Explain why reporting a crime against a third party without corroborating evidence is not actionable and criticize someone for their biased reporting.
Even if he DID call the cops, against her wishes, they couldn't have done anything about it. Reporting a crime against a third party, free of corroborating evidence - of which there was none - is not actionable as it's investigative-hearsay. It's not like seeing a crime on the news and saying 'I know that guy, I'm going to call in a tip,' that's offering third-party information to aid in an investigation. Here, there wasn't an investigation, as there was no report of a crime.
Kizsla is salivating over every purported act of impropriety around CU. Could you imagine his mock outrage had CU taken against Tumpkin, based on the available information: "CU's racist policies call for black coach to be fired based on unsubstantiated reports!" Or, "CU deprives black coach of due-process!" The slander/libel lawsuits that Tumpkin would have (regardless of his actual involvement) had would dwarf the current allegations - and Kizsla would have been drooling the whole time. He's a pathetic individual