 Hadacheck contended that the removal of clay from his land was not physically impossible, but was prohibitively expensive.The Court held that even though relocating the brick factory would be costly, the ordinance did not amount to a complete denial of the use of Hadacheck's property, because the ordinance did not completely deny Hadacheck the use of the clay on his land.The Court further held that the ordinance did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.