title: Amended proposal for a European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) allowing voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS)

eurovoc_concepts:
EU environmental policy
environmental law
environmental monitoring
management information system
type of business

text: 25. 7. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 212 E/1 II (Preparatory Acts) COMMISSION Amended proposal for a European Parliament and Council Regulation allowing voluntary partici- pation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) (1) (2000/C 212 E/01) (Text with EEA relevance) COM(1999) 313 final (cid:151) 98/0303(COD) (Submitted by the Commission pursuant to Article 250 paragraph 2 of the EC Treaty on 23 June 1999) (1) OJ C 400, 22. 12. 1998, p. 7. INITIAL PROPOSAL AMENDED PROPOSAL THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Unchanged Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 130 S (1) thereof, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 175 thereof, Having regard to the Proposal from the Commission, Unchanged Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament, Having regard to the Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee, Having regard to the Opinion of the Committee of Regions, Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 189c of the Treaty in cooperation with the European Parliament, (1) Whereas Article 2 of the Treaty stipulates that the Community shall have among its to promote throughout the Community sustainable growth and the the Council importance of such sustainable growth; resolution of February 1993 (1) stresses tasks Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty, Unchanged (2) Whereas the ’Towards programme Sustainability’, presented by the Commission and approved as to its general I February 1993, underlines the role and responsibilities of companies, both to reinforce the economy and to protect the environment throughout the Community; resolution of approach by the Council (3) Whereas the programme ’Towards Sustainability’ calls for broadening the range of instruments in the field of environmental protection and for using market-mech- anisms to commit organisations to adopt a pro-active field beyond compliance with all approach in this relevant the environment; requirements regulatory regarding ___________ (1) OJ C 138 of 17. 5. 1993, p. 1. C 212 E/2 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 25. 7. 2000 INITIAL PROPOSAL AMENDED PROPOSAL (4) Whereas Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1836/93 allowing voluntary participation by companies in the industrial in a Community eco-management and audit sector scheme in promoting environmental performance of industry; demonstrated of improvements effectiveness its the (EMAS) (5) Whereas EMAS should therefore be made available for all organisations having significant environmental impacts, providing a means for them to manage these significant impacts and to improve their overall environmental performance; (5) Whereas EMAS should therefore be made available for all organisations having environmental impacts, providing a means for them to manage these significant impacts and to improve their overall environmental performance; (6) Whereas the experience gathered from the implemen- tation of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1836/93 shall be used to enhance the ability of EMAS to bring about improvement of the overall environmental performance of organisations; Unchanged (7) Whereas, in conformity with the principle of subsidiarity and the principle of proportionality referred to in Article 5 of the Treaty, the effectiveness of EMAS in contributing to better environmental performance of European organi- sations is to be achieved at Community level; whereas this implemen- Regulation limits itself to ensuring an equal tation by providing for common rules, procedures and essential requirements regarding EMAS whilst the measures that can be adequately performed at national level are left to the Member States; the Community throughout EMAS of Unchanged the the Treaty, effectiveness of EMAS (7) Whereas, in conformity with the principle of subsidiarity and the principle of proportionality referred to in Article 3b of in contributing to better environmental performance of European organisations is to be achieved at Community level; whereas this Regulation limits itself to ensuring an equal the Community by providing for common rules, procedures the and essential requirements regarding EMAS whilst measures that can be adequately performed at national level are left to the Member States; implementation throughout EMAS of (8) Whereas organisations to participate in EMAS on a voluntary basis and should gain added value in terms of regulatory control, cost savings and public image; encouraged should be (9) Whereas it is important that small and medium-sized enterprises participate in EMAS and that their partici- pation or promoted promoting technical assistance measures and structures aimed at providing such organisations with relevant expertise and appropriate support; establishing should by be (10) Whereas the information provided by Member States shall be used by the Commission to assess the need for developing specific measures aimed at greater partici- pation in EMAS by organisations, in particular small and medium-sized enterprises; (11) Whereas the transparency and credibility of organisations systems are implementing environmental management audit enhanced when programme and environmental statement are examined to verify that the relevant requirements of this Regulation and when the environmental statement and its subsequent updates are validated by accredited environmental verifiers; their management they meet system, 25. 7. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 212 E/3 INITIAL PROPOSAL AMENDED PROPOSAL (12) Whereas it is the therefore necessary competence of the environmental verifiers by providing for an independent and neutral accreditation system and an appropriate supervision of their activities in order to ensure the overall credibility of EMAS; to ensure (12) Whereas it is therefore necessary to ensure and steadily improve the competence of the environmental verifiers by providing for an independent and neutral accreditation system, retraining and an appropriate supervision of their activities in order to ensure the overall credibility of EMAS; whereas close cooperation with the national accreditation bodies must accordingly be set up; (13) Whereas organisations should be encouraged to produce and make publicly available periodic environmental statements providing the public and other stakeholders with information on their environmental performance; Unchanged (14) Whereas according the Commission should, to a Community procedure, adapt the Annexes to this Regu- lation, recognise European and international standards for environmental issues of relevance to EMAS and establish guidelines in partnerships with EMAS stakeholders for ensuring a consistent the EMAS requirements across the Member States; implementation of (15) Whereas the Member States should create incentives to encourage organisations to participate in EMAS; (16) Whereas the Commission should support the candidate countries for European Union membership in their setting up of the structures necessary for the implemen- tation of EMAS; (17) Whereas the European institutions shall endeavour to adopt the principles enshrined in this Regulation; (18) Whereas this Regulation should be revised in the light of experience gained after a certain period of operation, Unchanged HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 The eco-management and audit scheme and its objectives A Community scheme allowing voluntary participation 1. by organisations hereinafter referred to as EMAS, is hereby established for the evaluation and improvement of the environ- mental performance of organisations and the provision of the relevant information to the public and other stakeholders. A Community scheme allowing voluntary participation 1. by organisations hereinafter referred to as EMAS, is hereby established for the evaluation and improvement of the environ- mental performance of organisations and the provision of the relevant information to the public and other interested parties. The objective of EMAS shall be to promote continual 2. improvements in the environmental performance of organi- sations by: Unchanged (a) the establishment and implementation of environmental management systems by organisations; (b) the systematic, objective and periodic evaluation of the performance of such systems; C 212 E/4 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 25. 7. 2000 INITIAL PROPOSAL AMENDED PROPOSAL (c) the provision of information of environmental performance (c) the provision of information of environmental performance to the public and other stakeholders. to the public and other interested parties; (d) the involvement of employees. Unchanged EMAS shall be without prejudice to Community law or 3. national laws or technical standards regarding environmental controls not governed by Community law and without prejudice to the duties of organisations under those laws and standards. Article 2 Definitions For the purposes of this Regulation: (a) (cid:145)environmental policy(cid:146) shall mean the organisations’ overall to the aims and principles of action with respect environment including compliance with all relevant regu- latory requirements regarding the environment; (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (cid:145)environmental review(cid:146) shall mean an initial comprehensive analysis and impact environmental performance related to activities of an organisation; issues, the of (cid:145)environmental aspect(cid:146) shall mean an element of an organi- sation’s activities, products or services that can interact with the environment. NOTE A significant environmental aspect is an environ- mental aspect that has or can have a significant environ- mental impact. (cid:145)environmental impact(cid:146) shall mean any change to the environment, whether adverse or beneficial, wholly or partially activities, products or services; from an organisation’s resulting specific objectives and activities (cid:145)environmental programme(cid:146) shall mean a description of the organisation’s to ensure greater protection of the environment of an organi- sation including a description of the measures taken or envisaged to achieve such objectives and where appro- such for priate the deadlines measures; implementation of set (cid:145)environmental objective(cid:146) shall mean an overall environ- mental goal, arising from the environmental policy, that an organisation sets to achieve, and which is itself quantified where practicable; (cid:145)environmental target(cid:146) shall mean a detailed performance requirement, quantified where practicable, applicable to the organisation or parts thereof, that arises from the environmental objectives and that needs to be set and met in order to achieve those objectives; 25. 7. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 212 E/5 INITIAL PROPOSAL AMENDED PROPOSAL (h) (i) (cid:145)environmental management system(cid:146) shall mean that part the overall management system which includes the of organisational practices, procedures, processes and resources for determining and implementing the environmental policy; responsibilities, structure, shall mean a management systematic, documented, periodic the performance of tool (cid:145)environmental audit(cid:146) and comprising a objective evaluation of the organi- sation, management system and processes designed to protect the environment with the aim of: (i) facilitating management control of practices which may have impact on the environment; (ii) assessing compliance with the environmental policies of the organisation; (j) (cid:145)audit cycle(cid:146) shall mean the period of time in which all the activities in an organisation are audited; (k) (cid:145)environmental detailed in Annex III 3. 2 a-g; statement(cid:146) shall mean the information (l) (cid:145)interested party(cid:146) shall mean an individual or a group, including authorities, concerned with or affected by the environmental performance of an organisation. (l) firm, (cid:145)organisation(cid:146) shall mean a company, corporation, enterprise, authority or institution, or part or combination thereof, whether incorporated or not, public or private, that has its own functions and administrations. (m) (cid:145)organisation(cid:146) shall mean a company, corporation, firm, enterprise, authority or institution, or part or combination thereof, whether incorporated or not, public or private, that has its own functions and administrations. The entity to be registered shall be agreed with the verifier taking account of Commission guidance, established in accordance with the procedures laid down in Article 14, but shall not exceed the boundaries of one Member State. Where the organisation constitutes a site this shall be the basis for registration. Unchanged (m) (cid:145)site(cid:146) shall mean all land at a distinct geographic location under the management control of an organisation covering activities, products and services. This includes all infra- structure, equipment and materials; (n) (cid:145)auditor(cid:146) shall mean an individual or a team, belonging to the organisation personnel or external to the organisation, acting on behalf of the organisation’s top management, possessing, individually or collectively, the competencies referred to in Annex II paragraph 2. 4 and being sufficiently independent of to make an objective judgement; the activities they audit (n) (o) (cid:145)site(cid:146) shall mean all land at a distinct geographic location under the management control of an organisation covering activities, products and services. This includes all infra- structure, equipment and materials; (cid:145)auditor(cid:146) shall mean an individual or a team, belonging to the organisation personnel or external to the organisation, acting on behalf of the organisation’s top management, possessing, individually or collectively, the competencies referred to in Annex II paragraph 2. 