text: COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 11. 04. 1997 COM(97) 123 final 95/0235 (SYN) Amended proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE ON MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR IMPROVING THE SAFETY AND HEALTH PROTECTION OF WORKERS POTENTIALLY AT RISK FROM EXPLOSIVE ATMOSPHERES (presented by the Commission pursuant to Article 189 a (2) of the EC-Treaty) EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM The Commission submitted the original proposal for this Directive to Council on 18 September 1995. 1 The proposal is based on Article 118A of the EC Treaty in the form of an individual directive under Article 16(1) of Council Directive 89/391/EEC2 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the health and safety of workers at work. The aims of the proposal are : a) b) c) to adopt, as provided for in Article 118 A of the Treaty, the minimum requirements for the safety and health protection of workers potentially at risk from explosive atmospheres ; to establish specific provisions to improve the safety and health protection of workers potentially at risk from explosive atmospheres in strict compliance with the principles set out in Directive 89/391/EEC ; to create a suitable framework for explosion protection for industry in general, such as already exists for the mineral-extracting industries (Directives 92/91/EEC3 and 92/104/EEC4). This proposal supplements Directive 94/9/EC5 of 23 March 1994 on the approximation of laws of the Member States concerning equipment and protective systems intended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres. Equipment and protective systems covered by this directive are divided into categories. For the proper use of these categories, the workplaces in which explosive atmospheres may be present must be classified in terms of zones. One of the purposes of this proposal is to create a standard legal basis for the zoning, based on a risk assessment of the workplaces where the equipment is to be used allowing for the adequate selection of equipment with the suitable level of protection for each zone. The Economic and Social Committee rendered a favorable opinion during its 333rd plenary session on 28 and 29 February 1996. Subsequent to the opinion of the European Parliament (first reading) of 20 June 1996, the Commission herewith presents to the Council, under Article 189a(2) of the EC Treaty, an amended proposal for a Directive. The text contains two main types of amendments : one group incorporates the European Parliament amendments accepted by the Commission a second group adresses editorial and linguistic problems trying to make the texts in the différents languages coherent in particular as Council directive 94/9/EC is concerned. Regarding the first group it must be noted that Parliament established 14 amendments (Annex 1) four of which the Commission did not accept, the others were accepted in part or in total. Concerning the four amendments which were not taken into account. Amendment N° 6 was considered unacceptable since Article 9 covers requirements on workplaces and work equipment ; OJ No C332, 9. 12. 1995, p. 10 OJ No LI 83, 29. 61989, p. 1 OJ No L348, 28. 11. 1992, p. 9 OJ No L404, 31. 12. 1992. p. 10 OJNoLlOO, 19. 4. 1994, p. 1 -Page- Amendment N° 9, was considered to introduce uncertainty regarding the entering into force of the directive. However the Commission supported the concept underlying the amendment. It indicated that during the inter-institutional négociations, it will bear in mind this idea to ensure that information is promptly provided to all parties concerned. Amendment N° 10 was considered not acceptable as the proposed reference does not add anything essential but could create legal uncertainty. However, the Commission clarifies its original text by deleting the words, "and the assessment of the anticipated effects" in order to bring the text more in line with ISO standards in the domain. Finally, regarding amendment N° 12, it was felt that this amendment renders the text too restictive and imposes an unnecessary constraint on undertakings, in particular small and medium-sized enterprises and therefore was not accepted. Concerning, the amendments that were accepted either partly or totally : Regarding amendment N° 2, it was felt that the first part of the amendment clarifies the text of the original proposal. In contrast the last paragraph collides with the risk assessment philosophy as it imposes the application concurrently and simultaneously of the three basic principles, rendering the text unnecessarily stringent. Regarding amendment N° 3, the substitution of "responsible supervision" by "appropriate supervision" also reflects the opinion of ECOSOC and is acceptable. However including "training and education" in this context is meaningless as far as supervision is concerned. The last paragraph of the amendment cannot be accepted since it adds nothing to what is already stated in Article 4. 4 of the proposal and Article 6 of the Framework Directive (89/391/EEC). Regarding amendment N° 4, the Commission considers that the amendment is acceptable with a slightly different wording in line with the Commission's original text which specifies that the employer "shall ensure" that an explosion protection document is drawn up and kept up-to-date. Otherwise, the employer will be obliged to draw up this document himself, which would impose unacceptable constraints on small and medium-sized enterprises. Regarding amendment N° 7, the Commission considers that the deletion of "work equipment" is a logical consequence of the wording of Article 9, paragraph 1 and 2. However, workplaces already in use before entry into force of this directive have to comply with all the minimum requirements specified in the proposal and not only those of Article 4. With respect to amendment N° 8, the Commission considers that the deletion of the reference to Article 17 of the Framework Directive renders the text imprecise since the amendment does not specify who draws up the vademecum. As a consequence, it should be complemented in a way indicating that the Commission will draw up the Vademecum in accordance with the procedure laid down under Article 17 of Directive 89/391/EEC, modifications and supplements shall be subject to the same procedure. Five amendments N° 1, 5, 11, 13 and 14 improve the original text, and are totally accepted by the Commission. In particular the last one provides for early information to small and medium-sized enterprises which will facilitate their adaptation to the requirements of the directive -Page- Amended proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE ON MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR IMPROVING THE SAFETY AND HEALTH PROTECTION OF WORKERS POTENTIALLY AT RISK FROM EXPLOSIVE ATMOSPHERES Individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 of Directive 89/391/EEC (presented by the Commission pursuant to Article 189 a (2) of the EC-Treaty) 1b Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal PROPOSAL FOR A COUNCIL DIRECTIVE ON MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR IMPROVING THE SAFETY AND HEALTH PROTECTION OF WORKERS POTENTIALLY AT RISK FROM EXPLOSIVE ATMOSPHERES THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Having regard to the Treaty establishing the unchanged European Community, and in particular Article 118a thereof, the Commission proposal1 unchanged to Having regard submitted after consultation with the Advisory Committee on Safety, Hygiene and Health Protection at Work and the Safety and Health Commission for the Mining and Other Extractive Industries, In cooperation with the European Parliament2, unchanged Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee3, unchanged Whereas Article 118a of the Treaty provides that the Council shall adopt, by means of directives, minimum requirements designed to encourage improvements, especially the working environment, as regards the health and safety of workers; in unchanged Whereas, under the terms of that Article, those directives are to avoid imposing administrative, financial and legal constraints in a way which would hold back the creation and development of small and medium-sized undertakings; unchanged Whereas the improvement of occupational safety, hygiene and health is an objective which should not be economic to considerations; subordinated purely 1 OJNoC 2 OJNoC 3 OJ No C p. ,p. , p. unchanged Page - 1 c Original Commission Proposal compliance with the minimum Whereas requirements for improving the safety and health protection of workers potentially at risk from explosive atmospheres is essential to ensure workers' safety and health protection; Modified Proposal unchanged unchanged of measures Whereas this Directive is an individual directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work4; whereas, therefore, the provisions of the said Directive are also fully applicable to cases in which workers are potentially at risk from explosive atmospheres without prejudice to more restrictive or specific provisions contained in this Directive; to Whereas this Directive constitutes a practical step towards the achievement of the social dimension of the internal market; unchanged Whereas the recitals to Parliament and Council Directive 94/9/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning equipment and protective systems in potentially explosive atmospheres state that it is intended to prepare an additional directive based on Article 118a covering, in particular, explosion hazards which derive from a given use and/or types and methods of installation of equipment; intended for use Whereas Directive 94/9/EC of 23 March 1994 of European Parliament and Council on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning equipment and protective systems explosive intended atmospheres5 states that it is intended to prepare an additional directive based on Article liSa covering, in particular, explosion hazards which derive from a given use and/or types and methods of installation of equipment; in potentially for use Whereas explosion protection is of particular importance to safety; whereas explosions endanger the lives and health of workers as a result of the uncontrolled effects of flame and pressure, the presence of noxious reaction products and consumption of the oxygen in the ambient air which workers need to breathe; unchanged 4 OJ No L 183, 29. 6. 1989, p. 1 5 OJ No L 100, 19. 4. 