title: PREGUNTA ESCRITA n. 3803/97 del José APOLINÁRIO a la Comisión. El IFOP y el turismo

eurovoc_concepts:
Community support framework
EU programme
European Regional Development Fund
FIFG
credit
credit policy
member country
project of common interest
tourism

formats: html pdf print

text: 16. 6. 98 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas C 187/61 (98/C 187/96) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-3803/97 de Jose· Apolina·rio (PSE) a la Comisio·n (26 de noviembre de 1997) Asunto: El IFOP y el turismo Considerando la respuesta de la Comisio·n a mi pregunta E-2036/97 (1) sobre la distribucio·n de las intervenciones del FEDER por Estado miembro, ¿puede la Comisio·n indicar, por lo que se refiere al IFOP, el importe de los cre·ditos asignados al turismo en los diferentes programas operativos de cada Marco Comunitario de Apoyo y por cada Estado miembro? (1) DO C 391 de 23. 12. 1997, p. 151. Respuesta de la Sra. Bonino en nombre de la Comisio·n (27 de enero de 1998) Las intervenciones del Instrumento Financiero de Orientacio·n de la Pesca (IFOP) se limitan estrictamente a los proyectos desarrollados en el sector de la pesca. Los proyectos desarrollados en el sector del turismo corresponden al Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional. (98/C 187/97) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-3804/97 de Jose· Apolina·rio (PSE) a la Comisio·n (26 de noviembre de 1997) Asunto: El Fondo Social Europeo y el turismo Considerando la respuesta de la Comisio·n a mi pregunta E-2036/97 (1) sobre la distribucio·n de las intervenciones del FEDER por Estado miembro, ¿puede la Comisio·n indicar, por lo que se refiere al Fondo Social Europeo, el importe de los cre·ditos asignados al turismo en los diferentes programas operativos de cada Marco Comunitario de Apoyo, en cada uno de los quince Estados miembros? (1) DO C 391 de 23. 12. 1997, p. 151. Respuesta del Sr. Flynn en nombre de la Comisio·n (30 de enero de 1998) La Comisio·n env(cid:14)·a directamente a Su Sen(cid:152)or(cid:14)·a y a la Secretar(cid:14)·a General del Parlamento un cuadro con la informacio·n solicitada. (98/C 187/98) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-3805/97 de Jose· Apolina·rio (PSE) a la Comisio·n (26 de noviembre de 1997) Asunto: El FEOGA-Orientacio·n y el turismo Considerando la respuesta de la Comisio·n a mi pregunta E-2036/97 (1) sobre la distribucio·n de las intervenciones del FEDER por Estado miembro, ¿puede la Comisio·n indicar, por lo que se refiere al FEOGA-Orientacio·n, el importe de los cre·ditos asignados al turismo en los diferentes programas operativos de cada Marco Comunitario de Apoyo, y por cada Estado miembro? (1) DO C 391 de 23. 12. 1997, p. 151


title: Kommissionens direktiv 97/65/EF af 26. november 1997 om tredje tilpasning til de tekniske fremskridt af Rådets direktiv 90/679/EØF om beskyttelse af arbejdstagerne mod farerne ved at være udsat for biologiske agenser under arbejdet (EØS-relevant tekst)

eurovoc_concepts:
animal disease
application of EU law
biotechnology
health risk
occupational health
occupational safety

formats: html pdfa1b print


title: ΓΡΑΠΤΗ ΕΡΩΤΗΣΗ αρ θ. 3803/97 του Jose APOLINARIO προς την Επ τροπή. Το IFOP (Χρηματοδοτικό Μέσο Προσανατολισμού της Αλιείας) και ο τουρισμός

formats: pdf print

text: 16. 6. 98 EL Epi·shmh Efhmeri·da tvn Eyrvpai¤kv· n Koinoth·tvn C 187/61 (98/C 187/96) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-3803/97 ypobolh· : Jose· Apolina·rio (PSE) prow thn Epitroph· (26 Noembri·oy 1997) Ue·ma: To IFOP (Xrhmatodotiko· Me·so Prosanatolismoy· thw Aliei·aw) kai o toyrismo·w (cid:201)xontaw ypo·ch thn apa·nthsh thw Epitroph·w sthn erv· thsh· moy E-2036/97 (1) sxetika· me thn katanomh· tvn dra·sevn toy ETPA ana· kra·tow me·low, ua mporoy·se a·rage h Epitroph· na moy para· sxei thn i·dia plhrofo·rhsh o·son afora· to XMPA kai, eidiko·tera, ta posa· poy diate·uhkan gia ton toyrismo· sta plai·sia tvn diafo·rvn leitoyrgikv· n programma·tvn gia ka·ue koinotiko· plai·sio sth·rijhw kai gia ka·ue kra·tow me·low; (1) EE C 391 thw 23. 12. 1998, 151. Apa· nthsh thw k. Bonino ej ono·matow thw Epitroph· w (27 Ianoyari·oy 1997) Oi paremba·seiw toy xrhmatodotikoy· me·soy prosanatolismoy· thw aliei·aw (XMPA) prori·zontai aysthra· gia ta e·rga toy tome·a thw aliei·aw. Ta e·rga toy tome·a toy toyrismoy· ypa· gontai sto Eyrvpai¤ko· Tamei·o Perifereiakh·w Ana·ptyjhw. (98/C 187/97) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-3804/97 ypobolh· : Jose· Apolina·rio (PSE) prow thn Epitroph· (26 Noembri·oy 1997) Ue·ma: To Eyrvpa(cid:14)¤ko· Koinvniko· Tamei·o kai o toyrismo·w (cid:201)xontaw ypo·ch thn apa·nthsh thw Epitroph·w sthn erv· thsh· moy E-2036/97 (1) sxetika· me thn katanomh· tvn dra·sevn toy ETPA ana· kra·tow me·low, ua mporoy·se a·rage h Epitroph· na moy para·sxei thn i·dia plhrofo·rhsh o·son afora· to Eyrvpai¤ko· Koinvniko· Tamei·o kai, eidiko·tera, ta posa· poy diate·uhkan gia ton toyrismo· sta plai·sia tvn diafo·rvn leitoyrgikv· n programma· tvn se ka·ue koinotiko· plai·sio sth·rijhw kai gia ka·ue e·na apo· ta 15 kra·th me·lh; (1) EE C 391 thw 23. 12. 1998, 151. Apa· nthsh toy k. Flynn ej ono·matow thw Epitroph· w (30 Ianoyari·oy 1998) H Epitroph· diabiba·zei apeyuei·aw sto Ajio·timo Me·low toy Koinoboyli·oy kai sth Genikh· Grammatei·a toy Orga·noy aytoy· pi·naka poy perie·xei tiw plhrofori·ew poy zhth·uhkan. (98/C 187/98) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-3805/97 ypobolh· : Jose· Apolina·rio (PSE) prow thn Epitroph· (26 Noembri·oy 1997) Ue·ma: EGTPE › prosanatolismoy· kai o toyrismo·w (cid:201)xontaw ypo·ch thn apa·nthsh thw Epitroph·w sthn erv· thsh· moy E-2036/97 (1) sxetika· me thn katanomh· tvn dra·sevn toy ETPA ana· kra·tow me·low, ua mporoy·se a·rage h Epitroph· na moy para· sxei thn i·dia plhrofo·rhsh o·son afora· to EGTPE-prosanatolismoy· kai, eidiko·tera, ta posa· poy diate·uhkan gia ton toyrismo· sta plai·sia tvn diafo·rvn leitoyrgikv· n programma·tvn ka·ue koinotikoy· plaisi·oy sth·rijhw gia ka·ue kra·tow me·low; (1) EE C 391 thw 23. 12. 1998, 151


title: 98/4/ECSC: Commission Decision of 26 November 1997 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty (Case IV/36.069 Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl) (Only the German text is authentic)

eurovoc_concepts:
ECSC Treaty
Germany
exchange of information
infringement of EU law
inter-company agreement
iron and steel product