4 and being sufficiently independent of to make an objective judgement; the activities they audit C 212 E/6 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 25. 7. 2000 INITIAL PROPOSAL AMENDED PROPOSAL (o) (p) (cid:145)accredited environmental verifier(cid:146) shall mean any person or organisation independent of the organisation being verified, who has obtained accreditation, in line with the conditions and procedures referred to in Article 4; (cid:145)accreditation system(cid:146) shall mean a system for the accredi- tation and supervision of environmental verifiers operated by an impartial institution or organisation designated or created by the Member State, with sufficient resources and competency for performing the functions defined by this Regulation for such a system; and having appropriate procedures (p) (q) (cid:145)accredited environmental verifier(cid:146) shall mean any person or organisation independent of the organisation being verified, who has obtained accreditation, in line with the conditions and procedures referred to in Article 4; (cid:145)accreditation system(cid:146) shall mean a system for the accredi- tation and supervision of environmental verifiers operated by an impartial institution or organisation designated or created by the Member State, with sufficient resources and competency for performing the functions defined by this Regulation for such a system; and having appropriate procedures (q) (cid:145)competent bodies(cid:146) shall mean the bodies designated by Member States in line with Article 5, to perform the tasks mentioned in this Regulation. (r) (cid:145)competent bodies(cid:146) shall mean the bodies designated by Member States, whether national, regional or local, in line with Article 5, to perform the tasks mentioned in this Regulation. Article 3 Unchanged Participation in EMAS EMAS is open to any organisation dedicated to improving its overall environmental performance. 1. Registration to EMAS In order for an organisation to be registered to EMAS it must: (a) conduct an environmental its activities, products and services in accordance with Annex VII of this Regulation addressing the issues contained in Annex VI and, in the light of the results of that review: review of (b) implement compliance, environmental an environmental management system covering all the elements described in Annex I-A of this Regulation. An organisation must also provide for legal performance improvement and external communication as explained in Annex I-B. environmental Organisations management recognised according to the requirements of Article 9, do not need to conduct a formal initial environmental review when moving on to EMAS implementation, if the necessary information the environ- for the identification and evaluation of mental aspects of Annex VI is provided by the certified environmental management system. certified system, having a (c) carry out, or cause to be carried out, environmental requirements of auditing in accordance with the Annex II of this Regulation. The audits must be designed to assess the environmental performance of the organisation; (d) prepare, in accordance with Annex III 3. 2 an environ- mental statement. The statement should pay particular attention to the performance of an organisation against its environmental objectives and targets; 25. 7. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 212 E/7 INITIAL PROPOSAL AMENDED PROPOSAL (e) have the initial environmental review, if appropriate, management system, audit procedure and environmental statement or extracts of it produced for defined stake- holders, if required by the organisation, examined to verify that they meet the relevant requirements of this Regulation and the environmental statements validated to ensure it meets the requirements of Annex III 3. 2; (e) have the initial environmental review, extracts of if if appropriate, management system, audit procedure and environmental it produced for defined statement or required by the organisation, interested parties, examined to verify that relevant requirements of this Regulation and the environmental statements validated to ensure it meets the requirements of Annex III 3. 2; they meet the (f) forward the validated environmental statement to the competent body of the Member State where the organi- sation is located and after registration, make it publicly available. Unchanged 2. Maintenance of EMAS registration In order for an organisation to maintain registration to EMAS it must: (a) have the environmental management system and audit the in accordance verified with programme requirements of Annex V 5. 6; (b) forward the yearly validated updates of its environ- to the competent body and make mental statement them publicly available. Accreditation and supervision of environmental verifiers Article 4 use either independent environmental verifiers and for 1. Member States shall establish a system for the accredi- tation of the their activities. To this end, Member States supervision of may the competent bodies referred to in Article 5 or designate or set up any other body with an appropriate status. Member States shall ensure that systems to guarantee their such as neutrality in the execution of their tasks. these independence and the composition of accreditation institutions, existing is 2. Member States shall ensure that these systems are fully operational within 3 months following the date of entry into force of this Regulation. 3. Member States shall ensure appropriate consultation of parties involved, in setting up and directing the accreditation systems. The accreditation of environmental verifiers and super- their activities shall be in accordance with the 4. vision of requirements of Annex V. the 5. Member States shall measures taken pursuant to this Article and communicate relevant changes in the structure and procedures of the accredi- tation systems. inform the Commission of C 212 E/8 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 25. 7. 2000 INITIAL PROPOSAL AMENDED PROPOSAL The Commission shall, in accordance with the procedure 6. laid down in Article l4, promote collaboration between Member States in order in particular to: (cid:151) avoid inconsistency between criteria, and procedures they apply for the accreditation of environ- mental verifiers; conditions (cid:151) avoid inconsistency between the provisions of this Regu- lation and criteria, conditions and procedures they apply for the accreditation of environmental verifiers; (cid:151) avoid inconsistency between the procedures and measures they apply for the supervision of environmental verifiers they have accredited; (cid:151) avoid inconsistency between the provisions of this Regu- lation and the procedures and measures they apply for the supervision of environmental verifiers they have accredited; (cid:151) avoid inconsistency between the procedures and measures they apply for the supervision of environmental verifiers accredited in other Member States. (cid:151) avoid inconsistency between the provisions of this Regu- lation and the procedures and measures they apply for the supervision of environmental verifiers accredited in other Member States. 7. Environmental verifiers accredited in one Member State may perform verification activities in any other Member State, according to the requirements laid down in Annex V. Unchanged competence twice per year attended by a representative of 8. A forum, constituted of all accreditation bodies, shall be set up by the accreditation bodies with the aim of providing the Commission with the elements and means to fulfil its It shall meet, as necessary, at obligation under Article 4. 6. least the Commission. The forum shall develop guidance on issues in the field of accreditation, verifiers and through developing a common understanding of Annex V requirements. These guidance documents shall be submitted to the procedures laid down in Article 14 of this Regulation. In order to ensure a harmonised development of the func- tioning of accreditation bodies and the verification process in all the Member States, the forum shall develop procedures for a peer review process. The aim of the peer review shall be to ensure that the accreditation systems of Member States meet the requirements of the peer review activities will be transmitted to the Commission. this Regulation. A report of supervision of Article 5 Competent bodies 1. Within 3 months of the entry into force of this Regu- lation, each Member State shall designate the competent body responsible for carrying out the tasks provided for in this Regulation, particularly in Articles 6 and 7 and shall inform the Commission thereof. 25. 7. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 212 E/9 INITIAL PROPOSAL AMENDED PROPOSAL 2. Member States shall ensure that the composition of the competent bodies is such as to guarantee their independence and neutrality, and that the competent bodies apply the provisions of this Regulation in a consistent manner. 3. Member States shall develop guidelines for suspension and deletion of the registration of organisations, for the use of competent bodies. Competent bodies shall, in particular, have procedures for (cid:151) considering observations from interested parties concerning registered organisations and (cid:151) refusal of registration, deletion or suspension of organi- sations from registration. The competent body shall be responsible for the regis- 4. tration of organisations to EMAS. It shall therefore control the entry and maintenance of organisations on the register. Refusal of registration, suspension or deletion of organisations from the register the appropriate in order to provide the competent body interested parties, with the necessary elements of evidence for taking its decision. require the consultation of shall the Commission. The objective of 5. Competent bodies from all Member States shall meet, as necessary, at least twice per year attended by a representative of these meetings is to ensure the consistency of procedures relating to the registration of organisations to EMAS. A peer review process shall be put in place by the competent bodies in order for them to develop a common understanding of their practical approach towards registration. A report of the peer review activities will be trans- mitted to the Commission and made publicly available. Article 6 Registration of organisations Registration of organisations 1. competent bodies on the basis of the following cases: shall be dealt with by (a) If a competent body (cid:151) has received a validated environmental statement and (cid:151) has received a completed form (Annex VIII) from the organisation and (cid:151) has received any registration fee that may be payable under Article 16 and (cid:151) is satisfied, on the basis of evidence received, that the organisation meets all the requirements of this Regu- lation, it shall register the applicant organisation and give it a registration number. The competent body shall inform the organisation’s management that the organisation appears on the register. C 212 E/10 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 25. 7. 2000 INITIAL PROPOSAL AMENDED PROPOSAL (b) If a competent body receives a supervision report from the accreditation body which gives evidence that the activities of the verifier were not performed adequately enough to ensure that the requirements of this Regulation are met by the applicant organisation, registration shall be refused until assurance of compliance with EMAS is obtained. (c) If an organisation fails to submit to a competent body, within three months of being required to do so, (cid:151) the yearly validated updates of the environmental statement or (cid:151) a completed form (Annex VIII) from the organisation or (cid:151) any relevant registration fees the organisation shall be suspended or deleted from the register, as appropriate, depending on the nature and scope of the failure. The competent body shall inform the organisation’s management of the reasons for the measures taken. that (d) If, at any time, a competent body concludes, on the basis of the organisation is no longer evidence received, complying with one or more of this Regulation, the organisation shall be suspended or deleted from the register, as appropriate, depending on the nature and scope of the failure. The competent body shall inform the organisation’s management of the measures taken. the conditions of the reasons for (e) If a competent body is informed by the competent enforcement authority of a breach at the organisation of relevant regulatory requirements regarding environmental protection, it shall refuse registration of that organisation or suspend it from the register as appropriate. competent body shall The inform the organisation’s management of the reasons for the measures taken and of competent the process of enforcement authority. discussion with the (f) Refusal or suspension shall be lifted if the competent body has received satisfactory assurances from the competent enforcement authority that the breach has been rectified and that satisfactory arrangements are in place to ensure that it does not recur. The competent body shall update any changes in the list 2. of organisations registered to EMAS on a monthly basis. Article 7 List of registered organisations and accredited environ- mental verifiers The accreditation systems 1. revise and update a list of accredited environmental verifiers in each Member State and shall directly, or via the national authorities as decided by the Member State concerned, communicate changes in this list each month to the Commission. shall establish, 25. 7. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 212 E/11 INITIAL PROPOSAL AMENDED PROPOSAL registered organisations The competent bodies shall establish and maintain a list 2. in each Member States. The of competent bodies shall directly, or via the national authorities as decided by the Member State concerned, communicate changes in this list each month to the Commission. The register of accredited environmental verifiers and 3. EMAS registered organisations shall be maintained by the Commission which shall make it publicly available. Article 8 Logo 1. Organisations participating in EMAS may use the logo detailed in Annex IV. Annex IV shall be completed by the Commission acting in accordance with the procedure of Article 14. The logo can only be used by organisations having a current EMAS registration. The logo may not be used in any other form than that detailed in Annex IV. The EMAS logo may only be used by organisations in the 2. following circumstances (cid:151) On validated environmental statements, (cid:151) On registered organisation letterheads, (cid:151) On information advertising an organisation’s participation in EMAS. The 3. conjunction with environmental activities, products and services logo may also be used by organisations information related in to The in 3. conjunction with as information sheets related to activities, products and services logo may also be used by organisations such environmental information, (cid:151) provided the information is covered in the environmental statement and has been validated by the verifier as: (cid:151) provided the information references and is covered in the environmental statement and has been validated by the verifier as: (a) Accurate and non deceptive Unchanged (b) Substantiated and verifiable (c) Relevant and used in an appropriate context or setting (d) Specific and clear as to the particular aspect the claim relates (e) Unlikely to result in misinterpretation (f) Significant impact in relation to the overall environmental C 212 E/12 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 25. 7. 2000 INITIAL PROPOSAL AMENDED PROPOSAL (cid:151) and provided that the wording (cid:145)validated information(cid:146) is added to the logo as detailed in Annex IV. The logo must not be used in the following cases 4. (cid:151) on products or their packaging, (cid:151) in conjunction with comparative products, activities and services, claims concerning (cid:151) on adverts for products, activities and services. Article 9 Relationship with European and international standards issues relevant Organisations implementing, European or international 1. to EMAS and standards for environmental certified, according to appropriate certification procedures, as complying with those standards shall be considered as meeting the corresponding requirements of this Regulation, provided that: (a) the standards are recognised by the Commission acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 14; (b) the accreditation granted to the certification body is recognised by the Commission acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 14. The references of the recognised standards (including the relevant sections of EMAS to which they apply) and recognised accreditation shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities. 2. To enable such organisations to be registered to EMAS, the organisations concerned must demonstrate to the verifier only compliance with requirements not covered by the recognised standards. Article 10 Promotion of organisations’ participation, in particular of small and medium-sized enterprises 1. Member States shall promote organisations’ participation in EMAS and shall, in particular, consider the need to ensure the participation of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) by (cid:151) facilitating the access to information, to support funds and to public structures, (cid:151) establishing or promoting technical assistance measures, especially in conjunction with initiatives from appropriate professional or local points of contact (e. g. local authorities, chamber of commerce, trade association), (cid:151) establishing or promoting technical assistance measures, especially in conjunction with initiatives from appropriate professional or local points of contact (e. g. local authorities, chamber craft of association), commerce, association trade or 25. 7. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 212 E/13 INITIAL PROPOSAL AMENDED PROPOSAL (cid:151) charging reasonable registration fees in order to encourage higher participation in EMAS, (cid:151) ensuring that the system does not create excessive burden for organisations, particularly SMEs. Unchanged local authorities, In order to promote participation of SMEs concentrated in well defined geographical areas, in participation with industrial associations, chambers of commerce and interested parties may provide assistance in the identification of significant environmental impacts associated with that area. SMEs may then use these in defining their environmental programme and setting the objectives and targets of their EMAS management system. 2. Member States shall consider how registration to EMAS according to this Regulation may be used in the implemen- legislation in order to tation and control of environmental avoid unnecessary duplication of efforts by both organisations and competent enforcement authorities. 3. Member States shall measures taken under this Article. inform the Commission of the 4. The Commission shall promote a coherent approach between the legislative instruments developed at Community level in the field of environmental protection. Article 11 Information Each Member State shall ensure that: 1. (cid:151) organisations are informed of the content of this Regu- lation, (cid:151) the public is informed of components of EMAS. the objectives and principal Member States shall in particular use professional publications, local journal, promotion campaign or any other functional means to deliver a general awareness-level on EMAS. 2. Member States shall measures taken under this Article. 3. EMAS at Community level. The Commission shall be responsible for promoting inform the Commission of the Article 12 Infringements Member States shall take appropriate legal or administrative measures in case of non-compliance with the provisions of this Regulation and communicate these measures to the Commission. C 212 E/14 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 25. 7. 2000 INITIAL PROPOSAL AMENDED PROPOSAL Article 13 Annexes The Annexes to this Regulation shall be adapted by the Commission, acting in accordance with the procedure of Article 14 in the light of experience gained in the operation of EMAS and in response to identified needs for guidance on EMAS requirements. Article 14 Committee The Commission shall be assisted by a committee 1. composed of the representatives of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the 2. committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft within a time limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 205(2) of the Treaty in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the committee shall be weighted in the manner set in that Article. The chairman shall not vote. 3. (a) The Commission shall adopt measures which shall apply immediately. (b) However, if these measures are not in accordance with the be communicated by the Commission to the Council forthwith. In that event: committee, opinion shall they the of (cid:151) The Commission may defer application of the measures which it has decided for a period of not such more than one month from the date of communication; (cid:151) The Council, acting by a qualified majority, may take a different decision within the time limit referred to in the previous paragraph. Article 15 Revision review EMAS in the light of The Commission shall the experience gained during its operation and international devel- opments no later than five years after its entry into force, and shall, the appropriate amendments. if necessary, propose to the Council 25. 7. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 212 E/15 INITIAL PROPOSAL Article 16 Costs and fees AMENDED PROPOSAL A system of fees in accordance with modalities estab- 1. lished by Member States may be set up for the administrative costs incurred in connection with the registration procedures for organisations and the accreditation and supervision of environmental verifiers and the costs of EMAS. 2. Member States shall measures taken under this Article. inform the Commission of the Article 17 the corresponding provisions of Accreditation systems and competent bodies Repeal of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1836/93 Council Regulation (EEC) No 1836/93 shall be repealed at 1. the date of entry into force of this Regulation. set up 2. pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1836/93 shall remain in force. Member States shall modify the procedures followed by accreditation systems and competent bodies this Regulation. under Member States shall ensure that these systems are fully oper- ational within 3 months following the date of entry into force of this Regulation. 3. Environmental verifiers accredited according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1836/93 may continue to perform their activities according to the requirements established by this Regulation. 4. 1836/93 will requirements of shall be checked at the time of the next verification. Sites registered according to Council Regulation (EEC) No remain on the EMAS register. The new this Regulation applicable to organisations Article 18 Entry into force This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. It shall apply 3 months after publication. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. C 212 E/16 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 25. 7. 2000 INITIAL PROPOSAL AMENDED PROPOSAL ANNEX I A. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS Unchanged environmental management The implemented according to Section 4 of the ISO 14001:1996 international standard for environmental management systems. system shall be environmental management The according to Section 4 of standard for environmental management systems. system shall be implemented the EN ISO 14001:1996 international B. ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED BY ORGANISATIONS IMPLEMENTING EMAS Unchanged 1. Legal compliance Organisations must be able to demonstrate that they (cid:151) have identified, and know the implications to the organisation of, all relevant environmental legislation, (cid:151) provide for legal compliance and (cid:151) have procedures in place that will enable the organisation to meet these requirements on an ongoing basis. 2. Performance Organisations must be able to demonstrate that the management system and the audit procedures address the actual environmental to the aspects the organisation with respect performance of identified from Annex VI and that performance evaluation is considered as part of the review process. The organisation must also commit to the continual improvement of its environmental performance. 3. External communication 3. External communication Organisations must be able to demonstrate an open dialogue with interested parties including local communities and customers with regard to the environmental impact of their activities, products and services in order to identify stakeholders’ concerns. Organisations must be able to demonstrate an open dialogue with interested parties including local communities and customers with regard to the environmental impact of their activities, products and services in order to identify interested parties’ concerns. 25. 7. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 212 E/17 REQUIREMENTS CONCERNING INTERNAL ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING ANNEX II 2. 1. General Requirements Internal audits ensure that the activities carried out by an organisation are being conducted in accordance with established procedures. The audit may also identify any problems with those established procedures or any oppor- tunities for improving those procedures. The scope of audits carried out within an organisation may vary from the audit of a simple procedure to the audit of complex activities. Over a period of time all activities in a particular organisation will be subject to an audit. The period of time taken to complete audits of all activities is known as the audit cycle. For small non-complex organisations, it may be possible to audit all activities at one time. For these organisations the audit cycle is the interval between these audits. Internal audits shall be carried out by persons sufficiently independent of the activity being audited to ensure an impartial view. They may be carried out by employees of the organisation or by external parties (employees from other organisations, employees from other parts of the same organisation or consultants). 2. 2. Objectives The organisations environmental auditing programme will define in writing the objectives of each audit or audit cycle including the audit frequency for each activity. The objectives must include, in particular, assessing the management systems in place, and determining conformity with organisation’s policy and programme, which must include compliance with relevant environmental regulatory requirements. 2. 3. Scope The overall scope of the individual audits, or of each stage of an audit cycle where appropriate, must be clearly defined and must explicitly specify the: 1. subject areas covered; 2. activities to be audited; 3. environmental standards to be considered; 4. period covered by the audit. Environmental audit includes assessment of the factual data necessary to evaluate performance. 2. 4. Organisation and resources Environmental audits must be performed by persons or groups of persons with appropriate knowledge of the including knowledge and experience on the relevant environmental, management, sectors and fields audited, technical and regulatory issues, and sufficient training and proficiency in the specific skills of auditing to achieve the stated objectives. The resources and time allocated to the audit must be commensurate with the scope and objectives of the audit. The top organisation management shall support the auditing. The auditors shall be sufficiently independent of the activities they audit to make an objective and impartial judgement. 