1994, p. 1 - Page - 2 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal deleted of propagation within Whereas explosions are characterised by the extreme rapidity with which they occur and the danger interlinked installations; whereas manual intervention after an ignition is normally impossible; whereas, therefore, the minimum requirements for improving the safety and health protection of workers at risk from explosive atmospheres place special emphasis on the need for analysis to forecast the potential danger and the need for all necessary protective measures to be included right from the planning stage; in the context of which Whereas the large number of potential explosion risks necessitates an overall assessment of places of it becomes work, increasingly in line with technical development, to take account of logical (software) malfunctions in automatically controlled processes; important, deleted Whereas the organisational aspects of explosion protection must be adapted to the technical problems occurring at places of work so that no weaknesses arise in the explosion protection arrangements; whereas Directive 89/391/EEC requires the employer to be in possession of an assessment of the risks to workers' safety and health at work; whereas this requirement is to be regarded as being amplified by the present Directive in that it provides that the employer shall draw up an explosion protection document and keep it up to date; whereas this explosion protection document may be part of the assessment of the risks to safety and health at work required by Article 9 (l)a of Directive 89/391/EEC; whereas the explosion protection document must contain the necessary measures for the safety and health protection of workers potentially at risk from explosive atmospheres; Whereas the establishment of a coherent strategy for the prevention of explosions requires that organisational measures complement the technical measures taken at the workplace; whereas Directive 89/391/EEC requires the employer to be in possession of an assessment of the risks to workers' safety and health at work; whereas this requirement is to be regarded as being specified by the present Directive in that it provides that the employer shall draw up an explosion protection document or set of documents which satisfy the minimum requirements laid down in this Directive and keep it up to date; whereas the explosion protection documents may be part of the assessment of the risks to safety and health at work required by Article 9 (l)a of Directive 89/391/EEC; whereas the explosion protection documents must contain the necessary measures for the safety and health protection of workers potentially at risk from explosive atmospheres; - Page - 3 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal Whereas an assessment of explosion risks may be required under other Community legislation; whereas, in order to avoid unnecessary duplication of work, the employer should be allowed, in accordance with national practice, to combine documents, parts of documents or other equivalent reports produced in response to other legislation to form a single "safety report"; Whereas an assessment of explosion risks may be required under other Community acts, whereas, in order to avoid unnecessary duplication of work, the employer should be allowed, in accordance with national practice, to combine documents, parts of documents or other equivalent reports produced under other Community acts to form a single "safety report"; preventive measures must Whereas be supplemented if necessary by additional measures which become effective when ignition has taken place; whereas maximum safety can be achieved only by combining preventive and supplementary measures and taking account of operational conditions and the necessary maintenance; preventive measures must Whereas be supplemented if necessary by additional measures which become effective when ignition has taken place; whereas maximum safety can be achieved by combining preventive measures and other additional measures limiting the detrimental effects of explosions on workers; deleted Whereas the prevention of explosive atmospheres as a general rule has priority; whereas in cases in which this is not possible in the current state of the art the ignition of explosive atmospheres must be prevented and the effects of any explosion kept within acceptable limits; whereas employers have a duty to make provision for all necessary safety measures and systems; Whereas Directive 94/9/EC, which applies without restriction from 1 July 2003, divides the equipment and protective systems which it covers into equipment groups and categories; whereas the present Directive provides for a classification of the places where explosive atmospheres may occur in terms of zones; whereas this classification is to be carried out by the employer and relates to the place of use; Whereas Directive 94/9/EC divides the equipment and protective systems which it covers into equipment groups and categories; whereas the present Directive provides for a classification by the employer of the places where explosive atmospheres may occur in terms of zones and determines which equipment and protective systems groups and categories should be used in each zone; Whereas the requirements formulated in this Directive may not be adequate in all cases to prevent danger from hazards due to explosive mixtures under conditions other than atmospheric conditions or with co-reactants other than air, so that further measures are required; deleted - Page - 4 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal Whereas the scope of this Directive does not include medical facilities used directly for the treatment of patients, where particular importance attaches to the protection of patients in addition to workers' safety and health protection; whereas in such places the minimum requirements laid down in this Directive may not be sufficient in all cases; deleted deleted fuels, Whereas the scope of this Directive does not include the normal use of appliances burning since Council Directive gaseous 90/396/EEC5 of 29 June 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to appliances burning gaseous fuels contains essential requirements concerning the placing on the market and bringing into service of such appliances, which are applicable both to the appliances themselves and to their installation, so as to ensure that the safety of persons, domestic animals and property is not compromised; Whereas the scope of this Directive does not encompass handling of explosives and chemically unstable substances, since its requirements may not be sufficient in all cases and special measures may therefore be necessary; deleted deleted Whereas the scope of this Directive does not encompass the mineral-extracting industries as defined in Directives 92/91/EEC and 92/104/EEC, which relate to the protection of workers in these industries and already cover the question of explosion protection; whereas the minimum requirements laid down in those Directives are stricter than those in the present Directive on account of the greater potential hazard in the mineral-extracting industries; Whereas the scope of this Directive does not encompass the use of means of transport, including the pertinent sea-going vessels, on which provisions of the international agreements (ADR, IMO, etc. ) apply, since these already ensure protection of workers, deleted 5 OJ No L 196, 26. 7. 1990, p. 15 Page - 5 Original Commission Proposal HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: Modified Proposal unchanged SECTION I GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 Subject (1) This Directive, which is the. individual directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC, lays down minimum requirements for the safety and health protection of workers potentially at risk from explosive atmospheres as defined in Article 2. unchanged (2) This Directive does not apply to unchanged a) b) c) d) e) medical facilities used directly for the treatment of patients; normal use of appliances burning gaseous fuels as defined in Directive 90/396/EEC; b) use of appliances burning gaseous fuels in compliance with Directive 90/396/EEC6; and handling, manufacture, transport of explosives or chemically unstable substances. storage unchanged establishments of the mineral-extracting industries covered by Directive 92/91/EEC or Directive 92/104/EEC; d) mineral-extracting industries covered by Directive or Directive 92/104/EEC8; 92/91/EEC7 use of means of transport, including sea going vessels, on which the pertinent provisions of the international agreements (ADR, IMO, etc. ) apply. e) use of means of transport, including sea going vessels, on which the pertinent provisions of the international agreements (ADR, IMO) apply. (3) The provisions of Directive 89/391/EEC and the pertinent individual directives are fully applicable to the domain referred to in paragraph 1, without prejudice to more restrictive and/or specific provisions contained in this Directive. unchanged 6 OJ No L 196,26. 7. 1990, p. 15 7 OJ No L 348,28. 11. 1992, p. 9 8 OJ No L 404,31. 12. 1992, p. 10 - Page - 6 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal Article 2 Definition For the purposes of this Directive, an explosive atmosphere shall be a mixture with air, under atmospheric conditions, of flammable substances in the form of gases, vapours, mists or dusts in which, after ignition has occurred, combustion spreads to the entire unburned mixture. unchanged SECTION n OBLIGATIONS OF THE EMPLOYER Article 3 Article 3 Principles for the prevention of and protection against explosions Principles for the prevention of and protection against explosions With a view to preventing and providing protection against explosions, the employer shall take technical and/or organisational measures appropriate to the nature of the operation, in accordance with the following basic principles, in order to: With a view to preventing, within the meaning of Article 6, paragraph 2 of Directive 89/391/EEC, and providing protection against explosions, the employer shall take technical and/or organisational measures appropriate to the nature of the operation, in accordance with the following basic principles: prevent the atmospheres, prevent atmospheres, the formation of explosive the prevention of the formation of explosive atmospheres, ignition of explosive the avoidance of the ignition of explosive atmospheres, reduce the effects of an explosion in such a way that workers are not at risk. the reduction of the effects of an explosion in such a way that workers are not at risk. Article 4 Article 4 General obligations General obligations (1) To ensure the safety and health of workers, and in accordance with the basic principles laid down in Article 3, the employer shall take the necessary measures so that: (1) To ensure the safety and health of workers, and in accordance with the basic principles laid down in Article 3, the employer shall take the necessary measures so that: - Page - 7 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal where explosive atmospheres may arise in such quantities as to endanger the safety and health of workers, the working environment is such, given the appropriate measures, that workers can perform the work assigned to them without danger to their safety and health or to the safety and health of others, where explosive atmospheres may arise in such quantities as to endanger the safety and health of workers, the working environment is such that workers can perform the work assigned to them without danger to their safety and health or to the safety and health of others, - of workers responsible supervision is ensured during the presence in working environments where explosive atmospheres may arise in such quantities as to endanger the safety and health of workers, appropriate supervision during the presence of workers shall be ensured, including the use of monitoring devices and modern technical means, in working environments where explosive atmospheres may arise in such quantities as to endanger the safety and health of workers work during which workers may be at risk from explosive atmospheres is carried out only by competent persons or under their supervision, unchanged where necessary, workers wear only working clothes or personal protective equipment suitable for use in places where explosive atmospheres may arise in such quantities as to endanger the safety and health of workers. where explosive atmospheres may arise in such quantities as to endanger the health and safety of workers only appropriate working clothes and/or personal protective equipment are worn by workers. (2) Without prejudice to Council Directives 89/654/EEC, 89/655/EEC and 92/57/EEC, the employer shall ensure : (2) Without prejudice to Council Directives 89/654/EEC9, 89/655/EEC10 and 92/57/EEC11, the employer shall ensure : in accordance with the principle of overall assessment of the place of work, that work equipment and all installation materials are suitable for use in places where explosive atmospheres may arise and are so erected, installed and assembled that they do not give rise to an explosion risk; in accordance with the principle of overall assessment of the workplace, that work equipment and all installation materials are suitable for use in places where explosive atmospheres may arise and are erected, installed and assembled so that they do not give rise to an explosion risk; that the measures required under Article 3 are combined or supplemented as necessary and that the necessary measures against the propagation of explosions are taken; that the measures required under Article 3 are where necessary combined and where necessary supplemented with measures against the propagation of explosions; 9 10 11 OJ No L 393,30. 