title: Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters concerning the provisional application of the Protocol establishing the fishing possibilities and the financial compensation provided for in the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of the Republic of Guinea on fishing off the Guinean coast for the period 1 January 1998 to 31 December 1999

eurovoc_concepts:
Guinea
deep-sea fishing
financial compensation of an agreement
fishing agreement
fishing licence
inshore fishing

text: COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 09. 03. 1998 COM(1998) 129 final 98/0086 (CNS) Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters concerning the provisional application of the Protocol establishing the fishing possibilities and the financial compensation provided for in the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of the Republic of Guinea on fishing off the Guinean coast for the period 1 January 1998 to 31 December 1999 Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) approving the Protocol establishing the fishing possibilities and the financial compensation provided for in the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of the Republic of Guinea on fishing off the Guinean coast for the period 1 January 1998 to 31 December 1999 (presented by the Commission) EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM The Protocol annexed to the fisheries agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea expired on 31 December 1997. A new Protocol was initialled by the two parties on 11 December 1997 establishing the technical and financial conditions under which Community fishing vessels can fish in Guinea waters in the period 1 January 1998 to 31 December 1999. The Commission is accordingly proposing that the Council should adopt: by means of a Decision, the draft Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters concerning the provisional application of the new Protocol pending its final entry into force, by means of a Regulation, the Protocol establishing the fishing opportunities and the associated technical and financial conditions agreed between the Community and Guinea-Bissau for the period 1 January 1998 to 31 January 1999. « PROPOSAL FOR A COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters concerning the provisional application of the Protocol establishing the fishing possibilities and the financial compensation provided for in the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of the Republic of Guinea on fishing off the Guinean coast for the period 1 January 1998 to 31 December 1999 THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of the Republic of Guinea on fishing off the Guinean coast1, and in particular Article 15 thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, Whereas, in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 15 of the aforesaid Agreement, the Community and the Republic of Guinea have conducted negotiations to determine any amendments and additions to be made to the Agreement at the end of the period of application of the Protocol annexed thereto; Whereas, as a result of those negotiations, a new Protocol was initialled on 11 December 1997; Whereas, under that Protocol, Community fishermen enjoy fishing possibilities in the waters under the sovereignty or jurisdiction of the Republic of Guinea for the period 1 January 1998 to 31 December 1999; Whereas, in order to avoid any interruption in the fishing activities of Community vessels, it is essential that the new Protocol be applied as soon as possible; whereas the two parties have accordingly initialled an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of 1 OJL 111, 27. 4. 1983, p. 1. 2 Letters providing for the initialled Protocol to apply provisionally from the day following that on which the Protocol currently in force expires; Whereas the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters should be approved, pending a final decision taken under Article 43 of the Treaty, Whereas the fishing possibilities should be apportioned among the Member States on the basis of the traditional allocation of fishing possibilities under the fisheries Agreement, HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS: Article 1 The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters concerning the provisional application of the Protocol establishing the fishing possibilities and the financial compensation provided for in the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of the Republic of Guinea on fishing off the Guinean coast for the period 1 January 1998 to 31 December 1999 is hereby approved on behalf of the Community. The texts of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters and of the Protocol are attached to this Decision. Article 2 The fishing possibilities laid down in the Protocol shall be allocated among the Member States as follows: a) cephalopods/fin-fish: Spain: 1 350 grt Italy: 1 200 grt Greece: 1 450 grt b) shrimps: Spain: 700 grt U Portugal: 200 grt Greece: 100 grt c) tuna seiners: France: 19 vessels Spain: 14 vessels d) pole-and-line tuna vessels: France: 8 vessels Spain: 5 vessels e) surface longliners: France: 3 vessels Spain: 23 vessels Portugal: 2 vessels. If licence applications from those Member States do not exhaust the fishing possibilities established in the Protocol, the Commission may consider licence applications from any other Member State. Article 3 The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the persons empowered to sign the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters in order to bind the Community. Done at For the Council The President x AGREEMENT IN THE FORM OF AN EXCHANGE OF LETTERS CONCERNING THE PROVISIONAL APPLICATION OF THE PROTOCOL ESTABLISHING THE FISHING POSSIBILITIES AND THE FINANCIAL COMPENSATION PROVIDED FOR IN THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF GUINEA ON FISHING OFF THE GUINEAN COAST FOR THE PERIOD 1 JANUARY 1998 TO 31 DECEMBER 1999 A. Letter from the Government of the Republic of Guinea Sir, the financial compensation With reference to the Protocol, initialled on 11 December 1997, establishing the fishing possibilities and to 31 December 1999,1 have the honour to inform you that the Government of the Republic of Guinea is ready to apply that Protocol on a provisional basis from 1 January 1998, pending the entry into force of the Protocol in accordance with Article 7 thereof, provided that the European Community is prepared to do the same. the period 1 January 1998 for This is on the understanding that the first instalment of the financial consideration specified in Article 2 of the Protocol is paid by 30 June 1998. I should be obliged if you would confirm the European Community's agreement to such provisional application. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. For the Government of the Republic of Guinea —7- / B. Letter from the Community Sir, I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of today's date, which reads as follows: financial compensation 'With reference to the Protocol, initialled on 11 December 1997, establishing the fishing possibilities and the to 31 December 1999,1 have the honour to inform you that the Government of the Republic of Guinea is ready to apply that Protocol on a provisional basis from 1 January 1998, pending the entry into force of the Protocol in accordance with Article 7 therçofuprovided ^r^J that the European Community is prepared to do the same. for the period 1 January 1998 This is on the understanding that the first instalment of the financial consideration specified in Article 2 of the Protocol is paid by 30 June 1998. I should be obliged if you would confirm the European Community's agreement to such provisional application. " I have the honour to confirm the European Community's agreement to such provisional application. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. On behalf of the Council the European Union PROPOSAL FOR A COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) 9 IS J o o - gt ( CAjj x approving the Protocol establishing the fishing possibilities and the financial compensation provided for in the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of the Republic of Guinea on fishing off the Guinean coast for the period 1 January 1998 to 31 December 1999 THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 43, in conjunction with the first sentence of Article 228(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 228(3) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament*'), Whereas, pursuant to the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of the Republic of Guinea on fishing off the Guinean coast<2> , the two Parties have conducted negotiations to determine any amendments and additions to be made to the Agreement at the end of the period of application of the Protocol annexed thereto; Whereas, as a result of those negotiations, a new Protocol establishing the fishing possibilities and the financial compensation provided for in the abovementioned Agreement for the period 1 January 1998 to 31 December 1999 was initialled on 11 December 1997; Whereas it is in the Community's interest to approve the new Protocol, Whereas the fishing possibilities should be apportioned among the Member States on the basis of the traditional allocation of fishing possibilities under the fisheries Agreement, 0) OJ <2> OJL 111,27. 4. 1983, p. 1. HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 The Protocol establishing the fishing possibilities and the financial compensation provided for in the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of the Republic of Guinea on fishing off the Guinean coast for the period 1 January 1998 to 31 December 1999 is hereby approved on behalf of the Community. The text of the Protocol is attached to this Regulation. Article 2 The fishing possibilities laid down in the Protocol shall be allocated among the Member States as follows: a) cephalopods/fm-fish: Spain: 1350 grt Italy: 1200 grt Greece: 1450 grt b) shrimps: Spain: 700 grt (c) tuna seiners: Portugal: 200 grt Greece: 100 grt France: 19 vessels Spain: 14 vessels d) pole-and-line tuna vessels: France: e) surface longliners: Spain: France: Spain: 8 vessels 5 vessels 3 vessels 23 vessels Portugal: 2 vessels. 9 If licence applications from those Member States do not exhaust the fishing possibilities established in the Protocol, the Commission may consider licence applications from any other Member State. Article 3 The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the persons empowered to sign the Protocol in order to bind the Community. Article 4 This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at For the Council The President ^o PROTOCOL establishing the fishing possibilities and the financial compensation provided for in the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of the Republic of Guinea on fishing off the Guinean coast for the period 1 January 1998 to 31 December 1999 Article 1 For a period of two years from 1 January 1998, the fishing possibilities granted under Article 2 of the Agreement shall be as follows: 1 ) a) fin-fish and cephalopod trawlers: 4 000 gross registered tonnes (grt) per year; 2) b) shrimp trawlers: 1 000 gross registered tonnes (grt) per year; 3) freezer tuna seiners: 33 vessels; 4) pole-and-line tuna vessels: 13 vessels; 5) surface longliners: 28 vessels. Where appropriate and where the state of resources so permits, the Joint Committee provided for in Article 10 of the Agreement shall consider including new categories of fish and shall lay down the technical and financial conditions under which they can be fished by Community vessels. Article 2 1. 2. 3. The financial compensation referred to in Article 8 of the Agreement shall amount to ECU 2 800 000 for the first year (of which ECU 1 400 000 by way of a financial consideration and ECU 1 400 000 for the measures listed in Article 4 of the current Protocol) and ECU 3 700 000 for the second year (of which ECU 1 850 000 by way of a financial consideration and ECU 1 850 000 for the measures listed in Article 4 of the current Protocol) for the fishing possibilities listed in Article 1. That financial consideration shall be payable by 30 June each year at the latest. The use to which the financial consideration is put shall be the sole responsibility of the Government of the Republic of Guinea. The financial consideration shall be paid into an account specified by the Government of the Republic of Guinea and opened with the Public Treasury. Article 3 At the request of the Community, the fishing possibilities established in Article 1(1) may be increased by successive instalments of 1 000 grt a year. In that case, the financial Ai consideration referred to in Article 2 shall be increased proportionately, pro rata temporis. Article 4 Of the overall financial compensation established in Article 2(1), the following measures shall be financed to the amount of ECU 1 400 000 in the first year and ECU 1 850 000 in the second year, according to the following breakdown: 1. scientific and technical programmes to improve knowledge of fishery and biological resources within Guinea's fishing zone: ECU 450 000; 2. support for fishery surveillance bodies: ECU 800 000; 3. support for artisanal fishing: ECU 320 000; 4. institutional support for the Ministry of Fisheries: ECU 800 000; 5. awards for study, practical training and seminars in the various scientific, technical and economic disciplines relating to fisheries: ECU 390 000; 6. Guinea's contribution to international fisheries organisations: ECU 100 000; 7. costs of Guinean delegates' participation in international meetings on fisheries: ECU 390 000. The measures and the annual amounts allocated thereto shall be decided on by the Ministry of Fisheries, which shall inform the Commission thereof. The annual amounts shall be made available to the bodies concerned by 30 June each year at the latest. The Government of the Republic of Guinea shall provide the bank account numbers to be used for such payments. The Ministry of Fisheries shall forward an annual report to the Delegation of the European Commission on the implementation of the measures and the results obtained. The Commission reserves the right to ask the Ministry of Fisheries for any additional information on the results and to reconsider the payments concerned should the measures not be implemented. Article 5 Should the Community fail to make the payments provided for in Articles 2 and 4, the application of this Protocol may be suspended. Article 6 The Annex to the Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Guinea and the European Community on fishing off the Guinean coast is repealed and replaced by the Annex hereto. 43, Article 7 This Protocol shall enter into force on the date on which it is signed. It shall apply from 1 January 1998. 4S ANNEX Conditions governing fishing by Community vessels in Guinea's fishing zone A. Licence application and issuing formalities At least 30 days before the date on which the requested term of validity commences, the competent Community authorities are to present an application for each vessel that is to be used for fishing under the Agreement to the Ministry of Fisheries via the Delegation of the European Commission in Guinea. The applications are to be made out using the forms provided for that purpose by the Ministry of Fisheries, a specimen of which is attached hereto (Appendix 1). Licence applications are to be accompanied by proof of payment of the fee covering the licence's term of validity. Payment is to be made into an account opened with the Public Treasury of Guinea. The fees include all national and local taxes, with the exception of port fees and charges for the provision of services. Within 30 days of receipt of proof of payment as referred to above, the licences for all vessels will be issued by the Ministry of Fisheries to the shipowners or their representatives via the Delegation of the European Commission in Guinea. The following annual periods serve to determine the term of validity of licences: first period: 1 January to 31 December 1998 second period: 1 January to 31 December 1999. Licences cannot commence running during one annual period and expire during the following annual period. Licences are issued for specific vessels and are not transferable. However, at the request of the Community and where force majeure is proven, a vessel's licence will be replaced by a new licence for another vessel whose features are similar to those of the first vessel. The owner of the vessel to be replaced is to return the cancelled licence to the Ministry of Fisheries via the Delegation of the European Commission in Guinea. The new licence must state: - the date of issue, 4V - the term of validity of the new licence, covering the period from the date of arrival of the replacement vessel to the date of expiry of the licence of the replaced vessel. In the event of replacement, no fee as referred to in Article 5(2) of the Agreement is due for the unexpired period of validity. Licences must be held on board at all times. I. Provisions applicable to trawlers 1. Vessels must put into the port of Conakry once a year before licences are issued so that the regulation inspection can be carried out. This inspection is to be carried out by duly authorised persons only and must take place within 24 working hours of the vessel's arrival in port, providing notice of arrival has been given at least 48 working hours in advance. Where licences are renewed within the calendar year, the vessels need not undergo a second inspection. The costs of technical inspections are to be borne by the shipowners and cannot exceed ECU 250 per vessel per year. 2. Each vessel must be represented by an agent of Guinean nationality established in Guinea. 3. a) Licences arc issued for three, six or twelve months and are renewable. The term of validity of licences must be taken into account when calculating the utilisation of the fishing possibilities granted under Article 1 of the Protocol. b) The fees to be paid by shipowners, expressed in ecus per gross registered tonne, are as follows: - for annual licences: first year second year fin-fish trawlers: cephalopod trawlers: shrimp trawlers: 126 150 152 132 158 160 45 - for six-month licences: first year second year fin-fish trawlers: cephalopod trawlers: shrimp trawlers: 65 77 78 68 81 82 - for three-month licences: first year second year fin-fish trawlers: cephalopod trawlers: shrimp trawlers: 33 39 40 35 41 42 However, an additional fee of ECU 30 per grt per year is payable by vessels failing to land 200 kg offish per grt per year in accordance with Part C. II. Provisions applicable to tuna vessels and surface longliners Licences must be kept on board at all times; however, fishing is authorised on receipt of the notification of payment of the advance forwarded by the Commission to the Guinean Ministry of Fisheries. Furthermore, pending receipt of the original of the licence, a copy of the licence drawn up can be sent by fax for keeping on board. Fees amount to ECU 20 per tonne per year caught within Guinea's fishing zone. Licences are to be issued following payment to the Ministry of Fisheries of a lump sum of ECU 1 800 per year for each tuna seiner, ECU 300 per year for each pole- and-line tuna vessel and ECU 500 per year for each surface longliner, covering the fees for: - 90 tonnes of tuna caught per year in the case of seiners, - 15 tonnes of tuna caught per year in the case of pole-and-line tuna vessels, - 25tonnes of tuna caught per year in the case of surface longliners. 