Discuss the incompetence of a board with inexperienced political appointees and a new appointee who ignores past issues that could potentially result in significant costs.
So let me get this straight: a board composed of political appointees with little to no experience in large scale infrastructure project management with an incompetent track record has a new appointee with the hubris of thinking she can go forward without looking at or resolving past issues that will probably cost significantly more money to fix? It's one thing to be intentionally blind to small issues, but deaf, dumb, blind and stupid to major cost issues is another matter altogether.