title: Amended proposal for a Council Decision concerning the signing and conclusion of an Agreement on international humane trapping standards between the European Community, Canada, and the Russian Federation

eurovoc_concepts:
Canada
Russia
hunting regulations
international standard
protection of animals

formats: html pdf pdfa1b print

text: COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 29. 05. 1997 COM(97)251 final 97/0019(CNS) Amended proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION concerning the signing and conclusion of an Agreement on International Humane Trapping Standards between the European Community, Canada, and the Russian Federation. (presented by the Commission pursuant to Article 189 a (2) of the EC-Treaty) Amended proposal for a Council Decision concerning the signing and conclusion of an International Agreement between the European Community, Canada and the Russian Federation on humane trapping standards Explanatory memorandum 1. 2. 3. A proposal for a Council Decision concerning the signing and conclusion of an International Agreement between the European Community, Canada and the Russian Federation on humane trapping standards was laid before the Council on 27 January. This agreement complied with the negotiating directives the Council adopted in June 1996. On 24 February the Council adopted conclusions calling on the Commission to do what it could to recontact Canada and the Russian Federation and obtain certain amendments in line with specific recommendations and suggestions put forward by the Council. An amended agreement was initialled on 21 May by the Commission and Canada, and on 2 June by the Russian Federation. The text, which is annexed to this amended proposal for a Decision, complies with the negotiating directives adopted by the Council in June 1996 and is in line with the additional suggestions it put forward on 24 February. •U Modified proposal for a Council Decision concerning the signing and conclusion of an Agreement between the European Community, Canada and the Russian Federation on international humane trapping standards THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 113 and 100a in conjunction with the first part of Article 228(3) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament, Having regard to the Council's decision of June 1996 authorizing the Commission to negotiate an agreement on humane trapping standards with Canada, the Russian Federation, the United States of America and any other country interested; Whereas Council Regulation (EEC) No 3254/91,1 and in particular the second indent of Article 3(1) thereof, refers to internationally agreed humane trapping standards with which trapping methods used by third countries that have not prohibited leghold traps must conform in order for those countries to be able to export pelts and products manufactured from certain species to the Community; international humane trapping standard had been established on Whereas no 1 January 1996, whereas this situation meant that countries had no way of guaranteeing that the methods used on their territory for trapping the species listed in Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 3254/91 complied with internationally agreed humane trapping standards, Having regard to the proposal for a Regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No 3254/91 transmitted to the Council on 12 January 1996,*- Whereas the Agreement annexed to this Decision is consistent with the negotiating directives referred to above, whereas it therefore satisfies the concept of internationally agreed humane trapping standards referred to in the second indent of Article 3(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 3254/91; Whereas the Agreement's main purpose is to lay down harmonized technical standards offering a sufficient level of protection to the welfare of trapped animals and governing both the production and use of traps, and to facilitate trade between the Parties in traps, pelts and products manufactured from species covered by the Agreement; 1 OJNoL308. 9. 11. 1991. p. 1. 2 COM(95)737 final. 15. 12. 1995. H Whereas implementation of the Agreement requires the establishment of a timetable for testing and certifying the conformity of traps with the standards laid down and for the replacement of uncertified traps, Whereas the Agreement between the European Community, Canada and the Russian Federation on humane trapping standards should be approved, HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS: Article 1 The Agreement between the European Community, Canada and the Russian Federation on humane trapping standards is hereby approved. The text of the Agreement is annexed to this Decision along with the declarations to be lodged when the Agreement is signed. Article 2 The President of the Council is hereby authorized to appoint the person authorized to sign the Agreement. Done at Brussels, For the Council The President /It AGREEMENT ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANE TRAPPING STANDARDS The European Community, The Government of Canada, and The Government of the Russian Federation, parties to this Agreement (the "Parties"), Recalling their deep commitment to the development of international humane trapping standards that are based on scientific research as well as empirical and practical evidence; Reaffirming that each Party has, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the sovereign right to exploit its own resources pursuant to its own environmental and developmental policies and that each Party is responsible for conserving its biological diversity and for using its biological resources in a sustainable manner; Acknowledging that the sustainable use of wild animals for human benefit is in keeping with the principles of the World Conservation Strategy, the World Commission on Environment and Development and the UN Conference on Environment and Development; Noting the commitment, also undertaken by the Member States of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) at its 18th General Assembly in Resolution 18. 25, to eliminate as soon as practicable the use of inhumane traps; Recognizing that the process of developing international humane standards for the trapping of mammals undertaken by ISO, the International Organization for Standardization, in 1987, is not yet complete; Acknowledging that a primary purpose of any international technological standard is to, inter alia, improve communication and facilitate trade; Acknowledging the considerable research carried out, in particular in Canada, the United States of America, the Russian Federation and the European Community, towards the evolution of more humane, practical trapping methods; Underscoring the considerable work carried out by the working group on the development of international humane trapping standards that was composed of experts from Canada, the United States of America^ the Russian Federation and the European Community;. 1 & Appreciating that, despite the absence of international humane trapping standards, a number of jurisdictions have followed different approaches and introduced legislation to improve trapping methods and the welfare of wild animals; and Recognizing that the internal constitutional and institutional rules of each Party determine the primary authority for the implementation of the Humane Trapping Standards within its jurisdiction; Agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 Definitions For the purpose of this Agreement: "Traps" means both killing and restraining mechanical capturing devices, as appropriate. "Trapping Methods" means traps and their setting conditions (e. g. target species, positioning, lure, bait and natural environmental conditions). "Humane Trapping Methods" means the traps certified by competent authorities that are in conformity with the Humane Trapping Standards (the "Standards", found in Annex I to this Agreement) and used in the setting conditions specified by the manufacturers. ARTICLE 2 Objectives The objectives of this Agreement are to: a) b) establish standards on humane trapping methods; improve communication and cooperation between implementation and development of these standards; and the Parties for the c) facilitate trade between the Parties. _ i. ARTICLE 3 Scope This Agreement applies to trapping methods and the certification of traps for the trapping of wild terrestrial or semi-aquatic mammals listed in Annex I for: a) b) c) wildlife management purposes including pest control; obtaining fur, skin or meat; and the capture of mammals for conservation. ARTICLE 4 Obligations under other international agreements Nothing in this Agreement affects the rights and obligations of those Parties that are Members of the World Trade Organization under the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization. For Parties that are not Members of the WTO, nothing in this Agreement affects their rights and obligations under bilateral agreements listed in Annex II between the Parties. ARTICLE 5 Existing Measures A Party may continue to prohibit the use, in its territory, of traps that had been prohibited for use at the date of entry into force of this Agreement. ARTICLE 6 International Cooperation Without prejudice to Article 9, the Parties agree to: a) b) cooperate with one another, directly or through competent international organizations, in respect of matters of mutual interest related to this Agreement; and develop and enhance multilateral cooperation in the field of humane trapping methods on the basis of mutual benefits and the desire to facilitate trade. - 3- ARTICLE 7 Commitment of the Parties Each Party shall take the necessary steps, in accordance with the schedule in Annex I, to ensure that its respective competent authorities: a) b) c) d) establish appropriate processes for certifying traps in accordance with the Standards; ensure that the trapping methods conducted in their respective territories are in accordance with the Standards; prohibit the use of traps that are not certified in accordance with the Standards;1 and require manufacturers to identify certified traps and provide instructions for their appropriate setting, safe operation and maintenance. ARTICLE 8 Implementation of the Standards In implementing the Standards, each competent authority of the Parties should use its best efforts to ensure that: a) appropriate processes are in place for : i) ii) granting or removing permission for the use of traps, and enforcing legislation on humane trapping methods; b) c) trappers are trained in the humane, safe and effective use of trapping methods, including new methods as these are developed; and the trap testing guidelines as set out in Annex I are taken into account when establishing domestic certification processes. The Parties agree that Article 7 does not prevent individuals from constructing and using traps, provided that such traps comply with designs approved by the relevant competent authority. -4 ARTICLE 9 Ongoing development of the Standards The Parties shall: a) b) promote and encourage research aimed at the ongoing development of the Standards; and re-evaluate and update Annex I, the first time 3 years after the entry into force of this Agreement, using in particular the results of the research referred to in subparagraph (a). ARTICLE 10 Derogations 1. 2. 3. Derogations to the commitments referred to in Article 7 may be granted by the competent authority on a case-by-case basis, provided that they are not applied in a manner that would undermine the objectives of the Agreement, for any of the following purposes: a) b) c) d) the interests of public health and safety; protection of public and private property; research, education, repopulation, re-introduction, breeding or for the protection of fauna and flora; and using traditional wooden traps essential for preserving cultural heritage of indigenous communities. Derogations granted under paragraph 1 must be accompanied by written reasons and conditions. The Parties shall notify the Joint Management Committee in writing of the derogations granted under paragraph 1 and the written reasons and conditions referred to in paragraph 2. -5 1. 2. 1. 2. 1. 2. ARTICLE 11 Notification and Exchange of information The Parties shall regularly exchange information on all matters related to tfaeir implementauon of this Agreement. They shall inform each other on the progress of the work done concerning the evaluation of the traps carried out in the application of the schedule set forth in Annex I, on related research and on certified traps. The Parties shall notify each other of the competent authorities that are responsible for the implementation of this Agreement. ARTICLE 12 Mutual Recognition A Party may authorize the use in its territory of traps certified by another Party. Any refusal must be justified in writing. Each Party shall recognize the trapping methods of any other Party as equivalent if the other Party's trapping methods meet the Standards. ARTICLE 13 Trade in fur and fur products between the Parties Without prejudice to Article 15 and paragraph 2 of this Article, and the relevant provisions of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), done at Washington on 3 March 1973, no Party may impose trade restrictive measures on fur and fur products originating from any other Party. At the point of importation into its customs territory, a Party may request a certificate of origin that: a) b) certifies that the furs or furs incorporated into products to be imported have been obtained from animals that are caught or farmed in the territory of any other Party; and includes a reference to a documentation of origin issued by the competent authorities. 6- 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. ARTICLE 14 Joint Management Committee The Parties shall establish a Joint Management Committee (the "Committee") comprising representatives of the Parties. The Committee may consider any matters relating to this Agreement. The Committee shall meet within 12 months after the date of entry into force of this Agreement. The Committee shall. meet periodically thereafter or at the request of any Party. The Committee may also address issues between its meetings by correspondence. The Committee shall adopt its rules of procedure at its first meeting. Decisions of the Committee shall be reached by consensus. The Committee may, from time to time, establish ad hoc scientific and technical expert working groups to make recommendations to the Committee regarding: a) b) c) any scientific and technical matters; questions of interpretation as proposed by the Parties; and recommendations on the resolution of disagreements. The Committee may propose to the Parties amendments to this Agreement, taking into account, as appropriate, the relevant recommendations of expert working groups. ARTICLE 15 Settlement of disputes The Parties shall endeavour to arrive at a mutually satisfactory resolution of any matter that may affect the operation of this Agreement through negotiations. Where the Parties concerned are unable to resolve their differences, the Committee shall be convened, at the request of one of the Parties, for discussion and resolution. The Committee, when addressing the issue put to its consideration, may establish, if appropriate, an ad hoc scientific and/or technical working group in accordance with Article 14. 4 of this Agreement. 7- 2. 3. 4. 