0
SPEAKER_01
The following is a conversation with Brian Greene, theoretical physicist at Columbia and author of many amazing books on physics, including his latest, Until the End of Time, Mind, Matter, and Our Search for Meaning in an Evolving Universe.
0
SPEAKER_01
And now, a quick few seconds summary of the sponsors.
0
SPEAKER_01
Check them out in the description.
0
SPEAKER_01
It s the best way to support this podcast.
0
SPEAKER_01
First is Prisoner Wine, my wine of choice.
0
SPEAKER_01
Second is Blinkist, the app I use to read summaries of books.
0
SPEAKER_01
Third is Element, my go-to electrolyte drink mix.
0
SPEAKER_01
Fourth is BetterHelp, an online therapy service.
0
SPEAKER_01
And fifth is NI, a company that helps engineers solve the world s toughest problems.
0
SPEAKER_01
So the choice is wine, books, electrolytes, mental health, or the power of engineering.
0
SPEAKER_01
Choose wisely, my friends.
0
SPEAKER_01
And now onto the full ad reads.
0
SPEAKER_01
As always, no ads in the middle.
0
SPEAKER_01
I try to make these interesting, but if you skip them, please still check out the sponsors.
0
SPEAKER_01
I enjoy their stuff.
0
SPEAKER_01
Maybe you will too.
0
SPEAKER_01
This show is brought to you by a new sponsor that I love, called Prisoner Wine.
0
SPEAKER_01
My wine of choice, beautiful artwork on the bottle, delicious taste, especially their Prisoner Cabernet Sauvignon, paired, of course, for me, with a nice steak.
0
SPEAKER_01
There are few things I enjoy in life as much as a great red wine with a great steak.
0
SPEAKER_01
That is happiness for me.
0
SPEAKER_01
Maybe sitting across from an old friend, talking about life, the universe.
0
SPEAKER_01
Or maybe not talking at all, just enjoying the food.
0
SPEAKER_01
Go to theprisonerwine.com slash lex for 20% off plus shipping included on your first purchase.
0
SPEAKER_01
We can toast to the holidays together with the same wine if you go to theprisonerwine.com slash lex.
0
SPEAKER_01
That s theprisonerwine.com slash lex.
0
SPEAKER_01
Offer is valid on first-time online orders only for U.S.
0
SPEAKER_01
residents of legal drinking age through the end of December 2021.
0
SPEAKER_01
Other exclusions may apply.
0
SPEAKER_01
Please enjoy wines responsibly.
0
SPEAKER_01
This show is also brought to you by Blinkist, my favorite app for learning new things.
0
SPEAKER_01
Blinkist takes the key ideas from thousands of nonfiction books and condenses them down into just 15 minutes that you can read or listen to.
0
SPEAKER_01
My recommendations here are endless.
0
SPEAKER_01
Maybe the big books that pop to mind are Sapiens, Meditations by Marcus Aurelius, Beginning of Infinity by David Deutsch.
0
SPEAKER_01
Obviously, I love that book, and Blinkist does a great job of summarizing it.
0
SPEAKER_01
The Snowden book is on there.
0
SPEAKER_01
I mean, the list goes on and on.
0
SPEAKER_01
I enjoy using Blinkist to remind me of the core ideas in the books I ve read, but I also use it to help me select the books that I m going to read in the future.
0
SPEAKER_01
Go to Blinkist.com slash Lex to start your free seven-day trial and get 25% off of a Blinkist premium membership.
0
SPEAKER_01
That s Blinkist.com slash Lex, spelled B-L-I-N-K-I-S-T, Blinkist.com slash Lex.
0
SPEAKER_01
This episode is also brought to you by Element Electrolyte Drink Mix, spelled L-M-N-T.
0
SPEAKER_01
To do low-carb diets correctly, I think the number one thing you have to get right is electrolytes, specifically sodium, potassium, and magnesium.
0
SPEAKER_01
Element is my go-to drink.
0
SPEAKER_01
I don t know how many I drink a day, but it s a lot.
0
SPEAKER_01
It s delicious, and like I said, it s essential to the kind of diet that I practice.
0
SPEAKER_01
So both the intermittent fasting part of it, and also the keto or the carnivore part of it.
0
SPEAKER_01
And honestly, it s kind of magic how much of a difference electrolytes make in a diet.
0
SPEAKER_01
So they call it the keto flu.
0
SPEAKER_01
So if you re not feeling well, getting the right amount of salt and water in your system, it s just, it s incredible how much of a difference that makes.
0
SPEAKER_01
Olympians use it.
0
SPEAKER_01
Tech people use it.
0
SPEAKER_01
I swear by this stuff.
0
SPEAKER_01
Try it at drinkelement.com slash lex.
0
SPEAKER_01
That s drinkelement.com slash lex.
0
SPEAKER_01
This episode is also brought to you by BetterHelp, spelled H-E-L-P, help.
0
SPEAKER_01
They figure out what you need and match you with a licensed professional therapist in under 48 hours.
0
SPEAKER_01
When I was young, I ve dreamed about being a psychiatrist.
0
SPEAKER_01
I was curious about the human mind and I thought one of the best ways, practically speaking, to explore the human mind is by interacting with individual people and diving together deep into their mind.
0
SPEAKER_01
I got a little bit disillusioned by psychiatry as a discipline because drugs became such a big part of that field, basically the prescription of drugs.
0
SPEAKER_01
But nevertheless, talk therapy is still part of that field and is the thing I really believe in.
0
SPEAKER_01
So I definitely think that should be part of the tools you use in your life is therapy.
0
SPEAKER_01
BetterHelp, I think, is definitely a great option to consider because it s easy, private, affordable, and available worldwide.
0
SPEAKER_01
Check them out at betterhelp.com slash flex.
0
SPEAKER_01
That s betterhelp.com slash flex.
0
SPEAKER_01
This show is also brought to you by NI, formerly known as National Instruments.
0
SPEAKER_01
NI is a company that has been helping engineers to solve the world s toughest challenges for 40 years.
0
SPEAKER_01
Their motto, probably one of my favorite mottos for a company, is engineer ambitiously.
0
SPEAKER_01
They have a podcast called Testing 123,
0
SPEAKER_01
They have amazing articles at ni.com slash perspectives covering engineers, innovators, and they emphasize the power of failure through testing.
0
SPEAKER_01
So fail often and fast in the beginning to figure out what the problems are so you can solve them before you deploy the system.
0
SPEAKER_01
That is engineering.
0
SPEAKER_01
That is what I love about engineering.
0
SPEAKER_01
It s deeply honest.
0
SPEAKER_01
you re confronting the realities, the physics of nature.
0
SPEAKER_01
Engineer ambitiously with NI at ni.com slash perspectives.
0
SPEAKER_01
That s ni.com slash perspectives.
0
SPEAKER_01
This is the Lex Friedman Podcast, and here is my conversation with Brian Green.
0
SPEAKER_01
In your most recent book, Until the End of Time, you quote Bertrand Russell from a debate he had about God in 1948.
0
SPEAKER_01
He says, quote, so far as scientific evidence goes, the universe has crawled by slow stages to a somewhat pitiful result on this earth and is going to crawl by still more pitiful stages to a condition of universal death.
0
SPEAKER_01
If this is to be taken as evidence of purpose, I can only say that the purpose is one that does not appeal to me.
0
SPEAKER_01
I see no reason, therefore, to believe in any sort of God.
0
SPEAKER_01
That s quite a depressing statement.
0
SPEAKER_01
As you say, this is a bleak outlook on our universe and the emergence of human consciousness.
0
SPEAKER_01
So let me ask, what is the more hopeful perspective to take on this story?
0
SPEAKER_00
Well, I think the more hopeful perspective is to more fully understand what was driving Bertrand Russell to this perspective, and then to see it within a broader context.
0
SPEAKER_00
And really, that s in some sense what my book, Until the End of Time, is all about.
0
SPEAKER_00
But in brief, I would say that there s a lot of truth to what Bertrand Russell was saying there.
0
SPEAKER_00
When you look at the second law of thermodynamics, which is the underlying scientific idea that s driving this notion that everything s going to wither, decay, fall apart, yeah, that s true.
0
SPEAKER_00
Second law of thermodynamics establishes that
0
SPEAKER_00
Disorder, entropy in aggregate is always on the rise.
0
SPEAKER_00
And that is indeed interpretable as disintegration and destruction over sufficiently long timescales.
0
SPEAKER_00
But my view is when you recognize how special that makes us,
0
SPEAKER_00
that we are these exquisitely ordered configurations of particles that only will last for a blink of an eye in cosmological time-like terms.
0
SPEAKER_00
The fact that we re here and we can do what we do, to me, that s just really something that inspires gratitude and wonder and a sense of
0
SPEAKER_00
of deep purpose by virtue of being these unique collections of entities that happen to rise up, look around and try to figure out where we are and what the heck we should do with our time.
0
SPEAKER_00
So it s not that I would disagree with Bertrand Russell in terms of the basic physics and the basic unfolding, but I think it s really a matter of the slant that you take on what it means for us.
0
SPEAKER_01
So maybe we ll skip around a bit, but let me ask the biggest possible question then.
0
SPEAKER_01
You said purpose, so what s the meaning of it all then?
0
SPEAKER_01
Is there a meaning to life that we can take from this?
0
SPEAKER_01
From this brief emergence of complexity that arises from simple things and then goes into a heat death that is once again returns to simple things as the march of the second law of thermodynamics goes on.
0
SPEAKER_00
I think there is, but I don t think it s a universal answer.
0
SPEAKER_00
And so I think throughout the ages, there has been a kind of quest for some final way of articulating meaning and purpose, whether it s God, whether it s love, whether it s companionship.
0
SPEAKER_00
I mean, many people put forward different ways of taking this question on.
0
SPEAKER_00
And there is no one right answer when you recognize deeply
0
SPEAKER_00
that the universe doesn t care.
0
SPEAKER_00
There is nothing out there that is the final answer.
0
SPEAKER_00
It s not as though we need a more powerful telescope and somehow if we can look deeply into the universe, all will become clear.
0
SPEAKER_00
In fact, the deeper we ve looked, both literally and metaphorically,
0
SPEAKER_00
into the universe and into the structure of reality, the more it s become clear that we are just a momentary byproduct of laws of physics that don t have any emotional content.
0
SPEAKER_00
They don t have any intrinsic sense of meaning or purpose.
0
SPEAKER_00
And when you recognize that, you realize that searching for the universal for this kind of a question is a fool s errand.
0
SPEAKER_00
Every individual has the capacity to make their own meaning, to set their own purpose.
0
SPEAKER_00
And that s not some platitude, that is what we are.
0
SPEAKER_00
Because there is no fundamental answer, it s what you make of it.
0
SPEAKER_00
And however much that may sound like a hallmark card, this really is the deep lesson of physics and science more generally over the past few hundred years.
0
SPEAKER_01
But there s some level where you can objectively say that whatever we got going on here, it s kind of peculiar.
0
SPEAKER_01
It s kind of special in terms of complexity.
0
SPEAKER_01
And maybe you can even begin to measure it and like come up with metrics where whatever we got going on on earth, these like,
0
SPEAKER_01
interesting hierarchical complexities that form more and more sophisticated biological systems.
0
SPEAKER_01
That seems kind of unique when you look at the entirety of the universe, the observable part that we can see with our tools.
0
SPEAKER_01
So I have to ask, as you describe in your book once again, Schrodinger wrote the book, What is Life?
0
SPEAKER_01
Based on a few lectures he gave in 1944.
0
SPEAKER_01
So let me ask the fundamental question here.
0
SPEAKER_01
What is life, this particular thing we ve got going on here, this pocket of complexity that emerged from such simple things?
0
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, it s a tough question.
0
SPEAKER_00
I asked that question even to Richard Dawkins once, and I already had my preconceived notion, which he pretty much confirmed, which is,
0
SPEAKER_00
If one could give an answer to that question that allowed you to sort of draw a line in the sand between the not living and the living, then perhaps we would have
0
SPEAKER_00
the insight that we yearn for in trying to say what is so special about life.
0
SPEAKER_00
But the fact of the matter is, it s a continuum.
0
SPEAKER_00
There s a continuum from the things that we would typically call non-living inanimate to the things that we obviously call animate and full of the currents of life.
0
SPEAKER_00
Somewhere in there,
0
SPEAKER_00
It is a question of the complexity of the structure, the ability of the structure to take in raw material from the environment and process it through a metabolism that allows the structure to extract energy and to release entropy to the wider environment.
0
SPEAKER_00
Somewhere in those collections of biological processes is the necessity or the necessary ingredients and processes for life.
0
SPEAKER_00
Drawing that line in the sand is not something that we re able to do, but I would agree with you.
0
SPEAKER_00
It s deeply peculiar.
0
SPEAKER_00
It may, in fact, be unique, but it may not.
