title: Commission Regulation (EC) No 2509/97 of 15 December 1997 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff

eurovoc_concepts:
alcoholic beverage
common customs tariff
tariff nomenclature

formats: html pdfa1b print


title: QUESTION ECRITE no 3948/97 de Johannes SWOBODA au Conseil. Initiative visant la résolution du problème du Kosovo

eurovoc_concepts:
Kosovo
arms limitation
diplomatic relations
international sanctions
international security
peacekeeping
terrorism
the EU's international role

formats: html pdf print

text: 22. 6. 98 FR Journal officiel des Communaute·s europe·ennes C 196/41 (98/C 196/57) QUESTION E· CRITE E-3948/97 pose·e par Johannes Swoboda (PSE) au Conseil (15 de·cembre 1997) Objet: Initiative visant la re·solution du proble‘me du Kosovo La France et l(cid:146)Allemagne ont lance· une initiative visant a‘ re·soudre le proble‘me du Kosovo. Dans quelle mesure cette initiative a-t-elle fait l(cid:146)objet d(cid:146)une concertation avec le Conseil et comment les diffe·rentes parties concerne·es ont-elles re·agi? Re·ponse (7 avril 1998) 1. La France et l(cid:146)Allemagne ont informe· le Conseil de leur initiative, en joignant la lettre qu(cid:146)elles ont envoye·e au Pre·sident Milosevic, a‘ la suite de consultations avec les autres membres de l(cid:146)Union europe·enne et du Groupe de contact. Dans leur lettre, ces deux E· tats pre·cisaient qu(cid:146)il fallait voir dans leur initiative une de·marche visant a‘ trouver une solution aux proble‘mes du Kosovo et a‘ mettre un terme a‘ l(cid:146)isolement international de la Re·publique fe·de·rale de Yougoslavie, et ce dans l(cid:146)inte·re(cid:136)t de la stabilite· tant de la re·gion que de l(cid:146)Europe. Malheureusement, comme nombre d(cid:146)autres initiatives prises par la communaute· internationale, celle-ci ne semble pas avoir trouve· d(cid:146)e·cho pour l(cid:146)instant. 2. Pour sa part, le Conseil suit de pre‘s la situation au Kosovo. Son Pre·sident a fait une de·claration a‘ ce sujet devant le Parlement lors de la session ple·nie‘re du 11 mars 1998 et ne manquera pas d(cid:146)informer le Parlement dans les enceintes approprie·es de l(cid:146)e·volution de cette situation. Le Conseil a re·cemment adopte· une se·rie de mesures destine·es a‘ exercer une pression sur Belgrade pour 3. trouver un re‘glement pacifique au proble‘me du Kosovo. Ces mesures comprennent un embargo sur les armes, le refus de fournir du mate·riel susceptible d(cid:146)e(cid:136)tre utilise· a‘ des fins de re·pression interne ou de terrorisme, un moratoire sur les cre·dits a‘ l(cid:146)exportation et l(cid:146)interdiction de de·livrer des visas a‘ un certain nombre de personnalite·s serbes ayant des attributions bien de·finies en matie‘re de se·curite· au Kosovo. Cette de·cision, prise a‘ la suite des discussions des Ministres des Affaires e·trange‘res du 13 mars dernier, montre que l(cid:146)Union europe·enne prend tre‘s au se·rieux les re·cents e·ve·nements qui se sont produits au Kosovo. L(cid:146)Union europe·enne a l(cid:146)intention de maintenir la pression sur les autorite·s de Belgrade pour les amener a‘ engager un dialogue ve·ritable sans conditions pre·alables. Elle attend des autorite·s de Belgrade et des dirigeants de la communaute· de souche albanaise du Kosovo qu(cid:146)ils assument leurs responsabilite·s car l(cid:146)inte·re(cid:136)t de la Re·publique fe·de·rale de Yougoslavie, y compris le Kosovo, et la stabilite· de la re·gion en de·pendent. (98/C 196/58) QUESTION E· CRITE E-3959/97 pose·e par Johanna Maij-Weggen (PPE) a‘ la Commission (12 de·cembre 1997) Objet: Politique de·mographique de la Chine La Commission a-t-elle connaissance des informations faisant e·tat d(cid:146)une ste·rilisation obligatoire a‘ grande e·chelle qui aurait eu lieu au Tibet entre septembre et octobre 1996 (suivant le bulletin d(cid:146)information TSG des Pays-Bas)? Sait-elle que les autorite·s chinoises appliquent un syste‘me de tirage au sort obligatoire pour de·terminer quels couples peuvent encore avoir des enfants? Partage-t-elle la conclusion selon laquelle la politique de·mographique chinoise vise a‘ re·duire le nombre des Tibe·tains? Est-elle dispose·e a‘ protester a‘ ce sujet aupre‘s des autorite·s chinoises? Est-elle dispose·e a‘ soulever cette question a‘ la commission des droits de l(cid:146)homme des Nations unies? Peut-elle indiquer quelles de·marches elle a de·ja‘ effectue·es aupre‘s de la Chine au sujet de la politique de·mographique de ce pays?


title: Κανονισμός (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2508/97 της Επιτροπής της 15ης Δεκεμβρίου 1997 για τη θέσπιση των λεπτομερειών εφαρμογής στον τομέα του γάλακτος και των γαλακτοκομικών προϊόντων, των καθεστώτων που προβλέπονται στις ευρωπαϊκές συμφωνίες μεταξύ της Κοινότητας και της Δημοκρατίας της Ουγγαρίας, της Δημοκρατίας της Πολωνίας, της Τσεχικής Δημοκρατίας, της Δημοκρατίας της Σλοβακίας, της Βουλγαρίας και της Ρουμανίας, του καθεστώτος που προβλέπεται στις συμφωνίες για την απελευθέρωση των συναλλαγών μεταξύ της Κοινότητας και των Βαλτικών χωρών και του καθεστώτος που προβλέπεται στην προσωρινή συμφωνία μεταξύ της Κοινότητας και της Σλοβενίας, καθώς και την κατάργηση των κανονισμών (ΕΟΚ) αριθ. 584/92, (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1588/94, (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1713/95 και (ΕΚ) αριθ. 455/97

eurovoc_concepts:
Central and Eastern Europe
agreement (EU)
liberalisation of trade
milk
milk product


title: Regolamento (CE) n. 2507/97 della Commissione del 15 dicembre 1997 che modifica il regolamento (CEE) n. 689/92 che stabilisce le procedure e le condizioni di presa in consegna dei cereali da parte degli organismi d'intervento

eurovoc_concepts:
analytical chemistry
cereals
intervention agency
weights and measures