5. If the Committee fails to resolve the dispute within ninety (90) days, on the request of the complaining Party an Arbitration Body shall be established pursuant to Annex HL The Arbitration Body may issue rulings in respect of any dispute concerning the interpretation and application by the Party complained against of the Agreement. The Arbitration Body shall not exceed the terms of reference agreed to by the Parties and shall not issue a ruling beyond the scope provided for in this Article. This Article is applicable mutatis mutandis to cases where there is more than one complaining or responding Party. ARTICLE 16 Accession Any country may accede to this Agreement, subject to the terms and conditions as may be agreed between such country and the Parties. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ARTICLE 17 Final Provisions The Annexes are an integral part of this Agreement. This Agreement enters into force sixty (60) days following the date of the deposit of the last instrument of ratification, conclusion or adoption, according to the rules applicable for each Party. This Agreement is not self-executing. Each Party shall implement the commitments and obligations arising from this Agreement in accordance with its internal procedures. Amendments to this Agreement may be proposed by the Committee, or by any Party at any time. Any amendment agreed to by the Parties enters into force on the day following the deposit of the last instrument of ratification, conclusion or adoption of the agreed amendment, according to the rules applicable for each Party. A Party may withdraw from this Agreement by giving at least six months' notice in writing. In such an event, the obligations under this Agreement as regards the withdrawing Party shall come to an end on the expiry of the period of notice. This Agreement is drawn up in the Danish, German, English, Finnish, French, Dutch, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, Swedish and Russian languages, all texts being equally authentic. This Agreement will be deposited in the archives of the Secretariat of the Council of the European Union, which shall deliver a certified copy thereof to each Party. 9- ANNEXES TO THE AGREEMENT ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANE TRAPPING STANDARDS ANNEX I PARTI : THE STANDARDS 1. AIMS, PRINCIPLES AND GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS OF THE STANDARDS 1. 1. AIMS The aim of the Standards is to ensure a sufficient level of welfare of trapped animals, and to further improve this welfare. 1. 2. PRINCIPLES 1. 2. 1. 1. 2. 2. 1. 2. 3. In the evaluation of whether or not a trapping method is humane, the welfare of a trapped animal must be assessed. The principle for deciding that a trapping method is humane is that it meets the threshold requirements set out in sections 2 and 3. It is assumed in setting the Standards that traps should be selective, efficient and in compliance with the relevant requirements for human safety of each Party. 1. 3. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 1. 3. 1. Welfare of animals is indicated by measures of the extent of ease or difficulty in their coping with the environment and the extent of failure to cope with their environment. Since animals vary in the methods that they use to try to cope with their environment, a range of measures should be used when assessing their welfare. Indicators of welfare of trapped animals include those of physiology, injury and behaviour. Since some of these indicators have not been studied for a variety of species, further scientific studies will be necessary to set thresholds under these Standards, as appropriate. Although welfare can vary widely, the term "humane" is used only for those trapping methods where the welfare of the animals concerned is maintained at a sufficient level, although it is acknowledged that in certain situations with killing traps there will be a short period of time during which the level of welfare may be poor. 10- 1. 3. 2. The thresholds established in the Standards for the certification of traps include: a) b) for restraining traps: the level of indicators beyond which the welfare of trapped animals is considered poor; and for killing traps: the time to unconsciousness and insensibility and the maintenance of this state until death of the animal. 1. 3. 3. s Notwithstanding that the trapping methods must meet the requirements of sections 2. 4 and 3. 4, consideration should be given to continuing the improvement of the design and setting of traps, in particular to: a) b) improving the welfare of animals trapped in restraining traps during the period of restraint; producing rapid onset of unconsciousness and insensibility of animals trapped in killing traps; and c) minimizing the capture of non-target animals. 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR RESTRAINING TRAPPING METHODS 2. 1. DEFINITION "Restraining Trapping Methods" means traps designed and set with the intention of not killing the trapped animal, but restraining its movements to such an extent that a human can make direct contact with it. 2. 2. PARAMETERS 2. 2. 1. 2. 2. 2. In the evaluation of whether or not a restraining trapping method meets these Standards the welfare of an animal that is trapped must be assessed. The parameters must include indicators of behaviour and injury listed in paragraphs 2. 3. 1 and 2. 3. 2. 2. 2. 3. The magnitude of responses for each of those parameters must be assessed. 11 - 2. 3. INDICATORS 2. 3. 1. Behavioral indicators recognized as indicators of poor welfare in trapped wild animals are: a) b) self-directed biting leading to severe injury (self-mutilation); excessive immobility and unresponsiveness. 2. 3. 2. Injuries recognized as indicators of poor welfare in trapped wild animals are: a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) j) k) 1) m) n) fracture; joint luxation proximal to the carpus or tarsus; severance of a tendon or ligament; major periosteal abrasion; severe external haemorrhage or haemorrhage into an internal cavity; major skeletal muscle degeneration; limb ischemia; fracture of a permanent tooth exposing pulp cavity; ocular damage including corneal laceration; spinal cord injury; severe internal organ damage; myocardial degeneration; amputation; death. 2. 4. THRESHOLDS A restraining trapping method would meet the Standards if : a) b) the number of specimens of the same target species from which the data are derived is at least 20; and at least 80 per cent of these animals show none of the indicators listed in paragraphs 2. 3. 1 and 2. 3. 2. 3. REQUIREMENTS FOR KILLING TRAPPING METHODS 3. 1. DEFINITION "Killing Trapping Methods" means traps designed and set with the intention of killing a trapped animal of the target species. 12 3. 2. PARAMETERS 3. 2. 1. The time of occurrence of unconsciousness and insensibility produced by the killing technique must be determined and the maintenance of this state until death must be checked (i. e. , until heart function has ceased irreversibly). 3. 2. 2. Unconsciousness and insensibility must be monitored by checking corneal and palpebral reflexes or any other scientifically proven suitable substitute parameter. 2 3. 3. INDICATORS AND TIME LIMITS Time limit to loss of corneal and palpebral reflexes Species 45 seconds 120 seconds 300 seconds" Mustela erminea Martes americana Martes zibellina Martes martes all other species set out in paragraph 4. 1 • • —• — " • '• "• •!•. — •— • • —•. i n — —. , , ,1 1. I II. — i i— — —— i M • — ^ ^ — — —— • — — —— limn. i —J 3. 4. THRESHOLDS A killing trapping method would meet the Standards if: a) b) the number of specimens of the same target species from which the data are derived is at least 12; and at least 80 percent of these animals are unconscious and insensible within the time limit, and remain in this state until death. In cases where further tests are necessary to determine if the trapping method meets the standards, additional electro-encephalogram (EEG), visual evoked response (VER) and sound evoked response (SER) measurements may be made. The Committee will evaluate the time limit at the three-year review referred to in Article 9(b). where data warrants such action, to adapt the time limit requirement on a species-by-species basis, with a view to lowering the 300 second time limit to 180 seconds, and to define a reasonable time-frame for implementation. - 13- PART II: LIST OF SPECIES AND IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE 4. LIST OF SPECIES REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 3 OF THE AGREEMENT AND THE IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE 4. 1. SPECIES LIST The Standards apply to the following species: Common name : Coyote Wolf Beaver (North American) Beaver (European) Bobcat Otter (North American) Otter (European) Lynx (North American) Lynx (European) Marten Fisher Sable Pine marten Badger (European) Ermine Raccoon dog Muskrat Raccoon Badger (North American) Species Canis latrans Canis lupus Castor canadensis Castor fiber Felis rufus Lutra canadensis Lutra lutra Lynx canadensis Lynx lynx Martes americana Martes pennanti Martes zibellina Martes martes Mêles mêles Miistela erminea Nyctereutes procyonoides Ondatra zibethicus Procyon lot or Taxidea taxas Additional species will be included in the future as appropriate. 14 4. 2. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE 4. 2. 1. As referred to in Article 7 of the Agreement trapping methods must be tested to demonstrate their conformity with these Standards, and certified as such by the competent authorities of the Parties, within: a) for restraining trapping methods, 3 to 5 years after the entry into force of the Agreement, depending on the testing priorities and availability of testing facilities; and b) for killing trapping methods, 5 years after the entry into force of the Agreement. 4. 2. 2. 4. 2. 3. In accordance with Article 7 of the Agreement, within three years after the end of the periods referred to in 4. 2. 1 the use of traps that are not certified in accordance with these Standards must be prohibited by the respective competent authorities of the Parties. Where a competent authority determines that the results of trap testing do not support the certification of traps for specific species or under specific environmental conditions, a competent authority may continue to permit the use of traps on an interim basis while research continues to identify replacement traps. The competent authority shall give prior notification to the other Parties to the Agreement of the traps to be authorized for interim use and the status of the research programme. - 15 PART III : GUIDELINES 5. GUIDELINES FOR THE TESTING OF TRAPS AND RESEARCH ON THE ONGOING DEVELOPMENT OF TRAPPING METHODS To ensure accuracy and reliability, and to demonstrate that trapping methods fulfil the requirements set out in the Standards, studies for testing those trapping methods should follow the general principles of good experimental practices. In the event that testing procedures are established under the framework of ISO, the International Organization for Standardization, and that such procedures are relevant for the assessment of the conformity of trapping methods with some or all the requirements of the Standards, the ISO procedures shall be used as appropriate. 5. 1. GENERAL GUIDELINES 5. 1. 1. Tests should be performed according to comprehensive study protocols. 5. 1. 2. The functioning of the trap mechanism should be tested. 5. 1. 3. 5. 1. 4. Testing of traps in the field should be carried out in particular for the assessment of selectivity. This test can also be used to collect data on capture efficiency and user safety. Restraining traps should be tested in a compound, in particular to evaluate behavioral and physiological parameters. Killing traps should be tested in a compound, in particular to identify unconsciousness. 5. 1. 5. In field tests, traps should be checked daily. 5. 1. 6. The effectiveness of killing traps to render the target animal unconscious and kill it should be tested on conscious, mobile animals, by laboratory or compound and field measurements. The ability of the trap to strike the target animal at vital locations should be evaluated. 5. 1. 7. The order of testing procedures may be varied to ensure the most effective evaluation of the traps to be tested. 5. 1. 8. Traps should not expose the operator to undue hazard under normal use. 16- 5. 1. 9. If appropriate, a broader range of measures should be checked when testing traps. Field testing should include studies of the effects of trapping on both target and non-target species. 5. 2. STUDY SITUATION 5. 2. 1. 5. 2. 2. 5. 2. 3. The trap should be set and used according to the best advice from manufacturers or others on how to do so. For compound testing, a compound should be used that provides a suitable environment for the animals of the target species to move freely, hide and show most normal behaviour. It should be possible to set traps and monitor trapped animals. The trap should be set so that video and sound recording can be made of the whole trapping episode. For field testing, sites should be selected that are representative of those that will be used in practice. Since the selectivity of the trap and any possible adverse effects of the trap on non-target species are important reasons for field testing, sites for field testing may need to be chosen in different habitats where different non-target species are likely to be encountered. Pictures of each trap and its set and of the general environment should be taken. The trap identification number should be made a part of the photographic record before and after a strike. 5. 3. STUDY PERSONNEL 5. 3. 1. Test personnel should be appropriately qualified and trained. 5. 3. 2. Among the test personnel there should be at least one person experienced in the use of the traps, and capable of trapping the animals used in the test and at least one person experienced in each of the methods of welfare assessment for restraining traps and in methods of assessing unconsciousness for killing traps. For example, the assessment of behavioral responses to trapping and of aversiveness should be done in particular by a trained person who is familiar with the interpretation of such data. 5. 4. ANIMALS TO BE USED IN TRAP TESTING 5. 4. 1. Compound test animals should be in good health and representative of those that are likely to be caught in the wild. The animals used should not have prior trapping experience of the trap being tested. 17- 5. 4. 2. Prior to the testing of traps, animals should be housed in appropriate conditions and provided with adequate food and water. Animals should not be housed in a manner that might in itself result in poor welfare. 5. 4. 3. Animals should be acclimatised to the testing compound prior to the start of the test. 5. 5. OBSERVATIONS 5. 5. 1. Behaviour 5. 5. 1. 1. Behavioral observations should be made by a trained person, particularly in reference to the knowledge of the ethology of the species. 5. 5. 1. 2. Aversiveness can be assessed by trapping the animal in a readily recognized situation, then re-exposing the animal to the trap in the appropriate situation and evaluating its behaviour. 5. 5. 1. 3. Care should be taken to distinguish responses to additional stimuli from responses to the trap or the situation. 5. 5. 2. Physiology 5. 5. 2. 1. Some animals should be fitted with telemetric recorders (e. g. , to record heart rate, respiratory rate) before testing. Such fitting should occur long enough before trapping for the animal to recover from any disturbance caused by having been fitted with such recorders. 5. 5. 2. 2. All precautions should be taken to limit inadequate or biased observations and parameters, especially those due to human interference when sampling. 5. 5. 2. 