title: 1999/89/EG: Beschikking van de Commissie van 25 januari 1999 betreffende de procedure voor de conformiteitsverklaring van voor de bouw bestemde producten overeenkomstig artikel 20, lid 2, van Richtlijn 89/106/EEG van de Raad met betrekking tot bouwpakketten voor geprefabriceerde trappen (kennisgeving geschied onder nummer C(1999) 113) (Voor de EER relevante tekst)

eurovoc_concepts:
Community certification
EU trade mark
building materials
prefabrication
producer's liability
product safety
production control
quality label
resistance of materials
technical specification

formats: html pdf print

text: L 29/34 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen 3. 2. 1999 BESCHIKKING VAN DE COMMISSIE van 25 januari 1999 betreffende de procedure voor de conformiteitsverklaring van voor de bouw bestemde producten overeenkomstig artikel 20, lid 2, van Richtl¶n 89/106/EEG van de Raad met betrekking tot bouwpakketten voor geprefabriceerde trappen (kennisgeving geschied onder nummer C(1999) 113) (Voor de EER relevante tekst) (1999/89/EG) DE COMMISSIE VAN DE EUROPESE GEMEENSCHAPPEN, Gelet op het Verdrag tot oprichting van de Europese Gemeenschap, Gelet op Richtl¶n 89/106/EEG van de Raad van 21 december 1988 betreffende de onderlinge aanpassing van en bestuursrechtel¶ke bepalingen der de wettel¶ke lidstaten inzake voor de bouw bestemde producten (1), gew¶zigd b¶ Richtl¶n 93/68/EEG (2), inzonderheid op artikel 13, lid 4, Overwegende dat de Commissie b¶ de keuze tussen de twee in artikel 13, lid 3, van Richtl¶n 89/106/EEG bedoelde procedures voor de conformiteitsverklaring van een product de „minst kostbare veiligheidsconforme procedure” moet kiezen; dat dit inhoudt dat het noodza- kel¶k is vast te stellen of voor een bepaald product of bepaalde familie van producten het bestaan van een onder de verantwoordel¶kheid van de fabrikant vallend produc- tiecontrolesysteem in de fabriek een noodzakel¶ke en toereikende voorwaarde is voor een conformiteitsverkla- ring, dan wel of daarvoor, om redenen die verband houden met de naleving van de in artikel 13, lid 4, genoemde criteria, een erkende certificatie-instantie moet worden ingeschakeld; Overwegende dat artikel 13, lid 4, voorschr¶ft, dat de aldus gekozen procedure in de mandaten en technische specificaties moet worden genoemd; dat het derhalve wensel¶k is het in de mandaten en technische specifica- ties gebruikte begrip producten of families van producten vast te leggen; Overwegende dat de twee procedures van artikel 13, lid 3, nader in b¶lage III b¶ Richtl¶n 89/106/EEG z¶n beschreven; dat het derhalve noodzakel¶k is voor elk product of elke familie van producten duidel¶k de methoden voor de toepassing van de twee procedures aan te geven, onder verw¶zing naar genoemde b¶lage III, daar b¶lage III aan bepaalde systemen de voorkeur geeft; Overwegende dat de procedure van artikel 13, lid 3, onder a), overeenkomt met de systemen die in mogel¶kheid 1, zonder permanente bewaking, en in de mogel¶kheden 2 en 3 van punt 2, onder ii), van b¶lage III z¶n vastgelegd en dat de procedure van artikel 13, lid 3, onder b), over- eenkomt met de systemen die in punt 2, onder i), van b¶lage III en in mogel¶kheid 1, met permanente bewa- king, van punt 2, onder ii), van b¶lage III z¶n vastgelegd; Overwegende dat de in deze beschikking vervatte maatre- gelen in overeenstemming z¶n met het advies van het Permanent Comit(cid:130) voor de bouw, HEEFT DE VOLGENDE BESCHIKKING GEGEVEN: Artikel 1 De conformiteit van de in b¶lage I genoemde producten wordt vastgesteld aan de hand van een procedure waarb¶, naast een door de fabrikant uitgevoerd productiecontrole- systeem in de fabriek, b¶ de beoordeling en de bewaking van de productiecontrole of van het product zelf een erkende certificatie-instantie wordt ingeschakeld. Artikel 2 De procedure voor de conformiteitsverklaring overeen- komstig b¶lage II wordt vermeld in de mandaten voor richtsnoeren voor Europese technische goedkeuringen. Artikel 3 Deze beschikking is gericht tot de lidstaten. Gedaan te Brussel, 25 januari 1999. Voor de Commissie Martin BANGEMANN Lid van de Commissie (1) PB L 40 van 11. 2. 1989, blz. 12. (2) PB L 220 van 30. 8. 1993, blz. 1. 3. 2. 1999 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen L 29/35 B(cid:246)LAGE I Bouwpakketten voor geprefabriceerde trappen (de volledige trap wordt als bouwpakket in de handel gebracht, met geprefabriceerde treden en andere onderdelen) (1) — voor gebruik in woningen en andere gebouwen. (1) Monolithische betonnen en stalen trappen niet inbegrepen. Ook traditioneel vervaardigde geprefabriceerde trappen van massief hout voor gebruik binnen afzonderl¶ke gebouwen vallen niet onder deze beschikking. L 29/36 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen 3. 2. 1999 B(cid:246)LAGE II VERKLARING VAN OVEREENSTEMMING Opmerking: voor producten uit onderstaande productfamilies met meer dan (cid:130)(cid:130)n beoogd gebruik, z¶n de taken voor de erkende instantie, gebaseerd op de relevante systemen van verklaring van overeenkomst, cumulatief. PRODUCTFAMILIE BOUWPAKKETTEN VOOR GEPREFABRICEERDE TRAPPEN (1/2) 1. Systemen van verklaring van overeenstemming De EOTA (Europese Organisatie voor technische goedkeuring) wordt verzocht om in de desbetreffende richtsnoeren voor Europese technische goedkeuringen voor de onderstaande producten en het beoogde gebruik daarvan het volgende systeem van verklaring van overeenstemming te vermelden: Product Beoogd gebruik Niveau(s) of klasse(n) Systeem van verklaring van overeenstemming Bouwpakketten voor ceerde trappen geprefabri- woningen Voor gebouwen en andere — 2+ Systeem 2+: zie Richtl¶n 89/106/EEG, b¶lage III, punt 2, ii), eerste mogel¶kheid, met onder meer certificatie van de in de fabriek uitgevoerde productiecontrole door een erkende instantie op basis van een initi(cid:137)le inspectie van de fabriek en van de productiecontrole in de fabriek alsmede van permanente bewaking, beoordeling en erkenning van de productiecontrole in de fabriek. De specificatie van het systeem dient zodanig te z¶n dat het kan worden toegepast zelfs wanneer de prestatie ten aanzien van een bepaalde eigenschap niet behoeft te worden vastgesteld, omdat minstens (cid:130)(cid:130)n lidstaat voor een dergel¶ke eigenschap geen wettel¶k voorschrift heeft (zie artikel 2, lid 1, van Richtl¶n 89/106/EEG en, wanneer van toepassing, punt 1. 2. 3 van de basisdocumenten). In die gevallen is de verificatie van een dergel¶ke eigenschap voor de fabrikant niet verplicht indien h¶ in dit opzicht niets over de prestatie van dit product wenst mee te delen. 3. 2. 1999 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen L 29/37 PRODUCTFAMILIE BOUWPAKKETTEN VOOR GEPREFABRICEERDE TRAPPEN (2/2) 1. Systemen van verklaring van overeenstemming De EOTA (Europese Organisatie voor technische goedkeuring) wordt verzocht om in de desbetreffende richtsnoeren voor Europese technische goedkeuringen voor de onderstaande producten en het beoogde gebruik daarvan het volgende systeem van verklaring van overeenstemming te vermelden: Product Beoogd gebruik Niveau(s) of klasse(n) Systeem van verklaring van overeenstemming Bouwpakketten voor geprefabri- ceerde trappen Voor toepassingen die onder- worpen zijn aan de brandpres- tatievoorschriften A (1), B (1), C (1) A (2), B (2), C (2) A (3), D, E, F 1 3 4 Systeem 1: zie Richtlijn 89/106/EEG, b¶lage III, punt 2, i), zonder steekproefsgewijze controle van monsters. Systeem 3: zie Richtlijn 89/106/EEG, bijlage III, punt 2, ii), mogelijkheid 2. Systeem 4: zie Richtlijn 89/106/EEG, bijlage III, punt 2, ii), mogelijkheid 3. (1) Materialen waarvan de brandprestaties tijdens het productieproces kunnen veranderen (doorgaans materialen waarvan de chemische samenstelling kan veranderen, bijv. brandvertragende producten, of waarvan wijziging van de samenstelling tot wijziging van de brandprestaties kan leiden). (2) Materialen waarvan de brandprestaties tijdens het productieproces niet kunnen veranderen. (3) Materialen van klasse A die volgens Beschikking 96/603/EG niet op brandprestaties dienen te worden getest. De specificatie van het systeem dient zodanig te z¶n dat het kan worden toegepast zelfs wanneer de prestatie ten aanzien van een bepaalde eigenschap niet behoeft te worden vastgesteld, omdat minstens (cid:130)(cid:130)n lidstaat voor een dergel¶ke eigenschap geen wettel¶k voorschrift heeft (zie artikel 2, lid 1, van Richtl¶n 89/106/EEG en, wanneer van toepassing, punt 1. 2. 3 van de basisdocumenten). In die gevallen is de verificatie van een dergel¶ke eigenschap voor de fabrikant niet verplicht indien h¶ in dit opzicht niets over de prestatie van dit product wenst mee te delen


title: Règlement (CE, CECA, Euratom) nº 183/1999 du Conseil du 25 janvier 1999 modifiant le règlement (CE, Euratom, CECA) nº 840/95 modifiant le règlement (CEE, Euratom, CECA) nº 2290/77 portant fixation du régime pécuniaire des membres de la Cour des comptes

