title: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1750/1999 of 23 July 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 on support for rural development from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF)

eurovoc_concepts:
EAGGF Guarantee Section
EAGGF Guidance Section
State aid
aid to agriculture
regional aid
rural development

text: 13. 8. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 214/31 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1750/1999 of 23 July 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 on support for rural development from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Com- munity, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 of 17 May 1999 on support for rural development from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and amending and repealing certain Regulations (1) and in particular Articles 34 and 50 thereof, (1) Whereas Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 has established a single legal framework for support from EAGGF for rural development, defining, in particular, in its Title II, measures for support, their objectives, and the criteria for eligibility; whereas this framework applies to rural development support all over the Community; (2) Whereas detailed rules should be adopted to complete this framework; whereas the rules should follow the principle of subsidiarity and should therefore be limited to those rules needing to be adopted at Community level; (3) Whereas detailed rules defining the eligibility criteria for the different rural development measures should take into account experience gained from existing instruments as applied under the various Council regulations which have been repealed according to Article 55 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999; (4) Whereas, as regards support for investment in agricultural holdings and in processing plants as well as for support for young farmers, Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 lays down three basic conditions; whereas the time at which those conditions have to be fulfilled should be defined, including the time for the demonstration of the economic viability of an agricultural holding applying for an invest- ment aid, which should be based on an assessment of the prospects of that holding; (5) Whereas, as regards investments in holdings and in processing plants, Community support is subject to the condition that normal market outlets for the products concerned can be found; whereas rules should be estab- lished for the assessment of such market outlets; (1) OJ L 160, 26. 6. 1999, p. 80. (6) Whereas support for vocational extend to normal agricultural and forestry education; training should not (7) Whereas conditions for early retirement support should be based on the experience acquired under the support scheme established by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2079/92 (2) as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2773/95 (3), (8) Whereas, in particular, specific problems arising from the transfer of a holding by several transferors, and from the transfer of a holding by a tenant farmer have to be solved; (9) Whereas in less favoured areas, in relation to areas used by several farmers in common, compensatory allowances should be available to each farmer using those areas, regard being had to the degree to which he is entitled to such use; (10) Whereas detailed rules for agri-environment support should be based on the experience acquired under the support scheme established by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 of 30 June 1992 (4), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2772/95 (5), and should in particular take into account existing rules established by Commission Regulation (EC) No 746/96 (6), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 435/97 (7). (11) Whereas the definition of the minimum conditions to be observed by farmers in connection with the various agri-environment undertakings should ensure balanced application of agri-environment support taking into account its objectives and thus contributing to a sustain- able rural development; (12) Whereas the selection criteria for investment aimed at improving the processing and marketing of agricultural products should be defined; whereas in view of the experience acquired in the existing support scheme, set up by Council Regulation (EC) No 951/97(8), these selection criteria should be based or general principles rather than sectorial rules; (2) OJ L 215, 30. 7. 1992, p. 91. (3) OJ L 288, 1. 12. 1995, p. 37. (4) OJ L 215, 30. 7. 1992, p. 85. (5) OJ L 288, 1. 12. 1995, p. 35. (6) OJ L 102, 25. 4. 1996, p. 19. (7) OJ L 67, 7. 3. 1997, p. 2. (8) OJ L 142, 2. 6. 1997, p. 22. L 214/32 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 13. 8. 1999 (13) Whereas it is appropriate to derogate from the provision contained in the second indent of Article 28(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 which excludes support in the processing and marketing of for investment products from third countries in the outermost regions of the Community, whereas that derogation should nonetheless be subject to certain conditions; (21) Whereas, in order to facilitate the establishment of rural development plans and their examination and approval by the Commission, common rules should be determined for the structure and the contents of those plans on the basis of the requirements set out in particular in Article 43 of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999; (14) Whereas certain forests which are excluded from support for forestry under Article 29(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 should be further defined; (15) Whereas detailed conditions should be laid down for support granted for the afforestation of agricultural land and for payments granted for activities to maintain and improve the ecological stability of forests, (16) Whereas according to Article 33 of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999, support is granted for other measures relating to farming activities and their conversion and to rural activities, provided that they do not fall within the scope of any other rural development measure; whereas, given the large variety of measures which could fall under this Article, it appears appropriate to leave the definition of conditions for support in the first place to Member States as part of their programming; (17) Whereas rules common to several measures should be established, assuring in particular a common standard of good farming practice, where measures refer to this criterion, and guaranteeing such flexibility for long term undertakings as is needed to take account of events which could affect those commitments, but without jeopardising the effective implementation of the various support measures; (18) Whereas a clear line of demarcation should be drawn between financing rural development support and finan- cing support under common market organisations; whereas any exceptions to the principle that measures falling within the scope of support schemes under common market organisations should not be eligible for rural development support should be proposed by Member States in the framework of rural development programming, according to their specific need and following a transparent procedure; (19) Whereas payments made in pursuance of rural develop- ment support should be made in full to the beneficiaries; (22) Whereas conditions for amendments of rural develop- ment programming documents should be established in order to allow an effective and speedy examination by the Commission of such amendments; (23) Whereas only those amendments which contain important changes to rural development programming documents should be subject to the management com- mittee procedure; whereas other amendments should be decided by Member States and communicated to the Commission; (24) Whereas detailed provisions should be established as to financial planning and as to participation in financing for those measures which are financed by the EAGGF Guarantee Section according to Article 35(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999; (25) Whereas, in this connection, Member States should report regularly to the Commission on the state of financing of rural development measures; (26) Whereas measures have to be taken to ensure the effective spending of funds reserved for rural develop- ment support, provision being made in particular for an initial advance payment and for the necessary adjustment of allocations according to needs and to past perform- ance; (27) Whereas the general rules concerning budgetary disci- pline, and in particular those relating to incomplete or incorrect declarations on the part of Member States, should apply in addition to the specific rules established by this Regulation; (28) Whereas details of financial administration of rural development measures will be governed by the rules adopted for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (1); (29) Whereas procedures and requirements for monitoring and evaluation should be established on the basis of principles applicable to other Community support measures, in particular those applying to Structural Funds as laid down by Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Fund (2); (20) Whereas detailed rules should be established for the rural development plans and their presentation of revision; (1) OJ L 160, 26. 6. 1999, p. 103. (2) OJ L 161, 26. 6. 1999, p. 1. 13. 8. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 214/33 (30) Whereas administrative provisions should permit better administration monitoring and control of the rural development support; whereas measures are in the interest of simplicity should be based as far as possible on existing rules such as the integrated administration and control system set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92 (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1036/99 (2) and in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92 (3), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1678/98 (4); (31) Whereas it is appropriate to provide, both at Community and at Member State level, for a system of penalties to be imposed; (32) Whereas it is appropriate to repeal Commission Regu- lations (EEC) No 2084/80 (5), (EEC) No 220/91 (6), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1183/98 (7), (EC) No 1025/94 (9), Regulation (EC) No 860/94 (8), 1282/94 (11), (EC) No 1682/94 (13), (EC) No (EC) No 1844/94 (14), (EC) No 746/96, and also Com- mission Decisions 92/522/EEC (15) and 94/173/EC (16), the provisions of which have become obsolete or are replaced by the provisions of this Regulation; 1054/94 (10), 1404/94 (12), (EC) No (EC) No CHAPTER II RURAL DEVELOPMENT MEASURES SECTION 1 Investment in agricultural holdings Article 2 The conditions laid clown in Article 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 must be fulfilled at the time when the individual decision to grant support is taken. However, where investments are made in order to comply with newly introduced minimum standards regarding the environment, hygiene, and animal welfare, support may be granted in order to reach these new standards. In this case, a time period may be provided for the fulfilment of these minimum standards, where such a period is necessary to solve the specific problems in reaching such standards and where this period is in accordance with the specific legislation concerned. (33) Whereas the Committee on Agricultural Structures and Rural Development has not delivered an opinion within the time-limit set by its chairman, Article 3 HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: 1. For the purpose of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999, the existence of normal market outlets shall be assessed on the appropriate level in terms of: CHAPTER I OBJECTIVE Article 1 This Regulation lays down detailed rules for the application of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999. (1) OJ L 355, 5. 12. 1992, p. 1. (2) OJ L 127, 21. 5. 1999, p. 4. (3) OJ L 391, 31. 12. 1992, p. 36. (4) OJ L 212, 30. 7. 1998, p. 23. (5) OJ L 203, 5. 6. 1980, p. 9. (6) OJ L 26, 31. 1. 1991, p. 15. (7) OJ L 164, 9. 6. 1998, p. 5. (8) OJ L 99, 19. 4. 1994, p. 7. (9) OJ L 112, 3. 5. 1994, p. 27. (10) OJ L 115, 6. 5. 1994, p. 6. (11) OJ L 140, 3. 6. 1994, p. 14. (12) OJ L 154, 21. 6. 1994, p. 8. (13) OJ L 178, 12. 7. 1994, p. 42. (14) OJ L 192, 28. 7. 1994, p. 9. (15) OJ L 329, 16. 11. 1992, p. 1. (16) OJ L 79, 23. 3. 1994, p. 29. (a) the products concerned, (b) the types of investments, (c) existing and expected capacities. 2. Any restrictions on production, or limitations of Com- munity support under common market organisations shall be taken into account. 3. Where under a common market organisation, restric- tions on production or limitations of Community support exist at the level of individual farmers, holdings or processing plants, no investment shall be supported which would increase production beyond those restrictions or limitations. Article 4 1. Where investments are undertaken by young farmers, the maximum percentages of the volume of eligible investment as referred to in the second sentence of the second paragraph of Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 may be applied within a period up to five years after setting-up. The second paragraph of Article 5 also applies to 2. investments undertaken by young farmers within a five year period after setting-up. L 214/34 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 13. 8. 1999 SECTION 2 Article 10 Setting-up of young farmers Released land may be included in a re-parcelling operation or in a simple exchange of parcels. Article 5 The conditions laid down in Article 8(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 must be fulfilled at the time when the individual decision to grant support is taken. However, as far as occupational skill and competence, econ- omic viability and minimum standards regarding the environ- ment, hygiene and animal welfare are concerned, a time period not exceeding three years after setting-up may be foreseen for the fulfilment of these conditions, insofar as an adaptation period is necessary to facilitate the establishment of the young farmer or the structural adjustment of his holding. SECTION 3 Training Article 6 Support for vocational training shall not include courses of instruction or training which form part of normal programmes or systems of agricultural and forestry education at secondary or higher levels. SECTION 4 Early retirement Article 7 Where a farm is transferred by several transferors, overall support shall be limited to the amount provided for one transferor. Article 8 Non-commercial farming activity continued by the transferor in accordance with the first indent of Article 11(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 shall not be eligible for support under the common agricultural policy. In such cases, the conditions applicable to released land shall be applied to areas agronomically equivalent to those of the released land. Member States may make provision for released land to be taken in charge by a body which undertakes to reassign it at a later date to a transferee who satisfies the conditions laid down for early retirement. SECTION 5 Less favoured areas and areas with environmental restric- tions Article 11 Compensatory allowances in relation to areas used by several farmers in common for the purpose of grazing animals may be granted to each farmer using these areas in proportion to his use or, right of use, of the land. SECTION 6 Agri-environment Article 12 An undertaking to extensify livestock farming or otherwise to manage livestock farming shall comply with, at least, the following conditions: (a) grassland management shall continue, (b) the livestock shall be distributed across the farm in such a way that the whole of the grazed area is maintained, thus avoiding both over-grazing and under-utilization, and (c) livestock density must be defined taking into account all grazing livestock kept on the farm, or in the case of an undertaking aimed at limiting nutrient leaching, all live- stock kept on the farm relevant to the undertaking in question. Article 9 Article 13 A tenant farmer may transfer the released land to the owner provided that the lease is terminated and the requirements relating to the relevant transferee as laid down in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 are complied with. Support may include agri-environmental commitments for: (a) rearing farm animals of local breeds indigenous to the area and in danger of extinction, 13. 8. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 214/35 and (b) preserving plant genetic resources naturally adapted to the local and regional conditions and under threat of genetic erosion. The local breeds and plant genetic resources must play a role in maintaining the environment in the given area to which the measure will apply. Article 14 For the purpose of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999, capital works shall be considered to be non-remunerative provided that they do not normally lead to any significant net increase in farm value or profitability. Article 15 Agri-environment commitments beyond the minimum period of five years referred to in Article 23(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 shall not be determined for a longer period than that which is reasonably necessary for the realisation of their environmental effects. They shall normally be no longer than 10 years, except in the case of specific undertakings where a longer period is deemed to be indispens- able. Article 16 Various agri-environment commitments may be combined with one another provided that the commitments are comp- lementary and compatible. Where there is such a combination, the level of support shall take account of income forgone and specific additional costs arising from the combination. Article 17 The reference level for calculating income forgone and 1. additional costs resulting from the undertaking given shall be the usual good farming practice in the given area to which the measure applies. Where it is justified by the agronomic or environmental circumstances to do so, the economic consequences of aban- donment of land or cessation of certain farm practices may be taken into account. 2. Payments may not be made per unit of production, except in the case of support for rearing farm animals in danger of extinction, which may be paid per livestock unit or commitments are normally per animal expressed in units other than area, Member States may calculate payments on the basis of those units. reared. Where Member States shall ensure that the maximum amounts per year eligible for Community support as set out in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 are observed. To this end the Member State may: (a) set a limit on the number of units per hectare of the farm to which agri-environmental commitments apply, or (b) determine the overall maximum amount on each partici- pating farm and ensure that the payments for each holding are compatible with this limit. Payments shall be based on limitations on the use of 3. fertilisers, plant protection products or other inputs only if such limitations are technically and economically measurable. Article 18 Member States shall determine the need to provide an incentive as provided for in the third indent of Article 24(1) of the Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 on the basis of objective criteria. The incentive shall not exceed 20 % of the income forgone and additional costs due to the commitment given, except in the case of specific commitments where a higher rate is deemed to be indispensable for the effective implementation of the measure. Article 19 A farmer who gives an agri-environment commitment as to one part of a farm shall adhere to at least the standard of usual good farming practice throughout the farm. Article 20 1. Member States may authorise the transformation of one commitment into another commitment during the period of operation of the commitments, on condition that: (a) any such transfer is of unquestionable benefit to the environment, (b) the existing commitment is significantly reinforced, and (c) the approved programme includes the commitments con- cerned. L 214/36 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 13. 8. 1999 Under the conditions set out in points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph, a transformation of an agri-environment commitment into a commitment for afforestation of agricul- tural land according to Article 31 of the Council Regulation may be authorised. The agri-environment commitment shall cease without reimbursement being required. 