0
SPEAKER_00
The following is a conversation with Anna Frabel, an astrophysicist at MIT studying the oldest stars in the Milky Way galaxy in order to understand the chemical and physical conditions of the early universe and how from that our galaxy formed and evolved to what it is today, the place we humans call home.
0
SPEAKER_00
And now, a quick use of convention of each sponsor.
0
SPEAKER_00
Check them out in the description.
0
SPEAKER_00
It s the best way to support this podcast.
0
SPEAKER_00
We got Hexclad for well-designed and well-engineered cookware, Numeri for the world s hardest data science tournament, and House of Macadamias for delicious snacks.
0
SPEAKER_00
Choose wisely, my friends.
0
SPEAKER_00
Also, if you want to work with our team, World of Hiring, go to lexfriedman.com slash hiring.
0
SPEAKER_00
And now onto the full ad reads.
0
SPEAKER_00
Never any ads in the middle.
0
SPEAKER_00
I try to make these interesting, but if you skip them, please still check out the sponsors.
0
SPEAKER_00
I enjoy their stuff.
0
SPEAKER_00
Maybe you will too.
0
SPEAKER_00
This episode is brought to you by a new sponsor, Hexclad, the maker of well engineered and patented
0
SPEAKER_00
Quotes hybrid cookware.
0
SPEAKER_00
I don t know what that means all I know it looks badass I got it a couple of weeks ago.
0
SPEAKER_00
I already cooked a couple of steaks on it.
0
SPEAKER_00
It s just perfect my Goal for this weekend actually is to cook an omelet on it, but it works perfect for steak Non-steak, I don t know how they do it, but as they say it has the
0
SPEAKER_00
performance of stainless steel, the durability of cast iron, and it has non-toxic and non-stick coating.
0
SPEAKER_00
The steaks, in case you were wondering, were delicious.
0
SPEAKER_00
I like it about medium-rare, and there s probably a lot more to be said about how I like to cook steak in different conditions when I m traveling, when I m at home, all that kind of stuff.
0
SPEAKER_00
Steak is the simple meal I return to time and time again for a source of simple happiness and fulfillment.
0
SPEAKER_00
Almost exclusively I ve been eating one time a day.
0
SPEAKER_00
And so it s steak, big steak with a bunch of veggies on the side if I m going keto and just steak if I m going carnivore.
0
SPEAKER_00
Anyway, go to hexclad.com and use code LEX to get 10% off your entire order.
0
SPEAKER_00
That s hexclad.com and use code LEX for 10% off your entire order.
0
SPEAKER_00
This show is also brought to you by Numerai, a hedge fund that I ve talked a bunch about in the past.
0
SPEAKER_00
It uses machine learning to make investment decisions, and it s a tournament that challenges data scientists from all over the place to construct predictive models for financial markets, and then it uses those models to help people make financial decisions.
0
SPEAKER_00
If you re a data scientist and you wanna be involved, this is an amazingly interesting, complex,
0
SPEAKER_00
difficult and impactful machine learning tournament and challenge.
0
SPEAKER_00
I think too often in the machine learning community, the problems will work with the toy problems.
0
SPEAKER_00
And so I really love the idea that enumerize creating this problem, this giant problem that is not at all a toy.
0
SPEAKER_00
It s working with real markets and real money.
0
SPEAKER_00
That s to me, super exciting.
0
SPEAKER_00
Head over to numeri.com slash lex to sign up for a tournament and hone your machine learning skills.
0
SPEAKER_00
That s numeri.com slash lex for a chance to play against me.
0
SPEAKER_00
Yes, me.
0
SPEAKER_00
And for a chance to win a share of the tournament s prize pool.
0
SPEAKER_00
This show is brought to you by House of Macadamias, a company that ships delicious, high-quality and healthy macadamia nuts and macadamia nut-based snacks directly to your door.
0
SPEAKER_00
They re perfectly portioned.
0
SPEAKER_00
I give it to the guests.
0
SPEAKER_00
They love it.
0
SPEAKER_00
I mean, it s everything you want in a snack in terms of healthiness, in terms of deliciousness, in terms of bringing variety and joy to your life.
0
SPEAKER_00
They got bars, they got whole nuts, they got whatever.
0
SPEAKER_00
It s 30% less carbs than almonds.
0
SPEAKER_00
It s the only nut rich in omega-7s.
0
SPEAKER_00
I think a long time I was reading what is the healthiest nut, and macadamias were up there.
0
SPEAKER_00
I believe they were at number one in the website I was looking at.
0
SPEAKER_00
And I was heartbroken to find out that I think peanuts were at the bottom, and you know,
0
SPEAKER_00
So much of my life I ve wasted on peanuts when I could ve been spending all this valuable time with macadamia nuts.
0
SPEAKER_00
Anyway, if you want some more delicious nuts in your life, go to houseofmacadamias.com slash lex to get a free box of their bestseller, the Namibian Sea Salted Macadamia Nuts.
0
SPEAKER_00
They re delicious.
0
SPEAKER_00
Plus 20% off your entire order.
0
SPEAKER_00
That s houseofmacadamias.com slash lex.
0
SPEAKER_00
This is the Lex Friedman Podcast.
0
SPEAKER_00
To support it, please check out our sponsors in the description.
0
SPEAKER_00
And now, dear friends, here s Anna for Bell.
0
SPEAKER_00
Let s go back to the early days.
0
SPEAKER_00
What did the formation of the Milky Way galaxy look like?
0
SPEAKER_00
Or maybe we wanna start even before that.
0
SPEAKER_00
What did the formation of the universe look like?
0
SPEAKER_01
Well, we scientists believe there was the Big Bang, some big beginning.
0
SPEAKER_01
But what is important for my work, and I think that s what we re going to talk about, is what kind of elements were present at that time.
0
SPEAKER_01
So the Big Bang left a universe behind that was made of just hydrogen and helium and tiny little sprinkles of lithium.
0
SPEAKER_01
And that was pretty much it.
0
SPEAKER_01
As it turns out, it s actually quite hard to make stars or any structure from that.
0
SPEAKER_01
That s fairly hot gas.
0
SPEAKER_01
And so the very first stars that formed prior to any galaxies were very massive stars, big stars, 100 times the mass of the Sun, and they were made from just hydrogen and helium.
0
SPEAKER_01
So big stars explode pretty fast after a few million years only.
0
SPEAKER_01
That s very short on cosmic time scales.
0
SPEAKER_01
And in their explosions, they provided the first heavier elements to the universe because in their cores, all stars fuse lighter elements like hydrogen and helium into heavier ones.
0
SPEAKER_01
And then that goes all the way up to iron, and then all that material gets ejected in these massive supernova explosions.
0
SPEAKER_01
And that marked a really, really important transition in the universe because after that first explosion,
0
SPEAKER_01
it was no longer chemically pristine.
0
SPEAKER_01
And that set the stage for everything else to happen, including us here talking today.
0
SPEAKER_00
So what do you mean by pristine?
0
SPEAKER_00
So there s a whole complex soup of elements now, as opposed to just hydrogen, helium, and a little bit of lithium.
0
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, so after the Big Bang, just hydrogen and helium.
0
SPEAKER_01
We don t really need to talk too much about lithium because the amount was so small.
0
SPEAKER_01
And after these very first stars formed and exploded, heavy elements like carbon, oxygen, magnesium, iron, all of that stuff was suddenly present in the gas clouds.
0
SPEAKER_01
in tiny amounts only, very tiny amounts, but that actually helped, especially the carbon and the oxygen, to make the gas cool.
0
SPEAKER_01
These atoms are more complicated than hydrogen, that s just a proton, and so it has cooling properties, can send out photons outside of the gas cloud, so the gas can cool, and when you have gas that gets colder and colder, you can make smaller and smaller stars, so you can fragment it and clump it and turn it into stars, like the sun.
0
SPEAKER_01
And the cool thing about that is that when you have small stars like the Sun, they have a really long lifetime.
0
SPEAKER_01
So those first low-mass stars that formed back then are still observable today.
0
SPEAKER_01
That is actually what I do.
0
SPEAKER_01
I try to find these early survivors because they tell us what the gas looked like back then.
0
SPEAKER_01
They have preserved that composition of these early gas clouds, the chemical compositions.
0
SPEAKER_01
until today.
0
SPEAKER_01
So I don t need to look very far into the universe to study all the beginnings.
0
SPEAKER_01
I can just chemically analyze the oldest stars, and it s like unpacking everything that happened back then.
0
SPEAKER_01
It s very exciting.
0
SPEAKER_00
So to just reiterate, so in the very early days, in the first few million years, there was giant stars that s mostly hydrogen and helium, and then they exploded in these supernova explosions, and then they made these clumps.
0
SPEAKER_01
Oh, wow.
0
SPEAKER_00
Non-pristine clumps.
0
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, pretty much.
0
SPEAKER_01
So it took a few hundred million years for the first stars to emerge.
0
SPEAKER_01
And then they exploded after a few million years.
0
SPEAKER_01
Kaboom.
0
SPEAKER_01
And then it s like, I always consider the universe like a, you know, a nice soup.
0
SPEAKER_01
And then these first supernova explosions kind of provided the salt, you know, just a little sprinkle of heavier elements.
0
SPEAKER_01
And that made it really tasty.
0
SPEAKER_01
It s just changed it completely.
0
SPEAKER_01
Right.
0
SPEAKER_01
And that changed the physics of the gas.
0
SPEAKER_01
So that meant that these gas clouds that were surrounding the former first stars, they could now cool down and clump and form the next generation of stars that now included also little stars.
0
SPEAKER_01
And as I just mentioned, the small stars have these really long lifetimes.
0
SPEAKER_01
The Sun has a lifetime of 10 billion years.
0
SPEAKER_01
Any star that is even less massive will have an even longer lifetime.
0
SPEAKER_01
So that gives us a chance to still observe some of the stars that formed back then.
0
SPEAKER_01
So we are testing the conditions, the chemical and physical conditions of the early universe even before the galaxy formed.
0
SPEAKER_00
So what s the timeline that we re talking about?
0
SPEAKER_00
What is the age of the universe and what is the earliest time we got those salty delicious soup, clump soups with heavy elements?
0
SPEAKER_01
Well, the universe is 13.8 billion years old.
0
SPEAKER_00
Allegedly, yeah.
0
SPEAKER_00
Is it, so?
0
SPEAKER_00
Okay, 13 brilliant scientists.
0
SPEAKER_01
Well, you know, when I was in high school, the universe was 20 billion years old.
0
SPEAKER_00
Oh yeah, so the estimate.
0
SPEAKER_01
Things have changed.
0
SPEAKER_00
Do you think that estimate will evolve in interesting ways or no?
0
SPEAKER_00
Is it pretty stable at this point?
0
SPEAKER_01
I think we have mostly converged, yes, because the techniques are very different now, much more precise.
0
SPEAKER_01
The whole business of precision cosmology by mapping out the cosmic microwave background, you know, that s a marvelous feat.
0
SPEAKER_01
Maybe the digits will still move around a little bit, but that s all right.
0
SPEAKER_00
Plus the gravitational waves and all that, so all the different sources of data kind of mapping out this detailed picture of the early universe.
0
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, totally.
0
SPEAKER_01
And so we think the earliest little stars formed, I don t know, maybe half a billion years after the Big Bang, right?
0
SPEAKER_01
Again, a few hundred million years.
0
SPEAKER_01
for the first stars to emerge and then, you know, took some time, so give or take half a billion years.
0
SPEAKER_01
And that was the time when sort of the very first proto-galaxies formed, early stellar structures, stellar systems from which the Milky Way eventually formed, right?
0
SPEAKER_01
So it was
0
SPEAKER_01
The Mickey was probably a bigger, slightly bigger one.
0
SPEAKER_01
And we know today that galaxies grow hierarchically, which means they eat their smaller neighbors.
0
SPEAKER_01
So if you re the bigger one and have a few friends around, you re just gonna eat them.
0
SPEAKER_01
absorb them, and then you grow bigger.
0
SPEAKER_01
And so all these little early stars, you know, kind of came into the Milky Way through that kind of process.
0
SPEAKER_01
And that s why we find them in the outer parts of the galaxy today, because they re just kind of, they ve been just left there since.
0
SPEAKER_00
So the old stuff is on the outskirts of the galaxy and the new stuff is closer to the middle?
0
SPEAKER_00
Is there?
0
SPEAKER_01
Broadly speaking, yes.
0
SPEAKER_00
So that s where you would look for it.
0
SPEAKER_00
So maybe just to step back, what is a galaxy?
0
SPEAKER_00
What is a protogalaxy?
0
SPEAKER_01
I love that question.
0
SPEAKER_01
So the galaxy is a huge assembly of stars.
0
SPEAKER_01
The Milky Way contains something like 200 to 400 billion stars.
0
SPEAKER_01
And most of the material and the stars are in the disk.
0
SPEAKER_01
And when we look at the night sky, what we see as the Milky Way band on the sky, that is actually the next inner spiral arm, because we actually live in a spiral disk galaxy, so the Milky Way is a spiral disk galaxy.
0
SPEAKER_01
And we re looking, actually it depends a little bit in the northern hemisphere, we re looking out of the galaxy, so we re seeing the next outer spiral arm.
0
SPEAKER_01
And as you can imagine, there s only dark space behind that, so we don t see it all that nice on the sky, but if you travel to the Southern Hemisphere, let s say South America, you see the Milky Way and it looks so different on the sky because that s the next inner spiral arm and that s backlit by the galactic center.
0
SPEAKER_01
The galactic center is a very big, puffy,
0
SPEAKER_01
you know, region of gas, there s a lot of star formation, the galactic party is happening there.
0
SPEAKER_01
So it s very bright, and it makes for this very beautiful Milky Way on the night sky that we see.
0
SPEAKER_01
So actually, if you ever get the chance to experience that, I encourage you to
0
SPEAKER_01
almost like close your eyes while seeing this and imagining that you re sitting in this kind of disk, in this pancake, and you re just kind of looking right into it.
0
SPEAKER_01
And you can really feel that we re in this 2D disk.
0
SPEAKER_01
And then you can imagine that there s a top and a bottom and that we re really part of the galaxy.
0
SPEAKER_01
You can really experience that.
0
SPEAKER_01
We re not just lost in space somewhere, but we re really a part of it.
0
SPEAKER_01
And, you know, knowing a little bit about the structure of the Miku really helps.
0
SPEAKER_00
Do you feel small when you think about that?
0
SPEAKER_00
When you look on that spiral on the inside of the Milky Way and then you look out to the outside.
0
SPEAKER_00
How are we supposed to feel?
0
SPEAKER_01
I don t know.
0
SPEAKER_01
I don t feel small necessarily.
0
SPEAKER_01
I feel in awe and I feel I m a part of it because I can really feel that I m a part of it.
0
SPEAKER_01
I think for many people they think like, oh, there s just the planet and then there s nothing.
0
SPEAKER_01
And that s almost a little bit sad.
0
SPEAKER_01
That s really not the case, right?
0
SPEAKER_01
Because there s so much more and I really like to imagine, wow, I m sitting in this big galactic merry-go-round and we re going around the center and I can see the center above me, right?
0
SPEAKER_01
And I can almost feel like we re going there.
0
SPEAKER_01
Of course, we can t really feel that, but the sun does circle the galactic center.
0
SPEAKER_00
But there s a kind of sadness to like looking pictures of a nice vacation place.
0
SPEAKER_00
All we get is that light, an old light.
0
SPEAKER_00
Do you feel like sad that we don t get to travel or you and I will not get to travel there and maybe humans will never get to travel there?
0
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, I always wanted to travel into space and see the Earth and other things from up there.
0
SPEAKER_01
There s certainly that, but I don t know.
0
SPEAKER_01
It s also okay to just be at our vantage point and see it from here.
0
SPEAKER_00
with the sensors, with the telescopes that we have and explore the possibility.
0
SPEAKER_00
I mean, there is a kind of wonder to the mystery of it all, what s out there, what interesting things that we can t possibly imagine.
0
SPEAKER_00
There could be all kinds of life forms, bacteria, all this kind of stuff.
0
SPEAKER_00
I tend to believe that,
0
SPEAKER_00
you know, it depends on the day.
0
SPEAKER_00
I tend to believe there s just a lot of very primitive organisms just spread out throughout, and they build their little things like bacteria type organisms.
0
SPEAKER_00
And just to think what kind of worlds there are, because they re probably really creative living organisms.
0
SPEAKER_00
Because the conditions, I guess the question I m wondering to myself when I look out there to the stars, how different are the conditions on the different planets that orbit those stars?
0
SPEAKER_01
will definitely be very different.
0
SPEAKER_01
I mean, the variety out there is huge.
0
SPEAKER_01
We know now that I think it s about every other star has at least one planet.
0
SPEAKER_01
I already mentioned the number of stars in the galaxy.
