0
SPEAKER_01
The following is a conversation with Ben Shapiro, a conservative political commentator, host of The Ben Shapiro Show, co-founder of The Daily Wire, and author of several books, including The Authoritarian Moment, The Right Side of History, and Facts Don t Care About Your Feelings.
0
SPEAKER_01
Whatever your political leanings, I humbly ask that you try to put those aside and listen with an open mind, trying to give the most charitable interpretation of the words we say.
0
SPEAKER_01
This is true in general for this podcast, whether the guest is Ben Shapiro or Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Donald Trump or Barack Obama.
0
SPEAKER_01
I will talk to everyone from every side, from the far left to the far right, from presidents to prisoners, from artists to scientists, from the powerful to the powerless, because we are all human, all capable of good and evil,
0
SPEAKER_01
all with fascinating stories and ideas to explore.
0
SPEAKER_01
I seek only to understand, and in so doing, hopefully add a bit of love to the world.
0
SPEAKER_01
And now, a quick few second mention of each sponsor.
0
SPEAKER_01
Check them out in the description.
0
SPEAKER_01
It s the best way to support this podcast.
0
SPEAKER_01
We got ExpressVPN for privacy, PolicyGenius for life insurance, BetterHelp for therapy, and InsightTracker for biological monitoring.
0
SPEAKER_01
Choose wisely, my friends.
0
SPEAKER_01
And now, on to the full ad reads.
0
SPEAKER_01
As always, no ads in the middle.
0
SPEAKER_01
I try to make these interesting, but if you skip them, please still check out the sponsors.
0
SPEAKER_01
I enjoy their stuff.
0
SPEAKER_01
Maybe you will, too.
0
SPEAKER_01
This show is brought to you by a long time beloved sponsor of mine, ExpressVPN.
0
SPEAKER_01
I ve been using them for many, many, many years.
0
SPEAKER_01
It has brought joy to my heart for many reasons, some of which you can infer.
0
SPEAKER_01
because it has opened my mind and my spirit to the internet while keeping me protected, which is what a great VPN does.
0
SPEAKER_01
And that s the one I ve always used.
0
SPEAKER_01
It s the one I ve always recommended.
0
SPEAKER_01
It always had the big sexy button that you just press and everything works.
0
SPEAKER_01
It s super, super easy.
0
SPEAKER_01
It works really fast.
0
SPEAKER_01
Wherever the geographical region you connect to, at least all the places I ve tried, it s super fast, works on any device.
0
SPEAKER_01
Linux included.
0
SPEAKER_01
It s kind of amazing that I haven t talked to Linus Torvald yet.
0
SPEAKER_01
Not sure why, exactly.
0
SPEAKER_01
I haven t really tried, and he doesn t actually make himself super easy to reach.
0
SPEAKER_01
There s a man who focuses on his work, which of course I deeply respect.
0
SPEAKER_01
Go to expressvpn.com slash LexPod for an extra three months free.
0
SPEAKER_01
This show is also brought to you by Policy Genius, which is a marketplace for finding and buying insurance.
0
SPEAKER_01
I do wonder, since on this podcast we talk about immortality sometimes, what happens to life insurance when you re genetically guaranteed to be immortal?
0
SPEAKER_01
I mean, because there s not gonna be 100% guarantee, obviously.
0
SPEAKER_01
There s going to be ways to destroy the genetic material.
0
SPEAKER_01
where you re not gonna be able to reprint your body and mind.
0
SPEAKER_01
At least you won t be able to reprint memories.
0
SPEAKER_01
Maybe it ll be insurance on your memories.
0
SPEAKER_01
Like you re not going to ensure the life of your body and everything within it, but you re going to ensure the sort of the data, the information inside your brain.
0
SPEAKER_01
If it gets corrupted and destroyed, the people you love will get some money.
0
SPEAKER_01
That s a really interesting future idea, but unfortunately or fortunately, depends where you land on the debate, we live in a time when all of us do face mortality.
0
SPEAKER_01
and it always comes too soon and unexpected.
0
SPEAKER_01
So for that, you should have life insurance.
0
SPEAKER_01
With Policy Genius, you can find life insurance policy that start at just 70 bucks a month for $500,000 of coverage.
0
SPEAKER_01
Head to policygenius.com or click the link in the description to get your free life insurance quotes and see how much you could save.
0
SPEAKER_01
That s policygenius.com.
0
SPEAKER_01
This episode is also brought to you by BetterHelp.
0
SPEAKER_01
spelled H-E-L-P, help every time I say that I think about Tom Hanks in the movie Cast Away, which I think is not a critically acclaimed movie, but I really enjoy it.
0
SPEAKER_01
There s something about a man alone against the elements.
0
SPEAKER_01
faced with a sort of explicit manifestation of his loneliness.
0
SPEAKER_01
Most of us walk about our lives with our loneliness on the inside.
0
SPEAKER_01
Here that loneliness is made explicit, it s real, it s made unavoidable.
0
SPEAKER_01
We can t lose ourselves in the daily busyness of life with the people around us.
0
SPEAKER_01
We have to face that loneliness when you re alone on an island.
0
SPEAKER_01
And even then, we find camaraderie with a volleyball.
0
SPEAKER_01
There you go, and write help on the sand, hoping somebody will save us.
0
SPEAKER_01
So here we are, not alone on an island, but nevertheless are deeply lonely, deeply troubled, and are looking for ways to become better versions of ourselves.
0
SPEAKER_01
For that, talk therapy is great.
0
SPEAKER_01
I recommend BetterHelp for that kind of thing.
0
SPEAKER_01
Check them out at betterhelp.com slash Lex, and save on your first month.
0
SPEAKER_01
This show is also brought to you by Inside Tracker, a service I use to track biological data that comes from my body and gives me wisdom about which way I should walk through life.
0
SPEAKER_01
Lifestyle changes.
0
SPEAKER_01
diet recommendations, all to improve my life.
0
SPEAKER_01
The trajectory of your life should not be defined by a blog post you read somewhere, an advice column in a magazine with a sexy guy or girl on the cover.
0
SPEAKER_01
It should come from the data that comes from your own body.
0
SPEAKER_01
That s the 21st century.
0
SPEAKER_01
There needs to be machine learning algorithms that integrate
0
SPEAKER_01
as much data as possible that comes from the body, obviously, in a privacy-preserving way, and then give you recommendations based on that.
0
SPEAKER_01
It doesn t matter what works for the population.
0
SPEAKER_01
What matters is what works for you and you alone.
0
SPEAKER_01
Individualized, personalized, health, life, everything.
0
SPEAKER_01
What do I do in this world?
0
SPEAKER_01
Please tell me.
0
SPEAKER_01
Please tell me, oh wise oracle.
0
SPEAKER_01
Of course, the oracle s not gonna be able to tell you everything.
0
SPEAKER_01
You re gonna have to figure out some of it on your own.
0
SPEAKER_01
But it s always nice to have a mentor, somebody to give you words of advice, even if you choose to ignore them.
0
SPEAKER_01
Anyway, get special savings for a limited time when you go to insighttracker.com slash Lex.
0
SPEAKER_01
This is the Lex Friedman Podcast.
0
SPEAKER_01
To support it, please check out our sponsors in the description.
0
SPEAKER_01
And now, dear friends, here s Ben Shapiro.
0
SPEAKER_01
Let s start with a difficult topic.
0
SPEAKER_01
What do you think about the comments made by Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, about Jewish people?
0
SPEAKER_00
They re awful and anti-semitic and they seem to get worse over time.
0
SPEAKER_00
They started off with the bizarre DEFCON 3 tweet and then they went into
0
SPEAKER_00
even more stereotypical garbage about Jews and Jews being sexual manipulators.
0
SPEAKER_00
I think that s the Pete Davidson, Kim Kardashian stuff.
0
SPEAKER_00
And then Jews running all of the media, Jews being in charge of the financial sector, Jewish people.
0
SPEAKER_00
I mean, there s no, I mean, I called it on my show, there s Sherman Nazism and it is, I mean, it s like right from protocols of the elders of Zion type stuff.
0
SPEAKER_01
Do you think those words come from pain?
0
SPEAKER_01
Where d they come from?
0
SPEAKER_00
And you know, it s always hard to try and read somebody s mind.
0
SPEAKER_00
What he looks like to me, just having experience in my own family, people who are bipolar, is he seems like a bipolar personality.
0
SPEAKER_00
He seems like somebody who is in the middle of a manic episode.
0
SPEAKER_00
And when you re manic, you tend to say a lot of things that you shouldn t say.
0
SPEAKER_00
And you tend to believe that they re the most brilliant things ever said.
0
SPEAKER_00
The Washington Post, an entire piece speculating about how bipolarism played into the kind of stuff that Ye was saying.
0
SPEAKER_00
And it s hard for me to think that it s not playing into it, especially because even if he is an anti-Semite, and I have no reason to suspect he s not, given all of his comments, if he had an ounce of common sense, he would stop at a certain point.
0
SPEAKER_00
And bipolarism tends to drive you well past the point where common sense
0
SPEAKER_00
applies.
0
SPEAKER_00
So I mean, I would imagine it s coming from that.
0
SPEAKER_00
I mean, from his comments, I would also imagine that he s doing the logical mistake that that a lot of anti Semites or racist or bigots do, which is
0
SPEAKER_00
Somebody hurt me.
0
SPEAKER_00
That person is a Jew.
0
SPEAKER_00
Therefore, all Jews are bad.
0
SPEAKER_00
And that jump from a person did something to me I don t like, who s a member of a particular race or class, and therefore everybody of that race or class is bad.
0
SPEAKER_00
I mean, that s textbook bigotry, and that s pretty obviously what Ye is engaging in here.
0
SPEAKER_01
So jumping from the individual to the group.
0
SPEAKER_00
That s the way he s been expressing it, right?
0
SPEAKER_00
He keeps talking about his Jewish agents.
0
SPEAKER_00
And I watched your interview with him, and you kept saying, so just name the agents, right?
0
SPEAKER_00
Just name the people who are screwing you.
0
SPEAKER_00
And he wouldn t do it.
0
SPEAKER_00
Instead, he just kept going back to the general, the group, the Jews in general.
0
SPEAKER_00
I mean, that s textbook bigotry.
0
SPEAKER_00
And if it were put in any other context, he would probably recognize it as such.
0
SPEAKER_01
to the degree as words fuel hate in the world.
0
SPEAKER_01
What s the way to reverse that process?
0
SPEAKER_01
What s the way to alleviate the hate?
0
SPEAKER_00
I mean, when it comes to alleviating the kind of stuff that he s saying, obviously debunking it, making clear that what he s saying is garbage.
0
SPEAKER_00
But the reality is that I think that for most people who are in any way engaged with these issues,
0
SPEAKER_00
I don t think they re being convinced to be anti-Semitic by Ye.
0
SPEAKER_00
I mean I think there s a group of people who may be swayed that anti-Semitism is acceptable because Ye is saying what he s saying and he s saying so very loudly and he s saying it over and over.
0
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, I think that, for example, there are these signs that are popping up in Los Angeles saying Ye is right.
0
SPEAKER_00
Well, that group s been out there posting anti-Semitic signs on the freeways for years.
0
SPEAKER_00
And there are groups like that posting anti-Semitic signs where I live in Florida.
0
SPEAKER_00
They ve been doing that for years, well before Ye was saying this sort of stuff.
0
SPEAKER_00
It s just like latest opportunity to kind of jump on that particular bandwagon.
0
SPEAKER_00
But listen, I think that people do have a moral duty to call that stuff out.
0
SPEAKER_01
So there is a degree to which it normalizes
0
SPEAKER_01
that kind of idea that Jews control the media, Jews control X institution.
0
SPEAKER_01
Is there a way to talk about a high representation of a group like Jewish people in a certain
0
SPEAKER_00
Institution like the media or Hollywood and so on without it being a hateful Conversation of course a high percentage of higher than statistically represented in the population percentage of
0
SPEAKER_00
Hollywood agents are probably Jewish.
0
SPEAKER_00
A higher percentage of lawyers generally are probably Jewish.
0
SPEAKER_00
A higher percentage of accountants are probably Jewish.
0
SPEAKER_00
Also, a higher percentage of engineers are probably Asian.
0
SPEAKER_00
Statistical truths are statistical truths.
0
SPEAKER_00
It doesn t necessarily mean anything about the
0
SPEAKER_00
nature of the people who are being talked about.
0
SPEAKER_00
There are a myriad of reasons why people might be disproportionately in one arena or another, ranging from the cultural to sometimes the genetic.
0
SPEAKER_00
I mean, there are certain areas of the world where people are better long distance runners because of their genetic adaptations in those particular areas of the world.
0
SPEAKER_00
That s not racist.
0
SPEAKER_00
That s just fact.
0
SPEAKER_00
What starts to get racist is when you are attributing a bad characteristic to an entire population based on
0
SPEAKER_00
the notion that some members of that population are doing bad things.
0
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, there s a jump between, it s also possible that record label owners as a group
0
SPEAKER_01
have a kind of culture that Fs over artists, doesn t treat artists fairly.
0
SPEAKER_01
And it s also possible that there s a high representation of Jews in the group of people that own record labels.
0
SPEAKER_01
But it s that small, but a very big leap that people take from the group that own record labels to all Jews.
0
SPEAKER_00
For sure.
0
SPEAKER_00
And I think that one of the other issues also is that
0
SPEAKER_00
anti-semitism is fascinating because it breaks down into so many different parts, meaning that if you look at sort of different types of anti-semitism, if you re a racist against black people, it s typically because you re racist based on the color of their skin.
0
SPEAKER_00
If you re racist against the Jews, you re anti-semitic, then there are actually a few different ways that breaks down, right?
0
SPEAKER_00
You have anti-semitism in terms of ethnicity, which is like Nazi-esque anti-semitism.
0
SPEAKER_00
You have Jewish parentage, you have a Jewish grandparent, therefore your blood is corrupt and you are inherently going to have bad properties.
0
SPEAKER_00
Then there s sort of old school religious antisemitism, which is that the Jews are the killers of Christ or the Jews are the sons of pigs and monkeys, and therefore Judaism is bad and therefore Jews are bad.
0
SPEAKER_00
And the way that you get out of that antisemitism, historically speaking, is mass conversion, which most antisemitism for a couple thousand years actually was not ethnic.
0
SPEAKER_00
It was much more rooted in this sort of stuff, right?
0
SPEAKER_00
If a Jew converted out of the faith, then the anti-Semitism was quote-unquote alleviated.
0
SPEAKER_00
And then there s a sort of bizarre anti-Semitism that s political anti-Semitism, and that is members of a group that I don t like are disproportionately Jewish, therefore all Jews are
0
SPEAKER_00
are members of this group or are predominantly represented in this group.
0
SPEAKER_00
So you ll see Nazis saying the communists are Jews.
0
SPEAKER_00
You ll see communists saying the Nazis are Jews.
0
SPEAKER_00
Or you ll see communists saying that the capitalists, rather, are Jews.
0
SPEAKER_00
And so that s the weird thing about antisemitism.
0
SPEAKER_00
It s kind of like the Jews behind every corner.
0
SPEAKER_00
It s basically a big conspiracy theory.
0
SPEAKER_00
Unlike a lot of other forms of racism, which are not really conspiracy theory, antisemitism tends to be a conspiracy theory about believers of power being controlled by a shadowy cadre of people who are getting together behind closed doors to control things.
0
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, the most absurd illustration of anti-Semitism, just like you said, is Stalin versus Hitler over Poland, that every bad guy was a Jew.
0
SPEAKER_01
It was like, so every enemy, there s a lot of different enemy groups, intellectuals, political and so on, military, and behind any movement that is considered the enemy for the Nazis and any movement that s considered the enemy for the Soviet Army are the Jews.
0
SPEAKER_01
What does the fact that Hitler took power teach you about human nature?
0
SPEAKER_01
When you look back at the history of the 20th century, what do you learn from that time?
0
SPEAKER_00
I mean, there are a bunch of lessons to Hitler taking power.
0
SPEAKER_00
The first thing I think people ought to recognize about Hitler taking power is that the power had been centralized in the government before Hitler took it.
0
SPEAKER_00
So if you actually look at the history of Nazi Germany, the Weimar Republic had effectively collapsed.
0
SPEAKER_00
The power had been centralized in the chancellery and really under Hindenburg for a couple of years before that.
0
SPEAKER_00
And so it was only a matter of time until someone who was bad grabbed the power.
0
SPEAKER_00
And so the struggle between the Reds and the Browns in Nazism in pre-Nazi Germany
0
SPEAKER_00
led to this kind of up spiraling of radical sentiment that allowed Hitler in through the front door, not through the back door, right?
0
SPEAKER_00
He was elected.
0
SPEAKER_01
So you think communists could have also taken power?
0
SPEAKER_00
I mean, there s no question communists could have taken power.
0
SPEAKER_00
They were a serious force in pre-Nazi Germany.
0
SPEAKER_01
Do you think there was an underlying current that would have led to an atrocity if the communists had taken power?
0
SPEAKER_00
Wouldn t have been quite the same atrocity, but obviously the communists in Soviet Russia at exactly this time were committing the Haladomar.
0
SPEAKER_00
So there were very few good guys in terms of good parties.
0
SPEAKER_00
The moderate parties were being dragged by the radicals.
0
SPEAKER_00
into alliance with them to prevent the worst case scenario from the other guy, right?
0
SPEAKER_00
So if you look at, I m sort of fascinated by the history of this period, because it really does speak to how does a democracy break down?
0
SPEAKER_00
I mean, the 20s, Weimar Republic was a very liberal democracy.
0
SPEAKER_00
How does a liberal democracy break down into complete fascism and then into genocide?
0
SPEAKER_00
And there s a character who was very prominent in the history of that time named Franz von Papen, who was actually the second to last chancellor of the republic before Hitler.
0
SPEAKER_00
So he was the chancellor and then he handed over to Schleicher.
0
SPEAKER_00
And then Schleicher ended up collapsing and that ended up handing power over to Hitler.
0
SPEAKER_00
It was Papen who had stumped for Hitler to become chancellor.
0
SPEAKER_00
Papen was a Catholic Democrat.
0
SPEAKER_00
He didn t like Hitler.
0
SPEAKER_00
He thought that Hitler was a radical and a nut job.
0
SPEAKER_00
But he also thought that Hitler being a buffoon, as he saw it, was going to essentially be usable by the right forces in order to get the in order to prevent the communists from taking power.
0
SPEAKER_00
Maybe in order to restore some sort of legitimacy to the regime because he was popular.
0
SPEAKER_00
in order for Papen to retain power himself.
0
SPEAKER_00
And then immediately after Hitler taking power, Hitler basically kills all of Papen s friends.
0
SPEAKER_00
Papen, out of quote-unquote loyalty, stays on.
1
SPEAKER_00
ends up helping the Anshulis in Austria.
1
SPEAKER_00
Now all this stuff is really interesting mainly because what it speaks to is the great lie we tell ourselves that people who are evil are not like us.
1
SPEAKER_00
They re a class apart.
1
SPEAKER_00
People who do evil things.
1
SPEAKER_00
People who support evil people.
1
SPEAKER_00
People, they re not like us.
1
SPEAKER_00
That s an easy call.
1
SPEAKER_00
Everybody in history who has sinned is a person who s very different from me.
1
SPEAKER_00
Robert George, the philosopher over at Princeton, he s fond of doing a sort of thought experiment in his classes where he asks people to raise their hand if they had lived in Alabama in 1861, how many of you would be abolitionists?
1
SPEAKER_00
And everybody raises their hand.
1
SPEAKER_00
He says, of course, that s not true.
1
SPEAKER_00
Of course that s not true.
1
SPEAKER_00
The best protection against evil is recognizing that it lies in every human heart and the possibility that it takes you over.
1
SPEAKER_00
And so you have to be very cautious in how you approach these issues and the back and forth of politics, the sort of bipolarity of politics, or the polarization in politics might be a better way to put it.
1
SPEAKER_00
makes it very easy to kind of fall into the Rock em Sock em robots that eventually could theoretically allow you to support somebody who s truly
1
SPEAKER_00
frightening and hideous in order to stop somebody who you think is more frightening and hideous.
1
SPEAKER_00
And you see this kind of language, by the way, now predominating almost all over the Western world, right?
1
SPEAKER_00
My political enemy is an enemy of democracy.
1
SPEAKER_00
My political enemy is going to end the republic.
1
SPEAKER_00
My political enemy is going to be the person who destroys the country we live in.
1
SPEAKER_00
And so that person has to be stopped by any means necessary.
1
SPEAKER_00
And that s dangerous stuff.
1
SPEAKER_01
So the communists had to be stopped in Nazi Germany, and so they re the devil, and so any useful buffoon, as long as they re effective against the communists, would do.
1
SPEAKER_01
Do you ever wonder, because the people that are participating in evil may not understand that they re doing evil, do you ever sit back
1
SPEAKER_01
you know, in the quiet of your mind and think, am I participating in evil?
1
SPEAKER_00
I mean, so my business partner and I, one of our favorite memes is from, there s a British comedy show, the name escapes me, of these two guys who are members of the SS and they re dressed in the SS uniforms and the black uniforms, they put the skulls on them and they re saying to each other, one says to the other guy, you notice like the British, the symbol is something,
1
SPEAKER_00
It s something nice and it s like an eagle.
1
SPEAKER_00
But it s a skull and crossbones.
1
SPEAKER_00
You see the Americans.
1
SPEAKER_00
You see their blue uniforms.
1
SPEAKER_00
They re very nice and pretty.
1
SPEAKER_00
Ours are jet black.
1
SPEAKER_00
Are we the baddies?
1
SPEAKER_00
And the truth is we look back at the Nazis and we say, well, of course they were the baddies.
1
SPEAKER_00
They wore black uniforms and they had jackboots and they had this.
1
SPEAKER_00
And of course they were the bad guys, but evil rarely presents its face so clearly.
1
SPEAKER_00
So yeah, I mean, I think you have to constantly be thinking along those lines and hopefully you try to avoid it.
1
SPEAKER_00
You can only do the best that a human being can do.
1
SPEAKER_00
But yeah, I mean, the answer is yes.
1
SPEAKER_00
I would say that.
1
SPEAKER_00
I spend an inordinate amount of time reflecting on whether I m doing the right thing.
1
SPEAKER_00
And I may not always do the right thing.
1
SPEAKER_00
I m sure a lot of people think that I m doing the wrong thing on a daily basis.
1
SPEAKER_00
But it s definitely a question that has to enter your mind as a historically aware and hopefully morally decent person.
1
SPEAKER_01
Do you think you re mentally strong enough if you realize
1
SPEAKER_01
that you re on the wrong side of history to switch sides.
1
SPEAKER_01
Very few people in history seem to be strong enough to do that.
1
SPEAKER_00
I mean, I think that the answer I hope would be yes.
1
SPEAKER_00
You never know until the time comes and you have to do it.
1
SPEAKER_00
I will say that having heterodox opinions in a wide variety of areas is something that I have done before.
1
SPEAKER_00
I m the only
1
SPEAKER_00
person I ve ever heard of in public life who actually has a list on their website of all the dumb, stupid things I ve ever said.
1
SPEAKER_00
So where I go through and I either say, this is why I still believe this, or this is why what I said was terrible and stupid.
1
SPEAKER_00
And I m sure that list will get a lot longer as the years go on.
1
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, I look forward to new additions to that list.
1
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, exactly.
