eurovoc_concepts:
free movement of goods
import
motor vehicle
tax-free allowance
vehicle registration

text: COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 10. 02. 1998 COM(1998) 30 final 98/0025 (CNS) Proposal for a Council Directive governing the tax treatment of private motor vehicles moved permanently to another Member State in connection with a transfer of residence or used temporarily in a Member State other than that in which they are registered. (presented by the Commission) EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM I. INTRODUCTION: 1. 2. 3. The proposed directive is intended to replace Directive 83/182/EEC on tax exemptions within the Community for certain means of transport imported into one Member State from another1 and Directive 83/183/EEC on tax exemptions applicable to permanent imports from a Member State of the personal property of individuals2, as amended by Directive 89/604/EEC3. It therefore has two main objectives: firstly, to consolidate and update the provisions of the two directives being replaced in the light of the internal market taxation rules and, secondly, to extend their provisions to address problems encountered with their application and to fit in with internal market requirements and expectations on the freedom of movement. The proposed directive does not seek to change radically the underlying concepts of the directives being replaced. It does, however, attempt to address situations where the existing rules regarding liability to tax provided for by those directives are considered to be too limited in the context of the single market, where they give rise to unreasonable administrative burdens for individuals and where, in the past, they have been interpreted in an excessively restrictive manner by Member States. It should be stressed that, on a general level, vehicle taxes have not been, the subject of rules aimed at approximation at a and are not currently, Community level, and reside largely within the competence of the Member States. The wide differences in practice between Member States in this area have been clearly identified in the review of vehicle taxation which has recently been taxation carried out by the Commission's Directorate-General (DGXXI). Insofar as this proposal lays down certain conditions under which Member States may not impose vehicle taxes, it is to be stressed that this should not be taken as implying that, in other cases, there is an obligation on Member States to introduce or to impose vehicle taxes. indirect for In addition to the considerations mentioned above, the proposed directive is intended to reflect more accurately the systems of taxation of motor vehicles applied by Member States since 1 January, 1993. Since that date, the internal market rules prohibit the use of frontier formalities in the collection of such taxes, and luxury VAT rates are no longer permitted. Consequently, Member States largely converted their excise duties on motor vehicles into registration taxes, or in some cases introduced new taxes or modified existing ones to compensate for VAT rate reductions. The proposal aims to ensure that these new taxes and charges introduced on or after 1 January 1993 come within the scope of measures aimed at avoiding double taxation. References to exemption from VAT are no longer necessary, as under the VAT rules applying since 1 January 1993 VAT is not payable in connection with transfer of residence or temporary use of vehicles in another Member State. The application of the existing directives has 1 2 3 O. J. No. L 105, 23. 4. 83, p. 59. O. J. No. L 105, 23. 4. 83, p. 64. O. J. No. L 348, 29. 11. 89, p. 28. already been repealed for VAT purposes by Article 2 of Directive 91/680/EEC4. Furthermore, the scope of the proposed directive is being limited to motor vehicles, reflecting the fact that, in practise, they are the sole type of property subject to taxation and requiring express rules forbidding the imposition of taxation in certain cases. Finally, it is proposed that special rules regarding taxation of vehicles which move between Member States in connection with marriage or inheritance are no longer necessary. 4. The changes proposed acknowledge that obstacles to free movement of privately owned vehicles from one Member State to another are amongst the most sensitive issues for individuals in the Community. Obstacles to such movement, be they fiscal or otherwise, can in effect be obstacles to the free movement of persons, given the level of use of the motor car as a preferred means of transport. At present such obstacles, often in the form of imposition of double taxation, continue to exist despite the expectations created by the advent of the single market. The need for such a proposal has been highlighted by a steady increase in the number of complaints by citizens to the European Commission, corresponding increases in the volume of petitions to the European Parliament and, most recently, by calls from the High Level Panel on the Free Movement of Persons, chaired by Mrs. Simone Veil, for solutions to eliminate cases of double taxation of vehicles. 5. On the detail of the proposed changes, where such exist, the overall objectives are to address situations which have been the subject of repeated complaints to Parliament and to the Commission, to expressly state in the Directive the outcome of a number of recent judgements of the Court of Justice, and generally to bring the tax treatment of vehicles which accompany private individuals moving from one Member State to another more in line with the concept and principles of the single market. 6. The measures proposed cover two broad categories. Firstly, in the case of transfers of residence, it is proposed that Member States should not impose registration taxes, or similar taxes, on vehicles brought into their territory by individuals who are transferring their place of residence to their territory from another Member State. This broadly corresponds, in its effect, to the aim of Directive 83/183/EEC, insofar as that directive provided for an exemption from taxes on the importation of motor vehicle in connection with a transfer of residence, with the significant exception that Directive 83/183/EEC did not apply to registration taxes. 7. As regards temporary movements, the main thrust of the proposals is to ensure a satisfactory continuation of the right of an individual to use a vehicle temporarily in a Member State other than that in which he resides, as provided for in Directive 83/182/EEC. The key element here is the right to use a vehicle for a period of up to six months in any twelve month period. A number of additional elements are being introduced, such as greater freedom to use rental cars in Member States other than those where they are registered, the right of family members to use the vehicle, and greater flexibility concerning the rights of O. J. No. L 376, 31. 12. 91, p. 1. persons who work in a Member State other than that where they reside and vehicles provided by employers. The proposal also envisages a greater onus on the competent authorities of Member States to communicate bilaterally in the event of a dispute concerning a person's alleged place of residence, and emphasises that, in cases where national law is infringed, any consequent action or sanction must be proportionate. In subsidiarity terms, an initiative is necessary at Community level to ensure that, where taxes connected with motor vehicles exist in Member States, there is a common set of rules governing the non-imposition of such taxes in certain well- defined cases. This is necessary to facilitate movement of persons within the Community and to avoid double taxation. The proposal does not seek to harmonise the taxes which Member States choose to implement in relation to motor vehicles. Furthermore, it does not impede the right of Member States to introduce or modify such taxes, nor does it undermine national measures to It represents what the ensure the satisfactory collection of such taxes. Commission considers to be the minimum level of regulation at Community level to be consistent with the principles of the single market. Member States are free to apply more liberal rules, if they see fit. II. EXPLANATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE PROPOSED DIRECTIVE: TITLE I General provisions. Article 1. 1. Article 1 describes the situations in which Member States shall not impose taxes on motor vehicles. 1. 1. Article 1, paragraph 1 states that Member States shall not impose vehicle taxes following a transfer of residence. All taxes other than VAT and periodic road taxes are covered. 1. 2. Article 1, paragraph 2 states that each Member State shall allow vehicles registered in other Member States to be used on its territory without requiring payment of vehicle taxes. All taxes other than VAT are covered. 1. 3. Article 1, paragraph 3 extends the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 to normal spare parts, accessories and equipment. 1. 4. Article 1, paragraph 4 specifies that VAT is not covered by this directive. Article 2. 2. Article 2 defines commercial vehicle, private vehicle, business use, private use, residence and family. TITLE II General rules for determining normal residence Article 3. 3. Article 3 sets out the general rules for determining normal residence. They are largely the same as those contained in the Directives being repealed. 3. 1. Article 3, paragraph 1 states that normal residence shall be determined by reference to the place where a person usually lives, i. e. for at least 185 days per year, because of personal and professional ties. 3. 2. Article 3, paragraph 2 states that, where a person's professional and personal ties are located in two different Member States, his/her place of residence shall be the Member State where his/her personal ties are located, provided he/she returns there regularly. 3. 3. Article 3, paragraph 3 states that, where the professional and personal ties are located in two different Member States but where the person is living in a Member State to carry out a task of a definite duration, his/her place of residence shall be that of the personal ties, irrespective of whether he/she returns there regularly. 3. 4. Article 3, paragraph 4 states that attendance at a university or school in another Member State shall not imply a change of residence. 3. 5. Article 3, paragraph 5 introduces a new provision, stating that a change in marital status does not automatically imply a change of residence. Thus, for example, a student who marries in the Member State of his/her studies does not automatically become a resident of that State. This was the essence of the Profant judgement of the European Court of Justice5. 3. 6. Article 3, paragraph 6 describes forms of evidence of normal residence. 3. 7. Article 3, paragraph 7 permits Member States to seek additional information from the individual concerned or the competent authorities of other Member States in cases of doubt. TITLE III Transfer of residence Article 4. 4. Article 4 sets out the conditions relating to vehicles on which no tax is payable following a transfer of residence. 4. 1. Article 4, paragraph 1 states that a vehicle must have been acquired under normal taxation rules and not be subject to a refund as a result of its being transferred to another Member State. (A vehicle purchased under diplomatic privelege is deemed to satisfy these requirements, as is a vehicle acquired under special arrangements for international arrangements, NATO forces, etc. ) The vehicle must have been used by the person for six months prior to transfer of residence. It must also be transferred not later than twelve months after the transfer of residence. These two latter conditions are largely reproduced from Directive If a greater degree of approximation of tax systems existed, such 83/183/EEC, provisions should not be necessary. However, given the current wide discrepancies, it is considered that these measures should be retained, in order to prevent excessive erosion of Member States tax bases through last minute tax avoidance schemes. Nonetheless, the restriction on disposal within 12 months after transfer has been deleted. It is considered that this is too restrictive in the context of the single market, bearing in mind that the relief is only available where a genuine transfer of residence is taking place. 4. 2. Article 4, paragraph 2 states that Member States may increase the six month period of prior ownership to 12 months in the case of vehicles purchased under diplomatic privelege. This is a reproduction of a provision in Directive 83/183/EEC. Judgement of 03. 10. 1985 (Case 249/84 Ministère Public v Profant [1985] ECR 3237) TITLE IV Temporary use of a vehicle in a Member State other than that of registration Article 5, 5. Article 5 states the general rules under which vehicles may be used temporarily in a Member State other than that of registration without payment of taxes in the Member State of temporary use. 5. 1. Article 5, paragraph 1 states that taxes shall not be imposed where the period of temporary use does not exceed six months in any 12 months. The following conditions also apply: (a) (b) (c) the user must have his/her normal residence in another Member State; use must be confined to private use; the vehicle must not be hired out or lent to a resident of the Member State of temporary use. This is largely as before, with the exception that a restriction on disposal has been removed. Consequently, disposal would be permitted, though of course that would mark the end of the period of temporary use, and final taxation arrangements should then apply. 5. 2. Article 5, paragraph 2 increases the six month period to nine months in the case of a person whose professional ties are in a different Member State to that of his/her normal residence. This provision is considered necessary to cater for the growing number of people who work during the week in one Member State and who only return at weekends and holidays to the Member State of normal residence, where their personal ties are located. A period of nine months is considered sufficient to cover the typical amount of time per year which a person might spend in another Member State for professional reasons, following deduction of holidays, weekends, etc. Complaints have been received that Member States have required people working on their territory to register their private vehicles, and pay taxes, once the standard six month period is exceeded Article 6. 6. Article 6 identifies several specific types of cases where, although the general conditions laid down in article 5 may not be satisfied, taxation may not be imposed in the Member State of temporary use. 6. 1. Article 6, indent (a) allows re-rental of a rental vehicle, which is in the Member State as a result of a rental contract ending there, to a non-resident for up to two months, or for up to thirty days longer if it is to be removed from the State during the rental period. It also allows rental to a resident with a view to removal within fifteen days. These are new provisions, which are intended to overcome practical problems that can arise when a rental contract ends in a Member State other than that in which the contract commenced, and should allow better fleet management for car rental companies. The existing provision, allowing an employee of the rental company to repatriate the vehicle, even if the employee is a resident of the Member State of temporary use, is also reproduced. 7 6. 2. Article 6, indent (b) permits use of a vehicle rented in and registered in another Member State, subject to a maximum of eight days. 6. 3. Article 6, indent (c) allows members of the user's family to use the vehicle while the user is in the Member State. This is a new provision, to reflect the reality which can arise regarding shared use of a motor vehicle within a family unit. 6. 4. Article 6, indent (d) allows use by any person when the person who brought the vehicle to the Member State is on board. Similarly, this is intended to reflect situations which can often arise whereby the person who brought the vehicle to the Member State of temporary use may not wish to be the driver all of the time. He must be on board, however, unless the driver is a member of his/her family. 6. 5. Article 6, indent (e) allows a person to return to his/her Member State of normal residence with a vehicle registered in another Member State, where his/her own vehicle has become immobilised in that State. Exemption is limited to the period during which his/her vehicle is under repair, and is subject to a maximum period of two months. 6. 