title: Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - Implementing European Union strategy on defence-related industries

eurovoc_concepts:
EU policy
action programme
arms industry
defence policy
industrial restructuring

text: COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 04. 12. 1997 COM(97) 583 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS IMPLEMENTING EUROPEAN UNION STRATEGY ON DEFENCE-RELATED INDUSTRIES 'hllfe-; •K •• •• " 1 V r •V •Til' " * •. =--?;• * ** »i". • ' ' J ";. • £ • *. • * ;: ' •" >. •*' - V J"* IMPLEMENTING EUROPEAN UNION STRATEGY ON DEFENCE-RELATED INDUSTRIES SUMMARY industries The need to implement a European Union strategy to keep up with the major changes in is becoming more pressing every day. The the European defence-related industrial and technological base of defence are both precious in terms of economic development and indispensable for weapons capabilities. Despite the urgent warning and in its Communication of January 1996 on the call for action issued by the Commission defence-related then. in the sector has deteriorated the situation industry, in the industry fell by 13% between 1993 and 1995. In 1995 the value of Employment European Union imports of defence-related products from the United States was six times the value of its exports of the same category, whereas in 1990 the ratio was five to one, and in 1985, four to one. In 1996 it took eight European defence undertakings to achieve sales worth $60 billion, while the three biggest American undertakings alone achieved sales of $90 billion. This trend is even more worrying when one considers how it compromises in the Treaty on European the "eventual framing of a common defence policy". The essential Union concerning responsibility States. restructuring for their cooperation within the framework of the Union is important and the However, purpose of of such cooperation. the political objectives formally enshrined the Commission's the development is to facilitate the Member the defence lies with initiatives industry since An integrated European market for defence products must be set up using a combination of all the instruments at the Union's disposal: Community and Common Foreign and Security Policy legislative and non-legislative instruments. The Commission proposes a global approach to implementing this strategy: — a proposal for a Common Position on drawing up a European armaments policy. the proposed CFSP Common The Commission calls on the Council Position to such a in order to open up the debate on the major issues relating policy and promote the Member States' commitment to its establishment. The areas specifically public procurement and common customs arrangements. the proposal are intracommunity covered by transfers, to adopt - an Action Plan for the defence-related industries. The Plan put forward by the Commission describes the areas in which immediate EU action seems necessary. The Commission will take appropriate steps to develop more detailed versions of the measures outlined in the Plan. The speed and scale of current change make it imperative for practical action on this matter in 1998. the Union to initiate 1. THE CONTEXT industry has been undergoing In the last few years the European defence-related restructuring, shaped notably by international competition. The process involves, inter alia, shedding jobs and reducing production capacity. National frameworks no longer have the capacity to achieve the scale of is now essential to provide adequate restructuring needed. A European framework solutions, but it has not yet evolved into a source of rules governing a European market the new security environment and 2 for armaments. Similarly, the objective of gradually defining a European defence policy is accepted, but the first steps towards a common defence initiative have not yet produced any list of specific European needs regarding defence equipment. The essential responsibility for the restructuring process lies with the Member States because of the nature of the sector. However, cooperation between them at European level seems important for the success of this process. The purpose of the Commission's initiatives is to facilitate the development of such cooperation. The process of restructuring and consolidating the European defence-related industry, which should be carried out on a European scale, cannot progress satisfactorily unless market barriers are lifted and a clear, reliable political and institutional frame of reference is provided. The European Union must take the necessary steps to establish this regulatory framework. The urgent need for such action is still greater given the fact that the European industry's biggest competitor, the United States industry, has achieved a much greater level of consolidation with the open and practical support of the Administration. The US industry's success in exporting arms to international markets is closely linked to the size of the American undertakings and their special relationship with government. The Commission Communication on the aerospace industry1, which highlights the striking difference between the situations on either side of the Atlantic, calls for a reaction at Community level and contains some valuable suggestions on this matter which are equally applicable to other sections of the defence-related industry. The Union accepted the need to adopt a strategy in this area as far back as the summer of 1995, when the Council established a working party on European arms policy with a mandate to put forward specific measures for areas within the Union's jurisdiction; these recommendations could be formulated as Community or CFSP measures. After two years of work, although the group has been unable to formulate any recommendations, it has made useful progress in defining the special characteristics of this sector and identifying areas in which action should be taken as a priority. The Treaty of Amsterdam sets the course for the development of an armaments policy. Article J. 7. 1 stipulates that "The progressive framing of a common defence policy will be supported, as Member States consider appropriate, by cooperation between them in the field of armaments. " The Declaration on Western European Union, which will be annexed to the Amsterdam Treaty and was adopted by the WEU Council of Ministers on 22 July 1997, provides for armaments cooperation between the EU and WEU "in the context of rationalisation of the European armaments market and the establishment of a European Armaments Agency. " The imminent establishment within the WEU of the Joint Organization for Armaments Cooperation (OCCAR), which will have important responsibilities in the management of joint armaments programmes, is an essential step towards setting up the European Armaments Agency. The latter body, which will have extensive responsibilities for all factors affecting the definition and organization of demand for armaments products, will facilitate industry. Commission initiatives are also contributing to this process by helping to create a suitable environment for setting up the Agency sooner rather than later. In the interests of economic efficiency, the creation of a European market for defence products and the the restructuring and consolidation of the European defence COM(97) 466. establishment of the Agency should not be treated as unconnected. Complementary rules of operation should be developed for the market and the Agency so that a homogeneous overall framework can be established. The establishment of OCCAR and the preparation for setting up the European Armaments Agency must take full account of EU acquis. This, together with the development of a European armaments policy, means that more effective links will have to be established between Union institutions and the Western European Armaments Group (WEAG). As far back as January 1996 the Commission presented a Communication on the challenges facing the European defence-related industry in which it outlined the action the Union should take. The strategy indicated in this document was approved by Parliament which, in June 1997 adopted a detailed resolution on EU initiatives. The Economic and Social Committee also approved the communication. The Commission has built up close links with the defence-related industry and through meetings and discussions with its representatives it has identified the most important areas in which action should be taken in the short and medium term. It has to be said that since the Communication was adopted in January 1996 the situation of the defence industry has deteriorated still further. The warning then issued by the Commission did not trigger action at Community level. According to BICC (Bonn International Center for Conversion) data for 1997, employment in the defence-related industry fell by 13% between 1993 and 1995. US Arms Control & Disarmament Agency statistics show that in 1995 the value of European Union imports of defence-related products from the United States was six times the value of its exports in the same category; in 1990 the ratio was five to one; in 1985 four to one. In 1996, thanks to consolidation, the three biggest American defence undertakings achieved sales of more than $90 billion, while it took the eight biggest European undertakings to achieve a total of $60 billion in sales. These figures should be considered in the light of the fact that there is a single internal market for American companies which is considerably bigger than all the Member States' markets put together. Since 1990 the market for defence products has fallen significantly in the Member States because of the end of the Cold War. The United States, faced with a similar decline, reacted to the new situation by restructuring its defence-related industry. The European market is still too fragmented and the level of intracommunity trade in defence equipment is astoundingly low compared to total procurement by the Member States. This downward trend in the industrial base is all the more worrying if one considers how it compromises the objectives formally adopted by the Member States. The Amsterdam Treaty, which was finalised at the Amsterdam European Council in June 1997 and signed on 2 October, provides for the first time (in the first subparagraph of Article J. 7. 1) that "the common foreign and security policy shall include all questions relating to the security of the Union, including the progressive framing of a common defence policy. which might lead to a common defence, should the European Council so decide. " The Atlantic Alliance, at its ministerial meeting in June 1996 and at the Madrid Summit in July 1997, stressed the emergence within the Alliance of a European security and defence identity and set out a number of guidelines to further this process. But there can be no European defence policy or identity without a healthy and competitive European technological and industrial base. 2. EUROPEAN UNION STRATEGY The need to implement a European Union strategy to keep up with the major changes in the European defence-related industries is becoming more pressing every day. The most important undertakings in the sector and the association representing them at European level are calling for action by EU institutions. The defence-related industry and the context in which it operates are changing fast, although not so fast as its American counterpart. The factors driving this change are still at work. The Commission Communication on the European aerospace industry2 stresses the importance of these changes in the United States and the need for drastic action in Europe. It is not possible for the aerospace industry of any single Member State alone to maintain adequate performance and competitiveness. It is vital to consolidate the industry's non-military and military activities at European level. The same applies other defence-related sectors. There, too, change within the industry must be accompanied by public measures at European level. The industry needs a reliable and transparent frame of political and legal reference and it needs it soon. The Commission Communication of January 19963 gave rise to a widespread debate, a key product of which was the Parliament resolution adopted in May 1997 which strongly endorsed the Commission's ideas. The Council's working party on European armaments policy ("Polarm") has reviewed the positions of the Member States and found a number of points of convergence: Firstly, the Union must maintain the industrial and technological base of its defence- related industry. This base, which increasingly involves dual-use products, is valuable for economic development and indispensable for a weapons capability. The reasons for maintaining it therefore relate to establishing a European defence identity and to competitiveness and jobs in crucial manufacturing sectors. Secondly, the Union is one of the preferred frameworks for action in this area. It complements others such as the national frameworks and those of the defence organisations to which most Member States belong. The Community framework has proved its efficacy in setting up European markets for non-defence products; Union instruments can now also serve the same purpose for defence products. This kind of market would be of great benefit to the defence industry. The Union should therefore apply a combination of its legislative, non-legislative, first pillar and second pillar instruments. Thirdly, the different strategies afforded by these instruments need to be combined because of the particular nature of the defence industry, namely that it is both a major means of production and essential to foreign and security policy. Any action by the European Union has to take this dual nature into account, if necessary by adapting the resources within the Community's jurisdiction. Presented in September 1997. 