 This position, which is mainly motivated by economics and financial profit in particular, demonstrates the main argument for global waste trade.The Cato Institute published an article supporting global waste trade suggesting that “there is little evidence that hazardous wastes, which are often chronic carcinogens, contribute to death rates in developing countries.” Elaborating on this point, the article argues that “people in developing countries would rationally accept increased exposure to hazardous pollutants in exchange for opportunities to increase their productivity—and, hence, their income.”

Overall, the argument for global waste trade rests largely upon a perception that developing countries need to further their economic development.Supporters suggest that in engaging in global waste trade, developing countries of the Global South will expand their economies and increase profits.