6. Article 6, indent (f) allows an employee to use in the Member State of his/her normal residence a vehicle provided by his/her employer, located in another Member State. The Member State in which the employee is resident cannot impose taxes, and there is no time limit. This provision is a logical consequence of the Court of Justice judgement in the Ledoux case6 which found that exemption from VAT was warranted in such circumstances, taking into account the principle of free movement of workers: the case did not specifically address taxes other than VAT. It is also proposed that both professional and private use should be allowed, as should use by family members. 6. 7. Article 6, indent (g) permits unlimited use of their own vehicles by persons whose journey to and from work involves travelling to another Member State. This provision already exists in Directive 83/182/EEC. 6. 8. Article 6, indent (h) provides that students may use, in the Member State of their studies, vehicles registered in their Member State of normal residence. This provision already exists in Directive 83/182/EEC. Article 7. 7. Article 7 governs temporary business use of a private vehicle. 7. 1. Article 7, paragraph 1 states the conditions under which Member States may not impose taxes on private vehicles temporarily on their territory for business use. These are that the user must be non-resident, the vehicle must not be used to carry passengers commercially or to carry goods, the vehicle must not be hired or Judgement of 06. 07. 1988 (Case 127/86 Ministère Public v Ledoux 11988] ECR 3741) lent and it must have been registered and subject to taxation in the Member State of residence of the user. The non-resident requirement does not apply in the case of an employee using a vehicle provided by the employer, established in another Member State. As for article 5, the existing prohibition on disposal is being dropped. 7. 2. Article 7, paragraph 2 specifies theat this provision shall not be subject to any time limit. This is considered appropriate in the context of the internal market, and is not expected to pose any significant threat to Member States' revenues. Previously it was seven months for certain users and six for others. Article 8. 8. Article 8 states that taxes shall not be sought in the Member State of temporary use where, during a period of legitimate temporary use, a vehicle is damaged and where the cost of repair exceeds the value of the vehicle. This is a logical provision, to cater for unforeseen problems which can arise as a result of accident, breakdown etc. The vehicle must be disposed of for scrapping purposes. This provision is intended to ensure that the vehicle does not end up being used again. Article 9. 9. Article 9 deals with vehicles which will be used by non-residents for periods exceeding those laid down in this proposal. 9. 1. Article 9, paragraph 1 requires Member States to register such vehicles. 9. 2. Article 9, paragraph 2 allows Member States which register such vehicles to impose their normal tax rules on such vehicles. 9. 3 Article 9, paragraph 3 allows Member States to prohibit use by their residents of such vehicles on their territory. TITLE V Final provisions Article 10. 10. Article 10 is concerned with infringements and related sanctions. 10. 1. Article 10, paragraph 1 states that Member States shall not deem a vehicle to have been brought to their territory permanently where it does not comply with the provisions of this directive. Breach of the rules governing temporary use should not automatically result in tax becoming due. The purpose of this provision is to provide a choice for the individual concerned whether to pay the tax sought or to remove the vehicle from the Member State without payment of tax. 10. 2. Article 10, paragraph 2 provides that any sanctions to be applied should take account of whether the person concerned has acted in good faith and whether any intention of fraud exists. 10. 3. Article 10, paragraph 3 states that sanctions imposed must not be disproportionate to the seriousness of the infringement. This takes account of consistent jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice7 in which it has been held that if measures adopted to prevent tax fraud are not excessive, they are compatible with the principle of free movement of goods and persons. Article 11. 11. Article 11 states that, where a used vehicle is brought into a Member State in circumstances other than those covered by this directive, and that Member State imposes a registration tax or similar tax, the amount of tax must not exceed the residual tax contained in the value of a similar car on the domestic market of the Member State in question. This simply puts into the directive a principle which has been established by the Court of Justice8, based on the correct application of article 95 of the Treaty. The situation could arise, for example, where a resident of a Member State chooses to buy a used car in another Member State, or where a person transfers his/her residence but does not fulfil all the conditions prescribed in this directive. Article 12. 12. Article 12 imposes on Member States the obligation to cooperate with each other where difficulties arise in the application of the Directive. 12. 1 Article 12, paragraph 1 states that Member States shall take decisions by mutual agreement. 12. 2. Article 12, paragraph 2 states that where a claim regarding a person's place of normal residence is disputed, the competent authorities of the Member States in question must consult with each other to resolve the matter. In addition, tax shall not be imposed in the Member State to which a person claims to be transferring residence, or claims to be using temporarily a vehicle registered in another Member State, pending the outcome of such consultations. This provision is necessary to ease the burden of proof on the individual, and to avoid him/her being exposed to difficulties as a result of matters beyond his/her control. 12. 3. Article 12, paragraph 3 states that, where no agreement is reached, the matter shall be referred to the Commission, which shall issue a decision on the place of Judgement of 09. 10. 1980 (Case 823/79 ( arciali| 19801 ECR 2773, pi. 9) Judgement or 25. 02. 1988 (Oise 299/86 Dn-xl 11988| ECR 1213, pt. 18) Judgement of 14. 12. 1995 (Case 387/90 lionchero 11995| ECR 4663 pt. 58) Judgement of 11. 12. 1990 (Case 47/88 C 'ommission v Denmark (19901 ECR 4509) Judgement of 09. 03. 1995 (Case 345/93 Nuhes Tadeu [1995] ECR 479) 10 residence to be used for the purposes of taxing the vehicle. Such a decision would obviously be open to challenge in the European Court of Justice. Article 13, 13. Article 13 repeals directives 83/182/EEC and 83/183/EEC. H Proposal for a Council Directive governing the tax treatment of private motor yehicles movzû permanently to another Member State in connection with a. transfer of residence or used temporarily in a Member State other than that in which they are registered. THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 99 thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament, Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee, [Recital #1] Whereas, in the single market, tax obstacles to the free movement of persons and their personal property, including motor vehicles, should be removed; [Recital #2] Whereas, at present, Community law regarding the tax treatment of private motor vehicles used temporarily in a Member State other than that in which they are registered is unnecessarily restrictive in the context of the principles of the single market; [Recital #3] Whereas, furthermore, present Community law covering the tax treatment of motor vehicles belonging to persons transferring residence from one Member State to another can place an unnecessary administrative burden on such persons to prove that a liability to pay tax does not exist; [Recital #4] Whereas, accordingly, the terms of the exemptions provided by Council Directive 83/182/EEC on tax exemptions within the Community for certain means of transport temporarily imported into one Member State from another9 and Council Directive 83/183/EEC on tax exemptions applicable to permanent imports from a Member State of the personal property of individuals10 do not reflect the present needs concerning free circulation of persons and of goods; [Recital #5] Whereas, in any event, Directives 83/182/EEC and 83/183/EEC no longer accurately cover the systems of taxation of motor vehicles applied by Member States since the introduction of the single market; whereas their application to exemption from VAT has already been repealed by Article 2 of Council Directive 91/680/EEC supplementing the common system of value added tax and amending Directive 9 10 O. J. No. L 105, 23. 4. 83, p. 59. O. J. No. L 105, 23. 4. 83, p. 64. 12 77/388/EEC with a view to the abolition of fiscal frontiers11; whereas, in practice, problems concerning taxation of property following a transfer of residence are confined to motor vehicles and it is thus no longer neceessary to lay down rules for other goods; whereas permanent exemptions other than in connection with transfer of residence need no longer be provided for; Whereas, however, abuses caused by the differing levels of taxation of motor vehicles between Member States should be prevented; whereas, therefore, it is still necessary to provide for certain restrictions on temporary use by residents of vehicles registered in other Member States; [Recital #7] Whereas, therefore, the provisions of Directives 83/182/EEC and 83/183/EEC require updating and these directives should be repealed and replaced by a single, consolidated directive; [Recital #8] Whereas Member States should not charge taxes on private motor vehicles moved to their territory from other Member States by individuals transferring residence from such Member States; [Recital #9] Whereas Member States should not charge taxes on private motor vehicles registered in other Member States where such vehicles are used temporarily on their territory, in certain defined circumstances; [Recital #10] Whereas for the purposes of determining liability to tax it is necessary to define the place of normal residence of the vehicle user; [Recital #11] Whereas in the case of transfer of residence, no tax should be payable in the new Member State, subject to certain conditions and provided the vehicle has been acquired in accordance with the tax rules of the first Member State; [Recital #12} Whereas temporary use in another Member State without payment of taxes should be permittee for a period of six months in any twelve; whereas, in the case of a person whose professional ties are in another Member State, this should be increased to nine monthi; [Recital #13] Whereas it is necessary, in the interests of the internal market, to introduce some flexibility concerning the use of rental vehicles in Member States other than that of registration, subject to certain conditions; whereas, furthermore, it is necessary to expressly provide for use of vehicles by certain persons other than the owner, and 11 O. J. No. L 376, 31. 12. 91, p. 1. 13 whereas it is necessary, in certain circumstances, to allow use by a resident of a Member State a vehicle registered in another Member State; [Recital #14] Whereas it is necessary to provide rules governing the temporary use of a private vehicle in another Member State for business purposes; [Recital #15] Whereas vehicles which, during temporary use in another Member State, are irretrievably damaged should not incur liability to taxation as a result; [Recital #16] Whereas persons who wish to use vehicles in a Member State other than that of their place of residence should be entitled to register vehicles in such Member States; whereas, in such cases, taxes shall be payable in the Member State of registration; whereas, furthermore, the Member State of residence of the owner may prohibit use of such vehicles on its territory; [Recital #17] Whereas, in cases where infringements of the rules are encountered, any sanctions imposed shall be proportionate to the offence; [Recital #18] Whereas, in cases where Member States are entitled to impose registration or similar taxes on used vehicles arriving from other Member States, they shall ensure that the tax charged does not exceed the residual amount of tax contained in the value of similar vehicles on the domestic market, in accordance with article 95 of the Treaty; [Recital #19] Whereas, in cases of dispute, the competent authorities of the relevant Member States shall consult with each other; whereas, furthermore, in such cases tax should not be imposed pending the outcome of such consultations by the relevant competent authorities; whereas if no agreement is reached between the competent authorities, the Commission should decide on the matter; HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: 14 TITLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 Prohibition on imposing taxes in certain circumstances 1. A Member State shall not impose excise duties, registration taxes and/or other consumption taxes, such as the taxes listed in Annex I, but excluding the taxes listed in Annex II, on private motor vehicles registered in other Member States and brought into that Member State permanently in connection with the transfer of normal residence of a private individual from another Member State, subject to the conditions laid down below. 2. A Member State shall not impose excise duties, registration taxes, other consumption taxes and/or road taxes, such as the taxes listed in Annex I and Annex II, on private motor vehicles registered in other Member States and used temporarily on its territory, subject to the conditions laid down below. The provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 shall also apply to the normal spare parts, 3. accessories and equipment of the motor vehicle. 4. This Directive shall not apply to value added tax. Article 2 Definitions For the purposes of this Directive: "commercial vehicle" means any road vehicle which, by its design or (a) equipment, is suitable for and intended for transporting, whether for payment or not: - more than nine persons, including the driver, - goods, as well as any road vehicle for special use other than transport as such; "private vehicle" means any road vehicle, including its trailer, if any, other than (b) a commercial vehicle; "business use" of a motor vehicle means the use thereof in the direct exercise of (c) an activity carried out for consideration or financial gain; (d) "private use" means any use other than business use; (e) "residence" means normal residence as defined in Article 3; 15 a person's "family" shall be deemed to mean his spouse, his immediate (0 ancestors and descendants and those of his spouse. TITLE II NORMAL RESIDENCE Article 3 General rules for determining normal residence 1. For the purposes of this Directive, "normal residence" means the place where a person usually lives, that is for at least 185 days in each calendar year, because of personal and occupational ties or, in the case of a person with no occupational ties, because of personal ties which show close links between that person and the place where he is living. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, the normal residence of a person whose 2. occupational ties are in a different place from his personal ties, and who consequently lives in turn in different places situated in two or more Member States, shall be regarded as being the place of his personal ties, provided that he returns there regularly. 3. Where a person is living in a Member State in order to carry out a task of a definite duration, and as a result has his occupational ties in a different place from his personal ties, his place of residence shall be regarded as being the place of his personal ties, irrespective of whether he returns there regularly. Attendance at a university or school in another Member State shall not imply 4. transfer of normal residence. A change in a person's marital status shall not, of itself, imply a change of 5. residence. Individuals shall give evidence of their place of normal residence by any 6. appropriate means, such as their identity card or any other valid document. 7. Without prejudice to Article 12, where the competent authorities of the Member state of destination have doubts as to the validity of a statement as to normal residence made in accordance with this Article, or for the purpose of certain specific controls, they may request additional information or evidence either from the individual making the statement or from the competent authorities of the other Member State concerned. 