12. 1989, p. 1 OJ No L 393, 30. 12. 1989, p. 13 OJ No L 245,26. 08. 1992, p. 6 - Page - 8 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal where necessary, that appropriate emergency routes are indicated and escape and rescue facilities are provided and maintained to ensure that workers can leave endangered places promptly and safely in the event of danger. where necessary, that appropriate emergency routes are indicated and escape and rescue facilities are provided and maintained to ensure that in the event of danger workers can leave endangered places promptly and safely. Following an appropriate health and safety (3) policy, the employer shall ensure that a health and safety plan for explosion protection measures, hereinafter referred to as the "explosion protection document", satisfying the pertinent requirements of Articles 6, 9 and 10 of Directive 89/391/EEC, is drawn up and kept up to date. for The employer shall ensure that a health and (3) safety document explosion protection measures, hereinafter referred to as the "explosion protection document", which may be a document or set of documents, satisfying the pertinent requirements of Articles 6 and 9 of Directive 89/391/EEC, is drawn up and kept up to date explosion protection document The demonstrate in particular: shall unchanged that the explosion risks incurred by the workers have been determined and assessed; unchanged that adequate measures will be taken to attain the aims of this Directive; unchanged that the workplace and work equipment including warning devices are designed operated and maintained with due regard for safety; unchanged that, in accordance with Directive 89/655/EEC, arrangements have been made for the safe use of work equipment. unchanged The explosion protection document shall be drawn up prior to the commencement of work and be revised if the working environment, in particular the workplace, work equipment or organisation of the work, has undergone significant changes, extensions or conversions. The explosion protection document shall be drawn up prior to the commencement of work and be revised when the workplace, work equipment or organisation of the work, undergoes significant changes, extensions or conversions. (4) Where workers from several undertakings are present at the same workplace, each employer shall be responsible for all matters under his control. (4) Where workers from several undertakings are present at the same workplace, each employer shall be responsible for all matters coming under his control. - Page - 9 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal The employer responsible for the workplace in accordance with national law and/or practice shall coordinate the implementation of all the measures concerning workers' safety and health and shall state, in his explosion protection document, the aim of that coordination and the measures and procedures for implementing it. unchanged The coordination shall not affect the responsibility of the individual employers as provided for in Directive 89/391/EEC. The coordination shall not affect the individual responsibility of each employer as provided for in Directive 89/391/EEC. Article 5 Places containing explosive atmospheres Places where explosive atmospheres may occur (1) The employer shall specify in the explosion protection document the places to which the minimum requirements laid down in Annex II apply. unchanged shall He atmospheres may occur Annex! classify places in where explosive accordance with He shall classify places, where explosive atmospheres may occur, into zones in accordance with Annex I. (2) In respect of the places covered by paragraph 1, the employer shall ensure compliance with the relevant provisions of the minimum requirements for improving the safety and health protection of workers potentially at risk from explosive atmospheres as laid down in Annex II. The employer shall ensure (2) the minimum requirements laid down in Annex II are applied to places covered by paragraph 1. that Annex IV provides guidance on the performance of work in the various zones. unchanged (3) Where necessary, places where explosive atmospheres may arise in such quantities as to endanger the safety and health of workers shall be marked with signs at the points of entry to them, in accordance with Annex III. unchanged - Page -10 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal Article 6 Worker information Without prejudice to Article 10 of Directive 89/391/EEC, workers and/or their representatives shall be informed of all measures to be taken concerning safety and health at work, in particular those taken in pursuance of Articles 3 to 5 of this Directive. unchanged Article 7 Consultation and participation of workers Consultation and participation of workers and/or take place of their representatives shall in accordance with Article 11 of Directive 89/391/EEC on all matters covered by this Directive. unchanged Article 8 Training of workers Without prejudice to Article 12 of Directive 89/391/EEC, the employer shall take the necessary steps to ensure that workers potentially at risk from explosive atmospheres receive appropriate training, in particular in pursuance of Articles 3 to 5 of this Directive. unchanged Article 9 Special requirements for work equipment and workplaces (1) Work equipment for use in places where explosive atmospheres may occur which is made available in the undertaking or establishment for the first time after the entry into force of this Directive and up to 30 June 2003 shall comply with the minimum requirements laid down in Annex II A, if no other Community directive is applicable or is so only partially. unchanged - Page -11 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal (2) Work equipment for use in places where explosive atmospheres may occur which is made available in the undertaking or establishment for the first time after 30 June 2003 shall comply with the minimum requirements laid down in Annex II AandB. unchanged (3) Workplaces which contain places where explosive atmospheres may occur and which are used for the first time after the entry into force of this Directive shall comply with its minimum requirements. unchanged (4) Where work equipment and workplaces which contain places where explosive atmospheres may occur are already in use before the entry into force of this Directive, they shall comply with its minimum requirements no later than three years after its entry into force. (4) Where workplaces which contain places where explosive atmospheres may occur are already in use before the entry into force of this Directive, they shall comply with its minimum requirements no later than three years after its entry into force. restructuring extension or If, after this Directive enters into force, any (5) modification, is undertaken in workplaces containing places where explosive atmospheres may occur, the employer shall take the necessary steps to ensure that these comply with this Directive's minimum requirements. unchanged SECTION in MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS Article 10 Adjustments to the Annexes Purely technical adjustments to the Annexes of this Directive made necessary by unchanged the adoption of directives on technical harmonisation and standardisation in the field of explosion protection, and/or - Page -12 Modified Proposal Original Commission Proposal technical progress, changes in international regulations or specifications, and new findings on the prevention of and protection against explosions shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 17 of Directive 89/391/EEC. Article 11 Vademecum Article 11 Vademecum A vademecum shall be drawn up in agreement with the Council, describing some possible ways of complying with the minimum requirements contained in this Directive. Modifications and supplements to the vademecum shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 17 of Directive 89/391/EEC. A vademecum setting out guidelines for some possible ways of complying with the minimum requirements contained in this Directive shall be drawn up by the Commission in accordance with the procedure laid down under Article 17 of and Directive supplements shall be subject the same procedure. 89/391/EEC, modifications to Article 12 (new) Information to undertakings Member States shall ensure that the undertakings particularly medium and small sized enterprises, likely to be affected by this Directive, are timely informed of its provisions. In this conter Member States shall also ensure that the vademecum drawn up pursuant to Article 11 is widely distributed. Article 12 Final provisions Article 13 Final provisions (1) Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive not later than 31 December 1997. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof. (1) Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive not later than 31 December 1999. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof. When Member States adopt these provisions, these shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference at the time of their official publication. The procedure for such reference shall be adopted by the Member States. unchanged - Page -13 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal (2) Member States shall communicate to the Commission the texts of the provisions of national law which they have already adopted or adopt in the field governed by this Directive. unchanged shall report (3) Member States the Commission every five years on the practical implementation of the provisions of this Directive, indicating the points of view of employers and workers. to unchanged inform the European The Commission shall Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Advisory Committee on Safety, Hygiene and Health Protection at Work. unchanged Article 13 Article 14 This Directive is addressed to the Member States. unchanged Done at Brussels, For the Council -Page-14 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal ANNEX I CLASSIFICATION OF PLACES WHERE EXPLOSIVE ATMOSPHERES MAY OCCUR ANNEX I unchanged 1. Preliminary note 1. Preliminary note shall be The following system of classification applied to places where, as a result of local and operational conditions, an explosive atmosphere may occur in such quantities as to require precautions to be taken in accordance with Articles 3 to 5 of this Directive. 2. Places where explosive atmospheres may occur shall be The following system of classification applied to places where precautions in accordance with Articles 3 to 5 of this Directive shall be taken. A place in which an explosive atmosphere may occur in such quantities as to require special precautions to protect the health and safety of the workers concerned shall be regarded as hazardous within the meaning of this Directive. unchanged A place in which an explosive atmosphere is not expected to occur in such quantities as to require special precautions shall be regarded as non-hazardous within the meaning of this Directive. unchanged Flammable substances shall be classified as materials which may form an explosive atmosphere unless an investigation of their properties has shown thaï in mixtures with air they are incapable of independently propagating an explosion. Flammable and/or combustible substances sh<u* be considered as materials which may form an explosive atmosphere unless an investigation of their properties has shown that in mixtures with air they are incapable of independently propagating an explosion. 