Critique a report by Ms. Doolittle on the statistics of false reporting in police cases and provide your own interpretation of the numbers.
Lies, damn lies & statistics. Let’s not kid ourselves, unfounded means for the most part lies, deception, or lack of any corroborating evidence.
Ms. Doolittle’s report can be interpreted many ways. Perhaps some Police forces are better at detecting lies. Perhaps some Police arrest people regardless of any real evidence to mitigate their unfounded rate.
Her stating statistics (2-8% is accepted false reporting rate) without citation of any kind is not unusual for feminists. They like to present “alternative truths” on a regular basis.
In the feminist bubble, it’s unfathomable the rate could be higher, cause you know…’sugar & spice & all things nice’.
I wonder, if after reviewing all the past cases the Police determine they are in fact unfounded, what will Ms. Doolittle’s response be?
Admission of a much higher unfounded rate than 2-8%?, admission that women may lie more often than she currently believes? I guess we'll have to wait and see....