16 TITLE III TRANSFER OF RESIDENCE Article 4 Conditions under which tax is not payable following a transfer of residence The provisions of Article 1 (1) shall apply where the following conditions are 1. fulfilled: (a) the motor vehicle has been acquired under the general conditions of taxation in force in the domestic market of one of the Member States and is not subject, as a result of its being brought to another Member State, to any exemption from or refund of any of the taxes referred to in Article 1(1) in the Member State from which it is brought. These two conditions shall be deemed to be fulfilled if the vehicle bears a standard registration plate of the Member State of registration, all types of temporary plate being excluded. For the purposes of this Directive, the general conditions of taxation shall be deemed to include diplomatic and consular arrangements, agreements concerning international organisations and their members, arrangements governing forces which are party to the North Atlantic Treaty or the civilian staff accompanying them. (b) the person transferring residence has had the use of the vehicle for a period of at least six months prior to the transfer of residence; (c) the motor vehicle is brought into the Member State to which the person transfers his residence not later than 12 months after such transfer. In the case of vehicles acquired under the diplomatic and consular arrangements 2. or other arrangements mentioned in the third indent of paragraph 1 (a), Member States may increase the period mentioned in paragraph 1 (b) to 12 months. 17 TITLE IV TEMPORARY USE OF A VEHICLE Article 5 General conditions under which tax is not payable when a vehicle is used temporarily in a Member State other than that of registration 1. The provisions of Article 1 (2) shall apply in respect of a motor vehicle used temporarily in a Member State, other than the Member State in which it is registered, for a period, continuous or otherwise, of not more than six months in any 12 months, provided that: (a) the person using the vehicle has his normal residence in a Member State other than the Member State of temporary use; (b) the vehicle is only the subject of private use; (c) the vehicle is not hired out in the Member State of temporary use, or lent to a resident of that State, other than as provided for in Article 6. The period of six months referred to in paragraph 1 shall be increased to nine 2. months in the case of a person whose occupational ties are not in the Member State of his normal residence and who uses in the Member State of his occupational ties a vehicle registered in the Member State of his normal residence. Article 6 Specific cases of private use where taxation is not permitted In addition to the cases covered by Article 5, the provisions of Article 1 (2) shall apply in respect of the following cases: (a) a private vehicle belonging to a car rental firm, where that vehicle is in the Member State of temporary use as a result of a rental contract which ended in that Member State and which: is re-rented to a person other than a resident of (aa) the Member State of temporary use, subject to the limitation that the period of any such re-renting must terminate within two months of the end-date of the original contract under which the vehicle was returned to the car rental firm in the current Member State, save where the vehicle is re-rented to a non-resident with a view to being removed from that State within thirty days from the date of the new rental period; (bb) is re-rented to a resident of the Member State of temporary use with a view to being removed from that State within fifteen days from the beginning of the new rental period, or 18 (ce) is returned by an employee of the car rental firm to the country where it was originally rented even if such employee resides in the Member State of temporary use; (b) a private vehicle registered in another Member State and rented from a car rental firm under a rental contract which commenced in that Member State by a resident of the Member State of temporary use, subject to a limit of eight days use; (c) a private vehicle used, while the person who brought the vehicle to the Member State of temporary use is in that Member State, by members of his family, whether or not such family members have their normal residence in the Member State of temporary use; (d) a private vehicle used by any person, provided that the person who brought the vehicle to the Member State of temporary use is also on board the vehicle; (e) a private vehicle registered in another Member State and used by a resident of the Member State of temporary use following temporary immobilisation of his vehicle as a result of breakdown or accident in the other Member State, where such use is confined to the period during which the user's own vehicle is being repaired and in any event does not exceed a maximum period of two months; (f) a private vehicle registered in another Member State which belongs to or is hired by an undertaking established in the Member State in which it is registered and which is used by an employee of such undertaking, or by a member of the family of such employee, where such user has his normal residence in the Member State of temporary use. This category shall not be subject to any time limit; (g) a private vehicle registered in the country of normal residence of the user and used regularly for the journey from his residence to his place of work in another Member State, and vice versa. This category shall not be subject to any time limit; (h) a private vehicle registered in the Member State of his normal residence used by a student in the Member State in which he is pursuing his studies, where such Member State is not that of his normal residence. Article 7 Cases of business use where taxation is not permitted 1. A Member State shall not impose the taxes specified in Article 1(2) on a private vehicle used temporarily on its territory for business purposes, provided that: (a) the person using the vehicle has his normal residence in a Member State other than the Member State of temporary use; This condition need not apply in the case of a person who has his normal residence in the Member State of temporary use, where that person is an employee of an -19 undertaking established in another Member State and is using a vehicle which belongs to or is hired by that undertaking and which is registered in the Member State where the undertaking is established. (b) the vehicle is not used in the Member State of temporary use to carry passengers for hire or material reward of any kind, or for the industrial and/or commercial transport of goods, whether for reward or not; (c) the vehicle is not hired out or lent in the Member State of temporary use; (d) the vehicle is registered in the Member State of normal residence of the user; (e) the vehicle has been acquired under the general conditions of taxation of the Member State of normal residence of the user and is not subject to any refund of any of the taxes referred to in Article 1 (2) by virtue of its being used in another Member State. This condition shall be deemed to be satisfied if the vehicle bears a standard registration plate of the Member State of registration, all types of temporary plate being excluded; (f) any periodic vehicle taxes ordinarily payable in the Member State of registration are paid. 2. The provisions of paragraph 1 shall apply without any time limit. Article 8 Provisions concerning irreparable damage to vehicles Where a private vehicle registered in another Member State is used temporarily in a Member State without imposition of the taxes referred to in Article 1(2) in accordance with the provisions of this directive, and that vehicle becomes badly damaged as a result of a duly proven accident, breakdown or criminal or malicious act which occurs within that Member State, where the cost of the requisite repairs exceeds the market value of the vehicle, and where the vehicle is disposed of with a view to being scrapped or destroyed, no subseqeunt demand for any of the taxes referred to in article 1(2) shall be made by the Member State of temporary use. The competent authorities of Member States may require proof of the damage and/or of the proper disposal of the vehicle. Article 9 Permanent use in a Member State other than that of normal residence 1. Where a person wishes to use a vehicle in a Member State other than that in which he has his place of normal residence for a period in excess of that provided for 20 in article 5, for example on an ongoing basis in connection with a secondary residence, the Member State in question shall register such vehicle. 2. Where the provisions of paragraph 1 apply, the Member State of registration shall be entitled to impose such taxes as would ordinarily be payable in connection with and following registration of such vehicle. 3. The Member State in which the owner of a vehicle as described in paragraph 1 has his place of normal residence may refuse to allow use of such vehicle on its territory. TITLE V FINAL PROVISIONS Article 10 Infringements and sanctions 1. Where a vehicle is used in a Member State temporarily and the provisions of this Directive are not complied with, such vehicle shall not be deemed to have been brought to that Member State permanently, and taxes shall not automatically be deemed to be payable. In such instance, notwithstanding any sanctions applied, the individual concerned may choose either to remove the vehicle from the Member State of temporary use or to have it registered, and to pay taxes, in the normal way in that Member State. In applying sanctions, Member States shall take into account the good faith of 2. the individuals concerned and the absence of any intention of fraud. 3. The control procedures applied by the competent authorities of the Member States shall not be framed in such a way as to restrict the free movement of goods and persons required by the Treaty. In cases where the provisions of this Directive are infringed, penalties shall not be so disproportionate to the gravity of the infirgement that they become an obstacle to the free movement of goods and persons. Article 11 Calculation of tax, where payable In cases where a used motor vehicle is brought permanently from one Member State to another, in circumstances other than those governed by this Directive, and the latter Member State imposes a registration tax or similar tax such as the taxes listed in Annex I on that vehicle, the Member State in question shall ensure that the amount of tax charged shall not be greater than the amount of residual tax contained in the value of a vehicle of similar age, characteristics and condition on the domestic market of that Member State. 21 Article 12 Seulement of disputes Where the practical application of this Directive gives rise to difficulties, the 1. competent authorities of the Member States concerned shall take the necessary decisions by mutual agreement. 2. In particular, where a person claims to have transferred his place of normal residence from one Member State to another, and that claim is disputed by the competent authorities of either of those states, the competent authorities of both States shall consult each other to decide which place of residence should be used for the purposes of deciding where the vehicle should be subject to taxation. Similarly, where a person claims to be using a vehicle temporarily in one Member State whilst his place of normal residence is in another Member State, and that claim is disputed by the competent authorities of the Member State in which the vehicle is being used, the competent authorities of both States shall consult each other to decide which residence should be used for the purposes of taxing the vehicle. The Member State to which the user claims'to have transferred his normal residence, or in which he claims to be using the vehicle temporarily, shall not impose the taxes referred to in article 1 pending the outcome of such consultations. If Member States do not come to an agreement within six months of the date of 3. the claim by the individual concerned, they shall refer the question to the Commission. The Commission, after having examined the arguments put forward by the two Member States and, if the Commission considers it appropriate, by the individual concerned, will issue a decision establishing which residence shall be used for the purposes of taxing the vehicle. Article 13 Repeals The following directives shall cease to have effect on 1 July 1998: Directive 83/182/EEC, Directive 83/183/EEC as amended by Directive 89/604/EEC. Article 14 Implementation of the Directive 1. users Member States may retain or introduce provisions which are more favourable to than those laid down in this Directive, in order to allow temporary use of 22 vehicles registered in other Member States, or permanent transfer of vehicles from other Member States, without imposition of the taxes referred to in Article 1. 2. the Member States may not, by virtue of this Directive, apply within Community tax treatment which is less favourable than that applied in connection with imports or use of vehicles brought directly from third countries. 3. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 1 July 1998. Member States shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof. When Member States adopt these measures, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference on the occasion of their official publication. The methods of making such reference shall be laid down by the Member States. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the texts of the main 4. provisions of national law which they adopt in the field governed by this Directive. Article 15 Addressees This Directive is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels For the Council The President 23 Annex I BELGIUM Taxe de mise en circulation DENMARK Registreringsafgift af motorkoretojer GERMANY GREECE Special Consumption Tax (EFK) Registration Tax (EPET) SPAIN Impuesto Especial sobre Determinados Medios de Transporte FRANCE Taxe sur les certificats d'immatriculation des véhicules à moteur IRELAND Vehicle Registration Tax ITALY IET APIET LUXEMBOURG NETHERLANDS Belastung Personenauto's en Motorrijwielen AUSTRIA Normverbrauchsabgabe PORTUGAL Imposto Automovel FINLAND Autovero SWEDEN Sales tax UNITED KINGDOM 24 Annex II BELGIUM Taxe de circulation sur les véhicules automobiles/Verkeersbelasting op de autovoertuigen Taxe compensatoire des accises/ Taxe de circulation complémentaire/ DENMARK Vaegtafgift af motorkoretojer GERMANY Kraftfahrzeugsteuer (Kraftfahrzeugsteuergesetz - 1979) Kraftfahrzeugsteuer (Durchfuhrungsverordnung - 1979) GREECE TEXT] KUKAOlt>Opl(XÇ SPAIN Impuesto sobre vehiculos de traccion mecanica Tributos Locales sobre circulacion de vehiculos automoviles FRANCE Taxe différentielle sur les véhicules à moteur Taxe sur les véhicules des sociétés IRELAND Motor vehicle excise duties ITALY Tassa sulla circolazione degli autoveicoli LUXEMBOURG Taxe sur les véhicules automoteurs NETHERLANDS Motorrijtuigenbelasting AUSTRIA Kraftfahrzeugsteuer PORTUGAL Imposto municipal sobre veiculos Imposto de circulacâo FINLAND Moottoriajoneuvovero Windscreen sticker tax SWEDEN Vagtrafikskatt UNITED KINGDOM Vehicle excise duty 25 STATEMENT OF IMPACT ON SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES The proposed directive seeks to simplify the conditions and procedures relating to the movement of private motor vehicles, either temporarily or permanently, between Member States, and is a logical consequence of the introduction of the single market. 1. Administrative obligations on firms as a result of enactment of the legislation: None. 2. Advantages for businesses: The proposals include a number of provisions which, in certain circumstances, allow a resident of a Member State to use in his Member State of normal residence a hire-car registered in another Member State. This will facilitate better fleet management for car-hire firms. The proposals contain provisions improving the rights of persons whose place of employment is in a Member State other than that of their normal residence to use in the latter Member State a car provided by their improvement for employees should have a employer. Such an consequent benefit for employers. 3. Disadvantages for businesses: None. 4. Effect on employment. No major effect on employment anticipated. 5. Consultations with social partners. No. 6. Is there an alternative, less binding, approach? The proposals are considered to be the minimum necessary to address the underlying problems and to be compatible with the single market. 26 ISSN 0254-1475 COM(98) 30 final DOCUMENTS EN 09 07 06 16 Catalogue number : CB-CO-98-031-EN-C ISBN 92-78-30303-8 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg 3>