3. Classification of hazardous places 3. Classification of hazardous places Hazardous places shall be classified in terms of zones on the basis of the frequency and duration of the occurrence of an explosive atmosphere and the assessment of the anticipated effects. Hazardous places shall be classified in terms of zones on the basis of the frequency and duration of the occurrence of an explosive atmosphere. The extent of the measures to be taken in accordance with Annex II A is determined by this classification. The guide criteria for performance of work in the various zones (Annex IV) provide useful information which may be an aid to practical application. The extent of the measures to be taken in accordance with Annex II A is determined by this classification. - Page -15 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal ZoneO ZoneO A place in which an explosive atmosphere consisting of a mixture with air of flammable substances in the form of gas, vapour or mist is present continuously or for long periods or frequently. A place in which an explosive atmosphere consisting of a mixture with air of flammable substances in the form of gas, vapour or mist is present continuously or for long periods or frequently. Zone 1 Zone 1 A place in which an explosive atmosphere consisting of a mixture with air of flammable substances in the form of gas, vapour or mist is likely to occur occasionally. A place in which an explosive atmosphere consisting of a mixture with air of flammable substances in the form of gas, vapour or mist is likely to occur in normal operation occasionally. Zone 2 Zone 2 in which an explosive atmosphere A place A place consisting of a mixture with air of flammable substances in the form of gas, vapour or mist is not likely to occur or, if it does occur, will persist for a short period only. in which an explosive atmosphere consisting of a mixture with air of flammable substances in the form of gas, vapour or mist is not likely to occur in normal operation but, if it does occur, will persist for a short period only. Zone 20 Zone 20 A place in which an explosive atmosphere in the form of a cloud of combustible dust in air is present continuously, long periods or frequently and in which deposits of combustible dust of unknown or excessive thickness may be formed. (Dust deposits alone are not grounds for classification as Zone 20). for A place in which an explosive atmosphere in the form of a cloud of combustible dust in air is present continuously, or for long periods or frequently. Zone 21 Zone 21 A place in which an explosive atmosphere in the form of a cloud of combustible dust in air can occasionally occur and in which deposits or layers of combustible dust can generally be present. A place in which an explosive atmosphere in the form of a cloud of combustible dust in air is likely to occur in normal operation occasionally. -Page-16 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal Zone 22 Zone 22 A place in which an explosive atmosphere in the form of a cloud of combustible dust in air is not likely to occur or in which accumulations or layers of combustible dust are present. A place in which an explosive atmosphere in the form of a cloud of combustible dust in air is not likely to occur in normal operation but, if it does occur, will persist for a short period only. Note I : Layers, deposits and heaps of combustible dust shall be considered as any other source which can form an explosive atmosphere. Note II: Normal operation means the situation when their design installations are used within parameters. -Page-17 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal ANNEX II ANNEX II A. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR IMPROVING THE SAFETY AND HEALTH WORKERS PROTTECTION POTENTIALLY AT RISK FROM EXPLOSIVE ATMOSPHERES OF A. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR IMPROVING THE SAFETY AND HEALTH PROTECTION OF WORKERS POTENTIALLY AT RISK FROM EXPLOSIVE ATMOSPHERES PRELIMINARY NOTE PRELIMINARY NOTE The obligations laid down in this Annex apply The obligations laid down in this Annex apply whenever required by the features of workplaces, workstations, the equipment or substances used or the dangers caused by the activity in question as a result of explosive atmospheres, whenever required by the features of workplaces, workstations, the equipment or substances used or the dangers caused by the activity related to the risks from explosive atmospheres, to equipment in non-hazardous places which is required for, or helps to ensure, the safe operation of equipment located in hazardous places. unchanged 1. Organisational measures 1. 1 Competent workers For any workplace, there shall be available a sufficient number of workers with the requisite skills, experience and training to perform the explosion protection tasks assigned to them. unchanged 1. 2 Written instructions and permits to work 1. 2 Written instructions and permits to work Where required by the explosion protection document Work in places defined as hazardous in the explosion protection document shall be performed in accordance with written instructions to be established by the employer. written instructions specifying the rules to be observed shall be issued for every workplace, taking into account the size of the operation and nature of activities, A system of permits to work shall be established by the employer for carrying out both hazardous activities and activities which may interact with other work to cause hazards as defined in the explosion protection document. a system of permits to work shall be applied for carrying out both hazardous activities and activities which may interact with other work to cause hazards. Page-18 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal Permits to work shall be issued by a person with responsibility for this function prior to the commencement of work. unchanged Regular review of safety and health 1. 3 measures The employer shall ensure that the measures taken to protect the safety and health of the workers are reviewed regularly, at least once per year, to ensure compliance with this Directive. unchanged 2. Assessment of explosion risks Any assessment of explosion risks shall be 2. 1 based on unchanged the likelihood that explosive atmospheres will occur and their persistence, the likelihood that ignition sources will be present and become effective, the scale of the anticipated effects. Ignitability shall be assessed by taking into 2. 2 account, in particular, 2. 2 Ignitability shall be assessed by taking into account, in particular, the possible degree of dispersal of flammable substances, the possible concentration of flammable substances in air within their explosion limits. the degree of dispersion of flammable and/or combustible substances, the concentration of flammable and/or combustible substances 2. 3 Explosion risks shall be assessed overall. 2. 3 Explosion risks shall be assessed overall. The following are of particular importance: The following are of particular importance: installations, substances used, processes, possible interaction, including interaction with the working environment. installations, substances used, processes, and their possible interaction. 2. 4 Working areas which are or can be in which connected via openings to places explosive atmospheres may occur shall be taken into account in assessing explosion risks. 2. 4 Places which are or can be connected via openings to places in which explosive atmospheres may occur shall be taken into account in assessing explosion risks. -Page-19 Original Commission Proposal Planning principles 3. Modified Proposal Planning of installations 3. 1 When planning new installations or the modification of existing ones, attention shall be paid, in particular, to unchanged conditions, including normal operating maintenance work, constructional factors, commissioning and decommissioning, malfunctions, foreseeable fault conditions, misuse which may anticipated. reasonably be It shall also be ascertained as part of this process whether It shall also be ascertained as part of this process whether flammable substances can be replaced by form explosive others which cannot mixtures, all types of connecting and coupling devices can be avoided in places in which explosive atmospheres may occur. flammable and/or combustible substances can be replaced by others which cannot form explosive mixtures, all types of connections and couplings can be avoided in places in which explosive atmospheres may occur. 3. 2 If the explosion protection document indicates that hazards to workers or the working environment cannot be ruled out, suitable measures and protective systems shall be introduced to combat such hazards. 3. 2 If hazards to workers are identified at the design stage, suitable provisions and protective systems shall be planned to combat such hazards. 3. 3 If the likelihood of an ignition source becoming effective cannot be assessed, the ignition source shall be regarded as being effective at all selected times, accordingly. protective measures and 3. 3 If the likelihood of an ignition source becoming effective cannot be assessed, the ignition source shall be regarded as being effective at all times. 4. Explosion protection measures 4. 1 If an explosive atmosphere contains several types of flammable gases, vapours, mists or dusts, protective measures shall be appropriate to the greatest potential hazard. 4. 1 If an explosive atmosphere contains several types of flammable and/or combustible gases, vapours, mists or dusts, protective measures shall be appropriate to the greatest potential hazard. of ignition Prevention 4. 2 in accordance with Article 3 shall also take account of electrostatic discharges, where workers or the working environment act as the charge carrier or charge producer. hazards unchanged Page -20 Original Commission Proposal Suitable precautions shall be taken to 4. 3 prevent propagation of explosions by dangerous chain reactions. Modified Proposal unchanged unchanged 4. 4 Work equipment and associated connecting devices shall be so assembled that they do not give rise to an explosion hazard. They may be brought into service only if the explosion protection document shows that their operation will not involve an explosion hazard. This applies also to work equipment and associated connecting devices which are not regarded as equipment or protective systems within the meaning of Directive 94/9/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States6 concerning equipment and protective systems intended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres into an installation can in itself give rise to an ignition hazard. Suitable precautions shall be taken to prevent confusion between connecting devices. incorporation their if 4. 5 If the way in which portable appliances are used is such that they may be operated in places with different degrees of potential danger, appropriate organisational measures shall be taken to ensure safe operation; otherwise such appliances shall be selected on the basis of the most unfavourable conditions of use. 4. 5 If portable appliances may be operated in places with different degrees of potential danger, appropriate organisational measures shall be taken to ensure safe operation; otherwise such appliances shall be selected on the basis of the most unfavourable conditions of use. It shall be ensured that only those 4. 