title: COMMON POSITION (EC) No 32/98 adopted by the Council on 30 March 1998 with a view to adopting European Parliament and Council Directive 98/.../EC of ..., on the supplementary supervision of insurance undertakings in an insurance group

eurovoc_concepts:
EU action
exchange of information
health policy
international cooperation
public health

text: 30. 6. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 204/1 I (Information) COUNCIL COMMON POSITION (EC) No 32/98 adopted by the Council on 30 March 1998 with a view to adopting European Parliament and Council Directive 98/. /EC of. , on the supplementary supervision of insurance undertakings in an insurance group (98/C 204/01) THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 57(2) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1), Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (2), Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 189b of the Treaty (3), (1) Whereas the first Council Directive 73/239/EEC of laws, 24 July 1973 on the coordination of regulations and administrative provisions relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of direct insurance other than life assurance (4) and the first Council Directive 79/267/EEC of 5 March (1) OJ C 341, 19. 12. 1995, p. 16. (2) OJ C 174, 17. 6. 1996, p. 16. (3) Opinion of the European Parliament of 23 October 1997 (OJ C 339, 10. 11. 1997, p. 136), Council Common Position of 30 March 1998 and Decision of the European Parliament of. (not yet published in the Official Journal). (4) OJ L 228, 16. 8. 1973, p. 3. Directive as last amended by 1979 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the taking up and pursuit of life assurance (5) require insurance undertakings to have solvency margins; the business of direct of (2) Whereas, under Council Directive 92/49/EEC of 18 June 1992 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to direct insurance other than life assurance and amending Directives 73/239/EEC and 88/357/EEC (third insurance Directive) (6) and Council non-life Directive 92/96/EEC of 10 November 1992 on the coordination and laws, administrative provisions relating to direct life assurance and amending Directives 79/267/EEC and 90/619/EEC (third life assurance Directive) (7) the taking up and the pursuit of the business of insurance are subject to the granting of a single official authorisation issued by the authorities of insurance the Member State undertaking has (home Member State); whereas such authorisation allows an undertaking to carry on business throughout registered office in which an regulations its (5) OJ L 63, 13. 3. 1979, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 95/26/EC. (6) OJ L 228, 11. 8. 1992, p. 1. Directive as amended by Directive 95/26/EC. (7) OJ L 360, 9. 12. 1992, p. 1. Directive as amended by Directive 95/26/EC (OJ L 168, 18. 7. 1995, p. 7). Directive 95/26/EC. C 204/2 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 30. 6. 98 the the Community, under either right of establishment or the freedom to provide services; whereas the competent authorities of home Member States are responsible for monitoring the insurance undertakings, financial health of including their solvency; insurance undertakings (3) Whereas measures concerning the supplementary supervision of in an insurance group should enable the authorities supervising an insurance undertaking to form a more soundly based judgment of its financial situation; whereas such supplementary supervision should take into account certain undertakings which are not at present subject to supervision under Community Directives; whereas this Directive does not in any way imply that Member States are required to undertake supervision of those undertakings considered individually; therefore be (4) Whereas insurance undertakings in a common insurance market engage in direct competition with each other and the rules concerning capital equivalent; requirements must whereas, to that end, the criteria applied to determine supplementary supervision must not be left solely to the discretion of Member States; whereas the adoption of common basic rules will be in the best interests of the Community in that it will prevent distortions of competition; whereas it is necessary to eliminate certain divergences between the laws of the Member States as regards insurance the undertakings that are part of an insurance group are subject; to which prudential rules supervision of any undertaking or non-member-country insurance undertaking and, under different rules, for the supplementary insurance company whose parent undertaking is an insurance holding company, a reinsurance undertaking, a non-member-country insurance undertaking or a mixed-activity company; whereas the supervision of individual insurance undertakings by the competent authorities remains the essential principle of insurance supervision; insurance holding (8) Whereas it is necessary to calculate an adjusted solvency situation insurance undertakings for forming part of an insurance group; whereas different methods are applied by the competent authorities in the Community to take into account the effects on the financial situation of an insurance undertaking attributable to the fact that it belongs to an insurance group; whereas this Directive lays down three methods to effect that calculation; whereas the principle is accepted that these methods are prudentially equivalent; reinsurance undertaking (9) Whereas the solvency of a related subsidiary insurance undertaking of an insurance holding company, or non-member-country insurance undertaking may be affected by the financial resources of the group of which it is a part and by the distribution of financial resources within that group; whereas the competent authorities should be provided with the means of exercising supplementary supervision and of taking appropriate measures at the level of the insurance undertaking where its solvency is or may be jeopardised; (5) Whereas the approach adopted consists in bringing about such harmonisation as is essential, necessary and sufficient to achieve the mutual recognition of prudential control systems in this field; whereas the aim of this Directive is in particular to protect the interests of insured persons; (6) Whereas certain provisions of this Directive define minimum standards; whereas a home Member State may lay down stricter rules for insurance undertakings authorised by its own competent authorities; (7) Whereas this Directive for the supplementary insurance company which is a participating undertaking in at reinsurance insurance undertaking, least one provides supervision of any (10) Whereas the competent authorities should have access to all the information relevant to the exercise of supplementary supervision; whereas cooperation between the authorities responsible for the supervision of insurance undertakings as well as between those authorities and the authorities responsible for the supervision of other financial sectors should be established; (11) Whereas intra-group transactions can affect the financial position of an insurance undertaking; whereas the competent authorities should be in a to exercise general supervision over position certain types of such intra-group operations and take appropriate measures at the level of the insurance undertaking where its solvency is or may be jeopardised, 30. 6. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 204/3 HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: Article 1 Definitions For the purposes of this Directive: (a) insurance undertaking means an undertaking which has received official authorisation in accordance with Article 6 of Directive 73/239/EEC or Article 6 of Directive 79/267/EEC; (b) non-member-country insurance undertaking means an undertaking which would require authorisation in accordance with Article 6 of Directive 73/239/EEC or Article 6 of Directive 79/267/EEC if it had its registered office in the Community; an insurance (c) reinsurance undertaking means an undertaking, other a than non-member-country insurance undertaking, the main business of which consists in accepting risks ceded by insurance undertaking, a non-member-country an reinsurance or insurance undertakings; undertaking undertaking other or (d) parent undertaking means a parent undertaking within the meaning of Article 1 of Directive 83/349/EEC (1) and any undertaking which, in the opinion of the competent authorities, effectively exercises a dominant influence over another undertaking; (e) subsidiary a undertaking means subsidiary undertaking within the meaning of Article 1 of Directive 83/349/EEC and any undertaking over which, in the opinion of the competent authorities, a parent undertaking effectively exercises a dominant influence. All subsidiaries of subsidiary undertakings shall also be considered subsidiaries of the parent undertaking which those is at undertakings; the head of (f) participation means participation within the meaning of Article 17, sentence, of Directive 78/660/EEC (2) or the holding, directly or indirectly, of 20 % or more of the voting rights or capital of an undertaking; first (g) participating undertaking means an undertaking which is either a parent undertaking or another undertaking which holds a participation; (1) Seventh Council Directive 83/349/EEC of 13 June 1983 based on Article 54(3)(g) of the Treaty on consolidated accounts (OJ L 193, 18. 7. 1983, p. 1). Directive as last amended by the 1994 Act of Accession. (2) Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 based on Article 54(3)(g) of the Treaty on the annual accounts of certain types of companies (OJ L 222, 14. 8. 1978, p. 11). Directive as last amended by the 1994 Act of Accession. (h) related undertaking means either a subsidiary or other undertaking in which a participation is held; (i) insurance holding company means a parent undertaking the main business of which is to acquire and hold participations in subsidiary undertakings, where those subsidiary undertakings are exclusively reinsurance or mainly insurance undertakings, undertakings or non-member-country insurance least of such subsidiary undertakings, one at undertakings being an insurance undertaking; than an non-member-country (j) mixed-activity insurance holding company means a insurance parent undertaking, other insurance a undertaking, undertaking, a reinsurance undertaking or an insurance holding company, which includes at least one its subsidiary undertakings; insurance undertaking among (k) competent authorities means the national authorities law or regulation to which are empowered by supervise insurance undertakings. Article 2 Cases of application of supplementary supervision of insurance undertakings to In addition 1. the provisions of Directives 73/239/EEC and 79/267/EEC which lay down the rules for the supervision of insurance undertakings, Member States shall provide supervision of any insurance undertaking which is a participating undertaking in at least one insurance undertaking, reinsurance undertaking, or non-member-country insurance undertaking shall be supplemented in the manner prescribed in Articles 5, 6, 8 and 9. 2. Every insurance undertaking the parent undertaking of which is an insurance holding company, a reinsurance undertaking or insurance undertaking shall be subject to supplementary supervision in the manner prescribed in Articles 5(2), 6, 8 and 10. a non-member-country 3. Every insurance undertaking the parent undertaking of which is a mixed-activity insurance holding company shall be subject to supplementary supervision in the manner prescribed in Articles 5(2), 6 and 8. Article 3 Scope of supplementary supervision supervision supplementary 1. The exercise of in accordance with Article 2 shall in no way imply that the competent authorities are required to play a supervisory role in relation to the non-member-country insurance undertaking, or mixed-activity insurance holding company or reinsurance undertaking taken individually. insurance company holding C 204/4 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 30. 6. 98 2. The supplementary supervision shall account: take into — related undertakings of the insurance undertaking, — participating undertaking, undertakings in the insurance — related undertakings of a participating undertaking in the insurance undertaking referred to in Articles 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10. 3. Member States may decide not to take into account in the supplementary supervision referred to in Article 2 undertakings having in a non-member country where there are legal impediments to the transfer of the necessary information, without prejudice to the provisions of Annex I, point 2. 5, and of Annex II, point 4. registered office their Furthermore, the competent authorities responsible for exercising supplementary supervision may in the cases listed below decide on a case-by-case basis not to take an undertaking supplementary in into supervision referred to in Article 2: account the — if the undertaking which should be included is of negligible interest with respect to the objectives of the supplementary insurance supervision undertakings, of — if the inclusion of the financial situation of the undertaking would be inappropriate or misleading with respect to the objectives of the supplementary supervision of insurance undertakings. Article 4 Competent authorities for exercising supplementary supervision 1. Supplementary supervision shall be exercised by the competent authorities of the Member State in which the insurance undertaking has received official authorisation under Article 6 of Directive 73/239/EEC or Article 6 of Directive 79/267/EEC. holding insurance 2. Where insurance undertakings authorised in two or more Member States have as their parent undertaking the same reinsurance undertaking, non-member-country insurance undertaking or mixed-activity the competent authorities of the Member States concerned may reach agreement as to which of them will be responsible for exercising supplementary supervision. insurance holding company, company, 3. Where a Member State has more than one competent authority for the prudential supervision of insurance undertakings and reinsurance undertakings, such Member State shall take the requisite measures to organise coordination between those authorities. Article 5 Availability and quality of information 1. Member States shall prescribe that the competent authorities shall require that every insurance undertaking subject to supplementary supervision shall have adequate internal control mechanisms in place for the production of any data and information relevant for the purposes of such supplementary supervision. 