3 COM (96) 10: The challenges facing the European defence-related industry, a contribution for action at European level In conclusion: Action should be taken at once, without waiting for a new institutional context to be established, in areas in which it is urgently needed to protect the defence sector's technological and industrial base. 3. COMMISSION INITIATIVES The Commission proposes a global approach to implementing EU strategy: • A proposal for a Common Position on drawing up a European armaments policy. The Commission herewith sends to the Counci1 a draft Common Position adopted under Article J. 2 of the Treaty on European Union. This form of CFSP instrument has been used because of the foreign policy and defence dimensions of any European Union measures on arms. Following work done earlier by the Council, the Common Position proposed by the Commission sets out a number of principles and indicates where the first steps should be taken. The areas specifically covered by the proposal are intracommunity transfers, public procurement and common customs arrangements. The Council has already done work on them, specifically in connection with armaments. Furthermore, their advantage is that EU measures could be based on a substantial acquis communautaire in these areas. This proposal for a Common Position should open up the debate on the major issues relating to European armaments by directly involving policy-makers in the decision-making at the appropriate levels. It is intended to promote Member States' political commitment to the progressive establishment of a genuine European armaments policy. • An Action Plan for the defence-related industries. The Commission has drawn up a list of areas in which it considers EU action necessary and specifies what measures should be taken at once to ensure progress towards a true European market for defence products. Some of these measures require legislation while others could be adopted under instruments already available to the Union. The Action Plan has been drafted for the attention of the EU institutions and the Member States, but also for the European defence industry. The Commission will take the necessary steps to develop more detailed versions of the measures outlined in the Plan. In the Commission's view the Council should adopt a position on EU strategy on the defence-related industries as a matter of urgency. The proposed measures would provide a framework and a programme for initiatives at European level. The speed and scale of current change make it imperative for the Union to initiate practical action on this matter in 1998. CONCLUSIONS • The Council is asked to adopt the proposal set out in Annex I. • The Commission calls on the Council to take note of the Action Plan attached as Annex II. The Commission will take the appropriate initiatives following the procedures provided for by the Treaty in close collaboration with the relevant authorities in the Member States. • The Commission calls on the European defence-related industries and other parties concerned to cooperate in the implementation of the Action Plan. DRAFT COMMON POSITION ON FRAMING A EUROPEAN ARMAMENTS POLICY adopted on the basis of Article J. 2 of the Treaty on European Union. ANNEX I THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article J. 2 thereof, Whereas drawing up a European armaments policy based on the existence of a competitive technological and industrial base is an essential precondition for the development of a European defence identity within the framework of the Common Foreign and Security Policy; Whereas specific measures, including measures on armaments, must be taken to follow up on the political commitment to the progressive framing of a defence identity which was reaffirmed by the Amsterdam European Council of 16 and 17 June 1997; Whereas the Declaration by Western European Union on the role of WEU and its relations with the European Union, adopted on 22 July 19 97, and in particular paragraph 7 thereof, provides for greater cooperation between these two organisations; Whereas Community policies and instruments can make an important contribution to developing a European armaments policy; Whereas the Commission Communications of January 1996 on the defence-related industries and of September 1997 on the European aerospace industry, which focus on the urgent need to restructure the industries at European level and promote synergy between military and non-military production and trade, demonstrate the necessity of taking action at European level, in particular through the Community; ) Whereas it is necessary to protect the industrial and technological defence base and promote the competitiveness of the European industry; Whereas the defence industry is an important source of -employment in some regions; Whereas the Council has named intracommunity transfers and public procurement as priority areas for EU action; Whereas in is in the interests of the European Union and the Community that certain imports of arms and equipment for the European armed forces should benefit from exemption from customs duties and a list of- equipments suitable for exemption from such duties is therefore, needed; Whereas, in accordance with Article 223(2) of the Treaty the Council has drawn up a list of products to which the provisions of Article 223(l)(b) apply, HAS ADOPTED THIS COMMON POSITION: Article 1 For the purposes of this Common Position account shall be taken of the specific features of the armaments sector as defined in the annexed document. Article 2 The Council considers that developing an effective European armaments policy entails using CFSP and Community instruments. Article 3 The Council notes that European armaments policy is linked to Community policies, in particular on industry, trade, customs, the regions, competition, innovation and research. Article 4 The Council notes that the Commission has presented an Action Plan for the defence-related industries calling for the application of a number of Community instruments and that the Commission will take the appropriate initiatives to ensure that it is implemented. The Council declares its intention of using the Plan to further develop a European armaments policy. Article 5 In accordance with Article M of the Treaty on European Union, the following measures will be adopted as soon as possible following the appropriate procedures: 1. Movement of goods - a simplified system applicable to intracommunity transfers including export and re-export guarantees, and monitoring and surveillance mechanisms; - binding principles, rules and mechanisms on transparency and non-discrimination in respect of procurement, taking current Community public procurement rules as a guiding principle. 2. Customs The Council undertakes to draw up, before 31 December 1998, a list of products which could be exempt from the common customs tariff in the light of the defence needs of the Member States and the desirability of encouraging the development of a European armaments policy. °i Taking account of this list Commission will, where appropriate, make appropriate proposals for exemptions based on the Treaty establishing the European Community. Article 6 This Common Position shall be. reviewed 18 months after its adoption. c Article 7 This Common Position shall enter into force on the day of its adoption. This Common Position shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities. lu Appendix to Annex I Definition of specific characteristics of the defence-related sector (Text drafted by the working party on European armaments policy and approved by the Coreper on 10 December 1996) 1. Any definition of the characteristics specific to the defence-related sector must begin with the current circumstances in which the sector finds itself. There are a number of political and economic factors which have specific relevance for this sector. On the political side, there is the impact of the end of the Cold War and the changes that have resulted in the international climate in which foreign, security and defence policy is formulated and conducted. There is also the development of the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), which "shall include all questions related to the security of the Union, including the eventual framing of a common defence policy, which might in time lead to a common defence". The EU's Intergovernmental Conference is currently reviewing the CFSP provisions of the Treaty on European Union. At its meeting in Berlin in June 1996, the NATO Ministerial Council agreed to develop the European security and defence identity within NATO, and the WEU and NATO are currently working on the implementation of the inter-related aspects of the decisions taken in Berlin. On the economic side, the domestic demand for European defence equipment has been falling since 1987 and the global arms market has practically halved in the last decade. This reduction in the national defence budgets of European countries has implications for the survival of an independent industrial and technological defence base. Employment in this sector has fallen by 37% since 1984 (from 1. 6 million to 1 million). This has hit certain regions in particular and has implications for the manufacturing base and innovation capacity of European industry as a whole. The market remains fragmented - in the 1988-92 period, intra-European trade amounted to 3-4% of total procurement. The lack of competition and impossibility of fully exploiting economies of scale has worsened the competitive position of the European industry vis-à-vis the US since the 1980s. The consolidation of defence-related industry has advanced much more in the US than in Europe, due to, inter alia, less fragmented market conditions in the US, an insufficient degree of harmonisation of European operational requirements and the various security imperatives in Europe. The specific characteristics of the armaments sector, which have been acknowledged since the foundation of the Community, are taken into account by the provisions of Article 223 of the Treaty. // to national defence. Unlike 4. The defence-related industry is a strategic industry, the products of which can be crucial industries, where economic considerations are the determining factor, security and defence policy, to vaiying degrees, also dictates national armaments policy. Political, strategic and security considerations accordingly come into play in determining the conditions within which the industry operates and the demand for its products. in other 5. 90% of the production of EU defence equipment is concentrated in some Member States: France, UK, Germany, Italy and Sweden. Since governments are the only customers, and in some cases a major owner of defence industries, the market differs from most other sectors of the economy. Also, relations between the government and defence-related companies differ considerably between Member States, for example the extent of State ownership, the extent of funding for R&D, etc. The role of governments explains many of the characteristics of this sector and has a major influence on the way it is built up and restructured. At the same time, the industry itself has a specific role and responsibilities in this regard. The following considerations arise in the context of the role of governments : in the first place, the production and trade of armaments are subject to governmental authorisation ; - secondly, governments being the sole customers, they are therefore alone in As sole defining operational requirements and customers, governments determine demand for the industry's products ; technical specifications. - furthermore, long-term demand cannot be forecast with certainty, since it is dependent on the evolution of threats, which influences the assessment of needs and budget planning; - - in addition, the quality-price relationship is not the sole criterion which determines procurement policy. Offset (compensation), including industrial co operation agreements, as well as strategic political, economic and security considerations can also be a factor ; finally, national defence interests require guaranteed sources of supply. The requirement for security of supply goes beyond the normal customer supplier In certain areas, some Member States consider an indigenous relationship. capability essential for their national interest. This should not, however, prevent governments from purchasing from an external supplier. II The long-term technological value of the industry is important. This includes the maintenance of both technological and industrial capabilities. Defence programmes can be spread out over 20-30 years, and, following lengthy development programmes, equipment can have an in-service life of as much as 30 years or more. 8. Confidentiality regarding sensitive military information to national interests. This can lead to constraints on competition and to relationships between customer and supplier which are more close-knit than usual. is crucial 9. Many products in the armament sector carry disproportionately high Research & Development costs. High standards are required, as technological advances are necessary to national defence. However, returns on this investment are uncertain. Mass production, which might offset high R+D costs, is rare in comparison with civil industry. The need for confidentiality can preclude the wide circulation of technological developments and the financial benefits of such a circulation. There will always be a need for one-off products, which it may be uneconomical to produce. Numbers of programmes are limited and R+D teams sometimes cannot be supported by purely commercial means during intervals between programmes. Commercial organisations driven by market-t forces could not be expected to make the necessary investment in R+D and government support could be therefore required. 