 Piketty's response noted, however, that Góes used measures of income inequality rather than wealth inequality, and inappropriately took the interest rate on sovereign debt as his index of the rate of return on capital, which makes his results not commensurate with those of Piketty's study.In a similar vein, philosopher Nicholas Vrousalis faults Piketty's remedies for misconstruing the kind of political "counter-agency" required to remove the inequalities Piketty criticizes and for thinking that they are compatible with capitalism.Norwegian economist and journalist Maria Reinertsen compares the book to the 2014 book ", "by Ailsa McKay and Margunn Bjørnholt, arguing that, "while "Capital in the Twenty-First Century" barely touches the boundaries of the discipline in its focus on the rich, "Counting on Marilyn Waring" challenges most limits of what economists should care about".