2. Member States shall take the appropriate steps to ensure that there are no legal impediments within their jurisdiction preventing the undertakings that are subject to the supplementary supervision and their related undertakings and participating undertakings from exchanging among themselves any information relevant for the purposes of such supplementary supervision. Article 6 Access to information 1. Member States shall provide that their competent for exercising supplementary authorities responsible supervision shall have access to any information which would be relevant for the purpose of supervision of an insurance undertaking subject to such supplementary supervision. The competent authorities may address themselves directly to the relevant undertakings referred to in Article 3(2) to obtain the necessary information only if such information has been requested from the insurance undertaking and has not been supplied by it. 2. Member States shall provide that their competent authorities may carry out within territory, themselves or through the intermediary of persons whom they appoint for that purpose, on-the-spot verification of the information referred to in paragraph 1 at: their — the insurance undertaking subject to supplementary supervision, — subsidiary undertakings of that insurance undertaking, — parent undertakings of that insurance undertaking, — subsidiary undertakings of a parent undertaking of that insurance undertaking. in applying this Article, the competent 3. Where, authorities of one Member State wish in specific cases to verify important information concerning an undertaking situated in another Member State which is a related insurance undertaking, a subsidiary undertaking, a parent undertaking or a subsidiary of a parent undertaking of the insurance undertaking subject to supplementary supervision, they must ask the competent authorities of that other Member State to have that verification carried 30. 6. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 204/5 out. The authorities which receive such a request must act on it within the limits of their jurisdiction by carrying out the authorities making the request to carry it out or by allowing an auditor or expert to carry it out. themselves, by allowing the verification Article 7 Cooperation between competent authorities 1. Where insurance undertakings established in different Member States are directly or indirectly related or have a common participating undertaking, the competent authorities of each Member State shall communicate to one another on request all relevant information which may allow or facilitate the exercise of supervision pursuant to this Directive and shall communicate on their own initiative any information which appears to them to be essential for the other competent authorities. 2. Where an insurance undertaking and either a credit institution as defined in Directive 77/780/EEC (1) or an investment firm as defined in Directive 93/22/EEC (2), or both, are directly or indirectly related or have a common participating undertaking, the competent authorities and the authorities with public responsibility the supervision of those other undertakings shall cooperate closely. Without respective those authorities shall provide one responsibilities, another with any information likely to simplify their task, in particular within the framework of this Directive. prejudice their for to Information received pursuant to this Directive and, 3. in particular, any exchange of information between competent authorities which is provided for in this Directive shall be subject to the obligation of professional secrecy defined in Article 16 of Directive 92/49/EEC and Article 15 of Directive 92/96/EEC. (a) an insurance undertaking and: (i) a related undertaking; undertaking of the insurance (ii) a participating undertaking in the insurance undertaking; (iii) a related undertaking of a participating undertaking in the insurance undertaking; (b) an insurance undertaking and a natural person who holds a participation in: (i) the insurance undertaking or any of its related undertakings; (ii) a participating undertaking in the insurance undertaking; (iii) a related undertaking of a participating undertaking in the insurance undertaking. These transactions concern in particular: — loans, — guarantees and off-balance-sheet transactions, — elements eligible for the solvency margin, — investments, — reinsurance operations, — agreements to share costs. 2. To this end, Member States shall require at least annual reporting by the insurance undertakings to the competent authorities of significant transactions as provided for in paragraph 1. If, on the basis of this information, it appears that the solvency of the insurance undertaking is, or may be, jeopardised, take appropriate measures at the level of the insurance undertaking. competent authority shall the Article 8 Intra-group transactions Article 9 Adjusted solvency requirement 1. Member States shall provide that the competent authorities exercise general supervision over transactions between: (1) First Council Directive 77/780/EEC of 12 December 1977 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions (OJ L 322, 17. 12. 1977, p. 30). Directive as last amended by Directive 96/13/EC (OJ L 66, 16. 3. 1996, p. 15). (2) Council Directive 93/22/EEC of 10 May 1993 on investment services in the securities field (OJ L 141, 11. 6. 1993, p. 27). Directive as last amended by Directive 97/9/EC (OJ L 84, 26. 3. 1997, p. 22). In the case referred to in Article 2(1), Member States 1. shall require that an adjusted solvency calculation be carried out in accordance with Annex I. 2. Any related undertaking, participating undertaking or related undertaking of a participating undertaking shall be included in the calculation referred to in paragraph 1. If the calculation referred 3. in paragraph 1 demonstrates that the adjusted solvency is negative, the competent authorities shall take appropriate measures at the level of the insurance undertaking in question. to C 204/6 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 30. 6. 98 Article 10 Reinsurance undertakings, insurance holding companies and non-member-country insurance undertakings 1. In the case referred to in Article 2(2), Member States shall require the method of supplementary supervision to be applied in accordance with Annex II. 2. In the case referred to in Article 2(2), the calculation shall include all related undertakings of the insurance holding company, the reinsurance undertaking or the non-member-country the manner provided for in Annex II. insurance undertaking, in 3. If, on the basis of this calculation, the competent authorities conclude that the solvency of a subsidiary insurance undertaking of the insurance holding company, the reinsurance undertaking or the non-member-country insurance undertaking is, or may be, jeopardised, they shall take appropriate measures at the level of that insurance undertaking. 3. When Member States adopt the measures referred to in paragraph 1, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference on the occasion of their official publication. The methods of making such reference shall be laid down by Member States. 4. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the main provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive. 5. Not later than. (*) the Commission shall submit to the Insurance Committee a report on the application of this Directive and, if necessary, on the need for further harmonisation. Article 12 Entry into force This Directive shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. Article 11 Implementation Article 13 Addressees 1. Member States shall adopt not later than. (*) the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof. 2. Member States shall provide that the provisions referred to in paragraph 1 shall first apply to the supervision of accounts for financial years beginning on 1 January. (**) or during that calendar year. This Directive is addressed to the Member States. Done at. For the European Parliament For the Council The President The President (*) 18 months after the entry into force of this Directive. (**) 1 January of the year following the year mentioned in paragraph 1. (*) Five years after the date referred to in paragraph 2. 30. 6. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 204/7 ANNEX I CALCULATION OF THE ADJUSTED SOLVENCY OF INSURANCE UNDERTAKINGS 1. CHOICE OF CALCULATION METHOD AND GENERAL PRINCIPLES A. Member States shall provide that the calculation of the adjusted solvency of insurance undertakings referred to in Article 2(1) shall be carried out according to one of the methods described in point 3. A Member State may, however, provide for the competent authorities to authorise or impose the application of a method set out in point 3 other than that chosen by the Member State. B. Proportionality The calculation of the adjusted solvency of an insurance undertaking shall take account of the proportional share held by the participating undertaking in its related undertakings. ‘Proportional share’ means either, where method 1 or method 2 described in point 3 is used, the proportion of the subscribed capital that is held, directly or indirectly, by the participating undertaking or, where method 3 described in point 3 is used, the percentages used for the establishment of the consolidated accounts. However, whichever method is used, when the related undertaking is a subsidiary undertaking and has a solvency deficit, the total solvency deficit of the subsidiary has to be taken into account. However, where, in the opinion of the competent authorities, the responsibility of the parent undertaking owning a share of the capital is limited strictly and unambiguously to that share of the capital, such competent authorities may give permission for the solvency deficit of the subsidiary undertaking to be taken into account on a proportional basis. C. Elimination of double use of solvency margin elements C. 1. General treatment of solvency margin elements Regardless of the method used for the calculation of the adjusted solvency of an insurance undertaking, the double use of elements eligible for the solvency margin among the different insurance undertakings taken into account in that calculation must be eliminated. For this purpose, when calculating the adjusted solvency of an insurance undertaking and where the methods described in point 3 do not provide for it, the following amounts shall be eliminated: — the value of any asset of that insurance undertaking which represents the financing of elements eligible for the solvency margin of one of its related insurance undertakings, — the value of any asset of a related insurance undertaking of that insurance undertaking which represents the financing of elements eligible for the solvency margin of that insurance undertaking, — the value of any asset of a related insurance undertaking of that insurance undertaking which represents the financing of elements eligible for the solvency margin of any other related insurance undertaking of that insurance undertaking. C. 2. Treatment of certain elements Without prejudice to the provisions of section C. 1: — profit reserves and future profits arising in a related life assurance undertaking of the insurance undertaking for which the adjusted solvency is calculated, and — any subscribed but not paid-up capital of a related insurance undertaking of the insurance undertaking for which the adjusted solvency is calculated, C 204/8 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 30. 6. 98 may only be included in the calculation in so far as they are eligible for covering the solvency margin requirement of that related undertaking. However, any subscribed but not paid-up capital which represents a potential obligation on the part of the participating undertaking shall be entirely excluded from the calculation. Any subscribed but not paid-up capital of the participating insurance undertaking which represents a potential obligation on the part of a related insurance undertaking shall also be excluded from the calculation. Any subscribed but not paid-up capital of a related insurance undertaking which represents a potential obligation on the part of another related insurance undertaking of the same participating insurance undertaking shall be excluded from the calculation. C. 3. Transferability If the competent authorities consider that certain elements eligible for the solvency margin of a related insurance undertaking other than those referred to in section C. 2 cannot effectively be made available to cover the solvency margin requirement of the participating insurance undertaking for which the adjusted solvency is calculated, those elements may be included in the calculation only in so far as they are eligible for covering the solvency margin requirement of the related undertaking. C. 4. The sum of the elements referred to in sections C. 2 and C. 3 may not exceed the solvency margin requirement of the related insurance undertaking. D. Elimination of the intra-group creation of capital When calculating adjusted solvency, no account shall be taken of any element eligible for the solvency margin arising out of reciprocal financing between the insurance undertaking and: — a related undertaking, — a participating undertaking, — another related undertaking of any of its participating undertakings. Furthermore, no account shall be taken of any element eligible for the solvency margin of a related insurance undertaking of the insurance undertaking for which the adjusted solvency is calculated when the element in question arises out of reciprocal financing with any other related undertaking of that insurance undertaking. In particular, reciprocal financing exists when an insurance undertaking, or any of its related undertakings, holds shares in, or makes loans to, another undertaking which, directly or indirectly, holds an element eligible for the solvency margin of the first undertaking. E. The competent authorities shall ensure that the adjusted solvency is calculated with the same frequency as that laid down by Directives 73/239/EEC and 79/267/EEC for calculating the solvency margin of insurance undertakings. The value of the assets and liabilities shall be assessed according to the relevant provisions of Directives 73/239/EEC, 79/267/EEC and 91/674/EEC (1). 