10. Some defence-related technologies can have both civil aid military applications. However, there is an increasing synergy between civil and military technologies in some areas and the above characteristics of purely military programmes may not apply to all defence-related or dual-use domains. 11. The exports of this sector are subject to government authorisation. Arms export policies, including export control policies of Member States, differ. The European Council has adopted Common Criteria to be applied to arms exports. Conclusions and recommendations ' 12. It was concluded that the analyses contained in this paper of characteristics specific to the defence-related sector is a useful contribution to the ongoing consideration of items on the agenda of the Ad Hoc Working Party on European Armaments Policy, and will be taken into account as appropriate, inter alia, in the deepening discussions on "the simplification of controls governing intra-EU transfers of armaments and other defence related products" and "procurement policy". It is recommended that in accordance with its mandate the Ad Hoc Working Party should keep the item "definition of characteristics specific to the defence-related sector" on its agenda, with a view to further developing its analyses in the light of future developments. /5 EUROPEAN COMMISSION •b •Ù -to -à te 4* /Annex ÏI Action Plan for the defence-related industries h Action Plan for the defence-related industry I. Introduction II. Defence industry restructuring III. The European Defence Technological and Industrial Base IV. Objectives for an Action Plan V. Actions V. l V. 2 V. 3 V. 4 V. 5 V. 6. V. 7 V. 8 V. 9 V. 10 V. ll V. 12 V. 13 V. 14 Simplification of Intra-community transfers European Company Statute Public Procurement RTD (Research and Technological Development) Standardisation Custom duties Innovation, transfer of technology and SME's Competition policy Exports Structural funds Taxation Principles for market access Benchmarking Enlargement VI. Timetable 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6. 7 8 9 9 9 10 IS I. INTRODUCTION The Treaty on European Union as well as the new Amsterdam Treaty offer a context for action in the area of defence-related industries by calling for enhanced co-operation between the European Union and the Western European Union. For this co-operation, the European Commission could offer its experience and legal and administrative structures in support of this new relationship. The necessary urgent restructuring of the defence industries in Europe, which are still nationally based, requires that a European dimension is provided to this industry and to the market, demand and supply sides, in which it operates. As far as the demand side is concerned, the role of Member States, the WEU and other multilateral organisations is particularly important in areas such as the harmonisation in time and content of operational requirements and the creation of a European Armament Agency to run programmes with a European dimension. As far as the supply side is concerned, intense discussions, during the recent months, between the Commission and industry have been useful in identifying industry's requirements to establish a strong, integrated and competitive European Defence Technological and Industrial Base. This Action Plan takes into account the issues raised by industry that fall within the competence of the European Union. It will be implemented according to the Timetable provided in chapter VI. Some of these actions were also drawn up together with a Common Position, under Article J. 2 of the Common and Foreign Security Policy (CFSP). II. DEFENCE INDUSTRY RESTRUCTURING In response to declining demand and increasing competition a restructuring process has started among the European defence industries. So far the restructuring has mainly taken place on a national level, but the need to pursue these efforts at a European level is pressing. The European industry must be allowed to carry out the necessaiy restructuring process, co-operate or merge activities where they are similar or complementary and improve its competitive position. Whilst industry must lead this process, the Member States and European Institutions and Organisations must strive to establish the necessaiy framework to allow for the proper functioning of the European defence-related equipment market. When creating this framework the European industry's position in the global arena must be taken into account. (G III. THE EUROPEAN DEFENCE TECHNOLOGICAL AND INDUSTRIAL BASE The defence technological and industrial base, including technological know-how, R&D facilities, a skilled work-force, manufacturing facilities and a marketing and export capacity, is a vital strategic asset for Europe and needs therefore to be consolidated and preserved. Some very important reasons for this are: - - - It is a pre-requisite for the establishment of a genuine European Security and Defence Identity; It is a necessity for the preservation and the development of an important technological and industrial base which is of importance both for military and civil purposes; It is an important factor for employment, particularly in specific European regions, and for many SME's. The situation as it is today, with European companies fragmented into too many and too small national suppliers, is no longer sustainable. The consequences of the present structure are for example: - Costly research and development of similar technologies and systems by national suppliers; - Too small batches of systems and therefore inadequate economies of scale. IV. OBJECTIVES FOR AN ACTION PLAN The main objectives of the Action Plan are therefore to establish the necessaiy conditions to: - strengthen the competitiveness of the European defence industry; - preserve the Defence Technological and Industrial Base; - favour the integration of European Defence Technological and Industrial Base in the general economy to avoid duplication of efforts between the civil and the military areas; - create the necessary preconditions for a European Security and Defence Identity. V. ACTIONS A timetable for the actions proposed below can be found in chapter VI. The timetable shows that the Commission will work in parallel with actions to be implemented in the short term and actions that will be implemented in the medium term. V. l Simplification of Intra-communitv transfers National procedures relating to intra-Community transfers of defence related products are burdensome and time consuming. A simplification of these procedures could increase the competitiveness of the European defence industry and lighten the administrative tasks and reduce costs. 1} The simplification objective cannot be obtained without a significant commitment by Member States. It also supposes the establishment of confidence mechanisms between the Member States. The Commission will therefore propose to put in place a simplified licensing system applicable to the shipment of defence related products within the European Community. This system shall comprise guaranties for exports and re-exports as well as mechanisms for control and surveillance. V. 2 European Company Statute The creation of a European Company Statute which would help the creation and management of companies with a European dimension will facilitate the necessaiy restructuring of this industry. The Commission will continue its efforts to create such a legal framework. The report of the "Davignon Group" on the European Company Statute opens new perspectives for political agreement on employee involvement in the European Company in the months ahead. If this hurdle can be overcome it could lead the way to the adoption of* the Statute as one of the priority measures foreseen in the Single Market Action Plan agreed at the Amsterdam European Council of the European Union. It is therefore important to obtain a favourable Council decision on this subject as soon as possible. V. 3 Public procurement The concrete system of rules that will apply to procurement of' defence equipment will impact substantially on the way a competitive Defence Technological and Industrial Base will be set up. This framework should make provision for competitive tendering whenever feasible. Furthermore, it must favour the maintenance and development of the fundamental industrial capabilities and key technologies at European level. In addition, these rules must guarantee the security of the necessary supply, while enabling a progressive elimination of over-capacity. To this end, taking into account the need to build broad support in this matter, it is necessary to establish an appropriate set of principles, rules and mechanisms on procurement by the defence sector. In order to take into account the specificities of the defence sector, and in particular the need for confidentiality and security of supplies, an appropriate level of flexibility should be envisaged where necessary. For this purpose, materials for the defence sector could be divided into three categories: - Products intended for the armed forces but not for military use therefore not covered by Article 223 EC nor by Article 2 of the directive 93/36 (markets declared secret, protection of vital interests, national security, etc). As these products are already subject to the Community public procurement rules, the Commission will specify, where appropriate, in the most suitable form the conditions for the application of these rules; - Products intended for the armed forces and for military use, but not constituting " highly sensitive defence equipments ". The Commission could work out a fairly flexible set of rules, while respecting the principles of transparency and non discrimination, inspired by the existing Community public procurement rules; IP - Highly sensitive equipments covered by the scope of Article 223 EC. These products could be exempted from the rules referred to above when safety or the protection of vital national interests of the country in question so require. A notification mechanism for this purpose should be foreseen in order to ensure a degree of control and transparency. V. 4 RTD (Research and Technological Development The level of research and development costs in relation to turnover is in general much higher in the military field than in the civil field. Technology plays a vital role for the competitiveness in these industries. Increasing integration of civil and military research activities within company's is a reality in the United States, in particular in certain sectors of the defence-related industry such as aeronautics or space. The Commission, for example, highlighted this phenomenon in its analysis of the merger between Boeing and McDonnell Douglas. It is therefore desirable that the European firms as well as Member States draw the conclusions from this development as regards the restructuring of these industries, the merging of research teams, and the impact of certain military purchases on the civil technological capacity. for Research and Technological The Community's Framework Programme Development4, is aimed solely at civil objectives. Some of the technological areas covered (e. g. materials, Information and Communication Technologies - ICT) have a multiple use dimension: the development of these technologies can contribute to the improvement of the defence technological base and the competitivness of this industry. The Commission also considers that the complementarity between national and European research programmes should be reinforced to avoid a wasteful duplication of effort. V. 5 Standardisation Setting up a European defence equipment market and consolidating Europe's defence industrial base will call for an effort to rationalise the sets of standards currently being used by the defence ministries of the Member States. With increasing use being made of dual-use technologies in the military systems, the current trend is to make as much use as possible of civil standards. The on-going replacement of military standards by civil standards in the US should be considered so as to avoid that the European industry finding itself at a disadvantage. It is with the purpose of promoting the use of international industrial standards that the Commission is proposing to take into account the experience gathered in the field of standardisation by the Community. 4 The Commission adopted, on 9 April 1997, its proposal for the Fifth Framework Programme (COM(97)142). n Therefore, the Commission will pursue the following actions: - inviting the industrial circles concerned to get together to draw up a work programme for for defence equipment programmes; identifying a homogeneous system of standards - assessing different ways and means of setting up a system of regular exchange of information between NATO and the European standardisation bodies, so as to reduce as far as possible the risk of duplication of efforts in the future; - providing support at Community level to the standardisation organisations concerned that have agreed on the need to act. For this support, careful consideration will be devoted to taking account of the particular characteristics of the industrial sectors concerned (aeronautics, space, electronics, mechanics. ) and the "defence" specificity of the topics covered. V. 6 Customs duties Common tariffs for imported products is a basic principle of the Customs Union and the Single Market. Article 28 of the Treaty therefore constitutes the only permissible legal basis for granting autonomous suspensions. In this respect, the existence of differing national approaches for tariff arrangements for imports of military or dual-use equipment generates unequal treatment of operators and for this reason common rules on the tariff arrangements for such equipment need to be established. Therefore: - - legislative initiatives should be taken to harmonise tariff arrangements with a view to achieve equal treatment of operators throughout the Community; the Commission proposal from 1988, for temporary suspension of import duties on certain weapons and military equipments, should be reviewed and adopted; V. 7 Innovation, transfer of technology and SME's In the Commission's Green Paper on Innovation dated December 1995 the potential for civilian use of defence technologies is acknowledged. General policies to promote technology transfer can facilitate the civilian exploitation of defence technologies; and should also involve SMEs because of their interest and role in this process. In this context, the Commission will support initiatives for the purpose of disseminating ideas, technologies and best practices. In particular, the Commission will continue to support the following activities: - - the organisation of partnering events between suppliers (e. g. INTERPRISE) and between suppliers and research institutes; the organisation of partnering events between main contractors and suppliers (e. g. IBEX). 