4e The final statement of the fees clue for the fishing period is to be drawn up by the Commission at the end of each calendar year on the basis of the catch statements made for each vessel and confirmed by the scientific institutes responsible for verifying catch data, such as the Institut Français de Recherche Scientifique pour le Développement en Coopération (Orstom) and the Instituto Espanol de Oceanografia (IEO), in cooperation with the Centre National des Sciences Halieutiques de Boussoura (CNSHB). The statement is to be forwarded simultaneously to the Ministry of Fisheries and to the shipowners. No later than 30 days after the final statement is notified, any additional charges due are to be paid by the shipowners to the Ministry of Fisheries using the account opened with the Public Treasury of Guinea. However, if the final statement is lower than the abovementioned advance, the resulting balance will not be reimbursed. B. Statements of catch All Community vessels authorised under the Agreement to fish in Guinea's fishing zone are required to declare their catches to the Ministry of Fisheries, with a copy to the Delegation of the European Commission in Guinea, as follows: - - trawlers must declare their catches using the specimen statement attached hereto (Appendix 2). Statements of catch must be drawn up each month and presented at least once each quarter; tuna seiners, pole-and-line tuna vessels and surface longliners must keep fishing logs using the form in Appendix 3 for each fishing period spent in Guinea's fishing zone. Within 45 days of the end of the fishing period spent in Guinea's fishing zone, the forms must be sent to the Ministry of Fisheries via the Delegation of the European Commission in Guinea. Forms must be completed legibly and must be signed by the master of the vessel. Should this provision not be complied with, the Ministry of Fisheries reserves the right to suspend the licences of offending vessels until the formality has been completed. The Delegation of the European Commission in Guinea is to be notified of such cases. Where applicable, the Joint Committee provided for in Article 10 of the Agreement is to consider equipping Community fishing vessels with facilities for the electronic transmission of data covering fishing operations. //y c. UmlingofçMtçhçs As a contribution towards supplying the local population with fish caught in Guinea's fishing zone, trawlers authorised to fish in Guinea's fishing zone are required to land 200 kg of fish per grt per year free of charge. Landings may be made individually or collectively, mention being made of the vessels concerned. D. Bv-catches Crustaceans held on board fin-fish trawlers may not account for more than 9% nor cephalopods for more than 9% of their total catch in Guinea's fishing zone. Crustaceans held on board cephalopod trawlers may not account for more than 15% of their total catch in Guinea's fishing zone. Fish held on board shrimp trawlers may not account for more than 30% nor cephalopods for more than 20% of their total catch in Guinea's fishing zone. E. Signing-on of seamen Owners holding fishing licences issued under the Agreement are to contribute to the practical vocational training of Guinean nationals, subject to the conditions and limits set out below: 1) Each trawler owner must undertake to employ: - - two Guinean seamen on vessels of up to 200 grt, three Guinean seamen on vessels of more than 200 grt but not more than 350 grt, - four Guinean seamen on vessels of more than 350 grt. 2) For the fleet of tuna seiners, six Guinean seamen must be signed on permanently. 3) For the fleet of pole-and-line tuna vessels, five Guinean seamen must be signed on for the duration of the vessels' actual presence in Guinean waters, all of them to be assigned to different vessels. 4) For the fleet of surface longliners, the shipowners must undertake to employ two Guinean seamen per vessel for the duration of the vessels' actual presence in Guinean waters. 4? 5) The wages of these Guinean seamen are to be fixed before the licences are issued, by mutual agreement between the shipowners or their representatives and the Ministry of Fisheries; the wages arc to be paid by the shipowners and must include the seamen's social security contributions (including life, accident and health insurance). Should the seamen not be signed on, the owners of tuna seiners, pole-and-line tuna vessels and surface longliners are required to pay the Ministry of Fisheries a lump sum equivalent to the wages of the seamen not signed on in accordance with points 2, 3 and 4 above. That sum is to be used for the training of Guinean sea fishermen and must be paid into an account specified by the Ministry of Fisheries. F. Observers 1. The observer's task is to check on fishing activities in Guinea's fishing zone and to collect all statistical data on fishing operations by the vessel concerned. Observers must be granted every facility needed to carry out their duties, including access to premises and documents and must in particular be allowed to report fishing data by radio once a week. 2. All trawlers must take on board an observer appointed by the Ministry of Fisheries. Observers must not normally remain on board for more than two trips. 3. At the request of the Ministry of Fisheries, addressed to the European Commission, tuna vessels and surface longliners must take on board an observer, who must not remain on board any longer than is necessary to accomplish his duties. The masters of vessels must facilitate the work of the observers, who must be accorded the conditions enjoyed by the vessels' officers. The travelling costs of observers taken on board in foreign ports are to be borne by the shipowner. 4. The wages and social insurance contributions of observers are to be paid by the Ministry of Fisheries. In the case of trawlers, shipowners are to pay ECU 15 to the Centre National de Surveillance des Pêches (CNSP) for each day an observer spends on board as a contribution towards the expenses arising from the observer's presence on board. 4<f 5. Should a vessel with a Guinean observer on board leave Guinea's fishing zone, all steps must be taken for his return to Conakry as soon as possible at the expense of the shipowner. G. Inspection and monitoring Community vessels fishing in Guinea's fishing zone must permit and assist any Guinean officials responsible for inspection and monitoring to board the vessel and carry out their duties on board. The officials must not remain on board any longer than is necessary to verify catches by random checks and to conduct any other inspection relating to fishing activities. H. Fishing zones All the vessels referred to in Article 1 of the Protocol are authorised to fish in waters beyond 10 nautical miles. I. Meshes authorised The minimum mesh size authorised for the cod end (mesh stretched) is: a) 40 mm for shrimps; b) 70 mm for cephalopods; c) 70 mm for fin-fish; d) 16 mm for fishing for live bait. These mesh sizes also apply to trawls used for fishing with outriggers. J. Entering and leaving the zone Community vessels fishing under the Agreement in Guinea's fishing zone must report the date and time and their position each time they enter and leave Guinea's fishing zone to the radio station of the Centre National de Surveillance des Pêches (CNSP). The CNSP will inform the shipowners of the call sign and operating frequencies of the station at the time the licence is issued. Where they cannot communicate this information by radio, vessels may use alternative means, such as fax (CNSP: 1-212-4794-885; Ministry of Fisheries: 224-41 35 23). 40 /-• • - K. Boardiii)i of vessels 1. The Delegation of the European Commission in Guinea must be notified within 48 hours of any fishing vessel flying the flag of a Member State of the Community and operating under an Agreement between the Community and a third country that is boarded within Guinea's fishing zone and must at the same time be sent a summary report of the circumstances surrounding, and the reasons leading to, the boarding. 2. In the case of vessels authorised to fish in Guinean waters, before any measures are considered with regard to the vessel's master or crew or any action is contemplated with regard to its cargo and equipment other than to safeguard evidence relating to the alleged infringement, a conciliation meeting is to be held within 48 hours of receipt of the abovementioned information between the Delegation of the European Commission, the Ministry of Fisheries and the inspection authorities, possibly attended by a representative of the Member State concerned. At the meeting, the parties will exchange any relevant documentation and information, and in particular automatically recorded data showing the vessel's positions during the trip up to the time of boarding, that may help clarify the circumstances surrounding the facts. The shipowner or his representative is to be informed of the outcome of the meeting and of any measures resulting from the boarding. 3. Before any judicial proceedings are initiated, an attempt must be made to resolve the matter of the alleged infringement by compromise. Should no compromise be reached, that attempt is to be abandoned no later than three working days after the boarding. 4. Should no compromise be reached and the case consequently be brought before a competent judicial body, pending the judgment a bank security payable by the shipowner is to be set by the competent authorities within 48 hours of abandonment of the attempt to reach a compromise. The security must not exceed the maximum penalty laid down for such an infringement under national law. Where the master of the vessel concerned is not found guilty, the bank security is to be refunded to the shipowner by the competent authorities as soon as the case is settled. %4 5. The vessel and crew are to be released: - when the conciliation meeting is closed if the outcome so permits, - once the obligations arising from the compromise reached have been fulfilled, or - once the bank security is lodged (in connection with judicial proceedings). Q4 Appendix 1 APPLICATION FORM FORA FISHING LICENCE For official use only Remarks Nationality: Licence No: Date of signing: , Date of issue: 2 3 APPLICANT Name of firm: Trade register No: , First name and surname of applicant: Date am! place of birth: Occupation: Address: , No of employees: Name and address of co-signatory: VESSEL Type of vessel:. - Registration No: New name: Former name: , , Date and place of construction: Original nationality: Length. ' Beam: Hold:. Gross tonnage: Net tonnage: Type of building materials: Make of main engine: Type: , Rating: Propeller: Transit speed: Call sign: Fixed • Variable • Ducted • Call frequency: List of sounding, navigating and transmission instruments: Rada adar VHF I J • No of seamen: Sonar SSB • Netsonde Netsonde satellite navigation Other: \ \ • ^V CONSERVATION Packed in ice J | refrigeration J | Freezing in brine | | jw \ | Refrigerated sea water I I Total refrigerating power: Freezing capacity in tonnes/24 hours: Hold capacity: TYPE OF FISHING A. Demersal inshore demersal • Deep-sea demersal • Type of trawl: Cephalopods. I { Shrimps. I. J Fish I I Length of trawl: Headline: Mesh size in the body: Mesh size in the wings: Speed of trawling: : Deep-sea pelagic (tuna) Pole and line I I No of poles and lines I I Seine I J Length of net: Depth of net: No of tanks: Capacity in tonnes: C. Longlines and pots Surface Bottom j j Length of lines: : No of hooks:. No of lines: No of pots: zr SHORE INSTALLATIONS Address and permit No:. Name of firm: Activities: Domestic wholesale fish tra de I I Exp<>rt | | Type and No of wholesale trader's card: , Description of processing and conservation plant: No of employees: NB: Indicate affirmative answers by a tick in the appropriate box. Technical remarks Authorization of the Ministry of Fisheries Zl OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FISHERIES Name of vessel: Nationality (flag): Appendix 2 STATISTICS ON CATCH AND ACTIVITY Engine rating: Gross registered tonnage: Fishing zone Date Longitude Latitude Number of fishing operations Number of fishing hours ' , ^ ' 1/ 2/ 3/ 4/ SI 6/ 7/ 8/ 9/ 10/ 11/ 12/ 13/ 14/ 15/ 16/ 17/ 18/ 19/ 2 0/ 2 1/ 22/ 2 3/ 24/ 25/ 26/ 27/ 2 8/ 2 9 /. 30/ 3 1/ Month: Year: Fishing method: Port of landing: Species of fish i Totals i 1 ! 1 i • • Afip'"d-3 ICGfiï LOBBOOK for TUNA FISHERY FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. TITLE OF OPERATION New Protocol to EC-Guinea fisheries Agreement establishing the fishing possibilities and the financial compensation 2. BUDGET HEADING INVOLVED B7-8000 3. LEGAL BASIS - Article 43 of the Treaty, in conjunction with Article 228(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 228(3) thereof - EC-Guinea Agreement (OJ L 111, 27. 4. 1983) 4. DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION 4. 1 General objective Protocol and Annex for a two-year period 4. 2 Period covered and arrangements for renewal or extension 1 January 1998 to 31 December 1999 Procedure for renewal: negotiation prior to expiry of Protocol 5. CLASSIFICATION OF EXPENDITURE OR REVENUE 5. 1 5. 2 5. 3 Compulsory expenditure Differentiated appropriations Type of revenue involved 6. TYPE OF EXPENDITURE - Other: financial compensation for a third country in exchange for fishing possibilities granted by the latter and set out in the Protocol 7. FINANCIAL IMPACT 7. 1 Method of calculating total cost of operation (definition of unit costs) See Annex to Protocol s 7. 2 Itemised breakdown of cost CA (ECU million (current)) Breakdown 1998 1999 TOTAL Financial consideration - Article 2 Appropriations - Article 41 TOTAL 1. 4 1. 4 2. 8 1. 85 1. 85 3. 7 3. 25 3. 25 6. 50 7. 3 Indicative schedule of appropriations for proposed new operation 1998 1999 TOTAL 2. 8 3. 7 6. 5 (ECU million (current)) 2. 82 2. 8 3. 73 3. 7 2. 8 3. 7 6. 5 Commitment appropriations Payment appropriations 1998 1999 TOTAL Scientific and technical programmes: ECU 450 000 Maritime surveillance: ECU 800 000 Support for artisanal fishing: ECU 320 000 Institutional support for Ministry of Fisheries: ECU 800 000 Training: ECU 390 000 Contribution to international organisations: ECU 100 000 Participation in international meetings: ECU 390 000. Estimates: ECU 1. 4 million by way of the financial consideration under Article 2 and ECU 1. 4 million in appropriations under Article 4. ECU 1. 85 million by way of the financial consideration under Article 2 and ECU 1. 85 million in appropriations under Article 4. 3-1 8. FRAUD PREVENTION MEASURES; RESULTS OF MEASURES TAKEN Since it constitutes payment for a service (the possibility of fishing), the financial consideration paid by the Community is to be used by the authorities of the third country as they see fit, subject only to the forwarding of reports on the use of certain appropriations to the Community in accordance with the provisions of each Agreement. In the case of Guinea, an annual report must be submitted on the implementation of all the measures covered by Article 4 of the Protocol and the results achieved; payments may be reconsidered in the light of the actual implementation of the various measures. Furthermore, the Member States must guarantee the accuracy of figures on vessels' tonnage certificates so the calculation of the financial consideration (and fees) is not open lo dispute. To that end, the Agreement provides for statements of catches by Community vessels. 9. ELEMENTS OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS 1996-97 Category Fishing possibilities (grt) Rate of utilisation Trawlers: - of which shrimp trawlers of which cephalopod trawlers fin-fish and Tuna seiners Polc-and-line tuna vessels Surface longliners Total tuna vessels 5 000 (sole category) 1997: 60% 1996: 20% 28 vessels 7 vessels 7 vessels 42 vessels 91% 86% 79% 1998-99 Fishing possibilities (grt) breakdown 1000 4 000 33 vessels 13 vessels 28 vessels 74 vessels The EC-Guinea Agreement granted up to 12 000 grt worth of fishing possibilities until 1993. Competition from illegal fishing turned Community vessels away from the Agreement and induced the Community to reduce its trawler fishing possibilities to 5 000 grt under the last Protocol applying, with a proportional reduction in the financial consideration borne by the EC budget. In 1996, the new authorities in Guinea set about improving conditions in the fisheries sector, which entailed in particular the rational management of access to resources and better scientific indices for stocks available for fishing. This new situation had the positive effect of enticing a significant number of Community vessels to return to local waters in 1997, as confirmed by overall applications for trawler fishing possibilities submitted \7 •"» by Community shipowners under the forthcoming Protocol, which cover a total of 8 840 grt, i. e. more than the 5 000 grt in the current Protocol. Guinea also has a significant cephalopod catch potential. This is already being fished at present and will be very useful during biological recovery periods provided for in Agreements with neighbouring countries (Morocco, Mauritania and, where applicable, Senegal), or as an area for redeploying the cephalopod fishing fleet should any reduction in the fishing possibilities under the Agreement with Morocco exclude it from Moroccan waters. For the sake of caution and with an eye to the stringency demanded by the Council (in the conclusions of the Council meeting on fisheries of 30 October 1997), the Community has limited its purchases of trawler fishing possibilities for 1998-99 to the previous level of 5 000 grt, albeit specifying the categories so Guinea can draw up its annual fishing plans more easily. Although the fishing possibilities remain stable, the Agreement should be reassessed in financial terms since, fishing conditions being comparable at subregional level, the financial conditions per grt offered Guinea should be brought into line, in accordance with the consistency sought by the Council, with those the Community has granted neighbouring countries, bearing in mind the specific character of the resources (biologically and in terms of commercial value) available in Guinea's fishing zone. In view of the scale of the adjustment involved (from ECU 400/grt (under the last Protocol) to ECU 740/grt), harmonisation has been spread over two years and will'only become effective in 1999. This explains the increase in the financial consideration during the two years covered by the Protocol and the fact that the overall financial compensation rises from ECU 4. 0 million to ECU 6. 5 million for two years. The Guinean authorities have also refused to consider a protocol covering more than two years as the Community would have liked. Tuna fishing possibilities rise from 42 to 74 vessels. The Agreement also allows nearly 100 vessels into Guinea's EEZ (approximately 25 trawlers and 74 tuna vessels) compared with the 67 vessels in the previous Protocol. ECU 3. 25 million has been earmarked for measures to develop fishing (scientific research, maritime surveillance, training, support for artisanal fishing, etc. ). These measures account for 50% of the total cost of the Agreement as compared with 40% under the previous Protocol, bearing witness to the Commission's desire to ensure that, alongside the development of fishing activities by Community vessels, there is sustainable development of the Guinean fisheries industry and closer monitoring of the implementation of measures (cf. Article 4 of the Protocol). Shipowners' fees are increased by 5% from 1 January 1999. The advances paid by tuna vessel owners for tuna fishing licences will also rise to: - ECU 1 800 from ECU 1 500 for tuna seiners; - ECU 500 from ECU 300 for surface longliners, with a view to strengthening the sense of responsibility of owners. As regards the benefit of the Agreement, given the commercial value of the cephalopods, shrimps and demersal fish that can be caught in Guinea under the -7 17 Agreement, the value of catches far exceeds the cost (ECU 6. 5 million) of the Agreement. On top of the direct commercial value of the catches, the Agreement has the following advantages: - guaranteed jobs on board fishing vessels, - multiplier effect on employment in ports, fish auctions, processing plants, shipyards and service industries in the regions concerned, - job creation in regions where there is no alternative to fisheries, - supply of fishery products to the Community market. Naturally, in addition to these advantages, account should be taken of the importance of the EU's relations with the Republic of Guinea at political level as well as for the fishing industry. 10. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE (PART A OF THE BUDGET) No impact on administrative expenditure. 3Y ISSN 0254-1475 COM(98) 129 final DOCUMENTS EN 03 11 06 Catalogue number : CB-CO-98-135-EN-C ISBN 92-78-31787-X Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg 3-r


