title: 98/271/EF: Kommissionens beslutning af 22. april 1998 om tredje ændring af beslutning 97/285/EF om beskyttelsesforanstaltninger mod klassisk svinepest i Spanien (EØS-relevant tekst)

eurovoc_concepts:
Spain
animal plague
swine
veterinary inspection

text: 23. 4. 98 ‹ ‹DA De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende L 120/23 II (Retsakter hvis offentliggørelse ikke er obligatorisk) KOMMISSIONEN KOMMISSIONENS BESLUTNING af 22. april 1998 om tredje ændring af beslutning 97/285/EF om beskyttelsesforanstaltninger mod klassisk svinepest i Spanien (EØS-relevant tekst) (98/271/EF) KOMMISSIONEN FOR DE EUROPÆISKE FÆLLESSKABER HAR — som følge af sygdomssituationen vedtog Kommissionen beslutning 97/285/EF af 30. april 1997 om beskyttelses- foranstaltninger mod klassisk svinepest i Spanien (4); under henvisning til Europæiske Fællesskab, traktaten om oprettelse af Det under henvisning til R(cid:134)dets direktiv 90/425/EØF af 26. juni 1990 om veterinærkontrol og zooteknisk kontrol i samhandelen med visse levende dyr og produkter inden for Fællesskabet med henblik p(cid:134) gennemførelse af det indre marked (1), senest ændret ved direktiv 92/118/ EØF (2), særlig artikel 10, stk. 4, og ud fra følgende betragtninger: Der er forekommet udbrud af klassisk svinepest i Spanien; p(cid:134) grund af handelen med levende svin, sæd, embryoner og æg kan udbruddene udgøre en fare for andre medlemsstaters bestande; Spanien har truffet foranstaltninger inden for rammerne af R(cid:134)dets direktiv 80/217/EØF af 22. januar 1980 om fællesskabsforanstaltninger til kontrol med klassisk svine- pest (3), senest ændret ved akten vedrørende Østrigs, Finlands og Sveriges tiltrædelse; som følge af sygdomsudviklingen vedtog Kommissionens beslutning 97/446/EF (5) og beslutning 98/93/EF (6) om ændring af beslutning 97/285/EF; Spanien har iværksat det nationale serooverv(cid:134)gningspro- gram for klassisk svinepest, som blev vedtaget ved Kommissionens beslutning 98/176/EF (7); p(cid:134) baggrund af sygdomsudviklingen bør de foranstaltnin- ger, der blev indført ved beslutning 97/285/EF, ændres for tredje gang; under iværksættelsen af det nationale serooverv(cid:134)gnings- program blev der ikke fundet nogen antistoffer mod klas- sisk svinepestvirus hos svin i provinserne Segovia, Madrid og Toledo; derfor bør avls- og brugssvin kunne sendes fra disse provinser til den øvrige del af Spanien, hvis der gennemføres foranstaltninger til at forebygge spredning af sygdommen; de i denne beslutning fastsatte foranstaltninger er i over- ensstemmelse med udtalelse fra Den St(cid:134)ende Veterinær- komit(cid:130) — (1) EFT L 224 af 18. 8. 1990, s. 29. (2) EFT L 62 af 15. 3. 1993, s. 49. (3) EFT L 47 af 21. 2. 1980, s. 11. (4) EFT L 114 af 1. 5. 1997, s. 47. (5) EFT L 190 af 19. 7. 1997, s. 48. (6) EFT L 18 af 23. 1. 1998, s. 35. (7) EFT L 65 af 5. 3. 1998, s. 26. L 120/24 ‹ ‹DA De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende 23. 4. 98 VEDTAGET FØLGENDE BESLUTNING: Artikel 1 I beslutning 97/285/EF foretages følgende ændringer: 1) I artikel 1 indsættes som stk. 5: »5. Uanset stk. 4 m(cid:134) Spanien ikke sende avls- og brugssvin fra de omr(cid:134)der, der er nævnt i bilag II, til andre dele af Spanien, medmindre: a) svinene kommer fra en afsendelsesbedrift, hvor — de har været holdt i mindst 30 dage eller siden fødslen, hvis de er under 30 dage gamle — der i henhold til bilag IV til direktiv 80/217/ EØF er blevet ført serologisk kontrol for klassisk svinepest med negativt resultat inden for de sidste 30 dage før afsendelsen — embedsdyrlægen inden for det sidste døgn før afsendelsen har tilset alle svin p(cid:134) bedriften og foretaget en klinisk undersøgelse af de svin, der skal flyttes, og i den forbindelse taget tempe- ratur p(cid:134) en vis andel af dem b) hvert enkelt svin er forsynet med et øremærke, der identificere afsendelsesbe- giver mulighed for at driften samme periode, medmindre de sendes direkte til slagtning. « 2) I artikel 5, stk. 1, ændres »bilag II« til »bilag III«. 3) Bilag I affattes som angivet i bilag I og bilag II til denne beslutning. 4) Bilag II bliver bilag III. Artikel 2 Medlemsstaterne ændrer deres handelsforanstaltninger for at bringe dem i overensstemmelse med denne beslutning. De underretter straks Kommissionen herom. Artikel 3 Denne beslutning er rettet til medlemsstaterne. Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 22. april 1998. c) svinene transporteres afsendelses- bedriften til bestemmelsesbedriften i officielt plom- berede køretøjer direkte fra d) svinene forbliver p(cid:134) bestemmelsesbedriften i mindst i 30 dage og ingen svin forlader denne bedrift P(cid:134) Kommissionens vegne Franz FISCHLER Medlem af Kommissionen 23. 4. 98 ‹ ‹DA De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende L 120/25 BILAG I Comarcas i provinsen Lerida Pla d’Urgell Urgell Noguera Segri(cid:133) Garrigues Segarra Comarcas veterinarias i provinsen Segovia Cu(cid:130)llar Carbonero el Mayor Cantalejo Santa Mar(cid:146)a la Real de Nieva Sep ´ulveda S(cid:130)govia Comarcas veterinarias i regionen Madrid Madrid Parla Aranjuez Navalcarnero Colmenar Viejo Buitrago Comarcas veterinarias i provinsen Toledo Toledo Yuncos Torrijos L 120/26 ‹ ‹DA De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende 23. 4. 98 BILAG II Comarcas veterinarias i provinsen Segovia Cu(cid:130)llar Carbonero el Mayor Cantalejo Santa Mar(cid:146)a la Real de Nieva Sep ´ulveda Segovia Comarcas veterinarias i regionen Madrid Madrid Parla Aranjuez Navalcarnero Colmenar Viejo Buitrago Comarcas veterinarias i provinsen Toledo Toledo Yuncos Torrijos


title: 1999/157/EC: Commission Decision of 22 April 1998 on State aid for Triptis Porzellan GmbH (in liquidation), Thuringia (notified under document number C(1998) 1324) (Only the German text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance)

eurovoc_concepts:
Germany
State aid
Thuringia
aid to undertakings
ceramics
redemption

