects funded from restricted grants and/or partial non-delivery of promised outputs, due to inadequate costing of restricted projects. 14. Failure by the lead center to comply with the terms of the agreement and/or not delivering on the agreed outputs. 15. Non-prioritization of natural resource management in the CGIAR Research Programs due to lack of funding.The process draws upon risk assessments and analyses prepared by staff of the center's business unit, internal auditors, center-commissioned external reviewers and the external auditors. Internal Audit is provided by Audit Asia, which is a shared audit unit between IWMI, International Rice Research Institute(IRRI), Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), WorldFish and the World Vegetable Center, and hosted by IWMI.IWMI's Risk Mitigation Strategy includes implementation of an internal control system which is preventive in nature. The internal control system includes having the appropriate infrastructure, controls, systems and people in place. Regular business environment scans, implementation of clear policies and procedures, implementation of transaction approval frameworks, regular financial and management reporting, and the monitoring of metrics designed to highlight positive or negative performance of both individuals and business processes are the key aspects of the internal control system.Financial Statements -December 31, 2019The design and effectiveness of the risk management system and internal control system are subject to ongoing review by the center's internal audit service, which is independent of the business units, and which reports on the results of its audits directly to the Director General and the Board of Governors through its Finance and Audit Committee. IWMI is currently working with other CGIAR centers on the One CGIAR initiative. Once the new One CGIAR initiative is completed, all CGIAR centers including IWMI will have a further improved risk management and Internal control system.The Board also remains alert to the impacts of external events over which the center has no control. In March 2020, the World Health Organization announced a global pandemic with the spread of the COVID-19 virus. This has full fledged remote working for all IWMI offices. This has been possible because of the investments made by IWMI in ERP and other processes over the last few years. This situation is going to continue and may require constant review by the IWMI Board. The experience received and improvements made as a result of the Sri Lanka Terrorist attacks in FY 2019 is helping IWMI to address the COVID-19 crisis. The Board aims to monitor the external situation including the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and, if the need arises, provide mitigation measures.Chair, Board of Governors, IWMIFinancial Statements -December 31, 2019 Statement of the Management's Responsibilities for Financial Reporting IWMI management is required to prepare annual financial statements and is responsible for the accuracy and reliability of the financial information. IWMI management also claims responsibility for the substance and objectivity of the information contained therein.The accompanying annual financial statements of IWMI for the year ended December 31, 2019, have been prepared in accordance, and are fully compliant, with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and IFRS Compliant Reporting Guidelines released by the CGIAR System Organization. IWMI maintains a system of internal control designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded, and transactions are properly recorded and executed in accordance with the management's authorization.A system of reporting within IWMI presents the management with an accurate view of the operations, enabling it to discern risks to the assets or fluctuations in the economic environment of the Institute at an early stage and, at the same time, provide a reliable basis for the financial statements and management reports.The Board of Governors exercises its responsibility for these financial statements through its Finance and Audit Committee. The committee meets regularly with the management and representatives of the external auditors to review matters related to financial reporting, internal controls and auditing.The management is of the opinion that the annual financial statements, as presented in this document, give a true and fair view of IWMI's financial affairs and results for the year ended December 31, 2019.Director General The accounting policies on pages 13 to 30, notes on pages 31 to 54 and supplementary information on pages 55 to 74 form an integral part of the financial statements. The accounting policies on pages 13 to 30, notes on pages 31 to 54 and supplementary information on pages 55 to 74 form an integral part of the financial statements.Financial Statements -December 31, 2019Accounting PoliciesThe International Water Management Institute (IWMI) is an international organization that works on research for development and partners with governments, civil society and the private sector. IWMI works to solve water problems by conducting research in developing countries in order to create and scale up solutions that will help to achieve a water secure world. Financial Statements -December 31, 2019The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (\"IFRS\").The accompanying financial statements and supplementary schedules of IWMI were approved and authorized for issue by the Institute's Board of Governors on April 29, 2020. .The financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis except for the following items, which are measured on an alternative basis on each reporting date. Defined benefit -Actuarially valued and obligation recognized at present value of the defined benefit obligation.The financial statements are presented in United States Dollars (USD), which is IWMI's functional and presentation currency. All financial information presented in USD has been rounded to the nearest thousand, unless otherwise indicated.In preparing these financial statements, the management has made judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of IWMI's accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to estimates are recognized prospectively.Information about judgments made in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effects on the amounts recognized in the financial statements is included in the following notes.IWMI reviews all receivables at each reporting date to assess whether an impairment allowance should be recorded in the Statement of Activities. The management uses judgment in estimating such amounts in the light of the duration of the outstanding value and any other factors the management is aware of that may indicate uncertainty in recovery.Information about assumptions and estimation uncertainties that have significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment in the year ending December 31, 2019, is included in the following notes:Accounting Policies (Contd.)Financial Statements -December 31, 2019Defined Benefit Plans (Note 3.14) Measurement of defined benefit obligations: key actuarial assumptions; Defined benefit plans -severance, gratuity, pension and leave encashment are determined using actuarial valuations. The actuarial valuation involves making assumptions about discount rates, future salary increases and mortality rates.Key assumptions underlying recoverable amounts, including the recoverability of development costs.A number of IWMI's accounting policies and disclosures require the measurement of fair values for both financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. IWMI regularly reviews significant unobservable inputs and valuation adjustments. If third party information is used to measure fair values, IWMI assesses the evidence obtained from the third parties to support the conclusion that such valuations meet the requirements of IFRS, including the level in the fair value hierarchy in which such valuations should be classified.When measuring the fair value of an asset or a liability, IWMI uses observable market data as far as possible.Fair values are categorized into different levels in a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used in the valuation techniques as follows:Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices). Level 3: Inputs for the asset or liability that is not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).If the inputs used to measure the fair value of an asset or a liability fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy then the fair value measurement is categorized in its entirety in the same level of the fair value hierarchy as the lowest level input that is significant to the entire measurement. IWMI recognizes transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy at the end of the reporting period during which the change has occurred.IWMI has initially applied IFRS 16 with effect from January 1,2019. But it does not have a material effect on IWMI's financial statements.Except for the above IWMI has consistently applied the following accounting policies to all periods presented in these financial statements.Transactions denominated in currencies other than the presentation currency are translated to USD at the exchange rates prevailing at the beginning of the month in which the transaction took place. If the variation in the rates at the beginning and middle of the month is more than 2%, such variations are adjusted in the accounting system in the middle of the month.Accounting Policies (Contd.)Financial Statements -December 31, 2019Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than USD are translated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at the reporting date. Non-monetary items denominated in a foreign currency, which are carried at cost, are translated using the exchange rate prevailing on the date of the transaction.Foreign currency differences are generally recognized in the Statement of Activities.Revenue is the gross inflow of economic benefits during the period arising in the course of the ordinary activities of a CGIAR center, where those inflows result in increases in net assets. The major portion of a center's revenue is derived through the receipts of donor grants -either 'Unrestricted' or 'Restricted'.Unrestricted grant revenue arises from the unconditional transfer of cash or other assets to IWMI. Restricted grant revenue arises from a transfer of resources to IWMI in return for past or future compliance related to the operating activities of the Institute.Gross inflow of economic benefits includes amounts collected on behalf of the principal and do not result in an increase in the net assets, which are treated as 'Agency Transactions' and are not recognized as revenue.Grants are recognized as revenue when the outcome of a transaction involving the rendering of services can be measured reliably. Revenue associated with the transaction is recognized by making reference to the stage of completion of the transaction at the reporting date. Grants are recognized as revenue to the extent of the expenses incurred.Unrestricted grants are recognized as revenue upon unconditional transfer of cash or other assets by donors. Such revenue is recognized in full in the financial year for which the grant is pledged.As a Lead Center, grants received for the CRPs are recognized in the full amount of grants received from the System Organization (Windows 1 and 2), including the amounts passed on to other centers and spent by them. Disbursements to another CGIAR center by the Lead Center are recorded as a 'Prepaid Expense' until an expenditure report is received from the other center, and the expenditure amount is then liquidated from prepaid expense. This accounting treatment is in accordance with IFRS.Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.(a) Cash grants are recorded at the face value of the cash received or the USD equivalent.(b) Grant revenue, including non-monetary grants at fair value, is recognized when there is reasonable assurance that the:i. organization will comply with the conditions attached to them; andii. grants will be received.(c) Grants are recognized as revenue over the periods necessary to match them with the related costs, which they are intended to compensate, on a systematic basis.Accounting Policies (Contd.)Financial Statements -December 31, 2019Cost Sharing Percentage (CSP) CSP is charged as follows:a) Windows 1 and 2 projects -Net grants after deducting CSP is received and accounted for the same. b) Windows 3 projects -Net grant after deducting CSP is received. As required by IFRS compliant CGIAR reporting guidelines, grant is reported gross and CSP is accounted for as an expense. c) Bilateral projects -Gross amount is received as the grant and 2% on the grant is recorded for and paid as an expense.Other revenues and gains are recognized in the period in which they are earned.Expenses are recognized when a decrease in future economic benefits, related to a decrease in an asset or an increase in a liability, has arisen that can be measured reliably. Expenses are recognized on the basis of a direct association between the costs incurred and the earning of specific items of revenue. IWMI presents an analysis of expenses using a classification based on the function and nature of expenses within the Institute.Research Expenses: These are the costs incurred for the activities that result in goods and services being distributed to beneficiaries, project proponents and members that fulfill the purpose of a mission for which IWMI exists.CGIAR Collaborator Expenses: This is the total expenditure incurred by other CGIAR centers in collaborative research undertaken by them.Non-CGIAR Collaborator Expenses: These are the costs incurred by external partners in collaborative research as per the contract research agreements between the partners and the CGIAR center.General and Administration Expenses: These are the expenses incurred for activities of IWMI other than Research Expenses. These expenses are also referred to as 'Governance and central support functions', 'Institutional costs' or 'Administrative costs'. The 'Management and Administration' costs are collectively referred to as indirect costs and include expenses of IWMI's Board of Governors, office of the Director General, Finance and Human Resources departments, internal and external audit costs, Communication and Knowledge Management (CKM) Division, and the unrecovered part of services.Direct costs are charged, in particular, to the programs benefited. Indirect costs are allocated to programs based on the total direct cost. The costs of providing the programs, management and general activities have been summarized on a functional basis in the notes. Accordingly, certain costs have been allocated among programs and other services, management and general activities.IWMI's finance income and expense include the following: Financial assets are not reclassified subsequently to their recognition unless the Institute changes its business model for managing financial assets, in which case all affected financial assets are reclassified on the first day of the first reporting period following the change in the business model.A financial asset is measured at amortized cost if it meets both of the following conditions and is not designated as at FVTPL; -It is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets to collect contractual cash flows; and -Its contractual terms give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding. A debt investment is measured at FVOCI if it meets both of the following conditions and is not designated as at FVTPL; -It is held within a business model whose objective is achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial assets; and -Its contractual terms give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payment of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.On the initial recognition of an equity investment that is not held for trading, the Institute may irrevocably elect to present subsequent changes in the investment's fair value in OCI. This election is made on an investment-by-investment basis.Accounting Policies (Contd.)Financial Statements -December 31, 2019All financial assets not classified as measured at amortized cost or FVOCI as described above are measured at FVTPL. This includes all derivative financial assets. On initial recognition, the Institute may irrevocably designate a financial asset that otherwise meets the requirements to be measured at amortized cost or at FVOCI as at FVTPL if doing so eliminates or significantly reduces an accounting mismatch that would otherwise arise.The Institute makes an assessment of the objectives of the business model in which a financial asset is held as a portfolio level because this best reflects the way the business is managed and information is provided to management. The information considered includes;The stated policies and objectives for the portfolio and the operation of those policies in practice. These include whether management's strategy focuses on earning contractual interest income, maintaining a particular interest rate profile, matching the duration of the financial assets to the duration of any related liabilities or expected cash outflows or realizing cash flows through the sale of the assets;-How the performance of the portfolio is evaluated and reported to the Institute's management.-The risks that affect the performance of the business model (and the financial assets held within the business model) and how those risks are managed;-The frequency, volume and timing of sales of financial assets in prior periods, the reason for such sale and expectation about future sales activity.Transfers of financial assets to third parties in transactions that do not qualify for derecognition are not considered sales for this purpose, consistent with the Institute's continuing recognition of the assets.Financial assets that are held for trading or are managed and whose performance is evaluated on a fair value basis are measured at FVTPL. IWMI's financial assets classified and measured at amortized cost are limited to its accounts receivable, (accounts receivable -donors, accounts receivable -employees), cash and cash equivalents and investments.(i) Accounts Receivable -Donors All receivable balances are valued at their net realizable amount, i.e., gross amount of receivable balances minus, if applicable, allowances for impairment losses. Allowances for impairment losses are provided in an amount equal to the total receivables shown, or reasonably estimated to be doubtful of collection. The amount of the allowance is based on past experience, and a continuous review of receivable reports and other relevant factors. When an account receivable is deemed to be doubtful in collection, an impairment allowance is provided during the year account is deemed doubtful. Any receivable or portion of accounts receivable judged to be uncollectible is written off. Write-offs of receivables are made while making impairment allowance for doubtful accounts after all efforts to collect such amounts have been exhausted.Accounts receivable from donors consist of amounts due from restricted grants that have been negotiated between the donor and the CGIAR center. It also pertains to claims from donors for expenses paid on behalf of projects in excess of cash received.Account receivable from employees consist of advances made to officers and employees for travel, benefits, salary, loans, etc.Accounting Policies (Contd.)Financial Statements -December 31, 2019Cash and Cash Equivalent Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash in hand, balances with banks, and short term highly liquid investments that are readily convertible that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash with original maturity periods of 3 months or less, and which are subject to and insignificant risk of change in value.Investments acquired with the intention of disposing the same within 1 year or less from the acquisition date are classified as current investments. Investments classified as current, as distinguished from cash equivalents, are those that are acquired with original maturities of more than 3 months, but not exceeding one year.Investments are initially recorded at their cost. Interests or gains related to short -term investments are reported in the Statement of Activities under Finance Income.The short -term investments represents time deposits with banks that are collateral against national staff loan schemes and term deposits with original maturities of more than 3 months.These assets are subsequently measured at fair value. Net gains and losses, at FVTPL including any interest or dividend income, are recognized in profit or loss.Financial assets at These assets are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the amortized cost effective interest method. The amortized cost is reduced by impairment losses. Interest income and impairment are recognized in profit or loss. Any gain or loss on derecognition is recognized in profit or loss.Debt investments These assets are subsequently measured at fair value. Interest income at FVOCI calculated using the effective interest method and impairment are recognized in profit or loss. Other net gains and losses are recognized in OCI. On derecognition, gains and losses accumulated in OCI are reclassified to profit or loss.Equity investments These assets are subsequently measured at fair value. Dividends are at FVOCI recognized as income in profit or loss unless the dividend clearly represents a recovery of part of the cost of the investment. Other net gains and losses are recognized in OCI and are never reclassified to profit or loss.Financial liabilities are classified as measured at amortized cost of FVTPL. A financial liability is classified as at FVTPL if it is classified as held-for-trading, it is a derivative or it is designated as such on initial recognition. Financial liabilities at FVTPL are measured at fair value and net gains and losses, including any interest expense, are recognized in profit or loss. Other financial liabilities are subsequently measured at amortized cost using effective interest method. Interest expense and foreign exchange gains and losses are recognized in profit or loss. Any gain or loss on derecognition is also recognized in profit or loss.Accounting Policies (Contd.)Financial Statements -December 31, 2019IWMI's financial liabilities comprises of Accounts payable.Accounts payable are amounts due to employees and others for support, services and materials received prior to the year end, but not paid for as at the reporting date and amounts received from donors in respect of any unexpected funds received in advance for restricted grants.(a) Accounts payable -employees This includes unpaid salaries And bonuses and leave credits.(b) Accounts payable -others These include all other liabilities IWMI has incurred and has been billed for, which remains unpaid as at the reporting date.The Institute derecognizes a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial asset expire, or it transfers the rights to receive the contractual cash flows in a transaction in which substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset are transferred or in which the Institute neither transfers nor retains substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership and it does not retain control of the financial asset.The Institute derecognizes a financial liability when its contractual obligations are discharged or cancelled, or expire. The Institute also derecognizes a financial liability when its terms are modified and the cash flows of the modified liability are substantially different, in which case a new financial liability based on the modified terms is recognized at fair value.On derecognition of a financial liability, the difference between the carrying amount extinguished and the consideration paid (including any non-cash assets transferred or liabilities assumed) is recognized in profit or loss.Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the net amount presented in the statement of financial position when and only when, the Institute has a legal right to offset the amounts and intends either to settle on a net basis or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.Prepaid expenses comprise of deposits and advances to suppliers and other CGIAR centers. These are future expenses that have been paid in advance. The amount of prepaid expenses that have not yet expired are reported in IWMI's Statement of Financial Position as an asset. This consists of advance payments to suppliers, consultants and other third parties.Accounting Policies (Contd.)Financial Statements -December 31, 2019Inventories are held in the form of materials or supplies to be consumed in IWMI's operations or in the rendering of services. Cost of inventories is not directly expended at the time of purchase, and these are not held for sale in the ordinary course of business.Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business minus the estimated costs necessary to make the sale. Inventories are valued at whichever is lower of acquisition cost or net realizable value, and charged when used. The acquisition cost includes the purchase price plus cost of freight, insurance and handling charges. Cost is determined by the weighted average method. Provision is made, where necessary, for obsolete, slow moving and defective items.Inventories held at the end of the reporting period are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value.Property, plant and equipment are defined as tangible assets, which are: a) held by IWMI for use in the process of conducting the research and other activities in the institute or for administrative purposes; and b) expected to be used for more than one accounting period.An item of property, plant and equipment is recognized as an asset when: (a) it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the asset will flow to IWMI; and (b) the cost of the asset can be measured reliably.Effective January 1, 2017, the Institute increased its capitalization amount from USD 500 to USD 5,000. Accordingly, all individual tangible assets having costs in excess of USD 5,000 or its equivalent, with an estimated useful life beyond 1 year, are treated as fixed assets and designated as property, plant and equipment.Gains or losses arising from the discontinuation or disposal of property, plant and equipment are determined as the difference between the estimated net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset, and are recognized as revenue or expense in the Statement of Activities.Property, plant and equipment acquired from restricted funds are expensed in accordance with the grant agreement.Property, plant and equipment are initially measured at cost. Subsequent to initial recognition as an asset, property, plant and equipment are carried at cost minus any accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses.The cost of an item of property, plant and equipment comprises its purchase price and all other incidental costs in bringing the asset to its working condition for its intended use.Accounting Policies (Contd.)Financial Statements -December 31, 2019Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is calculated on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:Buildings and improvements on lease hold land -Over the lease period (25 years) Building renovation/partitioning/wiring -5 years Heavy-duty equipment -7 years Office and household furniture, fixtures, research and office equipment -5 years Vehicles -5 years Computer hardware -3 years Depreciation of acquired assets is determined in the year the asset is placed into operation, and continues until the asset is fully depreciated or its use is discontinued. Property, plant and equipment acquired through the use of grants restricted for a certain project are recorded as assets. Such assets are depreciated at a rate of 100%, and the depreciation expense is charged directly to the appropriate restricted project.Capital work-in progress represents the accumulated cost of materials and other costs directly related to the construction of an asset. Capital work-in-progress is transferred to the respective asset accounts at the time it is substantially completed and ready for its intended use.At inception of a contract, the Institute assesses whether a contract is, or contains, a lease. A contract is, or contains, a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. To assess whether a contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset, the Institute uses the definition of a lease in IFRS 16.This policy is applied to contracts entered into, on or after January 1, 2019.At commencement or on modification of a contract that contains a lease component, the Institute allocates the consideration in the contract to each lease component on the basis of its relative standalone prices. However, for the leases of property, the Institute has elected not to separate non-lease components and account for the lease and non-lease components as a single lease component.The Institute recognises a right-of-use asset and a lease liability at the lease commencement date. The rightof-use asset is initially measured at cost, which comprises the initial amount of the lease liability adjusted for any lease payments made at or before the commencement date, plus any initial direct costs incurred and an estimate of costs to dismantle and remove the underlying asset or to restore the underlying asset or the site on which it is located,less any lease incentives received.Institute applies the cost model for the subsequent measurement of the right-of-use asset and accordingly, the right-of-use asset is depreciated using the straight-line method from the commencement date to the end of the lease term, unless the lease transfers ownership of the underlying asset to the Institute by the end of the lease term or the cost of the right-of-use asset reflects that the Institute will exercise a purchase option. In that case the right-of-use asset will be depreciated over the useful life of the underlying asset, which is determined on the same basis as those of property and equipment. In addition, the right-of-use asset is periodically reduced by impairment losses, if any, and adjusted for certain remeasurements of the lease liability.Accounting Policies (Contd.)Financial Statements -December 31, 2019The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments that are not paid at the commencement date, discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot be readily determined, the Institute's incremental borrowing rate. Generally, the Institute uses its incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate.The Institute determines its incremental borrowing rate by obtaining interest rates from various external financing sources and makes certain adjustments to reflect the terms of the lease and type of the asset leased.Lease payments included in the measurement of the lease liability comprise the following:-fixed payments, including in-substance fixed payments; -variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate, initially measured using the index or rate as at the commencement date; -amounts expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee; and -the exercise price under a purchase option that the Institute is reasonably certain to exercise, lease payments in an optional -renewal period if the Institute is reasonably certain to exercise an extension option, and penalties for early termination of a lease unless the Institute is reasonably certain not to terminate early.The lease liability is measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. It is remeasured when there is a change in future lease payments arising from a change in an index or rate, if there is a change in the Institute's estimate of the amount expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee, if the Institute changes its assessment of whether it will exercise a purchase, extension or termination option or if there is a revised in-substance fixed lease payment.When the lease liability is remeasured in this way, a corresponding adjustment is made to the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset, or is recorded in profit or loss if the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset has been reduced to zero and short-term leases, including IT equipment. The Institute recognises the lease payments associated with these leases as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.The Institute has elected not to recognise right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for leases of low-value assets and short-term leases, including IT equipment. The Institute recognises the lease payments associated with these leases as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.IWMI has received following lands as a grant at no cost to the institute and accordingly, IWMI has elected not to recognize right-of-use asset and lease liability in respect of these. However, the buildings and improvements on these lands are capitalized and depreciated over the lease term in accordance with the agreements.Sri Lanka -The initial lease agreement between IWMI and the Government of Sri Lanka is for 25 years commencing in 1991. IWMI has received an extension of the lease, for a further period of 25 years, till 2041.Ghana -As per the lease agreement entered on July 1, 2013, by the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) and the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) in Accra, Ghana, IWMI was allowed to construct a new two-storey building in the CSIR head office premises. Accordingly, IWMI constructed the building using its own funds and moved into the new office in May 2015. The cost is amortized over the lease period.Accounting Policies (Contd.)Financial Statements -December 31, 2019The two-story building is jointly owned by CSIR, Ghana, and IWMI. However, the sole ownership of the building shall revert to CSIR when IWMI ceases its operations in West Africa. The leasehold agreement is for 25 years and shall be extended or revised on the mutual consent of both parties.Pakistan -The initial memorandum of agreement between IWMI and the Government of Pakistan was signed on September 28, 1986. Recently, at the request of the Government of Pakistan, IWMI submitted the necessary papers to renew the registration of the Institute in the country. IWMI's Pakistan office is situated in a building owned by the government, and the Institute incurred some refurbishment costs to bring the given building to a useable condition. Accordingly, these expenses are amortized over a period of 10 years starting from April 2018.Accordingly, as at January 1, 2019, the institute elected not to recognize right-of use asset and lease liability for short term and leases of low value assets and therefore the impact was not material on the institute's financial statements.As a lessee In the comparative period, as a lessee the Institute classified leases that transferred substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership as finance leases. When this was the case, the leased assets were measured initially at an amount equal to the lower of their fair value and the present value of the minimum lease payments. Minimum lease payments were the payments over the lease term that the lessee was required to make, excluding any contingent rent. Subsequent to initial recognition, the assets were accounted for in accordance with the accounting policy applicable to that asset.Assets held under other leases were classified as operating leases and were not recognised in the Institute's statement of financial position. Payments made under operating leases were recognized in Statement of Activities on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Lease incentives received were recognised as an integral part of the total lease expense, over the term of the lease.The intangible assets of IWMI are mainly computer software.Intangible assets are initially measured at cost. Subsequent to initial recognition as an asset, intangible assets are carried at cost minus any amortization and any accumulated impairment losses.The cost of an item of intangible assets comprises its purchase price and all other incidental costs in bringing the asset to its working condition for its intended use, such as installation.Amortization is calculated to write-off the cost of intangible assets less their estimated residual values using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, and is generally recognized in Statement of Activities.The estimated useful life of computer software is from 3 to 5 years. Amortization methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each reporting date and adjusted if appropriate.Accounting Policies (Contd.)The carrying amounts of IWMI's non-financial assets are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, then the asset's recoverable amount is estimated. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of an asset or cash generating unit (CGU) exceeds its recoverable amount.The recoverable amount of an asset or CGU is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset or CGU. For impairment testing, assets are grouped together into the smallest group of assets that generate cash inflows from continuing use that are largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets or CGUs.Impairment losses are recognized in the Statement of Activities. Impairment losses recognized in respect of CGUs are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to CGU (if any) and then to reduce the carrying amounts of other assets in the CGU (group of CGUs) on pro rata basis. For other assets, an impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the assets carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortization, if no impairment loss had been recognized.An employee may provide services to an entity on a full-time, part-time, permanent, contract or casual basis. Employees include directors and other management personnel. Employee benefits are all forms of consideration given by IWMI in exchange for services rendered by employees. Employee benefits include the following:(I) Short-term Employee Benefits Short-term employee benefits are expensed as the related service is provided. A liability is recognized for the amount expected to be paid if IWMI has a present legal or constructive obligation to pay this amount as a result of past service provided by the employee and the obligation can be estimated reliably. These include salaries, paid leave, bonuses and non-monetary benefits for current employees. These benefits are expected to be settled in full within a year in which the employees render the related services.(II) Defined Benefit Plans IWMI's net obligation in respect of defined benefit plans is calculated separately for each plan by estimating the amount of future benefit that employees have earned in the current and prior periods, discounting that amount and deducting the fair value of any plan assets.The calculation of defined benefit obligations is performed annually by a qualified actuary using the projected unit credit method. When the calculation results in a potential asset for IWMI, the recognized asset is limited to the present value of economic benefits available in the form of any future refunds from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan. To calculate the present value of economic benefits, consideration is given to any applicable minimum funding requirements.Remeasurements of the net defined benefit liability, which comprise actuarial gains and losses, the return on plan assets (excluding interest) and the effect of the asset ceiling (if any, excluding interest) are recognized immediately in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI). IWMI determines the net interest expense (income) on the net defined benefit liability (asset) for the period by applying the discount rate used to measure the defined benefit obligation at the beginning of the annual period to the then-net defined benefit liability (asset), taking into account any changes in the net defined benefit liability (asset) during the period as a result of contributions and benefit payments. Net interest expense and other expenses related to defined benefit plans are recognized in Statement of Activities.Accounting Policies (Contd.)Financial Statements -December 31, 2019When the benefits of a plan are changed or when a plan is curtailed, the resulting change in benefit that relates to past service or the gain or loss on curtailment is recognized immediately in Statement of Activities. IWMI recognizes gains and losses on the settlement of a defined benefit plan when the settlement occurs.The post-employment benefits include pension plan, other retirement benefits, post-employment life insurance and medical care. IWMI has a 'Defined Benefit' pension plan for its national staff based at its headquarters. This plan was closed in 2004 to new employees.IWMI's net obligation in respect of severance, gratuity and leave encashment, which are defined benefit plans, are determined based on an actuarial valuation carried out by an independent qualified actuary and are accrued at the reporting date. The liabilities are not externally funded.(a) Severance and GratuityIn accordance with the terms and conditions of recruitment, internationally recruited staff members are entitled to terminal benefits referred to as 'Severance' on the completion of three full years of continuous service. The present value of a defined benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated cash flows based on the actuarial valuation carried out by an independent qualified actuary.• Gratuity Payment is made for gratuity benefits under IWMI's personnel policies to nationally recruited staff. Nationally recruited staff qualify for a gratuity payment on completion of 5 years of continuous service with the Institute.The present value of a defined benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated cash flows based on the actuarial valuation carried out by an independent qualified actuary.Payment is made for unutilized leave to internationally and nationally recruited staff members in accordance with the Personnel Policies Manuals on the following basis:• International staff in Sri Lanka and regional offices: From 2018 onwards a maximum of 10 days and payment is calculated based on current base salary. • National staff in Sri Lanka: From 2018 onwards a maximum of 10 days and payment is calculated based on current base salary. • National staff in other regional offices: Vary from 7 to 30 days and payment is calculated based on current base salary.The present value of a defined benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated cash flows based on the actuarial valuation carried out by an independent qualified actuary.In accordance with the terms and conditions of recruitment, internationally recruited staff members and their dependents are entitled to repatriation benefits on completion of the contract period. Provision is made for repatriation payable to all international staff members based on the estimated cost of airfare, relocation and freight charges.This amount comprises accruals made for suppliers, for which invoices were not yet received as at the reporting date.Accounting Policies (Contd.)Financial Statements -December 31, 2019A provision is a liability of uncertain timing or amount. A provision is recognized when:(a) a center has a present obligation as a result of a past event;(b) it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation; and (c) a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.The amount recognized as a provision should be the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the reporting date. Provisions should be reviewed at each reporting date and adjusted to reflect the current best estimate. A provision should only be used for expenditure for which the provision was originally recognized.Net Assets are the residual interest in IWMI's assets remaining after liabilities are deducted. The overall change in net assets represents the total gains and losses generated by the Institute's activities during the year. Net assets are classified as either undesignated or designated.(a) Undesignated -the part of net assets that is not designated by IWMI's management for specific purposes.(b) Designated -the part of net assets that has been designated by IWMI's management for specific purposes.Property, Plant and Equipment: This is the net book value of property, plant and equipment as at the Statement of Financial Position date.The Statement of Cash Flows has been prepared using the 'indirect method'. This is the method whereby a surplus or deficit is adjusted for the effects of transactions of a non-cash nature, any deferrals or accruals of past or future operating cash receipts or payments, and items of income or expenses associated with investing or financing cash flows. The Statement of Cash Flows for a period shall report net cash provided or used by operating, investing and financing activities, and the net effect of those flows on cash and cash equivalents during the period, in a manner that reconciles the beginning and ending cash and cash equivalents.Events after the reporting date are those, both favorable and unfavorable, that occur between the reporting date and the date when the financial statements are authorized for issue. The materiality of the events occurring after the reporting period is considered and appropriate adjustments to or disclosures are made in the Financial Statements, where necessary. Two types of events can be identified:(a) Those that provide evidence of conditions that existed at the reporting date (adjusting events after the reporting date); and (b) Those that are indicative of conditions that arose after the reporting date (non-adjusting events after the reporting date).Adjusting events after the reporting date: IWMI adjusts the amounts recognized in its financial statements to reflect adjusting events after the reporting date.The financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis. However, IWMI doesn't prepare its financial statements on a going concern basis, if the management determines that it intends to cease operations or it has no realistic alternative but to do so after the reporting date.Accounting Policies (Contd.)Financial Statements -December 31, 2019The institute has applied IFRS 16 initially with effect from January 1, 2019. However, it does not have a material effect on the institute's financial statements On transition to IFRS 16, the Institute elected to apply the practical expedient to grandfather the assessment of which transactions are leases. The Institute applied IFRS 16 only to contracts that were previously identified as leases. Contracts that were not identified as leases under IAS 17 and IFRIC 4 were not reassessed for whether there is a lease under IFRS 16. Therefore, the definition of lease under IFRS 16 was applied only to the contracts entered into or changed on or after January 1,2019.As a lessee, the Institute leases some office premises. The Institute previously classified these leases as operating leases under IAS 17 based on its assessment of whether the lease transferred substantially all of the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of the underlying asset to the Institute. Under IFRS 16, the Institute recognises right-of use assets and lease liabilities for leases of office premises -i.e. these leases are on-balance sheet as a Right of use assets and Lease Liabilities. At commencement or on modification of a contract that contains a lease component, the Institute allocates the consideration in the contract to each lease component on the basis of its relative stand-alone prices.On transition, for these leases, lease liabilities were measured at the present value of the remaining lease payments, discounted at the Institute's incremental borrowing rate as at January 1, 2019. Accordingly, as at January 1, 2019 the institute elected not to recognize right-of use asset and lease liability for short term and leases of low value assets and therefore the impact was not material on the institute's financial statements. The Institute used a number of practical expedients when applying IFRS 16 to leases previously classified as operating leases under LKAS 17. In particular, the Institute, relied on its assessment of whether leases are -onerous under LKAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets immediately before the date of initial application as an alternative to performing an impairment review. -did not recognise right-of-use assets and liabilities for leases for which the lease term ends within 12 months of the date of initial application -did not recognise right-of-use assets and liabilities for leases of low-value assets. excluded initial direct costs from measuring the right-of-use asset at the date of initial application. -used hindsight when determining the lease term.Accordingly, as at January 1, 2019 the institute elected not to recognize right-of use asset and lease liability for short term and leases of low value assets and therefore the impact was not material on the institute's financial statements.Accounting Policies (Contd.)Financial Statements -December 31, 2019The following IFRSs have been issued that have an effective date in the future and have not been applied in preparing these Financial Statements and these amended standards are not expected to have a significant impact on the Institute's financial statements.In October 2018, the IASB issued amendments to LKAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements and LKAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors to align the definition of 'material' across the standards and to clarify certain aspects of the definition. As per the redefined definition, information is material if omitting, misstating or obscuring it could reasonably be expected to influence decisions that the primary users of general-purpose financial statements make on the basis of those financial statements, which provide financial information about a specific reporting entity.The amendments are effective from January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted. However, amendments to the definition of material is not expected to have a significant impact on the Institutes' financial statements.The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting is the foundation on which the new accounting standards are developed. The revised framework contains changes that will set a new direction for accounting standards in the future.The key changes in the framework are:-New 'bundles of rights' approach to assets -New 'practical ability' approach for recognizing liabilities -New control-based approach to derecognitionThe accounting policies which refer conceptual framework should be reviewed and the new guidance should be applied retrospectively from January 1, 2020.Accounting Policies (Contd.) 11.2. IWMI Assets in Hosting Institutions Some regional offices of IWMI are hosted by other organizations. These organizations provide operational support to IWMI based on signed agreements. As IWMI does not have a legal status in those countries, IWMI assets purchased in such regional offices are also in the name of these organizations. However, such assets are reflected in IWMI books of accounts.Details of the cost of IWMI assets under the name of hosting organizations as at December 31, 2019, are given below: IWMI has a \"Defined Benefit\" pension plan for its National Staff at Headquarters. This plan was closed in 2004 to new employees. The plan assets and liabilities are valued annually by a qualified Actuary.As per the revised Pension Fund Charter in August 2017, contributions to the fund can be discontinued with the unanimous consent of contributing participants of the fund with the concurrence of the Pension Board subjected to the approval of IWMI's Board of Governors. Accordingly, based on the Pension Board approval, IWMI's Board of Governors approved to cease the contribution to the Pension Fund with effect from December 31, 2017. Further, as per the amendment made to the Charter of IWMI's Pension Fund in February 2019, in the event of a dissolution of the fund, IWMI will be entitled to take any balance funds in the pension fund. Accordingly, any annual deficit or surplus of the pension fund shall be taken in to the IWMI's financial statements based on annual actuarial valuation.As at December 31, 2019, an actuarial valuation was carried out for Defined Benefit Obligations by Mr. M. Poopalanathan, AIA, Messrs. Actuarial and Management Consultants (Private) Limited; a firm of professional actuaries.As per actuarial valuation report, the present value of funded obligation as at the reporting date amounted to USD 1,928,294 and the fair value of the plan assets amounted to USD 2,564,833. Accordingly, a surplus of USD 636,539 has been recorded in the financial statements in relation to the pension fund.The following was one of the key assumptions made in computing the actuarial valuation of the above retirement benefits as at the reporting date;Actuarial assumption 2019 2018 Discount rate 11.50% 12.00%The calculation of the recognized asset for the defined benefit obligation was sensitive to the assumptions set out above. The following table summarizes how the recognized asset for the defined benefit obligation at the end of the reporting period would have increased/ (decreased) as a result of a change in the above assumption by one percent, while other assumptions remain constant.As Employee Benefit requires the use of actuarial techniques to make a reliable estimate of the amount of retirement benefit using the Projected Unit Credit Method, the method recommended by the IAS 19 on 'Employee Benefits', in order to determine the present value of the retirement benefit obligation as at the reporting date.The liability is not externally funded.Notes to the financial statements continued on page 40Notes to the Financial Statements (In US Dollars '000)The following key assumptions were made in computing the actuarial valuation of the above retirement benefits as at the reporting date. Employee Benefit requires the use of actuarial techniques to make a reliable estimate of the amount of retirement benefit using the Projected Unit Credit Method, the method recommended by IAS 19 on 'Employee Benefits', in order to determine the present value of the retirement benefit obligation as at the reporting date.The liability is not externally funded.Notes to the financial statements continued on page 43 The calculation of the defined benefit obligation is sensitive to the assumptions set out above.The following table summarizes how the defined benefit obligations at the end of the reporting period would have increased / (decreased) as a result of a change in the respective assumptions by one percent, while all other assumptions remain constant. Recovery of overhead costs represents the amount recovered from restricted projects based on the rates agreed on and as stated in the grant agreements.In 2019, IWMI changed the classification of overheads. Previously some allocated direct costs which were charged as overheads have been removed from overheads and will be charged directly on projects. The system ensures that there is no mix of direct and indirect costs. The overall cost recovery remains the same.The indirect cost ratios presented above have been computed based on the CGIAR Cost Allocation Guidelines, Financial Guidelines Series, No. 5.Financial Statements -December 31, 2019Net assets include both the designated and undesignated reserves.Undesignated -undesignated reserves represent the accumulated surplus of revenue over expenses.Designated -Property, Plant and Equipment. This is the net book value of property, plant and equipment as at the Statement of Financial Position date.On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the Coronavirus COVID-19 outbreak to be a pandemic in recognition of its rapid spread across the globe with over 150 countries now affected. Board of Governors is unable to estimate the potential impact of the outbreak on the Institute's financial position, as of date. However, the impact on Institute's financial statements is expected to be minimal.Apart from the above, there are no other events occurred subsequent to the reporting date which would require adjustment to, or disclosure in, the financial statements.There are no commitments and contingent liabilities at the reporting date.Notes to the financial statements continued on page 50Notes to the Financial Statements (In US Dollars '000)The organization has established a pension fund to discharge defined benefit pension liability of its national staff and this plan was closed to employees in 2004.Surplus receivable at December 31 (Note 13) 637 637Contributions paid by the organization --As disclosed in Note 13, contribution to the pension fund by the center and employees was ceased with effect from December 31, 2017, which was approved by the Board of Governors. However, if there is a deficit in the future, IWMI is bound to make the additional liability to the pension fund.Notes to the Financial Statements (In US Dollars '000)The following table shows the carrying amounts of financial assets and liabilities. The carrying values of financial instruments are a reasonable approximation of fair values, due to short-term maturity, hence the fair value hierarchy does not apply.Notes to the financial statements continued on page 51Financial Statements -December 31, 2019Notes to the Financial Statements (In US Dollars '000)Overview i) Risk Management Framework IWMI's Board of Governors has overall responsibility for ensuring that an appropriate risk management framework is in place. The management is responsible for the Institute-wide implementation of the risk management system to ensure that risks are identified appropriately, assessed and acted upon in accordance with IWMI's policies. The risk management system and policies are reviewed regularly to reflect the changes in the market conditions and the Institute's activities.IWMI ensures minimum risk either by exercising a high degree of control or not being involved in certain high-risk activities. The Board of Governors takes an active role in monitoring the Institute's risk management strategy, and financial aspects, as well as research strategies and issues. The Board of Governors has adopted a risk management policy that has been communicated to all staff together with a detailed management guideline. The policy includes a framework by which the Institute's management identifies, evaluates and prioritizes risks and opportunities across the organization; develops risk mitigation strategies that balance benefits with costs; monitors the implementation of these strategies; and reports, in conjunction with finance, administration and internal audit staff, the results to the Board, on an annual basis.The annual statement from the Board Chair addresses the Institute's risk management strategy, and identifies key areas of risk and processes in place to mitigate such risks.The Institute has exposure to the following risks from its use of financial instruments:1. Credit risk 2. Market risk 3. Liquidity riskCredit risk is the risk that occurs when a counterparty will not meet its obligations under a financial instrument or donor contract, leading to financial losses and arises principally from the Institute's cash and cash equivalents, investments and accounts receivable.Notes to the financial statements continued on page 52Financial Statements -December 31, 2019The carrying amount of financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The Institute is not exposed to any material concentrations of credit risk other than its exposure to various donors. Donor receivables are reviewed on a monthly basis and regular follow-up actions are carried out to recover the balances due. Receivable balances are monitored on an ongoing basis and provisions are made where necessary for doubtful accounts. IWMI's exposure to non-recoverability is insignificant. Cash and cash equivalents are held with reputable local and international financial institutions with good credit ratings. Investments are made as per the Investment Policy of the Institute. Accordingly, short-term investments, cash and cash equivalents are invested in a portfolio to safeguard the funds and with an investment objective of maximizing the returns. IWMI's investment policy defines the maximum exposure to a single financial institution, in order to ensure diversification of investments.The policy also states the types of instruments in which the funds can be invested and the types in which investment is not permitted. However, the requirement for impairment is analyzed at each reporting date on an individual basis for grant agreements. Market risk is the risk that occurs due to changes in market prices, such as interest rates and foreign exchange rates, which will affect the Institute's income or the value of its financial instruments. The objective of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters.Currency risk is the risk that occurs when the value of a financial instrument fluctuates due to changes in foreign exchange rates. IWMI's exposure to the risk of changes in foreign exchange rates primarily affects the Institute's operating activities (when revenue or an expense is denominated in a different currency from the Institute's functional currency) and bank accounts held in different currencies. In order to mitigate the foreign exchange risks, the Institute matches the currency of payment with the currency of donor funds received, wherever possible.The following table demonstrates the effect of a reasonably possible change in the US dollar exchange rate, with all other variables held constant, on the net surplus.Effect on net surplus/deficit (US$ '000)10% 69The movement on the net surplus/deficit effect is a result of the cash and cash equivalents denominated in currencies other than the functional currency (US Dollar). If the US Dollar had strengthened/ weakened by 10% against the major operating currencies, with all other variables held constant, there would have been an increase/decrease in the surplus/deficit for the year.Bank deposits and short-term investments of IWMI are placed in term deposits and fixed deposits at fixed interest rates. Therefore, the risk of volatility of market interest rates will be minimal.Notes to the financial statements continued on page 54Notes to the Financial Statements (In US Dollars '000)Liquidity risk is the risk that occurs when the Institute may encounter difficulties in meeting the obligation associated with its financial liabilities that are to be settled by delivering cash or other financial assets.One of the investment objectives of the Institute is to manage liquidity, which is to ensure that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due under both normal and stressed conditions. ","tokenCount":"10617"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1429416382.json b/data/part_2/1429416382.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..69f3678051f1deca19b8467914e80bb76bc79c53 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1429416382.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4f4aadfdf61b11696b49c37ba13f4121","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/26e8861e-3656-4ba2-a169-5681b3b96baa/retrieve","id":"1129211488"},"keywords":["livestock","feed","constraints"],"sieverID":"969016d2-619c-4ef6-a3f7-820e494c93a4","pagecount":"5","content":"Livestock production is central to the livelihoods of a billion poor people. Transforming livestock production would have transformative effects on local economies in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Development efforts in the livestock sector have tended to be top-down without enough feedback loops to understand farmer realities and aspirations. This, despite the Farmer First movement that began in the 1990s. The Feed Assessment Tool (FEAST) was developed as a reaction to top down livestock feed development approaches. FEAST facilitates a structured conversation with farming communities about their livestock production system and how it connects with the overall farming system. FEAST involves both individual farmer interviews and focus group discussions (FGD's). The final element of each FGD is a conversation with farmers on problems and opportunities for their livestock enterprise. Farmers are asked to name the issues which most limit their livestock enterprise and to rank them using a pair-wise ranking approach. The purpose of this exercise is to make sure that any following development activities consider the issues that really matter to farmers whether they be feed issues or other issues. FEAST has been applied in over a dozen countries and the many published reports provide a global overview of the main issues facing poor livestock keepers who are seeking to enhance their livestock enterprise. In this paper I will provide a global overview of livestock constraints based on over 150 focus group discussions involving over one thousand farmers from various countries in SSA and South Asia.Livestock production is central to the livelihoods of over 1 billion poor livestock keepers in low income countries. The mixed crop livestock production systems account for the largest share of these poor livestock keepers. Households typically keep small numbers of animals to provide food for domestic consumption as well as manure and traction for arable production. There is considerable variation in the extent to which livestock are kept for commercial milk and meat consumption, but the trend is upwards as urban populations grow and incomes increase (Duncan et al., 2013) Satisfying the resulting growth in demand for milk and meat is an opportunity for smallholder farmers but the transition from subsistence to semi-commercial production is challenging. Yields of milk and meat are generally far below the animals biological potential and development efforts to enhance productivity have often been disappointing. Productivity is influenced by a wide range of potential constraints including the classic trio of feeding, genetics and health but also constraints related to knowledge on basic husbandry, access to markets, lack of local infrastructure, access to finance and a range of other factors. Donors and governments look for promising intervention pathways and want to know where to invest their efforts and resources. This has spurred several initiatives to quantify the benefits of dealing with different sets of constraints to help focus investment. For example, ILRI engaged in a priority setting exercise for livestock research by identifying a list of research themes and then scoring each using a composite index based on e.g. benefit-cost ratios, pro-poor credentials and environmental effects (Randolph et al., 2001). The World Bank commissioned some work to identify investment options for ruminant livestock feeding in developing countries (Thorpe et al., 2012). Similarly, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funded the Livestock Knowledge Development Project (Staal et al., 2009) and more recently the Livegaps project (Mayberry et al., 2017), both aimed at using expert knowledge and modelling approaches to tease out the most efficient routes to improve livestock productivity in low income countries. These efforts are welcome but tend to be data driven without much consideration of the practical realities of smallholder farming practice. Farmers are p. 2 excellent integrators of knowledge and because their livelihoods depend on sound decision making, they are often best placed to offer insights into the most promising ways of improving the productivity of their livestock. However, there is a gap between conversations at donor/government level and the realities facing farmers and it is challenging to incorporate farmer perspectives into high-level decision making.The Feed Assessment Tool (FEAST) was developed partly as a reaction to lack of farmer involvement in design of livestock feed intervention strategies. The tool is designed to guide a structured conversation between researchers/development agents and farmers to improve overall understanding of the local livestock production system and the issues surrounding improved feeding. Although FEAST is designed as a community-led diagnosis of feed constraints leading to action on the ground, a by-product has been the collection of farmer perspectives on livestock feed constraints across many low and middle-income countries. In this paper I present the results of 10 years application of the FEAST tool across 14 countries to gain insights into the farmer perspective on livestock sector constraints.The Feed Assessment Tool (FEAST) was originally developed around 2008 and has evolved since then (Duncan et al., 2012). The tool consists of a focus group discussion checklist, a household questionnaire and a data app which generates standard charts summarizing key elements of the livestock production system and the place of feed within that system. The tool is designed to be applied at village/community level as a way of supporting appropriate livestock feed options based on data and farmer perspectives. One important part of FEAST is the constraint ranking exercise. For this, focus groups discuss important local constraints to livestock production and by consensus come up with a list of the top five constraints. These may be related to any aspect of livestock production and not just feed issues. Once the short list of constraints is agreed the farmer group is asked to rank these using a pairwise ranking exercise. This eventually leads to a ranked list of constraints agreed upon by farmers.For this analysis I used the ranked lists of livestock production constraints as raw data. Around 80 FEAST reports have been published and these report findings from 149 focus groups conducted in 14 different countries in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia and involving 2796 farmers (Table 1). Each constraint description was scrutinized and allocated to one of nine constraint categories and within each category to a further series of \"issues\" within each category. For example. feed, health and genetics were counted as broad constraint categories but within each there were distinct issues. Thus, the feed constraint might be about feed shortage in general or about seasonal feed shortage. The broad categories and sub-issues emerged through the analysis and were subjectively developed by me. Through this process a total of around 700 \"mentions\" of specific issues were counted. These were weighted by their position in the ranked list to come up with an importance score for each issue. The scores were allocated to ranks as follows: Rank 1 = 5, Rank 2 =4, Rank 3 = 3, Rank 4 = 2, Rank 5 = 1).Results show that of the major constraint categories identified in this study, feeding, health and \"infrastructure\" were the top three constraints (Fig. 1). The rankings were relatively consistent across global regions (data not shown). The infrastructure category was dominated by the issue of water shortage but also included poor livestock housing, lack of machinery and poor road infrastructure. Knowledge constraints also figured strongly in farmer responses and constraints related to breed quality ranked 5 th among constraint categories. Input/output markets and constraints related to finance ranked 6 th and 7 th on the list. Drilling down to the specific issues within these broad categories shows a similar pattern (Fig 2). General shortage of feed was the most-mentioned livestock constraint followed by livestock disease/pests. Knowledge on livestock husbandry and water shortage featured strongly as did breed quality and access to cash/credit. Intermediate importance was placed on issues such as quality and access to veterinary services, access to markets, grazing land issues, seasonal feed shortage, low prices for livestock products and markets for livestock. Concentrate feed issues, lack of forage seeds and housing were also of intermediate importance in the responses of farmers. A range of minor issues were also identified as shown in While the data presented is ad hoc and the coverage reflects the use of the FEAST tool it does provide a reasonably comprehensive overview of livestock development constraints from the farmer perspective across many countries, systems and farmers. Feed shortage is often cited as the main constraint to improved livestock productivity (Ayantunde et al., 2005) without much evidence, but this is borne out by the current data. FEAST is of course focused on livestock feed and this may have skewed the responses somewhat. However, the question posed was general and it was made clear that issues beyond feed should be considered. The \"Big 3\" constraints of feed, health and genetics all featured in the top five constraints mentioned by farmers as expected. Less expected was the very high importance placed on water shortage as a key constraint to livestock productivity. \"Water shortage\" covered a range of issues from lack of ready access to drinking water especially for dairy production but also lack of water for optimum growth of forage crops. Gaps in knowledge about basic livestock husbandry were also repeatedly mentioned by farmers and this constraint ranked 4 th on the list. This points to the need for renewed focus on basic capacity building on livestock feeding, health and breeding at the farmer level -no small task of course given the unfavourable ratios of farmers to extension workers. The data also highlight the importance of market quality and access to finance for smallholder farmers. These issues have received increasing attention in development efforts in recent years through application of value chain approaches to livestock development, but this analysis suggests that further attention to these issues is needed. The analysis has categorized constraints into a series of bins but this is not to suggest a piecemeal approach to livestock development efforts. If we have learnt anything in the last 10 years it is that dealing with feed, breed, health and market constraints in isolation is futile and that what is needed is to work with bundled intervention packages that address several issues simultaneously.","tokenCount":"1671"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1431273513.json b/data/part_2/1431273513.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b822de533534b7f51fe7d2a23b80acbca66fbe8b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1431273513.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"10733fc6863130345c208f2822bcbb4b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/7f641abe-c2e4-4d59-9051-37244c5adecf/retrieve","id":"1732997079"},"keywords":["www","climatesecurity","cgiar","org Africa Climate Crisis Security Observatory www","climatesecurity","cgiar","org Climate Security Observatory Series"],"sieverID":"cc9181a0-ec44-491c-8236-b5418b39b6d0","pagecount":"12","content":"This factsheet gives answers on how climate exacerbates root causes of conflict in Nigeria, using an impact pathway analysis. Three main impact pathways are identified:1. Resource availability and access pathway: Due to impact of drought and desertification on pastoral resources in northern arid and semi-arid parts of Nigeria, herders are pushed southwards, moving beyond their usual grazing routes and seasons, resulting in competition and conflict with farmers over access and use of arable lands and water resources; 2. Livelihood and food insecurity pathway: Vulnerability of Nigeria's Lake Chad region to climate variability could be understood as compounded by grievances related to severe livelihood, food and water insecurities, growing inequality, poor socioeconomic conditions, and political marginalization, reinforcing a feedback loop of \"climate-conflict trap\"; 3. Fossil fuels, environmental impacts, and livelihood insecurity pathway: Overall risks of insecurity and violence over oil in the Niger delta can be attributed to complex interactions between ecological, social and institutional factors, compounded by weak governance, poor implementation of environmental protection regulations, as well as exclusion of local communities from resource rents and benefits.Vulnerability of Nigeria's Lake Chad region to climate variability could be understood as compounded by grievances related to severe food and water insecurity, growing inequality, poor socioeconomic conditions, and political marginalization, reinforcing a feedback loop of \"climate-conflict trap\". Climate impacts, mainly in the forms of droughts and rainfall variability, affect availability and distribution of water and land resources, specifically through vegetation loss, reduction in arable land, depletion of grazing land and fish stocks. The complex interactions of climate with land, water, and food systems can then seriously undermine the viability of traditional livelihoods practiced by farmers, herders, and fishers in the area. Moreover, combined effects of climate variability and resource conflict may make these livelihoods differentially vulnerable. Large-scale internal population movements due to climate and conflict-related impacts on rural livelihoods have put serious pressure on urban infrastructure, leading to growth of slums and squatter settlements, that can then be linked with human insecurity risks such as food insecurity, as well as communal tensions, crime and violence.Fossil fuels, environmental impacts, and livelihood insecurity pathway Impact of climate variability on oil industry can worsen already existing conditions of poverty, inequality, political marginalization, and lack of trust for the government. Thousands of oil spill incidents have been reported over the last several decades, resulting in the spilling of millions of oil barrels into the environment. Oil spills in the Niger delta have not only degraded the environment and water quality, but also disrupted livelihood structures of local communities in the region. The associated loss of livelihoods can amplify human security risks through consequences like food insecurity, hunger and poverty, and create grievances and conflict.Overall risks of insecurity and violence over oil in the Niger delta can be attributed to complex interactions between ecological, social and institutional factors, compounded by weak governance, poor implementation of environmental protection regulations, as well as exclusion of local communities from resource rents and benefits.The Impact Pathway Analysis (IPA) aims to identify, describe, and represent the complex and nonlinear interactions between climate, conflict, and existing vulnerabilities and risks with a special focus on food, land, and water systems. In particular, the IPA intends to address the following questions:• What are the potential climate security pathways through which climate may act as a threat multiplier?• Which specific vulnerabilities and risks, that are at the heart of insecurity and conflict, may be exacerbated by the climate crisis?• How can dimensions such as natural resources, livelihoods, mobility, governance and food, land, and water systems, inform climate security pathways in specific contexts?The IPA follows a systematic literature search and review to find, collate, analyze and synthesize insights from relevant knowledge products, including reports, policy briefs, fact sheets from grey literature, as well as books, journal articles, and other sources of documented evidence in academic literature and public media. The construction of a narrative is then followed by consultation with a designated set of experts and stakeholders through interviews and written feedback to gather evaluation and incorporate suggested revisions.As a country comprising multiple ecological regions, and facing medium exposure to ecological threats (Institute for Economics & Peace 2020), Nigeria experiences high vulnerability in food and water sectors (University of Notre Dame 2019), especially from increasing temperatures and rainfall variability, along with risks from more severe weather events and sea level rise. Multiple pathways could be identified linking climate impacts to security risks. With parts of the arid northern Sahel area experiencing more heat and less rain, many parts of the country facing more severe weather with torrential rains, along with a nearly one-foot rise in sea level observed over the last half century over the southern coastline (Federal Ministry of Environment 2009), Nigeria could be facing serious resource shortages, compounded by problems like environmental degradation and inefficient resource management (Sayne 2011). Land scarcity could be connected with the process of desertification in the north, intensifying drought conditions, with adverse impact on agriculture and livelihood resulting in acute food and water scarcity. Water scarcity is exacerbated by poor water management, use and conservation practices (FAO 2009). This scenario stands in contrast to parts of southern Nigeria, where flooding due to sea level rise is leading to conditions of high salinity and water pollution with saltwater contamination of freshwater aquifers (Federal Government of Nigeria, 2003). Overall, vulnerability analysis has illuminated that \"states in the north experience higher degrees of vulnerability to climate change than those in the south\" (Madu 2016;Federal Ministry of Environment 2014;Haider 2019).As a country heavily dependent on oil revenues, Nigeria's economy has been hit by COVID-induced shocks, specifically disruptions due to oil price declines. With a major section of its population living below the poverty line, Nigeria continues to face serious developmental challenges, owing to inflation, unemployment, regional inequality, inadequate infrastructure, and weak governance (World Bank 2021). Along with climate variability and socio-economic vulnerability, Nigeria's population has historically experienced violence involving multiple actors, including tensions between ethnic and religious groups, armed insurgency, and government repression (Dorff et al. 2020). The landscape of conflict risks in Nigeria today can be prominently characterized not only by the violent actions of Boko Haram, but also by engagement of other actors like local militant groups and security forces.Following are the potential key pathways through which climate related fragility can inform risks of conflict and violence (Figure 1).Due to impact of drought and desertification on pastoral resources in the northern arid and semiarid parts of Nigeria, ethnic Fulani herders are pushed towards southern parts of the country, moving beyond their usual grazing routes and seasons, and even relocating for longer periods of time (Fasona and Omojola 2005;Azuwike and Enwerem 2010). Simultaneously farmers are trying to bring more land under cultivation in response to weather related shocks, resulting in land use changes and pressure on land. Such spatial and temporal collision of adaptation efforts may bring \"desperate guests\" (herders) and \"unwilling hosts\" (farmers) in confrontation with each other, resulting in competition over access and use of arable lands and water resources (Olaniyan and Okeke-Uzodike 2015; Akinyemi and Olaniyan 2017). Triggering effects of losses like destruction of crops by cattle for farmers or cattle raids for herders can create tensions between the communities, amplifying risks of conflict (Sayne 2011;Akinyemi and Olaniyan 2017). Though climate impact may lead to changes in pastoral mobility patterns and indirectly influence farmer-herder conflicts, it may not necessarily act as a direct predictor of ensuing violence (Madu and Nwankwo 2020). However, the role of desertification as a key contextual factor influencing farmer-herder conflicts in Nigeria is being increasingly recognized, alongside political and economic drivers (Lenshie et al. 2020).Nevertheless, together with socio-political and institutional factors, climate may act as a magnifier for conflict risks between the farmers and herders. Recent incidences of violence between farmers and herders have reportedly led to more fatalities than the Boko Haram insurgency. This is exemplified by the situation in Benue and Nasarawa states, with Benue passing an anti-grazing law restricting entry of migrating herders in farmlands, thereby driving thousands of Fulani pastoralists to relocate in neighboring Nasarawa. This ignited longstanding tensions between Fulani herders and the ethnic Tiv farming community, resulting in intercommunal violence in 2018, and necessitating state authorities to exercise legitimate use of violence (Eberle et al. 2020) Shared by Nigeria, Niger, Chad and Cameroon, the marginalized and volatile Lake Chad region presents a stage for multiple interrelated climate fragility risks (Nagarajan et al. 2018). Resources around the Lake Chad basin supports livelihoods of more than 45 million people, with Nigerians forming the largest population in the basin (Kombe et al. 2016). Observed and projected decrease in discharge of the Chari River basin, the main feeder for Lake Chad, can be mainly attributed to climatic factors and human activities (Mahmood et al. 2020). Temperature is predicted to increase, and precipitation is predicted to decrease over the next two decades (Mahmood et al. 2019) in this transboundary basin experiencing ongoing conflict dynamics. Vulnerability of Nigeria's Lake region to climate variability could therefore be understood as compounded by grievances related to severe food and water insecurity, growing inequality, poor socioeconomic conditions, and political marginalization, reinforcing a feedback loop of \"climate-conflict trap\" (Vivekananda et al. 2019;Schaller et al. 2020).Though water-related stress and uncertainty in this region have received significant attention, the complex loop has arguably remained relatively underexplored (Nagabhatla et al. 2020).Livelihood insecurity forms the key pathway through which this feedback loop operates. The northern states of Nigeria belting the Lake Chad Basin face serious risks of desertification and associated environmental problems (e.g., water pollution from tanneries and textile factories in Kano). Both agriculture and livestock-based livelihoods in this region have considerable water requirements, which explains the presence of multiple dams and irrigation projects on the Nigerian part of the basin, a factor that has likely contributed to depletion of fish species in the Komadugu-Yobe River (Kombe et al. 2016). Climate impacts, mainly in the forms of droughts and rainfall variability, affect availability and distribution of water and land resources, specifically through vegetation loss, reduction in arable land, depletion of grazing land and fish stocks. The complex interactions of climate with land, water, and food systems can then seriously undermine the viability of traditional livelihoods practiced by farmers, herders, and fishers in the area (Onuoha 2010). Moreover, combined effects of climate variability and resource conflict may make these livelihoods differentially vulnerable (Okpara et al. 2017).Lack of sustainable alternatives can push people towards activities like deforestation and shifting cultivation, resulting in further environmental degradation and biodiversity loss in this fragile ecosystem (Kombe et al. 2016). Left without sustainable livelihood options and support, a situation worsened by weak governance, unequal development outcomes, lack of public goods and services, political marginalization of the region, and conflict between state and non-state actors, often resulting in inhibited access to the basin's resources, people desperate for survival are likely to be recruited by armed insurgent groups such as Boko Haram (Nett and Rüttinger 2016). Furthermore, livelihood related stresses can have deteriorating effects on social cohesion between groups, within groups and even within families, fueling tensions, sexual and gender-based violence, and criminality (Owonikoko and Momodu 2020).Resultant insecurity risks around access to food, water, and income, amplified by the Boko Haram insurgency, can force people to migrate from affected rural areas to urban centers. For instance, Maiduguri, the capital of Borno state has received vast numbers of internally displaced people from rural areas, many of them finding shelter in IDP camps (Kamta et al. 2020;Kamta and Scheffran 2021).Overall, armed violence in the region, mainly fueled by Boko Haram's activities, has been identified as a prominent cause of displacement of hundreds of thousands of people from Borno, Yobe and Adamawa states. Together with livelihood erosion, these act as major drivers of out-migration from areas surrounding the Lake Chad basin. Some of the mobility dynamics from this region involve changing characteristics of pastoral migration, which as described above, can be linked with risks of farmer-herder conflicts. What is perhaps more relevant here is internal migration from rural to urban areas, as a result of climate and conflict-related combined impacts on rural livelihoods. Large-scale internal population movements have put serious pressure on urban infrastructure, leading to growth of slums and squatter settlements, that can then be linked with human insecurity risks such as food insecurity, as well as communal tensions, crime and violence (Fasona and Omojola 2005;Owonikoko and Momodu 2020). Persistent inequalities and fractionalization between a Muslim majority north and a predominantly Christian south, with overlaps between regional and ethnic group identities (Mancini 2009), can further fuel these risks.The presence of state security forces and local vigilante groups through the formation of Civilian JointTask Force (CJTF) can affect the state's capacity to respond effectively by addressing underlying vulnerabilities driving non-traditional security risks (Okpara et al. 2015;Angerbrandt 2017, Vivekananda 2018, Day and Caus 2020). Lack of formalization and proper implementation of environmental codes by the Nigerian government can further contribute to reinforcing this vicious cycle of fragility and violence (Kombe et al. 2016). Beyond conventional assumptions around insurgency in the north-east driven by grievances against the government, the role of factionalized political elites in this partial democracy, lending political relevance to a group like Boko Haram (Iyekekpolo 2020), could be considered for a deeper understanding of complexities underpinning climate-conflict linkages in this region.Regional diplomacy can be key for effective resource governance in a fragile setting such as the Lake Chad basin, with potential dividends for long-term peace and stability. In 2018, the Lake Chad Basin Commission (LCBC) adopted the Regional Strategy for the Stabilization, Recovery and Resilience (RSS)of the Boko Haram-affected areas of the Lake Basin Region, which for Nigeria include the states of Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa. Endorsed by the Peace and Security Council (PSC) of the African Union, the RSS focuses on nine strategic pillars of intervention, including areas of cross-border cooperation, human rights and security, humanitarian assistance, livelihood recovery and governance capacity among others (LCBC and AU 2018). Gaps related to funding, coordination between stakeholders, as well as longer-term implementation of the strategy would need to be adequately addressed to meet aims like replacing humanitarian assistance with sustainable livelihood support through climateresilient development efforts and investments (Planetary Security Initiative 2021).PATHWAY #3: Fossil fuels, environmental impacts, and livelihood insecurity pathwayAnother potential pathway would be the oil and environment related crisis in the Niger delta, as the oil industry is vulnerable to extreme weather events like storm surges. Impact of climate variability on oil industry can worsen already existing conditions of poverty, inequality, political marginalization, and lack of trust for the government. As Nigeria is one of the largest oil exporters in the world (Workman 2016), and the federal government is dependent on oil revenues, there is presumed to be a marriage of interest between the Nigerian government and oil companies. Thousands of oil spill incidents have been reported over the last several decades, resulting in the spilling of millions of oil barrels into the environment (Department of Petroleum Resources 1997; Inoni et al. 2006). Oil spills in the Niger delta have not only degraded the environment and water quality, but also disrupted livelihood structures of local communities in the region (Pegg and Zabbey 2013;Oshienemen et al. 2018).Oils spills have been reported to adversely affect the local economy, through decline in productivity of crops such as cassava and yam, and reduced availability of fish species. For example, the Ibani community of Bonny River in the Niger delta were among those dependent on fish and salt for internal trading in exchange for crops. With the discovery of oil, new infrastructure was built, but the development outcomes had detrimental effects on the environment, livelihoods and culture of fishing villages. Not only did spillage from oil industry reduce the stock of fish, as well as esem (periwinkles) and mgbe (mangrove oysters), it also resulted in pollution of rivers and waterways, causing irreversible harm to a fishing economy based on communal ownership of resources (Fentiman 1996).Environmental degradation, mainly water pollution and land degradation from oil extraction, also impacted farmers through lower agricultural income generation (Apata 2010). The associated loss of livelihoods can amplify human security risks through consequences like food insecurity, hunger and poverty (IPCC 2007;Elum et al. 2016).Lack of sustainable alternatives and livelihood support have then pushed people to migrate to other areas in search of employment. This process of erosion of traditional livelihoods, such as fishing, has damaged social cohesion, fostering frustration and grievances among community members, especially youths, who are recruited by oil companies and equipped with weapons to protect facilities, contributing to insecurity risks related to restiveness within the community (Oshienemen et al. 2018).Disproportionately facing harmful economic and environmental impacts of oil extraction, local communities such as Ijaws and the Ogonis have agitated and protested against the multinational oil companies and the federal government (Day and Caus 2020). This can then inform risk of further violence through state repression of oil-related protests. Overall risks of insecurity and violence over oil in the Niger delta can therefore be attributed to complex interactions between ecological, social and institutional factors (Boele et al. 2001), compounded by weak governance, poor implementation of environmental protection regulations, as well as exclusion of local communities from resource rents and benefits (Kankara 2013;Okpaleke and Abraham-Dukum 2020). Therefore, not only is there a need to adopt stricter measures of accountability for environmental degradation, but effective economic instruments could also be used to address oil-related insecurity risks and outcomes (Aghalino and Eyinla 2017).CGIAR aims to address gaps in knowledge about climate change and food security for peace and security policies and operations through a unique multidisciplinary approach. Our main objective is to align evidence from the realms of climate, land, and food systems science with peacebuilding efforts already underway that address conflict through evidence-based environmental, political, and socioeconomic solutions.","tokenCount":"2962"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1433192670.json b/data/part_2/1433192670.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2eddb66f0d27e3ad93540c57ff787ce50a95f63c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1433192670.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"de6d1ba5c2a2ce91b8b2044c4654d1e5","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/5d6e1417-b51a-43c8-9146-9011a950469e/retrieve","id":"-504224151"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b0c2da74-b8a7-4797-8f9b-220edc8149b0","pagecount":"57","content":"Zambia, like any other country, has been experiencing the effects of climate change across all sectors of national development, including agricultural production. Changes in climate and weather patterns include unpredictable rains, a shifting and shortening of the growing season, increase in temperatures, and longer dry spells. The production of maize, which is a staple food crop in Zambia, is predicted to decrease by up to 20% in some places by 2050. The importance of developing new varieties and maximizing the use of existing diversity is paramount for responding to climate change, as one of the strategies for adaptation. Accessing this diversity for climate change adaptation will be a key to ensuring farmers and communities adapt to climate change.This case study focuses on activities being implemented in relation to access and benefit sharing in the development of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture (PGRFA), and the availability of PGRFA for climate change adaptation. The study looked at the movement of PGRFA in and out of Zambia, and how international and national PGRFA developments have enhanced the resilience of Zambia's seed systems. Secondary data, obtained from the Genesys database 1 and the Secretariat of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA), was analysed to show trends in flows of PGRFA in and out of the country and within the country. Primary data and information on germplasm exchange was collected from key informant surveys with people from various institutions involved in research, conservation and extension.Using crop-climate suitability modelling, PGRFA that are potentially adaptable to present and future climate challenges were identified from national and international gene banks. A combination of climate and GIS modelling tools were used to match specific accessions to the climates of collection points, based on 19 bioclimatic variables.The study also looks at the policy and regulatory implications for access and benefit sharing (ABS) in Zambia, identifying gaps and recommending changes that need to be made at a policy level in order to facilitate access to and exchange of genetic resources for the benefit of farmers. The fact that millions of seed samples representing different genetic resources have been secured globally, and are available for use through the Standard Material Transfer Agreement (SMTA) of the ITPGRFA, offers an opportunity towards developing new varieties to respond to climate change. Germplasm introductions from external sources outside the country continue to be a major feature of crop development and improvement programmes for major crops in the country.The country now needs to ratify the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity (Nagoya Protocol/CBD), and to develop the necessary legislation, regulations and structures for its implementation. This will broaden access and benefit sharing to cover crops that are not currently included in the Multilateral System of Access and Benefit Sharing of the ITPGRFA (MLS). Consequently, iii ISSD Africa Climate-resilient seed systems & access and benefit-sharing in Zambia CONTENTSii ISSD Africa Climate-resilient seed systems & access and benefit-sharing in Zambia germplasm for all crops of interest to breeders will be available for exchange and use. But to achieve this, the Ministry of Lands, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection (MLNREP), which is responsible for the Nagoya Protocol, must work together with the Seed Control and Certification Institute (SCCI) and the National Plant Genetic Resources Centre (NPGRC) to develop guidelines for the implementation of the Nagoya Protocol. 3. Varieties multiplied by community seed producers using foundation seed provided by variety owners ....... an increase in the annual mean temperature, and maximum and minimum temperatures, since the midtwentieth century, with the most significant rises in temperature occurring over the last two decades. The report further notes that minimum temperatures have risen more rapidly compared to maximum temperatures over inland southern Africa (CDKN, 2014). In Zambia, where maize is the staple food crop, the production of maize is predicted to decrease by up to 20% in some places by 2050, under such temperature and precipitation scenarios (Schlenker and Lobell, 2010).Perceptions of the effect of climate change in the country are very much in conformity with the 2013 global survey findings of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), that climate change impacts on production, genetic resources for food and agriculture, and ecosystem services, and that there is a need in many cases to change species or varieties to respond to climate change (FAO, 2015). Ways of coping with increased climate stresses are needed, particularly with abiotic stresses such as heat, drought and flooding. The importance of developing new varieties is paramount for responding to the negative effects of climate change. The IPCC recognizes the use of existing diversity to adapt to climate change as one of the strategies for adaptation. Accessing this diversity for climate change adaptation will be key to ensuring farmers and communities adapt to climate change.This case study focuses on access and benefit sharing in the utilization and development of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture (PGRFA), and, specifically, PGRFA for climate change adaptation. The study looks at the movement of PGRFA in and out of Zambia, and at how international and national PGRFA developments have enhanced the resilience of Zambia's seed systems. The future interdependence of two communities, due to climate change, is also used to illustrate how climate change will necessitate access to PGRFA for adaptation. Finally, the study examines the current access and benefit-sharing (ABS) regime in Zambia, and the ways in which it can be improved to make PGRFA accessible for climate change adaptation.The study uses various approaches to analyse the flows and exchange of genetic resources at different levels: The study also draws upon case studies on the exchange of genetic materials between communities, and looks at how climate change drives the interdependence and exchange of genetic resources. Two communities, namely Chikankata and Rufunsa, were chosen for the case studies. Each community selected a crop based on its importance for food security and climate change adaptation, and its contribution to livelihoods. Chikankata selected maize, while Rufunsa chose sorghum. PGRFA potentially adaptable for present and future climate challenges were identified from national gene banks and international gene banks, using a combination of climate and GIS modelling tools that matched specific accessions to the climate of the collection points based on 19 bioclimatic variables. Accessions were then selected based on their similarity to the present or predicted future (2050s) climate of the site. These accessions were then made available to farmers for trials. Potentially adaptable germplasm from the communities and community seed banks (CSBs) were also identified in collaboration with farmers through participatory varietal selection and ranking.Finally, the study investigates the policy and regulatory implications for ABS in Zambia, identifying gaps and recommending changes that need to be implemented at policy level in order to facilitate access to and exchange of genetic resources for the benefit of farmers. ISSD Africa Climate-resilient seed systems & access and benefit-sharing in ZambiaZambia is situated on a large plateau between 8° and 18° south of the equator. The climate is predominantly sub-tropical, with 95% of precipitation falling during the wet season (November to April). Rainfall varies according to latitude and agro-ecological region, with over 1,200 millimetres (mm) falling annually on average in the north and northwest (Region III), and less than 700 mm in the south (Region I).Region II, the central part of the country, receives between 800 and 1,200 mm of rain annually. Average temperatures peak in October, and the lowest average temperatures occur in July.The past 40 years have experienced a slight reduction in annual precipitation, along with increased variability in rainfall year-to-year, and an increase in extreme precipitation events (Solomon et al., 2007;Kirtman et al., 2013). There have been more droughts and floods over the past 20 years, which have impacted significantly on crop production and crop diversity in particular. Both droughts and floods are believed to have led to some loss of crop diversity on farm (Mwila, Ng'uni and Phiri, 2008). Predicted impacts of climate change differ between the country's three agro-ecological zones, depending on rainfall.In the western and southern parts of the country, rainfall has been low, unpredictable and poorly distributed for the past 20 years, despite historically being considered a good cereal cropping area (Jain, 2007).Since 1960, the mean annual precipitation countrywide has been decreasing by 1.9 mm per month per decade, most notably in the summer months, and the growing season has been shortening (McSweeney, New and Lizcano, 2010;Tadross, 2009). The climate, including its precipitation and temperature patterns, is expected to continue to change over the next five to 40 years. In the coming decades, the temperature across Zambia, along with the entire southern African region, is widely expected to increase by up to two degrees Celsius (°C) (Hulme et al., 2001;Tyson, 1991;Christensen et al., 2013). Total annual precipitation is expected to decrease slightly, although the frequency of extreme precipitation events (causing flash floods) will probably become greater. The intensity of rainfall events and the time between them may also increase. In other words, this reduction in the frequency of rainy days could lead to longer dry spells interspersed with more intense, heavy precipitation, all without greatly altering total annual precipitation (Gannon et al., 2014).The effects of climate change in Zambia are being felt most by farmers, through extreme weather events such as droughts, storms, floods and cold snaps; and gradual shifts in rainfall patterns and sometimes temperatures. These observations have been aptly summarized by FAO in Table 1. Longer or shorter rainy seasons in the northern or southern parts of the country, respectively, are the main changes perceived by farmers. This is confirmed by meteorological observation, which indicates that rainfall patterns in Zambia have changed significantly since the late 1980s. In the south, the critical threshold has almost been reached, with only 130 days left for planting maize. This is insufficient for many varieties except earlymaturing varieties, which mainly have smaller yields. In the north, on the other hand, longer rainfalls often cause the maize crop to rot in the fields (Neubert et al., 2011). Planting varieties that mature within the duration of the season is therefore a major form of adaptation. In addition to shifts in varieties, crop ISSD Africa Climate-resilient seed systems & access and benefit-sharing in Zambia species diversification is also necessary so that areas that are no longer suitable for maize can shift to sorghum and millets as well as cassava, which are more resilient.The majority of Zambia's farmers lack the capacity, resources and financial assistance to adapt to and overcome worsening climatic conditions. The National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA) of Zambia highlights that Zambian communities are vulnerable to climatic hazards (such as drought, flooding, extreme temperatures and prolonged dry spells), which precipitate widespread crop failure, negatively impact food and water security and, ultimately, affect the sustainability of rural livelihoods (MTENR, 2007). Indeed, within the last 20 years, prolonged dry spells and shorter rainfall seasons have reduced maize yields to only 40% of the long-term average. Furthermore, based on the scenario in which carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) doubles in these regions, estimates predict a reduction in yield of approximately 66% under rain-fed conditions. The country therefore has to come up with strategies for adaptation to climate change not only at national level, but for specific communities in different agro-ecological zones (AEZs). The dominance of rain-fed agriculture in Zambia means that climate change poses a considerable challenge. The yield during a severe drought in 1991-1992, for example, was less than half that of the preceding season. Droughts in 1993-1995, 2001-2002 and 2004-2005 similarly had a severe impact on yields and consequently on food security. Global climate models predict that temperatures will increase in southern Africa by 0.6 -1.4 °C by 2030. Rainfall predictions are more ambiguous, with some models suggesting increased precipitation, and some suggesting reduced precipitation. Crop yields in the region ISSD Africa Climate-resilient seed systems & access and benefit-sharing in Zambia are expected to suffer as a result, with maize yields predicted to fall by 30% and wheat by 15%, in the absence of adaptation measures (Lobell et al., 2008).It should be noted that the impact of climate change on crop production is not limited to total rainfall and temperature effects: intra-seasonal rainfall variation is also important. A 'false start' to the rainy season due to erratic rainfall can be disastrous for crop establishment. Similarly, intra-seasonal dry spells may be more damaging to growth than low total rainfall (Kaczan, Arslan and Lipper, 2013).Major crops that are grown in the country are maize, sorghum, millet, rice (paddy), wheat, cassava, groundnut, sunflower, cotton, soybean, beans and tobacco. Of these, maize, the staple food, is the most important, and also faces a significant threat from the impact of climate change on its production.In addition to the many adaptation programmes taking place in the country, there are also efforts to utilize so-called climate-smart varieties, which are considered to be adapted to the changed climate. There is indeed scope in finding or developing varieties that may withstand increased temperatures or reduced moisture during crop production. The fact that millions of seed samples, representing different genetic resources, have been secured globally, and are available for use through the Standard Material Transfer Agreement (SMTA) of the ITPGRFA, offers an opportunity towards developing new varieties to respond to climate change.The FAO report on PGR and resilience to climate change (FAO, 2015), has outlined a number of technical adaptation actions that support adaptation and include the following: Actions involving change in species or varieties in production systems. The changes include direct selection of materials to meet changed conditions, and introduction of adapted materials (species and varieties). Diversification leading to increased diversity of crops or species, and use of trees in crop production systems. Improved and increased access to and availability of materials that can be used in adaptation. This has both policy and technical dimensions and is linked to capacity development.The Integrated Seed Sector Development (ISSD) Africa programme, in its assessment of the Zambian seed sector, identified five seed systems in the country (Nakaponda, 2012): Informal or farmer-managed system, in which farmers exchange and sell seed of traditional varieties. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that provide support through their projects to farmers engaged in community-based and entrepreneurial forms of seed production of officially released varieties that are certified by the Seed Control and Certification Institute (SCCI). National seed companies, which depend mainly on the CGIAR for germplasm for breeding, and engage both commercial and small-scale farmers in seed production of the released varieties of mainly food crops. International seed companies, which are involved in breeding and seed production of mostly hybrid maize and some cash crops. The export commodities-driven seed system, which is based on an out-grower scheme arrangement between smallholders and commercial farmers for cash crops, where the company provides seed of cotton or tobacco. The involvement of ZARI, which is a public research institution, contributed to the inclusion of openpollinated varieties (OPVs) that are more affordable and can be grown in more than one generation by small-scale farmers, while seed companies concentrated only on hybrids.Most seed sown in the country is produced locally by farmers who manage their own seed production. This seed is used by the household, exchanged or bartered with neighbours, kin or other communities (Mulvany and Mpande, 2013). By and large, most seed is informally produced, except maize seed for which there are many improved varieties on the market. Much more breeding for climate change is required to boost agricultural production in the country. Local varieties often yield less than improved varieties, though they may be better adapted to diverse and location-specific low-input agricultural conditions. They are also a source of seed security in case the improved varieties fail. Yet the farmermanaged seed system continues to decline as new improved varieties, particularly hybrid maize, are promoted in the government-driven Farmer Input Support Programme (FISP), to the extent that the conservation and use of local varieties or local knowledge associated with these crops and varieties, and also the maintenance and seed production of those crops, is threatened. It is important that traditional varieties and associated indigenous knowledge are given prominence in the identification or development of varieties that address climate challenges.Through community seed banking and custodian farmers, indigenous knowledge has been preserved in the communities. Currently, very few community seed banks (CSBs) exist in the country, though the term is also often erroneously used to describe seed stores for community seed producers who produce seed of commercial varieties in partnership with seed companies and NGOs. The role of a CSB is to provide a sustainable flow of local indigenous seed and associated knowledge, and to conserve local varieties. In Zambia, CSBs are also known to participate in the distribution of improved maize varieties; they act as intermediaries between seed companies and farmers because they are already organized and their seed networks are strong. Many CSBs are involved with seed companies such as Kamano and Steward Globe, ISSD Africa Climate-resilient seed systems & access and benefit-sharing in Zambia as well as ZARI, to produce maize OPVs, legume seed of groundnut, beans and cowpea, and small cereals like finger millet.Various NGOs have promoted community seed production of mostly open-pollinated improved varieties, which are released locally by research institutions, as shown in Table 3. It is important to pay attention to some seemingly illogical things that farmers do. Why are some varieties popular despite low yields? Understanding the decision-making process of the farmers can facilitate the development of varieties that are adapted to changing or unstable climates. Whenever a four-cell diversity analysis is conducted in a community, the cell with many households growing a particular variety in small areas generates a lot of useful indigenous knowledge, because this is the cell that will have varieties that may be overlooked commercially, but are very important to the community because of attributes that may not be related to yield or even marketing. Some of the reasons for growing these varieties may be linked to climatic factors, such as drought resistance or short growing season, food security, or taste and cooking properties. An example of a situation where farmers have applied local indigenous knowledge in the decision to plant, conserve and manage local maize diversity can be found in Chikankata where a fourcell analysis of maize varieties was carried out (see Box 1).Participatory research carried out with farmers in Chikankata, revealed that farmers had been experiencing higher temperatures and shorter growing seasons, prompting them to find local varieties that are faster maturing. A four-cell analysis of maize, conducted in Chikankata, showed that Bbilimba (Gankata) is cultivated by many households on a large area of land. This is because this variety is preferred for consumption and also has good commercial qualities, such as high yield, and large cobs and grains. Many households grow Kafwamba and Tandanzala on small areas. These varieties are very early maturing and are consumed during the peak hunger period of February/March before the main harvest. Much of these are consumed fresh during this period and therefore there is only enough seed to plant in a small area of land. The grain of Kafwamba is also multicoloured, making it unattractive for commerce. A variety called 'Kenya' is being grown by a few households on a large area because although its taste is preferred and it is relatively high yielding, most households still prefer Bbilimba. So, the few households that cultivate Kenya do so in order to trade locally. Balankana and Hampungani are grown by just a few households on small areas of land. Balankana is mainly cultivated to be consumed as a roasted snack, while Hampungani is cultivated for sentimental reasons, as it produces twin cobs even though yield is low. In fact, farmers indicated that this was once a lost variety because of very limited seed availability.Many households, small area -Kafwamba -Tandanzala Few households, large area -Kenya Few households, small area -Balankana -HampunganiIn addition, the custodians of these local maize varieties in Chikankata are mainly old men and women; for varieties like Balankana, which are cultivated for roasting, women are the main custodians. These custodians hold a lot of indigenous knowledge for their use, management and conservation. ISSD Africa Climate-resilient seed systems & access and benefit-sharing in ZambiaThe National Plant Genetic Resources Centre (NPGRC) is responsible for most ex situ conservation activities in the country. Currently (2015), the NPGRC has 7,278 accessions belonging to different crop species maintained as seed samples. The ex situ collection also includes 100 germplasm materials of cassava maintained as living plants in a field gene bank. Since 2001, the NPGRC has distributed 1,936 samples of these accessions of different crop species to various research and learning institutions, NGOS and farmers. These include maize, cowpea, sorghum, pearl millet, finger millet, beans, sweet potato, cassava, sesame and local leafy vegetables, as shown in Table 5. Germplasm accessions have also been distributed to farmers and individuals on request.The NPGRC has adopted the Standard Material Transfer Agreement (SMTA) for accessing PGRFA included in Annex 1 of the ITPGRFA, and has also developed a separate material transfer agreement (MTA) for PGRFA that are not on Annex 1, and for Zambian beneficiaries (See Appendix 1).From 2011 to 2012, ZARI partnered with Enza Zaden, a private vegetable seed company in the Netherlands, in the areas of germplasm collection, accessions regeneration and seed multiplication, with a focus on traditional leafy vegetables. As can be seen in Table 4, this company obtained a number of accessions, but the NPGRC has not yet followed-up to find out the fate of the germplasm provided, not just to this company but generally to all recipients of Zambian germplasm. This is purely an indication of inadequate capacity of the national gene bank to conduct follow-ups on the germplasm that it distributes. According to data from the ITPGRFA Secretariat, in the past eight years Zambia has received over 11,000 accessions of different crops held by international gene bank collections worldwide (Table 5). Most notably, the greatest number of accessions are of wheat and maize. In 2012, Africa Research in Sustainable Intensification for the Next Generation (Africa RISING) funded an 'early win' project in Tanzania, Malawi and Zambia, led by ICRISAT, whose aims were to increase production of both basic and certified seed for six target crops (maize, beans, cowpea, soybean, mediumduration pigeon pea and groundnut). The specific objectives were to: Accelerate the production of breeder and basic seed of improved varieties released by NARS. Build the capacity of NARS and small-scale private seed producers through investment in training in seed production, management and use. Foster public-private partnerships to increase the sustainability of seed systems serving smallholders.ZARI has been successful in releasing a range of hybrids and open-pollinated varieties, and the liberalization of the seed market has further contributed to the diffusion of a wide mix of varieties supplied -and sometimes planted -by numerous seed companies. Zambian smallholders have a long history of growing improved maize varieties, though adoption rates are still rather low. The national maize research programme and seed companies have released a wide array of maize hybrids since the 1970s.After the Zambian seed sector was liberalized in the 1990s, the number of released maize varieties proliferated, and seed companies have diversified. By the end of 2010, 203 improved maize varieties had been released (Table 6). Of these, the farmers surveyed in a Harvest Plus study conducted in 2011 (De Groote, et al., 2014) grew 106 improved maize varieties, as well as numerous local varieties and recycled hybrids. More than half of the farmers planted more than one variety, but few grew more than two varieties, and the maximum number of varieties grown during that season was five. Not one variety stands out as the most popular; not a single variety covers more than 10% of the area cultivated with maize, and the 20 most popular varieties together covered less than half of the maize area. About 16% of the maize area was taken up by local maize varieties. Agronomic characteristics are the most important criteria that farmers use when selecting a variety. Yield, drought resistance, and field pest resistance are by far the most important attributes farmers consider. Some of the varieties registered are new national varieties, some are varieties imported from other countries that are adapted for national use, and some are imported varieties, which have been developed by plant breeders in other countries and by the CGIAR centres. However, Zambia produces 80,000 metric tonnes (mt) of seed and is a net exporter of mostly hybrid maize seed. Less than one percent of seed sold in the country is imported and this is mainly vegetable seed (Thapa and Keyser, 2012). The situation is different for legume crops, where there is less demand for certified seed and therefore less production as farmers tend to use their own farm-saved seed for these crops much more than they do for maize.While the formal seed system concentrates on developing and marketing varieties for large-scale commercial production, there are examples of their contribution to farmer-managed seed systems. For example, maize germplasm from open-pollinated varieties (OPVs), developed by both the public and private sectors, is used in informal seed systems. For most self-pollinated crop species, such as groundnut, developed varieties are usually integrated into the informal system where the seed is recycled over many generations and exchanged locally in the communities. In this system, farmers only differentiate based on seed colour and size, and the maturity period. The varieties shown in Table 7 show a maturity range from 90 to 160 days, thus offering farmers a wide choice in selecting the best variety to suit the rainfall patterns. Sorghum and millet are important traditional cereal crops for food security in many parts of the country, and are largely grown by smallholder farmers. However, these crops face stiff competition from maize in the production system, mainly because of the massive support that maize production receives in the form of inputs and grain marketing. Maize is also the preferred cereal in urban areas, giving it a superior market advantage.Consequently, the adoption rate for sorghum and millet varieties by smallholder farmers is far less compared to that of maize. The changing climate in some of the areas where these crops have been displaced by maize will inadvertently cause a reversal of crop choices as sorghum and millets become much more suited to the new climate. This is especially true for the southern part of the country, particularly the valley areas that are getting hotter and drier. The response has been the increased number of sorghum varieties released in 2015, as shown in Table 8. For pearl millet and finger millet, there have not been many new releases in the last ten years, as can be seen in Table 9. These two crops, together with cassava and sorghum, will be expected to increase in production as communities respond to climate change. The use of traditional varieties is predominant in these crops. The development and use of climate-resilient seed will largely depend on the ease of access to genetic resources, governed by nationally and internationally agreed procedures for exchanging genetic resources and information. Approximately 6,391 accessions of various crops collected from Zambia are currently conserved in international collections hosted by various CGIAR centres that have signed Article 15 agreements with the Governing Body of the ITPGRFA. Those materials are made available under the SMTA. Information about those collections -and other collections, including those held by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and European national gene banks -is available from the Genesys database. Samples of 4,814 of these accessions have also been duplicated for safety in the Svalbard Global Seed Vault.The Seed Control and Certification Institute (SCCI) regulates seed production through the Plant Variety and Seeds Act, and provides for the protection of plant breeders' rights and the registration of plant varieties, through the Plant Breeders' Rights Act. Table 10 summarizes some examples of recent genetic resources exchanges between various stakeholders in the seed sector. CRS-Zambia has been implementing the Diversity and Nutrition for Enhanced Resilience (DiNERs) programme on variety deployment since 2002. In the first year, the programme used the formal and informal seed systems, concentrating on seed fairs to build links between communities and seed producers (certified and QDS seed of improved varieties). Demand for seed has risen (50% for maize and 33% for beans). Emphasis was on communication; it will further develop direct links with seed producers in the second year. This will be supported by SMS services and the distribution of small packets of seed.The aim of DiNERs is to provide access to information on available varieties for farmers, and also to varieties that are available as QDS seed. Like traditional seed fairs, DiNERs supports private sector linkages between rural communities and commercial seed suppliers. DiNERs will also ensure that rural communities can access diverse types of seed and other planting materials essential for improving household nutrition and increasing resilience in the face of climatic shocks. DiNERs has included seedlings of fruit tree species, indigenous legumes and vegetables and cereal crops. Access to varieties (released and local) of priority crops is made possible through small samples and vouchers at seed fairs. Small vouchers equivalent to between US$0.50 and US$5 are used to buy seed in small quantities of up to a total of $20 (Rwomushana and Heemskerk, 2015). The main objective of community seed production is to increase availability of reasonably priced, quality seed of popular crops. The major crops produced by the community seed enterprises are OPV maize, groundnut, cowpea, sugar beans and bambara nut. The key challenge faced is access to foundation seed, especially groundnut and bambara nut, and access to markets. The ability to source foundation seed in a timely manner is crucial for the success of community seed schemes. Contract production for seed houses is also practiced; for example, Stewards Globe Ltd contracted farmers to multiply a maize OPV that had been developed from farmers' varieties, and which is relatively drought-tolerant (Mulvany and Mpande, 2013).Functional linkages between the formal and informal seed sectors are needed to support the evolution of the seed sector in general. The informal seed sector maintains numerous local varieties of many crops and is the primary source of germplasm for new crop varieties developed by the formal sector, which produces commercial varieties using modern breeding techniques.A seed system security assessment conducted in eastern Zambia, led by CIAT, found that a very small cluster of crops dominates food production. On a basis of seed quantity, maize, groundnut and cotton accounted for 95% of seed planted (USAID, 2013). The assessment also found that there are challenges in accessing groundnut seed due to the limited production of basic seed of released varieties. Access to new varieties by farmers was limited to only maize and groundnut, with no farmer accessing new varieties of beans, cowpea or pigeon pea, all of which are popular crops whose diversification is essential for adaptation to climate change. ISSD Africa Climate-resilient seed systems & access and benefit-sharing in ZambiaCrop improvement for food crops has been taking place within the public domain of ZARI programmes supported by CGIAR centres. However, access to varieties in the public domain by smallholder farmers is problematic. The funding for public breeding programmes generally originates from the government and is inadequate. According to the 'Yellow Book ' of 2015' of (MoFNP, 2015)), which lists agricultural budget allocations planned by the government, only a paltry US$200,000 was earmarked for breeding, to cover all crops across the whole country, from an agricultural budget of about US$300 million. This level of resources is inadequate for increasing foundation seed to obtain a large enough number of varieties for the purposes of developing climate-resilient varieties for small-scale farmers.Other causes for the limited availability of these varieties for smallholder farmers are the lengthy and complex release procedures, quantity and quality problems related to breeder and foundation seed, lack of incentives for breeders to distribute varieties to the private and community-based seed systems, capacity issues within the national agricultural research system, and also the capacity gap in relation to access to variety release and deployment (Rwomushana and Heemskerk, 2015).Another related problem is the unsuitability of certain varieties that are developed without the involvement or participation of farmers, in defining the breeding objectives and determining priority traits. This ultimately leads to disinterest in the variety and/or low adoption rates.Some of the main observations made on this topic by ISSD Africa (Rwomushana and Heemskerk, 2015) are that: Africa has a heterogeneous population with diverse cultural values leading to many different demands and required traits of varieties. There is also wide variation in food habits. This makes the still-prominent form of breeding, which focuses solely on yield and market demands, unsuitable. The variety portfolio requires diversification in adaptation to needs and agroecologies, which is why the reintroduction of well-adapted local varieties from gene banks or other sources is important. Farmer preferences are so diverse that they cannot all be dealt with by breeders without the involvement of the farmers themselves, hence the need for participatory plant breeding. Farmer tests and trials on plant varietal selection are needed, involving male and female farmers, to identify suitable traits such as cooking quality, fodder quality, marketability, etc.Access to information on the characteristics and availability of varieties is one of the main constraints in accessing varieties that are available in the public system. Information on newly released varieties for farmers, as well as farmers' feedback on these varieties, is one of the traditional functions of public agricultural extension, but these systems are not sufficiently effective. Usually, limited information is available to both farmers and local seed producers, about which varieties are available and how they can be accessed.While plant breeders' rights are in place, farmers' rights and community rights are not formally recognized. Limited and inconsistent funding to ZARI and other public institutions responsible for the ISSD Africa Climate-resilient seed systems & access and benefit-sharing in Zambia development of improved varieties and their promotion, result in the limited availability of new improved varieties of important food crops suitable for the small-scale farmer.The supply of breeder seed and foundation seed of local crops and subsistence crops, to seed companies and other organizations engaged in the seed sector (e.g. NGOs, associations, etc.), is inadequate. The low rate of release of varieties for crops with less commercial value acts as a further disincentive. In addition, ZARI is still biased towards conducting crop improvement activities in which the private sector is involved in the breeding of crops such as hybrid maize, wheat and soybean. This restricted investment in crop improvement, and the inadequate access to materials developed by public research results in the limited use of quality seed of improved varieties of self-pollinated crops among the small-scale farmers.The need for policy initiatives to address challenges in PGRFA exchange 3.6.1 National seed laws and regional initiatives for the harmonization of international laws Until 1998, Zambia had no seed policy, and the Plant Varieties and Seed Act guided the operations of the seed industry. A national seed policy was developed in 1999 and embedded in the National Agricultural Policy: 2004-2015, which has since been revised. The seed policy and act provide a basis to regulate the seed sector through seed testing, seed crop inspection, variety registration, variety protection and the enforcement of seed quality standards to facilitate seed trade, quarantine, multiplication, and the protection of plant breeders' rights.The overall objective of the national seed policy is to ensure that quality seed of various crops is made available to farmers in an efficient and convenient manner to ensure increased agricultural production. The policy has identified the following measures and strategies to achieve this objective: Regulate the seed sector through seed testing, seed crop inspection, variety registration, variety protection and the enforcement of seed quality standards to facilitate seed trade, quarantine and other seed related issues. Promote the development of the informal seed sector by providing accessibility to breeder/basic seed from research, and coordinate the sector in creating a sustainable cottage (rural) seed industry. Regulate multiplication, trading and adoption of seed of genetically modified crops.  Ensure the protection of plant breeders', farmers' and community rights.As can be seen, the policy takes an inclusive approach in addressing formal and informal seed systems. It is at the implementation level that all efforts, including legislation, have tended to be lopsided towards the formal system.It is a requirement under current regulations that all varieties are subjected to up to three years testing before being released for sale. This includes varieties developed elsewhere and imported into the country for release. There is an ongoing debate on the value of this regulation, which is intended to protect the farmer but which the suppliers argue increases release costs as the source of the material is deemed to have similar climatic conditions as Zambia. This is one of the underlying reasons behind harmonizing seed ISSD Africa Climate-resilient seed systems & access and benefit-sharing in Zambia trade for the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA), where testing will only be carried out in two countries and thereafter varieties will become eligible for release in all member countries.The whole process of variety registration is also questionable, and the argument is the same, that this is intended to safeguard the farmer against inappropriate varieties. However, this also inadvertently blocks the inclusion of traditional varieties, regardless of how good and popular they may be, because there is no mechanism for including them since the criteria used to qualify a variety, such as uniformity, works against most of these varieties. If there is political will to include certain traditional varieties based on farmers' experiences and popularity, this would encourage other seed requirements, such as viability and seed purity, when this seed is being traded or exchanged.Currently, the seed laws specifically state that only registered varieties may be bought or sold in Zambia.In other words, only 788 varieties of various crops are allowed to be traded. This is in stark contrast to the rights that are conferred by the ITPGRFA on farmers to exchange and sell the seed of their varieties. Therefore, while farmers frequently exchange their seed, the scope to which this can be done is restricted by the inhibitory seed laws.Zambia participated in the Genetic Resources Policy Initiative (GRPI), coordinated and implemented by Bioversity International, which aimed to strengthen the capacity of developing countries to design comprehensive policy frameworks for genetic resources. A number of policy-related problems affecting the conservation, management and use of genetic resources were identified. These included inadequate appreciation of the value of genetic resources; limited knowledge on what genetic resources are available, their conservation and use; and low level of awareness on issues related to ownership rights, access to genetic resources and benefit sharing at all levels. In order to address these problems, three main activity areas touching on policy research and advocacy were implemented during Phase 2 of GRPI in Zambia from 2005 to 2007; these areas were: Creating awareness on the value of genetic resources and related knowledge, conducted through a range of activities focused on increasing understanding and awareness regarding the role of genetic resources in Zambia. Assessing conditions of ownership and access to local genetic resources, conducted through a range of activities aimed at the domestication of the ITPGRFA and associated policy development. Promoting the incorporation of traditional crop varieties in local seed systems, conducted through a range of activities aimed at promoting the role and value of traditional varieties at local and national levels.In 2008, ZARI informed the Secretariat of the ITPGRFA that it had placed a total number of 4,340 accessions in the Multilateral System of Access and Benefit Sharing of the ITPGRFA (MLS). The National Plant Genetic Resources Centre (NPGRC) has used agronomic and morphological characterization techniques to add value to some of the main collections, and has characterized 1,886 accessions of ISSD Africa Climate-resilient seed systems & access and benefit-sharing in Zambia sorghum, cowpea, finger millet, maize, beans and pearl millet in order to facilitate utilization of these genetic resources by the international community. These actions promote transparency and help other contracting parties to the ITPGRFA to understand the status and the importance of the collections within the MLS.While the country has made significant progress in relation to the ITPGRFA, it still lags far behind in relation to developing structures for implementing access and benefit sharing mechanisms, as agreed in the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity (Nagoya Protocol/CBD), which the country is yet to even ratify.The rationale behind harmonizing seed trade regulations in COMESA is to expedite regional trade and farmers' access to improved seed; overcome lengthy variety testing and release procedures before seed can be marketed; and obviate the need to comply with different national certification standards, and quality control and phytosanitary measures. One of the objectives is to increase drought-and heattolerant varieties to deal with climate change. Seed harmonization basically concerns centralized seed registration, streamlined and uniform seed certification, and a phytosanitary system designed to expedite release of registered seed in the region, availability of certified seed, and seamless regional cross-border trade.However, the harmonized laws impede trade of locally adapted varieties between farmers across the borders, giving rise to broader policy issues regarding facilitating and supporting a regional market for good quality and disease-free farmers' varieties, and special standards for the certification of farmers' varieties. The laws create an exclusive seed market for certified improved, commercial varieties of seed and excludes farmers' varieties from this marketing system.Small-scale farmers seeking to develop or maintain varieties, create local seed enterprises, or cultivate locally adapted varieties, are excluded from the system. There is a need to protect the trade in local landraces, and to overcome barriers to legal cross-border trade between farmers of local varieties (Keyser, 2013).Diversification is a measure to adapt to climate change, but it also helps to smooth out production and marketing risks as well as impacts of economic shocks. It is possible to cope with longer or shorter rainy seasons through variety diversification, which can also raise and spread income, increase soil fertility and enrich the nutritional status of households.One of the strategies outlined in the national climate change policy is to enhance farming systems that encourage crop diversification, including the cultivation and consumption of indigenous and more drought-tolerant food crops like cassava, millet, sorghum and sweet potato.ISSD Africa initiated a programme to contribute to increased access to public varieties for the private sector, and to coordinate donor activities in the development and deployment of public varieties. The objectives are to make more public varieties available to seed producers and farmers, develop licensing agreements and allocation mechanisms, and improve information and communication systems for variety catalogues. ISSD is also striving to increase the participation of the private sector (both formal and informal) in producing improved public varieties and making them available to farmers. The inclusion of PGRFA perspectives in national climate change adaptation planning is inconsistent, even though policies aimed at enhancing the availability of materials are crucial for climate change adaptation.Farmers have a long tradition of producing, saving and exchanging seed. The local varieties used are generally derived from mass selection, which consists of choosing those plants that seem to be the most interesting in a population, and using their seeds to plant the following season. The operation is repeated generation after generation, which makes it possible to improve crop performance progressively. The plants obtained are neither identical to the previous generation nor identical to each other. The seed obtained via mass selection contain heterogeneous individuals, which gives it abilities of adaptation and resistance. Yet these are considered inferior and don't qualify in the formal seed certification system, which only accepts homogeneity and uniformity. Farmers generally practice mass selection, even on commercial open-pollinated varieties. The government has to make a policy shift that recognizes and even rewards this form of varietal improvement as part of the whole system of crop improvement.Zambia is a member of the following international organizations or legal instruments: FAO's Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (CGRFA), which governs all agricultural biodiversity. The ITPGRFA, a legally binding treaty that has a multilateral system for access and benefit sharing and articles on conservation, sustainable use and farmers' rights. The International Plant Protection Convention, which aims to protect cultivated and wild plants by preventing the introduction and spread of pests and diseases. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), which sets the governance of biodiversity at genetic, species and ecosystem levels, within national jurisdictions. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB), which regulates the transboundary movement of living modified organisms such as genetically modified seed. The World Trade Organization (WTO) with its Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), whose clause 27.3.b requires all members to have systems for plant variety protection. The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), which governs the 'ownership' of traditional knowledge among other issues, and houses the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV), of which the country has been striving unsuccessfully to become a member. Zambia has its own Plant Breeders' Rights Act, 2007 3 , which protects breeders' rights and provides some exemption to small-scale farmers to allow them to continue with their time-ISSD Africa Climate-resilient seed systems & access and benefit-sharing in Zambia tested seed access and management traditions. To qualify to join UPOV, the country is expected to revise its law by restricting these farmer exemptions.Zambia has not yet ratified the Nagoya Protocol but has developed an MTA for the exchange of crop materials that are not included in Annex 1 of the ITPGRFA (Appendix 1).The country has struggled to fully implement all these international agreements, and in many cases fulfilled only partially some of the aspects, mostly due to limited capacity and resources. However, failure to implement some of the agreements has been mostly due to lack of political will, as has been the case with aspects of the ITPGRFA, where farmers' rights have been completely overshadowed by plant breeders' rights. During the initial process of formulating the draft for plant breeders' rights, drafts on farmers' rights were also being developed. It was, however, decided to separate the two at the point of enactment and no progress has been made on the latter draft since then.The ITPGRFA underscores the importance of plant genetic resources for food security. Through its MLS, it facilitates access to 35 major food crops and 29 forage crops. At the same time, it provides for fair and equitable benefit sharing arising from the utilization of these resources if the resulting products are not freely available for further improvement and research.The ITPGRFA reiterates the principle of national sovereignty over plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. The Nagoya Protocol recognizes the ITPGRFA as a special international ABS agreement. Thus, parties to the ITPGRFA are free to apply the Nagoya Protocol to plant genetic resources for food and agriculture that are not covered by the MLS. Zambia is not a member of the Nagoya Protocol, but even if it were, the Nagoya Protocol would not change the way Zambia would operate under the ITPGRFA.A holistic implementation of all appropriate international agreements would lay the ground for enhancing the conservation and utilization of plant genetic resources in the country, and especially for strengthening the link between conservation, variety development and adoption. By using these resources over the millennia, coupled with targeted selection and adaptation to existing conditions, farmers worldwide have developed a great deal of diversity within crop species. This is of crucial importance for the ability to adapt to future environmental conditions, continued development of varieties, and breeding to resist against disease and pests. Modern plant breeding depends on that gene pool that has been created over the years by small-scale farmers. However, the plant variety protection laws that accompany modern breeding can lead to a decrease in this multitude of agricultural varieties, if plant variety protection is enacted.Crop-climate modelling for maize in Chikankata and sorghum in Rufunsa (Figure 1) was carried out to identify suitable germplasm from within the country and internationally, for introduction to these areas. Modelling was conducted to identify materials that can be grown today and in 2050, when the climate is expected to change significantly. 2) show that both annual minimum and maximum temperatures will increase by almost 2 °C by 2050. Rainfall is also projected to increase significantly, from 786 to 1,100 millimetres (mm). The temperature and rainfall pattern in 2050 may still be suitable for maize production, but varieties adapted to higher minimum temperature during the growing period may need to be introduced (Figure 3). The annual minimum temperature is expected to increase by 1 °C by 2050 in Rufunsa, while the maximum temperature will remain the same; rainfall is expected to increase significantly from 839 mm to 1,262 mm (Figure 4). The minimum temperature during the growing season will increase by almost 2 °C, while the maximum temperature will reduce slightly (Figure 5). These conditions will suit both sorghum and maize but adapted varieties may need to be introduced. Using climate and crop suitability data, and passport information concerning the 300 accessions of maize conserved in the national gene bank (Figure 6), 48 accessions were identified as potentially suitable for present climate conditions (Figure 7), and only eleven were deemed suitable for future climate conditions predicted for 2050 (Figure 8). This demonstrated that as the climate is changing, a decreasing proportion of the national maize collection will be suitably adapted for future climatic conditions. This underscores the importance of the country having access to international collections for sources of genetic traits that ISSD Africa Climate-resilient seed systems & access and benefit-sharing in Zambia are adapted to future climatic conditions. This further justifies the country's participation in the international system of plant genetic resources conservation and governance. Looking at international gene bank collections (Figure 9) and using the same method, accessions of maize were selected based on their adaptability to present and future temperatures and precipitation for Chikankata. According to the maps, the accessions that are most adaptable to present climatic conditions are from South and Central America (Figure 10). However, for future climatic conditions, some of the accessions that were originally collected in Africa are potentially adaptable (Figure 11). Therefore, Zambia will need to look to its neighbours for germplasm. The number of accessions suitable for the future climate were lower than those for the present climate. Based on average temperatures and precipitation for present and 2050's climatic conditions in Rufunsa, accessions of sorghum were selected from a list of 176 national gene bank accessions (Figure 12), and from international collections, comprising 23,931 accessions of sorghum held by CGIAR centres and other gene banks, whose information is accessible from the Genesys database (Figure 13). According to the maps, the most adaptable germplasm from national gene bank collections is from the south-eastern part of the country (Figure 14). It is also evident that in the 2050s, as the climate continues to change and temperatures increase, the adaptable accessions in the national gene bank collections would reduce (Figure 15), requiring the necessity to look further afield. The crop-climate modelling exercise highlights the interdependence of countries on genetic resources with desired traits such as climate resilience. Table 11 below gives a summary of germplasm requirements, based on present and future climatic challenges. The table shows that as climate changes national collections from the gene bank will not be sufficient to meet climate-related challenges, but international gene bank collections will present an opportunity for the country's resilience; in the future, Zambia will need to access maize accessions from at least nine countries, and sorghum from four countries. The modelling exercise also reiterates the importance of being a member of the ITPGRFA, which provides for access to germplasm held in gene banks all over the world. This, together with the Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit sharing, makes the country less vulnerable to climate change by having a wide gene pool of germplasm available for plant breeding. Most plant breeding in the country is currently focused on maize, with both public and private sector participation. There are also some plant breeding programmes for sorghum and millets, groundnut, beans and cowpea.An important missing link for all crops, other than those addressed by private companies, is the access to basic seed of improved varieties. The community-based efforts of NGOs that are currently emerging may fill the gap left between the larger seed companies that focus on maize and the farmer-managed seed systems, thereby improving the availability of quality seed both for local and improved varieties for all crops important to food security in the country (Nakaponda, 2012).The government's FISP, and marketing support for maize, often distorts the decision-making process for farmers in relation to choice of crops and varieties. A case in point is the study conducted in Shibuyunji by Microthink Institute (Mubanga et al., 2015). Results showed that despite being confronted by late onset of rains, and post-germination crop attacks by army worms that made maize production extremely precarious, 61.5% of the affected smallholder farmers still replanted their cultivated land with maize. The farmers had a choice of whether to replant maize that had a ready market from the Food Reserve Agency, or to plant a drought-tolerant crop, such as sorghum or millet, which would have guaranteed them with household food security from their own production. They mainly chose the former option. They increased production of other crops such as soybean, sunflower and cotton when contract farming with private business entities became available. Markets determined smallholder farmers' crop production choices, more than household food security from their own production or the availability of climate information forecasting poor rainfall distribution. The study concluded that (i) prior knowledge of climate information does not necessarily result in a change of smallholder farmers' crop production choices in response to a predicted climate anomaly; and (ii) markets are a major determinant of crops cultivated by smallholder farmers, and hence adaptation measures involving crop diversification should be designed with market availability in mind.Access and benefit sharing of PGRFA, particularly for climate change adaptation, is a major precursor to achieving a climate-resilient seed system in Zambia. The movement of PGRFA in and out of the country has ensured that this resilience is not just being achieved in Zambia but in many parts of the world because of the platform made possible by the ITPGRFA and the Nagoya Protocol. Information about flows of PGRFA into and out of the country and within the country, from the Genesys database and the ITPGRFA Secretariat, shows the interdependence of countries and also the interdependence of research institutions and breeders from both public and private sectors.A suitable access and benefit-sharing mechanism is lacking, particularly in the context of PGR exchanges in local rural communities, which needs to be addressed. A process aimed at developing a national access and benefit-sharing mechanism has been initiated through a working group coordinated by the Ministry of Lands, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection. In order to formulate and effectively implement national access and benefit-sharing legislation, Zambia requires capacities drawn from a wide range of disciplines.Farmers' rights are considered critical to ensuring the conservation and sustainable use PGRFA. According to Article 9 of the ITPGRFA, the implementation and realization of farmers' rights rests with the national governments. Measures suggested under this article include the protection of traditional knowledge, equitable benefit sharing, participation in decision-making, and the right to save, use, exchange and sell farm-saved seed and propagating material. Not much has been done in Zambia to implement farmers' rights.Gaps in the policy and regulatory frameworks for ABS in Zambia have to be understood in relation to the facilitation of access and exchange of genetic resources for the benefit of breeders and farmers. The national policy and institutional framework must take advantage of the fact that millions of seed samples representing different genetic resources have been secured globally and are available for use through the MLS of the ITPGRFA and the Nagoya Protocol on ABS. Access and use of these materials by local plant breeding institutions will be enhanced by establishing functional institutional structures at national level. This is especially important because germplasm introductions from external sources outside the country continue to be a major feature of the crop development and improvement programmes for key crops in the country.There is a need for the national gene bank, which is the focal point for the ITPGRFA and the Nagoya Protocol, to liaise much more, under a structure that promotes information exchange and joint programming. The country now needs to ratify the Nagoya Protocol and to develop the necessary legislation, regulations and structures for its implementation. This will broaden access and benefit sharing to cover crops that are not currently included in the MLS under the ITPGRFA. Consequently, germplasm for all crops of interest to breeders will be available for exchange and use. But to achieve this, the Ministry of Lands, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection, which is responsible for the Nagoya Protocol, must work together with SCCI and the NPGRC, to develop guidelines for the implementation of the Nagoya Protocol.Legal frameworks on seed should also include acts or legally binding clauses to defend seed security, farmers' rights and diverse farmers' varieties and populations that contribute significantly to food security.","tokenCount":"9579"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1435094922.json b/data/part_2/1435094922.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..41de07f89047021348200e57d9f3c55678e7f6c9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1435094922.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"449accd3374c500cd1856a2fa9a3d673","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/0f2e7e14-b44b-4591-a953-80e9464d9c7c/content","id":"-22070254"},"keywords":["Puroindoline","Waxy proteins","landraces","KASP markers","Triticum aestivum"],"sieverID":"4714fb36-45be-4278-9835-66948fc87bca","pagecount":"10","content":"Grain hardness and starch are two of the most important factors that determine the end-use quality of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain. The grain hardness and amylose content are controlled by the puroindolines (Pina-D1 and Pinb-D1) genes, located on chromosomes 5D, and waxy (Wx-A1, -B1 and -D1) genes, located on chromosomes 7A, 4A and 7D. A total of 160 Iranian landraces from the Germplasm Bank of the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center were evaluated for grain hardness using near infrared spectroscopy to predict the particle size index (PSI). In addition, molecular markers were used to evaluate the states of the corresponding genes. Eight accessions were found to have a hard texture (predicted PSI < 45%); however, only two could be explained by null alleles either in Pina-D1 or Pinb-D1. Additionally, 152 accessions had semi-hard textures (predicted PSI range of 45% to 55%). For the Wx gene, only one accession (CWI 67665) showed the null Wx-D1b allele, while two accessions (CWI 67747 and CWI 57684) were null for Wx-B1b. Single nucleotide polymorphism and sequence tag site marker techniques were used. Our findings further indicate the importance of using these landraces for grain quality improvement in breeding programs.Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ssp. aestivum; 2n ¼ 6x ¼ 42, AABBDD) is an important crop worldwide and is estimated to be the staple food for 2.5 billion people in 89 countries (more than 30% of the world population) [1]. Grain hardness, starch properties and dough (gluten) viscoelastic properties are quality aspects that explain most of the variation in wheat grain quality traits [2][3][4]. Grain hardness or texture is one of the most important single factors determining the end-use food properties of wheat grain [5][6][7], and it also determines the marketing of wheat grain [8]. On the basis of this trait, wheat is classified into three main classes: very hard (durum wheat), hard and soft (bread wheat) [9]. Hard and soft wheat mill differently. Compared with soft wheat flours, hard wheat flours have greater levels of damaged starch, which leads to increased water absorption, something desirable for bread making [10,11]. In general, hard wheat is used for making bread and soft wheat is used in the manufacture of cookies, cakes and pastries [7,8].Grain hardness is genetically controlled by genes which have been reported to be located at the hardness locus (Ha) in the distal end of the short arm of chromosome 5D in bread wheat [8,[12][13][14], but in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum Desf. em. Husn.; 2n ¼ 4x ¼ 28, AABB) and other tetraploid species, these genes are not present, because of the absence of the D genome, and the complete deletion of these genes in the A and B genomes during the evolution of tetraploid wheat [13]. Studies have shown that the hardness (Ha) locus of bread wheat has a complex structure within an 82-kb region [13]. This includes two genes (Pina-D1 and Pinb-D1) that code for two basic grain proteins, the puroindoline a and b (Pina and Pinb) of $13 KDa, together with the grain softness protein. The Pins (a and b) are unique among other plant proteins because of their basic cysteinerich nature and the tryptophan-rich domains [6]. The presence of wild type alleles (Pina-D1a and Pinb-D1a) is correlated with soft grain in bread wheat, whereas nucleotide changes in the coding regions or deletions of whole Pin-D1 genes (null alleles) are correlated with a hard texture [15][16][17][18]. The gene polymorphisms lead to differences in the degree of hardness [19]. The literature indicates that genotypes harboring Pina-D1b/ Pinb-D1a have harder grains than genotypes that carry Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1b [20][21][22][23][24].Starch composition is another parameter affecting the processing and end-use quality of wheat grain. This macromolecule is composed of two types of glucose polymers, amylose and amylopectin [25], with a ratio of 20%-30% amylose to 70%-80% amylopectin [26]. The physical and chemical properties of starch (gelatinization, pasting and gelation) depend on the relative amounts of amylose and amylopectin [27,28]. Therefore, starches with different amylose/amylopectin ratios are needed for various industrial applications [29,30]. Environmental factors (such as temperature) and growth conditions can influence this ratio [31]. Granule-bound starch synthase I or waxy (Wx) protein is the key enzyme in amylose synthesis and is encoded in bread wheat by the Wx-A1, -B1 and -D1 genes, which are located on the 7A, 4A and 7D chromosomes [32][33][34].In recent years, several studies have been conducted to identify new waxy alleles in different wheatrelated species, such as einkorn and Aegilops [35,36] and in landraces [37] to increase the genetic resources used to develop wheat varieties with novel starch properties and end-use quality characteristics. Wheat landraces are important sources of genetic diversity that can improve the gene pools of modern cultivars by introducing new alleles [38][39][40][41][42]. Iran is one of the primary habitats of wheat's ancestors and is, therefore, a reservoir for new alleles. The International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) gene bank possesses $150,000 wheat and related species accessions, among which 48,600 accessions are of traditional durum and bread wheat landraces. This includes 6,947 accessions from Iran. The main aim of this study was to determine the distribution of Pin-D1 and Wx-1 alleles in a collection of Iranian bread-wheat landraces from the CIMMYT Germplasm Bank.A total of 160 Iranian bread-wheat landraces, held as accessions in the germplasm bank of the CIMMYT (Texcoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico) (Supplemental Table S1) were used in the study. The accessions were evaluated at the experimental field station 'CENEB' located near Ciudad Obregon, Sonora, Northwest Mexico (27_209 N, 109_549 W, 38 m above sea level), during the 2010 À 2011 cropping cycle under optimum growing conditions (full irrigation).Quality parameters were determined using the methods established by the American Association of Cereal Chemists [43]. The grain protein content (GPC, 12.5% moisture basis) and hardness particle size index (PSI, %) were determined using a near infrared (NIR) spectroscopic NIR System 6500 (FOSS-Tecator, HillerØd, Denmark), calibrated for protein content using the Kjeldahl method [43] and for hardness using the PSI method [44]. Soft wheat endosperm produces a greater proportion of fine particles that correspond to higher PSI percentages. Based on the predicted PSI data obtained by NIR, samples were classified as hard (30%-44%), semi-hard (45%-55%) and soft (>55%).Genomic DNA was extracted from young leaves of two-week-old seedlings grown in a greenhouse using a modified CTAB method described in Dreisigacker et al. [45]. The quality and quantity of DNA were evaluated in 1% agarose gels and using a Nanodrop 8000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) and the samples were diluted to a final concentration of 50 ng/mL.Sequences of PCR primers and fragment sizes are shown in Table 1. Each 10-mL reaction included 50 ng DNA, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.6 mmol/L of each primer, 0.8 mmol/L dNTPs, 1.5 ml 2.0Â PCR buffer and 0.05 U Taq polymerase (Go Taq Flexi, Promega Crop., Cat. #M8295). PCR was performed in an ABI Genamp 9700 PCR Thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, USA). The PCR conditions included an initial denaturation step of 2 min at 94 C, followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 94 C, 2 min at 60 C and 2 min at 72 C. There was then a final 5-min extension at 72 C. The amplification products were separated in 2.5% agarose gels.KASP is single-step genotyping technology that detects, using a fluorescence-based application, preidentified co-dominant and dominant alleles of both single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and insertion/ deletion variants [49]. The primer sequences and more detailed allelic information are provided in Table 2. For Pina-D1 and Pinb-D1, KASP assays were conducted in a 384-well format and performed in 4.2 mL reactions containing 2.1 mL sterile water, 2 mL 2Â KASP Mix, 0.1 mL assay mix and 50 ng of dried DNA. For Wx-B1, KASP assays were performed using optimized buffer that contained MgCl 2 (50 nm). PCR amplification was performed in a GenAmp PCR system 9700 Thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems) using the following cycling conditions: 94 C for 15 min for hot-start Taq DNA polymerase activation, 11 cycles at 94 C for 30 s, 65 C for 60 s (-0.8 C each cycle) and 72 C for 30 s, followed by 26 cycles at 94 C for 30 s, 57 C for 60 s and 72 C for 30 s. Then, there was a final extension at 72 C for 5 min. Endpoint fluorescent images were visualized using PHERAstar plus (BMG LABTECH, Germany), and the data were analyzed using KLuster Caller TM software (LGC Genomics).A wide range of predicted PSI values was identified for the accessions (Table 3), with most of the samples (152) having semi-hard textures (predicted PSIs ranging between 45% and 55%). Eight accessions had hard textures (predicted PSIs < 45%) and none had a soft texture (PSI > 55%).Primers from Gautier et al. [6] were used to amplify Pina-D1 and Pinb-D1 genes and detect possible differences in amplicon presence/absence and size. The amplification of Pina-D1 yielded an expected PCR product of $349 bp. Most of the accessions produced a PCR product of $349 bp (Pina-D1a), except for two accessions (CWI56592 and CWI72061), which produced no amplification products, indicating that they were Pina-D1b(a-null) (Figure 1a). These two accessions were classified as hard and semi-hard based on the predicted PSI values. For the Pinb-D1 gene, most of the accessions produced a PCR product of 250 bp (Pinb-D1a) (Figure 1b), except for five accessions (CWI For the Wx loci, all the accessions contained the alleles Wx-A1a and Wx-D1a in experiments using the markers MAG264 and MAG269, respectively, except for one accession (CWI67665) that had no amplification product, indicating Wx-D1b (null mutation) (Figure 2a). At the Wx-B1 locus, tested using marker Wx-B1, all the accessions contained the allele Wx-B1a, except for two accessions (CWI67747 and CWI57684), indicating Wx-B1b (null mutation) (Figure 2b and c).KASP primers were used in this study to identify the pina-D1/pinb-D1 and Wx-B1 genes based on sequences upstream and downstream of the detected SNPs (with the 3 0 end of the forward primer positioned at the mutant SNP site). For Pina-D1, two accessions (CWI 56592 and CWI 72061) shown in red (VIC) with null type alleles pina-D1b (A/G SNP) produced a hard texture in bread wheat. For Pinb-D1, five accessions (CWI 73113, CWI 57816, CWI 72525, CWI 71600 and CWI 57139) shown in red (VIC) with Pinb-D1b alleles (C/T SNP) produced hard textures. This identification is due to the codon change Gly-46 to Ser-46 and other accessions shown in blue (FAM) with wild-type alleles (pina-D1a and pinb-D1a) produced soft textures in bread wheat. No heterozygosity was detected (Figure 3b). For Wx-B1a, only one accession (CWI 67747) shown in red (VIC) had the null allele (Wx-B1b), and all the accessions shown in blue (FAM) had the wild-type allele (Wx-B1a) (Figure 3c).Bread-making quality is a key target of breeding programs. It is controlled by wheat genetics and the environment. Grain hardness influences wheat milling and flour viscoelastic properties [51][52][53][54], and it is used for marketing classifications [8]. In the present study, a collection of Iranian bread-wheat landraces held in the CIMMYT's wheat germplasm bank was analyzed for grain hardness using NIR calibrated by PSI and characterized at the molecular level by Pin compositions and Wx genes. The accessions were classified into hard and semi-hard wheat. In eight of the accessions showing a hard grain texture, two could be explained by a null mutation in either Pina-D1 or Pinb-D1, which corroborated earlier findings [24,55,56]. Accessions harboring Pina-D1 null alleles may be harder than those with other Pin alleles, such as Pinb-D1b [23,57], and have low milling yields [19,22,23]. This mutation has been reported in numerous studies worldwide [16, 24, 49, 57-62]. However, our result did not show differences in grain hardness between Pina-D1b and Pinb-D1null [63]. In this study, the findings may have been influenced by the following: 1) environmental conditions and grain size [14,[64][65][66][67]; however, Pomeranz et al. [68] showed that hardness-related measurements were more affected by genotype than by environment; 2) other minor genes [23,[69][70][71]; 3) the limited accuracy of NIR to predict PSI; 4) the limited number of accessions with different Pin-D1 alleles and the different genetic backgrounds of the accessions, which led to unidentifiably small differences owing to the presence of different Pin-D1 alleles [53]. Grain protein content is directly related to grain hardness [14,58,70,[72][73][74]. In the present study, the grain protein content was 15.7% on average. Thus, it was not surprising that few of the accessions showing hard grain phenotypes had protein contents of $15.43%. (data not shown).However, Symes [75] reported that the correlation between protein content and hardness was positive in some cultivars and negative in other cultivars, which was corroborated by our results.Starch composition is another parameter that affects the processing quality and is controlled by Wx genes (Wx-A1, -B1 and -D1). All the accessions contained the allele Wx-A1a with the marker MAG264, which is similar to the results obtained by Liang et al. [76]. In our study, all the accessions contained the allele Wx-D1a with the marker MAG269, and only one accession (CWI 67665) indicated the presence of Wx-D1b (null mutation). However, the lack of Wx-A1 or Wx-D1 protein does not always lead to a significant decrease in the amylose content [34,77], while the absence of Wx-D1 has a greater effect compared with that of Wx-A1 [78]. At the Wx-B1 locus, using primers designed by Saito et al. [48] and Mclauchlan et al. [47], complete deletions of the gene existed and most accessions harbored the Wx-B1a allele, except two accessions (CWI67747 and CWI57684). Yamamori and Quynh [78] reported that Wx-B1b induced a lower amylose content, which was in agreement with an earlier finding [79]. They also analyzed the effects of Wx proteins and ranked the single null genotypes as Wx-B1b > Wx-D1b > Wx-A1b. Molecular characterizations of wheat waxy proteins and their effects on starch properties, as well as the detection of Wx null mutations, have been widely studied [47,48,[80][81][82][83], which is important for the identification waxy wheats in breeding programs [84]. The majority of KASP markers found in the CIMMYT used in this study were derived from the Pin-D analysis and were in agreement with the STS markers. KASP can be used for genotyping a wide range of species for various purposes that can help the development of grain quality.Molecular markers for Pin-D1 and Wx genes are imperative to wheat molecular breeding programs, because their different allelic compositions lead to different hardness levels [85] and amylose contents, which affect the end-use food quality of wheat grain [21]. Codominant and dominant markers are preferable for introducing null alleles into grain hardness and Wx proteins. The use of traditional gel-based PCR markers is time-consuming and results in a relatively low throughput, compared with more recently developed methods. The results of this study provide a deeper insight into the molecular and KASP markers that can be used to characterize grain hardness and Wx genes in bread wheat. Moreover, landraces offer an important genetic resource that can be used to improve modern varieties of wheat by means of introducing new alleles or a combination of genes.Waxy genes, including three null alleles, were found in the Iranian landrace collection described in this study. These alleles may be used to modify starch properties by adjusting of the standard amylose/amylopectin ratio, thereby enhancing the functionality of wheat flour doughs to improve traditional or novel wheatbased foods. In addition grain hardness is of paramount importance to wheat processors, end-users and those involved in wheat breeding and improvement. To this end, null alleles of puroindoline genes were determined in this collection of Iranian landraces. The results, therefore, provide evidence that these genetic materials are important sources of genetic diversity for developing wheat cultivars with improved grain textures.","tokenCount":"2606"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1453467296.json b/data/part_2/1453467296.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..be648d3ed378391b7e4e10e80d300a1382766e11 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1453467296.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"c5d2000de46bda9c594259c0ab819b66","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/fca7d236-f6cb-49ef-9379-137f44507775/retrieve","id":"-1521312906"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"c493d0ad-4b06-4d6c-af33-86b4ba50d4aa","pagecount":"26","content":"de los suelos , l a obtención de híbr i dos y vari edades cor. mayor putcrrial de pr c•ducción que los sembrddcs dCtua l mente, la generación cada vez mas crecient e de informaci{,rr sobre técnicas de lc;boratorio, ca l ibración de análisis, respuesta at l0s cultivos en el 」 。 ョ セ ッ N @ y e l cos t o cado vez mayur de l os fert i lizantes, son al9unos de lu s ,,;ás ゥ ュ ー ッ Q ᄋ セ ョ ョ エ ・ ウ @ asrectos relaci or.ados cun el problema . La conceptuc.:th.> rot:n como objetivo prest•ntar a ュ 。 ョ セ イ 。 @ de introducción, un ¿sfuer zos pura mejor•or las técr•icJs de laboratorio y los cri terios de inte r pr etacióro, con los ・ ウ ヲ オ ・ イ セ ッ ウ @ ori e ntados a tener uua r.1ayor 、 ゥ ウ ー 」 イ セ ゥ 「 ゥ @ l idoc dA grados . :dr.lbién pone en duda denur.1inaci ones muy cornunes , ti! l es como: \" fertill<:ér: te arr ocero\", \"yrado cafet.erc\" , ー オ ・ セ @ el l as suponen que \"todos le c; セ オ ・ ャ ッ ウ @ a rroceros o todos lo!; s uelos ca ft:teros\" son i guales, 。 ← ・ イ Z N セ ウ @ de \"ur•a supuesta igua l dad en la can t ioad d\" nutriment os extra;cos por ャ セ ウ @ difer entes varieaades , l í neas, etc . , de un aduda, e l mejo r criterio pdrd l..: recomendac ión de ferti l izantes, pe ro un problerréJ import..tr.tP en este caso , es la extrdpolac i én セ @ re su tt.;dos . La zon ificac i úr. C:P ambientes t:Speciair.rente con ba se en el suel o y e l clirnd dett: de consti tuir e l criterü. pa r o ャ セ @ loralizcH ij:1 de pruebas experin 1 u.Lcrles y la t>trapo l acióll de los イ ・ セ l イ ャ エ 。 、 ッ ウ N @Todavía se co ntinúdn aceptando y divulgdndo hipótesis 。 ョ エ ゥ N [ ᄀ オ L セ @ y equivocddJS sobre l a u racterizución de un >t.:el u , hipó ::es i s que conducen d erróneas recomendaci ones . 6.La recomendación de ferti l izantes se ha enfocado casi excl usivamente hac i a el ni trógeno, el fósforo y el potasio . Como consecuencia ex i st e m ucho desconoc i miento sobre nutri me ntos secundarios , mi cron utrimentos . 7. Existen confusi ones y dudas entre l os técnicos cuando se trata de dar enfoques prácticos para el t ratam i ento del problema, ・ ウ ー ・ 」 ゥ 。 ャ ョ セ ョ エ ・ @ si se carece del apoyo de datos experimentales .8. La sel ección de especies y de ecotipos dentro de especies, constituye una al ternati va de i nterés creciente para solucionar el problema.La conceptua l ización anteri or sugiere que hay necesidad de \"ganar conci encia\" ace rca de la rea l i dad del problema de la recomendación de fertil i zantes para consegu i r nuevas alternativas de solución más r ac ionales y ajustadas a la realidad de la evaluación de la fertilidad de l os suel os, al comportamiento biológi co de ャ 。 セ @ plantas que se cultivan y al aspecto económi co de la solución.Bases pa ra una propuesta práctica de solución al problema Teniendo en cuenta lo anterior , se pretende recordar los criterios que debe n co nsiderarse para aj ustar más a la realidad y con sentido pr5ctico , la recome ndación de fertilizantes. Estos criterios son: l.La cantidad de nutrimentos que tiene el suelo.2. l ッ セ @ requerimientos nutrici onales del cu l tivo; lo s conceptos de \"exportaci ón\" y \"potencial de producción\".La eficiencia del fertilizante en función de l suelu.4. El aspecto económico de la fertilización.T. La ca nt i dad de nutrimentos que tiene el suelo:La cant i dad de nutrimentos que tiene el suelo es determinada mediante el análisi s quí mico del suelo. Forsythe y Díaz-Romeu (11), indican que es necesa r io \"poder transformar l os resul tados del laboratorio en térmi nos de l a capa arable , para que los análisi s de lahoratorio tengan valor en el campo. El éxito de dicha transformaci On depende del conocimiento de l a densidad aparente de la capa arable\". Sin embargo , se está comet 1endo un error al seguir aceptando la suposición ya tradicional de \"una hectárea ae suelo a la profundidad arab l e de 0-20 cm, pesa 2.000.000 kg\". Esta suposic ión se basa en una de ns i da d aparente promedi o de 1 gr/cm3 . Mas aún , ni siquiera existe acuerdo ace rca de este valor promedio de densidad aparente. La literatura cita va l ores de 1 gr /cm3 , 1.47 gr /cw3 . Para f>vitar toda esta situac ión lo recomendab l e es \"deteminar la verdad2ra densidad aparente* por \"zonas, tipos o series\" y utilizar el valor determinado para todos los 」 セ ャ 」 オ ャ ッ ウ @ posteriores. Esta densidad aparente puede variar entre 0.3 y 2.0 gr/cm3. \"En casos especia 1 es, para andoso 1 es, derivados de ce ni zas volc&nicas, con alta porosidad, los valores de la densidad aparente son excepcionalmente bajos: 0.30 a 0.85 gr/cm3. Guerrero, cita los siguientes ejemplos para suelos de la zona cafetera central de Colombia: Chinchín& 0.8 gr/cm3, Quindio 0.95 gr/cm3, Montenegro 1.0 gr/cm3, Fresno 0.63 gr/cm3.A manera de ejemplo se comparan contra el peso/ha tradicionalmente usado de 2.000 . 000 kg, los pesos reales obtenidos para cuatro suelos con densidades aparentes de 0.8, 1.3, 1.7 y 1. 9. (Cuadro 1). */ La densidad apa rente relaciona el peso seco del suelo con su volumen incluyendo los espacios porosos . Por lo tanto, considera el volumen de las part1culas y el volumen ocupado por los poros; este volumen se 11 ama \"vo 1 umen aparente\" ( = vo 1 umen verdadero + porosidad); no es un valor que permanece constante en cada suelo. Sufre cambios segú n se altere el volumen de los poros. Entre l os métodos más usados para determinar la densidad aparente se tiene el de la parafina que consiste en envolver un terrón de suelo en parafina de den s idad conoc ida. t 。 ュ 「 ゥ セ ョ @ se emplean cilindros de PVC de 7 cm de altura y de 6 cm de diámetro, que dan un volumen de 197.9 cm3 (González et al , citados por Legarda) . En cambio la gravedad especHica o densidad real o peso especHico del suelo se refiere so l amente a la parte sólida del suelo. Su valor estA entre 2. 5 y 2.6; con mucha materia orgánica baja.No hay necesidad de muchos comentarios . Basta sol amente indicar que no se pueden seguir aceptando errores de 1.800.000 kg en la estimación del peso de una hectárea de suelo, como ウ ・ イ セ 。 @ el caso del suelo D. Estos errores, en forma directa, conducen a otros nuevos errores, bien sea por subestimación o sobreestimación en los cá lculos de la cantidad de nutrimentos presentes en la capa arable. El si guiente error seda la sube stimac ión o sobreestimación de los respectivos fertilizantes, correctivos o mejoradores.Una aplicación inmediata de esta co rrecc1on ウ ・ イ セ 。 @ la de \"olvidar\" cifras o factores que también en forma tradicional se han venido usando, bajo la suposición de que un a hectárea de suelo pesa 2.000 .000 de kg.:1 me de K/100 gr de suelo 1 me de Mg / 100 gr de sue l o 1 me de Ca/100 gr de suelo Si l os requerimientos nutricionales de un cultivo, por ejemp lo para el caso del potasio, fueran de 150 kg de K/ha , en el caso de usar la cantidad de K obtenida con la \"situación co nvenci onal\", la decisión sería fertil izar con K (109 kg < 150 kg) . Pero si se considera la situación real, el suelo tendría más K del requerido (174 kg > 150 kg), y por lo tanto no habría neces idad de fertilizar. Una dificultad más común, en el problema de la recomendación de fertilizantes, es el procesamiento de la información. Con frecuencia l a informac i ón que viene de los laboratorios en forma de \"resultados de un análisi s de suelos\", se convierte en un papel indescifrable, y por lo mismo, de muy poca utilidad. El objetivo de los cuadros 3, 4 y 5 adaptados de Guerrero (15) y Forsythe -Díaz -Romeu (11) , es facilitar ciertas conversiones y transformaciones, que permitan un usoOtra fuente :de error en los cálculos relacionados con el análisis qu1mico de l suelo está en la profundidad de las raí ces \". Algunos utilizan 0-15 cm , otros 0-20 cm y hasta 0-40 cm para el caso de árboles frutales. De nuevo la solución está en el conocimiento real de la distribución de ra1ces del cultivo respec tivo, aspecto que normalmente ha recibido escasa atención por parte de los investigadores*.Finalmente al discutir el aspecto relacionado co n la cantidad de nutrimentos que tiene el suelo, necesa ri amente hay que co nsiderar el poco énfasis que se ha dado a los nutrimentos secundarios y a los Cuadro 3.Peso en kg/ha de una hectárea de suelo profundidad 0-20 cm, a diferentes densidades aparentes. La cantidad de nutrimentos a aplicar al suelo para obtener una producción óptima, que en general se define como el 95% de la producción ュ セ ク ゥ ュ 。 N @ Esta definición de requerimiento nutricional equivale al \"requerimiento de fe rtilizantes y varía de un suelo a otro. c.La concentración de nutrimentos en el suelo o en el medio o en la solución nutritiva {requerimiento externo) o en la planta {requerimiento interno) que corresponde con una producción óptima. Esta definición de \"requerimiento nutricional\" equivale a los \"niveles crHicos\" en el suelo o en la planta, o sea , la conce ntración de un nutrimento por debajo de la cua l la planta responderá a la aplicación de ese nutrimento y por encima de la cual no se espera ninguna respue sta.Finalmente, Howeler {17), indi ca que se cons idera que el nivel crítico es una característica bastante constante de la especie aunque sí puede variar algo entre variedades de la misma especie.Además varía entre diferentes órganos de la misma planta, y con la edad del tejido; l o afecta también la presencia o ausencia de otros nutrimentos y las condiciones ambientales como la temperatura, lluvias, etc. Constituye, por lo tanto, otro error el usar datos de extracción -absorción de nutrimentos obtenidos con una determinada variedad y un cierto ambiente, para calcular las necesidades de fertilizantes en otras variedades y otros ambientes . El Cuadro 6 muestra las diferencias en absorc ión obteni da s para N, P, K para algunas variedades de frijol, Es importante agregar que siempre que sea posible, los datos de absorción deben relacionarse con el niv el o niveles de rendimiento. Por otra parte es muy importante considerar la eficiencia de híbridos y/o variedades dentro de la misma especie para usar un nutrimento del suelo o del ferti lizante aplicado. Sali na s y Sánc hez (24) , indican que en los últimos años se ha reconocido la existencia de diferencias entre especies y variedades para tolerar factores adversos del suel o. Las más notables son las diferencias existentes entre variedades en cuanto a resistencia a la sequía y a elevados niveles de saturación de alumini o en el suelo. El hecho de que genes específicos hayan sido identi ficados como reguladores de algunos de estos factores, sugiere que la tolerancia varietal a condiciones adversas del suelo, puede ser incorporada como objetivo específico en el mejoramiento de plantas. El cuadro 7, {CIAT, 5), muestra algunos avances del programa de frijol del CIAT en su esfuerzo por bu scar materiales que toleren condiciones adversas de suelo como bajo P y alto Al, materiales estudiados en la localidad de CIAT-Quilichao.Thung {27) , ha clasificado los cu l t i vares de Phaseolus vu lga ris en cua tro categorías, de acuerdo a la \"eficiencia\" en el uso de Cuadro 6.Diferencias en absor ción de nutrimentos en frijo l común. Figu ra 1. Eficiencia y respuesta del frijol común a las aplicaciones de fósforo. E = eficiente, 1 = ineficiente, R = con respuesta, N = sin respuesta (CIAT, 5).Finalmente Salinas y Sánchez (24), indican que \"como resultado de la respuesta diferencial entre especies y variedades , surgió durante los últimos años la filosona de insumas mínimos e n fertilización. Este enfoque no debe ser interpretado como la eliminación total de una fertilización , pero sí como una alternativa que reduce los ni veles de fertilizantes en func i ón del requerimiento nutrici onal de una especie dada.Una propuesta de solución para esta nueva parte del problema de la recomendación de fertiliza ntes, es la necesidad de adelantar estudios locales de absorción de nutrimentos. La obtenci ón de la curva de absorción es el pri me r objetivo de estos estudios , pero el é nfasis debe ser ori entado hacia la obtenc i ón de una curva, basada en las etapas de desarrollo de la planta y no en el \"número de días después de la emergencia\" como frecuentemente se ha hecho. La figura 2 , describe l as curvas de absorción de N, P, K para porrillo sintético. En el eje horizontal se han usado en este caso \"etapas de desa rrollo\" y \"días después de emergencia\", sólo para ilustrar las dos situaciones mencionadas. Desde el punto de vista de absorción es importante revisar los trabajos de Haag, Cobra, Blasco y Pinchinat, citados por Howeler (16). (Ver Figura 3).* 1 Para mayor información se recomienda consultar los a rt í cu l os \"Thung , M. 1981, \"Metodología simultánea de \"screening\" po r l a eficiencia en el uso de bajos niveles de fósforo y por l a tolerancia a tox i cidad de a lumini o y ma nganeso en suel os adver sos pa r a frijol \" y Th un g M., J . Rod ríguez y J . Ortega, 1981. \"Efecto de la forma de ap 1 i caci ón de fósforo en s u efici encia y aprovechamiento por distintas vari¡!dades de frijol ( Phaseol us vulgaris) . Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, CIAT. 18 25 32 39 46 53 69 67 74 Oí as después de emergencia Los estudios de absorción ー ・ イ ュ ゥ エ ・ セ @ la obtención de los requerimientos nutricionales o ex1gencias minerales. La absorción o extracción, a un nivel deseado de rendimiento, puede obtenerse multiplicando el requerimiento interno del nutrimento por el total de materia seca producida a los niveles de rendimiento deseados. Malavolta {23), indica en el cuadro 8, los requerimientos en condiciones tropicales para el arroz, el maíz, el algodón, el frijol, l a soya y el tomate.Fernández y Ceballos {*) estudiaron la absorción de N en la variedad Porrillo s intético, Figura 4. Según Graham (13}, inicialmente la planta de frijol puede obtener parte de su nitrógeno de l os cotiledones , pues una semilla de frijol contiene entre 6 y 20 mg de N, pero alrededor de los 14-20 días y si no recibe fertil ización, mostrará los primeros síntomas de deficiencia. Al mismo t iempo empieza el proceso de nodulación, proceso quepuede ser danado por el exceso de nitrógeno. Como los nódulos no f i jan bien hasta los treinta días aproximadamente , entonces en este período puede ocurrir un déficit de N. Desde los treinta días y hasta ュ セ ウ @ o menos los cincuenta días, las necesidades de N aumentan casi linealmente. Con la formación de las vainas , buena parte del N de las hojas de la planta pasa a l as semillas, causando disminución en la actividad fotosi ntética y eventualmente su caída, fenómeno que algunos consideran como un mecanismo de suicidio. Los requerimientos nutricionales indican la cantidad de nutrimentos que la planta necesita para completar su desarrol l o. Esta cantidad de nutrime ntos debe ser suministrada por el suelo, o por el suelo y los fertilizantes, y en el caso del nitrógeno debe considerarse también al aire.Por ejemplo en las localidades de p ッ ー 。 ケ セ ョ @ y CIAT-Quilichao, se han alcanzado hasta 40 kg/ha de nitrógeno atmosférico fijado. Sin embargo, muchos cultivares come r ciales de Phaseolus vulgaris son débiles en fijar nitrógeno. En sentido muy estricto, también habría que considerar no sólo el suelo , los fertilizantes y el aire, sino 1 os nutrí mentes presentes en 1 a semilla. E 1 cuadro 9 presenta in formaci ón al respecto, basada en datos de Feitosa et al (7) para l a variedad Carioca y en datos del CIAT* para las variedades Ca lima y Pijao. Cuadro 9. Variación en la composición del grano de frijol. Para l os casos de P, K, M g y mi cronutrimentos , la relación \"requerimiento nutricional\", \"cantidad de nutrimentos en el suelo\" y \"decisión de fertilizar\", se puede resumir así: Otro concepto muy importante rel ac i onado con el prob l ema de la fertilización es el concepto de \"exportación\" , también conoc ido con el nombre de \"rem oci ón\" ; indi ca, l a cantidad de nutrimentos que se retiran del suelo con la cosec ha, por ejemplo : a.Los granos (semillas ) , en el caso de la cosechas ituación común a nivel de productores comerciales.b.Las vainas (va lvas y granos=semillas) en el caso de agricultores que en forma manual, van cosecha ndo los f rutos que van al canzando la madurez .c. El tall o, las ramas y las vainas, en el caso del f rijol cosechado por pequeños produ ctores y donde el proceso final del secam iento se efectúa muy ce rca o dentro de las casas .El cuadro 10 presenta información sobre nutrimentos expor tados por vari as cosec has. Los nutrimentos exportados dan origen a un criterio de fertilización: \"El criterio de la restitución o devo lución al sue l o de los nu trimentos que han salido de él, para mantener su fe rtilidad en el nivel origina l\".3. La eficiencia de los fertilizantes en función del suelo :Pocos datos se conoce n al respecto, pero en general: a . Los fertilizantes nitrogenados tienen una efi ci encia del 50%. Graham (13 ) indica que un resume n muy genera l de los experimentos sobre fertilizaci ón nitrog enada en frijo l, muestra que no existe rea lmente mucha diferencia entre el sulfato de amonio, el ni t rato de amonio y la úrea, como fuentes de nitróge no . Seña la además, que en estudi os efectuados en Bras il, al aplicar todo el fertilizante ni trogenado antes de la siembra, solamente el 26% de este ferti li zante fue usado por l a planta . 25) , indica que la eficiencia de utilización de los fertilizantes nitrogenados puede calcularse como l a recuperac i ón aparente del fertilizante en experimentos de campo. Conociendo 1 a extracción de nitrógeno agregado, el porcentaje de recuperación se ca l cul a as1:N absorbido con la dósis aplicada -N absorbido sin agregar N Porcentaje de recuperación = ------------------- ,-::::;: . ._. La capacidad de fijación es mayor cuanto mayor es el contenido de óxidos de aluminio y hierro y cuanto mayor sea el contenido de aluminio intercambiable. Por ejemplo los suelos Andepts, debido a su alto contenido de óxidos de aluminio tienen alta capacidad de fijación de fósforo.En el caso del potasio, la eficiencia de los fertilizantes potásicos, se estima en promedio en un 50%.Anteriormente se había mencionado que para los casos de fósforo, potasio, calcio*, magnesio y micronutrimentos, se llegaba a una decisión positiva para fertilizar si: Hay necesidad ahora de calcul ar l a canti dad real (C) de fertilizante teniendo en cuenta: a) el porcentaje de nutrimento que tiene l a fuente de fertilizante escogida; b) la eficiencia del fert i lizante en función del suelo.l.Requerimiento nutricional, frijol variedad Gual i: 16 kg de P/ ha .2. Cant idad de P en el suelo: 7 kg de P/ ha. entonces , la decisión para fertili zar es positiva y el valor C, será:C. = 16 kg P/ha -7 kg de P/ha = 9 kg de P/ha */ El calcio en ・ ウ エ セ @ caso se está cons i derando desde el punto de vista nutrimental. Por lo tanto la corrección de la ac idez del suelo co n base en el \"encalado\" no está considerada en esta discusión . ","tokenCount":"3657"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1459693337.json b/data/part_2/1459693337.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..03478f467c540f650ff866ba4a3403d7f4342395 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1459693337.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"24847667bce8bc2f1d4f4e79048fc5f7","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/f66d06ee-69a4-43bb-8ef3-921de23bcabf/content","id":"-1323352642"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"2c9d816a-089b-4349-8f09-d6c038de596f","pagecount":"3","content":"Puma 1075 y puma 1076, híbridos de maíz de temporal para los valles altos de México (2200 a 2600 msnm)Los dos híbridos son de ciclo vegetativo intermedio de 150 d, y conformados por tres líneas; una de ellas es la línea IATolsol que participa como progenitor masculino común, con un nivel S4 de endogamia y que procede del híbrido comercial de maíz H-33, para los Valles Altos, y que es de la raza Cónico. La genealogía de esta línea es IA33F2-28-4-2-2.En el híbrido Puma 1075, la cruza simple progenitora hembra es CML246 X CML242 y para el híbrido Puma 1076 es la cruza CML244XCML349, ambas cruzas generadas en el Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo (CIMMYT). Las líneas que integran a la primera cruza simple fueron liberadas con endogamia S7 y S8, respectivamente. Puma 1075 presenta cubrimiento de espiga por la hoja bandera en 50 % de plantas en antesis; en cambio, en Puma 1076 la espiga está libre. En Puma 1075 la espiga es de forma semiabierta por el ángulo formado entre el eje principal y las ramas secundarias en el tercio inferior de la espiga, con ramas laterales; en Puma 1076 es abierta, con pocas ramas laterales y sin ramas secundarias. Pueden cosecharse con maquinaria porque su uniformidad aceptable lo permite. También exhiben tolerancia al acame con respecto al híbrido comercial H-33 y menor incidencia de las enfermedades virales Rayado Fino (Fine Stripe Virus, MRFV) y Achaparramiento (Corn Stunt Disease, CSD, Raza Mesa Central), que en los últimos años han ido en aumento en los Valles Altos. Los dos híbridos presentan pocos hijos con respecto al mismo testigo, el híbrido H-33.En pruebas de calidad nixtamalera presentan buen rendimiento de nixtamal. El color del grano de Puma 1075 es blanco, con características favorables para la fabricación de harina. En cambio, Puma 1076 presenta grano de color blanco cremoso, por lo cual no es adecuado para fabricar harina, de acuerdo con los estándares de la empresa MA-SECA ® .El rendimiento promedio del híbrido Puma 1075 en los años 1996 a 1999 fue 8700 kg ha -1 , valor que supera en 27 % al H-33, y el de Puma 1076 fue de 9000 kg ha -1 , 29 % más que H-33. El rendimiento potencial experimental de ambos es de 12 000 kg ha -1 , en el Valle de México, Cuautitlán, Méx., Valle de Puebla, Tlaxcoapan y Apan, Hgo., y en Tlaxcala. Prosperan en condiciones de buen temporal o secano, en humedad residual y en punta de riego; su adaptación puede extenderse a los estados de México, Puebla, Tlaxcala, Hidalgo y Michoacán, en sitios de 2100 a 2600 msnm. Estos híbridos fueron liberados hace 5 y 4 años, de modo que la multiplicación de semilla de sus progenitores la realizó la ex Productora Nacional de Semillas y el Departamento de Ciencias Agrícolas de la UNAM, donde actualmente se cuenta con semilla de los híbridos y sus progenitores para los productores y empresas semilleras interesados.La producción de semilla puede hacerse en el Valle de México, Valle de Puebla, Valle de Toluca y Temascalcingo, Méx. La relación de surcos de progenitor hembra con respecto a surcos de progenitor macho puede ser 6:2 u 8:2; es preferible usar 6:2 para asegurar una óptima fecundación. Las dos cruzas simples poseen buena capacidad de rendimiento y calidad física de semilla comercial, cuya productividad es de 4.5 a 5.0 t ha -1 , con 70 % de semilla de tamaño grande y mediana de forma plana, lo que da redituabilidad en la producción de semilla de ambos híbridos.El uso de estos híbridos podría ayudar a elevar el escaso empleo de semilla certificada (6 %), ya que compiten con los materiales de empresas semilleras. En los dos híbridos se cuenta con información para incrementar con facilidad la semilla, que puede consultarse con los obtentores. .","tokenCount":"641"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1465171682.json b/data/part_2/1465171682.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6e78f5c202b4d8219aba0aa18d26d725ff09857c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1465171682.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"755f0519de71a6f0606ad0285e5f95b3","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/c8ea1740-27e2-41ef-8d8c-95856fe842e5/retrieve","id":"-154180467"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"d6b566b5-4eaa-475c-9569-c84e8d7c5ff6","pagecount":"15","content":"Fair dealing and other rights are in no way affected by the above. The parts used must not misrepresent the meaning of the publication. ILRI would appreciate being sent a copy of any materials in which text, photos etc. have been used.Editing, design and layout-1 The SAPLING InitiativeThe CGIAR Sustainable Animal Productivity for Livelihoods, Nutrition and Gender Inclusion (SAPLING) is an initiative that focuses on sustainable animal productivity. This initiative aims to contribute to transforming livestock sectors in target countries to make them more productive, resilient, equitable and sustainable (see Box 1 on how this objective will be achieved).The initiative is based in seven countries located in East Africa (Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda), West Africa (Mali), Southeast Asia (Vietnam) and South Asia (Nepal), and works on 15 livestock value chains in total (see Figure 1).Within CGIAR, SAPLING is mapped to the action area Resilient Agrifood Systems.Figure 1. SAPLING focal livestock value chains, which number 15 in total, across seven countries (Ethiopia, Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Mali, Nepal and Vietnam) and six livestock types (beef cattle, chicken, dairy buffalo, dairy cattle, pigs and small ruminants).Technologies and practices for sustainable livestock productivity: developing, adapting and testing new and existing productivity-and resilience-enhancing, low-emission, scalable technologies and practices across the three main pillars of livestock productivity: improved feeds, animal health products and genetics (Work Package 1).Innovations and practices for safe consumption of livestock-derived foods as part of diverse diets: co-creating innovative models and approaches for social and behaviour change communication (SBCC), and testing and evaluating approaches for incentivizing market actors to enhance the supply of safe, nutritious and affordable livestock-derived foods (Work Package 2).Sustainable livestock productivity for gender equity and social inclusion: understanding constraints and opportunities, identifying best-bet entry points, addressing constraints and developing tools to measure progress (Work Package 3).Competitive and inclusive livestock value chains: generating evidence on institutional arrangements and technical interventions to transition towards more profitable, inclusive and sustainable livestock value chains (Work Package 4).Evidence, decisions and scaling: generating and consolidating evidence, models and tools to support public and private decision-making for a sustainable and inclusive livestock sector (Work Package 5).From: https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/1281502 Dairy buffalo value chain in NepalDairy is an important sector in Nepal considering its livelihood impact, poverty reduction potential, employment prospective and contribution to the national GDP. Almost all farming households possess livestock species which play a key role in household subsistence and nutrition. Livestock provides employment for 130,000 people. The contribution of the livestock sector to agricultural GDP currently stands at 25.7%, and to national GDP is 11.5% (Poudel et al. 2020).Women generally take care of the dairy animals, and spend a substantial amount of time feeding and managing them.Apart from the animal rearers, the other main actors in the dairy sector comprise milk collection centres, processors, input suppliers and retail outlets.There are about 5.31 million buffaloes in Nepal. Out of the milk producers who keep buffaloes, about 33% have crossbreeds (NDDB 2020). Buffalo remains the most important species for milk production in Nepal.Conventionally, these animals are kept under subsistence farming systems. Adhikari et al. (2017) reports that the majority of farmers in Nepal prefer the buffalo enterprise over cattle due to their multiple uses, lower risk and hardy nature against stresses. Low productivity of dairy animals, especially buffalo, compared to neighbouring countries is the number one limiting factor in the development and expansion of Nepal's dairy sector (CASA 2020). The production of native buffalo breeds is only about 900 litres/ lactation compared to the Murrah and their crossbreeds (1500 litres/lactation), which is still far behind the potential productivity of 2300 litres (NARC 2022).Out of the total milk produced, almost 65% currently comes from 1.5 million dairy buffaloes (CASA 2020). The recent livestock census (MoALD 2020) indicates that the buffalo population is increasing by 1.28% per year. Although the present cross bred population of buffaloes is more (26%) compared to cattle (13%), the cross bred population is not increasing as fast as that of cattle. Therefore, there is ample scope for improving the productivity of buffaloes in Nepal.In addition, buffalo rearing has implications on poverty reduction as many of the outputs of buffalo production systems among smallholder farmers in rural areas lead to household food security (Rasali 2015). Unfortunately, little effort has been made in the past to improve buffalo productivity compared to cattle (Rasali 2017;Devkota 2017). Farmers also have less incentives to invest in technologies due to lack of access to credit, inputs and output services. Thus, most of them have stuck to traditional husbandry practices.Due to the rapid increase in the demand for dairy products, there is great scope for improvement in the dairy sector in Nepal. 2020), it has to be reduced through forage-based feeding systems. So far, no fodder crops have been included in the cropping pattern; this limits the availability of feed, thus resulting in costly products.There are limitations which require policy attention. The Dairy Development Policy (2007) is the most relevant policy relating to development in the dairy sector. While the government controls milk prices, there is no control on the cost of inputs. The cost of treatment is also high. In addition, there is lack of sufficient knowledge and skills on modern dairy husbandry. On the processing side, there is a shortage of manpower (NDDB 2020). Many dairy processing units still use old technologies to process milk and milk products. Though product diversification can improve profitability, the possibility is limited due to low quality of raw milk, lack of qualified technical staff for product development and lack of market assessment.Sites selected by stakeholders to implement the SAPLING project in Nepal comprise six districts in the lowlands (terai), namely Sunsari, Saptari, Siraha, Dhanusha, Mahottari and Sarlahi, plus two districts in the mid hills (Kaski and Parbat).All these were considered as potential buffalo belts. The ratio of terai and hilly districts was fixed at 6:2, considering the population density of indigenous (Parkote, Lime) and crossbred (Murrah) buffaloes.Key value chain research questions 1. How can recent advances in phenomics, genomics, digital and reproductive technologies be capitalized on to achieve sustainable and scalable models for livestock genetic improvement, and delivery that ensure women and men livestock keepers equitably access and benefit from improved genetics?2. How to make optimum use of agricultural byproducts, mainly crop residues, using innovative climate smart technologies already in use in other sectors (e.g. biofuel production).3. How to develop and apply improved forages and food-feed crops that respond to year-round feed demands, increase productivity, improve natural resource use efficiency, and adapt to and mitigate climate change.4. How digital farmer support systems and disease control decision-making tools can address the herd health and reproductive challenges of buffaloes in Nepal.5. What type of institutional arrangements (including business models), for input delivery and output market linkages are profitable, inclusive and would lead to increased sustainable livestock productivity?6. What are the trade-offs between productivity, economics, gender & social equity, and environmental factors that need to be considered when developing and scaling up livestock innovations at national level for policy making?The key partners include: the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development (MoALD), Nepal Agricultural Research Council (NARC), Agriculture and Forestry University (AFU), dairy cooperatives, local governments, provincial governments (Madhesh, Kosi, Gandaki), Shreenagar Agro, Nimbus Feeds and the National Dairy Development Board.Since past research has shown that successful livestock development requires integrated packages of productivity enhancing technologies and innovations along the value chain and in the enabling environment, SAPLING organizes its outputs not as individual \"silver bullets\" but rather in innovation packages-\"combinations of interrelated innovations and enabling conditions that, together, can lead to transformation and impact at scale in a specific context 1 \"-that target specific sets of inter-related, context-specific opportunities and constraints.SAPLING chose to develop theories of change (ToCs) at the value chain (VC) level to demonstrate how the outputs of SAPLING's Work Packages come together in Innovation Packages to contribute to outcomes on the ground. ToCs were initially developed in participatory workshops with stakeholders and later updated to reflect changes in programming, to clarify and firm up the underlying logic-via specification of sub-pathwaysand to increase consistency across value chains. Click here for information on the stakeholder workshop that initiated the development of the ToC for dairy buffalo in Nepal. Going forward, regular review and updating is planned as part of program management and monitoring, evaluation, learning and impact assessment (MELIA). For more information on how the value chain ToCs fit into the overall SAPLING monitoring, evaluation and learning plan, refer to the SAPLING MEL Brief.Annex 1 provides additional information on the elements included in the ToC. to identify genetically superior bulls and cows and promote use of the bulls through Artificial Insemination and natural mating (4) establish digital farmer extension and feedback systems using herd performance, genomic data and data from relevant input service providers in order to improve herd management and profitability and (5) establish private-public partnerships for long-term sustainability of genetic gains.On the management of fertility in buffaloes, a multidisciplinary approach to reduce frequency and length of infertility in the animals will be implemented by integrating nutritional inputs, physiological therapies and clinical diagnoses. Overall, the quality of animal diet will be improved through the upgrade of rice straw, inclusion of nutrientdense forages and ensuring a balance of nutrients in the diet using a digital feed balancing tool. Rice straw with poor nutritional characteristics will be improved by breaking the cell wall using a fodder shredder machine so that its digestibility is improved. The quality will be further enhanced by fortifying the shredded straw with 10% molasse and 1% mineral mixture. The straw, thus processed and enriched with the support of industries will be bagged as mash or block and sold to farmers through cooperatives.As presented in Box 2, this IP includes not only technological innovations, but also capacity development and other enabling activities with gender integrated into all of them. Efforts to provide various enablers and building the capacity of different value chain actors and supporters will form an integral part of this innovation package. Village youth will be selected and trained as village livestock promoters (VLPs). They will in turn train farmers on various technologies and link them to input/service delivery agents such as AI inseminators, forage seed producers, straw processors, silage manufacturers, agrovets, feed dealers, banks, insurance agencies, etc. VLPs will also be trained on data recording using the AADGG mobile application, which will support genetic selection of bulls to use for AI. They will act as a link for convergence with government livestock programmes and make them available to farmers. These promoters will be anchored in the cooperative and will act as one-stop business solution providers for all livestock inputs and services.Practice and behaviour change will be facilitated through capacity building of the community VLPs. The support provided by VLPs will help individual farmers, especially women, as well as farmer collectives to improve their outreach and strengthen farm procurement, access working capital and improve market linkages.To ensure that all inputs and services are delivered in an integrated manner, various mechanisms have been put in place: (1) AADGG mobile application, where the same animals will be targeted for all the technologies through the 15-digit unique identification number generated by the authorized national partner, which is NLBO (2) The VLP is the common link through which all technologies, inputs and services to the same farmers will be channelled (3) The interventions will be implemented in the same area as the cooperatives, which are the entry points of the SAPLING initiative in rural areas. Therefore, the cooperative will also act as an integrator (4) Within the cooperative, the program will reach the same farmers selected by the coop as part of the Farmer Field School.Through this, all interventions will target the same animals in an integrated pathway.Business models will be created around delivery of inputs and services. The VLPs will be trained to work as independent self-sustaining service delivery agents. Towards this, they will receive specialized training on development of business plans and will be provided with mentorship support. To make the service financially viable, the VLPs will charge the farmers and/or their coops a fee for all products and services provided. Apart from VLPs, capacity building training will also be given to animal breeders, field veterinarians, technicians and extension agents. Besides, private individuals and small-scale industry representatives will be trained on production and supply of inputs (semen, processed enriched straw, silage) and services (AI) including extension.The IP1 will contribute to three Immediate Outcomes (IOs) in this sub-pathway, namely men and women farmers (IO1), men and women village livestock promoters and other service providers including veterinarians and extension workers (IO2) and animal breeders of the National Animal Breeding and Genetic Resource Centre (NABGRC) and the National Livestock Breeding Office (IO3) to improve awareness, knowledge, skills and overall technical and business capacities, and provide integrated inputs and services to farmers. All these immediate outcomes (IO1, IO2, IO3) are expected to contribute to the End-of-Initiative outcome of improved income of about 6000 buffalo farmers, 50% of whom are women, resulting in a 20%-30% increase in dairy productivity (EOI1).Key assumptions that underlie the logic of this subpathway are that (i) relevant departments invest in infrastructure, personnel and maintenance (ii) adoption of business models results in increased profits and further investments and (iii) adoption of integrated technology packages improves productivity.The second sub-pathway acknowledges the importance of policy in mainstreaming the success to benefit all farmers in the country through appropriate decisions, strategies and investment. The policy Innovation Package (IP2) involves mechanisms for policy maker engagement, enablers and capacity building (Box 3). The mechanisms and processes for effective engagement with policy makers include exposure visits, policy roundtable discussions, bilateral dialogue sessions and outreach workshops, etc. Stakeholder platforms will be formed for co-designing and scaling up of innovations. This will be at different levels, namely federal, provincial and municipal. Potential (public/ private) scaling agencies will be identified right from the beginning of research and will be involved at the design stage. They will be continuously engaged through different mechanisms (advisory committees, progress update meetings, site visits, outreach workshops). Through this, policy makers will have an opportunity to see the evidence for themselves and witness the change.The CGIAR Innovation Profiling and Scaling Readiness (IPSR) approach will be used to profile all the core innovations, package them with enablers and develop scaling strategies depending on the maturity of the innovation. Policy makers will also be involved in developing the scaling strategy. They will be provided with documented evidence of change, impact narratives, etc.The IP2 is expected to contribute to the Immediate Outcome (IO4) of increased awareness of public/private sector policy makers at federal, provincial and municipal levels on the need for increased investment in the buffalo sub-sector. All this will lead to change in their capacity in making informed decisions in terms of favourable policies, budgetary allocations and new investments (EOI2, EOI4).Components of the package comprise:Annex 1. Elements included in the theory of changeThe Theory of Change (ToC) includes three standard elements: outputs (Innovation packages), outcomes and assumptions. CGIAR defines an outcome as \"a change in knowledge, skills, attitudes and/or relationships, which manifests as a change in behaviour in particular actors, to which research outputs and related activities have contributed.\" In these ToCs, Immediate Outcomes (IOs) are initial changes in things like awareness and capacity that occur among next-users of the innovation packages. End-of Initiative outcomes (EOIs) are outcomes that occur further along the pathway and reflect changes in behaviour among target actors and, in some cases, the consequences of that behaviour such as an increase in productivity or the value of investments. EOIs are the same across all ToCs while the immediate outcomes that lead to them are context-specific. In order to seeToCs are living documents that should be developed and updated in response to concrete programmatic needs. This theory of change will be reviewed in collaboration with stakeholders on an annual basis, with changes made as necessary. The reflection process, changes to the ToC and reasoning behind these changes will be documented as annexes to this report. ","tokenCount":"2666"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1494191413.json b/data/part_2/1494191413.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..42cc7c1f8005b39464c870045089fd4d287da5bd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1494191413.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"07595db04a552287e3b50c7fc2c5304a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/5a22dfed-2c99-427c-b25c-a9b358784e34/retrieve","id":"-777059528"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"7fbacf49-8c33-4262-b178-4c4776929e80","pagecount":"28","content":"Maize streak virus is generally considered the most important and widespread disease of maize grown in sub-Saharan Africa. Occasionally reaching epidemic proportions, it is a chronic problem for small-scale farmers who lack the labor or equipment to ensure that their entire crop is planted early in the season. The later they plant, the greater the risk of virus damage.IITA's best-known accomplishment in maize improvement has been the development of a practical resistance screening system for large-scale field use against the streak virus. The system has been used to produce a wide rarlQe of resistant germ plasm fitting the various agroecologies of sub-Saharan Africa.The system enables th e identification of durable , oligogenic resistance. Since streak resistance carries no yield penalty or other undesirable side effects, and a practical screening technique exists, the effort now is to incorporate streak resistance into any variety before it is released in the region. To help achieve this goal, IITA has assisted national research programs to incorporate the screening method for streak resistance into their routine breeding practice. This booklet carries that assistance one step further. We hope the national programs in the region wil l use it profitably. We welcome their feedback on the usefulness of this publication.The success of any program breeding for resistance to diseases and/o r insects depends large ly on the development of suitable and reliable scree ning techn iques. Such techniques also have to be simple and relatively inexpensive. Field screening under natural infestations is often unsuccessful because the incidence of pests is erratic. To overcome this problem and to minimize the chance of 'escapes' in screening, it is necessary to infest a large number of plants artificially every season. For that purpose , rearing of the target insect is necessary.Mass rearing of Cicadulina leafhoppers was begun at the International Institute ofTropical Agriculture (IITA) , Ibadan, Nigeria, in 1976. Over the yea rs, a number of modifications and improvements have been made (Leuschner et al.l 980;Soto et al. 1982;Alam 1983;Dabrowski 1983).This handbook prese nts the techniques developed and experiences accumu lated at liT A over the past 15 yea rs for mass re aring and infestation of Cicadulina leafhoppe rs in screen ing for resistance to maize streak vi ru s (MSV).Maize streak virus (MSV) is one of the most economically damaging diseases of maize in sub-Saharan Africa. It is found on ly in Africa and surrounding islands, whe re it is widely distri buted and transmitted by leafhoppers in the genus Cicadulina. MSV is found in both forest and savanna zones and in varying altitudes (0-2000 m). Damage to maize from MSV can be insignificant in some years but epid emics of the disease in other years can devastate crops with yield losses of 100% (Fajemisin and Shoyinka 1976). The severity of the disease is usually re lated to the age of the plant at the time of infection , as well as to the relative suscepti bi lity of the varie ty. The you ng er the plant, the greater the severity of symptoms. At IITA, yield losses under artificially induced infestation of four varieti es with differing levels of resistance/susceptibility were found to range from 10 to 72%.Symptoms of MSV consist of broken to almost continuous , narrow, white ch lorotic stripes which develop ove r and along the vein on most of the leaf surface (Fig . 1). The density of striping depends on varietal susceptibility. Maize plants are vuln erable to MSV from emerge nce to tasseling . a Figure 1 Maize plant with streak virus symptoms 2 Susceptible plants infected at the seedling stage become stunted and may die or produce small and poorly filled ears (Fajemisin et al. 1976;Rossel and Thottappilly 1985).Twenty-two species of Cicadulina leafh oppers have been reported ; 18 of th ese occur in Africa (Webb 1987). Only eight species are known to be vectors of MSV (Table 1).The Cicadulina leafhoppers vary in length from 2.2 mm to 3.8 mm (Rose 1978). Coloration of the insects varie s but is generally pale to golden yellow. Some species have black markings on the forewings, pronotum, and venter. The dorsal side of the abdomen is usually brown. Most species have a pair of round, brown spots on the frontal margin of the forehead (Ruppel 1965). The fema le Cicadulina is distinguished from the male by its long ovipositor. Dabrowski 1987Okoth & Dabrowski 1987Dabrowski 1987a Th e identification of Cicadulina species is somewhat difficult. Species differ marked ly in mal e genital characters. The shape and size of the aedeagus and th e shape of th e pygophore processes are use ful characte rs for differentiating between species of Cicadulina (Ruppel 1965;van Rensburg 1983;Webb 1987). Figure 2 illustrates genital characters fo r two of the most common species of Cicadulina in Afri ca: C. mbila and C. storeyi (= C. triangula). Webb (1987) mentioned that care should be taken in distinguishing Arrican species of Cicadulina from a leafh oppe r of th e ge nus Afrosteles. Extern ally, both genera are similar. However, Afrosteles distans is slightly larger than Cicadulina and it lacks the dark apex of the ovipositor which is present in Cicaduliha. The distribution pattern s of Cicadulina leafh oppers also vary conside rabl y across Africa.C. mbila and C. storeyi (Fi g. 3) are wide ly distribu ted in Africa. C. mbila is th e most important vector species (Nielson 1968;Okoth and Dabrowski 1987). Both C. mbila and C. storeyi are presently bein g used fo r mass rea ring purposes in various African co untries. b \\ . \"., . .,Knowledge of an insect's life history is important for a successful mass rearing program . Cicadulina species differ in Iheir life history and ability to transmit MSV. The life histories of C. mbila and C. storeyi have been studied extensively (Table 2). Their developmental periods (egg to adult) (Fig. 4) To start a new colony of Cicadulina leafhoppers, collect the live leafhoppers from the field. The optimal time for collection of Cicadulina leafhoppers is at the end of the rainy season, when leafhopper population density is high and they migrate from old plants to young ones.Grass species of the genera Pennisetum, Digitaria, Eleusine, Brachiaria, Paspalum, Setaria, and Panicum are preferred by Cicadulina; so you should sample them for col lection (Rose 1978;Okoth and Dabrowski 1987) . In addition, you could sample irrigated wheat and grasses growing near rivers , lakes , or in valley bottoms.There are various ways by which you can collect Cicadulina leafhoppers from the field, but most suitable is a method that uses a cubical frame made of iron or steel rods, covered by a dark green or black cotton cloth-with transparent netting or fine mosquito net on one side (Fig. 5) (Dabrowski 1983). The iron frame and the cloth are handy and portable.To construct a frame, you require four 140-150 cm pieces of iron or steel rod 10. -15 mm in diameter. Sharpen the lower ends of the rods so that they can be easily pushed into the soil. Bend the top end of the rod into a short 20-25 cm arm to give corner support. At the sampling site, follow the following steps for collection of Cicadulina leafhoppers.1. Place the iron rods at the four corners of the sampling site in such a way that they will form a cage size 1.25 x 1.25 m. Do not disturb the site.Once the rods are fixed , place the dark cloth quickly over them so that the Cicadufina leafhoppers within the cage cannot escape .3. Enter the cage and disturb the grasses, so that insects within the cage will be attracted to the light on the side with transparent netting (Fig. 6). From there, selectively collect the Cicadulina leafhoppers, using a mouth aspirator.4. Cage the fema le leafhoppers singly with young millet or maize seed lings, using polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubes (about 8 cm in diameter and 25 to 30 cm long) (Fig. 7).Alternati ve ly release the Cicadulina leafhoppers co llected into a cage (approx. 40 x 40 x 60 cm) (Fig. 8) with young, potted, insect-free millet or maize plants and transport back to the laboratory or screenhouse. 3. When the nymphs become adults, collect samples of males separately from each cage for species identification , and keep the samples in 75% alcohol (ethanol). Before identification, place the specimens in 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution for 24 hours. Take out a specimen and place it under a dissecting microscope. Dissect the last abdominal segment to look for the male genitalia-the pygophore processes and aedeagus. See Figure 2 for an illustration of the genitalia of two common Cicadulina species. Follow Webb's (1987) key for identification of other species. 10 4. Once species identification is completed, put together adults belonging to the same species and release them into larger cages to build up the population (Fig. 9). Use only one species for mas& rearing.Select Cicadulina species with a high reproductive potential and high transmission ability of MSV for mass rearing and resistance screening. As explained, this would mean you use either C. mbila or C. storeyi for rearing. An added advantage is that ample information and experience exist on mass rearing these two species in various African countries.The standard procedure for mass rearing of Cicadulina leafhoppers at IITA is illustrated in Figure 10. The various steps involved are described next.The best host for egg laying by Cicadulina females is pearl millet, Pennisetum americanum (= typhoides). Up to 220 eggs per female have been obtained at IITA on this host (Dabrowski 1987b). Millet has the additional advantage over maize of tolerating large leafhopper populations without suffering severe damage. Use potted 14-day old plants for oviposition.For egg laying, keep adults on open oviposition tables (0.75 m high) (Fig. 11) or in metal framed cages (1.25 x 1.25Figure 11 Open table for egg-laying by leafhoppers on millet plantsNymphal rearing cageThe cage is covered with dark cloth prior to collection of leafhoppers 12x 1.50 m) covered with fine insect proof mesh (Fig. 12).Sew the mesh to form a cage that will fit over the metal frame; a zipper on one side of the mesh cage allows easy access to the plants and insects inside. Place cages over tables about 0.75 m high. Our experience at IITA is that adu lts kept on open tables do not escape from the screen house. This could be partly a result of adaptation to rearing conditions (i.e. , se lection for short-distance flyers), likely to occur in any large colony. We thus recommend using a combination of both methods (open tables and close cages) for oviposition until you obtain a large enough colony of leafhoppers adapted to open tables.After a one-week oviposition period , transfer the potted plants to nymphal rearing cages (1.25 x 1.25 x 1.50 m) for egg hatching and nymphal development (Fig. 12). Add fresh plants to the tables, so that females can continue layi ng eggs. Coll ect the adu lts and release them onto oviposition tables at least every 3-4 weeks. The duration of the oviposition period might vary , according to species and environmental conditions. Th erefore , carry out experiments to determine the most appropriate length of time for any given location. This period , however, shou ld not be very long , so as to avoid a corresponding ly long nymphal emergence period that will resu lt in a mixture of nymphs of different ages. Plant millet weekly to ensure avai labi lity of host plants for rearing.Once eggs hatch, nymphs wi ll start to feed on the millet plants. Add fresh plants to the cages regularly to ensure an adequate supp ly of food. Cut the older plants, on which nymphs have been feeding, with a sharp knife, and shake gently to dislodge the nymphs onto the fresh plants. Nymphs will take about 3 weeks to become adults.A nymphal rearing cage can hold 20-24 pots. However, it is advisable to reduce this number to 16 during the rainy season when high relative humidity prevai ls. This will ensure air flow and will help reduce problems of fungal growth on the millet plants.Em ergence of all the adults in a nymphal rearing cage shou ld ideally occur within one week. COllect the ad ults by covering the cage with a dark cotton cloth , leavin g a small portion of the cage uncovered (Fig. 13). Th e leafhoppers will respond to the light and move to the portion of the cage left uncovered. A person can then move into the cage and use a mouth aspirator or a modified vacuum cleaner (200-500 W) for collection . The rubber tube of th e vacuum cleaner is attached to a thick rubbe r tube (15 cm long x 6 cm diam) and the latter connected to a small plastic co ll ecting vial (9 cm long x 5 cm diam) (Fig. 14). The collecti ng vial shou ld have one end cove red by fine mesh ; the other end shou ld be a narrow tube that will be used to collect the insects (see inset in Fig. 14). After you have collected th em , transfer leafhoppers to vi ru s acquisition feeding cages or to oviposition tables , according to your rearing needs at th at time . Using Cicadulina in resistance screeningUse young potted MSV-infected maize plants of a streaksusceptible variety for virus acquisition feeding. Plant maize on a regular basis and infect it with MSV, 7-10 days before it is needed. Keep the plants in a cage the same size as the nymphal rearing cages. A period of 48 h is optimal for virus acquisition. After this period , col lect the viruliferous leafhoppers again, using the vacuum cleaner, and transfer to leafhopper dispensing vials (9 cm long x 5 cm diam) for transport to the field.The leafhopper dispensing vial is made of PVC , covered with fine mesh at one end and with a plastic lid at the other.The plastic lid of the dispensing vial is removable, to allow transfer of leafhoppers from the collecting \\i.ial into it. The lid has a small orifice (3 mm diam) to allow the leafhoppers to pass when they are dispensed. This orifice is covered with a small plug of cotton wool or grass, to prevent the leafhoppers from escaping during transport.If the field is far from your rearing facilities, collect the viruliferous leafhoppers from the virus acquisition cage and place them in a smaller cage (approx. 