 Archibald v. Braverman

Archibald v. Braverman, (1969), was a case decided by the California Court of Appeals that first ruled that visual perception of an accident was not a necessary prerequisite to recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress under the criteria enunciated in "Dillon v. Legg".The holding in "Archibald" was later overruled by the 1989 case "Thing v. La Chusa".