Results such as those in Figure 18.5 illustrate that mitigation- development trade-offs are inevitable and need to be considered and addressed. For instance, Roy  found that although limiting warming to 1.5℃ would make it markedly easier to achieve most of the UN's SDGs, none of the 1.5℃ pathways assessed achieved all of the SDGs. A similar conclusion follows from the results in Figure 18.5 based on WGIII AR6 scenarios .. A newer literature is developing, evaluating the potential for managing SDG trade-offs. Results like those in Figure 18.5 provide insights regarding some of the types of strategy sets to consider. Roy et al.  discuss the potential for policies that address distributional implications, such as payments, food support and revenue recycling, as well as education, retraining and technology outreach, subsidies or prioritisation. Recent studies have begun to estimate potential payments to offset trade-offs, such as related to food, water and energy access . These analyses estimate investments to address specific trade-offs; however, with mitigation redirecting resources away from other productive activities, there is a need to also evaluate the aggregate economy-wide, distributional and welfare effects, including the redistribution effects of managing sustainable development trade-offs.
IPCC
Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
IPCC Report