title: Voorstel voor een Besluit van de Raad tot intrekking van de Besluiten 75/364/EEG, 77/454/EEG, 78/688/EEG, 78/1028/EEG, 80/156/EEG en 85/434/EEG houdende instelling van raadgevende comités voor de opleiding tot verantwoordelijk algemeen ziekenverpleger, beoefenaar der tandheelkunde, dierenarts, verloskundige, apotheker en arts

text: COMMISSIE VAN DE EUROPESE GEMEENSCHAPPEN Brussel, 15. 07. 1999 COM(1999) 177 def. Voorstel voor een BESLUIT VAN DE RAAD tot intrekking van de Besluiten 75/364/EEG, 77/454/EEG, 78/688/EEG, 78/1028/EEG, 80/156/EEG en 85/434/EEG houdende instelling van raadgevende comités voor de opleiding tot verantwoordelijk algemeen ziekenverpleger, beoefenaar der tandheelkunde, dierenarts, verloskundige, apotheker en arts (door de Commissie ingediend) Doel TOELICHTING Dit voorstel voor een besluit is een vervolg op de Mededeling aan de Raad en het Europees Parlement over het SLIM-initiatief1, die de Commissie op 6 november 1996 heeft ingediend. In deze mededeling heeft de Commissie met name te kennen gegeven, naar aanleiding van het verzoek van het SLIM-team “erkenning diploma’s”, dat zij voorstellen zou indienen tot rationalisering van de werking van de raadgevende comités voor de opleiding. De Commissie is voornemens om in 2000 officiële besluiten te nemen die gestalte geven aan de richtsnoeren die hierna onder punt 2 worden beschreven. Hervorming van de raadgevende comités Allereerst zij eraan herinnerd dat de raadgevende comités tegelijk met de goedkeuring van de sectorale richtlijnen door de Raad zijn ingesteld. Ze zijn allemaal volgens dezelfde regels samengesteld2. Elk comité bestaat uit 90 leden (45 gewone leden en 45 plaatsvervangers), ofwel zes deskundigen per lidstaten, te weten: twee deskundigen van de betrokken beroepsgroep, twee van de onderwijsinstellingen en twee van de bevoegde autoriteiten. De ambtstermijn van de leden van de comités beloopt drie jaar. Hoewel deze samenstelling nuttig en wenselijk leek ten tijde van de invoering van de eerste sectorale richtlijnen 29 jaar geleden, toen het er met name om ging de uitwisseling van informatie over de opleidingsmethoden en de inhoud en de structuur van het theoretische en praktische onderwijs in de lidstaten te bevorderen3, moet worden geconstateerd dat sommige bepalingen van de besluiten van de Raad houdende instelling van de raadgevende comités thans achterhaald zijn. In dit verband zij er ook aan herinnerd dat artikel 47 van het EG-Verdrag de Gemeenschap weliswaar een zekere bevoegdheid geeft op het gebied van opleiding - op grond waarvan overigens de richtlijnen inzake de erkenning van diploma’s en de coördinatie van opleidingen konden worden vastgesteld - maar dat in de artikelen 149 en 150 fundamentele verantwoordelijkheid voor de inhoud van het onderwijs en de opzet van het onderwijsstelsel bij de lidstaten berust. Er wordt uitdrukkelijk iedere mogelijkheid tot harmonisering van deze onderwijsstelsels uitgesloten, zoals de Raad bijvoorbeeld te kennen heeft gegeven in Besluit 94/819/EEG van 6 december 1994 tot vaststelling van het EG-Verdrag vastgelegd duidelijk van dat de is 1 2 3 COM(96)559 def. van 6. 11. 1996. Zie de besluiten van de Raad 75/364/EEG (artsen - PB L 167 van 30. 6. 1975), 77/454/EEG (verpleegkunde - PB L 176 van 15. 7. 1977), 78/688/EEG (tandartsen - PB L 233 van 21. 8. 1978), 78/1028/EEG (dierenartsen - PB L 362 van 23. 12. 1978), 80/156/EEG (verloskundigen - PB L 33 van 11. 2. 1980) en 85/434/EEG (apothekers - PB L 253 van 24. 9. 1985). Zie artikel 2, lid 2, van de in voetnoot 2 vermelde besluiten van de Raad. 2 een actieprogramma voor de ontwikkeling van een beleid van de Europese Gemeenschap inzake beroepsopleiding4. Bovendien is het aantal leden van de comités nagenoeg verdubbeld als gevolg van de uitbreidingen die sedert 1975 hebben plaatsgevonden. Deze situatie levert praktische moeilijkheden op, aangezien de Commissie niet over de nodige mankracht, materiële voorzieningen en financiële middelen beschikt om de werking van deze comités te verzekeren zoals deze aanvankelijk was voorzien. Bovendien gaat deze situatie ten koste van de doeltreffendheid van de vergaderingen en deze problemen zullen alleen maar verergeren bij nieuwe toetredingen. En tenslotte brengt het feit dat het comité om de drie jaar opnieuw moet worden benoemd, eveneens praktische problemen en een niet te verwaarlozen hoeveelheid werk mee. Deze nadelen zijn eveneens aan het licht gebracht door het SLIM-team dat belast is met de erkenning van diploma's. Derhalve overweegt de Commissie verschillende maatregelen met betrekking tot de zes raadgevende comités voor de opleiding die voor bepaalde beroepen in de gezondheidszorg bestaan5. Samenstelling De Commissie acht het beslist noodzakelijk om de omvang van de raadgevende comités terug te brengen door het aantal deskundigen in elk comité te verminderen. Opdat deze reorganisatie effect sorteert en het beoogde doel wordt bereikt, te weten een verbeterde werking van de onderhavige comités, overweegt de Commissie het aantal leden te beperken tot één lid per lidstaat, dat wil zeggen iemand uit het betrokken beroep. Aldus zou het totale aantal leden van de comités, bij de huidige samenstelling van de Europese Unie, teruggebracht worden tot 15 en dit aantal zou bij elke nieuwe toetreding slechts met één toenemen. Er zij evenwel opgemerkt dat de categorie van de deskundigen van de bevoegde autoriteiten reeds is vertegenwoordigd in het Comité van hooggeplaatste ambtenaren van in het Geneesmiddelencomité, volksgezondheid, ingesteld bij Besluit 75/320/EEG7, en in de ad hoc-werkgroep van hooggeplaatste ambtenaren voor de diergeneeskunde. ingesteld bij Besluit 75/365/EEG6, 4 5 6 7 comité PB L 340 van 29. 12. 1994. Zie voetnoot 2. Er bestaat nog een zevende raadgevend comité voor de opleiding, en wel op het gebied van de architectuur. Dit voorstel voor een richtlijn heeft thans evenwel niet betrekking op dit krachtens Richtlijn 85/384/EEG. De situatie van dit comité zal later worden onderzocht in het licht van de ontwikkelingen van dit voorstel. PB L 167 van 30. 6. 1975, blz. 19. PB L 147 van 9. 6. 1975, blz. 23. bevoegdheden bijzondere uitoefent vanwege het die de 3 Duur van de ambtstermijn De duur van de ambtstermijn bedraagt thans drie jaar maar de Commissie is er een voorstander van om deze te verlengen tot zes jaar. Dit lijkt te zijn gerechtvaardigd, niet alleen vanwege de praktische moeilijkheden die zich voordoen bij de hernieuwde benoeming van de comités, maar ook en vooral omdat, zoals het SLIM-team eveneens heeft onderstreept, de ervaring heeft geleerd dat de huidige termijn van drie jaar te kort is, aangezien de raadgevend comités er zelden in slagen hun werkzaamheden voor het einde van de ambtstermijn te voltooien. Wijze van benoeming Momenteel delen de lidstaten de lijst van hun deskundigen aan de Raad mede, die dan tot officiële benoeming moet overgaan. De Commissie is voornemens de wijze van benoeming van de deskundigen zo te vereenvoudigen dat de lidstaten hun kandidaten rechtstreeks aan haar kunnen voordragen. Aldus zou, mede door de vermindering van het aantal leden en de verlenging van de ambtstermijn, de benoeming van de leden van de raadgevende comités bij het ingaan van een nieuwe ambtstermijn aanmerkelijk minder rompslomp opleveren. Taak De Commissie stelt met voldoening vast dat de voornaamste doelen die aanvankelijk bij de instelling van de raadgevende comités voor de opleiding zijn gesteld, over het geheel genomen de onderwijsdoelstellingen en van de opleidingsniveaus en -stelsels kon een klimaat van vertrouwen worden geschapen, hetgeen een minimumvereiste is voor de onderlinge erkenning van diploma's. betere wederzijdse bereikt. Dankzij kennis zijn van een Bovendien hebben de betrokken beroepsgroepen zich over het algemeen op Europees niveau georganiseerd en gestructureerd, hetgeen eveneens de uitwisseling van informatie en standpunten inzake opleiding ten goede is gekomen. Voorts zijn er in de sectorale richtlijnen minimumopleidingseisen vastgelegd op basis van kwalitatieve en kwantitatieve criteria die voldoende zijn gebleken, zonder dat daarmee de eventuele noodzaak van aanpassingen wordt uitgesloten; deze eisen worden over het algemeen als aanvaardbaar beschouwd met het oog op de wederzijdse erkenning van diploma's. Derhalve dient de aard van het deskundig advies dat door de Commissie van de betrokken raadgevende comités kan worden verlangd, opnieuw te worden bezien. In dit verband wordt overwogen om de raadgevende comités voortaan te belasten met alle verzoeken om advies van de zijde van de Commissie inzake het vrije verkeer van de beroepsbeoefenaren die onder de verschillende sectorale richtlijnen vallen. Deze richtlijnen onderbouwen namelijk de interne markt en met name het vrije verkeer van personen. 4 Conclusie De maatregelen die de Commissie in 2000 officieel denkt goed te keuren ter invulling van deze beleidsrichtsnoeren, zullen een werkelijke vereenvoudiging van de besluitvorming zijn, aangezien de Commissie slechts één besluit hoeft te nemen voor de onderhavige zes raadgevende comités, in plaats van de zes besluiten van de Raad houdende benoeming van de comités, terwijl tevens de talrijke Raadsbesluiten bij vervanging van een lid van deze comités zouden komen te vervallen. En tenslotte zou het ook een echte administratieve vereenvoudiging zijn. Het betekent voor de lidstaten namelijk minder rompslomp wanneer zij om de zes jaar hun kandidaten moeten voordragen in plaats van om de drie jaar zes deskundigen, terwijl deze comités ook soepeler kunnen functioneren. De Raad wordt verzocht het bijgevoegde voorstel goed te keuren. 5 Voorstel voor een BESLUIT VAN DE RAAD tot intrekking van de Besluiten 75/364/EEG, 77/454/EEG, 78/688/EEG, 78/1028/EEG, 80/156/EEG en 85/434/EEG houdende instelling van raadgevende comités voor de opleiding tot verantwoordelijk algemeen ziekenverpleger, beoefenaar der tandheelkunde, dierenarts, verloskundige, apotheker en arts DE RAAD VAN DE EUROPESE UNIE, Gelet op het Verdrag tot oprichting van de Europese Gemeenschap, Gezien het voorstel van de Commissie, (1) Overwegende dat de Raad bij zijn Besluiten 75/364/EEG8, 77/454/EEG9, 78/688/EEG10, 78/1028/EEG11, 80/156/EEG12 en 85/434/EEG13 raadgevende comités voor de opleiding tot arts, verantwoordelijk algemeen ziekenverpleger, beoefenaar der tandheelkunde, dierenarts, verloskundige en apotheker heeft ingesteld; (2) Overwegende dat deze comités de hun bij deze besluiten opgelegde taak hebben volbracht; (3) Overwegende dat de werking van deze comités moet worden gerationaliseerd, zoals door de Commissie werd gesteld in haar Mededeling aan de Raad en het Europees Parlement over het SLIM-initiatief14, in haar Mededeling aan de Raad en het Europees Parlement over de tenuitvoerlegging van de aanbevelingen van het SLIM-team “erkenning van diploma's” en in haar toelichting bij het Voorstel voor een richtlijn van het Europees Parlement en de Raad tot wijziging van de Richtlijnen 89/48/EEG en 92/51/EEG betreffende het algemeen stelsel van erkenning van beroepskwalificaties en tot aanvulling van de Richtlijnen 78/1026/EEG, 78/686/EEG, 77/452/EEG, 78/1027/EEG, 85/432/EEG, 80/155/EEG, 85/433/EEG en 93/16/EEG betreffende de beroepen van verantwoordelijk algemeen dierenarts, verloskundige, architect, apotheker en arts 15; 78/687/EEG, 85/384/EEG, ziekenverpleger, tandheelkunde, 80/154/EEG, 77/453/EEG, beoefenaar der 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 PB L 167 van 30. 6. 1975. PB L 176 van 15. 7. 1977. PB L 233 van 21. 8. 1978. PB L 362 van 23. 12. 1978. PB L 33 van 11. 2. 1980. PB L 253 van 24. 9. 1985. COM(96)559 def. van 6. 11. 1996. COM(97)638 def. van 2. 12. 1997. 6 (4) Overwegende dat de Commissie in deze toelichting te kennen heeft gegeven dat zij, om deze rationalisering tot stand te brengen, het voornemen heeft zelf nieuwe raadgevende comités voor verantwoordelijk algemeen ziekenverplegers, beoefenaars der tandheelkunde, dierenartsen, verloskundigen, apothekers en artsen in te stellen; dat de ambtstermijn van de leden van deze nieuwe comités zes jaar zal bedragen; dat hun nieuwe taak alle aspecten van de sectorrichtlijnen zal omvatten die tot doel hebben het vrij verkeer van de betrokken beroepsgroepen en de wederzijdse erkenning van hun diploma's, certificaten en andere titels te bevorderen; dat de procedure voor de benoeming van de leden zal worden vereenvoudigd en dat het aantal leden zal worden beperkt tot één deskundige per lidstaat; (5) Overwegende dat deze maatregelen leiden tot een vereenvoudiging van de regelgeving en administratie; (6) Overwegende dat het wenselijk is de inwerkingtreding van dit besluit uit te stellen tot een datum die in de buurt ligt van de data waarop de verschillende bestaande tot 31 december 2000, waarbij het besluit van de Commissie tot benoeming van de nieuwe comités na deze datum van kracht zal worden; opnieuw moeten worden benoemd, namelijk comités (7) Overwegende dat de bij bovengenoemde besluiten van de Raad ingestelde comités dus tot 31 december 2000 in functie zullen blijven, BESLUIT: Artikel 1 De Besluiten 75/364/EEG, 77/454/EEG, 78/688/EEG, 78/1028/EEG, 80/156/EEG en 85/434/EEG worden ingetrokken. Dit besluit treedt in werking op 31 december 2000. Artikel 2 Artikel 3 Dit besluit is gericht tot de lidstaten. Gedaan te Brussel, op Voor de Raad De Voorzitter 7


