title: Amended proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive to facilitate practice of the profession of lawyer on a permanent basis in a Member State other than that in which the qualification was obtained

eurovoc_concepts:
access to a profession
lawyer
professional qualifications
recognition of diplomas
right of establishment

formats: pdf pdfa1b print

text: COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 24. 09. 1996 COM(96) 446 final 94/0299 (COD) Amended proposal for a EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL DIRECTIVE to facilitate practice of the profession of lawyer on a permanent basis in a Member State other than that in which the qualification was obtained (presented by the Commission pursuant to Article 189 a (2) of the EC-Treaty) EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS On 19 June 1996 the European Parliament delivered its opinion, at first reading as part of the co-decision procedure, on the proposal for a Directive to facilitate practice of the profession of lawyer on a permanent basis in a Member State other than that in which the qualification was obtained. those The Commission accepted Parliament's main amendments, particularly concerning the home-country the permanent character of establishment under professional title and the replacement of the aptitude test by a verification procedure for professional qualifications. It also took on board most of the other amendments presented by Parliament. The only amendments which it was unable to accept concerned four points which were of minor importance in the overall structure of the Directive but raised questions of principle. 2. ANALYSIS OF AMENDMENTS 1. The main amendments concern the permanent nature of the right to practise under the home-country professional title (amendment 10, concerning Article 2) and the replacement of the aptitude test by- a verification procedure for professional qualifications (amendment 35, concerning Article 10(2)). The permanent character of establishment under the home-country professional title was requested by Parliament's Legal Affairs Committee, inter alia in the light of the judgment handed down by the Court of Justice on 30 November 1995 in Case C-55/94 Gebhard v Milan Bar Council (see point 4. 2. 3 of this report). The Economic and Social Committee expressed the same view in its opinion dated 5 July 1995 on the proposal for a Directive, as did the Council of the Bars and Law Societies of the European Community (CCBE) on 17 November 1995. The replacement of the aptitude test by a verification procedure for professional qualifications is designed to make it easier for lawyers who have accumulated a certain amount of experience but do not have time to prepare for the aptitude test to obtain the professional title of the host country. It should also be noted that exemption from the aptitude test as proposed by the Commission where lawyers can prove that they have pursued an activity involving the law of the host Member State for at least three years was accepted by Parliament subject to a few amendments (amendment 24, concerning Article 10(1)). 2. The following amendments will entail major changes: salaried practice to be aligned on Council Directive 77/249/EEC of 22 March 1977 to facilitate the effective exercise by lawyers of freedom to provide services (amendments 22 and 23, concerning Article 8) and consolidation of the host Member State's powers to oppose groupings controlled by persons who are not members of the legal profession (amendment 27, concerning Article 11). The authorization of salaried practice except in the case of certain specified activities is in line with the wishes of ECLA (European Company Lawyers Association). The restrictions on multidisciplinary practice, which reflect the position adopted by the CCBE on 17 November 1995, are in keeping with the reservations raised by the Economic and Social Committee. 2 3. The amendments that the Commission was unable to accept provided for the inclusion of Dutch "procureurs" (amendment 28 ex. 7, concerning Article 1), the exclusion of lawyers who have responsibilities within a government department (amendment 9, Article 1), proof of honourability (amendment 12, concerning Article 3(2)) and the obligation for the host Member State to exempt migrant lawyers from the requirement to join its social security scheme (amendment 21, Article 6). The Commission rejected these amendments for the following reasons. Dutch "procureurs" do not carry out the same duties as advocates. The exclusion of lawyers with responsibilities within a government department is not necessary in order to ensure that the specific procedures of supreme courts are complied with by virtue of the possible requirement to work in conjunction with a lawyer who practises before the judicial authority in question, as provided for in Article 5 of the proposal for a Directive; furthermore, such exclusion would deprive those lawyers of the benefits of the Directive and might lead to further requests for exclusion, for example for actions before the social or tax courts. Proof that the party concerned meets the honour, seems honourability disproportionate in view of the safeguards already provided for in Article 3 (certificate attesting to his registration), Article 7 (disciplinary proceedings) and Article 13 (cooperation between the competent authorities in the home and host Member States) of the proposal for a Directive. Such proof is not required by Directive 77/249 to facilitate the effective exercise by lawyers of freedom to provide services. As regards the obligation for the host Member State to exempt lawyers from the requirement that they join its social security scheme, it is contrary to Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, self employed persons and their families moving within the Community,1 and in particular Articles 13 and 17 thereof. In addition, this Regulation, which is based on Articles 51 and 235 of the EC Treaty, can be amended only unanimously, which excludes it from the present competence of Parliament in the co-decision procedure. requirements associated with his duties and probity 3. CONCLUSIONS The amended proposal for a Directive takes account, in so far as possible, of the concerns expressed by the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the legal profession, represented by the CCBE. The European Parliament and the Council are invited to adopt the amended proposal as set out below: A consolidated version was published in OJ No C 325, 10. 12. 1992. 3 Amended proposal for a EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL DIRECTIVE to facilitate practice of the profession of lawyer on a permanent basis in a Member State other than that in which the qualification was obtained THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 49, Article 57(1) and the first and third sentences of Article 57(2) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission1, Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee2. Acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 189b of the Treaty3 ORIGINAL PROPOSAL AMENDED PROPOSAL (unchanged unless mentioned below) 1 OJ NoC 128 of 24. 5. 95, p. 6 :OJ NoC 256 of 2. 10. 95. p. 14 -" Opinion of the European Parliament of 19 June 1996, OJ N° C Common position of the Council of. 1996 (not yet published in the Official Journal) Decision of the European Parliament of. (not yet published in the Official Journal) ( 1 ) (2) the internal market pursuant the Treaty, Whereas, pursuant to Article 7a of the is Treaty, to internal comprise an area without to frontiers; whereas, Article 3(c) of the abolition, as between Member States, of obstacles to freedom of movement for persons and services constitutes one of the Community; whereas, for nationals of the Member States, this means among other the possibility of practising a profession, whether in a self-employed or a salaried capacity, in a Member State other than that in which they obtained their professional qualifications; objectives things the of of the recognition completion to Council Whereas, pursuant of Directive 89/48/EEC a general 21 December 1988 on system of for higher-education diplomas awarded on professional education and training of at least three years' duration,4 a lawyer who is fully qualified in one Member State may already ask to have his diploma recognized with a view to establishing himself in another Member State in order to practise the profession of lawyer there under the professional title used in that State; whereas the objective of Directive 89/48/EEC is to ensure that a migrant lawyer is integrated into the profession in the host Member State, and the Directive seeks neither to modify the rules regulating the profession in that State nor to remove such a lawyer from the ambit of those rules; O J N oL 19, 24. 1. 1989, p. 16. 5" (3) (4) (5) in the profession Whereas while some migrant lawyers may become quickly integrated into host the Member State inter alia by passing an for aptitude in test as provided others may Directive 89/48/EEC, envisage such integration at the end of a period of professional practice in the host Member State their home-country professional titles; under test aptitude as provided (3) Whereas while some migrant lawyers may become quickly integrated into the profession in the host Member State inter alia by passing an in Directive 89/48/EEC, others may envisage such integration after a certain period of professional practice in the host Member State under their home-country professional titles or else continue to practise under their home- country professional titles ; for (4)Whereas at the end of that period the migrant lawyer should be able to gain access to the profession after verification that he possesses professional experience in the host Member State; Whereas at the end of that period, which may not be longer than five years, the migrant lawyer should be able to gain access to the profession either automatically, where he has effectively practised the law of the host including for an unbroken Community period of three years, or, where that is not the case but where he can furnish evidence of professional experience in after host Member State, the undergoing a compensatory measure in the form of a simplified aptitude test; Member State law into integrate the profession (5)Whereas action along these lines is justified at Community level not only because, compared with the general system for the recognition of diplomas, it provides lawyers with an easier means whereby they can in a host Member State, but also because, by enabling lawyers to practise temporarily under their home-country professional titles on a permanent basis in a host Member State, it meets the needs of consumers of legal services who, owing to the increasing trade flows resulting from the internal market, seek advice when carrying out cross-border transactions in which law and domestic international law, Community laws often overlap; for the they practise recognition Whereas action along these lines is justified at Community level not only because, compared with the general system of diplomas, it provides lawyers with a new means whereby, after a transition period, the can profession on a permanent basis in a host Member State, but also because, to practise lawyers by enabling temporarily under their home-country professional titles, it meets the needs of consumers of legal services who, owing to the increasing trade flows the internal market, resulting from carrying out seek in which transactions cross-border international law, Community law and domestic laws often overlap; advice when (6) (7) in level because a is also justified at Whereas action few Community Member States already permit in their territory pursuit of the activities of lawyers, otherwise than by way of provision of services, by lawyers from other Member States practising under their home-country professional titles; whereas, the however, Member States where this possibility exists the practical details concerning, for example, the area of activity and to register with the the obligation differ authorities competent considerably; whereas such a diversity of situations leads to inequalities and in competition between distortions lawyers from the Member States and is of movement; whereas only a directive laying down the conditions governing practice of the profession, otherwise than by way of provision of services, their by lawyers practising under is home-country professional capable of resolving these difficulties same and affording of opportunities and to consumers of legal services in all Member States; the lawyers an obstacle freedom titles to in keeping with Whereas, its objective, this Directive does not lay down any rules concerning purely domestic situations, and where it does affect national rules regulating the legal profession it does so no more its than to achieve it purpose effectively; whereas is without national prejudice legislation governing access to and practice of the profession of lawyer under the professional title used in the host Member State; is necessary to \ (8) (9) lawyers covered by required should be this Whereas Directive to register with the competent authority in the host Member State in order that that authority might ensure that they abide by the rules of professional conduct in force in that State; whereas the effect of such registration as regards the jurisdictions in which, and the levels and types of court before which, is determined by the law applicable to lawyers in the host Member State; lawyers may practise Whereas lawyers who are not yet full integrated into the profession in the host Member State should practise in that State under their home-country professional titles so as to ensure that consumers are properly informed and to distinguish between such lawyers host and the Member State practising under professional title used there; lawyers from the 9 (10) Whereas as be and under made, Ireland allowed practising lawyers covered by this Directive should be permitted to give advice on the law of their home Member States, on Community law, on international law and on the law of the host Member State; whereas this is already under Council Directive 77/249/EEC of 22 March 1977 to facilitate the effective exercise by lawyers of freedom to provide services5, as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, as regards the provision of services; whereas, however, provision should in Directive 77/249/EEC, for the option of excluding from the activities of lawyers their home-country professional titles in the United Kingdom the formal of preparation documents in the conveyancing and this probate the Directive provisions under which, in every Member State, certain activities are reserved for professions other than the the legal in Directive 77/249/EEC provision the host concerning the right of Member State lawyer practising under his home-country professional in conjunction with a local lawyer when representing or defending a client in legal proceedings should also be incorporated this Directive; whereas that requirement must be interpreted in the light of the case law the of European Communities, in particular its judgment of 25 February 1998 in Case 427/85 Commission v Germany^; spheres; whereas in no way affects the Court of Justice to require a profession; to work whereas certain title of in (11) Whereas the list of professional titles used in Italy must be extended to include procuratore legale, as such persons now carry on the same activities as an avvocato; 5 OJ No L 78, 26. 3. 1977, p. 17. 