 In any case, the 2005 cladistic analysis uses a representative sample of Procellariiformes and recovers them as strongly supported clade in agreement with the current consensus.The presumed close relationship between bony-toothed birds and tubenoses can thus be disregarded after all.As regards "Pelecaniformes", the analysis does not recover the correct phylogeny and does not include the shoebill ("Balaeniceps rex", a "missing link" between pelicans and storks) either; clearly, the adaptive radiation of the pelican-stork lineage is misleading the analysis here.