467878d5_ocs_328404_new____Eclipsepedia__composite_member_pu
[PersistenceUnitProperties.] DESCRIPTOR_CUSTOMIZER_* [property name] eclipselink.descriptor.customizer.* [composite pu] ignored [comment] TODO? Should we follow the same pattern as SessionCustomizer and process composite's DescriptorCustomizers after members' ones? [composite member pu] 
processed
a d v a n c e d
p r o c e s s e d
i g n o r e d
Difference between revisions of "EclipseLink/DesignDocs/328404 new" - Eclipsepedia