0
SPEAKER_01
I mean, it s a huge number of planets out there, so who knows what that looks like.
0
SPEAKER_01
All we know is that there is a lot of variety we don t quite yet understand.
1
SPEAKER_00
and what drives that, what governs that, why that is the case, why is it not all one size fits all.
1
SPEAKER_00
So.
1
SPEAKER_01
Oh, you mean the dynamics of planet formation, like exoplanet formation or star formation, the whole shebang?
1
SPEAKER_00
All of it, all of it.
1
SPEAKER_00
Star formation remains a much researched topic.
1
SPEAKER_00
We definitely know that it works.
1
SPEAKER_00
I m sure.
1
SPEAKER_00
Because all the stars are there.
1
SPEAKER_00
Same for the planets.
1
SPEAKER_00
But the details are so varied per gas cloud, right?
1
SPEAKER_00
It s very hard to come up with very detailed prescriptions.
1
SPEAKER_00
Broadly, we have figured it out.
1
SPEAKER_00
You need a gas cloud, you need to cool it, something clumps and fragments and somehow it makes a star with planets or without.
1
SPEAKER_01
But the dynamics of the clumping process is not fully understood.
1
SPEAKER_00
No, no, and the local conditions are so varied, right?
1
SPEAKER_00
I mean, it s the same with, you know, all people look like people, but individually we look very different.
1
SPEAKER_01
So even the subtle diversity of the formation process creates all kinds of fun differences.
1
SPEAKER_00
Yes, so we just don t know how this turned out in an individual case and it s kind of hard to figure it all out and to take a look, certainly with planets, right?
1
SPEAKER_00
The chance to ever actually take a picture of a planet is minuscule because they don t shine, so they re really dark.
1
SPEAKER_00
So I d say there s a lot of possibility out there
1
SPEAKER_01
but we have to be a little bit more patient before we- Yeah, or come up with technologies where patience becomes less necessary by extending our lifetimes or increasing the speed of space travel, all that kind of stuff.
1
SPEAKER_01
Humans are pretty intelligent.
1
SPEAKER_01
They re pretty- Sometimes, yeah.
1
SPEAKER_01
for the most part, I hope, on the optimistic days.
1
SPEAKER_01
Well, maybe just to linger on what a galaxy is, what should we know about our understanding of black holes in the formation?
1
SPEAKER_01
Is that an important thing to understand in the formation of a galaxy?
1
SPEAKER_01
So all the orbiting, all the spiraling that s going on, how important is that to understand?
1
SPEAKER_00
all of the above.
1
SPEAKER_00
That s what makes astronomy really hard but also really interesting, right?
1
SPEAKER_00
No day is like another because we always find something new.
1
SPEAKER_00
I want to come back to the idea of the proto-galaxy because it actually matches or relates to the black hole formation.
1
SPEAKER_00
So most large, well pretty much all large galaxies have a supermassive black hole in the center and
1
SPEAKER_00
We don t actually know, we don t really know where they come from.
1
SPEAKER_00
Again, we know that they are there, but how do we get there?
1
SPEAKER_00
So we go back to the early universe, right?
1
SPEAKER_00
We had a little galaxy that just sort of, you know, I don t know, had some small number of stars.
1
SPEAKER_00
It was the first gravitationally bound structure that was held together by dark matter because dark matter actually kind of
1
SPEAKER_00
structured up first before the luminous matter could, because that s what dark matter kind of does.
1
SPEAKER_00
And it started to hold gas and then stars sort of together in these first very shallow, what we call potential wells, so these gravitationally bound systems.
1
SPEAKER_00
And then the Milky Way grew from absorbing neighboring smaller, even smaller systems.
1
SPEAKER_00
And somewhere in that process,
1
SPEAKER_00
there must have been a seed for one of these supermassive black holes.
1
SPEAKER_00
And I m not actually sure that it s clear right now what was their first, the supermassive black hole or the galaxy.
1
SPEAKER_00
So lots of people are trying to study that.
1
SPEAKER_00
And of course, the black hole wasn t as massive back then as it is these days.
1
SPEAKER_00
But it s a big area of research, and the new James Webb JWT, the telescope, the Infrared Telescope in Space, many people are working on that to figure out exactly what happened.
1
SPEAKER_00
And there are some surprising results that we really don t understand right now.
1
SPEAKER_01
So to solve the chicken or the egg problem of do you need a supermassive black hole to form a galaxy or does the galaxy naturally create the supermassive black hole?
1
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, yeah.
1
SPEAKER_00
I mean, I think to some degree we can answer that because there are lots of little dwarf galaxies out there.
1
SPEAKER_00
The Milky Way remains surrounded by many dozens of small dwarf galaxies.
1
SPEAKER_00
I have studied a bunch of them.
1
SPEAKER_00
And to the extent that we can tell, they do not contain black holes.
1
SPEAKER_00
So, there certainly were gravitationally bound structures, so either you can call them proto-galaxies or dwarf galaxies or first galaxies.
1
SPEAKER_00
They were definitely there, but there must have been bigger things, like the Proto-Milky Way, where something was different, right?
1
SPEAKER_00
What made them more massive so that, you know, they would gravitationally attract these smaller systems to integrate them.
1
SPEAKER_00
So, we ll have to see.
1
SPEAKER_01
How do we look into that, into the dynamics of the formation, the evolution of the portal galaxies?
1
SPEAKER_01
Is it possible?
1
SPEAKER_01
Do they shine?
1
SPEAKER_01
I mean, what are the set of data that we can possibly look at?
1
SPEAKER_01
So we ve got gravitational waves, which is really insane that we can even detect those.
1
SPEAKER_01
There s light.
1
SPEAKER_01
What else can we...
1
SPEAKER_00
So that would fall into the category of observational cosmology and the JWST is the prime telescope right now and it promises big, big steps forward.
1
SPEAKER_00
This is in its early days because it s only been online like a year or so.
1
SPEAKER_00
But that collects the infrared light from the furthest
1
SPEAKER_00
like literally proto-galaxies, earliest galaxies, that light has traveled some 13 billion years to us, and they re observing these faint little blobs.
1
SPEAKER_00
And folks are trying to, again, study the onset of these early supermassive black holes, how they shape galaxies, so they re seeing that
1
SPEAKER_00
They were there, you know, surrounded by already bigger galaxies.
1
SPEAKER_00
Ideally, I d like for my colleagues to push a little bit further.
1
SPEAKER_00
Hopefully, that will eventually happen.
1
SPEAKER_01
in terms of looking towards older and older ones.
1
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, more and more sort of primitive in terms of the structure, but of course, as you can imagine, if you make your system smaller and smaller, it becomes dimmer and dimmer, and it s further and further away, so we re reaching the end of the line from a technical perspective pretty quickly.
1
SPEAKER_01
But it s dimmer and dimmer means older and older.
1
SPEAKER_00
Yes, in a sense, because it all started really small, right?
1
SPEAKER_01
Because it s smaller and smaller, which correlates to older and older.
1
SPEAKER_00
In that phase of the universe, it would, otherwise it doesn t, yeah.
1
SPEAKER_01
Just to take a small attention about black holes, and you know, because you do quite a bit of observational cosmology and maybe experimental astrophysics,
1
SPEAKER_01
What s the difference to you between theoretical physics and experimental?
1
SPEAKER_01
So there s a lot of really interesting explorations about paradoxes around black holes and all this kind of stuff, about black holes destroying information.
1
SPEAKER_01
Do those worlds intermix to you, especially when you step away from your work and kind of think about the mystery of it all?
1
SPEAKER_00
Well, at first glance, there isn t actually much crosstalk.
1
SPEAKER_00
Personally, I mostly observe stars, so I don t usually actually think too much about black holes.
1
SPEAKER_01
And stars is a fundamentally kind of chemical, physical phenomena that doesn t... That s right, the physics is kind of different.
1
SPEAKER_00
It s not extreme.
1
SPEAKER_00
I mean, you know, you could consider nuclear fusion sort of be perhaps extreme, you need to tunnel
1
SPEAKER_00
There s some interesting physics there, but it s just a different flavor and I don t do these kinds of calculations myself either.
1
SPEAKER_00
I very much like to talk with my theory colleagues about these things though because I find there s always an interesting intersection and
1
SPEAKER_00
I ve written a number of papers with colleagues who do simulations about galaxies and so they re not quite as far removed as let s say the black hole pen and paper folks.
1
SPEAKER_00
But even in those cases, we had the same interests and the same topics, but it was almost like we re speaking two different languages.
1
SPEAKER_00
And we weren t even that far removed, you know, both astronomers and all.
1
SPEAKER_00
And it was really interesting just to take the time and really try to talk to each other.
1
SPEAKER_00
And it s amazing how
1
SPEAKER_00
how hard that is.
1
SPEAKER_00
Even amongst scientists, we already have trouble talking to each other.
1
SPEAKER_00
Imagine how hard it is to talk to non-scientists and other people.
1
SPEAKER_00
We re all interested in the same things as humans at the end of the day, right?
1
SPEAKER_00
But everyone has sort of a different
1
SPEAKER_00
angle about it and different questions and way of formulating things.
1
SPEAKER_00
And sometimes it really takes a while to converge and to get to the common ground.
1
SPEAKER_00
But if you take the time, it s so interesting to participate in that process.
1
SPEAKER_00
And it feels so good in the end to say like, yes, we tackled this together, right?
1
SPEAKER_00
We overcame our differences, not so much in opinion, but just in expressing ourselves about this and how we go about solving a problem.
1
SPEAKER_00
And these were some of my most successful papers, and I certainly enjoyed them the most.
1
SPEAKER_01
It could also lead to big discoveries.
1
SPEAKER_01
I mean, there s a, I think you put it really well in saying that we re all kind of studying the same kind of mysteries and problems.
1
SPEAKER_01
I mean, I see this in the space of artificial intelligence.
1
SPEAKER_01
You have a community maybe, it seems very far away, artificial intelligence and neuroscience.
1
SPEAKER_01
You know, you would think that they re studying very different things, but one is trying to engineer intelligence, and in so doing, try to understand intelligence.
1
SPEAKER_01
And the other is trying to understand intelligence and cognition in the human mind, and they re just doing it from a different set of data, a different set of backgrounds, and the researchers that do that kind of work.
1
SPEAKER_01
And probably the same is true in observational cosmology and simulation.
1
SPEAKER_01
So it s like a fundamentally different approach to understanding the universe.
1
SPEAKER_01
Let me use, for simulation, let me use the things I know to create a bunch of parameters and create some, just play with it.
1
SPEAKER_01
Play with the universe.
1
SPEAKER_01
Play God.
1
SPEAKER_01
Create a bunch of universes and see in a way that matches experimental data.
1
SPEAKER_01
It s a fun, it s like playing Sims, but at the cosmic level.
1
SPEAKER_01
And then probably the set of terminology used there is very different.
1
SPEAKER_01
And maybe you re allowed to break the rules a little bit more.
1
SPEAKER_01
Let s have, you know, yeah, it s like the Drake equation.
1
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, you don t really know.
1
SPEAKER_01
You kind of come up with a bunch of values here and there.
1
SPEAKER_01
And just see how it evolves.
1
SPEAKER_01
And from that, kind of intuit the different possibilities, the dynamics of the evolution of a galaxy, for example.
1
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, but it s cool to play between those two.
1
SPEAKER_01
Because it seems like we understand so little about our cosmos.
1
SPEAKER_01
So it s good to play.
1
SPEAKER_00
Yes, it s like a big sandbox, right?
1
SPEAKER_00
And everyone kind of has their little corner and they do things, but we re all in the same sandbox together at the end of the day.
1
SPEAKER_01
And that sandbox does have super powerful and super expensive telescopes that everybody s also, all the children are fighting for the resources to make sure they get to ask the right questions using that big cool tool.
1
SPEAKER_01
Can we actually step back on the big field of stellar archeology?
1
SPEAKER_01
What is this process?
1
SPEAKER_01
Can you just speak to it again?
1
SPEAKER_01
You ve been speaking to it, but what is this process of archeology in the cosmos?
1
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, it s really fascinating.
1
SPEAKER_00
So, I mentioned the lesser the mass of the star, the longer it lives.
1
SPEAKER_00
And again, for reference, for the next dinner party, the Sun s lifetime is 10 billion years.
1
SPEAKER_00
So, if you have a star that s 0.6 or 0.8 solar masses, then its lifetime is going to be 15 to 20 billion years.
1
SPEAKER_00
And that s an important range for our conversation because, again, if you assume that such a small star formed soon after the Big Bang, then it is still observable today.
1
SPEAKER_00
You mentioned old light before.
1
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, that light is like a few thousand years old, but compared to the age of these stars, it s nothing.
1
SPEAKER_00
So to me, that s young.
1
SPEAKER_00
It comes straight from our galaxy.
1
SPEAKER_00
These stars are not far away.
1
SPEAKER_00
They re in our galaxy.
1
SPEAKER_00
in the outskirts, they probably did not form in the galaxy, because, again, hierarchical assembly of a Milky Way meant... They were eaten.
1
SPEAKER_00
Exactly.
1
SPEAKER_00
They formed in a little other galaxy in the vicinity, and at some point the Milky Way ate that, which means it absorbed all the stars, including these little old stars that are now in the outskirts of the Milky Way that I used to point my telescope to.
1
SPEAKER_00
What can we learn from these stars?
1
SPEAKER_00
Why should we study them?
1
SPEAKER_00
Now, these little stars are really, really efficient with their energy consumption.
1
SPEAKER_00
They are still burning, for the experts, just burning hydrogen to helium in their cores, and they have done so for the past 12, 13 billion years, however old they are, and they re going to keep doing that for another few billion years, same as the Sun.
1
SPEAKER_00
The Sun also just does hydrogen to helium burning and will continue that for a while.
1
SPEAKER_00
which means the outer parts of the star, well, pretty much actually most of the star, that gas doesn t talk to the core.
1
SPEAKER_00
So whatever composition that star has in its outer layers is exactly the same as the gas composition from which the star formed.
1
SPEAKER_00
which means it has perfectly preserved that information from way back then all the way to today and going forward.
1
SPEAKER_00
So I m a stellar archaeologist because I don t dig in the dirt to find remnants of past civilizations and whatnot.
1
SPEAKER_00
I dig for the old stars in the sky because they have preserved that information from the first billion years in their outer stellar atmosphere, which is what I m observing with telescopes.
1
SPEAKER_00
So I m getting the best look at the chemical composition early on that you could possibly wish for.
1
SPEAKER_01
What kind of age are we talking about here?
1
SPEAKER_01
Are we talking about something that s close to that, like a 13 billion, 12, 13 billion age range?
1
SPEAKER_00
That s what we think.
1
SPEAKER_00
Now, as a small caveat here, we cannot...
1
SPEAKER_00
accurately date these stars, but we use a trick to say, oh, these stars must have formed as some of the earliest generations of stars, because we need to talk about the chemical evolution of the universe and the Milky Way for a second.
1
SPEAKER_00
So I already mentioned the
1
SPEAKER_00
the pristineness of the universe after the Big Bang, right?
1
SPEAKER_00
Just hydrogen and helium.
1
SPEAKER_00
Then the first stars formed, they produced a sprinkle of heavier elements up to iron.
1
SPEAKER_00
Then the next generation of stars formed, that included again massive stars that they would explode again, but also the little ones that keep on living, right?
1
SPEAKER_00
And then the massive ones again explode as supernova, so they provide again another sprinkle of heavier elements.
1
SPEAKER_00
And so over time, all the elements in the periodic table have been built up.
1
SPEAKER_00
There have been other processes, for example, neutron-star mergers and other exotic supernovae that have provided elements heavier than iron all the way up to uranium from very early on.
1
SPEAKER_00
We re still trying to figure out those details, but
1
SPEAKER_00
I always say pretty much all the elements were done from day three.
1
SPEAKER_01
So iron is where, once you get to iron, you got all the fun you need, most of the fun.
1
SPEAKER_00
Yes, I know.
1
SPEAKER_00
I really like the heavier elements, gold, silver, platinum, that kind of stuff.
1
SPEAKER_01
For personal reasons or for star formation?
1
SPEAKER_00
Well, both.
1
SPEAKER_01
What s the importance of these heavier metals in the evolution of the stars?
1
SPEAKER_00
So they re the spice of life, right?
1
SPEAKER_00
So every supernova gives you elements up to iron.
1
SPEAKER_00
That s cool, but at some point it gets a little bit boring.
2
SPEAKER_02
Because that always works.
2
SPEAKER_02
But that s the baseline.
2
SPEAKER_02
We need that.
2
SPEAKER_02
And that s certainly what came out of the first stars and then all the other supernova explosions that followed with every generation.
2
SPEAKER_02
And it took about a thousand generations, give or take.
2
SPEAKER_02
until the Sun was made.
