title: PERGUNTA ESCRITA n. 3019/97 do Deputado Amedeo AMADEO à Comissão. Melhorar a produção e a comercialização de mel

eurovoc_concepts:
apiculture
application of EU law
approximation of laws
competence of the Member States
honey
import policy
marketing
production improvement
third country
vocational training

formats: html pdf print

text: C 117/128 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias 16. 4. 98 Resposta de H. Van den Broek em nome da Comissa(cid:152)o (20 de Outubro de 1997) A Comissa(cid:152)o esta· bem consciente do perigo de incidentes nucleares nos pa(cid:14)·ses da Europa Central e Oriental (PECO) e nos Novos Estados Independentes (NEI), tendo afectado cerca de 700 milho(cid:152)es de ecus aos programas de seguran(cid:231)a nuclear Phare e Tacis (1990-1997). Foi recentemente conclu(cid:14)·da e enviada ao Conselho em Junho de 1997 uma avalia(cid:231)a(cid:152)o intercalar dos programas Phare e Tacis efectuada por uma empresa de consultores independentes. Esta avalia(cid:231)a(cid:152)o indica que, apesar de dificuldades de execu(cid:231)a(cid:152)o, a maioria dos projectos de seguran(cid:231)a nuclear esta(cid:152)o a alcan(cid:231)ar os objectivos pretendidos. A Comissa(cid:152)o esta· actualmente a procurar definir as altera(cid:231)o(cid:152)es a introduzir a n(cid:14)·vel das orienta(cid:231)o(cid:152)es gerais e mecanismos de execu(cid:231)a(cid:152)o com vista a aumentar o grau de efica·cia dos programas. Realizaram-se igualmente debates com os Estados-membros, no a(cid:136)mbito dos comite·s Phare e Tacis, e com as comisso(cid:152)es parlamentares relevantes (ambiente, sau·de pu·blica e protec(cid:231)a(cid:152)o dos consumidores, investiga(cid:231)a(cid:152)o, desenvolvimento tecnolo·gico e energia, controlo or(cid:231)amental). A Comissa(cid:152)o esta· prestes a definir a sua posi(cid:231)a(cid:152)o nesta mate·ria com base no resultados obtidos, que sera(cid:152)o integrados no novo ciclo de programa(cid:231)a(cid:152)o, a ter in(cid:14)·cio dentro em breve. (98/C 117/166) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-3019/97 apresentada por Amedeo Amadeo (NI) a‘ Comissa(cid:152)o (1 de Outubro de 1997) Objecto: Melhorar a produ(cid:231)a(cid:152)o e a comercializa(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de mel Tendo em conta a «Proposta de regulamento (CE) do Conselho que estabelece as regras gerais de execu(cid:231)a(cid:152)o para as ac(cid:231)o(cid:152)es destinadas a melhorar a produ(cid:231)a(cid:152)o e a comercializa(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de mel» (COM(96) 596 final › 96/0282 CNS) (1), Podera· a Comissa(cid:152)o indicar se pode incluir nos objectivos priorita·rios os programas de forma(cid:231)a(cid:152)o profissional para os jovens agricultores? (1) JO C 378 de 13. 12. 1996, p. 20. (98/C 117/167) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-3020/97 apresentada por Amedeo Amadeo (NI) a‘ Comissa(cid:152)o (1 de Outubro de 1997) Objecto: Melhorar a produ(cid:231)a(cid:152)o e a comercializa(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de mel Tendo em conta a «Proposta de regulamento (CE) do Conselho que estabelece as regras gerais de execu(cid:231)a(cid:152)o para as ac(cid:231)o(cid:152)es destinadas a melhorar a produ(cid:231)a(cid:152)o e a comercializa(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de mel» (COM(96) 596 final › 96/0282 CNS) (1), Podera· a Comissa(cid:152)o incluir na proposta uma ac(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de luta contra todas as doen(cid:231)as que atingem as abelhas, ac(cid:231)a(cid:152)o esta que na(cid:152)o devera· limitar-se apenas a‘ luta contra a varroose? (1) JO C 378 de 13. 12. 1996, p. 20. (98/C 117/168) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-3021/97 apresentada por Amedeo Amadeo (NI) a‘ Comissa(cid:152)o (1 de Outubro de 1997) Objecto: Melhorar a produ(cid:231)a(cid:152)o e a comercializa(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de mel Tendo em conta a «Proposta de regulamento (CE) do Conselho que estabelece as regras gerais de execu(cid:231)a(cid:152)o para as ac(cid:231)o(cid:152)es destinadas a melhorar a produ(cid:231)a(cid:152)o e comercializa(cid:231)a(cid:152)o do mel» (COM(96)596 final › 96/0282 CNS) (1),


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2979/97 by Christoph KONRAD to the Commission. List of current disputes between the Federal Republic of Germany (especially the 'new Länder') and the Commission (DG IV) over competition

eurovoc_concepts:
European Commission
Federation State
German Democratic Republic
Germany
State aid
aid to undertakings
complaint to the Commission
control of State aid
restriction on competition

text: 30. 4. 98 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 134/47 (98/C 134/57) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-2979/97 fr(cid:229)n Christoph Konrad (PPE) till kommissionen (1 oktober 1997) A¤mne: Fo¤rteckning o¤ver aktuella tvistefr(cid:229)gor mellan Fo¤rbundsrepubliken Tyskland (i synnerhet de (cid:148)nya delstaterna(cid:148)) och kommissionen (DG IV) na¤r det ga¤ller konkurrens Vilket statligt sto¤d fr(cid:229)n Fo¤rbundsrepubliken Tyskland till tyska fo¤retag a¤r fo¤r na¤rvarande fo¤rem(cid:229)l fo¤r 1. kommissionens granskning? Vad exakt a¤r det som granskas, och vilket klagom(cid:229)l a¤r det kommissionen har reagerat p(cid:229), eller a¤r det s(cid:229) att 2. kommissionen genomfo¤r granskningen p(cid:229) eget initiativ? 3. Hur stort a¤r antalet fall med statligt sto¤d till de (cid:148)nya delstaterna(cid:148) ja¤mfo¤rt med till de (cid:148)gamla delstaterna(cid:148)? Vilken tendens kan urskiljas i granskningen b(cid:229)de vad betra¤ffar det finansiella sto¤dets omfattning och 4. antalet fall, i synnerhet vad ga¤ller statligt sto¤d till de (cid:148)nya delstaterna(cid:148), under de senaste (cid:229)ren? Hur avser kommissionen att minska det statliga sto¤det i de (cid:148)nya delstaterna(cid:148) till en acceptabel niv(cid:229), och 5. vilka o¤verenskommelser har ing(cid:229)tts med Tysklands fo¤rbundsregering i det syftet? 6. Vilken st(cid:229)ndpunkt intar de o¤vriga medlemsstaterna till denna situation? Svar fr(cid:229)n Karel Van Miert p(cid:229) kommissionens va¤gnar (29 oktober 1997) 1. Fo¤r na¤rvarande behandlar kommissionen 59 a¤renden som ga¤ller huruvida sto¤d som beviljas av Tyskland a¤r fo¤renliga med den gemensamma marknaden. Sto¤dprogram och sto¤d inom jordbruk, fiske och transport omfattas inte. Av de 59 a¤rendena ga¤ller 43 de nya delstaterna och 16 de gamla. Sammanlagt har ett fo¤rfarande enligt artikel 93. 2 i EG-fo¤rdraget inletts i 23 a¤renden, varav 17 ga¤ller de nya delstaterna och 6 de gamla. 2. En fo¤rteckning o¤ver en del av de a¤renden i vilka ett fo¤rfarande inletts har la¤mnats till parlamentsledamoten och parlamentets sekretariat. Av fo¤rteckningen framg(cid:229)r vad fo¤rfarandena ga¤ller. Kommissionen reagerar b(cid:229)de p(cid:229) klagom(cid:229)l fr(cid:229)n konkurrenter till sto¤dmottagande fo¤retag och p(cid:229) information i medierna. Fo¤r att svara p(cid:229) denna fr(cid:229)ga har det antal a¤renden som hittills avgjorts under 1997 anva¤nts som en indikator. 3. Sammanlagt har 51 beslut ga¤llt de nya delstaterna och 14 de gamla. 4. En noggrann bedo¤mning kra¤vs fo¤r att svara p(cid:229) denna fr(cid:229)ga. Fram till och med den 31 december 1995 tilla¤mpades olika s. k. Treuhandordningar efter varandra. P(cid:229) grund av dessa generella tillst(cid:229)nd behandlade kommissionen endast n(cid:229)gra av de viktigaste a¤rendena. Ur statistisk synvinkel fo¤refaller da¤rfo¤r antalet a¤renden stiga, och under de fo¤rsta sju m(cid:229)naderna 1997 fattade kommissionen na¤stan sex g(cid:229)nger fler beslut a¤n under hela 1995. Da¤remot visar sto¤dens omfattning en statistiskt sjunkande tendens. Denna statistik p(cid:229)verkas dock av enskilda a¤renden, som t. ex. a¤rendet BUNA (cid:229)r 1995 som ga¤llde sto¤d p(cid:229) na¤rmare 10 miljarder tyska mark. ¯r 1997 fattade kommissionen beslut om sto¤d till de nya delstaterna som uppgick till 3,18 miljarder tyska mark. 5. Sedan den 1 januari 1996 tilla¤mpar kommissionen de allma¤nna reglerna om statligt sto¤d p(cid:229) de nya delstaterna. B(cid:229)de kommissionen och den tyska regeringen har o¤kat sina personalresurser fo¤r att kunna hantera den o¤kade arbetsbo¤rda som blivit fo¤ljden av att de allma¤nna reglerna om statligt sto¤d tilla¤mpas p(cid:229) de nya delstaterna. De o¤vriga medlemsstaterna har inte blivit tillfr(cid:229)gade i denna sak. Kommissionen kan dock inom ramen fo¤r 6. sin verksamhet konstatera att de o¤vriga medlemsstaterna i allma¤nhet sto¤der dess handlingssa¤tt och fo¤rslag


title: Digest of statistics on social protection in Europe : Old age and survivors: An update.