0
SPEAKER_00
It could be that the universe is such that under fairly typical conditions, a star that s a well-ordered source of low
0
SPEAKER_00
entropy energy, that s what the sun is, together with the planet being bathed by that low entropy energy together with a surface that has enough of the raw constituents that we recognize are fairly commonplace result of supernova explosions where star spews forth the result of the nuclear furnace that is the core of a star.
0
SPEAKER_00
It could be that all you need are those fairly commonplace conditions
0
SPEAKER_00
and maybe life naturally forms.
0
SPEAKER_00
Look, the James Webb Space Telescope, right, is going up, hopefully, in December.
0
SPEAKER_00
And one of the goals of that mission is to look at atmospheres around distant planets and perhaps come to some sense of how special or not life, or life as we know it, is in the universe.
0
SPEAKER_01
Which part of the story of life, let s stick to Earth for a second, do you think is the hardest?
0
SPEAKER_01
If you were like,
0
SPEAKER_01
A betting man, which part is the hardest to make happen?
0
SPEAKER_01
Is it the origin of life?
0
SPEAKER_01
Again, we haven t drawn the line where, as you say, the line between a rock and a rabbit.
0
SPEAKER_01
That part, is it complex organisms like multicellular organisms?
0
SPEAKER_01
Is it crawling out of the ocean where the fish somehow figured out how to crawl around?
0
SPEAKER_01
Is it then the us homo sapiens as we like to think of ourselves as special and intelligent?
0
SPEAKER_01
Or is it somewhere in between as you also talk about, again, very hard to know at which point this consciousness.
0
SPEAKER_01
Emerge like if you if you were to sort of took us a survey made bets about other earth-like planets in the universe Where do you think they get stuck the most?
0
SPEAKER_00
Well, I would certainly see if we re gonna go all the way to conscious beings like ourselves I would put it at the onset of consciousness which again is
0
SPEAKER_00
I think is a continuum.
0
SPEAKER_00
I don t think it is something that you can draw the line in the sand, but there are obvious circumstances, there are obvious creatures such as ourselves where we do recognize a certain kind of self-reflective conscious awareness.
0
SPEAKER_00
And if we think about what it would require for a system of living beings to acquire consciousness,
0
SPEAKER_00
I think that s probably the hardest part because, look, take Earth and recognize that it weren t for some singular event 65 million years ago where this large rock slams into planet Earth and wipes out the dinosaurs.
0
SPEAKER_00
Maybe the dinosaurs would still rule the planet.
0
SPEAKER_00
they may well have not developed the kind of conscious awareness that we have.
0
SPEAKER_00
So for billions of years on this planet, there was life that didn t have the kind of conscious awareness that we have.
0
SPEAKER_00
And it was an accidental event in astrophysical history that allowed a mammalian species like us to ultimately be the end product.
0
SPEAKER_00
And so, yeah, I could imagine there s a lot of life out there,
0
SPEAKER_00
But perhaps none of it s wondering what s the meaning of life or trying to make sense of it, just going about its business of survival, which, of course, is the dominant activity that life on this planet has practiced.
0
SPEAKER_00
We are a rare exception to that.
0
SPEAKER_01
And I really appreciate that you lean into some of these unanswerable questions with me today.
0
SPEAKER_01
So you think about consciousness not as like a phase shift, the binary zero one.
0
SPEAKER_01
You think of it as a continuum that humans somehow are maybe some of the most conscious beings on earth.
0
SPEAKER_01
So you re, so,
0
SPEAKER_00
I mean, people will dispute that.
0
SPEAKER_00
Yes.
0
SPEAKER_00
I mean, well, and it s a very hard argument.
0
SPEAKER_00
People will dispute that.
0
SPEAKER_00
Rocks probably will stay quiet on the matter.
0
SPEAKER_00
Maybe not.
0
SPEAKER_00
Right.
0
SPEAKER_00
For the moment, they re waiting for their opportunity.
0
SPEAKER_00
But I agree that
0
SPEAKER_00
Look, even when you and I look at each other, I am not fully convinced that you re a conscious being, right?
0
SPEAKER_00
I mean, I think that you are.
0
SPEAKER_00
I mean, your behavior is such that that s the best explanation for what s going on.
0
SPEAKER_00
But of course, we re all in the position of only having direct awareness of our own conscious
0
SPEAKER_00
And therefore, when it comes to other creatures in the world, we re in a similar state of ignorance regarding what s actually happening inside of their head, if they have a head.
0
SPEAKER_00
And so it s hard to know.
1
SPEAKER_01
how singular we are, but I would say, based on the best available data and the best explanations that we can make, yeah, there is something special about us.
1
SPEAKER_01
I don t think that there are fish walking around and, you know, coming up with, you know, existentialism.
1
SPEAKER_01
I don t know that there are, you know, dogs walking around who ve developed an understanding of the general theory of relativity.
1
SPEAKER_01
I mean, maybe we re wrong, but that seems the best explanation.
1
SPEAKER_00
What do you think is more special, intelligence or consciousness?
1
SPEAKER_01
I think consciousness, and I think that there s a deep connection between these ideas.
1
SPEAKER_01
They are distinct, but they re deeply connected.
1
SPEAKER_01
But look, I mean, to me, and to, of course, many philosophers, I actually coined a name for this, the hard problem of consciousness.
1
SPEAKER_01
David Chalmers and others.
1
SPEAKER_01
As a physicist, I look at the world, and I see its particles governed by physical law.
1
SPEAKER_01
We can name them.
1
SPEAKER_01
We got electrons, we got quarks that come in various flavors and so forth.
1
SPEAKER_01
We have a list of ingredients that science has revealed.
1
SPEAKER_01
And we have a list of laws that seemingly govern those ingredients.
1
SPEAKER_01
And nowhere in there is there even a hint that when you put those particles together in the right way, an inner world should turn on.
1
SPEAKER_01
And it s not only that there s no hint,
1
SPEAKER_01
It s insane.
1
SPEAKER_01
I mean, it s ridiculous.
1
SPEAKER_01
How could it be that a thoughtless, passionless, emotionless particle, when grouped together with compatriots, somehow can yield something so deeply foreign to the nature of the ingredients themselves?
1
SPEAKER_01
So answering that question,
1
SPEAKER_01
I think is among the deepest and most difficult questions that we face.
1
SPEAKER_00
Do you think it is in fact a really hard problem?
1
SPEAKER_00
Or is it possible, I think you mentioned in your book, that it s just like almost like a side effect, it s an emergent thing that s like, oh, it s nice.
1
SPEAKER_00
It s like a nice little feature.
1
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, well, I mean, when people use the phrase hard problem, I mean, they mean in a somewhat technical sense that
1
SPEAKER_01
it s trying to explain something that seems fundamentally unavailable to third party objective analysis, right?
1
SPEAKER_01
I m the only one that can get inside my head and I can tell you a lot about what s happening inside my head right now is reflected in what I m saying and you can try to deduce things about what s going on inside my head but you don t have access to it in the way that I do.
1
SPEAKER_01
And so it seems like a fundamentally different kind of problem from the ones that we have
1
SPEAKER_01
successfully dealt with over the course of centuries in science where we look at the motion of the moon.
1
SPEAKER_01
Everybody can look, everybody can measure it.
1
SPEAKER_01
We look at the properties of hydrogen when you shine lasers on.
1
SPEAKER_01
Everybody can look at the data and understand it.
1
SPEAKER_01
And so it seems like a fundamentally different problem.
1
SPEAKER_01
And in that sense, it seems like it is hard relative to the others.
1
SPEAKER_01
But I do think ultimately that the explanation will be
1
SPEAKER_01
As you recount, I think that 100 years from now, or maybe it s 1,000, it s hard to predict the timescale for developments, but I think we ll get to a place where we ll look back and kind of smile at those folks in the 20th century and before, 21st century and before, who thought consciousness was so incredibly mysterious, when the reality of it is, eh, it s just a thing that happens.
1
SPEAKER_01
when particles come together.
1
SPEAKER_01
And however mysterious that feels right now, I think, for instance, when we start to build conscious systems, things that you re more familiar with than I am, when we start to build these artificial systems, and those systems report to us, I m feeling sad.
1
SPEAKER_01
I m feeling anxious.
1
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, there s a world going on inside here.
1
SPEAKER_01
I think the mystery of consciousness will just begin to evaporate.
1
SPEAKER_00
First of all, beautifully put, and I agree with you completely.
1
SPEAKER_00
Just the way you said it, it ll begin to evaporate.
1
SPEAKER_00
I have built quite a few robots and have had them do emotional type things, and it s immediate that exactly what you re saying, this kind of mystery of consciousness starts to evaporate, that the kind of need to truly understand, to solve the hard problem of consciousness disappears because, well, I don t really care
1
SPEAKER_00
if I understand or can solve the hard problem of consciousness, that thing sure as heck looks conscious.
1
SPEAKER_00
I feel like that way when I interact with a dog.
1
SPEAKER_00
I don t need to solve the problem of consciousness to be able to interact and richly enjoy the experience with this other living being.
1
SPEAKER_00
Obviously, same thing with other humans.
1
SPEAKER_00
I don t need to fully understand it.
1
SPEAKER_00
And there s some aspect,
1
SPEAKER_00
Maybe this is a little bit too engineering focused, but there s some aspect in which it feels like consciousness is just a nice trick to help us communicate with each other.
1
SPEAKER_00
It sounds ridiculous to say, but sort of a...
1
SPEAKER_00
the ability to experience the world is very useful in a subjective sense, is very useful to put yourself in that world and to be able to describe the experience to others.
1
SPEAKER_00
It could be just a social and the emerge, obviously animals, the sort of more primitive animals might experience consciousness in some more primitive way.
1
SPEAKER_00
but this kind of rich subjective experience that we think about as humans, I think it s probably deeply coupled with like language and poetry.
1
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, that resonates with my view as well.
1
SPEAKER_01
I mean, there s a scientist, maybe you ve spoken to him, Michael Graziano from Princeton.
1
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, he s developed ideas of consciousness that, look, I don t think they solve the problem, but I think they do illuminate it in an interesting way where basically we,
1
SPEAKER_01
are not aware of all the underlying physiochemical processes that make our brains and our inner worlds tick the way they do.
1
SPEAKER_01
And because of that dissociation between sensation and the physics of it and the chemistry of it and the biology of it, it feels like our minds and our inner worlds are just untethered, like floating somewhere in this gray matter inside of our heads.
1
SPEAKER_01
And the way I like to think of it is like, look, you know, if you were in a dark room, right, and I had glow-in-the-dark paint on my fingers, so all you saw was my fingers dancing around, there d be something mysterious.
1
SPEAKER_01
How could those fingers be doing that?
1
SPEAKER_01
And then you turn on the light, you realize, oh, there s this arm.
1
SPEAKER_01
underlying it, and that s the deep physical connection explains it all.
1
SPEAKER_01
And I think that s what we re missing, the deep physical connection between what s happening up here and what is responsible for it in a physical, chemical, biological way.
1
SPEAKER_01
And so to me, that at least gives me some understanding of why consciousness feels so mysterious, because we are suppressing all of the underlying
1
SPEAKER_01
science that ultimately is responsible for it.
1
SPEAKER_01
And one day we will reveal that more fully.
1
SPEAKER_01
And I think that will help us tether this experience to something quite tangible in the world.
1
SPEAKER_00
I wonder if the mystery is an important component of enjoying something.
1
SPEAKER_00
So once we know how this thing works, maybe we
1
SPEAKER_00
will no longer enjoy like this conversation.
1
SPEAKER_00
We ll seek other sources of enjoyment, but there s a, this is again from an engineering perspective, I wonder if the mystery is an important component.
1
SPEAKER_01
Well, you know, there s, have you ever seen, there s this beautiful interview that Richard Feynman did, you know, great Nobel laureate physicist responsible for a lot of our understanding of quantum mechanics, quantum field theory and so forth.
1
SPEAKER_01
was in a conversation with an interviewer where he noted that some people feel like once the mystery is gone, once science explains something, the beauty goes away, the wonder of it goes away.
1
SPEAKER_01
And he was emphasizing his response to that.
1
SPEAKER_01
He s like, no, that s not the right way of thinking about it.
1
SPEAKER_01
He says, look, when I look at a rose,
1
SPEAKER_01
He says, yeah, I can still deeply enjoy the aroma, the color, the texture.
1
SPEAKER_01
He says, but what I can do that you can t if you re not a physicist, I can look more deeply and understand where the red comes from, where the aroma comes from, where the structure comes from.
1
SPEAKER_01
He says, that only augments my wonder.
1
SPEAKER_01
It only augments my experience.
1
SPEAKER_01
It doesn t flatten it or take away from it.
1
SPEAKER_01
So I sort of- I hope he s right.
1
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, well I sort of take that as a bit of a,
1
SPEAKER_01
of a motto in some sense, that there is a wonder that comes from a kind of ignorance.
1
SPEAKER_01
And I don t mean that in a derogatory sense, but just from not knowing.