formats: html pdf print

text: L 52/48 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 27. 2. 1999 II (Acts whose publication is not obligatory) COMMISSION COMMISSION DECISION of 22 April 1998 on State aid for Triptis Porzellan GmbH (in liquidation), Thuringia (notified under document number C(1998) 1324) (Only the German text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (1999/157/EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 93(2) thereof, Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular Article 62(1)(a) thereof, Having given the parties concerned the opportunity to submit their comments, in accordance with the aforemen- tioned Articles, Having regard to the comments received, Whereas: I By letter dated 30 May 1997 the Commission informed the German Government of its decision to initiate Article 92(3) proceedings against aid for Triptis Porzellan GmbH, Thuringia and requested it to submit its comments. referred to as (hereinafter ‘Triptis'), The other Member States and interested parties were informed of the opening of proceedings and were invited to submit their comments, by way of a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Communities (1). (1) OJ C 250, 15. 8. 1997, p. 3. Germany gave its comments by letter dated 11 July (regis- tered the same day). The Commission requested further information in its letters dated 28 July and 5 August, to which the German Government replied by letters dated 29 August (registered on 12 September) and 8 September (registered on 9 September). The case was discussed with the German authorities on 18 and 19 September in Berlin. By letter dated 15 September 1997, the Commission received comments from a Spanish competitor. The trans- lation of these comments was transmitted to Germany by letter dated 27 October. Germany replied to them by letter dated 1 December (registered on 2 December 1997). II Triptis Porzellan GmbH, Thuringia (‘Triptis'), a German porcelain manufacturer, was founded in 1891 under the name Unger & Gretschel. The enterprise was located in the eastern Land of Thuringia. In the former GDR, the State-owned VEB Porzellanwerk the fine ceramics Triptis porcelain formed part of conglomerate Kahla (Kombinat Feinkeramik Kahla). It had neither its own trade mark, nor its own distribution system. On 1 July 1990, when the THA (Treuhandanstalt) took over the VEB Porzellanwerk Triptis, there were about 900 employees. 27. 2. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 52/49 The restructuring of Triptis started with the firm’s privati- sation in September 1993. When opening proceedings, the Commission expressed doubts as to the procedure followed for privatisation. In the context of privatisation the company received extensive aid (totalling DEM 34,7 million in loans relin- it covered by the Treuhandregime, a quished), all of scheme approved by the Commission (1). After privatisa- tion the enterprise not only had to be rebuilt, but because of the disappearance of the East European markets had also to develop a selling and distribution system in new the markets. Therefore immediately after privatisation, enterprise made a difficult operational start and acquired high liabilities. In early 1995 the management realised that the restruc- turing of the enterprise could not be carried out success- fully with its own financial resources. The Bundesanstalt vereinigungsbedingter Sonderaufgaben (BvS) was there- fore asked for financial support. The aid took the form of a loan of DEM 8 million (plus interest) which was granted by the BvS under a ‘concerted action'. Repayment of this loan was later waived. The Commission was notified of this loan at the time when repayment was waived. All the parties involved (investors, workers, BvS) made efforts to rescue the company. In this context the Hessische Land- esbank (HeLaBa) waived repayment of DEM 10 million of a larger debt package. On 30 April 1997 the Commission decided to initiate Article 93(2) proceedings against the State aid granted to Triptis. The Commission concluded that the BvS loan of DEM 8 million (plus interest) constituted aid of which the Commission should have been notified at the time it was granted, pursuant to Article 93(3) of the Treaty. There was also the question of whether HeLaBa’s waiving of the repayment of DEM 10 million constituted ‘aid' within the meaning of Article 92(1) of the EC Treaty. The two particular reasons for which the proceedings were opened were: (1) as the Hessische Landesbank is State-owned, the Commission expressed doubts as to whether it had really acted as a private banker in waiving repayment of the loan. For this reason, there was still uncertainty as regards the exact amount of the aid granted. This problem was to be settled within the proceedings; (1) E15/92 (not published): of the total DEM 34,71 million in waived loans, DEM 19,26 million was intended to safeguard liquidity, DEM 7,25 million was for investment purposes and DEM 8,2 million to cover losses. As the company did not reach the thresholds laid down by the Treuhandregime of 1 500 employees and DEM 150 million in financial liabilities, individual notification was not necessary. (2) Triptis produced in a market which suffers from severe overcapacity. Under the overall restructuring process the company was reducing its capacity by 50 %, but there were no plans for further capacity reduction in relation to the new aid. In view of the severe overcapacity in the porcelain sector, it could be argued that the aid to Triptis distorted competition unduly and damaged competitors that received no aid. In other cases in the same sector, competitors have objected to possible aid. This led to serious doubts as to whether the aid was compatible with the derogations laid down in Article 92(3)(a) and (c) of the EC Treaty, and in particular with the ‘Community Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty' (2). The Commission at no point expressed doubts concerning the viability of the company. III It was only by letter dated 11 July 1997 that Germany informed the Commission that the special insolvency proceedings for enterprises in the new L(cid:132)nder (Gesamt- vollstreckungsverfahren) had been commenced on 30 April 1997. By its own account, the German Government did not learn of these proceedings until July. For this reason, Germany also intended to withdraw the noti- fication of the aid. By letter dated 28 July 1997, the German authorities were informed that it was not possible to withdraw the noti- fication, because the aid had been granted before its noti- fication in July and September 1996 and the Article 93(2) proceedings with regard to these aid measures had already been initiated. Germany was also told that the Commis- sion had based its assessment on the date on which aid had been granted and that therefore the fact that the aid insolvency proceedings had been listed in the special made no difference. The information submitted on 8 September 1997 shows that the DEM 10 million loan, repayment of which was waived by HeLaBa under the concerted action, was secured by a 90 % guarantee from Thuringia. This guar- antee had not been notified and must therefore be regarded as unlawful. After HeLaBa had waived the loan, it invoked the Thuringian guarantee, and as a result was paid 90 % of the original loan amount (DEM 9 million). Since both the repayment waiver and the guarantee payment had taken place as far back as 1996, neither HeLaBa nor Thuringia laid claim to the loan or the guarantee as part of the special insolvency proceedings. (2) OJ C 368, 23. 12. 1994, p. 12. L 52/50 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 27. 2. 1999 In addition, in 1993 and 1994 Thuringia had taken on guarantees in relation to HeLaBa (to secure 90 % of the total loan amount) for loans totalling DEM 26,75 million, without notifying the Commission thereof. These guaran- tees were awarded by the Thuringian Ministry of Finance in the course of the privatisation, and related to invest- ment credits of DEM 14,75 million and DEM 5 million and guarantees for operating funds of DEM 7 million. This amount already includes the 90 % guarantee for the DEM 10 million loan which was waived in 1996. Since Thuringia had already paid out this guarantee (totalling DEM 9 million) to HeLaBa, this amount must also be taken into account in the assessment of aid. HeLaBa laid claim to the remaining loans, totalling DEM 16,75 million, under the special insolvency proceedings, but it is unlikely that much of this amount will be settled within this procedure. Consequently it is virtually certain that the corresponding guarantees will be used for payment. Therefore the assessment takes into account the total amount of the unlawfully granted guarantees, rep- resenting an aid amount of DEM 24,075 million. By letter dated 1 December 1997 with which the German authorities reacted to the initiation of proceedings, they submitted the information that as part of the special insolvency proceedings the BvS had given notice of a DEM 8,75 million penalty for employment guarantees, a DEM 2,685 million penalty for inability to demonstrate proper application of reserve funds and the loan amount of DEM 8 million (plus interest), repayment of which was waived in the concerted action. IV After the Triptis insolvency, the receiver tried to find a buyer to whom the fixed assets of the company could be sold as part of a second privatisation so that the company would continue in operation (Auffangl(cid:148)sung). The company was offered to various porcelain manufacturers in Germany and Europe, and outside Europe, and the Treuhandanstalt (THA) received 13 bids. The contract was concluded with the investor who submitted the best busi- ness plan and made the best offer. In the end, only two interested parties remained, the German company Winterling Porzellan AG of Kirchenla- mitz, and the French company Medard de Noblat of Limoges. On 18 June 1997 the fixed assets of Triptis GmbH (in liquidation) were sold to Winterling for DEM 2,5 million. Winterling also offered an investment guar- antee of DEM 8 million and the maintenance of 160 jobs. The Winterling offer was therefore held to be the better, because Medart de Noblat offered to pay just DEM 1, promised investment of DEM 4 million and would give no employment guarantee. As regards capacity reduction, there is information to the effect that in 1996 capacity amounted to 3 000 tonnes and utilisation was 2 300 tonnes on five working days. There are no plans for the ‘new' Triptis to cut its capacity further: it will remain at 3 000 tonnes with utilisation reaching 2 880 tonnes on seven working days. Although the new company will not receive any restruc- turing aid, Thuringia is planning to grant resources from the joint Federal/L(cid:132)nder programme (GA-Mittel) for new investment under the approved twenty-sixth outline plan for the joint Federal/L(cid:132)nder programme (1). V By letter dated 16 December 1997, the Commission sent the German authorities the comments of third parties, namely of one Spanish competitor, which it had received after the decision to initiate proceedings had been published. The Spanish competitor expressed concern about the effects on the European porcelain market if Triptis were to be restructured with State financial support. It argued that Triptis would have a considerable advantage because the competitor would have to finance restructuring meas- ures out of its own resources whereas Triptis was receiving State aid to do so. This would seriously affect competition in a market where overcapacity was enormous and would damage competitors which did not receive financial support from the state. The competitor also argued that the flexibility with which the Commission can act as regards the question of capacity reduction in assisted areas would enable it to avoid any capacity reduction altogether. For this reason restructuring aid must always be tied to capacity reduction. The competitor could therefore only agree to a smaller reduction. The third argument was that Triptis was planning to increase its export share from 20 % to 38 % which, in view of the overcapacity which already existed on the market, would be to the detriment of its West European competitors. VI By letter dated 1 December 1997, the German authorities replied to the Spanish competitor’s comments. The letter confirmed that HeLaBa was laying claim to DEM 16,75 million under the special insolvency proceed- ings, whereas Thuringia was not claiming the DEM 9 million which were requested by HeLaBa on basis of the guarantee. (1) N 123/97. 27. 2. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 52/51 The BvS was claiming a total amount of DEM 19 717 567 (DEM 8,75 million as a penalty for employment guaran- tees, DEM 2,685 million as a penalty for inability to demonstrate proper application of reserve funds and DEM 8 million (plus interest) representing the waiver of repay- ment). On the question of capacity, the letter referred to the notification, which had already mentioned a capacity reduction from 6 500 tonnes to 3 000 tonnes since priva- tisation in 1993; but it repeated that for the future there were no plans for further capacity reduction in relation to the new aid. VII The Article 93(2) proceedings confirmed the Commis- sion’s view that the BvS loan of DEM 8 million (plus interest) must be regarded as aid within the meaning of Article 92(1) of the EC Treaty and is not compatible with the derogations laid down in Article 92(3), and in partic- ular with the ‘Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty', the only basis on which the aid could have been approved. The same applies to Thuringia’s unlawful guarantees of DEM 26,75 million which were revealed in the course of the proceedings. It is further established that HeLaBa’s waiver of repay- ment of the DEM 10 million loan under concerted action does not in itself constitute aid within the meaning of Article 92(1) of the EC Treaty, as the loan was secured by a 90 % State guarantee. Such a guarantee shifts the risk which a bank runs in lending to a company (irrespective of whether the company is in difficulty or not) almost entirely to the public authorities, leaving almost no risk for the bank itself. (1) The amount of DEM 8 million (plus interest) granted to Triptis in the form of a loan on which the interest rate was 4,4 % is undoubtedly aid within the meaning of Article 92(1) of the EC Treaty and Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement. Since the company had been in difficulties since its privatisation in 1993, no private bank or private investor would have granted a loan at less than the market interest rate, which in 1996 stood at 7,33 %. The difficulties were mostly rooted in the late privatisation, because no private investor could be found before then, so that no restructuring plan could be developed and implemented. As a result the neces- sary investments were delayed and the company acquired high liabilities while having to continue inefficient production with its obsolete equipment. The DEM 8 million loan (plus interest) was then waived under the concerted action. The aid intensity was already around 100 % because the company was in difficulties within the meaning of the Commission communication to the Member States on the applica- tion of Articles 92 and 93 of the EC Treaty to public undertakings (1). Consequently, the waiver of the loan does not increase the aid intensity. (2) Thuringia’s guarantees of DEM 26,75 million (in several instalments) must also be regarded as aid within the meaning of Article 92(1) of the EC Treaty. The aid element deriving from such a guarantee is generally equal to the difference between the interest rate on a loan raised on normal market terms and the actual interest rate secured by virtue of the guarantee. The Commission has consistently taken the view, as for example in Decision 94/696/EC (2), that whenever, because of an undertaking’s severe financial circum- stances, no credit institution would be prepared to lend to it without a State guarantee, the whole amount of the loan is to be regarded as aid. Since in this case the guarantee is for 90 %, the aid granted amounts to DEM 24,075 million. As regards the aid awarded to Triptis, it could be assumed that it would probably distort competition and affect trade between Member States. Triptis produces and sells household porcelain in the upper A segment. In 1995 the relevant market (A segment) was about DEM 341 million in West Germany and about DEM 98 million in East Germany. Triptis had a market share of 3,6 % on the German market, one of the largest porcelain markets in the Community. ceramic/porcelain sector between Trade Germany and the other Member States is strong. In 1993 German imports of tableware and ornamental ceramics amounted to ECU 357,02 million and exports amounted to ECU 403,97 million. in the sector has The Community ceramic goods total production approaching ECU 17 billion and employs around 210 000 people involving over 2 500 com- panies. European production grew by an average 0,9 % per annum and consumption by 1,18 % over the 1984 to 1993 period. Triptis became heavily involved in intra-Community trade. Roughly 20 % of its output was supplied to the West European market, in particular Italy, France and Sweden. For this reason, any aid to Triptis Porzellan GmbH is likely to improve its position on the market vis-(cid:133)-vis its competitors in the Community which do not receive State support. (1) OJ C 307, 13. 