title: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1826/1999 of 23 August 1999 amending Regulation (EC) No 929/1999 imposing provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of farmed Atlantic salmon originating in Norway with regard to certain exporters, imposing provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of such salmon with regard to certain exporters, amending Decision 97/634/EC accepting undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidies proceedings concerning imports of such salmon and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 772/1999 imposing definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of such salmon

eurovoc_concepts:
Norway
anti-dumping duty
export subsidy
import
monetary compensatory amount
sea fish

formats: html pdf print

text: 24. 8. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 223/3 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1826/1999 of 23 August 1999 amending Regulation (EC) No 929/1999 imposing provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of farmed Atlantic salmon originating in Norway with regard to certain ex- porters, imposing provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of such salmon with regard to certain exporters, amending Decision 97/634/EC accepting undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidies proceedings concerning imports of such salmon and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 772/1999 imposing definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of such salmon THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 905/98 (2), and in particular Article 8 thereof, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community (3), and in particular Article 13 thereof, After consulting the Advisory Committee, Whereas: A. PREVIOUS PROCEDURE (1) (2) (3) On 31 August 1996, the Commission announced, by two separate notices published in the Official Journal of the European Communities, the initiation of an anti- dumping proceeding (4) as well as an anti-subsidy proceeding (5) in respect of imports of farmed Atlantic salmon originating in Norway. The Commission sought and verified all information that it deemed necessary for the purpose of its definitive findings. As a result of this examination, it was estab- lished that definitive anti-dumping and countervailing measures should be adopted in order to eliminate the injurious effects of dumping and subsidisation. All inter- ested parties were informed of the results of the invest- igation and were given the opportunity to comment thereon. the Commission adopted On 26 September 1997, Decision 97/634/EC (6), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 929/1999 (7), accepting undertakings offered in connection with the two abovementioned proceedings (1) OJ L 56, 6. 3. 1996, p. 1. (2) OJ L 128, 30. 4. 1998, p. 18. (3) OJ L 288, 21. 10. 1997, p. 1. (4) OJ C 253, 31. 8. 1996, p. 18. (5) OJ C 253, 31. 8. 1996, p. 20. (6) OJ L 267, 30. 9. 1997, p. 81. (7) OJ L 115, 4. 5. 1999, p. 13. (4) (5) (6) (7) from the exporters listed in the Annex to the Decision and terminating the investigations in their respect. On the same day, the Council, by Regulations (EC) No 1890/97 (8) and 1891/97 (9) imposed anti-dumping and farmed Atlantic countervailing duties on imports of salmon originating in Norway. farmed Atlantic salmon exported by companies from which an undertaking had been accepted were exempted from that duty pursuant to Article 1(2) of those Regulations. Imports of The abovementioned Regulations set out the definitive findings and conclusions on all aspects of the investiga- tions. The form of the duties having been reviewed, Regulations (EC) No 1890/97 and 1891/97 were replaced by Regulation (EC) No 772/1999, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1003/1999 (10). B. PROVISIONAL MEASURES IMPOSED BY REGULA- TION (EC) No 929/1999 (Recital 29 et seq) The text of the undertakings provides that failure to submit a quarterly report of all sales transactions to the first unrelated customer in the Community within a prescribed time limit (except in case of force majeure), would be construed as a violation of the undertaking, as would non-compliance with the obligation to sell the different presentations of the product concerned (i. e. gutted, head-on, etc. ) on the Community market at prices which are not below the minimum import prices foreseen in the undertaking. For the third quarter of 1998, one Norwegian company did not present a report within the prescribed time limit. For the same quarter, the Commission had reason to believe that another Norwegian exporter had sold the product concerned to the Community market at a price which was below the price foreseen in its undertaking. Two other Norwegian companies appeared to have made misleading declarations in their quarterly reports as to the identity of the exporter and the identity and nature of the sales reported. (8) OJ L 267, 3. 9. 1997, p. 1. Regulation repealed by Regulation (EC) No 772/1999 OJ No L 101, 16. 4. 1999, p. 1. (9) OJ L 267, 30. 9. 1997, p. 19, repealed by Regulation (EC) No 772/ 1999. (10) OJ L 123, 13. 5. 1999, p. 19. L 223/4 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 24. 8. 1999 (8) (9) The Commission therefore had reason to believe that these four companies had breached the terms of their undertakings and, consequently, by Regulation (EC) No 929/1999 imposed provisional anti-dumping and coun- tervailing duties on imports of farmed Atlantic Salmon ex 0302 12 00, falling ex 0304 10 13, ex 0303 22 00 and ex 0304 20 13 originating in Norway and exported by the companies. within codes CN By the same Regulation (hereinafter referred to as ‘the provisional duty Regulation’), the Commission deleted the four companies concerned from the Annex to Decision 97/634/EC, which lists the companies from which undertakings are accepted. C. PROCEDURE FOLLOWING IMPOSITION OF PROVI- SIONAL DUTIES (10) All four Norwegian companies subject to the provisional duties received disclosure in writing concerning the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which these provisional duties were imposed. They were also given an opportunity to submit comments and request a hearing. all of the Norwegian companies (11) Within the time limit set in the provisional duty Regula- tion, concerned submitted comments in writing. Following receipt of these written submissions, the Commission sought and information it deemed necessary for the examined all purpose of a definitive determination on the apparent violations. Of the four companies subject to the provi- sional measures, one requested (and was granted) a hearing. (12) The oral and written comments submitted by the inter- ested parties were considered and, where appropriate, the definitive findings have been changed accordingly. D. DEFINITIVE FINDINGS — REPEAL OF PROVISIONAL DUTIES FOR ONE COMPANY (13) With regard to the Norwegian exporter, Atlantic Seafood A/S, whose quarterly sales report was received by the Commission after the prescribed date, the company stated that, at the time when the report should have been sent, it had encountered technical problems with its electronic mail system which were beyond its control. Evidence was provided from the company's ‘internet provider’ which confirmed this submission. (17) (14) Having examined the additional evidence put forward by the company subsequent to the imposition of the provi- sional measures, the Commission is satisfied that the company was prevented from sending its report in time for reasons which were beyond its control. Accordingly, is considered that Regulation (EC) No 929/1999 it should be repealed in so far as this company is concerned and any provisional duties collected should be released. E. DEFINITIVE FINDINGS — VIOLATION OF UNDER- TAKINGS BY THREE COMPANIES imposed against (15) Another company, Myre Sjømat AS, had provisional measures it by Regulation (EC) 929/1999 due to an apparent violation of the minimum import price. Subsequent to the imposition of the provi- sional measures, the company claimed that some of the transactions declared on the quarterly sales report for the period in question as ‘Presentation g’ (fillets or fillet portions), with sales prices below the minimum import price for this presentation, were in fact ‘Presentation e’ (offcuts or trimmings). It was submitted that the sales prices of these offcuts or trimmings were above the minimum import price for ‘Presentation e’ and that no violation of the undertaking had occurred. It was also claimed that another sale reported below the minimum import price as ‘Presentation g’ was not a commercial sale but a low-priced sample of salmon fillets. (16) The Commission requested the company to provide supporting documentation for these claims, which it did. With regard to those sales originally declared as ‘Presen- tation g’ but which were later claimed to be ‘Presentation e’, the Commission is satisfied that the consignments in question were indeed offcuts or trimmings and that the minimum import price for these sales had been respected. With regard to the sale of a sample at a low price, it should be noted that whilst the undertaking provides for sufficient flexibility to allow such sales to be made below the minimum import price, they do not fall outside its scope. Accordingly, the low-priced sale in question has to be included in the quarterly average sales price of the company for the presentation concerned. On this basis, the quarterly average price of sales of ‘Presentation g’ during the quarter concerned was significantly below the applicable minimum import price. It should also be noted that, in addition to the violation of the minimum import price during the third quarter of 1998, the report of Myre Sjømat AS for this quarter was received late. The reports for the two subsequent quar- ters were also received late or were not received at all. No satisfactory explanations were received concerning these additional reporting violations. In view of all the above, it is concluded that definitive duties should be imposed against this company. the exporter within the meaning of Brødrene Eilertsen A/S, one of the two companies which appeared to have made misleading declarations as to the identity of the undertaking and the identity and nature of the goods the company was indeed the reported, claimed that ‘exporter’ and that the Norwegian company on whose behalf Brødrene Eilertsen A/S appeared to have been acting (and which, it was understood, had neither an export licence issued by the Norwegian authorities nor an undertaking with the Commission), was in fact Eilert- sen's agent. Brødrene Eilertsen A/S argued that it should be regarded as the ‘exporter’ as it dealt with customs authorities, freight hauliers and had to arrange its own customs duty payment/credit facilities in Norway and the Community. 24. 8. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 223/5 (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) transactions The company confirmed, however, that the money-flow did not match the purchase/resale invoice-flow and that the other Norwegian for most export company obtained orders in the Community, arranging the took responsibility for financing of the sale and, most importantly, received payment for the shipment direct from the customers. Brødrene Eilertsen A/S argued that this was typical busi- ness practice and was not done with a view to violating the minimum import price or the undertaking. from customers The Commission has considered all the arguments put forward, however, none of these detract from the fact that the company issued invoices to unrelated customers in the Community, but never received payment for those invoices. It is considered that this type of business prac- tice is incompatible with the obligations imposed by the undertaking as the company is unable to ensure that the invoice amount was actually paid by its customer and, it follows, that it was not below the minimum import price level. Consequently, it could not control whether the actual prices achieved did indeed respect the terms of its undertaking as far as the minimum import prices were concerned. For these reasons, Brødrene Eilertsen A/S cannot be considered as an exporter within the meaning of the undertaking. the underlying financial It also follows that, in submitting quarterly undertaking reports of ‘sales’ to the Community which can only be regarded as hypothetical (as they simply reflected the amounts stated on the invoices and not necessarily, contrary to the requirements of the undertaking, the real value of the company misled the Commission with regard to its true function and capability for respecting the undertaking and also as to the true nature and price level of the sales. Indeed, if these facts had been known to the Commis- sion, they would have led to the rejection of the offer of an undertaking at the outset, or to the withdrawal of acceptance of the undertaking at a much earlier stage. transactions), would receive from the importer the difference between the cost of goods supplied from the related company in Norway and the resale price to the importer, thus saving on bank costs. Sales sourced in this way constituted a significant proportion of the total exports of Arne Mathisen A/S. (23) The company stated that it was acting as exporter because it acquired legal title to the goods, accepted the commercial risks and arranged for transport to the Community. Arne Mathisen A/S also argued that receipt of only the difference between the purchase and resale prices was standard business practice. The company the resale prices of goods further purchased from Arne Mathisen A/S by the Community importer in question had been verified during an on- spot verification at the importer's premises in November 1998 and were found to have been above the minimum import price. It was argued that the sales in question of Arne Mathisen A/S had not, therefore, caused any injury ultimately to the Community industry. submitted that (24) It also submitted that it had ceased sourcing salmon from the company in Norway which is related to its customer in the Community as soon as an amendment was made at the end of November 1998 to the under- taking (and corresponding amendment to the applicable expressly prevented Norwegian legislation) which salmon being sourced in this way from, inter alia, Norwegian exporters which do not hold undertakings. from the Community customer, (25) With regard to the arguments concerning the receipt of a ‘net’ amount the considerations and conclusions of the Commission set out above at recital 19 et seq also apply to Arne Mathisen A/S. It too is considered to have sent hypothet- ical sales reports, and to have misled the Commission as to its true function and capability for respecting the undertaking. For an undertaking to be considered acceptable, the Commission must be satisfied that it can be effectively monitored, which is something it clearly cannot do when a company such as Brødrene Eilertsen A/S has no the final price of control exported salmon paid by in the customer Community directly to the supplier in Norway. Con- sequently, the acceptance of the undertaking offered by Brødrene Eilertsen A/S should be withdrawn and defin- itive duties should be imposed. (or even knowledge) of the The other company which appeared to have made misleading declarations as to the identity of the exporter, Arne Mathisen A/S, confirmed that with regard to one particular supplier in Norway, an exporter without an undertaking, its money-flow did not reflect the paper- flow of purchase and resale invoices. It had a commer- cial arrangement with this Norwegian supplier and its sole customer in the Community (which was related to the Norwegian supplier) whereby Arne Mathisen A/S (26) In this regard, as long as it had no control over the constitutive price element, it is irrelevant whether Arne Mathisen A/S may have taken responsibility for ancillary obligations concerning its sales. In addition, it should be noted that, contrary to what it had stated earlier, Arne Mathisen A/S admitted that it was fully aware of the relationship between the Norwegian supplier concerned and its sole customer in the Community. It follows, therefore, that Arne Mathisen A/S must have known that prices and money-flows between those two companies were only of a notional character as they were, in essence, transfer prices between related parties. (27) As concerns the verification visit of the Commission to the unrelated customer in the Community, the argument that the resale prices of this company may have been above the minimum import price and therefore at non- injurious levels is considered to be a completely different issue to the one of whether Arne Mathisen A/S had respected its undertaking or not. L 223/6 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 24. 8. 1999 (28) that Indeed, to establish, as argued by Arne Mathisen A/S, that these resale prices had no negative effects, it would also be necessary to extend the investigation to the related parties of importer in Norway and the Community. Furthermore, such a finding is not required by Article 8(9) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 in order to establish a violation, nor for withdrawing the acceptance of the undertaking. Finally, it is irrelevant whether Arne Mathisen A/S abandoned the practise of obtaining salmon from the Norwegian supplier which was related to its customer in the Community once, as mentioned above in recital 24, this method of sourcing was blocked in November 1998. At that time it had already violated its undertaking for more than five consecutive reporting quarters. Consequently, the acceptance of the under- taking offered by Arne Mathisen A/S should be with- drawn and definitive duties should be imposed. (34) (35) repeal (29) All the interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to either the provisional measures imposed against them and reinstate them on the list of companies from which undertakings are accepted, or confirm the withdrawal of the Commission's acceptance of their undertaking and to recommend the imposition of definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of provisional duties. The companies were also granted a period within which to make representations subsequent to this disclosure. Comments received were taken into account where appropriate. (30) In parallel to this Regulation, the Commission is submit- ting a proposal for a Council Regulation imposing defin- itive anti-dumping and countervailing duties on farmed Atlantic salmon originating in Norway and exported by the three companies which remain subject to the provi- sional duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 929/1999, namely Myre Sjømat AS, Brødrene Eilertsen A/S and Arne Mathisen A/S. F. NEW VIOLATION CASES (31) As mentioned above, all exporters from which undertak- ings have been accepted are required, inter alia, to submit quarterly reports to the Commission of their sales of the product concerned to the Community and to respect minimum prices for the various presentations of the product concerned. (32) While monitoring the reports relating to the fourth quarter of 1998, it appeared that one exporter, Norfra Eksport AS, had made sales for one presentation of fish on the Community market below the minimum price foreseen in the undertaking. In reply, the company stated that it had not realised that it was obliged to respect the minimum price for each presentation separately, but rather that it could com- pensate sales below the minimum price in one presenta- tion with sales above the minimum price in another. Moreover, the company stated that the same approach had been applied in its sales report for the third quarter of 1997, however, at that time, the Commission had not advised it that anything untoward had occurred. Accord- ingly, the company considered that its interpretation of approach the concerning sales prices was correct. the undertaking and its terms of The Commission cannot accept the first argument as it considers that the text of the undertaking signed by the company makes it absolutely clear that minimum prices are to be respected by presentation. In addition, pre- formatted computer files have been distributed to ex- porters as part of the reporting procedure. These files are also clearly geared to presenting (and checking) prices by presentation, and not by an average of all presentations. (36) As concerns the submission that the Commission had failed to advise the company in the past that it had misinterpreted the undertaking, the Commission, in May 1998, whilst clarifying a number of technical issues raised by the Norwegian Seafood Export Council, also emphasised that the minimum prices would be checked for each presenta- tion. It was confirmed that Norfra Eksport AS had received a copy of this letter. the respect of is noted that it (37) In addition, while monitoring the reports relating to the first quarter of 1999, it appeared that another exporter, Janas AS, had made sales for one presentation of fish on the Community market below the minimum price fore- seen in the undertaking. The company was given an opportunity to correct any possible clerical mistakes made in the processing of the report and also to comment on any erroneous assessment thereof made by the Commission. No satisfactory answer was received, from the company within the deadline set however, its which caused the Commission to consider preliminary evaluation was incorrect. that (38) Also with regard to the first quarter of 1999, no sales report was received within the prescribed time limit from another exporter, Vie de France Norway AS, despite the fact that a reminder was sent to the company 24 hours before the deadline. The company was subse- quently given an opportunity to advise the Commission of any reasons which may have prevented it from sending its report within the time limit, however, no explanation has been received from the company in this respect. (33) The company was given an opportunity to correct any possible clerical mistakes made in the processing of the report and also to comment on any erroneous assess- ment thereof made by the Commission. (39) Accordingly, there are reasons to believe that the under- Janas AS and Vie de France takings of Norfra AS, Norway AS are being breached. 24. 8. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 223/7 G. IMPOSITION MEASURES FOLLOWING APPARENT BREACHES OF THE UNDER- TAKINGS PROVISIONAL OF (40) Having regard to the above, it is considered that pending further investigation of these apparent violations, provi- sional duties be imposed against these three companies. (41) (42) In accordance with Article 8(10) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 and Article 13(10) of Regulation (EC) No 2067/97, the rate of the anti-dumping and counter- vailing duty respectively must be established on the basis of the best information available. In this regard and in view of recital 107 of Regulation (EC) No 1890/97 and recital 149 of Regulation (EC) No 1891/97, it is considered appropriate that the provi- sional anti-dumping and countervailing duty rates be set at the level, and in the form, imposed by Regulation (EC) No 772/1999. H. FINAL CONSIDERATION CONCERNING IMPOSITION OF PROVISIONAL DUTIES (43) In the interest of sound administration, a period should be fixed in which interested parties may make known their views in writing and request a hearing. (47) (48) (49) Since the exporters have offered to provide the Commis- sion with regular and detailed information on their exports to the Community, the undertakings can be monitored effectively by the Commission. is concluded that it The undertakings offered by these companies are there- fore considered acceptable. The companies have been informed of the essential facts and considerations upon the undertaking is based. The which acceptance of Advisory Committee was consulted and has raised no objections. Pursuant, therefore, to Article 2 of Regula- tion (EC) No 772/1999, the Annex to that Regulation should be amended so as to grant exemption from payment of anti-dumping and countervailing duties to these companies. J. CHANGE OF NAME Finally, two other Norwegian exporters, Herøy Filetfab- rikk AS and SL Fjordgruppen AS, advised the Commis- sion that the names of the companies had been changed to Atlantis Filetfabrikk AS and Fjord Seafood Leines AS respectively. The Commission has therefore verified and confirmed that there were no changes to the corporate structure which warranted a more detailed examination of the appropriateness of the companies maintaining their undertakings. Accordingly, these companies should be amended in the Annex to Decision 97/634/EC. the names of I. NEW EXPORTERS K. AMENDMENT OF THE ANNEX TO DECISION 97/634/EC Following the imposition of definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties, several Norwegian companies have made themselves known to the Commission claiming to be new exporters and have offered undertakings. (50) (44) (45) four regard, In this such companies, F. Uhrenholt Seafood Norway AS, Mesan Seafood AS, Polaris Seafood AS and Scanfish AS, demonstrated that they had not exported the product concerned to the Community during the investigation period which led to the current anti-dumping and countervailing duties (hereinafter ‘the original investigation period’). The companies also showed that they were not related to any of the com- panies in Norway which are subject to the anti-dumping and countervailing duties. companies provided evidence that they had either exported the product concerned to the Community after the original investigation period, or had entered into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export a significant amount of the product concerned to the Community. Finally, the (46) The undertakings offered are identical in terms to those previously offered by other Norwegian companies exporting farmed Atlantic salmon originating in Norway and it is considered that acceptance of such undertakings from these exporters will be sufficient to remove the effects of injurious dumping and subsidisation. The Annex to Decision 97/634/EC accepting undertak- ings in the context of the present anti-dumping and anti-subsidies proceedings should be amended to take account of the reinstatement of the undertaking given by Atlantic Seafood A/S in respect of which the provisional duties should be repealed, the undertakings accepted from F. Uhrenholt Seafood Norway AS, Mesan Seafood AS, Polaris Seafood AS and Scanfish AS, and the change of name of Herøy Filetfabrikk AS to Atlantis Filetfabrikk AS and of SL Fjordgruppen AS to Fjord Seafood Leines AS. (51) For the sake of clarity, an updated version of this Annex should be published herewith, showing the exporters whose undertakings remain in force. L. AMENDMENT OF REGULATION (EC) No 929/1999 (52) As mentioned previously, by Regulation (EC) No 772/1999, the Council amended the form of the anti- dumping duty to a variable duty based on minimum import prices for each of the different presentations of farmed Atlantic salmon originating in Norway. In this regard, new Taric codes were created for each of these presentations. L 223/8 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 24. 8. 1999 (53) By Regulation (EC) No 929/1999, provisional measures were imposed against the four companies listed in Annex II to that Regulation. However, Article 2(1)(a) of that Regulation still refers, incorrectly, to the Taric codes which were replaced by Regulation (EC) No 772/1999. In addition, references to the Taric additional code 8900 in Article 2(2)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 929/1999 are superfluous. An amendment to these Articles in Regulation (EC) No 929/1999 is therefore necessary, HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 1. The provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duties imposed against Atlantic Seafood A/S (UT No 24, Taric addi- tional code 8122) by Regulation (EC) No 929/1999 in relation to farmed (other than wild) Atlantic salmon originating in Norway falling within CN codes ex 0302 12 00 (Taric codes: 0302 12 00*21, and 0302 12 00*29), ex 0303 22 00 (Taric codes: 0303 22 00*21, 0303 22 00*29), 0303 22 00*22, and ex 0304 10 13 0304 10 13*29) codes: 0304 20 13*21and 0304 20 13*29), are hereby repealed. 0303 22 00*23 (Taric codes: and and 0304 10 13*21 0302 12 00*22, 0302 12 00*23 ex 0304 20 13 (Taric Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 929/1999 is hereby 2. replaced by Annex I to the present Regulation. 3. Any amounts secured from Atlantic Seafood A/S by way the provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duties of imposed by Regulation (EC) No 929/1999 shall be released. 2. (a) The rate of the countervailing duty applicable to the net free-at-Community frontier price, before duty, shall be 3,8 %. free-at-Community-frontier price, (b) The rate of the anti-dumping duty applicable to the net free-at-Community frontier price, before duty, shall be EUR 0,32 per kilogram net product weight. However, if the including the countervailing and anti-dumping duties, is less than the relevant minimum price set out in paragraph 3, the anti-dumping duty to be collected shall be the difference between free-at- Community frontier price, including the countervailing duty. that minimum price and the For the purpose of paragraph 2, the following minimum 3. prices shall apply per kilogram net product weight: Presentation of salmon Minimum price Euro/kg net product weight Taric code Whole fish, fresh or chilled 2,925 0302 12 00*21 Gutted, head-on, fresh or chilled 3,25 0302 12 00*22 Gutted, headless, fresh or chilled 3,65 0302 12 00*23 fresh or chilled, including 3,65 0302 12 00*29 Other, ‘steaks’ Whole fish, frozen 2,925 0303 22 00*21 Gutted, head-on, frozen 3,25 0303 22 00*22 Gutted, headless, frozen 3,65 0303 22 00*23 Article 2 Other, frozen, including ‘steaks’ 3,65 0303 22 00*29 codes: codes: 1. (a) Provisional countervailing and anti-dumping duties are hereby imposed on imports of farmed (other than wild) Atlantic salmon falling within CN codes ex 0302 12 00 (Taric 0302 12 00*22, 0302 12 00*21, 0302 12 00*23 and 0302 12 00*29), ex 0303 22 00 (Taric 0303 22 00*22, 0303 22 00*21, 0303 22 00*23 and 0303 22 00*29), ex 0304 10 13 codes: 0304 10 13*21 and 0304 10 13*29) (Taric codes: 0304 20 13*21 and ex 0304 10 13 (Taric 0304 10 13*29) codes: 0304 20 13*21 and 0304 20 13*29) originating in Norway and exported by the companies listed in Annex II to the present Regulation. and ex 0304 20 13 (Taric Whole fish fillets, more than 300 g each, fresh or chilled 5,19 0304 10 13*21 Other fish fillets or fillet portions, 300 g or less each, fresh or chilled 6,55 0304 10 13*29 Whole fish fillets, more than 300 g each, frozen 5,19 0304 20 13*21 Other fish fillets or fillet portions, weighing 300 g or less each, frozen 6,55 0304 20 13*29 codes: (b) These duties shall not apply to wild Atlantic salmon (Taric 0304 10 13*11, 0302 12 00*11, 0303 22 00*11and 0304 20 13*11). For the purpose of this Regulation, wild salmon shall be that in respect of which the competent authorities of the Member States of landing are satisfied, by means of all customs and transport documents to be provided by interested parties, that it was caught at sea. Article 3 The following companies shall be added to the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 772/1999 listing the companies exempted from the definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties: 24. 8. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 223/9 UT No Company name 193 194 195 196 F. Uhrenholt Seafood Norway AS Mesan Seafood AS Polaris Seafood AS Scanfish AS Article 4 TARIC additional code A033 A034 A035 A036 The Annex to Decision 97/634/EC is hereby replaced by Annex III to the present Regulation. Article 5 Article 2(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 929/1999 is 1. replaced by the following: ‘Provisional countervailing and anti-dumping duties are hereby imposed on imports of farmed (other than wild) Atlantic salmon falling within CN codes ex 0302 12 00 0302 12 00*22, (Taric 0302 12 00*21, ex 0303 22 00 0302 12 00*23 and 0302 12 00*29), 0303 22 00*22, (Taric 0303 22 00*21, codes: codes: ex 0304 10 13 0303 22 00*23 and 0303 22 00*29), (Taric codes: 0304 10 13*21 and 0304 10 13*29) and ex 0304 20 13 and codes: 0304 20 13*29) originating in Norway and exported by the companies listed in Annex II to the present Regulation. ’ 0304 20 13*21 (Taric Article 2(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 929/1999 is 2. replaced by the following: ‘The rate of the countervailing duty applicable to the net free-at-Community frontier price, before duty, shall be 3,8 %. ’ Article 2(2)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 929/1999 is 3. replaced by the following: ‘The rate of the anti-dumping duty applicable to the net free-at-Community frontier price, before duty, shall be EUR 0,32 per kilogram net product weight. However, if the free-at-Community-frontier price, including the coun- tervailing and anti-dumping duties, is less than the relevant minimum price set out in paragraph 3, the anti-dumping duty to be collected shall be the difference between that minimum price and the free-at-Community-frontier price, including the countervailing duty. ’ Article 6 This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, 23 August 1999. For the Commission Karel VAN MIERT Member of the Commission L 223/10 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 24. 8. 1999 List of companies subject to provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duties by Regulation (EC) No 929/1999 ANNEX I UT No Company 14 28 99 Arne Mathisen A/S Brødrene Eilertsen A/S Myre Sjømat AS TARIC additional code 8112 8126 8203 24. 8. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 223/11 Companies upon which provisional duties are imposed by Article 2 of the present Regulation ANNEX II UT No Company 75 Janas AS 116 187 Norfra Eksport AS Vie de France Norway AS TARIC additional code 8177 8229 8321 L 223/12 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 24. 8. 1999 ANNEX III ANNEX TO DECISION 97/634/EC List of the 112 companies from which undertakings are accepted, as updated on 25 August 1999 UT No Company name TARIC additional code 3 7 8 11 13 15 16 17 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 31 32 33 35 36 39 41 42 43 44 46 47 48 50 51 52 53 Agnefest Seafood Aqua Export A/S Aqua Partner A/S Arctic Group International Artic Superior A/S A/S Aalesundfisk A/S Austevoll Fiskeindustri A/S Keco A/S Refsnes Fiskeindustri A/S West Fish Ltd Astor A/S Atlantic King Stranda A/S Atlantic Seafood A/S Borkowski & Rosnes A/S Brødrene Aasjord A/S Christiansen Partner A/S Clipper Seafood A/S Coast Seafood A/S Dafjord Laks A/S Delfa Norge A/S Domstein Salmon A/S Ecco Fisk & Delikatesse Edvard Johnsen A/S Eurolaks AS Euronor AS Fiskeforsyningen AS Fjord Aqua Group AS Fjord Trading Ltd AS Fossen AS Fresh Atlantic AS Fresh Marine Company AS Fryseriet AS 8325 8100 8101 8109 8111 8113 8114 8115 8118 8119 8120 8121 8122 8124 8125 8129 8130 8131 8133 8134 8136 8138 8139 8140 8141 8143 8144 8145 8147 8148 8149 8150 24. 8. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 223/13 UT No Company name TARIC additional code 58 60 61 62 66 67 72 76 77 79 80 82 83 85 87 92 93 96 98 100 101 104 105 107 108 111 112 113 114 115 119 120 121 122 123 124 126 Grieg Seafood AS Haafa fisk AS Hallvard Lerøy AS Atlantis Filetfabrikk AS Hydro Seafood Norway AS Hydrotech-gruppen AS Inter Sea AS Joh. H. Pettersen AS Johan J. Helland AS Karsten J. Ellingsen AS Kr Kleiven & Co. AS Labeyrie Norge AS Lafjord Group AS Leica Fiskeprodukter Lofoten Seafood Export AS Marine Seafood AS Marstein Seafood AS Memo Food AS Midsundfisk AS Naco Trading AS Namdal Salmon AS Nergård AS Nils Williksen AS Nisja Trading AS Nor-Food AS Nordic Group ASA Nordreisa Laks AS Norexport AS Norfi Produkter AS Norfood Group AS Norsk Akvakultur AS Norsk Sjømat AS Northern Seafood AS Nortrade AS Norway Royal Salmon Sales AS Norway Royal Salmon AS Norway Seafoods AS 8300 8302 8303 8304 8159 8428 8174 8178 8179 8181 8182 8184 8185 8187 8188 8196 8197 8200 8202 8206 8207 8210 8211 8213 8214 8217 8218 8223 8227 8228 8232 8233 8307 8308 8309 8312 8314 L 223/14 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 24. 8. 1999 UT No Company name TARIC additional code 128 130 134 137 140 141 142 144 145 146 147 148 151 153 154 155 156 157 158 160 161 162 164 165 167 168 172 174 175 176 178 180 182 183 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 Norwell AS Nova Sea AS Ok-Fish Kvalheim AS Pan Fish Sales AS Polar Seafood Norway AS Prilam Norvège AS Pundslett Fisk Rolf Olsen Seafood AS Ryfisk AS Rørvik Fisk- og fiskematforretning AS Saga Lax Norge AS Prima Nor AS Sangoltgruppa AS Scanfood AS Sea Eagle Group AS Sea Star International AS Sea-Bell AS Seaco AS Seacom AS Seafood Farmers of Norway Ltd AS Seanor AS Sekkingstad AS Sirena Norway AS Kinn Salmon AS Fjord Seafood Leines AS SMP Marine Produkter AS Stjernelaks AS Stolt Sea Farm AS Storm Company AS Superior AS Terra Seafood AS Timar Seafood AS Torris Products Ltd AS Troll Salmon AS Vikenco AS Wannebo International AS West Fish Norwegian Salmon AS Nor-Fa Food AS Westmarine AS F. Uhrenholt Seafood Norway AS Mesan Seafood AS Polaris Seafood AS Scanfish AS 8316 8235 8239 8242 8247 8248 8251 8254 8256 8257 8258 8259 8262 8264 8265 8266 8267 8268 8269 8271 8272 8273 8275 8276 8278 8279 8283 8285 8286 8287 8289 8294 8298 8317 8322 8323 8324 8102 8625 A033 A034 A035 A036


title: Verordening (EG) nr. 1831/1999 van de Commissie van 23 augustus 1999 inzake de levering van witte suiker als voedselhulp

eurovoc_concepts:
Ethiopia
North Korea
food aid
white sugar

formats: pdf print

text: 24. 8. 1999 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen L 223/25 VERORDENING (EG) Nr. 1831/1999 VAN DE COMMISSIE van 23 augustus 1999 inzake de levering van witte suiker als voedselhulp DE COMMISSIE VAN DE EUROPESE GEMEENSCHAPPEN, Gelet op het Verdrag tot oprichting van de Europese Gemeen- schap, Gelet op Verordening (EG) nr. 1292/96 van de Raad van 27 juni 1996 betreffende het voedselhulpbeleid en het beheer van de voedselhulp en van de specifieke acties ter ondersteuning van de voedselzekerheid (1), en met name op artikel 24, lid 1, onder b), (1) (2) (3) Overwegende dat bĳ deze verordening de lĳst van de landen en organisaties die in aanmerking komen voor Gemeenschapssteun, en de algemene criteria voor het vervoer van de voedselhulp na het fob-stadium zĳn vast- gesteld; Overwegende dat de Commissie, ingevolge een aantal besluiten met betrekking tot de verlening van voedsel- hulp, aan bepaalde begunstigden witte suiker heeft toegewezen; Overwegende dat dit product moet worden geleverd overeenkomstig het bepaalde in Verordening (EG) nr. 2519/97 van de Commissie van 16 december 1997 tot vaststelling van algemene voorschriften op grond van Verordening (EG) nr. 1292/96 van de Raad voor de beschikbaarstelling van als communautaire voedselhulp te leveren producten (2); dat met name de leveringster- mĳnen en -voorwaarden om de aan de levering verbonden kosten te bepalen, dienen te worden vastge- steld, HEEFT DE VOLGENDE VERORDENING VASTGESTELD: Artikel 1 In het kader van de communautaire voedselhulp wordt in de Gemeenschap witte suiker beschikbaar gesteld voor levering aan de in de bĳlage vermelde begunstigden met inachtneming van Verordening (EG) nr. 2519/97 en de in de bĳlage vermelde voorwaarden. De inschrĳver wordt geacht kennis te hebben genomen van alle geldende algemene en bĳzondere voorwaarden. Elk ander in zĳn offerte gemaakt beding of voorbehoud is nietig. Artikel 2 Deze verordening treedt in werking op de dag volgende op die van haar bekendmaking in het Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen. Deze verordening is verbindend in al haar onderdelen en is rechtstreeks toepasselĳk in elke lidstaat. Gedaan te Brussel, 23 augustus 1999. Voor de Commissie Karel VAN MIERT Lid van de Commissie (1) PB L 166 van 5. 7. 1996, blz. 1. (2) PB L 346 van 17. 12. 1997, blz. 23. L 223/26 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen 24. 8. 1999 BĲLAGE PARTĲEN A en B 1. Actie nr. 187/98 (A); 188/98 (B) 2. Begunstigde (2): World Food Programme (WFP), via Cristoforo Colombo 426, I-00145 Roma (tel. : (39-6) 6513 2988; telefax: 6513 2844/3; telex: 626675 WFP I) 3. Vertegenwoordiger van de begunstigde: door de begunstigde aan te wĳzen 4. Land van bestemming: A: Ethiopië; B: Noord-Korea 5. Beschikbaar te stellen product: witte suiker 6. Totale hoeveelheid (aantal ton netto): 315 7. Aantal partĳen: 2 (A: 115 ton; B: 200 ton) 8. Kenmerken en kwaliteit van het product (3) (5) (8): zie PB C 114 van 29. 4. 1991, blz. 1 [V. A. 1] 9. Verpakking (7): zie PB C 267 van 13. 9. 1996, blz. 1 [11. 2. A 1. b, 2. b en B. 3] 10. Etikettering of merken (6): zie PB C 114 van 29. 4. 1991, blz. 1 [V. A. 3] — Voor het merken te gebruiken taal: Engels — Bĳkomende opschriften: — 11. Wĳze van beschikbaarstelling van het product: in de Gemeenschap geproduceerde suiker in de zin van artikel 24, lid 1 bis, zesde alinea, van Verordening (EEG) nr. 1785/81 van de Raad (PB L 177 van 1. 7. 1981, blz. 4): A- of B-suiker (onder a) of b)) 12. Voorgeschreven leveringsstadium: franco laadhaven 13. Alternatief leveringsstadium: — 14. a) Laadhaven: — b) Laadadres: — 15. Loshaven: — 16. Plaats van bestemming: — — doorgangshaven of transitpakhuis: — — vervoerroute over land: — 17. Leveringstermĳn of uiterste leveringstermĳn in het voorgeschreven stadium: — eerste termĳn: 27. 9 — 17. 10. 1999 — tweede termĳn: 11 — 31. 10. 1999 18. Leveringstermĳn of uiterste leveringstermĳn in het alternatieve stadium: — eerste termĳn: — — tweede termĳn: — 19. Uiterste termĳn voor de indiening van de offertes (om 12. 00 uur, Brusselse tĳd): — eerste termĳn: 7. 9. 1999 — tweede termĳn: 21. 9. 1999 20. Bedrag van de inschrĳvingszekerheid: 15 EUR/ton 21. Adres voor de inzending van de offertes en de inschrĳvingszekerheden (1): Afdeling Voedselhulp, ter attentie van de heer T. Vestergaard, Gebouw Loi 130, kamer 7/46, Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Brussel (alleen op nummer: tlx: 25670 AGREC B; fax: (32−2) 296 70 03/296 70 04) 22. Uitvoerrestitutie (4): periodieke van toepassing op witte suiker op 18. 8. 1999, vastgesteld bĳ Verordening (EG) nr. 1777/1999 van de Commissie (PB L 212 van 12. 8. 1999, blz. 13) 24. 8. 1999 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen L 223/27 Voetnoten (1) Aanvullende informatie: André Debongnie (tel. : (32-2) 295 14 65) of Torben Vestergaard (tel. : (32-2) 299 30 50). (2) De leverancier neemt zo spoedig mogelĳk contact op met de begunstigde of met zĳn vertegenwoordiger om na te gaan welke documenten voor verzending zĳn vereist. (3) De leverancier bezorgt aan de begunstigde een certificaat van een officiële instantie, waarin wordt verklaard dat voor het te leveren product de in de betrokken lidstaat geldende stralingsnormen niet zĳn overschreden. Op het radioactivi- teitsattest moet het gehalte aan caesium 134 en 137 en aan jodium 131 worden vermeld. (4) Verordening (EG) nr. 259/98 van de Commissie (PB L 25 van 31. 1. 1998, blz. 39) is van toepassing voor de restitutie bĳ uitvoer. De in artikel 2 van voornoemde verordening bedoelde datum is de datum die is vermeld in punt 22 van deze bĳlage. De aandacht van de leverancier wordt gevestigd op artikel 4, lid 1, laatste alinea, van genoemde verordening. De kopie van het certificaat wordt onmiddellĳk ingediend zodra de uitvoeraangifte is aanvaard (fax: (32-2) 296 20 05). (5) De leverancier legt aan de begunstigde of aan zĳn vertegenwoordiger bĳ de levering een gezondheidscertificaat voor. (6) In afwĳking van PB C 114 van 29 april 1991 wordt de tekst van punt V. A. 3 c) als volgt gelezen: „de vermelding „Europese Gemeenschap””. (7) Met het oog op eventueel opnieuw opzakken, dient de leverancier 2 % legen zakken extra te leveren van dezelfde kwaliteit als die waarin het product zich bevindt: op deze lege zakken dient eveneens de vermelding voor te komen, gevolgd door een hoofdletter R. (8) De toepassing van het bepaalde in artikel 18, lid 2, onder a), twee streepje, van Verordening (EEG) nr. 2103/77 van de Commissie (PB L 246 van 27. 9. 1977, blz. 12), laatstelĳk gewĳzigd bĳ Verordening (EG) nr. 260/96 (PB L 34 van 13. 2. 1996, blz. 16), is beslissend voor de vaststelling van de categorie van de suiker


title: Kommissionens förordning (EG) nr 1829/1999 av den 23 augusti 1999 om leverans av vegetabilisk olja som livsmedelsbistånd

eurovoc_concepts:
North Korea
food aid
sunflower seed oil
vegetable oil

text: 24. 8. 1999 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning L 223/19 KOMMISSIONENS FÖRORDNING (EG) nr 1829/1999 av den 23 augusti 1999 om leverans av vegetabilisk olja som livsmedelsbistånd EUROPEISKA GEMENSKAPERNAS KOMMISSION HAR ANTAGIT DENNA FÖRORDNING av varje parti skall lämnar det lägsta anbudet. tilldelas den anbudsgivare som med beaktande av Fördraget om upprättandet av Europeiska gemenskapen, med beaktande av rådets förordning (EG) nr 1292/96 av den 27 juni 1996 om principerna för förvaltning av livsmedelsbi- stånd samt om särskilda stödåtgärder för livsmedelsförsörj- ningen (1), särskilt artikel 24. 1 b i denna, och av följande skäl: 1. 2. 3. 4. I den nämnda förordningen fastställs förteckningen över länder och organ som har rätt att motta gemenskapsbi- stånd och anges de allmänna kriterierna för transport av livsmedelsbiståndet efter fob-stadiet. Som en följd av flera beslut om tilldelning av livsmedels- bistånd har kommissionen tilldelat vissa mottagare vege- tabilisk olja. Dessa leveranser bör ske i enlighet med bestämmelserna i kommissionens förordning (EG) nr 2519/97 av den 16 december 1997 om allmänna bestämmelser för anskaffning av varor som skall levereras som livsmedels- bistånd från gemenskapen i enlighet med rådets förord- ning (EG) nr 1292/96 (2). Det är nödvändigt att ange tidsfrister och leveransvillkor för att bestämma de därav följande kostnaderna. För att säkerställa att leveranserna för ett bestämt parti genomförs bör anbudsgivare ha möjlighet att framskaffa antingen rapsolja eller solrosolja. Kontrakt för leverans HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE. Artikel 1 Vegetabilisk olja skall framskaffas inom gemenskapen som livs- medelsbistånd för leverans till de mottagare som är förtecknade i bilagan i enlighet med förordning (EG) nr 2519/97 och enligt de villkor som anges i bilagan. Leveransen skall gälla framskaffning av vegetabilisk olja som är producerad inom gemenskapen. Framskaffning kan ej gälla produkt som är producerad och/eller paketerad enligt metoden för aktiv förädling. Anbud skall omfatta antingen rapsolja eller solrosolja. Anbud som inte innehåller uppgift om vilken typ av olja som avses skall avvisas. Anbudsgivare skall anses ha kännedom om och ha accepterat alla tillämpliga allmänna och särskilda villkor. Alla andra villkor eller förbehåll i hans anbud skall anses som oskrivna. Artikel 2 Denna förordning träder i kraft dagen efter det att den har offentliggjorts i Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning. Denna förordning är till alla delar bindande och direkt tillämplig i alla medlemsstater. Utfärdad i Bryssel den 23 augusti 1999. På kommissionens vägnar Karel VAN MIERT Ledamot av kommissionen (1) EGT L 166, 5. 7. 1996, s. 1. (2) EGT L 346, 17. 12. 1997, s. 23. L 223/20 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 24. 8. 1999 BILAGA PARTI A, B 1. Aktion nr: 189/98 (A); 190/98 (B) 2. Mottagare (2): WFP (World Food Programme), via Cristoforo Colombo 426, I-00145 Roma tel. : (39-6) 65 13 29 88; telefax: 65 13 28 44/3; telex: 626675 WFP I 3. Mottagarens representant: uppges av mottagaren 4. Bestämmelseland: Nordkorea 5. Vara som skall framskaffas: Raffinerad rapsolja eller raffinerad solrosolja 6. Total kvantitet (ton netto): 3 541 7. Antal partier: 2 (A: 2 000 t; B: 1 541 t) 8. Varans egenskaper och kvalitet (3) (4) (6): Se EGT C 114, 29. 4. 1991, s. 1 (III. A. 1a eller b) 9. Emballage: Se EGT C 267, 13. 9. 1996, s. 1 (10. 4. A, B och C. 2) 10. Etikettering eller märkning (5): Se EGT C 114, 29. 4. 1991, s. 1 (III. A. 3) — språk att använda vid märkning: engelska — tilläggsmärkning: — 11. Framskaffningsmetod: Framskaffning av raffinerad vegetabilisk olja som är producerad inom gemenskapen. Framskaffning kan ej gälla produkt som är producerad och/eller paketerad enligt metoden för aktiv förädling. 12. Fastställt leveransstadium: Fritt utskeppningshamnen 13. Alternativt leveransstadium: — 14. a) Utskeppningshamn: — b) Lastningsadress: — 15. Lossningshamn: — 16. Bestämmelseort: — — hamn eller transitlager: — — transportväg över land: — 17. Leveranstid (intervall eller sista dag) för det fastställda leveransstadiet: — första leveranstid: 27. 9–17. 10. 1999 — andra leveranstid: 11–31. 10. 1999 18. Leveranstid (intervall eller sista dag) för det alternativa leveransstadiet: — första leveranstid: — — andra leveranstid: — 19. Frist för ingivande av anbud (kl. 12. 00 lokal tid i Bryssel): — första leveranstid: 7. 9. 1999 — andra leveranstid: 21. 9. 1999 20. Anbudsgarantins belopp: 15 EUR/ton 21. Address för inlämnande av anbud och anbudsgaranti (1): Bureau de l'aide alimentaire, Attn. Mr T. Vestergaard Bâtiment Loi 130, bureau 7/46, Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Bryssel tlx: 25670 AGREC B; fax (32- 2) 296 70 03/296 70 04 (enbart) 22. Exportbidrag: — 24. 8. 1999 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning L 223/21 Fotnoter: (1) Ytterligare upplysningar: André Debongnie (tfn. (32- 2) 295 14 65), Torben Vestergaard (tfn. (32- 2) 299 30 50). (2) Leverantören skall så snart som möjligt vända sig till mottagaren för att fastställa vilka fraktdokument som krävs. (3) Leverantören skall till mottagaren överlämna ett intyg från ett officiellt organ som visar att de tillämpliga normerna för radioaktiv strålning i den berörda medlemsstaten inte har överskridits för den produkt som skall levereras. Radioaktivi- innehålla uppgift om halterna cesium-134 och cesium-137 samt halten jod-131. tetsintyget skall (4) Leverantören skall överlämna till mottagaren eller dennes representant följande dokument vid leveransen: — Sundhetscertifikat. (5) Trots punkt III. A. 3 c i EGT C 114 av den 29 april 1991 skall påskriften lyda på följande sätt: märkning ”Europeiska gemenskapen”. (6) Anbud som inte innehåller uppgift om vilken typ av olja som avses skall avvisas