eurovoc_concepts:
European official
member of the Court of Auditors (EU)
pay
pension scheme

formats: fmx4 html pdf print xhtml

text: 28. 1. 1999 FR Journal officiel des Communaut(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes L 21/1 I (Actes dont la publication est une condition de leur applicabilit(cid:130)) R(cid:221)GLEMENT (CE, CECA, EURATOM) No 183/1999 DU CONSEIL du 25 janvier 1999 modifiant le r(cid:138)glement (CE, Euratom, CECA) no 840/95 modifiant le r(cid:138)glement (CEE, Euratom, CECA) no 2290/77 portant fixation du r(cid:130)gime p(cid:130)cuniaire des membres de la Cour des comptes LE CONSEIL DE L’UNION EUROP(cid:144)ENNE, vu le trait(cid:130) instituant la Communaut(cid:130) europ(cid:130)enne, et notamment son article 188 B, paragraphe 8, la Communaut(cid:130) europ(cid:130)ene du vu le trait(cid:130) instituant charbon et de l’acier, et notamment son article 45 B, paragraphe 8, vu le trait(cid:130) instituant la Communaut(cid:130) europ(cid:130)enne de l’(cid:130)nergie atomique, et notamment son article 160 B, para- graphe 8, consid(cid:130)rant qu’il appartient au Conseil de fixer les traite- indemnit(cid:130)s et pensions du pr(cid:130)sident et des ments, membres de la Cour des comptes; consid(cid:130)rant que le r(cid:138)glement (CE, Euratom, CECA) no 840/95 (1) a modifi(cid:130) les dispositions du r(cid:138)glement (CEE, Euratom, CECA) no 2290/77 (2) relatives au traite- ment et aux indemnit(cid:130)s transitoires de cessation des fonc- tions et a pr(cid:130)vu, (cid:133) son article 2, qu’il ne modifiait pas les pensions acquises (cid:133) sa date d’entr(cid:130)e en vigueur; consid(cid:130)rant que, le Tribunal de premi(cid:138)re instance, dans son arr(cid:136)t du 30 septembre 1998, dans l’affaire T-121/97, a constat(cid:130) l’ill(cid:130)galit(cid:130) de l’article 2 du r(cid:138)glement susvis(cid:130) et qu’il convient d(cid:138)s lors de modifier le r(cid:138)glement (CE, Euratom, CECA) no 840/95 pour rem(cid:130)dier (cid:133) cette ill(cid:130)ga- lit(cid:130), A ARR(cid:219)T(cid:144) LE PR(cid:144)SENT R(cid:221)GLEMENT: Article premier L’article 2 du r(cid:138)glement (CE, Euratom, CECA) no 840/95 est remplac(cid:130) par le texte suivant: «Article 2 Les pensions acquises avant le 1er novembre 1993 ne sont pas modifi(cid:130)es par le pr(cid:130)sent r(cid:138)glement. » Article 2 Le pr(cid:130)sent r(cid:138)glement entre en vigueur le jour suivant celui de sa publication au Journal officiel des Commu- naut(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes. Le pr(cid:130)sent r(cid:138)glement est obligatoire dans tous ses (cid:130)l(cid:130)ments et directement applicable dans tout (cid:144)tat membre. Fait (cid:133) Bruxelles, le 25 janvier 1999. Par le Conseil Le pr(cid:130)sident J. FISCHER (1) JO L 85 du 19. 4. 1995, p. 10. (2) JO L 268 du 20. 10. 1977, p. 1. R(cid:138)glement modifi(cid:130) en dernier lieu par le r(cid:138)glement (CE, Euratom, CECA) no 840/95


title: 1999/173/EC: Council Decision of 25 January 1999 adopting a specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration on improving the human research potential and the socioeconomic knowledge base (1998 to 2002)

eurovoc_concepts:
EU programme
research programme
research staff
socioeconomic conditions
technological change
vocational training

