Frankenstein where there is you know there have been a lot of close reading of the production of the monster right and the fate of the monster; so, to speak. So, there have been interpretations that argue that Mary Shelley is unfair to this monster; character while there was also been very strong interpretations that say that she is in fact, probably one of the few novelists of that time, who is kind of giving us an insight into what the experience of disablement is, right if we think of the monster as somebody who has to live through this life of stigma and we see the monster going through various relations just because of the way he looks you know where there is a very quick assessment in the that the onlookers make of how his appearance must also reflect you know on his state of mind, his morality and also his actions.
मेरी शैली यांनी लिहिलेल्या फ्रॅन्केन्स्टाईन या कादंबरीचे उदाहरण आपण घेतले आणि त्यात वर्णन केलेल्या राक्षसाच जवळून निरीक्षण करून त्याचा अभ्यास केला तर आपल्याला काही प्रतीकात्मक गोष्टी यावरून कळून येतात. अशा प्रकारच्या वर्णनामुळे मेरी शैली यांनी राक्षसाच्या पात्राची मांडणी करताना अन्यायकारक भूमिका घेतली असे काही विचारवंतांचे मत आहे. याविरुद्ध असे देखील विचारवंत आहेत जे सांगतात की या निवडणूक लेखकांमध्ये आहेत ज्यांनी आपल्याला उचित प्रकारे अपंगत्वाचे वर्णन त्यांच्या कादंबरी द्वारे करून दाखवले. असे दोन्ही विचार प्रवाह उपस्थित आहेत.