6(1988)ECR, p. 1123. « the (12) Whereas a lawyer registered under his home-country professional title in the host Member State must remain registered with competent authority in his home Member State if he is to retain his status of lawyer and be covered by this Directive; whereas for that reason close collaboration between the competent authorities is indispensable, notably in connection with any disciplinary proceedings; (13) Whereas lawyers covered by this Directive may, irrespective of their status of salaried or self-employed lawyers in their home Member States, practise as salaried lawyers in the host Member State that Member State offers this possibility to its own lawyers; where lawyers covered by (13) Whereas this Directive may, as in Directive 77/249/EEC, where they practise as salaried lawyers, be excluded from certain activities in the host Member State where that Member State also excludes its own lawyers from such activities; \o in the effective pursuit (14) Whereas the purpose pursued by this Direc Court of Justice the host Member State must into consideration any professional take experience gained in its territory; whereas, after the host Member State regularly for a period of three years of an activity involving the law of that State including Community law, it is reasonable to assume that a lawyer will have gained sufficient experience to become fully there; integrated whereas at the end of that period the migrant lawyer should be able to gain access to the profession where he can, after verification, furnish experience of professional experience in the host Member State; into the legal profession into restriction consideration in enabling temporarily lawyers in under (14) Whereas the purpose pursued by this to Directive another practise Member State their home-country professional titles is to make it easier for them to practise the in profession without accordance with Directive 89/48/EEC; whereas under Articles 48 and 52 of the Treaty as interpreted by the Court of Justice the host Member State must take any professional experience gained in its territory; whereas, after the effective pursuit in the host Member State for an unbroken period of three years of an activity involving the law of that State including Community law, it is reasonable to assume that a lawyer will have gained sufficient experience to become fully integrated into the legal profession there; whereas total exemption from any compensatory measures be automatically granted, whereas, if the unbroken period of activity in the host Member State does not involve the State, law including the compensation Community to an measures must be aptitude test on the law of procedure and the rules of professional conduct in the host Member State. that law, therefore limited must of Deleted (15) Whereas lawyers practising under their home-country professional titles must be afforded the opportunity of attending lectures or seminars in the host Member State so that they might acquire a knowledge of that State's law, including the rules regulating professional practice and conduct, or add to their existing knowledge in those areas; w (16) Whereas, in to their practise a grouping economic there for and is a reasons, professional growing tendency for lawyers in the Community jointly; whereas the fact that lawyers belong to home Member State should not be used as a pretext to prevent or deter them from establishing themselves in the host Member State; whereas Member States should be allowed, however, to take appropriate measures of legitimate with profession's the safeguarding certain independence; whereas guarantees should be provided in those Member States which permit joint practice ; aim the in for there reasons, economic to a grouping (15) Whereas, and is a growing professional tendency for lawyers in the Community to practise jointly; whereas the fact that lawyers their home belong Member State should not be used as a pretext to prevent or deter them from establishing themselves in the host Member State; whereas Member States should be allowed, however, to take appropriate measures with the legitimate aim profession's independence; whereas certain guarantees should be provided in those Member States which permit joint practice ; safeguarding the of HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: Artkk I Object, scope and definitions The purpose of this Directive is to facilitate practice of the profession of lawyer on a permanent basis in a self-employed or salaried capacity in a Member State other than that in which the professional qualification was obtained. 2. For the purposes of this Directive : (a) "lawyer" means any person who is a national of a Member State and who is authorized to pursue his professional activities under one of the following professional titles: Belgium: Denmark: Germany: Greece: Spain: France: Ireland: Italy: Avocat Advocaat Rechtsanwalt Advokat Rechtsanwalt ôtxrryoQoç Abogado Spain: Abogado/Advocat/Avogado/Abokatu Avocat Barrister Solicitor Avvocato Procuratore legale Luxembourg: Avocat Netherlands: Advocaat Portugal: Advogado Austria Rechtsanwalt Finland, Asianajaja/Advokat \h Sweden Advokat United Kingdom: Advocate Barrister Solicitor. in which a the "home Member State" means Member State lawyer acquired the right to use one of the professional titles referred to in (a) before practising the profession of lawyer in another Member State. "host Member State" means Member State practises pursuant to this Directive. in which a the lawyer professional "home-country title" means the professional title used in the Member State in which a lawyer acquired the right to use that title before practising the profession of lawyer in the host Member State. "grouping" means any entity, with or formed legal personality, without under the law of a Member State, within which their professional activities jointly under a joint name. lawyers pursue (b) (c) (d) (e) (ea) "relevant professional title" or "relevant profession" means the professional title or profession competent authority with whom a lawyer has registered under Article 3, and "relevant competent authority" means that authority. governed the by H This Directive shall apply both to lawyers practising in a self-employed capacity and to lawyers practising in a home salaried Member State to Article 8, in the host Member State. the subject capacity and, in Practice of the profession of lawyer within the meaning of this Directive include the provision of shall not services, which by is Directive 77/249/EEC. covered Article 2 Temporary right home-country professional title to practise under the Right to practise under the home-country professional title in any five years Any lawyer shall be entitled to pursue for other Member State under his home-country professional activities specified in Article 5. Practice on a host permanent basis to Member State shall be subject Article 10. title the the in Any lawye» shall be entitled to pursue on a permanent basis in any other Member State under his home-country professional title the activities specified in Article 5. Integration into the profession of lawyer in the host Member State shall be subject to Article 10. l^ Article 3 Registration with the competent authority 1. A lawyer who wishes to practise in a Member State other than that in which he professional qualification shall register with the competent authority in that State. obtained his The competent authority in the host Member State shall register the lawyer upon presentation of a certificate attesting to his registration with the competent authority the home Member State. It may require that, when presented, the certificate be not more than three months old. It shall inform the competent authority in the home Member State the registration. of in of the purpose applying For paragraph 1 in the United Kingdom and Ireland, lawyers practising under a professional title other than those used in the United Kingdom or Ireland shall the authority register either with the profession of responsible the barrister or advocate or with the authority profession of solicitor. responsible for for lawyer who, wishes than in a l. A in which he Member State other obtained his professional qualification shall register with the relevant competent authority in that State. to practise that 2. The relevant competent authority in the host lawyer upon Member State shall register the presentation of a certificate attesting to his registration with the relevant competent authority in the home Member State. It may require that, when presented, the certificate be not more than It shall inform the relevant three months old. competent authority in the home Member State of the registration. IC of for the purpose authority responsible For applying paragraph 1 in the United Kingdom, the a barrister from Ireland shall be that responsible the profession of barrister or advocate, and the authority responsible for a solicitor from Ireland shall be the that responsible profession of solicitor. for for For the purpose of applying paragraph 1 in Ireland, the authority for a barrister or an responsible the United Kingdom advocate from the that responsible shall be profession the of barrister, authority responsible for a solicitor from the United Kingdom shall be that responsible the profession of solicitor. for and for 4. Where the competent authority in a the host Member State publishes names of lawyers registered with it, it shall also publish the names of lawyers registered pursuant to this Directive. 4. Where the relevant competent authority in a the names of host Member State publishes lawyers registered with it, it shall also publish the names of lawyers registered pursuant to this Directive. \lr Article 4 Temporarv practice under the home-countrv professional title Practice under the home-country professional title lawyer practising A in a host Member State under his home-country professional title shall do so under that title expressed in the official language or one of the official languages of his home Member State. 1. A lawyer practising in a host Member State under his home-country professional title shall do so under that title, which must be expressed in the official language or one of the official languages of his home Member State, in an intelligible manner and in such a way as to avoid confusion with the professional title of the host Member State. A host Member State may require a lawyer practising under his home- country professional title to indicate the professional body of which he is a member in his home Member State or the judicial authority before which he is entitled to practise pursuant to the laws of his home Member State. A host Member State may also require a his lawyer home-country professional to include a reference to his registration with the competent authority in that State. practising under title his under 2. For the purpose of applying paragraph 1, a host Member State may require a lawyer practising home-country professional title to indicate the professional body of which he is a member in his home Member State or the judicial authority before which he is entitled to practise pursuant to the laws of his home Member State. A host lawyer Member State may also require a practising home-country professional title to include a reference to his registration with the competent authority in that State. under his Deleted Where there is a risk of confusion with the professional title used in the host Member State, the competent authorities in that State may ask that a reference to the home Member State be added. itf Article 5 Area of activity 1. the under practising to paragraphs 2 and 3, a Subject lawyer his home-country professional title shall same professional carry on activities as a lawyer practising under the professional title used in the host Member State and may inter alia give law of his home advice on Member State, on Community law, on international law and on the law of the host Member State. the 1. Subject lawyer to paragraphs 2 and 3, a practising under his home-country professional the same professional title shall carry on the activities as a relevant professional the host Member State and may inter alia give advice on the law of his home Member State, on Community law, on international law and on the law of the host Member State. lawyer practising under title used in Member States which authorize in their territory a prescribed category of lawyers to prepare formal documents for obtaining title to administer estates of deceased persons and for creating or transferring interests in land which, in other Member States, are reserved for professions other than that of such lawyer may exclude activities lawyers practising under a title home-country conferred latter Member States. professional the in one of from in authorize 2. Member States which their territory a prescribed category of lawyers to prepare deeds for obtaining title to administer estates of deceased persons and for creating or transferring interests in land which, in other Member States, are reserved for professions other than that of lawyer may exclude from such activities a home-country professional title conferred in one of the latter Member States. practising lawyers under a as the law of lawyer mandatory, For the pursuit of activities relating to the representation or defence of a client in legal proceedings and in so far host the representation Member State makes that by Member State may require lawyers practising under their home-country in professional conjunction with a lawyer who practises before the judicial authority in question and who would, where necessary, be answerable that authority or with an "avoué" or "procuratore" practising before it. to work titles to For the pursuit of activities relating to the representation or defence of a client in legal proceedings and in so far as the law of the host Member State reserves such activities to lawyers practising under the professional title of that State, the latter may require lawyers practising under their home-country professional titles to work in conjunction with a lawyer who practises before the judicial authority in question and who would, where necessary, be answerable to that authority or with an "avoué" or "procuratore" practising before it. 3. \°v Article 6 Rules of professional conduct applicable 1. 2. of the rules of Irrespective professional conduct to which he is subject in his home Member State, a lawyer practising under his home- country professional title shall be subject to the rules of professional conduct of the host Member State in respect of all the activities he pursues in its territory. 1. Irrespective of the rules of professional conduct to which he is subject in his home Member State, a lawyer practising under his home-country professional title shall be subject to the same rules of professional lawyers practising under the relevant professional title of the host Member State in respect of all the activities he pursues in its territory. conduct as Lawyers practising under their home- country professional titles shall be granted appropriate representation in the professional associations of the host Such representation shall involve at least the right to vote in elections to those associations' governing bodies. Member State. 