title: BBC News (TV channel)

text: The channel was criticised at launch for its style of presentation, with accusations of it being less authoritative than the BBC One news bulletins, with presenters appearing on-screen without jackets. Jenny Abramsky had originally planned to have a television version of the informal news radio channel BBC Radio 5 Live, or a TV version of Radio 4 News FM both of which she had run. The bright design of the set was also blamed for this – one insider reportedly described it as a "car crash in a shower" – and was subject to the network relaunch on 25 October 1999. The channel swapped studios with sister channel BBC World, moving to studio N8 within the newsroom, where it remained until 2008. New music and title sequences accompanied this set change, following the look of newly relaunched BBC One bulletins.


title: BBC News (TV channel)

text: Graphics and titles were developed by the Lambie-Nairn design agency and were gradually rolled out across the whole of BBC News, including a similar design for regional news starting with "Newsroom South East" and the three 'BBC Nations' – Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The similarity of main BBC News output was intended to increase the credibility of the channel as well as aiding cross-channel promotion.


title: BBC News (TV channel)

text: A graphics relaunch in January 2007 saw the channel updated, with redesigned headline straplines, a redesigned 'digital on-screen graphic' and repositioned clock. The clock was originally placed to the left hand side of the channel name though following complaints that this could only be viewed in widescreen, it was moved to the right in February 2007. Bulletins on BBC World News and BBC One also introduced similar graphics and title sequences on the same day.


title: BBC News (TV channel)

text: In 2008, the graphics were again relaunched, using the style introduced in 2007 and a new colour scheme. The typeface of the on-screen text was changed from Helvetica to Gill Sans.


title: BBC News (TV channel)

text: In 2013 the graphics were changed again, to coincide with the move to New Broadcasting House. The typeface was changed back to Helvetica.


title: BBC News (TV channel)

text: These were updated again in July 2019 when the BBC redesigned its on-air look with the growth of Television viewing on Smartphones and Tablets. These included again redesigned, larger headline straplines sharply contrasting with the background (drawing criticism for obscuring content) using the BBC Reith typeface with larger text. Despite this, the 2008 titles and music continue to be used for the updated Local titles.


title: BBC News (TV channel)

text: The Lambert Report into the channel's performance in 2002 called upon News 24 to develop a better brand of its own, to allow viewers to differentiate between itself and similar channels such as Sky News. As a direct result of this, a brand new style across all presentation for the channel launched on 8 December 2003 at 09:00. Philip Hayton and Anna Jones were the first two presenters on the set, the relaunch of which had been put back a week due to previous power disruptions at Television Centre where the channel was based. The new designs also featured a dynamic set of titles for the channel; the globe would begin spinning from where the main story was taking place, while the headline scrolled around in a ribbon; this was occasionally replaced by the BBC News logo. The titles concluded with a red globe surrounded by a red stylised clamshell and BBC News ribbons forming above the BBC News logo.


title: BBC News (TV channel)

text: Bulletins on BBC One moved into a new set in January 2003 although retained the previous ivory Lambie-Nairn titles until February 2004. News 24 updated the title colours slightly to match those of BBC One bulletins in time for the 50th anniversary of BBC television news on 5 July 2004.


title: BBC News (TV channel)

text: An important part of the channel's presentation since launch has been the top of the hour countdown sequence, since there is no presentation system with continuity announcers so the countdown provides a link to the beginning of the next hour. A similar musical device is used on BBC Radio 5 Live, and mirrors the pips on BBC Radio 4.


title: BBC News (TV channel)

text: Previous styles have included a series of fictional flags set to music between 1997 and 1999 before the major relaunch, incorporating the new contemporary music composed by David Lowe, and graphics developed by Lambie-Nairn. Various images, originally ivory numbers fully animated against a deep red background, were designed to fit the pace of the channel, and the music soon gained notoriety, and was often satirised and parodied in popular culture, perhaps most famously by comic Bill Bailey who likened the theme music to an "apocalyptic rave". Images of life around the UK were added in replacement later with the same music, together with footage of the newsroom and exterior of Television Centre. The 2003 relaunch saw a small change to this style with less of a metropolitan feel to the footage.


title: BBC News (TV channel)

text: A new sequence was introduced on 28 March 2005, designed and created by Red Bee Media and directed by Mark Chaudoir. The full version ran for 60 seconds, though only around 30 seconds were usually shown on air. The music was revised completely but the biggest change came in the footage used – reflecting the methods and nature of newsgathering, while a strong emphasis was placed on the BBC logo itself. Satellite dishes are shown transmitting and receiving red "data streams". In production of the countdown sequence, Clive Norman filmed images around the United Kingdom, Richard Jopson in the United States, while BBC News cameramen filmed images from Iraq, Beijing (Tiananmen Square), Bund of Shanghai, Africa, as well as areas affected by the 2004 Asian tsunami and others.


title: BBC News (TV channel)

text: The sequence has since seen several remixes to the music and a change in visuals to focus more on the well-known journalists, with less footage of camera crews and production teams. Changes have also seen the channel logo included during the sequences and at the end, as well as the fonts used for the time. The conclusion of the countdown was altered in 2008 to feature the new presentation style, rather than a data stream moving in towards the camera. Also in 2008, the graphic for the countdown changed, resembling BBC One Rhythm and Movement Idents, due to the logo being in a red square in inferior-left corner.


title: BBC News (TV channel)

text: To coincide with the move of BBC News to Broadcasting House, on 18 March 2013 the countdown was updated again along with several other presentation elements. Three of the most striking features of the new countdown include music performed by the BBC Concert Orchestra, a redesign of the "data streams" and the ending of the sequence no longer fading to the BBC News globe and logo, but instead stopping with a time-lapse shot outside the corporation's headquarters. The countdown was also extended to 87 seconds, which was fully shown before the first hour from Broadcasting House. In 2019, the countdown started using the BBC's new Reith font but otherwise retained the same style.


title: BBC News (TV channel)

text: A full three-minute version of the countdown music was made available on BBC News Online and David Lowe's own website after a remix on 16 May 2006.


title: BBC News (TV channel)

text: An international version of the countdown was launched on BBC World News on 5 September 2005 featuring more international content and similar music. Various changes have been made to the music and visuals since then, with presentation following the style of BBC News. The visuals in the sequence were updated on 10 May 2010. In June 2011, further imagery was added relating to recent events, including the conflict in Libya and views of outside 10 Downing Street. In January 2013, as part of the relocation of BBC News to Broadcasting House in Central London, BBC World News received a new countdown in the same style as the BBC News Channel's updated countdown, with some minor differences.


title: BBC News (TV channel)

text: In April 2021, a new sombre countdown was played, with no "data streams" and slower shots of places within the UK. An international version using the same music with timelapse shots across the world. Both were introduced to run up to programmes immediately following the Death of Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh. The countdown was revived following the Death of Queen Elizabeth II


title: BBC News (TV channel)

text: The Daily Telegraph reported in November 2021, "BBC News reaches 370,000 for its best performing slots".


title: Arunraja Kamaraj

text: Arunraja Kamaraj is a singer, lyricist, actor, director in Tamil-language films. He is known for his works as lyricist in films such as "Jigarthanda", "Theri", "Pencil" and "Kabali". He also debuted as an actor in "Raja Rani" and appeared as Neruppu Kumar in the film "Maan Karate". He has written and sung the song "Ding Dong" for the movie "Jigarthanda", which was critically acclaimed. He has also written and sung the song "Neruppu Da" in Rajinikanth's film "Kabali". His other notable works includes movies such as "Demonte Colony" and "Trisha Illana Nayanthara".


title: Arunraja Kamaraj

text: Kamaraj was born in Parali near Kulithalai town in Tamil Nadu. Studied schoolings at Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Kulithalai and higher secondary schoolings at Bishop Heber Higher Secondary School, Trichy. He graduated from J. J. College of Engineering and Technology, Tiruchirappalli. One of his college mates was actor Sivakarthikeyan. He is an excellent cricketer, during his college days, he represented JJCET as an all-rounder and won many university trophies and cups, he is nicknamed as "Tikolo" by the teammates in reference to the Kenyan cricket captain Steve Tikolo. He worked as an assistant director in Nelson Dilipkumar's Kolamavu Kokila. Later, he went on to name a character in his movie Kanaa after Nelson Dilipkumar which was played by Sivakarthikeyan. He was married to Sindhuja Kamaraj who died of Covid in 2021.


title: Vanity Fair (2004 film)

text: Vanity Fair is a 2004 historical drama film directed by Mira Nair and adapted from William Makepeace Thackeray's 1848 novel of the same name. The novel has been the subject of numerous television and film adaptations. Nair's version made notable changes in the development of main character Becky Sharp, played by Reese Witherspoon.


title: Vanity Fair (2004 film)

text: The film received several awards and nominations, including being nominated for the Golden Lion at the 2004 Venice Film Festival.


title: Vanity Fair (2004 film)

text: In 1802 UK, Becky Sharp, orphaned daughter of a poor painter, has finished her studies and offered to be governess to Sir Pitt Crawley's daughters. Before starting, she travels to London with her close friend Amelia Sedley and family. While there she begins a campaign to charm Amelia's awkward and overweight brother "Jos" Sedley, a wealthy trader living in India. Smitten with Becky, he almost proposes, but is dissuaded by Amelia's snobbish fiancé George Osborne, reminding him that Becky has no dowry.


title: Vanity Fair (2004 film)

text: Not finding a rich husband, Becky takes up her post. Horrified by the house and her employer Sir Pitt, she diligently teaches his daughters and prepares the house for his half-sister Miss Crawley. His youngest son, Rawdon Crawley, an army captain, comes with them and immediately fancies Becky. She manages to secure a post with ill-tempered Miss Crawley.


title: Vanity Fair (2004 film)

text: Meanwhile, Amelia's prospective father-in-law, Mr. Osborne, is trying to arrange a more advantageous marriage for his son George. When George refuses to consider her, Mr. Osborne bankrupts Mr. Sedley, forcing George to break his engagement to Amelia. She now lives in squalor with her family, but hopeful he will come for her, believing the gift of a piano from George's friend Dobbin is from George himself.