title: KOMMISSIONENS FÖRORDNING (EG) nr 332/98 av den 10 februari 1998 om fastställande av jordbruksomräkningskurser

eurovoc_concepts:
primary sector
representative rate

formats: pdf print

text: L 37/22 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 11. 2. 98 KOMMISSIONENS F(cid:153)RORDNING (EG) nr 332/98 av den 10 februari 1998 om fastst(cid:132)llande av jordbruksomr(cid:132)kningskurser EUROPEISKA GEMENSKAPERNAS KOMMISSION HAR ANTAGIT DENNA F(cid:153)RORDNING med beaktande av F(cid:148)rdraget om uppr(cid:132)ttandet av Europe- iska gemenskapen, med beaktande av r(cid:134)dets f(cid:148)rordning (EEG) nr 3813/92 av den 28 december 1992 om den ber(cid:132)kningsenhet och de omr(cid:132)kningskurser till(cid:132)mpas avseende den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken ( 1), senast (cid:132)ndrad genom f(cid:148)rordning (EG) nr 150/95 ( 2), s(cid:132)rskilt artikel 3. 1 i denna, och som skall med beaktande av f(cid:148)ljande: Jordbruksomr(cid:132)kningskurserna har fastst(cid:132)llts kommissionens f(cid:148)rordning (EG) nr 270/98 ( 3). genom I artikel 4 i f(cid:148)rordning (EEG) nr 3813/92 f(cid:148)reskrivs att, utom n(cid:132)r bekr(cid:132)ftelseperioder intr(cid:132)der, jordbruksomr(cid:132)- kningskursen i en valuta skall (cid:132)ndras n(cid:132)r avvikelsen fr(cid:134)n den representativa marknadskursen (cid:148)verstiger vissa niv(cid:134)er. De representativa marknadskurserna fastst(cid:132)lls p(cid:134) grundval av basreferensperioderna, eller vid behov de bekr(cid:132)ftelse- perioder som fastst(cid:132)llts enligt artikel 2 i kommissionens f(cid:148)rordning (EEG) nr 1068/93 av den 30 april 1993 om n(cid:132)rmare f(cid:148)reskrifter f(cid:148)r fastst(cid:132)llande och till(cid:132)mpning av jordbruksomr(cid:132)kningskurserna ( 4), senast (cid:132)ndrad genom f(cid:148)rordning (EG) nr 1482/96 ( 5). I punkt 2 i n(cid:132)mnda artikel f(cid:148)reskrivs att, d(cid:134) det absoluta v(cid:132)rdet av skillnaden som mellan valutaavvikelserna i ber(cid:132)knas p(cid:134) grundval av genomsnittet av ecukurserna f(cid:148)r tre p(cid:134) varandra f(cid:148)ljande noteringsdagar, (cid:148)verstiger sex procentenheter, skall de representativa marknadskurserna anpassas p(cid:134) grundval av de tre noteringsdagarna i fr(cid:134)ga. tv(cid:134) medlemsstater, Till f(cid:148)ljd av v(cid:132)xelkurserna fr(cid:134)n den 1 till den 10 februari 1998 (cid:132)r det n(cid:148)dv(cid:132)ndigt att fastst(cid:132)lla en ny jordbruksom- r(cid:132)kningskurs f(cid:148)r den svenska kronan. I artikel 15. 2 i f(cid:148)rordning (EEG) nr 1068/93 f(cid:148)reskrivs att en f(cid:148)rutfastst(cid:132)lld jordbruksomr(cid:132)kningskurs skall anpassas d(cid:134) den avviker med mer (cid:132)n fyra procentenheter fr(cid:134)n den omr(cid:132)kningskurs som g(cid:132)ller n(cid:132)r den avg(cid:148)rande faktorn f(cid:148)r det aktuella beloppet intr(cid:132)ffar. I detta fall skall den f(cid:148)rut- fastst(cid:132)llda jordbruksomr(cid:132)kningskursen anpassas till den g(cid:132)llande kursen till en avvikelseniv(cid:134) p(cid:134) fyra procenten- heter. Det (cid:132)r l(cid:132)mpligt att ange den kurs som ers(cid:132)tter den f(cid:148)rutfastst(cid:132)llda jordbruksomr(cid:132)kningskursen. H(cid:142)RIGENOM F(cid:153)RESKRIVS F(cid:153)LJANDE. Artikel 1 Jordbruksomr(cid:132)kningskurserna fastst(cid:132)lls i bilaga I. Artikel 2 I det fall som avses i artikel 15. 2 i f(cid:148)rordning (EEG) nr 1068/93 skall den f(cid:148)rutfastst(cid:132)llda jordbruksomr(cid:132)knings- kursen ers(cid:132)ttas med den ecukurs f(cid:148)r den ber(cid:148)rda valutan som st(cid:134)r i bilaga II enligt f(cid:148)ljande: (cid:190) tabell A n(cid:132)r denna kurs (cid:132)r h(cid:148)gre (cid:132)n den f(cid:148)rutfast- st(cid:132)llda kursen, eller (cid:190) tabell B n(cid:132)r denna kurs (cid:132)r l(cid:132)gre (cid:132)n den f(cid:148)rutfastst(cid:132)llda kursen. Artikel 3 F(cid:148)rordning (EG) nr 270/98 skall upph(cid:148)ra att g(cid:132)lla. Artikel 4 Denna f(cid:148)rordning tr(cid:132)der i kraft den 11 februari 1998. Denna f(cid:148)rordning (cid:132)r till alla delar bindande och direkt till(cid:132)mplig i alla medlemsstater. Utf(cid:132)rdad i Bryssel den 10 februari 1998. P(cid:134) kommissionens v(cid:132)gnar Franz FISCHLER Ledamot av kommissionen (1) EGT L 387, 31. 12. 1992, s. 1. (2) EGT L 22, 31. 1. 1995, s. 1. (3) EGT L 25, 31. 1. 1998, s. 79. (4) EGT L 108, 1. 5. 1993, s. 106. (5) EGT L 188, 27. 7. 1996, s. 22. 11. 2. 98 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning L 37/23 BILAGA I Jordbruksomr(cid:132)kningskurser 1 ecu = 40,9321 7,54917 1,98243 312,011 201,690 6,68769 6,02811 2,23273 0,785663 1 973,93 13,9485 167,153 8,76111 0,695735 belgiska och luxemburgska franc danska kronor tyska mark grekiska drachmer portugisiska escudos franska franc finska mark nederl(cid:132)ndska gulden irl(cid:132)ndska pund italienska lire (cid:148)sterrikiska schilling spanska pesetas svenska kronor pund sterling BILAGA II F(cid:148)rutfastst(cid:132)llda och anpassade jordbruksomr(cid:132)kningskurser Tabell A Tabell B 1 ecu = 39,3578 7,25882 1,90618 300,011 193,933 6,43047 5,79626 2,14686 0,755445 1 898,01 13,4120 160,724 8,42414 0,668976 belgiska och luxemburgska franc danska kronor tyska mark grekiska drachmer portugisiska escudos franska franc finska mark nederl(cid:132)ndska gulden irl(cid:132)ndska pund italienska lire (cid:148)sterrikiska schilling spanska pesetas svenska kronor pund sterling 1 ecu = 42,6376 7,86372 2,06503 325,011 210,094 6,96634 6,27928 2,32576 0,818399 2 056,18 14,5297 174,118 9,12616 0,724724 belgiska och luxemburgska franc danska kronor tyska mark grekiska drachmer portugisiska escudos franska franc finska mark nederl(cid:132)ndska gulden irl(cid:132)ndska pund italienska lire (cid:148)sterrikiska schilling spanska pesetas svenska kronor pund sterling


title: PREGUNTA ESCRITA n. 330/98 del Ulf HOLM a la Comisión. Situación del sector público en Suecia

eurovoc_concepts:
Sweden
budget policy
economic consequence
economic disparity
fiscal policy
public economy
public sector
tax system