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 646/98 by Monica BALDI to the Commission. Species that may be hunted

eurovoc_concepts:
bird
hunting regulations
protected species
protection of animal life
protection of animals
wildlife

formats: html pdf print

text: 11. 12. 98 FI Euroopan yhteis(cid:246)jen virallinen lehti C 386/31 (98/C 386/038) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-0617/98 esitt(cid:228)j(cid:228)(t): Nikitas Kaklamanis (UPE) komissiolle (9. maaliskuuta 1998) Aihe: Pienten kalliosaarten sis(cid:228)llytt(cid:228)minen Interreg-ohjelmaan Saamieni tietojen mukaan Kreikan hallitus › toimien aivan oikein › sis(cid:228)llytti kuusi Egeanmeren pient(cid:228) kalliosaarta Interreg-ohjelmaan. Haluaisin saada tiet(cid:228)(cid:228) Euroopan komissiolta, mik(cid:228) on sen virallinen n(cid:228)kemys asiasta, sek(cid:228) aikooko se rahoittaa hankkeiden toteuttamista n(cid:228)ill(cid:228) pienill(cid:228) saarilla, jotka aivan ilmeisesti kuuluvat Kreikan valtion (ja siis Euroopan unionin) alueeseen. Komission j(cid:228)senen Monika Wulf-Mathiesin komission puolesta antama vastaus (7. toukokuuta 1998) Komissio on osallistunut toimien ja hankkeiden rahoitukseen koko Kreikan alueella siit(cid:228) asti, kun Kreikka liittyi yhteis(cid:246)(cid:246)n vuonna 1981. Komissio osallistuu rakennerahastojen kautta sellaisten toimien ja hankkeiden rahoitukseen, joilla pyrit(cid:228)(cid:228)n kehitt(cid:228)m(cid:228)(cid:228)n Kreikan mantereen ja saariston syrj(cid:228)isimpi(cid:228) alueita. Rahoitusta my(cid:246)nnet(cid:228)(cid:228)n yhteis(cid:246)n tukikehykseen vuosina 1994›1999 kuuluvista erilaisista alakohtaisista ja alueellisista ohjelmista ja yhteis(cid:246)aloitteiden, kuten Interreg II -ohjelman mukaisesti. (98/C 386/039) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-0646/98 esitt(cid:228)j(cid:228)(t): Monica Baldi (PPE) komissiolle (9. maaliskuuta 1998) Aihe: Lajit joita on lupa mets(cid:228)st(cid:228)(cid:228) huhtikuuta 1979 annetun direktiivin 79/409/ETY (1) liitteess(cid:228) II lueteltuja lajeja on lupa mets(cid:228)st(cid:228)(cid:228) 2. j(cid:228)senvaltion lains(cid:228)(cid:228)d(cid:228)nn(cid:246)n mukaisesti. Liitteess(cid:228) II olevassa 2 osassa lueteltuja lajeja saa kuitenkin mets(cid:228)st(cid:228)(cid:228) vain niiss(cid:228) j(cid:228)senvaltiossa, joista on maininta. Kottarainen mainitaan liitteess(cid:228) II olevassa 2 osassa kaikissa Euroopan unionin V(cid:228)limeren maissa Italiaa lukuunottamatta. Maatalousministeri(cid:246)n 6. elokuuta 1997 p(cid:228)iv(cid:228)(cid:228)m(cid:228)ll(cid:228) kirjeell(cid:228) (p(cid:246)yt(cid:228)kirja 23. 035) pyydettiin lupaa niiden lajien mets(cid:228)st(cid:228)miseen, joita ei ole sis(cid:228)llytetty luetteloon, mutta joita voidaan mets(cid:228)st(cid:228)(cid:228) 11. helmikuuta 1992 annetun lain N:o 157 18 artiklan nojalla. Luonnonvaraisista el(cid:228)imist(cid:228) vastaava kansallinen laitos antoi puoltavan lausunnon, jossa se otti huomioon lajin s(cid:228)ilymisen tyydytt(cid:228)v(cid:228)ll(cid:228) tasolla, sen laajan levinneisyyden, muuttovirrat sek(cid:228) arvostuksen ja viljelyksille aiheuttamat vahingot. 1. Voiko komissio sanoa, mihin pikaisiin toimenpiteisiin se aikoo ryhty(cid:228) ottaen huomioon Italian esitt(cid:228)m(cid:228)n pyynn(cid:246)n kottaraisen sis(cid:228)llytt(cid:228)miseksi liitteess(cid:228) II olevaan 2 osaan? 2. Mihin toimiin se aikoo ryhty(cid:228) vahvistaakseen ennen tarkistuspyynn(cid:246)n hyv(cid:228)ksymist(cid:228) yleisen poikkeusj(cid:228)r- jestelm(cid:228)n niiden vahinkojen hillitsemiseksi, joita linnut aiheuttavat viljelyksille? (1) EYVL L 103, 25. 4. 1979, s. 1