text: L 1/10 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities 3. 1. 98 COMMISSION COMMISSION DECISION of 26 November 1997 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty (Case IV/36. 069 Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl) (Only the German text is authentic) (98/4/ECSC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community, and in particular Article 65 thereof, Having regard to the notification submitted on 28 May 1996 in the name of the Wirtschaftsvereinigung and 16 of its members, Having regard to the information transmitted to the Commission pursuant to Article 47 of the ECSC Treaty on 24 September 1996, Having regard to the written comments submitted pursuant to Article 36 of the ECSC Treaty in the name and on behalf of the parties on 29 April 1997 and taking note of the fact that, by letter dated 12 May 1997, the parties to submit oral comments, formally waived their right Whereas: I. FACTS A. PROCEDURE (1) On 28 May 1996 an information exchange system was notified to the Commission in the name and on behalf of the Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl, the German steel industry trade association, and 16 of its members. 2-72, 2-73 and 2-74 for the 16 undertakings concerned and the past four years, the Commission sent a statement of objections to the parties on 4 March 1997. The parties submitted their comments on 29 April 1997. While they did not in any way dispute the facts as set out in the statement of objections and recounted below, they stated that, in their view, those facts did not constitute an infringement of the competition rules. B. THE PARTIES (2) (3) The notification was submitted in the name of 16 German steel producers and that of the trade asso- ciation to which they belong, the Wirtschaftsver- einigung Stahl (1). The Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl (hereinafter called the WV) is an association bringing together almost every German steel undertaking and a number of Belgian and Luxembourg associate members. Its object is to defend its members’ collective in- terests. Its functions include keeping its members informed of new developments and representing them before national and Community authorities. The WV is a member of Eurofer, an association of Community steel undertakings and of national associations of European steel undertakings. A warning letter was sent to the association on 8 July 1996. In view of the extremely brief nature of the notification and following a meeting with the parties on 31 July, a request for information was sent to them pursuant to Article 47 of the ECSC Treaty. Following analysis of the reply comprising, among other things, all the questionnaires 2-71, (4) The 16 notifying undertakings belong to six sep- arate groups, namely: Usinor, Cockerill-Sambre, Preussag, Arbed, Thyssen and Krupp. (1) The names of the 16 notifying undertakings appear in bold type. 3. 1. 98 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities L 1/11 (5) AG der Dillinger H(cid:129)ttenwerk (hereinafter called Dillinger) produces ordinary steel and alloy steel (excluding stainless steel), which it processes into hot-rolled flat products. The French undertaking Usinor, which, through subsidaries, produces steel products of every shape and quality, holds 48,75 % of the share capital of Dillinger. Usinor is the second largest steel producer in the Community and the fourth largest in the world. It controls either alone or jointly the following producers of steel (including finished products): — in France: Sollac SA, Creusot Loire Industrie, Unim(cid:130)tal, Ascom(cid:130)tal, Imphy, Lorfonte, Ugine, Ugine Savoie, GTS, Allevard, Fortech and Tecphy, — in Germany: Dillinger and its subisdiary Rogesa, undertaking ARBED) — in Spain: Sidmed (jointly with the Luxembourg based and Galmed (jointly with the Luxembourg based under- taking ARBED and the German undertaking Thyssen Stahl AG), — in Portugal: Siderurgia Nacional Produtos Planos (jointly with the Dutch undertaking Hoogovens, the eighth-ranking steel producer in the Community), (7) (8) — in Italy: La Magona (jointly with the Italian (9) undertaking Lucchini), — in Luxembourg: SA Train (cid:133) Fil Esch-Schifflange and Sogerail. Dillinger is a member of both the WV and Eurofer. Usinor participates in Eurofer thropugh the F(cid:130)d(cid:130)ra- tion Fran(cid:135)aise de l’Acier. (10) (6) EKO Stahl GmbH (hereinafter called EKO) produces ordinary and alloy steel (excluding stain- less steel), which it processes into hot-rolled, cold- rolled and coated flat products EKO is a subsidiary of the Belgian undertaking Cockerill-Sambre, which, through subsidiaries, produces steel products of every shape and quality. Cockerill-Sambre seventh-ranking steel the producer in Europe and occupies a very prominent position in the market for flat products. It controls either alone or jointly the following producers of steel (including finished products): is — in Germany: EKO, — in France: Beautor, PUM and Haironville, — in Luxembourg: Galvalange (with the Luxem- bourg undertaking ARBED). Cockerill-Sambre participates in Eurofer through the Groupement de la Sid(cid:130)rurgie Belge. Krupp Hoesch Stahl AG (2) (hereinafter called KHS) produces both directly and through subsidi- aries steel products of every shape and quality. KHS is the sixth-ranking steel producer in Europe. Besided Krupp Thyssen Nirosta and Rasselstein, which are also notifying parties (see below) and which it controls jointly with Thyssen, KHS controls the following producers of steel (including finished products) in Germany: Hoesch Hohen- limburg, Krupp VDM, Krupp Edelstahlpro- file, and HSP Hoesch Spundwand und Profil. KHS is a member of the WV and Eurofer. Krupp Thyssen Nirosta GmbH (hereinafter called KTN) produces stainless steel flat products. With a share of approximately 40 % of the flat products market, it is the leading producer of stain- less steel in Europe. KTN controls the only Italian producer of stainless steel flat products, Acciai Speciali Terni. Preussag Stahl AG (hereinafter called Preussag) produces in Germany ordinary steel and alloy steel (excluding stainless steel), most of which is processed into flat products and beams. Preussag is a member of the WV and Eurofer. (excluding stainless Stahlwerke Bremen GmbH (hereinafter called Stahlwerke Bremen) produces ordinary steel and alloy steel steel), which it processes into flat products. Stahlwerke Bremen is a subsidiary of the Luxembourg undertaking Arbed, which through subsidiaries produces steel products of every shape and quality. Arbed is the fourth- ranking steel producer in Europe. It controls alone or jointly the following producers of steel (in- cluding finished products): — in Luxembourg: Profilarbed, Laminoir de Dude- lange, Galvalange (jointly with Cockerill- Sambre (see above)), Ares, and Giebel (jointly with Ewald Giebel), — in Germany: Stahlwerke Bremen, Bregal (jointly with the Finnish undertaking Rautaruukki and the Japanese undertaking Itoh) and Stahlwerke Th(cid:129)ringen, — in Belgium: Cockerill-Sambre, Carlam, Segal (jointly with the Dutch undertaking Hoogovens and the Luxembourg undertaking ARBED) and Delloye Mathieu, (2) By Decision of 28 July 1997, the Commission authorized pur- suant to Article 66 of the ECSC Treaty the merging of the flat carbon-steel products activities of Thyssen Stahl AG and Krupp Hoesch Stahl AG. L 1/12 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities 3. 1. 98 — in Belgium: Sidmar, ALZ (stainless steel), Sikel, Segal (jointly with the Dutch undertaking Hoogovens and the Belgian undertaking Cock- erill-Sambre (see above)), Decosteel and Galtec (jointly with the Dutch undertaking Hoogo- vens), — in France: Stul, — in Spain: Aceralia. (11) Stahlwerke Bremen is a member of the WV and Eurofer. Arbed participates in Eurofer through the Groupement des Industries Sid(cid:130)rurgiques Luxem- bourgeoises. the fifth-ranking steel producer Thyssen Stahl AG (3) (hereinafter called Thyssen) produces both directly and through subsidiaries steel products of every shape and quality. Thyssen in Europe. is Besides KTN (see above) and Rasselstein (see below), which are also notifying parties and which it controls jointly with KHS, Thyssen controls alone or jointly the following producers of steel (including finished products): — the market shares held for each of the products by the producers on the German market and in the Community, — data on deliveries by each producer of the various ECSC products in each of the Member States qualities combined, (questionnaire 2-71), all — data on deliveries by each producer of the various ECSC products in certan third countries and by geographic area (questionnaire 2-72), — deliveries of steel on the national market by product according to qualities and by consumer industry (questionnaire 2-73), — deliveries of certain qualities of steel by product in each of the Member States (questionnaire 2-74). The exchange is therefore concerned solely with data on deliveries and on market shares. 2. Aggregation of the data — in Germany: R(cid:148)hrenwerke Bous (jointly with Mannesmann), Rasselstein Hoesch GmbH, EBG Bochum, Stahlwerk Oberhausen GmbH, Walzdraht Hochfeld GmbH (4), and WK Edelstahl Witten Krefeld GmbH. (14) All the data exchanged are individual. All those taking part in the system receive all the informa- tion concerning the other producers, including that relating to products which they do not themselves produce. — in the Netherlands: Nedstaal, — in Spain: Galmed (jointly with the Luxembourg based undertaking ARBED and the French undertaking Usinor (see above)). Thyssen is a member of the WV and Eurofer. C. THE NOTIFIED AGREEMENT (12) (13) The notified agreement is an information exchange agreement. According to the parties, the agreement is informal (formlose Vereinbarung). Participation is voluntary. 1. Nature of the information The exchange relates to questionnaires 2-71 to 2-74 ECSC (5) and to the market shares of producers in Germany. These questionnaires, which were drawn up by the Commission, are transmitted to it pursuant the ECSC Treaty to enable it to ‘carry out its duties laid down in Article 3 of the ECSC Treaty’. The notifying parties have decided to exchange: to Article 47 of (3) See footnote 2. (4) This undertaking has been acquired by the ISPAT group after the notification. (5) Commission Decision No 1566/86/ECSC (OJ L 141, 28. 5. 1986, p. 1), as last amended by Decision No 3641/92/ECSC (OJ L 376, 22. 12. 1992, p. 1). The data are processed by the Statistical Office. They are aggregated and serve as a basis for the production of detailed statistics. (15) Market shares are calculated by determining the ratio between the deliveries by each producer and total deliveries in Germany calculated as follows: Deliveries in Germany (questionnaire 2-71) + Intra-Community deliveries (statistics of the SBA (6)) + Imports from third countries (statistics of the SBA) 5 Statistical corrections = Deliveries on the German market (16) The data are presented by product and by country of delivery. Cross-checking between questionnaires 2-71 and 2-74 makes it possible to break down deliveries by quality of steel. A distinction can be made between 45 different products and eight qualities of steel. With regard to deliveries on the German market (questionnaire 2-73), a distinction can be made between 28 different consumer sectors. 