eurovoc_concepts:
elderly person
social security
social survey


title: INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA n. 3042/97 dell'on. Amedeo AMADEO alla Commissione. Libro bianco ferrovie

eurovoc_concepts:
closing of accounts
debt
financial management
liberalisation of the market
modernisation aid
rail transport
transport infrastructure

text: 30. 4. 98 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunita‘ europee C 134/63 (98/C 134/78) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-3036/97 di Amedeo Amadeo (NI) alla Commissione (1o ottobre 1997) Oggetto: Tassazione autoveicoli pesanti Vista la «Proposta di direttiva del Consiglio relativa alla tassazione a carico di autoveicoli pesanti adibiti al trasporto di merci su strada per l(cid:146)uso di talune infrastrutture» (COM(96)331 def. › 96/0182 SYN) (1), si richiama l(cid:146)attenzione sul fatto che attualmente nell(cid:146)Unione europea l(cid:146)approccio che prevale in materia d(cid:146)imposizione fiscale sui carburanti si basa su elementi piu‘ di politica fiscale che di politica dei trasporti, in quanto le accise sui carburanti restano e resteranno un(cid:146)importante risorsa. Intende la Commissione instaurare una reale coerenza tra le tasse indirette, frutto della politica fiscale, e le tasse dirette sull(cid:146)uso delle infrastrutture e la copertura dei costi esterni, che rientra nella politica dei trasporti? (1) GU C 59 del 26. 2. 1997, pag. 9 Risposta data dal sig. Kinnock in nome della Commissione (12 novembre 1997) La Commissione ritiene ammissibile che le accise sui combustibili vengano utilizzate dagli Stati membri in primo luogo per assicurarsi un maggior gettito. Tuttavia, nella proposta di direttiva che ristruttura il quadro comunitario per l(cid:146)imposizione dei prodotti energetici (1), la Commissione riconosce che gli Stati membri ricorrono alle accise sui carburanti anche per perseguire altri obiettivi nell(cid:146)ambito delle politiche nazionali nel settore ambientale, dei trasporti e dell(cid:146)energia. La Commissione riconosce inoltre la necessita‘ che le imposte dirette e indirette che gravano sui singoli utenti in relazione all(cid:146)uso che essi fanno della rete stradale siano inquadrate in un sistema impositivo coerente. Di conseguenza, nella recente proposta di direttiva del Consiglio relativa all(cid:146)imposizione dei prodotti energetici, la Commissione prevede una disposizione specifica che consentirebbe agli Stati membri di applicare ai carburanti per motori livelli inferiori a quelli minimi specificati nella direttiva stessa, in concomitanza con l(cid:146)introduzione o la modifica di sistemi d’imposizione specifici al trasporto su strada connessi con il recupero dei costi infrastrutturali e ambientali e di quelli legati al traffico. (1) GU C 139 del 6. 5. 1997. (98/C 134/79) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-3042/97 di Amedeo Amadeo (NI) alla Commissione (1o ottobre 1997) Oggetto: Libro bianco ferrovie Nel parere del Comitato economico e sociale sul Libro bianco «Strategie di rilancio delle ferrovie comunitarie» (COM(96)421 def. ) (1), al riguardo di debiti pregressi, risanamento della situazione finanziaria e infrastrutture, l(cid:146)autonomia della gestione commerciale e‘ indicata come un fattore strategico essenziale della liberalizzazione delle ferrovie perseguita dal Libro bianco. Una condizione fondamentale per raggiungere tale scopo, e con cio‘ realizzare la direttiva 91/440/CEE (2) per lo sviluppo delle ferrovie comunitarie, e‘ rappresentata dalla riduzione dei debiti pregressi. E(cid:146) vero che tale riduzione e‘ avvenuta in maniera incompleta e disuguale nei vari Stati? La Commissione intende porvi rimedio con sollecitudine? (1) GU C 206 del 7. 7. 1997, pag. 23 (2) GU L 237 del 24. 8. 1991, pag. 25


title: Proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) establishing new rules on aid to shipbuilding

eurovoc_concepts:
OECD
State aid
competition policy
control of State aid
shipbuilding