2. Member States may provide for adjustment of commit- ments during the period of operation, provided that: (a) the approved programme includes scope for such adjust- ment, and (b) the adjustment is duly justified, having regard to the objectives of the undertaking. Article 23 In outermost regions, support may be granted for investment in the processing or marketing of products from third countries, subject to the condition that the processed products are destined for the market of the region in question. For the purpose of compliance with this condition, support shall be limited to processing capacities which correspond to regional needs, provided that the processing capacities do not exceed regional needs. SECTION 8 Forestry Article 24 SECTION 7 Improving processing and marketing of agricultural products Forests excluded from support under Article 29(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1757/1999 shall be: (a) forest or other wooded land owned by central or regional governments, or by government-owned corporations, Article 21 (b) crown forest and other wooded land, Eligible expenditure may include: (a) the construction and acquisition of immovable property, with the exception of land purchase, (c) forests owned by legal persons at least 50 % of whose capital is held by one of the institutions referred to in points (a) and (b). (b) new machinery and equipment including computer software, Article 25 (c) general costs, such as architects’, engineers’ and consul- tants’ fees, feasibility studies, acquisition of patents and licences, in addition to expenditure as referred to in (a) and (b) and up to a ceiling of 11 % of that expenditure. Agricultural land eligible for support for afforestation accord- ing to Article 31 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 shall be specified by the Member State and shall include in particular arable land, grassland, permanent pastures and land used for perennial crops, where farming takes place on a regular basis. Article 22 1. For the purpose of Article 26(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999, the existence of normal market outlets shall be assessed on the appropriate level in relation to: (a) the products concerned, (b) the types of investments, (c) existing and excepted capacities. Article 26 1. For the purpose of the second indent of the second subparagraph of Article 31(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999, a ‘farmer’ shall be a person who devotes an essential part of his working time to agricultural activities and derives from it a significant part of his income according to detailed criteria to be determined by the Member State. Any restrictions on production, or limitations of Com- 2. munity support under common market organisations shall be taken into account. 2. For the purpose of Article 31(3), subparagraph 2, of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999, ‘fast-growing species cultivated in the short term’ shall mean species, the rotation time (the interval separating at the same place two harvest cuts) of which is less than 15 years. 13. 8. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 214/37 Article 27 Support under Article 32 of Council Regulation (EC) 1. No 1257/1999 may not be granted in relation to areas for which support under Article 31 of that Regulation has been granted. 2. Payments with a view to maintaining fire-breaks through agricultural measures, according to Article 32(1) second indent of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 shall not be granted for areas which are the subject of agri-environment support. They shall be consistent with any restrictions on production or limitations of Community support under common market organisations and shall take into account payments made under those common market organisations. 2. When, during the period of operation of a commitment given as a condition for the grant of support, a beneficiary increases the area of his holding, Member States may provide for: (a) the extension of the commitment to the additional area for the remainder of the period of the commitment, on condition that any such extension: (i) is of unquestionable benefit to the measure concerned, (ii) is justified in terms of the nature of the commitment, the length of the remaining period, and the size of the additional area which must be significantly less than the original area or not more than two hectares, and (iii) does not diminish the effective verification of com- pliance with the conditions for the grant of support, SECTION 9 or Rules common to several measures Article 28 For the purposes of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 and of this Regulation, ‘usual good farming practice’ is the standard of farming which a reasonable farmer would follow in the region concerned. Member States shall set out verifiable standards in their rural development plans. In any case, these standards shall entail compliance with general mandatory environmental require- ments. Article 29 1. When, during the period of operation of a commitment given as a condition for the grant of support, a beneficiary transfers all or part of his holding to another person, the latter may take over the commitment for the remainder of the period. the beneficiary shall reimburse the support granted. this does not take place, If Member States may choose not to require such reimbursement if, in the case of a definitive cessation of agricultural activities by a beneficiary who has already honoured a significant part of his commitment, a takeover of the commitment by a successor proves not to be feasible. Member States may take specific measures, in the event of minor changes to the situation of the holding, to prevent the application of the first subparagraph from leading to inappropriate results in terms of the commitment entered into. (b) the replacement of the beneficiary’s original commitment by a new commitment for the whole area concerned under terms at least as strict as those of the original commitment. Point (b) shall also apply in cases where the area subject to a commitment is extended within the holding. 3. Where a beneficiary is unable to continue complying with commitments given, by virtue of the fact that the holding is subject to reparcellation or other similar public exercise of land consolidation, Member States shall take the measures necessary to provide for the adaptation of the commitments to the new situation of the holding. If such adaptation proves impossible, the commitment shall expire and reimbursement shall not be required in respect of the period in which the commitment was effective. Article 30 1. Without prejudice to the actual circumstances to be taken into consideration in individual cases, Member States may recognize, in particular, the following categories of force majeure: (a) death of the farmer; (b) long-term professional incapacity of the farmer; (c) expropriation of a large part of the holding if such expropriation could not have been anticipated on the day on which the commitment was given; (d) a severe natural disaster gravely affecting the holdings’ agricultural land; L 214/38 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 13. 8. 1999 (e) the accidental destruction of livestock buildings on the (c) holding; (f) an epizootic affecting part or all the farmer’s livestock. in the case of support for less-favoured areas and support for environmental restrictions, agri-environment commit- ments shall take into account the conditions laid down for the support in the areas concerned. Member States shall notify the Commission of categories which they recognize as force majeure. 2. Cases of force majeure with relevant evidence to the satisfaction of the competent authority shall be lodged in writing with the competent authority within 10 working days of the date on which the farmer is in a position to do so. CHAPTER III Where there is such a combination, the leveL of support shall take account of income forgone and specific additional costs arising from the combination. In no case may the same commitment be the subject of payments simultaneously under agri-environment support and under another Community aid scheme. 3. Any exception referred to in the first indent of the second subparagraph of Article 37(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 shall be proposed by Member States in the framework of rural development plans. GENERAL PRINCIPLES, ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS Article 32 Payments under rural development measures shall be made in full to the beneficiaries. SECTION 1 General principles Article 31 SECTION 2 Programming Article 33 For the application of the second subparagraph of Article 1. 37(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999, the criteria set out in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article shall apply. 2. Environmental measures implemented under common market organisations, agricultural quality and health measures, or under than agri- rural development measures other environment support, do not preclude agri-environment sup- port for the same productions, provided that such support is additional and consistent with those measures. In this context: (a) agri-environment measures on land set aside pursuant to Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1251/1999 (1) shall qualify for support only if the commitments go beyond the appropriate environmental measures referred to in Article 6(2) of that Regulation; (b) in the case of extensification of beef production, the aid shall take account of the extensification payment made pursuant to Article 13 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 (2). 1. Rural development plans shall be submitted in confor- mity with Article 43 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 and in accordance with the detailed requirements laid down in the Annex to this Regulation. 2. The approval pursuant to Article 44 (2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 shall determine the overall amount of Community support. 3. The approval may cover State aid intended to provide additional financing to rural development measures only if the State aid is identified in accordance with point 16 of the Annex. 4. Member States shall make rural development program- ming documents available to the public. Article 34 Where rural development measures are submitted in the form of general framework regulations, rural development plans shall make appropriate reference to such regulations. (1) OJ L 160, 26. 6. 1999, p. 1. (2) OJ L 160, 26. 6. 1999, p. 21. In such circumstances, the requirements of Article 33 shall be fully adhered to. 13. 8. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 214/39 Article 35 SECTION 3 1. Amendments to rural development programming docu- ments shall be duly substantiated, in particular on the basis of the following information: (a) the reasons and problems of implementation, if any, justifying adjustment of the programming document; (b) the expected effects of the amendment; (c) the implications for financing and verification of commit- ments. 