6 measuring instruments for recording explosive atmospheres are used which offer the reliability and accuracy appropriate to the actual conditions of use. It shall be ensured that only those 4. 6 measuring instruments for detecting explosive atmospheres are used which offer the reliability and accuracy appropriate to the actual conditions of use. 4. 7 Before explosion conditions are reached, it shall still be possible for the necessary explosion protection measures to be carried out in safety. Workers shall be given optical and/or acoustic warnings and, where necessary, withdrawn. 4. 7 It shall be ensured that the necessary explosion protection measures can be carried out in safety before explosion conditions are reached. Workers shall be given optical and/or acoustic warnings and, where necessary, withdrawn before the explosion conditions are reached. 4. 8 Protection systems providing explosion pressure relief shall safely divert the explosion pressure and any substances released. unchanged Any gases released which may give rise to 4. 9 explosion hazards shall be suitably evacuated. unchanged 6 OJ No L 100, 19. 4. 1994, p. 14 -Page-21 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal 4. 10 Deposits of explosible dusts outside work equipment shall be removed or rendered harmless. unchanged 4. 11 Where additional risks may arise if the power supply to equipment and protective systems is interrupted, it shall be possible to maintain them in a safe state of operation independently of the rest of the installation. 4. 11 Where equipment and protective systems can give rise to a spread of additional risks in the event of a power failure, it must be possible to maintain them in a safe state of operation independently of the rest of the installation. 4. 12 Manual override shall be possible in order to shut down the equipment and protective systems incorporated within automatic processes which deviate from the intended operating conditions. 4. 12 Manual override must be possible in order to shut down the equipment and protective systems incorporated within automatic processes which deviate from the intended operating conditions, provided that this does not compromise safety. Only competent persons may take such action. Only competent workers may take such action. 4. 13 When the emergency shutdown is actuated, accumulated energy shall be dissipated or insulated as quickly and as safely as possible so that it no longer constitutes a hazard. 4. 13 When the emergency shutdown system is actuated, accumulated energy must be disipated as quickly and as safely as possible or isolated so that it no longer constitutes a hazard. This does not apply to electrochemically-stored energy. This does not apply to electrochemically-stored energy. 4. 14 Before a workplace containing places where explosive atmospheres may occur is used for the first time, its overall explosion safety shall be checked. unchanged The requisite conditions for ensuring explosion protection shall be maintained. unchanged 4. 15 Such checks shall be carried out by persons who possess particular expertise in the field of explosion protection as a result of their professional training, experience and current job. 4. 15 Such checks shall be carried out by persons competent in the field of explosion protection as a result of their professional training, experience and current job. Such persons shall be recognised and/or appointed for carrying out checks in a specific field in legislation and/or accordance with national practice. deleted Page -22 Original Commission Proposal B CRITERIA FOR THE WORK EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS SELECTION OF INSTALLATION Modified Proposal CRITERIA FOR THE SELECTION OF B. EQUIPMENT AND PROTECTIVE SYSTEMS If the explosion protection document based on a risk assessment does not state otherwise, work equipment and installation materials for all places in which explosive atmospheres may occur shall be selected on the basis of the categories set out in Parliament and Council Directive 94/9/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning equipment and protective systems intended explosive atmospheres7. in potentially for use If the explosion protection document based on a risk assessment does not state otherwise, equipment and protective systems for all places in which explosive atmospheres may occur shall be selected on the basis of the categories set out in Parliament and Council Directive 94/9/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning equipment and protective systems intended explosive atmospheres. in potentially for use ZoneO ZoneO In Zone 0, Category 1 equipment shall be used which is intended for use in areas in which explosive atmospheres caused by mixtures of air and gases, vapours or mists are present continuously, for long periods or frequently. In Zone 0, Category 1 equipment shall be used which is intended for use in places in which explosive atmospheres caused by mixtures of air and gases, vapours or mists are present continuously, for long periods or frequently. Zone 1 Zone 1 In Zone 1, Category 2 equipment shall be used which is intended for use in areas in which explosive atmospheres caused by gases, vapours or mists are likely to occur occasionally. Equipment suitable for use in Zone 0 may also be used. In Zone 1, Category 2 equipment shall be used which is intended for use in places in which explosive atmospheres caused by gases, vapours or mists are likely to occur occasionally. Equipaient suitable for use in Zone 0 may also be used. Zone 2 Zone 2 In Zone 2, Category 3 equipment shall be used which is intended for use in areas in which explosive atmospheres caused by gases, vapours or mists are unlikely to occur or, if they do, are likely to do so only infrequently and for a short period only. Equipment suitable for use in Zones 0 or 1 may also be used. In Zone 2, Category 3 equipment shall be used which is intended for use in places in which explosive atmospheres caused by gases, vapours or mists are unlikely to occur or, if they do, are likely to do so only infrequently and for a short period only. Equipment suitable for use in Zones 0 or 1 may also be used. Zone 20 Zone 20 In Zone 20, Category 1 equipment shall be used which is intended for use in areas in which explosive atmospheres caused by air/dust mixtures are present continuously, for long periods or frequently In Zone 20, Category 1 equipment shall be used which is intended for use in places in which explosive atmospheres caused by air/dust mixtures are present continuously, for long periods or frequently. 7 OJ No L 100, 19. 4. 1994, p. 1 Page -23 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal Zone 21 Zone 21 In Zone 21, Category 2 equipment shall be used which is intended for use in areas in which explosive atmospheres caused by air/dust mixtures are likely to occur occasionally. Equipment suitable for use in Zone 20 may also be used. In Zone 21, Category 2 equipment shall be used which is intended for use in places in which explosive atmospheres caused by air/dust mixtures are likely to occur occasionally. Equipment suitable for use in Zone 20 may also be used. Zone 22 Zone 22 In Zone 22, Category 3 equipment shall be used which is intended for use in areas in which explosive atmospheres caused by dust raised into the air are unlikely to occur or, if they do, are likely to do so only infrequently and for a short period only. Equipment suitable for use in Zones 20 or 21 may also be used. In Zone 22, Category 3 equipment shall be used which is intended for use in places in which explosive atmospheres caused by air/dust mixtures are unlikely to occur or, if they do, are likely to do so only infrequently and for a short period only. Equipment suitable for use in Zones 20 or 21 may also be used. In accordance with Directive 89/655/EEC, the employer shall ensure that the equipment and installation materials used are suitable for the actual operating and service conditions. Where appropriate, this also applies to working clothes and personal protective equipment. unchanged - Page -24 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal ANNEX III ANNEX III Warning atmospheres may occur, pursuant to Article 5 (3) for places where explosive sign Warning atmospheres may occur, pursuant to Article 5 (3) for places where explosive sign Beware explosive atmospheres! Place where explosive atmospheres may occur Distinctive features: Distinctive features: triangular shape triangular shape black pictogram on a yellow background with black edging (the yellow part to take up at least 50% of the area of the sign). black pictogram on a yellow background with black edging (the yellow part to take up at least 50% of the area of the sign). Page -25 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal ANNEX IV GUIDE CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE OF WORK Installations are considered to be in normal operation when they are performing their intended function within their design parameters. unchanged Zone 0 The presence of workers and performance of work are as a general rule not permissible. unchanged Ignition sources which may become effective during normal operation and even in infrequently occurring cases of malfunction must be avoided. Zone 1 The performance of work during which ignition sources may occur during normal operation is permissible only if the precautions for this zone set out in the explosion protection document are applied. unchanged Ignition sources which may become effective during normal operation and in foreseeable cases of malfunction must be avoided. Zone 2 The performance of work during which ignition sources may occur during normal operation is permissible only if the precautions for this zone set out in the explosion protection document are applied. unchanged Ignition sources which may become effective during normal operation must be avoided. - Page -26 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal Zone 20 The presence of workers and performance of work are as a general rule not permissible. unchanged Ignition sources which may become effective during normal operation and even in infrequently occurring cases of malfunction must be avoided. Zone 21 The performance of work during which ignition sources may occur during normal operation is permissible only if the precautions for this zone set out in the explosion protection document are applied. unchanged Ignition sources which may become effective during normal operation and in foreseeable cases of malfunction must be avoided. Zone 22 The performance of work during which ignition sources may occur during normal operation is permissible only if the precautions for this zone set out in the explosion protection document are applied. unchanged Ignition sources which may become effective during normal operation must be avoided. - Page -27 Original Commission Proposal Modified Proposal ANNEX V NON-EXHAUSTIVE LIST OF SUBJECTS SUPPLEMENTING MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THIS DIRECTIVE AND COVERED VADEMECUM REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 9 THE THE BY unchanged Layout and contents of protection document (see Article 4. 3) the explosion Organisational measures (see Annex II A, section 1) Assessment of explosion risks (see Annex II A, section 2) Planning principles (see Annex II A, section 3) Planning of installations (see Annex II A, section 3) Explosion protection measures (see Annex II, section 4) unchanged up to end. Instructions for the zoning of hazardous places (see Annex I) Information on pertinent standards relating to work equipment Page -28 ISSN 0254-1475 COM(97) 123 final DOCUMENTS EN 04 05 Catalogue number : CB-CO-97-112-EN-C ISBN 92-78-17222-7 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg z<\


