 Although the complaint named over conveyed in such manner, the suit involved only the portion of that land held by the two counties.As damages, the tribes asked only for the fair rental value of the lands from the period January 1, 1968 through December 31, 1969.The District Court held that the complaint asserted only state law claims, implicating federal law only indirectly, and thus granted the motion to dismiss under the well-pleaded complaint rule.