1f3395d8_Recent_Comments___mgoblog__Title
[Date] 12 weeks 23 hours ago [Body] I'm interested to see if part of the due diligence on behalf of the Seahawks included determining where other teams had him ranked on their draft boards. He went in the second round, which tells me that the Seahawks weren't the only ones interested in him early. I'm not convinced that the Seahawks didn't do their due diligence. I think they assessed the liabilities and decided that he was worth the PR risk. The Seahawks also didn't have a glaring need for a DE which tells me that they might handle the fallout a little better than other teams that need depth at the position. As it is, however, I don't think the Seahawks failed everyone. I think they failed the family of the victim, but they didn't not fail anyone any more than other teams do when they resign or give chances to players with suspicious backgrounds. The Cincinnati Bengals are a prime example of a team that regularly signs players with records. That in no way excuses what happened with Clark, but it's a bit of a blanket statement to condemn the Seahawks for doing exactly what every other team does on a regular basis. The issue is not with the team, it's with the NFL giving lip service to victims of domestic violence but not enforcing regulations or punishing teams for signing players with criminal histories. The problem is, with the media attention span, this will be forgotten as soon as the next story crops up. Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad [Title] 
I'm interested to see if part
Recent Comments | mgoblog