 In this line of reasoning, the Court referenced "San Antonio School District v. Rodriguez" ' which said, in relevant part, that the judiciary must look to the Constitution, rather than to the stated "importance" of a right, when determining whether that right was, indeed, fundamental.Because New York's ban did not infringe upon a fundamental right, and because respondents were not claiming that the "right to die" was fundamental, the Court reiterated its policy of according such laws a great deal of leeway.In the Court's own words, from "Heller v. Doe", ' laws such as those enacted by New York were entitled to a "strong presumption of validity."