2à V. 8 Competition policy The emergence of a Community market for the defence industry, resulting from common programmes, from necessary restructuring and European alliances, and from common rules on public procurement requires that the Community's competition policy examines in an appropriate way all competition issues within the defence industry. The process of restructuring the European industry, in particular the defence industry and related industries, has given rise and will continue to give rise to an increasing number of mergers and co-operations between companies within the European Union. Such a development must be welcomed as being in line with the requirements of dynamic competition and capable of increasing the competitiveness of the European industry, in particular the defence industry, insofar as it does not result in lasting damage to competition. This the is why Community competition policy and Community Merger Control Regulation provides for a clear framework and quick decisions, so as to facilitate those concentrations and co-operations between companies which do not call into question effective competition. Moreover, Community control of State aids in all industrial sectors, including those of the defence sector, makes it possible to distinguish between those aids necessary for restructuring - to the extent they accelerate change, encourage research, development and innovation and reduce the social consequences of reorganisation - and for the preservation of adequate security of supply, and those aids granted for by Member States for the mere protection of their national companies which do not promote the overall competitiveness of the sector. in particular In this respect, it is important to recognise the specificity of the defence-related industry in the application of Community competition policy, in particular as regards the geographical scope of the market. Whilst this scope may be kept limited by public procurement rules and administrative procedures, competition may increasingly take place for certain products, at European or even world wide scale. In this context, the Commission will take into account the manner in which, in particular, governments of third countries which produce armaments formulate and apply competition law to their own industry. V. 9 Exports Dual-use goods and technologies A common regime for dual-use exports controls was adopted by the Council in December 1994, on a proposal from the Commission. It is based on two legal instruments, an article 113 Regulation (No 3381/94) and a Joint Action under the Common Foreign and Security Policy (94/942/CFSP) which together form an integrated system. This regime reflects the international arrangements to prevent proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. For dual-use goods, industry and administrations are invited to provide evidence if they face disadvantages under European export control compared to US and Japanese controls. The Commission will work to balance the situation and create a level playing field in this area if such a need exists. dl The Commission will draw a report on the application of the Dual-use regulation and possible proposals to strengthen and improve the current system particularly taking into account the ruling of the European Court of Justice in cases C-70/94 and C-83/94 that states that dual-use goods fall within the scope of the common commercial policy defined by Article 113. Conventional armaments Increasing industrial co-operation in the form of transnational co-operations and mergers is necessary to achieve an efficient industry structure. It is therefore urgent to eliminate limits to such co-operations arising from differing export policies. In this respect it should be recalled that political guidelines already exist, notably in the form of 8 criteria adopted by the European Councils in Luxembourg (June 1991) and Lisbon (June 1992) to guide Member States in their decisions concerning arms exports. Given the difficulties in developing a common basis for harmonisation of arms export policies, a gradual process should be pursued. First, the exchange of information on the application of the 8 criteria within the Council should be intensified. Secondly, the adoption by Member States in the EU framework of a code of conduct concerning arms exports, which the incoming UK Presidency has indicated to be a priority, would be an important development. The resolution adopted by the European Paidiament in may 1997 in support of the Commission communication on defence industry invites the Commission to present a White Paper on the subject of arms export policy. The Commission intends to prepare such a White Paper formulating possible options for progress toward a common arms export policy, which could contribute to the establishment of an effective code of conduct. * ' In the case of co-operation programmes further progress could be achieved on the basis of some experiences, namely by following the principle whereby will apply the export rules of the country where the prime contractor is established or where the final assembly and the physical export takes place. V. 10 Structural funds In Agenda 2000, (EU-Bulletin Supplement 5/97) the Commission proposes a reform for the Structural Funds in the light of the new financial perspective (period 2000-2006): Three Objectives are foreseen under the new Structural Funds framework. In addition to Objective 1 which concerns the development and structural adjustment of regions lagging behind, a redefined Objective 2 will be created for other regions with structural problems. These are areas undergoing economic change (in industry or services), declining rural areas, crisis-hit areas dependent on the fishing industry or urban areas in difficulty. A limited number of significant areas should be identified in order to facilitate an integrated strategy for economic diversification. Objective 3 will concern the strategy for human resources outside these regions. 21 In Agenda 2000, the Commission does not foresee the continuation of a number of specific Community initiatives, including the one related to the reconversion of areas dependent on the defence, since these objectives could already be integrated in the afore mentioned programmes as such. Possible needs for diversification and conversion within the defence-related industry will therefore have to be properly considered when considering the new programmes for the next programming period. The new programmes supporting Objective 2 regions should focus on economic reconversion and diversification, including in regions heavily dependent on a single declining economic sector. For this reason specific attention should be given local development, environmental protection and the fight against social exclusion. In this context, regional reconversion linked to the defence industry may also be the subject of actions aimed at the economic and social reconversion of regions covered by Objective 2. A similar approach may be followed in the regions covered by Objective 1. Further, Objective 3 could possibly contribute in the context of the adaptation of workers to industrial change. innovation, professional education, to SME's and V. ll Taxation Indirect taxation In July 1996 the Commission published its suggested programme for a "common system" of VAT for the European Community (EC), COM 328(96) Final. To achieve this, the new system's essential characteristics must ensure that: - No distinction shall be made between domestic and intra-EC transactions; - All transactions shall be taxed in the EC on the basis of the origin principle, and; - A new mechanism to decide the place of supply of goods and services needs to be established; - The VAT rates shall be simplified. The Commission believes that the new system will benefit also to the defence industry. The Commission will in parallel secure a fuller implementation of the eighth directive. Direct taxation to taxation, the Commission adopted its new global approach As part of in November 1997 a Communication outlining a tax package on which it invited Member states to reach a political agreement. Part of this package is a request to Member states to make a political commitment to work towards the early adoption of a Directive to eliminate withholding taxes on interest and royalty payments between companies. Such a directive would eliminate an important barrier to transfers of capital and technology between companies, as these withholding taxes create obstacles for economic operators: they can involve time consuming formalities, result in cash flow losses, and sometimes lead to double taxation. The Commission's new proposal for a directive on interest and royalties can be expected in early 1998. & V. 12 Principles for market access Based on principles of comparable and effective access to markets, the Community should seek to remove obstacles to European exporters, including Customs duties. In the case of the US (with which the EU trade balance is in the ratio of 1 to 6) the issue might be raised , if European and American industries so decide, in the Transatlantic Business Dialogue or in the context of the New Transatlantic Agenda (the chapter on the new Transatlantic Marketplace). V. 13 Benchmarking In line with the Commission's industrial policy to promote benchmarking as a tool for increasing the competitiveness of European industry and spreading best practice, the Commission will consult industry and other relevant actors for a benchmarking exercise in certain areas of interest to the competitiveness of defence-related industries. Such an exercise could for example look at issues such as best practice for the utilisation of synergies between civil and military information technologies, best practice for the integration of civil and military standards or best practice concerning multilateral projects. V. 14 Enlargement The Commission will launch a study in order to better assess the situation of defence industries in the CEEC. The outcome of this study together with other relevant informations should be used as a basis for further analysing and reflecting upon the following topics: - - the potential of the defence and industrial base of Central and Eastern European countries and its impact on European industry. the relevance for and the best ways of promoting industrial co-operation. 21 VI. TIMETABLE FOR MAJOR ACTIONS PRESENTED IN THE ACTION PLAN (SUMMARY) Area Action Timing V. l Intra-Community transfers V. 2 European Company Statute V. 3 Public procurement V. 4 RTD V. 5 Standardisation V. 6 Customs duties V. 7 Innovation, transfer technology and SME's V. 8 Competition policy V. 9 Exports Dual-use - technologies Conventional armaments goods 1998 complementarity 1998-1999 and European • The Commission shall propose a 1998 simplified licensing regime Council decision Proposal of rules for procurement in 1998-1999 the defence sector Establishment of between national research programmes Finalisation of study. Draw up a work programme identify homogeneous standards programming. Commission initiatives arrangements within the Community Review proposal from 1988 on temporary suspensions on import duties system of for defence equipment adopt Commission End 1998 legislative End 1998 to End 1998 harmonise propose tariff and to Second semester 1998 • of Continue to support initiatives such Ongoing as : INTERPRISE, IBEX Take into account specificities of the Ongoing defence-related industry Competition assessments in I and - Report on the application of the First semester 1998 Dual-use regulation - White paper - Proposal for a code of conduct First semester 1998 In accordance with White Paper V. 10 Structural funds - Proposal for a general reform of First semester 1998 cohesion policy according Agenda 2000 to - Negotiation of these proposals in 2nd semester 1998 V. 11 Indirect Taxation Direct Taxation V. l2 Principles for market access V. l3 Benchmarking V. l4 Enlargement. new Between end of 1998 to - the interest and Early 1998 end of 1999 Ongoing the Council and in Parliament as well as consultation of the other institutions and bodies Implementation of regulation/framework Pursue Council discussions Propose directive on royalties Issue to be raised in the context of the During 1998-1999 the TABD if EU and US industries so decide or in the New Transatlantic Agenda The Commission will consult industry 1998-2000 and other relevant actors on a benchmarking exercise in the defence- related industry. - Finalisation of Study - Industrial impact assessment End 1998 1998-2000 10 s ISSN 0254-1475 COM(97) 583 final DOCUMENTS EN 06 10 01 15 Catalogue number : CB-CO-97-627-EN-C ISBN 92-78-27693-6 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg ou