1
SPEAKER_01
It actually is a super, super long list.
1
SPEAKER_01
People should check it out.
1
SPEAKER_01
And it s quite honest and raw.
1
SPEAKER_01
What do you think about, it s interesting to ask you, given
1
SPEAKER_01
how pro-life you are about Ye s comments about comparing the Holocaust to the 900,000 abortions in the United States a year.
1
SPEAKER_00
So I ll take this from two angles.
1
SPEAKER_00
As a pro-life person, I actually didn t find it offensive because if you believe, as I do, that unborn and preborn lives deserve protection, then the slaughter of just under a million of them every year for the last almost 50 years is a historic tragedy on par with a Holocaust.
1
SPEAKER_00
From the outside perspective, I get why people would say there s a difference in how people view the pre-born as to how people view, say, a seven-year-old who s being killed in the Holocaust.
1
SPEAKER_00
Like, the visceral power and evil of the Nazis shoving full-grown human beings and small children into gas chambers can t be compared to...
1
SPEAKER_00
a person who, even from a pro-life perspective, may not fully understand the consequences of their own decisions, or from a pro-choice perspective, fully understands the consequences, but just doesn t think that that person is a person, that that s actually different.
1
SPEAKER_00
So I understand both sides of it.
1
SPEAKER_00
I wasn t offended by Ye s comments in that way, though.
1
SPEAKER_00
Because if you re a pro-life human being, then you do think that what s happening is a great tragedy on scale that involves the dehumanization of an entire class of people,
1
SPEAKER_00
the pre-born.
1
SPEAKER_00
So the philosophical, you understand the comparison?
1
SPEAKER_00
I do.
1
SPEAKER_01
Sure.
1
SPEAKER_01
So in his comments, in the jumping from the individual to the group, I d like to ask you, you re one of the most effective people in the world at attacking the left.
1
SPEAKER_01
and sometimes they can slip into attacking the group.
1
SPEAKER_01
Do you worry that that s the same kind of oversimplification that Ye is doing about Jewish people that you can sometimes do with the left as a group?
1
SPEAKER_00
So when I speak about the left, I m speaking about a philosophy.
1
SPEAKER_00
I m not really speaking about individual human beings as
1
SPEAKER_00
the leftists-like group and then try to name who the members of this individual group are.
1
SPEAKER_00
I also make a distinction between the left and liberals.
1
SPEAKER_00
There are a lot of people who are liberal who disagree with me on taxes, disagree with me on foreign policy, disagree with me on a lot of things.
1
SPEAKER_00
The people who I m talking about generally when I talk about the left in the United States are people who believe that alternative points of view ought to be silenced because they are damaging and harmful simply based on the disagreement.
1
SPEAKER_00
So that s one distinction.
1
SPEAKER_00
The second distinction again is when I talk about the right versus the left, typically I m talking about
1
SPEAKER_00
a battle of competing philosophies.
1
SPEAKER_00
And so I m not speaking about typically, it would be hard to if you put a person in front of me and said, is this person of the left or of the right, having just met them, I wouldn t be able to label them in the same way that if you met somebody in the name of Greenstein, you d immediately got you or you make a black person s black person.
1
SPEAKER_00
And that the adherence to a philosophy makes you a member of
1
SPEAKER_00
a group, if I think the philosophy is bad, that doesn t necessarily mean that you as a person are bad, but it does mean that I think your philosophy is bad.
1
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, so the grouping is based on the philosophy versus something like a race, like the color of your skin or race as in the case of the Jewish people.
1
SPEAKER_01
So it s a different thing.
1
SPEAKER_01
You can be a little bit more nonchalant and careless in attacking a group because it s ultimately attacking a set of ideas.
1
SPEAKER_00
Well, I mean, it s really nonchalant in attacking the set of ideas, and I don t know that nonchalant would be the way I d put it.
1
SPEAKER_00
I d try to be exact when you re, you know, you don t always hit, but, you know, if I say that I oppose the communists, right, and then presumably I m speaking of people who believe in the communist philosophy.
1
SPEAKER_00
Now, the question is whether I m mislabeling, right?
1
SPEAKER_00
Whether I m taking someone who s not actually a communist and then shoving them in that group of communists, right?
1
SPEAKER_00
That would be inaccurate.
1
SPEAKER_01
The dangerous thing is it expands the group as opposed to you talking about the philosophy.
1
SPEAKER_01
You re throwing everybody who s ever said, I m curious about communism.
1
SPEAKER_01
I m curious about socialism.
1
SPEAKER_01
Because there s like a gradient.
1
SPEAKER_01
You know, it s like to throw something at you, I think Joe Biden said MAGA Republicans, right?
1
SPEAKER_01
Right.
1
SPEAKER_01
You know, I think that s a very careless statement because the thing you jump to immediately is like all Republicans for Trump versus I think in the charitable interpretation that means a set of ideas.
1
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, my actually problem with the MAGA Republicans line from Biden is that he went on in the speech that he made in front of Independence Hall to actually try and define what it meant to be a MAGA Republican who was a threat to the Republic was the kind of language that he was using.
1
SPEAKER_00
And later on in the speech, he actually suggested, well, you know, there are moderate Republicans, and the moderate Republicans are people who agree with me on like the Inflation Reduction Act.
1
SPEAKER_00
It s like, well, that can t be the dividing line between a MAGA Republican and a moderate, like a moderate Republican, somebody who agrees with you.
1
SPEAKER_00
You got to name me like a Republican who disagrees with you fairly strenuously, but is not in this group of threats to the Republic.
1
SPEAKER_00
You make that distinction, we can have a fair discussion about whether the idea of election denial, for example, makes somebody, you know, a threat to institutions.
1
SPEAKER_00
That s a conversation that we can have, and then we ll have to discuss how much power they have, what the actual perspective is, delve into it.
1
SPEAKER_00
But I think that he was being overbroad and sort of labeling all of his political enemies under one rubric.
1
SPEAKER_00
Now, again, in politics, this stuff sort of happens all the time.
1
SPEAKER_00
I m not going to plead clean hands here because I m sure that I ve been inexact.
1
SPEAKER_00
But what would be good in that particular situation is for somebody to sort of read me back the quote, and I ll let you know where I ve been inaccurate.
1
SPEAKER_00
I ll try to do that.
1
SPEAKER_01
And also you don t shy away from humor and occasional trolling and mockery and all that kind of stuff for the fun, for the chaos, all that kind of stuff.
1
SPEAKER_00
I mean, I try not to do trollery for trollery s sake, but if the show s not entertaining and not fun, people aren t going to listen.
1
SPEAKER_00
And so if you can t have fun with politics, the truth about politics is we all take it very seriously because it has some serious ramifications.
1
SPEAKER_00
Politics is Veep, it is not House of Cards.
1
SPEAKER_00
the general rule of politics is that everyone is a moron unless proven otherwise, that virtually everything is done out of stupidity rather than malice, and that if you actually watch politics as a comedy, you ll have a lot more fun.
1
SPEAKER_00
And so the difficulty for me is I take politics seriously, but also I have the ability to sort of flip the switch and suddenly it all becomes incredibly funny because it really is.
1
SPEAKER_00
Like if you just watch it from a pure entertainment perspective and you put aside the fact that it affects hundreds of millions of people, then watching, you know,
1
SPEAKER_00
President Trump being president, I mean, he s one of the funniest humans who s ever lived.
1
SPEAKER_00
Watching Kamala Harris be Kamala Harris and talking about how much she loves Venn diagrams or electric buses, I mean, that s funny stuff.
1
SPEAKER_00
So if I can t make fun of that, then my job becomes pretty morose pretty quickly.
1
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, it s funny to figure out what is the perfect balance between
1
SPEAKER_01
seeing the humor and the absurdity of the game of it versus taking it seriously enough because it does affect hundreds of millions of people.
1
SPEAKER_01
It s a weird balance to strike.
1
SPEAKER_01
It s like, I am afraid with the internet that everything becomes a joke.
1
SPEAKER_00
I totally agree with this.
1
SPEAKER_00
I will say this.
1
SPEAKER_00
I try to make less jokes about the ideas and more jokes about the people in the same way that I make jokes about myself.
1
SPEAKER_00
I m pretty self-effacing in terms of my humor.
1
SPEAKER_00
I would say at least half the jokes on my show are about me.
1
SPEAKER_00
When I m reading ads for Tommy John and they re talking about their no wedgie guarantee, I ll say things like, you know, that would help me in high school because it would ve.
1
SPEAKER_00
I mean, just factually speaking.
1
SPEAKER_00
If I can speak that way about myself, I feel like everybody else can take it as well.
1
SPEAKER_01
Difficult question.
1
SPEAKER_01
In 2017, there was a mosque shooting in Quebec City.
1
SPEAKER_01
Six people died, five others seriously injured.
1
SPEAKER_01
The 27-year-old gunman consumed a lot of content online and checked Twitter accounts of a lot of people, but one of the people he checked quite a lot of was you.
1
SPEAKER_01
93 times in the month leading up to the shooting.
1
SPEAKER_01
If you could talk to that young man, what would you tell him?
1
SPEAKER_01
And maybe other young men listening to this that have hate in their heart in that same way, what would you tell them?
1
SPEAKER_00
You re getting it wrong.
1
SPEAKER_00
If anything that I or anyone else in mainstream politics says drives you to violence, you re getting it wrong.
1
SPEAKER_00
You re getting it wrong.
1
SPEAKER_00
Now, again, when it comes to stuff like this, I have a hard and fast rule that I ve applied evenly across the spectrum, and that is I never blame people s politics for other people committing acts of violence unless they re actively advocating violence.
1
SPEAKER_00
So when a fan of Bernie Sanders shoots up a congressional baseball game, that is not Bernie Sanders  fault.
1
SPEAKER_00
I may not like his rhetoric.
1
SPEAKER_00
I may disagree with him on everything.
1
SPEAKER_00
Bernie Sanders did not tell somebody to go shoot up a congressional baseball game.
1
SPEAKER_00
When a nutcase in San Francisco goes and hits Paul Pelosi with a hammer, I m not going to blame Kevin McCarthy, the House Speaker, for that.
1
SPEAKER_00
when somebody threatens Brett Kavanaugh.
1
SPEAKER_00
I m not going to I m not going to suggest that that was Joe Biden s fault because it s not Joe Biden s fault.
1
SPEAKER_00
I mean, we can play this game all day long.
1
SPEAKER_00
And I find that the people who are most intensely focused on playing this game are people who tend to oppose the politics of the person as opposed to actually believing sincerely that this has driven somebody into the arms of the god of violence.
1
SPEAKER_00
But, you know, I I have four point seven million Twitter followers.
1
SPEAKER_00
I have
1
SPEAKER_00
8 million Facebook followers.
1
SPEAKER_00
I have 5 million YouTube followers.
1
SPEAKER_00
I would imagine that some of them are people who are violent.
1
SPEAKER_00
I would imagine that some of them are people who do evil things or want to do evil things.
1
SPEAKER_00
And I wish that there were a wand that we could wave that would prevent those people from deliberately or mistakenly misinterpreting things as a call to violence.
1
SPEAKER_00
It s just a negative byproduct of the fact that you can reach a lot of people.
1
SPEAKER_00
And so
1
SPEAKER_00
you know, if somebody could point me to the comment that that I suppose, quote unquote, drove somebody to go and literally murder human beings, then I would appreciate it.
1
SPEAKER_00
So I could so I could talk about the comment, but I don t mainly because I just think that if we remove agency from individuals,
1
SPEAKER_00
And we – if we blame broad scale political rhetoric for every act of violence, we re not going to – the people who are going to pay the price are actually the general population because free speech will go away.
1
SPEAKER_00
If the idea is that things that we say could drive somebody who is unbalanced to go do something evil.
1
SPEAKER_00
the necessary byproduct is hate, is that speech is a form of hate, hate is a form of violence, speech is a form of violence, speech needs to be curbed.
1
SPEAKER_00
And that to me is deeply disturbing.
1
SPEAKER_01
So definitely he, that man, that 27-year-old man is the only one responsible for the evil he did.
1
SPEAKER_01
But what if he and others like him are not nutcases?
1
SPEAKER_01
What if there are people with pain, with anger in their heart?
1
SPEAKER_01
What would you say to them?
1
SPEAKER_01
You are exceptionally influential and other people like you that speak passionately about ideas.
1
SPEAKER_01
What do you think is your opportunity to alleviate the hate in their heart?
1
SPEAKER_00
If we re speaking about people who aren t mentally ill and people who are just misguided, I d say to him, the thing that I said to every other young man in the country, you need to find meaning and purpose in forming connections that actually matter in a belief system that actually promotes general prosperity and promotes helping other people.
1
SPEAKER_00
And this is why the message that I most commonly say to young men is it s time for you to grow up, mature, get a job, get married, have a family, take care of the people around you, become a useful part of your community.
1
SPEAKER_00
I ve never at any point in my entire career suggested violence as a resort to political issues.
1
SPEAKER_00
And the whole point of having a political conversation is that it s a conversation.
1
SPEAKER_00
If I didn t think that it were worth trying to convince people of my point of view, I wouldn t do what I do for a living.
1
SPEAKER_00
So violence doesn t solve anything.
1
SPEAKER_00
No, it doesn t.
1
SPEAKER_01
as if this wasn t already a difficult conversation.
1
SPEAKER_01
Let me ask about Ilhan Omar.
1
SPEAKER_01
You ve called out her criticism of Israel policies as anti-Semitic.
1
SPEAKER_01
Is there a difference between criticizing a race of people, like the Jews, and criticizing
1
SPEAKER_01
the policies of a nation like Israel?
1
SPEAKER_00
Of course.
1
SPEAKER_00
Of course.
1
SPEAKER_00
I criticize the policies of Israel on a fairly regular basis.
1
SPEAKER_00
I would assume from a different angle than Ilhan Omar does.
1
SPEAKER_00
But yeah, I mean, I criticize the policies of a wide variety of states.
1
SPEAKER_00
And to take an example, I mean, I ve criticized Israel s policy in giving control of the Temple Mount to the Islamic Waqf, which effectively prevents anybody except for Muslims from praying up there.
1
SPEAKER_00
I ve also criticized the Israeli government for their COVID crackdown.
1
SPEAKER_00
You can criticize the policies of any government, but that s not what Ilhan Omar does.
1
SPEAKER_00
Ilhan Omar doesn t actually believe that there should be a state of Israel.
1
SPEAKER_00
She believes that Zionism is racism and that the existence of a Jewish state in Israel is, in and of itself, the great sin.
1
SPEAKER_00
That is a statement she would make about no other people in no other land.
1
SPEAKER_00
She would not say that the French don t deserve a state for the French.
1
SPEAKER_00
She wouldn t say that Somalis wouldn t deserve a state in Somalia.
1
SPEAKER_00
She wouldn t say that
1
SPEAKER_00
that Germans don t deserve a state in Germany.
1
SPEAKER_00
She wouldn t say for the 50 plus Islamic states that exist across the world that they don t deserve states of their own.
1
SPEAKER_00
It is only the Jewish state that has fallen under her significant scrutiny.
1
SPEAKER_00
And she also promulgates lies about one specific state in the form of suggesting, for example, that Israel is an apartheid state, which it is most eminently not, considering that the last unity government in Israel included an Arab party, that there are Arabs who sit
1
SPEAKER_00
on the Israeli Supreme Court and all the rest.
1
SPEAKER_00
And then beyond that, obviously, she s engaged in some of the same sort of anti-Semitic tropes that you heard from Ye, right?
1
SPEAKER_00
The stuff about it s all about the Benjamins, that American support for Israel is all about the Benjamins.
1
SPEAKER_00
And she s had to be chided by members of her own party about this sort of stuff before.
2
SPEAKER_01
Can you empathize with the plight of Palestinian people?
2
SPEAKER_00
Absolutely.
2
SPEAKER_00
I mean, I, you know, some of the uglier things that I ve ever said in my career, things that I said very early on when I was 17, 18, 19, I started writing a syndicated comment, I was 17, I m now 38.
2
SPEAKER_00
So virtually all the dumb things, I don t say virtually all, many of the dumb things, the plurality of the dumb things that I ve said came from the ages of I would say 17 to maybe 23.
2
SPEAKER_00
And they are rooted, again, in sloppy thinking.
2
SPEAKER_00
I feel terrible for people who have lived under the thumb and currently live under the thumb of Hamas, which is a national terrorist group, or the Palestinian Authority, which is a corrupt oligarchy that steals money from its people and leaves them in misery, or Islamic Jihad, which is a national terrorist group.
2
SPEAKER_00
And the basic rule for the region, in my view, is if these groups were willing to make peace with Israel, they would have a state literally tomorrow.
2
SPEAKER_00
And if they are not, then there will be no peace.
2
SPEAKER_00
And it really is that simple.
2
SPEAKER_00
If Israel, the formula that s typically used has become a bit of a bumper sticker, but it happens to be factually correct.
2
SPEAKER_00
If the Palestinians put down their guns tomorrow, there d be a state.
2
SPEAKER_00
If the Israelis put down their guns, there d be no Israel.
2
SPEAKER_01
You get attacked a lot on the internet.
2
SPEAKER_01
I gotta ask you about your own psychology.
2
SPEAKER_01
How do you not let that break you mentally?
2
SPEAKER_01
And how do you avoid letting that lead to a resentment of the groups that attack you?
2
SPEAKER_00
I mean, so there are a few sort of practical things that I ve done.
2
SPEAKER_00
So for example, I would say that four years ago, Twitter was all-consuming.
2
SPEAKER_00
Twitter is an ego machine, especially the notifications button, right?
2
SPEAKER_00
The notifications button is just people talking about you all the time, and the normal human tendency is, wow, people talking about me.
2
SPEAKER_00
I got to see what they re saying about me, which is a recipe for insanity.
2
SPEAKER_00
So my wife actually said, Twitter is making your life miserable.
2
SPEAKER_00
You need to take it off your phone.
2
SPEAKER_00
So Twitter is not on my phone.
2
SPEAKER_00
If I want to log on to Twitter, I have to go on to my computer and I have to make the conscious decision to go on to Twitter and then take a look at what s going on.
2
SPEAKER_01
I could just imagine you like there s a computer in the basement, you descend into the Czech Twitter in the darkness.
2
SPEAKER_00
If you look at when I actually tweet, it s generally like in the run-up to recording my show or when I m prepping for my show later in the afternoon, for example.
2
SPEAKER_01
That doesn t affect you negatively mentally, like put you in a bad mental space?
2
SPEAKER_00
Not particularly if it s restricted to sort of what s being watched.
2
SPEAKER_00
Now, I will say that I think the most important thing is you have to surround yourself with a group of people who you trust enough to make serious critiques of you when you re doing something wrong, but also you know that they have your best interests at heart.
2
SPEAKER_00
Because the internet is filled with people who don t have your best interests at heart and who hate your guts, and so you can t really take those critiques seriously or it does wreck you.
2
SPEAKER_00
And the world is also filled with sycophants, right?
2
SPEAKER_00
The more successful you become, there are a lot of people who will tell you you re always doing the right thing.
2
SPEAKER_00
I m very lucky.
2
SPEAKER_00
I got married when I was 24, my wife was 20, so she s known me long before I was famous or wealthy or anything.
2
SPEAKER_00
And so she s a good sounding board.
2
SPEAKER_00
I have a family that s willing to call me out on my bullshit, as you talked to Ye about.
2
SPEAKER_00
I have friends who are able to do that.
2
SPEAKER_00
I try to have open lines of communications with people who I believe have my best interests at heart.
2
SPEAKER_00
conditions of being friends, that when you see me do something wrong, I d like for you to let me know that so I can correct it.
2
SPEAKER_00
I don t want to leave bad impressions out there.
2
SPEAKER_01
The sad thing about the internet, just looking at the critiques you get, I see very few critiques from people that actually want you to succeed, want you to grow.
2
SPEAKER_01
I mean, they re very, they re not sophisticated, they re just, they re, I don t know, they re cruel.
2
SPEAKER_01
The critiques are just, it s not actual critiques, it s just cruelty.
2
SPEAKER_00
And that s most of Twitter.
2
SPEAKER_00
I mean, Twitter is a place to
2
SPEAKER_00
To smack and be smacked.
2
SPEAKER_00
I mean that s the anybody who uses Twitter for a for an intellectual conversation I think is engaging in category error.
2
SPEAKER_00
I use it to spread love.
2
SPEAKER_00
I think it s the only one It s you it s you and no one else my friend.
2
SPEAKER_00
All right.
2
SPEAKER_01
Well on that topic.
2
SPEAKER_01
What do you think about Elon buying Twitter?
2
SPEAKER_01
What do you like?
2
SPEAKER_01
What are you hopeful on that front?
2
SPEAKER_01
What would you like to see Twitter improve?
2
SPEAKER_00
So I m very hopeful about Elon buying Twitter.
2
SPEAKER_00
I mean, I think that Elon is significantly more transparent than what has taken place up till now.
2
SPEAKER_00
He seems committed to the idea that he s going to broaden the Overton window to allow for conversations that simply were banned before, everything ranging from
2
SPEAKER_00
efficacy of masks with regard to COVID, to whether men can become women and all the rest.
2
SPEAKER_00
A lot of things that would get you banned on Twitter before without any sort of real explanation.
2
SPEAKER_00
It seems like he s dedicated to at least explaining what the standards are going to be and being broader and allowing a variety of perspectives on the outlet, which I think is wonderful.
2
SPEAKER_00
I think that s also why people are freaking out.
2
SPEAKER_00
I think the kind of wailing and gnashing of teeth and wearing of sackcloth and ash by so many members of the legacy media, I think a lot of that is because
2
SPEAKER_00
Twitter essentially was an oligarchy in which certain perspectives were allowed and certain perspectives just were not.
2
SPEAKER_00
And that was part of a broader social media reimposed oligarchy in the aftermath of 2017.
2
SPEAKER_00
So in order for, just to really understand, I think, what it means for Elon to take over Twitter, I think that we have to take a look at sort of the history of media in the United States in two minutes or less.
2
SPEAKER_00
the United States, the media for most of its existence up until about 1990, at least from about 1930s until the 1990s, virtually all media was three major television networks, a couple major newspapers and the wire services.
2
SPEAKER_00
Everybody had a local newspaper, the wire services that basically did all the foreign policy and all the national policy, McClatchy, Reuters, AP, AFP, etc.
2
SPEAKER_00
So that monopoly or oligopoly existed until the rise of the Internet.
2
SPEAKER_00
There were sort of pokes at it and talk radio and Fox News, but there certainly was not this plethora of sources.
2
SPEAKER_00
Then the Internet explodes and all of a sudden you can get news everywhere.
2
SPEAKER_00
And the way that people are accessing that news is
2
SPEAKER_00
You re, I believe, significantly younger than I am, but we used to do this thing called bookmarking, where you would bookmark a series of websites, and then you would visit them every morning.
2
SPEAKER_00
And then social media came up.
2
SPEAKER_01
Is this an AOL, or?
2
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, exactly.
2
SPEAKER_00
You had the dial up, and it was actually a can connected to a string.
2
SPEAKER_00
And you would actually just, it would go, ehh, ehh.
2
SPEAKER_00
And then there came a point where social media arose.
2
SPEAKER_00
And social media was sort of a boon for everybody, because you no longer had to bookmark anything.
2
SPEAKER_00
You just followed your favorite accounts, and all of them would pop up.