2o its fund The host Member State may require a lawyer practising under his home- country professional title either to take out professional indemnity insurance to become a member of a or professional in guarantee accordance with the rules which that for professional State lays down activities pursued territory. in lawyer practising Nevertheless, a under his home-country professional title shall be exempted from that requirement if he can prove that he is covered by insurance taken out or a guarantee provided in accordance with the rules of his home Member State, in so insurance or guarantee is equivalent in terms of the conditions and extent of cover. Where the equivalence is only partial, the competent the host authority that Member State may additional insurance or an additional guarantee be contracted to cover the elements which are not already covered by the insurance ors guarantee contracted the in accordance with rules of the home Member State. in require far as such l\ Article 7 Disciplinary proceedings title In the event of failure by a lawyer practising under his home-country professional the the host force obligations Member State, the rules of procedure, penalties and remedies provided for in the host Member State shall apply. fulfil in in to 3. 4. initiating disciplinary Before the lawyer, proceedings against a the host competent authority the Member State shall competent authority the home Member State as soon as possible, furnishing it with all the relevant details. in inform in shall authority Without prejudice to the decision the competent making power of authority in the host Member State, cooperate that disciplinary throughout the competent proceedings with authority in the home Member State. In particular, the host Member State shall take the measures necessary to ensure that the competent authority in the home Member State can make submissions to the bodies responsible for hearing any appeal. the The competent authority in the home Member State shall decide what action to take, under its own procedural and substantive rules, in the light of a decision of the competent authority in the host Member State concerning a lawyer practising under his home- country professional title. 1-L 5. or the temporary Although it is not a prerequisite for competent of the decision authority in the host Member State, the permanent withdrawal by the competent authority in the home Member State of the authorization the to profession shall automatically lead to being the temporarily or permanently prohibited from practising under his home- country professional title in the host Member State. concerned practise lawyer *) n Article 8 Salaried practice in a host registered lawyer A Member State home- his under country professional title may practise as a salaried lawyer in the employ of another lawyer, an association or firm of lawyers, or a public or private enterprise host where Member State so permits for lawyers registered under the professional title used in that State. the Article 9 Statement of reasons and remedies A lawyer registered in a host Member State under his home-country professional title may practise as a salaried lawyer in the employ of another lawyer, an association or firm of lawyers, or a public or private enterprise. Any Member State may exclude salaried lawyers in the employ of a public or private the activity of enterprise representation the in administration of justice for that enterprise, if lawyers established in the host Member State are not authorised to pursue that activity. from pursuing or defence registration Decisions not to effect the registration referred to in Article 3 or to cancel such decisions imposing disciplinary measures shall state the reasons on which they are based. and A remedy shall be available against such decisions before a court or tribunal the provisions of national law. in accordance with *Y Article 10 Integration Member State as a lawyer of the home under his 1. for lawyer pursued effectively Member State A practising home-country professional title who an has unbroken period of at least three years an activity involving thé law of the host including Community law shall, with a view to to his the gaining the host profession of there Member State and practising under title corresponding to the profession in that State, be exempted from any aptitude test which may be required under Article Directive 89/48/EEC. admission in lawyer professional 4(1 )(b) the of least under lawyer practising A his home-country professional title who has effectively pursued regularly for a period of at three years an activity involving the law of the host Member State including Community law shall, with a view to his gaining admission to the profession of lawyer in and the host Member State practising there under the professional title corresponding to the profession in that State, be exempted from the conditions set out in Article 4(1 )(b) of Directive 89/48/EEC. It shall be for the lawyer concerned to furnish proof of such effective pursuit for an unbroken period of at least three years of an activity involving the law of the host Member State. To that end, he shall provide the competent authority in the host Member State with any relevant information and documentation, notably on the number of cases he has dealt with and their "Effective pursuit for an nature. unbroken actual exercise of the activity without any interruption other than that resulting from the events of everyday life. period" means It shall be for the lawyer concerned to furnish proof of such effective pursuit regularly for a period of at least three years of an activity involving the law of the host Member State. To that end, he shall provide the relevant competent authority in the host Member State and with documentation, notably on the number of cases he has dealt with and their nature. "Effective and regular pursuit " means actual exercise of any interruption other than that resulting from the. events of everyday life. activity without information relevant any the 2^ in A lawyer practising under his home- country professional title who has effectively pursued for an unbroken three years a least period of at professional the host activity Member State may be required, in accordance with Article 4(1 )(b) of Directive 89/48/EEC only to take an aptitude test limited to the law of of procedure rules professional conduct of the host Member State. and the lawyer A under his practising home-country professional title may apply at any time during the five-year period referred to in Article 2 to have his diploma recognized pursuant to Directive 89/48/EEC with a view to gaining permanent admission to the profession of the host lawyer Member State and practising it under the professional title used in that State. in any attendance by When it examines an application, the competent authority shall take into account the applicant at lectures or seminars on the law of the host Member State, regulating including professional practice and conduct. rules the 2. A lawyer practising under his home-country professional title in a host Member State may, at any time, apply to have his diploma recognized in accordance with Directive 89/48/EEC with a view to gaining admission to the profession of lawyer in the host Member State and practising it under the professional title corresponding to the profession in that Member State. title, who has effectively 3. A lawyer practising under his home-country professional and regularly pursued a professional activity in the host Member State for a period of at least three years may obtain from the relevant competent authority of that State admission to the profession of lawyer in the host Member State and the right to practise it under the professional title corresponding to the profession in that host Member State, under the conditions and in accordance with the procedures set out below : (a) The relevant competent authority shall take into account the effective and regular professional activity pursued during the abovementioned period and any knowledge and professional experience of the law of the host Member State, and any attendance at lectures or seminars on the law of the host Member State, the rules regulating professional practice and conduct. including the relevant (b) The applicant shall provide competent authority with any relevant information and documentation, notably on the cases he has dealt with. The competent authority of the host the Member State may, information provided, require to undergo an interview. to verify the applicant in order the applicant 4. The relevant competent authority of the host Member State may, by reasoned decision subject to appeal under national law, refuse to allow these provisions, if it considers that this would not be in the public interest, notably because of disciplinary proceedings, or incidents of any kind. the benefit of complaints JUL. The representatives of the competent the authority the examination confidentiality of any information received. entrusted shall with preserve A lawyer who gains admission to the profession of the host in lawyer in accordance with Member State paragraphs 1 to 5 shall be entitled to use his home-country professional title, expressed in the official language or one of the official languages of his home the professional in the host Member State. title used alongside country, 5. The representatives of the relevant competent authority entrusted with consideration of the application shall preserve the confidentiality of any information received. 6. A lawyer who gains admission to the profession of lawyer in the host Member State in accordance with the above paragraphs shall be entitled to use his home-country professional title, expressed in the official language or one of the official languages of his home country, alongside the professional title corresponding to the profession of lawyer in the host Member State. 2* Article 11 Joint practice Where joint practice is permitted in the host Member State, in it must accordance with the following rules. take place Where joint practice is authorized in respect of lawyers carrying on their activities under the relevant professional in the host Member State, the following provisions shall apply in respect of lawyers wishing to carry on activities under that title or registering with in the relevant competent authority respect of that title. title 1) One or more lawyers who belong to the same grouping in their home Member State and who practise under their home-country professional title in a host Member State may pursue their professional activities in a branch or agency of their grouping in the host Member State. However, where the fundamental that grouping in the home Member State are incompatible with the fundamental rules laid down by law, regulation or administrative action the host Member State, the latter rules shall prevail far as compliance therewith is justified by the public interest in protecting clients and third parties. rules governing in so in 2K 2) professional Each Member State shall afford two or more lawyers from the same grouping or the same home Member State who practise in its territory under their titles home-country access to a form of joint practice. If the host Member State gives its lawyers a choice between several legal forms in which to practise, those same shall also be made legal available aforementioned the lawyers. The manner in which such lawyers practise jointly in the host Member State shall be governed by the and administrative provisions of that State. forms to regulations laws, 3) The host Member State shall take the measures necessary to permit joint practice also between : (a) several lawyers from different Member States practising under their home-country professional titles; (b) one or more lawyers covered by and one or more host the from- point (a) lawyers Member State. jointly The manner in which such lawyers practise host Member State shall be governed by the and administrative provisions of that State. regulations laws, the in 4) A lawyer who wishes to practise under title his home-country professional shall inform the competent authority in the host Member State of the fact that he is a member of a grouping in this home Member State and furnish any that grouping. information on relevant i°\ 5) which Notwithstanding points 1-4, a host prohibits Member State practice of the profession of lawyer within a grouping controlled by persons who are not members of the to allow a profession may refuse his lawyer under home-country professional to practise in its territory in his capacity as a member of his grouping if the decision-making that grouping is exercised preponderantly by persons who do not have the status of lawyer. registered power title in Article 12 Name of the grouping in which the manner lawyers Whatever practise under their home-country professional titles in the host Member State, they may employ the name of any grouping to which they belong in their home Member State. The host Member State may in addition to that name, mention be made of the legal form of the grouping in the home Member State and/or of the names of any members of the grouping practising in the host Member State. require that, which registered Notwithstanding points 1-4, a host prohibits Member State practice of the profession of lawyer within a grouping controlled by persons who are not members of the to allow a profession may refuse his lawyer under home-country professional to practise in its territory in his capacity as a member of his grouping if the capital of the grouping is held, the name under which it practises is used, or the decision-making power in that grouping is exercised, de facto or de jure, by persons who do not have the status of lawyer within the meaning of Article 1(2) of this Directive. title State home Member Where the fundamental rules governing a grouping of lawyers in are the incompatible with the rules in force in the host Member State or. with the provisions of the first subparagraph of this point, the host Member State may oppose the opening of a branch or agency within its territory without the restrictions laid down in Article 11(1). 5) 2>o Article 13 Cooperation authorities between the competent in the home and host Member States In order to facilitate the application of this Directive and to prevent its provisions from being misapplied for the sole purpose of circumventing the rules applicable in the host Member State, the competent authority in the host Member State competent authority in the home Member State shall collaborate closely and afford each other mutual assistance. They shall preserve the confidentiality they the exchange. information and the of Article 14 Designation of the competent authorities for the Member States shall designate, within the in Article 15, period provided competent authorities empowered to receive the applications and to take the decisions referred to in this Directive. They shall communicate this information to the other Member States and to the Commission. %\ laws, regulations Member States shall-bring into force the and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 31 December shall immediately inform the Commission thereof. 1997. They Article 15 Implementation laws, regulations Member States shall bring into force the and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 31 December shall immediately inform the Commission thereof. 1996. They these When Member States adopt provisions, these shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference at the time of their official publication. The procedure for such reference shall be adopted by Member States. 2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the texts of the main provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive. 32- J Article 16 Entry into force This Directive shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the European Communities. the Official Journal of Article 17 Addressees This Directive Member States is addressed to the Done at Brussels, For the European Parliament For the Council The President The President 3>i ISSN 0254-1475 COM(96) 446 final DOCUMENTS EN 10 Catalogue number : CB-CO-96-454-EN-C ISBN 92-78-08793-9 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg *Y