1
SPEAKER_01
So there is a wonder that comes from mystery.
1
SPEAKER_01
There s another kind of wonder that comes from knowing and deep knowing.
1
SPEAKER_01
And I think that kind of wonder has its own special character that in some ways can be more gratifying.
1
SPEAKER_00
I hope he s right.
1
SPEAKER_00
I hope you re right.
1
SPEAKER_00
But there s also, I remember he said something about like science is an onion or something like that.
1
SPEAKER_00
You can peel back, you can keep peeling back.
1
SPEAKER_00
I mean, there is also, when you understand something, there s always a sense that there s more mystery to understand.
1
SPEAKER_00
You never get to the bottom of the mystery.
1
SPEAKER_01
But I think it s also different than, you know, I don t think you can analogize, say, to a magician, right?
1
SPEAKER_01
A magician does some trick, you learn how it s done, it s like, oh my God, that s ridiculous when you find, but nature is perhaps the best magician, if you wanna try to make the analogy there, because when you peel things back and you understand how it is that things have color and you have electrons,
1
SPEAKER_01
dancing from one orbital to another, emitting photons at very particular wavelengths that are described by these beautiful equations of quantum electrodynamics, part of which that Feynman developed, it gives you a greater sense of awe when the curtain is pulled back than what happens in other circumstances where it does flatten it completely.
1
SPEAKER_00
Yes, it s very possible then, say in physics, that we arrive at a theory of everything that unifies the laws of physics and has a very strong understanding of the fabric of reality.
1
SPEAKER_00
Even like from the Big Bang to today, it s possible that
1
SPEAKER_00
that understanding is only going to elevate our appreciation of this whole thing.
1
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, I think it will.
1
SPEAKER_01
I think it will.
1
SPEAKER_01
I mean, it has it has so far.
1
SPEAKER_01
But the other side of it, which you which you emphasize is, it s not like science somehow
1
SPEAKER_01
reaches an end, right?
1
SPEAKER_01
There are certain categories of questions that do reach an end.
1
SPEAKER_01
I think we one day will close the book on nature s ingredients and the fundamental laws.
1
SPEAKER_01
Now that, we can t prove that.
1
SPEAKER_01
Maybe it goes on forever, smaller and smaller.
1
SPEAKER_01
Maybe there are deeper and deeper laws, but I don t think so.
1
SPEAKER_01
I think that there s going to be a collection of ingredients and a collection of basic laws.
1
SPEAKER_01
That chapter will close, but
1
SPEAKER_01
It s one chapter.
1
SPEAKER_01
Now we take that knowledge and we try to understand how the world builds the structures that it does, you know, from planets to people to black holes to the possibility of other universes.
1
SPEAKER_01
And every step of the way, the collection of questions that we don t know the answer to only blossoms.
1
SPEAKER_01
And so there s a deep sense of gratification from understanding certain qualities of the world.
1
SPEAKER_01
But I would say that if you take a ratio
1
SPEAKER_01
of what we understand to the things that we know that we don t yet understand, that ratio keeps getting smaller and smaller because the things that we know that we don t understand grows larger and larger.
1
SPEAKER_00
Do you have a hope that we solve that theory of everything puzzle in the next few decades?
1
SPEAKER_00
So there s been a bunch of attempts from string theory to all kinds of attempts at trying to solve quantum gravity, or basically come up with a theory for quantum gravity.
1
SPEAKER_00
There s a lot of complexities to this.
1
SPEAKER_00
One, for experimental validation, you have to observe effects that are very difficult to measure.
1
SPEAKER_00
So you have to build, that s like an engineering challenge.
1
SPEAKER_00
And then there s the theory challenge, which is like, it seems very difficult to connect the laws of gravity to quantum mechanics.
1
SPEAKER_00
Do you have a hope or are we hopelessly stuck?
1
SPEAKER_01
Well, I have to have to have a hope.
1
SPEAKER_01
I mean, it s in some sense, but I devote at least part of my professional life toward trying to make progress on I m glad you use the phrase quantum gravity.
1
SPEAKER_01
I m not a great fan of the theory of everything phrase because it does make other scientists feel like if they re not working on this, what are they working on?
1
SPEAKER_01
Man s like, you know, there s not much left when you re talking about theory of everything.
1
SPEAKER_01
Phylogy is just small details, we ll figure out.
1
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, so it is really trying to put gravity and quantum mechanics together.
1
SPEAKER_01
And since I was a college kid, I was deeply fascinated with gravity.
1
SPEAKER_01
And as I learned quantum mechanics,
1
SPEAKER_01
the notion of physicists being stumped and trying to blend them together.
1
SPEAKER_01
How could one not get fired up about maybe contributing something to that journey?
1
SPEAKER_01
And so we ve been on this, you know, I ve been on this for 30 years since I was a student.
1
SPEAKER_01
We have made progress.
1
SPEAKER_01
We do have ideas, you mentioned string theory as one possible scenario.
1
SPEAKER_01
It s not stuck.
1
SPEAKER_01
String theory is a vibrant field of research that is making incredible progress, but we ve not made progress on this issue of experimental verification, validation, which as you know,
1
SPEAKER_01
vital part of the story.
1
SPEAKER_01
So I would have hoped that by now, we would have made contact with observation.
1
SPEAKER_01
If you would have interviewed me back in the 80s, when I was, you know, a wild, bright-eyed kid trying to make headway, working 18 hours a day and this sort of stuff, I would have said, yeah, by 2021, yeah, we re gonna know whether it s right or wrong, we ll have made contact.
1
SPEAKER_01
I would have said, look, there may be certain mathematical puzzles that we ve yet to work out, but we ll know enough to make contact with experiment.
1
SPEAKER_01
That has not happened.
1
SPEAKER_01
On the other hand, if you would have interviewed me back then and asked me, will we be able to talk about detailed qualities of black holes and understand them at the level of detail that we actually, I would have said no, I don t think that we re gonna be able to do that.
1
SPEAKER_01
Will we have an exact formulation of strength theory in certain circumstances?
1
SPEAKER_01
No, I don t think we re gonna have that, and yet we do.
1
SPEAKER_01
So it s just to say you don t know where the progress is going to happen.
1
SPEAKER_01
But yes, I do hold out hope that maybe before I move on to wherever, I don t think there is an after, but I would love before I leave this earth to know the answer.
1
SPEAKER_01
But you know, science and the universe, it s not about pleasing any individual.
1
SPEAKER_01
It is what it is.
1
SPEAKER_01
And so we just press onward and we ll see where it goes.
1
SPEAKER_00
So in terms of string theory, if I just look from an outsider s perspective currently at the theoretical physics community, string theory as a theory has been very popular for a few decades, but it has recently fallen out of favor, or at least there s been like
1
SPEAKER_00
you know, it became more popular to kind of ask the question, is string theory really the answer?
1
SPEAKER_00
Where do you fall on this?
1
SPEAKER_00
Like, how do you make sense of this puzzle?
1
SPEAKER_00
Why do you think it s fallen out of favor?
1
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, so I would actually challenge the statement that s fallen out of favor.
1
SPEAKER_01
I would say that any
1
SPEAKER_01
field of research when it s new and it s the bright, shiny bicycle that no one has yet seen on that block, yeah, it s gonna attract attention and the news outlets are gonna cover it and students are gonna flock to it, sure.
1
SPEAKER_01
But as a field matures, it does shed those qualities because it s no longer as novel as it was when it was first introduced 30, 40 years ago.
1
SPEAKER_01
But you need to judge it by a different standard.
1
SPEAKER_01
You need to judge it by, is it making progress on foundational issues deepening our understanding of the subject?
1
SPEAKER_01
And by that measure, string theory is scoring very high.
1
SPEAKER_01
Now, at the same time, you also need to judge whether it makes contact with experiment, as we discussed before, too, and in that measure, we re still challenged.
1
SPEAKER_01
So I would say that many string theorists, myself included, are very sober about the theory.
1
SPEAKER_01
It has the tremendous progress that it had 30, 40 years ago, that hasn t gone away, but we ve become better equipped at assessing
1
SPEAKER_01
the long journey ahead.
1
SPEAKER_01
And that was something that we weren t particularly good at back, say, in the 80s.
1
SPEAKER_01
Look, when I was just starting out in the field, there was a sense of physics is about to end.
1
SPEAKER_01
String theory is about to be the be-all and end-all final unified theory, and that will bring this chapter to a close.
1
SPEAKER_01
Now, I have to say, I think it was more the younger physicists who were saying that.
1
SPEAKER_01
Some of them were seasoned, even if they were pro-string theory at the time.
1
SPEAKER_01
I don t know if they were rolling their eyes, but they knew that it was gonna be a long, long journey.
1
SPEAKER_01
I think people like John Schwartz, one of the founders of string theory, Michael Green, no relation to me, founders of the theory,
1
SPEAKER_01
Edward Witten, you know, one of the main people driving the theory back then and today.
1
SPEAKER_01
I think they knew that we were in for a long haul.
1
SPEAKER_01
And that s the nature of science.
1
SPEAKER_01
Quick hits that resolve everything.
1
SPEAKER_01
Few and far between.
1
SPEAKER_01
And so if you were in for the quick solution to the big questions of the world, then you would have been disappointed.
1
SPEAKER_01
And I think there were people who were disappointed and moved on and work on other subjects.
1
SPEAKER_01
If you re in in the way that Einstein
2
SPEAKER_00
was in for a lifetime of investigation to try to see what the answers to the deep questions would be, then I think string theory has been a rich source of material that has kept so many people deeply engaged in moving the frontier forward.
2
SPEAKER_01
There s a few qualities about string theory which are weird.
2
SPEAKER_01
I mean, a lot of physics is just weird.
2
SPEAKER_01
and beautiful.
2
SPEAKER_01
So let me ask the question, what to you is most beautiful about strength theory?
2
SPEAKER_00
Well, what attracted me to the theory at the outset
2
SPEAKER_00
beyond its putting gravity and quantum mechanics together, which I think is its true claim to fame, at least on paper it s able to do that.
2
SPEAKER_00
What attracted me to the theory was the fact that it requires extra dimensions of space.
2
SPEAKER_00
And this was an idea that intrigued me in a very deep way, even before I really understood what it meant.
2
SPEAKER_00
I somehow had, I mean, talk about sort of the emotional part of consciousness and the cognitive part in some, perhaps you call it strange, in some strange emotional way, I was enamored with Einstein s general relativity, the idea of curved space and time.
2
SPEAKER_00
Before I really knew what it meant, it just spoke to me.
2
SPEAKER_00
I don t know how else to say it.
2
SPEAKER_00
And then,
2
SPEAKER_00
When I subsequently learned that people had thought about more dimensions of space than we can see and how those extra dimensions would be vital to a deep understanding of the things that we do see in this world, four, five, six dimensions might explain why there are certain forces and particles and how they behave.
2
SPEAKER_00
To me, this was like amazing.
2
SPEAKER_00
utterly amazing.
2
SPEAKER_00
And then when I learned that string theory embraced all these ideas, embraced the general theory of relativity, embraced quantum mechanics, embraced the possibility of extra dimensions,
2
SPEAKER_00
Then I was hooked.
2
SPEAKER_00
And so when I was a graduate student, we would just spend hours.
2
SPEAKER_00
We, I mean, a couple of other graduate students and myself who had sort of worked really well together, this was at Oxford in England.
2
SPEAKER_00
We would work these enormous numbers of hours a day trying to understand the shapes of these extra dimensions, the geometry of them, what those geometrical shapes for the extra dimensions would imply for things that we see in the world around us.
2
SPEAKER_00
And it was a heady,
2
SPEAKER_00
And that kind of excitement has sort of filtered through over the decades, but I d say that s really the part of the theory that I think really hooked me most strongly.
2
SPEAKER_01
How are we supposed to think about those extra dimensions?
2
SPEAKER_01
Are we supposed to imagine actual physical reality, or is this more in the space of mathematics that allows you to sort of come up with tricks to describe the four-dimensional reality that we more directly perceive?
2
SPEAKER_00
No one really knows the answer, of course, but if I take the most straightforward approach to string theory, you really are imagining that these dimensions are there.
2
SPEAKER_00
They re real.
2
SPEAKER_00
I mean, just as you would say that the three space dimensions around us, you know, left, right, back, forth, up, down, yeah.
2
SPEAKER_00
They re real, they re here, we are immersed within those dimensions.
2
SPEAKER_00
These other dimensions are as real as these, with the one difference being their shape and their size differs from the shape and size of the dimensions that we have direct access to through human experience.
2
SPEAKER_00
And one approach imagines that these extra dimensions are tightly coiled up, curled up, crushed together, if you will, into a beautiful geometrical form that s all around us, but just too small for us to detect with our eyes, too small for us to detect even with the most powerful equipment that we have.
2
SPEAKER_00
Nevertheless, according to the mathematics, the size and the shape of those extra dimensions leaves an imprint in the world that we do have access to.