title: KOMMISSIONENS FÖRORDNING (EG) nr 2410/97 av den 4 december 1997 om fastställande av schablonvärden vid import för bestämning av ingångspriset för vissa frukter och grönsaker

eurovoc_concepts:
agri-monetary policy
citrus fruit
fruit vegetable
import price
pip fruit


title: Ψήφισμα σχετικά με τα προβλήματα ανάπτυξης και τις διαρθρωτικές παρεμβάσεις στο Βέλγιο (C4-0107/97)

eurovoc_concepts:
Belgium
Flanders (Belgium)
Province of Hainault
Structural Funds
Walloon region (Belgium)
exchange parity
less-favoured region
regional aid

formats: html print


title: Proposition de règlement (CE) du Conseil répartissant pour l'année 1998 les quotas de captures entre les États membres pour les navires pêchant dans les eaux de la Lettonie

eurovoc_concepts:
EU Member State
Latvia
catch quota
fishing area
fishing vessel

text: COMMISSION DES COMMUNAUTES EUROPEENNES Bruxelles, le 04. 12. 1997 COM(97) 663 final Proposition de REGLEMENT (CE) DU CONSEIL répartissant pour Tannée 1998 les quotas de captures entre les États membres pour les navires péchant dans les eaux de la Lettonie (présentée par la Commission) '% "J; 1 J'*1 •f ' 5 '"' M. EXPOSÉ DES MOTIFS Les consultations entire la Communauté et la Lettonie ont eu lieu à Riga les 23 et 24 octobre 1997 et ont abouti à un relevé de conclusions définissant les droits de pêche réciproques pour 1998. Lesdites consultations se sont déroulées sur la base du nouvel accord concernant les relations en matière de pêche entre la Communauté européenne et la république de Lettonie, signé le 19 décembre 1996. L'arrangement en matière de pêche pour 1998 prévoit entre autres certains quotas de captures pour les navires de pêche communautaires opérant dans la zone de pêche de la Lettonie dans le cadre de l'échange de possibilités de pêche et de quotas d'accès réciproques. La présente proposition de règlement vise à répartir, pour l'année 1998, les quotas de captures entre les États membres pour les navires de la Communauté dans la zone de pêche de la Lettonie conformément à l'arrangement susvisé. En conséquence de l'acte d'adhésion de l'Autriche, de la Finlande et de la Suède à l'Union européenne, et notamment de son article 121 paragraphe 1 note de bas de page 9 du tableau, les États membres de la Communauté dans la composition qui était la sienne avant l'élargissement ont été dédommagés de la réduction de leur part du stock de cabillaud jusqu'à concurrence du niveau requis par la déclaration du Conseil. La Lettome reçoit une compensation financière d'un montant de 430 300 écus pour les quotas acquis dans ses eaux, conformément à l'article 4 de l'accord concernant les relations en matière de pêche entre la Communauté européenne et la république de Lettonie. Proposition de RÈGLEMENT (CE) Ne. „. J9È DU CONSEIL du ,„. décembre1997 répartissant pour Tannée 1998 les quotas de captures entre les États membres pour les navires péchant dans les eaux de la Lettonie LE CONSEIL DE L'UNION EUROPÉENNE, vu le traité instituant la Communauté européenne, vu le règlement (CEE) no 3760/92 du Conseil, du 20 décembre 1992, instituant un régime communautaire de la pêche et de l'aquaculture*1*, et notamment son article 8 paragraphe 4, vu la proposition de la Commission, considérant que, conformément à la procédure prévue par l'accord concernant les relations en matière de pêche entre la Communauté européenne et la république de Lettonie*2), et notamment ses articles 3 et 6, la Communauté et la Lettonie se sont consultées au sujet des droits de pêche réciproques en 1998 ainsi qu'au sujet de la gestion des ressources biologiques communes; considérant que, au cours de ces consultations, les délégations sont convenues de recommander à leurs autorités respectives de fixer certains quotas de captures au titre de l'année 1998 pour les navires de l'autre partie; » • ' considérant qu'il convient de prendre les mesures nécessaires pour donner suite aux résultats des consultations intervenues pour 1998 avec la Lettome; considérant que, pour assurer une gestion efficace de ces possibilités de captures disponibles dans les eaux de la Lettonie, il convient de répartir entre les États membres des quotas, conformément à l'article 8 du règlement (CEE) no 3760/92; considérant que les activités de pêche visées par le présent règlement sont soumises aux mesures de contrôle pertinentes prévues par le règlement (CEE) no 2847/93 du Conseil, du 12 octobre 1993, instituant un régime de contrôle applicable à la politique commune de la pêche*3); considérant que les conditions additionnelles pour la gestion interannuelle des totaux admissibles ejes captures et quotas, conformément aux dispositions de l'article 2 du règlement (CE) no 847/96 du ConseiK4), n'ont pas été convenues avec la Lettonie; considérant que, pour des raisons imperatives tenant à l'intérêt commun, le présent règlement sera applicable à compter du 1er janvier 1998, W JO n° L 389 du 31. 12. 1992, p. 1. Règlement modifié par l'acte d'adhésion de 1994. (2) JO n°L 332 du 20. 12. 1996, p. 1. (3) JOn°L'261 du 20. 10. 1993, p. 1. W JO no L 115 du 9. 5. 1996, p. 3. ••rr-y;fwv. y^rt^frr A ARRÊTÉ LE PRÉSENT RÈGLEMENT: Article premier Du 1er janvier au 31 décembre 1998, les navires battant pavillon d'un État membre sont autorisés à procéder à des captures à concurrence des quotas indiqués en annexe dans les eaux relevant de la juridiction de la Lettonie en matière de pêche. Article 2 La contribution financière prévue à l'article 4 de l'accord concernant les relations en matière de pêche entre la Communauté européenne et la république de Lettonie est fixée, pour la période visée à l'article 1er, à un montant de 430 300 écus à verser sur un compte désigné par la Lettonie. Les stocks visés à l'annexe ne sont pas soumis aux conditions fixées aux articles 2, 3 et 5 paragraphe 2 du règlement (CE) no 847/96. Article 3 Le présent règlement entre en vigueur le jour de sa publication au Journal officiel des Communautés européennes. Il est applicable à partir du 1er janvier 1998. Article 4 Le présent règlement est obligatoire dans tous ses éléments et directement applicable dans tout État membre. Fait à Bruxelles, le. décembre 1997. Par le Conseil Le président ANNEXE Répartition des quotas de captures de la Communauté dans les eaux de la Lettonie pour 1998 (en tonnes métriques poids vif; pour le saumon: en nombre d'individus) Espèces Division CIEM Quotas de captures de ia Communauté Quotas attribués aux États membres Cabillaud 111(d) 1050 Hareng 111(d) 1200 Saumon 111(d) 6 500 Sprat 111(d) 6 500 Danemark Finlande Allemagne Suède Danemark Finlande Allemagne Suède Danemark Finlande Allemagne Suède Danemark Finlande Allemagne Suède 390 170 175 315 570 0 430 200 2 530 2 430 280 1260 3 780 0 1005 1715 FICHE FINANCIÈRE 1. TITRE: Proposition de règlement du Conseil répartissant pour l'année 1998 des quotas de captures entre les États membres pour les navires péchant dans les eaux de la Lettonie. 2. LIGNE BUDGETAIRE CONCERNEE: B7-800 3. BASE JURIDIQUE: Article 8 paragraphe 4 du règlement (CEE) no 3760/92 du Conseil 4. DESCRIPTION: 4. 1 Objectif général: • • • maintenir et développer l'activité traditionnelle des pêcheurs communautaires dans les eaux de la Lettome; approvisionner le marché communautaire; et réduire l'effort de pêche dans les eaux communautaires. 4. 2 Période couverte: Année 1998 5. CLASSIFICATION DES DÉPENSES: 5. 1 DO 5. 2 CD 6. TYPE DE DÉPENSES: Compensation financière versée pour les possibilités de pêche dans les eaux de la Lettonie. 7. CONSÉQUENCES FINANCIÈRES: 430 300 écus La compensation financière visée à l'article 4 de l'accord a été négociée sur la base des prix moyens des débarquements effectués en 1996 dans les ports communautaires de la mer Baltique. Une déduction a été pratiquée afin de tenir compte de l'estimation des coûts d'exploitation de la flotte pour chaque espèce. 7. 1 Méthode de calcul: CABILLAUD SAUMON *!*W***W*l**>!X*i Quota obtenu (en tonnes) Prix moyens pondérés des débarquements 1996 (écu/tonne) 1400 908 32,5 2284 166,81 Valeur de marché (en écus) 1 271 200 Résultat négocié (%) en écus 25% 317 800 74 230 25% 18 558 200172 550 875 12,5% 25 020 12,5% 68 900 Compensation finale totale (article 4): 430 300 écus Prix moyen en écu/tonne: 47,11 DISPOSITIONS ANTI-FRAUDES: La contribution financière accordée par la Communauté est utilisée par la Lettonie pour le financement du Fonds letton du poisson et pour le développement de la coopération bilatérale et multilatérale dans le domaine de la pêche conformément à l'article 4 de l'accord. Le montant en est géré par l'Office national de la pêche du ministère de ragriculture de la république de Lettonie. ÉLÉMENTS D'ANALYSE COÛTS/AVANTAGES: La flotte communautaire de la mer Baltique a été gravement touchée par les réductions des possibilités de captures, dues essentiellement à des facteurs biologiques (faible salinité de l'eau, maladie M-74) et à la pollution de l'eau. Toute augmentation des possibilité de pêche au-delà des seuils de captures stratégiques actuels contribuera à éviter que la flotte, ainsi que les industries et services connexes à terre, ne s'effondrent et disparaissent Dans une certaine mesure, cela évitera aussi de devoir effectuer des paiements au titre de programmes de désarmement ou de programmes sociaux. L'expérience nous a montré que, comme en 1997, la Lettonie a utilisé la compensation financière principalement pour continuer d'améliorer la recherche scientifique sur les pêcheries et la formation des responsables de pêcheries. Cela a permis d'améliorer revaluation scientifique et l'application de la législation dans la 2011e de pêche de la Lettonie, tout en contribuant à une exploitation plus rationnelle des stocks, dans l'intérêt de toutes les parties concernées dans la mer Baltique. Les dépenses proposées sont prévues dans la planification budgétaire de la période concernée. to. DÉPENSES ADMINISTRATIVES: ion de la présente proposition personnel supplémentaire et n'entpaîne ne suppose pas que la Commission engage du de dépenses administratives supplémentaires. ISSN 0254-1491 COM(97) 663 final DOCUMENTS FR 03 11 14 N° de catalogue : CB-CO-97-680-FR-C ISBN 92-78-28644-3 Office des publications officielles des Communautés européennes L-2985 Luxembourg %


title: PERGUNTA ESCRITA n. 3932/97 do Deputado Sérgio RIBEIRO à Comissão. Bacia hidrográfica do rio Lis e da ribeira de Seiça - Portugal/Fundo de Coesão

eurovoc_concepts:
Cohesion Fund
Portugal
balance of payments assistance
environmental monitoring
hydrology
pollution control measures
water treatment
watercourse