title: PERGUNTA ESCRITA n. 1310/97 do Deputado Amedeo AMADEO à Comissão. Agentes patogénicos

eurovoc_concepts:
animal disease
animal product
health certificate
health control
health legislation
import
intra-EU trade
organic fertiliser
poultry

formats: html pdf print

text: C 21/38 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias 22. 1. 98 (98/C 21/113) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-1310/97 apresentada por Amedeo Amadeo (NI) a‘ Comissa(cid:152)o (11 de Abril de 1997) Objecto: Agentes patoge·nicos Proposta de directiva do Conselho que altera a Directiva 92/118/CEE do Conselho, de 17 de Dezembro de 1992, que define as condi(cid:231)o(cid:152)es sanita·rias e de pol(cid:14)·cia sanita·ria que regem o come·rcio e as importa(cid:231)o(cid:152)es na Comunidade de produtos na(cid:152)o sujeitos, no que respeita a‘s referidas condi(cid:231)o(cid:152)es, a‘s regulamenta(cid:231)o(cid:152)es comunita·rias espec(cid:14)·ficas referidas no cap(cid:14)·tulo I do anexo A da Directiva 89/662/CEE e, no que respeita aos agentes patoge·nicos, da Directiva 90/425/CEE (COM(96)393 final › 96/0197(CNS)) (1). A proposta de simplifica(cid:231)a(cid:152)o da directiva na(cid:152)o deve incluir o chorume na(cid:152)o transformado proveniente de aves de capoeira. No que respeita a este tipo de adubo, na(cid:152)o poderia a Comissa(cid:152)o, dados os noto·rios riscos de transmissa(cid:152)o (salmonela, peste avia·ria, doen(cid:231)a de Newcastle), manter a lista comunita·ria? (1) JO C 284 de 27. 9. 1996, p. 18. Resposta dada pelo Comissa·rio Fischler em nome da Comissa(cid:152)o (29 de Maio de 1997) A Comissa(cid:152)o apresentou ao Conselho em 24 de Julho de 1996 uma proposta (1) de directiva do Conselho que altera a Directiva 92/118/CEE do Conselho (2), de 17 de Dezembro de 1992, que define as condi(cid:231)o(cid:152)es sanita·rias e de pol(cid:14)·cia sanita·ria que regem o come·rcio e as importa(cid:231)o(cid:152)es na Comunidade de produtos na(cid:152)o sujeitos, no que respeita a‘s referidas condi(cid:231)o(cid:152)es, a‘s regulamenta(cid:231)o(cid:152)es comunita·rias espec(cid:14)·ficas referidas no cap(cid:14)·tulo I do anexo A da Directiva 89/662/CEE2 e, no que respeita aos agentes patoge·nicos, da Directiva 90/425/CEE2. As exige(cid:136)ncias sanita·rias relativas ao come·rcio e a‘s importa(cid:231)o(cid:152)es de chorumes sa(cid:152)o estabelecidas no cap(cid:14)·tulo 14 do anexo I da Directiva 92/118/CEE, tendo sido alteradas pela Decisa(cid:152)o 96/103/CE (3) com base na experie(cid:136)ncia adquirida. No que se refere ao come·rcio intracomunita·rio de chorumes na(cid:152)o-transformados de aves de capoeira, foram estabelecidas exige(cid:136)ncias sanita·rias relativamente a‘ doen(cid:231)a de Newcastle e a‘ gripe avia·ria. As garantias relativas a‘ doen(cid:231)a de Newcastle e a‘ gripe avia·ria sa(cid:152)o as especificadas pelas directivas 92/40/CEE (4) e 92/66/CEE (5) do Conselho, que estabelecem medidas comunita·rias de luta contra, respectivamente, a gripe avia·ria e a doen(cid:231)a de Newcastle. Ale·m disso, no que toca a‘ doen(cid:231)a de Newcastle, foram estabelecidas garantias suplementares relativamente a‘ regia(cid:152)o de destino no que diz respeito ao estatuto de zona onde «na(cid:152)o e· realizada a vacina(cid:231)a(cid:152)o contra a doen(cid:231)a de Newcastle». O produto deve ainda ser acompanhado de um certificado sanita·rio. A Directiva 92/118/CEE previa a elabora(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de listas dos estabelecimentos dos pa(cid:14)·ses terceiros para efeitos da importa(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de produtos abrangidos pela directiva. A experie(cid:136)ncia adquirida em mate·ria de protec(cid:231)a(cid:152)o da sau·de pu·blica e da sanidade animal permitiu concluir que tais listas na(cid:152)o se justificavam no caso de produtos como as peles de ungulados, os ossos e respectivos produtos na(cid:152)o destinados ao consumo humano ou animal, os produtos ap(cid:14)·colas, os trofe·us de ca(cid:231)a, o chorume, as la(cid:152)s e penas e o mel. Nestas circunsta(cid:136)ncias, e numa perspectiva de simplifica(cid:231)a(cid:152)o, a Comissa(cid:152)o propo(cid:136)s ao Conselho que fosse eliminada a necessidade de elaborar essas listas e se assegurasse o registo dos estabelecimentos pela autoridade competente do pa(cid:14)·s terceiro. Depois de aprovada pelo Parlamento em 25 de Outubro de 1996 (6) no quadro do processo de consulta, a proposta da Comissa(cid:152)o foi adoptada em 17 de Dezembro de 1996 (Directiva 96/90/CE do Conselho (7)). (1) Documento COM (96) 393 final. (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) JO L 62 de 15. 3. 1993. JO L 24 de 31. 1. 1996. JO L 167 de 22. 2. 1992. JO L 260 de 5. 9. 1992. JO C 347 de 18. 11. 1996. JO L 13 de 16. 1. 1997


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1275/97 by Johanna MAIJ-WEGGEN to the Commission. Aid to Guatemala

eurovoc_concepts:
EU aid
EU control
Guatemala
democratisation
financial cooperation
fiscal policy
less-favoured region
technical cooperation
use of aid

formats: html print


title: SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG nr. 1259/97 van Cristiana MUSCARDINI aan de Commissie. Mondialisering en democratie

eurovoc_concepts:
budget policy
budgetary power
company with share capital
competition
economic policy
euro
financial institution
free movement of capital
free movement of goods
political power


title: QUESTION ECRITE no 1305/97 de Amedeo AMADEO à la Commission. Contrôles vétérinaires

eurovoc_concepts:
customs inspection
customs regulations
customs warehouse
free zone
import
third country
veterinary inspection
veterinary legislation

text: 22. 1. 98 FR Journal officiel des Communaute·s europe·ennes C 21/37 L(cid:146)abrogation de la directive 90/675/CEE (2) impose d(cid:146)adapter le texte des directives susmentionne·es dans la deuxie‘me proposition de la Commission, de manie‘re a‘ le rendre compatible avec la nouvelle directive propose·e par le Conseil. La Commission pourrait-elle proce·der a‘ une codification rapide de la le·gislation existante, afin de rendre le texte plus transparent et plus compre·hensible pour les utilisateurs? (1) (2) JO C 245 du 23. 8. 1996, p. 9. JO L 373 du 31. 12. 1990, p. 1. Re·ponse donne·e par M. Fischler au nom de la Commission (29 mai 1997) A l(cid:146)heure actuelle, la Commission n(cid:146)a pas l(cid:146)intention de proce·der a‘ une codification des directives mentionne·es par l(cid:146)Honorable Parlementaire. En revanche, un certain nombre d(cid:146)entre elle (71/118/CEE, 91/492/CEE, 91/493/CEE, 92/45/CEE et 92/118/CEE) font partie inte·grante d(cid:146)un exercice ge·ne·ral visant a‘ regrouper en matie‘re d(cid:146)hygie‘ne alimentaire les directives dites «verticales» en vue d(cid:146)obtenir une le·gislation cohe·rente et plus simple. En ce qui concerne le financement des contro(cid:136)les, le Conseil a adopte· le 26 juin 1996, la directive 96/43/CE modifiant et codifiant la directive 85/73/CEE (1). (1) JO L 162 du 1. 7. 1996. (98/C 21/112) QUESTION E· CRITE E-1305/97 pose·e par Amedeo Amadeo (NI) a‘ la Commission (11 avril 1997) Objet: Contro(cid:136)les ve·te·rinaires La proposition de directive du Conseil COM(96) 170 final › 96/0109/0110 (CNS) (1) modifie les directives 71/118/CEE, 72/462/CEE, 85/73/CEE, 91/67/CEE, 91/492/CEE, 91/493/CEE, 92/45/CEE et 92/118/CEE en ce qui concerne l(cid:146)organisation des contro(cid:136)les ve·te·rinaires pour les produits en provenance des pays tiers introduits dans la Communaute·. La Commission pourrait-elle pre·ciser, dans le texte de la directive › ou encore sans renvoyer a‘ la le·gislation douanie‘re spe·cifique › la compe·tence des autorite·s douanie‘res et les rapports entre les activite·s exerce·es par ces dernie‘res et celles qui sont du ressort des autorite·s ve·te·rinaires? Estime-t-elle ne·cessaire de pre·voir expresse·ment une obligation de collaboration mutuelle entre les deux autorite·s et de confier la surveillance des entrepo(cid:136)ts francs et des entrepo(cid:136)ts douaniers exclusivement a‘ l(cid:146)autorite· douanie‘re compe·tente, et non a‘ l(cid:146)autorite· ve·te·rinaire, comme le pre·voit la proposition de directive? (1) JO C 245 du 23. 8. 1996, p. 9. Re·ponse donne·e par M. Fischler au nom de la Commission (2 juin 1997) Les propositions de directive du Conseil concernant les contro(cid:136)les ve·te·rinaires pour les produits en provenance des pays tiers (1) ont fait l(cid:146)objet d(cid:146)un examen exhaustif au Parlement (session du 17 au 21 fe·vrier 1997). Dans ce cadre, la Commission a accepte· notamment un certain nombre d(cid:146)amendements vote·s par le Parlement visant pour certaines dispositions a‘ clarifier les responsabilite·s respectives des autorite·s douanie‘res et ve·te·rinaires. Sur la question particulie‘re e·voque·e par l(cid:146)Honorable Parlementaire, la Commission a accepte· a‘ l(cid:146)article 12 paragraphe 1 de la proposition de pre·voir que «les autorite·s douanie‘res et les autorite·s ve·te·rinaires responsables du poste d(cid:146)inspection frontalier autorisent l(cid:146)admission dans la zone franche, dans l(cid:146)entrepo(cid:136)t franc ou dans un entrepo(cid:136)t douanier». Il reste que selon l(cid:146)article 12 paragraphe 2, les zones et entrepo(cid:136)ts doivent e(cid:136)tre sous le contro(cid:136)le permanent d(cid:146)un ve·te·rinaire officiel. Cette re‘gle vaut sans pre·judice des obligations re·sultant des re·glementations douanie‘res. Cette position est en accord avec celle exprime·e par le Parlement. (1) doc. COM(96) 170 final


title: SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG nr. 1277/97 van Peter PEX aan de Commissie. Classificering van multimedia producten

eurovoc_concepts:
CCT duties
EU Member State
European Commission
GATT
World Trade Organisation
computer equipment
import
tariff nomenclature
telecommunications
trade agreement


title: PERGUNTA ESCRITA n. 1283/97 do Deputado Hiltrud BREYER à Comissão. Procura de um local para depósito definitivo de resíduos nucleares no Leste da Bélgica e na Lorena

eurovoc_concepts:
Belgium
European Commission
Lorraine
application of EU law
frontier region
radiation protection
radioactive waste
safety standard
storage of waste
waste management


