 See, e.g., "Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council", 505 U.S. 1003 (1992), "First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles" (1987).The general approach to this question was summed up in "Agins v. City of Tiburon", 447 U.S. 255 (1980) which states that the application of land-use regulations to a particular piece of property is a taking only "if the ordinance does not substantially advance legitimate state interests ... or denies an owner economically viable use of his land.