11. 1993, p. 3. (2) OJ L 273, 25. 10. 1994, p. 22. L 52/52 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 27. 2. 1999 The aid programme for Thuringia’s guarantees (1) on which the 1993 and 1994 guarantees were clearly based (2), was not notified at the time and has still not been approved for the period 1992 to 1994. The aid an therefore not granted under measures were approved aid scheme and therefore, pursuant to Article 93(3) of the EC Treaty, should have been noti- fied individually, before being put into effect. The German authorities did not comply with this require- ment under Article 93(3) since the BvS loan and the Land guarantees were granted without first being approved by the Commission. This means that the aid is unlawful. While there would have been a possibility of exempting the aid from the prohibition under Article 92(1) of the EC Treaty, the derogations laid down in Article 92(2) are not applicable in this case, because of the nature of the aid and the fact that no attempt was made to meet the conditions in which these deroga- tions apply. As regards the derogations under Article 92(3) of the EC Treaty, it is true that Triptis is located in an area where there is serious underemployment or where the standard of living is abnormally low. According to Article 92(3)(a), aid to promote the economic develop- ment of such areas may be considered to be compat- ible with the common market. The aid in question certainly did not contribute to the economic develop- ment of the region, since it served primarily to keep a loss-making firm on the market, and not to create investment and jobs. Consequently it must be regarded as ad hoc aid directed towards restoring the viability of a company in difficulties in an economic- ally weakened region. Compatibility is therefore assessed under Article 92(3)(c), since the restructuring of a company in diffi- culty is involved. For this derogation to be applicable, the aid must satisfy the conditions laid down by the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty. It must, in particular: — restore the viability of the firm within a reasonable time scale and on the basis of a sound and realistic restructuring programme, — avoid undue distortion of competition. This means that for any aid to be approved under the guide- lines, measures must be taken to offset as far as (1) Richtlinie f(cid:129)r die (cid:154)bernahme von B(cid:129)rgschaften und Garan- tien zugunsten der Wirtschaft und der freien Berufe durch den Freistaat Th(cid:129)ringen (Programme for taking over guaran- tees in favour of business and the liberal professions by Thuringia) of 18 June 1992. As the Commission explicitly the next guarantee in the approval of stated in its letter, programme in 1996, no account was taken of its predecessors: SG(96)D/11031. (2) At no time during the proceedings did Thuringia refer to this legal basis. to Article 92(3)(c) of since possible adverse effects on competitors, otherwise the aid would be contrary to the common interest and ineligible for exemption pursuant the EC Treaty. Therefore, where an objective assessment of the demand and supply situation shows that there is a structural excess of production capacity in a rele- vant market in the Community, the restructuring plan must make a contribution, proportionate to the amount of aid received, to the restructuring of the industry serving the relevant market in the Community by irreversibly reducing or closing capacity. However, the Commission is able to apply this principle more flexibly in an area coming under Article 93(3)(a) of the EC Treaty, — limit the amount of aid to the strict minimum. The analysis of the measures should prove that the aid is proportionate to the costs and benefits of restructuring. The form in which the aid is granted must be such as to avoid providing the company with surplus cash. The aid must not be used for for activities or aggressive, market-distorting investment not the restructuring required for process, but must be absolutely necessary to solve the special problems of the company. As regards the first condition, when it initiated the Article 93(2) proceedings the Commission, basing itself on the figures which were submitted by the German authorities in the notification and subsequent information, expressed no doubts whatsoever as to the company’s viability. These forecasts assume a steady increase in annual turnover, a return to viability in 1997/98 and a profit of DEM 1,25 million in the same year. Therefore the doubts which led to the initiation of proceedings concerned only the question of capacity and uncertainty as to the exact amount of the aid. As was then shown by the company’s bankruptcy on 30 April 1997, the figures, which had been submitted only five months earlier, were obviously either already out of date when they reached the Commission or were based on unrealistic assump- tions. What is more, the German authorities were apparently aware of this fact before the Commission was informed. initiated proceedings, Furthermore, when it the Commission knew nothing of the unlawful aid of DEM 26,75 million in the form of guarantees from Thuringia. It also seems that in 1993 and 1994, i. e. at the time when the aid was granted, no viable restruc- turing plan existed and that therefore this aid was unrelated to any restructuring effort. 27. 2. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 52/53 So, despite all efforts, the viability of Triptis could not be restored, and at the same time the aim of the concerted action — to save Triptis from bankruptcy — was not attained either. bute any more funds. In view of the fact that these are private individuals and not firms with the corre- sponding financial resources, their contribution can be described as appropriate. As regards the second condition, it emerged during the proceedings that overcapacity does exist in the porcelain industry. Community production and consumption of ceramic goods grew steadily between 1984 and 1991, and then fell back in 1992 and 1993. A recovery in production figures has been expected since 1994. Even an increase in exports cannot compensate for the pressure of competition in this sector. On the contrary, the strained competitive situa- tion connected with the overcapacity within the Community could intensify further as a result of from south-east Asia and the increasing imports central and east European countries, particularly the Czech Republic and Hungary, which benefit from their trade agreements with the Community. This situation led to high production costs and the overca- pacity which exists in the Community tableware sector. Therefore there is still a long way to go before restructuring is achieved. During the proceedings it was established that in view of the severe overcapacity in the porcelain industry, the aid granted to Triptis did in fact unduly distort competition and that consequently the payment damaged competitors which did not receive aid and had to manage structural adjustment with their own resources. The presumption that the aid to Triptis was likely unduly to distort competition is confirmed by the reaction of a Spanish competitor which it sent to the Commission. According to the third condition, the form in which the aid is granted must be such as to avoid providing the company with surplus cash which could be used for an aggressive market policy not linked to the restructuring process. A major part of the aid was granted as far back as 1993 and 1994 and was neces- sitated by the high liabilities and interest payments. The same applies to the DEM 8 million made avail- able to Triptis, of which only DEM 600 000 was avail- able as liquidity. DEM 7,4 million was used to cover the losses incurred in the years 1994 to 1996. As regards the proportionality of the aid, Triptis had already contributed DEM 17 million to investment and DEM 24,7 million to cover losses. In addition, in 1996 the enterprise promised to invest a further DEM 2,5 million, with each of the investors contributing DEM 100 000. their own this resources, they are no longer in a position to contri- exhausts Since Since already two of the three criteria set out in the guidelines are not met, the aid cannot be approved on the basis of Article 92(3)(c) of the EC Treaty. Taking all these facts into account the Commission has to conclude that both the BvS loan of DEM 8 million (plus interest) and the individual guarantees totalling DEM 26,75 million (aid intensity DEM 24,075 million) granted by Thuringia must be regarded as aid to which none of the derogations laid down in Article 92(3) applies. (3) HeLeBa’s waiver of the DEM 10 million loan under concerted action does not in itself constitute aid, since it was provided under a 90 % State guarantee, which constitutes the aid element of the action. In this connection, it seems reasonable to assume that normal market behaviour is involved, although the public authorities have secured 90 % of the loan and have thus taken over most of the risk. (4) As regards the continuation arrangements (Auffangl(cid:148)- sung) which were established after Triptis went bank- rupt and under which Winterling took over the company’s fixed assets, the extent to which this offer can be considered the best has still to be settled. After an open and unconditional invitation to tender, two interested parties remained, Winterling and the French company Medart de Noblat. Winterling offered a purchase price of DEM 2,5 million and an investment guarantee of DEM 8 million and under- took to keep 160 employees. Medart de Noblat offered a purchase price of only DEM 1, an investment guar- antee of DEM 4 million and no employment guar- antee. On this basis, Winterling’s offer could be regarded as the better of the two. As a result, the fixed assets of Triptis were sold to Winterling on 18 June 1997. This admits of the conclusion that no aid meas- ures were involved in Winterling’s purchase of the Triptis fixed assets. According to the information submitted by Germany on 9 September 1997, the new company will receive no restructuring aid, except for funds for new invest- the ment which Thuringia plans to grant under approved twenty-sixth outline plan for the joint Federal/L(cid:132)nder programme. While this subsidy is to be regarded as aid, is covered by Commission approval. Any further aid to the new company must be notified to the Commission. it L 52/54 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 27. 2. 1999 VIII In cases where aid is deemed incompatible with the common market, the Commission requires the Member State to reclaim the aid from the recipient (1). Since this applies to the measures in favour of Triptis which are the subject of this Decision, the aid must be recovered. Nor does the fact that Triptis has in the meantime filed for insolvency make any difference to this assessment. The recovery of the aid must take place in accordance with German law, including the rules on default interest on claims governed by public law in accordance with the normal market reference interest rate in force; interest runs from the date on which the aid was granted (2). In accordance with the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in Case C-142/87 Belgium v. Commission (3) the provisions relevant for the recovery of aid are to be applied in such a way that the recovery required by Community law is not rendered practically impossible. Any procedural or other difficulties in regard to the implementation of the measure cannot have any influence on its lawfulness, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Article 1 Both the loan of DEM 8 million (plus interest) granted by the Bundesanstalt vereinigungsbedingter Sonderauf- gaben and the 90 % guarantee provided by Thuringia to Triptis Porzellan GmbH (in several instalments) for loans totalling DEM 26,75 million (aid amount — DEM 24,075 million) are unlawful since they were granted without the Commission having first been notified in accordance with Article 93(3) of the EC Treaty. In accordance with Article 92(1) of the EC Treaty and Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement, the aid is incompat- ible with the common market, since it meets none of the conditions contained in those Articles under which an exemption or derogation can be granted. Article 2 Germany shall ensure that the aid referred to in Article 1 is reclaimed and repaid in full within two months of the date of notification of this Decision. The aid shall be recovered in accordance with the proced- ures and provisions of German law, and in particular the rules on default interest on claims governed by public law, and includes interest on the aid which starts to run from the date on which it was granted until it is repaid, with the rate applied being the reference rate used to calculate the net grant equivalent of regional aid in Germany. These provisions shall be applied in such a way that the recovery required by Community law is not rendered practically impossible. Any procedural or other difficulties in regard to the implementation of the measure shall not have any influence on its lawfulness. Article 3 Germany shall inform the Commission within two months of notification of this Decision of the measures it has taken to comply with it. Article 4 This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany. Done at Brussels, 22 April 1998. For the Commission Karel VAN MIERT Member of the Commission (1) Commission communication of 24 November 1983 (OJ C 318, 24. 11. 1983, p. 3). (2) Letter from the Commission to the Member States SG(91) D/ 4577 of 4 March 1991. (3) ECR [1990] I-959 (paragraphs 58 to 63)


