 Shortly after the decision, an article appeared in the "Law Quarterly Review", written by Peter Millett QC, suggesting how the traditional trust need for certainty of objects (beneficiary) could be squared with the decision of the House of Lords and the refusal to accept new categories of purpose trust in equity.In "Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley", the House of Lords reviewed the law, and the leading judgment was given by Lord Millett, whose judicial analysis unsurprisingly closely mirrored what he had suggested twenty years previously.The key issue, according to Lord Millett, in upholding the trust concept is ascertaining where the beneficial interest in the money lies.