40 x 40 x 60 cm) with a few healthy potted maize or millet plants, so that they can be easily transported to the field. Prior to infesting the field, collect the leafhoppers from the cage with a mouth aspirator and transfer them to leafhopper dispensing vials.Alternatively, after collecting the leafhoppers from the virus acquisition cage, transfer them to the dispensing vials and transport these to the field in a cooler. At low temperatures (10 to 12°C) the leafhoppers wi ll sUNive for several hours. While humidity should be high to prevent dessication, water condensing in the vial will kill the insects. Therefore, cover the inner wall of the vial with absorbent paper (i .e., paper towel or filter paper) to collect the excess moisture resulting from condensation. If the field is close to your rearing facilities, you can take the leafhoppers directly to the field in the dispensing vials.To ease infestation, anesthetize leafhoppers with carbon dioxide (C0 2 ) immediately before you dispense them. Carry the CO 2 to the fie ld in a rubber inner tube , to which a thin rubber hose with a valve is attached (Fig. 15) (Leuschner et al. 1980). The CO 2 immob ilizes the leaihoppers, preVenting their escape. Next, dispense the insects into the leaf whorl at a rate of 3-4 leafhoppers per plant (Fig. 16). The leafhoppers wi ll become active shortly after release , and they wi ll start feeding on the plant.If necessary, use CO 2 a second time to inactivate the wakening leafhoppers in the vial. Excessive use of CO 2 , however, wi ll kill some insects and result in nonuniform MSV infestati ons. C02 can be bought from commercial establi shments, such as soft drink bottling companies , or it can be obtained from fire extinguishe rs. Ca rry out field infestations when plants are at the three-leaf stage (approx. 8-10 days after planting) (Fig. 16).Figure 15 Anesthetizing leafhoppers with carbon dioxi de (C0 2 ) in the field before infestation of maize seedlings. Notice the inner tube used to carry CO 2 to the fieldAnesthetized leafhoppers are shaken out of the vial onto a maize seedling (3-4 per plant) showing MSV symptoms three weeks after infestationViral symptoms will appear in 5-1 0 days and th ey will be cl early visible 2-3 weeks afte r infestati on (Fig. 17). The following visual rating scale of 0 to 5 (Tabl e 3) has been developed based on Soto et al. (1982) fo r evaluating resistance to maize stre ak virus (Fig . 18) .Selecti on for MSV resistance is done by first thinning out susceptible plants 3-4 weeks after planting. At fl owe rin g, se lect plants com bining adequate levels of resistance (1-3 on th e ratin g scale) with other desirable characters (Efron et al. 1989).Figure 18 Reaction to MSV (left to right). Susceptible ( 5), moderately resistant (3), and resistant (1). Ratings are based on the visual rating scale (Table 3)The host plants used for rearing shou ld be free from other insects , hence they should be grown inside a screen house to avoid pest infestation. Insects which might be problematic include whiteflies, aphids, leaf beetles, planthoppers, and lepidopterous la rvae . Manual removal of insects is often effective. If an infestation develops, it might be necessary to discard the plant batch or to spray a shortterm action insecticide , such as malathion. Spraying should be done outside the screenhouse, and the plants left for 1-2 weeks prior to their use for Cicadulina rearing. Large populations of aphids on millet seed lings have been effectively controlled in the past, using a coccinellid beetle, Chilomenes sulphureus (IITA 1987).Mass production of Cicadulina leafhoppers may be comp licated by:(a) presence of natural enemies inside the rearing cages;(b) temperature fluctuation during winter months or at high elevation.Like other insects, leafhoppers are attacked by predators and parasitoids . Ants, spiders, and lizards are common predators of Cicadulina nymphs and adults. In addition, there is a mirid bug , which is an egg predator. Ants can be kept off from the rearing cages by placing a water pan with water and kerosine or oil under the legs of the tables.The common parasitoids of Cicadulina leafhoppers are a hymenopterous wasp (Oryinid ae) and a dipteran fly (Pipunculidae). Sometimes, they can seriously affect mass production. Regular inspections by an entomologist should be carried out. Once it is noticed that a rearing cage has been infested wi th parasitoids or mirid bugs, it is advisable to discard the insects and , if necessary , also the plants and soil in the cages. The cages should be cleaned thoroughly and left empty for some days. If all the cages are severely infested, then it is advisable to discard the entire co lony and start with a new colony as described in Figure 9. Alternatively, 200-300 healthy males and females can be collected from the cages to start a new colony .In countries with severe winter, the temperature fluctuation during the winter months may affect the mass rearing of Cicadulina leafhoppers. Where the night temperature drops below 15\"C, special arrangements should be made to increase the temperature in the screen house . Low temperature will affect the leafhoppers as well as the germination and growth of the host plants. To augment the night temperature in the screen house during winter months, the sides of the screenhouse should be covered at night with clear plastiC sheeting. During daytime, the plastic sheeting should be rolled and tied up for cross ventilation. In addition, supplementary heating can be obtained from a kerosine burner or an electric heater (where electric power supply is available). The rearing cages can also be covered with plastic sheets at night.Cicadulina leafhoppers belong to two categories: active transmitters of MSV and nonactive transmitters (Storey 1932). This character is genetically controlled. When mass rearing Cicadulina leafhoppers, it is important to maintain a high percentage (60-80%)of active transmitters in the colony. This will reduce the number of insects required for infestation of each plant, ultimately resulting in more plants being infested using the same number of leafhoppers. But it will require periodical quality control.To test the proportion of active transmitters, about 50-100 female leafhoppers should be collected from a nymphal rearing cage and released for 48 h into a small cage with streak-infested maize plants. The females should then be caged singly with 5 to 7-day old potted maize plants susceptible to MSV, using PVC cages (Fig. 7). About 7-10 days later, the numberof plants showing streak symptoms should be observed and the percentage of transmission should be calculated . If the percentage of transmission is below 35 , a new colony of active transmitters should be initiated, by putting together the progeny of those females that transmitted MSV. Also , plants showing MSV symptoms from the transmission test shou ld be placed together in a cage for egg hatching and nymphal development. Within 3 weeks, the nymphs will develop into adults and the new colony of the leafhoppers should have a higher proportion of active transmitters. The new colony can be used to build up the population of active transmitters. The percentage of active transmitters in the colony should be checked twice a year.Trainees listen to liT A scientist (third from left) explaining mass rearing techniquesTo meet the needs and circumstances of national programs and private seed companies, modifications to the described techniques might be needed.Entomologists setting up Cicadufina rearing facilities should be able to adapt the techniques developed at IITA to fit their own conditions. IITA scientists are available to assist national programs in developing Cicadulina rearing facilities.The Togolese national program developed leafhopper rearing facilities with assistance from IITA and Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maiz y Trigo (CIMMYT) and modified the infestation method to their needs. The national program of Zaire and CIMMYT's mid-altitude station in Harare , Zimbabwe, were assisted by IITA to develop their rearing facilities. For the latter two countries, modifications were needed to ensure survival of the insect colonies during the cold winter months. IITA is also assisting the national programs of Ghana and Cameroon to develop their leafhopper rearing facilities. ","tokenCount":"3786"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1505642765.json b/data/part_2/1505642765.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..925ecd2c426c3c4259ecf444f5483b0db4405e21 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1505642765.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d26561780aaa29a4ed12784bb2a72c2d","source":"gardian_index","url":"http://awm-solutions.iwmi.org/Data/Sites/3/Documents/PDF/Country_Docs/West_Bengal/Situation%20Analysis%20Brief%20West%20Bengal.pdf","id":"1575788626"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"42c69e01-daff-46db-83e5-ee70fd895d13","pagecount":"4","content":"• Rocky uplands of Purulia and the western fringes of Bankura, Birbhum, Bardhaman and Medinipur districts.• Low-lying alluvial plains encompassed within Jalpaiguri,This situation analysis is based on secondary data, field observations, household interviews and interviews with key informants. It examines farming systems in West Bengal and the characteristics of existing agricultural water management (AWM) practices. It takes into account the natural, political and institutional environments that influence AWM and identifies the people and organizations that have a stake in smallholder AWM. The results of the situation analysis are summarized here. The AWM solutions identified in the analysis were shared at the State Consultation Workshop and priority solutions for further analyses were selected by participants. For more on this, please see the State Consultation Workshop Brief which is also available on the website.Nearly 70% of the population of West Bengal depend on agriculture, making AWM a critical factor in improvement to livelihoods. Improving AWM is made all the more imperative because some 37% of the State's population are below the poverty line, compared to a national average of 26%, and over 80% of the absolute poor live in rural areas.Three-quarters of the land area of the State is alluvial plain and is highly suitable for agriculture. Major tributaries of the Ganges River flow through the State with high rainfall of 1,200-3,000 mm per year. There is therefore distinct potential for improving AWM, agricultural production and livelihoods.A particular difficulty in using AWM to address agriculture and poverty issues is that water resources are unevenly distributed across the State; so for example the three zones that can be identified based on groundwater resources would need different AWM solutions. These zones are:• The Himalayan and Sub-Himalayan zones of Darjeeling and parts of the Jalpaiguri and Cooch Bihar districts in the north.The State government is committed to increasing the irrigation potential of surface water through the rehabilitation of existing minor irrigation schemes 1 and excavation of new water storage structures. Groundwater irrigation should only be expanded after an assessment of aquifers and should be socially balanced.The resources for the proposed government intervention in minor irrigation would come from central financial support, such as from the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) and the Command Area Development and Water Management Programme (CADWM). In the case of groundwater irrigation, there is no comprehensive scheme for sharing expenditures between the Central government and the States except for the loan-based Rural Infrastructure Development Fund (RIDF).The Water Investigation and Development Department (WIDD), Government of West Bengal has been the principal government agency implementing minor irrigation schemes in the State. Panchayats are also expected to be involved in all implementation aspects, from site selection to construction, after which open dug-wells, tube wells and river lift irrigation schemes are handed over to Panchayat Samities (village committees) to operate and maintain. Panchayat Samities are permitted to collect adequate water rates from beneficiaries to meet operation and maintenance costs in full. This has been highly successful.The West Bengal Ground Water Resources (Management, Control and Regulation) Act was passed in 2005, in response to the rise in groundwater extraction. This is implemented by the State Water Investigation Directorate (SWID), the District Level Authority (DLA), the Corporation Level Authority (CLA) and the State Level Authority (SLA). Under this Act, anyone intending to extract groundwater must obtain a permit.There has been no growth in agricultural production over the past few years, and the number of landless people and farmers with small parcels of land has greatly increasedcurrently, over 3.3 million hectares are divided into individual plots of 2 ha or less. This is a cause of concern as West Bengalhas not yet attained actual food security; it currently produces 50% less than its requirement for wheat and 75% less for pulses.There have also been changes in AWM with canal irrigation declining and groundwater irrigation dramatically increasing (Table 1). The Minor Irrigation Census (MIC) by the Government of India (GoI), which records irrigation schemes of less than 2,000 ha, identified over 800,000 structures in 2001 of which the majority (approximately 600,000) were shallow tube wells (STWs). The decline in dug-wells and surface irrigation is mainly due to lack of maintenance. The ownership pattern of shallow tube wells also suggests that most are privately owned by individuals or groups. Twenty villages were surveyed in four districts, and the State-wide trend of increasing groundwater use was seen in all but one village. In the villages of North 24 Parganas, farmers depend largely on diesel-operated STWs and electrically run STWs. In the villages of Hooghly, the farmers mainly depend on submersible pumps and deep tube wells (DTWs). Purulia District is the exception because most of the agricultural land is mono-cropped and there are very few irrigation facilities.The low adoption of electric pumps in West Bengal compared to the rest of India is a function of the availability of electricity connections, the cost of electricity and the metering structure imposed by the State government.Farmers with electricity meters complained that they pay around INR 30,000 per year compared to just INR 10,000 per year for unmetered submersible pumps. This cost is also transferred to farmers who buy water from pump owners and now pay INR 500-1,000 more per acre of boro paddy cultivation than before the introduction of metering.The metering charges are based on the time of day Diesel pumps are extremely popular but, due to the rising price of diesel, farmers are increasingly opting for Chinesemade pumps instead of conventional Kirloskar-type pumps produced in India. The Chinese pumps cost less to run as they require less fuel and can even be run on kerosene, which is cheaper than diesel, or a mixture of kerosene and diesel. They are also much lighter, which means that the pumps can be carried to the field and brought home at awm-solutions.iwmi.org Source: Narayanamoorty, 2007 Groundwater irrigation in Hooghly District night. As a result, the pumps are less vulnerable to theft, and farmers can transport them between different water sources, including tanks and canals. The primary disadvantage of the Chinese-made pumps is that they heat up quickly and wear more easily than other pumps, but this does not appear to diminish their growing popularity.In Uttar Dinajpur, treadle pumps are used by farmers in a few villages. These manually operated pumps are made out of bamboo and cost as little as INR 200. The amount of water extracted is similar to that extracted by hand pumps, which means that they can be used on crops with low water requirements and small vegetable patches, but they cannot replace STWs, which are essential for crops like boro paddy that require large amounts of irrigation water and in places where the groundwater table has fallen below 30 feet. An advantage of treadle pumps is that they have no direct financial operating costs, although they require labor.In Purulia District the poor capacity for retention of rainwater leads to severe runoff and soil loss. The nongovernmental organization, Professional Assistance for Development Action (PRADAN), is trying to address this by introducing water harvesting structures (WHS) and the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) with funds from the Swaran Jayanti Rojgar Yojna (SJRY) and MGNREGA. These WHS are generally constructed on private lands, particularly of marginal and small-scale farmers from the scheduled castes and scheduled tribe communities. These WHS are rectangular or square and generally require 5% of the land area of the farm. Slightly larger ones are also constructed and are locally known as Hapa. They are best located at the lower level of the land, where natural water seepage can be used to the maximum. Those located on higher land tend to dry up faster. As a result of the introduction of WHS, many of the barren lands that remained fallow are being cultivated. According to the farmers interviewed, the main benefit of this system is that they no longer have to migrate in search of work, or gather food from the forest.The cost of irrigation depends on a number of factors especially the water source, the water extracting equipment, the means of powering the equipment, and whether the equipment is owned or leased. Farmers find innovative ways to reduce costs, such as using Chinese-made pumps, mixing kerosene with diesel, or using submersible pumps to fill tanks at night when electricity tariffs are lower and using this water to irrigate during the day.Comparisons of various different irrigation options and estimated costs are given in Stay informed. Join the mailing list to receive briefs and other project outputs by writing to us at AWMSolutions@cgiar.org. Find out more on the AgWater Solutions website http://awm-solutions.iwmi.org This briefing note is based on a report by Partha Sarathi Banerjee. The report is internal but if you would like an electronic copy please contact the Project Secretariat, awmsolutions@cgiar.org awm-solutions.iwmi.org crops such as mango. This may have implications for food security.In all cases, the cost of production has gone up due to the (electricity) tariff and diesel costs, and for some, these additional costs mean they can no longer afford to use their pumps or to rent pumps.Since the situation analysis was conducted a number of case studies have been undertaken on specific AWM solutions. These will be published as briefs on the project website as soon as they are completed, and stakeholder consultations will be continued to share findings and receive comments. The introduction of groundwater irrigation with tube wells had a positive impact on farmers and their families as water from these wells allowed them to grow surplus crops for the market. However, over the years the cost of irrigation has increased, while that of food grains has remained relatively constant. This is threatening to reverse the positive trends in agriculture and livelihoods.For users of electrical pumps, the metering system and the introduction of a three tariff structure based on the time of day have given the farmers cause for complaint because they usually have to operate their pumps when the tariffs are highest and there are frequent power cuts. This is altering farming patterns and could potentially result in a return to a single annual crop.The rising cost of diesel is also affecting production. Many farmers who use diesel pumps are opting not to grow the lucrative boro paddy but instead to grow less water-intensive ","tokenCount":"1709"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1517740761.json b/data/part_2/1517740761.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..000eb1bbb21c6b8d392ef1c31c29ae30ae8b6820 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1517740761.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"308ade355e5d0b704fd6c6f6799939bf","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/8e12d638-62f3-40d9-a0a7-57582d6efafd/retrieve","id":"2040968760"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"74c5ae68-a334-4539-85e3-5ef3054efc74","pagecount":"29","content":"Cuadro 4-1. Parcela de semillas necesaria para sembrar 100 hectáreas. Cultivo Area Yuca 12.5 a Arroz 2.5 b Soya 4.0 b Frijol 6.7 b Maíz 0.7 b a. Terreno ocupado durante un año. b. Terreno ocupado durante un semestre.Debido a su sistema de propagación vegetativa, que permite formar clones, la yuca es una especie en la cual todas las plantas de una misma variedad deberían ser iguales, tanto en su aspecto exterior como en la producción de raíces y follajes.Sin embargo, los factores ambientales bióticos (plagas y enfermedades) y abióticos (clima y suelo) pueden modificar considerablemente las plantas individuales, afectando aspectos tales como altura, vigor, floración, ramificación, producción de raíces, contenido de almidón y de HCN, entre otros. Uno de los aspectos más importantes que el ambiente puede afectar es la calidad del material de siembra, llegando a causar su degradación hasta el punto de hacer desaparecer una variedad dada. Enfermedades de tipo sistémico, como las causadas por algunos virus, bacterias y micoplasmas; baja fertilidad, desbalance de los nutrientes y aun niveles moderados de salinidad en los suelos, son algunos de los factores que, además de reducir el rendimiento de las plantas directamente afectadas, reducen la capacidad del material de siembra obtenido de ellas para expresar el potencial de rendimiento de los genotipos.El efecto de tales factores negativos durante varios ciclos de propagación vegetativa puede producir una disminución acumulativa en la calidad del material de siembra, ocasionando su degeneración paulatina (Lozano et al., 1984).Por otra parte, la utilización de estacas de buena calidad, como parte de un conjunto de prácticas de cultivo, permitiría la obtención de plantaciones sanas, vigorosas y con producciones cercanas al potencial de rendimiento de los genotipos.La oportuna disponibilidad de material de siembra de buena calidad constituye un factor decisivo para la diseminación y utilización de nuevas variedades de yuca. La falta de semillas mejoradas ocurre aun en cultivos de propagación sexual sencilla, pero naturalmente se acentúa en la yuca por la biología de la especie, la situación socioeconómica del agricultor que la produce y la falta de sistemas organizados de abastecimiento de semillas (estacas).La yuca es uno de los pocos cultivos cuyo material de siembra por sí solo no tiene ningún valor. En los cultivos de granos (maíz, frijol, etc.) y aun, en cultivos de propagación vegetativa como papa, ñame, caña de azúcar, entre otros, el material de siembra que no se utiliza como semilla, de todas maneras tiene valor como alimento. Semillas como las de cultivos hortícolas, que tampoco tienen otra utilidad, por lo menos poseen la ventaja de ocupar muy poco espacio y de poderse conservar por períodos prolongados bajo buenas condiciones de almacenamiento. La yuca, en cambio, se siembra CAPÍTULO 4 Semilla Vegetativa de Yuca Javier López* para aprovechar sus raíces, y los tallos que no se utilizan como semilla no poseen otra cualidad que les de valor.Adicionalmente, la yuca posee algunas características que dificultan la producción de semilla en mediana o grande escala.El material de siembra de yuca se deteriora durante el almacenamiento debido a la deshidratación de los tallos, pérdida de reservas por brotación y ataque de plagas y patógenos, lo cual ocasiona una disminución paulatina de la cantidad de estacas aprovechables, a medida que aumenta el período de almacenamiento.A pesar de los esfuerzos realizados por los investigadores, no se dispone hasta el momento de una tecnología que solucione estos problemas, pero se sabe que el potencial de almacenamiento es una característica varietal que permite, con algunos cultivares como el MCOL 1468, hacer almacenamientos tan prolongados como de 6 meses, mientras que otros como el MCOL 1684 se deterioran en menos de un mes.El hábito de crecimiento está relacionado con dicha diferencia varietal, ya que clones no ramificados o de ramificación tardía permiten mejor almacenamiento que los de ramificación temprana. Adicionalmente, hay indicios de que el estado nutricional de las plantas madres también afecta el potencial de almacenamiento de los tallos.En promedio, una planta madura de yuca en buenas condiciones sólo produce alrededor de 10 estacas comerciales de 20 cm, cifra que puede reducirse a 5 estacas o incluso menos, dependiendo de las condiciones de cultivo. Esto significa que de 1 ha sólo se podrían obtener en un año estacas suficientes para sembrar 10 ha nuevas, lo cual representa una tasa de multiplicación bastante baja si se compara con algunos cultivos de granos (Figura 4-1).Esta situación trae las siguientes consecuencias:1. Es muy difícil expandir rápidamente el área sembrada.2. Los gastos incurridos en 1 ha de cultivo deben dividirse entre un bajo número de estacas.3. El productor de semillas debe dedicar una gran cantidad de terreno a la obtención de material de siembra (Cuadro 4-1).El manipuleo y transporte de estacas de yuca son operaciones dispendiosas y costosas, debido a lo elevado de su peso y volumen. Una sola estaca de yuca tiene un peso equivalente al de 230 semillas de maíz; el material de siembra para 1 ha (10,000 estacas) pesa alrededor de 0.7 t y ocupa un volumen aproximado de 2 m 3 . Esta es una de las razones por las cuales muchos agricultores tienden a usar estacas Figura 4-1. Tasa de multiplicación de algunos cultivos.• Desea cambiar de variedad.• Desea aumentar considerablemente el tamaño de su plantación.El volumen de ventas de un productor de semilla de yuca está en función de las variaciones en el área sembrada que, a su vez, depende del comportamiento en el precio de las raíces.Para que la semilla sea un componente tecnológico altamente productivo, requiere poseer calidad. La experiencia ha demostrado que una semilla de buena calidad permite obtener buenos resultados en el campo, mientras que una semilla de mala calidad conduce a resultados pocos satisfactorios y fracasos.La calidad es un conjunto de cualidades genéticas, fisiológicas y sanitarias que dan a las estacas su capacidad para dar origen a plantas productivas. La presencia en niveles altos de estos tres componentes esenciales de la calidad, permite que la semilla se encuentre en su máxima calidad integral. Por otro lado, la debilidad de cualquiera de sus componentes introduce el factor limitante. Es así como genotipos perfectos no podrían expresar su verdadero potencial si la semilla está fisiológicamente deteriorada y muestra mala germinación.Los atributos cualitativos de una variedad, generada por los trabajos de mejoramiento genético, solamente serán transferidos al agricultor en el caso de que no haya deterioro de sus características de generación en generación en el proceso de multiplicación de semillas.Esta calidad se produce en la etapa de mejoramiento genético. Los trabajos de cruzamientos, selecciones y pruebas regionales están orientados a escoger aquellos materiales que contienen un programa genético apropiado para las condiciones encontradas en las diferentes zonas agroecológicas. Cuando los materiales seleccionados se cristalizan en variedades aceptables para los usuarios, se La mayor parte de la producción de yuca la realizan pequeños agricultores, utilizando sistemas tradicionales de producción y obteniendo rendimientos bajos, aunque estables. Las áreas yuqueras se caracterizan por tener poca infraestructura y sus suelos son generalmente pobres, llegando a considerarse, en algunos casos, como marginales para la producción agrícola.Esta pobre fertilidad del suelo conduce a la obtención tanto de una reducida producción de raíces como de un material de siembra de mala calidad, debido, principalmente, a su bajo contenido de reservas nutricionales. Estos cultivadores usan prácticas agronómicas que demandan el uso intensivo de mano de obra y tienen muy pocos recursos para trabajar.Los agricultores yuqueros habitualmente producen su propio material de siembra, ya que por ser un cultivo de propagación vegetativa, su siembra, generalmente, coincide con la cosecha del cultivo anterior.El agricultor que compra semilla de yuca se encuentra en una de estas circunstancias:• Siembra por primera vez.• Dejó de sembrar por un tiempo largo, durante el cual no pudo conservar su material de siembra.procede a recomendar su utilización masiva y comercial.Para ser útil a la comunidad agrícola serán necesarias cantidades masivas de estacas de dicha variedad, y es en el proceso de multiplicación cuando aparece la necesidad de mantener la identidad genética.La calidad genética se puede asegurar sembrando semillas auténticas, es decir, que el material de siembra se tome de cultivos certificados por entidades como el ICA, donde no haya mezclas varietales, y manteniendo esa autenticidad con metodologías preventivas (por ejemplo, evitando la siembra en terrenos que inmediatamente antes hayan sido sembrados con otra variedad de yuca) e inspecciones para eliminar plantas fuera de tipo.Los factores genéticos que más afectan la producción de semilla de una variedad de yuca son su vigor general y el hábito de ramificación. Mientras que el vigor incide en el crecimiento total de la parte aérea de la planta y, por lo tanto, en la cantidad de ramas de las cuales se pueden obtener estacas, el hábito de ramificación influye sobre la disponibilidad de tallos primario y secundario, que son las partes más usadas para material de siembra.En términos generales, las variedades vigorosas producen más estacas que las no vigorosas, pero la mayor diferencia radica en el tipo de ramificación, ya que en variedades con ramificación tardía, la proporción de tallos primario y secundario es mayor que en genotipos con ramificación temprana, obteniéndose, por lo tanto, un mayor número de semillas y de mayor peso promedio.El resultado tangible de la calidad fisiológica está en la facultad de la estaca de brotar y dar origen a una planta vigorosa. En la calidad fisiológica se incluyen los siguientes aspectos:El contenido nutricional de las estacas es fundamental para la iniciación de la nueva planta, ya que durante los 20 días siguientes a la siembra su crecimiento se realiza exclusivamente a expensas de las reservas Cuando esos tallos se utilizaron como material de siembra, se encontró que el porcentaje de germinación de las estacas era fuertemente influido por el nivel de K, así como por el equilibrio del K con el N y el P. Es importante resaltar que el hecho de sembrar las estacas obtenidas de un suelo, con o sin aplicación de fertilizantes, no incidió en su capacidad de germinación, ya que lo importante para este proceso fue la cantidad de reservas nutricionales que tuvo la estaca.Utilizando estacas con un alto contenido nutricional fue posible obtener plantas en una mayor producción de tallos aptos para usar como material de siembra; esto es muy importante para programas de producción de semilla, debido a la baja tasa de multiplicación que tiene la yuca (Cuadro 4-4).Adicionalmente, una fertilización de la parcela de semillas con énfasis en K, permitió que las estacas obtenidas produjeran, a su vez, una mayor cantidad de follaje, lo cual es un factor de especial interés en la realización de una agricultura sostenible en regiones de ladera, ya que al aumentar la cobertura del suelo, disminuye la erosión hídrica.Finalmente, el uso de estacas con un adecuado contenido nutricional permitió obtener aumentos en la producción total de raíces frescas, debido, principalmente, a un mayor tamaño de las raíces y, en menor grado, a un mayor número de raíces producidas (Cuadro 4-5).En la Figura 4-2 se aprecian dos plantas de la misma variedad (MCOL 1684) y de la misma edad (12 meses). La planta del lado izquierdo se originó de una estaca con bajo contenido nutricional (N 0 P 0 K 0 ), mientras que la del lado derecho se originó en una estaca con alto contenido nutricional (N 2 P 2 K 2 ). Ambas estacas fueron sembradas en un terreno ácido y poco fértil sin fertilización. Esto significa que la diferencia entre estas dos plantas se debe exclusivamente a la cantidad de reservas nutricionales que tenían las estacas.Por lo tanto, la utilización de estacas de buena calidad nutricional que permitan mostrar el verdadero potencial de rendimiento de las variedades es un componente tecnológico de bajo costo que permitiría a los agricultores aumentar la producción de yuca, con una adecuada conservación del suelo.Lo expuesto anteriormente tiene gran importancia en programas de producción de semilla, particularmente los dirigidos hacia regiones de suelos ácidos e infértiles clasificados, principalmente, como Oxisoles y Ultisoles, y que en países como Colombia, Venezuela, Brasil y Bolivia son áreas yuqueras actuales o potenciales.Una estaca de yuca normalmente produce de uno a cuatro brotes que forman los tallos primarios. La aparición de flores produce la ramificación de estos tallos primarios, con la consecuente formación de los tallos secundarios, terciarios y así sucesivamente, de acuerdo con el ciclo de floración y ramificación de la variedad.Por consiguiente, los tallos primarios de la planta representan el tejido de mayor edad, mientras que los tallos secundarios, terciarios y de formación más reciente representan el tejido más joven.El aumento en la edad del tejido trae como consecuencia un aumento en el grosor y estado de lignificación del xilema, junto con una reducción proporcional del tejido medular. Cuando este proceso ha avanzado lo suficiente, los tallos se consideran maduros y aptos para servir como semilla, ya que su grosor y lignificación les suministran suficientes reservas nutricionales y resistencia a la deshidratación.En realidad, cualquier sección de la planta, desde la parte basal hasta el meristema apical, permite la obtención de una nueva planta, pero en el ámbito comercial es conveniente descartar la parte herbácea que, por su bajo contenido de materia seca, tiene una alta probabilidad de deshidratarse en el campo después de la siembra; se utiliza el resto de la planta como materia de siembra.Sin embargo, parece que existe relación directa entre la edad de la semilla y el comportamiento de la nueva planta. La mayoría de los investigadores opinan que con estacas tomadas de los tallos primarios o parte basal se obtienen plantas con rendimientos más altos que los obtenidos con estacas de parte apical.Esta diferencia en los rendimientos podría atribuirse a diferencia en reservas nutritivas de las estacas, ya que la composición química de las mismas (N, P, K, Ca y Mg) varía entre diferentes secciones a lo largo del tallo. El aumento en rendimiento, a medida que aumenta la edad de las estacas, podría deberse entonces a una mayor concentración de elementos nutritivos, principalmente, N y K, y a un mayor contenido de materia seca, como se observa en el Cuadro 4-6 (Enyi, 1970). Así, la mayor cantidad total de N, P, K, almidón y fibra se acumula en la porción más vieja de los tallos.La viabilidad de las estacas está directamente relacionada con su contenido de humedad. En una planta de 10-12 meses, los tallos tienen alrededor de 70% de humedad, y las estacas que ellos produzcan tendrán viabilidad cercana a 100%. Una vez cortadas, se inicia la deshidratación de las estacas, que se acelera cuando son almacenadas en un lugar con alta temperatura y baja humedad relativa, y su efecto es tan severo que una disminución de 20% en el contenido de humedad puede ocasionar una reducción de 50% en la brotación de las semillas (Cuadro 4-7).Un indicativo visual para estimar el contenido de humedad y, por ende, la viabilidad de las estacas, es la velocidad con la que el látex característico de las plantas euforbiáceas fluye de una estaca recién cortada. Si fluye inmediatamente significa que tiene suficiente humedad y, por lo tanto, un buen poder de germinación. A medida que una estaca se deshidrata, se hace más lenta la aparición del látex y es menor su cantidad.En la producción del material de siembra se pueden presentar problemas sanitarios inducidos por patógenos (hongos, bacterias, micoplasmas y virus), y por plagas (insectos y ácaros), los cuales reducen la cantidad de estacas que puede producir cada planta, pero Cuadro 4-7.Influencia de la pérdida de humedad en la viabilidad de las estacas de yuca. también reducen la calidad del material de propagación, lo cual se refleja en bajos rendimientos. También representan un riesgo en las áreas donde se introduzca el material afectado (Lozano et al., 1986).La yuca puede ser atacada por varios agentes patógenos que se transmiten por medio del material de siembra y que están en capacidad de disminuir los rendimientos del cultivo por varias causas:• Disminución en la brotación de las estacas.• Muerte de las estacas después de la brotación.• Reducción en el vigor normal de las plantas.• Reducción en el número de raíces engrosadas.• Permanencia de inóculo potencial para siembras futuras.Dichos patógenos pueden ser sistémicos o localizados.Son aquellos capaces de invadir toda la planta. Generalmente no producen síntomas en los tejidos lignificados y maduros, lo cual dificulta la identificación del material enfermo una vez cortado. Casi siempre los síntomas se desarrollan en el sistema foliar o ramas jóvenes, poco lignificadas, o aun en el sistema radical (Lozano y Jayasinghe, 1982).Estas plantas constituyen la fuente del inóculo primario en una nueva plantación. Entre los patógenos sistémicos diseminados por el material de siembra están:Hongos. El patógeno fungoso sistémico más importante de la yuca es Diplodia manihotis, el cual produce estriados necróticos marrones a lo largo del sistema vascular afectado. Otros menos importantes son Fusarium solani y F. oxysporum. El hongo Sphaceloma manihoticola, causante del superalargamiento, aunque no es propiamente sistémico, produce una gran cantidad de esporas en chancros epidermales sobre los tejidos maduros del tallo, de un tamaño tan diminuto que hace inidentificable el patógeno, y el gran número de ellos lo hace parecer sistémico (Lozano y Jayasinghe, 1982).Bacterias. La enfermedad bacterial más importante y una de las más graves del cultivo es el añublo bacterial, causado por Xanthomonas axonopodis p.v. manihotis, el cual puede producir pérdidas económicas de más de 50%. Cuando las estacas de yuca están infectadas del añublo bacterial, pueden ocurrir pérdidas de germinación superiores a 25%. Este patógeno se restringe a los tejidos del xilema de los tallos inmaduros del hospedero, debido a que la bacteria es incapaz de degradar los tejidos lignificados del tallo; por lo tanto, es muy difícil detectar la presencia de esta bacteria en tallos lignificados que son los usados normalmente para la siembra, cuando ya han sido cortados para semilla. Además, la severidad de la enfermedad se reduce considerablemente durante los períodos secos del año; por lo tanto, en esta época, la selección visual de material de propagación sana procedente de una plantación infectada es a veces imposible. Considerando su capacidad diseminante (debido al efecto de la lluvia, insectos, herramientas y suelo infestado), la dispersión del patógeno puede ocurrir en períodos relativamente cortos a partir de unas pocas plantas enfermas (Lozano, 1982).Micoplasmas. El superbrotamiento, enfermedad causada por un micoplasma, se ha encontrado en Brasil, Venezuela, México y en la región amazónica de Perú. Aunque su incidencia no es de consideración, se ha encontrado que las plantas afectadas producen hasta 80% menos que las sanas (Lozano, 1982).Virus. Los virus pueden producir en las plantas síntomas foliares, como son el mosaico africano, el mosaico común americano, el mosaico de las nervaduras y el mosaico caribeño, o síntomas radicales, como el cuero de sapo. También hay virosis que no muestran síntomas visibles aparentes en algunos cultivares (portadores), limitándose a reducir paulatina y levemente su vigor normal y producción.Aunque se pueden producir plantas sanas, es conveniente probar su sanidad, mediante técnicas de laboratorio como serología, microscopía electrónica, hibridación de ácidos nucleicos, entre otras (Lozano y Jayasinghe, 1982).Son aquellos cuya capacidad invasora no es sistémica, o sea, que sólo invaden zonas o partes limitadas del tallo. Su presencia se caracteriza por la formación de chancros, agallas y áreas necróticas.Pertenecen a este tipo Erwinia carotovora pv carotovora (pudrición bacterial del tallo), que ocasiona degradación de la médula, la cual presenta una coloración amarillenta, rojiza o marrón oscuro; Agrobacterium tumefaciens (agalla bacterial del tallo), que produce agallas en los nudos del tallo; Colletotrichum spp. (antracnosis) y Phoma spp. (mancha de anillos circulares), que causan llagas epidermales y corticales (Lozano y Jayasinghe, 1982). Los patógenos localizados penetran en el tallo a través de las heridas causadas por medios mecánicos o por insectos, directamente por los estomas o por invasión de los pecíolos. La invasión por estos patógenos generalmente decrece a medida que el tallo se lignifica.Se puede usar como material de siembra toda porción del tallo que esté sana y, por consiguiente, al seleccionar las estacas se deben eliminar las porciones del tallo afectadas por estos agentes patógenos (CIAT, 1987b).Como norma general, el material de propagación de yuca debe colectarse de plantaciones aparentemente libres de patógenos sistémicos. Esta aparente sanidad es necesario verificarla mediante inspecciones a los cultivos en épocas con condiciones climáticas favorables al desarrollo de las enfermedades; por ejemplo, desde la mitad hasta el final de la estación lluviosa, los síntomas de superalargamiento, añublo bacterial y mosaicos causados por virus son más notorios que durante la sequía. Antes de hacerse la colección respectiva deben identificarse las plantas más vigorosas y sanas de las plantaciones (Lozano y Jayasinghe, 1982).Entre los daños que los insectos pueden ocasionar al cultivo de la yuca están la reducción en la germinación y el establecimiento de las plantas mediante el ataque al material de siembra. La diseminación de huevos de insectos y ácaros es más probable que la de larvas y adultos, ya que éstos vienen sobre la epidermis del tallo, lo cual hace que sean relativamente fáciles de detectar. Sin embargo, los barrenadores del tallo, los insectos escamas y los huevos de ácaros pueden diseminarse fácilmente vía material de propagación (Lozano, 1982).El riesgo de diseminar ácaros a otras regiones es mayor cuando ha ocurrido un brote severo en un área y se transporta semilla de dicha área a otra zona; es así como posiblemente se introdujo el ácaro Mononychellus tanajoa en Africa. Las escamas y el piojo blanco o harinoso también se diseminan de este modo. Según el grado de infestación, estos insectos pueden reducir la germinación de las estacas en 70%. Los huevos y las larvas de otros insectos, tales como los trips, también pueden encontrarse en las yemas del tallo y en las ramas, y se diseminan al transportar estacas afectadas (CIAT, 1987b).Acaros. Es, probablemente, la plaga más grave que tiene la yuca. Frecuentemente, atacan el cultivo durante la estación seca y causan daños severos en la mayoría de las regiones productoras del mundo. Las principales especies son M. tanajoa (ácaro verde), Tetranychus urticae (ácaro rojo) y Oligonychus peruvianus. Las infestaciones de ácaros en el CIAT incluyen estas tres especies y, experimentalmente, se ha detectado un pérdida en rendimiento de 20% a 53%, dependiendo de la duración del ataque (Bellotti, 1982).Escamas. Se han identificado varias especies de escamas que atacan el tallo de yuca en muchas regiones productoras del mundo, siendo las más importantes la escama blanca Aonidomitilus albus y la escama negra Saissetia miranda.Aonidomytilus albus se encuentra presente en, prácticamente, todas las regiones yuqueras del mundo. Este insecto, que pudo haber sido diseminado de un continente a otro en el material de propagación, se ha convertido en la plaga de yuca más ampliamente distribuida.El daño más grave, resultante del ataque de estos insectos, parece ser la pérdida de material de propagación, debido a la muerte de las yemas. Los estudios efectuados en el CIAT con estacas altamente infectadas con A. albus dieron como resultado una pérdida en la germinación de 50%-60% (Bellotti y Schoonhoven, 1978).Trips. Atacan las plantas en los puntos de crecimiento, siendo la especie más importante Frankliniella williamsi. La reducción promedio en el rendimiento para ocho variedades susceptibles en Colombia fue de 17.27% (Bellotti y Schoonhoven, 1978) y la reducción en la producción de material de siembra puede llegar a 57% (Lozano et al., 1986).Mosca de la fruta. Se han identificado dos especies de mosca de la fruta, Anastrepha pickeli y A. manihoti, las cuales atacan la yuca en América. Las larvas de esta mosca hacen túneles en los tallos de la planta de yuca, formando galerías de color marrón en el área de la médula. Un patógeno bacteriano (Erwinia carotovora pv. carotovora), frecuentemente encontrado en asociación con las larvas de la mosca de la fruta, puede causar pudriciones severas del tejido del tallo.Esta pudrición secundaria puede ocasionar disminución del rendimiento y pérdida de material de siembra, ya que la germinación de las estacas obtenidas de este material puede reducirse hasta en 16% y el rendimiento de plantas provenientes de estacas dañadas llega a ser 17% más bajo que el de plantas provenientes de material sano (Bellotti y Schoonhoven, 1978).En el material de siembra se han encontrado barrenadores del tallo, principalmente estados larvales de Coleoptera como Coleostermes spp. y Lagochirus spp. y de Lepidoptera como Chilomina sp., que, generalmente, causan daños esporádicos o localizados. La infestación puede ocurrir en las plantas en crecimiento, pero también durante el almacenamiento de los tallos, por lo cual el material de siembra se debe inspeccionar cuidadosamente antes de su utilización (Bellotti, 1982).Comejenes. Los comejenes atacan la yuca, principalmente en las tierras bajas del trópico.Se ha reportado como plaga en diversas regiones del mundo, pero principalmente en Africa. En Colombia, Coptotermes niger se alimenta de material de siembra, de raíces o de plantas en crecimiento que presentan partes en proceso de secamiento o de muerte, debido a condiciones climáticas desfavorables, patógenos o mala calidad de la semilla.En estudios efectuados en el CIAT, los comejenes destruyeron casi 50% del material de propagación almacenado, y las pérdidas en germinación oscilaron entre 25% y 30% (Bellotti y Schoonhoven, 1978). En la Costa Norte colombiana se ha observado que los comejenes pueden atacar tallos almacenados, causando gran pérdida de material de siembra, pero también disminuye la germinación y el establecimiento de las estacas cuando éstas se siembran llevando el insecto en su interior. Estacas libres de comején también pueden ser atacadas por este insecto cuando después de la siembra viene un período seco.El objetivo principal de un lote de multiplicación es obtener el mayor número posible de estacas por planta, evitando aquellos factores o circunstancias que, además de reducir el rendimiento de raíces de las plantas directamente afectadas, también reducen la capacidad del material de siembra obtenido de ellas para expresar el potencial de rendimiento de los genotipos.El manejo agronómico de los lotes de multiplicación implica el empleo de todas las prácticas de cultivo que se recomiendan para la obtención de alto rendimiento de raíces, realizándolas con los mínimos costos. Esto permite que con la venta de las raíces se obtengan ingresos suficientes para cubrir el costo de la producción, tanto de las raíces como de las estacas; generalmente, queda un margen de utilidad que es muy importante para los productores de semilla comercial y aún para el productor de semilla básica.Para alcanzar estos objetivos, los lotes de multiplicación de semillas deberían incluir las siguientes recomendaciones:Es deseable que el terreno para producción de semilla esté aislado de cultivos comerciales de yuca, con el fin de evitar riesgos de contaminación con insectos y, principalmente, con patógenos.No es recomendable utilizar terrenos donde se haya sembrado yuca durante 3 años consecutivos o más, ya que a largo plazo, con la siembra continua, se hace notoria la disminución de su capacidad para producir tanto material de siembra como raíces, independientemente del nivel de fertilidad del suelo. Esto se debe, probablemente, al incremento de patógenos del suelo y a la disminución de algunos microorganismos benéficos como las micorrizas. En estos terrenos lo conveniente es proceder, primero, a reducir el potencial de inóculo de patógenos presentes en el suelo, mediante la siembra de cultivos como sorgo y maíz, cuyos patógenos no son generalmente patógenos de la yuca, interrumpiendo el cultivo continuo de la yuca, al menos por un período de 2 años, o sembrar estas gramíneas durante 1 ó 2 años después de talar los cultivos forestales.A pesar de que tradicionalmente se ha considerado como normal un suelo con una conductividad eléctrica menor de 4 dS/m y una saturación con sodio menor de 15%, el comportamiento de la yuca se afecta con niveles mucho menores. Howeler (1981) señala como niveles críticos para este cultivo una conductividad de 0.7 dS/m y una saturación con sodio de 2.5%.Se estudió el comportamiento del material de siembra obtenido en parcelas con moderados niveles de salinidad, sembrando el cv. HCM-1 en dos tipos de suelo: uno, con conductividad de 0.5 dS/m y saturación de 1.3%, y otro, cuya conductividad era de 0.8 dS/m y saturación con sodio de 3.0%. Las plantas sembradas en las parcelas con mayor nivel de sodio no sólo presentaron un menor crecimiento, reduciéndose así la cantidad de estacas producidas (Cuadro 4-8), sino que cuando se utilizaron como fuente de semilla para una nueva siembra, dieron origen a plantas con una producción inferior, tanto de estacas como de raíces (Cuadro 4-9).Otras características deseables en terrenos que se destinen a la producción de semilla, son:1. Que sean propios: Cuando el terreno es alquilado y al cumplirse el contrato éste no se prorroga, se corre el riesgo de tener que arrancar la yuca anticipadamente, lo cual ocasiona pérdida de material de siembra en una cantidad proporcional al tiempo que permanezca almacenado.2. Que estén distantes del pueblo y la carretera, para evitar el robo de yuca por parte de vecinos y transeúntes, con la consiguiente pérdida de la semilla.3. Que estén bien cercados, para evitar daño por ganado, especialmente vacuno y porcino. La parcela de semillas se debe ubicar, preferiblemente, en un suelo de buena fertilidad natural. En caso contrario, se debe realizar una fertilización completa, ya que el nivel de fertilidad del suelo influye decisivamente tanto en la cantidad como en la calidad de la semilla producida.En suelos pobres, la producción de material de siembra es baja, pero se pueden obtener aumentos, tanto en el número como en el peso de las estacas mediante la aplicación de fertilizantes (Cuadro 4-10).Adicionalmente, en el estudio sobre la nutrición de la semilla, ya mencionado, se encontró que en comparación con la semilla de bajo contenido nutricional, la semilla de alto contenido nutricional sembrada en un suelo sin fertilizar permitió obtener 53% más de tallos aptos para usar como material de siembra, pero cuando ésta se sembró en un suelo fertilizado se obtuvo un 100% adicional de tallos (Cuadro 4-11).La tasa de multiplicación de la yuca se podría aumentar notablemente aumentando la densidad de siembra en las parcelas de semilla. Según Villamayor (1983), cuando se aumenta el número de plantas por hectárea, por encima de la población utilizada normalmente en cultivos comerciales, cada planta tiende a mantener estable su número de tallos primarios, lo cual permite obtener una mayor producción de estacas, aunque de un peso ligeramente menor; la razón es que los tallos crecen más delgados, a pesar de lo cual el rendimiento de los cultivos sembrados con estas estacas no se afecta.Sin embargo, con un aumento en la densidad de siembra, el tamaño promedio de las raíces se reduce. En las condiciones del Valle del Cauca, la máxima producción de raíces comerciales (con tamaño aceptado corrientemente en el mercado) se logra con 5000 plantas por hectárea en las variedades de porte alto ramificado y con 10,000 plantas por hectárea en las de porte bajo erecto y alto erecto (CIAT, 1975).La reducción en el rendimiento de raíces, ocasionada por la competencia de las malezas, es un hecho bien conocido tanto en yuca como en otros cultivos. Pero también es claro que un deficiente control de malezas también afecta en proporción similar la producción de estacas.En un ensayo, realizando diferentes niveles de control de malezas durante los 2 primeros meses de crecimiento (CIAT, 1983), se observó que de acuerdo con la eficiencia en el control de malezas, hubo diferentes niveles de competencia entre malezas y yuca, reflejada ésta por una reducción en el peso de la parte aérea de las plantas cuando disminuyó el porcentaje de control. El número de estacas producidas por planta fue proporcional al peso de la parte aérea.El hecho de no controlar las malezas redujo el crecimiento de la parte aérea a un nivel muy bajo y en estas condiciones, solamente una de cada tres plantas produjo una estaca de aceptable tamaño y calidad. Por otra parte, sin competencia de malezas se obtuvieron casi seis estacas por planta (Cuadro 4-12). Es, por lo tanto, de doble interés mantener un buen nivel de control de malezas cuando se desea optimizar, tanto la producción de estacas como de raíces.En relación con los costos directos, el control de malezas representa un rubro bastante alto, que varía considerablemente (entre 20% y 50%), dependiendo de la clase de malezas presentes, sus tamaños al momento de la siembra, densidad de siembra, calidad de la semilla y distribución de las lluvias durante los primeros meses de cultivo, entre otros factores.En condiciones normales, la aplicación de un herbicida preemergente, complementado con una o dos desyerbas manuales o aplicaciones de herbicidas posemergentes, debería ser suficiente para mantener el cultivo libre de malezas durante todo su período vegetativo.La mano de obra necesaria para aplicar con fumigadora de espalda el herbicida preemergente, se reduce a un jornal por hectárea si en una siembra realizada a 1 m x 1 m, y utilizando una boquilla de abanico TK5, se abarcan 2 m de ancho por pasada y se usa un volumen de 150 lt/ha. En las desyerbas manuales, el número de jornales depende de la clase de malezas, la altura de ellas y la herramienta utilizada (machete, pala, azadón), pero se puede presupuestar un promedio de 15 jornales por hectárea en cada desyerba. Es importante destacar que ninguno de los herbicidas recomendados para yuca, preemergentes o posemergentes (incluyendo el glifosato), causan daño alguno a las estacas sembradas horizontal o verticalmente, aun aplicados 8 días después de la siembra.La práctica de intercalar otras especies en un cultivo de yuca reduce, generalmente, la producción, tanto de las raíces como de la parte aérea, en proporción directa a la competencia ejercida por las otras plantas; además, reduce el peso promedio de las estacas.En el CIAT, en 1989 se realizó un experimento a nivel de finca con cinco agricultores, ubicados en diferentes zonas, durante 2 años. Con el fin de evaluar la influencia del intercultivo con maíz en la calidad del material de siembra de yuca, se tomaron, tanto de monocultivo como de intercultivo, estacas que en la siguiente temporada se sembraron en monocultivo. Se encontró que ni la altura de las plantas, ni la producción de ramas o de raíces se afectó por el origen del material de siembra (Cuadro 4-13).Esto demuestra que la calidad del material de siembra obtenido, tanto de yuca plantada en cultivo individual como en asocio con maíz, no es significativamente diferente. A pesar de que el intercultivo conduce a una reducción en la cantidad de estacas producidas, este sistema de cultivo corrientemente utilizado en muchas regiones del mundo podría ser también empleado en la producción comercial de semilla de yuca; así, en pequeñas empresas artesanales se podría obtener semilla tanto de yuca como de variedades de maíz. La yuca tiene reputación de ser un cultivo rústico, resistente a la sequía. En efecto, cuando comienza la estación seca, la planta disminuye la producción de nuevas hojas, mientas pierde continuamente las viejas. Si el período seco se acentúa, caen más hojas disminuyendo el área foliar a un nivel mínimo y llega a reducir su crecimiento, entrando prácticamente en un período de latencia.Cuando empiezan las lluvias, la planta utiliza sus reservas de carbohidratos para producir hojas nuevamente y así reiniciar su crecimiento (Cock, 1989).Sin embargo, a pesar de que la yuca no tiene períodos críticos en los que la ausencia de lluvias pueda ocasionar la pérdida total de la cosecha -a menos que la sequía sea tan prolongada que las plantas mueran-un período seco como el que ocurre normalmente en el occidente de Colombia, en la mitad del año, puede, en algunas variedades, reducir drásticamente la producción tanto de raíces como de material de siembra. Por ejemplo, un período seco de 10 semanas, empezando 12 semanas después de la siembra, cuando comienza el almacenamiento de almidón en las raíces, ocasionó en la variedad MCOL 22 una reducción de cerca de 30% en la producción de raíces, y de 50% en la producción de ramas y hojas (Figuras 4-3 y 4-4).Por lo tanto, aunque la yuca por tradición se ha cultivado dependiendo exclusivamente del agua lluvia, su pleno potencial de rendimiento sólo puede ser alcanzado si se incluye el manejo de agua entre las prácticas culturales. Se ha encontrado que si se suministra riego durante los períodos secos, a razón de 20 mm por semana, se aumenta el rendimiento de las raíces en cerca de 60% (Mohankumar et al., 1984).La cantidad de semilla que se puede producir a determinada edad está en función de un conjunto de factores determinantes, como son: el genotipo, las condiciones climáticas (con temperaturas altas, el crecimiento es más rápido), fertilidad del suelo, control de malezas y sistema del cultivo (la competencia ejercida por un cultivo intercalado retarda el crecimiento de la parte aérea).Pero independientemente de estas circunstancias, el número de estacas aprovechables por planta es muy bajo y va aumentando a medida que se lignifican los tejidos. En condiciones del CIAT, en Palmira, el número de estacas por planta en algunas variedades aumenta gradualmente, inclusive después de los 12 meses, mientras que en otras variedades después de esa edad comienza a Figura 4-3. Efecto de un período seco en la producción de ramas y hojas de yuca cv. MCOL 22. • Es conveniente que las ramas para almacenar se corten de la mayor longitud posible, pues a medida que avanza el período de almacenamiento, se hace inevitable eliminar una porción cada vez mayor de los extremos que se van secando, en especial, del apical, reduciendo así la parte central aprovechable. Mientras más corta sea la rama almacenada, esta parte central representará un porcentaje más bajo de la rama entera.• El almacenamiento de las ramas en posición vertical es preferible que en posición horizontal, ya que ocasiona una menor pérdida de material de siembra y una menor reducción en el peso de las estacas aprovechables (Cuadro 4-15).• El tratamiento químico con una solución insecticida-fungicida es una medida preventiva, que bajo condiciones desfavorables de almacenamiento puede ayudar a evitar el deterioro de la semilla (Cuadro 4-16).• En algunas variedades, la edad de la planta en el momento de hacer el almacenamiento afecta la proporción de material de siembra aprovechable (Cuadro 4-17). Si se espera hasta que la parcela de semillas complete 12 meses para su cosecha, se obtendría:• Semilla fresca al momento de la nueva siembra.• Máxima producción de estacas.• Máxima producción de raíces.Dado que lo más conveniente es maximizar los ingresos por concepto de la venta de las raíces, para poder fijar un precio razonable a las estacas, el productor de semilla debe decidir cuál es la época más adecuada para realizar la cosecha, ya que con las variedades precoces o con las tardías que se cosechan tempranamente, para aprovechar un alto precio de las raíces, se tiende a obtener un bajo número de estacas por planta.Si se decide realizar la cosecha antes de 12 meses, el número de estacas posibles de obtener disminuye mientras más jóvenes sean las plantas; por un lado, porque los tallos están inmaduros y, por otro, porque es necesario almacenarlos por más tiempo.Los problemas que se presentan durante el almacenamiento son deshidratación, pérdida de reservas por brotación y ataque de plagas y patógenos, los cuales ocasionan disminución paulatina del material de siembra, a medida que aumenta el período de almacenamiento. En la actualidad no se dispone de una tecnología que solucione estos problemas, pero sí se conocen algunos principios que ayudan a reducir sus efectos negativos: Figura 4-5. Variedad de ramificación tardía, con tallos primarios largos que facilitan el almacenamiento.Figura 4-6. Almacenamiento de tallos de yuca.• Las ramas se deben llevar al lugar de almacenamiento tan pronto como se coseche la yuca, ya que la exposición al sol en el campo reduce la capacidad de la semilla para ser almacenada (Cuadro 4-18).El almacenamiento de los tallos se facilita cuando se utilizan variedades de ramificación tardía. Tallos primarios largos (alrededor de 1 m) son fáciles de manejar, tienen buen rendimiento al cortar las estacas, facilitan el uso de sierras accionadas por motor y soportan mejor el tiempo de almacenamiento (Figura 4-5).En la Figura 4-6 se ilustra un almacenamiento vertical en un lugar semisombreado. Los tallos se apoyan en un soporte colocado en forma horizontal, a 60 cm sobre el suelo.Antes del almacenamiento, el suelo debe removerse ligeramente y humedecerse, para que cada tallo haga buen contacto con el suelo. Si en la región proliferan insectos de la madera (comejenes, termitas, etc.), se debe espolvorear un insecticida sobre el suelo.Alrededor de un mes después de iniciado el almacenamiento, comienzan a brotar las yemas apicales en todos los tallos, reiniciándose así el proceso de crecimiento del follaje. En el almacenamiento que se ve a la izquierda en la Figura 4-6, recién se está iniciando el proceso de brotación, mientras que las ramas de la derecha, con un mayor tiempo de almacenamiento, ya presentan un follaje denso.Cuando ocurre una temporada seca prolongada, este follaje se seca mostrando apariencia de quemado, por lo cual es necesario un riego cada semana. Si por el contrario hay una temporada de lluvia, se crea un microclima cálido y de alta humedad relativa, el cual favorece el desarrollo de enfermedades, por lo cual es conveniente aplicar fungicidas de amplio espectro.Cuando se da por terminado el almacenamiento y se procede a fraccionar el tallo, se debe descartar el extremo apical rebrotado. Es importante que los tallos queden en posición vertical porque así rebrotan únicamente 2 ó 3 yemas apicales. Cuando los tallos quedan inclinados hay tendencia a que broten todas las yemas, perdiéndose así toda la rama.Un ambiente adecuado para el almacenamiento de las ramas es el que proporciona la plantación misma, especialmente cuando se trata de variedades de ramificación tardía, ya que, además de las ventajas mencionadas anteriormente, este tipo de plantas permite que los operarios transiten dentro del cultivo sin enredarse en las ramas.Para este efecto, se deja sin cosechar una parte del cultivo, y las ramas que se van a almacenar se llevan a su interior, disponiéndolas en forma vertical como se indicó anteriormente.En este caso, el soporte para los tallos pueden ser ramas de yuca que se amarran de las plantas que están en pie (Figuras 4-7 y 4-8).Si el cultivo está sobre caballones se facilitan eventuales riegos para los tallos almacenados.Debido a su largo ciclo de crecimiento, la yuca está sujeta continuamente a presiones de factores bióticos (plagas y enfermedades) y abióticos (clima, suelo), factores que pueden disminuir la calidad del material de siembra.Las variedades tradicionales han estado bajo estas presiones bióticas y abióticas durante considerables períodos de tiempo y su efecto puede ser un decrecimiento acumulativo de la calidad del material de siembra después de muchos ciclos de propagación vegetativa (Lozano et al., 1984).El efecto de la mala calidad de la semilla sobre la producción es imprevisible, pero a veces reduce los rendimientos en mucho más de 50% (Lozano, 1987).Por lo tanto, se recomienda hacer una selección positiva de las plantas que van a suministrar el material de siembra para las parcelas de semillas. De acuerdo con CIAT, (1987a), los rendimientos, especialmente de las variedades tradicionales, se pueden aumentar con la sola utilización de material de siembra tomado de plantas vigorosas y, aparentemente, Figura 4-7. Almacenamiento de tallos dentro de la plantación.Figura 4-8. Detalle de la manera como se deben apoyar los tallos.Una planta madura tiene mayor número de nudos que una planta joven; adicionalmente, en las plantas maduras la parte basal tiene entrenudos más cortos que la parte apical.Teóricamente, para obtener una nueva planta sólo sería necesario sembrar un trozo de tallo del tamaño apenas suficiente para que contenga un nudo. Sin embargo, son muy escasas las posibilidades para que una estaca tan corta germine y enraíce bajo condiciones de campo, ya que para evitar la deshidratación sería necesario mantener constantemente una buena humedad del suelo durante las primeras semanas después de la siembra.En el caso contrario, estacas largas, de 60 cm o más, tienen altas posibilidades de enraizamiento y germinación, pero debido a su gran volumen presentan dificultades de manejo y transporte; además, de cada planta madre se obtendría un menor número de estacas.La influencia que tiene la longitud de las estacas en el rendimiento ha sido tema de investigación en varios países y los resultados muestran tendencias a rendimientos ligeramente mayores con estacas largas; la razón, probablemente, es que el mayor contenido nutricional permite un mejor crecimiento inicial de las plantas, lo cual incide en una mejor tuberización de las raíces.La mayoría de investigadores opinan que estacas de 20 cm y al menos cinco nudos tienen suficientes reservas nutritivas y un adecuado número de yemas para asegurar un buen establecimiento y rendimiento del cultivo.Se ha encontrado que estacas con menos de cinco nudos tienen menos raíces gruesas por planta y un menor peso promedio que las Sin embargo, plantas aparentemente sanas pueden estar infectadas con virus latentes (que no muestran síntomas visibles) o por hongos endofitos dañinos (Lozano y Laberry, 1993). También pueden haber sufrido afecciones tan recientes que en el momento no muestran síntomas.Por esta razón, cuando además del aspecto exterior, las plantas que servirán como fuente de estacas se seleccionan por una alta producción de raíces, se asume el principio simple de que las plantas con más alto rendimiento deben ser las más sanas (Lozano, 1987).El uso de este tipo de selección ha demostrado ser altamente exitoso y su ventaja es más efectiva para clones que son susceptibles a varias restricciones para la producción (Cuadro 4-20) (CIAT, 1987a).Corte. Para el corte de las estacas se deben tener en cuenta dos aspectos: la longitud y la edad o ubicación de la estaca dentro de la planta.La longitud de las estacas es importante por el número de nudos y por la cantidad de reservas nutricionales y humedad que contengan. El número de nudos está estrechamente relacionado con la variedad, la edad de la planta y de la estaca. siembra está libre de añublo bacterial, se debe tratar con fungicidas a base de cobre, los cuales inhiben la multiplicación de la bacteria (Lozano, 1991).Huevos y adultos de ácaros y de insectos como escamas, piojo harinoso (Phenacoccus sp.) y trips se pueden eliminar mediante inmersión de las estacas en una solución de insecticidas tales como el Malatión (CIAT, 1987b).• Proteger las estacas de patógenos e insectos en el sitio de la siembra. En el Cuadro 4-22 se relacionan algunos tipos de tratamiento a las estacas, incluyendo dos que no requieren la utilización de productos químicos.Las diferencias en producción atribuidas a la selección y al tratamiento de las estacas son más notorias cuando se utilizan clones susceptibles o afectados, que cuando se utilizan clones resistentes.Puede ocurrir, sin embargo, que con la selección y tratamiento de las estacas no se manifieste un efecto benéfico en los siguientes casos:• Cuando la selección y el tratamiento se hacen en tallos de plantas vigorosas que crecen en una región sin problemas patológicos, entomológicos o con problemas leves.• Cuando se utiliza para el tratamiento un producto inadecuado contra el patógeno que afecta la estaca o infesta el suelo donde se hará la siembra.En un cultivo destinado a producir material de siembra, los costos de producción, básicamente, son los mismos en que se incurriría para producir solamente raíces, excepto la protección adicional que se daría a la parte aérea, para garantizar que la semilla obtenida esté libre de plagas y patógenos.El control de enfermedades se hace, casi exclusivamente, en forma preventiva mediante la utilización de semilla sana y el tratamiento con (Gurnah, 1974).Tratamiento químico. Las estacas, una vez sembradas, pueden ser atacadas por insectos y por agentes patógenos del suelo que, por lo general, afectan inicialmente las yemas; también pueden penetrar por las raicillas y la base de los retoños o por los extremos de las estacas y heridas causadas en el manipuleo.La selección del material de siembra, evitando su introducción desde regiones en que haya presencia de enfermedades o insectos que se transmitan a través de las estacas, y el tratamiento químico de las mismas son prácticas que ayudan a reducir el riesgo de daños causados por estos patógenos e insectos. El tratamiento químico puede actuar de varias maneras, según el caso:• Erradicar patógenos presentes. Aunque no se recomienda la utilización de material de siembra afectado por Sphaceloma manihoticola (superalargamiento) o por Diplodia manihotis (pudrición seca), cuando esto sea absolutamente necesario, se deben escoger las plantas menos afectadas y tratarlas con Captafol o con productos a base de cobre en el caso del superalargamiento y con Benomyl, en el caso de la pudrición seca. El Benomyl es un fungicida de acción sistémica, que también es útil en el tratamiento curativo de estacas afectadas por Fusarium spp. y por Scytalidium spp. (Lozano, 1991).• Inactivar un patógeno presente. Cuando no se tenga la certeza de que un material de fungicidas. En el campo, el costo adicional estaría representado por la eliminación de plantas contaminadas y la posible aplicación de insecticidas para controlar insectos vectores.El control de plagas, en cambio, requiere habitualmente utilización de insumos, bien sea biológicos o químicos. La obtención de semilla libre de adultos o huevos de insectos y ácaros, implica el empleo de, aproximadamente, 10% más de dichos insumos; pero como este rubro representa una proporción muy baja de los costos de producción (menos de 5%), esto significa que para establecer plantas adultas de yuca destinadas a producir semilla, el costo sería casi igual al de producción de raíces.Si el costo de producción de las plantas se sufraga con la venta de las raíces, el costo de producción de la semilla estaría entonces representado en las actividades de poscosecha (Cuadro 4-23), siendo menor el costo si el material se corta y empaca inmediatamente después de la cosecha, y mayor si es necesario almacenarlo.En el último caso, mientras mayor sea el tiempo de almacenamiento, mayor será el costo por estaca, debido a que el deterioro que sufren los tallos hace que se aumente la proporción de desperdicio.Aunque en el campo las mejores plantas pueden producir hasta 12 estacas a los 12 meses (2.3 ramas por planta y 5 a 6 estacas en cada rama), en la práctica, de una hectárea sembrada a 1 x 1 m no se obtienen 120,000 estacas por las siguientes razones:1. En los cultivos, generalmente, se encuentran algunas plantas con desarrollo inferior: una o todas sus ramas no reúnen las condiciones para ser utilizadas como semilla.2. No es práctico ni rentable esperar hasta cuando las plantas tengan 12 meses para efectuar la cosecha; por lo tanto, habría que iniciar el arranque alrededor de los 10 meses de edad para poder tener tiempo de realizar la cosecha y preparar el terreno para una nueva siembra. Comercialmente, lo que se consigue en una hectárea es alrededor de 17,000 ramas, de las cuales se obtienen unas 80,000 estacas (Cuadro 4-24).Si los operarios no tienen que recorrer mucha distancia, con 14 jornales se recolectan los tallos aptos para semilla que se producen en una hectárea (aproximadamente, 16,000 tallos). CIAT, 1987a. b. Lozano, 1991. c. Alvarez et al., 1998. d. Alvarez (comunicación personal).Teniendo los tallos reunidos, se procede a cortarlos en estacas de 20 cm, para lo cual se utiliza un número de jornales que varía según el método empleado, así:• Con machete y sosteniendo el tallo en una mano, se pueden cortar por jornal 3000 estacas de variedades de tallo blando.• Con machete, pero apoyando el tallo sobre un madero, se pueden cortar hasta 8000 estacas por día.• Con una sierra circular, accionada por un motor de 3 caballos de fuerza, se pueden cortar entre 15,000 y 18,000 estacas por jornal, dependiendo de la variedad: son más rendidoras las que no ramifican o que, por ramificar tardíamente, tienen tallos largos.Es recomendable poner uniformemente el mismo número de estacas en cada saco, ya que esta medida facilita el control del número de estacas cortadas (total y por jornal), el número de estacas transportadas y el número de estacas sembradas (total y por jornal).La forma de empacar las estacas depende de la distancia del sitio de siembra. Así, la semilla que se va a utilizar a una corta distancia se puede empacar sin mayores precauciones, pero la que se debe transportar a sitios distantes es preferible empacarla en forma ordenada, como se ilustra en la Figura 4-9, lo cual permite colocar varios bultos de semilla, uno encima de otro, sin ocasionar daños físicos a las estacas durante el cargue, descargue y transporte.Con un jornal se empacan alrededor de 20,000 estacas en forma desordenada y 10,000 en forma ordenada.Las semillas mejoradas son el insumo biológico a través del cual se incorporan nuevas tecnologías biogenéticas a los sistemas de producción. Por consiguiente, su escasez puede constituirse en una barrera muy seria para la diseminación y utilización de nuevas variedades; por el contrario, su disponibilidad donde se las necesita y cuando se las necesita, pueden constituir un factor decisivo para la adopción de tecnologías y el desarrollo agrícola.El desarrollo de sistemas organizados de abastecimiento de semilla en casos de cultivos con mercados atomizados e inestables, es un campo subinvestigado, y en cultivos como la yuca, casi nulo. En el mejor de los casos se hace alguna investigación en las tecnologías biológicas para la producción y conservación de la semilla; pero pasa inadvertido el desarrollo de funciones esenciales que permitan instituir un sistema organizado, que acelere el flujo de las tecnologías genéticas de la fase de la investigación a la fase de utilización masiva.A esto se agrega que la yuca es un cultivo de agricultores con recursos escasos; el cultivo se incrementa muy lentamente (un año) y su índice de multiplicación es muy bajo (5-10 estacas por cada estaca sembrada). El sistema de abastecimiento es predominantemente tradicional, es decir, que el agricultor guarda su semilla y no existe tradición de compra ni venta de semillas. La naturaleza voluminosa de la semilla es poco conducente para su movimiento entre regiones y comunidades.La aparición de variedades mejoradas y la incorporación del cultivo a nuevos mercados industriales, constituyen factores positivos que permiten generar un interés en las semillas mejoradas. Pero dadas las características del cultivo y los sistemas de producción, es evidente que el sistema de abastecimiento de semillas, tanto en lo organizacional como en la tecnología de producción, debe ser ajustado para asegurar su funcionamiento bajo las condiciones reales del cultivo.Particularmente, debe evitarse imponer a la yuca las exigencias formales que existen para otros cultivos con muchos años de historial Figura 4-9. Las estacas se deben empacar en forma ordenada, como se ve en los sacos a la derecha.El material con el que se fabrican los sacos influye en el costo final de las estacas, debido, por un lado, al costo mismo del saco y, por otro, a la diferente cantidad de solución que se requiere.Aunque son muy apropiados para empacar estacas, los sacos de fique son los menos recomendables, debido a que tienen un costo cinco veces más alto, y absorben casi 10 veces más solución que los sacos de polipropileno.Así, usando sacos de fique, se gastan 35 lt de solución para tratar 10,000 estacas, de las cuales sólo 10 lt se usan realmente en el tratamiento de las estacas, ya que los restantes 25 lt se quedan empapados en el saco (1 lt por saco); mientras que empleando sacos de polipropileno se gastan menos de 15 lt para tratar las 10,000 estacas. semillero. La producción de semilla de yuca, evidentemente, no atrae capitales grandes como el maíz híbrido o el arroz, por lo cual habría que pensar en programas gubernamentales subsidiados para la producción y distribución de semilla, o en desarrollar sistemas sostenibles bajo las circunstancias del agricultor yuquero, poniendo especial atención a las condiciones socioeconómicas de éste, la naturaleza biológica del cultivo y su semilla, y la escasa disponibilidad de recursos humanos, físicos e institucionales en las regiones objetivo.El establecimiento de un sistema de abastecimiento de estacas de buena calidad es importante porque:• Aumenta la productividad del cultivo.• Reduce la diseminación de plagas y enfermedades.• Aumenta el ciclo de vida de los genotipos.• Permite un uso más eficiente de los insumos agrícolas.Por otra parte, si los agricultores disponen de una semilla de buena calidad, el trabajo de investigación en diferentes áreas (mejoramiento, entomología, patología, etc.) tendrá una mejor posibilidad de producir el impacto tecnológico y económico deseado.En términos generales, un programa de semillas determina la posibilidad de garantizar su abastecimiento en una región a través del establecimiento de procedimientos técnicos y de una organización que favorezcan una efectiva transferencia de tecnología con efectos positivos en la producción de yuca.En un programa de semillas son deseables las siguientes características:• Producir cantidades significativas de semilla que permitan la rápida expansión del área cultivada o de nuevas variedades.• Debe contar con un mecanismo eficiente de control de calidad.• Debe producir semillas de una calidad por lo menos equivalente a la mejor fuente disponible.• Debe vender las semillas a un precio aceptable para los usuarios.• Debe producir las semillas mediante un esquema organizacional autosostenido.• Debe contar con mecanismos eficientes de acceso a nuevas variedades, asistencia técnica y capacitación, entre otros.Parecía evidente que la producción de estacas de yuca de tan alta calidad, que pudiera alcanzar finalmente la categoría de certificada, debería encargarse preferiblemente a empresas de semillas ya establecidas que, por tener una buena organización para la distribución y por contar con un sistema de control de calidad, ofrecieran garantías para producir semilla de alta calidad.En su defecto, se podría encomendar este trabajo a agricultores progresistas, también, con experiencia en el área de producción de semillas.Para tal efecto, se redactó un documento en el que se establecían los requisitos mínimos que deberían tener las estacas de yuca de las distintas categorías (básica, certificada y seleccionada), y se inició la producción de este material de siembra. El funcionamiento de este esquema no fue satisfactorio, por los siguientes motivos: a. El precio de las raíces de yuca no es estable a través del tiempo. De acuerdo con la mayor o menor área sembrada, que conduce a una mayor o menor oferta, también cambia el precio de las raíces. Cuando el precio es alto y los agricultores prevén una alta rentabilidad del cultivo, aumenta la demanda por estacas, y los agricultores están más dispuestos a pagar por ellas. Pero cuando el precio de las raíces es bajo, no hay demanda de semilla, lo cual desestimula a los productores, quienes finalmente optan por abandonar la actividad.b. El agricultor que compra estacas de yuca por primera vez trata de seguir produciendo su propia semilla mientras le sea posible. Los productores convencionales de semillas prefieren los cultivos de los cuales puedan producir semillas híbridas que los agricultores no puedan multiplicar, manteniendo así \"cautivos\" a los clientes.c. La producción de semilla vegetativa de yuca es para los productores convencionales de semilla una actividad totalmente extraña, ya que no pueden emplear en ella su infraestructura de limpieza, acondicionamiento, secamiento, etc.d. Las empresas de semillas tienen centralizada la producción para abastecer grandes áreas, lo cual es razonable para los granos, pero no en el caso de estacas de yuca que, por su gran peso y volumen, dificultan el manipuleo y transporte; además, no pueden almacenarse por períodos prolongados.Las condiciones del mercado y la naturaleza biológica de este tipo de semilla indican claramente la necesidad de un sistema alternativo de producción y distribución. El esquema que se propone está concebido como un sistema organizado, en el que los diferentes participantes llevan a cabo funciones diferentes pero complementarias, y en conjunto persiguen un objetivo común: asegurar la disponibilidad de semilla de buena calidad en el momento oportuno y a un precio razonable.Estas funciones, que deben estar ligadas como eslabones de una cadena, son: generación de nuevas variedades, producción de semilla básica, producción y distribución de semilla comercial y utilización de la misma por parte de los agricultores.Está a cargo de las entidades nacionales e internacionales de investigación en fitomejoramiento. Incluye pruebas de adaptación a los diferentes agroecosistemas, resistencia a plagas y enfermedades, rendimiento, calidad de las raíces, entre otras.Esta labor debe realizarla la entidad nacional de investigación o de producción de semillas. Dada la adaptación de las variedades a regiones específicas y la naturaleza voluminosa y perecible de la semilla, sería preferible regionalizar esta producción. semillas es muy parecida a la que producen los propios agricultores.Debido a que la tasa de multiplicación tan baja de la yuca no permite suministrar en corto tiempo abundante cantidad de estacas de las nuevas variedades o de estacas sanas de las variedades tradicionales, se implementó una metodología que contribuye a resolver este problema.Aunque recientemente se han desarrollado otras variantes, la propagación rápida de estacas de yuca se puede realizar básicamente mediante dos sistemas:Consiste en la inducción de brotes y su posterior enraizamiento, a partir de estacas de dos nudos para este fín se utilizan plantas adultas de las cuales se obtienen alrededor de 100 estacas cuando se utilizan variedades de ramificación tardía, y unas 80 cuando se trata de variedades de ramificación temprana.Las estacas de dos nudos sembradas en cámaras de propagación producen brotes o retoños en cantidades que dependen de la variedad y del tipo de estaca utilizada. Así, algunas variedades poco vigorosas cesan pronto la producción de brotes, mientras otras continúan produciéndolos aun después de un año.En promedio, cada estaca de dos yemas llega a producir alrededor de ocho retoños en un año, cortando cada 20 días, en forma alterna, un brote de cada yema, por lo cual de una planta adulta de ramificación tardía se pueden obtener, en un año, hasta 800 retoños.Procedimiento. Consta de los pasos siguientes:• Se seleccionan en el campo plantas de alto rendimiento, sanas y maduras (alrededor de 10 meses de edad).• Se cortan estacas de dos yemas, utilizando una sierra desinfectada con hipoclorito de sodio, formol o alcohol.• Se hace tratamiento químico a las estacas durante 5 minutos en una solución de uno o varios fungicidas con insecticidas.• Las estacas se siembran en posición horizontal en un substrato compuesto de arena y suelo, colocado sobre una base de grava, con el fin de proporcionar un buen drenaje. El substrato debe estar contenido en camas de 2.2 x 1.2 x 1.2 m, rodeadas de una canaleta angosta, donde se deposita agua que, al evaporarse, permite mantener una humedad relativamente alta.• Se coloca un techo de plástico transparente, que cubra la cama y la canaleta, de tal manera que se forme una cámara de propagación, donde la alta temperatura, junto con la alta humedad relativa, estimulen el brote de las yemas (Figura 4-10).Figura 4-10. Cámara húmeda.• Cuando alcancen una altura de 5-10 cm, los retoños se cortan a 1 cm por encima del cuello, utilizando una cuchilla afilada que se haya desinfectado con uno de los productos mencionados anteriormente. Cada estaca de dos yemas puede proporcionar alrededor de ocho retoños, dependiendo de la variedad y el vigor de la estaca.• A cada retoño se le cortan las hojas, dejando únicamente las del cogollo para evitar el marchitamiento. Al tallito se le hace un corte definitivo, exactamente por debajo de una yema, con el fin de estimular el enraizamiento. Inmediatamente después, los retoños se colocan en un recipiente con agua hervida fría, para detener la emanación del látex (Figura 4-11).• Para su enraizamiento, los brotes se pasan definitivamente a frascos con agua, los cuales se colocan en una cámara de enraizamiento, consistente en una mesa provista de estructura de aluminio o de madera, para soportar un plástico a modo de cobertura.• A las 2 ó 3 semanas, los retoños están listos para ser sembrados directamente en el campo o en bolsas plásticas, donde se ambientan para su posterior transplante (Figura 4-12).La ambientación se debe hacer preferiblemente en una casa de malla especial, que impida el ingreso de insectos vectores de enfermedades causadas por virus, como es el caso de las moscas blancas (Figura 4-13).Se puede elegir entre dos modalidades de trabajo:• Producción continua del material de siembra Cada 3 semanas, que es la frecuencia de corte, se pueden ir llevando al campo los retoños ya ambientados, de tal manera que cuando ocurra el corte no. 18, un año después de iniciado el trabajo, los retoños del primer corte se habrán convertido en plantas adultas, obteniéndose finalmente un total de 8000 estacas de 20 cm a partir de cada planta madre.• Obtención de retoños durante 9 semanasSi tomamos como ejemplo la siembra en el primer semestre (abril-mayo), es necesario sembrar las cámaras húmedas en enero, ya que para esta época las plantas madre sembradas en la anterior temporada tendrán una edad de 8 a 9 meses. Si la siembra de las cámaras se hace con mayor anticipación para realizar más cortes y obtener un mayor número de retoños, las plantas madres tendrán poco material de siembra.Sembrando en enero, el primer corte se hace en febrero, y si se continúan haciendo cortes cada 20 días, se alcanzaría a hacer un total de cuatro cortes de brotes, que estarían listos para sembrar antes de que termine el período de lluvias.En estas condiciones, se obtienen alrededor de 300 retoños que, convertidos en plantas y cosechadas todas simultáneamente 1 año más tarde, pueden producir 3000 estacas comerciales.Aunque se requiere más equipo que el sistema de retoños, su potencial de propagación es mucho mayor, ya que en 1½ años es posible producir alrededor de 60,000 estacas a partir de una sola planta madre.Consiste en inducir el enraizamiento de una yema que se toma con su correspondiente hoja. El procedimiento es el siguiente:• A plantas seleccionadas, de 3 a 4 meses de edad, se les cortan las hojas bien desarrolladas, con una cuchilla afilada y desinfectada. El corte debe incluir una pequeña cantidad del tallo. Los folíolos se recortan, dejando menos de la mitad de su longitud.• Los esquejes se colocan inmediatamente en un recipiente con agua hervida fría, para evitar el derramamiento de látex.• Luego se llevan a la cámara de enraizamiento, que consiste en una mesa metálica provista de una estructura de aluminio que a su vez se cubre con plástico. La cámara tiene dos lados donde el plástico se puede abrir a manera de cortina, para colocar o retirar el material y para permitir la aireación. En la parte alta de la estructura se colocan aspersores muy finos para mantener los esquejes bajo nebulización continua durante 12 horas diarias.• Los esquejes se siembran en bandejas de plástico o asbesto, cuyo sustrato es arena gruesa esterilizada; las bandejas se ubican sobre la mesa. Las hojas quedan inclinadas, apoyándose en hileras de alambre que se colocan a una altura de 20 cm sobre la superficie de la mesa.• A los 8-15 días, cuando las raíces tienen aproximadamente 1 cm de largo y se ha desprendido el pecíolo, los brotes están listos para ser sembrados en bolsas plásticas, para su ambientación durante 3 semanas en la casa de malla. Luego se llevan al campo y en 5 meses serán nuevas plantas madre, de las cuales se obtendrán más hojas para propagar.","tokenCount":"11085"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1543650567.json b/data/part_2/1543650567.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c5be6fb0f88e2db1064d96cc591375e41ebe13e4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1543650567.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"1d92ee0832a86127850250b433e65962","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/fafde4fd-65cd-4f55-a4a4-1b3dccb32cb4/retrieve","id":"-1772223977"},"keywords":["\"-.r -",", . , .... .,","_;,) f'~\"-,~, .. -,_(\"\"'J UNICA~","L: iO.:'.:.",",c,Ul Y"],"sieverID":"754a63b0-53f2-4f7a-9d8a-f649a75710b4","pagecount":"18","content":"The members of the EAC wish to thank the members of PROFlSMA and EMBRAP A for their warm hospitality during the course of the mission. In particular the EAC is grateful for the open and friendly manner in which PROFlSMA staff discussed their work with the EAC. While sometimes loud, the interactions were always positive, and contributed greatly to a successful review.There is a great need for environmentally sound crop protection for cassava, a staple food for millions of people, panicular! y the poor, in South America and Africa.Accordingly, UNDP approved in January 1993 a project to be executed by CIAT and llTA \"to develop, test and implement sustainable cassava protection technology for the most damaging insect (sic) pests found in nonheast Brazil and in the African countries\". (p.3. ofUNDP Recommendation to the Administrator appended to the PROJEcr DOCUMENT for GL0/91/013). (Ibis project is not restricted to insect pests, but also includes plant pathogens and weeds). The project, with a budget ofjust over $10 mili.(U.S.), aims to achieve by the end of its four year duration (p.20 of PROJEcr DOCUMENT):1) enhanced national research capability, 2) farmer knowledge through training, 3) technology adoption, and 4)improved yield and quality of cassava. These aims are to be attained through three \"interrelated and panially concurren! phases\" dealing with (p.18 of PROJEcr DOCUMENT):1)refining the e.xisting knowledge base through diagnostic surveys, •z)farrner panicipation in research and development of relevant crop protection methods, with concomitan! training of farmers, extension workers and researchers, and 3) evaluation of progress in achieving training and technology implementation.The South American pan of the project (PROFISMA) is administered pan! y by CIAT and pan! y by the Brazilian federal government's agricultura! research station (EMBRAP A) at whose research station (CNPMF) the project's principal activities are based. IICA is also involved insofar as the PROFISMA staff in Brazil are officially IICA staff. The African component of the project (ESCaPP) is administered separately by llTA and four panicipating governments.Although the project was approved retroactive to 1 January, 1993, the South American component was not initiated un ti! the Iast quaner of 1993. Thus this review occurred approximately one year after the project's inception.The terms of reference of the EAC included: 1) reviewing the quality, focus and progress ofthe project, with particular reference to research, training and collaboration,2) evaluating the management and administration of the project,3) providing suggestions to improve the probability that the project will have an importan! impact on cassava production, and 4) providing other relevant comments and suggestions.Because the EAC concurred strongly with the farrner-centered nature of the ' project document, it adopted as its principal criterion for examining project activities the implicit question \"what does this do for the small farmer?\" Although the project document does not use the term \"integrated pest management\" (IPM), the objectives are consistent with the principies of IPM. Hence during two days of field visits and three subsequent days of discussions with project personnel, the EAC conducted its review with these principies in mind.In the following review the EACs impressions of the key aspects of various components of the project are described. Specific suggestions are formulated in bold face• as 21 recommendations, although other suggestions may be embodied in the text.The report may contain sorne factual or interpretive errors. In large part any inaccuracy probably. was caused by the excessive amount of time required for Portuguese/English translations (and vice versa) of all discussions, allovting the EAC little opportunity to verify all of the contents of this re port.The EAC welcomed the program of field visits as proposed by PROFlSMA.These visits allowed first-hand observation of the efficacy of the project's farmercentered approach and the agro-ecological context in which PROFlSMA opera tes.On Monday, 29 August the EAC visited farms in the vicinity ofPiritiba, 300 km west of Cruz das Almas in the \"Agreste\" agro-ecological zone, intermediate between the humid coastal zone and the semi-arid \"Sertáo\" ofthe interior. The EAC observed severa! on-farrn trials and witnessed the explanation of these trials by PROFlSMA staff to farmers on whose fields they were conducted. Four pertinent points arose from this experience.• 1)The growers were attentive and interacted in a free and frank manner with the PROF1SMA team. They did not appear to be overawed by any of their visitors.2)The PROF1SMA professionals used plain, straight-forward Portuguese or even the growers' own idiom, and refrained complete! y from baffling \"techno-talk\".3)The growers evideñtly appreciated the chance to observe t1le experiments in progress and the invitation to be present when the experiments are evaluated after three years. A clever enticement was provided by the PROF1SMA team in that the growers will be welcome to obtain planting material at will from the plants after the experiments are completed.The local \"prefeito\" (approximately equivalen! to Mayor) attended !he field visit. Despite an impending election, he confined bis well-informed public remarks to agricultura! tapies, rather than electioneering, apparently reflecting his respect for agricultura! science and the PROF1SMA project.On Tuesday, 30 August, the EAC visited the \"Colonia de Roberto Santos\", a small-farmer settlementlocated in the coastal zone about 200 km northeast of Cruz dasAlmas. The growers in this community are part of the participating extension, training and survey components of the PROF1SMA program. In the field the EAC noted an interesting contras! in the altitudes of growers towards the extension staff. On being asked why they accepted the recommendation of the extensionists, sorne growers conveyed the impression that it would be unthinkable to do otherwise. This attitude possibly survives from previous authoritarian top-down relationships. On the other hand, one young grower was bold enough to state \"we believe the 'tecnicos' beca use they have done their experiments here with us\". This is the sort of reaction that the project is expected to generatel The EAC also observed two \"cottage-industry\", cassava-processing factories, where cassava roots are peeled, pulverized, pressed, dried/toasted, sized and bagged for sale as \"farinha\" (cassava flour). These factories are a mix of prívate enterprise capitalism and family-communallabor. The unit is owned by its constructor, who supervises the operations by each grower's family and friends, mainly women and children, in manual peeling and subsequent semi-mechanized steps. The owner receives payment as 20% of the product, which is currently worth ca. 20 Centavos of a Real per kg. There is great potential for improving the welfare of communities with such factories by improving tbe yield and quality of the raw product.Recommendation l. To recogníze their achievement, growers who complete a training program and participate with PROFISMA and extension staff in research and diagnostics should be presented witb a physical symbol oC recognition, perceptible to other members of their community, such as a T -shirt or cap bearing the PROFISMA logo. Growers who have become adept in training programs at diagnosing pest incidence and damage should be given a personal hand-lens as a working diagnostic tool that can be used in caringfor their crop.Recommendation 2. When scheduling permits, field visits for the EAC team should be planned before and arter formal discussions. The latter visit will aUow the EAC to reconfirm or amend its early perceptions prior to rmalizing lis report. Such visits need not be to the same areas. Rec:ommendation 3. Because ot the importance ot the lnitial dlagnostic work with growers, a concerted efrort should be made to accelerate the scientitlc valldation ot the grower dlagnoses and to complete the statistical analysls oC the results ot the . diagnostic study.The EAC again noted that in the second phase of the project \"farmers will participate in the development and testing of a range of crop protection technology components\" (p.l8 of PROJECf DOCUMENT). However, the entire project is projected to last only four years and there is relatively little time to initiate and develop the participatory research program. Moreover, although many of the researchers who appeared befare the EAC were working active! y with growers, none had any training in participatory research and none had yet been involved in such research as part of this project.Recommendation 4. In order to ensure that the participatory research efrort is successful, a smaU group of researchers, growers and extension workers should be brought together immediately to begin participatory research in a pilot p~oject involving an IPM component tbat is clearly ready for practic:al application.Cassava Green Mi te (CGM)CGM is a subject of critica! importance to the PROF!SMA effort, because its control is needed in the ]PM program, and the chances of its regulation by classical biological control are excellent. The two principal aspects of ongoing biological control work: are: 1) selection and release of predaceous, phytoseiid mites adapted to dry and humid cassava-growing regions, and 2) characterization, conservation, and perhaps importation into Africa, of Neozygites sp., a fungus which occurs naturally at epizootic levels in some cassava-growing regions of Brazil. Emphasis at present is on three species of phytoseiid mites currently in rearing at CNPMF, but releases of small numbers of these mi tes in fields heavily infested with CGM have apparently not resulted in their successful establishment.Reconunendation 5. Since there may be etrective and easUy reared predatory mites as yet undiscovered, survey lor other species and biotypes should be continued throughout the natural range of CGM, particularly In dry areas where NeozygiJes is not very effective.Thc rearing of largc numbers of predaceous phytoseiid mi tes for rclease in classical biological control is a critica! componen! of this projcct. Because this effort is limited at present by the inability lo rear largc numbcrs of cassava green miles in Brazil, thc EAC met separately with a small group of scienlists concemcd wilh Ibis problem.Thc scienlists' opinion lhal rearing of lhese miles sho11ld takc place at EMBRAP A in Cruz das Almas was supported by lhe EAC. In touring lhe station, thc EAC confirmed thal adequate facilities for rearing of predalors were available, that lhe principal scientists involved were highly compeleni, and lhal limited production of the cassava grcen mite was indeed a majar impedimenl The impedimenl would be relieved if a a dedicaled scrcen-house for rearing CGM were conslrucled. The enlarged prey and predalor rearing program would rcq~ire a full time Research Assistanl (not a degree-holding professional). A good phasc-contracl compound microscope is rcquired for confirmalion of the idenlity of predaceous phyloseiids in rearing, and for identifying new specimens from field colleclions. Such a microscope has been budgcled for, bul is nol yet purchased. Finally therc will be a need for ongoing malerials and supplies.The approximate costs (SUS) for lhese items are as follows: The EAC noted that nucleic acid or antibody-based identification of predator mites is possible. However, it felt that development ofsuch techniques is not immediately necessary if adequate microscopic capability is provided.Neozygires sp. is apparently already important in controlling CGM populations in humid to semi-humid regions of Brazil. This is a very interesting and importan! (hot) area of study. It m ay be of central importance in the overall UNDP project in that Brazilian strains may succeed in protecting cassava ftom CGM in Africa follo~ing widespread, classical biological control introductions. Considerably more information is needed on the biology and taxonomy of the fungus. Also practica! studies need to be carried out on schemes to mass produce and release this fungus into the field in an effective manner. These studies would include speed of spore germination as well as spore numbers and rate of spore production. The EAC noted that sorne of the research reported was directed toward sophisticated in vitro culture techniques that were beyond the province of the current PROFISMA project.Recommendation 8. Research on N eozygites sp. in PROFISMA should be llmited only to those propagation and re le ase techniques that ha ve immediate practica! potentiaL The PRQFISMA project may be used as a magnet to attract ancillary runding for more baslc, strategic research.The biological control of these three pests offers sorne unique opportunitics for PROFISMA. For example, the mealybug, Phenacoccus he\"eni, presents an opportunity to utilize classical biological control techniques developed in Africa for P. manihoti. Exploration in the probable site of origin has yielded a number of parasites and predators, plus a fungus. Three of these parasites have been selected for further study, including their interactions in caged environments at CIAT. The EAC especially approves of the recently initiated studies to track parasite spread following release in Brazil, and to make assessments of the environmental impact of these releases.Recommendatlon 9. Based on.the outstanding results otthe Atrlean projeet with parasites oC P. nuznihoti, PROFISMA should engage in an expanded release program of the parasites of P. he\"eni in Brazil. Coneurrently, the seareh should continue ror additional natural enemies.The biological control of cassava hornworm involves the use of a naturally occurring baculovirus, a group of insect-specific viruses of virtually no threat to nontarget organisms. This virus presents an excellent opportunity for participatory research and development with farmers. For example, grower cooperatives could produce and store virus preparations for use when needed by member farmers.Cladosporium sp. There is virtually nothing known outside of Brazil on this fungus. and studies on its biology,-production and applied use are encouraged by the EAC.The EAC commends PROFISMA for planning to conduct studies on the effect of their pest control efforts on non-target organisms. However, the proposed research appeared to be solely on negative effects, and also included laboratory tests on vertebrales.Recommendation 10. Be cause of the strong likelihood tbat none or the biological control agents under consideration will ha ve any adverse environmental impact, studies should concentrate on potential beneficia! impacts, as well as adverse ones, and should be structured so that the data collected are uselul to the overall biological control endeavor.Recommendation 11. Beca use of the requirements for registration or blological pesticides, any testlng of microbial or viral pestlcides on vertebrates, lt required, should be done In a laboratory certified by the appropriate registratlon agency.Extensive studies are underway by PROF1SMA in which pesticides (microbial and chemical) are used experimentally to kili ene or more pests selectively and to leave others on the test plants. These experiments require different treatments in different regions with different pest complexes. By selectively removing cenain pests, the impact of others can be determined. The EAC considers this. research to be importan! in providing area-wide baseline data on the impact of cassava pests. When analyzed statistically the voluminous data being collected can be used to justify research emphasis on the most importan! pests. They can also provide reference points against which new pest control treatments can be measured accurately, and they can be used as a basis for determining benefit/cost ratiosfor the IPM program.Recommendation 12. Statistical analysis of the data on pest-caused crop losses should be expedited.Root rots in the genera Phytophthora and Fusariam are predominan! among the plethora of organisms inhabiting diseased cassava roots, and are judged to be the cause of substantiallosses in certain circumstances. A long-standing research program at CNPMF has yielded a number of management methods that could readily be applied in growers' fields. These methods include: the use of toleran! varieties; compatible interplantings; treatments of cuttings with antagonistic microorganisms, mycorrhyzal fungi and endophytes; planting on furrowed ridges; and rotation with other crops to reduce inocula.Recommendation 13. Consideration should be given by PROFISMA to the rapid lncorporation of these methods into the IPM program In conjunctlon with methods to be used against other pests.This disease has caused a majar problem in the state oí Ceara, and could spread to other areas. Research to determine its vector(s), including ribosomal-based PCR analysis is well underway. In addition, a commendable project is field-testing five resistan! varietics with 70 farmers in 10 crimmunitics. Research is also continuing on disease distribution and yield loss asscssment.Cassava Vein Mosaic Virus (CVMV)The most serious foliar disease in the project region is CVMV. It differs substantially from the cassava mosaic virus in Africa,\" India and Sri Lanka in that it causes substantialleaf-vein clearing and stunting. The disease has been succcssfully transmitted experimentally only through infected stem cuttings and by top grafting. A recently-developed PCR-based detection technique will be useful in detecting virus in imported or exported cuttings, and may be used succcssfully in determining the vector(s). While crop losses due to CVMV have not yet been determined, they are hypothcsized to be substantial. Disease symptoms can be greatly reduced by the use of high-quality planting material. Rccommendation 14. Becausc apparcntly diseasc-Crce plants can be produced Crom high-quality planting material, tralning or growers in good propagatlon techniques should be lncorporated immediately in the participatory IPM program. The production oC vigorous plants may also reduce the impact or other pests.The objectivcs of weed management in cassava are to reduce production costs, increase productivity and preserve soil fertility. Additional outcomes are the prevention of water loss and soil erosion and the provision of reservo ir plants for beneficia! insects.Because the complex of weed species differs even between local arcas, continuing research into management systems will be needed.Recommendation 15. Because the potential galns are great and management techniques tor weeds are well advanced, weed management should be incorporated rapidly into grower participation IPM.• Recommendation 16. In addition to assessing the acceptability oC weeds for beneficia) insects occurring naturally in the tteld, collaborative research should be done which assesses the acceptability o{ various weed species as reservoirbosts for the phytoseüd mites being considered for classical biological control of the CGM.Because of the vigorous, ongoing research on agronomic practices, an E.\\4BRAPA plan! physiologist, who was not previously in PROFISMA, has been attracted to work in the proj ect. His work on the effect of various weed management regimes on the growth and water relations of cassava will assist in selecting the best cover crop treatment for improving the hydric conditions for the cassava crop.In the field and in formal discussion the effect of cassava in depleting soil nutrients, particular) y nitro gen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium, was emphasized. Converse) y, great gains in productivity can be achieved by such techniques as mulching. The EAC was intrigued by the very positive results of an ambitious project involving many growers in Ceara, in which cassava crops are mulched with debris from camauba palm fronds harvested for their wax. It appears that such techniques-would b.e useful in other arid areas.In general, the EAC found that in a cursory examination the experiments being conducted by PROFISMA were of sound design. Yet virtually all biological scientists, including members of the EAC, ha ve encountered situations in which experiments that appeared to be of sound design, were rightly criticized for deficiencies found after the fact by externa) rcviewers. In most cases there was insufficient time for the EAC to examine experimental design dosel y. It might ha ve been useful had further discussion taken place when the EAC had concems about such factors as adequate replication, size of field plots, buffer zones, testing more than ene hypothesis in the same experiment, and the statistical analysis of data. The EAC noted that in most research groups, scientists discuss their proposed experiments with others (often heatedly), and in most govemment research stations in North America, the station statistician must approve the experimental design and the proposed altematives for statistical analysis of the data prior to initiating an experiment.Recommendatlon 17. PROFISMA should selecta small group o!scientists wbo are experfenced in experimental design and analysfs o! data to serve as a consulting group Cor other scientists. The objectives o!the consulting group would be to ensure that there is confidence in the expected results and that statistical analysis can be done rapidly and routinely after the experiment.PROJECf MANAGEMENT Throughout its mission, the EAC was aware that it was evaluating both CIAT and CNPMF activities. This was not easy for two reasons: 1) lack of physical presence of the EAC in Columbia for first-hand observations of GIAT operations, and 2) the apparently harmonious integration of the activiiies of both institutions, so that it was difficult at times to tell where the efforts by one institution stopped and those of the other staned. In pan the integration of activities has been facilitated by the fact that one of the two Scientific Coordinators and the Training Coordinator of PROFISMA are CIA T employees seconded to CNPMF. The successful integration has been further facilitated by the efforts of CIAT and CNPMF personnelto make their work truly intemational in its scope. However, future EACs would be well advised to compare progress, workplans and budgets to determine just how integrated the South American work really is. The project monies are necessarily administered in a tortuous fashion involving initial disbursement of funds to CIAT, and secondary disbursement of the Brazilian componen! toan account in Brasilia from which EMBRAPA can draw. CIAT charges 14% overhead on its ponion of the project budget and 4% of the EMBRAPA componeilt. Initially there was no overhead retumed to EMBRAPA, a 5% charge is now levied, and this may have to be increased in the future.Severe limitations in the progress of the PROFISMA effort have occurred in the inability of the EMBRAP A bureaucracy to respond to the PROFISMA need for rapid purchases of equipment, e.g. the phase-<:ontrast microscope needed for the predaceous mi te work ora rotary evaporator required in the weed science project. Various solutions Page 13 to this dilemma were explored, e.g. procurement through UNDP, or having CIAT make purchases and donating the items te EMBRAPA, with a corresponding reduction in the EMBRAPA componen! of the budget. Recommendation 18. EMBRAP A/CNPMF should do its utmost to streamline its procurement procedures so that PROFISMA activities are not delayed. lfthis is not possible, PROFISMA, with the assistance ofUNDP, shciuld flnd a way to bypass EMBRAPA.A review of the 1993 and 1994 budgets disciosed a substantial surplus from 1993 and projected under expenditures for 1994. These ha ve resulted from such factors as late start of the project (even though payment was made ri:troactive te 1 January 1993) as weil as delays in hiring personnel or retaining consultants for whom salaries had been budgeted, and correspondingly reduced needs for iogistic and material support. It was noted that UNDP permits the carry-over of budget surpiuses into succeeding years, and that the developing PROF1SMA program wiil easily absorb these surpluscs with cssential expenditures, e.g. the screen-house for mite rearing, and extra vehicles needed because of the huge geographic arca covered by this ambitious project.The degree of flexibility that PROF1SMA has with respect to reailocation of budget items was also explored. It was noted by the EAC that UNDP will tolerate approximately :!:5% leeway en expenditures for most budgeted items. However, further deviations, e.g. using money originaily aiiocated for consultants to purchase a vehicie, would require a revised budget, and if necessary a revised workplan, to be approved by UNDP befare any expenditures were made.The members of the EAC, who are al! scientists with experience managing very large research projects, felt that UNDP budgetary procedures were very restrictive. Most research granting agencies allow the researcher full budget flexibility. They \"audit\" projects primarily en whether or not the scientific and technological output is of the highest quality, in sufficient amount, and more or less en target. (Targets are often met incompletely because scientific research, unlike engineering, always has unanticipated uncertainties that redirect the course of an investigation). However, the EAC felt that in this case, it would be unwise to allow such flexibility in budget administration unless there was very rigorous examination by future EAC's to ensure that expenditures had been made en items that were truiy consisten! with PROF1SMA's objectives.Sorne problems associated with personnel were noted by the EAC. The delay in appointing a National Training Coordinator has impeded progress of the work by the PROFISMA Training Coordinator in grower-related projects. EMBRAPA hadan appointee selected who opted for another opportunity, anda renewed recruitment process is well underway.There is a particular problem with health care benefits for PROFISMA employees, who are administratively classed as employees of llCA, rather than EMBRAP A, and thus are ineligible for benefits. The altematives explored to date are prohibitively expensive, leaving most PROFISMA staff without coverage.Recommendation 19. PROFIS!'rWEMBRAPA should continue to search diligently for a solution to the health care plan dilemma for PROFISMA employees. One possible solution would be for the arrangement oC a special contract with EMBRAPA to cover beneflts only Cor the duration ofPROFISMA.During the hearings, the EAwitnessed two projects by collaborating scientists, a plant physiologist and a virologist, who had been attracted to work in the project by the opportunities for collaborative work in retum for minar supporting budgets, but not salaries. A large project like this can be a magnet for such collaborations, which in tum can provide useful retums to the project. Recommendation 20. As opportunities are disclosed during the course ofresearch, PROFISMA should seek further collaboration with extemal scientists in areas that would contribute to meeting the project's objectives. 'lbere should be sufficient budget flexibility anticipated by UND P to acconunodate provision oC funds Cor su eh collaborations.During the entire week of review, the EAC heard much of impacts caused by various practices and pests, and gains that could be achieved through a multitude of horticultura! and pest management tactics. However, almost never were there monetary values placed on such impacts. If available, such values would provide strong supporting evidence of the true value of the PROFISMA effort and would allow benefit/cost analysis to begin immediately. Recommendation 21. PROFISMA should consider hiriDg a pracdcaUy-orienud economist, perhaps as a consultant, to place monetary values on lmpacts and benefits associaud with the IPM program, and to i.D.itiau benefit/cost studles that can predict the future pay-off' oC the program.","tokenCount":"4241"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1580526410.json b/data/part_2/1580526410.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..58e6d3446c5dfe32bc45219f59cba8b49612fe29 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1580526410.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a9a3c5f565e1e930f75971559a3feb18","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/dc78c4b3-8f65-4763-8b28-64814d3ec4ca/retrieve","id":"-613061678"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"c7650999-61b3-41c5-a351-2d2821484234","pagecount":"26","content":"• 3 components around human nutrition (IFPRI-led)• 1 component on prevention and control of agricultural associated diseases (ILRI-led) Objectives:• To assist rapid integrated assessment of food safety, zoonoses and nutrition in informal livestock value chains as one facet of a comprehensive value chain assessment • To report to livestock value chain managers Key outputs:• Systematic literature review on zoonotic hazards • Situational analysis of enabling environment • Qualitative (rapid) assessment• knowledge, attitudes, practices and incentives (KAPI)• Quantitative assessment• prevalence survey of selected hazards• questionnaire survey with value chain actors Key research questions I/III:• Food safety• What are the main hazards likely to be present in the value chain? • What risks do these hazards pose to value chain actors?• Food and nutrition security• What is the role of the animal-source food in question in diets of poor farmers and consumers? • What is the relationship between livestock keeping and livestock eating?In Uganda and Vietnam, we have completed phase 1 and 2The quantitative assessment, questionnaire survey (and biological sampling)• Producer• Trader (live pigs/pig products)• Bulking point (slaughter)","tokenCount":"176"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1609810348.json b/data/part_2/1609810348.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dafa7c682c9577fd63d7a8ba0612ba898163ac7a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1609810348.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e6c52def9b6a7bba802fabd888260eab","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/bb3bf9af-833f-4aeb-a297-fc393a917bb6/retrieve","id":"1845530595"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"0280a2cb-27fd-40be-be43-19b49f9f9834","pagecount":"32","content":"Regwnal networks ASARECA SACCAR AfNet ECABREN and SABRN (Afnca) SIGTTA (Central Amenca) REDBIO (Latm Amenca) CA TIE and EAP Zamorano (Central Amen ca) Cassava B10technology Network (CBN LAC) FLAR CLA YUCA CGIAR and /lltematwnal orgamzatwns CIP CIMMYT F AO IAEA !CARDA ICRISA T IFPRI liT A IPGRI IRRI TSBF WARDA CGIAR Challenge Programs HarvestPlus Generat10n Challenge Program CGIAR system hnkages Savmg BJOdJversJty (40%) Enhancement & Breedmg (40%) Tra111111g ( 15%) lnformallon (5%)ProJect DescnphonGoal To contnbute to the sustamable mcrease of producllv•ty and nutntwn of mandated and other pnonty crops and the conservatwn of agrob•od1versllyObjechve lntegrate genom1cs and cellular technolog1es wtth breedmg and the conservatwn of gen elle resources to 1) Conserve charactenze and enhance the gen elle d1versJty base needed for future development 2) tmprove the nutntwnal quahty of crops ach1eve and sustam a contmuous yteld mcrease to meet the food needs of a raptdly growmg populallon and 3) 1mprove the hvehhood of the rural poor who have not benefited so far from the technolog•cal advances Importan! Assumphons Pro acllve part•c•pallon of CIAT NARS and NGOs agncultural sc1enhsts bwlogtsts and development personnel Target Ecoregwn Worldwtde serv1ce but spec1al focus m developmg countnes of Latm A menea and Sub Saharan Afnca Benefic1anes and End Users Small farmers ofLatm Amenca Sub Saharan Afnca and Southeast As1a W11l use dozens of germplasm accesswns conserved by the gene bank as such or after •mprovement through btotechnology tools Sources of d1sease and pest res1stance wlll be •denllfied for curren! and future efforts m germplasm enhancement and plant breedmg Natwnal programs wlll have the1r na!lonal collecttons restored CIAT project hnkages Jnputs to SB 2 Germplasm access10ns from the gene bank proJect Segregatmg populat10ns from crop productlVIty proJects Charactenzed msect and pathogen strams and populatlons from crop protect10n proJects GIS serv1ces from the Land Use ProJect Outputs from SB 2 Management of Des1gnated Collectlons (gene banks) genetlc and molecular techmques for the gene bank crop produchvity and smls (mJcrobial) proJects Identified genes and gene combmat10ns for crop productlVIty and protect10n proJects Propagat10n and conservat10n methods and techmques for gene banks and crop productJv!ly proJects lnterspeclfic hybnds and transgemc stocks for crop productlVlty and IPM proJects ExplanatiOn of any ProJect changes (w1th respect to prev10us MTPs) The project takes mio account the recen! changes mtroduced by the Intemat10nal T reaty on Plan! Gene!Ic Resources for Food and Agnculture New collect10n efforts may now be poss1ble for cassava and beans w1th agreement w1th the countnes Tropical forages do not however enJOY facJhtated access status so distnbutlOn and conservat10n of forage genet1c resources reqUires bilateral negotiations on a country by country bas1s The m1crosatelhte markers we have developed at CIAT have g1ven us the opportumty to d1ssect genet1c d1versl!y m common bean on a larger scale and lo a finer degree than has ever been poss1ble before The most polymorph1c and rehable SSR loc1 have been Jdenllfied based on a m1cro core of 44 CIAT parents and evaluatwn of !50 microsatelhte markers A manuscnpt was prepared on the d1scnmmatwn power and allehc d1versl!y values for all these m1crosatelhte markers and ws accepted m Theorellcal and Apphed GenetJcs The research was the bas1s for marker selectwn m addJtJOnal d1verslly stud1es carned out or fimshed dunng the year Two notable stud1es that were part of MSc degrees at the Umv Nac1onal extended the evaluallon ofthe loe¡ by testmg the rehabll1ty of 30 to 50 m1crosatelhte markers m detectmg race structure m common beans In these stud1es a total of 120 genotypes were selected to represen! the three races present m each of the gene pools of common bean (Andean and Mesoamencan) and race structure analys1s showed that commercJal seed class was a good pred1ctor of race structure and was better than morphologJcal d1fferences at d1stmgmshmg races As a result the pnnc1pal dJVISIOns m common bean can be descnbed as Durango Jahsco Mesoamenca Nueva Granada and Peru Races Chile and Guatemala appear to be adm1xtures of new alleles perhaps from WJ!d bean mtrogresswn Another mterestmg result was the findmg that for m1crosatelhte markers allehc dJvers1ty IS h1gher m the Andean gene pool than m the Mesoamencan gene pool a reversa! from prevwus stud1es w1th other types of markers wh1ch w11l allow the use of m¡crosatelhtes lo a greater degree to mvesllgate tral! mhentance m the Andean gene pool In parallel w1th !he work on race structure we are analyzmg data for the m1crosatelhte evaluatwns of the Andean and Mesoamencan core collectlons (350 genotypes each) and the nallonal or CIA T collectwns for BoliVIa Braz1l Chma Colombia and Cuba wh1ch were conducted as part of the Generatwn Challenge Program A pubhcatlon on the Colomb1an collectwn has been pubhshed and a mansucnpt has been prepared for the Mesoamencan racesWe hope to use th1s mfonnatwn for assoc1atwn mappmg stud1es and to gmde evaluatJon of other natwnal collectwns espec1ally m secondary centers of dJvers1ty such as Afnca and As1a N e\" genetlc markers for marker ass1sted selectlon of common beans at CIA T Marker ass1sted selectwn 1s a pnonty m the bean breedmg program because of the large number of segregants screened and the d1verse array of bw!lc and abJo!lc hmllatlons bemg tackled Unt1l recently all marker ass1sted selectwn m common beans was done w1th SCAR markers In th1s year s annual report we descnbe the development of CAPS (Cleaved Amphfied Polymorph1c Sequence) markers for Apwn godmam res1stance and the screemng ofm¡crosatelhtes for selectmg gemmiVJrus res1stance genes In addl!wn we evaluated COS (Conserved Orthologous Sequence) markers for use m mappmg of drought QTLs Th1s bmlds on expenence w1th low phosphorus tolerance wh1ch 1s a tra1t we ha ve completed a senes of QTL stud1es for and wh1ch ha ve been pubhshed m three consecutlve art1cles m Plan! and Soll Joumal of Functwnal Bwlogy (2004) and Crop Sc1ence (2005) Wh!le dJversifymg the types of markers m use at CIAT we contmue to vahdate SCAR markers m practica! real hfe plan! breedmg situa!Ions Notable for th1s year was the collaboratwn w1th Umv NaciOnal where we have mtrogressed the be 3 res1stance gene for BCMV and the Ca 4' and Co 5 res1stance genes for anthracnose mto large red seeded chmbmg beans for the Colomb1an market The combmatJon of markers was found to work well for chmbmg beans especJally for a shuttle breedmg program between CIAT and Umv Nacional that JS part of a Colciencias funded proJect In th1s proJect marker assJsted selec!Jon and phenotyp1c screenmg m both field and greenhouse Sites IS provmg to be complementary and effic1entTwo MS e students have been tramed from the Umv NaciOnal as part of th1s proJect and are formmg part of a cadre of local practJcwners of marker ass1sted select!On both WJ!hm the academ¡c and pubhc sectors bUJ!dmg on work we d1d m the prevwus two years With CORPOICA EvaluatJOn of nutntwnal quahty tra1ts m common bean Th1s year we report on methodologies we have developed for evaluatmg two an!J nutnents (tannms and phytates) m common beans from d1fferent commerc¡aJ seed classes and among parents of QTL mappmg populatwns In the case of tannms we developed separate cahbratwn curves for tannms Isolated from each commercial seed class We then apphed the cahbratwn curves to evaluate genotype x env1ronment mteractwn of total soluble and msoluble condensed tannms m Andean breedmg !mes grown at three locatwns m Colombia Wlule locatwn effects were found locatwn x genotype mteractwns were not s¡gmficant Furthermore genotyp1c d1fferences m average total condensed seed coat tanmns seemed not to be due to the genotype s seed color With red mottled and large red seeded vanehes havmg similar vanabiiity for tannm Fortunately breedmg for h1gher mmerals m the NUA h1gh mmeral Andean !mes seems not to have mcreased tannm levels Th1s IS Importan! smce these red mottled genotypes have been promoted and Widely tested m Colombia Bolivia and Eastem and Southem Afhca The NUA !mes are also the bas1s for a bwefficacy tnal With Uruv del Valle where they w¡ll be g1ven to pre school ch1ldren m a feedmg program m Cah As part of th1s proJeCt we have mcreased the amount of NUA seed to approx1mately 1 ton of gram both for dJstnbutwn and for the feedmg tnal In terms of seed phytates evaluated for a set of mappmg parents grown under h1gh medmm and low soii phosphorus the h1ghest accumulatmg genotypes were the P meffic1ent genotypes such s DOR364 wh!le the lowest phytate content were found m seed of the P effic1ent genotypes G2333 and G 19839 Th1s has been observed prevwusly m stud1es of low P tolerance where under low P condltions effic1ent genotypes produce a larger amount of gram for a g¡ven amount of sml PIn th1s study the same genotyp1c d¡fferentJatiOn was observed under both medmm h1gh and even low sml P levels especially for the genotype DOR364 although mterestmgly Gl9839 had h1gher phytate content m the medmm P than m h1gh P unhke G2333 that had h1gher phytate content m h1gh P compared to the medmm P treatment Our final goal With the tannm and phytate mformatwn 1s to better understand how to breed common bean for better nutntwnal quahty So far breedmg has been w1th the goal ofh1gher romeral accumulatlon (see th1s year s annua\\ report secuon on the development of the NUA !mes) but m the future we may try to reduce ant1 nutnent content However the results presented th1s year md1cate sorne of the difficulties that may be found With reductwn of tannm or phytate levels Effic1ent protocol for 1solatwn of m1crospores m cassava developed Cassava IS one of the most Importan! calone carbohydrate sources m the trop1cs adapted to a broad range of env1ronments mcludmg tolerance to drought and acidic s01ls Th1s Importan! staple food for subs1stence farmmg IS also becommg an Importan! raw source for mdustnal apphcations worldw1de Cassava breedmg IS cumbersome and meffic1ent compared to other crops Efficient breedmg 1s needed to mamtam cassava s competitiveness respect to other commodities The meffic1ency m cassava breedmg 1s mamly due to 1ts h1ghly heterozygous nature and mbreedmg depresswn affectmg the select10n of early generat10ns of breedmg matenals m rephcated field tnals The m vllro productwn of doubled hapl01ds (DHs homozygous) hnes would serve as a basehne for the development ofpopulat10ns allowmg the ¡denllfical!on ofvaluable recess1ve trmts and prov1dmg the opportumty for the mcorporat10n of molecular tools Th1s proJect seeks the development of an m varo protocol for the generat10n of doubled hapl01ds from cultured anthers or m1crospores v1a androgenes1s estabhshmg a suitable model system for d1fferent ecotypes of cassava Th1s Imllative IS bemg financed by the Rockefeller Foundatwn New York ZIL Sw1tzerland and CIAT Results and deta!led mformatwn are found m SB2 Reports from 2004 and 2005 Smtable genotypes for the development and standardizaiion of a protocol to generate doubled haplo1ds m cassava were Idenllfied after a pre select10n/ evaluatwn of 45 genotypes representmg broad env1ronmental adaptatwn accordmg to the CIAT breedmg program One of the mam bottlenecks affectmg m1crospore culture m cassava was elucidated wh1ch mcludes obtammg h1gh y1eldmg homogenous m1crospore suspens10ns allowmg culture at 10 5 cells/ml A methodology for VIabihty momtonng dunng m1crospore IsolatiOn and the standard¡zallon of protocols for selectmg opllmal plan! donor and l!ssue w1thm the plan! were estabhshed Low temperature has been proven to be a crucial factor for keepmg viabihty of cassava m1crospores dunng the flower bud harvest and IsolatiOn process Factors were Identified allowmg an effective flower bud sh1pment for collaborallon abroad M1crospore separat10n usmg Percoll grad1ent 30 40 50% allowed a cleaner and better separallon of m1crospores by s¡ze and developmental stages than a 50 60 70% grad1ent Results corroborated last year results md1catmg putal!ve cell divisions from pre ch11led tetrads cultured at 10 4 cell/ mi m 85 hqmd medmm at 26 C m the darkness Histological analys1s of cassava microsporogenesis was Imllated m September 2005 Improvements of the protocols were mtroduced and mformallon generated wiii be used to better des1gn a reproducible respons1ve m1crospore culture protocol Curren! work focuses on ta!lored cond11Ions for cultunng m1crospore suspens10n nch m selected type of stage of development The progress attamed and report herem 1s p10neer m the establishment of a reproducible protocol for the generat10n of doubled haplo1ds m cassava PhyhylogenetJc Patterns In The Genns Mamhot Mili (Euphorb1aceae) B10geography And Comparahve Ecology Of Mesoamencan And Southamencan Spec1es Evoluhonary relahonsh1ps among wlld Mamhot spec1es are stlll uncertam Curren! stud1es have emphas1zed on the ongm of cassava (Mamhot esculenta subsp esculenta) one of the most 1mportant crops m tropical countnes without regardmg the rest of spec1es In order to quanhfy mter speclfic genet1c vanab1hty among w1ld Mamhot spec1es and to estabhsh a molecular phylogeny of the genus three plast1d (accD psal spacer trnL F spacer and trnL mtron) and three nuclear DNA regwns (G3pdh CAMI and CAM2) were sequenced Cmdosco/us was mcluded as outgroup Tree topology and geograph1cal d1stnbut10n of spec1es were used to mfer a bwgeograph1c hypothes1s of the genus The age of the d1fferent nodes was eshmated by means of a molecular clock cahbrahon Ecolog1cal data obtamed from the last monograph of Mamhot was also used to mfer the adaptatwn process of the spec1es to the1r curren! hab1tats Nuclear G3pdh was chosen to mfer the evolutwnary relat1onsh•ps of the spec1es due to the lack of vanatwn of the chloroplast genome the possJbllity of gene duphcatwns m the CAMI regwn and the positJve effect of natural selectwn on the CAM2 regwn The phylogeny shows a Central Amencan clade s1ster to the South Amencan spec1es The diverslficatlon of the last clade began m Braz1l dunng the Ple1stocene followed by m1grat1on of spec1es towards other parts of the South Amencan contment Glacml and mterglac1al penods could play an 1mportant role modulatmg the adaptahon to dry hab1tatsThe predommance of shrub forms could occur early m the evolutwn of Mamhot spec1es although a better samphng of spec1es IS needed Molecular marker ass1sted selechon (MAS) for the 1mprovement of local cassava germplasm m Tanzama for pest and d1sease res1stanceThe low adopllon of 1mproved cassava genotypes commg from centrahzed breedmg programs m many Afncan countnes ha ve led to the proposal of a decentrahzed breedmg scheme mvolvmg molecular marker ass¡sted selectwn (MAS) and partiCipatory plant breedmg (PPB) to accelerate the 1mprovement of local farmer preferred vanetles for pest and d1sease res1stance Improved mtroductwns of cassava from CIAT havmg resJstance to the cassava mosa1c d1sease (CMD) and the cassava green m1te (CGM) were evaluated m the field and 80 genotypes selected S1multaneously 27 and 24 vanetles were selected from local var1et1es collected from the Southem and Eastem zones respectlvely From the CIA T mtroductwns and local variehes were estabhshed m a controlled and polycross crossmg block at Chambez1 expenmental statwn Situated about 60km North west of Dar es Salaam To date over 20 000 crosses have been made and at least 40 000 sexual seeds assummg an average of 2 sexual seeds per cross are expected PollmatiOn IS sllll on gomg to ach1eve a target of 60 000 sexual seeds m total The seeds w¡\\1 be planted m January 2006 and molecular markers wlll be used to 1denhfy d1sease and pest res1stant genotypes for transfer to the smgle row tnal stage S1mple sequen ce marker (SSR) evaluatwn of global germplasm resources m cassava Part of the actiVIhes of sub prograrnrne 1 of the Generatwn Challenge Program (GCP) 1s the charactenzatton of global crop genellc resources to define the genehc structure of germplasm collectwns as a first step to lookiDg for new genes and alleles that contnbute to solviDg the challenges of modem agr1culture A decJsion was rnade to analyze 3000 cassava accesswns 1500 accesswns frorn CIA T s world germplasrn collecllon 1000 access10ns from liT A s Afncan collecllon and 500 accesswns from EMBRAP A natwnal cassava gene bank w1th 36 SSR markers Data analys1s IDCludes assessment of genet1c structure usiDg pnnc1pal coordiDate analys1s (PCoA) and rnultldJrnenswnal scahng (MDS) based on mdiVIduals cluster analys1s based on country sarnples and an est1mat10n of genetlc diversity and al!ehc nchness Results obtamed so far are the SSR charactenzatwn of 2 575 genotypes w1th 30 SSR markers A cluster analys1s based on country of ongiD reveal a clear separat10n between access10ns from Afnca and the rest of the world confirmiDg findiDgs from prevwus studJes that shows that global cassava germplasm diversity 1s structured by regwn Sources ofth1s genellc differenllatwn could be seleclion for adaptatwn to agro ecolog1es partlcularly d1seases Other results me lude the Ident1ficat10n of a separat10n of sorne access1ons from Ghana N1gena and Central Arnenca The source of the observed structure could be selectwn m the Afncan accesswns and mtrogresswn frorn w¡Jd relatlves as well as IDdependent dornest1cat10n events for the Central Arnencan access1ons showed the htghest productlVlty Th1s clone was selected by farrners from T1erradentro Cauca and then was evaluated m a dtfferent locatton (Pescador Cauca) Th1s proJect had seta p1lot expenence that now w¡th fundmg from the Mm1stry of Agnculture compettttve gran! JS allowmg expandmg these findmgs to other lulo growmg regwns m Colomb1a mcludmg Valle del Cauca Caldas and Rtsaralda as well as gerrnplasm exchange between fam1ers from dtfferent regtons anda vehtcle to canahzed advanced breedmg lulo matenal from Corpotca lt JS also g1vmg the ground for a regwnal new ¡m!Ja!Jve under forrnula!lon seekmg fundmg from Fontagro that mcludes Ecuador G Problems encountered and the1r soluhonsAs acknow ledged by all the SB 2 staff has managed m the past decade to ratse CIA T profile w1th the research commumty and was successful to secure funds from a w1de range of donors by partiCipatmg m sorne very compe!Jttve grants As the results of the team efforts SB 2 has been able to contnbute stgmficantly to the econom1c health of the center However the d1sproportwnate percentage on overhead and mternal charges 1mposed on SB 2 proJects have stretched SB 2 staff capac1ty The concerns of the team are the curren! sttuatwn where SB 2 staff have a far larger borden than any other proJects to contnbute to the non core fundmg of the center wiii result m a reduced CIA T capac!ly to dehvery on prevwus commttments made to donors Such sttuatwn has affectmg the efforts of the tean1 to 1mprove the mfrastructure of the labs or to hue needed post docs budgeted m sorne spectal proJects D1scusswns wtth management are on gomg to seek a solullon to such problemThe iSsue was raised m 2002 To respond to the need of the proJect the director of research allocated from CIA T strategic resources funds to cover part of the salary of a post doc The rest of the needed funds carne from a small grant from the Generation Challenge Program However the allocatJon iS for one year and iS a temporary measure to address an expandmg need of the team for such expertise While the team has prepared severa! proposals tramed JUmor staff m b10mformat1cs and estabhshed alhance both m Colombia and with ARI the team iS not gettmg the needed support The only immediate solut10n iS to have a post doc for an additJOnal two years with full fundmg from the central strategic funds Need for pbysmlogy support Sb 2 staffhave been qUJte successful m the past three years m ra1smg funds for proJect on ab10t1c stress The proJects mvolve the mtegrahon of breedmg molecular b10logy and phys10logy Such success has pul a heavy burden on Dr Rao the only plant phys10logJSI currently based a headquarters A proposal made by semor management m 2004 to hJre a post doc to work w1th Dr Rao never matenahzed To address such hm1tat10n the team has expanded Jts collaboratwn w1th plant physwlogist workmg at IVIC m Venezuela and prepared a pro posa! that mcluded plant physwlog¡sts from CIRAD Stlil CIA T management needs to address such strategic iSsue at the Center leve! and not a proJect leve! Lack of structured pbenotypic databases One the maJor strength of the mtemahonal centers iS the wealth of phenotyp1c mformatwn on germplasm and breedmg !mes accumulated over the years Such umque sets of data are becommg key to gene d1scovery when mtegrated With CIAT molecular markers work Due to h1stonc reasons severa! of the data taken on beans cassava and forages are not complete! y depos1ted m structured databases that can be qUJckly quened The only viable solut10n to addressed th1s 1ssue 1s to have management 1mposed on the researcher a stnct deadhnes to mcorporate the data As part of the AgroSalud -CIDA bwfortificatwn proJect for LA the bean and nce team members will mercase their activiiies that mclude breedmg and marker assisted selectwn for key genes related to Iron and zmc The team Will also mteract With the partners of AgroSalud at CIP CIMMYT CLAYUCA and EMBRAPA to develop a diet based strategies for deployment of bwfortified crops The project wiii mteract With HarvestPlus and wiii demonstrate the capacity of CIA T to lead a project that can be considered as an example of collectlve action between CG and NARS mstitutwns AbiOtlc stress Generation Challenge Program Team members wiii Implement the three proJects (two Cassava and one on nce) funded by the Generation Challenge Program as part of the competi!lve grant system The team members will al so expand the work on gene discovery for drought as part of collaboratwn between the molecular bwlogy sectlon and severa! collaborator m ARI and NARS Bwsafet) SB 2 staff will be submittmg to the World Bank GEF a regional proJect to assisl Natwnal Programs m the techmcal Implementallon of the Cartagena protocol The World Bank had approved fund m 2005 lo prepare the proJect The countnes mvolved mclude Colombia Brazii Peru Mexico and Costa Rica In addllwn SB 2 staff wiii contmue their support to NARS by conductwn capacity bmldmg workshop Charactenzation ofw1ld relatJVes of crops m Central Amenca and Colombia The World Bank has approved funds for CIAT and IICA to develop a propasa! the Conservatwn and Sustamable Use of Neotropical Nallve Crops and Wild Relallves of Crops ProJect Team member wiii be prepanng the full propasa! m 2006 for submiSsion to the GEF The project Will mvolve among others the mam bwd¡verslly msiitutes m Central Amen ca and Colombia, the Museum of Natural h1story of the Smithsoman and severa! other research mstnutwns from the US Mex1co Central Amenca and Colombia • How can lhe poor benefit from the growmg markets for h1gh value agncultural products? October 3 5 2005 (37 partlc1pants) • USAID -Breedmg staple crops for 1mproved m1cronutnent value 400 000 uso (2002 2004) • Ecofondo -ManeJo del germoplasma local y aumento de la agrob1dod1vers1dad de fnJol y ma1z con vanedades bwfortlficadas para meJorar la nutncwn en comurudades rurales del departamento de Nanno -FIDAR w1th CIAT-• Fontagro -MeJoramiento de la nutncwn humana en comumdades pobres de Amenca Latma utilizando mmz (QPM) y mjol comun bwfort1ficados con m1cronutnentes• BwCassava Plus a proJect to develop new cassava cultlvars w1th 1mproved nutnuonal status for sub Saharan Afnca Gales Foundatwn US$260 000 for 5 years ","tokenCount":"3814"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1611764747.json b/data/part_2/1611764747.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e284dae17645c36f309c93098a17abf84406db9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1611764747.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"7152709c0fdce81ad8a0d5ce509b091b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/144aed5a-19d4-4b79-a819-e333c0e16aca/retrieve","id":"1864767515"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"afb53b33-19cf-414d-bd69-719203c12190","pagecount":"18","content":"El surgimiento de prolongados períodos de sequía, dada la irregularidad con que se mueven en los últimos años parámetros como la precipitación y la temperatura, ha afectado severamente a los productores de la zona norte de Nicaragua, y es más grave aún para los que se ubican dentro del Corredor Seco de Centroamérica, que se caracterizan por depender económicamente de la agricultura y por lo general integran familias muy pobres, por lo que están menos preparados para enfrentar una sequía extrema. La zona seca de Nicaragua cubre 23 de los 153 municipios del país y comprende los departamentos de León y Chinandega, al occidente; Estelí, Madriz, Matagalpa y Nueva Segovia, al norte; además de Boaco en la zona central (El Nuevo Diario, 2014).Según estadísticas del Instituto Nicaragüense de Estudios Territoriales (INETER), el Corredor Seco de Nicaragua se caracteriza por las pocas precipitaciones: la precipitación media anual oscila entre los rangos de 650 a 800 mm, concentrados en el período de invierno -que es de seis meses-, lo que provoca la escasez de este vital líquido en el período de verano; esta cantidad de agua proveniente de las lluvias se consideraría suficiente para uso en la producción agrícola y pecuaria, si hubiera la manera de retenerla, lo cual no estaba ocurriendo.Por otro lado, el despale indiscriminado, característico de la zona, ha provocado el incremento de la velocidad de las escorrentías (o corrientes) superficiales de agua de lluvia, que resulta en muy poca retención de humedad en el suelo y trae como consecuencia negativa adicional la erosión de los mismos. Estas altas velocidades de las escorrentías provoca la inexistencia de fuentes de agua superficiales, tales como ríos, lagos y quebradas, por lo que los productores dependen, en su gran mayoría, de las precipitaciones del período de invierno.El 25 de julio de 2014, el Nuevo Diario publicó lo siguiente: \"«Ya van más de 2.500 reses (muertas), es una situación difícil, sobre todo en la franja seca (de Nicaragua) porque los alimentos están escasos», dijo al Canal 2 de televisión local el presidente de Conagan, René Blandón\".Por su parte, Acción Contra el Hambre (2010) afirmó en su informe de seguimiento denominado Impacto de la Sequía en el Corredor Seco de Nicaragua, que: \"En todas las comunidades visitadas se recogió una misma pauta sobre las pérdidas en el ciclo de postrera: las pérdidas varían de acuerdo al cultivo (maíz, sorgo o frijol) y a la altura del terreno, pero éstas han sido mayores al 50% en casi todos los casos, lo que ha generado un fuerte impacto negativo a la economía de los hogares\".• 226.523 metros cúbicos de agua captados en invierno para ser utilizados en verano.• 45 pilas de captación de aguas desde manantiales establecidas.• 112 pozos excavados a mano.• 62 reservorios construidos en finca.• 16 lagunetas establecidas.• 354.953 dólares invertidos en este tipo de infraestructuras.Ejemplos como estos muestran que la seguridad hídrica es esencial para la resiliencia al clima, y que por lo tanto, es necesaria la inversión en obras de captación de agua, para que los productores puedan contar con una reserva que les permita complementar el abastecimiento durante esas intermitencias que se producen -e inclusive en el período de invierno-, y evitar así la pérdida de los cultivos. Este tipo de obras son implementadas para la producción agrícola, el consumo animal y el riego de pastos, e incluyen la construcción de reservorios, lagunetas, pilas para captación de agua desde manantiales y pozos excavados a mano. Este programa atendió a 4.700 pequeños y medianos productores agropecuarios en cuatro departamentos del norte de Nicaragua (Matagalpa, Jinotega, Madriz y Nueva Segovia) con el propósito de mejorar sus medios de vida, aumentar la productividad y expandir el comercio de sus productos. Las cadenas que apoyó fueron hortalizas y frutales, frijol y ganado de doble propósito (producción de carne y leche).Uno de los objetivos de PROGRESA era incrementar la producción agrícola y pecuaria, y una de las formas de contribuir al incremento de esa producción era mediante el aumento de la disponibilidad de agua, especialmente para los períodos secos. Por eso, parte del apoyo que este proyecto brindó a las familias productoras beneficiarias, mediante el programa rural de agua, fueron obras de pequeña infraestructura rural que permitieron mejorar la productividad agropecuaria mediante la implementación de Buenas Prácticas Agrícolas (BPA) y Buenas Prácticas Pecuarias (BPP). Así mismo, PROGRESA mejoró el abastecimiento de agua para el consumo humano mediante miniacueductos rurales, aunque este documento tiene como propósito compartir la experiencia de construcción de tres tipos de obras de captación de agua para su uso en la producción: obras para la cosecha de agua (lagunetas y reservorios), pozos excavados a mano y pilas de captación de agua desde manantiales.En el mes de junio de 2013 se realizó el estudio de la línea de base para el Proyecto PROGRESA, a una muestra de 576 unidades productivas; este estudio permitió conocer la situación inicial de los productores, para lo cual se utilizó la metodología de los Cinco Capitales . Del análisis de los resultados de este estudio se lograron identificar las principales necesidades de los productores; entre ellas, la de infraestructura para almacenamiento de agua (solamente el 13.02% de la muestra contaba con esta infraestructura), lo cual fue determinante para destinar recursos del proyecto a la construcción de obras de almacenamiento y explotación de agua para la producción, con el propósito de hacer menos vulnerable a los productores del Corredor Seco ante una eventual sequía como las que se venían presentando.Antes de iniciar el proyecto se observaron fincas en las cuales había problemas de producción agropecuaria (bajos rendimientos agrícolas y bajos índices productivos y reproductivos en ganado mayor). Como consecuencia de las sequías se habían producido grandes pérdidas en cultivos y la muerte del ganado, que se traducían en la disminución de ingresos y el incremento de la pobreza, puesto que los productores no lograban generar alimentos para el consumo propio ni para la venta en los mercados. Era muy frecuente encontrar a productores que comenzaban el ciclo agrícola con el uso de sistemas de riego, pero cuyas fuentes de agua se les agotaban antes de concluir el ciclo de los cultivos; y en consecuencia, perdían todo lo invertido, debido a que no contaban con obras de almacenamiento de agua ni recursos económicos para desarrollarlas.A esta situación se sumaba la falta de interés del sector privado para financiar la implementación de este tipo de obras, lo que imposibilitaba el establecimiento de alianzas con este sector. Y la situación se agravaba aún más debido a los insuficientes recursos disponibles a través de los organismos no gubernamentales y el gobierno en general, para atender la creciente demanda de estas obras (a pesar de que se han asignado recursos para enfrentar las adversidades en este contexto).Se ejecutaron tres tipos de obras de captación de agua para la producción: las de cosecha de agua (lagunetas y reservorios), las pilas para captación de agua desde manantiales y los pozos excavados a mano.La asistencia técnica para la construcción de estas obras fue fundamental para su éxito. Lograr la eficiencia de los recursos fue una función de la asistencia técnica, que se apoyó en la supervisión permanente y el control de la obra construida, con ayuda del productor beneficiario directo.El proceso de implementación de las obras inició con un plan de capacitación impartido por los técnicos de las organizaciones socias y los asesores de CRS, que estuvo dirigido a los productores para desarrollar capacidades en el uso y mantenimiento de las obras y los equipos. En estas capacitaciones se trabajó el concepto de gestión de los recursos hídricos, cuya aplicación se hizo mediante la realización de un inventario, por cada comunidad, de los recursos hídricos disponibles para enfrentar la crisis, lo que contribuyó a que los productores pudieran determinar la capacidad local para mantener animales y cultivos.Además de la gestión de recursos hídricos, otro de los principales temas impartidos fue el relacionado con los requerimientos hídricos de los cultivos más empleados por los productores. Esto permitió estimar, en cada caso, el aprovechamiento que cada productor le podía dar a las obras durante el período seco, según sus áreas de cultivo o número de animales (ver ejemplos en la Tabla 1). Durante el proceso de implementación también se involucraron actores locales, entre los que se encontraban las alcaldías de cada municipio donde intervino PROGRESA, y el Ministerio de Recursos Naturales y del Ambiente (MARENA), además de los productores como beneficiarios directos. Este proceso inició entre febrero y abril del año 2013, con una presentación por parte de los equipos técnicos de los socios de PROGRESA, ante los consejos municipales de cada alcaldía, en la que se les dieron a conocer cada uno de los componentes, objetivos y alcances del proyecto. Además, en estas presentaciones se destacaron los beneficios que se esperaban obtener respecto al incremento de la producción y sus impactos en el mejoramiento de la calidad de vida de las familias; así como la importancia de las obras de captación de agua para la producción.Por su parte, el MARENA también apoyó en el proceso de selección de sitios para la construcción de obras de cosecha de agua; sus técnicos especialistas acompañaron a equipos técnicos de PROGRESA, ofreciendo sus habilidades y conocimientos para optimizar la selección de los sitios; principalmente de aquellos cercanos a las áreas protegidas o reservas, conocidas también como zonas de amortiguamiento, dado que en estos casos se corre mayor riesgo de provocar daños ambientales si el sitio no es seleccionado adecuadamente.La cosecha de agua es una tecnología mediante la cual se recolecta el agua proveniente de la escorrentía (o corriente) superficial de la lluvia para su uso productivo. La ejecución de obras de este tipo requiere el movimiento de tierra, con el uso de maquinaria pesada (tractores), para formar un vaso de tierra o pared (laguneta o reservorio, según su dimensión), cuyos muros están compuestos por material arcilloso o limoso (materiales finos e impermeables que evitan la infiltración) para retener la lluvia. Los reservorios son obras cuya inversión no supera los 1.200 dólares, mientras que las lagunetas son obras de mayor tamaño y capacidad, con costos de inversión mayores a los 5.000 dólares. Estas obras pueden ser aprovechadas para el uso agrícola (cultivos), para el consumo animal o para el riego de pastos para ganado.Como se mencionó anteriormente, se realizó un cuidadoso análisis para la selección de los sitios donde se construirían las obras, lo cual fue una actividad fundamental y decisiva para asegurar el éxito de la tecnología. Los siguientes son los parámetros más importantes que se tuvieron en cuenta para la selección:• Se buscaron zonas altas para represar el agua, de manera que se evitara el uso de bombeo eléctrico o combustible para llevar el agua hasta las áreas de siembra o destino final, lo que permitió disminuir los costos de producción.• Se priorizaron los sitios con topografía favorable, es decir, aquellos donde el terreno de manera natural presentaba la forma de un vaso (con paredes naturales en los laterales), para el almacenamiento de agua en cantidades suficientes que justificaran la inversión. La pendiente óptima del terreno natural debía estar entre el 2 y el 8%.• Se observó en cada caso el área de recarga hídrica, el volumen de precipitaciones y la evaporación (a una temperatura promedio de la zona de 25 a 30 º C se estima que se puede evaporar hasta un 30% del volumen de agua almacenado), ya que de estas variables dependía la cantidad de agua que se calculaba que podía llegar hasta el área destinada para el almacenamiento.• Se consideró también la textura del suelo, que es muy importante para la retención de agua; por ejemplo, en suelos arenosos o pedregosos hay mucha infiltración, lo que no asegura la retención de agua por mucho tiempo; en cambio en los suelos arcillosos o limosos (con granos de suelo muy finos) la retención es mayor, por lo que son ideales para este tipo de obras. Sin embargo, en algunos casos muy críticos se tuvo que utilizar geomembrana (material compuesto de plástico especial que no permite el paso del agua y que encima del suelo servía como impermeabilizante para evitar la fuga o infiltración del agua al subsuelo), pero poco a poco se fue descartando, debido a su alto costo 2 , que limitaba llevar el beneficio a un mayor número de productores (y no todos ellos estaban en la capacidad de asumir la contraparte, un tema que se abordará más adelante).• Para evitar exponer a las personas, y a las infraestructuras, a posibles colapsos de los reservorios por eventos naturales tales como huracanes, sismos, etc., se buscó que los reservorios quedaran ubicados en zonas alejadas de las viviendas, escuelas y tendidos eléctricos, entre otros.• Se evitaron sitios con mantos rocosos de afloramiento superficial, porque esto generalmente limita la profundidad del reservorio y, en consecuencia, representa un menor volumen de almacenamiento.• Se valoró además la finalidad del reservorio o laguneta (si tenía fines agrícolas o de consumo animal). La prioridad se dio a aquellos sitios donde existía un mayor potencial tanto en áreas cultivables como en ganadería.• Los sitios ideales debían evitar el corte de árboles para ser consecuentes con la política de CRS, sus socios y el proyecto en general, de no permitir el daño medioambiental; para soportar esto se elaboró una ficha de perfil y medio ambiental donde se identificaban los posibles daños durante cada una de las etapas del proceso de implementación (selección de sitio, diseño, construcción y operación, y mantenimiento) y las medidas de mitigación necesarias en cada caso, a las cuales se les dio seguimiento para asegurar su cumplimiento.• Si se trataba de zonas de amortiguamiento, las construcciones requerían una valoración especial del MARENA; sin su aprobación no se podían ejecutar las obras.• Otro aspecto que se tuvo en cuenta en el proceso de implementación fue que los beneficiarios de las lagunetas o reservorios se encontraran lo más cerca posible entre ellos. Esto ofrecía una ventaja adicional en cuanto a costos, ya que según las distancias de movilización de la maquinaria, el proveedor del servicio podía presentar ofertas más favorables para el proyecto.• Una vez seleccionado el sitio se recomendó la realización de calicatas (excavaciones en la tierra de un metro de largo, un metro de ancho y un metro de profundidad, para obtener un metro cúbico), con el propósito de determinar la textura de los estratos, el tipo de material encontrado, su profundidad y la velocidad de infiltración. Esta excavación se llenaba con agua para observar la velocidad con la que descendía; aquellos sitios donde el agua se consumía de inmediato o se infiltraba en poco tiempo (por ejemplo, en el transcurso de un día), eran descartados.En el caso de los reservorios se procuraba un volumen de almacenamiento aproximado de 1.000 metros cúbicos por cada uno; en el caso de las lagunetas se procuraba obtener un volumen de almacenamiento de 5.000 metros cúbicos, aproximadamente, por cada una. Sin embargo, una limitante fue encontrar, en el momento oportuno, al contratista ejecutor: se requería que el dueño de la maquinaria estuviera trabajando en la zona donde se construiría la obra, para disminuir los costos, y que además fuera período de verano, ya que una vez iniciado el invierno este tipo de obras son casi imposibles de ejecutar, debido al alto grado de saturación de suelos (por el exceso de humedad) que hace difícil la operación de la maquinaria.Una vez finalizadas las obras se le recomendaba al productor cercar el área del espejo de agua con alambre de púas y cercas vivas (postes de árboles de diferentes especies que tienen la capacidad de echar raíces con facilidad y son de rápido crecimiento), con el objetivo de reducir la posibilidad de contaminación microbiológica (con excremento u orina de animales).Otro tipo de protección que se recomendó fue la estabilización de los taludes de las paredes del reservorio, para evitar su derrumbe mediante la siembra de grama, que ayuda a amarrar el suelo y evita su destrucción con el exceso de agua retenida o de lluvia.Para ampliar el número de productores beneficiarios, PROGRESA implementó la política de que a cada persona que recibía este tipo de obras le correspondía aportar como contraparte el 30% del costo del reservorio o la laguneta. Esta política tuvo una excelente aceptación, lo cual se evidenció con el alto número de productores que solicitaron ser beneficiados con una obra de estas características.El uso de geomembrana fue necesario en los suelos altamente permeables (suelos arenosos y gravosos), en los cuales la pérdida de agua almacenada por infiltración era muy alta o era casi imposible almacenar un volumen importante de este recurso.La implementación de esta tecnología fue aplicada a manera de pilotaje en la finca de la productora Aura del Socorro Fernández Guillén, de la comunidad de Casilí Abajo, en el municipio de Telpaneca, departamento de Madriz. El costo fue de US$2.833 y cubrió un área de 490 metros cuadrados. Su alto costo y el bajo volumen de almacenamiento (86 metros cúbicos) hicieron que esta tecnología no fuera la más apropiada.Una vez finalizada la construcción de cada obra, se esperó la llegada del periodo lluvioso (regularmente de mayo a octubre), durante el cual se almacenó agua para utilizar tanto en el período seco como en la misma época considerada de 'invierno', puesto que los inviernos de los últimos años algunas veces se agotan en un solo día, durante el cual cae toda la lluvia que antes se producía durante un mes.Para el caso de las obras con fines agrícolas, además de la preparación de suelos o parcelas para los diferentes cultivos, se requería de un sistema de riego, tanto por goteo 3 (en el cual se usa principalmente la fuerza de gravedad y no se requiere mucha presión) como por aspersión 4 (riego en forma de lluvia artificial que sí requiere presión para llevar el agua almacenada en el reservorio hasta el área de siembra). El costo aproximado de estas tecnologías fue de US$1.700/ha, en el caso del riego por goteo; y US$933/ha, en el caso del riego por aspersión.La instalación de estos sistemas fue ejecutada por el equipo técnico de los socios, con el apoyo de los productores, y supervisada por los asesores técnicos de CRS. Se elaboró además un programa de riego para cada caso, con base en el caudal de la fuente, las presiones requeridas, las distancias entre surcos y el tipo de cultivo, pues era necesario regular el flujo de agua (cantidad de horas de riego por día) de acuerdo con la demanda del cultivo. En este proceso se acompañó a los productores con planes de capacitación para el manejo eficiente de estos sistemas, su mantenimiento y la aplicación de fertilizantes.Esta tecnología es sencilla y consiste en la excavación a mano del subsuelo, utilizando herramientas básicas como picos, palas, piochas, barras, baldes, cuñas y mazos para romper mantos rocosos. Durante este proceso de excavación se implementaron medidas básicas de seguridad como el uso de casco protector, guantes, gafas para proteger los ojos y arneses para sacar a quien realizaba la excavación, en caso de emergencia; los accidentes más comunes, pero que se lograron evitar, son los derrumbes de material inestable o arenoso, que pueden dejar pérdidas lamentables.Por eso también se usaron ademes (madera que se coloca para sostener las paredes de la excavación y evitar derrumbes).La profundidad de excavación de los pozos varió de acuerdo con el destino del agua, la profundidad del manto acuífero y los costos. Por ejemplo, la profundidad de los pozos para riego agrícola no excedía los 10 metros, mientras que los pozos para el consumo de agua del ganado podían llegar hasta los 25 metros de profundidad. Una vez se encontraba el acuífero y este producía un caudal suficiente para su explotación, se procedía a proteger las paredes de forma definitiva utilizando ladrillos de barro o piedra bolón (canto extraído de ríos o quebradas), los cuales se pegaban con mortero (mezcla de arena y cemento en proporciones 1:6; es decir, 1 parte de cemento x 6 de arena).Los diámetros de excavación variaban entre 1,5 y 3 metros, dependiendo el tope de contrapartida que podía aportar el productor (entre mayor era el diámetro y la profundidad del pozo, mayor cantidad de materiales se requerían para su revestimiento). Uno de los aspectos de diseño que se recomendó fue que los pozos tuvieran un brocal (pared que sobresale de la superficie del terreno natural) para evitar accidentes, y que fueran debidamente tapados para evitar la contaminación en su interior.Para la explotación del pozo generalmente se hizo necesario el apoyo de un equipo de bombeo, cuya capacidad dependía del caudal y de la distancia de las áreas de riego 5 . Para distancias cortas y superficies planas se utilizaron bombas de caudal, mientras que para distancias largas y donde se tenían que vencer grandes pendientes, se utilizaron bombas de presión.6 Un caudal se consideraba aprovechable cuando tuviera la capacidad de abastecer una pila de 16 metros cúbicos, que generalmente se llena por las noches para su posterior uso en el riego de cultivos (mínimo de 0,36 ha).Para la implementación de estas obras lo más importante fue identificar a productores que tenían en sus propiedades manantiales con un caudal aprovechable 6 para el uso en labores agrícolas. La obra consistía en una represa construida alrededor del manantial, cuyas paredes (hechas de ladrillos de barro, estructuras de hierro y concreto) tenían dimensiones no mayores a 4 metros de longitud y 1,5 metros de altura, de los cuales medio metro va enterrado en forma de diente en el terreno natural y 1 metro va por encima de la superficie del terreno. El agua es conducida del manantial a la pila por medio de mangueras de polietileno de una pulgada de diámetro. Luego, es llevada hasta el área de cultivo por medio de mangueras del mismo material, que varían de 1 a 1,5 pulgadas, según el sistema de riego y el tipo de cultivo.Un evento extraordinario que se presentó durante el proceso de implementación del proyecto fue una sequía severa -que tuvo lugar en los meses de mayo, junio y julio del ciclo agrícola del año 2014-, la cual afectó dos departamentos (Madriz y Nueva Segovia) de los cuatro atendidos por PROGRESA. Ante este panorama, se realizó un diagnóstico con el apoyo de los equipos técnicos de las 8 organizaciones socias del proyecto y los resultados fueron dramáticos.Se observó la disminución de los mantos freáticos (agua subterránea) de los pozos que se usaban para riego, algunos ríos y quebradas se secaron y/o disminuyeron su caudal, también hubo afectación de la producción de carne y leche y los índices reproductivos, mayor estrés calórico (alteraciones del bienestar animal por exceso de calor), abortos florales (los cultivos botan las flores y esto afecta la producción), pérdida total de cultivos, disminución de áreas de siembra, descapitalización de las fincas (venta de ganado a bajo precio), reducción de la producción de biomasa, bajos ingresos, plagas en pasturas y cultivos, migración de personas y ganado, y altos costos en la adquisición de suplementos de alimentación.Todas estas condiciones adversas se reflejaron en pérdidas lamentables de importantes áreas de cultivos de granos básicos como el maíz (640 hectáreas) y el frijol (638 hectáreas), así como pérdidas de áreas de pastos para ganado (41 hectáreas), lo que afectó la canasta básica y el bienestar de las familias de los productores, quienes también se quedaron sin recursos económicos para la adquisición de semillas e insumos para la siembra en época de postrera. Además, los animales se adelgazaron y fallecieron 1.119 por falta de forrajes. Esto vino a ratificar lo vulnerables que son los productores atendidos ante el tema de la sequía.El programa de agua constituyó una respuesta de PROGRESA al contexto en el cual se implementó y fue una importante medida que contrarrestó los efectos del cambio y la variabilidad climáticos en el área de intervención. Mediante las 235 obras construidas se aumentó la resiliencia de igual número de familias (1.092 personas beneficiadas en total) para hacer frente a eventuales sequías que podrían traer consigo, como ocurrió en el pasado, menores rendimientos en la producción de leche y carne, abortos florales, pérdida de los cultivos, disminución de áreas de siembra, muerte del ganado, descapitalización de las fincas, plagas, entre otros efectos adversos que terminan afectando directamente los ingresos de los productores.Estas obras fueron de mucha utilidad para mantener la suficiente humedad en el suelo y evitar la pérdida de los cultivos. En cuanto a áreas cultivadas, en el caso de frutas y vegetales el total del área cultivada fue de 873 ha; de ellas, 445,23 (el 51%) fueron producidas con el uso de sistemas de riego y 427,77 ha (el 49%) se produjeron bajo sistemas tradicionales.Es importante mencionar que las alcaldías constituyeron un fuerte aliado para el proyecto. En muchos de los casos, con el apoyo de ellas, se logró la ejecución de importantes obras complementarias, tales como el mejoramiento de las vías de acceso a los sitios donde se construyeron las obras, mejorando así las condiciones para sacar la producción al mercado.Una de las lecciones aprendidas tiene que ver con la necesidad de establecer alianzas con los distintos actores que se involucraron y que deben participar al ejecutar este tipo de obras. El primer actor es el beneficiario, ya que sin él, el proyecto no tiene razón de ser; sus aportes económicos (30% del valor de las obras) sirvieron como un importante complemento que permitió que se hicieran más obras que las planificadas y se lograra mayor cobertura en cuanto al número de beneficiarios.Por otro lado, las alcaldías y el MARENA jugaron un papel fundamental, pues no solo contribuyeron en la identificación de los sitios ideales para la implementación de las obras, y las aprobaron en su calidad de autoridades, sino que además en algunos casos se involucraron con aportes importantes, tales como plantas para la reforestación en las áreas de recarga hídrica (la alcaldía de La Concordia en Jinotega, por ejemplo, aportó más de 1.000 plantas para este propósito).Por otra parte, la disponibilidad de recursos financieros incide directamente en el tamaño de las obras, y además se deben tomar en cuenta los diferentes parámetros del entorno, tales como el clima, las condiciones de suelo, la topografía y el conocimiento de los lugareños, para obtener obras funcionales y minimizar los riesgos de colapsos que provoquen severos daños a la infraestructura y exijan invertir más recursos, como sucedió con un reservorio en el departamento de Nueva Segovia.En dicho caso, la obra se construyó en la propiedad del productor Ezequiel Rodríguez, ubicado en la comunidad de El Zapote, que se caracteriza por sequías severas; razón por la cual se consideró suficiente un vertedero (canal para evacuar el exceso de agua) pequeño, con una extensión de 1,5 metros de largo por 0,50 metros de ancho. Sin embargo, debido a la imprevisibilidad de las lluvias (lo que incluye aguaceros torrenciales), el vertedero colapsó durante el primer invierno de prueba y se tuvieron que implementar medidas correctivas que representaron mayores costos. Por lo tanto, los diseños deben prever estas situaciones, lo que implica destinar un mayor presupuesto para construir las obras con dimensiones acordes a las nuevas condiciones climáticas, o reducir el número total de obras, si los recursos son limitados.Otra lección aprendida como factor de éxito tiene que ver con el intercambio de experiencias y aprendizajes para fortalecer capacidades tanto en los productores como en las cooperativas y el personal técnico de los socios. El plan de capacitación que se implementó para conocer de cerca las tecnologías de captación de agua y que incluyó visitas a obras similares (especialmente de cosecha de agua, que son en alguna medida las más novedosas), enriqueció los conocimientos del personal involucrado (técnicos, asesores y productores) con aspectos que se debían repetir, como el correcto procedimiento técnico para la construcción de las obras.En cuanto a factores de riesgo para tener en cuenta dentro de futuras experiencias, algunas obras presentaron retraso en su ejecución debido a que no se aprovechó al máximo el período seco para construir. En el caso de las lagunetas y reservorios, se hace imposible operar con la maquinaria pesada requerida durante el período de lluvias, ya que los suelos se saturan de agua y dificultan la maniobrabilidad de la misma; además del riesgo que existe de destrucción o deterioro de la obra ya iniciada por efecto de las escorrentías.Por otra parte, hay mayor riesgo de obtener datos errados durante las épocas de lluvia en cuanto a la profundidad del manto freático (nivel del agua subterránea encontrada en la excavación) y el caudal; es normal que los niveles de agua subterránea suban en invierno y se encuentren a pocas profundidades, mientras que en época seca el nivel de agua baja y se encuentra a mayor profundidad; por lo que si el pozo fue excavado a poca profundidad, el agua ya no está disponible cuando más se necesita. Por lo tanto, estas obras deben construirse en el periodo seco para poder almacenar en invierno y empezar a hacer uso de ellas en el siguiente verano.","tokenCount":"4831"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1613632889.json b/data/part_2/1613632889.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9532a93bfa0812ae315f9f459148355bcff0f28c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1613632889.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"20cf748859dee6d0cc21caab807e6846","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/9be88be8-9754-4a88-a49c-ac4d913ab01a/retrieve","id":"202280573"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"a1672ded-0589-4c42-bfe7-15f284336338","pagecount":"10","content":"The proposed program targets both the availability and affordability of sources of animal 1 protein for the poor while also promoting greater participation by the poor in animal and fish production. The proposal clearly defines key constraints and opportunities for small-scale livestock and fish production systems in the developing world, which if alleviated, would make significant contributions to the CGIAR's SLOs of improved health and nutrition and poverty reduction. The proposal presents a good assessment of causes of failure of previous attempts to increase productivity and livelihood opportunities of small scale livestock and fish farmers in developing countries and clearly identifies opportunities for sensible investments in research and generation of science-based knowledge in this sector. It adopts a value chain approach to provide research for the development of a discrete set of prioritised value chains for animal products in selected countries. This approach was unanimously supported by the external reviewers who felt it has the potential to deliver impact.The first component on technology development, which takes a significant proportion of the budget, includes a strong element of upstream research as well as development of technologies to feed into the value chain development of the second component. The third component is cross-cutting, focusing on priority setting, gender and equity, and impact. The ‗whole', provides a coherent packaged approach that avoids the impression of business -as usual‖. The ISPC believes the approach -through analysis of value chains in areas of poverty -should lead to impact, through offering entry points for research that address social, economic and technical problems of subcomponents of the value chain. Selection and targeting of promising value chains has been included in the proposal, with appropriate attention to the specific needs of women farmers, women active in the value chain, and women consumers. The choice of value chains and research issues has been made through regional stakeholder discussions and other priority setting studies. The result is a focus on 5 system-specific value chains, spread across 10 countries. The ISPC commends this approach as well as the CRP's proposal of a competitive grants scheme to select partners.The ISPC does have some concerns with the approach, however, mainly in relation to delivery of relevant international public goods (IPGs). Two of the major issues posed by livestock, namely their multi-functionality in the development context and the potential for adverse environmental impacts, appear to receive relatively little consideration in the proposal. In particular, the impact of livestock systems on water and soil resources is not given much attention with regard to: (i) trends towards more intensive livestock feeding operations (e.g. south and East Asia, and perhaps at some point in Sub-Saharan Africa), and (ii) the impact and sustainability of extensive pastoral systems in relation to water and soil resources. While the intensification issues would best be covered in CRP3.7, there are research components on the environmental impact of livestock systems distributed across CRP1.1 Drylands, CRP1.3 Aquatic Agricultural systems; CRP6 Forestry, and CRP5 Water, Land, Ecosystems. There are clearly needs and opportunities to bring cohesion and coordination to CGIAR efforts on these cross-cutting topics which are not dealt with in the proposal as currently presented.Communication and knowledge management is a strong element of CRP3.7, and if implemented as planned, could allow some of the downstream work to be transformed into regional public goods, through extensive knowledge sharing.The ISPC recommends that the proposal is accepted with some revisions. It is a strong proposal with good integration of the natural and social sciences, which gains credibility through focus on a limited number of value chains. This approach is promising in terms of delivery of local and regional impact, but creates risks in terms of delivering IPGs. Attention to the following also is advised: Revisions should strengthen the description of how risk of failure to deliver broader IPGs using the value chain approach can be addressed, particularly in the areas of multifunctionality of livestock and the impact of both fish and livestock production on the environment (including competition for human food and natural resources).  Despite the new approach, the budget still allocates two-fold more resources to technological research compared with value chain approaches. While genetic enhancement of farmed tilapia has yielded substantial benefits from previous research, there is considerably less evidence of good returns from research investment on livestock disease. The proposal should therefore identify why this overall balance of program resources is expected to deliver greater impact on the livestock side than the CGIAR's track record in technological research to date. In relation to the specific value chains selected, the ISPC suggests the following revisions: A better description of the added value from further research in the area of dairying in India, given the considerable research effort (and success) already achieved with that value chain.  Researchable constraints are weak and should be strengthened for efforts on sheep in Mali and dairying in Tanzania.  External reviewers and the ISPC question the appropriateness of including the value chain of pigs in Uganda.  The rationale for excluding poultry as a specific value chain for study was noted, but the low competitiveness of poultry production in meeting increasing demand in Sub-Saharan Africa (as evidenced by imports) may justify re-evaluation of this decision in the future. The ISPC suggests consideration be given to using the Asian poultry value chain as a benchmark because of increasing importance of eggs and chicken in diets of many poor people.  Mention is made of evaluation of research progress, but nothing about how these evaluations will be used. While fundamentals of the -livestock revolution‖ seem robust, the data should be constantly reviewed and updated. Inclination of emerging value chains towards large scale producers, elite capture or swings in market demand could rapidly change the expected benefits to small holders in several of these commodity systems. It could be useful to be clear with partners and funders from the start that lack of progress or a change in external context away from the original selection criteria might alter the emphasis on specific value chains. An outline of how the evaluation process will lead to program modifications would be beneficial. While approving the simplicity of the three themes in CRP3.7, the ISPC has some concerns about the descriptions and suggest the following: The past livestock disease agenda be reviewed (and hence lessons learnt) to highlight which parts of the more basic research agenda have delivered impact and how. This should inform the basis for structuring longer-term research and prioritizing how the program will conduct disease research relevant to more immediate value chain requirements.  The ISPC also suggests re-consideration of the priorities for forages and feed research in order to focus on those most applicable to the value chains.Although the program proposal is not yet completely developed, value chain innovation is a participative on-going process and requires actions based on the needs of actors in the value chains.The approach described and the expertise of the four cooperating CGIAR partners provides confidence that a more mature and unified work plan can lead to positive outcomes for learning and sharing worldwide.This is a well written proposal and should be commended for its relative brevitythe key sections totalling just over 100 pages. This Program focuses on a few animal source food value chains, which have been carefully chosen (with stakeholder consultation) according to relevant criteria. The rationale for targeting a small number of value chains, and the specific relationship between country-level work and the production of global public goods are well-argued, with possible objections being anticipated and transparently discussed. For instance, the inclusion of multiple countries and regions, together with some common animal species, is anticipated to allow comparisons, cross-system learning and extrapolation of results beyond the target countries and regionsThe two main innovations and changes from past research efforts are the clustering of livestock (meat and milk) and fish under one program and focusing more on the whole value chain, not just increasing production per se. Both innovations are excellent and should provide a sound framework for future work. However, the document reflects some of the difficulties in the transition to this new alignment.It reads more as an -arranged marriage‖ rather than a -marriage of choice‖. For example, large parts of the text focus on farms and livestock value chains with no mention of fish until much later in the narrative (see Pages 55 to 60). It will obviously take time for the synergies to develop and these teething problems are probably indications of the large change in the CGIAR approach rather than any on-going future difficulties. Livestock and fish production from aquaculture value chains have many features in common and make a much more logical cluster than the normal fisheries and aquaculture approaches adopted by many Ministries and research institutes.In general the five value chains and target countries have been carefully chosen, according to transparent criteria. The ISPC respect the consultations that have taken place to inform the choice, but would like to receive further rationale about the prioritisation of dairy in India, since this value chain has been so widely studied and has already achieved wide success. Further explanation as to why this new work is expected to add significant value is needed. Similarly, the proposal omits poultry, the fastest growing value chain. The reasons given are noted, but there are significant issues of the competitiveness of commercial poultry in Africa that might been addressed. Even if poultry is to be excluded from CRP3.7 as a target value chain, it might be interesting to use poultry value chains as a benchmark. For two of the value chains reviewed, Sheep in Mali and Dairy in Tanzania, very few researchable constraints are identified, and it is not clearly demonstrated that these value chains would produce significant global public research goods, or represent good value for money. In addition, the Uganda pig meat value chain raises the fundamental question of whether there are sufficient incentives to upgrade what is currently a very low input system. Description of the selected fisheries value chain, makes mention of other value-chain analyses (e.g. USAID Lead (2010)) but little is said about their results or implications for the CRP.In general, the focus on informal value chains tends to provide a pro-poor approach for both the producer and consumer communities. In many cases, better linkages of these informal chains with formal value chains would improve overall efficiency and product quality. The ISPC suggests that the scope of the work cannot address the informal chains without looking at the wider sector in which they operate.The multifunctionality of livestock and its asset value is presented. Nevertheless little follow up is provided in the value chain presentations which appear solely production-and not risk-oriented. Poor women especially will tend to rethink the propositions to commercialise when there is no insurance against failure.The proposal is also disappointing at a strategic level in relation to the extent of coverage of livestock interactions with the environment/natural resources, given the global interest generated by Livestock's Long Shadow. Objective 5 on protection of the natural resource base is not adequately reflected in descriptions of the eight value chains. There was relatively little reference either to the impacts (positive and negative) of manure or the effect of the value chains on ecosystem services such as clean water. The proposal does mention that environmental issues could be addressed with additional funding, but it is surprising that these are not part of the core proposal or linked to research on related topics in other CRPs. This degree of focus runs the risk, therefore, of underplaying delivery of global public goods, a point recognised by the proponents, who have taken some actions -such as selecting 2 sites per value chain to cross reference research findings. It is difficult to see where else in the systemwide CRP portfolio issues such as trends in global markets for livestock products and the overall impact of livestock on the environment might be addressed. Because the proposed research focuses on local case studies, there is danger of missing the bigger picture of how these trends extrapolate to global impact. In fact, local effects may be misleading without linkage to a larger global context.There is also risk that economic changes may alter the relevance of some of the value chains selected, relative to the selection criteria, given that markets for animal protein are dynamic. There is a referenced assumption (p1) that smallholder producers will continue to compete strongly, but that reference is five years old and should be regularly challenged as markets respond. Awareness of global as well as local trends and awareness of emerging trends in larger-scale intensive production will be needed. Evaluation of whether the approach adopted is posing a risk is mentioned by the proponents, but there is little detail on what actions will be taken if small holder production systems become disadvantaged as markets evolve.Overall the natural and social sciences are well integrated. The goal of the program, and the description of the whole in testing a clear hypothesis, is compelling. The choice of research themes is coherent in pursuit of the goal, though the question could be asked (given the management structures proposed) as to why the 3 components of the Technology Development theme are not themes in their own right? The value chain approach is innovative and the choice of value chains provides a tight focus, provided the issue of the IPGs of environmental impact and multifunctionality are addressed.The strong emphasis on the development aspects and the track record of the participating Centers with development projects and the private sector gives confidence in delivery of impact. However, the strong budgetary emphasis on development of upstream technologies needs further justification. The prioritizing of value chains and the commodities to be considered was carried out using appropriate criteria, although attention has already been drawn to the need to revisit these during the 10 year duration of the program. Expectations of impact are conservative, but dependent on scaling out efforts.Communication and its quality i.e. disentangling the local characteristics from the generic public good lessons of the value chains, will be decisive. Comparative studies should assist to get the public good results identified.In the more detailed descriptions in Part 4 for each value chain, the CRP has provided detailed tables of research issues, the potential partners for the research, and outcome for each step in the value chain and address the overall potential for impact for each value chain. Some have set targets in terms of outcomes and impacts while others have not; some have provided simple pathways for impact while others have not; and some have provided indicators for monitoring and evaluation. More consistency in the analysis of impact would improve the Proposal. Thus it is difficult to conclude whether the estimated benefits are plausible. Trade-off analysis is not very prominent in the proposal but is needed to understand risk mitigation and the potential loss or gain of livestock assets when multifunctionality is lost through commercialisation. More emphasis is needed on environment. Frequently waste i.e. manure management is mentioned. Manure represents a valuable resource for soil fertility and may become competitive with high fertilizer prices. Labour has been problematic and technologies to solve this problem in manure collecting, processing and application would be useful but are not offered in the program. Intensification may have positive effects on GHG emissions from ruminants at higher production levels. All together environmental impact should be addressed in the whole value chains: productivity side by side with eco-efficiency. The program does not mention losses in the value chain in informal markets. These can be high, so a first approach could be to identify losses of product and by-products and solutions to gain efficiency overall. Resilience of the value chains has not been mentioned in the program. Which characteristics will determine the adaptability of value chains to new contexts? One can imagine in the future the effects of climate change, but also price volatility, will require appropriate responses in value chains. Efficiency is not the only response to survival of the value chain. What measures will be used for innovation or adaptability?The plans for gender and poverty analysis are clear. This approach provides the program a unique basis for change that will yield new information applicable to both poor producers and consumers.Overall the proposal's structure and the past history of the CGIAR proponents provide reassurance about the potential quality of science, although this is difficult to judge directly in an unfinished proposal. Hypotheses are appropriate in relation to the needs chosen. The literature is up to date and includes a number of very recent publications.Half of the funding is allocated to the technology development theme, recognising the important CGIAR expertise in this area. The health component is well developed in terms of the science, though for livestock it appears more historically science-driven compared to the research on biosecurity and fish health which derives more directly from value chain analysis. For instance, for animal health, more attention might be expected on zoonoses and diseases of intensification. Even overuse and misuse of antibiotics (in feed) has to be addressed in some value chains. The overall impression then is that distinct approaches will be pursued for livestock, separate from fish health which may be appropriate to some extent, but does it miss some potential for synergy?In relation to the component on forages and feeds, the constraints to increasing livestock production have been known for decades and are well documented. A vast array of research information and technologies is also available, much of this developed by three of the Centers involved in the Program.For example, there are some 70,000 accessions in the CGIAR forage germplasm banks, and much is known about their adaptation to climatic, edaphic and biotic factors, their uses and management. An interactive pasture selection tool entitled Tropical Forages is already available on CD, developed by a team that included ILRI and CIAT scientists. Accordingly, agro-ecological zone evaluation of forage accessions should be kept to a minimum. Breeding programs with pasture grasses and legumes are not justified at this stage. The ISPC suggests that there is adequate genetic variation available in the forage germplasm banks that should be initially exploited. Although seed production by CGIAR Centers is necessary in the early stages of new forage cultivar development, this is ultimately a private sector activity. There are myriad crop by-products already locally available in small-scale farming systems, which are under-utilised, wasted or disregarded.The genetics component appears reasonably well integrated (at least as described) both between disciplines and between livestock and fish. Conservation of animal genetic resources requires a clear cut strategy as part of the breeding inputs. Private breeders (international companies) often are not interested, but public support is also problematic. Can researchers offer an attractive commercial deal for both conservation and application (crossbreeding or other use)?The CGIAR has to cooperate with partners that are knowledgeable in the areas of the value chain where the Centers have less experiencesuch as post-harvest losses and processing. The ISPC notes the recognition of the need for research on the trade-offs between feed and food. There was surprisingly little reference to ecosystems, given the interest in other CRPs.The program should be able to provide a multitude of diverse outputs for scientists, for development specialists etc. in line with the great ambition of developing value chains for diverse animal food products. Much depends on the willingness of participating scientists to invest in communication skills and become partners in the process. The balance of more technically-oriented versus social scientists has to be correct, based on a shared interdisciplinary challenge. Moreover communication with, frequently, uneducated woman farmers and consumers requires different skills. Reflective thinking and participative discussions require training. In the program many skills have to be available, not only in the top management, the PPMC, but at all levels in the development of the value chain.The success of a value chain may be dependent on strong farmer organisations for inputs and for better priced products. The conduct of platforms and fora (i.e. negotiation) with all stakeholders including farmer organisations of the value chain to set priorities is essential for analysis and publication. This is a new area and the Program, by comparison of processes and by innovation, can contribute to new outputs. The focus on woman and poor producers and consumers is even more challenging. There is some concern that Subtheme 2.3 (value chain innovation) goes too far downstream and hence risks slipping into direct development work (note for example the statements as -we find it increasingly critical to help developand often create-small business services to support emerging production & marketing systems. This approach will be central to value chain development efforts‖ -page76). Care needs to be taken in development of the operational plan that this is avoided.In general, the researchable constraints and the approaches and methods (scientific and socialscientific) that will be used to address them are well set out and well-referenced. Noting the exceptions above, research activities are feasible and likely to lead to significant new knowledge. The CGIAR Centers have a track record in carrying out research such as that described in the proposal which is highly relevant in the case of Theme 1 and Component 3.1, and significant in the case of Theme 2. More specification of the composition and experience of teams working on Component 3.2 (gender) would be useful. The Proposal provides an analysis of risks inherent in the approach and the research, but this is rather superficial. This part of the Proposal would benefit from a more thorough analysis, perhaps after some of the initial familiarization of the selected value chains, partners and stakeholders have been identified. The critical factor will be the ability of the Program to bring together the good biological science, technology and the social science into a coherent delivery platform.CRP3.7 includes a focused and well-reasoned partnership strategy and allocates the intellectual and financial resources needed to leverage the strategy's full value. The strategy itself moves well beyond the general formulations on the subject of partnership to a much more realistic and disciplined approach to assuring that partnerships are cultivated and utilized effectively. Evidence for this is the inclusion of a Development Manager as part of the program management team who will provide the strategy with CRP-level leadership and coordination, and a recognition expressed in a number of places in the proposal that effective partnerships will require more skill and work than simply identifying the potential range and types of partners and expressing good intentions about their engagement. The inclusion of Capacity Development activities is welcome.The CRP proposes three broad research themes and proposes research on value chains in 10 countries. Each of the themes requires strong partnerships to realize their full potential, but the focus on meat, milk and fish value chains in specific countries is heavily dependent on strengthening existing relationships and cultivating new and meaningful relationships at every level-from -small scale producers, employees…, small scale entrepreneurs,…and consumers‖ through to development partners, and policy makers. The four CGIAR Centers that serve as core partners for the project bring long standing networks and relationships tied to existing projects within each of the seven countries, and also add to the strategy that relies on broader regional and international partners to facilitate investment and dissemination. The proposal clearly identifies the additional points in the program where CRP3.7 dovetails with other CRPs, particularly those dealing with integrated systems and policy. However, it is notable that ICRISAT, one of the CGIAR Centers with a research history in dual purpose crops in South Asia is absent from this proposal. Current research which is not, or may not, going to be prioritised by participants/players in the value chains may cause disillusionment.The proposal identifies two principal types of partners-strategic program partners and value chain partners-as well as a number of roles for partners-those who can advance research, a broad array with the potential to achieve the proposals development goals, and those with the expertise and access to facilitate communication and build broader uptake of the program's results. In addition the proposal highlights the multiple roles of the private sector as science partners and as business partners [p. [75][76]. The latter is defined inclusively to include businesses at every scale, from the small livestock keeper to the multi-national corporation. Close working with partners on specific value chains though may make it difficult to implement exit strategies from specific value chains should that prove necessary if external drivers change the threats and opportunities for individual value chains in relation to the program goal. The involvement of strategic program partners on the Science and Partnership Forum (p 74) is therefore important and could help to challenge the team of the need to generate global public goods.The partnership strategy includes a number of mechanisms to assure its effective implementation-an assessment process to identify the necessary partners, working groups for each value chain, and a recognition that the program staff will need to bring new skills to their assignments, including -interpersonal, facilitation, conflict management, feedback and negotiation skills [p.77].‖ Theme 3, in which monitoring and evaluation will take place, will also play a role by monitoring partnership processes and developing -incentives…for program teams to demonstrate the development and effective management of required partnerships.‖ The results of M and E are essential for comparisons of results across chains and for disentangling local from generic benefits. A basic agreement for data collection is needed and in addition specifics for the chain and local situation.The descriptions of the value chains vary according to experience in the particular country and area. In most cases partner inclusion is logical, but not definitive as the diagnostic studies will yield more contacts, potential organisations and focus. The program shows appropriate awareness of the role of research and development partners. However, as with the identification of previous relevant research, this seems to be still work in progress and the -Partnership Strategy will include an assessment of the actor (sic) and organizational landscape at the national and sub-national levels. Potential partners and their roles have yet to be finally identified from the long list of candidates.The program could pay more attention to basic research and adaptive and applied research phases. The more adaptive research (on farm testing) takes more time and is more costly and raises the question of who will take this on and how will extension, private industry involvement and government contribute? Policy and institutional changes are frequently addressed in the program. Sometimes legal changes are required 2 . Partners for legal change should become involved in the program and for IPR issues.The structure does attempt to address the tension of applying a consortium model to the program (which implies a consultative process of decision making and overall shared ownership of and responsibility for program success and outputs), while still retaining clear leadership roles, and specific accountability for designated elements of the program by each institution and team. The ISPC considers that CRP3.7 proposes a strong and efficient management structure. It demonstrates a realistic grasp of the level and focus of program-level management required to achieve the program integration and partnership goals required by its research structure.The program management staff include clearly identified positions to lead and manage critically important elements of the proposal-partnership development and management, knowledge management and communications, as well as internal monitoring and evaluation. These positions support implementation of the program, but also assure that the strategies for engaging significant new partners and leveraging outcomes have the expertise and attention they require to be successful.The Program Planning and Management Committee's initial membership signals the functionality of the committee. The proposal notes the assumption that the core CGIAR Centers will be adequately represented because of the role of their staff in program leadership. This relieves the committee of having to function as both a management entity and a representative body. The proposal mentions the potential inclusion of external partners who invest and play critical roles comparable to the core Centers. This may be a practical necessity and a good thing, but it may also compromise the focus, function and rigor of the PPMC if it becomes a mechanism for recognizing investors. A reassuring counterweight to this possibility is the care with which the proposal describes the working values that will guide the CRP. The CRP argues persuasively that the program's development and implementation reflect a commitment to -a consortium model [for] the partnership [p.69].‖ In pursuing this approach, the lead institution is not only required to engage in consultative, joint decision making with other core partners, but also -to generally cede a significant part of the strategic decision process to the partnership [p.69].‖ While this could be viewed as reassuring rhetoric, the overall structure, focus and tone of the proposal support the likelihood that this is not an empty commitment on the part of ILRI. The ISPC does not find it necessary to comment (as with many other CRPs) on the lead Center's relationship with the Program Director, both because the position has the necessary authority to deliver effective management of the CRP and because the Lead Center's DG is not given an out-of-scale role in program management. Whilst the role of the Program Director was clear and appropriate, the mechanism for appointing the leads of the 3 Technology Development components and the other 2 themes was not clear. For example, with respect to the Health component, the approaches for livestock and fish health seem very distinct; will one person represent both or will there be 2 representatives to ensure that World Fish has an adequate representation on the Committee?If the proposal has one management shortcoming, it is the lack of an integrated strategy for resource mobilization that is expressed as part of program-level management-although this may be a responsibility of the Development Manager. In the proposal, the program teams for the value chains are expected to identify partners who will invest in the program, and internal M&E will include this as an element in evaluating team performance. Also in the proposal, strategic partners are defined in part by the level of investment they make, and finally, the budget estimates include a -global budget‖ that identifies approximately $20 million in additional investments required to fully scale and implement the CRP. The program should articulate its goals and strategy for resource mobilization more clearly; partners and donors are conflated throughout the proposal-sometimes they will be one, sometimes the other, sometimes both. In a world in which significant investments of resources will be required (and are justified), the word -donor‖ is not unseemly.This committee has three functions-one is to provide strategic advice and oversight to the CRP, the second is to facilitate linkages with global and regional stakeholders, and the third is to report annually to the ILRI DG and Board as part of the CRP's accountability process. In its first two functions, it reports to the PPMC and Program Director and is intended to be a powerful contributor to strategy and prioritization by offering advice and independent assessment of science quality and impact. Its reporting relationship to both management and the Lead Center's governing body is potentially workable-providing independent oversight closely linked to the CRP without adding additional complexity to oversight. To make this work, it will be important to ensure that the committee is more clearly defined than it is now. Although the general framework for its composition is clear, the proposal does not indicate how its members will be appointed and for how long. There is no indication of its optimum size and, as now described, it has no Chair or similar leadership. Because the SPAC reports first to the PPMC and Program Director, and then to ILRI's Board, it is important that responsibility for identifying its members does not rest wholly on the Program Director. In addition, it will be important to identify the criteria for inclusion on the committee to avoid it becoming a high level holding area for partners and donors that need visible recognition and influence as a condition of their support and engagement.Financial Soundness: The budget narrative and projected income and expenses are clear, although program management and communications are combined in the budget presentation. While the overall allocation appears to be reasonable and consistent with other CRPs, the proposal describes a very extensive knowledge sharing and communication strategy that implies a substantial (and appropriate) investment. On a very minor note, the budget allocations for the individual value chains (which are aggregated into Theme 2) are clearly described in the narrative but would have had additional clarity if represented in a table.Over three years, the CGIAR Fund is projected to provide $35.2 million toward a total program budget of $99.6 million [Table 3.7,p. 97]. As noted earlier, the budget presentation includes a -budget for global outcomes‖ [Table 2.8], which argues for an additional $20 million investment in the program.The proposal includes a clear and persuasive rationale for what the additional investment would achieve and also notes that it -would require higher levels of funding from multiple sources [p.98].‖ It goes on to note that some aspects of the proposal assume greater capacity to raise additional resources (the value chain components) than others (technology development). This raises the question of whether the CRP is requesting sufficient support from the CGIAR Fund. It also raises the question of whether -global outcomes‖ are within reach, because the core partners have the capacity or have identified a strategy, to raise the balance, or their achievement is at risk. In a proposal that is generally clear and straightforward, this final section is less so. Does the proposal need more from the Fund than it indicates? If it is outlining the additional funds it will seek (with some confidence) from others, that should have also been made clearer. Finally, detail on how the competitive grant scheme would be operated was rather light.The Science and Partnership Advisory Committee has been referred to above. With some careful adjustments, this committee is in a position to provide the CRP with a mechanism for independent and effective oversight.","tokenCount":"5666"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1651603878.json b/data/part_2/1651603878.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2da16ab11759d7ad610e7c53cfb8cb957bdd5321 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1651603878.