formats: html pdf print

text: 9. 10. 98 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas C 310/51 (98/C 310/63) PREGUNTA ESCRITA P-0330/98 de Ulf Holm (V) a la Comisio·n (10 de febrero de 1998) Asunto: Situacio·n del sector pu·blico en Suecia Con ocasio·n de los recortes que se han registrado en los u·ltimos an(cid:152)os en el sector pu·blico sueco, se han escuchado numerosas opiniones en el sentido de que, en comparacio·n con otros pa(cid:14)·ses, este sector es demasiado grande en Suecia. Un gran sector pu·blico exige una imposicio·n fiscal elevada, la cual, a su vez, se considera que desfavorece a la industria del pa(cid:14)·s en cuestio·n. Por el contrario, el Sr. Thomas O¤ stros, Ministro de Finanzas de Suecia, ha declarado que el problema lo constituye ma·s bien el bajo nivel impositivo de otros pa(cid:14)·ses de la UE, que da lugar a una «competencia desleal». Mientras que en Suecia la presio·n fiscal se situ·a en un 50,2 % de su PNB, por ejemplo este porcentaje es del 44,5 % en Francia. ¿Opina la Comisio·n Europea que el gran sector pu·blico existente en Suecia representa de alguna manera un problema para el mercado interior de la UE? Respuesta del Sr. De Silguy en nombre de la Comisio·n (7 de abril de 1998) Los Estados miembros han afrontado en las tres u·ltimas de·cadas un incremento sustancial de la parte que representa su gasto pu·blico en su Producto Interior Bruto (PIB), as(cid:14)· como en su presio·n fiscal (porcentaje del PIB que representa la suma de los impuestos indirectos, los impuestos directos y las contribuciones sociales). La magnitud de la presio·n fiscal var(cid:14)·a entre Estados miembros. A este respecto, Suecia se situ·a en el grupo con la mayor presio·n fiscal junto con Dinamarca (53 %-54 % del PIB en 1996). Los restantes Estados miembros pueden dividirse en dos grupos: un grupo intermedio (con una presio·n fiscal comprendida entre el 42 % y el 48 % del PIB en 1996) compuesto de Be·lgica, Alemania, Francia, Italia, Luxemburgo, Pa(cid:14)·ses Bajos, Austria y Finlandia, y un grupo con una presio·n fiscal ma·s baja (del 33 % al 36 % del PIB en 1996), compuesto por Grecia, Espan(cid:152)a, Irlanda, Portugal y el Reino Unido. La prioridad de la pol(cid:14)·tica presupuestaria aplicada dentro de la Comunidad en la de·cada de los noventa ha sido mejorar la situacio·n de las finanzas pu·blicas de los Estados miembros para hacerlas sostenibles a medio plazo. La Comisio·n, con el apoyo de todos los Estados miembros, ha disen(cid:152)ado una estrategia para lograr este objetivo, particularmente en las Orientaciones generales de pol(cid:14)·tica econo·mica. En primer lugar, ha de darse prioridad a la limitacio·n del gasto frente a nuevos aumentos de la presio·n fiscal. En segundo lugar, las medidas de reduccio·n del gasto no han de poner en peligro la necesaria reduccio·n de los de·ficit presupuestarios, y han de estar acompan(cid:152)adas, en la medida de lo posible, por una modificacio·n de las prioridades de gasto pu·blico, que ha de orientarse hacia actividades ma·s productivas. En tercer lugar, la reduccio·n de la presio·n fiscal en la mayor(cid:14)·a de Estados miembros, especialmente sobre el factor trabajo, ha de estar acompan(cid:152)ada de un control estricto del gasto que permita la compatibilidad de las reducciones impositivas con el logro y mantenimiento de un so·lido equilibrio presupuestario. La Comisio·n tambie·n estima que, habida cuenta de la interrelacio·n entre la pol(cid:14)·tica fiscal, por una parte, y el mercado u·nico, la unio·n econo·mica y monetaria y la lucha contra el desempleo, por otra, los Estados miembros se beneficiar(cid:14)·an de una mayor cooperacio·n en el a·mbito de la pol(cid:14)·tica fiscal. As(cid:14)· pues, habra· de evitarse una competencia perjudicial entre los reg(cid:14)·menes tributarios de los distintos Estados miembros. (98/C 310/64) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-0350/98 de Amedeo Amadeo (NI) a la Comisio·n (17 de febrero de 1998) Asunto: Impuestos ambientales En relacio·n con la Comunicacio·n de la Comisio·n «Impuestos y grava·menes ambientales en el Mercado U· nico» (doc. COM(97) 9 final), ¿no deber(cid:14)·a la Comisio·n, una vez concluidos los ana·lisis sobre la repercusio·n econo·mica y ambiental de los tributos, elaborar una comunicacio·n complementaria en la que se especifiquen con precisio·n y transparencia los criterios que debera·n presidir el establecimiento de los tributos?


title: PREGUNTA ESCRITA n. 313/98 del Luis CAMPOY ZUECO a la Comisión. Programa Urban

eurovoc_concepts:
EU programme
Navarre
Spain
operational programme
town planning

text: 2. 10. 98 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas C 304/75 (98/C 304/108) PREGUNTA ESCRITA P-0309/98 de Doeke Eisma (ELDR) a la Comisio·n (10 de febrero de 1998) Asunto: Impuesto sobre el carburante para aviones Durante el Consejo de Transportes de 11 de marzo de 1997, se pidio· a la Comisio·n que realizara un estudio sobre las consecuencias de una posible introduccio·n de un impuesto sobre el carburante para aviones. ¿Puede indicar la Comisio·n cua·ndo van a estar disponibles los resultados de dicho estudio? Respuesta del Sr. Monti en nombre de la Comisio·n (10 de marzo de 1998) En mayo de 1997, el Consejo Ecofin, en respuesta al informe de la Comisio·n (1) que establece el apartado 6 del art(cid:14)·culo 8 de la Directiva 92/81/CEE de 19 de octubre de 1992, relativa a la armonizacio·n de las estructuras del impuesto especial sobre los hidrocarburos (2), adopto· una resolucio·n en la que solicitaba a la Comisio·n ma·s informacio·n sobre todos los aspectos de la introduccio·n de un impuesto sobre el combustible de los aviones. A fin de responder a esta peticio·n, la Comisio·n ha emprendido un estudio para analizar las consecuencias que tendr(cid:14)·a la introduccio·n de un impuesto dentro de la Comunidad. El consorcio que realiza el estudio debe presentar el informe final a finales del verano de 1998. (1) COM(96)549 final. (2) DO L 316 de 31. 10. 1992. (98/C 304/109) PREGUNTA ESCRITA P-0313/98 de Luis Campoy Zueco (PPE) a la Comisio·n (10 de febrero de 1998) Asunto: Programa Urban ¿Podr(cid:14)·a informar la Comisio·n Europea de los proyectos espan(cid:152)oles seleccionados dentro del programa Urban 1997 y si hay alguno en concreto en la regio·n de Navarra? Respuesta de la Sra. Wulf-Mathies en nombre de la Comisio·n (4 de marzo de 1998) Dentro de la ampliacio·n de la iniciativa URBAN, las autoridades nacionales presentaron a la Comisio·n para su aprobacio·n el proyecto de programa operativo URBAN II › Espan(cid:152)a (1997-1999) que incluye proyectos de los ayuntamientos de Co·rdoba, Avile·s-Corvera, Santander, Albacete, Leo·n, Castello·n, Pontevedra, Telde, Murcia, Zaragoza, Santa Coloma de Gramenet y Palma de Mallorca. Ninguno de dichos proyectos afecta a la regio·n de Navarra. (98/C 304/110) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-0316/98 de Wilmya Zimmermann (PSE) a la Comisio·n (17 de febrero de 1998) Asunto: 9 de mayo, festividad europea comu·n La Comisio·n, en gran medida mediante el programa «Ciudadanos de Europa», ha sen(cid:152)alado la necesidad de conseguir que los ciudadanos y ciudadanas de la Unio·n Europea tambie·n puedan identificarse con e·sta. Una importante aportacio·n a este respecto sera·, ciertamente, la introduccio·n de la moneda u·nica. No obstante, la identificacio·n con la Unio·n Europea tambie·n podr(cid:14)·a conseguirse mediante una festividad comu·n. De esta manera, la bandera europea y el himno europeo se completar(cid:14)·an con un s(cid:14)·mbolo de unificacio·n que beneficiar(cid:14)·a a todos los ciudadanos y ciudadanas de Europa


title: Verordening (EG) Nr. 327/98 van de Commissie van 10 februari 1998 inzake de opening en de wijze van beheer van bepaalde tariefcontingenten voor de invoer van rijst en breukrijst

eurovoc_concepts:
export licence
import (EU)
import licence
rice
tariff quota
third country