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1311/97 by Amedeo AMADEO to the Commission. Identification of bovine animals and beef products

eurovoc_concepts:
beef
cattle
consumer information
database
labelling
meat product

text: 22. 1. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 21/39 (98/C 21/114) WRITTEN QUESTION E-1311/97 by Amedeo Amadeo (NI) to the Commission (11 April 1997) Subject: Identification of bovine animals and beef products The Commission has submitted a proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and a proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) regarding the labelling of beef and beef products (COM(96) 460 final › 96/0228/0229 CNS) (1) (CES 1404/96 › 96/0228/0229 CNS). The new system will include the labelling of beef and beef products. Although the labelling of such products will be optional, the information that each operator or organization decides to indicate on the label (region of birth, method of fattening, slaughter and feeding details, etc. ) must first be approved by the competent national authorities. Overall, the proposal for a regulation regarding the labelling of beef and beef products is satisfactory, given that it will provide many consumers with the information they require and therefore make a major contribution towards re-establishing confidence in European beef. The Commission is asked to make indication of the origin of beef compulsory since this is only way of restoring consumer confidence in the long term. (1) OJ C 349, 20. 11. 1996, p. 14. Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission (28 May 1997) According to Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97 establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding the labelling of beef and beef products, which was adopted by the Council on 21 April 1997 (1), a compulsory beef labelling system shall be introduced which shall be obligatory in all Member States from 1 January 2000, with the compulsory indications of the Member State or third country where the animal from which the beef is derived was born, the Member States or third countries where the animal was raised and the Member State or third country where the animal was slaughtered. However, this compulsory system shall not exclude the possibility for a Member State to apply the system merely on an optional basis to beef sold in that same Member State. A transitional voluntary labelling system shall be introduced until the end of 1999. In Member States where there is a sufficiently developed identification and registration system for bovine animals, a compulsory labelling system may be introduced before 1 January 2000, for beef from animals born, raised and slaughtered in their territory. (1) OJ L 117, 7. 5. 1997. (98/C 21/115) WRITTEN QUESTION E-1313/97 by Amedeo Amadeo (NI) to the Commission (11 April 1997) Subject: New technologies and employment Following the submission of (cid:145)The impact of the introduction of new technologies on employment(cid:146) (CES 1403/96), it must be said that the ever-increasing impact of new technologies on growth and employment is likely to increase social exclusion and regional marginalization. This situation calls for the introduction of vigorous policies to provide support for less-qualified workers and young people looking for their first job, since these are the most economically vulnerable groups and those most prone to long-term unemployment. Combating marginalization is even more important in respect of those least-favoured regions in which the problems caused by geographical remoteness are aggravated by a lack of proper structures and infrastructure linked up by means of a network with the rest of the European Union, and by technological disparities which are far worse than any economic disparities. In line with the priorities laid down in respect of economic and social cohesion in the EU, responsibility for technological development must be taken at different levels: Community, national and regional. The Commission is therefore asked to combine action under the Community(cid:146)s R&TD policy with Structural Fund operations as effectively as possible


title: INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA n. 1289/97 dell'on. Caroline JACKSON alla Commissione. Messa a riposo dei terreni agricoli

eurovoc_concepts:
EU Member State
United Kingdom
agricultural production policy
agricultural statistics
aid per hectare
cereals
oleaginous plant
policy on agricultural structures
set-aside
utilised agricultural area


title: SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL nr. 1274/97 af Cristiana MUSCARDINI til Kommissionen. Et lille dådyr dræbes på grusom måde udelukkende af kolde bureaukratiske årsager, der er mere end diskutable

eurovoc_concepts:
Italy
animal life
competence of the Member States
hunting
protection of animals
slaughter of animals


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1306/97 by Amedeo AMADEO to the Commission. Safety regime for fishing vessels

eurovoc_concepts:
Council of the European Union
EC Directive
fishing vessel
maritime safety
occupational health
occupational safety
proposal (EU)
technical regulations


title: INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA n. 1271/97 dell'on. Roberta ANGELILLI alla Commissione. Progetto di costruzione della linea C della metropolitana di Roma

eurovoc_concepts:
Latium
administrative transparency
environmental impact
impact study
underground railway
urban construction


title: ΓΡΑΠΤΗ ΕΡΩΤΗΣΗ αρ θ. 1292/97 του Bill MILLER προς την Επ τροπή. Συνθήκες απασχόλησης στην ΕΕ

eurovoc_concepts:
Andorra
Channel Islands
EU national
Holy See
Isle of Man
Monaco
San Marino
free movement of persons
free movement of workers
work permit


title: Resolution on the Commission report to the European Parliament and the Council on the state of application of the general system for the recognition of higher education diplomas (made in accordance with Article 13 of Directive 89/48/EEC)(COM(96)0046 C4-0194/96)

eurovoc_concepts:
application of EU law
free movement of workers
higher education
recognition of diplomas
vocational training


title: QUESTION ECRITE no 1292/97 de Bill MILLER à la Commission. Conditions d'emploi au sein de l'UE


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1309/97 by Amedeo AMADEO to the Commission. European Agency for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Inspection

eurovoc_concepts:
EU office or agency
consumer protection
food inspection
foodstuffs legislation
import
plant health control
public health
third country
veterinary inspection


title: PREGUNTA ESCRITA n. 1263/97 del Nikitas KAKLAMANIS a la Comisión. Normas relativas a la importación a Grecia de vehículos pesados de segunda mano

eurovoc_concepts:
Greece
commercial vehicle
free movement of goods
import restriction
infringement of EU law
infringement procedure (EU)
sale
trade regulations
used goods


title: Η μάθηση στην κοινωία των πληροφοριών : Σχέδιο δράσης για μια ευρωπαϊκή πρωτοβουλία στον τομέα της εκπαίδευσης (1996-1998).

eurovoc_concepts:
action programme
information technology
teaching


title: SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL nr. 1268/97 af Alessandro DANESIN til Kommissionen. Annullering af bidraget til 1996- festivalen "Cartoons on the bay"

eurovoc_concepts:
Campania
Community budget
EU aid
EU programme
European Commission
cultural event
cultural policy
eligibility criteria
film production
suspension of aid


title: PREGUNTA ESCRITA n. 1266/97 del Clive NEEDLE a la Comisión. Evaluación de los programas del Objetivo 5b

eurovoc_concepts:
EU Member State
EU body
EU programme
Structural Funds
project evaluation
regional policy
regions of the United Kingdom


title: PREGUNTA ESCRITA n. 1300/97 del Vincenzo VIOLA a la Comisión. Transparencia sobre la denuncia presentada a la Comisión sobre el proyecto de realización de un depósito sobre el Rio di Monte Nieddu, Cerdeña, Italia

eurovoc_concepts:
European Regional Development Fund
Sardinia
administrative transparency
engineering structure
environmental impact
environmental protection
hydraulic works
public works
report
technical barrier


title: SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG nr. 1292/97 van Bill MILLER aan de Commissie. EU-arbeidsvoorwaarden


title: SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE Nr. 1324/97 von Mark WATTS an die Kommission. Schiffsunfälle mit Ro-Ro-Fähren seit 1985

eurovoc_concepts:
European Commission
exchange of information
ferryboat
maritime transport
transport accident
transport safety


title: SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE Nr. 1291/97 von Bill MILLER an die Kommission. Mitgliedstaaten der EU

eurovoc_concepts:
Andorra
Channel Islands
EU law
Holy See
Isle of Man
Monaco
San Marino
customs regulations
customs territory (EU)


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1300/97 by Vincenzo VIOLA to the Commission. Transparency and the memorandum submitted to the Commission on the project for the construction of a reservoir on the Rio di Monte Nieddu in Sardinia, Italy


title: PERGUNTA ESCRITA n. 1323/97 do Deputado Mark WATTS à Comissão. Aplicação de medidas de segurança aos ferries

eurovoc_concepts:
carriage of passengers
ferryboat
international transport
maritime safety
maritime transport
national transport
prevention of pollution
safety standard
transport accident


title: INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA n. 1320/97 dell'on. Gerhard SCHMID alla Commissione. Importo massimo per la responsabilità dei gestori di centrali nucleari

eurovoc_concepts:
State aid
civil liability
damages
electrical energy
insurance
nuclear accident
nuclear power station
restriction on competition

