0
SPEAKER_01
Hi, it s Elise Lunen, host of Pulling the Thread.
0
SPEAKER_01
Today, I m joined by the brilliant neuroscientist David Eagleman, author of many bestselling books, including Some and Livewired.
0
SPEAKER_01
Hi, it s Elise Lunen, host of Pulling the Thread.
0
SPEAKER_01
On this show, we pull apart the web in which we all live to understand who we are and why we re here.
0
SPEAKER_01
Pulling the Thread is about big questions.
0
SPEAKER_01
Why we do what we do, how we can understand our own experiences within a larger spiritual and historical context, the ways in which we might begin to understand ourselves and each other better, and what s required to heal ourselves and our world.
0
SPEAKER_01
I ll be joined in conversation by luminaries and wise elders, those who have laid tracks in their work and lives to help us bring meaning and understanding to a world that often feels chaotic and overwhelming.
0
SPEAKER_01
My hope is that these conversations spark moments of resonance and plant tiny seeds of awareness so that we might all collectively learn and grow.
0
SPEAKER_00
As you grow older, your brain is able to keep rewiring all the time.
0
SPEAKER_00
So we have this impression that
0
SPEAKER_00
the flexibility of the brain decreases as you get older.
0
SPEAKER_00
But in fact, it s just because your brain s job is just to figure out how to get by in the world and do a good job in the world.
0
SPEAKER_00
And once you ve figured most things out, like, oh, these are different kinds of personalities, and this is how I need to do something at work, and this is how I use email and phone and whatever, then your brain does less changing
0
SPEAKER_00
only because it has successfully done its job and it doesn t need to keep changing.
0
SPEAKER_00
The brain changes when there s surprise, when there s something that happened that it wasn t expecting, then it changes up.
0
SPEAKER_00
So, you still have plenty of plasticity even when you re 90 years old, it s just that most people aren t using it at that point because they say, oh, I got it, I know how things work.
0
SPEAKER_01
So says David Eagleman, renowned neuroscientist, podcast host, and the author of many best-selling books about consciousness and the brain, along with more than 120 academic publications.
0
SPEAKER_01
Besides his perch as a neuroscientist at Stanford University, David is the co-founder of two venture-backed companies, including Neosensory, which is a pioneering wrist device that enables the deaf to hear.
0
SPEAKER_01
Yep, that s right.
0
SPEAKER_01
David is fascinating, and hopefully this conversation lives up to his capacity.
0
SPEAKER_01
We discuss the malleability of the brain to adjust to its inputs, the roots of synesthesia, how those who are born blind and deaf can now use touch to see and hear, and why we dream.
0
SPEAKER_01
Ultimately, we explore just how it happens that a brain trapped in a dark vault can create the vibrancy of our existence.
0
SPEAKER_01
David is a TED speaker, a Guggenheim Fellow, and serves on several boards, including the American Brain Foundation and the Long Now Foundation.
0
SPEAKER_01
He is the chief scientific advisor for the MindScience Foundation and the winner of Claude Shannon Luminary Award for Bell Labs and the McGovern Award for Excellence in Biomedical Communication.
0
SPEAKER_01
What s cooler, he s also served as a scientific advisor to several television shows, including Westworld and Perception.
0
SPEAKER_01
Ironically, considering we both host podcasts and David is a neuroscientist, we had some technical difficulties during our conversation.
0
SPEAKER_01
But the hope is that this is not perceptible to you.
0
SPEAKER_01
Let s turn to our conversation now.
0
SPEAKER_01
You re fascinating to me.
0
SPEAKER_01
And we re going to talk about maybe spiky intelligence or the way that the brain adapts itself to its inputs, right?
0
SPEAKER_01
So I was reading Livewired.
0
SPEAKER_01
So that s what I ve been steeping my own brain in.
0
SPEAKER_01
And in it, you write about, for example, musicians and the way that they get the omega or the double omega based on, maybe not all musicians, but based on whether they re doing a one or two hand piano versus a violin.
0
SPEAKER_01
When you think about your own brain,
0
SPEAKER_01
And so I m a writer, you re a writer.
0
SPEAKER_01
I have some other skills and talents, but I would say that s where like the spike of my intelligence lives.
0
SPEAKER_01
I m not a scientist.
0
SPEAKER_01
I m sorry to tell you, David, I m sure you re devastated to hear that.
0
SPEAKER_01
But why are you so non-spiky and yet so excellent in so many spheres?
0
SPEAKER_00
Oh, that s very kind.
0
SPEAKER_00
That s a nice compliment.
0
SPEAKER_00
I feel like art and science are actually quite similar in that they re both just trying to get to know the world.
0
SPEAKER_00
They re just trying to understand what is going on around us.
0
SPEAKER_00
They just have slightly different approaches to getting there.
0
SPEAKER_00
So in the laboratory,
0
SPEAKER_00
We have ways of imagining a new model of something that no one has ever suggested before.
0
SPEAKER_00
And we think, wait, what if that s right?
0
SPEAKER_00
And then we have very specific ways of trying to get there.
0
SPEAKER_00
You do experiments, you try to prove that s right.
0
SPEAKER_00
And most of the time it s wrong.
0
SPEAKER_00
Most of the time you leap to some island and you try to build a bridge there and you realize, oh, I guess that that can t be right.
0
SPEAKER_00
But in art, in writing, you know, you leap to some island and then you can explore around there.
0
SPEAKER_00
and you don t have the same constraints in terms of what you need to do.
0
SPEAKER_00
But they re both trying to do the same thing, which is, hey, what is going on and how can we think about imaginary creative worlds here?
0
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, well, it s interesting to think about the multiple spaces that you occupy, both as a storyteller and storyteller about science.
0
SPEAKER_01
And it s almost like you re involved in a dual exploration, one about the brain and one about the mind.
0
SPEAKER_01
And I know that the two theoretically have some sort of shared origin source, but reading your book about the brain is so fascinating because I learned so much.
0
SPEAKER_01
And yet, like at the end you talk about maybe someday we ll have a whole new field of science where you ll be able to run a brain like a video projector and understand someone s life, right?
0
SPEAKER_00
Sort of.
0
SPEAKER_00
So we re infinitely far from that.
0
SPEAKER_00
Maybe there ll be thousands of years from now.
0
SPEAKER_00
But yeah, the argument I was making at the end of the book is simply that everything in your brain, every experience you ve had, the language you ve learned, the parents you ve had, the lovers you ve had, the neighbors, everything in your brain is stored in the exact configuration of these eighty six billion brain cells, neurons and their connections between them and the exact strength of the connections between them.
0
SPEAKER_00
And so in theory, if we found a brain, we could read it out.
0
SPEAKER_00
The entire story of your life is scribbled in there.
0
SPEAKER_00
It s simply that it s in a script that we don t know how to read yet.
0
SPEAKER_00
And in fact, the computational capacity that would be required to read it would be about a zettabyte of information, which is about a quarter of the computational capacity of the planet right now.
0
SPEAKER_00
So it s not like this is going to happen anytime soon.
0
SPEAKER_00
But in theory,
0
SPEAKER_00
everything about Elise is stored in this structure and we could know it all.
0
SPEAKER_01
And you would be able to sort of understand my history, right?
0
SPEAKER_01
Or like the patterning of my thoughts or maybe my thoughts or encoded memories.
0
SPEAKER_01
Do you think that then we really start to understand consciousness?
0
SPEAKER_01
Not to go like right off the deep end, because we re going to back up a bit too, but
0
SPEAKER_00
Let me answer the first part about could we understand your history?
0
SPEAKER_00
The answer is only as well as you understand your history.
0
SPEAKER_00
In other words, everything in your life is not actually written down in your brain.
0
SPEAKER_00
It s not etched into your brain cells and certainly not accurately.
0
SPEAKER_00
So all we would be able to have, and again, I want to emphasize this is theoretical, this is maybe, you know, a thousand or ten thousand years from now, is knowing your version of your life, which, of course, memory is a myth making machine and you re constantly reinventing your past to keep it consistent with who you think you are.
0
SPEAKER_00
So it s not like we would have an accurate record of something.
0
SPEAKER_00
But yes, we would know something about you and what things you like and the kind of thoughts you have.
0
SPEAKER_01
It s amazing.
0
SPEAKER_01
Do you have a theory of consciousness?
0
SPEAKER_01
The book is such a beautiful explication of not the machinery because it s so much more alive than that, but you mentioned Mother Nature.
0
SPEAKER_01
You capitalize Mother Nature throughout the book.
0
SPEAKER_01
Or maybe you can t say because you re a scientist.
0
SPEAKER_01
Is Mother Nature simply that?
0
SPEAKER_01
Like a biological urge to engage with the world in the way that we sort of adapt, evolve, and grow?
0
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, let s back up a few steps.
