title: Amended proposal for a Council Directive on the quality of water indended for human consumption

eurovoc_concepts:
drinking water
public health
water analysis
water pollution
water supply

text: COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 04. 06. 1997 COM(97) 228 final 95/0010 (SYN) Amended Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on the Quality of Water Intended for Human Consumption (presented by the Commission pursuant to Article 189 a (2) of the EC-Treaty) EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM Pursuant to Article 189 (a) paragraph^ of the EC Treaty, the Commission submits an amended Proposal for a Council Directive on the quality of water intended for human consumption. The amended proposal takes account of a number of amendments adopted by the European Parliament at its December 1996 Plenary Session. In general the Commission cannot accept the amendments which are. in its opinion, unworkable, or which will make implementation unduly onerous. On the other hand the Commission can accept amendments which improve the clarity of the text and which remove any possible areas of ambiguity or doubt. The Commission can also accept those amendments which improve still further the transparency of proposed Directive. Therefore, the Commission can accept amendments 1. 3. 4. 5. 16. 18. 20. 25. 28 to 33, 36. 38. 40. 42, 48 to 50, and 64 without reservation. These all improve the text, either by including sensible and logical additional requirements, or by removing possible areas of misinterpretation, or by improving transparency and the level of protection provided. In addition the Commission can accept in principle Amendments 6. 10. 17. 19. 26. 39. 44. 45. 47, 58, 65, and 77. The Commission also accepts the thrust of amendment 121 under certain conditions as noted below. Commentary on the above amendments accepted in principle follows:- Amendment 6 concerns the scientific basis of the Proposal. This serves a useful purpose but the exact wording needs to be modified to include the Commission's Scientific Committee to examine the Toxicity and Ecotoxicity of Chemical Compounds. Amendment 10 concerns Endocrine Disruptors. There is indeed rising concern about such substances but the text needs to be modified to ensure it encapsulates the full essence of the issues. Amendments 17, 26 and 47 deal with the proposed exemption for not meeting the standards at the tap. The Commission agrees that there is a need to restrict the current exemption to the lead parameter and to domestic householders only. However such an important derogation, should not be relegated to Note 3 of Annex I Part B, but should instead be mentioned in the body of the Articles. Therefore, the Commission cannot agree that Articles 2(2) and 7(3) are deleted, but rather amended to reflect the spirit of this change. With respect to amendment 47. the Commission cannot accept the second part of the amendment which obliges Member States to report to the Commission on the incidence of lead piping in households, and to come forward with a plan to replace it. This obligation is inconsistent with the first part of the amendment. Amendment 19 concerns Endocrine Disruptors and other harmful substances. The Commission does not think it is necessary to mention specifically endocrine disruptors since these are inferred and already included in the term "other substances harmful to health". Therefore the wording needs to be modified Amendment 39 concerns the time limit for Article 18 special circumstances. This could cause some difficulties in some Member States, and the Commission would prefer a commitment for a review after two years and the opportunity for a possible extension of two years. Amendment 44 refers to new scientific evidence and the Commission agrees that new scientific evidence must be assessed to ensure that our standards are fully in compliance with current scientific thinking. However in view of the 1997 World Health Organisation (WHO) review of their Guideline Values this note should refer to all the following parameters:- Trichlorethene: Nickel; Nitrate and Nitrite; Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): and Trihalomethanes (THMs) in respect of Chloroform. Amendment 45 refers to note 2 in Annex I, Part B on the Trihalomethane (THM) parameter. This is acceptable providing the interim standard is adjusted to 150 micrograms per litre (f. ig/1) after 5 years, in accordance with the comments on amendment 121 below. Amendment 58 calls for monitoring of the lead parameter to be harmonised, and this seems a sensible proposition. Tlie exact wording of this amendment needs to be adjusted to ensure consistency with other provisions of the Proposal. Amendment 65 refers to protection measures for surface and groundwater resources. Tlie Commission can accept this in principle since the context is fully consistent with what the Commission has included in the proposed Framework Directive. Amendment 77 concerns disinfection, and the obligation to ensure that drinking water is not contaminated with disinfection by-products. This amendment can be accepted in principle since it is consistent with the need to find a balance between efficient disinfection and the contamination of drinking water from disinfection by-products. Amendment 121 introduces a total standard for four named Trihalomethanes (THMs) of 80 ug/1 at the tap, in place of the Commission's proposal of two individual standards at the treatment works. Tlie Commission originally expressed an acceptance in principle for amendment 41, but the latter fell in the plenary voting in favour of amendment 121. Therefore, the Commission accepts the thrust of amendment 121 providing that the parametric value for all four THMs is changed to 100 micrograms per litre (ug/1) - instead of 80 ug/1 - to be met after 10 years, with an interim standard of 150 micrograms per litre (u. g/1) after 5 years. This would bring measurement of the THM parameter into line with many Member State current practices. Tlie Commission can accept Amendment 7 in part. Tlie Commission can accept the first part of this amendment in full, as it is right that the measures taken should be co-ordinated with the Pesticides marketing Directive. However the second parfrof the amendment referring to the ECJ mling cannot be accepted since it is not necessary or warranted. Tlie Commission cannot accept the remaining amendments, namely 2. 8, 9. 11, 12. 14, 15, 21 to 24, 27, 34, 35, 37, 43, 46, 51, 52, 53, 61, 73, 87, 91. 92. 118, and 119. Commentary on these amendments follows :- Amendment 2 refers to the "modus vivendi" between Parliament. Council, and the Commission. This is an unnecessary reference and adds nothing of substance to the Proposal. Hence it is not acceptable. Amendments 8 and 9 call for the "guaranteed protection" of catchments from Pesticides and Nitrates respectively. Such protection cannot, even with the best will in the world be "guaranteed", and such an amendment would be virtually impossible to implement fully. Amendment 11 calls for the parametric values to be complied with in all cases at the tap. There are several parameters which do not change their value between the treatment works and the tap. and where this can be established, it is fair to offer Member States the opportunity to measure such parameters at the treatment works. Amendments 12 and 34 deal with the regulation of materials in contact with water. Tlie Commission accepts that the question of piping materials is highly relevant to the eventual quality of drinking water at the tap, but this is primarily a matter for Directive 89/106/EEC - the Construction Products Directive. Amendment 14 calls for the Commission to update