 Warmus' attorney questioned why the glove, which was found by Solomon in a closet between the first and second trial, was allowed as evidence, and argued that the prosecution failed to provide definitive proof that the glove belonged to Warmus or that it was the same glove as the one pictured in the crime scene photographs.The judge allowed the glove to stand as evidence in the case.The defense continued to press its argument that Solomon was trying to frame Warmus for the murder.