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ad12bf688add27c8c18fc02a110e4642","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/9ae9b195-4ce9-4287-879d-11918f08d68e/retrieve","id":"731053915"},"keywords":["Kepngop, L.R.K.","Wosula, E.N.","Amour, M.","Ghomsi, P.G.T.","Wakam, L.N.","Kansci, G.","Legg, J.P. Genetic Diversity of Whiteflies Colonizing Crops and Their Bemisia tabaci","KASP","Arsenophonus","Wolbachia","Rickettsia"],"sieverID":"66277291-ef31-4531-9e60-03324cb22f56","pagecount":"18","content":"Bemisia tabaci is as a major pest of vegetable crops in Cameroon, and several species have developed resistance against insecticides. Here, we investigated the frequency of infection by endosymbiont and the genetic diversity of whiteflies in Cameroon. Mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (mtCOI) markers and Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR (KASP) were used for the characterization. Overall, an analysis of the mtCOI sequences showed six mitotypes of Bemisia tabaci, and two distinct clades of Bemisia afer and Trialeurodes vaporariorum. Bemisia tabaci mitotypes identified included: Mediterranean (MED) on tomato, pepper, okra, and melon; and sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) groups and sub-groups (SG)-SSA1-SG1, SSA1-SG2, SSA1-SG5, SSA3, and SSA4 on cassava. The six mitotypes of cassava B. tabaci were split into three SNP haplogroups including sub-Saharan Africa-West Africa (SSA-WA), sub-Saharan East and Central Africa (SSA-ECA), and SSA4 by KASP genotyping. The endosymbionts identified infecting the whiteflies were Arsenophonus, Rickettsia, and Wolbachia.The whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) is a significant pest that damages many plants worldwide such as ornamentals, vegetables, legumes, and cotton [1]. Whitefly species of this complex are extremely polyphagous insects, and they are found in greenhouses and crop fields in temperate and tropical regions [2,3]. In sub-tropical and tropical countries, B. tabaci is one of the principal pests, especially on the main food and cash crops such as cassava, cotton, sweet potato, tobacco, and tomato [4]. These whiteflies have a severe impact on the economic activity and food security of many farmers and populations, since agriculture is one of the main economic activities [4]. Bemisia tabaci whiteflies have the ability to carry viruses with semi-persistent and persistent mechanisms and can vector viruses belonging to at least five genera (Begomovirus, Crinivirus, Ipomovirus, Carlavirus, and Torradovirus) [5]. Their sap-sucking feeding also causes physical damage to plants, although the most damage caused is by the vectoring of over 300 plant viruses [1]. Economic losses due to B. tabaci were estimated at USD 10 billion from 1980 to 2000 [6] in the US, and over USD 1 billion annually on cassava in Africa [7]. Bemisia tabaci has been described as a cryptic species complex with more than 39 morphologically indistinguishable species [3,8,9]. Most of these species are localized in geographic regions [10] except a few, among which two occur worldwide and are invasive: the \"Mediterranean\" or \"MED\" species (previously referred as 'Biotype Q') and the \"Middle East-Asia Minor\" species (\"MEAM1\"-previously referred to as 'Biotype B') [2]. Among these whitefly species, there are many that colonize Solanaceae [11,12] and these have shown the ability to rapidly develop resistance to chemical insecticides [4,13]. In Africa, despite the harmful impact on potential natural enemies and on the environment, chemical pesticides are widely used to control B. tabaci populations. Whiteflies are infected with facultative endosymbiont bacteria that have been implicated in their pest status, as they have been shown to affect tolerance to insecticides [14], virus transmission efficiency [15,16], and high-temperature tolerance [17]. As with many other arthropods, endosymbiotic bacteria are also widespread in B. tabaci [18]. Endosymbionts are present in many parts of insects, such as the whitefly body cavity, hemolymph, or intracellularly in special cells called bacteriocytes [19]. Members of the Bemisia species complex carry a primary endosymbiotic bacterium called Candidatus Portiera aleyrodidarum [20,21], which is fixed in populations and confined to bacteriocyte cells, with a main role in the regulation of amino acid-deficient diets in all whiteflies [20]. This bacterium is essential for host survival and development and has a long co-evolutionary history with all members of the subfamily Aleyrodidae [20,22,23]. In addition to the primary endosymbiont, many different secondary endosymbionts may be present, such as Rickettsia [24], Wolbachia [25,26], Hamiltonella and Arsenophonus [20,21], Cardinium [27], and Fritschea [28]. These have been reported from Bemisia populations around the world. Several of these secondary endosymbionts interfere with host physiology, ecology, and reproduction [29][30][31], and they may have effects on rapid evolutionary shifts [32], thermotolerance [17], resistance to insecticides [14], host fitness [33], defense against pathogens [34], and virus transmission ability [15,[35][36][37].Several Bemisia mitotype populations around the world have been surveyed for infection with endosymbionts and showed a clear variation in the infection frequency within the Bemisia genetic groups [18,[38][39][40]. For example, in populations tested from China, Wolbachia, Rickettsia, Arsenophonus, Hamiltonella, and Cardinium were detected in MEAM1 and MED populations [41]. Arsenophonus, Cardinium, Rickettsia, and Wolbachia were detected in native whiteflies of Africa [39], China [38], and India [42], but not Hamiltonella and Fritschea. A study by Gorsane et al. [43] hypothesized that the presence of Cardinium in MEAM1 and Cardinium, Fritschea, and Wolbachia in MED may explain the differences in infestation status possibly due to plant host variability, site to site variations, and the influence of chemical insecticides. Also, Hamiltonella in MED and Rickettsia in MEAM1 populations are also reported to increase the acquisition, retention, and transmission of the Tomato yellow leaf curl virus [44,45]. However, recent work on cassava whiteflies indicated that the coinfection of Bemisia tabaci colonies of sub-Saharan Africa 1 sub-group 3 (SSA1-SG3) by two secondary endosymbiotic bacteria Arsenophonus and Rickettsia reduced their ability to transmit East African cassava mosaic virus-Uganda (EACMV-UG) and these whiteflies also showed lower adult emergence, slower development, and lower virus retention abilities than those free of bacteria [46]. Skaljac et al. [47] showed that Hamiltonella and Arsenophonus were strictly localized to the bacteriocytes during all developmental stages in T. vaporariorum. However, they are less likely to be able to manipulate their host's reproduction since this requires invading reproductive organs outside the bacteriocyte. This observation suggests that Hamiltonella and Arsenophonus in T. vaporariorum are involved in a functional advantage rather than its reproduction [47].For effective whitefly management, therefore, it is important to make the correct species identification, including the identification of intracellular bacterial communities. Many aspects of this species complex remain unknown, such as the degree of genetic isolation between some species, their geographical distribution, as well as the withinspecies genetic diversity and endosymbiont species being carried by whiteflies. Knowing which species of whitefly is present in Cameroon and its associated endosymbionts is crucial for the management of this pest. Because these cryptic species of whitefly are morphologically indistinguishable [3], we used molecular tools (mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I sequences-mtCOI and Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR-KASP) for identification. In the study reported here, the endosymbiont colonization frequency and results from whitefly mtCOI sequencing and KASP were combined to provide an overall assessment of the genetic diversity of B. tabaci in Cameroon.Field surveys were conducted in four regions of Cameroon by using standardized diagnostic protocols described by many authors [48][49][50]. This involved collecting data and sampling (counting whiteflies and collecting specimens for molecular identification) from cassava, tomatoes, pepper, and okra young plants. The number and distribution of collection sites varied, according to the number of fields that were found in each location and the relative abundance of B. tabaci in those fields. A total of 24 fields were randomly chosen and surveyed from the four regions. Whitefly samples were collected from fifteen fields of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz), four fields of tomato (4) (Solanum lycopersicum L.), three fields of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.), one field of melon (Cucumis melo L.) and one field of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) across twelve locations in three (monomodal rainforest, bimodal rainforest, and highland) agroecological zones across Cameroon (Table 1). The locations included Ngoa Ekelle, Minkoameyos, Awae, Bangangte, Manko'o, Mantem, Nyang, Ngohsi, Djibeeng, Balngong, Bandoumou, and Melen. Bemisia tabaci-colonizing tomatoes were collected from two locations and four fields (Manko'o in the highland agroecological zone and Awae in the bimodal rainforest agroecological zone). Bemisia tabaci on cassava were sampled from 10 locations and 15 fields (Ngoa Ekelle, Minkoameyos, Awae, Balngong, and Bandoumou, all located in the bimodal rainforest agroecological zone, Bangangte in the highland agroecological zone, and Mantem, Nyang, Ngohsi, and Djibeeng in the monomodal rainforest). On okra, B. tabaci were collected from two locations and three fields (Minkoameyos and Awae located in the bimodal rainforest agroecological zone). On melon, B. tabaci were collected from one location and one field (Ngoa Ekelle in the bimodal rainforest agroecological zone). On pepper, B. tabaci were collected from one location and one field (Melen in the bimodal rainforest agroecological zone). In each field, 20 plants were randomly selected along two diagonal transects across the field and whiteflies were counted from the top five leaves of vegetable and for cassava. Approximately 40 B. tabaci adult whiteflies were collected from each field and all whiteflies collected from a single field were considered to be a single sample. Whiteflies were aspirated alive and immediately preserved in 95% ethanol in vials, before being stored in the freezer at −20 • C.DNA extraction was carried out in the molecular laboratory at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. The insects (single female whiteflies) were added to 3 µL of lysis buffer in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube, then macerated and another 20 µL of lysis buffer was added. The lysis buffer contained 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0, 50 mM KCL, 2.5 mM MgCl, 0.45% Tween-20, 0.01% Gelatine, and 60 µg/mL Proteinase). The mixture was then vortex shaken and spun down and immediately incubated on ice for 15 min. This was followed by incubation at 55 • C in a water bath for 30 min. The lysate was then stored at −20 • C for downstream use. For PCR use, the lysate was diluted while using sterile diethylpyrocarbonate (DPEC) treated water in a ratio of 1:9.PCR products of the mtCOI fragment were produced using the forward primer 2195-Bt-F (5 ′ -TGRTTTTTTGGTCATCCRGAAGT-3 ′ ) and C012-Bt-sh2-R (5 ′ -TTTACTGCACTTTCTGCC-3 ′ ) [51] to target Bemisia whiteflies (~850 bp), and universal primers LCO-1490-F (5 ′ -GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3 ′ ) and HCO-2198-R (5 ′ -TAAACTTCAGGGTGA-CCAAAAAATCA-3 ′ ) to target non-Bemisia whiteflies (~710 bp) using a thermocycler (Applied Biosystems™ GeneAmp R PCR system 9700, Foster City, CA, USA), under the following conditions: first cycle of denaturation at 95 • C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 • C for 40 s, and annealing at 54 • C for 30 s, 72 • C for 45 s, and the final extension at 72 • C for 10 min. A total reaction mixture of 25 µL was made up of 1X QuickLoad Master Mix (New England Biolabs, Hitchin, UK), 1 mM MgCl, 0.24 µM of each primer, 2 µL DNA, and nuclease-free water.The PCR products were electrophoresed in a 1% agarose gel stained in GelRed (Biotium, Hayward, CA, USA) at 100 V for 30 min in gels buffered with a 1 × TAE buffer. DNA bands were visualized under ultraviolet light (UVP GelStudio PLUS, Analytik Jena, Upland, CA, USA) and only samples with intact bands were selected for sequencing. PCR products were sent to Psomagen Inc. (Rockville, MD, USA) for purification and direct sequencing. DNA sequences were manually edited using Ridom Trace Edit v1.1.0 software (Ridom GmbH., Würzburg, Germany). The sequences were assembled into contigs using CLC Main Workbench 22 (QIAGEN, Aarhus, Denmark). A multiple alignment of the edited sequences was performed using Clustal W in MEGA version 7 [52] and the sequences were trimmed. The construction of a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was performed using MEGA with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Sequences were blasted using GenBank's (NCBI) Blastn and selected reference sequences with 99% to 100% identity to our mtCOI sequences were included in the phylogenetic tree for comparison with previously published haplotypes. The outgroup Bemisia afer was included in the phylogenetic tree for Bemisia tabaci, while the outgroups Bemisia afer, B. tabaci, and Aleurodicus dispersus were included for Trialeurodes vaporariorum.Kompetitive Allele-Specific PCR (KASP) was used to further distinguish the major genotypes of cassava-colonizing B. tabaci [53]. The KASP reaction mixture (10 µL) contained 5 µL 2X KASP master mix, 0.14 µL KASP primer assay mix, and 5 µL DNA template ( C) was used for the primer BTS613. The quality of genotyping cluster plots was visually assessed, and only samples in distinct clusters were considered for manual SNP calling, using the MxPro -Mx3000P software incorporated in the Strategene MX 3000P unit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and KlusterCaller (LGC Genomics, Teddington, UK). The KASP protocol for B. tabaci is described in detail in Wosula et al. [53].The DNA extracts from 75 whitefly specimens that were identified through mtCOI sequencing were used for bacterial endosymbiont diagnoses. The PCR was performed using a total volume of 25 µL containing 2 µL template DNA, 12.5 µL OneTaq Quick-Load 2X Master Mix (New England Biolabs, Hitchin, UK) with Standard Buffer, 0.6 µL of primer (0.25 mM) (Table 2), 1 µL MgCl2 (25 mM) solution, and 8.9 µL of sterile water. A total of 35 cycles of amplification were carried out in a Veriti 96-Well Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and conditions were the same for all sets of primers except for the annealing temperature (Table 2): denaturation at 95 • C for 3 min and 94 • C for 30 s, annealing temperature as showed in Table 2 for 45 s, and extension at 72 • C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 • C for 7 min and held at 10 • C. Amplified PCR products were separated using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, stained with GelRed (Biotium, Hayward, CA, USA) with a 100 bp ladder (NEB, England, UK), and then visualized under ultraviolet light (UVP GelStudio PLUS, Analytik Jena, Upland, CA, USA). All PCRs included a negative control (sterile water) to spot any DNA contamination, and a positive control to prevent false negatives.Mean whitefly counts varied with survey site (Table 3). The mean whitefly count per plant across the country was 8.0 for cassava, 29.7 for tomato, 31.6 for okra, 60.0 for melon, and 18.0 for pepper. At the regional level, the mean whitefly count varied from 2.9 in the Littoral region to 12.5 in the southwest region for cassava. In addition, mean whitefly counts on vegetable crops such as tomato, pepper, melon, and okra were high and ranged from 18 to 60. The highest whitefly mean count of 60 was recorded for the center region on Melon, while the Littoral region had the lowest mean (2.9) except on cassava. Field-level data showed many fields with whitefly counts higher than 50 per plant located in the center, southwest, and west regions. In total, 92 whitefly samples were sequenced, out of which 75 produced quality mtCOI sequences. There was a high level of diversity among B. tabaci populations that were collected from the sampled crop plants. The sequences obtained from whiteflies collected from pepper, okra, and melon were grouped into one phylogenetic group (MED), but whiteflies from tomato were grouped into two phylogenetically distinct groups: B. tabaci MED and Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood). The sequences from cassava were grouped into five mitotypes of B. tabaci (SSA1-SG1, SSA1-SG2, SSA1-SG5, SSA3, and SSA4) and two Bemisia afer (Priesner and Hosny) clades (Figures 1-3). These groups were identified based on the topology of the phylogenetic tree and the clustering of the sequences that were obtained from this study relative to the reference sequences retrieved from GenBank. The predominant B. tabaci mitotype MED had a total of 23 whiteflies, which accounted for 30.3% of all the whiteflies collected from the four host plants (tomato, okra, melon, and pepper) and they were distributed in the two agroecological zones where these samples were collected (bimodal rainforest and highland). The second most abundant B. tabaci mitotype was SSA4 with 17 whiteflies (22.4%), with all of them being found on cassava, and they were distributed in all three agroecological zones (monomodal rainforest, bimodal rainforest, and highland). The other mitotypes occurring on cassava were SSA1-SG1 (1.3%) (monomodal rainforest agroecological zone), SSA1-SG2 (4.0%) (monomodal rainforest and bimodal rainforest agroecological zone), SSA1-SG5 (1.3%) (monomodal rainforest agroecological zone), and SSA3 (2.6%) (monomodal rainforest agroecological zone). Bemisia afer had two distinct clades with 19 whiteflies, which accounted for 25.3% of the sequences. It was present on cassava in all three sampled regions (monomodal rainforest, bimodal rainforest, and highland agroecological zone). Trialeurodes vaporariorum (10 whiteflies accounting for 13.2% of the sequences) was present only on tomato in the highland agroecological zone. Sequences from this study were deposited in the NCBI database accessions PP580858-PP580933. The KASP genotyping results are based on SNP genotyping, and it has been designed to discriminate between the major genotypes of cassava B. tabaci whitefly. Twenty-four whiteflies that were identified as cassava B. tabaci based on mtCOI sequencing were further characterized using KASP genotyping. The SNP genotyping clusters for the The KASP genotyping results are based on SNP genotyping, and it has been designed to discriminate between the major genotypes of cassava B. tabaci whitefly. Twenty-four whiteflies that were identified as cassava B. tabaci based on mtCOI sequencing were further characterized using KASP genotyping. The SNP genotyping clusters for the selected four primers for representative samples are presented in Figures 4 and 5. KASP genotyping split the 24 cassava whitefly samples into three haplogroups: SSA-ECA, SSA-WA, and SSA4. Haplogroup SSA4 with 15 samples out of the 24 (62.5%) was the most frequent, and included mtCOI mitotypes SSA4 (10), SSA3 (2), SSA1-SG2 (2), and SSA1-SG5 (1). The haplogroup SSA-ECA was the second most frequent with five samples (20.8%), all of which were designated as mitotype SSA4. The last haplogroup SSA-WA had four samples (16.7%) that were designated as mitotypes SSA4 (2), SSA1-SG2 (1), and SSA1-SG5 (1). This is the first study to report the designation of mitotype SSA4 samples into SNP haplogroup SSA-ECA (Table 4). SSA-ECA SSA1-SG1 SSA1-SG2, SSA1-SG1/SG2, SSA4 [54][55][56][57]; in this study SSA-ESA SSA1-SG3, SSA1-SG2 [54,[56][57][58]; SSA-WA SSAA1-SG1, SSA1-SG5, SSA2, SSA4 [56,57]; in this study SSA-CA SSA1-SG1, SSA1-SG2[56] SSA2 SSA2, SSA3, SSA4 [54,56,57] SSA4 SSA4, SSA1-SG2, SSA1-SG5 [56,57]; in this studyThe primary endosymbiont Portiera was detected in 77% of the whiteflies identified by mtCOI and KASP (75). Therefore, only whiteflies with at least three specimens and bearing Portiera were used to evaluate the presence of secondary endosymbionts. The secondary endosymbionts were found in 78% (45 whiteflies infected out of 58 tested) of the insects, and their frequency varied significantly across the different whitefly populations. The SSA4 mitotype showed the highest percentage of no secondary endosymbiont with 50% of non-infection. However, none of the whitefly samples showed an infection by the endosymbionts Hamiltonella and Cardinium (Figure 6). The identified SSA-ECA SSA1-SG1 SSA1-SG2, SSA1-SG1/SG2, SSA4 [54][55][56][57]; in this study SSA-ESA SSA1-SG3, SSA1-SG2 [54,[56][57][58];SSA-WA SSAA1-SG1, SSA1-SG5, SSA2, SSA4 [56,57]; in this study SSA-CA SSA1-SG1, SSA1-SG2 [56] SSA2 SSA2, SSA3, SSA4 [54,56,57] SSA4 SSA4, SSA1-SG2, SSA1-SG5 [56,57]; in this studyThe samples in the SSA4 group were from Ngoa Ekelle, Minkoameyos, Awae, Bangangte, Mantem, Nyang, Djibeeng, and Bandoumou located in the three agroecological zones. Samples in the SSA-ECA group were from Ngoa Ekelle, Balngong, and Bandoumou in the central part of Cameroon located in the bimodal rainforest agroecological zone, while those in SSA-WA were from Mantem and Nyang in the monomodal rainforest agroecological zone of western Cameroon, as well as from Ngoa ekelle and Awae in the bimodal rainforest agroecological zone in the central part of the country.The primary endosymbiont Portiera was detected in 77% of the whiteflies identified by mtCOI and KASP (75). Therefore, only whiteflies with at least three specimens and bearing Portiera were used to evaluate the presence of secondary endosymbionts. The secondary endosymbionts were found in 78% (45 whiteflies infected out of 58 tested) of the insects, and their frequency varied significantly across the different whitefly populations. The SSA4 mitotype showed the highest percentage of no secondary endosymbiont with 50% of non-infection. However, none of the whitefly samples showed an infection by the endosymbionts Hamiltonella and Cardinium (Figure 6). The identified endosymbionts were more often in single infections in cassava-colonizing whiteflies than non-cassava whiteflies, except in T. vaporariorium where Arsenophonus singly infected 100% (7/7) of the specimens. In the MED mitotype, infection by the combination of Arsenophonus (A), Wolbachia (W), and Rickettsia (R) was the most represented (41%). Only A (18%) and W (6%) were identified in single infection and all other infections were in coinfection with Arsenophonus AR (23%) and AW (12%). Whiteflies collected on cassava and identified as B. afer had infections with all of the endosymbionts dominated by the single infections of A (38%) and W (23%). No triple infection was recorded but all possible double infections were detected as AR (8%), AW (23%), and RW (8%). The SSA4 mitotype was singly infected with Wolbachia (W) in 72% of the specimens followed by Arsenophonus (A) and Rickettsia (R) with 14% each. The SSA1-SG2 mitotype had single infections of W (33%) but 67% of this mitotype were not infected by the secondary endosymbiont (Figure 6). Considering only infected whiteflies, Arsenophonus (95.8%; 23/24) was the most frequently represented endosymbiont in non-cassava whiteflies (MED, T. vaporariorium). However, in cassava whiteflies (SSA4, SSA1-SG2, and Bemisia afer) Wolbachia was the most frequently represented (56.5%; 13/23).Insects 2024, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 13 of 21 endosymbionts were more often in single infections in cassava-colonizing whiteflies than non-cassava whiteflies, except in T. vaporariorium where Arsenophonus singly infected 100% (7/7) of the specimens. In the MED mitotype, infection by the combination of Arsenophonus (A), Wolbachia (W), and Rickettsia (R) was the most represented (41%). Only A (18%) and W (6%) were identified in single infection and all other infections were in coinfection with Arsenophonus AR (23%) and AW (12%). Whiteflies collected on cassava and identified as B. afer had infections with all of the endosymbionts dominated by the single infections of A (38%) and W (23%). No triple infection was recorded but all possible double infections were detected as AR (8%), AW (23%), and RW (8%). The SSA4 mitotype was singly infected with Wolbachia (W) in 72% of the specimens followed by Arsenophonus (A) and Rickettsia (R) with 14% each. The SSA1-SG2 mitotype had single infections of W (33%) but 67% of this mitotype were not infected by the secondary endosymbiont (Figure 6). Considering only infected whiteflies, Arsenophonus (95.8%; 23/24) was the most frequently represented endosymbiont in non-cassava whiteflies (MED, T. vaporariorium). However, in cassava whiteflies (SSA4, SSA1-SG2, and Bemisia afer) Wolbachia was the most frequently represented (56.5%; 13/23). The current study confirmed that whiteflies occur widely on vegetables and cassava throughout Cameroon, and their abundance depends on the host plant species and agroecological region. The number of whiteflies was higher on vegetables compared to cassava; this could be attributed to the fact that the mitotype MED found on vegetables is an invasive species known for rapid resistance development to insecticides, hence high The current study confirmed that whiteflies occur widely on vegetables and cassava throughout Cameroon, and their abundance depends on the host plant species and agroecological region. The number of whiteflies was higher on vegetables compared to cassava; this could be attributed to the fact that the mitotype MED found on vegetables is an invasive species known for rapid resistance development to insecticides, hence high populations [3]. The abundance of whiteflies in vegetables is linked with increased spread and the severity of virus diseases [59,60].An analysis of the genetic diversity of the whiteflies collected showed that the three whitefly species commonly occurring on cassava and vegetables were B. tabaci, B. afer, and T. vaporariorum. Whilst B. afer and B. tabaci occurred widely throughout the agroecological zones sampled, T. vaporariorum was only reported from tomato in the highland zone. T. vaporariorum is commonly called the greenhouse whitefly and has a more temperate distribution than the two Bemisia species. In Africa, T. vaporariorum only occurs in high altitude and cooler regions [61].Bemisia afer accounted for 25% of the Bemisia spp in samples from Cameroon and it was identified in all of the agroecological zones. Although B. afer is not currently considered to be a significant threat to cassava production in Africa, it has been shown to be an economically important viral vector in other crops, transmitting the sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus in sweet potatoes in Peru [62]. This highlights the importance of careful monitoring of this second cassava-colonizing Bemisia species in Africa.The clustering of the cassava B. tabaci whitefly mitotypes SSA1-SG1, SSA1-SG2, SSA1-SG5, SSA3, and SSA4 into a distinct major clade separate from B. tabaci whiteflies that do not colonize cassava is consistent with what has been reported in other studies of B. tabaci from various cassava-growing countries in Africa [57,63]. The grouping of the MED mitotype is also consistent with what has been reported in previous studies [63]. We found that B. tabaci MED was predominant on okra, pepper, tomato, and melon in all of the sampled locations. MED is a globally important B. tabaci mitotype, which is thought to have originated from countries neighboring the Mediterranean basin, which include Algeria, Morocco, Egypt, and Sudan in Africa [3,64]. Consequently, there are numerous other reports of its prevalence on a wide range of crop and weed hosts [55,63,[65][66][67]. B. tabaci MED has been reported to be extremely polyphagous and invasive [3], causing damage to both field and greenhouse crops [68]. It has also developed resistance to various insecticides under intensive production systems [69][70][71]. The mitotype B. tabaci MED was also the most abundant whitefly collected. As confirmed by the results on whitefly abundance, evidence elsewhere has suggested that begomovirus infection can increase B tabaci MED fecundity, which facilitates its spread [72]. The predominance of MED on major vegetable crops considered in this study confirms that this is the most important whitefly pest of vegetables in Cameroon.In the studied cassava group of B. tabaci, the largest number of samples based on mtCOI sequencing were in the SSA4 mitotype, and these were widely distributed across the sampled locations. SSA4 has previously been reported on cassava in Cameroon accounting for 15% [73] and 37% [56] of the cassava whitefly samples. The findings from this study suggest SSA4 is increasing in dominance compared to other mitotypes. SSA1-SG1 and SSA1-SG5 were less frequent, as they were only detected at a single location each. In another study, a similar trend was reported for samples obtained from cassava in Cameroon, where 7% were identified as SSA1-SG1, while none were identified as SSA1-SG5 [56]. These results differ from other recent findings from East and Central Africa, which have shown SSA1-SG1 to be the predominant B. tabaci mitotype on cassava [7,54,57,74]. SSA2 was not encountered in the current study, although this may be a consequence of the absence of samples from northern parts of Cameroon. A similar result was reported elsewhere [73], where only SSA3 and SSA4 were recorded, although other research on cassava B. tabaci in Cameroon, which included samples from the north of the country, recorded SSA2 making up 44% of the total types found [56]. This trend of presence or absence of SSA2 depending on the duration of the surveys is not unique; it has been observed in East Africa where SSA2 was reported as being absent in samples collected from cassava [75,76], and then reported present with subsequent surveys [51,56,57,77]. In South Sudan, SSA2 was reported as the most predominant mitotype on cassava accounting for 75% of the samples that were collected from the cassava plants [55]. Similarly, the current study noted the presence of SSA1-SG5 and SSA1-SG2, which were not found in previous studies [56,57], although, importantly, the sample collection locations differed between the studies. An accurate identification of these species is critical for the effective management of whiteflies both as pests and as virus vectors. The development of the KASP diagnostic method, based on a large SNP dataset for B. tabaci in Africa, provided important means for distinguishing between the major genetic groupings of B. tabaci occurring on cassava in Africa [53]. This method allows for the identification of these haplogroups in laboratory procedures lasting a matter of hours and with no requirement for sequencing. This study builds on the importance of adopting KASP as a diagnostic method for cassava B. tabaci whiteflies as it reports for the first time mitotype SSA4 samples designated as SNP haplogroups SSA-ECA and SSA-WA (Table 4). An important outcome of SNPs' analysis and the application of KASP has been the recognition of an association between the haplogroup SSA-ECA and regions currently affected by severe CMD and CBSD pandemics [56].The most common SNP haplogroup, however, was SSA4. For the first time, this haplogroup included samples that were designated as mitotypes SSA1-SG5 and SSA1-SG2. Previously, samples identified as SSA4 using KASP, based on SNPs' analysis, only had mitotypes SSA3 and SSA4 [53,56]. There were similar novel associations between SSA-WA and mitotype SSA4; previously, SSA-WA was reported to have mitotypes SSA1-SG5 (predominantly), SSA1-SG1, and SSA2 [56]. The present study also revealed that haplogroup SSA-ECA had all samples designated as mitotype SSA4. This is a first, as previously this SNP haplogroup only had samples of mitotypes SSA1-SG1, SSA1-SG2, and SSA1-SG1/SG2 [54][55][56]. Each of these sets of results provides further evidence of the weak association between identifications based on SNPs dispersed throughout the B. tabaci genome and identities derived from short, maternally-inherited mitochondrial COI sequences. Finally, this work shows, again, that there is not a good correlation between COI and KASP identities, which confirms the unreliability of using COI to identify B. tabaci genotypes.The identification of B. tabaci haplogroup SSA-ECA raises a concern about the potential future spread of cassava viruses in Cameroon, as SSA-ECA is predominant in areas associated with severe epidemics of CMD and CBSD in East, Central, and Southern Africa [54,56]. It is important to note, however, that CBSD has not yet been identified in Cameroon and has only so far been reported from East and Southern Africa. The most westerly report of CBSD has been made from the eastern part of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) [78].Microbial endosymbionts represent an important component of the biology and ecology of invertebrates like Bemisia. Major facultative endosymbionts Arsenophonus, Wolbachia, Hamiltonella, Cardinium, and Rickettsia were evaluated for all whitefly genetic groupings and the infection frequencies were significantly correlated with the whitefly genotype. The current study showed that cassava whiteflies are mostly infected by single endosymbionts rather than multiple infections, as had been observed from previous studies elsewhere in Africa [39]. However, MED, which occurred on crop plants other than cassava, showed a higher level of endosymbiont coinfection. In this study MED had diverse secondary endosymbiont communities comprising Arsenophonus, Rickettsia, and Wolbachia. Similar studies have reported the presence of these endosymbionts in this mitotype [4,11,[79][80][81][82]. MED individuals analyzed in this study were predominantly infected with Arsenophonus, which is comparable to findings from West Africa reporting a high prevalence of this endosymbiont in the ASL (=MED) mitotype [4]. By contrast, MED individuals collected from vegetables in Senegal were predominantly infected with Hamiltonella [11].The cassava B. tabaci cryptic species in this study had diverse endosymbiont infections comprising Arsenophonus, Rickettsia, and Wolbachia as reported in other studies [39,79,83]. The work of Ghosh et al. [39] showed that cassava whiteflies are infected by Arsenophonus, Rickettia, Wolbachia, and Cardinium with the predominance of Wolbachia in Tanzania, Malawi, Uganda, and Nigeria. Tajebe et al. [79] reported Arsenophonus, Rickettsia, Wolbachia, Hamiltonella, and Cardinium, with Arsenophonus being the most prevalent in cassava B. tabaci whiteflies in Tanzania.Trialeurodes vaporariorum was only infected with Arsenophonus, as noted elsewhere [84]. Hamiltonella and Cardinium were not detected in this study, although they have been reported in other studies on whiteflies collected from Africa [4,39,79,83]. Secondary endosymbionts in B. tabaci have been shown to have an influence on whitefly biology, survival, fecundity, heat tolerance, resistance/susceptibility to insecticides, and virus transmission [85]. Tajebe et al. [79] noted that the most striking feature of B. tabaci individuals sampled from the cassava virus pandemic that affected parts of Tanzania was the virtual absence of Arsenophonus. Furthermore, Ghosh et al. [46] reported that cassava B. tabaci, infected by Arsenophonus and Rickettsia, had decreased fitness and virus retention compared to whiteflies of the same type that were not infected by either endosymbiont. In our study, there was, overall, a much greater frequency of Arsenophonus in non-cassava whiteflies and B. afer compared to those B. tabaci (SSA4 and SSA1-SG2) individuals sampled from cassava. However, larger sample numbers of cassava B. tabaci would be required to draw stronger conclusions about possible differences in Arsenophonus frequency amongst the cassava-colonizing B. tabaci genotypes present in Cameroon. Since the absence of endosymbionts has been linked to greater fitness and virus retention capabilities, however, it will be important to monitor endosymbiont occurrence in future studies. For these reasons, knowledge about prevailing endosymbionts in surveyed whitefly populations is critical for influencing future research on the role of these bacteria in whiteflies and their effect on virus epidemics.This work demonstrated the presence of six mitotypes of Bemisia tabaci, and two distinct clades of Bemisia afer and Trialeurodes vaporariorum on vegetables and cassava in Cameroon. Bemisia tabaci mitotypes identified included MED on vegetables and SSA1-SG1, SSA1-SG2, SSA1-SG5, SSA3, and SSA4 on cassava. The MED mitotype was widely distributed in all sampling regions and is almost certainly the main phytovirus vector in Cameroonian vegetable cropping systems. For the first time, we found the haplogroup SSA-ECA on cassava in Cameroon. This is a concerning new development, as this haplogroup is predominant in regions currently affected by the severe cassava mosaic virus disease (CMD) and cassava brown streak virus disease (CBSD) pandemics in Eastern and Central Africa. The whiteflies in this study were found to be infected with endosymbionts from three different genera (Arsenophonus, Wolbachia, and Rickettsia). None of the insects were infected by Hamiltonella and Cardinium. Moreover, the Rickettsia species, which are implicated in the resistance of insects to insecticides, entomopathogens, and natural enemies, was recorded in all whitefly species at varying levels. MED mitotype whiteflies were predominantly infected with Arsenophonus, which is implicated in the adaptability of whiteflies. These findings add to the knowledge of the diversity of whiteflies and associated endosymbionts, which, when combined, can influence virus epidemics and responses to whitefly control measures especially insecticides.","tokenCount":"5627"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1654711772.json b/data/part_2/1654711772.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..053637608cb12581137760882e755953bc4b245e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1654711772.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"da7705cd7c61c3e3206dcefa89454632","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/02f0513f-5cc0-41df-92b7-a4e4a5b80d37/retrieve","id":"-1971505462"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"7cc619cb-b653-4fbb-b8fc-396e3176c4c8","pagecount":"11","content":"This work is part of the CGIAR Initiative on Sustainable Animal Productivity. We would like to thank all funders who supported this research through their contributions to the CGIAR Trust Fund. CGIAR is a global research partnership for a food-secure future dedicated to transforming food, land, and water systems in a climate crisis.About SAPLING: CGIAR's Sustainable Animal Productivity for Livelihoods, Nutrition and Gender inclusion (SAPLING) is working in seven countries focusing on livestock value chains to package and scale out tried-andtested, as well as new, innovations in livestock health, genetics, feed and market systems. SAPLING aims to demonstrate that improvements in livestock productivity can offer a triple win: generating improved livelihoods and nutritional outcomes; contributing to women's empowerment; and reducing impacts on climate and the environment. Its seven focus countries are Ethiopia,In Ethiopia, the Sheep and Goat Community-Based Breeding Program (CBBP) was introduced in 2009 as an alternative approach to the previously unsuccessful centralized nucleus breeding scheme and crossbreeding program implemented in the low-input system. It aimed to shift towards a more participatory and communitydriven approach to genetic improvement in sheep and goats. Since its inception, the sheep and goat communitybased breeding program has achieved remarkable success in terms of genetic improvement, economic benefit, consumption of animal-source food, and stakeholder participation. This success is a testament to the potential for sustainable livestock development in Ethiopia. The program has not only provided a more viable and communitydriven approach to sheep and goat breeding but has also become a beacon of hope for the future of agriculture in the country. Community-based breeding programs (CBBPs) have then become essential for food security and climate change resistance in Ethiopia, where agriculture drives the economy and millions of jobs. These programs, led by the International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), bring researchers, farmers, and local communities together to enhance animal breeds for the country's specific agroecological circumstances. These programs use traditional knowledge and current science to generate high-yielding, climate-resilient breeds for smallholder farmers. Farmers participate in participatory selection and breeding to generate improved animal breeds that suit local conditions and preferences. The success of the sheep and goat CBBP has experienced significant growth and expansion. The program has successfully extended its reach to a remarkable 155 villages across the country, which is equivalent to 120,000 animals. The current reach has provided valuable insights and demonstrated the program's potential for wider impact. However, there is a need to scale out the program to benefit a larger population. The work has been ongoing for the past three years under the CGIAR Initiative on Sustainable Animal Productivity for Livelihood, Nutrition and Gender inclusion (SAPLING).To deliberate on the possibilities and readiness of scaling up the programs, a workshop was held in Addis Ababa on 27 February 2024. This report delves into the insights gained from the workshop, identifying user needs and bottlenecks and, ultimately, designing an innovation package. The innovation package includes a set of tools, methods, and strategies to propel and sustain the gains made in scaling CBBP in Ethiopia. The goal is to ensure that by 2027, ICARDA/SAPLING and partners will work together in Ethiopia to link the existing 155 CBBPs to 750 production units to create a more efficient market for breeders and link the production units with local consumers and exporters for the commercialization of 972,247 male offsprings per year resulting in the improvement of the livelihood of 110,000 households. This will contribute to enhanced resilience and adoption of integrated technologies and best practices to achieve 25-30% improvement in sheep and goat productivity.o To assess the key challenges to the sustainable scaling of the CBBP and the needed complementary innovative package that could propel its dissemination.o To assess the bottlenecks and potential solutions that could ensure successful implementation and large-scale adoption of the complementary innovation package and hence facilitate the sustainable scaling of the CBBP in Ethiopia.o To assess the readiness of the complementary innovation package and its use.o To examine the scaling readiness of the complementary innovation package.o To agree on the next steps that should be taken to enhance the scaling readiness of the technology package.A welcoming remark was made by Barbara Ann Rischkowsky, who is the research team leader for the Resilient Agrosilvopastoral Systems Program (RASP) and Social Economic and Policy Research (SEP). She provided an overview of the journey of scaling CBBP in Ethiopia. The SAPLING co-lead Mourad Rekik made a brief introduction to SAPLING and its objectives. Participants included representatives from the public and private sectors, national research institutions and universities, CGIAR partners, extension agents, donors, and ICARDA staff who are knowledgeable and involved in the implementation processes of the CBBPs. The workshop facilitators, Ijudai Jasada (lead) and Bezaiet Dessalegn (co-lead) introduced the design component of the workshop.The innovation was introduced by Tesfaye Getachew, who is the research management coordinator for Resilient Agri-Food Systems at ICARDA. Getachew talked about the innovation, the scaling model, the focus regions, and the scaling ambition. The stated ambition was discussed in the plenary to ensure consensus among the different stakeholders and to assess its validity from various perspectives. Alternative views were also aired and discussed for future consideration. Key among the highlights made include:o The importance of branding -the need to also focus on meat quality (including taste) and not just quantity to be made available. Opportunities to target high-end markets in major cities like Addis Ababa could offer more sustainable market outlets. This will require increased attention to securing quality feed for the animals and reducing the cost of production and marketing (including transportation o Proper bundling of innovations across all CBBPs -the importance of policy engagement to ensure the inclusion of the smart pack in the national extension program and avoid differences in outreach across the regions. This will require investment in building the capacity of all actors involved in the process. Comment by Berhanu Belay, ICARDA.o Resource mobilization -to support the vast coverage envisioned in the stated ambition. The need for expanding the donor base and establishing effective partnerships with donors was emphasized. Comment by Biruktayit Assefa, World Bank.o Sustainable inclusion -ensuring equitable access and control over production and marketing benefits requires consistent efforts against cultural and other norms embedded in institutional structures. However, such gender transformative approaches require time and conscious investment to initiate and sensitize norm gatekeepers to influence change. Comment by Meseret Tsige, ICARDA, gender expert.o Others highlighted the need for -an improved input market and an effective and efficient extension system, which currently suffers from inadequate funding and high staff turnover (district and regional levels), which hinders the smooth transfer of knowledge, identifying alternative knowledge campaign partners to support scaling, organizing production units into larger/mega cooperatives, improvement in the effective implementation of laws and regulations that are in place. The community-based breeding program in Ethiopia represents a promising avenue for improving livestock productivity and resilience while promoting community involvement and empowerment. Many communities across the country currently adopt it, and it is being integrated into government extension systems (in some areas of the country) and even linked with university curriculums. However, more needs to be done to link the CBBPs with effective production units and market outlets to ensure its sustainable and large-scale dissemination. The latter was translated into a scaling ambition, which guided the discussions and assessments conducted in this exercise.The workshop allowed the core innovation team to assess the challenges in -and opportunities for -achieving the set ambition from the perspective of the different stakeholders represented. The team, along with their partners, were able to gauge the level of readiness of proposed solutions that need to be in place to achieve set targets and identify the ones that will require further investment and those that are readily available for use. The team will follow up with the respective group leaders to further explore and understand in greater detail the mechanisms for putting proposed solutions into action, the evidence for those that have been tested and documented, etc. ","tokenCount":"1326"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1668254398.json b/data/part_2/1668254398.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bd3a8ac8f77873e63df9f626544c89231deba6f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1668254398.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"9131520b60031a736499bfc7cc43b056","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e4c61310-b61a-4bee-ac9b-bbe5fc2d1e93/retrieve","id":"-1516236560"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"8a7036a3-f259-4a28-bc82-f2175ef2c6aa","pagecount":"26","content":"The International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) works for better lives through livestock in developing countries. ILRI is co-hosted by Kenya and Ethiopia, has 14 offices across Asia and Africa. ILRI is one of the CGIAR research centres, a global research partnership for a food-secure future. CGIAR science is dedicated to reducing poverty, enhancing food and nutrition security, and improving natural resources and ecosystem services. Its research is carried out by 15 CGIAR centres in close collaboration with hundreds of partners, including national and regional research institutes, civil society organizations, academia, development organizations and the private sector.Africa RISING is a USAID funded program that operates in six African counties (Mali, Ghana, Tanzania, Malawi, Zambia and Ethiopia). The program aims to contribute to Feed the Future goals of reducing hunger, poverty and under-nutrition by delivering high quality research outputs that are relevant to these goals. In Ethiopia, the main aim of the project is to identify and validate solutions to the problems experienced by small-holder crop-livestock farmers. Africa RISING takes an integrated approach to strengthen farming systems. It conducts participatory research that identifies technologies and management practices that work for farmers and take account of contextual issues like markets for inputs and outputs, community and other institutions and policy environments that influence farm households.AICCRA is a three years (2021)(2022)(2023) project that operates in six African countries (Ethiopia, Kenya, Zambia, Senegal, Mali and Ghana. The project is supported by a grant from the International Development Association (IDA) of the World Bank and enhances research and capacity-building activities by CGIAR and its partners. AICCRA in Ethiopia aims to strengthen the capacity of targeted national partners and stakeholders of CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) East Africa to access and implement at scale validated climate-smart agriculture technologies, climate information services, and climate-informed digital ag-advisories to build the resilience of agri-food systems. The AICCRA project in Ethiopia has eight research activities. Livestock feed and forage options value chain contributes to four of the eight activities, which include capacity building to support implementation of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) technology packages; identification of climate-and gender and social inclusion-smartness of CSA packages; prioritization and awareness increase of best-bet CSA options and approaches for key value chains; and integration of climate-smart options and tailored CSI advisory systems for specific value chains.In line with this, ILRI contracted a consultant to undertake media and communications related activities including media assessment, training of radio journalists on livestock feed and forage innovations and also impact assessment. As part of this, the consultant travelled to three regions of Ethiopia (Amhara, Oromia and SNNPR) and made an assessment to identify appropriate regional radio stations. Following the assessment three media institutions are identified in the three regions and a partnership agreement was signed between ILRI and the media institutions to produce and broadcast radio programs on livestock feed and forage innovations. A two day media training workshop on climate smart feed and forage innovations were organized in Addis Ababa before starting working on the radio program production.-To increase the awareness of journalists on various livestock feed and forage innovations suitable for the Ethiopian highland mixed farming systems.-To enable journalists, appreciate the importance of feed and forage innovations for livestock development.-To help journalists identify issues / topics and develop contents that would help them produce and broadcast radio programs focusing on livestock related issues in general and feed and forage innovations.After the signing of partnership agreement with the identified media institutions, the consultant conducted discussions with the identified media institutions heads and ILRI / Africa RISING -AICCRA team to identify relevant training participants. Accordingly, the consultant in collaboration with the media institution identified 4 participants from each region (Head of the media institution, Editor and two radio program producers). In total 12 participants from the three regions attended the training workshop.The initial assessment report from the three regions; Amhara / Debre Birhan, Oromia/Bale and SNNPR/ Hossaenna showed that journalists' awareness on livestock feed and forage innovation is very limited.Many of them also responded that they have never produced stand-alone programs on both livestock and livestock feed and forage technologies. Thus, they requested an awareness raising training for them to understand the sector very well. In line with that, a two-day media training workshop on climate smart livestock feed and forage innovations was designed as follows:• Day One: Livestock production and feed and forage sources in Ethiopia; cultivated forage production and utilization in the Ethiopian highlands; fodder trees and shrubs in the Ethiopian highlands: service and product functions; post-harvest feed utilization; forage seed business and scaling; and issue identification and content development for the radio programs.• Day Two: Field visit to one of the project implementation areas, Debre Birhan / Amhara region.The training was jointly delivered by Africa RISING/AICCRA team and the consultant. The first day training combines presentation and a documentary film show entitled \"improved livestock feeding yields positive results for Ethiopian's farmers\". At the end of the first day, a Telegram group was created where all presentations and relevant materials were shared with the training participants/journalists.On the second day, the training workshop participants also visited one of the Africa RISING project implementation areas in Debre Birhan, Amhara region.The training workshop started with a brief welcoming remark by Kindu Mekonnen (Dr) who is the leader for the Africa RISING project in Ethiopia. In his welcoming remark, he mentioned that the training workshop on climate -smart livestock feed and forage innovations is supported by Africa Research in Sustainable Intensification for the Next Generation (Africa RISING) and Accelerating Impacts of CGIAR Climate Research for Africa (AICCRA). He added that, Africa RISING is a research-for-development project supported by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The program is working in six African countries, including Ethiopia. In the last 10 years, Africa RISING has been working in four regions of Ethiopia (Amhara, Oromia, Tigray, and SNNPR).Dr. Kindu also noted that in the first five years of the project (phase one), Africa RISING conducted a series of action research to evaluate different technologies on crops, livestock, and natural resources. In the second phase of the project implementation period, Africa RISING has been promoting and scaling technologies to different areas that were tested and validated in the first phase of the project. Currently, the number of woredas where the technologies scaled have increased from Regarding the Accelerating Impacts of CGIAR Climate Research for Africa (AICCRA), Dr. Kindu mentioned that the project is supported by World Bank and works in six African countries, including Ethiopia. The project is implemented in three regions in Ethiopia: Amhara, Oromia, and SNNPR. As he concludes his remarks, he reminded that the two projects have organized and supported the media training workshop on climate-smart livestock feed and forage innovations to create the awareness of the media personnel on various feed and forage innovations suitable for Ethiopian highland mixed farming systems, and to encourage journalists to produce and broadcast radio programs on feed and forage innovations. He finally noted that the two projects have targeted to reach a minimum of 10,000 beneficiaries through radio programs.Setting the scene: livestock production and feed resources in ethiopiaDr. Getnet started his presentation by highlighting some facts about the role of Livestock in the livelihood of most Ethiopian farmers and pastoralists. Ethiopia has the highest livestock population in Africa. Livestock provides food for the family, ploughing the land for crop production and provides manure. They are the source of fuel to cook, a source of income and social prestige, and transport goods and for human beings, they are the source of skin for clothing and shoe.Dr. Getnet also stated that the livestock sector contributes about 47% of the Agricultural GDP of the country.According to the presentation, livestock feed scarcity, genotype (breed); animal health; traditional management practices, and marketing are major challenges to the livestock sector in the country. Dr.Getnet also highlighted major feed sources available in the country.Increase efficient use of available feed resources, develop or adopt the successful practices and demonstrate and scale up / out of good practices are the possible strategies to alleviate feed problems in the country, He added. It was also noted that improved feeding is very crucial to transform livestock productivity. However, availing adequate and quality feed remains as a major issue. Forage crops are the most appropriate feed source in most parts of the farming system in Ethiopia.Dr. Getnet also highlighted some of the comparative advantages of forage crops which include:-Farmers can produce around their vicinity.-Productive and high in quality.-Could be integrated with Natural Resource Management (NRM) practices and many other options -multiple functions.-Diversified species and means of production.-Relatively cheaper.-Positive contribution to climate change -carbon sequestration.About available forage production packages, Dr. Getnet stated that many varieties/species are registered and recommended, productive and profitable agronomic practices are available, integration methods developed, major quality parameters are known and feeding strategies are available.He also said that intensification is a must to increase productivity due to the rapid changes in population, production practices, and investment. Demand for improved forage crops is increasing but still adoption is very low. This is because the dominant livestock production practice is still subsistence, scarcity of land, scarcity of seed and planting materials, and also traditional production practice.Finally, Dr. Getnet completed his presentation by recommending the following forage promotion approaches:1. Linking forage production to market-oriented livestock systems 2. Linking forage production to the current farming practice, NRM, marginal lands, etc.3. Strong extension system, support, and promotion 4. Establish efficient input/output supply and marketing systemsAberra started his presentation by highlighting feed shortage as the main constraint for livestock production in the country. Major feed resources are inadequate and poor in quality. And cultivated forage crops are potential options to increase feed availability and quality and transform livestock production.He indicated that cultivated forages are grasses, herbaceous legumes, shrubs/tree legumes, annuals, and perennials. They are easily accessible and affordable, high biomass yield, some are high-quality feed sources, and others are also very good sources of food for human beings and used as sources of firewood. They also provide ecosystem services, play a key role in integrated pest management initiatives, and are also used as cash crops.Abera also discussed the basic practices of cultivating forage crops, which are:A. Aberra also touched up on the on-farm evaluation of the performance of some selected forage varieties and on-farm evaluation of animal responses to some selected forage varieties as indicated below (Bezabih et al, 2017).Dr. Kindu started his presentation with fodder trees and shrubs. According to him, they are trees and shrubs that serve as important supplementary feed sources for livestock on top of providing various product and service functions in different agro ecologies/ farming systems of Africa and other continents.Leguminous and nonleguminous, fast-growing and slow-growing, exotic and indigenous, highland, mid-land, and low land, and palatable and less palatable are types of fodder trees, He added.He also highlighted the difference between Leguminous trees and shrubs and non leguminous trees and shrubs. Leguminous trees and shrubs are trees and shrubs that have high value in terms of biological, ecological, and agronomic contributions. They are also legumes that fix atmospheric nitrogen from the atmosphere and add to the system through symbiotic associations with nitrogenfixing rhizobia. Non leguminous trees and shrubs on the other hand mean trees and shrubs that don't fix and add nitrogen to the system. Some trees and shrubs scavenge nutrients and recycle nutrients into the system.Dr. Kindu also presented and discussed a number of potential fodder trees across different agro ecologies in the country.He also highlighted the characteristics of tree lucerne, one of the most adaptable fodder tree and shrub species in the highlands of Ethiopia. According to him, tree lucerne is one of the fewest leguminous and fast-growing exotic species adaptable in high-altitude areas. Africa RISING project has managed to undertake action research on tree lucerne with more than 250 farmers in Amhara, Tigray, Oromia, and SNNP regions. The tree is native to Spain and exotic species to Australia, Ethiopia, South Africa, Rwanda, and New Zealand, He added.He also discussed to the training participants the service and product functions, growing ecology, establishment, management, and utilization of tree lucerne.Dr. Kindu concluded his presentation by delivering important tips about tree lucerne. He noted that tree lucerne plays an important role in bridging seasonal feed shortages and serves as a protein supplement to enhance the feeding value of local feed resources. Survival and productivity of tree lucerne can be improved if we protect planted seedlings from browsing, mulch during dry periods, practice clean spot weeding, and apply organic fertilizers at early growing periods of the plant (Mekonnen et al, 2019 andMekonnen et al, 2021) Scientific name Common/local name Geography/agroecologyDr. Melkamu started his presentation by highlighting some facts and figures on feed. Feed is the main input in livestock production and accounts for 40-70% of the total cost of production. Feed resources are limited and prices are increasing. Traditional feeding practices often incur large postharvest feed losses.According to Dr. Melkamu, feed losses start at harvest, continues during preservation practices, storage, feeding, and unbalanced rations. The economic and health implications of harvest and postharvest losses include increased feeding costs, the increased gap between feed demand and supply at the household level, fungal contaminations, human and animal health impacts, and labour and gender issues, He added. He also stated that improved feeding troughs and improved sheds are practical solutions for harvest and post-harvest losses. eases animal handling, and cleans barns. Improved sheds minimize contamination and quality loss. He also added that the use of improved feed stores and feeding troughs saves 30-50% of feed and reduces 10-20% of labour demand for feeding.Dr. Melkamu also highlighted other good practices in the area, including chopping and mixing before feeding, moistening dried residues with salt solution, preservation of excess feeds following recommended procedures, and harvesting crops before losing quality. As he concluded his presentation, as a key takeaways Dr. Melamu conveyed that crop residues constitute about half of the diet of ruminants in the Ethiopian highlands, feed sheds and feeding troughs play an important role in optimally using such dried, and in terms of cost it is worth investing.Dr. Million began his presentation by describing current challenges of producing forage seeds, separating them as technical challenges and market/institutional challenges. The technical challenges include, some forage such as grass are perineal and could be planted recurrently once farmers get the initial seed and Some seeds area easy to produce, hence, farmers save their own seeds. Finally, Dr.Million highlighted the role of media in forage seed sector and forage innovations scaling.On forage seeds, media could play a great role by creating space for deliberation among seed actors, advocating for transition from informal to formal systems and creating awareness creation on forage seed issues. On scaling, awareness is one critical ingredient of scaling scan. Knowledge is also another component hence, regular coverage of feed and forage issues on media would enhance their scalingHailemariam began his presentation with the question on why limited media coverage on livestockrelated issues in the country? Participants shared their views and mentioned that the government does not give enough attention to the livestock sector, due to journalist's limited awareness of livestock-related areas and low attention to the sector, limited interest in livestock experts to use/engage the media as an important stockholder. They also suggested the need to do further research to understand why of limited media coverage in the country.Hailemariam noted that mass media/ Radio is considered the most effective means to reach rural communities and to create awareness about new or existing technologies and practices. Mostly, agricultural and livestock development programs in developing countries largely succeed depending on the extent to which the media/Radio are engaged/used.Despite having Africa's largest livestock population, Ethiopia has not realized the full benefits of the sector, he said. Among the challenges includes the availability of the feed itself and also the low quality associated with feed and forage management. Under the Africa RISING projects, integrated feed and forage development showed promising results in improving Ethiopia's livestock feed system. However, many farmers have limited awareness of these feed and forage innovations. Therefore, journalists need to promote the livestock feed and forage innovations and make farmers aware of the benefits through Radio programs, He added.The presenter also discussed the media assessment which was conducted in three regions (Amhara / Debre Birhan, Oromia / Bale, and SNNPR / Hossaenna) to identify appropriate radio stations to produce and broadcast livestock feed and forage innovation-related radio programs. Based on the assessment, Debre Birhan Fana FM 94.0, Bale OBN FM 96.5, and SNNP radio and TV agency, Hossaenna FM 95.3 radio stations were identified. Following that, a partnership agreement was signed between the media and ILRI. This journalist training workshop is part of the agreement signed to capacitate media professionals so that they produce and broadcast radio programs focusing on livestock feed and forage innovations, He added.Another important topic discussed was radio issue/topic identification and content development. As opposed to top-down approaches in program production cycles, participants were given the opportunity to identify radio program issues/topics and contents to be produced and broadcast in each regional radio station. Accordingly, 10 issues were identified and discussed in each group. Finally, each group presented the identified issues in a plenary session and agreed to continue working on the content development for day two while they visit Africa RISING/AICCRA projects implementation areas.Q1: As stated, the livestock sector contributes about 47% of the GDP of the country. But the attention of the government given to the sector is low. What is the reason behind it?A1: The attention given to the livestock sector is limited. One of the reasons, may be investment is done on agriculture/crops the output is seen within a short period of time. On the other hand, when one invests in livestock it will be difficult to see the output within a short period of time. That may be the reason behind it, however, attention should be given to the livestock sector and we all should work together for this to happen.Q2: How can we give concentrate feeds to animals? Is there any idea /calculation?A: 2 With regard to concentrate feeds, we should give it to animals based on their production capacity.For example, we give a high amount of concentrate feed to the cow which gives 10 litres of milk per day, and less amount of concentrate feed for the cow which gives 5 litre of milk per day. We will not give an equal amount of concentrate feed for all cows/cattle.Q3: There are people, who use hormones to fatten their animals, if we eat the meat of this animal will there be any side effects on us?A: 3 With regard to hormones, giving hormones to fatten cattle is illegal and when you see such activity you should inform to concerned government bodies. Eating hormone-fatten animal meat has a negative impact on health, one of it is obesity.Q: 4 Is seed available for all cultivated forage innovations for all farmers?A:4 With regard to seed availability, during the first phase of the implementation period, we had been conducting participatory research that identifies technologies and management practices, and then in the second phase of the project implementation period, in collaboration with partners, we are working on scaling up the technologies to different areas. Of course, there are problems with seed availability but private seed producers are coming and we will support these private seed producers, we are also supporting farmers to produce seed by themselves.Q: 5 How can we scale up all the cultivated feed and forage technologies since we have limited land resources?A: 5 To overcome the challenges with the limited land resources we can use different options, like planting cultivated feed and forage innovations around our garden, at the entrance of our house, etc.Q: 6 Any information about poisonous plants which killed animals when they eat them?A: 6 Animals easily identify poisonous plants and most of the time they do not eat these poisonous plants. But we treat these poisonous plants for example through drying or boiling. When we dry or boil them they will not be poisonous. However, we recommend only non-poisonous feed sources and forage plants.Q: 7 Termite is one reason for feed loss during storage, how can we prevent this problem?A: 7 Yes termites are problems, but when we build our feed troughs we always should consider termites. We can use live poles or concrete, or we can cover the lower tip of the pole with plastic.Q: 8 When we feed cattle, which one is advisable? Feeding the dry or green grass /feed?A: 8 Most of the time livestock feeds loose nutrients during drying. But there are also cases when feeding dry feed is advisable. When we prepare dry feed we should prevent it from direct sunlight exposure, which will help the feed to remain full of nutrients.On the second day the training workshop participants travelled to Debre Berhan, which is the Africa RISING/AICCRA projects implementation area in Amhara region. The objective of the visit was to share the experiences of a farmer who has been implementing livestock feed and forage technologies.Gebeyehu Tadesse, a farmer living in Debre Birhan area, Angolela Kebele provided an explanation on how he is using the livestock feed and forage innovations to improve his livelihood. The farmer shared his testimonies to journalists on how engaging in livestock feed and forage innovations have changed his family significantly. The journalists were glad to visit and gain experience on what is going on at the ground level. They said that they saw everything that experts presented theoretically. They also interviewed the farmer to produce and broadcast his success story through their radio programs.After the field visit, participants continued discussing the draft contents developed during the first day and agreed to work on the following contents. With Africa RISING site coordinators• What is Africa RISING, since when has it been operational in the area?• Which of the feed and forage innovations have been experimented in the area?• Which of the feed and forage innovations are under a scaling stage?• What are some of the success stories from beneficiary farmers?• What are their messages to farmers on the adoption of feed and forage innovations?• What are their messages to farmers on the utilization of feed and forage innovations?✓ The joint Africa RISING and AICCRA supported improved and climate-smart livestock feed and forage innovations that have been found promising to narrow feed demand and supply gaps. ✓ What are some of the expert advice that farmers need to know in using cultivated forages?✓ What is expected from different actors' farmers, farmer organizations, extension, research, and political leadership?At the end of the field visit participants were asked to give comments on the training. They said that the training was so helpful and important to understand the livestock sector in general and in feed and forage innovations in particular. They said the livestock population we have is large but the benefit we got from the sector is limited. They recognized the low level of attention given by the media and other stakeholders. They commit to cover livestock-related areas. They promised to give enough media coverage to the livestock sector. Debre Birhan Fana FM head said that he will push the higher media management to have a weekly radio program on his station even without expecting external support.They have also requested livestock experts to work closely with the media and engage the media as an important partner.No ","tokenCount":"3908"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1668913061.json b/data/part_2/1668913061.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..814f880c184128a41817fadc5667a3adc4c35016 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1668913061.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"bcf770659cc940df5ad7c63af735ce57","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/512745e1-11a6-4817-a241-c37f66026ca8/retrieve","id":"666432165"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"573f3ed1-4bc1-4f57-88aa-514e824eaa1e","pagecount":"89","content":"Cet Agrodok s'adresse aux personnes désireuses de se lancer dans la production à petite échelle de produits laitiers dans les pays en voie de développement. La brochure a pour but d'initier le lecteur à des techniques simples de production laitière à petite échelle et de donner un aperçu des possibilités offertes par la fabrication du fromage comme source de revenu. Comme de nombreuses connaissances sur la préparation des produits laitiers sont souvent disponibles au niveau local, il est conseillé de commencer par se familiariser avec ces méthodes. Il est recommandé aussi de ne pas introduire de produits laitiers occidentaux quand ce n'est pas nécessaire.Les auteurs ont utilisé les informations recueillies auprès de J.C.T. van den Berg de l'Université d'Agriculture de Wageningen, qui possède une longue expérience dans la préparation des produits laitiers au niveau industriel sous les tropiques. Les recettes données dans cet Agrodok sont tirées de plusieurs ouvrages. Nous vous serions reconnaissants de bien vouloir nous écrire pour nous faire part de vos expériences avec ces recettes ou avec toute autre recette locale.Cette sixième édition inclut les nouvelles connaissances techniques issues de la recherche sur les produits laitiers et les expériences acquises par les services de vulgarisation. Il est cependant tout à fait impossible de couvrir l'ensemble des savoirs sur les produits laitiers. Il faudrait que le lecteur possède des connaissances de base en chimie, physique et microbiologie laitière et que les fermes soient en mesure de respecter des conditions particulières d'hygiène et de manipulation du lait. Il faut donc considérer cette brochure comme une initiation. Les lecteurs intéressés pourront élargir leurs connaissances en consultant des ouvrages plus spécifiques et en suivant des formations sur d'importantes méthodes de fabrication de produits laitiers.1 IntroductionSous les tropiques, les gens élèvent du bétail pour diverses raisons : pour la force de travail des animaux, leur viande, leur laine, leurs poils, leur peau et leurs excréments qui peuvent servir de combustible une fois séchés. Le lait n'est souvent qu'un produit secondaire alors qu'il est en fait une précieuse denrée alimentaire. L'élevage d'animaux laitiers permet aussi de faire des économies car la vente de bétail peut fournir de l'argent en cas de besoin. Le bétail est donc une sorte d'assurance contre les maladies et les mauvaises récoltes.Ce n'est pas par hasard que l'on élève certains animaux produisant un certain type de lait dans une région donnée. Cela s'explique par : les conditions climatiques, les maladies locales prévalentes, le fourrage disponible, le niveau de prise de risques acceptable pour le propriétaire, les tâches supplémentaires attribuées à l'animal, la religion, les traditions et la préférence pour certains produits issus des animauxx.L'élevage d'animaux laitiers conduit souvent à un surplus de lait. Si, dans une région donnée, la production laitière est supérieure à sa consommation, le surplus peut être vendu sur le marché ou être transformé pour ne pas être gaspillé. Si la quantité de lait à transformer est faible (moins de 100 litres à chaque fois), cette activité est considérée être à petite échelle. C'est de cette activité de transformation du lait à petite échelle et avec des ustensiles simples dont traite cet Agrodok.? La plupart des produits dérivés du lait se conservent plus longtemps que le lait : il n'est donc pas nécessaire de consommer tout le lait immédiatement. ? La demande en lait frais est limitée : les laitages sont souvent plus appréciés. ? Lorsque la quantité de lait frais vendue quotidiennement est limitée, il est plus avantageux de transformer le lait en produits moins périssables, de les conserver pour les vendre plus tard en plus grandes quantités. ? Lorsqu'il n'y a pas dans le voisinage de marché pour écouler le lait frais, les produits conservés peuvent être vendus sur des marchés plus éloignés. ? On peut obtenir un gain financier plus important.Il faut savoir en outre que de nombreux groupes de population en Asie et y en Afrique ne peuvent pas, ou difficilement, consommer de lait à cause de ce qu'on appelle l'intolérance au lactose : le corps n'assimile pas, ou difficilement, le sucre (lactose) contenu dans le lait. Le lait ne peut être digéré qu'en petites quantités (pas plus de 200 ml à la fois) alors que les produits laitiers dans lesquels le sucre a été partiellement transformé (fromage, yaourt, babeurre) ne posent guère de problèmes digestifs.Avant de traiter le surplus de lait, il faut se demander si c'est rentable. Le traitement n'est pas toujours facile et il peut y avoir des pertes. Par exemple, le petit-lait, qui est l'un des résidus de la fabrication du fromage, contient de nombreux nutriments de valeur. S'il n'est pas utilisé, une partie importante des qualités du lait est perdue. De plus, une détérioration de la qualité du lait pendant le traitement est possible : le lait peut tourner. Ce n'est que lorsque le lait est bu immédiatement que l'on peut être sûr qu'il possède encore toutes ses qualités.Le traitement du lait à petite échelle est la transformation de petites quantités de lait (jusqu'à 100 litres) avec des ustensiles simples et un minimum de matériel spécial. Sous les tropiques, le traitement du lait pose parfois des problèmes à cause des températures élevées et de la forte humidité relative. Ces conditions climatiques influent sur le choix des laitages à fabriquer et sur leur durée de conservation. Il faut donc en tenir compte.Les hautes températures sont néfastes à la fabrication du fromage, surtout pendant la maturation. Les hautes températures favorisent la multiplication des bactéries. Le lactose tourne à l'acide et provoque le caillage du lait. Les bactéries de l'acide lactique responsables de la tourne ne sont pas dangereuses pour l'homme.Le nettoyage et la stérilisation des ustentiles et du matériel sont de première importance. C'est pourquoi toutes les personnes qui manipulent le lait doivent toujours veiller à respecter une bonne hygiène. Le manque de propreté permet aux bactéries de s'introduire dans le lait, ce qui le fait tourner et réduit sa durée de conservation. La prévention de la contamination est souvent difficile lorsque le lait est collecté à divers endroits pour être transformé dans une seule usine. Même une toute petite quantité de lait infecté peut contaminer tout le reste.Un autre problème est le manque de matériel. Il faut essayer de s'accommoder d'un matériel simple car il est souvent difficile d'acheter du matériel pour le traitement du lait à petite échelle. Comme l'électricité n'est généralement pas disponible, on ne peut utiliser de matériel électrique (pour le refroidissement par exemple), à moins d'installer un générateur. Sous les tropiques, les additifs, comme la présure pour la fabrication du fromage, sont souvent difficiles à se procurer.Figure 2 : Les brebis fournissent du lait, de la viande, de la laine, de la peau, de la fourrure et du fumier Les chapitres suivants traitent de l'importance du lait dans l'alimentation ainsi que des mesures d'hygiène et des méthodes de transformation du lait.La seconde partie de l'ouvrage donnent des règles générales sur le chauffage, le refroidissement, la fermentation et sur la fabrication de la crème, du beurre, du beurre clarifié, des produits laitiers acides et du fromage.Le lait contient des substances essentielles à l'être humain : protéines, hydrates de carbone, matières grasses, eau, toutes vitamines B, vitamines A et D, calcium et phosphore. Il fournit aussi de l'énergie.Une importante protéine du lait est la caséine qui constitue bien souvent 80% de la protéine du lait. C'est ce qui est à la base de la fabrication du fromage. La caséine est associée au phosphate de calcium, ce qui explique pourquoi le lait contient relativement beaucoup de ce sel, une substance nutritive extrêmement importante pour les humains et les animaux.Outre la caséine, le lait contient des protéines de petit-lait (20 % de la protéine du lait). Les protéines du petit-lait restent généralement dans le petit-lait et ne sont pas incorporées dans le fromage. Ces protéines (globulines et albumines) ont une très grande valeur nutritive.La protéine du lait est de bonne qualité, c'est-à-dire qu'elle peut être en grande partie utilisée pour la construction des protéines du corps. Les protéines des autres denrées alimentaires complètent son action.Combiné dans un même repas avec des céréales, des pommes de terre, de la viande, des oeufs ou des noix, le lait fournit au corps un pourcentage plus élevé de protéines.Outre le lait, d'autres sources de protéines animales (poisson, viande) et de protéines végétales (céréales, cosses) sont également importantes pour la construction des protéines du corps. Les protéines sont nécessaires à la croissance, au remplacement des protéines usées et à la production des composants nécessaires à l'organisme.Le lactose est un hydrate de carbone nécessaire au fonctionnement du corps humain. Le corps brûle des hydrates de carbone comme un four brûle du bois. Cette combustion libère de l'énergie que le corps utilise pour exercer toutes sortes d'activités.Les matières grasses du lait se présentent sous forme de globules, plus légers que les autres composants du lait. Les globules se rassemblent à la surface du lait de vache laissé au repos et forment une couche de crème. Il se forme également un peu de crème sur le lait de bufflesse laissé au repos mais pas sur les autres sortes de lait (brebis, chèvre). Dans ce cas, il faut procéder mécaniquement à la séparation de la crème et du lait. Les matières grasses du lait sont faciles à digérer. Le corps les utilise comme combustible ou les met en réserve. La composition diffère entre le lait de femme, de vache, de bufflesse, de chèvre, de brebis, de chamelle, de guenon et de lama, comme indiqué dans le tableau suivant. Le lait de bufflesse caille plus vite que celui de vache. Si la préparation n'est pas adaptée, le fromage de lait de bufflesse mûrit plus lentement et a une consistance plus sèche que le fromage de lait de vache. Le lait de chèvre a parfois une saveur déplaisante qui peut être évitée en faisant bouillir le lait immédiatement après la traite. Le goût du lait peut varier en fonction des chèvres ou des races de chèvres.Le lait de vache constitue 91% de la production mondiale de lait et les laits de bufflesse, de chèvre et de brebis respectivement 5,9%, 1,6% et 1,7%. Malgré les énormes différences régionales, on peut dire que les laits de vache et de bufflesse sont généralement préférés pour la consommation directe à ceux de chèvre et de brebis, ce à cause de leur goût plus neutre.Les laits de chèvre et de brebis sont plus appréciés pour la fabrication des fromages et des laitages aigres (surtout celui de brebis). Le lait maternel est parfaitement adapté aux besoins de l'enfant et contient certaines substances qui le protègent contre les maladies infectieuses. Il contient en quantité suffisante les nutriments nécessaires à l'enfant (sauf le fer et la vitamine C). A la naissance, l'enfant dispose d'une réserve de fer emmagasinée dans son foie. Cette réserve s'épuise en 6 mois environ.Une alimentation supplémentaire n'est nécessaire qu'après 3 mois, lorsque le lait maternel ne suffit plus à fournir tous les nutriments indispensables. Un supplément en vitamine C (jus de fruit, fruits écrasés) est nécessaire et un supplément en produits riches en énergie est souhaitable. L'ajout de petites quantités de lait en poudre à la nourriture écrasée permet d'améliorer considérablement la valeur nutritive d'un repas (surtout en protéine). Il est préférable de dépenser son argent pour des produits de première nécessité plutôt que pour de la nourriture artificielle, à moins que ce ne soit strictement nécessaire. Si un nourrisson ne supporte pas le lait, il faut lui donner des laitages ne contenant pas de lactose. C'est le cas de l'intolérance congénitale au lactose ; nous allons l'examiner maintenant plus en détail.On parle d'intolérance au lactose lorsque le corps ne peut pas, ou difficilement, digérer le lactose (sucre de lait) par manque de lactase, l'enzyme nécessaire à la digestion du lactose. Il existe diverses formes d'intolérance au lactose chez les enfants : ? L'intolérance congénitale : le nourrisson ne supporte pas le lait car son organisme ne dispose pas de lactase, nécessaire à la scission du lactose en glucose et galactose. ? L'intolérance des enfants (2-5 ans) : une forte baisse d'activité de la lactase se produit vers deux ans pouvant provoquer des problèmes de déficience à l'âge de 4-5 ans. La consommation de petites quantités de lait (un verre à la fois) ne pose généralement pas de problèmes. On s'évitera bien des soucis en donnant aux enfants des laitages fermentés dans lesquels le lactose a été partiellement transformé (fromage, yaourt, babeurre). ? L'intolérance due à une maladie intestinale et à la malnutrition, en particulier chez les nourrissons tout-petits. L'activité de la lactase est temporairement réduite. Il faut pendant quelque temps donner des laitages qui ne contiennent pas de lactose. Le fromage et les produits fermentés dans lesquels le lactose a été transformé (yaourt) conviennent également.La consommation de lait ne dépend pas seulement de l'intolérance au lactose mais aussi d'autres facteurs que nous abordons ici.On appelle \"régime alimentaire\" la façon dont les gens se nourrissent ainsi que les denrées alimentaires qu'ils utilisent. Le régime alimentaire dépend en grande partie des traditions et de la religion, de la situation économique, de la place dans la société et des possibilités offertes par l'environnement naturel. Il n'est pas surprenant que chaque groupe de population ait son propre type de régime alimentaire. Tout examen du régime alimentaire humain doit inclure celui de la consommation de lait et de laitages.Voici comment les facteurs mentionnés ci-dessus peuvent influer sur la consommation de lait et laitages : ? En Inde, la vache est un animal sacré : il est impossible de s'y procurer la présure nécessaire à la fabrication du fromage car elle est extraite de l'estomac de veau (caillette). ? L'achat de lait et de laitages nécessite de l'argent. ? Dans les régions à forte densité démographique, toutes les terres disponibles sont utilisées pour les cultures à grosses récoltes ou destinées à la consommation immédiate ; Il ne reste alors plus guère de place pour l'élevage. Voyons maintenant comment les micro-organismes attaquent le lait. Nous préciserons ensuite les précautions à prendre pour minimiser l'influence de ces facteurs et les règles à suivre en matière de nettoyage et de stérilisation.Les bactéries, levures et moisissures sont des micro-organismes.Les micro-organismes sont minuscules et invisibles à l'oeil nu. Il s'en trouve partout, dans l'air, l'eau et le sol ainsi que dans la nourriture et le lait. En général, les micro-organismes se multiplient très rapidement.Le lait contenu dans le pis d'un animal sain en est dépourvu. Le lait peut être contaminé par des micro-organismes nocifs au cours de la traite, de la manutention, du transport et du stockage. Les microorganismes contaminants peuvent provenir de la peau de l'animal, des mains du trayeur, des instruments de traite ou même de l'air.La plupart des micro-organismes sont inoffensifs mais certains sont susceptibles de provoquer des maladies comme la salmonellose, la dysenterie, la tuberculose (chez l'homme et l'animal), la diphtérie et la scarlatine. Ces micro-organismes sont appelés bactéries pathogèniques. Certaines maladies se transmettent par manque d'hygiène, d'homme à homme et d'animal à homme. Voir tableau 5. Le nettoyage consiste à enlever la saleté, les restes de nourriture et les micro-organismes qui se trouvent à la surface du matériel. Les casseroles, les pots, le matériel de traite et les ustensiles doivent être nettoyés aussitôt après l'usage. Une solution de soude (carbonate de sodium) dans de l'eau chaude est un excellent détergent. Il faut désinfecter le matériel aussitôt après l'usage pour tuer les microorganismes nuisibles qui restent. On peut utiliser une solution de chlore telle que l'eau de Javel (hypochlorite de sodium). Les instruments bien nettoyés sont presque stériles, à l'exception de quelques bactéries. En les conservant secs, ils seront préservés des bactéries. Il n'est alors pas nécessaire de les désinfecter. Le lait se conserve plus longtemps lorsqu'il a été traité. Vous pouvez le conserver plus longtemps si vous maîtriser le développement des micro-organismes. Les méthodes de traitement choisies déterminent la durée de conservation du lait et des laitages. Il est important de respecter les règles suivantes lors de la production, de la conservation et du traitement.? Lavez-vous toujours bien les mains et ne touchez jamais le lait.? Nettoyez et désinfectez tout le matériel utilisé.? Veillez à ce qu'aucune saleté ou insecte ne s'introduise dans le lait.? N'utilisez pas d'ustensiles en cuivre si possible (le cuivre donne un goût désagréable au beurre et au lait). ? N'exposez pas le lait à la lumière et au soleil, conservez-le dans un endroit sombre. ? Utilisez un thermomètre. ? Assurez-vous que le lait de consommation a été bouilli ou pasteurisé. ? Ne conservez jamais de lait cru (n'ayant pas été chauffé) s'il n'a pas été refroidi immédiatement à moins de 4°C. ? Ne buvez jamais de lait cru car il peut contenir des bactéries pathogéniques transportant notamment la tuberculose et la salmonelle.Nous présentons dans ce chapitre les méthodes de traitement qui suivent : ? pasteurisation ; ? refroidissement ; ? acidification ; ? fabrication de la crème.Le chauffage et le refroidissement sont en fait des méthodes de conservation. Pour la facilité, nous les présentons avec les méthodes de traitement. La température de stérilisation du lait dépend du produit désiré : ? La pasteurisation basse est bonne pour le lait de consommation et le fromage ? La pasteurisation haute est bonne pour le yaourt, le beurre et le kéfir.Quand il y a pas une thermomètre à mesurer la température exacte, chauffez le lait jusqu'à le point de bouillir.La méthode A ci-dessous est appropriée lorsque l'on peut contrôler exactement la durée et la température. Les méthodes B et C sont plus hygiéniques, mais ne permettent pas de connaître la température exacte du lait. La crème est constituée des graisses qui flottent à la surface du lait de vache. Une couche de crème contenant 20% de graisses se forme à la surface du lait de vache laissé au repos pendant au moins une demijournée. Elle est facile à recueillir avec une cuillère. Les laits de brebis et de chèvre donnent peu de crème. Le recueil de la crème nécessite l'utilisation d'un séparateur ou d'une écrémeuse centrifuge. Avec 10 litres de lait, on doit pouvoir obtenir 1 à 2 litres de crème.Le lait écrémé qui reste après le retrait de la crème a encore une grande valeur nutritive car il contient presque toutes les protéines du lait. Il peut être bu ou transformé en lait fermenté ou en fromage.La crème ou le lait aigres (fermentés) sont fabriqués par incubation de crème fraîche ou de lait frais inoculés. Cette inoculation se fait au moyen d'une culture de bactéries lactiques. On distingue différents groupes de laits fermentés dont voici les principales différences : ? Les différentes sortes de lait : lait de vache, de chèvre, de brebis, de bufflesse, de chamelle et de jument. ? Type de flore de fermentation. ? La façon dont le lait est traité, avant ou après fermentation.Différentes sortes de bactéries produisent différentes sortes de lait fermenté. Le yaourt, le dahi, le laban, le nono et le koumis sont tous obtenus de cette façon mais ont des goûts, des couleurs et des textures différentes. Le lait commence à fermenter après inoculation bactérienne. Le cycle de fermentation dure au total un à deux jours. Au cours de cette période, les bactéries se développent en quatre phases.Pendant cette période, les bactéries sont relativement peu nombreuses et doivent s'adapter à leur nouvel environnement. Leur multiplication est encore très lente. La durée de cette période dépend du type de bactéries, de leur qualité, de la température du lait et d'éventuels facteurs inhibant la croissance.Une fois adaptées à leur nouvel environnement, les bactéries se multiplient rapidement et commencent à transformer le lactose en acide lactique. Le lait s'épaissit suite à la coagulation des protéines et il prend une saveur aigre.Pendant cette période, le nombre de bactéries reste constant parce qu'elles ne peuvent se développer dans le lait fermenté.Suite à l'épuisement de la source alimentaire et à la production d'acide lactique, les bactéries deviennent inactives et finissent par mourir.Remarque : La baisse progressive de l'activité bactérienne explique pourquoi il ne faut pas attendre trop longtemps avant d'incorporer au lait frais une partie de la culture (inoculation) :On Chaque produit, par exemple le yaourt et le fromage, requiert une culture de départ différente. Si vous pouvez vous procurer une culture en poudre, suivez bien les indications inscrites sur l'emballage. Après ouverture de l'emballage, les bactéries ne survivent pas longtemps, en tout cas pas plus de 6 mois.Pour fabriquer une culture de départ, il faut : ? du lait frais ; ? un thermomètre ; ? une source de chaleur ;? une casserole de taille normale (1 à 2 litres) avec couvercle ; ? une culture de départ fraîche ou en poudre ; ? un endroit à température élevée constante (par exemple une boîte isotherme) ; ? une cuillère ou une petite mesure ; ? des pots en verre se fermant bien.Vous pouvez stériliser le matériel en trempant les cuillères, louches et couvercles dans de l'eau bouillante pendant au moins 5 minutes. La fabrication de la première culture nécessite l'utilisation d'une poudre achetée dans le commerce ou une culture liquide fraîche et active. Si vous utilisez une poudre : mélangez-la à une petite quantité de lait jusqu'à obtenir une pâte bien lisse (tout ce qui entre en contact avec la pâte de départ doit avoir été bouilli). Rajoutez du lait froid préalablement bouilli (suivez le mode d'emploi sur l'emballage) et laissez le mélange reposer à la température indiquée. Les cultures sèches sont généralement plus faibles que les cultures fraîches. Mieux vaut donc les inoculer une deuxième fois et les incuber à nouveau avant de les utiliser pour la fabrication d'autres produits (voir figure 13).En cas de culture liquide fraîche, ajoutez 1 à 3% de cette culture dans le lait pour l'inoculer. Pour les cultures en poudre, suivez les instructions fournies sur l'emballage. Le lait inoculé doit être incubé quelque temps à une certaine température (20 à 24 heures à une température de 18-20°C). Les bactéries ont ainsi le temps de se multiplier et le lait de fermenter.Des produits différents comme le fromage et le yaourt requièrent aussi différentes cultures de départ. L'incubation du yaourt dure beaucoup moins longtemps, de 3 à 6 heures pour des températures de respectivement 45 et 38°C.Les bactéries commencent à croître dès que la culture est mélangée au lait. Il faut alors maintenir la température constante. Il y a plusieurs façons de maintenir la culture à la température désirée : on peut verser le lait chaud dans une bouteille thermos ou utiliser une boîte isotherme contenant un récipient rempli du lait en fermentation. On peut aussi recouvrir la casserole fermée d'une couverture ou placer le pot fermé sous les couvertures du lit.Une fois la culture fermentée, elle peut être utilisée pour faire des laitages fermentés et du fromage.Le maintien de la culture nécessite son transfert quotidien dans du lait fraîchement bouilli et refroidi, écrémé éventuellement. Cette manipulation empêche les bactéries de trop s'affaiblir et de perdre de leur efficacité. Une partie de la culture existante sert à inoculer le lait frais qui est à son tour fermenté pour devenir la nouvelle « culture mère ». Le reste de la culture originale sert à faire des produits comme le yaourt, le fromage et le babeurre. Un ajout de 1 à 3 % de culture au lait est suffisant. Après incubation il faut faire refroidir le lait en le mettant par exemple dans le réfrigérateur où il incubera à nouveau pendant 20 à 24 heures. Si vous disposez d'un réfrigérateur, vous pouvez faire l'inoculation une fois par semaine mais il vaut mieux rafraîchir la culture deux fois par semaine. La culture mère doit être refroidie.Si toute la culture n'est pas utilisée immédiatement, le reste peut être conservé dans un endroit froid (réfrigérateur) pendant une semaine. Après un usage trop répété, elle s'affaiblit et sa qualité baisse. Elle perd son goût acide et frais. Si vous constatez après quelque temps une baisse de l'activité de la culture, utilisez une nouvelle culture fraîche.En règle générale, la culture est bonne à jeter s'il faut plus de 10 heures pour faire du yaourt à 40-45 °C ou plus de 30 heures pour que le lait s'acidifie après l'ajout de la culture (à une température de 20°C). Si Si la fermentation est lente et si le coagulé est peu épais et a perdu son un goût frais, vous pouvez être sûr que les bactéries ne sont plus très actives.Au lieu d'utiliser du lait de culture, on peut utiliser du lait en poudre. Il faut absolument dissoudre la poudre de lait dans de l'eau potable ayant bouilli. Au lieu d'une culture, on peut utiliser une petite quantité d'un produit frais (yaourt, lait acide ou babeurre) récemment fabriqué mais cette méthode n'est pas très sûre. Le moyen le plus sûr -mais, hélas, le plus coûteux -est d'utiliser chaque fois une nouvelle culture de départ, surtout quand on ne fait pas de laitages acides régulièrement (pas tous les mois). Cela évite l'inoculation quotidienne.Lorsqu'il est trop difficile de se procurer des cultures de départ, vous pouvez fabriquer vous-même de simples cultures d'acide lactique à partir du lait cru (voir figure 12). Conservez le lait cru à la température ambiante jusqu'à ce qu'il ait développé assez d'acide pour cailler : laissez par exemple 1 litre de lait frais cru pendant 24 à 48 heures à une température de 20 à 30 °C.Faites bouillir une seconde quantité de lait que vous laissez refroidir à la température à laquelle le lait fermente habituellement au cours du processus de production. Ecumez (et jetez) la couche supérieure du lait acidifié spontanément à l'aide d'une cuillère ou d'une louche (pour enlever les micro-organismes qui adhèrent aux globules de graisse). Ajoutez au lait bouilli une petite quantité (2-5%) de ce lait acidifié (appelé inoculum) et mélangez soigneusement.Après 24 heures d'incubation à la température ambiante, utilisez un peu du lait acidifié (1-2%) restant pour inoculer du lait frais bouilli à une température d'environ 20°C (voir figure 14). Répétez l'opération quotidiennement pendant une semaine.La fermentation prend place dans une bouteille fermée avec un bouchon désinfecté ou dans un pot hermétiquement fermé. Isolement et production d'une culture de départ simple ; la culture finale peut être utilisée pour une inoculation à 1-3%. Et ainsi de suite. Il est d'importance cruciale que tous les ustensiles et instruments utilisés (pots, cuillères, etc.) soient propres et désinfectés. Évitez la contamination après la désinfection ! Après cette période de mise en culture, le lait aigre peut être utilisé comme culture de départ car les bactéries lactiques auront supplanté presque toutes les autres bactéries. Certains problèmes de fermentation peuvent être dus aux causes suivantes : ? Le lait contient des antibiotiques comme la pénicilline (si la vache a été traitée aux antibiotiques). ? Le lait a été contaminé par du peroxyde d'hydrogène ou des désinfectants qui ralentissent la fermentation. ? La température d'incubation du lait est trop basse (inférieure à 18°C). ? La température du lait au moment de l'inoculation était trop élevée (environ 40°C).Le schéma 15 donne un aperçu des différents produits laitiers dérivés du lait. La plupart des recettes de laitages utilisent plusieurs méthodes de conservation (refroidissement, chauffage, séchage, acidication, salage). Les différentes sortes de lait donnent des résultats différents.Toutes les casseroles et tous les récipients et ustensiles utilisés doivent être très soigneusement désinfectés (voir chapitre 3).Il faut : du lait cru non bouilli et une source de chaleur. Un lait acidifié spontanément mais ayant conservé un bon goût et un bon arôme peut encore être baratté.La durée du barattage varie de 5 à 60 minutes selon certains facteurs, tels que : ? la sorte d'animal laitier ; ? le taux de graisse de la crème ; ? le traitement de la crème ; il faut laisser à la crème le temps (au moins 12 heures à 10-18°C) de cristalliser une partie des graisses avant de la baratter ; ? la nourriture consommée par l'animal qui influence la cristallisation (= point de fusion) des graisses ; ? la température pendant le barattage.Ce dernier aspect dépend également du point de fusion des graisses. Si la crème est trop froide, les particules de graisse ont du mal à s'agglutiner et le barattage prend plus de temps. Si la crème est trop chaude, le barattage est rapide mais les particules de graisse ne s'agglutinent pas non plus et le malaxage est impossible. La température de barattage doit être de 15 à 20°C.Le beurre a une durée de conservation limitée. Il peut moisir ou rancir. Un déplaisant goût de fromage peut se développer suite à la détérioration des protéines. On peut choisir de faire du beurre clarifié (voir ci-dessous) qui se conserve plus longtemps que le beurre. Le beurre clarifié s'obtient en retirant du beurre les dernières gouttes d'eau par évaporation après réchauffement, ou en faisant fondre le beurre et en l'égouttant pour séparer l'eau des graisses.Le babeurre est un produit secondaire de la fabrication du beurre. Son goût est plus ou moins acide en fonction de l'acidité de la crème ou du lait utilisé pour la fabrication du beurre et en fonction du degré d'acidification après barattage.Il est également possible de faire du babeurre acidifié avec du lait complet ou écrémé, en l'inoculant avec du lait aigre et en le faisant fermenter pendant une journée.Pour le lait aigre, il faut : du lait frais (écrémé) ; une source de chaleur ; une cuillère en bois ; du lait frais fermenté, du babeurre ou une culture de départ au choix ; une casserole à fond épais et un thermomètre.Chauffez le lait entier ou écrémé jusqu'à ébullition en remuant constamment. Refroidissez-le jusqu'à 18-20°C, par exemple dans une grande casserole remplie d'eau froide. Ajoutez 10-30 ml de lait aigre ou de babeurre ou d'une culture de départ par litre de lait (1%). Laissez reposer pendant 18-24 heures à une température ambiante de 18-20 °C. Au-delà de cette température, la fermentation se fera plus rapidement. Le lait aigre est alors prêt. Conservez-le dans un endroit frais (dans un cellier ou un réfrigérateur) afin de le conserver pendant plusieurs jours.Il faut : ? du beurre ; ? une source de chaleur ; ? une casserole ; ? une spatule métallique.Chauffez le beurre jusqu'à séparation de l'eau et de la graisse ; la graisse remonte à la surface. Il existe deux méthodes pour enlever l'eau : ? En continuant à chauffer jusqu'à évaporation de l'eau. ? En enlevant la couche de graisse avec une cuillère. Chauffez à nouveau cette graisse. Enlevez régulièrement la crème qui se forme, de préférence avec une écumoire. La couleur du beurre clarifié varie de presque blanc à brun foncé. Il peut avoir un goût un peu rance mais non un goût de brûlé. Dans ce cas, il doit être jeté. La préparation du koa prend beaucoup de temps (quelques heures) et nécessite beaucoup de combustible. En outre, un litre de lait ne produit que 0,4 litres de koa.Le rabi est du lait concentré sucré. On ajoute de temps en temps du sucre au lait pendant la concentration. Pour le préparer, il vous faut : ? du lait (non bouilli) ; ? une source de chaleur ; ? une casserole en fer propre, large, peu profonde à fond épais ; ? une surface métallique plate ; ? du sucre ; ? une balance.Ajoutez du sucre au lait qui chauffe (300 g maximum par litre de lait) et suivez le même procédé que pour le koa. On retrouve souvent des morceaux de sucre dans le produit fini.Le yaourt est le produit de l'acidification du lait par certaines bactéries lactiques se développant à des températures bien supérieures à la température de la pièce : 37 -45°C. Il faut d'abord chauffer le lait à 85°C ou plus. Une température de pasteurisation élevée (supérieure à 72°C) permet d'obtenir un produit final de meilleure consistance. Après l'acidification du lait, on peut utiliser le yaourt obtenu pour faire du yaourt plus frais en l'ajoutant à du lait frais.Il vous faut : ? du lait cru frais ; ? une source de chaleur ; ? une casserole ; ? une source de refroidissement (grand récipient rempli d'eau froide) ; ? une cuillère ; ? un thermomètre ; ? une culture de départ pour yaourt ou un peu de yaourt frais ; ? une bouteille thermos ou une boîte couverte d'une couverture ; ? un endroit froid (réfrigérateur ou cellier).Chauffez le lait à 85°C ou à son point d'ébullition et maintenez cette température pendant 3 minutes. Refroidissez-le à 45°C. Ajoutez 2 cuillères à soupe (30 ml) de yaourt par litre de lait ;le yaourt ne doit pas dater de plus de 2 jours. Si le yaourt est frais, vous pouvez utiliser une culture de départ pour yaourt. Mélangez le lait et la culture et laissez-le fermenter. Le temps nécessaire dépend de la température. A titre indicatif : à 40-45 °C, il faut de 3 à 6 heures ; à 35-37 °C, de 20 à 15 heures ; à 30°C °C, 24 heures environ.La température idéale pour obtenir un yaourt à la saveur agréable et de consistance ferme est 40-45°C. Il est impossible de fabriquer du yaourt à des températures inférieures à 30°C ou supérieures à 50°C. La bonne température peut être maintenue en mettant le récipient dans une boîte isotherme ou en le couvrant d'une couverture. Le yaourt est prêt pour la consommation lorsque la période d'incubation est terminée. Le yaourt se conserve au froid pendant une semaineChauffez le lait à 85°C puis refroidissez-le à 45°C. Versez 90% du lait dans une bouteille thermos bien rincée avec de l'eau chaude. Mélangez au lait restant 1 à 2 cuillères à soupe de yaourt fraîchement préparé (ou de culture de yaourt) et ajoutez-le dans la bouteille thermos. Fermez bien la bouteille et laissez reposer pendant 3 à 6 heures. Retirez le yaourt du thermos et conservez-le dans un endroit froid. Le yaourt de lait de brebis est trop épais pour être fait en bouteille thermos.Reconstituez le lait à partir du lait en poudre selon les doses indiquées sur l'emballage en ajoutant 10 à 15% de poudre en plus. Diluez le lait en poudre dans de l'eau, faites bouillir puis faites refroidir en dessous de 45°C.Incorporez 1 à 3 cuillères à soupe de yaourt frais ou de culture de yaourt par litre de lait. Couvrez la casserole et placez-la dans un endroit chaud et isolé. Après 3 à 6 heures, le yaourt (ferme et concentré) est prêt à la consommation.Pour faire du yaourt, il faut utiliser de préférence du lait frais mais on peut aussi utiliser du lait en poudre. Le lait stérilisé donne un yaourt plus fin que le lait pasteurisé. Après l'incubation, le refroidissement est souhaitable, si possible en dessous de 10 °C, pour arrêter l'acidification (le goût reste bon). Les bactéries restent viables et le yaourt peut être utilisé pour inoculer du lait frais.Veillez à ce que le lait s'acidie le plus vite possible, de préférence à 40-45°C plutôt qu'à 30°C. Les bactéries nuisibles se développent moins si la période de fermentation est plus courte. On obtient un yaourt plus épais en ajoutant 2 ou 3 cuillères à soupe de lait en poudre par litre de lait avant le chauffage à 85°C.Il est déconseillé d'utiliser comme culture de départ des yaourts aux fruits achetés dans le commerce car ils contiennent de nombreux additifs. On peut utiliser du yaourt nature acheté dans le commerce s'il n'est pas trop vieux. Le yaourt stérilisé ne convient pas car toutes les bactéries ont été détruites. Si on utilise comme culture du yaourt emballé dans du carton ou en pot, il faut d'abord en retirer la couche supérieure et prendre le yaourt du milieu : les bactéries y sont plus diverses et plus actives. Remuez le moins possible pour éviter le risque d'introduire des bactéries nuisibles.Comme le yaourt, le kéfir est un laitage traditionnel des tribus nomades des régions froides du Caucase. La fabrication du kéfir produit de l'acide, du gaz et un peu d'alcool. Comme le lait aigre et le babeurre, le kéfir a un goût spécial, différent de celui du yaourt. Il est fait avec une \"plante à yaourt\". Ce nom est trompeur car ce n'est pas une vraie plante et cela n'a rien à voir avec le yaourt.C'est en fait un amalgame en forme de chou-fleur de cristaux crayeux et de micro-organismes tels que les levures et les bactéries. Les levures produisent de l'alcool et du gaz et les bactéries transforment le lactose en acide lactique. Vous pouvez vous procurer un peu de culture de kéfir auprès de quelqu'un qui en fait régulièrement. Sinon, achetez sur le marché local quelques grains de kéfir séchés. Pour le préparer, il vous faut : du lait cru frais, une casserole, une source de chaleur, un thermomètre, un récipient propre, une bouteille à goulot large, une bouteille fermant hermétiquement, des grains de kéfir ou une \"plante à yaourt\", un tamis, une source de refroidissement, de l'eau propre, un torchon, un endroit froid pour le conserver. Le kéfir peut être laissé à mûrir pour donner lieu à la fermentation. Cette opération est essentielle pour obtenir les qualités caractéristiques du produit. Versez le lait dans une bouteille bien propre qui se ferme ou dans une bouteille à capsule fixe. Ne la remplissez pas plus qu'aux trois quarts, car du gaz se forme pendant la maturation. Maintenez la bouteille à environ 15 °C pendant 3 jours maximum. Vers la fin de la maturation, le petit-lait se sépare et peut être réincorporé en mélangeant et agitant la bouteille. Le produit fini est une boisson épaisse, crémeuse, mousseuse, au goût et à l'arôme acides, provenant du dioxyde de carbone produit. Si vous laissez mûrir le kéfir pendant plus de 3 jours, le lait risque de cailler et la boisson sera trop acide. La température et la durée de maturation sont importantes car elles déterminent le goût du produit. Le kéfir se conserve pendant quelques jours au réfrigérateur ou dans un cellier.Conservation des grains de kéfir Si vous arrêtez quelque temps la production de kéfir, faites sécher les grains de kéfir comme suit : mettez-les dans une passoire et rincez-les soigneusement avec de l'eau propre pour enlever tous les restes de lait. Déposez-les dans un torchon propre et laissez-les sécher dans un endroit propre, mais pas au soleil, jusqu'à ce que les grains soient recroquevillés. Vous pouvez alors les conserver dans une bouteille fermée dans un endroit froid pendant 12 à 18 mois. Les grains rincés peuvent se conserver au congélateur.On peut aussi les conserver dans un pot rempli d'eau à 4°C mais ils deviennent alors inactifs après 8 à 10 jours.Le risque d'échec est plus grand avec le kéfir qu'avec le yaourt. Le produit fini peut non seulement avoir un mauvais goût mais aussi être nocif. La production d'un bon kéfir demande une hygiène rigoureuse. Veillez aussi à ne pas travailler à des températures trop élevées.La durée de conservation du kéfir est la même que celle du yaourt et du babeurre : sa qualité peut baisser rapidement s'il est conservé trop longtemps. Les produits acides se conservent à 5°C pendant environ 10 jours et à 10 °C pendant 3 jours. 20°C est une température trop élevée.Le kéfir peut avoir un goût trop acide ou un goût de levure suite à un mauvais équilibre entre l'activité de la bactérie et celle des levures. Quand l'hygiène est insuffisante, la détérioration des protéines par des bactéries nuisibles peut donner un goût d'ammoniaque ou de poisson.Le koumiss est une boisson acide semblable au kéfir. Elle est fabriquée à partir du lait de jument. Le fromage est un produit connu depuis de nombreux siècles. Toutes les matières nutritives du lait ou presque sont concentrées dans le fromage (voir tableau 4).Les variétés de fromage sont extrêmement nombreuses et de composition variée. L'on distingue grossièrement les fromages frais des fromages à pâte cuite et les fromages à pâte molle des fromages à pâte dure. Les fromages frais peuvent être consommés immédiatement après la fabrication. Les fromages affinés en revanche doivent être conservés après fabrication pour obtenir le goût et la texture désirés. Les fromages à pâte molle contiennent plus d'eau que les fromages à pâte sèche ; le fromage sec (ou demi-sec) possède généralement une croûte propre et sèche. Les fromages à pâte molle ou sèche peuvent être mis à maturation pendant plusieurs semaines voire plusieurs années. Sous les tropiques, la production de fromage rencontre certains problèmes particuliers qui entraînent des modes de préparation et des produits finis différents de ceux d'Europe occidentale.? En effet, hors des zones tempérées, il faut compter avec des températures élevées et une forte humidité de l'air. Ces facteurs sont défavorables à la fabrication du fromage, spécialement à sa maturation. ? Bien souvent, le lait n'est disponible qu'en petites quantités et sa qualité laisse à désirer, surtout en ce qui concerne l'hygiène et la composition. ? Les fromages à pâte dure et mi-dure exigent un lait de bonne qualité et une préparation très hygiénique. Des températures modérées sont nécessaires à une bonne maturation et à la conservation de ces fromages. Dans les climats chauds et tropicaux, la fabrication de fromage se fait généralement à petite échelle et la conservation des produits est limitée. C'est pourquoi on y fabrique surtout des fromages frais. ? Dans beaucoup de pays tropicaux et subtropicaux, les fromages bien faits ne sont pas appréciés. Les consommateurs ne sont pas habitués à leur goût et à leur odeur très prononcés.La conservation des fromages varie de quelques jours à quelques mois, voire quelques années, selon le mode de préparation.Les fromages frais, comme les produits fermentés, ont une durée de conservation très limitée. Ils doivent être consommés immédiatement ou dans les jours qui suivent. On peut préserver leur qualité en les mettant au frais ou en les salant. Le fromage frais n'a généralement pas de croûte et est conditionné dans du papier ou en pot. La coagulation de la plupart des fromages frais se fait uniquement à l'acide ; les fromages ne peuvent pas mûrir et il faut les consommer dans les jours qui suivent de préférence.Les fromages à pâte molle sont obtenus avec de l'acide et de la présure ; ils peuvent mûrir pendant quelques semaines voire quelques mois. Les fromages à pâte molle possèdent généralement une croûte recouverte d'une flore microbiologique (Camembert, Brie).Les fromages à pâte mi-dure et dure se conservent pendant 3-4 mois voire plus. Les fromages qui peuvent continuer à mûrir ne doivent pas être conservés au réfrigérateur mais dans un cellier ou un endroit frais à 10-15°C. Nous indiquons dans les recettes présentées ici le mode et la durée de conservation des différents fromages.La fabrication du fromage se fait en trois grandes étapes : 1 Coagulation du lait (caillage), séparation du caillé et du résidu liquide, le petit-lait. 2 Préservation du caillé l'acidification du caillé et le salage sont importants. Le fromage doit aussi être bien enveloppé d'une croûte ou d'un emballage efficace. 3 Affinage (maturation) du fromage pour lui donner une bonne texture et de bonnes qualités organoleptiques.On distingue quelques manipulations de base pour la fabrication du fromage, à savoir : 1 La coagulation de la protéine du lait incorporant la matière grasse ; 2 Égouttage du petit-lait ; 3 Acidification du caillé ; 4 Recueil du caillé qui devient un fromage ; 5 Salage ; 6 Affinage.L'obtention du fromage frais (blanc) suit les étapes 1 à 3 ; celle du fromage affiné les étapes 1 à 6.Nous traitons dans ce chapitre des manipulations de base suivantes : ? le traitement et la qualité du lait utilisé pour la fabrication du fromage (pasteurisation et/ou standardisation) ; ? la coagulation du lait (formation de grumeaux) à l'aide d'un acide ou d'enzymes ; ? la séparation du caillé et du petit-lait ; ? le recueil et le traitement du caillé (chauffage, recueil, presse, salage) ; ? l'affinage (maturation) du fromage.La fabrication des fromages ne nécessite pas toujours tout le matériel mentionné ici. Avant de commencer, choisissez le matériel que vous allez utiliser et veillez à ce qu'il soit propre et rincé à l'eau propre. Utilisez de préférence du matériel en métal inoxydable ou en verre.Matériel nécessaire à la fabrication du fromage : 1 un thermomètre de 20 à 100 °C ; 2 un flacon mesureur ; 3 un seau pour le caillage du lait ; 4 des moules à fromage pouvant être faites de différentes manières (voir ci-dessous) ; 5 gaze, de taille adaptée à celle du moule ; 6 des couverts et ustensiles :? des cuillères pour calculer la quantité de présure et/ou d'acides ; ? un couteau pour couper le lait caillé ; ? une écumoire ou une passoire pour séparer le caillé du petit-lait.Les moules à fromage peuvent être faits de matériaux variés : en bois, en plastique ou en métal (mais alors inoxydable). N'utilisez pas de tuyaux en plastique destinés au bâtiment car ils peuvent exhaler des matières empoisonnées. Coupez les moules dans le sens de la longueur et faites des trous de l'intérieur vers l'extérieur On peut trouver dans le commerce des moules en plastique pour la fabrication de fromage à pâte molle. Les moules en bois font également l'affaire. ? les matériaux utilisés ne doivent pas être toxiques ; ? le matériel doit pouvoir être lavé et désinfecté facilement ;? la pression doit être suffisante (0,1 à 0,4 kg/cm2 ou 2 à 5 fois le poids du fromage).La fabrication du fromage commence par une traite pratiquée de façon hygiénique. La qualité du lait influe beaucoup sur l'arôme, le goût et la conservation des qualités du fromage. La composition du lait peut énormément variée : juste avant le tarissement (période pendant laquelle la vache n'est pas traite) et juste après le vêlage (naissance d'un veau), le lait a une composition et un goût différents. Le lait d'un animal ayant une infection du pis ne convient pas à la consommation humaine et ne convient donc pas non plus à la fabrication du fromage.Outre les mesures d'hygiène habituelles à prendre à la traite, il faut veiller aux points suivants : 1 le matériel doit être très bien nettoyé 2 après la désinfection, aucune trace de détergent ou de désinfectant ne doit rester sur les appareils. Les désinfectants freinent le développement de la bactérie de départ ou de l'agent de fermentation. 3 l'endroit où le fromage est fabriqué doit être très propre. 4 le lait destiné au fromage sera de préférence pasteurisé (15 secondes à 72°C ou 30 minutes à 63°C). Un chauffage plus intensif n'est pas souhaitable car il freine la coagulation du lait. il faut alors plus de coagulant ou de chlorure de calcium (CaCl2) 5 C'est pourquoi le lait en poudre fabriqué à très haute température convient moins à la fabrication du fromage. Seul le lait en poudre fabriqué à basse température peut être utilisé. 6 Du lait aigre neutralisé avec du bicarbonate de natrium caille mal.Le principe de la fabrication du fromage repose sur la coagulation de la protéine du lait contenant quelque 90% des graisses du lait. La masse coagulée est appelée \"caillé\". Le liquide restant est le petit-lait. Le caillé contient surtout les graisses et les protéines du lait (caséine), le petit-lait contient surtout de l'eau, les sucres du lait (lactose), des protéines (du sérum) et des vitamines B.Il y a deux manières de faire coaguler le lait : ? à l'aide d'un acide ; ? à l'aide de présure. Coagulation à l'acide La coagulation à l'acide est généralement appliquée pour la fabrication du fromage frais. L'acide peut provenir soit des bactéries d'une culture de départ, soit d'un acide ajouté. Lorsqu'on utilise une culture, le lait pasteurisé est inoculé. Les produits d'inoculation peuvent être une culture spécifique, du petit-lait ou du babeurre.La durée de coagulation dépend de la quantité d'agent d'inoculation (0,1-5%), de la température (20-35°C) et de la culture utilisée. La période de coagulation est de 2 à 16 heures. Le caillage est terminé lorsque le caillé est ferme.L'acide utilisé peut être : l'acide acétique pur, l'acide lactique, l'acide citrique ou tout autre acide organique inoffensif. On peut utiliser aussi un acide naturel comme du jus de citron. L'acide peut être ajouté goutte à goutte au lait chaud (environ 80°C-90 °C, juste après l'ébullition). Le lait coagule plus rapidement si la température est élevée.Le caillé est obtenu en pressant le lait caillé dans un tissu grossièrement tissé. Le caillé peut être ensuite pressé ou non. Ces produits sont consommés frais.Le coagulant utilisé pour la fabrication du fromage peut être d'origine animale, végétale ou microbienne. Le coagulant a deux fonctions : ? la coagulation du lait ; ? la dégradation des protéines du lait lors de la maturation ; il donne au lait un goût piquant.Le coagulant se présente sous forme liquide ou en poudre séchée. Etant une enzyme, donc un produit biologique, le coagulant liquide stocké perd de son activité. Il faut donc lui préférer la forme séchée.Le taux de concentration du coagulant est indiqué sur l'emballage. La quantité à ajouter dépend de son activité et de la sorte de fromage désirée. On n'a pas toujours besoin de coagulant pour faire du fromage à pâte molle. Si l'on en ajoute tout de même, il en faut très peu (0,1 ml de coagulant pour 10 litres de lait). Pour les fromages à pâte dure, il faut environ 1,5 ml de coagulant pour 10 litres de lait (la force du coagulant est de 1 : 10000).Avant ou pendant l'addition du coagulant, on ajoute presque toujours un acide.Les facteurs qui influencent la coagulation sont : ? La quantité de coagulant ou d'acide.? La température de coagulation. Si on utilise un coagulant, une légère hausse de température réduit considérablement la période de coagulation (de 30°C à 33°C par exemple). ? L'intensité de la pasteurisation. La coagulation diminue si le lait est chauffé à haute température. On peut annuler cet effet en ajoutant un peu de CaCl2 (7 g pour 100 litres de lait). ? Le pourcentage de graisses du lait. Si ce pourcentage est élevé, il y a plus de graisses à incorporer et la coagulation est plus lente. Il existe trois façons de séparer le caillé du petit-lait : ? Vous suspendez le mélange caillé/petitlait dans un torchon propre (voir figure 24). ? Vous déposez le mélange caillé/petit-lait dans des moules à fromage ou dans des faisselles (moules cylindriques aux parois perforées). ? Vous coupez et agitez le mélange caillé/petit-lait, vous mettez le caillé dans des moules à fromage et vous pressez le fromage.La première et la deuxième méthode sont généralement utilisées pour la fabrication du fromage frais. L'égouttage du petit-lait ramène le volume du caillé à la moitié du volume de départ. La dernière méthode devra être utilisée pour la fabrication de fromage bien fait pour extraire du caillé assez de petit-lait. Les effets du découpage et de la pression sont décrits plus bas.Le petit-lait est un sous-produit du fromage. Son acidité et sa composition dépendent largement de la sorte de fromage et du mode de fabrication. Le petit-lait provenant de fromages coagulés à la présure est moins acide que celui provenant de fromages coagulés à l'acide. Le mode de fabrication du fromage influe aussi sur la présence d'éléments solides. S'il y a beaucoup de particules solides, comme dans le cas du fromage de chèvre ou d'un traitement de caillé brut, ces particules peuvent être transformés en fromage de petit-lait. La Ricotta italienne est une sorte bien connue de fromage de petit-lait.Fabrication de la ricotta à partir du petit-lait 1 Chauffez le petit-lait acidifié à au moins 85°C ou faites-le bouillir jusqu'à ce que les protéines coagulent. 2 Ajoutez du sel (0,1%) si vous le désirez. 3 Récupérez le caillé coagulé en le filtrant à travers un torchon ou un filtre. 4 En pressant bien le caillé, vous obtiendrez un fromage à pâte dure.Si vous pressez peu ou pas du tout, vous obtenez du fromage frais. 5 Ajoutez du sel si vous ne l'avez pas encore fait et si vous le désirez. 6 Conservez le fromage dans le réfrigérateur.Les déchets de petit-lait pouvant être nocifs, il est grandement préférable de les donner en nourriture aux animaux. Le petit-lait a une grande valeur nutritive grâce à ses protéines. Il peut être donné aux cochons ou aux jeunes animaux (veaux, agneaux), et même aux vaches adultes ou de boucherie.Le petit-lait donné aux animaux doit absolument être acide (complètement acidifié) sans quoi le lactose qu'il contient pourrait causer des problèmes intestinaux aux animaux.La quantité de petit-lait (eau) dans le caillé influe beaucoup sur les propriétés du fromage. La teneur en eau détermine en effet le temps de maturation, le goût, la texture, la bonne conservation du fromage, etc.Le petit-lait contient du sucre de lait (lactose). Ce sucre doit être converti en acide lactique par les ferments lactiques de la culture de départ.Si beaucoup de petit-lait est extrait du caillé, le fromage contiendra peu d'humidité et donnera un fromage sec et dur qui devra être affiné assez longtemps. S'il reste beaucoup de petit-lait dans le caillé, le fromage contient beaucoup d'humidité : sa pâte est molle. Il a alors le plus souvent un goût aigre. Comme le traitement du caillé du fromage frais et celui du caillé du fromage affiné diffèrent passablement, nous les présentons séparément.Le caillé ne doit en aucun cas refroidir. Il doit rester à une température de 30-36°C. Vous pouvez commencer à traiter le caillé si le lait coagulé forme une masse bien ferme. Pour en être sûr, passez un fil à travers le caillé : si vous obtenez une coupure lisse bien nette, c'est que le lait est suffisamment coagulé.Pour le fromage frais, on extrait généralement peu de petit-lait. Après la coagulation du lait, la masse caillé/petit-lait est soit suspendue dans une toile, soit mise dans des petits moules à fromage. Après 24 heures, l'égouttage est suffisant et le caillé doit être refroidi. Le fromage est prêt à la consommation. On peut faciliter l'égouttage du petit-lait en entassant les toiles remplies les unes sur les autres pour exercer une pression plus forte.Après la coagulation du lait, découpez la masse en cubes d'environ 1,5 cm avec un couteau qui coupe bien. Voir figure 25. Il est important que les cubes soient plus ou moins de la même taille et que ce découpage se déroule calmement. L'opération dure environ 15 minutes.Après le découpage, laissez reposer la masse petit-lait/caillé 10 minutes environ puis remuez-la soigneusement. Après quelque temps, remuez un peu plus intensément. Retirez le petit-lait du bac à fromage et mettez le caillé dans des moules. Pressez le caillé (0,1 kg/cm2). Une heure plus tard environ, vous pouvez augmenter la pression jusqu'à 0,4 kg/cm 2 . Il est également possible de presser avec 2 et même 5 fois le poids du fromage. Le salage peut se dérouler de différentes façons : 1 Mélangez le sel au caillé (30 g de sel par kg de caillé). Cela diminue l'effet de la bactérie souche mais freine à un stade précoce le développement d'éventuels micro-organismes nuisibles. Il existe de nombreuses variantes de la fabrication du fromage. Pour faire un bon produit, il faut en général légèrement ajuster la recette. C'est pourquoi il est bon de noter exactement sur un papier comment le fromage a été fait.Vous pouvez par exemple noter : ? la date et la température ambiante ; ? la qualité du lait et la température de pasteurisation ; ? la quantité de lait ; ? les ingrédients, la quantité de culture de départ, d'acide ou de coagulant ajoutée ; ? la température à laquelle ont été ajoutés la culture de départ, l'acide ou le coagulant ; ? la durée de coagulation ; ? les températures pendant le processus de fabrication ; ? la température en fin de coagulation ; ? la pression, la durée de la pression, etc. ; ? la durée du salage ; ? la durée et les conditions de stockage.Les recettes présentées ici doivent être considérées comme une introduction à la fabrication du fromage. A la place du lait de vache, vous pouvez utiliser du lait de brebis, de chèvre ou de bufflesse. Il est recommandé de commencer par une recette facile : yaourt, fromage frais, etc.Le fromage frais (non affiné) a un taux élevé d'humidité, d'environ 75%. Il peut être consommé immédiatement après sa fabrication. Le fromage frais est obtenu en extrayant le petit-lait du lait écrémé acidifié. La coagulation du lait a surtout lieu par acidification. On ajoute parfois un peu de coagulant pour faciliter l'égouttage du petitlait. Mais ce n'est pas indispensable.Une sorte bien connue de fromage frais est le fromage blanc (ou caillé), dénommée différemment suivant les pays : Frischkäse, kwark et baker's cheese. Ces fromages se différencient par leur taux de graisse.On fait du fromage blanc en laissant le lait frais, entier ou écrémé, surir et en faisant égoutter le lait aigre épais dans des gazes ou des sacs. Les sacs sont parfois entassés les uns sur les autres pour faciliter l'égouttage. Après l'égouttage, le fromage frais a une structure un peu friable. On peut le rendre lisse en remuant à la main ou au mixer. Il existe différentes sortes de fromage caillé en fonction de la teneur en humidité, en graisse, en sel et de la grosseur des particules de caillé.Le fromage frais a un goût frais et acide, surtout lorsqu'il est fabriqué avec du lait écrémé. Son goût sera plus doux et plus riche si on y ajoute de la crème.Le fromage frais se conserve pendant une période limitée et doit être gardé au frais. Une sécrétion de petit-lait a parfois encore lieu pendant la conservation. Cela peut être dû à une acidification tardive du produit.Pasteurisez le lait à une température de 63 °C pendant 30 minutes et refroidissez-le à 20 °C. Ajoutez ensuite, pour 10 litres de lait, un quart à un demi-litre d'acide, de lait aigre ou de babeurre, ainsi que du yaourt si vous le désirez. Ajoutez 2 gouttes de coagulant si vous en avez. Il est recommandé de diluer le coagulant dans quelques ml d'eau pour qu'il se répartisse mieux dans le lait.Après avoir bien remué, laissez reposer le lait inoculé pendant 24 heures à une température de 18/20°C. L'acidification et une certaine coagulation ont lieu pendant ces 24 heures, provoquant l'épaississement du lait. Cette masse épaisse est ensuite mise dans un torchon en coton ou en lin ou un sac à travers laquelle le petit-lait peut s'égoutter. Pour obtenir un bon égouttage, le torchon doit est étendu à l'avance dans une grande passoire ou un moule à fromage. Au bout de 24 heures environ, le petit-lait est suffisamment égoutté. Remuez intensivement le caillé restant, par exemple avec un mixer ou une cuillère, jusqu'à l'obtention d'une masse homogène. Le fromage blanc est prêt à la consommation. Il se conserve pendant 1 à 2 semaines au réfrigérateur.Il vous faut : une passoire, une petite corbeille ou un moule, une gaze ou un torchon. Laissez égoutter dans un linge 10 litres de babeurre à faible taux de graisse jusqu'à ce qu'il reste 1,5 litre de fromage en faisselle, ou caillé. Placez un linge dans la passoire, la petite corbeille ou le moule et pressez le caillé. Laissez égoutter pendant quelques heures et retournez. Vous obtenez alors environ 1,5 kg de fromage ne contenant pas de sel et presque pas de graisse. Ce fromage ne se conserve que peu de temps, 1 ou 2 semaines. Gardez-le au frais, de préférence au réfrigérateur. Il vous faut : du lait cru, une source de chaleur, une casserole, une cuillère, du jus de citron ou du petit-lait acide, une gaze, un récipient, un couteau et de l'eau très sucrée.Ce produit laitier sucré est orginaire de l'Inde. Il se présente traditionnellement sous la forme de boules de caillé doux. Le mode de fabrication suivant ne permet pas la mise en boules mais seulement le découpage en cubes.Faites bouillir le lait, en tournant constamment, avec du jus de citron (10 cuillères à soupe ou 150 ml pour 10 litres de lait) ou du petit-lait acide (1,5 litre pour 10 litres). Le petit-lait acide s'obtient à partir du lait acide égoutté, après la production du caillé. Séparez le caillé du petit-lait en versant le mélange dans une gaze placée au-dessus d'un récipient. Le caillé légèrement élastique est coupé en petits cubes de 2,5 cm de côté. Ces cubes sont ensuite cuits pendant une heure dans une solution très sucrée (600 g de sucre par litre d'eau). Il faut 1 litre de solution sucrée par kilo de caillé. Les cubes se conservent assez longtemps. Ils ont une saveur très sucrée.Il vous faut : du lait de brebis, de chèvre ou de vache, un acide ou du lait aigre frais, un coagulant, du sel de cuisine, un couteau, des faisselles, des gazes et des boîtes ou un récipient pour conserver le fromage.La feta est un fromage salé et piquant, originaire de Grèce, fait avec du lait de brebis ou de chèvre. On utilise parfois aussi un mélange de lait de brebis et de chèvre, ce qui fait perdre au fromage sa couleur blanche caractéristique. La feta se conserve dans une solution de petitlait et de saumure.Chauffez à 30 °C 10 litres de lait pasteurisé auquel vous avez ajouté 200 ml d'acide, de lait aigre ou de babeurre. Deux heures plus tard, ajoutez le coagulant : 2 ml pour 10 litres de lait Au bout d'une période de coagulation d'une heure environ, découpez le caillé en cubes de 2,5 cm de côté et remuez soigneusement pendant encore 20 minutes.Le transfert du caillé mou dans les moules recouverts d'une gaze doit être fait avec soin, soit en versant le caillé immédiatement dans les moules, soit en le laissant décanter, en vidant le petit-lait et en le mettant seulement ensuite dans les moules.Retournez les fromages au bout de quelques heures. Retirez soigneusement de la toile la masse caillée et replacez-la à l'envers. Après 24 heures, découpez les morceaux de caillé en cubes de 10 cm de côté. Le salage se fait en saupoudrant plusieurs fois les cubes avec du sel ou en les mettant dans une saumure pendant 24 heures.Pour conserver la feta pendant quelques jours (à 18 °C environ), il faut la retourner régulièrement et la laver à l'eau froide à la fin de la période de conservation. On peut la conserver quelque temps en entassant les cubes le plus possible dans un récipient et en les immergeant dans la saumure. La feta doit avoir une consistance lisse et douce.Le queso blanco est un fromage originaire d'Amérique latine. Il en existe de nombreuses variantes. Sa caractéristique est que le sel est ajouté directement à la masse petit-lait/caillé. Ceci a l'avantage de permettre l'utilisation de lait légèrement acidifié.Une méthode très courante est la suivante : Prenez du lait cru acidifié (non chauffé) à la température de 32 °C ou 10 litres de lait pasteurisé auquel vous ajoutez 50 ml de lait aigre, d'acide ou de babeurre. Ajoutez 1,5 ml de coagulant. Après 45 minutes, coupez le caillé et remuez. Laissez reposer le mélange petitlait/caillé pendant encore 30 minutes à 30-36 °C. Egouttez le petit-lait et pressez le caillé pour en extraire un maximum de petit-lait. Ajoutez au caillé 30-50 grammes de sel que vous aurez éventuellement dissous dans l'eau auparavant. Pour 10 litres de lait, il faut alors 100 grammes de sel dans 50 ml d'eau.Mettez le caillé salé dans des moules à fromage et pressez. Retournez le caillé plusieurs fois pendant la première heure. Il reste pressé ensuite jusqu'au lendemain. Pour améliorer la formation de la croûte, aspergez le fromage pendant la pression (après 1 heure) avec du petitlait chauffé à 50 °C. Le fromage fabriqué à l'aide d'un coagulant se conserve pendant 2 mois à 10-15 °C.Une variante de cette méthode consiste à remplacer la culture de départ par un acide, sans utiliser de coagulant. Prenez du lait cru, qui sera peut-être déjà un peu acide. Faites chauffer presque jusqu'à ébullition. Ajoutez pour l'acidification 300 ml de vinaigre pour 10 litres de lait. Il se forme alors un précipité. Pour neutraliser quelque peu l'acide, ajoutez éventuellement un peu de bicarbonate de soude. Egouttez le petit-lait. La suite de la fabrication est la même que dans la recette précédente.Fromage frais de chèvre (dans l'huile) Il faut : du lait de chèvre pasteurisé, une source de chaleur, une casserole avec couvercle, un thermomètre, du lait aigre (du babeurre ou une culture), un coagulant, une cuillère, une boîte isotherme/une couverture/des journaux, une gaze, du sel, des moules à fromage, un endroit frais et éventuellement du papier dégraissé, un grand pot, des herbes, de l'huile d'olive.Chauffez à 20 °C le lait de chèvre pasteurisé et ajoutez 1/2 litre de culture, de lait aigre ou babeurre pour 10 litres de lait. Diluez dans un peu d'eau 20 gouttes de coagulant (par litre de lait) et mélangez soigneusement au lait.Pour éviter au maximum le refroidissement, mettez la casserole dans une boîte thermos ou emballez-la dans des journaux ou une couverture. Contrôlez le lendemain si le lait est assez coagulé ; il y a alors un peu de petit-lait à la surface. Il faut : du lait de brebis pasteurisé, une source de chaleur, une casserole, un thermomètre, lait aigre (une culture ou du babeurre), un coagulant, une cuillère, un couteau, une passoire, une gaze, du matériel pour presser et des moules à fromage, du sel, un récipient à saumure fermant bien, une gaze grossière, un endroit frais. Dix litres de lait de brebis donnent environ 2 kg de fromage fait. Après l'ajout de 60 ml de culture ou de lait aigre (ou de babeurre), laissez reposer le lait à 30 °C pendant 1/2 heure ou 3/4 d'heure. Diluez seulement alors 6 gouttes de coagulant par litre de lait dans un peu d'eau et mélangez soigneusement au lait.Après avoir laissé coaguler pendant une heure, découpez le lait coagulé pendant 15 minutes jusqu'à ce qu'il se présente sous forme de particules de 1 à 2 cm. Remuez une seconde fois pendant 10 minutes. Videz la moitié du petit-lait et faites chauffer le caillé à 35°C en ajoutant de l'eau chaude à 80-100°C. Remuez encore une fois pendant 15 minutes puis laissez reposer le caillé pendant 30 minutes dans une casserole tenue au chaud, mais jamais placée directement sur le feu. Versez ensuite le petit-lait qui flotte à la surface et mettez le caillé dans une passoire avec le reste du petit-lait. Protex International / BIOPROX BP 177, F-92305, Levallois -Paris FRANCE (également au Maroc, au Royaume-Uni, au Portugal et en Espagne) T : + 33 (0) 1 41 34 14 00, F : + 33 (0) 1 41 34 14 16 E : postmaster@protex-international.com I : www.protex-international.com/products/food-flavouring.html Il est possible de commander des produits bio de BIOPROX pour l'industrie laitière (lait, fromage, beurre, yaourt) : culture lactique (mésophile et/ou thermophile) milieu de culture, facteur de croissance, correcteur pH, activateur de culture lactique, produits de nettoyage. ","tokenCount":"11129"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1683117903.json b/data/part_2/1683117903.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..05bb3db3e75b15438c43a10c2766f9145056686f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1683117903.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"68b2ff0a7bbda6763b745eef7fed9c23","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/5845f319-adf2-498c-a126-1fad66eced70/content","id":"888021589"},"keywords":["к ТсLr16","ТсLr19","ТсLr24","ТсLr26)","TCTTR (av: TcLr9","TcLr16","ТсLr19","ТсLr24)","TBTTR (av: ТсLr9","ТсLr16","ТсLr19","ТсLr24","ТсLr26) встречались во всех регионах. Фенотипы TQTTR (av: ТсLr19","ТсLr24","ТсLr26) и TGTTR (av: ТсLr9","ТсLr19","ТсLr24","ТсLr26) были общими для омской и североказахстанской популяций","а THPTR (av: ТсLr9","ТсLr11","ТсLr19","ТсLr24) и TCTTQ (av: ТсLr9","ТсLr16","ТсLr19","ТсLr20","ТсLr24"],"sieverID":"d3bf4628-da17-4f88-8c7d-2f10541835f6","pagecount":"7","content":"Листовые болезни яровой пшеницы -бурая ржавчина (возбудитель -Puccinia triticina), желтая пятнистость ( пиренофороз) (Pyrenophora tritici-repentis) и темно-бурая пятнистость (Сochliobolus sativus = Bipolaris sorokiniana) -относятся к группе распространенных и потенциально опасных болезней в западноазиатских регионах России и Северном Казахстане. Для обоснования стратегий генетической защиты пшеницы необходимы популяционные исследования фитопатогенов. Цель работыхарактеристика структуры популяций возбудителей бурой ржавчины и желтой пятнистости яровой пшеницы по признакам вирулентности и оценка распространенности возбудителя темно-бурой пятнистости в западноазиатских регионах Российской Федерации и Северном Казахстане в 2017 г. Источником инфекционного материала служили пораженные бурой ржавчиной и пятнистостями листья образцов яровой пше ницы, собранные в Челябинской и Омской областях и Северном Казахстане. Анализ вирулентности 109 изолятов P. triticina на 20 линиях-дифференциаторах показал, что все изученные монопустульные изоляты были авирулентны к ТсLr24. Изоляты, вирулентные к ТсLr19, выявлены только в челябинской популяции. Частоты вирулентных изолятов к ТсLr2a, ТсLr2b, ТсLr2c, ТсLr11, ТсLr15, ТсLr16, ТсLr20 и ТсLr26 были выше в омской и североказахстанской популяциях, а к ТсLr9 -в челябинской. При использовании 20 ТсLr-ли ний определено 27 фенотипов вирулентности P. triticina: 12 в омской, 19 в челябинской, 8 в ка захстанской. Феноти пы TLTTR (авирулентность (av) Wheat diseases affecting leaves like leaf rust (Puccinia triticina), tan spot (Pyrenophora tritici-repentis) and spot blotch (Сochliobolus sativus = Bipolaris sorokiniana) are widely spread and potentially dangerous in the West-Asian region of Russia and North Kazakhstan. The study of these pathogens' populations is very important for genetic protection of wheat. The objective of this study was to explore the population structure of the causative agents of leaf rust and tan spot on spring wheat based on virulence traits and assessing the distribution of the causative agent of spot blotch in the West-Asian region of Russia and North Kazakhstan. The source of inoculum were wheat leaves affected by leaf rust and spot diseases collected in the Chelyabinsk and the Omsk region of Russia and in North Kazakhstan. Virulence analysis of P. triticina using 20 lines with known Lr genes demonstrated that all 109 monopustule isolates were avirulent on ТсLr24. The isolates virulent on ТсLr19 were identified only in the Chelyabinsk population. The prevalence of isolates virulent on ТсLr2a, ТсLr2b, ТсLr2c, ТсLr11, ТсLr15, ТсLr16, ТсLr20 and ТсLr26 was higher in the Omsk and the North Kazakhstani population, while virulence to ТсLr9 was higher in Chelyabinsk. Using 20 TcLr-lines, we identified 27 virulent phenotypes of P. triticina: 12 in the Omsk, 19 in the Chelyabinsk and 8 in the Kazakhstani population. The phenotypes TLTTR (avirulent to TcLr16, TcLr19, TcLr24, TcLr26), TCTTR (avirulent to TcLr9, TcLr16, TcLr19, TcLr24), and TBTTR (avirulent to TcLr9, TcLr16, TcLr19, TcLr24, TcLr26) were observed in all the populations. The phenotypes TQTTR (avirulent to TcLr19, TcLr24, TcLr26) and TGTTR (avirulent to TcLr9, TcLr19, TcLr24, TcLr26, TcLr9, TcLr19, TcLr24, TcLr26) were common in the Omsk and the North Kazakhstani population, while THPTR (avirulent to avTcLr9, TcLr11, TcLr19, TcLr24) and TCTTQ (avirulent to TcLr9, TcLr16, TcLr19, TcLr20, TcLr24) were common in the Omsk and the Chelyabinsk population. There was a high genetic similarity in virulence and phenotypic composition between the Omsk and the North Kazakhstani population as well as between the Omsk and the Chelyabinsk population and a moderate similarity between the Chelyabinsk and the North Kazakhstani population. The prevalence of the spot blotch pathogen was higher in the material collected from the Omsk region, while none of this pathogen was identified in the NorthVavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding • 2018 • 22 • 3 ской и умеренное между челябинской и североказахстанской популяциями. Распространенность возбудителя темно-бурой листовой пятнистости в Омской области была выше, чем в Челябинской. Из североказахстанских инфек ционных образцов листьев С. sativus не выделен. Возбуди тель желтой пятнистости обнаружен во всех изученных ре гионах. По признаку токсинообразования среди челябин ских изолятов P. tritici-repentis выявлено пять рас (р1 (PtrToxA, PtrToxС); р2 (PtrToxA); р7 (PtrToxA, PtrToxВ), р8 (PtrToxA, PtrToxВ, PtrToxС); р4 (не образует токсины)); среди омских -три (р1, р2, р3); среди североказахстанских -четыре (р1, р2, р3, р4 pring wheat is the main cereal crop grown in the Urals, West Siberia and North Kazakhstan. Wheat diseases affecting leaves like leaf rust, stem rust, spot blotches and tan spot significantly reduce wheat yields in these regions (Koishybaev, 2010;Shamanin et al., 2016;Belan et al., 2017). Leaf rust (caused by Puccinia triticina Erikss.) occurs annually with severity fluctuating from moderate to epiphytotic. The disease appears from flag leaf to ear-flowering stages. Stem rust (caused by Puccinia graminis Pers. f. sp. tritici Erikss. et Henn.) develops later and prevails at grain ripening stages (Koishybaev, 2015). Until recently, glum blotch caused by Parastagonospora nodorum (Berk.) Quaedvl., Verkley & Crous (= Septoria nodorum Berk.) was the most important disease of wheat (Sanina, Pakholkova, 2002;Koishybaev, 2015). In the last ten years, however, the harmfulness of tan spot (caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Died.) Drechsler) has increased (Mikhailova et al., 2010(Mikhailova et al., , 2015;;Koishybaev, 2015). Under field conditions, tan spot and septoriosis are difficult to distinguish -even for experts. The spread of tan spot is promoted by the modern gentle soil treatment, after which a large number of plants remain on the surface and serves as a habitat for the wintering of P. tritici-repentis pseudotecia (Mikhailova et al., 2010). PtrToxA, PtroxB, PtrToxC exotoxins are the main pathogenicity factors of P. tritici-repentis. Ptr ToxA induces necrosis on susceptible plants, and both PtrToxB and PtrToxC induce chlorosis (Lamari et al., 1998). Spot blotch of wheat (caused by Сochliobolus sativus (S. Ito & Kurib.) Drechsler ex Dastur (= Bipolaris sorokiniana (Sacc.) Shoemaker)) is a more important disease in wet and warm years (Kuznetsova, 1987). These spots normally appear together at the wheat stalking stage (Koishybaev, 2010).Fungus population studies are important for improving genetic strategies of wheat protection. With these studies, the researcher can characterize the race composition dynamics, effectiveness of resistance genes at the host plants and evaluate the influence of commercial wheat varieties on fungus population changes. The population biology of leaf rust pathogens is the most studied. By virulence and microsatellite analyses, the existence of a common P. triticina population in the Urals West Siberia, and Kazakhstan (Mikhailova, 2006;Kolmer, Ordoñez, 2007;Kolmer et al., 2015;Gultyaeva et al., 2017) was shown, which should be taken into account when disposing varieties with Lr-genes. Annual virulence surveillance of P. triticina populations conducted by the Chelyabinsk Scientific Research Institute of Agriculture and the Omsk State Agrarian University allows the dynamics of pathogen variability to be monitored and breeding programs to be improved.First studies of P. tritici-repentis in Russia were carried out by Mikhailova et al. (2010Mikhailova et al. ( , 2015)). The existence of several P. triticirepentis populations in Russia (North Caucasian, Northwestern and West Siberian) was determined according to virulence frequencies in a special wheat differential set. An independent status of the Omsk P. tritici-repentis population was also confirmed by microsatellite markers (Mironenko et al., 2016).In the world literature, data about differential interactions between the plant host and С. sativus are controversial. The absence of differential sets significantly limits the population studies of the spot blotch pathogen based on virulence (Mikhailova et al., 2002). Mycological analysis is usually used to assess the spread of this pathogen and to estimate the prevalence of C. sativus isolates.Kazakhstani material. The isolates of tan spot were identified in all the regions. Five races of P. tritici-repentis were identified among Chelyabinsk isolates based on the toxins produced by the following pathogens: race 1 (PtrToxA PtrToxС); race 2 (PtrToxA); race 7 (PtrToxA, PtrToxВ), race 8 (PtrToxA, PtrToxВ, PtrToxС), and race 4 (does not produce toxins). Three races were identified in the Omsk region (1 -3) and four, in North Kazakhstan (1 -4). A total of 26 P. tritici-repentis phenotypes were identified by virulence analysis using 11 differential lines: two were present in all the populations; two. in Chelyabinsk and North Kazakhstan; one, in Omsk and Chelyabinsk; and all the others were original. A high degree of similarity between the obligate pathogen P. triticina and the saprophytic pathogen P. tritici-repentis in the West-Asian region of Russia and in North Kazakhstan demonstrates that this is one epidemiological region across this wheat production area. The presence of common phenotypes suggests there is a the possibility of gene exchange between the populations and this shall be considered while releasing genetically protected wheat varieties.Key words: leaf rust; tan spot; spot blotch; spring wheat; populations; virulence; Lr-genes. Most population studies of lead rust and tan spot pathogens have been carried out in independent experiments. It was relevant to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the structure of pathogens that differed in parasitic type (obligate vs. hemibiotrophic), using a similar infectious material collected in geographically remote regions. The objective of this study was to explore the population structure studies of the causative agents of leaf rust and tan spot on spring wheat based on virulence and to assess the distribution of the causative agent of spot blotch in the West-Asian region of Russia and North Kazakhstan in 2017.Wheat samples with leaf rust and leaf spot symptoms were collected from the Ural (Chelyabinsk) and the East Siberian (Omsk) region of Russia and North Kazakhstan in 2017. Leaf rust severity at the sampling locations ranged from moderate to strong and spots, from low to moderate.In the Chelyabinsk region, leaves were collected from 30 spring wheat samples in the breeding nursery of the Chelyabinsk Scientific Research Institute of Agriculture. In the Omsk region, leaves were collected from 40 wheat samples growing in the experimental fields of the Omsk State Agrarian University and Cherlak and Pavlodar state variety test plots. In Kazakhstan, infectious material was collected from commercial fields at seven points of the North Kazakhstan region and at two in the Akmola region.Leaf rust uredinia from dry leaves were renewed on a susceptible wheat variety and single pustule isolates were obtained. Isolates' multiplication for virulence analysis was carried out using a laboratory method of pathogen cultivation. Single uredinial isolates were tested for virulence to 20 near isogenic lines of Thatcher wheat that differed in single leaf rust resistance genes. Three seeds of each of these Thatcher lines were sowed to a pot filled with soil. Each set of 10-14 dayold differentials (the first leaf stage) was spray inoculated by urediniospores of each isolate (10 6 /ml) and kept in a Versatile Environmental Test Chamber (Sanyo) at optimal temperature (22 °С) and moisture (75 %) (Gultyaeva, Soloduhina, 2008). Virulent phenotypes were determined 10 days after inoculation using E.B. Mains and H.S. Jackson scale (1926), where 0 means no visible uredia; 0, hypersensitive flecks; 1, small uredia with necrosis; 2, small-to medium-sized uredia with green islands and surrounded by necrosis or chlorosis; 3, medium-sized uredia with or without chlorosis; 4, large uredia without chlorosis; Х, heterogeneous, similarly distributed over the leaves. The plants with infection types 0 to 2 were classified as resistant and infection types 3 to 4 and Х as susceptible.A differential set of 20 near isogenic TcLr-lines was used for studying the leaf rust pathogen's population structure. Each isolate was given a five-letter code based on virulence or avirulence to each of the five subsets of four differentials as adapted from the North American nomenclature for virulence in P. triticina (Long, Kolmer, 1989). The following order of sets was used: 1, Lr1, Lr2a,Lr2c,and Lr3а;2,Lr9,Lr16,Lr24,and Lr26;3,Lr3ka,Lr11,Lr17,and Lr30;4,Lr2b,Lr3bg,Lr14a,and Lr14b;5,Lr15,Lr18,Lr19, and Lr20. The first three groups were similar to the original differential set (Long, Kolmer, 1989) widely used for P. triticina population studies (Kolmer, Ordoñez, 2007;Kolmer et al., 2015). Thatcher lines highly informative for differentiation of Russian populations were included in the other two groups (Gultyaeva et al., 2017). Five-letter phenotype codes, virulence frequencies, Nei (Hs) and Shennon (Sh) indexes of population diversity were determined using Virulence Analysis Tool (VAT) software package (Kosman et al., 2008).Leaf segments with one infection spot surround by an area of green tissue were cut out for tan spot and spot blotch studies and put on agar medium V4 (Mikhailova et al., 2012). Dishes with leaf segments were incubated in a thermostat with UV lamps (LE-30) and at a temperature of 20 to 22 °С for three days and were then placed in a refrigerator (5-8 °С) for one day for stimulation of P. tritici-repentis conidia development.The frequency of P. tritici-repentis and С. sativus colonies obtained from different geographic populations was used as a criterion of the distribution of these pathogens.Reproduction of P. tritici-repentis fungus culture was carried out according to L.A. Mikhailova et al. (2012). Virulence analysis was carried out using methods of cutting leaves placed on the benzimedazole solution (0.004 %).The racial identity revealed by the ability of P. triticirepentis isolates to form the toxins Ptr ToxA, Ptr ToxB and Ptr ToxC was determined by inoculation of the cultivar Glenlea, lines 6B662 and 6B365, by the presence of necrotic and chlorotic spots on wheat leaves (Lamari, Bernier, 1989;Lamari et al., 1998).The virulence of P. tritici-repentis isolates was studied using the following set of cultivars: Allies (France); Norin 58, Satsukei 86, Hokkai 252, Komadi 3 (Japan); Riley 67, Clark (USA); Asiago (Italy); Salamouni (Egypt); and M3 (Canada), which differentiate the fungus isolates for their ability to produce necrosis and chlorosis. The type of infection caused by isolates was assessed using a five-point scale corresponding to the size of necrotic and chlorotic spots, according to Mikhailova et al. (2012). A comparison of the population samples on the basis of virulence was carried out according to the index of the average score of infection per isolate (the ratio of the sums of the points exhibited by isolates on tan spot wheat differential sets to the number of isolates). For the determination of phenotypes, only the indicator of the necrotic reaction evaluation was used, since it characterizes the result of the action of one (Ptr ToxA), and not two toxins, as in the case of a chlorotic reaction, when two independent traits appear that are identical in phenotype (Mikhailova et al., 2010). The results of the virulence evaluation of P. triticirepentis isolates were presented as a binary matrix: 1, virulence (scores 3-5); 0, avirulence (scores 0-2).The degree of genetic similarity between the Omsk, the Chelyabinsk and the North Kazakhstani populations of P. triticina and P. tritici-repentis for virulence was evaluated using Nei (Nei genetic distance, Nei D) and Fst indexes calculated by GenAlEx (Genetic analysis in Excel, 6.5 http:// biology.anu.edu.au/GenAlEx) software package.One hundred and nine single-pustule isolates -30 from Chelyabinsk, 45 from Omsk and 34 from North Kazakhstanwere characterized during the leaf rust population studies. All single-pustule isolates studied were avirulent to TcLr24.Isolates virulent to TcLr19 were detected in the Chelyabinsk population. The prevalence of isolates virulent to TcLr2a, TcLr2b, TcLr2c, TcLr11, TcLr15, TcLr16, TcLr20 and TcLr26 was higher in the Omsk and the North Kazakhstani population and of those virulent to TcLr9, in the Chelyabinsk population (Table 1). A high virulence to Lr9 in the Chelyabinsk population in comparison to the other populations studied was due to a high prevalence (10 %) of varieties with this gene in the infectious material (3 % in the Omsk population).A high efficiency of the Lr24 gene in the regions of Russian Federation is due to the absence of commercial varieties with this gene. Nevertheless, at present, Lr24 donors are used in breeding in Russia (Tyunin et al., 2017). The world practice of cultivating varieties with the Lr24 gene shows that mass cultivation is rapidly followed the emergence of virulent races and the gene loses its effectiveness. Virulence to Lr24 occurs in P. triticina populations across North America and Australia, where wheat varieties protected by this gene are widely grown (McIntosh et al., 1995).Isolates virulent to the Lr19 gene were observed only in the Chelyabinsk population and were isolated from the line protected by this gene. They were not detected on any wheat sample carrying Lr19 and Lr26 at once -not, for example, on cv. Omskaya 37 or cv. Omskaya 38. Virulence to Lr19 gene is more often noted in the Volga region, where varieties with this gene are grown, but it can also occur in other regions (Kovalenko et al., 2012;Tyunin et al., 2017). All P. triticina isolates studied virulent to TcLr19 were avirulent to TcLr26. Similar observations were made for isolates virulent to TcLr9. Expanding areas with varieties carrying Lr9 provides for increase in the frequency of isolates with virulence to Lr9 in the West Asian regions of Russia, which are as powerful accumulators of infection (Meshkova et al., 2012, Tyunin et al., 2017). To stabilize the phytosanitary situation in the Urals and West Siberia, a strategy of pyramiding the Lr9 and Lr19 genes with Lr26 and other Lr-genes may be useful, because their effective combination will help prolong the \"useful life\" of new varieties.Twenty-seven virulent phenotypes (12 from Omsk, 19 from Chelyabinsk and 8 from Kazakhstan) were determined using 20 TcLr lines (Table 2). The phenotypes TLTTR, TCTTR and TBTTR were found in all the populations studied. The phenotypes TQTTR and TGTTR were common in the Omsk and the North Kazakhstani population, while THPTR and TCTTQ were common in the Omsk and the Chelyabinsk population. A high degree of similarity by the virulence phenotypes indicates gene flow between pathogen populations in the study area in 2017. In general, no significant changes in the phenotypic composition of the Omsk and the Chelyabinsk population were observed in 2017 as compared to 2014-2016 (Tyunin et al., 2017).Analysis of the Omsk and the Chelyabinsk P. triticina population on similar sets of spring wheat showed their identical virulence on the susceptible varieties Pamyati Azieva, Omskaya 35, Saratovskaya 29 and Lutescens 857. Significant differences in virulence between the populations studied were observed for the following wheat samples: Lutescens 1103 (on the Tc-lines with genes Lr2a, Lr2b, Lr2c, Lr15, Lr16), Lutescens KS14/09-2 (Lr2a, Lr2b, Lr2c, Lr11, Lr15, Lr20), Duet (Lr2a, Lr2b, Lr2c, Lr11, Lr15, Lr16, Lr20), and moderate differences, for Novosibirskaya 16, Lutescens 37-17, Erythrospermum 1119 (Lr16), Stolypinskaya 2, GVK 2127 (Lr16, Lr20), OmGAU 100 (Lr11), Tyumenochka (Lr11, Lr20) and Element 22 (Lr11, Lr16).The Nei (Ns) and Shannon (Sh) indices, which characterize the in-population genetic diversity, showed that the Chelyabinsk population was more heterogeneous for virulence (Ns = 0.21) and phenotypic composition (Sh = 0.82) compared to the Omsk and the North Kazakhstani population (Ns = 0.09 and 0.06, Sh = 0.51 and 0.49, respectively).Nei's genetic distance (N) indicated a high similarity between the Omsk, the North Kazakhstani (N = 0.03) and the Chelyabinsk population (N = 0.05) and a moderate similarity between Chelyabinsk and North Kazakhstan (N = 0.13). The results obtained in 2017 suggest there had been no changes in the structure of the populations studied compared to the previous time (Kovalenko et al., 2012;Gultyaeva et al., 2017;Tyunin et al., 2017).For population studies in P. tritici-repentis and C. sativus, we used wheat leaves with typical visual symptoms of the diseases being discussed. In the Chelyabinsk region, nine wheat cultivars were used as infectious material: Ural'skaya kukushka, Chelyaba rannyaya, Eritrospermum 59, Iskra, Rossiyanka, Izumrudnaya, Astana 2, Tyumenochka, Tertsia; in the Omsk Region, eight: Pamyati Aziyeva, Sibakovskaya yubileynaya, OmGAU 90, Chernyava 13, Uralosibirskaya, Duet, Grani and Katyusha. In leaf samples from the North Kazakhstan region, spots was noted in six samples.A total of 466 infected samples (segments of leaves with separate spots) were studied: 125 from Omsk, 215 from Chelyabinsk, and 126 from North Kazakhstan. The prevalence of C. sativus and P. tritici-repentis isolates was 12 % and 14 %, respectively, in Omsk samples; 3 % and 25 %, in Chelyabinsk; and 0 % and 43 % in North Kazakhstan. Thus, the presence of the causative agent of spot blotch disease of wheat was stronger in the Omsk than in Chelyabinsk region. In North Kazakhstani leave samples, C. sativus was not observed. P. tritici-repentis was noted in all regions. The prevalence of P. tritici-repentis isolates was higher in North Kazakhstani and Chelyabinsk samples and lower in Omsk.Nineteen Chelyabinsk, 8 Omsk and 27 North Kazakhstani isolates of P. tritici-repentis were used to analyze the population structure on the basis of virulence and toxicity. P. tritici-repentis races identified in the three populations by toxicity are presented in Table . 3. Five races were found in the samples of the Chelyabinsk population; three, in Omsk; and four, in North Kazakhstan.The racial structure of Omsk P. tritici-repentis isolates was characterized by a higher diversity in 2017 than 2007, when two races were found: race 2 and race 7 (Mikhailova et al., 2010). Races 1 to 4 of P. tritici-repentis, which predominate in the study populations, are also widely distributed in other Russian regions (Central European and North Caucasian) (Mikhailova et al., 2010(Mikhailova et al., , 2012)).In general, a high incidence of isolates producing PtrToxA (87-95 %) was noted (see Table 3), which indicates a potential harmfulness of yellow spot in the West Siberian and the Ural region of Russia and North Kazakhstan.Twenty-six phenotypes of P. tritici-repentis were identified by virulence analysis using 11 differential cultivars (on the (Mikhailova et al., 2010). When studying the virulence of isolates on 11 tan spot wheat differential sets, it was determined that the values of the average infection type were similar in all collections studied: 1.69 (necrosis) -1.71 (chlorosis) in Chelyabinsk populations and 1.47-1.84; 1.71-1.55 in Omsk populations). The indices of genetic distances of Nei and Fst indicated a high similarity between the Chelyabinsk, Omsk and North Kazakhstani isolates of P. tritici-repentis (N = 0.02-0.05; Fst = 0.03-0.12). This indicates the presence of a shared epiphytotic zone of P. tritici-repentis in the study area.Population analysis of P. triticina and P. tritici-repentis, important wheat pathogens differing in parasitism type (obligate vs. hemibiotrophic), revealed a similarity of their structure in the West Asian regions of the Russian Federation and North Kazakhstan. Data obtained should be considered for territorial zoning of genetically protected varieties in these regions. The study of new varieties should be relevant to their resistance not only to local populations of the most prevalent pathogen in a region, but also to those races that can appear in the population due to a possible air drift from neighboring regions. Such a system of studying varieties is used in cooperation programs of the Kazakhstan-Siberian Wheat Improvement Network (KASIB). The best breeding material is tested annually at various environmental settings (the Volga Region, the Urals, West Siberia and Kazakhstan). Monitoring pathogen virulence allows coordinating strategies for placing new varieties in the study regions, prolonging their \"useful life\" and improving the ecological situation around wheat crops. ","tokenCount":"3708"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1697801611.json b/data/part_2/1697801611.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..005bcfcb3eeaa8bd576941ba1810578a941ab727 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1697801611.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"3caf676c0a83a00523315b55fcbe56ad","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/00836a92-0e06-4de1-8688-b0b2acfa5642/retrieve","id":"708127491"},"keywords":["Black Volta Basin","Crop","Dry season","Intervention","Livestock","Water productivity vii"],"sieverID":"5dd0e15d-a060-4f97-84ba-6176bb94dddb","pagecount":"73","content":"I dedicate this thesis to my loving parents, Mr. & Mrs. J. M. Quandzie, my sister Rosemond and brothers John and Anthony and my lovely Rita for their understanding, immense support and sacrifice throughout the period of my study.The Volta basin is the 9 th largest in sub-Saharan Africa (GEF- UNEP, 2002) and it is estimated to drain an area of about 400,000km² (Rodgers et al., 2007) into the Gulf of Guinea. The socio economic benefit derived from the natural resources provided by the Volta Lake is also worth noting. This basin makes up almost 28% of the total West Coast (FAO, 1997) and is shared by six riparian countries, of which Burkina Faso (46%) and Ghana (39%) share the major portion, while the remaining 15% is shared by Togo (6%), Benin (4%), Mali (3%), and Cote d'Ivoire (2%) (Barry et al. 2005). The main Volta basin is made up of four major subbasins which are the Black Volta, White Volta, Oti, and the Lower Volta sub-basins. The fresh water resources that contribute water to the Volta Lake originate from the tributaries that fall within the Volta basin. The estimated annual precipitation ranges from 1500mm per year in the south to about 400mm per year in the upper regions of the basin (FAO, 2001). Potential evaporation rates are high, ranging from 1,500mm in the south to more than 2,500mm in the north and less than 10% of the precipitation becomes useable as river flow (GLOWA-Volta, n.d.). This ultimately contributes to the somewhat perennial drought in the upper regions within the basin.The Black Volta sub-basin in the Volta basin is the study area for this research work, but will be referred to as the Black Volta basin (BVB) in the following write up. The BVB is subdivided into sub-catchments and these are the Nwokuy, Dapola, Bamboi, Noumbiel and Lerinord sub-catchments (Kirby et al. 2010). The BVB drains an area of about 149,015km²and receives an annual rainfall between 1023.3mm -1348.0mm. The mean annual flow of the Black Volta River at Bamboi measuring station is estimated to be about 200m³/s, out of which about 42.6% originate from outside Ghana (GEF-UNEP, 2002).This is an indication that a larger portion of the precipitation and its eventual runoff in the Black Volta River occurs inStephen Quandzie[2] MSc. Thesis, 2012Ghana, hence, the country as a whole and the Upper West Region in particular could maximize its benefit derived from the water resources available. In order to realize the full potential of the water resources in the BVB and in particular the portion in Ghana, the study seeks to concentrate on the Dapola, Noumbiel and Vonkoro sub-catchments which fall within the Upper West Region of Ghana. It cannot be said that the people in the Upper West Region are not benefitting from the water resources but the magnitude and impact that it is having on their lives is what must be looked at with the view of increasing it. There have been many social interventions in the region which have produced marginal benefits in the agricultural sector and economic well being of the inhabitants. Thus with all these interventions, the region according to the Ghana living standard survey ( 2008) is one of the poorest in the country. Hence, in order to better improve the livelihood of the inhabitants with particular reference to the local farmers and livestock owners, the option of providing solutions based on engineering research should be the way forward.The very crucial resource being considered has the Dublin principles (ICWE, 1992) clearly spelling out its importance; the declared principles that states that fresh water is a finite and vulnerable resource essential to sustaining life and that its management should be based on participatory approach involving users, planners, and policymakers at all levels with particular focus on women and that its economic value among competing uses should be recognised. Thus agricultural water use should be managed with this in mind. Therefore, the productivity of it should be such that maximum benefit is realised at all times and its conservation promoted.This thesis aims at how best the potential of agricultural water productivity can be increased while assessing how the productivity of agricultural land in the Upper West Region of Ghana which falls within the Black Volta basin can also be enhanced.Stephen Quandzie[3] MSc. Thesis, 2012In most African and Asian countries especially sub-Saharan countries, the growth rate of the population outstrips gains made in agriculture productivity hence, exacerbating the already existing food insecure situation. Food insecurity exists when people lack access to sufficient amounts of safe and nutritious food and therefore not consuming enough for an active and healthy life. This may be due to the unavailability of food, inadequate purchasing power, or inappropriate utilization at household level (FAO, 2002). It is known that food insecurity is progressive and occurs over a set of conditions from food secured situations to full scale famine. It can be classified as either chronic or transitory. Chronic food insecurity translates into a high degree of vulnerability to famine and hunger which mainly exist in poor developing countries.Worldwide, around 852 million people are chronically hungry due to extreme poverty, while up to 2 billion people lack food security intermittently due to varying degrees of poverty (FAO, 2003). In Sub Saharan Africa, it is estimated that about 62% (IFAD and FAO, 2008) of the population live in rural areas, are poor and engage in subsistence farming as their means of livelihood.The linkage between the rural communities, poverty alleviation, hunger reduction and rising income levels through agricultural productivity cannot be overlooked in developing countries worldwide. Increased agricultural productivity enable farmers to grow more food which translates into better diets and under market conditions, that offers a level playing field resulting in higher farm incomes. With more money, farmers are more likely to diversify production and grow higher-value crops, benefiting not only themselves, but creating a rippling effect thus affecting the regional, continental and worldwide economy as a whole (IFPRI, 2004).Stephen Quandzie [4] MSc. Thesis, 2012The Black Volta basin falls within the Upper West, Northern and Brong Ahafo regions of Ghana. Poverty levels in these regions are high with particular reference to the Northern and Upper regions, which is an undeniable fact. This has led to the migration of the youth to the south of the country to seek greener pastures which are non-existent. Unreliable rainfall pattern and harsh climatic conditions in the basin have also affected the interest of the young and educated indigenes in engaging in agricultural production in the basin. Considering that the level of agricultural production has a direct link to income level, it presupposes that most of the people engaged in this sector are poor with an accompanying low purchasing power.Undertaking this study will seek to provide key findings on the avenues, processes and systems needed in the basin to increase the potential of agricultural water productivity.This research will also contribute immensely to achieving the targets set for Millennium Development Goal (MDG) One (1) target One (1) which seeks to eradicate extreme poverty and hunger by 2015 and target One (1) Goal Seven (7) which also seeks to ensure environmental sustainability. More specifically, these targets aim at integrating the principles of sustainable development into country policies and programmes and reverse the loss of environmental resources (UN, 2011). Policy formulation in the future can be based on this study in view of the fact that it is to assess the potential for increasing agricultural water productivity in an environmentally sustainable way.Stephen Quandzie [5] MSc. Thesis, 2012The overall objective of this research is to assess the potential for increasing agricultural water productivity for the dry season agricultural activities in the Black Volta basin, Ghana. Sources: 1 Senzanje and Chimbari (2002), 2 Mamba ( 2007) cited in Houenou 2010 It is also worth noting that from Annor (2007) small reservoir can be defined in terms of surface area coverage; that is water storage system with surface area greater than one hectare but less than a hundred hectares qualifies as a small reservoir. However, the volume of stored water in most small reservoirs varies with time mostly as a function of siltation, evaporation, seepage and availability of rainfall. But due to ineffective monitoring and de-silting, though some staff gauges have been installed in some small reservoirs with irrigation schemes, most of them cannot be relied on to determine the capacity due to the fact that they were not sited correctly. Hence, a definition based on capacity will be either incorrect or misleading. In the study area however, documentation is available for most of the dams thus the height of the dam wall is documented and therefore can be relied upon for classification of the dams. Thus from the identified constraint and the mentioned availability of data on the small reservoirs in the study area, the World Bank definition for small reservoirs will be adopted for this study.These are wells which are dug by hands or drilled with machines and may be lined or unlined.It has a depth range of between 1 -7m depending on depth of water table. These wells may be dug seasonally or permanently.Chapter 2Literature ReviewStephen Quandzie [8] MSc. Thesis, 2012It is defined as a small/large natural stream of water flowing in an unlined or lined channel to the sea, lake or into another river or reservoir.A pump can be defined as a device for lifting water from inside a well of lower elevation to the ground surface. According to Asawa (2005), water pumps can be classified as either shallow or deep pumps. It is said to be deep when it is installed within the well casing with its inlet submerged below the pumping level.The definition of productivity can be given in different contexts depending on the discipline and profession. Generally, it is said to be increase in outputs not traditionally accounted for by growth/increase in production inputs. Three of these definitions will be discussed here; firstly, in the field of economics, then secondly in business organizations and thirdly, as applied in agriculture and water issues. In economics, productivity is defined as the ratio of what is produced to what is required to produce it. Hence in the context of economics, it may be thought of as a measure of production efficiency whereas in business organizations, productivity is viewed as a ratio which measures how well an organization converts input resources (materials, labor and machines) into goods and services. The latter definition on productivity acknowledges that on its own, it is not a measure of how efficient the conversion process is. In all of the above given definitions, productivity can be defined as simply the ratio of output to input. Generally, productivity can be computed in either of two ways: total or partial productivity (Molden, 1997cited in Cook et al., 2006;Yamoah-Antwi, 2009;Adu-Dankwa, 2010;Houenou, 2010).Partial productivity is generally considered as the simplest type of productivity measure; a single type of key input factor is selected for the productivity ratio. Partial productivity can be Chapter 2Stephen Quandzie [9] MSc. Thesis, 2012expressed in a number of different ways such as value-added productivity, single-factor productivity, unit cost accounting and managerial control system and efficiency ratios. In this study the concept of single-factor productivity (SFP) is adopted.Total productivity is a productivity measure that incorporates all the inputs required to produce a product or provide a service. The inputs could be grouped into conventional and unconventional categories, for as long as they contribute to the total inputs required to produce an output. From Molden (1997), total productivity is defined as the ratio of total output to the total input and also from Houenou (2010), it is the ratio of total tangible outputs to total tangible inputs. Total input in this study are all tangible inputs used for farming under the particular agricultural water management intervention. These inputs include: water, land, labor, capital, fertilizer, improved seeds and pesticides. Water and land are basic fundamental inputs required for crop production. For good yields (production) [farmers must access capital (funds)] to purchase improved seeds to plant, fertilizer to improve soil fertility, labor to prepare the land and where this activity is beyond the physical strength of farmers, machinery is employed and lastly, pesticides to control pest attacks. If all these inputs are available and appropriately applied, then good yields and high productivity will be achieved. If not, the yields will be poor and productivity low.From Mahoo et al. (2007), the United States Department of Agriculture views water productivity in three ways, and these are: i) Water use (technical) efficiency, which is defined as the mass of agricultural produce per unit of water consumed, ii) Water use (economic) efficiency, which is defined as the value of product(s) produced per unit of water volume consumed, and iii) Water use (hydraulic) efficiency, which is defined as the ratio of volume of water actually used by irrigated agriculture to the volume of water supplied. Various stakeholders in the water sector define productivity differently as shown in 2003) modified and cited in Mahoo et al. (2007) Crop water productivity as defined by Molden (1997) is the mass of production or the economic value of production measured against gross inflow, net inflow, depleted water, process depleted water or available water. It can be determined as either the physical crop water productivity (PWP) or the economic crop water productivity (EWP). Thus;• Physical crop water productivity (PCWP) is computed by dividing the crop yield by the volume of water delivered during the crop's entire growth period.• Economic crop water productivity (EWP) is calculated by dividing the income realized from sale of the crop yield by the volume of water delivered during the crop's entire growth period.In this study, crop water productivity will be considered at field (farm) scale. The formula described by Lemoalle (2006), equation (2.1), will be adopted for the computation of the physical crop water productivity, where the denominator will be considered as the volume of water applied or delivered to the crop. For the economic crop water productivity the formula adopted by Faulkner et al. (2008), equation (2.2), will be adopted for this study.Chapter 2Stephen QuandzieLivestock water productivity in agricultural systems is the ratio of the sum of animal products and services produced to the amount of water depleted in producing them (Peden and Tadasse, 2003).The sources of livestock water consumption may be, cited as (Zinash et al., 2002):• Drinking waterLivestock product and services include among others meat, milk, hide, manure, ploughing, and transport. In this study, livestock water productivity (LWP) will be computed using the formula by Peden and Tadasse (2003), equation (2.3), and cited in Houenou (2010).Agricultural land productivity measures the crop yields (t) or the income generated on sale of produce from the piece of land. Yields obtained from a plot of land also depend on the nutrients in the soil. For higher yields, the appropriated inputs such as fertilizer, improved seeds, pesticides, and labor must be used to improve the conditions under which crops grow.In this study, the sum of individual farmers' crop yields is used in the computation of agricultural land productivity (ALP), as in equation (2.4).Stephen Quandzie[12] MSc. Thesis, 2012Crop water consumption factor (CWCF) is the ratio between net crop irrigation water requirement (NIR) and the volume of water that reaches the irrigation plots and that is effectively applied to the crops throughout its specified growth period (V app ) (Willardson et al., 2002;Clemmens and Burt, 1997;Molden, 1997) as indicated in equation (2.5). Crop water consumption factor is also known as water use efficiency (Oweis et al., 2003;Kijne et al., 2003;cited in Houenou, 2010). Thus:The net crop irrigation requirement (NIR) can be computed using the CROPWAT model. The The crop coefficient, k c is a fraction of the crop type and the period of the growing season. P eff is the fraction of the total precipitation, (P) that is available to the crop and does not run off. If the right hand side of equation (2.6), is greater than zero, i.e. NIR > 0, then for the particular crop, some amount of water would have to be supplied by some irrigation method to make up for the deficit which the effective rain (P eff ) was not able to supply. If the right hand side of Chapter 2Literature ReviewStephen Quandzie[13] MSc. Thesis, 2012 equation (2.6), is equal to zero, i.e. NIR = 0, then there would be no need to irrigate since the effective rain (P eff ) is equal to the standard evapotranspiration (ET c ) of the particular crop through its various growth stages. And in the situation where NIR < 0, it shows that the effective rain was more than the ET c , and irrigation would not be required. In other words the soil field capacity is likely to be exceeded and runoff or a waterlogged situation may come into existence.According to Smith (1991), effective rainfall can be calculated using common empirical methods that are based on actual rainfall data. These are:• Fixed percentage of rainfallWhere P eff is the effective precipitation; the fixed percentage is to be given by the user to account for the losses due to runoff and deep percolation, with typical values ranging from 0.7 to 0.9; and P is the measured or generated total monthly rainfall.• Dependable rainfall FAO developed this empirical formula to estimate dependable rainfall; it may be used for design purposes where 80% of probability of exceedance is required. Calculation is monthly step based.For P month ≤ 70mm; P eff = 0.6 x P -10(mm) (i.e. for a time step of every Ten-days) (mm/dec)For P month > 70mm; P eff = 0.8 x P -24(mm) (i.e. for a daily time step) (mm/day)The USDA Soil Conservation Service method for the calculation effective rain is indicated below. Calculation is monthly step based.For P month < 250mm; P eff = P month x (125 -0.2P month ) / 125For P month > 25mm; P eff = 125 + 0.1 x P monthWhere, P eff is effective rainfall and P month is total monthly rainfall (mm/dec).Chapter 2Literature ReviewStephen Quandzie [14] MSc. Thesis, 2012It must be clearly noted that for this thesis work the worst case scenario of assuming that there was no rains during the plant growing period was adopted, hence, P eff is assumed to be zero.That is the amount of water required by particular crops throughout their growing period is solely supplied by means of irrigation methods.Potential evapotranspiration, ET o is calculated using FAO Penman-Monteith equation (Allen et al., 1998) below with parameters of temperature, relative humidity, sunshine hours, and wind speed. To compute the net crop irrigation requirement, CROPWAT model requires the data below from the nearest meteorological station and research station or field:• Crop data -the crop type and planting date.• Climatic data -mean monthly maximum and minimum temperatures ( o C), monthly rainfall (mm), relative humidity (%), sunshine duration (hours) and wind speed (m/s).• Information on meteorological station; country, name, altitude, latitude, longitude.Chapter 3Stephen Quandzie[15] MSc. Thesis, 2012The portion of the Black Volta basin (BVB), in which the Upper West Region of Ghana is located is described in this chapter. The Location and Size, Population, Vegetation and Land use, Climate, Relief and Drainage, Soil characteristics, Geological Setting, HydrogeologicalSetting, and Socio-economic characteristics are described in this section.The BVB is located approximately between latitudes 7.5ºN and 11ºN and covers about 21% of the whole Volta basin (Mote, 1997). It is made up of five sub-catchments namely Lerinord, Nwokuy, Dapola, Noumbiel and Bamboi. The total catchment area of the basin is 149,015km² with about 23.6% of it in Ghana (GEF-UNEP, 2002). The BVR flows through these riparian countries: southern Mali (source), southwestern Burkina Faso, northeastern Ivory Coast and Ghana. These countries contribute portions of their national lands to make up the Black Volta basin. In Ghana, there are thirteen (13) main tributaries with its accompanying catchment areas draining into the BVR (Barry et al., 2005).The Socio-demographic analysis for the BVB in Ghana specifically has not been done, since the basin encompasses wholly or partially some districts in the various regions contributing to the catchment of the BVB. The census done in the country is based on the administrative demarcation of regional lands. But Nabila (1997) in his report made some assumptions and presented Table 3 The vegetation of the BVB is that of the typical Guinea savannah according to Chipp (1922) and it's no different from what pertains in the UWR. The vegetation is characterised by short grasses (tussock grasses dominating) and from Agorsah (2003) in GWI (2009) the trees in the BVB are short (< 20m high), thick barks which are fire hardy with the ability to reproduce from dormant buds. Thus, it forms new leaves and some flower just before the beginning of the rains. Some trees with economic value can also be identified in the BVB and these include mango (Mangifera indica), shea butter (Butyrospermum parkii), Dawadawa (Adansonia digitata) and the Baobab. These attributes of the larger BVB can be said to apply to the UWR of Ghana. The majority of the land is rural and its main use is for agricultural production and free range livestock grazing. It is only in the district capitals that some lands are being used for commercial and industrial purposes. The BVB is characterised by a considerable variations in the relief system. A large portion of the basin in Ghana falls within the Guinea savannah zone which is characterised by gentle undulating slopes from north to south, hence promoting surface flow. Mote (1997) in GWI(2009) has it that the topography of the northern sector ranges between 300mm and 600mm above sea level. From the MWRWH (1998) the mean annual runoff of the Black Volta River (BVR) is 7,673 x 10 6 m 3 . The BVR together with its tributaries such as Kamba, Kuno, Bakpong, etc. drain parts of the Upper West Region (UWR).The BVB in Ghana and specifically the UWR is in the Guinea Savannah zone which according to Barry et al. (2005) contains much less organic matter, hence is lower in nutrients. The BVB in Ghana is underlain generally by three main geological formations, Chapter 3Stephen Quandzie[19] MSc. Thesis, 2012 namely: the Birimian, Granite and the Voltaian rocks formation and to a minor extent the Tarkwaian system (Barry et al., 2005). The UWR is underlain by the upper and lower birimian and associated granite and the granite formation. The soils in these areas mainly consist of savannah ochrosols and groundwater laterites (Andah et al., 2003) which give rise to the presences of sandy, sandy loam and laterite. According to FAO (1967), the floodplain soils along the BVR vary from brown sandy clays to silty clays loams. This patchy geology, according to Blench (2006) may well explain why farming systems are so diverse across the UWR.The geological formation of the BVB has a direct bearing on the groundwater occurrence. The rocks in the basin and the region are essentially impermeable and therefore lack primary porosity (Kortatsi, 1997). Secondary porosity development is responsible for the groundwater occurrence. Kortatsi (1997) has it that there are two main aquifer systems in the basin namely:weathered aquifers and the fissured aquifers.The weathered zone aquifers usually occur at the base of thick weathered layers which vary between 0 -100m (Barry et al., 2005). According to the MWRWH (1998) and also as cited in Barry et al. (2005) the yield of these aquifers rarely exceeds 6m³/h.The fissured aquifers are normally discontinuous and limited in area; their occurrence is in fresh rocks and is generally deeper and high yielding than the weathered zone aquifers. This is because fissured aquifers usually occur below the weathered zone.The BVB in Ghana and the UWR in particular is noted to be one of the poorest regions where indigenes live on less than a dollar a day, the standard set under the Millennium Development Goals. The inhabitants who are mostly farmers engage themselves in both minor and major season farming and also livestock rearing to generate income for their livelihood and sustenance.Chapter 3Stephen Quandzie[20] MSc. Thesis, 2012The tourism industry in the region is one of the less tapped potentials; the region is known to have a wide variety of cultural displays such as the Damba and Nandonei Bawa dance. The region is also known to have the hippo sanctuary at Wechiau where tourists can be exposed to viewing and some income generated from that.Commerce between the region and the neighbouring Burkina Faso cannot be over looked.Thus it's a location where trading activities between the southwestern Burkina Faso and the northwestern Ghana takes place, thus goods from the southern Ghana are sent to be sold. IntroductionThe study adopted the following research methodologies for the selection of Agricultural Water Management interventions, determination of crop water consumption factor, crop and livestock water productivities, and agricultural land productivity. These include collection of data through desk studies, reconnaissance survey, questionnaire administration, interviewswith key informants, focus group discussions, field measurement and observation and the use of secondary data.The The definition for small reservoirs as indicated earlier in this document was used to select some small reservoirs in the BVB catchment portion of the Upper West region, and also these small reservoirs must have a multiple use character. The next was proximity and accessibility to these selected sites and the availability of some secondary data on these structures and sites. After extensive consultation with key high level officials of MoFA and GIDA, seven of these sites were chosen for detailed study.Chapter 4Stephen Quandzie[23] MSc. Thesis, 2012The methods and strategies used in collecting data and vital information for this thesis work is described in detail below.High level stakeholder meeting was held at which regional directors and some departmental heads of some organisations involved in the agricultural sector attended. Interviews were conducted with key high level stakeholders which included; regional directors and some departmental heads of MoFA and GIDA on the selection of intervention sites, crop and agricultural land productivities. A follow up reconnaissance survey was conducted to the respective sites. At these sites, questionnaires were administered mainly to dry season farmers as indicated in Plate 1 below. This was done with the help and assistance of some AEAs who acted as translators. They assisted the farmers fill out the questionnaire to provide data on the various uses of the small reservoirs, the various crops grown in the dry season, the crops growing period, the crops yields, the irrigation methods used. Data on the various farm planting inputs used and their respective cost were also gathered.Plate4.1: Questionnaire Administration to Some Farmers at Gbetuore, Black Volta River BankChapter 4Stephen Quandzie[24] MSc. Thesis, 2012After the administration of questionnaire to the randomly selected farmers, the WUA's executives, the leaders of the farmers, some few farmers were brought together to have a FGD to discuss and verify the data gathered through the questionnaire administration at the particular intervention sites. The discussions bordered on issues such as labour charges, irrigation frequency for that site, time and days for irrigating and farm gate prices of crops in the 2011 dry season among others. Observational walks were conducted at the various intervention sites to confirm some of the information gathered through the interviews and FGD's.MoFA and GIDA provided some official records within which some data was extracted on some of the identified interventions in the study area. The data included some information on the full supply level (FSL), live and dead storages, storage capacity and size of irrigable area of the chosen small reservoirs. The type of crops, some market prices of crops and some intervention introduction dates were also obtained. Productivity standards for the crops were also obtained.The dimensions of some randomly selected farm plots, beds and planting ridges were measured on the field to get first hand information and also to confirm some of the information received from the WUA executives, MoFA and GIDA officials. Depth of shallow wells dug on the farms was noted. The farm gate weight of locally accepted standard means of selling produce was weighed and noted with its corresponding prices. The geographic locations of the various intervention sites was recorded using a hand held GPS set. At sites where farmers were using bucket and line/rope to draw water from the shallow wells located at vantage points on the farm and/or from the main canal and laterals unto their beds or ridges to water the crops, the volume of water fetched was randomly measured at three different At sites where the farmers were using motorized pumps to irrigate their farms, the pumping rates (discharge rate) for some of the pumps were determined through using containers that had been calibrated with standard one litre measuring cup to determine their volumes and a stopwatch to measure the time to fill up. The volume of water applied in watering the crops on the field for the entire crop growing period were determined using equation (4.1) below:Where V app = volume of water applied in (m³) or (cu.m), NID = number of irrigation days for entire dry season (days), Du = duration of irrigation per day (seconds/minutes/hours), PR = pumping rate (m³/s).At sites where farmers were using water released from small reservoirs by the opening of valves to allow water to flow through canals and laterals to fill furrows on the fields of farmers for irrigation, the volume of water applied was measured by firstly, taking the dimensions of the main canal and laterals of the particular scheme and recorded. The depth of flow and wetted perimeter were also measured and noted. The water surface velocity was Stephen Quandzie[26] MSc. Thesis, 2012 measured using the float method. Five readings were taken and the average found and used in the computation of the surface velocity. This was done using equation ( 4.2); it is a formula adopted from USEPA (1997) as indicated below:Where L = distance (m) over which the time 't' (s) was recorded and 0.8 is the reduction factor since not all the water flows with the same velocity both at the bottom and at the surface as in the JICA's technical guidelines for irrigated agriculture ( 2004) and cited in Adu-Dankwa ( 2010).The discharge (Q) of water was computed using equation ( 4.3) as indicated:Where A = flow area (m²) and V = average velocity (m/s) of flow as computed using equation (4.2) above.Note: the stop valve was fully opened to allow maximum flow as it is the normal practise on every irrigation day. And also it must be stated that the scope of the work did not include losses due to seepage and leakages, so were not considered in the computations in this thesis work. Since the study was done at the farm/field level, loss here may not be losses when viewed at the basin scale.The volume of water applied to the field was found using the relation in equation (4.1) above by replacing the pumping rate (PR) with the discharge rate in equation ( 4.3). The irrigation duration is the time taken for the furrows on the field to get filled up. At other plots and sites where this was not appropriate, dimensions of furrows were taken and the time it takes for water to fill up was noted and subsequently the volume found per the number of furrows on the field.Chapter 4Stephen Quandzie[27] MSc. Thesis, 2012The crop water consumption factor (CWCF) is the ratio of the net crop irrigation water requirement (NIR) to the volume of water that is effectively applied to the crop on the field for the entire growth period specified (V app ). This ratio according to Oweis et al. (2003) and Kijne et al. (2003) is also known as the crop water use efficiency.The net crop irrigation water requirement (volume of water required by crops throughout its growth period) (NIR) was computed using the FAO CROPWAT 8.0 model, which is based on equation (2.6). This was done by accessing secondary climatic data of the Wa meteorological station from the FAO CLIMWAT 2.0 model. Intervention site specific coordinates (latitude, longitude and altitude) were taken with the GPS hand held set which also served as input data for the CROPWAT 8.0 model. The effective rainfall for this study work was set at zero. This is to take care of a worst case scenario which is normally what happens in the dry season in that part of the country. The crop water consumption factor for the selected crops was computed using the relation in equation (4.4) above for the various specific intervention sites.Agricultural Water Productivity QuantificationThe crop water productivity for this thesis work was determined for both physical and economic (monetary) agricultural water productivities.Physical crop water productivity (PCWP) was computed using equation (4.5) below:Chapter 4Stephen Quandzie[28] MSc. Thesis, 2012The crop yield (kg) for the dry season of 2011 was gathered through interviews, focus group discussions and physical measurement with digital scale at the farm gate. Gardeners estimated their yields in the locally accepted means such as crates, basins, sacks, and bowls. Some of the farm produce were measured at the farm gate to confirm the weights given by MoFA monitoring and evaluation officers at the various district offices. Also, local agricultural extension agents in these areas gave some information to corroborate what the gardeners had given in terms of yields. The economic (monetary) water productivity was computed based on the following relation:Income Obtained from the sale of the crop yield (GH¢) was computed as: Crop Yield (kg) x Price of crop per unit weight (GH¢/kg).Local economic situation influences the prices of the crops from season to season and the glut of a particular crop also reduces the market price. This also affects the type of vegetables farmers' plant in the subsequent seasons.The crop water productivity for the selected crops based on the various interventions was then computed. These were then compared with FAO values for same crops grown in semi-arid and arid regions under optimum irrigation water and agricultural management practises to see if there exist the potential to increase the agricultural water productivities. For this study, the assumption made is that all other factors contributing to the production of the crop were at the optimum level and the varying variable is the agricultural water. A common basis for comparison of agricultural water productivity is needed, so the FAO ranges for good yields in (t/ha) for semi-arid and arid regions were converted into physical crop water productivity (PCWP) by dividing the minimum value of the stated range by the net crop water requirement ¢ Chapter 4Stephen Quandzie[29] MSc. Thesis, 2012(assuming a 100% crop water consumption factor). Table 4.2 shows the FAO ranges for good yields and physical crop water productivity. The livestock (cattle, sheep and goat) average selling prices for the past dry season were taken as the respective product revenue or income. The income realised from using cattle for other on farm and off farm activities were noted. This information was collected through interviews with livestock owners who are also mostly crop farmers, questionnaire administration, and focus group discussions. The volume of water consumed by the livestock in a day was also gathered through the same means as mentioned above.The livestock off farm activities income was for the entire season. And the matured age for the selected livestock ranged between 5 -5.5 and 1 -1.5 respectively for cattle and sheep/goat. The main focus of the work is on the 2011 dry season and also to create a uniform ¢ ¢ Chapter 4Stephen Quandzie[30] MSc. Thesis, 2012 basis for comparison of productivities (crop and livestock), the average selling price of the matured livestock were divided by its age (months) to obtain the average annual cost. This was further reduced to five months, thus representing the dry season. Secondary data on estimated water consumption by livestock per day per head was obtained from the \"Water For Animals\" (FAO, 1986) which gave estimates for voluntary water intake of livestock under Sahelian conditions as 27 L/day/head for cattle and 5 L/head/day for sheep/goat. Also, according to estimates made in 2000 by ONEA (National Board of Water and Sanitation) in Burkina Faso and cited in Houenou (2010), water consumption for cattle per day per head is 39.2 L/day/head and that for sheep/goat is 4.3 L/day/head. Table 4.3 shows the computation of livestock water productivity.Note: This study takes into consideration only the amount of water consumed by livestock (drinking water) because the animals normally feed in the wild (free range).Chapter 4Stephen Quandzie[31] MSc. Thesis, 2012The agricultural land productivity is also a productivity indicator used in assessing agricultural farming systems or interventions. This is done by noting the crop yield in tonnes and the land size on which the yield was realised. The land size that is allocated to or plot size in the irrigable area were measured and recorded. This was done in two ways; measuring tape was used in areas where the boundaries of the farmland were accessible. And in areas where there were difficulty accessing farmland boundaries, the ridges or bed sizes were measured and the total number noted and also the furrow sizes measured and the total number on the farmland noted. These were finally added to arrive at an approximate farmland size. The agricultural land productivity was then computed using equation (4.8) below:Results and DiscussionsStephen Quandzie[32] MSc. Thesis, 2012The agricultural water management interventions being used in the Black Volta Basin portion of the Upper West region of Ghana were identified through desk studies, key informant interviews and high level stakeholder meeting organised for key organizations and governmental departments involved in the agricultural sector, after a reconnaissance survey and observational assessment was conducted at the intervention sites to acquire first-hand information. This process finally resulted in the selection of seven intervention sites and three crops for detailed studies. Table 5.1 below gives location, type of irrigation scheme, water abstraction method, and water delivery and application mechanisms. Table 5.2 below gives intervention sites and the major crops grown there. The CWCF gives indication of how the volume of water applied to the crops on the field based on the various interventions are performing. The FAO optimum level is set at 100%, so to give indication as to over irrigation or under irrigation, the CWCF field values were computed using equation (4.4) and the obtained values subtracted from the FAO standard to indicate actual levels of water deficit or over irrigation. Thus, from the CROPWAT model, the net irrigation requirement (NIR) for the crops taken into consideration, the specific locations for the various sites, specific values of the NIR for the crops were generated. So for the crops requiring the specific NIR and assuming that the same volume was applied on the field, then the CWCF for the FAO standard become zero, i.e. CWCF (Theoretical CROPWAT) -CWCF (Volume applied on field) gives indication of over irrigation or deficit water needed to be supplied. Hence for FAO standards, the value will be zero and will be the Results and DiscussionsStephen Quandzie[34] MSc. Thesis, 2012wastage. Thus for Babile and Yeliyili, the amount of water delivered to tomato and pepper are about 74% -87% more than it requires as indicated in Fig. 5.1 and 5.2 below. Thus with this intervention, water stress is not a problem hence, it's an indication that the agricultural water productivity can be greatly increased under this intervention. This can be achieved by giving the WUA executives training on good water management practises needed on such AWM intervention sites and farmers also trained on the required and needed agronomic practises which are prudent for such crops under this intervention.The AWM interventions under which the delivery and application of water to the crops on the field are undertaken with a line/rope, bucket and calabash are prevalent at the Busa and Bihee sites. It can be seen from Fig. 5.1 and 5.2 below that under this intervention, there is quite a good water volume applied. Although pepper at Busa site experienced water deficit of about 25.4% compared to the FAO standard, this needs to be supplied to prevent water stress, since once a crop undergoes water stress its yield is affected and reduced. This intervention gives the farmers the free hand to apply water to the crops whenever necessary. So they should be trained on the right agronomic practises to use with this intervention. This intervention has a lot of drudgery associated with it but this can be reduced by the use of the right type of treadle pumps which will re-channel the farmer's energy into increasing the crop water productivity at the sites.The intervention which makes use of motorized pumps, hoses, pipes and furrows as abstraction, delivery, and application mechanisms are used at two sites namely Siiru and Kunzokala. The intervention at Siiru has an earth lined main canal from which motorized pumps are used to abstract water onto the field for application. This system at Siiru has proven from the Fig. 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 below to be applying quite a good amount of water but for tomato, it can be seen that some amount of over irrigation is occurring. At the Kunzokala site, it was observed that there was no intake valve hence, no canal leading to the irrigable area. Thus farmers mount and pump water through pipes and hoses to far distances to apply to Chapter 5Results and Discussions the crops on the field, thus increasing the water losses through leakages along the pipes and hoses. This can partly be the reason for the site experiencing water deficit for both tomato and pepper. It was also observed that the irrigable area was gravelly in nature. The farmers at the site were actively practising mulching and the use of manure on their farms. Thus at this site the provision of an intake valve and a main canal will help reduce the water deficit being experienced.The riverine water intervention being practised along the BVR at Gbetuore has proven from Fig. 5.2, that the water deficit of about 8.17% being experienced can easily be supplied so that the optimum FAO valve for pepper can be obtained for maximum productivity of the river water being pumped. At this site, it was observed that farmers were farming close to the river banks with no buffer in place to protect the river and nature. The figures below are the CWCF for the various agricultural water management interventions with respect to the indicated crop. Results and DiscussionsStephen Quandzie[36] MSc. Thesis, 2012 Results and DiscussionsStephen Quandzie[37] MSc. Thesis, 2012Crop Water ProductivitiesFrom Table 5.3 below, it can be seen that the PCWP values differ from site to site with respect to the various interventions and crops. It is also clear that the obtained field values are very low as compared to the FAO standard values for semi-arid to arid areas. But the PCWP values with respect to the identified AWM intervention showed that the farmers in Busa and Bihee obtained higher values for tomato. Thus, these farmers using the shallow wells and buckets are making quite productive use of the available agricultural water. The worst performing intervention was at Babile and Yeliyili sites for the crops studied. Here the delivery of water to the field is by gravitational force. The present operational system in place is making a lot of water go to waste in terms of crop production. The farmers and the WUA executives should be trained properly and monitored on the use and amount of water required and delivered to the field for the various crops. Also the furrow dimensions which is appropriate and the planting technology needed to be used for the specific soil type in the area must be made known to the farmers. Thus under this system, greater improvement can be Chapter 5Stephen Quandzie[38] MSc. Thesis, 2012 made in the agricultural water productivity and crop productivity increased in proportional terms.The PCWP of interventions that involves the use of motorized pumps can also do better for the crops studied. The planting/cropping system to be used with this intervention with respect to the different crops can be made available to the farmers by either the irrigation agronomist or the agricultural extension agent whose territory these interventions are present, in order to attain the optimum FAO standards for all the crops. This intervention also allows the farmers the free will to decide when exactly to irrigate the fields and for how long.It must however be noted that the PCWP at all the intervention sites will be affected in one way or another by other factors such as soil type and corresponding soil nutrients, disease and pest attack and also soil and moisture conservation practices. Improved seeds and general farm maintenance such as weeds control also counts.The EWP is income realised from the sale of the crop yield divided by the amount of water measured on the field for irrigation through the entire growth period of each particular crop.As expressed in equation (4.6), the following values in Table 5.4 were obtained. From Fig. 5.4, 5.5, 5.6 and 5.7 below it is observed that a high PCWP value corresponds to a high EWP value at all the intervention sites. The differences in the EWP values show that the local prices of crop produced differ from site to site and depending on the time of the season, the local market prices of some produce are worth more than others. But in general terms a good yield produces a better economic value when the market is right.Chapter 5Stephen Quandzie[40] MSc. Thesis, 2012 Stephen Quandzie [41] MSc. Thesis, 2012 From literature (FAO, 2010), tomato, pepper, and onion are said to be very sensitive to both over-irrigation and under-irrigation. In both instances, the yields of these crops are affected hence the optimum PCWP level will not be achieved. FAO (2010) suggests it that tomato is sensitive to variations in temperature, humidity, sunshine and wind speed. Thus high humidity increases pest and disease attack and fruit rotting. High humidity, strong winds and low sunshine leads to excessive vegetative growth, poor fruit production which culminates into reduced yields. There is also disease attack when waterlogging occurs. Water deficit immediately after transplanting and during flowering and fruit formation causes a reduction in the yield.According to (FAO, 2010), pepper suffers greater yield losses when there is water deficit just before and during the early flowering stage. This affects yield greatly and waterlogging also causes leaf shedding and poor fruit setting to the plant and also rotting during the fruit ripening stage. Onion is sensitive to soil salinity and over-irrigation and under-irrigation.Water deficit at the fruit formation stage and over-irrigation at all stages leads to the reduction in growth and poor yields.Chapter 5Stephen Quandzie[43] MSc. Thesis, 2012In Fig. 5.1 above, Kunzokala site shows a water deficit of about 10% of the NIR for tomato as Babile and Yeliyili gave indication of about 87% over-irrigation at both sites. This may be partly contributing to the low PCWP being realised at these sites. For Fig. From the questionnaire administered to farmers/livestock owners, key informant interviews, and organised focus group discussions it came out clear that the dominant livestock being reared were cattle, sheep and goats. The cattle mostly were kept for commercial as well as for other social functions. It was made known that depending on the herd of cattle a family or individual owns, the higher their social status in the community. They were also kept for prestige and pride and also as investment for the young members of the family to fall on in future when they need money. In communities visited as part of the studies, cattle was not used for transportation or ploughing as it is the case in other parts of the country. Here, owners keep them for their meat and for other social functions such as marriage.Occasionally, matured and healthy livestock are sold out to other farmers for breeding purposes.In computing the cattle water productivity, this study took into account the income made out of selling matured livestock and for ploughing during the main season. The other products such as milk and skin for leather were not considered because they are not sold but few of the Chapter 5Stephen Quandzie[44] MSc. Thesis, 2012owners and other individuals make use of them when necessary. In the case of sheep and goat they were kept and sold for supplementary income for the up keep of the home and also used for some customary rituals and ceremonies. It must be noted clearly that water for feed preparation and for slaughtered livestock processing to get the finished products for final consumption were not included in the computation of LWP because of lack of available data.From the analysis done in Table 5.5, sheep water productivity was higher than that of goats because they are preferred by Muslims for sacrifices and also because they are larger in size than the goats although their daily water consumption is approximately the same. Cattle had the highest water productivity of them all. The daily water consumption for these animals in the study areas showed no significant difference from similar works done by Houenon (2010) in Burkina Faso and Yamoah-Antwi (2009) in the Upper East region of Ghana and FAO (1986) in sub-sahelian countries. The water productivities per cattle, sheep and goat were found to be respectively: 84.5GH¢/m³, 32.43GH¢/m³ and 25.48GH¢/m³. With this, there is a clear indication that livestock water productivities under the prevailing conditions are higher than that of crops water productivities in the study areas.Chapter 5Stephen Quandzie Livestock had high water productivity as compared to crops but it is worth noting that water for feed production and processing of livestock to get finished products were not considered.Cattle in this part of the catchment were not used for any farm base activity nor for transportation during the dry season.It also came out that the crops PCWP, EWP and ALP were generally low as compared to FAO standards for areas having such biophysical characteristics. It was noted that local market forces existing in an area influences the EWP of particular crops in that locality.This research can conclude that efficient application of agricultural water to crops at the right time produced good yields under good agronomic practices and that farmers' knowledge on crop water requirement for particular crops is virtually non-existent.Chapter 6Stephen Quandzie[48] MSc. Thesis, 2012From the study the following recommendations are made:• That GIDA and MoFA should employ competent water resources engineers and managers to help advice, design and develop strategies to improve and sustain agricultural water productivities for the country with the three northern regions in focus.• Training sections and seminars be organised for farmers, irrigation agronomist and agricultural extension agents on water management and crop water requirements to help reduce water wastage at the intervention sites.• Further research should be conducted at each specific intervention location to ascertain site specific biophysical parameters and impact of farmer attitude on the interventions in order to establish its influence on PCWP and develop strategies to boost EWP of crops grown in the dry season.• Further research is needed in the field of livestock water productivity which will take into consideration water used in producing livestock feed and water used in the processes to get finished products on to markets.","tokenCount":"8521"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1702051361.json b/data/part_2/1702051361.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1717781b8f84dc100cb9fde1a6c32aeb868adf24 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1702051361.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"70342d02a7bbb1300f152c363aa63341","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/fea9d4c8-2035-4339-b7e5-61c8b7c3f4b4/retrieve","id":"-133466162"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"0ecb1570-b50e-44d8-abce-35aeb71c28df","pagecount":"21","content":"The capacity development need assessment initiative is part of the feed and forage innovation value chain of the Accelerating Impact of CGIAR Climate Research in Africa (AICCRA) project of Ethiopian. AICCRA is a three years (2021-2023) project that operates in six African countries including Ethiopia. The project is supported by a grant from the International Development Association (IDA) of the World Bank and will enhance research and capacity-building activities by CGIAR and its partners. AICCRA in Ethiopia aims to strengthen the capacity of targeted national partners and stakeholders of CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) East Africa to access and implement at scale validated climate-smart agriculture technologies, climate information services, and climate-informed digital ag-advisories to build the resilience of agri-food systems. The value chains considered for AICCRA project in Ethiopia include beans, wheat, small ruminant and livestock feed and forge options.The AICCRA project in Ethiopia has eight research activities. Livestock feed and forage options value chain contributes to four of the eight activities, which include capacity building to support implementation of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) technology packages; identification of climate-and gender and social inclusion-smartness of CSA packages; prioritization and awareness increase of best-bet CSA options and approaches for key value chains; and integration of climate-smart options and tailored CSI advisory systems for specific value chains. The current report on capacity need assessment is one of the three deliverables that the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) Africa RISING research team promised to produce and submit for AICCRA-Ethiopia project in 2021.Despite having one of the highest number of livestock in Africa, the Ethiopian traditional livestock management system is not responding to the expected contributions of the sector. Difficulties of getting reliable and quality livestock feed resources, poor post-harvest feed handling, and utilization practices are critical constraints of Ethiopia's livestock sector, along with other key constraints such as animal health and breeding services (Mekonnen et al. 2021).The feed resource base in the mixed farming system of the Ethiopian highlands has been declining due to the continual conversion of grazing lands to arable lands and concomitant loss of fertility/land degradation on the remaining pasture lands. This has forced farmers to heavily rely on feeding crop residues to their livestock. For a sustainable improvement in crop-livestock productivity, it is therefore imperative to improve the feed resource base of the mixed farming system in the highlands by introducing well-adapted and high yielding fodder crops and efficient utilization practices (Mekonnen et al. 2021).The Africa Research in Sustainable Intensification for the Next Generation (Africa RISING) project in the Ethiopian highlands has introduced integrated feed and forage development interventions such as cultivated forages, fodder trees, improved feeding troughs, feed conservation practices and storage sheds in the Ethiopian highlands to address livestock feed and forage related challenges that can contribute to the improvement of livestock productivity, income diversification and household nutrition (https://africarising.net/ethiopian-highlands/). While Africa RISING feed and forage research and scaling work reached significant number of beneficiaries, there are plenty of rooms for improvement and scaling. A recent paper by Mekonnen et al (2021) on Africa RISING achievements highlighted the importance of continued capacity building for farmers and extension staff to create awareness and build their technical capacity. The authors also highlighted the importance of taking an integrated approach that addresses policy, planning and operation related constraints of feed and forage innovations. Further scaling, the authors argued, also requires tackling critical bottlenecks such as the weak forage seed system requiring special attention.The AICCRA initiative aims at building on Africa RISING and related CGIAR based feed and forage innovations in Ethiopia and scaling them in wider geographies and beneficiaries. The feed and forage innovation scaling component of the initiative has various components including technical capacity building through tailored training, assessing climate-smartness and social inclusiveness of feed and forage innovations, developing risk communication materials for various media and platforms among others. This report presents scaling activities related to the first component of the initiative, capacity building through tailored training programs for farmers, extension, media and finance related partners. This report aims at reporting the results of the training needs assessment study conducted among various partners and the implications of the results for the training module preparation.Before starting off a training, trainers need to conduct training needs assessment even when the training needs seem apparent. Brown (2002) identified four reasons why it is worth to conduct training needs assessment. First, training needs assessment could help to identify specific problem areas in an organization that could get solved through training. Second, training needs assessments could help in securing essential management support for planned training programs. Third, when properly done, training needs assessments could help in data collection on changes brought about by training delivery. Finally, training needs assessments could help in justifying the benefit of training vis-à-vis the costs involved.A training need is said to be a gap between current and desired results. The needs may arise at outcome, output and/or product levels. Gaps could also be categorized in terms of 'means', including process and input. The process aspect includes methods, approaches, and interaction. The input aspect includes resources required. In broad terms training needs assessment is a process for identifying training needs and placing them in priority (Iqbal and Khan 2011).Depending on resources availability and buy-in from management, training needs assessment could take either light or deep forms. The light forms could be informal needs assessments through observation and informal meetings with employees and managers. The deep forms could take a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches. Both the light and deep forms of training needs assessment could be done at organization, task or individual levels (Priyadarshini and Dave, 2012). Qualitative data collection methods such as observations, key informant interviews and focus group discussions could be used to explore competency gaps and training needs. The findings of the qualitative study could then be used to generate quantitative data collection tools using survey methods (Brown, 2002).Training needs assessment also has its critics. On the one hand, organizations often use strategic business/organizational needs, not the results of a training needs assessment (TNA) to develop training plans. Hence, there is a need to convince line managers to conduct a training needs assessment even when it appears like they already seem to know the training they need for their employees. On the other hand, trainings are only one alternative to solve organizational problems. TNAs may lead to proposition of training as the only/main solution. That is why training needs assessments need to involve at least two phases. The study comprising of two phases. The first, diagnostic phase identifies inconsistencies among performance standard then ranks the inconsistencies by prioritizing them. The second curative phase finds out the root causes of the inconsistencies, and then decides on whether to use training, non-training or a combination of solutions (Iqbal and Khan 2011).The objectives of the training needs assessment were 1. To understand the technical capacity gaps of AICCRA climate-smart feed and forage sector partners 2. To get insight into the topics that need to be included in AICCRA training module preparation on climate-smart feed and forage innovationsThe training needs assessment study consisted of desk review, qualitative assessment and quantitative survey. The desk review looked into various Africa RISING related documents such as bi-annual reports, presentations, posters and briefs to identify technical gaps that challenge the feed and forage innovation partners. The study then went on with an exploratory qualitative study with key informants (KI). Actors for KI were identified from various sectors directly and indirectly linked with Africa RISING livestock feed and forage production and utilization research and scaling initiatives. Accordingly, 19 KIs were drawn from the following:• Forage producing farmers• Cooperatives/unions engaged in forage seed multiplication• Extensions offices at regional, zonal and woreda levels• Research centres (Areka, Debre Birhan, Sinana, Holetta)• Universities (Debre Birhan, Wachemo and Madda Walabu)• Non-governmental organizations (Inter Aide, Send a Cow, SNV)• Microfinance institutions and banks• Private seed suppliers• MediaThe qualitative study was followed by a structured survey. A structured web-based, quantitative survey questionnaire was developed using MS Forms and shared a link to respondents which can be easily opened on mobile phones or computers. A printed version questionnaire was also used to get the responses of farmers and other targeted stakeholders. The questionnaire included 14 broad questions and was categorized into two parts. The first part has covered general questions about respondents including their gender, age range, educational status, and contact details. The second part consisted of closed and open questions. The closed questions were designed to rate the 14 shortlisted training topics and to assess whether the respondents got training on the stated topics with 12 months. Respondents were asked to rate training topics using a five-point Likert scale, i.e., strongly disagree (1), disagree (2), neutral (3), agree (4), and strongly agree (5) which have direct relevance and priority for their work. These training topics were summarized from the KIIs and considered important for multiple stakeholders to expand their knowledge, attitude and skills on the livestock feed and forage production and utilization.Besides, the open questions were devised to gather any training topics that might not be included in the list and any comments from the respondents. Descriptive statistics (i.e., mean and percentage) was used to analyse data from 109 respondents using MS Excel.The exploratory qualitative study multiple challenges and gaps associated with the livestock feed and forage production and utilization. The followings were the main points captured from the KIIs (see Table 1 and 2 for details).• Attitude related gaps: Examples include, extensionists deprioritizing forage, livestock experts taking a reductionist approach to forage and farmers do not allocate enough land for forage production• Institutions and linkages related gaps: Examples include, forage experts do not approach scaling systematically and forage seed sources not linked with local use• Technical gaps: Examples include, skill gap in forage seed production, systematically assessing and using locally available feed and forage options, knowledge gap on forage preservation, integration of forage production and farm enterprises, climate-smart forage production, frost resistant feed and forage options, knowledge gap on seasonality of forage availability and limited capacity to plan for scare periods, price setting factors for forage seeds and fundraising and financing forage related initiatives.The negative statements in the challenges identified were then turned into a positive statements to identify the desired state. The desired states then were further analysed to identify those desired states that could be achieved by technical training intervention and those which require a non-training intervention. After thorough discussions among the research team, the following training topic were generated to address the challenges indicated by key informants. These topics were grouped under four categories (Table 3). Note that some of the topics generated from turning the desired states into training topics (Table 2) were dropped. Some of the topics were found to be better solved with non-training interventions. Other topics were found redundant and were replaced by a broader training topic category. This is an essential step in a training needs analysis (Iqbal and Khan 2011). The quantitative survey returned responses 109. Out of the total respondents, 15% were female and 85% were male. Out of the total, 25% of the respondents were age 20-30, 33% age 31-40, 31% age 41-50, and 11% age 51-60 years old (see Figure 1). The educational status indicated, 15% Diploma, 35% BSc, 28% MSc, 5% PhD, and 17% other. Other educational status, which aggregates all the education status below Diploma, i.e. high school, and also adult educations. Professionally 20% were farmers, 20% DAs, 20% Zonal/district experts, 8% regional/federal experts, 14% researcher/Lecturers, 6% private sector, 6% media, 6% non-governmental organizations (NGO) (see Figure 2). The analysis of the survey reveals that the listed training topics are agreed by 90% of the overall respondents (see Figure 3). This is not surprising given that the initial list for ranking was generated through an exploratory qualitative study. The result shows strong interest in getting evidence on the importance of livestock sector as an economic engine, making forage production climate-smart and means of securing more land for forage cultivation. There is no great difference between men and women respondents in the overall importance of the different training topics identified in the exploratory. However, the visual data presented below shows some contrasts (Figure 4). For example, one could see a lot more men than women who responded The age disaggregated data also showed a slight difference. Although it is in no way possible to claim statistical significance, the visual difference between the different age group shows that more and more older people felt indifferent about the importance of the training topics identified during the exploratory stage (Figure 5). This could be explained by the fact that the older respondents had more exposure for technical training than their younger counterparts. The disaggregation of training needs by professional category also shows a little bit of difference (Figure 6). As expected, those below a diploma status wanted most of the trainings. A little more people with BSc, MSc and PhD holders than diploma and less holders seem to rate training topics neutral or even disagree. However, note that these comparisons are not based on statistical tests. The final disaggregation was done along professional lines. This seems to be the more diverse categorization as the preferences of respondents in the different groups showed some variation (Figure 7). For example, for respondents in media, the topic on economic importance of the livestock sector scored high and technically topics such as crop residue treatment scored less. Respondents in the NGO sector disfavour the introductory sections and want more on areas of reducing the cost of production of forages.The private sector actors seemed to like more topics such as how to enhance their access to land and integrate forages in their farm enterprises and on climate proofing their forage production. They registered less interest particularly on crop residue treatment. For the researchers the topic on the economic importance of livestock were less favoured and topics in the areas of scaling and financing, climate proofing forage production and integration of forage in farm enterprises were more favoured. The farmer and extension groups have a more equivalent preference of all the topics identified in the exploratory needs assessment. Respondents were asked whether they took any training (at least one or more) related to the listed training topics within 12 months. About 41% of the respondents answered they received at least one or more refresher trainings (Figure 8). Out of these, most indicated \"Introduction to feed and forage technologies for better livestock productivity\". And the other 59% respondents didn't get any form of training related to the listed topics (Figure 8). It is important to note that topics such as finance and fund mobilization, forage planning tools, scaling approaches and costing forage production scored the lowest rating of pervious training attendance. • For media people:o What is your level of knowledge of feed and forage options and their importance for livestock production?o What are the areas of knowledge that you would need to develop good stories about feed and forage production and utilization?• For finance people:o What are the business opportunities you see in financing feed and forage production?o What are the knowledge areas you need to design a viable financial product for feed and forage production and utilization? ","tokenCount":"2544"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1703374984.json b/data/part_2/1703374984.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..de2d8ae8eb05fddafe52f1e7914c08def8925861 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1703374984.