Parliament on the implementation of the Directive. This amendment stems from the mistaken impression that the costs of meeting the standards, and in particular the lead standard, are to be borne by the Community. These costs are to be met by Member States and not the Community, and therefore the Commission is unable to support this amendment. Amendment 15 requires that failures to meet the standards "must" be investigated, rather than "should" be investigated. This is not acceptable since there may be cases where taking remedial action is not feasible, and the supply must be closed. This is not really remedial action. Therefore, "should" is preferable. Amendment 21 calls for Member States inform the Commission of guidelines drawn up to deal with the implications of an interruption in the supply ôr a restriction in use. This is not acceptable since there would be no benefit to be gained if the Commission was to be infomied of the mass of guidelines that may be produced by Member States. Amendments 22 to 24 delete the notification procedure which is to be applied when Member States choose to introduce more stringent standards, or standards for additional parameters- Tlie Commission cannot accept these amendments since the notification procedure is intended to ensure that other standards are not used in a manner which could constitute a barrier to trade, and hence prejudice the functioning of the internal market. Amendment 27 calls for the Commission to be informed of Member States monitoring programmes. This is not acceptable since there would be no benefit to be gained if the Commission was to be informed about all the monitoring programmes that may be produced by Member States. Amendment 35 proposes the deletion of the words "so far as this is relevant to the protection of human health" from Article 12. Tlie effects of the this deletion would mean that parameters which are not relevant to human health could not be altered in the future, as this would be seen as a "deterioration". This could, ironically, lead to a reduction in the quality of the water, and therefore it cannot be accepted. Amendment 37 proposes the deletion of all comitology procedures. Tlie Commission took great care in adopting the proposal to ensure that any changes to Annex I - the parameters and parametric values- must be through the full legislative procedure involving Parliament. However, in the case of Annex II (monitoring) and Annex III (measurement methods), any updating should be by Committee. The Commission considers this to be the most efficient way to deal with what are essentially technical issues. There will, of course, be a full application of the Plumb - Delors procedure. Amendments 43 and 51 relate to Endocrine Disruptors. Tlie Commission is very aware that this is an area of rising concermjind therefore accepts the call for a study to be carried out to determine the need for such a parameter. However, the Commission believes it is premature to insert a new parameter for such substances at this stage, and therefore cannot accept these amendments. Amendment 46 calls for the lead standard of 10 micrograms per litre (mg/1). to be met within 10 years after entry into force of the Directive. Tlie Commission cannot accept such a timetable. Tlie proposed figure is 15 years, and this is based on what the Commission believes to be the best balance between the protection of human health, and the economic consequences of achieving such a standard. Amendment 52 calls for copper to be included in Annex I Part C i. e. : as an indicator parameter. Tlie Commission's Scientific Committee has recommended that a parametric value of 2 mg/1 should be set in order to provide freedom from acute gastrointestinal disturbances, and furthermore the WHO will be reviewing their guideline value for copper in 1997. In view of this, it is considered that it would be premature to move the parameter to Annex 1 part C or change or delete the parametric value. Amendment 53 calls for the parameters Tetrachlorethene and Trichlorethene to be replaced by one parameter for 5 specified organochlorine compounds with a parametric value of 10 mg/1. Tetrachlorethene and Trichlorethene were chosen by the Commission as appropriate parameters for the presence of chlorinated solvents, and the parametric values were fixed at 40 and 70 mg/1 respectively, as advised by the Commission's Scientific Committee and in accordance with the World Health Organisation (WHO) Guidelines. Tlie Commission feels that it would be inappropriate to impose anything other than the toxicologically based WHO standards on all Member States. However the Commission has asked its scientific Committee for a view on this amendment, and when the WHO comes up with its re-evaluation of the guideline value for Trichlorethene, the Commission will examine the results and may propose a revised standard, if appropriate and necessary. Amendments 61 and 92 introduce radioactivity standards into the proposed Directive. Tlie Commission cannot accept these amendments, since radioactivity in drinking water is already covered under the Euratom Treaty and Council Directive 96/29/Euratom (Basic Safety Standards for the health protection for the protection of the health of workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionising radiation). Amendment 73 provides an exemption from the Directive for water in closed industrial systems. This amendment cannot be accepted since closed industrial systems are already excluded via Article 2(1) (b) of the proposal. Amendments 87 and 91, propose the addition of Coliforms to Annex I Part A and Annex II Table Al. Tlie Commission cannot accept these amendments, but it will examine the need for this and other microbiological parameters in both these annexes. Amendments 118 and 119 deal the obligation to maintain a supply to domestic consumers at all times, without prejudice to the costs of the supply. Tlie Commission cannot accept such amendments because they impinge on the subsidiarity principle, and hence the issue is one for Member States to deal with. 1 OJ No L 159, 29. 6. 96, p 1 Amended Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on the Quality of Water Intended for Human Consumption Commission Proposal Amended Proposal Recital 2 Whereas in keeping with the provision of Article 3(b) of the Treaty, whereby any action by the Community should not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objectives of the Treaty, it is necessary to revise the provisions of Directive 80/778/EEC so as to focus on compliance with health parameters, leaving Member States free to add secondary parameters if they see fit; essential quality and Whereas in keeping with the provision of Article 3(b) of the Treaty, whereby any action by the Community should not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objectives of the Treaty, it is necessary to revise the provisions of Directive 80/778/EEC so as to focus on compliance with health parameters, leaving Member States free to add other parameters if they see fit; essential quality and Recital 2a (new) in compliance with the Whereas, subsidiarity principle. Community action must support and supplement action by the the Member competent authorities States; in r Recital Whereas, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, the differences in natural and socio-economic features of the regions in the Union require that most decisions on monitoring, analysis, and on the measures to be taken to redress failures be taken at a local, regional or national level; Whereas, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, the differences in natural and socio-economic features of the regions in the Union require that most decisions