What is the argument being made here and what is the writer's perspective on it?
Oh, bullshit. Your opinions are as worthless as a word from Trump is a lie.  Is that all you've got, the worn out, pathetic and clearly wrong "sore loser" argument?  Are the Federal courts sore losers? Are all the AGs, legal scholars and Republican attorneys who have opined the EO is illegal sore losers? The only sore losers I see are Trump, his brown-nosing supporters and his cabinet.  It's a Muslim ban and that is illegal.