title: INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA n. 634/98 dell'on. Angela SIERRA GONZÁLEZ alla Commissione. Impianto dell'impresa Parlevilet a Puerto de Las Palmas

eurovoc_concepts:
Canary Islands
FIFG
Netherlands
building subsidy
cold store
fishing agreement
fishing fleet
fishing industry
fishing regulations
harbour installation

formats: html print


title: PERGUNTA ESCRITA n. 644/98 do Deputado Jorge HERNANDEZ MOLLAR à Comissão. Condições de promoção dos engenheiros técnicos espanhóis em comparação com outras situações

eurovoc_concepts:
European official
Spain
administrator
competition (EU)
diploma
engineer
equal treatment
equivalence of diplomas
recognition of studies
recruitment

text: 19. 11. 98 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias C 354/13 (98/C 354/24) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-0643/98 apresentada por Jorge Hernandez Mollar (PPE) a‘ Comissa(cid:152)o (9 de Mar(cid:231)o de 1998) Objecto: Condi(cid:231)o(cid:152)es de promo(cid:231)a(cid:152)o dos engenheiros te·cnicos espanho·is em compara(cid:231)a(cid:152)o com outras situa(cid:231)o(cid:152)es Por que raza(cid:152)o a Comissa(cid:152)o exigiu, na versa(cid:152)o espanhola do anu·ncio de convocato·ria dos concursos gerais COM/A/720 e COM/A/721 (JO CE no C 52 A, de 28. 2. 1991), que os candidatos fossem titulares de um diploma «superior» e na(cid:152)o incluiu a referida exige(cid:136)ncia nas outras verso(cid:152)es lingu(cid:14)·sticas do referido anu·ncio de concurso? (98/C 354/25) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-0644/98 apresentada por Jorge Hernandez Mollar (PPE) a‘ Comissa(cid:152)o (9 de Mar(cid:231)o de 1998) Objecto: Condi(cid:231)o(cid:152)es de promo(cid:231)a(cid:152)o dos engenheiros te·cnicos espanho·is em compara(cid:231)a(cid:152)o com outras situa(cid:231)o(cid:152)es Que motivos levaram a Comissa(cid:152)o a exigir uma condi(cid:231)a(cid:152)o que na(cid:152)o figura no texto da convocato·ria, a posse de um diploma de ciclo longo (equivalente a licenciatura), ao engenheiro te·cnico espanhol, Vicente Alonso Morales, candidato ao concurso geral COM/A/1047 (JO C 145 A, de 13. 5. 1997)? (98/C 354/26) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-0645/98 apresentada por Jorge Hernandez Mollar (PPE) a‘ Comissa(cid:152)o (9 de Mar(cid:231)o de 1998) Objecto: Condi(cid:231)o(cid:152)es de promo(cid:231)a(cid:152)o dos engenheiros te·cnicos espanho·is em compara(cid:231)a(cid:152)o com outras situa(cid:231)o(cid:152)es Por que raza(cid:152)o a Comissa(cid:152)o exigiu a posse de um diploma universita·rio na versa(cid:152)o espanhola do anu·ncio da convocato·ria do concurso geral COM/A/1047 (JO CE no C 145 A, de 13. 5. 1997) e na(cid:152)o incluiu a referida exige(cid:136)ncia na versa(cid:152)o alema(cid:152) do referido anu·ncio de concurso? (98/C 354/27) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-0669/98 apresentada por Antoni Gutie·rrez D(cid:14)·az (GUE/NGL) a‘ Comissa(cid:152)o (10 de Mar(cid:231)o de 1998) Objecto: Condi(cid:231)o(cid:152)es de promo(cid:231)a(cid:152)o dos engenheiros te·cnicos espanho·is em compara(cid:231)a(cid:152)o com outras situa(cid:231)o(cid:152)es E· certo que a Comissa(cid:152)o admite ou admitiu as candidaturas dos titulares de um «Fachhochschuldiplom» nos concursos ou provas gerais para o recrutamento de funciona·rios da categoria A/LA na fun(cid:231)a(cid:152)o pu·blica europeia? (98/C 354/28) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-0670/98 apresentada por Antoni Gutie·rrez D(cid:14)·az (GUE/NGL) a‘ Comissa(cid:152)o (10 de Mar(cid:231)o de 1998) Objecto: Condi(cid:231)o(cid:152)es de promo(cid:231)a(cid:152)o dos engenheiros te·cnicos espanho·is em compara(cid:231)a(cid:152)o com outras situa(cid:231)o(cid:152)es Considera a Comissa(cid:152)o que o «Fachhochschuldiplom» e· o mais alto diploma obtido na Alemanha ou que, pelo contra·rio, o mais alto t(cid:14)·tulo universita·rio do referido Estado-membro e· o «Hochschuldiplom»? (98/C 354/29) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-0671/98 apresentada por Antoni Gutie·rrez D(cid:14)·az (GUE/NGL) a‘ Comissa(cid:152)o (10 de Mar(cid:231)o de 1998) Objecto: Condi(cid:231)o(cid:152)es de promo(cid:231)a(cid:152)o dos engenheiros te·cnicos espanho·is em compara(cid:231)a(cid:152)o com outras situa(cid:231)o(cid:152)es Considera a Comissa(cid:152)o que o «Fachhochschuldiplom» confere uma habilita(cid:231)a(cid:152)o superior a‘ de engenheiro te·cnico? Por que razo(cid:152)es?


title: 98/216/EZ: Odluka Vijeća od 9. ožujka 1998. o sklapanju, u ime Europske zajednice, Konvencije Ujedinjenih naroda o suzbijanju dezertifikacije u zemljama pogođenim jakim sušama i/ili dezertifikacijom, posebno u Africi

eurovoc_concepts:
Africa
UN convention
arid zone
desertification
drought
the EU's international role

text: L_1998083HR. 01000101. xml 11/Sv. 16 HR Službeni list Europske unije 117 31998D0216 L 083/1 SLUŽBENI LIST EUROPSKE UNIJE ODLUKA VIJEĆA od 9. ožujka 1998. o sklapanju, u ime Europske zajednice, Konvencije Ujedinjenih naroda o suzbijanju dezertifikacije u zemljama pogođenim jakim sušama i/ili dezertifikacijom, posebno u Africi (98/216/EZ) VIJEĆE EUROPSKE UNIJE, uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o osnivanju Europske zajednice, a posebno njegov članak 130. r stavak 4. i članak 130. y, u vezi s prvom rečenicom njegovog članka 228. stavka 2. i prvim podstavkom njegovog stavka 3. , uzimajući u obzir prijedlog Komisije (1), uzimajući u obzir mišljenje Europskog parlamenta (2), budući da je Komisija u ime Zajednice sudjelovala u pregovorima za pripremu međunarodne Konvencije o suzbijanju dezertifikacije u skladu s ovlastima dobivenim od Vijeća; budući da je ta Konvencija potpisana u ime Zajednice u Parizu 14. listopada 1994. ; budući da je cilj te Konvencije suzbijanje dezertifikacije i ublažavanje posljedica suše u zemljama koje su teško pogođene sušama i/ili dezertifikacijom, posebno u Africi, djelotvornim radnjama na svim razinama potpomognutim međunarodnom suradnjom i partnerskim dogovorima u okviru integriranog pristupa čiji je cilj pridonositi ostvarenju održivog razvoja u pogođenim područjima; budući da je dezertifikacija jedan od glavnih problema okoliša uzrokovanih složenim međusobnim djelovanjem fizičkih, bioloških, političkih, društvenih, kulturnih i gospodarskih čimbenika; budući da je Zajednica donijela mjere, uključujući zakonodavne akte, i poduprla inicijative na područjima uređenim Konvencijom te je njena dužnost potvrditi i ispunjavati svoje obveze na tom području i na međunarodnoj razini; budući da politika Zajednice u području okoliša na međunarodnoj razini pridonosi poticanju mjera koje su namijenjene da se uhvate u koštac s regionalnim ili globalnim pitanjima okoliša, uključujući i dezertifikaciju; budući da politika Zajednice o razvojnoj suradnji potiče održiv gospodarski i društveni razvoj zemalja u razvoju, posebno onih najsiromašnijih među njima, te iskorjenjivanje siromaštva u zemljama u razvoju, koji, među ostalim, također predstavljaju dva cilja Konvencije; budući da Konvencija uključuje odredbe za pomoć pri osnivanju inicijativa za zaštitu okoliša, te na taj način suzbija dezertifikaciju u sjevernom Sredozemlju; budući da takve mjere stoga pomažu u rješavanju regionalnih pitanja okoliša; budući da politika Zajednice na području znanstvenih i tehnoloških istraživanja značajno pridonosi zaštiti okoliša i suzbijanju dezertifikacije, posebno putem specifičnih programa znanstvene i tehnološke suradnje s trećim zemljama te pomoću aktivnosti Programa za okoliš i klimu u okviru globalnih promjena; budući da se sklapanje Konvencije može uzeti u obzir pri budućem donošenju mjera koje se odnose na posebne inicijative u području gospodarskog i društvenog razvoja; budući da Zajednica i države članice, u okviru svojih pripadajućih nadležnosti, surađuju s trećim zemljama i mjerodavnim međunarodnim organizacijama; budući da su sve države članice već sklopile Konvenciju polažući svoje isprave o ratifikaciji; budući da sklapanje Konvencije od strane Zajednice može pripomoći ostvarenju ciljeva utvrđenih u člancima 130. a, 130. b i 130. u Ugovora, ODLUČILO JE: Članak 1. Konvencija Ujedinjenih naroda o suzbijanju dezertifikacije u zemljama pogođenim jakim sušama i/ili dezertifikacijom, posebno u Africi, odobrena je ovim u ime Zajednice. Cijeli tekst Konvencije i izjava o nadležnosti predviđeni u članku 34. stavcima 2. i 3. te Konvencije priloženi su ovoj Odluci. Članak 2. Predsjednik Vijeća ovim je ovlašten imenovati osobu ili osobe ovlaštene za polaganje isprave o ratifikaciji Konvencije kod glavnog tajnika Ujedinjenih naroda, u skladu s člankom 34. Konvencije. Ta osoba ili osobe istodobno polažu izjavu o nadležnosti priloženu ovoj Odluci. Članak 3. Stajalište koje Zajednica treba usvojiti na Konferenciji stranaka, kada to tijelo bude pozvano da donese odluke s pravnim učinkom, usvaja Vijeće kvalificiranom većinom, na prijedlog Komisije. Zajednicu na Konferenciji stranaka zastupa Komisija u slučaju predmeta koji su u ovlasti Zajednice. Članak 4. Ova se Odluka objavljuje u Službenom listu Europskih zajednica. Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 9. ožujka 1998. Za Vijeće Predsjednik G. BROWN (1)  SL C 299, 30. 9. 1997. , str. 1. (2)  SL C 339, 10. 11. 1997


