Critique an article and a journalist for reporting a biased opinion as news. Discuss the accuracy of the article's claims and the potential political motivations behind them.
You should follow your own advice John; leave your bias behind and try reading the opinionated column masquerading as news. Notice you even quoted the relevant part, and yet you still managed to let your partisan blinders make you a useful idiot once again. Stop the Bleed is a federal program started in October of 2015, the Sandy Hook tragedy happened in December of 2012. Thus the author was right, Stop the Bleed was started after, almost 3 years after, the tragedy. And all it took was the juxtaposition of the two and the useful idiots once again draw the inaccurate conclusion sought by the illiberal collectivists pushing a political agenda because they just can't help themselves, like all good Alinsky adherents they just can't pass up an opportunity to seek political profit from a tragedy. Yes, Stop the Bleed was started after Sandy Hook, but not even the Obama administration claimed it was in response to the tragedy; that's simply the illiberal invention de jour.