Improved cropland management, which includes agricultural adaptation strategies such as integrated soil management, no/reduced tillage, conservation agriculture, planting of stress-resistant or early maturing crop varieties, and mulching, has high economic and environmental feasibility  . Despite higher initial costs in some cases, the economic feasibility of improved cropland management is high through improved productivity, higher net returns and reduced input costs . Self-efficacy is shown to be the most important predictor in technical and non-technical adaptation behaviour , while subsidies, extension services, training, commercial custom-hire services and strong social connections such as farmer networks are among the factors supporting adoption among farmers  . In some regions and for some practices, technological feasibility is constrained by costs and inadequate information and technical know-how on particular practices and their benefits and trade-offs, indicating medium feasibility . Delays between actions and tangible benefits can reduce public and private acceptability and uptake of improved cropland management practices .
IPCC
Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
IPCC Report