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"185e145a6e21c9a1e57675d4ecde3aea","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/a84f8348-0118-4128-b801-b6e152422be3/retrieve","id":"-2051952326"},"keywords":["Agricultural planning","Climate impacts","Climate resilience","Decadal variability","Stochastic simulation"],"sieverID":"453b7921-93ef-40d8-bb19-a1b9a5b1534d","pagecount":"48","content":"Climate prediction on decadal time scales is currently an active area of research. Although there are indications that predictions from dynamical models may have skill in some regions, assessment of this skill is still underway, and reliable model-based predictions of regional 'near-term' climate change, particularly for terrestrial regions, have not yet been demonstrated. Given the absence of such forecasts, synthetic data sequences that capture the statistical properties of observed near-term climate variability have potential value. Incorporation of a climate change component in such sequences can aid in estimating likelihoods for a range of climatic stresses, perhaps lying outside the range of past experience.Such simulations can be used to drive agricultural, hydrological or other application models, enabling resilience testing of adaptation or decision systems. The use of statistically-based methods enables the efficient generation of a large ensemble of synthetic sequences as well as the creation of well-defined probabilistic risk estimates. In this report we discuss procedures for the generation of synthetic climate sequences that incorporate both the statistics of observed variability and expectations regarding future regional climate change. Model fitting and simulation are conditioned by requirements particular to the decadal climate problem. A method for downscaling annualized simulations to the daily time step while preserving both spatial and temporal subannual statistical properties is presented and other possible methods discussed. A 'case-study' realization of the proposed framework is described.Some studies of potential decadal predictability (e.g., Boer and Lambert, 2008) suggest that skill in terrestrial regions is likely to be low. Other research (e.g., Teng and Branstator, 2010) has tended to focus on oceanic variables, perhaps based on the expectation that results are likely to be more promising than those obtained for land regions. In any event, reliable nearterm climate forecasts for terrestrial regions, particularly at local to regional scales, have not been demonstrated. Alternative methods for assessing near-term climate-related risks may thus have value.One technique that can be useful in this regard involves stochastic simulation: the creation of synthetic climate sequences having statistical properties representative of a region or locality of interest. Such sequences, while not forecasts per se, can nonetheless help to quantify ranges of uncertainty associated with near-term climate variability. Simulations may be structured so as to incorporate estimates of long-term trends associated with anthropogenically-forced climate change (including the uncertainty in these trends). The projected climate change signal then provides a slowly-changing background state on which decadal and higherfrequency fluctuations are superimposed. Together these influences provide a better description of the expected range of near-term climate variations, and their potential impacts on statistics of interest for agriculture or other applications, than either alone. It is the generation of such sequences that constitutes the focus of the present report.The discussion presented here constitutes an exploration of some of the practical considerations involved in generating such simulations. The general plan consists in decomposing regional climate variability into three components: A 'trend-like' component that may be associated with anthropogenically-induced climate change, an annual-to-decadal component, comprising variability on those time scales, and a subannual component, including the seasonal cycle and daily variability. As will be seen, this is a tidy description of what may turn out in practice to be a less-than-tidy procedure, but it can usefully serve as a template for simulation model development.The remainder of this presentation is organized as follows: In Section 2 we provide some theoretical background and describe the conceptual decomposition by time scale that underlies the proposed simulation methodology. Section 3 considers issues encountered in model design and specification. Section 4 presents a detailed framework for the construction of a simulation model, in light of the information presented in earlier sections. In Section 5 elements of a case study that illustrate one possible realization of the simulation methodology is considered. A discussion and summary follow in Sections 6 and 7, respectively.Climate variability is often parsed according to time scale, the various canonical scales corresponding approximately to different classes of climate process. There are at least two reasons for the qualifier 'approximately': First, changes in climate behaviour on different time scales may not be strictly independent: there is a possibility of cross-scale influence. Second, and particularly with regard to anthropogenic 'trends,' the separation of such trends from lowfrequency variability that may not be anthropogenic in nature is not always straightforward (Solomon et al., 2011).The above caveats notwithstanding, the simulation strategy to be discussed utilizes such a decomposition. The three time scales are treated quasi-independently, but without ignoring the possibility influence of climatic change on annual and subannual variability. The treatment of such interaction, as well as the so-called 'separation problem,' are discussed in the relevant sections of the report.On the longest time scales to be considered are the secular climate shifts referred to as 'climate change,' which play out over the course of a century or longer. These time scales involve, to first order, anthropogenic forcing of the climate through changes in the radiative properties of the Earth's atmosphere. One well-known result of this forcing is the rise in Earth's surface temperature owing to the increasing atmospheric burden of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and other greenhouse gases. Because this forcing has an incremental character (see, e.g., Figure 2.3a in Solomon et al., 2007), we identify a 'climate change' time scale, and associate slow, trend-like components in the signals analyzed with it.At the opposite end of the spectrum we find subannual variability, including the seasonal cycle and daily weather fluctuations. Because the chaotic nature of the atmosphere limits weather prediction to a time horizon of a week or two, daily variability is often simulated for application purposes using stochastic daily weather generators (Wilks and Wilby, 1999;Wilks, 1999). This strategy is analogous to what we propose here for the annual-to-decadal scale, where predictability is also likely to be limited to time horizons shorter than those for which future information is desired. A brief consideration of weather generation schemes that might be utilized in conjunction with the decadal simulations is presented in Section 4.7.2.The annual-to-decadal time scale occupies a nominal middle ground between the climate change and subannual (weather to seasonal) scales. Natural climate variability on this broad range of time scales arises from a range of processes, including the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phenomenon, large-scale decadal 'modes,' filtering of high-frequency 'weather noise' via the large thermal inertia of the oceans, volcanic eruptions and solar variability. Anthropogenic factors such as land use/land cover changes and emissions of aerosols and certain other trace gases may also produce decadal-scale climatic responses.These processes are effective to differing degrees in different ocean basins, latitude bands and regions, resulting in a rich and complex mosaic of regionally-differentiated variability on annual and longer time scales.For the purposes of simulation it is the net effect of all of these processes, as expressed in the region of interest, with which we will be concerned. To the extent that it is possible to attribute specific components of variability to particular climate processes, such information may be useful in informing the generation of stochastic sequences, (this applies as well to trend or trend-like behaviour). Conversely, to the extent that attribution is unclear, ambiguities may remain, that the simulation process will need to take into account.A modeling issue of potential importance concerns the dependence of variability at one time scale to shifts or changes on other scales. Such dependencies are often framed in terms of the effects of slow anthropogenic climate change on the more rapidly-evolving interannual or subannual scales. One example of such a dependency is the widely expected increase in interannual precipitation variability as climate warms, owing to the rapid increase in water saturation vapor pressure with temperature. Shifts in daily rainfall statistics, such as wet-and dry-spell lengths or precipitation extremes, that might come about as a consequence of global warming are another possibility.In general, the dependency of decadal variations on climatic shifts is more difficult to evaluate, since longer records are required to characterize such dependencies with a comparable degree of uncertainty. There is no simple solution to this problem, but useful information may possibly be obtained from paleorecords or climate models.Issues that arise in the course of simulation design include the availability of suitable data to which to fit the statistical model (or models) utilized, characteristics of the regional climate and the requirements of follow-on applications models. These are discussed in turn.If the simulations are to have realistic properties, sufficient data, of reasonably good quality and of sufficient temporal and spatial extent, must be available to fit the statistical model that will be used to generate them. The primary source of such data over land regions, at least prior to the advent of satellites, is weather station records, derived from measurements made in situ. This means that regions in which station measurements are sparse may present greater modeling challenges than those for which extensive, high-quality records exist.Satellite data commence only around 1979, thus are rather short for the confident characterization of decadal signals. As an example, the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), the primary large-scale mode of sea surface temperature (SST) variability in the north Atlantic, exhibits what appears to be oscillatory behaviour (Figure 1). From the satellite perspective, that is, beginning in 1979, the series has the appearance of an upward trend, with little suggestion of this behaviour.Given the limited length of many observational records, one can imagine a role for paleoclimate data, which may extend hundreds of years or more into the past. Tree-ring reconstructions were used e.g. by Prairie et al. (2008), for stochastic simulations of Colorado River streamflow. The paleorecord in that case shows evidence of 'megadroughts' -dry epochs whose lengths greatly exceed those in the historical record. Beyond the obvious requirement that suitable paleorecords, applicable to the region under study, must be available, the introduction of such data raises calibration and other technical issues. If these can be resolved in a satisfactory manner, appropriate paleodata may prove of value in the characterization of decadal variability. (Tree-ring evidence was considered for the case study discussed in Section 5, but coverage in that case was deemed insufficient).Training data for the statistical model should be representative of the locality or region for which simulations are to be generated. However, these data also serve to characterize regional low-frequency variability. If the 'region' under consideration is too small, any low-frequency component that is present may be masked by the relatively larger local variability in the record. Decadal-scale processes tend to have relatively large-scale footprints. Modeled regions should be of sufficient spatial extent to capture such fluctuations, while also remaining representative of the study area for which simulations are to be generated.If the region of interest is climatically coherent it may be reasonable to model its spatially averaged variables directly. (This procedure is followed in the case study). However, if sufficiently extended it may be preferable to prefilter the data in terms of empirical orthogonal functions (EOFs), modeling instead a subset of the expansion coefficient time series. This would permit the statistical model to capture behaviour having more complex spatial signatures while also increasing the signal-to-noise ratio in the modeled data. In the more detailed discussions that follow we offer a conceptual description of such a strategy.We review here the three time scales referenced in Section 2, from a general modeling-based perspective.Trends represent nonstationarity in the mean: a local average, changing with time, around which decadal and higher-frequency signals fluctuate. Even if the character of these fluctuations changes little, a persistent trend will eventually bring about the occurrence of climate anomalies lying outside the range of the observational past. An agriculturallysignificant maximum temperature threshold may be crossed more and more often as climate warms, for example or a critical number of consecutive frost days may be exceeded less and less frequently. The inclusion of trends in simulated sequences is thus essential from the estimation-of-risk perspective.Observed trends may tell us something about regional sensitivity to anthropogenic forcing, particularly with regard to temperature. However the warming observed during the 20 th century has not been large compared with that expected for the future. In addition, certain anthropogenic inputs, such as aerosol or ozone forcing, may change in the future in ways that are not reflected in the 20 th century record. For these reasons it may be useful to also consider what climate models may have to tell us regarding future temperature and precipitation trends.A possible third source of information is the body of theoretical work that has developed in regard to future climate expectations. The expectation that global warming will bring about a poleward shift of the dry subtropical zones and mid-latitude storm tracks, for example, preconditions the discussion and may tilt the balance in favour of accepting, or at least entertaining, a projection that is consistent with such an outcome.We model annual-to-decadal variability as a combination of what can loosely be termed 'systematic ' and 'random' variations. In practice this means that we adopt, as a random climatic background, the first-order autoregressive, or AR(1) process. Because the model may comprise more than a single variable this background may be multivariate. Signal components that demonstrably do not conform to the AR(1) model are then defined as 'systematic.'Given the wide range of random process types from which one might choose, there would appear to be a degree of arbitrariness in the way this distinction is drawn. The AR(1) structure seems appropriate, however, because it is the simplest such process having 'memory,' and because it requires few assumptions about underlying physical mechanisms. As noted earlier, the AR(1) response can arise simply as a result of random high-frequency 'weather noise,'forcing a sluggish, high-inertia ocean, this in fact being the paradigm for the generation of low-frequency stochastic variability in middle and high latitudes. It is not accidental that AR(1) noise is often taken as the classical 'null hypothesis' for oceanic variability in these regions (Deser et al., 2010).In some situations climatic variations may follow 'regime-like' behaviour. Such behaviour is characterized by states having residence times that are long, compared with the time required for state-to-state transitions. Such behaviour might occur on the subannual scale, for example, in connection with transitions among a set of 'weather states,' or regimes, and state-based models have been utilized to good effect for the purposes of downscaling (e.g., Greene et al., 2008Greene et al., , 2011)). However, it may be difficult to distinguish between 'regime-like' and 'wavelike' systems: there is not a sharp demarcation, but rather an infinite range of gradations between the two types of behaviour (Rudnick and Davis, 2003;Overland et al., 2006).Ultimately, if it is decided that the system to be modeled is in fact regime-like on the annualto-decadal scale, a state-based model may prove more appropriate than one based on the systematic/random dichotomy described above. This sort of model is exemplified in the streamflow simulations of Prairie et al. (2008).Aside from the low-order physical justification, use of the AR(1) process clarifies the modeling framework, by providing a baseline statistical structure with which climate records that are candidates for simulation may be compared. Rejection of the AR(1) null hypothesis is then taken as evidence for the existence of a 'systematic' signal. Such a signal would require either a reconsideration of the basic structure of the data, or possibly an independent submodel, in the same way that seasonality requires its own submodel when analyzing data containing seasonal effects: The seasonal cycle is not AR(1). A modeling framework consistent with the systematic/random paradigm, wavelet autoregressive modeling (WARM) is described by Kwon et al. (2007Kwon et al. ( , 2009)).Seasonality is a significant factor in many, if not most, regions. In the simulation context it may useful to model only the rainy season, since this is likely also the growing season and outside this window little significant precipitation may occur. A variety of daily weather statistics, including distribution shape, extremes and spell lengths, for both temperature and precipitation, may be at issue, and the daily component of a complete simulation scheme should attempt to account for these.Since the simulation context is malleable and dependent on setting, it may prove desirable in some cases to produce simulations that are not daily-resolved. Agricultural models typically do require daily values of climate parameters, but there may already be an extant daily simulator (weather generator), for example, tuned to the localities of interest and designed to accept monthly mean values as inputs. In such a situation the simulation model can be modified so as to generate monthly sequences, for subsequent use in driving the weather generator.Ultimately, it is the application model that determines whether simulations need extend to the daily time step, and which data are to be simulated. If required variables have not been recorded, empirical rules, perhaps based on data from similar sites, may have to be devised in order to obtain values. An example would be the creation of two insolation distributions, for wet and dry days, in the case that adequate primary data are not available. Insolation would then be simulated by sampling from these distributions conditional on the occurrence of rain, as generated by the core simulation model.In some cases, such as the Colorado River streamflow mentioned earlier, univariate simulations are sufficient: A single variable encodes sufficient information for inference concerning relevant 'downstream' impacts. In others, such as the case study to be described, multivariate simulations are required; intervariable correlation on annual and longer time scales then becomes an important simulation target. Follow-on models will also play a role in determining simulation statistics of interest, and thus the generation of simulation ensembles.As with many statistical models, the machinery of simulation provides many 'knobs' that the experimenter can turn at will, generating in the process a potentially wide range of outcomes.We believe that it is most sensible, given such a choice, to focus on climatic shifts that external evidence informs us are likely to occur, or whose occurrence are supported by theoretical arguments. Otherwise the risk exists of generating scenarios that have little probability of actually coming to pass. In effect this is simply a recommendation for the principle of parsimony.Model development is keyed to the decomposition by time scale (or more or less equivalently, process class) discussed in Sec. 2, as conditioned by the contingencies discussed in Section 3.These include the availability of observational training data, requirements of agricultural or other follow-on models and the characteristics of regional climate variability. We note here the ways in which these contingencies affect the development of a suitable model.Model requirements may be expected to differ from setting to setting, and design must adjust accordingly. What is common is the separate treatment of trend, annual-to-decadal and subannual variability (considering possible cross-scale interactions), the introduction of climate information beyond that embodied solely in the datasets employed, and the use of an AR (1) model as random background on the annual-to-decadal time scale, against which systematic variations play out.First, we require a detrending procedure, to remove the estimated forced response from the observational data on which the decadal component of the simulation model is to be trained.Second, in the simulation step we require an estimate of how mean process levels will evolve in the future. Past and future trends need not be the same.There are many options available for fitting both linear and nonlinear trends to time series, the simplest perhaps being the straight line fit. Such a line can be extrapolated, providing a trend for the future. However, past and future trends may differ, rendering such an approach questionable. The use of nonlinear trends, using exponential or other parametric forms, does not address this problem. Further, trends computed as a function of time alone have no physical underpinning, being essentially numerical in nature.We propose instead to parameterize trend in terms of regional climate response to global The planet is not expected to warm uniformly; modeling local trends as dependent on the global mean temperature takes such spatial variation into account.For local temperature we model both past and future trends based on the assumption that it is the spatial pattern of temperature dependence, rather than the local rate of warming that is stationary. Thus, regional or local temperature trends are regressed on a global mean temperature signal, according towhere ! ! is the regional or local temperature record, ! ! is a multimodel-mean, global mean temperature signal, ! ! is an intercept term and ! ! represents the regional response to global temperature change. The fitted values ! ! are used to detrend the observed temperature record, while the ! ! and ! ! are used to project local temperature forward, based on the future global mean temperature signal. The multimodel mean global mean signal used as regressand is derived from an ensemble of GCMs participating in a recent IPCC Assessment Report.The assumption of a consistent relationship between both past and future local temperatures and the global mean temperature can be verified in the GCM domain. If the climate models do not confirm such consistency the modeler will have to consider the available information and make a reasoned choice about how to proceed. In the case study, temperature, but not precipitation trends were found to behave consistently across centuries. The manner in which(1)this inconsistency was resolved is illustrative, but not comprehensive, since many types of behaviour may be possible.The global temperature signal used as regressand is shown in Figure 2. To obtain this series the global mean temperature records for the 20 th and 21 st centuries from an ensemble of 14GCMs from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) were first concatenated into records spanning the years 1901-2095. Each GCM's record was then smoothed, using a Butterworth filter (Smith, 2003) of order five, having a half-power point, or 'cutoff,' at a period of 10 yr. (Results are not sensitive to the particular method of filtering.) The plot shows the average of the 14 smoothed series thus obtained.Internal variability is intrinsic to each of the GCMs but is largely incoherent among them.Averaging thus acts to suppress this variability, while enhancing that part of the signal that the GCMs have in common -that of climate change. Thus, model averaging enhances the climate change signal while attenuating 'internal variability noise.' The filtering further smooths this signal, suppressing residual high-frequency variability and short-lived transients such as the effects of volcanic eruptions (although the latter are still discernible in Figure 2, and may be reflected to a modest degree in inferred 20 th century trends). Volcanoes are treated here as unpredictable external forcing, unrelated to climate; no attempt is made to simulate their future effects. The simulations thus produced may be considered as representing a volcano-free perspective on the next few decades.When a local or regional signal is regressed on the series of Figure 2, the fitted values, now representing the local or regional climate change trend, appear as a scaled and shifted version of that series. This process and its result are shown in Figure 3, where we have taken as an example the AMO signal described earlier. The original signal is shown in panel (a), along with the fitted trend, which appears as a scaled and shifted version of the curve shown in Figure 2. Note that this trend, although linearly dependent on the global mean temperature signal, is not linear in time. In particular, because the globe has warmed (in GCMs, but also in reality) more rapidly toward the end of the century, the trend accelerates during this period.The effect is that a greater portion of the AMO signal is assigned to anthropogenic causes than would be the case if the AMO were linearly detrended. The response of precipitation to changes in global mean temperature has an important indirect component, in that it depends not just on shifts in temperature but also, and possibly in a significant way, on changes in atmospheric circulation. Thus, projecting forward the results of a 20 th century regression is a less certain enterprise than is the case with temperature.Additional evidence, in the form of GCM simulations, attribution studies or detailed model experiments may be helpful in informing the modeler's judgment in this case. Shin et al. (2010) present an attribution study along these lines. Ultimately it may be prudent to provide explicit uncertainty bounds when projecting precipitation trends. The objective now is to fit a statistical model to time series that correspond to what is shown in Figure 3b for the AMO-detrended sequences, comprising a possibly wide spectrum of variability on periods of one year and longer. If the data is determined to be regime-like, a hidden Markov model or some elaboration thereof might be considered (e.g., Norris, 1997).Such models are based on the idea that the underlying process is governed by transitions between well-defined 'hidden states,' that can be inferred via the observations. The strategy followed here is not state-based, but follows instead the systematic/random signal decomposition described in Section 3.2.2, by testing the candidate series against a red-noise null hypothesis.Wavelet analysis (see, e.g., Mallat, 1999) provides a way of examining variability in both the time and frequency domains simultaneously. The wavelet decomposition, or spectrum, as applied to a time series, is represented by a two-dimensional plot showing time along the xaxis and period (as in the period of an oscillation) on the y-axis. Examination of the spectrum reveals intervals when the signal variance is high in particular frequency bands, while a timeaveraged summary, the 'global' wavelet spectrum indicates whether frequency-specific behaviour differs significantly from AR(1) noise, the criterion we utilize for differentiating systematic from random variability. An example will illustrate the principle.Figure 4 shows a wavelet decomposition of the NINO3 SST index (Trenberth, 1976), with Figures 4a, 4b and 4c showing the NINO3 time series, the wavelet spectrum and the global wavelet spectrum, respectively. In the last of these three plots, the dotted line indicates the 10% red noise significance level. Spectral power exceeds this level in the ENSO band, corresponding to periods of roughly 2-8 years, meaning that the probability is less than 10% that ENSO-band signal variance represents the expression of an AR(1) process. Simulations generated by a red-noise model would not be likely to exhibit such a spectral peak. By our definition, a systematic component has been detected in the data.Figure 4 also shows that activity in the ENSO band has not been constant over time, with a period of relative quiescence between about 1920 and 1960. Assuming that systematic NINO3 variability can be modeled with a higher-order stochastic model of some sort, the modeler is now faced with a question: On which period should the NINO3 model be trained?Such a model might be based on the 'active' periods in the record, resulting in a relatively vigorous simulated ENSO. Alternatively, the 'quiet' period could be modeled, resulting in simulations having relatively weak ENSO variability. A second-order model might also be utilized, in which ENSO activity is amplitude-modulated on multidecadal time scales. In the latter case a decision would be required regarding the modeling of transitions between strong and weak ENSO phases: Should a regime-like model be used, or one in which transitions are more gradual? More generally, does the data permit differentiating between these alternatives? Because future climate behaviour is at issue, a role is suggested for GCM-based information that might help inform the modeler's decision. GCMs exhibiting realistic ENSO variability tell us only that anthropogenic influence on ENSO in the coming century is likely to be weak (Coelho and Goddard, 2009); the best alternative might thus be to include both strong and weak variability, in a model in which transition characteristics are to be determined.An objective method for decomposing signals using wavelets, identifying components that differ significantly from a red noise background, modeling those components individually as low-order autoregressive processes and combining results in order to generate simulations is known as wavelet autoregressive modeling (WARM) (Kwon et al., 2007(Kwon et al., , 2009)). Such a method is inherently consistent with our systematic/random decomposition. Kwon et al.discuss only univariate series, but extension to the multivariate case should not pose a significant obstacle to implementation. Thus, the combination of WARM with the other elements described herein could constitute a complete 'toolkit' for the generation of stochastic decadal simulations.Another option, also utilizing a sophisticated red-noise significance test, is Monte Carlo singular spectrum analysis (MCSSA) (Allen and Smith, 1996). The resulting spectral decomposition also resolves the target signal into systematic and random (red noise) components; the former can be projected forward using a technique called linear predictive coding (Press et al., 1986(Press et al., -1992)), while the multichannel variant of SSA (MSSA) offers an extension to the multivariate case. These methods are perhaps more appropriate when it is believed that the systematic component is at least quasi-periodic.As suggested in Section 4.3.1, a systematic component such as that represented by the 2-8year band in the NINO3 series might possibly be represented by a stochastic model of higher order than AR(1). Kwon et al. claim that the WARM decomposition performed better than a single model fit to those time series with which they have experimented, but for a given series this is a testable hypothesis, and in some cases a single model might provide a parsimonious alternative to WARM, in which every frequency component exceeding the global significance level is effectively assigned its own model.Since the source of much low-frequency variability is believed to reside in the oceans, predictability studies have tended to focus on oceanic variables, typically SST or upper ocean heat content (Knight et al., 2005;Newman, 2007;Teng and Branstator, 2010). Although such studies may be informative, for the purpose of simulating terrestrial variations it is ultimately necessary to deconstruct and model them directly. A consideration of the efficacy with which Evidently, systematic behaviour can assume many forms, this being one reason that a definitive formula for decadal simulation is difficult to specify a priori. If, however, as suggested by WARM modeling, most systematic elements can be represented, for the purposes of simulation, as the sum of low-order autoregressive components, the minimallysufficient model class would be limited to a reasonably small set. Application in a variety of simulation settings will help to delimit this class. We note in passing that the reports of Kwon et al. focused on the simulation of nonlinear elements, without specifically addressing regimelike behaviour.By construction, that part of the target signal not identified as systematic does not differ significantly from AR(1) noise. An AR(1) model is thus taken here as a basis for the random simulation component. Since this process has memory, it can generate 'slow' fluctuations, including potentially long spells above or below the mean (if the autoregressive parameter is large enough). However, although such processes may meander up and down, they are not periodic: The AR(1) spectrum has no peaks.Because agricultural or other applications models typically require multivariate input, we consider a natural generalization of the AR(1) model, the first-order vector autoregressive, or VAR(1) model:where ! ! is the process vector at time t, ! is a matrix of coefficients and ! ! is a stationary white noise process with expectation ! and covariance matrix = ! ! ! ! .Note that this is completely analogous to the univariate AR(1) model, the difference being that scalars have been replaced with vectors (or in the case of !, by a matrix). The process represented by (2)represents not only serial autocorrelation but also first-order lag correlations across variables.Nonparametric resampling techniques such as the k-nearest-neighbor (k-NN) method (Lall and Sharma, 1996;Rajagopalan and Lall, 1999) offer a possible alternative to (parametric) stochastic models for the annual-to-decadal component. The k-NN method can in theory account for serial correlation in the data, and because it 'blindly' mimics the target series without parametric constraints it is capable of generating simulations with distributional properties that might be difficult to reproduce with parametric methods. Using such a scheme it might even be possible to dispense with the disaggregation into systematic and random components, regenerating the statistics of the complete annual-to-decadal signal via resampling alone. Depending on the complexity of the target series, the method may require a large training set for reasonably precise replication of desired statistical properties.Experimenting with such methods may prove worthwhile, however.In generating the simulated sequences the decomposition process is reversed: The trend and annual-to-decadal components are simulated individually and the results then combined. In Section 3.1.3 we mentioned two possibilities: Treatment of the primary climate variables averaged over the simulation domain and prefiltering in terms of EOFs. Details will depend on which of these alternatives is adopted.If domain-averaged variables are utilized there will exist both a trend model and a stochastic simulation model for the annual-to-decadal component, both applicable to the domain as a whole, Both the projected trends and the simulated variability will presumably be multivariate; they are combined variable by variable, resulting in a regional-scale simulation that is temporally complete down to the annual level. This simulation will then be propagated to locations within the domain, effecting a spatial downscaling on the annual-to-decadal level.Prefiltering in terms of EOFs implies a domain of sufficient extent so that climate variability is better described in terms of patterns, as opposed to simple regional averages. Subject to experiment, detrending may be performed either at the local level prior to computing EOFs or on those of the principal component (PC) time series having significant trends. In either situation the relevant signals are regressed on the global mean temperature record, as with regionally-averaged variables. Operating on the PCs implies a stationarity assumption on intervariable trend covariance, establishing an internal control on future projections, but also may be viewed as entangling temperature and precipitation trends, thus enforcing a relationship that may or may not be appropriate for the future.As in the case of regionally-averaged variables, there will exist a model, or models, for annual-to-decadal variations, now applicable not to the regional climate variables but to thosePCs that have been retained as being statistically significant. Systematic, then random components would then be simulated and combined as before, again resulting in a simulation that is temporally complete down to the annual scale. However, the simulations in this case would already be spatially disaggregated down to the local scale (i.e., the spatial scale of the data on which the EOFs are computed).The resultant of the 'reaggregation' procedure described in Section 4.6 is a simulation resolved at the annual level. If domain-averaged climate variables have been utilized the simulation will apply to the region as a whole; if prefiltering by EOFs, the simulation will be expressed at individual locations, being already downscaled at the annual time step. In the latter case it is presumed that only a small number of EOFs/PCs are retained, according to some test of statistical significance (typically a 'stopping rule' in the case of PC analysis).Variance at individual locations will then have to be increased if it is to match that of the local signal being simulated. Since the 'discarded' PCs are assumed to represent noise, the missing variance can be consistently supplied by adding uncorrelated noise at each location.In the case that domain-averaged climate variables are modeled there will be a single (multivariate) simulation for the entire domain. This may be propagated to individual locations via linear regression, again adding uncorrelated noise to bring simulation variance into agreement with what is observed at the location.For either of the above strategies the result at this stage will be a fully spatially resolved simulation that incorporates both expected climatic trends and variability down to the annual level. Assuming that daily values will be required in the final simulation product, what remains is to disaggregate the annually-resolved signal to the daily time step. In doing so several data characteristics must be respected: First, the annual values generated by the simulation procedure up to this point must be reproduced. Second, spatial covariability at the daily level must be preserved. Note that this is in addition to the spatial coherence imposed at the annual-to-decadal level. Third, to the extent possible, future behaviour with respect to significant characteristics of daily variability, such as spell lengths and extremes, should be anticipated.Use of a nonparametric scheme, with specific reference to k-NN, was mentioned as a means of simulating annual-to-decadal variability. Use of such a method is also feasible for the simulation of daily variability. Spatial coherence may be preserved by resampling the entire domain at once. However, literal resampling of the observational data will result in discrepancies in annual values, since the available set of observational records is finite and will not in general comprise exact matches with the imposed simulation values. An additional shortcoming arises in the case where climate change measurably shifts the range of simulated values with respect to the range of the observational data. In this case there may not exist, in the observational record, values that are representative of the simulation. Resampled observations may be rescaled to match the imposed simulation, but this may have the undesirable effect of distorting daily distributions (of precipitation, for example). Moreover, rescaling does not account for potential changes in spell lengths. In spite of these shortcomings resampling methods may be acceptable in some circumstances. A k-NN scheme is utilized in the case study.Stochastic weather models offer an alternative means of generating daily weather sequences that are consistent with stochastic decadal simulations of interannual variability. The input parameters of a stochastic weather generator can be manipulated to reproduce synthetic weather having the statistical properties of interest. This approach is often used to provide daily weather inputs for agricultural or hydrological models for climate change impact studies, based on GCM or RCM simulations of future climate.Changing individual parameters can have unintended consequences on the statistical properties of simulated weather sequences because of the dependencies in time and among meteorological variables. For a class of relatively simple, parametric stochastic weather models, work by Wilks (1992); Katz (1996) and Mearns et al. (1997) are illustrative, and provide useful guidance on how to adjust parameters to approximate (with sufficient replication) target statistics.Adapting this approach to stochastic decadal simulations would be more complex than adjusting parameters to capture the statistics of a future climate: First, to capture trends and multi-decadal variability, the parameters would need to be adjusted for every year of each realization of the stochastic decadal simulation. Second, because stochastic weather models have their own interannual variability (although most tend to under-represent it),superimposing generated daily weather sequences on stochastic decadal simulations without correction would inflate the variability (in time and among realizations) of annual statistics and the uncertainty of the modeled agricultural impact.A more promising approach is to constrain the generated daily sequences to match target monthly or seasonal values. Generated temperature data can be rescaled to match a target mean through a simple additive shift. To avoid unrealistic combinations of rainfall frequency and intensity, rainfall can be constrained to a target value by iteratively sampling and testing generated sequences for a target period (e.g., month or season) until the total is acceptably close to a target value, then rescaling to exactly match the target (Hansen and Indeje, 2004;Kittel et al., 2004;Hansen and Ines, 2005). Advantages of this approach are: (a) it is easier to implement since it does not require complex parameter adjustments or a large number of replicates each year, (b) it would not inflate the variability of the stochastic decadal simulations, and (c) variation in rainfall frequency and mean intensity would be more realistic. Hansen and Ines (2005) describe an implementation built on the stochastic weather generator distributed with the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) crop modeling suite (Jones et al., 2003).Although the simulation model can be fit to annual mean values, this is not necessarily optimal. The rainy season, for example, may cross the calendar boundary from one year to the next, so it might be more sensible to define a hydrological year that differs from the calendar year. Modeling annual values for a specified season less than 12 months in length may also constitute a useful strategy, perhaps utilizing climatology for the portion of the year not simulated explicitly. In general, simulation design will be constrained by follow-on modeling requirements.We have assumed that simulations will be downscaled to daily time resolution, but this may not always be required. Some hydrological applications, such as reservoir management, may function adequately using monthly values. The strategies outlined above should be amenable to generating monthly outputs, if these are desired.A resampling method, used for downscaling to the daily level, may implicitly encode some dependence between climate change (i.e., trend) and subannual scales, via the selection of 'neighbors' from which the resampled statistics are ultimately drawn. Weather generators may include such linkages explicitly. However we have not described a mechanism for linking changes in climate to variability on the annual-to-decadal scale. An example of such a link would be an increase in interannual precipitation variance as global temperature increases. Such dependencies can be investigated with the aid of GCMs and, if deemed significant, incorporated explicitly in the simulation model.The end result of the above steps is a set of daily-resolved simulations that are spatially resolved at the station or gridbox level (depending on the nature of the training data). These simulations will include trends that may vary over the domain and that have been informed by observational data and/or GCM simulations of future climate, and possibly theoretical expectations regarding future climatic tendencies. Variability on both the annual-to-decadal and daily time scales, including spatial coherence over the domain, should approximate that represented by the observations, again as informed by information from GCMs and theory (insofar as the modeler has chosen to incorporate particular inferences in the simulation code).It will evidently be worthwhile for the modeler to validate the simulations, to verify that statistical properties are as expected. This can be accomplished through the usual statistical comparisons, in particular using simulations of the observational period. Assessments of simulation-model adequacy must take into account the degree to which any deficiencies identified are actually material with respect to eventual application.Finally, sequences can be generated that explore a range of plausible climatic futures for the region of interest. Since all of the variability is model-generated it becomes possible to quantify the likelihood of particular outcomes, either by direct computation or by the analysis of simulations, in the case that the model incorporates nonparametric elements. When translated, for example, into crop yields, through the agency of an agricultural model, resultsshould prove useful for purposes of planning or adaptation. This is the motivation for the methodology described in this report.Water Management Areas, Western Cape, South AfricaThe ideas and methods presented herein represent an attempt to generalize some lessons learned from both the implementation described in Greene et al. (2012) and ongoing work in implementing the method in other regions, including southeastern South America and parts of monsoonal Asia. We abstract here certain elements of the first of these implementations, to show how the framework described in the foregoing sections might be realized in a specific regional setting and application-model context. The treatment here is abbreviated; the reader is referred to Greene et al. (2012) for additional information. The code used to generate the subject simulations, along with a user guide, is available for download. See Acknowledgments for details.The study region (Figure 5), located in the Western Cape province of South Africa, comprises the Berg Water Management Area (WMA) and parts of the Breede WMA and covers ~19000 km 2 . The Berg and Breede rivers drain into the Atlantic and Indian oceans, respectively, but there are interbasin transfers between them, and the two WMAs are managed as an integrated system.In addition to economically significant agriculture, the WMAs provide water for industrial use and constitute the principal source of supply for the city of Cape Town (Figure 5). Urban water demand has steadily increased over the last three decades, tripling since the late 1970s, while there is a moderately strong consensus among the IPCC models (see, e.g., Ch. 11 in Solomon et al., 2007) that the region will dry in coming decades, with rising global temperatures. The combination of economic importance (in large part attributable to the production of high-value crops), rising urban demand and potentially decreasing supply has motivated intensive study and modeling of the region's water resources. Greene et al. (2012) constitutes a part of this effort.An agrohydrology model developed at the University of KwaZulu-Natal (Pietermaritzburg, South Africa), denoted ACRU (Schulze, 1995;Smithers and Schulze, 2004) has been used to model the WMAs. The simulations to be described were designed to drive this model, considerations ranging the use of input data keyed to subcatchments within the WMAs and the simulation of a minimally required suite of input variables, to the detailed file formatting requirements of ACRU. As its designation suggests, ACRU represents not only basic hydrological responses such as runoff and soil moisture, but also includes some crop modeling capabilities. Further along in the chain, a general equilibrium economic model, developed at the UNEP Risø Centre on Energy, Climate and Sustainable Development (Roskilde, Denmark), is being used to assess potential economic impacts of the modeled climate fluctuations. It is worth noting that the existence of a comprehensive follow-on modeling framework is synergistic with the production of simulated climate sequences: It energizes and guides the generation of the simulations while also benefiting from them, in the context of an integrated approach to impact assessment.The WMAs have been mapped into 171 quinary-level catchments, for which a daily dataset spanning the years 1950-1999, including precipitation and maximum and minimum daily temperatures (pr, Tmax, Tmin), was available. These three variables represent the minimal set required for driving ACRU. The annual-to-decadal simulation model is based on a multivariate 'regional' signal consisting of the catchment-averaged variables, reduced to annual time resolution (Figure 6). Trend lines shown in the figure are based not on time, but on the regional response to global mean temperature change, as discussed in Section 4.2. It can be seen that upward tendencies for both Tmax and Tmin begin around 1970; the global signal also exhibits this behaviour, and provides a better fit to data than does a linear trend. (In the case of precipitation the trend is essentially null, and the shape of the regressand makes little difference).Simulations of temperature and precipitation for both the 20 th and 21 st centuries (the 'historical' and 'RCP4.5' experiments, respectively) were obtained from the most recent archive of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). These were utilized, at the regional scale, for inference regarding past and future trends. In addition, temperature was utilized at the global scale for detrending and projection, as described in Section 4.2.Use of catchment-averaged variables represents the approach whereby the entire region is modeled as a unit, rather than that in which the spatially-differentiated data is prefiltered in terms of EOFs. We believe the regionally-averaged approach is justified here because the study area -the combined WMAs -behaves coherently on the annual-to-decadal level. In propagating both trend and annual-to-decadal fluctuations to the catchment level, mechanisms are included that permit a degree of intercatchment dispersion, mimicking that in the observational record. To detrend the regional series, each component was regressed on the global temperature signal shown in Figure 2. The fitted values are overplotted on the regional series in Figure 6.The fitted trends are subtracted from the series to obtain the residual 'natural' component of variability. Like the regional series, this natural residual, which becomes the target for the annual-to-decadal simulation model, has annual time resolution.The wavelet spectrum of each of the three detrended variables (pr, Tmin, Tmax) was computed; these spectra gave no indication that the component series differed from red noise.In other words, systematic variability, as previously defined, was not detected in the regional record. Because of this, a modeling step accounting for such variability would have been superfluous. A significant degree of serial autocorrelation was identified in both of the temperature series; the red-noise model is thus not only sufficient for representing the statistics of these series, but also necessary. The regional precipitation signal was indistinguishable from white noise. The absence of a systematic element in the target records, by removing a degree of 'modeling freedom,' renders the method perhaps less interesting than might have been the case in other regions. A survey of annual and seasonal precipitation around the globe (not shown) suggests, however, that regions where significant deviations from a red noise (or, in the case of precipitation, even white noise) background occur tend to be the exception, rather than the rule. Reduction of the annual-to-decadal model to a VAR(1) structure may thus represent a widely applicable situation.A schematic of the case study simulation is provided as Figure 7. This is a simplified picture, in which some of the symbols have multiple levels of meaning. For example, the method of projection differs for temperature and precipitation trends, but only a single path is shown.Details are elucidated in the text, and in Greene et al. (2012).A first-order VAR model was thus fit to the detrended regional series. A single, very long simulation (500 ky) was then generated, using the inferred parameter values. This is equivalent to an ensemble of 10000 50-year simulations, many more than would be required for driving ACRU. However the abundance of simulation data is useful in that it provides a large 'library' from which shorter sequences having desired statistical properties can be extracted. Statistics computed on the simulated sequence indicate that it reproduces well the observed intervariable correlations as well as serial autocorrelation (thus persistence, or lowfrequency variability in the AR(1) sense) in the individual variables.For purposes of illustration we focus on deviations from the long-term trend of 10-year mean precipitation, modeling the 5 th and 95 th percentiles (for 10-year means). The simulated 10-year mean deviations are situated in the 2041-2050 decade; by this time the projected median trend results in a reduction in regional mean annual precipitation of about 10%.The very long simulation sequence permits fairly precise screening, enabling the identification of 10-year sequences for which the mean precipitation falls very near the specified percentiles, while corresponding means of Tmin and Tmax lie reasonably close (plus or minus about half a standard deviation) to their conditional means, given the specified value of pr. This second condition is imposed so that hydrology driven by the simulations will not be accidentally biased by atypical, if nevertheless possible, temperature values. In addition it was required that the 10-year mean pr anomaly during the preceding decade (i.e., 2031-2040) not be large, so as to avoid accidental bias owing to hydrologic memory.Analysis of the CMIP5 ensemble indicated that for temperature, 20 th and 21 st century regional trends behaved consistently with respect to the global mean trend, while precipitation trends diverged, the 20 th century trend being essentially null while the 21 st century trend was significantly negative. Because of this divergence the two variables were treated differently with respect to future trends.For the temperature components (Tmax, Tmin), each catchment's record was regressed on the 20 th century global-mean multimodel-mean temperature (Figure 2); the derived coefficients were then used, in conjunction with the 21 st century global mean temperature, to project temperature trends forward, enforcing consistent behaviour across centuries. For precipitation the 21 st century trend was computed using the GCM ensemble without reference to the observations. There is significant dispersion among the model trends, the multimodel ensemble mean and standard deviation amounting to -6.7% and 6.6% change in regional precipitation per degree global warming, respectively. Of the 14 models in the ensemble, three exhibit wetting tendencies for the Western Cape region, suggesting a distinct, if relatively small, probability of such an outcome. It is worth noting that a drying trend is consistent with theoretical expectations regarding expansion of the dry subtropics with global warming, with a particularly robust response occurring toward the poleward margins of the subtropical dry zones. Southwestern South Africa lies in just such a zone (See Figure 11.2 in Solomon et al., 2007). The temporal pattern of drying expressed by the model ensemble seems consistent with the poleward advance of a dry subtropical regime that reaches, and eventually overrides, the region of the Western Cape. Owing to the dispersion in ensemble precipitation response, it is left to the modeler to select a quantile for simulation from the multimodel distribution. This choice is made at runtime, as the simulations are generated.Modeling of the trend and annual-to-decadal components, as described above, produces an intermediate simulation product, applicable to the regional as a whole and resolved on the annual time step. Downscaling involves the propagation of these sequences to the individual catchments, as well as the generation of subannual variability:1. Subannual values are generated by resampling the observations in one-year blocks over the entire domain, then scaling observed values to agree, in the regional annual mean, with those of the imposed simulation, including both trend and annual-to-decadal variations. As a preliminary to this procedure the sequence of observed years corresponding to the simulated sequence is selected using a modified k-NN scheme.2. Temperature trends are propagated to the catchment level as described above, through linear regression on the 20 th century global mean, then projection using the 21 st century global mean. Because modeled regional values represent catchment averages the average of future catchment trends will approximate the imposed regional trend.3. The regional precipitation trend, as selected by the modeler, is imposed, but it would be unrealistic to simulate identical trends at all catchments. Thus the 20 th century precipitation trends are used to induce some scatter around the imposed trend value.Again, the average over catchments produces an overall trend closely approximating the imposed value (since the average 20 th century trend is near zero).4. Separately, imposed annual-to-decadal variations are propagated to the catchments via linear regression, uncorrelated noise (at the annual level) being added in order to replace variance lost to regression. 5. To generate subannual variability, resampled values at each catchment are rescaled -in one-year blocks -so as to match the simulated trend plus annual-to-decadal variations, as propagated to the catchment level. In effect subannual patterns of variability are preserved, but annual-mean amounts are substituted for the intrinsic observational mean values. Because the resampling is performed over the domain as a whole, spatial coherence is preserved at subannual scales.On the annual-to-decadal scale, both intervariable correlation and serial autocorrelation in individual variables were found to be quite well-simulated, justifying ex post facto the use of the VAR(1) model.Comparison of simulations for 1950-1999 with the observational record indicated that the k-NN scheme captured well the observed dependencies of daily precipitation statistics on annual mean precipitation, both for the study area as a whole and with respect to individual catchments. Statistics examined were wet-and dry-spell counts and lengths, wet-spell mean Figure 8 shows that both decadal and anthropogenic signals play out against a background of strong year-to-year variability. Planning for climatic stresses on interannual time scales thus remains an important consideration in the overall risk assessment profile.The methodologies we have discussed above comprise at least two levels of generality: The simulation framework itself is broadly sketched out, while realization at the level of the case study is considerably more particularized. Starting from a broad-brush outline, then, simulation details must be elaborated according to the available evidence and particularities of the setting under consideration. Evidence to be considered includes the observational record, information from GCMs, theoretical expectations and possibly paleorecords, if the latter are available. These sources must be weighed with respect to both content and reliability and a coherent narrative woven from the various evidentiary threads that they present. Constructing this narrative may not be a simple task.The simulation methodology described, like many statistical models, is computationally inexpensive compared with both global and regional dynamical models. It is also informed, as we have discussed, by a multiplicity of sources. It is both a strength and a weakness that the modeler can combine these sources according to their perceived degrees of reliability, arriving at a final structure that reflects a differential, and perhaps personal, view of climate information. Of course the metrics involved in information assessment are at least semiobjective, and every statistical model begins with some intuitive, if initially inchoate, sense of the relationships between covariates and predictand. In the end, the advantages of such models must be weighed against their inability to anticipate shifts or changes owing to processes or interactions that have not been accounted for in some way. This justifies reliance on a broad informational background during model design.An illustration of such reliance can be provided for the case of temporal precipitation variability. As a result of anthropogenic warming it is widely believed that this variability will increase, owing to the rapid increase of water saturation vapor pressure with temperature: A warmer atmosphere can transport more water vapor. Because of this it can rain more but also become drier, since atmospheric demand can also increase. There is no mechanism in the statistical model we have described that would act to bring such an increase about.Precipitation variability in southwestern South Africa in both the CMIP3 and CMIP5 simulations was analyzed, however, and found not to increase (or decrease) significantly during first half of the 21 st century. Thus no basis was found for including a cross-scale mechanism linking interannual precipitation variability in the subject region to global temperature change.The initialized decadal hindcast experiments being performed as part of CMIP5 were mentioned in Section 4.3.3. At present, predictive skill for SST appears limited to less than one decade in most oceanic regions, so the degree to which such simulations might help to constrain future terrestrial variations is not clear. However, ocean initialization has been limited by a lack of subsurface observations, a situation which is being remedied, and models are constantly being improved. There also may be particular regions where predictive skill is significant. While these outcomes remain to be determined, the potential for initialized forecasts to guide the evolution of modeled trend and low-frequency simulation components remains.We have described a framework for the generation of stochastic simulations, with the end in mind of driving agricultural or other applications models that require detailed climate information, including a realistic representation of decadal variability. The incorporation of such variability into impacts studies represents an advance over the simple comparison of mean states that has typically been performed in climate change impact studies.The approach presented is based loosely on classical time series analysis, in that an observational record, which is taken to represent regional climate variability, is decomposed into trend, systematic and random components, each of these being treated independently. An association is made between trend -a secular shift in the mean -and anthropogenic forcing. Accordingly, this component of variability is modeled by regression on a global mean temperature signal, meaning that it is modeled as a response to global temperature change, rather than simply as a time-dependent level. Detrending, as refracted through this procedural prism, then amounts to separating climatic changes due to anthropogenic effects, and natural variability intrinsic to the climate system itself. Possible problems that arise in attempting to effect such a separation using short time series were discussed.Trend having been removed, the residual variability is examined for evidence of systematic processes, in the sense that the residual variations differ significantly from AR(1) noise. If such processes are identified, they would be modeled as separate independent components, with the residual from this step modeled as an AR(1) stochastic process. This component of the analysis offers perhaps the widest latitude in the simulation scheme, depending as it does on the available climate records, which may exhibit widely varying characteristics. It was noted that the presence of regime like behaviour, although sometimes difficult to verify, may require state-based or other alternate model forms.It is hoped that the methodology outlined here will prove useful in delineating uncertainties owing to natural internal variability, in the context of a background climatic state undergoing secular forced shifts. Indeed, this is the situation in which we are likely to find ourselves in coming decades. The investigation and characterization of such uncertainties can play an important role in anticipating potential climate risks in the near term; the more confidently","tokenCount":"9993"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1704126739.json b/data/part_2/1704126739.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9083547df54f07c88a61fd48f1292abf434dc583 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1704126739.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6ba575b67892d004255d48e5317c2bb1","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/0c28c885-c64e-4b43-815f-cbbc534e9c0a/retrieve","id":"1414286155"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"329af8ee-dbc4-4bdc-9fb6-2779329dd8c4","pagecount":"3","content":"Ramón Gualdrón /) C05~El establecimiento de pastos es un proceso que implica riesgo y el éxito a obtener depende de factores como: clima, suelo, topografía, vegetación a controlar, especies a sembrar, plagas y enfermedades, disponibilidad y calidad de insumos, equipo disponible, mano de obra y costos en general. El manejo racional de los s uelos es una estrategia que responde a estos factores y a sus interacciones. La selección del tipo de labranza más adecuada es parte de esta estrategia.A manera de introducción y con el objetivo de estudiar los efectos de tipos de labranza y control de vegetación, con o sin herbicidas, .'• con el uso de un herbicida (Glifosato). f. phaseoloides CIAT 9900 fue afectado seriamente en su población, y los resultados presentaron un coeficiente de variabilidad alto (67.35%). En todos los casos, el uso de labranza convencional (tres pases de rastrillo), práctica muy generalizada en suelos más arcillosos, produjo rendimientos inferiores a los obtenidos con otros tipos de labranza más restringida. En todos los tratamientos se observaron evidencias de erosión, aunque con mayor intensidad en el tipo de labranza convencional (erosión en surcos).Dado que los costos de preparación de suelo bajo el sistema convencional constituyen un porcentaje alto de los costos totales de establecimiento y no presentan ventajas comparativas con respecto a otros tipos de labranza menos intensivos, un refinamiento del tipo de labranza de acuerdo a las especies a sembrar y tipo de suelos se hace indispensable.El uso de herbicidas como reemplazo de la labranza, dependiendo de su disponibilidad y costos de aplicación, se presenta como una alternativa para suelos en donde no es posible utilizar maquinaria y equipo de labranza por limitaciones de disponibilidad o de altos riesgos y pérdidas por erosión.","tokenCount":"287"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1715340698.json b/data/part_2/1715340698.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1ed7fb2ac98389735d29e959150b762413a577de --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1715340698.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ca9d5ff29bdf17c2e6dc21aeb9a9f132","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/a04a55e4-4b7f-48e8-8008-d9357b6498f3/retrieve","id":"-1678685042"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"ed5c49da-2786-45bf-9408-ac30cbb6de2d","pagecount":"8","content":"Policymakers and project implementers in Ghana recognize the need for gender and youth inclusion to harness opportunities in the agricultural value chain. However, this does not extend to the IVVC for several reasons. Vegetable production is seen as a secondary source of income for farmers and an alternative livelihood activity for vulnerable populations. Government interventions, therefore, focus more on growing cash crops, cereals, tubers and legumes, mainly in the rainy season. In addition, irrigated agriculture, including irrigated vegetable production, is mainly carried out in the dry season when government support is limited. Some nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) have collaborated with the Ministry of Food and Agriculture (MoFA) to support irrigated vegetable production in the dry season. Many of these interventions target women and youth, helping to boost vegetable production and local distribution, and create market links including connections to export markets. However, challenges remain. Project sustainability is limited, collaboration between interventions is low, and institutional arrangements for implementing policies and interventions are inadequate.To provide a better understanding of the context in which women and youth are included in or excluded from the IVVC, the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) carried out a comprehensive analysis of the policy framework and interventions (Ofosu and Minh Forthcoming). This work was carried out under the Africa Research in Sustainable Intensification for the Next Generation (Africa RISING) and Innovation Lab for Small-Scale Irrigation (ILSSI) projects, and the CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE), which ended in December 2021. A previously developed enabling environment analysis tool adapted to the IVVC (Minh et al. 2021) (Figure 1) was used in this study.The policy framework encompasses relevant policies and regulations that establish the basis for gender and youth inclusion in agricultural value chains, and the behaviors and power relationships of actors in the chain that affect this inclusion. Meanwhile, interventions encompass programs and projects as well as services and support provided by the government, private sector and other practitioners that aid gender and youth inclusion in these agricultural value chains.In total, 36 policies and 32 interventions were analyzed and categorized into clusters based on thematic areas. Cluster and cross-cluster analyses were then conducted to identify the aspects that help or hinder gender and youth inclusion in the IVVC. Finally, the results from the policy and intervention analysis were synthesized as a basis for making recommendations. This synthesis analysis focused on the actor and stakeholder landscape, highlighting the barriers to and opportunities for an inclusive IVVC created by the policies and interventions. The main barriers and opportunities are discussed below.Cash crops, grains, legumes and tubers, which are considered strategic food security crops, dominate agricultural policies. As a result, strategies targeting vegetable production are minimal, limiting the development of the vegetable sector. This is evident in government input subsidy support programs, which are only provided during the rainy season, depriving dry-season irrigated vegetable farmers of much-needed financial support (Mendes et al. 2014;Dittoh 2020).In line with the government's agricultural focus, research institutions favor the development of different varieties of grains, tubers and legumes. Vegetable seeds are often imported, bought from other farmers or used from previous harvests. Imported seeds might not be suitable for local cultivation, while the continuous use of farmer-retained seeds often leads to low yields and disease outbreaks. Farmers in Ghana are also unable to compete effectively with vegetables imported from Burkina Faso, where vegetables with a longer shelf life are cultivated.Fragmented responsibilities for women and youth development lead to duplication. Women and youth development, including in agriculture, is the responsibility of multiple ministries and government institutions. Not only are the roles of each institution not clearly defined, but this fragmentation has led to the duplication of effort by institutions, which limits impact. Delayed and insufficient funding for state institutions restricts their ability to carry out their functions. This includes low capital investment, resulting in the use of outdated machinery and equipment.Poor regulation and monitoring of activities lead to low accountability and multiple NGOs. Several NGOs operate in Ghana at the local, national and regional levels. However, their activities are poorly regulated, sometimes leading to duplication, inefficiencies, concentration in particular zones and regions, and poor management of project funds.Interventions in vegetable production focus on growing exotic and high-value vegetables for local markets and export. As such, women who often grow green leafy vegetables for home consumption and sale receive limited benefits. Vegetables that are commonly grown as a result of interventions include cabbage, cucumber, lettuce and peppers.Interventions often target improved production among women and youth, including improved access to markets and services such as extension and finance. However, behavioral change projects fail to address social barriers such as low extension delivery caused by norms that restrict non-family male-female interactions and cultural barriers to women owning land. Women farmers often have poor access to credit because they simply do not have the necessary collateral. Cultural norms also prevent many married women from obtaining credit without the consent of their husbands (Anang and Asante 2020;Atuobi-Yeboah et al. 2020).Interventions are dominated by input subsidy programs that are not sustainable in the long term. This could create dependency, leaving farmers unmotivated to save money to buy inputs in the future. Government initiatives such as the Fertilizer Subsidy Program and the Planting for Food and Jobs initiative encounter input supply challenges because the government is slow to pay suppliers.Existing and extensive policies and laws on agriculture, irrigation, land and water resources. These serve as a guide for policy implementers in terms of value chain development. Additionally, the National Employment Policy, volume 1 (GoG 2014), National Youth Policy of Ghana (GoG 2010) and National Gender Policy (GoG 2015a) provide guidelines to mainstream gender and youth.Policy focus on agricultural intensification through quality planting materials. The government recognizes the need for good, affordable seeds and planting materials to intensify agriculture. The National Seed Policy (GoG 2013) and National Seed Plan (GoG 2015b) provide guidelines for the local development, importation and classification of seeds and planting materials. Specific institutions have also been tasked with regulating and enforcing standards for seeds and planting materials. This offers an opportunity to develop high-quality seeds and planting materials, including vegetable seeds.Policy focus on developing irrigation infrastructure. The policy framework supports the use of innovative financing options, including public-private partnerships and private, government and donor funding, for developing irrigation infrastructure. This presents an opportunity for investment in the irrigation sector to improve access for both women and youth. For example, the government is rehabilitating the Kpong Irrigation Dam with support from private investors. The government is also building community dams under the One Village, One Dam initiative.Women are recognized as key stakeholders in water management, especially in communities. This presents an opportunity to increase women's membership in water users' associations (WUAs) to improve their access to irrigation facilities and water for agricultural use.Existing institutions such as MoFA, technical and mainstream universities, and the Crops Research Institute and the Soil Research Institute, both under the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) in Ghana, offer opportunities to find solutions to the challenges in irrigated vegetable production. This includes conducting research to identify high-yielding, climate-resilient and Vegetable interventions in Ghana mainly target high-value crops like cucumbers, while leafy greens receive limited support (photo: Nana Kofi Acquah).pest-resistant crop varieties, as well as finding innovative ways to deliver extension services and strengthen market links to increase productivity of the vegetable sector. The findings of this study show that the government is making significant efforts to develop agriculture, including irrigated agriculture, by formulating policies that regulate activities along the value chain. However, these policies focus mainly on inputs, irrigation and production. Collection and trade, distribution and consumption, and development of the entire value chain have yet to receive equal attention. Moreover, very few policies directly target vegetable production and, as a result, it has not gained importance in policy as a standalone sector. This results in gaps in the IVVC, limiting benefits to beneficiaries, including Public-private partnerships and flexible financing options like pay-as-you-go make irrigation technologies more affordable for women and young farmers in Ghana (photo: Hamish John Appleby/IWMI).women and youth. Unaddressed social and cultural barriers further inhibit gender and youth inclusion in the IVVC. While institutional arrangements to support vegetable production do exist, the lack of harmonization and coordination between institutions responsible for agriculture, energy and water management results in piecemeal development of the IVVC. To make the IVVC more inclusive and equitable for women and youth, the following are necessary:• Adopt integrated water resources management strategies.• Redefine the role of vegetables within the government's agricultural development strategy.• Enhance sustainable and inclusive interventions to support women and youth in the IVVC.• Facilitate multi-stakeholder dialogues, interactive learning and collaboration.Integrated water resources management (IWRM) is a process that promotes the coordinated development and management of water, land and related resources in order to maximize economic and social welfare in an equitable manner without compromising the sustainability of vital ecosystems and the environment (GWP 2011). Some recommendations in this area include the following:• Promote horizontal and vertical integration of sectors and institutions responsible for water management and water use. Policies and legislation should focus on integrating horizontal sectors that use water or affect available water resources. These sectors include agriculture, sanitation, environment, climate change, energy and industry. When accessing the water needed for agriculture, considering the needs of other sectors minimizes conflicts and ensures sustained use of the resource. Such conflicts often limit the ability of women and youth to engage in irrigated vegetable farming or related activities. In addition to horizontal integration, vertical integration is also required to coordinate efforts between local, national, regional and international water user groups and institutions. Interventions must be adaptive in nature to improve success rates. This includes taking into consideration male-female power relations, social norms on the use of water, cultural and religious beliefs, and social and cultural barriers to women and youth accessing productive assets.• Use full-cost pricing complemented by targeted subsidies.Farmers should pay the full price for water accessed for agricultural purposes. Where necessary, subsidies can be applied to improve access for vulnerable populations, including women and youth. This ensures that managers of irrigation facilities have adequate funds to maintain them. Additionally, it encourages farmers to adopt more waterefficient application methods and to reduce wastage of water, especially flooding of fields.• Strengthen the role of women and youth in agricultural water management. Women have traditionally been involved in managing water for domestic use at the community level.Because of male-female power relations, however, this does not extend significantly to the use of water for irrigation. Targeted efforts must be made to integrate women and youth into water management by placing them in managerial roles within WUAs. This helps to integrate their concerns into decision-making related to the use of water for irrigation.Vegetable production is seen as a secondary source of income for farmers and as an alternative livelihood activity for vulnerable populations. In addition, although vegetables have been exported regionally and internationally for several years, they are still classified as nontraditional exports. Therefore, development of the vegetable sector lags behind cocoa, coffee, tubers, grains and legumes. We recommend the following:• Prioritize vegetable production as a standalone sector.Vegetables for export and local consumption are increasing in importance because more consumers want to eat healthier meals. Offering the vegetable sector the same support as other crops in terms of inputs and extension services will help improve vegetable production and encourage women and youth to engage in on-or off-farm activities within the IVVC.• Set up research institutions for vegetables or vegetable research units within existing institutions. Cocoa and oil palm have dedicated research institutions that help produce suitable varieties for local production. Vegetables do not receive the same level of attention. Identifying vegetable varieties suitable for local production would minimize losses and encourage more women and youth to actively engage in the IVVC.• Strengthen vegetable associations to influence the objectives of policies and interventions. The Vegetable Producers and Exporters Association of Ghana has over 400 members who produce fresh vegetables for the national and international markets all year round. Government support in the form of training, creating market links and financial Irrigated vegetables are an important source of nutrition and income for women and youth in Ghana (photo: Hamish John Appleby/IWMI).assistance can help the association develop additional products for export, including green leafy vegetables, which are mainly produced by women. This also creates job opportunities for women and youth in the new value chains.Government and development partners acknowledge the need to help women and youth find employment or improve agricultural outputs. However, some interventions are irrelevant to the context, duplicated, uncoordinated or short term in nature, limiting the impact on beneficiaries. Recommendations include the following:• Scale context-relevant innovation bundles targeting smallholder women farmers and youth. Several interventions target the development of one aspect of agriculture, e.g., improving the availability of inputs or helping farmers to access extension and financial services. Research shows that bundling complementary and context-relevant innovationssuch as solar-powered pumps and affordable financing -are more likely to address farmers' needs and, therefore, improve uptake and use (IWMI 2021).• Accelerate sustainable financing to encourage inclusive investment in the IVVC. Youth and women's access to financing through informal channels such as village savings and loans groups and microfinance institutions is often not sufficient to increase their production and acquire technologies. The government can strengthen the capacity of the Agricultural Development Bank of Ghana to extend credit to women and youth in the medium to long term. This will support their acquisition of improved technologies for both on-and off-farm activities, including the cultivation of highvalue crops.• Facilitate private sector investment in and supply of irrigation equipment and services. Streamlining tax exemptions and making it easier for irrigation equipment suppliers to access these exemptions would reduce the cost of irrigation equipment by up to 19.5%. Moreover, measures to control the influx of cheap and inferior irrigation equipment -and thereby control unfair competition -would encourage the private sector to invest in local manufacturing. Additionally, data-driven tools can be used to support the private sector in tailoring their business to women and youth.For instance, IWMI partnered with Pumptech to segment its market in northern Ghana. With a clearer understanding of its customer groups, Pumptech modified its business model to include a pay-as-you-go or pay-as-you-own financing option that makes it easier for smallholders, including women and youth, to overcome the high upfront costs of buying a solar pump.• Several actors in the IVVC promote gender and youth inclusion with varying degrees of success. Regular meetings, interactions and collaborations give stakeholders the opportunity to learn from each other and work together to improve project impacts. We recommend the following: to share information on interventions aimed at supporting agriculture, including the IVVC, to improve access to project information. Further, standard templates for project reporting should be promoted. These will make it easier to compare impacts across projects and identify gaps in gender inclusion.• Encourage peer learning and information sharing. NGOs work in different parts of the country and gain knowledge and experience that can help other NGOs improve their efficiency and effectiveness. MoFA should organize regular meetings between relevant NGOs to share best practices in the IVVC and increase benefits to women and youth.• Multi-stakeholder dialogues. The challenges to developing the IVVC are multifaceted. IWMI organizes multi-stakeholder dialogues three or four times a year to discuss different aspects of these challenges (Minh et al. 2020). Focused on farmer-led irrigation, the dialogues provide an interactive learning and collaboration space for key stakeholders and actors to share experiences, insights and solutions, including ways to make the IVVC more inclusive for women and youth.","tokenCount":"2601"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1716504535.json b/data/part_2/1716504535.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7f9ddc70755ee7f74b3ea9aa73ec36b4f95158ef --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1716504535.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"de70d88d0234e65719a5c405b426b0a0","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/86e4892c-1465-40dc-8f44-40ecce8f10e1/retrieve","id":"-1233609856"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b3991046-45e8-4eb9-aa6b-7490706bc1c2","pagecount":"68","content":"Plan de acción estratégico para fortalecer la conservación y el uso de los recursos fitogenéticos mesoamericanos para la adaptación de la agricultura al cambio climáticoPlan de acción estratégico para fortalecer la conservación y el uso de los recursos fitogenéticos mesoamericanos para la adaptación de la agricultura al cambio climático paem 2014 -2024A. Eje conservación 1. Estrategias para la conservación en finca e in situ de los RFGAA 1.1. Promover territorios bioculturales sostenibles, integrados en programas y sistemas de conservación existentes 1.2. Reconocer, facilitar e incentivar los sistemas locales de semillas 2. Implementación de una nueva arquitectura del sistema de conservación ex situ para optimizar y racionalizar la conservación de los RFGAA mesoamericanos y mejorar su acceso y utilidad para los usuarios 2.1. Reestructuración y fortalecimiento de los sistemas nacionales de conservación ex situ 2.2. Definición y fortalecimiento de la arquitectura regional de conservación ex situResumen ejecutivo Introducción Resumen del análisis diagnóstico Formulación del Plan de Acción Visión del PAEM Objetivo del PAEM Ejes, estrategias, metas y actividades del PAEM1. Disponibilidad de materiales diversos e información sobre su potencial de uso 2. Diversificar fincas introduciendo un mayor número de cultivos como estrategia de gestión de riesgos climáticos con beneficios en cuanto a generación de ingresos, salud y seguridad alimentaria y nutricional 3. Innovaciones para un mejor aprovechamiento de la diversidad intraespecífica El Tratado Internacional, es el único instrumento jurídicamente vinculante mediante el cual los países acuerdan establecer un sistema multilateral eficaz, efectivo y transparente para facilitar el acceso a los recursos fitogenéticos para la alimentación y la agricultura (RFGAA) y compartir los beneficios de manera justa y equitativa. El Tratado tiene como objetivos la conservación y la utilización sostenible de los RFGAA y la distribución justa y equitativa de los beneficios derivados de su utilización, en armonía con el Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica, para una agricultura sostenible y seguridad alimentaria. A la fecha son 130 los países Partes Contratantes del Tratado Internacional.Para dar cumplimiento a estos objetivos, es necesario asegurar la existencia y disponibilidad de recursos financieros a nivel nacional e internacional de manera eficiente y complementaria. La Estrategia de Financiación del Tratado es un mecanismo para fortalecer los esfuerzos globales hacia la conservación y el uso sostenible de los RFGAA. A través de su Fondo de Distribución de Beneficios, el cual hace parte también del Sistema Multilateral del Tratado, se movilizan directamente fondos para apoyar proyectos para la conservación y el uso sostenible de RFGAA en países en desarrollo.El Fondo de Distribución de Beneficios del Tratado abrió su segunda convocatoria en el 2011 y aprobó la financiación de 19 proyectos (7 proyectos para la elaboración de planes de acción estratégicos y 12 proyectos de impacto inmediato). Uno de los proyectos aprobados y financiados por el Fondo de Distribución de Beneficios es el proyecto para la elaboración del Plan de Acción Estratégico para Fortalecer la Conservación y el Uso de los Recursos Fitogenéticos Mesoamericanos para la Adaptación de la Agricultura al Cambio Climático. (www.planttreaty.org).Tratado Internacional sobre los Recursos Fitogenéticos para la Alimentación y la Agricultura y su Fondo de Distribución de Beneficios esoamérica, uno de los centros de domesticación y diversificación de cultivos de importancia mundial, alberga una enorme riqueza de recursos fitogenéticos. Como esta región también enfrentará desafíos sin precedentes, impuestos por el cambio climático, tiene en estos recursos fitogenéticos un medio fundamental para adaptar sus sistemas agrícolas a los cambios anticipados, y así garantizar la seguridad alimentaria de la población.El Plan de Acción Estratégico para Fortalecer la Conservación y el Uso de los Recursos Fitogenéticos Mesoamericanos para la Adaptación de la Agricultura al Cambio Climático (PAEM) es un mapa de ruta a diez años para fortalecer la conservación, el acceso y el uso de los recursos fitogenéticos de Mesoamérica como elemento estratégico para la seguridad alimentaria y la adaptación de la agricultura al cambio climático y otras amenazas.El PAEM consta de seis ejes temáticos y sus actividades, a saber: (1) el eje conservación incluye, a) la conservación en finca e in situ de los recursos fitogenéticos, en donde se propone la creación y reconocimiento de territorios bioculturales integrados en programas de conservación existentes, y el apoyo a los sistemas locales de semillas, y b) un nuevo sistema de conservación ex situ eficiente, que permita un servicio óptimo a sus usuarios e inclusivo de los agricultores de pequeña escala;(2) el eje uso sostenible identifica medidas para facilitar la disponibilidad de variedades diversas sobre todo dadas las necesidades del cambio climático, para fomentar la diversificación de cultivos en las fincas, y para mejorar la difusión de variedades mejoradas;(3) el eje instituciones y políticas incluye las medidas de apoyo a los ejes de conservación y uso sostenible, los pasos hacia la implementación del Tratado Internacional sobre los Recursos Fitogenéticos para la Alimentación y la Agricultura en los países contratantes, y las medidas para implementar los derechos del agricultor; (4) el eje educación y fortalecimiento de capacidades describe acciones orientadas a permitir la plena y efectiva participación de organizaciones de agricultores, tomadores de decisiones, académicos y otros profesionales en la implementación del PAEM, así como acciones de divulgación para la sociedad en general;(5) el eje operacional identifica los marcos de articulación y mecanismos de coordinación regional necesarios para la ejecución del PAEM, los que incluyen la revitalización de las redes de recursos fitogenéticos y la coordinación con los organismos de gobierno regionales, entre otros; y (6) el eje financiación identifica las acciones necesarias para movilizar recursos en apoyo a la implementación del PAEM. Los ejes temáticos están interconectados entre sí y se anticipa que la implementación del Plan de Acción se hará de manera integrada.El Plan de Acción se ha formulado utilizando una metodología que combina el análisis de la evidencia científica acerca del estado actual de los Recursos Fitogenéticos para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (RFGAA) en la región, los retos y oportunidades respecto al cambio climático, y un amplio proceso participativo de actores de la región. La compilación y análisis exhaustivo de la evidencia científica y políticas relevantes acerca de la conservación, acceso y uso de los recursos fitogenéticos fue complementada con un estudio de bancos de germoplasma y una encuesta a más de cien agricultores de toda la región. Toda esta información se utilizó para generar un diagnóstico del estado de los recursos fitogenéticos en la región. Para el diagnóstico, el PAEM ha tomado como ejemplo a diez cultivos mesoamericanos y sus parientes silvestres: maíz, frijol, yuca, camote, calabaza, amaranto, chile, papaya, aguacate y un forraje nativo (Tripsacum), priorizados por su importancia para la seguridad alimentaria local, regional y global, su aporte en la diversificación de las dietas, la generación de ingresos y su potencial para la adaptación a estreses abióticos. Sin embargo, el PAEM, sus estrategias y actividades son relevantes para todos los recursos fitogenéticos para la alimentación y la agricultura de la región mesoamericana. Los resultados de los análisis efectuados y los documentos utilizados en los análisis se encuentran a la disposición del público en el sitio web ITZAMNÁ http://itzamna-mesoamerica.org.El diagnóstico se compartió con actores regionales en la primera consulta regional del PAEM realizada en Guatemala, y fue usado como base para la identificación de las acciones prioritarias a ser incluidas en el Plan de Acción. Con estos insumos se procedió a preparar el primer borrador del PAEM que fue subsecuentemente revisado y discutido en la segunda consulta regional realizada en Costa Rica. esoamérica, la región que comprende el sur de México y los siete países de América Central, es una de las zonas del continente americano más sensibles al cambio climático. Casi todos los modelos climáticos pronostican una disminución de la precipitación y un aumento de la sequía en las siguientes décadas. De hecho, ya se ha observado un aumento en los eventos meteorológicos extremos en la región, que afectan seriamente la infraestructura de los países y sus sistemas productivos, como ocurrió con los huracanes Mitch en 1998 y Stan en el 2005. Las estadísticas agrícolas de los últimos años muestran altibajos productivos, debido en su gran mayoría a problemas de clima, exceso o falta de lluvias y la incidencia de plagas y enfermedades asociadas. Para poder mantener la seguridad alimentaria de la región, reducir su vulnerabilidad, y aumentar la resiliencia 1 de los sistemas productivos frente a la gravedad de las perturbaciones climáticas anticipadas, será crucial desarrollar estrategias y acciones de adaptación eficientes y adecuadas para el sector agrícola.1 En el presente documento, resiliencia refiere a \"la capacidad de un sistema de recuperarse tras fenómenos de perturbación importantes\" (Adaptado de Thompson, 2011). Por otro lado, el cambio climático no es del todo nuevo para la agricultura. La domesticación de plantas y el origen de la agricultura coincidieron precisamente con el calentamiento global que marcó el final de la última glaciación, hace aproximadamente 10,000 años. A lo largo de la historia, cientos de generaciones de agricultores modificaron y adaptaron sus cultivos a diferentes ambientes bióticos, abióticos y culturales, resultando en la rica diversidad de recursos fitogenéticos con la que contamos hoy. Ahora que los cambios que se vislumbran son de una naturaleza y escala nunca vistos en la historia de la agricultura, es precisamente esta diversidad que hemos heredado la que representa la materia prima para seguir mejorando las especies cultivadas, adaptándolas a nuevas condiciones climáticas y responder al desafío de alimentar a una población creciente usando cada vez menos insumos. El mejor aprovechamiento de la diversidad genética regional dependerá de la capacidad de usar enfoques multidisciplinarios que maximicen la sinergia de las prácticas agrícolas tradicionales con los conocimientos y métodos científicos modernos.Afortunadamente para los países que lo conforman, Mesoamérica es uno de los principales centros de domesticación y diversificación de especies alimenticias en el mundo. Entre ellos, el maíz, que constituye no sólo la base de la dieta sino de la identidad cultural de muchos países de la región, el frijol, importante fuente de proteína vegetal, y varias hortalizas, frutales y raíces como los chiles, el amaranto, las calabazas, el aguacate, la papaya, el camote y la yuca. La conservación y el uso sostenible de los recursos fitogenéticos de estas, y otros cultivos nativos junto con sus parientes silvestres, son claves para la adaptación de la agricultura no sólo en la región sino también en los demás países que dependen de cultivos de origen mesoamericano para su seguridad alimentaria.Reproducido por M. Beltrán -Bioversity http://www/ccafs-climate.org/data/ Está claro que el cambio climático no respeta las fronteras nacionales. Del mismo modo, la conservación, adaptación y uso sostenible de los recursos fitogenéticos regionales no son prerrogativa o responsabilidad exclusiva de un país u otro. Por lo tanto, la adaptación de los sistemas de producción agrícola que aproveche de esta riqueza en recursos fitogenéticos debe ser una iniciativa conjunta entre todos los países de la región, de tal modo que esta adaptación sea más rápida, eficaz y eficiente.De todas estas consideraciones, surgió la inquietud de elaborar el presente Plan de Acción Estratégico, que constituye una guía multidisciplinaria e integrada de acciones a diez años para fortalecer el papel de los recursos fitogenéticos conservados en Mesoamérica en la adaptación de la agricultura al cambio climático. ¡El momento de hacer mayores inversiones para salvaguardar nuestra seguridad alimentaria es ahora! Los recursos fitogenéticos mesoamericanos están actualmente conservados en colecciones de germoplasma nacionales o internacionales (en condiciones ex situ), en ecosistemas naturales (conservación in situ de los parientes silvestres) y en los campos de los agricultores (manejo de la diversidad cultivada en finca). Sin embargo, la conservación tanto ex situ como in situ y en finca de estos recursos es deficiente, y su uso en investigación y en producción es limitado, de tal modo que su potencial para responder a los desafíos del cambio climático presente y futuro está por realizarse.La conservación in situ y en finca de la agrobiodiversidad debería enfocarse en los paisajes agrícolas y territorios indígenas, e integrarse con acciones existentes de conservación de la biodiversidad silvestre. El papel de los agricultores en la conservación de la agrobiodiversidad y su mejoramiento en finca debe ser reconocido y fortalecido, y se deben buscar los incentivos para que las comunidades sigan brindando este servicio de conservación dinámica de los RFGAA.Para aprovechar más eficientemente las fortalezas que ya existen en términos de capital humano y de infraestructura en los bancos de germoplasma en los diferentes países, es preciso hacer una racionalización de las colecciones y establecer una mejor coordinación con entidades regionales e internacionales, así como con organizaciones comunitarias, con el fin de promover los flujos de germoplasma desde y hacia los bancos de conservación ex situ, para fomentar y agilizar su uso.Son necesarias iniciativas para la identificación de material promisorio que estén enfocadas en caracteres adaptativos y de resistencia para enfrentar perturbaciones bióticas y abióticas, las que están siendo exacerbadas por el cambio climático. Estas iniciativas agregarían valor al material conservado en los bancos, y mejorarían las perspectivas para su uso en programas de mejoramiento genético convencional o participativo. Un mejor acceso a datos climáticos de calidad reforzaría la capacidad de orientar los esfuerzos de conservación y mejoramiento de los recursos fitogenéticos de la región. Es también esencial que se disponga de mecanismos ágiles y flexibles para la distribución de una diversidad de semillas tradicionales y mejoradas, tanto para garantizar respuestas rápidas luego de desastres, como también la pronta adopción de materiales adaptados, para contribuir así al mantenimiento de la producción en condiciones de estrés climático.Para poner en marcha acciones integradas que apoyen la conservación y el uso de los RFGAA en Mesoamérica es fundamental crear un entorno institucional favorable, concientizando a los tomadores de decisiones de diferentes sectores (ambiente, agricultura, salud, cambio climático, entre otras) y elevando el perfil de los RFGAA en las múltiples estrategias e iniciativas técnicas e institucionales que se están llevando a cabo bajo el paraguas del cambio climático.El desarrollo del PAEM tuvo lugar a lo largo de un año, empezando con un diagnóstico del estado de conservación y uso de diez cultivos representativos para la región y de los marcos institucionales nacionales, regionales e internacionales relativos a la conservación y el manejo de los RFGAA. El diagnóstico, que fue compartido y validado por expertos regionales, llevó a identificar oportunidades y retos que están resumidos a continuación (el informe completo del diagnóstico se puede encontrar en el sitio web ITZAMNÁ (http://itzamna-mesoamerica.org, sección Proyecto PAEM), respetando la división en ejes temáticos adoptados durante el proceso mismo de formulación del PAEM.Estado de conservación en finca e in situ Análisis geoespacial• Bajo un escenario de \"business as usual\", el cambio climático causaría cambios sustanciales en la extensión y ubicación de áreas idóneas para el crecimiento de la mayoría de las especies cultivadas y sus parientes silvestres. • Las áreas idóneas para el cultivo de la mayoría de las especies consideradas en este diagnóstico podrían sufrir desplazamientos en el futuro. En áreas montañosas los desplazamientos serían mayormente altitudinales.Proyecciones climáticas para 358 especies de parientes silvestres• Para algunas especies cultivadas, la superficie de las áreas idóneas podría aumentar, pero para la mayoría de las especies los modelos predicen reducciones netas de las áreas idóneas actuales. Las reducciones podrían ser más severas para las especies cultivadas más importantes para la alimentación humana. • Para paliar las reducciones y desplazamientos de las áreas idóneas es preciso promover la identificación, movimiento y adaptación del germoplasma potencialmente adaptado ya existente en la región.• Para la mayoría de los parientes silvestres de las especies cultivadas los modelos predicen incrementos potenciales de las áreas idóneas. La conservación de la mayoría de parientes silvestres se beneficiaría simplemente de una mayor interconectividad entre las regiones ecológicas lo que permitiría su migración natural.Cambios en idoneidad ambiental desde el presente hasta el 2050Las proyecciones sugieren que la gran mayoría de áreas podrían tener condiciones idóneas -de celeste a azul-para la expansión de poblaciones de especies de parientes silvestres más allá de su distribución actual. Muchos lugares serían favorables para albergar hasta 69 especies más que en la actualidadElaborado por E. Thomas y M. Beltrán -Bioversity• El hecho de que casi todos los parientes silvestres podrían aumentar sus áreas idóneas bajo cambio climático indicaría que tendrían genes interesantes para el mejoramiento de las especies cultivadas. Actualmente, el potencial de los parientes silvestres para el mejoramiento de las especies cultivadas está subutilizado. • Las áreas protegidas actualmente en Mesoamérica tienen muy poca coincidencia con las áreas de mayor diversidad de especies y de los parientes silvestres considerados en este estudio, amenazando así su conservación.• Una estrategia más integrada e inclusiva para la conservación in situ debe enfocarse no solamente en la diversidad en recursos fitogenéticos, sino también en la diversidad cultural, porque son las poblaciones rurales y particularmente las comunidades indígenas y locales quienes conservan y son los guardianes de la diversidad de plantas cultivadas, y sin su involucramiento activo, la conservación in situ no puede funcionar.• Una estrategia de conservación en finca e in situ integrada tanto en las áreas protegidas existentes como en los territorios de comunidades indígenas y locales, lograría la adecuada conservación de la mayoría de los RFGAA de la región.• Para hacer seguimiento a las tendencias temporales y espaciales del estado de conservación de las especies cultivadas en finca e in situ hace falta reforzar los sistemas de monitoreo existentes en la región.Análisis geoespacial• Los datos de pasaporte de las accesiones conservadas en los bancos nacionales y regionales de Mesoamérica tienen problemas serios de calidad. Esto, combinado con la reducida accesibilidad a los datos complica la realización de ejercicios de análisis de vacíos o de priorización. Esta situación debe ser subsanada con prioridad para aprovechar efectivamente los recursos conservados en estos bancos• Existen vacíos geográficos significativos en las colecciones ex situ, para los RFGAA tanto cultivados como silvestres.• Dada la amplitud de los vacíos geográficos hacen falta estrategias de priorización para planificar más eficientemente las nuevas misiones de colecta, enfocándose en las plantas cultivadas y silvestres con mayor potencial de presentar atributos de valor o interesantes para la adaptación al cambio climático. Dichas estrategias deben aprovechar los conocimientos existentes de una variedad de disciplinas científicas, como la genética, la antropología, la ecología, la climatología, las ciencias agrícolas, entre otras.• La identificación de germoplasma promisorio es particularmente pertinente para los parientes silvestres, dado que algunos acervos genéticos cuentan con un número alto de ellos (Ej. Ipomoea spp., 169 especies) y hay que priorizar los que tengan utilidad o potencial directo para el mejoramiento de las especies cultivadas.• Los bancos en la región tienen diferentes propósitos y niveles de infraestructura que les permitiría jugar papeles diferentes y complementarios en una estrategia regional de conservación ex situ. • En comparación con el papel de los bancos internacionales que mantienen colecciones grandes de géneros de importancia global como fríjol, camote y yuca, los bancos locales y regionales tienen un papel crucial en la conservación de géneros regionalmente valiosos como calabazas, chiles, papayas y aguacates. • Existen colecciones grandes de maíz en bancos locales, regionales e internacionales. Habría que ver cómo optimizar la conservación ex situ de este género, en una estrategia regional coordinada con bancos internacionales.• Los programas públicos de mejoramiento genético en los países tienden a enfocarse en granos básicos, sobre todo maíz y fríjol, con relativamente poca inversión en otros cultivos. • Existe poca inversión, tecnología y capacidad técnica para que programas de pre-mejoramiento usen materiales disponibles en los bancos y en las fincas de los agricultores. La mayoría de los materialesCambios en idoneidad ambiental desde el presente hasta el 2050Las proyecciones sugieren que en la mayoría de áreas, de rosado a rojo, las condiciones climáticas podrían ser desfavorables para el cultivo de estas especies, con áreas donde hasta 14 especies no podrán cultivarse en comparación al presente. En ciertas áreas, de celeste a azul, las condiciones podrían ser más favorables para más especies que en el presente, hasta un máximo de nueve especies que antes no podían cultivarse en estas áreasElaborado por E. Thomas y M. Beltrán -Bioversity• Los bancos mesoamericanos tienen limitaciones para la distribución de material por falta de un sistema formal de solicitud y una baja cantidad de materiales conservados por accesión. La mayoría del germoplasma solicitado a los bancos por actores externos es usado directamente en el campo para producción e investigación. • Existen vacíos específicos en datos de pasaporte y clasificación taxonómica de géneros regionalmente importantes como calabazas, chiles, papayas y aguacates. Para maíz y fríjoles hay mayor avance en la caracterización y evaluación en comparación con los otros géneros. • Para maíz y fríjoles hay un vacío marcado en la evaluación de material para estrés biótico. Para los géneros que incluyen calabazas, chiles, papayas y aguacates hay vacíos de evaluación en cuanto a estrés abiótico y biótico.Cambios netos en las áreas idóneas para el crecimiento de especies cultivadas que luego se liberan como variedades en el país vienen de las instituciones internacionales y unos cuantos de organizaciones regionales (CATIE, Escuela Agrícola Panamericana El Zamorano).• Hay cierto énfasis en la búsqueda o el desarrollo de caracteres de adaptación al cambio climático en granos básicos, pero muy poco en otros cultivos.• Existe un programa regional de fitomejoramiento participativo que ha sido muy exitoso, tanto en el involucramiento y capacitación de los agricultores como en la generación de variedades relevantes para los sistemas productivos locales. También ese enfoque se ha centrado en maíz y frijol y según el país, en otros cultivos no nativos (arroz y sorgo). No se ha dado espacio todavía a otras especies nativas y de potencial valor para diversificar aún más los sistemas productivos.• A pesar de la importancia de los sistemas locales de semillas, sobre todo en algunos rubros, (frijol entre los granos básicos y otros cultivos) ninguna ley nacional reconoce estos sistemas ni se han adoptado acciones sistemáticas para promoverlos o mejorarlos a nivel nacional. Sin embargo, acciones asociadas a los programas de fitomejoramiento participativo tienden a fortalecer los sistemas de semillas informales o del agricultor y han permitido mejorar significativamente la calidad de la semilla que llega a los usuarios, sobre todo en zonas marginales y vulnerables.• Programas nacionales o regionales (como Semillas para el Desarrollo, coordinado por la FAO) han sido instrumentales en promover el desarrollo de sistemas de semillas flexibles y funcionales, al integrar elementos del sistema formal e informal.• En el marco de iniciativas de fitomejoramiento participativo o de respuestas a desastres, varios países en la región tienen experiencias muy valiosas de conservación comunitaria de semillas criollas. Aunque se enfoquen en granos básicos, hay un espacio para que se amplíe el portafolio de especies conservadas a corto plazo con ese mecanismo descentralizado de conservación para uso.• La cantidad y calidad de los datos meteorológicos es bastante deficiente para poder desarrollar modelos climáticos presentes y futuros específicos para la región. Para guiar mejor los esfuerzos de adaptación de la agricultura basados en RFGAA, que tome en cuenta la diversidad climática de la región, hace falta un esfuerzo importante para crear más datos meteorológicos de buena calidad y hacerlos disponibles. • Todos los países mesoamericanos que son partes contratantes del Tratado Internacional sobre RFGAA han participado en el desarrollo del PAEM y ellos también son Partes Contratantes del Convenio sobre Diversidad Biológica. Sin embargo, los países han avanzado más en el desarrollo de legislación nacional bajo el CDB que bajo el TIRFAA. En muchos países esto resulta en cierto vacío e incertidumbre legal sobre cómo acceder a los RFGAA y cómo distribuir los beneficios asociados a ellos, tanto en condiciones ex situ como in situ. Tampoco se ha avanzado en otros aspectos de la implementación del Tratado, como por ejemplo el Art. 9 sobre Derechos del Agricultor.• Las políticas regionales y nacionales agropecuarias o de seguridad alimentaria contienen planes e iniciativas que incorporan, en medida más o menos explícita, la conservación y el uso de los RFGAA. En ese marco institucional caben muchas de las iniciativas de fitomejoramiento (convencional o participativo), de fortalecimiento de sistemas de semillas, de diversificación en los sistemas productivos, de agricultura orgánica y familiar. Sin embargo, no siempre se considera una visión holística del rol de los RFGAA, de un número más amplio de especies y sus variedades, aparte de los granos básicos.• Las políticas regionales y nacionales de gestión ambiental y adaptación al cambio climático no hacen referencia específica a la conservación y el uso de los RFGAA como herramienta clave para el desarrollo http://itzamna-mesoamerica.org/ Los resultados de este diagnóstico han sido el punto de partida para la identificación consensuada de las acciones que conforman el Plan de Acción Estratégico para Mesoamérica. El resumen esquemático se encuentra en el Anexo 2. La implementación del PAEM a lo largo de los próximos diez años, contribuirá al fortalecimiento de la conservación y el uso de los recursos fitogenéticos en la región, y es armónico con el cumplimiento de compromisos internacionales adquiridos por los países, entre los cuales se destacan el Convenio de Diversidad Biológica, el Tratado Internacional de Recursos Fitogenéticos para la Alimentación y la Agricultura y el Segundo Plan de Acción Mundial para los Recursos Fitogenéticos para la Alimentación y la Agricultura.• Existe un desfase entre la riqueza en RFGAA cultivados y silvestres en la región, y la capacidad para utilizarlos plenamente.• En resumen, las necesidades de capacitación incluyen la facilitación de acceso a información de varias fuentes, interpretar esta información para que pueda ser aplicada, mejorar el uso del conocimiento generado para la toma de decisiones y la coproducción de conocimiento, lo que a su vez facilitaría la generación de innovaciones.• En general, el tema de conservación y uso de los RFGAA tiende a ser del dominio de un grupo de expertos bastante reducido y con necesidad de relevo generacional.• A nivel universitario, a pesar de que el tema de RFGAA se trata mayormente en las facultades de agricultura, este se beneficiaría de una mayor visibilidad y también se podría desarrollar o aprovechar más de acuerdos colaborativos entre instituciones de educación superior y otras entidades públicas encargadas de la conservación y el uso de los RFGAA, como los bancos de germoplasma, los programas de mejoramiento genético, convencional o participativo.• Se reconoce la falta de fitomejoradores y de una nueva generación de extensionistas, tanto para introducir en la agenda de trabajo en RFGAA el uso de herramientas tecnológicas y moleculares, como para fortalecer las investigaciones participativas con los agricultores.• Hay poco diálogo entre expertos en temas de ambiente, cambio climático y expertos en RFGAA, sobre todo en la toma y análisis de datos meteorológicos.• Los tomadores de decisiones tanto a escala nacional como regional no tienen mucho conocimiento sobre los RFGAA y así se pierde la oportunidad de incorporarlos en acciones eficaces en otros sectores, desde el desarrollo agropecuario y rural (incluso en cadenas de mercado), hasta la seguridad alimentaria, la adaptación al cambio climático y las respuestas a desastres.• Aunque los agricultores están muy conscientes de los cambios desatados por el cambio climático reclaman mayor información climática local, semillas adaptadas, y peritos que puedan asesorarlos en la interpretación de esta información.• El tema de los RFGAA está relativamente alejado de la atención y la apreciación de la sociedad civil, también por la falta de inversión en campañas de educación y sensibilización que muestren su relevancia cotidiana en la alimentación y la salud de estos recursos y traduzcan conceptos científicos y terminología técnica en un lenguaje de fácil comprensión.de acciones concretas en el terreno. Esto en parte se debe a una escasa coordinación entre las agendas de los diferentes Ministerios competentes en materia de ambiente y cambio climático (Ambiente) y de RFGAA (Agricultura). Los planes de respuesta a desastres incorporan aún menos el tema de los RFGAA no obstante algunas experiencias exitosas a nivel comunitario y local.l Plan de Acción Estratégico Mesoamericano se ha formulado con base en un análisis científico exhaustivo del estado de conservación y uso de los recursos fitogenéticos (el diagnóstico), evidencia que ha sido validada y enriquecida por medio de un amplio proceso participativo de consulta con actores regionales relevantes. Un Comité Asesor 2 compuesto por expertos en los temas del PAEM ha participado paso a paso en todo el proceso de formulación, desde la definición de las agendas de las consultas, la identificación de los participantes, hasta una intervención activa en las consultas regionales, y finalmente la revisión de las sucesivas versiones del borrador del PAEM.Los primeros seis meses del proyecto de formulación del PAEM, fueron dedicados a la compilación de información sobre el estado de los recursos fitogenéticos en Mesoamérica. Este ejercicio de diagnóstico se enfocó en diez cultivos nativos y sus parientes silvestres(o sea los acervos genéticos) correspondientes a los siguientes géneros: Zea (maíz), Phaseolus (frijol), Manihot (yuca), Ipomoea (camote), Cucurbita (calabaza), Amaranthus (amaranto), Capsicum (chile), Carica (papaya), Persea (aguacate) y Tripsacum (forraje).Estos acervos fueron seleccionados teniendo en cuenta, entre otras cosas, (i) su priorización por expertos regionales, (ii) su importancia regional y global para la seguridad alimentaria (maíz, frijol, yuca y camote), (iii) su importancia para las comunidades indígenas y locales de la Región, (iv) su aporte en la diversificación de la dieta y generación de ingresos (papaya, chile, aguacate y calabaza), (v) ser cultivos subutilizados a pesar de su reconocido valor nutricional (el amaranto), y (vi) su potencial para la adaptación a perturbaciones donde son notables las generadas por el cambio climático. Se incorporaron en el análisis los parientes silvestres de estos cultivos por el gran potencial de sus genes para el mejoramiento de las mismas especies cultivadas, tanto en términos de adaptación al cambio climático como resistencia a plagas y enfermedades.Para tener una mejor idea del estado de conservación ex situ, in situ y en finca de los recursos fitogenéticos se ejecutó un análisis geoespacial que cubrió los siguientes temas: (i) el impacto climático potencial (proyectado hacia 2050) tanto para las especies cultivadas como para sus parientes silvestres; (ii) los vacíos en la diversidad de recursos fitogenéticos actualmente conservados en bancos de germoplasma (incluyendo una priorización de áreas para futuras colectas); (iii) la identificación de germoplasma con características potenciales de adaptación a las condiciones climáticas futuras que se encuentra conservado en bancos de germoplasma; (iv) el estado de conservación in situ de los parientes silvestres; y (v) la identificación de áreas prioritarias que conservarían la mayor diversidad de recursos fitogenéticos, cultivados y silvestres de la región. Las principales fuentes de datos usados para este análisis geoespacial fueron las bases de datos de los bancos de germoplasma de los Centros Internacionales del CGIAR (Genesys, ex Singer), datos de herbarios y del GBIF, y publicaciones científicas, entre otras. Un total de 384 especies: 26 cultivadas y 358 silvestres, fueron incluidas en los análisis. Los análisis geo-espaciales resultaron en un total de más de 3.000 mapas de estas especies cultivadas y sus parientes silvestres.Además de los análisis descritos en el párrafo anterior, y para evaluar el estado de conservación de los recursos fitogenéticos en los bancos de germoplasma mesoamericanos, se enviaron -en colaboración con CATIE-encuestas a 25 bancos, 17 de los cuales respondieron, desde México a Panamá.Con el fin de obtener una mejor idea del estado de conservación y uso de los recursos fitogenéticos por parte de agricultores a pequeña escala se llevaron a cabo encuestas con 144 representantes de comunidades agrícolas locales e indígenas en talleres organizados por ASOCUCH en Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua y Costa Rica.Discusión sobre el estado de conservación y uso de RFG por agricultores, Nicaragua ASOCUCH Los anteriores diagnósticos fueron complementados con una búsqueda de los dispositivos, regulaciones y leyes existentes en la región y los países participantes, relevantes para la conservación y el uso de los recursos fitogenéticos, incluyendo la oferta de capacitación y entrenamiento disponible. Se recopilaron y revisaron publicaciones científicas, documentos de política, literatura secundaria y estadísticas nacionales, así como los informes de los países a la FAO para el Segundo Reporte del Estado Mundial de los Recursos Fitogenéticos.La formulación del Plan de Acción Estratégico que siguió a esta fase diagnóstica se llevó a cabo de manera participativa, con el concurso de la comunidad científica, académica, representantes de comu-Participantes en la segunda Consulta Regional, Costa Rica, 20133 Walter Quirós -Director Ejecutivo de la Oficina Nacional de Semillas de Costa Rica, Aura de Borja -Encargada del Banco de Germoplasma del Centro Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria y Forestal del Salvador (CENTA), Samuel Ajquejay -Auditor de Fitozoogenética del Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Alimentación de Guatemala, Elizabeth Santacreo -Punto Focal de la Dirección de Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria de Honduras y Roberto Mancilla -Coordinador del consejo para la protección de obtenciones vegetales del Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario de Panamá.nidades campesinas e indígenas, centros de conservación ex situ nacionales y regionales, autoridades nacionales de los países mesoamericanos en materia agrícola y ambiental, organizaciones de gobierno regional, organizaciones agrícolas regionales, centros de investigación del Grupo Consultivo de Investigación Agrícola Internacional, entre otros. Los detalles de este proceso se describen en los siguientes párrafos y la lista de todos los participantes y sus afiliaciones se encuentran en el Anexo 1.La selección de participantes en las consultas siguió un proceso iterativo, de consulta muy cercana, con los Puntos Focales del Tratado Internacional en los países 3 o sus designados, complementado con las sugerencias del Comité Asesor del PAEM. A finales del 2012, se llevó a cabo la primera consulta en la ciudad de Guatemala, con la participación de 73 representantes de los sectores mencionados, quienes durante tres días se abocaron a la tarea de revisar y avalar el diagnóstico, identificar información faltante y posibles fuentes para obtenerla. En enero de 2013 se inició la preparación del primer borrador del PAEM, teniendo como insumos los estudios de diagnóstico y los resultados de la consulta regional realizada en Guatemala. El Comité Asesor del PAEM lo revisó en marzo del 2013. El segundo borrador del PAEM fue presentado y discutido con 32 actores relevantes y autoridades nacionales de los países involucrados, durante una segunda consulta regional de formulación del PAEM llevada a cabo en Costa Rica. Posteriormente, este documento fue revisado de acuerdo con las recomendaciones y sugerencias recibidas durante esta segunda consulta y la versión consensuada fue enviada al Comité Asesor del proyecto y a la Secretaría del CAC.El Consejo Agropecuario Centroamericano-CAC en su reunión ordinaria de ministros, llevada a cabo en Ciudad de Panamá, Panamá el 1o y 2 de agosto de 2013, con la presencia de Ministros y Viceministros acordó respaldar el Plan de Acción Estratégico para fortalecer la conservación y uso de los recursos fitogenéticos de Mesoamérica como alternativa de adaptación al cambio climático (PAEM). El CAC instó e instruyó a la Secretaría Ejecutiva del CAC para que facilite la articulación del PAEM con el Grupo Técnico de Cambio Climático y Gestión Integral del Riesgo, el SICTA y otras iniciativas afines en el marco del CAC. Asimismo, el Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura ofreció respaldo a la puesta en marcha del PAEM.Todos los análisis realizados para los estudios diagnósticos y los documentos se encuentran a disposición del público en el sitio web ITZAMNÁ, http://itzamna-mesoamerica.orgFormulación del Plan de AcciónDurante los próximos diez años se mejora la conservación, acceso y uso de los recursos fitogenéticos mesoamericanos, como elemento estratégico para la seguridad alimentaria y la adaptación de la agricultura al cambio climático y otras amenazas.del PAEMLos agricultores de Mesoamérica utilizan la riqueza de los recursos fitogenéticos para producir alimentos suficientes en sistemas agrícolas diversificados y resilientes ante el cambio climático y otras amenazas, teniendo acceso a estos recursos que están conservados adecuadamente para la región y el mundo.N. Palmer -CIAT Ejes, estrategias, metas y actividades del PAEM l eje conservación incorpora estrategias dirigidas a la conservación in situ y ex situ de recursos fitogenéticos para la alimentación y la agricultura. La conservación en finca de los RFGAA cultivados y sus parientes silvestres se fomenta con acciones concretas, integradas, en las que se reconoce el rol central que juegan los agricultores en interacción con su entorno, en territorios bioculturales que merecen ser establecidos y reconocidos de tal modo que los sistemas locales de semillas, que son el corazón de la agrobiodiversidad en estos territorios, se fortalezcan y continúen evolucionando. Para la conservación ex situ, se propone una nueva arquitectura que organice los bancos de germoplasma en red para así servir a los usuarios de los materiales conservados -incluyendo los pequeños agricultores-de manera eficiente y efectiva.A. Eje conservación E 1. Estrategias para la conservación en finca e in situ de los RFGAA Esta estrategia responde a la necesidad de fomentar la conservación in situ de los RFGAA cultivados y sus parientes silvestres, a través de intervenciones holísticas que tomen en cuenta la relación recíproca existente entre las sociedades humanas y los RFGAA. Se propone el establecimiento y el reconocimiento formal de territorios bioculturales así como su integración en las redes y programas nacionales de conservación existentes.El concepto territorio biocultural 4 se refiere al conjunto de los recursos biológicos, incluida la diversidad en RFGAA y los paisajes y ecosistemas de los cuales son parte, así como las tradiciones y buenas prácticas agrícolas de las poblaciones rurales, sumadas las comunidades indígenas y locales, que muchas veces son creadoras de los recursos fitogenéticos cultivados y guardianes de la agrobiodiversidad. El establecimiento y buen manejo de territorios bioculturales requiere tanto de información de línea base que describa todos los aspectos claves de dichos territorios, como de mecanismos de monitoreo que usen indicadores sencillos acordados regionalmente. Por lo tanto son considerados como partes integrales de las estrategias de conservación en finca e in situ.Para lograr una conservación efectiva de los RFGAA cultivados se considera clave fortalecer y reconocer los sistemas locales de semillas como elementos fundamentales para el mantenimiento de la agrobiodiversidad en territorios bioculturales.Meta: Territorios bioculturales sostenibles establecidos e integrados en iniciativas existentes de conservación en la región mesoamericana que contribuyen a una mejor conservación y uso in situ de los RFGAA y de los conocimientos, procesos de innovación y prácticas de la población rural, incluidas las comunidades indígenas y locales.Actividades a. Establecer criterios regionales armonizados, reconociendo las diferencias y las necesidades nacionales, para la identificación y delimitación de territorios bioculturales, incluyendo los casos transfronterizos.b. Establecer una línea base de conocimiento del estado de la conservación y uso de los recursos fitogenéticos cultivados y sus parientes silvestres, y de los conocimientos y prácticas tradicionales asociados a estos (cultural, ceremonial, culinaria, medicinal, etc.).• Identificar, desarrollar y adoptar indicadores sencillos a escala regional, relevantes para el establecimiento de la línea base y el monitoreo posterior, teniendo en cuenta temas de género, etnicidad y vulnerabilidad.Las áreas donde se superponen la mayor diversidad de cultivos, hoy y en el 2050, con la presencia de grupos lingüísticos ofrecen las mejores condiciones para priorizar la conservación en finca • Elaborar diagnósticos de los procesos agrícolas existentes, y en particular los vinculados a la conservación y uso de la agrobiodiversidad y su importancia económica y cultural para la población rural, con inclusión de las comunidades indígenas y locales. • Realizar inventarios nacionales de recursos fitogenéticos cultivados y sus parientes silvestres, involucrando actores locales relevantes, por ejemplo en la elaboración de registros comunitarios, y promover su sistematización a nivel regional. • Identificar áreas de alta riqueza de los RFGAA, tanto en finca como en hábitats silvestres.• Identificar las principales amenazas que enfrentan la conservación y uso de los RFGAA en finca y hábitats silvestres en los países de la región mesoamericana. • Utilizar Sistemas de Información Geográfica (SIG) para mejorar el conocimiento acerca de las dinámicas temporales y espaciales, pasadas y presentes, de la agrobiodiversidad en la región mesoamericana.c. Crear incentivos dirigidos a pequeños agricultores, comunidades indígenas y locales que contribuyen a la conservación in situ y al uso de la agrobiodiversidad como componente central de su modo de vida, con énfasis en áreas de alta riqueza de RFGAA, que mejoren la conservación y el uso de los RFGAA cultivados y silvestres. 5 d. Fomentar la documentación, uso e intercambio de los conocimientos, innovaciones y prácticas tradicionales asociados a la agrobiodiversidad. 6Las accesiones de yuca colectadas en las áreas más secas y más calientes y conservadas en bancos de germoplasma internacionales podrían ser incluidas en futuros programas de cultivo y fitomejoramientoManihot esculenta Crantz e. Restaurar paisajes agrícolas degradados a través de la diversificación de los RFGAA en los sistemas productivos y el uso sostenible de la tierra, incluso mediante la repatriación de cultivos nativos y variedades locales y la aplicación de prácticas agrícolas sostenibles con el fin de (i) promover la conservación de los RFGAA mediante su uso; (ii) lograr resiliencia de los sistemas productivos; (iii) fortalecer la seguridad alimentaria y nutricional, y (iv) reafirmar la identidad cultural de las comunidades.f. Incentivar o reforzar la conectividad ecológica en el conjunto de paisajes agrícolas y áreas protegidas (corredores biológicos) para facilitar la migración de los parientes silvestres y de los polinizadores indispensables para sostener la producción agrícola. g. Incluir la conservación in situ de los parientes silvestres en las estrategias nacionales de biodiversidad, y en particular en los planes de manejo de las áreas naturales protegidas. h. Elaborar planes de manejo de territorios bioculturales enfocados en RFGAA, en armonía con iniciativas internacionales relevantes. i. Fortalecer los sistemas nacionales de monitoreo para identificar y evaluar tanto las tendencias en la conservación in situ de los RFGAA, como el impacto de las prácticas actuales y nuevas intervenciones, mediante la creación y adopción de protocolos comunes en todos los países, mecanismos de coordinación nacionales y regionales, y el uso de herramientas analíticas, como los sistemas de información geográfica.Meta: Sistemas locales de semillas funcionales y diversos que facilitan el acceso, el uso y la conservación en finca de los RFGAA cultivados.Actividades a. Establecer una línea base de conocimiento sobre los sistemas locales de semillas.• Identificar, desarrollar y adoptar indicadores sencillos a nivel regional, relevantes para el establecimiento de la línea base y el monitoreo posterior. • Realizar inventarios nacionales de agricultores y de asociaciones líderes en conservación y uso de agrobiodiversidad. • Identificar los factores determinantes para asegurar la sostenibilidad y el fomento de los sistemas locales de semillas.7 Esta actividad se debe implementar considerando la actividad D.1.e de fortalecimiento de capacidades de organizaciones de productores en el eje de Educación y Fortalecimiento de Capacidades.b. Establecer bancos de semilla comunitarios, con la participación de líderes locales, en su mantenimiento y monitoreo.c. Fortalecer la conservación en bancos de semilla comunitarios, mediante la adopción de medidas técnicas y mejoras infraestructurales.d. Incentivar los sistemas locales de semillas a través de ferias de semillas, realización de eventos y días de campo, y socialización de experiencias para facilitar el diálogo e intercambio de semillas entre agricultores y otros actores relevantes.e. Concientizar y capacitar a las poblaciones rurales, incluidas las comunidades indígenas y locales, sobre la importancia de los sistemas locales de semillas para la conservación y uso de RFGAA. 7f. Establecer un sistema de monitoreo para sistemas locales de semillas.• Establecer o fortalecer y armonizar los sistemas nacionales de monitoreo, incluyendo el desarrollo y la implementación de protocolos para identificar y evaluar las tendencias, el impacto de las medidas o intervenciones implementadas sobre los sistemas locales de semillas y el establecimiento, uso y mantenimiento de bancos comunitarios.• Incentivar la colaboración entre todos los actores relevantes para el monitoreo de sistemas locales de semillas.2. Implementación de una nueva arquitectura del sistema de conservación ex situ para optimizar y racionalizar la conservación de los RFGAA mesoamericanos y mejorar su acceso y utilidad para los usuarios Meta: Un sistema regional de conservación ex situ formado por una red de bancos de germoplasma con funciones complementarias, que haga uso eficiente de los recursos disponibles para la conservación y que preste un servicio óptimo a todos los usuarios con inclusión de la agricultura a pequeña escala.Las estrategias para mejorar la conservación ex situ de los RGFAA mesoamericanos responden a la necesidad de adoptar una nueva arquitectura del sistema de conservación y uso de RGFAA en Mesoamérica que potencie las Banco comunitario de semillas, Guatemala M. Ramírez -Bioversity fortalezas de cada uno de los distintos actores involucrados en la conservación ex situ (bancos de germoplasma nacionales y locales, personas naturales, universidades, comunidades locales, entre otros) y promueva la cooperación entre ellos, evitando la duplicación de esfuerzos.La Figura 1 presenta la organización general de la nueva arquitectura y la interconectividad de los diferentes actores.A continuación se muestran las tareas y responsabilidades de los diferentes actores participantes en el componente ex situ del sistema mesoamericano de conservación y uso de los RGFAA.Figura 1. Nueva arquitectura de la conservación ex situ como componente del sistema de conservación y uso de los RFGAA propuestosBancos Institucionales con capacidad de conservación a largo plazo y de Respaldo RegionalBancos Institucionales a Nivel Nacional (bancos nacionales, privados, estaciones experimentales, universidades)• Multiplicación de germoplasma, a fin de aumentar su disponibilidad para los productores, particularmente en tiempos de escasez de semillas, por ejemplo después de desastres naturales. • Conservación a corto plazo de germoplasma ortodoxo local, y a largo plazo de germoplasma con semillas recalcitrantes, mediante colecciones de plantas \"vivas\" en campo.• Asegurar la calidad genética y fitosanitaria del germoplasma conservado mediante una documentación, caracterización y evaluación adecuada con aplicación de los estándares acordados.• Garantizar la conservación a mediano plazo de copias del germoplasma ortodoxo que está siendo usado por los bancos comunitarios.• Poner germoplasma de interés a disposición de los bancos comunitarios y otros usuarios, incluyendo materiales útiles para la producción directa, para la investigación o el fitomejoramiento, proveniente del banco base nacional o de otros bancos mesoamericanos o internacionales.• Asegurar la conservación a largo plazo de germoplasma no-ortodoxo, mediante colecciones de plantas \"vivas\" en campo.• Asegurar el mantenimiento de un duplicado de seguridad (respaldo) depositado en algún otro banco, aunque sea en condición de \"caja negra\".• Donde el contexto lo permite, realizar la multiplicación de germoplasma para su distribución a los productores, particularmente en tiempos de escasez de semilla, así como después de desastres naturales.Bancos institucionales a nivel regional con capacidad de respaldo y de conservación a largo plazo• Conservación a largo plazo de semilla ortodoxa de los cultivos regionalmente importantes (Ej. maíz, frijol, calabazas, chiles, etc.)• Prestar servicio de respaldo a bancos nacionales e internacionales.• Conservación a largo plazo de granos básicos (Ej. maíz, frijol), raíces y tubérculos (Ej. yuca, camote, papa) de importancia para la alimentación mundial.Meta: Sistemas nacionales de conservación ex situ fortalecidos, integrados y vinculados al sistema regional de conservación y uso de RGFAA de Mesoamérica.a. Hacer inventarios y diagnósticos nacionales de:• los actores (bancos de germoplasma, bancos comunitarios, autoridades nacionales competentes, tomadores de decisiones, universidades, escuelas agrícolas y programas de extensión, entre otros);• las capacidades de tales actores de contribuir a la meta;• infraestructura y redes de bancos existentes;• la disponibilidad y accesibilidad de materiales en colecciones de germoplasma ex situ y la cantidad distribuida de estos materiales;• políticas actuales y oportunidades de financiamiento ya existentes;• el estado de las colecciones y costos operativos relacionados con su documentación, caracterización, evaluación, análisis de vacíos, nivel de duplicaciones, representatividad de cultivos y parientes silvestres, entre otros.b. Desarrollar o fortalecer estrategias nacionales de conservación ex situ, aprovechando estructuras existentes, que incluyan la organización y formalización de las conexiones entre los actores relevantes nacionales, y con vista a la integración y conexión al sistema mesoamericano de conservación ex situ, basados en el diagnóstico.c. Identificar o nominar autoridades nacionales competentes para participar en las comisiones nacionales de RFGAA compuestas por expertos de distintas instituciones y sectores y encargarles gestionar la conexión del sistema de bancos nacionales al sistema mesoamericano de conservación ex situ. 8 d. Incorporar la estrategia nacional de conservación ex situ en los ministerios competentes, establecer una ruta con puntos comunes, definir acciones complementarias y coordinadas, y aclarar sus roles respectivos, dentro del marco de desarrollo de una estrategia regional.e. Realizar actividades colaborativas entre actores involucrados en la conservación ex situ, incluidos bancos comunitarios, bancos institucionales, organizaciones de productores, academia, sociedad civil, entre otros.9 Esta actividad se debe implementar considerando A.2.2.b de estandarización y acuerdo de diferentes actividades para la gestión de bancos de germoplasma en Eje Conservación y la estrategia de la nueva arquitectura regional de conservación ex situ.Estas actividades incluirían intercambio, respaldo, evaluación, caracterización, mejoramiento y regeneración del material conservado, estudios ecogeográficos y colectas de germoplasma, entre otras.f. Desarrollar y aplicar guías y estándares acordados a nivel regional para armonizar y mejorar la calidad y accesibilidad de los datos de pasaporte, de caracterización, de evaluación y de regeneración del germoplasma conservado en los bancos institucionales. 9g. Identificar, caracterizar y evaluar especies, variedades y accesiones, en particular las que tengan caracteres de adaptación al cambio climático y garantizar el acceso a éstas.h. Identificar e implementar un sistema de documentación unificado y sostenible, en cuanto actualizaciones y mantenimiento, utilizando sistemas existentes, por ejemplo GRIN-Global.i. Establecer o reforzar bancos comunitarios sostenibles para la conservación ex situ a corto plazo, o reservas de semillas de emergencia en lugares donde sean relevantes y existan vacíos, teniendo como referencia experiencias de países que ya tienen dichos sistemas, en colaboración con extensionistas y considerando las inversiones necesarias para establecer y mantener nuevos bancos.Número de especies observadas, pero no conservadas en bancos de germoplasma De acuerdo con los análisis espaciales, se podrían colectar hasta 73 especies de parientes silvestres por unidad de área que todavía no tienen accesiones conservadas en bancos de germoplasma j. Establecer o mejorar las condiciones para la regeneración, evaluación, multiplicación y distribución de germoplasma en los bancos de conservación ex situ institucionales, complementando el rol de los bancos comunitarios como multiplicadores de materiales y de las empresas locales de semillas. k. Vincular las actividades de evaluación, regeneración y distribución de germoplasma conservado ex situ con las necesidades de programas de fitomejoramiento participativo y convencional, y el uso de herramientas biotecnológicas. l. Asegurar la incorporación de nuevas variedades liberadas en las colecciones ex situ del sistema nacional, en línea con las normas nacionales y respetando los regímenes de propiedad intelectual sobre estas variedades.Meta: La coordinación y la toma de decisiones a nivel regional en relación con la conservación ex situ son oportunas, transparentes, participativas, eficaces y consensuadas por las autoridades competentes de los diferentes países.Actividades a. Estandarizar y acordar a nivel regional las diferentes actividades claves para la buena gestión de los bancos de germoplasma (caracterización, regeneración, evaluación, entre otras) y asegurar su uso a nivel nacional. 10 b. Con el propósito de reducir costos y hacer un uso más eficiente de la infraestructura regional existente para la conservación a mediano y largo plazo, establecer acuerdos entre entidades relevantes dentro y fuera de la región, para una división eficiente y complementaria de tareas de conservación ex situ según la cual los diferentes bancos de la región e internaciones se especializan en ciertos cultivos y actividades (por ejemplo, duplicados de respaldo, caracterización, regeneración, y conservación a corto, mediano y largo plazo).c. Promover y facilitar el acceso y distribución de germoplasma a los usuarios a través del Sistema Multilateral del TIRFAA u otra legislación nacional, regional o internacional pertinente.d. Adoptar un programa regional de colecta de germoplasma, con base en una priorización que surja de los inventarios y diagnósticos nacionales, en consulta con expertos y utilizando herramientas de Sistemas de Información Geográfica (SIG), con énfasis en materiales amenazados o potencialmente adaptados al cambio climático.e. Desarrollar un programa regional para respaldar las colecciones en campo (de especies con semillas recalcitrantes) mediante metodologías como in vitro, crío-conservación, u otras herramientas biotecnológicas.f. Promover, en forma permanente, el conocimiento, la capacitación, y el intercambio de experiencias dentro y entre países, con el fin de estandarizar métodos y fortalecer los sistemas nacionales de conservación ex situ para facilitar su integración a la nueva arquitectura regional.a región mesoamericana incluye numerosos territorios rurales donde todavía persisten altos niveles de hambre, desnutrición y pobreza, a pesar de su gran riqueza en recursos fitogenéticos la que aún no se aprovecha de forma adecuada para atender estas grandes necesidades. Encima de estos problemas, el avance acelerado del cambio climático ya está amenazando la agricultura cada vez más y crea grandes retos para la adaptación de los sistemas productivos.Este PAEM propone aumentar la inversión en el uso de los recursos fitogenéticos porque pueden aportar un gran beneficio directo, particularmente para los sectores rurales de la sociedad, donde los problemas de hambre y pobreza son más agudos. Aumentar la cantidad y calidad de alimentos producidos y su contribución a una dieta saludable depende del uso inteligente y sostenible de los recursos fitogenéticos. También es crucial aumentar la capacidad de adaptación de los sistemas de innovación agrícola y suministro de semillas para enfrentar el cambio climático. Existe amplia evidencia de la rentabilidad de las inversiones en fitomejoramiento para mejorar la producción agrícola, tanto en la región como en el resto del mundo.Se conocen además los beneficios de la diversificación de fincas y de productos. Sembrar distintos cultivos y variedades también ayuda a gestionar riesgos climáticos como la sequía y las lluvias excesivas, cada uno de los cuales afecta los diferentes cultivos y variedades de forma distinta. Para generar más ingresos y mejorar la calidad de vida debe priorizarse la diversificación de productos con valor agregado y fomentar los procesos de transformación y comercialización. Tanto el fitomejoramiento como la diversificación de la producción dependen de la conservación y uso sostenible de los RFGAA.Un problema en la región ha sido la falta de conexión entre la conservación de los RGFAA y el uso de estos recursos. La conservación tiene generalmente menos visibilidad y se da por sentada. El reto ahora es conectar de nuevo la conservación y el uso en un sistema integrado y efectivo de gestión de los RFGAA, donde parte del valor que genera su uso se reinvierta en su conservación para asegurar la sostenibilidad del sistema.Varias iniciativas han creado una capacidad para el mejoramiento genético de los cultivos para la agricultura a pequeña escala, donde el agricultor se involucra de forma activa en la selección de materiales mejor adaptados (fitomejoramiento participativo). También existe experiencia en la producción de semillas de calidad, destinadas a la agricultura en pequeña escala. La región está preparada para invertir más recursos financieros a fin de aumentar el alcance y la efectividad de estas actividades y sacar provecho de ellas para reducir el hambre, la desnutrición y la pobreza. Como parte de esta inversión, es importante mejorar el acceso y la disponibilidad de los recursos fitogenéticos para su uso en sistemas productivos, para la mejora genética de los cultivos, para fomentar la diversificación de fincas y para la diversificación de dietas.1. Disponibilidad de materiales diversos e información sobre su potencial de usoMateriales diversos e información disponible sobre ellos, respondiendo a las necesidades de los diferentes usuarios para lograr una agricultura sostenible en la región.Actividades a. Facilitar el acceso libre de los usuarios a la documentación de las colecciones existentes. b. Establecer colecciones de variedades diversas locales promisorias y promover su uso a través de la multiplicación y la distribución de semillas para responder a las necesidades de seguridad alimentaria, cambio climático, demanda del mercado, entre otros.c. Promover el suministro e intercambio de variedades diversas a nivel local con características de adaptación a las condiciones climáticas cambiantes tanto a través de diferentes eventos, como mediante un mejor uso de las colecciones ex situ existentes. d. Establecer reservas comunitarias y nacionales de semillas diversas para la resiembra post desastre con utilización de variedades adaptadas a las condiciones locales, y en coordinación con actividades de conservación desarrolladas en bancos comunitarios identificadas en la sección de sistemas de semillas en el eje de conservación. e. Mejorar los sistemas de registro de variedades locales, haciéndolos más inclusivos hacia las variedades desarrolladas por agricultores. 11 f. Adecuar el sistema de control de calidad de semillas a la situación de pequeños semilleristas, a través de la adopción de protocolos y mecanismos más apropiados. 12 2. Diversificar fincas introduciendo un mayor número de cultivos como estrategia de gestión de riesgos climáticos con beneficios en cuanto a generación de ingresos, salud y seguridad alimentaria y nutricional.Meta: Las fincas en Mesoamérica producen un número importante de especies comestibles, que benefician de manera directa a los productores, mejoran su dieta y promueven nuevas alternativas de generación de ingresos.a. Documentar el conocimiento local sobre los recursos fitogenéticos, complementarlo con información científica y promover su uso para impulsar una mayor diversificación con uso de prácticas agrícolas sostenibles. 13 b. Establecer una red regional científica sobre especies subutilizadas comestibles, liderada por centros de excelencia, que fomente la investigación en 20 especies de interés regional para aumentar su uso y movilizar recursos de manera coordinada.c. Fomentar la demanda por una mayor diversidad de cultivos o productos agrícolas con valor agregado, por ejemplo establecer y fortalecer cadenas de valor de productos locales y agregar valor a los productos mediante mecanismos como las denominaciones de origen, entre otros.d. Promover una mayor utilización de cultivos y variedades locales nativos en programas existentes de alimentación y de asistencia agrícola (por ejemplo, programas de agricultura familiar y de alimentación escolar). 143. Innovaciones para un mejor aprovechamiento de la diversidad intraespecífica.Esta actividad se debe implementar considerando la actividad D.1.f del eje de educación y fortalecimiento de capacidades, en donde el tema es considerado entre los temas prioritarios de capacitación mencionados.Actividades a. Impulsar el fitomejoramiento con aplicación de métodos participativos, convencionales y moleculares para la creación de variedades locales con características que permitan su adaptación al cambio climático y cumplan las diversas necesidades y preferencias de agricultores y consumidores.b. Identificar y adoptar métodos costo-efectivos para el intercambio, evaluación y adopción por pequeños agricultores de variedades diversas adaptadas a las diferentes condiciones geográficas y climáticas.c. Fortalecer las organizaciones de productores y su capacidad empresarial para la producción y venta de semillas y productos agrícolas, con énfasis en agricultores a pequeña escala y sus variedades locales.d. Crear la capacidad técnica en la región para captar, interpretar e intercambiar datos meteorológicos y facilitar su uso por agricultores, productores de semillas, fitomejoradores y otros actores involucrados en la conservación y uso de RFGAA. 15Tres generaciones de mujeres clasificando maíz, Quilico, Guatemala ste eje busca promover un marco institucional, nacional y regional, que garantice la efectiva implementación de las actividades propuestas en el Plan de Acción y promueva la coordinación entre los diferentes actores y sectores políticos. Es prioritario que la implementación del TIRFAA en cada país sea armónica con otros instrumentos complementarios. Este es un paso fundamental para crear un espacio institucional muy bien articulado en el cual anclar el nuevo sistema de RFGAA.Se proponen también acciones para fomentar interacciones inter-sectoriales que posicionen los RFGAA como elementos estratégicos de intervenciones en el área de la seguridad alimentaria, el desarrollo territorial sostenible y la adaptación al cambio climático. La sección de ITZAMNÁ (http://itzamna-mesoamerica.org) contiene una lista inicial de otros instrumentos, planes y programas nacionales e internacionales que deberán tenerse en cuenta a la hora de desarrollar las acciones descritas en este eje, con la intención de buscar sinergias y complementariedades y potenciar los resultados.Con la intención de facilitar decisiones efectivas que mejoren la conservación y uso de los RFGAA, el eje incluye acciones con miras al fortalecimiento de la capacidad de todos los actores del nuevo sistema de RFGAA mesoamericano, desde los agricultores a los científicos y a las autoridades a nivel nacional y regional. Además del fortalecimiento de capacidades técnicas, se delinean también acciones orientadas a acercar el tema de la conservación y el uso de los RFGAA al público común, a través de una estrategia de comunicación y sensibilización dirigida a amplios sectores de la sociedad, con el fin de conseguir su respaldo y propiciar acciones colectivas.Meta: Las acciones de fortalecimiento de la conservación y uso de los RFGAA descritas en el PAEM son sostenibles en el tiempo, gracias al apoyo de medidas de políticas públicas nacionales y regionales.a. Facilitar la coordinación entre los actores relevantes y los ministerios competentes en conservación, acceso y uso de los RFGAA, para apoyar la ejecución de las actividades colaborativas mencionadas en el PAEM.b. A nivel nacional, establecer o fortalecer la institucionalidad de las comisiones nacionales de RFGAA compuestas por expertos de distintas instituciones y sectores. Vincular sus acciones a las áreas de desarrollo agropecuario, seguridad alimentaria, salud, gestión de riesgos, respuesta a desastres, entre otros, así como a las organizaciones de la sociedad civil y a organizaciones de productores para integrar los RFGAA en estas áreas y facilitar actividades colaborativas. 16 c. Asegurar la participación de las comisiones nacionales de RFGAA en la definición de la posición nacional en negociaciones internacionales pertinentes, tales como las relacionadas con RFGAA, ambiente, propiedad intelectual, tratados de libre comercio y cambio climático.d. Tomar medidas oportunas tanto para aumentar la cobertura de la red meteorológica como para dar acceso libre a datos meteorológicos a escala nacional y regional para su aplicación en actividades de conservación y uso de RFGAA.Esta actividad se debe implementar considerando la actividad A.1.1.h del sub-eje de estrategias para la conservación en finca e in situ a través, por ejemplo, de planes de manejo de territorios bioculturales.18 Esta actividad se debe implementar considerando la actividad A.2.1.c de la estrategia de reestructuración del sistema nacional de conservación ex situ e incentivar de esa manera las actividades colaborativas.Agricultor revisando su cultivo de frijol, Jamastrán, GuatemalaFomentar la coordinación efectiva entre entidades encargadas de la meteorología y el cambio climático y las del sistema de RFGAA, reforzando las iniciativas existentes.a. Integrar el tema de RFGAA y el concepto de territorios bioculturales en políticas y planes de manejo de biodiversidad y áreas protegidas, en políticas, estrategias y planes de adaptación de los ecosistemas y la biodiversidad al cambio climático a nivel nacional y regional (Ej. el Corredor Biológico Mesoamericano), o internacional (Ej. la Iniciativa Satoyama), tal que se vea reflejado en los planes operativos y en los presupuestos.b. A nivel nacional, incorporar el tema RFGAA y el concepto de territorios bioculturales (por ejemplo, identificación de zonas de alta diversidad de cultivos), en procesos existentes de planificación/ordenamiento territorial, que se vea reflejado en los planes operativos y en los presupuestos.c. Vincular la conservación en finca de los RFGAA y el manejo de territorios bioculturales a iniciativas, movimientos y programas de agricultura ecológica y sostenible. 17a. Institucionalizar la nueva estructura de conservación ex situ, designando oficialmente las competencias de todos los actores relevantes a nivel nacional, incluidos los ministerios competentes, y estableciendo el modus operandi de sus interacciones con otros actores en la región, e internacionales. 18 Esta actividad se debe implementar considerando la actividad B.2.a del eje de uso sostenible y estrategia de diversificación en donde se aborda la documentación del conocimiento y su uso apropiado.b. Proveer apoyo institucional a los bancos comunitarios de semillas, por ejemplo a través de su inclusión en políticas y planes locales de adaptación al cambio climático y la seguridad alimentaria.c. Articular e implementar mecanismos efectivos y ágiles para atender las solicitudes y proveer acceso a germoplasma conservado en los bancos nacionales y donde sea relevante según las prescripciones del TIRFAA u otros mecanismos mutuamente acordados.d. Establecer en el reglamento de registro de semillas el requisito de depositar una muestra de semillas de nuevas variedades liberadas en el país, en el sistema nacional de conservación ex situ respetando los derechos y la legislación en materia de propiedad intelectual frente a la distribución.1.4. Políticas de apoyo al uso sostenible a. Integrar el tema de RFGAA en políticas y presupuestos de desarrollo agropecuario y agricultura ecológica u orgánica para aumentar las inversiones en programas de mejoramiento genético, diversificación de la producción y establecimiento de cadenas de valor basadas en agrobiodiversidad. 19 b. Establecer programas conjuntos entre entidades públicas y privadas para dar valor agregado y promover el uso de alimentos basados en RFGAA locales (por ejemplo denominaciones de origen, ferias gastronómicas regionales, agroturismo, turismo gastronómico, productos orgánicos y naturales).c. Integrar el tema de RFGAA en políticas y presupuestos de seguridad alimentaria o agricultura familiar, educación y salud, para promover el uso de RFGAA locales como alternativa saludable y nutritiva para la alimentación de la población, con especial énfasis en grupos vulnerables (por ejemplo a través de programas de desayunos escolares, provisión de alimentos a sectores de la población de escasos recursos, a grupos de madres cabezas de familia.d. A nivel nacional, establecer mecanismos de gestión integral del riesgo que incluyan medidas para crear y mantener reservas comunitarias y nacionales de semillas que contribuyan a la seguridad alimentaria y a la respuesta a desastres frente al cambio climático, con prioridad para las RFGAA locales.e. Institucionalizar sistemas descentralizados de multiplicación y difusión de materiales locales, diversos y localmente adaptados, incluso a través de iniciativas que apoyen el desarrollo empresarial, para reducir la dependencia externa a semillas y alimentos, y aumentar la resiliencia al cambio climático de los sistemas de producción, tomando como ejemplo iniciativas existentes como el proyecto regional Semillas para el Desarrollo y el programa colaborativo de fitomejoramiento participativo en Mesoamérica. b. Realizar actividades de coordinación a nivel nacional para la efectiva implementación del TIRFAA en armonía con el CDB y en su caso con el Protocolo de Nagoya, tanto en lo institucional como en los marcos jurídicos.Meta: Los derechos del agricultor son reconocidos y las medidas para su promoción son incluidas en instrumentos normativos, administrativos y de política a nivel nacional.a. Identificar marcos legales, administrativos y de política específicos al reconocimiento y protección de los derechos del agricultor, dentro del diagnóstico que se lleve a cabo para la implementación del Tratado.b. Implementar en los diferentes países de la región normas o medidas necesarias para el mantenimiento del conocimiento tradicional asociado con los RFGAA y su protección, de acuerdo con compromisos internacionales. 20 c. Revisar la legislación nacional existente y armonizar a nivel regional las normas o medidas nacionales establecidas para reconocer los registros o inventarios de variedades criollas o las generadas a través del fitomejoramiento participativo. 21 d. Reconocer los sistemas locales de semillas en las leyes de semillas nacionales, a través de mecanismos alternativos de registro y certificación de calidad, la facilitación de la legalización y el registro de empresas o cooperativas y el acceso a semillas de calidad por parte del agricultor a pequeña escala.e. Desarrollar mecanismos para garantizar el derecho de las comunidades que practican agricultura tradicional o a pequeña escala, a participar en actividades y toma de decisiones a diferentes escalas relacionadas con RFGAA, por ejemplo a través del fortalecimiento de las organizaciones de productores.f. Promover la distribución justa y equitativa de los beneficios derivados del uso de conocimientos tradicionales asociados a los RFGAA en línea con el Protocolo de Nagoya y otros acuerdos internacionales relevantes.g. Crear e incluir incentivos que mejoren la conservación y el uso de los RFGAA cultivados y silvestres, sobre todo por pequeños agricultores, comunidades indígenas y locales y con la participación de la sociedad civil, por ejemplo mediante programas de fitomejoramiento participativo, pagos por servicios de conservación de la biodiversidad agrícola, acceso facilitado a mercados, inclusión en cadenas de valor justas para nuevos productos, establecimiento de denominaciones de origen nacional o regional, entre otros.Agricultor preparando el suelo para la siembra de maíz, Alauca, Honduras n este eje se reconoce la gran necesidad de fortalecer y/o desarrollar recursos humanos y las capacidades nacionales para poder llevar a cabo las acciones del PAEM. Las necesidades varían desde la actualización y reemplazo generacional de profesionales activos en RFGAA, la formación de nuevas generaciones de proveedores de servicios similares a los de extensión pero con un mandato más amplio hasta el fortalecimiento de las organizaciones de agricultores para que hagan un mejor uso de la información para enfrentar el cambio climático mediante el uso de los RFGAA, hasta la capacitación de tomadores de decisiones a múltiples niveles para su participación informada en la implementación de los compromisos internacionales relevantes a los RFGAA. Si se aprovecha coordinadamente la oferta existente de educación y capacitación, actualmente dispersa en instituciones en los países de la región, existen buenas probabilidades de responder a esta urgente demanda.E 1. Estrategia de educación y fortalecimiento de capacidadesMeta: Actores nacionales relevantes en el área de RFGAA tienen los conocimientos, habilidades y actitudes necesarios para sostener y fomentar un sistema mesoamericano integrado de conservación y uso de los RFGAA.Actividades a. Incluir el tema de RFGAA en la educación universitaria y profesional de Mesoamérica de manera más prominente:• Promoviendo enfoques interdisciplinarios;• Respondiendo a la demanda del mercado laboral por profesionales en esta área;• Aspirando a la creación de un programa educativo regional desde el nivel primario al universitario sobre los RFGAA, su conservación y uso sostenible;• Aumentando la designación de becas al tema de conservación y uso de RFGAA, aprovechando los programas existentes.b. Tomar ventaja de las iniciativas colaborativas, intensificar las colaboraciones entre universidades e instituciones afines al tema de RFGAA a través de investigaciones que incluyan la elaboración de tesis de pregrado y posgrado, y prácticas profesionales.c. Fortalecer las capacidades de las organizaciones de agricultores a pequeña escala para que se empoderen e interactúen con el sistema formal de RFGAA de la región. 22 d. Formar la nueva generación de fitomejoradores y extensionistas que tengan la capacidad de gestionar la creación de capacidades y liderar la creación de plataformas multiactores.e. Desarrollar un programa de capacitación para tomadores de decisiones a nivel local, nacional y regional, sobre la implementación de acuerdos internacionales relevantes para RFGAA.f. Establecer un consorcio de instituciones para desarrollar un programa de fortalecimiento de capacidades en el tema de RFGAA en la región, que incluiría instituciones con fortalezas comparativas o el mandato respectivo como CATIE, la Escuela Agrícola Panamericana Zamorano, Earth University, Centros del CGIAR, Banco Nacional de Germoplasma de México, entre muchos otros. Este consorcio se encargaría de:• Establecer un repositorio central de materiales y oportunidades de capacitación en temas de RFGAA disponibles, integrándolo en la página web gestionada por el secretariado;22 Esta actividad se debe implementar considerando la actividad A.1.2.e de la estrategia de reconocimiento de sistemas locales de semillas.Eje educación y fortalecimiento de capacidades Muestras de frijol, banco de germoplasma del CIAT N. Palmer -CIAT• Basado en la demanda existente, diseñar o ejecutar cursos cortos, incluso en línea y de aprendizaje autónomo, aprovechando materiales ya desarrollados y la experiencia de centros nacionales e internacionales en temas prioritarios de capacitación.-Temas prioritarios para profesionales pueden ser: técnicas de conservación ex situ, manejo de bases de datos, uso de sistemas de información geográfica identificación de germoplasma con caracteres de adaptación a cambio climático, gestión de la conservación in situ y en finca y herramientas para el análisis y manejo de datos de biodiversidad. 23Meta: El PAEM se ejecuta de manera transparente, participativa, eficaz y consensuada a nivel regional y las instancias nacionales y regionales lo usan como herramienta clave en la formulación de políticas y planes de seguridad alimentaria y nutricional, adaptación al cambio climático y desarrollo rural.Actividades a. Establecer el marco de articulación para la ejecución del PAEM formado por las secretarías ejecutivas de organismos regionales relevantes, entre otros CAC, CCAD, COMIECO, COMISCA; donantes y representantes de otros países relevantes en la región que no son parte de estos organismos.b. Establecer el mecanismo de coordinación regional para la implementación del PAEM a través de los grupos técnicos del CAC, en particular SICTA y el Grupo Técnico sobre Cambio Climático y Gestión integrada del Riesgo.c. Dentro del SICTA, fortalecer y asignar recursos a la Red Mesoamericana de Recursos Fitogenéticos (REMERFI), para que funcione como secretariado ejecutivo técnico del PAEM. Entre las funciones del secretariado figuran:• Asegurar el diálogo con entidades regionales y nacionales, en particular con las comisiones nacionales de RFGAA. Como fue reconocido por muchos de los asistentes a las consultas de formulación del PAEM, REMERFI tiene el desafío y la valiosa oportunidad de tomar un rol protagónico en la implementación del Plan de Acción Estratégico. Como tema inmediato es necesario llegar hasta la comunidad de usuarios, como fitomejoradores, agricultores y otros para que realmente los recursos fitogenéticos beneficien a todos, articulando conservación con desarrollo que responda a las prioridades de un amplio espectro de actores y decisores. REMERFI también puede aprovechar esta circunstancia para alimentar y desarrollar los mecanismos que permitan asegurar un apoyo gubernamental significativo a los recursos fitogenéticos.Existen también oportunidades de colaboración interredes, poco desarrollada hasta ahora. Por ejemplo, si se aprovechan los programas nacionales fuertes que forman parte de NORGEN (Canadá, USA, México) y de TROPIGEN y REGENSUR (Ramírez, 2008).• Establecer y proponer al CAC la agenda regional de trabajo anual para la ejecución del PAEM.• Monitorear la implementación del PAEM en los diferentes países.• Apoyar que las acciones implementadas bajo el PAEM estén en línea con otros instrumentos regionales e internacionales, en particular el Segundo Plan de Acción Mundial para los Recursos Fitogenéticos para la alimentación y la agricultura.• Comunicar los avances y los resultados de la implementación del PAEM.• Facilitar la disponibilidad y la difusión de información relacionada con la conservación, uso y políticas del RFGAA y relevantes para la implementación del PAEM, incluso a través de la gestión de una página web dedicada.• Coordinar la formulación de proyectos regionales en línea con las acciones del PAEM.• Movilizar y gestionar recursos financieros para la implementación del PAEM en línea con lo mencionado en el eje de financiación.N. Palmer, CIAT.Preparación de tortillas con harina de maíz, El Salvador Meta: Las actividades previstas cuentan con un plan de financiamiento que permita su ejecución en los próximos diez años y que conduce a la sostenibilidad financiera del sistema mesoamericano de RFGAA.a. Elaborar un estudio de costos y beneficios de las actividades mencionadas en este PAEM, incluyendo una estrategia de distribución de los costos a lo largo de los diez años de implementación.b. Identificar posibles mecanismos de financiación para áreas temáticas o conjuntos de acciones identificadas dentro de este PAEM. Entre los posibles mecanismos a considerar están:• Impuestos nacionales a productos y servicios, iniciativas innovadoras de financiación, como por ejemplo movilización de fondos a través de los programas de responsabilidad social corporativa, pagos por servicios ambientales.• Reinversión de beneficios generados por la utilización de los recursos genéticos de los RFGAA regionales, como es definido en el Protocolo de Nagoya, y en armonía con el TIRFAA.N. Palmer -CIAT Terreno listo para siembra, Honduras c. Asegurar la disponibilidad de fondos específicos para RFGAA en los presupuestos nacionales y locales, entre otros, para el buen funcionamiento de la comisión nacional de RFGAA y los bancos de germoplasma bajo responsabilidad nacional o local.d. Establecer un fondo común regional que apoye acciones regionales dentro de la reestructuración del sistema de RFGAA y que financie:• El mantenimiento de colecciones ex situ a las cuales tienen acceso facilitado todos los usuarios regionales o internacionales, en armonía con los compromisos internacionales adquiridos.• La coordinación regional de actividades e intercambio de experiencias mencionadas en este PAEM.• Otras actividades relacionadas con la conservación y uso de los RFGAA, acordadas consensualmente por todos los países contribuyentes.e. Establecer una unidad estratégica de movilización de recursos financieros dentro del secretariado, que estará encargada de mantener proactivamente relaciones con donantes internacionales (GEF, PNUD, PNUMA, CO-SUDE, GIZ, BID, Banco Mundial), hacer seguimiento a convocatorias y coordinar la elaboración y aplicación de propuestas de proyectos, entre otras.Agrobiodiversidad: Incluye todos los componentes de la diversidad biológica pertinentes para la producción agrícola, incluida la producción de alimentos, el sustento de los medios de vida y la conservación del hábitat de los ecosistemas agrícolas (CIP-UPWARD, 2003).Bancos comunitarios de semilla: Son colecciones de semillas conservadas y administradas por comunidades locales. Estos bancos son creados con el fin de asegurar material de siembra para la próxima[s] temporada[s] y la disponibilidad de material genérico en caso de pérdida de variedades (Almekinders, 2001). A menudo son utilizados para la conservación a corto plazo, contribuyendo a la conservación in situ, los sistemas locales de semillas y como almacén de semilla local para respuesta a los desastres naturales.Banco de germoplasma: Centro para la conservación de los recursos genéticos en condiciones que permiten prolongarles la vida (Rao et al. 2007).Biodiversidad: Variabilidad de organismos vivos de cualquier fuente, incluidos, entre otras cosas, los ecosistemas terrestres y marinos y otros ecosistemas acuáticos y los complejos ecológicos de los que forman parte; comprende la diversidad dentro de cada especie, entre las especies y de los ecosistemas (CBD, 1992).Cadenas de valor: Estas describen un amplio rango de actividades en las cuales se requiere tener un producto o servicio que pase a través de diferentes fases de producción (combinación de transformación física y adición de varios servicios de producción), incluida la entrega a consumidores finales y su desecho (Kaplinsky y Morris, 2001).Conocimientos tradicionales: Son los conocimientos, innovaciones y prácticas de las comunidades indígenas y locales que entrañen estilos tradicionales de vida pertinentes para la conservación y la utilización sostenible de la diversidad biológica (CBD, 1992).Conservación en finca: Conservación in situ de las plantas cultivadas.Conservación ex situ: Conservación de la diversidad biológica fuera de su hábitat natural en el caso de los recursos fitogenéticos, puede ser en bancos de semillas, en bancos de germoplasma in vitro o como colecciones vivas en bancos de germoplasma en el campo. (Rao et al. 2007).Conservación in situ: Conservación de los ecosistemas y los hábitats naturales y el mantenimiento y recuperación de poblaciones viables de especies en sus entornos naturales y, en el caso de las especies domesticadas y cultivadas, en los entornos en que hayan desarrollado sus propiedades específicas (TIRFAA, 2009).Fitomejoramiento participativo: Es la aplicación de metodologías de mejora genética, con involucramiento y participación activa del agricultor en todo el proceso de innovación tecnológica (FAO, 2011).Germoplasma: Material de reproducción o propagación vegetativa de las plantas (FAO, 1994).Material genético: Todo material de origen vegetal, animal, microbiano o de otro tipo que contenga unidades funcionales de la herencia (CBD, 1992).Recursos Fitogenéticos para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (RFGAA): Cualquier material genético de origen vegetal de valor real o potencial para la alimentación y la agricultura (TIRFAA, 2009).Resiliencia: Capacidad de un organismo, ecosistema o comunidad de recuperarse tras fenómenos de perturbación importantes (Thompson, 2011).Semillas ortodoxas: Son aquellas que pueden permanecer viables en condiciones controladas de almacenamiento (Roberts, 1973).Semillas recalcitrantes: Son aquellas que no pueden ser almacenadas porque pierden rápidamente su viabilidad cuando son deshidratadas y mantenidas a bajas temperaturas (Roberts, 1973).Sistema Multilateral del TIRFAA: Es un sistema que permite el intercambio entre Partes Contratantes de diversidad genética y la información asociada a esta que se encuentren en sus bancos de germoplasma, además asegura la distribución justa y equitativa de los beneficios obtenidos del uso de dicho material (TIRFAA, 2013).Territorios bioculturales: El concepto de territorio biocultural fue elaborado en armonía con la definición de \"paisajes socio-ecológicos productivos\" de la Iniciativa Satoyama (2010), donde los definen como mosaicos de hábitats y usos de suelo dinámicos que han sido formados a través del tiempo, gracias a la interacción entre los humanos y la naturaleza manteniendo su biodiversidad y proveyendo a los humanos de bienes y servicios necesarios para su bienestar.Tratado Internacional de RFGAA (TIRFAA): Único instrumento multilateral que regula la conservación y el uso sostenible de los recursos fitogenéticos para la alimentación y la agricultura.Variedad: Agrupación de plantas dentro de un taxón botánico único del rango más bajo conocido, que se define por la expresión reproducible de sus características distintivas y otras de carácter genético (TIRFAA, 2009). Dependiendo del contexto, puede referirse a razas y variedades \"criollas\" o locales, así como a variedades mejoradas, híbridas, y comerciales. ","tokenCount":"13128"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1729733422.json b/data/part_2/1729733422.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..15a97a1e0954ee83a03a81025c99622921cb78bb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1729733422.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"64b8256162575eca921eecafca5e4d4f","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/d00617da-e708-48b3-bbac-b95863f92bcc/retrieve","id":"-564730025"},"keywords":["COVID-19","seed security","poverty","seed systems"],"sieverID":"a2c5aab1-058d-433a-89fc-f5002d72032c","pagecount":"4","content":"Food security and seed security are closely linked, especially for poor smallholders in developing countries. The impacts of COVID-19 highlight the vulnerability of marginalized groups, and their exposure across multiple social and economic dimensions. Employing seed interventions as part of the COVID-19 recovery requires recognizing local social dynamics, or risks worsening the situation for the most disadvantaged.A great deal of COVID-19 related discussion addresses the stability of the global food system in continuing to feed the world. With global commodity stocks high and relatively modest disruptions to date in international trade, concern is refocusing on maintaining food production and processing value chains (e.g. Barrett, 2020). But how do things play out at the local and individual level for smallholder farmers?For the poor, COVID-19 only adds to a long list of uncertainties. Society's poorest are the least food secure, subject to high vulnerability and low resilience to shocks, as has been described in relation to the interacting factors of climate change (e.g. Almekinders et al., 2010;Kaijser and Kronsell, 2014). The concept of intersectionality highlights how the poorest are usually disadvantaged across a number of interacting social dimensions, subjecting them to different mechanisms of marginalization and clusters of interlocking disadvantages (Cleaver, 2005). Poor smallholders farm on marginal agricultural land where livelihoods are most severely affected by extreme weather, pests and diseases, shifts in markets, and natural or man-made disasters. By their nature, smallholders have limited access to resources and capital to withstand hardships, endure losses, or to adopt coping and mitigation practices.When considering the food security of poor smallholder farmers, seed security is a particular concern (McGuire and Sperling, 2011). For a large number of developing country smallholders, across the majority of food crops, saving one's own seed remains by far the most common sourcing practice, especially in the case of June 2020Food Chain Vol. 9 No. 2 self-pollinating crops like beans, rice, wheat, and vegetatively propagated ones like potato (e.g. Kansiime and Mastenbroek, 2016;McGuire and Sperling, 2016;Tadesse et al., 2016). On the surface, self-supply seems a resilient, self-reliant practice appropriate for poor or remote settings. It also seems technically straightforward: one can set aside and save a part of the harvest for next planting since for many crops the planting material is the same as the harvested grains, tubers or roots. However, this also increases the risk of seed being eaten or sold during periods of household food deficit or cash needs. This is exactly why many of the poorest farmers are seed insecure, and frequently need to source seed at planting time (e.g. McGuire and Sperling, 2016). Poor farmers often end up looking to buy whatever seed is available from small traders or local markets, risking getting stuck with low-quality seed, or relying on seed obtained from their social network, e.g. family or neighbours (e.g. Tadesse et al., 2016). Although a social network functions as a safety net, it is likewise a network of obligations (Cleaver, 2005;Pircher et al., 2013), a phenomenon that is also noted for seed systems (Coomes et al., 2015). Seed that is given often comes with expectations of providing labour in the future, or running errands in the time to come (McGuire, 2007;Tadesse et al., 2016).These aspects of seed security are consequential for a huge number of farmers.Out of a conservative global estimate of 570 million farms, 90 per cent are estimated to be family farms (primary reliance on family labour), and 85 per cent are smaller than 2 hectares in area (Lowder et al., 2016). An estimated 90 per cent of all seed supply takes place through informal channels (McGuire and Sperling, 2016). Poor smallholder households often face insufficient harvests to meet both household food and cash needs, and adopt livelihood strategies depending heavily on supplemental income from off-farm sources such as seasonal migrant work, day labour, and remittances -all at risk of interruption by policies implemented to curb the spread of COVID-19. COVID-19 quarantine policies have also exposed the frequent mismatch between social networks of rural households and administrative divisions. Quarantine measures are imposed on the basis of administrative boundariesstructures that are political in nature and often divide informal social networks that are important for labour, income, and food and seed security.Some clonally propagated crops may have a seed security advantage because the part of the plant that is used for seed is different from the part which is harvested for food. For example, cassava, sweet potato, and banana are propagated by stem cuttings, vines, and suckers, respectively, decoupling food production and seed supply. These crops may also make outsize contributions to local food security if their bulkiness and perishability keep them around in the production area. Evaluating the impacts of the COVID-19 quarantines on seed systems may also provide researchers with natural experiments. For example, strict plant material movement quarantines are often suggested to control crop diseases such as Sri Lanka Cassava Mosaic Disease (South-east Asia), Maize Lethal Necrosis (East Africa), and Fusarium wilt of banana (Latin America). COVID-19 border closures may provide a chance for researchers to evaluate the real effects of interrupting seed movement. Border closures also threaten formal seed supply by restricting inspection travel of seed certification officers and the movement of quality seed (FSC, 2020;OECD, 2020;SeedSystem.org, 2020). These interruptions to the formal sector may be very visible to researchers and policymakers, but how they affect seed access and use by different segments of the farming population using seed from formal and informal sources is unknown.Interventions in response to COVID-19, whether to bolster seed security or otherwise support the livelihoods of the poorest, risk missing the appropriate entry points and effects if they do not consider the totality of social differentiation and dynamics at the community level. Initiatives may connect with farmers who turn out to be part of a local elite, and use different seeds and inputs than the poorest (Pircher et al., 2013;Tadesse et al., 2016;De Roo et al., 2019). They may also not take into account local social networks and norms and values, eventually helping out the poorest but in other ways than perceived 'right' (Pircher et al., 2013, Shapland et al., in preparation). Insufficiently responsive interventions risk not only failing to be effective, but may in fact worsen participants' situations by exacerbating existing structural inequalities.While COVID-19 has only recently become a global phenomenon, the target beneficiaries of relief projects were already living with a list of socioeconomic disadvantages and perpetual food insecurity. For the poorest the adage is often true: when it rains, it pours.","tokenCount":"1079"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1736138913.json b/data/part_2/1736138913.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fd24463ed788609afaa33236e2084b9a0981fd2b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1736138913.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"1decd3da3478e0effe60ffcf5931cd4e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/2f87d20e-f5bf-4231-986d-f9c5cd3284b4/retrieve","id":"-1793205126"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"5b2f1c0c-96e4-4383-bea3-ebd655986878","pagecount":"26","content":"Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Co-operation) was established in 1983 under the Convention between the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) States and the European Union (EU) Member States.tasks are to develop and provide services that improve access to information for agricultural and rural development , and to strengthen the capacity of ACP countries to produce, acquire, exchange and utilize information in these areas. CTA's programmes are organized around three principal themes: strengthening ACP information capabilities, promoting contact and exchange of information among partner organizations, and providing information on demand.OAU-IBAR (The Inter-African Bureau for Animal Resources of the Organization of African Unity) is a regional institute which operates within the organisation of African Unity. mandate is to control major epidemic diseases through regional projects, to support strategic research for livestock development, to establish documentation and information centres and to initiate policy reforms for the Livestock Sector in Africa.in the CGIAR system, ISNAR is the only one that focuses specifically on institutional development within national agricultural research systems.ISNAR assists developing countries in bringing about lasting improvements in the performance of their national agricultural research systems and organizations. It does this by promoting appropriate agricultural research policies, sustainable research institutions, and improved research management.services to national research are ultimately intended to benefit producers and consumers in developing countries and to safeguard the natural environment for future generations.Dr Christian Hoste was the scientific and technical adviser for the two seminars on livestock policies sub-Saharan Africa, the conclusions and recommendations of which served as a basis for the preparation of this publication. Dr C. Hoste prepared this document when he was senior scientist at ISNAR. OnAugust 1998 he was assigned to the NARS Secretariat under GFAR (Global Forum on Agricultural Research).Poverty alleviation, food security, and sustainable natural resources management are at the heart of the research and development efforts of most developing countries. Livestock production contributes significantly to the first two objectives as this makes an essential contribution to the livelihoods of populations in poorer countries. Unfortunately, livestock production is often perceived as having a detrimental effect on the environment. This is especially important in sub-Saharan Africa with its extensive marginal land and marked climatic instability.In recent years, several international conferences have attempted to demonstrate that animal production can be expanded significantly without incurring negative effects on the environment. The scientific and technical constraints have received much attention, whereas limited concern has been focussed on the policies and strategies needed to promote livestock development whilst preserving natural resources.In this context, CTA decided to establish a task force to bring together a sub-Saharan Africa consultation on livestock development policies. This task force was composed of representatives of EU Commission and XII), ISNAR and a small group of other livestock specialists. One of the recommendations was to organise two separate seminars: one for the humid and sub-humid zones of West and Central Africa and one for Eastern and Southern Africa. The first seminar dealt with 18 countries of West and Central Africa and took place in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, 5-9 February 1996. The second seminar was attended by representatives of 22 countries and took place in Mbabane, Swaziland, 28 July -1 August 1997. This seminar was scheduled immediately before an OAU meeting of the Ministers responsible for animal resources also organised in Mbabane, Swaziland.The seminars highlighted the lack or weaknesses of livestock policies as a major constraint to development. The highest priority was given to building capacity to develop appropriate policies, to formulate strategies and to evaluate their impacts. These seminars led to the formulation of specific recommendations which were translated into resolutions taken by the OAU Ministers responsible for animal resources. National, regional and international resources have to be pulled together to provide the enabling environment for the livestock sector to fulfil the needs and expectations of both the producers and the consumers. These seminars provided a solid foundation for such a transformation.The hospitality of the hosting countries authorities, the valuable inputs of the IBAR, and the contribution of all the participants, are warmly appreciated. We also thank the EU Commission and XII) and ISNAR for their support in the design and organisation of the meetings. Special thanks are due to Dr Christian Hoste for his contribution in bringing this synthesis report together.Director CTAIn sub-Saharan Africa probably more than in any other part of the world, the livestock sector is integral to the livelihood of the populations. It contributes significantly not only to food security and the nutritional quality of the diet but also to national economies. In addition, the demand for livestock products is increasing very rapidly in this region owing to a combination of population growth, rising incomes and urbanization.The formulation of policies and the implementation of strategies designed to meet these challenges is essential. Such policies and strategies should take into account all political, socio-economic, scientific and technical factors and pay special attention to the various interactions between livestock and natural resources management, wildlife and agricultural systems. These seminars were also organized to contribute to the current debate on strategies for agricultural and rural development. The most important and recent international forums which have dealt with these issues have been the World Food Summit (FAO, November the international conference on Livestock and the Environment en, June the 8th Global Biodiversity Forum (Montreal, August and the ongoing talks between ACP and EU member states on the follow-up of the Lomé IV Convention.Both seminars were scheduled to precede important meetings of policy-makers. The first seminar was scheduled just before a Conference of the West and Central African Ministers of Agriculture (Yaoundé, Cameroon, February 1996). Similarly, the second seminar took place just the week before the Fifth OAU Conference of Ministers Responsible for Animal Resources (Mbabane, Swaziland, August 1997). This timing allowed the conclusions and policy recommendations for an environment more conducive to livestock development to be immediately submitted, discussed and endorsed by the highest authorities concerned. As it will be noted from Part V, Decisions, this strategy has proved to be very useful.The overall objective of these seminars was to contribute to the ongoing debate on policies aimed at promoting effective, efficient and sustainable livestock development in developing countries while at the same time managing natural resources.The two seminars had basically the same three specific objectives:To build consensus views at both national and regional levels on the utilization of natural resources, economic and social policies and the institutional environment, in order to ensure livestock development on an effective, efficient and sustainable basis;To identify themes on which additional knowledge is required in order to facilitate the formulation of livestock development policies;To make policy-makers aware of the most important factors to be considered in formulating livestock development policies.The seminar for West and Central Africa lasted four and a half days and was structured around three themes: Economic and political environment; Technical environment; and Institutional environment. Keynote papers were prepared for each of these themes following guidelines suggested by the organizers, and were presented in plenary sessions. A full day and a half was devoted to discussions in working groups constituted around these three themes and to the presentation of their results. Country representatives prepared and presented posters illustrating the livestock development activities and policies existing in their respective countries.The seminar for East and Southern Africa kept to the same duration and the same time for working groups but structured the latter around five different technical themes: 1.Market orientation (livestock and livestock products); Livestock, environment and wildlife (extensive production systems); Crop-livestock interactions (intensive production systems); Animal health and genetic resources constraints; and Each group had to review for its theme the following six aspects: research and development needs; information needs; human resources needs; respective roles of the private and public sector; v) vi) national and regional perspectives.In addition, instead of preparing posters, country representatives were requested to prepare a country report addressing a few specific questions in a suggested format allowing for the preparation in advance of a synthesis which was presented during the seminar.institutional changes needed (organization and management); andProceedings of both seminars have been published by the CTA' and contain the keynote presentations, summaries of the general discussions, and the results of the working groups. Presented here is a summary of the main issues and conclusions which were raised by the participants at the two seminars. Sub-regional distinctions are no longer made as many commonalities can be found at the policy level, in spite of significant differences at the organizational, scientific, technical and managerial levels.The participants at both seminars expressed their serious concern about the overall decline in agricultural sector in sub-Saharan Africa often resulting from what and Dale called in Mbabane discredited policies and institutions. It was also acknowledged that livestock policies could not be studied in isolation as they are strongly influenced by other policies related to agriculture, the environment and natural resource management (including wildlife), land tenure, marketing and trade, transport, human resource development and institutional capacity-building, public health and food processing, and regional and international co-operation.As a consequence, the participants considered as a top priority the review of all existing agriculture-related policies in order to highlight and correct those which are inappropriate or which have a negative effect on agriculture and its livestock sub-sector. These include, for example, subsidies, taxation on agricultural inputs, price controls that favour consumers, unsustainable services such as free dipping, total reliance on importation in livestock and livestock products, and communal land ownership. Among these \"counter-productive'' policies, land-tenure policies were identified as probably the biggest constraint as they could inhibit human and financial investment in the livestock sub-sector. At the same time, specific policies have to be formulated and put in force to encourage animal production per se and to provide an enabling environment at the national, regional and international levels: Critical issues to be addressed at production level are: increasing productivity (through improved supply of inputs, animal health services, infrastructure, etc.) to create a sustainable marketable surplus; improving product quality (through extension, market information, etc.); and empowering the negotiation capacity of producers (through the creation or strengthening of farmers' associations, co-operatives, etc.) to guarantee them a fair price.Main issues to be addressed by national policies are related to: marketing infrastructure; market information; financing arrangements; grades and standards; and processing.At regional and international levels, the basic objective of the policies to be formulated is to address hindrances to trade and to adhere to rules of regional and international trade.The participants also mentioned that policy formulation and planning is usually done in the Ministry of Finance or Ministry of Planning and they came to the conclusion that there is a need for close association with such ministries in the agriculture policy-formulation process.The participants realized that very few sub-Saharan countries have clear, detailed and coherent livestock development and research policies. In fact, for most countries, livestock development policies are mentioned only in the general agriculture sectoral policy document; very few specific national livestock policy documents exist. This lacuna is even more evident for livestock research policies: national agricultural research plans are scarcer than national development policy documents and, where they do exist, the livestock sub-sector is usually under estimated.The participants recognized that there was an inevitable shift of responsibility for livestock research and development from the public to the private sector. However, they were concerned that the transfer of functions from the State to the private sector is not being done gradually and smoothly. This was explained by several factors, among which is an inadequate legal framework to deal with new trends in the livestock sector. It is fully recognized that the private sector will take over only when an enabling policy environment (i.e. one which addresses institutional arrangements, financial capacity and economic feasibility) is in place. Finally, the participants clearly noted that many areas in the livestock sector may still not fully support private enterprises (e.g. animal health services or extension services) or must remain under government responsibility (e.g. quality of animal health services, public health, disease control, food quality control).There is a serious lack of national expertise and reliable livestock information in Saharan African countries that is needed to support the requisite livestock policy analysis and formulation. The livestock industry should train more livestock economists, environmental economists, production systems analysts and business engineersand both the public and the private sectors have a role to play in this. The need to take into account the non-monetary value of livestock activities in all economic analyses was also underlined as an additional livestock-specific difficulty. Another consensus which emerged, on human resources, was the need to adjust the curricula of veterinary schools to make them more responsive to the emerging challenges and to standardize and harmonize them in order to facilitate technical regional co-operation.The other major condition identified for formulating sound policies was building or strengthening capacity in information management and communication, as almost all countries are suffering from a deficit of information and from poor communication systems. The top priorities identified are to establish market (national and regional) information systems, to disseminate new or improved technologies, especially those related to processing and preserving animal products, and, in more general terms, to establish an inventory of livestock resources, production and utilization.It was agreed that research has a key role to play, but of particular concern are the heavy dependence of the national research programmes on donor funding (and the long-term unsustainability of this mechanism) and the shrinking of funding per scientist. The participants identified the need to develop research policies consistent with agricultural and livestock development policies and to re-examine seriously all organizational, managerial and programmatic aspects of national agricultural research institutions. They specifically suggested that consideration should be given to adding a policy research dimension to their programmes. They also reaffirmed national responsibilities in setting out research priorities in the newly emerging global system and the consequent need to improve co-ordination of their research efforts at the sub-regional and regional levels. Regional research organizations or associations such as ASARECA, CORAF and SACCAR and the newly-established FARA have a key role to play in co-ordinating livestock research in sub-Saharan Africa and deserve stronger support from national governments as well as from the international community.On the issue of institutional support, the participants noted that international and regional institutions do not usually provide adequate support to national institutions; they explained the reasons for this as competition for funds amongst institutions, poor co-ordination of their activities and by an inadequate level of representation of the African institutions in regional and international organizations. They also consider that donors should improve the co-ordination of their support and standardize their approaches to livestock development policies (e.g. from free drug delivery to full cost recovery and, in between, different levels of subsidies).Finally, participants at both seminars recognized that tremendous efforts towards regional co-operation and collaboration have been made recently but that there is still much to be done. The top priority remains to establish sectoral policies on harmonization of imports, exports and standards. A second key condition is a free flow of information among countries, in particular for the development and promotion of trade. This is particularly critical for the control of livestock movement, quarantine enforcement and epidemiological surveillance, for better understanding of the markets, and for the characterization and conservation of animal genetic resources. In addition, this free flow of information will help to break the isolation felt by professionals in the various countries.The main recommendations of both seminars have been amalgamated and classified. A distinction has been made between those which have to be implemented at the country level and those addressing the regional dimension. A few recommendations that apply at both the national and regional levels have been included in each part for comprehensiveness. These national and regional recommendations have been classified into five broad categories:General development policies; 2. Research needs; 3. Information needs; 4. Human resources; and 5. Institutional arrangements. Finally, within each category, the recommendations were grouped according to the four following technical themes: i) marketing and trade; ii) livestock production systems; iii) animal health and genetic resources; and iv) information management and communications.A quick analysis of these recommendations indicates that the participants clearly have a better understanding of what should be done at the national level rather than at the regional level (participants had three times more recommendations for the former). At the national level, they have formulated specific recommendations for each category and for almost all themes. Specific recommendations on what should be done to develop or strengthen regional co-operation are more scattered, with the notable exception of recommendations concerning animal health (50% of all regional recommendations).A high priority is to build the capacity of each country to develop appropriate policies, formulate strategies and evaluate their impact.Each country should develop a clearly stated and consistent policy for the development of the livestock sector. Frequent change of policy is to be avoided as it creates uncertainty and undermines the confidence of producers and investors. Existing policies which are not conducive to agriculture and livestock development should be reviewed as a matter of urgency. Governments should also prepare detailed national strategies and investment plans.Governments should promote capacity-building to understand and analyse marketing and trade issues better and to enforce anti-dumping mechanisms and countervailing duties as provided for under the WTO. Special attention should be given to the negative effects of food aid and food subsidies. Appropriate pricing policies should be implemented which establish a fair balance between the interests of the producers and the consumers. This could involve imposition of appropriate tariffs and duties on imports.Governments should encourage or strengthen the utilization of grading systems and standards for livestock products, promote the markets for quality products and meet consumers needs. Similarly, quality assurance should be put in place on inputs needed for livestock development.Governments should promote and regulate markets for livestock products but gradually withdraw from trading. Governments should formulate strategies to transfer some marketing responsibilities from the public to the private sector.Governments should promote competition in the supply of inputs. Provision of credit lines would help individuals to enter the business of input supply.The private sector should play a leading role in the establishment of storage and processing facilities.Credit regulations should be geared towards the promotion of livestock development.Measures taken to develop the livestock sub-sector should pay attention to the environment as a whole, both to ensure the sustainability of natural resources and to keep peri-urban pollution in check.Any improvement measures should be appropriate to the agricultural production system to which they are being applied. They should correspond to technical and economic elements specific to each livestock sub-sector.Governments of the region should correct the uneven distribution of bents of resources under extensive production systems and encourage the participatory management of resources at community level, and in collaboration with the private sector.Land-tenure systems should be adjusted towards ensuring appropriate measures for sustainable productivity. Specific issues to be addressed are: ownership of the land, grazing rights, methods of assessing communal resources and management.Public and private sectors should ensure integrated management practices that optimize the productivity of extensive productive systems.Combined production of crops and livestock should be promoted as a way of diversifying farm production and of ensuring better use of animal manure for soil improvement.Recognizing the trend towards livestock intensification in heavily populated areas, and in consideration of the risks of contacting zoonotic diseases, governments should promote awareness in order to minimize public-health risks.In recognizing the need for quality animal health services, governments should take into account the ability of the private sector to provide such services and should continue to support and strengthen privatization processes.While recognizing and appreciating the role of livestock owners' organizations and community animal health workers in the delivery of animal health services, governments should make deliberate efforts to promote these delivery systems whilst ensuring that the quality of the services is not unduly compromised, and that these delivery systems operate within an appropriate regulatory framework.Considering the persistent inadequate provision of financial resources by governments in animal health and the resultant insufficiently high status of disease and in recognition of the consequences thereof, governments should improve funding of core animal health functions while at the same time promoting systems.National genetic improvement plans should be designed to promote the conservation and use of appropriate breeds adapted to local production conditions.Immediate attention should be given to the identification, characterization and conservation of existing animal genetic resources, with particular emphasis on the respective environment in which these genetic resources are kept.Countries should develop, with the full participation of all stakeholders, particularly producers, research strategies consistent with agricultural and livestock development policies. All components of the national agricultural research system, i.e. government research departments or institutions, universities, and private organizations, should play an active role in identifying research priorities.Governments, in collaboration with the private sector, should promote market research. A market research unit should be established in each National Agricultural Research Systems (NARS).Governments should encourage policy research which includes integrated extensive production systems taking into account the protection of the environment. The benefits of integrated farming systems and equitable distribution of the benefits derived should therefore be emphasized.Assessing the disease risks associated with the interaction of livestock and wildlife in mixed farming is very necessary.Recognizing the importance of research in supporting animal health programmes, governments should promote and support the following activities: identification of research priorities through a participatory approach involving all stakeholders. development of research on diagnostic tools and vaccines for major livestock diseases; animal health services delivery systems; and genetic resistance to diseases. development of national, regional and international research, and establishestablishment and strengthening of research-extension linkages. v) evaluation of research programmes at regular intervals. ment / rehabilitation of diagnostic reference laboratories.Realizing the lack of information on the characteristics of local animal genetic resources and on their production environment, and that this information is critical for their use and development, govemments should promote and support the following activities:Applied research to develop and adapt methods which will facilitate rapid identification and documentation of existing animal genetic resources, characterization of breeds and their production attributes, and comparative evaluation of indigenous and exotic genotypes with particular attention to the respective production environments.Strategic research to identify uniqueness of populations using advanced molecular technologies; to exploit genetic variation in adaptive traits, including resistance to disease; and to speed up progress in breed improvement programmes and in facilitating ex situ cryo-conservation of endangered breeds by using biotechnology.Governments should develop information and communication policies sed on reliable data sources in order to strengthen the capacity of all national stakeholders to improve livestock production in a sustainable manner.Partnerships should be established between the public and private sectors in information and data collection, dissemination and utilization.The collection and dissemination of information associated with markets should be encouraged in order to guide the pricing of inputs and of livestock and 4.livestock products. Similarly, governments should reinforce marketing awareness in extension services. Improvements in methods of processing and preserving animal products should also be accompanied by better dissemination of information on technologies.In view of the importance of efficient information systems in animal health programmes, especially in regional or international collaboration, efforts should be made to strengthen establish information networks, both nationally and regionally, which will facilitate the flow and exchange of information between countries.An inventory of resources in the livestock sector should be developed for each country, and for the different regions.All levels of training should be adapted to the evolving needs of livestock producers.All institutions of higher education should take appropriate measures to adjust their curricula so as to make them responsive to the emerging needs of the livestock sub-sector.Governments should encourage the formation of farmer and trader ions to enable them to pool resources by mobilizing their own savings and credit for investment in the development of marketing infrastructure, particularly for the storage and processing of livestock products.Considering the importance of wildlife in the epidemiology of some of the major livestock diseases (for example, rinderpest and rabies), co-operation and collaboration between wildlife services and national veterinary services should be strengthened.Recognizing the important role of societies, co-operatives, breeders' associations and other similar organizations in livestock development and in representing the interests of livestock owners, governments should either create a favourable environment in which existing associations can function, or create such associations if they do not already exist.Consultation and co-ordination among donors and national and regional institutions should be promoted in order to develop joint strategies and programmes.Individual countries and African and regional organizations (such as the African Development Bank) should be encouraged to support livestock development by contributing to the funding of national research and development programmes.Regional policies for the promotion of trade must be strengthened. Therefore, countries should harmonize their import and export regulations as well as their policies on standards.All countries should comply with existing international agreements and conventions, and developed countries should empower the less-developed countries to implement and comply with them.A regional body should be identified or created in West and Central Africa to monitor and promote trade in livestock and livestock products between countries within the region.Considering that transboundary disease is a problem of major concern to the respective countries, the control of livestock movements, quarantine enforcement and disease surveillance should be strengthened by all possible means through regional co-operation.Considering the value of contingency and emergency plans in combating livestock diseases, each country should put in place as soon as possible such plans as to facilitate timely and efficient response to disease threat or outbreak.In recognizing the heavy tasks involved in vaccination campaigns against major epizootic diseases and the need to efficiently control or eradicate these diseases, governments should explore ways and means of intensifying vaccination campaigns against such diseases, including the participation of private narians.Considering the importance of wildlife in the epidemiology of some of the major livestock diseases (for example, rinderpest and rabies), the epidemiological surveillance of the relevant diseases should be enhanced through the involvement of regional and international governments and organizations.2.1 2.2.Recognizing that animal genetic resources are distributed across national boundaries and that the problems related to the use and conservation of animal genetic resources are common across countries, regional collaboration should be strengthened in the following areas: breed characterization; breed development and improvement; regional trade in local germplasm; and identification of medium-and long-term regional livestock development policies and market opportunities.Governments, in collaboration with the private sector and regional research organizations (ASARECA, CORAF and SACCAR), should promote market research to assess the regional and international market structure, its conduct and performance.Recognizing the importance of research in supporting animal health programmes, the following research activities should be undertaken at the regional level: i) identification of research priorities through a participatory approach involving all stakeholders.strong support of research on diagnostic tools and vaccines for major livestock diseases; animal health services delivery systems; and genetic resistance to diseases. support for the of national, regional and international research and diagnostic reference laboratories. iv) regular evaluation of the impact of research programmes.Governments should develop information and communication policies based on reliable data sources in order to strengthen the capacity of all stakeholders to improve livestock production at national and regional levels in a sustainable manner. Regional policies should be established to allow for the effective free flow of quality information among countries and to break the isolation of professionals in the various countries.Partnerships should be established between the public and private sectors in information and data collection, dissemination and utilization.In view of the importance of efficient information systems in animal health programs, especially in regional or international collaboration, the establishment of regional information networks which will facilitate the exchange and flow of information between countries should be promoted.Recognizing the inadequacy of trained manpower in veterinary sciences in some countries and the surplus in others, regional technical co-operation should be enhanced to allow the movement of trained manpower between member countries and the utilization of training facilities by needy member countries.All institutions of higher education should take appropriate measures to adjust their curricula so as to make them responsive to the emerging needs of the livestock sub-sector; they should also work towards the standardization and harmonization of their curricula for acceptance by all member countries and the facilitating of regional technical co-operation.International policies should be established to stimulate and promote North-South professional linkages.Recognizing recent global developments in the area of agro-biodiversity in relation to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the establishment of the Intergovernmental Technical Working Group on animal genetic resources under the Commission of Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture within the FAO, and recognizing the role of as an inter-governmental body of African states, the meeting recommended that be included in these negotiations.Consultation and co-ordination mechanisms among donors and national and regional institutions should, by means of joint programmes, be enhanced so that they adapt their mandates to their intervention capacities.In close consultation with the countries, donors should improve their support co-ordination and standardize their approaches to livestock development policies. Specifically, they should consult regularly with one another and provide timely information to beneficiary institutions and governments.Individual countries and African and regional organizations (such as the African Development Bank) should show an increased interest in livestock development by contributing to the funding of regional research and development programmes. Donors, as well as international organizations and national governments, should offer more support to regional research organizations such as ASARECA, CORAF and SACCAR to enable them to engage in scientific development and to improve the co-ordination of livestock research in sub-Saharan Africa.Both seminars were followed immediately by meetings of the highest authorities in charge of the livestock sub-sector: a meeting of Ministers of Agriculture for West and Central Africa (Cameroon, February 1996) and the 5th OAU Conference of Ministers Responsible for Animal Resources (Swaziland, August which covers the whole African continent.As usual, the OAU Ministerial Conference was preceded by a meeting of the directors responsible for animal resources. These directors have the responsibility of preparing the documents to be discussed and approved by the Ministers and, in fact, most of those from the Eastern and Southern regions participated in the CTNOAU-IBAR seminar in Mbabane. The summary of recommendations of both the Abidjan and the Mbabane meetings presented above was tabled as a discussion paper to the Directors' technical meeting. In addition, a much shorter, more \"political\" statement targeted at the Ministers was also prepared for their consideration.The Directors' meeting discussed and endorsed the report and recommendations of the two seminars on livestock development policies in sub-Saharan Africa. The Ministers responsible for animal resources followed the recommendations of their directors and made several resolutions. These resolutions are quoted in extenso hereunder as they cover almost all the aspects discussed at the CTNOAU-IBAR seminars. Obvious references to policies are mentioned in italics.The Conference of Ministers Responsible for Animal Resources in its Fifth Ordinary Session in Mbabane, Swaziland, from 4-8 August 1997;Cognizant that livestock contributes up to 40% of agricultural GDP in the majority of African countries;Aware that there are few livestock development policies and strategies in place in African countries;Realizing that inter-and intra-African trade in livestock and livestock products should be promoted to improve self-sufficiency and to discourage dumping;Cognizantthat adequate human resources in the livestock sector are not equally distributed in all countries, and that educational curricula will need to be reassessed to meet changes in demand;Realizing that there is a necessity to protect the natural resource base and make more efficient use of resources especially through regional co-operation;Realizing that any policy should address the problems of poverty alleviation and food security especially with respect to women;Concerned that uncontrolled movement of livestock continues to be the main cause of epidemic livestock diseases;Recognizing the need for the continued supply of animal health services;Taking into account the richness and diversity of animal genetic resources of Africa THE CONFERENCE RESOLVES:Each country should develop and implement with the participation of all stakeholders a clearly defined policy together with the relevant strategies and investment plans with short-, medium-and long-term objectives for the development of the livestock sector.Taking into account the increased urbanization in Africa, the policy should, of necessity, address market demands.Aware of the fact that some countries already have existing policies, OAU and OIE should assist these countries to secure financial support to implement the policies.In defining and re-defining their national livestock development policy, governments should consider the comparative advantages of harmonizing and co-ordinating the national policies under a regional to be set up as a matter of urgency not only to encourage regional and trade in livestock and livestock products but also to address the problem of disease control and information exchange.The Conference calls on member states to:1. establishhe-establish a strong central veterinary authority with clear policies, effective systems of management and compliance at all levels of government and service provision from top to grassroot level;2 . develop emergency plans to deal with epidemic diseases and provide adequate funding for livestock services;provide adequate training programmes and resources, with the assistance of the OAU, OIE and other international institutions if required for veterinarians for efficient execution of their functions.3.The Conference requests member states:1. to take as a priority all measures to eradicate rinderpest from the remaining infected areas;not under immediate threat of rinderpest to cease vaccination and join the OIE \"pathway\" to freedom from infection;to ensure that all outbreaks of severe disease in wildlife be thoroughly investigated and that continuous sero-surveillance of wildlife populations be carried out, and that, to facilitate this, free-living wildlife populations must not be vaccinated against rinderpest;to initiate measures to improve livestock movement control.2.4.The Conference calls on the Secretary-General of the OAU to:1. take action and organize a pan-African programme to CBPP from Africa along the lines of the PARC programme; mobilize the necessary resources for implementation of the recommendation and prepare a report on its progress for the 6th Session.The Conference recommends that: adequate funding be made available to (a) collect, analyse and disseminate the required information on the positive and negative effects of livestock on the environment; and (b) develop and test the necessary tools for enhancing public awareness and improving capacities of all stakeholders in policies and technologies to promote sustainable livestock development;2. livestock-environment policy analysis be integrated in the national agricultural sector and environmental action plans.Resolution No. 6 -Food Security and Livestock AgricultureThe Conference resolves that: special attention should be paid to the maintenance and improvement of household resource security with the objective of alleviating poverty especially in the rural areas, and thereby improving the food security situation; livestock should have adequate emphasis in food security;governments should ensure that special attention is paid to gender issues in policy formulation for food security.3.The Conference calls on governments and OAU to:provide economic, technical and political support to individual countries and regional trade groups to enable them to:i. harmonize livestock production and trade policies;ii. create an appropriate policy and institutional environment;iii. strengthen their capacity to monitor livestock flows and prices and the impact of protective measures on regional market development;iv. initiate and implement actions to reduce marketing costs;promote private-sector investment in livestock marketing infrastructure;vi. foster bilateral negotiations and unilateral reductions of tariff and iff barriers within and between sub-regions;vii. facilitate financial transactions and improve commercial links between ensure that livestock products are of high quality to compete in world mardevise a mechanism for a continent-wide protection of markets from dumping of livestock products; bring together regional trade groups under one umbrella which will co-ordinate their activities and ensure that they have a strong bargaining power.countries; and kets.3.The Conference resolves that:1. each country should have commitment to research and should develop clear and consistent livestock research policies and research should be demand driven;livestock research be accorded high priority and be adequately funded; exchange research information and resources at regional and national levels;existing regional research co-ordination mechanisms be used to promote research for livestock development.3.Having formulated these sound recommendations and good resolutions is obviously not enough. The key question remains on how to implement them. In fact, this was one of the first questions raised at the Mbabane seminar by a participant who suggested that \"the organization of the seminar should be inclusive of means of promoting the implementation of policy recommendations\". The answer from both the CTA representative and the Director of OAU-IBAR was that the participants at the seminars were selected because they have the authority to implement any recommendations and resolutions after endorsement by the Conference of Ministers.While this comment is true, the recommendations and resolutions still have to be translated into action plans both for individual countries and regional organizations. This has to be done as soon as possible so as to not lose the momentum gained by the two seminars and the increased receptivity of the Ministers on these policy issues.The experience of ISNAR and other agencies is that action plans should be brief, make a distinction between not only short-, medium-and long-term actions but also between actions which need no, or a very small amount of, funds for implementation and those for which external assistance would be necessary. The responsible institution or individual for implementing each action has also to be clearly identified and mentioned. Finally, the best means for the governments to obtain the additional funds for the second set of actions is, of course, to demonstrate strong political will for change by starting to implement the first set.The institutions involved in organizing these two seminars appear to be the most suited to assist the governments and the regional organizations and associations, if they need external assistance for the preparation of such action plans. Among them, OAU-IBAR has probably the key and most difficult role to play in trying to keep the momentum. One of the most promising entry and leverage points to achieve this would be for OAU-IBAR to strengthen its collaboration with the existing regional research and development organizations.The overall objective of these seminars was to contribute to the ongoing debate on policies aimed at promoting effective, efficient and sustainable livestock development whilst managing natural resources in developing countries. This overall objective has been achieved, as well as the three specific objectives:Clear, precise and realistic recommendations were formulated. This was achieved mainly through the presentation and discussion of well-documented keynote papers, the extensive time spent in working groups and, equally importantly, through informal interactions during the seminar breaks and evenings which allowed participants to exchange views and information and to build a common vision of what has to be done to ensure livestock development on an effective, efficient and sustainable basis.The national dimension was apprehended better than the regional one but, even for the latter, clear priorities were set which, when implemented, would mean a significantbreakthrough. The dedication, the commitment, and the sense of responsibility of all participants were obvious and are highly commendable. The Director of OAU-IBAR, in his opening speech in Mbabane to the meeting of Directors Responsible for Animal Resources, also reminded the participants of the duty they have to convince their ments to put in place policies for the sustainable development of the livestock sector.The second major achievement of the seminars was to have identified the bottlenecks and key constraints which must be alleviated in order to facilitate the formulation of sound livestock development policies. The lack of expertise and of reliable information to analyse and formulate policies came top of the list. Immediately after it came the need to improve the flow of information between the different actors (public and private) in the livestock industry at both national and regional levels, and the implications in terms of harmonization of data collection, transparency in circulating information, access to and exchange of new technologies, and improvements in the modes of communication. The need to have clear research strategies and to carry out more research, not only on technical subjects like the characterization of the indigenous breeds, the study of disease resistance or the production of diagnostic tools and new vaccines, but also on policies, markets and the whole socio-economic dimension of the livestock sub-sector also came out very strongly. Regional co-operation, and the urgent need for the harmonization of imports, exports and standards policies, were also identified by the participants as two of the top priorities for action.Making policy-makers aware of the existence of, in some cases, counter-productive policies for 1ivestock development and, more generally, the absence of policies favouring an enabling environment for the private sector to play a more active role in livestock production were rapidly achieved mainly by planning the seminars to take place just before Ministerial meetings. The best evidence of this is the text adopted by the 5th OAU Conference of Ministers Responsible for Animal Resources, which really concentrated on policy issues.In conclusion, the two seminars demonstrated very clearly that in sub-Saharan Africa, just as in any other part of the world, sound livestock development policies are a prerequisite for promoting effective, efficient and sustainable development while managing natural resources. More importantly, these seminars have led to the formulation of sound recommendations which have been translated into resolutions taken by the OAU Ministers Responsible for Animal Resources. All national, regional and international resources now have to be pulled together urgently to provide the enabling environment for the livestock sub-sector to fulfil the needs and expectations of both the producers and the consumers. In this respect, the two seminars have launched a process with a solid foundation.","tokenCount":"6863"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1739395176.json b/data/part_2/1739395176.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..59407a35f1d16bdbe4ac4ddec3de1918d02063b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1739395176.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e26821c7e00d1e2e3b2d6267f88d9e03","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://publications.iwmi.org/pdf/H031914.pdf","id":"-1698202746"},"keywords":["nulriennl depletion","vegarable","farming. urhan agriculture","environmental pollution"],"sieverID":"328da4c4-cab7-442f-a0a7-56af71280979","pagecount":"7","content":"In a response to rapid urban growth in Africa, specialized urban and peri-urban vegetable production systems emerge and contribute significantly to urban food security. these production systems are dominated by smallholders and can achieve despite poor soils astonishing high profits. This, however, require intensive fertilization (e.g. 100-200 tiha poultry manure) and year-round irrigation of 600-1600 mm, which adds further nutrients but also contributes to nutrient leaching. In this highly dynamic input-output system fanners are demonstrating that ,,permanent\" cropping is possible on poor tropical soils but for the price of high N and K losses and water eutrophication. The situation is described for the case of lettuce, cabbage and spring onion farming in and around Kumasi, Ghana. Nutrient balances and depletion costs have also been calculated for the more conventional (rural) maize-cassava intercrop for comparison as well as rainfed tomato farming. From fanners point of view, the ,,costs\" of nutrient mining vary with the availability of farm land. In the conventional system, fanner still can to shift when soil fertility is low, thus pay only for the preparation of a new field. In the land constrained urban vegetable system the costs of nutrient mining can best be assessed through their replacement costs via poultry manure or mineral fertilizer. Additional off-site costs of the vegetable system might be balanced through the fertilizer value of the water (for irrigation) and appears in general marginal in comparison with water pollution through the urban run-off.Soil nutrient depletion is one of the most serious forms of land degradation in large parts of Africa where negative soil nutrient balances are a predominant feature (Stoorvogel and Smaling, 1990, Smaling, 1998). Exceptions are compound farms, backyards or systems with external input, e.g. manure derived from off-farm grazing (Vlaming et al., 1997;Smaling and Braun, 1996). This paper has its focus on input intensive urban and pen-urban agriculture, which appear as response 10 rapid urban growth in large parts of Africa. These permanent farming systems are specialized on perishable crops, such as vegetables and can contribute significantly to urban food security. As nutrient balance data from such systems are hardly to find (Van den Bosch et d., 2001). this paper tries to compare nutrient depletion and its costs for the farmer in three selected urban, peri-urban and rural farming systems. It also tries to outline off-site effects on environment and health on the case of Kuinasi, Ghana MATERIALS AND METHODS Data on urban, peri-urban, and rural farming systems and lheir nutrient management (feertilizalion, residue management, etc.) were obtained through farm surveys addressing in total 238 farms around Kumasi and 100 open-space and backyard farins in urban Kumasi. The information obtained (yields, inputs used, etc.) was translated into nutrient in-and oulputs in kg per hectare and year using nutrient content data from standard literature (cf. Annex I). Data on erosion. nutrients in rainwater etc. were obtained From expert consultation, local literature and laboratory analysis. Data on nutrient leaching were estimated as 20% of applied potassium, which is a compromise between the transfer function given by Stoorvogel and Smaling (1990) and the results of Poss el al. (1997). For nitrogen leaching we applied the transfer function of Stoorvogel and Smaling (1990). For irrigated urban vegetable production we estimated the leachinghunoff figures through the comparison of laboratory data of farm and control plots under consideration of all other nutrient in-and outputs. Nutrient content of imgation water was analysed in the laboratory by standard methods and compared with data provided by Cornish et al. (1999). Data on soil nutrient pools in pen-urban Kumasi were taken from Quansah (2000) and IBSRAM/KNUST (unpubl.). Data on nutrients in ash from different 2-4 years old fallows were taken from Van Reuler and Janssen (1993) and Anthofer and Kroschel (2001). Nutrient recovery in ash was assumed as 5-7% o f N , 64-73% of P, 38-42% of K in fallow biomass following the same authors. The assessment of the fallow contribution and leaching losses would require more sophisticated field studies than it was possible so far.The costs of nutrient depletion were estimated using the replacement cost approach (Drechsel and Gyiele, 1999) and the land rental a farmer would have to pay to acquire (shifting cultivation) a new plot in rural and peri-urban areas (cf. Annex I).Among the various field types identified in and around Kumasi (Table 1) we focussed in this report on the following three:+ Intensive urban open-space mixed vegetable production (year round irrigated with drain water)+ Intensive peri-urban tomato production (rainfed) + Traditional rural cassava-rnarze production (for comparison)Less than 10% of the farmers use mineral fertilizers and if then only at a modest rate. Only a small minority of the farmers applies (poultry) manure. The nitrogen losses through harvest are not compensated for by these low nutrient inputs or through slash and burn, neither in an assumed low fertility/productivity nor a normal fertility/productivity scenario (Table 2). This exploitation of the soil nutrient pool requires to shifting cultivation. Ash depletion accompanied by the infestation of weeds is the main reason for abandoning a field after cassava harvest, and to open another field. As even the N input of a 20-yr fallow would not be sufficient to supply sufficient nitrogen (Van Reuler and Janssen, 1993) the incorporation of Mucuna for N-fixation might be an interesting option to balance the N outputs (Anthofer and Kroschel, 2001). It is interesting to note that not the low inherent soil P pool but nitrogen appears to be the limiting factor. In view of cost assessments, it would be inappropriate to use the replacement cost approach to assess the costs of nutrient depletion as long a s shifting cultivation is practised. The rental of a new plot is about 10-50 USD/ha depending among others on its proximity to the city. Clearing (slash and bum) would costs additional 40 USD/ha but this cost factor might be accommodated in the farming budget. A survey carried out by NRI and partners around Kumasi did not reveal a connection between land price (value) and presumed soil fertility (Adam, 2001, pers. communication). However, Nunan et al. (2000;p. 87) reported that land rental might differ according to soil quality. This might become more significant as fallow periods for soil regeneration are declining in the peri-urban areaAkumadan is a production area in the vicinity of Kumasi specialised on tomato farming. The data show that farmers use mineral fertilizer in excess of crop demand resulting in all scenarios we calculated in positive soil N, P, and K balances (Table 2). This confirms earlier results reported by Quansah (2000). To verify this assessment it ivould be necessary to get field data on nutrient losses through run-off However. it appears that this system does not produce on-site costs of nutrient mining but might cause off-site effects due to (ground-and stream-) water eutrophication (Kyei-Baffour and Mensah. 