 Additionally, in both "PETA" and "Lamparello", the website in question had links to items for sale.The distinction between the two cases may have been that in "PETA", the defendant registered numerous other websites for cybersquatting purposes.The utilization of the bad-faith factors of the ACPA has been criticized by some scholars for leading to counterintuitive results when applied to cases that are not clear-cut cybersquatting.