3. Age of the data (17) The data are exchanged at the end of the month following the period to which they relate. What is involved, therefore, is a monthly exchange of recent data (one month old). (6) Statistisches Bundesamt. 3. 1. 98 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities L 1/13 4. Structure of the system Decision 94/215/ECSC (9) in the field of beams). The main Community steel groups were involved in these cases. (18) The WV collects the data from the various under- takings which send them to it in different forms (letter, electronic mail, etc). The exchanged data are not made available to third parties. (22) Its employees are independent of Data are not discussed at members’ meetings. its members. (19) Only 16 undertakings out of the 74 members of the WV have notified their participation in the system, but the stated objective of the WV is that all should join in the not-too-distant future. The 16 notifying undertakings account for 94 % of all de- liveries by German undertakings of flat products and 27 % of all deliveries of long products (in- cluding 100 % for sheet piling and 80 % for per- manent way material). D. THE PRODUCT MARKETS 1. The steel industry: general remarks (20) Between 1977 and 1988 the Community steel industry was governed by more or less binding production quota or delivery arrangements coupled with measures concerning prices and external trade. These arrangements came to an end on 30 June 1988. The Commission nevertheless introduced a system for monitoring production and deliveries by producers in the Community and in third coun- tries. As part of this system, each undertaking was required to declare its deliveries to the Commis- sion. The system expired in 1990. Faced with a worsening situation in the steel industry, in March 1993 the Commission adopted guidelines relating to production and deliveries of steel products within the Community market (7). These guidelines for were products within their product range. Following a marked improvement in the situation in the steel market in 1994, the Commission decided to ter- minate the measure. communicated to all undertakings (21) In the course of the last seven years, the Commis- sion has adopted two Decisions relating to infringe- ments of Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty (Decision 90/471/ECSC (8) in the field of stainless steel, and (7) OJ C 83, 24. 3. 1993, p. 6. (8) OJ L 220, 15. 8. 1990, p. 28. The steel industry is highly capital-intensive, espe- cially in the flat-products sector. There are there- fore considerable barriers to entry, linked to the initial cost of the necessary investment. Fixed costs are very high. The steel industry suffers from chronic overcapacity due among other things to the size of the exit barriers. To help reduce these, in financial 1993 the Commission authorized a mechanism facilitating the closure of production capacity for heavy sections, hot-rolled wide coils and strip, and reversing-mill plate (10). (23) Until the 1980s, steel undertakings had often been public undertakings with a very distinct national character. Major merger operations and the forma- tion of new undertakings have led to the emer- gence of European groups with plants in a number of Member flows States. Nevertheless, between Member States are remarkably stable. trade (24) (25) Except in the case of stainless steel, consumption of which is increasing, the European steel markets are mature markets. The products made by the various producers are homogeneous. As a rule customers have no preference between one supplier and another: the quality of products is transparent and the various parameters (delivery periods, trans- port costs, etc. ) easy to compare. Steel undertakings are required pursuant to Article 60 of the ECSC Treaty to publish their price lists. This obligation is discharged by sending the lists to the Commission at least two working days before they enter into force. Undertakings are also obliged to communicate their lists to any interested party who so requests. Owing to its having been regulated for so long, there are numerous sources of detailed statistical data in the steel industry. (9) OJ L 116, 6. 5. 1994, p. 1. (10) Commission Decision 94/6/ECSC of 21 December 1993 au- thorizing common financial arrangements in respect of indi- vidual programmes involving the closure of production capa- city in the Community steel industry for heavy sections, hot- rolled wide coils and strip, and reversing-mill plate (OJ L 6, 8. 1. 1994, p. 30). L 1/14 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities 3. 1. 98 2. The various markets for steel products (26) Steel is made either from iron ore (‘integrated steel- works’ (11)) or from scrap (‘electric steelworks’ (12)). Integrated steelworks account for approximately 70 % of all steel production in the Community. The steel obtained from melting ore or scrap (semi-finished products in the form of ingots, slabs, blooms and billets) is not usable as such and has to be rolled to give it its final shape and properties. (27) In terms of their shape, there are two major cat- egories of product: — flat products obtained in the form of sheets (plates) or of coils (band steel). Products which are simply hot-rolled may subsequently be cold-rolled and coated (tinplate, galvanized sheets). Most flat products (apart from those of stainless steel) are made in integrated steel- works. Flat products are used to make pipes and tubes, ships, boilers, buildings, cars, packaging, etc. , — long products: concrete reinforcing bars, rods, beams, joists, wire rod. Long products are used in sectors such as construction, bolt, nut and screw manufacture, wire drawing, etc. (28) According to their composition, a distinction is made between non-alloy steels, stainless and heat- resisting steels and other alloy steels. (29) The products listed in the questionnaires forming the subject matter of the notification belong to different product markets depending on their characteristics, the use to which they are put, and the plant and know-how needed to produce them. There are 23 product markets in all: semi-finished products, 12 flat product markets and 10 long product markets. (a) Semi-finished products (30) After solidification, crude steel takes the form of large blocks (ingots, slabs, blooms, billets) which must be rolled, that is to say passed between rollers which reduce the thickness of the blocks and give them their final shape. Most producers of finished products produce steel for their own purposes, but they also sell part of the semi-finished products (11) Very large plants (coking, sintering, blast furnaces, conver- ters); very little operating flexibility; average minimum capa- city of some 2 million tonnes a year; very high initial invest- ment and maintenance costs. (12) Limited investment (electric furnace); considerable operating flexibility. they produce. Of the 152 million tonnes of crude steel produced in 1995, approximately 24 million were sold in the form of semi-finished products. There are more than 125 undertakings or groups producing crude steel in Europe. The market is therefore dispersed. (b) Flat products (31) There are 12 markets for flat products: Hot-rolled wide strip of non-alloy steel: These products may be sold without further processing (as is the case with 40 % of production) or be processed into cold-rolled sheet, which in turn may be sold further processing or coated. the level of There are 12 undertakings or groups in the Community which are independent of one another at the production of wide strip. However, when it comes to processing such hot- rolled wide strip into cold-rolled sheet or coated sheet (which accounts for 60 % of production), there are in the Community 10 joint ventures, including (which means cooperatives performing no marketing func- tion): only seven of the 12 groups referred to above are totally independent of one another. six production cooperatives Hot-rolled wide strip of stainless steel: There are only six producers in the Community, of which the three largest account for 70 % of production. Hot-rolled wide strip of alloy (excluding stainless) steel: There are 10 or so producers in the Com- munity. Deliveries by German undertakings in Europe account for more than half of all deliveries by European undertakings. Cold-rolled sheet of non-alloy steel: Cold rolling helps to reduce further the thickness of products and to endow them with special properties. Hot- rolled wide sheet may be cold reduced. Two thirds of cold-reduced sheet is then coated. The price of cold-reduced sheet is 25 % higher than that of hot-rolled wide strip. Only seven of the 13 existing producers are totally independent of one another. Cold-rolled sheet of stainless steel: There are only six producers in the Community, of which the three largest account for 70 % of production. Cold-rolled sheet of alloy (excluding stainless) steel: There are 10 or so producers in the Com- munity. Deliveries by German undertakings in Europe account for 37 % of all deliveries by Euro- pean undertakings. 3. 1. 98 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities L 1/15 Coated sheet (with the exception of steel for pack- aging or tinplate): More than 90 % of coated, non-tinned sheet is galvanized sheet. Nearly half of all cold-rolled sheet is coated with a metal coating other than tin (by hot dipping or by electrolysis). This operation increases the sheet’s value by approximately 40 %. There are a dozen producers in the Community. There are in the Community 10 joint ventures, including six production cooperatives (cooperatives without any marketing function): only five of those 12 producers are totally independent of one another. Steel for packaging (or tinplate): Cold-rolled sheet is sold tinned, that is, coated with a tin coating to protect it from oxidation. The value added by the tinning is of the order of 60 %. There are eight producers in the Community, of which the two largest for 45 % of Community production. account Reversing-mill plate and universal plate of non- alloy steel: These consist of thick, uncoiled sheet. There are 20 or so undertakings or groups in the Community, of which the three largest account for 44 % of production. Reversing-mill plate and universal plate of stain- less steel: There are only five undertakings or groups in the Community, of which the two largest account for more than 60 % of deliveries in the Community. Reversing-mill plate of alloy (other than stainless) steel: There are fewer than 15 undertakings or groups in the in the Community. Deliveries Community by German undertakings account for more than half of all deliveries by European under- takings in the Community. Electrical sheet: There are eight undertakings or groups in the Community, of which the two largest account for more than 60 % of production. The markets for flat products are therefore all concentrated. (c) Long products (32) There are 10 markets for long products. Beams and sections for mine shafts: 20 or so in the undertakings or groups produce beams Community, of which the four largest account for more than 65 % of production. Wire rod of non-alloy steel: There are forty or so in the Community, of undertakings or groups which the four largest account for more than 40 % of production. Wire rod of stainless steel: There are eight produ- cers in the Community. Wire rod of alloy (other than stainless) steel: There are 30 or so undertakings or groups in the in the Community by Community. Deliveries German undertakings account for 25 % of all de- liveries by European undertakings in the Com- munity. Concrete reinforcing bars: There are more than 50 undertakings or groups in the Community, or which the four largest account for more than 40 % of production. Merchant bars of non-alloy steel: There are more than 80 undertakings or groups in the Community. The five largest account for 40 % of production. Merchant bars of stainless steel: There are 15 or so undertakings or groups in the Community. Merchant bars of alloy (other than stainless) steel: In the absence of more detailed information, it may be assumed that a large number of merchant bar producers produce both non-alloy steels and alloy steels. Permanent way material: There are 10 or so in the Community, of undertakings or groups which the three largest account for more than half of production. Sheet piling: There are only four undertakings or groups in the Community. The structures of the various markets for long products are therefore diversified. Some markets are highly concentrated (sheet piling, beams, per- manent way material), while others are more dispersed (concrete reinforcing bars, merchant bars, wire rod). E. THE GEOGRAPHIC MARKET for (33) Numerous decisions pursuant to Article 66 of the ECSC Treaty have established that the relevant the the various market is Community market owing inter alia to the lack of barriers to intra-Community trade and the volume of intra-Community trade, which represents 30 % of all deliveries by Community producers in the Community. steel products (34) Nevertheless, this finding must be qualified to some extent. The figure of approximately 30 % stems from the fact that, firstly, a large number of countries do not produce the full range of products and, secondly, there are countries whose ‘domestic’ market is very small compared with the output of the national producer. Moreover, where there is a its deliveries on its domestic national producer, market account for more than half of all deliveries by Community producers on that market (13) and the market shares of the other producers on each market are fairly stable over time. (13) This is especially the case with flat products, special steels and certain long products (sheet piling, permanent way mate- rial and sections for mine shafts). L 1/16 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities 3. 1. 98 F. POSITION OF GERMAN UNDERTAKINGS COMPARED WITH THAT OF OTHER COMMUNITY UNDERTAKINGS (35) Deliveries by German undertakings: Share of German undertakings in deliveries by Community undertakings in the Community in 1995 (%) Non-alloy steels Stainless steel Other alloy steels Hot-rolled wide strip Cold-rolled sheet Coated sheet Steel for packaging Reversing-mill plate Electrical sheet Beams Wire rod Merchant steels Concrete reinforcing bars Sheet piling Permanent way material Total 25 26 28 19 25 36 26 31 10 11 40 25 24 18 24 — — 24 — — 11 17 — — — 21 51 37 21 — 51 38 52 25 25 — — — 38 Share of German undertakings in deliveries by Community undertakings in Germany in 1995 (%) Non-alloy steels Stainless steel Other alloy steels Hot-rolled wide strip Cold-rolled sheet Coated sheet Steel for packaging Reversing-mill plate Electrical sheet Beams Wire rod Merchant steel Concrete reinforcing bars Sheet piling Permanent way material Total 76 67 68 71 66 93 57 77 38 60 73 76 67 44 55 — — 46 — — 46 52 — — — 52 84 57 38 — 89 84 72 67 66 — — — 76 3. 1. 98 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities L 1/17 G. LINKS WITH UNDERTAKINGS LOCATED IN OTHER MEMBER STATES (36) Account must also be taken of the fact that some German undertakings form part of larger European steel groups: — the British undertaking British Steel controls Manstaedtwerke, — the French undertaking Usinor holds 48,75 % of the share capital of Dillinger, — the Belgian undertaking Cockerill-Sambre controls Eko Stahl, (39) As the Commission decided in the ‘UK Tractors’ case (14), an agreement to exchange information which is both sensitive, recent and individualized in a concentrated market where there are important barriers to entry, is liable to restrict competition between the undertakings parties thereto in so far as it increases market transparency to such a degree that any independent competitive action on the part of an undertaking can immediately be noticed by its competitors, which are able to take suitable retaliatory measures. By eliminating any hidden competition in the market, information exchange reduces considerably the advantage to be gained by an undertaking from competitive action and tends to dissuade it from trying to increase its market share. the — the Luxembourg undertaking Arbed controls Stahlwerke Bremen, Stahlwerke Th(cid:129)ringen and Bregal, (40) — the Italian undertaking Riva controls Henn- ingsdorf and Brandenburger, — the Italian undertaking Feralpi controls ESF Riesa, — the Finnish undertaking Rautaruukki controls Bregal with Arbed. (37) Similarly, German undertakings have interests in other Member States: Krupp and Thyssen in Italy (AST) and Thyssen in Spain (Galmed). their This view was upheld on 27 October 1994 by the Court of First Instance, which held in the UK Tractors case (15) that general use, as between main suppliers, of exchanges of precise information at short intervals, identifying registered vehicles and the place of registration is, on a highly concentrated oligopolistic market on which compe- tition is already greatly reduced and exchange of likely to impair consid- information facilitated, erably the competition which exists between traders. In such circumstances, the sharing, on a regular and frequent basis, of information con- cerning the operation of the market has the effect of periodically revealing to all competitors the market positions and strategies of the various indi- vidual competitors. II. ASSESSMENT A. ARTICLE 65 (1) 1. General (38) Article 65 (1) of the ECSC Treaty prohibits all agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted prac- tices indirectly to prevent, restrict or distort normal competition within the common market, particularly those tending: tending directly or (a) to fix or determine prices; (b) to restrict or control production, technical de- velopment or investment; (c) to share the markets, products, customers or sources of supply. (41) Although they concern Article 85 of the EC Treaty, these findings are transposable to Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty, both Treaties being motivated, as the Court of Justice held in its judgment of 18 May 1962 (16), by a ‘common intention’. Moreover, the Commission normally interprets similar fashion the prohibition in Article 65 (1) of the ECSC Treaty and that in Article 85 (1) of the EC Treaty, notably as regards exchanges of information between undertakings. In the notice concerning agreements, decisions and concerted practices in the field of cooperation between enterprises (17), the Commission viewed such cooperation in the same way under both Treaties. in a (14) Commission Decision 92/157/EEC of 17 February 1992 re- lating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 85 of the EEC Treaty — UK Agricultural Tractor Registration Exchange (OJ L 68, 13. 3. 1992, p. 19). (15) Judgments in Cases T-34/92, Fiatagri UK Ltd and New Hol- land Ford Ltd v. Commission [1994] ECR II, p. 905, at para- graph 91 and T-35/92, John Deere Ltd v. Commission [1994] ECR II p. 957, at paragraph 51. (16) Case 13/60 ‘Geitling’, Ruhrk(cid:148)hlen-Verkaufsgesellschaft mbH and others v. High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community [1962] ECR p. 165. (17) OJ C 75, 29. 7. 1968, p. 3, corrigendum OJ C 84, 28. 8. 1968, p. 14. L 1/18 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities 3. 1. 98 2. Restrictive effects of the notified agree- ment (42) The undertakings decided to exchange question- naires ECSC 2-71, 2-72, 2-73 and 2-74 (see foot- note 5). The latter two are inextricably linked to the first, which must therefore be analysed first. (a) Questionnaires 2-71, 2-73 and 2-74 (43) Questionnaire 2-71 is concerned with data on de- liveries by type of product and by Member State of destination. They are individual, monthly and recent data. They are sensitive and confidential inasmuch as they make it possible to establish the various undertakings’ market position. Combined with questionnaires 2-73 and 2-74, this question- naire reveals the strategy of each undertaking in each Member State for the various products (45 products, eight qualities), and more particularly on the German market (28 different consumer sectors). (44) The assessment of the notified exchange is directly linked to the degree of concentration of the market for the products in question and to its character- istics. The case-law (see above) has clearly es- tablished that the restriction of competition stems from the fact that, on an oligopolistic market, the exchange increases transparency in such a way as to deter competition between participants. (45) All the markets for flat products and those for beams, sheet piling, permanent way material and stainless steel wire rod are concentrated. The concentration must be assessed in the light of various criteria, including the number of producers present in the market, the existence of structural links between them, the combined market shares of the main undertakings, and the barriers to entry. In the present case, for flat products, beams, sheet piling, permanent way material and wire rod of stainless steel, the number of producers in Europe is no greater than 20 (see above). For all these products, the sum of the production of the four leading producers comes to more than half of total production. The barriers to entry are very high owing to the capital intensity of the industry. There are numerous structural links between the steel groups. Thus, for example, only seven of the 12 producers of hot-rolled wide strip and sheet and five of the 12 producers of coated sheet are totally independent of one another (see above). These markets may therefore be characterized as highly concentrated markets. (46) On these concentrated markets, the notified deci- sion to carry out the exchange of information in question is liable to restrict competition. The fact of informing one’s competitors each month of de- liveries of each product in the different Member States and of one’s market shares in one’s domestic market is likely to deter them from trying to increase market shares. Competitors will be able to identify those undertakings which try to increase their market share and to take retaliatory measures against them. The notified exchange is therefore liable to induce undertakings to abandon a funda- mental competitive activity consisting in increasing their market shares. The period during which an undertaking can engage in competitive activity is greatly reduced by the frequency of the exchange and the recentness of the data exchanged. By re- moving any remaining hidden competition in markets characterized by a small degree of openess, by fairly stable trade flows between Member States, by considerable homogeneity of products and chronic overcapacity, the notified agreement makes highly probable the development of behaviour having the effect of freezing market shares. (47) (48) The undertakings party to the agreement account for approximately one quarter of all Community deliveries in the Community. The notified infor- mation exchange is liable to restrict competition appreciably. This effect is even more noticeable on the German market, where the undertakings account for between one half and three-quarters of Community deliveries. there For some of these products (beams, grain-oriented electrical sheet, steel for packaging, most stainless steel products), is only one notifying producer. The undertakings to which it would communicate the date relating to its deliveries are not active on the same product market and there is therefore no restriction of competition directly caused by that exchange. However, some of the undertakings which receive data but are not competitors of the data-provider are controlled by undertakings which themselves control competitors of the data provider. There is no guarantee that such particularly sensitive data would not end up in the hands of such competitors. In view of the above, the Commission considers that the exchange of questionnaires 2-71, 2-73 and 2-74 restricts competition in respect of the fol- lowing products: 3. 