title: KOMISSION ASETUS (EY) N:o 1840/96, annettu 24 päivänä syyskuuta 1996, tiettyjä maitotuotteita koskevien vientitodistusten antamisen väliaikaisesta keskeyttämisestä ja käsiteltävänä olevien vientitodistushakemusten hyväksyttävyydestä

eurovoc_concepts:
cheese
common organisation of markets
export licence
export restriction
restriction on competition


title: ΓΡΑΠΤΗ ΕΡΩΤΗΣΗ αρ θ. 2580/96 του Antonios TRAKATELLIS προς την Επ τροπή. Περικοπές στην ανθρωπιστική βοήθεια υπέρ των Υπερκαυκασίων χωρών

eurovoc_concepts:
EU financing
USSR
aid policy
aid programme
aid to disadvantaged groups
financing of aid
humanitarian aid
non-governmental organisation

formats: html print


title: VINGTIEME RAPPORT ANNUEL D'ACTIVITE DU COMITE CONSULTATIF POUR LA SECURITE, L'HYGIENE ET LA PROTECTION DE LA SANTE SUR LE LIEU DE TRAVAIL - Année 1995

eurovoc_concepts:
advisory committee (EU)
occupational health
occupational safety
research programme
workplace

text: COMMISSION DES COMMUNAUTES EUROPEENNES Bruxelles, le 24. 09. 1996 COM(96) 458 final VINGTIEME RAPPORT ANNUEL D'ACTIVITE DU COMITE CONSULTATIF POUR LA SECURITE, L'HYGIENE ET LA PROTECTION DE LA SANTE SUR LE LIEU DE TRA VAIL - Année 1995 - (Présenté par la Commission) SOMMAIRE I) Généralités II) Avis rendus III) Activités des GAHs. IV) Annexes A) B) C) Liste des membres Organisation des groupes ad hoc Fondements juridiques 1/ I. GENERALITES A) Composition du Comité. Depuis le 1er janvier 1995 un certain nombre de changement sont intervenus dans le composition du Comité, notamment suite à l'entrée de nouveaux Etats membres. Tous ces changements sont repris dans la liste des membres du comité, (voir annexe A) B) Structures 6 groupes ad hoc ont exercé leurs activités (voir annexe B, organisation des GAH 1995) le groupe "Organisation" a tenu 3 réunions durant cet exercice. C) Nombre de réunions. Durant l'exercice 1995, le Comité s'est réuni trois fois en séance plénière, et ses groupes ad hoc ont tenu 12 réunions. D) 19ème rapport d'activité du CCSHS fDoc. 92/1/95 VK) The Committee approved the report on 31 May 1995, subject to the submission of written comments within one month of the meeting. H) AVIS RENDUS Les commentaires concernant les projets d'avis cités ci-dessous sont des extraits des rapports présentés à la plénière. 1) Normalisation (Doc. 6222/94) Le Comité a adopté un projet d'avis concernant un mandat de normalisation pour lefComité Européen de Normalisation (CEN) sur les spécifications et les fluides hydrauliques difficilement conditions d* essai applicables aux inflammables utilisés pour la transmission de puissance (hydrostatique et hydrocinétique). 3 Le Comité admet la nécessité de donner un mandat de normalisation au CEN dans ce domaine, car les fluides hydrauliques font partie des machines couvertes par la directive 89/392/CEE (J. O. L183/9 du 29. 6. 89). Ce mandat doit se référer à la directive "machines" ainsi qu'aux directives 67/598/CEE (J. O. L196/1 du 16. 8. 67 modifiée en dernier lieu par la directive 94/69 CEE - J. O. L381/1 du 31. 12. 94), 88/379/CEE (J. O. L187 du 16. 7. 88 modifiée en dernier lieu par la directive 93/18 CEE - J. O. L104/46 du 29. 4. 93) et 92/32/CEE (J. O. L154 du 5. 6. 92) sur la classification, l'emballage et l'étiquetage des substance et préparations dangereuses. Le Comité souhaite un projet de mandat plus spécifique qui indiquerait clairement quel type de travail est demandé au CEN et préciserait notamment la signification des termes "spécifications-exigences" au chapitre 6. 2) GAH "Recherche" 2. 1 Projet d'avis sur les critères relatifs aux projets de recherche au titre du 4ème programme cadre "Recherche, développeent technologique et démonstration" 1994-1998) (Doc. 93/1/95): Le comité consultatif estime extrêmement importants les points suivants : 1. 2. 3. Des appels à propositions en matière de sécurité, hygiène et santé doivent être publiés. Ces appels pourraient s'inspirer de programmes spécifiques dans lesquels l'amélioration des conditions de travail est prise en compte, en particulier les programmes spécifiques relatifs aux thèmes suivants: technologies industrielles et technologies des matériaux, normalisation, mesures et essais, biomédecine et santé, recherche socio-économique finalisée. Les propositions de recherche doivent établir clairement quelles améliorations positives de la sécurité, de l'hygiène et de la santé au travail sont attendues des recherches et comment ces améliorations peuvent être mises en pratique par les employeurs et les travailleurs. Cette exigence est tout spécialement pertinente dans le cas de nouvelles technologies. Les propositions de recherche relatives au 4ème Programme cadre doivent être sélectionnées en tenant compte de l'amélioration prévisible de la sécurité et de la santé au travail. 4 En vue d'élaborer des programmes spécifiques en hygiène et sécuritédans le cadre des travaux préparatoires du 5ème Programme RDT, le Comité demande d'urgence à la Commission de présenter au Groupe ad hoc, lors de sa prochaine réunion, l'inventaire des thèmes des programmes spécifiques adoptés dans le cadre du 4ème Programme RDT dans lesquels peuvent être insérés les sujets de recherche privilégiés indiqués dans le § II. 3 de l'avis adopté à la réunion plénière de novembre 1994. Le comité émet un avis favorable moyennant les rectifications demandées par les groupes Employeurs et Gouvernementaux : insertion après le point 3 de la page 2 du sous-titre : "III Besoin d'informations" suppression de la note 2 au bas de la page 2 et rajout, dans le 2ème alinéa du Point 1 de la même page du texte suivant : "De tels programmes, quels qu'ils soient, ne peuvent être réalisés qu'à l'aide d'informations précises concernant les besoins et la nature des projets existants dans ce domaine. " 2. 2 Propositions en vue de recherches urgentes à l'appui de politiques communautaires Doc. 470/95 : Le comité consultatif considère qu'il s'agit là d'un domaine important qui mérite la plus grande attention. Cependant, il existe d'autres éléments essentiels liés à l'absorption cutanée, qui doivent être couverts par d'autres composantes du quatrième programme cadre. Cette proposition d'appel ciblé pour des projets de recherche concernant l'exposition cutanée sur le lieu de travail devrait être coordonnée avec des thèmes similaires élaborés par d'autres services de la Commission ou d'autres institutions. La version finale de la proposition devrait être plus clairement axée sur l'évaluation des techniques de mesure, laquelle pourrait ultérieurement d'aboutir à l'élaboration de méthodes normalisées. Dans un premier temps, il conviendrait de s'attacher à l'exposition cutanée aux solvants, qui posent un problème majeur sur le lieu de travail. Le comité émet un avis favorable sous réserve d'expliciter davantage les problèmes qui doivent faire l'objet de la recherche. (réserve émise par le groupe Employeurs). ^ m) ACTmTES PES gROVFES AP HOC Travaux en cours 1) Groupe ad hoc "Recherche". Le groupe est chargé: a) b) c) d'établir un inventaire des programmes soutenus par la Commission; d'attirer l'attention de la Commission sur les domaines dans lesquels l'acquisition de connaissances nouvelles et la mise en oeuvre d'actions appropriées de recherche apparaissent nécessaires; d'établir les priorités pour la recherche dans le cadre du 4ème programme d'action. Ce GAH a fait l'objet d'une confirmation de mandat lors de la plénière de février 1995. Sur proposition du groupe Employeurs, l'alinéa (c) est précisé comme suit (c) d'établir des priorités pour la recherche dans le cadre : des recommandations du CCSHS relatives aux programmes de sécurité et de santé; du 4ème programme d'actions pour la santé et la sécurité; du 5ème programme de recherche et de développement. 2) Groupe ad hoc "Stress lié au travail". Ce groupe doit rechercher a) b) c) d) tous travaux faisant autorité et se rapportant au stress; toute action qui a déjà été effectuée au niveau national ou communautaire; tout problème que peut poser le stress au travail, et faire rapport de ces recherches au CCSHS en vue d'une action future. Les sujets abordés lors de la réunion de mai sont exposés comme suit à la plénière de mai 1995 : trouver une définition du stress lié au travail en tenant compte uniquement des éléments sur lesquels les employeurs et les travailleurs peuvent agir, faire un inventaire des pratiques en vigueur dans les Etas-membres. 