What is the opinion of the writer's approach in the article, and what were some of their ad hominem attacks?
The writer makes conclusions without supporting facts.  Bizarrely, the article is full of ad hominem attacks against any disbelieving readers.  If you disagree with him you are "from the dark ages".  If you think discrimination against men is not OK, you are making a "silly argument".  I suggest the author argue his points, starting with facts, and proceeding with logic to come to his conclusions.  Instead, he assumes his conclusions are correct, and rather than use facts and logic to support his position, he simply says that anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot.  A very weak article indeed.