text: 12. 3. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 64/105 COUNCIL DECISION of 25 January 1999 adopting a specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration on improving the human research potential and the socioeconomic knowledge base (1998 to 2002) (1999/173/EC) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 130i(4) thereof, Having regard Commission (1), to the proposal from the Having regard to the opinion of Parliament (2), the European Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (3), of fifth framework programme (1) Whereas by Decision No 182/1999/EC (4), the European Parliament and the Council adopted the the European Community (hereinafter referred to as the fifth framework programme) for research, technological development and demonstration (hereinafter activities for the period 1998 to 20002 setting out the general outlines and scientific and technological objectives of the activities to be carried out in improving the human research the field of potential and the socioeconomic knowledge base; referred to as RTD) the framework through programme specific (2) Whereas Article 130i(3) of the Treaty stipulates shall be that programmes implemented developed within each activity under the framework programme, and that each specific programme shall define the detailed rules for implementing it, fix its duration and provide for the means deemed necessary; (1) OJ C 260, 18. 8. 1998, p. 87. (2) Opinion delivered on 15 December 1998 (not yet published in the Official Journal). (3) OJ C 407, 28. 12. 1998, p. 123. (4) OJ L 26, 1. 2. 1999, p. 1. (3) Whereas, research, technological development in accordance with Article 4(2) of the European Decision No 1110/94/EC of Parliament and of the Council of 26 April 1994 concerning the fourth framework programme of the European Community activities in the field of and demonstration (1994 to 1998) (5) and Article 4(2) of specific programmes implementing the fourth framework programme, the Commission has arranged for an external assessment to be conducted which it has the transmitted to the European Parliament, Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions together with its conclusions and comments; the Council Decisions on the (4) Whereas, in accordance with Article 130j of the Treaty, Council Decision 1999/65/EC of 22 December 1998 concerning the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities and for the dissemination of research results for the implementation of the the European fifth framework programme of (hereinafter Community for participation referred to as rules to this and dissemination’) applies specific programme; whereas rules allow the these participation of the Joint Research Centre in the specific covered indirect programme; (1998 to 2002) (6) actions (cid:28)the this by (5) Whereas, for the purpose of implementing this programme, in addition to cooperation covered by the Agreement on the European Economic Area or by an Association Agreement, it may be appropriate international engage cooperation activities, in particular on the basis of Article 130m of the Treaty, with third countries or international organisations; to in (6) Whereas implementation of this programme will also comprise activities and mechanisms aimed stimulating, disseminating and exploiting at in particular vis-a` -vis small and RTD results, medium-sized enterprises (SMEs); (5) OJ L 126, 18. 5. 1994, p. 1. Decision as last amended by Decision No 2535/97/EC (OJ L 347, 18. 12. 1997, p. 1). (6) OJ L 26, 1. 2. 1999, p. 46. L 64/106 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 12. 3. 1999 it that is and important user the scientific, (7) Whereas industrial should contribute substantially to the definition of activities to be undertaken and should be involved, as appropriate, in the implementation of this programme; communities (8) Whereas fifth research activities under framework programme should also be geared towards innovation in order to contribute, inter alia, to the objectives of the first action plan for innovation; the (9) Whereas the improvement of human potential is an essential enhancement of competitiveness, innovation and employment in the Community; in the factor (10) Whereas special emphasis should be placed on encouraging the participation of SMEs; knowledge base (hereinafter referred to as the specific programme) is hereby adopted for the period from 25 January 1999 to 31 December 2002. Article 2 In accordance with Annex III to the fifth 1. framework programme, the amount deemed necessary for carrying out the specific programme is EUR 1 280 million, including a maximum of 6,55 % for the Commission’s administrative expenditure. An indicative breakdown of this amount is given in Annex I. 2. Of the amount in paragraph 1: — EUR 293 million is for the period 1998 to 1999, (11) Whereas the equal opportunities policy of the Community must be taken into account in the implementation of the programme; and (12) Whereas efficient and transparent management contributes to a more effective and user-friendly programme; (13) Whereas administrative expenditure should be included in the Community budget in a transparent fashion; — EUR 987 million is for the period 2000 to 2002. In the case referred to in Article 2(1)(c) of the fifth framework programme, the Council shall adapt the latter figure in accordance with Article 2(1)(c), second indent of the fifth framework programme. Pending a decision by the Council, this specific programme shall not be implemented beyond the provision of the first indent. (14) Whereas the implementation of this programme should be monitored with a view to adapting it, where appropriate, to scientific and technological developments; whereas there should also be an assessment of progress with the programme by independent experts; in due course (15) Whereas the Scientific and Technical Research Committee has been consulted on the scientific and specific content programmes, technological the of HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Article 1 In accordance with Article 3(1) of the fifth framework programme, the specific programme on improving the human research potential and the socioeconomic The budgetary authority shall, 3. in compliance with the scientific and technological objectives and priorities the laid down in this Decision, appropriations for each financial year taking into account resources within the multiannual financial perspective. the availability of set Article 3 the The general outlines, and 1. technological objectives and the priorities for the specific programme are set out in Annex II. They are consistent with the principles and the three categories of selection criteria indicated in Annex I to the fifth framework programme. scientific In accordance with these principles and criteria 2. the selection criteria indicated in Article 10 of the rules for participation and dissemination shall be applied for the selection of the RTD activities to be carried out. 12. 3. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 64/107 Selection criteria specific to this programme are given in Annex IV. (b) the indicative timetable for the implementation of the specific programme; these criteria shall be complied with in the All implementation of the programme, including the work programme referred to in Article 5(1), although they may be weighted differently. (c) the coordination arrangements set out in Annex III and arrangements to secure the objectives, related to innovation and the participation of SMEs, of the fifth framework programme; the third activity of The rules for participation and dissemination 3. shall apply to the specific programme. (d) where necessary, the selection criteria and the arrangements for applying them for each type of indirect RTD action. 4. The detailed rules for financial participation by the Community in the specific programme are those referred to in Article 4 of the fifth framework programme. indirect RTD actions The specific programme are defined in Annexes II and IV to the fifth framework programme. under the Specific rules for implementing the programme are set out in Annex III to this Decision. Article 4 In the light of the criteria referred to in Article 3, and the and priorities set out in Annex II, the Commission: technological objectives scientific and (a) shall monitor, with appropriate assistance from independent external experts, the implementation of the specific programme and, where appopriate, submit proposals to the Council for adapting it, in accordance with Article fifth framework programme; 5(1) the of in Article 5(2) of (b) shall arrange for the external assessment provided fifth framework conducted concerning the in the fields covered by for programme activities carried out the specific programme. to be the The work programme shall 2. take account of relevant interests, in particular the scientific, industrial and user communities. It shall serve as a basis for implementing the indirect RTD actions according to the procedures set out in the rules for participation and dissemination. The work programme shall be updated where 3. appropriate and be made available by the Commission to all in a user-friendly form, including in electronic form. interested parties Article 6 The Commission shall be responsible for the 1. implementation of this specific programme. The procedure laid down in Article 7 shall apply 2. for the adoption of the following measures: — the drawing-up and updating of the work programme referred to in Article 5(1), including regarding the content of calls for proposals, — approval of RTD actions proposed for funding, including participation by entities from third the countries, where the estimated amount of Community contribution under this programme is equal to or more than EUR 0,3 million, — the drawing-up of the terms of reference for the external assessment provided for in Article 5(2) of the fifth framework programme, Article 5 — any adjustment to the indicative breakdown of the amount as set out in Annex I. The Commission shall draw up a work 1. programme specifiying: Article 7 (a) in greater detail, the objectives and RTD priorities of Annex II; The Commission 1. a programme committee (hereinafter referred to as (cid:28)the assisted shall by be L 64/108 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 12. 3. 1999 composed of committee’) the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission. representatives of implementation of the specific programme, and shall in particular provide it with information about the progress of all RTD actions this programme. funded under In the cases referred to in Article 6(2), the Commission shall submit the 2. representative of to the committee a draft of measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft measures referred to above within a time limit which the Chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 148(2) of the Treaty in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article. The Chairman shall not vote. 3(a) The Commission shall adopt the measures they are in accordance with the envisaged if opinion of the committee. (b) If the measures envisaged are not in accordance the committee, or if no with the opinion of opinion is delivered, the Commission shall, without delay, submit to the Council a proposal relating to the measures to be taken. The Council shall act by a qualified majority. If, on expiry of a period of nine weeks from the referral of the matter to the Council, the Council has not acted, the proposed measures shall be adopted by the Commission. 4. committee The Commission shall of the overall regularly inform the the progress of be composed of committee will supported representatives a 5. The subcommittee from Member States. Its task will be to provide expert advice both on the implementation of socioeconomic research in this programme as well as to provide an overview of socioeconomic research across the whole of the framework programme. by Article 8 In accordance with Article 5(4) of the fifth framework programme, the Commission shall regularly inform the the Council and the European Parliament of overall progress of the implementation of the programme, including on the participation of SMEs and the simplification of admininistrative procedures. Article 9 This Decision is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, 25 January 1999. For the Council The President J. FISCHER 12. 3. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 64/109 ANNEX I INDICATIVE BREAKDOWN OF THE AMOUNT DEEMED NECESSARY Type of activity — Supporting training and mobility of researchers — Enhancing access to research infrastructures — Promoting scientific and technological excellence — Key action: improving the socioeconomic knowledge base — Support for the development of scientific and technology policies in Europe (million EUR) Amount 858 182 50 165 25 Total 1 280 L 64/110 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 12. 3. 1999 ANNEX II THE GENERAL OUTLINES, THE SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL OBJECTIVES AND THE PRIORITIES INTRODUCTION The world is increasingly based on knowledge. The Community’s prime asset in this area is the quality of its researchers, engineers and technicians. The aim is to preserve and help develop this knowledge potential through greater support for the training and mobility of researchers and by enhancing access to research infrastructures. The Community also has a solid tradition of research in social and economic science and the humanities, which needs to be mobilised to identify economic and social trends and requirements, both current and future, in order to contribute to the Community’s competitiveness and quality of life of its citizens. GENERAL OBJECTIVES The general objectives of this programme, to be realised in concert with related activities elsewhere in the framework programme, are centred on two main areas of activity, to improve the human research potential and to strengthen the socioeconomic knowledge base. To this end, actions will be undertaken: — to develop the Community’s human research potential, making special efforts to ensure equality of access and a better balance between men and women, notably through the training and mobility of researchers so as to contribute, inter alia , to efforts for creating new jobs, — to enhance access to research infrastructures, — to help make the Community an attractive location for researchers and to promote European research in the international arena and to promote a European scientific and technological culture, — to strengthen, through a specific key action, the socioeconomic knowledge base for a better understanding of key problems facing European society, — to help develop scientific and technological policies and other Community policies. 1. ACTIONS SPECIFIC TO THE PROGRAMME A. Improving human research potential ( i ) S u p p o r t i n g t r a i n i n g a n d m o b i l i t y o f r e s e a r c h e r s The individual and collective expertise of the Community’s researchers is a considerable asset. However, scientific research takes place in a strongly competitive worldwide environment and compared with our main competitors, the Community has a relative shortage of researchers; a rather high fragmentation and duplication of research effort; a certain isolation of research teams, particularly in the peripheral and less-favoured regions of the Community; a relatively low mobility of researchers, both geographically and between academia and industry; a general tendency towards an ageing workforce, which also affects the research field; and underuse of the potential of female scientists. 12. 3. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 64/111 To address these issues, (cid:28)Supporting training and mobility of researchers’ will concentrate on helping to create a European research area through the following overall objectives: stimulating training through research of young researchers, especially those in the early stages of their professional career; promoting equality of opportunities between women and men in the research field; promoting transnational cooperation between research teams, including interdisciplinary approaches, particularly through networking around a common research project; promoting the mobility of researchers throughout Europe; encouraging cooperation, interactions and staff mobility between academic and industrial research; and promoting the scientific and technological cohesion of the Community, particularly with respect to its less-favoured regions. This action of the programme will be implemented through two lines: research training networks and a coherent system of Marie Curie fellowships. They will be open to all fields of scientific research that contribute to the Community’s objectives in research, technological development and demonstration, for projects chosen freely by the participants themselves. In the selection of projects, there will be no pre-established target in terms of scientific discipline or topic — the selection being made on the criteria of scientific excellence and relevance to the objectives of the actions alone (i. e. a bottom-up approach). However, there will be an (ex-post) assessment of project allocation in relation to research areas and participation by men and women. Research training networks The primary objective is to promote training through research, especially of young researchers at pre-doctoral and at post-doctoral level, within the frame of high-quality transnational collaborative research projects, including those in emerging fields of research. Community support will be awarded both to reinforce the research teams of a network through the temporary appointment of young researchers coming from a country other than that of the team concerned and to contribute towards the costs of coordinating the collaborative research project on which the network is based. Each network will be required to define an appropriate training programme for its young researchers. Its training programme will take advantage of the international nature of the network and, when relevant, the multidisciplinarity of its joint project, the complementarity of its teams and the network’s connections with industry. Research training networks will promote the training of researchers in an industrially relevant environment as well as encourage interplay between academic and industrial research, where these features are relevant to the networks training programme. All networks will be required to offer equal opportunities to male and female researchers. System of Marie Curie fellowships This line consists of a coherent system of Marie Curie fellowships centred on individual fellowships for young high-quality researchers with the necessary research experience, awarded for topics chosen by the researchers themselves. This system is a focused attempt at a more efficient use of Community funding of fellowships for training through research. The researchers participating are of three categories: (i) postgraduates; (ii) young researchers with the necessary research experience; these are typically researchers with a doctoral degree or at least four years of (iii) experienced researchers; these are typically researchers with at least 10 years of research experience at post-doctoral level and who are established staff members of a research institution. This action will provide equal opportunities for men and women. full-time research experience at postgraduate level other than doctoral studies; Marie Curie individual fellowships The scheme will provide advanced training through research for the best of Europe’s young researchers with a view to these fellows becoming Europe’s leading researchers. The research institutions will host young researchers with the necessary research experience. In addition, after completion of a two-year individual fellows originating from a less-favoured region and who wish to return to a less-favoured region in their country of nationality may receive a return fellowship. fellowship, L 64/112 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 12. 3. 1999 Additional and complementary schemes include: Marie Curie industry host fellowships The scheme will provide young researchers with opportunities to carry out research in industrial or commercial environments. The aim is also to stimulate cooperation between industry and academia. The industrial and commercial enterprises will host postgraduates and young researchers with the necessary research experience. The host will be expected to provide adequate research facilities and supervision arrangements for the fellow. There will be special measures for SMEs in order to stimulate the participation of these enterprises in the scheme. Marie Curie development host fellowships The scheme will help develop high-level research capacity in research institutions in the less-favoured regions of the Community. Research institutions established in less-favoured regions with a need to develop new areas of competence will host young researchers with the necessary research experience. By this means the scientific and technological cohesion of the Community will be enhanced. Marie Curie experienced researchers fellowships This scheme will harness the expertise of Europe’s experienced researchers for the transfer of knowledge and technology between industry and academia (in both directions) and for similar transfer to the less-favoured regions. The experienced researcher will come from an industrial or commercial enterprise and go to a university or research centre, or vice versa; or will come from, or go to a research institution in a less-favoured region. Stays at Marie Curie training sites The scheme will provide young researchers pursuing their doctoral studies with the possibility to undertake part of them at a Marie Curie training site, and by this means optimising the use of specialist training sites in order to create Community added-value. ( i i ) E n h a n c i n g a c c e s s t o r e s e a r c h i n f r a s t r u c t u r e s Access to major research infrastructures is increasingly indispensable for researchers working at the forefront of science. The ability of European research teams to remain competitive with teams elsewhere in the world depends on their being supported by such state-of-the-art infrastructures. The term (cid:28)research infrastructures’ refers to facilities and establishments that provide essential services to the research community. for example, singular large-scale research installations, collections, special habitats, libraries, databases, integrated arrays of small research installations, as well as infrastructural centres of competence which provide a service for the wider research community based on an assembly of techniques and know-how. It covers, As most of the major research infrastructures in Europe are operated by national authorities principally for the benefit of their national researchers, access to these infrastructures is often restricted largely or even entirely to national research teams. The result is that researchers do not always have the opportunity to access the infrastructures in Europe most appropriate for their work. In addition, some scarce state-of-the-art facilities owned by industrial companies tend to be closed to researchers working outside the company. Another feature of Europe’s research infrastructures is the relatively low level of transnational cooperation that exists between infrastructure operators in many fields. A strong Community added-value would arise if the same culture of cooperation could be created among infrastructure operators as is now beginning to exist between Europe’s researchers. 12. 3. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 64/113 In the context that the construction and operation of infrastructures is the responsibility of national authorities, (cid:28)Enhancing access to research infrastructures’ has the following general objectives: — to sponsor new opportunities for transnational access to major research infrastructures of Community-wide interest, — to stimulate infrastructure operators and users to work together in order to make more effective use of research infrastructures and hence to improve the service they provide to the scientific community, — to arrange coordinating, supporting and accompanying actions that ensure consistency with related actions undertaken in other specific programmes. It will be open to infrastructures in all fields of scientific research that contribute to the Community’s objectives in research, technological development and demonstration, to the extent that such measures are not undertaken by other activities of the framework programme. It will be implemented primarily through an action to help researchers with transnational access to major research infrastructures. In there will be two complementary actions — infrastructure cooperation networks and addition, research infrastructure RTD projects. Transnational access to major research infrastructures The objective is to sponsor new opportunities for research teams (including individual researchers) to obtain access to the major research infrastructures most appropriate for their work, irrespective of where in the Member States or Associated States they or the infrastructure is located. To be considered for Community support, the infrastructure must provide a world-class service essential for the conduct of top quality research, must be rare in Europe, must have investment or operating costs that are relatively high in relation to those costs in its particular field, and must provide adequate scientific, technical and logistic support to external, particularly first-time, users. Community support will be awarded to the selected infrastructure operators for them to provide access to their facilities free of charge to transnational users. Each selected infrastructure operator will be expected to publicise widely the opportunities being offered and to arrange for an independent peer-review of proposals submitted to it based on scientific merit, where in addition priority is to be given to first-time users and to users coming from countries where no similar facility exists. As a general rule, users conducting proprietary research will not be supported under this action. An exception will, however, be made in the case of SMEs which wish to use a particular infrastructure for the first time. Infrastructure cooperation networks The objective is to catalyse the self-coordination and the pooling of resources between infrastructure operators in order to foster a culture of cooperation between them, to generate critical mass for research into higher performance techniques, to spread good practice, to promote common protocols and interoperability, to encourage complementarity and to stimulate the creation of (cid:28)distributed’ and (cid:28)virtual’ large facilities. instrumentation and technologies, Community support will be awarded to help coordinate those joint activities that could lead to the more effective use and exploitation of present and future infrastructures relevant to the network. Participants in these networks will be operators of research infrastructures, research teams in universities, in research centres and in industry, representatives of users of the infrastructures, and equipment manufacturers. Each network will be devoted to different aspects of Europe’s research infrastructures. Research infrastructure RTD projects The objective is to support cooperative research efforts that could have widespread significance at a Community level for enhancing access to and improving the service provided by infrastructures in a L 64/114 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 12. 3. 1999 particular field. Such RTD projects will be particularly encouraged when they are in support of the work of the infrastructure cooperation networks of this programme or of the precursor concerted actions of the earlier training and mobility of researchers’ programme. ( i i i ) P r o m o t i n g s c i e n t i f i c a n d t e c h n o l o g i c a l e x c e l l e n c e Scientific and technological excellence are essential prerequisites for Europe to succeed in the competitive environment of international research and scientific development. The promotion of excellence would be expected to encourage the best individuals and teams to become involved in and be committed to European research and to increase the visibility of outstanding research findings produced by European researchers. At the same time it will be important to improve the public understanding of science and research in society with the objective of creating a favourable environment for research and technological development, and in particular for activities carried out under Community framework programmes. Scientific activities and research can only succeed and have the expected beneficial impact if citizens develop a basic understanding of science and scientific issues and come to an overall positive perception of relevant activities and their results. Where possible, activities will build on and complement national activities. High-level scientific conferences High-level scientific conferences will contribute to the advancement of science through exchange and to create conditions for experienced researchers, working at the cutting edge of scientific and technological development, to impart their knowledge and experience to the younger generation. Scientific conferences will also create the framework for the networking of Community researchers active outside the Community to build up or preserve their contacts and scientific relations with colleagues in Europe. Scientific conferences may be organised as Euro-conferences, Euro-courses, Euro-workshops or Euro-summer schools. They will, as a general rule, be small-scale events. Bigger events may be supported with the objective of facilitating the participation of young researchers. Non-traditional forms of scientific conferencing such as electronic conferences will be encouraged. Scientific conferences will be open to all fields of scientific research on topics freely chosen by the researchers themselves. Distinctions for high-level research work These distinctions will give public recognition and visibility to researchers having successfully completed outstanding scientific or technological results from European collaborative research. Distinctions for younger people who have carried out remarkable scientific work while still in the secondary or tertiary educational system will motivate them to continue their efforts in the interest of Europe’s scientific and technological future and also encourage other individuals of the same age to take an active interest in science and research. Distinctions will be foreseen as follows: the Descartes Prize for outstanding scientific and technological achievements resulting from European collaborative research; an award to undergraduate students of higher education institutions in Europe having developed original scientific ideas or concepts in areas which are relevant to the advancement of European science; the European Union Contest for Young Scientists, catering for scientific talents in the age range 15 to 20 years, to be organised in conjunction with the appropriate (cid:28)public awareness’ activities. Raising public awareness The main objective will be to raise public awareness for scientific activities and technological developments, in particular those undertaken in European research programmes, and thereby bridge the gap between science in its European dimension and the public. This should help European citizens 12. 3. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 64/115 to better understand both the beneficial impact of science and technology on their day-to-day lives as well as limitations and possible implications of research and technological developments. The activity will also aim to increase scientists’ awareness of issues and subjects that are of concern to the public. Community support will be provided: to promote European networking and the exchange of best practice between successful projects and initiatives at national or regional level; to arrange for regular encounters between scientists and science communicators; to promote the participation of women in science; to support the organisation of a European Science and Technology Week as a showcase for the concerted and coordinated display of European efforts in science and research; to provide, via electronic networks and other appropriate means, information on topical scientific and technological subjects in a language that is understandable to the scientifically interested but non-specialist citizen. B. Key action: improving the socioeconomic knowledge base The European Union draws its strength both from the social and cultural diversities between its members as well as from the similarities of their experiences and common values. The Community also has a solid tradition of research in social and economic science and the humanities, which need to be mobilised to identify economic and social trends and requirements, both current and future, in order to contribute to the Community’s competitiveness and quality of life of its citizens. In a period of increasing challenges, such as unacceptable levels of unemployment, an ageing population, the globalisation of economies, an increase in inequalities, and a declining relative contribution to the world economy, European society will have to undergo changes towards achieving sustainable socioeconomic development, the improvement of the quality of life of all its citizens and to maintain and enhance Europe’s competitive position in the world. Social sciences must therefore be in a position to respond to these challenges, overcome national boundaries, through reinforcing cooperation between them and enhancing their analytical capacity and thereby supporting policy-making. Furthermore the process of European integration itself has given rise to a new object of study, European society, which is different from the sum of its components, although clearly dependent on them. The objective of this key action will be to improve our understanding of the structural changes taking place in the European society in order to identify ways of managing change and to involve European citizens more actively in shaping their own futures. This will involve the analysis of the main trends giving rise to these changes, the analysis of the relationships between technology, employment and society, the impact of new technologies on working conditions, the reappraisal of participation mechanisms for collective action at all levels of governance and the elaboration of new development strategies fostering growth of employment and economic and social cohesion. This key action covers a number of subjects linked to the general objectives of the framework programme and aims at defining the base for employment-generating social, economic and cultural development and for building a European knowledge society. These subjects should not be seen in isolation, but as interrelated parts of a coherent and comprehensive framework. Support will aim at developing a conceptual understanding of the processes described above, built on empirical, comparative and prospective research, including constructing and integrating data and indicator systems and establishing a common research infrastructure. These activities will therefore contribute to provide the policy decision-making process with a sound knowledge of the challenges facing Europe, of their main consequences and of possible policy options to tackle them. Societal trends and structural changes Against a background of profound structural, demographic and social changes, research within this theme will aim at elucidating the complex interactions between societal trends, life chances, changes in family structures, economic changes, labour-market institutions, cultural patterns and value systems, taking into account European regional diversities. The analysis will include the phenomena of xenophobia, racism and migration. Attention will be accorded on the impact on economic development, social integration, social protection and factors of social inequalities and discrimination. L 64/116 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 12. 