2
SPEAKER_02
So the Sun formed from a gas cloud that was enriched by roughly 1,000 generations of supernova explosions, and that s why the Sun has the chemical composition that it has, and somehow the planets were made from that as well.
2
SPEAKER_00
So the supernova explosions, the many generations are creating more and more complex elements.
2
SPEAKER_02
No, it just goes all the way up to iron, and then it s a little bit more of all of these elements.
2
SPEAKER_01
Just more.
2
SPEAKER_02
Yeah, it s one sprinkle, then another, and it just kinda adds up, right?
2
SPEAKER_02
Now, the heavy elements form in very different ways.
2
SPEAKER_02
They are not fusion-made, they are made typically through neutron capture processes, but for that you need seed nuclei.
2
SPEAKER_02
ideally, you know, iron or carbon or something.
2
SPEAKER_02
So the supernova-made elements are very good seed nuclei for other processes that then create heavy elements.
2
SPEAKER_02
And because they cannot be made everywhere, they, when you, when, you know, so I, some of my stars have huge amounts of these heavy elements in them.
2
SPEAKER_02
And they tell us in much more detail, something really interesting happened
2
SPEAKER_02
somewhere.
2
SPEAKER_00
Well, wait, I thought the really old ones we would not have.
2
SPEAKER_00
So what does that mean if the old?
2
SPEAKER_02
Ah, yes, important clarification.
2
SPEAKER_02
So the stars that we are observing today, these old ones, they formed from the gas.
2
SPEAKER_02
And the question is, what enriched that gas?
2
SPEAKER_02
So it could have been just a first star dumping their elements into that gas all the way up to iron.
2
SPEAKER_02
And we have found some stars that we think are second-generation stars.
2
SPEAKER_02
So they form from gas enriched by just one first star.
2
SPEAKER_02
That s super cool.
2
SPEAKER_02
Then we find other old stars that have a much more complicated heavy element signature, and that means, okay, they re probably formed in a gas cloud that had a few things going on, such as maybe a first star, maybe another more normal supernova, and maybe some kind of special process like a neutron star merger that would make heavy elements.
2
SPEAKER_02
And so they created a local chemical signature from which the next generation star then formed.
2
SPEAKER_02
And that is what we re observing today.
2
SPEAKER_02
So all these old stars basically carry the signature from all these progenitor events.
2
SPEAKER_02
And it s our job then to unravel, okay, which processes and which events and how many may have occurred in the early universe that led to exactly that signature that we observe 13 billion years later.
2
SPEAKER_00
Is it possible to figure out the number of generations that resulted in these stars?
2
SPEAKER_02
Well, we think we can sort of say, okay, this was like second generation or third, because the amounts of heavy elements in the stars that we observe is so tiny.
2
SPEAKER_02
One normal supernova explosion is actually already basically too much.
2
SPEAKER_02
It would give us too much of it.
2
SPEAKER_02
And the thing is, you can never take away things in the universe, you can only add.
2
SPEAKER_02
There s no cosmic vacuum cleaner going around sucking things away.
2
SPEAKER_02
The black holes are probably the closest to that, but they would have taken the whole star.
2
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, they d take the whole thing, not just a little bit of it.
2
SPEAKER_02
They wouldn t take stuff out of the gas, you know.
2
SPEAKER_02
So we have maybe 10 stars or so now where we are saying that they contain so little of these heavy elements that there must be second generation because
2
SPEAKER_02
How else would you have made them?
2
SPEAKER_02
And again, I wanna stress that the elements that we observe in these stars were not made by the stars themselves that we observe.
2
SPEAKER_02
That s just a reflection of the gas cloud.
2
SPEAKER_02
So we don t actually, I had to say that because I love stars.
2
SPEAKER_02
At the end of the day, we don t really care for the stars that we re observing.
2
SPEAKER_02
We care for the story that they re telling us about the early universe.
2
SPEAKER_00
So yeah, so the stars are kind of a small mirror into the early universe.
2
SPEAKER_02
Yeah, yeah.
2
SPEAKER_00
And so what are you detecting about those stars?
2
SPEAKER_00
Can you tell me about the process of archeology here?
2
SPEAKER_00
Like what kind of data can we possibly get to tell the story about these heavy elements on the stars?
2
SPEAKER_02
Yeah, it depends really on what star you find.
2
SPEAKER_02
There are many different chemical signatures.
2
SPEAKER_02
We actually pair up these days our element signatures with also kinematic information, how the star moves about the galaxy.
2
SPEAKER_02
That actually gives us clues as to where the star might have come from.
2
SPEAKER_02
Because again, all these old stars are in the galaxy, but they are not off the galaxy.
2
SPEAKER_02
That s a small but important distinction, so they all came from somewhere else.
2
SPEAKER_00
So you can rewind back in time to kind of estimate where it came from.
2
SPEAKER_02
Yeah, so we can t really say, oh, it came from that dwarf galaxy, but interestingly enough, just a few days ago, I submitted a paper with three women undergrads.
2
SPEAKER_02
It was so good to work together, and we found a sample of stars that have very, very low abundances in strontium and barium, so very heavy elements.
2
SPEAKER_02
And I had a hunch for a while that these stars would probably be some of the oldest because, as I said, heavy elements give you extra information about special events.
2
SPEAKER_02
And again, finding something that s really low means that must have happened either really
2
SPEAKER_02
early on or in a very special environment, right, because we can only ever add.
2
SPEAKER_02
So if you find something that s incredibly low in terms of the abundance, maybe just one event contributed that max.
2
SPEAKER_02
We looked at the kinematics, how are these stars moving, and they re all going the wrong way in the galaxy.
2
SPEAKER_02
How is that possible?
2
SPEAKER_02
Well, it is possible because consider, now we come back to the proto-galaxy, the proto-galaxy was like a beehive, it just didn t really know what it was or what it wanted to become when it grew up.
2
SPEAKER_02
So, and it was absorbing all these little galaxies to grow fast.
2
SPEAKER_02
Some galaxies, some absorbed galaxies were thrown in going the main way and some came in the wrong way, huh?
2
SPEAKER_02
Happens.
2
SPEAKER_02
But this could only happen early on when there wasn t left and right and up and down, so stuff would come in from all ways.
2
SPEAKER_02
So now, 13 billion years later, we re looking… They re still doing it.
2
SPEAKER_02
Yeah, A, they re still doing it, and B, we just looked for stars that have low strontium and barium abundances.
2
SPEAKER_02
And then we look at the kinematics, and lo and behold, they re all at hundreds of kilometers per second going the wrong way.
2
SPEAKER_02
It s like, dude, you must have come in really early on from somewhere else.
2
SPEAKER_02
So we call this retrograde motion.
2
SPEAKER_02
That s a clear sign of accretion, so something that has come into the galaxy.
2
SPEAKER_02
And because they are so fast, and it s really all of them, that must have happened early on, right?
2
SPEAKER_02
You can t throw a galaxy
2
SPEAKER_02
into the Mickey Ray right now the wrong way.
2
SPEAKER_02
It eventually will turn around.
2
SPEAKER_00
Can you actually just in a small tangent speak to the three women undergrads?
2
SPEAKER_00
It s pretty cool that you were able to use a hunch to find this really cool little star.
2
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, what s the process like, especially with undergrads?
2
SPEAKER_00
I think that would be very interesting and inspiring to people.
2
SPEAKER_02
Yes, it was a wonderful little collaboration that actually emerged in the fall.
2
SPEAKER_02
I really like working with undergrads and grad students, postdocs, and I came up with a new concept for a class at MIT where I wanted to integrate the research process into the classroom.
2
SPEAKER_02
Because sometimes people find it really hard to call, email a professor, hey, you know, I m this and that person and I m interested in your research, could I possibly, you know, come?
2
SPEAKER_02
And I wanted to streamline that and give, not just trial, how it would work to provide sort of the safe confines of a classroom where you just sign up and do research in a very structured way.
2
SPEAKER_02
And I developed it, it was a lot of work, a little bit more than I thought, to map up an entire research project basically from scratch in 10 worksheets so that they could do it again in a very structured and organized fashion.
2
SPEAKER_00
Oh, so you created this whole framework for them to do it?
2
SPEAKER_02
Yes, the whole thing.
2
SPEAKER_02
But the promise was,
2
SPEAKER_02
You come sign up for my class, in teams of two, you each get your own old star that has not been analyzed before.
2
SPEAKER_02
I don t know what the solution is, because in research, we don t look up the solution at the end of the book.
2
SPEAKER_02
We do not know what we re going to find.
2
SPEAKER_02
Our job is to do the work and then to interpret the numbers, because our job as scientists is to find the story.
2
SPEAKER_02
Anyone can crunch numbers.
2
SPEAKER_02
Anyone.
2
SPEAKER_01
It s complicated sometimes, but it s doable, right?
2
SPEAKER_02
But coming up with a story, when you only have three puzzle pieces, what does the puzzle look like?
2
SPEAKER_02
You have to be a little bit bold, you need to have some experience, and you need to kind of see the universe in 3D.
2
SPEAKER_02
You just need to kind of go for it.
2
SPEAKER_02
And that s the beautiful thing.
2
SPEAKER_02
I really love that.
2
SPEAKER_00
And so this was a story of weird kinematics going the wrong way combined with this particular weird signature in terms of the heavy elements.
2
SPEAKER_00
And you have to come up with a story about that.
2
SPEAKER_02
Yes, and so the story of that paper is now, usually I don t say I found it.
2
SPEAKER_02
find the oldest stars, when I talk to my research colleagues, I talk to them about we find the chemically most pristine stars because that s actually what we measure, the chemical abundance that tells us, okay, it must have been second or third or fifth generation of stars, right?
2
SPEAKER_02
But these low strontium stars that go in the wrong way, like they re getting paid for it, they must be the oldest stars that came into the galaxy because they formed before the galaxy
2
SPEAKER_02
was the Milky Way, right?
2
SPEAKER_02
And it s so cool and it was so wonderful.
2
SPEAKER_02
So this class, it went so well in the fall.
2
SPEAKER_02
I had nine people sign up.
2
SPEAKER_02
That s not unusual for a class, a specialty class at MIT, so small number.
2
SPEAKER_02
It was eight women and they were so into it that I said, okay,
2
SPEAKER_02
Let s use this opportunity.
2
SPEAKER_02
You re gonna do some extra work with me, and we re gonna publish this.
2
SPEAKER_00
Try to publish.
2
SPEAKER_02
Yes.
2
SPEAKER_00
I also like that you re using the terminology of chemically more pristine.
2
SPEAKER_00
When I m talking to younger people, I ll just say that I m more chemically pristine than them.
2
SPEAKER_00
I like that description of age.
2
SPEAKER_00
So there s this term of metal-poor stars.
2
SPEAKER_00
So most of these old stars are going to be metal-poor.
2
SPEAKER_02
Yes, I search for the most metal-poor stars.
2
SPEAKER_00
And what does that, can we just define?
2
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, what does that mean?
2
SPEAKER_02
I don t know who came up with this, I would love to know, but...
2
SPEAKER_02
The universe is a complicated place, so many decades ago, someone clever came up with the idea to say, let s simplify things a little bit.
2
SPEAKER_02
Let s call hydrogen X, helium Y, and all the other elements combined, metals, Z. When I give public talks, I always ask, is there a chemist in the audience?
2
SPEAKER_02
Let me just tell you, neon is a wonderful metal.
2
SPEAKER_02
And they re like, oh my god, what s she saying?
2
SPEAKER_02
But I m an astronomer, I m not a chemist, so I ll get away with it.
2
SPEAKER_02
So if you just roll with it for a moment, all the elements except hydrogen and helium are called metals.
2
SPEAKER_02
Now, if we look again at the concept of chemical evolution, it means more and more of all the elements, everything higher than hydrogen and helium, gets produced slowly but surely by different types of source and events.
2
SPEAKER_02
So that s a monotonously increasing function.
2
SPEAKER_02
And so we look for the stars that have the least amounts of heavy elements in them, because that means we are going further and further back in this process, in that function, almost all the way to the very beginning, and that is the first stars, right?
2
SPEAKER_02
They started that.
2
SPEAKER_02
that process.
2
SPEAKER_02
That s why I said it was such an important transition phase because we call the post-Big Bang universe pristine, just hydrogen and helium, and after that the mess started.
2
SPEAKER_02
As soon as you add elements to it, things kind of get a little out of hand.
2
SPEAKER_02
That ends in this beautiful variety that we have everywhere these days.
2
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, and you re looking at the very early days of the introduction of the variety.
2
SPEAKER_02
Yes, exactly, when it was still a little bit more organizable.
2
SPEAKER_02
But the variety of different types of metal pore stars we have is stark.
2
SPEAKER_02
Many different types of stars, many patterns we have sort of identified, but there are still crazy ones out there that we re still trying to kind of fit in.
2
SPEAKER_00
So what kind of stars have been discovered?
2
SPEAKER_00
So you ve, already a while ago, helped discover the star HE13272326, great name.
2
SPEAKER_00
And HE15230901.
2
SPEAKER_00
What can you say about these stars and others that have been found?
2
SPEAKER_02
I love them.
2
SPEAKER_02
They re my baby stars.
2
SPEAKER_00
What do you call your baby stars?
2
SPEAKER_00
Is there cute names?
2
SPEAKER_02
Well, I m probably the only one who can spit out these names without cheating.
2
SPEAKER_00
Are there nicknames?
2
SPEAKER_00
Are there nicknames?
2
SPEAKER_02
Well, no, that s... It s not allowed?
2
SPEAKER_02
Okay.
2
SPEAKER_02
Well, some colleagues at conferences have just called them Anna Star or Freebel Star because they didn t want to learn the phone number.
2
SPEAKER_02
I get it.
2
SPEAKER_00
The phone number, yeah.
2
SPEAKER_02
These numbers are actually based on older sets of coordinates for these stars.
2
SPEAKER_02
So yes, the minus in the middle means that they re in the southern hemisphere, so negative is in the southern hemisphere, positive is in the northern.
2
SPEAKER_02
And then 13 and 15 means they re sort of observable in the middle of the year.
2
SPEAKER_00
Okay, so that s to do with the observation and where it was observed and that kind of stuff.
2
SPEAKER_02
Yes, yes, yes.
2
SPEAKER_02
But they have very different stars, both absolutely significant, career-defining actually for me, but really pushed the envelope in very different ways.
2
SPEAKER_02
So HG 1327, the first one that you mentioned, that was the second, second-generation star that we found.
2
SPEAKER_02
And, you know, usually people say like, oh, the first one is the big one and the rest is nobody cares.
2
SPEAKER_02
But to us, it proved that yes, we can do it.
2
SPEAKER_02
Because one, astronomers live in this sort of way of, you know, there are a lot of serendipitous discoveries.
2
SPEAKER_02
that s really great, but we need to show that we can do it again.
2
SPEAKER_00
Reliably.
2
SPEAKER_02
Because then we re onto something, and it s not just some kind of weird quirk, and there are a lot of quirks in the universe, but we want to know, is that a real thing?
2
SPEAKER_02
Does that happen regularly?
2
SPEAKER_02
Is there something that we can learn?
2
SPEAKER_02
Is that a piece of the story?
2
SPEAKER_02
And so finding the second one that was even a little bit more extreme than the first one really showed, yes, our search techniques work, we can find these stars,
2
SPEAKER_02
they provide an important part to the story in the sense that if we had more than two stars, and by now we have about ten or so, what do they tell us about the nature of the very first stars?
2
SPEAKER_02
And what we found, again working with the theorists, of course, who run these supernova models, is that, so actually let me, before I get into this, these two stars had huge amounts of carbon relative to iron.
2
SPEAKER_02
So we usually use iron as a reference element for what we call the metallicity, so the overall metal content, the overall amount of heavy elements in it.
2
SPEAKER_00
So that s why it s called iron deficiency.
3
SPEAKER_00
So these stars are incredibly iron deficient which means they must be of the second generation because there was, and interestingly enough, there was this discrepancy
3
SPEAKER_00
A normal supernovae, until then, we thought would get us so much iron, you know, and you would distribute that in the gas cloud and then you would form this little star that we re observing.
3
SPEAKER_00
But the iron abundance that we measured was actually much lower than that.
3
SPEAKER_00
And I already mentioned, you can t take things away.
3
SPEAKER_00
that must mean these early massive POP3, we call them Population 3, the first stars, they must have exploded in a different way than we previously thought.
3
SPEAKER_00
They can t output as much iron because they just can t.
3
SPEAKER_00
Otherwise it wouldn t match our observations.
3
SPEAKER_00
And so that s when we started to work with several theory groups
3
SPEAKER_00
on supernova yields, so what comes out of- From the explosion of the supernova?
3
SPEAKER_02
Yeah.
3
SPEAKER_02
That s cool, supernova yields.
3
SPEAKER_02
And so this one was not yielding much iron.