3. When biological sampling (e. g. , of blood, urine, saliva) is performed, it should be done at times relevant to the trapping event and the time-dependent considerations of the parameter being evaluated. Control data from animals kept elsewhere in good condition and for different activities, baseline data before the trapping event occurs, and some reference test with stimulations adrenocorticotrophic hormone) should also be collected. challenge extreme (e. g. , after data a 5. 5. 2. 4. All biological samples should be taken and stored according to the best knowledge to ensure conservation before analysis. 5. 5. 2. 5. Analytical methods used should be validated. 5. 5. 2. 6. For killing traps, when neurological examinations using reflexes (such as pain or eyes) are performed in combination with the measurement of an EEG and/or VERs or SERs, they should be done by an expert, to provide relevant information concerning the consciousness of the animal or the effectiveness of the killing technique. 5. 5. 2. 7. When the animals are not unconscious and insensible within the time described in the test protocol, they should be killed in a humane way. 5. 5. 3. Injuries and pathology 5. 5. 3. 1. Each test animal should be carefully examined so as to assess any injury. Radiographic examination should be conducted to confirm possible fractures. 5. 5. 3. 2. Further detailed pathological examination of dead animals should be carried out. Post mortem examination should be performed in accordance with accepted veterinary examination practices by an experienced veterinarian. 5. 5. 3. 3. The affected organs and/or regions should be examined macroscopically, and histologically if appropriate. 5. 6. REPORT 5. 6. 1. The study report should contain all relevant information about the experimental design, materials and methods, arid results, in particular : a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) j) k) 1) m) n) the technical description of the trap design including construction material; manufacturers' instructions for use; the description of the test situation; weather conditions, in particular temperature and snow depth; the test personnel; the number of animals and traps tested; the total number of captured target and non-target animals of each species, and their relative abundance expressed as rare, common or abundant in that area; selectivity; details of any evidence that the trap was activated and injured an animal that was not caught; behavioral observations; values of each physiological parameters measured and methodologies; description of injuries and post mortem examinations; time to loss of consciousness and sensibility; and statistical analyses. 19 PART IV: RESEARCH 6. RESEARCH PROGRAMMES TO IMPROVE THE SCOPE OF THE STANDARDS An appropriate range of measures of the welfare of animals that are trapped must be assessed when testing trapping systems. While such measures, in particular additional behavioral and physiological measures, have not been developed and used for a variety of species, their use in these Standards for the species under consideration will have to be verified by scientific studies carried out to determine baseline levels, ranges of response and other relevant measures. 6. 1. OBJECTIVES The research promoted and encouraged by the Parties pursuant to Article 9 must in particular be aimed at the establishment of baselines and reference data necessary to set thresholds for additional parameters, or to evaluate the relevance of other welfare measurement not included in the present scope of section 2. 3 of these Standards, including a number of behavioral and physiological indicators. 6. 2. SPECIES-SPECIFIC RESEARCH PROGRAMMES To improve scientific knowledge in the field of evaluation of the welfare of trapped animals, each Party shall promote further research for the species listed in the following table and to be completed within the defined timeframe following the entry into force of the Agreement. Species Party responsible Time-frame Ondatra zibethicus Procyon lotor Martes zibellina European Community Canada Russia 3 years 3 years 3 years - 2 0- 6. 3. PARTICULAR MEASUREMENTS TO BE STUDIED 6. 3. 1. The parameters to be studied must, in particular, include: a) b) behavioral responses after trapping, including vocalizations, extreme panic, delay before return to normal behaviour after release from trap and aversiveness. In aversiveness testing, the extent of avoidance or resistance to close approach to the previously experienced trapping situation must be evaluated; and physiological parameters, including heart rate and arrhythmia, and biochemical parameters (blood, urine or saliva measures) as appropriate for the species, including glucocorticoid concentrations, prolactin concentrations, creatine kinase activity, lactate dehydrogenase (and possibly iso-enzyme 5) and Beta Endorphin levels (if assays exists); 6. 3. 2. 6. 3. 3. The magnitude of response of the physiological parameters will refer to basal and extreme levels and time dependency. Basal level means the quantity, concentration or rate for that physiological variable when the animal is not disturbed by the environmental conditions. For physiological variables that change over periods of a few seconds or minutes, this basal level should refer to a particular activity, for example lying, standing, walking or running and jumping. Extreme level means close to the maximum or minimum level for such animals. The physiological responses referred to above are likely to be shown by all mammals, but exact basal and extreme levels and the pattern of change between these must be determined for each species tested. 6. 3. 4. The aspects of measures of physiological responses that indicate poor welfare are whether the measured level is far from the normal level and whether the duration of that altered level is significant. 6. 4. MONITORING OF THE RESEARCH PROGRAMMES The Committee shall monitor and coordinate the research promoted and encouraged by the Parties pursuant to Article 9. -21 - ANNEX II 1. 2. 3. Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community, the European Coal and Steel Community and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the Russian Federation, of the other part, done at Brussels on the 17. 07. 1995, entered into force on 1. 2. 96. Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Russian Federation, of the other part, done at Corfu on 24. 06. 94. Agreement on Trade and Commercial Relations between the Russian Federation and Canada, entered into force on 29. 12. 92. 2 2- ANNEX III THE ARBITRATION BODY Section I The complaining Party shall notify the Committee that it wishes to refer the dispute to arbitration pursuant to Article 15 of the Agreement. The notification must include the subject matter of arbitration and, in particular, the provisions of the Agreement the interpretation or application of which are at issue. 1. 2. Section 2 The Arbitration Body shall comprise three members. In disputes between two Parties, each of the disputing Parties shall appoint an arbitrator. In disputes between more than two Parties, Parties with the same interest shall appoint one arbitrator jointly by agreement. In either case, the two arbitrators so appointed shall appoint by common agreement a third arbitrator as President of the Arbitration Body. 3. The President of the Arbitration Body must not: a) b) c) be a national of the disputing Parties to the dispute; be affiliated wiuYthe disputing Parties; or have dealt with the dispute in any other capacity. 4. Any vacancy on the Arbitration Body must be filled in the manner prescribed for an initial appointment. Section 3 If, within 60 days of the appointment of the arbitrators by the Parties, the President of the Arbitration Body has not been appointed, any Party may request the President of the International Court of Justice to appoint it. - 2 3- Section 4 1. The Arbitration Body shall make its ruling strictly in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement, international law, and standard terms of reference as follows: "To determine, in the light of the facts and the relevant provisions of the Agreement (specify here the relevant provisions), whether a Party is in compliance with its obligations under the Agreement, and to issue a ruling to that effect. " 2. The Arbitration Body must satisfy itself that the claim is well-founded in fact and law. Section 5 1. 2. Unless the Parties to the dispute otherwise agree, the Arbitration Body shall determine its own rules of procedure. The rules of procedure of the Arbitration Body must in any event be in accordance with this Annex, the scope of the Arbitration Body's authority to issue rulings and the principles of procedural fairness in international law and practice. Section 6 The disputing Parties shall facilitate the work of the Arbitration Body and, in particular, using all means at their disposal, shall: a) b) provide it with all relevant documents, information and facilities, subject only to domestic legal and administrative requirements; and enable it, when necessary, to call witnesses or exports and receive their evidence. Section 7 The Parties and the arbitrators shall protect the confidentiality of any information they receive in confidence during the arbitration proceedings. Section 8 The disputing Parties shall bear the costs of the arbitration proceedings, including the arbitrators' honoraria and costs of travel, translation and secretarial services, and other related costs, in equal shares. 24- Section 9 The Arbitration Body may hear and determine counterclaims arising directly out of the subject matter of the dispute. Section 10 The Arbitration Body shall make its rulings both on the procedure and the substance of the dispute by a majority vote of the arbitrators. Votes cast shall not be disclosed. Section 11 1. 2. 1. 2. The Arbitration Body shall issue its ruling no later than 180 days after the date on which the President is appointed. The Arbitration Body may, on a unanimous vote, delay the issuance of its ruling, if the disputing Parties agree. Section 12 The determination and ruling of the Arbitration Body must be accompanied by a written statement setting out the findings and reasons on which they are based. implementation of the A dispute concerning the interpretation or manner of determination and ruling of the Arbitration Body may be submitted by either disputing Party to the Arbitration Body that issued the ruling. Section 13 A determination and ruling of the Arbitration Body is final, binding on the disputing Parties, and may not be appealed. - 2 5- ANNEX IV: DECLARATIONS OF THE PARTIES -26- DECLARATION BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION CONCERNING ARTICLE 10 PARAGRAPH 1 ALINEA D The Russian Federation hereby confirms that the derogations that may be granted under article 10 paragraph 1 alinéa d of the Agreement will concern exclusively the use of traditional wooden traps for the trapping of Martes zibelina and Mustela erminea by trappers belonging to indigenous communities located in Siberia, the Extreme North and the Far East territories. The Russian Federation also confirms that animals trapped with such trapping methods represent a maximum of 1. 4 percent (for Martes zibelina) and 3. 5 percent (for Mustela erminea) of the total number of animals of these species trapped in the Russian Federation. - 2 7- JOINT DECLARATION BY THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION CONCERNING ARTICLE 4, PARAGRAPH 2, AND ARTICLE 15 The European Community and the Russian Federation agree that the provisions under article 15 of this Agreement take precedence on the corresponding provisions under the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community, the European Coal and Steel Community and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the Russian Federation, of the other part, done at Brussels on the 17. 07. 1995, entered into force on 1. 2. 96 (the"Interim Agreement") and the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Russian Federation, of the other part, done at Corfu on 24. 06. 1994 (the "PCA"). The European Community and the Russian Federation will review the situation in case any implementing measures are taken under article 27. 4 of the Interim Agreement and/or under article 101 of the PCA. - 2 8- DECLARATION BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION CONCERNING A SPECIFIC BAN ON THE USE OF CONVENTIONAL STEEL-JAWED LEGHOLD RESTRAINING TRAPS. In recognition of the objectives of the Agreement on International Humane Trapping Standards (the "Agreement"), the Russian Federation undertakes to prohibit the use of conventional steel- jawed leghold traps, the only type of leghold restraining traps currently in use within its territory, not later than 31 December 1999, provided that international financial assistance is available to cover a sufficient part of the economic cost of the replacement of these traps. If this financial assistance were not available, the Russian Federation undertakes to prohibit the use of conventional steel-jawed leghold restraining traps within four years after the entry into force of the Agreement. -29 BY THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA DECLARATION CONCERNING AN ACCELERATED PHASE-OUT PERIOD FOR CONVENTIONAL STEEL-JAWED LEGHOLD RESTRAINING TRAPS In recognition of the objectives of the Agreement on International Humane Trapping Standards ("the Agreement") and pursuant to article 7 of the Agreement, Canada declares that: 1. The use of all jaw-type leghold restraining traps will be prohibited in Canada for the following species at the date of entry into force of the Agreement: Martes americana Mustela erminea Castor canadensis Ondatra zibethicus Martes pennanti Taxidea taxus Lutra canadensis 2. (a) Based on the results of testing already available, the use of conventional steel- jawed leghold restraining traps shall be prohibited for the remaining Canadian species listed in Annex 1 to the Agreement, as follows* Canis latrans Felis rufus Procyon lotor Canis lupus Lynx canadensis (b) This prohibition shall enter into effect by the later of: i) the end of the full field-testing season commencing in October 1999; or ii) the end of the period necessary for testing and implementation, as defined in subparagraph (c). (c) The "period necessary for testing and implementation" referred to in clause 2(b) (ii) is two full field-testing seasons plus one year after the end of the second field-testing season, commencing after the Final Conclusion of the Agreement by the Council of the European Union. (d) For Canada, a field-testing season (reffered to in clause 2(b)(i) and subparagraph 2c)) runs from October 1 to March 31. - 3 0- In view of subparagraph 2(b), this declaration shall have effect in the period between the Final Conclusion of the Agreement by the Council of the European Union and the entry into force of the Agreement as long as the Agreement (including, for greater certainty, the annexed Declarations) is applied in accordance with its terms by the European Community. - 3 1- DECLARATION BY THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY The European Community understands that the signature of the Agreement on International Humane Trapping Standards is an important and substantial step forward in ensuring a sufficient level of welfare for trapped animals. The EC therefore confirms that it will not take any measure implementing EC Council Regulation 3254/91 during the time reasonably needed for the other Parties to ratify the Agreement and, after ratification, as long as the Agreement remains in force and is applied according to its provisions. 32- ISSN 0254-1475 COM(97) 251 final DOCUMENTS EN 02 03 14 Catalogue number : CB-C0-97-264-EN-C ISBN 92-78-20791-8 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg


title: REGOLAMENTO (CE) N. 963/97 DELLA COMMISSIONE del 29 maggio 1997 che fissa le restituzioni applicabili all'esportazione dei cereali e delle farine, delle semole e dei semolini di frumento o di segala

eurovoc_concepts:
cereal flour
cereals
export refund
groat
meal


title: Avis du Comité économique et social sur le thème «Politique sociale et performance économique»

eurovoc_concepts:
economic and social cohesion
economic growth
institutional cooperation
social policy
social security

formats: html pdfa1b print


title: Regulamentul (CE) nr. 956/97 al Comisiei din 29 mai 1997 de stabilire a normelor de aplicare a Regulamentului (CE) nr. 2201/96 al Consiliului cu privire la măsurile specifice aplicabile sparanghelului prelucrat

eurovoc_concepts:
agro-industry
perennial vegetable
production aid
vegetable product

formats: pdf print xhtml

text: 166 RO Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene 03/vol. 21 31997R0956 30. 5. 1997 JURNALUL OFICIAL AL COMUNITĂȚILOR EUROPENE L 139/10 REGULAMENTUL (CE) NR. 956/97 AL COMISIEI din 29 mai 1997 de stabilire a normelor de aplicare a Regulamentului (CE) nr. 2201/96 al Consiliului cu privire la măsurile specifice aplicabile sparanghelului prelucrat COMISIA COMUNITĂȚILOR EUROPENE, având în vedere Tratatul de instituire a Comunității Europene, având în vedere Regulamentul (CE) nr. 2201/96 al Consiliului din 28 octombrie 1996 privind organizarea comună a pieței în sectorul produselor prelucrate pe bază de fructe ș(cid:13)i legume (1), în special articolul 10 alineatul (4), întrucât articolul 10 din Regulamentul (CE) nr. 2201/96 prevede măsuri specifice de promovare a produselor importante la nivel local sau regional care se confruntă cu o puternică concurență internațională; întrucât sparanghelul alb destinat prelucrării înde- plineș(cid:13)te aceste criterii; întrucât, în plus, în cazul sparanghelului destinat prelucrării, articolul 10 alineatul (3) prevede acordarea unui ajutor forfetar la hectar pentru facilitarea introducerii măsu- rilor specifice; întrucât, prin urmare, trebuie stabilite normele de aplicare a acestor dispoziții; întrucât, din rațiuni de eficiență, ar trebui puse în aplicare măsuri de îmbunătățire a competitivității sectorului prin intermediul unor programe care vor fi propuse ș(cid:13)i puse în aplicare de asociații reprezentative constând din organizații ale producătorilor ș(cid:13)i aso- ciații ale prelucrătorilor, iar condițiile privind reprezentativitatea acestora ar trebui definite ținându-se cont atât de regiunea de producție, cât ș(cid:13)i de producția comunitară; întrucât, având în vedere cerințele acestui sector, ar trebui fixate două rate diferite de finanțare comunitară, în conformitate cu tipul de măsuri care urmează a fi finanțate, precum ș(cid:13)i două pla- în funcție de gradul de foane ale finanțării comunitare, reprezentativitate al asociațiilor; în scopul facilitării calculului plafonului de către asociațiile reprezentative, ar trebui să se stabilească faptul că respectivul plafon se calculează prin raportare la valoarea producției asociațiilor reprezentative în peri- oada de trei ani 1994-1996; întrucât, întrucât, în vederea unei bune gestionări, ar trebui definite informațiile ș(cid:13)i obligațiile care vor fi incluse în programele de (1) JO L 297, 21. 11. 1996, p. 29. măsuri specifice, măsurile care vor fi excluse, limita de timp pen- tru aprobarea de către statele membre, precum ș(cid:13)i procedura de modificare a programelor; întrucât ar trebui prevăzută o singură plată în avans sub rezerva garanțiilor corespunzătoare, precum ș(cid:13)i plăți la ș(cid:13)ase luni limitate la 85 % din totalul contribuției financiare; întrucât ar trebui să se specifice faptul că garanția va fi eliberată atunci când se va plăti soldul contribuției financiare; întrucât activitățile asociațiilor ar trebui monitorizate prin intermediul unor rapoarte periodice; întrucât, având în vedere gradul înalt de responsabilitate cu care sunt învestite asociațiile reprezentative, ar trebui prevăzute proceduri stricte de control ș(cid:13)i penalități preventive pentru even- tualitatea încălcării dispozițiilor legale; întrucât, pentru a asigura direcționarea ajutorului forfetar la hectar spre zonele care se confruntă în prezent cu o puternică concu- rență internațională, acest ajutor ar trebui limitat la zonele care se specializează în producția de sparanghel alb destinat prelucrării, plantat cel târziu în 1996, care au recoltă minimă ș(cid:13)i care au înche- iat contract cu un prelucrător; întrucât, deoarece ajutorul este acordat pe o perioadă de trei ani, ar trebui să se prevadă depunerea unei singure cereri de acordare a acestui ajutor care să fie confirmat pentru anii următori printr-o declarație privind recolta; întrucât, pentru îndeplinirea condiției de limitare a ajutorului la o suprafață de 9 000 ha, ar trebui să se prevadă informarea Comisiei cu privire la suprafețele pentru care s-a solicitat ajutor, precum ș(cid:13)i stabilirea unui coeficient de redu- cere în cazul în care această suprafață maximă este depăș(cid:13)ită; întrucât, pentru ca ajutorul forfetar să fie eficient, ar trebui prevă- zute proceduri de control care să-i cuprindă ș(cid:13)i pe prelucrători ș(cid:13)i să prevadă penalități preventive în cazul încălcării dispozițiilor legale; întrucât Comitetul de gestionare a produselor prelucrate din fructe ș(cid:13)i legume nu a emis un aviz în termenul limită stabilit de preș(cid:13)edintele său, 03/vol. 21 RO Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene 167 ADOPTĂ PREZENTUL REGULAMENT: Articolul 3 CAPITOLUL I Programe de măsuri specifice Articolul 1 În sensul prezentului regulament: (a) „asociație reprezentativă” reprezintă orice asociație, cu orice statut, care: — reuneș(cid:13)te, pe de o parte, organizații ale producătorilor în sensul articolelor 11 ș(cid:13)i 13 din Regulamentul (CE) nr. 2200/96 al Consiliului (1)ș(cid:13)i/sau asociații de organizații ale producătorilor în sensul articolului 16 alineatul (3) din regulamentul menționat ș(cid:13)i/sau grupuri de producători cu recunoaș(cid:13)tere preliminară în conformitate cu articolul 14 din regulamentul menționat ș(cid:13)i, pe de altă parte, asociații de prelucrători recunoscute de statele membre; — acoperă cel puțin o treime din producția de sparanghel alb destinat prelucrării ș(cid:13)i prelucrat, din orice regiune produ- cătoare ș(cid:13)i cel puțin 15 % din producția comunitară; (b) „programe de măsuri specifice” reprezintă programe cu o durată de patru până la ș(cid:13)ase ani care vor fi prezentate până la 30 iunie 1998 de asociațiile reprezentative în contextul măsu- rilor specifice prevăzute la articolul 10 alineatul (1) din Regu- lamentul (CE) nr. 2201/96; (c) „valoarea producției comercializate” reprezintă valoarea medie anuală a sparanghelului alb livrat pentru prelucrare pe parcursul anilor 1994, 1995 ș(cid:13)i 1996 de către producătorii care aparțin organizațiilor de producători dintr-o asociație reprezentativă. Articolul 2 Programele de măsuri specifice puse în aplicare în conformitate cu Regulamentul (CE) nr. 2201/96 ș(cid:13)i prezentul regulament sunt finanțate de Comunitate până la nivelul de 60 % din cheltuielile efective aferente programului de măsuri prezentat în articolul 10 alineatul (CE) (b) ș(cid:13)i nr. 2201/96 ș(cid:13)i de 40 % pentru măsurile stabilite la literele (c) ș(cid:13)i (e) din articolul menționat. (d) din Regulamentul literele (a), (1) Finanțarea totală pentru întreaga perioadă de aplicare a programului nu poate să depăș(cid:13)ească 25 % din valoarea producției comercializate. Acest procent este mărit la 35 % în cazul unei asociații reprezentative care acoperă peste 50 % din producția comunitară. (1) JO L 297, 21. 11. 1996, p. 1. (1) Programul de măsuri specifice se referă, în mod deosebit, la una sau mai multe dintre acțiunile prezentate la articolul 10 ali- neatul (1) al doilea paragraf din Regulamentul (CE) nr. 2201/96. Programul trebuie să conțină elementele necesare pentru a asigura o îmbunătățire a competitivității produsului până la sfârș(cid:13)itul apli- cării lui. (2) Programul de măsuri specifice trebuie să conțină cel puțin următoarele informații: (a) numele ș(cid:13)i adresa organizațiilor care s-au asociat pentru a pune în aplicare programul; dovada reprezentativității asociației conform articolului 1 litera (a) ș(cid:13)i obligația de a anunța orice schimbare de natură să afecteze această reprezentativitate; cel mai recent raport de activitate al organizațiilor implicate ș(cid:13)i, dacă este cazul, statutul ș(cid:13)i/sau regulamentul intern al asociației; desemnarea unei persoane care să răspundă de prezentarea ș(cid:13)i punerea în aplicare a programului; (b) durata; (c) descrierea situației inițiale, în special producția, transformarea ș(cid:13)i utilajele; în ceea ce priveș(cid:13)te (d) obiectivele programului, ținându-se cont de perspectivele pro- ducției ș(cid:13)i ale pieței de desfacere; referiri la cantitățile cuprinse în program; (e) acțiunile care urmează să fie întreprinse ș(cid:13)i mijloacele care urmează să fie utilizate pentru atingerea obiectivelor; (f) aspecte financiare: valoarea producției comercializate ș(cid:13)i nivelul estimat al contribuției financiare comunitare; un buget ș(cid:13)i un program pentru executarea acțiunilor. (3) Programul de măsuri nu se poate referi la: (a) cheltuielile administrative ș(cid:13)i de exploatare, cu excepția cazului în care acestea sunt legate de punerea în aplicare a programu- lui; (b) materiile prime produse în afara spațiului comunitar sau produsele finite care nu sunt produse de membrii asociației reprezentative; (c) suplimentări ale veniturilor sau prețurilor; (d) acțiuni care ar putea duce la denaturarea concurenței în alte activități comerciale întreprinse de organizații care aparțin asociației reprezentative; acțiunile sau măsurile care aduc, în mod direct sau indirect, beneficii altor activități comerciale întreprinse de aceste organizații trebuie finanțate proporțio- nal cu gradul utilizării lor în sectorul sparanghelului. 168 RO Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene 03/vol. 21 (4) Programul de măsuri specifice este admisibil numai în cazul în care este însoțit de: modificări ale programului, în conformitate cu alineatul (2) dacă abaterea este mai mare de 5 % din cheltuielile previzibile pentru program. (a) un angajament scris al asociației reprezentative de a respecta Regulamentul (CE) nr. 2201/96 ș(cid:13)i prezentul regulament ș(cid:13)i de a nu primi, direct sau indirect, alte fonduri comunitare sau naționale pentru măsurile ș(cid:13)i/sau acțiunile care se califică pen- tru finanțare comunitară în conformitate cu prezentul regu- lament; (b) dovada deschiderii unui cont bancar la o instituție din statul membru în care asociația reprezentativă îș(cid:13)i are sediul, cont care urmează a fi utilizat exclusiv pentru tranzacțiile legate de punerea în aplicare a programului de măsuri specifice. Articolul 4 (1) Autoritatea națională competentă trebuie să ia o decizie pri- vind programul de măsuri specifice prezentat în termen de trei luni de la data la care le-a fost înaintat dosarul complet. (2) Asociațiile reprezentative pot solicita schimbări în programele de măsuri specifice în fiecare an cu cel mult două luni înainte de împlinirea datei de aprobare a acestora. Modificarea poate include prelungirea duratei programului cu un an. Solicitările de modificări sunt însoțite de toate documentele jus- tificative. Pentru fiecare cerere de modificare a programului, autoritatea competentă ia o decizie, în termen de două luni, în privința soli- citărilor de modificări ale programelor după analizarea documen- telor justificative furnizate ș(cid:13)i luând în considerare criteriile din articolul 4 alineatul (2). Articolul 6 (2) Autoritatea națională competentă trebuie să verifice: (a) prin toate mijloacele adecvate, inclusiv inspecții inopinate, corectitudinea informațiilor furnizate în conformitate cu articolul 3 alineatul (2) literele (a), (c) ș(cid:13)i (f); (1) De la data aprobării unui program de măsuri specifice, asoci- ațiile reprezentative pot înainta o singură cerere de plată în avans. Avansul nu poate depăș(cid:13)i 30 % din nivelul estimat al contribuției financiare comunitare. (b) conformitatea obiectivelor programelor cu articolul 10 aline- atul (1) din Regulamentul (CE) nr. 2201/96; Plata avansului se face sub rezerva depunerii unei garanții echiva- lente cu 110 % din avans. (c) consecvența economică ș(cid:13)i calitatea tehnică a programelor, temeinicia cifrelor estimative ș(cid:13)i a planului de finanțare, precum ș(cid:13)i planificarea punerii lor în aplicare. (3) Autoritatea națională competentă, după caz: (a) aprobă programele care îndeplinesc condițiile articolului 10 din Regulamentul (CE) nr. 2201/96 ș(cid:13)i pe cele din prezentul capitol; (b) solicită operarea unor modificări în programe; numai programele care vor cuprinde modificările solicitate vor fi aprobate; (c) respinge programele. (2) Garanția trebuie depusă în conformitate cu condițiile stabilite de Regulamentul (CEE) nr. 2220/85 al Comisiei (1). Garanția se eliberează în momentul plății soldului prevăzut la articolul 7 ali- neatul (2). Cerința principală, în sensul articolului 20 din Regulamentul (CEE) nr. 2220/85, cuprinde executarea operațiilor stabilite în programul de măsuri specifice sub rezerva angajamentelor stabi- lite în articolul 3 alineatul (4) litera (a) din prezentul regulament. În cazul neîndeplinirii cerinței principale sau al nerespectării grave a obligațiilor prevăzute la articolul 3 alineatul (4) litera (a), garanția se reține fără ca acest lucru să afecteze alte penalități care vor fi aplicate în conformitate cu articolul 25 din Regulamentul (CE) nr. 2201/96. Autoritatea națională competentă informează asociațiile repre- zentative în cauză asupra deciziei sale. Ea trebuie să trimită Comisiei un rezumat al programelor aprobate. Articolul 7 Articolul 5 (1) Cheltuielile stabilite în programul de măsuri specifice aprobat pot fi depăș(cid:13)ite cu până la 20 % pentru fiecare acțiune, cu condiția ca nivelul total al cheltuielilor să nu fie depăș(cid:13)it; punerea în aplicare a programului poate continua cu condiția înaintării unei cereri de (1) Contribuția financiară comunitară la program constă din plăți semestriale plus un sold. Plățile semestriale se fac pe baza cererii însoțite de documentele justificative ale cheltuielilor efective ș(cid:13)i unui raport intermediar asupra progreselor realizate în punerea în aplicare a programului. Aceste plăți nu pot depăș(cid:13)i 85 % din nivelul estimat al contribuției (1) JO L 205, 3. 8. 1985, p. 5. 03/vol. 21 RO Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene 169 financiare comunitare la program, ținând cont de plafoanele la care se face referire în articolul 2. Prima cerere pentru o plată la ș(cid:13)ase luni trebuie înaintată după ș(cid:13)ase luni de la aprobarea progra- mului. (2) Cererea de plată a soldului trebuie înaintată autorității națio- nale competente cel târziu până la sfârș(cid:13)itul celei de a patra luni după data încheierii programului de măsuri specifice. Ea trebuie însoțită de documente justificative care să arate: (a) cheltuielile efective cu programul ș(cid:13)i dovada că asociația ș(cid:13)i-a achitat contribuția proprie, precum ș(cid:13)i proveniența acesteia; (b) realizările programului sub forma unui raport final însoțit de o evaluare întocmită, dacă este cazul, cu sprijinul unui birou de consultanță specializat. Aceste evaluări trebuie să confirme atingerea obiectivelor urmărite prin programe ș(cid:13)i, dacă este cazul, să propună noi măsuri sau abordări. (3) Autoritatea națională competentă efectuează plățile prevăzute la alineatele (1) ș(cid:13)i (2) în termen de 30 de zile de la primirea cererii la care se referă al doilea paragraf din alineatul (1) sau a cererii de plată a soldului prevăzut la alineatul (2). Totuș(cid:13)i, autoritatea com- petentă poate amâna plata dacă sunt necesare verificări suplimentare. Articolul 8 (1) Statele membre efectuează controale ale organizațiilor care aparțin asociațiilor reprezentative pentru a stabili dacă acestea se conformează condițiilor de acordare a contribuției financiare comunitare. (2) Controalele vizează un procent semnificativ din cererile de plată din fiecare an. Procentul trebuie să reprezinte cel puțin 10 % din asociațiile reprezentative ș(cid:13)i 30 % din totalul asistenței comu- nitare. Dacă controalele evidențiază nereguli semnificative într-o regiune sau parte a unei regiuni, autoritățile competente trebuie să efec- tueze controale suplimentare pe parcursul anului în cauză ș(cid:13)i să mărească procentul de cereri care urmează a fi verificate în anul următor în acea regiune sau parte a regiunii. (3) Asociațiile reprezentative care fac obiectul verificărilor sunt stabilite de către autoritatea competentă, în principal pe baza unei analize a riscului care va ține cont de: (a) nivelul contribuției financiare comunitare; (b) evoluția programelor în raport cu anul precedent; (c) constatările controalelor din anii precedenți; Articolul 9 (1) Beneficiarul rambursează dublul sumei pe care a primit-o în mod nejustificat, plus dobânda calculată pe baza perioadei care s-a scurs între plată ș(cid:13)i rambursarea de către beneficiar, dacă controalele efectuate în conformitate cu articolul 8 arată că: (a) cheltuielile efective sunt mai mici decât suma indicată în cererea de plată a soldului; (b) contribuția asociației reprezentative nu a fost achitată; (c) programul de măsuri specifice a fost pus în aplicare într-un mod care nu este în conformitate cu condițiile de aprobare a acestuia de către statul membru în cauză, fără a se aduce atin- gere articolului 5. Rata dobânzii este aplicată de Institutul Monetar European la tran- zacțiile în ECU publicate în seria C a Jurnalului Oficial al Comuni- tăților Europene în vigoare la data la care s-a făcut plata nejustificată, plus trei procente. (2) În cazul în care diferența dintre contribuția financiară comu- nitară efectiv achitată ș(cid:13)i cea datorată este mai mare de 20 % din contribuția datorată, beneficiarul este solicitat să ramburseze toată contribuția plătită, plus dobânda prevăzută la alineatul (1). (3) Sumele recuperate, inclusiv dobânzile acumulate, sunt vărsate la agenția de plată responsabilă ș(cid:13)i sunt scăzute din cheltuielile finanțate de Fondul European de Orientare ș(cid:13)i Garantare Agricolă. (4) În cazul unei declarații false făcute în mod voit sau ca urmare a unei grave neglijențe, asociația reprezentativă în cauză îș(cid:13)i va pierde dreptul de a primi contribuția financiară comunitară. (5) Alineatele (1)-(4) se aplică fără a aduce atingere altor penali- tăți care sunt adoptate în conformitate cu articolul 25 din Regu- lamentul (CE) nr. 2201/96. CAPITOLUL II Ajutorul forfetar Articolul 10 Ajutorul forfetar prevăzut la articolul 10 alineatul (3) din Regula- mentul (CE) nr. 2201/96 se acordă pe parcursul anilor 1997, 1998 ș(cid:13)i 1999 pentru toate suprafețele însămânțate cu sparanghel alb destinat prelucrării sub formă de produse care intră în categoria codului CN ex 2005 60 00, dacă: (a) au fost plantate nu mai târziu de 1996 sau, în cazul plantați- ilor noi, dacă înlocuiesc plantații care au existat pe aceeaș(cid:13)i exploatație în ultimii trei ani; (b) au o producție de cel puțin 2 500 kg/ha, cu excepția celor (d) alți parametri care vor fi stabiliți de statele membre. plantate de mai puțin de un an; 170 RO Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene 03/vol. 21 (c) fac obiectul unui contract de livrare cu un prelucrător, care cuprinde o cantitate cel puțin egală cu cantitatea prevăzută la litera (d) ș(cid:13)i acoperă perioada de trei ani menționată anterior ș(cid:13)i care prevede obligația prelucrătorului de a se supune controa- lelor necesare aplicării ajutorului forfetar; (d) cel puțin 90 % din cantitatea de sparanghel alb produsă este livrată prelucrătorului ș(cid:13)i este prelucrată. Articolul 11 (1) Producătorul depune la autoritatea competentă desemnată de statul membru pentru teritoriul în care sunt amplasate zonele res- pective o singură cerere de ajutor forfetar care să acopere întreaga perioadă de trei ani, până cel târziu la 31 iulie 1997. Cererea cuprinde cel puțin următoarele indicații: (a) suprafețele cuprinse în cererea de ajutor forfetar, cu referințe cadastrale; (b) cantitățile recoltate în 1997; (c) dovada îndeplinirii condițiilor prevăzute la articolul 10. (2) Pentru 1998 ș(cid:13)i 1999, informațiile prevăzute în al doilea para- graf al alineatului (1) trebuie actualizate prin intermediul unei declarații de recoltă care este depusă până cel târziu la 31 iulie. Articolul 12 îi este Comisiei statele membre suprafața pentru care s-a solicitat ajutor forfetar până cel târziu la 15 septembrie 1997. comunicată de către Comisia trebuie să informeze statele membre asupra suprafeței totale cuprinse în cererile de ajutor pe întreg teritoriul comunitar ș(cid:13)i, dacă suprafața totală la care se face referire în articolul 10 alineatul (3) din Regulamentul (CE) nr. 2201/96 este depăș(cid:13)ită, se stabileș(cid:13)te coeficientul de reducere la suprafețele pentru care se va acorda ajutor în cazul fiecărei cereri astfel încât suprafața totală eligibilă pentru ajutor să fie menținută la nivelul maxim menționat anterior. Pentru 1997, statele membre trebuie să plătească ajutorul în termen de o lună de la data la care le sunt transmise aceste informații sau, după caz, de la data publicării în Jurnalul Oficial al Comunităților Europene a coeficientului prevăzut la al doilea paragraf. Plățile pentru 1998 ș(cid:13)i 1999 trebuie efectuate înainte de 30 septembrie. Articolul 13 Controlul efectuat de statul membru se realizează pe un eș(cid:13)antion reprezentativ din cererile de ajutor sau, după caz, din declarațiile de recoltă prezentate, stabilit prin luarea în considerare a suprafeței medii a exploatațiilor, a suprafețelor cu sparanghel alb destinat prelucrării ș(cid:13)i a distribuției geografice a acestor suprafețe. Procentul trebuie să reprezinte cel puțin 10 % din cererile de ajutor sau, dacă este cazul, din declarațiile de recoltă, ș(cid:13)i 30 % din totalul ajutorului forfetar. Aceste procente sunt mărite la 15 % ș(cid:13)i, respectiv, 40 % din anul în curs dacă se constată un număr semnificativ de nereguli. În cazul în care o cerere de ajutor sau, după caz, o declarație de recoltă a fost selectată pentru verificare, această verificare trebuie să cuprindă nu numai un control amănunțit al documentelor, ci ș(cid:13)i o verificare a exploatației, inclusiv, dacă este necesar, o măsurare a suprafețelor în cauză ș(cid:13)i o verificare a amplasamentului prelucrătorului, în special a evidențelor cu privire la stocuri. Dacă exploatațiile au ș(cid:13)i suprafețe pe care se cultivă sparanghel destinat comercializării în stare proaspătă, statele membre trebuie să ia măsurile necesare pentru a asigura conformitatea cu articolul 10 litera (d). Articolul 14 (1) Beneficiarul este solicitat să ramburseze dublul sumei plătite suplimentar, plus dobânda calculată pe baza perioadei care s-a scurs între plată ș(cid:13)i rambursarea de către beneficiar, în cazul în care controalele efectuate în conformitate cu articolul 13 evidențiază faptul că cererea sau, după caz, declarația de recoltă ș(cid:13)i documentele justificative însoțitoare sunt frauduloase. Producăto- rul ș(cid:13)i prelucrătorul în cauză nu mai au dreptul să primească finan- țare comunitară conform articolului 10 din Regulamentul (CE) nr. 2201/96. Rata dobânzii este cea aplicată de Institutul Monetar European la tranzacțiile în ECU publicate în seria C din Jurnalul Oficial al Comu- nităților Europene în vigoare la data la care se efectuează plata supli- mentară, plus trei procente. (2) Atunci când diferența dintre ajutorul forfetar plătit efectiv ș(cid:13)i ajutorul datorat este mai mare de 20 % din ajutorul datorat, bene- ficiarul este solicitat să ramburseze întregul ajutor plătit, plus dobânda prevăzută la alineatul (1). 03/vol. 21 RO Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene 171 (3) Sumele recuperate, inclusiv dobânda acumulată, sunt vărsate la agenția de plată responsabilă ș(cid:13)i sunt scăzute din cheltuielile finanțate de Fondul European de Orientare ș(cid:13)i Garantare Agricolă. (4) Alineatele (1), (2) ș(cid:13)i (3) se aplică fără a se aduce atingere altor penalități care trebuie adoptate în conformitate cu articolul 25 din Regulamentul (CE) nr. 2201/96. CAPITOLUL III Dispoziții finale Articolul 15 Prezentul regulament intră în vigoare în a ș(cid:13)aptea zi de la data publicării în Jurnalul Oficial al Comunităților Europene. Prezentul regulament este obligatoriu în toate elementele sale ș(cid:13)i se aplică direct în toate statele membre. Adoptat la Bruxelles, 29 mai 1997. Pentru Comisie Franz FISCHLER Membru al Comisiei


title: A Bizottság 956/97/EK rendelete (1997. május 29.) a feldolgozott spárgára vonatkozó egyedi intézkedések tekintetében a 2201/96/EK tanácsi rendelet részletes alkalmazási szabályainak megállapításáról

formats: html pdf print

text: 03/21. kötet HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja 89 31997R0956 L 139/10 AZ EURÓPAI KÖZÖSSÉGEK HIVATALOS LAPJA 1997. 5. 30. A BIZOTTSÁG 956/97/EK RENDELETE (1997. május 29. ) a feldolgozott spárgára vonatkozó egyedi intézkedések tekintetében a 2201/96/EK tanácsi rendelet részletes alkalmazási szabályainak megállapításáról AZ EURÓPAI KÖZÖSSÉGEK BIZOTTSÁGA, tekintettel az Európai Közösséget létrehozó szerződésre, mivel rendelkezni kell egy egyszeri előlegfizetésről, amelyre megfelelő biztosítékok vonatkoznak, valamint hathavonkénti kifizetésekről, amelyek a pénzügyi hozzájárulás 85 %-ára korlá- tozódnak; mivel meg kell határozni, hogy a biztosíték akkor oldható fel, amikor a pénzügyi hozzájárulás hátralékát kifi- zették; mivel a társulások tevékenységét időszakonkénti jelen- tések útján kell felügyelni; tekintettel a feldolgozottgyümölcs- és -zöldség-piac közös szer- vezéséről szóló, 1996. október 28-i 2201/96/EK tanácsi rende- letre (1) és különösen annak 10. cikkének (4) bekezdésére, mivel a 2201/96/EK rendelet 10. cikke konkrét intézkedéseket ír elő olyan helyi vagy regionális jelentőségű termékek támoga- tására, amelyeknek erős külföldi versenytársai vannak; mivel a feldolgozásra szánt fehér spárga megfelel ezeknek a szempon- toknak; mivel ezen túlmenően a feldolgozási célú spárga esetében a 10. cikk (3) bekezdése hektáronkénti átalánytámo- gatás nyújtását írja elő a konkrét intézkedések bevezetésének elősegítésére; mivel ennek megfelelően a fenti rendelkezések alkalmazására részletes szabályokat kell meghatározni; mivel a hatékonyság érdekében intézkedéseket kell megvalósí- tani az ágazat versenyképességének javítására olyan programok segítségével, amelyeket a termelői szervezetekből és a feldol- gozók társulásaiból álló reprezentatív szervezetek javasolnak és hajtanak végre, továbbá ezek reprezentatív jellegének feltételeit mind a termelői régióra, mind a közösségi termelésre való hivatkozással kell meghatározni; mivel az ágazat követelményeinek figyelembevételével két finanszírozási kulcsot kell meghatározni a eltérő közösségi finanszírozandó intézkedések típusának megfelelően, ugyanígy a közösségi finanszírozásra két felső határt attól függően, hogy mennyire reprezentatívak a társulások; mivel a felső határ reprezentatív társulások általi kiszámításának elősegítése érde- írni, úgy, hogy a felső határt a reprezentatív kében elő kell társulásoknak az 1994–1996 közötti hároméves időszak alatti termelési értékére való hivatkozással kell kiszámítani; mivel az ésszerű irányítás érdekében meg kell határozni a konkrét intézkedések programjába bevonandó információkat és vállalkozásokat, a kizárandó intézkedéseket, a tagállamok általi jóváhagyás határidejét, valamint a programok esetleges módosí- tásának eljárását; (1) HL L 297. , 1996. 11. 21. , 29. o. mivel a reprezentatív társulásokra háruló nagyfokú felelősségre való tekintettel szigorú ellenőrzési eljárásokról és visszatartó jellegű szankciókról kell gondoskodni a rendelkezések megsér- tése esetére; mivel annak biztosítására, hogy a hektáronkénti átalányt azokra a területekre irányítsák, amelyek jelenleg erős nemzetközi versenynek vannak kitéve, ezt a támogatást azokra a területekre kell korlátozni, amelyeket a legkésőbb 1996-ban elvetett feldol- gozási célú fehér spárga termesztésére hasznosítanak, elérnek egy minimális hozamot és egy feldolgozóval kötött szerződés vonatkozik rájuk; mivel, miután a támogatást három évre adják, egyszeri támoga- tási kérelem benyújtásáról kell rendelkezni, amelyet a következő évekre terménynyilatkozattal kell megerősíteni; mivel a támo- gatás 9 000 hektáros területre való korlátozásának betartása érdekében rendelkezni kell a Bizottság tájékoztatásáról azokat a területeket illetően, amelyekkel kapcsolatban támogatást kértek, valamint egy redukciós együttható meghatározásáról arra az esetre, ha ezt a maximális területet túllépnék; mivel a hatékony átalánytámogatás érdekében rendelkezni kell olyan ellenőrzési eljárásokról, amelyek kiterjednek a feldolgo- zókra, és visszatartó jellegű szankciókat tartalmaznak a szerző- dések megsértése esetére; mivel a Feldolgozottgyümölcs- és Feldolgozottzöldség-piaci Irányítóbizottság az elnöke által kitűzött határidőn belül nem nyilvánított véleményt, 90 HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja 03/21. kötet ELFOGADTA EZT A RENDELETET: 3. cikk I. FEJEZET A konkrét intézkedések programjai (1) A konkrét intézkedések programjai vonatkoznak külö- nösen a 2201/96/EK rendelet 10. cikke (1) bekezdésének második albekezdésében felsorolt egy vagy több intézkedésre. A programok tartalmazzák azokat a szükséges elemeket, amelyek biztosítják a termék versenyképességének javulását, alkalma- zásuk befejeződéséig. 1. cikk Ennek a rendeletnek az alkalmazásában: a) „reprezentatív társulás”: bármilyen státusú társulás, amely: – tömöríti egyrészről a termelői szervezeteket, amint azokat a 2200/96/EK tanácsi rendelet (1) 11. és 13. cikke megha- illetve a termelői szervezetek társulásait, amint tározza, rendelet 16. cikkének (3) bekezdése azt az említett meghatározza, rendelet 14. cikke szerinti előzetes elismeréssel rendelkező termelői csopor- feldolgozói tokat, másrészről a tagállam által elismert társulásokat, illetve az említett – a feldolgozásra szánt és feldolgozott fehér spárga legalább egyharmadát termeli meg bármely termelői régióban, és legalább 15 %-kal részesedik a közösségi termelésből; b) a „konkrét intézkedések programjai”: olyan programok, amelyek időtartama négy–hat év, és amelyeket a reprezen- tatív társulásoknak 1998. június 30. előtt kell benyújtaniuk a 2201/96/EK rendelet 10. cikkének (1) bekezdésében emlí- tett konkrét intézkedésekkel összefüggésben; A konkrét (2) következő információkat kell tartalmazniuk: intézkedések programjainak legalább a a) azoknak a szervezeteknek neve és címe, amelyek a program végrehajtására társultak; a társulás reprezentatív jellegének igazolása az 1. cikk a) pontja alapján, illetve kötelezettség- vállalás a reprezentatív jelleget érintő minden változással kapcsolatos tájékoztatást illetően; a tagszervezetek tevékeny- ségét ismertető legutolsó jelentés, valamint adott esetben a társulás alapszabálya vagy belső szabályzata; a program ismertetéséért és végrehajtásáért felelős személy adatai; b) időtartam; c) a kiinduló helyzet ismertetése, különösen a termés feldolgo- zását és a berendezéseket illetően; d) a program céljai, figyelembe véve a termelési és elhelyezési kilátásokat; hivatkozással a programban szereplő mennyisé- gekre; e) a megvalósítandó tevékenységek és a célok elérését szolgáló eszközök; c) az „értékesített termelés értéke”: az 1994-ben, 1995-ben és 1996-ban valamely reprezentatív társulás termelői szerveze- teihez tartozó termelők által feldolgozásra leszállított fehér spárga átlagos éves értéke. f) pénzügyi vonatkozások: az értékesített termelés értéke és a közösségi pénzügyi hozzájárulás becsült összege; költség- vetés és ütemterv az intézkedések végrehajtására. 2. cikk A 2201/96/EK rendelettel és ezzel a rendelettel összhangban bevezetett konkrét intézkedések programjait a Bizottság finan- szírozza a 2201/96/EK rendelet 10. cikke (1) bekezdésének a), b) és d) pontjaiban szereplő intézkedésekhez tartozó prog- ramok során felmerült tényleges kiadások 60 %-áig, valamint 40 %-ban az említett cikk c) és e) pontjában meghatározott intézkedésekhez tartozó programokat illetően. (3) Az intézkedési programok nem érinthetik: a) az adminisztratív vagy működési kiadásokat, kivéve azokat az eseteket, ahol ezek a program megvalósításával össze- függnek; b) a Közösségen kívül termelt nyersanyagokat vagy olyan kész- termékeket, amelyeket nem a reprezentatív társulás tagjai állítanak elő; c) a jövedelem-, illetve árkiegészítést; A teljes finanszírozás a program alkalmazásának teljes idősza- kára nem haladhatja meg az értékesített termelés 25 %-át. Ez az arány 35 %-ra emelkedik azon reprezentatív társulás esetén, amely a közösségi termelésből 50 %-ot meghaladó mértékben részesedik. (1) HL L 297. , 1996. 11. 21. , 1. o. d) az olyan tevékenységeket, amelyek a piaci verseny torzulását eredményezhetik a reprezentatív társuláshoz tartozó szerve- zetek által folytatott egyéb üzleti tevékenységben; azokat a tevékenységeket vagy intézkedéseket, amelyek közvetlenül vagy közvetve hasznára vannak az e szervezetek által folyta- tott egyéb üzleti tevékenységeknek, a spárgatermelő ágazat általi felhasználásuk arányában kell finanszírozni. 03/21. kötet HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja 91 A konkrét intézkedések programjai csak akkor fogad- (4) hatók el, ha kapcsolódik hozzájuk: a) a reprezentatív társulás írásos kötelezettségvállalása, hogy a társulás megfelel a 2201/96/EK rendeletben és az ebben a rendeletben szereplő előírásoknak, illetve sem közvetlenül, sem közvetve nem részesül többszörös közösségi vagy nemzeti finanszírozásban az e rendelet alapján közösségi finanszírozásra jogosult intézkedések, illetve tevékenységek után; (2) A reprezentatív társulások a konkrét intézkedések prog- ramjainak módosítását minden évben legkésőbb az azok jóvá- hagyásának évfordulóját megelőző két hónappal kérhetik. A változások körébe tartozhat a program időtartamának egy évvel való meghosszabbítása. A változtatási kérelmekhez valamennyi alátámasztó okmányt mellékelni kell. b) bankszámla megnyitásának igazolása abban a tagállamban működő pénzintézetnél, amelynek területén a reprezentatív társulás székhelye található; ez a bankszámla kizárólag a konkrét intézkedések programjának megvalósításával kap- csolatos tranzakciók céljára vehető igénybe. A hatáskörrel rendelkező hatóságok a programok módosítá- sával kapcsolatos döntéseiket a mellékelt alátámasztó okmá- nyok megvizsgálását követően, továbbá a 4. cikk (2) bekezdé- sében megadott szempontokat figyelembe véve két hónapon belül hozzák meg. 4. cikk 6. cikk A hatáskörrel rendelkező nemzeti hatóságok a konkrét (1) intézkedések programjairól a teljes dosszié benyújtásának időpontjától számítva három hónapon belül döntenek. (1) A reprezentatív társulások a konkrét intézkedések prog- ramja elfogadásának időpontját követően egyszeri előlegfizetési kérelmet terjeszthetnek be. (2) A hatáskörrel rendelkező nemzeti hatóságok ellenőrzik: a) minden alkalmas módon, beleértve a helyszíni ellenőrzést is, a 3. cikk (2) bekezdésének a), c) és f) pontja értelmében nyújtott információ pontosságát; b) azt, hogy a program céljai megfelelnek-e a 2201/96/EK ren- delet 10. cikke (1) bekezdésében foglaltaknak; c) a programok és műszaki minőségét, a becslések, a finanszírozási terv, valamint ezek megvalósítása megtervezésének alaposságát. közgazdasági összhangját A hatáskörrel rendelkező nemzeti hatóságok, a megfelelő (3) módon: a) jóváhagyják azokat a programokat, amelyek eleget tesznek a 2201/96/EK rendelet 10. cikkében és az ebben a fejezetben előírt követelményeknek; b) változtatásokat indítványoznak a programokban; csak a kért változtatásokat tartalmazó programok kapnak jóváhagyást; c) elutasítják a programokat. A hatáskörrel rendelkező nemzeti hatóságok döntéseikről tájé- koztatják az érintett reprezentatív társulásokat. A jóváhagyott programokról szóló összefoglaló tájékoztatást megküldik a Bizottság részére. 5. cikk A jóváhagyott programban meghatározott kiadás az (1) egyes intézkedéseket illetően legfeljebb 20 %-kal léphető túl, feltéve hogy a kiadások teljes összegét nem lépik túl; ha az eltérés meghaladja a program előrelátható kiadásainak 5 %-át, úgy a programok végrehajtása csak akkor folytatható, ha a változtatásra irányuló kérelmet a (2) bekezdésnek megfelelően nyújtják be. Az előleg nem haladhatja meg a közösségi pénzügyi hozzájá- rulás becsült összegének 30 %-át. Az előleg kifizetésének feltétele az előleg értékének 110 %-át kitevő biztosíték letétele. A biztosítékokat a Bizottság 2220/85/EK rendeletében (1) (2) meghatározott feltételeknek megfelelően kell letétbe helyezni. A biztosítékokat a 7. cikk (2) bekezdésében említett utolsó részlet kifizetésekor lehet feloldani. A 2220/85/EK rendelet 20. cikke szerint értelmezett „elsődleges követelmény” kiterjed az e rendelet 3. cikke (4) bekezdésének a) pontjában megjelölt kötelezettségvállalások alá tartozó konkrét tevékenységek teljesíté- intézkedések programjában megjelölt sére. Abban az esetben, ha az elsődleges követelményt nem teljesítik, illetve súlyos mulasztást követnek el a 3. cikk (4) bekezdésének illetően, a a) pontjában említett kötelezettségek teljesítését biztosíték a 2201/96/EK rendelet 25. cikkének megfelelően alkalmazandó egyéb szankcióktól függetlenül elvész. 7. cikk A Közösség pénzügyi hozzájárulása a programhoz hat- (1) havonkénti részletekből és egy utolsó részletből áll. A hathavonkénti részleteket a tényleges kiadásokat kimutató alátámasztó okmányokkal alátámasztott kérelem, valamint a program megvalósításának pillanatnyi állásáról készült időközi jelentés alapján teljesítik. A részletek összege nem lépheti túl a Közösség hozzájárulásának 85 %-át, figyelembe véve a 2. cikkben említett felső határokat. A hathavonkénti részletfizetésre vonatkozó első kérelmet a program jóváhagyásától számított hat hónappal kell beterjesz- teni. programhoz pénzügyi adott (1) HL L 205. , 1985. 8. 3. , 5. o. 92 HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja 03/21. kötet kifizetésére Az utolsó részlet vonatkozó kérelmet (2) legkésőbb a konkrét intézkedések programjának befejezését követő negyedik hónap végéig kell beterjeszteni a hatáskörrel rendelkező nemzeti hatósághoz. A kérelemhez alátámasztó okmányokat kell mellékelni, amelyek kimutatják: a) a programmal kapcsolatos tényleges ráfordításokat, valamint annak igazolását, hogy a társulás saját hozzájárulását befi- zették, továbbá ennek eredetét; végleges b) a program eredményeit formájában, amelyhez mellékelni kell adott esetben egy szaktanácsadó iroda közreműködésével készült értékelést. Ennek az értéke- lésnek igazolnia kell a programban kitűzött célok elérését, illetve adott esetben új intézkedéseket vagy módszereket kell felvetnie. jelentés (3) A hatáskörrel rendelkező nemzeti hatóságnak az (1) és (2) bekezdésben említett kifizetéseket az (1) bekezdés második albekezdésében említett kérelem, illetve a (2) bekezdésben emlí- tett utolsó részlet kifizetésére vonatkozó kérelem kézhezvéte- létől számított 30 napon belül kell teljesítenie. Mindazonáltal a hatáskörrel rendelkező hatóság a kifizetést elhalaszthatja abban az esetben, ha további igazolásra van szükség. 8. cikk A tagállamoknak ellenőrzéseket kell végrehajtaniuk a (1) reprezentatív hogy ellenőrizzék, azok megfelelnek-e a közösségi pénzügyi hozzájá- rulás feltételeinek. tartozó szervezeteknél, társulásokhoz (2) Az ellenőrzéseknek minden évben a fizetési kérelmek megfelelő szignifikáns mintára kell kiterjedniük. A mintának a reprezentatív társulások legalább 10 %-ára, és a teljes közösségi hozzájárulás legalább 30 %-ára kell kiterjednie. Abban az esetben, ha az ellenőrzések lényeges szabálytalansá- gokat fednek fel valamely régióban, illetve a régió valamely részében, a hatáskörrel rendelkező hatóságoknak a szóban forgó évben további ellenőrzéseket kell végezniük, a következő illetve a évben pedig növelniük kell az ebben a régióban, régiónak ebben a részében ellenőrzött kérelmek arányát. A hatáskörrel hatóságoknak rendelkező (3) elsősorban kockázatelemzés alapján kell meghatározniuk, hogy mely reprezentatív társulásokat ellenőrizzék, továbbá az elem- zésnek a következőkre kell kiterjednie: nemzeti a) a közösségi pénzügyi hozzájárulás összege; b) a programok trendje az előző évhez viszonyítva; c) az előző években lefolytatott ellenőrzések eredményei; 9. cikk A kedvezményezett köteles kifizetni a jogosulatlanul kifi- (1) zetett összeg kétszeresét, valamint a kifizetés és a kedvezménye- zett általi visszafizetés közötti időre számított kamatot abban az esetben, ha a 8. cikknek megfelelően végrehajtott ellenőr- zések azt mutatják, hogy: a) a tényleges kiadás kevesebb az utolsó részlet kifizetésére vonatkozó kérelemben feltüntetett összegnél; b) a reprezentatív társulás hozzájárulásának kifizetésére nem került sor; illetve c) a konkrét intézkedések programját olyan módon hajtották végre, ami az 5. cikk sérelme nélkül, nem felel meg az érin- tett tagállam általi jóváhagyás feltételeinek. Az alkalmazandó kamatláb az Európai Monetáris Intézet által az ECU-ben végrehajtott ügyletekre alkalmazott és az Európai Közösségek Hivatalos Lapjának C sorozatában kihirdetett, azon a napon hatályos kamat, amelyiken a jogosulatlan kifizetésre sor került, három százalékponttal megnövelve. és Abban az esetben, ha a ténylegesen kifizetett közösségi (2) közötti hozzájárulás különbség a jogosult összeg 20 %-át meghaladja, a kedvezmé- nyezett köteles visszafizetni a teljes kifizetett hozzájárulást, valamint az (1) bekezdésben megjelölt kamatokat. jogosultan járó hozzájárulás a A beszedett összegeket a felgyülemlett kamatokkal együtt (3) a hatáskörrel rendelkező kifizető ügynökség részére kell kifi- zetni, és le kell vonni az Európai Mezőgazdasági Orientációs és Garanciaalap által finanszírozott költségekből. (4) Szándékosan vagy súlyos gondatlansággal készített hamis nyilatkozat esetén az illető reprezentatív társulást ki kell zárni a közösségi pénzügyi hozzájárulási keretből. Az (1)–(4) bekezdések nem érintik a 2201/96/EK ren- (5) delet 25. cikkének megfelelően kiróható egyéb szankciókat. II. FEJEZET Átalánytámogatás 10. cikk A 2201/96/EK rendelet 10. cikkének (3) bekezdésében említett átalánytámogatást az 1997-ben, 1998-ban és 1999-ben fehér spárgával beültetett terület után nyújtják, ha a fehér spárgát az ex 2005 60 00 KN kód alá tartozó termékekké dolgozzák el, az alábbi feltételek mellett: a) a spárgát legkésőbb 1996-ban ültették, illetve új ültetvények esetén azok olyan ültetvényeket váltanak fel, amelyek ugyan- abban a gazdaságban a megelőző három évben már léteztek; b) hozamuk legalább 2 500 kg/ha, kivéve az egy évnél rövi- d) a tagállamok által meghatározandó egyéb paraméterek. debb ideje ültetett ültetvényeket; 03/21. kötet HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja 93 c) valamely feldolgozóval kötött szállítási szerződés vonatkozik rájuk, amely legalább a d) pontban említett mennyiségre és a fent említett hároméves időszakra vonatkozik, és kötele- zettségvállalást tartalmaz a feldolgozó részéről arra, hogy aláveti magát az átalánytámogatás bevezetéséhez szükséges ellenőrzéseknek; d) a megtermelt fehér spárga mennyiségének legalább 90 %-át elszállítják a feldolgozóhoz és feldolgozzák. 11. cikk A termelő legkésőbb 1997. július 31-ig egyetlen, a teljes (1) hároméves időszakra vonatkozó kérelmet nyújt be az átalány- támogatást illetően a tagállam által arra a területre kijelölt hatáskörrel rendelkező hatóságnál, amelyen a területek talál- hatók. A kérelemnek legalább a következőket kell tartalmaznia: a) az átalánytámogatási kérelemben szereplő területek, katasz- teri adatokkal; b) az 1997-ben betakarított mennyiségek; c) annak igazolása, hogy a 10. cikkben említett feltételek telje- sültek. (2) 1998-ra és 1999-re az (1) bekezdés második albekezdé- sében említett információt egy legkésőbb július 31-ig benyújtott termésnyilatkozattal kell frissíteni. 12. cikk A tagállamok legkésőbb 1997. szeptember 15-ig tájékoztatják a Bizottságot azt a területet illetően, amely után átalánytámoga- tást igényeltek. A Bizottság tájékoztatja a tagállamokat arról a teljes területről, amely után a Közösség egész területén támogatási kérelmeket nyújtottak be, illetve abban az esetben, ha a 2201/96/EK ren- delet 10. cikkének (3) bekezdésében említett maximális területet túllépték, meghatározza a redukciós együtthatót azokra a terü- letekre, amelyek után az egyes kérelmek alapján támogatást nyújt, annak érdekében, hogy a támogatásra jogosult összterü- letet a fent említett maximális szinten tartsák. 13. cikk A tagállamok ellenőrzéseket végeznek a támogatási kérelmek, illetve adott esetben a benyújtott termésnyilatkozatok jelentős mintáján, amelyet a gazdaságok átlagos területére, a feldolgo- zásra szánt spárgával beültetett területre és e területek földrajzi megoszlására való tekintettel határoznak meg. illetve adott esetben a A mintának a támogatási kérelmek, termésnyilatkozatok és a teljes átalánytámogatás legalább 10 %-át, illetve a teljes átalánytámogatás 30 %-át kell képvisel- niük. Ezeket az arányokat 15 %-ra, illetve 40 %-ra kell növelni a folyó évtől abban az esetben, ha jelentős számú szabálytalan- ságot találtak. Abban az esetben, ha támogatási kérelmet, illetve adott esetben ellenőrzésre kiválasztottak, az ellenőr- termésnyilatkozatot zésnek nemcsak részletes, dokumentumokon alapuló ellenőr- zésből kell állnia, hanem a gazdaságokon végzett ellenőrzésből is, beleértve, ahol szükséges, az érintett területek felmérését, illetve a feldolgozó üzemében végzett ellenőrzést is, különös tekintettel a készletnyilvántartásra. Abban az esetben, ha a gazdaságoknak friss termékként történő is vannak, a értékesítésre szánt spárgával beültetett területei tagállamok megteszik a szükséges lépéseket annak biztosítására, hogy betartsák a 10. cikk d) bekezdésében foglaltakat. 14. cikk a A kedvezményezett köteles (1) túlfizetés összegének kétszeresét a kifizetés és a kedvezményezett általi visszafizetés között eltelt időre számított kamatokkal együtt visszatéríteni abban az esetben, ha a 13. cikk alapján végzett ellenőrzések azt mutatják, hogy a kérelem, illetve adott esetben a termésnyilat- kozat és a kísérő alátámasztó okmányok hamisak. A termelőt és a közreműködő feldolgozót kizárják a 2201/96/EK rendelet 10. cikke szerinti közösségi finanszírozásból. Az alkalmazandó kamatláb az Európai Monetáris Intézet által az ECU-ben végrehajtott ügyletekre alkalmazott és az Európai Közösségek Hivatalos Lapjának C sorozatában kihirdetett, azon a napon hatályos kamat, amelyen a túlfizetés történt, három százalékponttal megnövelve. 1997-re a tagállamok a támogatást ennek az információnak a kihirdetésétől, illetve a második bekezdésben említett együttha- tónak az Európai Közösségek Hivatalos Lapjában való kihirdeté- sétől számított egy hónapon belül kifizetik. Az 1998-ra és 1999-re vonatkozó kifizetéseket szeptember 30. előtt kell telje- síteni. (2) Abban az esetben, ha a ténylegesen kifizetett átalány- támogatás és a jogosultan járó támogatás közötti különbség a jogosult támogatás 20 %-át meghaladja, a kedvezményezett köteles visszafizetni a teljes kifizetett támogatást, valamint az (1) bekezdésben megjelölt kamatokat. 94 HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja 03/21. kötet (3) A beszedett összegeket a felgyülemlett kamatokkal együtt a hatáskörrel rendelkező kifizető ügynökség részére kell kifi- zetni, és le kell vonni az Európai Mezőgazdasági Orientációs és Garanciaalap által finanszírozott költségekből. Az (1), (2) és (3) bekezdés nem érinti a 2201/96/EK ren- (4) delet 25. cikkének megfelelően kiróható egyéb szankciókat. III. FEJEZET Záró rendelkezések 15. cikk Ez a rendelet az Európai Közösségek Hivatalos Lapjában való kihir- detését követő hetedik napon lép hatályba. Ez a rendelet teljes egészében kötelező és közvetlenül alkalmazandó valamennyi tagállamban. Kelt Brüsszelben, 1997. május 29-én. a Bizottság részéről Franz FISCHLER a Bizottság tagja