2. APPLICATION OF THE CALCULATION METHODS 2. 1. Related insurance undertakings The adjusted solvency calculation shall be carried out in accordance with the general principles and methods set out in this Annex. (1) Council Directive 91/674/EEC of 19 December 1991 on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings (OJ L 374, 31. 12. 1991, p. 7). 30. 6. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 204/9 In the case of all methods, where the insurance undertaking has more than one related insurance undertaking, the adjusted solvency calculation shall be carried out by integrating each of these related insurance undertakings. In cases of successive participations (for example, where an insurance undertaking is a participating undertaking in another insurance undertaking which is also a participating undertaking in an insurance undertaking), the adjusted solvency calculation shall be carried out at the level of each participating insurance undertaking which has at least one related insurance undertaking. Member States may waive calculation of the adjusted solvency of an insurance undertaking: — if the undertaking is a related undertaking of another insurance undertaking authorised in the same Member State, and that related undertaking is taken into account in the calculation of the adjusted solvency of the participating insurance undertaking, or — if the insurance undertaking is a related undertaking either of an insurance holding company or of a reinsurance undertaking which has its registered office in the same Member State as the insurance undertaking, and both the holding insurance company or the reinsurance undertaking and the related insurance undertaking are taken into account in the calculation carried out. Member States may also waive calculation of the adjusted solvency of an insurance undertaking if it is a related insurance undertaking of another insurance undertaking, a reinsurance undertaking or an insurance holding company which has its registered office in another Member State, and if the competent authorities of the Member States concerned have agreed to grant exercise of the supplementary supervision to the competent authority of the latter Member State. In each case, the waiver may be granted only if the competent authorities are satisfied that the elements eligible for the solvency margins of the insurance undertakings included in the calculation are adequately distributed between those undertakings. Member States may provide that where the related insurance undertaking has its registered office in a Member State other than that of the insurance undertaking for which the adjusted solvency calculation is carried out, the calculation shall take account, in respect of the related undertaking, of the solvency situation as assessed by the competent authorities of that other Member State. 2. 2. Related reinsurance undertakings When calculating the adjusted solvency of an insurance undertaking which is a participating undertaking in a reinsurance undertaking, this related reinsurance undertaking shall be treated, solely for the purposes of the calculation, by analogy with a related insurance undertaking, applying the general principles and methods described in this Annex. To this end, a notional solvency requirement shall be established for each related reinsurance undertaking on the basis of the same rules as are laid down in Article 16(2) of (5) of Directive 73/239/EEC or Article 19 of Directive 79/267/EEC. However, in the event of significant difficulty in applying these rules, the competent authorities may permit the notional life solvency requirement to be calculated on the basis of the first result as set out in Article 16(3) of Directive 73/239/EEC. The same elements as are found in Article 16(1) of Directive 73/239/EEC and in Article 18 of Directive 79/267/EEC shall be recognised as eligible for the notional solvency margin. The value of the assets and liabilities shall be assessed according to the same rules as are laid down in those Directives and in Directive 91/674/EEC. 2. 3. Intermediate insurance holding companies When calculating the adjusted solvency of an insurance undertaking which holds a participation in an insurance undertaking, a related reinsurance undertaking, or an insurance undertaking in a non-member country through an insurance holding company, the situation of the intermediate insurance holding company is taken into account. For the sole purpose of this calculation, to be undertaken in accordance with the general principles and methods described in this Annex, this insurance holding company shall be treated as if it were an insurance undertaking subject to a zero solvency requirement and were subject to the same conditions as are laid down in Article 16(1) of Directive 73/239/EEC or in Article 18 of Directive 79/267/EEC in respect of elements eligible for the solvency margin. C 204/10 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 30. 6. 98 2. 4. Related insurance or reinsurance undertakings having their registered office in non-member countries A. Related non-member country insurance undertakings When calculating the adjusted solvency of an insurance undertaking which is a participating undertaking in a non-member country insurance undertaking, the latter shall be treated solely for the purposes of the calculation, by analogy with a related insurance undertaking, by applying the general principles and methods described in this Annex. However, where the non-member country in which that undertaking has its registered office makes it subject to authorisation and imposes on it a solvency requirement at least comparable to that laid down in Directives 73/239/EEC or 79/267/EEC, taking into account the elements of cover of that requirement, Member States may provide that the calculation shall take into account, as regards that undertaking, the solvency requirement and the elements eligible to satisfy that requirement as laid down by the non-member country in question. B. Related non-member country reinsurance undertakings Notwithstanding section 2. 2, when calculating the adjusted solvency of an insurance undertaking which is a participating undertaking in a reinsurance undertaking with its registered office in a non-member country, and subject to the same conditions as those set out in point A above, Member States may provide that the calculation shall take account, as regards the latter undertaking, of the own-funds requirement and the elements eligible to satisfy that requirement as laid down by the non-member country in question. Where only the insurance undertakings of that non-member country are subject to such provisions, the notional own-funds requirement on the related reinsurance undertaking and the elements eligible to satisfy that notional requirement may be calculated as if the undertaking in question were a related insurance undertaking of that non-member country. 2. 5. Non-availability of the necessary information Where information necessary for calculating the adjusted solvency of an insurance undertaking, concerning a related undertaking with its registered office in a Member State or a non-member country, is not available to the competent authorities, for whatever reason, the book value of that undertaking in the participating insurance undertaking shall be deducted from the elements eligible for the adjusted solvency margin. In that case, the unrealised gains connected with such participation shall not be allowed as an element eligible for the adjusted solvency margin. 3. CALCULATION METHODS Method 1: Deduction and aggregation method The adjusted solvency situation of the participating insurance undertaking is the difference between: (i) the sum of: (a) the elements eligible for the solvency margin of the participating insurance undertaking, and b) the proportional share of the participating insurance undertaking in the elements eligible for the solvency margin of the related insurance undertaking and (ii) the sum of: (a) the book value in the participating insurance undertaking of the related insurance undertaking, and (b) the solvency requirement of the participating insurance undertaking, and (c) the proportional share of the solvency requirement of the related insurance undertaking. 30. 6. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 204/11 Where the participation in the related insurance undertaking consists, wholly or in part, of an indirect ownership, then item (ii)(a) shall incorporate the value of such indirect ownership, taking into account the relevant successive interests; and items (i)(b) and (ii)(c) shall include the corresponding proportional shares of the elements eligible for the solvency margin of the related insurance undertaking and of the solvency requirement of the related insurance undertaking, respectively. Method 2: Requirement deduction method The adjusted solvency of the participating insurance undertaking is the difference between: (i) the sum of the elements eligible for the solvency margin of the participating insurance undertaking and (ii) the sum of: (a) the solvency requirement of the participating insurance undertaking, and (b) the proportional share of the solvency requirement of the related insurance undertaking. When valuing the elements eligible for the solvency margin, participations within the meaning of this Directive are valued by the equity method, in accordance with the option set out in Article 59(2)(b) of Directive 78/660/EEC. Method 3: Accounting consolidation-based method The calculation of the adjusted solvency of the participating insurance undertaking shall be carried out on the basis of the consolidated accounts. The adjusted solvency of the participating insurance undertaking is the difference between: the elements eligible for the solvency margin calculated on the basis of consolidated data, and (a) either the sum of the solvency requirement of the participating insurance undertaking and of the proportional shares of the solvency requirements of the related insurance undertakings, based on the percentages used for the establishment of the consolidated accounts, (b) or the solvency requirement calculated on the basis of consolidated data. The provisions of Directives 73/239/EEC, 79/267/EEC and 91/674/EEC shall apply for the calculation of the elements eligible for the solvency margin and of the solvency requirement based on consolidated data. ANNEX II SUPPLEMENTARY SUPERVISION FOR INSURANCE UNDERTAKINGS THAT ARE SUBSIDIARIES INSURANCE HOLDING COMPANY, A REINSURANCE UNDERTAKING OR A OF AN NON-MEMBER COUNTRY INSURANCE UNDERTAKING 1. In the case of two or more insurance undertakings referred to in Article 2(2) which are the subsidiaries of an insurance holding company, a reinsurance undertaking or a non-member-country insurance undertaking and which are established in different Member States, the competent authorities shall ensure that the method described in this Annex is applied in a consistent manner. The competent authorities shall exercise the supplementary supervision with the same frequency as that laid down by Directives 73/239/EEC and 79/267/EEC for calculating the solvency margin of insurance undertakings. C 204/12 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 30. 6. 98 2. Member States may waive the calculation provided for in this Annex with regard to an insurance undertaking: — if that insurance undertaking is a related undertaking of another insurance undertaking and if it is taken into account in the calculation provided for in this Annex carried out for that other undertaking, — if that insurance undertaking and one or more other insurance undertakings authorised in the same Member State have as their parent undertaking the same insurance holding company, reinsurance undertaking or non-member-country insurance undertaking, and the insurance undertaking is taken into account in the calculation provided for in this Annex carried out for one of these other undertakings, — if that insurance undertaking and one or more other insurance undertakings authorised in other Member States have as their parent undertaking the same insurance holding company, reinsurance undertaking or non-member-country insurance undertaking, and an agreement granting exercise of the supplementary supervision covered by this Annex to the supervisory authority of another Member State has been concluded in accordance with Article 4(2). In the case of successive participations (for example: an insurance holding company or a reinsurance undertaking which is itself owned by another insurance holding company, a reinsurance undertaking or a non-member country insurance undertaking), Member States may apply the calculations provided for in this Annex only at the level of the ultimate parent undertaking of the insurance undertaking which is an insurance holding company, a reinsurance undertaking or a non-member-country insurance undertaking. 