text:
Islamic marriage advice and family advice

Why NO punishment for cheating spouse?

1) Why there is no punishment PRISCRIBED by Allah or shariah for a married women who is cheating her husband with another married man
She did not have intercourse but are having verbal affair and planning to get divorce and then get married.
A HARAM thing then doing so called HALAL thing ? Still Allah will forgive them ( if they repent ) ?
2) And then she is allowed to get married to the other man ( after repentance," oh i am really... sorry, its a sin , its a mistake, i will never ever do it again....)
3) why is she not to be killed (a)if proven beyond doubt (b) if she confess ( they did not have intercourse but are having verbal affair and planning to get divorce and then get married)

Please answer urgently...

Tagged as: , , , , , , , , , ,

8 Responses »

  1. Because they didn't have intercourse. That's why no Islamic punishment.

    If the spouses knows and they don't like it, they can get a divorce or talk and mediate with a marriage counselor or a professional to save their marriage.

    Honestly, when a spouse is cheating there must be something wrong with the marriage. Either a relationship problem or something else.

    • She cheated on him while still being his wife so she'll face the consequences on the day of qiyama and she has her zunub. If she felt she couldn't continue with the marriage. She would have talk to the sheik to put an end to it not cheat on him. There was once a lady who came to the prophet and told him her husband is one of the best men he is a good man but yet she fears that being with him will make her go against Allah. She didn't go ahead and cheat on him. PS the person who posted this sound like someone who doesn't have enough imaan and someone so naive about Islam how can you post a picture saying injustice and blaming for not naming in the Quran. Allah is the hero and the knower he knows best and anyhow he judges things doesn't give you a right to call it injustice

      • Salam Blackeena,

        I don't think the original poster posts the picture. You'll notice the same picture is repeated through multiple questions so I think this website is posting a picture according to what the question is asking.

  2. Just dont forgive her. If one hasnt forgiven, it will remain unforgiven on the day of judgement. Bcoz it involves the affairs of two persons.

  3. What Is the question? Did the "Wife cheat on the husband"? If so, than theirs a "Torment+Punishment".

    Now If the "Wife actually didn't cheat on the husband", but "has a new love In her life (Cheating from the heart), yet hasn't actually acted upon the act (Desires to be with this other man), and has "planned to divorce her current (husband) to be with the (new man) and make him her (new husband)". What's the penalty (Of the 2nd case), is that your question? If so, than let me ask you, why would you still "be with a person, that Is speaking to another man, behind your back, and planning to leave you for that person"? Why? Lets assume you, (Love your wife), well (Sorry to say), but she (Doesn't Love you), that's the honest to goodness truth (Nothing you say/can and will change that fact), so let her go (As living with a person that has no Intention of being with you, Is Insulting to you as a (Man), Is It not?

    Now If "You're actually thinking that this person should be "Punished/Killed/Stoned/Beheaded" for wanting to divorce you, than I ask you (Why)? Who are you, to make that judgement? Who are you to think that you have the "Right" to end another human beings life, all because that person, doesn't wish to "Be your wife anymore"? Are you that "Jealous or Malice to the point that you (Would actually believe that If this person doesn't wish to be with me than she doesn't have the right to be happy I.E live)? Seriously? Are you honestly asking this question (If I understand correctly)? Why do you think "ALLAH (SWT)", allows "Divorce"? Did "Our Rabb/Allah (SWT), state that 2 people that are married can't get a divorce" (If HE/Allah SWT) stated as much (You can't argue), but "HE/Allah (SWT), allows divorce (HE doesn't like It), but (HE/Allah SWT), allows It.

    At the end of the day, It sucks, "Getting divorced (Cheated on from the heart)" It hurts "Your ego/pride/self esteem" (I can relate), but for you to be thinking of ways to "Make sure that your wife/ex-wife will never be happy and/or planning her demise Is even worse".

    • Nauto
      You post seems to say cheating is such a pious n noble act and she should be rewarded and this guy who is not cheating should be hanged for asking questions .

