 Justice Loiselle dissented from the majority opinion, arguing that education is not a fundamental right in Connecticut and that Article Tenth of the constitution specifically authorized the legislature to delegate the responsibility of raising most of the funds for education to the towns.He did not find the unequal education expenditures to be so irrational as to be offensive to equal rights.He said the state's system of financing was not the product of purposeful discrimination, but was rooted in years of experience in this and other states.