3) Groupe ad hoc "Alcool et drogue sur le lieu de travail". Ce groupe est chargé: d'examiner le projet de rapport d'une étude en cette matière, effectuée conjointement par l'OIT et la Commission dans les Etats-membres de la Communauté européenne, en coopération étroite avec les partenaires sociaux, en analysant spécialement l'impact de ce problème sur l'ensemble de la santé et de la sécurité sur le lieu de travail, de proposer à l'Assemblée plénière un projet d'avis sur ce rapport ainsi que des recommandations d'actions à entreprendre le cas échéant par la Commission dans ce domaine. de soumettre à l'Assemblée plénière des propositions concernant la représentation des partenaires sociaux (quatre par état-membre) à une conférence qui sera organisée par la Commission et au cours de laquelle seront présentés les résultats du rapport ainsi que les divers rapports nationaux. 4) Groupe ad hoc "Normalisation". Le mandat de ce groupe est l'objet d'un projet de modification exposé comme suit dans l'annexe II du compte-rendu de la plénière de février 95 : "Dans son avis du 4 juillet 1994 sur le Mémorandum sur la normalisation dans le domaine de l'Article 118A du Traité CEE, le CCSHS a déclaré que les décisions sur les niveaux d'exposition aux agents nocifs devraient être prises au niveau politique. Le CCSHS réitère son avis. Toute norme mandatée devrait être limitée à des questions de mesures techniques et tout mandat devrait exclure la possibilité que des comités de normalisation puissent jouer un rôle quelconque dans l'établissement de niveaux d'expositions humaines. " 1 La réunion du 7. 04. 95 a traité de deux sujets : les accords de Vienne entre le CEN et l'ISO (possibilité d'influence sur la normalisation) la norme européenne 50166 (valeurs limites d'exposition relative aux champs électromagnétiques) 5) Groupe ad hoc "Etablissement des niveaux d'expositions sur le lieu de travail". Le but de ce groupe est : d'être consulté sur les priorités à arrêter en ce qui concerne les substances pour lesquelles les niveaux d'exposition professionnelle devraient être déterminés; de fournir un avis sur les procédures à suivre pour la collecte des données nécessaires pour l'établissement des niveaux d'exposition sur le lieu de travail; d'être régulièrement et pleinement informé des travaux réalisés par la Commission dans le cadre de l'élaboration de propositions concernant l'établissement de niveaux d'exposition sur le lieu de travail; le groupe ad hoc sera notamment informé de manière régulière sur les travaux réalisés par le groupe d'experts scientifiques; d'élaborer un projet d'avis sur les propositions de la Commission relatives à l'établissement des niveaux d'exposition sur le lieu de travail; de faire rapport à intervalles réguliers sur l'état d'avancement de ses travaux lors des réunions plénières du Comité consultatif. 6) Groupe ad hoc "Audio-visuel". Le but de ce groupe est de définir et préciser au Comité consultatif les actions communautaires susceptibles d'être organisées par la Commission se rapportant à la création et à la mise en place des moyens nécessaires à la réalisation des objectifs retenus par la Commission sur base du rapport adopté par le Comité consultatif le 19 novembre 1993. i Les objectifs assignés à la réalisation du deuxième festival du film étaient les suivants : promotion de l'audiovisuel en tant qu'outil de promotion; approfondissement de la réflexion pour concevoir et améliorer les produits pour les utilisateurs et spectacteurs; recherche de synergies susceptibles de faciliter les échanges, les adaptations, voire les coproductions entre plusieurs pays. De nouvelles actions sont envisagées dans le cadre du Programme d'Actions notamment action numéro 2 "Actions non législatives d'information, d'éducation et de formation, il est prévu l'organisation d'un 3ème festival. 7) Groupe ad hoc "Procédures opérationnelles du CCSHS" Dans le cadre des obligations et responsabilités attribuées au Comité consultatif pour la sécurité, l'hygiène et la protection de la santé sur le lieu de travail par le Conseil dans sa décision de juin 1974 et eu égard à l'obligation de la Commission de consulter les partenaires sociaux, le GAH est chargé d'identifier tous les obstacles, en particulier - administratifs, financiers ou de procédure - qui entravent le fonctionnement efficace et effectif du Comité consultatif, et de recommander des solutions appropriées. La première réunion s'est déroulée le 20 décembre 1995. Création de nouveaux groupes ad hoc 1) GAH "Procédures opérationnelles du Comité Consultatif 2) GAH "4ème programme d'actions" 3) GAH "Hauts responsables de l'inspection du travail" Dissoltitiop de groupes ad hQÇ 1) GAH "Agents biologiques" 2) GAH "Information aux entreprises et aux travailleurs" Discussions générales 1) Workprogramme BIOMED 2. Les commentaires des groupes d'intérêt sur ce programme étaient inscrits à l'ordre du jour de la plénière de septembre 1995 mais n'ont pas été abordés ce jour-là. 2) Transposition des directives. Pour répondre au souhait des partenaires sociaux, la plénière du comité consultatif de juillet 1994 a demandé que soit élaboré un document synthétique retraçant les modalités de transposition, dans les différents Etats de la Communauté européenne, de la directive 89/391 "santé/sécurité au travail" du 12 juin 1989, dite "directive-cadre". La constitution d'un groupe ad hoc composé de représentants gouvernementaux a donc été décidée par le comité en plénière des 16 et 17 février 1995, en vue de préparer une réponse collective destinée à la séance plénière des 30 et 31 mai 1995. Le groupe ad hoc s'est réuni le 8 mars et le 3 mai 1995. Les partenaires sociaux ont exprimés leur insatisfaction envers le document présenté par le groupe Gouvernementaux qui devait préparer un nouveau rapport portant uniquement sur la directive 89/391. Ce document devait décrire les modalités de transposition de cette directive dans les différents Etats-membres. Ce document n'a pas satisfait les partenaires sociaux : les questions soulevées ont porté essentiellement sur la non-transposition par certains états-membres et sur le contrôle de la conformité des transpositions. Les représentants de la Commission rappellent que la vérification de la conformité de la transposition revient à la Commission et qu'elle ne peut communiquer de renseignements particuliers tant que ce travail n'est pas terminé. La décision a été prise de préparer les avis des 3 groupes pour la réunion en juillet 95 du Comité d'organisation. Jo A la plénière de septembre 1995, le groupe Gouvernementaux déclare souhaiter maintenir le document 469/2/95, qui exprime une position commune entre Etats- membres. Le président rappelle qu'un Etat-membre n'a pas encore transposé; pour tous les autres la Commission examine les textes pour vérifier leur conformité. Le processus n'est pas terminé. 3) Deuxième festival européen du film de sensibilisation et de formation en sécurité et santé sur le lieu de travail. Une décision a été prise de tenir le festival du film à Strasbourg du 26 au 28 juin 1995. 4) Etat d'avancement des projets de directives. 4. 1 Directive 89655 "Equipements de travail". Ce projet a été considéré comme prioritaire par la présidence française. 4. 2 Autres directives santé et sécurité : pas d'initiatives de la Présidence 5) Agence Européenne pour la santé et la sécurité. Par rapport aux discussions de 1994, la modification du règlement de l'Agence a été proposée au Conseil pour tenir compte de l'adhésion des nouveaux Etats- membres et porte sur la composition et le fonctionnement du Conseil d'Administration : (à l'origine la composition du Conseil d'adminsitration était la suivante : 12 Gouv. , 6 Empl. et 6 Trav. ) 48 membres, à raison de 15 représentants des Etats-membres, 15 représentants des organisations d'employeurs, 15 représentants des organisations de travailleurs et 3 représentants de la Commission. élimination du système de rotation au sein du Conseil d'Administration. mandat renouvelable pour tous les membres. réunion du Conseil d'Administration deux fois par an et à la demande de la moitié de ses membres. les membres représentant les gouvernements des Etats-membres disposent de deux voix chacun. J* Le Parlement Européen a donné son avis sur les modifications et a proposé trois amendements :. * * * Une forte opposition au principe du double vote. La Commission est contre cet amendement et ne proposera pas de modification au Conseil. Restreindre la confidentialité qui devrait être limitée à des cas individuels. La Commission a estimé que cet amendement n'était pas opportun et que c'est le bureau qui doit se préoccuper de ce problème. Donner la possibilité aux partenaires sociaux d'être représentés par des partenaires sociaux d'un autre pays. La Commission a également dit non à cet amendement. Le principe du double-vote pour les représentants gouvernementaux a été vivement critiqué par les partenaires sociaux, qui y voient un moyen de réduire leur rôle à une consultation honorifique, les décisions revenant en dernier lieu aux gouvernementaux. Néanmoins ils se déclarent satisfaits de la représentation des partenaires sociaux, à savoir 1 employeur et 1 travailleur pour chacun des 15 états-membres. Le règlement modifié a été adopté le 29 juin 1995 par décision du Conseil (J. O. L156/1 du 7. 