FBCG Is Showing Cracks
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF's top 5 holdings account for 33% of the portfolio. See why we don't see FBCG as terribly exciting at this time.
FBCG Is Showing Cracks
Summary
- We've been wary about the lag between consumer pessimism and corporate pessimism, where corporates weren't getting the memo.
- We called out major corporations like Google and Microsoft saying that the last earnings season, which was still strong, may be the last before an evident recession.
- It seems that we were right and corporate spending is taking a hit, even among America's most darling stocks, which depend heavily on continued growth for their prices.
- Substantial weighting towards Google, Apple and Microsoft should hurt FBCG, not to mention Nvidia which ultimately is getting hit by the crypto crash.
- An inflation peak could swiftly save this ETF.
- Looking for a helping hand in the market? Members of The Value Lab get exclusive ideas and guidance to navigate any climate. Learn More »
The Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (BATS:FBCG) is a US growth ETF with substantial weighting towards the American megacaps. 33% of the portfolio is accounted for by the top 5 holdings. Here we give our macro comment concerning trends in corporate spending, which have only just now started to decline broadly in the economy with a sign from some of the major advertising-exposed players, as well as some notes on consumer spending in China and crypto, all of which are trends that are going to affect much of this ETF as well as the economy broadly, with crypto being the least impactful of the factors. Whether this is the time to buy FBCG is a different matter - it depends on inflation's response to the current interest rate regime.
FBCG Breakdown
Let's have a quick look at the FBCG major holdings. The top 5 holdings that account for 33% of the portfolio are Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG) (GOOGL) and Nvidia (NVDA).
All of these stocks are staples of value-weighted ETFs, with their large market caps commanding high proportions of value-weighted ETFs that are already skewed towards tech and therefore growth. Almost all of them had very strong earnings seasons in late July/August despite the fact that rates had already risen substantially from the beginning of the year by then, and inflation had been taking their tolls on consumer budgets. At that point there was signs of consumer confidence declines but no declines were happening in businesses that faced enterprises. The issue of declining corporate spending in these major holdings is beginning to appear now, but also other factors that threaten their do-no-wrong status that justifies their high multiples and continued runways for growth despite signs that the economy is dipping.
Important Factors
Google recently reported earnings and pressures have become evident as more companies that sell ads compete for tightening ad budgets. While growth still continues, valuations of the top blue-chip growers are on stilts that can easily be kicked from under them by missed expectations, since horizons are so long for companies' whose fortunes seem certain. Microsoft also didn't see performance come as strongly from Azure. Amazon faces both consumers and producers, and was penalised by markets as a result. While a falling number of consumer sales would come out of the commission that Amazon takes on sales to any vendor on its platform (the marketplace subscription is probably solid unless vendors disappear), the AWS revenues were not able to help the company beat expectations in its latest earnings, following suit slightly with Azure. Markets penalised Amazon even harder due to the AWS disappointment, a segment that was regarded as an assured source of success.
In other words, we saw pass through of consumer spending declines into corporate spending and with consumer spending still affected, these decelerations may continue for the next quarters. Indeed, the general economic picture is not great even for the US, where current account improvements thanks to energy export is helping its finances and therefore the dollar, but consumer spending is distinctly softening.
In the case of Nvidia, the crypto crash has really not helped some of its retail sales that were going into crypto, as we predicted more than a year ago was a risk factor. Moreover, building cycles for new PCs have slowed due to supply chain woes still being digested in retail semiconductor and affecting its videogame markets. There, a disappearance of the casual gamer with the reopening may have created a hole in the market too, and this could be contributing in part to the general bloat we are seeing in semiconductor inventories, which went from being in shortage to suddenly in a glut. The worsening outlook for semiconductors confirmed by reports from heavily exposed economies like Taiwan raise questions about a lot of tech exposures that supply semiconductors or supply that industry.
Apple which isn't exactly a semiconductor company but a consumer staple company at this point, is still contributing to the electronics glut as well as their revise downwards their production plans in China on less than stellar initial reception for the iPhone 14 due to persisting lockdowns in China and bad economic outlook there, where it's following up in India more quickly than usual to keep momentum. China, which commands a lot of global wallet share, growth stock or not, is really on the decline. Apple and other companies are beginning to onshore activity from there, and this could trap China into middle-income status or send it into decline and deleveraging. China's worsening position in apart due to constant lockdowns but also less trust by West-destined supply chains is going to be a big problem global companies that very often depend in large part on the Chinese wallet.
While 50% of the FBCG is in technology, the next 17% is in retail trade, and with the consumer spending declines having been evident from last quarters and only reinforced by spending declines and continued rate hikes in the meantime, these stocks aren't particularly well positioned either.
Bottom Line
A recession affects the whole economy, but FBCG is exposed to American growth stocks which is a market that value growth higher than no other, and therefore those stocks depend a lot on expectations. In some cases, even the crypto declines will matter for business fundamentals, but in most cases, declines in consumer spending will impact fundamentals even of enterprise facing businesses that have now started to feel the burn. Moreover, China's economic woes, largely self-inflicted and liable to fester due to high leverage in the housing markets there, are going to affect a lot of tech companies in particular, especially the biggest ones that have used China as their latest growth markets, as their wallet share declines.
Consumer confidence has been lower for a while now, essentially showing itself last quarter. The depression in corporate spending has only just started, and could go on for another couple of quarters in all likelihood, even if inflation peaks in the meantime.
However, if inflation peaks as supply chains loosen up and bottlenecks like logistics see some easing, then markets will anticipate the Fed pivot and will jump regardless. A return to form will mean an even stronger reversion for the stocks in FBCG which has these higher Beta elements. That could save this ETF. However, unless you want to speculate on peak inflation, this ETF is not terribly exciting.
Thanks to our global coverage we've ramped up our global macro commentary on our marketplace service here on Seeking Alpha, The Value Lab. We focus on long-only value ideas, where we try to find international mispriced equities and target a portfolio yield of about 4%. We've done really well for ourselves over the last 5 years, but it took getting our hands dirty in international markets. If you are a value-investor, serious about protecting your wealth, us at the Value Lab might be of inspiration. Give our no-strings-attached free trial a try to see if it's for you.
This article was written by
Formerly Bocconi's Valkyrie Trading Society, seeks to provide a consistent and honest voice through this blog and our Marketplace Service, the Value Lab, with a focus on high conviction and obscure developed market ideas.
DISCLOSURE: All of our articles and communications, including on the Value Lab, are only opinions and should not be treated as investment advice. We are not investment advisors. Consult an investment professional and take care to do your own due diligence.
DISCLOSURE: Some of Valkyrie's former and/or current members also have contributed individually or through shared accounts on Seeking Alpha. Currently: Guney Kaya contributes on his own now, and members have contributed on Mare Evidence Lab.
Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
Comments (2)