3. 1999 The study of these interactions will provide a better understanding of the changing patterns of work and organisation of time, of the use of new types of atypical and part-time or temporary jobs, of the capacity of education and training to prepare individuals over their lifetime to a changing environment and to enhance knowledge of the gender issue in European society. Research work will provide a sound knowledge base and contribute to the formulation and development of the relevant European policies. Technology, society and employment interdependency and Research under this theme aims to understand better the relationship of embeddedness between technology and society and to contribute to an integrated approach to institutional and environmental planning and development. While the need for integrating social, concerns in the technological development process is now accepted, the possible options vary according to different kinds of technologies, the state of their development and diffusion in society. Research will be undertaken on methods of interaction between the various actors concerned — suppliers, users, advisory bodies, decision-makers and public authorities. An improved understanding of the deployment and the impact of technologies in various socioeconomic, territorial, institutional, political and cultural contexts in the Union is expected to arise from this work. Research will also examine the role of the public sector in the innovation process and how authorities interact with other partners. Attention will be paid to the relationships between technology and employment, in particular the new information and communications technologies and the new ways of organising production and labour, including newly emerging professions, the geographical location of employment, changes in the working conditions and in the workforce skills. The role of innovation in education and training, the concept of lifelong learning, as well as how education and training can stimulate innovation, promote employment, social integration and equal opportunities, will also be examined. Governance and citizenship In the context of European integration, there is a need to reassess the role of the different levels of governance in Europe (local, regional, national and supranational). The aim will be to analyse the mutual articulation of responsibility and accountability at all levels and their real capacity as agents of change, while allowing for the development of mechanisms of dialogue, deliberation and decision-making to ensure effective cooperation between all the actors concerned. Research will set out to explain to what extent the various types of economic and social regulation in Europe are the consequences of a specific socio-institutional and cultural construction, in order to define better European integration strategies. It will address both regulation by public authorities as initiatives and structures such as political parties, public interest groups and social well as civil partners. The examination of the role of public authorities will also cover the reassessment of their missions, and of the concept of public service and the notion of public interest. In this framework, the analysis of the evolution of welfare systems will be a key element. In these analyses of governance, the notion of political, economic and social power will also be taken into account. The analyses will be accompanied by the study of the concept of citizenship across Europe, and of types and systems of participation of citizens and regulation to which they give rise. Research will also analyse the influence of the various components of culture (traditions, language, history, heritage, religions, migrations) and of educational models on the development of values. Analysis at the level of the individual could complement, where appropriate, research in this area. The role of media in a global economy, in which international audiovisual cultural products are increasingly present, will also be examined. The analyses will examine the interrelationships between governance and citizenship. 12. 3. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 64/117 New development models fostering growth and employment This prospective work will seek to explore new sustainable development models to foster growth, job creation, equal opportunities, the reduction of inequalities and the improvement of quality of life. It will investigate the dynamics of creation and distribution of wealth and the role of the public sector in this context in a globalised economy where intangible and service factors predominate. This will involve the development of indicators and methodologies for assessing the social and economic added-value of the various production models, identifying competitiveness factors including human capital, and characterising the different policies best adapted to the European economic area, taking into account Europe’s regional divergencies, and to the evolution of Europe in the world economic relations. Research will concentrate on analyses of issues such as organisational innovations, new types of work and employment, including the working potential of older population, the responses to the increasing demand for services, the development of non-profit mutual supporting activities, and innovations in socioeconomic partners’ cooperation. Socioeconomic and demographic differences across Europe and the impact of the development models on economic and social cohesion will be included in the analysis. C. Support for the development of scientific and technology policies in Europe To fulfil the tasks conferred on it by the Treaty in the field of research and innovation, the European Union needs to increase its ability to anticipate the issues at stake for Europe in the field of science and technology by exploiting the resources available to it in this area more effectively. A considerable amount of research work and studies are carried out and indicators produced ahead of the framing of science and technology policy at national and European level. The inadequate interaction between very diverse national approaches, and the complexity and often transnational dimension of the issues addressed by the work in question call for networking and the collation and coordinated exploitation of results at European level in order to shed light on certain major issues in good time. In order to support the development of the specific base of knowledge about scientific and technology policy issues which is needed by both national and European decision-makers and other users, these activities provide a flexible, strategic intelligence-gathering, collating and evaluation service. By underpinning and complementing the activities carried out at national and international level, the information and experience between activities are decision-makers and researchers and enable knowledge to be put to better use. intended to promote exchange of the Strategic analysis of specific political issues This activity involves the provision of support for the analytical and collating work to be carried out on a limited number of specific issues relating to scientific and technology policy. This work will be carried out by groups of experts from specialised national and international organisations and include studies, seminars and conferences. They will also provide policy-makers with a source of scientific advice. The matters to be dealt with will be identified by decision-makers and other players concerned with science and technology policies in the following fields: — matters relating to the implications, for science and technology policies, of the challenges posed by scientific and technological change, globalisation, changes in social demands, the new forms of competition and cooperation between businesses, and job-creation and growth in a manner that is environmentally sound and contributes to social cohesion, — matters relating to how the objectives and priorities of these policies and the instruments used to implement them enable them to be tackled and analysis of their socioeconomic impact. L 64/118 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 12. 3. 1999 Common basis of science, technology and innovation indicators The design, coordination and assessment of RTD strategies in Europe require the availability of relevant and comparable indicators at different levels (national, regional, European, world), including indicators measuring progress towards sustainable development. This second type of activity, carried out in conjunction with the Statistical Office and the relevant Commission Services and in cooperation with the specialist institutes in Europe, should gradually establish a common European base of science, technology and innovation indicators. It will be a question of coordinating and funding the work needed in order to compile appropriate statistics and new indicators covering the Union and the main third countries; it will in this way be possible to make available to the authorities concerned in the Member States, the European and national parliamentary assessment offices, and the Commission Services and all interested parties, a coherent set of data sent electronically and accompanied by the services needed for their processing, analysis and proper use. 2. INTERACTION WITH RELATED ACTIONS IN THE OTHER FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME ACTIVITIES A major feature of this programme will consist of the coordination and support of relevant activities throughout the framework programme, concerning, in particular, researchers’ training, support for research infrastructures and the overall socioeconomic dimension of Community research. The thematic programmes makes horizontal coordination an important factor for the success of the framework programme. More specifically: socioeconomic research dimension within the vertical — for the Marie Curie fellowships: these could also be implemented by the thematic programmes. In implementation order to ensure consistency, common rules will apply concerning eligibility, modalities, legal and financial provisions, and a single entry point for the reception of proposals will be set up, — for major research infrastructures: consistency and complementarity of approach will be ensured with the relevant actions of the other specific programmes, — for socioeconomic research: coordination will be achieved through participation in the elaboration of the work programmes, support in the creation of appropriate evaluation mechanisms, in particular through the participation of socioeconomic scientists, and collection and dissemination of relevant information, in order to ensure that the socioeconomic dimension is consistently taken into account in the specific programmes, — for the activities in support of the development of science and technology policies in Europe: consistency and complementarity with the actions of the other specific programmes will be ensured through coordination, the use of harmonised instruments (e. g. policy-oriented thematic networks and expert panels) and a common approach for the dissemination of results (e. g. publications, seminars and conferences). 12. 3. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 64/119 ANNEX III SPECIFIC RULES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE PROGRAMME The specific programme will be implemented through the indirect RTD actions as provided for in Annexes II and IV of the fifth framework programme. In addition, the following rules specific to this programme will apply: 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS Supporting training and mobility of researchers Research training networks A research training network will normally consist of at least five mutually independent legal entities from at least three Member States or Associated States. Community funding will cover up to 100 % of the additional eligible costs connected with the temporary appointment of young researchers, both pre-doctoral and post-doctoral, and with coordinating the joint project on which the network is based. The maximum funding for a network as a whole will correspond to the cost of taking on a young researcher in each of its partners as well as making a contribution to the costs of coordinating the project. At least 60 % of the funding for each network will be attributed to the costs of appointing young researchers. Community support will normally not be granted to procure durable equipment nor to finance the research work itself. System of Marie Curie fellowships Only legal persons established and international organisations located in a Member State or Associated State are eligible to participate as host institutions. Researchers eligible to participate in the system of Marie Curie fellowships are of three categories, as defined in Annex II to this programme. They must be nationals of a Member State or an Associated State or residing in the Community for at least the last five years (1). The research will be undertaken in a country other than the one where the research fellow’s nationality and most recent centre of activity is located. Exceptions however shall apply, in cases where knowledge and technology will be transferred to the less-favoured regions for: — individual return fellows, — experienced researchers, provided that their research be undertaken in a country other than the one in which the experienced researcher is an established member of a research institution. M a r i e C u r i e i n d i v i d u a l f e l l o w s h i p s The application for an individual fellowship will be made by the fellow in conjunction with the host institution. The fellows will be selected by the Commission on the basis of the criteria stipulated in Annex IV of the present programme. The fellowships will be paid to the host institution in accordance with Annex IV to the fifth framework programme. The amount of the allowance for the fellow will be established for each Member State and Associated State taking into account both the high standard of the Marie Curie (1) Applicants for Marie Curie fellowships should ensure that they are able to fulfil the immigration and visa requirements for the Member State or Associated State in which they intend to undertake their fellowship. L 64/120 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 12. 3. 