2. The Commission shall approve in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 50(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 amendments to rural development program- ming documents: (a) affecting priorities; Additional measures and community initiatives Article 36 Pursuant to Article 45 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999, the scope of assistance from the EAGGF Guidance section for measures in the Community initiative for rural development is extended to the whole Community and its financing extended to measures eligible under European Parliament Council Regulations (EC) No 1261/1999 (1) and (EC) No 1262/1 999 (2). SECTION 4 Financial provisions Article 37 (b) changing the main features of support measures as indi- including changes to the rate of cated in the Annex, Community contribution; The Member States shall forward to the Commission, for each rural later than 30 September each year, 1. not development programming document: (c) changing the overall amount of Community support; (d) changing the financial allocation for any measure by more than either 25 % in relation to the amount provided for the year concerned, for the measure concerned, or 5 % in relation to the overall amount provided for the year concerned whichever is greater, calculated on the basis of the rural development programming document approved by the Commission; (a) a statement of expenditure incurred in the current financial year and of expenditure remaining to be disbursed by the end of that year, and (b) amended expenditure forecasts for subsequent financial years until the end of the programming period in question, in accordance with the allocation for each Member State. (e) changing additional financing by means of State aid for any measure by more than 25 % in relation to the amount foreseen for the year concerned, for the measure concerned or 5 % in relation to the overall amount foreseen for the year concerned whichever is greater, calculated on the basis of the rural development programming document approved by the Commission. 2. Without prejudice to the general rules established for budgetary discipline, where the information which Member States are required to transmit to the Commission according to paragraph 1 is incomplete or the time limit has not been met, the Commission shall reduce advances on entry in the accounts of agricultural expenditure on a temporary and flat-rate basis. Amendments shall be submitted to the Commission in a single proposal per programme per year. Article 38 Any other amendment shall be communicated to the Com- mission at least two months before its entry into force. For the month following the decision to approve a rural development programming document the paying agencies may enter into the accounts as expenditure an advance not exceeding 12,5 % of the average annual budget of the total Community allocations provided for in the programming document in question. 3. Where necessary, rural development programming docu- ments shall be revised in line with subsequent changes in Community legislation. The second sentence of the first subparagraph of paragraph 2 shall not apply to such revisions. (1) OJ L 161, 26. 6. 1999, p. 43. (2) OJ L 161, 26. 6. 1999, p. 48. L 214/40 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 13. 8. 1999 This advance shall represent working capital which in principle may only be recovered at the programming period with respect to each rural development programming document. the end of Article 39 1. For each Member State, expenditure declared for any given financial year shall be financed up to the limit of the amounts notified to the Commission under point (b) of Article 37(1) which are covered by the appropriations entered in the budget for the financial year in question. 2. Where expenditure actually incurred by a Member State in any given financial year exceeds the amounts notified in accordance with point (b) of Article 37(1), the overruns on expenditure in that financial year shall be entered in the accounts on a pro rata basis, up to the limit of the appropri- ations remaining available after reimbursing the expenditure incurred by the other Member States. SECTION 5 Monitoring and evaluation Article 41 Pursuant to Article 48(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999, annual progress reports shall be submitted to the Commission by 30 April of each year covering the previous calendar year. Each progress report shall contain the following information: (a) any change in the general conditions of relevance to the implementation of the measure, and in particular any major socio-economic trends, or changes in national, regional or sectoral policies; (b) the progress of measures and of priorities, with respect to their operational and specific objectives, expressed as quantitative indicators; (c) the action taken by the management authority and the monitoring committee, if any, to ensure high-quality and effective implementation, and in particular: 3. Where expenditure actually incurred by a Member State in a given financial year is less than 75 % of the amounts referred to in paragraph 1, the expenditure to be recognised for the following financial year shall be reduced by a third of the difference between this threshold and the actual expenditure incurred during the financial year in question. (i) monitoring measures, financial control and evaluation, including data collection procedures, (ii) a summary of the major problems encountered in managing the measure and any steps taken; This reduction shall not be taken into account when estab- lishing actual expenditure in the financial year following that in which the reduction was made. 1. Paragraph 3 shall not apply in relation to the first declaration of expenditure under the rural development pro- gramming document. Article 40 Participation in the financing of evaluations in the Member States pursuant to Article 49(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 shall apply to evaluations that effectively contribute to the evaluation at Community level owing to their scope, particularly through their replies to the common evaluation questions, and through their quality. (d) measures taken to ensure compatibility with Community policies. These indicators referred to in the first subparagraph, point (b), shall, as far as possible follow a recommendation for common indicators to be provided by the Commission. Where additional indicators are needed to monitor progress effectively towards objectives of rural development programming docu- ments, these shall also be included. Article 42 Evaluations shall be performed by independent evalua- 1. tors in accordance with recognised evaluation practice. Evaluations shall 2. in particular respond to common evaluation questions defined by the Commission in consul- tation with Member States and shall, as a general rule, be accompanied by achievement related criteria and indicators. The participation shall not exceed 50 % of a ceiling which, except in duly justified cases, shall be 1 % of the total costs the rural development programme. Within each rural of development program at least 40 % of the co-financing shall concern the ex postevaluation. 3. The authority responsible for managing the rural devel- opment programming document shall assemble the appropri- ate resources for evaluations, making use of monitoring results, supplemented where necessary by the gathering of additional information. 13. 8. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 214/41 Article 43 Article 45 1. The ex ante evaluation shall analyse the disparities, gaps and potentials of the current situation and assess the consistency of the proposed strategy with the situation and targets and have regard to the issues raised in the common evaluation questions. It shall assess the expected impact of the selected priorities for action and quantify their targets where they lend themselves thereto. It shall also verify the proposed implementing arrangements and the consistency with the Common Agricultural Policy and other policies. 1. A mid-term evaluation report shall be transmitted to the Commission not later than 31 December 2003. The authority responsible for managing the rural development programming document shall inform the Commission about the follow-up to the recommendations in this evaluation report. The Com- mission shall prepare a Community-level synthesis upon receipt of the individual evaluation reports. An update of the mid-term evaluation shall be completed by 31 December 2005 where appropriate. 2. The ex ante evaluation shall be the responsibility of the authorities preparing the rural development plan and shall form part of it. Article 44 1. The mid-term and ex post evaluations shall deal with the specific questions for the rural development programming document in question and with common evaluation questions relevant at Community level. The latter shall involve the living conditions and structure of the rural population, employment and income from farm activities or off-farm activities, agricul- tural structures, agricultural commodities, quality, competi- If a common tiveness, evaluation question is considered inappropriate in relation to a particular rural development programming document. this shall be substantiated. forest resources and environment. 2. The mid-term evaluation, while covering the evaluation questions, shall in particular examine the initial achievements, their relevance and consistency with the rural development programming document and the extent to which the targets have been attained. It shall also assess the use made of financial resources and the operation of monitoring and implementation. 2. An ex post evaluation report shall be transmitted to the Commission not later than two years after the end of the programming period. Within three years of the end of the programming period and upon receipt of the individual evaluation reports the Commission shall prepare a Com- munity-level synthesis. 3. The evaluation reports shall explain the methodologies applied, including the implications for the quality of the data and the findings. They shall include a description of the context and contents of the programme, financial information, the answers including the utilised indicators to the common evaluation questions and to the evaluation questions defined at national or regional lever, conclusions and recommendations. Their structure shall, as far as possible, follow a recommen- dation for a common structure for the evaluation reports to be provided by the Commission. SECTION 6 Applications, controls and sanctions Article 46 The ex post evaluation, while answering the evaluation ques- tions, shall in particular examine the utilisation of resources and the effectiveness and efficiency of the assistance and its impacts and it shall draw conclusions regarding rural development policy, including its contributions to the Com- mon Agricultural Policy. 