1. 98 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities L 1/19 Product Lines of question- naire 2-71 Lines of question- naire 2-73 Lines of question- naire 2-74 Hot-rolled wide strip 311 to 336 311 to 336 8320, 8330 Cold-rolled sheet 411, 416 411, 416 8410 Coated sheet 451 to 457 451 to 457 Steel for packaging 430, 440 430, 440 Reversing-mill plate 341 to 350 341 to 350 8340 Electrical sheet 421 to 427 420 Beams 540 to 559 540, 550 1550, 8550 Wire rod of stainless steel 1510, 2510, 3510, 4510, 5510, 6510, 7510 and 8510 Permanent way material Sheet piling 570 560 570 560 (49) A large number of undertakings are active on the other product markets. The restrictive effect of an exchange of sensitive information is less marked in such cases. There is therefore no objection to the notified exchange in respect of the following products: semi-finished products, merchant bars, concrete reinforcing bars and wire rod (with the exception of wire rod of stainless steel). haviour of competitors may largely be anticipated on the basis of their recent transactions. The obser- vation of competitors’ behaviour and past per- formance is at the root of all the agreement’s res- trictive effects as described above. The more ac- curate and recent the information on quantities sold and market shares, the greater its impact on undertakings’ future market behaviour. (b) Questionnaire 2-72 (50) The Commission has no objections exchange of this questionnaire. to the 3. Arguments put forward by the parties (51) their notification, In support of the parties submitted a legal study and two economic studies. The main arguments put forward are outlined below. Age of the data (52) In their notification the parties state that: ‘The exchange is confined to the communication of data on quantities; no data on prices or turnover will be exchanged. The exchanged data concern only past conduct on the market and not future conduct’. In a market where demand is stable, as is the case with the relevant product markets, the future be- From a certain point in time, however, data con- cerning past transactions becomes truly historic and no longer has any real impact on future be- haviour (18). In the present case, although the exchanged data relate to a past period, they must be deemed to be recent if they are less than a year old (here, they are one month old). Proof of the restrictive effect (53) state that The notifying parties ‘the notified exchange of information is not caught by Article 65 (1) of the ECSC Treaty because it has neither as its object nor as its effect a restriction of competi- tion’. (18) Thus, for example, in the UK Tractors case the Commission considered that an annual exchange of one-year-old informa- tion on sales by the various competitors did not significantly distort competition (abovementioned Decision, recital 50). L 1/20 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities 3. 1. 98 of for being potentially anti-competitive The Commission considers that account must be taken not only of the immediate, visible effects of an agreement but also of its potential effects and of the fact that an agreement can create a structure anti-competitive used capable purposes. Article 65 (1) must be interpreted as covering effects because the objective of that provision is the main- tenance of an effective competitive structure. This in a highly objective is particularly material concentrated market where information an exchange creates a structure of transparency which prevents any hidden competition. The fact that the Commission has been unable to establish the exis- tence of an actual effect on the market therefore has no bearing on the outcome of the proceeding inasmuch as Article 65 (1) of the ECSC Treaty prohibits both actual anti-competitive effects and potential effects, provided that these are sufficiently marked. The UK Tractors judgment (54) The parties consider that the Court of First Instance in the UK Tractors case was to some extent unfavourable to the Commission. the judgment of According to the legal study submitted in support of the notification, the Court of First Instance only partly concurred with the Commission in the UK Tractors case, in that it required the exchanges, before they could constitute an infringement of Article 85 (1) of the EC Treaty, to take place on a concentrated market in which competition is already reduced. The Commission considers that this interpretation is wrong. In the above case, the Court of First Instance held (19) that general use, as between main suppliers, of exchanges of precise information at short intervals, identifying registered vehicles and registration is, on a highly the place of their concentrated oligopolistic market the market in question on which competition is, as a result, already greatly reduced and exchange of information facilitated, likely to impair consid- erably the competition which exists between traders. such as Impairment of competition was therefore con- sidered in the case in point, not as an additional condition for the application of Article 85 (1), but as a logical consequence of the oligopolistic nature of the relevant market. Competition in the relevant market (55) Following the logic of the argument set out above, submitted to the Commission an the parties (56) (57) (58) (59) (60) economic study which seeks to show that competi- tion in the steel market is intense. The study does not distinguish between the various product markets despite the fact that they differ considerably from one another (degree of concen- tration of the market, rate of utilization of produc- tion capacity, price trends, barriers to entry due inter alia to differences in fixed costs, transport costs, etc. ). In view of these various factors when it comes to assessing the restrictive effect of the furnished study is not really relevant to this case. the notified agreement, the importance of Existence of information on quantities in other economic sectors The parties submitted in support of their notifica- tion a study seeking to show that the availability of recent, individualized information in the consumer goods sector promotes competition and that the notified exchange would accordingly have a benefi- cial effect on competition. This argument is invalid, for two main reasons. First of all, they are not agreements between com- petitors capable of being caught by Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty or Article 85 of the EC Treaty. Specialist organizations carry out studies on the basis of surveys at the point of sale. Secondly, the information is sold by those organizations and not exchanged between competitors. However accurate those surveys are, this is an instance of a provision of services by a third party and not of an agreement capable of being assessed in the light of Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty. 4. Applicability of Article 65 (1) In a communication dated 31 December 1994 (20) concerning the withdrawal of the quarterly guide- lines relating to production and deliveries of steel products, the Commission reminded undertakings and their associations that pursuant to Article 65 (1) they are prohibited from replacing the flanking measures introduced so far by the Commission by a information exchange system. equivalent similar private or The exchange of questionnaires 2-71 and 2-73 is contrary to Article 65 (1) in that it institutes a system for the exchange of information on recent individual data on deliveries and market shares in the fields of flat products, beams, sheet piling and permanent way material. (19) See footnote 15. (20) OJ C 379, 31. 12. 1994, p. 36. 3. 1. 98 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities L 1/21 (61) The echange of questionnaire 2-74 is contrary to Article 65 (1) for the products mentioned above and for wire rod. (62) (63) (64) B. INAPPLICABILITY OF ARTICLE 65 (2) Since it is neither a specialization agreement nor a joint-buying or joint-selling agreement, the notified agreement cannot be authorized by the Commis- sion on the basis of Article 65 (2). C. APPLICABILITY OF ARTICLE 65 (5) Pursuant to Article 65 (5), the Commission may impose fines or periodic penalty payments on undertakings which have entered into an agree- ment which is automatically void or have enforced or attempted to enforce an agreement or decision which is automatically void, or have engaged in practices prohibited by paragraph 1 of that Article. In this case, the parties have stated that they have not implemented the notified agreement following the warning letter which the Commission sent to them on 8 July 1996. There are therefore no grounds for fining them, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Article 1 The information exchange agreement notified on 28 May 1996 infringes Article 65 of the ECSC Treaty in so far as it involves an exchange of questionnaires 2-71, 2-73 and 2-74 in respect of flat products, beams, sheet piling, permanent way material and wire rod of stainless steel. Article 2 The information exchange agreement notified on 28 May the conditions for authorization 1996 does not pursuant Article 65 (2). fulfil Article 3 The Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl and the 16 notifying undertakings shall refrain from implementing the notified exchange. Article 4 This Decision is addressed to: Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl Breitestraße 69 D-40213 D(cid:129)sseldorf AG der Dillinger H(cid:129)ttenwerke Postfach 1580 D-66748 Dillingen EKO Stahl GmbH Werkstraße 1 D-15890 Eisenh(cid:129)ttenstadt Krupp Hoesch Stahl AG Eberhardstraße 12 D-44145 Dortmund Krupp Thyssen Nirosta GmbH Alleestraße 165 D-44793 Bochum Preussag Stahl AG Eisenh(cid:129)ttenstraße 99 D-38239 Salzgitter Stahlwerke Bremen GmbH Auf den Delben 35 D-28237 Bremen Thyssen Stahl AG Kaiser-Wilhelm-Straße 100 D-47166 Duisburg. Done at Brussels, 26 November 1997. For the Commission Karel VAN MIERT Member of the Commission