3. The competent authorities shall ensure that calculations analogous to those described in Annex I are insurance holding company, reinsurance undertaking or the carried out at non-member-country insurance undertaking. level of the The analogy shall consist in applying the general principles and methods described in Annex I at the level of the insurance holding company, reinsurance undertaking or non-member-country insurance undertaking. For the sole purpose of this calculation, the parent undertaking shall be treated as if it were an insurance undertaking subject to: — a zero solvency requirement where it is an insurance holding company, — a notional solvency requirement as provided for in section 2. 2 of Annex I where it is a reinsurance undertaking, or as provided for in section 2. 4(B) of Annex I where it is a reinsurance undertaking with its registered office in a non-member country, — a solvency requirement determined according to the principles of section 2. 4(A) of Annex I, where it is a non-member-country insurance undertaking, and is subject to the same conditions as laid down in Article 16(1) of Directive 73/239/EEC or in Article 18 of Directive 79/267/EEC as regards the elements eligible for the solvency margin. 4. Non-availability of the necessary information Where information necessary for the calculation provided for in this Annex, concerning a related undertaking with its registered office in a Member State or a non-member country, is not available to the competent authorities, for whatever reason, the book value of that undertaking in the participating undertaking shall be deducted from the elements eligible for the calculation provided for in this Annex. In that case, the unrealised gains connected with such participation shall not be allowed as an element eligible for the calculation. 30. 6. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 204/13 STATEMENT OF THE COUNCIL’S REASONS I. INTRODUCTION On 4 October 1995 the Commission submitted a proposal for a Directive based on Article 57(2) of the EC Treaty. The Economic and Social Committee delivered its opinion on 27 March 1996. The European Parliament delivered its opinion on 23 October 1997. Further to that opinion, the Commission submitted an amended proposal on 28 January 1998. The Council adopted its common position, under Article 189b of the Treaty, on 30 March 1998. II. OBJECTIVE The proposal is designed to provide insurance supervision authorities with more effective means of ascertaining the true solvency of an insurance undertaking which is part of an insurance group in order to preclude circumvention of the solvency margin requirements by groups, in particular by means of double gearing of capital. The proposal imposes no new introduces supervision capital requirements on mechanisms. insurance undertakings but simply III. COMMON POSITION In its first-reading opinion, the European Parliament proposed 24 amendments. The Commission’s amended proposal accepted 14 amendments in their entirety and four in part. The Council’s common position is close to the Commission’s position on the amendments, incorporating (at least in part) the substance of 19 of them. Of the five amendments disallowed: — one (amendment No 8) was unacceptable because it unduly restricted the scope of the Directive by limiting supplementary supervision to parent-subsidiary relations within an insurance group, — four were unacceptable because they introduced factors extraneous to the text as it stands. IV. ANALYSIS OF THE COMMON POSITION 1. Recitals The European Parliament did not amend any of the recitals. The Council made the amendments it considered necessary to align them with the content of the Articles, at the same time trying to maintain overall consistency. C 204/14 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 30. 6. 98 2. Non-member-country insurance undertaking (Article 1 of the common position) The Council inserted a definition of ‘non-member-country insurance undertaking’, the concept having been introduced into the Directive further to European Parliament amendments Nos 6 and 7. 3. Definition of ‘parent undertaking’ and ‘subsidiary undertaking’ (Article 1(d) and (e) of the common position) ‘parent undertaking’ and The Council widened the concepts of ‘subsidiary undertaking’ as requested by the European Parliament in amendments Nos 1 and 2, i. e. by referring to Article 1 of Directive 83/349/EEC as a whole and not just to paragraph 1 as in the initial proposal. However, the Council thought that the last sentence of the initial proposal should stand, so that the competent authorities could consider whether a dominant influence existed in cases other than those referred to in Article 1 of Directive 83/349/EEC. 4. Definition of ‘participation’ (Article 1(f)) The Council adopted a definition of participation which takes partial account of European Parliament amendment No 4 by introducing a reference to the first sentence of Article 17 of Directive 78/660/EEC and adopting the criterion of a ‘durable link’. In addition, the holding, directly or indirectly, of 20 % or more of an undertaking’s voting rights or capital is regarded as ‘participation’ within the meaning of the Directive. The Council adopted this wording on the grounds that legal certainty is essential in a concept which determines whether or not the Directive applies. 5. Definition of ‘insurance holding company’ and ‘mixed-activity insurance holding company’ (Article 1(i) and (j)) The Council incorporated the European Parliament’s proposed amendments Nos 6 and 7 in full. 6. Scope (Article 2) The Council decided that Article 2 of the initial proposal duplicated Article 3(1), (2) and (3) thereof, which clearly indicated which insurance undertakings are subject to the supplementary supervision established by the Directive. The Council therefore deleted the proposed text of Article 2 and replaced it with the first three paragraphs taken from Article 3 of the initial proposal. As regards the text of paragraph 1, the Council, as indicated under section III, was unable to endorse European Parliament amendment No 8, designed to limit the scope of the Directive to parent-subsidiary relations within a group. The proposed restriction would limit the effectiveness of the Directive considerably and make it easier to circumvent. In addition, the Council amended paragraphs 1 and 2 to include in the Directive’s scope insurance groups in which a non-member-country insurance undertaking is a parent or related undertaking of an insurance undertaking. The Council saw no reason why, in a world of ever-increasing globalisation, they should be excluded. In paragraph 2, reinsurance undertakings which are the ‘parent’ of an insurance undertaking were also included. This approach makes for more standardised treatment of mixed insurance-reinsurance groups, whatever the position of the reinsurance undertaking within the group. 30. 6. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 204/15 7. Scope of supplementary supervision (Article 3) A new paragraph 2 was inserted in Article 3 to make the scope of supplementary supervision explicit. This paragraph does not alter the scope of supplementary supervision but simply spells out what was implicit in the text of the initial proposal. In paragraph 3, the Council took account of the concerns expressed in European Parliament amendment No 9 by clarifying the powers of the Member States and the competent authorities in exceptional cases of non-application of supplementary supervision. 8. Competent authorities responsible for exercising supplementary supervision (Article 4) The Council inserted a new paragraph 2 to establish which authorities are competent where insurance undertakings authorised in two Member States and subject to supplementary supervision have the same parent undertaking. 9. Availability and quality of information (Article 5) This Article was slightly recast for clarity’s sake, but is unchanged in substance. 10. Access to information (Article 6) Article 6(1) was amended to take account of European Parliament amendment No 10 by stipulating that the competent authorities may address themselves directly to undertakings in the group only if the necessary information requested has not been supplied by the insurance undertaking. In paragraph 2 the Council wished to make clear which undertakings are liable to on-the-spot verification in order to avoid future problems of interpretation. 11. Cooperation between competent authorities (Article 7) In paragraph 1, the Council specified the extent of the obligations of the competent authorities regarding reciprocal communication. The text of the common position therefore distinguishes between relevant information, to be communicated at the request of the competent authorities of another Member State, and essential information, which the competent authorities must communicate on their own initiative. Paragraph 2 was slightly altered to allow for the possibility of an insurance undertaking being related at the same time to a credit institution and an investment firm. The Council took the view that this possibility was already implicit in the text of the original proposal. 12. Intra-group transactions (Article 8) The Council considered that supplementary supervision of intra-group transactions should not have the sole aim of checking that transactions are conducted under normal market conditions, but should also check any transaction that could have a negative effect on the solvency of the insurance undertaking, even if conducted on normal market conditions. The common position therefore establishes general supervision of intra-group transactions and stipulates that the competent authority shall take appropriate measures at the level of the insurance undertaking if it appears that the solvency of the insurance undertaking is, or may be, jeopardised. C 204/16 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 30. 6. 98 The layout of Article 8 was also slightly altered for the sake of clarity. 13. Adjusted solvency requirement (Article 9) The Council incorporated European Parliament amendment No 11 in Article 9(1). It amended paragraph 2 to take account of the definitions in Article 1, which necessitate a reference to non-member-country undertakings here, and of the new wording of Article 3(2). 14. Application of the method of supplementary supervision in accordance with Annex II (Article 10) The wording of this Article was adjusted in line with the new wording of Article 2(2) and Annex II. The Council regards these as purely formal amendments. 15. Implementation (Article 11) Article 11 allows 18 months for transposition of the Directive into national law and states that it is to apply to the first accounting year following transposition. The former paragraph 2, providing for a transitional period for the participation threshold definition, was dropped because Member States indicated that they did not intend to avail themselves of such a period. Finally, a new paragraph 5 was inserted, in substance reproducing European Parliament amendment No 12, although the report is to be submitted five, not three, years after the date of application of the Directive. 16. Annex I, point 1 Annex I was extensively recast and supplemented to set out clearly all the principles to be taken into account in applying the calculation methods, in particular: (i) Point 1 A: The Council thought it necessary to spell out how and by whom the method should be chosen. In addition, to take account of Parliament’s amendment No 13, it introduced a reference to Article 2(1), where the first insurance Directives are cited. (ii) Point 1 B: Here the principle of proportionality is established, in the spirit of Parliament’s amendment No 15. (iii) Point 1 C: This point deals with the general treatment of solvency margin elements, taking partial account of amendment No 14 on the treatment of some of those elements, and stating more explicitly the need to eliminate the double gearing of capital and the conditions of transferability of the elements to be used in calculating the solvency margin. (iv) Point 1 D: This point reproduces point B of the original proposal on the elimination of the intra-group creation of capital. (v) Point 1 E: This point reproduces the former point D, with the addition of a reference to Directive 91/674/EEC as requested in Parliament’s amendment No 16. 30. 6. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 204/17 17. Annex I, point 2 Point 2 was recast so that all the general provisions on application of the calculation methods are set out before the methods come to be described (point 3 now does this). The following amendments were also made: (i) Point 2. 1: The fourth and sixth paragraphs take account of Parliament’s amendment No 17 by providing for the derogation in the original proposal to be extended to cross-border situations. (ii) Point 2. 2: A derogation is provided for in the event of major difficulties in applying the calculation rules. (iii) Point 2. 3: Parliament’s amendments Nos 18 and 19 were inserted, with slight adjustments for the sake of clarity. (iv) Point 2. 4: 2. 4(A) sets out the exact treatment to be accorded to related in Parliament’s insurance undertakings, as requested non-member-country amendment No 27. A similar provision on related non-member-country reinsurance undertakings was inserted. (v) Point 2. 5: Covers cases where the information necessary for calculating the adjusted solvency is not available. (vi) Point 4 of the text of the proposal was deleted in response to Parliament’s amendment No 21. 19. Annex I, point 3 The description of the methods was improved and slightly expanded to include interpretative explanations. 20. Annex II Annex II was simplified; it lays down a single method of calculation, sufficient for the purposes of supplementary supervision of the insurance undertakings covered. Calculations analogous to those described in Annex I are provided for