title: Odločba Komisije z dne 22. aprila 1998 o dajanju gensko spremenjene spomladanske švedske repice v promet (Brassica napus L. ssp. oleifera), na podlagi Direktive Sveta 90/220/EGSbesedilo se nanaša na EGP

eurovoc_concepts:
United Kingdom
food inspection
genetically modified organism
market approval
oil seed rape
seed

text: 03/Zv. 23 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 71 31998D0291 L 131/26 URADNI LIST EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI 5. 5. 1998 ODLOČBA KOMISIJE z dne 22. aprila 1998 o dajanju gensko spremenjene spomladanske švedske repice v promet (Brassica napus L. ssp. oleifera), na podlagi Direktive Sveta 90/220/EGS (besedilo se nanaša na EGP) (98/291/ES) KOMISIJA EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI JE ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, — priskrbljena dokumentacija o proizvodu bo med drugim vključevala informacijo, da je bil proizvod proizveden z gensko spremembo, kot informacije o možnih tudi uporabah proizvoda, ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 90/220/EGS z dne 23. aprila 1990 o namernem sproščanju gensko spremenjenih organiz- mov v okolje (1), kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direk- tivo Komisije 97/35/ES (2), in zlasti njenega člena 13, — v dokumentaciji o proizvodu bo tudi navedeno, da se v Skupnosti za proizvode, ki izvirajo iz gensko spremenjene švedske repice, lahko uporabljajo posebne zahteve za ozna- čevanje; ker členi 10 do 18 Direktive 90/220/EGS določajo postopek Skupnosti, ki omogoča pristojnim organom države članice, da odobrijo dajanje proizvodov, ki vsebujejo ali so sestavljeni iz gensko spremenjenih organizmov, v promet; ker mora zato skladno s členom 13(3) Direktive 90/220/EGS Komisija sprejeti odločitev po postopku, določenem v členu 21 te direktive; ker je bila prijava za dajanje takšnega proizvoda v promet, predložena pristojnim organom Združenega Kraljestva; ker so pristojni organi Združenega Kraljestva Komisiji nato dostavili spis o tem s pozitivnim mnenjem; odborov, ustanovljenih ker je Komisija o tem spisu pridobila mnenje ustreznih Znan- stvenih Sklepom Komisije 97/579/ES (3); ker je Znanstveni odbor za rastline 10. februarja 1998 dostavil mnenje z zaključki, da ni nobenega razloga za domnevo, da naj bi uvoz proizvoda za namen predelave kakor- koli škodljivo učinkoval na človekovo zdravje ali okolje; s ker so pristojni organi drugih držav članic dali ugovore na omenjeni spis; ker je prijavitelj naknadno uradno zahteval, da se področje prijave omeji na „ravnanje z proizvodom med uvozom in pred ter med skladiščenjem in predelavo“; ker je Komisija potem, ko je pregledala vse ugovore, dane na podlagi Direktive 90/220/EGS, informacije, predložene v spisu, in mnenje Znanstvenega odbora za rastline, zaključila, da ni nobenega razloga za domnevo, da bo ravnanje s proizvodom v okolju med uvozom in pred ter med skladiščenjem in prede- lavo, škodljivo učinkovalo na človekovo zdravje ali okolje; ker je prijavitelj naknadno spremenil predlagano označevanje v originalnem spisu kakor sledi: — tistim podjetjem, za katera je znano, da uvažajo proizvod za predelavo v Skupnost, bo priskrbljena dokumentacija o proizvodu, ki jih bo seznanila z možnostjo, da je proizvod iz prijave, ki je bil proizveden zunaj Skupnosti po licenci družbe Hoechst Schering AgrEvo GmbH, lahko navzoč v velikih pošiljkah švedske repice, ker člen 11(6) in člen 16(1) Direktive 90/220/EGS zagotavljata dodatno jamstvo za primer, če se pojavijo nove informacije o tveganjih proizvoda; ker so ukrepi, določeni v tej odločbi, skladni z mnenjem člena 21 Direktive odbora, ustanovljenega na podlagi 90/220/EGS, (1) UL L 117, 8. 5. 1990, str. 15. (2) UL L 169, 27. 6. 1997, str. 72. (3) UL L 237, 28. 8. 1997, str. 18. 72 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 03/Zv. 23 SPREJELA NASLEDNJO ODLOČBO: Člen 1 1. Brez vpliva na drugo zakonodajo Skupnosti, in zlasti na Uredbo (ES) št. 258/97 Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta (1), in skladno z odstavkom 2 tega člena, pristojni organi Združenega Kraljestva odobrijo dajanje v promet za naslednji proizvod, ki ga je prijavil AgrEvo UK Crop Protection (vir C/UK/95/M5/1): semena spomladanske švedske repice (Brassica napus L. spp. olei- fera), ki izhajajo iz tradicionalnega križanja med negensko spre- je rezultat spremembe menjeno švedsko repico in linijo, ki Topas 19/2, ki je bil spremenjen z uporabo plazmida pOCA/ AC, ki vsebuje: (a) sintetični pat gen, ki kodira fosfinotricin acetiltransferazo in je reguliran s 35S promotorskim in terminatorskim zapo- redjem iz mozaičnega virusa cvetače in (b) npt II gen, ki kodira neomicin fosfotransferazo II in je regu- liran s promotorskim nopalin sintaznim in terminatorskim aktopin sintaznim zaporedjem. 2. Odobritev se nanaša na dajanje proizvoda v promet ali ravnanje z njim v okolju med uvozom ter pred in med skladiš- čenjem in predelavo. Ta odločba je naslovljena na države članice. Člen 2 V Bruslju, 22. aprila 1998 Za Komisijo Ritt BJERREGAARD Član Komisije (1) UL L 43, 14. 2. 1997, str. 1


title: Komisjoni määrus (EÜ) nr 843/98, 22. aprill 1998, millega muudetakse nõukogu määrust (EÜ) nr 2200/97 seoses õunapuude, pirnipuude, virsikupuude ja virsikupuu nektariinisortide all olevate juurimistoetuse saamise tingimustele vastavate alade jaotusega liikmesriikide kaupa

eurovoc_concepts:
area of holding
grubbing premium
orchard
pip fruit
stone fruit
terms for aid

text: 03/22. kd ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 457 31998R0843 L 120/10 EUROOPA ÜHENDUSTE TEATAJA 23. 4. 1998 KOMISJONI MÄÄRUS (EÜ) nr 843/98, 22. aprill 1998, millega muudetakse nõukogu määrust (EÜ) nr 2200/97 seoses õunapuude, pirnipuude, virsiku- puude ja virsikupuu nektariinisortide all olevate juurimistoetuse saamise tingimustele vastavate alade jaotusega liikmesriikide kaupa EUROOPA ÜHENDUSTE KOMISJON, ON VASTU VÕTNUD KÄESOLEVA MÄÄRUSE: võttes arvesse Euroopa Ühenduse asutamislepingut, Artikkel 1 võttes arvesse nõukogu 30. oktoobri 1997. aasta määrust (EÜ) nr 2200/97 ühenduse õuna-, pirni-, virsiku- ja nektariinitoo- dangu parandamise kohta, (1) eriti selle artikli 1 lõiget 2, ning arvestades, et: määruse (EÜ) nr 2200/97 artikli 1 lõikega 2 jaotatakse liik- mesriikide kaupa õunapuude, pirnipuude, virsikupuude ja virsi- kupuu nektariinisortide all olevad alad, mille eest võib vastavalt kõnealuse määruse artikli 1 lõikele 1 anda juurimistoetust; kõnealuse määruse artikli 1 lõikega 2 nähakse ette kõnealuse jaotamise muutmisel kohaldatavad määrad ja muutmise kord; komisjonile 1. aprilli 1998. aasta seisuga saabunud teabe koha- selt hõlmavad mõnedes liikmesriikides juurimistoetuse taotlused väiksemaid alasid, kui on märgitud eespool nimetatud määruse artikli 1 lõikes 2; kokku on veel kasutamata 630 hektarit õuna- ja pirnipuude puhul ning 1 264 hektarit virsikupuude ja virsikupuu nektariinisortide puhul; kõnealune pindala tuleks taotlustega hõlmatud alad eraldada ületavad artikli 1 lõikes 2 märgitud alasid, ja eelkõige liikmesriikidele, kus turult kõrvalda- mine moodustab suurima protsendimäära toodangust; siiski ei tuleks üle kanda 50 hektarist väiksemaid alasid; liikmesriikidele, eespool nimetatud määruse kus Määruse (EÜ) nr 2200/97 artikli 1 lõikes 2 olev tabel asenda- takse järgmisega: Liikmesriik Õunad ja pirnid (ha) Virsikud ja nekta- riinid (ha) “Belgia Saksamaa Taani Kreeka Hispaania Prantsusmaa Iirimaa Itaalia Luksemburg Madalmaad Austria Portugal Soome Rootsi Ühendkuningriik 118 894 — 599 1 412 3 181 — 2 389 — 593 139 325 5 40 305 — — 3 2 780 2 564 1 414 — 2 994 — — 19 226 — — —” käesoleva määrusega ettenähtud meetmed on kooskõlas puu- ja köögiviljaturu korralduskomitee arvamusega, Käesolev määrus jõustub kolmandal päeval pärast selle avalda- mist Euroopa Ühenduste Teatajas. Artikkel 2 Käesolev määrus on tervikuna siduv ja vahetult kohaldatav kõikides liikmesriikides. Brüssel, 22. aprill 1998 Komisjoni nimel komisjoni liige Franz FISCHLER (1) EÜT L 303, 6. 11. 1997, lk 3


title: 98/291/CE: Decisão da Comissão de 22 de Abril de 1998 relativa à colocação no mercado de colza de Primavera (Brassica napus L. spp. oleifera) geneticamente modificada, nos termos da Directiva 90/220/CEE do Conselho (Texto relevante para efeitos do EEE)