title: Règlement (CE) n° 1555/1999 de la Commission, du 15 juillet 1999, portant fixation des restitutions à la production dans les secteurs des céréales et du riz

eurovoc_concepts:
cereals
potato
production refund
rice
starch

formats: pdf print

text: 16. 7. 1999 FR Journal officiel des Communaut(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes L 181/23 R(cid:221)GLEMENT (CE) No 1555/1999 DE LA COMMISSION du 15 juillet 1999 portant fixation des restitutions (cid:133) la production dans les secteurs des c(cid:130)r(cid:130)ales et du riz LA COMMISSION DES COMMUNAUT(cid:144)S EUROP(cid:144)ENNES, vu le trait(cid:130) instituant la Communaut(cid:130) europ(cid:130)enne, vu le r(cid:138)glement (CEE) no 1766/92 du Conseil, du 30 juin 1992, portant organisation commune des march(cid:130)s dans le secteur des c(cid:130)r(cid:130)ales (1), modifi(cid:130) en dernier lieu par le r(cid:138)glement (CE) no 1253/1999 (2), et notamment son article 7 paragraphe 3, vu le r(cid:138)glement (CE) no 3072/95 du Conseil, du 22 d(cid:130)cembre 1995, portant organisation commune du march(cid:130) du riz (3), modifi(cid:130) en dernier lieu par le r(cid:138)glement (CE) no 2072/98 (4), et notamment son article 7 paragraphe 2, vu le r(cid:138)glement (CEE) no 1722/93 de la Commission, du 30 juin 1993, d(cid:130)terminant les modalit(cid:130)s d’application relatives au r(cid:130)gime des restitutions (cid:133) la production dans les secteurs des c(cid:130)r(cid:130)ales et du riz (5), modifi(cid:130) en dernier lieu par le r(cid:138)glement (CE) no 87/1999 (6), et notamment son article 3, (1) consid(cid:130)rant que le r(cid:138)glement (CEE) no 1722/93 a d(cid:130)fini les conditions d’octroi de la restitution (cid:133) la production; que la base de calcul a (cid:130)t(cid:130) d(cid:130)termin(cid:130)e (cid:133) l’article 3 de ce r(cid:138)glement; que la restitution ainsi calcul(cid:130)e doit (cid:136)tre fix(cid:130)e une fois par mois et peut (cid:136)tre modifi(cid:130)e si les prix du ma(cid:139)s et/ou du bl(cid:130) changent d’une mani(cid:138)re significative; (2) (3) consid(cid:130)rant qu’il y a lieu d’affecter les restitutions (cid:133) la production (cid:133) fixer par le pr(cid:130)sent r(cid:138)glement des coeffi- cients indiqu(cid:130)s (cid:133) l’annexe II du r(cid:138)glement (CEE) no 1722/ 93 afin de d(cid:130)terminer le montant exact (cid:133) payer; consid(cid:130)rant que le comit(cid:130) de gestion des c(cid:130)r(cid:130)ales n’a pas (cid:130)mis d’avis dans le d(cid:130)lai imparti par son pr(cid:130)sident, A ARR(cid:219)T(cid:144) LE PR(cid:144)SENT R(cid:221)GLEMENT: Article premier La restitution (cid:133) la production, exprim(cid:130)e par tonne d’amidon de ma(cid:139)s, de bl(cid:130), d’orge, d’avoine, de f(cid:130)cule de pomme de terre, de riz ou de brisures de riz, vis(cid:130)e (cid:133) l’article 3, paragraphe 2, du r(cid:138)glement (CEE) no 1722/93 est fix(cid:130)e (cid:133) 63,42 EUR/t. Le pr(cid:130)sent r(cid:138)glement entre en vigueur le 16 juillet 1999. Article 2 Le pr(cid:130)sent r(cid:138)glement est obligatoire dans tous ses (cid:130)l(cid:130)ments et directement applicable dans tout (cid:144)tat membre. Fait (cid:133) Bruxelles, le 15 juillet 1999. Par la Commission Franz FISCHLER Membre de la Commission (1) JO L 181 du 1. 7. 1992, p. 21. (2) JO L 160 du 26. 6. 1999, p. 18. (3) JO L 329 du 30. 12. 1995, p. 18. (4) JO L 265 du 30. 9. 1998, p. 4. (5) JO L 159 du 1. 7. 1993, p. 112. (6) JO L 9 du 15. 1. 1999, p. 8


title: 1999/483/CE: Decisão da Comissão de 15 de Julho de 1999 que encerra o processo anti-dumping relativo às importações de fio de aço inoxidável, de diâmetro inferior a 1 mm, originário da República da Coreia [notificada com o número C(1999) 1876]

eurovoc_concepts:
South Korea
anti-dumping legislation
import
originating product
steel
wire

formats: html pdf print

text: L 189/50 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias 22. 7. 1999 II (Actos cuja publicação não é uma condição da sua aplicabilidade) COMISSÃO DECISÃO DA COMISSÃO de 15 de Julho de 1999 que encerra o processo anti-dumping relativo às importações de fio de aço inoxidável, de diâmetro inferior a 1 mm, originário da República da Coreia [notificada com o número C(1999) 1876] (1999/483/CE) A COMISSÃO DAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEIAS, Tendo em conta o Tratado que institui a Comunidade Europeia, Tendo em conta o Regulamento (CE) n. o 384/96 do Conselho, de 22 de Dezembro de 1995, relativo à defesa contra as importações objecto de dumping de países não membros da Comunidade Europeia (1), com a última redacção que lhe foi dada pelo Regulamento (CE) n. o 905/98 (2) e, nomeadamente, o n. o 3 do seu artigo 9. o, Após consulta do Comité Consultivo, Considerando: (1) (2) A. MEDIDAS PROVISÓRIAS Pelo Regulamento (CE) n. o 616/1999 (3) a Comissão instituiu um direito anti-dumping provisório sobre as importações de fio de aço inoxidável de diâmetro infe- rior a 1 mm (a seguir denominado «fio de aço») origi- nário da República da Coreia (a seguir denominada «Coreia»), classificado no código NC ex 7223 00 19; B. PROCESSO SUBSEQUENTE Na sequência da divulgação dos factos e considerações essenciais com base nos quais foi decidido instituir direitos provisórios sobre as importações de fio de aço inoxidável originário da Coreia (a seguir denominada «divulgação»), diversas partes interessadas apresentaram observações por escrito. Às partes que o solicitaram foi igualmente concedida uma audição; (1) JO L 56 de 6. 3. 1996, p. 1. (2) JO L 128 de 30. 4. 1998, p. 18. (3) JO L 79 de 24. 3. 1999, p. 1. (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) A Comissão continuou a reunir e a verificar todas as ìnformações que considerou necessárias para as suas conclusões definitivas; Todas as partes interessadas foram informadas dos factos e considerações essenciais com base nos quais a Comissão tencionava encerrar o presente processo. Foi- -lhes igualmente concedido um período para apresen- tarem observações na sequência da divulgação dos refe- ridos factos e considerações; Os comentários orais e escritos submetidos pelas partes interessadas foram examinados, e, sempre que adequado, as conclusões provisórias foram alteradas em conformi- dade; C. PRODUT0 EM CAUSA E PRODUTO SIMILAR O produto em causa é o fio de aço inoxidável fino, contendo, em peso, 2,5 % ou mais de níquel, com excepção do fio contendo, em peso, 28 % ou mais, mas não mais de 31 %, de níquel e 20 % ou mais, mas não mais de 22 %, de crómio; Durante a fase provisória do inquérito, foi. estabelecido que existem diferenças a nível das características físicas e das utilizações entre o fio de aço inoxidável abrangido pelo presente inquérito, isto é, o fio com um diâmetro igual ou superior a 1 mm (fio fino), por um lado, e o fio com um diâmetro igual ou superior a 1 mm (fio grosso), por outro. Pelos motivos expostos, verificou-se que no que se refere às suas aplicações, os fios finos e os grossos não são permutáveis entre si, ou são permutá- veis apenas em casos muito limitados. Todavia, no Regu- lamento (CE) n. o 616/1999 foi igualmente estabelecido que a questão de saber se é possível determinar uma linha divisória clara entre estes dois produtos seria apro- fundada na fase definitiva; 22. 7. 1999 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias L 189/51 (8) (9) (10) Com base nas informações facultadas pelas partes inte- ressadas, concluiu-se que o fio grosso e o fio fino são dois produtos diferentes, dado que apresentam caracte- rísticas físicas diferentes e são utilizados para aplicações diferentes. Em primeiro lugar, no que respeita às caracte- rísticas físicas, à tensão de rotura, à estrutura granular e ao revestimento, os fios finos e os fios grossos são diferentes. Em segundo lugar, no que respeita às várias aplicações dos dois produtos, verificou-se que o fio grosso é utilizado para aplicações de engenharia mais pesada, tais como, elementos de fixação, produtos de reforço de paredes, fios de soldadura, etc. e que, pelo contrário, o fio fino é geralmente utilizado para aplica- ções de precisão tais como telas e filtros (pano de fio tecido) com pequenas aberturas para filtrar partículas muito finas ou pequenas (por exemplo filtros de poeira e filtros químicos), e com aplicações medicinais/cirúrgicas, etc; Com base no que precede conclui-se que os fios finos e os grossos são dois produtos diferentes, com caracterís- ticas e aplicações diferentes e que não são permutáveis do ponto de vista dos utilizadores de fio de aço inoxi- dável; Perante o que precede e dado que as partes interessadas não apresentaram quaisquer argumentos no que respeita às conclusões provisórias da Comissão sobre o produto em causa e sobre as considerações respeitantes ao produto similar, os factos e conclusões enunciados nos considerandos 7 a 12 do Regulamento (CE) n. o 616/ /1999 são, por conseguinte, confirmados; D. DUMPING 1. Valor normal (11) Na sequência das observações apresentadas por um produtor exportador após a divulgação das conclusões, verificou-se que alguns dos custos tidos em conta para determinar o valor normal calculado deveriam ser repar- tidos de forma diferente. Com base na repartição revista, os valores normais para o produtor exportador em questão foram objecto de um novo cálculo; (12) As restantes conclusões enunciadas no considerando 13 do Regulamento (CE) n. o 616/1999 são confirmadas; 2. Preço de exportação (13) Um exportador produtor apontou um erro na resposta aos questionários em que certas transacções para expor- tação de fios grossos estavam incorrectamente decla- radas como vendas de fios finos. Perante as informações fornecidas, tal como solicitado, as transacções em causa não foram tidas em consideração para determinar o preço de exportação; (14) Dado que não foram apresentados outros argumentos no que respeita à determinação do preço de exportação, são confirmados o método enunciado nos conside- randos 14 a 16 do Regulamento (CE) n. o 616/1999, assim como todas as restantes conclusões neles enun- ciadas; 3. Comparação (15) Dado que não foram apresentados novos argumentos no que respeita aos ajustamentos efectuados tendo em vista uma comparação equitativa, são confirmadas as conclu- sões provisórias enunciadas nos considerandos 17 a 19 do Regulamento (CE) n. o 616/1999; 4. Margens de dumping (16) Dado que não foram apresentados novos argumentos respeitantes à determinação da margem de dumping é confirmado o método enunciado no considerando 20 do Regulamento (CE) n. o 616/1999. Nesta base, a compa- ração dos valores normais com os preços de exportação revelou a existência de uma margem de dumping limitada no que respeita a alguns produtores exportadores em causa. No entanto, a margem média ponderada nacional para todos os produtores exportadores objecto do inqué- rito que representam o volume total das exportações para a Comunidade originárias da Coreia expressa em percentagem do preço CIF fronteira comunitária é consi- derada de minimis, ou seja, inferior a 2 %. Nestas circuns- tâncias, a margem de dumping no que respeita à Coreia é considerada negligenciável em conformidade com o disposto no n. o 3 do artigo 9. o do Regulamento (CE) n. o 384/96; E. ACÇÃO PROPOSTA (17) À luz da conclusão anterior de que a margem de dumping média ponderada a nível nacional para as importações originárias da Coreia é considerada de minimis, deve ser encerrado o presente inquérito em conformidade com o n. o 3 do artigo 9. o do Regulamento (CE) n. o 384/96; (18) Em conformidade com o Regulamento (CE) n. o 616/ /1999, são liberados os montantes garantes do direito provisório, DECIDE: Artigo único 1. É encerrado o processo anti-dumping respeitante às importações de fio de aço inoxidável com um diâmetro igual ou inferior a 1 milímetro, contendo, em peso, 2,5 % ou mais de níquel, com exclusão do fio contendo, em peso, 28 % ou mais, mas não mais de 31 % de níquel e 20 % ou mais, mas não mais de 22 % de crómio, do código NC ex 7223 00 19 (código Taric 7223 00 19 10), originário da República da Coreia. São liberados os montantes garantes dos direitos provisó- 2. rios cobrados em conformidade com o Regulamento (CE) n. o 616/1999. Feito em Bruxelas, em 15 de Julho de 1999. Pela Comissão Leon BRITTAN Vice-Presidente