title: PREGUNTA ESCRITA n. 952/98 del Riitta MYLLER a la Comisión. Cooperación entre los Fondos estructurales y los instrumentos de Phare y Tacis

eurovoc_concepts:
Central and Eastern European Countries
EU programme
Structural Funds
coordination of financing
cross-border cooperation
frontier region

formats: html pdf print

text: C 354/44 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 19. 11. 98 (98/C 354/80) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-0949/98 de Mark Watts (PSE) a la Comisio·n (30 de marzo de 1998) Asunto: Repercusiones del GATT/OMC sobre la proteccio·n de los animales Los temores relativos a los desaf(cid:14)·os impuestos por el GATT ya han llevado a la UE a atenuar fuertemente dos de sus medidas principales en materia de proteccio·n de los animales, en particular la prohibicio·n de la importacio·n de pieles procedentes de pa(cid:14)·ses que utilizan los cepos y la prohibicio·n de comercializar cosme·ticos ensayados en animales. El GATT/OMC podr(cid:14)·a disuadir a la UE de la introduccio·n de nuevas medidas destinadas a la proteccio·n de los animales, ya que, si bien la UE puede, en virtud del GATT, prohibir el uso de un sistema cruel en su propio territorio, no puede prohibir la importacio·n de productos derivados de animales sometidos a dicho sistema. ¿Esta· de acuerdo la Comisio·n en que el GATT/OMC supone una amenaza para la introduccio·n de mejoras en las normas relativas a la proteccio·n de los animales? ¿Esta· la Comisio·n a favor de que la UE tome la iniciativa en la Conferencia ministerial de la OMC que se celebrara· en mayo en Ginebra e intente persuadir a las dema·s partes contratantes de la OMC de la necesidad de reformar el GATT/OMC con objeto de asegurarse de que no impida a las partes contratantes introducir medidas genuinamente destinadas a garantizar mejoras en las normas relativas a la de proteccio·n de los animales? Respuesta de Sir Leon Brittan en nombre de la Comisio·n (7 de mayo de 1998) Es cierto que las obligaciones comunitarias a tenor del acuerdo de la Organizacio·n Mundial del Comercio (OMC) son uno de los elementos que deben tenerse en cuenta en cualquier pol(cid:14)·tica que pueda afectar al comercio, incluidas las mencionada por Su Sen(cid:152)or(cid:14)·a. Sin embargo, como sen(cid:152)ala Su Sen(cid:152)or(cid:14)·a, el Acuerdo General sobre Aranceles Aduaneros y Comercio (GATT)/OMC no impide adoptar medidas que se consideren necesarias para la proteccio·n de los animales en el territorio de la Comunidad. La Comisio·n considera que no puede imponer unilateralmente a terceros pa(cid:14)·ses las normas comunitarias sobre proteccio·n de los animales. Por ejemplo, las normas de la OMC no permiten a Comunidad prohibir las importaciones de productos cosme·ticos so·lo por haber sido ensayados en animales, aunque la Comunidad prohiba la comercializacio·n de productos comunitarios ensayados en animales. En lugar de prohibir la importacio·n de estos productos, la Comunidad deber(cid:14)·a centrarse en el establecimiento de normas multilaterales sobre la proteccio·n de los animales. La Comunidad debe empezar por intentar convencer a sus socios comerciales de que modifiquen sus pol(cid:14)·ticas en el sentido que considera correcto. Los consumidores en Europa, a su vez, deber(cid:14)·an estar ser capaces de tomar decisiones informadas sobre los productos que compran, por ejemplo a trave·s de sistemas de etiquetado. Dado que la proteccio·n de los animales esta· siendo cada vez ma·s pertinente a efectos del comercio internacional, la cuestio·n podra· plantearse en el futuro en el contexto de la OMC. La posibilidad de modificar las normas de la OMC para tener en cuenta la cuestio·n general de la proteccio·n de los animales sera· tratada en el contexto de la determinacio·n de los objetivos de negociacio·n de la Comunidad para la pro·xima etapa de las negociaciones de la OMC. (98/C 354/81) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-0952/98 de Riitta Myller (PSE) a la Comisio·n (30 de marzo de 1998) Asunto: Cooperacio·n entre los Fondos estructurales y los instrumentos de Phare y Tacis Durante el pasado an(cid:152)o se han aplicado distintos programas de cooperacio·n, mediante los cuales se han destinado fondos a la cooperacio·n con pa(cid:14)·ses exteriores a la Unio·n. Por ejemplo, los nuevos instrumentos de los programas incluidos en CBC han sido importantes en el a·mbito de dicha cooperacio·n. Sin embargo la utilizacio·n de los programas no ha evolucionado. Diferenciar su importancia mejorar(cid:14)·a la coordinacio·n de los programas y los resultados. Para ello bastar(cid:14)·a aumentar los fondos legales para la cooperacio·n entre la UE y los terceros pa(cid:14)·ses