text: L 131/26 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias 5. 5. 98 DECIS(cid:212)O DA COMISS(cid:212)O de 22 de Abril de 1998 relativa (cid:133) coloca(cid:135)(cid:209)o no mercado de colza de Primavera (Brassica napus L. spp. oleifera) geneticamente modificada, nos termos da Directiva 90/220/CEE do Conselho (Texto relevante para efeitos do EEE) (98/291/CE) A COMISS(cid:212)O DAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEIAS, Tendo em conta o Tratado que institui a Comunidade Europeia, Tendo em conta a Directiva 90/220/CEE do Conselho, de 23 de Abril de 1990, relativa (cid:133) liberta(cid:135)(cid:209)o deliberada no ambiente de organismos geneticamente modificados (1), com a (cid:156)ltima redac(cid:135)(cid:209)o que lhe foi dada pela Directiva 97/35/CE da Comiss(cid:209)o (2) e, nomeadamente, o seu artigo 13º, AgrEvo GmbH, poder estar presente em remessas de colza a granel, (cid:190) a documenta(cid:135)(cid:209)o do produto a fornecer incluir(cid:145), nomeadamente, a informa(cid:135)(cid:209)o de que o produto foi produzido por modifica(cid:135)(cid:209)o gen(cid:130)tica, bem como infor- ma(cid:135)(cid:210)es sobre as utiliza(cid:135)(cid:210)es potenciais do produto, (cid:190) a documenta(cid:135)(cid:209)o do produto indicar(cid:145) igualmente que poder(cid:209)o ser aplic(cid:145)veis na Comunidade requisitos espe- c(cid:146)ficos de rotulagem relativamente a produtos deri- vados de colza geneticamente modificada; Considerando que os artigos 10º a 18º da Directiva 90/ /220/CEE prev(cid:136)em um procedimento comunit(cid:145)rio que permite (cid:133) autoridade competente de um Estado-membro autorizar a coloca(cid:135)(cid:209)o no mercado de produtos que cont(cid:136)m ou consistem em organismos geneticamente modificados; Considerando por conseguinte que, nos termos do nº 3 do artigo 13º da Directiva 90/220/CEE, a Comiss(cid:209)o deve adoptar uma decis(cid:209)o de acordo com o procedimento previsto no artigo 21º da referida directiva; Considerando que foi apresentada (cid:133) autoridade compe- tente do Reino Unido uma notifica(cid:135)(cid:209)o relativa (cid:133) coloca(cid:135)(cid:209)o no mercado de um produto desse tipo; Considerando que as autoridades competentes do Reino Unido enviaram o processo (cid:133) Comiss(cid:209)o, acompanhado de um parecer favor(cid:145)vel; Considerando que a Comiss(cid:209)o solicitou o parecer dos comit(cid:130)s cient(cid:146)ficos relevantes, institu(cid:146)dos pela Decis(cid:209)o 97/ /579/CE da Comiss(cid:209)o (3), relativamente a este processo; que o Comit(cid:130) Cient(cid:146)fico das Plantas emitiu o seu parecer em 10 de Fevereiro de 1998, concluindo n(cid:209)o haver raz(cid:209)o para crer que a importa(cid:135)(cid:209)o do produto para fins de trans- forma(cid:135)(cid:209)o pudesse ter qualquer efeito nocivo na sa(cid:156)de humana ou no ambiente; Considerando que as autoridades competentes de outros Estados-membros referido processo; levantaram objec(cid:135)(cid:210)es ao Considerando que o notificador apresentou subsequente- mente um pedido para limita(cid:135)(cid:209)o do (cid:131)mbito da notifica(cid:135)(cid:209)o (cid:133) «manipula(cid:135)(cid:209)o do produto durante a importa(cid:135)(cid:209)o e antes e durante o seu armazenamento e transforma(cid:135)(cid:209)o»; Considerando que o notificador alterou subsequente- mente rotulagem proposta no processo original, conforme a seguir indicado: a (cid:190) a documenta(cid:135)(cid:209)o do produto ser(cid:145) (cid:133)s empresas de que se tem conhecimento que importam o produto para a Comunidade para fins de transfor- ma(cid:135)(cid:209)o, informando-as da possibilidade de o produto abrangido pela notifica(cid:135)(cid:209)o e produzido fora da Comu- nidade por ou mediante licen(cid:135)a da Hoechst Schering fornecida Considerando que a Comiss(cid:209)o, depois de analisar cada objec(cid:135)(cid:209)o levantada com base na Directiva 90/220/CEE, nas informa(cid:135)(cid:210)es apresentadas no processo e no parecer do Comit(cid:130) Cient(cid:146)fico das Plantas, concluiu n(cid:209)o haver motivos para crer que se registem efeitos nocivos para a sa(cid:156)de humana ou para o ambiente decorrentes da mani- pula(cid:135)(cid:209)o do produto no ambiente durante a importa(cid:135)(cid:209)o e antes e durante o seu armazenamento e transforma(cid:135)(cid:209)o; Considerando que o nº 6 do artigo 11º e o nº 1 do artigo 16º da Directiva 90/220/CEE prev(cid:136)em salvaguardas suple- mentares no caso de se obterem novas informa(cid:135)(cid:210)es sobre eventuais riscos associados ao produto; Considerando que as medidas previstas na presente decis(cid:209)o est(cid:209)o de acordo com o parecer do comit(cid:130) previsto no artigo 21º da Directiva 90/220/CEE, (1) JO L 117 de 8. 5. 1990, p. 15. (2) JO L 169 de 27. 6. 1997, p. 72. (3) JO L 237 de 28. 8. 1997, p. 18. 5. 5. 98 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias L 131/27 ADOPTOU A PRESENTE DECIS(cid:212)O: Artigo 1º Sem preju(cid:146)zo do disposto noutros actos legislativos 1. comunit(cid:145)rios, nomeadamente no Regulamento (CE) nº 258/97 do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho (1), e tendo em conta o nº 2 do presente artigo, a autoridade compe- tente do Reino Unido pode autorizar a coloca(cid:135)(cid:209)o no mercado do produto a seguir indicado, notificado pela AgrEvo UK Crop Protection Ltd (ref. C/UK/95/M5/1): gr(cid:209)os de colza de primavera (Brassica napus L. ssp. olei- fera) derivada de cruzamentos tradicionais de melhora- mento entre colza modificada por t(cid:130)cnicas n(cid:209)o gen(cid:130)ticas e uma linha resultante da transforma(cid:135)(cid:209)o Topas 19/2 efec- tuada atrav(cid:130)s do plasm(cid:146)deo pOCA/Ac contendo: a) Um gene pat sint(cid:130)tico que codifica para a fosfinotri- cina-acetiltransferase, regulado por um promotor 35S e por sequ(cid:136)ncias de terminador do v(cid:146)rus do mosaico da couve-flor, e b) Um gene npt II que codifica para a neomicina-fosfo- transferase II, regulado pelo promotor da nopalina- -sintetase e por uma sequ(cid:136)ncia de terminador da octo- pina-sintetase. 2. A presente autoriza(cid:135)(cid:209)o abrange a coloca(cid:135)(cid:209)o no mercado do produto para fins de manipula(cid:135)(cid:209)o no ambien- te durante a importa(cid:135)(cid:209)o e antes e durante o armazena- mento e transforma(cid:135)(cid:209)o. Artigo 2º Os Estados-membros s(cid:209)o os destinat(cid:145)rios da presente decis(cid:209)o. Feito em Bruxelas, em 22 de Abril de 1998. Pela Comiss(cid:209)o Ritt BJERREGAARD Membro da Comiss(cid:209)o (1) JO L 43 de 14. 2. 1997, p. 1


title: Commission Regulation (EC) No 849/98 of 22 April 1998 altering the corrective amount applicable to the refund on cereals

eurovoc_concepts:
cereals
export refund
third country

formats: pdf print

text: 23. 4. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 120/21 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 849/98 of 22 April 1998 altering the corrective amount applicable to the refund on cereals THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organization of the market in cereals (1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 923/96 (2), and in particular Article 13 (8) thereof, Whereas the corrective amount applicable to the refund on cereals was fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 565/98 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 800/ 98 (4); Whereas, on the basis of today’s cif prices and cif forward delivery prices, taking foreseeable developments on the market into account, the corrective amount at present applicable to the refund on cereals should be altered; Whereas the corrective amount must be fixed according to the same procedure as the refund; whereas it may be altered in the period between fixings; Whereas the representative market rates defined in Article 1 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3813/92 (5), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 150/95 (6), are used to convert amounts expressed in third country currencies and are used as the basis for determining the agricultural conversion rates of the Member States’ currencies; whereas detailed rules on the application and determina- tion of these conversions were set by Commission Regu- lation (EEC) No 1068/93 (7), as last amended by Regula- tion (EC) No 1482/96 (8), HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 The corrective amount referred to in Article 1 (1) (a), (b) and (c) of Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 which is applic- able to the export refunds fixed in advance in respect of the products referred to, except for malt, is hereby altered to the amounts set out in the Annex hereto. Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 April 1998. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, 22 April 1998. For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission (1) OJ L 181, 1. 7. 1992, p. 21. (2) OJ L 126, 24. 5. 1996, p. 37. (3) OJ L 76, 13. 3. 1998, p. 14. (4) OJ L 114, 16. 4. 1998, p. 30. (5) OJ L 387, 31. 12. 1992, p. 1. (6) OJ L 22, 31. 1. 1995, p. 1. (7) OJ L 108, 1. 5. 1993, p. 106. (8) OJ L 188, 27. 7. 1996, p. 22. L 120/22 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23. 4. 98 to the Commission Regulation of 22 April 1998 altering the corrective amount applicable to the refund on cereals ANNEX Product code Destination (1) Current 4 1st period 5 2nd period 6 3rd period 7 4th period 8 5th period 9 6th period 10 (ECU / tonne) 1001 10 00 9200 1001 10 00 9400 1001 90 91 9000 1001 90 99 9000 1002 00 00 9000 1003 00 10 9000 1003 00 90 9000 1004 00 00 9200 1004 00 00 9400 1005 10 90 9000 1005 90 00 9000 1007 00 90 9000 1008 20 00 9000 1101 00 11 9000 1101 00 15 9100 1101 00 15 9130 1101 00 15 9150 1101 00 15 9170 1101 00 15 9180 1101 00 15 9190 1101 00 90 9000 1102 10 00 9500 1102 10 00 9700 1102 10 00 9900 1103 11 10 9200 1103 11 10 9400 1103 11 10 9900 1103 11 90 9200 1103 11 90 9800 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 03 02 01 (cid:190) 01 (cid:190) 01 (cid:190) 01 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 01 01 01 01 01 (cid:190) (cid:190) 01 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 01 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 0 0 0 (cid:190) 0 (cid:190) 0 (cid:190) 0 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 0 0 0 0 0 (cid:190) (cid:190) 0 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 0 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) +3,00 0 0 (cid:190) 0 (cid:190) 0 (cid:190) 0 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 0 0 0 0 0 (cid:190) (cid:190) 0 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 0 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) +3,00 0 0 (cid:190) –15,00 (cid:190) 0 (cid:190) 0 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 0 0 0 0 0 (cid:190) (cid:190) 0 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 0 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) –5,00 –5,00 –5,00 (cid:190) –15,00 (cid:190) 0 (cid:190) 0 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) –7,00 –7,00 –7,00 –7,00 –7,00 (cid:190) (cid:190) –7,00 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 0 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) –5,00 –5,00 –5,00 (cid:190) –15,00 (cid:190) 0 (cid:190) 0 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) –7,00 –7,00 –7,00 –7,00 –7,00 (cid:190) (cid:190) –7,00 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 0 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (1) The destinations are identified as follows: 01 all third countries, 02 other third countries, 03 Algeria. NB: The zones are those defined in amended Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2145/92 (OJ L 214, 30. 7. 1992, p. 20)