title: 1997 m. gruodžio 15 d. EEE jungtinio komiteto sprendimas Nr. 101/97, iš dalies keičiantis EEE susitarimo II priedą (Techniniai reglamentai, standartai, bandymai ir sertifikavimas)

eurovoc_concepts:
European Economic Area
agreement (EU)
derogation from EU law
flavoured wine
fruit product
labelling

text: 11/3 t. LT Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys 73 21998D0709(18) 1998 7 9 EUROPOS BENDRIJŲ OFICIALUSIS LEIDINYS L 193/61 EEE JUNGTINIO KOMITETO SPRENDIMAS Nr. 101/97 1997 m. gruodžio 15 d. iš dalies keičiantis EEE susitarimo II priedą (Techniniai reglamentai, standartai, bandymai ir sertifikavimas) EEE JUNGTINIS KOMITETAS, atsižvelgdamas į Europos ekonominės erdvės susitarimą, patikslintą Protokolu, patikslinančiu Europos eko- nominės erdvės susitarimą, toliau — Susitarimas, ypač į jo 98 straipsnį, kadangi Susitarimo II priedas buvo iš dalies pakeistas 1997 m. liepos 10 d. EEE jungtinio komiteto spren- dimu Nr. 48/97 (1), kadangi 1996 m. lapkričio 20 d. Komisijos reglamentas (EB) Nr. 2215/96, nustatantis priemones, leidžian- čias nukrypti dėl „Glühwein“ (2), turi būti įtrauktas į Susitarimą, NUSPRENDĖ: 1 straipsnis Susitarimo II priedo XXVII skyriuje po 6 punkto (Komisijos reglamentas (EB) Nr. 2009/92) įterpiamas toks punktas: „7. 396 R 2215: 1996 m. lapkričio 20 d. Tarybos reglamentu (EB) Nr. 2215/96, nustatančiu priemo- nes, leidžiančias nukrypti dėl „Glühwein“ (OL L 296, 1996 11 21, p. 30). “. 2 straipsnis Komisijos reglamento (EB) Nr. 2215/96 tekstai sprendimo teksto atitinkamomis kalbomis, yra autentiški. islandų ir norvegų kalbomis, kurie pridedami prie šio Šis sprendimas įsigalioja 1997 m. gruodžio 16 d. , jei EEE jungtiniam komitetui buvo pateikti visi praneši- mai pagal Susitarimo 103 straipsnio 1 dalį. 3 straipsnis Šis sprendimas skelbiamas Europos Bendrijų oficialiojo leidinio EEE dalyje ir EEE priede. 4 straipsnis Priimta Briuselyje, 1997 m. gruodžio 15 d. EEE jungtinio komiteto vardu Pirmininkas E. BULL (1) OL L 290, 1997 10 23, p. 34. (2) OL L 296, 1996 11 21, p. 30


title: REGLAMENTO (CE) N° 2501/97 DE LA COMISIÓN de 15 de diciembre de 1997 por el que se establece una excepción temporal al Reglamento (CE) n° 1445/95 por el que se establecen las disposiciones de aplicación del régimen de importación y exportación en el sector de la carne de vacuno

eurovoc_concepts:
beef
export licence
import licence


title: SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE Nr. 4053/97 von Phillip WHITEHEAD an die Kommission. Einfuhr von gefährlichen chinesischen Feuerwerkskörpern

eurovoc_concepts:
China
accident prevention
consumer protection
dangerous substance
explosive
import restriction
product safety
public awareness campaign

formats: html print


title: Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2575/97 der Kommission vom 15. Dezember 1997 zur Festsetzung des Pauschalprämiensatzes für bestimmte Fischereierzeugnisse während des Wirtschaftsjahres 1998 (Text von Bedeutung für den EWR)

eurovoc_concepts:
fishery product
market intervention
storage premium


title: Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 on common rules for the development of the internal market of Community postal services and the improvement of quality of service

eurovoc_concepts:
harmonisation of standards
postal service
provision of services
quality standard
single market

