As the polarisation of climate politics feeds into 'post-truth' politics, one response has been a call for the reassertion of a previously agreed upon 'reality'. However, it is important to recognise that knowledge has always been contested and contingent. This is particularly salient concerning climate change, where multiple truth claims compete in the media, politics, and social movements. One means of addressing this is through deliberation, where it is argued that emotional interpretations of information and lack of trust in authority can be alleviated through transparent democratic processes. Investigating a case study of climate change adaptation in a regional Australian community, we argue that while deliberation may be the preferred method of building community support, emotions can also be employed to undermine scientific authority and build a shared truth among those who see themselves as victims of the process. To this end, we suggest that more radically democratic models are needed to address climate change.
Bowden, V; Nyberg, D; Wright, C
Truth and power: deliberation and emotions in climate adaptation processes
Environmental Politics