Arkansas Could Finally End Prohibition After More Than 80 Years
Drop a pin on a map of Arkansas and your chances of finding a stiff drink there are about 50-50. But that could soon change if enough residents vote for a constitutional amendment on Tuesday's ballot that would open the entire state to beer, wine and liquor sales for the first time since the 1930s. Arkansas is one of dozens of states that allow local municipalities to make their own decisions about selling booze, but only about 10 states actually have dry counties, most of which are in the South. The result is what's known as "patchwork prohibition," where the state is divided into wet, dry and even moist beer and wine only counties. The divisions can be confusing, with wet cities occasionally in dry counties and highly-profitable liquor stores almost always parked just across the border from booze-less regions. In Texas, for example, 49 of the state's 254 counties are wet, 11 are dry and the rest are a combination of wet and dry. Alabama has 25 dry counties, but many cities within them are wet. And in Kentucky's 120 counties, 39 are dry, 32 are wet and 49 are some combination of the two. No state comes closer to an equal division than Arkansas, where 37 counties are dry and 38 counties are wet. Opening these dry counties to alcohol sales has become an increasingly popular economic development tool. Several counties in Kentucky have used their "local option" to expand liquor sales in the last couple years, while voters in Alabama's largest remaining dry city are considering a similar ballot initiative Tuesday as well the 2012 push failed by close to 400 votes. Unlike most other votes on the wet/dry issue, the Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Initiativewhich would allow the "manufacture, sale, distribution and transportation of intoxicating liquors" throughout the state beginning on July 1, 2015is subject to a statewide vote. That's because attorney David Couch, the chair of pro-wet group Let Arkansas Decide, found that the number of signatures required for getting the measure on the state ballot was not much more than what it would've taken in just the three counties he had initially targeted. Couch's main rationale is economic. He cites a University of Arkansas study showing that if Faulkner, Craighead and Saline counties were wetthree of the state's biggest counties, and ones where Walmart has expressed interest in selling booze they would each generate an additional 12 million to 15 million in annual economic activity. And he estimates the total statewide benefit of going wet at an additional 100 million a year. But Couch has other motives, too. "These dry counties make my state look kind of backward, and I don't like that," he says. "This is a much more modern approach to alcohol regulation.", The amendment seemed to have signs of support in September. But the opposition appears to have grown in recent weeks. Part of that may be a huge cash infusion from Citizens for Local Rights, a group opposed to the amendment. The organization has raised 1.8 million compared to 200,000 for Couch's Let Arkansas Decide. Citizens for Local Rights is backed largely by liquor retailers in wet counties that want to keep out new competition. The Conway County Liquor Association, for example, has given the group 540,000. All six counties surrounding Conway are dry. The amendment has also been criticized by religious leaders wary of making alcohol more available. Brian Richardson, chairman of Citizens for Local Rights, casts the issue as a matter of regional autonomyno small claim in a vote that will come down partly to rural turnout. "It's a badly written, overreaching amendment that guts local communities from being able to make decisions on a local level," he says. "It's letting people in the more populous counties determine this.", Couch says his only poll found majority support for passage, but it was conducted last month. Richardson says his group's final survey points to partial prohibition remaining in place, with 58 of respondents opposed to the amendment. "I hate to jinx ourselves," Richardson says. "But I think we'll have a decisive victory."