 In 2002, the trial court in the case ruled that these only referred to actual cash receipts Disney collected and denied Wolf's claim.In its January 2004 ruling, the California Court of Appeal disagreed, finding that expert testimony introduced by Wolf regarding the customary use of "gross receipts" in the entertainment business could support a broader reading of the term.The ruling vacated the trial court's order in favor of Disney and remanded the case for further proceedings.