text: 11. 2. 98 ‹ ‹NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen L 37/5 VERORDENING (EG) Nr. 327/98 VAN DE COMMISSIE van 10 februari 1998 inzake de opening en de wijze van beheer van bepaalde tariefcontingenten voor de invoer van rijst en breukrijst DE COMMISSIE VAN DE EUROPESE GEMEENSCHAPPEN, worden gespreid zodat hij beter door de communautaire markt kan worden geabsorbeerd; Gelet op het Verdrag tot oprichting van de Europese Gemeenschap, Gelet op Verordening (EG) nr. 1095/96 van de Raad van 18 juni 1996 betreffende de tenuitvoerlegging van de concessies in de lijst CXL die is opgesteld naar aanleiding van de voltooiing van de onderhandelingen in het kader van artikel XXIV, lid 6, van de GATT ( 1), inzonderheid op artikel 1, Gelet op Besluit 96/317/EG van de Raad van 13 mei 1996 betreffende de aanvaarding van de resultaten van het overleg met Thailand in het kader van artikel XXIII van de GATT (2), en met name op artikel 3, Overwegende dat bij de op grond van artikel XXIV, lid 6, van de GATT na toetreding van Oostenrijk, Finland en Zweden tot de Europese Gemeenschap gevoerde onder- handelingen is overeengekomen met ingang van 1 januari 1996 een jaarlijks contingent te openen voor de invoer van 63 000 ton halfwitte of volwitte rijst van GN-code 1006 30 met nulrecht en een contingent van 20 000 ton gedopte rijst van GN-code 1006 20 met een vast recht van 88 ECU/ton; dat deze contingenten zijn opgenomen in de lijst inzake de Europese Gemeenschap zoals bedoeld in artikel II, lid 1, onder a), van de GATT (1994); dat tijdens de onderhandelingen met de Verenigde Staten van Amerika is afgesproken dat nader overleg zou worden gevoerd over de tenuitvoerlegging van de overeenge- komen contingenten; dat dit overleg nog niet is afgerond; dat invoer krachtens tariefcontingenten van rijst uit de Verenigde Staten alleen na afloop van het overleg kan worden toegestaan; Overwegende dat bij het op grond van artikel XXIII van de GATT met Thailand gevoerde overleg is overeenge- komen een jaarlijks tariefcontingent te openen voor de invoer van 80 000 ton breukrijst van GN-code 1006 40 00 met een met 28 ECU/ton verlaagd invoerrecht; Overwegende dat in de voornoemde verbintenissen is bepaald dat bij het beheer van deze contingenten reke- ning moet worden gehouden met de traditionele leveran- ciers; Overwegende dat, om te voorkomen dat de invoer in het kader van deze contingenten de normale afzet van rijst uit de Gemeenschap verstoort, deze invoer over het jaar moet (1) PB L 146 van 20. 6. 1996, blz. 1. (2) PB L 122 van 22. 5. 1996, blz. 15. Overwegende dat, met het oog op een deugdelijk admini- stratief beheer van de voornoemde contingenten en om er inzonderheid voor te zorgen dat de vastgestelde hoeveel- heden niet worden overschreden, bijzondere bepalingen moeten worden vastgesteld inzake de indiening van aanvragen en de afgifte van certificaten; dat deze bepa- lingen hetzij een aanvulling vormen op, hetzij afwijken van de bepalingen van Verordening (EEG) nr. 3719/88 van de Commissie van 16 november 1988 houdende gemeenschappelijke uitvoeringsbepalingen inzake het stelsel van invoer-, uitvoer- en voorfixatiecertificaten voor landbouwproducten ( 3), laatstelijk gewijzigd bij Verorde- ning (EG) nr. 1404/97 ( 4); Overwegende dat moet worden aangegeven dat Verorde- ning (EG) nr. 1162/95 van de Commissie van 23 mei 1995 houdende bijzondere uitvoeringsbepalingen inzake het stelsel van invoer- en uitvoercertificaten in de sector granen en rijst (5), laatstelijk gewijzigd bij Verordening (EG) nr. 932/97 (6), van toepassing is in het kader van deze verordening; Overwegende dat de Commissie op 5 juli 1996 maatre- gelen voor de opening en het beheer van deze tariefcon- tingenten heeft aangenomen; dat deze maatregelen niet in overeenstemming waren met het advies van het Comit(cid:130) van beheer voor granen; dat de Commissie de toepassing ervan heeft uitgesteld en deze maatregelen aan de Raad heeft voorgelegd; dat de Raad overeenkomstig artikel 23, lid 3, van Verordening (EEG) nr. 1766/92 ( 7), laatstelijk gewijzigd bij Verordening (EG) nr. 923/96 van de Commissie (8), binnen een maand een andersluidend besluit heeft genomen; dat dit besluit betrekking heeft op de controle door de Commissie op de traditionele handelsstromen naar de Gemeenschap, met name op de invoer in kleine verpakkingen, alsmede op het risico van kruissubsidi(cid:137)ring; dat de maatregelen die de Raad in Verordening (EG) nr. 1522/96 van 24 juli 1996 inzake de opening en de wijze van beheer van bepaalde tariefcontin- genten voor de invoer van rijst en breukrijst ( 9), gewijzigd bij Verordening (EG) nr. 112/97 van de Commissie ( 10), heeft opgenomen, derhalve dienen te worden overgeno- men; (3) PB L 331 van 2. 12. 1988, blz. 1. (4) PB L 194 van 23. 7. 1997, blz. 5. (5) PB L 117 van 24. 5. 1995, blz. 2. (6) PB L 135 van 27. 5. 1997, blz. 2. (7) PB L 181 van 1. 7. 1992, blz. 21. (8) PB L 126 van 24. 5. 1996, blz. 37. (9) PB L 190 van 31. 7. 1996, blz. 1. (10) PB L 20 van 23. 1. 1997, blz. 23. L 37/6 ‹ ‹NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen 11. 2. 98 Overwegende dat, in het kader van het overleg dat met Thailand is gevoerd op grond van artikel XXIII van de GATT, een aanpassing is overeengekomen van sommige bepalingen van Verordening (EG) nr. 1522/96 betreffende met name de geldigheidstermijn van de invoercertificaten en de distributie van de contingenthoeveelheden voor volwitte rijst en voor breukrijst; dat het, om aan de uitkomst van dit overleg gevolg te geven, dienstig is de tranche van januari 1998 voor halfwitte en volwitte rijst van oorsprong uit Thailand en voor breukrijst van alle oorsprongen te completeren met een aanvullende tranche die wordt geopend vanaf de inwerkingtreding van deze verordening; Overwegende dat het dienstig is Verordening (EG) nr. 1522/96 in te trekken en te vervangen door deze verordening om een en ander eenvoudiger en overzichte- lijker te maken; Overwegende dat het Comit(cid:130) van beheer voor granen geen advies heeft uitgebracht binnen de door zijn voor- zitter bepaalde termijn, HEEFT DE VOLGENDE VERORDENING VASTGESTELD: 09. 4076), naar land van oorsprong als volgt onderver- deeld: — 38 721 ton uit de Verenigde Staten van Amerika, — 21 455 ton uit Thailand, — 1 019 ton uit Australi(cid:137), — 1 805 ton van andere oorsprong; b) 20 000 ton gedopte rijst van GN-code 1006 20 met een invoerrecht van 88 ECU/ton (volgnummer van het contingent 09. 4077), naar land van oorsprong als volgt onderverdeeld: — 10 429 ton uit Australi(cid:137), — 7 642 ton uit de Verenigde Staten van Amerika, — 1 812 ton uit Thailand, — 117 ton van andere oorsprong; c) 80 000 ton breukrijst van GN-code 1006 40 00 met een vermindering van 28 ECU/ton van het in de gecombi- neerde nomenclatuur vastgestelde recht (volgnummer van het contingent 09. 4078), naar land van oorsprong als volgt onderverdeeld: — 41 600 ton uit Thailand, — 12 913 ton uit Australi(cid:137), — 8 503 ton uit Guyana, Artikel 1 — 7 281 ton uit de Verenigde Staten van Amerika, — 9 703 ton van andere oorsprong. Er worden jaarlijkse tariefcontingenten geopend voor 1. de invoer in de Gemeenschap van: a) 63 000 ton halfwitte of volwitte rijst van GN-code 1006 30 met nulrecht (volgnummer van het contingent lid 3, In afwijking van artikel 2, 2. tweede alinea, worden de hoeveelheden rijst van oorsprong uit de Verenigde Staten, zoals bedoeld in lid 1, onder a) en b), niet uit hoofde van de tariefcontingenten ingevoerd zolang het overleg met de Verenigde Staten niet is afge- rond. Artikel 2 1. De afgifte van invoercertificaten voor de in ton uitgedrukte contingenthoeveelheden van artikel 1 wordt als volgt gespreid in tranches: a) voor het in artikel 1, lid 1, onder a), bedoelde contingent: Verenigde Staten Thailand Australi(cid:137) Andere oorsprong Januari April Juli September 9 681 10 727 — — 19 360 5 364 1 019 1 805 9 680 5 364 — — 20 408 27 548 15 044 — — — — — 11. 2. 98 ‹ ‹NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen L 37/7 b) voor het in artikel 1, lid 1, onder b), bedoelde contingent: Australi(cid:137) Verenigde Staten Thailand Andere oorsprong Januari April Juli September 2 608 1 911 — — 5 214 3 821 1 812 117 2 607 1 910 — — 4 519 10 964 4 517 — — — — — c) voor het in artikel 1, lid 1, onder c), bedoelde contingent: Thailand Australi(cid:137) Guyana Verenigde Staten Andere oorsprong Januari Juli 29 120 12 480 6 456 4 251 3 640 4 851 6 457 4 252 3 641 4 852 48 318 31 682 2. Om voor de maand januari 1998 evenwel de afgifte mogelijk te maken van certificaten voor de in lid 1, onder a), vermelde hoeveelheden van de producten van oorsprong uit Thailand en voor de in lid 1, onder c), vermelde hoeveelheden van alle oorsprongen, wordt een tranche geopend voor ten hoogste de volgende hoeveelhe- den: i) volwitte of halfwitte rijst van GN-code 1006 30: Voor hoeveelheden waarvoor geen certificaat is afgegeven op grond van de tranche voor de maand september, mogen voor elke oorsprong waarvoor het betrokken contingent geldt, invoercertificaten worden aangevraagd in het kader van een aanvullende tranche in de maand oktober overeenkomstig het bepaalde in artikel 4, lid 1, behalve voor de in lid 1, onder c), vastgestelde hoeveelhe- den. Oorsprong Hoeveelheid (in ton) Artikel 3 Thailand 5 363 ii) breukrijst van GN-code 1006 40 00: Oorsprong Hoeveelheid (in ton) Thailand Australi(cid:137) Guyana Verenigde Staten Andere oorsprong 18 720 3 227 2 125 1 820 2 426 De certificaataanvragen worden ingediend in de eerste tien werkdagen na de inwerkingtreding van deze verorde- ning. 3. De hoeveelheden waarvoor geen invoercertificaat is afgegeven op grond van een tranche, worden overge- dragen naar de volgende tranche van het betrokken contingent. Als de certificaataanvraag voor invoer in het kader van de in artikel 1 bedoelde hoeveelheden betrekking heeft op rijst en breukrijst van oorsprong uit Thailand en op rijst van oorsprong uit Australi(cid:137), moet zij vergezeld gaan van een uitvoercertificaat dat in respectievelijk de bijlagen I en II opgenomen model en is afgegeven door de in dezelfde bijlagen vermelde bevoegde instantie van deze landen. Het invullen van de vakken 7, 8 en 9 van bijlage I is facultatief. De uitvoercertificaten die worden afgegeven voor de in artikel 2 vermelde tran- ches zijn enkel geldig gedurende het betrokken jaar. is opgesteld volgens het Artikel 4 1. De certificaataanvragen worden bij de bevoegde autoriteiten in elke lidstaat ingediend in de eerste tien werkdagen van de maand die met de betrokken tranche overeenkomt. In afwijking van artikel 10 van Verordening (EG) nr. 2. 1162/95 bedraagt de zekerheid voor de invoercertificaten: — 46 ECU/ton voor het in artikel 1, lid 1, onder a), bedoelde contingent; L 37/8 ‹ ‹NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen 11. 2. 98 — 22 ECU/ton voor het in artikel 1, lid 1, onder b), bedoelde contingent; — 5 ECU/ton voor het in artikel 1, lid 1, onder c), bedoelde contingent. 3. In vak 8 van de certificaataanvraag en van het invoercertificaat wordt het land van oorsprong vermeld en wordt de vermelding „ja” aangekruist. 