2. 5. Planning and preparation for an audit Each audit will be planned and prepared with the objectives, in particular, of: (cid:151) ensuring the appropriate resources are allocated, (cid:151) ensuring that each individual involved in the audit process (including auditors, management, and staff) understands his or her role and responsibilities. Preparation will include familiarisation with activities of the organisation and with the environmental management system established there and review of the findings and conclusions of previous audits. C 212 E/18 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 25. 7. 2000 2. 6. Audit activities Audit activities will include discussions with personnel, inspection of operating conditions and equipment and reviewing of records, written procedures and other relevant documentation, with the objective of evaluating the environmental performance of the activity being audited to determine whether it meets the applicable standards, regulations or objectives and targets set and whether the system in place to manage environmental responsibilities is effective and appropriate. Spot-checking of compliance with these criteria may be used to determine the effec- tiveness of the system. The following steps, in particular, will be included in the audit process: (a) understanding of the management systems; (b) assessing strengths and weaknesses of the management systems; (c) gathering relevant evidence; (d) evaluating audit findings; (e) preparing audit conclusions; (f) reporting audit findings and conclusions. 2. 7. Reporting audit findings and conclusions 1. A written audit report of the appropriate form and content will be prepared by the auditors to ensure full, formal submission of the findings and conclusions of the audit, at the end of each audit and audit cycle. The findings and conclusions of the audit must be formally communicated to the top organisation management. 2. The fundamental objectives of a written audit report are: (a) to document the scope of the audit; (b) to provide management with information on the state of compliance with the a organisations’ environmental policy and the environmental progress at the organisation; (c) to provide management with information on the effectiveness and reliability of the arrangements for monitoring environmental impacts of the organisation; (d) to demonstrate the need for corrective action, where appropriate. 2. 8. Audit follow-up The audit process will culminate in the preparation and implementation of a plan of appropriate corrective action. Appropriate mechanisms must be in place and in operation to ensure that the audit results are followed up. 2. 9. Audit frequency The frequency with which any activity is audited will vary depending upon the (a) nature, scale and complexity of the activities; (b) significance of associated environmental impacts (c) importance and urgency of the problems detected by previous audits; (d) history of environmental problems. More complex activities with a greater risk of environmental harm will be audited more frequently. An organisation shall define its own audit programme and audit frequency taking account of Commission guidance. 25. 7. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 212 E/19 ANNEX III ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT INITIAL PROPOSAL AMENDED PROPOSAL 3. 1. Introduction 3. 1. Introduction information regarding the environmental The aim of the environmental statement is to provide environ- impact and mental performance of the organisation. It is also a vehicle to address the stakeholder requirements identified as a result of Annex I B 3 and considered as significant by the organisation (Annex VI 4 d). Although the organisation is not required to produce the information detailed in 3. 2 in a single report it is important that this information can be presented in a clear and coherent manner in hard copy to those who have no other means of obtaining this information. requirements information regarding the environmental The aim of the environmental statement is to provide environ- impact and mental performance of the organisation. It is also a vehicle to address the interested parties’ identified as a result of Annex I B 3 and considered as significant by the organisation (Annex VI 4 d). Although the organisation is not required to produce the information detailed in 3. 2 in a single report it is important that this information can be presented in a clear and coherent manner in hard copy to those who have no other means of obtaining this information. 3. 2. Environmental statement 3. 2. Environmental statement information, Upon its first registration an organisation shall produce environ- mental the environmental to be referred to as statement, to be validated by the environmental verifier. This information must be submitted to the competent body following validation, and then be made publicly available. information, Upon its first registration an organisation shall produce environ- mental the environmental to be referred to as statement, to be validated by the environmental verifier. This information must be submitted to the competent body following validation, and then be made publicly available. The environmental statement is a tool for communication and dialogue with interested parties regarding environmental performance. The organisation shall consider the information needs of the public and other interested parties when writing and designing the environmental statement. The minimum requirements for follows: this information shall be as Unchanged (a) A clear and unambiguous description of the organisation regis- tering to EMAS and a summary of its activities, products and services and its relationship to any parent organisations as appropriate (b) The environmental policy of the organisation (c) A description of all the significant environmental impacts of that the nature of the organisation and an explanation of impact (d) A description of the environmental objectives and targets in relation to the significant environmental impacts (e) A summary of the data available on the performance of the organisation against its environmental objectives and targets with respect to its significant environmental impacts (f) Other factors regarding environmental performance (g) The name and accreditation number of the environmental verifier and the date of validation The Commission shall lay down guidelines concerning the form and minimum content of the environmental statements in order to improve their clarity and uniformity. 3. 3. Maintenance of publicly available information Unchanged The organisation must update the information detailed in 3. 2 yearly and shall have any changes validated yearly by an environ- mental verifier. After validation changes shall also be submitted to the competent body and be made publicly available. C 212 E/20 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 25. 7. 2000 INITIAL PROPOSAL AMENDED PROPOSAL 3. 4. Publication of information 3. 4. Publication of information Organisations may wish to address specific audiences with the information generated by its environmental management system and use only selected information from the environmental statement. Any environmental information published by an organi- sation can bear the EMAS logo provided it has been validated by an environmental verifier as being: Organisations may wish to address different audiences or interested parties with the information generated by its environmental management system and use only selected information from the environmental information published by an organisation can bear the EMAS logo provided it has been validated by an environmental verifier as being: statement. Any environmental (a) Accurate and non deceptive (b) Substantiated and verifiable (a) Accurate and non deceptive (b) Substantiated and verifiable (c) Relevant and used in an appropriate context or setting (c) Relevant and used in an appropriate context or setting (d) Representative of the overall environmental performance of the (d) Representative of the overall environmental performance of the organisation organisation (e) Unlikely to result in misinterpretation (e) Unlikely to result in misinterpretation and makes reference to the environmental statement from which it was drawn. and makes reference to the environmental statement from which it was drawn. 3. 5. Local accountability Unchanged environmental Organisations registering to EMAS may wish to produce one a number of corporate statement different geographic locations. The intention of EMAS is to ensure local accountability and thus organisations must ensure that where sites have significant environmental impacts these are clearly identified and reported within the corporate statement. covering 3. 6. Public availability The information generated in 3. 2 a-g which forms the environ- mental statement for an organisation and the updated information specified in 3. 3 must be publicly available. This does not mean that an organisation must publish and print one single document and distribute it on request. Organisations are encouraged to use libraries etc. ) The all methods available (electronic publication, organisation must be able to demonstrate to the environmental verifier in the organisations environmental performance can easily and freely gain access to the information required in 3. 2 a-g and 3. 3. individuals with an interest that 3. 7. Performance reporting 3. 7. Performance reporting The raw data generated by an environmental management system will be used in a number of different ways to show the environ- mental performance of an organisation. If an organisation uses environmental performance indicators (e. g. energy usage per tonne of product) it must ensure that any performance indicators it selects: (a) Give an accurate appraisal of the organisations performance (b) Are understandable and unambiguous (c) Allow for year on year comparison of an organisations performance (d) Allow for comparison with sector, national or regional benchmarks as appropriate (e) Allow for comparison with regulatory requirements as appro- priate. The raw data generated by an environmental management system will be used in a number of different ways to show the environ- are mental performance of encouraged to use environmental performance indicators where appropriate (e. g. energy usage per tonne of product). In this case, the organisation must ensure that any performance indicators it selects: an organisation. Organisations (a) Give an accurate appraisal of the organisations performance (b) Are understandable and unambiguous (c) Allow for year on year comparison of an organisations performance (d) Allow for comparison with sector, national or regional benchmarks as appropriate (e) Allow for comparison with regulatory requirements as appro- priate. 25. 7. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 212 E/21 ANNEX IV Logo P. M. ANNEX V ACCREDITATION, SUPERVISION AND FUNCTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL VERIFIERS 5. 1. General The accreditation of environmental verifiers shall be based on the following general principles of competence. Accreditation bodies may choose to accredit individuals, organisations or both, as environmental verifiers. The procedural requirements and detailed criteria for accrediting environmental verifiers are defined according to Article 4 of this Regulation by national accreditation systems in conformity with these principles. It will be ensured through the peer review process established by Article 4. 5. 2. Requirements for the accreditation environmental verifiers 5. 2. 1. The following competence constitutes the minimum requirements with which a verifier, individual or organisation, shall comply: (cid:151) Knowledge and understanding of the Regulation, relevant standards and guidance issued by the Commission, under Article 4 and 14, for the use of this Regulation (cid:151) Knowledge and understanding of the legislative, regulatory and other policy requirements relevant to the activity subject to verification (cid:151) Knowledge and understanding of environmental issues (cid:151) Knowledge and understanding of the technical aspects, relevant to environmental issues, of the activity subject to verification (cid:151) Understanding of the general functioning of the activity subject to verification in order to assess the appropriateness of the management system (cid:151) Knowledge and understanding of environmental auditing requirements and methodology (cid:151) Knowledge of information audit (Environmental Statement) In addition, the verifier shall be independent, impartial and objective in performing his activities. 5. 2. 2. Scope of accreditation The scope of accreditation of environmental verifiers shall be defined according to the classification of economic activities (NACE codes) as established by Council Regulation (EEC) No 761/93 (OJ L 83 3. 4. 1993). The competence and size of the scope of accreditation of the verifier shall be commensurate to the size and complexity of the organisation to be verified. 5. 2. 3. Additional requirements for the accreditation of individual environmental verifiers performing verifications on their own. Individual environmental verifiers performing verification on their own, in addition to complying with the requirements of 5. 2, shall have: (cid:151) all the necessary competence to perform verifications, in their accredited fields, (cid:151) a limited scope of accreditation dependant on their personal competence. Compliance with these requirements will be ensured through the supervisory role of the accreditation body. C 212 E/22 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 25. 7. 2000 5. 3. Supervision of environmental verifiers 5. 3. 