title: ΓΡΑΠΤΗ ΕΡΩΤΗΣΗ αρ θ. 3801/97 του Cristiana MUSCARDINI προς την Επ τροπή. Ισοτιμία τίτλου σπουδών

eurovoc_concepts:
Italy
diploma
free movement of workers
job mobility
recognition of diplomas
right of establishment
single market

text: C 187/60 EL Epi·shmh Efhmeri·da tvn Eyrvpai¤kv· n Koinoth·tvn 16. 6. 98 Zhtoy·me apo· thn Epitroph· na maw gnvstopoih·sei ta peraite·rv stoixei·a o·pvw proble·petai stiw paragra·foyw 1 kai 2 thw apa·nthshw thw 28. 1. 1997. Zhtoy·me apo· thn Epitroph· na pei ea·n, ypo· to fvw tvn ne·vn aytv· n stoixei·vn, den uevrei·tai o·ti e·xoyn parabiastei· oi odhgi·ew poy anafe·rontai sthn prohgoy·menh grapth· erv· thsh, kai ea·n ayta· ta o·pla lei¤zer e·xoyn xrhsimopoihuei· kata· tro·po poy na synista· para·bash tvn koinotikv· n odhgiv· n; (1) EE C 186 thw 18. 06. 1997, sel. 41 (2) EE L 103 thw 25. 04. 1979, sel. 1 Apa· nthsh thw kaw Bjerregaard ej ono·matow thw Epitroph· w (16 Dekembri·oy 1997) Sthn apa·nthsh poy ei·xe dv· sei sth grapth· erv· thsh ariu. 3175/96 toy Ajio·timoy Me·loyw toy Eyrvpai¤koy· Koinoboyli·oy kai toy koy Ripa di Meana gia to i·dio ue·ma, h Epitroph· ei·xe epishma·nei o·ti oi italike·w arxe·w, sy·mfvna me to a·ruro 9 thw odhgi·aw 79/409/EOK (1) toy Symboyli·oy, o·feilan na diabiba·soyn e·kuesh. H e·kuesh ayth· poy ka·lypte thn peri·odo 1995-1996 diabiba·suhke telika· kata· ta te·lh Mai(cid:143)oy toy 1997 kai pro·sfata h ana·lysh· thw oloklhrv· uhke. Sthn e·kuesh den anafe·retai h dra· sh poy epikalei·tai to Ajio·timo Me·low. Gia to lo·go ayto·, h Epitroph· ua zhth·sei apo· tiw italike·w arxe·w peraite·rv plhrofori·ew. Oi plhrofori·ew poy pare·xoyn ta kra·th me·lh sthn Epitroph· den perilamba·noyn ekue·seiw gia th xrh·sh tvn thlebo·lvn me akti·new le·hzer poy den ei·nai sy·mfvna prow o·sa ori·zei h odhgi·a 79/409/EOK. Se peri·ptvsh poy oi apasxoloy·menoi sto Consorzio di Solidarieta‘ sociale thw Modena ypoxrev· uhkan na erga·zontai xvri·w kata·llhlh prostasi·a me epiki·ndynoyw ejoplismoy·w ergasi·aw o·pvw ta thlebo·la me akti·new le·hzer, to gegono·w pre·pei na gnvstopoihuei· stiw italike·w arxe·w, kai en prokeime·nv sthn epiuev· rhsh ergasi·aw thw xv· raw, poy ei·nai armo·diew gia ton e·legxo kai thn epith·rhsh o·pvw proble·pei to a·ruro 4 para·grafow 2 thw odhgi·aw 89/391/EOK (2) sxetika· me thn efarmogh· tvn me·trvn gia thn prov· uhsh thw asfa·leiaw kai thw ygei·aw tvn ergazome·nvn kata· thn ergasi·a. (1) EE L 103, 24. 05. 1979, o·pvw tropopoih·uhke me thn prosxv· rhsh thw Aystri·aw (EE L 1, 01. 01. 1995). (2) EE L 183, 29. 06. 1989. (98/C 187/95) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-3801/97 ypobolh· : Cristiana Muscardini (NI) prow thn Epitroph· (26 Noembri·oy 1997) Ue·ma: Isotimi·a ti·tloy spoydv· n (cid:201)xontaw ypo·ch o·ti apo· to 1993 e·xoyn anoi·jei ta sy·nora o·son afora· toyw ti·tloyw spoydv· n, kai o·ti se orisme·new xv· rew, metajy· tvn opoi·vn prv· th h Itali·a, ypa·rxoyn ti·tloi spoydv· n poy den anagnvri·zontai se a·lla kra·th me·lh thw (cid:201)nvshw• zhtei·tai apo· thn Eyrvpai¤kh· Epitroph· na pei ea·n proti·uetai h· o·xi na zhth·sei apo· ta kra·th me·lh na anagnvri·soyn thn isotimi·a tvn ti·tlvn spoydv· n oy·tvw v· ste na gi·nei, epite·loyw, pragmatiko·thta sthn Eyrv· ph h kinhtiko·thta sthn agora· ergasi·aw. Apa· nthsh toy k. Monti ej ono·matow thw Epitroph· w (6 Ianoyari·oy 1998) To Ajio·timo Me·low toy Koinoboyli·oy parakalei·tai na anatre·jei sthn apa·nthsh thw Epitroph·w sthn grapth· thw erv· thsh E-85/95 (1). (1) EE C 190 thw 24. 7. 1995