text: L 15/14 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities 21. 1. 98 DIRECTIVE 97/67/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on common rules for the development of the internal market of Community postal services and the improvement of quality of service of 15 December 1997 THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, in that postal services are an essential instrument of communication and trade; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 57 (2), 66 and 100a thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1), Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (2), Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions (3), Having regard to the resolution of the European Par- liament of 22 January 1993 concerning the green paper on the development of the single market for postal ser- vices (4), Having regard to the Council resolution of 7 February 1994 on the development of Community postal ser- vices (5), Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 189b of the Treaty, in the light of the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee on 7 November 1997 (6), (1) Whereas measures should be adopted with the aim of establishing the internal market in accordance with Article 7a of the Treaty; whereas this market frontiers in comprises an area without which the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital is ensured; internal (2) Whereas the establishment of the internal market in the postal sector is of proven importance for the economic and social cohesion of the Community, (1) OJ C 322, 2. 12. 1995, p. 22, and OJ C 300, 10. 10. 1996, p. 22. (2) OJ C 174, 17. 6. 1996, p. 41. (3) OJ C 337, 11. 11. 1996, p. 28. (4) OJ C 42, 15. 2. 1993, p. 240. (5) OJ C 48, 16. 2. 1994, p. 3. (6) Opinion of the European Parliament of 9 May 1996 (OJ C 152, 27. 5. 1996, p. 20), Council Common Position of 29 April 1997 (OJ C 188, 19. 6. 1997, p. 9) and Decision of the Euro- pean Parliament of 16 September 1997 (OJ C 304, 6. 10. 1997, p. 34); Decision of the European Parliament of 19 November 1997 and Decision of the Council of 1 December 1997. (3) Whereas on 11 June 1992 the Commission presented a Green Paper on the development of the single market for postal services and, on 2 June 1993, a Communication on the guidelines for the development of Community postal services; (4) Whereas the Commission has conducted wide- ranging public consultation on those aspects of postal services that are of interest to the Com- munity and the interested parties in the postal sector have communicated their observations to the Commission; (5) Whereas the current extent of the universal postal service and the conditions governing its provision vary significantly from one Member State to another; whereas, in particular, performance in terms of quality of services is very unequal amongst Member States; (6) Whereas cross-border postal links do not always meet the expectations of users and European citizens, and performance, in terms of quality of service with regard to Community cross-border postal services, is at the moment unsatisfactory; for (7) Whereas the disparities observed in the postal sector have considerable implications those sectors of activity which rely especially on postal services the progress towards internal Community cohesion, in that the regions deprived of postal services of sufficiently high quality find themselves at a disadvantage as regards both their letter service and the distribution of goods; and effectively impede (8) Whereas measures seeking to ensure the gradual and controlled liberalisation of the market and to secure a proper balance in the application thereof are necessary in order to guarantee, throughout the to the obligations and Community, and subject rights of the universal service providers, the free provision of services in the postal sector itself; (9) Whereas action at Community level to ensure greater harmonisation of the conditions governing the postal sector is therefore necessary and steps must consequently be taken to establish common rules; 21. 1. 98 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities L 15/15 (10) Whereas, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, a set of general principles should be adopted at Community level, whilst the choice of the exact procedures should be a matter for the Member States, which should be free to choose the system best adapted to their own circumstances; (11) Whereas it is essential to guarantee at Community level a universal postal service encompassing a minimum range of services of specified quality to be provided in all Member States at an affordable irrespective of price for the benefit of all users, their geographical location in the Community; (12) Whereas the aim of the universal services is to offer all users easy access to the postal network through the provision, in particular, of a sufficient number of access points and by ensuring satisfactory condi- tions with regard to the frequency of collections the and deliveries; whereas universal service must meet the fundamental need to ensure continuity of operation, whilst at the same time remaining adaptable to the needs of users as well as guaranteeing them fair and non-dis- criminatory treatment; the provision of (13) Whereas universal service must cover national services as well as cross-border services; (14) Whereas users of the universal service must be given adequate information on the range of services offered, the conditions governing their supply and use, the quality of the services provided, and the tariffs; (15) Whereas the provisions of this Directive relating to universal service provision are without prejudice to the right of universal service operators to negotiate contracts with customers individually; (16) Whereas the maintenance of a range of those services that may be reserved, in compliance with the rules of the Treaty and without prejudice to the application of the rules on competition, appears justified on the grounds of ensuring the operation of the universal service under financially balanced conditions; whereas the process of liberalisation should not curtail the continuing supply of certain free services for blind and partially sighted persons introduced by the Member States; (17) Whereas items of correspondence weighing 350 grammes and over represent less than 2 % of letter volume and less than 3 % of the receipts of the public operators; whereas the criteria of price (five times the basic tariff) will better permit the distinc- tion between the reserved service and the express service, which is liberalised; (18) Whereas, in view of the fact that the essential dif- ference between express mail and universal postal services lies in the value added (whatever form it takes) provided by express services and perceived by customers, the most effective way of deter- mining the extra value perceived is to consider the extra price that customers are prepared to pay, without prejudice, however, to the price limit of the reserved area which must be respected; for direct mail and cross-border mail (19) Whereas it is reasonable to allow, on an interim basis, to continue to be capable of reservation within the limits provided; whereas, as a price and weight further step towards the completion of the internal market of postal services, a decision on the further gradual the postal market, in particular with a view to the liberalisa- tion of cross-border and direct mail as well as on a further limits, should be taken by the European Parliament and the Council not later than 1 January 2000, on a proposal from the Commission following a review of the sector; controlled liberalisation of the price and weight review of (20) Whereas, for reasons of public order and public security, Member States may have a legitimate interest in conferring on one or more entities designated by them the right to site on the public highway letter-boxes intended for the reception of postal items; whereas, for the same reasons, they are entitled to appoint the entity or entities responsible for issuing postage stamps identifying the country of origin and those responsible for providing the registered mail service used in the course of judicial or administrative procedures in accordance with their national legislation; whereas they may also indicate membership of the European Union by integrating the 12-star symbol; (21) Whereas new services (services quite distinct from conventional services) and document exchange do not form part of the universal service and con- sequently there is no justification for their being reserved to the universal service providers; whereas this applies equally to self-provision (provision of postal services by the natural or legal person who is the originator of the mail, or collection and routing of these items by a third party acting solely on behalf of that person), which does not fall within the category of services; L 15/16 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities 21. 1. 98 (22) Whereas Member States should be able to regulate, by appropriate authorization procedures, on their territory, the provision of postal services which are reserved to the universal service providers; not whereas those procedures must be transparent, non-discriminatory, proportionate and based on objective criteria; an unfair (23) Whereas the Member States should have the option of making the grant of licences subject to universal service obligations or contributions to a compensa- tion fund intended to compensate the universal service provider for the provision of services repre- senting financial burden; whereas Member States should be able to include in the authorisations an obligation that the authorised activities must not infringe the exclusive or special rights granted to the universal service providers for the reserved services; whereas an identification system for direct mail may be introduced for the purposes of supervision where direct mail is liber- alised; (24) Whereas measures necessary for the harmonisation laid down by the of authorisation procedures Member States governing the commercial provision to the public of non-reserved services will have to be adopted; (25) Whereas, should this prove necessary, measures shall be adopted to ensure the transparency and non-discriminatory nature of conditions governing access to the public postal network in Member States; (26) Whereas, in order to ensure sound management of the universal service and to avoid distortions of competition, the tariffs applied to the universal service should be objective, transparent, non-dis- criminatory and geared to costs; (27) Whereas the remuneration for the provision of the intra-Community cross-border mail service, without prejudice to the minimum set of obligations derived from Universal Postal Union acts, should be geared to cover the costs of delivery incurred by the universal service provider in the country of destination; whereas this remuneration should also provide an incentive to improve or maintain the quality of the cross-border service through the use of quality-of-service targets; whereas this would justify suitable systems providing for an appropriate coverage of costs and related specifically to the quality of service achieved; (28) Whereas the different accounts reserved services and non-reserved services are separate for necessary in order to introduce transparency into the actual costs of the various services and in order to ensure that cross-subsidies from the reserved sector to the non-reserved sector do not adversely affect the competitive conditions in the latter; service providers (29) Whereas, in order to ensure the application of the principles set out in the previous three recitals, universal should implement, within a reasonable time limit, cost accounting systems, which can be independently verified, by which costs can be allocated to services as accur- ately as possible on the basis of transparent pro- cedures; whereas can be fulfilled, for example, by implementation of the principle of fully distributed costing; whereas such cost accounting systems may not be required in circumstances where genuine conditions of open competition exist; such requirements (30) Whereas consideration should be given to the interests of users, who are entitled to services of a high quality; whereas, therefore, every effort must be made to improve and enhance the quality of services provided at Community level; whereas in quality require Member such improvements to be attained or States to lay down standards, surpassed by the universal service providers, in respect of the services forming part of the universal service; aspect of an essential (31) Whereas the quality of service expected by users the sevices constitutes provided; whereas the evaluation standards for this quality of service and the levels of quality achieved must be published in the interests of users; whereas it is necessary to have available harmonised quality- of-service standards and a common methodology for measurement in order to be able to evaluate the convergence of the quality of service throughout the Community; (32) Whereas national quality standards consistent with Community standards must be determined by intra- Member States; whereas, Community cross-border requiring the combined efforts of at least two universal service providers from two different Member States, quality standards must be defined at Community level; in the case of services (33) Whereas compliance with these standards must be independently verified at regular intervals and on a harmonised basis; whereas users must have the right to be informed of the results of this verifica- tion and Member States that should ensure corrective action is taken where those results demonstrate that the standards are not being met; 21. 