text: mm 1. J • H IE II « • a mm m COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 01. 10. 1997 COM(97) 469fmal 9 7/ 0248(CNS) 9 7/ 0249(CNS) Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) amending Council Regulation 3094/95 thereby further prolonging the relevant provisions of the Seventh Council Directive on aid to Shipbuilding Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) establishing new rules on aid to shipbuilding (presented by the Commission) Commission proposal for a Council Regulation amending Council Regulation 3094/95 thereby further prolonging the relevant provisions of the Seventh Council Directive on aid to Shipbuilding , , Explanatory Memorandum. ' 97/ 0248CCNS) l. Introduction 1. 1 1. 2 1. 3 1. 4 In 1994 an international agreement was concluded within the framework of OECD respecting normal competitive conditions in the commercial shipbuilding and shiprepair industry. The agreement had been due to enter into force on 1 January 1996. Council regulation 3094/95 of 22 December 1995 on aid to shipbuilding is intended to give effect to the State aid provisions of the OECD agreement. Article 10 of the regulation provided that the regulation shall apply as from the date of entry into force of the OECD agreement with the relevant provisions of the shipbuilding aid directive (Directive 90/684/EEC, as most recently amended by Directive 94/73/EC) continuing to apply ad interim and until 1 October 1996 at the latest. However because of continuing delays in the entry into force of the OECD agreement due to the failure of the US to ratify, Council Regulation 1904/96 further prolonged the directive until 31 December 1997. Having reviewed the situation at its meeting on 24 April 1997, the Industry Council agreed that if the OECD agreement was not going to enter into force a specific new aid regime for shipbuilding should be established. In the meantime the seventh directive should be extended until 31 December 1998 on the understanding that the prolonged directive would lapse automatically as soon as the OECD agreement is ratified by the US or as soon as a new regime on shipbuilding is adopted. The Commission was invited to submit proposals accordingly. Since there remain uncertainties over the entry into force of the agreement, this paper reviews the situation and puts forward proposals for an extension of the directive until 31 December 1998. Proposals for a new aid regime to replace the directive are the subject of a separate communication being submitted in parallel with the present proposal. 2. OECD agreement 2. 1 Under the OECD agreement, generally all measures of support for shipbuilding are prohibited except for aid for research and development, social aid related to closures; export credits complying with the revised 1994 OECD understanding on export credits for ships; and domestic credits for ships under equivalent terms and conditions. 1 C O M ( 9 7 ) X XX 2. 2 Although the European Union, Korea, Norway and Japan have ratified the agreement, the ratification of the USA is still awaited. The prospects of when the US will ratify are uncertain at this stage. 2. 3 The early entry into force of the OECD agreement is vitally important if a normalisation of world shipbuilding market is to be achieved. By ratifying, the Community has already signalled its commitment to the agreement. However, so long as other parties to the agreement have not ratified and continue to maintain subsidies and other market-distortive measures, it would be inappropriate for the European Union unilaterally to dismantle its aid arrangements. 3. Proposal ' 3. 1 In the light of the above it is proposed that if necessary the Community should maintain the rules of the directive until 31 December 1998 should there bè a continuing delay in the entry into force of the OECD agreement. In that event, since new measures of support are prohibited by the "standstill" provisions of the Final Act of the negotiations concluding the OECD agreement, provisions which the Council has confirmed it considers binding, the rules of the directive would be maintained unchanged. This would include the level of the production aid ceiling. 4. Conclusion 4. 1 Accordingly, it is proposed that the Council adopts, after consultation of the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, the attached amendment to Regulation 3094/95 providing for its entry into force as from the date of entry into force of the OECD agreement, with the relevant provisions of the shipbuilding directive continuing to apply ad interim and until 31 December 1998 at the latest. 4. 2 In order to avoid any legal vacuum the Council should take a decision before 31 December 1997. Proposai for a Council Regulation amending Council Regulation 3094/95 on aid to shipbuilding THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 92(3)(e), 94 and 113 thereof; Having regard to the proposal from the Commission; Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament; Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee; Whereas, an agreement respecting normal competitive conditions in the commercial shipbuilding and repair industry concluded between the European Community and certain third countries within the framework of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) , has still not yet entered into force. Whereas, therefore Council Regulation 3094/95 of 22 December 1995 on aid to shipbuilding has not yet entered into force. Whereas, in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation 3094/95, as amended by Council Regulation 1904/964 the relevant rules of Council Directive 90/684/EEC on aid to shipbuilding continue to apply ad interim, pending the entry into force of the OECD agreement and until 31 December 1997 at the latest; Whereas given the continuing uncertainties over entry into force of the OECD agreement, which may be further delayed beyond 31 December 1997, the Council needs to take appropriate steps pending decisions on a possible new aid arrangements; Whereas Regulation 3094/95 should therefore be modified, HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION Article 1 The third paragraph of Article 10 of Regulation 3094/95 shall be replaced by the following: Pending the entry into force of the said Agreement, the relevant provisions of Directive 90/684/EEC shall apply until the Agreement enters into force and until 31 December 1998 at the latest. O JC 3 7 5 , 3 0. 1 2. 1 9 9 4 , p3 3 OJ L 3 3 2 , 3 1. 1 2. 1 9 9 5 , pl 4 OJ L 2 5 1 , 3. 1 0. 1 9 9 6 , p5 5 OJ L 3 8 0 , 3 1. 1 2 ; 1 9 9 0 , p 27 fi , Artick 2 This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Commission proposal for a Council Regulation establishing new rules on aid to shipbuilding 9 7/ 02A9(CMS) Explanatory Memorandum Introduction In 1994 an international agreement was concluded within the framework of OECD respecting normal competitive conditions in the commercial shipbuilding and shiprepair industry. The agreement had been due to enter into force on 1 January 1996, but has not yet done so due to delays in US ratification of the agreement. » Council Regulation 3094/95 of 22 December 1995 on aid to shipbuilding is intended to give effect to the state aid provisions of the OECD agreement. Under these provisions generally all measures of support for shipbuilding would be prohibited except for aid for research and development; social aid linked to closures and ship financing credits complying with the revised 1994 Understanding on Export Credits for Ships. Article 10 of the regulation provided that the regulation shall apply as from the date of entry into force of the OECD agreement with the relevant provisions of the shipbuilding aid directive (Directive 90/684/EEC) continuing to apply ad interim and until 1 October 1996 at the latest. However because of the continuing delays in the entry into force of the OECD agreement, Council Regulation 1904/96 further prolonged the directive until 31 December 1997. Having reviewed the situation at its meeting on 24 April 1997, the Industry Council agreed that if the OECD agreement was not going to enter into force a specific new aid regime for shipbuilding should be established. In the meantime the seventh directive should be extended until 31 December 1998 on the understanding that the prolonged directive would lapse automatically as soon as the OECD agreement is ratified by the US or as soon as a new regime on shipbuilding is adopted. The Commission was invited to submit proposals accordingly. Since there remain uncertainties over the entry into force of the OECD agreement, this paper puts forward proposals for a new aid regime should the need arise. Proposals for an extension of the directive up until 31 December 1998 in the meantime are the subject of a separate communication being submitted at the same time as the present proposal. The proposals for a new aid regime should be seen within the context of wider shipbuilding policy and in particular the Commission's parallel communication to the Council outlining new orientations airned at improving the competitiveness of the sector. 1. 1. 1 1. 2 1. 3 1. 4 1. 5 6 COM(97)XXXX 7 'Towards a New Shipbuilding Policy' COM(97)XXXX 2. Existing State Aid Rules 2. 1 The seventh Directive maintains the policy established by the sixth Directive, adopted in 1986 against a background of abnormally difficult market conditions, caused by a declining demand for ships and a rapid increase in shipbuilding capacities, particularly in the Far East, leading to a significant imbalance between supply and demand and depressed prices. The main aim of the directive has been: to safeguard the Community shipbuilding industry by providing a defensive instrument against perceived unfair competition through. injurious pricing below costs, thereby maintaining a sufficient level of Community shipbuilding activity in those market segments where the Community could remain competitive under, normal market conditions, such as less labour-intensive, technologically complex specialised ships; and to encourage the necessary structural adjustment of EC shipbuilding toward these directions; to provide, in accordance with the aims of the internal market, a level playing field so that intra-Community competition in shipbuilding is carried out on a fair, transparent and equitable basis. 2. 2 Under the Directive operating aid for shipbuilding and ship conversions, (but not ship repair) may be granted, up to a common maximum aid ceiling which reflects the difference between the costs of the most competitive Community yards and market prices of their main international competitors, with particular regard to those market segments in which Community shipbuilders remain relatively most competitive. In accordance with the principle of degressivity established by the Directive, the ceiling, which was 28% in 1987, has been progressively reduced to 9% currently (4. 5% for smaller vessels and conversions). The only operating aids exempted from the ceiling are credit facilities complying with the 1981 OECD Understanding on Export Credits for Ships and aid granted as development assistance to developing countries. 2. 3 The Directive also lays down rules for investment aids within the framework of restructuring which must be linked to a restructuring plan which does not involve any increase in the yard's shipbuilding capacity or which must be directly linked to a corresponding irreversible reduction in capacity of other yards in the Member State concerned; aid for closures on condition that the resulting capacity reduction is of a genuine and irreversible nature (with the facilities having to remain closed for not less than 5 years; and not being reopened within a further 5 years after the 5 years, i. e. for a total of 10 years, without the Commission's prior approval); and aid for research and development In addition the directive imposes notification and reporting obligations on Member States in order that the Commission can monitor compliance with the rules. 2. 4 In the Commission's view the Directive has been generally effective and largely achieved its aims, enabling the Community broadly to maintain its world market share in recent years at around 20%. However the industry is still in difficulty, with depressed prices for newbuildings and repairs world-wide. Despite the improvements made in recent years, many EU yards still lack competitiveness, in particular lagging behind their major Far East competitors in terms of productivity. The world 2. 5 2. 6 2. 7 shipbuilding market is likely to become even more competitive in the medium term with overall demand starting to soften in the next decade, and Japanese and Korean yards continuing to make further major improvements in their productivity. The main pillar of the current aid policy has been operating aid. Initially, through the progressive reduction in the aid ceiling, operating aid encouraged changes towards greater competitiveness. However the necessary impetus has not been sustained in more recent years as the level of the ceiling became static, coupled with the uncertainty over the OECD agreement. Overall the aid has served to cushion yards from the full rigours of the market. Operating aid also results in significant costs for most Member States, many of which face growing budgetary constraints Shipbuilding is the only sector of manufacturing industry which systematically benefits from such aids and it is questionable whether the expenditure involved represents a cost-effective use of limited public resources. Furthermore given the extent to which competition is between EU yards the aid has tended to distort competition within the common market, particularly since there has been a wide variations in the actual levels of aid granted by the Member States, undermining the aim of establishing a level playing field. Against this background, state aid policy needs to be refocussed to promote and underpin efforts to improve the competitiveness of the industry. This implies shifting away from operating aid to other forms of support, such as investment aid for innovation, better geared towards helping industry achieve the necessary changes and overcome its weaknesses. 3. Proposals for Future Aid Policy 3. 1 3. 2 The attached proposed Council Regulation sets out the Commission's proposals for a new aid regime to replace the seventh directive, by the latest upon its proposed expiry at the end of 1998 but preferably sooner. The following briefly summarises the key elements and the main changes from previous policy. So far as operating aid is concerned, there are some arguments for proposing its immediate abolition upon entry into force of the proposed regulation. Industry has already had plenty of time to adjust to the possibility of operating "without such aids since it had been expected that the OECD agreement(which prohibits these aids) had been expected to enter into force on 1 January 1996. However since then there has been some uncertainty over the direction of future policy in the light of the delays in the US ratification of the agreement and it therefore seems appropriate to provide a short, and final, transitional period during which contract-related operating aid, at current aid ceilings, should continue. It is proposed that this transitional period expire on 31 December 2000 (Article 3. 1 refers). Since the Community still believes that the OECD agreement represents the best option, this will also allow time to facilitate further efforts to bring that agreement into force. 3. 3 One year before the abolition of operating aid the Community will monitor the market situation and appraise whether European yards are affected by anti competitive practices. If it is" established at that or a later stage that industry is 3. 4 3. 5 3. 6 3. 7 / 3. 8 being caused injury by anti-competitive practices including injurious pricing, the Community will consider introducing appropriate measures the only contract-related aid allowed will be home and As from 1 January 2001 export credits in conformity with OECD rules on Export Credits for Ships, which until 31 December 2000 will, as at present, not be counted under the aid ceiling(Article 3. 4 refers). Since the 1981 OECD Understanding on Export Credits remains in force at present, the Commission considers itself obliged at this stage to propose that the provisions of that Understanding should continue to apply. However the Commission recognises that certain provisions of the 1994 OECD Understanding on Export Credits for Ships, which has not yet entered into force, more closely reflect market realities and that therefore it might be more appropriate to introduce them in the new regime. The technical and legal issues involved require further examination. Other forms of operating aid, ie non-contract-related aid (such as loss compensation, rescue aid etc) shall be subject to specific new rules on restructuring aid (see paragraph 3. 8 below). It is proposed that contract-related aid granted in the form of development assistance to developing countries should • continue to be permitted (Article 3. 