title: Regolamento (CE) n. 1553/1999 della Commissione, del 15 luglio 1999, che fissa le restituzioni applicabili all'esportazione dei prodotti trasformati a base di cereali e di riso

eurovoc_concepts:
cereal product
export refund
rice

text: 16. 7. 1999 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee L 181/19 REGOLAMENTO (CE) N. 1553/1999 DELLA COMMISSIONE del 15 luglio 1999 che fissa le restituzioni applicabili all’esportazione dei prodotti trasformati a base di cereali e di riso LA COMMISSIONE DELLE COMUNIT(cid:211) EUROPEE, visto il trattato che istituisce la Comunit(cid:133) europea, proteine, in materie grasse o in amido, tale contenuto essendo particolarmente indicativo della quantit(cid:133) di prodotti di base realmente incorporata nel prodotto trasformato; visto il regolamento (CEE) n. 1766/92 del Consiglio, del 30 giugno 1992, relativo all’organizzazione comune dei mercati nel settore dei cereali (1), modificato da ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 1253/1999 (2), in particolare l’articolo 13, paragrafo 3, visto il regolamento (CE) n. 3072/95 del Consiglio, del 22 dicembre 1995, comune del mercato del riso (3), modificato da ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 2072/98 (4), in particolare l’articolo 13, paragrafo 3, relativo all’organizzazione (1) (2) (3) considerando che ai sensi dell’articolo 13 del regola- mento (CEE) n. 1766/92 e dell’articolo 13 del regola- mento (CE) n. 3072/95 la differenza tra i corsi o i prezzi sul mercato mondiale dei prodotti di cui all’articolo 1 di detti regolamenti ed i prezzi di tali prodotti nella Comu- nit(cid:133) pu(cid:149) essere compensata mediante una restituzione all’esportazione; considerando che, in virt(cid:151) dell’articolo 13 del regola- mento (CE) n. 3072/95 le restituzioni devono essere fissate tenendo conto della situazione e della probabile evoluzione, da una parte, delle disponibilit(cid:133) di cereali, di riso e delle rotture di riso e dei loro prezzi sul mercato comunitario, e dall’altra dei prezzi dei cereali, del riso e delle rotture di riso e dei prodotti del settore cerealicolo sul mercato mondiale; che, in virt(cid:151) degli stessi articoli, occorre anche garantire ai mercati dei cereali e del riso una situazione equilibrata e uno sviluppo naturale dal punto di vista dei prezzi e degli scambi, e tener conto inoltre dell’aspetto economico delle esportazioni previste nonch(cid:130) dell’opportunit(cid:133) di evitare perturbazioni sul mercato comunitario; considerando che il regolamento (CE) n. 1518/95 della Commissione (5), modificato dal regolamento (CE) n. 2993/95 (6), relativo al regime di importazione e di esportazione dei prodotti trasformati a base di cereali e di riso, ha definito all’articolo 4 i criteri specifici su cui deve essere fondato il computo della restituzione per tali prodotti; (5) (6) (7) (8) considerando che per quanto riguarda le radici di manioca ed altre radici e tuberi tropicali, nonch(cid:130) le loro farine, l’aspetto economico delle esportazioni prevedibili non rende necessaria al momento attuale, tenendo conto della natura e dell’origine dei prodotti, la fissazione di una restituzione all’esportazione; che, per alcuni prodotti l’esiguit(cid:133) della partecipa- trasformati a base di cereali, zione della Comunit(cid:133) al commercio mondiale, non rende necessaria, attualmente, la fissazione di una resti- tuzione all’esportazione; considerando che la situazione del mercato mondiale o le esigenze specifiche di certi mercati possono rendere necessaria la differenziazione della restituzione per certi prodotti, a seconda della loro destinazione; considerando che la restituzione deve essere fissata una volta al mese e che pu(cid:149) essere modificata nel periodo intermedio; considerando che alcuni prodotti trasformati a base di granturco possono essere sottoposti ad un trattamento termico in seguito al quale la qualit(cid:133) del prodotto non corrisponde a quella ammessa a beneficiare di una resti- tuzione; che (cid:138) pertanto opportuno precisare che tali prodotti, contenenti amido pregelatinizzato, non sono ammessi a beneficiare di restituzioni all’esportazione; (9) considerando che il comitato di gestione per i cereali non ha emesso alcun parere nel termine fissato dal suo presidente, HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO: (4) considerando che (cid:138) opportuno graduare la restituzione da accordare in funzione del contenuto, secondo i prodotti, in ceneri, in cellulosa greggia, in involucri, in Articolo 1 (1) GU L 181 dell’1. 7. 1992, pag. 21. (2) GU L 160 del 26. 6. 1999, pag. 18. (3) GU L 329 del 30. 12. 1995, pag. 18. (4) GU L 265 del 30. 9. 1998, pag. 4. (5) GU L 147 del 30. 6. 1995, pag. 55. (6) GU L 312 del 23. 12. 1995, pag. 25. Le restituzioni all’esportazione per i prodotti di cui all’articolo 1, paragrafo 1, lettera d) del regolamento (CEE) n. 1766/92 e all’articolo 1, paragrafo 1, lettera c) del regolamento (CE) n. 3072/95, soggetti al regolamento (CE) n. 1518/95 sono fissate conformemente all’allegato del presente regolamento. L 181/20 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee 16. 7. 1999 Il presente regolamento entra in vigore il 16 luglio 1999. Articolo 2 Il presente regolamento (cid:138) obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri. Fatto a Bruxelles, il 15 luglio 1999. Per la Commissione Franz FISCHLER Membro della Commissione al regolamento della Commissione, del 15 luglio 1999, che fissa le restituzioni applicabili all’esportazione dei prodotti trasformati a base di cereali e di riso ALLEGATO (EUR/t) (EUR/t) Codice prodotto 1102 20 10 9200 (1) 1102 20 10 9400 (1) 1102 20 90 9200 (1) 1102 90 10 9100 1102 90 10 9900 1102 90 30 9100 1103 12 00 9100 1103 13 10 9100 (1) 1103 13 10 9300 (1) 1103 13 10 9500 (1) 1103 13 90 9100 (1) 1103 19 10 9000 1103 19 30 9100 1103 21 00 9000 1103 29 20 9000 1104 11 90 9100 1104 12 90 9100 1104 12 90 9300 1104 19 10 9000 1104 19 50 9110 1104 19 50 9130 1104 21 10 9100 1104 21 30 9100 1104 21 50 9100 1104 21 50 9300 1104 22 20 9100 1104 22 30 9100 Ammontare delle restituzioni 92,60 79,37 79,37 45,84 31,17 67,70 67,70 119,05 92,60 79,37 79,37 41,07 47,37 34,63 31,17 45,84 75,22 60,18 34,63 105,82 85,98 45,84 45,84 61,12 48,90 60,18 63,94 Codice prodotto 1104 23 10 9100 1104 23 10 9300 1104 29 11 9000 1104 29 51 9000 1104 29 55 9000 1104 30 10 9000 1104 30 90 9000 1107 10 11 9000 1107 10 91 9000 1108 11 00 9200 1108 11 00 9300 1108 12 00 9200 1108 12 00 9300 1108 13 00 9200 1108 13 00 9300 1108 19 10 9200 1108 19 10 9300 1109 00 00 9100 1702 30 51 9000 (2) 1702 30 59 9000 (2) 1702 30 91 9000 1702 30 99 9000 1702 40 90 9000 1702 90 50 9100 1702 90 50 9900 1702 90 75 9000 1702 90 79 9000 2106 90 55 9000 Ammontare delle restituzioni 99,21 76,06 34,63 33,95 33,95 8,49 16,54 60,43 54,40 67,90 67,90 105,82 105,82 105,82 105,82 48,64 48,64 0,00 121,41 92,95 121,41 92,95 92,95 121,41 92,95 127,22 88,30 92,95 (1) Non (cid:138) concessa alcuna restituzione ai prodotti sottoposti ad un trattamento termico che provoca una pregelatinizzazione dell’amido. (2) Le restituzioni sono concesse conformemente al regolamento (CEE) n. 2730/75 del Consiglio (GU L 281 dell’1. 11. 1975, pag. 20), modificato. NB: I codici prodotto e i relativi richiami 24. 12. 1987, pag. 1), modificato. in calce sono definiti dal regolamento (CEE) n. 3846/87 della Commissione (GU L 366 del


title: European Action for Multimedia Content : multimedia information demonstration and support network. volume I, MIDAS-NET profiles, participating organisations.