1. 98 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities L 15/17 (34) Whereas Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (1) applies to postal operators; (35) Whereas the need for improvement of quality of service means that disputes have to be settled quickly and efficiently; whereas, in addition to the forms of legal redress available under national and Community dealing with complaints should be provided, which should be transparent, simple and inexpensive and should enable all relevant parties to participate; procedure law, a (36) Whereas progress in the interconnection of postal networks and the interests of users require that technical standardisation be encouraged; whereas technical standardisation is indispensable for the promotion of interoperability between national networks and for an efficient Community universal service; (37) Whereas guidelines on European harmonisation standardisation the European specialised technical entrusted to provide for activities Committee for Standardisation; to be (38) Whereas a committee should be established to assist the Commission with the implementation of this Directive, particularly in relation to the future work on the development of measures relating to the quality of Community cross-border service and technical standardisation; (39) Whereas, in order to ensure the proper functioning of the universal service and to ensure undistorted competition in the non-reserved sector, it is im- portant to separate the functions of the regulator, on the one hand, and the operator, on the other; whereas no postal operator may be both judge and interested party; whereas it is for the Member State to define the statute of one or more national regu- latory authorities, which may be chosen from public entities authorities appointed for that purpose; independent or therefore, (40) Whereas the effects of the harmonised conditions on the functioning of the internal market in postal services will need to be the subject of an assess- ment; whereas, the Commission will present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Directive, including the appropriate information on develop- ments concerning economic, social, employment and technological aspects, as well as on quality of service, three years following the date of its entry into force, and in any event no later than 31 December 2000; sector, particularly in the (1) OJ L 95, 21. 4. 1993, p. 29. (41) Whereas this Directive does not affect the applica- tion of the rules of the Treaty, and in particular its rules on competition and the freedom to provide services; (42) Whereas nothing shall prevent Member States from maintaining in force or introducing measures for the postal sector which are more liberal than those provided for by this Directive, nor, should this Directive lapse, from maintaining in force measures which they have introduced in order to implement it, provided in each case that such measures are compatible with the Treaty; (43) Whereas it is appropriate that this Directive should apply until 31 December 2004 unless otherwise decided by the European Parliament and the from the Council on the basis of a proposal Commission; (44) Whereas this Directive does not apply to any ac- tivity which falls outside the scope of Community law, such as those provided for by Titles V and VI of the Treaty on European Union, and in any case to activities concerning public security, defence, State security (including the economic well-being of the State when the activities relate to State se- curity matters) and the activities of the State in areas of criminal law; (45) Whereas this Directive does not, in the case of undertakings which are not established in the Community, prevent the adoption of measures in accordance with both Community law and existing international obligations designed to ensure that nationals of the Member States enjoy similar treat- in third countries; whereas Community ment undertakings should benefit in third countries from treatment and effective access that is comparable to the treatment and access to the market which is conferred on nationals of the countries concerned within the Community context, HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: CHAPTER 1 Objective and scope Article 1 This Directive establishes common rules concerning: — the provision of a universal postal service within the Community, — the criteria defining the services which may be reserved for universal service providers and the condi- tions governing the provision of non-reserved services, L 15/18 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities 21. 1. 98 — tariff principles and transparency of accounts for universal service provision, — the setting of quality standards for universal service provision and the setting-up of a system to ensure compliance with those standards, — the harmonisation of technical standards, — the creation of independent national regulatory au- thorities. Article 2 For the purposes of this Directive, the following defini- tions shall apply: 1. postal services: services involving the clearance, sorting, transport and delivery of postal items; 2. public postal network: the system of organisation and resources of all kinds used by the universal service provider(s) for the purposes in particular of: for 8. direct mail: a communication consisting solely of advertising, marketing or publicity material and comprising an identical message, except the addressee’s name, address and identifying number as well as other modifications which do not alter the nature of the message, which is sent to a significant number of addressees, to be conveyed and delivered at the address indicated by the sender on the item itself or on its wrapping. The national regulatory authority shall interpret the term ‘significant number of addressees’ within each Member State and shall publish an appropriate defintion. Bills, invoices, financial statements and other non-identical messages shall not be regarded as direct mail. A communica- tion combining direct mail with other items within the same wrapping shall not be regarded as direct mail. Direct mail shall include cross-border as well as domestic direct mail; a 9. registered item: service providing a flat-rate guarantee against risks of loss, theft or damage and appropriate upon supplying request, with proof of the handing in of the postal item and/or of its delivery to the addressee; sender, where the — the clearance of postal items covered by a universal service obligation from access points throughout the territory, 10. insured item: a service insuring the postal item up to the value declared by the sender in the event of loss, theft or damage; — the routing and handling of those items from the postal network access point to the distribution centre, — distribution to the addresses shown on items; 3. access points: physical facilities, including letter boxes provided for the public either on the public highway or at the premises of the universal service provider, where postal items may be deposited with the public postal network by customers; 4. clearance: the operation of collecting postal items deposited at access points; 5. distribution: the process from sorting at the distribu- tion centre to delivery of postal items to their addres- sees; 6. postal item: an item addressed in the final form in which it is to be carried by the universal service provider. In addition to items of correspondence, such items also include for instance books, cata- logues, newspapers, periodicals and postal packages containing merchandise with or without commercial value; 7. item of correspondence: a communication in written form on any kind of physical medium to be conveyed and delivered at the address indicated by the sender on the item itself or on its wrapping. Books, cata- logues, newspapers and periodicals shall not be regarded as items of correspondence; 11. cross-border mail: mail from or to another Member State or from or to a third country; 12. document exchange: provision of means, including the supply of ad hoc premises as well as transporta- tion by a third party, allowing self-delivery by mutual exchange of postal items between users subscribing to this service; 13. universal service provider: the public or private entity providing a universal postal service or parts thereof within a Member State, the identity of which has been notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 4; 14. authorisations: means any permission setting out rights and obligations specific to the postal sector and allowing undertakings to provide postal services and, where applicable, to establish and/or operate postal networks for the provision of such services, in the form of ‘individual licence’ as defined below: authorisation’ or ‘general a — ‘general authorisation’ means an authorisation, regardless of whether it is regulated by a ‘class licence’ or under general law and regardless of whether such regulation requires registration or declaration procedures, which does not require the undertaking concerned to obtain an explicit decision by the national regulatory authority before exercising the rights stemming from the authorisation, 21. 1. 98 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities L 15/19 — ‘individual licence’ means an authorisation which is granted by a national regulatory authority and which gives an undertaking specific rights, or which subjects that undertaking’s operations to specific obligations supplementing the general authorisation where applicable, where the under- taking is not entitled to exercice the rights concerned until it has received the decision by the national regulatory authority; 15. terminal dues: the remuneration of universal service incoming cross- the distribution of items from another providers for border mail comprising postal Member State or from a third country; — one clearance, — one delivery to the home or premises of every natural or legal person or, by way of derogation, under condi- regulatory tions at authority, one delivery to appropriate installations. the discretion of the national Any exception or derogation granted by a national regula- tory authority in accordance with this paragraph must be communicated to the Commission and to all national regulatory authorities. 4. Each Member State shall adopt the measures neces- sary to ensure that the universal service includes the fol- lowing minimum facilities: 16. sender: a natural or legal person responsible for ori- ginating postal items; — the clearance, sorting, transport and distribution of postal items up to two kilograms, 17. users: any natural or legal person benefiting from an service provision as sender or a universal addressee; 18. national regulatory authority: the body or bodies, in each Member State, to which the Member State entrusts, inter alia, the regulatory functions falling within the scope of this Directive; 19. essential requirements: general non-economic reasons which can induce a Member State to impose condi- tions on the supply of postal services. These reasons are the confidentiality of correspondence, security of the network as regards the transport of dangerous goods and, where justified, data protection, environ- mental protection and regional planning. Data protection may include personal data protection, information transmitted or the confidentiality of stored and protection of privacy. CHAPTER 2 Universal service Article 3 1. Member States shall ensure that users enjoy the right to a universal service involving the permanent provision of a postal service of specified quality at all points in their territory at affordable prices for all users. 