on monitoring, analysis, and on the measures to be taken to redress failures be taken at a local, regional or national level; in so far as the differences do not detract from the establishment of the framework of laws, regulations and administrative provisions laid down by this Directive; Recital 4 standards in order to define Whereas Community for essential health-related quality parameters in water intended for human consumption are necessary the minimum environmental quality goals to be achieved in connection with other Community measures, to safeguard the sustainable use of water intended for human consumption; in order standards Whereas Community for essential and preventive health-related quality parameters in water intended for human consumption are necessary in order to define the minimum goals for a high level of environmental protection to be in connection with other achieved Community measures, to safeguard and promote the sustainable use of water intended for human consumption; in order Recital 4a (new) Whereas the standards in Annex I are generally based on the World Health Organisation's Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality, and the advice of the to Commission's Scientific Committee examine the toxicity and Ecotoxicitv of Chemical Compounds. Recitals 6a and 6b (new) Whereas to enable the quality standards for drinking water to be met by the water supply undertakings, appropriate water protection measures should be applied to ensure that surface and groundwater is kept clean; Whereas the coherence of European water policy presupposes a suitable water framework directive will be adopted in due course Recital 8 for and Whereas measures are required to meet specified values for all directly health- relevant parameters other parameters if a deterioration in quality has such occurred; whereas measures should be carefully coordinated with implementation of Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market by as Commission Directive 94/79/EC. furthermore amended last the for and Whereas measures are required to meet specified values for all directly health- relevant parameters other parameters if a deterioration in quality has such occurred; whereas measures the implementation of Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market as last amended by Commission Directive 94/79/EC. should not prejudice furthermore } Recital 1 la (new) to base Whereas there is no conclusive evidence precautionary on which parameters, yet there is increasing concern about the potential impact on humans and the effects of substances wildlife of include to harmful environmental disaipting chemicals; health, which endocrine Article 1(2) 2. The objective of the Directive is to protect - human health from the adverse effects resulting from the contamination of water intended for human consumption by ensuring that it is wholesome. 2. The objective of the Directive is to protect human health from the adverse effects resulting from the contamination of water intended for human consumption by ensuring that it is wholesome and clean. Article 2(2) Z For the purpose of this Directive, "domestic distribution system" shall mean all pipe work and fittings which connect a consumer's tap to the supply and which, according to the relevant national law, are not the responsibility of the water supplier. 2. For the purpose of this Directive, "domestic distribution system" shall mean all pipe work and fittings which connect a household or group of households to the the supply and which, according relevant national the responsibility of the water supplier. to law, are not Article 3(d) (d) (d) for intended without prejudice to Article 5(1), human water consumption from an individual source less households, unless the water is offered for sale. 15 or serving for intended without prejudice to Article 5(1), water human consumption from an individual fewer serving 15 or supply households, unless the water is offered for sale. S> Article 4(1) (b) (b) free of pathogenic micro in a is organisms and numbers which potential danger to human health. parasites constitute (b) is free of pathogenic micro organisms and parasitesa or other in substances harmful to health, numbers or concentrations which constitute a potential danger to human health. Article 4(2) 2. Member States shall take all other measures necessary to ensure that water intended for human consumption meets the objective set out in Article 1. 2. Member States shall take all other measures necessary, to ensure that water intended for human consumption meets the objective set out in Article 1. This shall include catchment protection measures that take full account of the precautionary principle and the polluter pavs principle. Article 7(2) 2. For water intended for human consumption supplied from a distribution network, the parametric values shall be complied with as it emerges from at least one tap in the consumer's premises. 2. For water intended for human consumption supplied from a distribution network, the parametric values shall be complied with as it emerges from all cold water taps, which are representative for human consumption. Article 7(3) 3. Member States are deemed to have fulfilled their obligations under this Article and under Articles 4 and 9(2) where it can be established that non-compliance with the parametric values set in accordance with Article 6(1), (2) and (3) is due to the domestic distribution system. 3. Member States are deemed to have fulfilled their obligations under this Article and under Articles 4 and 9(2) where it can be established that non-compliance with the parametric value for lead set in accordance with Article 6(1), (2) and (3) is due to the domestic distribution system. Article 8(1) Member States shall 1. take all to ensure regular, measures necessary representative monitoring of the quality of water intended for human consumption, in order to check whether the water available to consumers meets the requirements of this Directive. In addition, Member States shall take all measures necessary to ensure that, where disinfection forms part of the preparation of water intended for human consumption, the disinfection treatment applied is verified. the efficiency of Member States shall I. take all to ensure regular, measures necessary representative monitoring of the quality of water intended for human consumption, in order to check whether the water available to consumers meets the requirements of this Directive. In addition, Member States shall take all measures necessary to ensure that, where disinfection forms part of the preparation of water intended for human consumption, the disinfection treatment applied is verified is no unnecessary and contamination by products. the efficiency disinfection there from that of Article 8(3) The sampling points shall be 3. determined by the competent authorities. 3. The sampling points shall be determined by the competent authorities,, without prejudice to Article 7(2). Article 8(6) The Commission shall review at reference every least methods of analysis specified in Annex III. three years the 6. The Commission shall review at regular intervals the reference methods of analysis specified in Annex III. Wo Article 9(2) 2. If, despite the measures taken to meet the obligations under Article 4(1), water intended for human consumption does not meet the requirements of Annex I, Member States shall ensure that the necessary remedial action is taken as soon as possible to restore its quality. 