5 refers), notwithstanding Commission concerns that such aid, used by only a very few Member States, may be used as an operating aid to keep yards in business and thus have undesirable effects on competition within the EU. However since this type of aid is permitted under OECD rules it would unfairly disadvantage EU yards vis à vis their international competitors if their possibilities of such aid were closed off. Nevertheless the Commission proposes stricter rules requiring aid offers to be open to bids from different yards and closer monitoring to ensure that there are no abuses. Closure aid (Article 4) continues to be needed to facilitate the further structural adjustment of the sector that will inevitably be necessary, in particular social aids to mitigate the social repercussions of adjustment and aids to cover other normal expenditure occasioned by total or partial closures, both of which can also increase competitiveness of the undertakings concerned when partial closures are involved. However in order to ensure that possible distortions to intra-EU competition are minimised it is essential that the resulting capacity reductions are genuine and irreversible. In that context under the current rules closed facilities must remain closed for a period of 5 years and may not reopen for a further period of another 5 years without the Commission's prior approval. Given the continuing imbalance between supply and demand on the world shipbuilding market and the perspectives for the future it is very difficult to foresee circumstances where it would be appropriate for the Commission to approve the reopening of closed facilities in the second 5 year period. Accordingly it is proposed that closed facilities should not return to shipbuilding for a period of 10 years, with no possibility of review after the first 5 years has elapsed. form of aid necessary for structural adjustment and improved Another competitiveness is restructuring aid. The seventh directive has a lacuna in this respect in that its relevant provisions focus on investment aids rather than other forms of restructuring aid like capital injections, debt write-offs, subsidised loans, rescue aid etc. It is proposed that there should be specific rules in the proposed new regime (Article 5 refers) based on the general Community guidelines for such aids. Furthermore, drawing on experience from past restructuring cases in the shipbuilding sector, the Commission proposes that there should in particular be very strict rules applying the 'one time/last time' principle, with rigorous assessment and monitoring of viability programmes. 3. 9 A key element in the Commission's assessment of restructuring aid cases will be the nature and extent of the capacity reductions required as the necessary counterpart for the aid to minimise, its distortive effects on the common market. In order to ensure that the capacity reductions are real and genuinely will have an effect on the beneficiary's position on the market, the Commission proposes that the determining factor will be the level of production in the preceding 5 years rather than the notional capacity of the yard. 3. 10 So far as investment aid is concerned, the Commission fully recognises the role that investment has to play in helping EU yards make significant improvements in their productivity and thus increase their competitiveness. At the same time it is important that measures of support do not unduly distort competition within the common market. Under the approach proposed there would be a differentiation between investment aids for innovation (Article 6) and regional investment aids for upgrading and modernising yards (Article 7). 3. 11 The Commission's general policy towards investment aids has been to adopt a strict attitude towards such aids for modernisation and upgrading facilities since such activities are normally undertaken by companies themselves, financed by their own resources or by commercial loans, as part of normal company operations in a competitive market environment. However the Commission acknowledges that such aids can make a valuable contribution towards overcoming structural handicaps in disadvantaged regions. It is therefore proposed that such aids granted under regional aid schemes may be allowed provided that the aided project is to improve the productivity of existing installations. 3. 12 Innovation is a key element in improving competitiveness. To promote greater innovation, which carries a higher degree of industrial and technological risk, the Commission is proposing to allow for incentives to be given provided that the project relates to innovative products and processes that are not currently used commercially by other EU operators in the shipbuilding sector. 3. 13 Research and development(R&D) is another valuable way of promoting medium to longer term competitiveness of the industry. Accordingly it is proposed that aid for R&D should continue to be allowed in accordance with the Community framework on aid for research and developmentArticle 8 refers). In addition, in order that the shipbuilding industry should have the same treatment as all other industrial sectors it is proposed that aid for environmental protection in accordance with Community guidelines should also be allowed(Article 9 refers). 3. 14 Finally, in order to ensure the fullest transparency and to enable the Commission closely to control aid, it is proposed that the current strict rules on notification and certain monitoring improvements(Articles 10 and 11). be maintained arrangements subject should to 10 3. 15 As the proposal concerns significant changes to the existing rules, it is proposed that the Regulation should apply for a five year period until the end of 2003 in order to allow sufficient time for the new strategy to produce a structural effect in the sector. 4. Conclusion 4. 1 Accordingly, it is proposed that the Council adopts, after consultation of the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, the attached regulation for a new shipbuilding aid regime to replace, by 31 December 1998 at the latest, the proposed prolongation until that date of the seventh directive on aid to shipbuilding, in the event that the OECD agreement has still not entered into force. 11 Proposal for a Council Regulation on aid to Shipbuilding THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 92(3)(e), 94 and 113 thereof; Having regard to the proposal from the Commission; Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament; Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee; Whereas, an agreement respecting normal competitive conditions in the commercial Shipbuilding and repair industry concluded between the European Community and certain third countries within the framework of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and development (OECD), has still not entered into force because of the failure of the US to ratify the agreement; Whereas, therefore Council Regulation 3094/95 of 22 December 19959 on aid to shipbuilding has not yet entered into force; Whereas, in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation 3094/95, as most recently amended by Council /9710, the relevant rules of Council Directive 90/684/EEC11 will continue to apply, in Regulation the absence of entry into force of the OECD agreement, until 31 December 1998 at the latest; Whereas, a satisfactory balance between supply and demand on the world shipbuilding has still not been fully established so that prices remain depressed; and whereas the competitive pressures on European Union shipbuilders are expected to grow further as overall ship demand after the year 2000 is predicted to fall and available world shipbuilding capacity is expected to continue to rise; Whereas, although European Union yards have made progress in improving competitiveness, the rate at which they are improving productivity needs to be increased in order to close the gap with their international competitors, particularly in Japan and Korea; Whereas, a competitive shipbuilding industry is important to the Community and contributes to its economic and social development by providing a substantial market for a range of industries and by maintaining employment in a number of regions, many of which are already suffering a high rate of unemployment; Whereas, a complete abolition of aid to the sector is not yet possible in view of the difficult market situation and the need to encourage yards to make the necessary changes to improve competitiveness; whereas, a tight and selective aid policy should be continued in order to support these efforts and in order to ensure fair and uniform conditions for intra-Community competition; whereas, such a policy constitutes the most appropriate approach in terms of ensuring the maintenance of a sufficient level of activity in European shipyards and, thereby, the survival of an efficient and competitive European shipbuilding industry; 8 OJ No C375, 30 December 1994, p3 9 OJ No L332, 30 December 1995, pi 10 " OJ No L380, 31 December 1990; p27 12 Whereas, the European Community's aid policy for the shipbuilding sector has remained essentially unchanged since 1987; whereas, that policy has generally achieved its objectives but requires adaptations so that it is better able to address the future challenges facing the industry; Whereas, in particular operating aid is not the most cost-effective way of encouraging the European shipbuilding industry to improve its competitiveness; whereas, accordingly operating aid should be phased out and the focus shifted more towards other forms of support to promote the necessary improvements in competitiveness, such as investment aids for innovation; Whereas, operating aid will therefore end on 31 December 2000; Whereas, one year before that date the Community will monitor the market situation and appraise whether European yards are affected by anti-competitive practices. If it is established at that or a later stage that industry is being caused injury by anti-competitive practices including injurious pricing, the Community will consider introducing appropriate measures; Whereas, operating aid in the form of development assistance to developing countries should continue subject to stricter conditions; Whereas, a clearer distinction is needed between investment aid and restructuring aid; whereas the latter should only be granted exceptionally and subject to strict rules, such as applying the principle of 'one time/last time', requiring genuine capacity reductions as a counterpart for the aid and tighter monitoring procedures; and whereas the former should be allowed only under regional aid schemes provided that the project is to improve the productivity of existing installations; Whereas, investment aid for innovation should be allowed provided that it is for genuinely innovative projects that will improve competitiveness; whereas aid for research and development and aid for environmental protection should also be permitted so that the shipbuilding industry is not deprived of these aid possibilities that are available to all other industrial sectors; and whereas, closure aid should continue to be allowed to facilitate structural adjustment; Whereas, although it is proposed to continue to treat ship conversion in the same way as shipbuilding to a certain extent, aid to the shiprepair sector should continue not to be permitted except for restructuring, closure, investments under regional aid schemes, innovation, research and development, and environmental protection; Whereas, close and transparent monitoring is necessary if the aid policy is to be effective; Whereas, the provisions of this Regulation are without prejudice to any amendments necessary to comply with international commitments of the Community concerning state aid to the shipbuilding industry, HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION 13 Article I For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions shall apply: (a) • 4 • • • • "self-propelled seagoing commercial vessels" are: vessels of not less than 100 gt used for the transportation of passengers and/or goods; vessels of not less than 100 gt for the performance of a specialised service (for example dredgers and ice breakers); tugs of not less than 365 kW; fishing vessels of not less than 100 gt for export outside the Community; unfinished shells of the abovementioned vessels that are afloat and mobile; and floating storage and offloading vessels (FSOs), floating production storage and offloading vessels (FPSOs), floating production drilling storage and offloading vessels(FPDSOs), and derivatives thereof, if the completed vessel has a maximum designed speed when under its own power of more than 6 knots in any direction. For the purposes of the above "self-propelled seagoing vessel" means a vessel that, by means of its permanent propulsion and. steering, has all the characteristics of self-navigability on the high seas. Military vessels(ie vessels which according to their basic structural characteristics and capability are' specifically intended to be used exclusively for military purposes such as warships and other vessels for offensive or defensive action) and modifications made or features added to other vessels exclusively for military purposes shall be excluded, provided that any measures or practices applied in respect of such vessels, modifications or features are not disguised actions taken in favour of commercial shipbuilding inconsistent with this Regulation; (b) (c) (d) (e) "shipbuilding" shall mean the building, in the Community, of self-propelled seagoing commercial vessels, as defined in (a); "ship repair" shall mean the repair or reconditioning in the Community of self-propelled seagoing commercial vessels, as defined in (a); "ship conversion" shall mean the conversion, in the Community, of self-propelled seagoing commercial vessels, as defined in (a), of not less than 1000 gt, on condition that conversion operations entail radical alterations to the cargo plan, the shell, the propulsion system or the passenger accommodation; "aid" shall mean State aid within the meaning of Articles 92 and 93 of the Treaty. This shall include not only aid granted by the State itself but also that granted by regional or local authorities or other public bodies and any aid elements contained in financing measures taken directly or indirectly by Member States in respect of shipbuilding, conversion or repair undertakings which cannot be regarded as a genuine provision of risk capital according to standard investment practice in a market economy; (f) "contract value before aid" shall mean the price laid down in the contract plus any aid granted directly to the yard; (g) "related entity" shall mean any natural or legal person who: 14 (i) owns or controls an undertaking engaged in shipbuilding, ship conversion or ship repair; or (ii) is owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, whether through stock ownership or otherwise, by an undertaking engaged in shipbuilding, ship conversion or ship repair. Control shall be presumed to arise once a person or undertaking engaged in shipbuilding, ship conversion or ship repair owns or controls an interest of more than 25% in the other or vice versa. Article 2 Aid granted, whether directly or indirectly, for shipbuilding, conversion and repair, as defined under this Regulation, financed oy Member States or their regional or local authorities or through State resources in any form whatsoever may be considered compatible with the common market only if it complies with the provisions of this Regulation. This provision applies not only to aid granted to undertakings engaged in such activities but also to related entities. For the purposes of this Regulation aids granted indirectly include all forms of aid to, shipowners or to third parties which are available as aid for the building or conversion of ships such as credit facilities, guarantees and tax concessions. Concerning tax concessions, these provisions shall be without prejudice to the Community guidelines on state aid to maritime transport and in particular point 3. 1 thereof, as currently set out in Official Journal of the European Communities No C 205 of 5 July 1997, and any amendments thereto. No aid granted pursuant to this Regulation may be conditional upon discriminatory practices against products originating in other Member States. In particular aid granted by a Member State to its shipowners or to third parties in that State for the building or conversion of ships may not distort or threaten to distort competition between shipyards in the Member State and shipyards in other Member States in the placing of orders. CHAPTER IX CONTRACT - RELATED OPERATING AID Article 3 1. Until 31 December 2000, production aid in support of contracts for shipbuilding and shipconversion, but not shiprepair, may be considered compatible with the common market provided that the total amount of all forms of aid granted in support of any individual contract(including the grant equivalent of any aid granted to. the shipowner or third parties) does not exceed, in grant equivalent, a common maximum aid ceiling expressed as a percentage of the contract value before aid. For shipbuilding contracts with a contract value before aid of more than ECU 10 million the ceiling shall be 9%; in all other cases the ceiling shall be 4. 5%. 2. The aid ceiling applicable to a contract shall be that in force at the date of signature of the final contract. However, this rule shall not apply in respect of any ship delivered more than three years from the date of signing of the final contract. In such cases, the ceiling applicable to that 15 contract shall be that in force three years before the date of delivery of the ship. The Commission may however grant an extension of the three-year delivery limit when this is found justified by the technical complexity of the individual shipbuilding project concerned or by delays resulting from unexpected disruptions of a substantial and defensible nature in the working programme of a yard due to exceptional circumstances, unforeseeable and external to the company. 