1993). On the other hand, irrigated farninz downstrean ofthis area might henelit from the increased nutrient load. This is a very in-and output intensive farming system as the nutrient flows show (Table 2). Poultry manure (PM) application rates are high as many soils are sandy and frequent irrigation is leaching the applied nutrients (Table 3). PM is applied over the year at a rate of 50t/ha on cabbage and 150 t/ha on lettuce and spring onions (range 100 -240 tnla). For NPK mostly a 15-15-15 blend was used, partly supplemented by Ammonium Sulphate. In general, urban farmers rely only on poultry manure except for cabbage which receives a certain amount of NPK while peri-urban vegetable farmers use low amounts of industrial fertilizer and add poultq~ manure as a supplemenl. 4) which contains especially downstream of the city significant amounts of nitrogen. In our calculations we used moderate (upstream) nutrient contents.Nutrient input through wet and dry deposition, on the other hand, is modest: 6 kg N, 4 kg P205 and 8 kg K20 (Anthofer and Kroschel, 2001). Nutrient losses through erosion are relatively small in this bed and furrow system but leaching rates are high due to the sandy soil texture.The high number of growing periods over the year and related high frequency of harvests is also significantly contributing to nutrient losses. Lettuce can be cultivated 9-1 1 timedyr, cabbage 2-3 times/yr, and spring onions 8-9 times/yr. As only 25% of all farmers interviewed leave vegetable residues on their fields another significant amount of nutrients, is lost with the residues (Table 2). In summary, the nutrient balances of easily leached N and K are negative while (non-leachable) phosphates accumulate in the topsoil. Irrigation downstream of the city could improve the negative N balance, however, not balance it. Only better residue management could turn the nepative N and K balances ofthis system into positive ones. Nutrient losses, however, concern leached N and K as well as accumulated (wasted) P. These costs account for 10 USD per ha and year if replaced with poultp manure (only N and K) or 79 USD if also P is considered.In input intensive (peri)urban farming, the high load of nutrients can be washed into streams or the shallow ground water andas stated earlier oncontribute to water eutrophication (Kyei-Baffour and Mensah, 1993). The nutrients might re-enter the system by providing a significant contribution to the nutrient requirements of irrigated crops. This is consistent with interviews held with farmers who believed the water provided a detectable fertilizer benefit to their crops (Cornish et al., 1999). Thus off-site costs due to water eutrophication might be balanced for by the fertilizer value of the water. In the rural-urban continuum, nutrient balance assessments confirm that the traditional rural staple crop production system is based on ash (and soil) nutrient depletion which the farmer is trying to counteract through continuous shifting cultivation. In intensive rainfed tomato production, on the other hand, farmers are apparently using too high fertilizer rates which results in generally positive nutrient balances (or over-fertilisation). Even more dramatic is the situation in irrigated urban vegetable farming. Here the dilemma of the urban farmers derives from the limited farming space in the urban context without options for shifting cultivation.Their output oriented cash crop production thus depends fertility. Farmers are in a vicious cycle again and again high rates of nutrients which they are leaching through high irrigation rates. At the end of the year, their systems show P accumulation and N and K mining. Offsite effects on water quality are likely through runoff and leaching of nutrients but more harm will derive from E. coli and pesticide contamination of water bodies (Drechsel et d., 2000).","tokenCount":"1744"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1739500961.json b/data/part_2/1739500961.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..878598d18c2b2035f586ce3e066d2a2352ce2162 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1739500961.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"4a7e60df7f62bd8d43710f02776158cf","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/5447e64c-08f9-4850-86de-96fe0ccdd7ea/retrieve","id":"-1712061383"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"58cb7191-237a-4716-bd17-68b2047a9c30","pagecount":"4","content":"The proposal for the Sub-Saharan Africa Challenge Program (SSA CP) provides a detailed analysis of the current state of African agriculture and the complex causal dynamics that underlie rural poverty on the continent. Volume 2 of the SSA CP proposal contains dozens of papers and reference documents that elaborate on problems and promising solutions in both scientific and policy domains. These papers were highly influential in stimulating discussions at the 2003 formulation workshop. Since many readers of this Brief will be familiar with the challenges facing African agriculture, we will not discuss problem analysis in detail, focusing instead on the innovative set of interventions proposed under the SSA CP. All three volumes of the SSA CP proposal are available in electronic form on the FARA web site (www.fara-africa.org) and as a CD ROM by request to FARASub-Saharan Africa has the tragic distinction of being the only region in the world where overall food security and livelihoods are deriorating rather than improving. In a region where 70% of the population live in rural areas, a structural food deficit has persisted for more than 30 years, leading to the highest levels of per capita food aid in the world. Looking to the future, a number of factors (including climate change, population growth, poverty, declining soil fertility and availability of water, rural-urban migration, HIV/AIDS, gender biases against women farmers, weak infrastructure and markets, and counterproductive policies) will worsen the situation still further, unless major efforts are made to arrest these trends.Moreover, problems at the farm level are becoming more complex, the global economic context is in a state of flux and the institutional environment within African nations is experiencing change. Africa needs to raise the productivity of its smallscale farmers at a time when world commodity prices are at an all-time low. Support policies, technical change and market efficiencies in more advanced countries have combined to increase competition in world markets and reduce the price of agricultural products. Limited government budgets will not support a return to the types of subsidies and market interventions that characterized the early part of the post-colonial period. Policies must therefore move away from price and market interventions and towards strengthening institutions, infrastructure and technical change processes if they are to foster profitable production and promote links between farmers and the urban and/or sub-regional markets. Such institutional innovations provide a new context for thinking about agricultural research and development.Recognizing the implications of these challenges, the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD), established in 2001, set itself the goal of increasing agricultural output by 6% per year for the next 20 years. To flesh out a strategy for achieving this goal, the Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA) conducted an extensive consultation process between 2002 and 2004, with input from more than 100 scientists. This process identified numerous issues as potential constraints, with the following most frequently given highest priority: a) failure of agricultural markets; b) inappropriate policies; and c) natural resource degradation.Those involved in the planning process agreed that addressing these three issues in isolation has failed to raise the The Sub-Saharan Africa Challenge Program (SSA CP) shows how the principles of institutional learning and change (ILAC) can be applied. This Brief outlines the basic components of the SSA CP and highlights various ILAC features of the Program. These include an innovation systems orientation; an approach to 'thinking globally and acting locally'; the location of research within a broader context of policy, market and institutional change; and an emphasis on collaboration and learning among program participants and with other agencies involved in agricultural research and development in Africa.productivity and profitability of African agriculture to a sufficient extent or in a sustainable way. Although the traditional approach to agricultural research and development has brought about significant advances, its fragmented and reductionist nature makes it unable to deal with complex challenges. A new paradigm is called for that can foster synergy among disciplines and institutions, along with a renewed commitment to change at all levels -from farmers to national and international policymakers. The Sub-Saharan Africa Challenge Program (SSA CP) is based on such a paradigm, entitled Integrated Agricultural Research for Development (IAR4D).The SSA CP has three major thrusts: 1. A set of principles for conducting research for development that squarely address the complexity and heterogeneity of farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa. 2. A new research agenda that recognizes the need for an integrated approach to research and addresses the interactions between natural resource management, production systems and agricultural markets and policies. 3. A focus on institutional change and new partnerships involving all stakeholders, especially smallholders and pastoralists, in addressing the problems of food production and maintaining the resource base for future generations. Through IAR4D, the SSA CP aims to transform the way that sectors and institutions approach agricultural research. Among other things, this will entail a shift from narrowly focused sectoral concerns to cooperative, gender-sensitive, integrated approaches, including publicprivate sector linkages. The Program will be characterized by a collaborative effort among researchers (national, regional and international), extension agencies, policymakers, the private sector and civil society. The approach will embrace an institutional innovation process in which participatory, action-oriented methods drive research for development to solve critical problems.The IAR4D paradigm draws on successful experiences in Africa with integrated natural resource management (INRM), which takes a systems approach to managing the interactions between soils, water, pests and human interventions in agriculture (IAR4D also draws on Farming Systems Research, Ecosystem Science, Sustainable Development, Participatory Research, Livelihood Analysis and Knowledge Management). IAR4D goes beyond INRM, however, to encompass the domains of policies and markets and the effects these have on the productivity, profitability and sustainability of agriculture. Taking all these factors into account, the IAR4D agenda will focus on four objectives:• to develop technologies for the sustainable intensification of subsistence-oriented farming systems;• to develop smallholder production systems that are compatible with sound natural resource management;• to improve the accessibility and efficiency of markets for smallholder and pastoralist products; and• to promote the formulation and adoption of policies that encourage innovation and will lead to improved livelihoods for smallholders and pastoralists.These four research domains should not be seen as separate areas of intervention, because the interactions between them are as, if not more, important than the domains themselves. In particular, it is clear that intensifying agricultural production will only benefit the farmer if there is an accessible market, while natural resource management interventions and the policy sphere affect each of the other challenges in very influential ways. There are, therefore, quite deliberate overlaps in the actions proposed.Integrating research and action in these four domains already represents an improvement on current practice, but the IAR4D approach calls for an even broader scope of work. Four additional mechanisms or 'support pillars' are required to promote this new way of doing business and the out-scaling (to neighbouring villages or similar agro-ecosystems) and up-scaling (to connect with local, national and international governments and institutions and the private sector) of program outcomes. Figure 1 depicts the relationship among the various components of the IAR4D model and shows the components of the four support pillars.Because IAR4D represents a significant change from past approaches, it will be implemented in the SSA CP through a two-step process congruent with the principle of 'learning by doing'. For the first phase, pilot learning sites (PLS) have been selected by the three African sub-regional organizations: Conseil ouest et centre Africain pour la recherche et le développement agricoles (CORAF), the Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa (ASARECA) and the Southern African Development Community-Food and Natural Resources (SADC-FANR). One site per sub-region has been chosen, each characterized by a different but complementary set of constraints to sustainable development: the Kano-Katsina-Maradi transect in Niger and Nigeria; the Lake Kivu region in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda and Uganda; and a corridor from southern Malawi through central Mozambique into northeastern Zimbabwe. In each site, the most serious constraints faced by local communities have been identified and research hypotheses have been formulated to address these constraints.At the time of writing, pilot learning teams are being formed at each site to pursue the research hypotheses. These comprise representatives of stakeholder groups, including members from a variety of scientific disciplines (biophysical and social) and from diverse institutions (national agricultural research institutes, universities, centres of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research or CGIAR, advanced research institutes, extension agencies, the private sector and nongovernmental, community-based and farmers' organizations). The teams will have overall responsibility for identifying, developing and promoting adoption of innovations that emerge from their pilot learning sites.The three teams will begin their work with participatory problem identification with farmers. The problems will be addressed by task forces, who will pay particular attention to involving women -especially those who have been marginalized in past development efforts. Regardless of the particular focus of activities, all projects will include measures to meet the four overall interacting SSA CP objectives, i.e. intensification, natural resource management, policies and markets. Task forces will not only address matters of science, but will also focus on the institutional changes needed for effective functioning in IAR4D. Facilitation and mentoring services will be provided from the outset to ensure the teams work across disciplinary and institutional boundaries, and to foster broad changes in the institutional context. Team interventions will be driven by local needs, but they will draw on a significant amount of available knowledge and best-bet technologies, even while generating new methodologies and practices.The research conducted at the pilot learning sites will be organized to ensure that results can be out-scaled into neighbouring commu- nities and scaled up from local and national to international levels. Figure 2 illustrates the range of organizations and the roles they will play in scaling IAR4D up and out. The SSA CP will need to balance local tailoring of solutions with extrapolation of insights to other settings. This will require dissemination of information and capacity building to bring all players up to speed. Implementing and internalizing the IAR4D approach will draw on the innovation systems approach (Clark, 2001) and the principles of institutional innovation, self-directed learning and value addition that are intrinsic to the INRM framework (Campbell and Hagmann, 2003). As the African agricultural research community engages in mutual learning and dissemination of results, it should become a more interactive, interdependent and vibrant body of professionals with continental impact and recognition.Given the magnitude of the constraints to agricultural development, the innovative nature of IAR4D and the complexity of change dynamics, it will take at least 5 to 10 years to demonstrate the full impact of this new approach. However, experience (e.g. that of the African Highlands Initiative) suggests that within 1 or 2 years, tangible benefits will already be flowing from the work of the pilot learning teams. A preliminary evaluation of the Phase I work will be undertaken after the first year of operations to document the validity and challenges to implementing IAR4D in the initial three sites. Documentation of methodological innovations will also be included as part of this evaluation. Lessons learned will strengthen the approaches of the first three pilot teams, and contribute to the design of Phase II of the Challenge Program, in which it is hoped to launch an additional six pilot teams.Participation in the SSA CP is open to all stakeholders engaged in agricultural research for development in sub-Saharan Africa. Consistent with its mandate as the apex body for agricultural research in Africa, FARA will be responsible to these stakeholders for the overall conduct of the SSA CP. This will ensure the involvement of a broad range of institutions including advanced research institutions from the North and South, CGIAR centres, community-based organizations, farmer organizations, national agricultural research institutions, non-CGIAR international and regional agricultural research institutions, non-governmental organizations, private enterprise, sub-regional research organizations and other players in the production-to-consumption chain.The SSA CP is centred on a critique of the reductionist 'technology bullet' approach to problems in African agriculture. The IAR4D agenda meshes interventions in the agrobiophysical domain with those that address political, economic and social constraints. The focus on fostering organizational change and collaboration also aims to strengthen links among diverse institutions in the agricultural sector. In fact, part of the research agenda itself will be to improve understanding of how the four domains of research and diverse institutional players interact to facilitate or limit the development process, and what interventions are most effective at relaxing constraints.The overall agenda of the SSA CP is vast and complex, but the design is based on a set of simple principles: start small; start where the needs or opportunities are greatest; keep a sharp focus on what is required to resolve the problem; and treat all interventions as learning experiences. Given the great variety of opportunities and constraints at each of the learning sites, each teamin collaboration with local stakeholders -will conduct a participatory diagnostic process to identify a number of 'entry points' for launching research related to the four intervention domains. In this way, the research program will keep a systems perspective while taking tangible steps to address perceived problems.Science and research are essential, but are not the drivers: The CP appreciates the potential for increasing agricultural productivity through technological However, improved technologies are only one tool in an array of possible interventions. IAR4D promotes the concept that technological change will follow much more easily when conducive policies and market opportunities can be developed.Institutional theory defines the term 'institution' as 'cognitive, normative and regulative structures and activities that provide stability and meaning to social behavior' (Scott, 1995). In this sense, institutions comprise the 'taken-for-granted' context in which work is done. They help to define roles and guide expectations and interactions, but may also constrain actors from changing their behaviour. The SSA CP targets two types of institutions: organizational structures per se, and the 'rule systems' that govern interactions among diverse agencies working in the agricultural sector. The Program aims to improve the performance of African national agricultural research and extension systems and the way research organizations interact with stakeholders such as policymakers, extension agents, entrepreneurs and, of course, farmers. Policies, markets and legal frameworks are regarded as institutions and changing them (and the way they foster sustainable intensification of agriculture) is an important part of the IAR4D agenda.The CP targets the way stakeholders interact with one another at the individual level. Subtle biases and differences in problem perception can escalate into significant obstacles to collaboration across disciplines, organizations and sectors. Thus the Program will pay attention to team building and to fostering dialogue among stakeholders at all levels. Mutual understanding is seen as a prerequisite for joint learning, which, in turn, paves the way for change. The incentive structures of participating institutions may also require refining to ensure that scientists are rewarded for initiating and sustaining successful partnerships.Collaboration: From its inception, the SSA CP design process has been a collaborative one. The 2-year planning phase drew on extensive inputs from hundreds of scientists and other stakeholders, and the work at pilot site level will continue this tradition, involving male and female farmers and pastoralists, entrepreneurs, NGOs and community-based organizations, researchers, extension agents, politicians and policymakers. The scaling up and out of successful innovations will also rely on collaboration between pilot sites and with organizations and other stakeholders not directly involved in Program initiatives. Collaboration among pilot learning team members will also be essential; indeed, if they are not able to model collaborative practices, the credibility of the SSA CP will be called into question. The Program will explicitly target resources to support collaboration at all levels, and will document lessons learned so that effective processes can be replicated elsewhere.Learning: The innovative nature of IAR4D means that many of its features have to be tested and evaluated under different circumstances. In the context of the SSA CP, the term 'pilot' (referring to the learning sites and teams) is not used in the conventional sense. Rather, the term highlights the explicit intention of the Program to catalyse and capture lessons -not only about problems, but also about the implementation of IAR4D concepts and practices in the field. Participatory monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems will be put in place to promote continual feedback for learning and performance improvement. M&E will be applied to both research interventions and to the processes followed by the pilot learning teams and the Program overall. Provision has been made for technical training and skills development for team members as the need arises. Finally, the SSA CP will devote considerable resources to documenting and publicizing its work. Campbell, B. and Hagmann, J. (2003) ","tokenCount":"2766"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1740545525.json b/data/part_2/1740545525.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f60fc976f23b7cb479a0b5c520375a7f2d39bd67 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1740545525.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"5ad8964622949a74f97e4323b4484e4f","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/b015bb57-409f-4e74-9ce0-ef1ffe5d64ce/retrieve","id":"-1944205417"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"44d7fe7f-8fb2-49c5-be0e-3927e88114d9","pagecount":"20","content":"Under an agreement, the Centre for Advanced Water Research (CAWR), one of the GRIPP partners, provides technical support on the online publication platform (https://journals.qucosa.de/gripp) for the GRIPP Case Profile Series, offers editorial support to editors and prospective authors, and registers the series with Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ).Front cover photograph shows the collective monitoring of groundwater levels under the Andhra Pradesh Farmer-Managed Groundwater Systems (APFAMGS) project in India (photo: Jacob Burke, formerly Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]).The GRIPP Case Profile Series provides concise documentation and insight on groundwater solution initiatives from around the world to practitioners, decision makers and the general public. Each case profile report covers a contemporary intervention (innovation, technology or policy) or a series of applied groundwater management-related approaches aimed at enhancing groundwater sustainability from an environmental and socioeconomic perspective at local, national or international level. Integrated analysis of the approach, background, drivers, stakeholders, implementation, experiences and outcomes are discussed with a view to illustrating best practices, factors that could lead to success or failure, and wider applicability.Participatory Management and Sustainable Use of Groundwater A Review of the Andhra Pradesh Farmer-Managed Groundwater Systems Project in IndiaEste Perfil de caso del GRIPP evalúa si la participación proactiva de las comunidades rurales en la gestión de las aguas subterráneas contribuye positivamente al uso sostenible del recurso. La evaluación utiliza como estudio de caso el proyecto de larga duración (2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013) sobre Sistemas de aguas subterráneas gestionadas por campesinos de Andhra Pradesh (APFAMGS) en la India. La evaluación, aplicada en siete distritos, se basa en la revisión crítica y síntesis de la bibliografía existente y en visitas adicionales sobre el terreno realizadas cinco años después de la finalización del proyecto. El APFAMGS tenía como objetivo concienciar y producir cambios de comportamiento para lograr un uso sostenible de las aguas subterráneas, principalmente para el riego. El enfoque se centró en la transferencia de conocimientos y el fortalecimiento de capacidades para establecer procesos participativos susceptibles de favorecer medidas de gestión informales, así como en las tecnologías de apoyo al seguimiento hidrológico participativo y a la evaluación de las necesidades de agua para los cultivos. Además, fue fundamental sensibilizar acerca de las opciones de gestión de la demanda y abastecimiento de agua. El análisis indica que el APFAMGS ha contribuido a colmar las lagunas de conocimiento e información sobre los recursos hídricos subterráneos entre las comunidades agrícolas locales. Se ha observado cierto grado de reducción a largo plazo del bombeo de aguas subterráneas, pero no está claro si esto es atribuible al proyecto, y los efectos en la reducción del descenso del nivel de las aguas subterráneas pueden ser limitados y localizados. El enfoque del APFAMGS para la gestión participativa de las aguas subterráneas presentó limitaciones en lo que se refiere a los aspectos de equidad, con implicaciones para la sostenibilidad institucional del enfoque. El estudio proporciona orientación para promover a mayor escala instituciones más inclusivas y basadas en la gestión participativa de las aguas subterráneas. The disconnect between natural ecosystems and human systems represents a major bottleneck for sustainable management of natural resources (Sayers et al. 2016). This is particularly apparent in arid and semiarid environments that are heavily dependent on groundwater resources for livelihoods based on irrigated agriculture. Despite being a common-pool resource, groundwater development is primarily in the hands of private individuals (i.e., people acting only through self-interest and not representing any group, company or organization), because groundwater rights are linked to land rights in India (Saleth 1996). As a result of this and the high capital investment needed, groundwater development is undertaken by landowning, wealthier households aiming to profit from irrigated agriculture. The adverse impacts of groundwater overexploitation are, however, often disproportionately borne by small and marginal farmers, because they cannot afford to drill deeper as groundwater levels drop (Reddy 2005). This is particularly the case in areas occupied by hard rock aquifers, where drilling costs are higher. The failure of groundwater wells, one of the reasons for farmer suicides in India, is, in part, an outcome of these externalities, especially in drought-prone areas (Deshpande 2002;Reddy and Galab 2006).Until recently, no concrete efforts were made in India to bring groundwater under an appropriate system of management.The national model groundwater bill of 1970 1 largely serves as a guideline for documenting and notifying the status of groundwater development, while any regulatory and enforcement mechanisms are under the authority of individual state governments. Still, at the state level, groundwater has not been included in the more important water management initiatives, such as water users' associations (WUAs). 2 However, with rapidly increasing groundwater use and mounting signs of widespread depletion, state policy interventions have attempted to better manage the resource. Related policy advances vary across different states and union territories depending on the status of groundwater development and the socioeconomic and policy context. 3 Various formal approaches and methods, including demand management 4 and supply management, 5 have been implemented to restore groundwater levels. Despite the greater focus on groundwater, the impact of those efforts has been limited primarily due to the lack of enforcement, and where successful, the scalability depends highly on the socioeconomic conditions and political environment (Shah 2014).The failure of formal regulatory approaches has led India to experiment with informal, participatory groundwater management (PGM) initiatives 6 over recent decades (Shah 2014). Various participatory or community-based groundwater management interventions have been tried in different parts of India (Box 1). While some of these initiatives are funded by state governments, others are funded by bilateral funding agencies and local nongovernmental organizations (NGOs).Although most of these are small-scale initiatives (Verma et al. 2012;Reddy et al. 2014;Shah 2014;Sravanthi et al. 2015), some state governments in India are taking a keen interest in supporting and scaling up these initiatives, but not through formal institutions. 71 The model groundwater bill was subsequently revised in 1972, 1996, 2005, 2011and 2017(GoI 2020a).2 Participatory irrigation (via WUAs) has become a widespread strategy in Asia, Africa and Latin America to facilitate decentralization of the role of governments and enhancing the role of primary stakeholders in irrigation management. This, in principle, reduces public expenditure on irrigation, improves productivity, and helps to maintain irrigation systems. In India, a number of states (e.g., Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan and Odisha) initiated WUAs during the late 1990s and early 2000s. For instance, Andhra Pradesh has created 10,790 WUAs covering the entire command area (including canal and tank systems, but not groundwater irrigation systems) of the state at a cost of INR 5,000 crore (USD 710 million) with support from the World Bank (Reddy and Reddy 2005). 3 States such as Telangana continue to pursue supply side management (development of surface irrigation and recharging of groundwater), while some states, such as Andhra Pradesh, are supporting participatory groundwater management (PGM) initiatives. 4 Formal institutions for demand management include market-based approaches (e.g., private property rights, which respond to market instruments, pricing of water and energy, etc.), technology-based approaches (e.g., subsidies for micro-irrigation and other water-saving technologies), and nonmarket-based (direct and indirect) command-and-control regulations. Important regulations include institutional credit restrictions, minimum separation distance between wells, and registration of/licenses for well development and drilling companies. 5 Formal institutions for supply management include managed aquifer recharge (MAR) interventions, such as check dams, farm ponds, percolation tanks, etc. These are not referred to as formal institutions. They are mostly technical approaches, but adhering to the Indian strategy for MAR (CGWB 2020). 6 Informal groundwater management institutions are those that evolve at the local level through community initiatives and often promoted (supported) by NGOs. The scale of these institutions is typically limited to a few villages. Informal regulations include restrictions on the area under water-intensive crops (paddy, sugarcane, etc.), construction of new bore wells, etc. The APFAMGS project encouraged farmers to collect local data that can be used to make collective decisions on groundwater management.Other ongoing participatory approaches have been undertaken by, for example, the following:• Foundation for Ecological Security (FES), an NGO in Anand, India, focuses on the micro-watershed scale for water balance analysis and planning groundwater use along with communities in Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh.• Advanced Center for Water Resources Development and Management (ACWADAM), a civil society organization in Maharashtra, India, and Samaj Pragati Sahayog (SPS), a grassroots initiative in Madhya Pradesh, India, are working on knowledge-based, typology-driven aquifer management strategies similar to those of Pani Panchayats.• Barefoot College in Tiloniya, Rajasthan, focusing on social work and research, is making use of a water budgeting tool known as Jal Chitra.• Centre for World Solidarity (CWS), a voluntary organization founded as a Public Trust in Andhra Pradesh, focuses on the water-energy-food nexus in optimizing resource use and resilience for farmer communities (Mohan 2012).These participatory initiatives have collectively led to national-level policy changes and programs. In particular, a rebalancing from supply-side to demand-side management with a distinct focus on sustainability, multi-disciplinarity and multidimensionality in water sector institutions, such as the Central Water Commission (CWC) and Central Ground Water Board (CGWB).Source: GoI 2011.Participatory Management and Sustainable Use of Groundwater A Review of the Andhra Pradesh Farmer-Managed Groundwater Systems Project in IndiaThe Andhra Pradesh Farmer-Managed Groundwater Systems (APFAMGS) project 8 is the largest-ever and longest-running community-led participatory groundwater management initiative in India. APFAMGS was implemented between 2003 and 2013 and covered 650 habitations including 6,500 households in seven drought-prone districts (Anantapur, Chittoor, Cuddapah [today referred to as Kadapa], Kurnool, Mahbubnagar, Nalgonda and Prakasam) in the erstwhile state of Andhra Pradesh (Figure 1). 9 Due to its apparent success, principles and practices followed by the project are being integrated into new government programs in India (GoI 2011). A detailed examination of the impacts of the long-term APFAMGS initiative would help inform the discussion on the broader potential of the PGM approach to achieve sustainable use of groundwater. The broad objective of this study is to establish whether PGM, as implemented through APFAMGS, has helped to promote sustainable use and management of groundwater through community empowerment in the form of knowledge sharing, awareness raising and capacity building. The specific objectives of the study are as follows:1. Examine the APFAMGS approach to PGM and evolution of interventions over the entire project duration (2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013).2. Review the performance and efficiency of APFAMGS interventions, during implementation and up to 5 years after project closure, in stabilizing resource availability, building resilience among communities, and distributional (equity-related) impacts at the household level.3. Establish linkages with other existing or potential groundwater management and institutional approaches in India and derive insights for the development of appropriate (sustainable and equitable) resource management policies and strategies going forward.This study builds on earlier assessments of APFAMGS during the implementation phase or immediately following implementation. While the earlier studies could capture the potential impacts more clearly, they could not address the sustainability of the interventions. This study looks at whether the prolonged interventions associated with APFAMGS have helped to usher in sustainable groundwater management practices, which would in turn reduce the pressure on groundwater resources in the area and enhance the sustained socioeconomic benefits to the communities. This outcome could be expected through behavioral and institutional changes that persisted even after the project. The assessment focuses on both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects using a mix of qualitative and quantitative approaches.The hydrogeological impacts were assessed using secondary data collected at the district level. Firsthand information and observations were collected from project villages in two hydrological units (HUs). 10 These HUs were purposively selected as they are situated in the most drought-prone districts of Andhra Pradesh, i.e., Anantapur and Kurnool (for details, see Reddy and Reddy 2020). Besides interacting with village communities in the project areas, engaging with communities of neighboring villages offered counterfactual information. Apart from project documents and evaluation reports, a number of studies have reviewed and assessed the achievements and impacts of APFAMGS over the years (APFAMGS 2006; AFPRO 2007; FAO 2008, 2010; World Bank 2010; Reddy 2012; Verma et al. 2012; Das and Burke 2013; Reddy et al. 2014; Sravanthi et al. 2015). 11 In this case profile, the cumulative and long-term impacts of the project were captured through interviews conducted with the coordinating NGO Bharati Integrated Rural Development Society (BIRDS) and other implementing NGOs. Personal discussions were held with office bearers of APFAMGS and other programs. Also, key informant interviews were conducted with project implementing agencies. This type of firsthand information was gathered from the communities of five villages in two HUs (Upparavanka and Vajralavanka) situated in Peapally Mandal of Kurnool district and Gooty Mandal of Anantapur district. During the field visits, discussions were held with communities and individual farmers from APFAMGS and non-APFAMGS villages following a checklist of enquiries. The study assessed the long-term impacts of the APFAMGS approach and its sustainability in particular focusing on livelihood outcomes and climate vulnerability. Addressing the sustainability aspects over the long term (including after project closure) and the comparison between APFAMGS and non-APFAMGS communities are the value additions of this study. The APFAMGS 'pilot project' facilitated the long-term initiative Andhra Pradesh Drought Mitigation Project (APDMP) funded by the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). IFAD provided a loan of USD 75.5 million with a matching contribution from the state government (total project cost of USD 151.9 million) to implement the project in the same five districts (Anantapur, Chittoor, Cuddapah, Kurnool and Prakasam) for a period of 7 years (IFAD 2016(IFAD , 2017)).Raising awareness and capacity building of communities dependent on groundwater were at the core of the APFAMGS project. Thus, groundwater users, or rather, selected trained volunteers, within each HU were equipped with the necessary equipment, skills and knowledge to support the management of groundwater resources in a sustainable manner. This was mainly done through monitoring and managing demand in light of the seasonally variable water availability. The approach provided the necessary means (equipment and knowledge to collect and analyze rainfall and groundwater data) to increase community understanding of groundwater resources. In the process of capacity building by the representative NGOs, the need to create awareness about water-use efficiency through the adoption of watersaving technologies and agricultural practices was also raised (Box 3).12 Besides PHM, the project provided 3,462 groundwater irrigation facilities to small and marginal well-owning farmers, bringing an additional area of 35,000 acres (approximately 14,150 hectares) under irrigation and covering about 14,000 small and marginal farming families. Farmers were trained to collect the hydrological data on a regular basis. The data were processed and stored for future use. In fact, the data are the property of the communities and may be purchased by researchers and institutions (Reddy et al. 2014). However, the quality of the data was found to be inadequate for the purposes of this study. Awareness building components included the following:• Facilitated discussions on the local groundwater situation in the HU and at the village level.• Demystifying the science of climate and hydrology through farmer water schools.• Introducing the concept of groundwater as a 'common good' and not simply private property.• Carrying out participatory groundwater monitoring and crop water budgeting exercises and sharing this information across the HU. • Providing information to farmers to encourage voluntary adoption of sustainable practices (reduce pumping, water-saving technologies, impacts of drilling new wells, crop diversification, best agrochemical management practices, etc.).Capacity building components included the following:• Farmer water schools adopted an informal and participatory approach to information sharing, group learning, and improving the skills and capacities of farmers. A total of 10,000 farmers attended the 300 farmer water schools and meetings which were organized every 15 days over a period of 5 years in all seven districts. Through these meetings, farmers were able to understand groundwater dynamics in their respective villages and the entire HU. Based on the new understanding, farmers voluntarily adopted appropriate modifications in their agricultural practices with the potential to lead to significant reductions in groundwater use. It must be noted that the farmer water schools were not continued in the latter phases of the project (i.e., after the first 5 years).• PHM is a 'learning by doing' exercise that helps to create 'groundwater literacy'. Farmers were trained at farmer water schools to measure groundwater levels, rainfall, pumping capacity of bore wells and the water requirements for different crops. Fortnightly, water level monitoring was carried out by farmer volunteers (both female and male farmers) in 2,026 observation wells (around one well per square kilometer). Daily rainfall data were collected by farmers from over 190 rain gauge stations (one station per 5 km 2 ). Well discharge measurements were carried out by farmers in over 700 observation wells to assess the pumping capacity of the wells, well performance, etc. To become a PHM volunteer, farmers had to undergo training (covering four modules) at the farmer water schools, and only the successful candidates were eligible to become volunteers (unpaid). These volunteers were then provided with the necessary measurement tools, such as electrical water level indicator, stopwatch, calibrated bucket, etc. Hydrological monitoring records were maintained and exhibited for public viewing on display boards at strategic locations within the village. Additionally, seasonal groundwater quality monitoring (analyzing 16 parameters related to drinking water quality) was carried out in public drinking water wells and the results were displayed in public places in the village. In fact, these data are cleaned and digitized for future use and made available to others on a commercial basis. 12• Crop water budgeting is a technical exercise where farmers collectively make their crop plans each season based on water availability (groundwater for cropping and irrigation in both dry and wet seasons). The project did not advocate changes to the crops being cultivated and did not want to limit the crop choices available to farmers in a particular HU. Instead, the emphasis was on improving water-use efficiency. It was assumed that farmers have sufficient knowledge of crop management practices and markets to be able to make relevant decisions.• Groundwater management committees (GMCs) and hydrological unit networks (HUNs) were established at the village and HU levels, respectively. These institutions met regularly to discuss various aspects of groundwater and were able to advise farmers on changes to crop pattern and other practices.• Water-saving technologies, such as micro-irrigation, were promoted by linking with the government subsidy programs. State and central governments provide a subsidy on sprinkler and drip irrigation (75% to 90%). Despite the high subsidy, only large farmers could afford and avail the subsidy due to high capital costs of the irrigation systems. This in turn resulted in inequity in access to and adoption of the technology.• No formal or informal regulation mechanisms were put in place. No separate project-derived subsidies to promote the adoption of demand management approaches or groundwater use regulations (e.g., restrictions on the area under water-intensive crops, construction of new bore wells, etc.) through official or social controls were implemented.Participatory Management and Sustainable Use of Groundwater A Review of the Andhra Pradesh Farmer-Managed Groundwater Systems Project in IndiaThe APFAMGS districts are predominantly underlain by variably weathered granitic basement rocks with groundwater found predominantly under unconfined conditions (Garduño et al. 2009). The extent and productivity of the groundwater resources of these crystalline rocks are determined by inherent factors that include weathering depth, clay content and degree of fracturing. In favorable geomorphological settings, weathering and fracturing processes allow continuous relatively productive aquifers typically up to 25 meters thick in topographic lows. In less favorable settings, aquifers are thin and patchy and not very productive. Annual average rainfall ranges from 600 to 1,000 mm and is concentrated almost entirely within the monsoon season from around June to October. Rainfall amount, its intensity (Asoka et al. 2018), topography, soil infiltrability, and any catchment management and 'rainwater harvesting' 13 initiatives are key factors in the replenishment of groundwater resources.In order to gain a degree of clarity on the linkages between groundwater resources and APFAMGS interventions, the most extensive groundwater monitoring data provided by CGWB were used. These data were from the five of the seven APFAMGS districts (Anantapur, Chittoor, Cuddapah, Kurnool and Prakasam), which were situated within the recently redefined state of Andhra Pradesh. The dataset covers an 18-year period between 1999-2000 and 2016-2017. Given that APFAMGS interventions were limited to areas outside of major surface water irrigation commands, only data from noncommand (i.e., groundwater-irrigated) areas 14 are presented.The aggregate groundwater situation across the APFAMGS districts has not improved. In fact, groundwater levels have deteriorated overall, with an average decline of about 0.2 m per year in the pre-monsoon 3-year moving average assessment (Figure 2). Moving average values for rainfall reveal a decreasing trend up to around 2004, followed by a brief increasing trend up to around 2007 and, finally, a longer decreasing trend up to 2017. Over these periods, both pre-and post-monsoon groundwater levels show similar sequential decreasing, increasing and decreasing trends. The consistent correlation between the filtered annual rainfall and filtered groundwater levels suggests that climate and rainfall-derived recharge have an important control on groundwater storage. This indicates that the impact of changes in groundwater recharge or pumping due to APFAMGS interventions has not had an overriding effect on the expected natural larger-scale rainfall-recharge pattern.The number of wells in Andhra Pradesh (before the Reorganization Act, 2014) increased from 0.8 million (0.7 million dug wells and 0.1 million bore wells) in 1971 to about 2.2 million (1.0 million dug wells and 1.2 million bore wells) 15 by 2007 (GoI n.d.;GoI 1995;GoAP 2002GoAP , 2006aGoAP , 2006bGoAP , 2008aGoAP , 2008b)). The area under groundwater irrigation increased from 0.8 million hectares (Mha) to about 2.8 Mha over the same period (predominantly in rain-fed areas and not involving the replacement of surface irrigation). The area irrigated per well was almost constant, but water was drawn from greater depths as wells were deepened in response to falling groundwater levels (Reddy et al. 2016). The average density of actively operating wells in the state increased from five wells per square kilometer to 10 wells per square kilometer over the period from 1984 to 2007. 16 However, in hard rock areas, characteristic of the APFAMGS districts, the figure was over 20 wells per square kilometer, and in some pockets, it was as high as 100 wells per square kilometer, indicating the high reliance on groundwater in the APFAMGS areas. Reddy et al. (2016) showed that average groundwater levels declined rapidly in these highly developed local areas.13 Rainwater harvesting and catchment management techniques strive to capture rainfall and maximize its retention in the subsurface (soil and groundwater) for ecosystem and human benefits, especially for agriculture (rain-fed or irrigated) (Sikka et al. 2018).14 Non-command areas account for about 25% of the net sown area at the aggregate level. Within the non-command areas, coverage of APFAMGS interventions account for less than 10% of the area. 15 The number of wells for both years include functional and nonfunctional wells. ;GoI 1995;GoAP 2002GoAP , 2006aGoAP , 2006bGoAP , 2008aGoAP , 2008b;;GoAP and GoI 2011a, 2011b, 2012a, 2012b). For the later years, data are compiled from the Office of the Director, Department of Ground Water, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India. (ii) Rainfall data: GoAP (2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015) and GoAP (2016GoAP ( -2018)). 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 5 2 0 0 6 2 0 0 7 2 0 0 8 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 2 0 1 7 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 5 2 0 0 6 2 0 0 7 2 0 0 8 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 2 0 1 7Annual rainfall (mm) Over the period from 1985 to 2016, rates of groundwater pumping for irrigation in the five districts, analyzed and as an aggregate across shallow and deep wells, increased dramatically, with the largest increases evident over the period between 1993 and 2002 (Figure 3). Since about 2002, the quantities of groundwater pumped have stabilized and, if at all, decreased in subsequent years. This decrease is potentially due to the decreasing trend in rainfall since 2008, which includes recent droughts in 2014-2015 and 2016-2017 that have reduced well yields as a result of poor groundwater recharge. Despite the extended drought conditions, the number and depth of wells have continued to increase. Data source : GoI n.d.;GoI 1995;GoAP 2002GoAP , 2006aGoAP , 2006bGoAP , 2008aGoAP , 2008b;;GoAP and GoI 2011a, 2011b, 2012a, 2012b). For the later years, data are compiled from the Office of the Director, Department of Groundwater, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India.The available HU-level assessments in the APFAMGS areas do not provide a clear indication of an improvement in the groundwater situation. An independent study covering the period 2005-2008 identified that groundwater pumping had decreased only in 24 of the 63 HUs (Garduño et al. 2009). Another study examining the period from 2006 to 2011 noted a 20% or more decrease in groundwater pumping at 17 of the 63 HUs (Das and Burke 2013). The decrease in groundwater pumping was attributed to above-average rainfall over the period considered and not due to APFAMGS interventions. A groundwater balance analysis for the same period (2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011) showed that 56 of the 63 HUs remained in a so-called 'nonsafe' state of groundwater development, indicating that abstraction exceeds 70% of recharge (as per CGWB protocols). Thus, evidence of the hydrological impact of APFAMGS interventions suggests that the project had insignificant influence within the respective HUs. Finally, a farm-level study conducted across five villages in Nalgonda district in 2014 showed no significant difference in groundwater use between APFAMGs and non-APFAMGS areas (Sravanthi et al. 2015). 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 Groundwater availability has a direct bearing on the areas under kharif paddy cultivation (July to November) and rabi cropping (December to March). Crop water budgeting helped farmers understand the constraints to water availability and the effects of highly water-intensive paddy cultivation. Farmers' experiences showed that they incur crop and hence income losses when they do not follow the collective advice, i.e., reduce the area under water-intensive crops due to seasonal water shortages. Having knowledge of the constraints to groundwater availability faced by farmers prior to the cropping season in the project areas prompted the GMCs and HUNs to develop crop plans that addressed issues related to water use. This was directly attributable to APFAMGS interventions. Interestingly, the shift away from paddy to the cultivation of less water-intensive crops did not trigger the expansion of the area under irrigation. As mentioned earlier, the increase in the number of wells was due to decreasing groundwater levels rather than changes in cropping patterns.Farmers have started to diversify cropping by shifting from paddy to alternative crops, i.e., pulses, oil seeds, fruits, vegetables, flowers, etc. This is in response to water stress and to also make the best use of available soil moisture (Garduño et al. 2009). 17 Market conditions for some of the crops (e.g., fruits, vegetables) have helped improve household income. A comparative assessment highlighted that APFAMGS villages were more resilient to climate-related risks than neighboring non-APFAMGS villages. For instance, investments in new wells and well deepening in the non-APFAMGS villages only occurred in the latter years of the project. Similarly, adoption of micro-irrigation is higher in APFAMGS villages (Reddy and Reddy 2020). Thus, evolving farmer practices could be attributed largely to APFAMGS interventions.New government programs or initiatives are prioritizing APFAMGS villages due to the communities' higher capacities and awareness coupled with stronger community institutions, such as GMCs, guaranteeing better outcomes and more efficient use of resources. The concentration of follow-up programs in the APFAMGS villages after 2013 has helped to enhance the impacts of the project. After project closure, the state of Andhra Pradesh continued to include APFAMGS approaches under different projects (Box 2), which also covered most of the APFAMGS villages. These new initiatives are scheduled to continue until 2025 (IFAD 2017). The more recent projects strive to promote sustainable groundwater use and management following the principles and practices of APFAMGS and could, therefore, be considered as follow-up projects. Besides continuing the earlier initiatives, these projects have helped to increase awareness among the communities and improve other practices, such as multiple/mixed cropping, critical irrigation, 18 mulching, and the use of chemical fertilizers, manure (vermicompost) and other natural inputs. Crop diversification has been spreading fast throughout the region in recent years due to increased water stress and favorable market prices for nontraditional horticultural and other crops, coupled with unfavorable market prices for traditional crops, such as groundnut. These crop diversification practices have helped farmers to stabilize or increase their yields and incomes and are likely to be sustained given the continued water stress and market conditions. In essence, farmers under APFAMGS have been capacitated in maximizing the agricultural output (crop yields and incomes) per unit of groundwater available on their farms, while not reducing overall use of the resource.There is a firm basis for concluding that behavioral change among the communities in using and managing groundwater is a result of the project interventions and other contextual circumstances. Realization of the concept of sustainable groundwater use came earlier and to a higher degree in the APFAMGS villages than in other villages. Without the continuation of APFAMGS interventions after project closure and the favorable market conditions, these behavioral changes would likely not have taken place. The recent developments fostered through follow-up interventions (Box 2) have helped farmers to be aware and use the knowledge gained systematically. In some of these villages, farmers continue to make crop plans informally by applying the knowledge they gained from APFAMGS, even without collecting additional data. While these communities have the advantage of continued external support, no formal institutional arrangements are pursued, e.g., integrating GMCs with WUAs, giving WUA status to GMCs, or linking GMCs to the state groundwater department. The more recent APDMP being implemented by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, through the line departments, has identified PGM as a best practice. However, there is a need to link the existingParticipatory Management and Sustainable Use of Groundwater A Review of the Andhra Pradesh Farmer-Managed Groundwater Systems Project in India informal community institutions to a formal structure with provision for funding, in order to protect the institutional network at the village level (social capital) and the groundwater support systems (natural capital) created in the region. At the same time, the new projects, while scaling out the initiatives, need to include all the APFAMGS villages in the program with an adapted set of interventions. The interventions could be in the form of updating the technical information from the field and keeping the communities informed, and creating motivation for adopting PGM.The 'do it yourself' approach with enhanced scientific knowledge has improved the awareness of well owners. This has increased resource-use efficiency but has not translated into sustainable groundwater use at any level -household, village or district -over the time frame assessed. This could be due to the absence of formal or informal regulations and collective initiatives, such as increased investments in managed aquifer recharge structures or sharing of water. This has resulted in perpetuating inequity, especially during drought years when groundwater levels tend to be deeper (Reddy et al. 2014).Marginal and small farmers are the first to be impacted by groundwater depletion as they have shallower bore wells compared to large farmers, and this affects their water availability for both domestic use and farming. Due to the lack of access to water, poor farmers are the first to quit farming in search of alternative income-generating activities (Reddy et al. 2020). In the absence of any tangible improvement in the groundwater situation, and since the project only focuses on farmers owning wells, APFAMGS interventions have failed to achieve equitable outcomes for all farmers.More sustainable and equitable outcomes would require long-term support and formal linkages with relevant line agencies, such as the state groundwater department. Informal peer pressure from fellow farmers, convinced about the gains from sustainable groundwater management practices, did not work in the post-project period in the absence of any social or economic regulations. Moreover, since the APFAMGS approach does not include all farmers, the information-based awareness failed to reach the majority of farmers. This was because less than 50% of farmers in the region own a well, and was also due to the absence of water markets or water sharing arrangements (Reddy et al. 2016). This has an adverse impact on the sustainability of the approach, as the limited membership hinders the collective ownership and commitment to the common good, i.e., groundwater. Also, in the absence of any tangible benefits to farmers who do not own a well, they lack the incentive to support broader activities, such as rainwater harvesting.Some of the initiatives in Andhra Pradesh after APFAMGS project closure have integrated the knowledge-based approach with social regulation. These interventions include the Social Regulations in Water Management (SRWM) by the Centre for World Solidarity (CWS), and the Andhra Pradesh Drought Adaptation Initiative (APDAI) by the Watershed Support Services and Activities Network (WASSAN) (Reddy et al. 2014). Though awareness building and data generation by the village communities were important components, the process was not adequate as evident from the issues of quality of data and its organization. The most important aspect of these two new initiatives (SRWM and APDAI) was to bring consensus among the communities to share water between well owners and non-well owners to protect their crops, especially during periods of highest water stress. Social regulations were put in place and included restrictions on the construction of new wells, and provision of protective irrigation to the plots of well owners and non-well owners through the irrigation backup 19 they receive in the event of failure of the groundwater well. Further, water losses during distribution were reduced by using sealed pipeline supply rather than open channels, and water-use efficiency was increased through the promotion of micro-irrigation at subsidized prices. Similar PGM approaches were implemented by two NGOs in Chittoor district of Andhra Pradesh -Foundation for Ecological Security (FES) and Jana Jagriti (JJ) -where awareness, regulation and incentives are combined. A recent study assessing the FES/JJ approach identified that groundwater management improves with increasing community awareness (knowledge about cropping patterns and the linkages to groundwater use) and social capital (where participants consider group gains) (Meinzen-Dick et al. 2016).In all three initiatives (SRWM, APDAI and FES/JJ), social regulations had a clear effect in stopping the construction of new bore wells and helped a larger number of households, especially the marginal and small farmers, to benefit from sharing water with well owners (Reddy et al. 2014). This has led to increases in the cropped area under protective irrigation, thus minimizing crop losses. This also resulted in equity in the distribution of water and overall welfare improvement that could enhance drought resilience. The success of these initiatives is mainly due to the commitment and effort of NGO partners in the absence of any contribution from the farmers towards irrigation infrastructure (pipelines, micro-irrigation, etc.).Communities are often lured by the incentives (subsidies for micro-irrigation and pipelines) rather than their ownership of the interventions and commitment to sustainable groundwater management. (f)This assessment clearly highlights that the PGM approach of APFAMGS has neither resulted in an improvement in the groundwater situation nor promoted sustainable groundwater management practices in the majority of HUs at the district level. The weight of evidence indicates that the APFAMGS approach has a positive influence on behavioral changes due to increased knowledge of groundwater among farmers that may bring about more efficient use of the resource and better and more secure crop production. This may have reduced overall pumping in project areas and slowed groundwater level declines, but the effect appears at best limited or localized. However, the approach falls short on goals of equity due to limitations associated with inclusiveness, incentives and social regulations. Recent experience from Andhra Pradesh with more integrated approaches indicates that knowledge creation together with regulations/incentives are required to make PGM effective in addressing increasing food demand and climate-related vulnerabilities in more equitable ways. Further, the role of women in the process needs further strengthening, as they play a significant role in farming, especially in the context of climate-induced crop pattern changes. In this regard, ensuring women's participation in village-level GMCs would help address gender-sensitive aspects of groundwater management. While incentives require a top-down approach (government providing necessary capital support, subsidies, agricultural pricing, etc.), social regulatory mechanisms should evolve from within the community. The experience so far indicates that the design of the approach needs to consider local needs in order to make it effective and suitable for scaling out. PGM is being scaled up at the national level in seven states under a new program Atal Bhujal Yojana with a focus on institutional strengthening and capacity building. This program has an estimated budget of USD 860 million with a matching contribution of USD 430 million from the World Bank over a period of 5 years (2020-2021 to 2024-2025) (GoI 2020b).This study raises the larger question of 'how participatory are participatory initiatives?' This needs to be understood in the changing socioeconomic and climatic context and community perceptions, i.e., participation is no longer viewed as a solidary activity by communities. Unless there are substantial economic gains to be made, proactive participation is difficult to materialize (Mansuri and Rao 2013). More importantly, factors related to political economy, which may include elite capture, regulatory capture, political discrimination or favoritism, etc., come to the fore as these initiatives expand. Social regulation is a difficult proposition in nonuniform communities, where politics and the common good may disconnect (Reddy et al. 2014). At the same time, it is also difficult to encourage farmers with larger landholdings, who are also politically more influential, to give up their higher degree of control on groundwater due to the awareness created.Externally induced participation is unlikely to be sustainable in the absence of sustained tangible benefits and policy-backed incentive and regulatory mechanisms. While improving communities' awareness and knowledge about groundwater is a necessary precondition, it is not sufficient to make communities engage over the long term. Policy and legal support systems are required to ensure enhanced benefits and equity in their distribution. These include addressing the policy distortions in resource pricing (water and energy), output prices that favor water-intensive crops 20 and clearly defined property rights in order to make groundwater serve as a common-pool resource. When adopting and improving PGM-based initiatives such as APFAMGS on a wider scale, state governments need to consider the following aspects:• Initiatives towards increasing the community's awareness and knowledge about groundwater by adopting scientific approaches with location-specific attributes is a precondition for improving the efficient use of the resource. However, it may not improve the groundwater situation over the long term, especially with continuing climate change.• Integrating top-down incentive structures and bottom-up social regulatory mechanisms together with awareness building is likely to be effective in the short to medium term. These include price incentives for less water-intensive rain-fed crops, price stabilization (lowering price risk) for horticultural crops, pricing of water and energy by treating them as economic goods, and regulating groundwater pumping through community-based approaches, etc.• Pricing policies still favor water-intensive crops, such as paddy, sugarcane and wheat. 21 These policies, complemented by free or subsidized power and water pricing policies, act firmly against the policy objective of sustainable groundwater management. • 20 Rice is still a preferred crop due to better market conditions. Only water scarcity can deter farmers from growing rice. 21 Though 14 crops are listed in the minimum support price policy, effective implementation is enforced only for paddy, sugarcane and wheat (Reddy and Chiranjeevi 2016).Participatory Management and Sustainable Use of Groundwater A Review of the Andhra Pradesh Farmer-Managed Groundwater Systems Project in India• Linking community-based institutions (e.g., GMCs) and existing administrative institutions (e.g., groundwater/ irrigation departments) with funds, functions and functionaries that could help sustain PGM initiatives. In this case, state government departments can take the lead in promoting and supporting the community actions at the local level.• In the long run, ensuring equity in access to groundwater among farmers will require policy changes that recognize groundwater as a common resource. This calls for changing the property rights regimes and moving towards delinking land and groundwater rights. ","tokenCount":"6747"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1749816484.json b/data/part_2/1749816484.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e78b0281a7ac6da49deb5036ee36a119f093cd1d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1749816484.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6f3fca42b8a7f47080699dd91e1cf449","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/37380bcf-ccaf-42c2-9584-d1b0045778df/retrieve","id":"227512941"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"0b6b26cd-c280-4236-ac8f-eee4c059849a","pagecount":"36","content":"The Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) delivers research-based solutions that address the global crises of malnutrition, climate change, biodiversity loss, and environmental degradation.The Alliance focuses on the nexus of agriculture, nutrition and environment. We work with local, national, and multinational partners across Africa, Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean, and with the public and private sectors and civil society. With novel partnerships, the Alliance generates evidence and mainstreams innovations to transform food systems and landscapes so that they sustain the planet, drive prosperity, and nourish people in a climate crisis.The Alliance is part of CGIAR, a global research partnership for a food-secure future dedicated to reducing poverty, enhancing food and nutrition security, and improving natural resources. www.alliancebioversityciat.org www.cgiar.org CGIAR is a global research partnership for a food-secure future. CGIAR science is dedicated to reducing poverty, enhancing food and nutrition security, and improving natural resources and ecosystem services. Its research is carried out by 15 CGIAR Centers in close collaboration with hundreds of partners, including national and regional research institutes, civil society organizations, academia, development organizations, and the private sector.. Reasons for and levels of farmers' appreciation of improved forage varieties distributed under the project - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Figure 7.Figure 10. Distribution of forage varieties for on-farm monitoring among the beneficiary farmers across four counties in Kenya - ------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tables Table 1. Peer-farmer facilitators conducting on-farm data collection - -------------------------------------Table 2: Levels of appreciation for forage varieties by beneficiary farmers. ---------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------1. IntroductionIn the coming 30 years, the global population is expected to increase by 2 billion, from 7.7 billion to an estimated 9.7 billion people. Sub-Saharan Africa's population is projected to double by 2050 (United Nations, 2019). With this population increase, the consumption of milk and meat products will exceed supply (Miruka et al., 2012). To ensure there is a balance between demand and supply there is need to increase output of animal products. This is especially important since meat and milk are essential sources of protein. Moreover, livestock production provides direct and indirect employment, contributing 12% to Kenya's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and 40% of the agricultural GDP (Behnke and Muthama, 2011). However, livestock production is constrained by inadequate livestock feeds (Herrero et al., 2013). The sector is characterized by a heavy dependence on rainfed agriculture for pasture growth, resulting in insufficient fodder for livestock, particularly during dry seasons (Ouda et al., 2005). Despite a wealth of research that has resulted in improved forage varieties that have demonstrated the potential to provide highly-nutritious animal feed, translating research station production levels of these forage grasses to the farm level has proven to be challenging. Improved pasture technologies are tested and developed mainly on research stations, within the confines of homogeneous, researcher-controlled environments, with little consideration of the heterogeneity that is present in farmers' fields (Vanlauwe et al., 2016). Giller et al. (2011) established that heterogeneity of socio-economic and agroecological production environments on smallholder farms has a direct impact on crop production. However, research, which includes forage agronomy, has often over-emphasized and focused on single factors, ignoring important aspects of variability such as soil, climate and farm management (Shallow et al., 2018). This may explain why technologies do not perform as well as expected once they are introduced into farmers' fields. Heterogeneity increases the variability of technology performance, especially in on-farm settings, thus discouraging farmers and limiting its adoption (Melesse, 2018). In contrast with traditional recommendations that are based on on-station trials, our study contributes to tailoring and scaling forage agronomy. Scaling-up agronomy requires consistent data -on how forages are affected by a variety of soils and different management strategies -generated from multiple locations across extensive study sites (Paul et al., 2020). On the other hand, participatory research -in which participating farmers are an integral part of the research process, making key decisions as individuals (Paul et al., 2016) -is considered more empowering, and therefore increases technology adaptation and ultimately adoption. The aim of this study was therefore to understand how on-farm heterogeneity affects Panicum and Brachiaria grass yields -for livestock rearing and income generation -when cultivated in onfarm conditions compared to its performance when cultivated at a research station in western Kenya.Dennis Nyongesa and his wife have boosted their farm's milk yield and income since using the new forage grass varieties introduced by the Grass2Cash project together with KALRO, Send a Cow and Advantage Crops. Georgina Smith/ Alliance of Bioversity International and CIATThe Grass2Cash project distributed a mixture of seed of two Panicum Grass varieties (P. maximum, Mombasa and P. maximum, Tanzania) and three Brachiaria Grass varieties (Cayman, Mulato II and Xaraes) to more than 1000 farmers within four counties of western Kenya, namely Busia, Kakamega, Bungoma and Siaya, between October 2020 and May 2021.Of the 1000 initial forage seed beneficiaries, a survey was conducted among 480 farmers who had received and planted seeds between July and September 2019 -as this was considered a suitable period to allow optimal forage plot establishment and for the farmers to gain experience in managing and harvesting the crop. These 480 farmers also received initial farmer-to-farmer training on planting and management of forages from peer farmers involved in activities being conducted in the region by the UK NGO, Send a Cow. The survey enabled the project to gauge the rate of establishment, quality and management of the forage plots, forage utilization among the farmer beneficiaries across all four counties and to select 169 farmers to participate in on-farm monitoring of forage plots across all four counties. Through the survey, participating farmers were selected based on whether they had:• received forage seed planting material from CIAT• an established a forage plot at the time the survey was conducted • planted the forages as a plot (not as a contour or boundary)• a forage plot planted as a mono-crop (not intercropped)• a performance score of >40% (from average to very good) during the survey evaluation, thus excluding poor to very poor performance.Farmers with plots that were planted in strips, intercropped or were performing poorly were eliminated from the selection process. Data was obtained from each of the participating farmers' forage plots, specifically from two randomly measured quadrats, each measuring one square meter (Figure 1). Soil samples were collected at a depth of 0-20 cm using simple random sampling. A composite mixture was obtained by mixing samples from different cores. The sample was then air-dried, crushed, mixed thoroughly and sieved using a 2 mm sieve and analyzed for pH, total organic carbon, phosphorous and nitrogen, using procedures established by Okalebo et al. (2002).Throughout the survey and on-farm monitoring, data were collected and recorded using Open Data Kit (ODK). Enumerators were trained in the use of ODK, including recording and submitting data, and on how to administer the survey questions to farmers. On-farm monitoring and data collection was conducted by 12 trained peer-farmers from Send a Cow who were responsible for following-up with participating farmers (Table 1) every six weeks during the recording of agronomic data; however, they were not responsible for instructing farmers in plot management practices. Farmers made independent decisions on how best to manage their forage plots. Since the plots were at different stages of growth when on-farm monitoring commenced, standardization of forage plots following specific harvesting or cutting times was essential; accordingly, the first harvest (H1) took place in October, the second (H2) in November 2020 (during the short-rains period of September-December), the third (H3) in January 2021, the fourth (H4) in February 2021, and both H3 and H4 during the drier seasons of January-March. Harvests five (H5) and six (H6) were conducted in April and May 2021, respectively, both during the long rains (April-June). Plant height was determined by measuring five plants in each of the two selected quadrats at six-week intervals (at weeks 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36). Fresh weight was determined by forage samples harvested in the quadrat (Figure 2); dry matter weight was obtained through the difference between sample fresh weights, sample dry weight and conversion using the dry matter percentage. Agronomic data on type of manure, frequency of manure application, rate of manure application, type of fertilizer, frequency of fertilizer application, rate of fertilizer application, weeding method and weeding frequency were determined by administering a structured questionnaire to farmers. Plant height average was determined by variety across harvests in all four counties. Fresh weight averages of the two quadrats per plot was determined in each county per variety across all harvests. Extrapolation enabled expressing yield into t/ha. Dry matter percentage was used to express fresh weight into dry weight. To determine the dry matter percentage, the differences between fresh sample weight and sample dry weight was determined and expressed as a percentage calculated using the formulas below:Dry matter percentage = (Fresh weight-Dry weight)*100%Conversion of fresh weight into dry matter:Dry matter (t/ha=Fresh weight t/ha*Dry matter percentage)To relate on-farm yields against soil properties in various sites across different harvests, analysis of repeated measures was conducted as illustrated:Whereby: Y=Dependent variable, U=Means, ai=County, bj=Variety, abij=County*Variety interaction, Eij= Error term.a. Out of 480 farmers selected for survey, only 400 (83.3%) could be surveyed, due to several factors: some farmers were listed twice in the initial list of beneficiaries as they received various varieties, while most of those we eliminated were untraceable since they had either moved away or died in the past year or were not known by the peer farmer.b. Out of these 400 farmers, 391 farmers (97.5%) confirmed they had received seeds in 2019 from Send a Cow peer farmers. The number of interviewed farmers who received seeds across the sites differed.In Busia County, 99 farmers (100%) received seeds, followed by 100 farmers (99.1%) in Bungoma, 123 farmers (98.4%) in Kakamega County, and lastly 69 farmers (93.2%) in Siaya.c. Out of the total 391 seed beneficiaries, 38.5% received Tanzania variety, 28% Mombasa, 11.7% Cayman, 10.2% Mulato II, 0.7% Masaai, 0.4% Cobra, 8.5% Xaraes, 0.7% Basilisk, 0.2% Piata, while none received Mg4 variety (Figure 3). Of these farmers, 97.4% had received some form of training from peer farmers, while 2.6% had received no training. The average plot owned by farmers in the survey was 2.3 acres.A total of 425 entries were recorded in the database, since some farmers planted more than one variety of forage, each of which was considered as a separate entry during data analysis. Among the 391 farmers who confirmed receiving seeds in 2019, only 360 farmers (92.3.7%) planted the seed received. Reasons highlighted by the remaining 31 farmers (7.7%) for failure to plant ranged from misplacing the seeds, safeguarding the seeds in the house, social issues, climatic factors such as lack of rain, and inadequate land on which to establish a forage plot. The majority of farmers planted the seeds between July and September 2019. Some farmers waited for the short rains in October and November to plant, while others waited for the dry season between February and March 2020 and in April 2020 (at the start of the long rains), the latter group attributing this choice to inadequate rainfall that discourages the establishment of forage plots. Forage varieties:At the time of the survey, of the 391 farmers who had received seeds and of the 360 who had planted them, only 291 (80.83%) had well-established, well-tended forage plots, while 69 (19.16%) plots were absent, indicating that the farmers who had planted the seeds received had not been able to establish forage plots (Figure 4). Contributing factors to the absence of plots included:- Survey results indicate that 91.5% of farmers preferred hand-digging tillage to prepare the land before planting. Only 3.1% used an oxen-drawn plough, while 5.2% combined hand hoes and oxploughs to prepare land for planting. The highest percentage (39.8%) of the sampled farmers weeded their plots three times, while 22.1% weeded more than five times. Farmers who weeded 1-2 times and 4-5 times accounted for 17.3% and 18%, respectively. Only 2.8% of farmers never weeded their plots. Twenty-three per cent of surveyed farmers reported harvesting more than 5 times and 20% reported harvesting 4-5 times. Almost 18% harvested less than twice, while 4% reported never harvesting forages from their plots. Kakamega County had the highest number of farmers (38.9%) harvesting their forage plots 3-4 times, which is similar to the numbers in Bungoma (36.2%). In contrast, most of the farmers in Busia (29%) reported harvesting more than 5 times. In Siaya, farmers harvested 1-2 times or 3-4 times, both of which represent 33% of the farmer beneficiaries with plots.The majority of farmers receiving forage varieties were highly satisfied with the forage seeds received and scored them highly when asked about their appreciation of materials received (see Table 2).Table 2: Level of appreciation for forage varieties by beneficiary farmers. On a scale of 1-5, the highest percentage of farmers (51.1%) assigned an average rating of four out of five to the improved varieties of forage grasses, followed by 29.6% of farmers who assigned a top score of five; 16.2% of farmers scored them at three out of five, 1.7% scored them at two, and the lowest percentage of farmers (1.4%) scored them at one out of five. As an observation, most of the farmers who scored the forages at either one or two out of five either never harvested the grasses or felt discouraged after poor germination.Among the grass varieties distributed, Tanzania and Mombasa were mostly appreciated for their high yields, increased milk production and palatability. Brachiaria varieties, including Xaraes, Mulato II and Cayman, were highly appreciated since they are easy to handle and regrow quickly after cutting (Figure 6). Farmers often gave more than one reason for prefering the forage variety, among which the most common reasons were a combination of: high yield, palatability for cows, increased milk production, fast regrowth after cutting, higher yields and resistance to pests. More than half of the farmers attributed their varietal preference to income generation for the household as a result of increased milk production, with enough milk for the family and for the sale of surplus milk.Figure 7 presents the farmers' overall trait preferences. Good palatability for cows was ranked highest by 74.9% of farmers; increased milk production was reported by 64.4% of farmers; 54.3% appreciated the forages for fast regrowth after cutting; manageability was appreciated by 48% of the farmers who indicated the grasses were soft and easy to cut; 41.9% reported high yields, while resistance to pests and drought were reported by 28.86% and 18.2%, respectively. On average, each participating farmer had a plot size of approximately 197.2 m 2 . Two-hundred and seventy-two farmers (93.4%) had planted forage plots in one area/plot. This means that the forage plot was not established as a contour or a strip. 80.4% of farmers had established the forage plots as monocrops, while 15.8% mixed the forages with other crop species on the same plot; and 3.4% intercropped the forage plot with beans, sweet potatoes, cassavas and bananas.The large majority of farmers (86%) indicated that they use the harvested forages to feed their own cows, while 6% used the forages to feed cows that did not belong to them (Figure 8). A further 14% reported selling the forages for income, most of whom sold the surplus forages after feeding their livestock. Very few farmers sold the whole harvest for financial gain, with the exception of farmers who had no cows and therefore no need to keep the grass as fodder.Performance of the forage varieties distributed among farmers in the four Kenyan counties was assessed, ranging from 'Poor' (10-30%), 'Average' (40-50%), and 'Good' (60-80%) and 'Very Good' (90-100%) (Figure 9). Busia County had the best-performing forages, as assessed by the enumerator. The total percentage of 'Very Good' performing forages across the four counties was only 13%, while the poorest performing accounted for 14% of the forages. The largest number of forage varieties (41.6%) showed 'Good' performance, followed by 30.2% of the forage varieties showing an 'Average' performance. Forage performance was also linked to maintenance of the forage plots (see section 3.2.3) and was a key indicator of how well farmers had been managing the forage plot. It was further used as a selection criteria for the distribution of forages for on-farm monitoring (Figure 10) Additionally, Panicum maximum grass thrives in soils that are well drained and fertile (Alves & Xavier, 1986). None of the three Brachiaria spp. varieties Cayman, Mulato II and Xaraes showed significant differences in plant height. While Mulato II reached the highest plant height among the three, it was on a declining trend from harvest 2 to harvest 5. The lowest recorded plant heights were reached in harvest 4 due to the drought conditions experienced in January and February 2020, hence slowing the regrowth vigour. Most of the western Kenya region experiences bimodal inter-seasonal rainfall patterns, with long rains from March to May and short rains from October to December. However, in the recent past, precipitation has become more erratic leading to prolonged dry conditions at certain times of the year (Herrmann & Mohr, 2011). The drier seasons of the year present unfavourable conditions for pasture and fodder growth. Mombasa and Tanzania varieties planted by Busia County farmers were recorded as having the highest plant height compared to all the other three counties; however, there was an insignificant difference between Mombasa and Tanzania across the county. The highest plant heights across all the harvests and all varieties were recorded in Busia County. Accumulated dry matter yields by forage variety is shown in Figure 13 and across harvests in Figure 14. Mombasa variety produced the highest dry matter content among Guinea Grass species and all other forages with cumulative dry matter of 1.5 t/ ha. Panicum maximum species have often been considered good alternatives to Napier or Elephant grass, due to their high-yielding nature and vibrant regrowth after cutting (Munyasi et al., 2015). However, there was insignificant difference between dry matter yield of Guinea grass varieties Mombasa and Tanzania and the Brachiaria grass Xaraes, yielding 1.4 t/ha, 1.3 t/ha and 1.3 t/ ha of dry matter, respectively. Dry matter content in Mulato II (0.95 t/ha) was higher than that of Cayman (0.6 t/ ha). In Busia County, Mombasa yielded 2.8 t/ ha dry matter, the highest dry matter accumulation among the five forage varieties planted in the county. This was in significant contrast with Tanzania that produced 1.8 t/ha dry matter in the same county. Among the Brachiaria grasses, within Busia County, Mulato II performed better with a dry matter count of 1.5 t/ha compared to Cayman (0.9 t/ha). In Bungoma, Brachiaria Cayman accumulated 1.4 t/ha dry matter in six cuttings, while Mombasa yielded 1.3 t/ha of dry matter. Mulato II accumulated 0.8 t/ha of dry matter, which was slightly lower than Xaraes at 1.2 t/ha. In Siaya, Guinea grasses generally performed better than the Brachiaria. Mombasa and Tanzania varieties showed insignificant differences in dry matter yields, producing 0.96t/ha and 0.97 t/ha, respectively. Cayman was the better-performing variety among the Brachiaria grasses yielding 0.48 t/ha compared to Xaraes, which yielded 0.46 t/ha dry matter. The tillering ability of Brachiaria species supports their survival under drought conditions and the accumulation of high dry matter content (Ondiko et al., 2016). This may explain why Brachiaria grass varieties were able to adapt well in Siaya county, despite its drier conditions. However, in Siaya, none of the participating farmers planted Mulato II. Weeding is a key agronomic practice on forage plots (Figure 15). To maximise production, weeding should be combined with occasional replenishment of nutrients by applying fertiliser and manure, and managing pests and diseases (Iqbal, 2015). In Bungoma, farmers who weeded at least once obtained better yields than those who did not weed at all. On average, most farmers across all four counties did not weed during the six-week data collection interval across all harvesting seasons. In Kakamega County, for instance, only 9.3% of farmers had weeded during the entire two seasons while 90.6% percent had not weeded at all. Among these, those who weeded at least once during each harvesting season had better dry matter production at 1.6 t/ha compared to 0.9 t/ha produced by farmers who had not weeded (Figure 16). Farmers who applied manure to their plots at least once after each cutting season had better yielding forage plots than those who did not apply manure (Figure 17). In Kakamega County, those who applied manure obtained a mean dry matter of 1.9 t/ha, almost double compared to those who did not apply manure, which yielded 1.0 t/ha dry matter. Bungoma plots, to which manure was applied, yielded 1.6 t/ha dry matter, while un-manured plots averaged 1.0 t/ha dry matter. A similar trend was noted in Busia and Siaya counties. These findings reflect those of Zhou et al. (2018) who reported a 10-80% increase in yield when using geneticallyadvantaged crops coupled with appropriate agronomic management practices. Higher yields can help to encourage adoption of new forage varieties among farmers. This therefore confirms that farmers should be keen to manure their forage plots after every cutting season. During the entire study period, a very large percentage of the farmers had not fertilized their plots. In Kakamega, 90% of plots went unfertilized while 9.3% were fertilized, which is a similar to Bungoma. Siaya had the largest percentage of unfertilized plots at 96.7%. This was especially during the initial stages of the study. In Busia 91% of the plots went unfertilized while 9% were fertilized. The interactions between fertilizer use on forage plots and forage yields played out as for manure application. Plots to which fertilizer was applied at least once after the cutting cycle provided higher yields (Figure 18). In Kakamega, fertilized plots yielded 2.6 t/ha dry weight compared to 1.1 t/ha from unfertilized plots. Fertilized plots in Busia yielded 2.3 t/ha, compared to the significantly lower yields (1.8 t/ha) on plots where fertilizer was not used. In Siaya, plots that were not fertilized yielded 1.8 t/ha compared to 1.5 t/ha on fertilized plots. In Bungoma, unfertilized plots yielded 1.1 t/ha, while fertilized crops yielded 1.6 t/ ha. These findings align with Wambugu et al. (2012) whose study focused on interactions between fertilizer application and varietal selection in western Kenya and who reported an 88% increase in crop yields. There was, however, a decline in dry weight yields of fertilized plots at harvest 4. Insufficient moisture in the soil during the drier months of January and February may have constrained mineralization, limiting the effectiveness or uptake of the fertilizer applied. Soil analysis is generally undertaken to establish the status of the soil, further confirming it as a potential source of variability in on-farm forage production. The soils in western Kenya are mostly Ferrasols and Acrisols, which are highly weathered and lacking in nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P). Continuous cultivation of crops, without replenishing soil nutrients, has also contributed to the depletion of key soil nutrients such as N and P (Keino et al., 2015), as shown by the poor levels of N and P in the soils across all sites (Table 3). The impoverished condition of the soil may explain why fodder production levels in the study sites did not reach their full potential (Figure 19). Phosphorous plays an important role in pasture production, which generally increases with Olsen P availability (Edmeades at al., 2010). Table 3 illustrates soil conditions across the four counties, confirming the significant difference (<0.0001) in soil quality across the sites and heterogeneity with each county, causing variability in forage production. This difference in performance between counties is an indication of the varying response of varieties to available soil nutrients. On-farm resources used in farm management and access to inputs can differ considerably, even within the same community (Zingore et al., 2007). This is why research methods should factor in onfarm variability, including soil fertility. On-farm research enables us to understand the production potential of improved tropical forages under unguided farmer management practices in western Kenya. In this report, we present preliminary results from monitoring agronomic performance of project beneficiaries who received seeds of improved forage grasses. From our survey results, 70% of the farmer beneficiaries who received planting materials integrated these forages into their farming systems. Farmers are positive about the new varieties due to their potential to provide both high quality and quantities of livestock feed compared to their traditional livestock feeds. Preliminary analysis of the on-farm agronomic monitoring indicates differences in performance between counties, forage varieties and harvests. Differences in soil fertility and management practices (weeding and fertilization) affect the outcomes (number of harvests and yield). High variability in production and yields are observed, which can be attributed to heterogeneous agroecological environments and smallholder farmer management practices, explaining why forage technologies perform differently on-farm compared with research stations. Further analysis is needed to disentangle the interaction between genetic material, agroecological conditions, management factors and forage productivity. On-farm studies such as this provide insights into the production of forages under heterogeneous farmer environments, helping to guide scientists and policy makers in better targeting and scaling improved forage technologies, interventions and practices.Nelly Adhiambo has increased her farm's milk production in Busia, Kenya as a result of the forage grasses introduced by the Grass2Cash project, ","tokenCount":"4200"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1768261282.json b/data/part_2/1768261282.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cfd8d3d2979845568c52a51c0ce051615f9faf3a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1768261282.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"68a56bdec90aeb3b55b4bcd82875cd60","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/1ae9ae52-8ff3-4bc8-b898-32944b1e59f4/content","id":"300759207"},"keywords":["wheat","Triticum aestivum L.","Septoria tritici blotch","QTL analysis"],"sieverID":"1cad72dd-c52d-44c6-b2e3-fd5311ddf859","pagecount":"12","content":"Septoria tritici blotch (STB) caused by Mycosphaerella graminicola, is one of the most destructive foliar diseases of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) especially in temperate and humid regions across the world. The susceptibility of recently released varieties, evolution of resistance to fungicides and increasing incidence of STB disease emphasizes the need to understand the genetics of resistance to this disease and to incorporate host resistance into adapted cultivars. This study aimed to decipher the genetics and map the resistance to STB using a recombinant inbred line (RIL) mapping population derived from 'Steele-ND' (susceptible parent) and 'ND 735' (resistant parent). The RILs were evaluated in three greenhouse experiments, using a North Dakota (ND) isolate of STB pathogen. The mean disease severity of parental genotypes, 'ND 735' (11.96%) and 'Steele-ND' (66.67%) showed significant differences (p < 0.05). The population segregated for STB and the frequency distribution of RILs indicated quantitative inheritance for resistance. The mean disease severity in RILs ranged from 0 to 71.55% with a mean of 21.98%. The genome map of this population was developed using diversity array technology (DArT) and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. The framework linkage map of this population was developed using 469 molecular markers. This map spanned a total distance of 1,789.3 cM and consisted of 17 linkage groups. QTL mapping using phenotypic data and the framework linkage maps detected three QTL through composite interval mapping. One QTL was consistently detected in all experiments on the long arm of chromosome 5B, and explained up to 10.2% phenotypic variation. The other two QTLs, detected in single environments, were mapped to 1D and 7A and explain 13% and 5.5% of the phenotypic variation, respectively. The map position of the consistent QTL on 5BL coincides with the map position of durable resistance gene Stb1 suggesting the importance of this region of 'ND 735' as a source of durable STB resistance for the wheat germplasm.Septoria tritici blotch (STB), a major leaf spotting disease of durum (Triticum turgidum L.) and bread wheat (T. aestivum L.), is incited by Mycosphaerella graminicola (Fückel) Schröter in Cohn (anamorph: Septoria tritici Desm.). It is one of the most destructive foliar diseases of wheat in temperate and humid regions (Eyal et al. 1987). In North America, STB occurs in association with other leaf spotting diseases including Stagonospora nodorum blotch (SNB), caused by Phaeosphaeria nodorum and tan spot caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Gilbert and Woods 2001;Singh et al. 2006). STB reduces the photosynthetic area of the leaves, causing a reduction in the amount of carbohydrates assimilation during grain filling that results in lower number and weight of kernels. Losses can be very high and may reach 50% under conditions favourable for disease development (King et al. 1983;Eyal et al. 1987). Further, STB causes significant losses in grain quality by black point, red smudge, and shriveled grain that causes reduced flour yield.In recent decades, STB has increased in importance worldwide because of the intensified wheat production, growing of cultivars susceptible to STB, and changes in cultural practices including adoption of conservation agriculture practices that have been gaining popularity for reasons ranging from the economics of production to protection of the environment (Eyal et al. 1987;Ghaffary et al. 2011). It is anticipated that due to climate change, further increase in incidence and severity of STB will occur. The most widely grown hard red spring wheat (HRSW) cultivars are susceptible to STB (Singh et al. 2006;Mergoum et al. 2007). Fungicides offer control, but when grain prices are low, their use is not cost-effective and detrimental to the environment. Additionally, the recent discovery of resistance to fungicide has reduced the efficiency of these fungicides over time (Gisi et al. 2000(Gisi et al. , 2005) ) and further increased interest in breeding and growing STB resistant cultivars. Therefore, the incorporation of host resistance and development and cultivation of durable resistant cultivars is the most effective, economical, and environmentally friendly strategy for mitigating the threat of STB.Understanding the mode of inheritance and mapping genes for STB resistance is paramount for breeders to develop breeding strategies for incorporation of STB resistance into adapted germplasm. The deployment of host resistance will prolong the latent period of STB infection as well as reduce the number and size of chlorotic and necrotic lesion formed in the leaf (Eyal et al. 1987;Kema et al. 1996;Somasco et al. 1996). The qualitative mode of inheritance was reported in studies of Arraianio et al. (2007), Brading et al. (2002), McCartney et al. (2002) and Somasco et al. (1996), wherein a gene-for-gene interaction has been suggested in the wheat-M. graminicola pathosystem based on significant cultivar-isolate interactions. To date, eighteen major genes conferring STB resistance (Brading et al. 2002;McCartney et al. 2002;Adhikari et al. 2003Adhikari et al. , 2004a, b, c;, b, c;Chartrain et al. 2004Chartrain et al. , 2005;;Arraianio et al. 2007;Ghaffary et al. 2011) have been reported and majority of them have been mapped using molecular markers. However, quantitative inheritance was reported in other studies (Jlibene et al. 1994;Simon and Cordo 1997;Zhang et al. 2001;Chartrain et al. 2004;Arraianio and Brown 2006). Quantitative resistance is generally isolate non-specific and provides resistance to wide variety of isolates. Partial resistance and tolerance mechanism to STB has also been observed. Additionally, QTL mapping studies by Eriksen et al. (2003) reported QTL associated with both seedling and adult plant resistance for STB in a double-haploid population from 'Savannah' and 'Senat'. They mapped six QTL including QTL associated with seedling resistance on chromosome 3A near the Stb6 locus and QTL for adult plant resistance on chromosomes 3A, 6B and 7B. Simon et al. (2004) using two different Argentinean isolates, mapped three QTL for seedling resistance to STB on chromosomes 1D, 2D and 6B and two QTL for adult plant resistance on 3D and 7B. This study also concluded that the position of the major QTL located on chromosome 7B is near or coincides with previously mapped gene Stb8 by Adhikari et al. (2003).Breeding for host resistance for STB disease is difficult due to the low heritability of non-specific resistance, lack of knowledge on the pathogen virulence spectrum, and scarcity of durable resistant source (Eyal 1999). Under field conditions, evaluation of wheat for resistance to STB is challenged by the variation in the environment, amount of natural inoculum, and competition between pathogen causing foliar diseases for healthy tissue to infect and colonize the plant (Gilchrist et al. 1999). Additionally, STB disease is seen as mixed infection with other leaf spotting diseases, making phenotypic evaluation difficult and erroneous. Studies have reported that evaluation of seedling for resistance to Septoria diseases under controlled conditions is accurate and reproducible, due to uniform disease pressure (Eyal 1999). Many studies have also reported a positive correlation between assessments of resistance at seedling level and adult plants under natural infection in the field conditions (Somasco et al. 1996).Several studies have shown that a particular trait could have different genetic control among different segregating populations, making it important to study the genetic control of a trait of interest in different backgrounds and to have a more complete knowledge of the genetic architecture of the trait of interest. This objective of the present study was to determine the genetic control of resistance to STB under greenhouse condition and to map genes/QTL in a RIL population derived from HRSW wheat cultivar 'Steele-ND' (Mergoum et al. 2005) and HRSW line 'ND 735' (Mergoum et al. 2006). The identified molecular markers associated with QTL for resistance to STB may prove useful in HRSW breeding programs aimed at developing cultivars resistant to STB through marker assisted selection (MAS).One hundred and twenty nine RILs were developed from a cross between HRSW wheat cultivar 'Steele-ND' (Mergoum et al. 2005) and HRSW line 'ND 735' (Mergoum et al. 2006). North Dakota State University (NDSU), Fargo, ND, released this F 2-8 RIL population in 2008 (Mergoum et al. 2009). The wheat cultivar 'Steele-ND' released in 2004 has the pedigree of 'Parshall' (PI 613587)/ND706, while line 'ND 735' is derived from the cross of ND 2709/3/'Grandin' (PI 531005)*3//'Ramsey' (CItr 13246)/ND 622/ND 2809.The cultivar 'Steele-ND' and line 'ND 735' show susceptible and resistant reaction, respectively, to major leaf spotting diseases including STB, SNB, all virulent races of tan spot found in ND, and to toxins Ptr Tox A (produced by races 1 and 2 of Pyrenophora tritici-repentis) and Ptr Tox B (produced by race 5) (Singh et al. 2006;Mergoum et al. 2007).To evaluate the 129 RILs and their parents, three independent experiments were conducted in 2009 under similar greenhouse conditions at NDSU, Fargo, ND. Each line was planted in plastic cones (3.8 cm in diameter and 20 cm long) filled with Sunshine mix blend #1(Fison Horticulture, Vancouver, B.C.). Fertilization was done using slow releasing fertilizer (3 g/l 15-30-15 Miracle Gro, Scotts, Pot Washington, NY). Watering of plants was done as required. Greenhouse temperatures were maintained in the range of 21-25ºC with 16 h photoperiod. Each experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with two replicates and four plants per cone formed an experimental unit. Additionally, 'Salamouni' as a resistant check and 'Glenlea' as a susceptible check were included in each experiment.Inoculums were produced using yeast sucrose liquid medium. The medium was prepared by mixing 10 g of yeast extract and 10 g of sucrose in 1 L of distilled water. From this solution, 100 ml medium was transferred to 250 ml capacity Erlenmeyer flasks and autoclaved for 20 min. After cooling, 200 µl of kanamycin sulphate was added to each flask. Approximately 1 ml of liquid culture of STB isolate Ma04-94 was transferred to each flask. Flasks were covered with cotton plugs and kept in an orbit shaker (Barnstead/Thermolyne, Dubuque, IA) at 150 rpm for 3-5 days depending up on growth of culture. After shaking, mycelia were removed by filtering the inoculum through 2-3 layers of cheesecloth. The spore suspension was counted using a haemocytometer and adjusted to 1.0 × 10 7 spores/ml before inoculation. Two drops of Tween 20 (polyxyethlene sorbitan monolaurate) was added per 100 ml of spore suspension before inoculation.Plants were inoculated with spores of M. graminicola nineteen days after planting using a CO 2 -pressurized hand sprayer until runoff. Inoculated plants were allowed to dry off before transferring them to the mist chamber under continuous leaf wetness for 60 h. The mist chamber conditions were maintained at temperature 20-23ºC, humidity 85-100%, and a photoperiod of 16 h. The mist chamber was kept open for 1 h every 24 h to allow proper ventilation and avoid yellowing of leaf. Subsequently, the plants were transferred to greenhouse benches at a temperature of 21-25ºC until disease symptoms were observed.Plants were assessed for STB symptoms three weeks after inoculation. One infected leaf from each plant was scored for disease symptoms. Reactions were scored visually for the disease severity on a scale of 0 to 100 percentage by estimating the percentage leaf area covered with necrotic lesions with or without pycnidia (Gaunt et al. 1986;Saadaoui 1987).In the present study, 469 molecular marker data on 118 RILs was used for construction of linkage maps. These include 429 DArT (Akbari et al. 2006) and 10 SSR markers described previously (Singh et al. 2010). Additionally, 30 more polymorphic SSRs were used as anchoring markers to reconstruct the linkage map for this population. DNA isolation and SSR analysis was performed as described earlier (Singh et al. 2010).The analysis of variance was done using the general linear model (PROC GLM) considering genotypes and environment as random effects (Statistical Analysis System version 8.2, SAS Institute 1999). Error homogeneity was tested using a factor of 10 test. The broad sense heritability was calculated based on the ANOVA analysis. The linkage maps were constructed using MAPMAKER v3.0 (Lander et al. 1987) with a minimum LOD score of 3.0 and using Kosambi mapping function (Kosambi 1994). The QTL analysis was conducted on individual experimental data with composite interval mapping (CIM), using Windows QTL Cartographer v2.0 software (Wang et al. 2004). In this method, model 6 with forward and backward step-wise regression with five markers as cofactors to control genetic background effects and a 10 cM genome-wide scan window, was used for the detection of QTL. A LOD score of 2.0 was used for determining the presence of a putative QTL.The parental genotypes of the RIL population showed contrasting reaction to STB and the RIL population was segregating for this trait. The susceptible parent 'Steele-ND' showed (Fig. 1, Table 1) a mean disease severity of 66.67% (range of 60% to 80%), statistically different (p < 0.05) from the resistant parent 'ND 735' which has a mean disease severity of 11.96% (range of 6.25 to 15.63%). The resistant check cultivar 'Salamouni' had mean disease severity of 2.17% (range of 1.25 to 2.75%) while, the susceptible check cultivar 'Glenlea' had a mean disease severity of 89.58% with a range varying from 83.75 to 98.75%. The mean disease severity of first experiment was low (14.01%) compared to other experiments. The highest mean disease severity (28.93%) and high pycnidial density was observed in the second experiment. The combined ANOVA for the three greenhouse experiments including the129 RILs, parents, the resistant and susceptible checks indicated significant differences (p < 0.0001) among the means of genotypes (RILs) for STB resistance (Table 2). The significant effect of genotype by location interaction indicates the high variability for this disease. The majority of lines showed transgressive segregation in the direction of resistant parent 'ND 735' and the frequency distribution in each greenhouse season indicated the quantitative nature of disease resistance (Fig. 1). The broad sense heritability was calculated to be 0.88 based on the estimation of the components of variance. Such higher heritability estimates are common in greenhouse based disease resistance studies. Collectively these results indicated significant variations for the STB resistance in the parental genotypes and the RILs of the mapping population used during the present study, thus, suggesting its suitability for conducting QTL analysis.A total of 469 polymorphic marker (429 DArT and 40 SSR) data on 118 RILs was used for the construction of linkage maps. Linkage maps, containing at least 3 marker loci, were obtained for 14 chromosomes (Fig. S1*). The final linkage map contain 392 markers (364 DArT and 28 SSR) assigned to 277 unique loci. The total genetic length of the linkage map was 1,789.3 cM; with an average density of one marker per 4.57 cM (Fig. S1). The B genome had the highest number of mapped loci, while the D genome had the minimum loci. The map lengths were 840.3 cM, 788 cM and 161 cM for the A, B and D genomes, respectively. The B genome had 245 markers spread over 788 cM covering whole B genome with average marker density of one marker per 3.22 cM. The A genome had a total of 138 markers covering most of the A genome except chromosome 2A. The A genome had a map length of 840.3 cM with average marker density of one marker per 6.09 cM. The D genome had the least marker density (one marker/17.89 cM) and least map coverage (9 markers covering 161 cM map length only on chromosome 1D). The individual map lengths range from 42.60 cM on 5B to 201.60 cM on 7B and the number of markers in individual chromosomes range from 9 on 1D to 59 in 2B. The order of SSR markers and the DArT markers was mostly in agreement with the other published maps (Semagn et al., 2006;Francki et al., 2009).Results of QTL mapping conducted on individual experiment data as well as mean data is given in Table 3 and Figure 2. Composite interval mapping identified one stable QTL on chromosome 5BL that was mapped in all individual experimental data. This QTL on 5BL explained up to 10.20% of phenotypic variation. The other two QTLs were detected one each on 1D and 7A. These QTLs explained 13% and 5.5% of phenotypic variation, re- spectively. The QTLs on 1D and 7A were detected only in the third experimental data. The position of QTL detected on 5BL was similar in all experimental data. This stable QTL was mapped on long arm of 5B flanked by two DArT markers (XwPt-7101/X377410). As the stable QTL only explained a maximum of 10.20% of the phenotypic variation, the rest of the variation could possibly be explained by the other QTLs and the interaction that may be present in unmapped linkage groups.The genomic constraints of the large hexaploid wheat genome as well as the lower level of polymorphism exhibited by common wheat compared to other cereals (Langridge et al. 2001) makes the molecular mapping efforts in common wheat very complex. Therefore, genetically diverse parents or inter-specific crosses have been utilized to create the mapping populations. However, these populations lack desirable trait variation that can be readily used in breeding program for commercial cultivars. Molecular mapping on populations derived from inter-varietal crosses were suggested to make the marker-trait association more relevant to the objectives of the breeding program (Varshney et al. 1998;Somers et al. 2004). This study involved a population developed from an inter-varietal cross, similar to their inter-varietal populations utilized by Liu et al. (2005) and Paillard et al. (2003) for developing genetic maps. The length of the linkage map (1,789.7 cM) developed during the present study was less than other published wheat maps, which could be attributed to low level of polymorphism for the D genome. The largest linkage group in our study was in chromosome 7B (201.60 cM), which is slightly larger than other published maps of Liu et al. (2005) and Paillard et al. (2003). The line 'ND 735' showed a high level of resistance to STB. Additionally, Singh et al. (2010) studying the same RIL mapping population mapped resistance genes Tsr1 and Tsr6 for resistance to races 2 and 5 of Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, cause of tan spot of wheat. The gene Tsr1 was mapped in 5BL and Tsr6 was mapped in 2BS, with DArT markers wPt-3049 (2.9 cM) and wPt-0289 (4.6 cM), linked to both genes, respectively. The same mapping population was used by Singh et al. (2011) for mapping Tsn1 locus in 5BL, which confers resistance to spore suspension and culture filtrate for Phaeosphaeria nodorum isolate Sn2000, the causal agent of Stagonospora nodorum blotch (SNB). The line 'ND 735' is also resistant to Fusarium head blight (Mergoum et al. 2007). The presence of the tetraploid wheat cultivar Ramsey as well as FHB-resistant Chinese wheat cultivar 'Sumai 3' in its pedigree makes 'ND 735' resistant to Septoria diseases and FHB (unpublished data). The cultivar 'Steele-ND' shows susceptible reaction to the STB, SNB, tan spot and FHB (Mergoum et al. 2005;Singh et al. 2010Singh et al. , 2011)), but is superior in many agronomic and quality traits. This shows that this RIL population segregates for a lot of traits, meaning that it is useful for identifying QTLs associated with disease resistance, agronomy and quality traits.The accurate phenotyping of STB is difficult in field conditions of ND, due to the mixed infection of various leaf spotting diseases as well as less favorable environmental conditions for disease development during the spring wheat-growing season. Therefore, most of the STB studies in ND (Mergoum et al. 2007;Ali et al. 2008), were conducted in greenhouse conditions at seedling stage. Previous QTL mapping experiments on STB (Eriksen et al. 2003;Simon et al. 2004;Simon et al. 2010) involved testing at seedling and adult plant stages. Simon et al. (2010) mapped two-linked isolate specific QTLs for seedling and adult plant resistance to STB using an Argentinean isolate. This further confirmed the positive correlation found in the studies of Somasco et al. (1996) and the efficacy of doing seedling stage evaluation for resistance to STB. However, seedling resistance is not always strongly associated with adult plant resistance for STB hence additional efforts are needed to identify and incorporate adult plant resistance into commercial cultivars.The majority of molecular mapping studies in STB confirmed the existence of major gene resistance following the gene-for gene-model. The QTL mapping studies of Eriksen et al. (2003), Simon et al. (2004), andSimon et al. (2010) found the position of major QTL coinciding with the position of already mapped major genes. During our study, the position of stable QTL was mapped to the long arm of chromosome 5B. Previously, Adhikari et al. (2003), mapped resistance gene Stb1 on the long arm of chromosome 5B using RAPD and microsatellite markers. The gene Stb1, originated from the wheat cultivar 'Bulgaria 88' was bred into the soft red winter cultivars 'Oasis' and 'Sullivan' in Indiana and is among the few genes that have provided durable resistance to STB in the central USA since its deployment in the early 1970s (Adhikari et al. 2003). Therefore, it seems the QTL found in this study is the same as Stb1, a durable resistance gene, which is more likely the major source of resistance to STB in the 'Steele-ND'/'ND 735' RIL mapping population. The identification of a QTL on 5BL at the same location where a major gene/QTL for STB had been earlier reported suggests the importance of this region in a variety of wheat germplasm and environments, but probably with various levels of expression in different genetic backgrounds. Previous mapping of several other disease resistance genes, like Tsr1 for resistance to race 2 Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, causing tan spot (Singh et al. 2010) and Tsn1 conferring resistance to spore suspension and culture filtrate for Phaeosphaeria nodorum isolate Sn2000, cause of Stagonospora nodorum blotch (Mergoum et al. 2009) in the same region suggests the importance of the this region of chromosome 5B.This study, utilizing 469 molecular markers observed 17 linkage groups across 14 chromosomes. The study identified one consistent QTL on long arm of chromosome 5B across environments and two QTL on 1D and 7A in only specific environments. This indicates that genotype × environmental interaction influence on QTL detection. Previous studies have identified genes contributing to STB resistance located on chromosomes 1D (Chartrain et al. 2005) and 7A (Goodwin 2007), however, further studies are needed to confirm the relationship. Additionally, since in this study involved markers located on 14 chromosomes hence there may be more loci present in the rest of the genome that may be contributing to STB resistance.The current study as well as previous studies by our research team (Singh et al. 2010(Singh et al. , 2011) ) confirms the presence of multiple leaf spot resistance in 'ND 735' and the effectiveness of the combination of DArT and SSR markers for molecular mapping of disease resistance genes. The line 'ND 735', in all likelihood possess durable resistance, a resistance effective over time and space, for tan spot, Stagonospora nodorum blotch and Septoria tritici blotch that can be easily utilized as a source for incorporating multiple leaf spot resistance into varietal development. Additionally, since 'ND 735' possesses good quality and agronomic characteristics, utilizing 'ND 735' in breeding programs will not bring undesired traits, due to linkage drag when using it as a donor parent.","tokenCount":"3819"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1784363692.json b/data/part_2/1784363692.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c471cbffbbdd04b8e44d628f0488225096045622 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1784363692.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a65e4916f22d9c93aba5fb528059660f","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/66c6ba3f-706b-476a-9459-1e31607697e3/retrieve","id":"830969881"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"eb0e9bed-71ec-4529-acca-bc00a1e2eb22","pagecount":"6","content":"The potato was domesticated 7,000 -10,000 ago in the Andean highlands of South America, where it became a staple food. In recent times, potato production has grown slowly in the countries of this region and in some cases it has declined. A recent review of potato production statistics (Scott, 2011) indicates that annual growth rates for the potato crop in Latin America as a whole have lagged behind those for other developing regions, including Africa and Asia. In Peru, however, potato production has expanded dramatically in recent years. As Scott (2011: 148) notes, \"the renaissance in potato output and area planted in Peru over the last 15 years has been perhaps the most remarkable development in the region over the last half century. \"In this Innovation Brief, we examine recent trends in potato production in Peru and explore the role of native potatoes in the renaissance of Peruvian potato For the past half century, potato production has grown slowly in the Andean region of South America, where the potato originated and has long been a major staple food. The exception is Peru, where potato production has surged in recent years. Based on a review of official Peruvian statistics, this Innovation Brief documents trends in Peruvian potato production over the past half century, estimates production and marketing of native and improved potato varieties over the past decade, and identifies factors that have influenced these trends. The recent growth in Peru's potato production reflects changes in both supply and demand. On the supply side, the rapid expansion of Peru's road network, the increasing number and size of trucks, and the spread of cellphones have dramatically improved the links between highland farmers and dynamic urban markets and have reduced marketing costs. On the demand side, the image of the potato has changed from one of a \"poor man's food\" to one of an under-exploited national treasure and source of pride. The Project for Potato Innovation and Competitiveness in Peru (INCOPA Project) has promoted the cultivation and use of native potatoes through public-private alliances that pursue: innovations in production and marketing, policy changes, and public awareness. This initiative appears to have stimulated demand for native and improved potatoes and it has also contributed to the supply of new production technology. Many small farmers, including those who cultivate native potatoes, have benefitted from the recent increases in potato production, sales, and farm-gate prices. The main benefits of market chain innovation and increased market demand for potatoes have accrued to early innovators characterized by higher levels of education, larger land holdings, better access to credit and input supplies and to markets for their products, and superior endowments of financial and social capital and entrepreneurial capabilities.production. Specific objectives are to: document trends in Peruvian potato production over the past half century; estimate trends in production and marketing of native and improved potato varieties for the past decade; and identify key factors that have influenced these trends, and the policy implications.We use the terms \"native potatoes\" and \"native varieties\" to denote landraces or local potato varieties that have developed largely by natural processes, by adaptation to the natural and cultural environment in which they grow. Native varieties differ from \"improved varieties\", which are the products of formal potato breeding programs, which have been deliberately bred to conform to a particular official standard of traits, such as high yield and resistance to pests or diseases. Hundreds of native potato varieties are still cultivated in the highlands of Peru and other parts of the Andes. In poor and remote mountainous areas, \"the potato remains a key component in the livelihood systems of small-scale farmers, contributing to food security as a direct food source and as a cash crop\" (Meinzen Dick et al., 2009:235). In Andean highland areas above 3,500 m.a.s.l. the potato crop generates more added value and employment per hectare than any other food crop.Potatoes are grown throughout the Peruvian highlands and also in irrigated valleys on the central coast. Native potato varieties are typically grown by farm families on small plots of land above 3,500 m.a.s.l. The vast majority of Peru's potato producers are smallholder farmers, who cultivate less than a half hectare of potatoes. In contrast, improved potato varieties are typically grown on larger plots of land in better-endowed areas at lower elevations. Large-scale commercial farms are few in number and generally cultivate potatoes in fertile inter-Andean valleys and in irrigated valleys along Peru's coast.This Innovation Brief is based primarily on an analysis of statistics from Peru's Ministry of Agriculture. Beginning in 1950, Peru's Ministry of Agriculture has estimated national and departmentlevel 1 potato production, the harvested area, the number of farmers who produce potatoes, the volume of potatoes sold by farmers, and the prices received by farmers. More recently, the Ministry has estimated the same variables for each of Peru's districts 2 .We begin with an analysis of trends in national potato production, area, and yields over the last half-century . Beginning in 2000, we broaden the analysis to include potato marketing at farm level. We use district-level data to estimate production, sales, and prices of native and improved varieties in the following way: we use the altitude of each district capital to establish two sets of districts, (a) those with capitals at 3,500 m.a.s.l. or higher, and (b) those below this altitude. We assume that farmers residing in the first set of districts produce only native varieties and those residing in the second set produce only improved varieties. Based on these assumptions, we use the Ministry of Agriculture statistics for the two sets of potato-producing districts to estimate the following variables:• Production, harvested area, and yields for improved and native potato varieties (2000-2011)• Number of producers of improved and native potato varieties (2000-2011)• Volume of farm-gate sales of native and improved potato varieties (2000-2011)• Farm-gate prices for improved and native potato varieties, in New Peruvian Soles of 2011 (1991-2011) 3 We use results of the annual National Survey of Households to estimate the number of farmers who sell potatoes and the portion of their harvest that they sell.Summary statistics are presented in Table 1 and Figures 1-4. Time series of 3-year moving averages for all the variables analyzed appear in the Annex to the web version of this Brief, which is available from www.cipotato.org/resources/publications. In all the tables and figures, we present average results for the variables in question. Since the distributions of land holdings and market surpluses are highly skewed -more like \"power-law\" distributions than normal distributions -the averages may not represent the \"normal\" situation of most potato producers. The situation of the majority of producers -ones with very small land holdings -may be quite different from that of the few large producers, and arithmetic averages for all producers may differ from typical values for these two extreme types of farmer. For this reason, an important area for future research would be to analyze production and marketing data disaggregated by size of land holding.1 Peru has 24 departments, 19 of which produce potatoes. 2 Peru has 1,834 districts, of which 1,373 produce potatoes.3 Prices have been deflated based on Peru's consumer price index (Index 2011=100).Yearly prices are volume-weighted averages calculated with monthly data.Table 1 summarizes the main changes in potato production, marketing, and prices since 2000. Figures 1-3 show trends in potato production, harvested area, and yields since 1960. Figure 4 shows price trends since 1990.Total potato production. Over the past half century, potato production has expanded from about 1.2 million tons in the early 1960's to 3.7 million tons in 2009-2011. As Figure 1 shows, the growth in production has been anything but steady. Production increased during the 1960's and then stagnated during the 1970's.In the 1980s, production first declined and then increased. In the early 1990's, production plummeted back to the level it was at in the early 1960s. From around 1993 until 2000, potato production shot up dramatically. From 2000 to 2005, it expanded less rapidly, and since then, it has surged ahead rapidly again.The time series for harvested area has the same peaks and valleys as that for total potato production. But while the harvested area today is about the same as it was 40 years ago, production has doubled. Potato yields, which were just over 5 t/ha in the early 1960s, increased to about 7 t/ha in 1970 and to 8 t/ha in 1980. During the 1980s, yields increased and then fell back again. In the 1990's yields recovered and then shot up to nearly 12 t/ha in 2000. Since then, yields have increased gradually to their present level of around 13.5 t/ha.Production of native and improved potato varieties. Since 2000, production of native varieties has grown more rapidly than production of improved varieties (by 33% and 23%, respectively). The faster growth of native potato production reflects more rapid expansion in the area planted to them, which has more than compensated for the faster growth of yields for improved varieties.As Table 1 shows, fewer than 1 million Peruvian farmers produced potatoes in 2000. Of these, 650,000 produced improved varieties and 344,000 produced native varieties. Since 2000, the number of producers has increased by about one-quarter, with the proportions producing improved and native varieties remaining constant.The average farm area with potatoes is small and declining. In 2000/2002, farmers cultivated an average of 0.28 ha of improved varieties and 0.24 ha of native varieties. By 2008-2010, the average cultivated area of both types of potato had declined to about 0.23 ha. Given the skewed distribution of land holdings, most farmers cultivate much smaller plots of potatoes while a few cultivate much larger tracts.Since 2000, the number and the proportion of potato farmers who market potatoes have both fallen. At the beginning of the decade, two-thirds of the farmers who cultivated improved varieties sold part of their harvest; by 2008/2010, this proportion had fallen to one-third. Over the same period, the proportion of farmers who marketed a portion of their harvest of native potatoes declined from 40% to under 20%. As will be seen below, the decline in the number of farmers who market potatoes was accompanied by an increase in the number of farmers who produce potatoes and an increase in the volume sold. In other words, over time, a declining number of the potato farmers is producing and marketing an increasing share of the potatoes.The average farm-gate price of potatoes (in New Peruvian Soles of 2011) declined during the 1990's, with an uptick in the middle of the decade. Prices remained essentially flat from 2000 to 2005, and since then, they have climbed upward (Figure 2). The increases in potato prices have been particularly striking for native varieties.Since 2005/2007, average prices for native potatoes increased by 49%, while prices for improved varieties increased by 26%.Peruvian farmers cultivate potatoes to provide food for their families and also to generate cash income 4 . Household survey data shows that most of the harvest of improved varieties is sold; in contrast, most native potatoes are retained for household consumption and seed. In 2000/2002, farmers growing improved varieties sold 57% of their harvest, compared to only 20% for farmers growing native varieties. By 2008/2010, farmers growing improved varieties sold 60% of their harvest and farmers growing native varieties sold 28%. From these figures it can be seen that while the share of improved varieties that is sold increased by only 5%, the share of native varieties that is sold increased by 40% over an 8-year period.During the same period, the volume of improved varieties that was marketed increased by about one-quarter while the volume of native varieties that was marketed increased by three-quarters.Since farm-gate prices have increased in recent years, especially for native potatoes, the value of potatoes sold has increased significantly more than the volume sold. Since 2000, the value of sales of improved and native potato varieties has increased by 67% and 159%, respectively.As noted earlier, while the number of farmers who produce both improved and native varieties has increased, the numbers who sell potatoes has fallen. Consequently, the average value of sales for each farmer who sells potatoes has increased very sharply. Since 2000, the farmers who sold improved and native potatoes increased the value of their sales by 174% and 433%, respectively. In 2008/2010, farmers who sold improved and native potato varieties generated an average of 3,800 and 3,000 New Peruvian Soles (US$ 1,292 and $ 1,020 5 ) from their sales, respectively. During the last half century, Peru's agricultural sector was negatively impacted by disputes over land tenure (1960s), a traumatic land reform process (1970s), and terrorism (1980s). The collapse of potato production in the early 1990s reflected the grave state of rural insecurity that prevailed in the Peruvian highlands at that time. The defeat of the terrorist Shining Path movement in 1993 marked the beginning of two decades of sustained growth in Peruvian agriculture, which is reflected in recent trends in potato production.Other significant drivers of the recent expansion of potato production have been the pro-business policies of recent Peruvian governments, strong overall growth of the Peruvian economy, and political and budgetary decentralization. Peru's gross domestic product grew at an annual average rate of 6.3% from 2001 to 2010 (IADB, 2010: 7), and per-capita rural incomes have grown at an average annual rate of 5.1% since 1995, driven mainly by agricultural growth (Webb, 2013). The acceleration of road building and the wide diffusion of cellular phones have also contributed to economic growth and income improvements in the Peruvian highlands. Whereas Peru constructed on average only 1,000 km of new roads each year from 1950 to 2000, it has added 3,000 km of new roads each year since 2000. Rapid expansion of the road network coupled with an even larger increase in the number and size of trucks plying these roads has dramatically reduced the costs of marketing agricultural commodities produced in the highlands, such as potatoes (Webb, 2013). All of these factors have stimulated the growth of small towns and the small-farm sector in highland areas.Strong growth of the Peruvian economy has driven increases in per capita incomes and expansion of demand for foods, such as potatoes, which are consumed in diverse forms in homes and in restaurants. The rapid growth of food processing and consumption of convenience and snack foods has stimulated the demand for potatoes, which are a basic ingredient in the fast-food and snackfood industries. In a parallel process, growing concerns for nutrition and food safety have stimulated interest in native potato varieties, which are usually grown with less use of chemical pesticides and fertilizers than in the case of improved varieties.Recent recognition of Peruvian cuisine as one of the world's most sophisticated and high-quality, has also stimulated the demand for foods of Andean origin, such as native potatoes, the virtues of which have been featured in high-profile events such as the \"Mistura\", a very important and massive food festival (http://www.mistura.pe).Native potatoes are now viewed as a uniquely \"Peruvian\" food that is healthy, nutritious, good tasting, and diverse in its forms and uses.The recent surge in potato production coincided with the first comprehensive initiative to promote the production and use of Peru's native varieties, by exploiting the emerging market opportunities for these potatoes. • Support for policy changes including, for example, norms for wholesale markets and inclusion of native potato varieties in the National Registry of Commercial Cultivars. This initiative helped improve the image of native potatoes and link small producers to dynamic urban markets for potato-based products (Devaux et al., 2009).Official statistics and assessments of the potato sector support the hypothesis that in recent years there has been an increase in the demand curve for potatoes -in particular for native potatoes (Proexpansión, 2012). In the past, increases in potato production and sales -even moderate ones -were associated with reductions in potato prices. However, since 2005 both potato sales and prices have risen. One possibility is that, due to reductions in transport costs, farm-gate prices for potatoes increased but wholesale and retail prices declined. But information from Lima's wholesale market over the past decade indicates that both potato sales and prices have risen here too, implying that consumer demand for potatoes has increased.The expansion of national potato production has resulted mainly from growth in the cultivation of improved potato varieties, which feature in the fast foods consumed by a growing number of Peruvians. The small farmers who cultivate native potatoes have also benefitted from the rapid expansion of this crop. Lagging yields of native potatoes have reflected the historic focus of agricultural Research & Development (R&D) on genetic improvement and commercial farming in better-endowed regions and inattention to the needs of small and poor farmers who cultivate native varieties in remote highland areas. Triggered by the growing interest of supermarkets and large-scale processors in native potatoes and the development of new products (for example, colorful potato chips and gourmet restaurant dishes made with native potatoes), agricultural researchers and nongovernmental organizations are now paying more attention to native varieties. This foretells well for future productivity increases and continued expansion of native potato cultivation and marketing.The main benefits of market chain innovation and increased market demand for potatoes have accrued to early innovators who have higher levels of education, larger land holdings, better access to credit, input supplies and markets for their products, and superior endowments of financial and social capital and entrepreneurial capabilities. Families with the smallest landholdings, the least education, the least access to credit, and the least-developed social networks have benefitted less from the new market opportunities (Escobal and Cavero, 2012). As Peru's economy has grown in recent years, many of the rural poor have left the farm, seeking better opportunities in mines, construction sites, and commercial activities. Their family members who remain on the farm usually continue to grow potatoes for home consumption, but often reduce potato sales.","tokenCount":"2975"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1794086877.json b/data/part_2/1794086877.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bcf728f1a9025791fe43707a625f9c4a5735a5a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1794086877.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"40f72cd0fb4527a13f1885873640a345","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/65e40125-f7ba-43db-b22f-e900839c2021/retrieve","id":"-986219794"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"843a663d-3167-443c-8a86-bb7963bbe5fd","pagecount":"16","content":"assessment of alternative innovations in RWS and CWS. The treatments in experiments were composed of a combination of CA-based practices, water-saving irrigation and N rates. Fourteen sustainability indicators computed from experiments and simulation were compared to evaluate the sustainability of those cropping systems and to reveal the potential of those practices for improving sustainability. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the initial conditions, the soil salinity decreased in both cropping systems, while the reduction rate was much higher in RWS than CWS (by 28%). In RWS, the conventional treatment had the lowest salinity level, while in CWS, CA (permeant bed + residue retention) had the lowest. RWS raised the groundwater table by 25% compared to CWS. The long-term scenario analysis with Hydrus-1D demonstrated that, with increased irrigation water salinity and soil evaporation rates, soil profile salinity increases by 78% in RWS and 66% in CWS. RWS had a higher net profit (+81%) and soil organic carbon (SOC) (-15%), but lower water productivity (WP) (− 147%), nitrogen, and energy use efficiency (EUE) (− 46%) than CWS. The CA-based practices in CWS improved sustainability indicators with higher yield and net profit (+20%), WP (+26%), SOC (+456%), and EUE (36%) with decreased soil salinity than in the conventional system. SIGNIFICANCE: The study attempts to assess the effectiveness of resource conservation technologies such as choice of crop species and cropping systems, and tillage and water and fertilizer management practices for improving sustainability. This study showed the significance of agronomic, soil, and water management practices for minimizing soil salinity. Further, the findings from this study strongly demonstrated the role of CA in sustainable agricultural production particularly under CWS in salt-affected irrigated dryland.• Declining water quantity and quality are leading to increasing soil salinity and threatening sustainability of saltaffected irrigated drylands • Experiments, simulation, and multicriteria trade-off used for assessing sustainability of predominant crops and technologies • Accounting multiple approaches, cotton-wheat system has better environmental indicators than rice-wheat system • Increased irrigation water salinity and soil evaporation can increase salinity by 78% in rice-wheat and by 66% in cotton-wheat • Conservation agriculture combined with efficient irrigation and optimal nitrogen rate has potential to improve sustainability of cotton-wheat system CONTEXT: Declining water quantity and quality and poor land, water, and crop management practices are leading to increasing soil salinity, land degradation, desertification, and threatening the overall sustainability of the crop production system in irrigated drylands. Assessments of salinity dynamics and sustainability indicators under alternative agricultural practices are needed to identify the right combination of practices that improve sustainability while minimizing land and environmental degradation.The objective of this study was to assess the potential of conservation agriculture (CA)-based practices, water-saving irrigation, water quality, and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates for improving the sustainability of rice-wheat (RWS) and cotton-wheat (CWS) systems in salt-affected irrigated drylands.The study included mixed-method approaches of two years of field experiments, soil profile and groundwater salinity simulation using Hydrus-1D model, and multi-criteria trade-off analysis for the holisticSoil salinization is a global problem that has affected 833 million ha of agricultural land in over 100 countries (Zaman et al., 2018). Globally, 833 million ha of soils are salt-affected (FAO, 2021). Approximately 20% of the world's cultivated lands and 33% of irrigated lands are saltaffected (Machado and Serralheiro, 2017). Soil salinization is spreading at the rate of 1-2 million ha year − 1 globally, affecting a significant portion of crop production and making land unsuitable for cultivation (Hopmans et al., 2021;Abbas et al., 2013).Irrigated agriculture plays a vital role in global food security, contributing to more than 40% of global food production (World Bank, 2021). To meet increasing food demand, the irrigated area needs to be expanded from current 202 million ha to 242 million ha in 2030 (Bruinsma, 2009; FAO News, 2021;Faurès et al., 2002). Moreover, the demand for irrigation is greater in arid-and semi-arid regions, where more than 90% of agriculture depends on irrigation. Also, these regions are more vulnerable to soil salinity and land degradation (Brady et al., 2008). In irrigated drylands, several factors, either in combination or independently, cause human-induced secondary soil salinization (Cuevas et al., 2019;Daliakopoulos et al., 2016;Qureshi et al., 2008). Prevalent improper land, water, and crop management practices include excessive use of poor quality (saline) irrigation water and poor drainage system (Wichelns and Qadir, 2015); inefficient use of chemical inputs (Gabriel et al., 2014); imbalance between rainfall, temperature, evapotranspiration, and water inputs (Minhas et al., 2020;Soni et al., 2021); intensive soil tillage, residue removal, and mono-cropping system (Abrol et al., 1988;Sarkar et al., 2020;Yang et al., 2006); and declining soil organic carbon and degrading soil health (SOC) (Lal, 2015;Cuevas et al., 2019).Situated in Central Asia and part of the Aral Sea Basin, Uzbekistan is one of the world's most seriously affected countries in terms of landdegradation, desertification, and abandonment (Hopmans et al., 2021). Here, more than 65% of arable land (Nkonya et al., 2012;Robinson, 2016; UNEP/GRID-Arendal, 2005) and more than 90% of the total irrigated land (Akramkhanov et al., 2018) is currently affected by various levels of salinization. About 20,000 ha of irrigated lands are lost due to salinity and invariably abandoned every year (Toderich et al., 2008). Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), rice (Oryza sativa), and maize (Zea mays L) are the predominant crops grown in 1.2, 1.4, 0.4, and 0.42 million ha areas, respectively (FAOSTAT, 2021). These crops are mostly grown under the RWS and CWS (Devkota, 2011a(Devkota, , 2011b)). As reported elsewhere, poor land and improper water management are the most important factors threatening the productivity and sustainability of those crops in Uzbekistan. Farmers in the country apply large quantities of irrigation water (>50,000 m 3 for rice and > 5000 m 3 ha − 1 for each cotton, maize, and wheat) (Devkota, 2011a(Devkota, , 2011b) ) with salinity ranging from 1 to 15 dS m − 1 . Excessive use of irrigation water raises groundwater tables (GWT), which has led to increasing secondary soil salinization, where 67% of the fields have GWT above the threshold level, which induces secondary salinization (Forkutsa et al., 2009;Ibrakhimov et al., 2007). Therefore, proper soil and water management strategies have been needed for sustaining crop production in such areas.In recent years, many attempts have been made from different sectors to prevent and manage soil salinity and rehabilitate the degrading land. Sustainable land and water management practices, such as CA practices (minimal soil disturbance, proper crop rotation, and the optimal amount of crop residues retention) combined with efficient irrigation water management, minimize the adverse effect of conventional practices (CT) (Devkota et al., 2015a(Devkota et al., , 2015b(Devkota et al., , 2015c;;Ondrasek et al., 2014;Sayre and Hobbs, 2004). CA-based practices counterbalance and combat soil salinity (Carrijo et al., 2017). However, soil salinity dynamics differ under different cropping systems, types of crop grown, amount and quality of irrigation water application, and adopted cultivation practices (Chen et al., 2010;Zhang et al., 2012).Hydrological models can provide a useful complement to the experimental results. The hydrological model, Hydrus-1/2/3D ( Šimůnek et al., 2013) has been used extensively in a wide range of irrigation management applications (furrow, surface, and subsurface pressurized irrigations). It has been applied in the evaluation of soil hydraulic properties, boundary condition, irrigation frequency, amount and discharge rate, water quality/salinity, the timing of nutrient application, drainage system, and crop type for optimizing soil and water management practices (Ajdary et al., 2007;Egea et al., 2016;Hopmans, 2008;Hopmans et al., 2006;Jian-jun et al., 2015;Ramos et al., 2012;Rezaei et al., 2016Rezaei et al., , 2017Rezaei et al., , 2021;;Selim et al., 2018). It can be used to quantify the long-term impacts of several agronomic innovations on soil and water productivity and sustainability.Sustainability is improvement in economic, environmental, social and institutional indicators (Corsin et al., 2007) for \"meeting society's present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs\" (Bell and Morse, 2012;Ghelichkhan et al., 2018). Maintaining and improving the sustainability of degrading irrigated drylands is important for achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) (UNDP, 2017). The advantages of agronomic innovations for improving individual indicators have been reported (Devkota et al., 2013a(Devkota et al., , 2013b(Devkota et al., , 2015b(Devkota et al., , 2015c)). However, as soil salinity impacts soils, plants, and the environment, the holistic assessment of the innovations/ technologies is essential to assess their potential to improve the sustainability of crop production (Hopmans et al., 2021). Systematic quantification and comparison of multiple sustainability indicators, comparing different cropping systems, crops, and agronomic management practices, provide adaptation guidelines and ways-forward to improve the sustainability of degrading irrigated drylands. In addition, in many circumstances, coupling experimental, simulation, and multicriteria approaches are needed to improve sustainability. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine the potential of CA-based practices (no-tillage, crop rotations, and residue retention) coupled with water-saving alternative-wet and dry (AWD) irrigation, and N fertilizer rates for improving sustainability of crop production in saltaffected irrigated drylands of Central Asia.The study was conducted at a field in the Khorezm region, south of the Aral Sea in Uzbekistan (60.05 • -61.39 • N and 41.13 • -42.02 • E, 100 m asl), an area representative of the degrading saline irrigated arid and semi-arid region. The region has an arid continental climate, with an average annual precipitation of less than 100 mm, and the potential evapotranspiration always greatly exceeds precipitation (Forkutsa, 2006). The soil of the experimental site had Calcaric Gleysols \"Meadow soil\", which corresponds to Xerosols and anthropogenic Fluvisols according to USDA classification (Vlek et al., 2001), and is characterized by a shallow GWT often with elevated groundwater salinity (GWS), and salinization in the upper soil profile. During the crop growing period from March to October, the groundwater table rises up to 1.2-1.4 m and drops to about 1.8 m, and this rise in groundwater increases soil salinity by adding 3.5-14 t salt ha − 1 y − 1 (Ibragimov et al., 2007). The inherent soil organic carbon and fertility of Khorezmian soil is rather low. The experimental field had medium to high soil mineral nitrogen (N), NH 4 -N ranging from 4.4-6.5 and NO 3 -N 3.4-5.3 mg kg − 1 , low total soil N (0.04-0.05%), low SOC (0.30-0.36%), and a moderate range of available phosphorus 23.9-27.9 mg kg − 1 and exchangeable potassium (76.8-98.5 mg kg − 1 ). Soil salinity in the region corresponds to the electrical conductivity of saturated soil extract (ECe) of 6-16 dS m − 1 at the top 30 cm soil profile.Experiments in RWS and CWS were conducted during 2008-2010 at Cotton Research Institute (CRI), Urgench, in the Khorezm region of Uzbekistan. All abbreviations used in this manuscript are described in Table SI1.The experiment in this system was implemented with seven treatments in 2008 and eight treatments in 2009 using a randomized complete block design (Fig. SI1; Table 1). The treatments for RWS were from the combination of irrigation methods, i.e., AWD and continuous flood irrigation (FI); and three tillage methods, for example, raised permanent bed (PB) and zero tillage (ZT) planting on flat land with three levels of crop residue retention, i.e., residue harvested (R0), 50% residue retention (R50) and 100% residue retention (R100) (Table 1). In the conventional practice (third tillage method), previous crop residue was removed, then the soil was levelled after dry then wet soil ploughing (puddling). In WSR-FI, 24-h soaked and 48-h incubated pre-germinated seed was directly broadcast seeded into 5-10 cm standing water and, after rice emergence, FI keeping 5-15 cm standing water throughout the growing season (as in the farmers' practice) was applied. In the other six treatments, i.e., PB and ZT with three residue rates, rice was dry direct-seeded (DSR) using no-till seeder and AWD irrigation was applied (collectively called DSR-AWD (or CA) for those 6 treatments). In treatments of DSR-AWD, rice was flood-irrigated when the average soil matric potential at 20 cm depth was 20 kPa, which corresponds with the volumetric soil water content 5-10% below the field capacity. In RWS, surface-seeded wheat (SSW; broadcasting of sprouted wheat into the standing rice field 25 days before rice harvest) was grown in all treatments. Experimental details have been presented in Devkota et al. (2013bDevkota et al. ( , 2015a)).Twelve treatments − (Fig. SI1, Table 1) in each crop (cotton, wheat, and maize in rotation) from the combination of two tillage methods, i.e., permanent bed, PB (also called CA), and CT; two residue levels (residue retained, R100, and residue harvested, R0) and three N application rates (no N application (N0), and 50% less than and 50% more than the recommended rates) (Table 1) − were evaluated. The CA practices include raised permanent bed planting, crop planted/ seeded using a tractor-drawn seed drill machine under untilled conditions and residue retention. The experiments were implemented in a split-plot design with tillage methods in the main plot and six treatments from a factorial combination of three N and two residue rates randomized in sub-plot (Devkota et al., 2013c(Devkota et al., , 2015b(Devkota et al., , 2015c)). In the residue retained treatments (R100), 3 t ha − 1 wheat residues from an external CT-R100-N125 CT-R100-N100 CT-R100-N100 12 CT-R100-N250 CT-R100-N200 CT-R100-N200 ¶Note: PB=Permanent bed also called conservation agriculture (CA), CT = conventional practices, R0 = no residue retention, R100 = maximum possible amount of residue retention; N = Nitrogen rate (kg ha − 1 ). source (initial external application), 6.6 t ha − 1 cotton residues, and 6.88 t ha − 1 wheat residues were retained during the cotton, wheat, and maize seasons, respectively (Table 2). In all residue harvested (R0) treatments, residues were removed from the field as per farmers' practice in both CA and CT plots. In CT plots, the soil was ploughed 2-3 times before seeding, crops were harvested from the base, and all residues were removed.Experiments were conducted in four replications, with an operational plot size of 480 m 2 for RWS and 550 m 2 for CWS. The RWS experiment was implemented for two seasons of each crop (2 years) and cotton-wheat-maize in CWS three crops. Once established in 2008, DSR-AWD treatments in RWS and CA treatments in CWS were permanently adopted.All crops were seeded using standard and recommended crop management practices. Rice variety Nukus-2, wheat Krasnodar-99, cotton Khorezm-127, and maize Maldoshki (hybrid) were used. The crop growing duration was June-October for rice; wheat October-May; cotton May-October; and maize June-September. Crop management practices adopted for both RWS and CWS are presented in Table 2, and details of these are explained in Devkota et al. (2015a) and (Devkota et al., 2013a(Devkota et al., , 2013b) ) for RWS, and Devkota et al. (2013cDevkota et al. ( , 2015bDevkota et al. ( , 2015c) ) for CWS.In both experiments, the amount of irrigation water applied was measured using standard Trapezoidal Cipolletti weirs (0.5 m crest width) with automated data loggers (Divers) for level measurement (DL/N-70), which measured the water level above the Chipolletti crest at a 1-min interval. The rate of water discharged (in m s − 1 ) from the respective Cipolletti crest was calculated based on the equation provided by Kraatz and Mahajan (1975).To assess the salt dynamics in the soil profile, soil samples were collected from the pre-determined sampling points for each plot (six points were fixed in each plot) during the entire crop rotation cycle in both systems.2.2.3.2.1. RWS. Soil samples were collected at 19 different dates from a rice field in 2008, 11 times from a wheat field in 2009, and times from a rice field in 2009. Soil samples were collected from 0 to 10, 10-20, 20-30, 30-50, and 50-80 cm depths before irrigation using a tube augur-sized 3 cm in diameter.2.2.3.2.2. CWS. Samples were collected from 0 to 10, 10-20, 20-30, 30-60, and 60-90 cm soil depths one day before irrigation and at each crop harvest. The samples were collected at 11 dates each during cotton and wheat season and 7 dates during maize season. In the PB system in both cropping systems, soil samples were collected from both tops of the bed and the center of the furrow to obtain the average salinity of the bed system.A total of 6083 soil samples in RWS and 4749 samples in CWS were analyzed. In both systems, the collected soil samples were analyzed for gravimetric soil moisture content and electrical conductivity (EC p ), which is the EC of 1:1 water: soil paste. The measured EC p was converted to the international standard EC value of the saturated soil extract (ECe; Rhoades et al., 1999), and derived from the equation as provided by Akramkhanov et al. (2009):To measure GWS and GWT, nine piezometers, i.e., six in the section of DSR-AWD irrigation and three in the WSR-FI, were installed (Fig. SI1), and 32 observations during rice 2008, 62 during wheat and 109 during rice 2009, were taken in RWS. In CWS, across the experimental field, 20 piezometers were randomly installed up to 2.75 m depth and 16, 20, and 21 observations were collected during cotton, wheat, and maize growing season, respectively. Groundwater measurement was not available during the freezing period (November to March) when the GWT depth dropped below the depth of the piezometers. Water samples were collected from each piezometer before and after irrigation in both RWS and CWS. GWT was measured using a hand-operated sounding apparatus with acoustic and light signals (Eijkelkamp Co.) and the groundwater was analyzed for ECe with a Hanna instrument (HI-98312 EC) in dS m − 1 .Simulation of water flow and solute transport which are assumed to be in the vertical direction in the vadose zone, was carried out for three crop seasons in both systems using Hydrus-1D version 4.17. The model uses the 1-D Richards equation (Eq. 2) for vertical water flow:Where, θ is the volumetric water content (L 3 L − 3 ), t is time (T), z is the radial and vertical space coordinate taken positive downward (L), K(h) is the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity function (LT − 1 ), h is the pressure head (L), and S(h) represents a sink term (L 3 L − 3 T − 1 ), defined as the volume of water removed from a unit volume of soil per unit time.The model computes the solute transport using standard Hydrus solute transport module in a variably-saturated rigid porous medium in the liquid phase with root nutrient uptake as:where θ is the volumetric water content (L 3 L − 3 ), c, c and c r are solute concentration in the liquid phase (M L − 3 ), solid phase (M M − 3 ) and sink term (M L − 3 ), respectively, t is time (T), z is the radial and vertical space coordinate taken positive downward (L), ρ b is the soil bulk density (M L − 3 ), q is the volumetric flux density (LT − 1 ), the subscript k represents chemical species of major ions, and D represents the hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient (L 2 T − 1 ). The standard module takes into account the interaction between the liquid and solid phases of EC (Ramos et al., 2011).Due to the high fluctuation of GWT, the simulated soil profile in the model extended to 200 cm depth and was divided into two functional layers (0-60 and 60-200 cm). To solve Richards' equation (Eq. 2), the Brooks-Corey soil hydraulic model was used. The initial values of hydraulic properties were obtained from a neural network prediction implemented into the model based on soil texture and bulk density. The hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient was imposed as one-tenth of soil profile depth, i.e., 20 cm 2 day − 1 (Ramos et al., 2011). The initial soil water content distribution was adjusted uniformly and set to 0.20 cm 3 cm − 3 through all soil profiles. The EC of soil was used as the initial condition of solute concentrations of each layer. The upper boundary condition for water flow and solute transport were imposed from measured data of rainfall, applied irrigation water, potential evapotranspiration (ET o ), leaf area index (LAI), EC of applied water (cTop), and EC of groundwater (cBot). The meteorological data were obtained from the experimental station. ET o was calculated based on the FAO Penman-Monteith equation on a daily basis (Allen et al., 1998) using meteorological data. LAI was derived from the measured data from Devkota (2011aDevkota ( , 2011b)). The variable pressure head bottom boundary was imposed by setting measured groundwater table data. The Feddes' model (Feddes et al., 1978) as the sink term of Richards' equation Eq.(2), S(h) was used for the quantification of potential root water uptake and water stress as:Where, R(x) is the root distribution function (cm), T p is potential transpiration (cm h − 1 ), and w (h) is the water stress response function (0 ≤ w (h) ≤ 1) which prescribes the reduction in uptake that occurs due to drought/salinity stress. Crop-specific values of this reduction function were chosen from the default Hydrus data set.2.3.3.1. Model calibration. For accurate parameter estimation, a long period with several drying and wetting events was selected (from May 2008 to October 2009), i.e., two growing seasons as suggested by Rezaei et al. (2016). The model was calibrated for both RWS (480 days) and CWS (532 days). Time series observed data, i.e., 392 soil water content and EC records for RWS and 156 records for CWS, were used for four observation points/depths (as data for inverse solution). In the calibration, we optimized all hydraulic parameters as well as the hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient for one CA treatment in each cropping system. Finally, the best performing parameter set − based on performance criteria, non-uniqueness of the parameter sets, and the visual inspection of simulated and observed soil-water content and EC data − was selected for validation using independent data from conventional practice treatment.The performance of Hydrus-1D in simulating water content and EC from the different cultivation systems was evaluated graphically (Rezaei et al., 2016) and a variety of statistics (Neuman et al., 2003). The root-mean-square errors (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R 2 ) are popular and were used to evaluate the difference between observed and simulated values.Where, O and S are observed and simulated values at time/place i, respectively. |e i | is an arithmetic average of the absolute errors.In both systems, the model was run to analyze the impact of quantity and quality of irrigation water on soil salinity.2 To assess the broad-based sustainability of two cropping systems, four different crops, an alternative CA-based system with water-saving irrigation and N rates, and 14 sustainability indicators from economic, environmental and soil health and resilience were assessed (Fig. SI2). Those indicators include: 1. grain yield; 2. net profit; (3-5) nitrogen-, phosphorus-, and potassium-use efficiencies (NUE, PUE, and KUE); 6. water productivity (WP); 7. SOC sequestration; 8. soil salinity (ECe); 9. yield scaled greenhouse gas (GHG) emission intensity (GHGI); 10. GWT depth; 11. GWS; 12. drainage loss of irrigation water; 13. energy use efficiency (EUE); and 14. mineral nitrogen balance, were computed. The detail of the computation methods of all these indicators has been explained in Supplementary Information Appendix I.The GHGI was computed for all four crops and all treatments considering three components of GHG emission: (I) CO 2 -equivalent methane emission (in rice only), (II) direct CO 2 -equivalent emission from applied N, P, and K fertilizers; and (III) indirect CO 2 -equivalent emissions from N 2 O emission, N-volatilization, and N-leaching from applied N fertilizers (Supplementary Information Appendix I). The results expressed in GHGI (kg CO 2 equivalent emissions t − 1 grain or seed cotton) as suggested by Pittelkow et al. (2014), Sainju et al. (2014) and Snyder et al. (2009).The EUE was computed for all four crops and both cropping systems, as the ratio of energy output from grain or seed cotton and straw/stover divided by the total energy input in all production operations.Total energy output Total agronomic energy input (9) Partial mineral N balance was computed from the difference between output (uptake + mineral N left at harvest) and input (initial mineral N + N applied from fertilizers), the positive value indicates N loss. The amount of N fertilizers applied, initial and after crop harvest soil N content, and crop N uptake were measured in all crops in both cropping systems. The detail computation procedure of mineral N balance has been explained in Devkota et al. (2013a).Repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted for salinity measured over time during the crop growing period using R version 4.03. Linear regression was used to quantify the difference in soil salinity over time on different crops, cropping systems, CA-based practices, and irrigation management. The daily soil salinity and volumetric water content at 0-90 cm soil depth, and GWS and GWT dynamics as affected by CA-based practices, were simulated for CWS, and affected by water management practices (WSR-FI vs. DSR-AWD) were simulated for RWS. Multi-criteria trade-off analysis among sustainability indicators was used for the broad-based assessment of different cropping systems, crops, CA-based practices, water management methods, and N fertilizer rates for their potential for managing salinity in degrading irrigated drylands.Soil salinity varied across the sampling time in both cropping systems (Table SI2). The initial soil salinity at the top 30 cm soil depth decreased by 22% after leaching and laser-guided land leveling (just before the start of the experiment) (Fig. 1A). Compared to the initial level (3.28 dS m − 1 ), the soil salinity decreased in both cropping systems, while the reduction rate was higher in RWS (by 28%) than CWS. In RWS, the significant crop x treatment x sampling time, indicating salinity among the treatments, varied significantly with time and crops grown. In conventional practices (WSR-FI), compared to the initial condition (after leaching and before rice seeding), the salinity decreased by 48% in first rice and by 16% from wheat to second rice. In CWS, soil salinity was the highest (p < 0.05) in cotton, followed by wheat and then lowest in Greenhouese gas emisison intensity (GHGI) = Total CO 2 equivalent emission (kg) Grain or seed cotton yield (t)maize, where, compared to the initial level, it increased by 4% in first cotton, but decreased by 25% from wheat to maize. In CWS, CT had significantly higher salinity than CA and residue retention (R100) had significantly low salinity than residue removal (R0).In RWS, salinity was lower in the WSR-FI based system than under DSR-AWD, while in CWS, except in cotton, it was lower in the CA-based system than under CT (Fig. 1B). In RWS, compared to WSR-FI, an average of DSR-AWD (6 treatments) had higher salinity by 41% in rice season and 30% in wheat season. In 2009, WSR-AWD comparison with treatments of DSR-AWD showed salinity levels in those treatments were similar. In CWS, after three crops, CA practice (PB + residue retention) reduced salinity level by 3% in wheat and by 9% in maize compared to CT. The PB system without residue retention (R0) had a higher (+17 to +66%) soil salinity on the top of the bed than CT. Salinity level on the top of the bed increased by (+62 to +69%) than in the furrow when crop residues were removed. However, the bed system with residue retention reduced salinity by 15-31% compared to residue harvest (Fig. 2A). Similarly, in CA-based CWS, salinity level was reduced by 28-46% under N-applied treatments compared to the treatment without N application (Fig. 2B).As the soil profile was divided into two layers, all the soil hydraulic parameters and the hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient of each layer were optimized (Table 3). The results of parameters optimized and its performance are shown in Tables 3, 4. There was a close matching of Fig. 2. Soil salinity dynamics as affected by different water management, tillage and residue treatments in rice-wheat (A) and cotton-wheat system (B). WSR-FI = wet-direct seeded rice with continuous flood irrigation; WSR-AWD = wet-direct seeded rice (puddled) with alternate wet and dry irrigation; ZT = zero tillage flat planting; PB = permanent bed; R0 = residue removed; R50 = 50% residue retention; R100 = 100% residue retention; SSW = surface-seeded wheat, all wheat in RWS was SSW after rice; CA = conservation agriculture; CT = conventional practices. N(med)= medium N rate. The 1st bar (with slanting lines) in each panel are the conventional (control treatment).Initial and optimized values of hydraulic properties and the hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient (D) of RWS and CWS rotation systems. θ r , θ s are residual and saturated water content, respectively; α and n are shape parameters for the Brooks and Corey equation. K s and L denote the saturated hydraulic conductivity and Tortuosity parameter in the conductivity function respectively. Parameters θ r (cm 3 cm − 3 ) θ s (cm 3 cm − 3 ) wheat, maize, and cotton). This suggests the model performed satisfactorily and predicted well for the soil salinity level and water content (Figs. 3,4); however, some fluctuation can be observed. Larger differences in simulated and observed EC can be seen in RWS compared to CWS. That is logical due to puddling where the soil was always close to saturation in rice field. In RWS, soil salinity was increased at the end of the wheat season (Fig. 3). In CWS, soil salinity was increased as soil water content decreased during the cotton season, but it was reduced significantly during wheat and maize seasons. Overall, the model performs well for the upper layer and its observation depths where the plant roots are concentrated, which is consequently the most critical in terms of irrigation and nutrition management. The validation results, using the optimized hydraulic parameters and hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient values (Table 3) of the calibration under different upper (rainfall and water supply, ET o , LAI) and lower (groundwater depth) boundary conditions, are shown in Figures 3 and 4. The results of parameter optimization performance, according to performance criteria, are shown in Table 5. Similar to Rezaei et al. (2016), model performance during the calibration was superior to the validation at all observation depths, particularly in RWS. The model underpredicted soil water content and consequently overpredicted soil EC in CWS, while soil water content was overpredicted and EC was underpredicted in RWS. These differences may be attributed to a large number of optimized parameters, different parameters values in the calibration and evaluation data, and also seasonal changes in soil hydraulic properties.During the entire crop growing period, GWT was shallower (1.14 m) by 25% in RWS than in CWS (1.52 m) (Fig. 5A). In crop comparison, GWT was 23% shallower in rice than in cotton during the summer season, while during the winter season, wheat in RWS had 7% shallower GWT than wheat in CWS. The coefficient of variation (CV) for GWT was higher in rice (37%) than in other crops (11-12%). In rice, variation in GWT was higher in DSR-AWD by 8% than in WSR-FI. Both simulated and measured results showed that GWT and GWS in rice were affected due to water management practices, where DSR-AWD had deeper GWT and higher GWS.Groundwater salinity was decreased with an increase in irrigation amount, where it was higher in CWS by 1.16 dS m − 1 (64%) than in RWS (1.83 dS m − 1 ) (Fig. 5B). Similar to GWT, variation in GWS was higher in RWS (CV-27%) than in CWS (CV-16%). Simulation results confirmed a significant increment in GWT and GWS in wheat after rice in RWS than in wheat after cotton in CWS. Irrespective of the treatment effect, both measured and simulated results found that soil salinity at the top 30 cm soil profile was higher (by 81%; 2.86 dS m − 1 ) in CWS than RWS (1.58 dS m − 1 ). Across the soil depth, soil salinity was higher by 73% at the top 10 cm, 92% at 20 cm, 81% at 30 cm, 8% at transition zone (80-90 cm) in CWS than in RWS (Figs. 3, 4). During the crop growing period, salinity level at all soil layers, including transition zone and at groundwater, was highest in cotton − followed by wheat and maize in CWS and the lowest in rice in RWS. The simulated result clearly proved that DSR-AWD rice had a higher salinity than WSR-FI at all soil depths. As the model does not have the option to simulate salt dynamics due to bed configuration and residue retention, we did not simulate the effect of CA on salinity dynamics.Results from daily water balance simulation (Fig. SI3) showed that a measurable amount of water input (irrigation + rainfall) was lost through sub-surface drainage, where 74% of total water input was drained from RWS (a significant amount of water was lost from WSR-FI (92%) followed by DSR-AWD treatments (65%), and no loss from wheat), while no drainage losses occurred from CWS (all three crops). The root water uptake in RWS was 794 mm in WSR-FI and 768 mm in DSR-AWD, while it was 1067 mm in CWS, across three crops in both systems (Fig. SI3).Results of different scenarios of the modeling approaches are shown in Fig. SI4 (for RWS) and Fig. SI5 (for CWS). With the current situation and conditions (same upper and bottom boundary conditions) − i.e., scenario 1, when the model ran for 10 crop rotations − unsurprisingly no significant changes in water content and soil EC can be seen in both cultivation systems. In RWS, when water application was reduced by half, the soil EC did not change significantly (only increased slightly). However, the quality of irrigation water has a significant consequence on predicted EC values when it is doubled (scenario 4). It can be noted that increasing ETo and decreasing water quality increased soil EC, especially in the upper layer. Similar results can be seen for CWS. Significant differences in changing soil EC by varying irrigation water quality and ETo are obvious in RWS compared to CWS. Overall, results of the scenario assessment indicate that soil salinity can be increased by 78% and 66% in RWS and CWS respectively when doubling irrigation water salinity and increasing ETo by 20% (Figs. SI4 and SI5). Under CT systems, the comparison of three crop seasons (two rice and one wheat in RWS, and cotton, wheat, and maize in CWS) showed that RWS had a higher equivalent yield (+23%), net profit (82%), SOC sequestration (+15%), and lower soil salinity (− 72%), with the trade-off of lower water productivity (− 150%), NUE (− 41%), EUE (− 31%) with higher GHGI emission (+223%) than in CWS (Fig. 6A; Table 5). Also, a significant amount of irrigation water drained out from the rice field which raised the GWT to a shallow level. Rice had the highest net profit followed by wheat (CWS), wheat (RWS), cotton, and the lowest in maize. CA practices (no-tillage bed planting with residue retention) with medium N rate had significantly higher positive sustainability indicators in CWS, where CA had high yield (+19%), net profit (+20%), WP (+27%), NUE (+20%), PUE (+18%), KUE (+20%), SOC (+456%), and EUE (+35%), with 7% low soil salinity and 12% lower GHGI than under CT (Fig. 6C). Also, the trade-offs among different indicators in different resource-saving practices in rice observed that WSR-FI had a trade-off for higher yield and profit with the lowest WP (− 51%), GHGI (− 48%), and EUE (− 24%) lower than DSR-AWD (Fig. 6D). In contrast to CWS, the CA-based practices in RWS (i.e., DSR-AWD-R100) had the lowest yield, N-, P-, and K-use efficiency, and profitability, but the highest amount of SOC sequestration with the highest GHGI.The trade-off among different sustainability indicators across three N rates in cotton, wheat, and maize crops showed an appropriate N rate is key for improving the sustainability indicators − wherein all three crops majority of the sustainability indicators were at the lowest level without N fertilizer application (0 kg ha − 1 N), but indicators improved with the application of high N rates. The response of N fertilizer rate was higher in CA-based practices than under CT. The highest N rate improved most of the sustainability indicators in wheat and maize crops, while the medium N rate (except carbon sequestration) improved in cotton (Fig. 7). In all three crops in both establishment methods, medium N rate had the highest NUE, while the highest N rate had the highest PUE and KUE and SOC sequestration potential, indicating increasing N application improved yield and biomass production through the better uptake and utilization of P and K. In all three crops and both establishment methods, medium N rate had consistently the lowest salinity while the lowest N rate had the highest salinity. Residue retention did not have an effect in cotton (might be due to transition season from CT to CA), while in wheat and maize, it increased yield (+10%), WP (+10%), SOC sequestration (+355%), and EUE (+16%), while reducing soil salinity (− 16%) and GHGI (− 15%). Even without residue retention, wheat and maize crops with PB increased yield (+18%), SOC sequestration (+22%), NUE, PUE, and KUE (+ from 18 to 22%), EUE (+38%) with reduced GHGI (− 18%), but with an increment of salinity (+20%) compared to CT.Our results from the mixed-method approach clearly indicated that the sustainability of salt-affected irrigated drylands can be improved through the combination of a better choice of crop and cropping system, crop-specific adoption of CA-based management, optimal use of irrigation water (amount and quality), and optimal N fertilizer management. These practices not only reduced soil salinity but also increased yield, profitability, and SOC sequestration (Figs. 6, 7). In the irrigated drylands, improving sustainability with better soil salinity management is vital for achieving SDG goals, such as #2, 6, 13, and 15 (Singh, 2021;UNDP, 2017). To meet increasing food demand, these drylands need to be managed while balancing gains in economic, environmental and soilAveraged health and resilience indicators. Our findings help in improving sustainability through prevention and management of degrading soil in irrigated drylands.Soil salinity has been reduced through the optimization of irrigation water (quantity and quality) (Figs. SI4 and SI5) and the adoption of CAbased practices (minimum soil disturbance + residue retention) (Figs. 1, 2). Reduced water application lowered GWT depth (Fig. 5) and decreased sub-surface drainage loss of water (Fig. SI3). Similarly, permanent soil cover under CA minimized the increasing soil salinity level by reducing evaporation loss of water from the soil surface and minimized secondary soil salinization (Devkota et al., 2015a;Hasan et al., 2015;Kienzler et al., 2012). Reduced irrigation application (Nassah et al., 2018;Wang et al., 2019), decreased evaporative loss of water (Hou et al., 2016;Wang et al., 2019), and controlled GWT depth and GWS level (Soppe and Ayars, 2003), have been reported as the sustainable and rehabilitating technologies for salt-affected irrigated drylands.Lower soil salinity in RWS than in CWS in this study is mostly due to the high amount of water application (irrigation water salinity 1.2 to 2.4 dS m − 1 ). However, a high amount of water application shallowed GWT depth (Fig. 5) and increased sub-surface drainage loss (Fig. SI3), which enhances secondary soil salinization. The shallow GWT (Fig. 5) showed both systems might worsen secondary salinization, while the chance of worsening GWT is higher with RWS. Salt accumulation by soil evaporation and transpiration is generally higher when the GWT is less than 1.5 m below the soil surface (Hopmans et al., 2021). Furthermore, RWS had a lower irrigation water use efficiency (mainly in rice; 7% in WSR-FI and 23% in DSR-AWD) (Table 5), with a significant amount of water loss through sub-surface drainage (Fig. SI3) than in CWS. Also, in long-term simulation (Fig. SI4), RWS is considered an unsustainable system as it enhances soil profile and groundwater salinity if continuously practiced >10 years with current production practices. All these findings indicated that RWS is more vulnerable to salinization by enhancing secondary salinization compared to CWS.The water-saving method of rice cultivation (DSR-AWD) helped to reduce irrigation amount and sub-surface drainage loss by more than one-third (Fig. SI3) and increased water productivity, but had a trade-off with soil salinity, productivity, and profitability (Fig. 6D). A significant amount of water loss from the DSR-AWD (PB and ZT) also suggests the proposed alternative establishment method (DSR) and the water-saving irrigation (AWD) is inefficient in improving irrigation efficiency in rice. However, as DSR-AWD is cost-saving technology, upon the availability of suitable salt-tolerant aerobic rice varieties, it can be an alternative option in a water-scarce environment with low drained soil (Radanielson et al., 2018). Bed planting without retaining the crop residue as surface mulch increased soil salinity level in both RWS and CWS (Fig. 2). This could be due to the reduction in surface evaporation with surface mulch in residue retained treatment, whereas in RWS, residue retention reduced surface evaporation by 123 and 53 mm during rice and wheat seasons, respectively, compared to residue harvest.The simulated long-term scenario results (6 scenarios in RWS and 4 scenarios in CWS) demonstrated that irrigation water salinity (both canal and groundwater) and amount are key for the long-term sustainability of the irrigated drylands for minimizing salinization and land degradation. The simulation results, while doubling salinity of water input and increased evapotranspiration (Figs. SI4, SI5), showed climate change, global warming, and human-induced activities (over fertilizer/ solute application, mismanagement in irrigation amount and quality, and improper cropping systems) can further worsen soil salinization. Irrigation using groundwater or surface water with salinity levels higher than the soil salinity is risky, and a policy on the threshold of irrigation water salinity and restriction in the application of higher salinity irrigation water than soil salinity is required.The trends of declining freshwater availability, increasing salinity of fresh and groundwater, raising water table, and worsening drainage systems are increasing in irrigated drylands of the Aral Sea Basin (Kulmatov et al., 2020;Stavi et al., 2021), South Asia (Bhatt et al., 2021;Timsina and Connor, 2001), India (Singh, 2009), China (Huang et al., 2016;Li et al., 2014;Siyu et al., 1996), Vietnam (Nguyen et al., 2014), Fig. 5. Measured and simulated (Hydrus-1D) groundwater table (m) in rice-wheat system (A), cotton-wheat system (B) and groundwater salinity (dS m − 1 ) in ricewheat system (C) and cotton-wheat system (D) in 2008-2009. WSR-FI = wet-direct seeded rice with flood irrigation; DSR-AWD = dry-direct seeded rice with alternate wet and dry irrigation; CT = conventional practices. The GWT depth is the averaged value from 6 piezometers in the DSR-AWD and from 3 piezometers in the WSR-FI in RWS and from 20 piezometers in CWS.Pakistan (Syed et al., 2021), Mediterranean region (Shahid et al., 2018;Tomaz et al., 2020), and several other irrigated dryland region and countries (Hopmans et al., 2021). In those regions, excessive use of irrigation water with marginal quality, rising water table, increasing salinity of irrigation water, climate change and rainfall variability are increasing risk of crop production, and the findings from this study might offer a risk minimization opportunities in those areas. In such conditions, secondary salinization can be minimized by: (i) AWD irrigation with a further reduced volume of irrigation water using cropdemand based surface, sub-surface, drip, mulched drip or sprinkler irrigation (Hopmans et al., 2021); (ii) adaptation of alternative crops other than rice, which requires low irrigation water and tolerates salinity; (iii) adapting cropping systems with salt-tolerant crop species; (iv) developing efficient drainage schemes in drylands, as reported by Jafari-Talukolaee et al. (2016) in Northern Iran; (v) and an improved sub-surface drainage system coupled with improved agricultural water management ('integrated on-farm drainage management'), as reported by Hopmans et al. (2021) to reduce the rate of soil salinization in California, USA.High productivity, profitability, and EUE with a reduced environmental footprint (GHGI) enhance sustainability in crop production (Devkota et al., 2020;Gathala et al., 2020). Fourteen performance indicators computed and compared in this study clearly showed the potential for improving sustainability through accelerated adoption of integrated soil, water and other agronomic practices. The increased system productivity, profitability, WP, NUE, PUE, KUE, SOC sequestration, and EUE with lower soil salinity (− 7%) and yield scaled GHGI (− 14%) than in CT practice (Fig. 6C), indicates that sustainability of existing CWS can be improved with the adoption of CA-based practices. In RWS, DSR with AWD improved water productivity, reduced water input, improved EUE and SOC sequestration, and lowered GWT depth. However, it could not prove superior to WSR-FI in yield and profitability, indicating WSR-FI still can be the choice if water is available as a free gift. However, in light of predicted future conditions regarding declining water resources in the Aral Sea Basin, rice cultivation with flood irrigation cannot be advised. Under the water-scarce conditions, low water productivity (− 147%); NUE (− 70%); EUE (− 46%) but with high GHGI (+220%), and increased GWT by 25% in RWS than in CWS (Fig. 6A), might offset the positive benefits from RWS, i.e., higher profitability with reduced salinity. In the drylands, long-term sustainability is more important than short-term economic benefit (e.g., rice production) (Schwilch et al., 2014). The high profitability of RWS was due to the higher yield and price of rice than cotton. A higher amount of SOC-sequestration in RWS was due to a higher amount of residue/straw Fig. 6. Trade-offs among sustainability indicators between RWS and CWS (A), among different crops (B), among conventional (CT) and conservation agriculture (CA)-based practices in cotton-wheat system at low and high N rates (C), and among the conventional (wet-direct seeded) method of crop establishment and flood irrigation (WSR-FI), dry-direct seeded with water-saving irrigation (DSR-AWD) with two residue rates (0 and 100%), and conventional method of crop establishment but with water-saving irrigation (WSR-AWD) in rice in rice-wheat system (D). Data combined over three crops (cotton, wheat, and maize in cotton-wheat and for two years in rice-wheat system. WP = water productivity; NUE = Nitrogen use efficiency; PUE = Phosphorus use efficiency; KUE = Potassium use efficiency; GHGI = GHG emission intensity (kg CO 2 t − 1 grain); SSDrain. = Sub-surface drainage of the irrigation water; SOC=Soil organic carbon sequestration (kg C ha − 1 ); ECe = Soil Salinity (ECe dS m − 1 ); GWT = Groundwater table depth (m); GWS = Groundwater salinity (dS m − 1 ); EUE = Energy-use efficiency; and N loss = Loss of mineral N (kg ha − 1 ). production by the rice crop than cotton. Although SOC is the major indicator of soil health (Giongo et al., 2020;Hopmans et al., 2021), higher SOC-sequestration through rice requires at least 3 times higher water input than in cotton (Devkota et al., 2013b(Devkota et al., , 2013c)).In crop-wise comparison (Fig. 6B), wheat (winter season) crop had the highest number (6) of positive indicators (yield, WP, NUE, KUE, SOC-sequestration, EUE) with the lowest GHGI, indicating its better resilience. Water productivity is the key indicator for crop production in the drylands, and it will further be important in the context of future climate change (Shi et al., 2021). Among the three summer crops (rice, cotton, and maize), rice had the highest profitability but lower value among other indicators. On the other hand, maize had the lowest value for the majority of sustainability indicators, suggesting cotton is still the best among the three crops. However, in comparison to other crops, an increase in soil salinity was seen with an increase in cotton cultivation (Figs. 1, SI5). Therefore, technologies mitigating salinity problems, for Fig. 7. Trade-offs among sustainability indicators across three N (no, medium, and high N rates) in cotton, wheat and maize crops under conservation agriculture (CA; A) and conventional practices (CT; B) practices in cotton, wheat and maize crops in cotton-wheat system in Khorezm region of Uzbekistan. Sub-surface drainage, groundwater table depth and groundwater salinity were not plotted as these indicators were not measured across three N rates. For the description of the figure symbols, Fig. 6. instance, CA with residue retention, or alternate-skip-furrow irrigation (Devkota et al., 2015c), are suggested for the sustainability of cotton planting in the region. Similar findings on the improvement of sustainability with a reduced environmental footprint (GHGI) using CA-based management practices were also reported by Jat et al. (2020) in the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Further, lower GHGI or yield-scaled emissions with high EUE with CA-based practices in CWS indicated gains in agricultural productivity is also possible.NUE in rice remained critically low compared to other crops (Fig. 7), indicating the need for better N management for improving sustainability. In CWS, the optimal N rate increased many of the sustainability indicators and helped minimize the soil salinity (Fig. 7). However, under the highest N rate, 83 and 35 kg ha − 1 mineral N was lost from cotton and maize fields (Fig. 6; Table 5) and higher GHGI in CWS indicated that the N rate should be optimized based on the crop demand. A higher N rate alleviated the negative effects induced by salinity stress and helped to improve plant growth and yield by maintaining the integrity of the photosynthesis and chlorophyll inflorescence processes in oat plants in salt-affected areas of Ontario, Canada (Song et al., 2019). It was also reported that N fertilization improved salinity tolerance of cotton (Chen et al., 2010) and wheat (Elgharably et al., 2010), as N plays both nutritional and osmotic roles in saline conditions. The combinations of treatments comprising different cropping systems, crop species, level of irrigation, residue applications, and N fertilizer showed farmers can adopt all practices as a package for better sustainability, or either practice, considering possible trade-offs as well as affordability and acceptability. However, under resource-constrained conditions, the choice of crops and cropping systems using CA-based practices, followed by optimal water and nitrogen management, might be the technologies for consideration for saline conditions.The sustainability of crop production in salt-affected irrigated drylands is becoming challenging and further exacerbated by poor soil, water, and nutrient management. This study sought to understand how CA-based practices, coupled with adaptive management practices such as choice of crop and cropping system, water, and fertilizer management impact the sustainability of crop production in these conditions using mixed-method approaches (field experiments, simulation, and the multi-criteria analysis). Soil salinity dynamics differ with crop and cropping systems: RWS had a lower salinity than CWS. Significantly low WP, EUE, and NUE with high GHGI and a greater sub-surface drainage loss of water input, raised GWT depth and increased the probability of secondary salinization under RWS − indicating that CWS has a higher sustainability index over RWS. In rice, adoption of DSR-AWD technology saved water input, doubled the WP and SOC sequestration, improved EUE, and decreased the probability of secondary salinization, compared to WSR-FI − hence it can be an alternative under the water-scarce condition if RWS is the dominant system. Residue retention was found to be beneficial in the irrigated drylands in both RWS and CWS, where SOC content increased by more than 300%, offering the opportunity to improve soil health. In CWS, CA-based practices (no-tillage and residue retention) reduced salinity level, while CA with optimal N ha − 1 has the greatest potential for improving sustainability with resilience. A better choice of crops and cropping systems, CA-based management practices, appropriate N application rate, and water-saving irrigation, are critical to improving the sustainability of the agricultural production system in the salt-affected degrading irrigated drylands of Central Asia and the regions with similar conditions.","tokenCount":"8526"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1804016628.json b/data/part_2/1804016628.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7e124c51fd14a536daa4d6fc6dc4591fbc30d8bc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1804016628.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"e98a3f955b841b3f21fb959a9b2ca27e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/3aacdaa2-4750-4380-aa86-15c6dd2fc5f7/retrieve","id":"-485549160"},"keywords":["Common bean","canning","hydration coefficient","visual quality","drained weight"],"sieverID":"19850be6-eade-4fa2-83ab-46504f2240d4","pagecount":"39","content":"Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes popular in eastern and central Africa were evaluated to determine their suitability for the canning industry. The genotypes were planted at the National Agricultural Research Laboratories (NARL), Kawanda-Uganda in the second rainy seasons (July-September) of 2015, 2016 and off season of 2017 (November-February). Two samples per genotype were evaluated at the canning facilities at Kawanda and Michigan State University (MSU) using a protocol based on home canning. One sample per genotype from the 2017 harvest was evaluated at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre (AAFC-LRDC) using the industry canning protocol. Data (n=134) was collected on seed moisture content, dry and soaked bean weight, hydration coefficient (HC) and visual quality, including colour retention, appearance, brine clarity, bean splitting and freedom starch/clumps on replicated samples. Additional data on unreplicated samples were collected on 100-seed weight, seed solids for canning, hydration coefficient after soaking (HCS), hydration coefficient after blanching (HCB), drain weight (%), matting, appearance, seed color, texture, and cooking quality traits including hard seed and partially hydrated seed (%) and HC after cooking. Analysis of variance of data from MSU and Kawanda showed significant (P≤0.01) differences among genotypes for the assessed parameters. Majority of the genotypes expressed good soaking ability considering that their HC were above the 1.8 recommended for canning and 28% combined the two mentioned traits with good overall canning quality visual rating. Apart from 26, all other varieties had good HC based on data from Canada. About 24% of genotypes belonging to various market classes consistently combined this trait with good visual quality. The most outstanding genotypes based on these traits included SAB659 (red mottled), MAC44 (red mottled), NABE21 (cream), NABE12C (cream) and VAX5 (cream), KK8 (red mottled), Bihogo (yellow) and VAX4 (black). These genotypes were superior to the white beans: MEXICO 142, Awash1, and Awash Melka, that were considered as high-quality controls. Results indicated that genotypes of diverse backgrounds, with good canning quality traits exist among the currently utilised varieties and breeding lines. This diversity could be exploited for breeding and varietal promotion in the canning industry.Common bean is the most important directly consumed food legume in the world, and it is an important source of dietary protein in Africa where it feeds over 400 million people [1]. The crop is also an important source of energy, fiber and micronutrients especially iron, zinc, thiamin and folic acid [2,3]. Local consumers within the East African region majorly buy beans in a dry unprocessed form, which is 55% cheaper than the least expensive processed bean product [4]. However, the cost is only 15% cheaper if the cost of water and fuel used to prepare and cook dry beans are considered [4]. There is an increasing number of middle-income consumers in East Africa, who are majorly city dwellers and are willing to pay for the convenience of pre-cooked/canned beans. Canned beans are not only convenient in terms of time and fuel but are also safe, and have potential to be combined with other foods thereby creating new product lines especially for improved nutrition. This market segment is expected to expand considering the ever-growing urban populations and the current change in lifestyle [4].To be more relevant to the market, it is important for breeding programs to consider important canning quality traits. These include both processor and consumer preferred traits like short cooking time, high canning yield, bean texture and splitting after cooking, grain size and uniformity [5,6]. Good canning quality is imperative since a variety with poor culinary quality will be rejected by consumers and processors regardless of how agronomically superior it is [7]. It is for this reason that the popular bean germplasm in east and central Africa were evaluated for canning quality to assess the availability of beans possessing these traits among the preferred varieties and to better inform the breeding programs. Some varieties were identified and are being utilized in the canning industry in Ethiopia [8] and Democratic Republic of Congo [9]. In 2014, Warsame and Kimani [10] carried out a similar study, the first of its kind in over 50 years in Kenya and discovered three new small-seeded white beans superior in canning quality traits than the long-preferred variety, MEXICO 142. However, the identified genotypes do not capture the diversity in the market classes especially in grain color and size [10]. Also, the resilience of these genotypes to the prevailing biotic and abiotic stresses is important for canning industry sustainability.The canning quality of common beans is influenced by the genotype, environment and genotype by environment interactions, in addition to the seed handling and processing methods after harvest [5,11,12,13,14,15]. For most of these studies, variation due to genotype seems consistently higher than that of environment or genotype by environment interactions for most of the important quality traits. In a study of black bean populations, it was reported that selection for superiority in canning traits is unlikely to cause yield drag [16]. This is very important because yield is a key trait to both farmers and processors. To advance research and commercialization of canned bean, several protocols including Michigan State University (MSU) laboratory protocol based on home canning, industry method and near-infrared spectroscopy [12,17] have been developed. Canning quality traits in dry beans are affected by the calcium level in the soak water, blanch water and brine, as well as the soaking and blanching time used during evaluation [18]. The MSU home canning-based protocol, that adjusts for these variations, and industrybased protocol used at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Canada (AAFC-LRDC) were used to determine the canning quality of popular climbing and bush beans in east and central Africa as a background study to initiate selection and breeding for these traits.One hundred and thirty-four (134) genotypes, consisting of land races (6%), varieties released in some of the member countries (Burundi, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Rwanda, Uganda, and Tanzania) of the Pan Africa Bean Research Alliance; PABRA (https://www.pabra-africa.org) (66%), and breeding lines (28%) commonly used for varietal improvement were evaluated for canning traits (Table 1). Most (88%) of the evaluated materials were of bush growth habit and of medium (45%) and small seed size (40%). Red mottled, reds, speckled and whites were the most common seed colors in the evaluated panel (Table 1).Experiments were set at the Alliance for Bioversity and International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) station in Uganda that is based at the National Agricultural Research Laboratories (NARL), Kawanda. The NARL is in Nabweru sub-county, Wakiso District about 13Km from Kampala city. It is located longitude 45˚N and latitude 48˚E and is 1190 m above sea level with an average temperature of 22°C and 1242 mm annual rainfall. Three trials that included i) second rain season (July-September) of 2015, ii) second rainy season (July-September) of 2016 and iii) off season (November 2017-February 2018) were used in this study. The trials were planted in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with two replications. Plot size was 3 x 3 m. At harvest, seeds were sun dried to recommended moisture content (10-15%) and hand sorted to remove foreign matters, physically damaged beans and undesirable types.For canning assessments, the seeds harvested from the 2015 trial were sub divided into three: one set of 250 g of seeds per germplasm were shipped to USDA-ARS; Sugarbeet and Bean Research Unit, East Lansing, Michigan, another set was assessed at CIAT-Kawanda, and the third set was field evaluated at Kawanda during the July-September rain season of 2016. The harvested seeds were subdivided into two: one set was tested for canning quality at CIAT-Kawanda and the other set including an additional 14 lines to make it 134 lines were replanted in the 2017 off season (November 2017-Februray 2018) and the harvested seed (500 g) sent to LRDC-Canada in April, 2018 and tested for canning and cooking quality. In summary, four sets of canning data: one from the Sugarbeet and Bean Research Unit at MSU (2015), two from Kawanda-Uganda (2015 and 2016) and one from Canada (2017) were generated.The MSU bean canning laboratory protocol was based on a home canning method developed by Uebersax and Hosfield [19] and later designed to fit the United States and Canada canning industry standards [17]. The procedures involved cold and hot soaking of bean samples, brine preparation, autoclaving, storage and evaluation for consumer traits. Harvested seeds were sorted to remove any foreign matters, physically damaged beans and undesirable types. Sub-sampling was done for each sample to obtain 2 or 3 samples per experimental unit and samples labelled uniquely. For the first two analysis, only one sample per genotype was canned in each of the laboratories due to limited seed quantities, and thus laboratories were considered as duplicates. The moisture content of each sample was recorded using a DICKEY-John GAC 2500GMA and a SINAR Model 6095 AgriPro Moisture Analyzer at Michigan and Kawanda, respectively. For each sample an equivalent of 90 g of solid was collected. This is the fresh weight of beans equivalent to 90 g of total solids at a given moisture content that is estimated using the moisture content (%MC) of each sample, for example, 107.1 g of bean fresh weight at 16% MC is equivalent to 90 g solids, that is, Dry bean weight (weight for canning) in grams = 90 g (solids required)1 − ( MC% 100 ) (solids at a given moisture content)The dry beans were processed using a standard soak procedure. Seed samples were placed in heat resistant nylon mesh bags and designated into soak lots. Two soaks were performed: cold and hot soak. The soak solution comprised of 0.28 g of calcium chloride (CaCl2) dissolved in 1 liter of distilled H2O. Calcium ion influences the quality of processed beans and thus the MSU protocol recommends using 75-100 ppm of calcium ions. For cold soaking, CaCl2 solution was prepared by weighing 2.8 g of CaCl2 and dissolving it in 10 liters of distilled water in a plastic bucket. The mixture was stirred to obtain a clear solution before bean samples packed in heat resistant nylon mesh bags were immersed. White beans were soaked separately from colored or black beans. Seed color and type is known to influence cold soaking duration [17]. Therefore, navy (white), great northern, pink and small red beans were soaked for 30 min while red kidney, red mottled, cranberry, and pinto beans were soaked overnight (12-14 hrs) in large plastic buckets and at room temperature (25°C). Thereafter, hot soaking was done by transferring samples from cold storage into preheated CaCl2 solution; prepared similarly to the one for the cold soak, into a boiler. The bean samples were submerged in the solution for 30 min for all market classes. Thereafter, the samples in mesh bags were removed from the boiler and placed in a large container of cold tap water for 3-5 min and afterwards removed and spread out on flat perforated surface to facilitate uniform drainage for 10-15 min. The soaked seeds were then transferred into labelled, uniformly sized, heat resistant glass jars whose weights were determined by randomly weighing 5 empty jars and obtaining an average. The filled jars were then weighed and the glass jars were filled with hot brine that was prepared by mixing 2.8 g of CaCl2, 150 g of sucrose (sugar) and 10 liters of distilled water in a plastic bucket (that is for 1 liter of H2O use 0.28 g of CaCl2 and 15 g of sugar). The mixture was stirred and then boiled in a steel saucepan on a gas cooker until a temperature of 87°C was attained after which the brine was transferred into glass jars (fully filled leaving 2.5 cm headspace) containing beans using a measuring cup. To prevent glass jars from breaking, they were placed in hot water during the brine filling process. The jars were then sealed and autoclaved at 120°C for 30 min (F0 = 23.3 min) after which they were removed and transferred into cardboard boxes and stored at room (ambient) temperatures for a minimum of two weeks at MSU and four weeks at CIAT-Kawanda. The four weeks considered at Kawanda initially intended to capture the shelf life on the Ugandan market.Dry bean seed samples were processed at AAFC-LRDC using industry protocols. Seeds were stored in closed containers for about 1 week to equilibrate the samples for moisture. Three high quality canning checks were included: AAC Cranford (cranberry), AAC Expedition (pinto) and AC Black Diamond (shiny black). The percent moisture content (%MC) of the bean samples was determined using a Dickey-john 2500-UGMA Grain Analyzer.Based on the %MC, 90 g of dry bean seeds were weighed into a 1.2 L stainless steel beaker and soaked in 1 L deionized water at ambient temperature (21°C) for 16 hours, drained, weighed, then hydration coefficient was calculated. The beans were then blanched by placing the beakers onto a closable steam table and adding about 1 L of boiling water that was maintained at 93°C using a digital thermometer equipped with a thermocouple for 3 min. Cooling to about 50°C for about 30 min was performed by spraying with ambient water. The beans were then drained for two min, weighed to determine the hydration coefficient after blanching and then placed in 14 fluid oz (398 ml) cans. This was followed by different treatments for navy (white) and colored beans. Heated tomato sauce that consisted of 10% (w/v) tomato puree, 9% (w/v) sugar, 2% (w/v) salt, 2% (w/v) Colflo67 starch in 1 L of deionized water, was added to each can of navy beans allowing a headspace of about 10 mm. For colored beans, brine solution, which was a heated mixture of 1% salt (w/v) and water was used instead of tomato sauce. The cans were then sealed under atmosphere steam with a can sealer and processed at 121°C for 40 min for navy or 20 mins for colored beans at 4 rev min -¹ using a 2402 Multimode R&D Retort (Allpax Products, LLC, Covington, LA, USA). Cooling in cold running water for 20 min at 4 rev min -¹ was performed and the cans were then stored in a dry ambient store for at least 2 weeks before assessing the processing quality.Data were collected on percentage-soaked weight, hydration coefficient and then visual assessments were made on the canned beans. The percentage-soaked bean weight (SBW, g) which is the weight of a bean sample after soaking in cold and then hot was recorded. This weight is the measure of both the weight of water and weight of total solids in the sample. For visual assessments, the brine and seeds were poured in separate plates and assessed for color, appearance, brine clarity, bean splitting and free starch/clumps using 1 to 5 rating scale (Table 2). A single score for overall appearance was recorded considering all the above-mentioned quality traits [17,20]. This method made it easier to handle many samples. However, for the 2016 harvest, a 1-7 scale was used to rate each quality trait separately where: 1 = Unacceptable, 2 = Very bad, 3 = Bad, 4 = Fair, 5 = Good, 6 = Very good and 7 = Excellent. The 1-7 scale was used as it was found to be more informative since this trial was for confirmation [17]. Nonetheless, a 1-5 is recommended because there are less categories for raters to decide on, and they are more likely to use the full scale.Five to fourteen people visually rated the canned beans at both MSU and Kawanda, respectively and the averages were obtained for analysis. The visual quality assessment, which is also referred to as the processing quality index (PQI) is assessed subjectively by a trained panel of judges, typically on a 7-point hedonic scale. Using the PQI, six variables are considered and each is weighted for importance: (1) overall appearance, (2) splits, (3) clumps, (4) cooking broth viscosity, ( 5) cooking broth extruded starch and (6) seed shape, color and size [21].Data were collected on hydration coefficient after soaking (HCS), hydration coefficient after blanching (HCB), drain weight (%), matting (clumping), appearance, seed color, seed texture and the cooking quality. For HCS, a predetermined seed weight (that is, seed solids) based on the bean market class was soaked for 16 hrs in deionized water at room (21°C) temperature. The HCS was determined as:!\"#$%& () *(+,\"-.\"+/* ($)4\"#$%& () -3; *\"\"-($) . For HCB, soaked seeds were blanched for 3 min at 93°C and HCB was determined as:.To measure drained weight (%), colored bean seeds were processed at 121°C at 4 rpm for 20 min in brine while Navy bean seeds were processed at 121°C at 4 rpm for 40 min in tomato sauce. The can content was weighed and the drained weight of bean seed was determined after washing in tap water on an 8-mesh screen (Tyler series) positioned at a 15° angle. Percentage drain weight was determined as: Drain weight of 60% or higher was acceptable as indicated that 60% of the can content was bean seed. Matting (clumping) and appearance of seeds were assessed on a 1 to 4 scale, where 1 = none, 2 = trace, 3 = slight, 4 = moderate for matting, and 1 = excellent, 2 = good, 3 = acceptable, 4 = poor for appearance.The L* (light-dark), a* (red-green) and b* (yellow-blue) attributes of color were measured on dry and processed (canned) seed using a CR-410 Chroma meter (Konica Minolta Sensing Americas, Inc., Ramsey, NJ, USA). One hundred grams of processed bean seed were used to determine color after canning. Texture (firmness), measured in kg force 100 g seed -1 was determined by placing 100 g of washed drained bean into a standard shear compression cell (CS-1) of Texture Measurement System-Touch (TMS-Touch, Food Technology Corp., Sterling, VA, USA) and shearing them using a load cell of 255 kg force at a rate of 0.83 cm sec -1 . Comparison was then made with the check varieties.Cooking quality assessment was conducted to determine hard seeds and partially hydrated seeds. Two hundred seeds per sample were weighed and soaked in stainless steel beakers using deionized water for 16 hrs at room temperature (21°C), drained and reweighed. Deionized water was heated in a blancher (steam cauldron) to 95°C prior to cooking the seed samples in the beakers for 20 min at 95°C. The seeds were allowed to cool to about 50°C and drained. The weight of seeds after cooking was recorded per sample. The hydration coefficients before ( !\"#$%& () *(+,\"-.\"+/* ($)4\"#$%& () -3; *\"\"-($) ), and after cooking ( !\"#$%& () <((,\"-.\"+/* ($)4\"#$%& () -3; *\"\"-($) ) were determined. The number of hydrated and partially hydrated seeds before and after cooking were counted to determine percentage hard-seed and percentage partially hydrated seed.Data collected by MSU and CIAT Uganda were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) in Genstat software, release 19.1 [22] using ANOVA, REML or regression statistics model. The design was orthogonal for all variables; hence, the output was generated by ANOVA model. Correlations between variables were analyzed in the same software using mean data. Broad sense heritability (H 2 , repeatability) was calculated on entry mean basis as:where, VC = variance component, G = genotype, e = error and r = number of replications. In the case of LDRC, the data were subjected to Proc Mixed of SAS (version 9.3) for modified augmented design. Least significant difference (LSD (0.05)) was derived by Dunnett's Test in Proc Mixed to compare an entry mean with a check cultivar.In addition to other traits, the processing quality index (PQI), texture and washed drained weight of canned bean were captured to identify differences among the evaluated genotypes. The above-mentioned three variables have been shown to be most useful for selecting superior genotypes for canning quality [23] and were thus emphasized in this study.There were significant differences (P≤0.05) for most traits: hydration coefficient, moisture content, 100 seed weight and visual quality traits after canning among the genotypes (Table 3). Repetition effects were significant (P≤0.01) for all variables for the 2015 harvest evaluated at the two laboratories: CIAT and MSU. The confirmation trial (2016 harvest at Kawanda only) showed that replication effect was only significant in two attributes of visual quality (splitting and clumping).Replications were made to obtain reliable data. The same seed lot was used in the first two evaluations that were conducted in two laboratories and a different seed lot was evaluated as a confirmatory trial in one of the laboratories. The repetition effect was significantly different in all variables, possibly because the seeds were stored for about a year prior to the second evaluation, and visual quality rating was also carried after different storage periods: 14 and 30 days. Repetition effect in the confirmatory trial was only significant in two visual quality traits: splitting and clumping implying that there was less variation due to external factors in the data. Uniformity in canning procedure and consistent quality determined by visual rating was suggested as a necessity for a variety to be commercially successful because bean genuineness is assessed [24]. Although genotypes only significantly (P ≤ 0.001) differed in moisture content, weight of 100 seeds, hydration coefficient in the first two evaluations, significant differences (P ≤ 0.001) were observed in all traits except in moisture content in the third evaluation. The repeatability (broad sense heritability) for hydration coefficient and visual quality assessment for each attribute (and the averaged value) were generally high (> 0.6) except in color (Table 3). This indicated high potential to reliably select for genetic variation. This variation is vital for genetic gain during crop improvement because it creates a wide genetic base that is important for selection [25].There were significant differences (P≤0.05) among the laboratories and among lines for HC (Table 3). The high mean values (1.9 to 2.1) for this trait indicated that majority of the genotypes had a relatively high HC. The values varied between 1.6 and 2.3 at Kawanda (2015 and 2016), 1.0 and 2.2 at MSU (Annex 1). A value of 1.8 is acceptable by the canning industry because soaking uncooked beans normally causes a mass increase of 80% [18,23]. A high HC is preferred because such beans produce greater can quantity. A moderate positive correlation that existed between hydration coefficient (HC) [r = 0.53***] and 100 seed weight (Table 4) showed that larger beans absorbed proportionally more water during soaking. Out of 67 large (SW100 ≥ 35.0 g) and 54 small (SW100 < 35.0 g) seeded genotypes, 75% and 37%, respectively, had consistent HC of ≥2 (Data not shown). A high HC reduces cooking time and causes a quicker germination when seeds are planted, making it very desirable in the industry [8]. In general, of the 121 genotypes, 87 lines (72%) had HC greater than 1.8 in all the three evaluations, which indicated a high potential of finding industry acceptable genotypes based on further characterisation. Consistent superiority (HC >2.1) in this trait was observed in 27% of the lines; the exceptional ones were in VTTT923/10-3, GASIRIDA, NABE18, NABE19, K132 (CAL96), CODMLB001 and NABE26C, NUA8, KK8 and MAC44 (Annex 1).Considering data from LRDC-Canada, all large seeded varieties except for NUA45, had HCS and HCB above 1.8 indicating potential for canning (Annex 2). The varieties NABE29C and VTTT923/10-3 had HCS of 2.2 higher than the largeseeded check AAC Cranford (2.1) and equal to AAC Expedition (2.2). Four large seeded varieties: NABE11, VTTT923/10-3, NABE20 and KK8 had HCB of 2.4 greater than all the checks. Nine medium seeded varieties had HCS less than 1.8 while only one NUA689 had HCB less than 1.8. Fourteen small seeded varieties had HCS less than 1.8 while only two, VAX4 and TU had HCB less than 1.8 (Annex 2).Appearance of seeds was assessed on a 1 to 4 scale at AAFC-LRDC, Canada where, 1 = excellent, 2 = good, 3 = acceptable, 4 = poor) compared to 1-5 and 1-7 scales that were used in Kawanda and MSU.Based on canning tests conducted on the 2015 trial at Kawanda and MSU, the mean scores ranged from 2.5 to 5.1 and 15.7% of the lines scored above the mean. Out of the 87 lines, which were consistently superior in HC, 33 lines (37.9%) had average to excellent visual quality (Figures 1 and 2). In the 2016 trial, 13% of the lines were rated very good to excellent, 36% were rated good to very good (Figure 3). Although not very strong, HC positively correlated to visual canning score [r = 0.26***] (Table 4), which showed that genotypes with high values of HC tended to have good visual quality respectively. The following four large and one small seeded genotypes: MAC44, SAB659, NABE12C, NABE21 and VAX5, respectively, combined high (≥2) HC with superior visual canning quality across the two seasons at the two laboratories (2015 MSU and Kawanda, and 2016 Kawanda) (Annex 1). These were rated 4/5 and 6/7 on a 5-and 7-point scale, respectively, signifying very good to excellent canning quality basing on appearance, brine clarity, bean splitting and absence of starch/clumps in 2015 and 2016. About 9.9% of genotypes had higher scores than the check genotypes, MEXICO142, Awash1 and Awash Melka whose visual scores were 2.0/3.1, 1.0/3.8 and 2.0/3.3, respectively, in the first two evaluations. All these checks are white beans and only one genotype of the same seed type, Michelite (3.0/3.6), exhibited a slightly better quality. Among the 134 lines evaluated in Canada, 18 were large seeded with the majority being of red mottled grain market class, 60 were medium seeded with the majority being of red mottled grain market class and 53 were small seeded with a number of them being white, black or red in color. Results showed that all the large seed varieties with the exception of G16157 had excellent to good appearance after canning (Figure 4) and were more superior to the checks. There was trace to no matting among these varieties. All the medium seeded varieties had excellent to good appearance after canning except GLP2 (Figure 4). Most of the small seeded varieties had good to acceptable appearance after canning, however, Maharage Soja had a poor appearance (Annex 2). Several genotypes were more superior to the above-mentioned check genotypes across the three laboratories (Table 5). The superior lines belong to several market classes and could have wide acceptability if promoted for canning. An old genotype MEXICO142 highly utilised in the canning industry in Kenya in the past years [10] was on average rated between fair and good. Though not white seeded like MEXICO 142, the genotypes MAC44 (red mottled climber), NABE12C/ SUG35 (cream seeded climber), BIHOGO (yellow seeded bush bean), VAX5 (small cream seeded bush bean), KK8 (red mottled bush) and NABE29C (small red seeded climber) were consistently very good/ excellent in visual quality. This showed the potential that exists in other non-white market classes, but also recognised a need for breeding for more white beans that are not only good for canning but also resilient in farmer fields. The genotypes Awash1 and Awash Melka that were also on average rated fair/ good in visual quality were among genotypes with the highest canning quality in a study carried out in Ethiopia [8]. They were evaluated together with other three white bean genotypes: Argene, Omer and Chercher and it was concluded that they together with Argene were suitable for canning. This study had a larger set of lines and MAC44, NABE12C/SUG35, BIHOGO, KK8, SAB659 and NABE21 were consistently superior. However, none of these are white and thus cannot feed in the current market segment. Two white beans: Michelite and CAB2 exhibited a relatively similar canning quality to these check lines. Small seeded white beans that are significantly better than the current ones demanded by the market were absent and thus breeding efforts need to be directed to this area.Studies have been done on several market types: black beans [16]; kidney beans [26,27] and white beans [11,8,9,10,28,29] which seem to remain the most popular in canning industry. In addition to white beans, other major market classes including red mottled, small reds, yellows and sugar beans are widely consumed in east and central Africa [30]. Beans belonging to these market classes like Masindi yellow short, Masindi yellow long, VAX2, MEXICO142, MAC44, KK8, SAB659, NABE29C, NABE8C, NABE21, et cetera, that retained their colors during canning process, and were superior in all or most of the other traits have untapped potential in this region if promoted, improved or used as parental genotypes for breeding. In addition, the superior lines are of both bush and climbing bean types indicating a broader potential for adoption by farmers if promoted. Growth habit and seed type are some of the key traits that have potential effect on connecting farmers/ seed producers to the market. These need to be considered early in the breeding pipelines to produce lines relevant to the market. Overall, this study showed the presence of genotypes possessing good canning quality in the germplasm popular in east and central Africa.A drained weight of ≥60% is acceptable and it indicates that ≥60% of the can content was bean seeds [18]. All large, seeded genotypes except for G16157 and NUA45 were acceptable although none outperformed the checks. Similarly, all small seeded genotypes except for Roba1, Maharage soja and NABE6 and all medium sized varieties except for GLP2, NUA689 and KATB9 were acceptable (Annex 2). There was no association [r = -0.03, ns] between washed drained weight (WDW) and weight of 100 dry bean seeds (SW100) (Table 4). As noted above, large, medium and small seeded genotypes performed similarly well in this trait. Test varieties were compared against industry checks and in summary the varieties NGWINXCAB2, NABE21, CODMLB001, NABE12C, Michelite, Awash1 and SELIAN97 (red kidney) exhibited excellent canning qualities with respect to HC, drained weight, matting and appearance from tests conducted at LDRC (Annex 2).Variability in texture ranged from 19.3 in CNF5520 to 114.7 in NUA689 with a mean of 49.9 kg force per 100 g processed seed (Annex 2), which indicated that majority of the genotypes were soft. The optimum canning requirement of firmness/texture is 55-65 kg force per 100 g processed seed based on processors and consumer preferences [31] and 91% of the genotypes met this requirement. However, beans should soften during processing, but not to disintegrate the bean contents [31]. Other studies report texture ranges of 38.5 to 48.7 for navy bean and 59.1 and 89.9 for small white [31,32] which are comparable to the values obtained in this study. Compared to the check genotypes, only CNF5520 was lower than AAC Cranford and AAC Expedition, and 14 other genotypes were lower than AC Black Diamond. The genotype CNF5520 was significantly (P≤0.05) different from AAC Cranford while NABE9C and MEXICO 54 did not significantly differ (P≤0.05) from AAC Cranford and AAC Expedition respectively (Annex 2). Texture is thought to be influenced by seed coat thickness among other traits, thus beans with thin seed coats like the navy type tend to have low texture to withstand the canning process [32]. For this reason, the type is canned in tomato sauce for acceptable texture and appearance [33] and a higher texture value of 72 kg force per 100 g processed seed is the industry standard for navy bean [31]. Texture was significant (P≤0.001) and negatively associated [r = -0.26 to -0.46] with all the different hydration coefficients (Table 4), which showed that beans with poor soaking ability required more force to penetrate. In addition, the higher the texture, the lower the SW100, appearance and matting but only the latter had a significant [r = -0.23**] association (Table 4). This indicated that beans with low texture (firmness) tended to clump easily.Color is an attribute of beans that influences the market based on consumer preference [30]. The color of dry and cooked beans is measured visually or by a chromameter using L * , a * , b * values. The L* indicates \"light-dark\" with higher values for lightness; a* indicates \"red-green\" with positive values for redness and negative values for greenness; and b* indicates \"yellow-blue\" with positive values for yellowness and negative values for blueness [34]. Based on the importance of color to the market, a positive correlation between the dry and the cooked bean is important. In this study, the positive and strong significant (≤0.001) correlations existed in the L*, a*, b* values of dry and canned beans (Table 4), which showed that majority of the genotypes retained their color during the canning process.However, compared among the three categories, beans with high positive b* values (yellowness) tended to lose more color during canning since its correlation [r = 0.63] was lower than the 0.89 and 0.80 obtained for L* and a* (Annex 2). Overall, the following 14 genotypes: RANJONOMBY, CAB2, RWV3006, G90, SAB712, CNF5520, VCB81013, Awash Melka, RWV3316, KATSW-12, KATSW-9, KATSW-10, UBR (92)25 and Awash1 were superior to all the three checks, AAC Expedition, AAC Cranford and AC Black Diamond in maintaining high L* and b* values in both dry and cooked beans (Annex 2). These could be used as parental lines for improvement of this trait but most genotypes including those previously identified visually retained color during canning.Thirty-seven genotypes (29%) were superior to the industrial checks in regard to having no or negligible proportions of hard seed after a 16 hr soak at 21°C and partially hydrated seed after a 16hr soak at 21°C (Table 6). Thirty-two lines (24%) had HC less than 1.8 after a 16hr soak at 21°C but all 130 lines had HC >2 after 20 min cooking time at 95°C. Only three lines: NUA689, RWV3006 and RWV3316 had >1% hard seed after cooking for 20 min at 95°C. Eleven lines remained partially hydrated after 20 min of cooking at 95°C. Eleven lines including BAT332, VAX5, UBR(95)25, KATSW9, KATSW10, KATSW12, NABE6, Kanyebwa, ECAPAN01, NABE29C and Masindi Yellow had good cooking qualities (Table 6).There was diversity among genotypes used in this study which can be further exploited to improve canning quality traits of common beans. There were no identified small white bean genotypes superior to the three small white beans popular in the canning industry in this region suggesting that more breeding effort is needed for this market segment. Nonetheless, the several identified genotypes could be promoted for canning purposes to capture the diverse market preferences in color that exist in Africa. Many of these genotypes are already with the farmers and their adoption by the processors could open a new market for the farmers, thereby increasing their income. Considering the three key traits for measuring canning quality [23], texture was weakly, non-significantly and negatively correlated to appearance. Similarly, appearance expressed weak negative nonsignificant correlation with washed drained weight. These indicated that beans with high firmness tended to exhibit better appearance and that better appearance was associated with high drained weight. While both were expected favorable associations, they were non-significant showing the need to phenotype for all the traits during evaluation. , large seeded); AAC Expedition (Secondary check, 5 replicates, medium seeded); and AC Black Diamond (Secondary check, 5 replicates, small seeded). HCS = hydration coefficient after soaking, HCB = hydration coefficient after blanching, SW100 (g) = weight of 100 dry bean seeds, LSD = least significant difference","tokenCount":"5850"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1808141968.json b/data/part_2/1808141968.