      • Maybe, you misread my post? In no way did I state "Cheating Is halal and/or pious" as the 2nd case Isn't even "Cheating", The person doesn't "love the poster anymore", and that's an "executable offense"? What gives you/me/him/or anyone the right to "force another human being to either stay with me/you or anyone by force under the threat of death", where's the love/respect and honesty that marriage life was built upon?

        As for the poster, I'm just questioning the "rationality of someone that would wish to end the life of another, that actually committed no offense In the first place (merely based on the fact that she doesn't wish to be with this person).

        • Even non intercourse but talk level cheat too is cheat .You post again seems to encourage cheating .
          He has asked simple question the way islam prescribes harsh punishment for intercourse level adultery so why not at talk level .

          AS per Imam Maliki school of thought if a person starts affair with married woman and turn her against her husband so that he can marry her then such marriage is invalid n they can't marry .Please Google and get more information about Imam Maliki view .

          EVEN IF there is cheat at talk level then too it is sinfull and haraam .If some body don't bother about sins and life after death then life is open to them to cheat or sleep with anybody .

Leave a Response


Content-Type: application/http; msgtype=response

WARC-Identified-Payload-Type: text/html

WARC-Type: response

text:
Terrier Woody

Terrier Woody

Thursday, July 22, 2010

Talkin' bout the dog wash yeah!

Come on and sing it for me, dog wash
Dog Wash Yeah!
(Scrub and scrub) Well those fleas never seem to stop jumpin'.
(Scrub and scrub) Keep those soaps and hoses hummin'
(Scrub and scrub) my furs to the bone
Dog Alive, I can't wait 'til it's time to go home
Get your dog washed today.
Don't tell me to sit and stay
Come on, let's go and play
Get a Dog Wash right away!

Happy Scrubbin'
Wyatt and Stanzie

  1. all fluffy and sparkly clean again! I bet you smell good, too!

  2. What's the green stuff Wyatt got into? Cute signage for the business. Wyatt looks all sparkling clean now!

  3. Hey Wyatt! I don't know the tune of that song but it doesn't matter...the pictures of you are adorable and the "before" and "after" pictures are fantastic!

  4. How nice - a self service dog wash.

    Lilly, Piper, Carrleigh and Ruairi

  5. SIGH... Love the song... hate the baff.. I am soaked to the skin.. RIGHT NOW.. Mom said something about... No mud balls in the clean bed Blah blah blah blah.

  6. Singin' and tappin' paws...
    You don't look happy which matches our sentiment precisely every time we get the dreaded scrub. Next time we'll sing the song and hopefully it'll be a bit more joyful...

  7. Holy crap...thats something else. bet you are smelling purrty good right now
    Benny & Lily

  8. I have never gone to one of those bathe your dog places, but I have definitely thought about it. Murphy actually does a pretty good job keeping himself clean. I think he learned it from the cat he grew up with... When he sleeps in my bed he almost always gets up around 4 or 5 in the morning - as soon as it starts to get light out - and goes and lays down in front of the mirror and grooms himself for 15 or 20 minutes before returning to bed. No joke.

  9. So, have woo khorrekhted their efFURts yet?

  10. Hey Wyatt, what's that green stuff on your furs? Are you celebrating St. Paddy's Day early?

    We are not big fans of baths, but you make it look like fun.

    Woos ~ Phantom, Thunder, and Ciara

  11. Hey Wyatt - I can relate! I have heard rumors that I am going to the groomers on Saturday. Maybe my mom will oversleep and forget to take me.

    Your pal, Pip

  12. You sing real pretty Wyatt, and cleaned up nice too :) I'm sure you had a fun time getting the green stuff in your fur though!

  13. Bath Day, Wyatt!
    I hope you enjoyed it a lot!
    Kisses and hugs

  14. So fresh and so clean. Do you like bath time, Wyatt?

    Teddy Bear

  15. You sure don't look too happy about a bath, Wyatt!
    This barn that we're building will eventually be a clock shop - no animals this time around!