1. Applications for rural development support relating to areas or animals, which are lodged separately from aid applications under Article 4 of Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92 shall indicate all areas and all animals of the holding relevant for checking the applications under the measure in question, including those for which no support is requested. 3. The mid-term and ex post evaluations shall be performed in consultation with the Commission under the responsibility of the authority in charge of managing the rural development programming. 2. Where a rural development support measure relates to areas, it shall refer to individually identified parcels. During the period of operation of an undertaking, parcels to which support refers may not be exchanged save as otherwise provided for in rural development programming document. 4. The quality of individual evaluations shall be assessed by the authority in charge of managing the rural development programming document, the monitoring committee, if any, and the Commission using recognised methods. The results of the evaluations shall be available to the public. 3. Where the application for payment is included with an application for area aid in the integrated control system, the Member State shall ensure that parcels for which rural development support is requested are declared separately in the application for area aid in the integrated control system. L 214/42 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 13. 8. 1999 Land areas and animals shall be identified in accordance 4. with Articles 4 and 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92. Moreover, Articles 11(1) (a), 12, 13 and 14 of Regulation (EEC) No 3887/9 shall apply to such supports. Article 47 1. Initial applications to a scheme and successive appli- cations for payment shall be checked in a manner which ensures effective verification of compliance with the conditions for the granting of the aid. In fine with the nature of the support measure Member States shall define the systems and means for their verification as well as the persons who shall be subject to checks. In all appropriate cases, Member States shall make use of the integrated administration and control system established by Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92. Verifications shall be carried out by means of adminis- 2. trative and on-the-spot checks. Administrative checks shall be exhaustive and shall 3. include cross-checks, inter alia in all appropriate cases with data from the integrated administration and control system, on areas of land and livestock covered by a support measure in order to avoid all unjustified payments of aid. Compliance with long-term commitments shall also be checked. 4. On-the-spot checks shall be made in accordance with Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92. They shall cover at least 5 % of beneficiaries each year, covering all the different types of rural development measures set out in the programming documents. On-the-spot checks shall be spread over the year in accordance with an analysis of the risks presented by each rural develop- ment measure. All commitments and obligations of a benefi- ciary which it is possible to check at the time of the visit shall be subject to checking. Article 48 Article 9(1) and (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92 1. shall apply to support granted on the basis of areas, and Article 10(2), (3), (7), (11) and (12) of that Regulation shall apply to support granted on the basis of animals. 2. Member States shall determine a system of penalties to be imposed in the event of breaches of the obligations entered into and of regulatory provisions applicable to the case, and shall take all necessary steps to put the system into operation. Such penalties shall be effective, shall be commensurate with their purpose and shall have an adequately deterrent effect. 3. Where it is found that a false declaration has been made as a result of serious negligence, the beneficiary in question shall be excluded from all rural development measures falling under the relevant chapter of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 for the calendar year in question. In the case of a false declaration made intentionally, he shall be excluded for the following year as well. This penalty shall apply without prejudice to additional penalties provided for under national rules. CHAPTER IV FINAL RULES Article 49 1. Regulations (EEC) No 2084/80, (EEC) No 220/91, (EC) No 860/94, (EC) No 1025/94, (EC) No 1054/94, (EC) No 1282/94, (EC) No 1844/94, (EC) No 746/96 and Decisions 92/522/EEC and 94/173/EC are hereby repealed. (EC) No 1682/94, (EC) No 1404/94, 2. The Regulations and Decisions repealed under paragraph 1 shall remain applicable to the actions approved by the Commission before 1 January 2000, under the Regulations referred to in Article 55(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999. Article 50 This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. It shall apply in relation to Community support as from 1 January 2000. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, 23 July 1999. For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission 13. 8. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 214/43 ANNEX RURAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS 1. Title of rural development plan 2. Member State and administrative region (if relevant) 3. 1. Geographical area covered by the plan Article 41 of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 2. Regions classified as Objectives 1 and 2 Article 40 of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 Identify: — Objective 1 regions and Objective 1 regions in transition. This applies only to the accompanying measures (early retirement, compensatory allowances, agri-environment and afforestation of agricultural land under Article 31 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999); — Objective 2 regions. This applies to: 1) Accompanying measures 2) Other measures which do not form part of the Objective 2 programming. 4. Planning at the relevant geographical area Article 41(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 Where exceptionally more than one rural development plan will apply in the region, indicate: — all the relevant plans; — why it is not possible to integrate measures into a single plan; — relationship between measures in the different plans and details as to how compatibility and consistency between plans will be ensured. 5. Quantified description of the current situation Article 43(1), first indent, of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1995 1. Description of the current situation Describe, using quantified data, the current situation of the geographical area, highlighting strengths, disparities, gaps and potential for rural development. This description shall concern the agricultural sector and the forestry sector (including the nature and extent of handicaps in farming in any less favoured areas), the rural economy, the demographic situation, human resources and employment and the state of the environment. 2. Impacts of the previous programming period Describe the impacts of the financial resources deployed in the framework of the EAGGF relating to Rural Development in the previous programming period and under the accompanying measures since 1992. Present results of evaluations. L 214/44 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 13. 8. 1999 3. Other information Where relevant, extend description to measures in addition to Community rural development and accompanying measures which had an impact on the programming area concerned. 6. Description of the strategy proposed, its quantified objectives, rural development priorities selected and geographical area covered Article 43(1), second indent, of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 1. Strategy proposed, quantified objectives, priorities selected With regard to the identified strengths, disparities, gaps and potentials in the area concerned, describe in particular: — the priorities for actions, — the appropriate strategy to attain the priorities, — the operational objectives and expected impacts, quantified where they lend themselves to quantification, quantified as well in terms of monitoring as in terms of evaluation estimates, — the extent to which the strategy takes account of the specific features of the areas concerned, — the way the integrated approach has been included, — the extent to which the strategy takes into account the integration of women and men, — the extent to which the strategy takes into account all relevant international Community and national environmental policy obligations, including those relating to sustainable development, in particular the quality and use of water, conservation of biodiversity including on-farm conservation of crop varieties, and global warming. 2. Description and effects of other measures In addition, the description shall, where relevant, explain measures taken outside the frame of the rural development plan (whether other Community measures or national measures, such as compulsory rules, codes of practice and State aided measures) and the extent to which the identified needs will thus be met. 3. Areas covered by specific territorial measures Describe for any measure as defined under point 8 which does not apply throughout the region indicated in point 3, the zone of application. In particular, define: — the adopted list of less-favoured areas for the area concerned, — any amendments to the list of less favoured areas with a due justification (Article 55(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999), — areas with environmental restrictions with a due justification. 4. Time-scheme and uptake Proposed timetable for implementing the various measures, expected uptake, and duration (see also point 8). 13. 8. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 214/45 7. Appraisal showing the expected economic, environmental and social impacts Article 43(1), third indent, of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 Detailed indications according to Article 43 [Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999]. 