title: Règlement (CE) n° 1830/1999 de la Commission, du 23 août 1999, relatif à la fourniture de pois cassés au titre de l'aide alimentaire

eurovoc_concepts:
North Korea
food aid
leguminous vegetable

text: L 223/22 FR Journal officiel des Communautés européennes 24. 8. 1999 RÈGLEMENT (CE) No 1830/1999 DE LA COMMISSION du 23 août 1999 relatif à la fourniture de pois cassés au titre de l'aide alimentaire LA COMMISSION DES COMMUNAUTÉS EUROPÉENNES, vu le traité instituant la Communauté européenne, vu le règlement (CE) no 1292/96 du Conseil du 27 juin 1996 concernant la politique et la gestion de l'aide alimentaire et des actions spécifiques d'appui à la sécurité alimentaire (1), et notamment son article 24, paragraphe 1, point b), (1) (2) (3) considérant que le règlement précité établit la liste des pays et organisations susceptibles de bénéficier d'une aide communautaire et détermine les critères généraux relatifs au transport de l'aide alimentaire au-delà du stade fob; considérant que, à la suite de plusieurs décisions relatives à l'allocation d'aide alimentaire, la Commission a alloué des pois cassés à certains bénéficiaires; considérant qu'il y a lieu de procéder à ces fournitures suivant les règles prévues au règlement (CE) no 2519/97 de la Commission du 16 décembre 1997 portant moda- lités générales de mobilisation de produits à fournir au titre du règlement (CE) no 1292/96 du Conseil pour l'aide alimentaire communautaire (2); qu'il est nécessaire de préciser notamment les délais et conditions de fourni- ture pour déterminer les frais qui en résultent; soumissionnaires de mobiliser soit des pois cassés verts soit des pois cassés jaunes, A ARRÊTÉ LE PRÉSENT RÈGLEMENT: Article premier Il est procédé, au titre de l'aide alimentaire communautaire, à la mobilisation dans la Communauté de pois cassés en vue de fournitures aux bénéficiaires indiqués en annexe, conformé- ment aux dispositions du règlement (CE) no 2519/97 et aux conditions figurant en annexe. Les offres portent soit sur des pois cassés verts soit sur des pois cassés jaunes. Sous peine d'irrecevabilité, chaque offre indique de manière précise le type de pois auquel elle se rapporte. Le soumissionnaire est réputé avoir pris connaissance de toutes les conditions générales et particulières applicables et les avoir acceptées. Toute autre condition ou réserve contenue dans son offre est réputée non écrite. Article 2 (4) considérant que, afin d'assurer la réalisation des fourni- il convient de prévoir la possibilité pour les tures, Le présent règlement entre en vigueur le jour suivant celui de sa publication au Journal officiel des Communautés européennes. Le présent règlement est obligatoire dans tous ses éléments et directement applicable dans tout État membre. Fait à Bruxelles, le 23 août 1999. Par la Commission Karel VAN MIERT Membre de la Commission (1) JO L 166 du 5. 7. 1996, p. 1. (2) JO L 346 du 17. 12. 1997, p. 23. 24. 8. 1999 FR Journal officiel des Communautés européennes L 223/23 ANNEXE LOTS A, B 1. Action No: 185/98 (lot A); 186/98 (lot B) 2. Béneficiaire (2): PAM, (World Food Programme), via Cristoforo Colombo 426, I- 00145 Roma tel. (39−6) 65 13 29 88; fax 65 13 28 44/3; telex 626675 WFP I 3. Représentant du bénéficiaire: à désigner par le bénéficiaire 4. Pays de destination: Corée du Nord 5. Produit à mobiliser (8): pois cassés 6. Quantité totale (tonnes net): 2 125 7. Nombre de lots: 2 (lot A: 1 125 tonnes; lot B: 1 000 tonnes) 8. Caractéristiques et qualité du produit: (3) (4) (7): — 9. Conditionnement: (5): JO C 267 du 13. 9. 1996, p. 1 (2. 1, A(1)(a), (2)(a) et B(4)) ou (4. 0 A(1)(c), (2)(c) et B(4)) 10. Etiquetage ou marquage (6): JO C 114 du 29. 4. 1991, p. 1 (IV. A(3)) — Langue à utiliser pour le marquage: anglais — Inscriptions complémentaires: — 11. Mode de mobilisation du produit: marché communautaireLe produit doit provenir de la Communauté. 12. Stade de livraison prévu: rendu port d'embarquement 13. Stade de livraison alternatif: — 14. a) Port d'embarquement: — b) Adresse de chargement: — 15. Port de débarquement: — 16. Lieu de destination: — — port ou magasin de transit: — — voie de transport terrestre: — 17. Période ou date limit de livraison au stade prévu: — premier délai: du 27. 9 au 17. 10. 1999 — deuxième délai: du 11 au 31. 10. 1999 18. Période ou date limite de livraison au stade alternatif: — premier délai: — — deuxième délai: — 19. Délai pour la présentation des offres (à 12 heures, heure de Brusselle): — premier délai: — deuxième délai: le 7. 9. 1999 le 21. 9. 1999 20. Montant de la garantie de soumission: 5 EUR par tonne 21. Adresse pour l'envoi des offres et des garanties de soumission: (1): Bureau de l'aide alimentaire, Attn Mr T. Vestergaard Bâtiment Loi 130, bureau 7/46, Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel telex 25670 AGREC B; fax (32−2) 296 70 03/296 70 04 (exclusivement) 22. Restitution à l'exportation: — L 223/24 FR Journal officiel des Communautés européennes 24. 8. 1999 Notes: (1) Renseignements compléméntaires: André Debongnie (tel. (32 2) 295 14 65), Torben Vestergaard (tel. (32 2) 299 30 50). (2) Le fournisseur prend contact avec le bénéficiare ou son représentant dans les plus brefs délais, en vue de déterminer les documents d'expédition nécessaires. (3) Le fournisseur délivre au bénéficiaire un certificat émanant d'une instance officielle et certifiant que, pour le produit à livrer, les normes en vigueur, relatives à la radiation nucléaire, dans l'État membre concerné ne sont pas dépassées. Le certificat de radioactivité doit indiquer la teneur en césiums 134 et 137 et en iode 131. (4) Le fournisseur transmet au bénéficiaire ou à son représentant, lors de la livraison, le document suivant: — un certificat phytosanitaire. (5) En vue d'un éventuel réensachage, le fournisseur devra fournir 2 % des sacs vides, de la même qualité que ceux contenant la marchandise, avec l'inscription suivie d'un «R» majuscule. (6) Par dérogation au Journal officiel des Communautés européenes C 114 du 29 avril 1991, le texte du point IV. A(3)(c) est remplacé par le texte suivant: «la mention “Communauté européenne”», et le texte du point IV. A(3)(b) par le texte suivant: «pois cassés». (7) Sous peine d'irrecevabilité, chaque offre indique de manière précise le type de pois auquel elle se rapporte. (8) Pois jaunes ou verts (Pisum sativum) destinés à l'alimentation humaine, provenant de la récolte la plus récente. Les pois ne doivent pas avoir été colorés artificiellement. Les pois cassés doivent être traités à la vapeur pendant minimum deux minutes ou avoir été fumigés (*) et répondre aux conditions suivantes: — humidité: au maximum 15 %, — matières étrangères: au maximum 0,1 %, — brisures: au maximum 10 % (par brisures, on entend les parties qui passent au travers d'un tamis à trous circulaires d'un diamètre de 5 millimètres). — pourcentage de graines de couleur différente ou décolorées: au maximum 1. 5 % (pois jaunes), au maximum 15 % (pois verts). — temps de cuisson: 45 minutes (après trempage de 12 heures) ou 60 minutes au maximum (sans trempage). (*) L'adjudiciaire transmet au bénéficiaire ou à son représentant, lors de la livraison, un certificat de fumigation


title: Proposta di regolamento (CE) del Consiglio recante modifica del regolamento (CE) n. 772/1999 del Consiglio che istituisce un dazio antidumping e un dazio compensativo definitivi sulle importazioni di salmoni dell'Atlantico di allevamento originari della Norvegia