2. To this end, Member States shall take steps to ensure that the density of the points of contact and of the access points takes account of the needs of users. They shall take steps to ensure that the universal 3. service provider(s) guarantee(s) every working day and not less than five days a week, save in circumstances or geographical conditions deemed exceptional by the national regulatory authorities, as a miminum: — the clearance, sorting, transport and distribution of postal packages up to 10 kilograms, — services for registered items and insured items. 5. The national regulatory authorities may increase the weight limit of universal service coverage for postal pack- ages to any weight not exceeding 20 kilograms and may lay down special arrangements for the door-to-door de- livery of such packages. Notwithstanding the weight limit of universal service coverage for postal packages established by a given Member State, Member States shall ensure that postal and packages weighing up to 20 kilograms are delivered within their territories. received from other Member States The minimum and maximum dimensions for the 6. postal items in question shall be those laid down in the Convention and the Agreement concerning Postal Parcels adopted by the Universal Postal Union. The universal service as defined in this Article shall 7. cover both national and cross-border services. Article 4 Each Member State shall ensure that the provision of the universal service is guaranteed and shall notify the Commission of the steps it has taken to fulfil this obliga- tion and, in particular, the identity of its universal service provider(s). Each Member State shall determine in ac- cordance with Community law the obligations and rights assigned to the universal service provider(s) and shall publish them. Article 5 1. Each Member State shall take steps to ensure that universal service provision meets the following require- ments: — it shall offer a service guaranteeing compliance with the essential rerquirements, L 15/20 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities 21. 1. 98 — it shall offer an identical service to users under comparable conditions, continue to be reserved within the price and weight limits laid down in paragraph 1. — it shall be made available without any form of dis- crimination whatsoever, especially without discrimina- tion arising from political, religious or ideological considerations, — it shall not be interrupted or stopped except in cases of force majeure, — it shall evolve in response to the technical, economic and social environment and to the needs of users. The provisions of paragraph 1 shall not preclude 2. measures which the Member States take in accordance with requirements relating to public interest recognized by the Treaty, in particular Articles 36 and 56 thereof, concerning, inter alia, public morality, public security, including criminal invesigations, and public policy. Article 6 Member States shall take steps to ensure that users are regularly given sufficiently detailed and up-to-date infor- mation by the universal service provider(s) regarding the particular features of the universal services offered, with special reference to the general conditions of access to these services as well as to prices and quality standard levels. This information shall be published in an appro- priate manner. Member States shall notify the Commission, within 12 months of the date of entry into force of this Directive, how the information to be published in accordance with subparagraph is being made available. Any the first shall be notified to the subsequent modifications Commission at the earliest opportunity. CHAPTER 3 Harmonization of the services which may be reserved Article 7 1. To the extent necessary to ensure the maintenance of universal service, the services which may be reserved by each Member State for the universal service provider(s) shall be the clearance, sorting, transport and delivery of items of domestic correspondence, whether by accelerated delivery or not, the price of which is less than five times the public tariff for an item of correspondence in the first weight step of the fastest standard category where such category exists, provided that they weigh less than 350 grams. In the case of the free postal service for blind and partially sighted persons, exceptions to the weight and price restrictions may be permitted. 2. To the extent necessary to ensure the maintenance of universal service, cross-border mail and direct mail may As a further step towards the completion of the 3. internal market of postal services, the European Par- liament and the Council shall decide not later than 1 January 2000 and without prejudice to the competence of the Commission, on the further gradual and controlled liberalisation of the postal market, in particular with a view to the liberalisation of cross-border and direct mail, as well as on a further review of the price and weight limits, with effect taking into account the developments, in particular economic, social and technological developments, that have occurred by that date, and also taking into account the financial equi- librium of the universal service provider(s), with a view to further pursuing the goals of this Directive. from 1 January 2003, Such decisions shall be based upon a proposal from the Commission to be tabled before the end of 1998, fol- lowing a review of the sector. Upon request by the Commission, Member States shall provide all the infor- mation necessary for completion of the review. 4. Document exchange may not be reserved. Article 8 The provisions of Article 7 shall be without prejudice to Member States’ right to organise the siting of letter boxes on the public highway, the issue of postage stamps and the registered mail service used in the course of judicial or administrative procedures in accordance with their national legislation. CHAPTER 4 Conditions governing the provision of non-reserved services and access to the network Article 9 1. For non-reserved services which are outside the scope of the universal service as defined in Article 3, Member States may introduce general authorisations to the extent necessary in order to guarantee compliance with the essential requirements. For non-reserved services which are within the scope 2. of the universal service as defined in Article 3, Member States may introduce authorisation procedures, including individual licences, to the extent necessary in order to guarantee compliance with the essential requirements and to safeguard the universal service. The granting of authorisations may: — where appropriate, be made subject to universal service obligations, — if necessary, impose requirements concerning the quality, availability and performance of the relevant services, 21. 1. 98 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities L 15/21 — be made subject to the obligation not to infringe the exclusive or special rights granted to the universal service provider(s) the reserved postal services under Article 7(1) and (2). for 3. The procedures described in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be transparent, non-discriminatory, proportionate and based on objective criteria. Member States must ensure that the reasons for refusing an authorisation in whole or in part are communicated to the applicant and must establish an appeal procedure. In order to ensure that the universal service is safe- 4. guarded, where a Member State determines that the universal service obligations, as provided for by this Directive, represent an unfair financial burden for the universal service provider, it may establish a compensa- tion fund administered for this purpose by a body inde- pendent of the beneficiary or beneficiaries. In this case, it may make the granting of authorisation subject to an obligation to make a financial contribution to that fund. The Member State must ensure that the principles of transparency, non-discrimination and proportionality are respected in establishing the compensation fund and when fixing the level of the financial contributions. Only those services set out in Article 3 may be financed in this way. 5. Member States may provide for an identification system for direct mail, allowing the supervision of such services where they are liberalised. Article 10 1. The European Parliament and the Council, acting on a proposal from the Commission and on the basis of Articles 57(2), 66 and 100a of the Treaty, shall adopt the measures necessary for the harmonisation of the pro- cedures referred to in Article 9 governing the commercial provision to the public of non-reserved postal services. 2. The harmonisation measures referred to in para- graph 1 shall concern, in particular, the criteria to be observed and the procedures to be followed by the postal operator, the manner of publication of those criteria and procedures, as well as to be followed. the appeal procedures the public postal network under conditions which are transparent and non-discriminatory. CHAPTER 5 Tariff principles and transparency of accounts Article 12 Member States shall take steps to ensure that the tariffs for each of the services forming part of the provision of the universal service comply with the following prin- ciples: — prices must be affordable and must be such that all users have access to the services provided, — prices must be geared to costs; Member States may should be applied decide that a uniform tariff throughout their national territory, — the application of a uniform tariff does not exclude the right of to conclude individual agreements on prices with cus- tomers, service provider(s) the universal — tariffs must be transparent and non-discriminatory. Article 13 1. In order to ensure the cross-border provision of the universal service, Member States shall encourage their universal service providers to arrange that in their agree- ments on terminal dues intra-Community cross- for border mail, the following principles are respected: — terminal dues shall be fixed in relation to the costs of processing and delivering incoming cross-border mail, — levels of remuneration shall be related to the quality of service achieved, — terminal dues shall be transparent and non-discrim- inatory. 2. The implementation of these principles may include transitional arrangements designed to avoid undue disrup- tion on postal markets or unfavourable implications for economic operators provided there is agreement between the operators of origin and receipt; such arrangements shall, however, be restricted to the minimum required to achieve these objectives. Article 11 Article 14 The European Parliament and the Council, acting on a proposal from the Commission and on the basis of Articles 57(2), 66 and 100a of the Treaty, shall adopt such harmonisation measures as are necessary to ensure that users and the universal service provider(s) have access to 1. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure, within two years of the date of entry into force of this Directive, that the accounting of the universal service providers is conducted in accordance with the provisions of this Article. L 15/22 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities 21. 1. 98 2. The universal service providers shall keep serparate accounts within their internal accounting systems at least for each of the services within the reserved sector on the one hand and for the non-reserved services on the other. The accounts for the non-reserved services should clearly distinguish between services which are part of the universal service and services which are not. Such internal accounting systems shall operate on the basis of con- ac- sistently applied and objectively justifiable cost counting principles. 