f6098d8b__and_Use_of_Laboratory_Animals__Comments
[ID] 361 [Entry Date] 04/21/2011 at 03:32:29 PM [Affiliation] Organization [Organization Name] University of Nevada, Reno [Organization City and State] Reno, NV [Comments] 
Comment 1: I do not endorse adoption of the eight edition. The new revisions do not in any way enhance treatment of existing laboratory animals and levy unnecessary expenses on scientists. The 1996 edition of the guide is more than sufficient to secure humane treatment of animals in a research context. Comment 2: I unequivocally reject the eight edition and endorse the continued use of the 1996 guide as a standard of practice.
Listing of Public Comments on Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals