title: Κανονισμός (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1680/98 της Επιτροπής της 29ης Ιουλίου 1998 σχετικά με την τροποποίηση του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 936/97 για το άνοιγμα και τον τρόπο διαχείρισης των δασμολογικών ποσοστώσεων για τα βόεια κρέατα εκλεκτής ποιότητας, νωπά, διατηρημένα με απλή ψύξη ή κατεψυγμένα και για το κατεψυγμένο κρέας βουβάλου και του κανονισμού (ΕΟΚ) αριθ. 139/81 περί καθορισμού των όρων από τους οποίους εξαρτάται η υπαγωγή ορισμένων κατεψυγμένων βοείων κρεάτων στη διάκριση 0202 30 50 της συνδυασμένης ονοματολογίας

eurovoc_concepts:
beef
buffalo meat
fresh meat
frozen product
product quality
tariff quota

formats: html pdf print

text: L 212/36 EL Ep(cid:148)sglg Evgleq(cid:148)da tym Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:150)m Joimot(cid:147)tym 30. 7. 98 JAMOMISLOS (EJ) aqih. 1680/98 TGS EPITQOPGS tgr 29gr Iouk(cid:148)ou 1998 swetij(cid:145) le tgm tqopopo(cid:148)gsg tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 936/97 cia to (cid:145)moicla jai tom tq(cid:149)po diawe(cid:148)qisgr tym daslokocij(cid:150)m posost(cid:150)seym cia ta b(cid:149)eia jq(cid:146)ata ejkejt(cid:147)r poi(cid:149)tgtar, myp(cid:145), diatgqgl(cid:146)ma le apk(cid:147) x(cid:151)ng (cid:147) jatexucl(cid:146)ma jai cia to jatexucl(cid:146)mo jq(cid:146)ar boub(cid:145)kou jai tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EOJ) aqih. 139/81 peq(cid:148) jahoqislo(cid:151) tym (cid:149)qym ap(cid:149) tour opo(cid:148)our enaqt(cid:145)tai g tgr upacyc(cid:147) oqisl(cid:146)mym jatexucl(cid:146)mym boe(cid:148)ym jqe(cid:145)tym stg di(cid:145)jqisg 0202 30 50 sumduasl(cid:146)mgr omolatokoc(cid:148)ar G EPITQOPG TYM EUQYPA(cid:136)JYM JOIMOTGTYM, (cid:130)womtar up(cid:149)xg: tg sumh(cid:147)jg cia tgm (cid:148)dqusg tgr Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:147)r Joim(cid:149)tgtar, tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 936/97 tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r, tgr 27gr La(cid:155)ou 1997, cia to (cid:145)moicla jai tom tq(cid:149)po diawe(cid:148)qisgr tym daslokocij(cid:150)m posost(cid:150)seym cia ta b(cid:149)eia jq(cid:146)ata ejkejt(cid:147)r poi(cid:149)tgtar, myp(cid:145), diatgqgl(cid:146)ma le apk(cid:147) x(cid:151)ng g jatexuc- l(cid:146)ma jai cia to jatexucl(cid:146)mo jq(cid:146)ar boub(cid:145)kou (1), (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi(cid:147)hgje tekeuta(cid:148)a ap(cid:149) tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 1299/98 (2), jai id(cid:148)yr to (cid:145)qhqo 7 paq(cid:145)cqavor 2, tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 805/68 tou Sulbouk(cid:148)ou, tgr 27gr Ioum(cid:148)ou 1968, peq(cid:148) joim(cid:147)r oqcam(cid:150)seyr acoq(cid:145)r stom tol(cid:146)a tou boe(cid:148)ou jq(cid:146)ator (3), (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi(cid:147)hgje tekeuta(cid:148)a ap(cid:149) tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 2634/97 (4), jai id(cid:148)yr to (cid:145)qhqo 9 paq(cid:145)cqavor 2, Ejtil(cid:150)mtar: (cid:149)ti g M(cid:146)a Fgkamd(cid:148)a (cid:149)qise m(cid:146)o oqcamisl(cid:149) (cid:146)jdosgr tym pistopoigtij(cid:150)m cmgsi(cid:149)tgtar· (cid:149)ti pq(cid:146)pei, epol(cid:146)myr, ma tqo- popoighe(cid:148) to paq(cid:145)qtgla II tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 936/97· (cid:149)ti g eisacyc(cid:147) oqisl(cid:146)mym boe(cid:148)ym jqe(cid:145)tym le leiyl(cid:146)mo sumtekest(cid:147) tekymeiajo(cid:151) daslo(cid:151) sto pka(cid:148)sio tou jamomi- slo(cid:151) (EOJ) aqih. 139/81 tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r (5), (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi- (cid:147)hgje tekeuta(cid:148)a ap(cid:149) tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 1299/98, enaqt(cid:145)tai ap(cid:149) tgm upobok(cid:147) tym pistopoigtij(cid:150)m cmgsi(cid:149)tg- tar pou ejd(cid:148)domtai ap(cid:149) tir emdiaveq(cid:149)lemer w(cid:150)qer· (cid:149)ti pq(cid:146)- pei ma emgleq(cid:150)momtai ta pistopoigtij(cid:145) aut(cid:145) le to (cid:149)mola jai tg die(cid:151)humsg tou oqcamislo(cid:151) (cid:146)jdosgr tgr M(cid:146)ar Fgkamd(cid:148)ar· (cid:149)ti pq(cid:146)pei ma emaqlomiste(cid:148) stg swetij(cid:147) molohes(cid:148)a g diadi- jas(cid:148)a cia tgm emdew(cid:149)lemg amahe(cid:150)qgsg tou jatak(cid:149)cou tym oqcamisl(cid:150)m (cid:146)jdosgr tym pistopoigtij(cid:150)m cmgsi(cid:149)tgtar· (cid:149)ti ta l(cid:146)tqa pou pqobk(cid:146)pomtai stom paq(cid:149)mta jamomisl(cid:149) e(cid:148)mai s(cid:151)lvyma le tg cm(cid:150)lg tgr epitqop(cid:147)r diawe(cid:148)qisgr boe(cid:148)ou jq(cid:146)ator, ENEDYSE TOM PAQOMTA JAMOMISLO: (cid:129)qhqo 1 Sto paq(cid:145)qtgla II tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 936/97, o oqcamisl(cid:149)r «New Zealand Meat Producers Board» amtijah(cid:148)statai ap(cid:149) tom oqcamisl(cid:149) «New Zealand Meat Board». omol(cid:145)fetai pou (cid:129)qhqo 2 O jamomisl(cid:149)r (EOJ) aqih. 139/81 tqopopoie(cid:148)tai yr en(cid:147)r: 1. To je(cid:148)lemo tou (cid:145)qhqou 5 paq(cid:145)cqavor 2 amtijah(cid:148)statai ap(cid:149) to aj(cid:149)kouho je(cid:148)lemo: O jat(cid:145)kocor lpoqe(cid:148) ma amaheyqghe(cid:148) ap(cid:149) tgm «2. Epitqop(cid:147) ev(cid:149)som o oqcamisl(cid:149)r (cid:146)jdosgr dem amacmyq(cid:148)fe- tai pk(cid:146)om, ev(cid:149)som dem pkgqo(cid:148) l(cid:148)a ap(cid:149) tir upowqe(cid:150)seir tir opo(cid:148)er (cid:146)wei amak(cid:145)bei (cid:147) ev(cid:149)som oqiste(cid:148) m(cid:146)or oqcami- sl(cid:149)r (cid:146)jdosgr. » 2. Sto paq(cid:145)qtgla II g omolas(cid:148)a «New Zealand Meat Producers Board» amtijah(cid:148)statai ap(cid:149) tgm omolas(cid:148)a «New Zealand Meat Board». (cid:129)qhqo 3 O paq(cid:150)m jamomisl(cid:149)r aqw(cid:148)fei ma isw(cid:151)ei tgm 1g Septelbq(cid:148)ou 1998. O paq(cid:150)m jamomisl(cid:149)r e(cid:148)mai desleutij(cid:149)r yr pqor (cid:149)ka ta l(cid:146)qg tou jai isw(cid:151)ei (cid:145)lesa se j(cid:145)he jq(cid:145)tor l(cid:146)kor. Bqun(cid:146)kker, 29 Iouk(cid:148)ou 1998. Cia tgm Epitqop(cid:147) Franz FISCHLER L(cid:146)kor tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r (1) EE L 137 tgr 28. 5. 1997, s. 10. (2) EE L 180 tgr 24. 6. 1998, s. 6. (3) EE L 148 tgr 28. 6. 1968, s. 24. (4) EE L 356 tgr 31. 12. 1997, s. 13. (5) EE L 15 tgr 17. 1. 1981, s. 4


title: ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟΣ (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1674/98 ΤΗΣ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗΣ της 29ης Ιουλίου 1998 για καθορισμό ορίων εντός των οποίων δύναται να γίνουν αποδεκτές οι αιτήσεις που υποβλήθηκαν τον Ιούλιο 1998 για πιστοποιητικά εισαγωγής για ορισμένα προϊόντα του τομέα των αυγών και του κρέατος πουλερικών στα πλαίσια των κανονισμών (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1474/95 και (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1251/96

eurovoc_concepts:
egg
import licence
poultrymeat

formats: pdf print

text: 30. 7. 98 EL Ep(cid:148)sglg Evgleq(cid:148)da tym Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:150)m Joimot(cid:147)tym L 212/13 JAMOMISLOS (EJ) aqih. 1674/98 TGS EPITQOPGS tgr 29gr Iouk(cid:148)ou 1998 cia jahoqisl(cid:149) oq(cid:148)ym emt(cid:149)r tym opo(cid:148)ym d(cid:151)matai ma c(cid:148)moum apodejt(cid:146)r oi ait(cid:147)seir pou upobk(cid:147)hgjam tom Io(cid:151)kio 1998 cia pistopoigtij(cid:145) eisacyc(cid:147)r cia oqisl(cid:146)ma pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mta tou tol(cid:146)a tym auc(cid:150)m jai tou jq(cid:146)ator poukeqij(cid:150)m sta pka(cid:148)sia tym jamomisl(cid:150)m (EJ) aqih. 1474/95 jai (EJ) aqih. 1251/96 G EPITQOPG TYM EUQYPA(cid:136)JYM JOIMOTGTYM, (cid:130)womtar up(cid:149)xg: tg sumh(cid:147)jg cia tgm (cid:148)dqusg tgr Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:147)r Joim(cid:149)tgtar, tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 1474/95 tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r (1), (cid:149)ti pq(cid:146)pei ma jahoqishe(cid:148) to pke(cid:149)masla pou pqost(cid:148)hetai stg diah(cid:146)silg pos(cid:149)tgta cia tgm ep(cid:149)lemg peq(cid:148)odo, cia to (cid:145)moicla jai tom tq(cid:149)po diawe(cid:148)qisgr tym daslokocij(cid:150)m posost(cid:150)seym stom tol(cid:146)a tym auc(cid:150)m jai tym yakbou- lim(cid:150)m, (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi(cid:147)hgje tekeuta(cid:148)a ap(cid:149) tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 1371/98 (2), jai id(cid:148)yr to (cid:145)qhqo 5 paq(cid:145)cqavor 5, tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 1251/96 tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r, tgr 28gr Ioum(cid:148)ou 1996, cia to (cid:145)moicla jai tom tq(cid:149)po diawe(cid:148)qisgr tym daslokocij(cid:150)m posost(cid:150)seym stom tol(cid:146)a tou jq(cid:146)ator pou- keqij(cid:150)m (3), (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi(cid:147)hgje tekeuta(cid:148)a ap(cid:149) tom jamomi- sl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 1370/98 (4), jai id(cid:148)yr to (cid:145)qhqo 5 paq(cid:145)cqa- vor 5, Ejtil(cid:150)mtar (cid:149)ti oi ait(cid:147)seir woqgc(cid:147)seyr pistopoigtij(cid:150)m eisacyc(cid:147)r pou upobk(cid:147)hgjam cia to tq(cid:148)to tq(cid:148)lgmo tou 1998, avoqo(cid:151)m cia oqisl(cid:146)ma pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mta pos(cid:149)tgter (cid:148)ser (cid:147) walgk(cid:149)- teqer ap(cid:149) tir diah(cid:146)siler pos(cid:149)tgter jai sumep(cid:150)r d(cid:151)mamtai ma ijamopoigho(cid:151)m pk(cid:147)qyr, jai, cia (cid:145)kka pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mta, am(cid:150)te- qer ap(cid:149) tir diah(cid:146)siler pos(cid:149)tgter jai pq(cid:146)pei sumep(cid:150)r ma leiyho(cid:151)m jat(cid:145) staheq(cid:149) posost(cid:149) cia ma up(cid:145)qnei ecc(cid:151)gsg d(cid:148)jaigr jatamol(cid:147)r, ENEDYSE TOM PAQOMTA JAMOMISLO: (cid:129)qhqo 1 Oi ait(cid:147)seir pistopoigtij(cid:150)m eisacyc(cid:147)r pou upob(cid:145)kko- 1. mtai cia tgm peq(cid:148)odo ap(cid:149) 1gr Iouk(cid:148)ou (cid:146)yr tir 30 Septel- bq(cid:148)ou 1998 b(cid:145)sei tym jamomisl(cid:150)m (EJ) aqih. 1474/95 jai (EJ) aqih. 1251/96 ha c(cid:148)moum apodejt(cid:146)r s(cid:151)lvyma le (cid:149)sa pqobk(cid:146)pomtai sto paq(cid:145)qtgla I. 2. Jat(cid:145) tg di(cid:145)qjeia tym d(cid:146)ja pq(cid:150)tym gleq(cid:150)m tgr peqi(cid:149)- dou ap(cid:149) 1gr Ojtybq(cid:148)ou (cid:146)yr tgm 31g Dejelbq(cid:148)ou 1998, oi ait(cid:147)seir adei(cid:150)m eisacyc(cid:147)r cia tir sumokij(cid:146)r pos(cid:149)tgter pou amav(cid:146)qomtai sto paq(cid:145)qtgla II pq(cid:146)pei ma upob(cid:145)kkomtai s(cid:151)lvyma le tour jamomislo(cid:151)r (EJ) aqih. 1474/95 jai (EJ) aqih. 1251/96. (cid:129)qhqo 2 O paq(cid:150)m jamomisl(cid:149)r aqw(cid:148)fei ma isw(cid:151)ei stir 30 Iouk(cid:148)ou 1998. O paq(cid:150)m jamomisl(cid:149)r e(cid:148)mai desleutij(cid:149)r yr pqor (cid:149)ka ta l(cid:146)qg tou jai isw(cid:151)ei (cid:145)lesa se j(cid:145)he jq(cid:145)tor l(cid:146)kor. Bqun(cid:146)kker, 29 Iouk(cid:148)ou 1998. Cia tgm Epitqop(cid:147) Franz FISCHLER L(cid:146)kor tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r (1) EE L 145 tgr 29. 6. 1995, s. 19. (2) EE L 185 tgr 30. 6. 1998, s. 17. (3) EE L 161 tgr 29. 6. 1996, s. 136. (4) EE L 185 tgr 30. 6. 1998, s. 15. L 212/14 EL Ep(cid:148)sglg Evgleq(cid:148)da tym Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:150)m Joimot(cid:147)tym 30. 7. 98 PAQAQTGLA I Ol(cid:145)da Posost(cid:149) (cid:146)cjqisgr upobkgh(cid:146)mtym pistopoigtij(cid:150)m eisacyc(cid:147)r cia tgm peq(cid:148)odo ap(cid:149) 1gr Iouk(cid:148)ou (cid:146)yr tir 30 Septelbq(cid:148)ou 1998 E1 E2 E3 P1 P2 P3 P4 (cid:190) 100,00 100,00 100,00 32,97 4,09 100,00 PAQAQTGLA II (se t(cid:149)mour) Ol(cid:145)da Sumokij(cid:147) diah(cid:146)silg pos(cid:149)tgta cia tgm peq(cid:148)odo ap(cid:149) 1gr Ojtybq(cid:148)ou (cid:146)yr tir 31 Dejelbq(cid:148)ou 1998 E1 E2 E3 P1 P2 P3 P4 54 560,00 1 919,80 5 609,82 1 840,00 600,00 117,00 210,00


title: Verorodening (EG) nr. 1671/98 van de Commissie van 29 juli 1998 tot vaststelling van het maximumbedrag van de restitutie bij uitvoer van witte suiker voor de 49e deelinschrijving in het kader van de inschrijving bedoeld in Verordening (EG) nr. 1408/97

eurovoc_concepts:
award of contract
export refund
white sugar

text: 30. 7. 98 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen L 212/7 VERORDENING (EG) Nr. 1671/98 VAN DE COMMISSIE van 29 juli 1998 tot vaststelling van het maximumbedrag van de restitutie bij uitvoer van witte suiker voor de 49e deelinschrijving in het kader van de inschrijving bedoeld in Verordening (EG) nr. 1408/97 DE COMMISSIE VAN DE EUROPESE GEMEENSCHAPPEN, Gelet op het Verdrag tot oprichting van de Europese Gemeenschap, Gelet op Verordening (EEG) nr. 1785/81 van de Raad van 30 juni 1981 houdende een gemeenschappelijke ordening der markten in de sector suiker (1), laatstelijk gewijzigd bij Verordening (EG) nr. 1148/98 (2), met name op artikel 17, lid 5, tweede alinea, onder b), ling van de suikermarkt in de Gemeenschap en daar- buiten; Overwegende dat na onderzoek van de offertes de in artikel 1 bedoelde bepalingen moeten worden vastgesteld voor de 49e deelinschrijving; Overwegende dat de in deze verordening vervatte maatre- gelen in overeenstemming zijn met het advies van het Comit(cid:130) van beheer voor suiker, Overwegende dat krachtens Verordening (EG) nr. 1408/97 van de Commissie van 22 juli 1997 betreffende een permanente van heffingen en/of restituties bij uitvoer van witte suiker (3) deelinschrijvingen worden gehouden voor de uitvoer van deze suiker; inschrijving vaststelling voor de Overwegende dat, overeenkomstig de bepalingen van artikel 9, lid 1, van Verordening (EG) nr. 1408/97 naar gelang van het geval, een maximumbedrag van de resti- tutie bij uitvoer wordt vastgesteld voor de betrokken deelinschrijving, waarbij met name rekening wordt gehouden met de situatie en de te verwachten ontwikke- HEEFT DE VOLGENDE VERORDENING VASTGESTELD: Artikel 1 Voor de 49e deelinschrijving voor witte suiker, gehouden krachtens Verordening (EG) nr. 1408/97, wordt het maxi- mumbedrag van de restitutie bij uitvoer vastgesteld op 47,050 ecu per 100 kg. Artikel 2 Deze verordening treedt in werking op 30 juli 1998. Deze verordening is verbindend in al haar onderdelen en is rechtstreeks toepassel¶k in elke lidstaat. Gedaan te Brussel, 29 juli 1998. Voor de Commissie Franz FISCHLER Lid van de Commissie (1) PB L 177 van 1. 7. 1981, blz. 4. (2) PB L 159 van 3. 6. 1998, blz. 38. (3) PB L 194 van 23. 7. 1997, blz. 16


title: 1999/184/ECSC: Commission Decision of 29 July 1998 on aid granted by Germany to the companies Sophia Jacoba GmbH and Preussag Anthrazit GmbH for 1996 and 1997 (notified under document number C(1998) 2476) (Only the German text is authentic)

eurovoc_concepts:
Germany
State aid
aid to undertakings
coal industry
competition
financial aid

text: L 60/74 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 9. 3. 1999 COMMISSION DECISION of 29 July 1998 on aid granted by Germany to the companies Sophia Jacoba GmbH and Preussag Anthrazit GmbH for 1996 and 1997 (notified under document number C(1998) 2476) (Only the German text is authentic) (1999/184/ECSC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community, and in particular Article 88 thereof, Having regard to Commission Decision No 3632/93/ ECSC of 28 December 1993 establishing Community rules for State aid to the coal industry (1), Whereas: I On 23 October 1996 and 5 November 1996 the British company Celtic Energy Ltd lodged two formal complaints with the Commission through the Office of the United Kingdom Permanent Representative to the European Union. Those complaints concern the German mining companies Sophia Jacoba GmbH and Preussag Anthrazit GmbH. By letters of 5 October 1995 and 30 September 1996, Germany notified the financial support it intended to grant for the years 1996 and 1997 in accordance with Article 9(1) of Commission Decision No 3632/93/ECSC. the Commission sent a letter of Following these complaints and its own subsequent in- formal vestigations, notice to Germany on 2 August 1997 in which it officially communicated the content of the complaints and asked for information concerning the actions of the companies and the German authorities. In its letter, the Commission also indicated the principles of law which might have been infringed by Germany and the companies Sophia Jacoba GmbH and Preussag Anthrazit GmbH. Germany replied to the letter of October 1997. formal notice on 6 The Commission invited comments from the other Member States and interested parties in a communication the European published in the Official Journal of Communities (2). Comments were received from the United Kingdom (letter of 23 September 1997), several competitor companies and the German coal producers, and duly forwarded to Germany. On 13 March 1998, 15 May 1998 and 12 June 1998 respectively, the companies Consolidated Coal plc, Evans & Reid Coal Co. , Ltd and Betws Anthracite Ltd also lodged complaints about the sale of German sized-anthra- cite in the Community market and more particularly in the United Kingdom. Preussag Anthrazit GmbH, for its part, sent the Commission a paper through a firm of solicitors setting out its position on the letter of formal notice. Since these complaints and the paper were forwarded to the Commission after the date set in the letter of formal notice and the Commission could not grant Germany further legal hearing, they were not taken into account for the purposes of this Decision. The complaints in question relate to the sale in 1996 and 1997 by Sophia Jacoba GmbH and Preussag Anthrazit GmbH of sized anthracite subsidised in the Community. The extremely favourable prices (compared with the production costs) offered by these companies on the in the United Community market Kingdom are said to have been possible only through the use of State aid paid by Germany under Decision No 3632/93/ECSC. This according to the complaint, covers a substantial part of the companies’ production costs, is said to have been used for an unau- thorised purpose. and primarily aid which, According to the complainant, such practices lead to distortions of competition in the Community anthracite market. In addition, the same product is sold in other Member States by the companies concerned at higher prices than in the United Kingdom. (1) OJ L 329, 30. 12. 1993, p. 12. (2) OJ C 258, 23. 8. 1997, p. 2. 9. 3. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 60/75 After examining Germany’s reply to the letter of formal notice and the comments by the other interested parties, the Commission considered that this reply did not consti- tute sufficient grounds, as will be explained in this Decision, to refrain from taking further action on the complaint. In the meantime, there were numerous meetings and contacts between the Commission and representatives of the companies and Member States concerned in order to analyse the problem in greater depth. The Commission also sent its representatives to the United Kingdom (26 to 30 January 1998) and Germany (10 and 11 February 1998) to meet the main representatives of the anthracite industry in Germany, Wales, England and Northern Ireland. The purpose of these meetings was, on the one hand, to ascertain the facts and in particular to assess the situation on the geographical markets most affected together with the manner in which the aid is being used and, on the other, to analyse the respective price policies and the legal arguments in order to determine whether the German aid is compatible with the common market. II The Community anthracite market mirrors fairly clearly the difficulties facing the Community coal industry: decline in demand, particularly in the household market, growing competition from imports from third countries and high production costs in certain production sectors, with substantial variations in costs between the individual production sectors. According to the information supplied by Germany and the United Kingdom, the average production costs of the main German anthracite producer, Preussag Anthrazit GmbH, amount to DEM 300 per tonne or ECU 152, compared with average costs of GBP 30, or ECU 43, for Celtic Energy Ltd, the main UK producer. This difference is largely due to the favourable geological conditions under which the UK producer can operate, whereas Preussag Anthrazit GmbH works coal at depths of up to 1 500 m. The production costs of DEM 373 for Sophia Jacoba GmbH in 1996 are not representative, as it ceased production in March 1997. Its production costs in 1995 amounted to DEM 307 per tonne. Anthracite has the highest carbon content of all types of coal. It is a high-grade, almost smokeless fuel with a low proportion of volatile components. It has a low flamm- ability, but gives off constant, intense heat. Because of these properties, it has always been highly suitable for use in industry and above all in the home. The raw anthracite undergoes several processing stages to separate the fines, a product of low commercial value (DEM 60 to 70 tonne) of particle size 0 to 5 mm, which accounts for around 60 % of pit production and at best finds a market in the power industry, from the nuts or sized anthracite. The latter accounts for 20 to 30 % of pit production, has a high commercial value (DEM 190/t) and is sold to industry and domestic households. Consequently, the marketing of anthracite traditionally concerned mainly sized anthracite. The market for sized anthracite is geographically limited to the traditional coalmining regions of the Community in Belgium, Germany, Spain, France and the United Kingdom. German anthracite has a good reputation in the Community market owing to the regularity of deliveries, the quality and the competitive prices. Deliveries to the United Kingdom began in 1971 in the case of Sophia Jacoba GmbH and in the middle of the seventies in the case of Preussag Anthrazit GmbH. The market in the United Kingdom for deliveries from Germany comprised the east of the country from the Humber to the south coast and — in the case of Sophia Jacoba GmbH — Northern Ireland. The two German companies were able to open up a market in the United Kingdom as the State-owned National Coal Board (subsequently British Coal) had done little prospecting for storage sites in these areas, and they offered very favourable prices. When the British Coal Corporation was privatised in 1994, Celtic Energy Ltd, a private company, took over several pits in Wales, most of which produce anthracite. Following the acquisition of these open-cast mines, Celtic Energy Ltd embarked on a completely new policy, as it decided to expand its business in England and opened a distribution centre for its products in Hull, the main British port of entry for German anthracite. As already mentioned, eastern England was traditionally the main market in Britain for Sophia Jacoba GmbH and Preussag Anthrazit GmbH. In order to capture part of the English market, Celtic its products in Energy Ltd decided in 1995 to sell England at the same prices as in Wales, which it was able to do by meeting the costs of transport. As a result, Sophia Jacoba GmbH and Preussag Anthrazit GmbH decided to lower their prices, triggering a process of mutual undercutting of prices which continued until the end of 1997. L 60/76 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 9. 3. 1999 investigations have shown that The Commission’s Preussag Anthrazit GmbH’s prices for anthracite in the United Kingdom were, at least in the period 1996-1997, systematically lower than the prices of the companies which succeeded the National Coal Board as reference producers within the meaning of Article 2 of Commission Decision No 72/443/ECSC of 22 December 1972 on alignment of prices for sales of coal in the common market (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden. In January 1996 the grade ‘beans' (Nuß IV) was on sale on the east coast of Britain at a price of GBP 93 per tonne from Preussag Anthrazit GmbH and GBP 101 per tonne from Celtic Energy Ltd. The prices in October 1997 for the same grade were GBP 94 and GBP 103. 40 respectively. By way of comparison, anthracite from the People’s Republic of China was being sold at GBP 94 in January 1996 and at GBP 102. 7 in October 1997. sized anthracite from both Preussag Anthrazit GmbH and Celtic Energy Ltd was selling for GBP 105, while the same product from China was selling for GBP 94. In 1995, Preussag Anthrazit GmbH offers major reductions on its list prices in the various Member States. A study by an independent expert shows that the lowest (pithead) prices charged by the company for sales in the United Kingdom in summer 1996 ranged from DEM 153 per tonne (Nuß IV) to DEM 183 per tonne (Nuß II) compared with (pithead) list prices of DEM 400 for sized anthracite of grade Nuß IV (14/23) and (Nuß II (37/55). By way of comparison, the pithead prices for grade (Nuß IV were around DEM 248 for deliveries to France, DEM 265 to Belgium and DEM 95 to Spain. In the case of Sophia Jacoba GmbH, Nuß V anthracite (6/14), which had a pithead list price of DEM 361 per sold in winter 1995/96 in the United tonne, was Kingdom at (pithead) prices of DEM 160 per tonne compared with DEM 202 per tonne (pithead price) for the same grade in France (2). Preussag Anthrazit GmbH’s the competition from the Welsh producers can be seen from the 1995 company report, which states that Welsh anthra- cite, which has reasserted itself on the market following the privatisation of British Coal, was a cause for concern about concern’ (3). Sophia Jacoba GmbH comes to the same conclusion in its 1995 company report (4). Furthermore, that the 1996 company report ‘Preussag Anthrazit GmbH was able to increase its market share on the home market and some foreign markets for household fuel by means of an elastic price policy' (5). states This policy proved effective in practice, as the informa- tion available shows that the company’s exports rose from 279 000 tonnes to 358 000 tonnes between 1995 and 1996, an increase of 20 %. Sales in the United Kingdom apparently increased by 49 % from 66 000 tonnes to 98 000 tonnes between 1995 and 1996. The cor- responding increase in France and Belgium was 13 % and 8 % respectively. In 1997 the volumes dropped to 68 000 tonnes and to zero at the beginning of 1998. Sophia Jacoba GmbH’s sales in the United Kingdom rose from 25 700 tonnes to 37 500 tonnes in 1996. According to the company, no deliveries were made in 1997, the year in which its only pit was closed. This growth in exports is all the more remarkable as it took place in difficult market conditions. Firstly, there is such as growing competition from third countries Vietnam, the People’s Republic of China or Russia, the quality of whose products is wholly acceptable for the Community market. Secondly, the main market for sized anthracite, i. e. house- holds, is very demanding. Although private consumers are loyal to their suppliers, they are attracted to cheaper, more user-friendly energy sources such as natural gas or fuel oil. It can be concluded from the above that the prospects for the Community sized-anthracite market are less than is in steep structural the market promising, and that decline. III In its letter of formal notice to Germany, the Commission expressed the view that Sophia Jacoba GmbH and Preussag Anthrazit GmbH pursued their corporate policy on the market for sized anthracite in the Community and more particularly in the United Kingdom with the aid of subsidies which were used indirectly for purposes not provided for in Commission Decision No 3632/93/ECSC and 96/560/ECSC of 30 April 1996 on German aid to the coal industry in 1995 and 1996 (6). (1) OJ L 297, 30. 12. 1972, p. 45. (2) The classification of sized anthracite ranges from a particle size of 5/12 mm (Nuß V, grains) to a particle size of 45/74 mm (large nuts). The category Nuß IV corresponds to a particle size from 10/15 to 14/22 mm. The designation Nuß II relates to a particle size from 30/50 mm to 35/55 mm. (3) Preussag Anthrazit, company report October 1994/September 1995, p. 13. (4) Sophia Jacoba GmbH, company report 1995, p. 5. (5) Preussag Anthrazit, company report October 1995/September 1996, p. 13. (6) OJ L 244, 25. 9. 1996, p. 15. 9. 3. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 60/77 The letter stressed that the interests of Celtic Energy Ltd, whose production is clearly more competitive, could be damaged by the competition from Sophia Jacoba GmbH and Preussag Anthrazit GmbH. The two latter companies’ conduct could be seen as infringing the second paragraph of Article 2 of the ECSC Treaty, according to which the Community ‘shall progressively bring about conditions which will of rational distribution of production at the highest possible level of regarded as productivity'. Their infringing Article 3(b) and (g) of the ECSC Treaty. Furthermore, Article 4(b) of the ECSC Treaty states that the application by a seller of dissimilar conditions to comparable transactions is prohibited pursuant to the second indent of Article 60(1) of the ECSC Treaty, par- ticularly if buyers are treated differently on grounds of nationality. themselves ensure the most could be conduct The Commission reasoned that the aid, which according to Germany was aid to the marketing of coal for power is in reality aid to secure the companies’ generation, their fixed survival by covering a substantial part of production costs. It also took the view that this aid in actual fact benefited the whole of production. Production as a whole would no longer be competitive if the aid ceased, irrespective of the market on which the individual products were sold. The Commission considered Germany’s distinction between subsidised and non-subsidised production, depending on the market for the anthracite, to be artifi- cial and unfounded, and that it facilitated, through State aid, pricing which did not cover production costs. In its reply to the letter of formal notice, Germany addressed the cross-subsidies argument, contending that the aid was granted to support sales of coal for power generation and to the steel industry, and that deliveries to other consumption sectors were not subsidised at all. Germany stresses that the subsidies under the Fifth Law on coal for power generation (1) are intended to cover the difference between production costs and the price of coal from third countries. the the justifies conduct of Germany companies concerned, without providing supporting evidence, by arguing that it can make economic sense to maintain or expand production temporarily beyond the volume that can be sold without incurring a loss. If, according to Germany, the resulting additional production leads to a reduction in the average costs of overall production, the additional output can bring about an improvement in the (1) BGBl. 1995 I, p. 1638. It further argues the results of average costs. comparing the average costs of overall production with the sales proceeds in the British market will be misleading unless account is taken of this context. that On the basis of the information supplied by Germany, the Commission notes that 1. 1 million tonnes of sized coal were sold in the Community in 1996 and 770 000 tonnes in 1997 at prices which did not cover the average production costs. The average price of the sized anthracite sold by Sophia Jacoba GmbH and Preussag Anthrazit GmbH in the Community is in fact some DEM 100 per tonne lower than the average costs of production as a whole. With regard to the argument that it is in a company’s interests to produce as long as the prices cover the vari- able costs and possibly also a proportion — however small — of the fixed costs, the Commission considers that, in applying this marginal costs principle, Germany is explicitly acknowledging that most, if not all, of the fixed costs are covered by that part of the output whose sales proceeds cover the costs of production, i. e. by the anthracite fines (2,3 million tonnes in 1996 and 1,4 million tonnes in 1997), which according to Germany is the only production sector in receipt of aid. The Commission considers that the proceeds of sales overall, whether of fines or sized coal, would not cover the costs of production without the subsidies. The companies’ sales as a whole have been running up losses for several years owing to the high level of production costs. Ger- many’s contention that the production costs are covered by the proceeds is explained by the fact that the accounts do not make a clear distinction between the companies’ earnings and State aid. In other words, the companies treat the aid as part of their turnover and do not distin- guish between the consumption sectors, regardless of whether they are subsidised or — as Germany claims in the case of the industrial and household sectors — non- subsidised. Preussag Anthrazit GmbH’s profit and loss account for the 1997 financial year shows sales revenue of DEM 530,27 million (2), in which more than DEM 270 million in aid is included. The company report for 1996 gives turnover of DEM 473,74 million, but the breakdown of sales revenue in point 12 of the appendix to the profit and loss account gives no indication — as for the 1997 financial year — of the aid totalling DEM 278 million authorised by the Commission for 1996. The sales (2) Annual accounts and notifications of deposit, Annex to the Federal Gazette No 85 of 8 May 1998. L 60/78 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 9. 3. 1999 revenue of Preussag Anthrazit GmbH based on actual turnover for 1996 and 1997 therefore amounts to only DEM 200 million and 260 million respectively. The Commission refers in this connection to Article 2(3) of Decision No 3632/93/ECSC, according to which all aid received by undertakings must be shown together with their profit and loss accounts as a separate receipt, distinct from turnover. Germany has not complied with this requirement and thus infringed the principle of transpar- ency and use of aid for its intended purpose. the reduction of activity, Article 3 concerns aid for provides for the continuation of production for an inde- terminate period on the basis of improved economic viability in view of the conditions prevailing on the world market. If, as Germany maintains, the companies had refrained from taking all permissible measures to preserve their assets, which, in view of the foregoing, would be a policy amounting to their closure, this would conflict with its notification of the aid to Preussag Anthrazit GmbH for 1996 and 1997 as operating aid pursuant to Article 3 of Decision No 3632/93/ECSC. under operating competitive The marginal costs argument may appear conclusive for a company conditions; however, it no longer holds good where a company covers more than 50 % of the costs of its overall production from State aid, and virtually all fixed costs are borne exclusively by the production which, according to Germany, is subsidised. Were there to be effects of scale as Germany claims, they would be possible only because of the subsidies. Moreover, the level of subsidy is so great that the company would have to close immediately if the subsidies ceased. argument Germany’s according to which Preussag Anthrazit GmbH covers the fixed costs of its allegedly non-subsidised production from other resources, leading to an erosion of therefore unfounded and also difficult to square with the profits for 1996 and 1997. It does not appear logical either that the company could have an interest in operating its entire production at a loss. the company’s assets, is is not Since the loss-bringing sale of anthracite, which Germany claims subsidised, concerns a relatively large volume of production and has been going on for several years, and since it is unlikely that the ratio of market improve in future, the prices to production costs will Commission considers that such a practice is possible only because Germany keeps the company viable with State aid. This view is corroborated by the fact that Germany noti- fies the aid for Preussag Anthrazit GmbH under Article 3 of Decision No 3632/93/ECSC. Unlike Article 4, which As already mentioned, on examining Preussag Anthrazit GmbH’s profit and loss accounts for 1996 and 1997 the Commission found an annual surplus of DEM 12,59 million and DEM 39,72 million respectively, despite losses from the allegedly non-subsidised sales of DEM 65 million in 1997 and DEM 56,6 million in 1996. Germany also claims that the aid is compatible with Decision No 3632/93/ECSC, as it forms part of a national programme to secure energy supplies, which contributes to improved security of supply in Germany and the Community, and the Decision explicitly authorises such measures. The Commission would stress in this context that the Decision makes no such provision, and this objective cannot therefore be used as a criterion for authorising aid. Reliance on this criterion would also conflict with the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 2 of the ECSC Treaty. It is clear from the above that the State aid granted under Decision No 3632/93/ECSC and 96/560/ECSC enabled the beneficiary companies to sell sized anthracite at prices which do not cover the costs of production, and that these sales in part conflict with the provisions of Article 2 and of Article 4(b) of the ECSC Treaty. Germany states that the aid is calculated on the basis of the average costs of overall production, determined in accordance with the guidelines for company accounts in the coal industry (RBS) (1). It explains that this approach is appropriate as the different types and grades of coal can only be produced simultaneously (co-production) and the costs consequently cannot be calculated by marketing sector (power generation and heating), so that any alloca- tion of costs (e. g. according to technical or profitability criteria) would ultimately be arbitrary. According to Germany, cost components cannot be shifted between the different market sectors in this system. The point of departure for calculating the aid is the average costs of overall production. (1) Issued by the General Association of the German Coal In- dustry. 9. 3. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 60/79 The Commission’s view is that the anthracite fines and the sized anthracite are co-products owing to the homo- geneous nature of the unprocessed product and the undif- ferentiated production costs. The considerable difference in the commercial value of the two products, which can be as much as 500 %, should basically favour a method of cost allocation which takes account not only of the quant- ities produced, but also of the market value of products of such divergent quality as anthracite fines and sized the average pithead prices anthracite. In actual charged by the two German companies concerned are DEM 60 to 70 per tonne for anthracite fines and DEM 190 per tonne for sized anthracite. fact, differently on grounds of nationality, is prohibited under the second indent of Article 60(1) of the ECSC Treaty and therefore infringes Article 4(b). With regard to the alignment mechanism provided for in Article 60(2) of the ECSC Treaty, the Commission found in its letter of formal notice that the direct or indirect use of State aid for the purpose of systematic alignment of a product price on the prices of producers not receiving aid, cannot be considered to be in conformity with the ECSC Treaty. The Commission considers that allocating costs purely on a volume basis without distinguishing between the two products, which results in average costs of over DEM 300 per tonne, gives a disproportionate weight to the book costs of the (low-value) anthracite fines, because account is not taken of the commercial value of the products based on their physical properties. As a result, the volume of aid is set too high. As already demonstrated, Sophia Jacoba GmbH and Preussag Anthrazit GmbH could not in the long term have maintained their price policy, consisting in selling sized anthracite in the United Kingdom at different prices from those in the other Member States and at prices below those of the British producers of sized anthracite, without the aid granted under Decision No 3632/93/ECSC. It could be deduced from this that a system of cost allocation based on the respective contribution of the products to turnover calculated in terms of market prices, which would take account of the unit value of the prod- ucts and not only of volume, would create a more logical relationship between the unit costs, the commercial value of the products and the necessary subsidies. Germany’s argument regarding the protection of legit- imate expectations is not applicable here, as the Commis- sion’s decisions require a Member State to ensure that it honours its commitments, without specifying how this is to be done. The Commission never intimated that the cost allocation system used in Germany is sufficient proof of aid being used for the intended purpose. Consequently, in the event of improper use of aid, neither Germany nor the companies concerned can plead the protection of legitimate expectations in respect of a requirement to repay aid on grounds that the Commission did not act. IV The Commission noted in its letter of formal notice that the application of dissimilar conditions to comparable transactions by a seller, particularly if buyers are treated Germany argues that High Authority Decision No 30/53 of 2 May 1953 on practices prohibited by Article 60(1) of the Treaty in the common market for coal and steel (1), as last amended by Commission Decision No 1834/81/ ECSC (2), and Decision 72/443/ECSC do not make the authorisation to align prices conditional on the com- panies not receiving any aid. Germany also argues that a general ban on price alignment for companies in receipt of State aid should have been enshrined in the above Decisions. The Commission considers that the use of aid granted pursuant to Decision No 3632/93/ECSC to align prices on those of competitors within the meaning of Article 60(2) of the ECSC Treaty is not provided for in the Decision and does not contribute to the achievement of any of the objectives set out in Article 2(1) thereof. Section III of the preamble to Decision No 3632/93/ ECSC states that the objectives of the Decision must be achieved with strict adherence to the rules of competition in order to avoid distortion of competition and discrim- ination between coal producers, purchasers or consumers in the Community as a result of the aid. By the same token, the fourth paragraph of Section I of the preamble stresses that the aid rules must be in the common interest and in no way disturb the functioning of the common market. (1) OJ 6, 4. 5. 1953, p. 109/53. (2) OJ L 184, 4. 7. 1981, p. 7. L 60/80 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 9. 3. 1999 It is worth pointing out that the ECSC Treaty provides for a total ban on aid as a fundamental principle, although price alignment is permitted (Article 60 ff). Furthermore, the Commission’s decisions on State aid to the coal industry relate exclusively to the principle of non- discrimination between buyers (Article 4(b)) and not to Article 60 ff and the price alignment rules. It is normal practice for the Commission, in its decisions on State aid, to impose conditions relating to the conduct of the recipi- ents in order to limit any distortions of competition. Finally, contrary to the Commission’s position, Germany considers that Article 4(b) of the ECSC Treaty cannot be applied simultaneously with Article 60(2) of the Treaty. Germany refers in this connection to the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in Case C-128/92 Banks v British Coal (1). It is true that, according to the case law of the Court of Justice, Article 4(b) can be applied independently only if more specific rules are lacking; if these rules have been incorporated in other provisions of the Treaty or if they are specified there in greater detail, the texts relating to one and the same rule must be viewed as a whole and applied simultaneously. The ‘more specific rules' in this case concern decisions on State aid to the coal industry, which refer only to Article 4(b) and specifically exclude any discrimination between purchasers and consumers in order to minimise any distortion of competition because of the aid, but which in line with this reasoning do not permit the aid to be used for price alignment. The price alignment mechanism is, moreover, closely linked to the sale of production on the Community market. As Decision No 3632/93/ECSC does not provide for aid to marketing, it cannot be quoted in defence of alignment of prices on those of Community competitors. Anthrazit GmbH at least did not adhere to the alignment rules. Even though the company could in theory cite these rules as a possible defence, its actual conduct in terms of how it used the State aid in practice is not in conformity with the common market. In its letter of formal notice to Germany, the Commission the explained the grounds corporate policy of Sophia Jacoba GmbH and Preussag Anthrazit GmbH could result in the application of dissimilar conditions to comparable transactions. the assumption that for Germany replied that market and competitive conditions in the common market vary over time and from one region to another. Furthermore, the offers related to prod- ucts of differing grade. Germany therefore considered that the sales of anthracite by Sophia Jacoba GmbH and Preussag Anthrazit GmbH in the different Member States were not comparable. Article 2(1) of Decision No 30/53 states that the applica- tion by a seller in the common market of dissimilar conditions to comparable transactions is to be regarded as a prohibited practice within the meaning of Article 60(1) of the Treaty. The preamble to Decision No 3632/93/ ECSC states that State aid may not cause any discrim- ination between coal purchasers or consumers in the Community. The Commission has found from its investigations that there are substantial price differences between products of the same quality and with the same delivery times sold in the various Member States by Sophia Jacoba GmbH and Preussag Anthrazit GmbH. The magnitude of these price differences cannot be explained by differences in freight costs alone. Furthermore, a rule which was created to ensure market transparency and compliance with the provisions of the ECSC Treaty cannot be invoked in order to infringe the very principles which it sets out to protect. According to Article 3 of Decision No 30/53, transactions are comparable within the meaning of Article 60(1) where they are concluded with purchasers exercising the same commercial function and they concern identical or similar products whose other essential commercial prop- erties do not significantly differ. the Commission’s view that Finally, the beneficiaries cannot rely on the price alignment rules is not based on the above legal considerations alone. It also notes that, with regard to the main point of the complaint, Preussag (1) [1994] ECR I-1209. Germany also contends that the company Sophia Jacoba GmbH and the sellers of sized anthracite from Preussag Anthrazit GmbH have been practising price alignment for their exports to the British market for years, but never undercut the market never occurred. their competitors so that distortion of 9. 3. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 60/81 that companies The Commission would point out wishing to use the price alignment mechanism are required to notify the Commission in the manner prescribed in Article 60(2) of the ECSC Treaty and the the two companies, derived legislation, which one of Preussag Anthrazit GmbH, failed to do. compatible with the common market and has not been used improperly. With regard to the conduct of the sellers of the sized anthracite produced by Preussag Anthrazit GmbH, to which Germany refers, Article 7, second paragraph, of Decision No 30/53 states that undertakings are to be responsible for infringements by their agents, selling the agencies or Commission agents. responsibility for the price alignment cited by Germany with regard to sales by Preussag Anthrazit GmbH lies entirely with that company. follows that It the that considers The Commission therefore aid amounting to DEM 99,5 million which it authorised for 1996 in Decision 96/560/ECSC, of which DEM 42,9 million went to Sophia Jacoba GmbH and DEM 56,6 million to Preussag Anthrazit GmbH, was used to support the production and sale of anthracite for the industrial and household sectors and that the prices charged did not cover the production costs. As already explained, it emerges from the information available to the Commission that that company undercut its competitors’ prices. Furthermore, since the price alignment cited by the company in its defence was not notified, the Commission was unable to take the measures provided for in the final subparagraph of Article 60(2). It the is clear from the Commission’s investigations, volumes of anthracite sold and the prices charged that part of this aid — DEM 13,55 million, i. e. DEM 3,75 million for Sophia Jacoba GmbH and DEM 9,8 million for Preussag Anthrazit GmbH — led to distortion of competition incompatible with the common market in the Community market for sized anthracite for industry and households, in contravention of Decision No 3632/ therefore 93/ECSC. The companies in question must repay those amounts to Germany. The Commission considers that the discrimination found comes under Article 4 of the ECSC Treaty and cannot be justified by the price alignment rules. By using the aid for the purposes described, the companies have infringed the specific conditions of Decision No 3632/93/ECSC and 96/560/ECSC, with the result that the aid cannot be considered compatible with the common market. V The ruling by the Court of Justice in Case C-364/90 Italy v Commission (1) established the principle that the burden of proof of the compatibility of aid lies with the Member State seeking to apply the derogation. In the light of the arguments advanced by Germany and the beneficiaries of the Commission’s finding that the companies had failed to provide proof that the aid had been used properly and of the companies’ price conduct, the Commission was unable to dispel the doubts explained in the letter of formal notice regarding the compatibility of the aid and to conclude that the aid is Pursuant to Article l of Commission Decision 98/687/ ECSC of 10 June 1998 on German aid to the coal industry for 1997 (2), the Commission has postponed its decision on operating aid of DEM 65 million to Preussag Anthrazit GmbH pursuant to Article 3 of Decision No 3632/93/ECSC and aid for the reduction of activity of DEM 12 million to Sophia Jacoba GmbH pursuant to Article 4 of total aid of DEM 77 million. By reserving its decision on those aid payments, the Commission has made clear its belief that those sums support the production of anthracite for the industrial and household sectors in the Community and its sale at prices which do not cover the production costs. that Decision, i. e. The Commission’s investigations have shown that part of that aid, namely DEM 6,8 million for Preussag Anthrazit led to distortion of competition incompatible GmbH, with the common market in the Community market for sized anthracite for industry and households, in breach of Decision No 3632/93/ECSC. As the aid in 1997 was paid in anticipation of a Commission decision, Germany must require the company concerned to repay the sum of DEM 6,8 million pursuant to Article 9(5) of the Decision. (1) [1993] ECR- I-2097. (2) OJ L 324, 2. 12. 1998, p. 30. L 60/82 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 9. 3. 1999 The balance of the aid intended for Sophia Jacoba GmbH and Preussag Anthrazit GmbH for 1997 (DEM 70,2 million) can be regarded as compatible with the objectives of Decision No 3632/93/ECSC, in particular Articles 3 and 4 thereof, in view of the justification based on those Articles given in the annual decisions approving Ger- many’s measures in support of the coal industry. On the basis of the principle put forward by Germany that aid payments are to be limited to coal production destined for power generation and the Community steel industry, Germany undertakes to ensure that sales of sized anthracite in the industrial and household sectors will be made at prices which cover the costs of production, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Article 1 The aid amounting to DEM 3,75 million to Sophia Jacoba GmbH and DEM 9,8 million to Preussag Anthrazit GmbH granted by Germany pursuant to Decision 96/560/ECSC was used improperly in breach of that Decision. Article 2 The aid of DEM 70. 2 million to the coal industry paid by Germany for 1997 in anticipation of a Commission decision pursuant to Articles 3 and 4 of Decision No 3632/93/ECSC, namely operating aid of DEM 58,2 to Preussag Anthrazit GmbH pursuant to Article 3 of the Decision and aid of DEM 12 million to Sophia Jacoba GmbH pursuant to Article 4 of the Decision, is hereby authorised. Aid of DEM 6,8 million paid by Germany to Preussag Anthrazit GmbH in anticipation of a Commission decision was used improperly in breach of Decision No 3632/93/ECSC. Article 3 Germany shall recover the amounts referred to in Article 1 and the second paragraph of Article 2 from the benefi- ciary companies. Repayment shall be made in accordance with the proced- ures and rules of German law concerning liabilities to the State, with interest at the reference rate used in the assess- ment of regional aid, from the time the aid was paid until repayment in full. Article 4 inform the Commission within two Germany shall months after notification of this Decision of the measures it has taken to comply with this Decision. Article 5 When making the annual statement of aid actually paid in accordance with this Decision, Germany shall supply all the information pursuant to Article 9(3) of Decision No 3632/93/ECSC which is necessary in order to verify the criteria of Articles 3 and 4 of that Decision and to verify compliance with the present Decision. Article 6 This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany. Done at Brussels, 29 July 1998. For the Commission Monika WULF-MATHIES Member of the Commission


title: Reglamento (CE) n° 1675/98 de la Comisión de 29 de julio de 1998 por el que se determina la proporción en que se satisfarán las solicitudes de certificados de importación de algunos productos del sector de la carne de aves de corral presentadas en el mes de julio de 1998 al amparo del Reglamento (CE) n° 509/97

eurovoc_concepts:
import licence
poultrymeat

text: 30. 7. 98 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas L 212/15 REGLAMENTO (CE) No 1675/98 DE LA COMISIÓN de 29 de julio de 1998 por el que se determina la proporción en que se satisfarán las solicitudes de certificados de importación de algunos productos del sector de la carne de aves de corral presentadas en el mes de julio de 1998 al amparo del Reglamento (CE) no 509/97 LA COMISIÓN DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS, HA ADOPTADO EL PRESENTE REGLAMENTO: Visto el Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Europea, Visto el Reglamento (CE) no 509/97 de la Comisión, de 20 de marzo de 1997, por el que se establecen las disposi- ciones de aplicación en el sector de la carne de aves de corral, del régimen establecido en el Acuerdo interino sobre comercio y en las medidas de acompañamiento entre la Comunidad Europea, la Comunidad Europea del Carbón y del Acero y la Comunidad Europea de la Energía Atómica, por una parte, y la República de Eslo- venia, por otra (1) modificado por el Reglamento (CE) no 1514/97 (2), y, en particular, el apartado 5 de su artículo 4, Considerando que las solicitudes de certificados de importación presentadas para el tercer trimestre de 1998 son inferiores a las cantidades disponibles, por lo que pueden ser atendidas en su totalidad; Artículo 1 1. Las solicitudes de certificados de importación para el período comprendido entre el 1 de julio y el 30 de septiembre de 1998 presentadas al amparo del Regla- mento (CE) no 509/97 se satisfarán como se indica en el anexo I. 2. Durante los diez primeros días del período compren- dido entre el 1 de octubre y el 31 de diciembre de 1998 se podrán presentar, al amparo del Reglamento (CE) no 509/ 97, solicitudes de certificados de importación por las cantidades totales que figuran en el anexo II. Artículo 2 Considerando que conviene determinar el excedente que se añade a la cantidad disponible en el período siguiente, El presente Reglamento entrará en vigor el 30 de julio de 1998. El presente Reglamento será obligatorio en todos sus elementos y directamente aplicable en cada Estado miembro. Hecho en Bruselas, el 29 de julio de 1998. Por la Comisión Franz FISCHLER Miembro de la Comisión (1) DO L 80 de 21. 3. 1997, p. 3. (2) DO L 204 de 31. 7. 1997, p. 16. L 212/16 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 30. 7. 98 ANEXO I Porcentaje en que se satisfarán las solicitudes de certificados de importación presentadas en el período comprendido entre el 1 de julio y el 30 de septiembre de 1998 100,00 90,91 100,00 Número de grupo 80 90 100 ANEXO II Número de grupo Cantidades disponibles (en toneladas) 80 90 100 1 320,00 275,00 972,40


title: 98/511/EG: Kommissionens rekommendation av den 29 juli 1998 om ändring av rekommendation 98/195/EG om samtrafik på en avreglerad telekommunikationsmarknad (Del 1 - Prissättning vid samtrafik) [delgivet med nr K(1998) 2234] (Text av betydelse för EES)

eurovoc_concepts:
communications systems
liberalisation of the market
systems interconnection
telecommunications
telephone charges
transmission network

text: L 228/30 ‹ SV ‹ Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 15. 8. 98 II (Rättsakter vilkas publicering inte är obligatorisk) KOMMISSIONEN KOMMISSIONENS REKOMMENDATION av den 29 juli 1998 om ändring av rekommendation 98/195/EG om samtrafik på en avreglerad telekom- munikationsmarknad (Del 1 — Prissättning vid samtrafik) [delgivet med nr K(1998) 2234] (Text av betydelse för EES) (98/511/EG) EUROPEISKA GEMENSKAPERNAS KOMMISSION UTFÄRDAR DENNA REKOMMENDATION med beaktande av Fördraget om upprättandet av Europeiska gemenskapen, med beaktande av Europaparlamentets och rådets direktiv 97/33/EG av den 30 juni 1997 om samtrafik inom telekommunikation i syfte att säkerställa samhällsomfattande tjänster och samverkan genom tillämpning av principerna om tillhandahållande av öppna nät (1), särskilt artikel 7. 5 i detta, och av följande skäl: Punkt 9 i rekommendation 98/195/EG (2) anger att rekommendationen, särskilt de avgifter som beräknats med ”bästa kända metod” i punkt 4 och uppgifterna i bilaga II skall ses över och om nödvändigt uppdateras av kommissionen senast den 31 juli 1998. Denna rekommendation bör uppdateras för att ta hänsyn till de samtrafiksavgifter som beräknats med ”bästa kända metod” i punkt 4 i rekommendationen och kostnadsuppgifterna för medlems- staterna i bilaga II till rekommendationen. Samråd har skett med den rådgivande kommitté som inrättats genom artikel 9. 1 i rådets direktiv 90/387/EEG av den 28 juni 1990 om upprättandet av den inre marknaden för teletjänster genom att tillhandahålla öppna nät (3), ändrat genom Europaparlamentets och rådets direktiv 97/51/ EG (4). HÄRIGENOM REKOMMENDERAS FÖLJANDE. Rekommendation 98/195/EG ändras på följande sätt: Artikel 1 (1) EGT L 199, 26. 7. 1997, s. 32. (2) EGT L 73, 12. 3. 1998, s. 42. (3) EGT L 192, 24. 7. 1990, s. 1. (4) EGT L 295, 29. 10. 1997, s. 23. 15. 8. 98 ‹ SV ‹ Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning L 228/31 1) Följande punkt 4a skall införas: ”4a På grundval av de uppgifter som lämnas i bilaga II är följande avgifter, beräknade enligt ”bästa kända metod”, de rekommenderade högsta samtrafiksavgifterna från och med den 1 januari 1999: Samtrafiksavgifter beräknade enligt ”bästa kända metod” Samtrafiksavgift enligt ”bästa kända metod” för framkoppling av samtal på LOKAL nivå (det vill säga genom en lokal station eller så nära en lokal station som möjligt) mellan 0,5 och 1,0 ecu/100 per minut (vid högtrafik) Samtrafiksavgift enligt ”bästa kända metod” för samtrafik genom ENKEL TRANSIT- TRAFIK (storstadsnivå) mellan 0,8 och 1,6 ecu/100 per minut (vid högtrafik) Samtrafiksavgift enligt ”bästa kända metod” för samtrafik genom DUBBEL TRANSIT- TRAFIK (nationell nivå – mer än 200 km) mellan 1,5 och 2,3 ecu/100 per minut (vid högtrafik)” 2) I punkt 9 skall datumet den 31 juli 1998 ersättas med datumet den 31 juli 1999. 3) Figur 1a nedan skall läggas till i del 1 i bilaga II: Samtrafiksavgifter för framkoppling av samtal (maj 1998) ”Figur 1a (1) De senaste taxorna föreslagna av operatören men ännu ej godkända av den nationella tillsynsmyndigheten. ” L 228/32 ‹ SV ‹ Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 15. 8. 98 4) Tabellen i bilagan skall läggas till i del 3 i bilaga II. Denna rekommendation riktar sig till medlemsstaterna. Artikel 2 Utfärdad i Bryssel den 29 juli 1998. På kommissionens vägnar Martin BANGEMANN Ledamot av kommissionen 15. 8. 98 ‹ SV ‹ Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning L 228/33 BILAGA ”Tabell 1a Detaljerade kostnadsuppgifter för medlemsstaterna (maj 1998) Samtrafiksavgifter per minut baserade på ett treminuterssamtal Grundläggande utgångsvärden i ecu-cent (dvs. ecu/100) Exklusive moms Medlemsstat Lokal nivå Storstads- nivå Nationell nivå (4) Växelkurs gentemot ecu (maj 1998) Österrike 1,80 (1) 1,80 2,37 13,9 Belgien 1,11 2,10 2,94 41 Danmark 0,98 1,82 2,22 7,50 Finland 1,42–1,58 (1) 1,42–1,58 (2) 2,81–3,91 (2) 6,01 Frankrike 0,70 1,71 2,52 6,63 Tyskland (5) 0,99 1,69–2,14 2,58 1,98 Grekland (*) 1,81 (1) 1,81 2,59 351 Samtrafiksavgifter i lokala valutor, datum priserna gäller för, annan tilläggsinformation Priser fr. o. m. 1. 1. 1998 (ATS): — lokal nivå = saknas — regional nivå = 0,25 per min. — nationell nivå = 0,33 per min. Priser fr. o. m 1. 1. 1998 (BEF): — lokal nivå = 0,14 per samtal + 0,41 per min. — regional nivå = 0,27 per samtal + 0,77 per min. — nationell nivå = 0,38 per samtal + 1,08 per min. Priser fr. o. m. september 1997 (DKK/100): — lokal station = 4 per samtal + 6 per min. — enkel transitstation = 8 per samtal + 11 per min. — dubbel transitstation = 8 per samtal + 14 per min. Priser gällande den 1. 9. 1998 (FIM/100): — lokal nivå = saknas — teledistrikt = 16,5 per samtal + 3 eller 4 per min. — nationell nivå = teledistrikt + 8,8 till 14 per min. Priser fr. o. m. 1. 1. 1998 (FF/100): — lokal station = 4,69 per min. — enkel transitstation = 11,40 per min. — dubbel transitstation (;200 km) = 16,77 per min. Priser fr. o. m. 1. 1. 1998 (DM/100): — City = 1,97 per min. — Regio50 = 3,36 per min. — Regio200 = 4,25 per min. — nationell nivå = 5,14 per min. för mobiltelefonoperatörer Föreslagna priser (GRD): — storstadsnivå = 1,7 per samtal + 5,8 per min. — nationell nivå = 2,4 per samtal + 8,3 per min. 1998 Italien (*) 1,51 (3) 2,47 1 958 Föreslagna priser fr. o. m. 1. 1. 1998 (Lire): — lokal nivå (fr. o. m. 1. 9. 1998) = 29,6 per min. — regional nivå = 48,4 per min. — nationell nivå = saknas L 228/34 ‹ SV ‹ Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 15. 8. 98 Samtrafiksavgifter per minut baserade på ett treminuterssamtal Grundläggande utgångsvärden i ecu-cent (dvs. ecu/100) Exklusive moms Medlemsstat Irland Lokal nivå 2,20 Storstads- nivå Nationell nivå (4) 4,15 5,18 0,79 Växelkurs gentemot ecu (maj 1998) Samtrafiksavgifter i lokala valutor, datum priserna gäller för, annan tilläggsinformation Luxemburg (*) 2,01 (1) 2,01 2,01 41 Nederländerna (6) 1,17 1,60 2,06 2,23 Portugal (*) (7) 1,20 2,37 18 203 Spanien 1,49 (1) 1,49 4,17 168 Sverige 1,14 1,77 2,41 8,45 Förenade kungariket 0,61 0,87 1,69 0,68 Priser för mobiltelefonoperatörer 1998 (IRLP/100): — lokal nivå = 1,74 per min. — enkel transitstation = 3,28 per min. — nationell nivå = 4,09 per min. Föreslagna priser fr. o. m. 1. 7. 1998 (LUF): — alla nivåer: 0,825 per min. Priser fastställda av OPTA (Fl/100): — lokal station = 1,5 per samtal + 2,1 per min. — storstadsnivå = 2,3 per samtal + 2,8 per min. — nationell nivå = 3 per samtal + 3,6 per min. Priser fr. o. m. 1997 för mobiltelefonoperatörer (PTE): — lokal nivå = 2,43 per min. — storstadsnivå = 4,86 per min. — nationell nivå = 36,4 per min. Priser fr. o. m. april 1997 (ESP): — lokal nivå = saknas — storstadsnivå = 2,5 per min. — nationell nivå = 7 per min. Priser fr. o. m. 1. 1. 1998 (SEK/100): — lokal station = 7 per samtal + 7,3 per min. — enkel transitstation = 7 per samtal + 12,6 per min. — dubbel transitstation = 7 per samtal + 18 per min. Priser fr. o. m. maj 1998 (GBP/100): — lokal station = 0,4117 per min. — enkel transitstation = 0,5928 per min. — dubbel transitstation (;200 km) = 1,1518 per min. Källa: Nationella tillsynsmyndigheter och kommissionen. Anmärkningar (1) I Spanien, Finland, Grekland, Österrike och Luxemburg täcker den lägsta samtrafiksavgiften samtrafik i nivå med lokal station eller transitstation. Den lo- kala taxan är därför densamma som taxan för enkel överföring/transit. (2) I Finland finns två priser vid enkel transit beroende på teledistriktets områdesnummer, och vid dubbel transit gäller ett prisintervall beroende på trafikens volym. (3) I Italien finns lokala taxor tillgängliga först från den 1 september 1998. (4) Taxan för ’dubbel överföring’ inbegriper en avståndskomponent för förbindelselänkar på över 200 km. (5) De fyra avgiftszonerna i Tyskland, som bygger på avstånd, motsvarar inte exakt de tre banden i tabellen som bygger på tekniska faktorer. (6) De samtrafiksavgifter som gäller för enkel och dubbel transit i Nederländerna har fastställts av den nationella tillsynsmyndigheten i samband med avgö- randet av en tvist. Eftersom domen har överklagats kan andra priser än dem som anges i tabellen förekomma för enkel och dubbel transit (den 1 mars var dessa 1,82 ecu-cent per minut vid enkel transit och 2,33 ecu-cent per minut vid dubbel transit). (7) De avgifter som anges för Portugal är de som tillämpas av Portugal Telecom för mobiltelefonoperatörer och de kan vara fastställda i förhållande till opera- törernas återförsäljningspriser. Den nationella tillsynsmyndigheten (ICP) håller på att undersöka situationen. (*) De senaste taxorna föreslagna av operatören men ännu ej godkända av den nationella tillsynsmyndigheten. ”


title: Verordening (EG) nr. 1672/98 van de Commissie van 29 juli 1998 tot vaststelling van de mate waarin gevolg kan worden gegeven aan de aanvragen om invoercertificaten voor de bepaalde producten in de sectoren slachtpluimvee en eieren, die in juli 1998 worden ingediend op grond van de regeling die is vastegesteld in de door de Gemeenschap gesloten overeenkomsten met de Republiek Polen, de Republiek Hongarije, de Tsjechische Republiek, Slowakije, Roelenië en Bulgarije

eurovoc_concepts:
Central and Eastern Europe
agreement (EU)
egg
import licence
poultrymeat

text: L 212/8 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen 30. 7. 98 VERORDENING (EG) Nr. 1672/98 VAN DE COMMISSIE van 29 juli 1998 tot vaststelling van de mate waarin gevolg kan worden gegeven aan de aanvragen om invoercertificaten voor bepaalde producten in de sectoren slachtpluimvee en eieren, die in juli 1998 worden ingediend op grond van de regeling die is vastge- steld in de door de Gemeenschap gesloten overeenkomsten met de Republiek Polen, de Republiek Hongar¶e, de Tsjechische Republiek, Slowak¶e, Roemeni(cid:137) en Bulgar¶e DE COMMISSIE VAN DE EUROPESE GEMEENSCHAPPEN, oog op een bill¶ke verdeling, met een vast percentage verminderd moeten worden, Gelet op het Verdrag tot oprichting van de Europese Gemeenschap, Gelet op Verordening (EG) nr. 1899/97 van de Commissie van 29 september 1997 houdende vaststelling van bepa- lingen voor de uitvoering, in de sectoren slachtpluimvee en eieren, van de regeling waarin is voorzien b¶ Verorde- ning (EG) nr. 3066/95 van de Raad, en houdende intrek- king van de Verordeningen (EEG) nr. 2699/93 en (EG) nr. 1559/94 (1), en met name op artikel 4, lid 5, Overwegende dat voor een aantal producten de in de invoercertificaten voor het derde kwartaal van 1998 aangevraagde hoeveelheden niet groter z¶n dan de beschikbare hoeveelheden en derhalve volledig ingewil- ligd kunnen worden, terw¶l voor een aantal andere producten de beschikbare hoeveelheden worden over- schreden, zodat de aangevraagde hoeveelheden, met het HEEFT DE VOLGENDE VERORDENING VASTGESTELD: Artikel 1 1. De op grond van Verordening (EG) nr. 1899/97 inge- diende aanvragen om invoercertificaten voor de periode van 1 juli tot en met 30 september 1998 worden ingewil- ligd voor het in b¶lage I aangegeven percentage. 2. In de eerste tien dagen van de periode van 1 oktober tot en met 31 december 1998 kunnen overeenkomstig Verordening (EG) nr. 1899/97 invoercertificaten worden aangevraagd tot de in b¶lage II aangegeven hoeveelheid. Artikel 2 Deze verordening treedt in werking op 30 juli 1998. Deze verordening is verbindend in al haar onderdelen en is rechtstreeks toepassel¶k in elke lidstaat. Gedaan te Brussel, 29 juli 1998. Voor de Commissie Franz FISCHLER Lid van de Commissie (1) PB L 267 van 30. 9. 1997, blz. 67. 30. 7. 98 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen L 212/9 B(cid:246)LAGE I Groep Percentage waarvoor de invoercertificaten worden ingewilligd voor de periode van 1 juli tot en met 30 september 1998 1 2 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 43 44 45 3,36 3,41 100,00 2,24 17,54 3,27 100,00 (cid:190) 100,00 (cid:190) 3,16 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 18,23 78,07 (cid:190) 100,00 (cid:190) 7,75 100,00 L 212/10 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen 30. 7. 98 B(cid:246)LAGE II (in ton) Groep Totale beschikbare hoeveelheid voor de periode van 1 oktober tot en met 31 december 1998 1 2 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 43 44 45 3 823,75 373,75 10 326,50 2 415,00 603,75 1 380,00 942,90 287,50 1 119,50 2 012,50 1 408,75 805,00 862,50 172,50 342,13 1 345,50 1 256,38 115,00 3 047,50 172,50 1 265,00 241,50 1 035,00 402,50 287,50 1 437,50 115,00 575,00 143,75 143,75 920,00 293,25 575,00 316,25 881,50


title: Kommissionens förordning (EG) nr 1683/98 av den 29 juli 1998 om försäljning av nötkött som innehas av vissa interventionsorgan till i förväg fastställda priser

eurovoc_concepts:
beef
intervention agency
intervention price
sale

text: 30. 7. 98 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning L 212/41 KOMMISSIONENS F(cid:153)RORDNING (EG) nr 1683/98 av den 29 juli 1998 om f(cid:148)rs(cid:132)ljning av n(cid:148)tk(cid:148)tt som innehas av vissa interventionsorgan till i f(cid:148)rv(cid:132)g fastst(cid:132)llda priser EUROPEISKA GEMENSKAPERNAS KOMMISSION HAR ANTAGIT DENNA F(cid:153)RORDNING med beaktande av F(cid:148)rdraget om uppr(cid:132)ttandet av Euro- peiska gemenskapen, med beaktande av r(cid:134)dets f(cid:148)rordning (EEG) nr 805/68 av den 27 juni 1968 om den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden f(cid:148)r n(cid:148)tk(cid:148)tt (1), senast (cid:132)ndrad genom f(cid:148)rord- ning (EG) nr 2634/97 (2), s(cid:132)rskilt artikel 7. 3 i denna, och av f(cid:148)ljande sk(cid:132)l: Till(cid:132)mpningen av interventions(cid:134)tg(cid:132)rder f(cid:148)r n(cid:148)tk(cid:148)tt har medf(cid:148)rt att det finns stora lager i flera medlemsstater. F(cid:148)r att undvika alltf(cid:148)r l(cid:134)ng lagring b(cid:148)r en del av dessa lager s(cid:132)ljas. Med vissa s(cid:132)rskilda undantag, vilka (cid:132)r n(cid:148)dv(cid:132)ndiga, b(cid:148)r s(cid:134)dan f(cid:148)rs(cid:132)ljning ske enligt reglerna i kommissionens f(cid:148)rordning (EEG) nr 2173/79 (3), senast (cid:132)ndrad genom f(cid:148)rordning (EG) nr 2417/95 (4), s(cid:132)rskilt avdelningarna I och II i denna. F(cid:148)r att s(cid:132)kerst(cid:132)lla ekonomisk f(cid:148)rvaltning av lagren, b(cid:148)r interventionsorganen f(cid:148)rst s(cid:132)lja det k(cid:148)tt som h(cid:134)llits l(cid:132)ngst i lager. Det (cid:132)r l(cid:132)mpligt att medge undantag fr(cid:134)n best(cid:132)mmelserna i artikel 2. 2 i f(cid:148)rordning (EEG) nr 2173/79 med tanke p(cid:134) de administrativa sv(cid:134)righeter som till(cid:132)mpningen av denna punkt v(cid:134)llar i de ber(cid:148)rda medlemsstaterna. De (cid:134)tg(cid:132)rder som f(cid:148)reskrivs i denna f(cid:148)rordning (cid:132)r f(cid:148)renliga med yttrandet fr(cid:134)n F(cid:148)rvaltningskommitt(cid:130)n f(cid:148)r n(cid:148)tk(cid:148)tt. H(cid:142)RIGENOM F(cid:153)RESKRIVS F(cid:153)LJANDE. Artikel 1 1. F(cid:148)rs(cid:132)ljning skall ske av produkter som omfattas av intervention enligt artikel 6 i f(cid:148)rordning (EEG) nr 805/68, och som utg(cid:148)r (cid:190) cirka 200 ton bakkvartsparter med ben som innehas av det belgiska interventionsorganet, (cid:190) cirka 200 ton bakkvartsparter med ben som innehas av det danska interventionsorganet, (cid:190) cirka 200 ton bakkvartsparter med ben som innehas av det tyska interventionsorganet, (cid:190) cirka 200 ton bakkvartsparter med ben som innehas av det spanska interventionsorganet, (1) EGT L 148, 28. 6. 1968, s. 24. (2) EGT L 356, 31. 12. 1997, s. 13. (3) EGT L 251, 5. 10. 1979, s. 12. (4) EGT L 248, 14. 10. 1995, s. 39. (cid:190) cirka 200 ton bakkvartsparter med ben som innehas av det franska interventionsorganet, (cid:190) cirka 400 ton bakkvartsparter med ben som innehas av det italienska interventionsorganet, (cid:190) cirka 200 ton bakkvartsparter med ben som innehas av det irl(cid:132)ndska interventionsorganet, (cid:190) cirka 200 ton bakkvartsparter med ben som innehas av det nederl(cid:132)ndska interventionsorganet, (cid:190) cirka 200 ton bakkvartsparter med ben som innehas av det (cid:148)sterrikiska interventionsorganet, (cid:190) cirka 400 ton n(cid:148)tk(cid:148)tt utan ben som innehas av det franska interventionsorganet, (cid:190) cirka 2 100 ton n(cid:148)tk(cid:148)tt utan ben som innehas av det irl(cid:132)ndska interventionsorganet, (cid:190) cirka 2 100 ton n(cid:148)tk(cid:148)tt utan ben som innehas av interventionsorganet i F(cid:148)renade kungariket. (cid:190) cirka 1 ton n(cid:148)tk(cid:148)tt utan ben som innehas av det danska interventionsorganet. N(cid:132)rmare upplysningar om kvantiteter och deras f(cid:148)rs(cid:132)lj- ningspriser ges i bilaga I. 2. Om inte annat s(cid:132)gs i best(cid:132)mmelserna i denna f(cid:148)rord- ning skall de produkter som avses i punkt 1 s(cid:132)ljas i enlighet med best(cid:132)mmelserna i kommissionens f(cid:148)rord- ning (EEG) nr 2173/79, s(cid:132)rskilt avdelningarna I och III i denna. Artikel 2 1. Upplysningar om kvantiteter och om var produk- terna h(cid:134)lls i lager kan inh(cid:132)mtas p(cid:134) de adresser som anges i bilaga II till den h(cid:132)r f(cid:148)rordningen. F(cid:148)r varje produkt i bilaga I skall interventionsor- 2. ganen f(cid:148)rst s(cid:132)lja det k(cid:148)tt som h(cid:134)llits l(cid:132)ngst i lager. 3. Trots artikel 2. 2 i f(cid:148)rordning (EEG) nr 2173/79 skall det i ans(cid:148)kan om k(cid:148)p inte anges i vilket eller vilka kyl- eller fryshus som produkterna f(cid:148)rvaras. Artikel 3 Den s(cid:132)kerhet som f(cid:148)reskrivs i artikel 15. 1 i f(cid:148)rordning (EEG) nr 2173/79 skall vara 120 ecu per ton. Artikel 4 Denna f(cid:148)rordning tr(cid:132)der i kraft den sjunde dagen efter det att den har offentliggjorts i Europeiska gemenska- pernas officiella tidning. L 212/42 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 30. 7. 98 Denna f(cid:148)rordning (cid:132)r till alla delar bindande och direkt till(cid:132)mplig i alla medlemsstater. Utf(cid:132)rdad i Bryssel den 29 juli 1998. P(cid:134) kommissionens v(cid:132)gnar Franz FISCHLER Ledamot av kommissionen 30. 7. 98 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning L 212/43 ANEXO I (cid:190) BILAG I (cid:190) ANHANG I (cid:190) PAQAQTGLA I (cid:190) ANNEX I (cid:190) ANNEXE I (cid:190) ALLEGATO I (cid:190) B(cid:246)LAGE I (cid:190) ANEXO I (cid:190) LIITE I (cid:190) BILAGA I Estado miembro Medlemsstat Mitgliedstaat Jq(cid:145)tor l(cid:146)kor Member State (cid:144)tat membre Stato membro Lidstaat Estado-membro J(cid:132)senvaltio Medlemsstat Productos (1) Produkter (1) Erzeugnisse (1) Pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mta (1) Products (1) Produits (1) Prodotti (1) Producten (1) Produtos (1) Tuotteet (1) Produkter (1) Cantidad aproximada (toneladas) Tilnærmet mængde (tons) Ungef(cid:132)hre Mengen (Tonnen) Jat(cid:145) pqos(cid:146)ccisg pos(cid:149)tgta (t(cid:149)moi) Approximate quantity (tonnes) Quantit(cid:130) approximative (tonnes) Quantit(cid:133) approssimativa (tonnellate) Hoeveelheid bij benadering (ton) Quantidade aproximada (toneladas) Arvioitu m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132) (tonneina) Ungef(cid:132)rlig kvantitet (ton) Precio de venta expresado en ecus por tonelada Salgspriser i ECU/ton Verkaufspreise, ausgedr(cid:129)ckt in ECU/Tonne Til(cid:146)r p(cid:150)kgsgr ejvqaf(cid:149)lemer se Ecu am(cid:145) t(cid:149)mo Selling prices expressed in ecus per tonne Prix de vente exprim(cid:130)s en (cid:130)cus par tonne Prezzi di vendita espressi in ecu per tonnellata Verkooppr¶zen uitgedrukt in ECU per ton Pre(cid:135)o de venda expresso em ecus por tonelada Myyntihinta ecuina tonnilta F(cid:148)rs(cid:132)ljningspris i ecu per ton a) Carne con hueso (cid:190) Kød, ikke udbenet (cid:190) Fleisch mit Knochen (cid:190) Jq(cid:146)ata le j(cid:149)jaka (cid:190) Bone-in beef (cid:190) Viande avec os (cid:190) Carni non disossate (cid:190) Vlees met been (cid:190) Carne com osso (cid:190) Luullinen naudanliha (cid:190) K(cid:148)tt med ben BELGIQUE/BELGI(cid:220) (cid:190) Quartiers arri(cid:138)re/Achtervoeten DANMARK (cid:190) Bagfjerdinger DEUTSCHLAND (cid:190) Hinterviertel ESPA(cid:158)A FRANCE IRELAND ITALIA NEDERLAND (cid:153)STERREICH (cid:190) Cuartos traseros (cid:190) Quartiers arri(cid:138)re (cid:190) Hindquarters (cid:190) Quarti posteriori (cid:190) Achtervoeten (cid:190) Hinterviertel 200 200 200 200 200 200 400 200 200 1 800 1 850 2 000 2 000 1 850 1 800 1 900 1 800 1 900 b) Carne deshuesada (cid:190) Udbenet kød (cid:190) Fleisch ohne Knochen (cid:190) Jq(cid:146)ata wyq(cid:148)r j(cid:149)jaka (cid:190) Boneless beef (cid:190) Viande d(cid:130)soss(cid:130)e (cid:190) Carni senza osso (cid:190) Vlees zonder been (cid:190) Carne desossada (cid:190) Luuton naudanliha (cid:190) Benfritt k(cid:148)tt DANMARK (cid:190) Tyksteg (INT 16) FRANCE IRELAND (cid:190) Semelle (INT 14) (cid:190) Rumsteak (INT 16) (cid:190) Intervention thick flank (INT 12) (cid:190) Intervention topside (INT 13) (cid:190) Intervention silverside (INT 14) (cid:190) Intervention fillet (INT 15) (cid:190) Intervention rump (INT 16) (cid:190) Intervention striploin (INT 17) (cid:190) Intervention forerib (INT 19) UNITED KINGDOM (cid:190) Intervention thick flank (INT 12) (cid:190) Intervention topside (INT 13) (cid:190) Intervention silverside (INT 14) (cid:190) Intervention fillet (INT 15) (cid:190) Intervention rump (INT 16) (cid:190) Intervention striploin (INT 17) (cid:190) Intervention forerib (INT 19) 1 200 200 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 2 400 2 400 2 600 2 750 3 150 2 500 9 100 3 200 5 300 3 000 2 750 3 350 2 650 7 400 4 100 5 000 3 000 L 212/44 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 30. 7. 98 (1) V(cid:130)anse los anexos V y VII del Reglamento (CEE) no 2456/93 de la Comisi(cid:155)n (DO L 225 de 4. 9. 1993, p. 4), cuya (cid:156)ltima modificaci(cid:155)n la constituye el Reglamento (CE) no 2602/97 (DO L 351 de 23. 12. 1997, p. 20). (1) Se bilag V og VII til Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 2456/93 (EFT L 225 af 4. 9. 1993, s. 4), senest ændret ved forordning (EF) nr. 2602/97 (EFT L 351 af 23. 12. 1997, s. 20). (1) Vgl. Anh(cid:132)nge V und VII der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2456/93 der Kommission (ABl. L 225 vom 4. 9. 1993, S. 4), zuletzt ge(cid:132)ndert durch die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2602/97 (ABl. L 351 vom 23. 12. 1997, S. 20). (1) Bk(cid:146)pe paqaqt(cid:147)lata V jai VII tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EOJ) aqih. 2456/93 tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r (EE L 225 tgr 4. 9. 1993, s. 4), (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi(cid:147)hgje tekeuta(cid:148)a ap(cid:149) tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 2602/97 (EE L 351 tgr 23. 12. 1997, s. 20). (1) See Annexes V and VII to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2456/93 (OJ L 225, 4. 9. 1993, p. 4), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2602/97 (OJ L 351, 23. 12. 1997, p. 20). (1) Voir annexes V et VII du r(cid:138)glement (CEE) no 2456/93 de la Commission (JO L 225 du 4. 9. 1993, p. 4). R(cid:138)glement modifi(cid:130) en dernier lieu par le r(cid:138)glement (CE) no 2602/97 (JO L 351 du 23. 12. 1997, p. 20). (1) Cfr. allegati V e VII del regolamento (CEE) n. 2456/93 della Commissione (GU L 225 del 4. 9. 1993, pag. 4), modificato da ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 2602/97 (GU L 351 del 23. 12. 1997, pag. 20). (1) Zie de b¶lagen V en VII bij Verordening (EEG) nr. 2456/93 van de Commissie (PB L 225 van 4. 9. 1993, blz. 4), laatstelijk gewijzigd bij Verordening (EG) nr. 2602/97 (PB L 351 van 23. 12. 1997, blz. 20). (1) Ver anexos V e VII do Regulamento (CEE) nº 2456/93 da Comiss(cid:209)o (JO L 225 de 4. 9. 1993, p. 4). Regulamento com a (cid:156)ltima redac(cid:135)(cid:209)o que lhe foi dada pelo Regulamento (CE) nº 2602/97 (JO L 351 de 23. 12. 1997, p. 20). (1) Katso komission asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2456/93 (EYVL L 225, 4. 9. 1993, s. 4), sellaisena kuin se on viimeksi muutettuna asetuksella (EY) N:o 2602/97 (EYVL L 351, 23. 12. 1997, s. 20), liitteet V ja VII. (1) Se bilaga V och VII i f(cid:148)rordning (EEG) nr 2456/93 (EGT L 225, 4. 9. 1993, s. 4), senast (cid:132)ndrad genom f(cid:148)rordning (EG) nr 2602/97 (EGT L 351, 23. 12. 1997, s. 20). 30. 7. 98 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning L 212/45 ANEXO II (cid:190) BILAG II (cid:190) ANHANG II (cid:190) PAQAQTGLA II (cid:190) ANNEX II (cid:190) ANNEXE II (cid:190) ALLEGATO II (cid:190) BIJLAGE II (cid:190) ANEXO II (cid:190) LIITE II (cid:190) BILAGA II Direcciones de los organismos de intervenci(cid:155)n (cid:190) Interventionsorganernes adresser (cid:190) Anschriften der Interventionsstellen (cid:190) Dieuh(cid:151)mseir tym oqcamisl(cid:150)m paqelb(cid:145)seyr (cid:190) Addresses of the intervention agencies (cid:190) Adresses des organismes d’intervention (cid:190) Indirizzi degli organismi d’intervento (cid:190) Adressen van de interventiebureaus (cid:190) Endere(cid:135)os dos organismos de interven(cid:135)(cid:209)o (cid:190) Interventioelinten osoitteet (cid:190) Interventionsorganens adresser BELGIQUE/BELGI(cid:220) Bureau d’intervention et de restitution belge Rue de Tr(cid:138)ves 82 B-1040 Bruxelles Belgisch Interventie- en Restitutiebureau Trierstraat 82 B-1040 Brussel T(cid:130)l(cid:130)phone/Tel. : 230 25 33/280 03 07 (32-2) 287 24 11; t(cid:130)lex/telex: BIRB. BRUB/24076-65567; t(cid:130)l(cid:130)copieur/telefax: (32-2) BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND Bundesanstalt f(cid:129)r Landwirtschaft und Ern(cid:132)hrung (BLE) Postfach 180203, D-60083 Frankfurt am Main Adickesallee 40 D-60322 Frankfurt am Main Tel. : (49) 69 1564-704/772; Telex: 411727; Telefax: (49) 69 15 64-790/791 DANMARK Ministeriet for Fødevarer, Landbrug og Fiskeri EU-direktoratet Kampmannsgade 3 DK-1780 København V Tlf. (45) 33 92 70 00; telex 151317 DK; fax (45) 33 92 69 48, (45) 33 92 69 23 ESPA(cid:158)A FEGA (Fondo Espa(cid:157)ol de Garant(cid:146)a Agraria) Beneficencia, 8 E-28005 Madrid Tel(cid:130)fono: 915 22 43 87 (34) 913 47 65 00, 913 47 63 10; t(cid:130)lex: FEGA 23427 E, FEGA 41818 E; fax: (34) 915 21 98 32, FRANCE OFIVAL 80, avenue des Terroirs-de-France F-75607 Paris Cedex 12 T(cid:130)l(cid:130)phone: (33 1) 44 68 50 00; t(cid:130)lex: 215330; t(cid:130)l(cid:130)copieur: (33 1) 44 68 52 33 ITALIA AIMA (Azienda di Stato per gli interventi nel mercato agricolo) Via Palestro 81 I-00185 Roma Tel. 49 49 91; telex 61 30 03; telefax: 445 39 40/445 19 58 IRELAND Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry Agriculture House Kildare Street Dublin 2 Ireland Tel. (01) 678 90 11, ext. 2278 and 3806; telex 93292 and 93607, telefax (01) 661 62 63, (01) 678 52 14 and (01) 662 01 98 L 212/46 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 30. 7. 98 NEDERLAND Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij, Voedselvoorzieningsin- en verkoopbureau p/a LASER, Zuidoost Slachthuisstraat 71 Postbus 965 6040 AZ Roermond Tel. : (31-475) 35 54 44; telex: 56396 VIBNL; telefax: (31-475) 31 89 39. (cid:153)STERREICH AMA-Agrarmarkt Austria Dresdner Straße 70 A-1201 Wien Tel. : (431) 33 15 12 20; Telefax: (431) 33 15 1297 UNITED KINGDOM Intervention Board Executive Agency Kings House 33 Kings Road Reading RG1 3BU Berkshire United Kingdom Tel. (01-189) 58 36 26 Fax (01-189) 56 67 50


title: 1998 m. liepos 29 d. Komisijos reglamentas (EB) Nr. 1677/98 iš dalies keičiantis Reglamentą (EEB) Nr. 2454/93, išdėstantį Tarybos reglamento (EEB) Nr. 2913/92, nustatančio Bendrijos muitinės kodeksą, įgyvendinimo nuostatasTekstas svarbus EEE.

eurovoc_concepts:
EU law
customs territory (EU)
customs union
legal code
simplification of formalities

text: 30 LT Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys 02/9 t. 31998R1677 1998 7 30 EUROPOS BENDRIJŲ OFICIALUSIS LEIDINYS L 212/18 KOMISIJOS REGLAMENTAS (EB) Nr. 1677/98 1998 m. liepos 29 d. iš dalies keičiantis Reglamentą (EEB) Nr. 2454/93, išdėstantį Tarybos reglamento (EEB) Nr. 2913/92, nustatančio Bendrijos muitinės kodeksą, įgyvendinimo nuostatas (tekstas svarbus EEE) EUROPOS BENDRIJŲ KOMISIJA, atsižvelgdama į Europos bendrijos steigimo sutartį, kai tik prekės atvežamos į paskirties vietą; kadangi tais atvejais, kai prekių kontrolė atliekama tik po muitinės įforminimo, jos gali būti laikomos neatleistomis nuo muitinės priežiūros, jeigu tik klaida ištaisoma nepakenkiant finansiniams interesams; kadangi tokia galimybe neturėtų būti piktnaudžiaujama; atsižvelgdama į 1992 m. spalio 12 d. Tarybos reglamentą (EEB) Nr. 2913/92, nustatantį Bendrijos muitinės kodeksą (1), su pasku- tiniais pakeitimais, padarytais Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos reglamentu (EB) Nr. 82/97 (2), ypač į jo 249 straipsnį, kadangi Komisijos reglamento (EEB) Nr. 2454/93 (3) su paskuti- niais pakeitimais, padarytais Reglamentu (EB) Nr. 75/98 (4), nuo- statos dėl muitinės vertės deklaranto, turėtų būti suderintos su nuostatomis, taikomomis muitinės deklarantui, kad ir vienos, ir kitos nuostatos būtų nuosekliau taikomos; kadangi Bendrijos teisės aktai dėl laikino išvežimo perdirbti numato atvejus, kai leidimai suteikiami Komisijos sprendimu; kadangi tvarkos taikymas turėtų būti supaprastintas iš dalies kei- čiant tvarką, pagal kurią leidimai suteikiami visiems asmenims, išskyrus tuos, kurie rengiasi laikino išvežimo perdirbti įforminimo operacijoms, atliekamoms pagal Komiteto nustatytą tvarką; kadangi tikslinga racionalizuoti procedūras, kurios turi būti įgy- vendintos Bendrijos lygiu ir yra susijusios, viena vertus, su aplinkybėmis, kurios nereikalauja atitinkamo įrašo importo ar eksporto muitų apskaitoje ir, kita vertus, prašymų dėl importo ar eksporto muitų grąžinimo ar neišmokėjimo; kadangi patartina padidinti egzistuojančią ribą, žemiau kurios valstybės narės pačios gali nutarti, jei neiškyla abejonių, nedaryti įrašo neapmokestinto muito apskaitoje, jei jos mano, kad visos sąlygos, minėtos Reglamento (EEB) Nr. 2913/92 (toliau – kodek- sas) 220 straipsnio 2 dalies b punkte, tenkinamos; kadangi, be viso to, patartina nustatyti ribą ekiu, žemiau kurios valstybės narės gali pačios nustatyti, jei neiškyla abejonių, skirti grąžinimą ar neišmokėjimą, jei jos mano, kad tenkinamos kodekso 239 straips- nio 1 dalyje nurodytos sąlygos; kadangi norint gauti naudos iš grąžintų prekių apdorojimo, žemės ūkio produktai turi būti reimportuoti per 12 mėnesių nuo eks- porto deklaracijos priėmimo, ir šis laikotarpis jokiu būdu negali būti pratęstas; kadangi, remiantis įgyta patirtimi, muitinei turėtų būti leidžiama šį laikotarpį pratęsti, esant tinkamai pagrįstoms, išskirtinėms aplinkybėms; kadangi bylų duomenys turėtų būti perduoti Komisijai, kad būtų užtikrintas vienodas grąžinamųjų išmokų pagal bendrąją žemės ūkio politiką sureguliavimas; kadangi reikėtų apsaugoti asmenų, kuriems turi įtakos sprendimai dėl į importo ar eksporto muitų įrašymo į apskaitą po muitinio įforminimo, ir pareiškėjų, kuriems turi būti grąžinti importo ar eksporto muitai ar kuriuos turi būti atsisakyta iš jų išieškoti, teisę būti išklausytiems; kadangi todėl šioms suinteresuotoms šalims turėtų būti suteikta galimybė raštu išdėstyti savo pastabas dėl visų prieštaravimų, kuriuos Komisija numato padaryti savo sprendi- mais; kadangi ši aplinkybė reikalauja pakoreguoti laikotarpį, per kurį šie Komisijos sprendimai turi būti priimti; kadangi pasitaiko atvejų, ypač oro transportu pervežamų krovi- nių sektoriuje, kai dideli prekių kiekiai turi būti skubiai vežami; kadangi dėl to žymint prekių statusą gali atsirasti klaidų, kurios turi būti ištaisytos suinteresuoto asmens iniciatyva arba jo vardu, (1) OL L 302, 1992 10 19, p. 1. (2) OL L 17, 1997 1 21, p. 1. (3) OL L 253, 1993 10 11, p. 1. (4) OL L 7, 1998 1 13, p. 3. kadangi 1998 m. gegužės 3 d. Tarybos reglamentas (EB) Nr. 974/98 dėl euro įvedimo (5) numato, kad nuo 1999 m. sau- sio 1 d. euras taps dalyvaujančių valstybių narių valiuta; kadangi iki 2001 m. gruodžio 31 d. euras yra išreiškiamas nacionalinėmis valiutomis pagal perskaičiavimo kursus; kadangi todėl euras ir (5) OL L 139, 1998 5 11, p. 1. 02/9 t. LT Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys 31 nacionaliniai piniginiai vienetai teisiniu požiūriu yra lygiaverčiai; kadangi pereinamuoju laikotarpiu sutartys, nacionaliniai įstatymai ir kiti teisiniai dokumentai gali būti teisėtai priimami tiek nuro- dant eurą, tiek nacionalinį piniginį vienetą; kadangi paaiškėjo, kad dėl to būtina priimti priemones, kad būtų pakoreguotos taisyklės dėl bendrojo administracinio dokumento, siekiant, kad būtų galima naudoti eurą; kadangi todėl būtina iš dalies pakeisti 37 priedą; 2. 759 straipsnio 3 dalis pakeičiama taip: „3. Jei eksporto operacijas vykdo daugiau nei viena valstybė narė ir pateikiama paraiška suteikti vieną leidimą, taikoma 751 straipsnio 2 dalyje nustatyta tvarka. Jei yra prieštaravimų dėl leidimo projekto, Komisija pagal Komiteto nustatytą tvarką gali nuspręsti, ar galima išduoti lei- dimą ir kokiomis sąlygomis tai gali būti padaryta. “ kadangi 1998 m. vasario 12 d. Tarybos reglamentas (EB) Nr. 374/98, iš dalies pakeičiantis Reglamento (EB) Nr. 1172/95 dėl statistinių duomenų apie Bendrijos ir jos valstybių narių pre- kybą su šalimis, kurios nėra narės (1), 6 ir 9 straipsnius, numato nuo 1999 m. sausio 1 d. pakeisti šiuo metu statistikai naudojamą šalies nomenklatūrą, susijusią su prekyba, abėcėline nomenkla- tūra, pagrįsta ISO alpha-2 kodu; 3. 844 straipsnio 4 dalis papildoma šia pastraipa: „Tačiau kai prekės deklaruojamos išleidimui į laisvą apyvartą, pasibaigus pirmojoje pastraipoje nurodytam laikotarpiui, reimporto valstybės narės muitinė gali leisti jį pratęsti, jei tai pateisinama išskirtinėmis aplinkybėmis. Jei muitinės leidžia šį laikotarpį pratęsti, jos turi apie tai informuoti Komisiją“. kadangi todėl būtina pakoreguoti bendrojo administracinio doku- mento naudojimo taisykles, kad būtų atsižvelgta į šį pakeitimą; kadangi 38 priedą taip pat reikėtų atitinkamai pakoreguoti; kadangi vis dėlto pageidautina, kad valstybėms narėms būtų leista toliau naudoti esamus kodus, kol 37 ir 38 priedai nebus pakeisti; kadangi po to, kai bus priimtas Susitarimas dėl informacijos tech- nologijų, dėl ekonominių priežasčių pageidautina, kad būtų papil- dytas 87 priedo tam tikrų elektroninių komponentų ir panašių prekių sąrašas; kadangi šiame reglamente numatytos priemonės atitinka Muitinės kodekso komiteto nuomonę, 4. 865 straipsnis papildomas šia dalimi: „Tačiau jei oro transporto įmonės, turinčios leidimą taikyti supaprastiną tranzito procedūrą, naudoja elektroninę dekla- raciją, nelaikoma, kad prekės yra nebeprižiūrimos muitinės, jei suinteresuotojo asmens iniciatyva arba jo vardu jos yra vertinamos kaip ne Bendrijos prekės tol, kol muitinė nustato esant nenormalią padėtį, ir jeigu suinteresuoto asmens veikla neturi nesąžiningų sandorių požymių“. 5. 869 straipsnio b punkte terminas „2 000 ECU“ keičiamas ter- minu „50 000 ECU“. 6. Įterpiamas 872a straipsnis: „872a straipsnis PRIĖMĖ ŠĮ REGLAMENTĄ: 1 straipsnis Reglamentas (EEB) Nr. 2454/93 iš dalies keičiamas taip: 1. 178 straipsnio 2 dalis pakeičiama taip: „2. 1 dalyje nurodytą vertės deklaraciją pateikia tik Bendri- joje įsisteigęs asmuo, kuris disponuoja esminiais faktais. Kodekso 64 straipsnio 2 dalies b punkto antroji įtrauka ir kodekso 64 straipsnio 3 dalis taikomos mutatis mutandis“. (1) OL L 48, 1998 2 19, p. 6. 872 procedūrą, vykdydama suinteresuotam pateikta byla, ir Jeigu numatytą sprendimą, 873 straipsniuose, Komisija ketina priimti nepalankų asmeniui, ji perduoda savo prieštaravimus jam (jai) raštu kartu su visais juos grindžiančiais dokumentais. Komisijai pateikta byla suinteresuotas asmuo raštu pateikia savo požiūrį per mėnesį nuo tokių prieštaravimų išsiuntimo dienos. To nepadarius, laikoma, kad jis atsisakė teisės pareikšti savo požiūrį. “ 7. 873 straipsnis iš dalies keičiamas taip: a) pirmajame ir antrajame antrosios dalies sakiniuose „šeši mėnesiai“ pakeičiami žodžiais „devyni žodžiai mėnesiai“; 32 LT Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys 02/9 t. b) pridedama ši pastraipa: „Komisijai perdavus savo prieštaravimus pateikta byla suinteresuotam asmeniui, pagal 872a straipsnį devynių mėnesių terminas pratęsiamas tiek, kiek laiko praėjo nuo Komisijos prieštaravimų išsiuntimo iki dienos, kai ji gavo suinteresuoto asmens atsakymą arba, jei jo nėra, iki die- nos, kai baigėsi terminas, jam nustatytas savo požiūriui pateikti“. dokumentais. Prašymą grąžinti muitus arba atsisakyti juos išieškoti pateikęs pareiškėjas raštu pateikia savo požiūrį per mėnesį nuo minėtų prieštaravimų išsiuntimo dienos. To nepadarius per minėtą laikotarpį, laikoma, kad jis atsisakė teisės pareikšti savo požiūrį. “ 10. 907 straipsnis iš dalies keičiamas taip: a) Antrosios pastraipos pirmajame ir antrajame sakiniuose „šeši mėnesiai“ pakeičiami žodžiais „devyni žodžiai mėnesiai“; 8. 905 straipsnio 1 dalyje įterpiama antroji pastraipa: b) pridedama ši pastraipa: tuomet, kai juos išieškoti „Tačiau, išskyrus tuos atvejus, kai sprendimą priimanti mui- tinė abejoja, ji pati gali nuspręsti grąžinti muitus arba atsisa- kyti ji mano, kad Kodekso 239 straipsnio 1 dalyje nustatytos sąlygos yra vykdomos, jeigu tik atitinkama suma, tenkanti vienam ūkio subjektui vienos ar daugiau importo arba eksporto operacijų atžvilgiu, bet susidaranti esant vienoms ir toms pačioms ypatingoms aplinkybėms, yra mažesnė nei 50 000 ECU“. 9. Įterpiamas 906a straipsnis: „906a straipsnis Kai bet kuriuo metu, vykstant 906 ir 907 straipsniuose numatytai procedūrai, Komisija ketina priimti nepalankų sprendimą pareiškėjui, pateikusiam prašymą grąžinti muitus arba jam savo prieštaravimus raštu kartu su visais juos grindžiančiais juo išieškoti, ji pateikia atsisakyti „Komisijai perdavus savo prieštaravimus pareiškėjui, pateikusiam prašymą grąžinti muitus arba atsisakyti juos išieškoti, pagal 906a straipsnį devynių mėnesių terminas pratęsiamas tiek, kiek laiko praėjo nuo Komisijos priešta- ravimų išsiuntimo iki dienos, kai ji gavo suinteresuotos šalies atsakymą arba, jei jo nėra, iki dienos, kai baigėsi ter- minas, duotas jo/jos požiūriui pateikti“. 11. 37 priedas iš dalies keičiamas pagal šio reglamento I priedą. 12. 38 priedas iš dalies keičiamas pagal šio reglamento II priedą. 13. 87 priedas iš dalies keičiamas pagal šio reglamento III priedą. 2 straipsnis Šis reglamentas įsigalioja septintą dieną po jo paskelbimo Europos Bendrijų oficialiajame leidinyje. 1 straipsnio 11 ir 12 punktai taikomi nuo 1999 m. sausio 1 d. Šis reglamentas yra privalomas visas ir tiesiogiai taikomas visose valstybėse narėse. Priimta Briuselyje, 1998 m. liepos 29 d. Komisijos vardu Mario MONTI Komisijos narys 02/9 t. LT Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys 33 37 priedas iš dalies keičiamas taip: I PRIEDAS 1. II antraštinės dalies A ir C skirsnių 44 langelyje esančios paaiškinamosios pastabos papildomos šiomis pastraipomis: „Nuo 1999 m. sausio 1 d. valstybėse narėse pateiktų deklaracijų, kurios suteikia ūkio subjektams galimybę pildant muitinės deklaracijas pasirinkti naudoti euro piniginį vienetą, šiame langelyje, pageidautina skiltyje, esančioje apatinėje dešinėje dalyje, bus nurodoma, koks piniginis vienetas – nacionalinis ar euras – yra naudojamas. Valstybės narės gali numatyti, kad ši nuoroda 44 langelyje būtų įrašoma tik pirmajai deklaracijoje nurodomai prekių rūšiai. Tokiu atveju laikoma, kad ši informacija galioja visoms deklaracijoje pateikiamoms prekių rūšims. Ši nuoroda pateikiama pagal ISO–alpha-3 valiutos kodą (ISO 4217)“. 2. II antraštinės dalies A skirsnio 46 langelio paaiškinamosios pastabos pirmoji pastraipa pakeičiama taip: „Įrašykite statistinę vertę, išreikštą ta valiuta, kurios kodas gali būti 44 langelyje, arba, jei jo nėra 44 langelyje, tos valstybės narės valiuta, kurioje užbaigiami eksporto formalumai, atsižvelgiant į galiojančias Bendrijos nuostatas“. 3. II antraštinės dalies A skirsnio 47 langelio paaiškinamoji pastaba užbaigiama šia pastraipa, kuri įterpiama po esamu tekstu: „Šiame langelyje sumos yra išreiškiamos ta valiuta, kurios kodas gali būti 44 langelyje, arba, jei jo nėra 44 langelyje, tos valstybės narės valiuta, kurioje užbaigiami eksporto formalumai“. 4. II antraštinės dalies C dalies 45 langelio paaiškinamoji pastaba užbaigiama šia pastraipa, kuri įterpiama po esamu tekstu: „Šiame langelyje sumos yra išreiškiamos ta valiuta, kurios kodas gali būti 44 langelyje, arba, jei jo nėra 44 langelyje, paskirties šalies narės valiuta“. 5. II antraštinės dalies C dalies 46 langelio paaiškinamosios pastabos pirmoji pastraipa pakeičiama taip: „Įrašykite statistinę vertę, išreikštą ta valiuta, kurios kodas gali būti 44 langelyje, arba, jei jo nėra 44 langelyje, paskirties valstybės narės valiuta, atsižvelgiant į galiojančias Bendrijos nuostatas“. 6. II antraštinės dalies C skirsnio 47 langelio paaiškinamoji pastaba užbaigiama šia pastraipa, kuri įterpiama po esamu tekstu: „Šiame langelyje sumos yra išreiškiamos ta valiuta, kurios kodas gali būti 44 langelyje, arba, jei jo nėra 44 langelyje, paskirties valstybės narės valiuta“. 34 LT Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys 02/9 t. 38 priedas iš dalies keičiamas taip: II PRIEDAS 22 langelyje esanti paaiškinamoji pastaba (sąskaitos faktūros valiuta) pakeičiama taip: „Sąskaitos faktūros valiuta turi būti nurodoma ISO alpha-3 valiutos kodu (ISO 4217). Tačiau valstybės narės gali ir toliau naudoti trejetainį geonomenklatūros kodą, patvirtintą remiantis Tarybos reglamento (EB) Nr. 1172/959 (1) (1) OL L 118, 1995 5 25, p. 10. “ 02/9 t. LT Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys 35 III PRIEDAS 87 priedas papildomas šiuo punktu: Eilės Nr. Prekės, kurias perdirbti leidžiama muitinei prižiūrint Perdirbimas, kurį galima atlikti 1 skiltis 2 skiltis „18 Bet kurios rūšies elektroninio tipo komponen- tai, dalys, mazgai (įskaitant surenkamuosius ir mazgus) arba medžiagos neelektroninės), kurie yra būtini elektroniniam perdirbto produkto darbui (elektroninės Perdirbimas į informacijos technologijų produk- tus, kurie klasifikuojami: 1. KN subpozicijoje, esančioje Tarybos spren- dimo 97/359/EB (*) „EB-ITA-plane CXL“, jei atleidimas nuo muito galioja leidimo išda- vimo dieną, arba 2. KN subpozicijoje, numatytoje Tarybos regla- mento (EB) Nr. 2216/97 (**) 1, 2 ir 3 straips- niuose, jei autonominis muitų sustabdymas galioja leidimo išdavimo dieną (*) OL L 155, 1997 6 12, p. 1 (Susitarimas dėl informa- cijos technologijų). (**) OL L 305, 1997 11 8, p. 1. “