3. The accounting systems referred to in paragraph 2 shall, without prejudice to paragraph 4, allocate costs to each of the reserved and to the non-reserved services respectively in the following manner: (a) costs which can be directly assigned to a particular service shall be so assigned; (b) common costs, that is costs which cannot be directly assigned to a particular service, shall be allocated as follows: (i) whenever possible, common costs shall be al- located on the basis of direct analysis of the origin of the costs themselves; (ii) when direct analysis is not possible, common cost categories shall be allocated on the basis of an indirect linkage to another cost category or group of cost categories for which a direct assignment or allocation is possible; the indirect linkage shall be based on comparable cost structures; (iii) when neither direct nor indirect measures of cost allocation can be found, the cost category shall be allocated on the basis of a general allocator computed by using the ratio of all expenses directly or indirectly assigned or allocated, on the one hand, to each of the reserved services and, on the other hand, to the other services. 4. Other cost accounting systems may be applied only if they are compatible with paragraph 2 and have been approved by the national regulatory authority. The Commission shall be informed prior to their application. regulatory authorities shall ensure that 5. National compliance with one of the cost accounting systems described in paragraphs 3 or 4 is verified by a competent service body which is provider. Member States shall ensure that a statement concerning compliance is published periodically. independent of the universal The national regulatory authority shall keep avail- 6. able, to an adequate level of detail, information on the cost accounting systems applied by a universal service provider, and shall such information to the Commission on request. submit 7. On request, detailed accounting information arising from these systems shall be made available in confidence to the national regulatory authority and to the Commis- sion. 8. Where a given Member State has not reserved any of the services reservable under Article 7 and as not es- tablished a compensation fund for universal service provi- sion, as permitted under Article 9(4), and where the national regulatory authority is satisfied that none of the designated universal service providers in that Member State is in receipt of State subvention, hidden or other- wise, the national regulatory authority may decide not to apply the requirements of paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of this Article. The national regulatory authority shall inform the Commission of all such decisions. Article 15 The financial accounts of all universal service providers shall be drawn up, submitted to audit by an independent auditor and published in accordance with the relevant Community and national legislation to commercial undertakings. CHAPTER 6 Quality of services Article 16 shall States Member that quality-of-service ensure standards are set and published in relation to universal service in order to guarantee a postal service of good quality. Quality standards shall focus, times and on the regularity and reliability of services. in particular, on routing These standards shall be set by: — the Member States in the case of national services, — the European Parliament and the Council in the case of intra-Community cross-border services (see Annex). Future adjustment of these standards to technical progress or market developments shall be made in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 21. Independent performance monitoring shall be carried out at least once a year by external bodies having no links with the universal service providers under standardised conditions to be specified in accordance with the pro- cedure laid down in Article 21 and shall be the subject of reports published at least once a year. 21. 1. 98 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities L 15/23 Article 17 Member States shall day down quality standards for national mail and shall ensure that they are compatible with those laid down for intra-Community cross-border services. Member States shall notify their quality standards for national services to the Commission, who will publish them in the same manner as the standards for intra- Community cross-border services referred to in Article 18. National regulatory authorities shall ensure that inde- pendent performance monitoring is carried out in ac- cordance with the fourth subparagraph of Article 16, that the results are justified, and that corrective action is taken where necessary. Article 18 1. In accordance with Article 16, quality standards for intra-Community cross-border services are laid down in the Annex. 2. Where exceptional situations relating to infrastruc- ture or geography so require, the national regulatory authorities may determine exemptions from the quality standards provided for in the Annex. Where national regulatory authorities determine exemptions in this manner, they shall notify the Commission forthwith. The Commission shall submit an annual report of the notifi- cations received during the previous 12 months to the Committee established under Article 21 for its informa- tion. The Commission shall publish in the Official 3. Journal of the European Communities any adjustments made to the quality standards for intra-Community cross- border services and shall take steps to ensure the regular independent monitoring and the publication of per- formance levels certifying compliance with these stan- dards and the progress accomplished. National regulatory authorities shall ensure that corrective action is taken where necessary. Article 19 Member States shall ensure that transparent, simple and inexpensive procedures are drawn up for dealing with users’ complaints, particularly in cases involving loss, theft, damage or non-compliance with service quality standards. Member States shall adopt measures to ensure that those procedures enable disputes to be settled fairly and promptly with provision, where warranted, for a system of reimbursement and/or compensation. Without prejudice to other possibilities of appeal under national and Community legislation, Member States shall ensure that users, acting individually or, where permitted by national law, jointly with organisations representing the interests of users and/or consumers, may bring before the competent national authority cases where users’ complaints to the universal service provider have not been satisfactory resolved. In accordance with Article 16, Member States shall ensure that the universal service providers publish, together with the annual report on the monitoring of their performance, information on the number of complaints and the manner in which they have been dealt with. CHAPTER 7 Harmonisation of technical standards Article 20 The harmonisation of technical standards shall be con- tinued, taking into account in particular the interests of users. The European Committee for Standardisation shall be entrusted with drawing up technical standards applicable in the postal sector on the basis of remits to it pursuant to the principles set out in Council Directive 83/189/EEC of 28 March 1983 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations (1). This work shall the harmonisation take account of measures adopted at international level and in particular those decided upon within the Universal Postal Union. The standards applicable shall be published in the Offi- cial Journal of the European Communities once a year. Member States shall ensure that universal service pro- viders refer to the standards published in the Official Journal where necessary in the interests of users and in particular when they supply the information referred to in Article 6. The Committee provided for in Article 21 shall be kept informed of the discussions within the European Committee for Standardisation and the progress achieved in this area by that body. CHAPTER 8 The committee Article 21 The Commission shall be assisted by a committee composed of the representatives of the Member States and chaired by a representative of the Commission. The committee shall establish its own rules of procedure. (1) OJ L 109, 26. 4. 1983, p. 8. Directive as last amended by Commission Decision 96/139/EC (OJ L 32, 10. 2. 1996, p. 31). L 15/24 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities 21. 1. 98 The representative of the Commission shall submit to the committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft within a time limit which the Chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be de- livered by the majority laid down in Article 148(2) of the Treaty in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article. The Chairman shall not vote. The Commission shall adopt the measures envisaged if the they are committee. in accordance with the opinion of If the measures envisaged are not in accordance with the opinion of the committee, or if no opinion is delivered, to the the Commission shall, without delay, Council a proposal relating to the measures to be taken. submit The Council shall act by a qualified majority. If, upon the expiry of a period of three months from the date of referral to the Council, the Council has not acted, the proposed measures shall be adopted by the Commis- sion. CHAPTER 9 submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Directive, including the appropriate information about developments in the sector, particularly concerning economic, social, employ- ment and technological aspects, as well as about quality of service. The report shall be accompanied where appropriate by proposals to the European Parliament and the Council. Article 24 Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive not later than 12 months after the date of its entry into force. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof. When Member States adopt these measures, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by such reference on the occasion of their official pub- lication. Article 25 This Directive shall enter into force on the 20th day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. The national regulatory authority Article 26 Article 22 Each Member State shall designate one or more national regulatory authorities for the postal sector that are legally separate from and operationally independent of the postal operators. Member States inform the Commission which national regulatory authorities they have designated to carry out the tasks arising from this Directive. shall The national regulatory authorities shall have as a par- ticular task ensuring compliance with the obligations arising from this Directive. They may also be charged with ensuring compliance with competition rules in the postal sector. CHAPTER 10 Final provisions Article 23 1. This Directive shall not prevent any Member State from maintaining or introducing measures which are more liberal than those provided for by this Directive. Such measures must be compatible with the Treaty. 2. Should this Directive lapse, the measures taken by the Member States to implement it may be maintained, to the extent that they are compatible with the Treaty. Article 27 The provisions of this Directive, with the exception of Article 26, shall apply until 31 December 2004 unless otherwise decided in accordance with Article 7(3). Article 28 This Directive is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, 15 December 1997. Without prejudice to Article 7(3), three years after the date of entry into force of this Directive, and in any event no later than 31 December 2000, the Commission shall For the European Parliament For the Council The President J. M. GIL-ROBLES The President J. -C. JUNCKER 21. 1. 98 ‹ EN ‹ Official Journal of the European Communities L 15/25 ANNEX Quality standards for intra-Community cross-border mail The quality standards for intra-Community cross-border mail in each country are to be established in relation to the time limit for routing measured from end to end (*) for postal items of the fastest standard category according to the formula formula D + n, where D represents the date of deposit (**) and n the number of working days which elapse between that date and that delivery to the addressee. Quality standards for intra-Community cross-border mail Time limit D + 3 D + 5 Objective 85 % of items 97 % of items The standards must be achieved not only for the entirety of intra-Community traffic but also for each of the bilateral flows between two Member States. (*) End-to-end routing is measured from the access point to the network to the point of delivery to the addressee. (**) The date of deposit to be taken into account shall be the same day as that on which the item is deposited, provi- ded that deposit occurs before the last collection time notified from the access point to the network in question. When deposit takes place after this time limit, the date of deposit to be taken into consideration will be that of the following day of collection


