 They asserted that the claims that Phule made lacked consistency.In response to his argument that brahmans were Aryan invaders who established and enforced a religion and social system to benefit them and keep them in power, they argued that Phule did not have the authority to rewrite history.For how could he go against the writings of the "Ramayana" and "Bhagavad Gita", and who was he to declare the truth of the alternate history he had created?