4. De certificaten bevatten in vak 24 (cid:130)(cid:130)n van de volgende vermeldingen: a) voor het in artikel 1, lid 1, onder a), bedoelde contin- gent: — Exenci(cid:155)n del derecho de aduana hasta la cantidad indicada en las casillas 17 y 18 del presente certifi- cado [Reglamento (CE) n o 327/98] — Toldfri op til den mængde, der er angivet i rubrik 17 og 18 i denne licens (Forordning (EF) nr. 327/98) — Zollfrei bis zu der in den Feldern 17 und 18 dieser Lizenz angegebenen Menge (Verordnung (EG) Nr. 327/98) — Atek ˜yr l ˜ewqi tgm pos ˜otgta pou oq˜ifetai sta tetqacym˜idia 17 jai 18 tou paq ˜omtor pistopoi- gtijo ˜u [jamomisl ˜or (EJ) aqih. 327/98] — Exemption from customs duty up to the quantity indicated in sections 17 and 18 of this licence (Regulation (EC) No 327/98) — Exemption du droit de douane jusqu’(cid:133) la quantit(cid:130) indiqu(cid:130)e dans les cases 17 et 18 du pr(cid:130)sent certi- ficat [R(cid:138)glement (CE) n o 327/98] — Erm(cid:132)ßigter Zollsatz von 88 ECU/t bis zu der in den Feldern 17 und 18 dieser Lizenz angegebenen Menge (Verordnung (EG) Nr. 327/98) — Leiyl ˜emor dasl ˜or se 88 Ecu am ˜a t ˜omo l ˜ewqi tgm pos ˜otgta pou oq˜ifetai sta tetqacym˜idia 17 jai 18 tou paq ˜omtor pistopoigtijo ˜u [jamo- misl ˜or (EJ) aqih. 327/98] — Reduced duty to ECU 88 per tonne up to the quantity indicated in sections 17 and 18 of this licence (Regulation (EC) No 327/98) — Droit r(cid:130)duit (cid:133) 88 (cid:130)cus par tonne jusqu’(cid:133) la quantit(cid:130) indiqu(cid:130)e dans les cases 17 et 18 du pr(cid:130)sent certi- ficat (R(cid:138)glement (CE) n o 327/98) — Dazio ridotto a 88 ECU/t limitatamente alla quan- tit(cid:133) indicata nelle caselle 17 e 18 del presente titolo (regolamento (CE) n. 327/98) — Verminderd douanerecht van 88 ECU/ton voor ten hoogste de in de vakken 17 en 18 van dit certificaat vermelde hoeveelheid (EG) nr. 327/98) (Verordening — Direito reduzido a 88 ecus/t at(cid:130) (cid:133) quantidade indi- cada nas casas 17 e 18 do presente certificado [Regulamento (CE) nº 327/98] — Tulli, joka on alennettu 88 ecuun/t t(cid:132)m(cid:132)n todis- tuksen kohdissa 17 ja 18 esitettyyn m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)(cid:132)n asti (asetus (EY) N:o 327/98) — Tullsatsen nedsatt till 88 ecu/t upp till den m(cid:132)ngd som anges i f(cid:132)lt 17 och 18 i denna licens (F(cid:148)rord- ning (EG) nr 327/98); c) voor het in artikel 1, lid 1, onder c), bedoelde contin- gent: — Esenzione dal dazio doganale limitatamente alla quantit(cid:133) indicata nelle caselle 17 e 18 del presente titolo [regolamento (CE) n. 327/98] — Derecho de aduana reducido de 28 ecus/t hasta la cantidad indicada en las casillas 17 y 18 del presente certificado [Reglamento (CE) n o 327/98] — Vrijgesteld van douanerecht voor ten hoogste de in de vakken 17 en 18 van dit certificaat vermelde hoeveelheid (Verordening (EG) nr. 327/98) — Isen(cid:135)˜ao de direito aduaneiro at(cid:130) (cid:133) quantidade indi- cada nas casas 17 e 18 do presente certificado [Regulamento (CE) nº 327/98] — Tullivapaa t(cid:132)m(cid:132)n todistuksen kohdissa 17 ja 18 esitettyyn m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)(cid:132)n asti (asetus (EY) N:o 327/98) — Tullfri upp till den m(cid:132)ngd som anges i f(cid:132)lt 17 och 18 i denna licens (F(cid:148)rordning (EG) nr 327/98); b) voor het in artikel 1, lid 1, onder b), bedoelde contin- gent: — Reduceret afgift med 28 ECU/t op til den mængde, der er angivet i rubrik 17 og 18 i denne licens (Forordning (EF) nr. 327/98) — Um 28 ECU/t erm(cid:132)ßigter Zollsatz bis zu der in den Feldern 17 und 18 dieser Lizenz angegebenen Menge (Verordnung (EG) Nr. 327/98) — Leiyl ˜emor dasl ˜or jat ˜a 28 Ecu am ˜a t ˜omo l ˜ewqi tgm pos ˜otgta pou oq˜ifetai sta tetqacym˜idia 17 jai 18 tou paq ˜omtor pistopoigtijo ˜u [jamo- misl ˜or (EJ) aqih. 327/98] — Reduced duty by ECU 28 per tonne up to the quantity indicated in sections 17 and 18 of this licence (Regulation (EC) No 327/98) — Derecho de aduana reducido a 88 ecus/t hasta la cantidad indicada en las casillas 17 y 18 del presente certificado [Reglamento (CE) n o 327/98] — Droit r(cid:130)duit de 28 (cid:130)cus par tonne jusqu’(cid:133) la quan- tit(cid:130) indiqu(cid:130)e dans les cases 17 et 18 du pr(cid:130)sent certificat (R(cid:138)glement (CE) n o 327/98) — Nedsat told 88 ECU/t op til den mængde, der er angivet i rubrik 17 og 18 i denne licens (Forord- ning (EF) nr. 327/98) — Dazio ridotto di 28 ECU/t limitatamente alla quan- tit(cid:133) indicata nelle caselle 17 e 18 del presente titolo (regolamento (CE) n. 327/98) 11. 2. 98 ‹ ‹NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen L 37/9 — Douanerecht verminderd met 28 ECU/ton voor ten hoogste de in de vakken 17 en 18 van dit certificaat vermelde hoeveelheid (EG) nr. 327/98) (Verordening — Direito reduzido em 28 ecus/t at(cid:130) (cid:133) quantidade indicada nas casas 17 e 18 do presente certificado [Regulamento (CE) nº 327/98] — Tulli, jota on alennettu 28 ecua/t t(cid:132)m(cid:132)n todistuksen kohdissa 17 ja 18 esitettyyn m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)(cid:132)n asti (asetus (EY) N:o 327/98) — Tullsatsen nedsatt med 28 ecu/t upp till den m(cid:132)ngd som anges i f(cid:132)lt 17 och 18 i denna licens (F(cid:148)rordning (EG) nr 327/98). 5. De invoercertificaataanvraag kan slechts worden aanvaard als de volgende voorwaarden zijn vervuld: — de aanvraag is ingediend door een natuurlijke persoon of rechtspersoon die, gedurende ten minste (cid:130)(cid:130)n van de drie aan de datum van indiening van deze aanvraag voorafgaande jaren een commerci(cid:137)le activiteit in de rijstsector heeft uitgeoefend of een invoercertificaat in de rijstsector heeft aangevraagd en die is ingeschreven in een openbaar register in een lidstaat; — de aanvrager heeft zijn aanvraag ingediend in de lidstaat waar hij in het openbaar register is ingeschre- ven. Als een aanvrager in twee of meer lidstaten aanvragen indient, wordt geen van de aanvragen aanvaard; — in gevallen waarin geen uitvoercertificaat vereist is, mag per aanvrager slechts (cid:130)(cid:130)n aanvraag worden inge- diend voor ten hoogste de maximumhoeveelheid die voor de betrokken tranche en het betrokken land van oorsprong is vastgesteld. Artikel 5 1. Binnen twee werkdagen, te rekenen vanaf de laatste dag van de termijn voor de indiening van de certificaat- aanvragen, delen de lidstaten de Commissie per telex of per telefax volgens het model in bijlage III de naar GN-code met acht cijfers en naar land van oorsprong uitgesplitste hoeveelheden waarvoor invoercertificaten zijn aangevraagd, het nummer van het aangevraagde certifi- caat, alsmede naam en adres van de aanvrager mee. Deze mededeling moet ook plaatsvinden wanneer in een lidstaat geen enkele aanvraag is ingediend. De bovenbedoelde gegevens mogen niet tegelijk met die over de overige invoercertificaataanvragen in de sector rijst worden meegedeeld, maar moeten op dezelfde wijze worden meegedeeld. 2. Binnen tien dagen, te rekenen vanaf de laatste dag van de termijn waarbinnen de lidstaten de gegevens moeten meedelen: — beslist de Commissie in welke mate gevolg kan worden gegeven aan de ingediende aanvragen. Indien de gevraagde hoeveelheden de voor de betrokken tranche en het betrokken land van oorsprong beschik- bare hoeveelheden overschrijden, stelt zij een uniform verminderingspercentage voor dat op elke aanvraag wordt toegepast, — stelt de Commissie de voor de volgende tranche en eventueel de voor de aanvullende tranche van oktober beschikbare hoeveelheden vast. 3. Als de in lid 2, eerste streepje, bedoelde verminde- ring leidt tot een of meer hoeveelheden van minder dan 20 ton per aanvraag, worden van het totaal van deze hoeveelheden partijen van telkens 20 ton en eventueel de nog resterende hoeveelheid door de lidstaat bij loting aan de gegadigde marktdeelnemers toegewezen. Artikel 6 1. Binnen drie werkdagen, te rekenen vanaf de bekend- making van de beslissing van de Commissie, worden de invoercertificaten afgegeven voor de uit de toepassing van artikel 5, lid 2, voortvloeiende hoeveelheden. Wanneer de hoeveelheid waarvoor het invoercertificaat wordt afgegeven lager is dan de gevraagde hoeveelheid, wordt het bedrag van de in artikel 4, lid 2, bedoelde zekerheid naar evenredigheid verminderd. 2. In afwijking van artikel 9 van Verordening (EEG) nr. 3719/88 zijn de uit het invoercertificaat voortvloeiende rechten niet overdraagbaar. Artikel 7 Artikel 5, 1. (EEG) nr. 3719/88 is niet van toepassing. lid 1, vierde streepje, van Verordening 2. De in artikel 1, lid 1, vastgestelde voordelen inzake douanerechten gelden niet voor de hoeveelheden die worden ingevoerd op grond van de bij artikel 8, lid 4, van Verordening (EEG) nr. 3719/88 toegestane tolerantie. Artikel 33, lid 5, van Verordening (EEG) nr. 3719/88 3. is van toepassing. 4. In afwijking van artikel 6 van Verordening (EG) nr. 1162/95 en overeenkomstig artikel 21, lid 2, van Verorde- ning (EEG) nr. 3719/88: — zijn de invoercertificaten voor gedopte rijst, halfwitte rijst of volwitte rijst geldig vanaf de datum van de feitelijke afgifte tot het einde van de derde daaropvol- gende maand; — zijn de invoercertificaten voor breukrijst geldig vanaf de datum van de feitelijke afgifte tot en met 31 december van het jaar waarin het certificaat is afgege- ven. De geldigheidstermijn van de invoercertificaten loopt evenwel in geen geval langer dan 31 december van het jaar waarin zij zijn afgegeven. Artikel 8 De bevoegde instanties delen de Commissie per telex of per telefax, volgens het model in bijlage III, de volgende gegevens mee: L 37/10 ‹ ‹NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen 11. 2. 98 — uiterlijk in de twee werkdagen na de afgifte van de certificaten, de naar GN-code met acht cijfers en naar land van oorsprong uitgesplitste hoeveelheden waar- voor invoercertificaten zijn afgegeven, de datum van afgifte en het nummer van het certificaat, alsmede naam en adres van de certificaathouder; — uiterlijk twee maanden na het verstrijken van de certificaat, de naar geldigheidstermijn van elk GN-code met acht cijfers, naar verpakking en naar land van oorsprong uitgesplitste hoeveelheden die daadwerkelijk in het vrije verkeer zijn gebracht, de datum waarop zij in het vrije verkeer zijn gebracht, het nummer van het gebruikte certificaat, alsmede naam en adres van de certificaathouder. Deze mededeling moet ook plaatsvinden ingeval geen enkel certificaat is afgegeven of geen invoer heeft plaats- gevonden. profiteert en uitvoer waarop de normale invoerrechten worden geheven. Indien aan een van de hierboven bedoelde criteria is 2. voldaan, en met name indien de invoer van rijst in verpakkingen van 5 kilo of minder meer bedraagt dan 33 428 ton, en in ieder geval op jaarbasis, brengt de Commissie bij de Raad verslag uit, zo nodig vergezeld van passende voorstellen om verstoring van de communau- taire rijstsector te voorkomen. 3. De hoeveelheden die zijn ingevoerd in verpakkingen als bedoeld in lid 2 en in het vrije verkeer zijn gebracht, worden overeenkomstig artikel 22 van Verordening (EEG) nr. 3719/88 in het betrokken invoercertificaat vermeld. Artikel 10 Artikel 9 1. Verordening (EG) nr. 1522/96 wordt ingetrokken. 1. De Commissie houdt toezicht op de hoeveelheden die krachtens deze verordening worden ingevoerd, met name om vast te stellen: 2. Het bepaalde in deze verordening is niet van toepas- sing op de invoercertificaten die zijn afgegeven op grond van Verordening (EG) nr. 1522/96. — in hoeverre de traditionele handelsstromen, in termen van volume en aanbiedingsvorm, naar de uitgebreide Gemeenschap wezenlijk zijn gewijzigd, en — of er sprake is van subsidi(cid:137)ring tussen uitvoer die rechtstreeks van het bepaalde in deze verordening Artikel 11 Deze verordening treedt in werking op de derde dag volgende op die van haar bekendmaking in het Publica- tieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen. Deze verordening is verbindend in al haar onderdelen en is rechtstreeks toepasselijk in elke lidstaat. Gedaan te Brussel, 10 februari 1998. Voor de Commissie Franz FISCHLER Lid van de Commissie ANEXO I — BILAG I — ANHANG I — PAQAQTGLAI — ANNEX I — ANNEXE I — ALLEGATO I — BIJLAGE I — ANEXO I — LIITE I — BILAGA I Export certificate No. DEPARTMENT OF FOREIGN TRADE MINISTRY OF COMMERCE GOVERNMENT OF THAILAND Special form either for semi-milled or milled rice (Code No 1006 30), husked rice (code No 1006 20), or broken rice (code No 1006 40 00) Export certificate subject to Regulation (EC) No. /96 1. Exporter (name, address and country) 2. Importer (name, address and country) Name: Address: Country: 3. Shipped per (cid:30) Conventional (cid:30) Container Name: Address: Country: 4. Country/ Countries of destination in EC 5. Type of Thai rice/R. S. Code No 6. Weight metric tonnes 7. Packing Gross weight: Net weight: 8. No and date of invoice 9. No and date of B/L We hereby certify that the abovementioned products are produced in and are exported from Thailand. Department of Foreign Trade. Name and signature of authorized official and stamp Date of issue. THIS CERTIFICATE IS VALID FOR 120 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF ISSUE AND IN ANY CASE ONLY UNTIL 31 DECEMBER OF THE YEAR OF ISSUE For use of EC authorities Serial No. „ANEXO II — BILAG II — ANHANG II — PAQAQTGLA II — ANNEX II — ANNEXE II — ALLEGATO II — BIJLAGE II — ANEXO II — LIITE II — BILAGA II BIJLAGE II COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA REPRESENTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES AND ENERGY Export certificate No. EXPORT LICENCE for semi-milled or milled rice (code No 1006 30) and husked rice (code No 1006 20) 1. Exporter Name: Address: Country: 2. Importer Name: Address: Country: 3. Country/Countries of destination in EU 4. Type of rice/specification 5. Consignment weight metric tonnes Milled/Semi-milled (code No 1006 30) Net weight: Husked/Brown (code No 1006 20) Department of Primary Industries and Energy by its Delegate. Signature Date of issue. Date of Expiry. For use by EU authorities ” BIJLAGE III RIJST — Verordening (EG) nr. 327/98 Aanvraag voor een invoercertificaat ( 1) Afgifte van een invoercertificaat ( 1) In het vrije verkeer brengen ( 1) Geadresseerde: DG VI-C-2 — Fax: (0032-2) 296 60 21 Afzender: Datum Nummer van het certificaat GN-code Hoeveelheid (ton) Land van oorsprong Naam en adres van aanvrager/houder Verpakking @ 5 kg (1) Doorhalen wat niet van toepassing is. 1 1. 2. 9 8 N L P u b l i c a t i e b l a d v a n d e E u r o p e s e G e m e e n s c h a p p e n L 3 7 / 1 5