8. Indicative overall financial table Article 43(1,) fourth indent, of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 Financial planning table: rural development programmes Year 1 Year 2. Year 7 Total Total or public cost (1) UE contri- bution (2) Total or public cost (1) UE contri- bution (2) Total or public cost (1) UE contri- bution (2) Total or public cost (1) UE contri- bution (2) (EUR million) Priority A. Measure A1 Measure A2. Measure An Total A Priority B. Measure B1 Measure B2. Measure Bn Total B. Priority N Measure N1 Measure N2 ···. Measure Nn Total N Programme: EAGGF Guarantee resources for measures for promoting the adaptation and development of rural areas (Article 33 of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999) in Objective 2 (rural) areas: EUR million (% of total for Article 33) (1) This column concerns forecast expenditure (in terms of either total or public cost), and is presented for indicative purposes. (2) This column concerns the Community contribution for each measure. The Community contribution relating to expenditure undertaken is calculated according to the rates and modalities set out for each measure in the programme. Note: Where the same measure features under more than one priority, for purposes of financial management the Member State shall provide an additional table consolidating all expenditures relating to the measure. This additional table shall follow the structure of the above table and shall follow the order of the list below. — Measures are defined as follows: (a) investment in agricultural holdings; (b) setting up of young farmers; (c) training; (d) early retirement; L 214/46 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 13. 8. 1999 (e) less favoured areas and areas with environmental restrictions; (f) agri-environment; (g) improving processing and marketing of agricultural products; (h) afforestation of agricultural land; (i) other forestry measures; (j) land improvement; (k) reparcelling; (l) setting up of farm relief and farm management services; (m) marketing of quality agricultural products; (n) basic services for the rural economy and population; (o) renovation and development of villages and protection and conservation of the rural heritage; (p) diversification of agricultural activities and activities close to agriculture to provide multiple activities or alternative incomes; (q) agricultural water resources management; (r) development and improvement of infrastructure connected with the development of agriculture; (s) encouragement for tourist and craft activities; (t) protection of the environment in connection with agriculture, forestry and landscape conservation as well as the improvement of animal welfare; (u) restoring agricultural production potential damaged by natural disasters and introducing appropriate prevention instruments; (v) financial engineering. 9. Description of the measures contemplated for implementing the plans Article 43(1), fifth indent, of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 For every point thereunder, provide: A. Main features of support measures, B. Other elements. 1. General requirements A. Main features of support measures: — list of measures in the order of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999; — identification of the single Article (and paragraph) under which each Rural development payment measure falls. Where two or more articles are cited, the payment measure must be divided into its constituent parts. B. Other elements: None. 13. 8. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 214/47 2. Requirements which concern all or several measures (1). A. Main features: — Community contribution based on either the total cost or public expenditure; — aid intensifies and/or amounts and differentiation applied (Chapters I to VIII); — exceptions referred to in Article 37 (3) subparagraph 2 first indent of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999. B. Other elements: — details of eligibility conditions; — criteria to demonstrate economic viability (Chapters I, II and IV); — usual good farming practice (Chapters V and VI); — minimum standards regarding environment, hygiene and animal welfare (Chapters I, II and VII); — level of occupational skill and competence required (Chapters I, II and IV); — sufficient assessment of the existence of normal market outlets for the products concerned (Chapters I and VII) according to Articles 6 and 26 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999; — description of the total of ongoing contracts (from the previous period), including in financial terms, and procedures/rules which apply to these. 3. Information required for specific measures In addition, the following specific information is required for measures under the individual chapters: I. I n v e s t m e n t i n a g r i c u l t u r a l h o l d i n g s A. Main features: — primary production sectors and types of investments; B. Other elements: — maximum limits for total investment amount eligible for support; — types of aid. II. S e t t i n g - u p o f y o u n g f a r m e r s A. Main features: None. B. Other elements: — period left to young farmers to fulfil the eligibility criteria within the allowed period of three years according to Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999, — age limit, — conditions applying to young farmers not established as sole head of the holding or who set up as members of associations or co-operatives whose principal object is the management of an agricultural holding, — type of setting-up aid. (1) References to Chapters refer to Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999. L 214/48 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 13. 8. 1999 III. T r a i n i n g A. Main features: None. B. Other elements: — eligible actions and beneficiaries; — ensure that no normal education system and programmes are proposed for financing. IV. E a r l y r e t i r e m e n t A. Main features: None. B. Other elements: — detail of conditions concerning transferor, transferee, worker and land released, in particular the use of land to be retained by the transferor for non commercial purposes and the period to improve viability; — type of aid including a description of the system used for calculating the maximum co-financible amount per holding and a justification according to the type of beneficiary; — description of national retirement and early retirement systems; — detail on the duration of the aid. V. L e s s f a v o u r e d a r e a s a n d a r e a s w i t h e n v i r o n m e n t a l r e s t r i c t i o n s A. Main features: — level of aid amount: 1. 2. 3. for compensatory allowances according to Article 13 point (a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999: justification of the modulation of the aid amount according the criteria of Article 15(2) of the Council Regulation; for compensatory allowances according to Article 13 point (a) of the Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999: proposals to use the flexibility provisions concerning the maximum co-financible amount in Article 15(3), second subparagraph of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 shall include the necessary justification. Specify how it will be assured that the upper limit for compensatory allowances is respected in these cases and explain the administrative procedure by which they will ensure adherence to the maximum co-financible amount; for compensatory payments according to Article 13 point (b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 and Article 16 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999: Detailed agronomic calculations showing: (a) income foregone and costs incurred resulting from the environmental restrictions, (b) agronomic assumptions used as reference point. B. Other elements: — details on eligibility conditions concerning: 1. the definition of the minimum surface; 2. the description of the appropriate conversion mechanism used in case of common pastures. 13. 8. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 214/49 VI. A g r i - e n v i r o n m e n t A. Main features: — a justification for the undertakings with regard to their expected impacts; — concerning breeds of farm animal in danger of extinction, evidence of the endangered statue of the breed consistent with scientific data accepted by international organisations regarded as authorities in this field; — concerning plant genetic resources under threat of genetic erosion, evidence of genetic erosion based upon scientific results and indicators for the occurance of landraces/primitive (local) varieties, their population diversity and the prevailing agricultural practices at local level; — precise detail of obligations on farmers and any other conditions of agreement, including scope and procedures for adjustment of running contracts; — description of coverage of measure showing extent of application according to needs, degree of targeting in terms of geographical, sectoral or other coverage; — detailed agronomic calculations showing: (a) income foregone and cost; incurred with regard to usual good agricultural practice, (b) agronomic assumptions used as reference point (c) level of incentive and justification for incentive based on objective criteria; — for the agri-environment undertakings together, possibilities for combination; of-undertakings should be shown and coherence of undertakings should be ensured. B. Other elements: None. VII. P r o c e s s i n g a n d m a r k e t i n g o f a g r i c u l t u r a l p r o d u c t s A. Main features: — sectors of the basic agricultural production. B. Other elements: — criteria to prove economic benefits for primary producers. VIII. F o r e s t r y A. Main features: — definition of: — ‘agricultural land’ in relation to Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999; — ‘farmer’ in relation to Article 26 of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999; — provisions ensuring that such actions are adapted to local conditions and are compatible with the environment as well as where appropriate keeping balance between silviculture and game populations; — contractual arrangements between regions and potential beneficiaries concerning actions related to Article 32 of the Council Regulation. B. Other elements: — description of eligible actions and beneficiaries; — linkage between proposed actions and national/sub-national forest programmes or equivalent instruments; L 214/50 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 13. 8. 1999 — the existence of forest protection plans as laid down in Community legislation for areas classified as high or medium forest fire risk and the conformity of proposed measures with these protection plans. IX. P r o m o t i n g t h e a d a p t a t i o n a n d d e v e l o p m e n t o f r u r a l a r e a s A. Main features: — description and justification of the action proposed under each measure. B. Other elements — definition of financial engineering, which shall be in accordance with general eligibility criteria. 