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3789/97 by David HALLAM to the Commission. Barrier to trade in Denmark: Veterinary pharmaceutical product, Super-Ov

eurovoc_concepts:
Denmark
United Kingdom
marketing restriction
pharmaceutical legislation
trade restriction
veterinary drug

formats: html print


title: QUESTION ECRITE no 3803/97 de José APOLINÁRIO à la Commission. IFOP et tourisme

text: 16. 6. 98 FR Journal officiel des Communaute·s europe·ennes C 187/61 (98/C 187/96) QUESTION E· CRITE E-3803/97 pose·e par Jose· Apolina·rio (PSE) a‘ la Commission (26 novembre 1997) Objet: IFOP et tourisme Eu e·gard a‘ la re·ponse de la Commission a‘ ma question E-2036/97 (1) sur la ventilation des interventions du FEDER par E· tat membre, peut-elle e·galement indiquer, pour ce qui est de l(cid:146)IFOP, le montant des cre·dits affecte·s au tourisme dans les diffe·rents programmes ope·rationnels pour chacun des cadres communautaires d(cid:146)appui et chacun des E· tats membres? (1) JO C 391 du 23. 12. 1997, p. 151. Re·ponse donne·e par Mme Bonino au nom de la Commission (27 janvier 1998) Les interventions de l(cid:146)Instrument financier d(cid:146)orientation de la pe(cid:136)che (IFOP) sont strictement limite·es aux projets dans le secteur de la pe(cid:136)che. Les projets dans le secteur du tourisme rele‘vent du Fonds europe·en du de·veloppement re·gional. (98/C 187/97) QUESTION E· CRITE E-3804/97 pose·e par Jose· Apolina·rio (PSE) a‘ la Commission (26 novembre 1997) Objet: Fonds social europe·en et tourisme Eu e·gard a‘ la re·ponse de la Commission a‘ ma question E-2036/97 (1) sur la ventilation des interventions du FEDER par E· tat membre, peut-elle e·galement indiquer, pour ce qui est du Fonds social europe·en, le montant des cre·dits affecte·s au tourisme dans les diffe·rents programmes ope·rationnels pour chacun des cadres communau- taires d(cid:146)appui et chacun des quinze E· tats membres? (1) JO C 391 du 23. 12. 1997, p. 151. Re·ponse donne·e par M. Flynn au nom de la Commission (30 janvier 1998) La Commission transmet directement a‘ l(cid:146)Honorable Parlementaire et au Secre·tariat ge·ne·ral du Parlement un tableau contenant les informations demande·es. (98/C 187/98) QUESTION E· CRITE E-3805/97 pose·e par Jose· Apolina·rio (PSE) a‘ la Commission (26 novembre 1997) Objet: FEOGA › section Orientation et tourisme Eu e·gard a‘ la re·ponse de la Commission a‘ ma question E-2036/97 (1) sur la ventilation des interventions du FEDER par E· tat membre, peut-elle e·galement indiquer, pour ce qui concerne le FEOGA › section Orientation, le montant des cre·dits affecte·s au tourisme dans les diffe·rents programmes ope·rationnels pour chacun des cadres communautaires d(cid:146)appui et chacun des E· tats membres? (1) JO C 391 du 23. 12. 1997, p. 151


title: VERORDENING (EG) Nr. 2337/97 VAN DE COMMISSIE van 26 november 1997 tot wijziging van de restituties bij uitvoer van witte en ruwe suiker in onveranderde vorm

eurovoc_concepts:
export refund
raw sugar
sugar product
white sugar


title: VERORDENING (EG) Nr. 2343/97 VAN DE COMMISSIE van 26 november 1997 tot vaststelling van de restituties bij uitvoer van olijfolie

eurovoc_concepts:
export refund
olive oil


title: SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG nr. 3802/97 van Cristiana MUSCARDINI aan de Commissie. Het afvoeren van aardrijkskunde van de leerprogramma's in Italië

eurovoc_concepts:
Italy
competence of the Member States
geography
national law
school legislation
secondary education
teaching

text: 16. 6. 98 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen C 187/19 (98/C 187/29) SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG E-3545/97 van Gerardo Ferna·ndez-Albor (PPE) aan de Commissie (12 november 1997) Betreft: Vooruitgang met betrekking tot harmonisatie op het gebied van autonummerborden Symbolen vormen een van de meest geschikte middelen om de Europese burger het gevoel te geven dat hij in onze Europese Unie in een gemeenschap leeft. Daarom is een van deze symbolen, namelijk het logo van de Unie op autonummerborden, een van de elementen die het meest hebben bijgedragen tot de verbreiding van de Europese gedachte. Nog niet alle landen hebben evenwel het nieuwe geharmoniseerde nummerbord ingevoerd, hetgeen tot gevolg heeft dat er bij de burgers die dat logo nog steeds niet op hun nummerbord hebben staan, sprake is van een zekere teleurstelling. Kan de Commissie mededelen of zij van mening is dat moet worden bevorderd dat landen die het geharmoniseerde nummerbord met het communautaire logo nog niet hebben ingevoerd, daartoe op zo kort mogelijke termijn overgaan? Antwoord van de heer Kinnock namens de Commissie (19 december 1997) De Commissie verwijst het geachte Parlementslid naar haar antwoord op zijn schriftelijke vraag E-2574/92 (1). Sedertdien hebben, naast Ierland en Portugal, ook Duitsland en Frankrijk het communautaire nummerbord ingevoerd. (1) PB C 86 van 26. 3. 1993. (98/C 187/30) SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG E-3550/97 van Giuseppe Rauti (NI) aan de Commissie (12 november 1997) Betreft: Afschaffing van het aardrijkskunde-onderwijs in Italie¤ In het (cid:132)proefproject(cid:148) van het Italiaanse Ministerie van Onderwijs dat reeds op 150 scholen en wel tijdens de eerste twee jaar van het middelbaar onderwijs wordt uitgevoerd komt het aardrijkskunde-onderwijs niet voor, ondanks een groot aantal negatieve gevolgen voor het beroep, omdat vele leraren aardrijkskunde gedwongen zijn (cid:132)op te geven(cid:148). Kan de Commissie derhalve mededelen: 1. of zij niet vindt dat deze weglating het niveau en de kwaliteit van het onderwijs ernstig (cid:132)verarmt(cid:148), 2. of het besluit van het Italiaanse ministerie niet in strijd is met de positieve mening die op alle soortgelijke onderwijsinstellingn in de Europese Unie wordt aangehangen over de aardrijkskunde en de culturele waarde ervan, of zij bij de Italiaanse regering geen stappen wil ondernemen om dit ernstige en ontstellende besluit te 3. herroepen? (98/C 187/31) SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG E-3802/97 van Cristiana Muscardini (NI) aan de Commissie (26 november 1997) Betreft: Het afvoeren van aardrijkskunde van de leerprogramma(cid:146)s in Italie¤ De Italiaanse minister van Onderwijs heeft zijn voornemen aangekondigd aardrijkskunde af te voeren van de leerprogramma(cid:146)s van middelbare scholen. Op 150 scholen is men dit jaar al bezig met een experiment dat vooruitloopt op het afschaffen van aardrijkskunde. Op sommige onderwijsinstellingen voor technisch en beroepsonderwijs is het vak de afgelopen jaren al (cid:132)geruisloos(cid:148) van het programma afgevoerd


title: QUESTION ECRITE no 3785/97 de Christof TANNERT à la Commission. Aides communautaires au Land de Berlin en 1996

eurovoc_concepts:
Berlin
EU aid
EU environmental policy
EU programme
EU research policy
European Regional Development Fund
European Social Fund
energy policy

text: 8. 6. 98 FR Journal officiel des Communaute·s europe·ennes C 174/129 En raison du montant plus e·leve· de la restitution pour les animaux reproducteurs de race pure tels les ge·nisses et les vaches par rapport a‘ la restitution pre·vue pour les autres animaux femelles vivants, il est ne·cessaire de s(cid:146)assurer par des mesures de contro(cid:136)le que les animaux exporte·s ne seront pas abattus imme·diatement de‘s leur arrive·e dans les pays tiers de destination. 3. L(cid:146)accord de l(cid:146)OMC offre la possibilite· de diffe·rencier le montant de la restitution. Celui-ci est plus e·leve· pour les animaux reproducteurs de race pure que pour les bovins de boucherie. Par conse·quent, il n(cid:146)y a pas de raison de demander un changement des re‘gles lors du prochain cycle de ne·gociations commerciales. (1) JO L 227 du 11. 8. 1992. (98/C 174/194) QUESTION E· CRITE E-3784/97 pose·e par Carlos Pimenta (PPE) a‘ la Commission (26 novembre 1997) Objet: Mise en (cid:156)uvre de la proposition 97/C207/11 du Conseil relative a‘ un accord entre la Communaute· europe·enne, le Canada et la Fe·de·ration de Russie sur des normes internationales de pie·geage sans cruaute· Si, comme le souhaite la Commission, le Conseil rejetait l(cid:146)avis du Parlement europe·en et de·cidait, par son vote, de conclure l(cid:146)accord pre·vu avec le Canada et la Fe·de·ration de Russie, comment la Commission propose-t-elle que les dispositions de cet accord soient mises en (cid:156)uvre dans l(cid:146)Union europe·enne? En particulier, la Commission envisage-t-elle de pre·senter une proposition, soit de directive, soit de re‘glement, et, dans l(cid:146)affirmative, quelle sera la base juridique de sa proposition? Re·ponse donne·e par Sir Leon Brittan au nom de la Commission (21 janvier 1998) La Commission souhaite rappeler a‘ l(cid:146)Honorable Parlementaire que l(cid:146)accord sur des normes internationales de pie·geage sans cruaute· entre la Communaute·, le Canada et la Fe·de·ration de Russie n(cid:146)a pas encore e·te· ratifie·. Me(cid:136)me si la re·flexion est de·ja‘ en cours, la Commission ne pourra se prononcer formellement sur ces questions qu(cid:146)apre‘s la conclusion formelle de l(cid:146)accord par le Conseil. Le Parlement sera informe· par les proce·dures normales si une proposition e·ventuelle de transposition de cet accord e·tait adopte·e par la Commission. (98/C 174/195) QUESTION E· CRITE E-3785/97 pose·e par Christof Tannert (PSE) a‘ la Commission (26 novembre 1997) Objet: Aides communautaires au Land de Berlin en 1996 Quels montants, au titre des aides communautaires en faveur du Land de Berlin, ont e·te· approuve·s et liquide·s en 1996, pour quelles actions et dans le cadre de quels programmes? 1. A‘ charge du Fonds re·gional (FEDER)? 2. A‘ charge du Fonds social europe·en (FSE)? 3. A‘ charge des programmes communautaires de recherche? 4. A‘ charge des programmes communautaires dans le secteur de l(cid:146)e·nergie? 5. A‘ charge des programmes communautaires dans le secteur de l(cid:146)environnement? 6. A‘ charge d(cid:146)autres programmes communautaires?


