What is the opinion regarding imposing restrictions that are not explicitly allowed for and how does it relate to the Constitution?
I don't see that as being the case at all but even if it were it is a lot harder to "read in" restrictions when they are not explicitly allowed for. Otherwise why bother having a constitution when we can just have a list of suggestions. IMO S1 is the biggest problem, everything problematical that follows is just piling more s**t on the s**tpile.