2
SPEAKER_00
and you follow everything on Facebook and it would all pop up and it was all centralized.
2
SPEAKER_00
And for a while, everybody was super happy because this was the brand new wave of the future, made everything super easy.
2
SPEAKER_00
Suddenly outlets like mine were able to see new eyeballs because it was all centralized in one place, right?
2
SPEAKER_00
You didn t have to do it through Google optimization.
2
SPEAKER_00
You could now just put it on Facebook and so many eyeballs were on Facebook, you d get more traffic.
2
SPEAKER_00
And everybody seemed pretty happy with this arrangement until precisely the moment Donald Trump became president.
2
SPEAKER_00
At that point, then the sort of pre-existing supposition of a lot of the powers that be, which was,
2
SPEAKER_00
Democrats are going to continue winning from here on out so we can sort of use the social media platforms as ways to push our information and still allow for there to be other information out there.
2
SPEAKER_00
The immediate response was we need to reestablish this siphoning of information.
2
SPEAKER_00
It was misinformation and disinformation that won Donald Trump the election.
2
SPEAKER_00
We need to pressure the social media companies to start cracking down on misinformation and disinformation.
2
SPEAKER_00
and actually see this in the historical record.
2
SPEAKER_00
I mean, you can see how Jack Dorsey s talk about free speech shifted from about 2015 to about 2018.
2
SPEAKER_00
You can see Mark Zuckerberg gave a speech at Georgetown in 2018 in which he talked about free speech and its value.
2
SPEAKER_00
And by 2019, he was going in front of Congress talking about how he was responsible for the stuff that was on Facebook, which is not true.
2
SPEAKER_00
He s not responsible for the stuff on Facebook, right?
2
SPEAKER_00
It s a platform.
2
SPEAKER_00
Is AT&T responsible for the stuff you say on your phone?
2
SPEAKER_00
The answer is typically no.
2
SPEAKER_00
So when that happened, all of these, because all the eyeballs had now been centralized in these social media sites,
2
SPEAKER_00
They were able to suddenly control what you could see and what you could not see.
2
SPEAKER_00
And the most obvious example was obviously leading up to 2020, the election that the killing of the Hunter Biden story is a great example of this.
2
SPEAKER_00
And so Elon coming in and taking over one of the social media services and saying, I m not playing by your rules, right?
2
SPEAKER_00
There s not going to be this sort of.
2
SPEAKER_00
group of people in the halls of power who are going to decide what we can see and hear.
2
SPEAKER_00
Instead, I m going to let a thousand flowers bloom.
2
SPEAKER_00
There will be limits, but it s going to be on a more case-by-case basis.
2
SPEAKER_00
We re going to allow perspectives that are mainstream, but maybe not mainstream in the halls of academia or in the halls of media.
2
SPEAKER_00
Let those be said.
2
SPEAKER_00
I think it s a really good thing.
2
SPEAKER_00
Now, that comes with, you know, some responsibilities on Anilan s personal part, which would be, you know, to be
2
SPEAKER_00
For example, I think more responsible in dissemination of information himself sometimes, right?
2
SPEAKER_00
Like he got himself in trouble the other day for tweeting out that story about Paul Pelosi that was speculative and untrue.
2
SPEAKER_00
And I don t think what he did is horrific.
2
SPEAKER_00
He deleted it when he found out that it was false.
2
SPEAKER_00
And that s actually free speech working, right?
2
SPEAKER_00
He said something wrong.
2
SPEAKER_00
People ripped into him.
2
SPEAKER_00
He realized he was wrong.
2
SPEAKER_00
He deleted it, which seems to me a better solution than preemptively banning content, which only raises more questions than it actually stops.
2
SPEAKER_00
With that said, as the face of responsible free speech, and that s sort of what he s pitching at Twitter, he I think should enact that himself and be a little more careful in the stuff that he tweets out.
2
SPEAKER_00
That s a tricky balance.
2
SPEAKER_01
The reason a lot of people are freaking out is because one, he s putting his thumb on the scale by saying he is more likely to vote Republican.
2
SPEAKER_01
he s showing himself to be center-right and sort of just having a political opinion versus being this amorphous thing that doesn t have a political opinion.
2
SPEAKER_01
I think if I were to guess, I haven t talked to him about it, but if I were to guess he s sending a kind of signal that s important for the Twitter, the company itself, because if we re being honest, most of the employees are left-leaning.
2
SPEAKER_01
So you have to kind of send a signal that
2
SPEAKER_01
like a resisting mechanism, to say like, since most of the employees are left, it s good for Elon to be more right to balance out the way the actual engineering is done, to say we re not going to do any kind of activism inside the engineering.
2
SPEAKER_01
If I were to guess, that s kind of the effective
2
SPEAKER_01
Aspect of that of that mechanism and the other one by posting the Pelosi thing is probably To expand the Overton window like saying we can play We could post stuff we could post conspiracy theories and then through discourse figure out what is and isn t true again Like I say, I mean, I think that the that is a better mechanism in action than what it was before I just think it gave people who hate his guts the opening to kind of slap him for for
2
SPEAKER_00
No reason, but I can see the strategy of it for sure.
2
SPEAKER_00
And I think that the general idea that he s kind of pushing right where the company had pushed left before, I think that there is actually unilateral polarization right now in politics, at least with regard to social media, in which one side basically says the solution to
2
SPEAKER_00
Disinformation is to shut down free speech from the other side.
2
SPEAKER_00
And the other side is basically like people like me are saying the solution to disinformation is to let a thousand like I d rather have people on the left also being able to put out stuff that I disagree with than for there to be anybody who s sort of in charge of these social media platforms and using them as editorial sites.
2
SPEAKER_00
I mean, I m not criticizing MSNBC for not putting on right wing opinions.
2
SPEAKER_00
I mean, that s fine.
2
SPEAKER_00
I run a conservative site.
2
SPEAKER_00
We re not going to put up left-wing opinions on a wide variety of issues because we are a conservative site.
2
SPEAKER_00
But if you pitch yourself as a platform, that s a different thing.
2
SPEAKER_00
If you pitch yourself as the town square, as Elon likes to call it, then I think Elon has a better idea of that than many of the former employees did, especially now that we have that report from The Intercept suggesting that there are people from Twitter working with DHS to monitor quote-unquote disinformation and being rather vague about what disinformation meant.
2
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, I don t think activism has a place in what is fundamentally an engineering company that s building a platform.
2
SPEAKER_01
Like the people inside the company should not be putting a thumb on the scale of what is and isn t allowed.
2
SPEAKER_01
You should create a mechanism for the people to decide what is and isn t allowed.
2
SPEAKER_01
Do you think Trump should have been removed from Twitter?
2
SPEAKER_01
Should his account be restored?
2
SPEAKER_00
His account should be restored.
2
SPEAKER_00
And this is coming from somebody who really dislikes an enormous number of Donald Trump s tweets.
2
SPEAKER_00
Again, he s a very important political personage.
2
SPEAKER_00
Even if he weren t, I don t think that he should be banned from Twitter or Facebook in coordinated fashion.
2
SPEAKER_00
By the way, I hold that opinion about people who I think are far worse than Donald Trump.
2
SPEAKER_00
Everyone knows I m not an Alex Jones guy.
2
SPEAKER_00
I don t like Alex Jones.
2
SPEAKER_00
I think Alex Jones pervades.
2
SPEAKER_01
I think Alex should be back on Twitter.
2
SPEAKER_00
I do, actually, because I think that there are plenty of people who are willing to say that what he s saying is wrong.
2
SPEAKER_00
And I m not a big fan of this idea that because people I disagree with, and people who have personally targeted me, by the way, I mean, Alex Jones has said some things about me personally that I m not real fond of.
2
SPEAKER_00
Well, we re not besties.
2
SPEAKER_00
No, it turns out.
2
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, you know, all I ve said is I don t really enjoy a show.
2
SPEAKER_00
He said some other stuff about the Antichrist and such, but that s it.
2
SPEAKER_00
That s a bit of a different thing, I suppose.
2
SPEAKER_00
You know, even so, you know, I m just not a big fan of this idea.
2
SPEAKER_00
Like I ve defended people who have really gone after me on a personal level, have targeted me that
2
SPEAKER_00
The town square is online.
2
SPEAKER_00
Banning people from the town square is unpersonning them.
2
SPEAKER_00
Unless you violated a criminal statute, you should not be unpersonned in American society, as a general rule.
2
SPEAKER_00
That doesn t mean that companies that are not platforms don t have the ability to respond to you.
2
SPEAKER_00
I think Adidas is right to terminate its contract with Kanye, for example, with Ye.
2
SPEAKER_00
You know, that s, but Twitter ain t Adidas.
2
SPEAKER_01
So the way your stance on free speech to the degree it s possible to achieve on a platform like Twitter is you fight bad speech with more speech, with better speech.
2
SPEAKER_01
So if Alex Jones and Trump is allowed back on,
2
SPEAKER_01
in the coming months and years leading up to the 2024 election, you think that s gonna make for a better world in the long term?
2
SPEAKER_00
I think that on the principle that people should be allowed to do this and the alternative being a group of thought bosses telling us what we can and cannot see, yes.
2
SPEAKER_00
Do I think in the short term it s gonna mean a lot of things that I don t like very much?
2
SPEAKER_00
Sure, I mean, that s, them s the cost of doing business, you know?
2
SPEAKER_00
Like, I think that one of the costs of freedom is people doing things that I don t particularly like.
2
SPEAKER_00
And I would prefer the freedom with all the stuff I don t like than not the freedom.
2
SPEAKER_01
Let me linger on the love a little bit.
2
SPEAKER_01
You and a lot of people are pretty snarky on Twitter, sometimes to the point of mockery, derision, even a bit of, if I were to say, bad faith in the kind of mockery.
2
SPEAKER_01
And you see it as a war.
2
SPEAKER_01
I disagree with both you and Elon on this.
2
SPEAKER_01
Elon sees Twitter as a war zone, or at least has saw it that way in the past.
2
SPEAKER_01
Have you ever considered being nicer on Twitter?
2
SPEAKER_01
As a voice that a lot of people look up to?
2
SPEAKER_01
That if Ben Shapiro...
2
SPEAKER_01
becomes a little bit more about love that s gonna inspire a lot of people?
2
SPEAKER_01
Or no?
2
SPEAKER_01
Is it just too fun for you?
2
SPEAKER_00
The answer is yes.
2
SPEAKER_00
Sure, it s occurred to me.
2
SPEAKER_00
Let s put it this way.
2
SPEAKER_00
There are a lot of tweets that actually don t go out that I delete.
2
SPEAKER_00
I ll say that Twitter s new function, that 30-second function, is a friend of mine.
2
SPEAKER_00
Every so often I ll tweet something and I ll think about it a second.
2
SPEAKER_00
Do I need to say this?
2
SPEAKER_00
Probably not.
2
SPEAKER_01
Can you make a book published after you pass away of all the tweets that you didn t send?
2
SPEAKER_00
Oh no, my kids are still gonna be around, I hope.
2
SPEAKER_00
So that s the legacy.
2
SPEAKER_00
But yeah, I mean, sure.
2
SPEAKER_00
The answer is yes.
2
SPEAKER_00
And this is a good piece of what we would call in Orthodox Judaism, Mussar.
2
SPEAKER_00
This is like, he s giving a Mussar schmooze right now.
2
SPEAKER_00
This is like the kind of be a better person stuff.
2
SPEAKER_00
I agree with you, I agree with you.
2
SPEAKER_00
And yeah, I will say that Twitter is sometimes too much fun.
2
SPEAKER_00
And I try to be at least, if not even handed, then equal opportunity in my derision.
2
SPEAKER_00
And I remember that during the 2016 primaries, I used to post rather snarky tweets about virtually all of the candidates, Republican and Democrat.
2
SPEAKER_00
And every so often, I ll still do some of that.
2
SPEAKER_00
I do think actually the amount of snark on my Twitter feed has gone down fairly significantly.
2
SPEAKER_00
I think if you go back a couple of years, it was probably a little more snarky.
2
SPEAKER_00
Today, I m trying to use it a little bit more in terms of strategy to get out information.
2
SPEAKER_00
Now, that doesn t mean I m not gonna make jokes about, for example, you know, Joe Biden.
2
SPEAKER_00
I will make jokes about Joe Biden.
2
SPEAKER_00
He s the President of the United States.
2
SPEAKER_00
Nobody else will mock him.
2
SPEAKER_00
So, the entire comedic establishment has decided they actually work for him.
2
SPEAKER_01
So, the President of the United States, no matter who they are, get the snark.
2
SPEAKER_00
Yes, yes.
2
SPEAKER_00
And President Trump, I think, is fairly aware that he got the snark from me as well.
2
SPEAKER_00
When it comes to snarking the president, I m not going to stop that.
2
SPEAKER_00
I think the president deserves to be snarked.
2
SPEAKER_01
So you re not afraid of attacking Trump?
2
SPEAKER_00
No, I mean, I ve done it before.
2
SPEAKER_01
Can you say what your favorite and least favorite things are about President Trump and President Biden one at a time?
2
SPEAKER_01
So maybe one thing that you can say is super positive about Trump and one thing super negative about Trump.
2
SPEAKER_00
Okay so the super positive thing about Trump is that because he has no preconceived views that are establishmentarian, he s sometimes willing to go out of the box and do things that haven t been tried before.
2
SPEAKER_00
And sometimes that works.
2
SPEAKER_00
I mean the best example being the entire foreign policy establishment telling him that
3
SPEAKER_00
he couldn t get a Middle Eastern deal done unless he centered the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and instead he just went right around that and ended up cutting a bunch of peace deals in the Middle East or moving the embassy in Jerusalem, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
Sometimes he does stuff and it s really out of the box and it actually works and that s kind of awesome in politics and neat to see.
3
SPEAKER_00
The downside of Trump is that he has no capacity to use any sort of
3
SPEAKER_00
There s no filter between brain and mouth.
3
SPEAKER_00
Whatever happens in his brain is the thing that comes out of his mouth.
3
SPEAKER_00
I know a lot of people find that charming and wonderful, and it is very funny, but I don t think that it is a particularly excellent personal quality in a person who has as much responsibility as President Trump has.
3
SPEAKER_00
I think he says a lot of damaging and bad things on Twitter.
3
SPEAKER_00
I think that he
3
SPEAKER_00
seems consumed in some ways by his own grievances, which is why you ve seen him focusing in on election 2020 so much.
3
SPEAKER_00
And I think that that is very negative about President Trump.
3
SPEAKER_00
So I m very grateful to President Trump as a conservative for many of the things that he did.
3
SPEAKER_00
I think that a lot of his personality issues are pretty severe.
3
SPEAKER_01
What about Joe Biden?
3
SPEAKER_00
So I think that the thing that I like most about Joe Biden, I will say that Biden, two things.
3
SPEAKER_00
One, Biden seems to be a very good father.
3
SPEAKER_00
By all available, by all available evidence, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
There are a lot of people who are put out, you know, kind of tape of him talking to Hunter and Hunter s having trouble with drugs or whatever.
3
SPEAKER_00
And I keep listening to that tape and thinking,
3
SPEAKER_00
he seems like a really good dad.
3
SPEAKER_00
Like the stuff that he s saying to his son is stuff that God forbid if that were happening with my kid, I d be saying to my kid.
3
SPEAKER_00
And so, you know, you can t help but feel for the guy.
3
SPEAKER_00
He s had an incredibly difficult go of it with his first wife and the death of members of his family and then Beau dying.
3
SPEAKER_00
I mean like that kind of stuff obviously is deeply sympathetic and his, you know, he seems like a deeply sympathetic father.
3
SPEAKER_00
As far as his politics,
3
SPEAKER_00
He seems like a slap on the back kind of guy and I don t mind that.
3
SPEAKER_00
I think that s nice so far as it goes.
3
SPEAKER_00
It s sort of an old school politics where things are done with handshake and personal relationships.
3
SPEAKER_00
The thing I don t like about him is I think sometimes that s really not genuine.
3
SPEAKER_00
I think that sometimes – I think that s his personal tendency but I think sometimes he allows the
3
SPEAKER_00
prevailing winds of his party to carry him to incredibly radical places, and then he just doubles down on the radicalism in some pretty disingenuous ways.
3
SPEAKER_00
And there I would cite the Independence Day speech or the Independence Hall speech, which I thought was truly one of the worst speeches I ve seen a president give.
3
SPEAKER_00
So you don t think he s trying to be a unifier in general?
3
SPEAKER_00
Not at all.
3
SPEAKER_00
I mean, that s what he was elected to do.
3
SPEAKER_00
He was elected to do two things, not be alive and be a unifier.
3
SPEAKER_00
Those were the two things.
3
SPEAKER_00
And when I say not be alive, I don t mean like physically dead.
3
SPEAKER_00
This is where the snark comes in.
3
SPEAKER_00
But what I do mean is that he was elected to not be particularly activist.
3
SPEAKER_00
Basically, the mandate was don t be Trump, be sane, don t be Trump, calm everything down.
3
SPEAKER_00
And instead he got in, he s like, what if we spend $7 trillion?
3
SPEAKER_00
What if we pull out of Afghanistan without any sort of plan?
3
SPEAKER_00
What if I start labeling all of my political enemies, enemies of the republic?
3
SPEAKER_00
What if I start
3
SPEAKER_00
bringing Dylan Mulvaney to the White House and talking about how it is a moral sin to prevent the general mutilation of minors.
3
SPEAKER_00
I mean, like, this kind of stuff is very radical stuff.
3
SPEAKER_00
And this is not a president who has pursued a unifying agenda, which is why his approval rating sank from 60% when he entered office to low 40s or high 30s today.
3
SPEAKER_00
Unlike President Trump, who never had a high approval rating, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
Trump came into office, and he had like a 45% approval rating.
3
SPEAKER_00
And when he left office, he had about a 43% approval rating.
3
SPEAKER_00
and bounced around between 45 and 37 pretty much his entire presidency.
3
SPEAKER_00
Biden went from being a very popular guy coming in to a very unpopular guy right now.
3
SPEAKER_00
And if you re Joe Biden, you should be looking in the mirror and wondering exactly why.
3
SPEAKER_01
Do you think that pulling out from Afghanistan could be flipped as a pro for Biden in terms of he actually did it?
3
SPEAKER_00
I think it s gonna be almost impossible.
3
SPEAKER_00
I think the American people are incredibly inconsistent about their own views on foreign policy.
3
SPEAKER_00
In other words, we like to be isolationist until it comes time for us to be defeated and humiliated.
3
SPEAKER_00
When that happens, we tend not to like it very much.
3
SPEAKER_01
You mentioned Biden being a good father.
3
SPEAKER_01
Can you make the case for and against the Hunter Biden laptop story for it being a big deal and against it being a big deal?
3
SPEAKER_00
Sure.
3
SPEAKER_00
So the case for it being a big deal is basically twofold.
3
SPEAKER_00
One is that it is clearly relevant if the president s son
3
SPEAKER_00
is running around to foreign countries picking up bags of cash because his last name is Biden while his father is vice president of the United States.
3
SPEAKER_00
And it raises questions as to influence peddling for either the vice president or the former vice president using political connections.
3
SPEAKER_00
Did he make any money?
3
SPEAKER_00
Who was the big guy?
3
SPEAKER_00
Right.
3
SPEAKER_00
All these open questions that obviously implicates
3
SPEAKER_00
you know, the questions to be asked.
3
SPEAKER_00
And then the secondary reason that the story is big is actually because of the reaction of the story.
3
SPEAKER_00
The banning of the story is in and of itself a major story.
3
SPEAKER_00
If there s any story that implicates a presidential candidate in the last month of an election and there is a media blackout, including a social media blackout, that obviously raises some very serious questions about informational flow and dissemination in the United States.
3
SPEAKER_01
So no matter how big of a deal the story is, it is a big deal that there s a censorship of any relevant story.
3
SPEAKER_00
When there s a coordinated collusive blackout, yeah, that s a serious and major problem.
3
SPEAKER_00
So those are the two reasons why it would be a big story.
3
SPEAKER_00
The two reasons, a reason why it would not be a big story, perhaps, is if it turns out, and we don t really know this yet, but let s say that Hunter Biden was basically
3
SPEAKER_00
off on his own doing what he was doing, being a derelict or a drug addict or acting badly, and his dad had nothing to do with it, and Joe was telling the truth.
3
SPEAKER_00
But the problem is we never actually got those questions answered.
3
SPEAKER_00
So if it had turned out to be a nothing of a story, the nice thing about stories that turn out to be nothing is that after they turn out to be nothing, they re nothing.
3
SPEAKER_00
The biggest problem with this story is that it wasn t allowed to take the normal life
3
SPEAKER_00
cycle of a story, which is original story breaks, follow on questions are asked, follow on questions are answered.
3
SPEAKER_00
Story is either now a big story or it s nothing.
3
SPEAKER_00
When the life cycle of a story is cut off right at the very beginning, right when it s born, then that allows you to speculate in any direction you want.
3
SPEAKER_00
You can speculate, it means nothing, it s nonsense, it s Russian, it s a Russian laptop, it s disinformation.
3
SPEAKER_00
Or on the other hand, this means that Joe Biden was personally calling Hunter and telling him to pick up a stack of cash over in Beijing, and then he became president and he s influence peddling.
3
SPEAKER_00
So this is why it s important to allow these stories to go forward.
3
SPEAKER_00
So this is why actually the bigger story for the moment is not the laptop.
3
SPEAKER_00
It s the reaction to the laptop because it cut off that life cycle of the story.
3
SPEAKER_00
And then, you know, at some point, I would assume that there will be some follow on questions that are actually answered.
3
SPEAKER_00
I mean, the House is pledging if it goes Republican to investigate all of this.
3
SPEAKER_00
Again, I wouldn t be supremely surprised if it turns out that that there was no direct involvement of Joe in this sort of stuff, because it turns out, as I said before, that all of politics is veep.
3
SPEAKER_00
And this is always the story with half the scandals that you see, is that everybody assumes that there s some sort of deep and abiding clever plan that some politician is implementing it.
3
SPEAKER_00
And then you look at it and it turns out, no, it s just something dumb, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
This is sort of a perfect example of this, you know, President Trump with the classified documents in Mar-a-Lago.
3
SPEAKER_00
So people on the left are like, it s probably nuclear codes.
3
SPEAKER_00
Probably he s taking secret documents and selling them to the Russians or the Chinese.
3
SPEAKER_00
And the real most obvious explanation is Trump looked at the papers and he said, I like these papers.
3
SPEAKER_00
And then he just decided to keep them.
3
SPEAKER_00
And then people came to him and said, Mr. President, you re not allowed to keep those papers.
3
SPEAKER_00
He said, who are those people?
3
SPEAKER_00
I don t care about what they have to say.
3
SPEAKER_00
I m putting them in the other room in a box.
3
SPEAKER_00
It is highly likely that that is what happened and it s very disappointing to people I think when they realize the human brain, I mean you know this better than I do, but the human brain is built to find patterns, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
It s what we like to do.
3
SPEAKER_00
We like to find plans and patterns because this is how we survived in the wild is you found a plan, you found a pattern, you cracked the code of the universe.
3
SPEAKER_00
When it comes to politics, the conspiracy theories that we see so often, it s largely because we re seeing inexplicable events.
3
SPEAKER_00
Unless you just assume everyone s a moron.
3
SPEAKER_00
If you assume that there s a lot of stupidity going on, everything becomes quickly explicable.