title: Vanity Fair (2004 film)

text: Rawdon Crawley and Becky marry secretly, but Miss Crawley soon finds out expelling her from her house and disinheriting Rawdon. George Osborne marries Amelia, rebelling against his father, and is soon after deployed with Dobbin and Rawdon to Belgium, as Napoleon escaped Elba and returned to France. Becky and Amelia accompany their husbands. The newly-wedded Osborne tires of Amelia, and hits on Becky. The ball they are attending is interrupted by an announcement that Napoleon has attacked, and they must march in three hours. Before leaving, Rawdon gives Becky all he's won at cards. The next day, as she tries to flee the city, she sees Amelia in the mob and leaves her carriage to be with her in Brussels, waiting out the battle.


title: Vanity Fair (2004 film)

text: In the ensuing Battle of Waterloo, George is killed and Rawdon survives. Amelia bears his son, also named George. Mr. Osborne refuses to acknowledge his grandson, so Amelia returns to live in poverty with her parents. Now-Major William Dobbin, young George's godfather, continues to show his love for the widowed Amelia by small kindnesses. She is too in love with George's memory to return Dobbin's affections. Saddened, he transfers to an army post in India. Meanwhile, Becky's son is also named after his father.


title: Vanity Fair (2004 film)

text: Several years pass. Rawdon has been passed over for inheritance by both his aunt and father, and they are sinking deep into debt. Amelia struggles to raise her son and reluctantly gives him up to be raised by his grandfather Mr. Osborne, for a fine education and lifestyle. Bailiffs arrive to repossess the Crawleys' furniture, but Becky is saved by their neighbor Lord Steyne, who she remembers from the past as a keen buyer of her father's paintings. He becomes her patron, giving her money and introducing her into London high society.


title: Vanity Fair (2004 film)

text: On the night of her triumphant presentation to King George IV, Becky receives word that Rawdon has been arrested and thrown into debtors' prison. Lord Steyne insists she spend the night with him in return for the services he has rendered her, and Rawdon, after being bailed out by his sister-in-law, walks in on Steyne forcing himself upon Becky. He throws him out, but realizes Becky has been taking money for months in secret without sharing with him. He leaves her, entrusting the care of their son to his older brother, the new Sir Pitt and his wife.


title: Vanity Fair (2004 film)

text: Twelve years later, Becky is a card dealer at a casino in Baden-Baden, Germany. Rawdon died from malaria soon after leaving her, while posted to a tropical island by Lord Steyne. She comes across Amelia's grown son George Jr., who invites her to tea with his mother. Mr. Osborne finally accepted Amelia, leaving her and George Jr. a large inheritance. Becky confronts Amelia over her obsession with the late George, showing her a love note from him to her many years earlier. She urges Amelia to love Dobbin, who has been loyal for many years. Although at first angered, Amelia realizes her mistake and declares her love to Dobbin.


title: Vanity Fair (2004 film)

text: Alone again in the casino, Becky meets Jos Sedley, who has come to Germany after Amelia told him Becky was there. He invites her to come and live in India with him, and she delightedly accepts. They depart to make a new life for themselves.


title: Vanity Fair (2004 film)

text: The film adaptation of "Vanity Fair" had been in development for over 10 years, with writers Matthew Faulk and Mark Skeet working on the screenplay. Mira Nair became attached to the project in 2002 and scrapped most of the initial screenplay. She brought Julian Fellowes in to rewrite the film; he agreed with her that the character of Becky Sharp should be made more sympathetic than in the novel. The ending was also changed, with Becky journeying to India with Joseph Sedley. The film had a budget of $23 million and originally was supposed to be in pre-production for 18 weeks. However, Reese Witherspoon became pregnant so it was necessary to speed up both pre-production and filming. "Vanity Fair" was shot in Bath, Kent, the Chatham Dockyard, and at Stanway House in Gloucestershire.


title: Vanity Fair (2004 film)

text: Robert Pattinson initially had a small but important role as the grown up son of Becky Sharp. He later revealed that he discovered his scenes were cut during the premiere screening.


title: Vanity Fair (2004 film)

text: Critics gave the film mixed reviews. On review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds an approval rating of 51% based on 167 reviews, and an average rating of 5.8/10. The website's critical consensus reads, "A more likable Becky Sharp makes for a less interesting movie." On Metacritic, the film has a weighted average score of 53 out of 100, based on 41 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews".


title: Vanity Fair (2004 film)

text: Stephen Hunter of "The Washington Post" gave a positive review, calling the movie "Mira Nair's fine movie version of the 1848 book, in all its glory and scope and wit." In the "Charlotte Observer", Lawrence Toppman commented that "The filmmakers have wisely retained the main structure of the book" and that "The cast is uniformly good, even when dealing with sudden mood changes forced by the screenwriters' need to move forward." Meanwhile, Lisa Schwarzbaum, in her review in "Entertainment Weekly", rated the film a B−, and added that "The dismaying switcheroo in director Mira Nair’s adaptation ... that Botoxes Thackeray’s riotous, unruly masterpiece, is that this "Vanity Fair" is, indeed, genteel and inoffensive. In fact, it borders on perky – a duller, safer tonal choice for the story of a conniving go-getter whose fall is as precipitous as her rise."


title: Vanity Fair (2004 film)

text: Mira Nair, the director of the film, searched for good Indian musicians to compose a song for the album, and finally selected the trio Shankar-Ehsaan-Loy at the last minute. She showed them a rough footage of the situation she wanted them to compose for, which was the last few sequences of the film. The trio used tabla and several other Indian musical instruments for the song, without any synth, to give it an ethnic feel. The song was sung by Shankar, accompanied by Richa Sharma and Jerry McCulley of "Celtic Instruments" described the song as "a sprightly duet", while "SoundtrackNet" said the "aforementioned upbeat vocal number "Gori Re"" is enjoyable in its own way for one who enjoys Indian musical styles.


title: The Trashmen

text: The original line-up of the group featured guitarists Tony Andreason and Dal Winslow, bassist Bob Reed, and drummer Steve Wahrer.


title: The Trashmen

text: Along with Colorado-based contemporaries the Astronauts, the Trashmen have been described as "the premier landlocked Midwestern surf group of the '60s." The band took their name from "Trashman's Blues", a song written and recorded in 1961 by Minneapolis musician Kai Ray (Richard Caire, 1935–2017), who later wrote songs for the band.


title: The Trashmen

text: Tony Andreason and Mike Jann were friends who learned and played guitar together, starting in 1955. They primarily played country. In 1957, at the Crystal Coliseum, Tony and Mike met Steve Wahrer, a drummer, Dallas "Dal" Winslow, a guitar player, and a saxophone player. Tony, Steve, Dal, and the saxophone player played as The String Kings for a brief time period. Mike wasn't part of the group, due to being more interested in country music. Tony met Jim Thaxter through Steve and Dale. Jim was a singer who was looking to front a band. "Jim Thaxter and the Travelers" was then formed with the following line-up: Jim Thaxter on lead vocals and guitar (tuned to a bass guitar); Tony Andreason on lead guitar; Dal Winslow on rhythm guitar; Tom Diehl on piano; and Steve Wahrer on drums. In Spring 1961, the group took a break as Tony and Jim had to go into the military. In February or March 1962, the two returned. However, disagreements on musical direction between the two caused Tony to leave the band. Steve and Dal left with him.


title: The Trashmen

text: Don Woody joined the group on bass. After Don's friend showed the group a record called "The Trashmen’s Blues" by guitarist Tony Caire aka Kai Ray, Steve decided to call the band "The Trashmen". The group was primarily an instrumental group, with occasional lead vocals by Steve. Steve began to sing more and more. Tony has occasionally sung lead. Don left the band and was replaced by Bob Reed, picked from an audition. The group gained an interest in surf rock after listening to Dick Dale. A song called "Surfin' Bird" was conceptualized by Steve and was instantly liked by their audience at shows.


title: The Trashmen

text: The Trashmen's biggest hit was 1963's "Surfin' Bird", which reached No. 4 on the "Billboard" Hot 100 in the latter part of that year. The song was a combination of two R&B hits by The Rivingtons, "The Bird's the Word" and "Papa-Oom-Mow-Mow". Early pressings of the single credit the Trashmen's drummer and vocalist Steve Wahrer as the composer, but following a threat from The Rivingtons' legal counsel, the writing credit was removed from Wahrer and transferred to the members of The Rivingtons.


title: The Trashmen

text: The song was later covered by The Ramones, The Cramps, Silverchair, The Psychotic Petunias, Pee-wee Herman, Equipe 84, and the thrash metal band Sodom. It has also been featured in several films, including "Full Metal Jacket", "Fred Claus", "Pink Flamingos", "Back to the Beach", and "The Big Year".


title: The Trashmen

text: "Surfin' Bird" was the subject of the episode "I Dream of Jesus" of the television series "Family Guy", sending the song to No. 8 on the iTunes Top 10 Rock songs chart and No. 50 on the UK Singles Chart in 2009. It has since become a running gag on the show.


title: The Trashmen

text: In 2010, a Facebook campaign was launched to send the song to No. 1 in the UK over the Christmas season; this was largely intended (as with Rage Against the Machine's "Killing in the Name", in 2009) as a protest against the takeover of the Christmas No. 1 spot by "The X Factor" winner's song. The track debuted in the UK Top Ten for the first time on December 19, at No. 3.


title: The Trashmen

text: Beyond "Surfin' Bird", The Trashmen experienced limited success. In 1964, "Bird Dance Beat" reached No. 30 on the "Billboard" Hot 100 in the United States and was a top 10 hit in Canada. The group disbanded in 1967. A four-CD box set of their work was released by Sundazed Records.


title: The Trashmen

text: The group made sporadic reunions in the 1970s and 1980s, performing together until Steve Wahrer died of throat cancer in 1989. Later, Tony Andreason's brother Mark replaced Wahrer as drummer. Reed's son Robin joined as a touring member in 2009 on drums, filling in for Mark Andreason.


title: The Trashmen

text: In 1999, the Trashmen played at the Las Vegas Grind. They also performed in Illinois, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Spain in 2007 and 2008.


title: The Trashmen

text: The Trashmen toured Europe in 2008 and in 2010, performing in Germany, the Netherlands, France, Spain, Belgium, Italy, Austria, Norway, Sweden, and Finland.