title: Proces-verbaal van Overeenkomst tussen Canada en de Europese Gemeenschap betreffende de ondertekening van de Overeenkomst inzake internationale normen voor de humane vangst van dieren met behulp van vallen

eurovoc_concepts:
Canada
USSR
animal welfare
bilateral agreement
hunting
hunting regulations
international standard
multilateral agreement
protection of animals
wildlife

text: L 42/42 ‹ ‹NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen 14. 2. 98 (VERTALING) PROCES-VERBAAL van Overeenkomst tussen Canada en de Europese Gemeenschap betreffende de onder- tekening van de Overeenkomst inzake internationale normen voor de humane vangst van dieren met behulp van vallen CANADA EN DE EUROPESE GEMEENSCHAP, NOTA NEMEND van hun wederzijdse verlangen om de Overeenkomst tussen de Europese Gemeenschap, Canada en de Russische Federatie inzake internationale normen voor de humane vangst van dieren met behulp van vallen (hierna te noemen „de Overeenkomst”) in zijn geauthentificeerde versie in de bijlage bij dit proces-verbaal te ondertekenen; ERKENNEND dat de Russische Federatie een onschatbare bijdrage heeft geleverd aan de trilaterale onder- handelingen en de succesvolle sluiting van de Overeenkomst; en ERVAN OVERTUIGD dat de Overeenkomst zo spoedig mogelijk tussen Canada en de Europese Gemeen- schap moet worden toegepast; DE WENS UITSPREKEND dat de Russische Federatie zich zo spoedig mogelijk als partij bij de Overeen- komst aansluit, NODIGEN de Russische Federatie HIERBIJ UIT de Overeenkomst zo spoedig mogelijk te onder- tekenen en KOMEN HIERBIJ OVEREEN dat — de Overeenkomst, in afwachting van de inwerkingtreding tussen de drie partijen, op bila- terale basis van toepassing zal zijn tussen Canada en de Europese Gemeenschap vanaf een binnen 30 dagen tussen de partijen overeen te komen datum volgend op de datum van nederlegging van de akten van bekrachtiging, sluiting of aanvaarding door Canada en de Europese Gemeenschap; — de Russische versie van de Overeenkomst, pas authentiek zal zijn vanaf de datum van inwerkingtreding van de Overeenkomst tussen de drie partijen. Gedaan te Brussel in het Engels op 15 december 1997, in tweevoud, Voor de Europese Gemeenschap Voor de regering van Canada