1999 fellows and the overall situation of researchers of a corresponding level in the host country; it will include a provision for proper social security expenses. Each host must ensure that the fellow is covered under the social security scheme which is applied to employed workers within the Member State or Associated State concerned, or under a social security scheme providing a protection which is at least comparable, in terms of level and scope. M a r i e C u r i e i n d u s t r y h o s t f e l l o w s h i p s The host institutions will be selected by the Commission on the basis of the criteria stipulated in Annex IV to the present programme. The fellows will subsequently be selected by the host institution. The Commission will establish detailed criteria, concerning notably qualification and equal access opportunities to be followed by the industry host in the selection of fellows. Before a fellowship contract is offered, the selected fellows will have to be confirmed by the Commission. A joint funding from the Community and the host institution will enable the host institution to finance postgraduates and young researchers with the necessary research experience. M a r i e C u r i e d e v e l o p m e n t h o s t f e l l o w s h i p s The host institutions will be selected by the Commission on the basis of the criteria stipulated in Annex IV to the present programme. The fellows will subsequently be selected by the host institution. The Commission will establish detailed criteria, concerning notably qualification and equal access opportunities to be followed by the host in the selection of fellows. Before a fellowship contract is offered, the selected fellows will have to be confirmed by the Commission. Community funding will enable the host institution to finance young researchers with the necessary research experience. M a r i e C u r i e e x p e r i e n c e d r e s e a r c h e r s ’ f e l l o w s h i p s The application for an experienced researcher fellowship will be made by the fellow in conjunction with the host institution. The experienced researchers will be selected by the Commission on the basis of the criteria stipulated in Annex IV to the present programme. Community funding will enable the host institution to finance an experienced researcher. S t a y s a t M a r i e C u r i e t r a i n i n g s i t e s A training site is a clearly identifiable part of a research organisation, such as a research group or interrelated research groups. The training site must be internationally recognised within its respective field and have proven experience in doctoral training, particularly the training of postgraduate students from abroad. In addition, organisers of international doctoral studies, in the framework of a formal collaboration between participating organisations in different countries having the form of certain common requirements for achieving the doctoral degree, are considered possible training sites. The training sites will be selected by the Commission on the basis of the criteria stipulated in Annex IV to the present programme. The young researchers will subsequently be selected by the training site. The Commission will establish detailed criteria, concerning notably qualification and equal access opportunities to be followed by the training site in the selection of fellows. Before a fellowship contract is offered, the selected fellows will have to be confirmed by the Commission. The young researchers must be pursuing doctoral studies in a country other than that of the host institution in a subject area similar to that of the training site. They must undertake the period of training at the training site as an integral part of their doctoral studies. Community funding will enable the training site to finance short stays for the young researchers of a maximum duration of an academic year. 12. 3. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 64/121 Enhancing access to research infrastructures Transnational access to major research infrastructures Participants in this line will be legal entities which operate major research infrastructure. International organisations operating major research infrastructure in the Member States or Associated States may exceptionally participate with financing from the programme provided that the access being financed by the programme is both complementary to the mission of the organisation concerned and not eligible for support from the organisation’s own financial resources. Community funding is intended to cover 100 % of the travel and subsistence costs of visits to the infrastructure by teams of researchers working in Member States and Associated States other than the State where the owner and operator of the facility is located. Community funding will also cover up to 100 % of the additional eligible costs of providing teams of researchers with access to the infrastructure; such costs will be calculated either on the basis of a unit user-fee to be negotiated with each infrastructure operator and to be derived from its direct operating costs, or on the basis of the actual additional costs connected with making the facility available to the visiting teams of researchers. Eligible costs will exclude all contributions to capital costs. Infrastructure cooperation networks Infrastructure cooperation networks will be implemented as thematic networks. Each network will contain at least three mutually independent legal entities which operate research infrastructure from at least three different countries of the Member States and Associated States and will be coordinated by a legal entity which operates a research infrastructure. Research infrastructure RTD projects RTD projects will contain at least two mutually independent legal entities which operate research infrastructure in at least two countries of the Member States and Associated States. The project will be coordinated by a legal entity which operates a research infrastructure. Concerted actions The Commission may initiate, in conjunction with legal entities which operate research infrastructure and are contractors under this programme (or under the earlier training and mobility of researchers programme), concerted actions, to encourage the exchange of information between infrastructure operators and researchers from Member States or Associated States on subjects of common interest, complementing national and international efforts. Promoting scientific and technological excellence High-level scientific conferences Participants in this line will be legal entities from all fields of scientific endeavour who wish to organise a scientific conference, involving researchers from a cross-section of the respective scientific community. Community funding is intended to contribute to organisational costs, to the participation of speakers or teaching staff and to cover up to 100 % of expenses related to the participation of young researchers in the selected event. Support will also be made available to facilitate the participation of researchers who are nationals of one of the Member States and Associated States and who at the time of the event are active in laboratories or institutions outside Member States or Associated States. Distinctions for high-level research work Participants in the Descartes Prize will be researchers who have obtained outstanding scientific or technological results from European collaborative research. L 64/122 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 12. 3. 1999 Participants in the award for undergraduate students of higher education institutions and in the European Union Contest for Young Scientists will be legal entities, organising corresponding procedures at national level and young people whose projects have been selected in that frame. Community funding will cover up to 100 % of costs related to the preparation and organisation of appropriate selection procedures, including the awarding of monetary prizes or equivalent recognition to the most deserving projects. 2. ACCOMPANYING MEASURES The accompanying measures will comprise in particular: — studies in support of the specific programme including the preparation of future activities, including on strategic issues arising in the course of the programme, — exchanges of information, conferences, seminars, workshops, round tables, study panels, — recourse to external expertise in particular for the purposes of the monitoring of the specific the external programme provided for in Article 5(1) of assessment of the actions provided for in Article 5(2) of the fifth framework programme, the evaluation of indirect RTD actions and the monitoring of their implementation, the fifth framework programme, — dissemination, information and communication activities, including scientific publications and activities for the promotion and exploitation of results and the transfer of technology, — the promotion of the identity and prestige of Marie Curie fellows, especially through the Marie Curie Fellowship Association, — support in order to bring together potential participants for the purpose of elaborating a detailed work plan for a research proposal, in particular as a means of stimulating proposals in newly emerging fields of science and technology or in novel transdisciplinary approaches, or in fields where there is little history of transnational cooperation, — support for schemes to provide information and assistance to research players, including SMEs. 3. COORDINATION ARRANGEMENTS The Commission will endeavour to ensure complementarity between the indirect RTD actions under the programme, in particular by grouping them around a common objective, and to avoid duplication, while respecting the legitimate interests of proposers of indirect RTD actions. As far as possible, coordination will also be ensured between actions under the specific programme and those carried out in: — other specific programmes implementing the fifth framework programme, — the research and training programmes implementing Council Decision 1999/64/Euratom of 22 December 1998 concerning the fifth framework programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) for research and training activities (1998 to 2002) (1), — other European research frameworks including Eureka and COST, (1) OJ L 26, 1. 2. 1999, p. 34. 12. 3. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 64/123 — other Community research-related instruments such as PHARE, TACIS, MEDA, the EIF, the Structural Funds, the EIB and programmes in the field of education, training and youth. It will comprise: (i) the identification of common themes or priorities, resulting in particular in: — the exchange of information, — the carrying out of work decided on jointly, entailing in particular the joint initiation of one of the procedures referred to in Article 9 of the rules for participation and dissemination; (ii) the reassignment of proposals for indirect RTD actions between specific programmes or between a specific programme and a research and training programme. L 64/124 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 12. 3. 1999 ANNEX IV SELECTION CRITERIA FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAMME The specific selection criteria for certain parts of this programme, which supplement those referred to in Article 3, are the following: Supporting the training and mobility of researchers Research training networks Networks will be selected on the basis of the scientific merit of the collaborative research project on which the network is based and the quality and content of the network’s training programme. Networks promoting interactions between different disciplines and those containing complementary teams as well as those involving meaningful connections with industry will be preferred over networks of otherwise equal merit, where these features are relevant to the network’s training programme. System of Marie Curie fellowships M a r i e C u r i e i n d i v i d u a l f e l l o w s h i p s The selection criteria will include the research experience and the aptitude of the candidate, the impact and benefit of the training for the candidate, the research quality of the hosting research group, the ability of the host to meet the specific research training needs of the candidate, and the scientific and technological quality and relevance of the project. For return fellowships, the selection criteria will include the results and research experience gained by the candidate during the initial fellowship, and the benefit to the new hosting research group. M a r i e C u r i e i n d u s t r y h o s t f e l l o w s h i p s The host institutions will be selected by the Commission. The fellows will subsequently be selected by the host institution. The Commission will establish detailed criteria, concerning notably qualification and equal access opportunities, to be followed by the industry host in the selection of fellows. Before a fellowship contract is offered, the selected fellows will have to be confirmed by the Commission. The selection criteria will include the research quality of the host, the ability to provide adequate training, supervision arrangements and research facilities for the fellow, collaborative arrangements with other research organisations, and the scientific and technological quality and relevance of the proposed research area. The fellows will be selected by the host on the basis of their scientific ability and on the compatibility of their research experience with the proposed research area. M a r i e C u r i e d e v e l o p m e n t h o s t f e l l o w s h i p s The host institutions will be selected by the Commission. The fellows will subsequently be selected by the host institution. The Commission will establish detailed criteria, concerning notably qualification and equal access opportunities to be followed by the development host in the selection of fellows. Before a fellowship contract is offered, the selected fellows will have to be confirmed by the Commission. The selection criteria will include the relevance and impact of the competence which is sought, the compatibility of the new competence with the existing competence of the host, the appropriate size of the hosting research group in order to allow adequate working conditions for the fellows, and the international nature of the research activities of the hosting research group. 12. 3. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 64/125 The fellows will be selected by the host on the basis of their scientific ability and on the compatibility of their research experience with the needs of the host. M a r i e C u r i e e x p e r i e n c e d r e s e a r c h e r s ’ f e l l o w s h i p s The selection criteria will technological quality and relevance of the project, and the relevance, fellowship for the parties involved. include the scientific excellence of the candidate, the scientific and impact and benefit of the S t a y s a t M a r i e C u r i e t r a i n i n g s i t e s The training sites will be selected by the Commission. The young researchers will subsequently be selected by the training site. The Commission will establish detailed criteria, concerning notably qualification and equal access opportunities to be followed by the training site in the selection of fellows. Before a fellowship contract is offered, the selected fellows will have to be confirmed by the Commission. The selection criteria will include the research quality of the training site, the ability of the training site to provide research training, the evidence of past successful international doctoral training, and the appropriate size of the training site in order to allow adequate working conditions for the young researchers. The young researchers will be selected by the training site on the basis of their scientific ability and on the suitability of the training site for their particular doctoral studies. Enhancing access to research infrastructures Transnational access to major research infrastructures The criteria for selecting infrastructure to be supported will be the quality of the infrastructure, the quality of the research that external users are able to conduct there, the quality of the scientific, interest being technical and logistic support provided for demonstrated by new transnational users coming from countries where no similar infrastructure exists, and the cost-effectiveness of Community support. these external users, the scale of Infrastructure cooperation networks Infrastructure cooperation networks will be selected on the basis of their potential to enhance the access to and the service provided by research infrastructures that have a Community-wide interest and on the basis of the ability of the participants to provide an effective coordination of the network’s activities. Research infrastructure RTD projects RTD projects will be selected on the basis of the scientific originality of the project, the quality of its research method and work plan, the potential of the project to improve infrastructure provision in Europe, and the degree of interest shown generally by infrastructure operators in the field and by the user community. Promoting scientific and technological excellence High-level scientific conferences The criteria for the selection of scientific meetings to be supported will be the interest of the proposed topic for a wider scientific community, the quality of the proposed conference programme and its relevance for the training of the younger generation of European researchers. Distinctions for high-level research work Distinctions will be awarded on the basis of the scientific quality and the relevance of presented projects. Age and scientific background of participants will be duly taken into consideration. L 64/126 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 12. 3. 1999 Raising public awareness To qualify for Community support, projects need to address an issue of broader European interest and involve high quality interaction between scientists and science communicators for the benefit of European citizens. Preference will be given to projects and initiatives involving at least three mutually independent partners from at least three different Member States or Associated States. Other projects may qualify for support if they promise to produce transferable results that could be used by actors not involved in the respective project