eurovoc_concepts:
dissemination of information
information industry
information technology
new technology
transmission network


title: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1548/1999 of 15 July 1999 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

eurovoc_concepts:
agri-monetary policy
citrus fruit
fruit vegetable
import price
pip fruit
stone fruit

text: 16. 7. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 181/1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1548/1999 of 15 July 1999 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, (2) Whereas, in compliance with the above criteria, the standard import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the Annex to this Regulation, Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the last import arrangements amended by Regulation (EC) No 1498/98 (2), and in particular Article 4 (1) thereof, fruit and vegetables (1), as for (1) Whereas Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multi- the criteria whereby the lateral Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in the Annex thereto; trade negotiations, HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regula- tion (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto. Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 July 1999. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, 15 July 1999. For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission (1) OJ L 337, 24. 12. 1994, p. 66. (2) OJ L 198, 15. 7. 1998, p. 4. L 181/2 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 7. 1999 to the Commission Regulation of 15 July 1999 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables ANNEX CN code 0707 00 05 0709 90 70 0805 30 10 0808 10 20, 0808 10 50, 0808 10 90 0808 20 50 0809 10 00 0809 20 95 0809 40 05 Third country code (1) Standard import value (EUR/100 kg) 052 628 999 052 999 382 388 524 528 999 388 400 508 512 524 528 804 999 388 512 528 804 999 052 064 999 052 061 068 400 616 999 064 624 999 61,9 130,8 96,4 54,3 54,3 55,9 69,0 44,8 69,0 59,7 82,5 61,1 84,6 67,6 55,7 45,4 100,7 71,1 100,4 69,0 57,3 72,3 74,8 145,6 69,2 107,4 181,0 155,0 90,6 213,6 170,0 162,0 83,2 258,0 170,6 (1) Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2317/97 (OJ L 321, 22. 11. 1997, p. 19). Code ‘999' stands for ‘of other origin'


title: Proposal for a Council Decision authorising Portugal to apply or to continue to apply reductions in, or exemptions from, excise duties on certain mineral oils used for specific purposes in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 8(4) of Directive, 92/81/EEC

eurovoc_concepts:
Portugal
environmental protection
mineral oil
tariff exemption
tariff reduction

formats: html pdf

text: COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 16. 07. 1999 COM(1999)369 final Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION authorising Portugal to apply or to continue to apply reductions in, or exemptions from, excise duties on certain mineral oils used for specific purposes, in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 8(4) of Directive 92/81/EEC (presented by the Commission) EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM Under Article 8(4) of Council Directive 92/81/EEC on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on mineral oils,1 the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, may authorise any Member State to introduce exemptions from, or reductions in, excise duties on grounds of specific policy considerations. The Portuguese authorities have informed the Commission that they wish to apply a different rate of excise duty on diesel fuel used by commercial vehicles (road haulage vehicles) as part of a plan to abolish the use of leaded petrol and simultaneously and gradually align the level of excise duty on diesel and unleaded petrol in order to narrow the gap between the duties charged. In accordance with the Directive, the other Member States have been informed of this request. The Directive provides for the Commission to review such exemptions and reductions periodically If the Commission considers that they may no longer be applied because they distort competition or the operation of the internal market or are incompatible with Community policy on protection of the environment, it is to present appropriate proposals to the Council. In any event, this derogation must be reviewed no later than 31 December 1999, when the authorisation granted by the Decision expires. The Council will review the situation on the basis of a Commission proposal and decide whether the authorisation should be withdrawn, amended or extended. 1 OJ L 316, 31. 10. 1992, p. 12 Directive as last amended by Directive 94/74/EC (OJ L 365, 31. 12. 1994, p. 46) 2 Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION authorising Portugal to apply or to continue to apply reductions in, or exemptions from, excise duties on certain mineral oils used for specific purposes, in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 8(4) of Directive 92/81/EEC THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 92/81/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on mineral oils2, and in particular Article 8(4) and (5) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, (1) Whereas, under Article 8(4) of Directive 92/81/EEC, the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, may authorise any Member State to introduce exemptions from, or reductions in, excise duties on mineral oils on grounds of specific policy considerations; (2) Whereas the Portuguese authorities have notified the Commission that they wish to apply to diesel fuel, from 1 July 1999, a different rate of excise duty on diesel fuel used by commercial vehicles (road haulage vehicles) as part of a plan to abolish the use of leaded petrol from 1 July 1999 and simultaneously and gradually align the level of excise duty on diesel and unleaded petrol in order to narrow the gap between the duties charged; (3) Whereas the other Member States have been informed thereof; (4) Whereas the Commission and all the application of differential rates is justified on environmental policy grounds and that it will not give rise to distortions of competition or hinder the operation of the internal market; the Member States accept that (5) Whereas the Commission regularly reviews reductions and exemptions to check that they are compatible with the operation of the internal market or with Community policy on protection of the environment; 2 OJ L 316, 31. 10. 1992, p. 12 Directive as last amended by Directive 94/74/EC (OJ L 365, 31. 12. 1994, p. 46) 3 (6) Whereas Portugal has requested authorisation to apply this different rate on diesel fuel from 1 July 1999; whereas the Council is to review its application on the basis of a report from the Commission no later than 31 December 1999, when the authorisation granted by this Decision expires, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Article 1 In accordance with Article 8(4) of Directive 92/81/EEC, Portugal is authorised from 1 July 1999 until 31 December 1999 to apply a different rate of excise duty on diesel fuel used by commercial vehicles provided that these differential rates are in accordance with the obligations laid down in Council Directive 92/82/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the approximation of the rates of excise duties on mineral oils,3 and in particular the minimum rates of excise duty provided for in Article 5 thereof. Article 2 This Decision is addressed to Portugal. Done at Brussels, For the Council The President 3 OJ L 316, 31. 10. 1992, p. 19 Directive as amended by Directive 94/74/EC (OJ L 365, 31. 12. 1994, p. 46) 4


title: Regolamento (CE) n. 1551/1999 della Commissione, del 15 luglio 1999, che fissa i tassi delle restituzioni applicabili a taluni prodotti dei settori dei cereali e del riso esportati sotto forma di merci non comprese nell'allegato I del trattato

eurovoc_concepts:
cereal product
cereals
export refund
rice

text: L 181/14 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee 16. 7. 1999 REGOLAMENTO (CE) N. 1551/1999 DELLA COMMISSIONE del 15 luglio 1999 che fissa i tassi delle restituzioni applicabili a taluni prodotti dei settori dei cereali e del riso esportati sotto forma di merci non comprese nell’allegato I del trattato LA COMMISSIONE DELLE COMUNIT(cid:211) EUROPEE, visto il trattato che istituisce la Comunit(cid:133) europea, visto il regolamento (CEE) n. 1766/92 del Consiglio, del 30 giugno 1992, relativo all’organizzazione comune dei mercati nel settore dei cereali (1), modificato da ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 1253/1999 (2), in particolare l’articolo 13, paragrafo 3, visto il regolamento (CE) n. 3072/95 del Consiglio, del 22 dicembre 1995, comune del mercato del riso (3), modificato dal regolamento (CE) n. 2072/ 98 (4), in particolare l’articolo 13, paragrafo 3, relativo all’organizzazione (1) (2) (3) (4) considerando che, a norma dell’articolo 13, paragrafo 1, del regolamento (CEE) n. 1766/92 e dell’articolo 13, paragrafo 1, del regolamento (CE) n. 3072/95, la diffe- renza tra i corsi o i prezzi sul mercato mondiale dei prodotti di cui all’articolo 1, di ciascuno di detti regola- menti ed i prezzi nella Comunit(cid:133) pu(cid:149) essere coperta da una restituzione all’esportazione; considerando che il regolamento (CE) n. 1222/94 della Commissione, del 30 maggio 1994, che stabilisce, per taluni prodotti esportati sotto forma di merci non comprese nell’allegato I del trattato, le modalit(cid:133) comuni d’applicazione relative alla concessione delle restituzioni all’esportazione loro importo (5), modificato da ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 1352/98 (6), ha specificato per quali di questi prodotti occorre fissare un tasso di restituzione applicabile all’e- sportazione sotto forma di merci che figurano, secondo il caso, nell’allegato B del regolamento (CEE) n. 1766/92 o nell’allegato B del regolamento (CE) n. 3072/95; criteri per stabilire ed i il considerando che, conformemente all’articolo 4, para- grafo 1, primo comma, del regolamento (CE) n. 1222/ 94, il tasso della restituzione per 100 kg di ciascuno dei prodotti di base considerati deve essere fissato per ciascun mese; considerando che gli impegni presi in materia di restitu- zione applicabili all’esportazione di prodotti agricoli in merci non comprese nell’allegato I del incorporati trattato possono essere messi in pericolo qualora si stabiliscano tassi delle restituzioni elevati; che (cid:138) oppor- tuno pertanto adottare provvedimenti di salvaguardia in (1) GU L 181 dell’1. 7. 1992, pag. 21. (2) GU L 160 del 26. 6. 1999, pag. 18. (3) GU L 329 del 30. 12. 1995, pag. 18. (4) GU L 265 del 30. 9. 1998, pag. 4. (5) GU L 136 del 31. 5. 1994, pag. 5. (6) GU L 184 del 27. 6. 1998, pag. 25. (5) (6) queste situazioni senza tuttavia impedire la conclusione di contratti a lungo termine; che la fissazione di un tasso di restituzione specifico per la fissazione in anticipo delle restituzioni costituisce un provvedimento che consente di conseguire questi obiettivi; considerando che, a seguito dell’intesa tra la Comunit(cid:133) europea e gli Stati Uniti d’America sulle esportazioni di paste alimentari dalla Comunit(cid:133) verso gli Stati Uniti, approvata dalla decisione 87/482/CEE del Consiglio (7), si rende necessario differenziare la restituzione per le merci dei codici NC 1902 11 00 e 1902 19 secondo la loro destinazione; considerando che, conformemente all’articolo 4, para- lettera b), del regolamento (CE) n. 1222/94, grafo 5, quando la prova prevista all’articolo 4, paragrafo 5, lettera a), del suddetto regolamento non (cid:138) apportata, bisogna fissare un tasso di restituzione all’esportazione ridotto, tenuto conto dell’importo della restituzione alla produzione applicabile, in virt(cid:151) del regolamento (CEE) n. 1722/93 della Commissione (8), modificato da ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 87/1999 (9), al prodotto di base utilizzato, valido durante il periodo presunto di fabbrica- zione delle merci; (7) considerando che il comitato di gestione per i cereali non ha emesso alcun parere nel termine fissato dal suo presidente, HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO: Articolo 1 I tassi delle restituzioni applicabili ai prodotti di base che figurano nell’allegato A del regolamento (CE) n. 1222/94 e indicati nell’articolo 1 del regolamento (CEE) n. 1766/92 o nell’articolo 1, paragrafo 1, del regolamento (CE) n. 3072/95 modificato, esportati sotto forma di merci che figurano rispetti- vamente nell’allegato B del regolamento (CEE) n. 1766/92 e nell’allegato B del regolamento (CE) n. 3072/95 sono fissati come indicato in allegato. Articolo 2 Il presente regolamento entra in vigore il 16 luglio 1999. (7) GU L 275 del 29. 9. 1987, pag. 36. (8) GU L 159 dell’1. 7. 1993, pag. 112. (9) GU L 9 del 15. 1. 1999, pag. 8. 16. 7. 1999 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee L 181/15 Il presente regolamento (cid:138) obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri. Fatto a Bruxelles, il 15 luglio 1999. Per la Commissione Karel VAN MIERT Membro della Commissione L 181/16 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee 16. 7. 1999 al regolamento della Commissione, del 15 luglio 1999, che fissa i tassi delle restituzioni applicabili a taluni prodotti del settore dei cereali e del riso esportati sotto forma di merci non comprese nell’allegato I del trattato ALLEGATO Codice NC Designazione dei prodotti (1) 1001 10 00 Frumento (grano) duro: – all’esportazione delle merci dei codici NC 1902 11 e 1902 19 verso gli Stati Uniti d’America – negli altri casi 1001 90 99 Frumento (grano) tenero e frumento segalato: – all’esportazione delle merci di codici NC 1902 11 e 1902 19 verso gli Stati Uniti d’America – negli altri casi: – – conformemente n. 1222/94 (2) – – negli altri casi 1002 00 00 Segala 1003 00 90 Orzo 1004 00 00 Avena all’articolo 4, paragrafo 5, del regolamento (CE) 1005 90 00 all’articolo Granturco utilizzato sotto forma di: – amido – – conformemente n. 1222/94 (2) – – negli altri casi – glucosio, sciroppo di glucosio, maltodestrina, sciroppo di maltodestrina dei codici NC 1702 30 51, 1702 30 59, 1702 30 91, 1702 30 99, 1702 40 90, 1702 90 50, 1702 90 75, 1702 90 79, 2106 90 55 (3): regolamento paragrafo (CE) del 5, 4, all’articolo – – conformemente n. 1222/94 (2) – – negli altri casi – altre (incluso allo stato naturale) 4, paragrafo 5, del regolamento (CE) Fecola di patate del codice NC 1108 13 00 assimilata ad un prodotto ottenuto dalla trasformazione del granturco: – conformemente all’articolo n. 1222/94 (2) – negli altri casi regolamento paragrafo (CE) del 5, 4, ex 1006 30 Riso lavorato: – a grani tondi – a grani medi – a grani lunghi 1006 40 00 Rotture di riso 1007 00 90 Sorgo (EUR/100 kg) Tasso della restituzione per 100 kg di prodotto di base In caso di fissazione in anticipo delle restituzioni — — Altri — — 2,207 2,207 0,564 3,395 4,107 3,056 3,761 3,075 6,614 2,270 5,809 6,614 3,075 6,614 7,400 7,400 7,400 3,200 3,056 0,564 3,395 4,107 3,056 3,761 3,075 6,614 2,270 5,809 6,614 3,075 6,614 7,400 7,400 7,400 3,200 3,056 (1) Riguardo ai prodotti agricoli risultanti dalla trasformazione del prodotto di base o assimilati, bisogna utilizzare i coefficienti figuranti all’allegato E del regolamento (CE) n. 1222/94 della Commissione (GU L 136 del 31. 5. 1994, pag. 5), modificato. (2) Le merci (3) Per gli sciroppi dei codici NC 1702 30 99, 1702 40 90 e 1702 60 90, ottenuti mescolando gli sciroppi di glucosio e fruttosio, solamente lo sciroppo di glucosio ha diritto in questione sono indicate all’allegato I del regolamento (CEE) n. 1722/93 della Commissione (GU L 159 del 1. 7. 1993, pag. 112), modificato. alla restituzione all’esportazione