title: Директива 97/75/ЕО на Съвета от 15 декември 1997 година за изменение и разширяване приложението за Обединено кралство Великобритания и Северна Ирландия на Директива 96/34/ЕО относно рамковото споразумение за родителски отпуск, сключено между Съюза на конфедерациите на индустриалците и на работодателите в Европа (UNICE), Европейския център на предприятията с държавно участие (CEEP) и Европейската конфедерация на профсъюзите (ЕКП)

eurovoc_concepts:
Northern Ireland
United Kingdom
family policy
framework agreement
national implementing measure
parental leave

formats: html pdf print xhtml

text: 05/т. 5 BG Официален вестник на Европейския съюз 31 31997L0075 L 10/24 ОФИЦИАЛЕН ВЕСТНИК НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИТЕ ОБЩНОСТИ 16. 1. 1998 ДИРЕКТИВА 97/75/ЕО НА СЪВЕТА от 15 декември 1997 година за изменение и разширяване приложението за Обединено кралство Великобритания и Северна Ирландия на Директива 96/34/ЕО относно рамковото споразумение за родителски отпуск, сключено между Съюза на конфедерациите на индустриалците и на работодателите в Европа (UNICE), Европейския център на предприятията с държавно участие (CEEP) и Европейската конфедерация на профсъюзите (ЕКП) жените в областта на възможностите за работа и третирането при работа, както и съвместяването на професионалния и семейния живот; като има предвид, че приемането на настоящата директива ще направи възможно прилагането на Директива 96/34/ЕО в Обеди- неното кралство; като има предвид, че от датата на влизане в сила на настоящата директива, терминът „държави-членки“, който фигурира в Директива 96/34/ЕО трябва да се тълкува като термин, който включва и Обединеното кралство, ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩАТА ДИРЕКТИВА: Член 1 Без това да засяга разпоредбите на член 2, Директива 96/34/ЕО се прилага в Обединеното кралство Великобритания и Северна Ирландия. Член 2 В член 2 на Директива 96/34/ЕО се включва следният параграф 1а: „1а. По отношение на Обединеното кралство Великобритания и Северна Ирландия, датата 3 юни 1998 г. , която фигурира в параграф 1, се заменя с 15 декември 1999 г. “. Член 3 Адресати на настоящата директива са държавите-членки. Съставено в Брюксел на 15 декември 1997 година. За Съвета Председател J. -C. JUNCKER СЪВЕТЪТ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ, като взе предвид Договора за създаване на Европейската общност, и по-специално член 100 от него, като взе предвид предложението на Комисията (1), като взе предвид становището на Европейския парламент (2), като взе предвид становището на Икономическия и социален комитет (3), като има предвид, че Съветът, в съответствие със споразумението за социалната политика, приложено към Протокол № 14 към Договора, и по-специално член 4, параграф 2 от него, прие Дирек- тива 96/34/EО (4); като има предвид, че поради това упоменатата директива не се прилага в Обединеното кралство Великобритания и Северна Ирландия; г. , със 1997 отбеляза, задоволство като има предвид, че Европейският съвет в Амстердам от 16 и 17 юни че Междуправителствената конференция е постигнала съгласие за включването на Споразумението за социалната политика в Дого- вора и бе посочено също така, че трябва да се намери средство, посредством което да се даде юридически израз на желанието на Обединеното кралство Великобритания и Северна Ирландия да приеме директивите, които вече са били одобрени на базата на това споразумение, преди подписването на Договора от Амстердам; като има предвид, че настоящата директива се стреми да постигне тази цел чрез разпростирането на действието на Директива 96/34/ЕО по отношение на Обединеното кралство; като има предвид, че фактът, че Директива 96/34/EО не се при- лага в Обединеното кралство, има пряко влияние върху функцио- нирането на общия пазар; като има предвид, че прилагането във всички държави-членки на рамковото споразумение, приложено към упоменатата директива, и в частност на принципа за съвместяване на родителските и професионалните отговорности на работещите родители ще подобри функционирането на общия пазар; като има предвид, че прилагането на рамковото споразумение има за цел, по-специално, да постигне равното третиране на мъжете и (1) ОВ C 335, 6. 11. 1997 г. (2) ОВ C 371, 8. 12. 1997 г. (3) ОВ C 355, 21. 11. 1997 г. (4) ОВ L 145, 19. 6. 1996 г. , стр. 4