10. Need for any studies, demonstration projects, training or technical assistance operations (where appropriate) Article 43(1), sixth indent, of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 11. Designation of competent authorities and bodies responsible Article 43(1), seventh indent, of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 12. Provisions to ensure the effective and correct implementation of the plans including monitoring and evaluation, a definition of quantified indicators for evaluation, arrangements for controls and sanctions and adequate publicity. Article 43(1), eighth indent, of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 1. Detailed indications on the implementation of Articles 41 to 45 of the [Regulation(EC) No 1257/1999] They should include in particular: — the description of the financial circuits for the payment of assistance to final beneficiaries, — the arrangements for monitoring and evaluation of the programme, notably systems and procedures for the collection, organisation and coordination of data relating to financial physical and impact indicators, — the role, composition and rules of procedure of any monitoring committees, — codification. This codification shall be in accordance with the model provided by the Commission. 2. Detailed indications on the implementation of Articles 46 to 48 of [Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999]; in particular in relation to the respect of general eligibility criteria This should include the precise control measures envisaged to verify the substance of the claim and the respect of the conditions for support and the precise sanction rules. 13. Results of consultations and designation of associated authorities and bodies as well as economic and social partners Article 43(1), ninth indent, of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1995 1. Describe: — the economic and social partners and other national relevant bodies to be consulted according to national rules and practice, 13. 8. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 214/51 — the agricultural and environmental authorities and bodies to be associated in particular with the development, implementation, monitoring, evaluation and review of agri-environment measures and other measures targeted to environment, thus ensuring the balance between these measures and other rural development measures. 2. Summarise the results of consultations and indicate the extent to which and the views and advice received have been taken into account 14. Balance between the different support measures Article 43(2), second indent, of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 1. Describe, with reference to the strengths, needs and potential: — the balance between the different rural development measures; — the extent to which the agri-environment measures apply throughout the territory. 2. This description shall, according to the case, make reference to: — measures taken outside the frame of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999, — measures taken or foreseen under separate rural development plans. 15. Compatibility and consistency Article 37(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 A. Main features: 1. Appraisal of the compatibility and consistency with: — other Community policies and measures implemented thereunder, in particular competition policy, — other instruments under Common Agricultural Policy, in particular where exceptions to Article 37(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/199S are foreseen, — other support measures within the rural development plans, — general eligibility criteria. 2. In relation to measures under Article 33 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999, ensure and where necessary clarify that: — measures taken under the sixth, seventh and ninth indents of that Article are not the subject of financing under the ERDF in rural areas in Objective 2 areas and in areas in transition, — measures do not fall within the scope of any other measure referred to in Chapter II of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999. B. Other elements 3. In particular, the appraisal shall cover arrangements to ensure proper coordination with administrations responsible for: — development measures introduced in the framework of the market organisations, — any rural development measures provided for under national legislation. L 214/52 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 13. 8. 1999 16. Additional State aids Article 52 of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 A. Main features Identify the measures in respect of which State aid intended to provide additional financing will be granted (Article 52 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999). An indicative table shall set out the amount of additional support to be granted in respect of each of the measures concerned during each year covered by the plan. B. Other elements. None


title: Decizia Comisiei din 23 iulie 1999 privind încheierea a două acorduri de cooperare între Comunitatea Europeană a Energiei Atomice și Cabinetul de Miniștri al Ucrainei în domeniul securității nucleare și în domeniul fuziunii nucleare controlate [notificată cu numărul C(1999) 2405]

eurovoc_concepts:
EAEC
Ukraine
cooperation agreement (EU)
nuclear fusion
nuclear safety

formats: html pdf print xhtml

text: 80 RO Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene 11/vol. 30 32002D0924 27. 11. 2002 JURNALUL OFICIAL AL COMUNITĂȚILOR EUROPENE L 322/32 DECIZIA COMISIEI din 23 iulie 1999 privind încheierea a două acorduri de cooperare între Comunitatea Europeană a Energiei Atomice ș(cid:13)i Cabinetul de Miniș(cid:13)tri al Ucrainei în domeniul securității nucleare ș(cid:13)i în domeniul fuziunii nucleare controlate [notificată cu numărul C(1999) 2405] (2002/924/Euratom) COMISIA COMUNITĂȚILOR EUROPENE, având în vedere Tratatul de instituire a Comunității Europene a Energiei Atomice, în special articolul 101 al doilea paragraf, având în vedere aprobarea Consiliului, întrucât trebuie încheiate două acorduri între Comunitatea Europeană a Energiei Atomice ș(cid:13)i Cabinetul de Miniș(cid:13)tri al Ucrainei în domeniul securității nucleare ș(cid:13)i în domeniul fuziunii nucleare controlate, DECIDE: Cele două acorduri între Comunitatea Europeană a Energiei Atomice ș(cid:13)i Cabinetul de Miniș(cid:13)tri al Ucrainei în domeniul securității nucleare ș(cid:13)i în domeniul fuziunii nucleare controlate sunt încheiate în numele Comunității Europene a Energiei Atomice. Articol unic Textele celor două acorduri se ataș(cid:13)ează la prezenta decizie. Adoptată la Bruxelles, 23 iulie 1999. Pentru Comisie Hans VAN DEN BROEK Membru al Comisiei


title: Richtlinie 1999/76/EG der Kommission vom 23. Juli 1999 zur Festlegung gemeinschaftlicher Analysemethoden für die Bestimmung von Lasalocid-Natrium in Futtermitteln (Text von Bedeutung für den EWR)

eurovoc_concepts:
animal nutrition
antibiotic
food additive
food chemistry
medicinal product

formats: html pdf print

text: 6. 8. 1999 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 207/13 RICHTLINIE 1999/76/EG DER KOMMISSION vom 23. Juli 1999 zur Festlegung gemeinschaftlicher Analysemethoden für die Bestimmung von Lasalocid-Natrium in Futtermitteln (Text von Bedeutung für den EWR) DIE KOMMISSION DER EUROPÄISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — HAT FOLGENDE RICHTLINIE ERLASSEN: gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft, gestützt auf die Richtlinie 70/373/EWG des Rates vom 20. Juli 1970 über die Einführung gemeinschaftlicher Probenahmever- fahren und Analysemethoden für die amtliche Untersuchung von Futtermitteln (1), zuletzt geändert durch die Akte über den Beitritt Österreichs, Finnlands und Schwedens, insbesondere auf Artikel 2, in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe: Gemäß der Richtlinie 70/373/EWG werden die amtli- chen Untersuchungen von Futtermitteln zur Festlegung, ob die aufgrund der Rechts- und Verwaltungsvor- schriften festgelegten Anforderungen an Beschaffenheit und Zusammensetzung der Futtermittel erfüllt sind, nach gemeinschaftlichen Probenahmeverfahren und Analyse- methoden durchgeführt. Gemäß der Richtlinie 70/524/EWG des Rates vom 23. November 1970 über Zusatzstoffe in Tierernährung (2), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie (EG) Nr. 866/1999 der Kommission (3) muß der Gehalt an Lasalocid- Natrium bei der Etikettierung angegeben werden, wenn dieser Stoff Vormischungen oder Futtermitteln zugesetzt wird. Artikel 1 Die Mitgliedstaaten schreiben vor, daß die Analysen für die amtliche Untersuchung von Futtermitteln und Vormischungen auf ihren Gehalt an Lasalocid-Natrium nach den im Anhang beschriebenen Methoden durchgeführt werden. Artikel 2 Die Mitgliedstaaten erlassen und veröffentlichen spätestens bis zum 31. Januar 2000 die erforderlichen Rechts- und Verwal- tungsvorschriften, um den Bestimmungen dieser Richtlinie nachzukommen. Sie setzen die Kommission davon unverzüg- lich in Kenntnis. Sie wenden die Maßnahmen ab dem 1. Februar 2000 an. Wenn die Mitgliedstaaten diese Vorschriften erlassen, nehmen sie in den Vorschriften selbst oder durch einen Hinweis bei der amtlichen Veröffentlichung auf diese Richtlinie Bezug. Die Mitgliedstaaten regeln die Einzelheiten dieser Bezugnahme. Artikel 3 Diese Richtlinie tritt am zwanzigsten Tag nach ihrer Veröffent- lichung im Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften in Kraft. Diese Richtlinie ist an alle Mitgliedstaaten gerichtet. Artikel 4 sind gemeinschaftliche Analysemethoden für die Es Kontrolle dieses Stoffs festzulegen. Brüssel, den 23. Juli 1999 Die in dieser Verordnung vorgesehenen Maßnahmen entsprechen der Stellungnahme des Ständigen Futtermit- telausschusses — Für die Kommission Franz FISCHLER Mitglied der Kommission (1) (2) (3) (4) (1) ABl. L 170 vom 3. 8. 1970, S. 2. (2) ABl. L 270 vom 14. 12. 1970, S. 1. (3) ABl. L 108 vom 27. 4. 1999, S. 20. L 207/14 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften 6. 8. 1999 ANHANG BESTIMMUNG VON LASALOCID-NATRIUM Monocarborylsäure-Polyether-Natriumsalz gebildet von Streptomyces lasaliensis 1. Zweck ünd Anwendungsbereich Diese Methode dient der Bestimmung von Lasalocid-Natrium in Futtermitteln und Vormischungen. Die Nachweis- grenze beträgt 5 mg/kg, die Bestimmungsgrenze 30 mg/kg. 2. Prinzip Lasalocid-Natrium wird aus der Probe mit angesäuertem Methanol extrahiert und durch Umkehrphasen-Hochlei- stungsflüssigchromatographie (RP-HPLC) unter Verwendung eines Fluoreszenzdetektors Detektors bestimmt. 