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 610/98 by Esko SEPPÄNEN to the Commission. Chernobyl nuclear power station and funding of new nuclear power stations in Ukraine

eurovoc_concepts:
Community loan
EBRD
Ukraine
decommissioning of power stations
nuclear accident
nuclear power station
nuclear reactor
nuclear safety
protocol to an agreement

text: C 323/54 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 21. 10. 98 Fo¤r o¤vrigt na¤mns inte linbanor bland de projekt som go¤r en miljo¤konsekvensanalys obligatorisk enligt direktiv 85/337/EEG om utva¤rdering av effekterna av vissa offentliga och privata miljo¤projekt. Kommissionen har va¤nt sig till de spanska myndigheterna med en bega¤ran att dessa skall fo¤rsa¤kra sig om att projektet inte skadar miljo¤n. (1) EGT C 102, 3. 4. 1998, s. 51. (2) Parlamentsdebatter (mars 1998). (3) EGT L 103, 25. 4. 1979. (98/C 323/72) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-0610/98 fr(cid:229)n Esko Seppa¤nen (GUE/NGL) till kommissionen (9 mars 1998) A¤mne: Ka¤rnkraftverket i Tjernobyl och finansieringen av nya ka¤rnkraftverk i Ukraina Ka¤rnkraftverket i Tjernobyl utgo¤r en stor sa¤kerhetsrisk fo¤r hela Europa. Uppenbarligen fortsa¤tter verksamheten vid ka¤rnkraftverket, eftersom EU och Europeiska banken fo¤r (cid:229)teruppbyggnad och utveckling inte har uppfyllt alla sina skyldigheter betra¤ffande finansieringen av alternativa metoder fo¤r energiproduktion i Ukraina. Vilka (cid:229)tga¤rder a¤mnar kommissionen vidta i denna fr(cid:229)ga, och a¤r den beredd att finansiera de nya, halvfa¤rdiga ka¤rnkraftverken i Ukraina fo¤r att man skall kunna sta¤nga ka¤rnkraftverket i Tjernobyl? Svar fr(cid:229)n Hans van den Broek p(cid:229) kommissionens va¤gnar (30 mars 1998) Kommissionen delar den (cid:229)sikt som fr(cid:229)gesta¤llaren uttrycker om riskerna i samband med att man fortsa¤tter att driva ka¤rnkraftsreaktorerna i Tjernobyl. Det a¤r av sto¤rsta vikt att ka¤rnkraftsverket i Tjernobyl sta¤ngs (cid:229)r 2000. Kommissionen ger sitt fulla sto¤d till genomfo¤randet av det samfo¤rst(cid:229)ndsavtal om sta¤ngning av Tjernobyl som undertecknades av G7 och Ukraina i december 1995. Genomfo¤randet av samfo¤rst(cid:229)ndsavtalet framskrider redan va¤l. 1 miljard US-dollar (925 miljoner ecu) har anskaffats huvudsakligen i form av l(cid:229)n avsedda fo¤r bra¤nsleleveranser, (cid:229)tersta¤llning av anla¤ggningen och fo¤r energibesparande (cid:229)tga¤rder. 500 miljoner US-dollar (465 miljoner ecu) har anskaffats i form av g(cid:229)vobist(cid:229)nd avsett fo¤r sta¤ngning av Tjernobyl och sarkofagen. Parlamentet behandlar fo¤r na¤rvarande ett fo¤rslag fr(cid:229)n kommissionen till r(cid:229)dets beslut betra¤ffande bidrag p(cid:229) upp till 100 miljoner ecu till Fonden fo¤r inkapsling av Tjernobyl (1). Vid toppmo¤tet mellan gemenskapen och Ukraina den 5 september 1997 bekra¤ftade president Kuchma (cid:229)terigen att det a¤r uppenbart att sta¤ngningen av Tjernobyl a¤r kopplad till att de tv(cid:229) ka¤rnkraftsreaktorerna i Rovno och Khmelnitsky fa¤rdigsta¤lls. Principiellt kan kommissionen ta¤nka sig att finansiera Rovno 4- och Khmelnitsky 2-projektet med upp till 50 % genom Euratoml(cid:229)n, under fo¤rutsa¤ttning att fo¤ljande krav a¤r uppfyllda: › Sa¤kerhetsniv(cid:229)n i de fa¤rdiga reaktorerna motsvarar internationella standarder. › No¤dva¤ndiga kompletterande medel, exempelvis fr(cid:229)n Europeiska banken fo¤r (cid:229)teruppbyggnad och utveckling (EBRD), a¤r tillga¤ngliga. › Ukraina uppfyller de tekniska och finansiella villkor samt o¤vriga villkor som kommer att faststa¤llas i det l(cid:229)neavtal som skall fo¤rhandlas fram. (1) EGT C 364, 2. 12. 1997


title: PREGUNTA ESCRITA n. 646/98 del Monica BALDI a la Comisión. Especies cuya caza está autorizada

text: 11. 12. 98 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europead C 386/31 (98/C 386/038) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-0617/98 de Nikitas Kaklamanis (UPE) a la Comisi(cid:243)n (9 de marzo de 1998) Asunto: Integraci(cid:243)n de islotes en el programa INTERREG Segœn informaciones, el Gobierno griego, en una actuaci(cid:243)n acertada, ha integrado seis islotes del mar Egeo en el programa INTERREG. ¿Puede indicar la Comisi(cid:243)n su posici(cid:243)n oficial al respecto y si tiene intenci(cid:243)n de financiar la realizaci(cid:243)n de proyectos en estos islotes que, sin lugar a dudas, forman parte del territorio griego (y, por tanto, europeo)? Respuesta de la Sra. Wulf-Mathies en nombre de la Comisi(cid:243)n (7 de mayo de 1998) Desde 1981, fecha de la adhesi(cid:243)n de Grecia a la Comunidad, la Comisi(cid:243)n cofinancia medidas y proyectos en todo el territorio griego. Dentro de diversos programas sectoriales y regionales del marco comunitario de apoyo de 1994-1999, as(cid:237) como de los programas de iniciativas comunitarias como INTERREG II, la Comisi(cid:243)n cofinancia mediante los Fondos estructurales medidas y proyectos cuyo objetivo es el desarrollo de zonas perifØricas continentales e insulares de Grecia. (98/C 386/039) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-0646/98 de Monica Baldi (PPE) a la Comisi(cid:243)n (9 de marzo de 1998) Asunto: Especies cuya caza estÆ autorizada En virtud de la Directiva 79/409/CEE (1) y en el marco de la legislaci(cid:243)n del Estado miembro, estÆ autorizada la caza de las especies que se enumeran en el Anexo II. No obstante, las especies que figuran en el Anexo II/2 podrÆn cazarse exclusivamente en el Estado miembro en el que estØn mencionadas. El estornino figura en el Anexo II/2 en todos los Estados de la cuenca mediterrÆnea de la Uni(cid:243)n Europea, con la excepci(cid:243)n de Italia. Vista la solicitud presentada por el Ministerio para las Pol(cid:237)ticas Agr(cid:237)colas, mediante carta de 6 de agosto de 1997, protocolo 23. 035, de autorizar el ejercicio de la caza de esta especie excluida de la lista a que se refiere el art(cid:237)culo 18 de la Ley 157 de 11 de febrero de 1992; visto el dictamen conforme emitido por el Instituto Nacional para la Fauna Silvestre en el que se tiene en cuenta el nivel satisfactorio de conservaci(cid:243)n, la amplia distribuci(cid:243)n y la tendencia del flujo migratorio, y vistas las estimaciones y los daæos provocados en los cultivos; 1. 2. ¿Puede decir la Comisi(cid:243)n cuÆles medidas urgentes tiene la intenci(cid:243)n de adoptar para dar curso a la solicitud presentada por Italia de que se incluya el estornino en el Anexo II/2? ¿QuØ iniciativas tiene la intenci(cid:243)n de emprender, hasta la adopci(cid:243)n de la solicitud modificada, para otorgar un rØgimen general de excepci(cid:243)n con el fin de contener los daæos provocados en la agricultura? (1) DO L 103 de 25. 4. 1979, p. 1


title: Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 539/98 af 9. marts 1998 om ændring af forordning (EØF) nr. 3077/78 om anerkendelse af attester, der ledsager humle indført fra tredjelande, og som er ligestillet med Fællesskabets attester

eurovoc_concepts:
health certificate
hops
import
marketing standard
plant health control
third country

text: 10. 3. 98 ‹ ‹DA De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende L 70/3 KOMMISSIONENS FORORDNING (EF) Nr. 539/98 af 9. marts 1998 om ændring af forordning (EØF) nr. 3077/78 om anerkendelse af attester, der ledsager humle indført fra tredjelande, og som er ligestillet med Fællesskabets attester KOMMISSIONEN FOR DE EUROPÆISKE FÆLLESSKABER HAR — under henvisning til Europæiske Fællesskab, traktaten om oprettelse af Det under henvisning til R(cid:134)dets forordning (EØF) nr. 1696/71 af 26. juli 1971 om den fælles markedsordning for humle (1), senest ændret ved forordning (EF) nr. 1554/ 97 (2), særlig artikel 5, stk. 2, og ud fra følgende betragtninger: Ved Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 3077/78 (3), senest ændret ved forordning (EF) nr. 2132/95 (4), er det fastsat, at attester, der ledsager humle indført fra visse tredjelande, kan ligestilles med Fællesskabets attester, og der er fastsat en fortegnelse over de organer i de p(cid:134)gæl- dende lande, som har bemyndigelse til at udstede ligestil- lingsattester, samt en fortegnelse over de produkter, der er fra Polen er det omfattet; som følge af oplysninger nødvendigt at ændre bilaget 3077/78; til forordning (EØF) nr. de i forordning (EØF) nr. 3077/78 fastsatte foranstalt- ninger er i overensstemmelse med udtalelse fra Forvalt- ningskomit(cid:130)en for Humle — UDSTEDT FØLGENDE FORORDNING: Artikel 1 Bilaget anført i bilaget til denne forordning. forordning (EØF) nr. 3077/78 affattes som til Artikel 2 Denne forordning træder i kraft p(cid:134) syvendedagen efter offentliggørelsen i De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende. Denne forordning er bindende i alle enkeltheder og gælder umiddelbart medlemsstat. i hver Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 9. marts 1998. P(cid:134) Kommissionens vegne Franz FISCHLER Medlem af Kommissionen (1) EFT L 175 af 4. 8. 1971, s. 1. (2) EFT L 208 af 2. 8. 1997, s. 1. (3) EFT L 367 af 28. 12. 1978, s. 28. (4) EFT L 214 af 8. 9. 1995, s. 7. L 70/4 ‹ ‹DA De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende 10. 3. 98 BILAG ORGANER BERETTIGET TIL UDSTEDELSE AF ATTESTER FOR Humlekopper Humlepulver KN-kode: ex 1210 KN-kode: ex 1210 Safter og ekstrakter af humle KN-kode: 1302 13 00 Oprindelses- land Udstedelsesberettigede organer Adresse Kode Tlf. Fax Australien Quarantine and Quality Assurance Branch Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries GPO Box 192B Hobart TAS 7001 +. 61. 02. 33-8011 34-6785 Ovens Research Station Department of Agriculture PO Box 235 Myrtleford, Victoria 3737 +. 61. 57. 51-1311 51-1702 Bulgarien Institute of Brewing and Hop Production Canada Plant Protection Division Animal and Plant Health Directorate Food Production and Inspection Branch Agriculture and Agri-food Canada Gorubljane Sofia 1738 Floor 2, West Wing 59 Camelot Drive Napean, Ontario, Canada K1A OY9 +. 359. 2. 75-4153 75-6194 +. 1. 613 952-8000 991-5612 Folkerepublikken Kina China Tianjin Import & Export Commodity Inspection Bureau 33, Youyi Road Tianjin 300201 +. 86. 22. 432-4143 832-0842 China Xinjiang Import & Export Commodity Inspection Bureau Fu 6, Beijing Nan Lu Wulumuqi 830011 +. 86. 991. 484-2708 484-0050 China Neimenggu Import & Export Commodity Inspection Bureau Zhaowuda Road Huhehaote 010010 +. 86. 471. 45-1156 45-1163 Ungarn Budapest/F(cid:148)v ´arosi/ (cid:1)Allateg(cid:130)szs(cid:130)g(cid:129)gyi (cid:130)s (cid:144)lelmiszerellen(cid:148)rz(cid:148) (cid:1)Allom ´as New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Cawthorn Institute Polen Agricultural and Food Quality Inspection Rumænien Cluj-Napoca University of Agricultural Sciences Bucharest Institute of Food Chemistry Lehel u. 43-47 1135 Budapest PO Box 2526 Wellington Private Bag Nelson ul. Zurawia 32/34 skr. poczt. 25 00-950 Warszawa Strada Manastur no. 3 Cluj-Napoca Strada Garlei no. 1 Sector 1 Bucharest +. 36. 1. 129-7012 140-9394 +. 64. 4. 472-0367 474-4240 472-9071 +. 64. 3. 548-2319 546-9464 +. 48. 2. 621-6421 621-4858 +. 406. 419-8792 419-3792 +. 40. 1. 679-5090 212-0305 Institut za Ratarstvo I Povrtlarstvo/Zavod sa Hmelj Den Føderative Republik Jugoslavien (Serbien og Montenegro) Yu-21470 Backi Petrovac +. 381. 21. 780-365 621-212 10. 3. 98 ‹ ‹DA De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende L 70/5 Oprindelses- land Udstedelsesberettigede organer Adresse Kode Tlf. Fax Slovakiet (cid:1)Ustredn ´y kontroln ´y a sk ´usobn ´y ´ustav polnohospod ´arsky Mat ´uskova 21 833 16 Bratislava +. 42. 7. 37-5666 37-7436 Slovenien Institut za hmeljarstvo in pivovarstvo Zalec Sydafrika CSIR Food Science and Technology Ul. Zalskega tabora 2 63310 Zalec PO Box 395 0001 Pretoria +. 386. 63 715-214 712-163 +. 27. 12 841-3172 841-3594 Schweiz Versuchsstation Schweizerischer Brauereien (VSB) Engimattstrasse 11 +. 41. 1. 201-4244 201-4249 8059 Z(cid:129)rich Tjekkiet Ukraine USA St ´atn(cid:146) kontroln(cid:146) a zkusebn(cid:146) zemedelsk ´y Brno odbor chmele Zatec ´ustav Chmelarsk(cid:130) n ´amest(cid:146) 1612 438 43 Zatec +. 42. 397. 2-751 2-752 4-003 Productional-Technical Centre (PTZ) Ukrhmel Hlebnaja 27 262028 Zhitomir +. 7. 0412 37-2111 36-7331 Washington Department of Agriculture State Chemical and Hop Lab 2017 South First Street Yakima, WA +. 1. 509. 575-2759 454-7699 Idaho Department of Agriculture Hop Inspection Lab 2270 Old Penitentiary Road PO Box 790 Boise, ID 83701 +. 1. 208 334-2623 334-2170 Oregon Department of Agriculture Commodity Inspection Division 635 Capital Street NE Salem, OR 97310 +. 1. 503. 986-4620 373-1479 USDA, GIPSA, FGIS USDA, GIPSA, FGIS Commodity Testing Laboratory Zimbabwe Standards Association of Zimbabwe 1100 NW Front Avenue PO Box 3837 Portland, OR 97208 Building 306, Room 209 BARC-East Beltsville, MD 20705-2325 Northern Close Northbridge Park PO Box 2259-Borrowdale Harare +. 1. 503. 231-2056 231-6199 +. 1. 301 504-9328 504-9200 +. 263. 4. 88-2021/2 88-2020