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e917a9276ca8130fd7c8f64696c43c082f025684 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1808141968.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a1e143584ac4e10755c47ac0a0762713","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/db6336ce-c832-4dde-959d-87cb396294d8/retrieve","id":"727562106"},"keywords":["SDG1 No poverty","SDG2. Zero Hunger","SDG5. Gender Equity","SDG14. Life Below Water and SDG15. Life on Land"],"sieverID":"af38543e-a385-4d77-8572-14518fc9b5c4","pagecount":"35","content":"International Potato Center (CIP) and WorldFish. NPS initiative aims to improve the lives of millions of people by identifying ways of building stronger policies and strategies with greater coherence and capacity, helping countries address current policy demand and future development needs. Ben Mwongela is an independent consultant who worked with Agatha Thuo and Winnie Muya from the Agriculture Sector Network (ASNET), and Joseph Karugia from ILRI. We want to thank all key informants who participated in this study and multi-stakeholders who participated in the report sharing and validation of the workshop in Nairobi, Kenya. We are grateful for the support of CGIAR Trust Fund contributors: www.cgiar.org/funders.Over the years, food markets have faced numerous challenges associated with the distribution of agricultural inputs and products. The retail price one pays for vegetables, animal products, cereals, fruits, and other items is influenced by a composite of factors such as input costs, transportation costs, cess tax, and market levies, all of which collectively contribute to over 50% of the total cost of a meal. However, despite their significance to revenue collection, these levies have been employed to the detriment of producers, traders, processors, and consumers, exacerbating the already high cost of living and hindering economic growth. The situation demands urgent policy reforms to address these issues and stimulate economic growth.Agricultural Produce Cess (APC) is a tax county governments impose on tradable commodities crossing county borders to raise revenue. Similarly, market cess or landing fees are imposed on agricultural inputs and commodities to raise revenue for destination counties where crops are landed, processed, or sold. Agricultural inputs and branded vehicles face additional charges when moving between counties, resulting in multiple taxation. There is a growing concern over the lack of transparency and accountability in utilizing these levies. The goal of improving physical infrastructure and enhancing farm productivity remains elusive, as little evidence proves that the funds collected are reinvested in the agricultural sector.Before the enactment of the Constitution in 2010, the collection of produce cess in Kenya was governed by the Agriculture Act (Cap. 318) of the country's laws. This Act granted local authorities the power to impose cess in consultation with and with the consent of the Minister in charge of Local Government. The establishment of 47 county governments marked a significant shift in the governance structure, and the Constitution now allows both the national and county governments to impose taxes. However, the legal foundation for cess is not well established. This has prompted various stakeholders to advocate for urgent policy reforms. The ongoing dialogue, coordinated by the Agriculture Sector Network (ASNET), underscores the pressing need to reform the structure and application of cess and market levy systems to ensure fair and equitable taxation that promotes sustainable agricultural development and benefits all stakeholders involved.Experiences from cess systems in other jurisdictions, such as India, Australia, and the United Kingdom, demonstrate the direct benefits of levies to both the payers and the broader community. These countries have adopted taxation policies that favour agricultural stakeholders by implementing minimum turnover thresholds before taxation, capping tax rates and providing specific exemptions to cushion producers from over taxation. Thus, Kenya could draw valuable insights from these practices to reform cess collection and usage.By fostering transparency, accountability, and evidence-based decision-making in the cess and market levy policies, the Government of Kenya can create an enabling environment that facilitates agricultural productivity, stimulates investment, and ensures food security for its citizens. These reforms promise a more efficient and equitable agricultural sector, instilling hope and optimism among all stakeholders.1. IntroductionThe Agriculture Produce Cess (APC), also known as cess fees, is tax county governments impose on tradable commodities crossing county borders to raise revenue for the origin counties. The cess is applied to commercially produced or supplied agricultural inputs and products like cereals, livestock, vegetables, fish, fruits, coffee, tea, and flowers. It is levied based on the product's weight, packaging (e.g., per sack), or the carrying capacity of the transporting vehicle. Counties typically levy cess on goods produced within their jurisdiction. If agricultural goods' cess is paid in one county, some waive additional charges for goods passing through. However, evidence of cess payment in the county of origin is required.Similarly, market cess, or landing fees, is imposed on agricultural inputs and commodities to raise revenue for destination counties where crops and livestock are landed, processed, or sold. Apart from these, agricultural inputs and branded vehicles face additional cess charges when moving between counties regardless of levies charged at the county of origin. Other undeclared charges, like parking, branding, and advertisement costs, are also imposed, contributing to multiple taxation, thus adding to the financial burden during transit. These levies vary across counties.In partnership with its members, the Agriculture Sector Network (ASNET) has been working to review levies to establish what the membership has done on the subject. The review aims to provide a working document that would form a basis for advocacy by the ASNET membership on agricultural produce cess and other market-associated levies as they engage the county and national governments.With support from the CGIAR Initiative on National Policies and Strategies and in collaboration with the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), various private-sector agriculture stakeholders, under the coordination of ASNET, initiated efforts to conduct a deep dive into APC and other market levies. ASNET also launched an advocacy process.The Agriculture Sector Network (ASNET) is the umbrella body of Kenya's agricultural sector. It was formed through a partnership comprising the Kenya Private Sector Alliance (KEPSA), Kenya National Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KNCCI), Kenya Association of Manufacturers (KAM), and the SDG Partnership Platform of the United Nations, with support from the defunct Business Advocacy Fund (BAF), Elgon Kenya Limited, other like-minded business associations, private sector partners and other stakeholders. ASNET plays a crucial role in advocating for policy reforms and coordinating dialogue among various stakeholders in the agricultural sector. It was launched in February 2020 at a Safari Park Declaration.ASNET's key role is coordinating agriculture sector actors in Kenya through various mechanisms to engage in policy advocacy and value chain development that promote increased productivity and competitiveness and attract investments into the agriculture sector. The network endeavors to be the lead entity in advocacy for a competitive and enabling business environment for the agriculture sector at the county, national, regional, continental, and global levels. This is envisaged through solid partnerships with the national and county governments, development partners, and other stakeholders to revolutionize the agricultural sector, leading to growth, inclusive wealth, and ultimately creating jobs. The agricultural sector is the backbone of Kenya's economy, contributing approximately 21.17% (KNBS Economic Survey, 2023) of the country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2022. The sector employs more than 40% of the total population and 70% of the rural population, accounting for more than 50% of the country's export earnings. 1Over the years, food markets have faced numerous challenges. To understand the cost of preparing a meal in Kenya, it is essential to grasp the cost framework associated with the distribution of agricultural products. Retail prices pay for vegetables, cereals, fruits, and other items and are influenced by various costs related to the distribution of agricultural products. These include transportation costs from the farm to the market, cess tax, brokers' fees, and market levies, all of which collectively contribute to over 50% of the total cost of a meal. Source: https://medium.com/@shipsenga/the-cost-of-putting-food-on-the-table-the-taxing-nature-of-cess-fees-in-kenya-93bbefcbc0e6It is essential to understand that the Kenyan economy is tax-based, hence the need for the government to raise revenue for economic development. Cess is a levy on tradable agricultural produce imposed previously by local authorities (LAs) based on the Agriculture Act (Cap 318) and the Local Government Act (Cap 265). The implementation of cess before devolution was supported by its incorporation into agricultural sector policies and legislation. Local authorities could impose cess on tradable agricultural produce in consultation with the Minister. LA bylaws require any person within or outside an area to pay or deduct from the amount payable to the seller an equal amount of the required cess and remit it to the respective LA. Cess was intended as an earmarked levy to support the improvement of production and distribution of taxed agricultural produce. Eighty percent (80%) of the cess collection was used in maintaining roads and other services related to sectors in which it was levied.The remaining 20% was credited to the general accounts of LAs 3 .The Agriculture Produce Cess (APC) is a tax levied on tradable commodities by county governments to raise revenue for the origin counties where the crops are grown. Cess is applied to agricultural and fishing products that are commercially produced or supplied, such as maize, milk, cattle, vegetables, fish, fruits, coffee, tea, and flowers.The unit used to levy the cess is based on the product's weight, the package or container (e.g., per sack of the product), or the carrying capacity of the motor vehicle used for transportation. Cess is collected either at the source of the products or during transportation on designated county or national government roads. Typically, counties levy cess fees on products or goods produced or extracted within their jurisdiction. The funds are expected to be used to improve physical infrastructure such as roads and other assets that contribute to the enhancement of agricultural production services and facilitate marketing and distribution of these commodities.Market cess (landing fees) are fees imposed by county governments on agricultural commodities with the similar intention of raising revenue for the destination counties where the crops are landed, processed, or sold. Inputs such as seed are also subjected to cess charges, where the movement of seed from one county to another is subject to this taxation. This is coupled with fees charged on branded vehicles. These funds have been assumed to bear the same functionality as APC.Unfortunately, in both cases, these charges are not necessarily ploughed back to the sector in proportion to the amounts collected to meet the county government's intended purposes.In addition, cess accounts for a relatively small proportion of county governments' own-source revenue. In the financial year (FY) 2016/17, collections by counties amounted to KSh 1.2 billion, equivalent to 3.5% of aggregate Own Source Revenue (OSR).In FY 2015/16, KSh 1.3 billion was collected, which equaled 3.6% of total OSR. This excludes KSh 106.8 million in coffee cess collected by the Kenya Roads Board (KRB), which was subsequently released to 30 counties from which it was generated. 4 Low cess collections may indicate leakages or poor compliance, especially given the levy's weak connection with specific services. They may also signify negative yields resulting from high administration costs.While the Constitution provides a clear taxation framework, there have been contentious areas. One such area is the collection of agricultural produce cess. The repeal of the Agriculture Act (Cap. 318) in January 2013 through the enactment of the Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Authority (AFFA) Act (No. 13 of 2013) 5 added to the complexity. During the transitional period until September 2013, counties continued to impose cess under the Public Finance Management Act of 2012. Subsequently, most counties incorporated cess charges into their legal systems through statutes passed by their respective county assemblies.The legal foundation for cess is not well-established. While the Constitution provides guidelines on taxation powers for both national and county governments, there have been contentious areas and a lack of precise alignment regarding cess. The absence of harmonized legislation has led to high and multiple charges, plus numerous collection points, thus increasing costs for producers and traders, eventually hurting the agricultural sector's competitiveness. Different counties' use of different units of measurement for levying fees, such as tonnage, package size, vehicle type, and number of trips, has created trade barriers within the country.In the current Kenyan context, the county financial bills, where the agricultural cess and market levies are domiciled, have been used as the safest way for introducing new charges as opposed to addressing the agricultural issues through structured and harmonized laws and legal provisions that guarantee the longevity of the application. Each county has the discretion to determine the rate and/or computational formula for the fees based on the prevailing laws and regulations. Usually, the rates charged may be in the form of a numeric value or percentage with no clear justification of the process used to determine the values applied. Whatever the case, the computation of the final amount payable is based on the volume and/or value of the tradable commodity.There is a lack of understanding about the actual cost of revenue administration at the county level, hindering the development of efficient collection strategies. This deficiency, coupled with revenue losses during cess and other levy collections, underscores the need for a more streamlined and comprehensive approach to revenue administration within counties. Addressing these issues is crucial for fostering economic growth and reducing the burden on stakeholders in the agriculture sector.While appreciating the importance of the devolved system of governance that requires counties to have internal revenueraising abilities to bring services closer to citizens, the persistent concern about these fees is that they are unnecessarily high and change without due notice, thus making doing business unpredictable. The determination and calculation of cess charges lack clear policies and legislation. The formula for setting cess remains unknown, and rates vary significantly across counties and agricultural commodities.Another challenge is undeclared charges such as parking fees, branding charges, and advertisement costs, among others, which various industry stakeholders have considered as multiple taxation, where the same product is charged more than once by different jurisdictions while on transit across from the counties of origin to its destination. For example, branded seed companies' vehicles pay KSh 20,000-50,000, depending on capacity. This increases distribution costs by 0.8% and production costs by 0.2% for every 1% increase in cess, thus reducing seed affordability 6 . In addition, landing fees/market cess are charged on commodities depending on the destination market. This increases marketing costs, thus raising consumer prices and reducing food affordability.These levies, despite their significance to revenue collection, have been employed to the detriment of producers, traders, processors, and consumers. They continue to proliferate as each county has the discretion to determine the rates and formulas for these fees, often lacking clear justification for their determination, as per the provisions of county finance bills.Even though commodity traders mostly pay cess, the burden is still passed on to farmers as traders discount the cess charges on the final farm gate price. This practice reduces producer incomes and threatens the sustainability of agricultural production in Kenya.It is unfortunate that the erection of barriers on roads (including along key transport corridors and highways), disguised as points of cess collection, has become a common phenomenon all over the country. Cess fees for products moving between counties and not recognizing permits issued by other counties lead to double taxation and inflated transportation costs, resulting in higher product prices. The 'barrier' method of cess administration disrupts the free flow of goods between counties and may also contribute to high administration and overall economic costs. The practice of county stationing revenue clerks on barricades along transportation routes also leads to unnecessary delays.Cess is collected at the source (e.g., at the farm gate in the case of agricultural produce and at the production point in the case of manufactured goods). It is also collected at the end of the exit from the county. However, some counties do not charge additional cess for transporting goods through their territory. Instead, the transporter must provide evidence of having paid cess in the county of origin. Nonetheless, the transporter or trader is still required to pay market fees to access or sell the goods in the destination market, referred to as market levy.Hence, it is clear that cess significantly contributes to increasing the overall cost of doing business and restricts the trade of agricultural products, thus affecting market competitiveness. It may not improve the economy as intended. Cess collection across county borders means that final consumers are likely to suffer higher commodity prices even though producers are the ones liable to make payments.In practice, reinvestment of these levies is meant to improve physical infrastructure, thus facilitating marketing and distribution of agricultural commodities, and enhancing farm productivity. However, there is no evidence that such charges collected through APC and market cess get reinvested in the agricultural sector as intended. These have not only resulted in the denial of market access but have also significantly contributed to increasing the cost of doing business in the country.Reforms have yet to address the numerous and fragmented pieces of legislation, including on many supporting institutions. Authorities estimate that some 130 acts govern the agricultural sector 7 Therefore, it is imperative that sector players and all concerned policy-making organs consider condensing these into fewer than ten without undermining their completeness.The national policy on Agriculture Produce Cess remains unclear, and there is a vacuum in policy guidelines for collecting and utilizing the cess, even at the county level. Thus, reforms in Agriculture Produce Cess, including taxation and levies, will not only help ensure that the movement of farm produce from the farm to markets is freed up by eliminating the time spent and costs incurred but also lift the burden on value chain players, hence contributing to making agriculture more competitive and sustainable.The Agriculture Sector Network initiated an advocacy process on the administration of the Agriculture Produce Cess and other market levies. This concern was brought to the attention of the umbrella body by various Business Member Organizations. The Network has been dedicated to addressing issues surrounding the APC and other market-related levies in Kenya and has held several meetings and events. It has advocated for policy reforms through policy dialogue, consultations, and engagement with relevant government bodies. With support from the CGIAR Initiative on National Policies and Strategies and in collaboration with the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), ASNET conducted a review of existing documentation on APC and other market levies to establish what various members had done on the subject. The review was intended to provide a working document that would form the basis for advocacy by the ASNET membership on this issue, even as they engaged the county and national governments.ASNET then consolidated all the past work on APC and other market levies and made clear recommendations to enhance business competitiveness. Several consultative forums have been held since then.To consolidate the private sector position and build initial consensus on recommendations for advocacy, ASNET organized a workshop on 27-28 July 2023. During this event, the draft position paper was developed based on the findings gathered from the review of previous work done, and engagement with various stakeholders was presented. The paper was reviewed during the event. A road map of activities was developed to ensure inclusivity and stakeholders' buy-in. In addition, a sub-committee was formed to reconvene and create a list of stakeholders who needed to be involved in all future consultations. The team also developed and agreed on a plan whose activities ran from July to November 2023.Participants of the agriculture produce and other market cess review workshop at Naivasha. Photo by: Winnie Muya, ASNETOn 23 August 2023, about a month later, ASNET convened a meeting for the sub-committee appointed during the previous workshop to conduct a stakeholders' analysis. The team developed a list of all the institutions that participated in the initial meeting and identified a long list of additional stakeholders who should be incorporated into the process. The members were then each assigned a list of stakeholders. They were tasked to introduce the subject matter to them and extend an invitation to the next sensitization meeting. A stakeholder matrix was used to prioritize the additional stakeholders. The team was also requested to select some specific value chains with a priority focus on seeds, fertilizer, maize, onions, and cereals. The aim was to quantify the impact of cess using available data.A workshop for private sector players was held on 12 September 2023, with support from the CGIAR Initiative on National Policies and Strategies, through collaboration with ILRI and USAID Feed the Future Kenya Crops and Dairy Market Systems (KCDMS). The half-day event brought together vital agricultural stakeholders from the private sector. Participants were drawn from KAM, KENAFF, CASK, STAK, RETRAK, AKEFEMA, KTGA, USAID, RTI International, AGRA, ASOK, CGA, EATTA, EAGC, NCPK, KFC, KCPK, LNGG, AEA, FPEAK, CKL Africa, Elgon Kenya, United Grain Miller's Association, Argo Processors Association of Kenya, Women Farmers Association of Kenya, Quality & Conformity International, Micro and Small Enterprises Authority, Agriculture Media Society, SUCAM, AAKGrow, Vegpro Group, Kenya National FisherFolk Association (KENAFA), Kenya Livestock Marketing Council, Aquaculture Association of Kenya, Kenya Tourism Federation, Kenya Transporters Association and the Kenya Coffee Platform, among others. Efforts were initiated to conduct a deep dive into the issue of APC and other market levies. The aim of the event was to build consensus on the work that the consultant had done. The Position Paper was also shared and discussed. It was also decided that the next step would involve consultations with public sector officials. The aim was to update participants on the activities that ASNET had implemented and to bring them on board. Sensitization to the challenges surrounding cess and other market levies was conducted, and both the public and private sectors Subcommittee members on stakeholder mapping. Photo by: Winnie Muya -ASNET Agriculture stakeholders workshop on produce and other market cess review. Photo by: Winnie Muya -ASNET Stakeholders at the consultative breakfast meeting. Photo by: Winnie Muya-ASNET agreed that there was a problem with the policy framework on cess. It was decided that legal experts from the government and private sector would hold a meeting to discuss the issues raised. It was also agreed that a workshop be held later to build consensus. The Legal team held a planning meeting on 5 October 2023 where the following issues were addressed: a schedule of key stakeholders to be included and who would participate in the Legal Technical Workshop on APC and other market-related levies, possible dates for the legal experts' retreat and a tentative program of activities. The team also agreed to consolidate and share the legal instruments and policy documents that will be used during the workshop. Earlier, the same group had met at the PETS offices to discuss various legal and policy issues related to produce cess and other market levies.With support from the CGIAR Initiative on National Policies and Strategies through collaboration with the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), ASNET organized a National Dialogue on 20 December 2023. The event's objective was to discuss and address the challenges posed by cess in the agricultural sector. Participants comprised government representatives under the coordination of the State Department of Trade and private sector stakeholders. Delegates discussed the recommendations made in the Position Paper and proposed that cess/fees, if any, should be paid at source and ploughed back into the agricultural sector, and that it should be proportional to the service offered and be justified by the cost of administration and collection of the cess/fees. Other recommendations comprised the following: harmonization and standardization of cess fees and laws; development of a legal document outlining the products subject to cess/fees for presentation to county officers and governments; collaboration with the Council of Governors to garner their support for discussions on cess fee amendments; and advocating for the abolition of market cess.The Legal Technical Workshop, which took place on 11-16 February 2024, was held in collaboration with the Ministry of Investments, Trade and Industry, and the President Economic Transformation Secretariat, with support from AGRA and GAIN. Participants comprised key public and private sector players. They were drawn from the Council of Governors, IGRTC, county governments' trade and agricultural departments, and the private sector. The objective of the meeting was to discuss various legal and policy issues relating to produce cess and other market levies. The team conducted an overview of the existing legal and legislative challenges of agriculture produce cess and other market-related levies and delved into the gaps in the existing policy and legislative framework. They developed a road map of the policy and legislative framework on cess and other marketrelated levies that will be used to guide the process. An Inter-Agency Technical Working Committee (ITWC) was proposed to lead the process of developing a Policy and Bill on the APC and other market-related levies. Among the recommendations made was that the ministry take over the process of transforming the advocacy process on the administration of APC into a legal and regulatory process.This event took place on 22-23 March 2024, with support from the CGIAR Initiative on National Policies and Strategies through collaboration with ILRI. Participants, who were drawn from various sectors of the agricultural industry, convened to meet the Senate Standing Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries, and Blue Economy and the Committee on Delegated Legislation for an intensive two-day workshop aimed at addressing critical issues surrounding APC and associated market levies. It provided an opportunity for members of the committees to engage in constructive dialogue, share insights, and collaborate on potential solutions to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the administration of the agriculture produce cess and market-related levies in the counties. Presentations were made by stakeholders from ASNET, GAIN, AGRA, ILRI, PETS, and the Ministry of Trade.During the workshop, participants highlighted the critical role of agricultural policy reform in fostering sustainable development, improving livelihoods, and addressing cess-related issues to ensure food affordability and accessibility. Members of the Senate Standing Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries, and the Blue Economy highlighted the role of their team in providing legislative oversight and policy guidance to promote sustainable agriculture development. They reaffirmed the committee's commitment to working closely with stakeholders to identify challenges and explore viable solutions.The team underscored the two options-taking the memorandum or the legislative proposal route. The Inter-Agency Technical Committee will draft a Policy on APC, constituted by the Principal Secretary of Trade and Investments in the Ministry of Investments, Trade, and Industry. It is envisaged that a clear policy framework on APC and other market levies administration will not only further improve the business environment but also lower the cost of production and reduce the cost of major food items, hence improving food security in Kenya.Agricultural tax through the imposition of cess is a common practice in several countries. Overall, governments have relied on agriculture as a key sector to provide resources to develop their economies and have been using tax revenues from the sector to support industrial development. Some similarities and differences have been described in different systems of cess practiced across countries. Examples were drawn from Tanzania, Uganda, Burundi, Australia, India, and the United Kingdom (UK). Understanding the design and impact of such taxation regimes is essential for evaluating their impacts.In Tanzania, agricultural levying is implemented through the Local Government Finance Act, which caps the levying rate at 0-5% of the commodity's farm gate price. Cess rates have been varying at 5% from 2007 to 2009, 3% in 2010, and 3-5% in 2011. Local authorities consider cess part of their overall revenue and there is no direct ploughing back of such collections to the agriculture sector. However, a portion of overall revenue is used for the wards and village-level development activities in different sectors. Agricultural produce cess contributes only 2% of the total revenue of all local government authorities in the country and an average of 24% of aggregate own-source revenue 8.In Burundi, inputs for agricultural and livestock activities are taxed at 7%. The country also imposes a coffee cess, although the exact rates are unclear. 9.In Uganda, taxation rates differ between commodities and districts, distorting markets and prices. 10 Agricultural taxation by local governments has been characterized by leakages in revenue, negative impacts on income distribution, and negative impacts on economic growth due to distortion in relative prices of goods and services. The same study also showed that flatrate taxation was regressive because it disproportionately burdened small-scale traders. 11India is known for its thriving agriculture, which plays a crucial role in the country's economy and supports the lives of millions. In India, a well-developed three-tier taxation structure is based on the central, state, and local governments. The federal government does not levy income tax on agriculture; the state government imposes and collects these taxes. Legislative powers, including taxation, are distributed between the Parliament and the State Legislature.Tax incentives like tax holidays are common, and they help companies offset the cost of doing business, for example, inadequate public infrastructure. 12. India also has the Agriculture Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) established under the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Acts of the states pursuant to the model State Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act (Government of India, 2003), which provides for the following: o Single-point market fee levy in the country's entire marketing process, including inter-state trade; the market fee collection should be commensurate with services and facilities offered to the seller and buyer. Under this provision, the States charge a marketing fee of 1-2% on an ad valorem basis, with the proportion varying depending on the commodity.o Levying cess on primary agricultural produce and not on processed commodities, but user charges can be levied based on the use of the services and infrastructure.o Tax simplification. This provision uniformizes State-level taxation and fees paid on agricultural produce.o Public-private partnership for integrated agriculture infrastructural development and management.o Creation of market committee funds that cater to market establishment, market services, and infrastructural development expenses only 13 .In Australia, the levy is determined by industry actors who identify the specific need that the levy would address. Then, they would present a proposal to the members through the government department. Producers/value chain actors may pay more than one type of levy aimed at addressing a particular need in the industry. Some of the levies are:o Grain levies determined as the farm-gate value of the produce as a net of the marketing costs like storage, handling, and transportation14.o Beef production levy is charged at the abattoir, and if the carcass is condemned or rejected as unfit for human consumption or if the family consumes the carcass, then the levy is not paid.o Cattle and livestock transaction levy paid on each transaction where ownership changes.Poultry industry levies include a) An egg promotion levy payable to commercial egg production only. The producer pays the levy to the seller who submits the returns; b) Laying chickens levy payable on chicken hatched in a hatchery. The producer pays the levy through the hatchery proprietor, where the laying chickens are hatched. Levies are not paid if fewer than 1,000 chickens were hatched at the hatchery in the levy (financial) year or if laying chickens die or are destroyed within 48 hours of hatching. 15; c) Meat chickens levy payable on meat chickens hatched in a hatchery; d) Horse disease response levy paid to raise monies expended in response to an animal disease outbreak affecting horses.There are five statutory agriculture and horticulture levy bodies representing different agricultural commodity sectors. The bodies are funded by farmers and growers, who receive services like research and development, market information, marketing, and trade development. The AHDB is managed independently of the commercial industry and government, allowing for the segregation of funds collected from each commodity sector.Funds raised from each commodity sector benefit only that sector. Levying applies to primary producers and further up the supply chain, except for horticulture, where it applies only to primary producers. Producers pay the bulk of the levy. The levy payment is based on a certain turnover threshold (GBP 50,000), below which no levy is charged. 16.Systems in the non-African states, similar to the example of Tanzania, seem to have direct benefits to the levy payer and the community at large. The grain levy, for instance, in Australia, targets the promotion of the interests of the grain industry. The same applies to beef, poultry, and other levies. Targeting cess collections to provide services for the specific value chain payers is a direct way for stakeholders to finance their public good services.The taxation systems in these states not only present principles and practices that Kenya could benchmark to reform cess collection and use but have also led to the development and implementation of favorable taxation policies for agricultural stakeholders. These policies have proven beneficial in various ways, providing a strong case for their adoption in Kenya.Agricultural producers are cushioned from over-taxation by setting minimum thresholds of turnover before attracting tax, by capping taxation minimum and maximum rates, and by implementing specified exemptions. Agricultural taxpayers participate actively in determining levies and rates and also how the collections are utilized. In addition, the practices satisfy the sound taxation principles proposed by the World Bank, i.e., non-distortionary for markets, equity, efficient to administer, and not resulting in tax avoidance. 13 Government of India, (2013), Agriculture Marketing to Promote Reforms 14 Government of Australia, (2016b), Grain Trade Australia: Australian Grain Industry -Code of practice technical guide document No. 13, 2016 15 Government of Australia, (2017), Laying chicken levy 16 Van der Veen, (2007), Exploring agricultural taxation in Europe. LEI, The Hague India's practice of single-point levying, which ensures efficient tax administration, is a model of security and trust. This approach minimizes tax evasion and avoidance, as fees cannot be levied for a second time under any name, including cess, user charge, or service charge. The practice of tax capping further deters tax-evasive behaviour. The United Kingdom also follows a similar model, with a minimum turnover before taxation. However, it's important to note that the capping range must be narrow enough to minimize non-uniformity and market distortion, ensuring the system's efficiency and trustworthiness.The powers to impose taxes and charges are enshrined in the Constitution under Articles 209 and 210 to the national and county governments. Though devolution has empowered counties powers to collect revenue at the county level, they have experienced challenges because they have not enacted legislation to facilitate the collection of revenues. The rationale for collecting cess is that it is meant for the development and benefit of the county and is therefore collected to improve infrastructure and facilitate economic growth.The cess, a levy on agricultural produce, was initially collected under section 201 of the repealed Local Government Act Cap 256 and section 192 A of the repealed Agriculture Act to form part of the local authority revenue. The constitutionality of cess was determined in the case of the Cereal Growers Association and Hugo Wood vs. county governments of Narok, Nairobi, Nyeri, and eight others. The Court held that it was unconstitutional for county governments to impose and levy agricultural cess and related taxes without any supporting legislation.The team studied various documents in reviewing legislation (See Appendix II for details). Below are highlighted a few of these.Article 209 (3) stipulates that a county government may impose property rates, entertainment taxes, and any other tax authorized by an Act of Parliament. Parliament can authorize counties to impose a tax, which implies that a new county tax can be initiated by the National Government and through county legislation.The object and purpose of the Tea Act is to establish the Tea Board of Kenya to develop, promote, and regulate the development of the tea industry and promote accountability in the sector by promptly paying tea farmers and by giving them more power in the running of tea factories. The Act under section 3 establishes the Tea Board of Kenya, charged with the responsibility of, among others, advising county governments on agricultural cess and fees as stipulated under section 5(1)(s). It also stipulates that fees imposed by a county government shall not be prejudicial to national economic policies, economic activities across county boundaries or national mobility of goods, services, capital or labour.The Crops Act of 2013 states that a county Government may impose fees for the development of agricultural crops, issuance of trade licenses to any person trading in scheduled crops, and issuance of licenses for cooperative societies dealing with scheduled crops within the county. Section 17(3) provides that \"fees imposed by a county government shall not in any way prejudice national economic policies, economic activities across county boundaries or national mobility of goods, services, and capital.\" It is, therefore, clear that county levies on crops should be reasonably modeled to benefit the farmer and, at the same time, not affect the national economic policies, especially on exports.This provides that the Authority shall, in consultation with county governments, perform the function of advising the national and county governments on agricultural levies for purposes of planning, and enhancing harmony and equity in the sector.Section 4(1) provides that the county government shall collect a charge of 1% of gross sales on flower services within the county. In contrast, Section 4(2) states that the proceeds of the charge collected will be used for the infrastructural development of the area. In Section 12, the authorized officer shall ensure that the charge on flower service from the county on transit to other counties is collected at barriers set up at the points of entry as per regulations made by the Executive Committee Member and shall ensure that all the amounts collected are accounted for and remitted to the county government.The Act provides for introducing the Tea Cess and using and managing it. It states that the cess shall be deducted from the green leaf proceeds of each grower registered to a tea factory. The amount shall be determined by the County Executive Member for finance in consultation with the County Executive Member for agriculture and approved by the County Executive. It shall not exceed 1% of the green leaf payment.Part III of the Act provides for payment of cess. Section 6(1) states that \"the cess imposed under this Act shall be payable by the agricultural producer to the county government through the processing plant at the time when the plant takes delivery of the produce.\" Section 8 states that, \"The authorized officer shall ensure that cess on agricultural produce from the county on transit to other counties is collected at barriers set up at the points of entry and shall ensure that all the amounts collected are accounted for and remitted to the county government.\"Section 6 provides for payment of the cess, levy, and charges. These will be done at the place of production or any other place designated by the Executive Committee Member. In the case of products brought into the county from outside, payment will be made at the place of delivery of the product or as may be chosen by the Executive Committee Member. Section 8 provides that the money collected as cess charges shall be used to maintain county roads.Section 5(1) provides that APC shall not be levied on agricultural products that are declared essential. Subsection 2 stipulates that the County Executive Committee Member (CECM), in consultation with the CECM in charge of agriculture, may review, declare, and publish essential produce that, in their opinion, is necessary for purposes of this Act. Section 11(4) provides that payment of cess shall not apply to agricultural products not produced in the county that are on transit through the county on national trunk roads and to which cess has already been paid in another county.The County Finance Acts are expected to set the revenue raising measures by county governments in a particular year as stipulated under Section 132 of the Public Finance Management Act, 2012. Article 210 of the Constitution provides that \"no tax or licensing fees may be imposed, waived or varied except as provided by legislation.\" In that regard, county governments are expected to enact enabling county revenue legislation before enacting the County Finance Acts to anchor their taxes, fees, and charges.6. Policy reviewKenya's Vision 2030 forms the primary basis for evaluating the country's economic policy and promotes community empowerment through increased efficiency and impact of devolved funds. It is proposed that this can be achieved by increasing the amount, efficiency, and impact of devolved funds and by increasing public participation and the voices of the poorest members of local communities so that development issues of concern to such members can be channeled into public policy.Vision 2030 is anchored on three key economic, social, and political pillars. Given that Vision 2030 will inform all the country's policies, it is of utmost significance that the county revenue legislation be drafted to implement and promote its long-term development blueprint.County governments are required to incorporate national policy and an enabling fiscal environment for economic transformation into their budgeting process and implement programs indicated in their County Integrated Development Plans (CIDPs), County Fiscal Strategy papers, and Finance bills.For agriculture to play a pivotal role in trade development, coordination between the national and county governments is crucial. The National Trade Policy, therefore, envisions a situation where activities of the national and county governments are steered under a coherent framework that reflects the new constitutional dispensation to avoid institutional-related constraints in the process of promoting trade in agriculture and agro-processed products.The Cabinet approved this policy on 14 August 2018. It was occasioned by the need to address the underperformance of county governments' Own Source Revenue (OSR) caused by challenges in collecting and administrating decentralized taxes, fees, and charges. The policy aims to assist counties in optimizing OSR by setting up a standardized policy and the legal and institutional framework for local revenue-raising measures.This policy discourages the imposition of cess except for agricultural produce. That notwithstanding, counties intending to impose cess should develop supportive legislative frameworks indicating that the levy is for infrastructure development and that a percentage of collections will be ploughed back into the sectors from which it was generated. The policy also requires counties to develop a Tariff and Pricing Policy justifying the rationale for levying fees and charges as stipulated under Sec 120 of the County Governments Act.The marketing of agricultural produce often attracts several forms of taxation, including levies, Value-Added Tax, cess, export tariffs, and import duties. The imposition of levies across counties at numerous produce inspection stations hinders the movement of agricultural products to urban markets and reduces their competitiveness, both locally and internationally.This policy highlights the need to promote and facilitate agricultural trade and the marketing of high-quality agricultural products. It expects the two levels of government to ensure that roadblocks are controlled and gazetted to eliminate illegal taxation of agricultural produce and to continually monitor, evaluate, and regulate levies and taxes charged on such products. To promote and conduct effective capacity building programs in the counties to necessitate a good understanding of the law and how it can be applied. This involves:Unbundling cess and other market-related levies.Standardization.Establishing parameters for determination of cess and other market-related levies.Promoting clarity and understanding on cess and other market-related charges.Providing uniform standards, norms, guidelines, and practices when applying cess and other market-related levies.Eliminating arbitrary charges based on unjustifiable and non-scientific methods of determining the amount of cess and levies chargeable.Government is committed to improving awareness and understanding of cess and other market-related levies and their application to promote intercounty trade, enhancing free flow of goods and services; and making Kenya competitive in attracting Foreign Direct Investment (FDI).Government will work with counties and other stakeholders to develop the necessary policy instruments to enhance uniformity and standardization in using cess and other market-related levies.In consultation with stakeholders, the government will promote the use of scientific approaches in determining cess and other market-related levies.While reiterating the need for the government to raise revenue for economic development is a globally acceptable practice by law, there is a need to consider the net impact of tax regimes, especially when the taxes hurt most of the population (mainly consumers and producers who bear the cost). This is particularly important in Kenya, where agriculture is the backbone of the country's economy. Careful and strategic assessment of these charge provisions is paramount. It is crucial to strike a balance between revenue generation for county governments and supporting the growth and competitiveness of the agricultural sector.The burden of the cess and market-related levies has prompted various stakeholders to address the Government of Kenya and advocate for policy reforms. This ongoing dialogue process, which ASNET coordinates, underscores the urgency of reforming the structure and application of the system to ensure fair and equitable taxation that promotes sustainable agricultural development and benefits all stakeholders involved.Given the substantial impact of these cess regimes on consumers and producers in the vital agricultural sector, it is crucial that the country promotes an efficient and transparent system that bolsters the growth of the sector. Therefore, the Government of Kenya should develop a policy and reform legislation to rationalize the levels of cess, and regulatory licenses and permits in partnership with the private sector. This will serve to create a harmonized and non-distorted market environment. The proposed policy measures are essential for achieving fairness, equity, and effectiveness in taxing agricultural commodities and services.In line with these recommendations, the following policy actions should be taken:o Develop and enact a national legislation to harmonize the collection of cess and other market levies in the counties in line with Article 209 (5). Although counties have legislated on charges and levies as empowered by Article 185(2), these are in conflict and irregular. To harmonize the county-level laws, there is need for a national law to put in place standards and uniformity to avoid prejudicing national economic interests, economic activities across county boundaries, and the mobility of goods, services, capital and labour. It will address multiple taxation, distribution across counties, and vehicle branding challenges.o Address inconsistencies in current laws through amendments to align the laws with the assignment of functions between the national and county governments as provided in the Constitution of Kenya. This will streamline policies and practices at the county governments on developmental and regulatory responsibilities in the agricultural sector, with the National Government refraining from levying charges for functions delegated to the counties. It will foster better governance and resource management at the local level.o Implement a nationally applicable capping mechanism on the minimum and maximum charging rates to ensure uniformity and market stability while preventing undue burdens on stakeholders.o Establish a single point of cess collection within the value chain, preferably in the county of origin or destination, to streamline the taxation process and reduce transaction costs.o Base cess charges on the actual services provided to cess-payers while determining business and regulatory license fees according to the actual cost of services rendered. This approach promotes fairness and prevents overcharging.o Charging should only be done at the county level. The National Government and its agencies should leave developmental and regulatory aspects of the agricultural sector to county governments and not levy charges for functions in agriculture that have been devolved to these governments.o Consult with the Intergovernmental Budget and Economic Council (IBEC) and the Council of Governors to build consensus and align with policy.o Ensure proper public participation during the county and national legislative process for cess, thus guaranteeing that county governments uphold the values of accountability and transparency in the administration of cess collections. Public input is essential for building trust and ensuring that cess revenues are effectively utilized to benefit the agricultural sector and its stakeholders.o Strengthening capacity to improve revenue administration, including cess and mechanisms for accountability at the county level, should be instituted.o Invest part of the agricultural levies and cess collected back into the agricultural sector, with well-defined guidelines on how to do this to enhance accountability.Even as discussions continue on the issue of APC and other market levies and how they impact the country's trade policy goals, there is a need to recognize the potential of these levies to generate revenue for county governments. However, ensuring they are implemented efficiently and do not stifle agricultural productivity and market competitiveness is equally important. Suppose the cumbersome and more restrictive double taxation and licensing regime is not in the country's best interest. In that case, there is a need to take a bold step of eliminating the bottlenecks to make it more effective.Studies conducted by private sector organizations and academia have revealed that businesses in Kenya, especially those engaged in trade and supply of goods or services across counties, are subjected to multiple taxation in relation to cess, distribution, and branding of vehicles. The multiple taxation has resulted in increased cost of living and cost of doing business, thus slowing business growth and employment creation.To find a permanent and workable solution to the issue of double taxation, several consultation forums coordinated by ASNET have been held, more so on the issue of cess and other market-related levies. These dialogues have resulted in developing a private sector-led position paper that strongly advocates for strengthening public-private sector dialogue to eliminate restrictive trade policies and practices, resulting in multiple licenses that hinder the free movement of goods and services throughout the country. Engaging in frequent stakeholder consultations helps in crafting inclusive and less combative solutions. Engagement with businesses, workers, unions, and civil society brings on board diverse perspectives and fuels better outcomes.By fostering transparency, accountability, and evidence-based decision-making in cess and other market levies policy, the Government of Kenya can create an enabling environment that facilitates agricultural productivity, stimulates investment, and ensures food security for its citizens.8. Appendices ","tokenCount":"8168"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/1815897703.json b/data/part_2/1815897703.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ac398ae9230de7247ba22d002b9df144d9b5e2d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/1815897703.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"d05dc104631d5288664d9f0421accddf","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://publications.iwmi.org/pdf/H026314.pdf","id":"-796685990"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"aa07923f-0d2d-4d79-9c32-fd54aebe1d9b","pagecount":"89","content":"I dry seeding, and short duration varieties constituted a package requiring mechanization, timely water supplies, and varieties that ripen in 3.0-3.5 months. Tractors were made available, but water conditions were never such that farmers were induced to change from traditional practices. Dry sowing is now rare.Farmers seem to prefer to ensure one good wet season rice crop, use irrigation water for land preparation and crop growth, and plant 4.0-4.5 month rice varieties.Uncertainty over water and lack of marketing arrangements were major constraints to crop diversitication and adoption of non-rice crops. Water management was Micult since it had to be adapted to two markedly different sods under a turnout.In MIRP, mechanization for dry tillage is given up, crop diversification is limited, and the package of dry tillage, dry seeding and short duration varieties are not insisted on, though still recommended.Irrigation uuwWum. Large scale adoption of parallel, lined rectangular one cusec (28.3 liters per second) channels serving head, middle and tail end areas separately and independently was a major innovation attempted. When the agricultural innovations were not adopted and land preparation for wet sowing of rice brought peak water demands, the one cusec channels proved unsatisfactory. Therefore, in MIRP, the channels are designed to carry up to two cwem if all freeboard is used. Lining is to be done only where needed and channels will be earthen and trapezoidal in crm-section.The original design in TlMP limited irrigation deliveries to 12 hours per day, so that no farmers would have to irrigate at night. Rotational schedules were prepared to achieve this objective but it proved impossible to operate the systems in daylight hours only. Rotations were later changed to 24 hour irrigation for a set number of hours per week. The rotational schedule was modified for MIRP by rescheduling discharges to permit all gate operations to be in daylight hours.The installation of cross-regulators has been a major benefit to water on control in the main channels of the systems.Cross regulation is being provided in MIRF' and several other systems at the present time.TIMP relied very heavily on weir boxes for measurement at distributary and field channel Iqvels. They were perceived by farmers as restricting flows and were widely damaged. MIRP is moving towards installing broad crested weirs, which, although mom. expensive, are more durable.IWtiWkdituUMItMls . The transfer of design activities in TlMP from Colombo to a town nearer to the projea is the first case of major devolution of design in Sri Lanka, and has been adopted in Gal Oya and MIRP.-2 1 -The establishment of Tank Committees under TIMP was the first major effort in Sri Lanka to involve farmers formally in managing major irrigation systems. The tank committee structwe has evolved into the project manager system of INMAS, the national effort to improve water management through the IMD. This system has also been adopted for all MIRP tanks. TIMP had no plans to organize farmers. vd ~' I ~I E were used to undertake several water management tasks, including implementation of the rotational schedules, representation of the farmers at the tank committee, and liaison with government officers. It was not satisfactory. Later, efforts were made to organize field channel groups with contact farmers in a system parallel to the contact farmer for the training and visit (T&V) system. These efforts were largely introduced after all design work had been completed.In MIRP, farmer organization is a specific objective of the early phase of the project. Institutional organizers (10s) whose task is to organi7.e farmers into field and distributary channel groups have been hired. In MIRP, there has already becn a substantive effort to involve farmers in planning and redesign. The different approach to institutional arrangements in MIRP can only partly be attributed to the experiences of TIMP. There have also been inputs from the Gal Oya experience.TIMP has contributed significantly to improved understanding of the requirements of rehabilitation projects in Sri Lanka. Many lessons learned have been incorporated into planning and implementation of some subsequent rehabilitation projects like MIRP.Five reports and papers representing the views of a mid-term evaluation review team, the contractor for implementation of rehabilitation, researchers, and the final evaluation review team are chosen as a basis for reviewing the Gal Oya experiedce.A study of the Gal Oya Water Management Project was conducted by a Review team of five members (Keller et al. 1982) at the request of USAIDISri Lanka. It was intended to serve as a project review document and includesthe team's conclusions and recommendations with supporting background statements. The team identified and pinpointed the constraints which slowed the development of the project and reduced its effectiveness and then developed aset of recommendations for overcoming them.The concept of pragmiitic rciw6liitatim was the main outcome of the review. Instead of using the \"textbook approach\" to specifying rehabilitation requirements, a more relaxed design approach was recommended and utilized. This approach is to set up standards and criteria in order to do the minimum work necessary to get the desired results in terms of canal safety, stability and carrying capacity. This approach reduces surveying, design and construction costs considerably.The team also emphasized institutional development and the importance of socioeconomic research and water users' associations. This was a fundamental component of the Gal Oya water management program. Neither the rehabilitation of the water storage and delivery system nor the proposed new rational and comparatively stringent O&M measures can ever achieve their purpose unless accompanied by institutional improvements. Assistance is needed to guide and enforce the recommended management measures and to gain the enthusiastic participation of the ultimate users of the project, the farmers. The team endorsed the consultant's (PRC) view that if the Irrigation Department was unwilling to accept the responsibility for integrated water management, then perhaps efforts should be made either to find another agency that would accept this responsibility, or create a new agency.The report contains many recommendations which led to a redirection of the rehabilitation effort of the Gal Oya project and extension of the project life by about 21 months. PRC Engineering Consultants International (1985) was the contractor for the Gal Oya Water Management Project with responsibility primarily for planning, modemization/rehabilitat~on, O&M, and training. The final report prepared by the contractor provides an account of the activities under the prqect, the project outputs, the problems encountered, and the findings that could be useful for future rehabilitation projects.The findings cover a wide range of issues. The following are the points the contractor believed are most important for modernization and/or rehabilitation, and project O&M (PRC 1985):1.Inputs from water users' associations (WUA) are not necessary for the rehabilitation of conveyance systems but would be advantageous. The exception is that the farmers' input is required in the preparation of the general management and work plan. The rehabilitation of a field channel must have farmers' participation, with or without a WUA.The general O&M procedures that will be implemented following rehabilitation should be determmed as part of the general management and work plan. Specific requirements of the operations plan which will affect water control must be included in the design criteria.Training of the project's O&M staff should be implemented as early as possible.The training of non-Imgation Department personnel, particularly local officials and other influential individuals in the community will greatly help the acceptance of water management as a needed means of helping the farmers. It should have a long term effect in maintaining the WUAs as viable organizations and may assist in their federation and the formation of an advisory committee to assist the project manager in setting policy. This is a useful and informative report presenting the contractor's overview of the project and the problems encountered.In a comprehensive case study, Wijayaratna (1987) analyzes the rehabilitation effort and experience of the Gal Oya Left Bank System. The paper highlights the innovative and successful approaches used in various phases and activities of the project. It also examines the constraints encountered and deficiencies observed in all stages of the project. This review draws upon these aspects as they have lessons appricable to future rehabilitation endeavors.The innovative elements identified are the following:The pragmatic approach to design and construction was considered successful in practice. Thi basic concept of the pragmatic approach was to \"...conduct a physical inspection of the system and to determine what was needed to be done to ensure hydraulic efficiency and to stabilize the canal banks. This approach had to rely heavily on the judgment of the design engineers.\" This is quoted approvingly by Wijayaratna (1987277) from the final evaluation of Gal Oya.Mobilization of local knowledge and farmer participation in system management. Farmer involvement in the design process through group mechanisms no doubt improved the quality of Gal Oya rehabilitation work. At the early stages of the redesign process, each of the farmer groups had two rounds of meetings with the design -23 .engineers. Later, due to time constraints, these group meetings were replaced by walk-along-thechannel meetings between fanner groups and design engineers. Fanner organizations are now said to be functioning BS real organktions with viable operating stTuctures and continuous records of their efficient involvement in water management.Computer model for system operation. There is no doubt that this has been helpful in enhancing the efficiency of water scheduling and operational decisions. However, this will not compensate for inadequacy of data on extents cultivated under different off-takes and on drainage.The following constraints are identified and discussed t I .Unrealistic assumptions during the planning phase. In the author's opinion, one of the major gains expected by the sponsoring agencies from the proposed farmer organizations was to get farmers to take responsibility for rehabilitation work in the field channels. However, farmers were never consulted about this in advance and no agreement was reached before hand. hadequate data. For example, the lengths of different categories of channels were not known, much less the extent of cultivated area. Inadequate attention was paid to drainage, re-use and soil characteristics.Limited impact of rehabilitation on production. As the direct major influence of the rehabilitation program is limited to system-wide improvements in water availability, such a program may not provide solutions to the non-water factors responsible for the yield gap.Overseas training. Over the project period, 133 participants were sent abroad for short-term training and nine were sent for long-term training. Despite the fact that some of these contributed positively to the project's success, most were of very little value to the project or to water management improvements in the country as a whole.The use of original design specifications in rehabilitation. The initial conception of the Gal Oya left bank rehabilitation was to restore the physical system to original design specifications. However, this was not possible because the latter could not be found. Some of the original specifications may not be appropriate for the changed conditions of the project --the actual command area had increased significantly over the past three decades. Rehabilitation should provide an opportunity to benefit from changes in technology that have occurred since the inception of a project.Coordination among line agencies. The work required by the local agencies (other than the Irrigation Department) to achieve the project objectives was not adequately defined in the project paper. In addition, lack of proper t 2.6.coordination and cooperation among agencies was observed to be a constraint during project implementation.Limitations in benefit-cost evaluations of rehabilitation efforts. Calculations of benefits and costs in these studies (ex-ante and ex-post), depend on assumptions about the area that could be irrigated, the yields that could be obtained after the project is completed, the extent lo which the benefits are correlated with a project's implementation, and so forth. The difficulty in substantiating such assumptions has been demonstrated by the author. Benefit-cost evaluations, therefore, could be misleading at times. The internal rate of return calculated for the Left Bank system rehabilitation varied from 47.4 percent (ISTI 1985) to 17 percent (ART1 evaluation).On the whole, Wijayaratna's paper is a very useful case study especially in planning for new rehabilitation efforts in other projects.The final evaluation of the Gal Oya Left Bank Rehabilitation Project was conducted hy the International Institute for Science and Technology (ISTI) in 1985. A six member multi-disciplinary team carried out the evaluation. The team's evaluation methodology included a review of available documents, interviews with USAID and government dfcials in Colombo, and a week long field visit to Amparai.The overall assessment of the project is that, by any reasonable standard, the project as a whole hag definitely been a success in spite of some mistakes made in the design and execution. The achievements listed are: I) a badly detericrated major irrigation scheme has been rehabilitated in a cost-effective manner, and is operational; 2) fornied and are functioning despite a fragmented social structure; 3) changes in agronomic practices, increased yields and increased cropping intensity, all due at least partly to improved water delivery and reliability, have combined with an increase in irrigated area to produce an internal rate of return of 47.4 percent. ISTI (1985) concluded the project has substantially achieved its purpose of developing an institutional capability, which can be replicated to manage large irrigation schemes in Sri Lanka more efficiently and effectively with active farmer assistance. The capability and methodology developed at Gal Oya can and should be extended to other schemes, but this will require adaptation to different physical and social environments.One of the most important outcomes of the project is the change in attitude, communication and behavior among farmers and government personnel that has occurred at Gal Oya. All the available evidence points to a major change in this regard (see Merrey and Murray-Rust 1987). This is a very important project achievement and should not be underestimated.The factors that contributed to the overall project outcome according to the review are: 1) the improved reliability of water delivery as a result of rehabilitation; 2) the Institutional Organizer program and the farmer organizations it created; 3) the leadership of the Project Director, who actively promoted communication by direction and by example; and 4) the training program (which Wlj'ayaratna [ 19871 criticizes).Ethnic disturbances have adversely affected the project and have retarded rehabilitation of the tail end of the system.On the project strategy and components, the review contends that the strategy, as it evolved, was appropriate for the project's goals and purpose, but that it differed significantly from the strategy set forth in the original project design.The original project paper included: 1) an overemphasis on heavy equipment -the equipment was provided, but utilization was very low and maintenance was a continuing problem; 2) an overemphasis on detailed planning and the preparation of master plans. The adoption of the pragmatic approach to design and construction, as suggested by the mid-term evaluation, was a key element in the successful rehabilitation; 3) an overemphasis on research and testing; and 4) the absence of a specific plan and specific funding for rehabilitation of distributary and field channels. Distributary channels and structures in field channels were provided for in the amendment to the project paper. Who would do the field channel earthwork remained unsolved. Both the original and the final strategy paid inadequate attention to maintenance.Merrey and Murray-Rust (1987), based on interviews with two key Irrigation Department officials two years a k r the end of project evaluation, report that these officials confirm the general evaluation of the imporlance of the farmers' organizations and other institutional efforts in the rehabilitation project, the usefulness of the pragmatic approach to rehabilitation, and most important, the farmers' organizations' continued existence and operation.Just as the MlRP was developed based on experience with the TIMP, with funding from the World Bank and other sources, the Irrigation Systems Management (ISM) Project has been developed from the experience with the Gal Oya Project. The ISM Projed has funding from USAID, and is designed to continue testing and improving the approach used for organizing fanners at Gal Oya, and to test a rehabilitation approach called essential structural improvements (ESI) that is thought to be even more cost-effective than pragmatic rehabilitation. The original project concept was in fact not as a rehabilitation project p a se, but as a project to develop a capacity and a process in the Irrigation Department to carry out continuous maintenance and upgrading of irrigation systems that would not stop at the end of the project. In addition, the project aims to strengthen the IMDs capacity to implement the INMAS program, particularly in developing strong farmers' organizations, and in developing a performance and fmancial monitoring capability. Implementation of the project has just begun.To date, Merrey (1987) provides the only attempt to do a comparative analysis of Sri Lanka's imgation system rehabilitation and modernization experience. He describes an analytical framework for comparing the degree to which rehabilitation projects focus on institution-building, and applies the framework to six Sri Lankan rehabilitation projects, to test the hypothesis that those projects which build strong responsible farmers' organizations supported by management agencies responsive to the needs of these organizations are more likely to exhibit s u w m h [ e improvements in productivity and equity than those that primarily emphasize physical reconstruction.The experience gained by an organization in implementing innovations in a rehabilitation project was utilized in making modifications in the design of a subsequent rehabilitation project.Standard approaches to designing irrigation projects may not be appropriate for some rehabilitation projects, and innovative and pragmatic rehabilitation approaches may be called for. Design engineers should be prepared to innovate to suit the context of a project.A mid-term evaluation by competent experts can lead to appropriate mid-course corrections and redirection of a rehabilitation effort. Unrealistic assumptions made during the planning and design phase with limited data can be checked and corrected.Farmer involvement in the design process through group mechanism can improve the quality of rehabilitation work; it can also lead to farmers taking greater responsibility for system O&M after rehabilitation.The use of specially trained catalysts like Institutional Organizers (10s) to develop farmers' organizations has had a very beneficial effect and has been adopted on a wider scale.The projects reviewed vary considerably in terms of their emphasis physical improvements versus institutional strengthening. It appears likely that institutional strengthening is extremely important if physical improvements are going to be used effectively by farmers, and for long term sustainability of the improvements. However, thii questioh deserves further research as well.What mechanisms can be developed to improve communication among agencies (even in countries such as Sri Lanka), donors, and other interested parties to spread the rehabilitation lessons learned in different projects? Donors and lending agencies seem to have their own.preferences for different mixes of hardware (physical rehabilitation of a system) and software (the organizational and institutional dimensions of a system). Questions are often raised on the appropriateness of the mix. More research is needed to help answer the question.More specifically, in relationship to the question of hardware versus software, some literature suggests that systems require rehabilitation or improvement in part because of institutional weaknesses (ineffective organizations, poor farmer-agency communications, inadequate O&M resources). If this is so, what emphasis should be given to institutional strengthening, and how should this be related to physical improvements? Would institutional strengthening lead to more susiaiwbk improvements in irrigation system performance?The rehabilitation process, the decision making, and the interactions among the various interested parties, is an area which is not much researched and deserves greater attention, in order to understand better why rehahilita: tion projects are designed the way they are, and to suggest alternative approaches. Some literature suggests that more appropriate methods are required for evaluating rehabilitation project options, and evaluating the long term benefits of such projects afterwards. What would be appropriate criteria for such analyses and evaluations, and what methods would be required to base analyses on such criteria?Generating resources for irrigation O&M2 is crucial to achieving the objectives of irrigation for several reasons. One concern is mobilizing sufficient rewurces to enable the desired level of O&M. According to Perera (1986), almost all major irrigation schemes in Sri Lanka have suffered from poor maintenance due to lack of sufficient funds during the past years. According to Gunesekera (1985), Rs 120 million (USS3.75 million) is needed per year for O&M of systems outside of the Mahaweli. The Irrigation Department budget allocation is only half this. The government cannot afford to pay full O&M costs and achieve other social welfare goals.Perera (1986) says the farmers have been badly affected due to the poor performance of the irrigation systems as a result of inadequate maintenance. Goonesekera (1985) found poor physical maintenance to be the most important technical constraint in Phase I of the Kaudulla irrigation system. He attributed this to the decline in funds available for maintenance. The funds allocated for maintenance were primarily used for wages, travel expenses, and supplies. Only Rs 300,000 -400,000 (US$9,375 -US%12,500) were available for actual maintenance, and this was not sufficient for even minor repairs.As Small et al. (1986) concluded, the institutional arrangements for mobilizing resources also affect the performance of irrigation systems. These arrangements determine the incentives that irrigation agency staff have to proyide good irrigation services. Another of Goonesekera's (1985) conclusions was the need to provide irrigation managers with financial incentives to provide good management. The institutional arrangements also influence farmers' willingness to participate in the O&M of systems through paying irrigation service fees and contributing labor.Under conditions of water pricing, the irrigation charge can also provide an incentive for farmers to use water more efficiently. Karunanayake (1982) advocates volumetric pricing of water to promote more efficient use. He recognizes that this requires a great deal of control over the water to supply it on demand, and accurate measurement of the supply to each farmer. In some systems, chargingon a volumetric basis would not be possible without major rehabilitation of the system. An alternative would be wholesaling water in bulk at the tum-out level and allowing the farmers' organization to distribute it and collect from individual fanners. This requires much less measurement, but viable farmer organizations are a necessity.Historical Reviews Thompson (1987) examined imgation fmancing policies primarily in the British period through a study of documents in the archives. Ordinance No. 14 of 1848 permitted the colonial government to charge six days of compulsory labor per year for repair and upkeep of roads and irrigation works. Ordinance No. 21 of 1867 introduced the first irrigation rate of British times. The purpose was to recover the cost to the government of improving imgation facilities. Beneficiaries were required to pay the cost of a project in 10 annual installments. The amount was decided beforehand, and cost overruns could not be included in the rate charged. A maximum water rate of six shillings/me/year was established, with maintenance and repairs to be undertaken and expenses defrayed by the government.In 1872 beneficiaries were given a choice of paying the 10 installments or paying in perpetuity for interest on the capital cost plus maintenance. Under this option the annual assessment was not to exceed Re l/acre or seven percent of the Cost of the works. Annual payments could be in cash or kind.Authorization to collect a mavlteMflce h g e was extended to government-aided works in Ordinance 42 of 1884. This applied in c a w where the capital cost was being repaid in 10 equal installments. The in-perpetuity payment option already included maintenance costs. Funds were used to maintain the system from which it was collected. The maintenance charge was not to exceed 75 cents/acre/year and was due 1 April each year. Land could be repossessed by the government for non-payment of capital or maintenance costs.In 1889 the maximum maintenance charge was reduced from 75 cents to 10 cents/acre/year with assessments to be revised every year. Movable property of defaulters had to be sold before land. In the 1890s a concern of the Central Irrigation Board was that collection of monies to be repaid to the Irrigation Fund was not being enforced.Ordinance 10 of 1901 raised the maximum rate to be levied in perpetuity from Re 1 to Rs 2 per acre (to cover interest on capital expended and maintenance). The maximum rate for maintenance on system that were being repaid in 10 installments was raised from 10 to 50 centslacre. A four percent interest charge was added to total costs repayable plus the maintenance charge beginning at completion of construction instead of the end of the ten year repayment period.By 1910 the Irrigation Department had 151,253 acres (61,236 ha) in major works. During that year it had expended Rs 10,999,149 on restoration or construction and Rs 2,151,208 on maintenance and repairs, and had recovered a total of Rs 1,046,632 in perpetuity and maintenance rates and Rs 14,674 in repayment installments.In 1914 the Irrigation Department reported that the maintenance rate was Rs I.O7/acre whereas the government's mt was Rs 1.54/acre exclusive of staff charges, plant, etc. In 1915, the government recovered a maintenance rate that averaged 70 cents/acre. The Committee on Food Production in 1919 noted that the program on new irrigation works had been virtually suspended during the past ten years because of government policy relegating the Irrigation Department to a revenue earning department with all operations considered from the perspective of commercial profit. It recommended that the -2 8 -Irrigation Department be reclassified as a spending department and that the current irrigation rate of approximately Rs 2 be suspended for five years to stimulate rice cultivation; these recommendations were accepted.An irrigation rates committee was established in 1926 to determine the mean maintenance rate of the systems maintained by the Irrigation Department. Two types of works were examined: 1) works whose repayment scheme was in perpetuity, and 2) aided works (where owners had agreed to pay the construction cost in annual installments plus an annual maintenance fee). It concluded that proprietors under the \"perpetuity\" works who had originally been assessed an irrigation rate of Re 1 were in a favored position. It also concluded that fanners in large schemes in the dry zone were unable to pay a perpetuity rate or a construction rate and maintenance rate of more than Rs Z/acre per annum due to production risks and labor scarcity. The committee recommended that rates be assessed on all irrigable land, not just that irrigated in a particular season. Land cleared from the jungle should not be charged a rate until after three years. Crop lands should not be sold for nonpayment of rates; these should be recovered by selling the crop or if there was no crop, by leasing the land. Thompson (1987) presents data from 1869-1984, with the exception of a 20-year period from 193837 for which she apparently could not locate the data, which show that in most years there was some collection of irrigation fees. Even in the period 1970-77 when irrigation charges were supposedly suspended, there was some revenue.Silva (1986) conducted a study of the evolution of policies relating to the recovery of water charges from farmers, covering the period 1931-84. This study, based on published and unpublished reports and documents of the Sri Lanka government, looks at this subject within the broad framework of rural development and land settlement policies.Historically there was no tradition of making land and water available free of charge. F-njdqa, an arrangement whereby wages were paid in land and rent was paid in labor, was a system of reciprocal obligations between the king and the people. The British outlawed rajakariya, which destroyed the mechanism for maintaining irrigation systems.Ordinance No. 32 of 1946 as amended by Act No. 48 of 1968 provides for: I.the imposition of an irrigation rate upon lands benefited or to be benefited under any scheme; levying of contribution in labor upon allottees and tenant cultivators and, where there are no allottees or tenant cultivators, the proprietors of those lands for the purpose of construction or maintenance of the irrigation work and for the payment on an irrigation rate by way of labor contribution; and levying of special irrigation rates in respect of water derived by seepage, mechanical appliances or other special means.In the late 1960s in negotiations with the World Bank for financing of the initial stages of Mahaweli, the govemment had agreed that after completion of the project an annual rate of at least Rs 4O/acre of cultivated land would be charged. This became an issue in the general election of 1970, and it is believed that this went against the UNP in the election which they lost.The SLFP government in 1970 announced in the first Throne Speech the abolition of irrigation rates and that the state would undertake restoration and maintenance of village tanks and minor irrigation works. This labor, termed wewa mj -, had formerly heen the responsibility of the farmers. In place of irrigation rates, a Land Betterment Charges Law No. 28 to recover cost of irrigation was passed in the National State Assembly in 1976. This, however, was not implemented, and the government changed in 1977.From 1978 under the UNP government, O&M costs were to be recovered through the following charges:Rs 30/acre in major schemes with over 150 percent cropping intensity, Rs 20/acre in major schemes with less than 150 percent cropping intensity and minor schemes with more than 150 percent cropping intensity, and Rs lO/acre in other minor schemes.According to Silva (l986), this policy was actually implemented for only a short period in 1981-83 in major schemes, but collections were minimal3.Regarding land taxes there have been two persistent trends: concern about laud revenue and large-scale noncollection. Currently, the government does not collect any land tax, and Silva argues that it never effectively collected land tax. He concludes that both in assessing the land tax and implementing its recoveries, the policies have been ritualistic.Silva. ( 1986) concludes that the recovery of irrigation charges has also been consistently ineffective. The collectioncost has not been computed, but he argues that it would be higher than the meager sums collected. The charging of an irrigation fee has been a political issue, and many members of parliament have opposed it. He concludes that one of the reasons the government did not vigorously enforce payment of irrigation fees is that they were dealing with an impoverished peasantry which, due to low agricultural production, was unable to produce a surplus that would enable them to pay the fees. While the government has always provided the legal authority for charging beneficiaries a fee for irrigation, for several reasons, including its social welfare ethic, it has not enforced collections with any vigor.However, now the climate regarding charging irrigation service fees has changed according to Silva 1.The government recognizes that systems must at all costs be properly maintained. The Kantalai Tank failure in 1986 drove home this point.The government's resources are extremely limited. It has to borrow from international lending agencies. National policy regarding irrigation service fees is influenced by the policies of the donor agencies.There is new thinking about the management and development of major schemes.There is greater emphasis on forming farmer organizations 2.4.These factors have affected the development of policy concerning collection and management of the present irrigation O&M fee in the major systems managed by both IMD and MEA.The most comprehensive and focussed study on the current policy concerning resource mobilization for O&M of major irrigation systems is the S e ofRec.TTent Cost ko6[ems in Irrigation Systems undertaken by Engineering Consultants Ltd. and Development Planning Consultants Ltd. for USAID (USAID 1985). This study was conducted in 1984 shortly after implementation of the new O&M fee to be charged to all farmers benefitting from major irrigation systems whether under IMDIIrrigation Department or MEA management. The researchers reviewed relevant documents and interviewed officials in Colombo as well as in four major systems and a sample of 94 farmers in these major systems.Based on a study in 1981 of 16 selected irrigation systems -one in each range -the Irrigation Department estimated that on average Rs 200/acre (about US$15.40 per ha) was needed annually to operate and maintain major systems. (Earlier it had estimated the cost at Rs 80/acre, or about US$6.00 per ha.) A high proportion of this m t is for labor becauie the Irrigation Department has a large labor force. The actual cost in a particular system may deviate considerably from Rs 200.In the government's opinion, it could not provide adequate funding for O&M, and a policy was adopted that farmers should be responsible for full cost of O&M, but none of the capital or rehabilitation m t . An O&M fee of Rs 100/acre (about $7.70 per ha) of asweddumked paddy land per year was introduced in 1984. This is not considered a water charge or levy to recover cost of construction or rehabilitation. It is an annual contribution that farmers are required to pay for proper 0 & M of major systems. The balance of the O&M cost was to be allocated by the government through the normal budgetary process. The initial policy called for the O&M fee to be increased by Rs 20 each year for five years, whereupon farmers would be paying Rs 200/acre, the estimated full cost of O&M. According to the study, the differences between this fee and past policies were:1.The amount of the charge was based on the actual cost of O&M It was not considered an irrigation rate or water charge, but a contribution farmers were expected to make to maintain systems in good condition; and Funds were earmarked to be spent in the system from which they were collected, 3.The agency responsible for collection of the fees in systems managed by IMD/ID is the government agent (GA) of each district. He uses field officers of the Land Commissioner's Department such as colonization officers and field instructors to do the actual collecting, Collection of O&M fees is based on a Specification Register for each imgation system, prepared under supervision of the GA. It gives the name of the legal allottees and tenant cultivators, extent of their paddy holding in the system, their location, and other relevant particulars. This register is intended to include all irrigation beneficiaries, including settlers in pumm villages and regularized encroachers. Unregularized encroachers pay a fine of Rs 125/acre/year. It is unlikely that any of the Specification Registers are accurate and up-to-date. Instructions were issued to update them. These funds are not credited to the government consolidated fund, but are reserved for the major irrigation system from which they are collected. Allocations are made annually by the Ministry of Lands and Land Development through the IMD for regular O&M to be decided upon at the system level in consultation with farmers and farmer organizations.In Mahaweli systems, the unit manager under the supervision of the block manager and resident project managerThe authors conclude that MEA has achieved a higher rate of collection because only one collects the fees' . organization is involved. In IMDIID systems collection efficiency depends on coordination of different field officers from different departments.The GA is empowered to file cases against farmers who do not pay and to recover the fee as if it were an outstanding loan owed to the government. He may also deduct the unpaid fee from payments made by government to a farmer for sale of produce or other purpose. In the case of cultivators of private land, the GA may seize and auction property to recover outstanding fees.The study lists problems associated with collecting O&M fees including: 1.Farmers do not understand the purpose of the fee Specification registers are not up-todate. Not all beneficiaries are charged the fee 3.Farmers are charged for incorrect areas Some farmers get water, if at all, only in maha. They should not have to pay the same rate as those who get water for two seasons.The fee is not waived in case of crop failure. The ministry maintains that farmers can insure their crop.Maintenance cost is less than Rs 200/acre in some systems.Perera, the first Director of the Irrigation Management Division, in a paper describing the INMAS program (1986) outlines the functions of IMD, the Project Manager, the sub-committee of the District Agriculture Committee, the Project Committee, the Farmer Organizations, and the Farmer Representatives. All of these play a role in the mobilization and allocation of resources for system O&M.Perera points out several changes that have been made in the policy since its initial implementation. A decision was taken to limit the fee to Rs 100/acre for farmers cultivating two seasons per year and Rs 60/ acre for those cultivating only one season. To allow farmers to get used lo the idea of contributing to the O&M fund, it was decided to suspend for the present the decision to increase the fee each year by Rs 20. Also it was decided to limit the collection of O&M fee to systems with more than 200 hectares. Systems smaller than that were considered too small to warrant the effort in collections. In these systems, farmers are encouraged to maintain the distribution network themselves with assistance from the Irrigation Department.He presents data on collections compared to assessments in the years 1984, 1985, and 1986. The proportion collected has declined drastically according to these data. However, since it is not clear when collections were mademoney collected in 1985 and 1986 may have been credited to 1984 collections if it was the first time a farmer paid -it is not possible to'tell whether the amount collected in a given year has actually decreased as drastically as it appears.Gunesekera (11985) reports that although farmers were accustomed to receiving irrigation free of charge with no responsibilities for maintenance of systems, the early experience was that after proper explanation of the importance of the payment and the program, the farmers did not disagree with it. He reports that the following contribute to fanners' resistance to pay:-32 Pmpagnnda ngntnst recovery. Some groups have actively campaigned against payment. This had been a political issue in the recent past and collection efforts had been half-hearted.Luck c$ confidena m o@m. A few corrupt and irresponsible officers have caused farmers to mistrust government Officials.Fahrt to 6 adion against df$uftm. Lack of action against defaulters in the past made farmers think they could get away with not paying. But according to Gunesekera they will be prosecuted under Section 78A of the Irrigation Ordinance in future.Historical studies show that the government in Sri Lanka has always provided a legal basis for charging fanners for irrigation services. During the British pencd there was a policy that beneficiaries pay for irrigation services, including the capital cost at a subsidized rate. At least for part of the period, the Irrigation Department was intended to be a revenue earning department, and it was argued that this greatly inhibited the development of irrigation. At the same time there was a concern that considerably less than the $11 amount that was due was actually being collected from farmers.Since Independence, the irrigation ordinance has always provided for charging farmers a water rate, but collection has not been vigorously promoted. The issue of irrigation rates has been and remains a political issue, and at times the government has followed a policy of not attempting to charge farmers for irrigation services.With the implementation of the O&M fee in 1984, the government appeared determined to make up for the shortfall in resources for irrigation O&M through gradually transferring the burden of the full cost of O&M to the beneficiaries. The Silva (1986) study on implementation of the O&M charge was completed the s , a m year in which the O&M fee was first imposed. There is, thus, limited information on the actual experience of collecting fees, managing the funds collected, and allocating and spending them.Research into these aspects of resource mobilization now that there have been several more years of experience is needed to understand better both the process and the performance of mobilizing resources for O&M of major systems. Have the amounts paid actually been spent in the system from which they were collecp3? How are decisions about allocating the maintenance budget made? How much do farmers participate in these decisions? Have farmer organizations been able to take maintenance contracts? What is the relationship between the development of effective farmer organizations and the rate of resource mobilization from fanners? What is the sanction process for farmers who do not pay their O&M fee? Is it effective? Karunanayake (1982) advocates the constitution of special Water Courts to adjudicate irrigation violations including failure to pay irrigation fees. He maintains the normal judicial process is too cumbersome to settle cases, and authorities are reluctant to prosecute violators.Silva (1986) concluded that MEA achieved higher collection rates because of its unitary management structure. A comparative study of policies and procedures in MEA and IMD may be useful. Has MEA continued to achieve these higb rates? Are there differences in incentives for those responsible to collect fees to do so? Are there differences in Earmen' incentives to pay? The Department of Agrarian Services is responsible for systems up to 80 ha and the Irrigation Department and IMD for larger systems. However, a decision was taken not to collect fees from farmers in Irrigation Department systems of less than 200 hectares. The farmers in those systems are encouraged to maintain them under the supervision of the Irrigation Department. They may be left to their own resources, and the farmers have likely either developed means of maintaining them or they are deteriorating badly. Little research has been done on the O&M of these medium-scale systems.The issue of wholesaling water at the turn-out or distributary canal level as suggested by Karunanayake should be investigated, Is it feasible? What technological and institutional improvements would be required to implement such a scheme?IThis finding is in contrast with the pre-rehabilitation situation at Gal Oya, where greater inequalities were reported along the main canals and distributaries (Wijayaratne 1986b). The difference may relate to the fact that Kaudulla is a water-surplus system, while Gal Oya is water-short.*The focus of this review and the ISM project is primarily on mobilizing resources for system O&M with less concern for the mechanisms for financing initial construction. southern Dry Zone, the differences, even though small, may have significant effects on the water requirement of crops in the latter; particularly because the Kirindi Oya project extends into the southern semi-arid zone (DL5').The Dry Zone has an undulating landscape with a definite ridge and valley pattern. The northern Dry Zone (DL1) has relatively low ridges and broad flat valleys while the southern Dry Zone, due to differences in erosion, shows a less mature landscape with less broad valleys. In such a landscape the topographical position of the soils determine their hydrology, hence the cropping pattern, management, and irrigation regimes. (1967,1978) and Somasiri (1981). For the Kirindi Oya area, detailed reconnaissance and semi-detailed soil surveys and land classification studies carried out by the Land Use Division of the Irrigation Department provide essential information for irrigated agricultural development. The soil survey and land classification reports are available at the Land Use Division, Irrigation Dcpartment.The current major objectives for crop diversification are to:Select and match crops for different topographical band classes to optimize water use efficiency and economic returns to farmers: 2.Prevent over-production of rice. considering that self-sufficiency in rice has almost been achieved; and.Grow non-rice crops during the dry season (yala) when stored water in reservoirs is inadequate for rice cultivation Three aspects of crop diversification require special attention: 1) the place of rice cultivation in the,dry zone, 2) crop selection and potential returns. and 3) land preparation and on-farm water management.llploiid I Country(ies): • Timor-Leste Outcome Impact Case Report: Description of Stage reached: National level uptake of the innovation by the government of Timor-Leste in May 2019 as their official fisheries monitoring system. 359 solar-powered tracking devices were installed on fishing boats in Timor-Leste.\" plan to install 500 in 2020. Name of lead organization/entity to take innovation to this stage: WorldFish -WorldFish Names of top five contributing organizations/entities to this stage: • Wilderlab • PDS -Pelagic Data Systems Milestones: • 3.1.4. Successful piloting of five Inspire grantees in Africa and South Asia, and up to four new pilot Inspire projects around Big Data related innovations assigned.","tokenCount":"174"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/2122810955.json b/data/part_2/2122810955.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..013547172afa039d9eb60f7c10159dfba9ba79ce --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/2122810955.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ee7ff294e53d66f909d46d6efd9b82ec","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/bd2fee19-2801-4887-915d-8ec00bf94622/retrieve","id":"-301514517"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"4c59f72f-13a3-41d0-bf20-c108f8a711d6","pagecount":"123","content":"The European Forest Genetic Resources Programme (EUFORGEN) is a collaborative programme among European countries aimed at ensuring the effective conservation and the sustainable utilization of forest genetic resources in Europe. It was established to implement Resolution 2 of the Strasbourg Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe. EUFORGEN is financed by participating countries and is coordinated by IPGRI, in collaboration with the Forestry Department of FAO. It facilitates the dissemination of information and various collaborative initiatives. The Programme operates through networks in which forest geneticists and other forestry specialists work together to analyze needs, exchange experiences and develop conservation objectives and methods for selected species. The networks also contribute to the development of appropriate conservation strategies for the ecosystems to which these species belong. Network members and other scientists and forest managers from participating countries carry out an agreed workplan with their own resources as inputs in kind to the Programme. EUFORGEN is overseen by a Steering Committee composed of National Coordinators nominated by the participating countries.The geographical designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IPGRI or the CGIAR concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Similarly, the views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of these participating organizations.Four years after the establishment of the European Forest Genetic Resources Programme (EUFORGEN), the second Steering Committee meeting was held from 26 -29 November 1998, in Vienna, Austria. National Coordinators from 23 participating countries (Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Malta, Moldova, Norway, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and Ukraine) attended the meeting, as well as national focal persons from 11 non-participating countries and 12 resource persons and observers. The four additional countries participating in EUFORGEN (Latvia, Luxembourg, Monaco and Switzerland) were unable to attend.The main objective of the Steering Committee meeting was to review the progress made since the establishment of the Programme in November 1994 and to outline future activities. EUFORGEN was developed as the implementation mechanism of Strasbourg Resolution S2 (Conservation of forest genetic resources) adopted at the first Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe.The meeting was opened by Mr Rudolf Themessl, Ministerialrat, Forestry Department, Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. He welcomed the participants and expressed the continuous support of Austria to international collaboration on the conservation of forest genetic resources in Europe. He wished the participants a successful meeting.In his introductory remarks, Dr Geoffrey Hawtin, Director General of the International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI) said that the conservation and sustainable use of forest genetic resources was a subject of global concern. The networking initiative of European countries gave substance to the implementation of Strasbourg Resolution S2, was essential for increasing the scientific knowledge in this area, and stimulated cooperation between national programmes in Europe and other regions. Ms Christel Palmberg-Lerche, Chief, Forest Resources Development Service, Forestry Department, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) also addressed the meeting. She underlined the importance of developing a coherent, country-driven global framework for the conservation, management, sustainable use and enhancement of forest genetic resources.The first day of the meeting consisted of two technical sessions. Ten papers were presented and discussed. The first two papers focused on the history and role of genetic resources issues as they have been addressed in the process of Ministerial Conferences on the Protection of Forests in Europe. The following four papers reviewed the trends and developments in conserving, monitoring and enhancing genetic diversity of forests in Europe. The last four papers complemented these contributions by referring to the examples of collaborative activities undertaken in the Trans-Caucasus, Central Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and North America and examined their links with the networking in Europe.The papers offered a broad overview of the current developments in the area of forest genetic resources and provided a basis for the further discussions specifically related to the role, orientation and management of the EUFORGEN Programme in the future. The workshop papers are published in this volume.Dr Jozef Turok presented a comprehensive report covering the first four years of the EUFORGEN activities (Annex I and II). A total of 27 countries joined the Programme during the period from November 1994 to November 1998. Five Networks have been established, and a total of 18 Network meetings were organized. There has been a generally increasing number of participants (attending members) in the Networks.The Steering Committee acknowledged the substantial output from the Networks as well as the role of the Secretariat in achieving these results. The EUFORGEN activities are financed through contributions from participating countries. Concern was raised with regard to delayed payments from some of the countries. The EUFORGEN Coordinator informed that the budget and accounts are regularly audited as part of IPGRI's external auditing procedures.Collaborative linkages developed between EUFORGEN and other regions, with particular reference to the newly independent states of the former Soviet Union, as well as other international organizations, were noted.It was stressed that EUFORGEN should follow closely and participate in the current discussions concerning the development of Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management, particularly with regard to the genetic components of biological diversity.Brief statements were then presented describing the five EUFORGEN Networks:• Populus nigra Network (François Lefèvre, Chair)• Noble Hardwoods Network (Gösta Eriksson, Chair)• Picea abies Network (Veikko Koski, Chair)• Quercus suber Network (Maria Carolina Varela, Chair)• Social Broadleaves Network (Ladislav Paule, Vice-Chair).These contributions (Annex III) circulated to members of the Steering Committee before the meeting, provided a synthesis of the Networks' activities, including their evolution, potential and perspectives for the future as well as linkages between the individual Networks. Mechanisms to encourage further interaction and information flow between the Networks need to be explored.Collaboration with IUFRO Working Groups was emphasized.Themes of common interest to all the Networks were mentioned, e.g. population genetic concepts, role of tree breeding in genetic conservation, global climate change, conservation of associated species in ecosystems, species hybridization. The need for exchanging information and coordinating approach to address these issues in general was expressed. One item of particular interest to some present was the development of a glossary of terms and definitions relating to forest genetic resources (FGR).The afternoon of the second day of the meeting was devoted to a detailed consideration of the Coordinator's report on EUFORGEN during Phase I. Following discussion, participating countries unanimously approved the report. All countries and organizations present took part in the discussion of the report, which focused on the aspects presented below, in which the combined responses of participating countries (23 present), non-participating countries (11 focal persons present) and international organizations, initiatives and programmes (5 observers present) are summarized.Non-participating countries expressed their gratitude to EUFORGEN for providing the opportunity to attend not only this Steering Committee meeting but also to participate in Network meetings and activities and in particular for the partial financial support they had received for these purposes.It was felt that much had been achieved and that the objectives of the Resolution had been clearly followed. The specific expectations of a number of countries had been met. EUFORGEN was recognized to have developed a good reputation in the short period of time it has been in operation.The influence of EUFORGEN was felt to have already had a major effect in some countries and many anticipated positive steps in the implementation of national FGR programmes in the near future. The participation of national governments in EUFORGEN had a positive influence on the focusing of attention on the importance of the conservation of FGR. It was felt that in a number of instances much less would have been achieved without the structure of EUFORGEN to support it. The effects had included the release of increased funding for conservation of FGR, the acceptance of such conservation as an integral part of sustainable forest management and the consolidation of genetic conservation principles into recent forest law.National Coordinators are commonly not drawn from those organizations or sectors of government, which have the responsibility of paying for EUFORGEN membership. This applies to those who have not yet joined as well as to already participating countries. Both groups saw the need to relate activities and outputs to S2 objectives as important ways of convincing the respective funding (implementing) agencies that membership involves value for money. This is particularly true for countries that have high contributions. The importance of monitoring and documenting progress in FGR conservation resulting from EUFORGEN activities to national governments needs to be stressed.Networks were recognized as an effective mechanism for coordinating the implementation of S2 objectives. Their main activities have been exchange of data and information, dissemination of knowledge, development of strategies and technical guidelines, common minimum information standards, databases, preparation of joint project proposals, exchange of genetic material and the initiation of joint field trials. Although some participants felt that Networks should remain restricted to their original species, there was stronger support for their extension into wider species groups. An interest in joint meetings was also expressed. Concern over increase in the size of Networks was recognized. A joint \"Inter-Network Group\" consisting of Chairs and Vice-Chairs of all Networks together with two Management Committee members was proposed and discussed. This group, rather than the Steering Committee, will have the responsibility of harmonizing the direction and activities of the Networks.There was commendation of the quality of publications that were felt to be appropriate and well produced. However, it was recognized that they served a more specialist audience such as Steering Committee and Network members or their scientific colleagues. Some members considered publications appeared too slowly after meetings. Two areas in particular were felt to warrant more attention. Firstly, executive summaries of larger publications in generally more lay terms would be useful for policy-makers and nonscientific levels of government. Secondly, this material and other more specific information would also be useful to be produced in further languages. The production of technical guidelines for the management of forest genetic resources by each of the Networks was seen as a key output of the Programme.In specific cases, Networks have been effective fora in developing proposals for external funding of cooperative projects among a number of countries. EUFORGEN has the potential to enhance greater collaboration between European Union countries and non-EU members mainly from eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. It was also recognized that EUFORGEN had played a major role as an example for similar genetic resources initiatives in other regions of the world and that it could continue to do so in areas where such work has not yet been developed.Raising awareness about the importance of forest genetic resources in the pan-European process on forests and at other political fora was confirmed to be one of the objectives of EUFORGEN. It was felt that EUFORGEN was well equipped to take on the task of promoting better awareness, particularly among decision-makers and forest managers in European countries. It was recognized that there was a specific need to provide better understanding of the effects of using the product of tree breeding and improvement in relation to genetic conservation principles and to try to bridge the gap between forest managers and environmentalists in the same subject area.There was some discussion of training needs with a firm interest shown by a number of countries in the prospects of training courses at general, species and national levels. There were problems in budgeting for such work; a decision was made on this topic when Phase II was discussed (see below).One of the main challenges that will face EUFORGEN in the future will be the implementation of the technical guidelines developed by the Networks. Several participants expressed concerns about how this implementation will take place at national level.The EUFORGEN Coordinator presented results of the survey on the status of the conservation and management of FGR in Europe, which was conducted prior to the meeting (September-October 1998). It was divided into three parts (conservation of genetic resources in the forestry practice, coordination at national level and international coordination). Response was received from 37 countries. The European Forest Genetic Resources Workshop held in November 1995 in Sopron, Hungary had, among others, recommended that each country develop a national strategy for the conservation of FGR. One of the objectives of the survey (part II) was to assess how that recommendation was being implemented in the participating countries. While considerable differences were evident among countries, all reported some advances ranging from the development, and in some cases, implementation, of comprehensive national forest genetic resources programmes, to initial steps taken towards this goal. Major challenges for the national strategies/programmes were to ensure that genetic considerations be integrated into national forestry policies and practices, to involve all relevant stakeholders and achieve efficient coordination among their activities.While recognizing that the present survey was the first of its kind and that no previous baseline data with which to compare the results therefore existed, the Steering Committee requested that the Secretariat extract highlights from the survey and from other available sources and, based on quantifiable data, provides a summary of the progress made for the attention of Committee members and for decision-makers in EUFORGEN countries. The Committee further recommended that the Secretariat regularly monitor progress in important criteria (e.g. establishment of a formal national programme, commitment, coordination, links, impact) against the baseline data, paying due attention to varying initial levels of development in the national forest genetic resources strategies/programmes. Several members stressed that, in addition to its technical and scientific value, such factual analysis of progress was likely to also strengthen or motivate the necessary political commitment of signatory governments of Resolution S2 to forest genetic resources.The third part of the survey focused on international collaboration, including a question about the effectiveness of EUFORGEN in contributing to the conservation and management of forest genetic resources in Europe. It was noted that countries, in general, had rated highest those activities that had been originally specified in its programme, i.e. the objectives of Resolution S2. Results of the survey also indicated areas in which EUFORGEN might become involved in the future. Providing a regional forum for the exchange of experience, knowledge and information; planning and implementation of joint Network tasks; and thus encouraging countries to ensure the conservation and sustainable use of their FGR received the highest rating.There was unanimous support for a second Phase of EUFORGEN. The increasing number of participating countries during Phase I, the technical outputs provided and their impact as well as the need for further coordinating and promoting the gene conservation efforts made by European countries provide strong justification for the continuation of EUFORGEN. A new Letter of Agreement for the Phase II will need to be formally approved by governments. This will cover the period from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2004. Some participants mentioned that there might be difficulties with seeking formal approval for a new agreement, especially if the existing one (Phase I) was made only recently. It was recommended that the Secretariat prepares and submits the new Letter of Agreement well in advance of time during 1999 (last year of Phase I), in order to allow the necessary procedure at the national level. The accompanying correspondence should make it clear that the second Phase is an expected extension of the existing Programme, and not a new mechanism.It was agreed widely that EUFORGEN should concentrate all efforts on implementing the original objectives stated in Strasbourg Resolution S2, refer to them and avoid expanding work into new areas which are not directly associated. The objectives of Resolution S2 were discussed at length. It was noted that there has been a clear distinction regarding the commitment made by signing S2 between national responsibilities and the international implementation.While EUFORGEN is directly responsible for implementing the international collaboration aspects of Resolution S2 (see Annex IV), it is recognized that decisions on forest genetic resources, their management and financing are entirely under the responsibility of the national programmes. EUFORGEN assists countries to develop and implement effective national strategies/programmes.The Steering Committee requested the Secretariat to compile an overview of the outputs provided during the past 4 years against the operational objectives of EUFORGEN (expectations based on S2). This would help to illustrate the progress made at both national level and internationally. Such overview would also clearly present the needs for continuation and lay down the concrete operational objectives for Phase II. It is important to have a baseline because different countries are in different stages of developing their national programmes on forest genetic resources (see above section). It was recommended that a report on what was achieved in the implementation of S2 by countries (at the national level) and by the EUFORGEN Secretariat (at the international level) be prepared for each Steering Committee meeting.It is described in the \"EUFORGEN Document\" which forms part of the Letter of Agreement and is regularly reviewed at Steering Committee meetings (Annex IV). It was discussed on the basis of the proposal prepared by the Secretariat and sent to members of the Steering Committee in advance before the meeting. The recommendations resulting from this discussion are incorporated in the version endorsed (Annex IV). Some members raised their concern over relatively little time devoted to this item at the meeting.The main level and tool for implementing the objectives of EUFORGEN remain to be the species Networks. The Steering Committee stressed that this was a practically oriented, well-established approach. The participants were reminded that the species chosen for the individual Networks were \"pilot\", i.e. representing different gene conservation problems and situations and hence not based on criteria such as the level of threats to individual species. The broadening of the scope of the Networks with regard to species should be driven from within the Networks, under the overall guidance by the Inter-Network Group. It was noted that Networks already made first steps towards broadening their species scope: Quercus suber Network and Mediterranean oaks, Populus nigra Network and P. alba, Picea abies Network and other conifers. The Steering Committee expressed satisfaction with these developments. Some participants raised concerns about the increased size of meetings associated with the broader scope of Networks involving more countries. The mechanism adopted in the EUFORGEN Document was considered adequate to ensure a good balance. A survey will be conducted before the next Steering Committee meeting in order to re-assess the priorities given by countries to species that have, or have not been covered by the EUFORGEN Networks.While it was agreed that synergies should be created between all the EUFORGEN Networks in addressing certain themes (such as genetic resources in view of the global climate change, common methodologies), thematically-oriented Networks should not be developed. The Steering Committee recommended to further incorporating the most pertinent themes into the context of ongoing activities of the Networks. This arrangement takes into consideration the fact that the five Networks are differently advanced and may work with different intensity. The Inter-Network Group will also be responsible for harmonizing thematic priorities and action among the Networks. The Steering Committee encouraged that occasional joint Network meetings (two or more Networks) are organized, according to the needs and operational possibilities.The Steering Committee requested that each Network provide a brief overview of its objectives, workplan with milestones and outputs. These will enable to indicate progress, separately for Phase I and expected for Phase II (especially the three Networks with changing scope).It was agreed that Chair of a Network is to be elected for a period between 3 (minimum) to 5 (maximum) years, depending on the frequency of meetings. A new Chair and a new Vice-Chair are not to be elected at the same time so as to avoid any disruption in the Network's leadership.It was suggested that the possibilities of electronic media (particularly Internet) be further explored to improve the communication and exchange of information by the Networks.The motivated involvement and various inputs in kind by a large number of Network members in fulfilling the tasks of the workplans were acknowledged by the Steering Committee.The possibility for developing \"complementary modules\" was proposed to the Steering Committee by the Secretariat with the intention to mobilize additional resources in support of the tasks of the workplans in individual Networks, organize training etc. First option foresaw that funding for these activities are raised independently from the annual financial contributions of participating countries and on a voluntary basis. Second option foresaw funding of the modules from increased annual contributions. While some countries confirmed that additional resources for increased contributions might be available for Phase II, it was decided not to change the present mode of operation and not to introduce complementary modules into the structure of EUFORGEN.The annual budget and contributions for Phase II as given in EUFORGEN Document were endorsed by the Steering Committee (Annex IV).The revised EUFORGEN Document was circulated. It was discussed and endorsed by members of the Steering Committee with modifications (see Annex IV).Dr Thomas Geburek, Austria's National Coordinator, chairing the final session, thanked all participants for their work and all the inputs during the meeting. Dr Geoffrey Hawtin expressed his wish to see the collaborative work on forest genetic resources in Europe continued and further strengthened.The Steering Committee thanked the host and the organizers for their arrangements of the meeting.Ten years ago, in 1989, we started to be aware of the major threats affecting forests and forest biodiversity: acid rain, uncontrolled forest genetic erosion, forest fires, decline of mountain forests, lack of research and scientific knowledge about forest tree physiology and forest ecosystems. But at the same time, European countries realized that they could share their experience regarding all these problems, with the common will to solve them, and the opportunities of using similar analyses and common strategies to reach this aim. Owing to these reasons, Finland and France agreed to convene a Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe in Strasbourg in December 1990. It was the beginning of a long and innovative process; but at first there were countries and people who were sceptical about its chances of success.Nevertheless, it was the first time that the need to protect European forests was recognized at the ministerial level. Ministers responsible for forests committed themselves to technical and scientific cooperation, through a clear programme that could be periodically evaluated.This programme focused on a limited number of actions, scientifically relevant and politically attractive, illustrated by six different resolutions, with a follow-up process:• This resolution dealt with the conservation of forest genetic resources and contained three parts:The Signatory States and international institutions \"commit themselves to implement in their own countries, using whatever methods seem most appropriate, a policy for the conservation of forest genetic resources.\"The principles • Immediate actions without waiting for all the scientific answers • Simple, stable and long-lasting methods • Conservation of the total genotypic variability (between species, races and individuals)• In situ conservation emphasized and integrated in the field of forest management, combined when necessary with ex situ conservation • Preserving also forest ecosystems and rare forest species• Practical recommendations on the silviculture practice in each country • Adequate financial support to the national programmes dealing with conservation of forest genetic resources.During the two pre-conferences in Geneva, the national delegates agreed on the need for a functional but voluntary instrument of international cooperation, from the existing relevant organizations \"to promote and coordinate:• in situ and ex situ methods to conserve the genetic diversity of European forests • exchanges of reproductive materials • monitoring of progress in these fields.\"The way followed since the Strasbourg Conference (1990) The Ministerial Conference of Strasbourg adopted six basic resolutions to protect the forests in Europe. At this stage, the commitments were general and needed complementary thoughts to become operational.Regarding Resolution 2 and the conservation of forest genetic resources in Europe, this work was conducted by the Follow-up Committee composed of four members: M. Arbez (France), Chair, V. Koski (Finland), Co-Chair, M.C. Varela (Portugal) and J. Matras (Poland). The Committee met three times (Warsaw 1991, Rome 1992and Brussels 1993).It was assisted in its mission by several personalities from the Forestry Department of FAO (C. Palmberg, O. Souvannavong), IBPGR (E. Frison) and the European Commission (F. Kremer, DG VI). This group also received help and advice from scientists (H. Muhs, G. Eriksson). To clarify the actual situation of forest genetic resources in Europe, to identify the most threatened resources and the nature of their threats, a questionnaire was prepared and sent to all national coordinators of the 31 signatory countries of Resolution S2.The analysis of the corresponding results and their use for further recommendations benefited from technical and financial support from the Forestry Department of FAO and from the Commission of the European Union (DG VI). The work was performed by the group, first between December 1990 (Strasbourg Conference) and June 1993 (Helsinki Conference) using two pre-conferences in Geneva and a general meeting of the Follow-up Committee in Lisbon.The analysis of the results from the Resolution S2 questionnaire was presented to the national coordinators attending the second pre-conference of Geneva. According to the information obtained, some important forest species appeared to be threatened in some countries at the population level, which required urgent measures to be taken for their preservation. The species most frequently mentioned were: Ulmus sp., Picea abies, Abies nebrodensis and Abies alba, several noble hardwoods especially the wild fruit trees Rosaceae, Populus nigra, Quercus sp., Pinus nigra, Pinus sylvestris and Taxus baccata.From this survey, it appeared that: • human activities are most often responsible for the threats to forest genetic resources • national programmes specifically aimed at medium and long-term conservation were scarce and often very recent (Finland, Sweden, Germany, France, etc.) • most of the forest stands declared as in situ genetic reserves were combining conservation and other objectives (performance evaluation, wood production, seed production)• most of the signatory countries of the Resolution S2 also declared their will to cooperate in a European programme focusing on forest genetic resources conservation. Keeping in mind the principle according to which every country is responsible for its own forest genetic resources, the added value of a European collaborative programme would be mainly networking among national programmes, common passport data, databases, and creation of optimal conditions for a continuous progress in forest gene conservation methods.To cover most of the scientific and operational problems to be solved at the level of the national \"species-oriented gene conservation networks\", the idea was to choose a very limited number of species, representative of the different geographic, biological and genetic situations. With such an approach, and taking into account the information obtained and the national priorities identified through the analysis of the questionnaire, four case study or 'pilot' species (including one group of species: Norway spruce, cork oak, black poplar and Noble Hardwoods) were then proposed. The national delegates participating in the second Geneva pre-conference accepted this proposal, which was consequently endorsed by the Second Ministerial Conference in Helsinki, in June 1993.• Norway spruce (Picea abies) has a large distribution in northern and central Europe. It occurs in dense forest stands, at low elevation in the North and high elevation in the South (Alpine and Carpathian ranges). It is a monoecious, wind-pollinated conifer, often represented in large and continuous forests. With regard to the large area covered, this is a major species for its ecological and economical importance. Severe decline due to acid rains has occurred in central Europe, and genetic conservation measures must be undertaken urgently. On the other hand, severe damages due to global warning could be expected in boreal areas and marginal high elevation populations of the alpine zone. Old international provenance experiments exist (established in 1938 and 1968). Results from old progeny tests are also available in various countries, providing interesting data on which to base the conservation strategy.• Cork oak (Quercus suber) has a typically western Mediterranean distribution. The economic importance of the species is great in some areas (Sardinia, southern Spain and Portugal, northwestern Morocco). This species is presently endangered by a complex decline, extended to most of these areas. This is also a monoecious wind-pollinated species, with heavy seeds closely dispersed around the mother trees (when not planted). Only limited data are available about the structure of the genetic diversity in this species, and urgent conservation measures are needed. The advanced genetic studies performed on Quercus petraea would provide a useful model. New opportunities for close links could be developed with the recently established Social Broadleaves Network (European beech and oaks).• Black poplar (Populus nigra) is an original model species with linear repartition along rivers; it is dioecious with wind pollination. Black poplar is a pioneer species, expected to be a good case study for the metapopulation genetic model. Local populations are often threatened in their natural habitat by riverside management; they are pollinated by the closely located cultivated and genetically related Euramerican hybrids. From the economic aspect, Populus nigra populations provide a gene source to improve disease resistances and to create new hybrids. Populus nigra could be a good model to develop dynamic ex situ conservation strategies.• Noble Hardwoods: numerous species with valuable timber used mostly for furniture are often known under this common name. Among them, the wild forest fruit trees from the family Rosaceae are the most homogeneous group regarding biological and genetic characteristics. The species belonging to the Prunus, Sorbus, Malus and Pyrus genera are all characterized by scattered spatial distribution and insect-pollination. Fruits are eaten and spatially dispersed by small mammals or birds. These tree species, often threatened by a recent evolution of the silvicultural practices (even-aged monospecific forests) are particularly important to maintain a sufficient level of biodiversity within the temperate forest ecosystems. These four pilot forest gene conservation Networks proposed initially were established and developed within the EUFORGEN Programme. A fifth Network, concerning Social Broadleaves was created some years later (1997).The Second Ministerial Conference in Helsinki endorsed the proposals prepared by the Follow-up Committee of Resolution S2, and endorsed the EUFORGEN project presented by IBPGR (International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, now IPGRI) and the Forestry Department of FAO. This project was prepared and presented by E. Frison (IPGRI) and C. Palmberg (FAO), then developed with success by J. Turok at IPGRI since 1995.This short travel back to the initial Strasbourg Resolution S2 helps us to measure the progress achieved during eight years. Thanks to IPGRI and FAO, EUFORGEN became the efficient tool for international cooperation in the field of conservation of forest genetic resources in Europe. We must continue in the same direction for the coming years.But beside this impressive work at the international level (motivating and strengthening national programmes, encouraging collaboration between countries, improving strategies and methods, providing scientific information) we must not forget that the most important job remains the conservation of genetic diversity itself, to be done within and by each country.To 'conserve' the full efficiency of EUFORGEN, the programme should not be requested to focus on too many new species of interest. The pilot species were chosen to represent as many biological and genetic situations as possible. Thanks to the work already achieved within each Network, significant progress has been made with regard to this aim.We should probably identify general themes of common interest for the different Networks and hold joint meetings between the Networks. The species groups could then be concentrated on specific themes most relevant for each group alone.The work undertaken with the minor or economically less important species seems to me particularly relevant, with special mention of the Noble Hardwoods.We have numerous subjects to explore together, both from the scientific and practical perspectives:• Establishment in each country of a safe system to ascertain the regeneration and the continuity of our gene resources and tree seed banks • Initiation of national research projects to predict the impact of global change on the evolution of the forest cover and its genetic composition and structure, and to predict the effects of silvicultural practices on the genetic diversity in the production forests, as well as in the gene conservation units • This will be achieved thanks to increased linkages between genetics (population genetics, marker genes) and ecosystem studies.Rather than accepting without scientific proofs that strict protection and natural regeneration only are always the best tools for genetic conservation, let us think about new scientific approaches and experimental designs; let us think dynamic conservation, integrated in production forests, with relevant consideration of the possible silvicultural practices, the parallel tree breeding programmes and the possible impact of national and international rules for collecting, trade, and use of forest genetic materials.Beside genetic conservation methods proper, first applied to forest gene reserve management, to be efficient we also need to integrate these methods in our regular activities within the forest and wood production context. In our old continent, the forests are essentially cultivated and most of them are small forests, privately owned: such an important social aspect needs to be integrated into our communication strategy.Private forest owner associations as well as national forest services must be considered to improve professional awareness about forest genetic resources conservation and management.Finally, EUFORGEN was and remains an excellent tool to cooperate and to transfer operational and scientific information towards non-EU countries, especially those in eastern Europe and in the Mediterranean basin. This is also its mission and a challenge for the future.Environmental issues have attracted increasing interest throughout the world, largely as a result of serious concern that the Earth's biological system is of fundamental importance to humankind. The augmenting public awareness has finally resulted in several international legally-binding instruments, such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats.In the forestry sector, strategies for biodiversity conservation to slow down the loss of biodiversity and to enhance its contribution to a further development should embrace (1) the preservation of biodiversity, (2) the sustainable use, and (3) the equitable sharing of benefits. In Europe, these objectives should be attained through the implementation of politicallybinding resolutions (soft laws) adopted at three Ministerial Conferences on the Protection of Forests in Europe. These agreements have been known as the Strasbourg, Helsinki and Lisbon Resolutions according to the location where the respective Ministerial Conference was held.Biodiversity has been given high attention in this pan-European process (Lust 1995, Turok 1997, Geburek 1998). Thus starting with the First Ministerial Conference in Strasbourg (Anonymous 1990), the conservation of forest genetic resources has been explicitly mentioned in Resolution S2. Specific actions such as (1) in situ and ex situ measures, (2) the exchange of genetic material, and (3) regular assessment of progress should strengthen the conservation of biodiversity at the genetic level. Technically, the S2 Follow-up Process on European level has mainly been implemented via the European Forest Genetic Resources Programme (EUFORGEN) and its network activities (see Turok 1997). The Second and Third Ministerial Conferences in Helsinki and Lisbon have also tackled the problem of forest biodiversity conservation (Anonymous 1993a(Anonymous ,b, 1996a(Anonymous , 1998a,b),b).Decision-makers have realized that forest genetics play an important role when sustainability of forests in Europe is at stake, and forestry policy and science deal increasingly with biodiversity related issues (e.g. Glück 1984Glück , 1998)). This becomes lucid because sustainable use of forests is impossible unless forest genetic resources are sufficiently regarded and several Resolutions directly address issues related to forest genetics. The objective of this paper is to point out these aspects of the Resolutions agreed upon during the last two Ministerial Conferences on the Protection of Forests in Europe.The role of the Conference was twofold: (i) it was a forum for the assessment of the Followup Process of its predecessor; (ii) it was an opportunity to consider the implementation of the H1, H2 and H3 were signed by 37 European countries and the EC, while H4 was not signed by France and Sweden. Albania, Macedonia FYR and Moldova did not sign the resolutions. All the Helsinki Resolutions are relevant from a genetic point of view. Although terms like 'genetic diversity' or 'genetic resources' are rarely used as such, it has to be pointed out that whenever the term 'biodiversity' is used in the official documents this term also refers to genetic diversity. This is particularly so because the Ministerial Conference adopted the definition of the term 'biodiversity' as provided in the Convention on Biological Diversity. The term thus comprises genetic and interspecific diversity as well as the variability of ecosystems. \"Biological Diversi ty m eans the var iability among living organi sms from al l sou rces including, inter al ia, terrestrial, marine and oth er a quatic ec osystems and the ecological complexes of which they are part; this includes diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems.\" (...) (Anonymous 1993b: p. 26) Unfortunately, 'biodiversity' is frequently interpreted as diversity of species. In order to further clarify the genetic component of biodiversity, its significance in the ecosystem function, i.e. the role of the single specimen, must first be understood. It is self-evident though rarely clearly recognized that single trees and not species act in forest ecosystems. Single trees live or die, capture energy and serve as energy supply for other individual plants or animals. Individuals (genotypes) interact with their environment (genotype-environment interactions) and/or can serve as an environmental factor for others. Ecological communities (e.g. forest vegetation types) are rarely recognized as assemblages of individuals of a single species but rather as species assemblages. Species are not monolithic, invariant or static, but are constantly changing ecological entities. Although a more individual-based ecology is slowly emerging (e.g. Rose et al. 1993), the individual (genotypic) role is still insufficiently understood. Moreover, the significance of genetic diversity is not limited within a single species, but through intraspecific and interspecific genetic adaptation it influences the emergence and functioning of higher order ecological systems.Regrettably, these evolutionary aspects -the intra-and interspecific genetic functions and processes -are not explicitly mentioned in the CBD definition of biodiversity (cf. definitions of biodiversity in UNEP (1995), chapter 2).The overall objective of this Resolution is the implementation of the non-legally-binding authoritative statement of principles for global consensus on the management of conservation and sustainable development of all types of forests (UNCED) in Europe. In a number of statements, the Signatory States and the EC pointed out that sustainable forest management has to be carried out in such a way that biodiversity is secured over the long term. The concrete requirements are as follows:• Genetic selection (...) should not favour performance traits at the expense of adaptive ones, except in particular cultures where intensive care may protect them against damage • Native species and local provenances should be preferred where appropriate. The use of species, provenances, varieties or ecotypes outside their natural range should be discouraged where their introduction would endanger important/valuable indigenous ecosystems, flora and fauna. Introduced species may be used when their potential negative impacts have been assessed and evaluated over sufficient time (...)• Whenever introduced species are used to replace local ecosystems, sufficient action should be taken at the same time to conserve native flora and fauna.It should be stressed that the implementation of these commitments at the national level is difficult in some cases. The existing Council Directive on the marketing of forest reproductive material (66/404/EEC) authorizes a Member State to prohibit the marketing of forest reproductive material only if there is reason to believe that the use has an adverse effect on forestry in all or part of the Member State (Anonymous 1966). This authorization requires a procedure, which has not been implemented so far. The problem is that the single Member State has the burden of proof and the statement on that matter is based on very limited knowledge. There are non-binding provenance recommendations for foreign tree species, for instance in Austria (e.g. Raschka 1997). However, there is no information as to which extent their growth endangers indigenous tree species or if a potential risk to the indigenous flora would be justified because of higher yield. In most cases only small-scale growth of foreign tree species will not cause a risk, or threat, to the indigenous tree species. In certain cases, however, for instance in the case of growing black poplar hybrids in a riparian forest where also Populus nigra occur, this cannot be called in accordance with the Resolution (cf. Heinze submitted). Further, it seems difficult to interpret the regulation that local provenances should be preferred to foreign provenances. From a technical viewpoint, it should be noted in this context that, contrary to the common view in forestry, local provenances do not necessarily have the highest degree of adaptedness to the respective environmental conditions (e.g. Mátyás 1991Mátyás , 1996)). This means that local provenances may be replaced by non-autochthonous material, for instance in cases where the genetic adaptedness of the future stand has to be valued higher than the conservation of the naturally occurring population. With a view to the climate change, this possibility should be critically examined.Sustainable use of forest genetic resources means the use of forest tree populations in a way and at a rate that does not lead to the long-term decline of genetic diversity, thereby maintaining its gen etic potential t o me et needs an d aspirations of pr esent and futur e generations. Th is do es not entail th at genetic d iversity ca n b e h anded o n t o futur e generations completely unchanged, since virtually all forms of forestry management lead to so me changes or l osses. However, t he long-ter m g enetic adaptability o f fo rest tre e populations must re main unaffected by the us e of for est tree populations. No ting that where there is a threat of significant r eduction or loss of ge netic div ersity, lack of full scientific certainty should not be us ed as a reason for postponing meas ures to a void or minimize such a threat (precautionary principle).Regarding forest genetics, this Resolution is clearly most comprehensive. The General Guidelines of H2 include:• The conservation and appropriate enhancement of genetic diversity should be an essential operational element in sustainable forest management, (...) in forestry policies and legislation. For instance, Austria has tried to satisfy this requirement, in connection with the forest law provisions on the transportation of forest reproductive material by the introduction of statutory minimum numbers of seed trees to be harvested and establishment of the additional category \"Increased Genetic Multiplicity\" (Anonymous 1996b,c)• The conservation and appropriate enhancement of genetic diversity should be based both on specific, practical, cost-effective and efficient biodiversity appraisal systems, and on methods for evaluating the impact on biodiversity of chosen forest development and management techniques • The conservation of genetic resources of forest species, both those currently exploited for economic purposes and those considered secondary or rare as detailed in Resolution 2 of the Strasbourg Conference, and (...) the protection of threatened forest species and ecosystems, as listed nationally or locally, in the formulation of national forest policies • The Signatory States and the European Community will establish at national or regional levels a coherent ecological network of climax, primary and other special forests aimed at maintaining or re-establishing ecosystems that are representative or threatened.Apart from national measures taken to conserve forest genetic resources and the activities within the framework of EUFORGEN, several Signatory States are currently building ecological networks of climax, primary and other special forests. These networks can also strengthen forest gene conservation. However, the objective of ecological networks is often the conservation of certain types of forest vegetation; species diversity is thus more to be to the fore. In many cases, certain forest reserves are established without sufficient consideration of genetic aspects. Selection criteria of the forest sites are the sizes of the forests stands, their numbers and distribution, statistical sampling, and other features. Species are not infrequently seen as static entities and thus reserves cannot always fulfil genetic demands. Especially small forest reserves (<5 ha) covering several species are of limited use for the conservation of intraspecific variability. The minimum size of a forest reserve is often determined pragmatically. Recently the potential use of nature reserves has been discussed thoroughly by Frank (1998), also in view of the conservation of genetic diversity.In Austria, the size of forest reserves is mainly determined in a way that all stages and phases of forest succession are continuously present (Koop 1989). Hence, this size depends on the forest vegetation type (species composition) and results, for instance, in 10 ha for linden-hornbeam mixtures or in 40 ha for certain beech-oak stands. Ecological forest networks, if not designed for genetic purposes, are of varying value. In principle, every single specimen as a carrier of genetic information is a genetic resource. However, when gene resources of forest tree populations are to be conserved, small areas are of limited value. This means that with decreasing size of the reserve the certainty and/or time scale within which the given conservation purpose can be fulfilled are diminishing. Hence, sizes of 10 to 40 ha may be appropriate for social broadleaves and most conifers when a mid-term (100 years) gene conservation purpose of that particular local population is aimed at. The above-mentioned size frame may however be inappropriate when genetic resources of scattered tree species are concerned, the time scale is prolonged, or no other supplementary action (e.g. sustainable forest management) is carried out.This Resolution is laid out in a particularly heterogeneous way, making an effort, in accordance with the Framework Convention on Climate Change of the United Nations, to contribute particularly by means of a coordinated research, to a reduction of the effects caused by the climate change. H4 comprises seven research areas:1. Linkages between climate change and forest ecosystems.2. Role of forests in the global carbon cycle.3. Studies on genetic variability of regionally important tree species in response to changes in climate and increased concentration of carbon dioxide, and on the degree and rate of evolutionary processes and adaptation, by means of genetic changes.4. Studies on the dynamic equilibrium of host-parasite relationships in new climatic environments. 5. Studies on soil formation processes, including the mineralization of organic matter and leaching, in response to climate change. 6. Development of process-based predictive ecosystem models. 7. Forest management systems to optimize adaptation to climate change.In order to identify knowledge gaps in research area 3, a small working group of forest geneticists (H.-R. Gregorius, Cs. Mátyás, J. Turok, G.G. Vendramin, Th. Geburek) was formed. This working group has elaborated the following research proposals described in greater detail by Gregorius and Geburek (1998). The research goals were to orientate themselves by the fact that ecosystem stability depends considerably on the adaptive potential of the dominant species in a system (Templeton 1995, Gregorius 1996). Because forest tree species take this key position in forest ecosystems, the investigation of their genetic potential to adapt is in the forefront. Physiological mechanisms and their genetic conditions and mechanisms therefore have to be investigated at the population level; how genetic polymorphisms and, consequently, genetic adaptive potential can be maintained over many generations is of particular importance. In the case of forest trees, adaptation processes and their essential components are still inadequately known. So far, short-term studies on the genetic structures of seed trees/sources of seed material have been carried out, comprising seeds and seedlings, provenance tests and investigations on the genetic distinction between different tree groups. These investigations have permitted interesting insights. However, the testing and/or modelling of adaptive processes to the climate change is extremely difficult.The focus was thus put on the following areas of forest genetics: 1. Evaluation of provenance tests and of studies on the reproduction, norms of reaction, glacial migration, the transfer of seed material, etc. with respect to their significance for adaptive processes. 2. Further development of genetic criteria, indicators, and verificators, including geneticdemographic properties or other surrogates, identification of genetic properties which can serve as indicators for specific evolutionary processes of adaptation. 3. Investigations on the heritability of properties relevant for adaptation. 4. Initiation and advancement of long-term experiments suited to indicate trends and directions of adaptive processes.The first two of these are of particular importance. Research area (1) provides insight into the physiological homoeostasis, which can be described by the extent of a population's phenotypic stability over different environments, whereas research area (2), by the survey of different genetic and genetic-demographic indicators, aims at the collective or genetic homoeostasis. Research area (1) thus describes the norms of reaction when rather constant genetic structures are provided, while research area (2) aims at quantifying environmentrelated changes. Four indicators with their respective verificators are proposed for evaluating whether genetic sustainability has been achieved also under the warning of climatic change. In this context, an indicator is defined as a variable which serves to examine a particular development, condition, or other facts. A verificator can be used to check if there is an indication of something, i.e. a certain variable which serves in particular to examine a certain indication. This procedure is based on a proposal worked out by the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) with substantial contribution of Canadian and Australian forest geneticists (Namkoong et al. submitted). For many detailed questions (e.g. critical limits of the verificators) no final answers are available from research yet, not even experts being of the same opinion.The approach of research area (3) is based on the fact that evolutionary processes proceed faster when the genetic component of the variance observed with an adaptation-relevant trait is high than when the environment is the main modifying factor of the trait. In this context, adaptation-related traits are defined as phenological, morphological and physiological properties enabling the population to survive over the generations, under the existing environmental conditions. Research area (4) comprises long-term experiments which, by means of surveying genetic changes over the time, leads to quantitative-genetic statements on adaptive processes.In 1998, the For the implementation of H1 and H2, a pan-European cooperation was previously initiated (Anonymous 1998b). The most significant achievements included the development and adoption of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management. These were accepted at two Expert Level Follow-Up Meetings of the Helsinki Conference held in Geneva (1994) andAntalya (1995). Finally, the criteria, indicators and operational level guidelines for sustainable forest management were adopted as L2.Out of the six criteria for sustainable forest management, the criterion 'Maintenance, Conservation and Appropriate Enhancement of Biological Diversity in Forest Ecosystems' is of particular relevance to forest genetics.Under the concept area 'General Conditions' indicators are described as follows:• Existence and capacity of an institutional framework to maintain, conserve and appropriately enhance biological diversity at the ecosystem, species and genetic levels • Existence of informal means to implement the policy framework, and the capacity to:-develop new inventories and ecological impact assessments on biological diversity, and -develop tools to assess the effect of forest management on biological diversity.From a genetic point of view the Concept Area 'Threatened Species' and 'Biological Diversity in Production Forests' is of importance. Quantitative and descriptive indicators to be periodically reported should pinpoint at biodiversity changes and trigger action.• Existence of an appropriate legal or regulatory framework that provides legal instruments • Existence and capacity to develop and maintain the institutional framework • Existence of economic incentives • Existence of informal means to implement the respective policy framework, to protect threatened species or to ensure biological diversity in production forests.As quantitative indicators are mentioned: 1. Changes in the number and percentage of threatened species in relation to total number of forest tree species. 2. Changes in the proportions of stands managed for conservation and utilization of forest genetic resources (gene reserve forests, seed collection stands, etc.); differentiation between indigenous and introduced species. 3. Changes in the proportions of mixed stands of 2-3 tree species. 4. In relation to the total area regenerated, proportions of annual area of natural regeneration.The UN-ECE/FAO has cooperated with the pan-European process in the collection of information on these quantitative indicators by adapting the ongoing Temperate and Boreal Forest Resources Assessment 2000 (TBFRA). Nevertheless, information on some indicators could not be collected, chiefly because it became clear that harmonized reporting was not possible.Ad 1. Reference lists such as the IUCN Red Books and the IUCN Categories of Endangered Species should be used. The IUCN categories have already been accepted by different governmental organizations and other NGOs to asses locally (e.g. Gunatilleke and Gunatilleke 1991) or on a more global scale (e.g. Farjon et al. 1993) the risk driving tree species to, or close to, extinction. The TBFRA data on this issue are questionable. At a first glance, it looks simple to harmonize reports but the TBFRA has reported on this issue that in the UK 140 forest tree species occur in total, of which one species is endangered, while in Ireland 1000 different forest tree species should occur in total, none of them being close to extinction (Anonymous 1998b). These contrasting figures demonstrate the difficulties in reporting and make comparisons among different countries tricky.Ad 2. Problems may occur when proportions of area are compared among Signatory States. Management intensities of gene conservation stands may vary from strictly protected stands (cf. IUCN category I -strict nature reserve) to forest stands which have to be naturally regenerated but are still utilized according to local standards (cf. IUCN category IVmanaged resource protected area). To harmonize reporting, Signatory States have to develop commonly accepted technical terminology, for instance it has to be agreed upon when the term forest gene reserve can be used.Conditions to be checked when forest gene reserves were pragmatically declared:• Secured long-term ownership -Can we expect continuity in the status of ownership? Would securing by contract help and, if so, how can this be done with due regard to the accruing costs? How do we consider the right of access to the gene resource? • Continuity of natural regeneration -Is the existing extent of regeneration sufficient?Is it necessary to introduce measures supporting regeneration (e.g. fencing, reduction of game stock)? • No goals that conflict over the medium term -Are there goals which conflict with forestry, the protection of nature, or any other forms of utilization requiring space (settlements, traffic)? • Sufficient representativity for certain provenances -Are there sufficient numbers of stands for areas considered substantially homogenous (provenance region)? • Autochthonous origin -Is it possible to provide information on the autochthonous/indigenous origin of a stand? • High degree of hemeroby -How should the existing stock be assessed with regard to the natural plant association? • Reasons of exclusion due to earlier forms of management -In which way(s) was the stand managed in the past? Are selective uses and/or forms of management with low numbers of trees potential reasons for exclusion?• Necessity of coordination with international programmes and networks aiming at the conservation of genetic diversity -To which extent do the pending measures complement international efforts?Genetic conditions to be assessed when forest gene reserves are declared: • Sufficient genetic variety with respect to fitness-relevant properties -Are results from field experiments available and in which ways can the findings contribute in the selection of the resource populations? • Sufficient size of stands -Which size does the stand in question have? Will it be necessary that small stands, or even groups of trees, are also considered for conservation because of the rarity of a tree species? How many seed trees are involved in natural regeneration (census of the seed-bearing trees)? How many trees provide pollen (census of the male reproductive trees)? • Location of the stand within its natural habitat -What is the exact location of the stand at our disposal? Can we expect high adaptive potential because of the stand having an optimum location, or rather high adaptedness because the stand is located at the natural fringe of an area? • Measures of conservation consider sufficiently tree-specific variation patterns -In which ways are clinal and/or ecotype-specific variations with different properties considered in gene conservation measures? • Isolation -How is the location of the relevant stand with respect to other stands of the same tree species? Is migration desired or rather undesired? How are pollen and seed vectors to be assessed and in which ways could such assessment influence the selection of the necessary buffer zone? Is the non-availability of the buffer zone the decisive factor regarding its value for conservation? • Sufficient genetic variation of adaptive genetic markers -Are there results from genetic inventories regarding adaptive genetic markers? In particular, qualitative or at least pronounced clinal differences between regions can be very valuable. • Sufficient genetic variation of selective neutral genetic markers -Results from inventories including neutral genetic markers can be used to subdivide existing regions into smaller conservation units. Findings about the post-glacial immigration and the degree of migration can indirectly contribute to the selection of the resource populations.The above list demonstrates how manifold the requirements are that have to be examined prior to the selection of in situ stands that are worth conservation. Simply reporting the area designated as gene reserve in a Signatory State does not make sense unless the quality of in situ means are mentioned. The list also makes clear that the implementation of national and international gene conservation programmes meets with numerous difficulties. Relying on schematism, there will probably not be an optimal realization of any of the programmes. Each of them will need the setting of priorities, thereby taking account of the country-specific requirements of each programme.As far as reporting on changes in seed stand proportions is concerned, similar problems may occur. Among EU-Member States, which comprise approximately one half of all Signatory States, harmonization has been realized because the EC Directive 404/66 (Anonymous 1966) has been brought into force by national laws. However, comparisons of data derived from Non-Member Signatory States with data originating from Member States remain vague. Harmonization in this matter is a must. This task should be implemented as soon as possible in the course of Expert Level Meetings in the framework of the Ministerial Conferences and in close cooperation with EUFORGEN.Ad 3. This refers to species diversity and is of less genetic relevance. Data on area and spatial distribution pattern of rare species are meaningful. However, it may be very difficult to report reliable data on this issue. In those Signatory States where forest inventories were performed periodically, data will be available whilst in countries where this information is gathered based on national-wide forest management working plans or based on other descriptions (e.g. flora description), travel reports reliability of data is much more questionable.Ad 4. The degree of natural regeneration of a forest is doubtless a good indicator of sustainable forest management. The ability of forest tree populations to produce viable seeds and to create a viable new tree generation is extremely important. Trees may be badlyshaped or may not produce desirable wood products, but provided they are able to exist over generations by transmitting their genes, undesirable traits are meaningless from an evolutionary point of view. Since under appropriate environments also well-shaped trees have these capabilities of regeneration, the genepool in naturally regenerated stands is well conserved. Although this theorem has not yet been studied over full generations, the current state has not falsified this view.However, the same reluctance concerning the trustworthiness of data reported by Signatory States as mentioned above (Ad 3) is certainly advisable.As descriptive indicator is mentioned \"Existence of a legal/regulatory framework that provides for legal instruments to ensure regeneration of managed forests\". In many Signatory Countries the respective Forestry Act ensures that clearings or stands after clear felling or selective cutting are to be reforested.Political decision-makers have realized that a broad genetic basis is indispensable for the long-term stability of forests. Hence, many of the Resolutions agreed upon at the two Ministerial Conferences held in Helsinki (1993) and Lisbon (1998) are of conspicuous relevance to forest genetics, i.e. the Helsinki Resolutions H1 (General Guidelines for the Sustainable Management of Forests in Europe), H2 (General Guidelines for the Conservation of Biodiversity of European Forests) and H4 (Strategies for a Process of Long-Term Adaptation of Forests in Europe to Climate Change) as well as the Lisbon Resolution L2 (Pan-European Criteria, Indicators and Operational Level Guidelines for Sustainable Forest Management) refer to genetic diversity of forest tree populations. While H1 addresses mainly the preservation of wellfunctioning forest ecosystems through the use of appropriate forest reproductive material, H2 focuses on the conservation and enhancement of biological diversity per se. H4 encourages research in forest genetics related to adaptation processes under the scenario of a global climate change. Lisbon Resolution L2 describes criteria and indicators on an operational level. Due to pragmatic reasons, these criteria and indicators mainly aim at species diversity; however, the criterion Maintenance, Conservation and Appropriate Enhancement of Biological Diversity in Forest Ecosystems is of particular genetic relevance because certain indicators, such as the existence and capacity of the institutional framework to conserve and enhance genetic diversity, or the periodical reporting of changes in the proportion of stands managed for conservation of genetic resources, are outlined in L2. While implementation of the Lisbon Resolutions cannot be expected yet, progress in the follow-up action of the Helsinki Resolution is still unsatisfactory. Maybe this is linked to specific genetic problems or due to the fact that conferences more and more become political and that the technical implementation of the solutions of problems identified is dealt with in course of follow-up processes.For a long time foresters were regarded as trustees of sustainable forest management in the sense that provision of timber is sustainably ensured by appropriate management of forests. The notion of sustained timber production and its practical application had an extraordinarily stimulating effect on the development of forest sciences, particularly forest inventory, forest growth research and forest economics. In the context of the environmental movement of the 1960s, the timber-oriented perception of forests was challenged by an ecosystem-orientation focusing on the maintenance and enhancement of biological diversity. The environmental movement that not only seized the management of forests, but comprised all natural resources, peaked in the UN-sponsored Conference on Man and the Environment in 1972 in Stockholm. It reflected the high common concern for the protection and conservation of the global environment by establishing a new UN agency, the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). In the follow-up of the Stockholm Conference, ministries of environment were established in almost every country around the world. In concurrence with environmental NGOs the strength and power of these ministries increased significantly over the years, and they now play a central role in formulating and influencing national and global policies related to forestry. Since the Stockholm Conference, forest politics at the national, European and global levels has been characterized by two stances with different interests in the use of forests: the economic interest in timber production and the ecological interest in maintaining and enhancing environmental values such as biological diversity. The following policy analysis aims at detecting options for bridging the gap between these two positions.Forests produce not only timber but a whole variety of other goods and services (Table 1). Some of them are marketable, such as berries and Christmas trees, others are not marketable or not easy to sell, such as biodiversity or protection against avalanches. The marketability of goods is a given physical fact having to do with the exclusion of the goods and the rivalry of consumers. If one can easily exclude those from consumption, who do not pay (\"free riders\"), one can market a good. This is the case for private goods as well as for club or toll goods. Club goods differ from private goods in that they are non-rival in part. Examples are recreation facilities, national parks, and forest roads, since exclusion can be practiced and, although non-rivalling at low levels of usage, they are partially in competition because crowding occurs with more intensive use. The second feature determining the type of good, the rivalry in consumption of the individual consumers or the clubs, has an impact on the price. Rivalry in consumption triggers scarcity of a good which is an incentive to produce more of it -or to increase the price.Biological diversity means \"the variability among living organisms from all sources including, inter alia, terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the technological complexes of which they are part; this includes diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems\" (Art. 2 of the Convention on Biological Diversity). As we can see from Table 1, biodiversity is a public good. Once biodiversity is provided, it is difficult or costly to prevent others from enjoying it. If one benefits from biodiversity, there is no rivalry in consumption, assuming there are no crowding effects which turns biodiversity into a common-poll good (McKean 1998: p. 26). In most cases public goods including biodiversity result from the fact that they occur as positive externalities of production or consumption processes which have positive impacts to third parties. It follows that the market may fail in providing sufficient quantities of public goods of a certain quality. If more of these goods are needed, the welfare-optimizing state has to intervene by appropriate means, unless nongovernmental organizations take care of their provision, e.g. by means of forest certification (\"private policy-making\"). However, the latter aspect is beyond the scope of this paper. Intervention of the welfare-optimizing state into forest management will depend on the paradigm of forest management. In the prevailing forest paradigm of multiple-use forestry the objective function is to maximize periodic benefits minus costs of sale of wood and nonwood goods and services. State intervention has to ensure the minimum supply of nonmarketable forest services such as protection against erosion and biodiversity. The opposing environmental paradigm of forest ecosystem management is based on the principle of ecological sustainability. The objective function is to maximize resistance and resilience of forest ecosystems (including conservation of biodiversity) subject to minimum requirements of timber and non-timber products and services such as game and recreation which have to be ensured by legal regulations.The constraints aiming at the maintenance and enhancement of health, vitality and biological diversity of forest ecosystems, laid down in national forest and nature conservation laws, have been under development for centuries. They reflect the will of society to ensure positive and avoid negative externalities of forest management. From 1972 until recently this development has been strengthened at the European and international levels by legally-and non-legally-binding instruments related to forests (Table 2), which have a more or less severe impact on the results of the objective function through national legislation. In the follow-up of the UN Conference on the Environment and Development (UNCED, held 1992 in Rio de Janeiro) most of the forest acts of European countries were changed (Anonymous 1998: p. 7). In the following, the most significant international and European policy means which were initiated by one of the two camps are presented (see Tarasofsky 1995).Faced with the global problems of deforestation and forest degradation, since the 1970s the environmentalists were proactive in passing legally-binding instruments and non-legallybinding initiatives pursuing the objectives of preservation, conservation and protection of forest ecosystems. They developed massive pressure at the international and European levels. 1997-2000 (1997) International legislation began in 1972 with the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands which promotes the conservation of listed wetlands and the \"wise use\" of wetlands. In the same year the Stockholm Conference passed two international conventions, namely the World Heritage Convention and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna (CITES). The former provides for the protection of such heritage which is of \"outstanding universal value\" from several points of view, the second focuses specifically and exclusively on trade. International legislation of biodiversity peaked in the 1993 when it adopted the Convention on Biological Diversity which is the global treaty with the most significant potential effect on the conservation and sustainable management of forest resources. The preamble of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) states that the conservation of biological diversity is a \"common concern of humankind\", and that, while nations have sovereign rights over their biological resources, they also bear a responsibility for conserving their biological diversity and sustainably using their biological resources. The CBD imposes obligations in relation to in situ conservation (within natural surroundings) and ex situ conservation (e.g. botanical gardens and genebanks) of species, habitats, and ecosystems. The implementation of the CBD is facilitated by the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) as well as by new and additional financial resources to be provided by developed countries and administered by the Global Environmental Facility (GEF). The funds should primarily enable developing countries to meet the requirements of the CBD.At the European level, the European Council has passed the Fauna and Flora Habitats (FHH) Directive 92/43 which should effectively supplement the preceding Birds Directive 79/409. Both form the legal framework for the establishment of a coherent ecological network of special protection areas in all of Europe, better known as Natura 2000.Not less important than the legally-binding instruments on forests is the \"soft law\" of the environmental paradigm. The World Charter for Nature was proclaimed in the United Nations in 1982. It is the first international instrument that is intended to protect nature holistically for its own sake. The Statement of Forest Principles of UNCED is a breakthrough in the new understanding of sustainable forest management. It comprises the sustainable management, conservation and sustainable development of all types of forests \"(...) to meet the social, economic, ecological, cultural and spiritual needs of present and future generations. These needs pertain to forest products and services, such as wood and wood products, water, food, fodder, medicine, fuel, shelter, employment, recreation, habitats for wildlife, landscape diversity, carbon sinks and reservoirs, and other forest products.\" Although time was not yet ripe to achieve consensus on a global forest convention, the forest principles and norms based on the inclusive understanding of sustainable forest management had far-reaching effects on the international deliberations on forests.Chapter 11 of Agenda 21 on Combating Deforestation of UNCED strives to promote efficient utilization and assessment in order to recover the full value of the goods and services provided by forests (part C). Forest resources should be managed in a manner that is compatible with environmental conservation (par. 11.20). Improving recognition of the social, economic and ecological values of trees is one of the objectives (par. 11.21.a).In 1994, the World Conservation Union (IUCN) with the assistance of the World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC) published the Guidelines for Protected Area Management consisting of six categories which replace the former 10 IUCN categories published in 1978. These categories imply a gradation of human impacts: while the categories I-III are mainly concerned with the protection of natural areas where direct human intervention and modification of the environment has been limited, in categories IV-VI significantly greater intervention and modification has taken place.The Pan-European Biological and Landscape Diversity Strategy was adopted by the ministers of environment of 55 European countries in 1995 in Sofia, Bulgaria. It aims to reduce the threat and increase the resilience of Europe's biological and landscape diversity, to strengthen the ecological coherence of Europe as a whole, and ensure full public involvement in the conservation of the various aspects of biological and landscape diversity. In order to reach these aims, a sophisticated planning process is proposed, which mobilizes efforts and initiatives at all levels under one umbrella and breaks down a 20-year vision into 5-year Action Plans. The Action Plan 1996-2000 refers to 11 action themes; six of them deal with landscape and ecosystems (and one with forest ecosystems).Faced with the environmental activities for anchoring the new understanding of \"sustainable forest management\", the forest community tried to avoid too severe restrictions of efficient timber production by taking its own initiatives. Thus its activities were more reactive than anticipatory in the biodiversity issue.In the last 20 years two legally-binding instruments were passed or negotiated at the international and European levels. In 1983, the International Tropical Timber Agreement (ITTA) was adopted and renegotiated in 1994. The ITTA is primarily intended to be a commodity agreement between producer and consumer countries, and has established the International Tropical Timber Organisation (ITTO).The European Protocol on Mountain Forests of the Alpine Convention (1991) which is still not in force seeks to ensure healthy and stable mountain forests and provides financial incentives for appropriate mountain forest management.Non-legally-binding initiatives were driven by the Statement of Forest Principles which strongly influenced the Resolutions H1 and H2 of the Second Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe 1993 in Helsinki signed by 34 European countries and the European Union. Helsinki Resolution H1 on Sustainable Forest Management accepts and further develops the term \"sustainable forest management.\" It \"means the stewardship and use of forests and forest lands in a way and at a rate that maintains their biodiversity, productivity, regeneration capacity, vitality and their potential to fulfil, now and in the future, relevant ecological, economic and social functions, at local, national and global levels, and that does not cause damage to other ecosystems.\" Helsinki Resolution H2 on Conservation of Biodiversity accepts the CBD's definition of biological diversity and states that the conservation and appropriate enhancement of biodiversity should be an essential operational element in sustainable forest management. In the follow-up of the Helsinki Conference, political agreement was achieved on six pan-European criteria and 20 indicators of sustainable forest management at the national level. Criterion 4 deals with the Maintenance, Conservation and Appropriate Enhancement of Biological Diversity in Forest Ecosystems which is measured by five indicators.The political agreement on sustainable forest management at the national level was the basis for the Lisbon Resolution L2 on Pan-European Criteria, Indicators and Operational Level Guidelines for Sustainable Forest Management of the Third Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe held in 1998. It provides guidelines for sustainable forest management planning and practices at the sub-national level. The voluntary guidelines follow the pan-European criteria for sustainable forest management. The guidelines can be used as a reference tool for advising forest owners and forest managers in planning forest practices and supervising their implementation. It is planned that the Pan-European Forest Certification (PEFC) will refer to these guidelines.Both Pan-European Processes on the Protection of Forests and the Environment agreed in 1997 to a Work-Programme on the Conservation and Enhancement of Biological andLandscape Diversity in Forest Ecosystems 1997-2000. It should be noted that the European Union has signed all the international and European initiatives on sustainable forest management. Thus, the obligations to ensure sustainable forest management and biological diversity are integral parts of the Forestry Strategy for the European Union and the Regulation on Support of Rural Development (see below).The regulation activities from both the environmental and forest sides at the international (global), European and national levels cannot hide their underlying differing interests in forests which will certainly influence implementation and, therefore, policy impacts and outcome. As long as both sides seek to maximize their short-term self-interest and are not prepared for compromises, societal dilemma situations occur which leave all participants worse off than feasible alternatives. Rational choice theory, common-pool regimes, and the belief systems approach are three theoretical approaches that help to understand and overcome such situations.It does not make sense for an individual forest owner to employ silvicultural measures for the maintenance or even enhancement of biological diversity on its own, unless all competitors in the timber market do the same. As there is a free world market for timber, the efficiency of the individual owner's costly measures could be annihilated due to the impact of low-priced timber from competitors with environmentally harmful production methods. The egoistic rational behaviour of individual participants leads to a result which is not desired by any of them. The behaviour or the \"moves\" of each participating player depend on the moves of the other. It is true that the best collective result can only be achieved by cooperation, but the individual participant is even better off, if the others cooperate and he does not. As a \"free-rider,\" he would benefit from the advantages of cooperation without having to bear the cost. As everyone thinks accordingly, cooperation does not arise, and this is the worst collective variant. The individual forest owners are captured in a prisoner´s dilemma situation.There are several possibilities for overcoming such a dilemma situation. If there is a central authority, the provision of public goods can be ensured by state intervention, either by regulatory, economic and/or informational instruments. For forest issues, there is a central authority at the national, but not yet at the pan-European -it is the EU Council for the level of the European Union -and international levels.At the national level the provision of public goods can be enforced by means of the forest law, nature conservation law, hunting law etc.At the pan-European level the Work Programme of the Pan-European Processes is a promising departure for cooperation. It forces the environmental and forest parties to formulate a common report on the achievements as regards biodiversity, but it does not intend to become a central authority for mitigating conflicts of forest uses.Finally, at the international level the situation is further developed. From the preparatory meetings of the UNCED until the international forest policy dialogue within the Intergovernmental Panel on Forests (IPF) and its follow-up, the Intergovernmental Forum an Forests (IFF), the topic of an international legally-binding instrument for forests has been on the agenda. Although there is no central authority at the international level, there is an incentive for a group of states to overcome the problematic situation through agreement to adhere to common principles and norms, rules and decision-making procedures (Krasner 1982: p. 186). Such an agreement constitutes an international regime (Glück 1994: p. 85). The international regime on forests in a wider sense consists of the sum total of international instruments and institutions that create the framework for international activities as regards forests (e.g. Ramsar Convention, ITTA, and the Convention on Biological Diversity). In a narrower sense, the international forest regime would be the global forest convention which is still under discussion.Although there are many options for strengthening the existing international regime for forests (Glück et al. 1998), many European states as well as the European Union endorse a global forest convention. It is argued that a global forest convention would be the most inclusive international instrument on forests, because it comprises not only sustainable management, but also the conservation and sustainable development of all types of forests. A convention could fill in the gaps left by the existing international instruments for forests and, in particular, it could address problems of coordination. If no agreement on standards for the maintenance and enhancement of biodiversity in the context of sustainable forest management can be achieved, this could be left to the conference of parties. For the purpose of coordination national forest programmes would be extremely useful.National forest programmes (NFPs) can be described as a generic expression for a wide range of approaches to the process of planning, programming and implementing forest activities in countries. The novelty of NFPs constitutes their focus on sustainable management, conservation and sustainable development of forests and a comprehensive policy framework applicable at the national and sub-national levels. The latter consists of basic principles developed by FAO (1996) and the IPF process, such as participation, continuous interactive planning process, and a holistic and intersectoral approach. NFPs are the revival of the old concept of policy planning in order to render politics more rational, long-term oriented and better coordinated (Glück 1998, Glück 1999).Just recently, NFPs received special attention by the European Union for the coordination of forest uses as well as of impacts from other sectors of the economy (e.g. industry, agriculture) on forestry. National forest programmes serve the European Union to enforce the obligations which the European Union has taken by signing the international documents on forests. The EU Council Resolution on a Forestry Strategy for the European Union identifies under point 5d \"the implementation of international commitments, principles and recommendations through national or sub-national forest programmes or appropriate instruments developed by the Member States\" as substantial elements of the common Forestry Strategy. Furthermore, the EU Regulation on Support of Rural Developments demands the elaboration of national forest programmes for the provision of financial incentives (Art. 29, par. 4).We know from forest history of European countries that mountainous villagers engaged in collective action to sustainably manage their forests for timber and protection against torrents and avalanches without an external authority to offer incentives or impose sanctions. In the course of time, by trial and error the villagers have found a particular property rights arrangement, in which a group of resource users share rights and duties toward a resource. McKean (1998: p. 28) calls such social institutions a \"common-property regime\" and asserts that \"common-property regimes may be what we need to create for the management of common-pool resources, at least if we can identify the factors and conditions that lead to successful regimes\" (McKean 1998: p. 30). Common-property regimes are also promising institutions for reconciling the forest use in a restricted area for timber and biodiversity.In the traditional forest thinking it is difficult to grasp forests as common-pool resources like groundwater aquifers or any environmental sink over time. The reason is that foresters are not used to separate the physical characteristics of a good from the type of a right (private or public) and the owners of rights (private or public body). If one looks at the physical characteristics of forests, one will find that it is difficult or costly to exclude those from the use of forests who are interested in public goods such as protection against natural forces, amenity values or biodiversity. Furthermore, due to the competing relationships of timber production and other forest services there is rivalry in consumption of the various goods and services. The attribute of competing uses and high population pressure requiring coordination among users to cope with externalities makes vesting property rights in group more efficient than vesting those rights to either in a single individual or trying to parcel the resource into individually titled patches (Gibson et al. 1998: p. 6). It is important to point out that common property is shared private property, although in Switzerland the \"Burgergemeinden\" are allocated to public forests in the forest ownership statistics. The property rights in a common-property regime fulfil all the requirements of private property rights: they can be clearly specified (are not vague), they are secure (not subject to whimsical confiscation) if they receive appropriate legal support from governments, they are by definition exclusive to the co-owners of the rights (others than the members of the group are excluded from benefits), and in some settings they are fully alienable through sale or bequest (McKean 1998: p. 31).In comparison to individual private property or public property rights, according to McKean (1998: p. 32), common-property regimes on forests have some advantages. Firstly, they are a way of providing the rights to goods (e.g. timber, protection against natural forces) without privatizing or parcelling the rights to the resource itself. The group members \"share ownership of the productive stock without chopping it in half, and they parcel the flow of use units into individually owned rights (equivalent to shared private ownership, or common property)\" (McKean 1998: p. 33). Secondly, by leaving forest unparcelled and managing them in large units, common-property regimes multiply public goods such as biodiversity, compared to managing the same area in separated parcels. Thirdly, in a common-property regime the multiple negative externalities that are implicit in forest management can be internalized by making forest management decisions jointly. Then the uphill forests will be managed in such a way that the gain in protection of the downhill village against natural forces will be greater than the sacrifice of timber.\"Joint resource management through common-property regimes may enhance efficiency by internalizing externalities, just as Coaseian exchange permits people to enhance their joint efficiency by dealing directly with an externality\" (McKean 1998: p. 34). The difference between both collective actions is that the actors of Coaseian negotiations hold their individual property rights whereas the members of a common-property regime adhere to a particular property-rights arrangement. Both approaches share the high transaction cost for achieving a compromise. Common-property regimes have the additional weakness of internal collective action problems, because they are comprised of more than one individual owner. Temptations to cheat on community rules may arise inside a common-property regime.Supervision by state officials and financial incentives can reduce these shortcomings. Then, productive efficiency through team production and economies of scale may outweigh losses due to shirking and cheating.Based on the work of Ostrom et al. (1994) and others, McKean enumerates a series of attributes of successful common-property regimes which she summarizes in the following propositions for devising common-property regimes (McKean 1998: p. 43):• Community of users is already accustomed to negotiating and cooperating with each other on other problems • Existing, but recently weakened institutions where the habits and techniques of negotiation and compromise are still in evidence • Local and national elites, or significant portions of them, are sympathetic to the attempt • Financial support is probably undesirable because it might well undermine local cooperation • To create non-overlapping commons for different communities is preferable rather than to have several communities sharing a single huge commons.A common-property regime promises to be a highly efficient tenure system for simultaneously managing a forest resource for private and public goods within a certain area. Although most of the existing common-property regimes on forests aim at sustained yield of timber, and in some cases also sustained protection against natural forces, their objectives can be expanded to also cover other public goods such as biodiversity.A third promising theoretical approach to explain the activities of the two camps is Sabatier´s (1988) Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). It is a theoretical concept to explain policy change within a time perspective of a decade or more. It emphasizes the importance of values and beliefs of the participating actors and asks about the conditions for their development and change (Hogl 1999: p. 166). The focus is on policy subsystems, which are defined as the interactions of actors from different institutions seeking to influence governmental decisions in a given policy area, e.g. forest policy. Within the subsystem, the ACF assumes that actors can be aggregated into a number (usually two or three) of networks, so called \"advocacy coalitions\", composed of people from various governmental and private organizations who share a set of normative and causal beliefs and who often act in concert (Jenkins-Smith and Sabatier 1994: p. 180). In the forest policy area we can find again our two camps in the \"timber production coalition\" and the \"forest conservation coalition\" (see Hogl 1999, Elliott 1999).Sabatier distinguishes between three categories of beliefs which are organized into a hierarchical structure. He calls the highest level the \"deep core\" of the belief system, which includes basic ontological and normative beliefs. On the next level are \"policy core\" beliefs which represent a coalition's normative commitments and causal perceptions across an entire policy domain or a sub-system. The third level consists of \"secondary aspects\" of a coalition's belief system. They comprise policy preferences regarding desirable policy regulations and the design of specific institutions etc., for pursuing the policy core.In general, deep core beliefs operate across all policy subsystems; they function almost like a religion. Examples are the beliefs in democratic values such as freedom, equality and solidarity, the limitation of natural resources, etc.A coalition´s policy core beliefs represent a coalition´s basic normative commitments and causal perceptions across a subsystem. They include fundamental value priorities, such as primacy of timber production of the timber production coalition (Glück 1987) or environmental protection of the forest conservation coalition.Beliefs in secondary aspects of a coalition within a specific subsystem comprise a large set of narrower beliefs concerning the seriousness of the problem or the impacts of policy means (e.g. appropriate certification approach for ensuring biodiversity).Each coalition attempts to influence the behaviour of one or more governmental institutions in order to make them more consistent with its policy objectives. In the case of conflicts \"policy brokers\" may occur whose main concern is to find a compromise. This is possible because the coalitions are prepared to learn from experience. Jenkins-Smith and Sabatier (1994: p. 182) call that \"policy-oriented learning\" and assume that the reluctance to change decreases from the deep core beliefs to the secondary aspects of a coalition. Whereas deep core beliefs are very resistant to change, change of policy core beliefs can occur if empirical accumulation of evidence reveals serious anomalies. Beliefs in secondary aspects are assumed to be more readily adjusted in the light of new data, experience, or changing strategic considerations. To sum up, policy-oriented learning is an important aspect of policy change, and can often alter secondary aspects of a coalition´s belief system, but changes in the policy core aspects of a governmental programme are usually the results of perturbations external to the subsystem (Jenkins-Smith and Sabatier 1994: p. 183).The probability of policy-oriented learning is a function of three variables: the level of conflict (hypothesis 6), the analytical tractability of the issue (hypotheses 7 and 8), and the presence of a professional forum (hypothesis 9). In detail, the ACF hypotheses are as follows.Hypothesis 6: Policy-oriented learning across belief systems is most likely when there is an intermediate level of informed conflict between the two coalitions. This requires that (i) each have the technical resources to engage in such a debate; and that (ii) the conflict be between secondary aspects of one belief system and core elements of the other or, alternatively, between important secondary aspects of the two belief systems. Hypothesis 7: Problems for which quantitative data and theory exist are more conducive to policy-oriented learning across belief systems than those in which data and theory are generally qualitative, quite subjective, or altogether lacking.Problems involving natural systems are more conducive to policy-oriented learning across belief systems than those involving purely social or political systems because in the former many of the critical variables are not themselves active strategists and because controlled experimentation is more feasible.Policy-oriented learning across belief systems is most likely when there exists a forum which is (i) prestigious enough to force professionals from different coalitions to participate; and (ii) dominated by professional norms. Elliott (1999: p. 429) found in his analyses of the development of certification programmes in three countries (Indonesia, Canada and Sweden), using the ACF as a theoretical reference framework, that referring to hypothesis 6 \"there has clearly been policy-oriented learning across belief systems in Sweden as evidenced by the identification of biodiversity conservation as a key issue. Both coalitions had the technical resources to engage in the debate and the level of conflict was generally intermediate\". As regards hypotheses 7 and 8 he ascertains that \"the collection of quantitative information on biodiversity conservation by scientists and NGOs catalyzed changes in policy core beliefs in both coalitions.\" As to hypothesis 9 he states that \"the Swedish FSC working group provided such a forum, and its effectiveness can be attributed in large part to the fact that it met both these criteria\". The four hypotheses on policy-oriented learning are also supported, at least in part, by Indonesia and Canada.Although this paper deals only with biodiversity, there is an increasing demand and even pressure on forest management to provide more public goods of a certain quality than are provided as positive externalities of exclusive timber production. This development raises a series of questions with potentially far-reaching impacts. Some of them are the following: Will the market forces meet the increasing demand? Are institutional consequences as regards forest tenure to be expected in the long term? Is mediation possible between the traditional and new forest uses? Does international and European forest policy benefit from this development? The three theoretical approaches discussed above allow us to draw some conclusions, at least about the direction in which the development goes.The market mechanism fails in the appropriate production of public goods. As their price is zero, the forest owner has no incentive to produce more of them than is supplied as positive externalities of timber production. However, some of the forest public goods are transformed into impure public goods (local public goods and club goods), for which a price can be charged, but this does not hold for all of them. Furthermore, if society demands timber from sustainably managed forests, the societal demand could be reflected by a market demand for certified timber. However, as existing surveys have found (Pajari et al. 1999), the consumers do not take much care from which forests the commodities come from. Thus, the conclusion can be drawn that the market potential should be fully utilized, but it cannot solve the sufficient provision of additional demands for all forest public goods.These findings have unavoidably triggered discussions on the appropriate combination of property rights and forest goods. There is an overwhelming consensus among economists and social scientists that private property is an inadequate arrangement for public goods for the above reasons, but an appropriate one for private goods such as timber products. As timber will not lose its economic importance in the future, but the relative importance of public goods will increase, new forms of forest ownership such as common-property regimes may develop. Such an institutional change in property rights on forests depends on the extent to which (i) private and public forest owners do not meet the new demands, (ii) the new demands on forest public goods increase, and (iii) the attributes of successful commonproperty regimes will be investigated.The latent conflicts between the timber production and the nature conservation network should not be underestimated. They are based on ideological beliefs on both sides and, therefore, difficult to change. However, the advocacy coalition framework assumes that the coalitions are prepared to learn from experience and to make compromises. This process can be supported by independent mediators (\"policy brokers\"), professional discussion forums as well as by empirical, scientifically based studies on the issues in question.The international instruments, initiatives and discussions on forests reveal that (i) many forest issues, such as pollution of forests or loss of biodiversity in forests, are global issues which affect the common heritage of mankind (\"common public goods\") which cannot be left to national jurisdictions, and (ii) the sovereign states were not able to solve these issues. An internationally-binding instrument on forests could certainly be an appropriate option when sufficient agreement is achieved on the content of obligations intended to be legally-binding.In this context national forest programmes gain importance for the implementation and evaluation of internationally achieved agreements. As regards the European Union, the employment of NFPs provides the European Union with additional influence in forest policy issues.The environmental conditions under which species exist are a result of the ambient abiotic conditions as well as the biotic components of that ecosystem. As components of an ecosystem, trees and other living organisms are continuously exposed to global changes. The changes connected with a greenhouse effect are more a question of degree than of new types of genetic processes differing from those occurring under \"normal\" environmental changes.During the first part of my presentation I shall comment on the dispersal ability which has been much discussed by ecologists. Secondly I shall discuss the ability to acclimate in a broad sense and finally I shall discuss the ability to respond genetically. Most of the time will be devoted to the genetic ability. Any of these abilities may help a species to survive in the long term. However, the ability to acclimate has its greatest significance for short-term survival. After that I will briefly discuss methods of gene conservation.Before discussing the different abilities it is useful to present some definitions. Fitness is the contribution of an individual to the next generation in relation to the contribution of others to the next generation. Adaptability is the ability of a population to respond genetically or phenotypically to any change in the environment. Adaptation is the process of becoming adapted.The dispersal ability is dependent on the vectors transferring the seeds, acorns, nuts, or other propagules. Generally, species with wind transfer have the capacity to spread their propagules over wider distances than species with animals as vectors. There is no definite border between the two. Also the size or the weight of the propagules will influence the dispersal ability.In many papers treating the ecological consequences of global warming the dispersal ability takes a prominent position. In my opinion many treat the consequences in a very simplistic way. Mostly the question is \"Where will the present climatic conditions be found after global warming?\" Based on this, the new distribution area is predicted without any consideration of the potential to acclimate or to evolve. Generally it is a question of pushing the southern border of a species northward as in the case of Norway spruce which in one prediction will have its southern border in Scandinavia close to latitude 60ºN instead of 56ºN which is the border today.Many ecologists fear that most species will not be able to migrate fast enough to cope with the speed of change in the environment expected after global warming. This is based on knowledge about previous rates of migration of different species. If this is true species mainly have to rely on the ability to respond genetically.As seen from Figure 1 phenotypic plasticity is the amplitude of a trait that a genotype can take when studied in several different environments. There is a variation in phenotypic plasticity among traits. The stronger the genetic control of a trait, the less the phenotypic plasticity. Trees with their indeterminate growth have a large potential to develop large phenotypic plasticity in growth traits. It is generally assumed that generative traits show a lower phenotypic plasticity than growth traits.Growth over a broad span of site conditions will probably contribute to the development of phenotypic plasticity. If this is accompanied by a continuous distribution and wind pollination the ideal combination for development of a large phenotypic plasticity prevails. Under such conditions phenotypic plasticity is expected to contribute to fitness. There is probably a difference between annual plants and long-lived tree species because the former can respond genetically to the changes in environmental conditions between years. Phenotypic plasticity does not contribute to fitness in annual plants in the same way as it does for tree species which have to endure large fluctuations among years in environmental conditions. Based on these assumptions it is expected that long-lived tree species such as Norway spruce, Scots pine and birches have a large phenotypic plasticity, since they are wind-pollinated with a continuous distribution and they grow over a broad range of climatic and sometimes edaphic conditions. Tree species with scattered distribution, with shortflying animals as pollen vectors, and which are demanding with respect to site conditions will probably have less phenotypic plasticity. Thus through adaptation they might have become specifically adapted to particular site conditions, which means that various ecotypes might be found in such species.The role of phenotypic plasticity is complex since it may be regarded as a disguise of the genotype, in this way so to say 'fooling' natural selection. Natural selection is most efficient when there is a close relationship between genotype and phenotype. In recent decades it has become more and more evident that not only traits are regulated genetically but also their phenotypic plasticity as well.It is assumed that phenotypic plasticity contributes to fitness in species with certain combinations of ecological characteristics. This is why there is a dashed arrow in Figure 1 pointing from the ability to acclimate to the ability to respond genetically.Environmental gradientFig. 