7. 95). La première réunion du Conseil d'Administration de l'Agence s'est tenue à Bilbao les 25 et 26 octobre 1995. 6) Programme de la Commission des Communautés Européennes dans le domaine de la sécurité, hygiène et santé au travail (1996-2000 V Une première présentation du projet de dossier a été présentée par la Commission lors de la plénière de mai 1995. Le document final COM(95)282 est présenté lors de la plénière de septembre 1995. Les commentaires qu'a appelle ce document peuvent être consultés dans le rapport de la réunion. JÛS Les discussions ont essentiellement portées sur le rôle de consultation du CCSHS, par rapport à la création de nouveaux comités comme celui prévu pour le contrôle budgétaire du 4ème programme d'action, et par rapport à l'élaboration de mesures législatives et non-législatives; la nécessité de clarifier les relations entre l'Agence, la Fondation et le CCSHS; la possibilité pour le GAH "4ème programme d'action" chargé d'évaluer ce document de le faire dans les délais suffisants; les moyens financiers alloués à d'autres comités comparés au budget du CCSHS. 7) Thèmes d'intérçt général Mlle Jenny Bacon, Directeur général adjoint au Health and Safety Executive, a présenté, lors de la séance plénière du 17 février 1995, un rapport intitulé "Étude de la réglementation". Cette analyse globale de la législation britannique relative à la santé et la sécurité sur le lieu de travail, réalisée par la Commission santé et sécurité, a été publiée en mai 1994. w. Amuses A) B) C) Liste des membres du CCSHS Liste des membres des différents groupes ad hoc Fondements juridiques J3> ANNEXE A LISTE DES MEMBRES DU COMITE CONSULTATIF POUR LA SECURITE, L'HYGIENE ET LA PROTECTION DE LA SANTE SUR LE LIEU DE TRAVAIL GOUVERNEMENTAUX Pays Autriche Belgique Allemagne Danemark Espagne France Grèce Ireland Italie Luxembourg Pays-Bas Portugal Suède Finlande Royaume-Uni Titulaires Suppléants Dr FINDING Dr JENNER M. RZONZEF M. STEEN Herr RIESE Herr GIESEN Mrs SKJOLDAGER Mrs STEFFENSEN Mme G. DEL CASTILLO D. CASTELLA M. ROBERT M. PASQUIER M. TANGAS Mrs PISSIMISSI M. FUREY M. DONNELLAN Sig. ALVINO Dort. GUERRIERI M. FEYEREISEN M. DEMUTH Dr WAGEMAKER M. MEPPELDER Sr. CASTELO BRANCO Sra PINTO MARVAO Prof. KILBOM Mr BARREFELT Mr KALLIO MrRANTANEN Ms DEAKINS Ms SOAVE Dr SZYMANSKI Dr BREINDL M. HESELMANS M. HUBLET Frau STREFFER Herr OPFERMANN Mr J. ANDERSEN Mr N O. ANDERSEN D. CHOZAS PEDRERO D. GOMEZ-HORTIGUELA Mme GUIGUEN M. BOISNEL M. KOUMERTAS Mrs KAFETZOPOULOU M. HENRY M. WALSH Dottssa FAVENTI Dott. ssa ROCCA M. WEBER M. RUME Dr VOS Dr DEN HELD DrDURÂO Sr. COSTA MARINHO MrMAHL MrBYLUND Mr HURMALAINEN Mr LAMBERG Mr TANSLEY MDr McQUAID JH EMPLOYEURS Pavs Autriche Belgique Allemagne Danemark Espagne France Grèce Ireland Italie Luxembourg Pays-Bas Portugal Suède Finlande Royaume-Uni Titulaires Suppliants Frau SCHWENG Herr BRAUNER M. DE LANGE M. LEONARD Herr KUHLMANN Herr JANISZEWSKI Mr JEPSEN Mr NIELSEN D. MANZANO SANZ D. SANCHIS AHUYO M. TASSANT M. PEYRICAL Mr TSAMOUSSOPOULOS MrZIMALIS Mr BRISCOE Mr TUMULTY Sig. GIUSTI Dott. FREGOSO M. SAUBER Dr METZLER De heer VAN OSTAIJEN Mw DE MEESTER Sr. LIMA AMORIM Sr. COSTA TAVARES Mr FROSTLING MrLIND MrKUIKKO MrLINDAHL Mr CASTLE Dr ASHERSON Herr DUNGL Herr STRIMTTZER M. PELEGRIN M. DILLEN Herr BEEKHUIZEN Dr KREIZBERG Mrs K0LVING Mr S0RENSEN D. BELTRAN APARICIO D. MUNOZ MUGICA Dr AUBRUN MmeCORMAN MrKALDIS Mr VGONTAS Mr LAWLOR Mr CASSIDY Sig. ROVIGLIONI Sr. SPANO Dr BOLLENDORF M. LANG Mw HOPMANS De heer VERHOEF Sr. BARROSO Sr. TEVES COSTA Mr HOLMGREN MrHAGMAN Mr AHTELA Ms LUOMALA Mr CLARE Mr HUGHES ^ TMVAM4ÎVRS Eays Autriche Belgique Allemagne Danemark Espagne France Grèce Irlande Italie Luxembourg Pays-Bas Portugal Suède Finlande Royaume-Uni Titulaires Frau SARRESCHTEDHARI- LEODOLTER Herr HEIDER M. FONCK Mme CYPRES Herr KONSTANTY Herr ANGERMAIER Mr POULSEN M. MALTESEN D. CARCOBA DDIAZ M. PICHENOT M. MARTIN Mr POLITIS Mr DRIVAS Mr WALL MrCRONIN Sigra BRIGHI Sigra BENEDETTINI M. MILLER M. GIARDIN De heer CREMERS De heer WELDERS Sr. SARAMAGO Sr. GOMES TAVARES Mr TENGBERG Mrs BREIDENSJÔ Mr METSÀMÀKI Ms TYÔLÂJÀRVI Mr BIBBINGS Ms GIBSON Suppléants Frau CZESKLEBA Herr SCHRAMHAUSER M. PHILIPS M. VAN DER HAEGEN Herr GROWITSCH Herr SWINGMANN M. N0RSKOV M. HEEGAARD Dfta FERNANDEZ D. ARROYO M. SEDES M. LEMÎTRES Mr PAPANAYOTOU Dr CHATZIS Mr O'HALLORAN Mr O'NEILL Dort. TASCINI Dottssa GALLI M. ABATTI M. MERSCH De heer MULLER De heer SPRENGER Sr. SANTOS NEVES Sr. ALMEIDA TEDŒIRA Mrs THULESTEDT Mr LAVENIUS MsHEDCURA Mr SAARIKANGAS Mr MELLISH Mr PICKERING ^Àk ANNEXES LISTE DES GAH 1995 STRESS ALCOOL ET DROGUE NORMALISATION RECHERCHE Président : Vice-président : Rapporteur : MPOULSEN M. VAN DER POEL M DE LANGE M. GR7STI M MELLISH / UK M. DONNELLY / IRL GOUVERNEMENTAUX EMPLOYEURS TRAVAILLEURS VAN DER POEL / NE ANDERSEN / DA DAVIES / UK WALSH / IRL HUBLET / BE KUHN/DE GREIF / DE DE LANGE / BE DE MEESTER / NE JEPSEN / DA AUBRUN / FR DE LIEDEKERKE / UNICE GUEANT / BTS POULSEN / DA GADEA / ES TIVEY/UK WILDERS / NE LENERT / AUT BREIDENSJÔ / S HUBLET / BE MUSCH / DE RUME/LUX DONNELLY / IRL M ANGERMAIER M GAMBELLI TOMKINS / UK O VERG AARD / DA WAMPACH / BE BARZ/DE REMAEUS / S GR7STI / IT DE LA BATIE / FR SCHULTHEISS / DE M C D O N A LD / UK BORMANS / UNICE GAMBELLI/FR GIUSTI / IT JANISZEWSKI / DE BORMANS /UNICE LIND/S GALLI / IT DIAZ/ES MELLISH/UK DRIJFHOUT / NE BUSCHAK / CES HASSELBACH / DA ANGERMAIER / DE GALLI / IT SAPIR / BTS MELLISH / UK Mme CORMAN MSHEYE Mme BRIGHI DenHeld/NE LOWE/UK SHEYE/DA BIENECK / DE HUBLET /BE HURMALAINEN/S THORLEY / UK CASANO / IT CORMAN/FR BORMANS/ UNICE MALTESEN / DA MARTIN/FR BRIGHI / IT SARAMAGO/PO SAPIR / BTS MANDAT voir document "Mandats" voir document "Mandats" Examen des propositions de normes demandées par la CCE au CEN/CENELEC voir document "Mandats" Fonctionnaire responsable Dr. ALVAREZ V/F/5 Tel. 34547 M BERLIN V/F/ Tel. 32724 MLOMMEL V/F/4 Tel. 33871 M BERLIN V/F Tel. 32724 | A s i- Président : Vke-présideïit : Rapporteur : GOUVERNEMENTAUX EMPLOYEURS TRAVAILLEURS MANDAT Fouciioiiuaire responsable NIVEAUX EXPOSITIONS M HUBLET M. BEEKHUIZEN MHEEGAARD METHODE DE FONCTIONNEMENT DU CCSHS BYLUND / S WARNER / UK GUERRIERI / IT KLEIN / DE HUBLET/ BE HURMALAINEN / SU SOAVE/UK BYLUND/S SHEYE / DA PISSIMISSI / GR BOISNEL / FR BEEKHUIZEN / DE AUBRUN / FR JEPSEN / DA VERHOEF / NE LEWIS / UK GRAMPELLA / IT BORMANS / UNICE MALASPINA / IT SUCH / ES KONSTANTY / DE HEEGAARD / DA VANDAMME/BTS MARTIN /FR voir document "Mandats" CORMAN/FR FROSTLING / S GR7STI / rr ASHERSON / UK KUHLMAN / DE DE LIEDEKERKE / UNICE KONSTANTY / DE POULSEN / DA CARCOBA/ES SEDES / FR FONCK / BE CARLSLUND / CES voir document "Mandats" E. ROTHER / 32268 C. LAFFUT / 32739 V/F/4 u% ANNEXEC I» FffBtfqngntt Juridiques Décision du Conseil du 27 juin 1974, relative à la création d'un Comité Consultatif pour la sécurité, l'hygiène et la protection de la santé sur le lieu de travail (extraits) : "Le Conseil des Communautés Européennes (. ) considérant qu'il convient de prévoir un organisme permanent chargé d'assister la Commission dans la préparation et la mise en oeuvre des activités dans le domaine de la sécurité, de l'hygiène et de la protection de la santé sur le lieu de travail, et de faciliter la coopération entre les administrations nationales et les organisations syndicales de travailleurs et d'employeurs. DECIDE aricle premier : Il est institué un Comité Consultatif pour la sécurité, l'hygiène et la protection de la santé sur le lieu de travail. article 2 : Le comité est chargé d'assister la Commission dans la préparation et la mise en oeuvre des activités dans les domaines de la sécurité, de l'hygiène et de la protection de la santé sur le lieu de travail. article 3 : 1 - Le Comité établit annuellement un rapport d'activités; 2 - La Commission transmet ce rapport au Parlement Européen, au Conseil, au Comité Economique et Social et au Comité Consultatif de la Communauté Européenne du Charbon et de l'Acier". M ISSN 0254-1491 COM(96) 458 final DOCUMENTS FR 05 04 N° de catalogue : CB-CO-96-467-FR-C ISBN 92-78-08937-0 Office des publications officielles des Communautés européennes L-2985 Luxembourg Jv