title: SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE Nr. 327/98 von Dominique SOUCHET an die Kommission. Gemeinschaftliche Beihilfen für die Versorgung der Regionen in äußerster Randlage - Auswirkungen auf die Beschäftigung

eurovoc_concepts:
aid system
cereals
economic consequence
labour market
peripheral region
supply

text: C 304/78 DE Amtsblatt der Europa¤ischen Gemeinschaften 2. 10. 98 Vertritt die Kommission in Anbetracht der Tatsache, da(cid:223) die durchschnittliche Ko¤rpergro¤(cid:223)e der verschiedenen Bevo¤lkerungsgruppen in Europa betra¤chtlich variiert, nicht die Auffassung, da(cid:223) die EU sich bemu¤hen sollte, die Spielra¤ume fu¤r die entsprechenden Normen zu versta¤rken anstatt einheitliche nicht zufriedenstellende Normen zu besta¤tigen? Ist die Kommission nicht der Ansicht, da(cid:223) der CEN angehalten werden sollte, bei der Festlegung von Normen mit den Gruppen zusammenarbeiten, die Menschen von gro(cid:223)er Statur bzw. geringer Ko¤rpergro¤(cid:223)e vertreten? Antwort von Herrn Kinnock im Namen der Kommission (2. Ma¤rz 1998) Der Herr Abgeordnete wird auf die Antwort der Kommission auf seine schriftliche Anfrage P-1916/97 (1) verwiesen. (1) ABl. C 21 vom 22. 1. 1998. (98/C 304/114) SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE P-0327/98 von Dominique Souchet (I-EDN) an die Kommission (10. Februar 1998) Betrifft: Gemeinschaftliche Beihilfen fu¤r die Versorgung der Regionen in a¤u(cid:223)erster Randlage › Auswirkungen auf die Bescha¤ftigung In den beiden letzten Jahren sind die gemeinschaftlichen Beihilfen fu¤r die Versorgung der Regionen in a¤u(cid:223)erster Randlage mit Getreide sehr stark zuru¤ckgegangen. Dies fu¤hrt zu einer Schwa¤chung der Produktionszweige, welche von diesen Erzeugnissen abha¤ngen (Mu¤hlen, Futtermittelverarbeitungsbetriebe), und birgt zusa¤tzliche Gefahren fu¤r die Bescha¤ftigung in diesen Regionen, die bereits zu denen geho¤ren, die am sta¤rksten in der Gemeinschaft unter der Arbeitslosigkeit und der Unterbescha¤ftigung zu leiden haben. Ko¤nnte die Kommission sich dazu a¤u(cid:223)ern, welche Ma(cid:223)nahmen sie einzuleiten gedenkt, um diese Beihilfen wieder auf fru¤herem Niveau einzufu¤hren und so zahlreiche Arbeitspla¤tze zu retten? Antwort von Herrn Santer im Namen der Kommission (17. Ma¤rz 1998) Die Kommission ist sich sehr wohl der praktischen Probleme bewu(cid:223)t, die derzeit mit der besonderen Versorgungsregelung verbunden sind, wie sie durch die Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 3763/91 des Rates vom 16. Dezember 1991 mit Sonderma(cid:223)nahmen fu¤r bestimmte Agrarerzeugnisse zugunsten der franzo¤sischen u¤berseeischen Departements (1), durch die Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1600/92 des Rates vom 15. Juni 1992 zum Erla(cid:223) von Sonderma(cid:223)nahmen fu¤r bestimmte landwirtschaftliche Erzeugnisse zugunsten der Azoren und Madeiras (2) und durch die Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1601/92 des Rates vom 15. Juni 1992 zur Einfu¤hrung von Sonderma(cid:223)nahmen fu¤r bestimmte landwirtschaftliche Erzeugnisse zugunsten der Kanarischen Inseln (2) festgelegt worden sind. Die Reform der Gemeinsamen Agrarpolitik (GAP) und der Abschlu(cid:223) der Uruguay- Runde fu¤hrten zu einer schrittweisen Angleichung zwischen Weltmarkt- und Gemeinschaftspreisen, die wiederum einen Ru¤ckgang der Beihilfen fu¤r Gemeinschaftserzeugnisse zur Folge hatte, die im Rahmen der besonderen Versorgungsregelung in Gebiete mit extremer Randlage geliefert werden. Die Kommission ist sich daru¤ber im klaren, da(cid:223) die praktischen Probleme, die mit dieser Regelung verbunden sind, fu¤r die Volkswirtschaften dieser Gebiete in extremer Randlage nachteilige Folgen haben. Im Rahmen der geltenden Rechtsvorschriften pru¤ft sie daher diese Berechnungsweise, um eine Lo¤sung zu finden, die einen Ausgleich der strukturbedingten Nachteile ermo¤glicht, die insbesondere auf die geographische Entfernung dieser Regionen zuru¤ckzufu¤hren sind; hierdurch soll die Entwicklung der Produktivsektoren gefo¤rdert werden. (1) ABl. L 356 vom 24. 12. 1991. (2) ABl. L 173 vom 27. 6. 1992


title: Decyzja Komisji z dnia 10 lutego 1998 r. zmieniająca decyzję 97/569/WE ustalającą tymczasowe wykazy zakładów państw trzecich, z których Państwa Członkowskie dopuszczają przywóz produktów mięsnychTekst mający znaczenie dla EOG

eurovoc_concepts:
health certificate
health control
import
meat product
third country

text: 03/t. 22 PL Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej 305 31998D0163 24. 2. 1998 DZIENNIK URZĘDOWY WSPÓLNOT EUROPEJSKICH L 53/23 DECYZJA KOMISJI z dnia 10 lutego 1998 r. zmieniająca decyzję 97/569/WE ustalającą tymczasowe wykazy zakładów państw trzecich, z których Państwa Członkowskie dopuszczają przywóz produktów mięsnych (Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG) (98/163/WE) KOMISJA WSPÓLNOT EUROPEJSKICH, uwzględniając Traktat ustanawiający Wspólnotę Europejską, uwzględniając decyzję Rady 95/408/WE z dnia 22 czerwca 1995 r. w sprawie warunków ustalania, na okres przejściowy, tymczasowych wykazów zakładów państw trzecich, z których Państwom Członkowskim zezwala się na przywóz niektórych produktów pochodzenia zwierzęcego, produktów rybołówstwa lub żywych małży (1), ostatnio zmienioną decyzją 97/34/WE (2), w szczególności jej art. 2 ust. 4, a także mając na uwadze, co następuje: tymczasowe wykazy zakładów produkujących produkty mięsne w państwach trzecich zostały opracowane w decyzji Komisji 97/569/WE (3), ostatnio zmienionej decyzją 98/9/WE (4); Singapur, Słowenia i Szwajcaria przesłały wykaz zakładów wytwarzających produkty mięsne, w odniesieniu do których odpowiedzialne za to organy poświadczają, iż są one zgodne z regułami wspólnotowymi; środki przewidziane w niniejszej decyzji są zgodne z opinią Stałego Komitetu Weterynaryjnego, PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZĄ DECYZJĘ: Artykuł 1 Załącznik do niniejszej decyzji dodaje się do Załącznika do decyzji 97/569/WE. Niniejszą decyzję stosuje się od dnia 1 lutego 1998 r. Artykuł 2 Niniejsza decyzja skierowana jest do Państw Członkowskich. Artykuł 3 Sporządzono w Brukseli, dnia 10 lutego 1998 r. tego powodu można z tymczasowy wykaz zakładów wytwarzających produkty mięsne w odniesieniu do Singapuru, Słowenii i Szwajcarii; Należy zatem odpowiednio zmienić decyzję 97/569/WE; sporządzić W imieniu Komisji Franz FISCHLER Członek Komisji (1) Dz. U. L 243 z 11. 10. 1995, str. 17. (2) Dz. U. L 13 z 16. 1. 1997, str. 33. (3) Dz. U. L 234 z 26. 8. 1997, str. 16. (4) Dz. U. L 3 z 7. 1. 1998, str. 12. 306 PL Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej 03/t. 22 ANEXO — BILAG — ANHANG — ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ — ANNEX — ANNEXE — ALLEGATO — BIJLAGE — ANEXO — LIITE — BILAGA „País: SINGAPUR — Land: SINGAPORE — Land: SINGAPUR — Χώρα: ΣΙΓΚΑΠΟΥΡΗ — Country: SINGAPORE — Pays: SINGAPOUR — Paese: SINGAPORE — Land: SINGAPORE — País: SINGAPURA — Maa: SINGAPORE — Land: SINGAPORE 1 2 3 4 VPH-ME-001 Effort Holdings Pte Ltd VPH-ME-002 Yeo Hiap Seng Ltd Singapore Singapore VPH-ME-003 Amoy Canning Corporation (Singapore Ltd) Singapore VPH-CS-001 QB Food Trading Pte Ltd VPH-CS-004 Ben Foods (S) Pte Ltd Singapore Singapore 5 PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP País: ESLOVENIA — Land: SLOVENIEN — Land: SLOWENIEN — Xώρα: ΣΛOBENIA — Country: SLOVENIA — Pays: SLOVÉNIE — Paese: SLOVENIA — Land: SLOVENIE — País: ESLOVÉNIA — Maa: SLOVENIA — Land: SLOVENIEN 1 47 71 Droga PC Argo Perutnina 2 3 4 Izola Ptuj 5 PMP PMP País: SUIZA — Land: SCHWEIZ — Land: SCHWEIZ — Хώρα: ΕΛΒΕTIA — Country: SWITZERLAND — Pays: SUISSE — Paese: SVIZZERA — Land: ZWITSERLAND — País: SUÍÇA — Maa: SVEITSI — Land: SCHWEIZ 1 25 38 49 61 201 202 205 212 213 214 215 2 3 4 Hero Konserven Frisco-Findus AG Dyna SA Knorr AG Gurtner AG Bündner Fleisch Mani AG Albert Speiss AG SWF Fleischwaren AG Lucul SA Maggi AG Lenzburg Rorschach Fribourg Thayngen Trin Churwalden Frauenkirch Landquart Payerne Kemptthal Fleischtrocknerei Churwalden AG Churwalden 5 PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP 03/t. 22 PL Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej 307 1 216 224 225 227 228 229 239 242 254 275 288 293 294 299 301 302 303 304 305 306 309 311 312 315 2 3 4 Hügli AG Hilcona AG Haco AG Gustav Spiess AG E. Sutter AG Kocherhans & Schär AG Gehrig AG Sirpig AG H. Ospelt Anstalt Albert Spiess AG Steinach Schaan Gümlingen Berneck Gossau Churwalden Klus Brusio Bendern Schiers Frigemo Produktion Chur. J. Caprez-Danuser AG Chur Salumi San Pietro SA Natura Fleischtrocknerei F. +B. Meinen Pizoler AG Gautschi AG Oswald AG Cambio Fleischwaren AG Morgia AG Fleischtrocknerei Churwalden AG Gemperli AG Fredag AG Konservenfabrik Bischofszell AG Möfag Mösli Fleischwaren AG Stabio Tinizong Bern Sargans Utzendorf Steinhausen St. Gallen Lyss Chur St. Gallen Root Bischofzell Zuzwil 5 PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP PMP”