    Love ya lots
    Maggie and Mitch

  16. Hahahaha ...,
    I don't like baths! I had one on Tuesday and right after Mummy cut all my furs off! Why bother washing it when you cut it all off???
    You are funny Dales. We like your songs.
    Nelly x

  17. Hi Wyatt! You look clean and fluffy!

  18. Heh, you look like me Wyatt. Very unhappy till its over! What was that green stuff on your face? Mushy Peas?

warcinfo:
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-158-191-93.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2017-51
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for December 2017
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf


WARC-Truncated: length

text:
Doughnut Plant for Breakfast

So last night I was researching doughnuts, as one does – and saw that Doughnut Plant has a lavender flower doughnut right now.  Yum!  I am a big fan of flower flavored things.  This morning I went to DP (can I call it that?) thinking I would get one yeast and one cake and report back to you lovely people.  But I was denied – which only means I will be forced, FORCED, to go back.

Instead, I purchased three cake doughnuts: tres leches, blackout and wild blueberry.  The tres leches is my favorite of all their doughnuts.  When I buy doughnuts for the office (which happens a lot) I always make sure to buy an extra one for me which I have them package separately in it’s own bag because if I came back with 24 doughnuts and somehow didn’t get one whole tres leches for myself, we would have problems.  Tres leches is exactly that – a milk cake doughnut filled with vanilla pudding and dipped in a milk glaze.  Somehow it isn’t too rich or too sweet.  The creamy center guarantees that it will always have that amazing softness to it.  Never disappoints.

I didn’t actually ask for a blackout cake doughnut.  I’m not the biggest chocolate person.  But the cashier rung it up and there it was in my bag and this is a taste test after all so here we go.  The blackout doughnut is a chocolate lover’s dream: chocolate cake, filled with chocolate pudding, dipped in chocolate glaze and sprinkled with chocolate cake crumbs.  It’s like the moistest chocolate cake you have ever had.  I can’t imagine eating a whole one without a big glass of milk, which isn’t a complaint.

I’m pretty sure they picked these wild blueberries THIS MORNING before shoving them in this doughnut.  Yum!  I took a bit and then looked at the doughnut, trying to understand what was going on.  The cake doughnuts are this lovely balance of what you would imagine from a birthday cake and a pound cake.  This doughnut manages to balance that with fresh blueberries and a sweet glaze (used sparingly) which makes for a lovely experience.

If you’re wondering what happened to the rest of the doughnuts, my office-mates were more than happy to help me in this journey.  Tres leches is still my favorite.  But I thank the other two doughnuts for there participation.  All washed down with a cold brew coffee, half-and-half/no sugar.  Good morning to me!

One thought on “Doughnut Plant for Breakfast

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


WARC-Identified-Payload-Type: application/xhtml+xml

text:
Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Open Letter to Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminists

Posted by: Rachel Piazza

Originally posted on

Dear Radical Feminists in attendance at the Shulamith Firestone Women’s Liberation Memorial Conference on What is to be Done,

I too, was gathered with you for this conference in New York City. I was excited to be involved in a consciousness raising session, and interested to hear your collective thoughts on what is to be done. I had heard the criticisms of transphobia within your movement, but naively hoped such sentiment came from a small, removed faction. As I sat among you, and your notable speakers, I realized I couldn’t have been more wrong. Transphobia and transmisogyny are alive and well within your walls. The disdain with which you referred to trans women and your collective refusal to accept them as women was shocking and horrifying. This letter is to voice what I did not have the courage, or the words to say when I was in your presence.

Ladies, you are not feminists. Feminism, as defined by bell hooks is the movement to end sexism, sexist exploitation and oppression.  Your tactics and vision place you squarely as oppressors.  You are fundamentally no different than the patriarchal system you supposedly seek to dismantle. Your vitriolic exclusion of women whose bodies do not qualify as appropriately “female,” is little different than the exclusion of white women from the public sphere or blacks from white-only spaces. The logic is the same. You are an elitist class exercising and maintaining privilege by denying a systemically oppressed class access to your space. It is an age-old tool of oppression.

