 In "Illinois v. Rodriguez" (1990), the Supreme Court held that a search was valid if the police reasonably believed that the party giving consent had actual authority over the premises, but were incorrect in their belief.When two co-occupants are present, and one consents to a search but the other expressly objects, the Supreme Court has found that the police cannot validly search the premises.However, if the objecting party is subsequently lawfully arrested and removed from the premises, the Court has held in "Fernandez v. California" (2014) that the police may search with the consent of the co-occupant remaining on the premises.