title: The Trashmen

text: The band recorded four tracks at Custom Recording Studios in Golden Valley, Minnesota, with longtime fan and guitarist Deke Dickerson, for the record label Major Label, releasing the 7" EP "I'm a Trashman" in March 2013. A full-length follow-up LP, "Bringing Back the Trash", was released in April 2014. After several 2015 shows in the band's hometown of Minneapolis, the band re-entered retirement.


title: Late Roman army

text: In modern scholarship, the "late" period of the Roman army begins with the accession of the Emperor Diocletian in AD 284, and ends in 480 with the death of Julius Nepos, being roughly coterminous with the Dominate. During the period 395–476, the army of the Roman Empire's western half progressively disintegrated, while its counterpart in the East, known as the East Roman army (or the early Byzantine army) remained largely intact in size and structure until the reign of Justinian I (r. AD 527–565).


title: Late Roman army

text: The Imperial Roman army of the Principate (30 BC – 284 AD) underwent a significant transformation as a result of the chaotic 3rd century. Unlike the army of the Principate, the army of the 4th century was heavily dependent on conscription and its soldiers were paid much less than in the 2nd century. Barbarians from outside the empire probably supplied a much larger proportion of the late army's recruits than in the army of the 1st and 2nd centuries, but there is little evidence that this adversely affected the army's combat performance.


title: Late Roman army

text: Scholarly estimates of the size of the 4th-century army diverge widely, ranging from ca. 400,000 to over one million effectives (i.e. from roughly the same size as the 2nd-century army to 2 or 3 times larger). This is due to fragmentary evidence, unlike the much better-documented 2nd-century army.


title: Late Roman army

text: Under the Tetrarchy, military commands were separated from administrative governorships for the first time, in contrast to the Principate, where provincial governors were also commanders-in-chief of all military forces deployed in their provinces.


title: Late Roman army

text: The main change in structure from the 2nd-century army was the establishment of large escort armies ("comitatus praesentales"), typically containing 20,000–30,000 top-grade palatini troops. These were normally based near the imperial capitals: (Constantinople in the East, Milan in the West), thus far from the empire's borders. These armies' primary function was to deter usurpers, and they usually campaigned under the personal command of their emperors. The legions were split into smaller units comparable in size to the auxiliary regiments of the Principate. Infantry adopted the more protective equipment of the Principate cavalry.


title: Late Roman army

text: The role of cavalry in the late army does not appear to have been greatly enhanced as compared with the army of the Principate. The evidence is that cavalry was much the same proportion of overall army numbers as in the 2nd century and that its tactical role and prestige remained similar. However, the cavalry of the Late Roman army was endowed with greater numbers of specialised units, such as extra-heavy shock cavalry (cataphractii and clibanarii) and mounted archers. During the later 4th century, the cavalry acquired a reputation for incompetence and cowardice for their role in three major battles. In contrast, the infantry retained its traditional reputation for excellence.


title: Late Roman army

text: The 3rd and 4th centuries saw the upgrading of many existing border forts to make them more defensible, as well as the construction of new forts with stronger defenses. The interpretation of this trend has fuelled an ongoing debate whether the army adopted a defence-in-depth strategy or continued the same posture of "forward defence" as in the early Principate. Many elements of the late army's defence posture were similar to those associated with forward defence, such as forward location of forts, frequent cross-border operations, and external buffer-zones of allied barbarian tribes. Whatever the defence strategy, it was apparently less successful in preventing barbarian incursions than in the 1st and 2nd centuries. This may have been due to heavier barbarian pressure, or to the practice of keeping large armies of the best troops in the interior, depriving the border forces of sufficient support.


title: Late Roman army

text: Much of our evidence for 4th century army unit deployments is contained in a single document, the "Notitia Dignitatum", compiled c. 395–420, a manual of all late Roman public offices, military and civil. The main deficiency with the "Notitia" is that it lacks any personnel figures, so as to render estimates of army size impossible. Also, it was compiled at the very end of the 4th century; it is thus difficult to reconstruct the position earlier. However, the "Notitia" remains the central source on the late Army's structure due to the dearth of other evidence. The "Notitia" also suffers from significant "lacunae" and numerous errors accumulated from centuries of copying.


title: Late Roman army

text: The main literary sources for the 4th-century army are the "Res Gestae" (History) of Ammianus Marcellinus, whose surviving books cover the period 353 to 378. Marcellinus, himself a veteran soldier, is regarded by scholars as a reliable and valuable source, but he largely fails to remedy the deficiencies of the "Notitia" as regards army and unit strength or units in existence, as he is rarely specific about either. The third major source for the late army is the corpus of imperial decrees published in the East Roman empire in the 5th and 6th centuries: the Theodosian code (438) and the "Corpus Juris Civilis" (528–39). These compilations of Roman laws dating from the 4th century contain numerous imperial decrees relating to all aspects of the regulation and administration of the late army.


title: Late Roman army

text: "De re militari" is a treatise on Roman military affairs by Vegetius, a late 4th or early 5th-century writer, and contains considerable information on the late army, although its focus is on the army of the Republic and Principate. However, Vegetius (who wholly lacked military experience) is often unreliable. For example, he stated that the army abandoned armour and helmets in the later 4th century (offering the absurd explanation that this equipment was too heavy), which is contradicted by sculptural and artistic evidence. In general, it is not safe to accept a statement from Vegetius unless it is corroborated by other evidence.


title: Late Roman army

text: Scholars of the late army have to contend with a dramatic diminution of the epigraphic record in the 3rd and 4th centuries, compared with the 1st and 2nd centuries. Diplomas were no longer issued to retiring auxiliaries after 203 (most likely because almost all were already Roman citizens by then). In addition, there was a huge reduction in the number of tombstones, altars and other dedications by Roman servicemen. Official stamps of military units on building materials (e.g., tiles) are much rarer, but this trend should probably not be seen as indicating a decline in the army's administrative sophistication. Papyrus evidence from Egypt shows that military units continued to keep detailed written records in the 4th century (the vast bulk of which are lost due to organic decomposition). Most likely, the decline in inscriptions is due to changing fashion, in part influenced by the increase in barbarian recruits and the rise of Christianity. The dearth of inscriptions leaves major gaps in our understanding of the late army and renders many conclusions tentative.


title: Late Roman army

text: The seminal modern study of the late army is contained in "The Later Roman Empire, 284-602" (LRE) by the "high priest" of late Roman studies, A.H.M. Jones. Because of its wealth of detail and documentary references, this 1964 publication remains an essential tool for all scholars of the period. However, its primary weakness is its age, for a considerable amount of archaeological work and other relevant scholarship has transpired in the decades since its publication.


title: Late Roman army

text: The regular army of the Principate was established by the founder–emperor Augustus (ruled 30 BC – 14 AD) and survived until the end of the 3rd century. The regular army consisted of two distinct corps, both being made up of mainly volunteer professionals.


title: Late Roman army

text: The elite legions were large infantry formations, varying between 25 and 33 in number, of c. 5,500 men each (all infantry save a small cavalry arm of 120) which admitted only Roman citizens. The "auxilia" consisted of around 400 much smaller units of c. 500 men each (a minority were up to 1,000 strong), which were divided into approximately 100 cavalry "alae", 100 infantry "cohortes" and 200 mixed cavalry/infantry units or "cohortes equitatae". Some auxilia regiments were designated "sagittariorum", meaning that they specialised in archery. The "auxilia" thus contained almost all the Roman army's cavalry and archers, as well as (from the late 1st century onwards) approximately the same number of foot soldiers as the legions. The "auxilia" were mainly recruited from the "peregrini": provincial subjects of the empire who did not hold Roman citizenship, but the "auxilia" also admitted Roman citizens and possibly "barbari", the Roman term for peoples living outside the empire's borders. At this time both legions and auxilia were almost all based in frontier provinces. The only substantial military force at the immediate disposal of the emperor was the elite Praetorian Guard of c. 10,000 men which was based in Rome.


title: Late Roman army

text: The senior officers of the army were, until the 3rd century, mainly from the Italian aristocracy. This was divided into two orders, the senatorial order ("ordo senatorius"), consisting of the c. 600 sitting members of the Roman Senate and their sons and grandsons, and the more numerous (several thousand-strong) "equites" or "knights".


title: Late Roman army

text: Hereditary senators and "equites" combined military service with civilian posts, a career path known as the "cursus honorum", typically starting with a period of junior administrative posts in Rome, followed by 5–10 years in the military and a final period of senior positions in either the provinces or Rome. This tiny, tightly-knit ruling oligarchy of under 10,000 men monopolised political, military and economic power in an empire of c. 80 million inhabitants and achieved a remarkable degree of political stability. During the first 200 years of its existence (30 BC – 180 AD), the empire suffered only one major episode of civil strife (the Civil War of 68–9). Otherwise, usurpation attempts by provincial governors were few and swiftly suppressed.


title: Late Roman army

text: As regards the military, members of the senatorial order ("senatorii") exclusively filled the following posts:


title: Late Roman army

text: By the late 1st century, a distinct equestrian group, non-Italian and military in character, became established. This was a result of the established custom whereby the emperor elevated the "primuspilus" (chief centurion) of each legion to equestrian rank on completion of his year in office. This resulted in some 30 career soldiers, mostly non-Italian and risen from the ranks, joining the aristocracy each year. Far less wealthy than their Italian counterparts, many such "equites" belonged to families that provided career soldiers for generations. Prominent among them were Romanised Illyrians, the descendants of the Illyrian-speaking tribes that inhabited the Roman provinces of Pannonia (W Hungary/Croatia/Slovenia), Dalmatia (Croatia/Bosnia) and Moesia Superior (Serbia), together with the neighbouring Thracians of Moesia Inferior (N Bulgaria) and Macedonia provinces. From the time of Domitian (81–96), when over half the Roman army was deployed in the Danubian regions, the Illyrian and Thracian provinces became the most important recruiting ground of the auxilia and later the legions.


title: Late Roman army

text: The seminal development for the army in the early 3rd century was the "Constitutio Antoniniana" (Antonine Decree) of 212, issued by Emperor Caracalla (211–217). This granted Roman citizenship to all free inhabitants of the empire, ending the second-class status of the "peregrini". This had the effect of breaking down the distinction between the citizen legions and the auxiliary regiments. In the 1st and 2nd centuries, the legions were the symbol (and guarantors) of the dominance of the Italian "master nation" over its subject peoples. In the 3rd century, they were no longer socially superior to their auxiliary counterparts (although they may have retained their elite status in military terms) and the legions' special armour and equipment ("e.g." the "lorica segmentata") was phased out.