2
SPEAKER_00
So one of the ways that we have hoped yet to achieve to make contact with experimental physics is to see a signature of those extra dimensions in places like the Large Hadron Collider in Geneva, Switzerland.
2
SPEAKER_00
and it hasn t happened yet doesn t mean it won t happen but that would be a stunning moment in the history of the species if data that we acquired in these dimensions gives us kind of incontrovertible evidence that these dimensions are not the only dimensions I mean how mind-blowing
2
SPEAKER_00
would with that be in in principle all of these
2
SPEAKER_00
can work, so one of the experiments that we had high hopes for, but by high hopes, I m actually exaggerating.
2
SPEAKER_00
One of the experiments that we imagined might, in the best of all circumstances, yield some insight.
2
SPEAKER_00
We weren t, with bated breath, waiting for the result.
2
SPEAKER_00
We knew it was a long shot.
2
SPEAKER_00
When you slam protons together at very high speed of the Large Hadron Collider, if there are these extra dimensions, and if they have the right form, and that s a hypothesis that may not be correct,
2
SPEAKER_00
But when the protons collide, they can create debris, energetic debris, that can in some sense leave our dimensions and insert itself into the other dimensions.
2
SPEAKER_00
And the way you d recognize that is there d be more energy before the collision than after the collision because the debris would have taken energy away from the place where our detectors can detect it.
2
SPEAKER_00
So that s that s one real concrete way that you could find evidence for extra dimensions but yeah, since extra dimensions are of space and gravity is something that Exists within in fact is associated with the shape of space gravitational waves in principle can provide a kind of you know
2
SPEAKER_00
CAT scan of the extra dimensions if you had sufficient control over those processes.
2
SPEAKER_00
We don t yet, but perhaps one day we will.
2
SPEAKER_01
Does it make you sad a little bit?
2
SPEAKER_01
Maybe looking out into the future, you mentioned Ed Witten, that no Nobel Prizes have been given yet related to string theory.
2
SPEAKER_01
Do you think they will be?
2
SPEAKER_01
Do you think you have to have experimental validation?
2
SPEAKER_01
Or can a Nobel Prize be given?
2
SPEAKER_01
Which I don t think it s been given for quite a long time.
2
SPEAKER_01
for a purely sort of theoretical contribution.
2
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, it certainly, as a matter of historical precedent, has been the case that those who win the prize have established, investigated, illuminated a demonstrably real quality of the world.
2
SPEAKER_00
So
2
SPEAKER_00
Gravitational waves.
2
SPEAKER_00
The prize was awarded after they were detected.
2
SPEAKER_00
Not the mathematics of it, but the actual detection of it.
2
SPEAKER_00
You know, the Higgs particle.
2
SPEAKER_00
You know, it was an idea that came from the 1960s, Peter Higgs and others, in fact.
2
SPEAKER_00
And it wasn t until 2012, on July 4th, when the announcement came that this particle had been detected in the Large Hadron Collider, that people viewed it as eligible for the Nobel Prize.
2
SPEAKER_00
The idea was there, the math was there, but you needed to confirm it.
2
SPEAKER_00
Indeed, the prize ultimately was awarded.
2
SPEAKER_00
So I m not surprised.
2
SPEAKER_00
In fact, I would have been surprised if a Nobel Prize had been awarded in the arena of string theory, because it s far too speculative right now.
2
SPEAKER_00
It s far too hypothetical.
2
SPEAKER_00
In fact, I am sympathetic to the view that it really shouldn t be called string theory.
2
SPEAKER_00
It degrades the word theory, because theory in science, of course, means the best available explanation for the things that we observe in the world, the things that we measure in experiments about the world.
2
SPEAKER_00
And string theory does not do that, at least not yet.
2
SPEAKER_00
So it really should be the string hypothesis, right?
2
SPEAKER_00
We re at an earlier stage of development.
2
SPEAKER_00
And that s not the kind of thing that Nobel Prizes should be awarded for.
2
SPEAKER_01
What do you think about the critics out there?
2
SPEAKER_01
Peter White, he s from Columbia too, I think, Sabine Havenstadter.
2
SPEAKER_01
Is that a healthy thing or should we sort of focus on sort of the optimism of these hypotheses?
2
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, it s actually a good way that you frame it because I m always somewhat repelled by
2
SPEAKER_00
views of the world that start from the negative.
2
SPEAKER_00
Try to cut down an idea.
2
SPEAKER_00
Try to say that s the wrong way of thinking about things and so on.
2
SPEAKER_00
I m much more drawn, maybe because I m an optimist, I don t know.
2
SPEAKER_00
I m much more drawn to those who go out into the world with new ideas.
2
SPEAKER_00
And don t try to cut down one idea, but rather present another one that might be better.
2
SPEAKER_00
And so you make the first idea, maybe strengthy, irrelevant because you ve come up with the better approach to the world.
2
SPEAKER_00
So do I think it s healthy?
2
SPEAKER_00
Look, I think having a wide range of views and perspectives is generally a healthy thing.
2
SPEAKER_00
I think it s good to have arguments within a subject in order that you stay fresh and you stay focused on the things that matter.
2
SPEAKER_00
But in the end of the day, I think it s a more vital contribution to give us something new rather than to criticize something that s there.
2
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, I m totally with you.
2
SPEAKER_01
But it could be just the nature of being an optimist and also just the,
2
SPEAKER_01
A love of engineering.
2
SPEAKER_01
It helps nobody by criticizing the rocket that somebody else built.
2
SPEAKER_01
Just build a bigger, cheaper, better rocket.
2
SPEAKER_01
Exactly.
2
SPEAKER_01
And that seems to be how human civilization can progress effectively.
2
SPEAKER_01
We ve mentioned the second law of thermodynamics.
2
SPEAKER_01
I gotta ask you about time.
2
SPEAKER_01
And do you think of time as emergent or fundamental to our universe?
2
SPEAKER_00
I like to think of it as emergent.
2
SPEAKER_00
I don t have a solid reason for that perspective.
2
SPEAKER_00
I have a lot of hints of reasons that some of which come out of string theory and quantum gravity that perhaps would be worth talking about.
2
SPEAKER_00
But what I would say is
2
SPEAKER_00
Time is the most familiar quality of experience because there s nothing that takes place that doesn t take place within an interval of time and yet at the same time, it is perhaps the most mysterious quality of the world.
2
SPEAKER_00
So it s a wonderful confluence of the familiar and the deeply mysterious all in one little package.
2
SPEAKER_00
If you were to ask me what is time,
2
SPEAKER_00
I don t really know.
2
SPEAKER_00
I don t think anybody does.
2
SPEAKER_00
I can say what time gives us.
2
SPEAKER_00
It allows us the language for talking about change.
2
SPEAKER_00
It allows us to envision the events of the universe being spread out in this temporal timeline and in that way
2
SPEAKER_00
allows us to see the patterns that unfold within time.
2
SPEAKER_00
I mean, time allows us the structure and the organization to think about things in that kind of a progression.
2
SPEAKER_00
But what actually is it?
2
SPEAKER_00
I don t really know, and that s so strange because we can measure it, right?
2
SPEAKER_00
I mean, there are laboratories in the world that measure this thing called time to spectacular precision.
2
SPEAKER_00
But if you go up to the folks and say, what is it that you re actually measuring?
2
SPEAKER_00
I don t know that they can really articulate the kind of answer that you would expect
2
SPEAKER_00
from those who are engineering a device that can measure something called time to that level of precision.
2
SPEAKER_00
So it s a very curious combination.
2
SPEAKER_01
What do you make of the one-way feeling of causality?
2
SPEAKER_01
Like is causality...
2
SPEAKER_01
a thing or is that too just a human story that we put on top of this emergent phenomena of time?
2
SPEAKER_00
I don t know.
2
SPEAKER_00
I can give you my guess and my intuition about it.
2
SPEAKER_00
I do think that at the macroscopic level, if we re talking about sort of the human experience of time, I do think at the macroscopic level there is a fundamental notion of causality that does emerge
2
SPEAKER_00
from a starting point that may not have causality built in.
2
SPEAKER_00
So I certainly would allow that at the deepest description of reality, when we finally have that on the table, we may not see causality directly at that fundamental level.
2
SPEAKER_00
But I do believe that we will understand how to go from that fundamental level to a world where at the macroscopic level, there is this notion of A causes B.
2
SPEAKER_00
a notion that Einstein deeply embraced in his special theory of relativity where he showed that time has qualities that we wouldn t expect based on experience.
2
SPEAKER_00
You and I, if we move relative to each other, our clocks tick off time at different rate and our clocks
2
SPEAKER_00
Just a means of measuring this thing called time So this is really time that we re talking about time for you and time for me are different if we re in relative motion He then shows in the general theory of relativity that if we re experiencing different gravity different gravitational fields are actually more precisely different gravitational potentials Time will elapse for us at different rates.
2
SPEAKER_00
These are things that are
2
SPEAKER_00
astoundingly strange that give rise to a scientific notion of time travel.
2
SPEAKER_00
So this is how far Einstein took us in wiping away the old understanding of time and injecting a new understanding of its qualities.
2
SPEAKER_00
So there s so much about time that s counterintuitive,
2
SPEAKER_00
But I do not think that we re ever going to wipe away causality at the macroscopic level.
2
SPEAKER_01
There s so many interesting things at the macroscopic level that may only exist at the macroscopic level.
2
SPEAKER_01
We already talked about consciousness, that very well could be one of the things.
2
SPEAKER_01
You mentioned time travel.
2
SPEAKER_01
I mean, according to Einstein, and in general, what types of travel do you think our physical universe allows?
2
SPEAKER_00
Well, it certainly allows time travel to the future.
2
SPEAKER_00
And I m not talking about the silly thing that you and I are now going into the future second by second by second.
2
SPEAKER_00
I m talking about really the version that you see in Hollywood, at least in terms of its net effect, whereby an individual
2
SPEAKER_00
can follow an Einsteinian strategy and propel themselves into the future in some sense more quickly.
2
SPEAKER_00
So if I wanted to see what s happening on planet Earth one million years from now,
2
SPEAKER_00
Einstein tells me how to get one million years from now, build a ship, I gotta turn to guys who know how to build stuff, I can t do it like you, build a ship that can go out into the universe near the speed of light, turn around and come back, let s say it s a six month journey out and a six month journey back, and Einstein tells me how fast I need to travel, how close to the speed of light I need to go so that when I step out of my ship,
2
SPEAKER_00
It will now be one million years into the future on planet Earth.
2
SPEAKER_00
And this is not a controversial statement, right?
2
SPEAKER_00
This is not something where there s differences of opinion in the scientific community.
2
SPEAKER_00
Any scientist who knows anything about what Einstein taught us agrees with what I just said.
2
SPEAKER_00
It s commonplace, it s bread and butter physics.
2
SPEAKER_00
And so that kind of travel to the future is absolutely allowed by the laws of physics.
2
SPEAKER_00
There are engineering challenges,
2
SPEAKER_00
technological challenges.
2
SPEAKER_00
Closer to the speed of light part, yeah.
2
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, and there are even biological challenges, right?
2
SPEAKER_00
There are g-forces that you re going to experience, you know, so there s all sorts of stuff embedded in this, but those I will call the details, and those details
2
SPEAKER_00
notwithstanding, the universe allows this kind of travel to the future.
2
SPEAKER_01
And if I could pause real quick, you could also, at the macro level, with biology extend the human lifespan to do a kind of
2
SPEAKER_01
travel forward in time.
2
SPEAKER_01
If you expand how long we live, that s a way to, from a perspective of a conscious observer that is a human being, you re essentially traveling forward in time by allowing yourself to live long enough to see the thing.
2
SPEAKER_01
So that s in the space of biology.
2
SPEAKER_01
What about traveling back in time?
2
SPEAKER_00
That is a natural next question, especially if you re going on one of these journeys.
2
SPEAKER_00
Is it a one-way journey, or can you come back?
2
SPEAKER_00
And the physics community doesn t speak with a unified voice on this as yet, but I would say that the dominant perspective is that you cannot get back.
2
SPEAKER_00
Now, having said that, there are proposals that serious people have written papers on regarding hypothetical ways in which you could travel to the past.
2
SPEAKER_00
And we ve seen some of these.
2
SPEAKER_00
Again, Hollywood loves to take the most sexy ideas of physics and build narratives around them.
2
SPEAKER_00
This idea of a wormhole, like Jodie Foster in Contact went through a wormhole.
2
SPEAKER_00
Deep Space Nine star.
2
SPEAKER_00
I m sure there are many other examples where these ideas that I ve probably never even seen.
2
SPEAKER_00
But with wormholes, there s at least a proposal of how you could take a wormhole tunnel through space time, manipulate the openings of the wormhole in such a way that the openings are no longer synchronous.
2
SPEAKER_00
They are out of sync relative to each other, which would mean one s ahead and one s behind, which means if you go through one direction, you travel to the future.