3
SPEAKER_00
If you assume that there must be some rationale behind it, you have to come up with increasingly convoluted conspiracy theories to explain just why people are acting the way that they re acting.
3
SPEAKER_00
And I find that, I won t say 100% of the time, but 94% of the time, the conspiracy theory turns out just to be people being dumb, and then other people reacting in dumb ways to the original people being dumb.
3
SPEAKER_01
But it s also, to me in that same way, very possible, very likely that Hunter Biden getting money in Ukraine, I guess, for consulting and all that kind of stuff is a nothing burger.
3
SPEAKER_01
He s qualified, he s getting money as he should.
3
SPEAKER_01
There s a lot of influence peddling in general that s not corrupt.
3
SPEAKER_00
I think the most obvious explanation there probably is that he wasn t
3
SPEAKER_00
Fake influence peddling, meaning he went to Ukraine and he s like, guess what?
3
SPEAKER_00
My dad s Joe.
3
SPEAKER_00
And they re like, well, you don t have any qualifications in oil and natural gas and you don t really have a great resume, but your dad is Joe.
3
SPEAKER_00
And then that was kind of the end of it.
3
SPEAKER_00
They gave him a bag of cash, hoping he would do something.
3
SPEAKER_00
He never did anything.
3
SPEAKER_01
I think you re making it sound worse than it is.
3
SPEAKER_01
I think that in general, consulting is done in that way.
3
SPEAKER_01
Your name, it s not like you re- I agree with you.
3
SPEAKER_01
You re not, it s not like he is some rare case and this is an illustration of corruption.
3
SPEAKER_01
If you can criticize consulting, which I would, which they re basically not providing, you look at a resume and who s who, like if you went to Harvard, I can criticize the same thing.
3
SPEAKER_01
If you have Harvard on your resume,
3
SPEAKER_01
you re more likely to be hired as a consultant.
3
SPEAKER_01
Maybe there s a network there of people that you know, and you hire them in that same way.
3
SPEAKER_01
If your last name is Biden, if you re last, there s a lot of last names that sound pretty good at it, right?
3
SPEAKER_01
For sure, for sure.
3
SPEAKER_00
And Biden admitted that much, by the way, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
In an open interview, he was like, if your last name weren t Biden, wouldn t you have got that job?
3
SPEAKER_00
And he s like, probably not.
3
SPEAKER_00
And you re right.
3
SPEAKER_00
I agree with you.
3
SPEAKER_01
It s not like he s getting a ridiculous amount of money.
3
SPEAKER_01
He was getting like a pretty standard consulting kind of money, which also would criticize, because they get a ridiculous amount of money.
3
SPEAKER_01
But sort of even to push back on the life cycle, or to steel man the side that was concerned about the Hunter Biden laptop story, I don t know if there is a natural life cycle of a story, because there s something about the virality of the internet
3
SPEAKER_01
that we can t predict, that a story can just take hold, and the conspiracy around it builds, especially around politics, where the interpretation, some popular, sexy interpretation of a story that might not be connected to reality at all will become viral.
3
SPEAKER_01
And that, from Facebook s perspective, is probably what they re worried about, is a organized misinformation campaign.
3
SPEAKER_01
that makes up a sexy story or sexy interpretation of the vague story that we have, and that has an influence on the populace.
3
SPEAKER_00
I mean, I think that s true, but I think the question becomes who s the great adjudicator there, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
Who adjudicates when the story ought to be allowed to go through even a bad life cycle or allowed to go viral as opposed to not?
3
SPEAKER_00
Now, it s one thing if you want to say, okay, we can spot the Russian accounts that are actually promoting this stuff.
3
SPEAKER_00
They belong to the Russian government.
3
SPEAKER_00
Got to shut that down.
3
SPEAKER_00
I think everybody agrees.
3
SPEAKER_00
This is actually one of the slides that s happened linguistically that I really object to, is the slide between disinformation and misinformation.
3
SPEAKER_00
You notice there is this evolution.
3
SPEAKER_00
In 2017, there s a lot of talk about disinformation.
3
SPEAKER_00
It was Russian disinformation.
3
SPEAKER_00
The Russians were putting out deliberately false information in order to skew election results was the accusation.
3
SPEAKER_00
And then people started using disinformation or misinformation.
3
SPEAKER_00
And misinformation is either mistaken information or information that is quote-unquote out of context.
3
SPEAKER_00
That becomes very subjective very quickly as to what out of context means.
3
SPEAKER_00
And it doesn t necessarily have to be from a foreign source.
3
SPEAKER_00
It can be from a domestic source, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
It could be somebody misinterpreting something here.
3
SPEAKER_00
It could be somebody interpreting something correctly, but PolitiFact thinks that it s out of context.
3
SPEAKER_00
And that sort of stuff gets very murky very quickly.
3
SPEAKER_00
And so I m deeply uncomfortable with the idea that Facebook I mean, Zuckerberg was was on with Rogan and talking about how, you know, the FBI had basically set lookout for Russian interference in the election.
3
SPEAKER_00
And then all of these people were out there saying that the laptop was Russian disinformation.
3
SPEAKER_00
So he basically shut it down.
3
SPEAKER_00
That sort of stuff is frightening, especially because it wasn t Russian disinformation.
3
SPEAKER_00
I mean, the laptop was real.
3
SPEAKER_00
And so the the fact that
3
SPEAKER_00
You have people who seem to, let s put it this way, it seems as though, maybe this is wrong, it seems as though when a story gets killed preemptively like this, it is almost universally a story that negatively affects one side of the political aisle.
3
SPEAKER_00
I can t remember the last time there s a story
3
SPEAKER_00
on the right that was disinformation or misinformation where social media stepped in and they went, we cannot have this.
3
SPEAKER_00
This cannot be distributed.
3
SPEAKER_00
We re going to all colludes that this information is not distributed.
3
SPEAKER_00
Maybe in response to the story being proved false, it gets taken down.
3
SPEAKER_00
But what made the Hunter Biden thing so amazing is that it wasn t really even a response to anything.
3
SPEAKER_00
It was like the story got posted.
3
SPEAKER_00
There were no actual doubts expressed.
3
SPEAKER_00
as to the verified falsity of the story.
3
SPEAKER_00
It was just supposition that it had to be false and everybody jumped in.
3
SPEAKER_00
So I think that confirmed a lot of the conspiracy theories people had about social media and how it works.
3
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, so if the reason you want to slow down the viral spread of a thing is at all grounded in partisanship, that s a problem.
3
SPEAKER_01
Like you should be very honest with yourself and ask yourself that question.
3
SPEAKER_01
Is it because I m on the left or on the right that I want to slow this down?
3
SPEAKER_01
Versus is it hate?
3
SPEAKER_01
bipartisan hate speech, right?
3
SPEAKER_01
But it s really tricky.
3
SPEAKER_01
But like you, I m very uncomfortable in general with any kind of slowing down, with any kind of censorship.
3
SPEAKER_01
But if there is something like a conspiracy theory that spreads hate, that becomes viral,
3
SPEAKER_01
I still lean to let that conspiracy theory spread, because the alternative is dangerous, more dangerous.
3
SPEAKER_00
It s sort of like the ring of power, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
Like everybody wants the ring, because with the ring you can stop the bad guys from going forward, but it turns out that the ring gives you enormous power, and that power can be used in the wrong ways too.
3
SPEAKER_01
You head The Daily Wire, which I m a member of.
3
SPEAKER_01
I appreciate that, thank you.
3
SPEAKER_01
I recommend everybody sign up to it.
3
SPEAKER_01
It should be part of your regular diet, whether you re on the left and the right, the far left or the far right.
3
SPEAKER_01
Everybody should be part of your regular diet.
3
SPEAKER_01
Okay, that said,
3
SPEAKER_01
do you worry about the audience capture aspect of it?
3
SPEAKER_01
Because it is a platform for conservatives and you have a powerful voice on there.
3
SPEAKER_01
It might be difficult for you to go against the talking points or against the stream of ideas that is usually connected to conservative thought.
3
SPEAKER_01
Do you worry about that?
3
SPEAKER_00
I mean, the audience would obviously be upset with me and would have a right to be upset with me if I suddenly flipped all my positions on a dime.
3
SPEAKER_00
I have enough faith in my audience that I can say things that I think are true and that may disagree with the audience.
3
SPEAKER_00
you know, on a fairly regular basis, I would say.
3
SPEAKER_00
But they understand that on the deeper principle, we re on the same side of the aisle, at least I hope that much, from the audience.
3
SPEAKER_00
It s also why we provide a number of different views on the platforms, many of which I disagree with, but are sort of within the generalized range of conservative thought.
3
SPEAKER_00
You know, it s something I do have to think about every day, though, yeah.
3
SPEAKER_00
I mean, you have to think about, like, am I saying this because I m afraid of taking off my audience, or am I saying this because I actually believe this?
3
SPEAKER_00
And, you know, that s a delicate dance a little bit.
3
SPEAKER_00
You have to be sort of honest with yourself.
3
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, somebody like Sam Harris is pretty good at this, at fighting, at saying the most outrageous thing that he knows, he almost leans into it.
3
SPEAKER_01
He knows he ll piss off a lot of his audience.
3
SPEAKER_01
Sometimes you almost have to test the system.
3
SPEAKER_01
It s like if you feel, you almost exaggerate your feelings just to make sure to send a signal to the audience that you re not captured by them.
3
SPEAKER_01
So speaking of people you disagree with,
3
SPEAKER_01
What is your favorite thing about Candace Owens?
3
SPEAKER_01
And what is one thing you disagree with her on?
3
SPEAKER_00
Well, my favorite thing about Candace is that she will say things that nobody else will say.
3
SPEAKER_00
My least favorite thing about Candace is that she will say things that nobody else will say.
3
SPEAKER_00
I mean, listen, she says things that are audacious and I think need to be said sometimes.
3
SPEAKER_00
Sometimes I think that she is morally wrong.
3
SPEAKER_00
I think the way she responded to Kanye, I ve said this clearly, was dead wrong and morally wrong.
3
SPEAKER_01
What was her response?
3
SPEAKER_00
Her original response was that she proffered confusion of what Ye was actually talking about.
3
SPEAKER_00
And then she, you know, was defending her friend.
3
SPEAKER_00
I wish that the way that she had responded was by saying, he s my friend.
3
SPEAKER_00
And also, he said something bad and anti-Semitic.
3
SPEAKER_00
I wish that she had said that.
3
SPEAKER_00
And so right away, right away.
3
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, I think you can also
3
SPEAKER_01
This is the interesting human thing.
3
SPEAKER_01
You can be friends with people that you disagree with, and you can be friends with people that actually say hateful stuff.
3
SPEAKER_01
And one of the ways to help alleviate hate is being friends with people that say hateful things.
3
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, and then calling them out on a personal level when they do say wrong or hateful things.
3
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, from a place of love and respect and privately.
3
SPEAKER_00
Privately is also a big thing, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
I mean, like the public demand for, you know, denunciation from friends to friends is difficult.
3
SPEAKER_00
And I certainly have compassion for Candace, given the fact that she s so close with you.
3
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, it breaks my heart sometimes, the public fights between friends and broken friendships.
3
SPEAKER_01
I ve seen quite a few friendships publicly break over COVID.
3
SPEAKER_01
COVID made people behave their worst in many cases,
4
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, it breaks my heart a little bit.
4
SPEAKER_00
Because like the human connection is a prerequisite for effective debate and discussion and battles over ideas.
4
SPEAKER_00
Has there been any argument from the opposite political aisle that has made you change your mind about something?
4
SPEAKER_00
If you if you look back?
4
SPEAKER_01
So I will say that the
4
SPEAKER_01
I m thinking it through because I think that my views probably on foreign policy have morphed somewhat.
4
SPEAKER_01
I would say that I was much more interventionist when I was younger.
4
SPEAKER_01
I m significantly less interventionist now.
4
SPEAKER_01
I d probably put myself... You give an example?
4
SPEAKER_01
Sure.
4
SPEAKER_01
I was a big backer of the Iraq War.
4
SPEAKER_01
I think now in retrospect, I might not be a backer of the Iraq War if the same situation arose again, based on the amount of evidence that had been presented or based on the sort of willingness of the American public to go at it.
4
SPEAKER_01
If you re going to get involved in a war, you have to know what the end point looks like, and you have to know what the American people really are willing to bear, and the American people are not willing to bear open-ended occupations.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so knowing that, you have to consider that going in.
4
SPEAKER_01
So on foreign policy, I ve become a lot more of a, it s almost Henry Kissinger realist in some ways.
4
SPEAKER_01
And when it comes to
4
SPEAKER_01
Social policy, I would say that I m fairly strong where I was.
4
SPEAKER_01
I may have become slightly convinced actually by more of the conservative side of the aisle on things like drug legalization.
4
SPEAKER_01
I think when I was younger, I was much more pro-drug legalization than I am now, at least on the local level.
4
SPEAKER_01
On a federal level, I think the federal government can t really do much other than close the borders with regard to fentanyl trafficking, for example.
4
SPEAKER_01
But when it comes to how drugs were in local communities, you can see how drugs were in local communities pretty easily.
4
SPEAKER_00
which is weird because I saw you smoke a joint right before this conversation.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s my biggest thing.
4
SPEAKER_01
I mean, I try to keep that secret.
4
SPEAKER_00
All right.
4
SPEAKER_00
Well, that s interesting about intervention.
4
SPEAKER_00
Can you comment about the war in Ukraine?
4
SPEAKER_00
So for me, it s a deeply personal thing, but I think you re able to look at it from a geopolitics perspective.
4
SPEAKER_00
What is the role of the United States in this conflict, before the conflict, during the conflict, and right now in helping achieve peace?
4
SPEAKER_01
I think before the conflict, the big problem is that the West took almost the worst possible view, which was encourage Ukraine to keep trying to join NATO and the EU, but don t let them in.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so what that does is it achieves the purpose of getting Russia really, really, really ticked off and feeling threatened, but also does not give any of the protections of NATO or the EU to Ukraine.
4
SPEAKER_01
I mean, Zelensky is on film when he was a comedy actor making that exact joke, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
He has Merkel on the other line and she s like, oh, welcome to the – welcome to NATO.
4
SPEAKER_01
And he s like, great.
4
SPEAKER_01
She s like, wait, is this Ukraine on the line?
4
SPEAKER_01
Oops.
4
SPEAKER_01
But so that sort of policy is sort of nonsensical.
4
SPEAKER_01
If you re going to offer alliance to somebody, offer alliance to them.
4
SPEAKER_01
And if you re going to guarantee their security, guarantee their security.
4
SPEAKER_01
And the West failed signally to do that.
4
SPEAKER_01
So that was mistakes in the run up to the war.
4
SPEAKER_01
Once the war began, then the responsibility of the West began and became to give Ukraine as much material as is necessary to repel the invasion.
4
SPEAKER_01
And the West did really well with that.
4
SPEAKER_01
I think we were late on the ball in the United States, it seemed like Europe led the way a little bit more than the United States did there.
4
SPEAKER_01
But in terms of
4
SPEAKER_01
effectuating American interests in the region, which being an American is what I m chiefly concerned about.
4
SPEAKER_01
And the American interests were several fold.
4
SPEAKER_01
One is preserve borders.
4
SPEAKER_01
Two is degrade the Russian aggressive military because Russia s military has been aggressive.
4
SPEAKER_01
And they are geopolitical rival of the United States.
4
SPEAKER_01
Three, recalibrate the European balance with China.
4
SPEAKER_01
Europe was sort of balancing with Russia and China.
4
SPEAKER_01
And then because of the war, they sort of rebalanced away from China and Russia, which is a real geostrategic opportunity.
4
SPEAKER_01
for the United States, it seemed like most of those goals have already been achieved at this point for the United States.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so then the question becomes, what s the off ramp here?
4
SPEAKER_01
And what is the thing you re trying to prevent?
4
SPEAKER_01
So what s the best opportunity?
4
SPEAKER_01
What s the best case scenario?
4
SPEAKER_01
What s the worst case scenario?
4
SPEAKER_01
And then what s realistic?
4
SPEAKER_01
So best case scenario is Ukraine forces Russia entirely out of Ukraine, including Luhansk, Donetsk, and Crimea, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
That s the best case scenario.
4
SPEAKER_01
Virtually no one thinks that s accomplishable, including the United States, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
The White House has basically said as much.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s still cool to imagine, particularly Crimea, the Russians being forced out of Crimea.
4
SPEAKER_01
The Ukrainians have been successful in pushing the Russians out of certain parts of Luhansk and Donetsk, but the idea they re going to be able to push the entire Russian army completely back to the Russian borders,
4
SPEAKER_01
And that would be, at best, a very, very long and difficult slog in the middle of a collapsing Ukrainian economy, which is a point that Zelensky has made.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s like it s not enough for you guys to give us military aid.
4
SPEAKER_01
We re in the middle of a war.
4
SPEAKER_01
We re going to need economic aid as well.
4
SPEAKER_01
So it s a pretty open-ended and strong commitment.
4
SPEAKER_00
Can I take a small tangent on that?
4
SPEAKER_00
Sure.
4
SPEAKER_00
Best case scenario, if that does militarily happen, including Crimea, do you think there s a world in which Vladimir Putin would
4
SPEAKER_00
be able to convince the Russian people that this was a good conclusion to the war.
4
SPEAKER_01
Right.
4
SPEAKER_01
So the problem is that the best case scenario might also be the worst case scenario, meaning that there are a couple of scenarios that are sort of the worst case scenario, and this is sort of the puzzlement of the situation.
4
SPEAKER_01
One is that Putin feels so boxed in, so unable to go back to his own people and say, we just wasted tens of thousands of lives here for no reason, that he unleashes a tactical
4
SPEAKER_01
nuclear weapon on the battlefield.
4
SPEAKER_01
Nobody knows what happens after that.
4
SPEAKER_01
So we put NATO planes in the air to take out Russian assets.
4
SPEAKER_01
Do Russians start shooting down planes?
4
SPEAKER_01
Does Russia then threatened to escalate even further by attacking an actual NATO civilian center or or even Ukrainian civilian center with nuclear weapons?
4
SPEAKER_01
Like where it goes from there?
4
SPEAKER_01
Nobody knows because nuclear weapons haven t been used since 1945.
4
SPEAKER_01
So that is a worst case scenario.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s an unpredictable scenario that could devolve into really, really significant problems.
4
SPEAKER_01
The other worst case scenario, could be a best case scenario, could be a worst, we just don t know, is Putin falls.
4
SPEAKER_01
What happens after that?
4
SPEAKER_01
Who takes over for Putin?
4
SPEAKER_01
Is that person more moderate than Putin?
4
SPEAKER_01
Is that person a liberalizer?
4
SPEAKER_01
It probably won t be Navalny.
4
SPEAKER_01
If he s gonna be ousted, it ll probably somebody who s a top member of Putin s brass right now and has capacity to control the military.
4
SPEAKER_01
Or it s possible the entire regime breaks down and what you end up with is Syria in Russia, where you just have an entirely out of control region with no centralizing power, which is also a disaster area.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so in the nature of risk mitigation, in sort of an attempt at risk mitigation, what actually should be happening right now
4
SPEAKER_01
is some off-ramp has to be offered to Putin.
4
SPEAKER_01
The off-ramp likely is going to be him maintaining Crimea and parts of Luhansk and Donetsk.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s probably gonna be a commitment by Ukraine not to join NATO formally, but a guarantee by the West to defend Ukraine in case of an invasion of its borders again.
4
SPEAKER_01
by Russia like an actual treaty obligation, not like the BS treaty obligation when Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons in the 90s.
4
SPEAKER_01
And that is likely how this is going to have to go.
4
SPEAKER_01
The problem is that requires political courage, not from Zelensky.
4
SPEAKER_01
It requires courage from probably Biden.
4
SPEAKER_01
because the only... Zelensky s not in a political position where he can go back to his own people who have made unbelievable sacrifices on behalf of their nation and freedom and say to them, guys, now I m calling it quits.
4
SPEAKER_01
We re going to have to give them a hands-to-necks and give Putin an offer.
4
SPEAKER_01
I don t think that s an acceptable answer to most Ukrainians at this point in time from the polling data and from the available data we have on the ground.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s going to actually take Biden biting the bullet and being the bad guy and saying to Zelensky, listen,
4
SPEAKER_01
We ve made a commitment of material aid.
4
SPEAKER_01
We re offering you all these things, including essentially a defense pact.
4
SPEAKER_01
We re offering you all this stuff, but if you don t come to the table, then we re going to have to start weaning you off.
4
SPEAKER_01
Like, there will have to be a stick there.
4
SPEAKER_01
It can t just be a carrot.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so that will allow Zelensky, if Biden were to do that, it would allow Zelensky to blame Biden for the solution everybody knows has to happen.
4
SPEAKER_01
Zelensky can go back to his own people and he can say, listen,
4
SPEAKER_01
this is the way it has to go.
4
SPEAKER_01
Like, I don t want it to go this way, but it s not my, I m signing other people s checks, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
I mean, like, this is, it s not my money.
4
SPEAKER_01
And Biden would take the hit because he wouldn t then be able to blame Ukraine for whatever happens next, which has been the easy road off, I think, for a lot of politicians in the West is for them to just say, well, this is up to the Ukrainians to decide.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s up to the Ukrainians to decide.
4
SPEAKER_01
Well, is it totally up to the Ukrainians to decide?
4
SPEAKER_01
Because it seems like the West is signing an awful lot of checks and all of Europe is going to freeze this winter.
4
SPEAKER_00
So this is the importance of great leadership, by the way.
4
SPEAKER_00
That s why the people we elect is very important.
4
SPEAKER_00
do you think there s power to just one-on-one conversation where Biden sits down with Zelensky and Biden sits down with Putin almost in person?
4
SPEAKER_00
Or maybe I m romanticizing the notion, but having done these podcasts in person, I think there s something fundamentally different than through a remote call and also like a distant kind of recorded political type speak versus like man-to-man.
4
SPEAKER_01
So I m deeply afraid that Putin outplays people in the one-on-one scenarios because he s done it to multiple presidents already.
4
SPEAKER_01
He gets in one-on-one scenarios with Bush, with Obama, with Trump, with Biden, and he seems to be a very canny operator and a very sort of hard-nosed operator in those situations.
4
SPEAKER_01
I think that if you were going to do something like that, like an actual political face-to-face summit, what you would need is for Biden to first have a conversation with Zelensky, where Zelensky knows what s going on, so he s aware.
4
SPEAKER_01
And then Biden walks in and he says to Putin on camera, here s the offer.
4
SPEAKER_01
Let s get it together.
4
SPEAKER_01
Let s make peace.
4
SPEAKER_01
you get to keep this stuff, and then let Putin respond how Putin is going to respond.
4
SPEAKER_01
But, you know, the big problem for Putin, I think, and the problem with public-facing fora, maybe it s a private meeting.
4
SPEAKER_01
If it s a private meeting, maybe that s the best thing.
4
SPEAKER_01
If it s a public-facing forum, I think it s a problem because Putin s afraid of being humiliated at this point.
4
SPEAKER_01
If it s a private meeting, then sure, except that, again, I just, I wonder whether
4
SPEAKER_01
when it comes to a person as canny as Putin and to a politician that I really don t think is a particularly sophisticated player in Joe Biden.
4
SPEAKER_01
And again, this is not unique to Biden.
