Oppose the idea of using a military property as a free speech zone for demonstrations and give reasons why it may be a liability risk for the military.
This area of military property is quite likely NOT open to the public as any type of Free Speech Zone for demonstrations and NEVER HAS BEEN.  Do you realize if the military allowed it to be that they could be liable in Tort for any person who may get injured or harmed during one of these agitated demonstrations???  I heard the demonstrators were making people driving by angry.  What if someone threw something and put a demonstrator into a coma... you think the military should accept that severe liabilty risk so you can go yell at a hotel THAT ISN'T EVEN OWNED BY TRUMP???  You people are reacting stupidly - with all due respect.  ;-)