text: C 60/18 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunita‘ europee 25. 2. 98 Lo stesso ministero, conformemente all(cid:146)articolo 5 del regolamento n. 4254/88 concernente il Fondo europeo di sviluppo regionale, modificato dal regolamento (CEE) n. 2083/93 (3) ha presentato alla Commissione, in data 21 marzo 1997, una domanda di finanziamento per le dighe dei «Rii Monte Nieddu e Is Canargius» per un costo totale di 62 milioni di ecu. Questa domanda di finanziamento e‘ attualmente all(cid:146)esame della Commissione. (1) GU L 175 del 5. 7. 1985. (2) GU L 206 del 22. 7. 1992. (3) GU L 193 del 31. 7. 1993. (98/C 60/37) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-1320/97 di Gerhard Schmid (PSE) alla Commissione (11 aprile 1997) Oggetto: Importo massimo per la responsabilita‘ dei gestori di centrali nucleari La legge tedesca sull(cid:146)energia nucleare stabilisce, all(cid:146)articolo 13, par. 3, che la responsabilita‘ per il risarcimento danni da parte del gestore di una centrale nucleare e‘ limitata a 500 milioni di DM. I danni prevedibili in caso di grave incidente in una centrale nucleare sarebbero di molto superiori e lo Stato dovrebbe quindi integrare il risarcimento. Si chiede alla Commissione: 1. Tale norma costituisce un aiuto statale indiretto che deve essere autorizzato? 2. Rappresenta una distorsione della concorrenza nei confronti di altri produttori di energia? Risposta data dal Sig. Van Miert a nome della Commissione (4 giugno 1997) Le disposizioni riguardanti la responsabilita‘ per danni nucleari della legge tedesca sull(cid:146)energia atomica non sono in disaccordo con le convenzioni internazionali esistenti della responsabilita‘ civile in campo nucleare, per quel che riguarda il risarcimento parziale dei danni da parte dello Stato. In base alla Convenzione di Vienna sulla responsabilita‘ civile per i danni nucleari e alla Convenzione di Parigi sulla responsabilita‘ civile nel settore dell(cid:146)energia nucleare, il gestore di una centrale nucleare e‘ tenuto a fornire lo strumento finanziario che copre la responsabilita‘ per i danni nucleari d(cid:146)importo precisato dallo Stato della centrale. Tale strumento puo‘ essere fornito mediante assicurazione o altra sicurezza finanziaria, ad esempio una garanzia dello Stato. La Convenzione di Bruxelles, supplementare alla Convenzione di Parigi, cui e‘ parte la Repubblica Federale di Germania, come la maggior parte degli Stati membri, richiede espressamente che, a partire da una certa cifra e fino ad massimale stabilito, il risarcimento dei danni nucleari sia offerto dai fondi pubblici da rendere disponibili in primo luogo dalla parte contraente del luogo dove si trova la centrale nucleare dell(cid:146)operatore e per la parte al di sopra di tale cifra dalle parti contraenti alla Convenzione secondo una formula convenuta. Pertanto, la disposizione in questione non sembra costituire un aiuto di stato nel senso dell(cid:146)articolo 92 del trattato CE. E‘ basata su un accordo internazionale che stabilisce un sistema di garanzia generalmente applicabile per i rischi da attivita‘ nucleari. Ogni settore energetico e‘ soggetto a certe norme di sicurezza o di difesa dell(cid:146)ambiente che corrispondono alle caratteristiche delle diverse fonti di energia. Tuttavia, anche se considerate come aiuto di Stato le disposizioni probabilmente rientrerebbero nella deroga dell(cid:146)articolo 92, paragrafo 2, lettera b, poiche· intendono compensare il danno causato da eventi eccezionali. (98/C 60/38) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-1421/97 di Anita Pollack (PSE) alla Commissione (23 aprile 1997) Oggetto: Risparmi di energia in Ucraina Dato che alcune fonti sostengono che l(cid:146)efficienza energetica ucraina si aggira attorno al 30% della media dell(cid:146)OCSE, cosa conta di fare la UE per intraprendere/finanziare o avviare congiuntamente azioni per il risparmio di energia in quel paese?


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1295/97 by Richard HOWITT to the Commission. EC Energy Centre, Katowice

eurovoc_concepts:
EU financing
Poland
action programme
aid system
energy technology
international cooperation


title: SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL nr. 1315/97 af Cristiana MUSCARDINI til Kommissionen. Overtrædelse af fællesskabsbestemmelserne om miljøindvirkning i forbindelse med et anlæg til forbehandling og midlertidig oplagring af skadeligt giftigt affald i Campolungo (Ascoli Piceno)

eurovoc_concepts:
EU aid
EU control
European Commission
Marches
environmental impact
impact study
industrial waste
storage of waste
waste management


title: PERGUNTA ESCRITA n. 1295/97 do Deputado Richard HOWITT à Comissão. Centro de Energia da CE em Katowice


title: QUESTION ECRITE no 1297/97 de Bárbara DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP à la Commission. Accord de pêche avec la Nouvelle-Zélande et d'autres pays

eurovoc_concepts:
Council of the European Union
European Commission
European Union
New Zealand
fishing agreement
international negotiations
third country


title: PREGUNTA ESCRITA n. 1275/97 del Johanna MAIJ-WEGGEN a la Comisión. Ayudas a Guatemala

eurovoc_concepts:
EU aid
EU control
Guatemala
democratisation
financial cooperation
fiscal policy
less-favoured region
technical cooperation
use of aid


title: PREGUNTA ESCRITA n. 1310/97 del Amedeo AMADEO a la Comisión. Patógenos

eurovoc_concepts:
animal disease
animal product
health certificate
health control
health legislation
import
intra-EU trade
organic fertiliser
poultry

text: C 21/38 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 22. 1. 98 (98/C 21/113) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-1310/97 de Amedeo Amadeo (NI) a la Comisio·n (11 de abril de 1997) Asunto: Pato·genos En relacio·n con la propuesta de Directiva del Consejo por la que se modifica la Directiva 92/118/CEE del Consejo, de 17 de diciembre de 1992, por la que se establecen las condiciones de polic(cid:14)·a sanitaria y sanitarias aplicables a los intercambios y a las importaciones en la Comunidad de productos no sometidos, con respecto a estas condiciones, a las normativas comunitarias espec(cid:14)·ficas a que se refiere el cap(cid:14)·tulo I del Anexo A de la Directiva 89/662/CEE y, por lo que se refiere a los pato·genos, de la Directiva 90/425/CEE (COM(96)393 final (1) › 96/0197 CNS), Se considera que la propuesta de simplificacio·n de la directiva no deber(cid:14)·a referirse al estie·rcol semil(cid:14)·quido no transformado procedente de aves. Por lo que respecta a este tipo de abono, a la vista de los riesgos de transmisio·n de enfermedades (salmonela, peste aviar, enfermedad de Newcastle, etc. ), ¿podr(cid:14)·a la Comisio·n mantener la lista comunitaria? (1) DO C 284 de 27. 9. 1996, p. 18. Respuesta del Sr. Fischler en nombre de la Comisio·n (29 de mayo de 1997) El 24 de julio de 1996, la Comisio·n presento· al Consejo una propuesta de Directiva del Consejo (1) que modifica la Directiva 92/118/CEE del Consejo, de 17 de diciembre de 1992, por la que se establecen las condiciones de polic(cid:14)·a sanitaria y sanitarias aplicables a los intercambios y a las importaciones en la Comunidad de productos no sometidos, con respecto a estas condiciones, a las normativas comunitarias espec(cid:14)·ficas a que se refiere el cap(cid:14)·tulo I del Anexo A de la Directiva 89/662/CEE y, por lo que se refiere a los pato·genos, de la Directiva 90/425/CEE (2). Los requisitos sanitarios aplicables al comercio y a las importaciones de estie·rcol semil(cid:14)·quido figuran en el Cap(cid:14)·tulo 14 del Anexo I de la Directiva 92/118/CEE y han sido modificados por la Decisio·n 96/103/CE (3) de acuerdo con la experiencia adquirida. En lo que respecta al comercio intracomunitario de estie·rcol de aves de corral no elaborado, se enumeran los requisitos sanitarios en relacio·n con la enfermedad de Newcastle y la influenza aviar. Las garant(cid:14)·as relativas a la enfermedad de Newcastle y la influenza aviar figuran, respectivamente, en las Directivas 92/40/CEE (4) y 92/66/CEE (5) del Consejo, por las que se establecen medidas comunitarias de lucha contra la influenza aviar y la enfermedad de Newcastle. Adema·s, en relacio·n con esta u·ltima, se establecen garant(cid:14)·as suplementarias relativas a la regio·n de destino con respecto al estatuto de no vacunacio·n de la enfermedad de Newcastle. El producto debe ir acompan(cid:152)ado adema·s de un certificado sanitario. La Directiva 92/118/CEE establec(cid:14)·a la elaboracio·n de listas de establecimientos de terceros pa(cid:14)·ses para las importaciones de productos contemplados en la Directiva. La experiencia ha demostrado que, en materia de proteccio·n de la salud pu·blica y animal, dichas listas no se justificaban en el caso de determinados productos, como las pieles de ungulados, los huesos y productos o·seos que no se destinen al consumo humano o animal, los productos ap(cid:14)·colas, los trofeos de caza, el estie·rcol, las lanas y plumas o la miel. Por lo tanto, en aras de la simplificacio·n, la Comisio·n propuso al Consejo que se suprimiera la obligacio·n de elaborar dichas listas y que se cerciorase del registro de los establecimientos por parte de la autoridad competente del tercer pa(cid:14)·s. La propuesta de la Comisio·n fue adoptada el 17 de diciembre de 1996 por la Directiva 96/90/CE del Consejo (6) tras ser aprobada por el Parlamento el 25 de octubre de 1996 (7) de acuerdo con el procedimiento de consulta. (1) COM(96)393 final. (2) DO L 62 de 15. 3. 1993. (3) DO L 24 de 31. 1. 1996. (4) DO L 167 de 22. 2. 1992. (5) DO L 260 de 5. 9. 1992. (6) DO L 13 de 16. 1. 1997. (7) DO C 347 de 18. 11. 1996


title: SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG nr. 1276/97 van Marianne THYSSEN aan de Commissie. Stopzetting van de vertaling van het Europees tijdschrift "Beroepsopleiding" naar alle officiële talen van de Europese Unie

eurovoc_concepts:
Cedefop
EU Member State
EU publication
exchange of information
official language
operating cost
publishing
translation
use of languages
vocational training