title: Late Roman army

text: The traditional alternation between senior civilian and military posts fell into disuse in the 2nd and 3rd centuries, as the Italian hereditary aristocracy was progressively replaced in the senior echelons of the army by the "primipilares" (former chief centurions). In the 3rd century, only 10% of auxiliary prefects whose origins are known were Italian equestrians, compared to the majority in the previous two centuries. At the same time, equestrians increasingly replaced the senatorial order in the top commands. Septimius Severus (193–211) placed equestrian "primipilares" in command of the three new legions he raised and Gallienus (260–268) did the same for all the other legions, giving them the title "praefectus pro legato" ("prefect acting as legate"). The rise of the "primipilares" may have provided the army with more professional leadership, but it increased military rebellions by ambitious generals. The 3rd century saw numerous "coup d'état" and civil wars. Few 3rd-century emperors enjoyed long reigns or died of natural causes.


title: Late Roman army

text: Emperors responded to the increased insecurity with a steady build-up of the forces at their immediate disposal. These became known as the "comitatus" ("escort", from which derives the English word "committee"). To the Praetorian Guard's 10,000 men, Septimius Severus added the legion "II Parthica". Based at Albano Laziale near Rome, it was the first legion to be stationed in Italy since Augustus. He doubled the size of the imperial escort cavalry, the "equites singulares Augusti", to 2,000 by drawing select detachments from "alae" on the borders. His "comitatus" thus numbered some 17,000 men, equivalent to 31 infantry "cohortes" and 11 "alae" of cavalry. The trend for the emperor to gather round his person ever greater forces reached its peak in the 4th century under Constantine I the Great (306–337) whose "comitatus" may have reached 100,000 men, perhaps a quarter of the army's total effective strength.


title: Late Roman army

text: The rule of Gallienus saw the appointment of a senior officer, with the title of "dux" (plural form: "duces", the origin of the medieval noble rank of duke), to command all the "comitatus" cavalry. This force included "equites promoti" (cavalry contingents detached from the legions), plus Illyrian light cavalry ("equites Dalmatarum") and allied barbarian cavalry ("equites foederati"). Under Constantine I, the head of the "comitatus" cavalry was given the title of "magister equitum" ("master of horse"), which in Republican times had been held by the deputy to a Roman dictator. But neither title implies the existence of an independent "cavalry army", as was suggested by some more dated scholars. The cavalry under both officers were integral to mixed infantry and cavalry "comitatus", with the infantry remaining the predominant element.


title: Late Roman army

text: The 3rd century saw a progressive reduction in the size of the legions and even some auxiliary units. Legions were broken up into smaller units, as evidenced by the shrinkage and eventual abandonment of their traditional large bases, documented for example in Britain. In addition, from the 2nd century onwards, the separation of some detachments from their parent units became permanent in some cases, establishing new unit types, e.g. the "vexillatio equitum Illyricorum" based in Dacia in the early 2nd century and the "equites promoti" and "numerus Hnaufridi" in Britain. This led to the proliferation of unit types in the 4th century, generally of smaller size than those of the Principate. For example, in the 2nd century, a "vexillatio" (from "vexillum" = "standard") was any detachment from a legion or auxiliary regiment, either cavalry or infantry. In the 4th century, it denoted an elite cavalry regiment.


title: Late Roman army

text: From the 3rd century are the first records of a small number of regular units bearing the names of barbarian tribes (as opposed to "peregrini" tribal names). These were "foederati" (allied troops under a military obligation to Rome) converted into regular units, a trend that was to accelerate in the 4th century. The "ala I Sarmatarum", based in Britain, was probably composed of some of the 5,500 captured Sarmatian horsemen sent to garrison Hadrian's Wall by emperor Marcus Aurelius in c. 175. There is no evidence of irregular barbarian units becoming part of the regular army of the Principate until the 3rd century.


title: Late Roman army

text: The mid-3rd century saw the empire plunged into a military and economic crisis which almost resulted in its disintegration. It consisted of a series of military catastrophes in 251–271 when Gaul, the Alpine regions and Italy, the Balkans and the East were overrun by Alamanni, Sarmatians, Goths and Persians. At the same time, the Roman army was struggling with the effects of a devastating pandemic, now thought to have been smallpox, the Plague of Cyprian which began in 251 and was still raging in 270, when it claimed the life of Emperor Claudius II Gothicus (268–270). The evidence for the earlier Antonine pandemic of the late 2nd century, probably also smallpox, indicates a mortality of 15–30% in the empire as a whole. Zosimus describes the Cyprianic outbreak as even worse. The armies and, by extension, the frontier provinces where they were based (and mainly recruited), would likely have suffered deaths at the top end of the range, due to their close concentration of individuals and frequent movements across the empire.


title: Late Roman army

text: The 3rd-century crisis started a chain-reaction of socio-economic effects that proved decisive for the development of the late army. The combination of barbarian devastation and reduced tax-base due to plague bankrupted the imperial government, which resorted to issuing ever more debased coin e.g. the "antoninianus", the silver coin used to pay the troops in this period, lost 95% of its silver content between its launch in 215 and its demise in the 260s. Thus, twenty times more money could be distributed with the same amount of precious metal. This led to rampant price inflation: for example, the price of wheat under Diocletian was 67 times the typical price under the Principate. The monetary economy collapsed and the army was obliged to rely on unpaid food levies to obtain supplies. Food levies were raised without regard to fairness, ruining the border provinces where the military was mainly based. Soldiers' salaries became worthless, which reduced the army's recruits to a subsistence-level existence. This in turn discouraged volunteers and forced the government to rely on conscription and large-scale recruitment of barbarians into the regular army because of the shortfalls caused by the plague. By the mid-4th century, barbarian-born men probably accounted for about a quarter of all recruits (and over a third in elite regiments), likely a far higher share than in the 1st and 2nd centuries.


title: Late Roman army

text: By the 3rd century, Romanised Illyrians and Thracians, mostly "primipilares" and their descendants, came to dominate the army's senior officer echelons. Finally, the Danubian officer-class seized control of the state itself. In 268, the emperor Gallienus (ruled 260–68) was overthrown by a "coup d'état" organised by a clique of Danubian senior officers, including his successors Claudius II Gothicus and Aurelian (270–75). They and their successors Probus (276–82) and Diocletian (ruled 284–305) and his colleagues in the Tetrarchy formed a sort of self-perpetuating military junta of Danubian officers who were born in the same provinces (several in the same city, Sirmium, a major legionary base in Moesia Superior) and/or had served in the same regiments.


title: Late Roman army

text: The Junta reversed the military disasters of 251–71 with a string of victories, most notably the defeat at Naissus of a vast Gothic army by Claudius II, which was so crushing that the Goths did not seriously threaten the empire again until a century later at Adrianople (378).


title: Late Roman army

text: The Illyrian emperors or Danubian emperors were especially concerned with the depopulation of the border provinces due to plague and barbarian invasions during the Crisis. The problem was especially acute in their own Danubian home provinces, where much arable land had fallen out of cultivation through lack of manpower. The depopulation was thus a serious threat to army recruitment and supply. In response, the Danubian Junta pursued an aggressive policy of resettling defeated barbarian tribesmen on imperial territory on a massive scale. Aurelian moved a large number of Carpi to Pannonia in 272. (In addition, by 275 he evacuated the province of Dacia, removing the entire provincial population to Moesia, an act largely motivated by the same problem). His successor Probus is recorded as transferring 100,000 Bastarnae to Moesia in 279/80 and later equivalent numbers of Gepids, Goths and Sarmatians. Diocletian continued the policy, transferring in 297 huge numbers of Bastarnae, Sarmatians and Carpi (the entire latter tribe, according to Victor). Although the precise terms under which these people were settled in the empire are unknown (and may have varied), the common feature was the grant of land in return for an obligation of military service much heavier than the normal conscription quota. The policy had the triple benefit, from the Roman government's point of view, of weakening the hostile tribe, repopulating the plague-ravaged frontier provinces (and bringing their abandoned fields back into cultivation) and providing a pool of first-rate recruits for the army. But it could also be popular with the barbarian prisoners, who were often delighted by the prospect of a land grant within the empire. In the 4th century, such communities were known as "laeti".


title: Late Roman army

text: The Danubian emperors ruled the empire for over a century, until 379. Indeed, until 363, power was held by descendants of one of the original Junta members. Constantine I' s father, Constantius Chlorus, was a "Caesar" (deputy emperor) in Diocletian's Tetrarchy. Constantine's grandson Julian ruled until 363. These emperors restored the army to its former strength and effectiveness, but were solely concerned with the needs and interests of the military. They were also divorced from the wealthy Roman senatorial families that dominated the Senate and owned much of the empire's land. This in turn bred a feeling of alienation from the army among the Roman aristocracy which in the later 4th century began to resist the military's exorbitant demands for recruits and supplies.


title: Late Roman army

text: Diocletian made wide-ranging administrative, economic and military reforms that were aimed at providing the military with adequate manpower, supplies and military infrastructure. In the words of one historian, "Diocletian ... turned the entire empire into a regimented logistic base" (to supply the army).


title: Late Roman army

text: Diocletian's administrative reforms had the twin aims of ensuring political stability and providing the bureaucratic infrastructure needed to raise the recruits and supplies needed by the army. At the top, Diocletian instituted the Tetrarchy. This divided the empire into two halves, East and West, each to be ruled by an "Augustus" (emperor). Each "Augustus" would in turn appoint a deputy called a "Caesar", who would act both as his ruling partner (each Caesar was assigned a quarter of the empire) and designated successor. This four-man team would thus have the flexibility to deal with multiple and simultaneous challenges as well as providing for a legitimate succession. The latter failed in its central aim, to prevent the disastrous civil wars caused by the multiple usurpations of the 3rd century. Indeed, the situation may have been made worse, by providing each pretender with a substantial "comitatus" to enforce his claim. Diocletian himself lived (in retirement) to see his successors fight each other for power. But the division of the empire into Eastern and Western halves, recognising both geographical and cultural realities, proved enduring: it was mostly retained during the 4th century and became permanent after 395.