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 617/98 by Nikitas KAKLAMANIS to the Commission. Inclusion of islets in the INTERREG programme

eurovoc_concepts:
Community support framework
EU financing
EU programme
EU regional policy
Greece
Structural Funds
operational programme
regional development
structural policy

text: 11. 12. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 386/31 (98/C 386/038) WRITTEN QUESTION E-0617/98 by Nikitas Kaklamanis (UPE) to the Commission (9 March 1998) Subject: Inclusion of islets in the Interreg programme It is reported that the Greek Government has, quite justifiably, included six Aegean islets in the Interreg programme. Will the Commission give its official views on this matter and say whether it intends to fund projects on these islets which quite patently form part of Greek (and therefore European) territory? Answer given by Mrs Wulf-Mathies on behalf of the Commission (7 May 1998) Since 1981, when Greece acceded to the Community, the Commission has been part-financing measures and projects throughout that country. Through the Structural Funds, the Commission part-finances measures and projects to assist the development of peripheral areas of mainland Greece and the islands under various sectoral and regional programmes in the 1994-1999 Community Support Framework and under Community initiative programmes such as Interreg II. (98/C 386/039) WRITTEN QUESTION E-0646/98 by Monica Baldi (PPE) to the Commission (9 March 1998) Subject: Species that may be hunted The species listed in Annex II to Directive 79/409/EEC (1) of 2 April 1979 may be hunted under the legislation of the Member State. The species listed in Annex II/2 however may be hunted only in the Member State in which they are mentioned. Starlings are included in Annex II/2 for all the Union(cid:146)s Mediterranean countries except Italy. In a letter dated 6 August 1997 (ref. 23. 035) the Ministry for agricultural policies requested that hunting be authorized for species excluded from the list of those that can be hunted under Article 18 of Law No 157 of 11 February 1992. The National institute for wild fauna gave its assent, taking account of the satisfactory level of conservation, the widespread distribution and migratory tendency and the estimates and damage caused to crops. 1. What urgent measures does the Commission intend to take to accede to Italy(cid:146)s request that starlings be included in Annex II/2? 2. What initiatives does it intend to take in order to grant a general system of derogation for the purpose of containing the damage caused to agriculture until adoption of the amended request? (1) OJ L 103, 25. 4. 1979, p. 1


text: 11. 12. 98 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 386/31 (98/C 386/038) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-0617/98 fr(cid:229)n Nikitas Kaklamanis (UPE) till kommissionen (9 mars 1998) ˜mne: Utvidgningen av Interregprogrammet till att omfatta klipp(cid:246)ar Enligt uppgifter har den grekiska regeringen › helt riktigt › l(cid:229)tit inf(cid:246)ra sex klipp(cid:246)ar, bel(cid:228)gna i Egeiska havet, i Interregprogrammet. Jag vill fr(cid:229)ga Europeiska kommissionen vilken dess officiella st(cid:229)ndpunkt (cid:228)r i denna fr(cid:229)ga, och om den (cid:228)mnar finansiera projekt p(cid:229) dessa klipp(cid:246)ar som alldeles uppenbart h(cid:246)r till grekiskt (och d(cid:228)rigenom allts(cid:229) europeiskt) territorium. Svar fr(cid:229)n Monika Wulf-Mathies p(cid:229) kommissionens v(cid:228)gnar (7 maj 1998) Sedan 1981 d(cid:229) Grekland ansl(cid:246)ts till gemenskapen medfinansierar kommissionen (cid:229)tg(cid:228)rder och projekt i hela Grekland. Genom strukturfonderna och inom ramen f(cid:246)r de olika sektorprogrammen och regionala programmen enligt gemenskapsst(cid:246)dramarna f(cid:246)r 1994-1999 samt gemenskapsinitiativprogram s(cid:229)som Interreg II finansierar kom- missionen (cid:229)tg(cid:228)rder och projekt som avser utvecklingen i de avl(cid:228)gset bel(cid:228)gna omr(cid:229)dena p(cid:229) grekiska fastlandet och i (cid:246)v(cid:228)rlden. (98/C 386/039) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-0646/98 fr(cid:229)n Monica Baldi (PPE) till kommissionen (9 mars 1998) ˜mne: Jaktbara arter I enlighet med direktiv 79/409/EEG (1) av den 2 april 1979 f(cid:229)r de arter som anges i bilaga II jagas inom ramen f(cid:246)r den ber(cid:246)rda medlemsstatens lagstiftning. De arter som ing(cid:229)r i bilaga II/2 f(cid:229)r dock endast jagas i den medlemsstat betr(cid:228)ffande vilka detta uttryckligen anges. Staren anges i bilaga II/2 f(cid:246)r alla unionens medlemsstater i Medelhavsomr(cid:229)det med undantag f(cid:246)r Italien. I en skrivelse av den 6 augusti 1997, protokoll nr 23. 035, beg(cid:228)rde det italienska jordbruksdepartementet att jakt p(cid:229) stare, som utesluts ur f(cid:246)rteckningen (cid:246)ver jaktbara arter i enlighet med artikel 18 i lag nr 157 av den 11 februari 1997, skall till(cid:229)tas. Det nationella institutet f(cid:246)r vilda djur har avgett ett yttrande, i vilket det konstaterar att starbest(cid:229)nden (cid:228)r tillr(cid:228)ckligt stora, att arten (cid:228)r vitt utbredd och att det (cid:228)r fr(cid:229)ga om flyttf(cid:229)glar. Med beaktande av uppskattningarna av best(cid:229)ndens storlek och av de skador som uppst(cid:229)r p(cid:229) odlingarna anmodas kommissionen att uppge: 1. 2. vilka br(cid:229)dskande (cid:229)tg(cid:228)rder den (cid:228)mnar vidta f(cid:246)r att tillm(cid:246)tesg(cid:229) det italienska departementets beg(cid:228)ran om att staren skall innefattas i bilaga II/2, vilka (cid:229)tg(cid:228)rder den (cid:228)mnar vidta f(cid:246)r att inf(cid:246)ra ett allm(cid:228)nt undantagssystem i syfte att begr(cid:228)nsa skadorna inom jordbruket (cid:228)nda tills ett (cid:228)ndrat direktiv har antagits? (1) EGT L 103, 25. 4. 1979, s. 1


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 640/98 by Jorge HERNANDEZ MOLLAR to the Commission. Conditions for upgrading the Spanish 'Ingeniero Técnico' engineering qualification in comparison with others

text: C 354/12 FI Euroopan yhteiso¤jen virallinen lehti 19. 11. 98 (98/C 354/19) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-0638/98 komissiolle esitta¤ja¤(t): Jorge Hernandez Mollar (PPE) (9. maaliskuuta 1998) Aihe: Espanjalaisen alemman insino¤o¤ritutkinnon (ingeniero te·cnico) suorittaneiden urallaetenemisvaatimukset muihin verrattuna Miksi komissio sanoo, etta¤ espanjalainen ingeniero te·cnico -tutkinto on samassa asemassa kuin ammattikorkea- ja¤lkimma¤inen tutkinto hyva¤ksyta¤a¤n suurimmassa osassa koulututkinto Fachhochschuldiplom, kun ta¤ma¤ ura-alueen A/LA sisa¤isia¤ ja avoimia kilpailuja? (98/C 354/20) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-0639/98 komissiolle esitta¤ja¤(t): Jorge Hernandez Mollar (PPE) (9. maaliskuuta 1998) Aihe: Espanjalaisen alemman insino¤o¤ritutkinnon (ingeniero te·cnico) suorittaneiden urallaetenemisvaatimukset muihin verrattuna Joissakin ja¤senvaltioissa alempi insino¤o¤ritutkinto mahdollistaa osallistumisen tohtorinarvoon ta¤hta¤ville kursseil- le. Miksi komissio kuitenkin sanoo, etta¤ alemman insino¤o¤ritutkinnon suorittaneet eiva¤t voi osallistua tohtorinarvoon ta¤hta¤a¤ville kursseille? (98/C 354/21) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-0640/98 komissiolle esitta¤ja¤(t): Jorge Hernandez Mollar (PPE) (9. maaliskuuta 1998) Aihe: Espanjalaisen alemman insino¤o¤ritutkinnon (ingeniero te·cnico) suorittaneiden urallaetenemisvaatimukset muihin verrattuna Pita¤a¤ko¤ paikkansa, etta¤ komissio on ilmoittanut Espanjan viranomaisille pelka¤a¤va¤nsa¤ sita¤, etta¤ espanjalaisten alemman insino¤o¤ritutkinnon suorittaneiden pa¤a¤sy ura-alueelle A/LA edesauttaisi muiden ja¤senvaltioiden kolmivuotisten tutkintojen suorittajien pa¤a¤sya¤ ta¤lle ura-alueelle? Onko ta¤ma¤ relevantti syy esta¤a¤ espanjalaisten alemman insino¤o¤ritutkinnon suorittaneiden osallistuminen? (98/C 354/22) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-0641/98 komissiolle esitta¤ja¤(t): Jorge Hernandez Mollar (PPE) (9. maaliskuuta 1998) Aihe: Espanjalaisen alemman insino¤o¤ritutkinnon (ingeniero te·cnico) suorittaneiden urallaetenemisvaatimukset muihin verrattuna Mista¤ syysta¤ brittila¤isten kolmivuotiset Bachelor of Arts, Bachelor of Science ja Bachelor of Engineering -tutkinnot suorittaneet voivat osallistua kilpailuihin, mutta espanjalaisen alemman insino¤o¤ritutkinnon suoritta- nutta ei hyva¤ksyta¤? (98/C 354/23) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-0642/98 komissiolle esitta¤ja¤(t): Jorge Hernandez Mollar (PPE) (9. maaliskuuta 1998) Aihe: Espanjalaisen alemman insino¤o¤ritutkinnon (ingeniero te·cnico) suorittaneiden urallaetenemisvaatimukset muihin verrattuna Katsooko komissio, etta¤ brittila¤iset Bachelor of Arts, Bachelor of Science ja Bachelor of Engineering -tutkinnot takaavat korkeamman ammattitaidon kuin ingeniero te·cnico -tutkinto? Miksi?