Maybe you’ve been so focused on your own liberation, you failed to notice that trans people suffer immensely from the discrimination and hatred that those like you dish out. In fact, 41% of trans people have attempted suicide, one in five have experienced homelessness, and nearly all have feared for their lives. Trans women are the most frequent targets of anti LGBTQ hate crimes. Is this really the group you choose to target?

At the conference one of you spoke out about the fundamental right of lesbian women to bodily autonomy, emphasizing the importance of being free to choose who to love. Others of you made it clear that women should not be defined by their reproductive capacity. The hypocrisy in these sentiments were mind-blowing. In one breath you championed your own freedom from biology, yet scoffed at the idea that trans women are not defined by theirs. Your suggestion that SOME women deserve bodily autonomy, while others do not is horrible, self-aggrandizing and reprehensible.

I’d like to know how you determine which women are worthy of bodily autonomy and of occupying your space. You see, sex and gender aren’t quite as simple as you seem to think. Human beings are complex creatures, and sex, gender and sexuality can be expressed in an infinite number of ways at different points in time. It wouldn’t even suffice if one were required to show their genitalia before entering your space, since human sex/gender is not clear-cut. Yet, your obsession with the idea of “real” women makes this horrific scenario all too plausible.

By erroneously defining women as those with female physical characteristics you have elevated your own status as cis-women and willfully exercised your privilege to oppress others. You do so, seemingly with the belief that you must climb over the backs of others to achieve liberation. The exclusion of trans women is, as one of your invited speakers explained, the linchpin, the one issue that would be the most effective in gaining “women’s” liberation. Making an argument for women’s liberation by denying access to some women is simply nonsensical.

However, it all started to make sense when another one of your speakers ranted about how, “it is necessary to fight your OWN oppression, rather than focus on the most oppressed,” and that you “can’t get wrapped up in guilt over someone else’s oppression.” It became clear that unlike your radical feminist title suggests, you are not worried about systems of oppression. Your lone concern is for your OWN liberation from your OWN specific form of oppression. Contrary to the fundamental tenets of radical feminism, you will gladly uphold oppressive systems if and when they benefit you.

While radical feminist theory presents valid criticisms and strategies to achieve liberation, your perverse rendition does not. Your trans-exclusionary practices are not feminist, and are certainly not radical. They are based on the retrogressive principle of biological hierarchy – the same principle that has subjugated women (and others) for centuries. I implore you to consider adopting a strategy aimed at achieving liberation for all women, and all people, regardless of race, class, gender or sexuality.

Rachel Piazza

No comments:


text:
Explore Touring and more!

More conservative: TSwift also copied (while covering up a bit more) JLo's fringed green onesie as she performed during the opening ceremony of the 2014 FIFA World Cup Brazil on June 12, 2014

Taylor Swift copies JLo's sexy fashions as she kicks off world tour

All of #TaylorSwift's Best 1989 Tour Outfits So Far!

All of Taylor Swift's Best 1989 Tour Outfits So Far

1989 world tour Please visit our website @ http://22taylorswift.com

See All of Taylor Swift's Looks From the '1989' World Tour

Sheer pantsuits, high-waist skirts, and lots of crop tops with sparkle: see ALL the looks from Taylor Swift& 1989 tour.

Taylor Swift performs during the "1989" world tour at Tokyo Dome in Tokyo, Japan, on May 6, 2015.   - Cosmopolitan.com

110 of Taylor Swift's Most Beautiful Looks


text:
Comment on From IIT to intraday options on Nifty

Nithin Kamath commented on 09 Aug 2016, 06:41 PM

When in a drawdown, best thing to do is to reduce your trading size significantly before doing anything else. I don’t know if there is any guaranteed strategies, You could check out:

View the full comment thread »