3. Reagenzien 3. 1. Kaliumdihydrogenphosphat (KH PO 2 4 ) 3. 2. Orthophosphorsäure, w = 85 % 3. 3. Orthophosphorsäurelösung, σ = 20 23,5 ml Orthophosphorsäure (3. 2) werden mit Wasser auf 100 ml aufgefüllt 3. 4. 6-Methyl-2-heptylamin (1,5-Dimethylhexylamin), w = 99 % 3. 5. Methanol, HPLC-Qualität 3. 6. Salzsäure, ρ 20 1,19 g/ml 3. 7. Phosphatpufferlösung, c = 0,01 mol/l PO 1,36 g KH (3. 1) werden in 500 ml Wasser (3. 11) gelöst, 3,0 ml Orthophosphorsäure (3. 2) und 10,0 ml 6- 2 Methyl-2-Heptylamin (3. 4) hinzugefügt. Den pH-Wert mit Orthophosphorsäurelösung (3. 3) auf pH 4,0 einstellen und mit Wasser (3. 11 ) auf 1 000 ml auffüllen 4 3. 8. Angesäuertes Methanol 5,0 ml Salzsäure (3. 6) werden in einen 1 000-ml-Meßkolben gegeben und mit Methanol (3. 5) bis zur Marke aufgefüllt und gemischt. Diese Lösung muß vor jeder Verwendung frisch hergestellt werden 3. 9. Mobile Phase für die HPLC: Phosphatpuffer-Methanollösung 5 + 95 (V + V) 5 ml der Phosphatpufferlösung (3. 7) werden mit 95 ml Methanol (3. 5) vermischt 3. 10. Lasalocid-Natrium-Standard-Substanz, rein, C Streptomyces lasaliensis), E763 34 H 53 O Na (Monocarborylsäure-Polyether-Natriumsalz gebildet von 8 3. 10. 1. Lasalocid-Natrium-Standard-Stammlösung, 500 µg/ml 50 mg Lasalocid-Natrium (3. 10) werden auf 0,1 mg genau in einen 100-ml-Meßkolben eingewogen und in angesäuertem Methanol (3. 8) gelöst. Es wird mit demselben Lösungsmittel zur Marke aufgefüllt und gemischt. Diese Lösung muß vor Gebrauch frisch bereitet werden. 3. 10. 2. Lasalocid-Natrium-Standard, Lösung, 50 µg/ml 10,0 ml der Lasalocid-Natrium-Stammlösung (3. 10. 1) werden in einen 100-ml-Meßkolben pipettiert, es wird zur Marke mit angesäuertem Methanol (3. 8) aufgefüllt und gemischt. Diese Lösung muß vor Gebrauch frisch bereitet werden. 3. 10. 3. Kalibrierlösungen 1,0, 2,0, 4,0, 5,0 und 10,0 ml der Lasalocid-Natrium-Standard-Lösung (3. 10. 2) werden jeweils in einen 50-ml- Meßkolben gegeben, es wird zur Marke mit dem angesäuerten Methanol (3. 8) aufgefüllt und gemischt. Diese Kalibrierlösungen enthalten jeweils 1,0, 2,0, 4,0, 5,0 und 10,0 µg Lasalocid-Natrium pro ml. Diese Lösungen müssen vor Gebrauch frisch zubereitet werden. 3. 11. Wasser, HPLC-Qualität 6. 8. 1999 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 207/15 4. 4. 1. 4. 2. 4. 3. Geräte Ultraschallbad (oder Schüttel-Wasserbad) mit Temperatursteuerung Membranfilter, 0,45 µm Porengröße HPLC-System mit Injektionssystem für Volumina von 20 µl. 4. 3. 1. Trennsäule 125 mm x 4 mm, mit Umkehrphase C18, 5 µm, Fluoreszenzdetektor oder vergleichbare Säule 4. 3. 2. Fluoreszenzdetektor mit variabler Einstellung für Anregungs- und Emissionswellenlänge 5. Durchführung 5. 1. Allgemeines 5. 1. 1. Blindprobe Für die Durchführung des Wiederfindungsversuchs (5. 1. 2) sollte eine Blindprobe untersucht werden um zu prüfen, daß weder Lasalocid-Natrium noch Störsubstanzen vorhanden sind. Die Blindprobe sollte ähnlich zusam- mengesetzt sein wie die zu untersuchende Probe und Lasalocid-Natrium oder Störsubstanzen sollten nicht nachgewiesen werden. 5. 1. 2. Wiederfindungsversuch Die Wiederfindungsrate wird ermittelt, indem eine Blindprobe untersucht wird, die mit einer Lasalocid-Natrium- Menge angereichert wurde, die der in der Probe vorhandenen Menge entspricht. Um auf einen Gehalt von 100 mg/kg anzureichern, werden 10,0 ml der Standard-Stammlösung (3. 10. 1) in einen 250-ml-Erlenmeyer- Kolben überführt und die Lösung wird auf ca. 0,5 ml eingedampft. Dann werden 50 g der Blindprobe zuge- geben. Es wird gründlich gemischt, für 10 Minuten stehengelassen und nochmals mehrfach gemischt, bevor mit der Extraktion (5. 2) begonnen wird. Ist eine der zu untersuchenden Probe ähnliche Blindprobe nicht verfügbar (siehe 5. 1. 1), so kann ein Wiederfin- dungsversuch mit Hilfe des Additionsverfahrens durchgeführt werden. In diesem Fall wird die zu untersuchende Probe mit einer Lasalocid-Natrium-Menge angereichert, die der bereits in der Probe vorhandenen Menge entspricht. Diese Probe wird zusammen mit der nicht angereicherten Probe untersucht und die Wiederfindungs- rate kann durch Differenzbildung ermittelt werden. 5. 2. Extraktion 5. 2. 1. Futtermittel Zwischen 5 und 10 g der Probe werden auf 0,01 g genau in einen 250-ml-Erlenmeyer-Kolben mit Stopfen eingewogen und 100,0 ml angesäuertes Methanol (3. 8) mit einer Pipette hinzugefügt. Der Stopfen wird lose aufgesetzt und der Inhalt zum Dispergieren geschüttelt. Der Kolben wird sodann 20 Minuten in ein Ultraschallbad (4. 1) mit einer Temperatur von ca. 40 °C gestellt, dann entnommen und auf Raumtemperatur abkühlen gelassen. Der Kolben wird etwa eine Stunde stehengelassen, bis die Schwebstoffe sich abgesetzt haben, dann wird ein Aliquot über ein 0,45-µm-Membranfilter (4. 2) in ein geeignetes Gefäß filtriert. Diese Lösung wird für die HPLC-Bestimmung (5. 3) verwendet. 5. 2. 2. Vormischungen Rund 2 g der nicht gemahlenen Vormischung werden auf 0,001 g genau in einen 250-ml-Meßkolben gegeben. Es werden 100,0 ml angesäuertes Methanol (3. 8) hinzugefügt und der Inhalt zum Dispergieren geschüttelt. Der Kolben wird 20 Minuten in ein Ultraschallbad (4. 1) mit einer Temperatur von ca. 40 °C gestellt, dann entnommen und auf Raumtemperatur abkühlen gelassen. Es wird mit angesäuertem Methanol (3. 8) zur Marke aufgefüllt und sorgfältig gemischt. Der Kolben wird etwa eine Stunde stehengelassen, bis die Schwebstoffe sich abgesetzt haben, dann wird ein Aliquot über ein 0,45-µm-Membranfilter (4. 2) filtriert. Ein Aliquot des klaren Filtrats wird mit angesäuertem Methanol (3. 8) verdünnt, es soll eine Lösung mit eine Konzentration von etwa 4 µg/ml Lasalocid-Natrium erhalten werden. Diese Lösung wird für die HPLC-Bestimmung (5. 3) verwendet. 5. 3. HPLC-Bestimmung 5. 3. 1. Parameter Die folgenden Angaben sind Richtwerte, andere Bedingungen können verwendet werden, sofern sie zu vergleich- baren Ergebnissen führen: HPLC-Trennsäule (4. 3. 1): Mobile Phase (3. 9): Flußrate: Fluoreszenzdetektor: — Anregungswellenlänge: — Emissionswellenlänge: Einspritzvolumen: 125 mm × 4 mm, Umkehrphase C18, 5 µm Mischung aus Phosphatpufferlösung (3. 7) und Methanol (3. 5), 5 + 95 (V + V) 1,2 ml/min. 310 nm 419 nm 20 µl L 207/16 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften 6. 8. 1999 Die Stabilität des chromatographischen Systems wird überprüft, indem die Kalibrierlösung (3. 10. 3), die 4,0 µg/ml enthält, mehrmals eingespritzt wird, bis konstante Peakhöhen (/flächen) und Retentionszeiten erhalten werden. 5. 3. 2. Erstellung der Kalibrierkurve Jede Kalibrierlösung (3. 10. 3) wird mehrmals eingespritzt und es werden die mittleren Peakhöhen (/flächen) für die indem die mittleren Peakhöhen (/ einzelnen Konzentrationen gemessen. Es wird eine Kalibrierkurve erstellt, flächen) auf der Ordinate und die dazugehörigen Konzentrationen in µg/ml auf der Abszisse aufgetragen werden. 5. 3. 3. Probenlösung Die nach 5. 2. 1 bzw. 5. 2. 2 gewonnenen Probenextrakte werden mehrmals eingespritzt, wobei dasselbe Volumen wie für die Einspritzung der Kalibrierlösungen verwendet wird. Die mittlere Peakhöhe (/fläche) der Lasalocid- Natrium-Peaks wird ermittelt. 6. Berechnung der Ergebnisse Aus der mittleren Peakhöhe (/fläche) der Probenlösung (5. 3. 3) wird anhand der Kalibrierkurve die Konzentration an Lasalocid-Natrium (µg/ml) bestimmt. 6. 1. Futtermittel Der Gehalt an Lasalocid-Natrium w in mg/kg der Probe wird nach folgender Formel berechnet: w = β. V 1 m dabei ist: [mg/kg] β = Lasalocid-Natrium-Konzentration der Probenlösung (5. 2. 1 ) in µg/ml Vi m = Probeneinwaage in g. = Volumen der Proben-Extraktionslösung gemäß 5. 2. 1 in ml (d. h. 100) 6. 2. Vormischungen Der Gehalt an Lasalocid-Natrium w in mg/kg der Probe wird nach folgender Formel berechnet: w = β. V 2. f m [mg/kg] dabei ist: β = Lasalocid-Natrium-Konzentration der Probenlösung (5. 2. 2) in µg/ml V2 f = Verdünnungsfaktor gemäß 5. 2. 2 = Volumen des Probenextrakts gemäß 5. 2. 2 in ml (d. h. 250) m = Probeneinwaage in g. 7. Überprüfung der Ergebnisse 7. 1. Identität Nachweis- und Bestimmungsverfahren, denen die Fluoreszenzdetektion zugrunde liegt, sind im Vergleich zur UV-Detektion weniger interferenzanfällig. Die Identität des Analyten kann durch Co-Chromatographie bestätigt werden. 7. 1. 1. Co-Chromatographie Ein Probenextrakt (5. 2. 1 oder 5. 2. 2) wird mit einer entsprechenden Menge Kalibrierlösung (3. 10. 3) aufgestockt. Die zugesetzte Lasalocid-Natrium-Menge sollte dem Lasalocid-Natrium-Gehalt des Probenextraktes entsprechen. Unter Berücksichtigung der zugesetzten Lasalocid-Natrium-Menge und der Verdünnung des Extraktes darf nur die Höhe des Lasalocid-Natrium-Peaks entsprechend vergrößert sein. Die Peakbreite in halber Höhe sollte nicht mehr als ± 10 % von der ursprünglichen Peakbreite abweichen, die sich bei dem nicht angereicherten Probenextrakt ergibt. 7. 2. Wiederholbarkeit Die Differenz zwischen den Ergebnissen zweier paralleler Bestimmungen bei ein und derselben Probe darf folgende Werte nicht überschreiten: — bei Lasalocid-Natrium-Gehalten zwischen 30 mg/kg und 100 mg/kg 15 % des höheren Resultats; — bei Lasalocid-Natrium-Gehalten zwischen 100 mg/kg und 200 mg/kg 15 mg/kg; — bei Lasalocid-Natrium-Gehalten von mehr als 200 mg/kg 7,5 % des höheren Resultats. 7. 3. Wiederfindungsrate Bei einer aufgestockten angereicherten (Blind-)Probe sollte die Wiederfindungsrate bei Futtermitteln mindestens 80 % betragen. Bei angereicherten Vormischungsproben sollte die Wiederfindungsrate mindestens 90 % betragen. 8. Ergebnisse eines Ringversuchs In einem Ringversuch (1) wurden zwei Vormischungen (Proben 1 und 2) und fünf Futtermittel (Proben 3 bis 7) in 12 Laboratorien untersucht. Jede Probe wurde doppelt analysiert. Die Ergebnisse sind in nachstehender Tabelle zusammengefaßt: (1) Analyst, 1995, 120, 2175-2180. 6. 8. 1999 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 207/17 Probe 1 Probe 2 Probe 3 Probe 4 Probe 5 Hühner- vormischung Truthühner- vormischung Truthühner- Pellets Hühner- krümelfutter Trut- hühnerfutter Probe 6 Geflügel- futter A Probe 7 Geflügel- futter B 12 23 12 23 12 23 5 050 16 200 76,5 107 408 2,12 2,52 286 883 5,66 5,45 1,71 2,24 3,85 5,03 12 23 78,4 2,23 2,84 7,32 9,34 12 23 92,9 2,27 2,44 5,29 5,69 12 23 48,3 1,93 4,00 3,47 7,18 12 23 32,6 1,75 5,37 3,49 10,70 5 000* 16 000* 80* 105* 120* 50+ 35+ L N Mittelwert [mg/kg] sr [mg/kg] CV r [%] s R [mg/kg] CV R [%] Sollgehalt [mg/kg] = Standardabweichung der Wiederholbarkeit. = Standardabweichung der Vergleichbarkeit. L = Anzahl Laboratorien. n = Anzahl Einzelwerte. sr sR = Variationskoeffizient der Wiederholbarkeit in %. CVr CVR = Variationskoeffizient der Vergleichbarkeit in %. * Gehalt nach Angabe des Herstellers. + im Laboratorium zubereitetes Futter