 In "Twinsectra v Yardley", Lord Millett spent some time considering the necessary intention.It has long been settled law that a person need not have a specific intention to create an express trust so long as the court can determine from the person's intention that a beneficial entitlement should be conferred which the law (or equity) will enforce.Thus, in "Twinsectra", where there was a solicitor's undertaking that the money should be used for only one purpose, that was held to be sufficient intent.