 Though the arguments brought by the Institute for Monitoring Peace and Cultural Tolerance in School Education, formerly known as the Center for Monitoring Impact and Peace have been heavily disputed.In particular, according to Prof. Nathan J Brown, CMIP's "method was to follow harsh criticisms with quotation after quotation purporting to prove a point...In short, the CMIP reports read as if they were written by a ruthless prosecuting attorney anxious for a conviction at any cost...Exaggerated rhetoric, charges of anti-Semitism and racism, and denial of the significance of existing changes in the curriculum will hardly convince any one further improvements are worth the effort."