title: Komission asetus (EY) N:o 841/98, annettu 22 päivänä huhtikuuta 1998, valkoisen sokerin vientituen enimmäismäärän vahvistamisesta asetuksessa (EY) N:o 1408/97 tarkoitetun pysyvän tarjouskilpailun osana järjestettävää 35. osittaista tarjouskilpailua varten

eurovoc_concepts:
award of contract
export refund
white sugar

text: 23. 4. 98 FI Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)jen virallinen lehti L 120/7 KOMISSION ASETUS (EY) N:o 841/98, annettu 22 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) huhtikuuta 1998, valkoisen sokerin vientituen enimm(cid:132)ism(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)n vahvistamisesta asetuksessa (EY) N:o 1408/97 tarkoitetun pysyv(cid:132)n tarjouskilpailun osana j(cid:132)rjestett(cid:132)v(cid:132)(cid:132) 35. osittaista tarjouskilpailua varten EUROOPAN YHTEIS(cid:153)JEN KOMISSIO, joka ottaa huomioon Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)n perustamissopi- muksen, ottaa huomioon sokerialan yhteisest(cid:132) markkinaj(cid:132)rjeste- lyst(cid:132) 30 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) kes(cid:132)kuuta 1981 annetun neuvoston asetuksen (ETY) N:o 1785/81 (1), sellaisena kuin se on viimeksi muutettuna asetuksella (EY) N:o 1599/96 (2), ja erityisesti sen 17 artiklan 5 kohdan toisen alakohdan b alakohdan, sek(cid:132) katsoo, ett(cid:132) valkoisen sokerin vientimaksujen ja/tai vientitukien m(cid:132)(cid:132)ritt(cid:132)miseksi j(cid:132)rjestett(cid:132)v(cid:132)st(cid:132) pysyv(cid:132)st(cid:132) tarjouskilpailusta 22 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) hein(cid:132)kuuta 1997 annetun komission asetuksen (EY) N:o 1408/97 (3) nojalla t(cid:132)m(cid:132)n sokerin vienti(cid:132) varten j(cid:132)rjestet(cid:132)(cid:132)n osittaisia tarjouskilpailuja, asetuksen (EY) N:o 1408/97 9 artiklan 1 kohdan s(cid:132)(cid:132)n- n(cid:148)sten mukaan varten vahvistetaan tarvittaessa vientituen enimm(cid:132)ism(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132), ottaen tarjouskilpailua kyseist(cid:132) erityisesti huomioon yhteis(cid:148)n ja maailmanmarkkinoiden sokerin markkinatilanne ja sen odotettavissa oleva kehitys, tarjousten tarkastelun j(cid:132)lkeen olisi 35. tarjouskilpailusta annettava 1 artiklassa tarkoitetut s(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)kset, ja sokerin hallintokomitea ei ole antanut lausuntoa puheen- johtajansa asettamassa m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)ajassa, ON ANTANUT T(cid:142)M(cid:142)N ASETUKSEN: 1 artikla Vahvistetaan vientituen enimm(cid:132)ism(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)ksi asetuksen (EY) N:o 1408/97 nojalla j(cid:132)rjestetyss(cid:132) valkoisen sokerin 35. tarjouskilpailussa 47,281 ecua sadalta kilogrammalta. 2 artikla T(cid:132)m(cid:132) asetus tulee voimaan 23 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) huhtikuuta 1998. T(cid:132)m(cid:132) asetus on kaikilta osiltaan velvoittava, j(cid:132)senvaltioissa. ja sit(cid:132) sovelletaan sellaisenaan kaikissa Tehty Brysseliss(cid:132) 22 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) huhtikuuta 1998. Komission puolesta Franz FISCHLER Komission j(cid:132)sen (1) EYVL L 177, 1. 7. 1981, s. 4 (2) EYVL L 206, 16. 8. 1996, s. 43 (3) EYVL L 194, 23. 7. 1997, s. 16


title: Verordnung (EG) Nr. 848/98 der Kommission vom 22. April 1998 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1261/97 zur Festlegung der Bedarfsvorausschätzung und Beihilfen für die Versorgung der Kanarischen Inseln mit Zuchtkaninchen gemäß dem Artikel 4 der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1601/92 des Rates

eurovoc_concepts:
Canary Islands
aid system
breeding animal
rabbit
supply balance sheet

text: 23. 4. 98 DE Amtsblatt der Europ(cid:132)ischen Gemeinschaften L 120/19 VERORDNUNG (EG) Nr. 848/98 DER KOMMISSION vom 22. April 1998 zur (cid:142)nderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1261/97 zur Festlegung der Bedarfsvor- aussch(cid:132)tzung und Beihilfen f(cid:129)r die Versorgung der Kanarischen Inseln mit Zuchtkaninchen gem(cid:132)ß dem Artikel 4 der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1601/92 des Rates DIE KOMMISSION DER EUROP(cid:142)ISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN (cid:190) gest(cid:129)tzt auf den Vertrag zur Gr(cid:129)ndung der Europ(cid:132)ischen Gemeinschaft, gest(cid:129)tzt auf die Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1601/92 des Rates vom 15. Juni 1992 zur Einf(cid:129)hrung von Sondermaß- nahmen f(cid:129)r bestimmte landwirtschaftliche Erzeugnisse zugunsten der Kanarischen Inseln (1), zuletzt ge(cid:132)ndert durch die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2348/96 (2), insbesondere auf Artikel 4 Absatz 4, in Erw(cid:132)gung nachstehender Gr(cid:129)nde: Die f(cid:129)r die Belieferung des Archipels mit Zuchtkanin- chen mit Ursprung in der (cid:129)brigen Gemeinschaft gew(cid:132)hrten Mengen wurden mit der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1261/97 der Kommission (3) festgesetzt. Die Bedarfsvoraussch(cid:132)tzung kann w(cid:132)hrend des betref- fenden Wirtschaftsjahres der Bedarfsentwicklung ange- paßt werden. Die Angaben der zust(cid:132)ndigen Beh(cid:148)rden rechtfertigen eine Erh(cid:148)hung der Anzahl Zuchtkaninchen f(cid:129)r das Wirtschaftsjahr 1997/98. Die f(cid:129)r die Kanarischen Inseln f(cid:129)r diese Tiere festgelegte Bedarfsvoraussch(cid:132)tzung sollte deshalb angepaßt werden. Die in dieser Verordnung vorgesehenen Maßnahmen entsprechen der Stellungnahme des Verwaltungsaus- schusses f(cid:129)r Gefl(cid:129)gelfleisch und Eier (cid:190) HAT FOLGENDE VERORDNUNG ERLASSEN: Artikel 1 Der Anhang der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1261/97 wird durch den Anhang zur vorliegenden Verordnung ersetzt. Artikel 2 Diese Verordnung tritt am 1. Mai 1998 in Kraft. Diese Verordnung ist in allen ihren Teilen verbindlich und gilt unmittelbar in jedem Mitgliedstaat. Br(cid:129)ssel, den 22. April 1998 F(cid:129)r die Kommission Franz FISCHLER Mitglied der Kommission (1) ABl. L 173 vom 27. 6. 1992, S. 13. (2) ABl. L 320 vom 11. 12. 1996, S. 1. (3) ABl. L 174 vom 2. 7. 1997, S. 15. L 120/20 DE Amtsblatt der Europ(cid:132)ischen Gemeinschaften 23. 4. 98 ANHANG Belieferung der Kanarischen Inseln mit aus der Gemeinschaft stammenden Zuchtkaninchen in der Zeit vom 1. Juli 1997 bis 30. Juni 1998 KN-Code Warenbezeichnung Anzahl Beihilfe (ECU/St(cid:129)ck) ex 0106 00 10 Zuchtkaninchen (cid:190) reine Linien und Großeltern (cid:190) Eltern 1 500 3 000 30 24


title: 98/295/EF: Kommissionens beslutning af 22. april 1998 om anerkendelse af »det hellenske skibsregister« i henhold til Rådets direktiv 94/57/EF (Kun den græske tekst er autentisk) (EØS-relevant tekst)

eurovoc_concepts:
Greece
application of EU law
prevention of pollution
supervisory body
transport safety
vessel