title: Κανονισμός (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1551/1999 της Επιτροπής, της 15ης Ιουλίου 1999, για καθορισμό των ποσοστών των επιστροφών που εφαρμόζονται σε ορισμένα προϊόντα των τομέων των σιτηρών και της όρυζας που εξάγονται υπό μορφή εμπορευμάτων που δεν υπάγονται στο παράρτημα Ι της συνθήκης

text: L 181/14 EL Ep(cid:148)sglg Evgleq(cid:148)da tym Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:150)m Joimot(cid:147)tym 16. 7. 1999 JAMOMISLOS (EJ) aqih. 1551/1999 TGS EPITQOPGS tgr 15gr Iouk(cid:148)ou 1999 cia jahoqisl(cid:149) tym posost(cid:150)m tym epistqov(cid:150)m pou evaql(cid:149)fomtai se oqisl(cid:146)ma pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mta tym tol(cid:146)ym tym sitgq(cid:150)m jai tgr (cid:149)qufar pou en(cid:145)comtai up(cid:149) loqv(cid:147) elpoqeul(cid:145)tym pou dem up(cid:145)comtai sto paq(cid:145)qtgla I tgr sumh(cid:147)jgr G EPITQOPG TYM EUQYPA(cid:136)JYM JOIMOTGTYM, (cid:130)womtar up(cid:149)xg: tg sumh(cid:147)jg cia tgm (cid:148)dqusg tgr Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:147)r Joim(cid:149)tgtar, tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EOJ) aqih. 1766/92 tou Sulbouk(cid:148)ou, tgr 30(cid:147)r Ioum(cid:148)ou 1992, peq(cid:148) joim(cid:147)r oqcam(cid:150)seyr acoq(cid:145)r stom tol(cid:146)a tym sitgq(cid:150)m (1), (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi(cid:147)hgje tekeuta(cid:148)a ap(cid:149) tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 1253/1999 (2), jai id(cid:148)yr to (cid:145)qhqo 13 paq(cid:145)cqavor 3, tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 3072/95 tou Sulbouk(cid:148)ou, tgr 22ar Dejelbq(cid:148)ou 1995, peq(cid:148) joim(cid:147)r oqcam(cid:150)seyr acoq(cid:145)r tgr (cid:149)qufar (3), (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi(cid:147)hgje ap(cid:149) tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 2072/98 (4), jai id(cid:148)yr to (cid:145)qhqo 13 paq(cid:145)cqavor 3, Ejtil(cid:150)mtar: (5) (6) (1) (2) (3) (4) (cid:149)ti, s(cid:151)lvyma le to (cid:145)qhqo 13 paq(cid:145)cqavor 1 tou jamomi- slo(cid:151) (EOJ) aqih. 1766/92 jai to (cid:145)qhqo 13 paq(cid:145)cqavor 1 tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 3072/95, g diavoq(cid:145) letan(cid:151) tym til(cid:150)m stgm pacj(cid:149)slia acoq(cid:145) tym pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mtym pou pqobk(cid:146)- pomtai sto (cid:145)qhqo 1 jahem(cid:149)r ap(cid:149) tour d(cid:151)o auto(cid:151)r jamomi- slo(cid:151)r jai tym til(cid:150)m stgm Joim(cid:149)tgta lpoqe(cid:148) ma jakuvhe(cid:148) ap(cid:149) epistqov(cid:147) jat(cid:145) tgm enacyc(cid:147)· (cid:149)ti o jamomisl(cid:149)r (EJ) aqih. 1222/94 tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r, tgr 30(cid:147)r La(cid:155)ou 1994, peq(cid:148) hesp(cid:148)seyr, cia oqisl(cid:146)ma ceyqcij(cid:145) pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mta pou en(cid:145)comtai up(cid:149) loqv(cid:147) elpoqeul(cid:145)tym ta opo(cid:148)a dem up(cid:145)comtai sto paq(cid:145)qtgla I tgr sumh(cid:147)jgr, tym joim(cid:150)m keptoleqei(cid:150)m evaqloc(cid:147)r tym swetij(cid:150)m le tgm paqow(cid:147) tym epistqov(cid:150)m jat(cid:145) tgm enacyc(cid:147) jai tym jqitgq(cid:148)ym jahoqi- slo(cid:151) tou poso(cid:151) tour (5), (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi(cid:147)hgje tekeuta(cid:148)a ap(cid:149) tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 1352/98 (6), (cid:146)wei eneidije(cid:151)sei eje(cid:148)ma ta pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mta cia ta opo(cid:148)a sumtq(cid:146)wei k(cid:149)cor ma jahoqi- she(cid:148) posost(cid:149) epistqov(cid:147)r, pou evaql(cid:149)fetai jat(cid:145) tgm enacyc(cid:147) tour up(cid:149) loqv(cid:147) elpoqeul(cid:145)tym ta opo(cid:148)a jatomo- l(cid:145)fomtai, jat(cid:145) tgm peq(cid:148)ptysg, sto paq(cid:145)qtgla B tou jamo- mislo(cid:151) (EOJ) aqih. 1766/92 (cid:147) sto paq(cid:145)qtgla B tou jamo- mislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 3072/95· (cid:149)ti, s(cid:151)lvyma le to (cid:145)qhqo 4 paq(cid:145)cqavor 1 pq(cid:150)to ed(cid:145)vio tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 1222/94, to posost(cid:149) tgr epi- stqov(cid:147)r am(cid:145) 100 wiki(cid:149)cqalla jahem(cid:149)r ap(cid:149) ta pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mta b(cid:145)seyr pq(cid:146)pei ma jahoqishe(cid:148) cia j(cid:145)he l(cid:147)ma· (cid:149)ti oi desle(cid:151)seir pou amakalb(cid:145)momtai swetij(cid:145) le tir epi- stqov(cid:146)r pou lpoqo(cid:151)m ma woqgco(cid:151)mtai jat(cid:145) tgm enacyc(cid:147) ceyqcij(cid:150)m pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mtym emsylatyl(cid:146)mym se elpoqe(cid:151)lata lg upac(cid:149)lema sto paq(cid:145)qtgla I tgr sumh(cid:147)jgr emd(cid:146)wetai ma apeikgho(cid:151)m ap(cid:149) tom pqojahoqisl(cid:149) uxgk(cid:150)m pos(cid:150)m epi- (1) EE L 181 tgr 1. 7. 1992, s. 21. (2) EE L 160 tgr 26. 6. 1999, s. 18. (3) EE L 329 tgr 30. 12. 1995, s. 18. (4) EE L 265 tgr 30. 9. 1998, s. 4. (5) EE L 136 tgr 31. 5. 1994, s. 5. (6) EE L 184 tgr 27. 6. 1998, s. 25. stqov(cid:147)r· (cid:149)ti sj(cid:149)pilo e(cid:148)mai, sumep(cid:150)r, ma kalb(cid:145)momtai se t(cid:146)toier peqipt(cid:150)seir l(cid:146)tqa diav(cid:151)kangr wyq(cid:148)r yst(cid:149)so ma elpod(cid:148)fetai g s(cid:151)maxg lajqopq(cid:149)heslym sulb(cid:145)seym· (cid:149)ti o jahoqisl(cid:149)r em(cid:149)r eidijo(cid:151) poso(cid:151) epitqov(cid:147)r cia tom pqojaho- qisl(cid:149) epistqov(cid:150)m e(cid:148)mai (cid:146)ma l(cid:146)tqo pou epitq(cid:146)pei tgm ep(cid:148)- teung tym diav(cid:149)qym aut(cid:150)m st(cid:149)wym· (cid:149)ti, (cid:151)steqa ap(cid:149) to diajamomisl(cid:149) am(cid:145)lesa stgm Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:147) Joim(cid:149)tgta jai tir Gmyl(cid:146)mer Pokite(cid:148)er tgr Aleqij(cid:147)r swetij(cid:145) le tir enacyc(cid:146)r fulaqij(cid:150)m ap(cid:149) tgm Joim(cid:149)tgta stir Gmyl(cid:146)- mer Pokite(cid:148)er, pou ecjq(cid:148)hgje le tgm ap(cid:149)vasg 87/482/EOJ tou Sulbouk(cid:148)ou (7), e(cid:148)mai amacja(cid:148)o ma diavoqopoigho(cid:151)m oi epistqov(cid:146)r cia ta elpoqe(cid:151)lata pou up(cid:145)comtai stour jydi- jo(cid:151)r SO 1902 11 00 jai 1902 19 am(cid:145)koca le tom pqoo- qisl(cid:149) tour· (cid:149)ti, s(cid:151)lvyma le to (cid:145)qhqo 4 paq(cid:145)cqavor 5 stoiwe(cid:148)o b) tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 1222/94, (cid:149)tam dem pqosjol(cid:148)fetai g ap(cid:149)deing cia tgm opo(cid:148)a o k(cid:149)cor sto (cid:145)qhqo 4 paq(cid:145)cqavor 5 stoiwe(cid:148)o a) tou (cid:148)diou yr (cid:145)my jamomislo(cid:151), e(cid:148)mai sj(cid:149)pilo ma jahoq(cid:148)fetai leiyl(cid:146)mo (cid:151)xor epistqov(cid:147)r jat(cid:145) tgm enacyc(cid:147), le sumejt(cid:148)lgsg tou poso(cid:151) tgr epistqov(cid:147)r jat(cid:145) tgm paqacyc(cid:147) pou evaql(cid:149)fetai, dum(cid:145)lei tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EOJ) aqih. 1722/93 tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r (8), (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi- (cid:147)hgje tekeuta(cid:148)a ap(cid:149) tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 87/1999 (9), cia to basij(cid:149) pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)m to opo(cid:148)o wqgsilopoi(cid:147)hgje, jai pou isw(cid:151)ei cia to wqomij(cid:149) di(cid:145)stgla jat(cid:145) to opo(cid:148)o heyqe(cid:148)tai (cid:149)ti paq(cid:147)whgsam ta elpoqe(cid:151)lata, (7) (cid:149)ti g epitqop(cid:147) diawe(cid:148)qisgr sitgq(cid:150)m dem diat(cid:151)pyse cm(cid:150)lg stgm pqohesl(cid:148)a pou (cid:149)qise o pq(cid:149)edq(cid:149)r tgr, ENEDYSE TOM PAQOMTA JAMOMISLO: (cid:129)qhqo 1 Ta posost(cid:145) epistqov(cid:150)m pou evaql(cid:149)fomtai sta pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mta b(cid:145)seyr pou elva(cid:148)momtai sto paq(cid:145)qtgla A tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 1222/94 jai pou pqobk(cid:146)pomtai sto (cid:145)qhqo 1 tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EOJ) aqih. 1766/92 (cid:147) sto (cid:145)qhqo 1 paq(cid:145)cqavor 1 tou tqopo- poigl(cid:146)mou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 3072/95, ta opo(cid:148)a en(cid:145)comtai up(cid:149) loqv(cid:147) pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mtym pou jatomol(cid:145)fomtai amt(cid:148)stoiwa sto paq(cid:145)qtgla B tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EOJ) aqih. 1766/92 (cid:147) sto paq(cid:145)qtgla B tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 3072/95, jahoq(cid:148)fomtai (cid:149)pyr upodeijm(cid:151)etai sto paq(cid:145)qtgla tou paq(cid:149)mtor jamomislo(cid:151). (cid:129)qhqo 2 O paq(cid:150)m jamomisl(cid:149)r aqw(cid:148)fei ma isw(cid:151)ei stir 16 Iouk(cid:148)ou 1999. (7) EE L 275 tgr 29. 9. 1987, s. 36. (8) EE L 159 tgr 1. 7. 1993, s. 112. (9) EE L 9 tgr 15. 1. 1999, s. 8. 16. 7. 1999 EL Ep(cid:148)sglg Evgleq(cid:148)da tym Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:150)m Joimot(cid:147)tym L 181/15 O paq(cid:150)m jamomisl(cid:149)r e(cid:148)mai desleutij(cid:149)r yr pqor (cid:149)ka ta l(cid:146)qg tou jai isw(cid:151)ei (cid:145)lesa se j(cid:145)he jq(cid:145)tor l(cid:146)kor. Bqun(cid:146)kker, 15 Iouk(cid:148)ou 1999. Cia tgm Epitqop(cid:147) Karel VAN MIERT L(cid:146)kor tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r L 181/16 EL Ep(cid:148)sglg Evgleq(cid:148)da tym Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:150)m Joimot(cid:147)tym 16. 7. 1999 PAQAQTGLA tou jamomislo(cid:151) tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r, tgr 15(cid:147)r Iouk(cid:148)ou 1999, cia jahoqisl(cid:149) tym posost(cid:150)m tym epistqov(cid:150)m pou evaql(cid:149)fom- tai se oqisl(cid:146)ma pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mta tym tol(cid:146)ym tym sitgq(cid:150)m jai tgr (cid:149)qufar pou en(cid:145)comtai up(cid:149) loqv(cid:147) elpoqeul(cid:145)tym pou dem up(cid:145)comtai sto paq(cid:145)qtgla I tgr sumh(cid:147)jgr Jydij(cid:149)r SO Peqicqav(cid:147) elpoqeul(cid:145)tym (1) (EUR/100 kg) Pos(cid:149)tgta epistqov(cid:150)m am(cid:145) 100 kg tym pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mtym b(cid:145)seyr Se peqipt(cid:150)seir pqojahoqislo(cid:151) Koip(cid:146)r 1001 10 00 Sit(cid:145)qi sjkgq(cid:149): – se peq(cid:148)ptysg enacyc(cid:147)r pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mtym tym jydij(cid:150)m SO 1902 11 jai 1902 19, pqor tir Gmyl(cid:146)mer Pokite(cid:148)er tgr Aleqij(cid:147)r – cia tir up(cid:149)koiper peqipt(cid:150)seir — — — — 1001 90 99 Sit(cid:145)qi lakaj(cid:149) jai silicd(cid:145)ki: – se peq(cid:148)ptysg enacyc(cid:147)r pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mtym tym jydij(cid:150)m SO 1902 11 jai 1902 19, pqor tir Gmyl(cid:146)mer Pokite(cid:148)er tgr Aleqij(cid:147)r 2,207 2,207 – cia tir up(cid:149)koiper peqipt(cid:150)seir: – – se peq(cid:148)ptysg evaqloc(cid:147)r tou (cid:145)qhqou 4 paq(cid:145)cqavor 5 stoiwe(cid:148)o b) tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 1222/94 (2) – – cia tir up(cid:149)koiper peqipt(cid:150)seir 1002 00 00 S(cid:148)jakg 1003 00 90 Jqih(cid:145)qi 1004 00 00 Bq(cid:150)lg 1005 90 00 Jakalp(cid:149)ji pou wqgsilopoi(cid:147)hgje se loqv(cid:147): – al(cid:151)kym: – – se peq(cid:148)ptysg evaqloc(cid:147)r tou (cid:145)qhqou 4 paq(cid:145)cqavor 5 stoiwe(cid:148)o b) tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 1222/94 (2) – – cia tir up(cid:149)koiper peqipt(cid:150)seir – ckuj(cid:149)fg, jai siqopio(cid:151) ckuj(cid:149)fgr, laktodentq(cid:148)mgr jai siqopio(cid:151) laktodentq(cid:148)mgr tym 1702 40 90, jydij(cid:150)m 1702 90 50, 1702 90 75, 1702 90 79, 2106 90 55 (3): 1702 30 99, 1702 30 91, 1702 30 51, 1702 30 59, – – se peq(cid:148)ptysg evaqloc(cid:147)r tou (cid:145)qhqou 4 paq(cid:145)cqavor 5 stoiwe(cid:148)o b) tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 1222/94 (2) – – cia tir up(cid:149)koiper peqipt(cid:150)seir – (cid:145)kker loqv(cid:146)r (jai yr (cid:146)wei) (cid:129)luko ceyl(cid:147)kym tou jydijo(cid:151) SO 1108 13 00 enoloi(cid:150)momtai l’ (cid:146)ma pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)m to opo(cid:148)o pqo(cid:146)qwetai ap(cid:149) tg letapo(cid:148)gsg tou aqabos(cid:148)tou: – se peq(cid:148)ptysg evaqloc(cid:147)r tou (cid:145)qhqou 4 paq(cid:145)cqavor 5 stoiwe(cid:148)o b) tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) ex 1006 30 aqih. 1222/94 (2) – cia tir up(cid:149)koiper peqipt(cid:150)seir Q(cid:151)fi keujasl(cid:146)mo: – se stqoccuko(cid:151)r j(cid:149)jjour – se l(cid:146)tqiour j(cid:149)jjour – se lajqe(cid:148)r j(cid:149)jjour 1006 40 00 Q(cid:151)fi se hqa(cid:151)slata 1007 00 90 S(cid:149)qco 0,564 3,395 4,107 3,056 3,761 3,075 6,614 2,270 5,809 6,614 3,075 6,614 7,400 7,400 7,400 3,200 3,056 0,564 3,395 4,107 3,056 3,761 3,075 6,614 2,270 5,809 6,614 3,075 6,614 7,400 7,400 7,400 3,200 3,056 (1) (cid:133)som avoq(cid:145) ta ceyqcij(cid:145) pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mta pou pqo(cid:146)qwomtai ap(cid:149) tg letapo(cid:148)gsg tou basijo(cid:151) pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mtor (cid:147)/jai eje(cid:148)ma ta opo(cid:148)a enoloio(cid:151)mtai pqor aut(cid:145), evaql(cid:149)fomtai oi sumtekest(cid:146)r pou paqat(cid:148)hemtai sto paq(cid:145)qtgla E tou tqopopoigl(cid:146)mou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 1222/94 tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r (EE L 136 tgr 31. 5. 1994, s 5). (2) Ta pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mta cia ta opo(cid:148)a c(cid:148)metai k(cid:149)cor amav(cid:146)qomtai sto paq(cid:145)qtgla I tou tqopopoigl(cid:146)mou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 1722/93 tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r (EE L 159 tgr 1. 7. 1993, s. 112). (3) (cid:133)som avoq(cid:145) ta siq(cid:149)pia pou up(cid:145)comtai stour jydijo(cid:151)r SO 1702 30 99, 1702 40 90 jai 1702 60 90 ta opo(cid:148)a (cid:146)woum jatasjeuaste(cid:148) ap(cid:149) le(cid:148)clata tym siqopi(cid:150)m ckuj(cid:149)fgr jai vqoujt(cid:149)fgr d(cid:148)mei dija(cid:148)yla epistqov(cid:147)r jat(cid:145) tgm enacyc(cid:147)