2
SPEAKER_00
If you go back, you travel to the past.
2
SPEAKER_00
Now,
2
SPEAKER_00
We don t know if there are wormholes in the world.
2
SPEAKER_00
But they re possible according to Einstein, correct?
2
SPEAKER_00
They are possible according to Einstein, but even Einstein was very quick to say, just because my math allows for something doesn t mean it s real.
2
SPEAKER_00
He famously didn t even believe in black holes.
2
SPEAKER_00
Didn t believe in the Big Bang, right?
2
SPEAKER_00
And yet the black hole issue is really
3
SPEAKER_01
been settled now.
3
SPEAKER_01
We have radio telescopic photographs of the black hole in M87.
3
SPEAKER_01
It was in newspapers around the world just a couple of years ago.
3
SPEAKER_01
So it s just to say that just because it s in Einstein s math, it doesn t mean it s real.
3
SPEAKER_01
But yes, it is the case that wormholes are allowed by Einstein s equations and in principle
3
SPEAKER_01
You can imagine, you know, putting electric charges on the openings of the wormhole, allowing you to tow them around in a manner that could yield this temporal asymmetry between them.
3
SPEAKER_01
Maybe you tow one of the mouths to the edge of a black hole.
3
SPEAKER_01
In principle, you can do this, slowing down the passage of time near that black hole.
3
SPEAKER_01
And then when you bring it back, it will be well out of sync with the other opening and therefore could be
3
SPEAKER_01
a significant temporal gap between one and the other.
3
SPEAKER_01
But people who study this in more detail question, could you ever keep a wormhole open, assuming it does exist?
3
SPEAKER_01
Could you ever travel through a wormhole?
3
SPEAKER_01
Or would there be a requirement of some kind of exotic matter to prop it open that perhaps doesn t exist?
3
SPEAKER_01
So there are many, many issues that people have raised.
3
SPEAKER_01
And I would say that the general sentiment is that it s unlikely.
3
SPEAKER_01
that this kind of scenario is going to survive our deeper understanding of physics when we finally have it.
3
SPEAKER_01
But that doesn t mean that the door is closed.
3
SPEAKER_01
So maybe there s a small possibility that this could one day be realized.
3
SPEAKER_00
That s such an interesting way to put it.
3
SPEAKER_00
This kind of scenario will not survive deep understanding of physics.
3
SPEAKER_00
It s an interesting way to put it because
3
SPEAKER_00
it makes you wonder what kind of scenarios will be created by our deeper understanding of physics.
3
SPEAKER_00
Maybe, sorry to go crazy for a second, but if you have like the panpsychism idea that consciousness permeates all matter, maybe traveling in that, whatever laws of physics the consciousness operates under or something like that, in that view of the universe, if we somehow are able to understand that part, maybe traveling is super easy.
3
SPEAKER_00
It does not follow the constraints of the speed of light, something like this.
3
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, so look, I have a definite degree of sympathy with the possibility that consciousness might be more than what we described earlier as just the byproduct of mindless particles.
3
SPEAKER_01
You just made the rock happy.
3
SPEAKER_01
Exactly, you know, so,
3
SPEAKER_01
It isn t the approach that feels to me the most likely, but I see the logic.
3
SPEAKER_01
If you ve got the puzzle, how do mindless particles build mind, one resolution might be the particles are not mindless.
3
SPEAKER_01
The particles have some kind of proto-conscious quality.
3
SPEAKER_01
So there s something appealing about that straightforward solution to the puzzle.
3
SPEAKER_01
And if that s the case, if we do live in a panpsychist world where there is a degree of consciousness residing in everything in the world around us, then yes, I do think some interesting possibilities might emerge where maybe there s a way of communing
3
SPEAKER_01
with physical reality in a deeper way than we have so far.
3
SPEAKER_01
I mean, we as human beings, a vital part of our existence is human to human communication, contact.
3
SPEAKER_01
We live in social groups and that s what has allowed us to get to the place where we ve gotten.
3
SPEAKER_01
Imagine that we have long missed
3
SPEAKER_01
that there s other consciousness out there and some kind of relationship or communion with that larger conscious possibility would take us to a different place.
3
SPEAKER_01
Now, do I buy into this yet?
3
SPEAKER_01
I don t.
3
SPEAKER_01
I don t see any evidence for it.
3
SPEAKER_01
But do I have an open mind and allow for the possibility in the future?
3
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, I do.
3
SPEAKER_00
So if that s not the case and you have these simple particles that at the macro level emerges some interesting stuff like consciousness, another thing you write about in the Until the End of Time book is the thing that it seems to emerge at the macro level is the feeling like there s a free will, like we decide to do stuff.
3
SPEAKER_00
And you have a really interesting take here which is
3
SPEAKER_00
No, there s not a free will.
3
SPEAKER_00
I m just gonna speak for you and then you can correct me.
3
SPEAKER_00
No, there s not a free will, but there is an experience of freedom.
3
SPEAKER_00
Which I really love.
3
SPEAKER_00
So where does the experience, where does freedom come from if we don t have any kind of physics-based free will?
3
SPEAKER_01
So the idea follows naturally from all that we ve been talking about.
3
SPEAKER_01
Let s make the assumption.
3
SPEAKER_01
that all there is in the physical universe is stuff governed by laws.
3
SPEAKER_01
We may not have those laws, we may not know what the fundamental stuff is yet, but everything we know in science points in the direction that it s physical stuff governed by universal laws.
3
SPEAKER_01
That being the case, or that being the assumption, then you come to a particular collection of those ingredients called the human being, and that human being has particles that are fully governed by physical law.
3
SPEAKER_01
And when you then recognize that every thought that we have, every action that we undertake, is just the motion of particles,
3
SPEAKER_01
When I m thinking thoughts right now, of course, at this level of description, it is the motion of particles cascading down various neurons inside of my head and so on.
3
SPEAKER_01
And every single one of those motions, collectively and individually, is fully governed by these laws that we perhaps don t have yet, but we imagine one day we will.
3
SPEAKER_01
That leaves no opportunity
3
SPEAKER_01
for any kind of freedom to break free from the constraint of physical law.
3
SPEAKER_01
And that is the end of the story.
3
SPEAKER_01
So the traditional intuitive notion of free will, that we re the ultimate authors of our actions, that we were the buck stops, that there is no antecedent, that is the cause for our decided to go left or right, choose vanilla or chocolate, live or die.
3
SPEAKER_01
That intuitive sensation does not
3
SPEAKER_01
have a basis in our understanding of the physical world.
3
SPEAKER_01
So that s the end of the free will of the traditional sort.
3
SPEAKER_01
But then your question is, what about this other kind of freedom I talk about?
3
SPEAKER_01
And the other kind of freedom, if you focus on it intently, I think is actually the true version of freedom that we feel.
3
SPEAKER_01
And that freedom is this.
3
SPEAKER_01
You look at inanimate objects in the world, rocks, bottles of water, whatever, they have a very limited behavioral repertoire.
3
SPEAKER_01
Why?
3
SPEAKER_01
Their internal organization is too coarse for them to do very much, right?
3
SPEAKER_01
You try to have a conversation with a glass of water, you send sound waves, it doesn t do much.
3
SPEAKER_01
It may vibrate a little bit, but the repertoire of responses are incredibly limited.
3
SPEAKER_01
The difference between us and a rock or a bottle of water is that our inner organization, by virtue of eons of evolution by natural selection, is so refined, so spectacularly ordered, that we have a huge repertoire of behaviors.
3
SPEAKER_01
that are finally attuned to stimuli from the external world.
3
SPEAKER_01
You ask me a question, that s a stimulus, and all of a sudden these particle processes go into action and this is the result, this answer that I m giving you.
3
SPEAKER_01
So the freedom that we have
3
SPEAKER_01
is not from the control of physical law.
3
SPEAKER_01
The freedom that we have is from the constrained behavior that has long since governed inanimate objects.
3
SPEAKER_01
We are liberated from the limited behavioral repertoire of rocks and bottles of water to have this broad spectrum of responses.
3
SPEAKER_01
Do we pick them?
3
SPEAKER_01
We do not.
3
SPEAKER_01
Do we freely choose them?
3
SPEAKER_01
We do not.
3
SPEAKER_01
but yet we have them and we can marvel at those behaviors and that s the freedom that we have.
3
SPEAKER_00
The complexity and the breadth of that repertoire is where the freedom emerges.
3
SPEAKER_00
Is there something to be said about emergence?
3
SPEAKER_00
I don t know if you know or have looked at much about objects that
3
SPEAKER_00
I seem to love way more than anyone else, which is Sally or Tom.
3
SPEAKER_00
Like game of life type of stuff.
3
SPEAKER_00
From simple things emerges beautiful complexity.
3
SPEAKER_00
And so that s that repertoire.
3
SPEAKER_00
It s like, it seems if you have enough stuff, just beautiful complexity emerges that sure as heck to our human eyes looks,
3
SPEAKER_00
Like there s consciousness there, there s free will, there s little objects moving about and making decisions.
3
SPEAKER_00
I mean, all of that.
3
SPEAKER_00
You could say it s anthropomorphization, but...
3
SPEAKER_00
it sure as heck feels like they re organisms making decisions.
3
SPEAKER_00
What is that emergence thing?
3
SPEAKER_00
Is that within the realm of physics to understand?
3
SPEAKER_00
Is it within the realm of poetry?
3
SPEAKER_00
What is that complex systems emergence?
3
SPEAKER_00
Will that ever be understood by science?
3
SPEAKER_00
So here s the way that I think about it.
3
SPEAKER_01
So there are,
3
SPEAKER_01
clearly qualities of the world that emerge on macroscopic scales.
3
SPEAKER_01
Our sense of beauty, wonder, consciousness, all these kinds of qualities.
3
SPEAKER_01
Do I feel that they ultimately are explainable from the laws of physics?
3
SPEAKER_01
I do.
3
SPEAKER_01
There is nothing that s not ultimately explainable with the laws of physics from this physicalist perspective, which is what I take.
3
SPEAKER_01
So you got the particles, you got the laws, and you have things that emerge from the choreographed motions of those particles.
3
SPEAKER_01
But is that the best language for talking about these emergent qualities?
3
SPEAKER_01
Usually not.
3
SPEAKER_01
If I was to take something even more mundane, like a baseball flying through the air, if I was to describe it in terms of the quarks and the electrons, I d give you this mountain of data with, you know, 10 to the 28 particles and all of their coordinates and spaces as a function of time.
3
SPEAKER_01
I hand you this mountain of data, you re like, I don t know what this is.
3
SPEAKER_01
And then if you really were clever and looking, oh, it s a baseball just described in the least economical way possible.
3
SPEAKER_01
It is much more useful and insightful to talk about the baseball flying through the air.
3
SPEAKER_01
Similarly, there are things at the macroscopic level like human experience and human emotion and human action and the sensation of free will that we undeniably all have, even if it itself doesn t have a basis
3
SPEAKER_01
in our understanding of the physical world, it s useful to talk about things in this very human language.
3
SPEAKER_01
And so, yes, it s vital to talk about things in the poetic language of human experience, but do not lose sight of the fact, and some people do, they say, oh, it s just an emergent phenomenon.
3
SPEAKER_01
Don t lose sight of the fact that emergent phenomena are emerging from this deeper understanding that comes from the reductionist account of physical law.
3
SPEAKER_01
And there s a lot of insight to come from that, such as,
3
SPEAKER_01
the freedom that you thought that you had, the freedom of will that you thought you had, it doesn t have a basis in that reductionist account, so it s not real.
3
SPEAKER_00
So speaking of the poetry of human experience, you mentioned the images of the black holes.
3
SPEAKER_00
How did it make you feel a few years ago when that first image came out?
3
SPEAKER_01
Truly amazing, a sense of, well, I guess the feeling was,
3
SPEAKER_01
Both amazing and there was a little sense of, jealousy is not quite the right word, but a sense of longing.
3
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, I think that s a better word because here s a subject that started with Einstein back in 1915, writes down the equations of the general theory of relativity.
3
SPEAKER_01
And then there are,
3
SPEAKER_01
scores of individuals over the decades, you know, starting with people like Carl Schwarzschild, who analyzed the equation, see the possibility of black holes.
3
SPEAKER_01
People develop these ideas.
3
SPEAKER_01
John Wheeler, all these greats of physics.
3
SPEAKER_01
It s still a hypothetical subject.
3
SPEAKER_01
It gets closer to reality through observations of the center of our galaxy, stars whipping around in a manner that could only really be explained by there being a black hole in the center of our galaxy, but it was still indirect.
3
SPEAKER_01
To actually have a direct image
3
SPEAKER_01
that you can look at.
3
SPEAKER_01
What a beautiful arc, narrative arc from the theoretical to the absolutely established.
3
SPEAKER_01
And that s what we hope will happen with other areas, for instance, string theory, right?
3
SPEAKER_01
I mean, holy mathematical subject at the outset and still pretty much a holy mathematical subject today.