3
SPEAKER_00
Well, we needed to concoct a theoretical supernova that made less.
3
SPEAKER_00
And it s actually surprisingly difficult because you can always add more in the universe, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
But you can t take stuff away.
3
SPEAKER_00
So Japanese colleagues kind of came up with the idea of a fainter supernova that just doesn t have enough oomph, you know, when it explodes.
3
SPEAKER_00
So somehow there s less iron coming out.
3
SPEAKER_00
But at the same time, then these stars showed huge overabundances of carbon, you know, a thousand times more carbon.
3
SPEAKER_00
So how do you now get a thousand times more carbon out of these poor first supernovae, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
That was the theoretical challenge.
3
SPEAKER_00
And because we didn t have just one star, but two.
3
SPEAKER_00
And that really spurred the field to think about what was the nature of the first stars?
3
SPEAKER_00
How did they explode?
3
SPEAKER_00
What are the implications?
3
SPEAKER_00
Because if they are not as luminous and bright and energetic, that has consequences for the
3
SPEAKER_00
for these early proto-galaxies in which, you know, they must have been located in terms of, you know, blowing the gas out, let s say, and disrupting the system.
3
SPEAKER_00
So much higher chance for the earlier system to stay intact for longer, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
So there s a whole tale of consequences.
3
SPEAKER_00
And this is what I mean with, we need to find the story because you do one thing and it s like the dominoes, there are consequences everywhere and suddenly you have a different universe, right?
3
SPEAKER_02
What could possibly be a good explanation for something that yields a lot of carbon and doesn t yield a lot of iron?
3
SPEAKER_00
Well, it s not so much an explanation, more like finding a mechanism for what happens in supernovae and the official term, what was sort of, as I said, cooked up in order to explain the observations.
3
SPEAKER_00
And we have, by the way, found a whole bunch more of these stars, so that holds.
3
SPEAKER_00
And it s called a fallback mechanism.
3
SPEAKER_00
So actually during the supernova explosion, a massive black hole emerges.
3
SPEAKER_00
And so some of the material falls back onto the black hole.
3
SPEAKER_00
So here is a vacuum cleaner now plopped into the middle, right?
3
SPEAKER_02
Like a temporary one that just cleans up some of the elements?
3
SPEAKER_00
Well, sort of, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
Because if you think of the, we haven t talked about this yet, but if you know what a star looks like, a massive star looks like in its interior before it explodes,
3
SPEAKER_00
You have hydrogen and helium still on the outskirts, and then you have layers of heavier and heavier elements all the way up to iron.
3
SPEAKER_00
So you have an iron core in the center, and because you can t get any energy out of iron when you want to fuse to iron atoms anymore, that s when the supernova explodes, or occurs really.
3
SPEAKER_00
It s actually an implosion first and then you have a bounce of the sort of neutron star phase that occurs in the process and then it gets disrupted.
3
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, it s like this giant, you know, basketball.
3
SPEAKER_02
Explosion first, explosion after.
3
SPEAKER_00
And so in the process, if you make your black hole basically big enough, it will suck away some of the iron because that s the closest in terms of the layers.
3
SPEAKER_00
You hold on to it.
3
SPEAKER_00
You don t let it escape.
3
SPEAKER_00
And carbon is much further out.
3
SPEAKER_00
You let it all go.
3
SPEAKER_02
So that explains why you can have a big oomph and not much iron yield.
3
SPEAKER_00
Yes, yes.
3
SPEAKER_02
So is this explained, the He 1327?
3
SPEAKER_02
Correct.
3
SPEAKER_02
And others like it?
3
SPEAKER_00
Yes, so there s, it s well established now that the lower the iron abundance of the stars are, the higher the carbon sort of gets.
3
SPEAKER_00
And carbon is such an interesting element in that regard.
3
SPEAKER_00
If we come back to the formation of the first LOMAS stars, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
So we had the hotter gas, just hydrogen and helium, that made the first stars.
3
SPEAKER_00
There were 100 solar masses or so because the gas couldn t cool enough.
3
SPEAKER_00
So they were big and puffy.
3
SPEAKER_00
Carbon then, coming from the first stars, probably led to enough cooling in these gas clouds that enabled the formation of the first LOMAS stars.
3
SPEAKER_00
So think about what happened if there wouldn t have been any carbon or the properties of the carbon atom would be different.
3
SPEAKER_00
It would not have cooled the gas in such significant ways, perhaps.
3
SPEAKER_00
There wouldn t be any low mass stars.
3
SPEAKER_00
We wouldn t be here today, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
And we re carbon-based, and so I think carbon is really the most important element in the universe for a variety of reasons, because it just enabled this whole evolution that we re now observing and literally seeing in the sky, and it s really fascinating.
3
SPEAKER_02
So combined with the fact that you have the iron deficient, so all of that is probably important to creating humans.
3
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, yeah, we need all the elements, but if you don t have stars, like the sun, small stars that can actually host planets, that have long lifetimes, you need long, long lifetimes if you want to have a stable planet and develop humans.
3
SPEAKER_02
So carbon is kind of important in many ways.
3
SPEAKER_00
Yes, yes.
3
SPEAKER_02
This is perhaps a interesting tangent, if I could just mention that you interviewed Mildred Dresselhaus, Carbon Queen, the remarkable life of the nanoscience pioneer.
3
SPEAKER_02
Is there something you could say about the magic of carbon and the magic of Millie?
3
SPEAKER_00
Well, Millie was certainly magic.
3
SPEAKER_00
She was a professor at MIT for many decades.
3
SPEAKER_00
I met her a number of times.
3
SPEAKER_00
Her photograph, actually a young and an older Millie is still on the wall every time I step out of the elevator.
3
SPEAKER_00
in one of the buildings, I see it.
3
SPEAKER_00
She pioneered all sorts of carbon nanowork, so she was a material scientist, very far removed from what I do on a daily basis.
3
SPEAKER_00
But yes, carbon has amazing properties when you study it, and again, that s indeed another aspect of why carbon is so fascinating.
3
SPEAKER_00
not just in the cosmos, but also for us, you know, making us, creating us in the way that we can use it.
3
SPEAKER_00
It s wonderful.
3
SPEAKER_02
Do you sometimes think about this chemical evolution in this big philosophical way that we re the results of that chemical evolution?
3
SPEAKER_02
Like we re made of this stuff.
3
SPEAKER_02
Like we re made of carbon.
3
SPEAKER_00
Yes, we re made of star stuff.
3
SPEAKER_02
Yeah, and it came.
3
SPEAKER_00
Costigan got it right.
3
SPEAKER_02
I mean, it s almost like a cliche statement, but it s also a materials, a chemical, a physics statement.
3
SPEAKER_02
It came from hydrogen and helium.
3
SPEAKER_02
And then somehow this formation has created this interesting complexity of soup that made us.
3
SPEAKER_02
What are we supposed to make of that?
3
SPEAKER_02
Like what, did we just get really lucky?
3
SPEAKER_02
Why do we get all this cool stuff?
3
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, that s a good question.
3
SPEAKER_02
I don t think it s a question that has an answer.
3
SPEAKER_02
I keep just asking why.
3
SPEAKER_02
But it s just this incredible mystery.
3
SPEAKER_02
So much cool stuff had to happen.
3
SPEAKER_02
So much, sorry, hot stuff had to happen to create us.
3
SPEAKER_00
And so much could have gone wrong and there would have been another outcome, you know.
3
SPEAKER_00
And it s actually amazing how many things kind of fell in place.
3
SPEAKER_00
I mean, maybe that s all sort of self-deterministic in some ways, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
We are who we are because that was the path.
3
SPEAKER_00
Maybe we would have ended up being robots.
3
SPEAKER_00
I don t know.
3
SPEAKER_00
But it s certainly wonderful to
3
SPEAKER_00
you know, a scientist for us to help contribute unraveling our cosmic history, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
I always say the biological evolution on Earth was absolutely facilitated by the chemical evolution of the universe, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
And one doesn t go without the other.
3
SPEAKER_00
From a human perspective.
3
SPEAKER_02
That evolution seems to be creating more and more complexity.
3
SPEAKER_02
The kind of interesting clumping of cool stuff seems to be accelerating and increasing.
3
SPEAKER_02
And it s hard not to see, as humans, that there s some kind of purpose to it, like a momentum towards complexity and beauty, you know?
3
SPEAKER_00
Well, beauty s in the eye of the beholder.
3
SPEAKER_00
But yes, everything gets more complicated.
3
SPEAKER_02
But there s also a beauty to the chemically pristine universe in the early days.
3
SPEAKER_00
Yes, yes, I love the desert with its nothingness.
3
SPEAKER_00
It has so much aesthetics and appeal.
3
SPEAKER_02
We came from nothing, we ll return to nothing.
3
SPEAKER_02
So what about H.E.
3
1523?
3
SPEAKER_02
What s exciting?
3
SPEAKER_02
A red giant star.
3
SPEAKER_02
That s another one of your babies.
3
SPEAKER_00
13.2 billion years old.
3
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, so that one isn t quite as iron deficient as the other one, so probably not a second generation star, but easily third, fourth, fifth or so.
3
SPEAKER_00
We can t really pin it down, but it s also not super important for us.
3
SPEAKER_00
What is important is that that star has a very different chemical composition in a sense that yes, we have all the elements up to iron there,
3
SPEAKER_00
They have sort of normal ratios, which means kind of the same as most other old stars and not too different from the Sun, or at least different in quantifiable ways.
3
SPEAKER_00
But it has this huge overload of very heavy elements.
3
SPEAKER_00
And what was so nice about that stunt in particular was that I could measure the thorium and the uranium abundance.
3
SPEAKER_00
And again, that was the second of its kind, but the uranium abundance could be more well-determined, so we had a better grasp on that.
3
SPEAKER_00
Now, why are thorium and uranium interesting?
3
SPEAKER_00
They are radioactive elements.
3
SPEAKER_00
They decay.
3
SPEAKER_00
Thorium has a half-life of 14 billion years, I believe, and uranium of 4.7.
3
SPEAKER_00
Which, you know, to folks on Earth is a really long time, but those kind of timelines are really good when you want to explore the early universe.
3
SPEAKER_00
So there are two questions now that kind of come to mind.
3
SPEAKER_00
Where do these elements come from and what do they tell us, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
And these, as we know, these heavy elements are made in a specific process.
3
SPEAKER_00
It s a neutron capture process, usually referred to as the R process for rapid neutron capture process.
3
SPEAKER_00
We talked about seed nuclei before, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
So we still don t exactly know where this process can occur.
3
SPEAKER_00
So you have, let s say, a lone iron atom somewhere, and it is in an environment where you have a strong neutron flux.
3
SPEAKER_00
which means there must be lots of neutrons around.
3
SPEAKER_00
And again, when we talk about the site, we can surmise and ponder where that might be the case.
3
SPEAKER_00
But you have this iron atom and you bombard it with neutrons and you do it incredibly fast.
3
SPEAKER_00
Now, what happens in the process?
3
SPEAKER_00
That iron atom, you collect lots of neutrons, it becomes really big and unstable.
3
SPEAKER_00
So it s a heavy neutron-rich nucleus.
3
SPEAKER_00
that wants to decay because it s not stable, it s way too big.
3
SPEAKER_00
And so let s say you add only one neutron to it, that would already make it unstable.
3
SPEAKER_00
So it has a characteristic decay time that s called the beta decay timescale, so it will decay to a stable nucleus.
3
SPEAKER_00
So the neutron will convert to a proton and that makes it stable.
3
SPEAKER_00
If you now bombard lots and lots and lots of neutrons onto that seed nucleus within that timescale of the beta decay, that s how you get to this huge, fat, neutron-rich nucleus that then wants to decay, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
So the rapid processes, you have your seed nuclei, they get bombarded, you create these really heavy neutron-rich nuclei.
3
SPEAKER_00
They re heavier than uranium even.
3
SPEAKER_00
the neutron flux stops, and then all these heavy nuclei, they decay, and they make all these stable isotopes that we know of, all the way up to thorium and uranium.
3
SPEAKER_02
So that rapid nuclei decay is what creates all the fun stuff.
3
SPEAKER_00
Correct, and the whole thing is done within two seconds.
3
SPEAKER_00
So just to add to the rapid here,
3
SPEAKER_00
And literally the snapping on my hand, it s all there.
3
SPEAKER_00
In my talks, I often, I have this nice simulation that illustrates, you know, this creation of these heavy nuclei.
3
SPEAKER_00
And I always say, this is the only simulation you will ever see that s slower than real time.
3
SPEAKER_00
Because in astronomy, you know, we show, oh, this is how a galaxy forms.
3
SPEAKER_00
13 billion years in 30 seconds.
3
SPEAKER_00
Really short, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
This is the opposite.
3
SPEAKER_00
Me showing you this, the elements are long made.
3
SPEAKER_02
So where and when does this happen?
3
SPEAKER_02
Does this process happen?
3
SPEAKER_00
So you need the strong neutron flux.
3
SPEAKER_02
That s the clumping of the neutrons.
3
SPEAKER_00
Yes, that s right.
3
SPEAKER_00
And so there are not that many options, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
So where do you find lots of neutrons in the universe?
3
SPEAKER_00
Well, it s neutron stars, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
Neutron stars form in the making of supernovae.
3
SPEAKER_00
of the explosions.
3
SPEAKER_00
Okay, so maybe some of this heavy material gets sort of made in the making of the supernova explosion and then gets expelled.
3
SPEAKER_00
Or you have neutron stars, so the, you know, if the neutron star, I mean, usually that s the leftover of the supernova.
3
SPEAKER_00
If you have two from a binary pair, so stars usually actually show up in pairs,
3
SPEAKER_00
And so it s not too unusual to create a pair of neutron stars that will still orbit each other after both of their progenitor stars have exploded.
3
SPEAKER_00
And those two neutron stars will orbit each other diligently.
3
SPEAKER_00
But as we know now, thanks to LIGO, the Gravitational Wave Observatory, I mean, we know already that
3
SPEAKER_00
before, but now it s been measured by LIGO, is that these two neutron stars, they will orbit each other for like forever, but in the process they will lose energy.
3
SPEAKER_00
So that orbit is what we call the orbit decays, and eventually the two neutron stars will merge, and that results in an explosive event that has roughly the energy of a supernova.
3
SPEAKER_00
But the process is completely different.
3
SPEAKER_00
And the cool thing is when these two neutron stars collide, they produce a gravitational wave signature because neutron stars are super dense objects.
3
SPEAKER_00
They are like giant atomic nucleuses.
3
SPEAKER_00
So there s a lot of interesting physics happening already.
3
SPEAKER_00
And so if you basically form a super neutron star,
3
SPEAKER_00
by smashing two into each other, more interesting physics happens.
3
SPEAKER_00
And that means that there s this ripple sent out into the space-time continuum, basically.
3
SPEAKER_00
What do people say?
3
SPEAKER_00
The ripples of space-time.
3
SPEAKER_00
It s like
3
SPEAKER_00
It s like you drop a rock into water, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
You see the waves coming.
3
SPEAKER_00
So that s exactly what happens when two neutron stars merge.
3
SPEAKER_00
And this is neutrons galore, right?
3
SPEAKER_00
It s really violent to smash two neutron stars that are so dense already into each other.
3
SPEAKER_00
And in 2017, one of these events occurred.
4
SPEAKER_01
LIGO and VIRGO gravitational wave observatories, they detected that and then the astronomers pointed their telescopes in that direction and they indeed observed what we call the electromagnetic counterpart.
4
SPEAKER_01
So there was something seen in the sky that faded over the course of two weeks.
4
SPEAKER_01
And that light curve, that light, was exactly what you get when you create all these heavy neutron-rich nuclei in the R process, and then the neutron flux stops, and then it takes about two or three weeks for most of them, of these nuclei, to decay to stability.
4
SPEAKER_01
So we saw, the astronomers saw, in this electromagnetic counterpart, the nucleosynthesis of heavy elements occurring.
4
Thank you.
4
SPEAKER_01
And that s just awesome.
4
SPEAKER_00
So awesome.
4
SPEAKER_00
That s electromagnetic counterpart to the gravitational waves that were detected with two neutron stars colliding aggressively, violently to create a super neutron star.
4
SPEAKER_00
And that s where you get all the neutrons and neutron flux somehow and then the whole shebang that happens in two seconds and creates a bunch of.
4
SPEAKER_01
So that confirmed that one of the sites for sure is
4
SPEAKER_01
for the R process to occur is neutron star mergers.
4
SPEAKER_01
Interestingly enough, I have to mention this here, a year prior in 2016, my former grad student Alex G and I, we discovered a small dwarf galaxy
4
SPEAKER_01
that is currently orbiting the Milky Way, it s called Reticulum 2, that was full of ancient iron-deficient stars that also had a strong signature of these heavy elements, exactly like He 1523.