1. Supervision of accredited environmental verifiers by the accreditation body which granted their accreditation The accredited environmental verifier must immediately inform the accreditation body of all changes which have bearing on the accreditation or its scope. Provision shall be made, at regular intervals not exceeding 12 months, to ensure that the accredited environmental verifier continues to comply with the accreditation requirements and to monitor the quality of the verifications undertaken. Supervision may consist in questionnaires, review of environmental statements validated by the verifiers, review of verification report, witnessing in organisations. It should be proportionate with the activity undertaken by the verifier. Any decision taken by the accreditation body to terminate or suspend accreditation or curtail the scope of accreditation shall be taken only after the accredited environmental verifier has had the possibility of a hearing. 5. 3. 2. Supervision of accredited environmental verifiers by the accreditation body of the Member States where the verification takes place A verifier accredited in one Member State, before performing verification activities in another Member State, shall only provide to the accreditation body of the latter Member State, at least four weeks in advance, notification of: (cid:151) his accreditation details, and team composition if appropriate (cid:151) when and where the verification will occur: address and contact details of the organisation, measures taken to deal with legal and language knowledge if necessary This notification shall be communicated before each new verification. The accreditation body shall not require other conditions which would prejudice the right of the verifier to provide services in another Member State than the one where accreditation was granted. It shall not also use the notification procedure to delay the venue of the verifier. Any difficulty to supervise the verifier on the date communicated shall be adequately justified. If the supervising accreditation body is not satisfied with the quality of the work done by the verifier, the supervision report shall be transmitted to the verifier concerned, the accreditation body which granted the accreditation, to the competent body where the organisation being verified is located and the forum of accreditation body. 5. 4. The function of verifiers 5. 4. 1. The function of the verifier is to check, without prejudice to the enforcement powers of Member States in respect of regulatory requirements: (a) compliance with all the requirements of this Regulation: initial environmental review if appropriate, environmental management system, environmental audit programme and the environmental statement (b) the reliability of the data and information in: (cid:151) The environmental statement (Annex III 3. 2 and 3. 3) (cid:151) Extracts from the environmental statement (Annex III 3. 4) (cid:151) Environmental information (Article 8. 3) The verifier will, in particular, investigate in a sound professional manner, the technical validity of the initial environmental review, if appropriate, or audit or other procedures carried out by the organisation, without unnecessarily duplicating those procedures. 25. 7. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 212 E/23 5. 4. 2. At the time of the first verification, the environmental verifier shall, in particular, check that the following requirements are met by the organisation: (cid:151) A fully operational environmental management system in accordance with Annex I (cid:151) A fully planned audit programme, which had already begun (At least one audit performed of the activity with the highest environmental risk) in accordance with Annex II (cid:151) Completion of one management review (cid:151) The preparation of an environmental statement in accordance with Annex III 3. 2 5. 4. 3. Legal compliance The verifier should establish that an organisation has procedures in place to control those aspects of its operations subject to relevant Community or national laws and that these procedures are capable of delivering compliance. The checks of the audit will, in particular, provide for evidence on the capability of the procedures in place to deliver legal compliance. The verifier should not validate the environmental statement, if during the verification process he observes, for example through spot-checks, that the organisation is obviously not in legal compliance. 5. 4. 4. Organisation definition When verifying the EMS and validating the environmental statement, the verifier shall ensure that the components of the organisation are unambiguously defined and corresponds to a real division of the activities. The content of the statement shall clearly cover the different parts of the organisation to which EMAS applies. 5. 5. Conditions for the verifier to perform his activities 5. 5. 1. The verifier will operate on the basis of a written agreement with the organisation which defines the scope of the work, enables the verifier to operate in an independent professional manner and commits the organisation to providing the necessary cooperation. 5. 5. 2. The verification will in particular, interviews with personnel, preparation of a report to the organisations’ management and the organisations’ solution of the issues raised by the report. involve examination of documentation, a visit to the organisation including, 5. 5. 3. The documentation to be examined in advance of the visit will include basis information about the organisation and activities there, the environmental policy and programme, the description of the environ- mental management system in operation in the organisation, details of the previous initial environmental review or audit carried out, the report on that review or audit and on any corrective action taken afterwards, and the draft environmental statement. 5. 5. 4. The verifier shall prepare a report for the organisations’ management. This report shall specify: (a) all issues relevant to the work carried out by the verifier (b) the starting point of the organisation towards implementation of an environmental management system (c) in general, cases of non-conformity with the provisions of this Regulation, and in particular; (cid:151) technical defects in the initial environmental review, or audit method, or environmental management system, or any other relevant process; (cid:151) points of disagreement with the draft environmental statement, together with details of the amendments or additions that should be made to the environmental statement (d) the comparison with the previous statements and the performance assessment of the organisation. 5. 6. Verification frequency The verifier shall at intervals not exceeding 12 months validate any updated information in the environmental statement. In addition, in consultation with the organisation he will design a programme to ensure that all elements required for registration to EMAS are verified in a period not exceeding 36 months. The frequency of the visits of the environmental verifier to the organisation shall take into account Commission guidance. C 212 E/24 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 25. 7. 2000 ANNEX VI ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS 6. 1. General In order to decide on its significant environmental impacts an organisation shall consider all environmental aspects of its activities, products and services and decide on the basis of criteria, defined by the organisation, which of its environmental aspects have a significant impact. An organisation shall consider both direct and indirect environmental aspects of its activities, products and services. 6. 2. Direct environmental aspects These cover the activities of an organisation over which it has management control and are local to the organi- sation and may include but is not limited to (a) emissions to air (b) releases to water (c) waste management. (d) contamination of land (e) use of natural resources and raw materials (including energy) (f) local issues (noise, vibration, odour, visual appearance, etc. ) (g) transport issues (both for goods and services and employees) In assessing the significance of the environmental impacts of these activities the organisation shall think not only of normal operating conditions but also of start up and shut down conditions and of reasonably foreseeable emergency conditions. Account shall be taken of past, present and planned activities, products and services. 6. 3. Indirect environmental aspects As a result of the activities, products and services of an organisation there may be significant environmental impacts over which it does not have management control or occur at a distance from the organisation. These may include but are not limited to (a) product related issues (design, packaging, transportation, use and waste recovery/disposal) (b) capital investments, granting loans and insurance services (c) new markets (d) choice and composition of services (e. g. transport or the catering trade) (e) administrative and planning decisions (f) product range compositions In addition, organisations must be able to demonstrate that the significant environmental aspects associated with their procurement procedures have been identified and that significant impacts associated with these aspects are addressed within the management system. The environmental aspects shall be relevant within the framework of the environmental programme, the environ- mental management system and the environmental audit insofar as the organisation has set itself objectives. In the case of these indirect environmental aspects an organisation should consider how much influence it can have over these aspects, and what measures can be taken to reduce the impact. 25. 7. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 212 E/25 6. 4. Significance It is the responsibility of the organisation to define criteria for assessing the significance of the environmental aspects of its activities, products and services. It is not intended that a detailed life cycle analysis is carried out however the criteria developed by an organisation should be comprehensive, capable of independent checking, and reproducible. Considerations in establishing the significance of an organisation’s environmental aspects may include but is not limited to: (a) identification of activities, products and services of the organisation’s operations, the specific environmental aspects associated with those activities, products and services, and the type of impact related to each environ- mental aspect. (b) collection of information about the condition of the environment to identify activities, products and services of the organisation that may have an impact on specific conditions. (c) assessment of the organisation’s existing data on material and energy inputs, discharges, wastes and emissions data in terms of risk. (d) identification of the views of stakeholders and the use of this information to help establish the organisation’s significant environmental aspects. (e) identification of environmental activities of the organisation that are regulated, for which data have likely been collected by the organisation. (f) identification of procurement activities that are significant in terms of the direct and indirect environmental impacts of the organisation (g) consideration of the design, development, manufacturing, distribution, servicing, use, re-use, recycling and disposal of the organisation’s products. (h) identification of those activities of the organisation with the most significant environmental costs, benefits or other financial effects. C 212 E/26 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 25. 7. 2000 ANNEX VII INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 7. 1. General An organisation with no existing environmental management system recognised under Article 9 must initially establish its current position with regard to the environment by means of a review. The aim should be to consider all environmental aspects of the organisation as a basis for establishing the environmental management system. 7. 2. Requirements The review should cover four key areas: (a) legislative and regulatory requirements; (b) an identification of significant environmental aspects; (c) an examination of all existing environmental management practices and procedures; (d) an evaluation of feedback from the investigation of previous incidents In all cases, consideration should be given to normal and abnormal operations within the organisation, and to potential emergency conditions. A suitable approach to the review may include checklists, interviews, direct inspection and measurement, results of previous audits or other reviews depending on the nature of the activities. The process to identify the significant environmental aspects associated with the activities at operating units should where relevant, consider (a) emissions to air (b) releases to water (c) waste management (d) contamination of land (e) use of raw materials and natural resources (f) other local environmental and community issues This process should consider normal operating conditions, shut-down and start-up conditions, as well as the realistic potential significant impacts associated with reasonably foreseeable or emergency situations. The process is intended to identify significant environmental aspects associated with activities, products or services and is not intended to require a detailed life cycle assessment. Organisations do not have to evaluate each product, component or raw material input. They may select categories of activities, products or services to identify those aspects most likely to have a significant impact. 25. 7. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 212 E/27 ANNEX VIII REGISTRATION INFORMATION Minimum Requirements Name of the organisation:. Address of the organisation:. Contact person:. NACE code of activity:. Number of employees:. Name of the verifier:. Accreditation number:. Scope of accreditation:. Date of the next environmental statement:. Name and contact details of the competent enforcement authority for the organisation:. Done at. on. 199. Signature of the representative of the organisation