text: L 131/34 DA De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende 5. 5. 98 KOMMISSIONENS BESLUTNING af 22. april 1998 om anerkendelse af »det hellenske skibsregister« i henhold til R(cid:134)dets direktiv 94/57/EF (Kun den græske tekst er autentisk) (EØS-relevant tekst) (98/295/EF) KOMMISSIONEN FOR DE EUROPÆISKE FÆLLESSKABER HAR (cid:190) under henvisning til Europæiske Fællesskab, traktaten om oprettelse af Det under henvisning til R(cid:134)dets direktiv 94/57/EF af 22. november 1994 om fælles regler og standarder for organi- sationer, der udfører inspektion og syn af skibe og for søfartsmyndigheders aktiviteter i forbindelse dermed (1), navnlig artikel 4, stk. 3, og ud fra følgende betragtninger: stk. 3, Artikel 4, i direktiv 94/57/EF fastsætter, at medlemsstaterne kan indgive anmodning til Kommis- sionen om godkendelse gældende for en tre(cid:134)rig periode af organisationer, der opfylder alle kravene i bilaget bortset fra dem, der er nævnt i bilagets punkt 2 og 3 i afsnittet »generelle krav«; Kommissionen har kontrolleret, at »det hellenske skibsre- gister«, som tidligere var blevet meddelt p(cid:134) grundlag af artikel 4, stk. 2, i R(cid:134)dets direktiv 94/57/EF opfylder alle kravene i bilaget til ovennævnte direktiv bortset fra dem, der er nævnt i bilagets punkt 2 og 3 i afsnittet »generelle krav«; Grækenland har indgivet en anmodning om tilpasning af anerkendelsen af »det hellenske skibsregister« i henhold til artikel 4, stk. 3, i ovennævnte direktiv; bestemmelserne i denne beslutning er i overensstemmelse med udtalelse fra det udvalg, der er indsat i henhold til artikel 7 i direktiv 94/57/EF (cid:190) VEDTAGET FØLGENDE BESLUTNING: Artikel 1 »Det hellenske skibsregister« er anerkendt i henhold til artikel 4, stk. 2, i direktiv 94/57/EF for et tidsrum p(cid:134) tre (cid:134)r at regne fra den 22. april 1998. Artikel 2 Virkningerne af denne anerkendelse er begrænset Grækenland. til Artikel 3 Denne beslutning er rettet til Den Hellenske Republik. Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 22. april 1998. P(cid:134) Kommissionens vegne Neil KINNOCK Medlem af Kommissionen (1) EFT L 319 af 12. 12. 1994, s. 20


title: Komisijas Regula (EK) Nr. 843/98 (1998. gada 22. aprīlis), ar ko groza Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 2200/97 attiecībā uz to platību sadalījumu dalībvalstīs, kurās audzē ābeles, bumbieres, persiku kokus un nektarīnu kokus, par kuriem var piešķirt piemaksu par izciršanu

text: 03/22. sēj. LV Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis 457 31998R0843 L 120/10 EIROPAS KOPIENU OFICIĀLAIS VĒSTNESIS 23. 4. 1998. KOMISIJAS REGULA (EK) Nr. 843/98 (1998. gada 22. aprīlis), ar ko groza Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 2200/97 attiecībā uz to platību sadalījumu dalībvalstīs, kurās audzē ābeles, bumbieres, persiku kokus un nektarīnu kokus, par kuriem var piešķirt piemaksu par izciršanu EIROPAS KOPIENU KOMISIJA, IR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠO REGULU. ņemot vērā Eiropas Kopienas dibināšanas līgumu, 1. pants ņemot vērā Padomes 1997. gada 30. oktobra Regulu (EK) Nr. 2200/97 par ābolu, bumbieru, persiku un nektarīnu audzē- šanas uzlabošanu Kopienā (1) un jo īpaši tās 1. panta 2. punktu, Ar šo Regulas (EK) Nr. 2200/97 1. panta 2. punkta tabulu aizstāj ar šādu tabulu: Dalībvalstis Ābeles un bumbieres (ha) Persiku un nekta- rīnu koki (ha) tā kā 1. panta 2. punktā Regulā (EK) Nr. 2200/97 sniegts to platību sadalījums pa dalībvalstīm, attiecībā uz kurām var piešķirt piemaksas par izciršanu, kā paredzēts minētās regulas 1. panta 1. punktā; tā kā minētās regulas 1. panta 2. punktā paredzēts sadalījuma grozīšanas procedūra; ierobežojums un minētā platības līdz tā kā saskaņā ar informāciju, ko Komisija ir saņēmusi 1998. gada 1. aprīlim, dažās dalībvalstīs pieprasījumi attiecībā uz piemaksām par izciršanu atbilst platībām, kuras ir mazākas par iepriekšminētās regulas 1. panta 2. punktā minētajām platībām; tā kā kopējās platības, kas vēl aizvien ir pieejamas, ir 630 hektāri ābelēm un bumbierēm un 1 264 hektāri persiku kokiem un nektarīnu kokiem; tā kā šīs platības jāpiešķir dalīb- valstīm, kurās saņemtie pieprasījumi atbilst platībām, kas ir lielākas par iepriekšminētās regulas 1. panta 2. punktā minē- tajām platībām, un vispirms – tām dalībvalstīm, kurās noraidī- tajiem pieprasījumiem atbilst augstākie ražīguma rādītāji; tā kā tomēr pārmaiņām nav jāskar platības, kas ir mazākas par aptu- veni 50 hektāriem; “Beļģija Vācija Dānija Grieķija Spānija Francija Īrija Itālija Luksemburga Nīderlande Austrija Portugāle Somija Zviedrija Apvienotā Karaliste 118 894 — 599 1 412 3 181 — 2 389 — 593 139 325 5 40 305 — — 3 2 780 2 564 1 414 — 2 994 — — 19 226 — — —” 2. pants tā kā šajā regulā paredzētie pasākumi ir saskaņā ar Augļu un dārzeņu pārvaldības komitejas atzinumu, Šī regula stājas spēkā trešajā dienā pēc tās publicēšanas Eiropas Kopienu Oficiālajā Vēstnesī. Šī regula uzliek saistības kopumā un ir tieši piemērojama visās dalībvalstīs. Briselē, 1998. gada 22. aprīlī Komisijas vārdā — Komisijas loceklis Franz FISCHLER (1) OV L 303, 6. 11. 1997. , 3. lpp


title: ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟΣ (ΕΚ) αριθ. 839/98 ΤΗΣ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗΣ της 22ας Απριλίου 1998 για τον καθορισμό των αντιπροσωπευτικών τιμών και των ποσών των πρόσθετων δασμών κατά την εισαγωγή μελάσσας στον τομέα της ζάχαρης