4
SPEAKER_01
We weren t looking for that.
4
SPEAKER_01
I actually wanted to prove that they had really low levels of heavy elements because that s what we had seen in all the other dwarf galaxies.
4
SPEAKER_01
And I was dead set on showing that that is yet the case again, and that that is a typical signature of early star formation.
4
SPEAKER_01
We already talked about low strontium and barium abundances and the oldest stars, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
This is what we had seen anecdotally in the ancient dwarf galaxies that are surrounding us.
4
SPEAKER_00
So that s an ancient dwarf galaxy.
4
SPEAKER_00
That dwarf galaxy has a bunch of ancient stars in it.
4
SPEAKER_01
Yes, yes.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so now we find Reticulum 2 and it has these, the stars show the signature of the rapid neutron capture process, the R process.
4
SPEAKER_01
And we are like, okay, these stars are located in a dwarf galaxy right now.
4
SPEAKER_01
We have environmental information.
4
SPEAKER_01
They are not lost in the galaxy where we don t know where they actually came from.
4
SPEAKER_01
No, we know these stars were formed in that galaxy because they re still in it.
4
SPEAKER_01
And we already deduced from that that it must have been a neutron star merger that went off in Reticulum II at early times that polluted the gas from which all our little stars formed.
4
SPEAKER_00
Can you speak to what a dwarf galaxy is?
4
SPEAKER_00
Can you speak to what this Reticulum II dwarf galaxy is that is orbiting the Milky Way galaxy?
4
SPEAKER_00
It s going to be eaten by it, presumably?
4
SPEAKER_01
It totally is going to be eaten.
4
SPEAKER_01
I can t tell you exactly when.
4
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, the Milky Way remains surrounded by dozens of small dwarf galaxies.
4
SPEAKER_01
They are collections of stars.
4
SPEAKER_01
Some of them, we call them ultra-faint dwarf galaxies because they now only contain, I don t know, a few thousand stars.
4
SPEAKER_01
Very, very faint.
4
SPEAKER_00
Is it still detectable?
4
SPEAKER_01
Yes, because they re fairly close and we detect actual individual stars in them.
4
SPEAKER_01
So I ve observed some of the faintest stars, you know, you possibly observe with current telescopes in these dwarf galaxies because I was like, I need to know what the chemical composition is because there are leftovers from the early universe, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
they did not get eaten.
4
SPEAKER_01
So they re still in their native surroundings.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s like getting the lions in the wild, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
I gotta study those and compare to the counterparts that got eaten and are now in the Milky Way.
4
SPEAKER_00
And so I- So presumably most of those stars, it s not all of those stars in that dwarf galaxy are really ancient.
4
SPEAKER_01
They re all really ancient because actually, as it turns out, if you have a small galaxy, there was a process early on in the universe called reionization that kind of heated up everything.
4
SPEAKER_01
And together with some supernova explosions in an early shallow, you know, bound system,
4
SPEAKER_01
All these little systems lost their gas, it was sort of blown out or it simply evaporated or both, probably both.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so these systems have been unable to continue to form stars since.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s the best for us stellar archaeologists that you could hope for because it s a whole bunch of stars still sitting there.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s not just one, it s a whole bunch of them still sitting there ever since and literally nothing has happened to them.
4
SPEAKER_01
They ve just been waiting there for us.
4
SPEAKER_00
So from the stellar archeology perspective, what is juicier and more interesting, the old stars in the outskirts that have been eaten, or the outskirts from Milky Way, or the stars in the dwarf galaxies?
4
SPEAKER_00
What s of all the things you love about the world?
4
SPEAKER_00
You said you love stars, so which do you love more?
4
SPEAKER_01
That s a hard one.
4
SPEAKER_01
I mean, I love them all, of course.
4
SPEAKER_01
They serve different purposes.
4
SPEAKER_01
The stars in the Milky Way, I can get much, much, much better data for them because they re brighter, they re closer, so they re brighter.
4
SPEAKER_01
And that tickles my fancy.
4
SPEAKER_00
And they have interesting kinematics, presumably.
4
SPEAKER_01
Yes, and we can get that.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so HG 1523, for example, that one is really bright, only it s a red giant, so it s intrinsically bright and it s fairly close.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so the data I got for that was insanely good and that yielded this uranium detection and thorium detection.
4
SPEAKER_01
I can never get that kind of data for a dwarf galaxy star.
4
SPEAKER_01
So that s a big trade-off.
4
SPEAKER_01
But the environmental information that we get along with the basic information about these stars in each dwarf galaxy is really, really valuable in establishing, you know, these, for example, these site information, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
Because the galaxy is still there, so nothing crazy could have happened.
4
SPEAKER_01
So to close that loop,
4
SPEAKER_01
Probably some heavy elements come out of supernovae here and there, but somehow my theory colleagues tell me that a normal supernova just doesn t have enough oomph to really get an R-process going and doing it all.
4
SPEAKER_00
So you need these orbiting supernovae.
4
SPEAKER_01
We need probably the neutron star mergers or we need a special kind of supernova that s maybe extremely massive or heavily rotating or does something else funny, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
To really kind of get that particular process going.
4
SPEAKER_01
But the normal supernovae don t do it, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
So only a little bit comes out.
4
SPEAKER_01
But you could come along and say, Anna, why don t you just...
4
SPEAKER_01
take 100 supernovae together to build up the yield, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
But then I come along and say, look, this dwarf galaxy is still intact today.
4
SPEAKER_01
If you would have plugged in 100 supernovae into this little system early on, it would have blown apart.
4
SPEAKER_01
It would have blown apart past 5 supernovae or 10.
4
SPEAKER_01
So that s a really important constraint that we have, that these systems are still alive, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
So it helps us to pin down where certain processes could have possibly happened.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so it s just a different type of information that we get.
4
SPEAKER_00
It d be amazing if we could talk about the observational aspect of this, the tools of observation.
4
SPEAKER_00
So what telescopes have you used, do you use, and what does the data look like?
4
SPEAKER_00
And I think I ve read a few interesting stories about the actual process of day-to-day observation, a bunch of probably late nights.
4
SPEAKER_01
Well yeah, astronomers are doing it all night long, so we have lots of late nights.
4
SPEAKER_00
Can you explain the all night long aspect of it?
4
SPEAKER_01
Well, let me start by saying I mostly these days use the Magellan telescopes in Chile.
4
SPEAKER_01
They are 6.5 meter telescope, which means the mirror diameter is 6.5 meter.
4
SPEAKER_01
That s not the largest that is out there, but it s among the largest.
4
SPEAKER_01
And I use a spectrograph because I m a spectroscopist.
4
SPEAKER_01
I don t take pictures.
4
SPEAKER_01
And that particular spectrograph at that telescope is actually
4
SPEAKER_01
unusually efficient, so it kind of makes up for the fact that the mirror isn t as large in, let s say, the eight meter telescopes from the Europeans or so.
4
SPEAKER_01
So I m very happy with that.
4
SPEAKER_00
Efficiency meaning?
4
SPEAKER_01
How many photons get collected sort of per time unit, because that s always the limiting factor.
4
SPEAKER_01
Prior to the pandemic, we would travel to Chile to do our observations.
4
SPEAKER_01
Those telescopes are the last observatory where people were sort of supposed to travel there and take their own observations.
4
SPEAKER_01
Most other observatories basically have staff there by now who take the observations for you.
4
SPEAKER_00
So there s the directly, the scientists are specifying where to point the telescope and sitting there and collecting the data, make sure the data s collected well, the cleaning of the data, the offloading of the data, all that kind of stuff.
4
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, so it s mostly done for them.
4
SPEAKER_01
Obviously that s super convenient, but it also takes,
4
SPEAKER_01
takes away a central part of what the work of an astronomer is, which is data collection, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
We don t have an experiment in the basement where we can go day and night or whenever we please and ask a certain question of the apparatus, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
Let s
4
SPEAKER_01
turn this knob and see what happens.
4
SPEAKER_01
Let s turn that knob and see what happens.
4
SPEAKER_01
No, you know, we only have one experiment, which is the universe.
4
SPEAKER_01
And what we see is what we get.
4
SPEAKER_01
And I think it s so important to take an active role in that.
4
SPEAKER_01
So I really loved going to the observatory.
4
SPEAKER_01
I ve taken many students there over the years,
4
SPEAKER_01
to teach them and to just show them what it means to be an astronomer because you go to these remote mountaintops and it s such a magical environment and you wait there for the sun to go down and then you get ready and you look outside and it s such a serene environment.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s a little bit out of this world.
4
SPEAKER_00
You re sitting there, so the sun goes down, it s evening, late evening, and what does it look like?
4
SPEAKER_00
What are some of the most magical experiences of that process?
4
SPEAKER_01
Well, you know, when you re on top of a mountain, you know, climbers, I guess, get to see that probably otherwise.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s very calm and the colors are so beautiful and I always become much calmer when I m there.
4
SPEAKER_01
I m just A, because I m just there for one purpose only and that s data collection.
4
SPEAKER_01
I can say no to my emails, I can say no to everything else because I m observing.
4
SPEAKER_01
So there s literally less distractions because you re just there to do one thing.
4
SPEAKER_00
And also the emails somehow seem less significant.
4
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, yeah.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s just you can t afford to focus on this one thing.
4
SPEAKER_01
And it just kind of does something to you.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s a little hard to describe, but if you then fast forward, maybe I can speak a little bit about that.
4
SPEAKER_01
I have done a lot of astrophotography there as well, and observing faint dwarf galaxy stars, these are like 45 minutes, 55 minute exposures, so you actually have a lot of time.
4
SPEAKER_01
So I would run outside and just lay on the ground under the Southern Milky Way,
4
SPEAKER_01
beautiful right up, you know, there.
4
SPEAKER_01
And I would just lay there like the snow angel, you know, and just stare up there and just kind of let my thoughts sort of pass through my brain and just like, I m one of it, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
We talked about this in the beginning.
4
SPEAKER_01
This is when I personally have the feeling that I m a part of it, I belong here, rather than feeling kind of small.
4
SPEAKER_01
Yes, I m small, but there are many other small things, and lots of small things make one big whole, right?
4
SPEAKER_00
And we re part of that big whole.
4
SPEAKER_00
So that s looking at the inner spirals of the Milky Way galaxy.
4
SPEAKER_01
And just, you know, this dark sky with the bright stars, and I have described this in my book years ago,
4
SPEAKER_01
If the Milky Way is all bright above you, you don t need a moon or anything.
4
SPEAKER_01
You can walk in the starlight and you will find your way.
4
SPEAKER_01
There are no trees there for safety reasons, but you wouldn t even run into a tree, right?
4
SPEAKER_01
I mean, you can almost see the shadow from the starlight because it s such a dark sight and the stars are so bright.
4
SPEAKER_01
These are kind of moments that kind of change you a little bit.
4
SPEAKER_00
And you see the unity of it all.
4
SPEAKER_01
Yeah.
4
SPEAKER_01
And it s just you and nature and, you know, with modern civilization and all of that, we, I think we often try a little bit too hard to be removed from, from nature, you know, to, to be independent of it and figuring it all out.
4
SPEAKER_01
But at the end of the day, we re, we re just a part of it.
4
SPEAKER_01
And, and that really helps me to remember that, that, you know, we re one in the same.
4
SPEAKER_00
Well, that fills me with hope that, I tend to think of us humans as in the very early days of whatever the heck we are.
4
SPEAKER_00
So that makes me think thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of years from now, that we ll be reaching, whatever we become, we ll be traveling out there to explore more and more and more.
4
SPEAKER_00
So what you re doing is the early days of exploration with the tools we have.
4
SPEAKER_01
Yes, the early seafarers looking at the sky for navigation.
4
SPEAKER_00
coming up with different theories of what s on the other side, that the earth, starting to gain an intuition that the earth may be round, and that we might be able to navigate all the way around to get to the financial benefits of getting spices from India, whatever the reason, whatever the grant funding process is all about, but ultimately actually results in a deep understanding of the mystery that s all around us.
4
SPEAKER_00
And I mean, it s just to travel out there,
4
SPEAKER_00
I mean, to me, the discovery of life in the solar system, I really hope to see that in my lifetime.
4
SPEAKER_00
Some kind of life, bacteria, something, maybe dead.
4
SPEAKER_00
Because that means there s life everywhere.
4
SPEAKER_00
And that s just the kind of stuff that might be out there.
4
SPEAKER_00
All the different environmental conditions, chemically speaking, that are out there.
4
SPEAKER_00
And it just seems like when you look at Earth, life finds a way to survive, to thrive in whatever conditions.
4
SPEAKER_00
And so maybe that process just kind of humbles you and it s super exciting to know that there is life out there of different forms.
4
SPEAKER_00
And of course that raises the question of what is life even?
4
SPEAKER_00
We tend to have a very human-centric perspective of what is a living organism and what is intelligence and all this kinds of stuff.
4
SPEAKER_00
And all the work in artificial intelligence now is starting to challenge our ideas of what makes human beings special.
4
SPEAKER_00
And I think we re doing that through all kinds of ways, and I think you re working some part doing that as well.
4
SPEAKER_00
Like the unity you feel is realizing we re part of this big mechanism of nature, whatever that is, that s creating all kinds of cool stuff from the humble, pristine origins to today.
4
SPEAKER_00
So what is, if you could just kind of linger on the process of the data, what does the data look like?
4
SPEAKER_00
And how does the raw data lead to a discovery of an ancient star?
4
SPEAKER_01
Well, as a spectroscopist, we have to, I guess, talk for a brief moment about what a spectrum is.
4
SPEAKER_01
everyone, I hope, has seen a rainbow in the sky.
4
SPEAKER_01
That is basically what we re doing.
4
SPEAKER_01
We don t send the starlight through a raindrop that then gets bounced around and splits up the light into the rainbow colors.
4
SPEAKER_01
We do it with a spectrograph, so basically a prism.
4
SPEAKER_01
So we send the styli through a prism of sorts and that splits it up and then we record exactly that.
4
SPEAKER_01
So it s a little 2D picture actually of a spectrum.
4
SPEAKER_01
Now it s not going to look colorful.
5
SPEAKER_00
both, just black and white.
5
SPEAKER_00
Different colors have, of course, different energies.
5
SPEAKER_00
That s what we record.
5
SPEAKER_00
More specifically, we record it as wavelengths, so wavelengths and frequency and energies all the same at the end of the day.
5
SPEAKER_00
We process that little image in a sense that we do a cross cut and then sum up a few columns so that we get all the data that we recorded.
5
SPEAKER_00
And what we see is a, it s a bit funny to describe just with words, but a wiggly line with lots of dips.
5
SPEAKER_00
So the 2D processed spectrum, we call it continuum.
5
SPEAKER_00
So it s just a flat line basically, and then there are dips.
5
SPEAKER_00
So the interesting things are the dips.
5
SPEAKER_00
If you think back of the rainbow, what we actually see in our stars is not just a rainbow, but it would be a rainbow with lots of black lines in it, which means certain little pieces of color have been eaten away by a certain amount.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so we can no longer see it as well or not at all.
5
SPEAKER_00
Why is that happening?
5
SPEAKER_00
So if we come back to our stars, what we re observing, we re observing the stellar surface.
5
SPEAKER_00
We can actually never peer with our telescopes inside, we only ever can go after the surface.
5
SPEAKER_00
And the surface layer contains different kinds of elements.
5
SPEAKER_00
every one of those types of atoms, so elements are just different types of atoms, they absorb different photons that are coming from the hot core where the fusion is occurring.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so that means that if you were the observer, you know, with a spectrograph or without, you will see the starlight, but certain frequencies, certain energies of that light will have been absorbed by all the different atoms in the gas.
5
SPEAKER_00
So, you see less of them.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so, those are the dips.
5
SPEAKER_00
And the strength of the dips tell us which element was it and how much of that element was or is in the star.
5
SPEAKER_00
So, we have many, many, many dips.
5
SPEAKER_00
The solar spectrum, for reference, all the dips are overlapping because the abundance of all the elements is so high.
5
SPEAKER_00
It s actually a very complicated spectrum.
5
SPEAKER_00
My spectra really look like a straight line and then there s a dip here and then a straight line again, there s a dip there.
5
SPEAKER_00
The Sun doesn t have straight lines.
5
SPEAKER_00
I mean, it s just all absorbed in some form or another.
5
SPEAKER_00
But the old stars have so little of all the elements.
5
SPEAKER_00
that there are only occasionally these dips that then indicate, okay, that one at that wavelength was iron, and here we have carbon, and there s magnesium and sodium, and oh, there s a little strontium line here.
5
SPEAKER_00
So we have a much easier way to map out this barcode that the spectrum pretty much is at the end of the day.
5
SPEAKER_00
and to then measure the strength of these, we call it absorption lines, to then calculate with existing codes that mimic the physics of the stellar atmospheres, like how much was absorbed, what kind of elements were present in the stellar atmosphere.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so this is how we get to our abundance measurements and then all together that gives us the chemical composition and that particular signature in that star.