title: 1999/70/EY: Neuvoston päätös, tehty 25 päivänä tammikuuta 1999, Euroopan keskuspankkien ulkopuolisten tilintarkastajien hyväksymisestä

eurovoc_concepts:
EU Member State
accountant
appointment of staff
central bank
self-employed person

text: 29. 1. 1999 FI Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)jen virallinen lehti L 22/69 II (S(cid:132)(cid:132)d(cid:148)kset, joita ei tarvitse julkaista) NEUVOSTO NEUVOSTON P(cid:142)(cid:142)T(cid:153)S, tehty 25 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) tammikuuta 1999, Euroopan keskuspankkien ulkopuolisten tilintarkastajien hyv(cid:132)ksymisest(cid:132) (1999/70/EY) EUROOPAN UNIONIN NEUVOSTO, joka ottaa huomioon p(cid:148)yt(cid:132)kirjan Euroopan keskuspankkij(cid:132)rjes- telm(cid:132)n ja Euroopan keskuspankin peruss(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)st(cid:132) ja erityisesti sen 27 artiklan 1 kohdan, ottaa huomioon Euroopan keskuspankin (j(cid:132)ljemp(cid:132)n(cid:132) ”EKP”) 12 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) marraskuuta 1998 antaman suosi- tuksen (1), sek(cid:132) katsoo, ett(cid:132) EKP:n neuvoston suosittelemien ja neuvoston hyv(cid:132)ksy- mien riippumattomien ja ulkopuolisten tilintarkastajien on tarkastettava EKP:n ja kansallisten keskuspankkien ja (j(cid:132)ljemp(cid:132)n(cid:132) ”KKP”:t) tilit, EKP on suositellut kunkin osallistuvan KKP:n nime(cid:132)- mien nykyisten ulkopuolisten tilintarkastajien uudelleen- nime(cid:132)mist(cid:132), jollei mahdollisesta my(cid:148)hemm(cid:132)st(cid:132) p(cid:132)(cid:132)t(cid:148)k- sest(cid:132) muuta johdu, ON P(cid:142)(cid:142)TT(cid:142)NYT SEURAAVAA: 1 artikla 1. KPMG R(cid:130)viseurs d’Entreprises s. c. , Antwerpen ja Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu s. c. , Bryssel hyv(cid:132)ksyt(cid:132)(cid:132)n Banque Nationale de Belgique / Nationale Bank van Belgi(cid:137)n ulkopuolisiksi tilintarkastajiksi. 2. KPMG Deutsche Treuhandgesellschaft AG ja PwC Deutsche Revision AG hyv(cid:132)ksyt(cid:132)(cid:132)n Deutsche Bundes- bankin ulkopuolisiksi tilintarkastajiksi. (1) EYVL C 411, 31. 12. 1998, s. 11 Coopers & Lybrand, 3. joka kuuluu Pricewaterhouse- Coopersin kansainv(cid:132)liseen yritykseen hyv(cid:132)ksyt(cid:132)(cid:132)n Banco de Espa(cid:157)an ulkopuoliseksi tilintarkastajaksi. 4. Mazars & Gu(cid:130)rard, ja Deloitte Touche Pariisi Tohmatsu-Audit, Neuilly hyv(cid:132)ksyt(cid:132)(cid:132)n Banque de Francen ulkopuolisiksi tilintarkastajiksi. PricewaterhouseCoopers, 5. hyv(cid:132)ksyt(cid:132)(cid:132)n Central Bank of Irelandin ulkopuoliseksi tilintarkastajaksi. Dublin Reconta Ernst & Young s. p. a. , Rome hyv(cid:132)ksyt(cid:132)(cid:132)n 6. Banca d’Italian ulkopuoliseksi tilintarkastajaksi. PricewaterhouseCoopers S. A. R. L. (Soci(cid:130)t(cid:130) (cid:133) respon- 7. sabilit(cid:130) limit(cid:130)e), R(cid:130)viseur d’Entreprises, Luxemburg hyv(cid:132)ksyt(cid:132)(cid:132)n Banque centrale du Luxembourgin ulkopuo- liseksi tilintarkastajaksi. 8. Prof. Drs. J. A. van Manen RA (rekister(cid:148)ity tilintar- kastaja), joka t(cid:132)ss(cid:132) teht(cid:132)v(cid:132)ss(cid:132)(cid:132)n toimii itsen(cid:132)isesti ja joka on PricewaterhouseCoopersin osakas, hyv(cid:132)ksyt(cid:132)(cid:132)n De tilintarkastajaksi. Nederlandsche Bankin ulkopuoliseksi Prof. DDr. Kurt Neuner, Dr. Pipin Henzl, Dr. Peter 9. Wolf, Mag. Christian Hofer, Dkfm. Dr. Peter Christian Cormasz ja Dkfm. Leopold Wundsam, jotka kaikki ovat rekister(cid:148)ityj(cid:132) hyv(cid:132)ksyttyj(cid:132) julkisia tilintarkastajia, hyv(cid:132)ksy- t(cid:132)(cid:132)n (cid:153)sterreichische Nationalbankin ulkopuolisiksi tilin- tarkastajiksi. 10. PricewaterhouseCoopers-Auditores e Consultores Lda. hyv(cid:132)ksyt(cid:132)(cid:132)n Banco de Portugalin ulkopuoliseksi tilintarkastajaksi. Arthur Andersen Oy hyv(cid:132)ksyt(cid:132)(cid:132)n Suomen Pankin 11. ulkopuoliseksi tilintarkastajaksi. L 22/70 FI Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)jen virallinen lehti 29. 1. 1999 T(cid:132)m(cid:132) p(cid:132)(cid:132)t(cid:148)s ilmoitetaan EKP:lle. 2 artikla 3 artikla T(cid:132)m(cid:132) p(cid:132)(cid:132)t(cid:148)s julkaistaan Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)jen virallisessa lehdess(cid:132). Tehty Brysseliss(cid:132) 25 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) tammikuuta 1999. Neuvoston puolesta J. FISCHER Puheenjohtaja


title: Komission asetus (EY) N:o 169/1999, annettu 25 päivänä tammikuuta 1999, tiettyjen tavaroiden luokittelusta yhdistettyyn nimikkeistöön

eurovoc_concepts:
Combined Nomenclature
cereal flour
chemical compound
classification
customs regulations

text: L 19/6 FI Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)jen virallinen lehti 26. 1. 1999 KOMISSION ASETUS (EY) N:o 169/1999, annettu 25 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) tammikuuta 1999, tiettyjen tavaroiden luokittelusta yhdistettyyn nimikkeist(cid:148)(cid:148)n EUROOPAN YHTEIS(cid:153)JEN KOMISSIO, joka ottaa huomioon Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)n perustamissopi- muksen, ottaa huomioon tariffi- ja tilastonimikkeist(cid:148)st(cid:132) ja yhteis- est(cid:132) tullitariffista 23 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) hein(cid:132)kuuta 1987 annetun neuvoston asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2658/87 (1), sellaisena kuin se on viimeksi muutettuna komission asetuksella (EY) N:o 2248/98 (2), ja erityisesti sen 9 artiklan, sek(cid:132) katsoo, ett(cid:132) mainitun asetuksen liitteen(cid:132) olevan yhdistetyn nimik- keist(cid:148)n yhdenmukaisen soveltamisen varmistamiseksi on tarpeen antaa t(cid:132)m(cid:132)n asetuksen liitteess(cid:132) esitettyjen tava- roiden luokittelua koskevia s(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)ksi(cid:132), asetuksessa (ETY) N:o 2658/87 vahvistetaan yhdistetyn nimikkeist(cid:148)n yleiset tulkintas(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)t; n(cid:132)it(cid:132) s(cid:132)(cid:132)nt(cid:148)j(cid:132) sovel- letaan my(cid:148)s kaikkiin muihin nimikkeist(cid:148)ihin, jotka perustuvat kokonaan tai osittain yhdistettyyn nimikkeis- t(cid:148)(cid:148)n taikka joissa siihen mahdollisesti lis(cid:132)t(cid:132)(cid:132)n alajakoja ja jotka vahvistetaan yhteis(cid:148)n erityiss(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)ksill(cid:132) tavaroiden kauppaa koskevien tariffim(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)ysten tai muiden toimen- piteiden soveltamiseksi, mainittujen yleisten tulkintas(cid:132)(cid:132)nt(cid:148)jen mukaan on t(cid:132)m(cid:132)n asetuksen liitteen taulukossa olevassa 1 sarakkeessa esitetyt tavarat luokiteltava 2 sarakkeen CN-koodeihin 3 sarakkeesta ilmenevin perustein, sella vahvistettujen s(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)sten mukaisia, voidaan edelleen vedota yhteis(cid:148)n tullikoodeksista 12 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) lokakuuta 1992 annetun neuvoston asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2913/92 (3), sellaisena kuin se on viimeksi muutettuna Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetuksella (EY) N:o 82/97 (4), 12 artiklan 6 kohdan mukaisesti kolmen kuukauden ajan, ja t(cid:132)ss(cid:132) asetuksessa s(cid:132)(cid:132)detyt toimenpiteet ovat tullikoodek- sikomitean tariffi- ja tilastonimikkeist(cid:148)jaoston lausunnon mukaiset, ON ANTANUT T(cid:142)M(cid:142)N ASETUKSEN: 1 artikla Liitteen taulukossa olevassa 1 sarakkeessa esitetyt tavarat luokitellaan yhdistetyss(cid:132) nimikkeist(cid:148)ss(cid:132) taulukossa olevan 2 sarakkeen CN-koodeihin. 2 artikla J(cid:132)senvaltioiden tulliviranomaisten antamiin sitoviin tarif- fitietoihin, jotka eiv(cid:132)t ole t(cid:132)ll(cid:132) asetuksella vahvistettujen s(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)sten mukaisia, voidaan vedota asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2913/92 12 artiklan 6 kohdan mukaisesti viel(cid:132) kolmen kuukauden ajan. 3 artikla on asianmukaista, ett(cid:132) j(cid:132)senvaltioiden tulliviranomaisten tavaroiden luokittelusta yhdistettyyn nimikkeist(cid:148)(cid:148)n anta- miin sitoviin tariffitietoihin, jotka eiv(cid:132)t ole t(cid:132)ll(cid:132) asetuk- T(cid:132)m(cid:132) asetus tulee voimaan kahdentenakymmenenten(cid:132)en- simm(cid:132)isen(cid:132) p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) sen j(cid:132)lkeen, kun se on julkaistu Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)jen virallisessa lehdess(cid:132). T(cid:132)m(cid:132) asetus on kaikilta osiltaan velvoittava, j(cid:132)senvaltioissa. ja sit(cid:132) sovelletaan sellaisenaan kaikissa Tehty Brysseliss(cid:132) 25 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) tammikuuta 1999. Komission puolesta Mario MONTI Komission j(cid:132)sen (1) EYVL L 256, 7. 9. 1987, s. 1 (2) EYVL L 282, 20. 10. 1998, s. 55 (3) EYVL L 302, 19. 10. 1992, s. 1 (4) EYVL L 17, 21. 1. 1997, s. 1 26. 1. 1999 FI Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)jen virallinen lehti L 19/7 Tavaran kuvaus (1) LIITE Luokittelu (CN-koodi) (2) Perusteet (3) 1. Ruisleiv(cid:132)n valmistamiseen tarkoitettu jauhosekoitus, jossa 1101 00 90 on (painoprosentteina): — ruisjauhoja: 50 — vehn(cid:132)jauhoja: 48,6 — vehn(cid:132)gluteenia: 1,4 2. Moniviljaleiv(cid:132)n valmistamiseen tarkoitettu jauhosekoitus, 1101 00 15 jossa on (painoprosentteina): — tavallisesta vehn(cid:132)st(cid:132) valmistettuja jauhoja: 78,5 — ruisjauhoja: 7 — kaurajauhoja: 4 — riisijauhoja: 4 — ohrajauhoja: 2 — jauhettuja viljanalkioita: 1 — vehn(cid:132)gluteenia: 3,5 Luokittelu m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)ytyy yhdistetyn nimikkeist(cid:148)n 1 ja 6 yleisen tulkintas(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)n sek(cid:132) CN-koodien 1101 00 ja 1101 00 90 nimiketekstien mukaan. Luokittelu m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)ytyy yhdistetyn nimikkeist(cid:148)n 1, 3 b ja 6 yleisen tulkintas(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)n sek(cid:132) CN-koodien 1101 00 ja 1101 00 15 mukaan. 3. Leip(cid:132)jauho, jossa on (painoprosentteina): 1101 00 15 — tavallisesta vehn(cid:132)st(cid:132) valmistettuja jauhoja: 99,85 Luokittelu m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)ytyy yhdistetyn nimikkeist(cid:148)n 1 ja 6 yleisen tulkintas(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)n sek(cid:132) CN-koodien 1101 00 ja 1101 00 15 nimiketekstien mukaan. — suolaa: 0,15 ja hyvin pieni(cid:132) m(cid:132)(cid:132)ri(cid:132) amylaasia ja antioksidanttia (E 300) 4. Leiv(cid:132)n tekoon tarkoitettu jauhopohjainen valmiste, jossa 1901 20 00 on (painoprosentteina): — tavallisesta vehn(cid:132)st(cid:132) valmistettuja jauhoja: 88 — ruisjauhoja: 10 — kuivattua ruishapatetta: 1 — leivontahiivaa, emulgointiainetta: 1 ja hyvin pieni(cid:132) m(cid:132)(cid:132)ri(cid:132) amylaasia ja antioksidanttia (E 300) Luokittelu m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)ytyy yhdistetyn nimikkeist(cid:148)n 1 ja 6 yleisen tulkintas(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)n sek(cid:132) CN-koodien 1901 ja 1901 20 00 nimi- ketekstien mukaan. Lis(cid:132)tty leivontahiiva ja ruishapate antavat tuotteelle nimik- keen 1905 leipomatuotteiden valmistamiseen k(cid:132)ytett(cid:132)v(cid:132)n sekoituksen luonteen eik(cid:132) se 11. ryhm(cid:132)n ryhm(cid:132)huomau- tuksen 1 b nojalla voi kuulua 11. ryhm(cid:132)(cid:132)n. (C-vitamiinin suolaa), 5. Tabletit, joiden paino on 550 mg ja jotka sis(cid:132)lt(cid:132)v(cid:132)t 200 g 342 mg kalsiumaskorbaattia t(cid:132)yteainetta, joka koostuu dikalsiumfosfaatista, mikroki- teisest(cid:132) selluloosasta, ristisilloitetusta natriumkarboksime- tyyliselluloosasta ja steariinihaposta, sek(cid:132) 8 mg magne- siumstearaattia paakkuuntumisenestoaineena ja antioksi- danttia (E 300) 2106 90 92 Luokittelu m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)ytyy yhdistetyn nimikkeist(cid:148)n 1 ja 6 yleisen tulkintas(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)n sek(cid:132) CN-koodien 2106, ja 2106 90 92 nimiketekstien mukaan. 2106 90 Tuote ei kuulu nimikkeeseen 2936, koska siihen sis(cid:132)ltyy lis(cid:132)aineita, joita ei mainita 29. ryhm(cid:132)n ryhm(cid:132)huomautuk- sissa 1 f ja 1 g eik(cid:132) harmonoidun j(cid:132)rjestelm(cid:132)n selityksiss(cid:132), nimikkeen 2936 kohdassa d. 6. a) Hopeaan perustuva pasta (korkea hopeapitoisuus) 3207 30 00 — Hopeaa: 72 % — Kadmiumyhdistett(cid:132): 8,9 % — Lyijy-yhdistett(cid:132): 8,9 % 6. b) Hopeaan perustuva pasta (keskikorkea hopeapitoisuus) — Hopeaa: 45 % — Kadmiumyhdistett(cid:132): 3,5 % — Lyijy-yhdistett(cid:132): 3,5 % Tuotteet ovat pastan muodossa ja niit(cid:132) k(cid:132)ytet(cid:132)(cid:132)n painettaessa s(cid:132)hk(cid:148)piirej(cid:132) emaloiduille ter(cid:132)slevyille. Luokittelu m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)ytyy yhdistetyn nimikkeist(cid:148)n 1 ja 6 yleisen tulkintas(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)n, 71 ryhm(cid:132)n 3 huomautuksen c kohdan ja CN-koodien 3207 ja 3207 30 00 nimiketekstien mukaisesti. Ks. my(cid:148)s harmonoidun j(cid:132)rjestelm(cid:132)n selitykset, nimike 7106. L 19/8 FI Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)jen virallinen lehti 26. 1. 1999 Tavaran kuvaus (1) Luokittelu (CN-koodi) (2) Perusteet (3) 7. Jauheena oleva v(cid:132)riaine, jolla on magneettisia ominai- suuksia ja jota k(cid:132)ytet(cid:132)(cid:132)n kehitteen(cid:132) valokopiointilaitteessa. 3707 90 30 Tuotteen koostumus: — Styreeni- ja butyyliakrylaattikopolymeeria: 40 % — Polypropeenia: 3 % — Magnetiittia: 56 % — Piidioksidia: : 1 % Luokittelu m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)ytyy yhdistetyn nimikkeist(cid:148)n 1 ja 6 yleisen tulkintas(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)n sek(cid:132) CN-koodien 3707, ja 3707 90 30 nimiketekstien mukaan. 3707 90 Katso my(cid:148)s harmonoidun j(cid:132)rjestelm(cid:132)n selitykset, nimike 3215, a kohta (nimikkeeseen kuulumattomat) ja nimike 3707, kohta 2 (kehitteet). 8. Montmorilloniitista muodostuvat kermanvalkoiset orga- joihin on lis(cid:132)tty noin 30 % stearyla- nofiiliset jauheet, miinia. 3824 90 95 Luokittelu m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)ytyy yhdistetyn nimikkeist(cid:148)n 1 ja 6 yleisen tulkintas(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)n sek(cid:132) nimikkeiden 3824, ja 3824 90 95 nimiketekstien mukaan. 3824 90 N(cid:132)m(cid:132) organofiiliset tuotteet sekoittuvat helposti orgaani- siin liuottimiin ja menett(cid:132)v(cid:132)t 35 % massastaan 600 (cid:190)C:n l(cid:132)mp(cid:148)tilassa. Tuotetta ei voida pit(cid:132)(cid:132) aktivoituna siten kuin nimikkeess(cid:132) 3802 tarkoitetaan. Katso my(cid:148)s harmonoidun j(cid:132)rjestelm(cid:132)n selitykset, nimike 3824 (40)