 Yet, at the same time, the insurers would seek to avoid taking such action without cause, since it could be costly and result in boycotts against the insurer itself.Chapter 9, "Dealing with Coercion", argues that punishment in the form of eye for an eye vengeance does nothing to compensate the victim, and therefore opposes justice.It argues that an aggressor should repay the victim for his loss and for all expenses occasioned by the aggression, such as the cost of apprehending the offender.