4
SPEAKER_01
I think that most of our presidents for the last 30, 40 years have not been particularly sophisticated players.
4
SPEAKER_01
I think that that s a risky scenario.
4
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, I still believe in the power of that because otherwise,
4
SPEAKER_00
I don t know, I don t think stuff on paper and political speak will solve these kinds of problems, because from Zelensky s perspective, nothing but complete victory will do.
4
SPEAKER_00
As a nation, his people sacrificed way too much, and they re all in.
4
SPEAKER_00
And if you look at, because I traveled to Ukraine, I spent time there, I ll be going back there, hopefully also going back to Russia.
4
SPEAKER_00
Just speaking to Ukrainians, they re all in, they re all in.
4
SPEAKER_00
nothing but complete victory.
4
SPEAKER_00
And so for that, the only way to achieve peace is through like honest human to human conversation, giving both people a way to off-ramp, to walk away victorious.
4
SPEAKER_00
And some of that requires
4
SPEAKER_00
speaking honestly as a human being, but also for America to, actually not even America, honestly, just the president, be able to eat their own ego a bit and be the punching bag a little, just enough for both presidents to be able to walk away and say, listen, we got the American president to come to us.
4
SPEAKER_00
And I think that makes the president look strong, not weak.
4
SPEAKER_01
I mean, I agree with you.
4
SPEAKER_01
I think it would also require some people on the right, people like me, if it s Joe Biden, to say, if Biden does that, I see what he s doing and it s the right move.
4
SPEAKER_01
I think one of the things that he s afraid of, to steel man him, I think one of the things he s afraid of is he goes and he makes that sort of deal and the right says, you just coward in front of Russia, you just gave away Ukraine, whatever it is.
4
SPEAKER_01
But, you know, it s going to require some people on the right to say that that move is the right move and then hold by it if Biden actually performs that move.
4
SPEAKER_00
You re exceptionally good at debate.
4
SPEAKER_00
You wrote how to debate leftists and destroy them.
4
SPEAKER_00
You re kind of known for this kind of stuff, just exceptionally skilled at conversation and debate and getting to the facts of the matter and using logic to get to the conclusion in the debate.
4
SPEAKER_00
Do you ever worry that this power, we talked about the ring.
4
SPEAKER_00
this power you were given has corrupted you and your ability to pursue the truth versus just winning debates?
4
SPEAKER_01
I hope not.
4
SPEAKER_01
I mean, so I think one of the things that s kind of funny about the branding versus the reality is that most of the things that get characterized as destroying in debates with facts and logic, most of those things are basically me having a conversation with somebody on a college campus,
4
SPEAKER_01
It actually isn t like a formal debate where we sit there and we critique each other s positions or it s not me insulting anybody.
4
SPEAKER_01
A lot of the clips that have gone very viral is me making an argument and then there not being like an amazing counter argument.
4
SPEAKER_01
Many of the debates that I ve held have been extremely cordial.
4
SPEAKER_01
Let s take the latest example.
4
SPEAKER_01
Like about a year ago, I debated Anna Kasparian from Young Turks.
4
SPEAKER_01
It was very cordial.
4
SPEAKER_01
It was very nice, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
That s sort of the way that I like to debate.
4
SPEAKER_01
My rule when it comes to debate and or discussion is that my opponent actually gets to pick the mode in which we work.
4
SPEAKER_01
So if it s going to be a debate of ideas and we re just going to discuss and critique and clarify, then we can do that.
4
SPEAKER_01
If somebody comes loaded for bear, then I will
4
SPEAKER_01
respond in kind.
4
SPEAKER_01
Because one of the big problems, I think, in sort of the debate slash discussion sphere, is very often misdiagnosis of what exactly is going on people who think that a discussion is a bait and vice versa.
4
SPEAKER_01
And that can be a real problem.
4
SPEAKER_01
And there are people who will, you know, treat what ought to be a discussion as for example, an exercise in performance art.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so what that is, is mugging or trolling or saying trolly things in order to just get to the like, that s something I actually don t do during debate.
4
SPEAKER_01
I mean, if you actually watch me talk to people, I don t actually do the trolling thing.
4
SPEAKER_01
The trolling thing is almost solely relegated to Twitter and me making jokes on my show.
4
SPEAKER_01
When it comes to actually debating people that
4
SPEAKER_01
Sounds actually a lot like what we re doing right now.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s just the person maybe taking just an obverse position to mine.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so that s fine.
4
SPEAKER_01
Usually half of the debate or discussion is me just asking for clarification of terms.
4
SPEAKER_01
Like what exactly do you mean by this so I can drill down on where the actual disagreement may lie?
4
SPEAKER_01
Because some of the time people think they re disagreeing and they re actually not disagreeing.
4
SPEAKER_01
When I m talking with Anna Kasparian and she s talking about how corporate and government have too much power together, I m like, well, you sound like a tea party.
4
SPEAKER_01
You and I are on the same page about that.
4
SPEAKER_01
That sort of stuff does tend to happen a lot in discussion.
4
SPEAKER_01
I think that when discussion gets termed debate, it s a problem.
4
SPEAKER_01
When debate gets termed discussion, it s even more problematic because debate is a different thing.
4
SPEAKER_00
And I find that your debate and your conversation is often in good faith, you re able to steal men on the other side, you re able to, you re actually listening, you re considering the other side.
4
SPEAKER_00
The times when I see that Ben Shapiro destroys leftists, it s usually just like you said, the other side is doing the trolling.
4
SPEAKER_00
Because they ve, I mean the people that do criticize you,
4
SPEAKER_00
for that interaction is the people that usually get destroyed are like 20 years old.
4
SPEAKER_00
And they re usually not sophisticated in any kind of degree in terms of being able to use logic and reason and facts and so on.
4
SPEAKER_01
And that s totally fine, by the way.
4
SPEAKER_01
I mean, if people want to criticize me for speaking on college campuses where a lot of political conversation happens, both right and left, that s fine.
4
SPEAKER_01
I mean, I ve had lots of conversations with people on the other side of the aisle, too.
4
SPEAKER_01
I mean, right, I ve done podcasts with Sam Harris and we ve talked about atheism or I ve done
4
SPEAKER_01
debates with Anna Kasparian, or I ve done a debate with Cenk Uygur, or I ve had conversations with lots of people on the other side of the aisle.
4
SPEAKER_01
In fact, I believe I m the only person on the right who recommends that people listen to his shows on the other side of the aisle, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
I mean, I say on my show on a fairly regular basis that people should listen to Positive America.
4
SPEAKER_01
Now, no one on Positive America will ever say that somebody should listen to my show.
4
SPEAKER_01
That is verboten.
4
SPEAKER_01
That is not something that can be had.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s one of the strangenesses of our politics.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s what I ve called the happy birthday problem, which is I have a lot of friends who are of the left and are publicly of the left.
4
SPEAKER_01
And on my birthday, they ll send you a text message, happy birthday, but they will never tweet happy birthday lest they be acknowledging that you were born of woman and that this can t be allowed.
4
SPEAKER_01
So on the Sunday special, I ve had a bevy of people who are on the other side of the aisle, a lot of them.
4
SPEAKER_01
ranging from people in Hollywood like Jason Blum, to Larry Wilmore, to Sam, to just a lot of people on the left.
4
SPEAKER_01
I think we re, in the near future, probably gonna do a Sunday special with Ro Khanna up in California, the California congressperson.
4
SPEAKER_01
Very nice guy, had him on the show.
4
SPEAKER_01
That kind of stuff is fun and interesting.
4
SPEAKER_01
But I think that the easy way out for a clip that people don t like is to either immediately clip the clip, it s like a two minute clip and clip it down to 15 seconds where somebody insults me and then that goes viral, which is, you know, welcome to the internet.
4
SPEAKER_01
or to say, well, you re only debating colleges.
4
SPEAKER_01
You re only talking to 20.
4
SPEAKER_01
I mean, I talked to a lot more people than that.
4
SPEAKER_01
That s just not the stuff you re watching.
4
SPEAKER_00
You lost your cool in an interview with BBC s Andrew Neil, and you were really honest about it after, which was kind of refreshing and enjoyable.
4
SPEAKER_00
As the internet said, they ve never seen anyone lose an interview.
4
SPEAKER_00
So to me, honestly, it was like seeing like Floyd Mayweather Jr.
4
SPEAKER_00
or somebody like knocked down.
4
SPEAKER_00
What was the can you take me to?
5
SPEAKER_00
that experience?
5
SPEAKER_00
Here s that day.
5
SPEAKER_00
That day is I have a book release, didn t get a lot of sleep the night before, and this is the last interview of the day.
5
SPEAKER_00
And it s an interview with BBC.
5
SPEAKER_00
I don t know anything about BBC.
5
SPEAKER_00
I don t watch BBC.
5
SPEAKER_00
I don t know any of the hosts.
5
SPEAKER_00
So we get on the interview, and it s supposed to be about the book, and
5
SPEAKER_00
The host, Andrew Neal, doesn t ask virtually a single question about the book.
5
SPEAKER_00
He just starts reading me bad old tweets, which I hate.
5
SPEAKER_00
I mean, it s annoying and it s stupid and it s the worst form of interview when somebody just reads you bad old tweets, especially when I ve acknowledged bad old tweets before.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so I m going through the list with him.
5
SPEAKER_00
And this interview was solidly 20 minutes.
5
SPEAKER_00
I mean, it was a long interview.
5
SPEAKER_00
And we get to – and I make a couple of particularly annoyed mistakes in the interview.
5
SPEAKER_00
So annoyed mistake number one is the ego play, right?
5
SPEAKER_00
So there s a point in the middle of the interview where I say like, I don t even know who you are, which was true.
5
SPEAKER_00
I didn t know who he was.
5
SPEAKER_00
It turns out he s a very famous person in Britain.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so you can t make that ego play.
5
SPEAKER_01
He s not famous.
5
SPEAKER_00
It s a dumb thing to do, and it s an ass thing to do.
5
SPEAKER_00
So saying that was more just kind of peak in silliness.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so that was mistake number one.
5
SPEAKER_01
I enjoyed watching that.
5
SPEAKER_01
It was like, oh, Ben is human.
5
SPEAKER_00
I m glad somebody enjoyed it.
5
SPEAKER_00
So there is that.
5
SPEAKER_00
And then the other mistake was that I just don t watch enough British TV.
5
SPEAKER_00
So the way that interviews are done there are much more adversarial than American TV.
5
SPEAKER_00
In American TV, if somebody is adversarial with you, you assume that they re a member of the other side.
5
SPEAKER_00
That s typically how it is.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so I m critiquing some of his questions at the beginning, and I thought that the critique of some of his questions is actually fair.
5
SPEAKER_00
He was asking me about abortion, and I thought he was asking it from a way of framing the question that wasn t accurate, and so I assumed that he was on the left, because again, I d never heard of him.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so, you know, I mischaracterized him, and I apologize later for mischaracterizing him.
5
SPEAKER_00
We finally go through the interview, it s 20 minutes, he just keeps going with the bad old tweets, and finally I got up and I took off the microphone and I walked out.
5
SPEAKER_00
And immediately I knew it was a mistake.
5
SPEAKER_00
Like within 30 seconds of the end of the interview, I knew it was a mistake.
5
SPEAKER_00
And that s why even before the interview came out, I believe I corrected the record that Andrew Neil is not on the left.
5
SPEAKER_00
That s a mistake by me.
5
SPEAKER_00
And then, you know, took the hit for a bad interview.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so as far as, you know, what I wish I d done differently, I wish I d known who he was.
5
SPEAKER_00
I wish I d done my research.
5
SPEAKER_00
I wish that I had treated it as though there was a possibility that it was gonna be more adversarial than it was.
5
SPEAKER_00
I think I was incautious about the interview because it was pitched as it s just another book interview and it wasn t just another book interview.
5
SPEAKER_00
It was treated much more adversarially than that.
5
SPEAKER_00
So I wish that – that s on me.
5
SPEAKER_00
I got to research the people who are talking to me and watch their shows and learn about that.
5
SPEAKER_00
And then obviously, you know, the kind of gut level appeal to ego or arrogance like that, that s a bad look and shouldn t have done that.
5
SPEAKER_00
And losing your cool is always a bad look.
5
SPEAKER_01
So the fact that that sort of became somewhat viral and stood out just shows that it happens so rarely to you.
5
SPEAKER_01
So just to look at like the day in the life of Ben Shapiro, you speak a lot, very eloquently about difficult topics.
5
SPEAKER_01
What goes into the research, the mental part, and you always look pretty like energetic and,
5
SPEAKER_01
You re not exhausted by the burden, the heaviness of the topics you re covering day after day after day after day.
5
SPEAKER_01
So what goes through the preparation, mentally, diet-wise, anything like that?
5
SPEAKER_01
Like when do you wake up?
5
SPEAKER_00
Okay, so I wake up when my kids wake me up.
5
SPEAKER_00
Usually that s my baby daughter who s two and a half.
5
SPEAKER_00
She ll be here on the monitor usually about 6.15, 6.20 a.m.
5
SPEAKER_00
So I get up, my wife sleeps in a little bit.
5
SPEAKER_00
I go get the baby.
5
SPEAKER_00
Then my son gets up.
5
SPEAKER_00
And then my oldest daughter gets up, I have eight, six, and two.
5
SPEAKER_00
The boy s the middle child.
5
SPEAKER_01
Is that both a source of stress and happiness?
5
SPEAKER_00
Oh yeah, it s the height of both, right?
5
SPEAKER_00
I mean, it s the source of the greatest happiness.
5
SPEAKER_00
So the way that I characterize it is this when it comes to sort of kids in life.
5
SPEAKER_00
So when you re single,
5
SPEAKER_00
Your boundaries of happiness and unhappiness, you can be a zero in terms of happiness, you can be like a 10 in terms of happiness.
5
SPEAKER_00
Then you get married and it goes up to like a 20 and a negative 20 because the happiest stuff is with your wife and then the most unhappy stuff is when something happens to your spouse.
5
SPEAKER_00
It s the worst thing in the entire world.
5
SPEAKER_00
Then you have kids and all limits are removed.
5
SPEAKER_00
So the best things that have ever happened to me are things where I m watching my kids and they re playing together and they re being wonderful and sweet and cute and I love them so much.
5
SPEAKER_00
And the worst things are when my son is screaming at me for no reason because he s being insane.
5
SPEAKER_00
And I have to deal with that.
5
SPEAKER_00
Or something bad happens to my daughter at school or something like that.
5
SPEAKER_00
That stuff is really bad.
5
SPEAKER_00
So yes, the source of my greatest happiness is the source of my greatest stress.
5
SPEAKER_00
So they get me up at about 6.15 in the morning.
5
SPEAKER_00
I feed them breakfast.
5
SPEAKER_00
I m kind of scrolling the news while I m making the megs.
5
SPEAKER_00
just updating myself on anything that may have happened overnight.
5
SPEAKER_00
I go into the office, put on the makeup and the wardrobe or whatever, and then I sit down and do the show.
5
SPEAKER_00
A lot of the prep is actually done the night before because the news cycle doesn t change all that much between
5
SPEAKER_00
kind of late at night and in the morning, so I can supplement in the morning.
5
SPEAKER_00
So I do the show.
5
SPEAKER_01
So a lot of the preparation, like thinking through what are the big issues in the world is done the night before.
5
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, I mean, and that s reading, you know, pretty much all the legacy media.
5
SPEAKER_00
So I rip on legacy media a lot, but that s because a lot of what they do is really good and a lot of what they do is really bad.
5
SPEAKER_00
I cover a lot of legacy media.
5
SPEAKER_00
That s probably covering Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Post, Boston Globe, Daily Mail.
5
SPEAKER_00
Then I ll look over at some of the alternative media.
5
SPEAKER_00
I ll look at my own website, Daily Wire.
5
SPEAKER_00
I ll look at Breitbart.
5
SPEAKER_00
I ll look at The Blaze.
5
SPEAKER_00
I ll look at maybe The Intercept.
5
SPEAKER_00
I ll look at a bunch of different sources.
5
SPEAKER_00
Then I will look at
5
SPEAKER_00
different clips online, so media comes in handy here, Grabean comes in handy here, that sort of stuff, because my show relies very heavily on being able to play people so you can hear them in their own words.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so that s sort of the media die.
5
SPEAKER_00
So I sit down, I do the show,
5
SPEAKER_00
And then once I m done with the show, I usually have between, now it s like 11, 15 in the morning maybe.
5
SPEAKER_00
Because sometimes I ll pre-record the show.
5
SPEAKER_00
So it s 11, 15 in the morning.
5
SPEAKER_00
I ll go home, and if my wife s available, I ll grab lunch with her.
5
SPEAKER_00
If not, then I will go and work out.
5
SPEAKER_00
I try to work out like...
5
SPEAKER_00
five times a week with a trainer, something like that.
5
SPEAKER_00
And then I will- Just regular gym stuff?
5
SPEAKER_00
Just start at the gym?
5
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, weights and plyometrics and some CrossFit kind of stuff.
5
SPEAKER_00
And yeah, I mean, beneath this mild exterior lies a hulking monster.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so I ll do that.
5
SPEAKER_00
Then I ll
5
SPEAKER_00
I will do reading and writing.
5
SPEAKER_00
I m usually working on a book at any given time.
5
SPEAKER_01
You shut off the rest of the world.
5
SPEAKER_00
Yes.
5
SPEAKER_00
I put some music in my ears, usually Brahms or Bach, sometimes Beethoven or Mozart.
5
SPEAKER_00
Those four.
5
SPEAKER_00
Those are on rotation.
5
SPEAKER_00
No rap.
5
SPEAKER_00
No rap.
5
SPEAKER_00
Despite my extraordinary rendition of WAP.
5
SPEAKER_00
I am not, in fact, a rap fan.
5
SPEAKER_01
Do you still hate WAP, the song?
5
SPEAKER_00
I will say I do not think that it is the peak of Western civilized art.
5
SPEAKER_00
I don t think that 100 years from now people will be gluing their faces to a WAP and protest at the environment.
5
SPEAKER_01
But Brahms and the rest will be still around.
5
SPEAKER_00
Yes.
5
SPEAKER_00
I would assume if people still have a functioning prefrontal cortex and any sort of taste.
5
SPEAKER_01
Strong words from Ben Shapiro.
5
SPEAKER_01
All right, so you got some classical music in your ears and you re focusing.
5
SPEAKER_01
Are you at the computer when you re writing?
5
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, I m at the computer.
5
SPEAKER_00
Usually we have a kind of a room that has some sun coming in, so it s nice in there, or I ll go up to a library that we just completed for me.
5
SPEAKER_00
So I ll go up there and I ll write and read.
5
SPEAKER_00
Like with physical books?
5
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, I love physical books.
5
SPEAKER_00
Because I keep Sabbath, I don t use Kindle.
5
SPEAKER_00
Because when I m reading a book and I hit Sabbath, I have to turn off the Kindle.
5
SPEAKER_00
So that means that I have tons and tons and tons of physical books.
5
SPEAKER_00
When we moved from Los Angeles to Florida, I had about 7,000 volumes.
5
SPEAKER_00
I had to discard probably 4,000 of them.
5
SPEAKER_00
and then I ve built that back up now, so I m probably gonna have to go through another round where I put them somewhere else.
5
SPEAKER_00
I tend to tab books rather than highlighting them because I can t highlight on Sabbath, so I have like the little stickers and I put them in the book, so a typical book from me, you can see it on the book club, will be like filled with tabs on the side, things that I want to take.
5
SPEAKER_00
Now actually, I got a person who I pay to go through and write down in files the quotes that I like from the book, so I have those handy.
5
SPEAKER_00
So which is a good way for me to remember what it is that I ve that I ve read because I read probably some routine three and five books a week and then the in a good week five and then I You know write I read and then I go pick up my kids from school at 330.
5
SPEAKER_00
So according my kids I have no job I m there in the mornings until they leave for school.
5
SPEAKER_00
I pick them up from school I hang out with them until they go to bed, which is usually 730 or so so I m helping them with their homework and I m playing with them and I m
5
SPEAKER_00
taking them on rides in the brand new Tesla, which my son is obsessed with, and then I put them to bed, and then I sit back down, I prep for the next day, go through all those media sources I was talking about, compile kind of a schedule for what I want the show to look like, and run a show.
5
SPEAKER_00
It s very detail-oriented, nobody writes anything for me, I write all my own stuff.
5
SPEAKER_00
So every word that comes out of my mouth is my fault.
5
SPEAKER_00
And then
5
SPEAKER_00
you know, hopefully I have a couple hours to, or an hour to hang out with my wife before I go to bed.
5
SPEAKER_00
The words you write, do you edit a lot?
5
SPEAKER_01
Or does it just come out, you re thinking like, what are the key ideas I want to express?
5
SPEAKER_00
No, I don t tend to edit a lot.
5
SPEAKER_00
So I, thank God, I m able to write extraordinarily quickly.
5
SPEAKER_00
So I write very, very fast.
5
SPEAKER_00
In fact, in a previous life, I was... You also speak fast, so it s similar.
5
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, exactly.
5
SPEAKER_00
And I speak in paragraphs, so it s exactly the same thing.
5
SPEAKER_00
In a previous life, I was a ghostwriter, so I used to be sort of known as a turnaround specialist in the publishing industry.
5
SPEAKER_00
There d be somebody who came to the publisher and says, I have three weeks to get this book done, I don t have a word done.
5
SPEAKER_00
And they would call me up and be like, this person needs a book written.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so in three weeks, I d knock out 60,000 words or so.
5
SPEAKER_01
Is there something you can say to the process that you follow to think?
5
SPEAKER_01
Like how you think about ideas, like stuff is going on in the world and trying to understand what is happening, what are the explanations, what are the forces behind this?
5
SPEAKER_01
Do you have a process or just you wait for the muse to give you the interpretation?
5
SPEAKER_00
I mean I think that, I don t think it s a formal process, but because I read
5
SPEAKER_00
So there s two ways to do it.
5
SPEAKER_00
One is sometimes, you know, sometimes the daily grind of the news is going to refer back to core principles that are broader and deeper.
5
SPEAKER_00
So I thank God because I ve read so much on so many different things.
5
SPEAKER_00
of a lot of different point of views, then if something breaks and a piece of news breaks, I can immediately sort of channel that into, in the mental Rolodex, these three big ideas that I think are really important, and then I can talk at length about what those ideas are and I can explicate those.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so, you know, for example, when we were talking about must taking over Twitter before and I immediately go to the history of media, right, that s that s me tying it into a broader theme on, you know, and I do that, I would say fairly frequently what we re talking about.
5
SPEAKER_00
say, subsidization of industry, and I can immediately tie that into, okay, what s the history of subsidization in the United States, going all the way back to Woodrow Wilson and forward through FDR s industrial policy, and how does that tie into sort of broader economic policy internationally?
5
SPEAKER_00
So it allows me to tie into bigger themes, because what I tend to read is mostly not news.
5
SPEAKER_00
What I tend to read is mostly books.
5
SPEAKER_00
I would say most of my media diet is actually not the stuff.
5
SPEAKER_00
Like, that s the icing on the cake, but the actual cake is the hundreds of pages in history, econ,
5
SPEAKER_00
geography that I m social science that I m reading every week.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so that sort of stuff allows me to think more deeply about these things.
5
SPEAKER_00
So that s one way of doing it.
5
SPEAKER_00
The other way of doing it is Russia breaks in the news.
5
SPEAKER_00
I don t know anything about Russia.