eurovoc_concepts:
Norway
anti-dumping duty
export subsidy
fish
import

formats: html pdf

text: COMMISSIONE DELLE COMUNITÀ EUROPEE Bruxelles, 23. 08. 1999 COM(1999) 429 def. Proposta di REGOLAMENTO (CE) DEL CONSIGLIO recante modifica del Regolamento (CE) n. 772/1999 del Consiglio che istituisce un dazio antidumping e un dazio compensativo definitivi sulle importazioni di salmoni dell'Atlantico di allevamento originari della Norvegia (presentata dalla Commissione) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. RELAZIONE Con il regolamento (CE) n. 772/1999 il Consiglio ha istituito dazi antidumping e dazi compensativi definitivi sulle importazioni di salmoni dell'Atlantico d'allevamento dalla Norvegia, fatta eccezione per i salmoni esportati da uno degli esportatori norvegesi i cui impegni individuali relativi ai prezzi erano stati accettati dalla Commissione con la decisione 97/634/CE. I nomi di tali società sono elencati nell'allegato della suddetta decisione. Con il regolamento (CE) n. 929/1999 la Commissione ha istituito dazi antidumping e dazi compensativi provvisori nei confronti di quattro esportatori norvegesi che avevano apparentemente violato i loro impegni in relazione al terzo trimestre di relazione del 1998. A seguito di ulteriori indagini è risultato che una di queste quattro società, alle quali era stata offerta la possibilità di presentare le loro osservazioni, non aveva violato il suo impegno e la Commissione ha quindi revocato i dazi provvisori istituiti nei suoi confronti. Per quanto riguarda le altre tre società, si è definitivamente accertato che non avevano rispettato gli obblighi assunti ai sensi dei loro impegni, e si propone pertanto che il Consiglio istituisca dazi definitivi nei loro confronti. Inoltre, altre quattro società norvegesi hanno dichiarato di essere "nuovi esportatori" ai sensi del regolamento antidumping di base e hanno offerto impegni. Dopo aver svolto le opportune indagini, la Commissione ha accettato gli impegni e le società sono state aggiunte all'elenco delle società che beneficiano di un'esenzione dai dazi. Altre due società i cui impegni erano stati precedentemente accettati hanno informato la Commissione di aver cambiato ragione sociale e hanno chiesto che tale cambiamento fosse ripreso nell'elenco delle società che beneficiano di un'esenzione dai dazi. Tali richieste sono risultate accettabili e l'elenco dovrebbe essere modificato di conseguenza. 2 Proposta di REGOLAMENTO (CE) DEL CONSIGLIO recante modifica del Regolamento (CE) n. 772/1999 del Consiglio che istituisce un dazio antidumping e un dazio compensativo definitivi sulle importazioni di salmoni dell'Atlantico di allevamento originari della Norvegia IL CONSIGLIO DELL'UNIONE EUROPEA, visto il trattato che istituisce la Comunità europea, visto regolamento (CE) n. 384/96 del Consiglio, del 22 dicembre 1995, relativo alla difesa contro le importazioni oggetto di dumping da parte di paesi non membri della Comunità europea1, come da ultimo modificato dal regolamento (CE) n. 905/982, del 27 aprile 1998, in particolare l'articolo 8, paragrafo 9, e l'articolo 9, visto il regolamento (CE) n. 2026/97 del Consiglio, del 6 ottobre 1997, relativo alla difesa contro le importazioni oggetto di sovvenzioni provenienti da paesi non membri della Comunità europea3, in particolare l'articolo 13, paragrafo 9, e l'articolo 15, vista la proposta presentata dalla Commissione dopo aver sentito il comitato consultivo, considerando quanto segue: A. DAZI PROVVISORI (1) (2) Nel quadro delle indagini antidumping e antisovvenzioni avviate con due distinti avvisi pubblicati sulla Gazzetta Ufficiale delle Comunità europee4, la Commissione ha accettato, con la decisione 97/634/CE5, gli impegni offerti dal Regno di Norvegia e da 190 esportatori norvegesi. Il testo di tali impegni prevede che la mancata presentazione di una relazione trimestrale di tutte le operazioni di vendita al primo acquirente non collegato nella Comunità entro un termine prestabilito, fatta eccezione per i casi di forza maggiore, sia interpretata come una violazione dell'impegno, così come il mancato rispetto dell'obbligo di vendere il prodotto in questione sul mercato della Comunità a prezzi pari o superiori ai prezzi minimi previsti nell'impegno. 1 2 3 4 5 GU L 56 del 6. 3. 1996, pag. 1. GU L 128 del 30. 4. 1998, pag. 18. GU L 288 del 21. 10. 1997, pag. 1. GU C 235 del 31. 8. 1996, pag. 18, e GU C 235 del 31. 8. 1996, pag. 20. GU L 267 del 30. 9. 1997, pag. 81. 3 (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Per il terzo trimestre del 1998, una società norvegese non ha presentato una relazione entro il termine prestabilito, mentre un altro esportatore norvegese aveva apparentemente venduto il prodotto in questione sul mercato della Comunità a un prezzo inferiore a quello previsto nel suo impegno. Altri due ingannevoli esportatori sull'identità dell'esportatore e sull'identità e sulla natura delle vendite indicate. fatto dichiarazioni apparentemente avevano loro le condizioni dei impegni e pertanto, con La Commissione è stata dunque indotta a ritenere che queste quattro società il avessero violato regolamento (CE) n. 929/19996 (in appresso denominato "il regolamento dei dazi provvisori"), ha istituito dazi antidumping e dazi compensativi provvisori sulle importazioni di salmoni dell'Atlantico di allevamento di cui ai codici NC ex 0302 12 00, ex 0304 10 13, ex 0303 22 00 ed ex 0304 20 13 originari della Norvegia ed esportati delle quattro società di cui all'allegato II del suddetto regolamento. Con lo stesso regolamento la Commissione ha depennato le società in questione dall'allegato della decisione 97/634/EC, che elenca le società i cui impegni sono stati accettati. B. PROCEDURA SUCCESSIVA A tutte e quattro le società norvegesi assoggettate ai dazi provvisori sono stati comunicati per iscritto i fatti e le considerazioni essenziali in base ai quali si istituivano tali dazi provvisori. Inoltre si è data loro la possibilità di presentare osservazioni e di chiedere di essere sentite. Entro la scadenza fissata nel regolamento sui dazi provvisori, tutte le società norvegesi in questione hanno presentato osservazioni scritte e una ha chiesto e ottenuto di essere sentita. Successivamente, la Commissione ha raccolto ed esaminato tutte le informazioni ritenute necessarie per poter trarre conclusioni definitive sulle presunte violazioni. In questo contesto, l'inchiesta della Commissione ha accertato che una delle società nei confronti delle quali erano state istituite misure provvisorie non aveva violato il suo impegno e doveva dunque essere reintegrata nell'elenco delle società che beneficiano di un'esenzione dalle misure antidumping e compensative. L'esportatore è stato informato dei fatti e delle considerazioni essenziali in base ai quali si intendeva ripristinare l'accettazione del suo impegno da parte della Commissione. il ritiro dell'accettazione dei Le altre tre società assoggettate alle misure provvisorie sono state informate dei fatti e delle considerazioni essenziali in base ai quali si intendeva impegni da parte della confermare Commissione e raccomandare l'istituzione di dazi antidumping e compensativi definitivi e la riscossione definitiva degli importi depositati a titolo di dazi provvisori. Inoltre, è stato concesso loro un periodo di tempo entro il quale presentare osservazioni dopo la comunicazione di tali informazioni. loro 6 GU L 115 del 4. 5. 1999, pag. 13. 4 (8) (9) (10) (11) Le conclusioni della Commissione a questo proposito sono illustrate più diffusamente nel regolamento (CE) n. [numero]7. Nessuna delle osservazioni presentate, tuttavia, ha modificato la conclusione che si debbano istituire dazi antidumping e dazi compensativi definitivi sulle importazioni di salmoni dell'Atlantico di allevamento originari della Norvegia ed esportati dalle tre società di cui all'allegato I del presente regolamento. C. DAZI DEFINITIVI Le inchieste che hanno portato agli impegni si erano concluse con un accertamento definitivo in materia di dumping e di pregiudizio mediante il regolamento (CE) n. 1890/97 e con un accertamento definitivo in materia di sovvenzione e di pregiudizio mediante il regolamento (CE) n. 1891/97. Sebbene entrambi questi regolamenti siano stati abrogati dal regolamento (CE) n. 772/19998, i fatti e le considerazioni in essi accertati rimangono validi (come indicato al punto 19 del regolamento (CE) n. 772/1999). Conformemente all'articolo 8, paragrafo 9, del regolamento (CE) n. 384/96 e, rispettivamente, all'articolo 13, paragrafo 9, del regolamento (CE) n. 2067/97, l'aliquota del dazio antidumping e del dazio compensativo dev'essere stabilita in base ai fatti accertati nel contesto dell'inchiesta che ha portato all'impegno. Alla luce di tale disposizione, nonché del punto 107 del regolamento (CE) n. 1890/97 e del punto 149 del regolamento (CE) n. 1891/97, si ritiene opportuno fissare le aliquote dei dazi antidumping e dei dazi compensativi definitivi al livello e nella forma stabiliti dal regolamento (CE) n. 772/1999. D. RISCOSSIONE DEFINITIVA DEI DAZI PROVVISORI (12) Si è accertata in via definitiva una violazione degli impegni in relazione ai tre esportatori che sono venuti meno ai loro impegni. Si ritiene pertanto necessario riscuotere in via definitiva al livello dei dazi definitivi gli importi depositati da questi esportatori a titolo di dazi antidumping e di dazi compensativi provvisori. E. EMENDAMENTO DELL'ALLEGATO DEL REGOLAMENTO (CE) N. 772/1999 (13) Con il regolamento (cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)/1999 la Commissione ha accettato gli impegni di quattro nuovi esportatori, la F. Uhrenholt Seafood Norway AS, la Mesan Seafood AS, la Polaris Seafood AS e la Scanfish AS. Conformemente all'articolo 2 del regolamento (CE) n. 772/1999, la Commissione ha inoltre esteso a queste società l'esenzione dai dazi antidumping e dai dazi compensativi aggiungendo i loro nomi all'allegato del suddetto regolamento. 7 8 GU L [numero] del [data], pag. [pagina]. GU L 101 del 16. 4. 1999, pag. 1. 5 (14) (15) Due esportatori norvegesi già figuranti nell'elenco delle società i cui impegni sono stati accettati hanno informato la Commissione che le loro ragioni sociali erano cambiate da Herøy Filetfabrikk AS a Atlantis Filetfabrikk AS e da SL Fjordgruppen AS a Fjord Seafood Leines AS e hanno chiesto che tali fossero ripresi nell'elenco delle società che beneficiano cambiamenti dell'esenzione dal pagamento dei dazi antidumping e dei dazi compensativi. La Commissione ha accertato che non c'erano cambiamenti nelle strutture aziendali che richiedessero un esame più dettagliato dell'opportunità che tali società mantenessero i loro impegni. luce di tutto quanto precede, Di conseguenza, alla l'allegato del regolamento (CE) n. 772/1999, che esonera dal dazio gli operatori figuranti nell'elenco, dovrebbe essere modificato in modo da depennare dalle società esentate dai dazi le società di cui all'allegato I del presente regolamento. L'allegato dovrebbe inoltre essere aggiornato per tenere conto dell'esenzione estesa dal regolamento (cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)/1999 alla F. Uhrenholt Seafood Norway AS, alla Mesan Seafood AS, alla Polaris Seafood AS e alla Scanfish AS, e del cambiamento di ragione sociale della Herøy Filetfabrikk in Atlantis Filetfabrikk AS e della SL Fjordgruppen AS in Fjord Seafood Leines AS. HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO: Articolo 1 L'allegato del regolamento (CE) n. 772/1999 è sostituito dall'allegato II del presente regolamento. Articolo 2 Sono definitivamente riscossi gli importi depositati a titolo dei dazi antidumping e dei dazi compensativi provvisori istituiti dal regolamento (CE) n. 929/1999 in relazione ai salmoni dell'Atlantico di allevamento (non allo stato libero) di cui ai codici NC ex 0302 12 00 (codici TARIC: 0302 12 00*21, 0302 12 00*22, 0302 12 00*23 e 0302 12 00*29), ex 0303 22 00 (codici TARIC: 0303 22 00*21, 0303 22 00*22, 0303 22 00*23 e 0303 22 00*29), ex 0304 10 13 (codici TARIC: 0304 10 13*21 e 0304 10 13*29) ed ex 0304 20 13 (codici TARIC: 0304 20 13*21 e 0304 20 13*29) originari della Norvegia ed esportati dalle società elencate nell'allegato I del presente regolamento. 6 Articolo 3 Il presente regolamento entra in vigore il giorno successivo a quello della sua pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunità europee. Il presente regolamento è obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri. Fatto a Bruxelles, il Per il Consiglio Il Presidente 7 ALLEGATO I Elenco delle società assoggettate a dazi antidumping e a dazi compensativi definitivi N. imp. Ragione sociale Arne Mathisen A/S Brødrene Eilertsen A/S 14 28 99 Myre Sjømat AS Codice addizionale Taric 8112 8126 8203 8 ALLEGATO II Elenco delle società esonerate dal dazio antidumping e dal dazio compensativo definitivi N. imp. Ragione sociale Codice addizionale Taric 3 7 8 11 13 15 16 17 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 31 32 33 35 36 39 41 42 43 44 46 47 48 50 51 52 53 58 60 61 62 66 67 75 72 Agnefest Seafood Aqua Export A/S Aqua Partner A/S Arctic Group International Artic Superior A/S A/S Aalesundfisk A/S Austevoll Fiskeindustri A/S Keco A/S Refsnes Fiskeindustri A/S West Fish Ltd Astor A/S Atlantic King Stranda A/S Atlantic Seafood A/S Borkowski & Rosnes A/S Brødrene Aasjord A/S Christiansen Partner A/S Clipper Seafood A/S Coast Seafood A/S Dafjord Laks A/S Delfa Norge A/S Domstein Salmon A/S Ecco Fisk & Delikatesse Edvard Johnsen A/S Eurolaks AS Euronor AS Fiskeforsyningen AS Fjord Aqua Group AS Fjord Trading Ltd. AS Fossen AS Fresh Atlantic AS Fresh Marine Company AS Fryseriet AS Grieg Seafood AS Haafa fisk AS Hallvard Lerøy AS Atlantis Filetfabrikk AS Hydro Seafood Norway AS Hydrotech-gruppen AS Janas AS Inter Sea AS 9 8325 8100 8101 8109 8111 8113 8114 8115 8118 8119 8120 8121 8122 8124 8125 8129 8130 8131 8133 8134 8136 8138 8139 8140 8141 8143 8144 8145 8147 8148 8149 8150 8300 8302 8303 8304 8159 8428 8177 8174 N. imp. Ragione sociale Codice addizionale Taric 76 77 79 80 82 83 85 87 92 93 96 98 100 101 104 105 107 108 111 112 113 114 115 116 119 120 121 122 123 124 126 128 130 134 137 140 141 142 144 145 146 147 148 151 153 Joh. H. Pettersen AS Johan J. Helland AS Karsten J. Ellingsen AS Kr Kleiven & Co. AS Labeyrie Norge AS Lafjord Group AS Leica Fiskeprodukter Lofoten Seafood Export AS Marine Seafood AS Marstein Seafood AS Memo Food AS Misundfisk AS Naco Trading AS Namdal Salmon AS Nergård AS Nils Williksen AS Nisja Trading AS Nor-Food AS Nordic Group ASA Nordreisa Laks AS Norexport AS Norfi Produkter AS Norfood Group AS Norfra Eksport AS Norsk Akvakultur AS Norsk Sjømat AS Northern Seafood AS Nortrade AS Norway Royal Salmon Sales AS Norway Royal Salmon AS Norway Seafoods ASA Norwell AS Nova Sea AS Ok-Fish Kvalheim AS Pan Fish Sales AS Polar Seafood Norway AS Prilam Norvège AS Pundslett Fisk Rolf Olsen Seafood AS Ryfisk AS Rørvik Fisk-og fiskematforretning AS Saga Lax Norge AS Prima Nor AS Sangoltgruppa AS Scanfood AS 10 8178 8179 8181 8182 8184 8185 8187 8188 8196 8197 8200 8202 8206 8207 8210 8211 8213 8214 8217 8218 8223 8227 8228 8229 8232 8233 8307 8308 8309 8312 8314 8316 8235 8239 8242 8247 8248 8251 8254 8256 8257 8258 8259 8262 8264 N. imp. Ragione sociale Codice addizionale Taric 154 155 156 157 158 160 161 162 164 165 167 168 172 174 175 176 178 180 182 183 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 Sea Eagle Group AS Sea Star International AS Sea-Bell AS Seaco AS Seacom AS Seafood Farmers of Norway Ltd AS Seanor AS Sekkingstad AS Sirena Norway AS Kinn Salmon AS Fjord Seafood Leines AS SMP Marine Produkter AS Stjernelaks AS Stolt Sea Farm AS Storm Company AS Superior AS Terra Seafood AS Timar Seafood AS Torris Products Ltd. AS Troll Salmon AS Vie de France Norway AS Vikenco AS Wannebo International AS West Fish Norwegian Salmon AS Nor-Fa Food AS Westmarine AS F. Uhrenholt Seafood Norway AS Mesan Seafood AS Polaris Seafood AS Scanfish AS 8265 8266 8267 8268 8269 8271 8272 8273 8275 8276 8278 8279 8283 8285 8286 8287 8289 8294 8298 8317 8321 8322 8323 8324 8102 8625 A033 A034 A035 A036 11


