Express frustration at the assumption that someone who criticizes a law benefiting Uber/Lyft must support the currently established taxi system. Argue that it is possible to support Uber/Lyft while still having issues with the implementation of a specific law, and criticize politicians who criticize the federal government while engaging in similar actions.
[I am highly suspect of anyone that publicly supports the taxi system that we currently have in Anchorage...Either you don't get out much or you own a taxi medallion.]
Because anyone who criticizes Uber/Lyft or even the law that benefits them must (by foolish guilt by association) be supporting the taxi system?  A person cannot possible support Uber/Lyft and still have a problem with the passage of this bill?  That the problem isn't the status quo but about how hypocrites in the Legislature constantly criticize the federal government and then do the exact same thing?