5
SPEAKER_00
I immediately go and I purchase five books about Russia and I read all of them.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so one of the unfortunate things about our, the fortunate thing for me and the unfortunate thing about the world is that if you, and the unfortunate thing about the world is you read two books on a subject, you are now considered by the media an expert on the subject.
5
SPEAKER_00
So that s, you know, sad and shallow, but that is the way that it is.
5
SPEAKER_00
The good news for me is that my job isn t to be a full expert on any of these subjects, and I don t claim to be, right?
5
SPEAKER_00
I m not a Russia expert.
5
SPEAKER_00
I know enough on Russia to be able to understand when people talk about Russia, what the system looks like, how it works, and all of that, and then to explicate that for the common man, which a lot of people who are infused with the expertise can t really do.
5
SPEAKER_00
If you re so deep in the weeds that you re like a full-on academic expert on a thing, sometimes it s hard to translate that over to a mass audience, which is really my job.
5
SPEAKER_00
I think you can actually, it s funny, with the two books, you can actually
5
SPEAKER_01
get a pretty deep understanding if you read and also think deeply about it.
5
SPEAKER_01
It allows you to approach a thing from first principles.
5
SPEAKER_01
A lot of times if you re a quote unquote expert, you get carried away by the momentum of what the field has been thinking about.
5
SPEAKER_01
Versus like stepping back.
5
SPEAKER_01
All right.
5
SPEAKER_01
What is really going on that the challenge is to pick the right two books, right?
5
SPEAKER_00
So that usually what I ll try to find is somebody who knows the topic pretty well and have them recommend or a couple people and have them recommend books So a couple years ago.
5
SPEAKER_00
I knew nothing about Bitcoin I was at a conference and a couple of people who you ve had on your show actually were there and I asked them give me your top three books on Bitcoin and
5
SPEAKER_00
And so then I went and I read like nine books on Bitcoin.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so if you read nine books on Bitcoin, you at least know enough to get by.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so I can actually explain what Bitcoin is and why it works or why it doesn t work in some cases and what s happening in the markets that way.
5
SPEAKER_00
So that s very, very helpful.
5
SPEAKER_01
Well, Putin is an example.
5
SPEAKER_01
That s a difficult one to find the right books on.
5
SPEAKER_01
I think the new czar is the one I read where it was the most objective.
5
SPEAKER_00
One I read, I think, about Putin was one called Strongman.
5
SPEAKER_00
It was very highly critical of Putin, but it gave a good background on him.
5
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, so I m very skeptical of things that are critical of Putin, because it feels like there s activism injected into the history.
5
SPEAKER_01
Like the way The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich is written about Hitler, I like because there s almost not a criticism of Hitler.
5
SPEAKER_01
It s a description of Hitler, which is very, it s easier to do about a historical figure, which with William Shire, with The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, it s impressive because he lived through it.
5
SPEAKER_01
But it s very tough to find objective descriptions about the history of the man in a country of Putin, of Zelensky, of any difficult... Trump is the same.
5
SPEAKER_00
I feel like... Everybody has the hero-villain archetype, right?
5
SPEAKER_00
And it s like either somebody s completely a hero or completely a villain.
5
SPEAKER_00
And the truth is...
5
SPEAKER_00
pretty much no one is completely a hero or completely a villain.
5
SPEAKER_00
People, in fact, I m not sure that I love descriptions of people as heroes or villains generally.
5
SPEAKER_00
I think that people tend to do heroic things or do villainous things in the same way that I m not sure I love descriptions of people as a genius.
5
SPEAKER_00
My dad used to say this when I was growing up.
5
SPEAKER_00
He used to say they didn t believe that there were geniuses.
5
SPEAKER_00
He said he believed that there were people with a genius for something because people, you know, yes, there are people who are very high IQ and we call them geniuses, but does that mean that they re good at
5
SPEAKER_00
EQ stuff, not necessarily, but there are people who are geniuses at EQ stuff.
5
SPEAKER_00
In other words, it would be more specific to say that somebody is a genius at engineering than to say just broad spectrum, they re a genius.
5
SPEAKER_00
And that does avoid the problem of thinking that they re good at something that they re not good at, right?
5
SPEAKER_00
It s a little more specific.
5
SPEAKER_01
So because you read a lot of books, are there, can you look back, and it s always a tough question, because so many, it s like your favorite song, but are there books that have been influential on your life, that are impacting your thinking, or maybe ones you go back to that,
5
SPEAKER_01
that still carry insight for you.
5
SPEAKER_00
The Federalist Paper is a big one in terms of sort of how American politics works.
5
SPEAKER_00
The first econ book that I thought was really great, because it was written for teenagers, essentially, is one called Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt.
5
SPEAKER_00
It s like 150 pages.
5
SPEAKER_00
I recommend it to everybody sort of 15 and up.
5
SPEAKER_00
It s easier than, say, Thomas Sowell s Basic Econ, which is four or 500 pages.
5
SPEAKER_01
And it s looking at like macroeconomics, microeconomics, that kind of stuff.
5
SPEAKER_00
And then in terms of, there s a great book by Carl Truman called Rise and Triumph of the Modern Self, which I think is the best book of the last 10 years.
5
SPEAKER_00
That s been sort of impactful on some of the thoughts.
5
SPEAKER_00
I ve been having like what s the key idea in there?
5
SPEAKER_00
That s the key idea is that we ve shifted the nature of how identity is done in the West from how it was historically done that basically for nearly all of human history the way that we Identify as human beings is as a mix of our biological drives and then how that interacts with the social institutions around us and so when you re a child you re a bunch of
5
SPEAKER_00
unfettered biological drives, and it s your parents  job to civilize you.
5
SPEAKER_00
And civilize you literally means bring you into civilization, right?
5
SPEAKER_00
You learn the rules of the road.
5
SPEAKER_00
You learn how to integrate into institutions that already exist and are designed to shape you.
5
SPEAKER_00
And it s how you interact with those institutions that makes you you.
5
SPEAKER_00
It s not just a set of biological drives.
5
SPEAKER_00
And then, in the modern world, we ve really driven toward the idea that what we are is how we feel on the inside without reference to the outside world.
5
SPEAKER_00
And it s the job of the outside world to celebrate and reflect what we think about ourselves on the inside.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so what that means is that we are driven now toward fighting institutions because institutions are in positions.
5
SPEAKER_00
So everything around us, societal institutions, these are things that are crimping our style.
5
SPEAKER_00
They re making us not feel the way that we want to feel.
5
SPEAKER_00
And if we just destroy those things, then we ll be freer and more liberated.
5
SPEAKER_00
It s a, I think, much deeper model of how to think about why our social politics in particular are moving in a particular direction is that a ground shift has happened in how people think about themselves.
5
SPEAKER_00
And this has had some somewhat kind of shocking
5
SPEAKER_00
effect in terms of social politics.
5
SPEAKER_01
So there s negative consequences in your view of that, but is there also positive consequence of more power, more agency to the individual?
6
SPEAKER_00
I think that you can make the argument that institutions were weighing too heavily in how people form their identity, but I think that what we ve done has gone significantly too far on the other side.
6
SPEAKER_00
We basically decided to blow up the institutions in favor of unfettered
6
SPEAKER_00
feeling slash identity and I think that that is not only a large mistake, I think it s going to have dire ramifications for everything from suicidal ideation to institutional longevity in politics and in society more broadly.
6
SPEAKER_01
So speaking about the nature of self, you ve been an outspoken proponent of pro-life.
6
SPEAKER_01
Can you, can we start by you trying to steal man the case for pro-choice, that abortion is not murder and a woman s right to choose is a fundamental human right, freedom?
6
SPEAKER_00
So I think that the only way to steal man the pro-choice case is to, and be ideologically consistent, is to suggest that there is no interest in the life of the unborn
6
SPEAKER_00
that counterweighs at all freedom of choice.
6
SPEAKER_00
So what that means is we can take the full example or we can take sort of the partial example.
6
SPEAKER_00
So if we take the full example, what that would mean is that up until point of birth, which is sort of the Democratic Party platform position, that a woman s right to choose ought to extend for any reason whatsoever up to point of birth.
6
SPEAKER_00
The only way to argue that is that bodily autonomy is the only factor.
6
SPEAKER_00
There is no countervailing factor that would ever outweigh bodily autonomy.
6
SPEAKER_00
That would be the strongest version of the argument.
6
SPEAKER_00
Another version of that argument would be that the reason that bodily autonomy ought to weigh so heavily is because women can t be the equals of men if the vicissitudes of biology are allowed to decide their futures, right?
6
SPEAKER_00
If pregnancy changes women in a way that it doesn t change men, it s a form of sex discrimination for women to ever have to go through with pregnancy, which is an argument that was made by Ruth Bader Ginsburg kind of.
6
SPEAKER_00
Those are the arguments.
6
SPEAKER_00
The kind of softer version is the...
6
SPEAKER_00
more, I would say, emotionally resonant version of the argument, which is that bodily autonomy ought to outweigh the interests of the fetus up till point X. And then people have different feelings about what point X looks like.
6
SPEAKER_00
Is it up to the point of viability?
6
SPEAKER_00
Is it up to the point of the heartbeat?
6
SPEAKER_00
Is it up to 12 weeks or 15 weeks?
6
SPEAKER_00
And that really is where the American public is, where the American public is, broadly speaking, not state by state, where there are various really, really varied opinions.
6
SPEAKER_00
But like broadly speaking, it seems like the American public, by polling data, wants somewhere between a 12 and 15 week abortion restriction.
6
SPEAKER_00
And they believe that up until 12 or 15 weeks, there s not enough there for, to not be specific, but to be kind of how people feel about it, to outweigh a woman s bodily autonomy.
6
SPEAKER_00
And then beyond that point, then there s enough of an interest in the life of the pre-born child.
6
SPEAKER_00
It s developed enough, and now we care about it enough that it outweighs a woman s bodily autonomy.
6
SPEAKER_01
What s the strongest case for pro-life in your mind?
6
SPEAKER_00
I mean, the strongest case for pro-life is that, from conception, a human life has been created.
6
SPEAKER_00
It is a human life with potential.
6
SPEAKER_00
That human life with potential now has an independent interest in its own existence.
6
SPEAKER_01
If I may just ask a quick question, so conception is when a sperm fertilizes an egg?
6
SPEAKER_01
Yes.
6
SPEAKER_01
Okay, just to clarify the biological beginning of what conception is.
6
SPEAKER_00
I mean, because that is the beginning of human life.
6
SPEAKER_00
Now, there are other standards that people have drawn, right?
6
SPEAKER_00
Some people say implantation in the uterus.
6
SPEAKER_00
Some people will suggest
6
SPEAKER_00
viability, some brain development or heart development, but the clear dividing line between a human life exists and a human life does not exist is the biological creation of an independent human life with its own DNA strands and etc.
6
SPEAKER_00
which happens at conception.
6
SPEAKER_00
Once you acknowledge that there is that independent human life with potential, and I keep calling it that because people sometimes say potential human life, it s not a potential human life, it s a human life that is not developed yet to the full extent that it will develop.
6
SPEAKER_00
Once you say that, and once you say that it has its own interest, now you have to, now the burden of proof is to explain why bodily autonomy ought to allow for the snuffing out of that human life if we believe that human life ought not to be killed for, quote unquote, no good reason.
6
SPEAKER_00
You have to come up with a good reason.
6
SPEAKER_00
The burden of proof has now shifted.
6
SPEAKER_00
Now, we ll find people who will say, well, the good reason is that it s not sufficiently developed to outweigh the mental trauma or emotional trauma that a woman goes through if, for example, she was raped or the victim of incest.
6
SPEAKER_00
And that is a fairly emotionally resonant argument, but it s not necessarily positive.
6
SPEAKER_00
You can make the argument that just because something horrific and horrible happened to a woman does not rob the human life of its interest in life.
6
SPEAKER_00
One of the big problems in trying to draw any line for the self-interest of life in the
6
SPEAKER_00
human life, is that it s very difficult to draw any other line that doesn t seem somewhat arbitrary.
6
SPEAKER_00
You say that independent heartbeat, well, people have pacemakers.
6
SPEAKER_00
If you say brain function, people have various levels of brain function as adults.
6
SPEAKER_00
If you say viability, babies are not viable after they are born.
6
SPEAKER_00
If I left a newborn baby on a table and did not take care of it, it would be dead in two days.
6
SPEAKER_00
So once you start getting into sort of these lines, it starts to get very fuzzy very quickly.
6
SPEAKER_00
And so if you re looking for sort of a bright line moral rule,
6
SPEAKER_00
That would be the bright line moral rule.
6
SPEAKER_00
That s sort of the pro-life case.
6
SPEAKER_01
There s still mysterious, difficult scientific questions of things like consciousness.
6
SPEAKER_01
So what do you, does the question of consciousness, how does it come into play into this debate?
6
SPEAKER_00
So I don t believe that consciousness is the sole criterion by which we judge the self-interest in human life.
6
SPEAKER_00
So we are unconscious a good deal of our lives.
6
SPEAKER_00
That does not, we will be conscious again, right, when you re unconscious, when you re asleep, for example.
6
SPEAKER_00
Presumably your life is still worth living.
6
SPEAKER_00
If somebody came in and killed you, that d be a serious moral quandary, at the very least.
6
SPEAKER_01
But the birth of consciousness, the lighting up of the flame, the initial lighting up of the flame, there does seem to be something special about that.
6
SPEAKER_01
And it s a mystery of when that happens.
6
SPEAKER_00
Well, I mean, Peter Singer makes the case that basically self-consciousness doesn t exist until you re two and a half, right?
6
SPEAKER_00
So he says that even infanticide should be okay, right?
6
SPEAKER_00
He s the bioethicist over at Princeton.
6
SPEAKER_00
So you get into some real dicey territory once you get into consciousness.
6
SPEAKER_00
Also, the truth is that consciousness is more of a spectrum than it is a dividing line, meaning that there are people with various degrees of brain function.
6
SPEAKER_00
We don t actually know how conscious they are, and you can get into eugenic territory
6
SPEAKER_00
pretty quickly when we start dividing between lives that are worth living based on levels of consciousness and lives that are not worth living based on levels of consciousness.
6
SPEAKER_01
Do you find it, the aspect of women s freedom, do you feel the tension between that ability to choose the trajectory of your own life versus the rights of the unborn child?
6
SPEAKER_00
In one situation, yes, in one situation, no.
6
SPEAKER_00
If you ve had,
6
SPEAKER_00
sex with a person voluntarily.
6
SPEAKER_00
And as a product of that, you are now pregnant?
6
SPEAKER_00
No.
6
SPEAKER_00
You ve taken an action with a perfectly predictable result, even if you took birth control, this is the way that human beings procreated for literally all of human existence, and by the way, also how all mammals procreate.
6
SPEAKER_00
So the idea that this was an entirely unforeseen consequence of your activity, I find, I have less sympathy for you in that particular situation, because you could have made decisions that would not lead you to this particular impasse.
6
SPEAKER_00
In fact, this used to be the basis of marriage, right, was when we were a, apparently,
6
SPEAKER_00
more terrible society.
6
SPEAKER_00
We used to say that people should wait until they get married to have sex, a position that I still hold.
6
SPEAKER_00
And the reason for that was because then if you have sex and you produce a child, then the child will grow up in a two-parent family with stability.
6
SPEAKER_00
So, you know, not a ton of sympathy there.
6
SPEAKER_00
When it comes to rape and incest, obviously heavy, heavy sympathy.
6
SPEAKER_00
And so that s why I think you see, statistically speaking, a huge percentage of Americans, including many pro-life Americans, people who consider themselves pro-life,
6
SPEAKER_00
would consider exceptions for rape and incest.
6
SPEAKER_00
One of the sort of dishonest things that I think happens in abortion debates is arguing from the fringes.
6
SPEAKER_00
This tends to happen a lot, is pro-choice activists will argue from rape and incest to the other 99.8% of abortions.
6
SPEAKER_00
Or you ll see people on the pro-life side argue from partial birth abortion to all of abortion.
6
SPEAKER_00
You actually have to take on sort of the mainstream case and then decide whether or not that s acceptable or not.
6
SPEAKER_01
But to use the exception just ethically without generalizing it, that is a valid ethically exception.
6
SPEAKER_00
I don t hold that there should be an exception for rape or incest, because again, I hold by the bright line rule that once a human life with potential exists, then it has its own interest in life that cannot be curbed by your self-interest.
6
SPEAKER_00
The only exception that I hold by is the same exception that literally all pro-lifers hold by, which is the life of the mothers put in danger.
6
SPEAKER_01
Such a tough, tough topic, because if you believe that that s the line, then we re committing mass murder.
6
SPEAKER_00
Well, or at least mass killing.
6
SPEAKER_00
So I would say that murder typically requires a level of mens rea that may be absent in many cases of abortion.
6
SPEAKER_00
Because the usual follow-on question is, well, if it s murder, why not prosecute the woman?
6
SPEAKER_00
And the answer is because the vast majority of people who are having abortions don t actually believe that they re killing a person.
6
SPEAKER_00
They have a very different view of what is exactly happening.
6
SPEAKER_00
So, you know, I would say that there are all sorts of interesting hypotheticals that come in to play when it comes to abortion and you can play them any which way.
6
SPEAKER_00
But levels – let s put it this way.
6
SPEAKER_00
There are gradations of wrongs.
6
SPEAKER_00
I don t think that all abortions are equally blameworthy even if I would ban.
6
SPEAKER_00
virtually all of them.
6
SPEAKER_00
I think that they re mitigating circumstances that make, while being wrong, some abortions less morally blameworthy than others.
6
SPEAKER_00
I think that, you know, I can admit a difference between killing a two-week-old embryo in the womb and stabbing a seven-year-old in the face.
6
SPEAKER_00
Like, I can recognize all that while still saying I think that it would be wrong to terminate a pregnancy.
6
SPEAKER_01
Do you think the question of when life begins, which I think is a fascinating question, is a question of science or a question of religion?
6
SPEAKER_00
I mean, when life begins, it s a question of science.
6
SPEAKER_00
When that life becomes valuable enough for people to want to protect it is going to be a question that is beyond science.
6
SPEAKER_00
Science doesn t have moral judgments to make about the value of human life.
6
SPEAKER_00
This is one of the problems that Sam Harris and I have had this argument many times and it s always kind of interesting.
6
SPEAKER_00
Because Sam is of the opinion that you can get to ought from is.
6
SPEAKER_00
That science says is, therefore we can learn ought.
6
SPEAKER_00
So human flourishing is the goal of life.
6
SPEAKER_00
And I would say to him, I don t see where you get that from evolutionary biology.
6
SPEAKER_00
You can assume it, just say you re assuming it, but don t pretend that that is a conclusion that you can draw straight from
6
SPEAKER_00
biological reality itself, because obviously that doesn t exist in the animal world, for example.
6
SPEAKER_00
Nobody assumes the innate value of every ant.
6
SPEAKER_01
I think I know your answer to this, but let s test it, because I think you re going to be wrong.
6
SPEAKER_01
So there s a robot behind you.
6
SPEAKER_01
Do you think there will be a time in the future when it will be unethical and illegal to kill a robot, because they will have sentience?
6
SPEAKER_01
My guess is you would say no, Lex, because there s a fundamental difference between humans and robots, and I just want to get you on record, because I think you d be wrong.
6
SPEAKER_00
I mean, it depends on the level of development, I would assume, of the robots.
6
SPEAKER_00
I mean, you re assuming a complexity in the robots that eventually imitates what we in the religious life would call the human soul, the ability to choose freely, for example, which I believe is sort of the capacity
6
SPEAKER_00
human beings.
6
SPEAKER_00
The ability to suffer.
6
SPEAKER_00
Yeah.
6
SPEAKER_00
If all of that could be proved and not programmed, meaning the freely willed capacity of a machine to do X, Y, or Z. You could not pinpoint exactly where it happens in the program.
6
SPEAKER_00
Right.
6
SPEAKER_00
Yeah.
6
SPEAKER_00
It s not deterministic.
6
SPEAKER_00
Yeah.
6
SPEAKER_00
Then it would raise serious moral issues for sure.
6
SPEAKER_00
I m not trying to know the answer to that question.
6
SPEAKER_01
Are you afraid of that time?
6
SPEAKER_00
I m not sure I m afraid of that time.
6
SPEAKER_00
I mean, it s any more than I d be afraid if aliens arrived in the world and had these characteristics.
6
SPEAKER_01
There s just a lot of moral complexities and they don t necessarily have to be in the physical space.
6
SPEAKER_01
They can be in the digital space.
6
SPEAKER_01
There s an increased sophistication and number of bots on the internet, including on Twitter.
6
SPEAKER_01
As they become more and more intelligence, there s going to be serious questions about what is our moral duty to protect ones that have or claim to have an identity.
6
SPEAKER_00
And that ll be really interesting.
6
SPEAKER_00
Actually, what I m afraid of is the opposite happening, meaning that people, the worst that should happen is that we develop robots so sophisticated that they appear to have free will, and then we treat them with human dignity.
6
SPEAKER_00
That should be the worst that happens.
6
SPEAKER_00
What I m afraid of is the opposite, is that we, if we re talking about this particular hypothetical, that we develop robots that have all of these apparent abilities, and then we dehumanize them, which leads us to also dehumanize the other humans around us, which you could easily see happening.
6
SPEAKER_00
The devaluation of life to the point where
6
SPEAKER_00
It doesn t really matter.
6
SPEAKER_00
I mean people have always treated, unfortunately, newly discovered other humans this way.
6
SPEAKER_00
So I don t think there s actually a new problem.
6
SPEAKER_00
I think it s a pretty old problem.
6
SPEAKER_00
It ll just be interesting when it s made of human hands.
6
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, it s an opportunity to celebrate humanity or to
6
SPEAKER_01
to bring out the worst in humanity.
6
SPEAKER_01
So the derision that naturally happens, like you said, with pointing out the other.
6
SPEAKER_01
Let me ask you about climate change.
6
SPEAKER_01
Let s go from the meme to the profound philosophy.
6
SPEAKER_01
Okay, the meme was there s a clip of you talking about climate change and saying that- Ah, the Aquaman meme.
6
SPEAKER_01
You said that for the sake of argument, if the water level rises five to 10 feet in the next hundred years, people will just sell their homes and move.
6
SPEAKER_01
And then the meme is Zelda who?
6
SPEAKER_01
Can you argue both sides of that?
6
SPEAKER_00
The argument that they re making is a straw man.
6
SPEAKER_00
The argument that I m making is over time.
6
SPEAKER_00
I don t mean that if a tsunami is about to hit your house, you can list it on eBay.
6
SPEAKER_00
That s not what I mean, obviously.
6
SPEAKER_00
What I mean is that human beings have an extraordinary ability to adapt.
6
SPEAKER_00
It s actually our best quality.
6
SPEAKER_00
And that as water levels rise, real estate prices in those areas tends to fall.
6
SPEAKER_00
that over time, people tend to abandon those areas, they tend to leave, they tend to, right now, sell their houses, and then they tend to move.
6
SPEAKER_00
And eventually, those houses will be worthless, and you won t have anybody to sell to, but presumably not that many people will be living there by that point, which is one of the reasons why the price would be low, because there s no demand.
6
SPEAKER_01
So it s over a hundred years.
6
SPEAKER_01
So all of these price dynamics are very gradual relative to the other price dynamics.
6
SPEAKER_00
Correct.