1. Sche matic illustration of the ab ilities ne eded for sur vival under global war ming w ith speci al emphasis on phenotypic plasticity.This ability is dependent on the presence of additive variance. Additive variance is that part of the genetic variation that can be influenced by natural selection. (According to the definition additive variance is the variance of breeding values. The breeding value of a genotype is the double deviation of its progeny from the global mean of all progenies tested in the same experiment.).From Figure 2 it is evident that available additive variance depends on genetic drift which is a random process leading to homozygosity. It increases exponentially with decreasing number of mating individuals. Increase in homozygosity at the cost of heterozygosity reduces the amount of additive variance. Genetic drift is a strong evolutionary force in populations with less than 20 mating trees. In principle inbreeding causes the same effect as genetic drift. When genetic drift or inbreeding dominate, the amount of additive variance is low. In this context it might be of interest to discuss how many mating trees are needed for a good sample of additive variance in a species. This number is also dependent on random genetic drift which at high numbers does not influence additive variance much. Thus a random sample of 500 mating trees will capture 99.9% of the additive variance while addition of another 500 trees will only raise this figure to 99.95%. Therefore, some population geneticists talk about the magic number of 500. This figure has recently been challenged because some of the additive variance might reduce the fitness of its carrier. To overcome this, 5000 trees would be a better estimate of the number needed. On the other hand, directional selection over 100 generations in much smaller populations than 500 has resulted in a continuous response to this kind of selection. It indicates that enough additive variance was available during all these generations. If one prefers a conservative approach to sampling, then the larger number is needed. However, this means that enough trees will seldom be available for gene conservation of rare and less common tree species. Mutations at individual loci occur at a low rate, varying between one per ten thousand to one per million per generation. Therefore, mutations give a small contribution to the additive variance. However, the summed mutation rates in all loci influencing a quantitative trait are estimated to be several times higher. Fertilization with pollen coming from other populations may increase the additive variance considerably. This is referred to as geneflow.A species with continuous distribution before global warming may be fragmented owing to global warming. Therefore, species with this kind of distribution are more likely to be affected by global warming than species with an already scattered or disjunct distribution. Fragmentation may influence the genetic drift, inbreeding, and geneflow.A schematic illustration of the effect of fragmentation is given in Figure 3. The two central populations become extinct after global warming. The strength of the geneflow is indicated by the breadth of the arrows. The figure illustrates that the strength of the geneflow decreases with the distance between the populations. There is no geneflow between the two most distant populations before fragmentation. Intuitively it is believed that such fragmentation will lead to a complete isolation of the two surviving populations with an accompanied decrease of additive variance. However, there are a few investigations showing that there was a stronger geneflow between previously isolated populations. In consequence, fragmentation will lead to increased additive variance in the remaining populations. Therefore, we cannot state that fragmentation is detrimental in all cases for the continued survival of a species.if the populations are small genetic drift random loss of genes Increased variance through \"forced \"geneflow between the populationsChanged environment leading to loss of central populations Even if I have praised additive variance as most essential for the ability to respond genetically in changed environmental conditions, there is another side of the coin. In the short run a homogeneous population without any additive variance may be more competitive in a specific environment than a heterogeneous one. The additive variance might be regarded as a genetic load in the short term. When the environmental conditions are expected to change dramatically, extra concern for the vegetatively or asexually propagated species with limited additive variance is justified as regards priorities in gene conservation. This may be relevant for some tree species belonging to the Rosaceae family.Adaptive traits may be positively or negatively correlated with each other. If the correlations are negative, progress in one trait results in recession in the other trait. Therefore, in such a case the ability to respond genetically in both adaptive traits is considerably constrained (Fig. 4). The stronger the positive correlation is between two adaptive traits, the greater the possibility for genetic response. From the above discussion it is obvious that either the dispersal ability or the ability to respond genetically has to be larger than the speed of the environmental change in order to guarantee the survival of a species (see Fig. 5). The ability to respond genetically depends largely on the presence of additive variance. The ability to acclimate is mainly of importance in the short-term perspective. It is also evident that a long-generation species must contain more additive variance than an annual species to cope with the change genetically. One way of classifying gene conservation methods is to distinguish between static and dynamic methods. Above I have strongly emphasized the need for species to be able to respond to the expected changes in the environment. This means that any static method for preservation of the present genetic structure is not useful. Seed banks are excluded. More than 20 years ago the North American scientist Gene Namkoong developed the concept of multiple populations in tree breeding to cope with changes in trait values and environmental changes. Later on he extended the concept of Multiple Population Breeding System (MPBS) to encompass both breeding and gene conservation. Some 15 years ago he showed that breeding, if carried out according to this concept, takes care of gene conservation. The essence of MPBS is that the combined breeding and gene conservation population is subdivided into approximately 20 subpopulations. These subpopulations are distributed over a broad array of site conditions and during the course of the development of the subpopulations their genetic structure may be changed by natural selection, i.e. adaptation has taken place in the subpopulations. One schematic example of the principles and merits of the MPBS is given in Figure 6.Besides the advantage of being dynamic, the MPBS method increases the amongsubpopulation additive variance over generations while keeping the within-population additive variance at a satisfactory level. The speed of response to selection may also be faster in several small populations than in one large population. If the sampling of the subpopulations incorporates the span of site conditions existing over the distribution area of a species, then it is a guarantee for capturing low-frequency genes. In Figure 7 one difference between dynamic and static gene conservation is illustrated. Static gene conservation is widely accepted as regards agricultural crops. The objective of gene conservation in crop plant species is mostly to have a material ready for breeders who want to transfer a desired gene into a high-yielding variety. This can be accomplished by 7-8 generations of back crossings, a technique that is beyond the possibility for long-lived forest trees. If the forest tree breeder's objective is preservation of the present genetic constitution as a reference for future comparisons, then ex situ storage of seeds or other propagules is the most efficient method. The essence of dynamic gene conservation is to promote adaptation by exposing the gene resource population to natural selection. It should be noted that this might be obtained both by ex situ and in situ methods. Educated guesses about future environmental conditions can help to prepare the gene resource populations for adaptation under the new conditions. A prerequisite for natural selection to be operative is that the gene resource population is large enough to avoid genetic drift. Since additive variance is another prerequisite for natural selection, the sampling should be carried out such that maximum additive variance is captured. To achieve sampling without any genetic knowledge, educated guesses about existing genetic variation must guide the sampling. If successful we shall be close to the maximum of the genetic part of the adaptability.A fulfilment of these requirements is part of adaptive genetic management. As regards natural populations that have been designated as gene resource populations, it is obvious that dynamic gene conservation requires that the gene resource population is regenerated. We have seen too many cases where a gene resource population is being replaced by a population of another species owing to a don't touch attitude to gene resource populations. Such an attitude means that the designated gene resource population is a dead end. Thus, active measures should be taken whenever there is a need for maintenance of the gene resource population over generations. It is expected that there will be a strong pressure on forest land in future. Therefore, it is important to evaluate whether or not a potential gene resource population has its long-term existence threatened before it is designated as a gene resource population.The multiple population breeding system (MPBS) is the best method for a dynamic forest tree gene conservation.Either the dispersal ability or the ability to respond genetically has to be larger than the speed of change for a species to survive under environmental changes. As regards the genetic part there is no principle difference in the processes going on under more \"normal\" environmental conditions than under global warming; it is rather a question of degree. Under rapid environmental change dynamic gene conservation becomes more important than ever before. The Multiple Population Breeding System is a good system to apply. It should be emphasized that measures should be taken to guarantee regeneration of the gene resource populations.There are numerous reasons for concern with regard to the future of global forest resources. The general public perceives three main problem areas:• The destruction and degradation of forest cover in developing countries both in the arid and humid tropical/subtropical zones • The loss of biological diversity due to non-sustainable forest management practices • Consequences of expected environmental changes, especially climate change on forest ecosystems.The possible effect of environmental changes on forest ecosystems is treated by many authors as a problem of stability, determined by the diversity of the communities. It is widely believed that in natural conditions diversity (mostly understood as species diversity) is ecologically balanced and optimized. Accordingly, natural processes of selection and succession follow and buffer environmental changes even in worst-case scenarios, such as elevated temperatures and increasing aridity at medium latitudes. Mediterranean-type vegetation is forecast in large parts of western Europe as well as the northward advance of deciduous and boreal forest zone limits.The underlying concept is that these processes function best in natural-state communities where the genetic diversity of natural species contains an optimum of adaptive potential to effectively counterbalance unforeseeable changes. The restoration of natural diversity conditions, of natural plant communities appears to be a logical and sound measure to take. In this respect, however, questions to be addressed are:• Is diversity per se a goal, which warrants stability and adaptability? In addition, are all elements of diversity equally important? • Should human interference in forest ecosystems (e.g. change of dominant tree species composition, artificial regeneration, selection through intermediate cutting) be regarded as necessarily destructive?Presuming an effective functioning of ecological optimization (i.e. adaptation), ecotypic variation has to be anticipated at the within-species level, which means in genetic terms:• Small effective population sizes • Relative reproductive isolation • Existence of site-specific alleles.In case of relatively fast environmental changes, locally adapted population structure would lead to acclimation problems, causing irreparable loss of certain alleles and adaptation stress. If this holds true, a need for immediate action arises in areas where significant climate changes are anticipated. On the other hand, genetic research results from the last decades show that:• Much of the observed genetic variation pattern is adaptively not interpretable • Effective population sizes are unexpectedly large • Geneflow between populations is strong • Acclimation of introduced species or of transferred populations is fast• Most of the genetic variation is found at the within-population level • Epigenetic effects seem to provide a yet unknown potential for plasticity • Few cases of environment-specific allelic distribution could be verified.The above facts support the opinion that there is a significant genetic buffering capacity in the investigated forest tree species, which means at the same time that precise adaptation to local site conditions is improbable due to constraints of the genetic system. From the point of view of gene conservation, this picture implies that in general, changes in environmental conditions do not cause an immediate emergency situation, such as irreparable losses of unique vital alleles.Then, what triggers mass mortality phenomena observed in the last years for a number of tree species? The genetic and ecological causes have to be investigated thoroughly because the results contribute significantly to our perception of the response of natural ecosystems to changing conditions. Valuable information can be gathered from:• Common garden experiments, i.e. provenance tests • Time series on mortality with regard to climate extremes.When investigating causes for ecosystem or population-level adaptation constraints, the following main effects should be pointed out:• Limitations in migration • Exhausted buffering capacity • Distribution pattern of the species • Human interference.Migration speed of forest tree species, in terms of expanding distribution limits, has been explored from paleobotanical data. In general, the average advance velocity, following large-scale interglacial warmings, seems to fall between 100 and 400 m per year for most species. In a worst-case scenario for Central Europe, i.e. a warming of 2.5 o C in 35 years, the northward switch of isotherms would be much faster. The south-north horizontal movement might be 1.5 to 3.5 km per year. This is a magnitude faster than indicated by paleobotanical data. In vertical direction, the increase in temperature requires a much slower pace, i.e. around 15 m in altitude per year.The given figures refer to the migration of species in form of seeds. No data are available about the velocity of geneflow by pollen, i.e. how fast alleles migrate within the distribution area of the species. Given the high intensity of geneflow, the speed must probably exceed seed migration by 2 magnitudes.The above speculations imply that with changing conditions the allelic frequencies of populations might be adjusted relatively fast, however it has been also shown that this has only limited importance.On the southern limits of the deciduous forest belt, on the edge of the continental steppe zone, the situation is different. It has to be said clearly that in these areas the problem is first of all that there are no alternative tree species that might take over the successional positions of species which have reached the limits of their tolerance and disappear from the ecosystem.Even in less threatened positions migration by natural means is hampered by human interference. Climate change scenarios calculate with unconstrained natural succession; in reality forests in Central Europe are under intense silvicultural management, where artificial regeneration leaves little space for natural processes. Even if this were the case, the fragmentation of the forest cover limits the migration of species.Mass mortality phenomena have been experienced in Central Europe in connection with a series of drought years, stressing especially the populations planted outside of their original area of distribution. A good example is the fate of Norway spruce in West Hungary. But even within natural distribution areas, \"Waldsterben\" was proven to be triggered first of all by low rainfall and high summer temperatures, such as in the case of oaks.Fragmentation and regulated forest management affects nearly all the forest cover in Central Europe. This leads not only to restriction of species migration, but in case of \"minor\" species to reproductive isolation and interception of geneflow, even to local extinctions.For widely distributed, economically important species these threats are not relevant except for the populations at the southern/low elevation limits of the distribution area. As species occurrence in these areas is restricted by the genetically limited tolerance of the species, any significant unfavourable shift of environmental conditions triggers first a productivity loss, followed by increased mortality.Even before the appearance of \"Waldsterben\" symptoms, sexual reproduction and regeneration are increasingly hindered. Vitality loss and mortality affects the older age classes first, resulting in fructification decline and loss of seed viability. Regeneration conditions become increasingly difficult not only because of more infrequent and lowvitality seed crop, but also due to microclimate change on the ground (decreasing topsoil moisture, weed and shrub competition due to canopy gaps).Expected climate instability threatens first of all the southern, low elevation, and continental climate peripheries of the distribution area of the main forest tree species. To a lesser extent, populations growing in smaller mountain ranges, where no \"reserve altitude\" is available to migrate into, are also endangered. Species with scattered or restricted distribution, as well as those with low-density occurrence are more threatened than the main tree species.In view of expected climate stress conditions, gene conservation programmes should consider for economically important species the northward relocation of breeding populations and the evacuation of valuable, threatened outlier populations on the southern fringes of distribution.For species with restricted distribution and low density, evacuation into archives or new habitat is necessary. Admixed species occurring in stands of economically important tree species should be included into the gene conservation efforts.It should be made clear that in areas threatened by unfavourable climate changes, human interference is indispensable. The policy to lower management intensity and to leave adjustment of forest communities to natural forces will generally not be applicable. The interference of foresters to maintain forest cover and to keep adaptable populations is an important contribution to the stability of forest ecosystems.Targets of conservation and evacuation measures should be populations with high phenotypic plasticity, growing on favourable, sufficiently variable sites. Priority should be given to stability over autochthonous origin, both on genetic (population) and community (species) level. This implies that the maintenance of adaptively less important diversity within and between populations is of secondary importance.Forest management in the threatened zones should be understood as the stewardship of a stable forest cover in the interest of maintaining the vital ecological functions of the forest in the human environment. In most countries, however, society is not readily acknowledging the obvious need for supporting these activities by external funding.The maintenance of biological diversity has become an important element of sustained forest management. The aggressive realization of this basically correct policy provokes, however, certain questions especially in Central Europe, where human interference in forest ecosystems shaped the genetic resources of present stands and plant communities, and where ecological consequences of civil engineering measures of the past (first of all changes in hydrological conditions), as well as expected climate changes, threaten the future of the forest resources.The development of criteria and indicators for assessing the sustainability of forestry practices is an international process, where several organizations are at work either for temperate and boreal or for tropical forests. The criteria span biological, economical, sociological and legal issues.The purpose of this presentation is to discuss the population genetics foundations behind genetic criteria and indicators. I will first review some basic relevant aspects in population genetics, then I consider the application of these principles for tropical forestry (Namkoong et al. 1996;Namkoong et al. submitted), and last I will discuss the relevance of these criteria for temperate and boreal forests.We first consider the evolutionary forces that govern the genetic variability in populations. These are mutation, the mating system and recombination, genetic drift, migration, and selection. We know quite well the basic principles of population genetics which determine how these forces influence variability and its distribution in populations (Kimura andCrow 1970, Gillespie 1998). It is always necessary to consider the balance of evolutionary forces. In the simplest case (with no selection), mutation and drift will determine the level of variability. The expected heterozygosity at some locus, H, will be 4Nµ/(1+4Nµ), where N is the effective population size and µ the mutation rate. The commonly used genetic markers are often considered to be only weakly if at all influenced by selection, and thus governed by this equation. As an example, we know that the North American red pine (Pinus resinosa) has very low variability at marker genes (Fowler and Morris 1977), whereas Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) is one of the most variable organisms; for review, see e.g. Muona (1990). Since there is no reason to suspect that these two species would have very different mutation rates, the conclusion is that red pine has a much smaller (maybe two orders of magnitude) effective population size. Noting that the current distribution range of red pine is large, what counts here is a bottleneck in an earlier time, the effects of which are still being seen. This also illustrates that historical effects can have large influence on genetic variability (Nei et al. 1975, Fowler andMorris 1977). Further, this shows that we cannot point to some level of variability at marker genes that pine trees would need to survive. For a long time, red pine has been a successful species, despite lack of variation (but not favourite of tree breeders!). Genetic variability in Australian Acacias (measured as expected heterozygosity at the same set of loci in different species ) ranged from about 0.02 to more than 0.30 (Moran et al. 1989). Again, historical effects are likely to account for these differences between species with rather similar life histories.Many of the factors listed, genetic drift, migration and mating system will affect, on average, all loci in the genome in a similar way. An important exception is selection, where the effects are highly locus-specific. To illustrate this principle again with Scots pine, the autumn frosts in northern Europe will certainly distinguish the genotypes which are dormant and frost-resistant from those which continue growth too late. However, all genotypes at a marker locus might have equal probabilities of survival in the face of such frost. The effects of the selection depend on the balance between migration and selection. If selection is strong, relative to migration, the populations will differentiate, as is found with respect to frost tolerance in Scots pine in Finland (Hurme et al. 1997). If migration is extensive relative to selection (Koski 1970), then no differentiation is expected to occur, as is found at marker loci, also in Scots pine (Karhu et al. 1996).From basic population genetics theory, we also understand how changes in the evolutionary factors will influence genetic variability. For instance, increased genetic drift will reduce variability within a population, and increase variation between populations. Or increased directional selection would alter the gene frequencies, as well as reduce variation. Increased migration will render populations more homogeneous (at least if selection is not considered). Many population genetics textbooks describe these principles (Gillespie 1998).There are about 100 000 species of trees, of which nearly 10 000 species are threatened. Forestry is one of the causes threatening these species. Forestry is often combined with other threats to the species as well: changes in climate, altering patterns of land use. Sustainable forestry does not only refer to the forest tree species, but the health of the whole ecosystem must be addressed.Gene Namkoong led a process aimed at developing criteria and indicators for mainly tropical forestry, under the auspices of CIFOR, the Center for International Forestry Research based in Indonesia (Namkoong et al. 1996;Namkoong et al. submitted). A set of criteria was developed in a workshop held in Indonesia in 1996, and these were later tested in Cameroon.Genetic sustainability could be construed as maintaining current genetic variability. However, there is no possibility to obtain such baseline data on all relevant species. Also, as discussed above, there is no minimum level of genetic variability that can be designated as necessary for the genetic health of the species, even among species with similar life histories. Thus, the criterion for genetic sustainability of forestry was chosen to be \"Conservation of the processes that maintain genetic variation\".It is evident that we cannot directly see the processes, but they are reflected in various ways in the genetic composition of the populations. Observing changes in such processes is even more difficult. The effects of the changes in processes become visible over long time spans. A further constraint is that current population genetics is a high-tech labour-intensive effort, the criteria developed for practical silviculture must be easy to assess, by people who are not fully trained geneticists, but more likely forest technicians in tropical countries.The use of forest resources can take several forms: logging, grazing, harvesting of nontimber forest products. Rather than trying to directly relate their consequences on genetic variability, we need to consider the effects on the evolutionary factors. For instance, if a population of 1000 trees is thinned to one tenth of its density, how will genetic variability be affected? If we assume that there are no other effects besides the density reduction, then the change would be through an increase in genetic drift. Drift depletes genetic variation at the rate of 1/(2N) per generation. Instead of losing 1/2000 of variability per generation, the rate of loss of genetic variation would be 1/200 per generation, one half of one percent, a difference so small in one generation as not to be detectable, nor worth the concern to try to detect it.Silvicultural measures can be classified with respect to what kinds of changes they are likely to cause in the evolutionary processes. In most cases the effects will not be as simple as above, because many silvicultural measures could have effects on many factors, e.g. a reduction in the density of trees could also influence behaviour of pollinators, and thus cause a change in the mating system. Such complex interactions are perhaps especially likely in tropical ecosystems where animal pollination is frequent, rather than in wind-pollinated conifer forests. The proposal by Namkoong et al. (1996) tabulates various silvicultural measures with respect to their effects on evolutionary factors.We then developed five indicators of the genetic processes for assessing the effects of forestry management. These are: level of genetic variation, directional changes in gene or genotypic frequencies, gene migration between populations, mating system, and as a fifth indicator, feasibility of preventive of restorative actions (Namkoong et al. submitted).All of these indicators are accompanied by verifiers, which are actually measured in the forests. For most of the genetic indicators, there are two levels of verifiers. Demographic verifiers are easy and cheap to measure, and we hope have predictive power for the real genetic verifiers. For instance, the demographic verifiers for level of genetic variability are: number of sexually mature individuals (N>50), the number of reproducing individuals (N>30), and the phenotypic coefficient of variation. If there are enough reproducing individuals, we would not worry about the effects of genetic drift. The phenotypic variation could suggest that there is also genetic variation. If these verifiers were to fail, then it would be necessary to go to the genetic verifiers, and measure numbers of alleles or gene diversity at marker loci, or measure additive genetic variation for quantitative traits. We also tried to include critical levels for the different verifiers (above in parentheses).Likewise, demographic and genetic verifiers were developed for all indicators.It is evident that this process is not finished. The applicability of the system has been tested in Cameroon, after which the details were further defined, but more tests will be necessary. Research into the relationships between the demographic and genetic verifiers is needed. There are solid theoretical predictions, the accuracy of which needs to be tested in field situations.The population genetic principles governing genetic variability hold equally in tropical and temperate or boreal forests. There are still many important differences between the ecosystems and forestry practices that need to be considered. The relatively low numbers of tree species in the boreal and temperate forests are largely wind-pollinated. For some species, human influence has lasted for thousands of years, such that hardly any natural populations are left. Other species, at least in some areas, are just entering the phase of intensive domestication and improvement. Thus, \"forestry\" in a broad sense does not just concern logging operations. We also need to consider gene reserve populations, breeding populations, multiplication populations, and actual production populations. For many such species, there are large amounts of data available.We have suggested that at least boreal conifers are, from the population genetic aspects, rather robust in the face of forestry (Savolainen and Kärkkäinen 1992). The forestry practices and their consequences are rather well understood. There is, however, an important limitation. Most of the work is based on marker genes, and quantitative variation has not been directly studied.Within the framework of EUFORGEN the emphasis is on genetic variation in forest trees. However, forestry has its most significant effects elsewhere. For instance in Finland, forestry practices endanger many other plant species and animals, as old forests become rare. Many of these species will also face genetic consequences of losing their habitat.The European temperate and boreal forests provide excellent opportunities for studying and understanding the relationships between forestry practices and genetic variation in the widely used species. This understanding can then be applied to Europe's less studied species, and for species in other biogeographical areas.Karen Ter-Ghazaryan Forest Research and Experimental Centre, Ministry of Nature Protection, Yerevan, ArmeniaThe Trans-Caucasus sub-region is situated in the southern part of the former Soviet Union (FSU), covering an area of 186 340 km 2 between 38°26' and 43°34' of the northern longitude, and 40º00' and 50º20' of the eastern latitude.There are three former Soviet Union countries located in the sub-region: Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia.In Armenia, the agricultural sector (which included forestry up to 1995) accounted for 38% of GDP in 1996, and employed about 25% of the active labour force. The land reform in 1991 has resulted in the privatization of most agricultural land (tilled land, not grazing areas) and livestock, resulting in an estimated 325 000 new landholders (1997), most of whom lack experience or skills in modern agriculture and sustainable land-use practices.Soil erosion is a major problem, affecting 60% of the agricultural land. This is due mainly to poor agricultural practices, such as the use of livestock manure as household fuel, and the uncontrolled overgrazing of pasture lands. Grazing also takes place on forest lands, and is a major impediment to natural forest regeneration in some areas.The possibilities for effective nature protection are good, as the nature in the country is exceptionally rich and diverse. There are still areas practically undisturbed by man in the remote mountains. The advance of illegal forest harvesting is endangering the existence of the old-growth forests, especially indigenous coniferous (pine, juniper) forests.Due to its position at the meeting point of three diverse biogeographic regions and the mountainous nature of its landscape, the country sustains high biological diversity and a number of endemic species of the Caucasus. Approximately 11% of the territory is covered by forests, at altitudes from 500 to 2700 m asl, characterized by more than 200 species of trees and shrubs (Ter-Ghazaryan 1998).One fundamental problem in Armenia's forestry is that environmental impact analysis has not been carried out for methods used in logging and forest regeneration. For instance, new methods were used without any prior knowledge of their effects on the environment. Well-known examples of this are soil scarification by means of ploughing and harrowing, or use of chemicals. Non-native tree species and provenances have been introduced without first establishing what the environmental consequences would be.Natural forest ecosystems are increasingly being replaced by artificial forests, thus endangering forest genetic resources. Deciduous forests are in general replaced by conifers and marginal agricultural land is planted with fast-growing hybrid exotic poplars. Planted pines replace natural mountain oak forests. The area occupied with mixed forests is slowly declining. Virgin old-growth forest is decreasing, upon which many species of plants and animals depend.Forest roads are built without permits or adequate planning, which often results in fragmented forest landscapes. This may threaten certain species of plants and animals sensitive to such disturbance.As a result of the economic collapse, which severely affected wood processing industries, the reported contribution of the forestry sub-sector to the national economy has shrunk to less than 0.5% of GDP. In reality, forests are a source of timber, fuelwood, non-wood forest products (NWFP), game meat and recreation for a large number of people whose salary levels are inadequate for household requirements. Particularly in rural areas have forests been of great importance for people's survival and well-being during recent years. The forests represent also other environmental utilities, like greenhouse gases sequestration and carbon storage. These forest services are not included in the GDP calculations. Azerbaijan is predominantly a mountainous country. Yet, along with high mountain ridges, there are vast plains and lowlands. Eighteen per cent of the country's territory is situated below the sea level. The climate varies from subtropical and dry in central and eastern Azerbaijan to subtropical and humid in the southeast, temperate along the shores of the Caspian Sea, and cold at the higher mountain zone. Most of country receives scant rainfall (152 to 254 mm annually).A key aspect of the government's reform programme is land reform and farm restructuring. The Land Reform Law from July 1996 aimed to transfer land to private ownership.The country is rich in biodiversity. The flora is represented by 4300 species of which 240 are endemic. The fauna encountered more than 600 species of vertebrates.Fourteen state reserves with a total area of 191 200 hectares which comprise 2.2% of the total area of the Republic are in place in Azerbaijan. They include all major natural landscapes and contribute to the preservation of the biodiversity of the Caucasus. The total forest area is 1 213 700 ha, of which 989 300 ha are covered with forest. Ten percent of the forests are considered as primarily water protective, 70% as soil protective, sanitation belts 12%, and 8% as special forests.During the last six years quite large forest areas were damaged by illegal cutting. It is reported unofficially that the quantity of the trees felled is as high as 20% of the total amount of trees. Roads were built through pristine areas.Air and water pollution are widespread and pose great challenges to economic development.Major sources of pollution include oil refineries and chemical and metallurgical industries.During the Soviet era, Georgia was an important exporter of wine, tea, fruits and vegetables. Land use favoured the production of citrus, grapes, tobacco or tea in large plantations, and agroindustry accounted for about two-fifths of total industry output in Georgia.Political events and disruption of trade have seriously disturbed the balance. Agricultural production in 1995 was about half of its 1990 level. About 80% of the required food grain are imported.Despite that the energy crisis has reduced overall air pollution during the last few years, it has also made some other environmental problems more acute.In Georgia the soil erosion is one of the most serious problems. Deforestation and improper agricultural practices, in addition to its detrimental results, negatively affect the fertile soil layer. According to the last available information, about 1 million hectares (33% of total agricultural land area) were eroded during last decades. During the last seven years the amount of arable lands has been reduced by 11 000 ha due to this erosion.Saline soils are another serious problem, specifically in the eastern lowlands.Local sources of water contamination, such as the sewage system in Tbilisi, Batumi and some other main cities, many of which pour untreated into water, also cause concern. Other main pollutants of water and soil are normally agricultural activities, but due to reduction in the use of chemicals and mineral fertilizers, the situation is relatively better than before the economic crisis.The forests cover 38% of the territory of Georgia, from 500 to 2300-2500 m asl. Beech, oak, hornbeam, chestnut, ash and maple are predominant broadleaved species. Georgia's forests are rich also with coniferous species: Nordman fir, Eastern spruce and Caucasian pine. Almost all forests are located on mountainous sites.About 500 000-600 000 ha of forests are considered as not accessible, and thus completely undisturbed by man. Mean growing stock is 300 m 3 /ha.In Georgia 14 state reserves covering 168 000 ha were established with the forest as a main landscape type. Many endangered tree species are under special protection, in particular native oak species, junipers, and yew.Georgia supports a rich biodiversity that includes about 4500 species of vascular plants. Endemic plant species constitute about 9% of the total flora. Georgia is characterized by a wide variety of plant communities, with examples of almost all of the main habitat types found elsewhere in Europe.No reliable information as to the amount or distribution of illegal felling is available, although the situation can improve as the German Development Agency (GTZ) currently undertakes independent aerial observations. It is reported that the amount of registered illegal cuttings reached 50 000 m 3 in 1995, but in reality this figure could be much higher. The World Bank (WB) represents a largest donor in the entire sub-region. Its lending to Armenia is designed to help the government to accelerate the transition to the market economy and to alleviate the large pockets of poverty that have emerged over the last years.The emphasis so far was on the promotion of the private sector development and the establishment of a targeted system of social security. The WB's assistance programme aims to support Azerbaijan in its transition by providing policy advice with supporting economic and sectoral work, through adjustment and investment lending, and through aid coordination.The objective of WB's assistance to Georgia is to help reverse the economic decline of the past few years, assist the transition to a market economy, and help alleviate poverty. In addition to promoting private sector development and supporting infrastructure, the WB's assistance will also improve public management, develop human resources and institutional capacities, strengthen the social safety net, and promote regional environmental initiatives.Stemming environmental degradation in the newly independent states remains a difficult task in view of limited domestic resources. The World Bank has supported efforts to tackle this issue by helping governments to develop national environmental action plans (NEAP), which emphasize sustainable policy changes and further institution building.The financial assistance targeted to halt the degradation of the environment and forest resources in the sub-region should still be raised. At present the level of the financial support for these areas does not exceed 1% of the total WB lending. Moreover, in 1997 there were no allocations made for these areas. This hardly can coincide with the strategy of the WB, which basically should balance economic, social and environmental needs of the countries. The issue of effectiveness also must receive greater attention in terms of the focusing on the greater success areas. Partnerships should be developed with the players in areas where they have a comparative advantage.The concept of forest policy adopted at the workshop that took place in Yerevan, Armenia (May 1995) is one that aims to satisfy objectives related to environmental protection, economic and rural development, and land use. The principles upon which forest policy is based are conservation, afforestation and regeneration, sustainable and multiple use of forest resources, and maximum participation of private and non-governmental organizations in the forestry development. The last two principles represent major departures from past policy, which did not address timber production use of forests as well as non-governmental participation in forest activities.Cooperation with the UN Agencies in Azerbaijan enabled a number of international organizations to cooperate in the field of environmental protection. Negotiations have been held with UNDP, UNEP, UNESCO, the World Bank, and environmental organizations from USA, UK, Germany, Turkey, Iran and the Commonwealth of Independent States. The \"Agreement on cooperation in the field of ecology and environmental protection\" was signed between Azerbaijan and Turkey. A \"Protocol on Cooperation between the Environmental Protection Ministry of the UK and the State Committee for the Environment\" and an \"Agreement on cooperation between the British Petroleum Company and State Committee for the Environment in the field of Ecology and Environmental Protection\" are also in effect.A National Environmental Action Plan supported by the UNDP and World Bank is under preparation.The Government of Georgia prepared the National Environmental Action Plan (NEAP), which will identify priorities and set goals for environmental management, regulatory policy and related institutional development. Forestry is one of the components in this national planning activity.The reforms in the fields of forest policy and legislation are more important than ever before. The overall economic and social changes together with the increasing need for sustainable forestry development urged the countries to develop their own forest policies and legislation to meet the requirements of the market economy in a pluralistic political system.Before independence the international cooperation in the forestry sector of Armenia was planned and implemented by central institutions of the FSU. Rather strong links were maintained between Armenian and Russian forestry institutions. The Trans-Caucasus regional workshops were promoted on a periodical basis. The proceedings of such research workshops and seminars are available in Russian. Armenian foresters participated also in all-Russian symposia and conferences. On the other hand, the linkages with western partners and institutions were incomparably weak.Since 1998 the Forest Research and Experimental Centre is operating under the supervision of the Ministry of Nature Protection. The Centre coordinates activities related to the promotion of foreign cooperation and assistance, and is involved in donor relations and screening process as well as mobilization of financial support. A similar agency was established also in Georgia.Although workshops and seminars were considered as the most important means of transferring knowledge and information, the donor and recipient countries expressed concerns regarding insufficient follow-up actions.As it became evident during the transition period, the existing capacities are not able to address all problems under the new circumstances, not even those institutions which were very efficient in the previous system. Especially the institutional framework of forest management, the forestry extension service, and the statistical and information systems need to be strengthened. There is an urgent need also to design and implement the national strategy for the conservation and sustainable use of the forest and agroforestry genetic resources.The environmental and forestry development issues are one of the main elements in the entire framework of the projected development assistance to the countries in transition, and particularly to Trans-Caucasus countries. Nevertheless, multilateral agencies keep their differences while addressing the issues mentioned. In particular the WB, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) are stressing the introduction of environmentally sound approaches in the overall economic and sectoral development policies over the transitional period. The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) following its global mandate is emphasizing the capacity building programmes. The United Nations Environment Programme, the European Union/Technical Assistance to the Commonwealth of Independent States (EU/TACIS), the United Nations Education, Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO), and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) are mainly dealing with conservation and sustainable use of natural resources including forests. The International Fund for Agriculture Development (IFAD) major policy being to eradicate rural poverty and hunger at a global scale and to ensure food security, is addressing the environmental/forestry policies indirectly.The largest donor NGOs (WWF, IUCN, Ford Foundation, and Soros Foundation) are mainly stressing the objectives of nature conservation, larger involvement of communities, and sustainable and equitable use of resources.Just a few of the multilateral and bilateral donor agencies are mentioning forest development issues as their priority field of intervention. Among these are:• WB -Forest management Many funding agencies are dealing with forestry development issues indirectly, through more generalized programmes, like natural resources sustainable use, biodiversity protection, transfer of technology and know-how, etc. It is evident that the resources earmarked for the forestry development projects in this case will be considerably small.Given the considerable extent of the forest resources in the Trans-Caucasus and its potential as a contributor to the socioeconomic development in the region, and taking into consideration the vastly changed economic situation compared with FSU times, there is an urgent need for a broadly based both national and regional debate on the development of the forestry sector, leading to the formulation of national forest programmes. The latter would, inter alia, be necessary as a basis for attracting foreign participation and assistance. It would also lead to proposals for the most critical issue of the conservation and sustainable use of the forest genetic resources.According to the State Committee on Forests of the Republic of Uzbekistan, the total forest area was 8 285 300 ha (\"forest fund\" as of 1 January 1995) or approximately 19% of the country's territory. The area covered by forests was 1 945 600 ha (5%).Owing to the variety of natural conditions, several forest types are distinguished: mountain forest, desert forest, valley forest and riparian forest (called \"tugay\"). The major part of the area designated as forest fund is concentrated in deserts (6 971 300 ha) and mountains (1 185 100 ha), whilst valleys (171 100 ha) and the tugay zone (57 800 ha) harbour a smaller proportion of forests in Uzbekistan.Insufficient forest protection in the past, as well as the current absence of economic use of many forest areas, unlimited pasture and fires have led to a decrease of forest resources. Consequently, forests do not cover a significant proportion of the territory, are scattered in small areas far from settlements and mainly found in almost inaccessible places. Thus, the weakening of forest ecosystems through the loss of species or at least through the impoverishment of the genepool of their populations occur under the influence of anthropogenic factors. The situation is alarming. An urgent action is required in order to conserve the genetic potential of remnant forests in Central Asia.Priority species in the plan for conservation of biodiversity and genetic resources in the mountain forest zone are: junipers (Juniperus sp.), Persian walnut (Juglans regia), pistachio (Pistacia vera), almond (Amygdalis sp.), apple (Malus sieversii), local species of hawthorn (Crataegus sp.), maple (Acer sp.), ash (Fraxinus sp.), pear (Pyrus sp.), plum (Prunus sp.), apricot (Armeniaca vulgaris) and shrubs: barberry (Berberis sp.), rose (Rosa sp.) and commonsea buckthorn (Hippophaë rhamnoides). Juniper stands formed by three species are the basis of mountain forests.The desert forest is formed basically with two species of saxaul: white saxaul (Haloxylon persicum) and black saxaul (H. aphyllum). Other priorities for the conservation of forest genetic resources in the desert are saltworts (Salsola richteri and S. paletzkiana), calligonum (Calligonum sp.) and tamarix (Tamarix sp.).The wild white poplar (Populus alba) does not occur as native species but is widely cultivated on the territory of Uzbekistan. Black poplar (P. nigra), which is found in Central Asia at the border of its natural distribution area, is widespread. Priorities for the conservation of genetic resources in the tugay zone are Populus pruinosa and P. diversifolia. These are known under the common name \"turanga\", which forms thickets on islands and along the banks of Central Asia's rivers, penetrating deep into valleys where they grow together with psammophytes.Biological diversity and genetic variation are effectively preserved in areas specifically aimed at the conservation of genetic resources (genetic reserves), but these have not yet been designated in Uzbekistan. The total area set aside for nature protection is 2 052 000 ha or approximately 4.6% of the whole territory of the Republic and is concentrated in nine forest reserves, two national parks and a number of nature monuments.However, only 822 500 ha (1.8% of the territory) are set aside with strict or permanent type of protection attributed to IUCN categories I and II. The most strictly protected type of territory are forest reserves, which occupy 227 400 ha (nearly 0.55% of the country's territory). In Uzbekistan, which is notable for its broad range of natural conditions, the network of specifically protected areas requires expansion and completion. For instance, although the area of wild pistachio is more than 27 000 ha, no forest reserves aimed specifically at the protection of this species have been declared yet.An important role in the conservation and rational use of genetic resources is assigned to botanical gardens, which alongside with multidisciplinary studies, provide collections of native and introduced species and varieties, accumulate and save their genetic diversity. Only small part of the species' genepool, which obviously cannot represent the entire genetic variation found in the natural range of a species, is present in botanical gardens. In spite of that, botanical gardens are considered to provide good potential for the search of valuable genetic forms and varieties.At present, work on the conservation of forest genetic resources and tree improvement have been conducted basically through species introduction, plus tree selection and seed supply. Many introduced tree species are intensively used in forestry, landscape gardening and in the amenities.The tree improvement work, started in 1945, has included genetic and breeding evaluation of more than 20 tree species. These activities are carried out by the Uzbek Research Institute of Forestry, the Institute of Horticulture and Viticulture, the Tashkent Botanical Garden and the Agrarian University in Tashkent.Efforts to create and use permanent forest 'seed-breeding plots' (for the production of selected basic material) are also an important part of the conservation and use of forest genetic resources.The establishment of field trials with reproductive material derived from selected populations of different geographic origin is seen as a highly effective way to conserve and use genetic diversity of the species concerned. By observing growth performance under different site conditions, the phenotypic plasticity can be assessed, useful climatypes, ecotypes and populations most productive under local conditions identified, and the genetic collections conserved. In Uzbekistan, provenance research has started but has not been sufficiently developed because of a number of reasons. The first experiments gave promising results (e.g. the identification of Jondor form of saxaul in the Bukhara region).Genetic reserves are the most important way of conservation of forest genetic resources. Their designation has not been carried out yet in Uzbekistan, but some plans have been developed. At one time a 'breeding reserve' of Juniper zeravshanica was designated (1260 ha). There are also plus trees, plantations of their progeny (550 ha), field trials and clonal archives with genetic resources of this important species in Central Asia.Future needs and perspectives of the conservation and use of forest genetic resources are presented in the following plan: 1. To develop a status report and a plan on the designation, conservation and sustainable use of the forest genetic resources in Uzbekistan, in conjunction with the other four countries of Central Asia. 2. To develop methodological guidelines on the selection of existing plantations and assess their potential as gene reserves in order to provide suitable varieties and provenances for the entire range of natural conditions. 3. To organize field inventories, focusing on the specifically protected areas in mountain and desert forests and in the tugay, in order to prepare proposals for the designation of forest genetic reserves of the relevant tree species. 4. To revise the dendroflora in order to identify rare and threatened species, subspecies and distinct populations of forest tree species, and to reveal new provenances and unique genotypes. To develop recommendations and establish arboreta (species collections) for their conservation and use. 5. To continue genetic and breeding evaluation of native and perspective introduced forest tree species. To develop early testing for genetic characters.To develop recommendations and establish clonal archives and field collections, including provenance trials. 6. To develop methods of long-term conservation of seeds (if needed of other reproductive material) and create a seed bank to conserve valuable genotypes of forest tree species.Geographically, sub-Saharan Africa extends from the Tropic of Cancer to the Cape in South Africa. This zone can be subdivided into three main floristic regions:• The Sudano-Zambezian region with three zones • The Congo-Guinean region with two zones • The Afro-Alpine region.Little work has been done to cover these floristic regions with systematic inventories. Few inventories have been carried out and allowed each country to conduct a broad assessment of its forestry resources. The floristic abundance is only partially known. New plant species continue to be discovered and classified.For the Sahelian zone, more than 1200 species have been described up to now; 40 of these species are strictly endemic to the zone. In the Sudan zone, 2800 species have been identified. For Eastern Africa, it is the region of prevalence of endemic species with 1300 out of 2500 species endemic to the region.If inventories are easy in the dry regions, they become more difficult in the humid zone owing to the abundance of plant species, resulting in the closure of the forest cover. Data available on total plant species are approximate and should be analyzed with care. Nevertheless, timber tree species are better known. In the Guinean and Congo zones of Cameroon, 600 timber tree species can be counted, while Gabon counts on its territory more than 200 timber tree species.The Sahelian zone is characterized by an abundance of spiny plant species of the genus Acacia. Many Combretaceae can also be found (Combretum spp., Guierea senegalensis and Piliostigma reticulatum).The Sudan zone is a woody savannah. Less homogeneous plant communities composed of Combretaceae (Anogeissus leiocarpus), Sapotaceae (Butyrospermum parkii) and Meliaceae (Khaya senegalensis) replace Acacia.The Zambezian zone is an open forest dominated by the genera Brachysteria, Isoberlinia, Baikiaea, Burkea and Crytosepalum.The Congo zone is a semi-deciduous dense forest, dominated by Entandrophragma spp., Khaya ivorensis, Triplochiton scleroxylon (Ayous), Terminalia superba (Frake).The Guinean zone is a humid evergreen dense forest rich in Cesalpiniaceae, (Mimosaceae, Fabaceae) and Ochnaceae. The most frequent genera are Afzelia, Berlinia, Gilbertiodendron, Lophira and Pycnanthus.In the Afro-Alpine zone, up to 2000 m altitude, the flora is similar to that of the neighbouring plain. Above 2000 m the vegetation is composed of many Gymnosperm species such as Podocarpus and Juniperus.Forest products have multipurpose uses including firewood, timber, food products, medicinal products and fodder products. Some species serve a great number of purposes; others have a very specific utilization.With a few exceptions most of the species are used as firewood. In Africa, firewood satisfies 80% of energy requirements. The quantity of wood needed as energy source is estimated at 1 m 3 /person/year. This represents an annual consumption of about 472 million m 3 of wood.Although the volume of logged trees remains lower than what has been observed in Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean, there is an increasing trend not only of the area, but also of the volume exploited, even more so after the devaluation of the CFA Franc in 1994. In fact, this volume (FAO 1995) was still below 20 million cubic meters between 1986 and 1990 with an increasing rate around 1 million cubic meters/ha/year. We should note the particularity of logging practices used in Africa. It consists of the selection in a given country of less than 100 commercialized tree species according to the international market. The choice of the tree species to be felled on the list of 100 depends on the market demand. All exploitation of timber tree species can be based on a very low number of tree species, which are sometimes exploited right to extinction.Wood is also used as material for construction. Even though the exploited volume is low, the logs selected are those with a diameter comprised between 10-40 cm. This could represent a handicap for the regeneration of the selected species.The forest provides not only directly consumable products for the population, but it is also a reserve of land for agriculture (food crop and cash crop cultivation).Fruit consumption could be a threat for regeneration of some species such as Irvingia gabonensis, Baillonella toxisperma, Tamarindus indica, Balanites aegyptiaca and Annona senegalensis. The fruits of these species are consumed and commercialized.Distinction should be made between herbaceous and woody forage. The daily need to feed a Tropical Animal Unit (cow 250 kg in weight) is around 6.25 kg dry matter. The pastoral area in Sudan and Sahelian zones of Cameroon with 7 million ha was supporting 160 000 cattle in 1974 (USAID 1974). We have noticed that the animals appreciate more than 60 tree species, such as Stereospernum kuntianum, Combretum aculeatum, Ficus spp. The impact of animals on the flora is double: the consumption of flowers, fruits, leaves and tree bark but also destruction of the herbaceous cover.The economic crisis and above all the devaluation of the CFA franc have doubled the price of pharmaceutical products. This has brought about a desertion of chemist shops and an increase in the market of traditional medicines from plants. Unfortunately, this exploitation is not carried out according to the regulations. There is no control; the trees are victims of mutilations, which can lead to their death. This is the case with Garcinia lucida, Khaya senegalensis, etc.We can distinguish two important threats: climatic disturbances and human practices.The interannual variation curve for rainfall (Catinot 1988) shows that the zone faced dry periods during the beginning of the 1970s and mainly in the 1980s. A consequence of these droughts was the modification of the Poaceae composition. The perennial species (Andropogon gayanus) were replaced with a vegetation of mixed composition with occurrence of annual species such as Cenchrus biflorus and Sida cordifolia. As for tree species, their resistance to these successive drought periods varied from one species to another. Chad has observed considerable losses due to the dry spell on its Acacia senegalensis, Anogeissus leiocarpus and Khaya senegalensis populations. But it is above all the combined effect of drought and human practices which is the principal cause of the high mortality either of some individuals of a given species or of entire populations. Sometimes the entire ecosystem is lost. It was estimated that in countries like Cameroon and Senegal the annual rate of disappearance of the dry savannah is 100 000 ha. The species concerned are Acacia nilotica, Acacia senegalensis, Pterocarpus lucens, Sclerocarya birrea, Prosopis africana, Lannea microcarpa and Dalbergia melanoxylon. Edaphic dryness adds to the effect of climatic drought, due to the increase of salt concentration in the soil. This is the case with \"tannes\" or salty soils in Senegal and also with \"hardés\" sterile soils in Cameroon. The combination of dryness and saltiness of the soil has brought about the disappearance in Senegal of the Cayor Hyphaene thebaica plantation and of some oil palm plantations in Casamance.Logging FAO (1995) estimated that between 1981 and 1990 all the concerned regions in Africa lost 4.1 million ha of their forest area. This represents an annual regression estimated at 0.7%. The loss of forest area has induced a loss of 2% timber species.It has been estimated that 480 000 out of 1.8 million km 2 of the Guinean area are composed of fallow lands more or less covered with forests (FAO 1995). Around 40% of the forest area have been converted into agricultural lands between 1981 and 1990.In 1974 Cameroon had 160 000 cattle with 7 million ha of pasture lands. Today the number of cattle has been multiplied by 8, with around the same grazing area (6.5 million ha) (Donfack 1998). We can easily imagine the impact on the species.Experimental observations on the semi-deciduous forest of Côte d'Ivoire have shown that the number of species decreased from 117 to 20 after 50 years of yearly burning of the forest during the dry season.This practice can have a direct and indirect impact on the species concerned:• Direct impact with extraction of reproductive parts (flowers, fruits and seeds). It concerns mostly Acacia species of which the flowers and fruits are eaten by animals. The seeds of Khaya senegalensis, Parkia biglobosa, Vitellaria parkii and Baillonnella toxisperma are used for oil production for various purposes. Fruits of Sclerocarya birrea, Ximenia americana, Coula edulis are consumed by humans. The fruits of Acacia nilotica are used as tannin for leather. • Indirect impact concerns the extraction of non-reproductive parts (leaves, roots, cambium), which has an impact on the flowering and/or fructification of the individual tree.In situ conservation The first step in a conservation strategy adopted by most countries was to designate forest lands as permanent forests. The majority of the states adopted that 30% of the national territory should be classified as permanent forests. There are several types of classified forests; the two main types are (i) protected areas for wildlife and (ii) forest reserves. FAO (1995) mentions that at the end of 1990, African countries had designated 84.2 million ha as permanent forests (for logging and protected forests). This represents 3.8% of the land area.The second step has consisted of enhancement through planting of some forest reserves impoverished by logging activities. These plantations have brought out the development of a seed production and conservation technology.The third step in the strategy developed by African countries concerns tree plantations, gene conservation as seeds or in vitro conservation. In 1990, the rate of tree plantations in African countries was 90 000 ha per year (FAO 1995).The conservation plots and arboreta established concerned mainly exotic species. The same situation is found with genetic improvement programmes focusing on Eucalyptus and Pinus species, for which many provenance trials have been conducted.Except for a few inventory activities, very little research work has been carried out on intraspecific diversity. The few existing studies concern Parkia biglobosa and Acacia albida. The cost of molecular and isoenzyme analyses is a limiting factor.The International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO) guidelines provide that by the year 2000, all commercialized timber from member countries should come from managed forests.If we should praise the fact that forest management plans, mostly for productive forests, ensure sustainable forest production at a certain level, it should be underlined that this framework could be improved by integrating considerations for the conservation of intraspecific variability, such as the critical threshold (minimum number of individuals for a given population of tree species). Such notions should be taken into consideration, if the data are available at least for a certain number of important tree species. A good knowledge of the forest genetic diversity is indispensable.The collaboration among African countries should start with the harmonization of forestry laws. All countries have not yet formulated their laws so that they take into account treaties or international conventions, whereas these treaties and conventions have not yet been ratified by all African countries.Regional and sub-regional cooperation is carried out through a number of projects, organizations and institutions. The cooperative mechanisms mostly group the countries situated in the same geographical region. The Organization of African Unity regroups all African countries. Sub-regional mechanisms include: Apart from these organizations at the policy level, there are also technical networks. For example IGAD for East Africa, CILSS for the Sahelian countries, the Sahara and Sahel Observatory, the Neem (Azadirachta indica) Network, the Fallow Network for west African countries. The sub-Saharan Africa Forest Genetic Resources Programme (SAFORGEN) networks are under establishment.Many meetings of the specialists responsible for forest resources have been held in the past. They mainly concern forest management in general rather than forest genetic resources in particular. Two meetings on forest genetic resources took place in Ouagadougou in March and September 1998.The objective of the workshop held in March 1998, organized by IPGRI in collaboration with FAO, the Danida Forest Seed Centre and CIRAD-Forêt, was to provide training for participants from west and central African countries and Madagascar on forest genetic resources. This workshop brought together 54 participants from 19 countries and 3 subregional and international organizations. The main conclusions of this meeting were:• To continue the joint efforts for increasing opportunities to train African scientists in the area of forest genetic resources. Training courses should be organized on the basis of modules with practical sessions • To make operational the SAFORGEN Programme which should play an important role for the collaboration among African countries • The participants recommended that SAFORGEN start with three networks: forest fruit species, fodder species, timber species and non-timber forest species. A list of priority species has been established (Ouédraogo and Boffa 1999).The meeting held in September 1998 was organized by FAO in collaboration with IPGRI and ICRAF. It brought together 35 participants representing 15 countries and 6 international agencies for regional and bilateral cooperation. The objective of the meeting was to elaborate under FAO aegis a Sub-regional Plan of Action for conservation, management, sustainable use and enhancement of forest genetic resources in the Sahelian and North Sudan zones.It was agreed to define priorities and to undertake collaborative actions within the countries on the basis of the priorities established. IPGRI in general and the new SAFORGEN Programme in particular were requested to ensure the follow-up of these recommendations and also to serve as a platform for overall coordination of activities in order to achieve the objectives.Europe can bring its support to the development of sustainable management practices for genetic resources of African forests. The top priority areas of collaboration are as follows:• Training of researchers and technicians: group training (seminars and workshops) as well as individual training (schools and laboratories) • Technical assistance: this can be done within joint projects where transfer of technology is a major componentThe breadth of the topic, scarcity and clumped distribution of available information, and subjectivity of both the terms 'status' and 'collaboration' combine to make this paper a challenge. In the absence of complete and objective information, the author attempts to:1. Offer some information on the conditions (e.g. biological, social, political) that underlie the genetic diversity and status of forest tree species in Canada, Mexico, and the United States. 2. Comment on some of the issues concerning genetic diversity and provide a few case studies to illuminate linkages between genetic conservation and political/biological conditions. 3. Offer possibilities for collaboration with EUFORGEN and European countries in general, on a country-by-country (within North America) basis. 4. Review some of the (most relevant to EUFORGEN) recommendations from a North American workshop held in 1995 that focused on the genetic status of North American temperate forest tree species. This is not a comprehensive report on the status of forest genetic resources in North America. Much of the information for this report, unless otherwise referenced, is drawn from a report based on a workshop with a similar theme -The Status of North American Temperate Forest Genetic Resources -held in Berkeley, California in 1995 (Rogers and Ledig 1996). Note that for both that publication and this report, there is a disproportionate amount of information available for Canada and the USA.Containing over 416 million hectares of forest land -10% of the world's forests -Canada has considerable forest genetic resources. The socioeconomic impacts of these resources are significant: over 120 million hectares are currently managed for timber production. Conservation is a concern, with over 50 million hectares (12%) protected from harvesting by policy or legislation (Mosseler 1995). Of the 135 native forest tree species, 31 are coniferous and 104 deciduous. In general there are few boreal species ( 24), but these tend to be widespread. Towards the south, the number of species (temperate) increases. Forest regions in Canada are generally organized as boreal, subalpine, montane, temperate, and grassland (Rowe 1972).The historical patterns of settlement were generally south to north, and east to west, with colonization in the 17th century beginning on the east coast and quickly extending into Quebec and Ontario, accessible through the Great Lakes -St. Lawrence system. Most forest land is owned by provincial governments (71%) and recently many provincial governments have been reducing their staff, in some cases dramatically. Federal and territorial ownership covers 23% of the forest land, with only 6% in private ownership (Natural Resources Canada 1998). These patterns of forest land ownership are not consistent from province to province. For example, there is no private forest in the Yukon or Northwest Territories and the eastern (Maritime) provinces have the highest concentration of private forests (where 'private forests' refer both to company and individual holdings).In terms of species endangerment (i.e., listed as threatened, vulnerable, or endangered), the country's forest genetic resources are not in crisis: as of 1995, only six species were listed (Table 1). All are temperate-zone species. The reason for their listing status varies from hybridization with exotics to the Canadian populations being the northern limits of the species' range, but mostly due to loss of habitat or fragmentation. Vulnerable 1985 Only three populations are known in Canada, all in southern Ontario. 1 The list includes all woody species. The last two species on the list are often considered to be shrubs. 2 En dangered = a s pecies f acing i mminent extirpation or extinction. Threatened = a s pecies likely to b ecome endangered i f li miting factors are n ot re versed. V ulnerable = a s pecies of s pecial c oncern b ecause o f characteristics that make it particularly sensitive to human activities or natural events. It includes any indigenous species of fauna or flora that is particularly at risk because of low or declining numbers, occurrence at the fringe of its range or in restricted areas, or for some other reason, but is not a threatened species. (This category includes species that had previously been designated as rare. The rare designation was abolished by COSEWIC in 1990). 3 Date of designation by COSEWIC.However, loss of the entire species is at the extreme end of the spectrum of genetic depletion. Other lesser but significant genetic consequences for these species are not well known. For example, the widely occurring boreal gymnosperms are seemingly well buffered from consequences due to their expansive ranges and northern distributions (i.e., in relatively undeveloped areas). However, many of these species have been under forest management for some time so the genetic consequences from forest practices -including harvesting and replanting practices -while not well understood, may be substantial.Southern deciduous species may be more at risk due to settlement patterns. Early agricultural settlement and more recent urban and industrial development have led to loss of habitat and most likely accompanying loss of genetic diversity. Examples of species that have suffered large habitat losses are sugar maple (Acer saccharum -the national symbol) and black walnut (Juglans nigra).In recognition of the possible genetic impacts on even widely distributed forest tree species, in view of the scarcity of data, and in consideration of the need to set priorities for genetic conservation due to limited financial and human resources, forest genetic professionals in the province of British Columbia set out to establish a ranking system to identify their forest tree species of greatest genetic conservation concern. Their criteria include natural distribution of the species (e.g. widespread versus narrow), capacity of the species for natural regeneration, status of provenance testing, representation in ex situ and in situ reserves, etc. (Yanchuk and Lester 1996).In Ontario, the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) -the government agency charged with managing much of that province's public forest land -was taken to court by a coalition of environmental groups, charged with mismanagement of forest resources. The environmental coalition won the case and the OMNR has been instructed to prepare a new plan for managing natural resources. However, dramatic downsizing of public employees over recent years has left the agency with a little flexibility to rise to these new challenges. Thus, forest genetic resources in Ontario and elsewhere are susceptible to threats from loss of appropriate professionals to plan for their conservation, from discontinuity in political administrations, and to changing priorities.Aboriginal issues may play an increasing role in the management of Canada's forests. Recently, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled on an historic Aboriginal land claim in British Columbia, where it found that Aboriginal title to land exists where a First Nation occupied lands before the Crown (federal government) asserted sovereignty (Natural Resources Canada 1998). Most of the forest land of British Columbia is subject to similar claims, leaving much uncertainty about the future responsibility for and actions towards genetic conservation of forest tree species in that province.Canadian forestry professionals are proud of their commitment to sustainable forests that predates the Rio Earth Summit in 1992. Since then, the Canadian Council of Forest Ministries has accepted a criteria and indicators framework -including six criteria, one of which is conservation of biological diversity of which genetic diversity is one element (Fig. 1).1. Genetic status of forest tree species is strongly influenced by the east-to-west, and southto-north pattern of settlement, resulting in loss of habitat and fragmentation effects for many of the southern and eastern angiosperms, and as yet unknown or poorly understood forest management effects on the more northern and widely occurring boreal species.2. Strong influence of land ownership on opportunities for collaboration in genetic conservation: a) Federal government (e.g. Canadian Forest Service of Natural Resources Canada) owns and manages relatively little forest land. It plays mainly roles of research, coordination of national strategies among the provinces, trying to encourage national standards and collaboration through funding and other incentives and some direct seed inventory and ex situ conservation activities (e.g. National Tree Seed Centers). Thus, European countries can request seed from nationally-controlled collections. There are some forested areas in nationally administered parks (Parks Canada). b) Although strong provincial ownership of forest genetic resources makes it difficult to have national-level standards or conservation plans, ironically this situation may lead to a strength in conservation planning. The reasoning here is that, for example, a widely occurring species would experience different environmental and management impacts across its range (i.e., differences in ownership and management may result in a diversified conservation approach, lower risk.). And the dominance of (provincial) government ownership should facilitate development of genetic conservation plans at provincial level (i.e., relative to a situation with more diverse and private ownership). There are approximately 800 forest tree species in the United States. The forest landbase falls under a diverse range of ownership (many federal and state agencies -e.g. the National Park Service and the National Forest Service; non-profit organizations -e.g. The Nature Conservancy; industrial -e.g. Weyerhaeuser Corporation; and private ownership). The diversity in ownership and management underlies the difficulty in compiling similarly structured statistics to comprehensively present the status of forest genetic resources. Geographic distribution of the forest resources at the species level is well known: genetic diversity of the resources is imperfectly known. Amounts and patterns of genetic variation have been outlined for many species; nevertheless, genetic diversity of most taxa is imperfectly known and the impacts of anthropogenic influences are not well understood (Rogers and Ledig 1996).As in Canada, the east-to-west historical settlement pattern in the United States has consequences for the status of forest tree species. For example, National Forests and Parks cover much more land in the western than in the eastern United States (Fig. 2). Thus, species with western distributions are more likely to be represented on federal lands with some conservation conditions than are eastern species. Not only were forested areas converted to agriculture and other types of development early in the country's history, lessening the opportunity for such forest reserves, but also this intensive and early impact is now reflected in other threats to remaining forests. The threats that are particularly evident in the east include decline due to exotic insects and diseases (e.g. chestnut blight affecting American chestnut, blister rust affecting white pine, gypsy moth affecting many hardwood species, Dutch elm disease affecting elms, and more recently, the Asian long-horned beetle affecting maples and other hardwoods); direct loss of habitat and potential genetic consequences from fragmented populations; changes in disturbance patterns (e.g. impacts on natural drainage systems and natural fire disturbance); and cumulative impacts from many human-caused and natural threats (e.g. 'northern hardwood decline' in the Southern Appalachian Mountains where beech/birch/maple forests are suffering mortality that may be linked to demographic factors, Armillaria root disease, pollution, drought stress, etc.) (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Web site information).In the west, exotic invasions are also a serious problem for forest tree species. For example, Miconia (Miconia calvenscens) is an invasive tree species now found on four of the five main Hawaiian Islands. Estimates of its coverage suggest it now dominates two-thirds of the forest canopy on these islands, competing with native species (USDA Forest Service, Web site information). As in Canada, there are few forest tree species that are in danger of extinction in the near future: seven species are listed (federally, according to the Endangered Species Act). Consistent with the earlier statements about historical patterns of development, most of these species are located in the east (Table 2). The term Threatened species me ans a ny species which is lik ely to become an e ndangered s pecies wi thin t he foreseeable f uture throughout all or a significant portion of its range.\" \"The term species includes any subspecies of fish or wildlife or plants, and any distinct po pulation s egment of any species of v ertebrate fish or wildlife which in terbreeds w hen ma ture\" (Endangered Species Act of 1973).We do not know the genetic status of most species, but there are reasons for concern, even in what might be considered the 'less affected' species in the western part of the country. Three case studies presented below give examples of the types of issues that are arising with western US species.Giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum): traditionally an important timber species, giant Sequoia is increasingly valued for non-consumptive purposes -recreation, aesthetic purposes, and spiritual rejuvenation. Approximately 90% of the current natural distribution of the species is under public ownership and approximately 53% of the current giant sequoia area has been continuously protected from logging and has been managed within a policy context of fire suppression for the last century (Stephenson 1996). Due at least in part to the fire suppression policy, these groves now have an unnatural age structure, with lower natural regeneration and fewer trees in the 1-100 year category, than expected under natural conditions. A recent pilot study of genetic diversity and structure within two groves shows a correlation between age class (as represented by diameter class) and genetic structure, suggesting that this practice of fire suppression may indeed have had genetic consequences regardless of the attempt to 'protect' the habitat (Rogers 1999, unpublished report for the USDA Forest Service). This is one example of how management policies and management of natural disturbances, in particular, can be manifest as genetic consequences.Whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis): this subalpine coniferous species has a wide-ranging and sometimes disjunct occurrence in the western United States and Canada. Fire disturbance is a natural component in many parts of its range, and this species, too, may be negatively affected by fire-suppression policies as well as decline from mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) and introduced white pine blister rust (Cronartium ribicola) (Tomback et al. 1993). However, fire suppression and other management practices may have as yet undocumented genetic impacts. In particular, we know little about fine-scale genetic structure in many western conifers that have been studied at regional levels and hence have not fully explored management impacts at this level. In a recent study, the fine-scale genetic structure of whitebark pine was investigated at nested geographic levels from watershed to adjacent stems in the eastern Sierra Nevada Range of California (Rogers et al. 1999). Characteristics of whitebark pine that may be related to its fine-scale genetic structure include wingless, bird-dispersed seeds; having the reputed capacity to reproduce vegetatively; and forming distinct growth morphologies at different elevations in this part of its natural range. Genetic differentiation, as measured with 21 allozyme loci, between upperelevation prostrate krummholz thickets and lower-elevation upright tree clump growth forms was modest (F st =0.051). Much stronger differentiation was measured among the individual thickets and clumps within their sample sites (F st =0.334). Genetic structure is apparently profoundly influenced by the seed-caching behaviour of Clark's nutcracker (Nucifraga columbiana). Western (US) pine species typically show little among-population differentiation and high levels of within-population genetic variation. In whitebark pine in the eastern Sierra Nevada of California, genetic variation is highly structured, especially within the natural groupings -krummholz thickets and upright tree clumps. Management impacts on this level of genetic structure -for this or other forest tree species -are not yet understood.Monterey pine (Pinus radiata): highly valued in other countries as a commercial species, growing on over 4 million hectares of plantations worldwide, Monterey pine is not, nevertheless, grown domestically for commercial purposes except, for example, to a modest extent in Christmas tree plantations. This species has a very restricted natural range along the central coast of California and on two small Mexican islands. It is valued domestically more in terms of its aesthetic and symbolic value, enhancing expensive real estate along the central California coast and defining small remaining forested areas in a region with high levels of development, high per-capita incomes, and high levels of environmental activism.This pine has suffered from recent and dramatic impacts from pitch canker disease, a fungal (Fusarium subglutinans f. sp. pini) disease vectored by an insect that was introduced to California over a decade ago. This disease has triggered local concern, not only because it may potentially impact the more widely occurring native pines, but also because the mortality is in rather scenic and wealthy areas of California. The disease and subsequent mortality in Monterey pine have also triggered international concern because of the threat to native Monterey pine genepools. A pitch canker task force -involving state and federal government agencies, non-profit environmental groups, researchers and others -was organized to help determine strategies to control the disease and deal with related issues. Internationally, the concern over native genepools and potential impacts for exotic plantations of the species has resulted in a major international workshop (November, 1998 in Monterey, California). It was hosted and organized by research and industry collaborators (Australia, New Zealand, Chile, United States) to discuss the current understanding of the disease and to develop a broad-scale initiative to establish Monterey pine field trial in California to provide a means of selecting resistant genotypes and further studying the disease.There is no genetic conservation plan for Monterey pine at present. However, funds associated with a State Senate Bill that was shepherded by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (among others) to fight the disease, have been earmarked for the development of such a plan. The genetic conservation plan will be coordinated by the Genetic Resources Program of the University of California and will receive input from university scholars (genetics, paleohistory, ecology, etc.), state and federal agencies, nonprofit organizations, related industry researchers and others. Thus, although there is no genetic conservation plan in place for this (or any other) California forest tree species, the combination of a threatening introduced disease and the species' various social and ecosystem values have provided the will and means by which to prepare one in the near future. Unfortunately, reactionary plans may have fewer opportunities for genetic conservation than proactive plans.One additional concern related to the status (and future health) of forest genetic resources in the US is erosion of the infrastructure for educating forest geneticists. For example, at the University of California at Berkeley -once one of the top forestry schools in the countrythere is no longer a forest geneticist on faculty and forest genetics courses are no longer taught (and have not been for the past five years). Increasingly, 'forest genetics' is disappearing from university curricula. Other disciplines and degree programmes, including conservation biology and restoration ecology, may provide some of the education needed for conservation management of forest genetic resources but are not likely to provide all of the insight and educated foresight needed to wisely manage these resources in the long term.1. Unlike Canada, there are significant forest lands and forest reserves under federal ownership and management here (e.g. National Park Service and National Forest Service) so direct collaboration on a national level is possible.2. For many of the forest tree species, there is little or no genetic information. Genetic information is concentrated on the commercial species and the rare/endangered species. Effects of forest management activities are presumed but not well understood, and impacts at the level of fine-scale genetic structure are even less well known. Speciesbased and range-wide genetic conservation plans are virtually unknown.3. Reduced budgets for research and reduced educational opportunities in forest genetics specifically may have impacts on how genetic diversity is recognized, valued, and managed in the long term.Mexico is rich in forest tree species diversity -with perhaps 2000 to 3000 species in temperate and tropical zones -and in intraspecific genetic variation. For example, nearly half of the extant species of pine are native to Mexico. Little genetic information is available for these species: in most cases even distribution maps are incomplete. Most genetic reserves are maintained by federal or state agencies and by universities and research institutions.Approximately 160 forest tree species are considered rare and endangered. Some species and populations have become increasingly threatened in recent decades from population growth and economic pressures that involve land conversion, habitat degradation, population fragmentation, and dysgenic selection. In natural areas, there is evidence of fragmentation and reduction in population sizes of several endemic forest species such as spruce species, Gregg pine (Pinus greggii), Chihuahua pine (Pinus leiophylla), Maximino pine (Pinus maximinoi) Chiapas white pine (Pinus chiapensis), Mexican weeping pine (Pinus patula), Apache pine (Pinus engelmannii), etc. Loss of habitat is a severe threat -particularly for Chihuahua pine, Pseudotsuga species, and Chiapas white pine. In 1995, it was estimated that approximately 0.65% of the temperate forest area was converted to some other land use annually. Other threats to genetic integrity, in increasing order of importance, are pathogens, insects, and selective removal of trees. Recently, a problem has emerged with an introduced pest (wood borer) in exotic poplars which may spread to Mexico's native poplars. National parks and other large reserves at present cover most of the major forest ecosystems throughout Mexico, and there are policies on protection of native, endemic forest species in natural forests, particularly for those at high risk of loss. These policies are established at both the federal and state level. Several thousand hectares are designated as 'conservation areas', in addition to the traditional national parks or other large reserves (i.e., Biosphere Reserves). Conservation areas are scattered throughout natural forests to protect rare, threatened, or endangered species and some unique populations. Harvesting is forbidden in these conservation areas, but seed collections are permitted for valid research or ex situ conservation activities. However, most of these areas are still vulnerable to natural (destructive) disturbances as well as human encroachment and may not be large enough to maintain viable populations in the long term (Rogers and Ledig 1996).Anthropogenic pressures, leading to habitat loss and population fragmentation and degradation, are large and increasing. The delineation of conservation areas is recent, and it is unknown whether the current areas are adequate to protect the genetic integrity of populations or whether they can be enforced. Political unrest and insufficient funding for conservation and research activities further undermine the infrastructure for genetic research and conservation. The lack of information -even species level diversity is not well studiedis of particular concern, leading to a recommendation at the (1995) workshop to give research priority to Mexico (see recommendation number 5, below). Some information on the status of forest genetic resources in the tropical states of Campeche, Veracruz, and Yucatan is available from the FAO.The following is a list of consensus recommendations developed by the participants in the Workshop on North American Temperate Forest Genetic Resources, Berkeley, California 12-14 June, 1995 (Rogers and Ledig 1996). These address both the genetic status of forest genetic resources as well as, in some cases, the opportunities for and interests in collaboration with other countries outside of North America.1. We recommend the development of national programmes to address issues in the conservation of forest genetic resources. Due to the complexity of land ownership patterns and land management objectives within and among Canada, Mexico, and the United States of America, coordination on the national level is necessary. All of those directly involved with forest land ownership and/or management should be actively involved with the national programme -contributing to databases, participating in conservation planning, and implementing action plans for conservation of forest genetic resources. These programmes should include the exploration, inventory, documentation, and monitoring of forest genetic resources, both in situ and ex situ. Both exotic forest tree species growing in North America and native North American species growing elsewhere should be considered in national programmes. Furthermore, because species cross national borders, coordination and cooperation among nations will be required.2. We recommend that conservation of forest genetic resources be addressed by multiple approaches, and that, whenever possible, they should include ecosystem reserves. We recognize, that for non-commercial species, ecosystem reserves may be the only economically practical method of conservation. We recognize that while biotechnology can be useful in many ways, it is not a substitute for an adequately funded, field-oriented genetic conservation programme.3. Recognizing that many North American temperate forest tree species are important plantation species on this and other continents, and that it may be necessary to draw upon these forest genetic resources in the future, we recommend that Canada, Mexico, and the United States conserve these resources in situ. We assume that other countries outside North America will reciprocate with regard to their native genetic resources.4. We recommend an increase in funding for research on conservation of forest genetic resources. This research should involve, when appropriate, interdisciplinary, interagency, and international collaboration. Some (non-prioritized) examples of research needs are: a) Exploration and inventory of species' distributions and patterns of spatial genetic structure within species. b) Development of more efficient methods of evaluating genetic variation for adaptive traits. c) Evaluation of the relative utility of various types of genetic data in the development of sampling strategies for conservation. d) Analysis of the impacts of sociopolitical structures on the effectiveness of programmes for the conservation of genetic resources. e) Analysis of factors influencing population viability. f) Analysis of the effects of habitat fragmentation, forest management practices, and environmental change on genetic resources.Recognizing the high level of species and genetic diversity in Mexico and the extreme lack of information on this resource, we recommend that research on Mexican tree species should receive special attention.6. Recognizing that forest management practices may have positive or negative impacts on genetic diversity and population viability and, in fact, that some form of management will be necessary to maintain genetic resources, we recommend a research emphasis on the consequences of forest management practices. We encourage the use of reference populations within long-term ecological research sites, 'model forests', and research natural areas for studies on the effects of forest management.7. We recommend that the FAO encourage the development of a centralized metadatabase of genetic resources. We see this as composed of local databases, coordinated through a network and designed to facilitate exchange within the international community.8. We recommend that member countries request FAO, through their Regional Forestry Commissions, to promote and coordinate national forest genetic resource conservation programmes, and their integration into forestry practices. 9. Recognizing that private sector owners and managers play an important role in in situ conservation of forest genetic resources, we recommend that the FAO and conservation agencies explore a range of incentives and agreements (e.g. tax incentives, easements, and land trusts) to foster conservation of forest genetic resources by the private sector.10. Recognizing that effective genetic conservation programmes are very long-term in nature, we recommend that the FAO encourage and assist in the education of natural resource professionals and the lay public to foster a conservation ethic.11. Recognizing that species introductions affect native ecosystems and local cultures and economies, we recommend the development of guidelines for the introduction of species. These guidelines should include general procedures for conducting risk analyses for biological, social, and economic factors as well as general procedures for monitoring the species after introduction.12. Recognizing the importance of the Convention on Biological Diversity, the benefits of unrestricted exchange of germplasm, and the distinction between forest genetic resources and those of domesticated crops, we recommend that the forest genetic community provide leadership in addressing the emerging issues of intellectual property rights, indigenous peoples' rights, and plant breeders' rights as they pertain to forest genetic resources.In summary:• We do not have comprehensive genetic information for most of the forest tree species in North America. This information is disproportionately available for commercial species, often conifers. • In Canada and USA, the threat -for the majority of forest tree species -is not of extinction, but genetic consequences from continuing and accumulative impacts from forest management activities and other human land-use activities that fragment or potentially degrade the genepool.• Also of concern in these two countries is loss of infrastructure and funding for forest genetics education and research.• In Mexico, the threat of extinction is greater. There is not even basic information on all species and their distribution. Other significant genetic effects can be anticipated due to continued large-scale loss of habitat.• The opportunities for collaboration with Europe differ among these three countries, due to differences in political structures and forest ownership, for example. Funding for research and conservation activities is needed in Mexico. Opportunities for collaboration with North American countries are perhaps most obvious for species that are native here and grown as exotics in Europe (e.g. Pinus radiata, Robinia pseudoacacia, Pseudotsuga menziesii) or vice versa (e.g. Pinus sylvestris, Juglans regia, Populus nigra). Here, the mutual concerns over genetic conservation are obvious. Other opportunities for collaboration, already well demonstrated by much experience, include sabbaticals across the Atlantic, training and development in genetic conservation, and collaborative research. The need to strengthen efforts on the conservation of forest genetic resources 2 in European countries was recognized during the late 1980s, when a number of countries developed and started to implement national strategies to specifically address these issues as part of their forest management programmes. The principal concern requiring a better conservation of the genetic resources of forest tree species within their distribution areas has been the forest decline attributed to rapid environmental changes. Threats leading to the loss of genetic diversity in European forests have been identified as transboundary atmospheric pollution and intensive forest management, including the replacement of mixed forest stands with monocultures, fragmentation, loss of local ecotypes, artificial selection and uncontrolled movement of reproductive material. Despite that the risk of the actual loss of species is low, these threats to genetic diversity within species became very urgent. Conservation and sustainable use of genetic resources has also gained attention due to the genetic potential of forests to meet the increasing demands for high-quality timber and other forest products and to provide environmental and social benefits. European forests share the influence of similar traditions in silviculture and overall forest management. These provide a common basis for jointly incorporating genetic resources concerns into forestry practice.The call for increased international collaboration and coordination of efforts in this area was realized through the adoption of Resolution S2. The representatives of 31 signatory countries made a commitment towards further development and implementation of their national strategies. They also decided to follow a concerted policy for the conservation of genetic resources and to establish an international monitoring structure.\"…a functional but voluntary ins trument of international c ooperation should be f ound among existing r elevant organizations, in o rder to promote and c oordinate (i) in sit u a nd ex s itu methods to conserve the genetic diversity, (ii) exchange o f reproductive materials and (iii) monitoring of progress in those fields…\"This international commitment was reconfirmed at the Second Ministerial Conference (Helsinki, 1993) where four further Resolutions with components relevant to genetic resources and their conservation were agreed. Within the follow-up to Resolution H1 4 it was, for example, proposed that one of the Indicators of sustainable forest management be the proportion of stands managed for the conservation and use of genetic resources. Resolution H4 focuses partly on research into the genetic effects of global climatic change on forest tree populations.The European Forest Genetic Resources Programme (EUFORGEN) was endorsed at the Second Ministerial Conference in Helsinki as the instrument of international cooperation for implementing Resolution S2 (Arbez 1994 5 ). Its development and overall management has been undertaken by IPGRI 6 in collaboration with the FAO Forestry Department 7 . The Programme aims at ensuring the conservation and the sustainable use of forest genetic resources in Europe. It became fully operational in October 1994. international agricultural research centers of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research. 7 Food and Agriculture Organization as the United Nations agency entrusted by the world community to deal with issues on food and agriculture including and forestry and forest resources.Prior to esta blishing EUFORGEN, the S2 Follow-up Committee (composed of France, Finland, Poland an d Portugal) c onducted an inte rnational surv ey on the status of for est gene tic resources in Europe and prepared the basis for collaboration in networks. Following the results of the survey (Arbez 1994), fou r 'pilot' networks were established to focus on a selected set of species. These not only reflected national priorities for the conservation of the most threatened genetic div ersity (Fig. 1 ) and it s actual or potential u se, b ut it a lso c overed different types of ecogeographic and gen etic d istribution p atterns. Th e n etworks init ially selected were: Picea abies (Norway spruce -a wind-pollinated, widely distributed and intensively managed conifer), Quercus suber (cork oak -a valuable species in southern Europe, with diversity under threat), Populus ni gra (b lack poplar -a characteristic ri parian s pecies with sp ontaneous in terspecific hybridization) and Noble Har dwoods, a group of 'overlooked' species with scattered distribution patterns and high-quality timber. EUFORGEN is financed by participating countries and the coordinating secretariat is hosted by IPGRI. The Programme is operated as a multilateral trust fund which functions through individual Letters of Agreement with participating countries. Most countries which signed Resolution S2 are participating in the Programme (Table 1). Individual countries formally join the Programme by signing a Letter of Agreement, specifying the financial contribution to be made and nominating a National Coordinator. Contributions to the trust fund are made on an annual basis and cover the cost of meetings, publications and overall coordination. The financial contributions are based on the UN assessment rating of countries. Letters of Agreement are signed for the current phase which lasts five years. The Programme is overseen by a Steering Committee composed of National Coordinators from all participating countries. As formal representatives of their countries, the National Coordinators act as a link between the coordinating secretariat and national institutions involved in the activities on forest genetic resources. They seek to commit all relevant institutions within their country to carry out the agreed tasks and liaise between them (Fig. 2). The Steering Committee meets every three years to review the progress made, discuss issues relevant to gene conservation in Europe, make recommendations for the future of the Programme including new networks and to approve the budget. The first meeting, attended by representatives of 27 countries was held in November 1995 (in Sopron, Hungary). While the objectives and the overall structure of the Programme were confirmed, the meeting recommended further development of activities on the conservation of forest genetic resources in addition to networking. EUFORGEN thus aims at providing a contribution to various international collaborative initiatives, raising public awareness and facilitating information flow among countries 8 . The species-based approach was considered to best accomplish the overall role. A new network on Social Broadleaves (temperate oak and beech) was initiated. The National Coordinators emphasized the continuing interest of their countries in this type of international collaboration. Providing guidance for the development of national policies and encouraging long-term national strategies and activities on forest genetic resources continue to be the most important impact areas of the Programme. 8 Report of the first Steering Committee meeting. 1996 (see Annex V, List of publications).Steering CommitteeManagement CommitteeQuercus suber NetworkAttended by Na tional Coo rdinators and resou rce persons from three European countries and Canada, the European Forest Genetic Resources Workshop, which was held concurrently with the Steering Committee meeting in 1995, also provided several technical recommendations with regard to the conservation of forest genetic resources in Europe. For example, it was recommended that the a ctivities on g enetic reso urces an d their co nservation be in creasingly in tegrated in to a pplied silviculture an d forest management systems. R ecognizing the b asic link b etween c onservation, tree improvement and managed use of forests, the Workshop also recommended that a balance be sought between in situ conservation and sustainable forest management on the one hand, and management of protected areas on the other, and that conservation and management of genetic resources in s itu an d ex s itu, and tree impr ovement activities be co nsidered c omplementary strategies (IPGRI/FAO 1996) 9 .The EUFORGEN Management Committee composed of two representatives of FAO and two representatives of IPGRI was set up and meets twice a year to provide technical and scientific advice to the secretariat. The coordinating secretariat (EUFORGEN Coordinator and part-time assistant) acts as a facilitator of the activities, ensures the implementation of the Programme in accordance with the mandate given by the Steering Committee, provides logistic support to networks and ensures that the agreed workplans are carried out, reports on the activities, prepares financial reports, maintains contacts with the National Coordinators and assists with the search for donors to support tasks of the workplans.EUFORGEN operates through networks in which forest geneticists and other forestry specialists work together to analyze needs, exchange experiences and develop conservation strategies and methods for selected species (Picea abies, Populus nigra, Quercus suber, Noble Hardwoods and Social Broadleaves). The networks also contribute to the development of conservation strategies for the ecosystems to which these species belong.Two different levels of involvement in the networks are distinguished: attending members, who participate in the meetings and corresponding members, who exchange information but do not attend the meetings. Both attending and corresponding members receive all related information and are expected to facilitate the implementation of tasks given in the workplans. This arrangement contributes towards maintaining network meetings reasonably small and dynamic, and ensures that each country is represented in the networks according to its needs. All network members are nominated by the respective National Coordinator. This structure is flexible and allows for modifications whenever additional networks are established.Network meetings are held at regular intervals (Table 2). They review the progress made, set priorities, establish and update workplans and plan further collaborative activities accordingly. A chairperson is elected within each network. Despite differences between the networks' focus and needs, their members chose a similar approach to solving common tasks. The collaborative activities of the networks typically include regular exchange of information, development of conservation strategies and technical guidelines, common descriptors and databases, identification of common research needs and preparation of joint project proposals, exchange of genetic materials, literature overviews, public awareness activities, etc. Network members, in collaboration with other scientists and forest officers from participating countries, carry out the tasks of agreed workplans with their own resources as inputs in kind to the Programme. Many practical outputs have been produced by the networks to date (Table 3). Members of all the networks exchange information about the status of genetic resources, conservation, breeding and research activities, methods, legislation, constraints, needs and priorities. This is considered very helpful for developing the national strategies. Country reports were presented during the first network meetings and brief updates were then provided and discussed at the subsequent meetings. They are published after the meetings (see Annex V, List of publications). The information obtained on individual species enables to produce overviews and analyses of data and to monitor the progress made. An important role of the networks is also to disseminate information about the use of advanced methods and technologies in genetic conservation.Long-term European gene conservation strategies are developed for the individual species or groups of species. The Noble Hardwoods network identified species which need attention according to the priorities given by all participating countries. The main objective of the strategy for Noble Hardwoods is to create good conditions for future evolution. The steps suggested for better conserving the diversity within entire distribution areas of elms, maples, mountain ash and wild fruit trees include ecogeographic and genetic surveys, preservation and enhancement of variation in small local populations, improvement of methods, creation of a European network of gene conservation stands and regulations on the transfer of reproductive material. When suggesting a network of stands, it is important to take into consideration many factors such as the occurrence of genetic diversity under marginal environmental conditions, representativeness for certain areas and minimum population sizes. According to the strategies, in situ and ex situ conservation measures should be integrated. For example, the conservation approach to rare wild fruit trees requires the establishment of breeding populations as essential part of the strategy.The network emphasizes that existing activities should be better linked to each other and that joint European strategies serve as orientation and support for the implementation of national or regional programmes. The development of these strategies also illustrates the consensus building role of the networks.The need for practical guidelines on the management of gene conservation stands in particular, and on genetically sustainable forestry in general, has been recognized since the establishment of EUFORGEN. A first booklet with technical guidelines was produced by the Norway spruce network 10 , followed by cork oak and Noble Hardwoods networks (in preparation). They aim at providing advice to forest officers and authorities responsible for gene conservation. The guidelines for Norway spruce are divided into chapters on in situ conservation and ex situ conservation in populations, collections and in genebanks. The black poplar network produced a set of guidelines which focus on the management of different types of genetic collections.Data about genetic resources, including gene conservation stands and clone collections, are stored in databases that vary in format, structure and information level. In order to ensure better access to this information, as well as comparability of data, attention has been given to standardization of databases. The first step towards harmonizing data from different countries and on the various species was to develop lists of descriptors. Simple lists of descriptors have been agreed so far by the four networks (Table 3). In addition to the common minimum descriptors (geographic position, responsible institution and ownership, type and function of gene conservation unit, genetic evaluations, etc.) each country or institute registers a number of complementary data for various purposes (e.g. threats, detailed ecological site descriptors).The next step undertaken by networks, where relevant, is to link the existing data in joint databases. A database of black poplar clones available in European countries was established. There are currently more than 2000 entries and the database has been used successfully for the identification of duplications in national collections. It is maintained as an input in kind by a voluntary institute and has been made available on the internet through the coordinating secretariat.Regular meetings of the networks provide an opportunity to plan and develop joint project proposals. Network members often work together with, or as partners involved in different ongoing research projects, discuss the application of results and complement the approach taken. The cork oak network, for example, developed an EU-funded FAIR project for the evaluation of genetic resources in this species. Provenance tests in seven countries have been established within this effort. Close collaboration exists between the black poplar network and another EU/FAIR project on genetic diversity in riparian ecosystem. Members of the Noble Hardwoods network work together with a genetic resources project on elms 11 . A collaborative project on genetic resources of broadleaved species in southeastern Europe was developed with contribution of the Noble Hardwoods and the Social Broadleaves networks. These examples illustrate the role of the EUFORGEN Programme for mobilizing funds for tasks carried out by the networks and for gene conservation activities in general.The conservation and use of locally adapted genetic resources is considered very important for forest tree species in general. The networks have frequently pointed at the risks associated with the transfer of reproductive material with unknown properties or from unknown sources. Nevertheless, small quantities of genetic material have been exchanged among the members of the cork oak and black poplar networks for experimental purposes.Reference clones were exchanged and a core collection of clones established by the black poplar network. The core collection includes representative clones from the entire distribution area 12 . It aims at providing a tool for standardized evaluation of national collections. The collection is propagated and sent to any interested institute on request. The origin and other data for all clones are given according to the common descriptor list developed previously by the network.During the first years of the existence of the Programme, it was realized that the tasks of conservation of genetic resources are insufficiently known and often unclear to the general public. Therefore, the networks devote time to discussing and developing tools for raising public awareness. Besides presentations and publications on this subject by the network members in their countries, joint outputs of the networks, which contribute to the task, are leaflets, slide collections, posters etc. The organization of network meetings itself (see Table 2) is also a contribution to raising awareness in the respective countries. An internet site was launched which describes the objectives of Resolution S2, informs about activities of the EUFORGEN Programme and makes the outputs of the networks available (). The EUFORGEN logo became part of the public awareness role played by the networks (Fig. 3).Overviews of literature with regard to genetic resources of species are a regular task of the networks. They are reviewed during meetings and subsequently completed and published in the reports of network meetings. Particular attention is paid to unknown manuscripts and 'grey literature' with limited diffusion.EUFORGEN collaborates with other regional initiatives and organizations involved in the conservation of genetic resources. In particular IUFRO 13 working groups on research into conservation, genetic resources and breeding provide a basis for complementary activities. The networks have established informal links with the relevant working groups.Exchange of information takes place with the secretariat of the Pan-European Strategy on Biological and Landscape Diversity. EUFORGEN activities as such contribute toward its implementation.The first meetings of the cork oak network were organized jointly with FAO's programme \"Silva Mediterranea\", which also helped to involve Morocco and Tunisia in the network later on. The black poplar network benefited from the meetings and activities of the International Poplar Commission of FAO.These two networks developed their strategies (see above) in collaboration with non-European countries in the distribution area of the species and equally concerned with their genetic conservation and use. Links have been sought between all the networks and adjacent regions, particularly with countries in North Africa, West and Central Asia and North America.Most countries from the European part of the former Soviet Union participate actively in the EUFORGEN networks. Special efforts are being undertaken to assist the newly independent states, through international collaboration, in strengthening their programmes on forest genetic resources in light of the political and economic changes.A works hop was convened in Belar us (in S eptember 1996), to provide an over view o f th e current activities, to reassess needs and priorities, and to emphasize the interest and capacities of these c ountries to be proactive in international c ollaboration. A number of p ossible collaborative projects were proposed and further developed later. They led to the establishment of colla borative m echanisms in C entral Asia and the C aucasus, r egions which are h ome t o genetic resources of importance to many tree species occurring in Europe.One of the key problem areas identified by east and central European countries within the follow-up to Helsinki Resolution H3 ('Forestry cooperation with countries with economies in transition') was forest genetic resources and conservation. The activities described within the framework of EUFORGEN provide an opportunity for links with that Resolution.Since its establishment in 1994 EUFORGEN has become fully operational and has received the practical endorsement of participating countries. A major contribution of this networking Programme towards implementing Resolution S2 is the technical and political impact it has on the development of national programmes and strategies in the long term, fully recognizing that the responsibility for decisions on the management of genetic resources and their financing lies entirely with each country.It is hoped that all signatory countries of Resolution S2 join EUFORGEN in the future. The mode of operation through several species oriented networks reinforces the basic role of individual countries and their national genetic conservation programmes. The participating countries determine priorities for common tasks in the networks according to their needs. The five networks for 'pilot species' have been developed taking into consideration the priorities of countries and the actual possibilities of the Programme. It is often requested that new networks be established or additional species be included under the scope of the existing networks. Any changes regarding the scope of the networks and other important decisions lie with the Steering Committee of National Coordinators as the officially nominated representatives of their countries.The networks bring together partners with different interests and priorities but their outputs provide a stimulus for activities in all participating countries. This requires networks to maintain a flexible organization and that the effectiveness in accomplishing the common tasks is higher than if members had tried to reach them individually. The actual implementation of network tasks relies on the willingness to provide various contributions in kind of individual countries to the networks. In order to increase these contributions, and thus to strengthen their impact on national activities, it is desirable to involve decision makers further. Further attention to the follow-up work by European agencies and organizations would be beneficial. The 'multiplier effect' of network activities for stimulating development of national and various international projects has been shown.EUFORGEN as a specialized programme could provide a linkage and increasingly harmonize efforts related to genetic resources and conservation among the different Ministerial Resolutions. It is essential to avoid any duplication of efforts in this area. The Programme should also continue to act as a contribution towards implementing the Pan-European Strategy on Biological and Landscape Diversity and the Convention on Biological Diversity (COB) in general.Collaboration with other regions outside of Europe is also very important and should further be strengthened, considering the necessity to conserve and sustainably use the genetic diversity of forest tree species in their entire distribution areas.Mediterranean oaks would enable the Social Broadleaves Network to concentrate its efforts on temperate species.Almost all field trials within the provenance experiment have now been planted. Most countries reported severe difficulties with finding suitable, sufficiently homogeneous and available land. It was stressed that experience obtained from establishing the trials must be well documented. It will be essential not only for the further management of these trials but also useful for setting up similar experiments in the future. A handbook will, therefore, be developed for this purpose in the framework of the EU/FAIR project.To complement the approach taken in the handbook, concise Technical Guidelines on the conservation and management of cork oak genetic resources are currently being developed by the Network. These will aim at forest officers and national agencies responsible for genetic resources and will consist of 4 chapters. The first draft will be presented and discussed at the next Network meeting in 1999.Several documents were exchanged among Network members after the meeting, including the assessment of needs and priorities for gene conservation of Mediterranean oaks throughout the region. An updated version of the Bibliography on cork oak genetic resources (first published in 1997) has been uploaded on the Internet.The third Picea abies Network meeting was held in Opocno, Czech Republic, 26-29 April 1998. The participants discussed the progress made in the implementation of national strategies and focused on the role of genetic resources in view of the global changes of the environment and air pollution. It was recognized that each country had a national strategy on Norway spruce genetic resources either in preparation, or already in place. The main purpose was to outline gene conservation as part of the overall national forestry policy. No serious constraints or difficulties in developing the national strategies were reported. It was stated that further exchange of experience and the support from the Network would be needed for their practical implementation.It was noted that gene conservation of Norway spruce in the different regions of Europe has different objectives and subsequently requires different approach and methods. For instance, the main argument for gene conservation in central and eastern Europe is the threat to genetic diversity posed by air pollution. Genetic resources of Norway spruce in areas affected by air pollution were discussed in detail during the meeting. The economic importance of Norway spruce and its wide use in afforestations was mentioned as the main argument for gene conservation in Belgium, Finland, Lithuania, Norway, Sweden and other countries. The main task is to ensure sufficient genetic diversity in the managed Norway spruce stands for their dynamic development.The participants stressed that a common information source/database of Norway spruce genetic resources is essential to monitor the progress made in each country and to provide up-to-date information about the coverage of the genetic variation in the species' distribution area by gene conservation measures. Using the Network's common minimum descriptors, summary information sheets were compiled after the meeting. Links to the national databases will be provided through the Network's Internet home page. The Report of the meeting (including brief progress reports) has been published on the Internet and printed copies are available on request. It was also agreed to regularly update the Technical Guidelines that were produced by the Network in 1997. A list of items to be added or updated was agreed upon.In addition to Norway spruce, it was suggested that Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) serve as a model species with continuous distribution, since the gene conservation measures for both species are often very similar. It was agreed that the scope (and name) of the Network should be changed to Spruce and Pine Network.The Bibliography on genetics, breeding and genetic resources of Norway spruce is currently being prepared in close collaboration with the IUFRO Working Party 2.02.11. As a first step, search runs were conducted in existing literature databases and several files were sent to the contact persons identified previously in each country. The lists of references already available were also established on the Internet in order to facilitate the process of collecting and compiling references by the national contact persons. Format and outputs/file types were specified. It was agreed that files should be sent by each contact person to IPGRI before 1 December 1998. The Bibliography will be published electronically as an on-line searchable database in 1999. It will be accessible from the home pages of both the IUFRO Working Party and the Network.Members of the Noble Hardwoods Network met in Sagadi, Estonia, 13-16 June 1998. Participants reviewed the progress made in their countries since the last meeting (March 1997) and agreed on the further development of a number of practically oriented activities: longterm European gene conservation strategies, technical guidelines, bibliography, documentation of genetic resources and research. Several outputs resulting from these activities are included in the Report of the meeting which has been compiled and will be available in early 1999. The Report of the second Network meeting and a leaflet about their gene conservation in Europe were produced during the year. The need to raise awareness of policy makers, foresters and the general public of the role and potential of the often overlooked species covered by the Network, was re-emphasized.Discussions during the Network meeting focused on the strategies and methodologies for the genetic conservation of the species covered. The strategies, previously developed for maples (Acer), elms (Ulmus), rowan (Sorbus) and the wild fruit trees, are concerned with a number of issues from inventories of occurrence and abundance, genetic variation and variation patterns, breeding and reproductive systems, to regeneration, silviculture and sustainable use of the species. It was confirmed that \"rareness\" of species, a term often associated with Noble Hardwoods, was a relative concept because most, if not all, species become \"rare\" at the extremes of their distribution range.Strategy documents on ash (Fraxinus), chestnut (Castanea) and lime (Tilia), prepared and circulated by Network members to all participants in advance before the meeting, were adopted and will be published in the Report. With regard to chestnut, it was stressed that appropriate institutional and professional links need to be forged between horticulturists and foresters to ensure the mutual support and collaboration of both groups.The core of any conservation strategy for Noble Hardwoods is their silvicultural management and sustainable use, carried out with due attention to genetic principles. An overview paper on this topic was presented. Technical Guidelines, aimed at forest officers responsible for genetic conservation in European countries, will be produced by the Network and their outline was agreed upon during the meeting. The basis for concern related to global climate change must lie in ensuring availability of genetic variation in tree populations which will allow them to adapt to changing environments. A special paper was prepared and discussed at the meeting.The Network also discussed information management on Noble Hardwoods genetic resources in Europe. The common descriptors, previously proposed by the Network, should be kept to the very minimum. If countries wish and are able to record additional variables, this would be an advantage but should not necessarily be coordinated at an international level. While the development of national databases was encouraged, the issue of a common, centralized information system on Noble Hardwoods would need to be further discussed. In the meantime, a link page will be set up on the Network's Internet site, which will include a list of the agreed common descriptors and electronic links to existing national databases as requested by the countries concerned.The Network decided to regularly update the overview of ongoing national and international research projects. The possibilities of securing additional EU funding for some of the Network activities were noted, including shared cost projects (EU Framework Programme V, INCO-Copernicus etc.). The participants also expressed their wish to strengthen the links between EU-funded research projects and scientists in non-EU countries. It was stressed that priority should be given to research on reproductive biology of the Noble Hardwood species, as a basis for the development and implementation of long-term genetic conservation strategies. A meeting to discuss the possible submission of a project proposal was held in Sweden at the end of October.Following the meeting in Sagadi, countries participating in the Network updated and added new information to the table of priorities concerning species considered important for gene conservation. This information, so far contributed to by 27 countries, has been made available on the Internet.The EUFORGEN Populus nigra and Social Broadleaves Networks did not hold a meeting during the period (April to November 1998), but progress in their activities was made through correspondence and exchange of data and information. The Reports of the previous Network meetings were published and distributed to almost 800 addresses in the case of the Report of the fourth Populus nigra Network meeting and 500 in the case of the Report of the first meeting on Social Broadleaves. Network members also represented the Networks at a number of international meetings (Black poplar meeting in Germany in May 1998; IUFRO Division 2 Conference in China in August 1998).The Third Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe was held in Lisbon, 2-4 June 1998. The ministers responsible for forestry adopted two resolutions concerning socioeconomic aspects and the pan-European criteria, indicators and operational level guidelines for sustainable forest management. EUFORGEN reported on the implementation of Strasbourg Resolution S2.The Conference was attended by 37 Signatory States, the European Union, 5 observer countries and a number of international governmental and non-governmental organizations. The General Declaration and two \"Lisbon Resolutions\" adopted by the Conference emphasized the need to strengthen the links between the forestry sector and society, increasing dialogue and mutual understanding, and further enhancing the participation of all relevant stakeholders in the sustainable management of forests.Within Resolution L1, the Signatory States committed themselves, inter alia, to maintaining and developing frameworks conducive to enabling and motivating all forest owners to practice sustainable forest management; to adapt education and training systems for the development of a highly skilled, multidisciplinary workforce; to promote the improvement and application of appropriate safety and health standards and practices, professionalism of forest owners, workers and contractors, and skills certification.The 'Pan-European Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management', previously developed by expert level follow-up meetings to the Second Ministerial Conference, were endorsed in Lisbon (Resolution L2). These represent a basis for the development of national criteria and indicators and for international reporting in six areas: forest resources, health and vitality, productive functions of forests, biological diversity in forest ecosystems, protective functions and other socio-economic functions and conditions. Criteria and indicators will be used as a tool for policy analysis and formulation at the national level. Regular reporting will give the possibility of detecting trends and changes at an early date, thus providing valuable information on future developments in each Signatory State. As part of Resolution L2, 'Operational Level Guidelines for Sustainable Forest Management' were also endorsed, a rather general framework of recommendations for use on a voluntary basis.Several indicators are relevant to forest genetic resources and one of them ('Changes in the proportions of stands managed for the conservation and utilization of forest genetic resources') directly concerns the assessment of gene reserve forests, seed collection stands etc. While it is widely recognized that management of forests should also be genetically sustainable, the genetic criteria and indicators will require further development and concrete application by European countries during the coming years. The main challenge for our Programme within this process is to harmonize efforts related to genetic diversity among the different resolutions and initiatives.An in-depth internally-commissioned external review of IPGRI's activities in Europe was carried out in September 1998. The review panel consisted of Dr Eva Thörn, Director of the Nordic Gene Bank, Sweden; Dr Michel Arbez, Director of Forest Research Station INRA, Bordeaux-Cestas France; and Prof. Ivan Nielsen, Department of Systematic Botany, University of Aarhus, Denmark. The review, conducted every four years, covered IPGRI's work in both forest and crop genetic resources areas, in eastern and western Europe. The work of IPGRI on forest genetic resources in Europe is largely carried out through EUFORGEN. The review provided a critical analysis of the adequacy, quality and effectiveness of activities in addressing overall institutional objectives and strategy; achievements and impact; complementarity and linkages with partners; constraints and priorities for future work. Several National Coordinators were contacted by the review panel members.The review panel developed several recommendations with relevance to EUFORGEN. The main outcomes, applicable to EUFORGEN, are as listed below.• The need for an increased autonomy of the activities carried out within the individual Networks was expressed by the panel. The number of participating countries is high and is expected to increase further, which means an additional workload for the coordination of EUFORGEN.• The review panel recommended that close attention be paid to the need for building strong national programmes in the eastern but also western European countries (mainly by improving public awareness about the importance of creating national programmes). • IPGRI's Regional Office for Europe has a responsibility for mobilizing expertise and funds in Europe for the benefit of other regions. It was recommended that the level of fundraising activities for collaboration with other regions be increased in Europe, and that IPGRI involves National Coordinators in the process.• The self-sustainability of EUFORGEN in terms of its financing from the participating countries is rather unique within IPGRI's system of operations. With a stronger commitment from the countries, increased participation and activities in the Networks, there will be a need for increased funding for plant genetic resources in the region. It was noted that the possibilities for receiving funds from the EU programmes have not yet been fully exhausted. The review panel recommended that IPGRI make further efforts to investigate the potential sources of funding within the EU programmes, in particular INTAS, INCO, PHARE and TACIS.• During the take-off phase of EUFORGEN (1994EUFORGEN ( -1998)), the number of species of concern, as well as the number of participating countries has increased, but the amount of staff time available for the coordination of the Programme has not increased. It will be necessary to stabilize the number of Networks and/or reduce the frequency of meetings, or even leave some Networks after they become sufficiently autonomous, in order to be able to transfer some time to new activities proposed by the participating countries. The review panel suggested not to embark on many new species (Networks), but to pay attention to the issues associated with the continuity of gene reserves and regeneration.• It was recommended that more community ecology expertise be included in the EUFORGEN Networks.• The panel recommended that the proposed training course on forest genetic resources be organized in the near future.• The review panel recommended that contacts with developing countries, especially those of the Central, West Asia and North Africa region be further strengthened, for example by inviting institutions and students to participate in the relevant activities of the European Networks. Collaboration with the countries of this region should be increased for both scientific and development reasons.• EUFORGEN should develop collaboration with institutions working with long-term regional effects of climate change on European forests as well as its consequences for longterm gene conservation. The role of the European Forest Institute (EFI) was emphasized in this regard.• The review panel recommended that particular efforts be made to promote plant genetic resources programmes in the countries of the former Soviet Union and to mobilize funding for these activities.During 1997, IPGRI initiated a three-year project on Broadleaved Forest Genetic Resources in Southeast Europe (Bulgaria, Moldova and Romania). The activities undertaken with financial assistance of Luxembourg include the development of maps of distribution areas, the compilation of databases of seed stands and in situ gene conservation units, as well as the development and application of advanced micropropagation techniques for priority species. Experiments on in vitro rooting of oaks (Quercus spp.) and Sorbus domestica were prepared and conducted jointly by scientists from the Forest Research Institute in Sofia, Bulgaria and the Centre de Recherche Public-Centre Universitaire in Luxembourg. Scientists from Luxembourg and Romania focused on developing techniques for somatic embryogenesis of Quercus robur. The results obtained, to be published in scientific journals, will contribute to making ex situ conservation and use of the genetic resources in the region more effective. An inventory, carried out in three neighbouring southeast European countries during the past year, led to the establishment of comprehensive electronic databases and the construction of maps of distribution areas for Quercus robur, Q. petraea and Fagus sylvatica. Several practical recommendations on the genetic principles of sustainable forest management, partly resulting from this inventory, were provided to the respective state forest services. The second meeting of partners was held at the end of September 1998 in Chisinau, Moldova. They discussed the progress made and agreed on the activities to be carried out during the second year. More attention will be given to studying the adaptation processes of populations. Among other outputs, a monograph on beech (Fagus spp.) genetic resources in the region will be published. A scientific workshop is also planned in Bulgaria in May 2000.A database on in situ forest genetic resources in the Russian Federation has been initiated by the Russian Tree Breeding Centre (CENTRLESSEM) with technical and financial support from IPGRI. Currently, the considerable amount of information resulting from the work of forestry research institutions in identifying valuable in situ forest genetic resources in the Russian Federation is not readily accessible to other scientists and forest officers responsible for gene conservation. This includes, for in situ conservation activities, information on designated gene reserves and gene conservation stands, plus trees, seed stands, valuable provenances, populations, seed orchards, clonal archives etc. The establishment of a computerized database will allow efficient storage, retrieval and dissemination of this information, which will thus be made available to the national and international scientific community. At national level, it will also improve the monitoring of the forest genepool and its appropriate conservation, and will facilitate the use of forest genetic resources. It includes a training component and will result in the establishment of the database structure, purchase of the necessary equipment (computer, software) and starting data entries by the end of 1998.The EUFORGEN Populus nigra Network results from a convergence between the objectives of Resolution 2 and the recommendations of the International Poplar Commission (IPC/FAO). During its 19 th Session in Zaragoza (1992), the IPC recommended to work actively on the genetic conservation of Populus species. In 1993, P. nigra was chosen as a pilot species for one of the EUFORGEN Networks. There were a priori many reasons for creating the P. nigra Network:• Poplar is a highly domesticated forest tree of economic importance all over the world, and poplar breeders, using advanced strategies based on recurrent selection and clonal varieties, are concerned with the long-term preservation of genetic resources • The survey carried out by Resolution 2 confirmed the status of P. nigra as a threatened species mainly due to the alteration of the riparian ecosystem under human activities, and to the interactions between wild and cultivated genepools • P. nigra may also be considered as a model species for biological reasons: dioecy, pioneer behaviour, sexual versus vegetative propagation.The fact that ex situ conservation of P. nigra had already started in many countries with support from poplar breeding programmes facilitated the Network from the outset. Indeed, at least 15 of the 19 countries, which have so far participated in the Network, are represented by research organizations also involved in breeding. Four of them are even specialized \"poplar institutes\".A general framework for the conservation of P. nigra in Europe, based on the very diverse situations and strategies developed at national level, could be established from a synthesis of 17 national reports (Lefèvre et al. 1998). The first priority was to ensure the coordination of ongoing ex situ conservation activities. Agreement among all participating Network members was easily obtained, probably due to their previous involvement in collaborative activities. Guidelines and lists of descriptors were developed; reference material exchanged among Network members and a core collection of clones established. The database of European clone collections was set up which now contains entries from 18 national collections. Available on the Internet and updated regularly, it is a tool of major interest for poplar breeding purposes worldwide. Of course, the exchange of poplar germplasm for breeding already occurred before EUFORGEN, but this database should make it more efficient, by providing up-to-date information on the material available throughout Europe, and allowing to easily detect duplicates among different collections. Recently, even Chinese and North American colleagues contacted Network members, asking for P. nigra pollen for their breeding programmes.The difficulty sometimes lies in achieving the implementation of the agreed tasks, for example, many more accessions could be entered in the database, but compilation and collection of data are time consuming and costly. We have reached a fair level of coordination of ex situ activities over Europe, but a final implementation in all participating countries would require additional financial and technical input.Concerning the in situ strategy, a synthesis of ongoing activities has so far been provided. The identification of P. nigra in the wild was identified as a key concern for conservation activities and a practical leaflet for non-specialists was published (now translated in 8 languages); a list of stand descriptors was also prepared. In comparison with the ex situ activities, in situ conservation has been looked upon from a methodological point of view rather than applied. This is because we generally lack inventories of riparian forests and of P. nigra in particular. Also, the riparian area may have different (specific) ownership patterns and forest services are not the only organizations involved in their management. Finally, the biology of a pioneer species makes it difficult to define concrete operational conservation action, because the management does not only concern the species itself but also, and probably mainly, the whole ecosystem. The dynamics of P. nigra is highly dependent on the water regime, but its conservation is obviously not the first priority in the management of river systems.A joint research proposal came out of the Network discussions and was accepted for funding by the EU in 1997 (EUROPOP: Genetic diversity in river populations of European black poplar for evaluation of biodiversity, conservation strategies, nature development and genetic improvement). This project will provide a standardized evaluation of the genetic diversity within participating countries (both natural populations and ex situ collections).Public awareness was also identified as a key task for the Network, probably because of the particular status of the species: with regard to poplars, the question of clonal forestry, interspecific hybridization, exotic germplasm and ecology of riparian sites is raised. We are convinced that sustainable management of the resource is possible, but it requires people with different interests (wood production, gene conservation, ecology, landscape etc.) to discuss on a reliable scientific basis.This Network should continue its activity on P. nigra, with 2 objectives in the short term:• To ensure the further coordination of ex situ conservation activities at the European level in the long term • To facilitate the in situ conservation activities at the European level.The first objective deals with the conservation of the diversity and its use. This will be useful not only for Europe. The strategy is well defined and its implementation has already begun in most countries. The first point is to complete the European database. In any case, it will be necessary to clarify the responsibilities for the maintenance and updating of this database. Ex situ conservation is \"easy\" with black poplar as it allows for an immediate use of germplasm (in breeding or restoration of riparian sites), but it cannot alone ensure the long-term genetic conservation. Dynamic strategies are needed: in situ or breeding populations.The second objective is increasingly demanded by countries participating in the Network, which have already started in situ conservation or plan to do so. This area is particularly interesting for managers of riparian sites who want to monitor the consequences of their activities. Beyond methodological questions, the Network is also an opportunity to set up an applied in situ programme at the European level: EUFORGEN as such is an important motivation for many countries and, considering the situation of black poplar, motivation is deeply needed to support the existing plans and projects.Concerning ex situ conservation, the Network should focus on the evaluation of genetic diversity and facilitate germplasm exchange when needed, either for poplar breeding or non-commercial plantations. For P. nigra, the diversity has prevailingly been assessed at the individual (clonal) level. This is probably a sound approach since we do not know exactly what is a provenance in this pioneer species (structure of diversity for adaptive traits, small linear \"populations\", decay of riparian sites). As a first step, the EUROPOP project will give an evaluation of the genetic diversity maintained in national clone collections compared with the diversity found in wild populations in Europe, after which decisions will be made about the need for further collecting. In fact, EUROPOP was initiated within the Network and the Network will benefit from its scientific results. The Network and the EUROPOP participants will join in a large panel of experts to define appropriate strategies for in situ conservation and re-introduction. The challenge is then to extend the work carried out also to non-EU member countries participating in the Network. Close links are certainly needed; the Network should help non-EU countries to achieve the evaluation of their collections following common standards. The Network should extend the current European database of passport data to characterization. The inclusion of more material from outside Europe should also be given attention.To develop the in situ strategy, we will first have to identify a network of conservation sites over Europe, and then define management rules within and among the sites. Initially, the Network could at least identify a list of riparian areas considered by each country as essential for the genetic conservation of P. nigra and define their status (ownership, management, protection). A database of in situ conservation units should be organized after joint discussions between EUROPOP and the Network. Some of the Network countries have a long-term breeding strategy for poplars, which includes breeding population. This can be considered as a dynamic approach to conservation, and a certain level of coordination among European breeding programmes might be useful. Concerning the selection of Euramerican hybrid clones (P. deltoides × P. nigra), the Network should actively promote the diversification of the genetic base used in the different poplar breeding institutes.Finally, an evaluation of the costs of ex situ, in situ and breeding populations would be of great interest for the submission of research or applied conservation projects.The Network is involved in the coordination of practical conservation activities but scientific discussions are also needed. One task for the Network is to submit joint project proposals, and therefore scientific discussions are needed prior to submission. Moreover, when a research project is accepted, a close link should be maintained with the Network, as is the case with EUROPOP, in order to enlarge the audience for both groups and exchange more ideas effectively in both directions. The Network will also benefit from the outcomes of the research projects.During its fourth meeting (October 1997), the P. nigra Network decided to extend its scope to P. alba. This matter will be further discussed during the next meeting. Not all countries are interested in this species and, initially, the activities will be limited to the application of the ex situ guidelines also for this white poplar. In the future, we can imagine two directions for the further extension of the Network: the first based on taxonomy (Salicaceae), the second based on ecology (riparian forest ecosystem).The Network participants now represent a good coverage of the species distribution range. A closer involvement of Mediterranean countries, including North Africa, would be of great interest not only to the P. nigra Network, but probably also to other Networks.Two meetings of the Network were satellite to IPC Sessions (Izmit 1994 andSarvar 1996); one followed the final meeting of an EU/FAIR project on poplars (Casale Monferrato 1995). This was a way to broaden the scientific scope of the meeting but, in fact, some countries still have difficulty in joining extra meetings. A joint meeting with the EUROPOP project is planned in 2000.Internet is of great interest for most members and for the dissemination of results worldwide and much has already been done by the Network in that direction. This effort should continue (a more exhaustive database of Network participants, links with homepages of connected research projects etc.), bearing in mind that some partners still need other (non-Internet) access to this information. Concerning a forum of discussion, care should be taken not to overlap with other existing groups (Forestgen, Dendrome…).Links with the other EUFORGEN Networks, but also networks dealing with wild relatives of cultivated crops, would be useful to enrich the discussion.Scientific exchange among EUFORGEN Networks should be developed. Obviously, a joint meeting of Chairs and Vice-Chairs would be easy to organize, but a joint conference of a wider range of Network members could also offer a good opportunity to exchange new ideas, and particularly among people who are not all used to collaborating in the frame of EU research projects. Most of the Network members are poplar breeders and geneticists. The ecology and landscape management perspectives could be better represented. We should be able to invite these specialists to our meetings and facilitate a continued Network discussion.The Strasbourg Resolution S2 Follow-up Committee became interested in Noble Hardwoods partly owing to the reduction in the distribution area of these species due to silvicultural activities, mainly in central European countries. In contrast to the two first selected species, Norway spruce and cork oak, most of the species in our Network are characterized by scattered distribution patterns and some of them are rare.At the first Network meeting (March 1996) a clear objective of the Network was stated: \"Identification of minimum gene conservation activities in the long term from a European perspective\". Tasks were given to different Network members and focused on developing strategies for the different Noble Hardwoods species and genera. These tasks will hopefully be completed in 1999. Many Network members have contributed in an excellent way to this work. A special paper on management of genetic resource populations was developed. A general presentation on evolutionary genetics as a basis for sound gene conservation was prepared, as well as on sampling in the absence of genetic knowledge. Another presentation dealt with consequences of global warming for the species.A concise leaflet aimed at raising public awareness of the need for genetic conservation was published. A database of \"grey\" literature has been developed, as well as minimum standard descriptors for genetic resource populations.Classification of different developmental stages during bud burst and in-wintering has been documented. An EUfunded applied project on genetic resources of elm species has been actively working together with the Network.When the publication of technical guidelines for the conservation of the mandate species is ready, our main task will have been accomplished. Once this has been reached, it is important to follow-up the applied gene conservation activities in individual countries. Moreover, an effective gene conservation must rely on genetic knowledge, which is largely missing for most of the Noble Hardwoods. The Network could serve as a platform for the development of coordinated research. Initiatives in this direction have been taken on several occasions. The latest is to develop a joint proposal on mating patterns in some of our mandate species.As regards the balance between theoretical and applied problems, it should be noted that a sound application must be based on solid evolutionary genetic knowledge and not emotionally motivated. Even if our task is purely applied, it must be based on scientific knowledge. Therefore, it is important that both the scientific and applied sides cooperate within the Network. In this regard, I see the technical guidelines as the primary task of the Network. Besides, it is important that the Network members communicate in their countries with the authorities in charge of applied genetic conservation.A table listing all species and the priorities assigned to them by individual countries was compiled. This was necessary in order to identify common priorities. Similarly, after the extension of the Quercus suber Network to other Mediterranean oaks, that Network has encountered problems common to those of our own Network.With regard to the mode of operation, the meetings have been very constructive and most Network members delivered their reports on time. Meeting once a year might be regarded as a slow process and once every 6 months would certainly speed up the work. On the other hand, most of the Network members have many other duties, so once a year might be close to what is attainable. In my opinion the EUFORGEN Coordinating Secretariat has kept us very well informed about what is going on in the other Networks.Links with other Networks I do not see the need for every forest tree species that is growing in Europe to be considered. The principles for genetic conservation of Norway spruce are certainly valid for Scots pine as well. Perhaps more general issues such as the consequences of global warming for genetic conservation of tree species, the role of tree breeding in gene conservation and a thorough scrutiny of urgent research needs might be more relevant than species oriented work. Similarly, the role of forest tree gene conservation for the non-forest tree species dwelling in our ecosystems and dependent on our forest trees for their existence is important for EUFORGEN to address. Traditionally, these species were treated by ecologists with limited or no connection to forestry.Tree breeders are poorly represented in the Network. Perhaps contacts with breeders would be more useful than meetings between Chairs and Vice Chairs of the Network.When discussing the species to be taken as pilot cases for gene conservation networks in Europe, it was agreed that attention should not only be paid to rare and endangered trees. Widely distributed and commercially important species are, in fact, more significant from the viewpoint of genetic conservation in forest ecosystems, as well as tree breeding.Pollution has caused considerable damage to Norway spruce forests in several countries. Extensive seed transfers also changed the natural structure of populations. On the other hand, simple and inexpensive in situ methods can be used in most cases for effective gene conservation.Publication of the Technical Guidelines is perhaps the most concrete and useful accomplishment. Many countries have their own gene reserves, including nature protected areas, clonal banks or special gene conservation stands. The \"handbook\" will hopefully help national authorities to evaluate the gene reserves and offer practical advice to the forest officers responsible for their management. A common database of gene conservation units and a bibliography on Norway spruce genetics, breeding and genetic resources are underway.Due to various reasons, progress on conservation of forest genetic resources is not as rapid as we would like. Forest genetics and tree breeding are under heavy pressure in many countries. Without the active efforts of those concerned (forest geneticists), often shortsighted commercial policies may lead to genetic erosion. Commitment at a political level, actively supported by international collaboration, is necessary. In this regard, a time span of 10 years might be beneficial for EUFORGEN. If European countries can set a good example, hopefully other countries will accept gene conservation as a part of their national forestry policy. For the future I see the continuity and regeneration of various gene reserves as the crucial issue of genetic conservation. Most countries have their conservation populations, but perhaps no definite plans on how to regenerate them. A national plan on forest genetic resources and the commitment of the respective authority in collaboration with all key players would be the means to achieve them. Some members would like to see a theoretical, purely scientific agenda during Network meetings. However, there are many other, more appropriate fora, such as IUFRO meetings, for scientific discussions. We have been supportive of the idea to occasionally invite a speaker presenting results of new and significant research. It should not be acceptable to say that practical operations can only be started after we have a complete genetic map and/or knowledge of the population structure at our disposal. There is wide support among colleagues for the fact that we must undertake actions with limited genetic knowledge.The original EUFORGEN Picea abies Network aimed to provide a \"pilot case\" for other conifer species with similar characteristics. To my mind, all such species with current, or at least potential value ought to be gradually included. There is a lot of work to be done. As agreed during the third Picea abies Network meeting (April 1998), we suggest broadening the scope to include other spruce and pine species. The Network will first accomplish the tasks it has started on Norway spruce.The number of countries participating in EUFORGEN has increased rapidly, and there is a particular interest if more species are included in a Network. This means that the active participation of all the Network members in meetings becomes difficult and the discussion tends to spread over miscellaneous issues. On the other hand, it is essential for each country to be present and to have an opportunity to contribute to the discussion. A possible solution would be to subdivide the Network into small groups (during meetings), with one or more participants who could then summarize the outcomes of the group discussions in the plenary sessions. Such smaller groups would be more efficient, but it would be difficult to select countries or people. This is also to some extent a political issue and we must not discriminate.It may be a little disappointing that the activity of Network members decreases between meetings. Colleagues are quite active and critical in the meetings, but then deadlines for a number of agreed tasks are not maintained. The tasks given are usually not very time demanding, e.g. when updating the guidelines.The distribution of information and encouraging a more active participation of the Network members is a challenge. There is a general consensus that the receipt of various kinds of advertisements, information leaflets, electronic messages etc. is time demanding and even counter-productive. We cannot compete with commercial firms in quantity and, therefore, high quality and well focused information effectively distributed to the persons involved or concerned is necessary. Internet is very useful, but we must not build too much on it. Not all members have access and the updating of homepages seems to be neglected by many organizations.Links and cooperation among Networks are necessary. There are currently links through (a very few) persons who belong to more than one Network. General and/or scientific issues could be dealt with in joint meetings or workshops; these are usually not specifically related to only one species or a group of species. Furthermore, efforts to appeal to the decision makers would be more effective coming from EUFORGEN as a whole rather than through individual Networks.Cork oak is an important Mediterranean species with natural distribution range confined to the western part of the Mediterranean basin: Algeria, France, Italy, Morocco, Portugal, Spain and Tunisia.Thanks to the joint efforts by various countries, FAO, IPGRI/EUFORGEN and EU financed projects, concerted activities on the management, genetic research and conservation of genetic resources in cork oak have been developed during the past few years. Several relevant initiatives should be mentioned:• Séminaire méditerranéen sur la régénération des forêts de chêne liège dans les pays méditérranéens -held in Tunisia, in 1996 • G.R.A.M. -Groupe de Recherches Agronomiques Méditérranéennes/Ressources Génétiques Forestières -a French initiative for the enhancement of the scientific cooperation among Mediterranean countries. GRAM meetings provide opportunities for contacts, discussion and further cooperation • Séminaire sur l'Amélioration, la Conservation et l'Utilisation des Ressources Génétiques Forestières Marocaines -held in Morocco, in 1997.The following Quercus suber Network meetings were held so far: 1. December 1994, Rome, Italy. The cork oak focal point of the S2 Follow-up Committee organized the first meeting on this species in Lisbon, in July 1993. The meeting discussed issues related to gene conservation of cork oak in Europe and produced a document \"Recommendations of the scientific advisory group for the conservation of the genetic resources of Quercus suber\".Through the EUFORGEN Network, with the overall support of FAO Forestry Department, collaborative project proposals for the conservation of genetic resources of cork oak were jointly prepared and submitted for funding to the grant programmes of the European Union. A concerted action and a research proposal guided by the need of deeper genetic knowledge for sustained conservation of genetic resources of cork oak were submitted. The proposal for a concerted action was adopted for funding (FAIR 1 CT 95 0202).The implementation of the concerted action and the collaborative tasks of the EUFORGEN Network, supported by the links with FAO, provided an excellent basis for work in synergy among all participating countries.These include France, Italy, Portugal (coordinator) and Spain, as well as experts from Germany and Sweden. Three North African cork oak countries (Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia) also joined the project with complementary support from the European Union.Following recommendations by the National Coordinators, a fifth Network was created in EUFORGEN concerning Social Broadleaves. For the time being the Network addresses Quercus petraea, Quercus robur, Fagus sylvatica and Fagus orientalis. Other species may be added in the future.The first meeting of the Social Broadleaves Network was held in Bordeaux, 23-25 October 1997. Participants were representing 23 countries at the first meeting. The meeting permitted to draw a general picture of the status of genetic resources available in Europe on oak and beech and to construct a joint workplan.During the first meeting in Bordeaux, common needs and objectives were identified and tasks were discussed that should be addressed in the next future. Common needs concern particularly:• To improve information flow among countries • To harmonize research priorities and disseminate available research results• To address legislation-related issues • To develop joint, long-term, practically-oriented strategies and standardize or develop methodologies • To raise awareness of decision-makers, the general public and forest owners about the necessity of conserving genetic resources of Social Broadleaves.The participants developed a common workplan with shared responsibilities, which aims at strengthening collaboration among European countries by providing practical outputs such as technical guidelines for the sampling, design and management of gene conservation units, databases, information resources and public awareness tools.During the first meeting, the development of gene conservation strategies was identified as a fundamental task of the Network. As a first step, the current state of the art in the different countries has been assessed. Information about methodologies currently used for in situ and ex situ conservation in European countries will be gathered through a questionnaire. This basic information will lead to preparing a background document to be presented at the next Network meeting. The response to the questionnaire will help to identify topics where additional research is needed (e.g. spatial and genetic structure of diversity in gene conservation units, influence of silvicultural practices). The ultimate objective of the activity is to provide technical recommendations (guidelines) for the sampling, design and management of gene conservation units in beech and oak. It is expected that the research needs identified will be a basis for collaborative research projects to be submitted to different agencies. Strong interface and interaction between the Network and EU supported research projects will be tied, in order to promote dissemination of scientific results useful for promoting and implementing conservation strategies.Information flow among countries on the genetic resources available throughout Europe, their evaluation in provenance tests and in genetic diversity surveys, will be improved by completing current databases.The Network agreed that the species covered by the activities should be Quercus petraea, Quercus robur, Fagus sylvatica and Fagus orientalis. However, concerns were raised about introducing other species (Q. pubescens, Q. pyrenaica, Q. cerris…). Future inclusion of the new species should be considered according to the needs expressed by the different countries.Most west and east European countries participate in the Networks. However, some important geographic areas, where refugial zones have been described are missing: several countries from the Balkan Peninsula, and from the Caucasus.Meetings every 18 to 24 months have been planned. The next meeting will take place in June 1999 in Birmensdorf (Switzerland). This meeting is planned as a joint meeting with the EU supported FAIR project entitled \"Synthetic maps of gene diversity and provenance performance for utilization and conservation of oak genetic resources in Europe\". The creation of an Internet Web site may be considered as an effective tool for exchanging information among participants.In the long run links with the Quercus suber Network may be mutually beneficial, especially with regard to gene conservation of those south European oak species which can hybridize with temperate oaks. Generic meetings between the two Networks that include oaks may be beneficial for discussing common topics as practical conservation strategies. At one point, the need of a general technical meeting across all Networks may appear in order to share different opinions on conservation strategies, and to discuss common technical concerns related to the management of gene conservation units.Annex IV. European Forest Genetic Resources Programme (EUFORGEN) -Proposal for a Phase II 15 (1 January 2000 -31 December 2004)The signatory states of Resolution S2 and participating international institutions at the First Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe (Strasbourg, 1990) committed themselves to implement in their own countries, using whatever methods seem most appropriate, a policy for the conservation of forest genetic resources. Resolution S2 called for the development of an instrument for cooperation on conservation of genetic diversity of European forests:\"To facilitate and extend the efforts undertaken at national and international levels, a functional but voluntary instrument of international cooperation should be found without delay from among the existing relevant organizations to promote and coordinate:1. in situ and ex situ methods to conserve the genetic diversity of European forests; 2. exchanges of reproductive materials; 3. the monitoring of progress in these fields.\"The European Forest Genetic Resources Programme (EUFORGEN) was established in October 1994 as the implementation mechanism of Resolution S2 (Table 1). The overall goal of EUFORGEN is to ensure the effective conservation and the sustainable use of forest genetic resources in Europe. (Second Ministerial Conference in Helsinki, 1993 andThird Ministerial Conference in Lisbon, 1998).As a coordinated European effort, EUFORGEN promotes the establishment and implementation of national programmes on forest genetic resources and facilitates the development of common minimum standards and determination of mechanisms for priority setting.EUFORGEN is financed by its participating countries and is coordinated by the International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI) in collaboration with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO). The Programme is overseen by a Steering Committee of National Coordinators nominated by the participating countries.EUFORGEN operates through a small number of Networks focused on species or groups of species; presently five Networks are operational. Network members from participating countries carry out agreed activities using their own resources, as inputs in kind to the Programme.It was originally agreed that EUFORGEN be established for an initial phase of five years (October 1994 to October 1999).The first Steering Committee meeting, held in Sopron, Hungary, 19-20 November 1995, endorsed the mode of operation for EUFORGEN. The second Steering Committee meeting, in Vienna, Austria, 26-29 November 1998, reviewed the progress made and recommended that a second Phase of five years be launched starting from 1 January 2000.In this second Phase, EUFORGEN should be further developed in support of meeting the objectives outlined in Resolution S2. It was agreed that the main level for implementing the overall objectives remained the species oriented Networks.The EUFORGEN Programme operates as a multilateral trust fund. Individual countries formally join EUFORGEN by signing a Letter of Agreement with IPGRI, in which the financial contribution to be made to the Programme is specified.The Agreement will be deemed invalid if the country does not meet its financial obligations for two years.When joining EUFORGEN, each country is requested to nominate a National Coordinator as the official contact person between the Secretariat and the participating country for all matters relating to the Programme. A Steering Committee composed of the National Coordinators of all participating countries has the overall responsibility for the Programme and meets twice during a Phase to:• review the progress made, discuss and decide upon further activities • set priorities • review the audited financial reports prepared by the Secretariat • approve the budget of the Programme • make recommendations and decisions regarding the future activities • review the concurrence of Network activities with the objectives of EUFORGEN • discuss issues relevant to the conservation of forest genetic resources in Europe.If there is a strong need to convene in a time period shorter than three years, an additional ad hoc Steering Committee meeting will be organized.Decisions at Steering Committee meetings are usually taken by consensus. If necessary in certain cases, the procedure of voting by Steering Committee members will be followed.The role of the National Coordinators is to:• participate in the Steering Committee meetings • ensure that necessary resources are chanelled to the Programme • liaise between the Secretariat and the sponsoring ministry(ies) • liaise between the Secretariat and the national institutions involved in the EUFORGEN activities • nominate attending and corresponding members to the Networks and maintain regular contacts with them • assist national institutes in carrying out the activities of the Programme.EUFORGEN operates through Networks in which forest geneticists and other forestry specialists work together to analyze needs, exchange experiences and develop conservation objectives and methods for selected species. The Networks also contribute to the development of conservation strategies for the ecosystems to which these species belong. Network members and other scientists and forest managers from participating countries carry out agreed workplans with their own resources as inputs in kind to the Programme.Five Networks are operational:• Conifers (started as Picea abies Network)• Mediterranean oaks (started as Quercus suber Network)• Populus nigra (and P. alba)The concurrence of Network activities with the objectives of EUFORGEN is reviewed by the Steering Committee.Two different levels of involvement of countries in the Networks are distinguished: attending members, whose participation in the Network meetings is financed by the Programme and corresponding members who provide and receive information to the Network but do not attend its meetings. Both attending and corresponding members of a Network receive the meeting's report and are expected to facilitate the implementation of workplans given therein. Attending and corresponding members are listed and their contributions published in the reports. This structure contributes towards maintaining Network meetings reasonably small and therefore dynamic and ensures that each country has its (attending or corresponding) representative for each species or group of species.Attending and corresponding members are nominated by the National Coordinators. The Network members should be identified according to the concerns and interests of individual countries and from those institutions which are recognized as playing (or prepared to play) a major role with regard to the species concerned. It is understood that this structure is flexible. The Networks meet (attending members) and exchange information (attending and corresponding members) at regular intervals in order to:• set priorities within the Network • plan collaborative activities such as inventories of the situtation regarding the genetic resources of the species concerned, long-term conservation strategies and technical guidelines, European databases and lists of descriptors • establish and implement workplans • identify common research needs • prepare joint project proposals • agree on the sharing of responsibilities for individual tasks • contribute to raising public awareness • monitor progress made. ","tokenCount":"44247"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/2134088055.json b/data/part_2/2134088055.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..551f3a7ee37c75886511dd958032c784cbd97785 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/2134088055.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"35e5d7330b9adcf7d8c705416f857021","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/6bd1e4cd-c2f8-4f52-a5ab-474c8f37fb47/retrieve","id":"29045946"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"8c7e0af1-eb10-41a4-985f-216bd9419c36","pagecount":"12","content":"• Definición: \"capacidad de competir\"• Ventaja competitiva: poder ofrecer las cuatro 'Ces': • Alcanzar una orientación al mercado.• Que esté organizado.• Establecer sistemas de producción sostenibles.• Definición: \"La producción de bienes y servicios cuidadosamente investigados y diseñados para atraer a los clientes en el mercado\" (Kovacek).• Se produce lo que se puede vender y no viceversa.• Consta de tres componentes: orientación al cliente, orientación a la competencia, y coordinación interfuncional (Narver).Se promocionan los productos • Que el PPR pertenezca a una organización con sentido empresarial, para así:• Mejorar poder de negociación.• Organizar uniones de compra y de venta.• Responder a demandas de cantidad y continuidad.• Tener acceso a servicios de apoyo.• Que la organización obtenga o tenga acceso a información de mercados.• Que la organización identifique ventajas competitivas. ","tokenCount":"128"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/2137228998.json b/data/part_2/2137228998.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c3c01f92b7d90da15df2a6e2feb82f32522aad44 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/2137228998.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"434480b1def2a600b4afe382b27264f8","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/bd0d623a-07ce-4dec-927e-5ffe109d74f2/retrieve","id":"-425771170"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"1a0a04df-08ef-4c2f-92e0-2f397e6895eb","pagecount":"9","content":"Wheat is a commodity of great social and economic importance, equal to rice as a global food security crop. The proposal for CRP 3.1, WHEAT, argues convincingly for a collaborative international research effort to achieve sustainable wheat production systems and improve access to and affordability of wheat as a major food for poor consumers while reversing environmental degradation. To this end, the proposal brings together CIMMYT and ICARDA with other major players in a comprehensive global research program. The track record of these partners is impressive. The proposed program, however, takes on too large an agenda without sufficient supporting analysis of constraints and opportunities for wheat research. It does not sufficiently prioritize activities in order to focus on areas where plausibility of impact is greatest.Defining the case for CGIAR research on wheat is more nuanced than for maize and rice because wheat is produced largely in middle income countries. Furthermore, it is a highly tradable commodity and therefore production increases do not necessarily result in lower consumer prices in the country where it is produced. These issues should be explicitly recognised and a reasonable framework developed to identify research issues and geographic regions that deserve focus of CGIAR wheat research. Regarding the expected negative effects of climate change, there are likely options such as adaptive agronomic management, crop substitution, consumption substitution and wheat imports not considered in the proposal and which would mitigate at least partially the effects of climate change.The steady decrease in rate of gain in wheat yields, and the fact that on a global level the rate of gain is now less than required to meet projected wheat demand, is given as a major justification for this CRP. Although in some major wheat producing countries wheat yields have plateaued or have stalled significantly, the underpinning causes of these yield trends are not considered. The ISPC believes the causes need to be understood, or hypotheses put forward to explain them, to help guide research prioritization on the productivity enhancement components of this CRP.The CRP consists of 10 Strategic Initiatives (SIs), which are generally appropriate and well articulated. The SI outputs are aligned with the System Level Outcomes of the CGIAR Strategic Results Framework (SRF). While impact targets are provided for all SIs there are no analytical justifications or assumptions for these quantitative targets. Lack of explanation about how these targets were derived reduces their credibility. Further, program-level integration, development and delivery strategies are lacking, and the management framework does not appear strong enough for integration of component elements within and across SIs for enhancing program-level outcomes. For example, the lead Center, CIMMYT, has notable dominance in program management. The Management Committee is the CRP executive and below that there is little leadership. It is not clear that this management arrangement can support program-level synergy and cohesion through integration of program components. With CIMMYT and ICARDA having responsibilities for their current regions there is risk that the new program will not bring the needed integration to the two Centers' programs. Likewise, the CRP lacks a strong mechanism for independent oversight and evaluation.CRP 3.1 -WHEAThas a clear vision of the challenges ahead to ensure: (1) increasing wheat demand is met and food is affordable for poor consumers, (2) wheat-based farming systems are more sustainable and resilient, (3) increased wheat production in developing countries is achieved mainly through higher yields, thus lessening pressure on area expansion (4) poverty and malnutrition are reduced, (5) disadvantaged farmers and countries gain better access to cutting-edge proprietary technologies, and ( 6) a new generation of scientists and other professionals guide national agricultural research across the developing world.A central argument put forward by the proponents is that wheat is extremely important in the developing world as a food security crop but its production is threatened by climate change, a host of disease and pest problems, and a steady decrease in rate of yield gain. A global initiative is offered to address these wheat production and productivity challenges building on the past successes of CIMMYT and ICARDA and their partners. While the case is strong for such a program, prioritization of the proposed research agenda is weak. In particular, the proposal has not sufficiently considered the context of the current global wheat research portfolio, recent advances in science and how they affect the prioritization within WHEAT and feasibility of success.Several key issues that underpin justification for CRP WHEAT are not adequately explored. Wheat is produced in middle-income countries, many of which have substantial research capacities. It is also a largely tradable commodity, which means that productivity increases do not necessarily result in lower grain prices for poor consumers in the country that produces it (India being a possible exception).The effects of climate change on wheat yields are estimated to be astonishingly large, but they are likely overestimated because farmers' adaptation was not considered in the cited studies. It would seem that the degree to which the negative impact of climate change can be mitigated by adaptive management is an important researchable issue, especially for South Asia where wheat is grown in multiple cropping systems like the rice-wheat rotation. In the absence of such an analysis, the CRP focuses research efforts on genetic solutions to climate change with little effort on potential for adaptive management. Likewise, in the face of negative climate impacts both producers and consumers may seek alternatives to wheat, and wheat demand could be met by imports. CRP3.1 has a comparative advantage to improve the understanding of likely climate change impacts on global wheat production, the associated impact on food security, nutrition, and poverty alleviation, and using this knowledge to help catalyse global wheat research to mitigate negative impacts. Such work would contribute to research in CRP7 and must be coordinated with it. Until this research is further along, investment in genetic solutions to climate change are premature unless they can be justified as a priority to address major constraints to wheat production and resilience of current wheat systems.Decreasing yield gains are a major justification for CRP3.1 and it is proposed that underinvestment in wheat research is a cause of the trend. The situation is actually worse than this because in a number of major wheat-producing countries and regions (e.g. India and Mexico) yields have plateaued or have stalled abruptly. Lack of understanding the underpinning causes of these trends greatly reduces capacity for good research prioritization on productivity enhancement components within WHEATboth in terms of research on genetics and NRM.There are ten Strategic Initiatives (SI) linked to impact targets that address the SRF's SLOs, particularly on food security. The complement of SIs is generally appropriate, but the SIs are of variable strength and not sufficiently integrated (as discussed below). Furthermore, the SIs are comprehensive rather than strategic, and the strategic coherence at the program level is missing.The revised proposal needs to elaborate on justification for addressing the CGIAR SLOs through research on wheat productivity and wheat systems. Arguments about why wheat research is important for the CGIAR's mission should focus on the comparative advantage and value added of this program in the context of some strong national programs in both the North and the South. The proposal should present realistic propositions regarding probabilities of success for the different research components, and set clear priorities among the totality of alternative interventions. While the geographic priority on South Asia is appropriate, the emphasis on consumption and trade should be stronger. Following such a long history of wheat research, much more quantitative information should be available for prioritization, for instance among crop diseases.The proposal emphasises delivery and impact pathways, and each SI has detailed estimates of expected impact. The plausibility of impact is not well addressed. There are variable levels of uncertainties related to SI success, which have not been elaborated. Some SIs depend on success of other SIs, and there are complex issues conditioning CRP outcomes and impacts that have not been well considered. Thus, the proposal does not provide a strategy to compile the SI component outputs into more aggregated program deliverables consistent with the CGIAR System-Level Objectives (SLOs). Development and delivery plans and associated schedules are not described, and they are complex, particularly for integrated management systems that target resource-limited farmers.The proposal lacks a framework for prioritizing wheat research according to likelihood of success and potential impact and outcomes. Research targets are generally too vague, timeframes are unclear and productivity is used as a metric without clear definition of the productivity benchmark or units. For example, in SI2 the targets relate to total farm productivity, which is undefined and there is no timeframe. The quantitative impact estimates given for the SIs (Table 3) are not explained and methods or source of these estimates are lacking, which reduces their credibility. More clarity is required regarding estimation on productivity increase, number of farmers affected etc. and how sensitive the estimates are to underpinning assumptions.Gender is systematically included for each SI and there is an appropriate emphasis in -understanding livelihood strategies, the resource constraints encountered by women and men, and the roles of women and men in wheat (seed) production‖. For example, consideration of women's role in SI8 is appropriate. However, further development of gender research would be worthwhile to focus on alleviating constraints faced by women and for improving the well-being of women in wheat farming systems. For instance, what are the gender issues associated with feasibility and adoption of CA practices?The impact assessment plan to benchmark and establish baselines for performance metrics in targeted regions is commendable. This will be a major task. In the case of benchmarking current use of wheat germplasm, for instance, there is little available data on varietal releases and adoption in most countries. While impact pathways for crop genetic improvement are quite clear, there is no discussion of the more complex impact pathways for systems-level and NRM research. The CRP will be challenged to identify relevant benchmarks for metrics and benchmarking for systems-level performance and NRM impact. Are there lessons learned from CIMMYT's efforts on CA over the past 15 years? The proposal lists key performance indicators (KPI) for each SI that are not always consistent with the aims of the SI (in SI3, for example, the KPIs focus on N/fertilizer use efficiency but the aim is increased yield through better nutrient and water management). Furthermore purely quantitative publication targets without quality considerations present an incomplete performance metric. While a generic list of performance indicators is also provided (Table 6), these are very -activity oriented‖ and rather than focused on metrics associated with greatest potential for impact. Greater effort should be given to identify more appropriate metrics that capture quality, relevance, and potential for impact and outcomes.The WHEAT proposal would benefit from more detail about the science behind the SIs. What are the current knowledge frontiers and where new research initiatives can make a difference? What differentiates this CRP from previous research or research done elsewhere? In many cases researchable issues are presented as lists with little or no background justification, and there are few hypotheses, for instance regarding the underpinnings of yield trends (as discussed above). SI1 on social science and targeting provides -the social science context‖ for the CRP. Part of the research on wheat markets (price stabilization, reserves, trade, etc), input markets, and risk management seems outside the capability of the proponents, and already a major focus of CRP 2 on policies. SI1 should be refocused on things that CIMMYT and ICARDA do well, and better integrating these activities the other SIs of this CRP. Important issues include institutional and policy constraints in the target regions and clarifying the role of policy/institutional interventions vs. technological ones. Strong partnerships will be needed with CRP 2 on policies and with CRP 7 on climate change issues.Combining SI2 and SI3 seems justified because management of tillage, water and nitrogen are interlinked and there can be significant trade-offs among management options. In addition, both SI2 and SI3 require crop and ecosystem modelling to strengthen the potential to generate IPGs and for extrapolation of site-specific results to wider inference domains. Justification for SI2 is challenged by the highly site-specific nature of research on conservation agriculture (CA), and it is unclear what is new. Although limitations on adoption of -CA packages‖ are recognised, why not shift from the -technology package approach‖ to researching and testing the principles that affect soil erosion, and labour and fuel demands? The plan to test large numbers of genotypes with conservation management practices would benefit from an organizing hypothesis to help guide measurements that deepen understanding of G x M x E interactions. Likewise, the impact of weeds seems to be underplayed given their importance in general and as a serious obstacle to adoption of CA systems in particular. For crop rotations, a broader range of break crops might be considered, in addition to legumes, and the limitations of crop simulations models to capture tillage, residue and rotation effects should be recognised.There is little theoretical or actual evidence to suggest promise for success in genetic improvement of N use efficiency. This component of SI3 should be dropped unless stronger scientific justification can be made. N efficiency is improved indirectly, but significantly, through genetic improvement for yielding ability and higher harvest index associated with it. Efforts on innovative crop and soil management that improves congruence between N supply and demand would appear to be a better bet, and WHEAT could collaborate with GRiSP on this research. The -more crop per drop‖ slogan is narrow and overlooks the importance of improved water capture. The impact of water and N management options are interactive with CA practices and are generally confounded by other environmental higher order interactions. Trade-offs must be considered to quantify the potential for greater production and profit. Much of the water related research seems better done in CRP5, particularly considering complex policy and institutional issues of water. Scientific justification for research on mycorrhizae and root exudates is weak; ambiguous results from a large body of research suggest unlikely progress. SI4 is a key initiative for the entire program as it assembles new genetic materials and outputs derived from SIs 5, 6 and 7. SI4 is an area where the research partners have a strong track record and a worldwide network exists for developing, testing and distributing wheat germplasm. Investigating the underpinning causes of declining trends of wheat yield growth rates and yield plateaus need to be included for prioritizing research on productivity enhancement. The proposed research needs better strategic focus. For instance, there is still considerable emphasis on breeding to deliver finished products to NARS and a proposal to develop hybrids (SI7) without elaboration of how the CGIAR's comparative advantage has changed, given past failures with hybrid wheat. Because this varies depending on individual NARS capacity, more detail about country-level focus should be given. SI5 on wheat diseases is critical to world food security. In SI5 work needs be prioritized according to the prevalence and severity of various wheat diseases and insect pests, which differ in importance by orders of magnitude. Table 5.1 can be built on for this prioritization. The importance of maintenance breeding should be emphasised as that has major consequences for sustaining wheat yield increases. For trait enhancement, transgenic options should be considered in light of their potential and the recent progress with transformation of monocotyledenous crops. SI6 presentation is vague regarding its strategic approach, researchable issues, quality of science, and pathways to delivery and potential impact. -Adaptation to warmer temperatures‖ is a meaningless target without specificity and scientific justification. How specific traits might confer heat tolerance should be discussed and justification given for selected genetic targets. What about the potential to adjust genetically the thermal development clock that governs development rate so that higher temperatures would not result in such a short grain-filling period in wheat, which is a major cause of lower yield with high temperature?There is a strong case for continuous work in lifting wheat yield potential as described in SI7 although the 50% target is completely unrealistic. This is the core business of CIMMYT and the team has expertise in key areas ranging from molecular sciences to crop physiology and breeding. New models of grain yield allow for integration and reflect the current understanding of wheat yield determination. There is a well established network and infrastructure to characterise the elusive GxE component of grain yield, and new technologies seem to be used with clear, breeding-driven focus. Enhancement of photosynthesis through manipulation of Rubisco is a weak component of this SI. Trade-offs and scaling up issues remain fundamental scientific roadblocks to this objective; without addressing them the approach is not likely to succeed and should be dropped.Seed systems issues are presented comprehensively in SI8. After decades of wheat breeding and success in spreading improved varieties to nearly all major wheat growing areas in the developing world, it seems unlikely that seed supply would remain the major constraint. More careful analysis and diagnosis may reveal the problem is in the demand for seed due to information gaps on the part of farmers. Furthermore, the problems related to dependency on public sector for varietal release processes and seed certification are generic to all crops in many developing countries. Therefore the efforts to change seed policies should be common for all CRPs under CRP 3, and be integrated with CRP2 on policies.SI9 with focus on conserving and exploiting genetic resources and characterization is well matched to WHEAT objectives. The emphasis on open access to the raw materials for crop improvement, i.e. genes and knowledge, is timely and relevant. In addition to links with SI5-7, SI9 proposes valuable linkages with S1 and S10. Efforts to refine phenotyping techniques and inclusion of field phenotyping are commendable for closing the gap between the fast advancing molecular sciences and conventional breeding.Enhancing the research capability of partner organisations and training a new generation of scientists, technicians and farmers in SI10 is critical to WHEAT objectives and likely to generate long-term impacts. SI10 is appropriately linked to the other SIs.This CRP builds on current strong partnerships between the lead Centers and NARS, ARIs and the private sector. The CRP guidelines for identifying partners (pgs 30-31) are good. Appropriate partners are essential for success as most SIs depend on partnerships at both early-stage research and at the evaluation and product development phases. Existing networks are of great value to SI10 in training scientists and technicians in developing countries. The Borlaug Institute for South Asia is an exciting new collaborative initiative yet to be established. In general, however, the level of commitment from partner organizations cannot be determined from the proposal. Presumably the CRP will be drawing on outputs from partners produced outside of WHEAT.Regarding partnership structure, three levels of potential engagement are considered-primary research partners (PRPs) that play a role on both the Management Committee and the Oversight Committee (substantial resource commitments and research contributions to the program); research partners and development partners (awarded performance contracts); and stakeholder partners (participants in priority setting and review but not under performance contract). Most of the partnerships, other than PRPs, will evolve from the strategic initiatives. A long list of partners is given for each SI, but many others are envisioned to evolve as research progresses. Within the SIs, research partners are active in planning, implementation and evaluation of the initiatives as part of formal threeyear and annual planning processes. The large number of WHEAT partners (more than 150 organizations worldwide) could lead to trade-offs between management costs and coordination requirements to avoid duplication of activities and preventing important issues falling through the cracks.The proposal includes an extended description of the potential for public-private partnerships (p.19). While the value of these partnerships is evident, it is not clear how they will be developed and incorporated into management and oversight functions.Management and oversight are heavily controlled by the lead Center CIMMYT. Although a program management unit will be formed, its role appears facilitative and no particular staff expertise is identified. The CIMMYT DG, along with the Center's director of research and partnership, are responsible for leading the program both internally and externally. This is worrisome, given that one of only three risks identified in the proposal is -inept or seriously inefficient CRP management combined with inept or seriously inefficient oversight functions‖ (p.58). The research agenda is divided to represent the respective institutional strengths and comparative advantages of the two Centers, but ICARDA's role in the management of the CRP appears to be only somewhat more influential than other PRPs. The danger with this arrangement is that these two Center-driven programs continue to stand as if CGIAR reform never happened. A more proactive management framework is needed to ensure that synergies and cohesion are properly leveraged in this CRP.Questions about the plausibility of impact have been raised above. The description of the program management does not add confidence. The CRP seems to lack sufficient active management to integrate the component elements of individual SIs to design and develop deliverable products. A well established portfolio management process is lacking. Having a CIMMYT staff member chairing the Management Committee has the risk of preventing a distinct identity for the CRP. Cost savings do not justify lack of a dedicated position. It appears that delivery of specific outputs would be delegated to partners, with only annual planning meetings to exchange knowledge on progress. The fact that individual SIs do not have clear leadership of their own, and thus budgets, reduces confidence that WHEAT can become an integrated and cohesive program. Budgets are presumably controlled by the respective Center leaders. The size of the SI teams and whether the teams will have leaders and access to specific management support (communications, technology, etc.) is not spelled out in the proposal. We conclude that overall management at the CRP-level as well as roles for the Management Committee and SI leadership should be strengthened and clarified in the revised proposal.CRP3.1 WHEAT and CRP 3.3 MAIZE assume most of CIMMYT's budget (at 2009 level). The proponents state that implementation of WHEAT (and also CRP3.3 MAIZE) would be put at risk without management costs being covered by the CRP (p.61). This is difficult to understand, however, because these management costs are currently being covered within CIMMYT's budget. Between the two CIMMYT-led proposals, the CRP-accrued management costs total approximately $3.4 million a year. It appears that none of the research conducted by the partners prior to this CRP (largely the same as proposed) had any management costs associated with them other than overhead. Thus it seems unreasonable to claim that the new funding scheme will require substantially more or different management than CIMMYT required in 2009 with a similar level and mix of unrestricted and restricted funding from multiple sources.The gap between what is described as full funding for the proposal from 2011-2013 ($259.5 million) and even the most positive budget scenario for the same period ($150.7 million) exceeds $100 million (Table 7, p.61). Nevertheless, fund raising to bridge this gap is not addressed in management terms. Given the gap between projected and full funding, primary research partners are clearly expected to bring substantial resources to the table. For instance, the inclusion of GDRC of Australia, BBSRC of the UK, and ICAR as potential PRP members assumes relatively large investments from these partners to the CRP. Primary research partners, who are defined by their level of commitment to the project, will play influential roles in priority setting and resource allocation, most directly through membership in the Management Committee. It is emphasised in the proposal (Table 7) that the influence of the CGIAR is proportionate to Window 1-3 funding, which is estimated to be 33% (at most) in the budget scenarios and would plummet if the program were to be fully funded. The proposal would have benefited from a budget illustration showing the program at full funding, indicating either the allocation of additional resources by SI or by region. Although Table 3 includes estimated impacts of full funding, there is no way to gauge whether the addition of resources in one area or another would provide significant leverage in achieving these results. Risks are cited for funding at less than 75% of estimated budget (which is itself less than 60% of full funding), but the strategy and priority for adding funds above the amounts requested, would be useful to see.The CRP lacks a strong mechanism for independent oversight and evaluation. The composition of the Oversight Committee is largely driven by geographic region. Although nominations will emerge from partners and stakeholders, no criteria for membership are listed, nor the terms of reference. The committee has no chair or other designated leader who can provide a measure of balance to the influence of the lead Center's DG or its staff, or provide an independent and knowledgeable level of scrutiny to the work of the Management Committee.The Oversight Committee could play a critical role in fulfilling the need for more independence and fewer conflicts of interest if the proposal included:  A mechanism by which the six regional members can be nominated and appointed in a manner not wholly influenced or controlled by the lead Center  Term limits or a similar mechanism that provides for turnover among regional representatives and encourages individual performance  A committee chair that is nominated from among the committee members and serves for a fixed term  The ability to meet more than once each year, even if one meeting was a video conference  The authority to commission periodic external evaluations of the CRP, including its management and governance","tokenCount":"4254"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/2138739326.json b/data/part_2/2138739326.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..96e659c4e6ad68bb42edb65c21976bcfd55bf0da --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/2138739326.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"54c11cc31e58dd5ad8cbc6290a2cd4f2","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/1fca34f7-62de-438a-9d1a-ce51c273fe18/retrieve","id":"-1006594565"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b2031d08-d11e-48cd-b546-54d942ff0e64","pagecount":"5","content":"PART 1: Description and all information of the outcome/impact reported OUTCOME STORY/IMPACT STATEMENT Market and consumer-oriented product development and optimization interventions encompassing rapid market assessments, sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability, food safety and nutrition quality assessments, processing and production factors assessments, and willingness to pay studies were implemented through private-public partnerships in Malawi and Zambia. Seven small-scale processors improved their product production and marketing -four processors adopted improved and optimized product formulations; one newcomer (processor) entered the bean-based food market; and two improved their processing procedures, production capacity, and marketing process.A rapid market assessment (RMA) conducted by the project observed that very few micro, small and medium enterprises are processing beanbased food products. Lack of bean-processing skills, limited supply of beans, and inadequate awareness about existing bean-based products were indicated as reasons for not producing bean-based products [1]. To change this narrative, the few bean-based food products identified in the RMA conducted in Malawi and Zambia underwent nutritional, sensory, microbial, and functional property analyses [3,6,7]. The rationale was to establish gaps that likely affect their nutritional quality, food quality and safety concerns, potential consumer acceptability, and eventual upscaling and commercialization efforts. Findings from these analyses informed the reformulation of 11 beanbased food product prototypes at Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (LUANAR). The 11 potential prototypes were grouped into four categories: i) three bean-based blended flour formulations; ii) two bean-enriched thobwa beverage formulations; iii) four different precooked, dehydrated beans; and iv) two bean paste formulations [2,3]. These innovations/products are in various stages of development along the project life cycle [10]. The second and fourth category of bean-based products, namely beanenriched thobwa beverage formulations and bean paste formulations, could both be placed at stages 3 (proof of concept) and 4 (validation). These products have potential and have shown consumer acceptability, so require further testing and validation to be propelled to the next project life-cycle stages. The third and first category of bean-based products, namely pre-cooked dehydrated beans and bean-based blended flours, could be placed on stages 5 (selection) and 6 (release). These products have been released and seven processors have adopted them [3,10].Bean-based food products identified during a rapid market assessment in Malawi and Zambia were subjected to nutritional, sensory, microbial, and functional property analyses. Findings from these assessments informed modifications and reformulation of 11 bean-based food product prototypes at Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (LUANAR). The 11 potential product prototypes are grouped into four categories, as follows: i) three beanbased blended flour formulations; ii) two bean-enriched Thobwa beverage formulations; iii) four different precooked, dehydrated bean treatments; and iv) two bean paste formulations [1,2,3,6,7,10]. Another innovation developed at LUANAR, in collaboration with the bean processor Nouriceutic Foods Ltd, is a simple cabinet dehydrator (drier) that uses light bulbs and a fan, as well as other readily available and cheap materials [3,10]. The drier is meant to dry pre-cooked dehydrated beans and other related products. The rationale behind this innovation is to ensure bean drying even during the winter and rainy season for continuous product processing. Processing protocols for pre-cooked beans and bean flours were developed by the project and distributed to processors in Malawi and Zambia [3,10,11]. To understand customers of processed beans at Stage 7 (commercial introduction) of the Project Life Cycle, an experimental auction was conducted on two products: 1) Dehydrated, pre-cooked beans in Malawi and Zambia, and 2) Hydrated, ready-to-eat beans in Zambia. In Malawi, a total of 392 consumers were selected from five districts based on a proportional to size multistage sampling procedure, while 360 consumers were selected in Zambia using similar selection criteria [10]. The experimental auction followed the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism, an incentivecompatible method, to elicit participants' willingness to pay (WTP). In both countries, major consumers of dehydrated pre-cooked beans were identified as bean consuming households with medium income. In Malawi, major customers of dehydrated beans are likely to have a medium-level monthly income (between MK100,000 and Mk 300,000) and a bean consumption frequency of more than twice per week and reside in the central region. For Zambia, processed beans have a broader customer base, starting from low-medium to highmedium monthly income levels. There is a consistent pattern with WTP increasing with income up to the fourth income quintile (ZMW 75001-10,000/month) where it starts to diminish. Consumers with very low monthly income (below ZM 2500) and those with very high monthly income (ZM 10,000) are less likely to be important customers. Women and customers in urban areas are the highest consumers of processed bean products in Zambia [10].Gender relevance: 2 -Principal. Amongst the targeted 7 SMEs, 3 are owned by women. Gender analysis and mainstreaming training were conducted to processors in Malawi and Zambia. Reference: 9a2, 6, 7, 11 Cap Dev relevance: 2 -Principal. The project is also centered on building youth capacity through academic supervision, mentorship and coaching. Reference: 9a2, 6, 7, 8 Climate Change relevance: 2 -Principal. The project is promoting value addition among early-maturing, and drought-and disease-tolerant bean varieties for products that are also climate sensitive. Again, beans, like all legume crops, nourish the soil increasing resilience to climate change. For instance, dehydrated cooked beans cook faster, using less energy during cooking, thereby making them friendly to both the environment and deforestation. Reference: 9a2, 10, 11 Youth relevance: 2 -Principal. All private-sector project partners are youth or have a special focus on promoting youth in their business strategy. Amongst the seven targeted SMEs, four are youth owned. Reference: 9a2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 8, 11Has the effect on different social groups (for example laborers vs landowners, different ethnic groups etc.) been analyzed? Another intervention carried out by the project was a review of policies related to legume processing and value addition with a focus on common beans. Through this intervention the project identified policy gaps related to legume production, processing, value addition, and commercialization. Policies were mainly promoting maize, soybean, and groundnut production. Common beans, pigeon peas and cow peas were not mentioned at all or were passively mentioned in policies for both countries. As a result of the project's policy review activity, two policy briefs (one for Malawi and another for Zambia) and two press releases (one for Malawi and another for Zambia) were developed by the project team. The policy briefs and press releases were disseminated to relevant stakeholders in a bid to create a conducive environment and policies supporting the success of micro-, small-and medium-scale processors.Perisha Agro and Packaging Enterprise, in Malawi, has now replaced its pure bean flour product with beanbased blended flours because they have found that this replacement drastically reduces production costs, while increasing nutrient density, consumer acceptability, and financial returns [3,5]. Nouriceutic Foods, a new player in the processing industry, has adopted the pre-cooked dehydrated beans and is now distributing its product in Malawi [3,10]. In Zambia, Trinity Super Foods were influenced to adopt optimized recipes and processes when producing its bean-based blended flour and pre-cooked dehydrated bean products [3,10]. Full commercialization efforts (stage 7) are currently being conducted by these processors. For the simple cabinet dehydrator (Drier), only one processor (Nouriceutic Foods) is currently using this innovation [3,10]. Although the drier is already in use, stages 4 (validation) and 5 (selection) need to be applied again to ensure efficient commercialization of the product. There are other products that are already optimized at processing plants such as pre-cooked wet beans and those that are yet to be optimized such as bean-based corn flakes and bean noodles [8]. Processors who are already processing pre-cooked wet beans include Sunfresh Africa in Malawi, and Don Products and Beyond Bridge in Zambia [9,10,11,4,2]. The project assisted these processors in perfecting their processing parameters and improving their supply chain models and capacities by linking them to farmers to source high-quality bean grain and assist them with marketing efforts to enhance production. Agriche Foods is interested in venturing into bean-based corn flakes and bean enriched noodles, and they have already developed their own prototypes (stage 2). However, they have already diversified their product portfolio as they have also started processing the blended-bean flours [8].End hunger for all and enable affordable healthy diets for the 3 billion people who do not currently have access to safe and nutritious food. Reduce cases of foodborne illness (600 million annually) and zoonotic diseases (1 billion annually) by one third.Lift at least 500 million people living in rural areas above the extreme poverty line of US $1.90 per day (2011 PPP).Reduce by at least half the proportion of men, women, and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions according to national definitions.Close the gender gap in rights to economic resources, access to ownership, and control over land and natural resources for over 500 million women who work in food, land, and water systems. Offer rewarding opportunities to 267 million young people who are not in employment, education, or training.Implement all National Adaptation Plans and Nationally Determined Contributions to the Paris Agreement.Equip 500 million small-scale producers to be more resilient to climate shocks, with climate adaptation solutions available through national innovation systems.Stay within planetary and regional environmental boundaries: consumptive water uses in food production of less than 2500 sq. km. per year (with a focus on the most stressed basins), zero net deforestation, nitrogen application of 90 Tg per year (with a redistribution towards low-input farming systems) and increased use efficiency, and phosphorous application of 10 Tg per year.Maintain the genetic diversity of seeds, cultivated plants, farmed and domesticated animals and their related wild species, including through soundly managed genebanks at the national, regional, and international levels.PART 3: One CGIAR Alignment SDG TARGETS 2.4 -By 2030, ensure sustainable food production systems and implement resilient agricultural practices that increase productivity and production, that help maintain ecosystems, that strengthen capacity for adaptation to climate change, extreme weather, drought, flooding, and other disasters and that progressively improve land and soil quality.2.5 -By 2020, maintain the genetic diversity of seeds, cultivated plants, and farmed and domesticated animals and their related wild species, including through soundly managed and diversified seed and plant banks at the national, regional and international levels, and promote access to and fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the utilization of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge, as internationally agreed. ","tokenCount":"1709"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/2149904746.json b/data/part_2/2149904746.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bbc79d02e1eb72ca63bb390ed8471aba5ed32310 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/2149904746.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"45c0fc764bb8e89b1e4efb043ee5ef4a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/784f58a2-b080-458f-a687-9d6d615b82df/retrieve","id":"2137490598"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"6b1040d6-360c-4668-b3f6-276e8c6f85e8","pagecount":"2","content":"April 5 th , Nairobi, Kenya. A new research project to tackle malnutrition among Kenya's poorest communities will be launched in Nairobi today. The three-year initiative targeting = women and children aged 6−59 months, aims to make quick-to-cook porridge from at least four food groups, affordable for poor communities.Low dietary diversity among the poor is a key contributor to malnutrition, said the research group. Non-staple grains and legumes like beans can increase diet diversity for a more balanced diet, yet they are often neglected.\"While a family may not have the resources to cook dry beans, vegetables, and cereals three times a day, they can boil this porridge which is bean-based and nutrient dense, affordable, as an ideal supplements in the diet,\" said Christine Chege, an agricultural economist and nutritionist at the International Center for Tropical Agriculture in Nairobi.Researchers aim to benefit 50,000 rural and urban consumers, reaching around five million smallholder farmers in Uganda and Kenya by the end of the project. The goal is to make an affordable, nutritious porridge, while linking farmers with processing companies like East Africa Basic Foods and Lasting Solutions to reach low-income consumers.An analyses of business bottle-necks to bring down costs along the value chain -for example using low-cost, energy-efficient dryers instead of electricity -will be made, and bean farmers will be linked with processors who will buy their products at reasonable prices.Collecting data to get the bigger picture \"Beans are a nutritious food, and provide a low-cost protein for low-income consumers. That's why they are often called a 'poor man's meat',\" said Chege. \"Our research aims to combine beans with other less-known but nutritious foods like amaranth leaves.\"One cup of amaranth leaves -cooked, boiled, and drained -contains 73% of the daily requirement of vitamin A, 90% for vitamin C, 28% for calcium, and 17% for iron. In addition, beans are a good source of vitamins A, K, B6, and C as well as riboflavin, folate, and dietary minerals, including calcium, iron, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, zinc, copper, and manganese.If agriculture is to play a stronger role in improving nutrition, then research must focus more on what happens between production and consumption, say researchers. Evaluating the whole value-chain from farmer to consumer is vital to supply nutritious foods to the poor and evaluate their demand for these foods.","tokenCount":"383"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/2189436140.json b/data/part_2/2189436140.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e86e30d154e85c5513f29d6851f5bbccd7fa124a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/2189436140.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6292ff02fdb4bf33d68d14fea5c996dc","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/8c6afa1e-0588-43eb-96e5-26c1c9dddae0/retrieve","id":"831911616"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"ddf6b8ba-d2f6-425a-b842-413f4e8f1de0","pagecount":"22","content":"Mechanisation is back among top development policy priorities for transforming African smallholder agriculture.Yet previous and ongoing efforts ubiquitously suffer from lack of scientific information on end-user effective demand for different types of mechanical innovations to inform public investment or business development programmes.We assess smallholder farmers' willingness to pay (WTP) for two-wheel tractor (2WT)-based ripping, direct seeding and transportation using a random sample of 2800 smallholder households in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Applying the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak Mechanism (BDM) experimental auctions, we find that at least 50% of sample households in Zambia and Zimbabwe were willing to pay more than the prevailing market prices for ripping. In nominal terms, sample households in Zimbabwe were willing to pay more than those in Zambia for the different services. Empirical results suggest that wealth is the strongest driver of WTP for tillage and seeding 2WT services while labour availability and using animal draft power reduce it. These findings imply a need to (i) raise awareness and create demand for 2WT-based services in an inclusive business manner thatMechanisation is back among top policy priorities to transform African agriculture after a long period of attempts and partial failures. From the assumption that mechanisation can help change (e.g., reduce drudgery by retiring the hoe), intensify and improve agricultural productivity and production in sub-Saharan Africa (Baudron, Misiko, et al., 2019), African heads of state and government affirmed their commitment to include mechanisation as a core component for ending hunger by 2025 during the Malabo declaration in 2014. 1 In this sense, and to transform mostly smallholder farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa, mechanisation is viewed as key to agricultural development. Pingali (2007) characterises past mechanisation efforts in Africa into three epochs between 1945 and 1980s. These mechanisation epochs were led by governments (colonial or post-independence) and provided tractors to individual farmers and in some instances through cooperatives, government-run mechanisation programmes, credit schemes or government hire services. These interventions failed primarily because they only focused on the supply side where the main emphasis was to make tractors available (Pingali et al., 1987), without first understanding farmers' effective demand for tractors and availability of ancillary support services. As a result, and because the demand side for spare parts and after-sale services was largely ignored, the number of tractors plummeted, mechanisation efforts stalled with most of these tractors abandoned (Pingali, 2007) and in some instances stripped for scrap metal. Interest in mechanising African agriculture waned for much of the 1990s and early 2000s (Baudron, Misiko, et al., 2019;Diao et al., 2016;Pingali, 2007). It could be argued that there were no well-thought business models through which tractorisation could be achieved.Given prior challenges, the current drive to mechanise African smallholder agriculture is cautious and aims to address both supply and demand side factors. On the supply side, there is an emphasis on scale-appropriate mechanisation where machines adapt to prevailing farm sizes in the region (Baudron et al., 2015). It is argued that the large four-wheel tractors tried in the past were only suitable for large-scale commercial farming but not suitable for the smallholders. Instead, two-wheel tractors (2WTs) were considered fit for the purpose given the small average farm sizes in the region, low purchase and maintenance costs (Baudron et al., 2015). There are also efforts to develop markets for appropriate machines by supporting research and development (R&D), linking local companies to global suppliers, capacity development and training of private sector to adapt machines and to fabricate some attachments locally to minimise lead times in the supply chains and to provide effective after-sale, maintenance and repair services. Other complementary efforts include creating enabling policy frameworks that address rampant market failures (e.g. unavailability of credit caused by information asymmetry) in the mechanisation subsector and creating 1 31247-doc-malabo_declaration_2014_11_26.pdf (au.int) does not create perverse incentives and (ii) better target mechanisation to operations with comparative advantage, using approaches that bundle 2WT-based and other mechanisation services with asset-agnostic credit schemes or other interventions meant to overcome asset-mediated barriers.demand, mechanisation, targeting, two-wheel tractor, Zambia, ZimbabweQ12, Q18 incentives for private sector participation. An example is facilitating access to credit for machinery and tax rebates on machinery imports (Baudron, Nazare, & Matangi, 2019).On the demand side, a major focus is on demand creation through demonstrating the use and versatility of 2WTs and by making these machines accessible in the local communities through encouraging the establishment of local service providers. To avert disappointments encountered in prior mechanisation efforts, there are suggestions that donors, development partners (NGOs, research organisations) and governments should play facilitatory and supportive or catalytic roles and provide financing options, R&D and an enabling policy and institutional environment that facilitates mechanisation in the initial phases, while the private sector should drive the mechanisation agenda (Baudron et al., 2015;Daum & Birner, 2020;Diao et al., 2016;Pingali, 2007;Pingali et al., 1987).There are several reasons for the current push for mechanisation in Africa. National governments are geared to intensify agricultural production given rising land pressures and food demands amidst climate change, and climate smart agricultural practices such as conservation agriculture are part of national policies in most countries in the region (Giller et al., 2015). One consequence of these efforts is an increase in land prices arising from active land markets (Jayne et al., 2021), rising rural wages (Daum & Birner, 2020) driven in part by out-migration and increased demand for agricultural labour and high land-labour ratios (Diao et al., 2016). Another potential driver for mechanisation is the increased push for conservation agriculture whose minimal land disturbance practices can be accomplished by 2WTs more efficiently while reducing drudgery (Baudron et al., 2015). Other potential drivers include the rapid increase in medium-scale farms (5-100 ha) who are better resourced and the developing rural nonfarm sectors (Jayne et al., 2016). The emergence of medium-scale farms and burgeoning rural nonfarm sectors is absorbing labour in most places, leading to labour scarcity and rising opportunity cost for family farm labour (Jayne et al., 2016). These changes offer great opportunities to leapfrog mechanisation.In sum, these unfolding labour and land market changes in Africa favour capital-using and labour-saving mechanisation options. In addition, improving market access conditions in the region and a nearly doubling of growth in agricultural production value between 2000 and 2018 in sub-Saharan Africa (Jayne & Sanchez, 2021) and improved availability of 2WTs from local private sector dealers (Baudron et al., 2015) can facilitate mechanisation. This optimism is, however, juxtaposed by debates on the extent of the effective demand for mechanisation in Africa (Pingali, 2007) given, for example, rising land-labour ratios and low cropping intensities (Baudron, Misiko, et al., 2019;Binswanger-Mkhize & Savastano, 2017;Sims & Kienzle, 2015). Thus, it is of policy relevance to first ascertain the extent of the demand for 2WT-based mechanisation prior to full-scale interventions. This will also serve to inform spatial targeting on what operations need to be mechanised and where the best-bet interventions sites are. In essence, this analysis provides some guidance in terms of where mechanisation is likely to succeed in southern Africa, using the cases of Zambia and Zimbabwe.While this analysis focuses on 2WTs, we recognise that animal traction is still very common in these countries and it will remain an important source of farm power. As such, we agree with Daum et al. (2022) in stating that animal traction will remain an important part of smallholder mechanisation and with Baudron, Nazare, and Matangi (2019) that animal traction is part of appropriate scale mechanisation. Although evaluating the merits of 2WTs over animal traction or the profitability of 2WTs (see Baudron, Nazare, and Matangi (2019)) or whether 2WTs should leapfrog animal traction (Daum et al., 2022) is beyond the scope of this paper, motorised sources of farm power are becoming more relevant in the context of rising animal diseases and declining animal herds in southern Africa (Baudron, Nazare, & Matangi, 2019). It should also be noted that animal traction is not ubiquitous in southern Africa. Cattle, which is mostly used for traction, are most prevalent in southern Zambia and the central plateau of Zimbabwe (Baudron, Nazare, & Matangi, 2019).Given that the success of any mechanisation effort hinges on there being effective demand for it (Pingali, 2007) and since the service provider model is more appealing than individual ownership of tractors (Baudron et al., 2015;Baudron, Nazare, & Matangi, 2019;FACASI, 2016), we explore the extent to which smallholder farmers are willing to pay for 2WT-based land preparation, direct seeding and transportation services in Zambia and Zimbabwe. This assessment combines what Pingali (2007) calls 'power-intensive operations' such as land preparation (ripping and transportation using a 0.5-ton trailer attached to a 2WT within a 20-km radius) and 'control-intensive' activities such as ripping and hand seeding, and direct seeding. We estimate wilingness to pay (WTP) using the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism (BDM) (Becker et al., 1964) which is incentive compatible because it induces truth-telling and allows individuals to reveal their maximum WTP amounts (Horowitz, 2006). BDM auctions have been used to access WTP in various contexts; for example, see De Groote et al. (2011), Morawetz et al. (2011) and Lusk and Shogren (2007).We contribute to existing literature on smallholder mechanisation in southern Africa by assessing WTP for mechanisation in the context of conservation agriculture systems using an approach that simulates a real market for 2WTs. This approach is necessary given that 2WTs are still not very common in southern Africa and, therefore, allows an ex-ante assessment of potential effective demand. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to use the more efficient, incentive compatible BDM approach to assess WTP for mechanisation in the context of conservation agriculture in the region. This is in contrast to Paudel et al. (2019) who used contingent valuation in a similar analysis in Nepal.Zimbabwe and Zambia are appropriate for this analysis given their long history with agricultural mechanisation from the pre-to post-independence times. Governments led early mechanisation efforts in both countries by providing subsidised or free tractors (Pingali, 2007). To the best of our knowledge, these noble efforts were not informed by rigorous demand estimation. Interest in mechanisation was rekindled in the two countries in the late 1990s and early 2000s driven in part by development organisations, donors, private sector and governments. National credit schemes were setup to help farmers access credit to finance the purchase of agricultural equipment and inputs. An example is Lima Bank in Zambia, which would later close operations in 1997 due to nonperforming loans. Besides, the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) have been at the forefront of promoting appropriate scale mechanisation in the region (e.g. FACASI, 2016;FAO and AUC, 2019).In Zambia, the Farmer Input Supply Response Initiative (FISRI) project and its successor, the Conservation Agriculture Scaling Up (CASU) project implemented by the Ministry of Agriculture with technical support from FAO facilitated access to 60 hp tractors for selected services providers and provided electronic vouchers to participating lead farmers which could be redeemed for tractor-based ripping services and other inputs and implements at participating agro-dealers (Sims & Kienzle, 2015). 2 The projects also provided market linkages for participating farmers. The Conservation Farming Unit partnered with AFGRI Equipment Zambia and John Deere to provide tractors on loan to selected lead farmers who would provide ripping services to other farmers in the vicinity from about 2011. About the same time, the Zambia National Farmers Union (ZNFU) launched a revolving fund that provided loans to farmers to help them acquire agricultural machinery (Sims & Kienzle, 2015). In 2008, the ZNFU partnered with some commercial banks to launch the Lima Credit Scheme which provided loans to smallholder farmers, including for buying machinery (WorldBank, 2019).Experiences from these mechanisation schemes in Zambia are mixed. While some closed due to nonperforming loans, for example, the Lima Credit Scheme (WorldBank, 2019), others have had significant impacts on beneficiaries.For example, Adu-Baffour et al. (2019) found that farmers who received mechanisation services from the AFGRI-John Deere tractor scheme in Zambia significantly increased their household incomes and yield, and were more willing to invest in other inputs like fertilisers. Omulo et al. (2022) also found that hiring four-wheel tractors to mechanise conservation agriculture was more profitable than conventional tillage, again highlighting the potential for mechanisation hire services.Zimbabwe followed a somewhat different trajectory of agricultural mechanisation than Zambia. There have been and still are several agricultural mechanisation programmes focused on large four-wheel tractors and accessories (Shonhe, 2022) in Zimbabwe compared to Zambia. Following pre-independence mechanisation efforts that were tilted towards white commercial farmers in Zimbabwe (Pingali et al., 1987), the post-independence government introduced several initiatives to mechanise smallholder agriculture including the group tractor programme, district development fund, and the agricultural rural agencies (Shonhe, 2022). There have been other schemes introduced more recently, for example, one by AFGRI and John Deere-like the one in Zambia, 3 the farm mechanisation programme funded by the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe and the Belarus farm mechanisation facility to mention a few. 4 Overall, structural adjustment programmes of the early 1990s, the land reforms initiated in the 2000s and other related challenges hampered the success of most of these mechanisation initiatives in Zimbabwe (Shonhe, 2022).Both Zambia and Zimbabwe have benefited from the current surge in 'appropriate scale' mechanisation focusing on 2WTs led in part by international R&D partners and national governments. For example, CIMMYT implemented the Farm mechanisation and Conservation Agriculture for Sustainable Intensification (FACASI) project to promote appropriate scale mechanisation in East and Southern Africa including in Zimbabwe. 5 The project run from 2013 until 2019. 2WTs were part of the mechanisation options promoted by the project through facilitating the establishment of service providers in the project areas. Since then, CIMMYT has implemented other projects that promote the use of 2WTs in conservation agriculture systems including the R4 Rural Resilience project in Zimbabwe and the Sustainable Intensification of Smallholder farming Systems (SIFAZ) project in Zambia. Some of the current efforts are geared towards synthesising and consolidating this large body of information to inform current and future mechanisation efforts in the context of conservation agriculture, sustainable intensification and mechanisation efforts therein. The project from which data for this paper were generated, the 'Understanding and Enhancing Adoption of Conservation Agriculture in Smallholder Farming Systems of Southern Africa (ACASA)', is designed to help understand these complex drivers and codify them into actionable information for research, policy and practice in Southern Africa.These projects and those by other partners like FAO address both demand and supply side constraints to agricultural mechanisation. They focus on demand creation on one side while concomitantly working with suppliers to develop their capacity to offer after-sale maintenance and repair services in the region. The Zimbabwean government has since bought in and plans to invest USD 5 million to import 2WT mechanisation packages to support scaling of conservation agriculture activities in the country. 6 Most of the donor-supported initiatives in Zambia and Zimbabwe aim to crowd in private sector participation to ensure sustainability. Empirical evidence on whether this has been the case remains scanty. Thus, while Zambia and Zimbabwe followed somewhat different trajectories in pushing agricultural mechanisation, both countries have had experiences with government-led and private sector innovations. Both countries currently are focus areas for appropriate scale mechanisation that includes 2WTs. This makes Zambia and Zimbabwe appropriate places to assess demand for 2WT services.The theories of induced innovation (Ruttan & Hayami, 1973) and the evolution of farming systems (Boserup, 1965) can explain mechanisation development and its potential demand. According to the induced innovation theory, changes in the prices of the main factors of production-land, labour and capital-lead to the substitution of scarce and more expensive factors with abundant and cheaper factors. Changes in factor prices lead to innovations that use more of the cheaper factor and less of the more expensive ones. In the case of mechanisation, rising population and the resulting increase in the demand for food, developing rural nonfarm sectors and out-migration work in tandem to raise land and labour prices. In turn, according to the induced innovation theory, this would require substituting capital-using technologies like machines for land and labour using alternatives like hand hoeing and conventional ploughing. This proposition finds support in the different mechanisation trajectories followed by densely populated countries like Japan [and, China and Bangladesh] where labour was abundant and cheap in the 19th century compared with other less densely populated countries in Europe and the US (Binswanger, 1986). Thus, it can be conjectured from the foregoing that labour and land endowments and access to capital matter in farmers' decisions whether to mechanise or not.The Boserup hypothesis suggests that land scarcity will only trigger innovations beyond a threshold that is determined by population pressure. In the absence of population pressure, farmers tend to extensify production before they intensify (Boserup, 1965). The two theories are thus complementary in predicting that mechanisation is only likely to occur with labour scarcity and high land to labour ratios. Other important drivers for mechanisation include demand for labour in nonagricultural enterprises, improved market access (both local and international), demand elasticity for agricultural produce and access to capital (Binswanger, 1986;Diao et al., 2016). We follow the induced innovation theory and the evolution of farming systems and conceptualise that farmers' WTP for 2WT mechanised services is a function of land, labour and capital, market access and other farm and socio-demographics factors.Data used in the analysis were obtained from household surveys conducted in Zambia and Zimbabwe under the ACASA project. A multistage sampling scheme was used. In stage one, one to two districts were selected per agro-ecological zone per country based on the presence of ongoing or past CA interventions. To the extent possible, the two districts were selected to have contrasting market access conditions. In stage two, two or three camps/ wards and villages were selected per district using the criteria above, and in stage three, a random sample of a predetermined number of households was selected for interviews using sampling frames or lists of households per village drawn from village heads and agricultural extension officers.Stages one and two were done in consultation with various national CA stakeholders and government agencies.Study areas in Zambia were selected in consultation with the Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) and the Conservation Farming Unit (CFU), whereas those in Zimbabwe were selected in consultation with the Department of Agricultural, Technical and Extension Services (AGRITEX) and the National CA Task Force.Overall, the study covers 17 districts with 7 in Zambia (Mpongwe, Serenje, Mumbwa, Kaoma, Choma, Siavonga and Chipata) representing three agro-ecological zones and 10 districts in Zimbabwe (Bubi, Chiredzi, Gokwe South, Kwekwe, Masvingo, Matobo, Murewa, Nyanga, Shamva and Zaka) representing five agro-ecological zones. The final sample includes 2862 households of which 1407 households were interviewed from 56 sample villages in Zambia and 1455 from 60 sample villages in Zimbabwe. Sample households were well spread across the countries (Figure 1). Suffice to emphasis here that the surveys were done in areas known to have had large CA investments in the target countries. Such interventions were either ongoing at the time of the survey in 2021 or were active within the past 10 years.There are four outcome variables of interest. These include WTP amounts per ha for ripping only, ripping and seeding, direct seeding and WTP amounts for transportation per 0.5 ton and within a 20-km radius (Table 1). Because BDM auctions simulate a real market, summary statistics (discussed latter) are the most available revealed preferences of the respondents for the services offered and give unbiased WTP estimates, in the absence of actual observations (Lusk & Shogren, 2007).Following the conceptual framework developed above, we controlled for several covariates within the limits of the available data. Even if we do not have factor prices in the data, we attempted to test the induced innovation and Boserup hypotheses by controlling for labour availability (number of adults and number working off farm), whether a household faced labour challenges during land preparation, planting and weeding and whether a household accessed credit. We also controlled for wealth variables using an asset index and a social network index to check if social capital would directly influence WTP. We also controlled for several other socio-economic and demographic variables.Because cognitive ability influences WTP (Lusk & Shogren, 2007), we controlled for whether a household is aware or knows about 2WTs. Since animal draft power is the most prevalent source of farm power in the study countries, we also controlled for whether a household has ever used animal draft power for tillage, planting, weeding and transport. We also controlled for whether a household used minimum tillage (MT), the main component for conservation agriculture. In the spirit of the induced innovation and Boserup hypotheses, we expected households facing labour challenges and land constraints, those who accessed credit and are wealthy to be willing to pay higher amounts. We expected education and age to increase WTP given a higher comprehension capacity and reduced physical strength associated with these variables, respectively. However, the effects of these demographic variables are ambiguous a priori on WTP for transportation. A priori, we expected access to animal traction to reduce WTP for 2WTs.We estimated WTP for appropriate mechanisation in CA systems using BDM auctions. BDM is a simple and intuitive, incentive compatible method used to elicit WTP in applied economics. At the core of BDM is the expected utility hypothesis which suggests that if utilities associated with alternative possible outcomes are known for a given subject, then it is possible to predict their choices (Becker et al., 1964;Kahneman et al., 1990). BDM is thought to be incentive compatible because it induces truth-telling and allows individuals to reveal their maximum WTP amounts (Horowitz, 2006;Lusk & Shogren, 2007). The procedure is simple. After a detailed activity description with examples and trial runs, an individual is asked to 'bid' for the activity. The activity's price is then randomly drawn from a distribution of prices. This distribution of prices is based on actual market prices and is not known to the respondent. If the bid amount is above the price, the individual wins the activity and pays the drawn price or loses the activity, otherwise. Unlike contingent valuation which is hypothetical, BDM simulates a real market where goods and services are exchanged with real money, and therefore, decisions made by participants have consequences (Lusk & Shogren, 2007).To accommodate mechanisation activities and given the scarcity of 2WTs in the study areas and the fact that the survey was done during the dry season, we modified the standard BDM procedures and monetised the services that farmers won. The BDM procedure included 2WT-based per ha ripping, ripping and seeding, direct seeding and transportation for 0.5 tons within a 20-km radius. The modification is such that if farmers won the ripping service, they do not get the actual service but instead win a nontrivial amount of money (about $5) that is enough to cover rural daily wage labour. Here are the steps followed in conducting the BDM exercise with farmers:• Step 1: We described a farm operation service (ripping, ripping and seeding, and direct seeding) including how long it will take to do the operation per ha and transportation of 0.5 ton within a 20-km radius. We showed farmers pictures of operations in case they were not familiar with the services described. This process continued until farmers were comfortable with the four options.•Step 2: We then asked farmers to bid for each service. That is, farmers indicated how much they can pay for the service, considering how much it would normally cost to do the same using alternative means, for example, manual labour or animal draft power.• Step 3: Once steps 1 and 2 are completed for each service, one of the services was randomly picked to be played for real money. Here, farmers randomly selected a number between 1 and 4, where 1 was for ripping, 2 for ripping and seeding, 3 for direct seeding and 4 for transportation.•Step 4: Once a service is randomly selected to be played for real cash in step 3, a price for the service is drawn from an unknown (to the farmer) distribution of prices for the service. 7 If a farmer's bid is higher than the randomly drawn price, she/he wins a token worth $5. Thus, farmers had an incentive to bid their true WTP.Because BDM auctions do not give starting values, the WTP amounts given by respondents are dispersed (Table 1).We can write a parsimonious estimable function of WTP as follows:The distribution of prices is unknown to the farmers but not the researcher. These were constructed based on prevailing average prices gathered for the four services in the study areas prior to the survey. Only 15%, 17%, 11% and 48% won bids for ripping, ripping and seeding, direct seeding and transportation, respectively. The n reduced after trimming off the top 95th percentile for Zimbabwe and 99th percentile for Zambia who WTP amounts seemed implausible. Retaining these in the analysis does not significantly change the empirical results. The social network index is a composite of variables including the numbers of years the household head has lived in the current village, the number of relatives and nonrelatives that a household can rely on in and outside their village, number of friends in leadership positions, membership to a farmer organisation and whether the household head or spouse is related to the chief/headman. Both indices were constructed using factor analysis.Abbreviations: MT, minimum tillage; WTP, willingness to pay.a The asset index is a composite variable constructed from ownership of productive assets such as ploughs, oxcarts, rippers, hand hoes, knapsack sprayer, shovel, bicycle, vans/lorry, ax, and so on.where WTP ij is the willingness to pay for household i for mechanisation services j, j = 1-4. The vector W captures labour availability, wealth (asset index) and X includes all socio-economic and demographic variables. Credit, laborC, know, landh, socialk adp and used_MT capture access to credit, labour constraints, knowledge on 2WTs, landholding size, social capital, use of animal draft power and min till, respectively. We also controlled for country and district dummies to capture fixed effects, for pooled and country specific regressions. All variables in Equation ( 1) are as defined in Table 1.Because all outcome variables have a few zeros and are very dispersed and because the price ranges were set within what was reported in pilot projects and by the nascent service providers, we estimated Equation (1) using the Tobit regression model with both below and upper censoring. The lower censoring point is zero while the upper censoring point is the 95th percentile of each outcome variable for the pooled sample and for each country. We considered observations above the 95th percentile to be outliers and possibly are protest bids.Prior to assessing demand for mechanisation, we first assess labour shortages for different farm operations among sampled households and the prevalence, use and knowledge of different kinds of mechanisation options among sample farmers.Weeding and land preparation are the top farm operations for which most farmers face labour constraints (Table 2).About 62% and 43% of sample farmers in Zambia and Zimbabwe, respectively, faced labour constraints during weeding. This is followed in second place by land preparation for which 50% and 20% of the farmers faced labour constraints in Zambia and Zimbabwe, respectively. In Zambia, between 20% and 32% of farmers interviewed faced labour challenges for transportation, harvesting, planting and fertiliser application and shelling and/or threshing.Harvesting and planting and fertiliser application are the other important farm operations where at least 14% of sample farmers faced labour shortages in Zimbabwe.Labour constraints for land preparation appeared more of a problem in Serenje and Mpongwe districts in Zambia, and in Murewa and Bubi districts in Zimbabwe. Weeding-related labour constraints were more prevalent in Kaoma and Serenje in Zambia and Nyanga and Murewa in Zimbabwe. In terms of what to mechanise and where, these findings imply that weeding and land preparation should be prioritised in both countries and in districts where these are major constraints if there is enough demand (more later). Thus, both power-and control-intensive operations need to be looked at simultaneously instead of the former first and then the latter, as suggested in Pingali (2007). Addressing both power and control intensive operations simultaneously makes sense in the context of conservation agriculture systems where labour bottlenecks are a huge challenge in the absence of herbicides or when herbicides are improperly used leading to low efficacy in controlling weeds.Draft animal power remains the most known, used, owned, accessible and affordable form of farm power in Zambia and Zimbabwe (Table 3). Over 90% of the sample farmers have used draft animal power. About 37% and 57% of interviewed households in Zambia and Zimbabwe, respectively, own draft animals. Despite being widely known by more than 90% of the farmers, only about 15%-16% of interviewed households have ever used four-wheel tractors and about 1% own these tractors in Zambia and Zimbabwe.The 2WTs are more popular in the study areas in Zambia, known by some 62% of the sample households compared to only 32% in Zimbabwe. However, only about 2% of the sample households have ever used 2WTs and less than 1% own them. These findings have three implications on the current push for 2WTs in southern Africa.First, there is need for more work to raise awareness about and create demand for 2WTs in the region, as suggested by others, for example, Daum and Birner (2020) Note: Usage (ever used) and ownership are computed for those who know a particular farm power. Accessibility was computed for those farmers who did not hire mechanisation services for 2020/2021 season but have used before, while affordability was computed for those who know about the mechanisation option and think it is possible to hire. ^ statistically invalid, n < 30.development partners can play this catalytic role in this initial phase, but they need to let the private sector take over once effective demand is created. Second, because animal draft power is still widely used in the region, getting farmers to transition to 2WTs will require demonstrating the added benefits associated with the switch and making more 2WTs available to rural service providers. These added benefits could be in terms of time saving, incomes and land and labour productivity realised from using 2WTs in contrast to the status quo (e.g. Baudron, Nazare, & Matangi, 2019). Assessing the added benefits of 2WTs compared with animal draft power is beyond the scope of the current paper but a good research area for future work. Readers are referred to Baudron et al. (2015), Baudron, Misiko, et al. (2019) and Baudron, Nazare, and Matangi (2019) on why 2WTs and some benefits of 2WTs. Our analysis focuses on 2WTs and not large four-wheel tractors because the former are more suitable for small landholdings and are more affordable (Baudron et al., 2015). Moreover, four-wheel tractor operators face higher transaction costs in providing services to dissipated smallholder farmers (Adu-Baffour et al., 2019).Of course, rising labour wages and land scarcity may quicken the transition to more intensified forms of production. But the current low cropping intensities and land-labour ratios (Baudron, Misiko, et al., 2019;Binswanger-Mkhize & Savastano, 2017) and the perception that land is abundant cast doubts. And lastly, drawing from the power shifts in Europe, Japan and United States (Binswanger, 1986), it can be conjectured that 2WTs even if adopted widely will co-exist with animal draft power for some time. In this case, mechanisation should be targeted for specific operations where there is the highest comparative advantage. Clarifying this will require more comparative research on returns to animal draft power-versus 2WT-based as well as 4WT operations, and not comparing returns from 2WTs versus manual systems.On average, the sample households in Zambia were willing to pay USD19, USD28 and USD26 per hectare for ripping, ripping and seeding, and direct seeding, respectively, and USD6 for transportation per 0.5 ton within a radius of 20 km (Table 1 and Figure 2). Farmers in Zimbabwe were willing to pay more in nominal terms at USD51, USD69 and USD58 per hectare for ripping, ripping and seeding, and direct seeding, respectively, and USD12 for transportation of 0.5 tons per 20-km radius. Overall, at least 50% of sample households in Zambia and Zimbabwe were willing to pay more than the prevailing market prices for ripping, and 5%-10% were willing to pay more for direct seeding in the F I G U R E 2 Average willingness to pay (USD/ha) for different mechanisation services in Zambia and Zimbabwe.two countries. Our WTP estimate for 2WT ripping of USD19 is much lower than the USD31 per ha for 4WT-based ripping, but our WTP estimate for 2WT direct seeding of USD26 is close to the estimate USD31 service charge per ha for 4WT direct seed in Zambia (Omulo et al., 2022).District level WTP amounts add some nuances. In Zambia, the sample farmers in Kaoma, Mpongwe, Mumbwa and Serenje were willing to pay higher amounts on average for ripping and seeding, and direct seeding than in any other districts (Figure 3). This is not surprising as these have been among the districts where recent mechanisation initiatives in the country were implemented and where more than 50% of sample households lacked labour for land preparation (Table 2). Interviewed farmers in Kaoma, Mpongwe, Mumbwa and Serenje were on average willing to pay USD15-USD25 per ha for ripping, ripping and seeding and direct seeding (Figure 3) and have the highest WTP amounts for all field-based operations. Despite over 30% of farmers in Choma and Chipata districts indicating that they lacked labour for land preparation (Table 2), they have the least WTP amount at about USD17 per ha for ripping.Prevalence of animal draft power in these districts could partly explain the results. The WTP for transport of 0.5 tons within a 20-km radius hovers between USD5 in Chipata district and USD11 in Mpongwe, where 15% and 34% lacked labour for transportation during the 2020/2021 cropping season, respectively.There are small differences in the WTP amounts between districts in Zimbabwe. Bubi, Matobo and Murewa districts, where more than 24% of farmers interviewed lacked labour during land preparation (Table 2), had the highest WTP for ripping of over USD50 per ha. Farmers in the same districts and Shamva were willing to pay higher amounts for ripping and seeding and direct seeding than farmers in other districts (Figure 3). Despite 23% of farmers in Chiredzi district indicating that they lacked labour for land preparation (Table 2), they have the least WTP amounts for all 2WT-based tillage systems. This could be explained by the higher cattle density in Chiredzi District and lower value of crop production given that the district is mostly arid. These findings have implications for targeting of mechanisation for the types of services analysed in this paper.In terms of where to target, Kaoma, Mumbwa, Mpongwe and Serenje are good candidate districts in Zambia given that farmers in these districts are willing to pay higher amounts for ripping, ripping and seeding, and direct seeding.Among study districts in Zimbabwe, the niche seems to be in Matobo, Bubi and Murewa districts. When compared with provisional engineering costs (minimum industry estimates of service price to cover fabrication costs and mark ups for engineering and service providers) and market prices (actual prices obtained on the market for the service) for the different services, the WTP estimates for ripping are 27% higher than existing market prices in the sample districts of Zambia (Figure 4). The WTP for ripping is 21% higher than the market price in Zimbabwe. These WTP amounts for 2WT ripping are slightly higher than market prices for animal traction in Zambia and Zimbabwe. In Zambia, animal traction ripping costs about USD15 per ha compared to a WTP of USD19 for 2WT ripping. Farmers in Zimbabwe are willing to pay USD51 per ha for 2WT ripping, and animal traction ripping costs USD43 per ha. However, market prices for animal traction ripping and 2WT ripping are virtually the same in within the study areas in each country. When considering market fundamentals and based on the best available market data, these findings suggest that 2WT-based ripping services have a business case given that the WTP amounts are higher than market prices in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Farmers in Zambia and Zimbabwe are willing to pay 27% and 18% more per ha for 2WT-ripping than the existing market prices for animal traction ripping services.Based on the market data gathered, transportation and direct seeding services are not considered viable in the areas where the survey was conducted in both countries. These findings merely show that farmers (or customers)interviewed have lower WTP for transportation and direct seeding. A major limitation for transportation is that while our survey only shows a snapshot of farmers' WTP for transportation for a single service at the time of the survey, in reality, transport services are offered throughout the year. As such, the average WTP estimates for 2WT-based transport services mask a lot of variability, and the cumulative income from transport services per year might be substantial. The findings here do not invalidate the potential of transportation services from a service provider perspective who would offer such services throughout the year as opposed to seasonal tillage and seeding services. The demand curves are downward slopping as would be expected for all the 2WT-based services (Figure 5), implying that the proportion of farmers willing to pay for these services reduces as the payment amount increases.As stated before, the average WTP amounts are higher in Zimbabwe than in Zambia.Several factors determine farmers' WTP for mechanisation in the pooled sample (Table 4), in Zambia (Table 5) and Zimbabwe (Table 6). As expected, education is associated with higher WTP for direct seeding in the pooled sample (Table 4) and transportation in the Zimbabwe sample (Table 6). Educated households are also expected to have a better ability to process new information and gain faster understanding of innovations such as mechanisation, leading to higher WTP for such. As such paying for 2WT-based services maybe a preferred option for such households. The age of the household head is negatively associated with WTP for ripping and transportation in the pooled sample (Table 4) and in Zambia (Table 5), ripping and seeding in Zambia (Table 5) and for transportation in Zimbabwe (Table 6).This suggests that households headed by younger and perhaps more enterprising heads are more likely to use 2WTsfor MT services and transportation.Households headed by females are willing to pay significantly lower amounts for ripping and seeding and direct seeding. This could be explained by the fact that either these activities are deemed to be male dominated activities or perhaps, that female headed households do not have as many endowments or control over funds as do male headed households to afford to pay for these services. This result is suggestive of gendered effects on farmers' WTP for 2WTs-based mechanisation services that should be addressed at promotion ensure gender and social inclusivity.This is contrary to Baudron, Misiko, et al. (2019) who found no gendered gaps in labour and land productivity (and not WTP), but it is consistent with other literature that confirm the persistence of gender gaps in agriculture in the region (Andersson Djurfeldt et al., 2013;FAO, 2011).Households with more adult males are willing to pay significantly lower amounts for ripping and ripping and seeding in the pooled sample and in Zimbabwe (Tables 4 and 6). This finding suggests that labour availability reduces the willingness to pay for 2WT-based ripping services. In a sense, this is in line with predictions of the induced innovation hypotheses-even if our analysis uses only proxies of factors prices (Hayami & Ruttan, 1971). Off farm work can have contrasting effects on WTP for mechanisation. It is expected to increase WTP in places with high opportunity cost of labour and to lower WTP in places where the opportunity of labour for working on the farm is low. Our results for the Zambia subsample conform to the first line of thought. Having more household members working off farm significantly increased WTP for all services offered (Table 5). Another possible explanation for the positive effects is that off farm work helps improve liquidity and raises the opportunity cost of family labour. This in turn enables and induces farm households to hire in 2WT-based services. While positive for transportation in Zimbabwe, off farm work significantly reduces WTP for direct seeding (Table 6). This is suggestive of low opportunity cost of labour for direct seeding done with different options such as manual labour or animal traction in Zimbabwe.T A B L E 4 Tobit model average partial estimates of the determinants of smallholder farmers' WTP for 2WT-based services, pooled sample.( Wealth is the most significant driver of which seems logical as those households with more wealth assets can afford to outsource 2WT-based services. Households with a high asset index are willing to pay significantly more for all 2WT-based services in the pooled sample (Table 4) and for ripping and seeding in Zambia (Table 5) and ripping, ripping and seeding and direct seeding in Zimbabwe (Table 6). This is an important finding and implies a need to deliberately craft inclusive business models for 2WT-based and other mechanisation services to farmers. If access to these services remains wealth-/asset-mediated (implying binding liquidity constraints that only asset-endowed households can overcome), business models that bundle these services with asset-agnostic credit schemes or other interventions meant to overcome asset-mediated barriers should be considered. This is key for the sustainability and profitability of the current wave of scale-appropriate mechanisation in the region. However, if viewed from another angle of gender and social inclusion, this finding calls for innovative approaches to ensure that mechanisation is accessible to As expected, having ever used animal draft power for tillage and transportation services significantly reduces WTP direct seeding and transportation (Tables 4-6). Given the prominence of draft power as a source of farm power in Zambia and Zimbabwe (Table 1; FAO and AUC, 2019), this result suggests that animal traction and motorised mechanical options will co-exist in the study countries depending on the context. This finding is in line with suggestions by Daum et al. (2022) who argue that 'there is no blue-print for best technologies but only best-fits' and that animal traction remains relevant in the ongoing mechanisation drive in sub-Saharan Africa.In line with a priori expectations, we find that farmers that used MT, the main component of conservation agriculture, were willing to pay significantly higher amounts for 2WT-based ripping, and ripping and seeding services in the pooled sample and Zambia subsample (Tables 4 and 5). This could be explained by the fact that such farmers are already aware of conservation agriculture and the benefit of 2WTs in implementing CA practices and therefore maybe more willing to pay for mechanised MT and seeding services.The effects of access to credit, our measure of capital, are mixed. It increases the WTP amounts for ripping and seeding in Zambia (Table 5) but reduces WTP for direct seeding in the pooled sample (Table 4) and in Zimbabwe (Table 6). Because this measure of access to credit does not really say much about the cost of capital, it is difficult to read much into its effects. Suffice to mention that it would appear ripping and seeding requires more cash outlays than direct seeding.The findings in this paper reflect demand from the perspective of clients or customers, that is, how much customers would be willing to pay for 2WT-based mechanised services at the time of the survey. These results should not be conflated with profitability assessments from the perspective of 2WT owners or service providers who, for example, might provide transportation services throughout the year as opposed to season tillage and planting services. Mechanisation is back among top policy priorities for transforming African agriculture. Past failures in mechanising smallholder agriculture imply a need for systematic analyses to guide policy on targeting and assessing where and for what operations there is effective demand. This paper used the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM) mechanism experimental auctions that simulate a real market to assess farmers' willingness to pay (WTP) for Two-Wheel Tractor (2WT) -based mechanisation services in 7 and 10 districts of Zambia and Zimbabwe, respectively, with a random sample of about 2800 smallholder households. We focused on ripping only, ripping and seeding, direct seeding and transportation using a 2WT.We found that weeding and land preparation are the top two farm operations where most farmers face labour constraints and therefore need to be mechanised. About 62% and 43% of sample farmers in Zambia and Zimbabwe, respectively, faced labour constraints during weeding, while 50% and 20% of the farmers faced labour constraints during land preparation, respectively. These differences are observed across districts and between the study Despite the 2WTs being more popular in Zambia where they are known by some 62% of sample households compared with only 32% in Zimbabwe, only about 2% of sample households have ever used 2WTs and less than 1% own them in study areas across the two countries. On average, the sample households in Zambia were willing to pay USD19, USD28 and USD26 per ha for ripping, ripping and seeding and direct seeding, respectively, and USD6 for transportation per 0.5 ton within a radius of 20 km, whereas those in Zimbabwe were willing to pay more in nominal terms at USD51, USD69 and USD58 per ha for ripping, ripping and seeding and direct seeding, respectively, and USD 12 for transportation of 0.5 tons per 20-km radius. About half of sample households in and Zimbabwe were willing to pay more than the prevailing market prices for ripping, and 5%-10% were willing to pay more for direct seeding in the two countries. Among the study districts, the most promising districts for 2WTs (where demand is highest) include Kaoma, Mpongwe, Mumbwa and Serenje in Zambia and Bubi, Matobo and Murewa districts in Zimbabwe.Compared with market prices for the different services, the WTP estimates for ripping are 21%-27% higher than existing market prices in the sample districts in Zambia and in Zimbabwe. Thus, when considering market fundamentals, these findings suggest that there could be a business case for 2WT-based ripping services in Zambia and Zimbabwe. However, animal traction remains the most prominent source of farm power, and market prices for animal traction ripping and 2WT ripping are virtually the same in both countries. We also found that farmers that have used animal draft power before are willing to pay significantly less for 2WT-based services.Wealth and binding labour constraints are the strongest drivers of farmers' WTP for 2WT-based mechanisation services. Familiarity with conservation agriculture practices and off farm work is associated with higher willingness to pay. These findings call for action on several fronts: First, there is need for more work to raise awareness on mechanisation and create demand for 2WTs in regions where there is comparative advantage. Given disappointing results for conventional demand creation models, this calls for different approaches. Where WTP is already high and is consistent with potential market price, the activities should be on inclusive market deepening and business development, whereas in areas with low WTP, focus should be on early demand creation based on inclusive business models that do not create perverse incentives or expectations or stunt effective demand. Because animal draft power is still widely used in the study countries, 2WTs will likely co-exist with animal traction for long given the low WTP for 2WTs in areas where animal traction is prevalent.Second, since 2WTs will likely co-exist with animal draft power systems for some time, mechanisation should be targeted for specific operations where there is the highest comparative advantage. Clarifying this will require more economic analyses on returns to animal draft power-versus 2WT-based operations. Third, as weeding was rated to have the most labour constraints, there is need to develop appropriate machinery and tools for mechanical weed control beyond herbicides, cultivators and hand hoeing (even if that is construed as shallow weeding) to address labour bottlenecks and to assess the most cost-efficient method to control weeds. Finally, there is need to target farmers who can pay for the services. This will crowd in private sector players who are crucial for sustainable smallholder mechanisation in the region. In doing so, other models such as group hire services and/or incentives to tractor owners can be pursued for more inclusive mechanisation. This implies a need to deliberately craft inclusive business models for 2WT-based and other mechanisation services to farmers. If access to these services remain wealth-/asset-mediated only, business models that bundle these services with asset-agnostic credit schemes or other interventions meant to overcome asset-mediated barriers should be considered. A conducive policy environment that facilitates mechanisation through tax incentives and smart subsidies is required to sustain the current appropriate scale mechanisation in the region.There is scope for more work on the economics of 2WT hire services. While there are positive indications (e.g.Baudron, Nazare, & Matangi, 2019) and positive demand in this paper, there is need to evaluate the profitability of 2WT hire for the full range of land preparation, planting, weeding, postharvest and transport services. This should be compared with similar services provided by animal draft power where applicable, to address the main question of whether 2WTs can leapfrog animal traction.","tokenCount":"8161"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/2194362256.json b/data/part_2/2194362256.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5612e8f3406bc9f7627eca9dd6a742cfc78a544a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/2194362256.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"6b7f5744e0aed54ca26eab8069beee3c","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/9971cc6b-c692-4140-b036-a0edf1403d62/retrieve","id":"624670363"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"c7303c1b-d3cd-47bf-8a35-6aeee97d81f7","pagecount":"12","content":"All varieties in this catalogue are orange-fleshed, palatable, with medium to high dry matter content and high in beta-carotene, the vitamin A precursor. Children like these sweetpotatoes as they are not very dry.Except for Zondeni, all varieties are early to medium maturing and tolerant to sweetpotato viruses and weevils.Mitundu ya mbeu ya mbatata yofiira mkati imeneyi inapangidwa ku Malawi konkuno ndi Department ya kafukufuku mu unduna wa Zamalimidwe. Boma linabvomereza mitundu isanu mu chaka cha 2011, ndipo Zondeni mbeu yomwe inali ndi alimi kale inabvomelezedwa ndi boma mu chaka cha 2008. Mayina a mbewu zimenezi anaperekedwa ndi alimi mogwirizana ndi kayikidwe, kakomedwe komanso kawonekedwe ka mtundu wa mbewu iliyonse.Mitundu yonse ndiyofiira mkati, yaufa, ndiponso ndiyotsekemera tikamadya. Kuonjezera apo, ili ndi michere ya Vitamini A yochuluka.Kupatulapo Zondeni, mitundu yonse ndiyocha msanga komanso yopilira ku matenda ndinankafumbwe wa mbatata.All the varieties were bred in Malawi by DARS and released in 2011. The variety names were given by local farmers and they relate to behavioral characteristics of each variety.Mitundu ya mbatatayi inapangidwa ku Malawi ndi DARS mu chaka cha 2011. Mayina a mbewu zimenezi anaperekedwa ndi alimi mogwirizana ndi kayikidwe komanso kawonekedwe ka mtundu wa mbewu iliyonse. One small sweetpotato is enough for a child. For 6 month babies, try mashing and feeding boiled orange-fl eshed Sweetpotato.Vitamin A is essential for everyone, to build their body, improve their vision and protect them from illness. Vitamin A is found in foods such as orange-fl eshed sweetpotatoes, dark green leafy vegetables, mangoes, pumpkin, eggs, liver, milk, fortifi ed sugar, and fortifi ed cooking fat and margarine. Sweetpotato leaves are rich in vitamin A, B, iron and proteins.Adding a small amount of oil or foods with fat, like avocados and groundnuts, to vitamin A rich foods helps the body to use more of the vitamin A found in these foods.Kudya mbatata ya kholowa yofi ira mkati imodzi ya sayizi yapakatikati tsiku lililonse ndi yokwanila kuti ipeleke vitamini A amene amafunika kwa munthu wamkulu. Mbatata imodzi yaying'ono ndiyokwanira kwa mwana.Mwana akakwanitsa miyezi 6, mukhoza kumukanyila ndi kumudyestsa mbatata yophika.Vitamini A ndi ofunikila kwa aliyense, kuti amange matupi, maso aziwona bwino, komanso kuteteza ku matenda.Vitamini A amapezeka muzakudya ngati mbatata ya kholowa yofi ira mkati, masamba obiliwira, mango, mawungu, mazira, chiwindi, mkaka, shuga wolembedwa tseketseke ndi mafuta ophikira ndi sitoko owonjezeredwa vitamini A. Masamba a kholowa ali ndi michere ya vitamini A, B ndi ironi yambiri. Kuwonjezelako mafuta ophikira pang'ono kapena zakudya ngati mapeyala ndi mtedza, ku chakudya choti chili ndi vitamini A wambiri, zimathandiza kuti thupi ligwiritse bwino ntchito vitamini A amene amapezeka mu chakudyacho. ","tokenCount":"428"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/2194596804.json b/data/part_2/2194596804.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e6866ba2645ddcdcc703c9751b4dcd9e3d8f076e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/2194596804.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"db2b5b7fa15436467c19124734408b94","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/57833d53-8e02-47e5-8696-222bb476c5bf/retrieve","id":"1089348499"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"16dd9473-1129-40d9-a0e2-00a60fc217a7","pagecount":"55","content":"research and technological innovation system. The strategic objectives of FECYT are: (1) to contribute to the course of the scientifi c and technological progress of the Spanish system in order to improve the communication among all agents in the system; (2) to act as a platform of encounter, analysis and interdisciplinary and intersectorial debate for the scientifi c, technological and business communities in the country; and (3) to promote the dissemination of knowledge in matters related to science and technology with the goal of creating a scientifi c and technological culture among citizens.It is more than 50 years since James Watson and Francis Crick published the now famous double helix structure of DNA, and almost 40 years since the plant breeding efforts that started the Green Revolution. In the meantime, much has changed both in molecular biology and in plant breeding. Molecular biologists can now read the genetic instructions of any organism almost at will. With the advent of novel tools such as DNA microarrays and massively enhanced computing power they will be able to move rapidly from the sequence to a good understanding of the organization and function of the genome underlying specifi c metabolic pathways. Plant breeders have developed unprecedented abilities to create novel genetic combinations, using both updated traditional breeding methods and more direct manipulation of the DNA. They have also adopted molecular tools such as markerassisted selection to speed the development of improved varieties.As plant breeding comes to make more and more use of molecular biology, it is becoming clear that the fundamental science may also have a much greater role to play in the use, conservation and management of plant breeding's raw material: genetic diversity. The inherited differences between individual plants or groups of plants are the basis of all improvements sought by plant breeders. Much of that diversity is threatened by changed farming practices and environmental changes and, perhaps ironically, by the spread of the very improved varieties whose existence depends on this diversity.IPGRI has always been dedicated to the conservation of diversity, not for its own sake but so that it can be used by farmers, breeders and others to improve the productivity and sustainability of farming systems and thus to make a contribution to the well-being of people, especially in developing countries. Having helped others to establish and maintain collections of diversity-ex situ in genebanks and in situ and on farms-we now accept that in future the effective use of this diversity is going to assume greater importance. Molecular techniques have a lot to offer.With this in mind, it seemed opportune to convene a meeting of experts from both ends and the middle, as it were, of the spectrum. Genebank curators and molecular biologists, and representatives of other interested disciplines, came together to exchange information, to listen to each other's requirements and capabilities, and to sketch out ways in which they could be useful to one another. This publication represents some of the fi rst fruits of these collaborations, setting out paths and directions that participants can explore together.I am confi dent that these collaborations will be of mutual benefi t in the future, making both the use and conservation of genetic resources more effective. I hope too that when our successors 50 years from now look back they will see this meeting as something of a turning point too. Together, natural diversity and molecular methods will help national agricultural research systems, including their conservation programmes, as well as the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research to achieve their goals: to increase food security, to alleviate poverty and to do so in a sustainable manner.This presentation is a product of three days of discussion held during an expert consultation meeting in November 2002 in León, Spain. The meeting was organized by IPGRI for the System-wide Genetic Resources Programme (SGRP). It brought together scientists from different CGIAR centres, national agricultural research programmes, universities and the private sector.The meeting's participants agreed to make the topics discussed available to a wider public by publishing in IPGRI's series Issues in Genetic Resources. Together with Coosje Hoogendoorn and Jan Engels, we put together an outline covering the main topics and recommendations that had arisen in the meeting's discussions. Contact was made with participants interested in contributing a paper or willing to provide consultancy.The presentation aims to cover those signifi cant issues that developed as a result of introducing molecular technologies into the fi elds of germplasm and genebank management in such a way that they are likely to affect the future strategies and activities of these disciplines. We hope the ideas presented in this publication will help develop a vision of the genebanks' future role in an era of enormous development in molecular biology and genetics.We would like to give special thanks to the contributors of the papers in this publication: C. Richards, R. Ortiz, J. Engels, A. Graner, K.J. Dehmer, T. Thiel, A. Börner, S. Hamon, E. Frison, L. Navarro, T. Fulton and S. Kresovich. We also extend our appreciation to those participants who, although they did not contribute papers, provided signifi cant input by offering their perspectives to the discussions held during the meeting: J.I. Cubero, O. de Ponti, E. Dulloo, M.E. Ferreira, P. Freymark, C. Hoogendoorn, J.L. Karihaloo, J.M. Martínez Zapater, W. Roca, N.R. Sackville-Hamilton, B. Skovmand, V. Villalobos and X. Zhang.We also extend our appreciation to IPGRI's Communications Services, who helped bring the publication into being, Lynn Menéndez at CIAT's Communications Unit and Elizabeth McAdam who helped with the production of this document.Ex situ collections of plant genetic resources (PGR) began with the botanic gardens of the Middle Ages and evolved during the late nineteenth to early twentieth centuries into so-called 'introduction stations'. At that time, no special criteria existed for conservation methodologies, given that the intention was essentially to use germplasm rather than conserve it.The advent of modern plant breeding brought with it a greater need for diversity in breeding materials. Concurrently, novel varieties, particularly hybrids, became widely used because of their higher yields. This, in turn, led to large-scale replacement of traditional varieties, even crops, and rapidly diminishing on-farm sources of potentially valuable genetic resources. This genetic erosion raised concerns for the future availability of PGR.In response, the introduction stations became genebanks, which gave plant breeders easier and quicker access to a wider spectrum of genetic resources. Genebanks began to take on the additional role of being repositories of threatened germplasm materials likely to be useful to humans. Several national genebanks were established, among which were the N.I. Vavilov Research Institute of Plant Industry (VIR, St Petersburg, Russia), fi rst established in 1894; the Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK, Gatersleben, Germany) in 1943; and the National Seed Storage Laboratory (NSSL, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA) in 1947.In the 1960s, the fi rst international genebanks, like those of the CGIAR, were created. In 1974, the IBPGR (now IPGRI) was established and, with it, a coordinated effort to collect threatened germplasm. A network of base collections was set up, and a start made to develop information systems to enhance germplasm use by facilitating its distribution and exchange.Germplasm collection evolved from unsystematic, opportunistic and ad hoc approaches to well-planned, ecoregional or crop-oriented initiatives. Generalized germplasm explorations developed into well-informed, targeted collecting activities with specifi c purposes. Many countries set up national genebanks to service their public breeding programmes. Extensive ex situ collections became established for small, easy-to-store seeds, such as those of major cereals. Signifi cant advances were made in developing storage methodologies for recalcitrant seeds and vegetatively propagated species. Even so, these collections are still relatively limited both in number and in the genetic variation they represent.Since the late 1980s, the fi elds of molecular biology and genetics have undergone signifi cant developments, most of which have offered new ways of solving biological questions in general and those of agricultural sciences in particular. At fi rst, technologies to assess polymorphism-that is, the genetic variation among samples or individualswere designed. They permitted analysis of genetic diversity and, thus, the creation of modern linkage maps, which became increasingly saturated, as more powerful marker tools became available.Genetic maps led to the development of physical maps and the construction of many types of DNA libraries, all with the main goal of speeding up the cloning of individual genes of agronomic importance. Simultaneously, much progress was made with high-throughput technologies for gene expression analyses that helped uncover candidate genes involved in central metabolic pathways. DNA sequencing technology also improved from manual to sophisticated automated methods, facilitating increased throughput of efforts to decipher genomes of organisms from all kingdoms. Consequently, gene function could be better studied, and advances were made in bioinformatics, the discipline of I. Introduction Maria Carmen de Vicente generating, collecting, storing and using data from genomic projects to achieve research objectives.Knowledge has also expanded in areas such as understanding the potential of wild species to signifi cantly contribute to traits of agronomic importance. A large array of possibilities has also opened up through the disciplines of comparative genetics and genomics. These new opportunities allow us to envisage a signifi cant impact on germplasm conservation activities, which would certainly benefi t from better-informed management and increased use of PGR.When considering these circumstances, in 2002, IPGRI called for a meeting of experts to consult them on the implications that developments in molecular genetics may have for the future of ex situ germplasm collections. The meeting brought together 22 participants, all experts in germplasm, genebanks or molecular genetics. They came from universities, research institutes, national seed repositories, the private sector, IPGRI and four other CGIAR centres (CIMMYT, CIP, IITA and IRRI). The countries they represented were Brazil, China, France, Germany, India, Mexico, the Netherlands, Spain and the USA.The meeting dealt with various aspects of the evolving role of genebanks with respect to developments in the molecular sciences, including: (1) extending the concept of 'client' to include not only the plant breeder, but also the basic scientist and molecular geneticist; (2) issues of intellectual property protection of genetic components of accessions; (3) the need to standardize molecular technologies; (4) the prospects of genebanks developing new services; (5) the range of germplasm materials that future users are likely to need; (6) comprehensive capacity-building; (7) the impact of scientifi c advances on the technological divide already existing between rich and poor countries; (8) networking needs; (9) the importance of continued phenotyping by genebank curators; (10) the need for increased documentation capacity; (11) access to information; and (12) the role of CGIAR in general and IPGRI in particular.At the end of the meeting the experts compiled 18 recommendations, which refl ect the likely trends in future management of ex situ conservation of genetic resources. These recommendations are listed below, according to the four main areas as given in the meeting: research and management of genebanks, information technologies and bioinformatics, training and capacity-building, and policy and intellectual property rights (IPR).• The effi cient and effective exploitation of the genetic diversity found in large genebank collections consumes considerable time and resources. Hence, molecular technologies should be used to create representative subsets of either the entire or a core collection. However, phylogenetic characterization should continue to be done for the whole collection, not just for the core or subset.• Advances in genomics of major crops and model species should be applied to improve understanding of intraspecifi c variation in species, and to cover new species.• Marker-based technology should be implemented in genetic resources management. Robust and affordable technologies should be promoted to improve genebanks' quality of output. In certain cases, the private sector could be approached to collaborate in cropcentred consortia and to provide information on reliable markers for their use in the public domain.• In certain cases, it is advisable to wait before molecular techniques are implemented. This would allow costs to come down and throughput capacities to increase further, hence preventing loss of resources through investments made in acquiring technologies that might rapidly become obsolete.• Studies should be carried out to defi ne the total variation of a given species so that at least the smallest possible set of representative individuals or accessions is conserved. Such core collections, however, do not remove the need to maintain large, or larger, collections to cover variation at all levels (e.g. genes, individuals). In addition, priority in conservation should be given to materials that contain alleles that are locally common, but globally rare.• Because (1) wild ancestors of cultivated species contain vast amounts of additional genetic diversity, and (2) the effi ciency of transferring their desired genes is significantly increased by applied marker-assisted backcrossing, efforts to collect, characterize and evaluate accessions of wild relatives of crops should be substantially increased.• Because neither conserving all living species ex situ nor converting the planet Earth into one protected area is feasible, well-defi ned regions in different parts of the world (i.e. the 'hot spot' zones) should be designated as protected areas. Better links must be established between in situ and ex situ conservation.• Precise and extensive phenotyping (i.e. the characterization and evaluation of morphological, agronomic, physiological, pathological and biochemical traits) should continue to be a major activity of genetic resources repositories. Molecular technologies must be adopted as a supporting tool that complements phenotypic screening, but does not replace it.• No single organization can be expected to do everything. Hence, genebank curators must seek to implement new molecular technologies through collaboration with each other and with molecular geneticists, bioinformaticists and public-private crop-centred consortia.• Consortium networks between genebanks, breeding and molecular genetics programmes must be promoted and established. Such collaboration is essential to efficiently exploit genetic diversity in wild relatives of crops. It is expected that genebanks will receive an increased number of requests for wild species.Novel genebank services • In the future, emphasis in requests is expected to increase on specifi c traits, quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and alleles. Genebanks must be prepared to expand their documentation and service tasks accordingly, for example, by providing not only information, but also DNA samples, as well as seed samples.• Substantial progress has already been made in bioinformatics outside the genetic resources community. Curators should seek collaboration with existing bioinformatics programmes to integrate molecular data (both marker and sequence data) with phenotypic and genebank management data.• Genebanks should seek to cooperate with each other across national boundaries to develop central germplasm databases, including both traditional germplasm data and molecular data for individual crop genepools. Comparative genetics will most likely play an important role in germplasm management, characterization and use if this information is well organized and becomes publicly available.• Action should be taken to promote the synthesis of ongoing work and implement fi ndings and practices gathered through the use of model and globally important species.• Crop-centred consortium networks should be organized to promote the use of common molecular technologies and their standards in genebanks. In addition, specifi c bioinformatics applications will be needed to create common standards of germplasm data management and documentation.• Comprehensive training should be offered and implemented in developing countries to build up genebank human resources in molecular genetics. Courses should include basic principles of biology, genetic resources management, experimental design, data analysis and genomic sciences.• Regional collaboration among institutions in the South should be promoted. The CGIAR, as a partner in consortia of germplasm and genomic projects, should provide leadership in the appropriate integration of modern genetics and genomic developments and tools into the conservation, characterization, evaluation and utilization of crop genetic resources.• New issues related to access and benefi t sharing will undoubtedly arise as a consequence of research and information generated that result from the application of molecular technologies to germplasm materials, as well as tools. Consequently, timely workshops must be held to generate the appropriate knowledge for addressing these issues, thus helping to solve confl icts that may prevent germplasm materials from fl owing.Many issues were discussed in our experts' meeting, which can be considered fundamental in defi ning IPGRI's approach to the role of genebanks in the next 10 years and, as such, are deeply embedded in IPGRI's overall strategy as an international centre with a mandate for conservation and use of PGR. The following fi ve papers will be a valuable reference for those interested in genebanks and their relation with the modern, fast-moving fi elds of the molecular sciences. Brief summaries of the discussion papers that follow this introduction and that arose from the 2002 experts' meeting are presented below:Chapter II aims to justify the incorporation of molecular technologies into genebank management activities as the only means by which to comply with the objective of making genetic diversity useful for plant breeding and basic research. It points out the significance of discovering meaningful variation in wild species, and the value of using marker techniques to organize germplasm. The effects of these techniques on guiding collection strategies and data distribution are described. The potential of comparative genetics, the need for well-established databases and data standardization are discussed, together with the role of comparative genetics in accelerating useful gene discovery. These activities should always be backed by good phenotyping and traditional breeding programmes.Chapter III examines how molecular technologies may help discover the relevance of hidden characters in germplasm, especially in wild and weedy germplasm. Such discovery, in turn, determines the importance of maintaining germplasm in ex situ collections worldwide. From a wider perspective, the paper focuses on different aspects of germplasm management that, with the aid of molecular tools, will benefi t decision-making on the extent and composition of collections.By using real examples and figures, Chapter IV deals with novel solutions to traditional germplasm management practices such as taxonomic identifi cation, duplication of accessions and verifi cation of identity after regeneration or multiplication. The paper also points out the importance of taking into account those technical aspects involved in the effective management of molecular resources and data. Finally, the paper reflects on unsolved questions and issues such as the technological divide between developed and less developed countries, the fact that most available fi nancial resources are poured into only a few major crops, the need for appropriate guidelines and international coordination, the likelihood that genebank services will extend to provide DNA samples as well as traditional materials, the need to create links between different sources of genebank documentation and, lastly, bioinformatics.Chapter V discusses the need to build networks, and indicates how important is the role of the genebank curator, who has a central position in relation to the community of users. Simultaneously, the diffi culties of linking with different scientists and conveying appropriate information are recognized. Consequently, on studying recent examples in genomics, suggestions are made to reduce existing gaps and ensure desirable connections between curators, breeders and molecular scientists.Capacity-building is the topic of Chapter VI, which demonstrates a clear need for it in light of the expanding genebank clientele.Comprehensive training for curators and related staff is essential to help close the technological divide. Networking is seen as having a special role, and as being effectively conducted by the CGIAR centres.In a real sense, genebanks are a study in contingencies. The fact that heritable genetic variation is the basis for adaptation (and crop improvement) has served as a rudimentary and diffuse guide to the assembly of the large ex situ collections developed over the last century. In many respects, the acquisition and maintenance of genetic diversity has been motivated more by the certainty of loss of local landraces and the vulnerability of wild populations in the face of increased habitat loss than from any specifi c evidence for agricultural worth. Moreover, the cost of storing and maintaining large collections is an investment that seems particularly cost-effective, compared with the risk of losing these valuable genetic resources (Pardey et al. 2001).While Vavilov's original premise-that the collection of wild relatives is critical for agricultural improvement-has greatly infl uenced the scope of worldwide collecting efforts, the active use of these resources to develop modern varieties has been largely unsuccessful. Reasons may include the need for prebreeding lines that serve as a fi rst step in backcrossing programmes and the inadequate characterization of germplasm. The net result is that, for most domesticated crop species, pedigrees can be traced to a handful of genetic lineages.Genebanks have an obligation to make their genetic diversity useful and accessible for breeding and research. Large collections are under increasing pressure to become efficient at reducing redundancy, and documenting the variation they contain, lest they become relegated to the level of 'seed morgues'. Increasingly, this assessment has been augmented by the use of molecular markers that quantify the genetic diversity within and between accessions. Several works have detailed the philosophy behind optimizing collections to ensure diverse genetic representation through either the creation of core collections or some form of hierarchical sampling (Crossa et al. 1994;Brown and Marshall 1995;Hayward and Sackville-Hamilton 1997).This paper aims to highlight several technical and analytical advances that have enormous potential in promoting the use of this diversity for breeding. It also identifi es several points of synergy between large-scale genomic projects and genebank management and use.Mather and others (Mather 1941) put forward the paradigm that most complex traits are under the control of many genes with small additive effect. This paradigm has yielded to a more nuanced one of molecular characterization of phenotypic traits (Mackay 2001). Empirical data suggest that the allelic effects on a trait value are distributed as an exponential function, where a few genes control most phenotypic effects and other associated genes have an increasingly smaller effect.High-density linkage maps have enabled researchers to identify genes having major effects (i.e. QTLs) on several complex plant traits (Tanksley 1993). Large-scale sequencing efforts to compile the complete Oryza and Arabidopsis genomes have provided more than just data on these species; they have also provided a framework for a whole host of associated inquiry that will have impact on the way genebanks provide information.As large biological databases of genomic linkage maps and expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences become more accessible, the technical process of locating QTLs in model systems has become routine. These advances have proved to comprise a powerful new tool in characterizing plant genotype-phenotype relationships. Overall, empirical evidence suggests that much of the genetic variation useful to agricultural improvement is not recognizable in the plant phenotype. Instead of screening for promising phenotypes, the future may rely more on allele mining of wild germplasm guided by some information on phylogeny, population structure and genetic diversity. Most modern varieties have a very narrow genetic pedigree and use exotic germplasm.National Center for Genetic Resources Preservation, USDA-ARS, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA Although labour intensive in a breeding programme, alleles of wild germplasm have the potential to produce substantial payoffs in phenotypic response.Examples of breeding for a particular trait by searching for alleles of the underlying QTLs in phenotypically unpromising wild germplasm have underscored the critical importance of wild germplasm and the genetic diversity it represents to agriculture (Tanksley and McCouch 1997). While alleles of important QTLs are not restricted to the genepools of domesticated taxa, their phenotypic expression in wild genetic backgrounds may be variable. The fi eld of quantitative genetics has moved from an era where complex statistics were used to physically locate these loci to the more complex task of dissecting their epistatic interactions in different genetic backgrounds (Mackay 2001).Genebanks offer a key link in this process by providing the raw material for these kinds of breeding programmes. However, the relationship between genome projects and genebanks can be even more synergistic. The increased pace of plant genomic studies offers genebanks a set of useful, well-characterized loci to characterize more accurately standing diversity, and to detect historical relationships among lineages and patterns of molecular evolution and selection that have occurred at the DNA sequence level. Indeed, it is only through an evolutionary framework that the signifi cance of these large genome initiatives will be realized (Charlesworth et al. 2001). Signifi cant advances in the fi eld of comparative genetics, molecular phylogenetics and coalescence theory will all affect the way genebanks collect and distribute data.Although relatively few plant taxa have yet been intensively sequenced and mapped, Brassica, Populus (poplar), Medicago and Lotus are being sequenced. Oryza and Arabidopsis serve as primary templates for the plant genome. The completed sequences have yielded a wealth of molecular marker polymorphisms, including insertions of transposable elements, small insertions or deletions, tandem repeats and single nucleotide polymorphisms that are useful for fi ne-scale mapping of phenotypic traits in these species.A powerful tool of genomics, and the hallmark of bioinformatics, is the ability to effi ciently compare the sequence of any gene to that of any other. Effi cient query and comparison software, increases in database sequence holdings and large increases in computer-processing speed have all contributed to substantial changes in the way data are annotated, analysed and disseminated. One profound result of the mapping effort in cereal crops, including wheat, maize, rice and other grasses, is the remarkable conservation of gene content and gene order through the 60 million years of speciation events in the Poaceae. The exact collinearity of these genomes is perturbed by translocations, deletions, duplications and other mutational events over time, but large regions of chromosomes show high degrees of similarity (Gale and Devos 1998;Paterson et al. 2000).This homeology (vestiges of direct sequence homology from these species' common ancestor) suggests that intensive sequence analysis in one species can have benefi cial effects on the mapping of other species. The comparative method can be used to infer physical map locations of genes in other taxa (Brueggeman et al. 2002). As genetic maps from a variety of species are aligned, the patterns of similarities and differences emerge. These comparisons have important implications for understanding the evolutionary trajectories that shape genetic diversity in plants.Research initiatives such as the development of comparative database structures systematically exploit molecular linkage map and sequence data from different taxa to understand several evolutionary mechanisms, including the rate of heterogeneity among lineages, convergent evolution among genes and functional genomics of orthologous genes in different taxa (Ware et al. 2002). The prospect of regions of synteny among diverse taxa bodes well for gene discovery and may greatly affect the speed and effi ciency of mapping studies in wild taxa that previously had no genomic analysis.One particularly profi table use of comparative genomics contrasts wild and domesticated sister taxa to identify genes that may have undergone strong selection during domestication (Vigouroux et al. 2002). Domesticated lineages have several selected phenotypic traits that may become manifest in genomic scans for selection. These types of comparisons are possible only with sophisticated analytical tests for neutrality of polymorphisms at the sequence level. When studying molecular evolution, one assesses changes in sequence divergence to accept or refute patterns consistent with neutral variation at equilibrium between drift and mutation. Inferring processes that give rise to observed patterns of polymorphisms is a central objective of molecular evolutionary biology.Selective, demographic and random processes can all play important parts in shaping DNA sequence polymorphisms. Several tests have been developed to detect the effects of some of these processes (Tajima 1983;McDonald and Kreitman 1991;Fu and Li 1993). In addition, a stochastic model of genealogical descent known as the coalescent provides a framework for analysing the polymorphism data currently observed. This analytical approach puts forward a null model based on a continuous-time Markov process for generating random genealogies under certain population parameters.Gene genealogies produced in this way are random outcomes of an underlying evolutionary process that can be compared with the observed sequence polymorphisms. This enables the researcher to accept or refute specifi c models of evolutionary change and, as such, the genealogies comprise a powerful simulation tool for hypothesis testing and exploratory analysis. In the study mentioned above by Vigouroux et al. (2002), both neutrality tests and coalescent simulations were used on simple sequence repeat (SSR) polymorphisms within EST sequences in maize and teosinte. Their data identifi ed several genes that were implicated in the domestication of maize and therefore had important agronomic value.It is noteworthy that in crop species under artifi cial selection, numerous QTLs have been attributed to regulatory genes (not just structural genes), demonstrating the ability of plant regulatory genes to infl uence quantitative phenotypic variation, in addition to their previously demonstrated impact on discrete traits (Doebley and Lukens 1998). By extension, in natural systems, intraspecific phenotypic variation important to ecological interactions may also be controlled by regulatory loci. Regulatory alleles affecting ecologically important traits such as fl ower shape and symmetry, infl orescence architecture, corolla pigmentation pattern, fl owering phenology and fruit size have been identifi ed. Experiments are being conducted to examine the micro-evolutionary processes affecting the distribution of these alleles (Purugganan 2000).Molecular marker technologies are increasingly being used in the genetic resources arena to quantify the levels of genetic diversity within and among accessions and to increase the effi ciency of collection management (van Treuren et al. 2001). These techniques usually rely on the frequencies of neutral markers such as those generated through random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), amplifi ed fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP), SSR and other sequencebased methods that seek to quantify variation at variable loci. This distinctly prospective method is used to cluster the current genetic diversity in a way that facilitates representation in ex situ collections (Bretting and Widrlechner 1995;van Hintum and van Treuren 2002).The data from these studies have had signifi cant impact on our ability to infer genetic relatedness, and demographic histories of populations and species. In wild lineages, the pattern of neutral variation captured through these markers may provide a framework for ex situ management but the functional 'ecotypic' variation-the potentially adaptive variation among accessions-may not be so easily revealed (Reed and Frankham 2001; but see Merilä and Crnokrak 2001).In a sense, neutral variation has been widely used as a tractable surrogate for the functional genetic variation that underlies quantitative traits associated with adaptation and future evolutionary potential. Although molecular characterization of the plant phenotype is still emerging (Purugganan and Gibson 2003), comparative approaches and the development of large bioinformatics data sets in model systems will enable the execution of population genetic studies of ecologically or agronomically important traits.In terms of genebank management, emphasis will increasingly be given to maintaining genetic diversity at key loci that control important traits of agronomic interest. Molecular tools may not only infl uence the assessment of broad patterns of genetic diversity but may also be critical in modelling gene genealogies of key functional loci that have been shaped through selection and drift in natural systems (Hey and Machado 2003). As comparative studies increase and more traits are genetically dissected, the panels of functional genes used to screen germplasm will increase. Analytical techniques for revealing the signature of selection at these loci may not only be important in choosing unique accessions to include within an ex situ collection, but may also be important tools for ensuring that diversity is maintained at an acceptable level over time.Because seeds deteriorate during storage, samples must be regenerated before viability becomes critically low. Each round of regeneration exposes the accession to sampling error, causing genetic drift (loss of alleles), possible selection (changes in specifi c allele frequencies) and contamination (novel alleles introduced). Comparisons between diversity measures across regeneration cycles are few (Wu et al. 1998;Chebotar et al. 2002), but they demonstrate that collections are not static and even accessions of domesticated species can show substantial genetic changes within a few generations. The challenge to genebank managers is to disentangle the stochastic and deterministic elements in these dynamics.While breeding structure and demographic histories (such as rapid changes in effective population sizes) are expected to affect all markers in similar ways, functional loci (expressed or regulatory), subject to selection, show high rates of gene-to-gene variation. Comparisons among species with different breeding systems and life history traits may offer genebank managers important conceptual guidelines about which type of accessions are particularly prone to genetic erosion and which are not. The benefi ts of undertaking genetic diversity studies in functional genes in model systems may be better management practices that maintain long-term accession integrity (van Tienderen et al. 2002).The acceleration of genomic data puts genebanking in a particularly vital position for future gene discovery and agricultural improvement. The linkage of model systems to wild germplasm can be thought of as an iterative process. Model systems provide a framework for gene identifi cation and synteny. These loci will become increasingly incorporated in marker panels to monitor and maintain diversity in a variety of accessions. Both neutral marker and specifi c loci are used to infer the historical genealogies of these loci and also to refi ne phylogenetic relationships between taxa. The use of novel QTL alleles retrieved from wild germplasm may implicate additional loci critical to some phenotypic trait such as another gene in a metabolic network that can be subsequently mapped and characterized in the model system.With increasing sequence-based information of QTLs of agronomic importance, genotyping panels for genebanked accessions will greatly increase the accessibility and the effi cient maintenance of large ex situ collections.The future will bring an increase in genotypic data, but the critical importance of plant phenotyping and traditional plant breeding will not diminish. Without expert evaluation for traits in the fi eld, mapping studies cannot proceed. In addition, the critical need for prebreeding lines in which to evaluate the effect of novel QTL alleles will only increase. Molecular marker-assisted breeding can be highly effi cient, but it is breeding all the same and requires the skill of researchers with whole plant and breeding experience.The use of genomic data in genebank management also puts a heavy priority on bioinformatic solutions that incorporate data from sequences to fi eld characters and descriptor data. The ability to link heterogeneous data sets requires a high degree of data standardization. Sequence data may become the gold standard, rather than genotypes based on fragment analysis. Similar database structures are currently being implemented in medical applications where the connections between clinical and genetic data are vital to therapeutics and gene discovery.In the plant germplasm community, it may only be a matter of time before these database structures are used routinely to weave together data from the NCBI, Gramene, SINGER and GRIN databases. Whatever the eventual data retrieval system, molecular technologies will continue to play an important role in making genebanks accessible for agronomic improvement.Genebank curators are interested in ex situ conservation of plant genetic resources because genetic diversity is continuously being lost in farmers' fi elds and in nature. Genebanks are reservoirs of biodiversity and sources of alleles that can be relatively easily retrieved for genetically enhancing crops (Ortiz 2002). Efforts have been made to collect threatened landraces, cultivars that were becoming obsolete, genetic stocks and, increasingly, wild relatives of cultivated species. All these materials are important for crop improvement because breeding gains rely largely on access to genetic variation in the respective crop genepools. If genes available in wild species are to be put into a usable breeding form, then the long-term research agenda must include the development of advanced breeding lines with the desirable genes in a suitable genetic background (i.e. prebreeding must be carried out).Ex situ collections are usually established either through collecting or assembling through exchange with existing collections, followed by rejuvenation or regeneration of seed and other propagules. Traditionally, the routine operation of genebanks also includes activities such as characterization, evaluation and documentation (Engels and Wood 1999;Ortiz 1999;Engels and Visser 2003). Frequently, though, characterization and especially evaluation were left to plant breeders and other users of germplasm. The lack of relevant information on the material for potential users has been judged to be the cause of the low use of accessions conserved in genebanks. This, together with the fact that accessions with proper characterization data increase the interest of the molecular geneticists, is leading to renewed attention by genebanks to characterization activities. To facilitate this work IPGRI, in collaboration with researchers from other organizations worldwide, has developed descriptor lists for about 90 crop species (for example Allium: IPGRI/ ECP/GR/AVRDC 2001).Analysis of genetic variation in germplasm collections generates an added value for genebanks, making this research a good investment. Well-documented analysis of the number and types of useful polymorphisms allows genebank curators to offer specifi c accessions with the desired characteristics to plant geneticists, who can then select materials tailored to their objectives and needs.Despite the relatively high costs as well as the technical challenges involved, regeneration and multiplication are accepted as routine and essential activities by most genebanks. In more recent years, several genebanks have made signifi cant investments to determine their collections' genetic diversity to improve germplasm management, including the establishment of core collections and the development of improved parents and sometimes even of new cultivars.An adequate documentation system is an essential prerequisite for the effective management and subsequent use of genetic resources. Faster and more reliable computers allow researchers to manage and analyse larger amounts of data more easily, and publish catalogues and reports. Genebank documentation has been further enhanced with advances in information and geographic information systems (GIS) technology. Computerized documentation systems, and additional information obtained through GIS and/or from DNA marker technology, can help plant explorers search for sites where specifi c genes may be found. The increasing opportunities of linking different types of data from unrelated sources for one and the same accession or species greatly facilitate the use of conserved genetic resources for crop improvement and other research activities in general.In summary, genebank curators can signifi cantly contribute to the use of the conserved wild and cultivated genetic resources through adequate management practices. An increased application of molecular genetic III. Genebank management and the potential role of molecular genetics to improve the use of conserved genetic diversity Rodomiro Ortiz † and Jan Engels ‡ tools will further facilitate the use of germplasm in breeding efforts and add new value to the existing collections.Over the past 15 years or so increased attention has been given to the conservation of genetic resources in their original habitats surroundings where the material obtained its distinctive characteristics, i.e. in situ and onfarm, respectively. In particular, the conclusion of the Convention on Biological Diversity in 1993 gave a boost to in situ conservation efforts. The conservation of crop genetic resources in farmers' fi elds allows continuing selection in diverse environments and with different selection pressures, and has relatively low direct costs. It also allows people to maintain control over their genetic resources.In situ conservation can help preserve the co-evolutionary dynamics between crops and their wild relatives and pathogen populations of pests and diseases, which is maintaining the dynamic genetic interactions that permit micro-evolutionary changes in the host-disease system. Indeed, the co-evolution in a wild host and its resident pathogen population runs parallel to evolutionary changes in the pathogen population infecting crops. Such changes can be a response, for example, to the introduction of new cultivars containing introgressed wild resistance genes (Prescott-Allen and Prescott-Allen 1988). Likewise, pathogen biotypes from the wild alternative host can invade crops, eliciting a response reaction by wild resistance gene(s), already incorporated into improved cultivars, to the new crop pathogen population.In view of the fact that most of the crop genetic resources are still being 'conserved' in farmers' fi elds and that the capacity of genebanks is usually limited, the linkages between on-farm conservation activities and genebanks are increasingly being recognized to be of critical importance. As a consequence, an active facilitation of germplasm movement between these two systems is of vital importance to both.In the past, genetic diversity in wild relatives of crops and, to some extent, in wild species was predominantly the basis of the search for useful genes in resistance breeding (Lenné and Wood 1991), particularly when resistance levels to pests and diseases available in the primary (and sometimes secondary) genepool were low. Cooper et al. (2001) demonstrated the importance of using germplasm from wild relatives in base-broadening efforts through population management. Discovery and incorporation of new genes from wild relatives therefore provides perhaps one of the few means of sustaining crop improvement in the longer term. Although durability of resistance cannot be predicted (Johnson 1992), the use of increased genetic diversity through preventive breeding as part of the crop improvement effort may help buffer against crop losses arising as the pathogen population changes (McIntosh 1992).Germplasm enhancement using genes from wild relatives is not an easy process, but many parents with wild genes have become available (Ortiz 2002). Backcrossing followed by selection has been the most common method for introgressing genes from wild germplasm into breeding materials. This activity has been termed 'prebreeding' or 'germplasm enhancement', an essential step in crop improvement, as well as the most promising route to increasing the use of wild germplasm. However, problems occur such as linkage drag, sterility, small sample size of the interspecifi c hybrid populations obtained and restricted genetic recombination in subsequent generations.Despite its constraints, genetic enhancement using wild germplasm shows some success. For example, the ICRISAT genebank maintains about 2500 accessions (i.e. about 2% of all accessions) of wild relatives, and wild and weedy species of sorghum, pearl millet, groundnut, chickpea and pigeon pea. Screening of this germplasm has identifi ed several sources of resistance to important pests and diseases. Transfer of new cytoplasmic male sterility to pigeon pea and pearl millet, and the development of chickpea with enhanced yields and pigeon pea with high protein were achieved through conventional backcrossing at ICRISAT (Ortiz 2002).Another good example is the conservation and use of wild and weedy genetic resources of rice at IRRI. Numerous disease-resistance genes have been incorporated, together with other traits, into breeding material that IRRI distributes to national rice research institutes worldwide for further use. All recently released breeding material from IRRI contains one or more genes from wild relatives of rice (R. Sackville-Hamilton, IRRI, pers. comm.).The importance of wild and weedy germplasm for breeding programmes is demonstrated by the fact that more than 15.7% of germplasm accessions with known status and maintained by CGIAR centres are either wild relatives or weedy materials (S. Gaiji, IPGRI, pers. comm.). According to data from the SINGER database maintained by IPGRI (Table III.1), a signifi cant fl ow of wild and weedy germplasm moves from the CGIAR genebanks to users worldwide. It is acknowledged that the relative importance of wild and weedy germplasm is rising, possibly because of the new opportunities that molecular genetic tools offer to exploit genetic diversity. In addition, marker-assisted backcrossing substantially increases the effi ciency of this breeding approach for transferring desired genes and helps preventing linkage drag (Tanksley et al. 1989).Mendel discovered the principles of heredity at the end of the nineteeth century and, from the beginning of the twentieth century, the world has seen genetics rise as a scientifi c discipline. Among its outstanding discoveries were DNA as hereditary material (1944), the double helix structure of the DNA molecule (1953), cracking of the genetic code (1966), isolation of genes (1973) and application of DNA recombinant techniques (from 1980 onwards) (Ortiz 1998;Engels and Visser 2003).Allozymes were available as the fi rst biochemical genetic markers in the 1960s and were amply used by population geneticists in their early research. In the 1970s, restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) and Southern blotting were added to the geneticists' toolbox. Taq polymerase was discovered in the 1980s, and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) developed shortly afterwards. Since then, marker analysis, based on PCR, has become routine in plant genetic research (Ortiz and Crouch 2001).Furthermore, new marker systems have been developed based on high-density arrays or 'gene chips', allowing thousands of genes to be arranged in small matrices (or chips) that are probed with labelled cDNA from a tissue of one's choice. DNA chip technology uses microscopic arrays of molecules immobilized on solid surfaces for analysis. An electronic device connected to a computer may read this information and analyse it. We may speculate that in the future this technology will also facilitate genetic resources management in genebanks.Genomics research integrates genetics with informatics and automated systems to elucidate the structure, function and evolution of past and present genomes. Among the most dynamic fi elds of agriculture and crop improvement are the sequencing of plant genomes, comparative mapping across species with genetic markers, and objectiveassisted breeding after identifying genes or chromosome regions in accessions for further research.Likewise, molecular markers are becoming 'descriptors' that offer reproducible results for characterizing genotypes. Molecular markers are important tools for genebank management, particularly because they can be used to estimate genetic relationships between accessions within a germplasm collection. Unique genotypes can be identifi ed and preserved, or gaps in the collection identifi ed with the aid of DNA markers, which can be used to optimize the management of genetic diversity. Moreover, as mentioned above, DNA markers provide a means of monitoring and facilitating the introgression of genes from wild species into cultivated genepools.Furthermore, knowledge on conservation of gene order, advances in genomics and bioinformatics will allow a much better understanding of available genes and their function in well-studied crops or gene discovery in other research-neglected tropical crop species (Mahalakshmi and Ortiz 2001;Mahalakshmi et al. 2002). For example, researchers might be able to identify and characterize useful genomic regions conferring a specifi c trait in crops. Then, appropriate test materials would be chosen to assess the relevance of these genomic regions in each targeted crop in relevant environments.As a result of the present knowledge, the concept of genepools now includes transgenes, as well as native and exotic genepools that are becoming available through comparative analysis of plant biological repertoires. Gene chips and transposon tagging will provide new dimensions for research on gene expression. Molecular biologists study not only individual genes but also how circuits of interacting genes in different pathways control the spectrum of genetic diversity in any crop species. Genomics may accelerate the identification of important genes available in genebanks, and facilitate their utilization through transformation, without barriers across plant species or other kingdoms of living things. Perhaps, one day, it will be possible for the genes providing extreme drought tolerance of pearl millet or cowpea to be introgressed into other cereals or legumes to achieve more water-effi cient crops. This will have great consequences for the way genebanks operate.The sequencing of entire crop genomes opened new frontiers in the conservation of plant biodiversity and crop genetic enhancement. Recent advances in gene isolation and sequencing in many plant species seem to justify a futuristic vision that, within a few years or possibly decades, genebank curators will complement their large cold stores of seeds with crop DNA sequences that will be electronically stored and easily accessed by users through the Internet (Ortiz 1998(Ortiz , 1999)). This form of characterization of plant genomes will ultimately create a true genebank, possessing a large and easily accessible inventory of major genes of today's largely non-characterized crop genepools.Nonetheless, collections of seeds and other propagules of comprehensively studied stocks should be maintained because plant geneticists, the main direct users of germplasm maintained by genebanks, need such germplasm for their work. In fact, known important genes are only a small percentage of the total genetic information that makes up a crop plant, including gene complexes that are not yet understood and will be diffi cult to 're-compose' if not available as genetic stocks in genebanks.Likewise, fi nding new genes in not-yetcharacterized germplasm that is maintained in one or more of the about 1300 genebanks or germplasm collections in the world adds value not only to that collection or collections, but also to the electronic sequence data that could make up the genebanks of the future. Genetic resources available in genebanks are the best source for gene discovery, especially if and when the traditional collections have been phenotypically characterized and additional relevant information is properly documented.Unknowingly, and usually unintentionally, accessions can be duplicated within a collection, between collections and between genebanks. These duplicates should be identifi ed if and when economically defendable to avoid waste of capacity (Engels and Visser 2003). Putative duplicates can be identifi ed on the basis of passport data, but additional assessment or confi rmation of the duplication status will be needed through phenotypic and genotypic characterization, using descriptor lists in the fi eld and biochemical or increasingly DNA fi ngerprinting in the laboratory (Lund et al. 2003). Such duplicated accessions may need to be bulked to prevent loss of alleles in case the duplication is only partial or if absolute duplicates are to be eliminated (Sackville-Hamilton et al. 2002).Networking will help genebanks to share responsibilities, resources and costs (Frison et al. 2003). For example, a national or regional genebank with limited fi nancial resources can focus on the genetic diversity occurring in its own geographic domain, and/or it may agree to duplicate collections for reasons of safety in another, better endowed, national or international genebank.Repatriation of originally native germplasm that is available only from 'foreign' ex situ germplasm collections can be an important activity for those genebanks with a national or regional mandate and determined to provide better services in germplasm of their own regions. This activity may be followed by germplasm restoration whereby such material is reintroduced to sites from where it was originally collected and has since been lost for in situ conservation or onfarm management.Many genebanks have large germplasm collections, which are often ineffi ciently managed and are therefore seldom accessed by plant breeders. A systematic assessment of the genetic diversity in such collections can help establish core collections. These subsets of large collections contain a limited number of chosen accessions that capture most of the genetic variability in the entire collection while representing, for example, about 10% of the total collection (van Hintum et al. 2000). Developing a core collection therefore improves the management and use of a germplasm collection.A core collection is assembled by taking into account the hierarchical structure of the genepool. The entire collection can be stratifi ed into groups sharing common characteristics according to taxonomy, geographic or ecological origin, and neutral or non-neutral descriptors. Samples are then taken from these groups. Using this process, core subsets can be identifi ed. Genetic studies in selected crops have shown that widespread and localized alleles occurring in the entire collection are usually contained in the core subset, with only rare localized alleles excluded. The core subset often provides an entry point to further study of biodiversity of the entire collection or to the use of these resources (Hodgkin et al. 1995;Johnson and Hodgkin 1999;van Hintum et al. 2000).Genebanks can signifi cantly contribute to the use of conserved wild and cultivated genetic resources through adequate management practices. Increased application of molecular tools will further facilitate the use of such germplasm in crop breeding efforts and add new value to the existing collections. In particular, the identifi cation of specifi c traits in wild relatives of crop species and their transfer into genotypes with a desirable genetic background is a fi eld in which genebanks can play an important role. Furthermore, the new technologies will allow genebanks to contribute to more cost-effi cient conservation efforts and to more rational conservation approaches. The increased opportunities to transfer genes across unrelated species might well have an infl uence on the type of germplasm collections that genebanks want to establish in the future, e.g. trait-specifi c collections might be added to the traditional crop, species or genepool focused collections. About 100 years ago, the rediscovery of Mendel's principles of heredity turned genetics from a mystery into a serious science. By 1980, the deployment of DNA marker technologies had ushered in a new era in the fi eld of genome analysis, which has culminated in the determination of the complete sequence of complex organisms, including higher plants. The rapidly expanding knowledge of the structure and function of genomes will increase our understanding of the role of individual genes and their orchestrated interplay in a cell, tissue or organism. Molecular genetics will also open up new avenues for studying genetic diversity to understand the dynamics of evolution and for using the genetic diversity currently locked in genebanks to improve cultivars.The ex situ conservation of about 6 million accessions of PGR represents an essential contribution to the conservation of both intraand interspecifi c diversity of crops and their wild relatives. The establishment and management of ex situ collections are complex, relying largely on empirical procedures. Hence, only circumstantial evidence has been gathered on the comprehensiveness of individual collections, as well as on the redundancy within and between collections. Similarly, the genetic integrity of individual accessions and changes in their genetic make-up have escaped closer examination. Moreover, systematic approaches for using genetic resources require extensive phenotypic evaluations, which are time consuming and expensive.Many of the above-mentioned issues can be addressed in more detail by using information derived from DNA markers. Based on the current state of DNA marker technology, the present paper aims to highlight its potential impact, as well as its limitations, on managing and using genetic resources. Hammer (2001) estimates that 7000 cultivated plant species exist, including their wild relatives. To provide ex situ conservation for all of them clearly exceeds the current capacities of genebanks. Hence, the dilemma of almost any genebank lies in fi nding a compromise between the number of species to be conserved (biodiversity) and the number of accessions of a given species to be kept (genetic diversity). As a result, most conservation efforts have focused on agriculturally important species. About one third of all ex situ accessions represent just 5 specieswheat, barley, rice, maize and Phaseolus beans-and the remaining two thirds cover only 30 species.The relative overrepresentation of these agriculturally important species does not necessarily mean that their genetic diversity has been fully covered. Certain geographical regions are still not well represented in collections. By complementing geographic and ecological information, molecular marker data may help determine the extent to which accessions from diverse regions represent distinct samples (e.g. Ordon et al. 1997).This approach, however, requires that marker data are available for reference from all existing accessions. For the 'top 30' crops, a substantial fi nancial investment will be needed to generate the corresponding data sets. For example, fi ngerprinting the estimated 370 000 barley accessions (Hordeum ssp.) with 28 genetic markers (i.e. 2 markers per chromosome arm) would require €5 million (at an estimated cost of €0.50 per data point). This is a prohibitively large amount of money. However, with decreasing costs per data point and the potential spin-off effects (some of which are described below), the investment for systematically fi ngerprinting complete collections may be justifi ed over the medium term.Similarly, DNA marker data may provide invaluable information for taxonomic issues. The taxonomic determination of PGR is essential, for both their conservation and their use. Currently, it is mainly based on morphological descriptors and requires extensive expertise, particularly for intraspecifi c resolution. Figure IV.1 illustrates how amplifi ed fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) marker data provided important clues on the taxonomic status of several hitherto undetermined entries of the diffi cult Solanum nigrum complex (nightshade) (Dehmer and Hammer 2004).Basically, a DNA marker-based taxonomy can be developed for any given genus to at least the species level. In many cases, congruency was shown between the DNA-based and classic systems, whereas, in other cases, the taxonomy has had to be revised according to DNA marker and sequence data. In such a context, DNA sequence and marker data are of particular value for understanding the phylogeny of polyploid species, as recently shown for the genus Hordeum (F. Blattner In addition to taxonomic studies, the effect of plant breeding on the formation of genepools can be evaluated and quantifi ed, as has been done for barley, resulting in European barley cultivars forming distinct groups of spring and winter types. The latter are further subdivided into two-rowed and six-rowed barleys (Thiel et al. 2003), a population structure that resulted from crossbreeding activities. In genetic diversity studies, major emphasis is given to the quality and quantity of DNA marker data, because insuffi cient marker numbers result in uneven genome coverage, which may yield unsatisfactory results. Finding congruencies between molecular marker data and classical taxonomy will also become diffi cult if several incompatible schools are in use, as is frequently the case.The management of genetic resources includes all activities ranging from seed storage (or conservation in a vegetative state), through multiplication of seed to provision of genebank accessions on request. The genebank at IPK dispatches an annual average of 17 000 seed, plant and tuber samples, leading to a need for subsequent multiplication. Hence, about 5% of the seed collection is multiplied every year, translating into 7200 accessions that must be planted and monitored in the fi eld or greenhouse. Meticulous precautions are undertaken to prevent contamination of accessions during multiplication, whether by use of particular agricultural practices, permanent control during the vegetative period, or establishment of herbarium collections. This last may serve by offering reference samples to check the authenticity of individual accessions.Measures to check the authenticity of an accession are based on morphological characters, such as the descriptor traits that have been defi ned for many agriculturally important genera. Obviously, the descriptors to be recorded must be limited to a manageable number for each species. Also, the inheritance of many descriptor traits follows a monogenic inheritance (e.g. two rows vs six rows, long awns vs short awns or fl ower pigmentation), critically limiting genome coverage. Molecular markers, as tools for probing additional loci in a genome, can thus check for possible changes during multiplication that may otherwise, because of a lack of a visible phenotype, have gone undetected by morphological inspection in the greenhouse or fi eld.In a pilot study to check the quality of collection management of an inbreeding species, several accessions of the wheat (Triticum aestivum) collection at the IPK were fi ngerprinted with a set of simple sequence repeat (SSR, microsatellite) markers (Börner et al. 2000). No changes were detected in the accessions examined, which had been multiplied from 2 to 24 times over 50 years. The results underscored the effi ciency of the precautions taken by the IPK genebank to preserve the genetic integrity of inbreeding collections.However, SSR fi ngerprinting of a set of barley cultivars revealed unexpected differences between different accessions of identical cultivars (Figure IV.2). Because of the inbreeding nature of barley, identical genotypes are to be expected under the same cultivar name. Most of the 'duplicated' samples had been obtained from different donors, and seed lots may have been confused or wrongly named before the genebank received the samples. Although DNA markers help unveil such cases, identification within a set of homonymous accessions of the most original sample may remain difficult, although Lund et al. (2003) recently proposed a statistical approach.The propagation of inbreeding crops is straightforward, but outbreeding species, both wind-and insect-pollinated, must be propagated as populations. An outbreeding population can be described in terms of its allelic frequencies, and the major objective of any conservation effort is to keep the genetic make-up of a population unaltered. To this end, insect-pollinated plants are grown in isolation chambers and wind-pollinated species in pollen-proof growth chambers or fi eld plots that are suffi ciently isolated from other accessions of the same species. Populations must be suffi ciently large to prevent genetic drift. Environmental effects need to be eliminated to prevent selection.Marker analysis of rye accessions, regenerated 2 to 13 times under standard conditions, revealed extensive shifts in allelic frequency (Chebotar et al. 2003, Figure IV.3). With some markers, a decrease, even loss, of alleles was observed, whereas with other markers, even new alleles were recorded, indicating pollen introgression from other populations. Principally, the extent of observed changes seemed to be a function of the number of multiplication cycles. Thus, molecular marker data provided clear hints for the need to revisit the conservation management of outbreeding species.In some cases, the multiplication of a species is impaired by its lack of adaptation to the environmental conditions prevailing at the location of its genebank: for example, soils, occurrence of specific pathogens or pests, suboptimal temperatures, or inappropriate photoperiod. These problems can be alleviated by subcontracting seed increase to a collaborator or commercial partner with access to a more appropriate site. To monitor the subcontracting, DNA fi ngerprints of the samples fi rst dispatched and those received after the increase is completed will provide the necessary documentation for authenticating the samples. DNA fi ngerprints may also constitute a tool for monitoring multiplication within a genebank, which becomes a crucial issue once ISO certifi cation or similar standards are to be achieved.Despite the accuracy of DNA marker technology, two major questions must be solved:• What percentage of bands should be identical before two accessions are identifi ed as duplicates?• What changes in allele frequency are acceptable in outbreeding populations? To fi nd answers to these questions, pilot studies need to be performed to generate a database that will adequately allow the establishment of meaningful threshold values.Numerous molecular marker technologies are used for DNA fi ngerprinting in plants.To discuss the merits and demerits of any individual marker system is beyond the scope of this paper, but microsatellite and AFLP markers have been preferred in many diversity studies. Attempts have been made to fi ngerprint comprehensive collections of as many as 1000 accessions: for example, Huang et al. (2002) for wheat. However, because few attempts have been made to establish a reference marker set for use in parallel studies, the results of most marker studies for a given species cannot be readily compared and integrated.Despite worldwide activity in DNA fi ngerprinting of ex situ germplasm, the integration of data in corresponding genebank documentation systems is so far insignifi cant. Nevertheless, efforts are being made to develop databases and software tools to visualize and analyse DNA fi ngerprinting data. In this context, fi ngerprinting data based on DNA fragments (e.g. AFLPs or SSRs) can be documented either as gel pictures or as tables containing the length of individual DNA fragments. For the latter, mandatory and extensive internal controls would be needed to obtain accurate estimates of fragment sizes for cross-referencing between experiments and laboratories.The increasing availability of sequence information for various plant species enables direct analysis of the point mutations that give rise to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Point mutations are the most frequent type of intraspecifi c DNA variation (polymorphism), and can be detected in more or less unlimited quantity. Together with insertions and/or deletions, other marker systems also detect point mutations but, because of technical limitations, only a tiny subset of the SNPs present between two genotypes can be detected with these systems. To study the principal equivalency of SNPs identifi ed in several barley genes with gene-derived SSR or RFLP markers, a set of six barley lines was analysed in parallel with all three types of markers (Figure IV.4). The results revealed their principal equivalence, because the correlation of the corresponding similarity matrices ranged from 0.87 to 0.93, being signifi cant in all cases. Because SNPs can be described in an alphanumeric manner according to the four nucleotides, their documentation is simple and straightforward.Given that the same SNP loci are being studied in different laboratories, the corresponding results form compatible data sets that can be combined and analysed in a decentralized process. The analysis of SNPs currently requires expensive detection platforms that are not available to all laboratories and may result in considerable costs per data point (Kota et al. 2001;Jenkins and Gibson 2002). However, the development of bioinformatic tools to facilitate exploitation of available DNA sequence databases is bringing down the costs of identifying SNPs. The technology will become more widespread. In addition, many of the SNPs that were mapped in the barley genome affect the recognition site of restriction enzymes and thus can be assayed as simple CAPS (cleaved amplifi ed polymorphic sequence) markers, requiring a minimum of technical equipment.With the present state of knowledge, SNP markers seem best for meeting the requirements for marker-assisted management of genetic resources. In the short term, these markers will be developed in amounts suffi cient only for major crop species. Thus, the marker-assisted management of species that are less important in developed countries needs to be studied, using conventional marker systems. In these cases, however, intra-genebank management issues may be more important than inter-genebank issues: for example, intra-laboratory performance of a given marker system may be more important than inter-laboratory standardization and compatibility.Systematic fi ngerprinting of germplasm collections will provide additional knowledge in terms of molecular diversity and genetic relationships, both within and between genepools and at both genome and gene levels. Although DNA fingerprinting is usually performed at the genome level, gene-based strategies may help analyse collections for the presence of specifi c alleles. For example, barley collections may be searched for the presence of distinct alleles of the enzyme ßamylase, which differ in terms of thermostability (Malysheva et al. 2004).In the future, collections may be screened for the presence of new alleles at a given locus. These alleles could later be assayed for their functional value. This approach would require the prediction of a gene's phenotype from its DNA sequence, a capacity that is still to be reached. However, recent advances in the analysis of linkage disequilibrium may help identify genes underlying traits of interest by association mapping (Rafalski 2002). This approach obviates the requirement for experimental populations, and genetic studies could be performed directly on the plant material available at a genebank. The time span from identifying a target gene to its deployment in a breeding programme might be reduced, thus further increasing the value of germplasm collections.As a result, implementing analytical tools based on molecular markers may cause a shift in paradigm on the use of genetic resources: in the past genetic resources were used in terms of knowledge of the phenotype but, in the future, genebank collections will be increasingly searched for specifi c genotypes or even structural features of a specifi c gene. Genebanks may extend their services from mainly providing seed samples to providing DNA samples. Currently, however, implementation of marker-assisted germplasm management and use is on a minor scale. For successful large-scale implementation, major interaction between the areas of bioinformatics and genebank documentation is needed to generate the required infrastructure to handle and deconvolute the large amount of data.Despite the exciting potential of molecular marker technologies, several issues on technological impact assessment need to be considered:• What are the social issues if marker technologies become available mainly for agriculturally important species? • Does the additional funding required for deploying marker technology increase the gap between rich and poor genebanks? • Who will take over the costs for improved management: donors or clients?Notwithstanding these questions, DNA markers are about to make their way into genebank laboratories. The outcome, however, will depend mainly on the ability of individual laboratories to generate compatible data sets. This is both a chance and a challenge, which requires international coordination on the issues of a standardized marker system, standardized laboratory protocols and quality checks, and standardized data management. The adoption of appropriate guidelines will ensure that the added value of marker-assisted management of genetic resources will materialize, to the benefi t of all.Most current germplasm holdings began in the 1960s as a result of breeders' demands and the development of genetic resources networks in western Europe, the USA, Australia, New Zealand and the USSR. During the 1970s, regional approaches, based on Vavilov's concept of centres of diversity, were adopted. An increasing concern in the international community about the need to conserve, for future generations, genetic resources that were in danger of disappearing also helped to establish several germplasm banks. A huge number of collecting missions were planned and constitutions of genebanks were established (Frankel 1974;Brown 1989).In the early 1990s, there were technical and political revolutions. The discovery of the PCR was the starting point for rapid development of new molecular techniques in the genomics area. Political change began with the signing of the Convention for Biological Diversity (CBD) and the introduction of the 'Sovereign Rights' concept. Since 2000, the distance between the needs of end users and basic science programmes has progressively increased.Currently, plant molecular tools are usually regarded as being able to improve the effi ciency of breeding programmes but, more critically, form a link between different scientifi c and technical approaches. On one hand, many curators have little awareness of the possibilities offered by molecular genetics and genomics, and, on the other hand, these scientists are not aware that end users exist and need accessible data from them. This information exchange, between basic scientists and end users, is far from being a direct one-step process. Consequently, the collection curator, who is still in a central position, fi nds it diffi cult to link the two worlds.The world of plant genetic resources (PGR) is criss-crossed with more or less efficient networks, developed during recent decades (Pistorius 1997). The genomic world has recently and rapidly set up genomic initiatives, although only in a few crops, and frequently focused on one particular aspect (Plant Physiology 2003).With respect to plant germplasm management and use, there is no connection between basic scientists and end users such as farmers (Figure V.1). The curator, managing base and core collections, seems to be strategically placed, being located at the top of a hypothetical triangle with putative relationships with the other two extremes. In practice, however, the curator relates, more or less directly, with breeders and molecular geneticists but is distant from both farmers and basic scientists. Likewise, geneticists establish contacts in both genomics and genetic resources, but rarely relate with basic, or fundamental, scientists. Breeders, in their turn, tend to relate only with geneticists, curators and end users.In reality, the information flow between molecular geneticists and traditional breeders is highly inefficient. This is not so much because of how the system is organized but because of the highly specialized nature of the different parts, and their different centres of interests and languages. The curator cannot acquire knowledge and V. Connecting plant germplasm collections and genomic centres: how to better link curators, molecular biologists and geneticists? Serge Hamon † , Emile Frison ‡ and Luis Navarro § † UMR 1097, IRD-Centre de Montpellier, France, ‡ INIBAP, Parc Scientifi que Agropolis, Montpellier, France and § IVIA, Department of Plant Protection and Biotechnology, Mondaca, Valencia, Spain understanding of either fast-moving area without appropriate help.The traditional perception of the curator working only with plants and phenotypic evaluation is changing, or it should be. Firstly, more than one scientist may work in a germplasm bank, permitting the required specialization on new areas. Secondly, many germplasm banks are located in research institutions where scientists specializing in the new areas may be working and could collaborate with curators. Curators thus have, as a signifi cant part of their job, the task of establishing close links with scientists of other disciplines to improve the maintenance and use of germplasm resources. Obviously, such activities are much easier for germplasm banks located in developed countries and, to a certain extent, in international agricultural research centres (IARCs). The objectives of germplasm banks should also change to integrate new technologies into their management.Consequently, the current challenge facing the use of genetic resources remains focused on improving the management of genetic resources and their effi cient use. But the curator must understand and integrate new data and technologies coming from molecular geneticists and biologists.In this paper, we fi rst summarize how PGR networks, genomic programmes and biological databases are organized. We then suggest improvements in organization, using the current examples of Vitis and Musa as illustrations.Plant genetic resources networks PGR networks vary in complexity from simple bilateral agreements to complex international networks that include different levels such as national networks, subregional programmes and regional networks (Frison et al. 2002). At the national level, PGR activities involve a wide range of people: policy-makers, scientists, universities, agronomy schools, breeders, rural communities and, in developing countries, NGOs.In some countries PGR activities are supervised by a specifi c institution such as the Institute of Biodiversity Conservation and Research (IBCR) in Ethiopia. In other countries, the system is catalysed by a small group of scientists such as those located in the French Bureau des Ressources Génétiques (see the BRG Web site).* The BRG organizes discussions at the national level on the genetic resources of animals, plants and microorganisms. Recently, a project, developed with the participation of stakeholders, was written into the National Charter for the Management of Genetic Resources (BRG 1999). The BRG also organizes seminars and thematic conferences to promote scientifi c, socioeconomic and legal research in the fi eld of genetic resources, and to facilitate the transfer of knowledge. Other countries, such as Spain, have national programmes to conserve PGR, involving all the country's research institutions.At the subregional or regional levels, countries often share ecogeographic similarities and may have many crops in common. The clear benefi ts of collaboration between these countries include sharing conservation facilities and common objectives. For example, the Nordic Genebank (NGB Web site) has the mandate to conserve and document the genetic variation in Nordic plant material useful to agriculture. The NGB also aims to rationalize cooperation between Nordic countries wanting to use PGR for breeding and research. Stored material is made available for breeding, research and, in other countries, fi eld use. At present, only some of the NGB's databases are directly searchable over the Internet, but effort is being made to provide all available information through an interactive interface.* For details on this and other databases, see the respective entries in Web Site Addresses of Databases on page 43.The NGB material is divided among three databases (NGB Web site):• Taxon Database, which describes taxa within the NGB's mandate and species that are threatened or protected in Nordic countries • Culton Database, which is an inventory database of commercial and primitive cultivars of taxa within the mandate • Accession Database, which contains information about accessions in the NGB seed store.Member states of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) established a similar system, known as the Plant Genetic Resources Centre (SPGRC Web site), as a non-profi t intergovernmental institution. Its headquarters are near Lusaka, Zambia.Another approach used in sub-Saharan Africa seeks to assist the region's countries to build up their capacities for research, conservation and use of both crop and forest germplasm through viable national programmes, subregional networks and selected crop networks such as those for coffee, coconut, Musa and yam. The project (details at the Wisard Web site) provides support for training and documentation of PGR activities at national and regional levels, and helps raise public policy awareness on the region's PGR issues. The strategy, implemented during the 1980s in West and central Africa, needs consolidating, considering that most countries lack the capacity to develop independent, fully functional systems.At the moment, the most successful example of regional collaboration is the European Cooperative Programme for Crop Genetic Resources Networks (ECP/GR Web site) in which 35 countries and 10 networks participate. Some networks are plant specifi c such as the Cereals Network, Forages Network and Fruit Network, whereas others are mostly thematic such as the Documentation and Information Network, In situ and On-farm Conservation Network, and Inter-regional Cooperation Network.The ECP/GR networks are concerned with long-term in situ and ex situ conservation of PGR, and increasing the use of PGR in Europe. Data for fi ve types of descriptors are collected: passport, management, environment and site, characterization and evaluation. Recommendations are made to produce information that closely follows the descriptor lists in terms of ordering and numbering descriptors, and using specifi ed descriptors and recommended descriptor states. These descriptors lists, however, were established without reference to molecular data. None of the programme's eight missions focuses on integrating and using molecular and/or genomic data. Consequently, the networks, even though they are very well organized and effi cient, do not directly relate to genomic data.International crop networks are certainly the best way to bring together specialists from different fi elds. The European Barley Database (EBDB Web site) contains 92 000 accessions from 36 institutions in 29 countries. One of the fi rst world core collections, the International Barley Core Collection (BCC), was constituted from data available in the 1990s (van Hintum 1995).The importance of PGR centres, networks and databases as essential elements in the collaboration and effective use of genetic resources is evident. However, they pay little attention to the new areas of molecular markers and genomics. One reason for this is that these networks were mostly set up during the 'golden' period of genetic resources-the 1960 to the 1980s-before the molecular sciences took off.Another reason is that, during the 1990s, in terms of the broad objective of improving tools for analysing genetic diversity, the technical race was fast and seemingly endless. For example, PCR-derived techniques evolved extremely quickly, from RFLPs in the early 1990s to single sequence repeats (SSRs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the late 1990s. During that period, other markers such as random amplifi ed polymorphic DNA fragments (RAPDs) and amplifi ed fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) came and went, inducing a degree of complexity for users and uneasiness among curators and the scientists involved in genetic resources studies.During the 1980s and 1990s, lists of morphological and agronomic descriptors were published without reference to common sets of molecular markers. Base collections or subsets of collections were evaluated with highly pertinent descriptors, and databases were built up. In contrast, the samples studied with different types of markers for purposes such as phylogeny, population structure and plant reproductive behaviour were tiny and inadequately standardized, and the data poorly stored. In addition, some types of markers (i.e. RAPDs and AFLPs) were not easily transferred from one laboratory to another or were used only on small sets of genotypes.The potential usefulness of genomics arose through the idea that genetic diversity could be used beyond specifi c boundaries. In practice, genomic programmes could be divided into at least six categories (Figure V.2): (a) developing effi cient markers and high-density maps, (b) assessing the relationships between genetic and chromosome maps, (c) elaborating physical maps, (d) studying gene expression, (e) conducting functional analyses of genes and (f) bioinformatics. Until recently, only category (a) was taken into account. Now, genetic diversity can and must be observed, not only at the DNA level, but also at the expressed level. Categories (a), (d) and (e) are therefore of major interest to curators, who could broaden their knowledge through networking.Many molecular markers have been produced to analyse genetic diversity. Their characteristics and availability have dramatically evolved during the last decade.Currently, codominant markers are preferred, with microsatellites being of particular interest (Goldstein and Schlötterer 1999). Such markers are easy to use, can be extrapolated to closely related species or genera, and, through sequencers, can be readily used automatically.Another family of markers of increasing interest is expressed sequence tags (ESTs). EST programmes permit identifying families of genes expressed under different conditions, such as drought resistance, cold resistance or pathogen resistance, and help explain the differential behaviour of different genotypes at a higher integrative level. Developing these markers is more expensive than for the others mentioned, necessitating sharing and exchange through networks and consortiums to reduce redundancy and optimize budget use.High-density maps are constructed on the basis of recombination frequencies of chromosomal markers, either genes or DNA markers (e.g. RFLPs and SSRs). In applied genetics, the breeder may benefi t by knowing links with neutral or adaptive characters. Knowing recombination frequencies may facilitate planning of population sizes for selection. A reference population must be prepared (i.e. crossing between distinct genotypes) and enough progeny must be available (a minimum of 200 individuals). Where possible, such populations must be duplicated and their references kept in a unique place. These populations could be sent to any user, either as plants or as DNA. The developed markers would be SSRs or SNPs.For any one crop, the minimum reference needed is a saturated map where all linkage groups are identifi ed and 200-300 markers are available. Combinations of desirable genes are most helpful for introgressing characters from distant species. Syntenic groups of genes are often observed. For example, comparing genetic maps within Poaceae was greatly facilitated by conserving, in order, markers and genes along chromosomes (Devos and Gale 2000).Curators are increasingly interested in having information on the location of markers in linkage groups. The main problem is being able to compare different maps. Hence, establishing consensus maps is frequently the top priority of networks. When a group finally obtains a consensus map and the different marker types, the next diffi culty is to build up a database that is accessible to every member of the consortium, preferably through the Web, using access names and passwords. Finally, to develop markers, coordination of activities is a must.New programmes tend to search for relationships between physical and recombination maps. Distribution of genes along chromosomes is not uniform, with no direct correlation between recombination and physical maps. In such a context, identifying a genotype of particular importance or having specifi c attributes is essential, that is, researchers and teams must identify and develop particular genotypes (e.g. dwarf architecture or short seeding cycle).Such reference maps must each be elaborated in only one place. The bacterial artifi cial chromosome (BAC) library varies, according to the precision required, from 5 to 20 copies of the genome equivalent. The higher the number of copies, the more precision generated, but also the more expensive and time consuming. If the goal is to prepare genome sequencing or anchor specifi c genes or ESTs, the number of copies required can be changed. Integrated collaboration between teams is essential for success.To summarize, a standard genomic programme has a minimum of six activities:• developing effi cient markers and highdensity maps • assessing the relationships between genetic and chromosome maps • elaborating physical maps • studying gene expression, • conducting functional analyses of genes • bioinformatics.Without data harmonization and intergroup collaboration, using the products is nearly impossible. Major crops now have several thousands of EST sequences coming from different plant organs or developmental stages. If these sequences are to be used, they must be structured into effi cient and available databases. Over the last two decades, databases have become essential resources for biologists worldwide.Molecular biological databases have emerged, but mostly unrelated to the world of PGR, largely because this revolution was initiated through the Human Genome Initiative. This initiative produced new databases such as the human gene prediction database maintained by the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI Web site). This non-profi t academic organization forms part of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL Web site), and is a centre for research and services in bioinformatics. The EBI manages databases of biological data, including nucleic acid and protein sequences and macromolecular structures. Its mission is to ensure that the growing body of information from molecular biology and genome research is placed in the public domain and is freely accessible to all sectors of the scientifi c community, thus promoting scientifi c progress.EBI's goals are to build, maintain and provide biological databases and information services to support data deposition and exploitation. The best known is the EMBL Nucleotide Database, Europe's primary collection of nucleotide sequences. EBI collaborates with GenBank of the National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD (NCBI Web site), and the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ Web site) to contribute to ENSEMBL (ENSEMBL Web site). This database provides up-to-date data on completed genomes and the best possible automatic annotation.Other EBI databases include Swiss-Prot, which provides complete annotated protein sequences; the Macromolecular Structure Database, a European project to manage and distribute data on macromolecular structures; and ArrayExpress for gene expression data.Other initiatives were set up for the sequencing of microorganisms and animal models such as Drosophila melanogaster or Caenorhabditis elegans, leading to, respectively, the FlyBase Consortium and the WormBase Web sites.Despite their different functions, all these databases consist of three tiers of software: a database management system, database access software and Web server, and the Web browser. Even so, this is not suffi cient to have an integrated system. Some databases do not recognize orthological relationships (i.e. homologous genes derived from speciation by vertical descent). Others do, but do not integrate map positions. The diverse databases reflect the expertise and interests of the groups maintaining them.Among the problems reported is the clash of concepts that users come up against as they move from one database to another. This can be important: for example, the allele concept varies in meaning according to scientifi c community; it can mean 'any genomic variant, including parts located outside genes' or 'the variant that changes only genes'. Another severe limitation is the continual change that occurs as new data types are added, and fi elds and nomenclature are altered. Recently, considerable effort was made to create the Gene Ontology Database (see Web site), which currently holds three ontologies-'structured, controlled' vocabularies that aim at precision and consistency in defi nitions of gene functions, processes and terms. Such vocabularies help facilitate integration.To overcome problems of integration, several approaches have been suggested, including that of 'knuckles and nodes' (KN) suggested by Stein (2003). In this system, the source databases, as we have now, form the nodes, each of which uses a distinct and independent data model. These nodes are richly detailed. In contrast, the 'knuckles' are carefully maintained curator services that provide the information needed to relate data from one node to another. They are restricted to a single task and constrained to use standard interfaces. For example, one 'knuckle' may service only orthological relationships. It will also ensure that the symbols used for a given species are translated into those used for another.Although awareness and concern for postgenomic possibilities are increasing, plant genomics remains underdeveloped. Only genomic programmes on model plants have developed applications (Cronk 2001). For example, The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR Web site) is a database for Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae), which structures information into four categories: advanced search; analytical tools; external links; and Arabidopsis information. Each category encompasses several smaller databases (TAIR Web site).For other crops, such as tomato, potato, barley and maize, The Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR Web site) centralizes gene indexes and offers database searches according to nucleotide or protein sequence, identifi er, gene product name and EST annotations. A plant family integrated project is exemplifi ed by the Gramene Initiative (Web site). Its objective is to provide comparative mapping resources for monocotyledons. Database searches include the rice genome browser; rice blast; maps; markers, proteins; phenotypes; ontology; literature, including a capacity to download physical maps; genetic maps; in silico data; microsatellites; phenotype data; and protein databases.How can curators be helped to use the new information? An application of the KN approach for connecting PGR is suggested in The French Vitis collection, located at the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA Web site) in Vassal, southern France, is internationally signifi cant for this genus, and is very well documented. The collection contains about 7500 accessions, corresponding to 210 species originating from 35 countries. The collection includes 4850 Vitis vinifera corresponding to 3000 cépages (or vine types) and 1300 hybrids. Each accession is represented by fi ve plants. Each cépage is carefully described according to a descriptor list, and its genetic history is elucidated, using molecular markers (Bowers et al. 1999). The team is now developing an automatic system for a high-output genotyping system.The genome size of Vitis vinifera-about 480 Mbp-is similar to that of the rice genome. To develop Vitis genomic resources, the international scientific community has decided to create the International Grape Genome Program (IGGP Web site) to optimize technical and In Europe, the IGGP is strongly connected with genetic resources collections, and the research teams, involving 19 participants, are working on this plant through the European Vitis Database (Web site).The high-genetic density map will be developed on a reference hybrid population (Cabernet S × Riesling). So far, 200 descendents are available, and the number is increasing. A reference population was created and is kept in the USA. Duplicates will be sent to genetic resources centres, and DNA samples are available for all teams wanting to participate in increasing the number of molecular markers. For the fi rst round, microsatellites were selected because they are codominants and easily manageable with automatic genotypers. Currently, 200 microsatellites have been located on the map (Riaz et al. 2003). Through the Genoplante Initiative (Web site), INRA has sequenced a new set of 200 microsatellites.Three teams are now involved: the Istituto Agrario San Michele (ISMAA), Italy; the Institute for Grapevine Breeding (IGB), Geilweilerhof, Germany; and INRA-Vigne (Web site). They are also developing other sets from ESTs. The first development towards the physical map was selecting for a 13X Cabernet BAC library using three restriction enzymes. The fi rst markers and/or genes will then be anchored onto BAC clones to connect the genetic and physical maps. The BAC clones will then be fi ngerprinted.For expressed genes, different teams started years ago to sequence ESTs. Currently, about 30 000 Vitis sequences are available in the genebank. Discussions have started on preparing 10 000 gene microarrays, using data from different international groups: the University of California-Davis, University of Nevada-Reno (UNR) (both in the USA), INRA, ISMAA and IGB. Collections of full-length cDNA, the foundation of functional gene analysis, were initiated with two projects, one at UNR and the other at the French Genopole System (Web site).Workers at the Commonwealth Scientifi c and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) of Australia have selected a dwarf genotype of Vitis that is homozygous and has a short biological cycle. This grape will be used by the network. INRA-Colmar has also produced near-isogenic genotypes derived from a black Pinot. At the UNR and INRA-Montpellier, proteomic and metabolomic platforms are being developed. In Australia and France, research programmes are under way to analyse natural mutants found in collections. To regroup all this information, a specifi c Web page, covering recent and available molecular data, has been created by TIGR (TIGR Vitis Web site). To harmonize data, a bioinformatic seminar was organized in 2003 at UNR (UNR Web site).An initiative to apply genomics technologies to the sustainable improvement of banana (Musa spp.) was launched in July 2001. Researchers from the world over came together to form a consortium. Their aim was to develop freely accessible resources for Musa genomics and use new knowledge and tools to help improve the crop through both targeted conventional breeding and transgenic strategies. The end result will be new high-yielding Musa varieties that will respond to local needs and ever-changing environmental challenges.Deciphering the banana genome is an enormous task that requires the full participation and collaboration of many scientists. The Global Musa Genomics Consortium (Web site) functions under the guidance of a management committee within the framework of the Global Programme for Musa Improvement (PROMUSA). The International Network for the Improvement of Banana and Plantain (INIBAP Web site) functions as secretariat, and assumes the responsibility for external communications, including the development of an Internet portal that makes current results and information available to the wider world.The Musa Consortium brings together expertise from 28 publicly-funded institutions from 15 countries. As well as providing close collaboration, all members agree to share materials and resources, including sequence data and enabling technologies. The sequences produced by the Consortium are placed in the public domain and any new varieties are made freely available to smallholders.INIBAP set up an e-mail list server for the Musa Consortium to encourage members to exchange information. A Musa Genomic Resources Centre was created, and resources such as BAC and cDNA libraries are being made readily available to members of the Consortium. The protocol for producing transformed plants is well established and is now applied for promoter tagging. The Consortium is also developing a strong bioinformatics component. The genomic data assembled and analysed will also be made available in a user-friendly fashion through a Web-based integrated Musa information portal, together with other relevant public knowledge on Musa.The Consortium's overall strategy is to adopt a stepwise approach, focusing on comparative genomics and targeting early gene discovery. As a monocotyledon that is taxonomically distantly related to rice, Musa is ideal for studying synteny between distantly related species. Indeed, Musa is now being recognized as a powerful model for studying fundamental aspects of plant genomes. The Global Musa Genomic Consortium is attracting new partners who, through their more upstream research, will provide considerable information and results that will greatly strengthen the Consortium's more appliedoriented research goals.Genomic and molecular markers projects are quickly developing new tools that have the potential to greatly improve the management and use of PGR. However, in practice, applying the new developments for routine use on a large scale in germplasm banks is often very diffi cult for the following reasons: • Availability of permanent scientifi c staff is often restricted to the curator, who usually specializes in phenotype characterization of accessions-still a priority task for germplasm banks.• Diffi culty in using, or even being aware, of new genomic technologies. Molecular markers come and go very quickly, making the selection of marker types for application to all accessions of a given crop very diffi cult. A task lasting several years may fi nish with data considered obsolete by the rest of the scientifi c community.• Molecular markers are expensive to use and often beyond the resources of most germplasm banks.To solve these problems is not easy, and will require a multi-pronged approach. Curators are still in a strategic position to link research activities between geneticists and breeders, thus approaching basic science to end users. However, their traditional role of working only with plants and phenotypic evaluation will have to change to include activities oriented towards establishing close ties of cooperation with scientists of other disciplines. Good examples are the Grape Genomics Consortium and the Citrus Genomic Functional Project in Spain (Genomica Web site) where the germplasm banks have been playing an important role since the project's beginning, thus guaranteeing that results will have direct application to the better management and use of genetic resources.While getting geneticists involved in developing and using molecular markers for small sets of accessions for different research purposes is relatively easy, getting them involved in the routine application of markers to characterize the entire germplasm bank is very diffi cult. Hiring permanent scientifi c staff specialized in these new areas would help solve this problem, but such an action requires a signifi cant increase in the budget, which only rich germplasm banks can afford.An alternative approach would be to establish regional networks, and even worldwide networks, with the specifi c objective to characterize the germplasm of specifi c crops through molecular markers. Such networks would facilitate the use of the most appropriate tools, reduce costs for individual parties and improve strategies for conservation and use. Obviously, intellectual property rights will have to be taken into account in these possible networks. International agricultural research centres such as IPGRI are in the best position to take these types of initiatives.The changing role and increasing potential of genebanks in the 'genomics age' Recent advancements, particularly in the fi elds of molecular and population genetics, biotechnology and genomics, have greatly expanded the potential use, quality and impact of genebanks. Since the inception of genebanks, with their aim to formally acquire germplasm resources, their main goal was to conserve and store these resources for current and future use. Curators of these genebanks did not necessarily require a high level of scientifi c research knowledge, and the user community consisted mainly of farmers and plant breeders wanting various accessions. This situation began to change, however, with the advent of molecular techniques during the 1980s and even more so with the new genomics tools during the late 1990s.Among the many benefits that these techniques brought was the comparative ease with which scientists could incorporate genes from wild relatives into new cultivated varieties. This led to greatly increased demand for accessions that had previously been seen as undesirable or even useless (Tanksley and McCouch 1997). Such increased demand for germplasm resources has been exacerbated by the global food security situation and attempts to alleviate hunger through crop improvement.Concurrently, the user community became more diverse, ranging from plant breeders wanting to screen material to molecular geneticists looking for alleles for introgression and crop improvement, and now, even to genomics scientists wanting to sequence additional alleles of genes of interest. Although not always cost-effective, new DNA technologies have also made possible the examination and comparison of accessions in a genebank at the molecular level, identifying precise genetic differences or redundancies among accessions. DNA sequencing could, one day, make knowing the entire sequence of each individual in a collection possible, thus establishing a true 'genebank'. Thus, the plant germplasm resource community is expecting more and is asking questions on handling the increasing demand for germplasm resources. The community is also querying whether genebank curators should be taking advantage of the new techniques to improve or streamline the collections. Answering these questions, however, is compounded by decreases in funding for many genebanks, the diffi culties curators face in learning or even keeping abreast of the quantity of new technologies, and the complexities of selecting those technologies most likely to answer specifi c biological questions.These new technologies often come with a high initial price tag, primarily associated with acquisition of equipment. In addition, the fast pace of new developments related to these technologies requires frequent retraining of personnel and upgrading of equipment and software. Both factors make the technologies inaccessible to most developing countries, leading to the unfortunate effect of increasing the technological divide-the gap between the technical capabilities of developing and developed nations-at a time when much effort has been invested to decrease it.Louise Fresco, Assistant Director General of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), warns of an increasing 'molecular divide' between between developed and developing nations, meaning that the promise and potential of new technologies are not being shared equally (Fresco 2003;Northoff 2003). Developing countries are not able to take advantage of the full range of biotechnology tools to harness the value of their genetic resources. Fresco fears that biotechnology could actually aggravate current global inequalities unless something is done to bridge this gap (Fresco 2003).While eliminating or at least minimizing the technological or molecular divide is laudable, attempts to do so have been, to date, largely unsuccessful. A major reason for this VI. Capacity-building and training Theresa Fulton and Stephen Kresovich Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA is the lack of comprehensive training. Isolated training of a few individuals who are then sent back to their home laboratories to put their newly learned techniques into practice, alone and unsupported, is ineffective. Data are generated and, unfortunately, not analysed. Even more disappointingly, little of this information is used to improve the quality or use of collections.Another challenge in bridging the technological divide is another apparent 'divide' in the perception of how biotechnology should be used in this task. On one side of the perception divide are many researchers who feel that cutting-edge technology is an absolute must for conducting top scientifi c research. On the other side are those that feel that biotechnology is simply the latest 'toy', unaffordable and inaccessible to all but the wealthy few. In fact, biotechnology is neither-rather, it is one of the many tools available to those working in the fi eld of conserving plant genetic resources. Biotechnology should never be thought of as an end in itself, but as something that can be effi ciently targeted to solve real curatorial or user needs.Comprehensive training is the foundation on which to bridge the technological divide and effectively use biotechnology in germplasm resource management. Although necessary in some instances, buying new equipment and installing new facilities in developing countries is not enough. Also essential are researchers who can think critically and independently about the objectives of their research programmes and the biological questions being addressed. The goal of training programmes is to produce such researchers.Researchers and curators must be able to make the best choice of strategy and technology for each particular biological question. They must be able to interpret the data that they generate and understand how best to use the knowledge gained. Thus, training cannot be limited to instructions on how to use new equipment and follow new protocols.For long-term effectiveness, training must emphasize basic scientifi c concepts in biology, genetics, genetic resources management, experimental design, data analysis, statistics and genomic sciences. This training should begin at, but not be limited to, the graduate student level. However, given the speed at which technology and biological sciences are moving and the pace that data are being generated, training cannot stop on the receipt of an advanced degree. New scientists must receive continuing education and ongoing support, especially those in developing countries who may not have access to adequate local support networks.Continuing education can be made available through many mechanisms. An example is the training materials available online from IPGRI's Web site and through such publications as Karp et al. (1997). IPGRI and the Institute for Genomic Diversity (Cornell University) have collaborated to produce a new training module on molecular markers, soon to be available online, which will be continually updated to include new technologies and information on, for example, differences in cost between the many molecular marker techniques (de Vicente and Fulton 2003).The Internet is a good medium for people who cannot afford to travel and thus cannot access institutions that host molecular science training workshops and other learning experiences. However, many studies have shown that most deep learning, that is, learning that includes true understanding and not mere memorization of facts and protocols, occurs only in hands-on sessions (Deboer 1991;Lederman 1992;AAAS 1993). Thus, where practical, training must be conducted through hands-on laboratory workshops rather than through books, lectures, or the Internet.Ongoing support must also be available to help scientists implement the concepts and techniques that they have learned. Feedback, including from responses to survey questions, indicates that a key barrier to effective impact of many training programmes comprises the problems encountered when trying to put newly learned concepts and protocols into real practice at the home laboratory. One way of overcoming this barrier is to encourage the development of 'cohorts', people with common backgrounds, training and interests who can be called upon when questions and problems arise.A Rockefeller-funded programme at Cornell University is establishing the African Food Security and Natural Resources Management Doctoral Training Program (see their Web site). The goals of this project include training interdisciplinary teams to conduct research, providing education on topics relating to agricultural productivity in Africa (especially soil degradation problems) and examining how to encourage African scientists to continue these activities once they return home (AfricaGrant 2001). So far, the programme has gone very well: six of the eight students have already passed their preliminary exams (at the time of writing, the other two were scheduled for examinations) and one student won a Heinz award. These students will soon be returning home to Kenya to do their fi eld work, where they will receive some follow-up supervision and encouragement to network among themselves (Alice Pell, pers. comm.).For germplasm curators, a community of other curators with whom to discuss current issues and coordinate efforts is especially important. This should be done not only by offering workshops and training, but also by encouraging frequent contact through conferences, reciprocal visits and online resources such as list-servers and bulletin boards.CGIAR networking has played and will continue to play an important role in promoting comprehensive training towards bridging the technological divide in several ways. First, the CGIAR should promote regional collaboration not only across borders, but also and particularly among institutions within developing countries. Germplasm resource centres in resource-poor nations should be encouraged to help and support each other, to make the best use of their fi nite resources, both material and human. Systems should be set up to facilitate sharing of expensive equipment and expertise.Second, a special strength of CGIAR networking is and should be that it allows the development of excellence in a particular niche. No centre can be expert on all topics and do everything well. Instead, each centre should be recognized as having a particular area of expertise. Centres should be ready and willing to share their complementary expertise and collaborate on projects to form a united front in the challenge of keeping up with cutting-edge science.Most importantly, the CGIAR centres should coordinate information sharing. In this age of an ever-increasing pace in new developments in research, many CGIAR constituents and national programmes remain aware of advances only with diffi culty or not at all. Yet to make appropriate choices on new technologies, researchers must keep informed. Of particular importance to those at genetic resources repositories are current issues related to access, benefi t sharing and intellectual property rights, which continually change. The CGIAR centres must take responsibility for holding appropriate workshops to discuss and update constituents about these issues.Researchers in developing countries, especially those working on 'orphan crops', must be aware of current research in related crops so they can take advantage of this information from a comparative genomics perspective. Genebank scientists should stay informed on current use so they can be fl exible and adapt to their changing role as the user community sees it. The CGIAR centres should also form a coordinated network where equipment and expertise is available for shared use.For many research laboratories, new technologies such as DNA sequencers are expensive and technically diffi cult to maintain, and usually not used at a high enough rate to make their purchase worthwhile. A much more effi cient approach would be to buy and maintain this type of equipment at a few centralized locations, thus leaving the laboratories with more fi nancial resources for other purposes, more fl exibility and increased currency in an ever-progressing fi eld.Outreach and public awareness should also continue to be important functions of CGIAR networking. The general public must realize the importance of conserving and understanding the earth's genetic resources. Not only will this ensure that funding the centres remains a priority but it will also encourage young people to consider the fi eld as a viable career option.Attracting young students to careers in plant genetic resources conservation and plant breeding is increasingly diffi cult, probably because these fi elds are seen as unglamorous or obsolete compared with biotechnology, or as too diffi cult because of the broad knowledge base needed to be successful in these fi elds. The future of plant genetic resources conservation depends on young students continuing to see this fi eld as signifi cant, as well as providing rewarding career options. Thus, it is in the best interests of the CGIAR to promote the importance of plant genetic resources conservation and foster a supportive and encouraging environment for both new researchers in the fi eld and those already in the system.","tokenCount":"17809"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_2/2196585800.json b/data/part_2/2196585800.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..42b4198387e58df2cf409ed0a7e6f68c44e4dd5e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_2/2196585800.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f0e34d80e4be093b1149e39e2b6a7938","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/e09b2a15-62b7-488d-b14c-da22ac444960/content","id":"1571583271"},"keywords":["Apomixis","Genetic engineering","Asexual reproduction","Sexual reproduction","Biotechnology","Chromosome translocation","Molecular genetics","Genetic variation","Genetic control","Genomes","Tripsacum","Zea mays","progeny forms","Plant breeding","Breeding methods CIMMYT, IRD, European Commission AGRIS Category Codes: F30 Plant Genetics and Breeding Dewey Decimal Classification: 631.523 ES -embryo sac","1-inner integument","IA -initial cell of oposporous embryo sac","IE -integumentary embryo","M-micropyle","MC -meristematic cell","MIT -meristematic inner integument tissue","EN -endosperm","PN -polar nuclei","5-synergid","T-tetrade of megaspores","Z. zygote","ZE . zygotic embryo","SE -synergid embryo","FA -filiform apparatus","CW -cell wall","C-cuticle","M-mitochondrio","N-nucleus","P. plastid","PD -plasmodesmata","V-vacuole"],"sieverID":"6109a91b-1514-46f7-8e3e-8b1307148840","pagecount":"258","content":"Institut de Recherche pour Ie Developpement (IRD) is a French public research institution under the auspices of the ministers in charge of research and cooperation. For the last 50 years, it has conducted important research in tropical and subtropical areas. With an annual budget of US$160 million, IRD employs approximately 750 scientists (of a total of 2,300 employees), with more than 250 of them on long-term aSSignments in 26 different countries.The European Union (EU) is the result of a process of cooperation and integration that began in 1951 between six countries and today has 15 Member States and is preparing for its fifth enlargement. The EU's mission is to organize relations both among the Member States and their 374 million citizens in a coherent manner and on the basis of solidarity. The main objective of the European Union's Research, Technology, and Development (RTD) program FAIR (Agriculture and Fisheries) is the promotion and harmonization of research in the major European food and non-food production sectors of agriculture, horticulture, forestry, fisheries, and aquaculture. The program seeks to promote links between research and the input and processing industries, with rural economic activities, end-users, and consumers.The International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYf)@ (www.cimmyt.org) is an internationally funded, nonprofit, scientific research and training organization. Headquartered in Mexico, CIMMYT works with agricultural research institutions worldwide to improve the productivity, profitability, and sustainability of maize and wheat systems for poor farmers in developing countries. It is one of 16 food and environmental organizations known as the Future Harvest Centers.As implied by the title of the book-\"The Flowering of Apomixis: From Mechanisms to Genetic Engineering\"-this complex and mysterious aspect of reproduction is beginning to yield its secrets to more than a century of scientific inquiry by researchers from around the world. Building on this foundation of knowledge, and by using the rapidly advancing tools and techniques of biotechnology, we are probing the intricate processes of apomixis more deeply and broadly than ever before. Consequently, our grasp of the mechanisms of both asexual and sexual reproduction has expanded tremendously in the last decade. And though timetables for research discoveries cannot be dictated, the promise of applying apomixis technology to real world needs and issues has never been brighter.One of the most urgent applications for the technology will be feeding and raising the standard of living for the burgeoning populations of the developing world. It is fitting that in the book's opening chapter, Gary Toenniessen, Director of Food Security for the Rockefeller Foundation, succinctly sets forth the magnitude and gravity of the situation we face, and the tremendous potential apomixis holds for helping to meet those challenges. By producing crops that produce asexually through seeds, we can greatly hasten the development of new higher-yielding hybrid varieties, a keystone of past productivity gains and one that will be required to boost productivity in coming years. With costs of development coming down, seed prices to farmers may also decrease. Of particular import to small-holder farmers, apomixis will allow scientists to efficiently breed varieties specifically tailored to a multitude of niche environments, many of them situated in the most marginal agricultural areas. Finally, because apomictic seed is selfreplicating, developing world farmers should be able to recycle seed without losing valuable hybrid characterrstics. Furthermore, the technology could be used in such a way that farmers may be able to better fix the traits they deem desirable within their own indigenous varieties and landraces. Needless to say, however, there is work yet to be done.In the following chapters, the authors follow two complementary paths in the ultimate quest to produce apomictic food crop plants. One path is to either transfer the apomictic trait from a wild apomictic relative into a crop plant or change sexual genes into apomictic genes in the crop plant itself. This research is currently being conducted in important A surplus of food in many of the world's wealthier countries has led to a certain complacency there about future supplies and availability. But for the vast majority of the world's people, who live in poorer developing countries faced with growing populations and increasing demand for food, concern rather than complacency is the order of the day. For the nations of the South, the task of feeding their future generations presents a critical and formidable challenge for agriculture over the next half century or longer.Fortunately, there are reasons to be optimistic that an end to population growth is finally in sight, albeit at some distance (Lutz et al. 1997). The rate of world population growth peaked around 1970 and has been steadily declining since then. As societies have moved from dependence on subsistence agriculture to more intensive agriculture and more modem economies-in the process providing improved nutrition and health care and expanded educational opportunities to their girls and boys-desired family size has dropped. A family planning revolution in the developing world, under way now for more than two decades, has lowered the average number of children in a family from six to three, which is reflected in a respective decline in annual population growth from 2.5 to around 1.8 percent (United Nations 1997). Contraceptive use by women of child-bearing age in developing countries has risen from about 10 percent to more than 50 percent during the last three decades; and it is estimated that there are at least an additional 100 million women who wish to regulate their fertility, but who are not now using contraceptives. If effective family planning and reproductive health services were provided to all those wishing to use them, demographers now predict that replacement level fertility could be reached as early as 2020 and that the world's population would stabilize at 8-11 billion people near the middle of the 21st century (Bongaarts 1994;Lutz et al. 1997).Although the task of curbing population growth will be arduous, generally speaking the agencies and institutions that provide family planning services have the technical know-how required to achieve this goal; now they are working on mol5ilizing the necessary financial resources and political commitments. To complement this effort, the agricultural sector must provide the basic nutrition and economic growth needed to fuel the desire for smaller families and the requisite family planning services, until the time that replacement level fertility is reached.These encouraging population trends will, over the long term, be good for agriculture, as they imply that sometime during the next century the ever-increasing demand for greater food production should finally stabilize. The downside is that even given these positive trends, the developing world will need to produce two to three times as 2 Gary H. T....i..... much food as it does today. In many developing countries, more than half of the people are just entering or are still under reproductive age. Even if these people were to have only two children per family, a near doubling of total population is inevitable. In addition, economic growth will further increase the demand for food.The challenge facing agriculture in the first half of the 21st century is formidable. It must provide adequate nutrition for billions more people and contribute to their economic development, thereby stoking the desire to limit family size. Furthermore, agriculture must accomplish this without jeopardizing the capacity of the natural resource base to meet the needs of future generations. Currently, agriculture does not have the technologies to double or triple food production in developing countries, and so the threat arises that farmers will irreparably damage the natural resource base in their efforts to feed growing populations-this scenario is already becoming a reality in certain locations. Meeting the food challenge will demand the discovery of new knowledge and the development of innovative technologies, which, combined with the broader adaptation and application of existing technologies, will allow greater intensification of production on a sustainable basis.Many of the institutional structures and financial support systems needed to address the food challenge are already in place and can rightly claim an impressive record of accomplishment. International cooperation in plant breeding has been particularly successful in producing improved crop varieties that benefit the developing world. When combined with appropriate management practices, these modem varieties have substantially increased productivity and contributed significantly to food self-sufficiency and economic development in many countries of Asia and Latin America.In Asia, farmers have for centuries used irrigation, organic fertilizer, and hand weeding on their small holdings. More recently, they have readily adopted modem varieties and, using their traditional intensive management practices together with purchased inputs, have in many locations pushed yield per hectare close to the maximum potential. Modern varieties of rice and wheat are now grown on nearly 70 percent of the area planted to these crops in Asia. Because many of these varieties have short growing seasons, farmers can obtain two or three crops per year on fertile land under irrigation. Improved varieties have also been produced for the poorer upland and seasonally flooded regions of Asia, however their performance and rates of adoption have been less dramatic. During the past 20 years, the proportion of the Asian population affected by inadequate nutrition declined from 40 to 19 percent. Nevertheless, Asia still has the greatest number of chronically undernourished people, 528 million, and the largest projected increase in population (FAO 1992;Bongaarts 1994;Lutz et al. 1997).In Latin America, modem varieties have made an enormous impact, however, due to the highly skewed and inequitable distribution of land ~n the region, it is primarily the commercial farmers (who control most of the fertile land) that have adopted them. Production on the larger farms has increased significantly and consumers have benefited from lower prices. However, the majority of Latin American farmers, who work small holdings on less fertile land in the highly heterogeneous hill regions, have not gleaned the benefits offered by modem crop varieties. Developing improved varieties for them is a difficult task and only limited progress has been made. No single elite breeding line is Feedlog rIoo World io tltt 2111 ''''.ry: Pl••IB,eedi.g. 8Io1....oIogy, IIIId Iitt Pot..tlol KIlt of Aponi.1s 3 broadly applicable across such diverse agronomic and socio-economic conditions, and plant breeders are just beginning to provide improved varieties tailored to a few of the multitude of niche environments found in the region.Of the major developing regions, improved varieties have had the least impact in sub-Saharan Africa; food production there has lagged behind rapid population growth. In Africa as a whole, more than 168 million people are chronically undernourished, and, alarmingly, nearly a fourfold increase in population, from 740 million in 1996 to 2.8 billion by the end of the 21st century, is now projected (FAa 1992(FAa , 1998;;Bongaarts 1994). The defining characteristics of African agriculture are its complexity and heterogeneity. Most farmers have small holdings on which they grow a variety of crops, often intercropped with one another. In each of the continent's countries, soils and climate are highly diverse and variable. Economic realities limit the development of irrigation and other forms of yield enhancing and risk averting infrastructure. As in much of Latin America, no elite breeding lines are broadly applicable and improved varieties with specific characteristics need to be Foreign genes and modified genesI I G,\"\" J.. developed for many different types of agronomic and socioeconomic niches. Such niche breeding has been successful in a few locations and has potential for expansion, but it is a slow process when based on conventional breeding technology. Notably, while there is no such thing as low input/high output agriculture, average yields in Africa are so low (often less than It/ha) that a doubling or tripling of production should be possible with locally well-adapted varieties using just minimal inputs. Undoubtedly, better management practices would help boost yields (the use of nutrient and SOil-enhancing crop rota tions and associa tions looks especially promising), but over the long term, greater use of inputs, particularly fertilizer, will be necessary.Modem plant breeding, which revolutionized agriculture in the 20 th century, is now on the verge of significantly extending its technological potential. New genetic monitoring and manipulation tools, in aggregate commonly referred to as biotechnology, are becoming available as a result of advances in molecular and cellular biology. As indicated in Figure 1 4 Gary H. Toe\"'... breeding: the evolutionary phase, in which variable populations are produced, and the evaluation phase, in which desirable genotypes are selected.Variability, at the heart of the evolutionary phase, traditionally has been created by hybridization and to a lesser extent by mutations. Wide hybridization through embryo rescue or somatic hybridization, somaclonal variation, and genetic engineering are biotechnology tools that can dramatically expand the range of variability available to breeders. Genetic engineering, especially, should make the process of generating desirable variability much more predictable and help obtain other goals that are beyond the reach of conventional techniques. Meanwhile, the evaluation phase will become much more efficient through the use of the 1.2 Institutions facilitating the application of biotechnology to international agriculture ISAAA -International Service for Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications, Ithaca, New Yark, USA, is a not-for-profit international organization committed to the acquisition and transfer of proprietary agricultural biotechnologies from the industrial countries for the benefit of the developing world. It assists in identifying biotechnology needs and opportuni~es, evaluates the availability of proprietary lechnologies, serves as an \"honest broker\" that malches needs with available technology, and when necessary mobilizes the financial resources required to implement brokered proposals. ILTAB . International Laboratory for Tropical Agricultural Biotechnology, SI. Louis, Missouri, USA, is a unit of the Dan forth Plant Science (enter. Technology is transferred first from the center, where scientists are engaged in pioneering work on the development of disease resistant plants, to five ILTAB scientists and fellows from developing countries. These scientists use the technology to produce new sources of disease resistance in tropical crops including cassava, rice, sweet potato, and yam. CAMBIA -(enter for the Application of Molecular Biology to International Agriculture, (anberra, Australia is a research and technology transfer organization committed to the applica~on of biotechnology to international agriculture. It specializes in producing inexpensive biotechnology tools that can be effernve~ u~lized in developing countries. ICGEB -International (enter for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology was established by the United Na~ons Industrial Development Organization. It has headquarters and information gathering and dissemina~on facili~es in Trieste, Italy, and agricultural biotechnology research and training facilities in New Delhi, India. ABSP . Agricultural Biotechnology for Sustainable Productivity, East Lansing, Michigan, USA, is a project headquartered at Michigan Slate University and funded by USAID. It is a unique bilateral program in that it supports research at and technology transfer from public and corporate sector crop research insntu~ons to developing countries. IBS . Intermediary Biotechnology Service, The Hague, Netherlands, is a unit of the International Service for Na~onal Agricultural Research (ISNAR). It provides national agricultural research agencies with informa~on, advice, and assistance to help strengthen their agricultural biotechnology capacities and to enable them to establish collaborative arrangements with international biotechnology programs. BA( . Biotechnology Advisory (enter, Stockholm, Sweden, a unit of the Stockholm Environmentlns~tuIe, is an independent resource for impartial biosafety advice. It was established to help developing countries assess the possible environmental, health, and socioeconomic impacts of proposed biotechnology introductions.6 Gary H. T....it....this system together and assuring that it The potential role of apomixis in boosting functions effectively. This system has the yields in the developing world is considerable ability to take relevant scientific discoveries and varies according to region. From a plant from the \"ivory towers\" of academe and, breeding perspective, Asia most needs new through a series of technology transfers and varieties of its staple cereal crops that have collaborative research projects, incorporate the significantly higher yield potentials tha n new knowledge and technology into today's high-yielding varieties. Africa and improved seeds that will be sown in fields Latin America most need a large number of throughout the developing world-and to do improved varieties of food crops, each wellso in an amazingly short time frame. The suited for production in one or more of the improved cultivars and agronomic practices many ecologically and/ or socioeconomically generated by this system have helped literally unique niches that can be found in these billions of people who daily consume the end continents. products. If over the next century we are to Asia must more than double its cereal achieve a stabilized world population fed by production over the next fifty years and do it sustainable agriculture, this unique public on the same or less area than is currently in sector research establishment must also be production. Accomplishing this will require sustained, both financially and technologically.Institutes even more double and triple annual cropping cycles and more extensive use of yieldenhancing technologies such as hybrid seed, by the overwhelming majority of farmers, including those with limited purchasing power. Hybrid seed's potential to increase production has been demonstrated by hybrid rice in China. From 1980 to 1990, China increased its rice production by roughly 32.5 million tons, or 22 percent, while decreasing the area planted to rice by roughly 2.2 million hectares, or six percent (FAO 1990). Yuan Longping, the \"father of hybrid rice\" in China, speculates that full exploitation of the heterosis available in rice could provide another 3D-50 percent increase in yield (Yuan 1993). New hybrid lines that are suitable for other regions of Asia are slowly becoming available. Biotechnological tools (such as genetically engineered male sterility systems for elite breeding lines) and the use of molecular markers to select parental lines that combine high levels of heterosis with other desirable characteristics can accelerate this process and make the use of hybrid rice technology more broadly applicable. And, as reported later in this book, progress is being made on using apomixis as the ultimate tool for fixing heterosis in cereals, thereby making the benefits of hybrid seed available to farmers at minimal cost.African and Latin American farmers could also benefit from hybrid seed that self-replicates tlvough apomixis, although the application of apomixis to niche breeding could yield even more consequential results. If apomixis can be introduced into staple food crops, cultivars that perform well under local conditions could be genetically fixed early in the selection cycle.Under this scheme, variability would be generated through traditional hybridization or any other technique noted in the evolu tionary phase (see Figure 1.1). The resul ting population of plants would be grown and evaluated under local conditions, and the plants that performed best could be selected and quickly developed into genetically stable superior cultivars by incorporating the gene(s) for apomixis. For crops that are normally reproduced from tubers or vegetative cuttings, apomixis would enable the multiplication and dissemination of improved varieties as true seed.In short, apomixis has the potential to make a significant contribution toward meeting food production demand throughout the developing world in the 21sl century. Because of its limited profit potential, this technology will probably not be fully developed in the private sector. Therefore, if the full potential of apomixis as a breeding tool to help the poor is to be realized, the necessary research and development must be undertaken by the public sector international agricultural research system-and the results must remain freely available to public sector crop breeding programs.Apomixis is a mode of reproduction (asexual propagation through seeds) that exists in many plants from different botanical families (review in Asker and Jerling 1992;Carman 1997). It is most frequent in the dicots Rosaceae and Asteraceae and in the moncot Poaceae. Some of these Poaceae genera are tropical forages with wide colonizing ability, e.g., Panicum maximum. From its center of origin in East Africa, through human activities it has expanded to West Africa, where it can be found colonizing roadsides, and to tropical regions of the Americas and Asia.Apomixis attracts considerable theoretical interest as it may help us better understand the sexual mode of reproduction. It is also of practical interest to breeders as a means of genetic fixation, potentially offering the capability of indefinite multiplication of heterotic genetic combinations. In the case of apomictic tropical forages (see Valle and Miles,Chap. 10), the problem faced by breeders is how to overcome apomixis to take advantage of genetic recombination in order to create new genetic combinations to be maintained through apomixis. Another challenge is to transfer apomixis into crops in which heterosis has been well documented. Research projects focused on this goal are underway for pearl millet, Pennisetum glaucum (Hanna et al. 1993) maize (see Savidan,Chap. 11), and wheat (Carman 1992). Rice breeders are also interested as F] hybrids in rice show heterosis (sef~ Toenniessen, Chap. 1). Some scientists have solely pursued the simplest model of apomixis, that with a complete lack of sexuality, i.e., no possibility of recombination and evolution. In this case, population genetics models show a diffusion of apomixis genes into natural populations without a need for some form of selective advantage (Pemes 1971;Marshall and Brown 1981). If this holds true, transferring apomixis to crops could ultimately decrease genetic diversity in those crops and pose a threat to the environment. From modern apomictic varieties, the apomixis gene could move to land races and wild ancestors in their center of origin. In a recent review of apomictic risk, van Dijk and van Damme (2000) based their discussion almost entirely on this model. However, before overstating this possibility, one should know more precisely how apomixis functions, what diversity is conserved in wild populations where apomixis is the dominant mode of reproduction, and how apomixis could be transferred to land races.To address these issues, this chapter discusses (i) genetic variation observed in progeny of apomicts, (ii) diversity observed in wild apomictic populations, (iii) evolutionprocesses of agamic complexes, and (iv) the possibility of transferring apomixis from synthetic apomictic crops to landraces and wild relatives. (RAPDs) have been used (Huff andBara 1993: Barcaccia et a1. 1994). It is difficult to find detailed results of progeny analyses in the literature. Frequently, only morphological distinctions between true (maternal) and offtype progeny are reported.Data on Panicum maximum (Combes 1975) are presented in Table 2.2. In the F 2 generation of a P infeslum x P maximum cross (T19 progeny), frequencies of plants produced through sexuality and of haploid plant production were high. In one case (progeny from T19-36-5),40% of a 177-plant progeny were off-types, including seven haploids. F 2 progeny from other crosses involving accession T19 were less variable; ,only four haploids (n + 0) were found out of 1,500 observed. In P maximum, the proportion of off-types, including 2n + nand n + 11 was 3%, based on a total of 2,100 progeny observed. We can therefore conclude apomixis in P maximum is facultative.For the Parlhenium (Asteraceae) species, Guayule and Mariola, frequencies of the four categories of progeny (Table 2.3) were extracted from Powers and Rollins (1945). Haploid plants were produced at a low rate. Most plants were produced from unfertilized unreduced female gametes, however, the 10M.. Be,th.d categories n + nand 2n + n appeared at signifi-presented in Table 2.5. According to the table, cant rates. Stebbins and Kodani (1944) showed it appears that within one species, but in a frequency of occurrence of 2n+n progeny of various populations, the rate of 2n + n 5.6%, ranging from 0.14% to 49%. Thus, progeny is variable and significant, being apomixis in Parthenillm is largely facultative.quite high in the case of population #39 \"La Toma.\" Experiments are in progress to In Tripsawm we found an average 2.7% (n + analyze the effect of the environment 11) progeny, 8.1% (2/1 + 11), and 89.2% (2n + 0) (flowering and pollination) on the stability of progeny (Table 2.4). From seeds collected in these parameters. wild populations, we analyzed the occurrence of 2n + n progeny (it is difficult to test for n + nFor Dichanthium and Bothriochloa (Poaceae), progeny in this situation because clones are Harlan et al. (1964) reported rates of 211+11 distributed in small niches of land and progeny from crosses between tetraploid interpollination occurs from identical species. These combinations, however, are genotypes, making detection of new isozyme interspecific and therefore are difficult to patterns difficult). The frequencies for three compare with the former examples. Bashaw wild populations of TripsaCllm we observed are et al. (1992) showed that in crosses between from parthenogenetic development of a red uced egg cell, which is the result of meiosis and recombination. When apomixis is active, sexuality is not eliminated but rather distributed over several generations. This topic is discussed in greater detail below.Populations Pernes (1975) described polymorph isms observed in wild populations of PaniclIm maximllm in East Africa, which is the center of diversity for this species. He identified three types of populations: (i) monomorphic populations; (ii) polymorphic, with disjointed variation and distinct genotypes; and (iii) polymorphic, with discrete variation.The latter was discovered in zones where sexual diploids and apomictic tetrap)oids were sympatric. The IRD-CIMMYT team's observations during collections of wild TripsaCllm led to the same typology. In the case of TripsaCllm, however, different species can coexist in the same population. Diploid populations are more frequent than in PaniCllm, and several ploidy levels in within species have been discovered in the same populations.Three different species were found to coexist in a multispecific wild TripsaCllm population (\"La Toma\" population #39) near Tequila, jalisco, Mexico: T pi/osllm, a diploid sexual species, and two apomictic tetraploid species, TbmvlIm and T dacty/aides mexicamlm. Using fingerprinting, restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) and isozymes, M. Barre et a1. (personal comm.) identified most of the diploid plants. Plants belonging to the two tetraploid species were distributed in clones of variable size (Table 2.7). The genetic diversity in this population was distributed among 54 different diploid plants, six triploid clones (11 plants), and 18 tetraploid clones (83 plants). We conclude that there are almost no \"widespread\" genotypes in these populations.Moving from one population to another, new genotypes of the same species are found. In Mexico, populations #38 and #39 ar e about 10 km apart and both contain T bravum and T dactyloides mexicanum. Nevertheless, their genotypes are distinct. As a rule of thumb, the probability of finding distinct genotypes within a distance of 50 to 100 m is quite high.In population #38, we analyzed 94 asexually reproducing triploid and tetraploid plants, distributed in 24 clones, i.e., four plants per genotype on average. Ellstrand and Roose (1987) observed 5.9 plants per clone in a literature survey of studies involving asexually reproducing plants. Wild populations of dandelion (Taraxacum sp, Asteraceae) and Antennaria sp.(Asteraceae) are comparable (Lyman and Ellstrand 1984;Ford and Richards 1985;Bayer 1990).Table 2.7 Distribution of dones in Tripsacum wild population liLa loma l lChromo-Chromo-Type* some no. Size Type* some no. Size In summary, studies of wild populations demonstrate that apomixis does not produce the uniformity that is often simplistically suggested. Diversity is maintained in these populations. Mechanisms generating and maintaining this diversity may involve genetic exchanges between different Tripsacum types and genetic recombination as previously described.In agamic complexes, two pools exist: one is sexual diploid and the other is apomictic polyploid (very often triploids and tetraploids). Plants considered to be apomictic present a certain amount of sexuality, at a rate we will call \"k.\" Authors of reviews on apomixis (Nogler 1984;Asker and Jerling 1992) conclude that facultative apomixis is the most common. Obligate apomixis, when found, occurs when k = 0, and is under the same genetic control as facultative apomixis.In many cases, apomixis and pseudogamy (endosperm produced after fertilization by pollen) are found together. Pseudogamy is the rule for apomictic Poaceae, Rosaceae, and Ranunculaceae. In Taraxacum (Asteraceae), fertilization is not needed for endosperm development (Ford and Richards 1985), while in Part~enium, which belongs to the same family, seeds are produced only after pollination, demonstrating that fertilization is needed for endosperm development (Powers and Rollins 1945).Taraxacum and Parthenium Agamic Complexes (Asteraceae)Taraxacum sp. is present on five continents and about 2,000 species have been described. The base chromosome number is eight, and diploid and tetraploid forms exist. Diploid forms are sexual and, depending on the species, self-incompatible or self-compatible.Polyploid forms are autonomous apomicts, either facultative or obligate. Fruits (propagules) can be obtained without pollination, after eliminating anthers and stigmas (Mogie and Ford 1988).In Parthenillm (Asteraceae), diploid forms with 2n = 2x = 36 are sexual, and polyploid forms with 211 = 54, 72, 90, or 108, are apomictic. In this genus, pseudogamy is prevalent and therefore fruits are not produced in the absence of pollen (Powers and Rollin 1945). Ploidy buildup occurs through production of 211 + 11 progeny (Powers and Rollins 1945), and production of haplOids from hexaploids has been documented (Powers 1945). In this case, a cycle exists between tetraploids, hexaploids, and triploids, with a possibility of incorporating diploid forms into the cycle through their production of 211 + 11 progeny with 54 chromosomes.Agamic Complex (Poaceae)The genera of Capi/lipedium, Dichanthium, al1d Bothriochloa are distributed over Europe, the Mediterranean region, Asia, Australia, and the New World, and have been studied in detail by Harlan, de Wet, and coworkers. De Wet (1968) described a possible evolution in the genus Dichanthium based on ploidy cycles involving diploids, tetraploids, and haploids. In a broader approach, de Wet and Harlan (1970) described the interrelationships between species of the three genera of this agamic complex (Figure 2.1). The most common ploidy levels are 2x, 4x, 6x, as well as some pentaploid forms. Diploids are sexual, and polyploids are apomictic. However, forms from the New World are sexual and polyploid. Triploid forms are not mentioned. Gene flow occurs in several directions, but in some cases is limited by incompatibility barriers. Genetic exchanges between Capillipedium and DiclulI1thium are effective only when species of Bothriochloa are involved as genetic bridges.Apo\";xn ood ,~. M\"\"ogemeo' of 60..,;, Di..,,~y 13Haploid production was detected experimentally and haploid plants were found to be either sexual or sterile. Tetraploid plants can be recovered from these dihaploids through the formation of 2n + n progeny, with n proceeding from pollen of tetraploid plants. Rates of 2n + n production of up to 15% have been observed.\"Guineagrass\" has its origin in East Africa.It has colonized West Africa as well as the tropical areas of the New World. This agamic complex includes three species: Panicum maximum, P. trichocladum, and P. infestum (Combes 1975). Panicum maximum is Widely distributed and sexual diploid forms have been identified (Combes and Pemes 1970), though they are very rare, having only been found in three very limited areas in Tanzania (Combes and Pemes 1970;Nakajima et a!. 1979). The other forms are tetraploid and facultative apomicts. Occasionally, pentaand hexaploid forms have been detected. • 3x ploidy level not found in wild populations •• 5x and 6x overrepresenled in Ihis collection (from over•collecting in these populotions)Table 2.8 shows the distribution of clones according to their ploidy level in a collection established in Cote d'Ivoire.Triploid plants have been experimentally obtained from hexaploids (n + 0 progeny) as well as from diploid x tetraploid crosses. (Poly-) haploids also have been experimentally obtained from tetraploids, and the resultant plants have been either sexual or sterile (potentially apomictic as shown by embryo sac analyses). These findings led Savidan and Pernes (1982) to propose an evolutionary scheme based on ploidy cycles involving di-tetra-haploid levels as in the Dichanthium complex. The change from diploid to tetraploid is realized through 2n + n hybridization with pollen from tetraploid plants. In this system, sexuality is maintained at the diploid level. Contact between diploid and tetraploid plants allows genetic exchange between these pools (compartments) and creation of sexual tetraploid plants, allowing the release of new genetic diversity at the tetraploid level.The center of diversity for the genus Paspalum is in South America. Studies conducted by Quarin (1992), Norrman et al. (1989) and collaborators at the Instituto de Botanica del Nordeste, Corrientes, Argentina (IBONE) show that many species in this genus have genetic pools at two or more ploidy levels (Table 2.9).ln the pool with the lowest ploidy level, plants are sexual and self-incompatible, while in pools with higher ploidy levels, they are apomictic and self-compatible. In many cases, the two pools are at the diploid and tetraploid level (group 3 ofTable 2.9). In some species, however, the sexually selfincompatible plants are tetraploid and the selfcompatible apomictic plants are hexaploid or octoploid (group 6 ofTable 2.9).Some species that are sexual and selfcompatible at the tetraploid or hexaploid level (groups 5 and 7 of Table 2.9) are not apomictic at higher ploidy levels. In other species, triploids are often apomictic and are found in species with sexual diploids and apomictic tetraploids.As with previously cited agamic complexes, sexual forms are found at the lowest ploidy level and apomictic forms at the other levels. However, in this example, the relationship includes the incompatibility system. Apomictic plants are self-eompatible and the corresponding sexual plants are selfincompatible. Experiments should be conducted to determine whether this also occurs in other agamic complexes.The Tripsacum genus is restricted to the New World, from 42°N to 240$. Its center of diversity (or origin) is located in Mexico and Guatemala, and 11 of the 16 species described for the genus are found in this region. These 11 species show different ploidy levels both within and among themselves. The collection the team assembled from Mexico displayed the following distribution (unit = one ploidy level of one species in one population): diploids, 16.4%; triploids, 7.9%; tetraploids, 72%; penta-and hexaploids, 3.7%.When compared to other agamic complexes, a high frequency of triploid plants in the Tripsawm complex was observed. These wild triploid plants are apomictic, produce fertile pollen, and set good seed. All of the natural polyploids we observed were apomictic (Leblanc et al. 1995;and unpublished data).Diploids are sexual, and progeny with 211 + 11 chromosomes from apomictic plants occur at a significant frequency (Tables 2.4 and 2.5). Through this mechanism, many hexaploids were produced experimentally or detected in seeds collected from a wild population. Natural hexaploid plants in wild populations were observed at a lower frequency than in the seed progeny we analyzed.Triploid plants can be obtained in four ways: (i) from 211 + 11 hybridization within diploids, (ii) from crosses between diploid and tetraploid plants, (iii) from haploidization of hexaploids (/1 + aprogeny), or (iv) from asexual propagation of apomictic triploids. Evaluation of these possibilities is currently underway. In addition we have observed the presence of triploids, tetraploids, and hexaploids, and absence of diploids in some wild populations, which suggests that some triploids could have originated from haploidization of hexaploid plants. In populations containing diploids and triploids, there is a possibility of 2/1 + n hybridization, with 2/1 from the triploid female and 11 from a diploid male leading to the production of new tetraploid plants. We have documented such an event in seeds from one wild population. This event shows one possible route of gene exchange from the diploid to the tetraploid genetic pool. We did not discover any sexual tetraploid TripsaCLlm, but In all agamic complexes, two different ploidy pools are found: a lower ploidy pool (usually diploid) with sexual forms and a higher ploidy pool (usually several ploidy levels, the most frequent being the tetraploid level) with apomictic forms. Absence of apomixis at the diploid level is thought to be due to either a lack of expression of this trait at this ploidy level or to an absence of transmission through haploid gametes (Nogler 1984;Grimanelli et al. 1998). The sexual pool is where most of the genetic recombination occurs and is therefore the pool where most of the selection on new combinations is acting. Gene flow from the diploid to the polyploid pool is realized in several ways. Diploid sexual plants, in some cases, can produce 2/1 female gametes (Harlan and de Wet 1975). If these gametes are pollinated by pollen from tetraploid plants, tetraploid progeny will be produced that will be sexual to a certain extent, providing an opportunity for a new burst of diversity to be tested at the tetraploid level. Another flow, as discussed earlier, comes from the pollination of unreduced eggs from triploid plants by normal pollen grains from diploid plants. The triploid plants can result from crosses between diploid and tetraploid plants. As can be seen, many opportunities exist for the diploid pool to contribute to the genetic diversity of the apomictic tetraploid pool. In the A/1tl?l1/1aria complex, several genomes from diploid species can be accumulated in polyploid species (Bayer 1987).In the polyploid apomictic pool, new genetic combinations may also arise through residual sexuality (n + /1 progeny). We have also seen evidence that sexuality is distributed over several generations by creation of 2n + n progeny in one generation, followed by n + 0 progeny in the next generation. By permitting some perenniality for each stage of the sexual cycle, this wealth of genetic recombination is favored by apomixis, and it may be characteristic of the apomictic mode. More experimental data and modeling are required to isolate all of the factors involved in the genetic recombination of apomicts.In the breeding of apomictic forage grasses, sexuality is involved at different steps and permi ts genetic recombination (Valle and Miles 1992; see Valle and Miles,Chap. 10). Released varieties are apomictic and have been distributed mainly outside their centers of diversity. In this instance, breeding activity is generating new genetic diversity.Because projects are now underway to transfer apomixis to pearl millet, maize, wheat, and rice, we must consider the consequences of apomixis on the diversity management of landraces and that apomixis drastically reduces the recombination rate. It is important to remember that these landraces and their wild ancestors represent our current reservoir of genetic diversity. Thought should also be given to conserving the diversity of wild ancestors that grow near fields planted with apomictic varieties, which could be recipients of apomixis genes through naturally occurring gene flow.Projects to transfer apomixis to pearl millet and maize have reached an intermediate stage: advanced generations of interspecific hybrids between apomictic forms and cultivated species have been produced that retain the apomictic trait. In the case of rice, possible sources of apomixis are yet to be identified. For wheat, F} and BC l hybrids between Triticum and Elymus have been produced (Peel et al. 1997;Savidan et al., Chap. 11). Pearl millet and maize are allogamous crops and so methods must be developed to maintain genetically adaptative processes once this new mode of reproduction is introduced. In its current deSign, the Penl1isetum project considers the creation of tetraploid apomictic varieties of pearl millet (Dujardin and Hanna 1989). Upon release, the distinct ploidy levels of currently cultivated millet and the tetraploid apomictic new varieties will act as a genetic barrier between them. Dissemination of apomixis gene(s) from the tetraploid to the diploid levelApooni.~ aod I~. Maoogo....'.f Geoeti< D1ve\"ity 17would involve production of triploid plants, which are usually male sterile; so dissemination through triploids should be negligible. However, in agamic complexes, apomixis seldom occurs at the diploid level. Some mechanism may suppress the expression of apomixis or impeach transmission to the diploid level. In the pearl millet program, there is no clear evidence that apomixis can be expressed at the diploid level. In contrast, a few BC 2 diploid-like hybrids in the maize-Tripsacum program were found to express apomixis (Leblanc et al. 1996). These plants are 211 =28 with x =10 from maize and x =18 fromTripsacum. Furthermore, triploid Tripsacum are male and female fertile. Thus, tetraploid apomictic varieties of maize will probably not restrict diffusion of apomixis gene(s) to other maize lines or its wild ancestor, teosinte. Therefore, the models of diffusion of apomixis discussed below are based on diploidy.Apomixis fixes heterosis, thereby presenting two options for its use: (i) to produce apomictic F 1 hybrids through breeding programs and release them to farmers as end products; and (ii) to release to farmers apomictic varieties that would be used to transfer (diffuse) gene(s) to landraces, which would eventually become apomictic. In the latter case, breeding for apomixis would be a local activi ty. In fact, these two options are complementary and related as they pertain to the diffusion of apomixis gene(s). F1 apomictic hybrids could be released in an area where landraces and wild relatives still exist. The transfer of the gene to these landraces and wild relatives will depend on the parameters cited above in option 2.We deduce from Sherwood (see Chap. 5), that apomixis is probably initiated by one dominant gene (see also Valle and Savidan 1996). The active A allele of this \"apomixis gene\" would be found mostly in the heterozygous condition (Aa). The homozygous stage (AA) has been considered lethal in some cases (Nogler 1984). Nevertheless, in discussing apomixis transfer, we will consider three models: (i) apomixis is active as a dominant trait, either heterozygous or homozygous (Aa or AA) with the recessive homozygote (aa) being sexual; (ii) apomixis is active only as a heterozygote (Aa), with the recessive homozygote (an) being sexual; and(iii) apomixis is only expressed as a recessive homozygote (ss), while sS and SS are sexual. We will also consider a residual rate of sexuality, k, in apomictic plants, with 0 < k < 1.Simple models of population genetics predict, in the absence of selection, the diffusion of the apomixis gene (Pemes 1971;Marshall and Brown 1981). According to the models, it is possible for the apomixis gene to transfer to land races, such as maize or pearl millet, and to inadvertently move to wild relatives (Pemes 1971;van Dijk and van Damme 2000).In model 1, there is one dominant allele for apomixis and three categories of genotypes at generation n: AA (apomictic) at a frequency of P n . Aa (apomictic) at a frequency of 2Qn, and aa (sexual) at a frequency of R n . Gametes for generation n+1 are distributed according to the following frequencies: male gametes A have a frequency of P n + Q n and gametes a have a frequency of Q n + R ; female gametes A have n a frequency of 0, gametes a, a frequency of R n , gametes AA, a frequency of P n , and gametes Aa a frequency of 2Qn' Three genotypes will appear at generation n + 1 with the following frequencies (random mating of gametes): AA at a frequency of P n + I = P n , Aa at a frequency of2Q n + 1 = 2Q n + Rn(Pn + Qn)' and nn at a frequency of R nWith Pn+ 2Q n + R n =1, we obtain Q =1/2(1n Pn-R n ) and the recurrence relation:Equilibrium is reached for R = 1, the population being entirely sexual, or for R = 0, the population being completely apomictic. This model is identical to the model proposed by Fisher (1941) for autogamy. In fact, apomictic plants self-reproduce, however they simultaneously release pollen with the dominant allele to the sexual plant forms; consequently, a portion of the progeny of sexual forms becomes apomictic.If we take into account a rate of residual sexuality, k, the variation in frequency for A allele becomes Pn+ 1 + Q n + I = (Pn + Qn)(1 +1/ 2(l-k)R n ) (pemes 1971).The change in frequency of allele A from generation n to generation n + 1 is a function of Rn, the frequency of the recessive allele, and a function of k. A zero value for k (obligate apomixis) maximizes the frequency of A, while higher values of k reduce the frequency of A. This variation would be zero if k = 1, i.e., when all plants are sexual with either the A ora allele.In this model, we assume random mating of gametes. Transfer would be favored if an apomictic variety, homozygous for A, were interplanted with the variety (land race) to be modified. In the case of maize, by detasselling and harvesting only the land race, only heterozygous progeny would be produced. These new plants would be apomictic and genetically fixed. Their ability to evolve would rely on'the rate of residual sexuality, k. A proportion k of the apomictic forms can be ferti lized by pollen from other sources. Moreover, pollen from the first generation of apomictic forms can be used to pollinate the landrace. After several cycles of suc!\"1 backcrossing, the new variety will be identical to the land race except that it carries the apomixis gene. Evolution in these \"new\" landraces will depend on the rate of residual sexuality that is retained at the end of the transfer process.In model 2, apomixis is active in plants with the Aa association of alleles. The aa genotypes are sexual. If Rn is the frequency of aa genotypes (sexual) and Qn is the frequency of Aa genotypes (apomictic), frequencies in the next generation (n + 1) will be R nIn this case, the apomixis allele, A, diffuses in the population as 1 + 1/2Rn >1 and Qn + 1>Qn.We can use this model to define conditions of equilibrium between sexual and apomictic forms if a differential fitness exists between the two forms. With a fitness of 1 + S for the an and 1 for the Aa, the frequency changes from generation n to generation n + 1 are as follows:In this case, equilibrium between sexual and apomictic forms will be reached for s = 1/1 + R. Initially, when apomixis starts to be established in a population, R is close to 1, and equilibrium can be reached with s values close to 0.5. The fitness advantage of the sexual forms in relation to the apomictic forms has to be at least 1.5:1 to reach the equilibrium. Once apomixis is widely established, R is lower, and equilibrium will be reached only with higher s values. In the extreme case of Q close to 1, equilibrium will be reached with s values close to 1. In this instance, sexual forms will have to produce twice as many seeds as apomictic forms to survive in the successive generations.If model 2 applies to apomictic varieties, transfer of apomixis to land races could be accomplished according to the process found in model 1; but the transfer will take longer (at least one more generation) because the first generation will be made from Aa x aa crosses producing Aa and aa genotypes, not from AA x aa crosses, which produce only Aa progeny. In model 3, apomixis is active only in plants that are homozygous for the recessive allele s. In this case, 55 (sexual) has a frequency of Pn, 5s (sexual) has a frequency of 2Qn, and ss (apomictic) has a frequency of Rn. Using this model, it can be shown (Pemes 1971) that the frequency of 5 behaves as follows:The frequency of 5 is reduced from one generation to the next, as 1 -1/2Rn is always lower than 1.If the genetic control of apomixis follows this model, then transfer of apomixis will require at least two generations. The pathway to transfer can be imagined as follows: The apomixis gene can diffuse within the population through backcrossing between plant& from the first generation and the donor variety as male parent. In order to have apomixis transferred within a reasonable timeframe, the donor must be used as the male variety of each generation. After several backcrosses, the local variety will be transformed to an apomictic variety, but it will be almost identical to the donor variety. Therefore, if apomixis is active only when recessive alleles are present, it will be difficult to transfer apomixis to land races while at the same time maintaining the original traits of these landraces. It would require (i) the use of markers to retain the a allele, (ii) the production of near isogenic lines through backcrossing with the landrace, and (iii) the selfing of isogenic, heterozygous (Aa) lines to produce aa apomicts.In Tripsacum, we saw an average of 10% of progeny come from 2n + n hybridization; in some samples, this rate rises to 35%. Crosses between apomictic species of Pennisetum also produced this type of progeny (Bashaw et al. 1992). These forms are less frequent in other species, such as Panicum maximum. If this trait is inherited during the transfer of apomixis, what behavior can be expected from cultivated apomictic forms?The transfer projects now underway consider a type of apomixis linked to pseudogamy. Once apomictic varieties are produced, most probably they will be also pseudogamous. In this case, we are concerned with the ratio between embryo ploidy and endosperm ploidy, as it has been often reported that a ratio different from 2:3 (or 2:5) would introduce some developmental incompatibility at the seed level and a loss in productivity (endosperm development also depends on maternal:paternal genome ratio; see Chap. 6,11,12,and 13). However, for the Tripsacum, we observed that triploid plants produce seeds even when their pollen environment comes mostly from tetraploid plants. In this case, the ploidy ratio between embryo and endosperm is 3:8. The 2n + n progeny we detected were from normal seeds with normally developed endosperm. In Tripsacl/m, the 2:3 ratio (or 2:5) between embryo ploidy and endosperm ploidy does not appear to be necessary for seed filling. In general terms, we have two hypotheses to consider:1. Endosperm development is deficient when the ratio of embryo ploidy to endosperm ploidy is different from 2:3 (or 2:5). In this case, ears display poorly filled kernels (with 2n + n embryo) at harvest time. There is a potential loss of production due to the presence of these 2n + n embryos, but these kernels would not be selected as seed for the next generation. 2. Endosperm development is not affected by a ratio of embryo ploidy to endosperm ploidy different from 2:3 (or 2:5). In this case, kernels with 2n + n embryos would go undetected and could be used as seed for the next generation. Apomictic plants obtained from such embryos are triploid; they may produce normal seeds but the pollen could be sterile, which could limit field production. If the pollen is still fertile, as noted with triploid Tripsac!lm, no loss in production should be detected. However, ploidy buildup will occur, and many different ploidy levels will be stored in the same variety. This ploidy buildup could raise chromosome numbers to levels far above the optimum for productivity, potentially resulting in lower production. In nature, 211 + n progeny production is a strategy that takes advantage of genetic recombination, as these plants would give rise, after meiosis, to some haploid progeny by parthenogenetic development of reduced embryo sacs. In the case of an apomictic crop, it is a trai t tha t should be reduced or eliminated.For the purpose of discussing the relationship between wild relatives and apomictic varieties, we will use the maize-teosinte model, however, it is our belief that it can be extrapolated to pearl millet in instances where wild relatives are still in contact with cultivated plants. Teosinte is only found in Mexico and Guatemala. Relationships between wild relatives and maize are not identical over the distribution area of teosinte. The variety paruiglumis may be found in southwest Mexico and is considered to be a very wild form, with almost no link to modem maize. In the states of Michoacan and Mexico, teosinte should be considered a weed. An incompatibility system exhibited by these weedy teosintes, which efficiently controls gene flow from maize to teosinte, has been detected and analyzed (Kermicle and Allen 1990). Moreover, as described by Wilkes (1967), teosintes generally have a flowering period that is distinct from maize. These mechanisms limit gene flow between this wild relative and maize.If we use model 1 to explain the transfer of apomixis from apomictic plants to landraces, we can envisage the following process. The first generation hybrid between teosinte (sexual, aa) and apomictic maize (AA) would be apomictic (Aa), and BC I plants with teosinte as female would produce Aa (apomictic) and aa (sexual) progeny. At each generation, the apomictic forms are fixed but they still participate in the next generation from sexual plants through their pollen, which can transfer the apomixis allele to sexual plants. Therefore, a portion of each generation's progeny becomes apomictic. We can then deduce that the apomictic allele will diffuse into the wild population. However, the assumptions made to simplify the model may not prove accurate when applied to the relationship between cultivated plants and wild relatives.Cultivated maize and its wild teosinte relatives are, morphologically, widely distinct. Apomictic maize x teosinte F] hybrids will be apomictic and will breed true. Sexual maize x teosinte Fls are known to have a low fitness due to their intermediate morphology and adaptation, and they are easily recognized morphologically. When they grow in a field, they are not harvested. However, if the hybrid is apomictic, its pollen will transmit the A allele at a rate of 50%. Pollination efficiency depends on synchronization between flowering of these Apooohis aod Ih ......,.1 Gnelk DivenIty 21 hybrids and the wild relatives. As a lack of synchronization between the two types of plants is anticipated, the gene flow between them should be minimal. These observations deviate considerably from the assumptions posited in the model in which apomictic plants are expected to engage in pollination in proportion to their frequency in the population. Moreover, in the long run, the apomictic intermediate forms should have a lower fitness than the sexual forms, because the latter can take advantage of more new recombinations and adapt faster to environmental changes. As noted earlier, a stable polymorphism between sexual and apomictic forms is possible when fitness values of the two forms reach a certain ratio. We have also observed that the speed of apomixis diffusion is a function of the rate of residual sexuality-a high level of residual sexuality will slow apomixis diffusion.We base our models for apomixis diffusion on the hypothesis that this mode of reproduction is under a simple genetic control. Current knowledge about the mechanisms underlying apomixis, however, is very incomplete, especially regarding the expression of an apomixis gene in a new genetic background, as would be the case with a Tripsacum apomixis gene transferred into a maize background. If genetic control of apomixis in landraces and new varieties involves several genes or a major gene and modifiers, the dynamics of diffusion will be more difficult to describe and transformation of current varieties to apomictic varieties would have to be carried out by professional breeders. In this instance, apomixis could be used as a genetic fixation tool and new varieties with a complex genetic structure could be created and released. Such varieties would contribute to the maintenance of diversity at the farmer's field level.Furthermore, if apomixis is controlled by multiple genes, the probability of diffusing this trait to wild relatives is extremely low. A wild plant would need to receive several genes (probably on several different chromosomes) from the cultivated plant to become apomictic. This transfer would certainly lower its fitness to a value unacceptable for survival in the wild.If apomixis is under a simple genetic control, diffusion of apomixis to landraces and wild relatives is possible. Apomixis reduces recombination rates and could be perceived as a danger for conservation of genetic diversity of wild relatives and landraces. In actuality, current genetic diversity is the result of a long process of domestication, which is still underway in some regions of the world, especially where wild and cultivated plants continue to exchange genes, often within a traditional agricultural system. Somewhat surprisingly, it is in regions where traditional agriculture prevails that apomixis could be the most helpful. We know that obligate apomixis is an exception and facultative apomixis is predominant (Asker 1979). If during the transfer of apomixis to crops, residual sexuality is also transmitted and expressed in the new apomictic crop, we could rely•on the rate of recombination inherent in this process to generate new genetic combinations. Even at low rates, new combinations may be interesting to farmers who could select and propagate them easily. As long as apomixis is not obligate, landraces can still evolve. It may also be possible to introduce new genes from \"exotic\" and modem sexual varieties. Crosses will occur only in the proportion k (rate of residual sexuality). But if these new products can be detected by markers or by their hybrid vigor, following selection, they could serve as an important source of seed for the next generation. The possibility and rate of evolution of these apomictic varieties will eventually depend upon the rate of residual sexuality; therefore, it will be important to consider this paramet-er when transferring apomixis from wild apomixis donor plants to first apomictic varieties. This rate of residual sexuality may depend on genetic factors. Controlling these factors, in order to adapt the value of this parameter in new apomictic varieties, could be extremely useful as we seek to conserve the genetic diversity of landraces and allow for their continual evolution.Areas of traditional agriculture are repositories for most of the genetic diversity of crops. The conservation of this diversity is threatened, however, by changes in technical practices that can suppress current gene flow and by the introduction of new modern varieties with limited genetic diversity (e.g., F j hybrids). Producing new varieties from local germplasm may be advantageous to farmers, and it could be more easily accomplished if apomixis is incorporated into the breeding scheme (see Toenniessen,Chap.1). In this scenario, landraces with high genetic diversity would be maintained in these farming systems, thus limiting the diffusion of varieties with low genetic diversity. This diversity would serve as a reservoir for future evolution.Apomixis has traditionally been separated into asexual seed production (agamospermy) and replacement of flowers by vegetative propagules (vivipary). In practice, many researchers define apomixis as agamospermy, which in turn is divided into adventitious embryony and gametophytic apomixis. Adventitious embryony is the formation of somatic embryos from ovular tissues outside the embryo sac, although endosperm in the embryo sac usually is necessary to support their maturation, and the resulting somatic embryos sometimes compete with a zygotic embryo within the same ovule. Gametophytic apomixis is, at the least, a two-step process involving the production of a 2n megagametophyte, whose egg develops without fusion of egg and sperm nuclei; other aspects of fertilization can be completely normal or completely missing, depending on the type.Adventitious embryony can be divided into nucellar and integumentary embryony, depending on where the embryos arise. According to Naumova (1993), adventitious embryos in nature always originate from single cells, termed embryocytes, which can differentiate in the nucellus or integuments, before or after fertilization of the embryo sac. As summarized by Naumova (1993), the early organization of adventitious embryos characteristically differs from that of zygotic embryos, possibly because space is constrained and the mechanical stress field in the nucellus differs from that in the embryo sac. Multiple adventitious embryos can develop asynchronously within the same ovule (Gustafsson 1946), whereupon competition and packing further affect their morphology. Polyembryony is very frequent in most cases of adventitious embryony, and fertilization of the central cell is generally necessary for seed set. The developmental interpretation of adventitious embryony is simple: the embryocytes are induced to act like zygotes. The number of ways in which this induction can occur is not known, but they all must cause repeated mitosis.In gametophytic apomixis, 2n embryo sacs can arise in at least nine different ways, depending on the species. The embryo and endosperm in such embryo sacs can develop in at least five ways. Therefore, at least 45 types of gametophytic apomixis are theoretically possible, but only half of these account for nearly all cases of naturally occurring gametophytic apomixis. The nine types are schematically diagrammed in Figure 3.1, which lays out their proposed developmental basis. The types are described below (references are given afterward as part of a historical perspective). Note that \"strike\" (nondivision or precocious degeneration of nuclei in the chalazal end of developing (1a\"lfi