title: Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1555/1999 der Kommission vom 15. Juli 1999 zur Festsetzung der Produktionserstattungen für Getreide und Reis

text: 16. 7. 1999 DE Amtsblatt der Europ(cid:132)ischen Gemeinschaften L 181/23 VERORDNUNG (EG) Nr. 1555/1999 DER KOMMISSION vom 15. Juli 1999 zur Festsetzung der Produktionserstattungen f(cid:129)r Getreide und Reis DIE KOMMISSION DER EUROP(cid:142)ISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — gest(cid:129)tzt auf den Vertrag zur Gr(cid:129)ndung der Europ(cid:132)ischen Gemeinschaft, gest(cid:129)tzt auf die Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1766/92 des Rates vom 30. Juni 1992 (cid:129)ber die gemeinsame Marktorganisation f(cid:129)r Getreide (1), zuletzt ge(cid:132)ndert durch die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1253/1999 (2), insbesondere auf Artikel 7 Absatz 3, gest(cid:129)tzt auf die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 3072/95 des Rates vom 22. Dezember 1995 (cid:129)ber die gemeinsame Marktorganisation f(cid:129)r Reis (3), zuletzt ge(cid:132)ndert durch die Verordnung (EG) Nr. insbesondere auf Artikel 7 Absatz 2, 2072/98 (4), gest(cid:129)tzt auf die Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1722/93 der Kommis- sion vom 30. Juni 1993 mit Durchf(cid:129)hrungsbestimmungen zu der Regelung der Produktionserstattungen f(cid:129)r Getreide und Reis (5), zuletzt ge(cid:132)ndert durch die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 87/ 1999 (6), insbesondere auf Artikel 3, in Erw(cid:132)gung nachstehender Gr(cid:129)nde: (1) Mit der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1722/93 sind die Bedin- gungen f(cid:129)r die Gew(cid:132)hrung der Produktionserstattung festgelegt worden. Die diesbez(cid:129)gliche Berechnungs- grundlage in Artikel 3 derselben Verordnung enthalten. Die so berechnete Erstattung muß einmal im ist Monat festgesetzt werden und kann ge(cid:132)ndert werden, wenn sich der Mais- und/oder der Weizenpreis erheblich (cid:132)ndern. Um den zu zahlenden Betrag genau zu bestimmen, sind die mit dieser Verordnung festzusetzenden Produktions- erstattungen durch die im Anhang II der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1722/93 angegebenen Koeffizienten anzu- passen. Der Verwaltungsausschuß f(cid:129)r Getreide hat nicht inner- halb der ihm von seinem Vorsitzenden gesetzten Frist Stellung genommen — (2) (3) HAT FOLGENDE VERORDNUNG ERLASSEN: Artikel 1 Die in Artikel 3 Absatz 2 der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1722/93 genannte Erstattung je Tonne Mais-, Weizen-, Gerste-, Hafer-, Kartoffel-, Reis- oder Bruchreisst(cid:132)rke wird auf 63,42 EUR/t festgesetzt. Diese Verordnung tritt am 16. Juli 1999 in Kraft. Artikel 2 Diese Verordnung ist in allen ihren Teilen verbindlich und gilt unmittelbar in jedem Mitglied- staat. Br(cid:129)ssel, den 15. Juli 1999 F(cid:129)r die Kommission Franz FISCHLER Mitglied der Kommission (1) ABl. L 181 vom 1. 7. 1992, S. 21. (2) ABl. L 160 vom 26. 6. 1999, S. 18. (3) ABl. L 329 vom 30. 12. 1995, S. 18. (4) ABl. L 265 vom 30. 9. 1998, S. 4. (5) ABl. L 159 vom 1. 7. 1993, S. 112. (6) ABl. L 9 vom 15. 1. 1999, S. 8


