The Paris Climate Agreement marked a significant shift for the IPCC AR6 assessment towards a systematic exploration of climate solutions and a suite of linked adaptation and mitigation options . This shift was first evidenced in SR1.5, whose plenary- approved outline sought to define feasibility as 'referring to the potential for a mitigation or adaptation option to be implemented. Factors influencing feasibility are context-dependent, temporally dynamic, and may vary between different groups and actors. Feasibility depends on geophysical, environmental-ecological, technological, economic, socio-cultural and institutional factors that enable or constrain the implementation of an option. The feasibility of options may change when different options are combined and increase when enabling conditions are strengthened'. Based on this, SR1.5 identified  rapid and far-reaching transitions in four systems: energy, land and other ecosystems, urban and infrastructure , and industrial systems, are necessary to enable pathways to limit average global warming to 1.5℃ compared with pre-industrial temperatures . This was deepened for terrestrial systems in SRCCL, while SROCC added additional evidence from ocean and cryosphere systems. The assessment also included the interactions between carbon dioxide removal  and adaptation outcomes: compared with previous Assessment Reports, it is clear that the ambitious temperature targets agreed upon in Paris in 2015 will require at least some CDR, that is all 1.5°C pathways will eventually feature annual removals at gigaton level . This necessitates assessing the interactions of CDR with adaptation.
IPCC
Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
IPCC Report