title: Late Roman army

text: Diocletian reformed the provincial administration, establishing a three-tiered provincial hierarchy, in place of the previous single-tier structure. The original 42 provinces of the Principate were almost tripled in number to c. 120. These were grouped into 12 divisions called dioceses, each under a "vicarius", in turn grouped into 4 praetorian prefectures, to correspond to the areas of command assigned to the four Tetrarchs, who were each assisted by a chief-of-staff called a "praefectus praetorio" (not be confused with the commanders of the Praetorian Guard, who held the same title). The aim of this fragmentation of provincial administration was probably to reduce the possibility of military rebellion by governors (by reducing the forces they each controlled).


title: Late Roman army

text: Also to this end, and to provide more professional military leadership, Diocletian separated military from civil command at the lowest, provincial level. Governors of provinces on the frontiers were stripped of command of the troops stationed there in favour of purely military officers called "duces limitis" ("border commanders"). Some 20 "duces" may have been created under Diocletian. Most "duces" were given command of forces in a single province, but a few controlled more than one province e.g. the "dux Pannoniae I et Norici". However, at higher echelons, military and administrative command remained united in the "vicarii" and "praefecti praetorio". In addition, Diocletian completed the exclusion of the senatorial class, still dominated by the Italian aristocracy, from all senior military commands and from all top administrative posts except in Italy.


title: Late Roman army

text: To ensure the army received sufficient recruits, Diocletian appears to have instituted systematic annual conscription of Roman citizens for the first time since the days of the Roman Republic. In addition, he was probably responsible for the decree, first recorded in 313, compelling the sons of serving soldiers and veterans to enlist.


title: Late Roman army

text: Under Diocletian, the number of legions, and probably of other units, more than doubled. But it is unlikely that overall army size increased nearly as much, since unit strengths appear to have been reduced, in some cases drastically e.g. new legions raised by Diocletian appear to have numbered just 1,000 men, compared to the establishment of c. 5,500 in the Principate i.e. the new legions may have increased overall legionary numbers by only c. 15%. Even so, scholars generally agree that Diocletian increased army numbers substantially, by at least 33%.


title: Late Roman army

text: Diocletian's primary concern was to place the provision of food supplies to the army on a rational and sustainable basis. To this end, the emperor put an end to the arbitrary exaction of food levies ("indictiones") for the army, whose burden fell mainly on border provinces and which had ruined them economically. He instituted a system of regular annual "indictiones" ("tax levies") with the tax demanded set in advance for 5 years and related to the amount of cultivated land in each province, backed by a thorough empire-wide census of land, peasants and livestock. To deal with the problem of rural depopulation in some areas (and consequent loss of food production), he decreed that peasants, who had always been free to leave their land during the Principate, must never leave the locality in which they were registered by the census (legal term is 'origo'). This measure had the effect of legally tying tenant farmers ("coloni") and their descendants to their landlords' estates.


title: Late Roman army

text: In parallel with restoring the size of the army, Diocletian's efforts and resources were focused on a massive upgrading of the defensive infrastructure along all the empire's borders, including new forts and strategic military roads.


title: Late Roman army

text: After defeating Maxentius in 312, Constantine disbanded the Praetorian Guard, ending the latter's 300-year existence. Although the instant reason was the Guard's support for his rival Maxentius, a force based in Rome had also become obsolete since emperors now rarely resided there. The imperial escort role of the Guard's cavalry, the "equites singulares Augusti", was now fulfilled by the "scholae". These elite cavalry regiments existed by the time of Constantine and may have been founded by Diocletian.


title: Late Roman army

text: Constantine expanded his "comitatus" into a major and permanent force. This was achieved by the addition of units withdrawn from the frontier provinces and by creating new units: more cavalry "vexillationes" and new-style infantry units called "auxilia". The expanded "comitatus" was now placed under the command of two new officers, a "magister peditum" to command the infantry and "magister equitum" for cavalry. "Comitatus" troops were now formally denoted "comitatenses" to distinguish them from the frontier forces ("limitanei"). The size of the Constantinian "comitatus" is uncertain. But Constantine mobilised 98,000 troops for his war against Maxentius, according to Zosimus. It is likely that most of these were retained for his "comitatus". This represented about a quarter of the total regular forces, if one accepts that the Constantinian army numbered around 400,000. The rationale for such a large "comitatus" has been debated among scholars. A traditional view sees the "comitatus" as a strategic reserve which could be deployed against major barbarian invasions that succeeded in penetrating deep into the empire or as the core of large expeditionary forces sent across the borders. But more recent scholarship has viewed its primary function as insurance against potential usurpers. (See Strategy of the Late Roman army below).


title: Late Roman army

text: Constantine I completed the separation of military commands from the administrative structure. The "vicarii" and "praefecti praetorio" lost their field commands and became purely administrative officials. However, they retained a central role in military affairs, as they remained responsible for military recruitment, pay and, above all, supply. It is unclear whether the "duces" on the border now reported direct to the emperor, or to one of the two "magistri" of the "comitatus".


title: Late Roman army

text: In addition, Constantine appears to have reorganised the border forces along the Danube, replacing the old-style "alae" and "cohortes" with new units of "cunei" (cavalry) and "auxilia" (infantry) respectively. It is unclear how the new-style units differed from the old-style ones, but those stationed on the border (as opposed to those in the "comitatus") may have been smaller, perhaps half the size. In sectors other than the Danube, old-style auxiliary regiments survived.


title: Late Roman army

text: The 5th-century historian Zosimus strongly criticised the establishment of the large "comitatus", accusing Constantine of wrecking his predecessor Diocletian's work of strengthening the border defences: "By the foresight of Diocletian, the frontiers of the Roman empire were everywhere studded with cities and forts and towers... and the whole army was stationed along them, so it was impossible for the barbarians to break through... But Constantine ruined this defensive system by withdrawing the majority of the troops from the frontiers and stationing them in cities which did not require protection." Zosimus' critique is probably excessive, both because the "comitatus" already existed in Diocletian's time and because some new regiments were raised by Constantine for his expanded "comitatus", as well as incorporating existing units. Nevertheless, the majority of his "comitatus" was drawn from existing frontier units. This drawdown of large numbers of the best units inevitably increased the risk of successful large-scale barbarian breaches of the frontier defences.


title: Late Roman army

text: On Constantine's death in 337, his three sons Constantine II, Constans and Constantius II, divided the empire between them, ruling the West (Gaul, Britain and Spain), the Centre (Italy, Africa and the Balkans), and the East respectively. They also each received a share of their father's "comitatus". By 353, when only Constantius survived, it appears that the 3 "comitatus" had become permanently based in these regions, one each in Gaul, Illyricum and the East. By the 360s, the border "duces" reported to their regional "comitatus" commander. However, in addition to the regional "comitatus", Constantius retained a force that accompanied him everywhere, which was from then called a "comitatus praesentalis" (imperial escort army). The three regional armies became steadily more numerous until, by the time of the "Notitia" (c. 400), there were 6 in the West and 3 in the East. These corresponded to the border dioceses of, in the West: Britannia, Tres Galliae, Illyricum (West), Africa and Hispaniae; and in the East: Illyricum (East), Thraciae and Oriens, respectively. Thus, the regional "comitatus" commander had become the military counterpart of the diocesan administrative head, the "vicarius", in control of all military forces in the diocese, including the "duces". At this point, therefore, the parallel military/civil administrative structure may be summarised as follows:


title: Late Roman army

text: The evolution of regional "comitatus" was a partial reversal of Constantine's policy and, in effect, a vindication of Zosimus' critique that the "limitanei" had been left with insufficient support.


title: Late Roman army

text: Despite the proliferation of regional "comitatus", the imperial escort armies remained in existence, and in the period of the "Notitia" (c. 400) three "comitatus praesentales", each 20–30,000 strong, still contained a total of "c." 75,000 men. If one accepts that the army at the time numbered about 350,000 men, the escort armies still contained 20–25% of the total effectives. Regiments which remained with the escort armies were, not later than 365, denoted "palatini" (lit. "of the palace", from "palatium"), a higher grade of "comitatenses". Regiments were now classified in four grades, which denoted quality, prestige and pay. These were, in descending order, "scholares", "palatini", "comitatenses" and "limitanei".


title: Late Roman army

text: Because of fairly detailed evidence, there is broad scholarly consensus among modern scholars regarding the size of the Roman Army in the 1st and 2nd centuries AD. However, this consensus breaks down regarding the size of the Army in the 4th century. Lack of evidence about unit-strengths has resulted in widely divergent estimates of the Late Army's strength, ranging from c. 400,000 (much the same as in the 2nd century) to well in excess of one million. However, mainstream scholarship is divided between a "low count" of c. 400,000 and a higher count of c. 600,000.


title: Late Roman army

text: The traditional view of scholars is that the 4th-century army was much larger than the 2nd-century army, in the region of double the size. The late 6th-century writer Agathias, gives a global total of 645,000 effectives for the army "in the old days", presumed to mean at its peak under Constantine I. This figure probably includes fleets, leaving a total of c. 600,000 for the army alone. Figures in Zosimus for the armies of contending emperors (including Constantine's) in 312 add up to a similar total of 581,000 soldiers. A.H.M. Jones' "Later Roman Empire" (1964), which contains the fundamental study of the late Roman army, calculated a similar total of 600,000 (exc. fleets) by applying his own estimates of unit-strengths to the units listed in the "Notitia Dignitatum".


title: Late Roman army

text: However, Jones' figure of 600,000 is based on assumptions about "limitanei" unit strengths which may be too high. Jones calculated unit-strengths in Egypt under Diocletian using papyrus evidence of unit payrolls. But a rigorous reassessment of that evidence by R. Duncan-Jones concluded that Jones had overestimated unit sizes by 2–6 times. For example, Jones estimated legions on the frontiers at c. 3,000 men and other units at c. 500. But Duncan-Jones' revisions found frontier legions of around 500 men, an "ala" of just 160 and an "equites" unit of 80. Even allowing for the possibility that some of these units were detachments from larger units, it is likely that Diocletianic unit-strengths were far lower than earlier.