title: Proposal for a Council Decision on the procedure for attesting the conformity of construction products pursuant to Article 20(2) of Council Directive 89/106/EEC as regards flat glass, profiled glass and glass block products

eurovoc_concepts:
building materials
building safety
glass
harmonisation of standards
safety standard

text: COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 15. 07. 1999 COM(1999) 314 final Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the procedure for attesting the conformity of construction products pursuant to Article 20(2) of Council Directive 89/106/EEC as regards flat glass, profiled glass and glass block products (presented by the Commission) EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM Summary 1. Council Directive 89/106/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to construction products, seeks to abolish those obstacles to the free movement of goods which are caused by the disparity of national product standards, technical approvals or other technical specifications and provisions that reflect safety and other requirements important in the public interest that are subject to national laws, regulations or administrative provisions. 2. To this end, the Directive provides, inter alia, that the Commission is to prepare mandates which form the basis for CEN/CENELEC to elaborate harmonised standards. The conformity of the products with these harmonised standards gives these products the presumption of fitness for their intended use. 3. The attestation of the conformity of the products with harmonised standards (or other harmonised specifications) is established following several alternative procedures. According to Article 13(4), the choice of the procedure for the attestation of conformity for a given product or family of products is specified by the Commission after consultation of the Standing Committee referred to in Article 19(1). More specifically, the procedure for the attestation of conformity is laid down in a decision in the sense of Article 249 of the EC Treaty, whereby Article 20 of the Directive 89/106/EEC has to be followed. 4. When establishing its decision proposals, the Commission follows the specific technical criteria related to in Article 13(4) of the Directive and takes into account the principle of the least onerous possible procedure consistent with safety referred to in the same article, as well as the general principle of proportionality. 5. Due to its complexity, which causes delays in implementation, and the burden that the attestation procedures could impose on manufacturers, the Directive was part of the first SLIM initiative which concluded that both the acceleration of its implementation and the improvement/simplification of the Directive itself were needed. For the same reason the Commission, whilst strictly applying the criteria referred to above, pays special attention to all operational aspects of the procedures required for the attestation of conformity, whose cost could sometimes result in significant alterations in competition conditions on the market, generally to the prejudice of SMEs. 6. Bearing all this in mind, on 2 December 1997, the Commission presented to the Standing Committee on Construction a draft for a decision on the attestation of conformity concerning six families of glass products. In the presence of all Member States, 53 votes were delivered against the draft and 34 for the draft of the Commission. The minutes of some representatives voted against the draft because a more stringent procedure for the attestation of conformity should have been chosen for product group 5/6 (in short: insulating glass units). As the measures envisaged by the Commission are not in the relevant meeting show that 2 accordance with the opinion of the committee, the Commission is now submitting the proposal to the Council according to Article 20(2) of Directive 89/106/EEC. I. Introduction In the framework of the Construction Products Directive (CPD), the availability of harmonised standards is a more important element for the functioning of the internal market than in other new approach directives. In the case of the CPD as it is now, harmonised technical specifications (standards or European technical approvals) are de facto compulsory, as direct conformity with the essential requirements is excluded as an alternative route to CE Marking, for the simple reason that no essential requirements are defined by the directive at the level of construction products. In this case, the second important element for the operation of a new approach directive on the market, the attestation of conformity, necessarily refers to the available technical specifications, instead of to the essential requirements themselves. For this reason and because of the great variety of products and products families, the Directive does not foresee a specific procedure for the attestation of conformity. it gives the Commission the power to decide on the procedure to be Instead, applied for a given product or the Standing Committee set up in Article 19. This is carried out following the criteria provided for in Article 13 of the Directive. family of products, after consultation of Following the same Article 13, in each case, the least onerous possible procedure consistent with safety shall be chosen. In addition, the Commission takes account as far as possible of the principles of simplification and efficiency referred to in the SLIM initiative, as well as of the general principle of proportionality. It appears that for the family of insulating glass units, the Standing Committee referred to above, does not share the Commission’s opinion on these aspects, and thus the measures envisaged are not in accordance with the opinion that the Standing Committee delivered on 2 December 1997. II. Procedural aspects in relation to the draft from the Commission to the Standing Committee in relation to the attestation of conformity for flat glass, profiled glass and glass blocks (a) The decision within the system of the Directive 89/106/EEC Directive 89/106/EEC foresees, inter alia, that the Commission prepares mandates which form the basis for CEN/CENELEC to elaborate harmonised standards. Furthermore, the Commission has to elaborate a draft for a decision which fixes in which manner a construction product is to be tested in order to allow attestation of the fact that the product is in conformity with the requirements of the harmonised norm. There are two procedures for the attestation of conformity to be chosen from: either 3 the manufacturer controls via its own factory production control1, or an approved body is additionally involved in the assessment and surveillance (Article 13(3)). In each case the least onerous procedure consistent with safety shall be chosen (penultimate paragraph of Article 13(4). The criteria listed in Article 13(4) will help in the decision making process. The procedure for the attestation of conformity is laid down in a decision in the sense of Article 249 of the EC Treaty, whereby Article 20 of Directive 89/106/EEC has to be followed. Therefore, the Commission submits a draft to the Standing Committee which has to deliver an opinion with the majority laid down in Article 205(2) of the EC Treaty. The Committee is a regulatory Committee according to procedure III of the Council decision of 13 July 1987 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission2. (b) Opinion of the Standing Committee on the draft of the Commission On 2 December 1997 the Commission presented the said draft for a decision to the Standing Committee. In the presence of all Member States, 53 votes were delivered against the draft and 34 for the draft of the Commission3. The minutes of the relevant meeting shows that some representatives voted against the draft because a more stringent procedure for the attestation of conformity should have been chosen for product group 5/6 (in short: insulating glass units). As the measures envisaged by the Commission are not in accordance with the opinion of the committee, the Commission is now submitting the proposal to the Council according to Article 20(2) of Directive 89/106/EEC. III. Material aspects in relation to the proposal from the Commission to the Council with regard to the procedure of attestation of conformity for flat glass, profiled glass and glass blocks (a) The proposed procedures of attestation of conformity Annex I and II of the Directive reflect in a general way the procedures of attestation of conformity. The final choice is laid down in Annex III which fixes for each product in its end-use the procedure of attestation of conformity which is to be applied. 1 2 3 Directive 89/106/EEC defines in Annex III. 1 the factory production control as a permanent internal control of production exercised by the manufacturer. All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the manufacturer shall be documented in a systematic manner in the form of written policies and procedures. This production control system documentation shall ensure a common understanding of quality assurance and enable the achievement of the required product characteristics and the effective operation of the production control system to be checked. OJ L 197, 18. 7. 1987, p. 33. Belgium, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Portugal and Finland voted against the draft of the Commission. Denmark, Greece, Ireland, the Netherlands, Austria, Sweden and the United Kingdom voted for the draft of the Commission. 4 1. The least onerous procedure4 The least onerous procedure has been chosen for three end uses. Either the product falls under: (1) (2) (3) 2. fire class A according to decision 96/603/EC of the Commission5, or under fire classes D,E,F of decision 94/611/EC of the Commission6 (Product family 2/6). The proposal thereby follows the classifications taken in the above mentioned decisions; or the decision of the Commission which will be taken in the area of external fire performance analogous to Decision 96/603/EC (product family 3/6); or all end-uses not explicitly listed in the decision (product family 6/6). The additional involvement of an approved body7 The additional involvement of an approved laboratory in order to execute an initial type test has been chosen for the following products: (1) (2) (3) (4) 3. products which fall under fire classes A,B,C of decision 94/611/EC of the Commission (product family 2/6). Thereby, the Commission follows the classification used in the abovementioned Decision; or products for uses which are subject to external fire performance regulations. (product family 3/6). Thereby, the Commission follows the decision which will be taken in the area of external fire performance analogous to Decision 96/603/EC; or products which serve as safety glass (product family 4/6); or products which serve as insulating glass (product family 5/6). Additional involvement of an approved body with increased testing and surveillance responsibilities8 For justified exceptional cases a system has been chosen which requires the involvement of an approved certification body not only for the initial type test of the product but also for an initial inspection of the factory, an initial inspection of the factory production control of the producer and continuous surveillance, assessment and approval of the factory production control. This financially and logistically intensive procedure for the producer is foreseen for products which: 4 5 6 7 8 This procedure corresponds to the system as described in Annex III. 2(ii), Third possibility of Directive 89/106/EEC and is illustrated in the proposal by the digit 4. Decision 96/603/EC of the Commission establishing the list of products belonging to Classes A “no contribution to fire”, OJ L 267, 19. 10. 1996. Decision 94/611/EC of the Commission implementing Article 20 of Directive 89/106/EEC on construction products, OJ L 241, 16. 9. 1994, the so-called “Euroclass decision” in relation to fire. This procedure corresponds to the system as described in Annex III. 2(ii), Second possibility of Directive 89/106/EEC and is illustrated in the proposal by the digit 3. This procedure corresponds to the system as described in Annex III. 2(i) without audit testing of samples of Directive 89/106/EEC and is illustrated in the proposal by the digit 1. 5 (1) (2) (b) serve for fire resistance and compartmentation (product family 1/6); or serve as anti-bullet, or anti-explosion glazing (product family 4/6). The procedure of attestation of conformity for insulating glass The proposal of the Commission takes into account the SLIM initiative and is based on the legal grounds of the EC Treaty and Directive 89/106/EEC. As the Commission has to choose the least onerous procedure consistent with safety, it must follow the principle of proportionality. Therefore, the procedure must not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objectives. The attestation of conformity by the producer himself has to be given priority. This fundamental principle has only to be left aside if it is imperative for reasons of safety. The principle of proportionality for the procedure of attestation of conformity in the case of Directive 89/106/EEC has to be assessed against the question of whether the chosen procedure can secure those characteristics of a construction product which a construction works needs in order to fulfil the essential requirements in the sense of Directive 89/106/EEC. Insulating glass has the task to enable the construction works to fulfil the essential requirements “Protection against noise” and “Energy economy and heat retention”. Protection against noise is laid down in Annex I point 5 of Directive 89/106/EEC as follows: The construction works must be designed and built in such a way that noise perceived by the occupants or people nearby is kept down to a level that will not threaten their health and will allow them so sleep, rest and work in satisfactory conditions. In order to fulfil “Energy economy and heat Directive 89/106/EEC foresees that retention” Annex I point 6 of The construction works and its heating, cooling and ventilation installations must be designed and built in such a way that the amount of energy required in use shall be low, having regard to the climatic conditions of the locations and the occupants. The satisfaction of the essential requirements is assured by a number of interrelated measures, in particular the planning and design of the works, the execution of the works and necessary maintenance as well as the properties, performances and use of the construction products9. One of these products could be insulating glass. Insulation glass units help to reduce direct airborne sound10 and the energy needs of construction works. To these ends several characteristics will need to be tested as laid down in a thermal properties and harmonised standard: direct airborne sound insulation, radiation properties11. 9 Communication of Council Directive 89/106/EEC, p. 140 and 153 of OJ C 62, 28. 2. 