f6098d8b__and_Use_of_Laboratory_Animals__Comments
[ID] 452 [Entry Date] 04/23/2011 at 12:28:29 AM [Affiliation] Self [Comments] 
Comment 1: There is no good substantive reason for a new guide. Just because a guide is a few years old doesn't mean it needs to be changed. Comment 2: 2012 is unreasonable, even if there were strong reasons for a new guide. Much research would be disrupted in attempting to meet this time frame. A 4-5 year time frame would allow steady, systematic changes.
Listing of Public Comments on Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals