Express an opinion about free speech, particularly in relation to a person named Breitbart.
Even in the States there are limits on free speech. You can't encourage people to participate in unlawful acts or violence. For a third time in this thread I ask, beyond the legal definitions of free speech, who gets to decide what is acceptable? This Breitbart clown is nothing but an outrage generator. If you refuse to let him speak, he has a legitimate complaint about being suppressed. Far better to let him spew his stupidity and ridicule him for it after the fact. If facts and good sense can't counter kook like this guy, what good is discourse?