title: PREGUNTA ESCRITA n. 962/98 del Florus WIJSENBEEK a la Comisión. Utilización de bicicletas de servicio

eurovoc_concepts:
Belgium
European official
Netherlands
commercial vehicle
public awareness campaign
transport policy
two-wheeled vehicle
urban area
urban transport

formats: html print


title: Neuvoston asetus (EY) N:o 731/98, annettu 30 päivänä maaliskuuta 1998, satelliittiseurantaa koskevan kokeiluhankkeen perustamisesta NAFO-sääntelyalueella annetun asetuksen (EY) N:o 3070/95 muuttamisesta

eurovoc_concepts: North-West Atlantic Fisheries Organisation

text: 2. 4. 98 ‹ FI ‹ Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)jen virallinen lehti L 102/5 NEUVOSTON ASETUS (EY) N:o 731/98, annettu 30 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) maaliskuuta 1998, satelliittiseurantaa koskevan kokeiluhankkeen perustamisesta NAFO-s(cid:132)(cid:132)ntely- alueella annetun asetuksen (EY) N:o 3070/95 muuttamisesta EUROOPAN UNIONIN NEUVOSTO, joka ottaa huomioon Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)n perustamissopi- muksen ja erityisesti sen 43 artiklan, ottaa huomioon komission ehdotuksen (1), ottaa huomioon Euroopan parlamentin lausunnon (2), toteutettava olisi t(cid:132)yt(cid:132)nt(cid:148)(cid:148)npanemiseksi yhteis(cid:148)n tasolla, toimenpiteit(cid:132) kyseisen ehdotuksen ja kiireellisyyden ja yhteisten etujen vuoksi t(cid:132)t(cid:132) asetusta olisi sovellettava 1 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)st(cid:132) tammikuuta 1998, sek(cid:132) katsoo, ett(cid:132) ON ANTANUT T(cid:142)M(cid:142)N ASETUKSEN: perustavat NAFO-s(cid:132)(cid:132)ntelyalueella asetuksen (EY) N:o 3070/95 (3) 1 artiklan mukaisesti j(cid:132)sen- kalastavien valtiot alusten satelliittiseurantaa koskevia kokeiluhankkeita 1 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n tammikuuta 1996 ja 31 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n joulukuuta 1997 v(cid:132)lisen(cid:132) aikana, NAFOn kalastuskomissio hyv(cid:132)ksyi 19 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) syyskuuta 1997 ehdotuksen satelliittiseurantahankkeen jatkamisesta 31 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)(cid:132)n joulukuuta 1998, NAFOn yleissopimuksen XI artiklan mukaisesti ehdotuk- sesta tuli 25 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)st(cid:132) marraskuuta 1997 NAFOn sopimus- puolia velvoittava toimenpide, kun ehdotusta ei vastus- tettu, 1 artikla Korvataan asetuksen (EY) N:o 3070/95 1 artiklan 1 kohdassa p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132) ”31 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)(cid:132)n joulukuuta 1997” p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)- m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)ll(cid:132) ”31 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)(cid:132)n joulukuuta 1998”. 2 artikla T(cid:132)m(cid:132) asetus tulee voimaan p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132), Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)jen virallisessa lehdess(cid:132). jona se julkaistaan Sit(cid:132) sovelletaan 1 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)st(cid:132) tammikuuta 1998. T(cid:132)m(cid:132) asetus on kaikilta osiltaan velvoittava, j(cid:132)senvaltioissa. ja sit(cid:132) sovelletaan sellaisenaan kaikissa Tehty Brysseliss(cid:132) 30 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) maaliskuuta 1998. Neuvoston puolesta LORD SIMON of HIGHBURY Puheenjohtaja (1) EYVL C 6, 10. 1. 1998, s. 17 (2) Lausunto, annettu 13. maaliskuuta 1998 (ei viel(cid:132) julkaistu vi- rallisessa lehdess(cid:132)). (3) EYVL L 329, 30. 12. 1995, s. 11


title: 98/262/EY: Neuvoston päätös, tehty 30 päivänä maaliskuuta 1998, Slovakian tasavallan liittymistä valmistelevan kumppanuuden periaatteista, ensisijaisista tavoitteista, välitavoitteista ja edellytyksistä

eurovoc_concepts:
EU programme
Slovakia
accession to the European Union
cooperation policy