5
SPEAKER_01
If you, do you ever look at like the raw spectrograph and the absorption line and are able to see into it some interesting non-standard outlier kind of patterns?
5
SPEAKER_01
Or does this have to do heavy amount of processing?
5
SPEAKER_00
We actually process, it s fairly straightforward to do our processing.
5
SPEAKER_00
We do it at the telescope, so I often take a shorter exposure first, let s say 10 or 15 minutes.
5
SPEAKER_00
So mostly when I do discovery work, we just take a quick look, spectrum, then we process it while we observe the next star.
5
SPEAKER_00
Then we take a quick look, we have what I call the summary plot, it s a collection of little areas in the spectrum that have the key positions, the positions of the key elements in it, and it s kind of like reading the tea leaves.
5
SPEAKER_00
I have stared at so many spectra, I just need to know, I just need to see our summary plot and I can tell you exactly what the numbers are going to be.
5
SPEAKER_01
And also to tell if it s going to be promising to look at further.
5
SPEAKER_00
Yes, exactly.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so that s it.
5
SPEAKER_00
Thumbs up, thumbs down.
5
SPEAKER_00
Are you worth my time or not?
5
SPEAKER_00
In most cases it s not, or it s good enough.
5
SPEAKER_00
We can do a basic analysis, maybe publish this as part of a larger sample just so we output that we have observed the star and their basic nature.
5
SPEAKER_00
That s an important part to publish as well.
5
SPEAKER_00
And yeah, I had a run.
5
SPEAKER_00
So now we do remote observing.
5
SPEAKER_00
I do all of this now from my home, from my living room, all night long.
5
SPEAKER_00
And I often work with colleagues.
5
SPEAKER_00
So we do it over Zoom and we process the data.
5
SPEAKER_00
We look at it, same thing still.
5
SPEAKER_00
And we just found a star that had a very low iron abundance.
5
SPEAKER_00
And then we decided, okay, that looks interesting.
5
SPEAKER_00
We re just going to keep exposing.
5
SPEAKER_00
So we took more data on it on the spot and we re writing up the paper right now.
5
SPEAKER_01
How do you know where to point the telescope?
5
SPEAKER_00
It s not random.
5
SPEAKER_00
There s a lot of work that goes into that.
5
SPEAKER_00
I began my career by
5
SPEAKER_00
answering, trying to answer that question, as in like doing the search process.
5
SPEAKER_00
That s why I called my book that I ve written some time ago, Searching for the Oldest Stars, because searching is one thing, it s very time consuming, and then on top of that, not everyone finds, right?
5
SPEAKER_00
And I often don t find, but I keep searching.
5
SPEAKER_00
Because, you know, techniques have established that, yes, we can do it if we re just patient enough and keep going, because it s a numbers game.
5
SPEAKER_00
And that s often the case in science.
5
SPEAKER_00
And that s something that not enough is talked about, how tedious it is and how long it takes to get to that one discovery, right, that moves the field further.
5
SPEAKER_01
And how difficult it is to believe that there is a thing to be discovered.
5
SPEAKER_00
Yes, yes.
5
SPEAKER_00
We have the saying, I learned this I think from my supervisor, one star is a discovery,
5
SPEAKER_00
Two is a sample, and three is a population.
5
SPEAKER_00
So as soon as you found three of roughly the same kind, you re done.
5
SPEAKER_00
But you need to get there.
5
SPEAKER_01
Yeah.
5
SPEAKER_01
Probably the first is the hardest, right?
5
SPEAKER_00
Yes.
5
SPEAKER_00
But it kind of remains really hard.
5
SPEAKER_00
But the thing is that at past three, many of us are like, okay, we solved that problem.
5
SPEAKER_00
We ve done it three times.
5
SPEAKER_00
We can do it.
5
SPEAKER_00
That s a thing, right?
5
SPEAKER_00
That s a population.
5
SPEAKER_00
Three iron deficient stars, let s say, right?
5
SPEAKER_00
That s one puzzle piece.
5
SPEAKER_00
Now we can move on to the next thing.
5
SPEAKER_01
That s an indicator that there s many more of them potentially.
5
SPEAKER_00
Yes, yes, yes.
5
SPEAKER_00
So to cut a long story short about the searching, we started early on with what s called low resolution spectroscopy of many stars.
5
SPEAKER_00
So for example, my thesis work almost 20 years ago was
5
SPEAKER_00
piggybacking off a quasar survey that had collected quasars, basically giant supermassive black holes that are really far away, so you only see one big bright light point, so it looks like a star, but it s actually just a giant supermassive black hole that outshines its own galaxy.
5
SPEAKER_00
And people had been trying to study those and they had taken little spectra of all things in the sky and it turns out, oh, you can fish out the actual stars from that and look for certain signatures that might indicate low metallicity stars, so stars with low abundances.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so it was painstaking work to then take medium-resolution spectroscopy to get a little bit more information and to use approximations and to kind of get candidates that we can then eventually take to the big glass like Magellan to get a high-resolution spectrum.
5
SPEAKER_00
So we really see the dips of all the individual elements.
5
SPEAKER_00
that then give us the final answer, is it yay or nay?
5
SPEAKER_00
These days, with another grad student, I developed a new technique to use images actually of all the stars in the sky taken with very narrow filters.
5
SPEAKER_00
So it s like you re wearing very specific glasses that only let so much light through.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so we can do similar things through having several narrow band filters, what we call it.
5
SPEAKER_00
to fish out things that have no absorption over here, so just the straight line, and then a little dip here, so a little something there.
5
SPEAKER_00
And that has proven fairly successful in recent years.
5
SPEAKER_01
So looking at the entire, looking at broader regions of space.
5
SPEAKER_00
That s right, because these stars are a little bit like the needle in the haystack, right?
5
SPEAKER_00
There are not that many left over and certainly the galaxy has made plenty of stars in between.
5
SPEAKER_00
We need to comb through all of those to get to the goods.
5
SPEAKER_00
So we always start with millions and then work our way down and in the end we have like three good candidates.
5
SPEAKER_01
I wonder how those ancient stars feel that they were noticed.
5
SPEAKER_01
They probably know that nobody pays attention.
5
SPEAKER_01
No, I m just kidding.
5
SPEAKER_00
We re all special, right?
5
SPEAKER_00
So are the stars.
5
SPEAKER_01
It s good, it s inspiring, even if you re the outcast.
5
SPEAKER_01
In your pristine nature, you still might nevertheless be noticed.
5
SPEAKER_01
I m hoping the same about humans, if somebody s observing us.
5
SPEAKER_01
Is there something else you could say that s about the challenges of this kind of high precision measurement that you re doing?
5
SPEAKER_01
So this kind of collection of data looking, trying to pull out the signal from the noise out there.
5
SPEAKER_00
Well, that s literally what we re doing in multiple ways actually.
5
SPEAKER_00
We re trying to find the needle in the haystack and then we find something and then it turns out it s just a little bit too faint to actually get the kind of data quality on it that we would like or that would be warranted given the potential of the star, right?
5
SPEAKER_01
So there s always noise, there s always a little bit of noise and you have to try to say like, what, yeah, how special is this when you re looking at the absorption line?
5
SPEAKER_01
How?
5
SPEAKER_00
So the most iron-poor stars, their iron lines are so tiny that they re literally, you know, almost in the noise.
5
SPEAKER_00
So you need incredibly good data to make detections.
5
SPEAKER_00
And the funny thing is, we re looking for the nothingness of, let s say, the iron lines, but then we don t want nothing because if there s nothing in the spectrum, we can t measure anything.
5
SPEAKER_00
We can only get an upper limit.
5
SPEAKER_00
But we d really like a measurement.
5
SPEAKER_00
So we are looking for the last little bit that you could possibly detect.
5
SPEAKER_00
And that s a strong function of the brightness of the star because the telescopes have the size that they do.
5
SPEAKER_00
That s not going to change for a while.
5
SPEAKER_00
Hopefully, eventually it will, but it s going to be at least 10 years out.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so, yes, we re often literally stuck in the noise because we can t make the measurements.
5
SPEAKER_00
So actually, the record holder for the most iron-poor star only has an upper limit.
5
SPEAKER_00
We can t get enough data on this to actually pinpoint a measurement.
5
SPEAKER_00
to then take it to our theory colleagues and say like, give me this little iron out of your first star.
5
SPEAKER_00
So it s a bit frustrating, but also super exciting at the same time.
5
SPEAKER_01
So let s go to both side of that spectrum.
5
SPEAKER_01
What s like the most exciting discovery to you personally?
5
SPEAKER_01
Is there a moment you remember that you saw a piece of data and your heart skipped a bit?
5
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, yeah, of course.
5
SPEAKER_01
Is it HE 1327?
5
SPEAKER_00
That was definitely one of those moments.
5
SPEAKER_00
I wasn t actually present at the telescope, but we were sent the data immediately from our colleague and we just looked at it and our eyes got really wide and it was like, oh my god, this is this really what you think it is?
5
SPEAKER_00
So we had to run some numbers and it was and these are magical little moments.
5
SPEAKER_00
The thing is,
5
SPEAKER_00
You know, often we have false positives.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so there s always this kind of period.
5
SPEAKER_00
And often it s, I don t know, 10, 15 minutes where you need to make some tests to kind of make a decision.
5
SPEAKER_00
Is this really something I should keep observing now?
5
SPEAKER_00
Is this really as good as I think?
5
SPEAKER_00
Or am I being fooled by something, right?
5
SPEAKER_00
So actually, if you take a spectrum of a white dwarf, a white dwarf is the leftover core of a star like the sun that has gone extinct.
5
SPEAKER_00
And white dwarfs have lost all their outer atmosphere, so it s just the hydrogen helium core, so they look like a metal pore star because that s only hydrogen helium left, right?
5
SPEAKER_00
But the hydrogen lines that you can see in the spectrum of our stars and of the white dwarfs are a little bit wider than normal.
5
SPEAKER_00
So you need to have a good eye.
5
SPEAKER_00
just to check, you know, does this look a little bit wider than us?
5
SPEAKER_00
Is this a white dwarf who s fooling me here, right?
5
SPEAKER_00
And so it s like, this moment, it s like, oh my God.
5
SPEAKER_01
It s just minutes of nervousness.
5
SPEAKER_00
Yes, yes.
5
SPEAKER_00
And sometimes, you know, it s a dud, and sometimes it s not.
5
SPEAKER_01
What s been a big, that you remember, heartbreak?
5
SPEAKER_01
Like a painful low point?
5
SPEAKER_01
Is it all leading up to the first, is it all about H.E.
5
SPEAKER_01
1327 again?
5
SPEAKER_01
Just the leading up to it, or has there been like a,
5
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, has there been like low points in the search?
5
SPEAKER_00
That s a good question.
5
SPEAKER_00
I mean, you know, it starts with mundane things as in like, you won your telescope time, you travel there, and the weather is completely cloudy, it rains, and you had three nights, which is a lot, and you go home empty handed.
5
SPEAKER_00
So that s definitely a low point.
5
SPEAKER_00
Probably not what you were thinking of, but there is a certain occupational hazard to
5
SPEAKER_01
which requires a kind of resilience and a patience.
5
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, and you just gotta learn to live with it.
5
SPEAKER_00
Coming back to Reticulum 2, actually, you know, that little dwarf galaxy, that was a run that we had, and the weather was incredibly bad, and I had sent my student there.
5
SPEAKER_00
And I was at home, and he calls me at 2 a.m., and he was like, Anna, I think I observed the wrong star.
5
SPEAKER_00
I m so sorry.
5
SPEAKER_00
There is this line there, this Europium line, and it looks like a metal-rich star.
5
SPEAKER_00
And I was like, it s cool.
5
SPEAKER_00
We all make mistakes.
5
SPEAKER_00
Send me the data.
5
SPEAKER_00
Send me that summary plot.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so I look at it.
5
SPEAKER_00
I was super tired.
5
SPEAKER_00
I can t really tell.
5
SPEAKER_00
It doesn t look wrong, but I can t tell you right now that it s right either.
5
SPEAKER_00
So why don t you go to the next target? 
5
SPEAKER_00
And he calls me back an hour later, you know, it looks just the same.
5
SPEAKER_00
What am I supposed to do?
5
SPEAKER_00
And then I joked, well, maybe we found an R-process galaxy.
5
SPEAKER_00
Let s go to the next one.
5
SPEAKER_00
And the weather was degrading.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so to cut a long story short,
5
SPEAKER_00
We had to come, so he was observing the right stars.
5
SPEAKER_00
It was in our process galaxy, the first one we had ever discovered, totally unpredicted.
5
SPEAKER_00
We had no idea that this was a thing.
5
SPEAKER_00
Of course, we thought that such a thing might possibly exist, because why not, right?
5
SPEAKER_00
Neutron star mergers happen somewhere, crazy supernovae probably too, but we were not prepared in that moment to find this thing.
5
SPEAKER_00
And in the end, the weather was getting worse and worse, and we wanted to see how many R-processed stars are in this galaxy.
5
SPEAKER_00
by a hairline to observe the nine brightest stars, but the data quality was atrocious.
5
SPEAKER_01
And the weather affects the data quality.
5
SPEAKER_00
Yes, absolutely, because these were really faint stars.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so we were really lucky by making a very
5
SPEAKER_00
tight strategy of getting the absolute bare minimum for all the stores so we could at least take a very crude look.
5
SPEAKER_00
Is it a yay or a nay?
5
SPEAKER_00
We couldn t even say yes or no, just to get an idea because we needed to know.
6
SPEAKER_02
Why was that important?
6
SPEAKER_02
Because we could only observe this system again nine months later.
6
SPEAKER_01
So there s always a window of observation.
6
SPEAKER_02
Yes, it was setting, this was our chance, and it was going away with the clouds, you know?
6
SPEAKER_01
That was super high stakes.
6
SPEAKER_02
But we just made it, really, it was...
6
SPEAKER_02
Almost impossible, and it was just, the thing is, this is such a serendipitous moment in a serendipitous moment.
6
SPEAKER_02
The enhancement of these heavy elements was so strong that even in this really crappy data, we could still see the enhancement.
6
SPEAKER_02
The absorption was so strong that it stuck out of the noise.
6
SPEAKER_02
If that enhancement wouldn t have been as strong, we would not have been able to say anything because we wouldn t have been able to tell.
6
SPEAKER_02
But because it was so extreme, it lent us a hand, despite the weather and all, to say like, yes, this is it.
6
SPEAKER_02
So that was quite the night.
6
SPEAKER_01
Luck, I mean a lot of this is just luck.
6
SPEAKER_01
So that was the first our process galaxy discovered.
6
SPEAKER_02
Yes, I didn t sleep all that much then.
6
SPEAKER_01
Do you have hope, are you excited about James Webb Space Telescope and other telescopes in the future that increase the resolution and the precision of what can be detected out there?
6
SPEAKER_02
Absolutely.
6
SPEAKER_02
Data with T is fantastic already.
6
SPEAKER_02
I am not planning to use it personally, although I think I m on one or two observing proposals actually, because similar to what we already spoke about, we re interested in the same thing.
6
SPEAKER_02
We re just kind of looking at different sides of the fence.
6
SPEAKER_02
I have my old surviving stars and I concoct these little stories about what the earliest galaxies may have looked like, what the objects were that contributed energy and elements and all these things.
6
SPEAKER_02
And my JWT colleagues, they try to detect some of these earliest photons from these earliest systems to look at the energetics and other things.
6
SPEAKER_02
What was there, how many, these kinds of things.
6
SPEAKER_02
Together we re trying to explore this first billion years, but we do it in very complementary ways.
6
SPEAKER_02
And so I m very excited to see what they can come up with and how that helps me to inform my stories better and more comprehensively.
6
SPEAKER_01
What do you think is the future of the field of stellar archeology?
6
SPEAKER_01
How much can we, maybe what are the limits of our understanding of this first billion years of our universe?
6
SPEAKER_02
Well, obviously lots of limitations in the sense that I always say, I have a metal pour star for any of your questions.
6
SPEAKER_02
Because there are so many different kinds out there.
6
SPEAKER_02
And we still find new patterns sometimes, right?
6
SPEAKER_02
And there needs to be an explanation.
6
SPEAKER_02
The question is, is it ultimately just one quirky star?
6
SPEAKER_02
Is it two or is it three, right?
6
SPEAKER_02
Is it a sample?
6
SPEAKER_02
Is it a population?
6
SPEAKER_02
So we haven t concluded that kind of work yet.
6
SPEAKER_01
So every metal pore star is a kind of data point that you can use to improve the quality of your model of how the evolution of the early universe.
6
SPEAKER_02
Yes, yes, and I would say we ve made huge progress over the last 20 years.