title: KOMISSION ASETUS (EY) N:o 2343/97, annettu 26 päivänä marraskuuta 1997, oliiviöljyn vientitukien vahvistamisesta


title: 97/812/ΕΚ: Απόφαση της Επιτροπής της 26ης Νοεμβρίου 1997 για την άρση της καταβολής δασμού αντιντάμπινγκ που έχει επεκταθεί σε ορισμένα εξαρτήματα ποδηλάτων καταγωγής Λαϊκής Δημοκρατίας της Κίνας σύμφωνα με τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 88/97

eurovoc_concepts:
China
anti-dumping duty
import
spare part
tariff exemption
two-wheeled vehicle


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3795/97 by José GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL to the Commission. French road blockades: speeding up compensation

eurovoc_concepts:
France
civil liability proceedings
damage
free movement of goods
indemnification
labour dispute
legal system
road transport
strike

text: C 187/56 FI Euroopan yhteiso¤jen virallinen lehti 16. 6. 98 Ta¤ha¤n mennessa¤ Ranskan viranomaiset eiva¤t ole puuttuneet lakkoon ranskalaisten rekka-autonkuljettajien toteuttamien tiesulkujen lopettamiseksi. Tiesulkuihin liittyy usein hyo¤kka¤yksia¤ Espanjasta hedelmia¤ ja vihanneksia kuljettavia rekka-autoja vastaan. Mutta Ranskan viranomaiset ovat kuitenkin luvanneet, etta¤ vahinkoa ka¤rsineille maksetaan korvauksia. Ta¤sta¤ lupauksesta huolimatta brittien, espanjalaisten, saksalaisten, portugalilaisten ja belgialaisten syyskuuhun 1997 mennessa¤ esitta¤mista¤ 2 749 korvausvaatimuksesta on ka¤sitelty vain 737 (26,8 %), joista 124 on saanut myo¤nteisen pa¤a¤to¤ksen (4,51 %). Espanjan kansalaisten Ranskan tuomioistuimissa esitta¤ma¤sta¤ 500 vaatimuksesta vain yksi on saanut myo¤nteisen pa¤a¤to¤ksen. Ranskan viranomaiset puolustelevat ta¤ta¤ oikeuden pa¤a¤to¤sten hitautta silla¤, etta¤ maan oikeusja¤rjestyksen mukaan tuomioistuin voi myo¤nta¤a¤ korvauksia vain niissa¤ tapauksissa, joissa voidaan esitta¤a¤ kirjallisia todisteita autoille tai kuormille aiheutetuista vahingoista. Na¤ita¤ todisteita ei ole helppo koota. Na¤in ollen ei ole todellista mahdollisuutta arvioida niita¤ suuria kustannuksia, jotka kuljetusten esta¤minen rajoilla aiheuttaa, vaikka niihin ei olekaan liittynyt fyysista¤ va¤kivaltaa. Aikooko komissio ka¤ynnista¤a¤ arviointija¤rjestelma¤n, joka mahdollistaisi aiheutettujen vahinkojen puolueettoman arvioimisen ja sen, etta¤ vahinkoa ka¤rsineet saisivat korvauksensa viipyma¤tta¤? (98/C 187/88) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-3794/97 komissiolle esitta¤ja¤(t): Jose· Garc(cid:14)·a-Margallo y Marfil (PPE) (26. marraskuuta 1997) Aihe: Ranskan tiesulut: vahinkojen arviointi Ranskalaisten rekka-autonkuljettajien toteuttamat tiesulut alkavat olla toistuva ilmio¤, joka on vastoin yhteiso¤n ma¤a¤ra¤yksia¤ vapaasta kilpailusta, silla¤ se esta¤a¤ tavaroiden vapaan liikkumisen Euroopan unionissa. Euroopan sisa¤iselle kaupalle aiheutetut vahingot ovat eritta¤in suuria, minka¤ vuoksi jotkut maat kuten Espanja, Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta, Saksa ja Alankomaat ovat valittaneet asiasta. Espanjalaiset kuljetusalan ja¤rjesto¤t arvioivat, etta¤ jokainen tiesulkupa¤iva¤ maksaa alan yrityksille yli 2,5 miljardia pesetaa. Ta¤ha¤n mennessa¤ Ranskan viranomaiset eiva¤t ole puuttuneet lakkoon ranskalaisten rekka-autonkuljettajien toteuttamien tiesulkujen lopettamiseksi. Tiesulkuihin liittyy usein hyo¤kka¤yksia¤ Espanjasta hedelmia¤ ja vihanneksia kuljettavia rekka-autoja vastaan. Mutta Ranskan viranomaiset ovat kuitenkin luvanneet, etta¤ vahinkoa ka¤rsineille maksetaan korvauksia. Ta¤sta¤ lupauksesta huolimatta brittien, espanjalaisten, saksalaisten, portugalilaisten ja belgialaisten syyskuuhun 1997 mennessa¤ esitta¤mista¤ 2 749 korvausvaatimuksesta on ka¤sitelty vain 737 (26,8 %), joista 124 on saanut myo¤nteisen pa¤a¤to¤ksen (4,51 %). Espanjan kansalaisten Ranskan tuomioistuimissa esitta¤ma¤sta¤ 500 vaatimuksesta vain yksi on saanut myo¤nteisen pa¤a¤to¤ksen. Ranskan viranomaiset puolustelevat ta¤ta¤ oikeuden pa¤a¤to¤sten hitautta silla¤, etta¤ maan oikeusja¤rjestyksen mukaan tuomioistuin voi myo¤nta¤a¤ korvauksia vain niissa¤ tapauksissa, joissa voidaan esitta¤a¤ kirjallisia todisteita autoille tai kuormille aiheutetuista vahingoista. Na¤ita¤ todisteita ei ole helppo koota. Na¤in ollen ei ole todellista mahdollisuutta arvioida niita¤ suuria kustannuksia, jotka kuljetusten esta¤minen rajoilla aiheuttaa, vaikka niihin ei olekaan liittynyt fyysista¤ va¤kivaltaa. Onko komissio aikonut toteuttaa perinpohjaisen selvityksen kustannuksista, joita na¤ma¤ tiesulut aiheuttavat Euroopan talouksille? (98/C 187/89) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-3795/97 komissiolle esitta¤ja¤(t): Jose· Garc(cid:14)·a-Margallo y Marfil (PPE) (26. marraskuuta 1997) Aihe: Ranskan tiesulut: korvausten kiirehtiminen Ranskalaisten rekka-autonkuljettajien toteuttamat tiesulut alkavat olla toistuva ilmio¤, joka on vastoin yhteiso¤n ma¤a¤ra¤yksia¤ vapaasta kilpailusta, silla¤ se esta¤a¤ tavaroiden vapaan liikkumisen Euroopan unionissa. Euroopan sisa¤iselle kaupalle aiheutetut vahingot ovat eritta¤in suuria, minka¤ vuoksi jotkut maat kuten Espanja, Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta, Saksa ja Alankomaat ovat valittaneet asiasta. Espanjalaiset kuljetusalan ja¤rjesto¤t arvioivat, etta¤ jokainen tiesulkupa¤iva¤ maksaa alan yrityksille yli 2,5 miljardia pesetaa