formats: html pdf print

text: C 187/94 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias 16. 6. 98 Na(cid:152)o entende igualmente a Comissa(cid:152)o que as interdi(cid:231)o(cid:152)es de circular, tal como os recentes bloqueios, podem ter conseque(cid:136)ncias profundamente negativas para as empresas europeias, tornando necessa·ria a cria(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de uma rede de itinera·rios europeus para o transporte rodovia·rio (E-ways), a‘ semelhan(cid:231)a dos itinera·rios europeus para o transporte ferrovia·rio de mercadorias? Em caso afirmativo, tenciona a Comissa(cid:152)o apresentar a curto prazo propostas relativas a itinera·rios europeus para o transporte rodovia·rio de mercadorias? Resposta dada pelo Comissa·rio Kinnock em nome da Comissa(cid:152)o (28 de Janeiro de 1998) A Comissa(cid:152)o tem conhecimento dos problemas levantados pela falta de coordena(cid:231)a(cid:152)o das interdi(cid:231)o(cid:152)es de circular aplica·veis aos camio(cid:152)es que efectuam o transporte rodovia·rio de mercadorias na Unia(cid:152)o, tal como sublinhado pela pergunta do Senhor Deputado, e transmitiu as suas preocupa(cid:231)o(cid:152)es ao Conselho. Por conseguinte, a Comissa(cid:152)o tenciona apresentar uma proposta legislativa no segundo trimestre deste ano, a fim de definir regras claras e comuns, que devera(cid:152)o ser respeitadas pelos Estados-membros aquando da aplica(cid:231)a(cid:152)o das interdi(cid:231)o(cid:152)es de circula(cid:231)a(cid:152)o. (98/C 187/142) PERGUNTA ESCRITA P-3932/97 apresentada por Se·rgio Ribeiro (GUE/NGL) a‘ Comissa(cid:152)o (4 de Dezembro de 1997) Objecto: Bacia hidrogra·fica do rio Lis e da ribeira de Sei(cid:231)a › Portugal/Fundo de Coesa(cid:152)o Numa regia(cid:152)o com problemas graves no plano ambiental, a despolui(cid:231)a(cid:152)o da bacia hidrogra·fica que inclui o rio Lis (e o Lena) e da ribeira de Sei(cid:231)a (e outras ribeiras) tem grande prioridade. Tal tem sido reconhecido pelas autoridades locais e pelos governos centrais, o que justifica que tenha sido apresentada, segundo se julga, uma candidatura ao Fundo de Coesa(cid:152)o, num total de 7 milho(cid:152)es de contos de investimento destinados a‘ despolui(cid:231)a(cid:152)o dessa complexa rede hidrogra·fica. Pergunto a‘ Comissa(cid:152)o quando foi apresentada a candidatura, qual o andamento desse processo de candidatura e se e· poss(cid:14)·vel conhecer-se alguma primeira indica(cid:231)a(cid:152)o sobre um calenda·rio de avalia(cid:231)a(cid:152)o e de decisa(cid:152)o. Resposta da Comissa·ria Monika Wulf-Mathies em nome da Comissa(cid:152)o (6 de Janeiro de 1998) A Comissa(cid:152)o recebeu, em 20 de Novembro de 1997, um pedido de co-financiamento, pelo Fundo de Coesa(cid:152)o, da primeira fase de um projecto de despolui(cid:231)a(cid:152)o integrada das bacias hidrogra·ficas do rio Lis e da ribeira de Sei(cid:231)a, promovido pela Associa(cid:231)a(cid:152)o dos Munic(cid:14)·pios da Alta Estremadura, nas regio(cid:152)es do Pinhal Litoral e do Me·dio Tejo (distritos de Leiria e Santare·m). Esse pedido inclui diversos subprojectos que preve(cid:136)em a constru(cid:231)a(cid:152)o ou a adapta(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de seis esta(cid:231)o(cid:152)es de tratamento de a·guas usadas e de, aproximadamente, 200 quilo·metros de emissa·rios, a realizar antes de 31 de Dezembro de 1999. A Comissa(cid:152)o instruira· o processo em questa(cid:152)o com base na avalia(cid:231)a(cid:152)o te·cnica e econo·mica do projecto, nas disponibilidades financeiras do Fundo de Coesa(cid:152)o relativamente a Portugal e nas prioridades definidas pela Comissa(cid:152)o e pelo Estado-membro


title: SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE Nr. 3933/97 von Sören WIBE an die Kommission. Unrichtige Veterinärbescheinigungen

eurovoc_concepts:
France
Sweden
animal disease
health certificate
health control
import (EU)
meat
public health
veterinary legislation

text: 16. 6. 98 DE Amtsblatt der Europa¤ischen Gemeinschaften C 187/95 (98/C 187/143) SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE P-3933/97 von So¤ren Wibe (PSE) an die Kommission (4. Dezember 1997) Betrifft: Unrichtige Veterina¤rbescheinigungen Die schwedische Lebensmittelbeho¤rde hat 569 aus EU-La¤ndern importierte Fleischlieferungen untersucht. Zu 75% dieser Fleischlieferungen lag eine tiera¤rztliche Bescheinigung, vor, da(cid:223) das Fleisch salmonellenfrei ist. Bei der Untersuchung von 57 der mit Veterina¤rbescheinigung ausgestatteten Posten stellte es sich heraus, da(cid:223) zwo¤lf Salmonellen aufwiesen. Sieben von acht untersuchten Posten aus Frankreich hatten Salmonellen. Es sollte als Mindestvoraussetzung gelten, da(cid:223) in einem EU-Mitgliedstaat ausgestellte Veterina¤rbescheinigun- gen korrekt sind. Der Rat verwies in einer Debatte am 19. 11. 1997 auf die Kommission, was diesbezu¤gliche Ma(cid:223)nahmen anbelangt. Kann ein Mitgliedstaat regelma¤(cid:223)ige Kontrollen von aus einem anderen Mitgliedstaat eingefu¤hrten Fleischlieferungen einfu¤hren, wenn schwerwiegende Regelwidrigkeiten auftreten, wie die, auf die wir oben hingewiesen haben? Kann Schweden Ma(cid:223)nahmen ergreifen, die den freien Warenverkehr fu¤r Lebensmittel einschra¤nken, um seine Bevo¤lkerung vor Salmonellenvergiftungen zu schu¤tzen? Antwort von Herrn Fischler im Namen der Kommission (19. Januar 1998) Zur Durchfu¤hrung des innergemeinschaftlichen Handels mit tierischen Erzeugnissen wie frischem Fleisch entha¤lt die Richtlinie 89/662/EWG zur Regelung der veterina¤rrechtlichen Kontrollen im innergemeinschaftli- chen Handel im Hinblick auf den gemeinsamen Binnenmarkt (1) Vorschriften fu¤r die Kontrollen am Ursprungs- und Bestimmungsort und fu¤r etwaige Folgema(cid:223)nahmen im Falle unbefriedigender Kontrollergebnisse. Gema¤(cid:223) Artikel 3 der genannten Richtlinie (Kontrollen im Ursprungsland) sorgen die Mitgliedstaaten dafu¤r, da(cid:223) nur diejenigen Erzeugnisse fu¤r den Handel bestimmt sind, die im Einklang mit der Gemeinschaftsregelung fu¤r die betreffende Bestimmung erzeugt und kontrolliert wurden. Die Anforderungen fu¤r die Versendung von frischem Fleisch nach Schweden sind mit dem Beitrittsvertrag gemeinschaftsrechtlich verankert worden. Die Kontrollen im Bestimmungsland sind Gegenstand der Artikel 5 bis 8 dieser Richtlinie. In Artikel 5 Absatz 1 Buchstabe a) sind die Grundregeln fu¤r diese Kontrollen festgelegt, die nichtdiskriminierend sein mu¤ssen und im Stichprobeverfahren durchzufu¤hren sind. Artikel 7 Absatz 1 Buchstabe b) regelt den Verbleib der Ware, falls sie die Bedingungen der Gemeinschaftsrichtlinie nicht erfu¤llt, und setzt fu¤r ihre Ru¤cksendung die Genehmigung des Landes voraus, in dem der Ursprungsbetrieb liegt. Befu¤rchtet der Bestimmungsmitgliedstaat, da(cid:223) die Kontrollen am Ursprungsort nicht ausreichend sind, so sucht er zusammen mit dem Versandmitgliedstaat nach Mitteln und Wegen, um Abhilfe zu schaffen, gegebenenfalls auch durch eine Besichtigung vor Ort. Fu¤hren diese Ma(cid:223)nahmen zu keinem Ergebnis, so kann der Bestimmungsmitgliedstaat gema¤(cid:223) Artikel 8 der Richtlinie die Kommission entsprechend unterrichten, die ihrerseits Ermittlungen vornehmen kann. Es ist demnach Sache der schwedischen Beho¤rden, die beschriebenen Verfahren einzuleiten. In bezug auf das vom Herrn Abgeordneten angesprochene Kernproblem › d. h. die Feststellung (in Schweden), da(cid:223) Schlachtko¤r- per trotz Garantie des Versandlandes in Form einer spezifischen Bescheinigung Salmonellen aufweisen › ist es fu¤r die Kommission zur Zeit schwierig, eine endgu¤ltige Position zu beziehen, weil die Ursachen fu¤r diese Kontaminationen verschiedene Gru¤nde › beispielsweise Fehler bei der Kontrolle am Ursprungsort, Kontami- nierung wa¤hrend des Transports und beim Manipulieren der Ware oder Unvereinbarkeit der Kontrollmethoden › haben kann. Im Rahmen des Binnenmarktes mu¤ssen nach Auffassung der Kommission die gemeinschaftsrechtlich vorgeschriebenen Kontrollen vor einseitigen Ma(cid:223)nahmen der Mitgliedstaaten Vorrang haben. Diese Regel gilt auch fu¤r den Schutz gegen Salmonellen. (1) ABl. L 395 vom 30. 12. 1989


title: Resolução sobre os problemas de desenvolvimento e as intervenções estruturais na Bélgica (C4-0107/97)