title: Ehdotus neuvoston asetukseksi (EY) yhteisön menettelystä eläinlääkejäämien enimmäismäärien vahvistamiseksi eläinperäisissä elintarvikkeissa annetun neuvoston asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2377/90 liitteen II muuttamisesta

eurovoc_concepts:
animal product
food inspection
sea fish
veterinary drug
veterinary legislation

text: EUROOPAN YHTEISÖJEN KOMISSIO •ir -6e Bryssel, 24. 09. 1996 KOM(96) 34 lopull. Ehdotus NEUVOSTON ASETUKSEKSI (EY) yhteisön menettelystä eläinlääkejäämien enimmäismäärien vahvistamiseksi eläinperäisissä elintarvikkeissa annetun neuvoston asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2377/90 liitteen II muuttamisesta (komission esittämä) PERUSTELUT A. Lainsäädäntö Komission tehtävänä on 26 päivänä kesäkuuta 1990 annetun neuvoston asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2377/901 mukaisesti eläinlääkejäämien enimmäismäärät eläinperäisissä elintarvikkeissa. Eläinlääkejäämien enimmäismäärät (jäljempänä jälkeen sääntelykomiteamenettelyä noudattaen, minkä jälkeen komitea suosittelee kunkin aineen luokittelemista yhteen mainitun asetuksen liitteistä: 'JEM') vahvistetaan eläinlääkekomitean tieteellisen arvioinnin oikeudellisesti vahvistaa sitovat Liite I: aineet, joille voidaan vahvistaa JEM niiden aiheuttamien toksikologisten vaarojen arvioinnin perusteella ihmisten terveydelle Liite H: aineet, joille ei ole tarpeen vahvistaa JEM:ää Liite DI: aineet, joille ei ole voida riittävien tieteellisten tietojen puuttuessa vahvistaa pysyvää JEM:ää mutta joille voidaan kuluttajien terveyttä vaarantamatta määritellä väliaikainen JEM loppuun saattamisen vaatimaksi ajaksi tutkimusten tieteellisten Liite IV: aineet, joille näyttää olevan mahdotonta vahvistaa JEM, sillä ne muodostavat vaaran kuluttajien terveydelle annoksesta riippumatta EYVL N:o L 224,18. 8. 1990, s. 1 B. Tieteellinen arviointi Komissio on antanut luonnoksen asetukseksi (IH/5425/95) asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2377/90 liitteen muuttamisesta muun muassa somatosalmin sisällyttämiseksi mainittuun liitteeseen. 2 Mainittu luonnos annettiin eläinlääkekomitean mainittua ainetta koskevan tieteellisen arvioinnin jälkeen. on kuuluu Somatosalmi somatotropiineihin. Eläinlääkekomitea suositteli somatosalmin, kun sitä on tarkoitus antaa nuorille lohille, lisäämistä mainitun asetuksen liitteeseen II seuraavista syistä: bioteknologisella prosessilla tuotettu aine, joka somatosalmi on proteiini, jolla on erittäin lyhyt puoliintumisaika (> 30 min) kalan elimistössä aine annetaan vaikuttavan aineen kertainjektiona 1-2 vuotta ennen kalan tappamista. Luonnos dihydrostreptomysiiniä, genamysiiniä ja neomysiiniä, joille on vahvistettu JEM erikseen. koskee myös viittä muuta atsametifoosia, ainetta eli streptomysiiniä, C. Sääntelykomiteamenettely in asian käsittely neuvostossa 1. 2. Komissio saattoi 16 päivänä lokakuuta 1995 eläinlääkkeitä koskevien direktiivien mukauttamista tekniikan kehitykseen käsittelevän komitean (sääntelykomitca) käsiteltäväksi somatosalmin sisällyttämisestä asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2377/90 liitteeseen II edellä mainituista syistä. asetukseksi muun muassa luonnoksen Sääntelykomitea ei antanut puoltavaa lausuntoa ehdotetuista toimenpiteistä. Neljä jäsenvaltiota vastusti somatosalmin sisällyttämistä yhteen asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2377/90 liitteistä sillä perustella, että neuvoston päätös naudan somatotropiinia (BST) koskevasta lykkäyksestä asetettaisiin "epäsuorasti" kyseenalaiseksi, jos toinen somatotropiini ilmestyisi yhteisön markkinoille. Tässä yhteydessä on pantava merkille, että toisaalta mainittu neuvoston lykkäys koskee ainoastaan naudan somatotropiinia eikä kaikkia somatotrooppisia aineita yleensä ja toisaalta eläinlääkekomitean arviointikertomuksesta (ja lääkeyhtiön toimittamista asiakirjoista) käy ilmi, ettei somatosalmia - päinvastoin kuin BST:tä - käytetä eläinten kasvun edistämiseen tai tuottavuuden lisäämiseen, vaan ainoastaan helpottamaan nuorien lohien sopeutumista makeasta vedestä meriveteen. Tämä ainoa käyttötarkoitus selittää somatosalmin erityisen antotavan, joka on vaikuttavan aineen kertainjektio 1-2 vuotta ennen kalan tappamista. lisäselvityksiä Komissio pyysi huhtikuussa 1996 tiettyjen somatosalmin luokitusta vastustaneiden jäsenvaltioiden edustajien esittämien perusteluiden huomioon ottamiseksi, minkä jälkeen eläinlääkekomitea arvioi mahdollisuuden käyttää väärin mainittua ainetta lohen ja muiden lajien kasvun edistäjänä. Komitean 28 päivänä kesäkuuta 1996 antama lausunto on yksiselitteinen: somatosalmi tehoaa ainoastaan loheen ja sen mahdollista käyttöä tämän lajin suorituskyvyn parantajaiia on pidettävä mahdottomana sen farmakologisten ominaisuuksien ja sen tehon takaavan antotavan vuoksi (ainetta on ruiskutettava suoraan jokaisen kalan mahaan). Komissio haluaa lisäksi korostaa, että JEM:n vahvistaminen mainitulle aineelle ei estä soveltamasta myöhemmin mahdollisesti tehtäviä päätöksiä, jos markkinoille saattamista koskevaa lupaa haetaan, jolloin tällainen päätös on yhteisön oikeuden mukaisesti -menettelyjen riippumattomien arviointiperusteiden perusteella. tehtävä ja Neuvoston päätös, tehty 10 päivänä helmikuuta 1992, naudan somatotropiinin (BST) markkinoille saattamisesta ja antamisesta tehdyn päätöksen 90/218/ETY muuttamisesta (EYVL N:o L 366, 31. 12. 1994) 3. toimenpiteet eläinlääkkeitä koskevien direktiivien Ehdotetut mukauttamista tekniikan kehitykseen käsittelevän komitean lausunnon mukaiset, joten komissio antaa neuvostolle ehdotuksen asetukseksi asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2377/90 8 artiklassa säädettyä menettelyä noudattaen. eivät ole Mainitun artiklan mukaisesti neuvostoa pyydetään hyväksymään ehdotetut toimenpiteet kolmen kuukauden kuluessa siitä, kun asia on tullut vireille neuvostossa. Ehdotus NEUVOSTON ASETUKSEKSI ŒY) yhteisön menettelystä eläinlääkejäämien enimmäismäärien vahvistamiseksi eläinperäisissä elintarvikkeissa annetun neuvoston asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2377/90 liitteen II muuttamisesta EUROOPAN UNIONIN NEUVOSTO, joka ottaa huomioon Euroopan yhteisön perustamissopimuksen, ottaa huomioon yhteisön menettelystä eläinlääkejäämien enimmäismäärien vahvistamiseksi eläinperäisissä elintarvikkeissa 26 päivänä kesäkuuta 1990 annetun neuvoston asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2377/90', sellaisena kuin se on viimeksi muutettuna komission asetuksella (EY) N:o 1433/962, ja erityisesti sen 6 ja 8 artiklan; ottaa huamioon komission ehdotuksen, sekä katsoo, että asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2377/90 mukaisesti, jäämien enimmäismäärät on vahvistettava asteittain kaikille farmakologisesti vaikuttaville aineille, joita käytetään yhteisössä elintarvikkeita tuottaville eläimille annettaviksi tarkoitetuissa eläinlääkkeissä, jäämien enimmäismäärät voidaan vahvistaa vasta, kun eläinlääkekomitea on tutkinut kaikki asianmukaiset tiedot kyseisen aineen jäämien turvallisuudesta eläinperäisten elintarvikkeiden kuluttajalle ja niiden vaikutuksesta elintarvikkeiden teolliseen jalostukseen, vahvistettaessa enimmäismääriä eläinperäisissä elintarvikkeissa oleville eläinlääkejäämille on tarpeen määritellä ne eläinlajit, joissa jäämiä voi esiintyä, sallitut pitoisuudet jokaiselle 1 2 EYVLN:oL224, 18. 08. 1990, s. I EY VL N:oL 184, 24. 07. 1996, s. 21 Somatosalm olisi lisättävä asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2377/90 liitteeseen II; olisi säädettävä tämän asetuksen voimaantuloa edeltävästä 60 päivän määräajasta, jotta jäsen valtiot voisivat tehdä tämän asetuksen säännösten huomioon ottamiseksi tarvittavat mukautukset kyseisten eläinlääkkeiden markkinoille saattamista koskeviin lupiin, jotka on myönnetty neuvoston direktiivin 81/851/ETY3, sellaisena kuin se on viimeksi muutettuna direktiivillä 93/40/ETY4, mukaisesti, ja neuvoston asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2377/90 8 artiklassa säädetyn menettelyn mukaisesti toteutettavia toimenpiteitä koskeva luonnos on esitetty eläinlääkealan kaupan teknisten esteiden poistamiseksi annettujen direktiivien mukauttamista tekniikan kehitykseen käsittelevän komitealle; kyseinen komitea ei ole voinut antaa lausuntoa, ja tämän vuoksi komissio on antanut neuvostolle ehdotuksen näistä toimenpiteistä, ja 3 4 EYVLN:oL317,6. 11. 1981,s. 1 EYVLN:oL 214, 24. 8. 1993, s. 31 ON ANTANUT TÄMÄN ASETUKSEN: 1 artikla Muutetaan asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2377/90 liiteet II tämän asetuksen liitteen mukaisesti. 2 artikla Tämä asetus tulee voimaan kuudentenakymmenentenä päivänä sen jälkeen, kun se on julkaistu Euroopan yhteisöjen virallisessa lehdessä. Tämä asetus on kaikilta osiltaan velvoittava ja sitä sovelletaan sellaisenaan* kaikissa jäsenvaltioissa. Tehty Brysselissä, Neuvosto puolesta T- A. 2. Muutetaan liite II seuraavasti Orgaaniset kemialliset yhdisteet Farmakologisesti vaikuttava/t aine/aineet 2. 68. Somatosalm Lohikalat UTTE Eläinlajit Muut määräykset 09 ISSN 1024-4492 KOM(96) 34 lopullinen ASIAKIRJAT FI 05 03 Luettelonumero : CB-CO-96-039-H-C ISBN 92-77-99952-7 Euroopan yhteisöjen virallisten julkaisujen toimisto L-2985 Luxemburg "1


title: Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1853/96 des Rates vom 24. September 1996 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 3088/95 über Maßnahmen zur Erhaltung und Bewirtschaftung der Fischbestände für Fischereifahrzeuge unter der Flagge Polens (1996)

eurovoc_concepts:
Poland
Sweden
catch quota
conservation of fish stocks
fishery management
fishing area

formats: html pdfa1b print


title: 96/568/CE, Euratom: Decisione del Consiglio del 24 settembre 1996 che nomina un membro del Comitato economico e sociale

eurovoc_concepts:
European Economic and Social Committee
France
appointment of staff


title: SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG nr. 2600/96 van Frédéric STRIBY aan de Commissie. Antidumping-wet

eurovoc_concepts:
EU law
anti-dumping duty
anti-dumping measure
price increase
raw material
textile fibre
textile industry
textile product


title: Verordening (EG) nr. 1837/96 van de Commissie van 24 september 1996 tot vaststelling, voor de periode 1996/1997, van de coëfficiënten voor in de vorm van Irish whiskey uitgevoerde granen

eurovoc_concepts:
Ireland
barley
cereals
export refund
ratio
spirits


title: 374 D 0325 : Beschluß des Rates vom 27. Juni 1974 zur Einsetzung eines Beratenden Ausschusses für Sicherheit, Arbeitshygiene und Gesundheitsschutz am Arbeitsplatz (74/325/EWG)(ABl.Nr L 185 vom 9.7.1974, S. 15).,374 D 0325 : Besluit van de Raad van 27 juni 1974 betreffende de oprichting van een raadgevend comité voor de veiligheid, de hygiëne en de gezondheidsbescherming op de arbeidsplaats (74/325/EEG)(PB nr.L 185 van 9.7.1974, blz. 15).,374 D 0325 : Council decision of 27 June 1974 on the setting up of an advisory committee on safety, hygiene and health protection at work(74/325/EEC)(OJ No L 185, 9.7.1974, p. 15).,374 D 0325 : Decisione del Consiglio del 27 giugno 1974 che istituisce un comitato consultivo per la sicurezza, l'igiene e la tutela della salute sul luogo di lavoro (74/325/CEE)(GU n. L 185 del 9.7.1974, pag. 15).,374 D 0325 : Decisión del Consejo de 27 de junio de 1974 relativa a la creación de un comité consultivo para la seguridad, la higiene y la protección de la salud en el centro de trabajo (74/325/CEE)(DO n̊ L 185 de 9.7.1974, p. 15)(EE 05, V 2, p. 27).,374 D 0325 : Decisão do Conselho de 27 de junho de 1974 relativa à criação de um comité consultivo para a segurança, higiene e protecção da saúde no local de trabalho (74/325/CEE)(JO n̊ L 185 de 9.7.1974, p. 15)(EE 05 F2, p. 27).,374 D 0325 : Décision du Conseil du 27 juin 1974 relative à la création d'un comité consultatif pour la sécurité, l'hygiène et la protection de la santé sur le lieu de travail (74/325/CEE)(JO n̊ L 185 du 9.7.74, p. 15).,374 D 0325 : Neuvoston päätös, tehty 27 päivänä kesäkuuta 1974, työturvallisuuden, työhygienian ja työterveyshuollon neuvoa-antavan komitean perustamisesta(74/325/ETY)(EYVL N:o L 185, 9.7.1974, s. 15)(EP. 05/NIDE 01, s. 175).,374 D 0325 : Rådets afgørelse af 27. juni 1974 om nedsættelse af et rådgivende udvalg for sikkerhed, hygiejne og sundhedsbeskyttelse på arbejdsplasen (74/325/EØF)(EFT nr. L 185 af 9.7.1974, s. 15).,374 D 0325 : Rådets beslut av den 27 juni 1974 om inrättande av en rådgivande kommitté för arbetarskyddsfrågor (74/325/EEG)(EGT nr. L 185, 9.7.1974, s. 15)(SU 5/VOL. 1, s. 175).,374 D 0325 : Απόφαση του Συμβουλίου της 27ης Ιουνίου 1974 περί συστάσεως συμβουλευτικής επιτροπής για την ασφάλεια, την υγιεινή και την Προστασία της υγείας στον τόπο εργασίας (74/325/ΕΟΚ)(Ε.Ε αριθ. L 185 της 9.7.1974, σ. 15).