2. If, despite the measures taken to meet the obligations under Article 4(1), water intended for human consumption does not meet the requirements of Annex I, Member States shall ensure that the necessary remedial action is taken as soon as possible to restore its quality, and that consumers are notified. Article 9(3a) (new) 3a. Member States shall prioritise their enforcement action, having regard to the extent to which the relevant parameter has been exceeded. Article 10(1) from Member States may make 1. provision the for derogations parametric values set out in Annex I part B up to a maximum value to be determined by them, provided that the derogation does not constitute a potential danger to human health and provided that the supply of water intended for human consumption in the area concerned cannot otherwise be maintained by any other reasonable means. Derogations should not exceed two years after which a review must be forwarded conducted the Commission determine whether sufficient progress has been made. The Commission may, on the basis of the review, permit a further derogation up to two vears. and to to from Member States may make 1. provision the for derogations parametric values set out in Annex I part B for a limited period of time and up to a maximum value to be determined by them, provided that the derogation during such period does not constitute a potential danger to human health and provided that the supply of water intended for human consumption in the area concerned cannot otherwise be maintained by any other reasonable means. < " 1l Article 10(2) (d) (d) an appropriate monitoring scheme, with an increased monitoring frequency where necessary; (d) an appropriate monitoring scheme, with an increased monitoring frequency where necessary and relevant, and earlier monitoring results where avai I able; Article 14(1) At \0 years, least every 1. the Commission shall review Annex I in the light of scientific and technical progress and shall make proposals for amendments, where necessary, under the procedure in Article 189c of the Treaty. 1. At least every five years, the Commission shall review Annex I in the light of scientific and technical progress and shall make proposals for amendments, where necessary, under the procedure in Article 189c of the Treaty. Article 16(4) 4. The formats and the minimum information for the reports referred to in paragraphs shall be determined having special regard to the measures referred to in Articles 3(d), 5, 6(3) and 9, and shall if necessary, be amended in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 15. The formats and the minimum 4. information for the reports referred to in paragraph 3 shall be determined having special regard to the measures referred to in Articles 3(d), 5, 6(3). 8(2), 9, 10(5 and 6} and 18(1), and shall if necessary, be amended in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 15. 4Z Article 18(1) Member States may in exceptional 1. circumstances and for geographically defined population groups submit a special request to the Commission for a longer period than provided for in this Directive for complying with individual parametric values set in Part B of Annex I. This provision does not apply to water intended for human consumption offered for sale in bottles or containers. Member States may in exceptional 1. circumstances and for geographically defined population groups submit a special request to the Commission for a longer period than provided for in this Directive, for complying with individual parametric values set in Part B of Annex I. The period should not exceed two years after which a review must be conducted and forwarded to the Commission which may, on the basis of the review, permit a further period of up to two years, providing the total period does not exceed five years. This provision does not apply to water intended for human consumption offered for sale in bottles or containers. Annex I, Part B, entry 5 Boron 300 j. ig/1 Boron 1. 0 mg/1 (= 1000iig/l) Annex I, Part B, entries 7 and 9 Bromodichloromethane Chloroform 15 ug/1 40 ug/1 (Note 2) Total Trihalomethanes (THM) 100 ug/1 2 chloroform - Bromoform - Dibromochloromethane 2 Bromodichloromethane (Notes 1 and 2) 13 Annex 1, Part B, entry 21a (new), (after "pesticides") Total pesticides 0. 5 ug/1 (TSfote 5a) Annex I, Part B, Note 1 Applies to:- Boron Copper Nickel Nitrate Nitrite Polycvclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Trichlorethene Trihalomethanes Chloroform) (in respect of Applies to:- Boron Copper Note 1 : The values and classification of Note 1 : The values and classification of these be parameters may amended in the light of new scientific evidence which is expected to become available shortly. these be parameters may amended in the light of new scientific evidence which is expected to become available shortly. IV, Annex I, Part B, Note 2 to be Note 2: The samples for these parameters are taken after any chlorine contact time and at the outlet of the water treatment the plant. Where necessary, for parametric bromodichloromethane can be increased to 25 ug/1 provided that the parametric value for chloroform is reduced to 30 f. ig/1. value into force Note 2: The samples for these parameters are to be taken at the tap and must be met at the latest 10 calender years from the date of entry this Directive. When implementing the measures to achieve this value. Member States shall give priority to those areas where THM concentrations in water intended human for; consumption are high- of to reduce Member States shall ensure that all appropriate measures are the taken concentration of THMs in water human for intended consumption as as much the period possible during needed to achieve compliance with the parametric value. The parametric value for total THMs from 5 years after the entry into force of this directive until 10 years after it has entered into force is 150 ug/1 to be met at the tap. Member States must produce a it to the report and forward Commission, accordance in with. Article 16(5). on areas with high THM values and come forward within 5 years with a plan to reduce THMs to 100 ug/1. 1S Annex I, Part B, Note 3, paragraph 3 a (new) Where water sampled at a tap within a household does not comply with the parametric value, and in accordance with Articles 2(2) and 7(3), Member States need not oblige individual householders to replace or permit the replacement of those lead pipes or components containing lead, where the non-compliance is due to the domestic distribution system. Annex I, Part B, Note 3, paragraph 3b (new) The sampling and monitoring methods in a shall be carried out and defined harmonized fashion. Annex I, Part B, Note 5(a) (a) Pesticides means ; (a) Pesticides means : - organic insecticides, - organic herbicides, - organic fungicides, - organic nematocides, - organic acaricides, - organic algicides, related and regulators]. products [growth - organic insecticides, - organic herbicides, - organic fungicides, - organic nematocides, - organic acaricides, - organic algicides, [growth related and regulators and metabolites with an effect similar to pesticides!. products ic Annex I, Part B, Note 5a (new) New note to new line in table (Total pesticides) Note 5a: (a) Pesticides means : - organic insecticides; - organic herbicides; - organic fungicides; - organic nematocides; - organic acaricides; - organic algicides; related, products and are and regulators ["growth metabolites which pesticides! pesticides Only which are to be present in a given supply need to be monitored. likely those (M Annex I, Part B, Note 5(d) (d) The Commission shall examine whether an individual value can be set for a given substance, after an evaluation of the available scientific information. Deleted. ^ ISSN 0254-1475 COM(97) 228 final DOCUMENTS EN 14 05 Catalogue number : CB-CO-97-218-EN-C ISBN 92-78-19723-8 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg 1*


