What is the speaker's opinion on the incident involving the mutilated men and the rabid animal? How does the speaker feel about the potential consequences of taking action against the animal? What does the speaker think about communication between those speaking out of rational thought versus those speaking out of emotion?
What if one of the three mutilated men had closed distance on this exploding rabid animal with training, a full mag, and one in the chamber.
This Christian then turned with his blade and rage on the Samaritan who carefully fired three shots center mass into the son of a bitch.
Say, one of the hollow points over-penetrated and killed or disfigured  one of those girls. Dead psycho, but also dead or crippled girl.
That's what I thought about a good share of the day yesterday. We used to say "problem solved". That's not a problem solved, it's a new one.
I trust my skill, but that small moving car,  a charging demented freak, innocents in line of fire, that's a problem likely to get worse.
The dialogue that has arisen from this painful matter has reminded me of something that I keep forgetting.
When one person speaking out of rational thought is communicating with someone speaking out of emotion, they ain't communicating.
And they never will.