eurovoc_concepts:
advisory committee (EU)
consolidation of EU law
occupational health
occupational safety


text: «HF,* •it * KOMMISSIONEN FOR DE EUROPÆISKE FÆLLESSKABER Bruxelles, den 24. 09. 1996 KOM(96) 34 endelig udg. Forslag til RÅDETS FORORDNING (EF) om ændring af bilage II til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2377/90 om en fælles fremgangsmåde for fastsættelse af maksimalgrænseværdier for restkoncentrationer af veterinærlægemidler i animalske levnedsmidler (forelagt af Kommissionen) BEGRUNDELSE A. Juridiske rammer I medfør af Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2377/90 af 26. juni 19901* påhviler det Kommissionen at vedtage juridisk bindende maksimalgrænseværdier for restkoncentrationer af veterinærmedicinske præparater, som er til stede i levnedsmidler af animalsk oprindelse. Disse maksimalgrænseværdier for restkoncentrationer (i det følgende: MRL) fastsættes efter en videnskabelig evaluering i Udvalget for Veterinærmedicinske Præparater. Dette udvalg anbefaler derefter en klassificering i et af de fire bilag i ovennævnte forordning: - bilag I er forbeholdt stoffer, for hvilke der har kunnet fastsættes en MRL efter vurdering af de toksikologiske risici, som dette stof udgør for folkesundheden - bilag II indeholder stoffer, for hvilke det ikke er nødvendigt at fastsætte en MRL - bilag III er bestemt til stoffer, for hvilke det som følge af utilstrækkelige videnskabelige data ikke er muligt definitivt at fastsætte en MRL, men som uden at bringe forbrugerens sundhed i fare kan tildeles en midlertidig MRL for et bestemt tidsrum, som afhænger af den tid, der er nødvendig til at fuldføre de videnskabelige undersøgelser. Gyldighedsperioden for disse midlertidige MRL'er kan undtagelsesvis forlænges en enkelt gang - bilag IV er forbeholdt de stoffer, for hvilke det ser ud til, at der ikke kan fastsættes en MRL, fordi disse stoffer uanset alle overvejelser af kvantitativ art udgør en risiko for forbrugerens sundhed. i) EFT L 224 af 18. 8. 1990, s. 1. l*. Videnskabelig evaluering Kommissionen har udarbejdet et udkast til forordning (111/5425/95), som især tog sigte på at ændre bilaget til forordning (EØF) nr. 2377/90 for bl. a. at medtage somatosalm heri0. I udkastet blev der taget der hensyn til den videnskabelige evaluering af dette stof, foretaget af Udvalget for Veterinærmedicinske Præparater. Somatosalm er et stof, fremstillet ved en bioteknologisk proces og hørende til familien af somatropiner. Udvalget anbefalede i forbindelse med dets anvendelse hos unge laks at optage det i bilag II til ovennævnte forordning af følgende grunde: - Somatosalm er et protein med en halveringstid i organismen hos fisk, som er meget kort ( < 30mn) - Indgivningsmetoden svarer til en enkelt injektion af det aktive stof 1 eller 2 år inden fisken dræbes. 2) Udkastet sigtede ligeledes mod fem andre stoffer, nemlig azamethiphos, streptomycin, dihydrostreptomycin, gentamicin og neomycin, som senere har været emnet for en særskilt forordning om opstilling af maksimalgrænseværdier for restkoncentrationer (MRL). 2 C. Procedureforløb og behandling i Rådet 1. Den 16. oktober 1995 forelagde Kommissionen Udvalget for Tilpasning til Den tekniske Udvikling af direktiver, som tager sigte på at fjerne de tekniske hindringer for samhandlen inden for den veterinærmedicinske sektor, et udkast til gennemførelsesforordning, hvori man af ovennævnte grunde bl. a. medtog somatosalm i bilag II til forordning (EØF) nr. 2377/90. Dette udkast har ikke i det nævnte udvalg kunnet opnå en udtalelse, som stemmer overens med de foreslåede foranstaltninger. 2. Under foregivelse af, at den af Rådet3) vedtagne ændring vedrørende bovinsomatropin (BST) "indirekte" ville blive anfægtet, hvis en anden somatropin blev markedsført i Fællesskabet, gik repræsentanterne for fire medlemsstater imod selve princippet om klassificering af somatosalm i et af bilagene til forordning (EØF) 2377/90. I denne forbindelse må det understreges, at dels vedrører ovennævnte Rådsbeslutning kun bovinsomatropin og ikke samtlige stoffer med somatropisk virkning, og dels fremgår det af evalueringsrapporten fra Udvalget for Veterinærmedicinske Præparater (og af sagsmappen fra det pågældende medicinalfirma), at til forskel fra BST anvendes somatosalm hverken for at fremme væksten eller for at øge produktiviteten med udelukkende for at gøre det lettere for de unge ferskvandslaks at tilpasse sig til havvand. Dette forklarer den specifikke indgivningsmetode, som består i en enkelt injektion af det aktive stof et eller to år inden fisken dræbes. 3) Rådets beslutning 94/936/EØF af 20. 12. 1994 om ændring af beslutning 90/218/EØF om markedsføring og indgift af bovinsomatropin (BST) (EFT nr. L 366 af 31. 12. 1994, s. 19). 3 Efter Kommissionens anmodning i april 1996 om yderligere oplysninger for at tage hensyn til argumenterne fra repræsentanterne for visse medlemsstater, som modsatte sig klassificeringen af somatosalm, har Udvalget for Veterinærmedicinske Præparater vurderet muligheden af en ulovlig anvendelse af dette stof som vækstfremmende middel hos laks og hos andre arter. Dets udtalelse afgivet den 28. juni 1996 er ikke til at misforstå: Somatosalm er kun aktivt hos laks, og en mulig anvendelse som vækstfremmende middel hos denne fiskeart vil kunne anses for umulig som følge af dette stofs særlige farmakologiske karakteristika og den måde, det skal indgives på for at sikre stoffets effektivitet (nødvendigheden af en direkte indsprøjtning i maven på hver enkelt fisk). Kommissionen ønsker desuden at understrege, at opstillingen af en MLR for dette stof på ingen måde berører indholdet af den beslutning, sôm vil skulle træffes inden for rammerne af en eventuel anmodning om markedsføringstilladelse, idet en sådan beslutning i medfør af fællesskabsretten beror på autonome procedurer og vurderingskriterier. Eftersom dette udkast ikke i udvalget for tilpasning til den tekniske udvikling af direktiver, som tager sigte på at fjerne de tekniske hindringer for samhandlen inden for den veterinærmedicinske sektor, har opnået en udtalelse, som stemmer overens med de foreslåede foranstaltninger, fremsender Kommissionen til Rådet et forslag til forordning i medfør af den fremgangsmåde, der er fastsat i artikel 8 i ovennævnte forordning (EØF) nr. 2377/90. I medfør af samme artikel opfordres Rådet til at vedtage de foreslåede foranstaltninger inden tre måneder efter at have modtaget forslaget. Forslag til RÅDETS FORORDNING (EF) om ændring af bilage II til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2377/90 om en fælles fremgangsmåde for fastsættelse af maksimalgrænseværdier for restkoncentrationer af veterinærlægemidler i animalske levnedsmidler RÅDET FOR DE EUROPÆISKE UNION HAR - under henvisning til Traktaten om Oprettelse af Det Europæiske Fællesskab, under henvisning til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2377/90 af 26. juni 1990 om en fælles fremgangsmåde for fastsættelse af maksimalgrænseværdier for restkoncentrationer af veterinærmedicinske præparater i levnedsmidlen'1, senest ændret ved Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 1433/96^', særlig animalske artikel 6 og 8, under fenvisning til forslag fra Kommissionen, og ud fra følgende betragtninger : overensstemmelse med fastsættes I maksimalgrænseværdier for restkoncentrationer af alle farmakologisk virksomme stoffer, som inden for Fællesskabet anvendes i veterinærlægemidler til behandling af dyr bestemt til levnedsmiddelproduktion; nr. 2377/90 forordning gradvis (EØF) skal der for restkoncentrationer bør kun maksimalgrænseværdier for Veterinærlægemidler har gennemgået alle relevante oplysninger vedrørende sikkerheden af rester af det pågældende stof for forbrugere af animalske levnedsmidler samt sådanne resters indflydelse på industriel forarbejdning af levnedsmidler; fastsættes, efter at Udvalget ved fastsættelse af maksimalgrænseværdier for restkoncentrationer af veterinærlægemidler i animalske levnedsmidler er det nødvendigt at specificere de dyrearter, hvori sådanne rester vil kunne være til stede, de koncentrationer, der må være til stede i hvert af de relevante væv fra det behandlede dyr (målvæv), og arten af den rest, som er relevant for overvågningen af rester (restmarkør); ( |) <2) EFT L 224 af 18. 08. 1990, s. 1 EFT L 184 af 24. 07. 1996, s. 21 somatosalm bømedtages i bilag II til forordning (EØF) nr. 2377/90; der bør fastsættes en tidsfrist på 60 dage inden ikrafttrædelsen af denne forordning for at give medlemsstaterne mulighed for at foretage de tilpasninger, som måtte være nødvendige i de tilladelser til at markedsføre de pågældende veterinærlægemidler, der er givet i medfør af Rådets direktiv 81/851/EØF^', senest ændret ved direktiv 93/40/EØF^1 for at tage hensyn til bestemmelserne i denne forordning; i overensstemmelse med den procedure, der er fastsat i artikel 8 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2377/90, er udkastet til de foranstaltninger, der bør træffes, blevet forelagt Udvalget for Tilpasning til Den Tekniske Udvikling af Direktiver om Fjernelse af Tekniske Handelshindringer for Veterinærlægemidler. Dette har ikke været i stand til at afgive en udtalelse, og Kommissionen skal derfor forelægge Rådet et forslag vedrørende disse foranstaltninger; ,3> ,4> EFT nr. L 317 af 06. 11. 1981, s. 1 EFT nr. L 214 af 24. 08. 1993, s. 31 UDSTEDT FØLGENDE FORORDNING: Artikel 1 Bilage II til forordning (EØF) nr. 2377/90 ændres som angivet i bilaget til nærværende forordning. Artikel 2 Denne forordning træder i kraft 60 dage efter offentliggørelsen i De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende. Denne forordning er bindende i alle enkeltheder og gælder umiddelbart i hver medlemsstat. Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, På Rådets vegne * A. 2. Bilagal II ændres således: Organiske forbindelser Farmakologisk virksomme stoffer B I L AG Dyreart Andre bestemmelser 2. 68. Somatosalm | Laks | 00 ISSN 0254-1459 KOM(96) 34 endelig udg. DOKUMENTER DA 05 03 Katalognummer : CB-CO-96-039-DA-C ISBN 92-77-99944-6 Kontoret for De Europæiske Fsllesskabers Officielle Publikationer L-2985 Luxembourg


title: PREGUNTA ESCRITA n. 2582/96 del Daniel VARELA SUANZES- CARPEGNA a la Comisión. Efectos regionales de la insuficiente cuota láctea española

eurovoc_concepts:
European Regional Development Fund
Galicia
Spain
Treaty on European Union
action programme
agricultural quota
development aid
drinking milk
economic and social cohesion
less-favoured region


title: 96/572/CE: Decisión de la Comisión de 24 de septiembre de 1996 por la que se modifican las Decisiones 91/270/CEE y 92/471/CEE y relativa a la importación de embriones de animales domésticos de la especie bovina procedentes de Argentina (Texto pertinente a los fines del EEE)

eurovoc_concepts:
Argentina
cattle
embryo and foetus
health certificate
health control
import


title: Règlement (CE) n° 1838/96 de la Commission du 24 septembre 1996 fixant les coefficients applicables aux céréales exportées sous forme de Scotch whisky pour la période 1996/1997

eurovoc_concepts:
United Kingdom
barley
cereals
export refund
ratio
spirits


title: 96/571/EY: Komission päätös, tehty 24 päivänä syyskuuta 1996, väliaikaisesta luettelosta kolmansista maista, joista jäsenvaltiot sallivat maidon ja maitopohjaisten tuotteiden tuonnin, ja päätöksen 94/70/EY kumoamisesta tehdyn päätöksen 95/340/EY muuttamisesta (ETA:n kannalta merkityksellinen teksti)

eurovoc_concepts:
health legislation
import licence
milk
milk product
third country
veterinary inspection


title: Rådets förordning (EG) nr 1853/96 av den 24 september 1996 om ändring av förordning (EG) nr 3088/95 om vissa åtgärder för 1996 som syftar till bevarande och förvaltning av fiskeresurserna och som är tillämpliga på fartyg som för polsk flagg