3
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, do we long?
3
SPEAKER_01
for that image where we can look at it and say, string, it s real.
3
SPEAKER_01
I mean, how thrilling, how thrilling to be part of that journey, to be part of that step that moves things from the abstract to the concrete.
3
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, so like the image of the DNA, the early images of the DNA, for example.
3
SPEAKER_00
But there is something, especially, so the problem with strings is they re tiny, so it s harder to take a picture.
3
SPEAKER_00
In the following sense, when you think of a black hole, I mean, you have a swirl of, I guess, what is, I don t even know, it s dust, whatever, light.
3
SPEAKER_00
Accreting onto the event horizon.
3
SPEAKER_00
And then there s darkness in the center.
3
SPEAKER_00
So that picture in particular, I guess, is of a gigantic black hole.
3
SPEAKER_00
I mean, it s terrifying.
3
SPEAKER_00
Billions of times the mass of the sun.
3
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, so it s both exciting and terrifying.
3
SPEAKER_00
I mean, I don t know where you fall on the spectrum.
3
SPEAKER_00
It s exciting at first, like the longer I think about it, every time I think about it, the more terrifying it becomes.
3
SPEAKER_00
So it always starts exciting and then it goes to terrifying.
3
SPEAKER_00
And both are feelings, very human feelings that I appreciate.
3
SPEAKER_00
It s like terrified awe somehow is still beautiful.
3
SPEAKER_01
It s a good way of saying it.
3
SPEAKER_01
I think I kind of share that reaction because there is a way in which
3
SPEAKER_01
when you work on this subject, like all the time, I teach it, I teach about black holes, write the equations on the blackboard.
3
SPEAKER_01
The ideas reside in a very cognitive, I don t know, mathematical portion of the brain, or at least for me.
3
SPEAKER_01
And it s only when you like sit down and it s quiet and you start to contemplate, wait, wait, wait, wait, this isn t just like a mathematical game.
3
SPEAKER_01
there are these monsters out there.
3
SPEAKER_01
Now I don t, not in a sense of I fear for my life, but it s a sense of how extraordinary is this universe.
3
SPEAKER_01
And so it is breathtaking.
3
SPEAKER_01
How powerful nature is.
3
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, how stupendously powerful nature is.
3
SPEAKER_01
And so there is a deep sense of humility that I think this instills if you really allow the ideas to sink in.
3
SPEAKER_00
Well, I have to ask about the most stupendously powerful thing to have ever happened in our universe, which is the Big Bang.
3
SPEAKER_00
What s up with the Big Bang?
3
SPEAKER_00
So we can, I mean, with gravitation waves, the hope is when you have more and more accurate measurements of the gravitation waves, you can crawl back further and further back in time towards the Big Bang.
3
SPEAKER_00
Do you have a hope that we ll be able to understand the early spark that created our universe?
3
SPEAKER_01
You know, that and the deep interior of a black hole are, I think, the biggest mysteries that we hope the melding of quantum mechanics and gravity will reveal, will illuminate.
3
SPEAKER_01
And, you know, what question could be
3
SPEAKER_01
more captivating than why is there something rather than nothing, right?
3
SPEAKER_01
Why is there a universe at all?
3
SPEAKER_01
And will the theories that we re developing take us to an answer to that?
3
SPEAKER_01
I don t know.
3
SPEAKER_01
Even if we truly knew what the Big Bang is, and that s a big question in its own right, one would still be left with the question, well, okay, so you ve explained the process by which a tiny nugget of a universe, a tiny nugget of space-time,
3
SPEAKER_01
can undergo some kind of growth to yield the world around us, but presumably in that explanation, you re gonna involve mathematics and some ingredients like quantum fields or matter or energy or something.
3
SPEAKER_01
Where did that stuff come from?
3
SPEAKER_01
Can we get to that level of explanation?
3
SPEAKER_01
I don t know, but it is remarkable that if you ask what happened a millionth of a second after the Big Bang,
3
SPEAKER_01
It s not really that controversial any longer, right?
3
SPEAKER_01
Even though there s a lot of argument in the field, and it s very heated right now, I should say, regarding what is the right theory of the Big Bang, what is the right theory of early universe cosmology, where I mean early, much earlier than a millionth of a second, a lot of dissent, a lot of
3
SPEAKER_01
heated arguments about that.
3
SPEAKER_01
No pun intended.
3
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, right, exactly.
3
SPEAKER_01
But you go like a millionth of a second after that and we re on pretty firm ground.
3
SPEAKER_01
Isn t that amazing, right?
3
SPEAKER_01
To understand what happened from that point forward.
3
SPEAKER_01
But to go back is controversial.
3
SPEAKER_01
So there is this theory called inflationary cosmology.
3
SPEAKER_01
which I would say has been the dominant paradigm since early 1980s.
3
SPEAKER_01
So what does that mean?
3
SPEAKER_01
Roughly 40 years now, it s been the dominant cosmological paradigm.
3
SPEAKER_01
And it makes use of a curious feature of Einstein s general theory of relativity, his theory of gravity, where Einstein shows us mathematically that gravity can not only be attractive, you know, the kind of gravity that we re used to, things pulled together, but it can also be repulsive.
3
SPEAKER_01
And that fact is then leveraged by people like Alan Guth and Andre Linde and at the time Paul Steinhardt and Andreas Hallbrecht and others to say, okay, if we had a little nugget in the early universe which was filled with the stuff that yields this repulsive gravity, well, that would have blown everything apart.
3
SPEAKER_01
It would cause everything to swell.
3
SPEAKER_01
Beautiful explanation.
4
SPEAKER_01
for what the bang in the Big Bang was.
4
SPEAKER_01
And then people mathematically analyzed the consequences of this idea, and they make predictions for tiny temperature differences across the night sky that in principle could be measured.
4
SPEAKER_01
You send up balloons, you send up satellites with very refined thermometers, and they measured the temperature of the night sky, and the statistical distribution of the temperature differences agrees with the mathematical predictions.
4
SPEAKER_01
I mean, you just sort of have to stand in awe of this insight.
4
SPEAKER_01
So you think, aha, the theory has been established.
4
SPEAKER_01
But scientists are an incredibly skeptical bunch.
4
SPEAKER_01
And some scientists, including one of the people who helped develop the theory at the outset, Paul Steinhardt, comes along and says, well, yeah, this theory s done pretty well so far, but there are aspects of this theory
4
SPEAKER_01
that are making me lose confidence.
4
SPEAKER_01
For instance, this theory seems to suggest that there might be other universes.
4
SPEAKER_01
Like, how do you make sense of a theory that suggests there are other universes?
4
SPEAKER_01
Or there are others who come along and say this theory seems to talk about length scales that are minuscule even by the so-called Planck length, the sort of shortest length that we can imagine making sense of in a theory of quantum gravity.
4
SPEAKER_01
How do you make sense of that?
4
SPEAKER_01
And so on and so forth.
4
SPEAKER_01
They develop a list of things that they consider to be chinks in the inflationary cosmological theory s armor.
4
SPEAKER_01
And they develop other ideas which they claim yield the same predictions as inflationary cosmology for those temperature differences across space, but don t suffer from these problems.
4
SPEAKER_01
And then the inflationary cosmology folks say, no, no, no, hang on.
4
SPEAKER_01
Your theory suffers from different problems.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so the arguments goes, it s a healthy debate.
4
SPEAKER_01
Talk about real debates in science.
4
SPEAKER_01
So when you ask what s up with the Big Bang, I don t know right now.
4
SPEAKER_01
If you would have asked me five years ago, maybe even less than that, three or four years ago, I would have said, look, inflationary cosmology has some issues, but the package of explanations it provides is so potent,
4
SPEAKER_01
and the issues that beset it are seemingly solvable to me, that I would imagine it s going to, in the end, win out.
4
SPEAKER_01
I would still say that today, but I wouldn t say it as loudly.
4
SPEAKER_01
I wouldn t say it as confidently.
4
SPEAKER_01
I think it s worth thinking about alternate ideas, and it could be the case that the paradigm at some point shifts.
4
SPEAKER_00
Does dark matter and dark energy fit into the shifting of the explanations for those?
4
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, certainly.
4
SPEAKER_01
So dark energy has, in the inflationary theory, is kind of a big mystery.
4
SPEAKER_01
So dark energy is the observational realization in the last 20 years that not only is the universe expanding, it s expanding ever more quickly.
4
SPEAKER_01
something is still pushing things outward.
4
SPEAKER_01
And the explanation is that there s like a residual version of the repulsive gravity from the early universe, but it s such a strange number.
4
SPEAKER_01
When you write that amount of dark energy using the relevant units in the theory of quantum gravity, it s a decimal point followed by like 120 zeros and then a one.
4
SPEAKER_01
We re not used to those kinds of numbers in physics.
4
SPEAKER_01
We re used to a half,
4
SPEAKER_01
1, pi, e, square root of 2.
4
SPEAKER_01
Those are the kinds of fundamental numbers that emerge in our explanations of the world.
4
SPEAKER_01
And we look at this bizarre number, decimal point, all these zeros and a 1, we say,
4
SPEAKER_01
Something s wrong there.
4
SPEAKER_01
Like where would that number have come from?
4
SPEAKER_01
Now there are people who suggest resolution to it, so it s not like we re totally in the dark on it, but those people like Paul Steinhardt, who have alternate cosmological theories, cyclic cosmologies as they call it, claim
4
SPEAKER_01
that they have a more natural explanation of the dark energy, that it naturally feeds into a cyclical process that is their cosmological paradigm.
4
SPEAKER_01
So yeah, if the cosmology should change, it s conceivable our view of dark energy may change from deeply mysterious to deeply integrated into a different paradigm.
4
SPEAKER_01
That is possible.
4
SPEAKER_00
I think it s Roger Penrose that think that information can bleed through from before the Big Bang to after the Big Bang.
4
SPEAKER_00
Is the Big Bang like a full erasure of the hard drive or is there some information that could bleed through?
4
SPEAKER_01
is among the most creative thinkers of the last hundred years, rightly won the Nobel Prize for his insights into singularities in space-time that we know to afflict our mathematical solutions of black holes and the Big Bang and so forth.
4
SPEAKER_01
he has an enormously fertile imagination.
4
SPEAKER_01
And I mean that in the most positive sense.
4
SPEAKER_01
So he has put forward this idea, this conformal cyclic cosmology, I think is the official title, although I could be getting that wrong.
4
SPEAKER_01
I can t say that I ve studied it.
4
SPEAKER_01
I have seen lectures on it.
4
SPEAKER_01
I don t find it convincing as yet.
4
SPEAKER_01
It feels like it s being built
4
SPEAKER_01
to find a solution as opposed to sort of more naturally emerging.
4
SPEAKER_01
Maybe Roger would say otherwise, and I don t mean to in any way cast aspersions on the work.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s vital and interesting, and people are thinking about it.
4
SPEAKER_01
I don t consider it as close a competitor to, say, the inflationary theory as, for instance, the stuff that Paul Steinhardt has put forward.
4
SPEAKER_01
But again, you ve got to keep an open mind in this business when there s so much that we don t yet understand.
4
SPEAKER_00
I mean, it is wild to think that information could survive something like that.
4
SPEAKER_00
It is wild to imagine that information could escape a black hole, for example.
4
SPEAKER_00
It just seems like by construction, these things are supposed to not bleed out anything.
4
SPEAKER_01
One of the challenges in all these theories is when we talk about a singularity, has this really sexy term, the singularity, but a singularity is in more ordinary language.
4
SPEAKER_01
Okay, a physical system where the mathematics breaks down.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s nonsensical.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s like taking one divided by zero, you put that into a calculator and it says E error, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
It does not make sense, doesn t compute.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so it s very hard.
4
SPEAKER_01
to make definitive statements about things like the Big Bang or about black holes until we cure the mathematical singularities.
4
SPEAKER_01
And there are some who claim that in certain regimes, the singularities have been cured.
4
SPEAKER_01
I don t, by any mean, think that there s consensus on these ideas.
4
SPEAKER_01
So when one talks about information sort of bleeding through the Big Bang, you ve really got to make sure that the equations have no singularity.
4
SPEAKER_01
You talk about cyclic cosmology, you ve got to make sure that the equations don t have any singularities as you go from, say, one cycle to the next.
4
SPEAKER_01
Now, some of the proponents of these theories claim that they have resolved these issues.
4
SPEAKER_01
I don t think that there s a general sense that that is the case as yet, but it could be that, look, life is so short that I haven t had the time to deeply delve into all the mathematical intricacies of all the ideas that have been put forward.
4
SPEAKER_01
If I did that, I d never do anything else.
4
SPEAKER_01
But that s what the issue is.
4
SPEAKER_00
And of course, it s just math.
4
SPEAKER_00
There may be holes.
4
SPEAKER_00
that there may be gaps in our understanding in the way we re modeling physical reality.
4
SPEAKER_01
Well, that s the point.
4
SPEAKER_01
In fact, when you said I was about to jump in and say modeling, but you got there first, and it s exactly the right point.
4
SPEAKER_01
We re talking about the universe here, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
And how do you talk about the universe with a straight face mathematically?
4
SPEAKER_01
And the way you do it is you simplify, you throw away those characteristics of the universe that you don t think are vital to a full understanding.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so we re gonna get to a point, and people are starting to, where we ve gotta go beyond those simplifications.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so cosmology has for a long time modeled the universe in the most simplest terms, homogeneous, isotropic.
4
SPEAKER_01
It has just a few parameters that describe it, the average density of mass and energy and so forth.
4
SPEAKER_01
We have to go beyond those simplifications and that will require
4
SPEAKER_01
putting these things on computers, we re not going to be able to do calculations there.
4
SPEAKER_01
So much as astrophysics has gone beyond many simplifications to now give really detailed simulations of star systems and galaxies and so forth, we re going to have to do that with cosmology and people are starting to do that today.
4
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, I ve seen some interesting work on simulation.
4
SPEAKER_00
Most simulation cosmology, by the way, is just awesome.
4
SPEAKER_00
But, you know, just like simulation of the early formation of our solar system to understand how the, like the Oort cloud and just, I don t know, the whole of it, how Earth came to be.
4
SPEAKER_00
Like how Jupiter just protects us.
4
SPEAKER_00
And then there s like weird, like,
4
SPEAKER_00
moons and volcanoes and modeling all of that, the formation of all of that is fascinating.
4
SPEAKER_00
Because that naturally is the question of how does life emerge on these kinds of rocks?
4
SPEAKER_00
How does a rock become a rabbit?
4
SPEAKER_00
But speaking of models, there s an equation called the Drake equation.
4
SPEAKER_00
We were talking about life.
4
SPEAKER_00
I have to ask, at the highest level first, when you look out there, how many alien civilizations do you think are out there?
4
SPEAKER_01
Zero, one, or many?
4
SPEAKER_01
So if you say civilization, I would bring my number way down.
4
SPEAKER_01
It could be zero.
4
SPEAKER_01
If you talk about life, I think it could be many.
4
SPEAKER_01
As we were saying before, I think the move from life to consciousness, the kinds of beings that would build what we would recognize as a civilization, that may be extraordinarily rare.
4
SPEAKER_01
I hope it s not.
4
SPEAKER_01
You know, as a kid, I loved Star Trek.
4
SPEAKER_01
I just loved the idea that we would be part of some universal community where, look,
4
SPEAKER_01
Experience on planet Earth suggests it doesn t always go so well when groups who are separated try to come together and live in some larger collective.
4
SPEAKER_01
But again, as an optimist,
4
SPEAKER_01
how amazing would it be to converse with an alien civilization and learn what they ve figured out about physics and cosmology and compare notes and learn from each other in some wonderful way.
4
SPEAKER_01
I love that idea, but if you ask me the likelihood of it, I would err on saying it may be so improbable
4
SPEAKER_01
that the conditions conspire to allow life to move to this place of consciousness, that it might be rare.
4
SPEAKER_00
It might be oversimplifying things, but just observing the power of the evolutionary process, I tend to believe, and you read different theories of how we went, how Homo sapiens evolved,
4
SPEAKER_00
It seems like the evolutionary process naturally leads to homo sapiens or creatures like that or much better than that.
4
SPEAKER_00
To me, there s several scary scenarios.
4
SPEAKER_00
Okay, the positive scenario is life itself is really difficult.
4
SPEAKER_00
So that origin of life is difficult.
4
SPEAKER_00
That s exciting for many reasons because we might be able to prove that wrong easily in the near term by finding life elsewhere.
4
SPEAKER_00
The scary thing to me is if life is easy and there s plenty of conscious, intelligent civilizations out there and we have not,
4
SPEAKER_00
obviously made contact, which means with intelligence and consciousness comes responsibility and ultimately destruction.
4
SPEAKER_00
So with power comes great responsibility.
4
SPEAKER_00
And then we end up destroying ourselves.
4
SPEAKER_00
That s the scariest.
4
SPEAKER_00
The positive, I guess, version is that
4
SPEAKER_00
maybe we re being watched.
4
SPEAKER_00
Sort of like there s a transition to where you don t want to ruin the primitive villages out there.
4
SPEAKER_00
And so there s a protective layer around us.
4
SPEAKER_00
They re watching.
4
SPEAKER_00
So where do you, in these possible explanations to the Fermi paradox, why haven t we contacted aliens?
4
SPEAKER_00
Do you land on?
4
SPEAKER_01
Well, I think the most straightforward explanation is that there aren t any.
4
SPEAKER_01
Now, there are many other explanations too, so you can t be dogmatic about things that are just sort of gut feel.
4
SPEAKER_01
But, you know, one of my favorite Twilight Zone episodes, I don t know if you ever saw this one, where this alien civilization finally comes to planet Earth and
4
SPEAKER_01
and gives us this book that they really want us to have and to hold, and it s in this foreign language, you don t understand it.
4
SPEAKER_01
The cryptographers, they desperately try to decipher it as humans are going to visit this other alien planet, and they re all sending back postcards, how wonderful it is and so forth.
4
SPEAKER_01
And they finally decipher the title, it s to serve man.
4
SPEAKER_01
and everyone s so thrilled, oh, they re here to service, it all makes sense.
4
SPEAKER_01
And then just as one of the final cryptographers is going onto the alien ship, his helper runs and says, I ve deciphered the rest of the book to serve man, it s a cookbook.
4
SPEAKER_01
So yeah, is that a possibility?
4
SPEAKER_01
Sure.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so could they be watching us and just sort of waiting for us to get to a mature enough,
4
SPEAKER_01
level, I don t know, it strikes me, well, you know, I think it d be better to have this conversation after the James Webb telescope.
4
SPEAKER_01
I mean, I do think that if we look at the atmospheres of many planets, I mean, there s now an estimate now that there s on order of
4
SPEAKER_01
One planet per star on average so we ve long known that you know the galaxy hundreds of billions of stars Numbers of galaxy hundreds of billions of galaxies that we re talking about hundreds of billions of hundreds of billions of planets You know and if we start to survey some of these planets and one after the other after the other we just sort of find no evidence for
4
SPEAKER_01
any of the biological markers.
4
SPEAKER_01
It could be, of course, maybe life takes a radically different form.
4
SPEAKER_01
It d be hard to know that.
4
SPEAKER_01
But I think that would at least give us some insight on the life question.
4
SPEAKER_01
But I just don t see how we get insight on the civilization or consciousness question without the direct connection.
4
SPEAKER_01
And it strikes me that if consciousness is ubiquitous,
4
SPEAKER_01
Let s say life is.
4
SPEAKER_01
I m willing to grant that.
4
SPEAKER_01
If consciousness is also ubiquitous, then I don t understand why they haven t been here, or why there hasn t been subconscious, because presumably, they should be much further ahead of us.
4
SPEAKER_01
How unlikely would it be that we re like,
4
SPEAKER_01
of all consciousness in the universe, we re the most advanced.
4
SPEAKER_01
That d be such a special place for human beings that it s hard for me to grant that as a likely possibility.
4
SPEAKER_01
Rather, I think we re kind of run of the mill.
4
SPEAKER_01
And there are many who are far more advanced than us.
4
SPEAKER_01
And I don t think that they would expend the energy to hide themselves.
4
SPEAKER_01
I don t think they care enough.
4
SPEAKER_00
See, that s actually what I believe, that there s a very large number of civilizations that are far more advanced than us.
4
SPEAKER_00
But my sense is that humans are exceptionally limited, both in our direct sensory capabilities and our physics, our tools of sensing, that just like with the string theory and the multiple dimensions, we re just not, like, it s like, I honestly believe there could be stuff in front of our nose that we re just not seeing.
4
SPEAKER_00
because we re too dumb, too much hubris, and I mean, there s a bunch of stuff, and too ignorant to the fabric of reality, all of those things.
4
SPEAKER_00
We re young in terms of intelligence.
4
SPEAKER_01
But I guess what I say is, like, I m on board with all of that as a real possibility, but then it does strike me that we aren t sufficiently able to observe the, look, we can look back to,
4
SPEAKER_01
you know, a fraction of the duration from here to there, just a fraction is left that we are unable to see.
4
SPEAKER_01
So however young we are, we have been able to sort of pierce the universe and it just strikes me that
4
SPEAKER_01
there would be some signature, but maybe that s coming.
4
SPEAKER_01
But look, having said that, I do, look, I certainly note the fact that it s rare that I stoop down while walking in Manhattan and sort of dig up some ants in the bushes on the side of the street and talk to the ants, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
Because it s just not interesting to me.
4
SPEAKER_01
So if we re like the ants on the cosmological landscape, then yeah, I can imagine that the super advanced aliens
4
SPEAKER_01
We d be like, who would ever?
4
SPEAKER_01
But I feel like we re sufficiently advanced that there should be some signal, signature of that, but maybe it s coming.
4
SPEAKER_00
I think the deeper fundamental problem between us and the ants is that we don t have a common language.
4
SPEAKER_00
It s not the interest.
4
SPEAKER_00
It s that we don t even have a common language.
4
SPEAKER_00
And so the alien civilizations don t even know how to communicate.
4
SPEAKER_00
Like we humans have convinced ourself we re special because we developed the language.
4
SPEAKER_00
And you talked about the importance of language to the intelligence.
4
SPEAKER_00
But it makes you wonder like how very niche is that club that we ve created.
4
SPEAKER_00
like tribe we ve created of language and linguistic type of systems that are very specific to our particular kinds of brains and we share ideas together.
4
SPEAKER_00
We re all super excited that we can understand the universe because we came up with some notation and math.
4
SPEAKER_00
I wonder if there s some totally other kinds of language that communicates on a different time scale with very different mechanisms in the space of information that just is not.
4
SPEAKER_00
Everything is lost in translation.
5
SPEAKER_00
could well be.
5
SPEAKER_00
Look, I mean, I think part of the reason I go toward the possibility of the soul intelligence is there s a certain kind of romantic appeal to looking out in the cosmos and it s just quiet and it s just eternal silence.
5
SPEAKER_00
There s some
5
SPEAKER_00
There s something that appeals to me at an emotional level that way.
5
SPEAKER_00
But yeah, I mean, nobody knows.
5
SPEAKER_00
And it s certainly conceivable that there s just a radical mismatch between the kinds of things that we are able to observe and sensitive to versus the kinds of structures that permeate the universe in a manner that simply we re unable to detect.
5
SPEAKER_01
Well, if we are alone,
5
SPEAKER_01
that is exciting, and one of the ways it s exciting is that it s up to us to become, to expand out into the universe, to permeate consciousness out into the universe.
5
SPEAKER_01
So that s where space exploration comes in.
5
SPEAKER_01
Let me ask you, as somebody who s a screen theorist, a physicist,
5
SPEAKER_01
Do you think space exploration, colonizing space is a physics or an engineering problem?
5
SPEAKER_01
What would you say?
5
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, I think it s fundamentally an engineering problem if we re not trying to do things like
5
SPEAKER_00
build wormholes the way they did, say, an interstellar to get to a different place or trying to travel near the speed of light so that we would actually be able to traverse interstellar distances.
5
SPEAKER_00
I mean, without that, our colonization will happen in a very, very slow rate, right?
5
SPEAKER_00
But one of the beauties of relativity is if you do travel near the speed of light, you can actually go arbitrarily far in a human lifetime.
5
SPEAKER_00
People say, how is that possible?
5
SPEAKER_00
You can t go billions of light years.
5
SPEAKER_00
Well, you can, actually, because as you can do the speed of light, the way in which space and time change allows you to go, in principle, arbitrarily far.
5
SPEAKER_00
That s very exciting.
5
SPEAKER_00
But if we put that physics side of the issue
5
SPEAKER_00
the manipulation of space and time to the side, yeah, I think it s a deep engineering problem.
5
SPEAKER_00
How do you terraform other planets?
5
SPEAKER_00
I mean, how do you go beyond our local neighborhood, say, without using the ideas of relativity?
5
SPEAKER_00
So I think it s all quite exciting.
5
SPEAKER_00
And I think the idea is using solar sails that people have developed and
5
SPEAKER_00
you know, trying to take that first step to Mars.
5
SPEAKER_00
I think that s a vital and valuable step to take.
5
SPEAKER_00
But yeah, I think these are fundamentally engineering challenges.
5
SPEAKER_01
Or extending the human lifespan through biology research or maybe reducing what it means to be a human being into information and uploading certain parts of it.
5
SPEAKER_01
Maybe not all the full resolution of a human life, but maybe the essential things like the DNA and be able to reconstruct that human being.
5
SPEAKER_01
But I have to ask about Mars.
5
SPEAKER_01
Do you find the dream of humans stepping on Mars, stepping foot first, but also colonizing Mars, one that s worth us fighting for?