0
SPEAKER_00
When I talk about mother nature, I m talking about, you know, nature, which is how we got here.
0
SPEAKER_00
We are natural creatures.
0
SPEAKER_00
We evolved for many millions of years in our species, but billions of years for unicellular and then multicellular life forms.
0
SPEAKER_00
And so we have a planet that is here full of life, teeming with life, screaming with life because it s a natural process.
0
SPEAKER_00
And, and in fact, you know, complexity theorists,
0
SPEAKER_00
look at this by saying, if you just take a planet and you simmer it at the right distance from a star, you really can t help but have it sprout with life like a chia pet.
0
SPEAKER_00
There s not something so rare about life.
0
SPEAKER_00
It s actually, life s hard to hold down, which is great.
0
SPEAKER_00
But anyway, so when I talk about Mother Nature and the evolution of the brain, I m talking about all the forces that got us here.
0
SPEAKER_00
And now what we ve got is this
1
SPEAKER_01
masterpiece of evolution, which is the most complicated thing that we ve ever found in the universe.
1
SPEAKER_01
And it is you.
1
SPEAKER_01
It is all your hopes, your dreams, your aspirations, the agony, the ecstasy.
1
SPEAKER_01
It s all happening in these three pounds in your skull.
1
SPEAKER_01
And the way we the reason we know that is because if you, let s say, hurt your pinky or something, you d be sad about that.
1
SPEAKER_01
But you wouldn t be any different as a person.
1
SPEAKER_01
You d still be at least that we all know and love.
1
SPEAKER_01
But if you damage an equivalent size little chunk of brain tissue, that can change you entirely.
1
SPEAKER_01
That can change your decision making, your risk aversion, your capacity to see colors or understand music or name animals or a hundred other things that we see in the clinics every day.
1
SPEAKER_01
And that s how we know that this brain tissue, this three pounds of very delicate pink stuff that Mother Nature keeps protected in the armored bunker plating of the skull,
1
SPEAKER_01
That is you.
1
SPEAKER_01
That s the densest representation of you that there is.
1
SPEAKER_00
I m Rachel Martin.
1
SPEAKER_00
After hosting Morning Edition for years, I know that the news can wear you down.
1
SPEAKER_00
So we made a new podcast called Wild Card, where a special deck of cards and a whole bunch of fascinating guests help us sort out what makes life meaningful.
1
SPEAKER_00
It s part game show, part existential deep dive, and it is seriously fun.
1
SPEAKER_00
Join me on Wild Card, wherever you get your podcasts.
1
SPEAKER_00
Only from NPR.
1
SPEAKER_02
So when you write about, it s quite miraculous, right?
1
SPEAKER_02
That this brain caged in our heads in a vault of darkness is responsible for encoding, decoding all of our sensorial experiences.
1
SPEAKER_02
and can map to our body, map to the world in a way that s just stunning.
1
SPEAKER_02
I mean, the book, it s clearly of so much of your personal interest, right?
1
SPEAKER_02
A lot of your lab devoted to understanding how to transform sight into touch and to create these sort of belts and bands so that people can
1
SPEAKER_02
see through feeling.
1
SPEAKER_02
Is this accurate?
1
SPEAKER_01
It s mostly accurate.
1
SPEAKER_01
What we re concentrating on is sensory substitution for the deaf.
1
SPEAKER_01
So we are transmitting sound into patterns of vibration on the skin.
1
SPEAKER_01
And then people, for example, who are deaf can come to hear.
1
SPEAKER_01
I don t know if you ever saw this, but in 2015, I gave a talk at TED about this.
1
SPEAKER_01
And halfway through the talk, I ripped my shirt off and I m wearing this vest underneath.
1
SPEAKER_01
And the vest has these vibratory motors with lights on it so you can see what s going on.
1
SPEAKER_01
And I show how this captures sound and it translates sound into patterns on the skin.
1
SPEAKER_01
And it demonstrated how people who are deaf can come to hear this way.
1
SPEAKER_01
And in the meantime, what we ve done since that time is we ve shrunk this down to a wristband
1
SPEAKER_01
So it has vibratory motors on it on the wrist and we re on wrists all over the world now.
1
SPEAKER_01
So, you know, big company warehouses, some governments, which I can t say, you know, but some governments for their deaf employees all over the world, deaf schools and so on.
1
SPEAKER_01
We capture sound for people who are deaf and.
1
SPEAKER_01
I just want to mention the only other option for someone who s deaf is what s called a cochlear implant, which is $100,000 and it requires an invasive surgery.
1
SPEAKER_01
And our solution is a hundred times cheaper than that.
1
SPEAKER_01
And so it s really revolutionized this.
1
SPEAKER_01
But what we ve done more recently actually is come up with a solution
1
SPEAKER_01
to replace hearing aids.
1
SPEAKER_01
So what it s doing is it s exactly the same wristband with these vibratory motors, but it s listening using AI in real time.
1
SPEAKER_01
It s listening for the high frequency parts of speech like a K or an S or a T or a V, things like that.
1
SPEAKER_01
And it just buzzes to tell you, oh, I just heard a K, I heard a T, I heard a V. When people, as they get older and start losing their hearing, their ears are still doing fine at the medium and low frequencies.
1
SPEAKER_01
They just can t hear the high frequencies anymore.
1
SPEAKER_01
So what we re doing now is just listening to the high frequencies for them and clarifying what got said.
1
SPEAKER_01
And it takes about a week or two for the brain to be able to fuse these signals.
1
SPEAKER_01
And then the brain says, cool, I got it.
1
SPEAKER_01
You said,
1
SPEAKER_01
You know, sheep versus sheik versus sheet, whatever it, you know, figures out what was just said.
1
SPEAKER_02
And then their team s working on something similar for vision.
1
SPEAKER_02
Is that accurate?
1
SPEAKER_01
Yes, that s right.
1
SPEAKER_01
There s a group in Wisconsin, for example, that has an electrode grid that sits on the tongue.
1
SPEAKER_01
So it feels like pop rocks in your mouth.
1
SPEAKER_01
And there s a camera on the forehead, let s say, you know, built into your glasses.
1
SPEAKER_01
So the camera is looking out at the world and you re feeling on your tongue, the shapes of things and edges in the world.
1
SPEAKER_01
So if there s, let s say, you know, a coffee cup moving from left to right, you will feel that on your tongue.
1
SPEAKER_01
Or if there s, you know, the edges of a doorway, you feel that on your tongue as you re approaching it.
1
SPEAKER_02
So you write about this girl, Danielle.
1
SPEAKER_02
It s a horrible story, a child, not socialized, obviously a highly abusive situation, never developed speech, missed that, is it the first seven years, essentially, when we re developing all these pathways and mapping our brains and coordinating our senses.
1
SPEAKER_02
Can you talk a bit about Danielle?
1
SPEAKER_02
And then I m curious, for people who have never been able to hear or have never been able to see,
1
SPEAKER_02
Does this technology still work or is it primarily effective for people who have lost that function but have the original map?
1
SPEAKER_01
So let me do this in reverse order.
1
SPEAKER_01
So it works perfectly well, in fact, exactly as well for people who are born blind or born deaf as it does for someone who s, who goes deaf later.
1
SPEAKER_01
It takes slightly longer to learn the older you get, but otherwise everybody can get to the same level, which is remarkable.
1
SPEAKER_01
And you know, why this happens is because as I argue in the book, the brain
1
SPEAKER_01
is what I call live wired, which means it s very fluid.
1
SPEAKER_01
It s moving around.
1
SPEAKER_01
Technically in the field, we call this neuroplasticity.
1
SPEAKER_01
We call the brain plastic, but I actually don t prefer that term at all because about a hundred years ago, that term was introduced because William James was interested in the way that you can mold plastic and it will hold onto its shape.
1
SPEAKER_01
And in the same way, when you have your fifth grade teacher and learn
1
SPEAKER_01
his or her name, there are changes in the structure of your brain such that you remember your teacher.
1
SPEAKER_01
It s like plastic in the way that you ve molded it into some shape and it retains that shape, which is pretty amazing.
1
SPEAKER_01
But we re so far past the point of being impressed with plastic manufacturing now.
1
SPEAKER_01
That s why I use the term live wired, because it s this forest of 86 billion neurons that are changing and reconfiguring every second of your life.
1
SPEAKER_01
So it s a much bigger concept than plasticity.
1
SPEAKER_01
But in any case, brains are very plastic or live wired.
1
SPEAKER_01
And so whatever information is coming in, the brain will just figure out how to use it if it s a useful information source.
1
SPEAKER_01
So in this example, if we re passing in here, if we re passing in auditory information from the world, it doesn t matter if it s coming through your ears or through the skin of your wrist.
1
SPEAKER_01
Your brain says, oh, I see that s correlated with this person s mouth moving and it s socially important to me.