6
SPEAKER_00
That s why the joke of it, of course, is that like, I m saying that tomorrow there s a tsunami on your source step.
6
SPEAKER_00
And you re like, oh, Bob will buy my house.
6
SPEAKER_00
Bob ain t gonna buy your house.
6
SPEAKER_00
Like we all get that, but it s a funny name.
6
SPEAKER_00
I laughed at it.
6
SPEAKER_01
How is your view on climate change?
6
SPEAKER_01
The human contribution to climate change, what we should do in terms of policy to respond to climate change.
6
SPEAKER_01
How has that changed over the years?
6
SPEAKER_00
I would say,
6
SPEAKER_00
The truth is for years and years, I ve believed that climate change was a reality and that anthropogenic climate change is a reality.
6
SPEAKER_00
I don t argue with the IPCC estimates.
6
SPEAKER_00
I know climatologists at places like MIT or Caltech and they know this stuff better than I do.
6
SPEAKER_00
So, you know, the notion that climate change is just not happening or that human beings have not contributed to climate change.
6
SPEAKER_00
I find doubtful.
6
SPEAKER_00
The question is to what extent human beings are contributing to climate change.
6
SPEAKER_00
Is it 50%?
6
SPEAKER_00
Is it 70%?
6
SPEAKER_00
Is it 90%?
6
SPEAKER_00
I think there s a little bit more play in the joints there, so it s not totally clear.
6
SPEAKER_00
The one thing I do know, and this I know with factual accuracy, is that all of the measures that are currently being proposed are unworkable and will not happen.
6
SPEAKER_00
So when people say Paris Climate Accords, even if those were imposed, you re talking about lowering the potential trajectory of climate change by a fraction of a degree.
6
SPEAKER_00
If you re talking about the, if you re talking about green new deal, net zero by 2050, the carbon is up there in the air and the climate change is going to happen.
6
SPEAKER_00
Also, you re assuming that geopolitical dynamics don t exist.
6
SPEAKER_00
So everybody is going to magically get on the same page and we re all going to be
6
SPEAKER_00
imposing massive carbon taxes to get to net zero by 2050.
6
SPEAKER_00
I mean like hundreds of times higher than they currently are.
6
SPEAKER_00
And that s not me saying, that s Klaus Schwab saying this of the World Economic Forum, who s a big advocate of exactly this sort of policy.
6
SPEAKER_00
And the reality is that we re going to have to accept that at least 1.5 degrees Celsius of climate change is baked into the cake by the end of the century.
6
SPEAKER_00
Again, not me talking, William Nordhaus, the economist, who just won the Nobel Prize in this stuff, talking.
6
SPEAKER_00
And so what that suggests to me is what we ve always known.
6
SPEAKER_00
Human beings are crap at mitigation and excellence in adaptation.
6
SPEAKER_00
We are very bad at mitigating our own faults.
6
SPEAKER_00
We are very good at adapting to the problems as they exist.
6
SPEAKER_00
Which means that all of the estimates that billions will die, that there will be mass starvation, that we ll see the migration in just a few years of hundreds of millions of people.
6
SPEAKER_00
Those are wrong.
6
SPEAKER_00
What you ll see is a gradual change of living.
6
SPEAKER_00
People will move away from areas that are inundated on the coast.
6
SPEAKER_00
You ll see people building seawalls.
6
SPEAKER_00
You ll see people adapting new technologies to suck carbon out of the air.
6
SPEAKER_00
You ll see geoengineering.
6
SPEAKER_00
This is the sort of stuff that we should be focused on and the sort of bizarre focus on what if we just keep tossing hundreds of billions of dollars at the same three technologies over and over in the hopes that if we subsidize it, this will magically make it more efficient.
6
SPEAKER_00
I ve seen no evidence whatsoever that that is going to be the way that we get ourselves out of this.
6
SPEAKER_00
Necessity being the mother of invention, I think human beings will adapt because we have adapted and we will continue to adapt.
6
SPEAKER_01
So to the degree we invest in the threat of this, it should be into the policies that help with the adaptation versus the mitigation.
7
SPEAKER_01
developing technologies that carbon out of the air.
7
SPEAKER_01
Again, if I thought that there was more sort of hope for the green technologies currently in play than subsidization of those technologies, I might be a little bit more for, but I haven t seen tremendous progress over the course of the last 30 years in the reliability of, for example, wind energy or the ability to store solar energy to the extent necessary to actually power a grid.
7
SPEAKER_00
What s your thoughts on nuclear energy?
7
SPEAKER_00
Nuclear energy is great.
7
SPEAKER_01
Nuclear energy is a proven source of energy and we should be radically
7
SPEAKER_01
extending the use of nuclear energy.
7
SPEAKER_01
To me, honestly, this is like a litmus test question as to whether you take climate change seriously.
7
SPEAKER_01
If you re on right or left and you take climate change seriously, you should be in favor of nuclear energy.
7
SPEAKER_01
If you re not, I know that you re just, you have other priorities.
7
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, the fascinating thing about the climate change debate is the dynamics of the fear mongering over the past few decades, because some of the nuclear energy was tied up into that somehow.
7
SPEAKER_00
There s a lot of fear about nuclear energy.
7
SPEAKER_00
It seems like there s a lot of social phenomena, social dynamics involved versus dealing with just science.
7
SPEAKER_00
It s interesting to watch.
7
SPEAKER_00
On my darker days, it makes me cynical about our ability to use reason and science to deal with the threats of the world.
7
SPEAKER_01
I think that our ability to use reason and science to deal with threats of the world is almost a time frame question.
7
SPEAKER_01
So I think that we re, again, we re very bad at looking down the road and saying, you know, because people can t handle, for example, even things like compound interest.
7
SPEAKER_01
Like the idea that if I put a dollar in the bank today that
7
SPEAKER_01
15 years from now, that s going to be worth a lot more than a dollar.
7
SPEAKER_01
People can t actually see that.
7
SPEAKER_01
And so the idea of let s foresee a problem, then we ll deal with it right now, as opposed to 30 years down the road.
7
SPEAKER_01
Typically, we let the problem happen, and then we solve it.
7
SPEAKER_01
And it s bloodier and worse than it would have been if we had solved it 30 years ago.
7
SPEAKER_01
But it is, in fact, effective.
7
SPEAKER_01
And sometimes it turns out the solution that we re proposing 30 years in advance is not effective.
7
SPEAKER_01
And that can be a major problem as well.
7
SPEAKER_00
Well, that s then to steel man the case for fear-mongering, for irrational fear-mongering.
7
SPEAKER_00
We need to be scared shitless in order for us to do anything.
7
SPEAKER_00
I m generally against that, but maybe on a population scale, maybe some of that is necessary for us to respond appropriately for two long-term threats.
7
SPEAKER_00
We should be scared shitless.
7
SPEAKER_01
I don t think that we can actually do that though.
7
SPEAKER_01
First of all, I think that it s platonic lies are generally bad.
7
SPEAKER_01
And then second of all, I don t think that we actually have the capacity to do this.
7
SPEAKER_01
I think that the people who are, you know, the sort of elites of our society who get together in rooms and talk about this sort of stuff.
7
SPEAKER_01
And I ve been in some of those meetings at my synagogue Friday night, actually.
7
SPEAKER_01
I was going to make the joke, but I m glad you did.
7
SPEAKER_01
I ve been in rooms, Davos-like rooms.
7
SPEAKER_01
And when people discuss these sorts of topics, and they re like, what if we just tell people that it s going to be a disaster with tsunamis and day after tomorrow?
7
SPEAKER_01
It s like, you guys don t have that power.
7
SPEAKER_01
You don t.
7
SPEAKER_01
And by the way, you dramatically undercut your own power because of COVID to do this sort of stuff.
7
SPEAKER_01
Because a lot of the sort of, what if we scare the living hell out of you to the point where you stay in your own house for
7
SPEAKER_01
two years, and we tell you you can t send your kids to school.
7
SPEAKER_01
And then we tell you that the vaccine is going to prevent transmission.
7
SPEAKER_01
And then we also tell you that we need to spend $7 trillion in one year, and it won t have any inflationary effect.
7
SPEAKER_01
And it turns out you re wrong on literally all of those things.
7
SPEAKER_01
The last few years have done more to undermine institutional trust than any time in probably American history.
7
SPEAKER_01
It s pretty, pretty amazing.
7
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, I tend to agree with that.
7
SPEAKER_00
The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.
7
SPEAKER_00
Let me ask you back to the question of God.
7
SPEAKER_00
And a big ridiculous question, who s God?
7
SPEAKER_01
Who is God?
7
SPEAKER_01
So I m going to use sort of the Aquinas formulation of what God is.
7
SPEAKER_01
If there is a cause of all things, not physical things, if there is a cause underlying the reason of the universe, then that is the thing we call God.
7
SPEAKER_01
So, not a big guy in the sky with a beard.
7
SPEAKER_01
He is the force underlying the logic of the universe, if there is a logic to the universe.
7
SPEAKER_01
And he is the creator, in the Judaic view, of that universe.
7
SPEAKER_01
And he does have an interest in us living in accordance with the laws of the universe that, if you re a religious Jew, are encoded in the Torah, but if you re not a religious Jew, it would be encoded in the natural law by sort of Catholic theology.
7
SPEAKER_00
Why do you think God created the universe?
7
SPEAKER_00
Or, as is popularly asked, what do you think is the meaning?
7
SPEAKER_00
behind it?
7
SPEAKER_00
What s the meaning of life?
7
SPEAKER_01
What s the meaning of life?
7
SPEAKER_01
So I think that the meaning of life is to fulfill what God made you to do, and that is a series of roles.
7
SPEAKER_01
I think that human beings, and here you have to look to sort of human nature rather than looking kind of to big questions.
7
SPEAKER_01
I ve evolved something that I ve really been working on, you know, I m writing a book about this actually, that I call colloquially role theory.
7
SPEAKER_01
And basically the idea is that the way that we interact with the world is through a series of roles.
7
SPEAKER_01
And those are also the things we find most
7
SPEAKER_01
important and most implementable.
7
SPEAKER_01
And there s sort of virtue ethics, right, which suggests that if we act in accordance with virtue, like Aristotle, then we will be living the most fulfilled and meaningful life.
7
SPEAKER_01
And then you have sort of deontological ethics, like Kantian ethics, that it s a rule-based ethic.
7
SPEAKER_01
If you follow the rules, then you ll find the meaning of life.
7
SPEAKER_01
And then what I m proposing is that there s something that I would call role ethics, which is there are a series of roles that we play across our lives, which are also the things that we tend to put on our tombstones and find the most meaningful.
7
SPEAKER_01
So when you go to a cemetery, you can see what people found the most meaningful because it s the stuff they put on the stone that has like four words on it, right?
7
SPEAKER_01
like beloved father, beloved mother, sister, brother.
7
SPEAKER_01
And you might have a job once in a while, a creator, a religious person, right?
7
SPEAKER_01
These are all roles that have existed across societies and across humanity.
7
SPEAKER_01
And those are the things where we actually find meaning.
7
SPEAKER_01
And the way that we navigate those roles brings us meaning.
7
SPEAKER_01
And I think that God created us in order to fulfill those roles for purposes that I can t begin to understand because I ain t him.
7
SPEAKER_01
And the more we the more we recognize
7
SPEAKER_01
those roles and the more we live those roles, and then we can express freedom within those roles.
7
SPEAKER_01
I think that liberty exists inside each of those roles, and that s what makes all of our lives different and fun.
7
SPEAKER_01
We all parent in different ways, but being a parent is a meaningful role.
7
SPEAKER_01
We all have spouses, but how you interact that relationship is what makes your life meaningful and interesting.
7
SPEAKER_01
That is what we were put on earth to do, and if we perform those roles properly, and those roles do include things like being a creator, like we have a creative instinct as human beings, being a creator or being an innovator,
7
SPEAKER_01
being being a defender of your family, being somebody who builds up being a social member of your community, which is something that we re built to do.
7
SPEAKER_01
If we fulfill those roles properly, then we will have made the world a better place than we than we inherited it.
7
SPEAKER_01
And we will also have have
7
SPEAKER_01
had the joy of experiencing the sort of flow they talk about in psychology, where when you engage in these roles, you actually do feel a flow.
7
SPEAKER_00
So these roles are a fundamental part of the human condition?
7
SPEAKER_01
Yes.
7
SPEAKER_00
So the book you re working on is constructing a system to help us understand?
7
SPEAKER_01
It s looking at, let s assume that all that s true.
7
SPEAKER_01
The real question of the book is how do you construct a flourishing and useful society and politics?
7
SPEAKER_00
So a society level.
7
SPEAKER_00
If this is our understanding of a human being, how do we construct a good society?
7
SPEAKER_01
Right, exactly.
7
SPEAKER_01
Because I think that a lot of political theory is right now based in either
7
SPEAKER_01
JS Mill kind of thought, which is all that a good politics does allows you wave your hand around until you hit somebody in the face.
7
SPEAKER_01
Or Rawlsian thought, which is what if we constructed society in order to achieve the most for the least, essentially, you know, what if we constructed society around what actually makes humans the most fulfilled, and that is the the
7
SPEAKER_01
fulfillment of these particular roles.
7
SPEAKER_01
And where does liberty come into that?
7
SPEAKER_01
How do you avoid the idea of a tyranny in that?
7
SPEAKER_01
You have to be a mother.
7
SPEAKER_01
You must be a father.
7
SPEAKER_01
Where does freedom come into that?
7
SPEAKER_01
Can you reject those roles totally as a society and be okay?
7
SPEAKER_01
The answer probably is not.
7
SPEAKER_01
So you need a society that actually
7
SPEAKER_01
promotes and protects those roles, but also protects the freedom inside those roles.
7
SPEAKER_01
And that raises a more fundamental question of what exactly liberty is for.
7
SPEAKER_01
And I think that both the right and the left actually tend to make a mistake when they discuss liberty.
7
SPEAKER_01
The left tends to think that liberty is an ultimate good, that simple choice makes a bad thing good, which is not true.
7
SPEAKER_01
And I think the right talks about liberty in almost the same terms sometimes.
7
SPEAKER_01
And I think that s not true either.
7
SPEAKER_01
The question is whether liberty is
7
SPEAKER_01
of inherent value or instrumental value?
7
SPEAKER_01
Is liberty good in and of itself or is liberty good because it allows you to achieve X, Y, or Z?
7
SPEAKER_01
And, you know, I ve thought about this one a lot and I tend to come down on the latter side of the aisle.
7
SPEAKER_01
I mean, this is – you asked me areas where I ve moved.
7
SPEAKER_01
This may be an area where I ve moved is that I think when you think more shallowly about politics or maybe more quickly because this is how we talk in America is about liberties and rights.
7
SPEAKER_01
We tend to think that the right is what make – not like the political right.
7
SPEAKER_01
Rights make things good.
7
SPEAKER_01
Liberties make things good.
7
SPEAKER_01
The question really is what are those rights and liberties for?
7
SPEAKER_01
Now, you have to be careful so that that doesn t shade into tyranny, right?
7
SPEAKER_01
You can only have liberty to do the thing that I say that you can do.
7
SPEAKER_01
But there have to be spheres of liberty that are roiling and interesting and filled with debate but without threatening the chief institutions that surround those liberties because if you destroy the institutions, the liberties will go too.
7
SPEAKER_01
If you knock down the pillars of the society, the liberties that are on top of those pillars are going to collapse.
7
SPEAKER_01
And I think that that s, if people are feeling as though we re on the verge of tyranny, I think that s why.
7
SPEAKER_00
This is fascinating, by the way.
7
SPEAKER_00
It s an instrumental perspective on liberty.
7
SPEAKER_00
That s going to have to give me a lot to think about.
7
SPEAKER_00
Let me ask a personal question.
7
SPEAKER_00
Was there ever a time that you had a crisis of faith where you questioned your belief in God?
7
SPEAKER_01
Sure.
7
SPEAKER_01
And I would less call it a crisis of faith than an ongoing question of faith, which I think is, I hope, most religious people.
7
SPEAKER_01
And the word Israel, right, in Hebrew, Yisrael, means to struggle with God.
7
SPEAKER_01
That s literally what the word means.
7
SPEAKER_01
And so the idea of struggling with God, right, if you re Jewish or B nai Yisrael, the idea of struggling with God I think is endemic to the human condition.
7
SPEAKER_01
If you understand what God s doing, then I think you re wrong.
7
SPEAKER_01
And if you think that that question doesn t matter, then I think you re also wrong.
7
SPEAKER_01
I think that God is a very necessary hypothesis.
7
SPEAKER_00
The struggle with God is life.
7
SPEAKER_00
That is the process of life.
7
SPEAKER_01
That s right.
7
SPEAKER_01
Because you re never going to get to that answer, otherwise you re God and you aren t.
7
SPEAKER_00
Why does God allow cruelty and suffering in the world?
7
SPEAKER_00
One of the tough questions.
7
SPEAKER_01
So, we re going deep here.
7
SPEAKER_01
There s two types of cruelty and suffering.
7
SPEAKER_01
So if we re talking about human cruelty and suffering, because God does not intervene to prevent people from exercising their free will, because to do so would be to deprive human beings of the choice that makes them human.
7
SPEAKER_01
And this is the sin of the Garden of Eden basically, is that God could make you an angel in which case you wouldn t have the choice to do the wrong thing.
7
SPEAKER_01
But so long as we are going to allow for cause and effect in a universe shaped by your choice, cruelty and evil are going to exist.
7
SPEAKER_01
And then there s the question of just the natural cruelty and vicissitudes of life.
7
SPEAKER_01
And the answer there is I think that God obscures himself.
7
SPEAKER_01
I think that if God were to appear in all of his glory to people on a regular basis, I think that would make faith, you wouldn t need it.
7
SPEAKER_01
There d be no such thing as faith.
7
SPEAKER_01
It would just be reality.
7
SPEAKER_01
Nobody has to prove to you that the sun rises every day.
7
SPEAKER_01
But if God is to allow us the choice to believe in him, which is the ultimate choice from a religious point of view, then he s gonna have to obscure himself behind tragedy and horror
7
SPEAKER_01
and all those other things.
7
SPEAKER_01
I mean, this is a fairly well-known Kabbalistic concept called Tzimtzum in Judaism, which is the idea that when God created the universe, he sort of withdrew in order to make space for all of these things to happen.
7
SPEAKER_00
So God doesn t have an instrumental perspective on liberty?
7
SPEAKER_01
In a chief sense, he does because the best use of liberty is going to be belief in him and you can misuse your liberty, right?
7
SPEAKER_01
there will be consequences if you believe in an afterlife, or if you believe in sort of a generalized better version of life led by faith, then liberty does have a purpose.
7
SPEAKER_01
But he also believes that you have to give people, from a cosmic perspective, the liberty to do wrong without threatening all the institutions of society.
7
SPEAKER_01
I mean, that s why it does say in the Bible that if man sheds blood by man, shall his blood be shed, right?
7
SPEAKER_01
There are punishments that are
7
SPEAKER_01
in biblical thought for doing things that are wrong.
7
SPEAKER_00
So for a human being who lacks the faith in God, so if you re an atheist, can you still be a good person?
7
SPEAKER_01
Of course.
7
SPEAKER_01
A hundred percent.
7
SPEAKER_01
And there are a lot of religious people who are crappy people.
7
SPEAKER_01
How do I understand that tension?
7
SPEAKER_01
Well, from a religious perspective, what you would say is that it is perfectly plausible to live
7
SPEAKER_01
in accordance with a set of rules that don t damage other people without believing in God, you just might be understanding the reason for doing that wrong, is what a religious person would say.
7
SPEAKER_01
This is the conversation, again, that I had with Sam, basically, is you and I agree, I said this to Sam, you and I agree on nearly everything when it comes to morality, like we probably disagree on 15 to 20% of things.
7
SPEAKER_01
The other 80% is because you grew up in a Judeo-Christian society and so do I and we grew up 10 miles from each other around the turn of the millennium.
7
SPEAKER_01
So there s that.
7
SPEAKER_01
So you can perfectly well be an atheist living a good, moral, decent life because you can live a good, moral, decent life with regard to other people without believing in God.
7
SPEAKER_01
I don t think you can build a society on that because I think that relies on the sort of
7
SPEAKER_01
goodness of mankind, natural goodness of mankind.
7
SPEAKER_01
I don t believe in the natural goodness of mankind.
7
SPEAKER_01
You don t?
7
SPEAKER_01
No.
7
SPEAKER_01
I believe in, I believe that man is created both sinful and with the capacity for sin and the capacity for good.
7
SPEAKER_00
But if you let them be on their own, isn t, doesn t it... Without social institutions to shape them, I think that that s very likely to go poorly.
7
SPEAKER_00
Well, we came to something we disagree on, but that might reflect itself in our approach to Twitter as well.
7
SPEAKER_00
I think if humans are left on their own, they tend towards good.
7
SPEAKER_00
They definitely have the capacity for good and evil, but when left on their own, I tend to believe they re good.
7
SPEAKER_01
I think they might be good with limits.
7
SPEAKER_01
What I mean by that is that what the evidence I think tends to show is that human beings are quite tribal.
7
SPEAKER_01
So what you ll end up with is people who are good with their immediate family and maybe their immediate neighbors, and then when they re threatened by an outside tribe, then they kill everyone, which is sort of the history of civilization in the pre-civilizational era, which was a very violent time.
7
SPEAKER_01
Pre-civilizational era was quite violent.
7
SPEAKER_00
Do you think on the topic of tribalism in our modern world,
7
SPEAKER_00
What are the pros and cons of tribes?
7
SPEAKER_00
Is that something we should try to outgrow as a civilization?
7
SPEAKER_01
I don t think it s ever gonna be possible to fully outgrow tribalism.
7
SPEAKER_01
I think it s a natural human condition to want to be with people who think like you or have a common set of beliefs.
7
SPEAKER_01
And I think trying to obliterate that in the name of a universalism likely leads to utopian results that have devastating consequences.
7
SPEAKER_01
Utopian sort of universalism has been failing every time it s tried.
7
SPEAKER_01
Whether you re talking about, now it seems to be, sort of a liberal universalism, which is being rejected by a huge number of people around the world in various different cultures.
7
SPEAKER_01
Or you re talking about religious universalism, which typically comes with religious tyranny.
7
SPEAKER_01
Or you re talking about communistic or Nazi-esque
7
SPEAKER_01
sort of universalism, which comes with mass slaughter.
7
SPEAKER_01
So this is, you know, universalism, I m not a believer in.
7
SPEAKER_01
I think that you have, you know, some values that are fairly limited, that all human beings should hold in common.
7
SPEAKER_01
And that s pretty much it.
7
SPEAKER_01
Like, I think that everybody should have the ability to join with their own culture.
7
SPEAKER_01
I think how we define tribes a different thing.
7
SPEAKER_01
So I think that tribes should not be defined by innate physical characteristics, for example.
7
SPEAKER_01
because I think that, thank God as a civilization we ve outgrown that, and I think that that is...
7
SPEAKER_01
that is a childish way to view the world.
7
SPEAKER_01
All the tall people aren t a tribe.
7
SPEAKER_01
All the black people aren t a tribe.
7
SPEAKER_01
All the white people aren t a tribe.
7
SPEAKER_00
So the tribes should be formed over ideas versus physical characteristics.
7
SPEAKER_01
That s right, which is why actually to go back to sort of the beginning of the conversation when it comes to Jews, you know, I m not a big believer in ethnic Judaism.