title: ETA:n sekakomitean päätös N:o 36/97, tehty 29 päivänä toukokuuta 1997, ETA-sopimuksen liitteen XX (Ympäristö) muuttamisesta

eurovoc_concepts:
European Economic Area
air quality
environmental standard
exchange of information
industrial pollution
pollution control
pollution control measures


title: Parere del Comitato economico e sociale sul tema «Servizi d'interesse generale in Europa»

eurovoc_concepts:
EU market
economic and social cohesion
productivity
public service
services contract


title: Beslutning om I. Rådets retsakt af 26. juli 1995 om udarbejdelse af konventionen om brug af informationsteknologi på toldområdet, om konventionen udarbejdet på grundlag af artikel K.3 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Union om brug af informationsteknologi på toldområdet og om aftalen om midlertidig anvendelse mellem visse medlemsstater af konventionen udarbejdet på grundlag af artikel K.3 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Union om brug af informationsteknologi på toldområdet (C4-0248/95 og C4- 0520/95) og II. Rådets retsakt af 29. november 1996 om en protokol udarbejdet på grundlag af artikel K.3 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Union, om præjudiciel fortolkning ved De Europæiske Fællesskabers Domstol af konventionen om brug af informationsteknologi på toldområdet og dertil hørende erklæringer

eurovoc_concepts:
European convention
computer applications
customs
data processing
information system
information technology
personal data
protection of privacy

formats: html print


title: KOMISSION ASETUS (EY) N:o 957/97, annettu 29 päivänä toukokuuta 1997, tuonnin kiinteistä arvoista tiettyjen hedelmien ja vihannesten tulohinnan määrittämiseksi

eurovoc_concepts:
citrus fruit
fruit vegetable
import price
stone fruit


title: Resolution on the Commission's recommendation for the broad guidelines of the economic policies of the Member States and the Community for 1997 (COM(97)0168 C4-0190/97)

eurovoc_concepts:
EU Member State
European Community
economic growth
economic policy
employment policy
exchange rate
labour market
price stability
public finance