1
SPEAKER_01
Or, you know, someone s knocking on the door, someone s saying something to me or there s a dog barking at me or whatever the issue is.
1
SPEAKER_01
Your brain puts together these different senses and says, OK, I got this.
1
SPEAKER_01
And then people actually come to hear.
1
SPEAKER_01
through the signals on the skin.
1
SPEAKER_01
I mean, this is what people describe after about six months of wearing this is they say, I m just hearing it.
1
SPEAKER_01
I say, when the dog barks, do you feel the buzzing on your wrist?
1
SPEAKER_01
And you look at your wrist, you try to figure out what it was.
1
SPEAKER_01
I say, no, no, I just hear the dog out there.
1
SPEAKER_01
Now that sounds crazy, but remember that s
1
SPEAKER_01
What your ears are doing, your ears are just, you know, these very sophisticated structures made out of cartilage and skin and so on that are directing the sound into the ear canal where you ve got a vibrating membrane.
1
SPEAKER_01
So as I m speaking, your eardrum is vibrating and that goes through several states, you know, the middle ear, then the inner ear.
1
SPEAKER_01
I ll skip all the details, except it gets turned into spikes along all these nerves.
1
SPEAKER_01
What we summarize is the auditory nerve.
1
SPEAKER_01
You ve got.
1
SPEAKER_01
You know, millions or billions of little spikes that are carrying my voice, little electrical spikes.
1
SPEAKER_01
And that s all that happens in the silence of your brain are these spikes, but you attribute it to, Oh, I m hearing Eagleman s voice.
1
SPEAKER_01
And it sounds like it s happening out there.
1
SPEAKER_01
But in fact, everything about the hearing of my voice is happening inside your head in the silence and darkness.
1
SPEAKER_02
So stunning.
1
SPEAKER_02
And so Danielle, as a child, essentially locked in or shut into her own experience.
1
SPEAKER_02
It s just a closed door.
1
SPEAKER_01
Well, so let me explain.
1
SPEAKER_01
She was severely neglected and her father had mental problems and didn t want any noise at all.
1
SPEAKER_01
And so he kept her locked into her room and wouldn t let her out.
1
SPEAKER_01
And her entire childhood, she was locked in.
1
SPEAKER_01
She was about the closest thing that we have.
1
SPEAKER_01
Unfortunately, these cases are
1
SPEAKER_01
not as rare as we would hope.
1
SPEAKER_01
But, you know, cases like this are the closest thing we have to feral children, meaning, you know, children that are raised without the normal social benefits that almost all children get.
1
SPEAKER_01
And so
2
SPEAKER_00
Mother Nature took a particular gamble with human brains, which is that she made it very flexible and works under the assumption that a human baby s brain will drop into the world and be exposed to language and touch and love and stuff like that.
2
SPEAKER_00
And in these very rare cases where a child does not get language or touch or love,
2
SPEAKER_00
we see what happens, which is that the brain does not develop correctly.
2
SPEAKER_00
So Danielle, when she was finally discovered, because somebody noticed that occasionally there would be a little face in the window and the neighbors didn t know whose face that was, it didn t make sense to them.
2
SPEAKER_00
And so police eventually came to investigate and Danielle was discovered.
2
SPEAKER_00
But by the time she was, it was too late for her because there are critical windows to learn
2
SPEAKER_00
Language, for example, there was nothing wrong with Danielle s genetics or brain as such.
2
SPEAKER_00
It s just that she didn t get the other half of what she needs.
2
SPEAKER_00
So you come into the world with half of what you need, which is your DNA, and the rest of the brain gets wired up from your experience in the world, your parents, your neighbors, your culture, your language, your friends, all that stuff that wires your brain up.
2
SPEAKER_00
And she didn t have any of that.
2
SPEAKER_00
And so the brain does not wire correctly.
2
SPEAKER_00
And by the way, as you know, because I mentioned it in the book, but a softer version of this happened in the Romanian orphanages at the fall of Ceausescu.
2
SPEAKER_00
There were tens of thousands of children in these Romanian orphanages and the staff was totally overwhelmed.
2
SPEAKER_00
And so they said, look, you can t talk to the kids or touch the kids because if you do, they will become clingy.
2
SPEAKER_00
And so our protocol, our rule here is that you don t talk to the kids and you don t touch them.
2
SPEAKER_00
You just put the food in the cribs and you, and so on.
2
SPEAKER_00
And these kids all grew up with major, major cognitive limitations as a result, because that s the other half of what is needed.
2
SPEAKER_01
Yeah.
2
SPEAKER_01
I mean, it certainly makes sense and it s awful.
2
SPEAKER_01
It s fascinating, too, this idea that Mother Nature would recognize.
2
SPEAKER_01
And, you know, I sort of knew this only in the sense of I d always believed and recognized this as part of it, that babies are born so helpless, in part because we wouldn t be able to get them out of our bodies.
2
SPEAKER_00
I should just expand on that for the listeners, which is just that, you know, we ve got particularly big brains.
2
SPEAKER_00
And so a baby can t fit out of the vaginal canal if our brains got any bigger.
2
SPEAKER_00
And so the final secret that Mother Nature came up with is, OK, let s push it out in the world, sort of half baked.
2
SPEAKER_00
And then it figures things out from there.
2
SPEAKER_01
But it seems like there s an extra mechanism to that sort of half formation that then the world can impose on the child, right?
2
SPEAKER_01
And create that responsive environment.
2
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, and this is, by the way, why we are the runaway species.
2
SPEAKER_00
I mean, there are so many animal species on the earth, but we are the only ones that, you know, talk on Zoom and have podcasts and get to the moon and invent the internet and invent vaccines and,
2
SPEAKER_00
build cities and bridges.
2
SPEAKER_00
I mean, we are the only species on the entire planet doing this.
2
SPEAKER_00
And the reason all comes down to this issue of live wiring.
2
SPEAKER_00
It s just that we have these brains such that, you know, if you are a dog, each generation, you re just you re starting off from zero again and just being a dog or a horse or an alligator.
2
SPEAKER_00
But a human child goes to school and learns essentially everything that humans before them have ever discovered.
2
SPEAKER_00
So my daughter is eight years old.
2
SPEAKER_00
And she gets to ride on top of this huge tidal wave of humankind and know, oh, okay, I got it.
2
SPEAKER_00
This is, you know, Newtonian physics.
2
SPEAKER_00
That took a really smart guy a long time to figure it out.
2
SPEAKER_00
Oh, I got it.
2
SPEAKER_00
That s physics.
2
SPEAKER_00
Oh, here s a phone that I can hold in my hand that has the entirety of humankind s knowledge on it.
2
SPEAKER_00
That s cool.
2
SPEAKER_00
And yeah, that s what s made humans so successful is that we are flexible.
2
SPEAKER_00
So we don t have to start from zero every time.
2
SPEAKER_01
Yeah.
2
SPEAKER_01
So is your daughter actually eight?
2
SPEAKER_00
Yes.
2
SPEAKER_01
I have two boys, seven and 10.
2
SPEAKER_01
I have to say that your book was incredibly affirming in your optimistic stance on the internet and education.
2
SPEAKER_01
Can you talk a little bit about that?
2
SPEAKER_01
Because I m going to just misquote your book back to you, but essentially like when we can learn driven by our own curiosity,
2
SPEAKER_01
And we had the Encyclopedia Britannica in the basement.
2
SPEAKER_01
And I would go and, you know, get the paragraph entry, but you can t necessarily follow your interests as a child, or you couldn t when we were children in the same way.
2
SPEAKER_00
Right.
2
SPEAKER_00
I grew up in the mountains of New Mexico.
2
SPEAKER_00
And so when I wanted to get a hold of the Encyclopedia Britannica, my mother would have to drive me down to the library, which is half an hour away.
2
SPEAKER_00
And maybe the encyclopedia would have an article, maybe it was 10 years old or something, or I d go thumbing through the card catalog.
2
SPEAKER_00
You remember that process?
2
SPEAKER_01
Oh, yeah.
2
SPEAKER_00
So the difference now is that children are exposed to all of our knowledge.
2
SPEAKER_00
They have that at their fingertips.
2
SPEAKER_00
And the reason that is important is because brain plasticity happens when you are curious about something.
2
SPEAKER_00
That is the highest level of brain plasticity, because you have the right neurotransmitters
2
SPEAKER_00
kicking around in there.
2
SPEAKER_00
And so when you want to know the answer to something and you look it up and you get the answer right away, then you actually remember it.
2
SPEAKER_00
So in our generation, we got a lot of just-in-case knowledge, like, hey, just in case you need it, the Battle of Hastings occurred in 1066.
2
SPEAKER_00
But what the kids are getting now is lots of just-in-time knowledge.
2
SPEAKER_00
So as soon as they re curious about something,
2
SPEAKER_00
They can find the answer.