title: Late Roman army

text: More recently, Treadgold (1995) has endorsed the "Large Late Army" position in a detailed examination of the Byzantine army's strength (1995). Treadgold argues that John Lydus' figure of 389,704 soldiers represents the army's strength in 285, while Zosimus' figures totalling 581,000 soldiers account for the army in 312. Treadgold estimates that the army's size was roughly constant during the period 235-285, followed by a rapid increase of over 50% between 285-305, and again remained roughly constant 305-395.


title: Late Roman army

text: The traditional view of a much larger 4th century army has fallen out of favour with some historians in more recent times, as existing evidence has been reappraised and new evidence uncovered. The revisionist view is that the 4th-century army was, at its peak, roughly the same size as the 2nd-century one and considerably smaller in the late 4th century.


title: Late Roman army

text: At the same time, more recent work has suggested that the regular army of the 2nd century was considerably larger than the c. 300,000 traditionally assumed. This is because the 2nd-century auxilia were not just equal in numbers to the legions as in the early 1st century, but some 50% larger. The army of the Principate probably reached a peak of nearly 450,000 (excluding fleets and "foederati") at the end of the 2nd century. Furthermore, the evidence is that the actual strength of 2nd-century units was typically much closer to official (c. 85%) than 4th century units.


title: Late Roman army

text: The later 4th-century army contained three types of army group: (a) Imperial escort armies ("comitatus praesentales"). These were ordinarily based near the imperial capitals (Milan in the West, Constantinople in the East), but usually accompanied the emperors on campaign. (b) Diocesan field armies ("comitatus"). These were based in strategic regions, on or near the frontiers. (c) Border armies ("exercitus limitanei").


title: Late Roman army

text: Types (a) and (b) are both frequently defined as "mobile field armies". This is because, unlike the "limitanei" units, their operations were not confined to a single province. But their strategic role was quite different. The escort armies' primary role was probably to provide the emperor's ultimate insurance against usurpers: the very existence of such a powerful force would deter many potential rivals, and if it did not, the escort army alone was often sufficient to defeat them. Their secondary role was to accompany the emperor on major campaigns such as a foreign war or to repel a large barbarian invasion. The diocesan "comitatus", on the other hand, had the task of supporting the border forces of their diocese in major operations.


title: Late Roman army

text: The eastern section of the "Notitia" is dated to c. 395, at the death of Theodosius I. At this time, according to the "Notitia", in the East there were 2 imperial escort armies ("comitatus praesentales"), each commanded by a "magister militum praesentalis", the highest military rank, who reported direct to the emperor. These contained units of mainly "palatini" grade. In addition, there were 3 diocesan "comitatus", in East Illyricum, Thraciae and Oriens dioceses, consisting mostly of "comitatenses"-grade troops. Each was commanded by a "magister militum", who also reported direct to the emperor.


title: Late Roman army

text: The 13 eastern border "duces" reported to the "magister militum" of their diocese: (East) Illyricum (2 "duces"), Thraciae (2), Pontica (1), Oriens (6) and Aegyptum (2).


title: Late Roman army

text: The eastern structure as presented in the "Notitia" remained largely intact until the reign of Justinian I (525-65).


title: Late Roman army

text: The western section was completed considerably later than its eastern counterpart, c. 425, after the West had been overrun by Germanic peoples. However, it appears that the western section was several times revised, in the period c. 400-25: e.g. the dispositions for Britain must date from before 410, as that is when it is believed Roman forces withdrew from Britain definitively. This reflects the confusion of the times. Army dispositions of armies and commands were constantly changing to reflect the needs of the moment. The scale of the chaos in this period is illustrated by Heather's analysis of units in the army of the West. Of 181 "comitatus" regiments listed for 425, only 84 existed before 395; and many regiments in the "comitatus" were simply upgraded "limitanei" units, implying the destruction or disbandment of around 76 "comitatus" regiments during the period 395-425. By 460, the western army had largely disintegrated.


title: Late Roman army

text: In consequence, the West section of the "Notitia" does not accurately represent the western army structure as it stood in 395 (for which the eastern structure is probably a better guide).


title: Late Roman army

text: The western structure differs substantially from the eastern. In the West, after 395, the emperor was no longer in direct command of his diocesan "comitatus" chiefs, who instead reported to a military generalissimo (the late Roman equivalent to a pre-industrial-era Japanese "shōgun"). This anomalous structure had arisen through the ascendancy of the half–Vandal military strongman Stilicho (395–408), who was appointed by Theodosius I as guardian of his infant son, Honorius, who succeeded him in the West. After Stilicho's death in 408, a succession of weak emperors ensured that this position continued, under Stilicho's successors (especially Aetius and Ricimer), until the dissolution of the Western empire in 476. The generalissimo was generally known as the "magister utriusque militiae" (abbreviation: MVM, literally "master of both services", i.e. of both cavalry and infantry). This officer was in direct command of the single but large western imperial escort army based near Milan.


title: Late Roman army

text: Subordinate to the MVM were all the diocesan "comitatus" commanders in the West: Gaul, Britannia, Illyricum (West), Africa, Tingitania and Hispania. In contrast to their eastern counterparts, who all held "magister militum" rank, the commanders of the Western regional "comitatus" were all of the lower "comes rei militaris" ("military count") rank, save for the "magister equitum per Gallias". This was presumably because all but the Gaul "comitatus" were smaller than the 20–30,000 typically commanded by a "magister militum".


title: Late Roman army

text: According to the "Notitia", all but two of the 12 Western "duces" also reported directly to the MVM and not to their diocesan "comes". However, this is out of line with the situation in the East and probably does not reflect the situation in 395.


title: Late Roman army

text: In both East and West, the "scholae", the emperors' personal cavalry escort, lay outside the normal military chain of command. According to the "Notitia", the "tribuni" (commanders) of the "scholae" reported to the "magister officiorum", a senior civilian official. However, this was probably for administrative purposes only. On campaign, a "tribunus scholae" probably reported direct to the emperor himself.


title: Late Roman army

text: The troops of the field armies and of the border armies had different arrangements for their accommodation. The troops of the field armies were often billeted on the civilian population, while the troops of the border armies had permanent bases.


title: Late Roman army

text: Most border units were based in forts as were their predecessors, the legions and auxiliary units of the Principate; in many cases they were based in the same forts. Some of the larger "limitanei" units ("legiones" and "vexillationes") were based in cities, probably in permanent barracks. Because units of limitanei operated in one area, had their own camps, and often recruited from the same area, they tended to maintain better relations with the locals than the comitatenses and palatini, who would often be transferred to other areas, and were often quartered in civilian homes.


title: Late Roman army

text: The units of the field armies, including "palatini", "comitatenses", and sometimes "pseudocomitatenses", were based in cities when not on campaign, and could be based in temporary camps when on campaign. But it seems that did not usually occupy purpose-built accommodation like the city-based "limitanei". From the legal evidence, it seems they were normally compulsorily billeted in private houses ("hospitalitas"). This is because they often wintered in different provinces. The "comitatus praesentales" accompanied their respective emperors on campaign, while even the regional "comitatus" would change their winter quarters according to operational requirements. However, in the 5th century, emperors rarely campaigned in person, so the "praesentales" became more static in their winter bases. The Western "comitatus praesentalis" normally was based in and around "Mediolanum" (Milan) and the two Eastern "comitatus" in the vicinity of Constantinople.


title: Late Roman army

text: The changes to unit structure in the 4th century were reduction of unit sizes and increase in unit numbers, establishment of new unit types and establishment of a hierarchy of units more complex than the old one of legions and auxilia.


title: Late Roman army

text: The evidence for the strength of late army units is very fragmented and equivocal. The table below gives some recent estimates of unit strength, by unit type and grade:


title: Late Roman army

text: Much uncertainty remains, especially regarding the size of "limitanei" regiments, as can be seen by the wide ranges of the size estimates. It is also possible, if not likely, that unit strengths changed over the course of the 4th century. For example, it appears that Valentinian I split about 150 "comitatus" units with his brother and co-emperor Valens. The resulting units may have been just half the strength of the parent units (unless a major recruitment drive was held to bring them all up to original strength).


title: Late Roman army

text: In the "comitatus", there is consensus that "vexillationes" were c. 500 and "legiones" c. 1,000 strong. The greatest uncertainty concerns the size of the crack "auxilia palatina" infantry regiments, originally formed by Constantine. The evidence is contradictory, suggesting that these units could have been either c. 500 or c. 1,000 strong, or somewhere in between. If the higher figure were true, then there would be little to distinguish "auxilia" from "legiones", which is the strongest argument in favour of c. 500.


title: Late Roman army

text: For the size of "limitanei" units, opinion is divided. Jones and Elton suggest from the scarce and ambiguous literary evidence that border "legiones" numbered c. 1,000 men and that the other units contained in the region of 500 men each. Others draw on papyrus and more recent archaeological evidence to argue that "limitanei" units probably averaged about half the Jones/Elton strength i.e. c. 500 for "legiones" and around 250 for other units.


title: Late Roman army

text: Despite existing from the early 4th century, the only full list of "scholae" available is in the "Notitia", which shows the position at the end of the 4th century/early 5th century. At that time, there were 12 "scholae", of which 5 were assigned to the Western emperor and 7 to the Eastern. These regiments of imperial escort cavalry would have totalled c. 6,000 men, compared to 2,000 "equites singulares Augusti" in the late 2nd century. The great majority (10) of the "scholae" were "conventional" cavalry, armoured in a manner similar to the "alae" of the Principate, carrying the titles "scutarii" ("shield-men"), "armaturae" ("armour" or "harnesses") or "gentiles" ("natives"). These terms appear to have become purely honorific, although they may originally have denoted special equipment or ethnic composition ("gentiles" were barbarian tribesmen admitted to the empire on a condition of military service). Only two "scholae", both in the East, were specialised units: a "schola" of "clibanarii" (cataphracts, or heavily armoured cavalry), and a unit of mounted archers ("sagittarii"). 40 select troops from the "scholae", called "candidati" from their white uniforms, acted as the emperor's personal bodyguards.


title: Late Roman army

text: In the field armies, cavalry units were known as "vexillationes palatini" and "vex. comitatenses"; infantry units as either "legiones palatini", "auxilia palatini", "leg. comitatenses", and "pseudocomitatenses". "Auxilia" were only graded as "palatini", emphasising their elite status, while the "legiones" are graded either "palatini" or "comitatenses".