6
SPEAKER_02
When I joined that field, it was in its infancy, and there was this serendipitous discovery of that first, second generation star.
6
SPEAKER_02
And we have filled in the canvas a great deal since then.
6
SPEAKER_02
And this is what I have greatly enjoyed about doing so, because there was so much discovery potential.
6
SPEAKER_02
And it s been dying down a little bit because of all the progress.
6
SPEAKER_02
It s on the up and coming again because there are so many large spectroscopic surveys in the works now that will just provide a different level of data that we haven t had before.
6
SPEAKER_02
I m sort of of this older generation.
6
SPEAKER_02
I have only very few colleagues, I work in small teams, and I observe every single star myself.
6
SPEAKER_02
that whatever I can, I do myself.
6
SPEAKER_02
I don t generally take other people s data, at least certainly not in the end stage, and I m not a big data kind of person, although we re all headed that way.
6
SPEAKER_02
I certainly use data from the Gaia astrometric satellite for the kinematics, for example.
6
SPEAKER_02
But that s personally a new thing for me to use sort of big sky surveys that are available.
6
SPEAKER_02
So it s still very sort of hand-grown field, where we do our individual observations.
6
SPEAKER_02
I have enjoyed that a lot, but that s about to change.
6
SPEAKER_01
So one star at a time?
6
SPEAKER_01
Yes.
6
SPEAKER_01
I mean, there s power to that, to build up intuition of the early universe by looking one star at a time.
6
SPEAKER_02
Yeah, and this is how you can really drill down on the questions that you have, right?
6
SPEAKER_02
Because you control what data you get.
6
SPEAKER_02
Otherwise, you have the data that you have, right?
6
SPEAKER_02
You get what you get and you don t get upset.
6
SPEAKER_02
I don t like that.
6
SPEAKER_02
I m a little bit snobby.
6
SPEAKER_02
I really like to formulate my questions, go to the telescope, and then come what may, I will try to get it.
6
SPEAKER_01
And also develop the intuition of where the data can be relied upon and where it can t and all the different quirks of the data and all that kind of stuff.
6
SPEAKER_01
Sometimes a lot is lost in the aggregation of the noisy data.
6
SPEAKER_02
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
6
SPEAKER_02
And there s always the danger if you have someone else s data that you just don t really understand the, you know, the limitations, completeness things, how certain things were set up and, you know, you get out what you put in.
6
SPEAKER_02
So I m really particular about that and it certainly paid off for me.
6
SPEAKER_02
That s one of the main notions that I try to teach in my classes and to my students that
6
SPEAKER_02
You need to be able to formulate your question really well because otherwise you re going to get an answer to a different question, but you won t notice that the goalpost has shifted in the meantime, right?
6
SPEAKER_02
So your interpretation can only be as good as the question.
6
SPEAKER_02
If you need to change your question, that s cool.
6
SPEAKER_02
Do it.
6
SPEAKER_02
But then, you know, it needs to pair up with your interpretation again.
6
SPEAKER_02
And so knowing, really being in the know about every step of what happens, that leads to quality results, I think.
6
SPEAKER_02
That s why I have sometimes a little trouble with sort of big data and statistical analysis.
6
SPEAKER_02
Yes, on average, that s true.
6
SPEAKER_02
I m not debating that.
6
SPEAKER_02
But I m the kind of person, I like to look at the outliers, so not the bulk, but, you know, the special ones.
6
SPEAKER_02
and they just need to be treated in a different way, and there needs to be an acknowledgement of that, different ways for different things.
6
SPEAKER_01
So big data can look at divorce rates, and perhaps you and I are more interested in the individual love stories.
6
SPEAKER_02
Yes.
6
SPEAKER_02
That works for me.
6
SPEAKER_01
So I don t know if it s possible to say, but what do you think is the big discoveries that are waiting?
6
SPEAKER_01
Is it on the different dynamics of the yield?
6
SPEAKER_01
The common narrative, the common story of how some of these metal poor stars are formed?
6
SPEAKER_01
Where are the discoveries in this field that you think will come?
6
SPEAKER_02
I think the individual discoveries are actually, we ve made most of those, certainly through individual stars.
6
SPEAKER_02
Finding yet another second generation star is incredibly important for me.
6
SPEAKER_02
isn t really going to move the needle.
6
SPEAKER_02
Finding 50 of them or 100 of them, that would move the needle, but that s in order or two magnitudes up.
6
SPEAKER_02
And new search techniques and new surveys may enable that, but would you still call that a discovery?
6
SPEAKER_02
Right?
6
SPEAKER_01
So that s just a scale, that s a scale.
6
SPEAKER_02
Yes, so I think about it more like literally of the puzzle.
6
SPEAKER_02
Let s say you have a thousand-piece puzzle and you have 900 pieces in there.
6
SPEAKER_02
If you re a person like me, I want to get to the last ones.
6
SPEAKER_02
I m not going to leave it just like, okay, I see broadly what this is going to look like, right?
6
SPEAKER_02
I m done now.
6
SPEAKER_02
No, I want to get to the last one.
6
SPEAKER_02
Is the picture globally going to change?
6
SPEAKER_02
No.
6
SPEAKER_02
Are we going to figure out all the details on how it really works?
6
SPEAKER_02
Yes, right?
6
SPEAKER_01
So really careful, detailed map out the ancient stars of our universe.
6
SPEAKER_02
Yeah, because I think that s what many of us scientists are a little bit detailed obsessed, but I think that s our job too, right?
6
SPEAKER_02
To really kind of make it airtight, to really walk away saying, I fully understand this.
6
SPEAKER_02
not just broadly, but we really know now.
6
SPEAKER_02
And so more and more of that is going to happen.
6
SPEAKER_02
And so I think this is probably true across astronomy, these individual 10 Sigma discoveries become less and less.
6
SPEAKER_02
If they were easy, we would have made them already, right?
6
SPEAKER_02
Which means we have made many of them.
6
SPEAKER_02
But really filling in the details is the next sort of level of discovery.
6
SPEAKER_02
Maybe we need to find a new word for that.
6
SPEAKER_02
The hopes and expectations that go along with the word discovery are so enormous, we may not always be able to live up to that.
6
SPEAKER_02
But it doesn t mean that we re not finding out new things.
6
SPEAKER_02
It s just a different kind of quality because the questions have shifted.
6
SPEAKER_02
You close one door, suddenly there are 10 new open doors that we want to explore and march through.
6
SPEAKER_02
And that s finding these last puzzle pieces here and there that really make it airtight.
6
SPEAKER_01
And so there s a lot of value and a lot of power and beauty to the discovery in the big picture of our universe and in the details.
6
SPEAKER_01
So both are really important.
6
SPEAKER_01
Perhaps drifting into the philosophical, let me ask about the Big Bang as we kind of encroach onto it.
6
SPEAKER_01
So your work is kind of taking steps back through time in a weird way.
6
SPEAKER_01
Do you think we ll get to deeper and deeper understand the Big Bang?
6
SPEAKER_01
the really, really early days of the Big Bang.
6
SPEAKER_01
And the philosophical question, do you think we ll be able to understand what was before the Big Bang, or why the Big Bang happened?
6
SPEAKER_01
Do you think about that stuff?
6
SPEAKER_02
Not with stars, for better or for worse, because stars only probe the time when they were formed, and the Big Bang is surely before then.
6
SPEAKER_02
I mean, I often talk to my students about the difference between math and physics.
6
SPEAKER_02
Let me give you an example.
6
SPEAKER_02
We talked earlier about Hg1523, and I was happy to share with you that I measure thorium and uranium, but I actually didn t quite close that loop.
6
SPEAKER_02
So we did this to try to attempt to calculate an age for these stars.
6
SPEAKER_02
But they rely on us knowing how the R process works, how these elements are created, where it happens, and then how those elements get dispersed into the gas and end up in the next generation star.
6
SPEAKER_02
So quite a few question marks.
6
SPEAKER_02
So that s how we got to the age of 13.2 billion years.
6
SPEAKER_02
This is probably not accurate, but this is the best calculation we could do.
6
SPEAKER_02
And the reason why I m bringing this up is that that was actually the average of multiple elemental ratios that each gave a certain age.
6
SPEAKER_02
And then we averaged that because for better or for worse, this is the best we can do.
6
SPEAKER_02
So some of these numbers said, oh, this star is 15 billion years old.
6
SPEAKER_02
And then others said, oh, this is 10 billion years old.
6
SPEAKER_02
And so I often use that in my class to say like, what s the good news and what s the bad news here?
6
SPEAKER_02
Some ratios say 15, some say 10, right?
6
SPEAKER_02
Is 15 correct?
6
SPEAKER_02
And then I asked them and some people will say something.
6
SPEAKER_02
And so the thing here is that it s an absolutely correct calculation given the mathematical and physical model that we constructed.
6
SPEAKER_02
But does it make sense?
6
SPEAKER_02
No, it doesn t.
6
SPEAKER_02
If we believe the universe is 13.8 billion years old, 15 is ridiculous, yet it is correct.
6
SPEAKER_02
Isn t that interesting?
6
SPEAKER_01
Correct from a mathematics perspective.
6
SPEAKER_02
Yes, it is not incorrect because this is what I calculated.
6
SPEAKER_02
Nobody made a mistake.
6
SPEAKER_02
Now, we can question whether that s a good model, but that s a separate issue.
6
SPEAKER_00
So you re saying physicists are much closer to truth than mathematicians.
6
SPEAKER_02
Well, it depends.
6
SPEAKER_02
Sometimes yes and sometimes no, right?
6
SPEAKER_02
So what our job as physicists is, is to take the mathematical model, calculate our numbers, and then ask the question, does this make sense?
6
SPEAKER_02
Right?
6
SPEAKER_02
Now, in the case of 15, it doesn t, but
6
SPEAKER_02
We took the average anyway because that was the best we could do, right?
6
SPEAKER_02
So, all right, let s put that aside.
6
SPEAKER_02
Let s apply the same sort of thinking to the Big Bang, right?
6
SPEAKER_02
Math can tell us things that we as physicists cannot grasp because it doesn t make sense to us.
6
SPEAKER_02
Now, in the case of the Big Bang, that s a special case because we don t actually know what s supposed to make sense.
6
SPEAKER_02
And this is where things get interesting.
6
SPEAKER_02
But this is where math will ultimately be the winner.
6
SPEAKER_02
because we can no longer say this makes sense or this doesn t make sense because the physics is broken down.
6
SPEAKER_01
But math breaks down too in the singularity of things.
6
SPEAKER_02
Well, depending on who you ask.
6
SPEAKER_01
Sure, sure.
6
SPEAKER_02
This is the current question, right?
6
SPEAKER_02
How far, how much further can we push math, let s say, to the front of the Big Bang, if there is such a thing?
6
SPEAKER_01
What s the front and the back?
6
SPEAKER_01
What s the front?
6
SPEAKER_01
Well, before the Big Bang.
6
SPEAKER_01
Oh, before the Big Bang, the front, okay.
6
SPEAKER_01
Just to clarify, all the doorways and the entrances.
6
SPEAKER_02
So how far can we let the math go before that stops to make sense, right?
6
SPEAKER_02
And I don t know what the answer is to that, but it s really cool that because math is not limited by our physical nature.
6
SPEAKER_02
it can probably go a little bit further than the physics, right?
6
SPEAKER_01
And math can go into more dimensions than four dimensions comfortably.
6
SPEAKER_02
And it s judgment-free because it just calculates things on its own.
6
SPEAKER_02
Whereas as physicists, we are so judgmental.
6
SPEAKER_02
This makes sense, this doesn t make sense, right?
6
SPEAKER_02
It doesn t get any worse.
6
SPEAKER_01
It s such a beautiful dance.
6
SPEAKER_01
It s so amazing that through this dance, you get to explore the origins of the universe.
6
SPEAKER_01
Doesn t the Big Bang just blow your mind?
6
SPEAKER_01
That this thing has just started from a point.
6
SPEAKER_01
And now we re here.
6
SPEAKER_01
Hydrogen and helium.
6
SPEAKER_01
And then all the stuff you re studying, I mean, this evolution of chemistry created humans.
6
SPEAKER_01
And we re here talking.
6
SPEAKER_01
And there s a lot more to the story.
6
SPEAKER_01
It s amazing.
6
SPEAKER_01
And this kind of march that you re doing is observing data.
6
SPEAKER_01
Is there,
6
SPEAKER_01
you re looking at old light and old data.
6
SPEAKER_02
But only a few thousand years, right?
6
SPEAKER_02
Just a few thousand years.
6
SPEAKER_02
That s the difference between me and my JWT colleagues.
6
SPEAKER_02
Their objects, that light has traveled 13 billion years or whatever it was to us and they re observing that now.
6
SPEAKER_02
My light has only traveled a few thousand years.
6
SPEAKER_02
It s nothing.
6
SPEAKER_01
So whatever you observe now is likely still going on.
6
SPEAKER_02
Yes, these stars are alive and kicking and having a blast.
6
SPEAKER_01
a thousand years, just a few thousand years, that s all it takes.
6
SPEAKER_01
If we can travel close to the speed of light, maybe we can reach out there.
6
SPEAKER_02
We wouldn t have any planets around those stars, though.
6
SPEAKER_01
So that s, is that a definitive intuition?
6
SPEAKER_02
Well, what are planets made of?
6
SPEAKER_02
Elements, right?
6
SPEAKER_02
To take the Earth as all heavy elements, right?
6
SPEAKER_02
The universe needed to reach a certain stage first to have produced enough of all these elements to actually make a planet.
6
SPEAKER_01
So on average you re, so okay, right.
6
SPEAKER_02
So that took quite a few billion years.
6
SPEAKER_01
So they re not going to have a mechanism for forming planets.
6
SPEAKER_01
You could have visitors probably, but the kinematics of that are weird, are unlikely.
6
SPEAKER_02
Yeah, I would say so.
6
SPEAKER_02
Okay.
6
SPEAKER_01
So they re interesting in that they reveal the early chemical evolution of the universe.
6
SPEAKER_02
Yes.
6
SPEAKER_01
Not that they re, they could be good vacation spots, but not.
6
SPEAKER_02
Well, if you like a warm.
6
SPEAKER_02
There s no planet islands to go to, to chill.
6
SPEAKER_01
In your book, you highlight the major contributions in the field,
7
SPEAKER_00
by many women.
7
SPEAKER_00
Some of these women were not, as you describe, immediately credited for their discoveries.
7
SPEAKER_00
So for me, from computer science perspective, the story also tells Harvard Computers, who were these women and what can you just say about the nature of science and humanity?
7
SPEAKER_01
discovering things is part of the human nature, right?
7
SPEAKER_01
And so it has happened for the longest time, not just by men, but also by many women.
7
SPEAKER_01
The field of stellar astronomy, which is my field, has particularly benefited from many discoveries made by women.
7
SPEAKER_01
You mentioned the Harvard computers, that s a term used for
7
SPEAKER_01
women who worked about 100 years ago at the Harvard College Observatory, and they were hired for their low wages and willingness to do diligent and patient work to comb through the big data of the day.
7
SPEAKER_01
So the observatory director, they were carrying out large sky surveys at the time, and they needed
7
SPEAKER_01
that data needed to be processed and looked at and analyzed.
7
SPEAKER_01
And so many women or several dozens, one or two dozen women over the years were hired to do this work.
7
SPEAKER_01
And in the process,
7
SPEAKER_01
because they were looking at the actual data and they were smart, even though they had often no formal education, they made a lot of discoveries simply by being in tune with what they were doing.
7
SPEAKER_01
So they weren t robots, as you know, the term computer would perhaps lead on.
7
SPEAKER_01
So, any jump cannon classified,
7
SPEAKER_01
thousands and thousands of spectra and found out that stars have different temperatures and their spectra look according.
7
SPEAKER_01
We still use that classification sequence today.
7
SPEAKER_01
Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin later on in 1925 was one of the first women to obtain a PhD in stellar astronomy, and she calculated that the Sun is mostly made of hydrogen and helium.
7
SPEAKER_01
That seems normal to many of us these days, but at the time, it was thought that celestial objects are made of the same thing as the Earth.
7
SPEAKER_00
That s a gutsy, amazing discovery.
7
SPEAKER_01
Yes.
7
SPEAKER_01
It was later termed the most important thesis of humankind or something like that.
7
SPEAKER_01
What a revelation to realize that stars are made of hydrogen and helium, right?
7
SPEAKER_01
This was exactly the time when people figured out why stars are shining, namely because of nuclear fusion and that it s protons and, you know, the tunneling effect that leads to the actual fusion.
7
SPEAKER_01
Otherwise, you know, the protons repulse each other.
7
SPEAKER_01
They don t come together.
7
SPEAKER_01
And so what an incredible time it was back then.
7
SPEAKER_01
And so stars and nuclear physics were very closely related and it remains.
