 If an individual were able to have their remarks regarding the concept of Wikipedia Art published in a source that was acceptable for a , it could be cited and included in the article.Deletionists argued that the article's premise—an art experiment in the form of a Wikipedia article, with the goal of generating controversy among Wikipedia users to legitimize the article itself—rendered it un-encyclopedic, and inclusionists argued that since the Wikipedia Art article had been referenced by multiple online art journals, it qualified as encyclopedic material.In response, deletionists contended that the sources used to legitimize the article were unreliable regardless of if the article was legitimate in the first place.