 It ridiculed the various schools of interpretation, stating Aderca's regret at ever having contributed to literary criticism.Crohmălniceanu mainly sees Aderca as an energetic "Sburătorist" writer, whose presence in the pages of "Contimporanul" did not signify his actual affiliation to that rival circle.He suggests that Aderca was in equal measure a member of two separate subgroups of "Sburătorul" writers