Discuss your opinion on McMaster's defense of Donald Trump and compare it to how George W. Bush defended his decision to invade Iraq.
It was pathetic to see McMaster attempting to defend DT. Before this, I had a lot of respect for the guy and thought he was DT's best appointment. Now, I see him making statements that refute charges that the Washington Post didn't make while avoiding comment on the charges contained in the Post's story. This kind of duplicitous messaging harkens back to W's Iraq invasion explanations, saying he was acting on information available publicly but neglecting to say he had additional information that contradicted Saddam being in collusion with Al Queda.