3. The grant of aid in individual cases in application of an approved aid scheme shall not require prior notification to, or authorisation from, the Commission. However, where there is competition between different Member States for a particular contract, the Commission shall require prior notification of the relevant aid proposals at the request of any Member State. In such cases, the Commission shall adopt a position within 30 days of notification; such proposals may not be implemented before the Commission has given its authorisation. By its decision in such cases the Commission shall ensure that the planned aid does not affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest. Aid in the form of state supported credit facilities granted to national and non-national shipowners or third parties for the building or conversion of vessels may be deemed compatible with the common market and shall not be counted within the ceiling if it complies with the terms of OECD Council resolution of 3 August 1981 ( OECD Understanding on Export credits for Ships) or with any agreement amending or replacing that Understanding. Aid related to shipbuilding and ship conversion granted as development assistance to a developing country shall not be subject to the ceiling. It may be deemed compatible with the common market if it complies with the terms laid down for that purpose by OECD Working Party 6 in its Agreement concerning the interpretation of Articles 6 to 8 of the Understanding referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article or with any later addendum or corrigendum to the said Understanding. The Commission must be given prior notification of any such individual aid proposal. It shall verify the particular development content of the proposed aid and satisfy itself that it falls within the scope of the Understanding referred to in the first subparagraph and that the offer of development assistance is open to bids' from different yards. CHAPTER m RESTRUCTURING AND CLOSURE AID Article 4 Aid for Closures Aid to defray the normal costs resulting from the total or partial closure of shipbuilding, conversion or repair yards may be considered compatible with the common market provided that the resulting capacity reduction is of a genuine and irreversible nature. The costs eligible for the aid referred to in paragraph 1 are: payments to workers made redundant or retired before legal retirement age; the costs of counselling services to workers made or to be made redundant or retired before legal retirement age, including payments made by shipyards to facilitate the creation of small 16 4. 5. 1. 2. enterprises which are independent of the shipyards in question and whose activities are not principally shipbuilding, conversion or repair; payments to workers for vocational retraining; expenditure incurred for the redevelopment of the yard(s), its buildings, installations and infrastructure for use other than that specified in Article 1 (b) - (d). 3. In addition, in the case of undertakings which totally cease shipbuilding, conversion or repair the following measures may also be deemed compatible with the common market: 4. 5. 1. aid of an amount not exceeding the higher of the following two values, as determined by an independent consultant's report : the residual book value of the installations, ignoring that portion of any revaluation since 1 January 1991 that exceeds the national inflation rate, or the discounted value of the contribution to fixed costs obtainable from the installations over a three year period(less any advantages the aided undertaking derives from their closure); aid such as loans or loan guarantees for working capital needed to enable the undertaking to complete unfinished works provided that this is kept to the minimum necessary and a significant proportion of the work has already been done. The amount and intensity of aid must be justified by the extent of the closures involved, account being taken of the structural problems of the region concerned and, in the case of conversion to other industrial activities, of the Community legislation and rules applicable to those new activities. In order to establish the irreversible nature of aided closures, the Member State concerned shall ensure that the closed shipbuilding, conversion and repair facilities remain closed for a period of not less than ten years. Article 5 Restructuring aid Aid for rescue and restructuring of undertakings in difficulties, including capital injections, debt write-offs, subsidised loans, loss compensation and guarantees, may exceptionally be considered compatible with the common market provided that it complies with the general Community guidelines on state aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty, as currently set out in Official Journal of the European Communities No C 368 of 23 December 1994, and any amendments thereto, and in particular in relation to restructuring it fulfils the following specific conditions: the undertaking has not been granted any such aid pursuant to Council Regulation 1013/97 of 2 Junel99712; the amount and intensity of the aid is limited to the strict minimum necessary; there is a viable restructuring plan that will restore the long-term viability of the undertaking within a. reasonable time scale; the aid is a one-off operation, with clear and unequivocal undertakings from the Member State concerned that no further aid will be granted to the undertaking or its legal successors in the future; the aid shall not unduly reduce the undertaking's net financial charges; 12 OJNoL148, 6 June 1997,pl 17 the undertaking or its legal successors shall not claim or be granted tax reduction or relief on the basis of past losses covered by the aid; there is a genuine and irreversible reduction in the shipbuilding, conversion or repair capacity of the undertaking concerned commensurate with the level of aid involved( in that regard the level of actual production in the preceding 5 years will be the determining factor in the level of capacity reduction required); the closed capacity must have been regularly used for shipbuilding, conversion or repair up to the date of notification of the particular aid in accordance with Article 10; the closed capacity must remain closed for not less than 10 years as from the Commission's approval of the aid; the Member State concerned must agree to co-operate fully with monitoring arrangements established by the Commission, including on-site inspections. 2. In assessing the regularity of production and the capacity reduction involved, the Commission will base its decision not only on the theoretical capacity of the yard(s) of the undertaking but also on the level of actual production over the preceding 5 years. No account will be taken of capacity reductions in other undertakings in the same Member State unless capacity reductions in the beneficiary undertaking are impossible without undermining the viability of the restructuring plan. 3. The Commission shall seek the views of Member States on all such cases where the aid is in excess of 10 mecus before adopting a position on them. CHAPTER IV OTHER MEASURES Article 6 Investment Aid for Innovation Aid granted for innovation in existing shipbuilding, shipconversion and shiprepair yards may be deemed compatible with the common market up to a maximum aid intensity of 10% gross provided that it relates to the development and industrial application of innovative products and processes that are genuinely and substantially new, ie are not currently used commercially by other operators in the sector within the European Union, and which carry a risk of technological or industrial failure, subject to the following conditions: it is limited to supporting expenditure on investments and engineering activities directly and exclusively related to the innovative part of the project; the amount and intensity of the aid is limited to the minimum necessary taking account of the degree of risk associated with the project. 18 Article 7 Regional Investment Aid Afd granted under general regional aid schemes for investment in upgrading or modernising existing yards, not linked to a financial restructuring of the yard(s) concerned, with the objective of improving the productivity of existing installations may be deemed compatible with the common market provided that: - it is limited to supporting eligible expenditure as defined by the applicable regional aid scheme; -the amount and intensity is within the applicable regional aid ceiling; Article $ Research and development Aid granted to defray expenditure by shipbuilding, conversion or repair undertakings on research and development projects may be considered compatible with the common market if it is in compliance with the rules laid in the Community framework for State aid for research and development, as currently set out in Official Journal of the European Communities No C 45 of 17 February 1996, or any successor arrangements. Article 9 Environmental protection Aid granted to defray expenditure by shipbuilding, conversion or repair undertakings for environmental protection may be considered compatible with the common market if it is in compliance with the rules laid down in the Community guidelines on state aid for environmental protection, as currently set out in Official journal of the European communities No C 72 of 10 March 1994, or any successor arrangements. CHAPTER V MONITORING PROCEDURES Article 10 1. 2. Aid to shipbuilding, conversion and repair undertakings covered by this Regulation shall be subject to, in addition to the provisions of Article 93 of the Treaty, the special notification rules provided for in paragraph 2. The following shall be notified to the Commission in advance by the Member States and authorised by the Commission before they are put into effect: 19 (a). (b) (c) any aid scheme - new or existing - or any amendment of an existing scheme covered by this Regulation; any decision to apply a generally applicable aid scheme, including generally applicable regional aid schemes, to the undertakings covered by this Regulation in order to verify compatibility with Article 92 of the Treaty, in particular in cases referred to in Articles 6, 7, 8 and 9 unless the aid is below the de minimis threshold of 100000 ecus over any three year period13; any individual application of aid schemes in the following cases: (i) those referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 3. 3 and in Article 3. 5, Article 4, and Article 5; or (ii)when specifically provided for by the Commission in its approval of the aid scheme concerned. Article XI 1. To enable the Commission to monitor application of the aid rules contained in Chapters II to IV, Member States shall supply it with: (a) monthly reports on each shipbuilding and conversion contract by the end of the third month following the month of signing of each contract, in accordance with the annexed Schedule 1; (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) 2. completion reports on each shipbuilding and conversion contract including those signed before the entry into force of this Regulation, by the end of the month following the month of completion, in accordance with the annexed Schedule 1 ; yearly reports, to be provided by 1 March of the year following the year subject to the report, giving details of the total amount of aid granted to each individual national shipyard during the previous calendar year, in accordance with the annexed Schedule 2; in the case of shipyards able to build merchant ships over 5 000 gt, yearly reports to be provided not later than two months after the annual general meeting has approved the shipyard's yearly report, giving publicly available information on capacity developments and on the structure of ownership, in accordance with the annexed Schedule 3; in the case of shipyards which have received restructuring aid in accordance with Article 5, quarterly reports on the attainment of the restructuring objectives, including the following elements: disbursement and use of the aid, investments, productivity performance, employment reductions, viability; in the case of shipyards benefitting from contracts supported by aid in the form of development assistance, such information as the Commission may require to enable it to ensure that the conditions of Article 3. 5 are respected. In the case of shipyards engaged in both commercial and military shipbuilding, conversion or repair, the reports referred to at (d) of paragraph 1 of this Article shall include information on these activities separately, including separate accounts with overheads apportioned accordingly. 13 Commission Notice, OJ No C68,6 March 1996 20 On the basis of the information communicated to it in accordance with Article'10 and paragraph 1 of this Article, the Commission shall draw up an annual overall report to serve as a basis for discussion with national experts and the Council. The report shall also be sent to the European Parliament for information. Separate half-yearly reports will be drawn up on cases involving restructuring aids. Article 11 This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 1999 and shall apply until 31 December 2003. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. 21 Schedule 1 REPORT OF MERCHANT SHIP ORDERS/COMPLETIONS (DELETE AS APPROPRIATE) Section 1: Contract details 1. New building / Conversion Section 3: Financial arrangements 14. Contract price Currency ECU (Prevailing rate) % of contract price 2. Company 3. Yard 4. Yard No 15. Estimated contract loss (if any) 5. Registered owner (name and nationality) 6. Holding owner (name and nationality) 7. Vessel's country of registration 8. Date contract signed 9. Completion / delivery date Section 2: Ship details 10. Type of vessel (by OECD category) 11. Dead-weight (DWT). 12. Gross tonnage (GT) 13. Compensated gross tonnage (CGT) 16. Contract related aid A. Granted to yard: (a) grants (b) credit facilities O specific fiscal concession (d) other support B. Granted to customer or ultimate owner : (â) grants (b) credit facilities14 O guarantees11 (d) fiscal concession (e) other support 17. Date aid granted Contact for inquiries: Date: for credits granted the following information shall be provided: - volume - repayment period - frequency of payments - interest rate for guarantees granted the following information shall be provided: - volume - premium paid - duration - other terms and conditions 22 Schedule 2 REPORT OF COMPANY FINANCIAL SUPPORT Name of company 1. Contract value 2. Costs/loss Direct aid received Indirect aid support Legal basis Oncluding date of approval by Commission) > Costs1* Aid received Legal basis (Including date of approval by the Commission) Section 1: Public aid Operating aid 1. Contract support: (a) related to contracts concluded before s 1 January of the year concerned (b) related to contracts concluded after 1 January of the year concerned, of which. • related to development assistance to developing countries • related to contracts subject to Article3 (3) 2. Investments 3. Social aids 4. Other cash closure costs 3. Asset disposal costs/receipts 6. Rescue and restructuring costs 7. Research and development costs 8. Environmental protection 9. Other costs Contact for inquiries: Date: Position: Signature:. 14 includino for 3, details of numbers of workers involved Section 2: Turnover and profit / (loss) to be completed by all companies in receipt of direct production aid Reporting year Previous year 10. Turnover 11. Of which related to merchant shipbuilding and ship conversion: (a) related to contracts concluded before 1 January of the year concerned (b) related to contracts concluded after 1 January of the year concerned, of which - related to development assistance to developing countries 12. Losses (if any) 13. Of which related to merchant shipbuilding and ship conversion: (a) related to loss on contracts (b) related to movement in provisions O related to restructuring expenditures Section 3: Cash flow to be filled in for all companies which have. registered losses under 12 and have received funding from any public sources) • Reporting year Previous year Expenditures 14. Trading losses before depreciation 15. Investment expenditure 16. Other expenditures 17. Other changes in working capital Source of funds 18. Equity receipts: (a) from public shareholders (b) from private shareholders 19. Loans and overdrafts: (a) from public sources (a') of which contract support (b) from private sources (b') of which contract support ' 23 Schedule 3 REPORT ON YARDS ABLE TO BUILD MERCHANT SHIPS OF OVER 5 000 GT 1. Name of the company 2. Total available capacity 3. Data on the dockfàerth (. ( ) ) (CGT) Dock or berth ( ( ( • • • ) •••) ) Maximum size of ships (GT) ( • ( ( ;••• • • : ) ) ) 4. Description of any plans for future capacity expansion or reduction 5. Structure of ownership (capital structure, share of direct and indirect public ownership) 6. Financial statements (balance sheet, profit and loss statement, including, if available separate accounts covering the shipbuilding activities of holding) 7. Transfer of public resources (including debt guarantees, bond infusions, etc. ) 8. Exemptions from financial or other obligations (including tax privileges, etc. ) 9. Capital contribution (including equity infusions, withdrawal of capital, dividend, loans and their refunding, etc. ) 10. Debt write-off 11. Transfer of losses 24 ISSN 0254-1475 COM(97) 469 final DOCUMENTS EN 07 15 08 10 Catalogue number : CB-CO-97-507-EN-C ISBN 92-78-25572-6 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg


title: Det Økonomiske og Sociale Udvalgs udtalelse om »Kommissionens meddelelse om miljøafgifter i det indre marked«

eurovoc_concepts:
EU environmental policy
EU law
economic instrument for the environment
environmental tax
single market

formats: html pdfa1b print


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2992/97 by Paul LANNOYE to the Commission. Ozone concentrations in the lower atmosphere

eurovoc_concepts:
atmosphere
blue-collar worker
occupational health
occupational safety
ozone
pollution control
professional sport
public health
quality of the environment
stratospheric pollution

formats: html print


title: SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE Nr. 2998/97 von Glyn FORD an die Kommission. Die Türkei und die Meinungsfreiheit

eurovoc_concepts:
European Commission
Türkiye
democratisation
human rights
non-governmental organisation

text: C 117/124 DE Amtsblatt der Europa¤ischen Gemeinschaften 16. 4. 98 Antwort von Herrn Kinnock im Namen der Kommission (4. November 1997) Bei der Verabschiedung der Leitlinien der Gemeinschaft fu¤r die Errichtung der transeuropa¤ischen Netze erkla¤rte sich die Kommission einverstanden, 1997 einen Bericht und gegebenenfalls einen Vorschlag fu¤r Hafenprojekte mit a¤hnlichem Lo¤sungsansatz wie derjenige von Flugha¤fen vorzulegen. Die Kommission arbeitet diesen Bericht zur Zeit aus und hofft, ihn dem Parlament und dem Rat vor Ende 1997 vorlegen zu ko¤nnen. (98/C 117/158) SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE E-2989/97 von Nikitas Kaklamanis (UPE) an die Kommission (1. Oktober 1997) Betrifft: Willku¤rliches Vorgehen der Tu¤rkei in den Meerengen Nach Erkla¤rungen offizieller Vertreter der Tu¤rkei hat die Tu¤rkei damit begonnen, einseitige Ma(cid:223)nahmen zur U¤ berwachung der Schiffahrt in den Meerengen des Bosporus und der Dardanellen einzufu¤hren, was bereits Reaktionen selbst in maritimen Kreisen der Tu¤rkei hervorgerufen hat, die sich fu¤r eine internationale Lo¤sung dieses Problems einsetzen. Im u¤brigen hat auch die IMO ihr Mi(cid:223)fallen u¤ber das Vorgehen der tu¤rkischen Regierung zum Ausdruck gebracht, das mit mathematischer Vorhersagbarkeit zu einer gro¤(cid:223)eren Krise in der Region fu¤hren mu(cid:223). Ein weiteres Beispiel fu¤r die destabilisierende Handlungsweise der tu¤rkischen Beho¤rden ist die neuerliche Durchsuchung der den Bosporus durchquerenden Schiffe, bei der Komponenten des russischen Luftabwehrsy- stems S-300 ausfindig gemacht werden sollen, welches die Republik Zypern eingekauft hat und in dem Bestreben, sich gegen den unersa¤ttlichen tu¤rkischen Expansionsdrang zu schu¤tzen, auf der Insel aufzustellen beabsichtigt. Kann die Europa¤ische Kommission ihre Haltung zu den willku¤rlichen Schritten der tu¤rkischen Seite, die das Statut fu¤r die Meerengen zu a¤ndern beabsichtigt, erla¤utern und mitteilen, auf welche Weise sie reagieren will, falls die Tu¤rkei ein derartig illegales Vorhaben in die Tat umsetzen sollte? Antwort von Herrn Van den Broek im Namen der Kommission (24. Oktober 1997) Den Ermittlungen der Komission zufolge plant die tu¤rkische Regierung keine Ma(cid:223)nahmen zur A¤ nderung der Schiffahrtsu¤berwachung in den Meerengen des Bosporus und der Dardanellen. (98/C 117/159) SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE E-2998/97 von Glyn Ford (PSE) an die Kommission (1. Oktober 1997) Betrifft: Die Tu¤rkei und die Meinungsfreiheit Ist der Kommission angesichts ihrer neuesten Mitteilung (KOM(97)394), in der eine mo¤glichst breit angelegte Zusammenarbeit mit europa¤ischen, und noch wichtiger, tu¤rkischen NRO gefordert wird, die fu¤r eine bessere Menschenrechtslage usw. ka¤mpfen, ein Dokument des tu¤rkischen Innenministeriums (Nr. BO5HIDOOOOO73/ 472) vom Januar 1997 mit einem Programm zur Behinderung der Ta¤tigkeiten von NRO bekannt, die u¤ber Menschenrechte berichten? Inwieweit kann die Kommission zusichern, da(cid:223) die tu¤rkische Regierung nicht la¤nger diese Politik betreibt?


title: INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA n. 2991/97 dell'on. María SORNOSA MARTÍNEZ alla Commissione. Proibizione della pratica della caccia e protezione giuridica del Marjal del Moro (Valencia)

eurovoc_concepts:
Community of Valencia
bird
hunting
hunting regulations
protected area
protected species
protection of animal life
wildlife


title: ΓΡΑΠΤΗ ΕΡΩΤΗΣΗ αρ θ. 3017/97 του Amedeo AMADEO προς την Επ τροπή. Δασοπονία

eurovoc_concepts:
afforestation
environmental protection
forest conservation
forestry economics
forestry policy
silviculture
wood industry

text: 30. 4. 98 EL Epi·shmh Efhmeri·da tvn Eyrvpai¤kv· n Koinoth·tvn C 134/59 (98/C 134/72) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-3015/97 ypobolh· : Amedeo Amadeo (NI) prow thn Epitroph· (1h Oktvbri·oy 1997) Ue·ma: Endeiktiko· pyrhniko· pro·gramma gia thn Eyrvpai¤kh· (cid:201)nvsh › PINC Sxetika· me thn «Anakoi·nvsh thw Epitroph·w» Oi pyrhnike·w biomhxani·ew thw Eyrvpai¤kh·w (cid:201)nvshw › Endeiktiko· pyrhniko· pro·gramma sy·mfvna me to a·ruro 40 thw Synuh·khw Euratom (PINC) (e·ggr. COM(96) 0339) (e·ggr. CES 470/97). H pyrhnikh· ene·rgeia apo· thn opoi·a sh·mera proe·rxetai to e·na tri·to thw hlektrikh·w ene·rgeiaw thw EE, paroysia·zei orisme·na shmantika· periballontika· pleonekth·mata e·nanti tvn oryktv· n kaysi·mvn gia thn paragvgh· thw hlektrikh·w ene·rgeiaw, l. x. thn apoysi·a ekpompv· n diojeidi·oy toy a·nurakow. H pyrhnikh· ene·rgeia o·mvw apaitei· th dhmioyrgi·a eno·w eyre·ow systh·matow to opoi·o na ejasfali·zei thn asfalh· thw leitoyrgi·a. H dia·xyth sthn koinh· gnv· mh anhsyxi·a, h eleyue·rvsh kai to a· noigma ston antagvnismo· agorv· n oi opoi·ew sta perisso·tera kra·th me·lh h·san prostateyo·menew (pra·gma poy shmai·nei makropro·uesmew ependy·seiw kai mega·lh e·ntash kefalai·oy), te·low h dia·uesh fysikoy· aeri·oy se antagvnistike·w time·w to opoi·o xrhsimopoiei·tai se mikro·terew mona·dew paragvgh·w, apotelesmatiko·terew kai me xamhlo·tero ko·stow leitoyrgi·aw, apoteloy·n apofasistikoy·w para·gontew oi opoi·oi kauistoy·n ela·xista piuano·, ba·sei tvn shmerinv· n plhroforiv· n, mi·a syne·xish thw paragvgh·w pyrhnikh·w ene·rgeiaw meta· to 2005-2010, peri·odo kata· thn opoi·a sta perisso·tera kra·th me·lh, oi yfista·menoi staumoi· pyrhnikh·w ene·rgeiaw oloklh·rvnan thn peri·odo leitoyrgi·aw toyw. H prooptikh· miaw te·toiaw eje·lijhw pre·pei na egei·rei sobara· strathgika· ue·mata sxetika· me thn energeiakh· politikh· thw EE. To gegono·w o·ti to e·ggrafo den ypogrammi·zei th spoydaio·thta tvn proanaferue·ntvn strathgikv· n uema·tvn kai den ajiologei· kata·llhla tiw piuane·w toyw epiptv· seiw epi· thw energeiakh·w politikh·w thw EE, apotelei· sobaro·tath para·leich. Zhtei·tai apo thn Epitroph· na antimetvpi·sei ta ue·mata ayta· se epi·pedo telikh·w diaty·pvshw toy endeiktikoy· pyrhnikoy· progra·mmatow, kai na katalh·jei se safh· sympera·smata, pare·xontaw prosanatolismoy·w sta endiafero·mena me·rh kai thn koinh· gnv· mh o·son afora· tiw mellontike·w pragmatiko·thtew. Apa· nthsh toy k. Papoytsh· ej ono·matow thw Epitroph· w (18 Noembri·oy 1997) H Epitroph· ene·krine, stiw 25 Septembri·oy 1997, thn oristikh· e·kdosh toy endeiktikoy· pyrhnikoy· progra·mmatow (PINC) (1). H Epitroph· diapistv· nei o·ti to fysiko· ae·rio paroysia·zetai sh·mera elkystiko· gia thn hlektroparagvgh· kai, kata· syne·peia, ekto·w apo· tiw dy·o pyrhnike·w mona·dew poy kataskeya·zontai sth Galli·a, den yfi·statai a·llh gnvsth· apo·fash kataskeyh·w pyrhnikv· n mona·dvn sthn Koino·thta. H Epitroph· uev· rhse o·ti sto tre·xon endeiktiko· pyrhniko· pro·gramma den h·tan sko·pimo na protei·nei makropro·uesma ependytika· progra·mmata, lo·gv thw epikratoy·saw abebaio·thtaw sxetika· me to me·llon thw pyrhnikh·w ene·rgeiaw se orisme·na kra·th me·lh. Vsto·so, se peri·ptvsh poy ekdhlvuei· sthn Koino·thta ne·a politikh· boy·lhsh ype·r thw hlektroparagvgh·w apo· pyrhnikh· ene·rgeia, ua h·tan i·svw anagkai·o na kauoristoy·n ek ne·oy ple·on makropro·uesmoi sto·xoi. (cid:201)xei shmasi·a na tonistei· o·ti pe·ran toy 2010 ei·nai endexo·meno na anaptyxuoy·n progra·mmata antikata·stashw tvn yfista·menvn pyrhnikv· n staumv· n hlektroparagvgh·w apo· o·sa kra· th me·lh uelh·soyn na antikatasth·soyn tiw prow klei·simo kai apojh·lvsh mona·dew toyw apo· ne·oyw antidrasth·rew prohgme·nhw h· ne·aw texnologi·aw. Entoy·toiw, te·toioy ei·doyw apofa·seiw den ei·nai epi· toy paro·ntow dynato·n na problefuoy·n. (1) COM(97)401 teliko·. (98/C 134/73) Ue·ma: Dasoponi·a GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-3017/97 ypobolh· : Amedeo Amadeo (NI) prow thn Epitroph· (1h Oktvbri·oy 1997) Sxetika· me «thn kata·stash kai ta problh·mata thw dasoponi·aw sthn Eyrvpai¤kh· (cid:201)nvsh kai tiw dynato·thtew ana·ptyjhw tvn dasikv· n politikv· n» (e·ggr. CES 476/97) (1)


title: Stellungnahme des Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschusses zu dem "Vorschlag für eine Richtlinie des Rates über Abfalldeponien"

eurovoc_concepts:
EU environmental policy
environmental protection
storage of waste
waste disposal
waste management


title: ΓΡΑΠΤΗ ΕΡΩΤΗΣΗ αρ θ. 2987/97 του Nikitas KAKLAMANIS προς την Επ τροπή. Οικολογική καταστροφή στη Μεσόγειο από μεταλλαγμένο φύκι

eurovoc_concepts:
Mediterranean Sea
algae
marine life
natural disaster
plant propagation
protection of animal life
protection of plant life