title: Late Roman army

text: The majority of Roman cavalry regiments in the "comitatus" (61%) remained of the traditional semi-armoured type, similar in equipment and tactical role to the "alae" of the Principate and suitable for mêlée combat. These regiments carry a variety of titles: "comites", "equites scutarii", "equites stablesiani" or "equites promoti". Again, these titles are probably purely traditional, and do not indicate different unit types or functions. 24% of regiments were unarmoured light cavalry, denoted "equites Dalmatae", "equites Mauri" or "equites sagittarii" (mounted archers), suitable for harassment and pursuit. Mauri light horse had served Rome as auxiliaries since the Second Punic War 500 years before. "Equites Dalmatae", on the other hand, seem to have been regiments first raised in the 3rd century. 15% of "comitatus" cavalry regiments were heavily armoured "cataphractarii" or "clibanarii", which were suitable for the shock charge (all but one such squadrons are listed as "comitatus" regiments by the "Notitia")


title: Late Roman army

text: Infantry units mostly fought in close order as did their forebears from the Principate. Infantry equipment was broadly similar to that of auxiliaries in the 2nd century, with some modifications (see Equipment, below).


title: Late Roman army

text: In the "limitanei", most types of unit were present. Infantry units include "milites", "numeri" and "auxilia" as well as old-style "legiones" and "cohortes". Cavalry units include "equites", "cunei" and old-style "alae".


title: Late Roman army

text: The evidence is that units of the "comitatenses" were believed to be higher quality than of the "limitanei". But the difference should not be exaggerated. Suggestions have been made that the "limitanei" were a part-time militia of local farmers, of poor combat capability. This view is rejected by many modern scholars. The evidence is that "limitanei" were full-time professionals. They were charged with combating the incessant small-scale barbarian raids that were the empire's enduring security problem. It is therefore likely that their combat readiness and experience were high. This was demonstrated at the siege of Amida (359) where the besieged frontier legions resisted the Persians with great skill and tenacity. Elton suggests that the lack of mention in the sources of barbarian incursions less than 400-strong implies that such were routinely dealt with by the border forces without the need of assistance from the "comitatus". "Limitanei" regiments often joined the "comitatus" for specific campaigns, and were sometimes retained by the "comitatus" long-term with the title of "pseudocomitatenses", implying adequate combat capability.


title: Late Roman army

text: The late Roman army contained a significant number of heavily armoured cavalry called "cataphractarii" (from the Greek "kataphraktos", meaning "covered all over"). They were covered from neck to foot by a combination of scale and/or lamellar armour for the torso and laminated defences for the limbs (see manica), and their horses were often armoured also. Cataphracts carried a long, heavy lance called a "contus", c. long, that was held in both hands. Some also carried bows. The central tactic of cataphracts was the shock charge, which aimed to break the enemy line by concentrating overwhelming force on a defined section of it. A type of cataphract called a "clibanarius" also appears in the 4th-century record. This term may be derived from Greek "klibanos" (a bread oven) or from a Persian word. It is likely that "clibanarius" is simply an alternative term to cataphract, or it may have been a special type of cataphract. This type of cavalry had been developed by the Iranian horse-based nomadic tribes of the Eurasian steppes from the 6th century BC onwards: the Scythians and their kinsmen the Sarmatians. The type was adopted by the Parthians in the 1st century BC and later by the Romans, who needed it to counter Parthians in the East and the Sarmatians along the Danube. The first regiment of Roman cataphracts to appear in the archaeological record is the "ala I Gallorum et Pannoniorum cataphractaria", attested in Pannonia in the early 2nd century. Although Roman cataphracts were not new, they were far more numerous in the late army, with most regiments stationed in the East. However, several of the regiments placed in the Eastern army had Gaulish names, indicating an ultimately Western origin.


title: Late Roman army

text: Archer units are denoted in the "Notitia" by the term "equites sagittarii" (mounted archers) and "sagittarii" (foot archers, from "sagitta" = "arrow"). As in the Principate, it is likely that many non-"sagittarii" regiments also contained some archers. Mounted archers appear to have been exclusively in light cavalry units. Archer units, both foot and mounted, were present in the "comitatus". In the border forces, only mounted archers are listed in the "Notitia", which may indicate that many "limitanei" infantry regiments contained their own archers.


title: Late Roman army

text: A distinctive feature of the late army is the appearance of independent units of artillery, which during the Principate appears to have been integral to the legions. Called "ballistarii" (from "ballista" = "catapult"), 7 such units are listed in the "Notitia", all but one belonging to the "comitatus". But a number are denoted "pseudocomitatenses", implying that they originally belonged to the border forces. The purpose of independent artillery units was presumably to permit heavy concentration of firepower, especially useful for sieges. However, it is likely that many ordinary regiments continued to possess integral artillery, especially in the border forces.


title: Late Roman army

text: The "Notitia" lists a few units of presumably light infantry with names denoting specialist function: "superventores" and "praeventores" ("interceptors") "exculcatores" ("trackers"), "exploratores" ("scouts"). At the same time, Ammianus describes light-armed troops with various terms: "velites", "leves armaturae", "exculcatores", "expediti". It is unclear from the context whether any of these were independent units, specialist sub-units, or indeed just detachments of ordinary troops specially armed for a particular operation. The "Notitia" evidence implies that, at least in some cases, Ammianus could be referring to independent units.


title: Late Roman army

text: "Bucellarii" (the Latin plural of "bucellarius"; literally "biscuit–eater", ) is a term for professional soldiers in the late Roman and Byzantine Empire, who were not supported directly by the state but rather by an individual, though they also took an oath of obedience to the reigning emperor. The employers of these "household troops" were usually prominent generals or high ranking civilian bureaucrats. Units of these troops were generally quite small, but, especially during the many civil wars, they could grow to number several thousand men. In effect, the "bucellarii" were small private armies equipped and paid by wealthy and influential people. As such they were quite often better trained and equipped, not to mention motivated, than the regular soldiers of the time. Originating in the late fourth century, they increased in importance until, in the early Byzantine army, they could form major elements of expeditionary armies. Notable employers of "bucellarii" included the "magistri militiae" Stilicho and Aetius, and the Praetorian Prefect Rufinus.


title: Late Roman army

text: Outside the regular army were substantial numbers of allied forces, generally known as "foederati" (from "foedus" = "treaty") or "symmachi" in the East. The latter were forces supplied either by barbarian chiefs under their treaty of alliance with Rome or "dediticii". Such forces were employed by the Romans throughout imperial history e.g. the battle scenes from Trajan's Column in Rome show that "foederati" troops played an important part in the Dacian Wars (101–6).


title: Late Roman army

text: In the 4th century, as during the Principate, these forces were organised into ill-defined units based on a single ethnic group called "numeri" ("troops", although "numerus" was also the name of a regular infantry unit). They served alongside the regular army for the duration of particular campaigns or for a specified period. Normally their service would be limited to the region where the tribe lived, but sometimes could be deployed elsewhere. They were commanded by their own leaders. It is unclear whether they used their own weapons and armour or the standard equipment of the Roman army. In the late army, the more useful and long-serving "numeri" appear to have been absorbed into the regular late army, rapidly becoming indistinguishable from other units.


title: Late Roman army

text: During the Principate, it appears that most recruits, both legionary and auxiliary, were volunteers ("voluntarii"). Compulsory conscription ("dilectus") was never wholly abandoned, but was generally only used in emergencies or before major campaigns when large numbers of additional troops were required. In marked contrast, the late army relied mainly on compulsion for its recruitment of Roman citizens. Firstly, the sons of serving soldiers or veterans were required by law to enlist. Secondly, a regular annual levy was held based on the "indictio" (land tax assessment). Depending on the amount of land tax due on his estates, a landowner (or group of landowners) would be required to provide a commensurate number of recruits to the army. Naturally, landowners had a strong incentive to keep their best young men to work on their estates, sending the less fit or reliable for military service. There is also evidence that they tried to cheat the draft by offering the sons of soldiers (who were liable to serve anyway) and vagrants ("vagi") to fulfil their quota.


title: Late Roman army

text: However, conscription was not in practice universal. Firstly, a land-based levy meant recruits were exclusively the sons of peasants, as opposed to townspeople. Thus some 20% of the empire's population was excluded. In addition, as during the Principate, slaves were not admissible. Nor were freedmen and persons in certain occupations such as bakers and innkeepers. In addition, provincial officials and "curiales" (city council members) could not enlist. These rules were relaxed only in emergencies, as during the military crisis of 405–6 (Radagaisus' invasion of Italy and the great barbarian invasion of Gaul). Most importantly, the conscription requirement was often commuted into a cash levy, at a fixed rate per recruit due. This was done for certain provinces, in certain years, although the specific details are largely unknown. It appears from the very slim available evidence that conscription was not applied evenly across provinces but concentrated heavily in the army's traditional recruiting areas of Gaul (including the two "Germaniae" provinces along the Rhine) and the Danubian provinces, with other regions presumably often commuted. An analysis of the known origins of "comitatenses" in the period 350–476 shows that in the Western army, the Illyricum and Gaul dioceses together provided 52% of total recruits. Overall, the Danubian regions provided nearly half of the whole army's recruits, despite containing only three of the 12 dioceses. This picture is much in line with the 2nd-century position.


title: Late Roman army

text: Prospective recruits had to undergo an examination. Recruits had to be 20–25 years of age, a range that was extended to 19–35 in the later 4th century. Recruits had to be physically fit and meet the traditional minimum height requirement of 6 Roman feet (5 ft 10in, 178 cm) until 367, when it was reduced to 5 Roman feet and 3 Roman palms (5 ft 7in, 170 cm). Vegetius hints that in the very late Empire (ca. AD 400) even this height requirement may have been relaxed, for "... if necessity demands, it is right to take account not so much of stature as of strength. Even Homer himself is not wanting as a witness, since he records that Tydeus was small in body but a strong warrior".


title: Late Roman army

text: Once a recruit was accepted he was 'marked' on the arm, presumably a tattoo or brand, to facilitate recognition if he attempted to desert. The recruit was then issued with an identification disk (which was worn around the neck) and a certificate of enlistment ("probatoria"). He was then assigned to a unit. A law of 375 required those with superior fitness to be assigned to the "comitatenses". In the 4th century, the minimum length of service was 20 years (24 years in some "limitanei" units). This compares with 25 years in both legions and auxilia during the Principate.


