Bill -  If Sam's description below of the GCP procedure is correct, it looks to me  like something needs to be changed.
The difficulty lies in the fact that the  confirmation system reads the counterparty's name from Global Counterparty.
Since divisions of companies are not legal entities they do not have the  power to contract in their own names.
If the correct legal name is not in  Global Counterparty, the confirmation goes out with the wrong legal name on  it seriously compromising the contract itself.
That is the source of Tana's  concern regarding the correct entering of divisions in the system.
My suggestion is that Global Counterparty use the same name that the customer  has signed on the EnronOnline Password Application -- my understanding is

Urgent - Counterparty Divisions: Cargill Ferrous International