 To contrast "PLOS One"s handling of the problem, she used a 12-year history of retraction of the fraudulent paper on vaccine and autism by "The Lancet" and the lack of a retraction of a debunked study on "arsenic life" by "Science".Others added the history of the article in "Nature" on "water memory" that was not retracted either.Jonathan Eisen, chair of the advisory board of a sister journal "PLOS Biology" and an advocate for open-access, commended "PLOS One" for their prompt response on social media, which in his words "most journals pretend doesn't even exist".