text: L 121/16 FI Euroopan yhteisöjen virallinen lehti 23. 4. 98 NEUVOSTON PÄÄTÖS, tehty 30 päivänä maaliskuuta 1998, Slovakian tasavallan liittymistä valmistelevan kumppanuuden periaatteista, ensisijaisista tavoitteista, välitavoitteista ja edellytyksistä (98/262/EY) EUROOPAN UNIONIN NEUVOSTO, joka ottaa huomioon Euroopan yhteisön perustamissopimuk- sen, ottaa huomioon Euroopan unionin jäsenyyttä hakeneille valtioille osana liittymistä edeltävää strategiaa annetta- vasta avusta ja erityisesti liittymiskumppanuusjärjestel- män perustamisesta 16 päivänä maaliskuuta 1998 anne- tun neuvoston asetuksen (EY) N:o 622/98 (1) ja erityisesti sen 2 artiklan, ottaa huomioon komission ehdotuksen, sekä katsoo, että Luxemburgissa kokoontunut Eurooppa-neuvosto totesi, että liittymistä valmisteleva kumppanuus on uusi väline ja vahvistetun liittymistä valmistelevan strategian tärkein osa, asetuksessa (EY) N:o 622/98 säädetään, että neuvosto päättää komission ehdotuksesta määräenemmistöllä kuta- kin liittymistä valmistelevaa kumppanuutta koskevista periaatteista, ensisijaisista tavoitteista, välitavoitteista ja edellytyksistä sellaisina kuin ne esitetään kullekin hakija- maalle sekä niitä koskevista myöhemmistä merkittävistä mukautuksista, yhteisön avun saamisen edellytyksenä on olennaisten edellytysten täyttäminen ja erityisesti Eurooppa-sopimuk- siin sisältyvien sitoumusten noudattaminen ja edistyminen Kööpenhaminan arviointiperusteiden täyttämisessä; jos olennainen edellytys jää täyttymättä, neuvosto voi komis- sion ehdotuksesta määräenemmistöllä toteuttaa asiaan- kuuluvia toimenpiteitä minkä tahansa liittymistä valmis- televan tuen osalta, Luxemburgissa kokoontunut Eurooppa-neuvosto on päättänyt, että liittymistä valmistelevan kumppanuuden toteuttamista ja edistymistä yhteisön säännöstön saatta- misessa osaksi kansallista lainsäädäntöä tarkastellaan Eurooppa-sopimuksen mukaisissa elimissä, (1) EYVL L 85, 20. 3. 1998, s. 1. komission lausunnossa esitettiin puolueeton arviointi Slo- vakian tasavallan jäsenyysvalmisteluista ja yksilöitiin ensi- sijaisia alueita valmistelujen jatkamista varten, ja jäsenyyden valmistelemiseksi Slovakian tasavallan olisi laadittava kansallinen ohjelma yhteisön säännöstön saat- tamiseksi osaksi kansallista lainsäädäntöä; tässä ohjel- massa olisi esitettävä aikataulu liittymistä valmistelevaan kumppanuuteen sisältyville ensisijaisille tavoitteille ja väli- tavoitteiden saavuttamiselle, ON PÄÄTTÄNYT SEURAAVAA: 1 artikla Tämän päätöksen liitteessä, joka on erottamaton osa päätöstä, esitetyt periaatteet, ensisijaiset tavoitteet, välita- voitteet ja edellytykset sisältyvät Slovakian tasavallan liittymistä valmistelevaan kumppanuuteen asetuksen (EY) N:o 622/98 2 artiklan mukaisesti. 2 artikla Liittymistä valmistelevan kumppanuuden toteuttamista valvotaan Eurooppa-sopimuksen mukaisissa elimissä sekä asianomaisissa neuvoston elimissä, joille komissio rapor- toi säännöllisesti. 3 artikla Tämä päätös tulee voimaan kolmantena päivänä sen jälkeen, kun se on julkaistu Euroopan yhteisöjen viralli- sessa lehdessä. Tehty Brysselissä 30 päivänä maaliskuuta 1998. Neuvoston puolesta M. BECKETT Puheenjohtaja 23. 4. 98 FI Euroopan yhteisöjen virallinen lehti L 121/17 LIITE Slovakia 1. Tavoitteet Liittymistä valmistelevan kumppanuuden tarkoituksena on luoda yhteinen kehys niille lisätoimia edellyttä- ville ensisijaisille tavoitteille, jotka mainitaan komission lausunnossa Slovakian hakemuksesta Euroopan unionin jäseneksi, näiden ensisijaisten tavoitteiden toteuttamisen avustamiseksi Slovakialle myönnettävissä oleville rahavaroille sekä kyseiseen apuun liittyville edellytyksille. Liittymistä valmisteleva kumppanuus tarjoaa kehyksen useille politiikan välineille, joita käytetään jäsenyyttä hakeneiden maiden auttamiseksi niiden valmistautuessa jäsenyyteen. Näihin välineisiin kuuluvat muun muassa yhteisön säännöstön hyväksy- mistä koskeva kansallinen ohjelma, joka Slovakian on määrä hyväksyä, sekä talouspolitiikan ensisijaisten tavoitteiden yhteinen arviointi, sopimus järjestäytynyttä rikollisuutta vastaan sekä sisämarkkinaohjeistus. Kukin näistä välineistä on luonteeltaan erilainen, ja niitä valmistellaan ja ne toteutetaan erityistä menettelyä noudattaen. Ne eivät ole olennainen osa tätä kumppanuutta, mutta niiden ensisijaiset tavoitteet ovat kumppanuuden mukaisia. 2. Periaatteet Kunkin hakijamaan osalta määritetyt keskeisimmät ensisijaiset tavoitteet liittyvät maiden kykyyn täyttää Kööpenhaminassa vahvistetut edellytykset, joiden mukaan jäsenyys edellyttää, että: — hakijamaassa on vakaat instituutiot, jotka takaavat demokratian, oikeusvaltion, ihmisoikeudet sekä vähemmistöjen kunnioittamisen ja suojelemisen; — hakijamaassa on toimiva markkinatalous, ja se pystyy selviytymään kilpailun paineista ja markkinavoi- mista unionissa; — hakijamaa pystyy vastaamaan jäsenyyden mukanaan tuomista velvoitteista, mukaan lukien poliittisen unionin sekä talous- ja rahaliiton tavoitteiden noudattaminen. Madridissa kokoontunut Eurooppa-neuvosto korosti hakijamaiden tarvetta mukauttaa hallintorakenteensa yhteisön politiikkojen moitteettoman toiminnan varmistamiseksi liittymisen jälkeen, ja Luxemburgissa kokoontunut Eurooppa-neuvosto korosti, että yhteisön säännöstön saattaminen osaksi kansallista lainsää- däntöä on välttämätöntä, mutta yksinään riittämätöntä; on tarpeen varmistaa, että sitä todella sovelle- taan. 3. Ensisijaiset tavoitteet ja välitavoitteet Komission lausunnoissa ja niitä koskevassa neuvoston tarkastelussa on tuotu esiin sellaisten toimien laajuus, jotka hakijamaiden on vielä toteutettava tietyillä aloilla valmistautuakseen unioniin liittymiseen ja katsottu, että mikään näistä maista ei täytä tällä hetkellä kokonaan kaikkia Kööpenhaminassa vahvistettuja edellytyksiä. Tämä tilanne edellyttää välitavoitteiden määrittelemistä ensisijaisille tavoitteille, ja niihin kuhunkin on liityttävä asianomaisten maiden kanssa yhdessä asetetut selkeät tavoitteet, joiden saavuttami- sesta riippuu hakijamaille myönnettävän avun määrä sekä jo joidenkin maiden kanssa käynnissä olevissa neuvotteluissa edistyminen ja muiden hakijamaiden kanssa käytävien neuvottelujen käynnistäminen. Ensisi- jaiset tavoitteet ja välitavoitteet on jaettu kahteen ryhmään eli lyhyen ja keskipitkän aikavälin tavoitteisiin. Lyhyen aikavälin tavoitteiden valinnassa on perusteena käytetty Slovakian realistisia mahdollisuuksia toteuttaa tavoitteet tai edistyä niiden toteuttamisessa pitkälle vuoden 1998 loppuun mennessä. Koska aika on lyhyt ja ottaen huomioon ensisijaisten tavoitteiden saavuttamiseksi tarvittava hallinnollinen toimintaval- mius, lyhyen aikavälin ensisijaisten tavoitteiden lukumäärä on pieni. Keskipitkän aikavälin ensisijaisiksi tavoitteiksi määriteltyjen tavoitteiden toteuttamisen oletetaan vievän yli vuoden, vaikkakin toteuttaminen voi ja sen olisi alettava jo vuoden 1998 aikana. Slovakiaa pyydetään laatimaan maaliskuun loppuun mennessä yhteisön säännöstön hyväksymistä koskeva kansallinen ohjelma, jossa olisi vahvistettava aikataulu näiden ensisijaisten tavoitteiden ja välitavoitteiden toteuttamiseksi sekä mainittava mahdollisuuksien ja tarpeen mukaan tarvittavien henkilöstön ja rahavarojen määrä. Liittymistä valmisteleva kumppanuus merkitsee sitä, että Slovakian on huolehdittava kaikista lausunnossa mainituista asioista. Yhteisön säännöstön saattaminen osaksi kansallista lainsäädäntöä ei yksinään riitä, vaan on myös tarpeen varmistaa, että sitä todella sovelletaan unionissa voimassa olevien perusteiden mukaisesti. Kaikilla jäljempänä mainituilla aloilla tarvitaan yhteisön säännöstön uskottavaa ja tehokasta voimaan saattamista ja täytäntöönpanoa. L 121/18 FI Euroopan yhteisöjen virallinen lehti 23. 4. 98 Komission lausunnon ja sitä koskevan neuvoston tarkastelun perusteella Slovakialle on määritetty jäljem- pänä esitetyt lyhyen ja keskipitkän aikavälin ensisijaiset tavoitteet sekä välitavoitteet. 3. 1 L y h y e n a i k a v ä l i n t a v o i t t e e t ( 1 9 9 8 ) Poliittiset edellytykset: vapaat ja vilpittömät presidentinvaalit sekä kansalliset ja paikalliset vaalit vuonna 1998; opposition tosiasiallisen osallistumisen varmistaminen parlamentaaristen valvontakomiteoiden ja valvontalautakuntien työskentelyyn; vähemmistökielten käyttöä koskevien lakien ja täytäntöönpanotoimen- piteiden antaminen. Talouden uudistaminen: keskipitkän aikavälin talouspolitiikan ensisijaisten tavoitteiden vahvistaminen ja yhteinen arviointi Eurooppa-sopimuksen yhteydessä; sisäisen ja ulkoisen epätasapainon ratkaisemiseen pyrkivien politiikkojen täytäntöönpano sekä makrotalouden tasapainon ylläpito; edistyminen rakenteiden uudistamisessa ja yritysten, rahoitus- ja pankkialan sekä energiavaltaisen raskaan teollisuuden yksityistämi- sessä ja rakennemuutoksessa. Institutionaalisten ja hallinnollisten valmiuksien parantaminen: mukaan lukien virkamieslainsäädännön hyväksyminen ja sellaisen julkishallinnon uudistamisstrategian kehittäminen, jossa painotetaan unioniin liittymistä koskevia asioita käsittelevän hallinnon lujittamista; toimielinten lujittaminen ympäristöalalla; eläinlääkinnästä ja kasviensuojelusta vastaavien hallintojen vahvistaminen erityisesti ulkorajoilla olevilla toimipaikoilla; alue- ja rakennepolitiikan edellyttämien rakenteiden luomisen aloittaminen. Sisämarkkinat: mukaan lukien lainsäädännön yhdenmukaistaminen standardoinnin ja varmentamisen aloilla; valtionapu (edistyminen lainsäädännön antamiseksi); henkinen omaisuus (lainsäädännön yhdenmukaistami- nen); julkiset hankinnat (mukaan lukien avoimuus), konkurssimenettelyt; maatalous (eläinlääkintä-, ja kasviensuojelualat); standardointi- ja vaatimustenmukaisuuden arviointilaitosten perustaminen. Ympäristö: puitelainsäädännön saattamisen osaksi kansallista lainsäädäntöä jatkaminen, yksityiskohtaisten lähentämisohjelmien ja yksittäisiin toimiin liittyvien täytäntöönpanostrategioiden laatiminen ja täytäntöön- pano; näiden ohjelmien ja strategioiden suunnittelu ja täytäntöönpanon aloittaminen. 