title: Πρόταση κανονισμού (ΕΚ) του Συμβουλίου για την επιβολή οριστικών δασμών αντιντάμπινγκ και την οριστική είσπραξη των προσωρινών δασμών που επιβλήθηκαν στις εισαγωγές συρμάτων από ανοξείδωτους χάλυβες με διάμετρο 1 mm ή μεγαλύτερη, καταγωγής Ινδίας, και την περάτωση της διαδικασίας σχετικά με τις εισαγωγές συρμάτων από ανοξείδωτους χάλυβες με διάμετρο 1 mm ή μεγαλύτερη καταγωγής Δημοκρατίας της Κορέας

eurovoc_concepts:
South Korea
anti-dumping duty
import
steel
wire


title: Ehdotus neuvoston päätökseksi 4-MTA:n määrittelemisestä valvontatoimenpiteiden ja rikosoikeudellisten seuraamusten piiriin saatettavaksi uudeksi synteettiseksi huumausaineeksi

eurovoc_concepts:
UN convention
exchange of information
narcotic
new product
public health

formats: html pdf

text: EUROOPAN YHTEISÖJEN KOMISSIO Bryssel, 23. 6. 1999 KOM(1999) 307 lopullinen Ehdotus NEUVOSTON PÄÄTÖKSEKSI 4-MTA:n määrittelemisestä valvontatoimenpiteiden ja rikosoikeudellisten seuraamusten piiriin saatettavaksi uudeksi synteettiseksi huumausaineeksi (komission esittämä) PERUSTELUT I. JOHDANTO Euroopan komissio panee synteettisistä tyytyväisenä merkille, huumausaineista 16 päivänä kesäkuuta 1997 hyväksytyn yhteisen toiminnan (97/396/YOS) laadittu ja puheenjohtajavaltion helmi- kuussa 1999 pyytämä kertomus 4-MTA:n riskien arvioinnista on valmistunut. säännösten mukaisesti että uusista riskejä arvioitiin 4-MTA:n (P-metyylitioamfetamiini eli 4-metyylitioamfetamiini) Euroopan huumausaineiden ja niiden väärinkäytön seurantakeskuksen (EMCDDA) kokoon kutsumassa ja EMCDDA:n tiedekomitean johdolla Lissabonissa 18 ja 19 päivänä huhtikuuta 1999 pidetyssä erityiskokouksessa. Tämä oli toinen yhteisen toiminnan 4 artiklan mukaisesti suoritettu riskien arviointi. 4-MTA tunnistettiin ensi kerran vuonna 1997 Alankomaissa ja Yhdistyneessä kuningaskunnassa. Tällä hetkellä aine on valvonnan kohteena kahdessa jäsenvaltiossa. toistaiseksi ole merkitty psykotrooppisista aineista vuonna 1971 tehdyn Sitä ei Yhdistyneiden kansakuntien yleissopimuksen luetteloihin. 4-MTA:lla ei ole varsinaista teollista käyttöä. Sen lähtöaineet ovat kaupallisesti saatavilla eikä niillä liene psykoaktiivisia vaikutuksia. II. 4-MTA:N RISKIT Komissio on tutustunut tarkoin riskien arvioinnin tuloksista laaditun kertomuksen päätelmiin. Niiden mukaan 4-MTA on voimakas psykoaktiivinen aine, josta ilmeisesti ei ole hyötyä sairauksien hoidossa. Sen arvellaan olleen osallisena viidessä kuolemantapauksessa EU:n alueella ja lisäksi kymmenessä muussa sairaalahoitoa vaatineessa tapauksessa. Joissakin tapauksissa 4-MTA:n on todettu aiheuttaneen hengityselinten äkillistä vajaatoimintaa. Aineen vaikutuksen hitauden vuoksi käyttäjillä on kiusaus ottaa kerralla useita tabletteja, mikä näyttää lisäävän yliannostuksen vaaraa. Myös 4-MTA:n nauttiminen yhdessä alkoholin, MDMA:n, amfetamiinien tai efedriinin kanssa lisännee riskiä. Lisäksi sen nauttiminen tiettyjen ravintoaineiden yhteydessä saattaa aiheuttaa vakavia yhdistelmävaikutuksia. Akuuttien vaikutusten, kuten kielteisten reaktioiden ja yliannostuksen, riski näyttää olevan suurempi 4-MTA:ta kuin MDMA:ta käytettäessä. Rikostutkimuksista voidaan todeta, että kolmessa jäsenvaltiossa (Belgia, Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta ja Alankomaat) on takavarikoitu huomattavia määriä 4-MTA- tabletteja. Saksassa ainetta on takavarikoitu pieniä määriä. Kahdessa jäsenvaltiossa on todettu 4-MTA:ta kaupattavan yhdessä muiden laittomien aineiden kanssa. Joidenkin tietojen mukaan aineen kauppa on yleistymässä. 2 III. EHDOTUS NEUVOSTON PÄÄTÖKSEKSI ehdotus Edellä esitettyjen näkökohtien perusteella komissio katsoo, että on aiheellista esittää ja neuvostolle rikosoikeudellisten synteettisistä huumausaineista 16 päivänä kesäkuuta 1997 hyväksytyn yhteisen toiminnan (97/396/YOS) 5 artiklan 1 kohdan kolmannen alakohdan mukaisesti. valvontatoimenpiteiden koko EU:ssa seuraamusten saattamisesta 4-MTA:n uusista piiriin 3 Ehdotus NEUVOSTON PÄÄTÖKSEKSI 4-MTA:n määrittelemisestä valvontatoimenpiteiden ja rikosoikeudellisten seuraamusten piiriin saatettavaksi uudeksi synteettiseksi huumausaineeksi EUROOPAN UNIONIN NEUVOSTO, joka ottaa huomioon Euroopan unionista tehdyn sopimuksen, ottaa huomioon yhteisen toiminnan (97/396/YOS) 16 päivältä kesäkuuta 1997, jonka neuvosto on hyväksynyt Euroopan unionista tehdyn sopimuksen K. 3 artiklan perusteella, uusia synteettisiä huumausaineita koskevasta tiedonvaihdosta, riskien arvioinnista ja valvonnasta1, ja erityisesti sen 5 artiklan 1 kohdan, ottaa huomioon komission aloitteen, sekä katsoo seuraavaa: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 1 Euroopan huumausaineiden ja niiden väärinkäytön seurantakeskus (EMCDDA) on yhteisen toiminnan 97/396/YOS 4 artiklan 3 kohdan mukaisesti laatinut kertomuksen 4-MTA:han (P-metyylitioamfetamiini eli 4-metyylitioamfetamiini) liittyvien riskien arvioinnista. 4-MTA on amfetamiinijohdannainen, johon liittyvien akuuttien vaikutusten, kuten kielteisten reaktioiden ja yliannostuksen, riski näyttää olevan suurempi kuin MDMA (3,4-metyleenidioksidimetamfetamiinilla); sen uskotaan olleen osallisena useissa yhteisön alueella sattuneissa kuolemantapauksissa ja muissa sairaalahoitoa vaatineissa tapauksissa. kansanterveydelle 4-MTA:n useissa jäsenvaltioissa. 4-MTA on tällä hetkellä valvonnan kohteena kahdessa jäsenvaltiossa. aiheuttamat tunnistettu riskit on 4-MTA on voimakas psykoaktiivinen aine, jota ei toistaiseksi ole merkitty psykotrooppisista aineista vuonna 1971 tehdyn Yhdistyneiden kansakuntien yleissopimuksen yleissopimuksen aiheuttaa ensimmäisessä luettelossa mainittuihin aineisiin verrattavan kansanterveyteen kohdistuvan vakavan vaaran ja josta ei näytä olevan hyötyä sairauksien hoidossa. luetteloihin, mutta toisessa joka ja On ilmennyt, että joissakin jäsenvaltioissa 4-MTA:ta on kaupattu yhdessä muiden laittomien aineiden kanssa. EYVL L 167, 25. 6. 1997, s. 1. 4 6) saatettava jäsenvaltioissa niiden valvontatoimenpiteiden ja 4-MTA olisi rikosoikeudellisten seuraamusten piiriin, joista määrätään psykotrooppisista aineista vuonna 1971 tehdyssä Yhdistyneiden Kansakuntien yleissopimuksessa määrättyjen, yleissopimuksen I ja II luettelossa mainittuja aineita koskevien velvoitteiden mukaisessa jäsenvaltioiden kansallisessa lainsäädännössä, ON PÄÄTTÄNYT SEURAAVAA: 1 artikla 4-MTA:n (P-metyylitioamfetamiini tarvittavat Jäsenvaltioiden on toteutettava kansallisen lainsäädäntönsä mukaiset toimenpiteet 4-metyylitioamfetamiini) saattamiseksi niiden valvontatoimenpiteiden ja rikosoikeudellisten seuraamusten piiriin, tehdyssä Yhdistyneiden kansakuntien yleissopimuksessa määrättyjen, yleissopimuksen I ja II luettelossa mainittuja aineita koskevien velvoitteiden mukaisessa jäsenvaltioiden kansallisessa lainsäädännössä. psykotrooppisista säädetään aineista vuonna joista 1971 eli 2 artikla Jäsenvaltioiden on yhteisen toiminnan 97/396/YOS 5 artiklan 1 kohdan kolmannen toimenpiteet kolmen toteutettava 1 artiklassa tarkoitetut alakohdan mukaisesti kuukauden kuluessa tämän päätöksen voimaantulosta. 3 artikla Tämä päätös julkaistaan Euroopan yhteisöjen virallisessa lehdessä. Tämä päätös tulee voimaan julkaisemista seuraavana päivänä. Tehty Brysselissä Neuvoston puolesta Puheenjohtaja 5


