Debate the validity of a political indictment and question the reading comprehension of someone who disagrees with your stance. Also, accuse someone of having a star and mock their comment.
Try again you stupid MAGAphant.  It's clear you didn't read (or couldn't comprehend) everything in the indictment.  I'll give you another chance.  Try reading the evidentiary emails.  Especially the one where his campaign supervisor encourages him to go to Moscow to follow up.  If you want the truth, you have to know how to read - unlike your TV-watching baby-in-chief.  ps.  Is there a reason you gave yourself a 'star'.  Seems you're the only on so far that doesn't know how stupid your comment is.