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3934/97 by Reimer BÖGE to the Commission. BSE - classification of Member States into differing risk areas

eurovoc_concepts:
animal disease
animal health
epidemic
health control
health policy
health risk
public health
veterinary inspection

text: C 187/96 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 16. 6. 98 (98/C 187/144) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA P-3934/97 fr(cid:229)n Reimer Bo¤ge (PPE) till kommissionen (4 december 1997) A¤mne: BSE: Indelning av medlemsstaterna i olika riskomr(cid:229)den Kan kommissionen meddela hur den anser att Europeiska unionens medlemsstater skall delas in vad ga¤ller kriterierna fr(cid:229)n Internationella byr(cid:229)n fo¤r beka¤mpande av smittsamma husdjurssjukdomar (IOE) i BSE-fria regioner, regioner med l(cid:229)g och regioner med ho¤g BSE-risk? Vilka brister anser kommissionen finns i de medlemsstater som › p(cid:229) grundval av IOE-standarderna › definierats som omr(cid:229)den med l(cid:229)g risk och som kommissionen da¤rfo¤r inte kan anse vara omr(cid:229)den med noll-risk? Svar fr(cid:229)n Franz Fischler p(cid:229) kommissionens va¤gnar (19 januari 1998) Kapitel 3. 2. 13 i OIE-koden (Internationella byr(cid:229)n fo¤r beka¤mpande av smittsamma husdjurssjukdomar) som handlar om bovin spongiform encefalopati (BSE) anger tre kategorier av la¤nder: de som a¤r fria fr(cid:229)n BSE, de som har en ho¤g fo¤rekomst av sjukdomen och de la¤nder som har en l(cid:229)g fo¤rekomst. Koden klassificerar inte la¤nder p(cid:229) grundval av risk. Fo¤rekomst av BSE i ett land a¤r inte samma sak som risk fo¤r BSE. Fo¤rekomsten besta¤ms genom den noggrannhet med vilken man uppta¤cker och rapporterar fall av sjukdomen, medan risken fo¤r att bli smittad eller fo¤r o¤verfo¤ring av BSE besta¤ms genom de (cid:229)tga¤rder som vidtas fo¤r att fo¤rhindra eller eliminera smittan. Ett land som inte har vidtagit fullgoda (cid:229)tga¤rder fo¤r att fo¤rhindra anva¤ndning av infekterat foder och som inte har n(cid:229)gon effektiv kontroll av BSE kan da¤rmed ha rapporterat att inga fall av BSE finns, men i detta land kan risken vara sto¤rre a¤n i ett land som har rapporterat ett f(cid:229)tal fall och da¤r effektiva (cid:229)tga¤rder har vidtagits fo¤r att handskas med dem. Vetenskapliga veterina¤rkommitte·n angav i sitt yttrande av den 21 oktober 1996 att den (cid:148)betraktar varje risk fr(cid:229)n BSE som mycket la¤gre i andra medlemsstater a¤n i UK, men risken a¤r inte noll(cid:148). Alla medlemsstater a¤r fria att framla¤gga bevis till kommissionen om de o¤nskar visa att de har en sa¤rskilt god sta¤llning na¤r det ga¤ller risk fr(cid:229)n BSE. Flera la¤nder har redan gjort detta och deras inlagor kommer att granskas av beho¤rig vetenskaplig kommitte·. Kommissionen kan inte inta n(cid:229)gon st(cid:229)ndpunkt na¤r det ga¤ller situationen i en enskild medlemsstat fo¤rra¤n den har mottagit det vetenskapliga utl(cid:229)tandet. Som ett fo¤rsta steg h(cid:229)ller styrkommitte·n nu p(cid:229) att fo¤rbereda en harmoniserad fo¤rteckning o¤ver kriterier som kommer att anva¤ndas vid utva¤rdering av alla framsta¤llningar. (98/C 187/145) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-3936/97 fr(cid:229)n Anita Pollack (PSE) till kommissionen (12 december 1997) A¤mne: Livsmedelshygien Nu na¤r kommissionen har organiserat om ansvaret fo¤r livsmedelssa¤kerhet som svar p(cid:229) parlamentets p(cid:229)tryckningar efter BSE-krisen, h(cid:229)ller kommissionen med om att det a¤r dags att utarbeta det efterla¤ngtade ramdirektivet om livsmedelshygien och na¤r kommer detta i s(cid:229) fall att ske? Svar fr(cid:229)n Martin Bangemann p(cid:229) kommissionens va¤gnar (27 januari 1998) Kommissionen vill p(cid:229)minna ledamoten om r(cid:229)dets direktiv 93/43/EEG av den 14 juni 1993 om livsmedelshygi- en (1). I artikel 1. 1 i detta anges att direktiv syftar till faststa¤llande av (cid:148)allma¤nna regler fo¤r livsmedelshygien(cid:148)


title: ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟΣ (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2412/97 ΤΗΣ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗΣ της 4ης Δεκεμβρίου 1997 για καθορισμό των επιστροφών που εφαρμόζονται κατά την εξαγωγή της βύνης

eurovoc_concepts:
export refund
malt


title: KOMMISSIONENS FORORDNING (EF) Nr. 2410/97 af 4. december 1997 om faste importværdier med henblik på fastsættelsen af indgangsprisen for visse frugter og grøntsager


title: Förslag till rådets förordning (EG) om fördelning för år 1998 av vissa fångstkvoter mellan medlemsstaterna för fartyg som fiskar i färöiska vatten

eurovoc_concepts:
Denmark
Faroe Islands
authorised catch
catch quota
fishing rights

text: EUROPEISKA GEMENSKAPERNAS KOMMISSION Bryssel den 04. 12. 1997 KOM(97)662 slutlig Förslag till RÅDETS FÖRORDNING ŒG) n fördelning för år 1998 av vissa fångstkvoter mellan medlemsstaterna för fartyg som fiskar färöiska, vatten (framlagt av kommissionen) MOTIVERING De överläggningar som hölls mellan gemenskapen och Färöarna i Törshavn den 13 och 14 oktober 1997 resulterade i ett avtal om ömsesidiga fiskerättigheter för 1998. I avtalet föreskrivs biand annat vissa fångstkvoter för gemenskapsfartyg i Färöarnas vatten. Syftet med detta förslag till förordning är att tilldela medlemsstaterna de kvoter som är tillgängliga 1998 för gemenskapsfartyg som fiskar i Färöarnas vatten i enlighet med ovannämnda avtal. Z Förslag till RÅDETS FÖRORDNING (EG) nr. /98 av den. december 1997 om fördelning för år 1998 av vissa fångstkvoter mellan medlemsstaterna för fartyg som fiskar i färöiska vatten EUROPEISKA UNIONENS RÅD HAR ANTAGIT DENNA FÖRORDNING med beaktande av Fördraget om upprättandet av Europeiska gemenskapen, med beaktande av rådets förordning (EEG) nr 3760/92 av den 20 december 1992 om ett gemenskapssystem för fiske och vattenbruk1, särskilt artikel 8. 4 i denna, med beaktande av kommissionens förslag, och med beaktande av följande: I enlighet med det förfarande som föreskrivs i fiskeavtalet mellan Europeiska ekonomiska gemenskapen, å ena sidan, och den danska regeringen och Färöarnas landsstyre, å den andra sidan, har de båda parterna samrått om de ömsesidiga fiskerättigheterna för 1998. Dessa samråd har lett till att de båda parterna har enats om en överenskommelse för år 1998 enligt vilket gemenskapsfartyg tilldelas vissa fångstkvoter i färöiska fiskezonen. För att säkerställa att de tillgängliga fiskemöjligheterna förvaltas effektivt bör de fördelas mellan medlemsstaterna som kvoter i enlighet med artikel 8 i förordning (EEG) nr 3760/92. De kontrollåtgärder som avses i rådets förordning (EEG) nr 2847/93 av den 12 oktober 1993 om införande av ett kontrollsystem för den gemensamma fiskeripolitiken2 skall tillämpas på de fiskeaktiviteter som omfattas av denna förordning. Överenskommelser om ytterligare villkor för förvaltning av totala tillåtna fångstmängder (TAC) och kvoter med fördelning mellan åren i enlighet med artikel 2 i rådets förordning (EG) nr 847/96-1 träffades inte med Färöarna. Av lungt vägande skäl av gemensamt intresse skall denna förordning tillämpas från och med den 1 januari 19l)8. 1 EGT nr L 389, 31. 12. 1992, s. 1. Förordningen ändrad genom 1994 års anslutningsakt. 2 EGT nr L 261, 20. 10. 1993, s. 1. 3 EGT nr L 115, 9. 5. 1996, s. 3. 3 HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE. Artikel 1 Från och med den 1 januari till och med den 31 december 1998 skall fångster som görs av fartyg som för en gemenskapsstats flagg i vatten som faller under Färöarnas fiskej urisdiktion, i enlighet med överenskommelsen om ömsesidiga fiskerättigheter för 1998 mellan gemenskapen och Färöarna inte överskrida de kvoter som anges i bilagan. Artikel 2 De fiskekvoter som anges i bilagan skall inte vara underkastade villkoren i artiklarna 2, 3 och 5. 2 i förordning (EG) nr 847/96. Denna förordning träder i kraft samma dag som den offentliggörs i Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning. Den skall tillämpas från och med den 1 januari 1998. Artikel 3 Denna förordning är till alla delar bindande och direkt tillämplig i alla medlemsstater. Utfärdad i Bryssel den 1997. På rådets vägnar Ordförande M BILAGA Fördelning av gemenskapens fångstkvoter i färöiska vatten för år 1998 i enlighet med artikel 1 (ungefärlig färskvikt i ton) - HH ÏCES- område Gemenskapens fangstkvoter Kvoter fördelade pk medlemsstater Torsk, kolja Vbl 500 Gråsej Vb 2 500 Kungsfisk Vb 7 000 Birkelånga, långa Vb 3 600 O) Blåvitling Vb 25 000 Plattfisk Vb 1000' (2) Frankrike Tyskland Förenade kungariket Belgien Frankrike Tyskland Nederländerna Förenade kungariket Belgien Frankrike Tyskland Förenade kungariket Frankrike Tyskland Förenade kungariket Danmark Frankrike Tyskland Nederländerna Förenade kungariket Frankrike Tyskland Förenade kungariket Makrill Andra arter Vb Vb 3 270 Danmark 760(3) ¥f rankrike Tyskland Förenade kungariket 60 10 430 50 1 510 310 50 580 50 435 6 440 75 2 340 1055 205 11 000 3 000 11000 140 180 680 3 270 275 305 180 in (2) (3) Bifångster av skoläst och dolkfisk skall räknas av från kvoten. Inbegripet liten hälleflundra. Utom fiskearter utan kommersiellt värde. r ISSN 1024-4506 KOM(97) 662 slutlig DOKUMENT SV 03 11 14 Katalognummer : CB-C0-97-679-SV-C ISBN 92-78-28638-9 Byrån för Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella publikationer L-2985 Luxemburg C


title: KOMMISSIONENS FORORDNING (EF) Nr. 2412/97 af 4. december 1997 om fastsættelse af eksportrestitutionerne for malt


title: Proposta di regolamento (CE) del Consiglio che ripartisce tra gli Stati membri per il 1998 i contingenti di cattura per le navi che pescano nelle acque della Lettonia