1994. op. cit. p. 145. the Commission with regard to the 10 11 CONSTRUCT 97/221 Rev 1, Mandate to CEN/CENELEC concerning the execution of standardisation work for harmonised standards on flat glass, profiled glass and glass blocks. Interpretative Documents of 6 With regard to the production process of insulating glass it needs to be explained that sheets of glass units are assembled which contain either air or inert gases between them and/or have a special coating. Important aspects in the production of multi-layered glass units are the sealing and a complete surface treatment in the case of coating. Faults in the design or in the fabrication lead to a reduced technical capacity of the product which has negative repercussions on the fulfilment of the essential requirements as described above. The importance of the product “insulating glass” as one of several possibilities to fulfil the essential requirements “noise reduction” and “energy economy and heat retention” in the construction works, is to be regarded as notable yet not essential. This also means that the effect of the variability of the products characteristics on its serviceability with regard to the fulfilment of the essential requirements is medium to low. However, the production process does bear the possibility of defects. A poor sealing will leave a simple multiple-glazing. A coating which has not been applied in full or which becomes patchy, is less effective in reducing the energy needs of the construction works. In order to contain these risks, the Commission proposes to have the design and production parameters tested with a prototype by an independent test laboratory. The producer will then have to follow the test results of the initial type test with his own production control system. restriction of An even greater appears disproportionate, particularly as the product characteristics to be tested (direct thermal and radiation properties) have no safety airborne sound insulation, implications. In addition, Member States could not bring forward any convincing and striking arguments which would have refuted the proportionality of the proposal. the producer of insulation glass In general it has to be noted that the principle of proportionality is not always followed by the majority of representatives of the Member States in the administrative committee. Neither the EC Treaty and the explicit provision in article 13(4) of Directive 89/106/EEC, nor the efforts of the Commission to elaborate a legislation which is convinced the majority of for manufacturers, representatives in the administrative committee to find a legally objective and acceptable result. In the case in question, the Member States even asked for a degree of involvement of a third party that does not exist in their own national legal order. The law of the European Community is thus being misused in order to introduce more stringent rules for market participants. the least onerous With such behaviour, the objectives of Directive 89/106/EEC are constantly undermined, which is neither acceptable in a legal nor an economic sense. The tendency to foresee more stringent, and thereby more expensive procedures for the attestation of products via a systematic involvement of a third party is not covered by the text of the Directive and does not correspond to the approach of the European Community in order to fulfil the Internal Market in the EC; furthermore, it does not in any way reduce production costs and thereby improve competitiveness. 7 Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the procedure for attesting the conformity of construction products pursuant to Article 20(2) of Council Directive 89/106/EEC as regards flat glass, profiled glass and glass block products (Text with EEA relevance) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 89/106/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the regulations and administrative provisions of the approximation of products12, Member States to by amended Directive 93/68/EEC13, and in particular Article 13(4) thereof, construction relating laws, as Having regard to the proposal from the Commission14, Whereas: (1) The Commission is required to select, as between the two procedures under Article 13(3) of Directive 89/106/EEC for attesting the conformity of a product, the 'least onerous possible procedure consistent with safety'. This means that it is necessary to decide whether, for a given product or family of products, the existence of a factory production control system under the responsibility of the manufacturer is a necessary and sufficient condition for an attestation of conformity, or whether, for reasons related to compliance with the criteria mentioned in Article 13(4), the intervention of an approved certification body is therefore required. (2) Article 13(4) requires that the procedure thus determined must be indicated in the mandates and in the technical specifications; therefore, it is desirable to define the concept of products or family of products as used in the mandates and in the technical specifications. (3) The two procedures provided for in Article 13(3) are described in detail in Annex III to Directive 89/106/EEC: it is necessary therefore to specify clearly the methods by which the two procedures must be implemented, by reference to 12 OJ L 40, 11. 2. 1989, p. 12. 13 OJ L 220, 30. 8. 1993, p. 1. 14 OJ C 8 Annex III, for each product or family of products, since Annex III gives preference to certain systems. (4) The procedure referred to in point (a) of Article 13(3) corresponds to the systems set out in the first possibility, without continuous surveillance, and the second and third possibilities of point (ii) of Section 2 of Annex III, and the procedure referred to in point (b) of Article 13(3) corresponds to the systems set out in point (i) of Section 2 of Annex III, and in the first possibility, with continuous surveillance, of point (ii) of Section 2 of Annex III. (5) The measures provided for in this Regulation are not in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Construction, HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 The products and families of products set out in Annex I shall have their conformity attested by a procedure whereby the manufacturer has under its sole responsibility a factory production control system ensuring that the product is in conformity with the relevant technical specifications. Article 2 The products set out in Annex II shall have their conformity attested by a procedure in addition to a factory production control system operated by the whereby, manufacturer, an approved certification body is involved in assessment and surveillance of the production control or of the product itself. Article 3 The procedure for attesting conformity as set out in Annex III shall be indicated in mandates for harmonised standards. This Decision is addressed to the Member States. Article 4 Done at Brussels, For the Council The President 9 ANNEX I Flat and curved glass panels (including basic glass, processed glass, special or safety glass, coated, filmed, enamelled, surface treated or mirrored glass): For all uses other than: - for use in a glazed assembly intended specifically to provide fire resistance; - for use as anti-bullet or anti-explosion glazing. Channel-shaped glass (wired or unwired): For all uses other than: - for use in a glazed assembly intended specifically to provide fire resistance. Insulating glass units: For all uses other than: - for use in a glazed assembly intended specifically to provide fire resistance; - for use as anti-bullet or anti-explosion glazing. Glass blocks For use in non-load bearing applications other than: - for anti-bullet and anti-explosion uses. Glass block wall panels: For all non-load bearing uses other than: - for fire compartmentation uses; - for anti-bullet and anti-explosion uses. 10 ANNEX II Flat and curved glass panels (including basic glass, processed glass, special or safety glass, coated, filmed, enamelled, surface treated or mirrored glass): For anti-bullet and anti-explosion uses; For use in a glazed assembly intended specifically to provide fire resistance. Channel-shaped glass (wired or unwired): For use in a glazed assembly intended specifically to provide fire resistance. Insulating glass units: For anti-bullet and anti-explosion uses; For use in a glazed assembly intended specifically to provide fire resistance. Glass blocks For anti-bullet and anti-explosion uses. Glass block wall panels: For fire compartmentation uses; For anti-bullet and anti-explosion uses. 11 ANNEX III Note: For products having more than one of the intended uses specified in the following families, the tasks for the approved body, derived from the relevant systems of attestation of conformity, are cumulative. Product family: flat glass, profiled glass and glass block products (1/6) Systems of attestation of conformity For the product(s) and intended use(s) listed below, CEN/CENELEC are requested to specify the following system(s) of attestation of conformity in the relevant harmonised standard(s): Product(s) Intended use(s) Level(s) or class(es) (fire resistance) Attestation of conformity system(s) Flat or curved glass panels Channel-shaped glass Insulating glass units Glass block wall panels For use in a glazed assembly intended specifically to provide fire resistance For fire compartmentation any any 1 1 System 1: See Directive 89/106/EEC, Annex III. 2. (i), without audit-testing of samples. it can be implemented The specification for the system should be such that even where performance does not need to be determined for a certain characteristic, because at least one Member State has no legal requirement at all for such characteristic [see Article 2(1) of Directive 89/106/EEC and, where applicable, clause 1. 2. 3 of the Interpretative Documents]. In those cases the verification of such a characteristic must not be imposed on the manufacturer if he does not wish to declare the performance of the product in that respect. 12 Product family: flat glass, profiled glass and glass block products (2/6) Systems of attestation of conformity For the product(s) and intended use(s) listed below, CEN/CENELEC are requested to specify the following system(s) of attestation of conformity in the relevant harmonised standard(s): Product(s) Intended use(s) Level(s) or class(es) reaction to fire Attestation of conformity system(s) Flat or curved glass panels Channel-shaped glass Insulating glass units Glass blocks Glass block wall panels for uses subject to reaction to fire regulations A, B, C ----- A*, D, E, F 3 ------ 4 System 3: See Directive 89/106/EEC, Annex III. 2. (ii), Second possibility. System 4: See Directive 89/106/EEC, Annex III. 2. (ii), Third possibility. * Materials of class A that according to the Decision 96/603/EC do not require to be tested for reaction to fire. The specification for the system should be such that it can be implemented even where performance does not need to be determined for a certain characteristic, because at least one Member State has no legal requirement at all for such characteristic [see Article 2(1) of Directive 89/106/EEC and, where applicable, clause 1. 2. 3 of the Interpretative Documents]. In those cases the verification of such a characteristic must not be imposed on the manufacturer if he does not wish to declare the performance of the product in that respect. 13 Product family: flat glass, profiled glass and glass block products (3/6) Systems of attestation of conformity For the product(s) and intended use(s) listed below, CEN/CENELEC are requested to specify the following system(s) of attestation of conformity in the relevant harmonised standard(s): Product(s) Intended use(s) Level(s) or class(es) Attestation of conformity system(s) Flat or curved glass panels Channel-shaped glass Insulating glass units For uses subject to external fire performance regulations products requiring testing 3 -------- 4 ---------- products “deemed to satisfy” without testing * System 3: See Directive 89/106/EEC, Annex III. 2. (ii), Second possibility. System 4: See Directive 89/106/EEC, Annex III. 2. (ii), Third possibility. * to be confirmed in discussions with the Fire Regulators Group. The specification for the system should be such that it can be implemented even where performance does not need to be determined for a certain characteristic, because at least one Member State has no legal requirement at all for such characteristic [see Article 2(1) of Directive 89/106/EEC and, where applicable, clause 1. 2. 3 of the Interpretative Documents]. In those cases the verification of such a characteristic must not be imposed on the manufacturer if he does not wish to declare the performance of the product in that respect. 14 Product family: flat glass, profiled glass and glass block products (4/6) Systems of attestation of conformity For the product(s) and intended use(s) listed below, CEN/CENELEC are requested to specify the following system(s) of attestation of conformity in the relevant harmonised standard(s): Product(s) Intended use(s) Flat or curved glass panels Insulating glass units for use as anti- bullet, or anti- explosion glazing Level(s) or class(es) Attestation of conformity system(s) - 1 Glass blocks Glass block wall panels Channel-shaped glass ---------------------- ------------ ------------ for other uses liable to present “safety-in-use” risks and subject to such regulations for uses liable to present “safety-in- use” risks and subject to such regulations - - 3 3 System 1: See Directive 89/106/EEC, Annex III. 2. (i), without audit-testing of samples. System 3: See Directive 89/106/EEC, Annex III. 2. (ii), Second possibility. The specification for the system should be such that it can be implemented even where performance does not need to be determined for a certain characteristic, least one Member State has no legal requirement at all for such because at characteristic [see Article 2(1) of Directive 89/106/EEC and, where applicable, clause 1. 2. 3 of the Interpretative Documents]. In those cases the verification of such a characteristic must not be imposed on the manufacturer if he does not wish to declare the performance of the product in that respect. 15 Product family: flat glass, profiled glass and glass block products (5/6) Systems of attestation of conformity For the product(s) and intended use(s) listed below, CEN/CENELEC are requested to specify the following system(s) of attestation of conformity in the relevant harmonised standard(s): Product(s) Intended use(s) Flat or curved glass panels (specially treated) Channel-shaped glass Insulating glass units Glass blocks Glass block wall panels for uses relating to energy conservation and / or noise reduction Level(s) or class(es) Attestation of conformity system(s) - 3 System 3: See Directive 89/106/EEC, Annex III. 2. (ii), Second possibility. it can be implemented The specification for the system should be such that even where performance does not need to be determined for a certain characteristic, because at least one Member State has no legal requirement at all for such characteristic [see Article 2(1) of Directive 89/106/EEC and, where applicable, clause 1. 2. 3 of the Interpretative Documents]. In those cases the verification of such a characteristic must not be imposed on the manufacturer if he does not wish to declare the performance of the product in that respect. 16 Product family: flat glass, profiled glass and glass block products (6/6) Systems of attestation of conformity For the product(s) and intended use(s) listed below, CEN/CENELEC are requested to specify the following system(s) of attestation of conformity in the relevant harmonised standard(s): Product(s) Intended use(s) Flat or curved glass panels Channel-shaped glass Insulating glass units Glass blocks Glass block wall panels for uses other than those specified in families (1/6) to (5/6) Level(s) or class(es) Attestation of conformity system(s) - 4 System 4: See Directive 89/106/EEC, Annex III. 2. (ii), Third possibility. The specification for the system should be such that it can be implemented even where performance does not need to be determined for a certain characteristic, because at least one Member State has no legal requirement at all for such characteristic [see Article 2(1) of Directive 89/106/EEC and, where applicable, clause 1. 2. 3 of the Interpretative Documents]. In those cases the verification of such a characteristic must not be imposed on the manufacturer if he does not wish to declare the performance of the product in that respect. 17