title: Proposition de Règlement (CE) du Conseil instituant un droit compensateur définitif et portant perception définitive du droit provisoire institué sur les fils en aciers inoxydables d'un diamètre égal ou supérieur à 1 millimètre originaires de l'Inde et clôturant la procédure concernant les importations de fils en aciers inoxydables d'un diamètre égal ou supérieur à 1 millimètre originaires de la république de Corée

eurovoc_concepts:
South Korea
anti-dumping duty
import
originating product
steel
wire


title: Reglamento (CE) n° 1330/1999 de la Comisión, de 23 de junio de 1999, por el que se determina en qué medida se podrá dar curso a las solicitudes de derechos de importación presentadas con arreglo al Reglamento (CE) n° 995/1999 en el sector de la carne de vacuno

eurovoc_concepts:
CCT duties
beef
import
tariff quota

formats: pdf print

text: 24. 6. 1999 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas L 157/41 REGLAMENTO (CE) No 1330/1999 DE LA COMISIÓN de 23 de junio de 1999 por el que se determina en qué medida se podrá dar curso a las solicitudes de derechos de importación presentadas con arreglo al Reglamento (CE) no 995/1999 en el sector de la carne de vacuno LA COMISIÓN DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS, HA ADOPTADO EL PRESENTE REGLAMENTO: Visto el Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Europea, Visto el Reglamento (CE) no 995/1999 de la Comisión, de 11 de mayo de 1999, relativo a la apertura y modo de gestión de un contingente arancelario de carne de vacuno congelada del código NC 0202 y los productos del código NC 0206 29 91 (del 1 de julio de 1999 hasta el 30 de junio de 2000) (1) y, en particular, su artículo 5, Considerando que el Reglamento (CE) no 995/1999 prevé, en particular, que las cantidades reservadas a los importa- dores tradicionales se asignarán proporcionalmente a las importaciones realizadas durante el período del 1 de julio de 1996 al 31 de marzo de 1999 al amparo de los Regla- mentos (CE) nos 1141/96 (2), 1042/97 (3), modificado por el Reglamento (CE) no 260/98 (4), y 1142/98 (5) de la Comi- sión; que, en los restantes casos, las cantidades solicitadas superan las cantidades disponibles en virtud del apartado 2 del artículo 2 del mismo Reglamento; que, en estas condiciones, conviene reducir de forma proporcional las cantidades solicitadas con arreglo a lo dispuesto en el apartado 2 del artículo 5 del Reglamento (CE) no 995/ 1999, Artículo 1 Cada solicitud de derecho de importación presentada con arreglo a las disposiciones del Reglamento (CE) no 995/ 1999 se satisfará hasta las cantidades máximas siguientes: a) 278,967 kilogramos por tonelada importada durante el período del 1 de julio de 1996 al 31 de marzo de 1999 al amparo de los Reglamentos (CE) nos 1141/96, 1042/ 97 y 1142/98, en lo que concierne a los importadores mencionados en la letra a) del apartado 1 del artículo 2, punto a) del Reglamento (CE) no 995/1999; b) 7,423 toneladas por solicitud, en lo que concierne a los agentes económicos mencionados en la letra b) del apartado 1 del artículo 2 del Reglamento (CE) no 995/ 1999. Artículo 2 El presente Reglamento entrará en vigor el 24 de junio de 1999. El presente Reglamento será obligatorio en todos sus elementos y directamente aplicable en cada Estado miembro. Hecho en Bruselas, el 23 de junio de 1999. Por la Comisión Franz FISCHLER Miembro de la Comisión (1) DO L 122 de 12. 5. 1999, p. 3. (2) DO L 151 de 26. 6. 1996, p. 9. (3) DO L 152 de 11. 6. 1997, p. 2. (4) DO L 25 de 31. 1. 1998, p. 42. (5) DO L 159 de 3. 6. 1998, p. 11


title: Forslag til Rådets forordning (EF) om indførelse af en endelig udligningstold og endelig opkrævning af den midlertidige told på importen af tråd af rustfrit stål af diameter under 1 mm med oprindelse i Indien og om afslutning af proceduren vedrørende importen af tråd af rustfrit stål af diameter under 1 mm med oprindelse i Republikken Korea


title: Règlement (CE) n° 1323/1999 de la Commission, du 23 juin 1999, modifiant le règlement (CE) n° 1474/95 portant ouverture et mode de gestion dans le secteur des oeufs et pour les ovalbumines de contingents tarifaires