title: 98/198/CE: Décision du Conseil du 9 mars 1998 autorisant le Royaume-Uni à proroger l'application d'une mesure dérogatoire aux articles 6 et 17 de la sixième directive (77/388/CEE) en matière d'harmonisation des législations des États membres relatives aux taxes sur le chiffre d'affaires

eurovoc_concepts:
United Kingdom
VAT
derogation from EU law
hire purchase
tax relief
vehicle rental

text: 13. 3. 98 FR Journal officiel des Communaut(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes L 76/31 II (Actes dont la publication n’est pas une condition de leur applicabilit(cid:130)) CONSEIL D(cid:144)CISION DU CONSEIL du 9 mars 1998 autorisant le Royaume-Uni (cid:133) proroger l’application d’une mesure d(cid:130)rogatoire aux articles 6 et 17 de la sixi(cid:138)me directive (77/388/CEE) en mati(cid:138)re d’harmonisation des l(cid:130)gislations des (cid:144)tats membres relatives aux taxes sur le chiffre d’affaires (98/198/CE) LE CONSEIL DE L’UNION EUROP(cid:144)ENNE, vu le trait(cid:130) instituant la Communaut(cid:130) europ(cid:130)enne, vu la sixi(cid:138)me directive 77/388/CEE du Conseil du 17 mai 1977 en mati(cid:138)re d’harmonisation des l(cid:130)gislations des (cid:144)tats membres relatives aux taxes sur le chiffre d’af- faires (cid:190) Syst(cid:138)me commun de taxe sur la valeur ajout(cid:130)e: assiette uniforme (1), et notamment son article 27, vu la pr(cid:130)c(cid:130)dente d(cid:130)cision no 95/252/CE (2), vu la proposition de la Commission, consid(cid:130)rant que, aux termes de l’article 27, paragraphe 1, de la directive 77/388/CEE, le Conseil, statuant (cid:133) l’unani- mit(cid:130) sur proposition de la Commission, peut autoriser tout (cid:144)tat membre (cid:133) introduire ou proroger des mesures particuli(cid:138)res d(cid:130)rogatoires (cid:133) ladite directive, afin de simpli- fier la perception de la taxe ou d’(cid:130)viter certaines fraudes ou (cid:130)vasions fiscales; consid(cid:130)rant que, par lettre enregistr(cid:130)e (cid:133) la Commission le 6 octobre 1997, le Royaume-Uni a demand(cid:130) l’autorisation de proroger l’application de la mesure d(cid:130)rogatoire qui lui a (cid:130)t(cid:130) pr(cid:130)c(cid:130)demment accord(cid:130)e par la d(cid:130)cision 95/252/CE du Conseil du 29 juin 1995; consid(cid:130)rant que les autres (cid:144)tats membres ont (cid:130)t(cid:130) inform(cid:130)s le 23 octobre 1997 de la demande du Royaume-Uni; (1) JO L 145 du 13. 6. 1977, p. 1. Directive modifi(cid:130)e en dernier lieu par la directive 96/95/CE (JO L 338 du 28. 12. 1996, p. 89). (2) JO L 159 du 11. 7. 1995, p. 19. consid(cid:130)rant que le Royaume-Uni a (cid:130)t(cid:130) autoris(cid:130), par la d(cid:130)cision 95/252/CE, (cid:133) appliquer jusqu’au 31 d(cid:130)cembre 1997, une mesure d(cid:130)rogatoire aux articles 6 et 17 de la directive 77/388/CEE; consid(cid:130)rant que ladite mesure d(cid:130)rogatoire vise, d’une part, (cid:133) exclure 50 % de la taxe sur la valeur ajout(cid:130)e (TVA) grevant les op(cid:130)rations de location ou de leasing d’une voiture de tourisme, du droit (cid:133) d(cid:130)duction du locataire ou du preneur du leasing, lorsque la voiture est utilis(cid:130)e (cid:133) des fins priv(cid:130)es et, d’autre part, (cid:133) ne pas percevoir la TVA due sur l’utilisation (cid:133) des fins priv(cid:130)es de la voiture en ques- tion; consid(cid:130)rant que l’objectif de cette restriction du droit (cid:133) d(cid:130)duction est de taxer d’une mani(cid:138)re forfaitaire l’utilisa- tion priv(cid:130)e des voitures prises en location ou en leasing par des assujettis; consid(cid:130)rant que la mesure, en r(cid:130)duisant les obligations administratives des op(cid:130)rateurs, qui ne doivent pas tenir une comptabilit(cid:130) permettant d’(cid:130)tablir le kilom(cid:130)trage effectu(cid:130) (cid:133) des fins priv(cid:130)es, constitue bien une simplifica- tion de la perception de la taxe au sens de l’article 27 de la directive 77/388/CEE; consid(cid:130)rant que la Commission a adopt(cid:130) le 10 juillet 1996 un programme de travail accompagn(cid:130) d’un calen- drier de propositions pr(cid:130)voyant une avanc(cid:130)e progressive et par (cid:130)tapes vers un syst(cid:138)me commun de TVA pour le march(cid:130) int(cid:130)rieur; L 76/32 FR Journal officiel des Communaut(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes 13. 3. 98 consid(cid:130)rant que l’autorisation est accord(cid:130)e jusqu’au 31 d(cid:130)cembre 1998, permettant ainsi d’(cid:130)valuer alors l’oppor- tunit(cid:130) de la mesure d(cid:130)rogatoire compte tenu de l’ap- proche communautaire en mati(cid:138)re des limitations du droit (cid:133) d(cid:130)duction de TVA grevant certaines d(cid:130)penses qui sera retenue dans le cadre de ce programme; consid(cid:130)rant que la mesure d(cid:130)rogatoire n’a pas d’inci- dences n(cid:130)gatives sur les ressources propres de la Commu- naut(cid:130) provenant de la taxe sur la valeur ajout(cid:130)e, Article 2 Par d(cid:130)rogation (cid:133) l’article 6, paragraphe 2, point a), de la directive 77/388/CEE, le Royaume-Uni est autoris(cid:130) (cid:133) ne pas assimiler (cid:133) des prestations de services effectu(cid:130)es (cid:133) titre l’utilisation pour des besoins priv(cid:130)s, d’une on(cid:130)reux, voiture affect(cid:130)e (cid:133) l’entreprise, qu’un assujetti a pris en location ou en leasing. Article 3 La pr(cid:130)sente autorisation expire le 31 d(cid:130)cembre 1998. A ARR(cid:219)T(cid:144) LA PR(cid:144)SENTE D(cid:144)CISION: Article 4 Article premier Le Royaume-Uni est destinataire de la pr(cid:130)sente d(cid:130)cision. Par d(cid:130)rogation (cid:133) l’article 17, paragraphes 2 et 3, de la directive 77/388/CEE, le Royaume-Uni est autoris(cid:130) (cid:133) exclure 50 % de la taxe sur la valeur ajout(cid:130)e grevant les d(cid:130)penses de location ou de leasing d’une voiture de tourisme, du droit (cid:133) d(cid:130)duction du locataire ou du preneur du leasing, lorsque cette voiture est utilis(cid:130)e (cid:133) des fins priv(cid:130)es. Fait (cid:133) Bruxelles, le 9 mars 1998. Par le Conseil Le pr(cid:130)sident G. BROWN


title: 98/214/EG: Kommissionens beslut av den 9 mars 1998 om förfarandet för bestyrkande av överensstämmelse av byggprodukter enligt artikel 20.2 i rådets direktiv 89/106/EEG beträffande metallprodukter för konstruktionsändamål med tillbehör (Text av betydelse för EES)

eurovoc_concepts:
Community certification
building materials
construction equipment
metal structure
product safety
quality control of industrial products
quality label

