What is the author's stance on gun ownership and regulation? What analogy do they use to explain their position?
Were you born stupid, or did you learn that in the corrupt union run public schools?  The victims of future crimes with these guns (if there are any) are not victims of this crime, just as GM is not responsible for a drunk driver killing someone.  They will be victims of the scum that commits the crime against them.  
If you don't like guns don't own one.  But the fact you don't like guns doesn't give you any rights to deny legally owned guns by a private citizen, a hunter, or a federally licensed gun dealer.