eurovoc_concepts:
CCT duties
import
molasses
representative price

text: 23. 4. 98 EL Ep(cid:148)sglg Evgleq(cid:148)da tym Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:150)m Joimot(cid:147)tym L 120/3 JAMOMISLOS (EJ) aqih. 839/98 TGS EPITQOPGS tgr 22ar Apqik(cid:148)ou 1998 cia tom jahoqisl(cid:149) tym amtipqosypeutij(cid:150)m til(cid:150)m jai tym pos(cid:150)m tym pq(cid:149)shetym dasl(cid:150)m jat(cid:145) tgm eisacyc(cid:147) lek(cid:145)ssar stom tol(cid:146)a tgr f(cid:145)waqgr G EPITQOPG TYM EUQYPA(cid:136)JYM JOIMOTGTYM, (cid:130)womtar up(cid:149)xg: tg sumh(cid:147)jg cia tgm (cid:148)dqusg tgr Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:147)r Joim(cid:149)tgtar, tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EOJ) aqih. 1785/81 tou Sulbouk(cid:148)ou, tgr 30(cid:147)r Ioum(cid:148)ou 1981, cia joim(cid:147) oqc(cid:145)mysg acoq(cid:145)r stom tol(cid:146)a tgr f(cid:145)waqgr (1), (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi(cid:147)hgje tekeuta(cid:148)a ap(cid:149) tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 1599/96 (2), tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 1422/95 tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r, tgr 23gr Ioum(cid:148)ou 1995, cia jahoqisl(cid:149) tym keptoleqei(cid:150)m evaqloc(cid:147)r cia tgm eisacyc(cid:147) lek(cid:145)ssar stom tol(cid:146)a tgr f(cid:145)waqgr jai cia tqopopo(cid:148)gsg tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EOJ) aqih. 785/68 (3), jai id(cid:148)yr to (cid:145)qhqo 1 paq(cid:145)cqavor 2 jai to (cid:145)qhqo 3 paq(cid:145)- cqavor 1, Ejtil(cid:150)mtar: (cid:149)ti o jamomisl(cid:149)r (EJ) aqih. 1422/95 pqobk(cid:146)pei (cid:149)ti g til(cid:147) cif jat(cid:145) tgm eisacyc(cid:147) lek(cid:145)ssar, apojako(cid:151)lemg sto en(cid:147)r «amtipqosypeutij(cid:147) til(cid:147)», jahoq(cid:148)fetai s(cid:151)lvyma le tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EOJ) aqih. 785/68 tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r (4)· (cid:149)ti g til(cid:147) aut(cid:147) emmoe(cid:148)tai (cid:149)ti jahoq(cid:148)fetai cia tom poiotij(cid:149) t(cid:151)po pou oq(cid:148)fetai sto (cid:145)qhqo 1 tou pqoamaveq(cid:149)lemou jamomislo(cid:151)· (cid:149)ti g amtipqosypeutij(cid:147) til(cid:147) tgr lek(cid:145)ssar upokoc(cid:148)fetai cia (cid:146)ma t(cid:149)po di(cid:146)keusgr tym joimotij(cid:150)m sum(cid:149)qym, o opo(cid:148)or e(cid:148)mai to (cid:129)lsteqmtal· (cid:149)ti g til(cid:147) aut(cid:147) pq(cid:146)pei ma upokoc(cid:148)fe- tai le b(cid:145)sg tir pk(cid:146)om eumo(cid:152)j(cid:146)r dumat(cid:149)tgter acoq(cid:145)r stg diehm(cid:147) acoq(cid:145), oi opo(cid:148)er diatup(cid:150)momtai b(cid:145)sei tym til(cid:150)m aut(cid:147)r tgr acoq(cid:145)r pqosaqlof(cid:149)lemym se sum(cid:145)qtgsg le tir emdew(cid:149)lemer diavoq(cid:146)r poi(cid:149)tgtar se sw(cid:146)sg le tom poiotij(cid:149) t(cid:151)po· (cid:149)ti o poiotij(cid:149)r t(cid:151)por tgr lek(cid:145)ssar jahoq(cid:148)fetai ap(cid:149) tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EOJ) aqih. 785/68· (cid:149)ti, cia tg diap(cid:148)stysg tym pk(cid:146)om eumo(cid:152)j(cid:150)m dumatot(cid:147)tym acoq(cid:145)r stg diehm(cid:147) acoq(cid:145), pq(cid:146)pei ma kalb(cid:145)momtai up(cid:149)xg (cid:149)ker oi pkgqovoq(cid:148)er swetij(cid:145) le tir pqosvoq(cid:146)r pou (cid:146)cimam stg diehm(cid:147) acoq(cid:145), oi til(cid:146)r pou diapist(cid:150)hgjam se sglamti- j(cid:146)r acoq(cid:146)r stir tq(cid:148)ter w(cid:150)qer jai oi pq(cid:145)neir p(cid:150)kgsgr pou sum(cid:147)vhgsam sto pka(cid:148)sio tym diehm(cid:150)m sumakkac(cid:150)m, stoi- we(cid:148)a ta opo(cid:148)a g Epitqop(cid:147) pkgqovoqe(cid:148)tai e(cid:148)te l(cid:146)sy tym jqat(cid:150)m lek(cid:150)m e(cid:148)te le ta dij(cid:145) tgr l(cid:146)sa· (cid:149)ti, cia tg dia- p(cid:148)stysg aut(cid:147), s(cid:151)lvyma le to (cid:145)qhqo 7 tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EOJ) aqih. 785/68, lpoqe(cid:148) ma basiste(cid:148) jame(cid:148)r se (cid:146)ma l(cid:146)so (cid:149)qo pokk(cid:150)m til(cid:150)m, le tgm pqo(cid:153)p(cid:149)hesg (cid:149)ti aut(cid:149)r o l(cid:146)sor (cid:149)qor lpoqe(cid:148) ma heyqghe(cid:148) amtipqosypeutij(cid:149)r tgr pqacla- tij(cid:147)r t(cid:145)sgr tgr acoq(cid:145)r· (cid:149)ti dem kalb(cid:145)momtai up(cid:149)xg pkgqovoq(cid:148)er (cid:149)tam to elp(cid:149)- qeula dem e(cid:148)mai uci(cid:146)r, am(cid:149)heuto jai s(cid:151)lvymo le ta sumak- kajtij(cid:145) (cid:147)hg (cid:147) (cid:149)tam g til(cid:147) pou amav(cid:146)qetai stgm pqosvoq(cid:145) (1) EE L 177 tgr 1. 7. 1981, s. 4. (2) EE L 206 tgr 16. 8. 1996, s. 43. (3) EE L 141 tgr 24. 6. 1995, s. 12. (4) EE L 145 tgr 27. 6. 1968, s. 12. dem avoq(cid:145) paq(cid:145) l(cid:149)mo l(cid:148)a lijq(cid:147) jai lg amtipqosypeutij(cid:147) pos(cid:149)tgta tgr acoq(cid:145)r· (cid:149)ti, ep(cid:148)sgr, pq(cid:146)pei ma apojkeisho(cid:151)m oi til(cid:146)r pqosvoq(cid:145)r pou lpoqo(cid:151)m ma heyqgho(cid:151)m lg amti- pqosypeutij(cid:146)r tgr pqaclatij(cid:147)r t(cid:145)sgr tgr acoq(cid:145)r· (cid:149)ti, cia ma kgvho(cid:151)m sucjq(cid:148)sila stoiwe(cid:148)a le tg lek(cid:145)ssa tou poiotijo(cid:151) t(cid:151)pou, pq(cid:146)pei oi til(cid:146)r, am(cid:145)koca le tgm poi(cid:149)tgta tgr pqosveq(cid:149)lemgr lek(cid:145)ssar, ma aun(cid:145)momtai (cid:147) ma lei(cid:150)momtai se sum(cid:145)qtgsg le ta apotek(cid:146)slata tgr evaq- loc(cid:147)r tou (cid:145)qhqou 6 tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EOJ) aqih. 785/68· (cid:149)ti l(cid:148)a amtipqosypeutij(cid:147) til(cid:147) lpoqe(cid:148) ma diatgqghe(cid:148) jat’ ena(cid:148)qesgm alet(cid:145)bkgtg jat(cid:145) tg di(cid:145)qjeia liar peqioqisl(cid:146)mgr peqi(cid:149)dou, ev(cid:149)som g til(cid:147) pqosvoq(cid:145)r pou apot(cid:146)kese b(cid:145)sg cia tom pqogco(cid:151)lemo jahoqisl(cid:149) tgr amtipqosypeutij(cid:147)r til(cid:147)r dem up(cid:146)pese stgm amt(cid:148)kgxg tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r jai ev(cid:149)som oi diah(cid:146)siler til(cid:146)r pqosvoq(cid:145)r, oi opo(cid:148)er dem va(cid:148)metai ma e(cid:148)mai aqjo(cid:151)mtyr amtipqosypeutij(cid:146)r tgr pqaclatij(cid:147)r t(cid:145)sgr tgr acoq(cid:145)r, ha odgco(cid:151)sam se ap(cid:149)toler jai sglamtij(cid:146)r letabok(cid:146)r tgr amtipqosypeutij(cid:147)r til(cid:147)r· (cid:149)ti, ev(cid:149)som up(cid:145)qwei l(cid:148)a diavoq(cid:145) letan(cid:151) tgr til(cid:147)r emeqco- po(cid:148)gsgr cia to em k(cid:149)cy pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)m jai tgr amtipqosypeutij(cid:147)r til(cid:147)r, pq(cid:146)pei ma jahoqisto(cid:151)m pq(cid:149)shetoi daslo(cid:148) jat(cid:145) tgm eisacyc(cid:147) le tour (cid:149)qour pou pqobk(cid:146)pomtai sto (cid:145)qhqo 3 tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 1422/95· (cid:149)ti, se peq(cid:148)ptysg ama- stok(cid:147)r tym dasl(cid:150)m jat(cid:145) tgm eisacyc(cid:147), se evaqloc(cid:147) tou (cid:145)qhqou 5 tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 1422/95, pq(cid:146)pei ma jahoqisho(cid:151)m idia(cid:148)teqa pos(cid:145) ci’ auto(cid:151)r tour daslo(cid:151)r· (cid:149)ti g evaqloc(cid:147) aut(cid:150)m tym diat(cid:145)neym sumep(cid:145)cetai tom jahoqisl(cid:149) tym amtipqosypeutij(cid:150)m til(cid:150)m jai tym pq(cid:149)- shetym dasl(cid:150)m jat(cid:145) tgm eisacyc(cid:147) tym em k(cid:149)cy pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mtym s(cid:151)lvyma le to paq(cid:145)qtgla tou paq(cid:149)mtor jamomislo(cid:151)· (cid:149)ti ta l(cid:146)tqa pou pqobk(cid:146)pomtai stom paq(cid:149)mta jamomisl(cid:149) e(cid:148)mai s(cid:151)lvyma le tg cm(cid:150)lg tgr epitqop(cid:147)r diawe(cid:148)qisgr f(cid:145)waqgr, ENEDYSE TOM PAQOMTA JAMOMISLO: (cid:129)qhqo 1 Oi amtipqosypeutij(cid:146)r til(cid:146)r jai oi pq(cid:149)shetoi daslo(cid:148) pou evaql(cid:149)fomtai jat(cid:145) tgm eisacyc(cid:147) tym pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mtym pou ama- v(cid:146)qomtai sto (cid:145)qhqo 1 tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 1422/95 jahoq(cid:148)fomtai s(cid:151)lvyma le to paq(cid:145)qtgla. (cid:129)qhqo 2 O paq(cid:150)m jamomisl(cid:149)r aqw(cid:148)fei ma isw(cid:151)ei stir 23 Apqik(cid:148)ou 1998. L 120/4 EL Ep(cid:148)sglg Evgleq(cid:148)da tym Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:150)m Joimot(cid:147)tym 23. 4. 98 O paq(cid:150)m jamomisl(cid:149)r e(cid:148)mai desleutij(cid:149)r yr pqor (cid:149)ka ta l(cid:146)qg tou jai isw(cid:151)ei (cid:145)lesa se j(cid:145)he jq(cid:145)tor l(cid:146)kor. Bqun(cid:146)kker, 22 Apqik(cid:148)ou 1998. Cia tgm Epitqop(cid:147) Franz FISCHLER L(cid:146)kor tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r PAQAQTGLA tou jamomislo(cid:151) cia tom jahoqisl(cid:149) tym amtipqosypeutij(cid:150)m til(cid:150)m jai tym pos(cid:150)m tym pq(cid:149)shetym dasl(cid:150)m pou evaql(cid:149)fomtai jat(cid:145) tgm eisacyc(cid:147) lek(cid:145)ssar stom tol(cid:146)a tgr f(cid:145)waqgr Jydij(cid:149)r SO Pos(cid:149) tgr amtipqosypeutij(cid:147)r til(cid:147)r se Ecu am(cid:145) 100 wiki(cid:149)cqalla jahaqo(cid:151) b(cid:145)qour tou em k(cid:149)cy pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mtor Pos(cid:149) tou pq(cid:149)shetou daslo(cid:151) se Ecu am(cid:145) 100 wiki(cid:149)cqalla jahaqo(cid:151) b(cid:145)qour tou em k(cid:149)cy pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mtor Pos(cid:149) tou daslo(cid:151) pou pq(cid:146)pei ma evaql(cid:149)fetai k(cid:149)cy tgr eisacyc(cid:147)r se peq(cid:148)ptysg amastok(cid:147)r, g opo(cid:148)a pqobk(cid:146)petai sto (cid:145)qhqo 5 tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 1422/95 se Ecu am(cid:145) 100 wiki(cid:149)cqalla jahaqo(cid:151) b(cid:145)qour tou em k(cid:149)cy pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mtor (2) 1703 10 00 (1) 1703 90 00 (1) 7,07 8,34 0,01 (cid:190) (cid:190) 0,00 (1) Jahoqisl(cid:149)r cia tom poiotij(cid:149) t(cid:151)po (cid:149)pyr jahoq(cid:148)fetai sto (cid:145)qhqo 1 tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EOJ) aqih. 785/68, (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi(cid:147)hgje. (2) To pos(cid:149) aut(cid:149), s(cid:151)lvyma le to (cid:145)qhqo 5 tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 1422/95, amtijahist(cid:145) to dasl(cid:149) tou joimo(cid:151) tekymeiajo(cid:151) daslokoc(cid:148)ou pou avoq(cid:145) ta pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mta aut(cid:145)


title: Feiten over de Europese Unie.

eurovoc_concepts:
EU institution
EU policy
European Communities
European integration
activity report
competence of the institution
foreign policy