title: Verordening (EG) nr. 1825/1999 van de Commissie van 23 augustus 1999 tot vaststelling van forfaitaire invoerwaarden voor de bepaling van de invoerprijzen van bepaalde soorten groenten en fruit

eurovoc_concepts:
citrus fruit
fruit vegetable
grape
import price
pip fruit
stone fruit

text: 24. 8. 1999 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen L 223/1 I (Besluiten waarvan de publicatie voorwaarde is voor de toepassing) VERORDENING (EG) Nr. 1825/1999 VAN DE COMMISSIE van 23 augustus 1999 tot vaststelling van forfaitaire invoerwaarden voor de bepaling van de invoerprĳzen van bepaalde soorten groenten en fruit DE COMMISSIE VAN DE EUROPESE GEMEENSCHAPPEN, (2) Gelet op het Verdrag tot oprichting van de Europese Gemeen- schap, Gelet op Verordening (EG) nr. 3223/94 van de Commissie van 21 december 1994 houdende uitvoeringsbepalingen van de invoerregeling voor groenten en fruit (1), laatstelĳk gewĳzigd bĳ Verordening (EG) nr. 1498/98 (2), en met name op artikel 4, lid 1, (1) Overwegende dat in Verordening (EG) nr. 3223/94 op grond van de multilaterale handelsbesprekingen in het kader van de Uruguay-Ronde de criteria zĳn vastgesteld aan de hand waarvan de Commissie voor de producten en de periodes die in de bĳlage bĳ die verordening zĳn vermeld, de forfaitaire waarden bĳ invoer uit derde landen vaststelt; Overwegende dat op grond van de bovenvermelde criteria de forfaitaire invoerwaarden moeten worden vastgesteld op de in de bĳlage bĳ deze verordening vermelde niveaus, HEEFT DE VOLGENDE VERORDENING VASTGESTELD: Artikel 1 De in artikel 4 van Verordening (EG) nr. 3223/94 bedoelde forfaitaire invoerwaarden worden vastgesteld zoals aangegeven in de bĳlage bĳ deze verordening. in de tabel Artikel 2 Deze verordening treedt in werking op 24 augustus 1999. Deze verordening is verbindend in al haar onderdelen en is rechtstreeks toepasselĳk in elke lidstaat. Gedaan te Brussel, 23 augustus 1999. Voor de Commissie Karel VAN MIERT Lid van de Commissie (1) PB L 337 van 24. 12. 1994, blz. 66. (2) PB L 198 van 15. 7. 1998, blz. 4. L 223/2 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen 24. 8. 1999 bĳ de verordening van de Commissie van 23 augustus 1999 tot vaststelling van forfaitaire invoerwaarden voor de bepaling van de invoerprĳzen van bepaalde soorten groenten en fruit BĲLAGE GN-code 0709 90 70 0805 30 10 0806 10 10 0808 10 20, 0808 10 50, 0808 10 90 0808 20 50 0809 30 10, 0809 30 90 0809 40 05 Code derde landen (1) Forfaitaire invoerwaarde (in EUR/100 kg) 052 999 388 524 528 999 052 400 600 624 999 388 400 508 512 524 528 800 804 999 052 388 999 052 068 999 064 066 068 999 40,1 40,1 57,3 72,2 70,5 66,7 88,0 242,0 83,6 87,2 125,2 60,7 55,8 62,6 46,6 47,0 51,6 76,0 75,7 59,5 90,3 62,9 76,6 90,9 46,0 68,5 51,4 46,6 44,3 47,4 (1) Landennomenclatuur vastgesteld bĳ Verordening (EG) nr. 2645/98 van de Commissie (PB L 335 van 10. 12. 1998, blz. 22). De code „999” staat voor „andere oorsprong”


title: Verordening (EG) nr. 1827/1999 van de Commissie van 23 augustus 1999 tot schorsing van het preferentiële douanerecht en tot wederinvoering van het recht van het gemeenschappelijk douanetarief bij invoer van kleinbloemige rozen van oorsprong uit Israël

eurovoc_concepts:
CCT duties
Israel
floriculture
import
suspension of customs duties
tariff preference

text: 24. 8. 1999 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen L 223/15 VERORDENING (EG) Nr. 1827/1999 VAN DE COMMISSIE van 23 augustus 1999 tot schorsing van het preferentiële douanerecht en tot wederinvoering van het recht van het gemeenschappelĳk douanetarief bĳ invoer van kleinbloemige rozen van oorsprong uit Israël DE COMMISSIE VAN DE EUROPESE GEMEENSCHAPPEN, nr. 700/88 van de Commissie (6), laatstelĳk gewĳzigd bĳ Verordening (EG) nr. 2062/97 (7); Gelet op het Verdrag tot oprichting van de Europese Gemeen- schap, Gelet op Verordening (EEG) nr. 4088/87 van de Raad van 21 december 1987 tot vaststelling van de voorwaarden voor de toepassing van preferentiële douanerechten bĳ invoer van bepaalde producten van de bloementeelt van oorsprong uit Jordanië en Marokko alsmede de Westelĳke Cyprus, Jordaanoever en de Gazastrook (1), laatstelĳk gewĳzigd bĳ Verordening (EG) nr. 1300/97 (2), inzonderheid op artikel 5, lid 2, onder b), Israël, (1) (2) Overwegende dat bĳ Verordening (EEG) nr. 4088/87 de voorwaarden zĳn vastgesteld voor de toepassing van een preferentieel douanerecht op grootbloemige rozen, kleinbloemige rozen, eenbloemige anjers (standaard) en veelbloemige anjers (tros) binnen de tariefcontingenten die jaarlĳks worden geopend voor de invoer van verse snĳbloemen in de Gemeenschap; Overwegende dat bĳ Verordening (EG) nr. 1981/94 van de Raad (3), laatstelĳk gewĳzigd bĳ Verordening (EG) nr. 650/98 van de Commissie (4), communautaire tariefcon- tingenten geopend zĳn en de wĳze van beheer daarvan is vastgesteld voor afgesneden bloemen, bloesems en bloemknoppen, vers, respectievelĳk van oorsprong uit Israël, Malta, Marokko, de Westelĳke Cyprus, Egypte, Jordaanoever en de Gezastrook; (3) Overwegende dat bĳ Verordening (EG) nr. 1828/1999 van de Commissie (5) de communautaire productie- en invoerprĳzen voor anjers en rozen in het kader van de betrokken regeling zĳn vastgesteld; (5) (6) (7) Overwegende dat uit de waarnemingen die overeenkom- stig het bepaalde in de Verordeningen (EEG) nr. 4088/87 en (EEG) nr. 700/88 zĳn verricht, geconcludeerd moet worden dat de in artikel 2, lid 2, van Verordening (EEG) nr. 4088/87 bedoelde voorwaarden vervuld zĳn voor een schorsing van het preferentiële douanerecht voor kleinbloemige rozen van oorsprong uit Israël; dat derhalve het recht van het gemeenschappelĳk douaneta- rief opnieuw geldt; Overwegende dat het contingent voor de betrokken producten geldt voor de periode van 1 januari tot en met 31 december 1998; dat het preferentiële recht derhalve uiterlĳk tot het einde van deze periode wordt geschorst en eveneens uiterlĳk tot het einde van die periode opnieuw het gemeenschappelĳk douanetarief geldt; Overwegende dat de Commissie, in de periodes tussen de vergaderingen van het comité van beheer, deze maat- regelen zonder het advies van het comité dient vast te stellen, HEEFT DE VOLGENDE VERORDENING VASTGESTELD: Artikel 1 de van invoer kleinbloemige Voor (GN-codes ex 0603 10 11 en ex 0603 10 51) van oorsprong uit Israël wordt het bĳ Verordening (EG) nr. 1981/94 vastgestelde prefe- rentiële douanerecht geschorst en geldt het recht van het gemeenschappelĳk douanetarief opnieuw. rozen (4) Overwegende dat de uitvoeringsbepalingen van de betrokken regeling zĳn vastgesteld bĳ Verordening (EEG) Artikel 2 (1) PB L 382 van 31. 12. 1987, blz. 22. (2) PB L 177 van 5. 7. 1997, blz. 1. (3) PB L 199 van 2. 8. 1994, blz. 1. (4) PB L 88 van 24. 3. 1998, blz. 8. (5) Zie bladzĳde 17 van dit Piblicatieblad. Deze verordening treedt in werking op 25 augustus 1999. (6) PB L 72 van 18. 3. 1988, blz. 16. (7) PB L 289 van 22. 10. 1997, blz. 1. L 223/16 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen 24. 8. 1999 Deze verordening is verbindend in al haar onderdelen en is rechtstreeks toepasselĳk in elke lidstaat. Gedaan te Brussel, 23 augustus 1999. Voor de Commissie Karel VAN MIERT Lid van de Commissie