2
SPEAKER_00
We ve all had this experience.
2
SPEAKER_00
I mean, it happens multiple times a day to me where I get lost in these mole holes of Wikipedia.
2
SPEAKER_00
And it s such a pleasure where one thing is leading to another thing, and I m just following my curiosity.
2
SPEAKER_00
And I end up on some page and I think, how in the world did I get here?
2
SPEAKER_00
I can t even remember the sequence of pages that got me here.
2
SPEAKER_00
But that is incredibly useful from the brain s point of view.
2
SPEAKER_00
And I ve noticed, by the way, just a change in the way that dinner conversations go from the time that I was a kid.
2
SPEAKER_00
You know, as a kid, we d have some argument at dinner and it would get stuck because no one actually knew the answer.
2
SPEAKER_00
And so maybe two or three people would assert they know the answer.
2
SPEAKER_00
And and then it was just sort of stuck with no one knowing.
2
SPEAKER_00
But now, you know, everyone s phone gets whipped out, bang, bang, bang.
2
SPEAKER_00
Oh, here s the answer.
2
SPEAKER_00
Here it is.
2
SPEAKER_00
And then the conversation keeps going.
2
SPEAKER_00
And so it moves at this incredibly fast pace.
2
SPEAKER_00
Everyone learns stuff.
2
SPEAKER_00
So yes, the point is this is incredibly good for people s brains.
2
SPEAKER_00
I have a lot of colleagues in the neuroscience field who pipe off about things about, oh, the internet and digital natives and so on.
2
SPEAKER_00
But you know what?
2
SPEAKER_00
They don t know.
2
SPEAKER_00
They re making it up when they have these things to say about the ills of the internet.
2
SPEAKER_00
And the reason they don t know is because you can t actually do a good experiment on this.
2
SPEAKER_00
In other words, you always need a control group.
2
SPEAKER_00
And there are no control groups for this generation that s grown up digitally, because you could look at, for example, the Amish or some kid that s growing up in a terribly impoverished environment and use them as a control for someone who s grown up in this era without the Internet.
2
SPEAKER_00
But there are 100 other differences there.
2
SPEAKER_00
And you can t compare
2
SPEAKER_00
that last generation to the previous generation, because there are lots of other differences there in terms of, you know, education and pollution and politics and what like everything s different.
2
SPEAKER_00
So they don t serve as good control groups.
2
SPEAKER_00
So there s a lot of there s a lot of piping off about the Internet.
2
SPEAKER_00
But in fact, I think from a neuroscience point of view, that the next generation is bound to be much smarter than we are because of this incredible intellectual diet that they re raised on.
2
SPEAKER_01
not to make you necessarily talk about your parenting, but do you have rules or how do you inform the use of the internet by your daughter?
2
SPEAKER_00
Yeah.
2
SPEAKER_00
And I also have a son who s 11.
2
SPEAKER_00
So my kids are similar in age to you.
2
SPEAKER_00
You know, obviously it s tough because they get sucked into these things that, you know, I mean, my daughter is into Taylor Swift now and my son s into any video game.
2
SPEAKER_00
But what I try to do all the time is
2
SPEAKER_00
do things with them online.
2
SPEAKER_00
So we do Duolingo together.
2
SPEAKER_00
We watch YouTube videos on things that we are trying to figure out as a group.
2
SPEAKER_00
And so I just, I try to expose them as much as possible to the amount of knowledge that is out there.
2
SPEAKER_00
And I just try to find the stuff that s fun.
2
SPEAKER_01
Yeah.
2
SPEAKER_01
I mean, I have to say my 10 year old definitely will end up as a neuroscientist or it s just like the only thing that s interesting to him and thank God for YouTube and thank God for
2
SPEAKER_01
mark rober yes yes and the amount of stuff that he consumes and retains is stunning i mean and then i m constantly like it s not true and then i check i mean he was telling me about bernie s paradox and he s
2
SPEAKER_01
leap years when I told you I m not a scientist.
2
SPEAKER_01
I m really not a scientist.
2
SPEAKER_00
And here s the thing.
2
SPEAKER_00
We always think, you know, I mean, as proud parents, it was like, oh, my kid s such a genius.
2
SPEAKER_00
And maybe they are geniuses.
2
SPEAKER_00
But more importantly, they are just growing up in a time where you can learn about these things.
2
SPEAKER_00
It s just that s the mother s milk that s available.
2
SPEAKER_00
I run into kids all the time who I m talking to them.
2
SPEAKER_00
They ll say something really smart.
2
SPEAKER_00
I ll say, wow, how did you know that?
2
SPEAKER_00
And they say, oh, I saw that in a TED talk.
2
SPEAKER_00
And I realize, you know, I grew up in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
3
SPEAKER_00
You know, you re stuck with whatever homeroom teacher you have who may or may not be more than one page ahead of you in the book.
3
SPEAKER_00
And now kids get to learn on whatever topic they re interested in from the best person in the world, giving the best talk of their life in 15 minutes.
3
SPEAKER_00
It s a totally different experience.
3
SPEAKER_01
It s amazing.
3
SPEAKER_01
I wish that my youngest son were on quite a virtuous stream of content.
3
SPEAKER_01
I m always like, what is that?
3
SPEAKER_01
I mean, we need some interference in the stuff that he finds hilarious.
3
SPEAKER_00
One thing to really keep in mind here is to be
3
SPEAKER_00
honest when we think back on the ways that we wasted time as kids.
3
SPEAKER_00
I mean, we did so much stupid stuff that wasn t meaningful.
3
SPEAKER_00
And everyone has a tendency to do this retrospective romanticization or say, well, when I was a kid, I sat and read the dictionary or whatever.
3
SPEAKER_00
But it s all bullshit.
3
SPEAKER_00
It s just not true.
3
SPEAKER_00
It s not what people did as kids.
3
SPEAKER_00
We just had different ways of wasting time.
3
SPEAKER_01
Yeah.
3
SPEAKER_01
I mean, I grew up in Montana.
3
SPEAKER_01
And similarly, like out in the woods.
3
SPEAKER_01
And we had a lot of books.
3
SPEAKER_01
And that was my primary form of entertainment because my parents were so shaming.
3
SPEAKER_01
And then we got a Mac and I d play the typing game.
3
SPEAKER_01
So I learned how to type incredibly fast from the only computer game that we had.
3
SPEAKER_01
But it s interesting.
3
SPEAKER_01
I mean, not to go on a total tangent too, but my kids also like video games.
3
SPEAKER_01
some of which are violent, and I don t restrict it in part because I m like, I think that this is an actually acceptable way for my kids to experience their shadow.
3
SPEAKER_01
And it s funny, I m just listening to a podcast about sort of the way that we moralize around culture with this idea that it s that insistent that it changes human behavior.
3
SPEAKER_01
And I have an aversion to this idea that we need to only bathe our children in like the most virtuous activities for fear that they ll be contaminated or ideas will be planted in their heads.
3
SPEAKER_01
I don t know if you have any thoughts about that, but.
3
SPEAKER_00
Sure, I do.
3
SPEAKER_00
And, you know, by the way, as parents, this is what we try to do is to bathe them that way.
3
SPEAKER_00
But boy, it is impossible to keep the rest of the stuff out of the bathtub.
3
SPEAKER_00
And so.
3
SPEAKER_00
I agree with you.
3
SPEAKER_00
This is part of what I talk about in LiveWIRED.
3
SPEAKER_00
And in fact, I ve got a long footnote about the number of experiences that you have in one day.
3
SPEAKER_00
Over the course of a full day, you have so many new experiences.
3
SPEAKER_00
And so all of this is rewiring your brain.
3
SPEAKER_00
It is impossible as a parent to ever hope
3
SPEAKER_00
that we can control the trajectory they re on.
3
SPEAKER_00
And by the way, as parents, we know that kids pop out with their own personality from day one anyway.
3
SPEAKER_00
All we re trying to do, make sure the kid gets piano lessons and swim lessons and this and violin lesson, whatever else they want.
3
SPEAKER_00
know, we re just here to support that journey.
3
SPEAKER_01
Right.
3
SPEAKER_01
Two things.
3
SPEAKER_01
So you mentioned personality.
3
SPEAKER_01
And what s your conception of how personality forms?
3
SPEAKER_01
I agree with you, my kids have completely different sort of base demeanors that I do not think we re informed by, oh, it s the first child and the second child, things were pretty similar.
3
SPEAKER_01
What do you think is the genesis of personality?
3
SPEAKER_00
So this is one of the oldest debates in neuroscience and in the literature is nature versus nurture.
3
SPEAKER_00
Which one has more influence?
3
SPEAKER_00
Is it the genes you come to the table with or is it the experiences you have?
3
SPEAKER_00
And the answer is so clearly both.
3
SPEAKER_00
The nature versus nurture debate is totally dead because these things are intertwined.
3
SPEAKER_00
So you drop into the world with a particular set of genes and that dictates where you can or can t go.
3
SPEAKER_00
Just as an example, I would like to be a great swimmer like Michael Phelps, but I just don t have the same wingspan that he does.
3
SPEAKER_00
So I m just never going to be there.
3
SPEAKER_00
I don t have the genetics for it.
3
SPEAKER_00
So I think of it like a cone where you start off at the base, you know, at the, like the ice cream cone, you start off at the sharp point.
3
SPEAKER_00
And then depending on your experiences in the world, you can, you know, move through time up the cone, but you can go through all these directions, but it s constrained.
3
SPEAKER_00
You can t be anything, but your experiences determine the directions that you do end up taking.
3
SPEAKER_00
Anyway, personality, a lot of that you drop into the world with, you refine the rest when you re growing up.
3
SPEAKER_00
But we all know as parents what it s like to see certain aspects of our children where we think, OK, this kid is more like Michael Phelps in the sense that he s really competitive.
3
SPEAKER_00
And this kid over here is more like, you know, Mozart, that he loves music.
3
SPEAKER_00
And this kid over here is more like whatever, Marie Curie, who loves science.
3
SPEAKER_01
the discovery of DNA wasn t obviously a dead end, but it didn t pan out, right, in terms of offering us all the answers about who we are in the world.
3
SPEAKER_01
Do you think that we ll ever have a more intimate understanding of that essential imprint?
3
SPEAKER_01
I would call it the spirit or the daemon, to quote Jung, like that animating impulse.
3
SPEAKER_01
Will we find that, do you think, someday?
3
SPEAKER_01
Or do we just not quite have the right lens yet to understand that?
3
SPEAKER_00
So we do have the right lens and the answer is pretty clear, which is it is the structure of your brain, which comes about as a function of your genetics that you came to the table with and all of your experiences.
3
SPEAKER_00
And so we can do, you know, whole genome mapping quite easily now, but you re exactly right.
3
SPEAKER_00
There was so much excitement in the year 2000 when the human genome project was coming to completion.
3
SPEAKER_00
We all thought, wow,
3
SPEAKER_00
Wow, this is going to tell us everything.
3
SPEAKER_00
And in fact, it certainly didn t answer many of the questions that we would like to know.
3
SPEAKER_00
Because if somebody was born 3000 years ago with exactly your DNA, they would be totally different.
3
SPEAKER_00
They wouldn t be Elise in any meaningful way that we recognize, except they might look a bit like you.
3
SPEAKER_00
you know, first of all, they d speak a different language, they d be part of a different culture, they d have had a different diet, they d be exposed to all kinds of different things.
3
SPEAKER_00
Their thoughts, the deities they believe in, the whatever, would all be so different from even your way of thinking.
3
SPEAKER_00
So experience in the world matters a lot and your DNA is just a piece of the puzzle.
3
SPEAKER_00
In answer to your question of could we ever
3
SPEAKER_00
you know, measure that better.
3
SPEAKER_00
Obviously, we can measure your DNA just fine now.
3
SPEAKER_00
But the weird answer is maybe in 100 years from now, we ll all be wearing full time cameras the way that police officers wear cameras on their vests.
3
SPEAKER_00
People are working on this sort of thing.
3
SPEAKER_00
There s a new company coming out called Humane, for example, where instead of carrying around a cell phone, you ve just got this camera attached to you that just records everything in your life and can do all kinds of interesting things.
3
SPEAKER_00
This is all still in the very
3
SPEAKER_00
very, very early stages, but I can imagine in 100 years, maybe we actually record everything.
3
SPEAKER_00
And then we d have a better sense of what s going on.
3
SPEAKER_00
And we d say, Oh, you know, at least actually, this thing happened when she was seven, that kind of influenced her.
3
SPEAKER_00
And when she was 13, she had a crush on this boy, and that didn t work out.
3
SPEAKER_00
And that hurt her and change her behavior a little bit and blah, blah, whatever.
3
SPEAKER_00
And so we could put together a whole life story.
3
SPEAKER_00
Obviously, we would need
3
SPEAKER_00
chat GPT, it ll be, you know, GPT 397 at that point or whatever.
3
SPEAKER_00
And we ll have to have some massive technology to summarize a life story.
3
SPEAKER_00
But that will certainly get us closer if we could know everything about a person s life experiences.
3
SPEAKER_01
It s just interesting to imagine like understanding there are however many people who are dropped in with an almost essentially identical blueprint.
3
SPEAKER_01
And then here s the variation as they ve gone through their lives versus like, how similar are we?
3
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, I mean, look, there are at least a million genetic differences between me and you.
3
SPEAKER_00
Just what are called single nucleotide polymorphisms, where maybe I have a T and you have an A or I have a C and you have a G, you know, whatever, like the protein
3
SPEAKER_00
meant for doing whatever still works just as well, but just slightly different.
3
SPEAKER_00
Anyway, between any human and any other human, there s at least a million differences.
3
SPEAKER_00
But of course, it s even more than that.
3
SPEAKER_00
As you drift farther and farther from people that you re genetically related to, it s even more.
3
SPEAKER_00
And so the differences between people is enormous.
3
SPEAKER_00
And in fact, this has been a giant part of what I study in my career is
3
SPEAKER_00
Obviously, we can all point to things like the big things like, oh, that person has schizophrenia or that person has psychopathy, let s say.
3
SPEAKER_00
And we say, OK, so I m different than that person.
3
SPEAKER_00
But it s way more subtle than that.
3
SPEAKER_00
The differences between one person and another can be extremely subtle.
3
SPEAKER_00
Just as one example, do you know what synesthesia is?
3
SPEAKER_01
Yeah.
3
SPEAKER_01
Oh, yeah.
3
SPEAKER_01
This is fascinating.
3
SPEAKER_01
Yeah.
3
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, so for anyone who doesn t know, you know, someone with synesthesia might look at letters on a page and that triggers a color experience or they might hear something and it triggers a visual for them or they, you know, hear something and it puts a taste in their mouth or they taste something and it puts a feeling on their fingertips.
3
SPEAKER_00
There are all these different forms of synesthesia.
3
SPEAKER_00
And the point is,
3
SPEAKER_00
This is not a disease or a disorder.
3
SPEAKER_00
It s just an alternative perceptual reality.
3
SPEAKER_00
And we now know that, you know, a not insignificant portion of the population has this, probably 3% of the population has some form of synesthesia, maybe more than that.
3
SPEAKER_00
But there are a million things.
3
SPEAKER_00
Have you ever heard of aphantasia and hyperphantasia?
3
SPEAKER_00
This is something I ve been studying for 16 years now, and I m obsessed with it.
3
SPEAKER_00
OK, so let s say I asked you to picture a brown and white cat sitting on a picnic table, eating cereal and looking at
4
SPEAKER_01
at you suspiciously.
4
SPEAKER_01
So my question to you is, when you picture that, do you have it like a clear image in your head, like a movie, or is it you re not picturing anything, but it s just conceptual?
4
SPEAKER_00
I can picture components of it and like hold it for a minute as a freeze frame, but then I would need to rebuild it if I sort of try to keep my attention on it.
4
SPEAKER_01
Okay, cool.
4
SPEAKER_01
So it turns out across the population, you ve got this whole spectrum where some people immediately see it like a movie.
4
SPEAKER_01
I mean, they see it in detail.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s like they re looking at it and other people all the way at the other end of the spectrum
4
SPEAKER_01
don t see anything in their heads.
4
SPEAKER_01
There is no picture in their heads.
4
SPEAKER_01
They re just conceptualizing it.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so at the first end, we call that hyperphantasia.
4
SPEAKER_01
And at the other end, we call that aphantasia.
4
SPEAKER_01
And it turns out, you know, my colleagues and I have been studying this for years across the population.
4
SPEAKER_01
Everyone s different.
4
SPEAKER_01
There are all kinds of surprises, just as one example,
4
SPEAKER_01
I ve been working with Ed Catmull on this for some years.
4
SPEAKER_01
He s the guy who started Pixar and has all the patents on ray tracing and all this stuff.
4
SPEAKER_01
Turns out he s aphantasic.
4
SPEAKER_01
He doesn t see anything in his head.
4
SPEAKER_01
And what he found out is that most of the great animators and directors at Pixar, they re not seeing anything in their head, which came as a surprise.
4
SPEAKER_01
But my new view on this, my hypothesis on this is that
4
SPEAKER_01
people who grow up aphantasic become better artists, because if you are hyperphantasic, if you see everything so clearly in your head, then when it comes time for you to draw a horse, you already think you know what a horse looks like, and it s not going to be, you know, right or accurate.
4
SPEAKER_01
But if you re aphantasic, you really have to look at what the heck s out there and you have to have a dialogue with the page and pencil and make corrections and really pay attention to what you re seeing out there.
4
SPEAKER_01
So I think it s more likely for aphantasic people to become artists.
4
SPEAKER_00
And is that like an auditory cortex disorder?
4
SPEAKER_00
Is it like dyslexia?
4
SPEAKER_01
So it s a visual cortex issue.
4
SPEAKER_01
And what we were able to measure in brain scanning is that the more activity you have in visual cortex when you re imagining something, the clearer it is.
4
SPEAKER_01
You re essentially just running that machinery without information from the eyeballs, but instead with feedback information.
4
SPEAKER_00
So interesting, because aren t so many amazing filmmakers dyslexic?
4
SPEAKER_00
Like Spielberg is, I know.
4
SPEAKER_00
I think there is a high correlation.
4
SPEAKER_00
I m not completely sure.
4
SPEAKER_00
My son has an auditory processing disorder, which I had never heard of.
4
SPEAKER_00
It s passing the information back and forth from language to visual, back to language.
4
SPEAKER_00
So he will give me, this is why he loves science, a part of probably why he gives me 90 successive facts.
4
SPEAKER_00
Not so much a story.
4
SPEAKER_01
Yeah.
4
SPEAKER_01
What s interesting actually, sorry, this is just a one second tangent, but you know, one of the classes I teach at Stanford is called literature and the brain.
4
SPEAKER_01
And that s because I actually majored in British and American literature as an undergraduate, because that s what I love.
4
SPEAKER_01
And one of the things that got me interested once I became a neuroscientist was this issue about story, about how story is the right mechanism
4
SPEAKER_01
to get anything from brain to brain.
4
SPEAKER_01
In other words, if I gave you a list of facts, you re going to forget it.
4
SPEAKER_01
It doesn t mean much to you, but if I wrap it in a story, it has meaning to you.
4
SPEAKER_01
For example, you read my book Livewired and one of the first things you remembered was the story of Danielle, which I
4
SPEAKER_01
you know, presented as a story at the beginning of the chapter.
4
SPEAKER_01
And then I go into the details that you need to know about the brain, but start with the story.
4
SPEAKER_01
And, you know, I m running this podcast, Inner Cosmos, and it s a monologue podcast.
4
SPEAKER_01
So every week I do 45 minutes to an hour monologue.
4
SPEAKER_01
And it s stories where by the end of it, the listener has really learned some stuff about the brain.
4
SPEAKER_00
No, I love that podcast, and so does my son.
4
SPEAKER_00
Finally, this idea of neuroplasticity, obviously it fades with age.
4
SPEAKER_00
But I want you to tell us about the nuns, because I think that s so promising.
4
SPEAKER_00
And then if you can segue there, do you like how I give you three things to do and one response?
4
SPEAKER_00
Sure.
4
SPEAKER_01
I can hold it in mind.
4
SPEAKER_01
Yep.
4
SPEAKER_00
Okay, your conversation about dreaming was fascinating.
4
SPEAKER_00
I had no idea that that was a mechanism for the visual cortex to preserve its real estate in the brain.
4
SPEAKER_00
But this idea that I guess in some ways like working out your brain and its impact
4
SPEAKER_00
I think we all know this, right?
4
SPEAKER_00
That first-stroke victims, that sort of getting them re-engaged will rewire the part of the brain that s still accessible or, I guess, available.
4
SPEAKER_00
But can you talk about the real estate of the brain and how it can be rewired, reapplied?
4
SPEAKER_01
Yeah.
4
SPEAKER_01
Okay.
4
SPEAKER_01
So let me address points three and one first.
4
SPEAKER_01
So the point is that as you grow older, your brain is able to keep rewiring all the time.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so we have this impression that the flexibility of the brain decreases as you get older, but in fact,
4
SPEAKER_01
It s just because your brain s job is just to figure out how to get by in the world and do a good job in the world.
4
SPEAKER_01
And once you ve figured most things out, like, oh, these are different kinds of personalities, and this is how I need to do something at work, and this is how I use email and phone and whatever, then your brain does less changing only because it has successfully done its job and it doesn t need to keep changing.
4
SPEAKER_01
The brain changes when there s surprise, when there s something that happened that it wasn t expecting, then it changes up.
4
SPEAKER_01
So you still have plenty of plasticity even when you re 90 years old.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s just that most people aren t using it at that point because they say, oh, I got it.
4
SPEAKER_01
I know how things work.
4
SPEAKER_01
I know how politics work.
4
SPEAKER_01
I know everything I need to know.
4
SPEAKER_01
The point is you need to always seek novelty and seek challenge.
4
SPEAKER_01
cognitively, emotionally, everything.
4
SPEAKER_01
And that s what keeps your brain young and healthy and moving around and making changes.
4
SPEAKER_01
So I do all kinds of things to try to, you know, keep my brain always on its toes and surprised.
4
SPEAKER_01
You know, it s really easy to rearrange things in your house, you know, push things around.
4
SPEAKER_01
Find the part of your house that s been there the longest.
4
SPEAKER_01
Like, oh, the desk has always been against this wall.
4
SPEAKER_01
And this painting s always been on that wall.
4
SPEAKER_01
Whatever, just, you know, switch things around.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s easy to do.
4
SPEAKER_01
It takes five minutes.
4
SPEAKER_01
It s worth doing.
4
SPEAKER_01
I try to drive a different route home from work every day so that I can just see new things.
4
SPEAKER_01
It doesn t make me live longer, but it makes it seem as though I ve lived longer.
4
SPEAKER_01
So when it comes to something like a stroke patient, when a person has had a stroke, typically what happens is for the first X number of days, there s a lot of swelling and stuff like that.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so you re not sure how things are going to turn out.
4
SPEAKER_01
But once the swelling goes down, then you can really tell what skills
4
SPEAKER_01
have been lost, usually because a chunk of brain tissue is gone and not coming back.
4
SPEAKER_01
The good news is you can rewire the remaining tissue to cover a lot of that ground.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so the whole key once somebody has had a stroke is to make sure that they are working hard to recover, to regain those skills.
4
SPEAKER_01
Sometimes it s like being an infant again and relearning skills from scratch, but that s how you rewire your brain.
4
SPEAKER_01
And people can have
4
SPEAKER_01
remarkable recoveries just because they re totally rewiring things.
4
SPEAKER_01
So that s why it s important when there s any kind of brain damage.
4
SPEAKER_01
Going to the question about the nuns, there was a study, an ongoing study, where a whole bunch of nuns and priests in Chicago agreed to donate their brain upon their death for research.
4
SPEAKER_01
And so the researchers were examining at autopsy all these brains of nuns, and what they found was something that really surprised them.
4
SPEAKER_01
which was that some fraction of these nuns actually had Alzheimer s disease, but nobody knew it when they were alive.
4
SPEAKER_01
No one had detected that because they weren t showing it cognitively.
4
SPEAKER_01
Even though the brain tissue was getting chewed up by the ravages of the disease, they weren t having any of the cognitive problems.
4
SPEAKER_01
And it s because they lived in these convents till the day they died and they had social responsibilities and they were playing games and they had chores and they were driving places and they had a million conversations with people.
4
SPEAKER_01
You know, this is how you keep the brain healthy by running the motor of it.
4
SPEAKER_01
In contrast, what happens often, a lot of people will retire and then their lives will shrink and they ll end up just sitting on their couch watching television.
4
SPEAKER_01
And that is really the worst thing that you can do for your brain.
4
SPEAKER_01
Having a shrunken social life, not challenging yourself to do new things, that kind of thing.
4
SPEAKER_00
I was just talking to Ellen Langer, and you probably encountered her at Harvard.
4
SPEAKER_00
She s one of the mothers of mindfulness, and she did that counterclockwise study where she took, this is an old study, but famous, where they took, I think it was men, and put them in a setting that took them back 20 years, and everything looked like they were 20 years younger, and they were sort of forced to
4
SPEAKER_00
carry their own bags and move as though they had the mobility of, let s say, a 60-year-old, not an 80-year-old.
4
SPEAKER_00
And within five days, I think, they started to show the impact of this in their blood work.
4
SPEAKER_00
And so you also have to wonder, the nuns, the fact that they re in, in some ways,
4
SPEAKER_00
maybe a time capsule, or there s so little maybe variation and how they dress or what they re eating.
4
SPEAKER_00
I ve never been a nun, so I can t necessarily speak to it.
4
SPEAKER_00
But it s interesting to think if they also aren t a little bit in a bit of a counterclockwise study.
4
SPEAKER_01
Well, I can speak from my experience as a nun.
4
SPEAKER_01
Just kidding.
4
SPEAKER_01
So I don t know,
5
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, that s a really interesting observation, though, about about all the things that don t change for them, even despite all the stuff that is held constant.
5
SPEAKER_00
They are constantly dealing with the other nuns.
