 In another similar case, "South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe", the court echoed similar sentiments, stating that Congress used clear statutory language to diminish the boundaries of the Yankton Sioux Reservation and that the agreement to pay for these lands further supported that they had been ceded through the statute.The tests of "Solem" as to whether Congress has property disestablished the reservation boundary, arose in "Sharp v. Murphy", a case involving the reservations of the Five Civilized Tribes that cover most of the eastern half of the state of Oklahoma, as to whether to determine if a person accused of murder should be under jurisdiction of the state if the reservations were disestablished or the federal system otherwise.The Tenth Circuit used "Solem" to find that Congress did not explicitly disestablish these reservations, and its decision is currently scheduled to be reheard by the Supreme Court in the 2019 term.