 And in this context the Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld land-use regulations that adversely affected recognized real property interests.Zoning laws are the classic example; see "Hadacheck v. Sebastian", 239 U.S. 394 (1915) (prohibition of brickyard operations within certain neighborhoods); "Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co.", 272 U.S. 365 (1926) (prohibition of industrial use); "Gorieb v. Fox", 274 U.S. 603, 608 (1927) (requirement that portions of parcels be left unbuilt); "Welch v. Swasey", 214 U.S. 91 (1909) (height restriction), which have been viewed as permissible governmental action even when prohibiting the most beneficial use of the property.However, zoning restrictions may not deny an owner "any" economically viable use of his land.