5
SPEAKER_00
And it turns out that other people is the hardest thing that your brain does.
5
SPEAKER_00
because you re constantly having to assume what they mean and guess and how do I say this so that I can get the other person to do this or understand what I mean or whatever.
5
SPEAKER_00
And it s just tons of cognitive work for your brain.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so having an active social life is everything.
5
SPEAKER_00
That s a major part of it.
5
SPEAKER_00
So you can imagine someone who has a big house and wears different clothes every day and stuff like that.
5
SPEAKER_00
But if they don t have any social life,
5
SPEAKER_00
because they re just older and they re, for whatever reason, they ve allowed their life to shrink like that, then that s the thing that causes their brain to degenerate.
5
SPEAKER_00
Or I should say the lack of the cognitive exercise is what causes their brain to degenerate.
5
SPEAKER_00
So I ll come back to this thing that you asked about dreams.
5
SPEAKER_00
So the reason you had never seen that before, by the way, is because this is the new theoretical framework that I ve built
5
SPEAKER_00
to explain dreams.
5
SPEAKER_00
And what s funny is some people have asked me and said, wait, don t we already know why we dream?
5
SPEAKER_00
But the answer is no, there actually is not a good explanation for why we dream.
5
SPEAKER_00
People say things, just general things like, oh, well, you know, it allows you to practice things that you wouldn t normally get to practice, or, you know, it helps with memory consolidation, things like that.
5
SPEAKER_00
But no one has any proof for any of this stuff.
5
SPEAKER_00
And I ended up with my student deriving a theory that
5
SPEAKER_00
we can prove quantitatively across species.
5
SPEAKER_00
So here it is.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so I was talking about the plasticity of the brain.
5
SPEAKER_00
Here s the thing.
5
SPEAKER_00
If you go blind, your visual system at the back of your brain will get taken over eventually by hearing, by touch, by other things.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so this is why blind people have this extraordinary sense of hearing and of touch.
5
SPEAKER_00
And they can tell things at a much finer resolution than you can because they have more brain real estate devoted to it.
5
SPEAKER_00
Okay, the surprise in neuroscience was how fast this takeover could happen and nobody expected this to be fast, but some colleagues of mine at Harvard figured out that if you blindfold people and put them in the scanner, the brain scanner, you can see after an hour of being blindfolded, when you make a sound or you touch somebody, you start seeing activity in their visual system.
5
SPEAKER_00
So that means the encroachment is starting after this incredibly short amount of time.
5
SPEAKER_00
So what my student and I realized is, you know, look, we live on this planet that rotates into darkness away from its star, you know, for half the time.
5
SPEAKER_00
And obviously, you know, we re all used to electricity, but our entire evolutionary history, it was really dark when the planet rotated.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so you can still hear and smell and touch and taste in the dark, but you can t see.
5
SPEAKER_00
And that puts the visual system at a big disadvantage, compared to the other senses.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so there are all kinds of hypotheses about why we sleep one of the main ones is that it s you know to keep us out of trouble in the dark and so you go into the corner of the cave and you essentially shut off.
5
SPEAKER_00
But the point is your visual system is not getting any input, whereas all the other systems are still getting, you can still hear and touch and stuff like that.
5
SPEAKER_00
So what we realized is that it needs some way to defend itself against takeover.
5
SPEAKER_00
And that s what dreams are.
5
SPEAKER_00
Every 90 minutes, you ve got these very ancient circuits in your midbrain.
5
SPEAKER_00
that just generate random activity and blast this activity into the primary visual cortex.
5
SPEAKER_00
That s the only place it goes.
5
SPEAKER_00
It doesn t go brain-wide.
5
SPEAKER_00
It just goes into your visual cortex, just the first stage of it.
5
SPEAKER_00
And every 90 minutes, you just blast this random activity in there.
5
SPEAKER_00
And because we are visual creatures, we see.
5
SPEAKER_00
We say, oh, I m in a meadow, and I m approaching a castle, and I m whatever.
5
SPEAKER_00
But essentially, the whole thing is just a screensaver.
5
SPEAKER_00
It s just protecting it against takeover from the other senses.
5
SPEAKER_01
God, dream analysts must hate you.
5
SPEAKER_01
I ve had some prophetic dreams, though.
5
SPEAKER_01
I ve had some pretty magical dreams.
5
SPEAKER_01
I don t mind, as science evolves, that some of the magic is taken over by science.
5
SPEAKER_01
That s exciting.
5
SPEAKER_01
I do think there s just so much we don t understand.
5
SPEAKER_00
It is, of course, the case that there s so much we don t understand when it comes to prophetic dreams.
5
SPEAKER_00
It doesn t actually seem to be any prophecy happening in dreams.
5
SPEAKER_00
But what does happen, obviously, is I mean, look at it this way.
5
SPEAKER_00
Look at this way.
5
SPEAKER_00
Let s say that you dream about a big earthquake.
5
SPEAKER_00
And then you turn on the news in the morning and you see that there was some big earthquake in Brazil or something, and you ll say, God, that was prophetic.
5
SPEAKER_00
But, you know, think about it this way.
5
SPEAKER_00
There are probably, I don t know, 500 million hours of dreaming every night in America.
5
SPEAKER_00
And the real statistical aberration would be if nobody dreamt of an earthquake, right?
5
SPEAKER_00
That would be the surprising part, though, worth keeping in mind.
5
SPEAKER_01
Okay.
5
SPEAKER_01
I can t let you go without asking you about AI.
5
SPEAKER_01
You seem quite optimistic that a computer will never be able to understand what s relevant to humans.
5
SPEAKER_01
Do you still feel optimistic?
5
SPEAKER_00
Well, I m so glad you asked that question.
5
SPEAKER_00
So I wrote this book LiveWired in 2020, or that s when it was published.
5
SPEAKER_00
I wrote it really in 2018 and 19.
5
SPEAKER_00
And everything has changed so rapidly in the AI space.
5
SPEAKER_00
We re all, you know, holding on to this fast wave that we re surfing and trying to understand what s going on with it.
5
SPEAKER_00
I would say AI
5
SPEAKER_00
at the moment, even the best large language models and all that stuff, doesn t have a model of what it is to be a human.
5
SPEAKER_00
What it does have is it s read every single thing humans have read.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so it s able to do these statistical games and tell you the most likely next word and so on.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so it s able to tell you things that seem quite extraordinary, but it s not because it has a model of being a human.
5
SPEAKER_00
And in fact, there are
5
SPEAKER_00
despite the incredible advances and the things that we ve all been seeing with it, there are ways in which it suddenly has its pants fall down all the time.
5
SPEAKER_00
Just as an example, it s not very good at getting jokes or making jokes because to make a joke, you have to think of the punchline first and then you work backwards.
5
SPEAKER_00
The way these large language models work is everything is going in the forward direction.
5
SPEAKER_00
They re just asking, what word do I put next?
5
SPEAKER_00
AI always has not had a good model of the physical world.
5
SPEAKER_00
So if I say, hey, when,
5
SPEAKER_00
president Biden walks into the room, does his head come with him?
5
SPEAKER_00
That s obvious for you.
5
SPEAKER_00
It s not obvious for an LLM.
5
SPEAKER_00
So we can see ways in which we think, oh, yeah, it s not quite like a human, but it may be that it is.
5
SPEAKER_00
becoming intelligent, just sort of a different sort of intelligent, not the way that humans are.
5
SPEAKER_00
This is yet to be seen.
5
SPEAKER_00
I mean, I m doing experiments on this every day about whether it actually has something like theory of mind, which is, you know, what is it like to be in your shoes?
5
SPEAKER_00
There are all these tests in psychology about theory of mind.
5
SPEAKER_00
Little children can t do it very well.
5
SPEAKER_00
Children with autism can t do it very well.
5
SPEAKER_00
You know, like if I ask you a question, Bob comes into his room and puts his baseball under his bed.
5
SPEAKER_00
Then he leaves.
5
SPEAKER_00
Then his mother comes in the room, sees the baseball there, and she puts it away in the closet.
5
SPEAKER_00
Now Bob comes back in the room.
5
SPEAKER_00
Where does he look for the baseball?
5
SPEAKER_00
So any adult will know that Bob s going to look under the bed because that s where he thinks it is.
5
SPEAKER_00
But in order to answer that correctly, you have to ignore the fact that, you know, the baseball is in the closet.
5
SPEAKER_00
You have to be in Bob s shoes.
5
SPEAKER_00
You have to have a theory of what it is like to be Bob.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so little kids can t do this.
5
SPEAKER_00
Well, they ll say closet, you know, kid with autism will say closet.
5
SPEAKER_00
And the question is chat GPT able to really understand what it is to be in someone else s head.
5
SPEAKER_00
And there s some sparks of that where it seems like, my gosh, it s.