text: 16. 4. 98 EL Epi·shmh Efhmeri·da tvn Eyrvpai¤kv· n Koinoth·tvn C 117/123 H (cid:201)nvsh e·xei kathgorhmatika· katadika·sei thn «Fatwa» kata· toy Salman Rushdie. To ue·ma ayto·, kauv· w kai h di·kh toy Faradj Sarkouhi kai h epistrofh· tvn pre·sbevn tvn kratv· n melv· n sthn Texera·nh, syzhtoy·ntai tv· ra sto plai·sio thw koinh·w ejvterikh·w politikh·w kai thw politikh·w asfalei·aw. (98/C 117/156) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-2987/97 ypobolh· : Nikitas Kaklamanis (UPE) prow thn Epitroph· (1 Oktvbri·oy 1997) Ue·ma: Oikologikh· katastrofh· sth Meso·geio apo· metallagme·no fy·ki Ta teleytai·a xro·nia ejaplv· netai aneje·legkta sth Meso·geio e·na ei·dow metallagme·noy tropikoy· fykioy· thw, to «Kaoyle·rpa Tajifo·lia», to opoi·o e·xei metaferuei· sthn Eyrv· ph gia na diakosmei· to enydrei·o eno·w germanikoy· zvologikoy· kh·poy. To fy·ki ype·sth meta·llajh me apote·lesma na dhmioyrghuei· ne·o ei·dow, to opoi·o ejaplv· netai me mega·lh taxy·thta kai antiste·ketai se ka·ue prospa·ueia ejo·ntvsh·w toy. (cid:211)poy emfani·zetai den ypa·rxoyn ple·on kora·lia, sfoygga·ria, kaboy·ria kai opoiodh·pote a·llo ei·dow uala·ssiaw xlvri·daw kai pani·daw, env· ejafani·zontai, telika·, kai ta ca· ria. To ne·o ayto· ei·dow ejaplv· netai me mega·lh taxy·thta kai odhgei· se tera·stia oikologikh· katastrofh· thn eyai·suhth Leka·nh thw Mesogei·oy. Ua h·uela na plhroforhuv· to pv· w skopey·ei na antidra·sei h Eyrvpai¤kh· Epitroph· kai ti· prvtoboyli·ew pro·keitai na anala·bei prokeime·noy na antistrafei· h porei·a prow thn katastrofh· sthn opoi·a odhgei·tai me mauhmatikh· akri·beia h Meso·geiow. Apa· nthsh thw kaw Bjerregaard ej ono·matow thw Epitroph· w (30 Oktvbri·oy 1997) Sto dia·sthma apo· to 1992 e·vw to 1995 h Epitroph· sygxrhmatodo·thse, me·sv toy Life, e·na dieune·w e·rgo me skopo· th mele·th toy problh·matow thw epe·ktashw tvn fykv· n toy ei·doyw caulerpa taxifolia sthn Meso·geio, kai thn pro·gnvsh thw peraite·rv eje·lijhw toy fainome·noy. To e·rgo ektele·sthke apo· gallike·w, ispanike·w kai italike·w oma·dew. Me ba·sh ta apotele·smata toy anvte·rv e·rgoy, kai lo·gv thw akata·paysthw epe·ktashw tvn anvte·rvn fykv· n, h Epitroph· apefa·sise to 1995 na xorhgh·sei dey·terh xrhmatodo·thsh apo· to Life gia ene·rgeia me skopo· th dokimh· peiramatikv· n texnikv· n eja·leichw tvn fykv· n kai thn kata·strvsh strathgikh·w gia thn anakoph· thw epe·ktash·w toyw. To e·rgo syntoni·zetai apo· ton o·milo episthmonikoy· skopoy· (GIS) Posidonie thw Masali·aw, apo· ton opoi·o to Ajio·timo Me·low toy Koinoboyli·oy mporei· na anazhth·sei analytiko·terew plhrofori·ew. O GIS Posidonie diorga·nvse sygkekrime·na, stiw 19 kai 20 Septembri·oy 1997, hmeri·da me antikei·meno ton e·legxo thw epe·ktashw toy ei·doyw caulerpa taxifolia. Ta praktika· thw hmeri·daw ayth·w aname·netai na dhmosieyuoy·n prosexv· w. Pre·pei na shmeivuei· o·ti molono·ti h Epitroph·, me·sv toy xrhmatodotikoy· me·soy Life, symmete·xei sto xarakthrismo· toy ypo·ch problh·matow kai stiw peiramatike·w fa·seiw epi·lyshw, ta endexo·mena prow lh·ch diarurvtika· me·tra ypo·keintai sthn eyuy·nh tvn oikei·vn kratv· n melv· n. (98/C 117/157) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-2988/97 ypobolh· : Nikitas Kaklamanis (UPE) prow thn Epitroph· (1 Oktvbri·oy 1997) Ue·ma: (cid:201)kuesh thw Eyrvpai¤kh·w Epitroph·w gia ta eyrvpai¤ka· lima·nia Kata· th dia·rkeia tvn diaboyley·sevn toy Eyrvpai¤koy· Koinoboyli·oy me thn Eyrvpai¤kh· Epitroph· kai to Symboy·lio sxetika· me ta Dieyrvpai¤ka· Di·ktya Metaforv· n, yph·rje h rhth· de·smeysh thw Epitroph·w o·ti ua synta·jei kai ua provuh·sei stiw arxe·w toy 1997 sto Eyrvpai¤ko· Koinoboy·lio, e·kuesh sxetika· me me·tra dra·shw gia thn ana·ptyjh tvn eyrvpai¤kv· n limaniv· n. Ua h·uela na plhroforhuv· apo· thn Eyrvpai¤kh· Epitroph· an e·xei syntaxuei· to e·ggrafo ayto·, kauv· w kai to po·te ua douei· sto Eyrvpai¤ko· Koinoboy·lio


title: COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1916/97 of 1 October 1997 fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar for the ninth partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1408/97

eurovoc_concepts:
award of contract
export refund
white sugar


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3010/97 by Graham WATSON to the Commission. Substainable farming projects

eurovoc_concepts:
EU programme
Wales
aid to agriculture
environmental protection
means of agricultural production
sustainable development
use of outer space

text: 30. 4. 98 FI Euroopan yhteiso¤jen virallinen lehti C 134/57 (98/C 134/69) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-3009/97 komissiolle esitta¤ja¤(t): Mihail Papayannakis (GUE/NGL) (1. lokakuuta 1997) Aihe: Ekologinen tuho Kerkini-ja¤rvella¤ Kerkini-ja¤rvi on ta¤rkea¤ ja suojeltu, rikkaan kasvi- ja ela¤inkunnan omaava biotooppi Pohjois-Kreikassa. Suojellulla alueella on yksityinen poppeliviljelma¤, jonka omistaja (heina¤kuussa 1994) kaatoi puut huolimatta siita¤, etta¤ niissa¤ oli satoja harmaahaikaroiden pesia¤, joissa olleet vastasyntyneet poikaset eiva¤t viela¤ kyenneet lenta¤ma¤a¤n. Ta¤ma¤ teko aiheutti yli 200 linnun kuoleman ja ja¤rkytti yleista¤ mielipidetta¤ Kreikassa. Asiasta vastaavat toimivaltaiset viranomaiset eiva¤t esta¤neet ta¤ta¤ tekoa eiva¤tka¤ toteuttaneet viljelma¤n omistajaa vastaan suunnattuja toimenpiteita¤. Komissiolta kysyta¤a¤n, tieta¤a¤ko¤ se na¤ista¤ tapahtumista ja onko se siina¤ asemassa, etta¤ se voi pyyta¤a¤ selityksia¤ Kreikan hallitukselta, jotta varmistettaisiin biotooppien parempi suojelu ja rangaistukset rikkomuksiin syyllis- tyville? Komission ja¤senen Ritt Bjerregaardin komission puolesta antama vastaus (13. marraskuuta 1997) Kerkinija¤rvi on tekoja¤rvi, mutta silti hyvin runsaslajinen kosteikko, jonka Kreikan viranomaiset ovat nimenneet luonnonvaraisten lintujen suojelusta annetun direktiivin 79/409/ETY (1) mukaiseksi erityiseksi suojelualueeksi. Aluetta on ehdotettu suojeltavaksi myo¤s luontotyyppien seka¤ luonnonvaraisen ela¤imisto¤n ja kasviston suojelusta annetun direktiivin 92/43/ETY (2) nojalla. Ja¤rvi on yksi ta¤rkeimpia¤ paikkoja, missa¤ toteutetaan Life-Nature -hankkeeseen ((cid:148)Phalacrocorax pygmaeuksen ja Anser erythropuksen suojelu Kreikassa(cid:148)) liittyvia¤ toimia. Kesa¤kuun puoliva¤lissa¤ 1997 hankkeen edunsaajat saivatkin tieta¤a¤ harmaahaikaran pesia¤ ka¤sitta¤va¤n poppeliviljelma¤n kaatamisesta ja ilmoittivat siita¤ va¤litto¤ma¤sti Kreikan viranomaisille. Poppeliviljelma¤ sijaitsi kuitenkin yksityisalueella suojelualueen ulkopuolella eika¤ siihen siis voida soveltaa erityisia¤ suojelualueita koskevaa suojeluja¤rjestelma¤a¤. Komission tietojen mukaan Kreikan maatalousministerio¤ laati asiasta kuitenkin kiertokirjeen, jossa poppelien kaataminen kielleta¤a¤n haikaroiden pesima¤kaudella (helmikuun puoliva¤lista¤ heina¤kuun loppuun). Kieltoa laajennetaan koskemaan koko asianoma- ista Kerkinija¤rven osaa. Komissiolle on ilmoitettu muistakin Kerkinija¤rven suojelua koskevista ongelmista, ja se tutkii asiaa saadakseen tilanteesta selkea¤n ka¤sityksen ja voidakseen toteuttaa tarvittaessa asianmukaisia toimenpiteita¤. (1) EYVL L 103, 25. 4. 1979, sellaisena kuin se on muutettuna Ita¤vallan, Suomen ja Ruotsin liittymisasiakirjalla (EYVL L 1, 1. 1. 1995). (2) EYVL L 206, 22. 7. 1992. (98/C 134/70) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-3010/97 komissiolle esitta¤ja¤(t): Graham Watson (ELDR) (1. lokakuuta 1997) Aihe: Ekologisesti kesta¤va¤t maataloushankkeet Onko komissio tietoinen Walesissa laaditusta (cid:148)Tir Cymen(cid:148) -suunnitelmasta, joka tukee ekologisesti kesta¤va¤a¤ maataloutta? Aikooko komissio tukea ta¤llaisia suunnitelmia? Komission ja¤senen Franz Fischlerin komission puolesta antama vastaus (7. marraskuuta 1997) Komissio on hyva¤ksynyt Tir Cymen -ohjelman ja yhteisrahoittaa sita¤ ympa¤risto¤nsuojelun vaatimusten ja maaseutuympa¤risto¤n hoidon vaatimusten kanssa sopusointuisista maatalouden tuotantomenetelmista¤ annetun asetuksen (ETY) 2078/92 (1) nojalla


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3019/97 by Amedeo AMADEO to the Commission. Improving the production and marketing of honey