title: 97/380/EG: Entscheidung der Kommission vom 4. Juni 1997 zur Ermächtigung der Mitgliedstaaten, den Anforderungen der Richtlinie 66/401/EWG des Rates nicht entsprechendes Saatgut von Zwiebellieschgras (Phleum bertolonii DC.) vorübergehend zum Verkehr zuzulassen

eurovoc_concepts:
Sweden
derogation from EU law
fodder plant
marketing
marketing standard
seed

formats: html pdfa1b print


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1945/97 by Esko SEPPÄNEN to the Commission. BSE in The Netherlands

eurovoc_concepts:
EU Member State
Netherlands
animal disease
cattle
epidemic
exchange of information
public health
veterinary legislation

formats: html pdf print

text: 11. 3. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 76/65 The main elements of the control programme are: › coordinated deployment of control resources (aerial surveillance, patrol vessels) by the Member States concerned › Greece, Spain, France and Italy, › exchange of national fisheries inspectors which will be deployed on patrol vessels provided by different Member States, › extensive sea patrols and port inspection, › zero tolerance on non-compliance with Community rules, › close monitoring of national control programmes by the Commission(cid:146)s fisheries inspectorate. The adoption of a common control programme which envisages close co-operation and co-ordination between Member States and facilitates the exchange and deployment of national inspectors marks a new departure for the monitoring of this fishery. The programme has been agreed in order to overcome control deficiencies noted in the past and to ensure that the fishery is conducted in full compliance with Community rules. For its part, the Commission will closely monitor the implementation of the control programmes by Member States throughout the season and to that end will deploy its inspectors in ports and on board patrol vessels provided by Member States. In this regard, the Commission and the Member States have agreed on a zero tolerance policy with respect to any incidence of non-compliance by Community fishermen during the 1997 season. Fishermen engaging in the driftnet fishery will now have the possibility of receiving cessation premiums provided by the Italian national conversion plan. Joining the conversion plan is voluntary, therefore those fisherman wishing to continue driftnetting may do so, provided that Community legislation is respected. (98/C 76/150) WRITTEN QUESTION E-1945/97 by Esko Seppa¤nen (GUE/NGL) to the Commission (4 June 1997) Subject: BSE in The Netherlands According to reports in the Finnish press, the first case of BSE in the Netherlands occurred a few weeks ago. Does the Commission know whether this report is true, and if so, what does it intend to do to prevent the spread of the disease? Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission (5 August 1997) The Commission was informed by the Dutch authorities immediately after confirmation of the first and again after the second case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) on its territory, on 21 March 1997 and 7 April 1997. At the same time the authorities in other Member States were informed by way of the animal disease notification system (ADNS), in accordance with Community rules. Subsequently the Dutch veterinary authorities reported on their findings and the measures taken, to the various meetings of the standing veterinary committee. The measures taken were considered adequate by the Member States and the Commission in protecting public and animal health, against risk of exposure to the transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) agent resulting from these two outbreaks


title: ΓΡΑΠΤΗ ΕΡΩΤΗΣΗ αρ θ. 1911/97 του Amedeo AMADEO προς την Επ τροπή. 25η έκθεση για την πολιτική ανταγωνισμού

eurovoc_concepts:
EU publication
European Commission
application of EU law
competition
competition law
economic concentration
joint venture