text: COMMISSIONE DELLE COMUNITÀ' EUROPEE •ù it ir it it il Bruxelles, 04. 12. 1997 COM(97) 663 def. Proposta di REGOLAMENTO (CE) DEL CONSIGLIO che ripartisce tra gli Stati membri per il 1998 i contingenti di cattura per le navi che pescano neiie acque delia Lettonia (presentata dalla Commissione) RELAZIONE La Comunità e la Lettonia si sono consultate il 23 e 24 ottobre 1997 a Riga, mettendo a punto un verbale concordato che definisce i regimi reciproci di pesca per il 1998. Tali consultazioni si sono svolte sulla base del nuovo accordo sulle relazioni nel settore della pesca tra la Comunità europea e la Repubblica lettone, firmato a Bruxelles il 19 dicembre 1996. Il regime di pesca per il 1998 prevede, tra l'altro, l'attribuzione di alcuni contingenti di cattura per i pescherecci comunitari operanti nella zona di pesca della Lettonia nel quadro dello scambio di possibilità di pesca e delle disposizioni sul reciproco accesso. Scopo della presente proposta di regolamento è di ripartire tra gli Stati membri i contingenti disponibili nel 1998, in virtù del summenzionato accordo, per navi da pesca della Comunità che operano nella zona lettone. In conseguenza dell'atto di adesione dell'Austria, della Finlandia e della Svezia all'Unione europea e in particolare dell'articolo 121, paragrafo 1, nota 9 della tabella, gli Stati membri della Comunità, nella sua composizione precedente all'ampliamento, sono stati compensati per la diminuzione della loro quota di merluzzo bianco fino al livello richiesto dalla dichiarazione del Consiglio. La Lettonia riceve, per i contingenti ottenuti dalla Comunità nelle sue acque, un corrispettivo finanziario di 430. 300 ECU in conformità dell'articolo 4 dell'accordo sulle relazioni nel settore della pesca tra la Comunità europea e la Repubblica lettone. Proposta di REGOLAMENTO (CE) N /98 DEL CONSIGLIO del. dicembre 1997 che ripartisce tra gli Stati membri per il Ì998 i contingenti di cattura per le navi che pescano nelle acque della Lettonia IL CONSIGLIO DELL'UNIONE EUROPEA, visto il trattato che istituisce la Comunità europea, visto il regolamento (CEE) n. 3760/92 del Consiglio, del 20 dicembre 1992, che istituisce un regime comunitario della pesca e dell'acquacoltura1, in particolare l'articolo 8, paragrafo 4, vista la proposta della Commissione, considerando che, secondo la procedura prevista dall'accordo sulle le relazioni nel settore della pesca tra la Comunità europea e la Repubblica lettone2, in particolare dagli articoli 3 e 6, la Comunità e la Lettonia si sono consultate sui reciproci diritti di pesca nel 1998 nonché sulla gestione delle risorse biologiche comuni; considerando che durante le consultazioni di cui trattasi le delegazioni hanno concordato di raccomandare alle rispettive autorità di fissare per il 1998 determinati contingenti di pesca per le navi dell'altra parte; considerando che è opportuno prendere le misure necessarie per mettere in applicazione, per l'anno 1998, i risultati delle consultazioni con la Lettonia; considerando che, per garantire una gestione efficace di queste possibilità di cattura disponibili nelle acque della Lettonia, è opportuno ripartire dei contingenti tra gli Stati membri, in conformità dell'articolo 8 del regolamento (CEE) n. 3760/92; considerando che le attività di pesca contemplate nel presente regolamento sono soggette alle misure di controllo previste dal regolamento (CEE) n. 2847/93 del Consiglio, del 12 ottobre 1993, che istituisce un regime di controllo applicabile nell'ambito della politica comune della pesca3; considerando che non erano state concordate con la Lettonia condizioni complementari per la gestione annuale dei TAC e dei contingenti, secondo quanto previsto dall'articolo 2 del regolamento (CE) n. 847/96 del Consiglio4; considerando che, per ragioni imperative di interesse comune, il presente regolamento va applicato a partire dal 1 ° gennaio ,1998, 1 GU L 389 del 31. 12. 1992, pag. 1. Regolamento modificato dall'atto di adesione del 1994. 2 3 4 GU L 332 del 20. 12. 1996, pag. 1. GU L 261 del 20. 10. 1993, pag. 1. GU L 115 del 9. 5. 1996, pag. 3. HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO: Articolo 1 Dal 1° gennaio al 31 dicembre 1998, le catture che le navi battenti bandiera di uno Stato membro sono autorizzate ad effettuare nelle acque soggette alla giurisdizione della Lettonia in materia di pesca sono limitate ai contingenti fissati nell'allegato. Articolo 2 Il contributo finanziario di cui all'articolo 4 dell'accordo sulle relazioni nel settore pesca tra la Comunità europea e la Lettonia, pagabile su un conto indicato dalla Lettonia per il periodo menzionato all'articolo 1, è fissato a 430. 300 ecu. Agli stock elencati nell'allegato non si applicano le condizioni di cui all'articolo 2, all'articolo 3 e all'articolo 5, paragrafo 2 del regolamento (CE) n. 847/96. Articolo 3 Articolo 4 Il presente regolamento entra in vigore il giorno della pubblicazione sulla Gazzetta Ufficiale delle Comunità europee. Esso si applica a decorrere dal 1° gennaio 1998. Il presente regolamento è obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri. Fatto a Bruxelles, il Per il Consiglio Il Presidente ALLEGATO Ripartizione dei contingenti di cattura della Comunità nelle acque della Lettonia per il 1998 (in tonnellate di pesce vivo; per il salmone: numero di singoli pesci) Specie Divisione Contingenti di cattura Contingenti assegnati CIE3VÏ della Comunità agli Stati membri Merluzzo bianco 111(d) 1. 050 Aringa 111(d) Salmone 111(d) Spratto 111(d) 1. 200 6. 500 6. 500 Danimarca Finlandia Germania Svezia Danimarca Finlandia Germania Svezia Danimarca Finlandia Germania Svezia Danimarca Finlandia Germania Svezia 390 170 175 315 570 0 430 200 2. 530 2. 430 280 1. 260 3. 780 0 1. 005 1. 715 SCHEDA FINANZIARIA 1. DENOMINAZIONE DELL'AZIONE: Proposta di regolamento del Consiglio che ripartisce tra gli Stati membri per il 1998 i contingenti di cattura per le navi che pescano nelle acque della Lettonia. 2. LINEA DI BILANCIO: B7-800 3. 4. BASE GIURIDICA: Articolo 8, paragrafo 4 del regolamento (CEE) n. 3760/92 DESCRIZIONE DELL'AZIONE: 4. 1 Obiettivo generale: • • • mantenere e sviluppare l'attività tradizionale dei pescatori comunitari nelle acque della Lettonia; approvvigionare il mercato comunitario; ridurre lo sforzo di pesca nelle acque comunitarie. 4. 1 Periodo previsto per l'azione: 1998 5. CLASSIFICAZIONE DELLE SPESE: 5. 1. SO 5. 2. SD 6. NATURA DELLA SPESA: Compensazione finanziaria corrisposta per le possibilità di pesca nelle acque della Lettonia. 7. INCIDENZA FINANZIARIA: 430. 300 ecu La compensazione finanziaria prevista all'articolo 4 dell'accordo è stata negoziata sulla base dei prezzi medi di sbarco rilevati nel 1996 nei porti comunitari del Baltico. È stata effettuata una detrazione per tener conto dei costi d'esercizio della flotta per ciascuna delle specie. 7. 1. Metodo di calcolo MERLUZZO SALMONE ARINGA SPRATTO BIANCO 1. 400 32,5 1. 200 6. 500 908 2. 284 166,81 84,75 Contingente ottenuto (in tonnellate) Media ponderata dei prezzi di sbarco 1996 (ecu/t) Valore commerciale (in ecu) 1. 271. 200 Contributo negoziato (%) in ecu 25% 317. 800 74. 230 25% 18. 558 200. 172 550. 875 12,5% 25. 020 12,5% 68. 900 Compensazione finanziaria totale (articolo 4): 430. 300 ecu Prezzo medio ecu/t: 47,11 DISPOSIZIONI ANTIFRODE: Il contributo finanziario concesso dalla Comunità sarà utilizzato dalla Lettonia per finanziare il Fondo lettone per la pesca nonché lo sviluppo della cooperazione bilaterale e multilaterale nel settore alieutico, conformemente all'articolo 4 dell'accordo. Esso sarà gestito dal Consiglio nazionale della pesca del Ministero dell'agricoltura della Repubblica lettone. ELEMENTI D'ANALISI COSTO-EFFICACIA: La flotta comunitaria nel Mar Baltico ha gravemente risentito delle riduzioni delle possibilità di cattura, dovute principalmente a fattori biologici (la bassa salinità dell'acqua e la malattia M-74) e all'inquinamento dell'acqua. Qualsiasi incremento delle possibilità di pesca rispetto all'attuale livello critico delle catture contribuirà ad evitare il collasso e la scomparsa della flotta, delle industrie connesse e dei servizi a terra. Ciò renderà inoltre inutili, in una certa misura, i contributi previsti nell'ambito di regimi di fermo o di misure a carattere sociale. L'esperienza passata ha dimostrato che la compensazione finanziaria corrisposta per le stesse finalità nel 1997 è stata utilizzata dalla Lettonia soprattutto per migliorare costantemente la ricerca scientifica nel campo della pesca e la formazione di responsabili del settore. Ciò consente una migliore valutazione scientifica e un maggior controllo sull'applicazione delle misure nella zona di pesca della Lettonia e contribuisce quindi ad uno sfruttamento più razionale degli stock nel Mar Baltico, a beneficio di tutte le parti interessate. Le spese di cui trattasi sono previste nella programmazione di bilancio per il "periodo ih oggetto. 10. SPESE AMMINISTRATIVE: La proposta non comporta nuovi posti nell'organico della Commissione né spese amministrative supplementari. 1 ISSN 0254-1505 COM(97) 663 def. DOCUMENTI IT 03 11 14 N. di catalogo : CB-CO-97-680-IT-C ISBN 92-78-28645-1 Ufficio delle pubblicazioni ufficiali delle Comunità europee L-2985 Lussemburgo 8