3. 2 K e s k i p i t k ä n a i k a v ä l i n t a v o i t t e e t Poliittiset edellytykset: lisäpyrkimykset perustuslain noudattamisen ja opposition oikeuksien varmistami- seksi; tuomioistuinten riippumattomuuden varmistaminen; demokraattisten instituutioiden toiminnan edistä- minen ja lujittaminen; valtiosta riippumattomat järjestöt; riippumattomat tiedotusvälineet (erityisesti radio ja televisio); vähemmistöjen oikeuksia suojaavat politiikat ja instituutiot. Talouspolitiikka: talouspolitiikan ensisijaisten tavoitteiden yhteisen arvioinnin säännöllinen tarkastelu Eurooppa-sopimuksen yhteydessä, minkä tavoitteena on Kööpenhaminassa vahvistettujen, unionin jäse- nyyttä koskevien edellytysten täyttäminen ja yhteisön säännöstön käyttöönotto talous- ja rahapolitiikan alalla (talouspolitiikan yhteensovittaminen, lähentymisohjelmien laatiminen, liiallisten alijäämien välttämi- nen); vaikka Slovakian ei oleteta ottavan käyttöön euroa heti unioniin liityttyään, odotetaan sen harjoitta- van politiikkaa, jonka tavoitteena on tosiasiallinen lähentyminen unionin taloudellista ja sosiaalista yhteenkuuluvuutta koskevien tavoitteiden mukaisesti sekä nimellinen lähentyminen, joka mahdollistaa lopullisena tavoitteena euron käyttöönoton. Institutionaalisten ja hallinnollisten valmiuksien parantaminen: valtion tilintarkastusvirasto; varainhoidon valvonta ja sisäinen tarkastustoiminta; tulli; pankkien ja rahoitusmarkkinoiden valvontaelimet; alueellinen kehittäminen; institutionaaliset rakenteet ja talousarviojärjestelmät; tuomioistuinjärjestelmän toiminnan parantaminen ja yhteisön lainsäädäntöä ja sen soveltamista koskevan koulutuksen järjestäminen tuomiois- tuimille; oikeus- ja sisäasioiden instituutioiden lujittaminen (riittävän ja tarpeeksi koulutetun henkilöstön varmistaminen erityisesti poliisivoimissa, rajavartiostossa, ministeriöissä ja tuomioistuimissa); ydinturvavi- ranomaisen lujittaminen; tulli- ja verohallintojen uudistaminen yhteisön säännöstön soveltamisvalmiuden varmistamiseksi sekä elintarvikevalvonnan hallinnon lujittaminen. Sisämarkkinat: mukaan lukien lainsäädännön yhdenmukaistaminen kilpailun (trustien vastainen toiminta, valtionavun valvonta ja avoimuus), välillisen verotuksen, henkisen omaisuuden (voimaan saattaminen), rahoituspalvelujen ja tietosuojan aloilla sekä audiovisuaalisella alalla; standardointi- ja vaatimustenmukai- suuden arviointilaitosten lujittaminen, markkinoiden valvontajärjestelmän perustaminen; teollisuustuotteiden teknisen lainsäädännön yhdenmukaistaminen; yritysten kehittämisen edistäminen, mukaan lukien pienet ja keskisuuret yritykset; yhdenmukaistaminen yhteisön säännöstöön nähden televiestinnän, kuluttajansuojan ja sisäisten energiamarkkinoiden aloilla. 23. 4. 98 FI Euroopan yhteisöjen virallinen lehti L 121/19 Oikeus- ja sisäasiat: oikeus- ja sisäasioiden instituutioiden lujittaminen ja kehittäminen edelleen (erityisesti poliisivoimien vastuun ja tuomioistuinten riippumattomuuden varmistamiseksi); tehokkaan rajavalvonnan kehittäminen edelleen; järjestäytyneen rikollisuuden (erityisesti rahanpesu, huumeet ja ihmiskauppa) ja korruption torjunta; viisumikäytännön yhdenmukaistaminen unionin käytännön mukaiseksi; yhdenmukais- tamisen päätökseen saattaminen kansainvälisiin yleissopimuksiin nähden; turvapaikka- ja muuttoliikekysy- mysten käsittelyvalmiuden parantaminen ottaen erityisesti huomioon Schengenin sopimusten määräykset. Maatalous: mukaan lukien yhdenmukaistaminen yhteisön maataloussäännöstöön nähden (mukaan lukien eläinlääkintää ja kasviensuojelua koskevat seikat ja erityisesti ulkorajoilla suoritettavat tarkastukset); huomion kiinnittäminen maatalouden ympäristöasioihin ja biologiseen monimuotoisuuteen; yhteisen maata- louspolitiikan täytäntöönpanovalmiuden kehittäminen erityisesti hallinnon perusjärjestelmien ja hallintora- kenteiden osalta maatalouden markkinoiden valvomiseksi sekä rakennetoimenpiteiden ja maaseudun kehit- tämistoimenpiteiden täytäntöönpanemiseksi; eläinlääkintää ja kasviensuojelua koskevien vaatimusten käyt- töönotto ja täytäntöönpano; tiettyjen elintarvikkeiden jalostuslaitosten sekä testaus- ja analysointilaitosten toiminnan parantaminen; maatalouselintarvikealan rakenneuudistus. Energia: sellaisen tehokkuuteen ja monipuolisuuteen perustuvan laaja-alaisen pitkän aikavälin energiastrate- gian täytäntöönpano, jossa otetaan huomioon yhdenmukaisuus yhteisön energialainsäädäntöön nähden ja kyseisen lainsäädännön täytäntöönpano; Mochovcen ydinvoimalan rakentaminen kansainvälisesti hyväksyt- tyjen turvallisuusperiaatteiden mukaisesti; Bohunicen voimalan sulkemista koskevan realistisen ohjelman täytäntöönpano. Liikenne: lisäpyrkimykset yhdenmukaistamisessa yhteisön säännöstöön nähden erityisesti maantiekuljetusten (markkinoille pääsy, turvallisuussäännöt ja verotus) ja rautatiekuljetusten aloilla sekä tarpeelliset, liikenteen infrastruktuuriin suuntautuvat investoinnit erityisesti Euroopan laajuisten verkkojen laajentamiseksi. Työllisyys ja sosiaalikysymykset: sopivien työmarkkinarakenteiden kehittäminen ja työllisyyspolitiikan yhteinen tarkastelu valmistautumiseksi osallistumaan unionin yhteensovittamiseen; työvoima-, työterveys- ja työturvallisuuslainsäädännön yhteensovittaminen sekä täytäntöönpanojärjestelmien kehittäminen; erityisesti työterveyttä ja -turvallisuutta koskevan kehysdirektiivin säännösten hyväksyminen varhaisessa vaiheessa; aktiivisen ja itsenäisen sosiaalisen vuoropuhelun kehittäminen edelleen; sosiaaliturvan kehittäminen edelleen; naisten ja miesten yhtäläisten mahdollisuuksien voimaan saattaminen; sitoutuminen saattamaan kansanter- veyden vaatimukset unionin vaatimusten mukaisiksi. Ympäristö: valvonta- ja täytäntöönpanorakenteiden sekä -valmiuksien kehittäminen; yksittäisiä säädöksiä koskevien lähentämisohjelmien jatkuva suunnittelu ja täytäntöönpano; erityisesti olisi kiinnitettävä huomi- ota ilma-, vesi- ja jätehuoltoaloihin sekä yhdenmukaiseen teollisuuden saasteiden valvontaan ja riskienhallin- taan; ympäristönsuojeluvaatimukset ja kestävän kehityksen tarve on otettava huomioon kansallisia alakoh- taisia politiikkoja laadittaessa ja täytäntöönpantaessa. Aluepolitiikka ja yhteenkuuluvuus: oikeudellisen, hallinnollisen ja talousarviota koskevan kehyksen käyt- töönotto sellaista yhdenmukaista aluepolitiikkaa varten, jonka ansiosta Slovakia voi osallistua unionin rakenneohjelmiin siihen liityttyään. 4. Ohjelmointi Vuosille 1995-1997 myönnetyt Phare-ohjelman määrärahat olivat yhteensä 95 miljoonaa ecua. Edellyttäen, että Phare-ohjelman talousarvio hyväksytään jäljellä olevan ajanjakson osalta, komissio vahvistaa määrära- hat vuosille 1998 ja 1999. Slovakiaa voidaan lisäksi tukea vuodelle 1998 suunnitellun ns. catch-up -välineen avulla. Rahoitusehdotukset esitetään Phare-ohjelman hallintokomitealle asetuksen (ETY) N:o 3906/89 mukaisesti. Hakijamaiden osallistumista yhteisrahoitukseen edellytetään järjestelmällisesti kaikissa investoin- tihankkeissa. Vuodesta 2000 alkaen annettava rahoitusapu sisältää maataloudelle annettavan avun ja rakennevälineen, joilla asetetaan koheesiorahastoa vastaavat toimenpiteet etusijalle. 5. Ehdollisuus Yhteisön avun edellytyksenä on, että Slovakia noudattaa Eurooppa-sopimuksen mukaisia sitoumuksiaan, jatkaa toimia Kööpenhaminassa vahvistettujen edellytysten täyttämiseksi ja edistyy tämän liittymistä valmistelevan kumppanuuden täytäntöönpanossa. Näiden yleisten edellytysten noudattamatta jättäminen saattaa johtaa neuvoston päätöksen antamiseen rahoitusavun keskeyttämisestä asetuksen (EY) N:o 622/98 4 artiklan nojalla. L 121/20 FI Euroopan yhteisöjen virallinen lehti 23. 4. 98 6. Valvonta Liittymistä valmistelevan kumppanuuden täytäntöönpanoa valvotaan Eurooppa-sopimuksen yhteydessä. Valvominen aloitetaan vuonna 1998, ennen kuin komissio antaa neuvostolle ensimmäisen säännöllisin väliajoin annettavan kertomuksensa, jossa arvioidaan Slovakian edistymistä, mukaan lukien liittymistä valmistelevan kumppanuuden täytäntöönpano. Liittymistä valmistelevan kumppanuuden asianomaisia osa-alueita käsitellään osa-alueesta vastaavassa alakomiteassa. Assosiaatiokomitea käsittelee ensisijaisiin tavoitteisiin ja välivaiheen tavoitteisiin liittyvää yleistä kehitystä, edistymistä ja ongelmia sekä alakomiteoiden sille käsiteltäviksi toimittamia erityisiä kysymyksiä. Assosiaatiokomitea raportoi assossiaationeuvostolle liittymistä valmistelevan kumppanuuden täytäntöönpanosta. Phare-ohjelman hallintokomitea varmistaa, että rahoituspäätökset ovat liittymistä valmistelevan kumppa- nuuden mukaisia. Liittymistä valmistelevaa kumppanuutta muutetaan tarvittaessa asetuksen (EY) N:o 622/98 2 artiklan mukaisesti. Komissio ehdottaa, että tätä kumppanuutta tarkastellaan ennen vuoden 1999 loppua ja säännöllisin väliajoin sen jälkeen, mistä neuvosto tekee muodollisen päätöksen. Näissä tarkasteluissa arvioidaan tarvetta tarkentaa välitavoitteita sen perusteella, kuinka Slovakia on edistynyt tämän kumppa- nuuden mukaisesti asetettujen tavoitteiden saavuttamisessa