 Clark argued that the evidence was insufficient for a reasonable juror to find beyond a reasonable doubt that Clark knew that the ID on the check belonged to an actual person.The court concluded that a reasonable juror could infer that Clark (as a bank account holder and prior identity thief) knew that banks only open accounts and give credit to real people.A defendant may move for judgment of acquittal after the government closes its evidence or all evidence under rule 23  of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.