 The trial judge instructed the jury that a "false" statement is one that is both incorrect and known to be incorrect at the time that it was made.A "fraudulent" statement, he said, was one that was false and made with an intent to deceive.The Sniders argued in their appeal, on the other hand, that the word "false" should include the intent to deceive, or in the alternative, that "false or fraudulent" meant "false "and" fraudulent."