text: L 80/46 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 18. 3. 98 KOMMISSIONENS BESLUT av den 9 mars 1998 om f(cid:148)rfarandet f(cid:148)r bestyrkande av (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)mmelse av byggprodukter enligt artikel 20. 2 i r(cid:134)dets direktiv 89/106/EEG betr(cid:132)ffande metallprodukter f(cid:148)r konstruktions(cid:132)ndam(cid:134)l med tillbeh(cid:148)r (Text av betydelse f(cid:148)r EES) (98/214/EG) EUROPEISKA GEMENSKAPERNAS KOMMISSION HAR BESLUTAT F(cid:153)LJANDE med beaktande av F(cid:148)rdraget om uppr(cid:132)ttandet av Euro- peiska gemenskapen, med beaktande av r(cid:134)dets direktiv 89/106/EEG av den 21 december 1988 om tilln(cid:132)rmning av medlemsstaternas lagar och andra f(cid:148)rfattningar om byggprodukter (1), (cid:132)ndrat genom direktiv 93/68/EEG (2), s(cid:132)rskilt artikel 13. 4 i detta, och med beaktande av f(cid:148)ljande: Kommissionen skall v(cid:132)lja det av de tv(cid:134) f(cid:148)rfaranden enligt artikel 13. 3 i direktiv 89/106/EEG f(cid:148)r bestyrkande av (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)mmelse av en produkt, som (cid:132)r ”minst betung- ande och samtidigt f(cid:148)renligt med kraven p(cid:134) s(cid:132)kerhet”. Detta inneb(cid:132)r att det (cid:132)r n(cid:148)dv(cid:132)ndigt att besluta huruvida en tillverkningskontroll fabriken under tillverkarens ansvar (cid:132)r n(cid:148)dv(cid:132)ndigt och tillr(cid:132)ckligt f(cid:148)r bestyrkande av (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)mmelse f(cid:148)r en best(cid:132)md produkt eller produkt- grupp, eller om det av orsaker som r(cid:148)r uppfyllandet av de kriterier som avses i artikel 13. 4 kr(cid:132)vs att ett godk(cid:132)nt certifieringsorgan deltar. i Enligt artikel 13. 4 kr(cid:132)vs att det f(cid:148)rfarande som s(cid:134)lunda best(cid:132)mts anges i uppdragen och i de tekniska specifika- tionerna. Det (cid:132)r d(cid:132)rf(cid:148)r (cid:148)nskv(cid:132)rt att definiera de produkter eller produktgrupper som anv(cid:132)nds i uppdragen och i de tekniska specifikationerna. De tv(cid:134) f(cid:148)rfarandena i artikel 13. 3 beskrivs i detalj i bilaga III till direktiv 89/106/EEG. Det (cid:132)r d(cid:132)rf(cid:148)r n(cid:148)dv(cid:132)ndigt att, i enlighet med bilaga III, klart specificera de metoder med vilka de tv(cid:134) f(cid:148)rfarandena skall genomf(cid:148)ras f(cid:148)r varje produkt eller produktgrupp, eftersom bilaga III anger att vissa system i f(cid:148)rsta hand skall anv(cid:132)ndas. Det f(cid:148)rfarande som avses i artikel 13. 3 a motsvarar de system som anges i det f(cid:148)rsta alternativet utan fortl(cid:148)pande (cid:148)vervakning, samt i det andra och det tredje alternativen i punkt 2 ii i bilaga III, och det f(cid:148)rfarande som avses i artikel 13. 3 b motsvarar de system som anges i punkt 2 i i bilaga III samt i det f(cid:148)rsta alternativet med fortl(cid:148)pande (cid:148)vervakning i punkt 2 ii i bilaga III. De (cid:134)tg(cid:132)rder som f(cid:148)reskrivs i detta beslut (cid:132)r f(cid:148)renliga med yttrandet fr(cid:134)n St(cid:132)ndiga byggkommitt(cid:130)n. H(cid:142)RIGENOM F(cid:153)RESKRIVS F(cid:153)LJANDE. Artikel 1 F(cid:148)r de produkter som anges i bilaga I skall (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)m- melsen bestyrkas genom ett f(cid:148)rfarande d(cid:132)r, f(cid:148)rutom ett tillverkningskontrollsystem i fabriken som sk(cid:148)ts av tillver- karen, (cid:132)ven ett godk(cid:132)nt certifieringsorgan deltar vid bed(cid:148)mningen och (cid:148)vervakningen av tillverkningskon- trollen eller av sj(cid:132)lva produkten. Artikel 2 F(cid:148)rfarandet f(cid:148)r bestyrkande av (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)mmelse enligt bilaga II skall anges i uppdragen f(cid:148)r harmoniserade stan- darder. Artikel 3 Detta beslut riktar sig till medlemsstaterna. Utf(cid:132)rdat i Bryssel den 9 mars 1998. P(cid:134) kommissionens v(cid:132)gnar Martin BANGEMANN Ledamot av kommissionen (1) EGT L 40, 11. 2. 1989, s. 12. (2) EGT L 220, 30. 8. 1993, s. 1. 18. 3. 98 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning L 80/47 BILAGA I Metallprofiler f(cid:148)r konstruktions(cid:132)ndam(cid:134)l Varmvalsade, kallformade eller p(cid:134) annat s(cid:132)tt framst(cid:132)llda profiler med olika form (T-, L-, H-, U-, Z-, I-sektion, fyrkantsr(cid:148)r och cirkul(cid:132)ra r(cid:148)r, pl(cid:134)tprodukter (grovpl(cid:134)t, tunnpl(cid:134)t, bandst(cid:134)l), st(cid:132)nger, gjutgods, smide av olika metallmaterial, med eller utan korrosionsskyddande bel(cid:132)ggning. Konstruktionselement av metall F(cid:132)rdiga produkter av metall, t. ex. ramar f(cid:148)r undertak (tunga), fackverk, balkar, pelare, trappor, grundp(cid:134)lar, st(cid:148)dp(cid:134)lar, spont, sektioner tillverkade f(cid:148)r s(cid:132)rskilda till(cid:132)mpningar samt r(cid:132)ls och syll. De kan vara med eller utan korrosionsskyddande bel(cid:132)ggning, svetsade eller ej. Svetsmaterial F(cid:132)stelement Metallnitar, skruvar (muttrar och brickor), h(cid:148)gh(cid:134)llfasta skruvar f(cid:148)r friktionsf(cid:148)rband, pinnbultar, f(cid:132)stdon f(cid:148)r r(cid:132)ls. L 80/48 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 18. 3. 98 BILAGA II PRODUKTFAMILJ METALLPRODUKTER F(cid:153)R KONSTRUKTIONS(cid:142)NDAM(cid:143)L MED TILLBEH(cid:153)R (1/4) 1. System f(cid:148)r bestyrkande av (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)mmelse F(cid:148)r den eller de produkter och det eller de anv(cid:132)ndningsomr(cid:134)den som anges nedan skall CEN/CENELEC specificera f(cid:148)ljande system f(cid:148)r bestyrkande av (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)mmelse i de harmoniserade standarder som (cid:132)r till(cid:132)mpliga: Produkt(er) Anv(cid:132)ndning Niv(cid:134)/er eller klass/er (reaktion vid brandp(cid:134)verkan) System f(cid:148)r bestyrkande av (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)mmelse Metallprofiler f(cid:148)r konstruktions(cid:132)ndam(cid:134)l: Varmvalsade, kallformade eller p(cid:134) annat s(cid:132)tt framst(cid:132)llda profiler med olika form (T-, L-, H-, U-, Z-, I-sektion, fyrkantsr(cid:148)r och cirkul(cid:132)ra (grovpl(cid:134)t, tunnpl(cid:134)t, bandst(cid:134)l), st(cid:132)nger, gjutgods, smide av olika metallmaterial, med eller utan korrosionsskyddande bel(cid:132)ggning. pl(cid:134)tprodukter r(cid:148)r), metallkonstruktioner eller sammansatta kon- av metall struktioner och betong 2+ (1) (1) System 2+: Se bilaga III. 2 ii inbegripet certifiering av fabrikens egen f(cid:148)rsta alternativet, tillverkningskontroll av ett godk(cid:132)nt organ p(cid:134) grundval av organets fortl(cid:148)pande (cid:148)vervakning, bed(cid:148)mning och godk(cid:132)nnande. i direktiv 89/106/EEG, 2. Villkor som CEN skall till(cid:132)mpa betr(cid:132)ffande specificering av system f(cid:148)r bestyrkande av (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)mmelse Specifikationen f(cid:148)r systemet skall vara s(cid:134)dan att det kan genomf(cid:148)ras (cid:132)ven n(cid:132)r prestanda betr(cid:132)ffande en viss egenskap inte beh(cid:148)ver fastst(cid:132)llas p(cid:134) grund av att minst en medlemsstat saknar best(cid:132)mmelser f(cid:148)r egenskapen i fr(cid:134)ga (se artikel 2. 1 i direktiv 89/106/EEG och i till(cid:132)mpliga fall klausul 1. 2. 3 i till(cid:132)mpningsdokumenten). I dessa fall skall kontroll av egenskapen i fr(cid:134)ga inte p(cid:134)tvingas tillverkaren om denne inte (cid:148)nskar ange produktens prestanda i detta avseende. PRODUKTFAMILJ METALLPRODUKTER F(cid:153)R KONSTRUKTIONS(cid:142)NDAM(cid:143)L MED TILLBEH(cid:153)R (2/4) 1. System f(cid:148)r bestyrkande av (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)mmelse F(cid:148)r den eller de produkter och det eller de anv(cid:132)ndningsomr(cid:134)den som anges nedan skall CEN/CENELEC specificera f(cid:148)ljande system f(cid:148)r bestyrkande av (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)mmelse i de harmoniserade standarder som (cid:132)r till(cid:132)mpliga: 18. 3. 98 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning L 80/49 Produkt(er) Anv(cid:132)ndning Niv(cid:134)/er eller klass/er (reaktion vid brandp(cid:134)verkan) System f(cid:148)r bestyrkande (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)mmelse Konstruktionselement av metall: F(cid:132)rdiga produkter av metall, t. ex. fackverk, balkar, grundp(cid:134)lar, st(cid:148)dp(cid:134)lar, spont, sektioner tillverkade f(cid:148)r s(cid:132)rskilda till(cid:132)mpningar samt r(cid:132)ls och syll. trappor, pelare, byggnadsstomar grundkonstruktioner och (cid:190) 2+ (1) De kan vara med eller utan korrosionsskyd- dande bel(cid:132)ggning, svetsade eller ej. B(cid:132)rande byggdelar av metall: F(cid:132)rdiga ramar f(cid:148)r undertak (tunga). i byggnadsstomar (A, B, C) (2) 1 (3) De kan vara med eller utan korrosionsskyd- dande bel(cid:132)ggning, svetsade eller ej. (A, B, C) (4), D, E, F, A (5) 2+ (1) (1) System 2+: Se bilaga III. 2 ii inbegripet certifiering av fabrikens egen f(cid:148)rsta alternativet, tillverkningskontroll av ett godk(cid:132)nt organ p(cid:134) grundval av organets fortl(cid:148)pande (cid:148)vervakning, bed(cid:148)mning och godk(cid:132)nnande. i direktiv 89/106/EEG, (2) Material, vars brandtekniska materialegenskaper f(cid:148)r(cid:132)ndras under tillverkningsprocessen (i allm(cid:132)nhet s(cid:134)dana som kan genomg(cid:134) kemiska f(cid:148)r(cid:132)ndringar, som t. ex. flamskyddsmedel, eller hos vilka f(cid:148)r(cid:132)ndringar av sammans(cid:132)ttningen kan leda till (cid:132)ndrade brandtekniska materialegenskaper). (3) System 1: Se bilaga III. 2 i till direktiv 89/106/EEG utan revisonsprovning av stickprov (4) Material, vars brandtekniska materialegenskaper inte f(cid:148)r(cid:132)ndras under tillverkningsprocessen. (5) Material i klass A som inte beh(cid:148)ver genomg(cid:134) brandteknisk provning i enlighet med beslut 96/603/EG. 2. Villkor som CEN skall till(cid:132)mpa betr(cid:132)ffande specificering av system f(cid:148)r bestyrkande av (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)mmelse Specifikationen f(cid:148)r systemet skall vara s(cid:134)dan att det kan genomf(cid:148)ras (cid:132)ven n(cid:132)r prestanda betr(cid:132)ffande en viss egenskap inte beh(cid:148)ver fastst(cid:132)llas p(cid:134) grund av att minst en medlemsstat saknar best(cid:132)mmelser f(cid:148)r egenskapen i fr(cid:134)ga (se artikel 2. 1 i direktiv 89/106/EEG och i till(cid:132)mpliga fall klausul 1. 2. 3 i till(cid:132)mpningsdokumenten). I dessa fall skall kontroll av egenskapen i fr(cid:134)ga inte p(cid:134)tvingas tillverkaren om denne inte (cid:148)nskar ange produktens prestanda i detta avseende. PRODUKTFAMILJ METALLPRODUKTER F(cid:153)R KONSTRUKTIONS(cid:142)NDAM(cid:143)L MED TILLBEH(cid:153)R (3/4) 1. System f(cid:148)r bestyrkande av (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)mmelse F(cid:148)r den eller de produkter och det eller de anv(cid:132)ndningsomr(cid:134)den som anges nedan skall CEN/CENELEC specificera f(cid:148)ljande system f(cid:148)r bestyrkande av (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)mmelse i de harmoniserade standarder som (cid:132)r till(cid:132)mpliga: L 80/50 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 18. 3. 98 Produkt(er) Anv(cid:132)ndning Niv(cid:134)/er eller klass/er (reaktion vid brandp(cid:134)verkan) System f(cid:148)r bestyrkande av (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)mmelse Svetsmaterial i metallkonstruktioner 2+ (1) (1) System 2+: Se bilaga III. 2 ii inbegripet certifiering av fabrikens egen f(cid:148)rsta alternativet, tillverkningskontroll av ett godk(cid:132)nt organ p(cid:134) grundval av organets fortl(cid:148)pande (cid:148)vervakning, bed(cid:148)mning och godk(cid:132)nnande. i direktiv 89/106/EEG, 2. Villkor som CEN skall till(cid:132)mpa betr(cid:132)ffande specificering av system f(cid:148)r bestyrkande av (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)mmelse Specifikationen f(cid:148)r systemet skall vara s(cid:134)dan att det kan genomf(cid:148)ras (cid:132)ven n(cid:132)r prestanda betr(cid:132)ffande en viss egenskap inte beh(cid:148)ver fastst(cid:132)llas p(cid:134) grund av att minst en medlemsstat saknar best(cid:132)mmelser f(cid:148)r egenskapen i fr(cid:134)ga (se artikel 2. 1 i direktiv 89/106/EEG och i till(cid:132)mpliga fall klausul 1. 2. 3 i till(cid:132)mpningsdokumenten). I dessa fall skall kontroll av egenskapen i fr(cid:134)ga inte p(cid:134)tvingas tillverkaren om denne inte (cid:148)nskar ange produktens prestanda i detta avseende. PRODUKTFAMILJ METALLPRODUKTER F(cid:153)R KONSTRUKTIONS(cid:142)NDAM(cid:143)L MED TILLBEH(cid:153)R (4/4) 1. System f(cid:148)r bestyrkande av (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)mmelse F(cid:148)r den eller de produkter och det eller de anv(cid:132)ndningsomr(cid:134)den som anges nedan skall CEN/CENELEC specificera f(cid:148)ljande system f(cid:148)r bestyrkande av (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)mmelse i de harmoniserade standarder som (cid:132)r till(cid:132)mpliga: Produkt(er) Anv(cid:132)ndning Niv(cid:134)/er eller klass/er (reaktion vid brandp(cid:134)verkan) System f(cid:148)r bestyrkande av (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)mmelse F(cid:132)stelement: Metallnitar, skruvar (muttrar och brickor), h(cid:148)gh(cid:134)llfasta skruvar f(cid:148)r friktionsf(cid:148)rband, pinnbultar, f(cid:132)stdon f(cid:148)r r(cid:132)ls i metallkonstruktioner 2+ (1) (1) System 2+: Se bilaga 3. 2 ii inbegripet certifiering av fabrikens egen f(cid:148)rsta alternativet, tillverkningskontroll av ett godk(cid:132)nt organ p(cid:134) grundval av organets fortl(cid:148)pande (cid:148)vervakning, bed(cid:148)mning och godk(cid:132)nnande. i direktiv 89/106/EEG, 2. Villkor som CEN skall till(cid:132)mpa betr(cid:132)ffande specificering av system f(cid:148)r bestyrkande av (cid:148)verensst(cid:132)mmelse Specifikationen f(cid:148)r systemet skall vara s(cid:134)dan att det kan genomf(cid:148)ras (cid:132)ven n(cid:132)r prestanda betr(cid:132)ffande en viss egenskap inte beh(cid:148)ver fastst(cid:132)llas p(cid:134) grund av att minst en medlemsstat saknar best(cid:132)mmelser f(cid:148)r egenskapen i fr(cid:134)ga (se artikel 2. 1 i direktiv 89/106/EEG och i till(cid:132)mpliga fall klausul 1. 2. 3 i till(cid:132)mpningsdokumenten). I dessa fall skall kontroll av egenskapen i fr(cid:134)ga inte p(cid:134)tvingas tillverkaren om denne inte (cid:148)nskar ange produktens prestanda i detta avseende