7
SPEAKER_01
Now it s called nuclear astrophysics.
7
SPEAKER_01
And so many women had many contributions to that.
7
SPEAKER_01
Of course, prior to that, Marie Curie discovered two new elements.
7
SPEAKER_01
Ah, so awesome.
7
SPEAKER_01
Radium and polonium.
7
SPEAKER_01
Lisa Meitner discovered nuclear fission.
7
SPEAKER_01
That is the basis for understanding the hour process.
7
SPEAKER_01
This is exactly what happens.
7
SPEAKER_01
In the R process, the heavy nuclei, let s say uranium, if you bombard it with a neutron, we talked at length about it, it will decay, it will fission, it will split,
7
SPEAKER_01
into barium and krypton, let s say, so two lighter elements.
7
SPEAKER_01
That s exactly what we observe.
7
SPEAKER_01
I have always a higher abundance of barium than the heavier elements because of this fission cycling that she calculated in 1938, 1939.
7
SPEAKER_01
So many, many contributions, and it s just so remarkable.
7
SPEAKER_01
If you just take that body of work, that changed how we
7
SPEAKER_01
how we do things, how we see the universe, how we understand things has led to so many subsequent discoveries, good ones and bad.
7
SPEAKER_00
Well, all of it is taken together.
7
SPEAKER_01
That s progress, right?
7
SPEAKER_01
Science is what it is.
7
SPEAKER_01
We have to decide what we do with that knowledge, right?
7
SPEAKER_01
We can always use things for good or for bad.
7
SPEAKER_01
That s part of the human endeavor as well.
7
SPEAKER_00
And also part of the human endeavor and the human nature is the issues with corruption and credit assignment and all these kinds of things that make this whole ride so damn interesting about what s right and wrong and about the nature of good and evil.
7
SPEAKER_00
And that seems to surface itself in all kinds of places all the time.
7
SPEAKER_01
Yes, yes.
7
SPEAKER_01
Lisa Meitner was nominated for the Nobel Prize 40 times, more than that even.
7
SPEAKER_01
It s amazing.
7
SPEAKER_01
She holds the record for that.
7
SPEAKER_01
She never received it.
7
SPEAKER_01
So, case in point.
7
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, and of course the Nobel Prize has its complexities.
7
SPEAKER_00
One is the credit assignment, but two, even in astronomy, sort of assigning credit to a handful of folks when so many more contributed is a complicated story also.
7
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, it s very complex.
7
SPEAKER_00
Okay, sorry for the romantic question, but what to you is the most beautiful idea in astronomy, in stellar astronomy?
7
SPEAKER_01
So early on, you know, when I was in high school, I was thinking like, okay, what do I want to do when I grow up, right?
7
SPEAKER_01
I knew I wanted to do astronomy, but I was a little bit torn because my interests were definitely stars, stellar astronomy, but also chemistry.
7
SPEAKER_01
I always had a fascination about the elements, so Marie Curie was a big role model.
7
SPEAKER_01
My friend actually produced a beautiful movie about the discovery of the elements.
7
SPEAKER_01
It s a theater play, but digitized, where when I saw it, I could actually kind of relive the sort of discovery moment that Marie Curie had.
7
SPEAKER_01
It sent shivers down my spine.
7
SPEAKER_01
It was fantastic.
7
SPEAKER_01
I mean, this is the kind of thing that I wanted to experience.
7
SPEAKER_01
But yeah, so nuclear physics and element creation and formation was really interesting to me, chemistry, the elements, stars and all of that.
7
SPEAKER_01
And I was like, I don t know if I ever find something that combines all of these things.
7
SPEAKER_01
And then I ended up in Australia and I met this person and he was working on old stars.
7
SPEAKER_01
And as I was sitting in his talk, hearing about this for the first time,
7
SPEAKER_01
it kind of, it clicked all over my head and it s like, oh my God, it all fell in place because we can use these old stars to study the elements, to learn how they re formed.
7
SPEAKER_01
We can get these clean signatures that help us inform the nucleosynthesis processes, you know, and I know, of course, I need to know a lot about stars too.
7
SPEAKER_01
So it s like all together and that was sort of a moment of magic
7
SPEAKER_01
And then the fact that I have now done that for 20 years, it s just like, I won the lottery.
7
SPEAKER_00
It all clicked into place.
7
SPEAKER_01
And so, in some sense, it s an ongoing love story for me, if I could say it like that, where, you know, I found my stars, my thing, and I am fortunate enough to be able to keep doing that.
7
SPEAKER_01
And I m happy to
7
SPEAKER_01
see where it will take me.
7
SPEAKER_01
It s an evolution, as with every relationship.
7
SPEAKER_01
If you don t march forward, you move backwards.
7
SPEAKER_01
I m not interested in moving backwards, so I m letting the field and the discoveries and the findings lead me to, and I m often
7
SPEAKER_01
It s not hard for me to follow my hunches and sometimes even at the telescope it s like, let s take a look at this one.
7
SPEAKER_01
I have a good feeling.
7
SPEAKER_01
And then usually something good or not bad pops out at the end.
7
SPEAKER_01
I really like that, A, that I have the freedom to do that, that I m allowed to follow my hunches.
7
SPEAKER_01
Too many people, I think, are sort of boxed in with their job or their life, that they don t have that kind of freedom.
7
SPEAKER_01
That s really important to me and I certainly try to make use of that.
7
SPEAKER_01
I also try to teach that to others, to trust them, to learn.
7
SPEAKER_01
You need to learn your things, but then you need to also trust that knowledge and that you have a grasp on it, right?
7
SPEAKER_01
You get out what you put in.
7
SPEAKER_01
and being able to contribute in meaningful ways to our knowledge about our cosmic ancestry, our cosmic history, that s a wonderful thing.
7
SPEAKER_00
And in this way, your personal love story with the stars evolves.
7
SPEAKER_00
What advice, you ve already spoken to it a little bit, but what advice would you give to young people that are trying to find the same kind of love story in their career, in their life?
7
SPEAKER_01
It seems increasingly hard for folks to find that.
7
SPEAKER_01
Sometimes I feel that young people have all the opportunities these days, and that s wonderful, but it s almost like that leads to some,
7
SPEAKER_01
What s the right word?
7
SPEAKER_01
They re a little bit too tired to make all the decisions because at some point you need to put your eggs in a basket and you need to be okay with that.
7
SPEAKER_01
We can t do all the things, even though we re often told you can be president too.
7
SPEAKER_01
And I think that s really important to convey.
7
SPEAKER_01
But at the end of the day, we can only have sort of one job or one type of profession.
7
SPEAKER_01
I m not saying you need to be locked in, but it s hard to change 180 degrees.
7
SPEAKER_01
And so lots of people I think are often afraid to really dig in, at least for some time and get their hands real dirty and really learn from the bottom up.
7
SPEAKER_00
On one thing.
7
SPEAKER_01
On one thing, because they re afraid they re missing out on 99 other things.
7
SPEAKER_01
But life is a little bit missing out on 99 other things because we only have 24 hours in a day.
7
SPEAKER_01
I have that feeling very often.
7
SPEAKER_01
There are so many things I would like to do, many things I would like to try to be good at.
7
SPEAKER_01
Sometimes I wish I had a different job.
7
SPEAKER_01
Because I have other interests too, but I realized, okay, I can only do one thing, so I have no regrets.
7
SPEAKER_01
But this is a general feeling that I think most of us have.
7
SPEAKER_01
But if it stops you from really drilling down on one thing, to become an expert in one thing, to become really good at one thing that you call your own, then it just makes it difficult.
7
SPEAKER_00
And so a fulfilling life is in part likely to be discovered in the singular pursuit of a thing, of one thing.
7
SPEAKER_00
At least for a time.
7
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, for some time, with your heart and your hands.
7
SPEAKER_01
Because I think most people long to own something.
7
SPEAKER_01
You know, we all, I think, want to leave some legacy of some sorts, you know, for our children, for humanity, for this planet.
7
SPEAKER_01
And I think it s really important for young people to strive for that and not lose sight or trade that for all the opportunities, because an opportunity is nothing if you don t do anything.
7
SPEAKER_01
You need to do something at the end of the day.
7
SPEAKER_01
So I chat with lots of people about this, and I often start by just saying, hey, tell me what you don t like.
7
SPEAKER_01
Because it s often much easier to, you know, let out what s not on your plate.
7
SPEAKER_01
And then this way we get a little bit closer.
7
SPEAKER_01
And then it s like, well, why don t you take a risk?
7
SPEAKER_01
and just sign up for something for three months.
7
SPEAKER_00
You can afford that.
7
SPEAKER_00
That s what it feels like, and it is that, is a risk.
7
SPEAKER_00
Commitment is a risk.
7
SPEAKER_01
Yes.
7
SPEAKER_00
Because it s, you re basically sacrificing all the other possible options.
7
SPEAKER_00
But then I guess you have to trust the magic you noticed in that thing.
7
SPEAKER_01
Yes.
7
SPEAKER_00
If you notice one thing, just stick with it.
7
SPEAKER_00
And then maybe there s something there.
7
SPEAKER_01
Right, right.
7
SPEAKER_01
And this moment of kind of feeling it in your entire body and mind that this is the right thing, you know, getting there is probably really hard.
7
SPEAKER_01
But if you don t try, you won t find out.
7
SPEAKER_00
The hard stuff is the fun stuff.
7
SPEAKER_00
That s also another thing you find out.
7
SPEAKER_01
And then there is that, yes.
7
SPEAKER_00
Somehow, it doesn t make sense.
7
SPEAKER_00
You also mentioned that you ve taken a little stroll into the artistic representation of yourself.
7
SPEAKER_00
Can you speak to that for a little bit?
7
SPEAKER_01
Well, I already just mentioned, sometimes I wish I had more time to do other things, so I find little sideways, I guess, to pursue things that I like besides astronomy, or at least I try to find connections.
7
SPEAKER_01
And so, some years ago, again, with the help of my friend who made this Marie Curie movie,
7
SPEAKER_01
She and I wrote a one-woman play where I actually portray Lisa Meitner, who was an Austrian-German nuclear physicist.
7
SPEAKER_01
I m from Germany, so I have the right accent for that.
7
SPEAKER_01
And we wrote this play about this moment of discovery of nuclear fission.
7
SPEAKER_01
an absolutely critical piece that explains my work today and we all stand on the shoulder of giants.
7
SPEAKER_01
She was one of those giants and in some ways it s of course a way for me to acknowledge other people s work that have come before me.
7
SPEAKER_01
It s a wonderful way to highlight the contribution by a prominent woman.
7
SPEAKER_01
And the way I do it is it s a 25-minute play in costume where I relive for people the moment of discovery.
7
SPEAKER_01
Then I turn into myself, and then I give a 30-minute presentation on the art process and the creation of heavy elements, because the audience can now perfectly understand that, the public audience, given the historic backdrop of this discovery, that they just lived through my presentation.
7
SPEAKER_01
And it s a wonderful compliment that almost spends 100 years, from one woman to the next, passing on the torch.
7
SPEAKER_01
And, you know, when we write up our results in, let s say, you know, in magazines like Nature and Science, it s always about the results on the golden platter, perfectly prepared.
7
SPEAKER_01
The discovery is never described, only ever the results.
7
SPEAKER_01
You asked me beforehand, right, what does it feel to be at the telescope in this moment, right?
7
SPEAKER_01
I m happy to talk about this, but it s nowhere written, never.
7
SPEAKER_01
Nobody really talks about it.
7
SPEAKER_01
And so having a form of, you know, theater of the arts to bring this exciting moment that is what we all want to experience as scientists to a wider audience
7
SPEAKER_01
is so profound and so rewarding and they all love it because everyone can understand a moment of discovery.
7
SPEAKER_01
I was looking for something and then I found it.
7
SPEAKER_01
It s like you misplaced car keys, right?
7
SPEAKER_00
Or love.
7
SPEAKER_01
Yes, yes, everyone can understand it.
7
SPEAKER_00
What a glorious experience, yes.
7
SPEAKER_01
The implications and the findings, that is much harder to understand for anyone.
7
SPEAKER_01
This is where the scientist s work truly lies, this is our job.
7
SPEAKER_01
But the moment of discovery is easy, and it s beautiful, and it needs to be said.
7
SPEAKER_01
And so taking my audience on this journey, what is the perils, what are my worries,
8
SPEAKER_01
and oh, here is the moment of discovery.
8
SPEAKER_01
Let me tell you about it.
8
SPEAKER_01
It profoundly transformed me, and here s how it went, right?
8
SPEAKER_01
It s so good.
8
SPEAKER_00
And art is a way to reveal this fundamentally human side of science.
8
SPEAKER_01
Yes, the problem with science is that it s people doing it.
8
SPEAKER_00
That s also what makes it beautiful, right?
8
SPEAKER_00
I mean, humans are fascinating and that we re able to come up with these ideas through all the struggle, through all the hardship, through all the hope, through all the search.
8
SPEAKER_01
And so the art s a great way to portray that and to broadcast that, right?
8
SPEAKER_01
I think this is how the audience really should be interacting with scientists.
8
SPEAKER_01
Much less about the findings, but really more about this yearning for answers, right?
8
SPEAKER_01
I need to find these khakis.
8
SPEAKER_01
I need it because I need to go, right?
8
SPEAKER_01
It s like now, now!
8
SPEAKER_01
And then, oh God, here it is.
8
SPEAKER_01
Now I can go my merry ways.
8
SPEAKER_01
It s so relatable.
8
SPEAKER_01
We just need to find more and better ways to do that.
8
SPEAKER_01
So I hope to turn this into also a digitized version at some point to again make it more accessible.
8
SPEAKER_00
I hope so too.
8
SPEAKER_00
I would love to see it.
8
SPEAKER_01
So far I m just doing it in person.
8
SPEAKER_01
But it s a very nice thing.
8
SPEAKER_00
I would love it.
8
SPEAKER_00
I think a lot of people would love to see it.
8
SPEAKER_00
So I hope you do just that.
8
SPEAKER_00
Let me ask you a big ridiculous question.
8
SPEAKER_00
You look up at the stars.
8
SPEAKER_00
You look up at the early, early, early stars.
8
SPEAKER_00
So let me ask the big question that we humans often ask and struggle to answer.
8
SPEAKER_00
What s the meaning of this whole thing?
8
SPEAKER_00
Why are we here?
8
SPEAKER_01
We talked about, you know, the biological evolution requires the chemical evolution for all of this to kind of play out.
8
SPEAKER_01
And carbon played this important role.
8
SPEAKER_01
And, you know, in some sense, we re just a consequence of all of these things being the way they are, right?
8
SPEAKER_01
And maybe this is just where we are supposed to be, because, you know, the laws of physics sort of work the way they do.
8
SPEAKER_01
And we talked much about the variety of everything, really, and certainly, you know, from over here to over there.
8
SPEAKER_01
things in the vicinity of where the Sun and the solar system formed, they were the way they were and life maybe was a necessary consequence of that.
8
SPEAKER_01
In some sense, I like to believe that because then it becomes reproducible and we can apply that same argument elsewhere.
8
SPEAKER_01
If it s total chance, right, that makes it harder.
8
SPEAKER_01
That s not truly satisfying to a scientist.
8
SPEAKER_00
So it s a consequence of psychological evolution, which is a consequence of biological evolution, which is a consequence of chemical evolution, consequence of physical evolution, whatever disciplines.
8
SPEAKER_00
It s turtles on top of turtles.
8
SPEAKER_01
Turtles all the way down, yes.
8
SPEAKER_01
I, yeah, I mean.
8
SPEAKER_00
And you have studied some of the most ancient turtles.
8
SPEAKER_00
Yes.
8
SPEAKER_00
At the very bottom of the thing.
8
SPEAKER_01
That s right, that s right.
8
SPEAKER_01
They live for quite a while.
8
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, they do.
8
SPEAKER_00
Well, thank you for your incredible work.
8
SPEAKER_00
Thank you for highlighting both the human side and the deep scientific side.
8
SPEAKER_00
It s just, I m a huge fan of your work and thank you for everything you do.
8
SPEAKER_00
And thank you for talking today.
8
SPEAKER_00
This was awesome.
8
SPEAKER_01
Of course, it was wonderful.
8
SPEAKER_01
Thank you.
8
SPEAKER_00
Thanks for listening to this conversation with Adam Fabel.
8
SPEAKER_00
To support this podcast, please check out our sponsors in the description.
8
SPEAKER_00
And now, let me leave you with some words from Douglas Adams in Hitchhiker s Guide to the Galaxy.
8
SPEAKER_00
Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of the galaxy lies a small, unregarded yellow sun.
8
SPEAKER_00
Orbiting this, at a distance of roughly 92 million miles, is an utterly insignificant little blue-green planet whose Abe-descendant lifeforms are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea.
8
SPEAKER_00
Thank you for listening, and I hope to see you next time.