text: C 60/66 EL Epi·shmh Efhmeri·da tvn Eyrvpai¤kv· n Koinoth·tvn 25. 2. 98 H Epitroph· e·xei epi·gnvsh tvn dyskoliv· n poy synantoy·n orisme·new fore·w oi asfalistikoi· mesa·zontew poy drasthriopoioy·ntai se diasynoriakh· ba·sh. Gia ton lo·go ayto·n apofa·sise na epilhfuei· toy ue·matow. Sthn anakoi·nvsh thw Epitroph·w (3) «Xrhmatooikonomike·w yphresi·ew: Ay·jhsh thw empistosy·nhw toy katanalvth·», h Epitroph· analamba·nei sygkekrime·na thn anasko·phsh thw odhgi·aw toy 1976 kai toy baumoy· ston opoi·o efarmo·zontai oi arxe·w thw sy·stashw toy 1991, prin ta me·sa toy 1998. H Epitroph· ua ejeta·sei an apaitoy·ntai peraite·rv me·tra, symperilambanome·nhw thw dynato·thtaw na dieyrynuei· to pedi·o efarmogh·w thw odhgi·aw o·son afora· thn pro·sbash kai thn a·skhsh toy epagge·lmatow. (1) EE L 26 thw 31. 1. 1977 (2) EE L 19 thw 28. 1. 1992 (3) Anakoi·nvsh tvn k. k. Monti kai Bonino prow thn Epitroph· «Xrhmatopistvtike·w yphresi·ew: Ay·jhsh thw empistosy·nhw toy katanalvth·» poy ekdo·uhke stiw 25 Ioyni·oy 1997, COM (97) (98/C 60/99) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-1911/97 ypobolh·: Amedeo Amadeo (NI) prow thn Epitroph· (4 Ioyni·oy 1997) Ue·ma: 25h e·kuesh gia thn politikh· antagvnismoy· Se sxe·sh me thn 25h e·kuesh gia thn politikh· antagvnismoy· (1995) (e·ggr. COM(96) 126 tel. ) kai to sxe·dio anakoi·nvshw thw Epitroph·w o·son afora· th synergasi·a metajy· thw Epitroph·w kai tvn arxv· n poy eggyv· ntai ton antagvnismo· toyw sta kra·th me·lh, gia thn eje·tash tvn periptv· sevn poy proble·pontai apo· ta a·rura 85 kai 86 thw Synuh·khw EK (1). H anauev· rhsh toy kanonismoy· 4064/89 (2) e·xei ple·on mpei se mia pio sygkekrime·nh fa·sh programmatismoy·. Diapistv· nontaw mia proti·mhsh gia thn mei·vsh tvn katvfli·vn, den apoklei·etai na ejetasuoy·n eynoi¤ka· orisme·new enallaktike·w ly·seiw poy synde·ontai me tiw «pollaple·w» eidopoih·seiw. Ekto·w apo· to pro·blhma tvn katvfli·vn, h anauev· rhsh toy kanonismoy· 4064/89 afora· tiw koine·w synetairis- tike·w epixeirh·seiw. Gia to zh·thma ayto·, zhtei·tai apo· thn Epitroph· h megaly·terh dynath· diafa·neia, prokeime·noy na apofeyxuoy·n endexo·menew abebaio·thtew h· kai sobare·w diakri·seiw, ypogrammi·zoyme de thn ana·gkh miaw kata·llhlhw ly·shw gia tiw ypo·loipew koine·w epixeirh·seiw, oi opoi·ew den ei·nai apoly·tvw synetairistike·w alla· «diarurvtike·w». (1) EE C 262 thw 10. 9. 1996, sel. 5. (2) EE L 395 thw 30. 12. 1989, sel. 1. Apa· nthsh toy k. Van Miert ej ono· matow thw Epitroph· w (23 Ioyni·oy 1997) H Epitroph· uevrei· o·ti h pro·tash kanonismoy· (EK) toy Symboyli·oy gia thn tropopoi·hsh toy kanonismoy· (EOK) ariu. 4064 /89 toy Symboyli·oy thw 21hw Ioyli·oy 1989, sxetika· me ton e·legxo tvn sygkentrv· sevn metajy· epixeirh·sevn (1) beltiv· nei oysiastika· thn antimetv· pish tvn koinv· n epixeirh·sevn. Pra·gmati, h pro·tash ayth· proble·pei o·ti o·lew oi koine·w epixeirh·seiw plh·royw leitoyrgi·aw › h·toi ekei·new poy plhroy·n se mo·nimh ba·sh o·lew tiw leitoyrgi·ew miaw ayto·nomhw oikonomikh·w onto·thtaw › poy antapokri·nontai sta o·ria thw koinotikh·w armodio·thtaw, sto ejh·w ua analy·ontai sto plai·sio kai ba·sei tvn diadikasiv· n kai prouesmiv· n toy kanonismoy· gia tiw sygkentrv· seiw. H ana·lysh ayth· ua perilamba·nei, endexome·nvw, thn ekti·mhsh toy syntonismoy· metajy· tvn epixeirh·sevn sy·mfvna me ta krith·ria toy a·ruroy 85, para· grafoi 1 kai 3 thw synuh·khw EK. Mia te·toia prose·ggish e·labe thn safh· yposth·rijh toy Koinoboyli·oy stiw 13 Noembri·oy 1996 (2) kai apete·lese antikei·meno politikh·w symfvni·aw sto plai·sio toy Symboyli·oy thw 24hw Aprili·oy 1997. Eja·lloy,proble·petai, gia na enisxyuei· h asfa·leia dikai·oy tvn epixeirh·sevn, na diasafhnisuei· to ue·ma tvn koinv· n epixeirh·sevn plh·royw leitoyrgi·aw poy den antapokri·nontai sta katv· flia thw koinotikh·w armodio·thtaw, me dh·lvsh thw Epitroph·w kai na antimetvpisuei· h dia·krish metajy· epixeirh·sevn plh·royw leitoyrgi·aw kai mh plh·royw leitoyrgi·aw me tropopoi·hsh thw anakoi·nvshw thw Epitroph·w sxetika· me th dia·krish metajy· koinv· n epixeirh·sevn me xarakth·ra sygke·ntrvshw kai koinv· n epixeirh·sevn synetairistikoy· xarakth·ra poy uespi·suhke apo· ton Kanonismo· (EOK) ariu. 4064/89 toy Symboyli·oy sxetika· me ton e·legxo tvn pra·jevn sygke·ntrvshw metajy· epixeirh·sevn (3). (1) EE C 350 thw 21. 11. 1996, COM(96) 313 teliko· (2) Bl. ch·fisma nomouetikoy· periexome·noy poy perie·xei th gnv· mh toy Eyrvpai¤koy· Koinoboyli·oy sxetika· me thn pro·tash kanonismoy· toy Symboyli·oy gia thn tropopoi·hsh toy kanonismoy· toy Symboyli·oy (EOK) ariu. 4064/89 thw 21hw Dekembri·oy 1989 gia ton e·legxo tvn sygkentrv· sevn metajy· epixeirh·sevn (EE ariu. C 362 thw 2. 12. 1996) kai ch·fisma gia ton koinotiko· e·legxo tvn pra·jevn sygke·ntrvshw: Pra·sino Bibli·o thw Epitroph·w sxetika· me thn anauev· rhsh toy Kanonismoy· gia tiw sygkentrv· seiw (EE C 362 thw 2. 12. 1996). (3) EE C 385, 31. 12. 1994


title: PERGUNTA ESCRITA n. 1945/97 do Deputado Esko SEPPÄNEN à Comissão. BSE nos Países Baixos

