b1479eda_ent_Life_Cycle_Recommendations__1
[2] Yes, with revisions. [3] Delayed, pending revisions. This idea has morphed from the original recommendations, but nevertheless the thinking is moving in a positive direction, but slightly different, as group in 4d organize their work, and Scholarly Commons Coordinator & Leads launch programs in the SC. [5] ????[twc1] [1] 
f. The Library should form an eScholarship Technology Services Group to provide online scholarly services and to involve the Library in the emerging eScholarship initiatives locally and with peer institutions. This group should draw its membership from CAM, University Archives, Preservation, Library IT, the Grainger Digital Library team, the emerging Scholarly Commons team, and other pertinent areas. This initiative will advertise the benefit of digital services and will help bring new and more robust digital services directly to our users. This initiative should coordinate closely with the emerging Scholarly Commons group. There is not full agreement on the role and the title of this group, and any ambiguities need to be worked through before this type of group can get off to a productive start. It is clear from the Team's conversations that there is a concrete need for this kind of work to be organized in a functional cross-cutting group. The RTG process should include planning and discussion of this group and its role in collaborative technology development.
Digital Content Life Cycle Recommendations