7
SPEAKER_01
As a person who takes Judaism seriously, Judaism is more to me than you were born with a last name like Berg or Steen.
7
SPEAKER_01
And so I ve made it controversial.
7
SPEAKER_01
Hitler would disagree with you.
7
SPEAKER_01
He would disagree with me, but that s because he was a tribalist, right?
7
SPEAKER_00
He thought in racial terms.
7
SPEAKER_00
So maybe robots will help us see humans as one tribe.
7
SPEAKER_01
Maybe that... This is Reagan s idea, right?
7
SPEAKER_01
Reagan said, well, if there s an alien invasion, then we ll all be on the same side.
7
SPEAKER_01
So I ll go over to the Soviets and we ll talk about it.
7
SPEAKER_00
There s some deep truth to that.
7
SPEAKER_00
What does it mean to be a good man?
7
SPEAKER_00
the various role that a human being takes on in this role theory that you ve spoken about, what does it mean to be good?
7
SPEAKER_01
It means to perform – now I will do Aristotle.
7
SPEAKER_01
It means to perform the function well.
7
SPEAKER_01
What Aristotle says is the good is not like moral good, moral evil in the way that we tend to think about it.
7
SPEAKER_01
He meant that a good cup holds liquid and a good spoon holds soup.
7
SPEAKER_01
It means that like a thing that is broken can t hold those things, right?
7
SPEAKER_01
So the idea of being a good person means that you are fulfilling the function for which you were made.
7
SPEAKER_01
It s a teleological view of humanity.
7
SPEAKER_01
So if you re a good father, this means that you are bringing up your child in durable values that is going to bring them up
8
SPEAKER_00
Healthy, capable of protecting themselves and passing on the traditional wisdom of the ages to future generations while allowing for the capacity for innovation.
8
SPEAKER_00
That d be being a good father.
8
SPEAKER_00
Being a good spouse would mean protecting and unifying with your spouse and building a safe family and a place to raise children.
8
SPEAKER_00
Being a good citizen of your community means protecting the fellow citizens of your community while incentivizing them to build for themselves.
8
SPEAKER_00
And it becomes actually much easier to think of how to, this is why I like the role theory, because it s very hard since sort of in virtue theory to say, be generous.
8
SPEAKER_00
Okay, how does that manifest?
8
SPEAKER_00
I don t know.
8
SPEAKER_00
I don t know what that looks like.
8
SPEAKER_00
Sometimes being generous might be being not.
8
SPEAKER_00
generous to other people, right?
8
SPEAKER_00
When Aristotle says that you should be benevolent, like what does that mean?
8
SPEAKER_00
This is very vague.
8
SPEAKER_00
When I say be a good dad, most people sort of have a gut level understanding of what it means to be a good dad, and mostly what they have a gut level understanding of what it means to really be a really bad dad.
8
SPEAKER_00
And so what it means to be a good man is to fulfill those roles, as many of them as you can.
8
SPEAKER_00
properly and at full function, and that s a very hard job.
8
SPEAKER_00
I ve said before that, you know, because I engage a lot with the public and all of this, you know, the word great comes up a lot.
8
SPEAKER_00
What does it take to be a great leader?
8
SPEAKER_00
What does it take to be a great person?
8
SPEAKER_00
And I ve always said to people, it s actually fairly easy to be great.
8
SPEAKER_00
It s very difficult to be good.
8
SPEAKER_00
There are a lot of very great people who are not very good, and there are not a lot of good people, and most of them, you know, frankly, most good people
8
SPEAKER_00
die mourned by their family and friends, and two generations later they re forgotten, but those are the people who incrementally move the ball forward in the world, sometimes much more than the people who are considered great.
8
SPEAKER_01
Understand the role in your life that involves being a cup and be damn good at it.
8
SPEAKER_00
Exactly, that s right.
8
SPEAKER_01
Hold the soup.
8
SPEAKER_01
It s very, uh, Jordan Peterson.
8
SPEAKER_01
It s very like lobster with Jordan.
8
SPEAKER_01
I think people quote you for years and years to come on that.
8
SPEAKER_01
Um, what advice would you give?
8
SPEAKER_01
A lot of young people look up to you.
8
SPEAKER_01
What advice?
8
SPEAKER_01
Um, despite the better judgment.
8
SPEAKER_01
No, I m just kidding.
8
SPEAKER_00
I m just only kidding, only kidding.
8
SPEAKER_01
They seriously look up to you and draw inspiration from your ideas, from your bold thinking.
8
SPEAKER_01
What advice would you give to them?
8
SPEAKER_01
How to live a life worth living, how to have a career they can be proud of, and everything like that.
8
SPEAKER_00
live out the values that you think are really important and seek those values in others would be the first piece of advice.
8
SPEAKER_00
Second piece of advice, don t go on Twitter until you re 26 because your brain is fully developed at that point.
8
SPEAKER_00
As I said early on, I was on social media and writing columns from the time I was 17.
8
SPEAKER_00
It was a great opportunity and as it turns out, a great temptation to say enormous numbers of stupid things when you re young.
8
SPEAKER_00
I mean you re kind of trying out ideas and you re putting them on, you re taking them off and social media permanentizes those things.
8
SPEAKER_00
engraves them in stone, and then that s used against you for the rest of your life.
8
SPEAKER_00
So I tell young people this all the time.
8
SPEAKER_00
Like, if you want to be on social media, be on social media, but don t post.
8
SPEAKER_00
Like, watch if you want to take in information.
8
SPEAKER_00
And more importantly, you should read books.
8
SPEAKER_00
As far as, you know, other advice, I d say engage in your community.
8
SPEAKER_00
There s no substitute for engaging your community and engage in interpersonal action because that will soften you and make you a better person.
8
SPEAKER_00
I ve become a better person since I got married.
8
SPEAKER_00
I ve become an even better person since I ve had kids, so you can imagine how terrible I was before all these things.
8
SPEAKER_00
Engaging your community does allow you to build the things that matter on the most local possible level.
8
SPEAKER_00
I mean, the outcome, by the way, of the sort of politics of the politics of fulfillment that I was talking about earlier is a lot of localism because the roles that I m talking about are largely local roles.
8
SPEAKER_00
So that stuff has to be protected locally.
8
SPEAKER_00
I think we focus way too much in this country and others on like world-beating solutions, national solutions, solutions that apply to hundreds of millions of people.
8
SPEAKER_00
How do I get to the solutions that apply for like
8
SPEAKER_00
five.
8
SPEAKER_00
And then we get to the solutions that apply to like 20.
8
SPEAKER_00
And then we get to the solutions that involve 200 people or 1000 people.
8
SPEAKER_00
Let s solve that stuff.
8
SPEAKER_00
And I think the solutions at the higher level flow bottom up not top down.
8
SPEAKER_01
What about mentors and maybe role models?
8
SPEAKER_01
Have you had a mentor, or maybe people you look up to, either you interacted on a local scale, like you actually knew them, or somebody you really looked up to?
8
SPEAKER_00
For me, I m very lucky.
8
SPEAKER_00
I grew up in a very solid two-parent household.
8
SPEAKER_00
I m extremely close to my parents.
8
SPEAKER_00
I ve lived near my parents literally my entire life, with the exception of three years of law school.
8
SPEAKER_00
And like right now, they live a mile and a half from us.
8
SPEAKER_01
Would you learn about life from your parents and your father?
8
SPEAKER_00
So, oh man, so many things from my parents.
8
SPEAKER_00
That s a hard one.
8
SPEAKER_00
I mean, I think the good stuff from my dad is that you should hold true to your values.
8
SPEAKER_00
He s very big on, you have values, those values are important, hold true to them.
8
SPEAKER_01
Did you understand what your values are, what your principles are early on?
8
SPEAKER_00
Fairly quickly, yeah.
8
SPEAKER_00
And so he was very big on that, which is why, for example, I get asked a lot in the Jewish community why I wear a kippah, and the answer is it never occurred to me to take off the kippah.
8
SPEAKER_00
I always wore it.
8
SPEAKER_00
Why would I take it off at any point?
8
SPEAKER_00
That s the life that I want to live, and that s the way it is.
8
SPEAKER_00
So that was a big one from my dad.
8
SPEAKER_00
From my mom, practicality.
8
SPEAKER_00
My dad is more of a dreamer.
8
SPEAKER_00
My mom is much more practical.
8
SPEAKER_00
And so, you know, the sort of lessons that I learned from my dad are that you can have, this is sort of the counter lesson, is that you can have a good idea, but if you don t have a plan for implementation, then it doesn t end up as reality.
8
SPEAKER_00
And I think actually he s learned that better over the course of his life, too.
8
SPEAKER_00
But my dad, from time I was very young, he wanted me to engage with other adults, and he wanted me to learn from other people, and one of his rules was if he didn t know something, he would find somebody who he thought did know the thing for me to talk to.
8
SPEAKER_00
That was a big thing.
8
SPEAKER_00
So I m very lucky.
8
SPEAKER_00
I have wonderful parents.
8
SPEAKER_00
As far as sort of other mentors, in terms of the media, Andrew Breitbart was a mentor.
8
SPEAKER_00
Andrew obviously, he was kind of known in his latter days, I think more for the militancy than when I was very close with him.
8
SPEAKER_01
So for somebody like me who knows more about the militancy, can you tell me what is a great, what makes him a great man?
8
SPEAKER_00
Well, what made Andrew great is that he engaged with everyone.
8
SPEAKER_00
I mean everyone.
8
SPEAKER_00
So there are videos of him.
8
SPEAKER_00
Rollerblading down the boulevard and people would be protesting and he would literally like rollerblade up to them and he would say, let s go to lunch together and he would just do this.
8
SPEAKER_00
That s actually who Andrew was.
8
SPEAKER_00
What was the thinking behind that?
8
SPEAKER_00
Just just was he was just careless.
8
SPEAKER_00
He was he was much more outgoing than I am.
8
SPEAKER_00
Actually, he was he was very warm with people like for me.
8
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, I would say that with Andrew, I knew Andrew for, I remember when I was 16, he passed away when I would have been 28.
8
SPEAKER_00
So I knew Andrew for 10, 12 years.
8
SPEAKER_00
And people who met Andrew for about 10 minutes,
8
SPEAKER_00
knew Andrew 99% as well as I knew Andrew because he was just all out front like everything was out here and he was he loved talking to people he loved engaging with people and so this made him a lot of fun and unpredictable and fun to watch and all that and then I think Twitter got to him I think by you know Twitter is
8
SPEAKER_00
One of the lessons I learned from Andrew is the counter lesson, which is Twitter can poison you.
8
SPEAKER_00
Twitter can really wreck you.
8
SPEAKER_00
If you spend all day on Twitter reading the comments and getting angry at people who are talking about you, it becomes a very difficult life.
8
SPEAKER_00
And I think that in the last year of his life, Andrew got very caught up in that because of a series of circumstances.
8
SPEAKER_01
it can actually affect your mind, it can actually make you resentful, all that kind of stuff.
8
SPEAKER_00
I tend to agree with that.
8
SPEAKER_00
But the lesson that I learned from Andrew is engage with everybody, take joy in sort of the mission that you re given.
8
SPEAKER_00
And you can t always fulfill that.
8
SPEAKER_00
Sometimes it s really rough and difficult.
8
SPEAKER_00
I m not gonna pretend that it s all fun and rainbows all the time, because it isn t.
8
SPEAKER_00
And some of the stuff that I have to cover, I don t like.
8
SPEAKER_00
And some of the things I have to say, I don t particularly like.
8
SPEAKER_00
That happens.
8
SPEAKER_00
But that s what I learned from Andrew.
8
SPEAKER_00
As far as sort of other mentors, I had some teachers when I was a kid who said things that stuck with me.
8
SPEAKER_00
I had a fourth grade teacher named Miss Gianetti who said, don t let potential be written on your tombstone.
8
SPEAKER_00
which is a pretty- That s a good line.
8
SPEAKER_00
It s a great line, particularly to a fourth grader, but it was, that guy had an 11th grade English teacher named Anthony Miller, who was terrific, really good writer.
8
SPEAKER_00
He had studied with James Joyce at Trinity College in Dublin, and so he and I really got along, and he helped my writing a lot.
8
SPEAKER_01
Did you ever have doubt in yourself?
8
SPEAKER_01
I mean, especially as you ve gotten into the public eye with all the attacks, did you ever doubt your ability to stay strong, to be able to be a voice of the ideas that you represent?
8
SPEAKER_00
You definitely, I don t doubt my ability to say what I want to say.
8
SPEAKER_00
I doubt my ability to handle the emotional blowback of saying it, meaning that that s difficult.
8
SPEAKER_00
I mean, again, to take just one example, in 2016, the ADL measured that I was the number one target of antisemitism on planet Earth.
8
SPEAKER_00
You know, that s not fun.
8
SPEAKER_00
You know, it s unpleasant.
8
SPEAKER_00
And when you take critiques, not from antisemites, but when you take critiques from people generally,
8
SPEAKER_00
we talked about near the beginning, how you surround yourself with people who are gonna give you good feedback.
8
SPEAKER_00
Sometimes it s hard to tell.
8
SPEAKER_00
Sometimes people are giving you feedback, and you don t know whether it s well-motivated or poorly motivated.
8
SPEAKER_00
And if you are trying to be a decent person, you can t cut off the mechanism of feedback.
8
SPEAKER_00
And so what that means is sometimes you take to heart the wrong thing, or you take it to heart too much.
8
SPEAKER_00
You re not light enough about it.
8
SPEAKER_00
You take it very, very seriously.
8
SPEAKER_00
You lose sleep over it.
8
SPEAKER_00
I mean, I can t tell you the number of nights where I ve just not slept because of
8
SPEAKER_00
some critique somebody s made of me and I ve thought to myself, maybe that s right.
8
SPEAKER_00
And sometimes it is right.
8
SPEAKER_01
And you know, that s... Some of that is good to stew in that criticism, but some of that can destroy you.
8
SPEAKER_01
Do you have a shortcut?
8
SPEAKER_01
So Rogan has talked about taking a lot of mushrooms.
8
SPEAKER_01
Since you re not into the mushroom thing, what s your escape from that?
8
SPEAKER_01
Like when you get low, when you can t sleep.
8
SPEAKER_00
Usually writing is a big one for me.
8
SPEAKER_00
So writing for me is cathartic.
8
SPEAKER_00
I love writing.
8
SPEAKER_00
That is a huge one.
8
SPEAKER_00
Spending time with my family.
8
SPEAKER_00
Again, I usually have a close circle of friends who I will talk with in order to sort of bounce ideas off of them.
8
SPEAKER_00
And then once I ve kind of talked it through, I tend to feel a little bit better.
8
SPEAKER_00
Exercise is also a big one.
8
SPEAKER_00
I mean, if I go a few days without exercise, I tend to get pretty grumpy pretty quickly.
8
SPEAKER_00
I mean, I gotta keep this six pack going somehow, man.
8
SPEAKER_01
There you and Rogan agree.
8
SPEAKER_01
We haven t, aside from Twitter, mentioned love.
8
SPEAKER_01
What s the role of love in the human condition, Ben Shapiro?
8
SPEAKER_00
Man, don t get asked for love too much.
8
SPEAKER_00
In fact, I was
8
SPEAKER_00
You don t get that question on college camp?
8
SPEAKER_00
No, I typically don t actually.
8
SPEAKER_00
In fact, we were at an event recently, it was a Daily Wire event, and in the middle of this event, it was a meet and greet with some of the audience, and in the middle of this event, this guy walks by with this girl, they re talking, and they re talking to me, and their time kind of runs, the security s moving them, and he says, no, no, no, wait, hold on a minute, and he gets down on one knee and he proposes to the girl in front of me.
8
SPEAKER_00
And I said to him, this is the weirdest proposal
8
SPEAKER_00
in human history, what is happening right now?
8
SPEAKER_00
Like, I was your choice of Cupid here?
8
SPEAKER_00
So well, you know, we actually like got together because we listened to your show.
8
SPEAKER_00
And so I can perform it like a Jewish marriage right now, we re gonna need like a glass, we re gonna need some wine, it s gonna get weird real fast.
8
SPEAKER_00
But yeah, so love doctor, I m typically not asked too much about.
8
SPEAKER_00
The role of love is important in binding together
8
SPEAKER_00
human beings who ought to be bound together, and the role of respect is even more important in binding together broader groups of people.
8
SPEAKER_00
I think one of the mistakes that we make in politics is trying to substitute love for respect or respect for love, and I think that s a big mistake.
8
SPEAKER_00
do not bear tremendous love in the same sense that I do for my family, for random strangers.
8
SPEAKER_00
I don t.
8
SPEAKER_00
I love my family.
8
SPEAKER_00
I love my kids.
8
SPEAKER_00
Anybody who tells you they love your kid as much as you love your kid is lying to you.
8
SPEAKER_00
It s not true.
8
SPEAKER_00
I love my community more than I love other communities.
8
SPEAKER_00
I love my state more than I love other states.
8
SPEAKER_00
I love my country more than I love other countries.
8
SPEAKER_00
That s all normal.
8
SPEAKER_00
And that s all good.
8
SPEAKER_00
The problem of empathy can be when that becomes so tight knit that you re not outward looking, that you don t actually have respect for other people.
8
SPEAKER_00
So in the local level, you need love in order to protect you and shield you and give you the strength to go forward.
8
SPEAKER_00
And then beyond that, you need a lot of respect for people who are not in the circle of love.
8
SPEAKER_00
And I think trying to extend love to people who
8
SPEAKER_00
either are not gonna love you back, or are gonna slap you in the face for it, or who you re just not that close to, it s either, it runs the risk of being airsats and fake, or it can actually be counterproductive in some senses.
8
SPEAKER_01
Well, there s some sense in which you could have love for other human beings,
8
SPEAKER_01
based on the humanity that connects everybody, right?
8
SPEAKER_01
So you love this whole project that we re a part of.
8
SPEAKER_01
And actually, another thing we disagree on, so loving a stranger, like having that basic empathy and compassion towards a stranger, even if it can hurt you, I think is ultimately like a,
8
SPEAKER_01
That to me is what it means to be a good man, to live a good life, is to have that compassion towards strangers.
8
SPEAKER_01
Because to me it s almost, it s easy and natural and obvious to love people close to you.
8
SPEAKER_01
But to step outside yourself and to love others, I think that s the fabric of a good society.
8
SPEAKER_01
You don t think there s value to that?
8
SPEAKER_00
I think there can be, but I think we re also discussing love almost in two different senses.
8
SPEAKER_00
Meaning that when I talk about love, what I think of immediately is the love I bear for my wife and kids.
8
SPEAKER_00
Or my parents, or my siblings.
8
SPEAKER_00
Or the love of my close friends.
8
SPEAKER_00
But I think that using that same term to describe how I feel about strangers I think would just be inaccurate.
8
SPEAKER_00
And so that s why I m suggesting that respect might be a more solid and realistic foundation.
8
SPEAKER_00
for the way that we treat people far away from us or people who are strangers.
8
SPEAKER_00
Respect for their dignity, respect for their priorities, respect for their role in life.
8
SPEAKER_00
It might be too much of an ask, in other words.
8
SPEAKER_00
There might be the rare human being who s capable of literally loving a homeless man on the street the way that he loves his own family.
8
SPEAKER_00
But if you respect the homeless man on the street the way that you respect your own family, because everyone deserves that respect, I think that you get to the same end without forcing people into a position of
8
SPEAKER_00
of unrealistically expecting themselves to feel a thing they don t feel.
8
SPEAKER_00
You know, one of the big questions in religion that comes up is God makes certain requests that you feel certain ways, right?
8
SPEAKER_00
You re supposed to be happy about certain things or, you know, you re supposed to love thy neighbor as thyself, right?
8
SPEAKER_00
You ll notice that in that statement, it s thy neighbor, right?
8
SPEAKER_00
It s not just like generally anyone, it s love thy neighbor as thyself.
8
SPEAKER_00
In any case,
8
SPEAKER_01
I think that extends to anyone that follows you on Twitter.
8
SPEAKER_01
Thy neighbor, because God anticipated the social network aspect that is not constrained by geography.
8
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, I m going to differ with you on the interpretation on that, but in any case, the sort of, you know, the kind of extension of
8
SPEAKER_00
love outwards might be too big an ask, so maybe we can start with respect and then hopefully, out of that respect, can grow something more if people earn their way in.
8
SPEAKER_00
Because I think that one of the big problems when we re talking about universalism is when people say, like, I m a world citizen.
8
SPEAKER_00
I love people of the other country as much as I love myself or as much as I love my country.
8
SPEAKER_00
It tends to actually lead to an almost crammed-down utopianism that I think can be kind of difficult because with love comes a certain expectation of solidarity.
8
SPEAKER_00
And I think, right, I mean, when you love your family, you love your wife, like there s a certain level of solidarity that is required inside the home in order to preserve the most loving kind of home.
8
SPEAKER_00
And so if you love everybody, then that sort of implies a certain level of solidarity that may not exist.
8
SPEAKER_00
So maybe the idea is, for me, start with respect, and then maybe as people respect each other more, then love is an outgrowth of that, as opposed to starting with love and then hoping that respect develops.
8
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, there s a danger that that word becomes empty and instead is used for dogmatic kind of,
8
SPEAKER_01
Utopianism.
8
SPEAKER_00
I mean, this is the way that, for example, religious theocracies very often work.
8
SPEAKER_00
We love you so much we have to convert you.
8
SPEAKER_00
So let s start with respect.
8
SPEAKER_01
What I would love to see after our conversation today is to see a Ben Shapiro that continues the growth on Twitter of being even more respectful than you ve already been, and maybe one day converting that into love on Twitter.
8
SPEAKER_01
If I could see that in this world, that would make me die a happy man.
8
SPEAKER_01
A little bit more love in the world, for me, as a gift.
8
SPEAKER_00
I ll try to make that happen.
8
SPEAKER_00
I do have one question.
8
SPEAKER_00
I m gonna need you to tell me, which jokes are okay?
8
SPEAKER_00
Are jokes still okay?
8
SPEAKER_00
So yeah, can I just run your Twitter from now on?
8
SPEAKER_00
You just send it to me.
8
100%.
8
SPEAKER_00
I will pre-screen you the jokes.
8
SPEAKER_00
And you can tell me if this is a loving joke or if this is a hate-filled obnoxious joke.
8
SPEAKER_01
People will be very surprised by all the heart emojis that start popping up on your Twitter.
8
SPEAKER_01
But thank you so much for being bold and fearless and exploring ideas.
8
SPEAKER_01
And your Twitter aside, thank you for being just good faith and all the arguments and all the conversations you re having with people.
8
SPEAKER_01
It s a huge honor.
8
SPEAKER_01
Thank you for talking to me.
8
SPEAKER_00
Thanks for having me.
8
SPEAKER_00
I really appreciate it.
8
SPEAKER_01
Thanks for listening to this conversation with Ben Shapiro.
8
SPEAKER_01
To support this podcast, please check out our sponsors in the description.
8
SPEAKER_01
And now let me leave you with some words from Ben Shapiro himself.
8
SPEAKER_01
Freedom of speech and thought matters, especially when it is speech and thought with which we disagree.
8
SPEAKER_01
The moment the majority decides to destroy people for engaging a thought it dislikes, thought crime becomes a reality.
9
SPEAKER_00
Thank you for listening and hope to see you next time.