text: 11. 3. 98 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias C 76/65 Os principais elementos do programa de controlo sa(cid:152)o os seguintes: › Utiliza(cid:231)a(cid:152)o coordenada dos recursos de controlo (vigila(cid:136)ncia ae·rea, navios de inspec(cid:231)a(cid:152)o) pelos Estados- -membros em causa (Gre·cia, Espanha, Fran(cid:231)a e Ita·lia), › interca(cid:136)mbio entre inspectores nacionais das pescas que exercera(cid:152)o tarefas nos navios de inspec(cid:231)a(cid:152)o fornecidos pelos va·rios Estados-membros, › extensivas patrulhas no mar e inspec(cid:231)o(cid:152)es nos portos, › tolera(cid:136)ncia nula relativamente ao incumprimento das disposi(cid:231)o(cid:152)es comunita·rias, › acompanhamento estrito dos programas nacionais de controlo pelo servi(cid:231)o de inspec(cid:231)a(cid:152)o das pescas da Comissa(cid:152)o. A adop(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de um programa de controlo comum que preve(cid:136) uma estreita coopera(cid:231)a(cid:152)o e coordena(cid:231)a(cid:152)o entre os Estados membros e facilita o interca(cid:136)mbio e as tarefas dos inspectores nacionais marca um novo arranque do controlo desta pescaria. O programa foi acordado com vista a superar as deficie(cid:136)ncias de controlo verificadas no passado e assegurar o exerc(cid:14)·cio da pescaria no pleno respeito das disposi(cid:231)o(cid:152)es comunita·rias. Por sua vez, a Comissa(cid:152)o acompanha estreitamente a execu(cid:231)a(cid:152)o dos programas de controlo pelos Estados- -membros durante toda a campanha e, para este efeito, os seus inspectores exercera(cid:152)o tarefas nos portos e a bordo dos navios de patrulha fornecidos pelos Estados-membros. Neste dom(cid:14)·nio, a Comissa(cid:152)o e os Estados-membros acordaram numa pol(cid:14)·tica de tolera(cid:136)ncia nula relativamente a qualquer incumprimento por parte dos pescadores comunita·rios durante a campanha de 1997. Os pescadores que praticam a pesca com redes de deriva te(cid:136)m agora a possibilidade de beneficiar dos pre·mios por cessa(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de actividades, previstos pelo plano de conversa(cid:152)o italiano. Contudo, a adesa(cid:152)o ao plano de conversa(cid:152)o e· facultativa, pelo que os pescadores que pretendam continuar a exercer a pesca de deriva podem continuar a faze(cid:136)-lo, desde que respeitem a legisla(cid:231)a(cid:152)o comunita·ria. (98/C 76/150) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-1945/97 apresentada por Esko Seppa¤nen (GUE/NGL) a‘ Comissa(cid:152)o (4 de Junho de 1997) Objecto: BSE nos Pa(cid:14)·ses Baixos De acordo com os jornais finlandeses, foi diagnosticado nos Pa(cid:14)·ses Baixos, ha· umas semanas, o primeiro caso de uma vaca contaminada com a doen(cid:231)a da BSE. Esta· a Comissa(cid:152)o informada sobre a validade desta informa(cid:231)a(cid:152)o e, em caso afirmativo, que tenciona fazer para evitar a propaga(cid:231)a(cid:152)o da doen(cid:231)a? Resposta dada por Franz Fischler em nome da Comissa(cid:152)o (5 de Agosto de 1997) A Comissa(cid:152)o foi informada pelas autoridades neerlandesas imediatamente apo·s a confirma(cid:231)a(cid:152)o do primeiro e, de novo, do segundo casos de encefalopatia espongiforme dos bovinos (EEB) no seu territo·rio, a saber, em 21 de Mar(cid:231)o de 1997 e 7 de Abril de 1997. Paralelamente, as autoridades dos outros Estados-membros foram informadas atrave·s do sistema de notifica(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de doen(cid:231)as dos animais (SNDA), nos termos da regulamenta(cid:231)a(cid:152)o comunita·ria. Posteriormente, as autoridades veterina·rias neerlandesas apresentaram relato·rios sobre o inque·rito realizado e as medidas tomadas nas diversas reunio(cid:152)es do Comite· Veterina·rio Permanente. As medidas tomadas foram consideradas adequadas, por parte dos Estados-membros e da Comissa(cid:152)o, para a protec(cid:231)a(cid:152)o da sau·de pu·blica e animal dos riscos de exposi(cid:231)a(cid:152)o ao agente transmiss(cid:14)·vel da encefalopatia espongiforme resultante destes dois focos


title: ΓΡΑΠΤΗ ΕΡΩΤΗΣΗ αρ θ. 1946/97 του Sebastiano MUSUMECI προς την Επ τροπή. Περικοπές των πόρων ΕΕ για τον τουρισμό στην Ιταλία

eurovoc_concepts:
Community support framework
EU aid
EU regional policy
European Regional Development Fund
Sicily
operational programme
reflation
tourism
tourist infrastructure

