 The group connected exposure to different types of "salacious" magazines and pornography to atheism, homosexuality, juvenile delinquency, masturbation, murder, sexually transmitted diseases and "high school sex clubs", but did not provide evidence for its claims.Although the group's actions emphasized the protection of minors, "First Amendment Law Review" wrote that "at times the organization seemed to be using children as a pretext for a society-wide ban".The group maintained that they were fighting obscenities and not advocating censorship.