Critique someone's argument for not providing sources or using black-and-white thinking.
[Either you are one of those benefiting from the system and willing to carry the water too, or you have never looked very deeply into these cases]
Why am I not surprised you provided no source?  Also why am I not surprised you function under an idiotic "you're either with us or against us" black-and-white thinking.
[they will never chose the citizen over the gov]
So in every appeals case where there is no jury involved, just judges judging lower court judges, the government always wins, huh?  We don't have Miranda warnings because the Supreme Court, again no jury, decided with the government, amirite?  Or abortion rights because the Supreme Court, again no jury, decided with the Texas state government, amirite?  Or...
Might I suggest you stop commenting about stuff you clearly have no idea what you are talking about?