text: 22. 1. 98 EL Epi·shmh Efhmeri·da tvn Eyrvpai¤kv· n Koinoth·tvn C 21/123 (98/C 21/236) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-1939/97 ypobolh· : Kirsten Jensen (PSE) kai John Iversen (PSE) prow thn Epitroph· (4 Ioyni·oy 1997) Ue·ma: Panv· lhw tvn xoi·rvn Stiw ollandike·w efhmeri·dew thw 12hw Mai(cid:143)oy 1997 anafe·fuhkan oi a· uliew synuh·kew diabi·vshw xoi·rvn poy e·xoyn prosblhuei· apo· panv· lh. Ta zv· a ei·xan pe·sei apo· katapakth· toy stay·loy sta peritv· mata kai pni·ghkan. H astynomi·a afai·rese th fvtografikh· mhxanh· apo· fvtogra·fo poy brisko·tan ekei·. Den pistey·ei h Epitroph· o·ti h metaxei·rish a·rrvstvn zv· vn pre·pei na ei·nai ajiopreph·w; Ei·nai diateueime·nh h Epitroph· na anala·bei thn prvtoboylia na synta·jei pra·sino bibli·o gia thn eyhmeri·a tvn zv· vn sthn (cid:201)nvsh; Proti·uetai h Epitroph· na ejeta·sei gia poioy·w lo·goyw to koino· den enhmerv· netai gia tiw proanaferuei·sew synuh·kew kai giati· den epetra·ph ston ollando· fvtogra·fo na dhmosiey·sei tiw fvtografi·ew toy; Apa· nthsh toy k. Fischler ej ono·matow thw Epitroph· w (26 Ioyni·oy 1997) H mo·nh koinotikh· nomouesi·a poy isxy·ei sh·mera, kai afora· tiw synuh·kew kalh·w diabi·vshw tvn xoi·rvn sta agrokth·mata, perilamba·netai sthn odhgi·a 91/630/EOK toy Symboyli·oy, thw 19hw Noembri·oy 1991 gia toyw stoixeiv· deiw kano·new gia thn prostasi·a tvn xoi·rvn (1). To para·rthma thw odhgi·aw ayth·w (Kefa· laio I, shmei·o 6) proble·pei o·ti o·loi oi xoi·roi poy ektre·fontai omadika· h· se atomike·w ue·seiw pre·pei na epiuevroy·ntai apo· ton ka·toxo h· ton ypey·uyno tvn zv· vn toyla·xiston mi·a fora· thn hme·ra. Ka·ue xoi·row poy fai·netai asuenh·w h· traymatisme·now pre·pei na ypoba·lletai, xvri·w kauyste·rhsh, se kata·llhlh uerapeytikh· agvgh·. Oi asuenei·w h· traymatisme·noi xoi·roi pre·pei na mporoy·n, o·tan ayto· ei·nai aparai·thto, na apomonv· nontai se kata·llhloyw xv· royw me jhra· kai a·neth strvmnh·. Ea·n oi xoi·roi den antidroy·n stiw fronti·dew toy ektrofe·a, ua pre·pei, to syntomo·tero dynato·n na zhtei·tai h gnv· mh eno·w kthnia·troy. (cid:211)son afora· tiw mellontike·w ejeli·jeiw, se sxe·sh me th kalh· diabi·vsh tvn xoi·rvn, h Epitroph· parape·mpei sto a·ruro 6 thw odhgi·aw 91/630/EOK sy·mfvna me to opoi·o h Epitroph· ypoba· llei sto Symboy·lio e·kuesh poy synta·ssetai ba·sei gnv· mhw thw episthmonikh·w kthniatrikh·w epitroph·w sxetika· me ta dia·fora systh·mata entatikh·w ektrofh·w poy throy·n tiw apaith·seiw kalh·w diabi·vshw tvn xoi·rvn. Aname·netai o·ti h episthmonikh· kthniatrikh· epitroph· ua oloklhrv· sei thn e·kuesh· thw me·xri te·low Ioyli·oy toy tre·xontow e·toyw. To zh·thma thw pro·sbashw tvn fvtogra·fvn se idivtike·w egkatasta· seiw die·petai apo· to di·kaio toy en lo·gv kra·toyw me·loyw. (1) EE L 340 thw 11. 12. 1991. (98/C 21/237) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-1946/97 ypobolh· : Sebastiano Musumeci (NI) prow thn Epitroph· (4 Ioyni·oy 1997) Ue·ma: Perikope·w tvn po·rvn EE gia ton toyrismo· sthn Itali·a Dedome·noy o·ti se pro·sfath sy·nodo poy pragmatopoih·uhke sthn proedri·a thw perife·reiaw Sikeli·aw oi ekpro·svpoi thw Genikh·w Diey·uynshw Perifereiakv· n Politikv· n thw EE apei·lhsan na meiv· soyn th xrhmatodo·- thsh gia ton sikeliko· toyrismo·, h opoi·a proble·petai sto PEP 94/99, kai na epanaprogrammati·soyn tiw koinotike·w enisxy·seiw prow a·llew kateyuy·nseiw• › lamba·nontaw ypo·ch o·ti h apeiloy·menh perikoph· ua steroy·se to nhsi· apo· 90 peri·poy dis. li·rew, mataiv· nontaw me ton tro·po ayto· thn prospa·ueia pollv· n toyristikv· n epixeirh·sevn poy edv· kai poly· kairo· e·xoyn proxvrh·sei sthn kata·rtish tvn anagkai·vn sxedi·vn v· ste na apokth·soyn pro·sbash stiw dieykoly·n- seiw thw EE gia thn eni·sxysh tvn ypodomv· n kai thn prosarmogh· stoyw kano·new asfa·leiaw• › lamba·nontaw ypo·ch o·ti to ejaggelue·n drastiko· me·tro ypagorey·etai apokleistika· apo· ypotiue·menew grafeiokratike·w kauysterh·seiw ek me·royw thw Perife·reiaw Sikeli·aw kai, kata· syne·peia, ua h·tan yperboliko· lo·gv tvn zhmiogo·nvn synepeiv· n poy ua e·xei, ea· n ylopoihuei·• Mporei· na maw plhroforh·sei h Epitroph· ea·n ei·nai alhuh· o·sa proanh·ggeilan sto Pale·rmo oi koinotikoi· ypa·llhloi kai, se katafatikh· peri·ptvsh, ea·n kri·nei o·ti ua pre·pei na yiouethuoy·n enallaktike·w ly·seiw oi opoi·ew den ua plh·ttoyn peraite·rv mia perife·reia toy «Sto·xoy 1» poy e·xei anala·bei mia e·ntonh prospa·ueia koinvnikooikonomikh·w ajiopoi·hshw toy eda·foyw thw, me epi·kentro kyri·vw ton toyristiko· tome·a;