title: Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 1827/1999 af 23. august 1999 om suspension af præferencetolden og genindførelse af tolden ifølge den fælles toldtarif ved indførsel af småblomstrede roser med oprindelse i Israel

text: 24. 8. 1999 DA De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende L 223/15 KOMMISSIONENS FORORDNING (EF) Nr. 1827/1999 af 23. august 1999 om suspension af præferencetolden og genindførelse af tolden ifølge den fælles toldtarif ved indførsel af småblomstrede roser med oprindelse i Israel KOMMISSIONEN FOR DE EUROPÆISKE FÆLLESSKABER HAR — (4) ved Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 700/88 (6), senest ændret ved forordning (EF) nr. 2062/97 (7), er for ordningen blevet gennemførelsesbestemmelserne fastsat; under henvisning til traktaten om oprettelse af Det Europæiske Fællesskab, under henvisning til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 4088/87 af 21. december 1987 om betingelserne for anvendelse af præfe- rencetold ved indførsel af blomsterdyrkningens af visse produkter med oprindelse i Cypern, Israel, Jordan og Marokko samt på Vestbredden og i Gazastriben (1), senest ændret ved forordning (EF) nr. 1300/97 (2), særlig artikel 5, stk. 2, litra b), og ud fra følgende betragtninger: (1) (2) Forordning (EØF) nr. 4088/87 fastsætter betingelserne stor- og for anvendelse af en præferencetold for småblomstrede roser, enkeltblomstrede nelliker (stan- inden for dard) og mangeblomstrede nelliker (spray) rammerne af årlige toldkontingenter for indførsel til Fællesskabet af friske afskårne blomster; forordning (EF) nr. 1981/94 (3), senest ved Rådets ændret ved Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 650/ 98 (4), er der fastsat åbning og forvaltning af fællesskabs- toldkontingenter for afskårne blomster og blomster- knopper, friske, med oprindelse i Cypern, Egypten, Israel, Malta, Marokko samt på Vestbredden og i Gaza- striben; (5) (6) på grundlag af de konstateringer, der er foretaget efter bestemmelserne i forordning (EØF) nr. 4088/87 og (EØF) nr. 700/88, kan det fastslås, at de i artikel 2, stk. 2, i forordning (EØF) nr. 4088/87 fastsatte betingelser er for en suspension af præferencetolden for opfyldt småblomstrede roser med oprindelse i tolden ifølge den fælles toldtarif bør derfor genindføres; Israel; kontingentet af de pågældende produkter vedrører perioden fra 1. januar til 31. december 1998; suspension af præferencetolden og genindførelse af tolden i den fælles toldtarif kan kun foretages indtil udgangen af denne periode; (7) i perioden mellem forvaltningskomitéens møder bør Kommissionen træffe disse foranstaltninger — UDSTEDT FØLGENDE FORORDNING: Artikel 1 For indførsel af småblomstrede roser (KN-kode ex 0603 10 11 og ex 0603 10 51) med oprindelse i Israel suspenderes den ved forordning (EF) nr. 1981/94 fastsatte præferencetold, og tolden ifølge den fælles toldtarif genindføres. (3) ved Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 1828/1999 (5) er Fællesskabets produktions- og importpriser for nelliker og roser blevet fastsat med henblik på ordningens anvendelse; Artikel 2 (1) EFT L 382 af 31. 12. 1987, s. 22. (2) EFT L 177 af 5. 7. 1997, s. 1. (3) EFT L 199 af 2. 8. 1994, s. 1. (4) EFT L 88 af 24. 3. 1998, s. 8. (5) Se side 17 i denne Tidende. Denne forordning træder i kraft den 25. august 1999. (6) EFT L 72 af 18. 3. 1988, s. 16. (7) EFT L 289 af 22. 10. 1997, s. 1. L 223/16 DA De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende 24. 8. 1999 Denne medlemsstat. forordning er bindende i alle enkeltheder og gælder umiddelbart i hver Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 23. august 1999. På Kommissionens vegne Karel VAN MIERT Medlem af Kommissionen


title: Reglamento (CE) n° 1831/1999 de la Comisión, de 23 de agosto de 1999, relativo al suministro de azúcar blanco en concepto de ayuda alimentaria

text: 24. 8. 1999 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas L 223/25 REGLAMENTO (CE) No 1831/1999 DE LA COMISIÓN de 23 de agosto de 1999 relativo al suministro de azúcar blanco en concepto de ayuda alimentaria LA COMISIÓN DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS, Visto el Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Europea, Visto el Reglamento (CE) no 1292/96 del Consejo, de 27 de junio de 1996, sobre la política y la gestión de la ayuda alimentaria y de las acciones específicas de apoyo a la seguridad alimentaria (1) y, en particular, la letra b) del apartado 1 de su artículo 24, (1) (2) (3) Considerando que dicho Reglamento establece la lista de los países y organismos que pueden beneficiarse de una ayuda comunitaria y determina los criterios generales relativos al transporte de la ayuda alimentaria más allá de la fase fob; Considerando que, como consecuencia de una decisión relativa a la concesión de ayuda alimentaria, la Comisión ha otorgado azúcar blanco a determinados beneficiarios; Considerando que procede efectuar dicho suministro con arreglo a las normas previstas en el Reglamento (CE) no 2519/97 de la Comisión, de 16 de diciembre de 1997, por el que se establecen las modalidades generales de movilización de productos que deben suministrarse en el marco del Reglamento (CE) no 1292/96 del Consejo en concepto de ayuda alimentaria comuni- taria (2); que es necesario precisar, en particular, los plazos y condiciones de entrega, para determinar los gastos que resulten de ello, HA ADOPTADO EL PRESENTE REGLAMENTO: Artículo 1 En concepto de ayuda alimentaria comunitaria, se procederá a la movilización en la Comunidad de azúcar blanco para sumi- nistrarlo a los beneficiarios que se indican en el anexo, de conformidad con las disposiciones del Reglamento (CE) no 2519/97 y con las condiciones que figuran en el anexo. Se presupone que el licitador tiene conocimiento de todas las condiciones generales y particulares aplicables y que las ha aceptado. No se considerará escrita ninguna otra condición o reserva contenida en su oferta. Artículo 2 El presente Reglamento entrará en vigor el día siguiente al de su publicación en el Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas. El presente Reglamento será obligatorio en todos sus elementos y directamente aplicable en cada Estado miembro. Hecho en Bruselas, el 23 de agosto de 1999. Por la Comisión Karel VAN MIERT Miembro de la Comisión (1) DO L 166 de 5. 7. 1996, p. 1. (2) DO L 346 de 17. 12. 1997, p. 23. L 223/26 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 24. 8. 1999 ANEXO LOTES A y B 1. Acciones nos: 187/98 (A); 188/98 (B) 2. Beneficiario (2): PAM, (World Food Programme), via Cristoforo Colombo 426, I-00145 Roma tel. : (39-6) 6513 2988; fax: 6513 2844/3; telex: 626675 WFP I 3. Representante del beneficiario: deberá ser determinado por el beneficiario 4. País de destino: A: Etiopía; B: Corea del Norte 5. Producto que se moviliza: azúcar blanco 6. Cantidad total (toneladas netas): 315 7. Número de lotes: 2 (A: 115 toneladas; B: 200 toneladas) 8. Características y calidad del producto (3) (5) (8): véase DO C 114 de 29. 4. 1991, p. 1 [V. A 1] 9. Acondicionamiento (7): véase DO C 267 de 13. 9. 1996, p. 1 [11. 2. A 1. b, 2. b y B. 4] 10. Etiquetado o marcado (6): véase DO C 114 de 29. 4. 1991, p. 1 [V. A 3] — Lengua que debe utilizarse para el mercado: — Inscripciones complementarias: — inglés 11. Modo de movilización del producto: azúcar producido en la Comunidad, en el sentido de lo dispuesto en el párrafo sexto del apartado 1 bis del artículo 24 del Reglamento (CEE) no 1785/81 del Consejo (DO 177 de 1. 7. 1981, p. 4) azúcar A o B [letras a) y b)] 12. Fase de entrega prevista: entrega puerto de embarque 13. Fase de entrega alternativa: — 14. a) Puerto de embarque: — b) Dirección de carga: — 15. Puerto de desembarque: — 16. Lugar de destino: — — puerto o almacén de tránsito: — — vía de transporte terrestre: — 17. Período o plazo de entrega en la fase prevista: — 1er plazo del 27. 9 al 17. 10. 1999 — 2o plazo: del 11 al 31. 10. 1999 18. Período o plazo de entrega en la fase alternativa: — 1er plazo: — — 2o plazo: — 19. Plazo para la presentación de ofertas (a las 12 horas, hora de Bruselas): — 1er plazo: el 7. 9. 1999 — 2o plazo: el 21. 9. 1999 20. Importe de la garantía de licitación: 15 EUR por tonelada 21. Dirección para enviar las ofertas y las garantías de licitación (1): Bureau de l'aide alimentaire, Attn. Mr T. Vestergaard Bâtiment Loi 130, bureau 7/46, Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel telex: 25670 AGREC B; fax: (32−2) 296 70 03/296 70 04 (exclusivamente) 22. Restitución a la exportación (4): restitución aplicable al azúcar blanco el 18. 8. 1999, establecida por el Reglamento (CE) no 1777/1999 de la Comisión (DO L 212 de 12. 8. 1999, p. 13) 24. 8. 1999 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas L 223/27 Notas: (1) Informaciones complementarias: André Debongnie (tel. : (32-2) 295 14 65) y, Torben Vestergaard (tel. : (32-2) 299 30 50). (2) El proveedor se pondrá en contacto con el beneficiario o su representante a la mayor brevedad posible, a fin de determinar los documentos de expedición necesarios. (3) El proveedor expedirá al beneficiario un certificado emitido por una instancia oficial que certifique que, para el producto a entregar, se han cumplido las normas en vigor en el Estado miembro de que se trate relativas a la radiación nuclear. El certificado de radiactividad deberá indicar los contenidos en cesio 134 y 137 y en yodo 131. (4) El Reglamento (CE) no 259/98 de la Comisión (DO L 25 de 31. 1. 1998, p. 39), será aplicable en lo relativo a la restitución por exportación. La fecha contemplada en el artículo 2 de Reglamento antes mencionado será la que figura en el punto 22 del presente anexo. El proveedor deberá remitirse al último párrafo del apartado 1 del artículo 4 del citado Reglamento. La copia del certificado será enviada una vez que haya sido aceptada la declaración de exportación [no de fax que habrá de utilizarse: (32 2) 296 20 05)). (5) Al efectuarse la entrega el proveedor transmitirá al beneficiario o a su representante el documento siguiente — certificado sanitario. (6) Por inaplicación excepcional del DO C 114 de 29. 4. 1991, el punto V A 3 c) se sustituirá por el texto siguiente: la inscripción «Comunidad Europea». (7) En previsión de que hubiese que ensacar de nuevo el producto, el proveedor deberá suministrar un 2 % de sacos vacíos de la misma calidad que los contengan la mercancía, con la inscripción seguida de una R mayúscula. (8) La categoría del azúcar se comprobará de manera determinante en aplicación de la norma establecida en el segundo guión de la letra a) del apartado 2 del artículo 18 del Reglamento (CEE) no 2103/77 de la Comisión (DO L 246 de 27. 9. 1977, p. 12), cuya última modificación la constituye el Reglamento (CE) no 260/96 (DO L 34 de 13. 2. 1996, p. 16)