5
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, hugely so.
5
SPEAKER_00
I mean, I think what we have long been not always in the best way is a species of explorers.
5
SPEAKER_00
in the literal sense of traveling from one part of the world to another or in the more metaphorical sense of trying to travel through our minds to the quantum realm or back to the Big Bang or to the center of black holes.
5
SPEAKER_00
So I think that s fundamentally part of the human spirit.
5
SPEAKER_00
So I do think that s a vital part of our heritage brought forward into its next incarnation.
5
SPEAKER_00
That s who we are.
5
SPEAKER_01
Do you think there ll be a day in the future where a human being is born on Mars and has to learn about his or her human origins on Earth?
5
SPEAKER_00
Like they ll have to read in the book?
5
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, I don t think it ll be a book at that stage.
5
SPEAKER_00
It ll probably just be uploaded into the head or something, or imprinted into the DNA, and then they just sort of sense it.
5
SPEAKER_00
But yeah, I think there s, well, look, the issue you raised before is the vital one.
5
SPEAKER_00
Is it the case that any sufficiently advanced civilization destroys itself?
5
SPEAKER_00
Is that sort of a commonplace quality?
5
SPEAKER_00
I mean, that s the other potential answer to the Fermi paradox.
5
SPEAKER_00
Why aren t they here?
5
SPEAKER_00
Because by the time they got to the technological development where they could travel here, they blew themselves up.
5
SPEAKER_00
They destroyed themselves.
5
SPEAKER_00
And that s an unfortunate, but not a hard to imagine possibility based on things that have happened here.
5
SPEAKER_00
planet Earth but but putting that to the side I think it you know that s the big obstacle but put it to the side we will resolve the engineering challenges and and you know I should probably modify my answer from before when you said is it engineering or physics it s really both right so so we will surmount the engineering challenges and that will then make the physics challenges relevant
5
SPEAKER_00
It ll make it relevant to figure out how to travel near the speed of light.
5
SPEAKER_00
It ll make it relevant to learn how to manipulate the shape of space-time and so forth.
5
SPEAKER_00
So I think it s a multi-stage process where it is engineering and ultimately physics, and if we stick around long enough,
5
SPEAKER_00
Those are the kinds of challenges I think that we re ultimately gonna surmount.
5
SPEAKER_01
And on the physics side, it s figuring out how to harness energy enough to travel outside the solar system, which seems like a heck of a difficult journey.
5
SPEAKER_01
But even Mars itself, I don t know, maybe because I was born in the Soviet Union and was born with the, you know, looking up at the stars and that dream of like the highest of human achievement is ability to fly out there to, you know, to join the stars.
5
SPEAKER_01
I really like the idea of going to Mars and not just stepping foot on Mars.
5
SPEAKER_01
It wasn t until...
5
SPEAKER_01
Maybe I m misinformed, but for me personally, it wasn t until Elon Musk started talking about the colonization of Mars did I realize we humans can actually do that.
5
SPEAKER_01
First of all, the importance of somebody saying that we can do these seemingly impossible things is immeasurable because
5
SPEAKER_01
The fact that he placed that into my mind and into the minds of millions of others, maybe hundreds of millions, maybe billions of others, young kids today, I mean, that s going to make it a reality.
5
SPEAKER_01
I, for some reason, am deeply excited.
5
SPEAKER_01
even though my work is in AI, that echoes all of this.
5
SPEAKER_01
I m excited by the idea that somebody would be born, as we were saying, on Mars and sort of look up and be able to see with a telescope Earth and say, that s where I came from.
5
SPEAKER_01
I don t know, that idea, scale to other planets, to other solar systems, that s really exciting.
5
SPEAKER_00
And hugely exciting.
5
SPEAKER_00
I think you re absolutely right.
5
SPEAKER_00
I mean, the vital thing
5
SPEAKER_00
It s the dream, right?
5
SPEAKER_00
I mean, and it sounds hackneyed, but it is so important for young kids for the next generation to think about the things that are seemingly impossible.
5
SPEAKER_00
I mean, that s what makes them possible.
5
SPEAKER_00
And this is one which is concrete enough.
5
SPEAKER_00
I mean, this is something that s gonna happen soon in terms of actually going to Mars.
5
SPEAKER_00
And then the next step of establishing
5
SPEAKER_00
some presence, some semi-permanent or permanent presence.
5
SPEAKER_00
This is not something that s gonna wait to the 25th century.
5
SPEAKER_00
I mean, this is something that s gonna happen relatively soon.
5
SPEAKER_00
So, I mean, it could well be in your lifetime, unlikely mine, but possibly in your lifetime that that kid will be born and have the experience that you described.
5
SPEAKER_00
So, yeah, it s spectacularly exciting.
5
SPEAKER_01
And I actually, I would love to go on Mars on one of the early.
5
SPEAKER_01
You would?
5
SPEAKER_01
Yeah.
5
SPEAKER_00
What if it s one way?
5
SPEAKER_01
I m happy doing one way.
5
SPEAKER_01
Really?
5
SPEAKER_01
Wow.
5
SPEAKER_01
And I m single if there s ladies out there that wanna start that family.
5
SPEAKER_00
Let s go out to Mars.
5
SPEAKER_00
No, I think.
5
SPEAKER_00
See, I have to tell you something.
5
SPEAKER_00
You spoke about terror, thinking about like black holes.
5
SPEAKER_00
If I actually think about going to Mars and being on Mars and put myself in there fully, that s terror inducing.
5
SPEAKER_00
the idea of to be in this foreign world where you can t come back, where you ve made this choice that can t be reversed, or at some point it may be, but in that guise, that to me carries a deep sense of terror.
5
SPEAKER_01
You know, I feel that sense of terror every time Kerouac, Jack Kerouac talked about this on the road, is when you leave a place, if you re honest about it,
5
SPEAKER_01
Like life is short, and when you leave a place, you move to a new place, and you think of all the friends, maybe family you re leaving behind as you drive over the hill, that really is goodbye.
5
SPEAKER_01
Like we sometimes don t think of it that way when we re moving, but that really is goodbye to that life, to the person you were, to all the people.
5
SPEAKER_01
Maybe if it s close friends, you ll see them maybe 10, 15 more times in your life and that s it.
5
SPEAKER_01
And you re saying goodbye to all of that.
5
SPEAKER_01
And so in the same way, I see it as way more dramatic when you re flying away from earth and it s like, it s goodbye.
5
SPEAKER_01
to Dunkin  Donuts and Starbucks and it s goodbye to whatever, I don t know why I picked those, but all the things that are special to Earth, it s goodbye, but that s life.
5
SPEAKER_01
I suppose more what excites me about that kind of journey is it s a distinct contemplation of your mortality, acceptance of your mortality, you re saying,
5
SPEAKER_01
Just like when you take on any difficult journey, it s accepting that you re going to die one day and might as well do something truly exciting.
5
SPEAKER_00
Yes.
5
SPEAKER_00
I m with you on that.
5
SPEAKER_00
I m a strong believer that
5
SPEAKER_00
deep underneath human motivation is this terror of our own mortality.
5
SPEAKER_00
There s this wonderful book that had a great influence on me called The Denial of Death by Ernest Becker.
5
SPEAKER_00
And when you are aware of the ways in which our mortality influences our behaviors, it really does add a different slant, a different kind of color to the interpretation of human behavior.
5
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, it s funny.
5
SPEAKER_01
That book had a big influence on me as well.
5
SPEAKER_01
And terror management theory.
5
SPEAKER_01
And I, again, from an engineering perspective, I don t know how many people that book influenced.
5
SPEAKER_01
because I talk to people about the fear of death and it doesn t seem to be that fundamental to their experience.
5
SPEAKER_01
And I don t think on the surface it s fundamental to my experience, but it seems like an awfully, in terms of we talk about models and strength theory and theories, in terms of theories of this macro experience of human life, it seems like a heck of a good theory that the fear of death is at the kind of, is the worm at the core.
5
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, well I mean, and the terror management theories that you make reference to, I mean,
5
SPEAKER_00
This is a group of psychologists, social psychologists who devised these very clever experiments, real-world experiments with real people.
5
SPEAKER_00
where you can directly measure the hidden influence of the recognition of our own mortality.
5
SPEAKER_00
I mean, they ve done these experiments where they have group of people A, group of people B, and the only difference between the two groups is that group B, they somehow reminded them in some subtle way of their own mortality.
5
SPEAKER_00
Sometimes it s nothing more than interviewing them with a funeral home across the street.
5
SPEAKER_00
You know, an influence is there, but it s subtle.
5
SPEAKER_00
You don t even think you d take note of.
5
SPEAKER_00
And they can find measurable effects that differentiate the two groups to a high degree of statistical significance in how they respond to certain challenges or certain kinds of questions that shows a direct influence of the reminder of their own mortality.
5
SPEAKER_00
And I ve read a number of these studies and they are
5
SPEAKER_00
Really convincing and so yeah, I would say that the reason why so many people would say that yeah fear of mortality It s not front and center in my worldview Yeah, I don t really think about it much doesn t really matter too much The reason why they re able to say that is because this thing called culture has emerged over the course of the last 10,000 years and part of the role of culture is to give us a means of not thinking about our mortality all the time of not living in terror of the inevitable end of
5
SPEAKER_00
which faces us all.
5
SPEAKER_00
So it s completely understandable that that s the response because that s what culture is at least in part for.
5
SPEAKER_00
It s at least possible.
5
SPEAKER_01
that the fear of death, the terror of your mortality is the creative force that created all of the things around us at this human civilization.
5
SPEAKER_01
And I think about from an engineering perspective, this is where I lose all of my robotics colleagues, is I feel like if you want to create intelligence, you have to also
5
SPEAKER_01
engineer in some kind of echoes of this kind of fear of, you know, fear is such a complicated word, but kind of like a scarcity
5
SPEAKER_01
a scarcity of time, a scarcity of resources, that creates a kind of anxiety, like deadlines get you to do stuff.
5
SPEAKER_01
And there s something almost fundamental to that in terms of human experience.
5
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, well, that s an interesting thought.
5
SPEAKER_00
So you re basically, in order to create a kind of structure that mirrors what we call consciousness, you d better have that structure
5
SPEAKER_00
confront the same kinds of issues and terrors that we do.
5
SPEAKER_01
Consciousness and suffering only make sense in the context of death.
5
SPEAKER_01
I feel like if you want to fit into human society, if you re a robot and you want to fit into human society, you better have the same kind of existential dread, the same kind of fear of mortality, otherwise you re not gonna fit in.
5
SPEAKER_01
It might be wild, but it s at least like we re talking about all the theories that are at least worth consideration.
5
SPEAKER_01
I think that s a really powerful one.
5
SPEAKER_01
And definitely one has resonated with me and definitely seems to capture something
5
SPEAKER_01
beautifully like real about the human condition.
5
SPEAKER_01
And I wonder, it s of course sucks to think that we need death to appreciate life.
5
SPEAKER_00
But that just may be the way it is.
5
SPEAKER_00
Well, it s interesting if this robotic or artificially intelligent system understands the world and understands the second law of thermodynamics and entropy,
5
SPEAKER_00
even in artificial intelligence will realize that even if its parts are really robust, ultimately it will disintegrate.
5
SPEAKER_00
I mean, so the timescales may be different, but in a way when you think about it, it doesn t matter.
5
SPEAKER_00
Once you know that you are mortal in the sense that you are not eternal, the timescale hardly matters because
5
SPEAKER_00
it s either the whole thing or not.
5
SPEAKER_00
Because on the scales of eternity, any finite duration, however large, is effectively zero on the scales of eternity.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so maybe it won t be so hard for an artificial system to feel that sense of mortality because it will recognize the underlying physical laws and recognize its own finitude.
5
SPEAKER_01
And then it ll be us and robots drinking beers, looking up at the stars and just,
5
SPEAKER_01
you know, having a good laugh in awe of the whole thing.
5
SPEAKER_01
I think that s a pretty good way to end it, talking about the fear of death.
5
SPEAKER_01
We started talking about the meaning of life and ended on the fear of death, Brian.
5
SPEAKER_01
It s just an incredible conversation.
5
SPEAKER_01
I really, really enjoyed it.
5
SPEAKER_01
It s been a long time coming.
5
SPEAKER_01
I m a huge fan of your work, a huge fan of your writing.
5
SPEAKER_01
Thanks for talking today, Brian.
5
SPEAKER_01
Thank you.
5
SPEAKER_01
Thanks for listening to this conversation with Brian Greene.
5
SPEAKER_01
To support this podcast, please check out our sponsors in the description.
5
SPEAKER_01
And now, let me leave you with some words from Bill Bryson.
5
SPEAKER_01
Physics is really nothing more than a search for ultimate simplicity.
5
SPEAKER_01
But so far, all we have is a kind of elegant messiness.
5
SPEAKER_01
Thank you for listening and hope to see you next time.