title: Late Roman army

text: The widespread use of conscription, the compulsory recruitment of soldiers' sons, the relaxation of age and height requirements and the branding of recruits all add up to a picture of an army that had severe difficulties in finding, and retaining, sufficient recruits. Recruitment difficulties are confirmed in the legal code evidence: there are measures to deal with cases of self-mutilation to avoid military service (such as cutting off a thumb), including an extreme decree of 386 requiring such persons to be burnt alive. Desertion was clearly a serious problem, and was probably much worse than in the army of the Principate, since the latter was mainly a volunteer army. This is supported by the fact that the granting of leave of absence ("commeatus") was more strictly regulated. While in the 2nd century, a soldier's leave was granted at the discretion of his regimental commander, in the 4th century, leave could only be granted by a far senior officer ("dux", "comes" or "magister militum"). In addition, it appears that "comitatus" units were typically one-third understrength. The massive disparity between official and actual strength is powerful evidence of recruitment problems. Against this, Elton argues that the late army did not have serious recruitment problems, on the basis of the large numbers of exemptions from conscription that were granted.


title: Late Roman army

text: "Barbari" ("barbarians") was the generic term used by the Romans to denote peoples resident beyond the borders of the empire, and best translates as "foreigners" (it is derived from a Greek word meaning "to babble": a reference to their incomprehensible languages).


title: Late Roman army

text: Most scholars believe that significant numbers of "barbari" were recruited throughout the Principate by the auxilia (the legions were closed to non-citizens). However, there is little evidence of this before the 3rd century. The scant evidence suggests that the vast majority, if not all, of auxilia were Roman peregrini (second-class citizens) or Roman citizens. In any case, the 4th-century army was probably much more dependent on barbarian recruitment than its 1st/2nd-century predecessor. The evidence for this may be summarised as follows:


title: Late Roman army

text: Quantification of the proportion of barbarian-born troops in the 4th-century army is highly speculative. Elton has undertaken the most detailed analysis of the meagre evidence. According to this analysis, about a quarter of the sample of army officers was barbarian-born in the period 350–400. Analysis by decade shows that this proportion did not increase over the period, or indeed in the early 5th century. The latter trend implies that the proportion of barbarians in the lower ranks was not much greater, otherwise the proportion of barbarian officers would have increased over time to reflect that.


title: Late Roman army

text: If the proportion of barbarians was in the region of 25%, then it is probably much higher than in the 2nd-century regular army. If the same proportion had been recruited into the auxilia of the 2nd-century army, then in excess of 40% of recruits would have been barbarian-born, since the auxilia constituted 60% of the regular land army. There is no evidence that recruitment of barbarians was on such a large scale in the 2nd century. An analysis of named soldiers of non-Roman origin shows that 75% were Germanic: Franks, Alamanni, Saxons, Goths, and Vandals are attested in the "Notitia" unit names. Other significant sources of recruits were the Sarmatians from the Danubian lands; and Armenians and Iberians from the Caucasus region.


title: Late Roman army

text: In contrast to Roman recruits, the vast majority of barbarian recruits were probably volunteers, drawn by conditions of service and career prospects that to them probably appeared desirable, in contrast to their living conditions at home. A minority of barbarian recruits were enlisted by compulsion, namely "dediticii" (barbarians who surrendered to the Roman authorities, often to escape strife with neighbouring tribes) and tribes who were defeated by the Romans, and obliged, as a condition of peace, to undertake to provide a specified number of recruits annually. Barbarians could be recruited directly, as individuals enrolled into regular regiments, or indirectly, as members of irregular "foederati" units transformed into regular regiments.


title: Late Roman army

text: At the base of the rank pyramid were the common soldiers: "pedes" (infantryman) and "eques" (cavalryman). Unlike his 2nd-century counterpart, the 4th-century soldier's food and equipment was not deducted from his salary ("stipendium"), but was provided free. This is because the "stipendium", paid in debased silver "denarii", was under Diocletian worth far less than in the 2nd century. It lost its residual value under Constantine and ceased to be paid regularly in mid-4th century.


title: Late Roman army

text: The soldier's sole substantial disposable income came from the "donativa", or cash bonuses handed out periodically by the emperors, as these were paid in gold "solidi" (which were never debased), or in pure silver. There was a regular donative of 5 "solidi" every five years of an "Augustus" reign (i.e. one "solidus" p.a.) Also, on the accession of a new "Augustus", 5 "solidi" plus a pound of silver (worth 4 "solidi", totaling 9 "solidi") were paid. The 12 "Augusti" that ruled the West between 284 and 395 averaged about nine years per reign. Thus the accession donatives would have averaged about 1 "solidus" p.a. The late soldier's disposable income would thus have averaged at least 2 "solidi" per annum. It is also possible, but undocumented, that the accession bonus was paid for each "Augustus" and/or a bonus for each "Caesar". The documented income of 2 "solidi" was only a quarter of the disposable income of a 2nd-century legionary (which was the equivalent of c. 8 "solidi"). The late soldier's discharge package (which included a small plot of land) was also minuscule compared with a 2nd-century legionary's, worth just a tenth of the latter's.


title: Late Roman army

text: Despite the disparity with the Principate, Jones and Elton argue that 4th-century remuneration was attractive compared to the hard reality of existence at subsistence level that most recruits' peasant families had to endure. Against that has to be set the clear unpopularity of military service.


title: Late Roman army

text: However, pay would have been much more attractive in higher-grade units. The top of the pay pyramid were the "scholae" elite cavalry regiments. Next came "palatini" units, then "comitatenses", and finally "limitanei". There is little evidence about the pay differentials between grades. But that they were substantial is shown by the example that an "actuarius" (quartermaster) of a "comitatus" regiment was paid 50% more than his counterpart in a "pseudocomitatensis" regiment.


title: Late Roman army

text: Regimental officer grades in old-style units ("legiones", "alae" and "cohortes") remained the same as under the Principate up to and including centurion and decurion. In the new-style units, ("vexillationes", "auxilia", etc.), ranks with quite different names are attested, seemingly modelled on the titles of local authority bureaucrats. So little is known about these ranks that it is impossible to equate them with the traditional ranks with any certainty. Vegetius states that the "ducenarius" commanded, as the name implies, 200 men. If so, the "centenarius" may have been the equivalent of a centurion in the old-style units. Probably the most accurate comparison is by known pay levels:


title: Late Roman army

text: The table shows that the pay differentials enjoyed by the senior officers of a 4th-century regiment were much smaller than those of their 2nd-century counterparts, a position in line with the smaller remuneration enjoyed by 4th-century high administrative officials.


title: Late Roman army

text: The table above indicates the ranks of officers who held a commission ("sacra epistula", lit: "solemn letter"). This was presented to the recipient by the emperor in person at a dedicated ceremony.


title: Late Roman army

text: A significant innovation of the 4th century was the corps of "protectores", which contained cadet senior officers. Although "protectores" were supposed to be soldiers who had risen through the ranks by meritorious service, it became a widespread practice to admit to the corps young men from outside the army (often the sons of senior officers). The "protectores" formed a corps that was both an officer training-school and pool of staff officers available to carry out special tasks for the "magistri militum" or the emperor. Those attached to the emperor were known as "protectores domestici" and organised in four "scholae" under a "comes domesticorum". After a few years' service in the corps, a "protector" would normally be granted a commission by the emperor and placed in command of a military regiment.


title: Late Roman army

text: Regimental commanders were known by one of three possible titles: "tribunus" (for "comitatus" regiments plus border "cohortes"), "praefectus" (most other "limitanei" regiments) or "praepositus" (for "milites" and some ethnic allied units). However, "tribunus" was used colloquially to denote the commander of any regiment. Although most "tribuni" were appointed from the corps of "protectores", a minority, again mainly the sons of high-ranking serving officers, were directly commissioned outsiders. The status of regimental commanders varied enormously depending on the grade of their unit. At the top end, some commanders of "scholae" were granted the noble title of "comes", a practice which became standard after 400.


title: Late Roman army

text: The "comitiva" or "Order of Companions (of the emperor)", was an order of nobility established by Constantine I to honour senior administrative and military officials, especially in the imperial entourage. It partly overlapped with the established orders of Senators and of Knights, in that it could be awarded to members of either (or of neither). It was divided into three grades, of which only the first, "comes primi ordinis" (lit. "Companion of the First Rank", which carried senatorial rank), retained any value beyond AD 450, due to excessive grant. In many cases, the title was granted "ex officio", but it could also be purely honorary.


title: Late Roman army

text: In the military sphere, the title of "comes primi ordinis" was granted to a group of senior "tribuni". These included (1) the commander of the "protectores domestici", who by 350 was known as the "comes domesticorum"; (2) some "tribuni" of "scholae": after c. 400, "scholae" commanders were routinely granted the title on appointment; (3) the commanders of a brigade of two twinned "comitatus" regiments were apparently styled "comites". (Such twinned regiments would always operate and transfer together e.g. the legions "Ioviani" and "Herculiani"); (4) finally, some tribunes without a regimental command ("tribuni vacantes"), who served as staff-officers to the emperor or to a "magister militum", might be granted the title. These officers were not equal in military rank with a "comes rei militaris", who was a corps commander (usually of a smaller diocesan "comitatus"), rather than the commander of only one or two regiments (or none).


title: Late Roman army

text: The commanders of army corps, i.e. army groups composed of several regiments, were known as (in ascending order of rank): "duces limitis", "comites rei militaris", and "magistri militum". These officers corresponded in rank to generals and field marshals in modern armies.


title: Late Roman army

text: A Dux (or, rarely, "comes") limitis (lit. "Border Leader"), was in command of the troops ("limitanei"), and fluvial flotillas, deployed in a border province. Until the time of Constantine I, the "dux" reported to the "vicarius" of the diocese in which their forces were deployed. After c. 360, the "duces" generally reported to the commander of the "comitatus" deployed in their diocese (whether a "magister militum" or "comes"). However, they were entitled to correspond directly with the emperor, as various imperial rescripts show. A few border commanders were, exceptionally, styled "comes" e.g. the "comes litoris Saxonici" ("Count of the Saxon Shore") in Britain.