5
SPEAKER_00
I m not bad at doing that.
5
SPEAKER_00
And let me just say one more thing about this, because I ve been obsessed, obviously, for the last year with AI, like everyone has.
5
SPEAKER_00
So I published a paper some months ago about how we could actually test for intelligence in AI.
5
SPEAKER_00
And we have things like the Turing test, which is, could a machine impersonate a human and fool somebody?
5
SPEAKER_00
And the answer is, totally.
5
SPEAKER_00
That s old news already.
5
SPEAKER_00
It s easy to fool somebody into thinking they re talking with a human.
5
SPEAKER_00
So that s not really the right measure for intelligence.
5
SPEAKER_00
So I propose that it s scientific discovery.
5
SPEAKER_00
When it can actually discover new things in science, then we ve got something to contend with.
5
SPEAKER_00
Then we have something that is smart in the way that humans are smart.
5
SPEAKER_00
And I m not talking about just piecing together facts in the literature.
5
SPEAKER_00
which is obviously very useful, but I m talking about the next level.
5
SPEAKER_00
Like when Einstein says, what if I were riding on a beam of light, what would the world look like?
5
SPEAKER_00
What would it be if I were moving at that speed?
5
SPEAKER_00
And he developed the special theory of relativity and, you know, or Darwin figuring out evolution by natural selection by thinking, okay, what about all the animals I m not seeing here?
5
SPEAKER_00
What if there were a bunch of animals that also existed, but they didn t make it?
5
SPEAKER_00
That kind of stuff.
5
SPEAKER_00
You know, putting yourself in a theoretical world, like I said earlier about jumping to some island and seeing if you can build a bridge there.
5
SPEAKER_00
This is what humans are so good at doing all the time.
5
SPEAKER_00
And so the question is, when is AI going to get there?
5
SPEAKER_00
And by the way, it might be very soon.
5
SPEAKER_01
I know, it seems quite rapid.
5
SPEAKER_01
I mean, isn t the idea that AI will be able to start coding or programming itself?
5
SPEAKER_00
is what we re all worried about.
5
SPEAKER_00
Yes.
5
SPEAKER_00
When that happens.
5
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, we might as well.
5
SPEAKER_00
Yeah.
5
SPEAKER_00
The part, let me just say one last thing about this.
5
SPEAKER_00
The part that has remained fascinating to me is what this means for human creativity.
5
SPEAKER_00
And I
6
SPEAKER_01
I think, perhaps surprisingly, that this actually means very little in terms of damaging human creativity.
6
SPEAKER_01
People are still going to write, people are still going to perform, do art, things like that.
6
SPEAKER_01
Even if AI can do it better, just look at something like chess.
6
SPEAKER_01
I mean, it was years ago that AI proved definitively that it could crush humans at chess.
6
SPEAKER_01
Nobody can play as well as an AI, but you know what?
6
SPEAKER_01
Chess is more popular than ever.
6
SPEAKER_01
There are more humans playing chess now than ever before.
6
SPEAKER_01
Why?
6
SPEAKER_01
Because they enjoy it.
6
SPEAKER_01
And by the way, you can get trained, you know, you can do these good training programs where you re using AI training, so you don t make stupid mistakes.
6
SPEAKER_01
But humans enjoy doing this stuff.
6
SPEAKER_01
And by the way, when, you know, visual painters were, you know, painting their canvases, and the camera was invented,
6
SPEAKER_01
they thought, we re dead.
6
SPEAKER_01
No one s ever going to paint anymore because you can capture a scene perfectly in just one click.
6
SPEAKER_01
But you know what?
6
SPEAKER_01
Painting never went away.
6
SPEAKER_01
It just flowered on a neighboring field to photography.
6
SPEAKER_01
So I think it ll only enhance things and it s not going to make any of our human endeavors go away.
6
SPEAKER_00
Yeah, no, I hope you re right.
6
SPEAKER_00
I was talking to Baratunde Thurston about this, and he was saying, and we were just laughing, and I mean, it s not funny, but the things that AI seems to be going after out of the gate are the creative endeavors, right?
6
SPEAKER_00
Like taking the jobs, theoretically, of photographers, writers, and it s like, well, no, that s the provenance.
6
SPEAKER_00
Like, do the programming or do the things that don t require, I guess programming requires a lot of creativity, but they re sacred.
6
SPEAKER_00
to humans, but maybe I m just biased.
6
SPEAKER_01
Yeah, that s right.
6
SPEAKER_01
I mean, just as a side note, that s not all they re going after.
6
SPEAKER_01
It s all the high level jobs.
6
SPEAKER_01
I mean, just as an example, you know, the whole legal profession, you know, the idea of a paralegal looking up case law and spending a month looking at you just don t need that anymore.
6
SPEAKER_01
You know, radiologists.
6
SPEAKER_01
This has actually been an interesting one, because many years ago it was predicted that radiologists would be gone by now.
6
SPEAKER_01
But in fact, they re not.
6
SPEAKER_01
They re doing fine because I can.
6
SPEAKER_01
actually examine an image better than a human radiologist.
6
SPEAKER_01
And yet you need the human radiologist to understand that in context and talk to the patient and see what the patient s choices are and all that kind of stuff.
6
SPEAKER_01
These things will evolve and flower rapidly, but I don t think it s going to be a wholesale replacement.
6
SPEAKER_00
Yeah.
6
SPEAKER_00
I do think I can write better than ChatGPT.
6
SPEAKER_01
Exactly.
6
SPEAKER_01
By the way, I mean, I try this sometimes, you know, as I m doing stuff, I think, oh, maybe I can just get it to spit out this paragraph for me.
6
SPEAKER_01
And it writes it about the level of a really intelligent, you know, sophomore in high school or something.
6
SPEAKER_01
Yeah.
6
SPEAKER_01
It doesn t ever reach to the standard that professional writers need to do.
6
SPEAKER_00
At the end of Lived Wired, David Goldman writes, at some point, we might perhaps be able to read the rough details of someone s life, what he did and what was important to him from the exact molding of his neural resources.
6
SPEAKER_00
If feasible, this would amount to a new kind of science.
6
SPEAKER_00
By looking at how the brain shaped itself, could we know what a person was exposed to and perhaps what he cared about?
6
SPEAKER_00
Which hand did this person use for fine motor skills?
6
SPEAKER_00
What were the relevant signals in his environment?
6
SPEAKER_00
What was the structure of his language?
6
SPEAKER_00
And all the rest of the questions that we cannot answer by looking simply at guts and hair and knees and fingernails.
6
SPEAKER_00
I want to have another conversation with Eagleman at some point because I want to talk about psychic phenomena and other energies that are perceptive, perceptible to some people and not to others.
6
SPEAKER_00
And whether he thinks we ll ever have the science to understand what s at play or whether he thinks we can already explain that phenomena.
6
SPEAKER_00
I believe that sort of the realm of Wu, which isn t such a nice word, but we re going to go with it, will ultimately be something that we ll have language for, that will live within science.
6
SPEAKER_00
Maybe not all of it, but certainly some of it.
6
SPEAKER_00
And he seems to be one of the people who s exploring all of those big questions.
6
SPEAKER_00
The magic, really, that I think keeps us all engaged, entertained, inspired.
6
SPEAKER_00
If you liked today s episode, please rate and review and tell a friend.
6
SPEAKER_00
You can find show notes and full transcripts of the episodes at EliseLuhnen.com.
6
SPEAKER_00
While there, please sign up for my sub stack.
6
SPEAKER_00
I send a short note every Wednesday about topics that are aligned with this show and a deeper dive most Sundays.
6
SPEAKER_00
Or follow me on Instagram at EliseLuhnen.
6
SPEAKER_00
And finally, if you haven t already, please consider picking up a copy of my New York Times bestselling book, On Our Best Behavior, The Seven Deadly Sins and the Price Women Pay to be Good, available wherever you get your books.
6
SPEAKER_00
It s an exploration of how women have been conditioned for goodness, men for power, and all the ways we ve been programmed to police ourselves and each other according to these cultural ideas of what it is to be a good woman.
6
SPEAKER_00
I d also like to give a huge thank you to my sponsors who make this show possible.
6
SPEAKER_00
Please support them the way they support this podcast.
6
SPEAKER_00
This has been a presentation of Cadence 13 Studio.
6
SPEAKER_00
If you enjoyed this episode, please listen, rate, review, and follow Pulling the Thread.
6
SPEAKER_00
Available now for free on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Odyssey, or wherever you get your podcasts.
6
SPEAKER_00
I want to give a shout out to Phil Svitek, Lauren Legroso, Mary-Kate McDonough, Ali Brockman, and the entire Kedans13 team for producing these episodes, and to Valero Duval for my key art.
6
SPEAKER_00
Take care of yourselves.
6
SPEAKER_00
I ll see you next time.