Provide an analysis of Milo Yiannopoulos and his relationship with Breitbart News, and the writer's opinion about his message.
Milo Yiannopoulos is a senior editor at Breitbart News. The creeps and freaks at Breitbart prop him up because, as a self-loathing gay man, MY is useful to them. They promoted his “tour” from the get-go: "Suck It Up Buttercups: Dangerous F*ggot Tour Returns in September” (7/6/2016): www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/07/06/milo-yiannopoulos-dangerous-faggot-tour-returns-campuses-fall/
MY is pathetic, more to be pitied than scorned. His message is right wing cliches that are notable only because they are spewed by a gay man who both encourages gay men to stay in the closet and flaunts his own homosexuality for profit. To protest his appearances is to treat him more seriously than he deserves. On the other hand, of course, people have every right to protest if they so choose. They do not have the right to commit violence, to do harm, to cause damage; they especially don’t have the right to stop the man from speaking. It’s incredibly stupid. It transforms a pathetic figure into a sympathetic one