eurovoc_concepts:
CCT duties
animal protein
egg
egg product
import
tariff quota

formats: html pdf print

text: 24. 6. 1999 FR Journal officiel des Communautés européennes L 157/29 RÈGLEMENT (CE) No 1323/1999 DE LA COMMISSION du 23 juin 1999 modifiant le règlement (CE) no 1474/95 portant ouverture et mode de gestion dans le secteur des œufs et pour les ovalbumines de contingents tarifaires LA COMMISSION DES COMMUNAUTÉS EUROPÉENNES, (3) vu le traité instituant la Communauté européenne, vu le règlement (CE) no 1095/96 du Conseil du 18 juin 1996 concernant la mise en œuvre des concessions figu- rant sur la liste CXL établie à la suite de la conclusion des négociations au titre de l’article XXIV:6 du GATT (1), et notamment son article 1er, (1) (2) considérant que, dans le cadre de l’Organisation mondiale du commerce, la Communauté s’est engagée à ouvrir des contingents tarifaires pour certains produits dans le secteur des œufs et pour l’ovalbumine; qu’il y a lieu dès lors d’établir les modalités d’application pour ces contingents pour la période du 1er juillet 1999 au 30 juin 2000; considérant que le règlement (CE) no 1474/95 de la Commission (2), modifié en dernier le règlement (CE) no 1371/98 (3), a prévu la gestion de ces contingents pour la période du 1er juillet 1998 au 30 juin 1999 qu’il convient d’en prévoir la gestion pour la période du 1er juillet 1999 au 30 juin 2000; lieu par considérant que les mesures prévues au présent règlement sont conformes à l’avis du comité de gestion des œufs et de la viande de volaille, A ARRÊTÉ LE PRÉSENT RÈGLEMENT: Article premier Le règlement (CE) no 1474/95 est modifié comme suit. 1) L’article 1er est remplacé par le texte suivant: «Article premier Pour la période du 1er juillet 1999 au 30 juin 2000, les contingents tarifaires d’importation figurant à l’annexe I sont ouverts pour les groupes de produits et aux conditions y prévues. » 2) L’annexe I est remplacée par l’annexe du présent règlement. Article 2 Le présent règlement entre en vigueur le 1er juillet 1999. Le présent règlement est obligatoire dans tous ses éléments et directement applicable dans tout État membre. Fait à Bruxelles, le 23 juin 1999. Par la Commission Franz FISCHLER Membre de la Commission (1) JO L 146 du 20. 6. 1996, p. 1. (2) JO L 145 du 29. 6. 1995, p. 19. (3) JO L 185 du 30. 6. 1998, p. 17. L 157/30 FR Journal officiel des Communautés européennes 24. 6. 1999 ANNEXE «ANNEXE I Droit du tarif douanier commun applicable en EUR par tonne poids produit Contingents tarifaires du 1er juillet 1999 au 30 juin 2000 (en tonnes) 152 711 310 331 687 176 617 83 122 060 6 821 (1) 13 945 (1) Numéro du groupe E 1 E 2 E 3 Code NC 0407 00 30 0408 11 80 0408 19 81 0408 19 89 0408 91 80 0408 99 80 3502 11 90 3502 19 90 (1) Équivalent-œufs en coquille. Conversion selon les taux forfaitaires de rendement fixés à l’annexe 77 du règlement (CEE) no 2454/93 (JO no L 253 du 11. 10. 1993, p. 1). »


title: Dictamen del Banco Central Europeo, de 23 de junio de 1999, a instancias de la Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas respecto de un proyecto de Reglamento (CE) de la Comisión por el que se establecen determinadas disposiciones de aplicación del Reglamento (CE) nº 2494/95 del Consejo en lo que respecta a las normas mínimas para el tratamiento de los seguros en los índices de precios al consumo armonizados y por el que se modifica el Reglamento (CE) nº 2214/96 de la Comisión (CON/99/06)

eurovoc_concepts:
European Central Bank
consumer price
goods and services
harmonisation of prices
insurance
price index

text: C 252/4 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 3. 9. 1999 BANCO CENTRAL EUROPEO DICTAMEN DEL BANCO CENTRAL EUROPEO de 23 de junio de 1999 a instancias de la Comisi(cid:243)n de las Comunidades Europeas respecto de un proyecto de Reglamento (CE) de la Comisi(cid:243)n por el que se establecen determinadas disposiciones de aplicaci(cid:243)n del Regla- mento (CE) no 2494/95 del Consejo en lo que respecta a las normas m(cid:237)nimas para el tratamiento de los seguros en los (cid:237)ndices de precios al consumo armonizados y por el que se modifica el Reglamento (CE) no 2214/96 de la Comisi(cid:243)n (CON/99/06) (1999/C 252/05) 1. El 30 de marzo de 1999, el Banco Central Europeo (en lo sucesivo denominado «BCE») recibi(cid:243) una solicitud de con- sulta de la Comisi(cid:243)n con respecto a un proyecto de Regla- mento (CE) del Consejo relativo a las normas m(cid:237)nimas para el tratamiento de los seguros en los (cid:237)ndices de precios al consumo armonizados (IPCA) en lo sucesivo denominado «el proyecto de Reglamento»). 2. La postestad del BCE de emitir dictamen se fundamenta en el apartado 4 del art(cid:237)culo 105 del Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Europea y en el apartado 3 de art(cid:237)culo 5 del Reglamento (CE) no 2494/95 del Consejo, de 23 de octubre de 1995, relativo a los (cid:237)ndices de precios al consumo armo- nizados. De conformidad con la primera frase del apartado 5 de art(cid:237)culo 17 del reglamento interno del BCE, el presente Dictamen del BCE ha sido adoptado por el Consejo de Gobierno del BCE. 3. El objetivo del proyecto de Reglamento es establecer normas m(cid:237)nimas para el tratamiento de los seguros en los IPCA, los cuales se encuentran parcialmente incluidos en la cobertura inicial de los IPCA. De conformidad con el Reglamento (CE) no 1687/98 del Consejo, de 20 de julio de 1998, por el que se modifica el Reglamento (CE) no 1749/96 de la Comisi(cid:243)n en lo referente a la cobertura de bienes y servicios de los (cid:237)ndices de precios al consumo armonizados, esta cobertura se ampliarÆ a los seguros en diciembre de 1999. AdemÆs, el mencionado Reglamento del Consejo requiere que se deter- minen los criterios metodol(cid:243)gicos y el calendario para la ampliaci(cid:243)n de la cobertura, de conformidad con el procedi- miento establecido en el art(cid:237)culo 14 del Reglamento (CE) no 2494/95 del Consejo. El proyecto de Reglamento establece la metodolog(cid:237)a a seguir en el tratamiento de todos las se- guros cubiertos por las IPCA. 4. El poyecto de Reglamento establece dos principios funda- mentales. La ponderaci(cid:243)n de los seguros en el (cid:237)ndice se restringirÆ al importe impl(cid:237)cito del servicio que los hogares paguen por las p(cid:243)lizas de seguros como parte de la prima completa. El precio del seguro utilizado en el (cid:237)ndice variarÆ en funci(cid:243)n de la prima de seguro bruta correspondiente a la p(cid:243)liza espec(cid:237)fica que los hogares paguen. Asimismo, el pro- yecto de Reglamento establece normas para el ajuste de la calidad de los precios de los seguros y para el tratamiento de las p(cid:243)lizas de seguro indexadas. El BCE respalda las normas propuestas por la Comisi(cid:243)n dado que mejoran la comparabilidad de las IPCA. 5. El proyecto de Reglamento no contiene una referencia ex- presa a la fecha en que comenzarÆn a aplicarse las normas propuestas. El BCE presume que las normas se aplicarÆn a todos los IPCA a partir de diciembre de 1999, fecha en la que se inclu(cid:237)ran en los IPCA una categor(cid:237)a mÆs amplia de seguros. 6. El presente Dictamen del BCE se publicarÆ en el Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas. Hecho en Francfort del Meno, el 23 de junio de 1999. El Vicepresidente del BCE C. NOYER


title: Reglamento (CE) n° 1321/1999 de la Comisión de 23 de junio de 1999 por el que se establece el plan de previsiones de abastecimiento de determinados aceites vegetales a las islas Canarias

eurovoc_concepts:
Canary Islands
quantitative restriction
supply
supply balance sheet
vegetable oil

text: L 157/26 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 24. 6. 1999 REGLAMENTO (CE) No 1321/1999 DE LA COMISIÓN de 23 de junio de 1999 por el que se establece el plan de previsiones de abastecimiento de determinados aceites vegetales a las islas Canarias LA COMISIÓN DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS, HA ADOPTADO EL PRESENTE REGLAMENTO: Visto el Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Europea, Artículo 1 Visto el Reglamento (CEE) no 1601/92 del Consejo, de 15 de junio de 1992, sobre medidas específicas en favor de las islas Canarias relativas a determinados productos agra- rios (1), cuya última modificación la constituye el Regla- mento (CE) no 2348/96 (2), y, en particular, el apartado 4 de su artículo 3, (1) (2) (3) Considerando que, en aplicación de lo dispuesto en el artículo 2 del Reglamento (CEE) no 1601/92, es preciso establecer el plan de previsiones de abaste- cimiento de determinados aceites vegetales a las islas Canarias para la campaña 1999/2000; Considerando que esos planes se elaboran en función de las necesidades justificadas del consumo o de la industria de transformación, según los casos, comunicadas por las autoridades nacionales compe- tentes; Considerando que las medidas previstas en el presente Reglamento se ajustan al dictamen del Comité de gestión de las materias grasas, En la campaña 1999/2000, las cantidades del plan de previsiones de abastecimiento de determinados aceites vegetales a las islas Canarias a las que se aplicará la exención de los derechos de aduana de importación o la ayuda de abastecimiento desde el resto de la Comunidad serán las siguientes: (en toneladas) Código NC Designación de la mercancía Cantidades 1507 a 1516 (excepto 1509 y 1510) Aceites vegetales (excepto aceite de oliva) 34 500 (1) (1) De las que 24 500 están destinadas al sector de la transformación y/o del envasado. Artículo 2 El presente Reglamento entrará en vigor el día siguiente al de su publicación en el Diario Oficial de las Comuni- dades Europeas. Será aplicable desde el 1 de julio de 1999. El presente Reglamento será obligatorio en todos sus elementos y directamente aplicable en cada Estado miembro. Hecho en Bruselas, el 23 de junio de 1999. Por la Comisión Franz FISCHLER Miembro de la Comisión (1) DO L 173 de 27. 6. 1992, p. 13. (2) DO L 320 de 11. 12. 1996, p. 1


title: La politique européenne de concurrence 1998.

eurovoc_concepts:
State aid
State monopoly
competition law
competition policy
dominant position
international cooperation
merger control
report