text: C 117/128 FI Euroopan yhteiso¤jen virallinen lehti 16. 4. 98 Komission ja¤senen Hans Van den Broekin komission puolesta antama vastaus (20. lokakuuta 1997) Komissio on selvilla¤ ydinvoimaonnettomuuksiin liittyvista¤ vaaroista Keski- ja Ita¤-Euroopan maissa (KIE-maat) seka¤ uusissa itsena¤isissa¤ valtioissa. Pharen ja Tacisin ydinturvallisuusohjelmia varten onkin myo¤nnetty noin 700 miljoonaa ecua vuosina 1990 › 1997. Riippumattomien va¤liaikaisten asiantuntijoiden laatima Phare- ja Tacis-ohjelmien va¤livaiheen arviointi valmis- tui hiljattain ja se toimitettiin Euroopan parlamentille vuoden 1997 kesa¤kuussa. Arvioinnista ka¤y ilmi, etta¤ toimeenpanoon liittyvista¤ kiistattomista vaikeuksista huolimatta suurin osa ydinturvallisuutta koskevista hankkeista on tuloksellisia. Komissio selvitta¤a¤ parhaillaan, miten ydinturvallisuusalaa koskevia politiikan suuntaviivoja ja ta¤yta¤nto¤o¤npano- ja¤rjestelmia¤ olisi mahdollista muuttaa ohjelmien tehostamiseksi. Alustavia keskusteluja on myo¤s ka¤yty ja¤senmaiden kanssa, Phare- ja Tacis-komiteoissa seka¤ Euroopan parlamentin toimivaltaisten valiokuntien kanssa (ympa¤risto¤-, terveys- ja kuluttajansuojavaliokunta; tutkimusta, teknologista kehitta¤mista¤ ja energia-asioita ka¤sitteleva¤ valiokunta; talousarvion valvontavaliokunta). Komissio saattaa asiaa koskevan kantansa lopulliseen muotoonsa esitettyjen na¤kemysten perusteella. Na¤ma¤ tulokset otetaan huomioon uudella ohjelmointikaudella 1998, joka ka¤ynnistyy piakkoin. (98/C 117/166) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-3019/97 komissiolle esitta¤ja¤(t): Amedeo Amadeo (NI) (1. lokakuuta 1997) Aihe: Hunajan tuotannon ja kaupan pita¤misen edista¤minen Viite: Ehdotus neuvoston asetukseksi (EY) hunajan tuotannon ja kaupan pita¤misen kehitta¤miseksi yhteiso¤ssa¤ tarkoitettujen toimien soveltamista koskevista yleisista¤ sa¤a¤nno¤ista¤ (KOM(96)0596 lopull. › 96/0282 CNS) (1). Voiko komissio huolehtia siita¤, etta¤ nuorille viljelijo¤ille tarkoitetut ammatillisen koulutuksen ohjelmat sisa¤llyteta¤a¤n ehdotuksessa ensisijaisten tavoitteiden joukkoon? (1) EYVL C 378, 13. 12. 1996, s. 20. (98/C 117/167) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-3020/97 komissiolle esitta¤ja¤(t): Amedeo Amadeo (NI) (1. lokakuuta 1997) Aihe: Hunajan tuotannon ja kaupan pita¤misen edista¤minen Viite: Ehdotus neuvoston asetukseksi (EY) hunajan tuotannon ja kaupan pita¤misen kehitta¤miseksi yhteiso¤ssa¤ tarkoitettujen toimien soveltamista koskevista yleisista¤ (KOM(96)0596 lopull. › 96/0282 CNS (1). Voiko komissio toteuttaa ampiaisiin tarttuvien tautien torjumiseksi toimia, joissa ei rajoituta yksinoma- an varroa-punkin torjuntaan? sa¤a¤nno¤ista¤ (1) EYVL C 378, 13. 12. 1996, s. 20. (98/C 117/168) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-3021/97 komissiolle esitta¤ja¤(t): Amedeo Amadeo (NI) (1. lokakuuta 1997) Aihe: Hunajan tuotannon ja kaupan pita¤misen edista¤minen Viite: Ehdotus neuvoston asetukseksi (EY) hunajan tuotannon ja kaupan pita¤misen kehitta¤miseksi yhteiso¤ssa¤ tarkoitettujen toimien soveltamista koskevista yleisista¤ sa¤a¤nno¤ista¤ (KOM(96)0596 lopull. › 96/0282 CNS) (1)


title: INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA n. 3016/97 dell'on. Amedeo AMADEO alla Commissione. Programma indicativo nucleare per l'Unione europea - PINC

eurovoc_concepts:
Central and Eastern Europe
Commonwealth of Independent States
EU Member State
EU programme
European Commission
European Parliament
nuclear industry
nuclear policy
nuclear safety
project evaluation

text: 16. 4. 98 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunita‘ europee C 117/127 Risposta comune data dal sig. ra Wulf-Mathies a nome della Commissione alle interrogazioni scritte E-3013/97 e E-3033/97 (24 ottobre 1997) Con decisione dell’8 maggio 1996 la Commissione ha deciso di attribuire la riserva finanziaria delle iniziative comunitarie. L’importo indicativo assegnato all’iniziativa URBAN in Italia ammonta, per il periodo 1997-1999, a 11,81 milioni di ecu per l’obiettivo 1 e a 6,40 milioni di ecu per gli altri obiettivi (prezzi indicizzati 1995). Nella comunicazione agli Stati membri (1) (vedasi in particolare il punto 20) la Commissione ha invitato gli Stati membri a presentare programmi operativi nell’ambito dell’iniziativa URBAN. Oltre alla ripartizione tra zone dell’obiettivo 1 e zone non comprese nell’obiettivo 1, la Commissione non ha previsto alcuna suddivisione geografica all’interno dei singoli Stati membri. Le autorita‘ italiane hanno presentato una proposta relativa a programmi per le citta‘ di Trieste, Lecce e Catanzaro. (1) GU C 200 del 10. 7. 1996. (98/C 117/164) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-3014/97 di Amedeo Amadeo (NI) alla Commissione (1o ottobre 1997) Oggetto: Progetti FESR Il 30 novembre 1995 la Commissione ha pubblicato il bando di concorso per la presentazione di progetti pilota urbani, nel quadro delle misure innovative di cui all(cid:146)articolo 10 del FESR. Puo‘ la Commissione far sapere quanti progetti sono stati presentati dall(cid:146)Italia? Risposta data dalla sig. ra Wulf-Mathies a nome della Commissione (23 ottobre 1997) In seguito all’invito a presentare proposte (1) ai sensi dell’articolo 10 del regolamento del Fondo europeo di sviluppo regionale (2) sono pervenuti alla Commissione 503 progetti, di cui 119 presentati dall’Italia. Visto il grande interesse manifestato, per la selezione finale e‘ stata adottata una procedura di valutazione rigorosa e, in base ai criteri stabiliti, la Commissione ha selezionato un totale di 26 progetti, di cui 4 riguardano l’Italia e piu‘ precisamente le citta‘ di Brindisi, Milano, Napoli e Torino. (1) GU C 319 del 30. 11. 1995. (2) GU L 193 del 31. 7. 1993. (98/C 117/165) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-3016/97 di Amedeo Amadeo (NI) alla Commissione (1o ottobre 1997) Oggetto: Programma indicativo nucleare per l(cid:146)Unione europea › PINC La Commissione ha elaborato la Comunicazione «Le industrie nucleari dell(cid:146)Unione europea › Programma indicativo nucleare ai sensi dell(cid:146)articolo 40 del Trattato Euratom (PINC)» (doc. COM(96)339 final) (doc. CES 470/97). A proposito dei potenziali pericoli legati agli impianti nucleari dei PECO e della CSI, non vi dovrebbero essere dubbi sugli effetti profondamente dannosi che produrrebbe sull(cid:146)opinione pubblica un altro eventuale incidente nucleare su larga scala. I programmi PHARE e TACIS si sono dimostrati preziosi, ma sono ora sempre piu‘ oggetto di critiche. Nella misura in cui tali programmi trattano di sicurezza nucleare, intende la Commissione riesaminarli con urgenza e pubblicare poi l(cid:146)esito di tale riesame?


title: SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL nr. 3006/97 af Roberta ANGELILLI til Kommissionen. Farligt affald på et forladt lager tilhørende den kemiske virksomhed Zucchet i Rom

eurovoc_concepts:
Latium
cessation of trading
chemical industry
dangerous substance
environmental protection
industrial waste
public health
waste disposal
waste management
waste recycling

text: 30. 4. 98 DA De Europ(cid:230)iske F(cid:230)llesskabers Tidende C 134/55 (98/C 134/67) SKRIFTLIG FORESP(cid:216)RGSEL E-3006/97 af Roberta Angelilli (NI) til Kommissionen (1. oktober 1997) Om: Farligt affald p(cid:229) et forladt lager tilhłrende den kemiske virksomhed Zucchet i Rom Den 9. december 1996 vedtog Roms kommune en beslutning om at fjerne alt affald fra den kemiske virksomhed Zucchets forladte lagerhal og laboratorium, der ligger i Via Pian Due Torri i bydelen Magliana i Rom. P(cid:229) dette sted, der ligger op ad Tiberen, et sportsanl(cid:230)g og nogle boliger, var der blevet fundet flere hundrede metaltłnder, beholdere og s(cid:230)kke indeholdende ikke n(cid:230)rmere identificerede stoffer. Trods den ovenn(cid:230)vnte beslutning har ingen słrget for, at den blev gennemfłrt, og alt affaldet befinder sig stadig p(cid:229) det tidligere lager, uanset de foruroligende rapporter fra det lokale renholdningsselskab Rm D, der p(cid:229)peger, at det er nłdvendigt at identificere de p(cid:229)g(cid:230)ldende affaldsstoffer. P(cid:229) denne baggrund anmodes Kommissionen om at oplyse fłlgende: 1. Indeb(cid:230)rer sagen ikke en kr(cid:230)nkelse af direktiv 96/61/EF (1) om integreret forebyggelse og bek(cid:230)mpelse af forurening og navnlig af artikel 3, litra f), hvor det fasts(cid:230)ttes, at medlemsstaterne tr(cid:230)ffer de nłdvendige foranstaltninger for, at alle anl(cid:230)g drives p(cid:229) en s(cid:229)dan m(cid:229)de, at der ved endeligt ophłr af aktiviteterne tr(cid:230)ffes de nłdvendige foranstaltninger for at undg(cid:229) forureningsfare og for at bringe stedet tilbage i en tilfredsstillende stand? 2. Indeb(cid:230)rer sagen ikke en kr(cid:230)nkelse af direktiv 91/689/E(cid:216)F (2) om farligt affald? 3. Agter Kommissionen, s(cid:229)fremt det fastsl(cid:229)s, at EU(cid:146)s miljłbestemmelser er overtr(cid:229)dt, at rette henvendelse til de italienske myndigheder for at sikre, at lovgivningen overholdes? (1) EFT L 257 af 10. 10. 1996, s. 26. (2) EFT L 377 af 31. 12. 1991, s. 20. Svar afgivet p(cid:229) Kommissionens vegne af Ritt Bjerregaard (11. november 1997) Det (cid:230)rede medlem fremfłrer, at uanset den s(cid:230)rlige forordning af 9. december 1996, ligger det affald, der er produceret af den kemiske virksomhed Zucchet, stadig oplagret i blikdunke og plastics(cid:230)kke, som rummer ikke n(cid:230)rmere identificerede stoffer. I henhold til R(cid:229)dets direktiv 75/442/E(cid:216)F om affald, som (cid:230)ndret ved R(cid:229)dets direktiv 91/156/E(cid:216)F (1), er det forbudt at efterlade, dumpe eller p(cid:229) ukontrolleret vis at bortskaffe affald. Desuden skal medlemsstaterne i henhold til dette direktiv sikre, at affaldet genindvindes eller bortskaffes uden risiko for menneskers sundhed og uden brug af processer eller metoder, som i givet fald kunne v(cid:230)re til skade for miljłet. I henhold til R(cid:229)dets direktiv 91/689/E(cid:216)F om farligt affald (2) skal medlemsstaterne sikre sig, at der p(cid:229) enhver lokalitet, hvor der deponeres farligt affald, omhyggeligt fłres bog over dette med n(cid:230)rmere identifikation heraf. Desuden er det i henhold til dette direktiv forbudt generelt at blande farligt affald med andet farligt affald eller med andet affald, stoffer eller materialer. Under indsamling, transport og midlertidig opbevaring skal affaldet v(cid:230)re tilstr(cid:230)kkeligt emballeret og m(cid:230)rket i overensstemmelse med s(cid:229)vel de internationale som F(cid:230)llesskabets nug(cid:230)ldende standarder p(cid:229) dette omr(cid:229)de. De italienske myndigheder har pligt til at sikre, at de ovenn(cid:230)vnte krav bliver behłrigt efterkommet, og Kommissionen vil tilsende dem et officielt brev herom. (1) EFT L 78 af 26. 3. 1991, s. 1. (2) EFT L 377 af 31. 12. 1991, s. 1